Loading...
1815 HIGHLAND AVE NS, CITY OF CLEARWATER - PLANN NG & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TREE REMOVAL PERMIT �r NAME OF OWNER tL� A L <d26 °,i.'7 jG�'i isrr T' Lj�e -did ve. i� p� SITE ADDRESS l 6_2!5— A2 r +% L. ; 7.) PHONE OWNER'S ADDRESS :3 2-0aC f' ��� 7­A_^',10t LOCATION OF TREE(S) ON LOT P14 A-:</ SPECIES AND NUMBER OF TREE(S) S`41) 8 dct )04L-Al `� ��� s TO APPLICANT: A non - refundable fee of $15.00 for up to five trees to be removed, plus $3.00 for every tree above 5 to be removed is required. REASON FOR REMOVAL: Construction •See "A" below ❑ Hazardous ❑ Declining • Dead • Other (Specify) Fee Rec'd. $ Z A) CONSTRUCTION Date ... l . For new construction, additions. or other modificat,ons of a property which involve the removal of a protectedaree(s), a site plan is required. This site plan must ha�ie „ rnihirrium scale of 1"=201 for single family lots, or 1 " =50' for all others. The site plan must include: a. Major Changes of Grade f. Proposed Number of Parking Spaces J. All Protected Trees Including: b. Structure Locations g. Proposed Underground Utilities (I.) Diameter of 4.5' above grade (DBH) c, Driveways and Walks h. Zoning Setbacks (ii.) Surveyed Location d. Parking Arrangement i. All easements and Rights -of -Way . (iii.) Species e. Required Number of Parking Spaces (iv.) Diseased or Insect Infested Trees k. Tree Barricade Detail & Locations 2. Protective barriers are required around all trees remaining on site during construction. These barricades must remain intact during construction. The barriers must meet City Specifications. B) REPLACEMENTS 1. Tree replacement minimum standards: l0' overall height, 2.5" caliper, Florida Grade #1. See inspectors note below to determine the number of replacement trees required, Replacements required within 30 days. I hereby certify that as property owner or as representative of the property owner, I have verified that the tree(s) sought to be removed is wholly on property owned by the above - identified property owner, and should it be determined that the tree(s) are located wholly or partially on property owned by some other person, then, I agree to hold the City of Clearwater harmless In any claim made for wrongful removal of such tree(s). I hereby certify that this application together with any plans submitted is a true representation of all facts concerning the proposed removal of the tree(s). Any deviation from t ermit issued shall render it null and void and be considered a violation of the Community Development Code. ` J r�l 5 c_ .L/ CZ.S e c cJ Ignature of owner or applicant Printed Name /°o /3vX /G e Address '7A'Lt4 d u P2 i ey6 s F� 3 f3 ' City State Zip // 41✓,K.reJSS C'- •r- Agency Representing OCL # 77-7 Vo `, too z_ 2 3(5 3.2.0V Phone /Cell Fax DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - Not Valid Until Signed By City Manaaer or his Desianated Aaent Comments: Required Replacement Trees: Applicable Code Section: Based on the Inspector's comments and information submitted, the above removal application is: ❑ Approved as Submitted A Approved- Modified as Noted Above O Denied Signed: Date: 5 7 PF Communi Develop dent Coordinator or Designee /Inspector Valid for six months from the date of issuance. 1362.0001 -GC White - Planning & Development Services Yellow- Applicant Rev. 2 -03 Z O Qb 1 d L> U) D O m CITY OF CLEARWATER - FORESTRY DIVISION fl n 9_ TREE REMOVAL APPLICATION FORM rEPk�� NAME OF OWNER: 61zu m 2- & L C i S Af0Pf_,'7u Fee Rec. $ 0 I 1 / A Date Rec: _ �/Ii LOCATION OF WORK: r //Z AN p 1-i 11 m� 41/ Rec. By: Clearwater, FL Rec't # t 7 7 ------ or •_ Mn am"LW ramieimWL"P mm-ow.......��,... TREE REMOVAL PE REQUIRED REPLACEMENT TREES (� r NAME OF OWNER - OWNER'S ADDRESS w PHONE SITE ADDRESS LOCATION OF THE ON LOT i SPECIES AND NUMBER OF TREE(S) TO APPLICANT: A non - refundable fee of $ 15.00 for up to five trees to be removed, plus $3.00 for every tree above 5 to be removed is required. 33.14 REASON FOR REMOVAL: ❑ Construction hazardous • Declining • Dead • Other (Specify) Fee Recd. $ 15 — Receipt # /?,G Date G�� G4 1. For new construction, additions or other modifications of a property which Involve the removal of a protected tree(s), a site plan Is required. This site plan must have a minimum scale of 1' =20' for single family lots, or 1' =50' for all others. The site plan must include: a. Major Changes of Grade ± ` L All easements and Rights -of -Way b. Structure Locations J. All Protected Trees Including: c, Driveways and Walks "< `A (i.) Diameter of 4.5' above grade (DBH) d. Parking Arrangement Y ' (11.) Surveyed Location e. Required Number of Parking Spaces ! ? (iII,) Species f. Proposed Number of Parkin (iv.) Diseased or Insect Infested Trees P g Spaces g. Proposed Underground Utilities" f (0 Trees to be Removed h. Zoning Setbacks k, Tree Barricade Detail & Locations 2. Protective barriers are requlrt cl,dround all trees remaining on site during construction. These barricades must remain Intact during construction. The barriers musfi:meet City Specifications. ; 3. Tree replacement minlmum standards- 8' overall height, 2' caliper, Florida Grade # 1. See Inspectors note below to determine the number of replacement trees.requlred. I hereby certify that as property -dWner or as representative of the property owner, l have verified that the tree(s) sought to be removed is wholly on property owned by-the above - identified property owner; fond should It be determined that the tree(s) are located wholly of partially on property owned by some other person, then, I agree to hold the City of Clearwater harmless In any claim made for.wrongful removal of such tree(s). I hereby certify that this appllcation to- gether with any plans submitted Is a true representation of all facts concerning the proposed removal of the tree(s), Any deviation from the permit Issued shall, render It null and void and be considered Cl violation of Chapter 52, Code of Ordin es, SI nature of own6r or applicrlty; {': Printed Name ' Address Agency Representing (If Not Owner) City Staid Zip Phone DO NOT WRITE'BELOW THIS LINE = Not Valid Until Signed By City Manager or his Designated Agent Recommended Replacement Trees *`. Required Replacement Trees: / Applicable Code Section: - l 5 1 1 1{ f ,�• I Signed: �_4— Date Inspector Based on the Inspector's comments and informa do submitted, the above removal application Is: ❑ Approved as Submitted pproved - Modified as Noted Above 0 Denied Signed: c 1 t! (mil �"�� Date: � • / /' C� 1 City Manager or Designee CLEARWATER One 01)c One Future. Rita Garvey, Mayor- Commissioner Ed Hooper, Vice Mayor - Commissioner Bob Clark, Commissioner 1362.0001-GC J.B. Johnson, Jr., Commissioner Karen Seel, Commissioner 10-97 CITY OF CLEARWATER - PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TREE REMOVAL PERMIT NAME OF OWNER SITE ADDRESS ! c``'1 s ``- AJ . /! i : � . rt N �j PHONE OWNER'S ADDRESS LOCATION OF TREE(S) ON LOT SPECIES AND NUMBER OF TREE(S) _s TO APPLICANT: A non - refundable fee of $15.00 for up to five trees to be removed, plus $3.00 for every tree above 5 to be removed is required. REASON FOR REMOVAL: �Construction •See "A" below ❑ Hazardous ❑ Declining ❑ Dead ❑ Other (Specify) Fee Rec'd. $ tF v A) CONSTRUCTION Date /L 1. For new construction, additions or other modifcc.tic; 3 of a property which involve the removal of a protected tree(s), a site plan is required. This site plan must have a minimum scale of 1 " =20' for single family lots, or 1 " =50' for all others. The site plan must include' a. Major Changes of Grade f. Proposed Number of Parking Spaces j. All Protected Trees Including: b. Structure Locations g. Proposed Underground Utilities (i.) Diameter of 4.5' above grade (DBH) c, Driveways and Walks h. Zoning Setbacks (ii.) Surveyed Location d. Parking Arrangement I. All easements and Rights -of -Way . (iii.) Species e. Required Number of Parking Spaces (iv.) Diseased or Insect Infested Trees k. Tree Barricade Detail & Locations 2. Protective barriers are required around all trees remaining on site during construction. These barricades must remain intact during construction. The barriers must meet City Specifications. B) REPLACEMENTS 1. Tree replacement minimum standards: 10' overall height, 2.5" caliper, Florida Grade #1. See inspectors note below to determine the number of replacement trees required. Replacements required within 30 days. I hereby certify that as property owner or as representative of the property owner, I have verified that the tree(s) sought to be removed is wholly on property owned by the above - identified property owner, and should it be determined that the tree(s) are located wholly or partially on property owned by some other person, then, I agree to hold the City of Clearwater harmless in any claim made for wrongful removal of such tree(s). I hereby certify that this application together with any plans submitted is a true representation of all facts concerning the proposed removal of the tree(s). Any deviation fro //' e permit' ed shall render it null and void and be considered a violation of the Community Development Code. 1 Y�r� ��i.K�s ez ���i9G'j S'(y�c'� Signature of owner or applicant,,) Printed Name Address y� Agency Representing OCL # �- -7 'City State Zip Phone /Cell Fax DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - , J Not Valid Until Signed By City Manager or his Designated Agent ' i e •tors ommen s: (� I R quired Re lacement Trees: Agpii Based able Code Section:. on the Inspector's comments and information submitted, the above removal application is: ❑ Approved as Submitted Approved- Modified as Noted Above ❑ Denied Vin' / Signed: Date: f / Community evelopm nt Coordinator or Designee /Inspector Valid for six months from the date of issuance. 1362.0001 -GC White - Planning & Development Services Yellow - Applicant Rev. 2-03 Z O I_� w C 5 U) D O m Albee, Rick From: ttoto @bohlereng.com Sent! Wednesday, December 21, 2011 12:30 PM To: Albee, Rick Subject: RE: 1831 Highland Ave. Thank you Rick for all of your help with this. I appreciate the quick turn around time. Happy Holidays! From: Rick.Albee @myClearwater.com [ mailto :Rick.Albee @myClearwater.