Loading...
3006 GULF TO BAY BLVD16Y 4A,�D CITY OF CLEARWATER APPLICATION FOR SITE ' PLAN APPROVAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADlMIMTRATION MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, TA FLOO. PHONE (727) -562 -4567 PAX l ra n nn r This form must be submitted for all applications for residential uses, Signs, vested rights, development agreements, seawalls, docks, marinas and other marine APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER, AND AGENT INFORMATION: APPLICANT NAME: RA I C J AG MAILING ADDRESS I) LA I L.A'V-,6 U PHONE NUMBER .�l �" - 1437-1 FAX NUMBER PROPERTY OWNERS (List all owners) AGENT NAME Uses, nonresidential uses, MAILING ADDRESS(�� PHONE NUMBER Z 4 FAX NUMBER: (77-7) uqu ° A n � — PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: STREET ADDRESS: LEGAL DESCRIPTIC PARCEL NUMBER: - -r® PROPOSED USE AND SIZE: Lam® �� I ('� C W e5 (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) SIZE OF SITE: DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: r'1O; -t C --r1 O (,1 I0 f- QC-R1 Ak C-7Q ".1-In '0jC- fBE� -NJ �r�9(�t,ta 4th DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS? YES NO I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true nd accurate to the best of my know.ledre. Sigr)bture j)nroperty owner or representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLA Sworn to and subscribed before me this day of e 2siA •r ; A.D., 1a::Y&�6 to me and /or by l4- f °�e,�= 'y�}_�"��`� ��,�_ �_ s persona'fl`� my Ill Y, My COMMISSION N CC 664919 EXPIRES: November 14, 2001 FOR PLANNING OFFICE USE ONLY: LAND USE DISTRICT OF PARCEL: ZONING: FUTURE DESIGNATION: f! to ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF ADJACENT PARCELS: NORTH: §g,{!��}{ FUTURE LAND USE CLASSIFICATION OF ADJACENT PARCELS: NORTH: C6 so`QTFf - -- €*s-T._ S: application forms /development review /basic application.doc i 1 COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT N U TQ�E2 4 2000 170P CHEERLEADERS uuuu P AT 3006 G U L F-T O -BAY B O U L E VA L NNING & DEVELOPV CITY OF CLEARWr 1. The existing building does not conform to the required front setback due to the widening of Gulf -to -Bay Boulevard. When the structure was built, Gulf -to -Bay Boulevard was a two -lane, two -way road and the building setback met the City criteria at that time. 2. The redevelopment of said property will complement abutting properties by reducing the impervious surface area and the addition of landscaped green space. This will incorporate the planting of viburnum along the perimeter along with crepe myrtle trees and india hawthorne and magnolia trees along Gulf -to- Bay Boulevard. Interior landscaped greenspace will include oleander, plumbago, lirope and philodendron. The property is currently assessed at $168,000 and proposed assessment will be $180,000. 3. The project site lies within the commercial zoning district and complies with the uses permitted in the City of Clearwater codes. The proposed establishment will be a nightclub, no adult use is proposed. 4. As the project site was previously permitted as an adult use, it is proposed to change the use to a nightclub, permitted in the "C" District, it is compatible with the adjacent land uses. The property to the north is office, to the east is restaurant and to the west is a gas station. 5. The project site comprises an existing building and parking and therefore renovation is all that will be required to open for business. Other sites along Gulf -to -Bay Boulevard are cost prohibitive to the client. 6. The reduction of impervious surface area within the project site reduces the required perimeter landscape buffer will create a safer entrance drive area along with more interior greenspace to compensate for the reduced perimeter landscape buffer area. 7. The addition of greenspace to the project site along with the new landscaping along Gulf -to -Bay Boulevard will enhance the aesthetic view and property value of the site and neighboring lands. 8. The reduction in perimeter landscape buffer area and required parking spaces increases the beautification of the project site, while still providing for the access to the building and its use. 9. Reduction of parking spaces is to provide for the protection and survivability of the existing oaks. �4 Pit 17 di'gelw� A�it Qk-(W P�, PW L Im, LL ^,s. ,7 Updated as of 3/13/02 > ater U Note: Times are subject to change. AGENDA DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE March 14, 2002 9:00 a.m. Staff Review 10:00 a.m. Case: FL 02 -02 -06 —1100 South Missouri Avenue Owner /Applicant: The Clearwater Group, Ltd. Location: 3.27 acres located on the west side of South Missouri Avenue approximately 300 feet south of Druid Road. Atlas Page: 296A and 306A Zoning: C, Commercial District. Request: Flexible Development approval to allow attached dwellings in the Commercial District as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. Proposed Use: A 116 -unit apartment complex as part of the Renaissance Square Apartment Complex in the Commercial District Presenter: Mark T. Parry, Planner. Attendees included: City Staff: Mark Parry, Mike Gust, Tom Glenn, Rick Albee, Don Melone, Lisa Fierce, Elliott Shoberg and Joe Colbert, Applicant/Representative: Ed Armstrong, Edward Mazur, Jayne Sears. The DRC reviewed these applications with the following comments: 1. Parks and Recreation a) Recreation Land and Recreation Facility impact fees due for additional residential units prior to issuance of building permits. Open Space impact fees do not apply since floor area of total development continues to be within the 50% expansion threshold of previous floor area (mall and theater). Contact Deb Richter 562 -4817. 