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 9;53 AM To: Tara Toto Subject: 1831 Highland Ave. Ta ra, I inspected the two laurel oak trees you asked me to assess. They are both of average health and condition. If these trees were to be preserved on a developed site they would need considerable space to insure their survivability. Since the site is so small I do not foresee them as candidates for preservation. They are not trees that the city could deny their removal. However, they do qualify for replacements on an inch for inch basis if removed. If the total inches removed from the site cannot be replaced on the site payment of $48.00 per inch to the tree fund will be required for any outstanding caliper inches. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you need any further information. Rick Albee 727 - 562 -4741 Land Resource Specialist City of Clearwater ISA Certified Arborist, SO -0989A WAL* ,MART SUSTAI'NABILITY _1 4 >~ CLUB WAL *MART NEIGHBORHOOD MARKET STORE #4667-00 jo N. HIGHLAND AVENUE & GREENLEA DRIVE d, CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA fl,qptjltf6 J FE s oot WAL *MART CLEARWATER u� Ervar n L7 Od ndandAmc lmhe, URBAN RESOURCE GROUP A 6ffW= a ~4MM w A%SKWt%.00. r, r URBAN RESOURCE GROUP A DIVISION OF KIMLEY -HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. April 2, 2007 Ms. Rebekah Rodriguez Senior Design Manager Wal -Mart Stores, Inc. 2001 SE 10h Street Bentonville, AR 72716 -0550 RE: Job #047253467, Wal -Mart Clearwater, Store No. 4667 -00, NSC Dear Ms. Rodriguez: Urban Resource Group, a division of Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. (URG/KHA) performed a limited field observation on January 3, 2007 to review existing trees affected by the proposed construction. The evaluation was based upon a proposed site plan dated December 7, 2006, provided by KHA with existing tree locations based on a survey (Dated November 15, 2006) provided by Phoenix Land Surveying and Engineering, LLC. Each protected tree was photographed, measured, and evaluated based on existing conditions. The above referenced observations were not intended to be exhaustive or to extend to every aspect of the proposed construction. Observations were limited to spot checking, selective measurement, and similar methods of general observation of the protected trees based on URG's exercise of professional judgment. The purpose of URG's site visit was to provide the Client a greater degree of confidence in deciding what efforts should be made to protect, remove, or relocate existing trees affected by the proposed construction. URG shall not be responsible for the acts or omissions of any contractor, subcontractors, suppliers, or of any other individual or entity performing or furnishing any work for the project site described herein. URG certifies that all of the statements in this report are true, complete, and convect - to the best of URG's knowledge based on above ground, visual field observations conducted on January 3, 2007. URG's compensation is not contingent upon a predetermined value or direction of value that favors any party in this case. URG has no present or prospective interest in the trees that are the subject of this report, and has no personal interest or bias with respect to the parties involved. The following report is comprised of background information provided to support the tree observations. If you have any questions, or need any additional information, please contact Chris Hice. Sincerely, URBAN RESOURCE GROUP A Divioilgh of Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. Christopher ice, ISA Certified Arborist, FL -5363A URBAN & DEVELOPMENT PLANNING • LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE - SITE GRAPHICS 2601 Cattlemen Road, Suite 500, Sarasota, FL 34232 voice: 941.926.1730 • fax: 941.922.2351 CONTENTS TreeEvaluation Methodology ............................................ ............................... 1 Survey............................................................................ ............................... 1 AerialPhoto .................................................................. ............................... 1 Cityof Clearwater Coordination ........................................... ............................... 1 Tree Inventory Plan. ... .. 111........ 11111111... 111..........1....... 111111111. 1.....1. 11111111111. 1...... Z ProtectedTrees .............................................................. ............................... 3 HazardousTrees ............................................................ ............................... 3 TreeCondition Evaluation ................................................ ............................... 4 Justificationof Tree Removal ............................................ ............................... 4 TreePreservation Plan ..................................................... ............................... 4 TreeReplacement Calculations .......................................... ............................... 5 TreeCare/Pruning Guidelines ............................................ ............................... 5 Equipment ...................................... ..........0.................... 7 Summary...................................................................... ............................... 7 Definitions................................................................:... ............................... 9 Appendix 1— Survey of Existing Conditions Appendix 2 — Aerial Photo Appendix 3 — Tree Inventory Plan, Tree Preservation Plan, Landscape Plans/Details; and Color Rendered Landscape Plan Appendix 4 — Tree Condition Evaluation Form Appendix 5 — Tree Summary Spreadsheet Appendix 6 — Existing Tree Photographs Tree Observation Report Prepared by Christopher M. Hice, ISA — Certified Arborist (FL 5363SA) All tree measurement and inspection data for this report was collected during site observations conducted on January 3, 2007. F/ -.,, ,t Tree Evaluation Methodology This tree observation report is based on guidelines provided in the City of Clearwater Community Development Code, as well as the Guide for Plant Appraisal, 9t' Edition, as established by the Council of Tree and Landscape Appraisers (CTLA). CTLA is a consortium of seven national trade, educational, and scientific associations, including the International Society of Arboriculture, The American Society of Consulting Arborists, the National Arborist Association, the American Society of Landscape Architects, the Association of Consulting Foresters of America, and the Associated Landscape Contractors of America (now known as Professional Landcare Network). Survey The proposed project site is greater than one (1) acre in area, and therefore requires a topographical survey of the property to be provided to the City of Clearwater. Observations were made based on a survey (dated November 15, 2006) provided by Phoenix Land Surveying and Engineering, LLC. The survey is provided in Appendix 1 of this report and shows the location and size of all protected trees and palms. Aerial Photo Due to the season of our site observations, aerial photos were used to help determine the health and vigor of some of the canopies that were bare from the fall foliage drop. An example of an aerial photo with the proposed site layout is provided in Appendix 2 of this report. City of Clearwater Coordination URG began coordinating with the City of Clearwater primarily via phone and email to discuss code clarification, the overall scale of the project and any potential conflicts with the City's codes and goals as they pertained to tree removal and tree preservation. Rick Albee has been the primary contact for the City of Clearwater, and is a representative of the Land Resources Department as well as the Building Plan Review Committee (BPRC). Mr. Albee was able to meet URG's ISA- Certified Arborist at the site on January 8t', 2007 to discuss preliminary findings and concerns with the existing trees and the impacts that proposed construction may have. URG and Mr. Albee had previously discussed two (2) tree evaluation methods, one (1) provided by Mr. Albee, and one (1) provided by URG. After brief discussion it was agreed that URG's tree evaluation method was acceptable and would be used for the purposes of this observation. At the conclusion of the meeting on January 8th, 2007, Mr. Albee elected to have the existing trees reviewed by another arborist. After that evaluation it was conveyed to URG that "It was determined that these trees can become hazardous and should be removed. Replacements will be calculated on a tree for tree basis, not an inch for inch." Further Mr. Albee stated "The tree for tree replacement will be for the B &B trees planted with the previous landscape planting. All other trees will be inch for inch if they are rated at 50% (Average) and above. Declining trees do not need to be replaced." URG's evaluation method does not provide an average rating, therefore for the purposes of this project any tree rated in "Poor" condition is considered to be a declining tree. Trees rated "fair" or better were calculated in the replacement calculations. See "Tree Condition Evaluation" below for further clarification on URG's evaluation methods. With the above communications from Mr. Albee, URG has prepared a Tree Inventory Plan (Sheet L100), a Tree Preservation Plan (Sheet L101) and Landscape Plans & Details (Sheets L102 and L103). These plans are included in Appendix 3 of this report. Please refer to the Tree Page 1 Preservation Plan for explanation of the requirements on an inch for inch basis as well as a tree for tree basis. Tree Inventory Plan The Tree Inventory Plan was prepared under the direction of an ISA- Certified Arborist (FL- 5363A) and consists of all existing trees four (4) inches Diameter Breast Height (DBH) and greater specifying the species, size, average canopy spread (see drip line, fig. 1), and condition of such trees. Please refer to the Tree Inventory Plan for more detailed information regarding tree removal /replacement calculations and tree barricade locations. Dripline means an imaginary line along the ground which reflects the perimeter of the crown of a tree extended vertically to the ground. Page 2 Protected Trees Per Article 8, Section 8 -102 of the City of Clearwater Community Development Code: • Protected tree means any non - hazardous tree other than a prohibited tree of four (4) inches DBH or greater, and any palm with a ten (10) foot clear trunk. • Specimen tree means any tree which is determined to be of high value to the community because of its type, size, age, and exceptional quality. • Specimen tree stand means a contiguous grouping or cluster of trees which has been determined to be of high value based upon one or more of the following: o The relative maturity and even age of the stand; o The purity of the tree species composing the stand; o The rare or unusual nature of the stand; and o The aesthetic quality of the stand and so designated by the community development coordinator Based on URG's site observations, no observations were made that would designate an individual tree as a potential specimen tree. Two (2) areas qualify as specimen tree stands and are specified on the Tree Preservation Plan. Both specimen tree stands are outside of the demising line between Wal -Mart and the seller retained property and the overall project property line. All existing trees that were observed were considered to be protected before the condition evaluation was performed. Hazardous Trees Per Article 8, Section 8 -102 of the City of Clearwater Community Development Code: Hazardous tree means a tree that constitutes a hazard to life or has a significant potential to cause injury to persons or damage to property as the tree is in imminent danger of falling, or is otherwise considered to be or likely to create a hazard. A hazardous tree shall include but not be limited to dead, diseased, broken, split, cracked, leaning and uprooted trees. A hazardous tree shall also include a tree harboring communicable diseases or insects of a type that could infest and cause the decline of adjacent trees. Through careful consideration and observations, as well as ongoing communications with Mr. Albee, it was determined that trees in the existing parking islands may become hazardous and should be removed. As agreed with Mr. Albee the replacement requirements for these trees was calculated on a tree for tree basis, rather than an inch for inch basis, which is typically required. While no existing trees considered to be hazardous were observed during URG's site observations, URG stresses that there is no such thing as a "Safe Tree ", and bears no responsibility regarding the safety of the existing trees observed. Page 3 Tree Condition Evaluation URG utilized the "Tree Condition Evaluation Form" (Approved by the City of Clearwater) to determine the specific condition points for each physical attribute described below. Evaluations were based upon visual observation from the ground surface only. A sample copy of the Tree Condition Evaluation form can be found in Appendix 4 of this report. 1. Roots (above ground visual observation) 2. Trunk 3. Limb and branch structure 4. Twigs 5. Foliage Based on the above attributes URG established a "Tree Condition Ranking" (Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor) determined from the sum of the condition points. Detailed information based on the results of URG's observations is located on the Tree Inventory Plan and in a spreadsheet format in Appendix 5 of this report. Photographs of evaluated trees are provided in Appendix 6 of this report Justification of Tree removal Based on URG's observations and conclusions above, it is URG's opinion that it would not be ideal for any excavation to take place within the driplines of the existing trees which are to remain. The impact of construction for the trees within the areas of construction disturbance has the potential to significantly inhibit the health and survivability both during and after construction, and all activities should be monitored. While the existing trees are established, it is URG's opinion that potential construction activities could result in loss of a significant amount of their root systems, and the amount of oxygen and water currently available in the existing soil where feeder roots remain. Potential conflicts and tree survivability may present a substantial concern that could outweigh the advantages to preserving or relocating the trees in question. Due to the condition of the trees determined to be replaced on a tree for tree basis it is not recommended that transplanting be considered as an option. Tree Preservation Plan The Tree Preservation Plan was prepared under the direction of an ISA- Certified Arborist (FL- 5363A). The Tree Preservation Plan specifies how each tree is to be protected and identifies how site development impacts the critical root zones (driplines) and how to address these impacts, i.e. crown elevating, root pruning and/or root aeration systems. The Tree Preservation Plan specifies the tree barricade limits (two- thirds of the drip line and in the root prune lines, if any), and the tree barricade construction specifications and other pertinent tree preservation information and methods. The total amount of DBH removed from the project site shall be replaced on an inch - for -inch basis, except as previously mentioned and as shown on the Tree Preservation Plan. Replacement trees shall be a minimum of four (4) caliper (see fig. 2) inches providing for one - inch caliper total replacement for each one -inch DBH removed. Any number of trees may be utilized to meet the inch - for -inch requirement, provided that acceptable spacings and design are maintained. Replacement palms shall have a clear and straight trunk of ten feet. Page 4 Caliper means the measurement of young or nursery trees and is measured at a height six inches above the ground or soil level for trees up to and including four inches in caliper and 12 inches above the ground for larger trees. Any landscaping required to be installed by section 3 -1202 or 3 -1203 may be used as credit against tree replacement requirements. (See Landscape Plans & Details, Sheets L102, and L103). Tree Replacement Calculations It is the intent of the City of Clearwater to establish minimum landscaping/tree protection standards in order to promote the preservation of existing tree canopies, to promote the expansion of that canopy and to promote the enhancement of the quality of existing and future development in the city. Tree removal /replacement calculations for this project are located on the Tree Preservation Plan. Tree Care/Pruning Guidelines In an effort to meet the intent of the proposed project, all proposed trees and existing trees to remain should not be topped, shaped or severely pruned, and should be allowed to grow to maturity and attain their natural form so that crown (see fig. 3) development is not inhibited. Page 5 DIAMETER - 0 6" SUM TOTAL OF 6" IN INCHES THE DIAMETER OF ALL STEMS GRADE IN INCHES GRADE SINGLE - STEMMED TREE MULTI- STEMMED TREE Figure 2 - Caliper Caliper means the measurement of young or nursery trees and is measured at a height six inches above the ground or soil level for trees up to and including four inches in caliper and 12 inches above the ground for larger trees. Any landscaping required to be installed by section 3 -1202 or 3 -1203 may be used as credit against tree replacement requirements. (See Landscape Plans & Details, Sheets L102, and L103). Tree Replacement Calculations It is the intent of the City of Clearwater to establish minimum landscaping/tree protection standards in order to promote the preservation of existing tree canopies, to promote the expansion of that canopy and to promote the enhancement of the quality of existing and future development in the city. Tree removal /replacement calculations for this project are located on the Tree Preservation Plan. Tree Care/Pruning Guidelines In an effort to meet the intent of the proposed project, all proposed trees and existing trees to remain should not be topped, shaped or severely pruned, and should be allowed to grow to maturity and attain their natural form so that crown (see fig. 3) development is not inhibited. Page 5 Figure 3 - Crown Crown means all branch parts of a tree, including all stems, twigs and foliage. Proposed replacement trees which are balled and burlapped must have the burlap removed or folded down at the time of planting. All twine or rope must be removed. If wire baskets are used, the upper rows must be cut and removed from the planting pit before planting. If stakes or guy wires are used to support a tree, the wire must be covered with protective material where it is in contact with the tree and the stakes or guy wires must be removed after one year. URG suggests two (2) site observation visits by a certified arborist or landscape architect to ensure proper planting procedures.are followed. One (1) site visit immediately after installation and one (1) site visit after all stakes and guy wires have been removed. Proposed replacement trees and existing trees to remain should have an annual maintenance plan adopted and implemented for general maintenance and pruning. Any maintenance plan identifying pruning and other methods of tree care should comply with ANSI A300 and should be monitored by a certified arborist. Page 6 Equipment The Opti -Logic LHA -series Laser Rangefinder/Hypsometer height measurement system combines a pulsed laser rangefinder and a vertical angle sensor. Incorporating an internal electronic tilt sensor, the Laser Rangefinder/Hypsometer makes vertical angle measurements with better than one (1) degree resolution to remotely determine object heights. Applications of the hypsometer measurement system include tree height measurements, construction, utilities, architectural measurements, landscaping, real estate appraisal, and much more. The OPTi -LOGIC 400LHA Laser Range Finder was used during URG's site observations to measure the existing trees by shooting the distance, and angle (to top of tree) to determine tree height as well as canopy spread. Summary This report has been prepared in accordance with the professional standard of care. No other warranties or guarantees, express or implied, are made or intended. URG was retained to perform a limited tree observation, and performed only those tasks specifically stated in URG's scope of services. This report has been prepared solely for Wal -Mart Stores, Inc. for the purpose stated herein and should not be relied upon by any other party for any other purpose. Specifically, this report may not be used in connection with actual renovation or construction of any kind without first obtaining the appropriate permits. The conclusions in this report are based on the limited observation described above. Any reliance on this report by any party other than Wal -Mart Stores, Inc. shall be without liability to URG or its employees. The Client may use this report as part of its due diligence, but this report should not be used as the sole basis for the Client's decision making. We endeavored to research site development issues and constraints to the extent practical given the scope, budget, and