2. Stormwater• a) No comment 3. Traffic engineering: a) Need site plan to identify parcel lines. b) Need plat consistent with site plan, including identification of Parcels 2, 5A, 5B. c) Need to clarify handicap access to garage elevators. d) All parking per City Standards, show handicap spaces as such. e) All above comments to be addressed/clarified prior to review by CDB. DRC agenda — March 14, 2002 - Page 1 I 4. General engineering: a) Site data table for Parcel #1 and #5: Cross access, shared utilities and cross parking will be dedicated ........ what does this mean? b) Parcel #5 site plan: Proposed retail space: no sidewalk shown to most southerly tenant space, landscape buffer shown. c) Note: Resident only and emergency vehicles ingress /egress? d) Declaration of Reciprocal Easement: Need to provide a copy to the City; e) Plat to be recorded prior to issuance of any building permits; fl The above comments (a — e) to be addressed/clarified prior to CDB review; g) Need to install sidewalk in the area where the drive apron within Parcel #7 is being removed; h) Drive apron shown in Parcel #513? (per proposed plat) to be removed (need DOT right - of -way permit); i) Need to provide a continuous sidewalk to be installed along all right -of -ways per DOT Standards_ and Specifications; j) New sanitary sfteeWye,o, ut of manhole: New invert to be cored; k) The above comments (g. j) need to be addressed prior to the issuance of any permits 5. Planning: a) This case needs to go back to the CDB per the Development Order for last year's approval. It really needs to be clarified as to why the original approval (last year) states that there will be 156 units and this application calls for 116 (calling it an increase of 11 units). b) All signage to meet `old" Code and to be submitted prior to review by CDB; c) Rendered elevations (with cardinal direction indicated) required prior to review by CDB; d) Need more continuity between building colour and design. Clarify prior to review by CDB review; e) Show parcel lines on all plans prior to review by CDB; f) Ingress /egress easements to be shown on the site plans (notes will do) prior to review by CDB. 6. Solid waste: a) Angle wrong on Wendy's enclosure, enclosure on south side no exit to far to back up. Remove enclosure from Parcel 2. Revise site plan prior to the issuance of a Development Order. b) Clarify how solid waste will be handled prior to review by the CDB. 7. Land resource: a) No Comment. 8. Fire: a) Fire Department Connections must be within 40 to 50 feet of a fire hydrant and at least 15 feet from buildings. Revise prior to review by the CDB. 9. Landscaping: a) Landscape plan to match landscaping associated with the rest of the "Sunshine Mall" site. Submit prior to either any permits of CDB review - whichever will happen first. NOTES: • Revised site plans to be resubmitted to Staff by February 19, 2002; • CDB date: April 16, 2002; • Fax comments to Ed Mazur at 724.8606 DRAFT CONDITIONS OF DEVELOPMENT ORDER • That all Recreation Land and Recreation Facility impact fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; DRC agenda — March 14, 2002 - Page 2 11:00 a.m. Case: FLS 02- 02 -16— 655 South Gulfview Boulevard Applicant: Mr. Stephen Ginez (Quality Hotel). Representative: Mr. Ed Armstrong (Johnson Blakely et. al.). Location: 1.51 -acres located on the south side of South Gulfview Boulevard, approximately 500 feet west of Parkway Drive. Atlas Page: 285A. Zoning: T, Tourist District. i Request: Flexible Standard Development approval to permit retail sales and service as an accessory use to an existing hotel under the provision of Section 2 -802 and 3 -201. Proposed Use: An 85 square -foot kiosk located to the rear of the building on the south corner of the site within the existing pool area, as accessory to the existing hotel. Presenter: Mark T. Parry, Planner. Attendees included: City Staff: Mark Parry, Mike Gust, Tom Glenn, Rick Albee, Don Melone, Lisa Fierce, Elliott Shoberg and Joe Colbert, Applicant: Mr. Ed Armstrong. The DRC reviewed these applications with the following comments: 1. Parks and Recreation a) No comments 2. Stormwater• a) No comments 3. Traffic engineering: a) No comments 4. General engineering: a) No comments 5. Planning: a) All illegal signage on the site to be removed prior to the issuance of a Development Order — contact Mary Jo Fox at 562 -4726 6. Solid waste: a) No comments 7. Land resource: a) No comments 8. Fire: a) The following conditions must be met prior to final inspection: ■ If thatch roof, must be fire retardant with certification. Minimum size 2AlOBC fire extinguisher with a current tag mounted at an accessible location. 