schedule agreed to with the Client. Our assessment is based in large part on information provided to us by Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. and therefore is only as accurate and complete as the information provided to us. This report is based on our knowledge as of March 13, 2007 and is based on the desires of the Client that have been specifically disclosed to us. New issues may arise during development because of changes in governmental rules and policy, changed circumstances, or unforeseen conditions URG affirms that URG's opinions have been made in total good faith, based on the facts presented during URG's field review, with no coercion from others. URG further affirms that that URG has no interest with the parties or people involved with this issue or any interest with regard to the outcome. URG's responsibility to Wal -Mart Stores, Inc. and Public Trust ends with this report. URG has no responsibility to inspect or ensure any or all of the recommendations made in this report are executed, planned, or implemented. This report does not fall under the category of Privileged Information or Confidential Work Product. To simplify information in this report, it is sometimes necessary to use trade names of products, equipment, and firms. No endorsement is intended, nor is criticism implied of similar products, equipment, and firms which are not mentioned. Page 7 Trees of concern were observed for highly visible and patent signs or symptoms of stress or decline. Problems not apparent upon visual observations cannot be and were not noted. All trees of concern that are to remain should be monitored on an annual basis for new or deteriorating conditions. Page 8 Definitions City of Clearwater, Community Development Code Article 8, Section 8 -102 Arboriculture means the care and maintenance of trees. Coniferous means a tree belonging to a group of mostly evergreen trees that bear true cones or arillate fruit. Critical root zone means the rooting area of a tree, within the tree's dripline, which if injured or otherwise disturbed is likely to directly affect a tree's chance for survival. Crown means all branch parts of a tree, including all stems, twigs and foliage. Diameter breast height (DBH) means a measurement of mature trees and is measured at a height four and one -half feet above the ground or soil level. Dripline means an imaginary line along the ground which reflects the perimeter of the crown of a tree extended vertically to the ground. Hazardous tree means a tree that constitutes a hazard to life or has a significant potential to cause injury to persons or damage to property as the tree is in imminent danger of falling, or is otherwise considered to be or likely to create a hazard. A hazardous tree shall include but not be limited to dead, diseased, broken, split, cracked, leaning and uprooted tree. A hazardous tree shall also include a tree harboring communicable diseases or insects of a type that could infest and cause the decline of adjacent trees. Palm tree means a self - supporting, fibrous- stemmed monocotyledon plant of the family Arecaceae (Palmae). Prohibited tree means Punk.(cajeput) tree - Melaleuca quinquenervia also known as Melaleuca leucodendron; Brazilian pepper - Schinus terebinthifolius; Australian Pine - Casuarina equisetifolia; and Chinese Tallow - Sapium sebiferum. Protected tree means any non - hazardous tree other than a prohibited tree of four (4) inches DBH or greater. Remove or removal means the actual removal of a protected tree or causing the effective removal through damaging, poisoning, excessive pruning, or other direct or indirect actions resulting in the death of a protected tree. Shade tree means a self - supporting, woody plant which normally grows to a minimum height of 35 feet in the county, has a trunk which can be maintained with over eight feet of clear wood, and which is of a species having an average mature spread of cover greater than 25 feet. Specimen tree means any tree which is determined to be of high value to the community because of its type, size, age, exceptional quality, or other professional criteria, and so designated by the community development coordinator. Page 9 Specimen tree stand means a contiguous grouping or cluster of trees which has been determined to be of high value based upon one or more of the following: a. The relative maturity and even age of the stand; b. The purity of the tree species composing the stand; c. The rare or unusual nature of the stand; and d. The aesthetic quality of the stand and so designed by the community development coordinator. Topping means utilizing inter -nodal cuts to remove the vertical leader stems on protected trees. Tree means any erect standing woody plant, together with its root system, of a species which normally attains a minimum overall height at maturity of at least 15 feet in the Clearwater area. Page 10 APPENDIX SURVEY ®r EXISTING C9nDITI9nS APPENDIX Z AERIAL Pfl °T° APPENDIX 3 TREE INVET°RY PLAN TREE PRESERVATI °N PLAN LANDSCAPE PLANS /DETAILS C9L 9R RENDERED LANDSCAPE PLAN APPENDIX I TREE C°nDITI °n IVALUATI °n rgRm TREE CONDITION EVALUATION FORM A tree's condition is determined from the sum of the condition points established from the rating of a tree's roots, trunk, limb/branch structure, twigs and foliage. The condition ratings range from excellent to poor and are determined by a condition point system that weights problems identified on each component of the tree. The condition point system is structured as follows: no apparent problems (4 points), minor Problems (3 points), major problems (2 points) and extreme problems (1 point). ROOTS • Root anchorage • Restricted root system relative to canopy • Mechanical injury • Girdling roots • Compaction or water - logged roots • Presence of insects or diseases Condition points TRUNK Condition • Sound bark and wood, no cavities 15 -17 • Upright trunk (well tapered) Fair • Included bark between codominant stems • Mechanical or fire injury • Cracks • Swollen or sunken area • Presence of insect and disease Condition points LIMB AND BRANCH STRUCTURE • Strong attachments, no included bark • Free of decay and cavities • Well proportioned, good form • Wound closure • Dead limbs/epicormic sprouting • Presence of decay, insects and diseases Condition points TWIGS • Shoot vigor compared to past 3 -year growth • Presence of weak or dead twigs • Presence of insects and diseases Condition points FOLIAGE • Normal appearance (size, color, density) • Nutrient deficiencies • Herbicidal, chemical injury symptoms • Wilted or dead leaves • Presence of insect or diseases Condition points Total Condition Points TREE CONDITION RANKING (The ranking does not incorporate a wood density evaluation of the root collar and includes an evaluation of the tree's canopy from the ground surface only) Total Points Condition 18 -20 Excellent 15 -17 Good 12 -14 Fair 11 or less Poor APPENDIX 5 TREE SUMMARY SPREADSMICT TREE CONDITION EVALUATION TREE # Species DBH Circumference Height Spread Tree Condition Ranking Status 1 Live Oak 20 63 35 45 Fair Removed 2 Live Oak 17 53 35 39 Fair Removed 3 Live Oak 15 47 23 36 Fair Removed 4 Live Oak 13 41 26 34 Poor Removed 5 Live Oak 13 41 23 30 Poor Removed 6 Cabba a Palm 14 44 14 15 Excellent Remain 7 Cabbage Palm 15 47 17 15 Excellent Remain 8 Cabbage Palm 15 47 14 15 Excellent Remain 9 Cabbage Palm 12 38 7 15 Excellent Remain 10 Cabba a Palm 12 38 2 15 Excellent Remain 11 Live Oak 11 35 24 29 Fair Removed 12 Slash Pine 14 44 60 25 Good Removed 13 Slash Pine 15 47 63 23 Good Remain 14 _ Slash Pine 15 47 61 24 Good Remain 15 Slash Pine 19 60 62 22 Good Remain 16 Pine 11 35 62 10 Good Remain 17 Slash Pine 14 44 66 24 Good Remain 18 Slash Pine_ 14 44 68 25 Good Remain 19 Live Oak 17 53 30 37 Fair Removed 20 Live Oak 18 57 37 44 Fair Removed 21 Live Oak -_ 15 47 35 42 Poor _ Removed 22 Live Oak 15 47 35 36 Fair Removed 23 Live Oak 13 41 20 25 Fair Removed 24 Live Oak 13 41 26 25 _ _ Good Removed 25 Live Oak 15 47 30 33 Good Remain 26 Live Oak 11 35 27 28 Fair Remain 27 Live Oak 14 44 32 29 Fair Remain 28 Live Oak 12 38 33 30 Fair Remain 29 Live Oak 11 35 31 - _ 29 _ Fair Remain 30 Live Oak 14 44 27 33 Fair Removed 31 Live Oak 13 41 30 27 Fair Removed 32 Live Oak 11 35 24 28 Fair Removed 33 Live Oak 31 18 25 Poor Removed 34 Live Oak 14 44 26 32 Poor Removed 35 Live Oak 13 41 27 33 Poor Removed 36 Live Oak 12 38 24 27 Fair Removed 37 Live Oak 14 44 29 34 Fair Removed 38 Live Oak 15 47 25 29 Fair Removed 39 Live Oak 16 - 50 31 32 - Fair Removed 40 Live Oak 16 50 39 33 Fair Removed 41 Live Oak 15 47 34 32 Fair Removed 42 Live Oak 15 47 27 34 Poor Removed 43 Live Oak 12 38 27 33 Poor Removed 44 Live Oak 9 28 18 24 Fair Removed 45 Live Oak 9 28 20 23 Poor Removed 46 Live Oak 15 47 25 32 Poor Removed 47 Live Oak 20 63 36 40 Fair Removed 48 Live Oak 19 60 37 46 Poor Removed 49 Live Oak 17 53 33 39 Poor Removed 50 Live Oak 13 41 28 32 Fair Removed 51 Live Oak 11 35 33 32 Fair Removed 52 Live Oak 12 38 26 34 Fair Removed 53 Live Oak 10 31 27 26 Poor Removed 54 Cabbage Palm 12 38 20 15 Excellent Relocated 55 Cabbage Palm 10 31 20 15 Excellent Relocated 56 Live Oak 12 38 27 31 Fair Removed 57 Live Oak 16 50 28 33 Fair Removed 58 Live Oak -_ 9 28 22 24 Fair Removed 59 Live Oak 14 44 28 30 Fair Removed 60 Cabbage Palm 12 38 20 15 Excellent Relocated 61 Cabbage Palm _- -_ -- 9 28 20 15 Excellent Relocated 62 Cabbage Palm 11 35 19 15 Excellent Relocated 63 Cabbage Palm 12 38 18 15 Excellent Relocated 64 Laurel oak 13 41 24 31 Poor Removed 65 Cabbacie Palm 13 41 5 15 Excellent Remain 66 Live Oak 14 44 28 37 Fair Removed 67 Cabbage Palm 16 50 6 15 Excellent Remain 68 Live Oak 13 41 29 35 Fair Removed 69 1 Live Oak 13 41 28 35 Fair Removed 70 Live Oak 9 28 24 26 Fair Removed 71 Live Oak 8 -_ -_ 25 22 22 Fair Removed 72 Live Oak 8 25 21 22 Poor Removed 73 Chinese Elm 8 25 19 20 Fair Removed 74 Tree Not on Site - - - - - - 75 Cabbage Palm 18 57 9 15 Good Remain 76 Live Oak 13 41 30 26 Fair Remain 77 Water Oak 10 31 26 20 Poor Removed 78 Water Oak - - 43 41 Fair Remain 79 Formosa Sweet um 13 41 38 19 Good Remain 80 Slash Pine 18 57 62 32 Good Remain 81 Formosa Sweet um 14 44 41 25 Good Remain 82 Live Oak 28 88 51 62 Good Remain 83 Water Oak 14 44 38 48 Fair Removed 84 Slash Pine 19 60 65 42 Good Remain 85 Water Oak 13 41 32 47 Poor Removed 86 Cabbage Palm 9 28 16 15 Excellent Relocated 87 Carolina Laurel Cherry - - 25 25 Excellent Remain 88 Jacaranda - - 40 26 Excellent Remain 89 Jacaranda - - 47 47 Excellent Remain APPENDIX G 1XISTINQ TREE Pfl9T9GRAPMS re SErvati In WIVAL--.IMAARI CLLA.RWAILF4 E ort PP- M n bb - wd A%ooaw& Inc. URBAN RESOURCE GROUP - - -------------- * TI re $ErUQt1 n WAL•MAR7 CLEARWAILH V+ [ C: M _._. n zrd,Lssocats, Inc URBAN RESOURCE GROUP YE sErvati J, TRUE 10 Inc URBAN RESOURCE GROUP YE WVAt-•IMART CLLARWATFR 6 Ort OP URBAN RESOURCE GROUP FREE 3 ,w TRtr r PEE SCET�fT1yQ��1 n� WAL-MART CLEARWATER G Cf i URBAN RESOURCE GROUP 1 •F1Yptl M uw;l � r+w� am A,91KI 1i/, �u TR Er 17 YE .SETUQti n WAL -MAHI CLEAIiWArEH C ( [ pp�mn Krrop)•Klm �= crd.SS°,� F- -.Inv URBAN RESOURCE GROUP t Ix .;q .sFrvuti n WALMARTCLEARWAIEF V :Y y rt' URBAN RESOURCE GROUP a sm+oa. a uw:a, »sn ua a.eeuis ne R[t C pp, mn "Rxn &� = mdk%mab�. inc URBAN RESOURCE GROUP 4� 7s WA&MART CLEARWAXFR PI- M" Kv*ft hh� = am Inc UR a AN Picture of Tree 29 unavailable Jr it WVA I A 11', 71(.11 1114 le' E rfoJ �rt TRU Ml N I 'WiVAw- Y€ sEruali 17 WIVAL-MARI CLEARWAtER TRr-r- , --v L a, f IM " Kmoey+k)m bb- Ml A%oca---,In URBAN RESOURCE GROUP r I r f WAL-MART CLEARWATER •J; TREE `t1 Yec SEruafi WAL•MAR7 CLEARWATER \, (l UI ( �) ..... ................_.............. r_Fj KimleyHorn and Associates, Inc. URBAN RESOURCE GROUP A DIVISION OF NIMS -HOAN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. t THE TKU `t 3 1 qw- re SErvati X11. W /AL -MART CLEARWATER V [ �.m ntYdAmOGatG5: Inc URBAN RESOURCE GROUP YES SErVati n WfV C V� AL•MARY CLEARWA-tFF4 ort TREE 49 TR U5 50 r YE sfrvah nx WAL-MARI CLIARWA►ER V rt y URBAN RESOURCE GROUP ;,E., YF sEruati nj WAL•,NANT CLLANWAIEF[ f t/ r!mm© &idA55cldmW& c URBAN RESOURCE GROUP . awa a we+r.� uur.awcwm, se. re sEruati n W /nL-MARI CLLARWAILS F �1r � = � Inc. URBAN RESOURCE GROUP YF ��T V ffI L �l WAL•MART CC,.FARWA)FH fDVrt r]l URBAN RESOURCE690UP a RmL6! d ull{ /� IsSMfli �W 1Y16C1YlEt, q( WAL MART CLEARWATLH f V F-I ©mm© 81d A2lu2mW , WIC. URBAN RE$OURCEGROUP Y� SfTt1Q�1.1�1 WnL•MAR7 CLLARWAILH F Urt !I�© �n,�S6600�5, iI1G URBAN RESOURCE GROUP I re sCCFrjva��i n ~� WAL -MART CLEARWATER G Vl I J 7� i i C =" Kr"Hyn B� aW Ate. Inc. URBAN RESOURCE GROUP omLtr a+ wa.iw, ..o J, rE 'E WIVAL•PMIART CLEARWAFER E Cir�t P-k�mn and k bm URBAN RESOURCE GROUP re sErvati n W'VJA L -MA I � I C I I A -VIOA I L H £0r i r On- URBAN RESOURCE GROUP �« \�.��� rE W14AL•MARI CLLAKWATf H E Xrt TRU SG clmmn =kr- URBAN RESOURCE GROUP S ITti Ua ln WAL-MA11.1 CIIA�'.%-Alll, OF Or PP'Mn Km,:-y.HVyr bb- = and A&,.rc n=s. if URBAN RESOURCE GROUP Ervaff WAL *MART CLEARWATER G RIF V M� o % B g i B � B [M Wil l a I I >_ a4 it LAME LIN G 3 - r �i 1 Ig li I, I I I I � � i i 1 1 1sr� I x I I I 1 I 1 1 s- - - °= -------------------- w - ------------- - - - - -- -- •----------------- ---- - - - - -- _ -- — ---- ___---- - - - - -- � i M � � 1 o is .7 IZMMV I '4 Xe :s•" i s L = l .........., ��,,,,,' �'`a\ I� No 4n. dtle7t. 3 I o m 7 05 r..rw T7 \1 I tt•A fAftltt.'f ig I •� JNCI UAED ..� �. f ..o r B �_�_ i as aoac usa. �2a i t I r ., _ PIP 1• &a N. 20' � 1a111 u CIP NO R) v ,jt „iii FOLP r�soa r y /noi ,aa1�f ..j...j.. j'�..j�i.. g ". T — — — — .— + - -- c' - ...•_r rr.wwr ...�. o � i � I I ' ILLr 7 k 7171 11li1N NA1l .. Q /'SdR Poilal r o` •••®"••�• �g ar2:aar s4CtA tear, OR 7.te Y ' I Ck .. * * �- AM Or A.T. tat 0. • — SOP n mil. 1- 1 NO �- a L I I I — 1 x 01.1.0:— ENLEA DRIVE, t � 1 • I I of �� E H 1O 1s oil a: �I�IYI� } Ll9 N fJ z H co X w O Q � w J z o w z w _ Q cif N W Q w z �O � LU J 0 v z Z5 wIE PROJECT Na ° 'D 60 03/08/07 I— SHEET KVMM GRAPRC SCALE vIQ g O 4 I , I iL ff jww E KIM. A I& v :IF 23 0 gaox er O LwL 05 c/) < 0 < 0 < Lj (D z < Lu <Lu� �LL o z < U)!5 LLJ -1 6 c-) U E?- Z f) "v 03/07/2007 PROJECT NO. 047253651 SHEET NUMBER ----- -------------------- - F k X tM- Ill ..11 I t I t j `�I 1 fi ` 11 1 p� a -�l r I 0 L6 I i �, �`-7a �,k♦nrx �* - -- "lViS ° � / I S � �� i �`- � I Ile i- 4 �y ♦ p f - Cl, __� ' L` ♦. - L CJ<g �I i F .� .— -] j 1/ , A E THE TREE9.I14 THIS AREA Q j - j SHOULD N Be AFFE:OTET! or; by 5k ON CONSTRIIION AND wERE } - �'� p .i I k N.T �iYALUATED. •' , f ` � ... � � ,i � � '� � __`_ - - � � p F . $Q i 1 _ I d PINES iHIS' GROW! OF SLASH!, +f IB CO►�IDERED TO Sk t �' I' �r I'' • `/ �`.� `�e I i S: _. .- -- _ _ _ I I A SPRIMEN TREE STAl1iD `- O 0 . SEE TREE PIMSERVATmON PLAN (uof) FaoR r+c� P g ° I IN THIS AREA '...I 'kk u' �. p- ,�./1 . n ' e I a, .__1 � � I f_i .. M• SIE'Y405 �7'�'j //�' \) \ \�� \\ t,.v 'c � ( I�( i I �, p 4 ;• i 1 i * . I � � � �� ter_ � � i I I I B .': I I II ` � * * —` ''� sir •. lEI0h190RigOL1kUAl�i I 1:-_ �,.._..�_s � � ._ C G!!S FINISHED Fl "...w.a0F7NOW [: 9v400 ,. ••• •• !' `�� / _ �, . caasSHUILUracsavnREworncr6 .aa.72nsF I ! l �, i ✓�,kL.•�_�.�...an.. /. I' S �,4 _ O� ` _ 1 CV40p ire '® i<L ! 1 y •Id I `� a G 'TN1916ROYJP OFISASAL'- w` I I .� � •_.��s� 4i �F � - � �¢ � i - R((�� !I IA _ .� r�l� I. I d PALMS AND LIVE C2MCG WAS I It !_ 1 B LI E P (NOT 14D11VIDUALL7 '�_ t'bli - ® - -� f Y _ G EVALUATED, 11SiJT ARE; M J/, - t HOOD CLXIPITION_ AND t A5 DErE MED, DT THE CITY OF aEAR aM REIMMENTATI t CONSIDERED TtO !SE A v. O` --moo; ♦ ; b 6 - F. JK VE, TREES riOLL AE' .. t SPECIMkEN TREE STAND. , :, - r-1 - 'i I'' REPLAOED TREE FOR THEE NO Nor• Il FOR INCH. TRIM FOUND IN POOR COr101TlON ARE NOT RIMUMM TO LSE REPLlill EEE TREE PRESERVATION I! e s I TREE NO. 74 WAS SLIOhRI ON SURVk1, 8UT WA9 NDf PRES@IT DIJreItiG, 1HE flEIA Pow Fax MIT WATK}N E� t *i I -. ���' �' p �i cewrat sraE vT ON �wiARr a, soot AND 15 NOT �oot�tteD Fore ON sae t M Tills REPLACIVIENT CALCULATION. M d was a TM NO. 8T' THROI1G,Il e9 ARE FMED IN AND APPM TO BE OFF -MM ' I I TIEE COPDRII IN EYAI.WTION 1 TREES ' OBti - Orca+iterenoe Fld eod Tee Car,7itian Ranld Slow t Lhi Oak 20 63 35 45 Fair R —W 2 lira Oak 17 53 36 39 Far Rlmwad 3 Liw Oak 15 47 23 36 For Rxarad 4 U. Oak 13' 41 28 34 Poor Rxriouad - 5 Lhe Oak 73 41 23 30 Pow Rxriouod 6 Pain 14 m 14 15 - ExceOwa Remus 7 " Ciltta Pain 15 47 17 15 Exoe6ant Ronairl 6 Pak. 15 47 14 15 E.eau nt Rena'. 9 Palen 112 38 7 15 E—I ee Fill 10 Pain 12 38 2 is Erotlie t Ballots 11 Lw Oak 11 35 - 24 28 Feb Rewired 12 Slash Pine 14 44 60 25 - 'GO,ki Rr mneit 13 Slash Pine 15 47 63 2i Goad Raman 14 Stash Pine- 15 47 61 24 Oood R- 1s Sleets Pine � 19 60 62 22 Goa Rill t6 Slash Rra 11 35 62 to Goad Remora 17 Slash Phe 14 m 66 39 Good lit —aid 16 Srash Pine 14 m 68 2i Good Raman 19 Lhe Oak 17 53 30 37 Fail Rcmmred 20 Line Oak 18 57 37 44 Far R:+rio.W 21 U. Oak 15 47 35 42 Pow RerrorW 22 Lro Oak 15 47 35 36 Far Removed 23 Live Oak 13 41 20 25 Fab Rail 24 LM Oak 13 - 41 26 25 Gaud Fll 25 Lhe Oak 15 47 30 33 Good Il 26 Live Oak 11 35 27 28 Far Rmun 27 1Oak 14 m 32 29 Far Raman 28 Lira Oak 12 38 33 30 Far Remus 29 LM Oak 11 35 31 29 Fab Remus 30 Ling Oak 14 m 27 33 Fair Re...d 31 U. Oak 13 41 30 27 Far Rerrgwd 32f- U. Oak 11 35 Z4 28 Far Rerol 33 Lt. Oak 10 31 1 18 25 Pow Fil l4wd 34 lOak 14 m _ 25 32 Pow Fknvd 35 U.Oak 13 41 Z7 33 Pow gi-. a 361 U.Oak 12 38 Z4 27 Far- ptanil 37 Lire Oak 14 44 29 34 Fair Remoed 38 Lke Oak 15 47 25 29 Far Ramned 39 U. Oak 16 50 31 32 Fab lamaed d0 Lire•Oak 16 50 39 33 Fav Ranl - 41 I.N. Oak 15- 47 34 32 Fair Fkrl 42 LNe Oak - 15 47 1 27 34 Pow P.1—d 43 Lich Oak 12 38 27 33 Pow Rwraed 44 Lm1: Oak 8 28 18 X Fair Rerriowd 45 Liw Oak 0 26 20 23 Pow Rerrw.cd 46 "Oak 15 47 E 32 Poor Remaed 47 LAW Oak 20 B3 36 43 Far Ramped 48 Lne Oak 19 6D 37 43 Pow Rent —d 49 Lie Oak 17 53 33 39 Paw Ramped 50 Line Oak 13 41 32 Fair Pali led 51 1Oak 11 35 33 32 Fair Rirw.W 52 Live Oak 12 38 25 34 Fair Rpna.W 53 Lko Oak 10 31 27 Poor R —.d 54 Cottage Pont 12 38 20 15 Exodllnl Rtli1w1 55 Pam 10 31 20 15 Exodled Fi lcd 56 Lite Oak 12 38 Z7 31 Far Rcrr..d 57 1Oak 16 50 28 33 Far Ramawd 58 1Oak 9 28 22 24 Fair Rained 59 Lre Oak 14 44 26 30 Fair Rarroed 80 C Perm 12 38 20 15 Excellent Raouled 61 Pont 9 28 20 1s Excellent fta —red 62 Pam 11 35 t9 15 Exoole4 RaimUl d 83 Pam 12 38 I 18 15 F ..net Rtloca;ed 64 lAUnM oak 13 41 1 Z4 31 Pow R.—d 65 Pam 13 41 5 15 Excellra4 Remain 66 U. Oak 14 44 1 28 37 Fob Pvl.ed 67 C Pail 16 50 6 75 Excellent Ranain 68 Lw Oak 13 41 20 35 Far Remood 60 u; OA 13 41 28 35 Fair Pcor d 70 Lio Oak 9 28 24 23 Fair Rianoad 71 Lis Oak 8 25 22 22 Far Romood 72 'Lee Oak 8 25 21 22 Poor Ra-&,W 73 O l Enn 8 25 19 2D Fair f el—d 74 Tree Not W Site l 75 Palm 18 57 1 9 15 Good Rennin 76 Lee Oak 13 41 30 25 Far Reialn 77 Waler Oak 10 31 26 20 POdr Rwironed 78 Win. Oak - - 43 41 Fair Remain 70 Filrrrlsa 13 41 38 19 Goad Remain 80 Slash Pino 16 57 62 32 Good Remain 81 Forma;a Swea 14 44 41 25 Good Remain 82 Lip Oak 28 BB 54 62 Good Rams 83 Wall Oak 14 44 38 48 Far Rerrroed 64 SIae11 Pme 19 Go I 65 42 Good Reiraln E5 V Wa Oak 13 41 1 32 47 poor P m. ed 86 Palm 9 28 1 18 15 Ex Mi Reacaod 87 Caroline Uwe) IS a E—Alew Radials Jacaiaada - 40 28 - - Excelled Remain JacararWa 47 47 Excellent Raniam - E P (NOT 14D11VIDUALL7 '�_ t'bli - ® - -� f Y _ G EVALUATED, 11SiJT ARE; M J/, - t HOOD CLXIPITION_ AND t A5 DErE MED, DT THE CITY OF aEAR aM REIMMENTATI t CONSIDERED TtO !SE A v. O` --moo; ♦ ; b 6 - F. JK VE, TREES riOLL AE' .. t SPECIMkEN TREE STAND. , :, - r-1 - 'i I'' REPLAOED TREE FOR THEE NO Nor• Il FOR INCH. TRIM FOUND IN POOR COr101TlON ARE NOT RIMUMM TO LSE REPLlill EEE TREE PRESERVATION I! e s I TREE NO. 74 WAS SLIOhRI ON SURVk1, 8UT WA9 NDf PRES@IT DIJreItiG, 1HE flEIA Pow Fax MIT WATK}N E� t *i I -. ���' �' p �i cewrat sraE vT ON �wiARr a, soot AND 15 NOT �oot�tteD Fore ON sae t M Tills REPLACIVIENT CALCULATION. M d was a TM NO. 8T' THROI1G,Il e9 ARE FMED IN AND APPM TO BE OFF -MM ' I' P c] �_ _ w inl� d0! 0Qq® p� O® O� _ n m Gott O 4 O 1Fd II ar __ -"` 7�.., `i<' �../ -' -ti� - .� /- �- �_ ✓_- �..�..- f � .� -_. ��. :�. -�- _� . �_ "�.c. � �_ —_ G -_r -i' �_ -� �^ i � EXISTING GY1% TREECi - = . • B .� EXISTING, PALM TRFFS 1 EXISnw PPE TREES . EXISTING, TREE CANOPY OOJE t4E S 1 C {ELL S � O Z a LL O Z Z W NW I.L E 3 K O Q s Z _j Z 0 = Q W C9 ll 04 H'Z j UJ Q Q Q Z UC=7 Z DATE 3/29/0 ! i { e IL I' P c] �_ _ w inl� d0! 0Qq® p� O® O� _ n m Gott O 4 O 1Fd II ar __ -"` 7�.., `i<' �../ -' -ti� - .� /- �- �_ ✓_- �..�..- f � .� -_. ��. :�. -�- _� . �_ "�.c. � �_ —_ G -_r -i' �_ -� �^ i � EXISTING GY1% TREECi - = . • B .� EXISTING, PALM TRFFS 1 EXISnw PPE TREES . EXISTING, TREE CANOPY OOJE t4E S 1 C {ELL S � O Z a LL O Z Z W NW I.L E 3 K O Q s Z _j Z 0 = Q W C9 ll 04 H'Z j UJ Q Q Q Z UC=7 Z PROJECT N . 