9. Landscaping: a) No comments NOTES: • Revised site plans to be resubmitted to Staff by June 14, 2002. • Fax comments to Ed Armstrong at 727.441.8617 DRAFT CONDITIONS OF DEVELOPMENT ORDER • That all requirements of the Fire Department be met prior to final inspection; DRC agenda — March 14, 2002 - Page 3 11:15 a.m. Case: FL 02 -02 -04 — 3006 Gulf -to -Bay Boulevard Applicant/Owner: Thanh Phuoc Nguyen. Representative: Mr. Patrick T. Maguire, Esq. Location: 0.28 acres located on the north side of Gulf -to -Bay Boulevard, approximately 42 feet west of Meadow Lark Lane. Atlas Page: 292A. �,/ Zoning: C, Commercial District. tRequest: Flexible Development approval to reduce the required number of parking spaces from 15 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area (32 spaces) to 8.5 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area (18 spaces), reduce the front (south) setback from 25 feet to 3.6 feet to building and 12 feet to pavement, reduce the side (west) setback from 10 feet to three feet to pavement, reduce the side (east) setback from 10 feet to zero feet to a dumpster enclosure and five feet to pavement, reduce the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to 1.5 feet to pavement and to permit direct access to a major arterial road (Gulf -to -Bay Boulevard), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2 -704 with Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Section 3 -1202. Proposed Use: A restaurant within an existing one -story 2,132 square foot masonry block building, with access onto Gulf to Bay Boulevard. Presenter: Wayne Wells, Senior Planner. Attendees included: City Staff: Mark Parry, Mike Gust, Tom Glenn, Rick Albee, Don Melone, Lisa Fierce, Elliott Shoberg and Joe Colbert, Applicant: Mr. Patrick T. Maguire, Thanh Phuoc Nguyen. The DRC reviewed these applications with the following comments: 1. Parks and Recreation a) No Comments 2. Stormwater• a) No Comments 3. Traffic engineering: a) All parking, including handicap per City Standards prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 4. General engineering: a) No comments 5. Planning: a) The site data table on Sheet C3.1 of the site plan must be amended as follows: The existing and proposed building coverage should be 17.27 %, not 17.43 %; ■ The required F.A.R. is 0.55, not 0.40; ■ It appears that existing paved vehicular use area is being removed to provide more overall open space and interior landscaping. However, the provided paved vehicular use area is greater than the existing paved vehicular use area. Please check your calculations and revise accordingly (including proposed paved vehicular use area if necessary). ■ The existing impervious surface and open space square footage and percentage of the gross site do not add up to the gross site area (when adding appropriate numbers) (see also above comment); ■ Confirm the existing and proposed parking lot interior landscaping square footage and percentage of the vehicular use area calculations; ■ The required number of parking spaces is 32 spaces; and ■ The parking calculations should be based on 18 spaces being provided, which produces a parking ratio used of 8.823 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. b) The site plan must be clarified as to whether the existing asphalt or turf block is being removed from the locations adjacent to the 10 -inch, 13 -inch and 18 -inch oak trees, which are not being shown or calculated as parking spaces. If these areas are to become DRC agenda — March 14, 2002 - Page 4 landscaped areas, please indicate that curbing or other measures acceptable to Code to ensure non - encroachment by vehicles into these areas. c) If pavement (asphalt or turf block) is being removed from these areas, ensure that the site data reflects such. d) Dimension the width of the landscape buffer area on the west and east sides of the site. e) The dumpster enclosure will be needed built to City specifications. f) All of the above must be done prior to the CDB review. 