0 40 - 80 0472536: - - SHEET NUMB GRAPi4C SCALE 00 DATE 3/29/0 >A � 8� 6 a e a o : J � fl: C e iii 7 ID OF 1 PAP TREE TO AMR Al B1 J O.FNEFLA COWPAR MW '. - -- r OL FRC AM TC M06T6 ONE N d0OI1C tO.UNN01 Y1NN' vfmE YOMN9 Cl PWC fRCfl 1 R Not WMAI 19. AT A 1'IBNLII F B A A 1 TO � fEl10Vt:D ANY' I°ItD1ECIED 1FE73 OR ANY PAUL UNIN A TIi4P0iOT CIf.AIt OR 67RA3Nf 7R1'1C . RMR A6IFt0YOE0 N ARMU A DNIISMI R UR Ft33t'�N LbG1N YIN A MNMM CP ONE I= AN3101ED N CPVM AV TNRB FM ABOVE O RWO. NPOMW E FORIAM CAI TIE 6116 ONCE OFEGFICATI" FOR ADDRIpML NOM ED AT A FWQON COTAN E OP MOW NET AMM. NOFMNTAL RUA AT09 TO BE GaorImIGTED Uwa ND L IM TITAN T ME PBOVED M WNTRAC'TOR MOT OM M CITY PrAGONABL E OR MtftIN Y TO RELOCATE TIE WADVE Mr VAI Y pi FIRM r� oP TAE Wif61R PLOT. TIE CQY'WCIY DEVELORfBii D YIN M FOZOVI MS CF GECM 1-UMCl .� >; an A D PALM? &I" ea N o"LUNC>E YIN OECTON b-ma BNU AND M MILOU1 b . MAN THtOJ 1 M OONT'TIOCLTM WCOM PLW O 1WA MAT Be Imo' ED PN7VVM AIMED FROM RE COIYtMRT DEV£LOMM COOTDNATOR PLANT LPEGED MOVED U M M COMM OP M 'IDVED "W" A GOIF'L4%M OBE M AIL M MUM ON AN N Mat -NCH BANOL �r WOFDNMTOR MAY MYEM E TMT CWAN PF070MW 7R>3D APE NOT JEaBfD ro BE CN GF AK RTFOIIM PROTECME BARTtM ALL OU FACF TOREIOIN MAIEAW., TRAB W OR DEEW6 61NLL ME R R"VIED 01417" A MCLW Yi BUT NOT LMW TO 06CM NNE IK NATAID6. At 04M CONDITOM N: N UM 6Y TN@ AY7 AFit7t EU€GCILYi OF 11E BAItr66t IID OUCH MAtE1?LAL CR LIfTFR ONALL BB A1QA NO �iFR'Bi► Q!?YC1rL4 60[L 06'GORQ At CGFtl1101G71CN MATBIJAL6 OHALL Bt I LEAN ECLIAL SIAM FOMWIAL, 4C FED" FROfEi7IE6 AO ORM COPACTIRIU CB M FM UWOCN A PIONOVAL IOEG W NO MEN SAM11BA M OFBCM LOCATICM AND DE6ID1 OP W N ACDpRDAMM MM flOM WWM FC.TEOTRY PFACTIM AWD A6 APPIWvED 9Y M CITY NYY AIt fA1� WiliY. /J1 my srwMYa dY if!_Yhl w�, ud �w�u ecti �w�iw eww W ME PLACED A W O ALL �PRDIEGtED TF7®D PRIOR TO LAID A�ARATION Ot CONSTAICTIGN ACTWRE6 THAN M F1UL. OP ALL OPECC66 OP I1AW'gCPDVF2 ACID OApAL PALM TAM M VIAL DRIFL11E OP ALL PROTECTIVE NATIVE FM T70E6 AND CYbM COUM TM OFECM T1W1 TIID-W6D6 CF M OWiLFE CF ALL OnM FADIECTIVE OPEGEO; UI N M NICE DRPLSM OF 71M YfM A OI°ECM TEE 6TAND- 0 AFE TO BE CO)87FAICTFD MIS NB LEOO TI W WO-NCM BY Ub-W W UFO OF WOW FO CPRI(/IT POM 3 ' SHADE UR Ft33t'�N LbG1N YIN A MNMM CP ONE I= AN3101ED N CPVM AV TNRB FM ABOVE O RWO. NPOMW C ED AT A FWQON COTAN E OP MOW NET AMM. NOFMNTAL RUA AT09 TO BE GaorImIGTED Uwa ND L IM TITAN .3 b WADVE Mr VAI Y pi FIRM r� oP TAE Wif61R PLOT. TIE CQY'WCIY DEVELORfBii G . TIVE ! B , R ODU F UW N PEKE WAIL ALL COO MICTpN ACTIVITY 161MOMED. M AMA 16 ON41 RIMAN WON6TW =P BY AIIT ACTIVITY DINNG CC WiR "CK NATIVE ORMW COMB APO C6m811 "Mr RM DIE SAIMM OMLL E to 11 6 $ MAN THtOJ 1 M OONT'TIOCLTM WCOM PLW O 1WA MAT Be Imo' ED PN7VVM AIMED FROM RE COIYtMRT DEV£LOMM COOTDNATOR PLANT LPEGED MOVED U M M COMM OP M Q A 3 ROWYED CN.Y BT PLO" LABCIt UMMM C ID TOMB Olt Dr ODE14 APPROVED I ETC06: 3 CN GF AK RTFOIIM PROTECME BARTtM ALL OU FACF TOREIOIN MAIEAW., TRAB W OR DEEW6 61NLL ME R R"VIED 11' N: N UM 6Y TN@ AY7 AFit7t EU€GCILYi OF 11E BAItr66t IID OUCH MAtE1?LAL CR LIfTFR ONALL BB A1QA NO �iFR'Bi► Q!?YC1rL4 60[L 06'GORQ At CGFtl1101G71CN MATBIJAL6 OHALL Bt 33' 07EC MOM KWE6 OR 07ER ATTAp11 WO CP ANY KND ONALL BE AITAC EW TO ANT PR7CECTED TRBB OR MALK Our RECT TIEEB ARE MCMADED, W09EVM FROM 7M FROWSI IO L 6 M STALL BE TAKEN TO PNUW= 71E CWWAL RAC? AIM GF TE 11636 FROIF.CIBD BT TM lECTION AO FEW IT MIALL ATLY TO OIICN i1 OP& " IG7IVITE6 ARECT FF40TEM TMO W 7TIAT M OWW. AL ROOT ZMW B VOTWWW, OR AM FRNN4 MW f S 6 D CID^ ADWEFET�M TO M FaICU t1 A ISCIBQLMAL 76CJlSCM N REdiIED. %L ROOT TORE ULL BE V*W4 M. ARWW 0110M M&T M OEVE= BY CLEAN FAM 6 dM AT TWO I'M a u w ON N'PACT6 TWO MOM MM GIN M MINED BT UILUM4IP04 M RQUIRWR MWA M FOR 7NID MMM 1w NO A MEN AD M RKM RCY116 YIN A PRIOIG W 6UN &W at OhM MUPR!!iW 0550M MR TIM 3 AS' OCATED URNN M CWTIGIL ROOT ZOE 71AAT ALL BE MACMED BY CIMIMIC IGN MDT BB PWNFD TO A DEPIIN OF £ DODiNO 6iRADE CR TO M N'7�T11 CP CORN IBANCF P LM TAM b OA1ED MM M OWN& GIRADE' MM SC ' ITY tM Ai£ TO BE WALLED U M M CRTIICAI. RDM TOWS M ROOT FI%KM MOWFE SWM MAY 6E UTAMW s{ n WALIAA VIA 1WBND OR PV ECifONA4 DORM AO GIPFCOE77 TO OF$1 T1E<1GiNJa WNCIED LAIMAL BRANCd S OP FROIEC W IMM M PMVM MNNM TEC"LIFA AS PM /P n PMQTMLD WWEYL INN WO /PMM CM TWAT F WWV9 M MR4404 COLLAR) AND OLOT CM (OM T1MT LEAVE A 676 CM M 71E£) w- §n § CE TT1N"M � tW AREQNYB'B0M M 3 ALLTTW 6�ID" CCOM i�� YLL TO 71M IEP �iT� � TREES TOSEREMOVED SHADE TREES 5� (MI-ES) ND TiOTAL M.MS 8 3 N' 8 a 36' 10, 3 36' 11' 3 33' IT 6 72' IT 9 117 - Ir 6 et is 7 1w 16 3 AS' 17 J SC 16 1 Or 1P 1 /P n 1 z 1 w- TOTAL DAK 677' DTH 1 1 a a a Z a w i z w O a is cr Z W Q z a�g 1 � _ 4 U C9 z z DANE �. -3/29/07 PROJECT NO. U IO eD 047253651 �• SKIT NUMBER GPAPHC SCALE L101' a w i w a w ui X iMT6 7F13A To Be NBADVED �1 EM IM TFM TO 1E RELOCATED 1 RIKKIM 1 OAK %1M irC EMD76D PALM TFM O LU z .. EM676G POE 1F>EE6 g O � is cr Z W Q z a�g 1 � _ 4 U C9 z z DANE �. -3/29/07 PROJECT NO. U IO eD 047253651 �• SKIT NUMBER GPAPHC SCALE L101' I I 1 i k i i i i `r i 3 r PLANT SCHEDULE m can marA0TAL G= GAL an ox I U t.aprd,veda wx- rm—A& G t.d Crape "ti. FA. rcAo w-_tr twm al.., 17 OiJt L,I"N b Film T .ww fk ltl -7M14W I'k k w O.P MYKI. FA. 21COI W -17 rmtl III— 2s .. La u0m. " .tv —.ft. &.4 191— fA. 41Cd 14' -Y' w is Va v f i ov a— vrrN— swu... Ua aw: FA. 4'ca w1w wr u 'A E V g�' O UA UI,— P.rifdi. %t.-' AIM- L—bk k ft. F.G. s'cd t2' -w wr 17 $555 PA,r, TI[!a C= p��y, fpt4lON Q= GAL an ox acafi L! - N /711 STERN f' V s" pMnatb P"..M1 fA. - 10 CT. MW. R 3 Ls EUFFO2 ya �` V � OwtV cabala 1%.d— Fn Fkkn fA.0 C7. MW 94 U » cam C= 'JILL ox BltlABSt! `< Q HM .46w —'F " I1 .w 1Fat Mfr+' 71.~ MIA— 3 GAL Is•kli" 133 F PLAMn CTTP.) • 0 IN I— 4aFr 7NIn G—W F d U— I IN 10 "Di• 101 3 FOUIGATICN PLANTING& O 11 RdFl.lyg. kdW. k.1- "laden. sow 'w. 227 e n (Trr.) Va Vl,n.n aba.,alo•, H.IWV Vlbana•n 7 II 96%W 217 O g�I uF • - V1 vii.— aiw t:wm.m 'J•,.. Va— 3 pN 2vow Im a 8 a• Q= 02rA r�:s CAcr2wK G@iZ ORE Oct SU36M GR0.ND CdEW L. I w Ok.db t---m VarUWW Fb LI( 1 wl/ 24• x W.W us 75 o l.G --- g o L4nt�. I Mr 24" t 12`es• 299 f t J MC I%Awb v. -MINK% PFk MNIH 3 W Or . W wT MF, Dl TA T-d kq— ddk— /Walk JL. I iN 24" c W.W 101 n E O� ALL IR7PDEED PLANT 1'I.ItEfbAL 3i±aLl P!E ROF3DA GRADE � 6 s ?' 'I OR BETTBt 4 x. / I.�NneCari RlOUIOMM *Let Tiat 197Y GR � C11N1ML1M w euT MATERIAL (A4'TI - a DIV 12� PAVED VEHICULAR USE AREA r ti _ q_1702 REQUIRED: 101 OF GROSS VEHICULAR USE AREA (145,526 REQUIRED, EACH TREE SPECIES SHALL PROVIDE A MINIMUM OE S.F.) SHALL BE PROVIDED IN AN ISLAND. t` S >, r TEN (10) PERCENT OF THE TOTAL NUMBER OF PROPOSED, (16,7W S.F.) OF INTERIOR ISLANDS EXCEEDS TREES. REQUIREMENT OF (16,552 S.F.) PROPOSED: THE MINIMUM OF ANY ONE SPECIES OF TREE IS REQUIRED, TREES /PLANTS WITHIN INTERIOR ISLANDS (17) LIVE OAK WHICH 15 APPROXIMATELY (10) - ONE (1) TRMASO SQUARE FEET OF REQUIRED F9aNir L►C4iIQ7 PERCENT OF THE TOTAL (165) TREES PROVIDED. GREENSPACE. ONE TREE PER ISLAND MINIMUM. C yE AP Gloa'�r'IICn,NR SL..AOrt�FV la) WITH (145) PROPOSED TREES THERE ARE (7) - SHRUBS. TO COVER MINIMUM 501 REQUIRED a a i F .I'aI7EDRM4m 8mlzT + To SPECIES PROVIDED. (3 PALMS-1 TREE, 2 ACCENT GREFNSPACE. o �IQPeeMS� R6 N TREE5.1 TREE) PROPOSED, INTERIOR ISLAND (16,7E0 ST) z � m' i B - PROPOSED TREES/PLANTS WITHIN INTERIOR 5 ,5 kk REQUIRED, TEN (10) PERCENT OF THE TOTAL NUMBER OF ISLANDS -60 TREES, 74 PALMS, AND A" SHRUBS. a _ cv TREES SHALL BE OF A SPECIES WHICH EXHIBITS - TREES WHICH ARE BALLED AND BURLAPPED MUST NAVE THE tA, CONSPICUOUS FLOWERS. BURLAP REMOVED OR FOLDED DOWN AT THE TIME OF PLANTING. ALL TWINE OR ROPE MUST BE REMOVED. IF WIRE r *�y PROPOSED. (40) CRAPE MYRTLE TO BE INSTALLED WHICH 15 A BASKETS ARE USED, THE UPPER ROWS MUST BE CUT BEFORE lu "l TOTAL OF (10) PERCENT OF ALL PROPOSED TREES, PLANTING. IF STAKES OR GUY WIRES ARE USED TO SUPPORT A (2 ACCENT TREES.I TREE) TREE, THE WIRE MUST BE COVERED WITH PROTECTIVE SSS L MATERIAL WHERE IT 15 IN CONTACT WITH THE TREE AND THE r Q ii REQUIRED, (2 ACCENT TREES) . I SHADE TREE; NO MORE THAN STAKES OR GUY WIRES MUST BE REMOVED AFTER ONE YEAR. Z LANDSCAPING SHALL BE INSTALLED IN A MANNER WHICH St ra1m0ATIaN 251 OF REQUIRED TREES MAY DE ACCENT. MINIMIZES CONFLICTS BETWEEN THE LANDSCAPING AND SIGNAGE J" AND UTILITIES. c _ fTTP.) PROPOSED: (410) ACCENT TREES (LM) PROPOSED WHICH - NO PARKING, DISPLAY OF VEHICLES OR OUTDOOR STORAGE d gN NN r.. TOTALS (12) PERCENT OF TOTAL TREES REQUIRED. OR DISPLAY OF MERCHANDISE IS PERMITTED IN OR OVER ll.l irkLFW11� REQUIRED LANDSCAPED AREA. IRRIGATION et: - SOIL IN WWIGH REQUIRED LANDSCAPING 15 TO BE INSTALLED a ' g s1GNAGE 00 REWIRED - AUTOMATIC PERMANENT IRRIGATION SYSTEM MUST BE GENERALLY INDIGENOUS TO THE LOCALE. SOIL MUST Q e s" PROVIDING COMPLETE WATER COVERAGE FOR ALL REQUIRED AND OTHER LANDSCAPING MATERIALS BE LOOSE, FRIABLE AND FREE OF LIMESTONE AND OTHER SHALL BE PROVIDED AND MAINTAINED AS A FULLY CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, ROADBASE MATERIAL, ROCKS, U a WEEDS, GRASSES, HARDPAN CLAY OR OTHER DEBRIS. SOIL 1'A LANDSCAPING IN AEWEALTHHY GROWING CONDITION. SHALL BE ADJUSTEP WHERE NECESSARY TO BE COMPATIBLE Q 2d V�b�rtY WITH THE PLANT SPECIES BEING INSTALLED, BACKFILL SOIL 1 TRIANGLE ��-) POTABLE TWATER SYSTEMS UPPLY SYSTEM DSMALL INCLUDEIA MATERIAL SHALL BE THOROUGHLY WATERED IN AND AROUND Z 1 BACKFLOW PREVENTER AT THE SERVICE ROOT BALLS TO PREVENT ANY AIR POCKETS. THE USE OF Q AMENDED AND ENRICHED SOILS MAY BE REQUIRED WHERE J P „'M CONNECTION. NECESSARY TO INCREASE THE WATER RETENTION CAPABILITIES INSTALLED 50 AS i a - IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL TO MINIMIZE SPRAY UPON ANY IMPERVIOUS OF SOILS IN ORDER 70 REDUCE THE AMOUNT OF WATERING az SURFACE, SUCH AS SIDEWALKS AND PAVED AREAS, NEEDED TO MEET THE LANDSCAPING WATERING REQUIREMENTS. v FAT - IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL INCLUDE A RAIN - REQUIRED SHADE TREES PLANTED SHALL NOT BE TOPPED, i - eVFR 5EN50R/5HUT OFF DEVICE TO AVOID IRRIGATION SHAPED OR SEVERELY PRUNED, BUT MUST BE ALLOWED TO a uA _ DURING PERIODS OF SUFFICIENT RAINFALL. GROW TO MATURITY AND ATTAIN THEIR NATURAL FORM SO UNDERGROUND IRRIGATION SHALL BE INSTALLED THAT CROWN DEVELOPMENT IS NOT INHIBITED. p i t WITHIN THE DRIPLINES OF EXISTING TREES UNLESS - ALL LANDSCAPING NEAR PUBLIC SIDEWALKS MUST BE o ROOT PROTECTION MEASURES ARE PROVIDED. MAINTAINED TO ALLOW UNOBSTRUCTED PASSAGE OF p B - IF AVAILABLE, RECLAIMED WATER SMALL BE PEDESTRIANS. 4J DEAD DECLINING MISSING AND DISEASED PLANT MATERIAL USED FOR IRRIGATION PURPOSES. O~ ��((J SHALL HE REPLACED WITH HEALTHY MATERIAL OF SIMILAR y N PERIMETER BUFFERS (ARTICLE A. DIV. 12, SEC. 3 -1202 D) TYPE IN KEEPING WITH THE LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS AT Z C) Z - GREEk11 FA DRIVE SUFFER (35A LF) THE TIME OF ORIGINAL PLANTING AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH 9 W S REQUIRED. 101 MIN. WIDE BUFFER. ONE (1) TREE PER 35 THE APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLAN. _ �nQ La L.F. WITH 1001 SHRUBS, SIGHT t'1SIBILITY TRIANGLE (ARTICLES DIV. SEC, 9-qO4 A) �U CD EXISTING PROPOSED, FIVE (5) 5A5AL P LIVE OAKS, TWO (2) - TO MINIMIZE TRAFFIC HAZARDS AT STREET OR DRIVEWAY = � .� .. :. TREES AND iq LL PSHRULBM.4ss TO REMAIN, 0 ACCENT INTERSECTIONS, NO STRUCTURE OR LANDSCAPING MAY BE p INSTALLED WHICH WILL OBSTRUCT VIEWS AT A LEVEL BETWEEN �� - _ - - NORTHERN BUFFER (225 LE) (30) INC44ES ABOVE GRADE AND EIGHT (S) FEET ABOVE GRADE Z > REQUIRED, 5' MIN. WIDE BUFFER. ONE (1) TREE PER 35 L.F. WIT14IN THE SIGHT DISTANCE TRIANGLE. 111 WITH 1001 SHRUBS, Q Q ' vlalealn PROPOSED, 6 SWEET GUM, AND 57 SHRUBS. O 4 TRAWAX (7YP.) - EASTERN BUFFER (433 LF) D 8 €E TREE INVENTORY PLAN (L100) FOR EXISTING TREE Z DATA, 1 K)LWSToT�I1, 0REENLEA DRIVE �, N!loN�TT rIASN REQUIRED, 121 MIN. WIDE BUFFER. ONE (1) TREE PER 35 Q fA To Re71AM TIRIANGLE fT*►J EUFfLR� T�ItIvan fM.)� L.F. WITH 1001 SHRUBS TO REACH 6' WITHIN D2TASIELS TREE PRESERVATION PLAN (L701) FOR MITIGATION W THREE (3) TEARS. 3.) THIS PROJECT 15 NOT LOCATED IN A SPECIAL AREA, OR U (� - - - PROPOSED, ONE (1) EXISTING SLASH PINE, TWO (2) SGENIG CORRIDER THAT CURRENTLY HAS AN ADOPTED PLAN = EXISTING SWEET GUM TO REMAIN, THREE (3) BY THE CITY OF CLEARWATER. [2) IL.GaL PAL77s RELOCATED SABAL PALMS, 12 LIVE OAKS, 161 ! o Routh SHRUBS. Z " 40 HOURS BEFORE 1011 Oq DATE CALL SUNSHINE 3/29/07 1 -800- 432 -4770 PROJECT NO. /M TW LAM W FLORIDA L 047253651 R 'SID= bB ml (1070) 1 mtffiES o WX OF S MID WS - IS AO DO SHEET NUMBER WL OF 2 M 1w� Bl� IMU MWAW- L102 IE SCALE AS SNOFUi 1i E fi a PALM PLANTING DETAIL KTA gm!!�m HpRiD/ NG. f ft f -T PACING � .f f f AT BED EDGE NOTES, L I�TpR�O��pNP3p{ T�O��'F� TO THE OP OF G UP R007BALL. 2. PRUNE ALL 64R99S TO ACHIEVE A UNIFORM MA66lr4E1GHT 3.3'IMWftIM MJLC44 OR � PSPECIFIED NUGGET 4. EXCAVATE ENTIRE BED SPECFIED FOR GROUDCOVHR BED. b. F-!I U, ED GM4DE (OGEE GRADING 6. PREPARED PLANTING SOIL AS COPPIECI1FIEDA.. INOT& U4 EN GROUND- IN SOIL MIX A2 IR'ED 1 ¢CAJOFYT 1DALL SIDES A�e'L EDD SUBSOIL SiLRUF!/yi00U1IDCOVE1t PLANTING DETAIL, SECT1oN KTA L CROWN MEDIANS 4 4.1 SLOP-ES (OR AS 6PECFED ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN01 2- EXCAVATE A CONTINUOUS 24' DEEP PIT (PROM TOP OF CURB) FOR ENTSE LENGTH AND UADTH OF ISLAND 4 BACIGILL WIT34 APP- ROVED PLANTING SCNL MDC SEE 202A CF SECTION 02500 OF PLANTING SPECfl•ICATIONS 3. PROVIDE CONTINUOUS TOEEP ROOT'/ ROOT BARRIER. (UA4EK SPECINEDA 4. PROTECT AND RETAIN ALL CURBS A)M BAW- b. PROVIDE IY DEAD ZONE • CURB EDGES. 6. PROVIDE 2' FROM TOP OF CURB TO FINISH GRADE TO ALLOW FOR T. MULCH OR SOD. PROVIDE 4' MNMUM TOPSOIL ABOVE COMPACTED SUBGRADE FOR 60D (TYP1 COMPACTED SUBGRADE TO REMAIN FOR STRJCIURAL SUPPORT OF CURB SYSTEM (TYP1 t- CHERAL N12= A VERIFY LCCATIO I OF ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TTO Y EXCAVATION ACTIVITY, B. EXCAVATE ENTIRIS AREA UNDER ALL SHRUBS 6. G ALL MEE) IRIS SHALL UTILIZE POOR DRAINAGE DETAIL WHEN PERCOLATION RATES ARE 2' PER HOUR OR LESS OR DO NOT MET LOCAL REQUIREMENTS. TYPIGL LANDSCAPE flEmIAN/ISLAW en Tow KTA L PROTECT TREE! TVLW WITH 0'2-PLY BLACK RUBBER HOGS 2. DOUBLE 6TRAND GAUGE WINE MOTE FOR MULTI -TRUCK TREED, GUY TO am STRONGEST TIR UNC AT CENTEW COVOWD WITH O' 2 -PLY BLACK RiJBCiER HOSE. 3. TWO 6' COM'ERCIAL GRADE 'T' - P06T SPACED EVENLY AROUND TREE- 4,3' MNIMUT OF F4W BARK NUGGET MULCH OR AS SPECFED. S. SOIL BERM TO HOLD WATER 6. FINISHED GRAPE (SEE GRADING PLAN) 1. TOP OF R POTa%ALL MIN. V ABOVE FINISHED GRADE O. B ( B OR CONTARIERIIED (SEE SPEGFICATIO4S FOR ROOT BALL RECLpREMINTS). 9. PREPARED PLANTING SOIL AS SPECIFIED. D. ROOTOALL6 GREATER THAN 24' DIAMETER SWILL BE PLACED ON MOUND OF L040ISTURDED SOL TO PREVENT SETTLING FOOTBALLS SMALLER THAN 24' N CIA MAY SIT ON COMPACTED EARTH. NOTES, A. CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSURE PERCOLATION OF ALL PLANTING PITS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, Q FINAL TRREE STAKING DETAILS AND PLACEMENT TO BE APPROVED BY OUNER Q 'TREE SAVER' ANC41ORING SYSTEM MAY BE SUBSTITUTED FOR T' -POST STAKING SYSTEM UPON APPROVAL BY OWNER OR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SMALL TREE PLARMS DETAIL M aR umo • SECTION KTA U BABE OF TREE 6HALL BE PLANTED SLIGHTLY ABOVE ADJACENT FN04 GRADE REMOVE ALL TWINE I STRAPS I CUT BURLAP FROM TOP V3 OF ROOTBAL.L. NO SYNTHETIC BURLAP WILL BE ACCEPTED. 2. Y r W BMOC NUGGET MULCH 3. DIAMMTER OF TREE PIT TO BE TWICE THE DtAYETER OF ROOTBALL- ROUGYEN 61PEO OF TREE PIT. 4.3' HIGH SOIL SAUCL'RNUATER RNG AROUND TREE. S. TOP60L MIX BACP71LL NOTE, I.I. SITE CONDITIONS REQUIRE GUYING OF THE TREE, GUYING DETAILS FROM SMALL TREE PLANTING SHALL 'ME USED. MULTI -TRUW TREE PLANTM DETAIL SECTION KTA 9 a= o a � I S2 � 09 6 i Yo 0 J w C w a U Z \i al a L FINISH GRADE 2. BAC #ILL WITH PREPARED PLANTING SOIL MIX AS SPECIFIED. L MNMIM OF NDW (L bQ= GOOD PALM FRONDS A WL16111NGTONIA 2. PRUNE AND TTE FRON06 WITH TEMP T11RNE. PALFIS SMILAR W/O00T0 INTACT, LY 0 tlC�A1E 9 SEE PLANS AND I YO WL CUT' 3. a LAYERS OP BURLAP SPECS. FCR PALMS WV BOOTS TO REMAIN ON Q PROTECT ZOTECT TTSUNC TRUNK 2 -C FIVE 2' X 4' X W WOOD G. F S 3 Q4TTENlL a. 6ECUr4E BATTENS WITH .- �7Oy�AB�EEp Z 6. IB'.AUGERED HOLE - PROVED BTAL� 4 To4HO�LO�ea,T`rR PLAL6E. D. CONTRACTOR SHALL n NO NAILS SHAJ-L BE DRIVEN ASSURE F'ER".OLATION OF ALL FLAMING R PITS PRIO TO S INt0 PALM. HEIGHT OF BATTENS SMALL RE RJ6TALLATIONI C7 C 1+�LATION LOCATED N TO THE NEIGHT OF THE PALM 6 FOR ADEQUATE BRACING. OVERALL PALM HEIGHT (I EASURED (.L 6. 9 -2' X 4'X O' TO TOP OF BUD) LLI Q NAIL (DRILL AND NAIL F (MEASURED u u� t0 T NECESSARY) TO BATTENS AND 2' X 4' STAKES. FLAG BOTTOM OF N AT MDPONT AND AT SAW- LEAF SHEATHS) B l PROVIDE FLA061N6 GRAY EA6 l�D TO 9 I 0.3' SPECIFIED ULC4 a BERM SOIL TO HOLD WATER TOP OF HAROVI -= 10. FINISH GRADE TRMYV IL Y X Y X 24' (MINI rT. WOOD STAKES fTTTJ NAIL TO SUPPORT POLES - A 12. PREPARED PLANTING SOIL AS SPEGIfYED PALM PLANTING DETAIL KTA gm!!�m HpRiD/ NG. f ft f -T PACING � .f f f AT BED EDGE NOTES, L I�TpR�O��pNP3p{ T�O��'F� TO THE OP OF G UP R007BALL. 2. PRUNE ALL 64R99S TO ACHIEVE A UNIFORM MA66lr4E1GHT 3.3'IMWftIM MJLC44 OR � PSPECIFIED NUGGET 4. EXCAVATE ENTIRE BED SPECFIED FOR GROUDCOVHR BED. b. F-!I U, ED GM4DE (OGEE GRADING 6. PREPARED PLANTING SOIL AS COPPIECI1FIEDA.. INOT& U4 EN GROUND- IN SOIL MIX A2 IR'ED 1 ¢CAJOFYT 1DALL SIDES A�e'L EDD SUBSOIL SiLRUF!/yi00U1IDCOVE1t PLANTING DETAIL, SECT1oN KTA L CROWN MEDIANS 4 4.1 SLOP-ES (OR AS 6PECFED ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN01 2- EXCAVATE A CONTINUOUS 24' DEEP PIT (PROM TOP OF CURB) FOR ENTSE LENGTH AND UADTH OF ISLAND 4 BACIGILL WIT34 APP- ROVED PLANTING SCNL MDC SEE 202A CF SECTION 02500 OF PLANTING SPECfl•ICATIONS 3. PROVIDE CONTINUOUS TOEEP ROOT'/ ROOT BARRIER. (UA4EK SPECINEDA 4. PROTECT AND RETAIN ALL CURBS A)M BAW- b. PROVIDE IY DEAD ZONE • CURB EDGES. 6. PROVIDE 2' FROM TOP OF CURB TO FINISH GRADE TO ALLOW FOR T. MULCH OR SOD. PROVIDE 4' MNMUM TOPSOIL ABOVE COMPACTED SUBGRADE FOR 60D (TYP1 COMPACTED SUBGRADE TO REMAIN FOR STRJCIURAL SUPPORT OF CURB SYSTEM (TYP1 t- CHERAL N12= A VERIFY LCCATIO I OF ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TTO Y EXCAVATION ACTIVITY, B. EXCAVATE ENTIRIS AREA UNDER ALL SHRUBS 6. G ALL MEE) IRIS SHALL UTILIZE POOR DRAINAGE DETAIL WHEN PERCOLATION RATES ARE 2' PER HOUR OR LESS OR DO NOT MET LOCAL REQUIREMENTS. TYPIGL LANDSCAPE flEmIAN/ISLAW en Tow KTA L PROTECT TREE! TVLW WITH 0'2-PLY BLACK RUBBER HOGS 2. DOUBLE 6TRAND GAUGE WINE MOTE FOR MULTI -TRUCK TREED, GUY TO am STRONGEST TIR UNC AT CENTEW COVOWD WITH O' 2 -PLY BLACK RiJBCiER HOSE. 3. TWO 6' COM'ERCIAL GRADE 'T' - P06T SPACED EVENLY AROUND TREE- 4,3' MNIMUT OF F4W BARK NUGGET MULCH OR AS SPECFED. S. SOIL BERM TO HOLD WATER 6. FINISHED GRAPE (SEE GRADING PLAN) 1. TOP OF R POTa%ALL MIN. V ABOVE FINISHED GRADE O. B ( B OR CONTARIERIIED (SEE SPEGFICATIO4S FOR ROOT BALL RECLpREMINTS). 9. PREPARED PLANTING SOIL AS SPECIFIED. D. ROOTOALL6 GREATER THAN 24' DIAMETER SWILL BE PLACED ON MOUND OF L040ISTURDED SOL TO PREVENT SETTLING FOOTBALLS SMALLER THAN 24' N CIA MAY SIT ON COMPACTED EARTH. NOTES, A. CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSURE PERCOLATION OF ALL PLANTING PITS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, Q FINAL TRREE STAKING DETAILS AND PLACEMENT TO BE APPROVED BY OUNER Q 'TREE SAVER' ANC41ORING SYSTEM MAY BE SUBSTITUTED FOR T' -POST STAKING SYSTEM UPON APPROVAL BY OWNER OR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SMALL TREE PLARMS DETAIL M aR umo • SECTION KTA U BABE OF TREE 6HALL BE PLANTED SLIGHTLY ABOVE ADJACENT FN04 GRADE REMOVE ALL TWINE I STRAPS I CUT BURLAP FROM TOP V3 OF ROOTBAL.L. NO SYNTHETIC BURLAP WILL BE ACCEPTED. 2. Y r W BMOC NUGGET MULCH 3. DIAMMTER OF TREE PIT TO BE TWICE THE DtAYETER OF ROOTBALL- ROUGYEN 61PEO OF TREE PIT. 4.3' HIGH SOIL SAUCL'RNUATER RNG AROUND TREE. S. TOP60L MIX BACP71LL NOTE, I.I. SITE CONDITIONS REQUIRE GUYING OF THE TREE, GUYING DETAILS FROM SMALL TREE PLANTING SHALL 'ME USED. MULTI -TRUW TREE PLANTM DETAIL SECTION KTA 9 a= o a � I S2 � 09 6 i Yo 0 J w C w a U Z \i al a L FINISH GRADE 2. BAC #ILL WITH PREPARED PLANTING SOIL MIX AS SPECIFIED. TER! _ 4. 12�. CLEAN SAND. COMPACTED. LY 0 ADJUST LAYER THICIWESS 80 0 TOP OF ROOTBALL 16 AT EAST Q 1' ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. 0 (JJ 6. ELOPE BOTTOM TO MAIN Z J Z 6. IB'.AUGERED HOLE - W PENETRATE THROUGH = n Or C NG LAYER TO UI �fpp WATER TABLE OR TO A DEPTH OF T TO AS&AM = C7 C PROPER 1°EROOLAiIOL ca 0 T- BACKFlL L WITH V)' - 3/4- (.L 6. WATER TABLE Q LLI Q FOR A PARKING ISLAND PLANTrNG SITUATION, N CONTRACTOR TO OAC"LL Q z ENTIRE LENGTH OF PLANTING AREA TO WITHIN 6' OF SACK or CURL OR EDGE OF PAVEMENT. FWR DRAINAW C0NWWN DETAIL SECTION KTA. 4EET NUMBER L 1 Q3 I�1 - f � _ tF+�- T*• ii•� •Y ` c : z. fn l a+E•* r<� ,r • 1 rim, �. � ` � + � •: �1 ` - P• I �'t • Y It c i 1f 1 5 1 a.O - • A ypi,'� %, yli� 0 0 a •� 4 COMMW caym 1. O q � micas O it wrap 1 T `y 1 is 111 * �ti w�Yaier•w aaa—u+nrrasri isr�r, 0 _ a i -- - v - - Wal-Mart Clearwater WAL *MART Landscape Plan City of Clearwater, Florida SCALE: 1N FEET 0 10 - 75 50 DATE: MARCH, 2007 0 UX"N RlSOUlta GROUP 7007 ❑mm m � Antes, Inc. URBAN RESOURCE GROUP A MOM 00 IMUT40" "D AUDCWM W. x z Y d a I s° p, 5 d � E c E rn .3 0 2 m k a 0 N ?La m ` Ua amm - a mg a. rNi� 13 < U- E 21, i v ro zan3 o Y S 2 �yvy�� ❑ On.n o a : Z n v � O a °o c rc U 4 ° a � �. a It zr ro m N ° m �a ZZ J a LL O Z W Z W WWN . Ids F— o Q 0' i O J . AS DET ERMINED BY THE OF CLEARWATER REPRESENTATIVE, TREES WILL BE TREE OONDRION EVALIVATION i REPLACED TREE FOR TREE AND NOT INCH FOR INCH. TREES FOUND IN POOR 1 TREE di' S dates DBR CimitAllera@e HVcft - SPw& Tree Carittm RWuV Stafib I# . Dale 2D 63 95 45 - Pak Remaed '24 !!etR , 17 63 '35 "89 Fair RMI"H _I \ EXISTING TREE CANOPY COVERAGE ills Oak. 15 47 :23 :36 - Fair Rammed 4 UFO* 13: 41 28 34 Pwr Rartw PROJECT N0. U e Oak. is 1 41 23 00 Pwr Remaed Cam :P m :14 44 14 15 IeM n. '7' CW0 "P 91n 15 47 I I i6 FJitafgM Mrda1h C 'Aaito 15' 14 115- ent - daletl Ca811 'Paim 12 38 7 15- E�xtetF6T- Radcated vllL!? U 'Palm 12 38 :2 _ t5 cellat Ranoed o ( 11 95 Bf 2 9 Fair Remtred 12 Slosh Pine - 14 44 6o .25 OWEI Rammed 13 SI. Me l5ai 23 d R@rnaat. 