6. Solid waste: a) Dumpster enclosure will be needed built to city specs. Revise site plan prior to review by the CDB. 7. Land resource: a) No Comments 8. Fire: a) No Comments 9. Landscaping: a) No comments. NOTES: • Revised site plans to be resubmitted to Staff by March 19, 2002. • CDB date: April 16, 2002 • Fax comments to Patrick Maguire at 727 - 446 -3741 DRAFT CONDITIONS OF DEVELOPMENT ORDER • That all parking spaces, including handicap, meet all City Standards prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; DRC agenda — March 14, 2002 - Page 5 12:00 a.m. Case: FLS 02 -02 -15 — 2575 Gulf to Bay Boulevard Applicant: Sam's Wholesale Club. Representative: Mr. Jason McMillan. Location: 20.9 -acres located on the southwest corner of Gulf to Bay Boulevard and U.S. Highway 19 North. Atlas Page: 299B. Zoning: C, Commercial District. Request: Flexible Standard Development approval to permit an automotive service station within the Commercial District and to reduce the required parking for a retail sales /service establishment from five spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area (676 spaces) to 4.72 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area (638 spaces), under the provisions of Section 2 -703. Proposed Use: The application includes the establishment of a six island, 12 pump automotive service station with a 77 square foot attendant booth. Presenter: Mark T. Parry, Planner. Attendees included: City Staff: Mark Parry, Mike Gust, Tom Glenn, Rick Albee, Don Melone, Lisa Fierce, Elliott Shoberg and Joe Colbert, - Applicant: Jason McMillan. The DRC reviewed these applications with the following comments: 1. Parks and Recreation a) No comments 2. Stormwater• a) Stormwater Calcs required prior to the issuance of a Development Order; 3. Traffic engineering: a) No comments 4. General engineering: a) Water main to be relocated 5 ft from any structures, tanks, and etc. Revise site plans prior to issuance of a Development Order. 5. Planning: a) No comments 6. Solid waste: a) Clarify how solid waste will be handled prior to the issuance of a Development Order. / -- _7. _ Land resource: a) The 5.5" elm at the NE corner and the 5.5" Laurel Oak at the SW corner are declining and should be removed. Submit for tree removal permit at time of building permit application. 8. Fire: a) Must meet Fire Code requirements for Service Stations as per NFPA 30A and NFPA 1 prior to final inspection for C.O. 9. Landscaping: a) There is an area along the west side of the construction site that is paved and may be able to be turned into landscaping — revise or clarify site plans prior to the issuance of a Development Order NOTES: • Revised site plans to be resubmitted to Staff by June 14, 2002. • Fax comments to Jason McMillan at 863.648.1106 DRAFT CONDITIONS OF DEVELOPMENT ORDER • That all declining trees be removed through approved tree removal permits prior to the issuance of any building permits; • That all Fire Department requirements for automotive service stations under the provisions of NFPA 30A and 1 be met prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - - - - -- DRC agenda — March 14, 2002 - Page 6 LUNCH 12:30-1:30 1:45 p.m. Case: FLS 02- 02 -14— 65 Verbena Street Applicant: Mr. & Mrs. John Doran. Representative: Mr. F. Chris Hensler (Avante -Garde Builders, Inc). Location; 0.18 -acres located on the southwest corner of Verbena Street and Narcissus Avenue. Atlas Page: 249A. Zoning: LMDR, Low Medium Density Residential District. Request: Flexible Standard Development approval to reduce the front (east) setback from 25 feet to 12 feet (to garage addition) along Narcissus Street, as part of a Residential Infill Project under the provision of Section 2 -203. Proposed Use: The application includes a 442 square foot, garage addition to the east side of the house along Narcissus Avenue. Presenter; Mark T. Parry, Planner. Attendees included: City Staff: Mark Parry, Mike Gust, Tom Glenn, Rick Albee, Don Melone, Lisa Fierce - Elliott Shoberg and Joe Colbert, Applicant: Mr. F. Chris Hensler. The DRC reviewed these applications with the following comments: 1. Parks and Recreation a) No comments 2. Stormwater• a) Any living space has to be equal in elevation to the existing house pad or 1 foot above the crown of road. Revise site plan to indicate this prior to the issuance of any permits 3. Traffic engineering: a) The garage needs to be moved back 20 feet from the property line along the r.o.w. (Narcissus Avenue) to provide adequate off street parking - revise site plan prior to the issuance of a Development Order. 4. General engineering: a) No comments 5. Planning: a) The garage needs to be moved back 20 feet from the property line along the no.w. (Narcissus Avenue) to provide adequate off street parking - revise site plan prior to the issuance of a Development Order 6. Solid waste: a) No comments 1. Land resource: a) Submit a revised tree survey, including all trees 4" DBH prior to building permit. 8. Fire: a) No comments 9. Landscaping: a) No comments NOTES: • Revised site plans to be resubmitted to Staff by June 14, 2002. • Fax comments to Fredrick Hensler at 727.446.3622 DRAFT CONDITIONS OF DEVELOPMENT ORDER • That revised tree survey indicating all trees 4" DBH and greater be submitted to Staff prior to the issuance of any permits; • That a site plan be submitted which indicates that any living space be equal in elevation to the existing house pad or one foot above the crown of road prior to the issuance of any permits. DRC agenda — March 14, 2002 - Page 7 2:00 p.m. Case: FLS 02- 02 -18— 312 Windward Island Applicant: Mr. & Mrs. Rory Hiller. Representative: Mr. William D. Davis (WDD & Associates, Inc). Location: 0.23 -acres located on the west side of Windward