14 Pine 15 47 61 :24 1 Gwd Rerna rl 15 IStelb Pfde 19 50 53 Gddd. R OWn: 16 ISIash Pine I1 36 62 10 Owd Remain 17. S Ins 14 66 24 d main" 1& Slash PRid 14. 44 '6B 25 - .L�btl RErifalA - i LheOak 17 53 .90 37 Fair Race - 2D* Uo OW 16; 57 :37. 44 Fair RaAC>Q.d 21* LNe 0*_ -. 46 47 7§5 :42 Poor - Remmed 22* L6eO:3k 15' 47 35 36 Folr Remti>ed 23' t:HeOak 13 41 :25 Fer Remtned - 24 Lhe'Oak 13. 41 26 1 25 Good - ReM . . 25 ' lie OW, 15: 47 '20 as :Gdbtt Refgaih - LAe0* 11 27 28 .. Fair - Refflary 27 LAe DYt 14- 44 32 29 Fair ReMah4 25 0We ak 12; 38 33 30 vair tem h 20' LKePak 11 35 �3J 0. Fair Ra An 30 Lhe Oak 14 44 '27 3s Fair - Rearmed 31 # L.tleOak 19 41 30 27 Fair Remaed 32 11;e Oalc" - 1 95 27 28 Fair REthb ed * Lkeoak 10 31 1 10 25 Poor Rem 34* LAODak 14 44 1 28 32 PWr Remtred 36* Lie Oak - 13. 41 :27 'S1 Pwr Remaed 36 Lhe Oak 12 88 24 27 Fair TemMil 37* LNe Clak 14. 44' 29 84 Fair Railbed * LAe Oak 16' 47 .26 29" Fair Ran 39* LNe Oak 16. .50 '31 "32 Fair RBfibWd All 1 50 .v .333 Fair Ranh ed •4f Lh.CDak 15' 47 34 32 Fair Reml7.ed 42* Lhe Oak 15 47 27 '34 Poor Rantxetl 'A9' tTe oaK' .12: 3B 21 1 ..83 1 Poor R06W .444 LNe CW< 9 28 1 �.74 FUt Rateed ,45 Q .9 28 211 4 ReM :46* LAE 15 47 ,25 32 _ ._ ... P0 or- zo 63 + 38 Far ,+LB* . L7iC 0#t. .. .. - .1.9 W .37 - . 46 ... . TEFr Re OWd 9* 7 .53 '33 39 Pwr Randled LJte Oak 1S 4:1 '2B :82 Fair Reitwd 51 * . IL he Cak 11 35 -33 - 32 Fait d ed 37 LM Oak 12 30 34 Fair RetnoEa 53* LM=. !D al 27 26 Pbdt d 54 Ca0baWPaIM 12 55 A 1 Excd REWCalle tl 05 09600pallm 10 31 20 , 15 .Extskett mcicoted tJwoak 12 38 :31 Fair Rem%ed 67 thO Dail. .18- 611 28 :33 Fair Ran "Oak :9. 28 :22 :24 r ReYh 59 Lh20ak 14 44 28 r mild 60 Reim. 17 38 :20. 16 :E.xt ieTt cetocaled 1' cabb SPEW31111 20 15 Exc ea- f ldSateq .Pam tt .35 t9 t5 ,ExLalm RHo 63 O palm 12, 1 15 Excalat, 64 L111"balt 13 41 '24 :81 Pdbr Reintned 68 mb ,P m 19 1 .Ex ert Rma 68 oak 14 44 28 x - Fair Ratraeq 67' . Q :Palm s W .6 16 - .Ex ell ' Ra'malit 6g Lw Oax 13 41 Fair Rammed 69' LheOak. .18. 41 '28 :85 -Far Reidtaed LM Fair 71 5;0*! 25 22 1 22 - Fair Reintwd 72 ,LM Oak :8 25 :21 :22 Pddt RftbAd 73 D e.elm B 25 1 Fair. the . 74 T.t" Not'. 0111,306 75 O palm 57 t5 Gwd Watein 46 LMOW 19 41 :00 - . '26. Fair RemaA ff w 31 25 M20 Pwr 78 . W alter'Oak 43 . 41 For Remain 79 78 13 1 ss is Gcbd ReTd . _R S PR41 18 57 (ddod ad w- R Bt S i At 25 . Barb tr 82 Llw Oak B8 "51 162 "Gepd Remain erDak. 14. 44 as '48 - Fair Pen Rine 9 60 65 A d Rem eB T.f?ak 13 41 I32 7 Pixtr Rantned 86 palm "s 28 46 - is Di eilert lReildc.1fetli La11LCtfke 25 E IlIgt , d' AO .26. Ex a't .RemeTdt Jacaranda 47 47 Excellent. F7eman m k a 0 N ?La m ` Ua amm - a mg a. rNi� 13 < U- E 21, i v ro zan3 o Y S 2 �yvy�� ❑ On.n o a : Z n v � O a °o c rc U 4 ° a � �. a It zr ro m N ° m �a ZZ J a LL O Z W Z W WWN . Ids F— o Q 0' i O J . AS DET ERMINED BY THE OF CLEARWATER REPRESENTATIVE, TREES WILL BE Q i REPLACED TREE FOR TREE AND NOT INCH FOR INCH. TREES FOUND IN POOR Z J CONDITION ARE NOT REQUIRED TO BE REPLACED. - - - p Z TREE NO. 74 WAS SHOWN ON SURVEY, BUT WAS NOT PRESENT DURING THE FIELD FOR ON OUR J O W = W - 1 OBSERVATION SITE VISIT ON JANUARY 3, 2007 AND 15 NOT ACCOUNTED r�. C.0 W. REPLACEMENT CALCULATIONS. .0 - 1 7K lk * TREE NO. 87. THROUGH 89 ARE FENCED IN AND APPEAR TO BE OFF -SITE. I 06 Z W Lu LV Q Q w 1 Q' r i I a EXISTING OAK TREES 1 0 Z I ?jC .EXISTING PALM TREES CID W g J EXISTING PINE TREES _I \ EXISTING TREE CANOPY COVERAGE DATE { 08/02/07 I RECEIVED PROJECT N0. 0 40 Bo 047253651 - FEB - 1 7808 ��� SHEET NUMBER SCALE AS SHOWN Hawkins CtlnsirtlGyon, Inc. 1 00 (�. LIVE OAK, GREENLEA DRIVE TO REWAIV *PLANT SCPEDULE TREES CODE QTY BOTANICAL COMMON CONT CAL SIZE REMARKS Ll 23 Loger5troernia indica 'Catowba, Catawba Crape Myrtle F.G. (j9 2"C.] 10'-12' Multi Stem LM 30 LoGer5troemia indica 'Muskogee' Multi-Trunked Muskogee Grape Myrtle F.G. coo 2"Cal 10'-12' Multi Stem Qv 26 Quercus virginiona Southern Live Oak F.G. 1061 4"Col 14'-I6' HT UD 26 Ulmus parvifolia 'Drake' Drake Elm F.G. 3"cal I2 " -14' HT PALM TREES CODE QTY BOTANICAL COMMON CONT CAL SIZE REMARKS 57 6 1 A\ 5P 3q Sabot palmetto Cabbage Palm F.G. 10' CT. MIN. Qv NORTHERN VB SP2 BUFFER -I q SP2 q Sabot palmetto Cabbage Palm F.G. 151-20, CT 2 - + IAIR 34 Nashingtonia robusto Mexican Fan Palm F.G. 10 CT. MIN. V SHRUBS CODE OTY 5=0ANICAL COMMON N CON, SIZE REMARKS X VB 3 (D PM 181 Hibiscus 'Fort Myers' 'Fort Myers' Tropical Hibiscus 3 GAL'� UD, IN 175 Ixora coccineo 'Nora Grant' Red Ixoro 3 gal 1811XI( .11 r "X— IN 4 WR R 1 364 Raphiolepsis indica Indian Hawthorne 3 gal 15 x15 22, 12� p QV tee. -RI VB 211 Viburnum obovatum Walter's Viburnum 7 got 36"x30" �GV400= WE LID VS 378 Viburnum suspensurn Sandankwo Viburnum 3 gal IV'x20" 27 GROUND COVERS ---- 1_ -. -. -, — CODE QTY BOTANICAL . . . . . . COMMON '6 CONT SIZE REMARKS 71 RI 0 DV 195 Dionella to5mcnica 'Variegate` M. Flax Lily I gaW 24" oc cl"xlV 20'' VISIBILITY TANGLE (TYP.) Qjr J -kLL 'A�k, ",S BE! `J 7 ,-o P LG 36q Lantana 'Gold Mound' EG 554 Uriope muscari 'Evergreen Giant' MG 34 Muhlenbergio copillaris TA 2% TrocheI05permurn o5ioticurn Evergree Giant Border Gross Asiatic Jasmine 876 Trachelospermurn josminoides Confederate Confederate Jasmine I gal@ 24" oc 12"x15" flat @ 24" oc 9"XI2" 3 Qal@ 30" oc 18" HT Min. I got@ 24" oc 9"x12" I Qal@ 12" oc V'-12" SOD. ALL LAWN AREAS WITHIN RIGHT OF WAY $HALL BE REPLACECD WITH ST- AUGUSTINE SOD AND FULLY IRRIGATE $ALL PROPOSED PLANT MATERIAL SHALL 15E FLORIDA GRADE 01 OR 5ETTER I LLj n „ > ct ua < z ED < M • . C I 0 �E < 0 W y 0� X P,� < z C) q E 7:3 Lf) CN fy < z < Cz co W z jX 6 • 0 N C3 n „ < �o ro < • co ED 0) • . C • 0 0-0 C) F 00 < Z (/) • < W 0 (D < < r) C) X E 7:3 0 C= z < Cz V) 0 W z jX 6 • C) :3 • • 06 > I = < 0 E (o Ej 0- z Uj V) • • (D 0 0 0 CL Z 0 F— Z cr- 0- C/) < • r C) (D 0 r >- X LU . z F- low 15-HEET NUMBER fib L102 1411 0 Prim, i C3 n „ < �o ro < • co ED 0) • . C • 0 0-0 C) F 00 < Z (/) • < W 0 (D < < r) C) X E 7:3 0 C= z < Cz V) 0 W z jX 6 • C) :3 • • 06 > I = < 0 E (o Ej 0- z Uj V) • • (D 0 0 0 CL Z 0 F— Z cr- 0- C/) < • n „ < < • __J LL- W W C < Z W W (.• ry < ('0 W 06 z Uj W > < • 0 0 F— Z cr- C/) < < LJ r C) (D 0 r >- X LU . z n „ < < • __J LL- W W < Z W W (.• ry < ('0 W 06 z Uj W > < n- F- 0 0 F— Z cr- C/) < < LJ r C) (D 0 r >- X LU . z F- low 15-HEET NUMBER fib L102 % o_71 fn _zz 7—c e E; wg mTg mg 'miV, MM 9 I %-A 'WRMRN_� g g MR, se 'R;yr- al 'Tw w, V MIA k- Al NR g� ol-my-wr". �n 1, m M M i onj Moil­i,4-9 T l. 07 _,`40 -^:..g.. 4 gg IN-3."OR"03�5 a M"M g, Kw? 5 Rt4 w 10, 4 t THE TREES'­lN THIS AREA 6140LJLD NO AFFECTED T it CONSTR�UdTIOKVAND WERE NOT EVALUATED. it I �n THIS! GROUP`iOF SLASH.' PINES IS 0 QNSIDERED TO BE A SPECIHEN TREE STAND. SEE THE PRESERVATION i c PLAN (L101 FOR, ITIGATION IN TWIS AREA, sE ;t T141S GROUP OF SA5AL_ i 4mt lit %J AND LIVE OAKS NA NOT INDIVIDUALLY i ALUATED,' 50T AREJN_ GOOp.-,cbND'.ITION AND _._._r_.ONSiDEREb TO E: A SPECIMEN TREE STAND. SEE TREE PRE5E9YATJPN W- i�PLAN (L101)' FOR MITIGAT16 ' IN THIS AREA. LA- a. F T I, j, 1 0 m 19 w ORONO, 7A a. F T I, j, 1 ...... ...... lly, it ;-g �J, FiAl t .MSTING PINE TREES EXISTING TREE CANOPY COVERAGE SCALE AS SHOWN • v • 0 iii w _j Z C:> W w __j (o ^00 u. 6 06 1 w z ...... ...... lly, it ;-g �J, FiAl t .MSTING PINE TREES EXISTING TREE CANOPY COVERAGE SCALE AS SHOWN • v • 0 iii w _j Z C:> W w (o ^00 u. 6 06 1 w z w W > < ul • <� ■ Z < < L<JLJ 1 W u- 0 Z DATE 03/29/07 PROJECT NO. 047253651 ...... .».w - .».-.. ...®.... ...««. ....... ..'� ..r... ..«.... ,�.. � ....... ....... «..... ...w.,. ....» ..., ;. . »... w«... ; «...... w« ..1`,.. ....,..�.. � ..w... ....-» i..... ..«... „-.... «.....v .».... .... «. ..,...» ......., —.w ....... .+,.... ..«.. «.... w..« ..n.» «,...r ...... w,u ..»...« si..r+. v..wn .r..... ...w «»r. »«w. ...,... mwn ...,... ...w.. «.»», .,....w uv« ...,... »..... w.r.. «w .m.0 m�.w ,..r•.r .« ; d � J _3 0 N xj (TTF.) ........... TREE DRIP LINE (TYP.) TREES TO:• BE R EMOVEE), SHAOE- TREES SIZE: ONCHE5) NO-. TOTAL (I N CH F_ Sl 3' 11010m. 1 "ll"I1,11 200 IN.- - No 4 REMOVED IN A CONDITION ,1011 a TREE BY TREE BASIS ♦ DETERMINED A 354' DBH 4 163' D5H 42(o) 4' DRAKE ELM AND (2(o) 4' LIVE OAK 200 DBH TO SATISFY TREE REPLACEMENT REQUIREMENTS. 1411 -7 NINE 3 ..... ..... 3' 2, .2 2.011 0�1 I% ft )Bit r. TOTAL 736` DBR TREE .PRESERVATION 1) No PERSON MAY REMOVE OR CAUSE TO BE REMOVED ANY PROTECTED TREE OR PALM 400�Sfi WITHOUT FIRST HAVING PROCURED A PERMIT AS PROVIDED BY THE CITY OF CLEARWATER. EXCEPT FOR THE REMOVAL OF HAZARDOUS TREES WITH RESPECT TO DISEASE, INSECT ATTACK, DANGER OF FALLING, PROXIMITY TO Ote EXISTING OR PROPOSED STRUCTURE AND . . .. ...... 20 INTERFERENCE WITH UTILITY SERVICE. 2) THIS PLAN PREPARED BY CERTIFIED ARZOR16T (FL -5363A) 3) SEE TREE OBSERVATION REPORT 4) UNDERGROUND IRRIGATION SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED WITHIN THE DRIPLINES OF EXISTING .. . . . ........... . . . . TREES UNLESS ROOT- PROTECTION MEASURES ARE PROVIDED. 5� . ............... EE� N -TOTAL TREES TO BE REMOVED DBH TREES REMOVED IN POOR CONDITION THAT DO NOT REQUIRE REPLACE�IENT 2IC31 Dew REMOVED IN A CONDITION THAT REQUIRE REPLACEMENT ON A TREE BY TREE BASIS ♦ DETERMINED BY CITY OF CLEARWATER REPRESENTATIVE 354' DBH -BALANCE TO BE REPLACED 163' D5H 42(o) 4' DRAKE ELM AND (2(o) 4' LIVE OAK 200 DBH TO SATISFY TREE REPLACEMENT REQUIREMENTS. rr WIN i. HEET `s "1 Ll 01 | ' � |� [B ^ � | \ V 00 �� |Y i� x � E � � Lu �n [B ^ � | \ 'I Lur ° = ° --'--- --- w -- -- ---w -----'�--w ____�_� V 00 �� |Y i� x 'I Lur ° = ° --'--- --- w -- -- ---w -----'�--w ____�_� K� 8� 0 EXISTING OAK TREES rnal �� |Y i� x K� 8� 0 EXISTING OAK TREES rnal SHEET NUMBER Ll 00 LLJ Lu Ld DATE SHEET NUMBER Ll 00