Island, approximately 1,250 north of Windward Passage. Atlas Page: 268A. Zoning: LMDR, Low Medium Density Residential District. Request: Flexible Standard Development approval to reduce the front (east) setback from 25 feet to two feet (to carport) along Windward Island, as part of a Residential Infill Project under the provisions of Section 2 -203. Proposed Use: A 460 square foot carport as accessory to an existing, single - family dwelling. Presenter: Mark T. Parry, Planner. Attendees included: City Staff. Mark Parry, Mike Gust, Tom Glenn, Rick Albee, Don Melone, Lisa Fierce, Elliott Shoberg and Joe Colbert, Applicant! Mr. William D. Davis, Mr. & Mrs. Rory Hiller The DRC reviewed these applications with the following comments: 1. Parks and Recreation a) No comments 2. Stormwater: a) No comments 3. Traffic engineering: a) No comments 4. General engineering: a) No comments S. Planning: a) It's still not neighborhood. 6. Solid waste: a) No comments 7. Land resource: a) No comments 8. Fire: a) No comments 9. Landscaping: a) No comments clear how this development is consistent with the character of the This must be addressed prior to the issuance of a Development Order NOTES: • Revised site plans to be resubmitted to Staff by June 14, 2002. • Fax comments to William Davie at 727.573.9894 DRAFT CONDITIONS OF DEVELOPMENT ORDER DRC agenda — March 14, 2002 - Page 8 2:30 p.m. Case: FLS 02 -02 -17 — 934 Narcissus Avenue Applicant: Mr. & Mrs. Bradley Uline and Ms. Josephine Avery. Location: The 0.17 -acre site is located on the southwest corner of Narcissus Avenue and Aurel Street. Atlas Page: 238A. Zoning: LMDR, Low Medium Density Residential District. Request: Flexible Standard Development approval to reduce the required front (east and north) setback along Narcissus Avenue and Aurel Street, respectively, from 25 feet to 15 feet (to front porch), reduce the required front (north) setback along Aurel Street from 25 feet to 13 feet (to garage) and reduce the required side (west) setback from five feet to three feet (to garage), as part of a Residential Infill Project under the provisions of Section 2 -203. Proposed Use: The application includes a 522 square foot, two -story garage and a 555 square foot, wrap- around, front porch, in association with an existing single - family dwelling. Presenter: Mark Parry, Planner. Attendees included: City Staff: Mark Parry, Mike Gust, Tom Glenn, Rick Albee, Don Melone, Lisa Fierce, Elliott Shoberg and Joe Colbert; - Applicant: Mr. & Mrs. Bradley Uline and Ms. Josephine Avery. The DRC reviewed these applications with the following comments: 1. Parks and Recreation a) No comments 2. Stormwater• a) No comments 3. Traffic engineering: a) Need 20 ft minimum setback along Laurel Street so parked vehicle does not block sidewalk. 4. General engineering: a) The structure may not be built within the side (west) five -foot easement - revise site plan prior to issuance of a Development Order OR secure a vacation of the easement prior to the issuance of a Development Order 5. Planning: a) The garage will have to be moved in order to provide a minimum of 20 feet of setback from the r.o.w.(along Aurel Street) Revise prior to the issuance of a Development Order. . b) The second floor of the garage needs to be discussed — it cannot be used as a dwelling unit and the square footage of that second story may not exceed 10 percent of the gross floor area of the existing dwelling (including the proposed attached garage). If there are any other accessory structures on site (i.e. sheds) the square footage of those structure would be subtracted from the amount of square footage for accessory structures permitted (10 percent of the gross floor area of the house and proposed garage). c) Create an access point between the existing house and the proposed, attached garage. Revise site plan prior to the issuance of a Development Order. d) How is the architecture of a two -story garage consistent with a neighborhood that is primarily one -story homes? Clarify prior to the issuance of a Development Order. e) Check with building regarding FEMA requirements prior to the issuance of a Development Order. 6. Solid waste: a) No comments ( 7. Land resource: a) The 24" Spruce is actually a Cuban Laurel with has previously been topped, has a major cavity and has a fungus (possibly Heart Rot). This tree will be affected by the proposed construction and may need to be removed. Secure tree removal permits at time of building permit. 8. Fire: a) No comments DRC agenda — March 14, 2002 - Page 9 9. Landscaping: a) No comments NOTES: • Revised site plans to be resubmitted to Staff by June 14, 2002. • Fax comments to Bradley Uline at 727 - 725 -1776 DRAFT CONDITIONS OF DEVELOPMENT ORDER • That all declining trees be removed and all applicable tree removal permits be obtained prior to the issuance of any building permits: DRC agenda — March 14, 2002 - Page 10 2:45 p.m. Case: FLS 02 -02 -22 — 2833 Meadow Hill Drive Applicant: Mr. & Mrs. Warren Hunt. Representative: Mr. Barry Ullmann. Location: The 0.60 -acre site is located on the south side of Meadow Hill Drive, approximately 450 feet west of Landmark Drive. Atlas Page: 200B. Zoning: LDR, Low Density Residential District. Request: Flexible Standard Development approval to reduce the required side (south) setback from 15 feet to 10 feet, as part of a Residential Infill Project under the provisions of Section 2 -103. Proposed Use: The application includes a 340 square foot pool cabana in association with an existing single - family dwelling replacing an existing pool cabana. Presenter: Mark Parry, Planner. Attendees included: City Staff! Mark Parry, Mike Gust, Tom Glenn, Rick Albee, Don Melone, Lisa Fierce, Elliott Shoberg and Joe Colbert, Applicant: Mr. Barry Ullmann. The DRC reviewed these applications with the following comments: 1. Parks and Recreation a) No comments 2. Stormwater• a) No comments 3. Traffic engineering: a) No comments 4. General engineering: a) No comments 5. Planning: a) That the addition not be used a separate living unit. 6. Solid waste• a) No comments 7. Land resource: a) No comments 8. Fire: a) No comments 9. Landscaping: a) No comments NOTES: • Revised site plans to be resubmitted to Staff by June 14, 2002. • Fax comments to Barry Ullmann at 727 - 441 -4405 DRAFT CONDITIONS OF DEVELOPMENT ORDER • That the addition not be used a separate living unit. DRC agenda — March 14, 2002 - Page 11 3:00 p.m. Case: FL 02 -02 -03 —18 Glendale Street Applicant: Mr. Scott Oglivie. Location: 0.10 -acres located on the north side of Glendale Street, approximately 150 feet west of Mandalay Avenue. Atlas Page: 258A. Zoning: MHDR, Medium High Density Residential District. Request: Flexible Development approval to reduce the required front (south) setback from 25 feet to zero feet (to deck) and to reduce the side (west) setback from 10 feet to two feet (to deck) under the provisions of Section 2 -403. Proposed Use: A 264 square foot wood deck as accessory to an existing single - family dwelling. Presenter: Wayne Wells, Senior Planner. Attendees included: City Staff. Mark Parry, Mike Gust, Tom Glenn, Rick Albee, Don Melone, Lisa Fierce, Elliott Shoberg and Joe Colbert, Applicant: Mr. Scott Oglivie. The DRC reviewed these applications with the following comments: 1. Parks and Recreation a) No comments 2. Stormwater• a) No comments 3. Traffic engineering: a) No comments 4. General engineering: a) Need to remove all vertical obstacles in right -of -way. Revise site plan prior to review by CDB; b) Need to update survey to show deck. Revise site plan prior to review by CDB; c) Need to obtain right -of -way permit for landscaping in right -of -way prior to installation. 5. Planning: a) All after - the -fact building permits must be obtained by 6/16/02 and final inspections be obtained by 9/16/02 6. Solid waste: a) No comments 7. Land resource: a) No comments 8. Fire: a) No comments 9. Landscaping: a) Submit a final landscape plan to Staff for approval prior to the issuance of any permits. NOTES: • Revised site plans to be resubmitted to Staff by March 19, 2002. • CDB date: April 16, 2002 • Fax comments to Mr. Scott Oglivie at DRAFT CONDITIONS OF DEVELOPMENT ORDER • That all required building permits be obtained by May 16, 2002 and final inspections be obtained by June 16, 2002. DRC agenda — March 14, 2002 - Page 12 3:20 p.m. Case: FLS 02 -02 -21 — 520 Cleveland Street Applicant: Mr. & Mrs. Peter Panagauliase Representative: Mr. Nigel Castanheiro. Location: 0.46 -acres located on the north side of Cleveland Street, approximately 50 feet west of Waterson Avenue. Atlas Page! 286B. Zoning: D, Downtown District. Request: Flexible Standard Development approval to permit a nightclub within the Downtown District under the provisions of Section 2 -902. Proposed Use: An 8,000 square foot, two -story nightclub within the Downtown District. Presenter: Mark Parry, Planner. Attendees included: City Staff: Mark Parry, Mike Gust, Tom Glenn, Rick Albee, Don Melone, Lisa Fierce, Elliott Shoberg and Joe Colbert, Applicant: Nigel Castanheiro. The DRC reviewed these applications with the following comments: - - - - - 1. Parks and Recreation a) No comments 2. Stormwater• a) No comments 3. Traffic engineering: a) No comments 4. General engineering: a) Handicap parking and access to be provided per City, State and ADA Standards. 5. Planning; a) Paint chip or samples required prior to the issuance of a Development Order; b) Rendered elevations required prior to the issuance of a Development Order; c) Address how the development will MINIMIZE traffic congestion prior to the issuance of a Development Order; d) That all signage meet the requirements of Code prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. e) . That no outdoor coolers or other structure be permitted in association with this development. f) That any other changes to the fagade of the building be reviewed by the Development Review Board as part of a Flexible Standard Development application. 6. Solid waste: a) How will solid waste be handled - clarify prior to the issuance of a Development Order. 7. Land resource: a) No comments 8. Fire: a) Assembly requires a two (2) hour separation from adjoining occupancies. Revise site plan prior to the issuance of any permits. b) One exit from the second (2nd) floor must be one (1) hour rated and direct to the outside. Revise site plan prior to the issuance of any permits. 9. Landscaping: a) No comments NOTES: • Revised site plans to be resubmitted to Staff by June 14, 2002. • Fax comments to Nigel Castanheiro at 813 - 354 -2327 DRAFT CONDITIONS OF DEVELOPMENT ORDER DRC agenda — March 14, 2002 - Page 13 • That all Fire Department requirements be met including the provision of a two hour separation and that all required exits be shown on a site plan prior to the issuance of any permits; • That all required handicap points of access be shown on a site plan prior to the issuance of any permit; • That no outdoor coolers or other structure be permitted in association with this development; • That all signage meet the requirements of Code prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; and • That any other changes to the fagade of the building be reviewed by the Development Review Board as part of a Flexible Standard Development application. DRC agenda — March 14, 2002 - Page 14 3:40 p.m. Cases: FLS 02- 02- 19/FLS 02 -02 -20 — 390/391 East Shore Drive Applicant: City of Clearwater. Representative: Mr. Timothy Kurtz, PWA. Location: 0.63 -acres containing Lots A and B located at the northwest and northeast corners of Causeway Boulevard and East Shore Drive, respectively: Lot A (390 East Shore Drive) is approximately 0.37 acres; Lot 13 (391 East Shore Drive) is approximately 0.27 acres. Atlas Page: 267A. Zoning: I, Institutional District (390 East Shore Drive); I, Institutional District and T, Tourist District (391 East Shore Drive). Request: Flexible Standard Development to permit a non - residential, off - street parking facility within the Tourist and Institutional Districts under the provisions of Section 2 -802 and 2 -1203, respectively. Proposed Use: The establishment of two parking lots: Lot A will contain 24 parking spaces and Lot B will contain 17 parking spaces. Presenter: Mark T. Parry, Planner. Attendees included: - City Staff: Mark Parry, Mike Gust, -Tom Glenn, Rick Albee, Don Melone, Lisa Fierce,. Elliott - Shoberg and Joe Colbert, Applicant: City of Clearwater — Brian Barker, Tim Kurtz. The DRC reviewed these applications with the following comments: 1. Parks and Recreation a) P &R maintenance staff reviewing plans for impacts and will work directly with Public Works. Contact Brian Murphree (462 -6139) 2. Stormwater• a) No comments 3. Traffic engineering: a) Need 'Right Turn Only" and "Do Not Enter" signs at exit onto Poinsettia. — revise prior to issuance of a Development Order. 4. General engineering: a) No comments 5. Planning: a) Show existing spaces to the north of Lot B —associated with Bare Foot Bay Resort; b) No approval of the psta shelter on the south side of the causeway 6. Solid waste: a) Will there be any street cans in parking lots and if so who will service them. Clarify prior to the issuance of a Development Order. 7. Land resource: a) No comments 8. Fire: a) No comments 9. Landscaping: a) No comments NOTES: • Revised site plans to be resubmitted to Staff by June 14, 2002. • Fax comments to Tim Kurtz at 727.562.4737 DRAFT CONDITIONS OF DEVELOPMENT ORDER DRC agenda — March 14, 2002 - Page 15 4:00 p.m. Case: ANX 02 -02 -02 - 7 & 10 Hampton Road Owners /Applicant: Robert G. Gabriel & Margaret A. Gabriel, Williams C. Caruthers & Mary K. Caruthers, Limited Properties, Inc. /James F. Burns; Joseph J. Sorota, Jr. Trustee of FL Land Trust #172916/Brandon Realty Venture, Inc. Location: 4.22 acres located on the east side of Hampton Road, approximately 270 feet north of Gulf -to -Bay Boulevard. Atlas Page: 291B. Request: (a) Annexation of 4.22 acres to the City of Clearwater; (b) Land Use Plan amendment from RU, Residential Urban (County) to Residential/Office Limited (R/OL) (pending case # LUZ 02- 02 -02); and (c) Rezoning from R -R, Rural Residential & A -E, Agricultural Estate Residential Districts (County) to Office (0). Presenter: Etim Udoh, Senior Planner. Attendees included: City Staff. Mark Parry, Mike Gust, Tom Glenn, Rick Albee, Don Melone, Lisa Fierce, Elliott Shoberg and Joe Colbert, Applicant: we The DRC reviewed these applications with the following comments: 1. Parks and Recreation a) No P &R comment 2. Stormwater• a) Will need to provide Stormwater calcs with the development 3. Traffic engineering: a) No comments 4. General engineering: a) Use one address — 7 Hampton road (not 10) b) They need to extend utilities to serve the property S. Planning: a) No comments 6. Solid waste: a) No comments 7. Land resource: a) No comments 8. Fire: a) No comments 9. Landscaping: a) No comments NOTES: • Revised site plans to be resubmitted to Staff by February 19, 2002. • CDB date: April 16, 2002; • City Commission meeting, first reading date: May 16, 2002; • City Commission meeting, second reading date: June 6, 2002; DRC agenda — March 14, 2002 - Page 16 Case: LUZ 02 -02 -02 — 7 & 10 Hampton Road Owners /Applicant: Robert G. Gabriel & Margaret A. Gabriel; Williams C. Caruthers & Mary K. Caruthers; Limited Properties, Inc. /James F. Burns; Joseph J. Sorota, Jr. Trustee of FL Land Trust #172916 and Carol D. Allen, Trustee of Carol D. Allen/Brandon Realty Venture, Inc. Location: Atlas Page: 291B. Request: 4.22 acres located on the east side of Hampton Road, approximately 270 feet north of Gulf -to -Bay Boulevard. (a) Land Use Plan amendment from RU, Residential Urban Classification to R/OL, Residential/Office Limited (pending case # ANX 02- 02 -02); and (b) Rezoning from R -R, Rural Residential & A -E, Agricultural Estate Residential Districts (County) to O, Office (pending case # ANX 02- 02 -02). Presenter: Etim Udoh, Senior Planner. Attendees included: City Staff: Mark Parry, Mike Gust, Tom Glenn, Rick Albee, Don Melone, Lisa Fierce, Elliott Shoberg and Joe Colbert, Applicant: The DRC reviewed these applications with the following comments: 1. Parks and Recreation a) No P &R comment 2. Stormwater• a) Need calculations with site plan that meet requirements 3. Traffic engineering: a) Gave comments to etim — no significant issues; no change in LOS on either Hampton road or gulf to bay boulevard 4. General engineering: a) No comments 5. Planning: a) No comments 6. Solid waste: a) No comments 7. Land resource: a) No comments 8. Fire: a) Meet all fire code including adequate number of hydrants 9. Landscaping: a) No comments NOTES: • Revised site plans to be resubmitted to Staff by February 19, 2002. • CDB date: April 16, 2002; • City Commission meeting, first reading date: May 16, 2002; • City Commission meeting, second reading date: June 6, 2002; DRC agenda — March 14, 2002 - Page 17 4:15 p.m. Case: LUZ 02- 02 -01— 2575 Hare Boulevard Owner /Applicant: James G. Nichols & Anastesia S. Nichols/Long Bow Corporation. Location: 0.84 acres located on the south side of Ham Boulevard, approximately 420 feet west of U.S. 19 North. Atlas Page: 309B. Request: b) Land Use Plan amendment from CG, Commercial General Classification to RH, Residential High Classification c) Rezoning from C, Commercial District to MHDR, Medium High Density Residential District. Presenter: Etim Udoh, Senior Planner. Attendees included: City Staff: Mark Parry, Mike Gust, Tom Glenn, Rick Albee, Don Melone, Lisa Fierce, Elliott Shoberg and Joe Colbert, Applicant: The DRC reviewed these applications with the following comments: - 1. Parks and Recreation a) No P &R comment 2. Stormwater: a) Will need to submit calculations with site plan 3. Traffic engineering: a) No comments 4. General engineering: a) No comments 5. Planning; a) No comments 6. Solid waste: a) No comments 7. Land resource: a) No comments 8. Fire: a) Will need to meet fire code including provision of adequate hydrants 9. Landscaping: a) No comments NOTES: • Revised site plans to be resubmitted to Staff by February 19, 2002. • CDB date: April 16, 2002; • City Commission meeting, first reading date: May 16, 2002; • City Commission meeting, second reading date: June 6, 2002; DRC agenda — March 14, 2002 - Page 18 4:30 p.m. Case: ANX 02 -02 -03 - 25633 U.S. 19 North (arr. 4:25 p.m.) Owner /Applicant: Lawrence H. Dimmitt, III NOTES: • Revised site plans to be resubmitted to Staff by February 19, 2002. • CDB date: April 16,2002; • City Commission meeting, first reading date: May 16, 2002; • City Commission meeting, second reading date: June 6, 2002; DRC agenda — March 14, 2002 - Page 19 Agent: Harry S. Cline Esq. Location: 1.04 acres located on the east side of U.S. 19 North and west of Lake Chautauqua and north of First Avenue North. Atlas Page: 233A. Request: (a) Annexation of 1.04 acres to the City of Clearwater. (b) Land Use Plan amendment from R/O/R, Residential/Office/Retail (County) to Residential/Office/Retail (R/O/R); and (c) Rezoning from CP -I, Professional District (County) to C, Commercial District (Clearwater). Presenter: Etim Udoh, Senior Planner. Attendees included: City Staff! Mark Parry, Mike Gust, Tom Glenn, Rick Albee, Don Melone, Lisa Fierce, Elliott Shoberg and Joe Colbert, Applicant: The DRC reviewed these applications with the following comments: 1. Parks and Recreation a) No P &R comment 2. Stormwater• a) Will need to submit calcs with site plan 3. Traffic engineering: a) Concerned about back out parking into street 4. General engineering; a) No comments 5. Planning: a) Signage to meet code? Any billboards on the property? b) Using this for auto storage? 6. Solid waste: a) Dumpster enclosures to meet code 7. Land resource: a) No comments 8. Fire: a) No comments 9. Landscaping: a) No comments NOTES: • Revised site plans to be resubmitted to Staff by February 19, 2002. • CDB date: April 16,2002; • City Commission meeting, first reading date: May 16, 2002; • City Commission meeting, second reading date: June 6, 2002; DRC agenda — March 14, 2002 - Page 19 4:45 p.m. Case: ANX 02 -02 -04 - 2301 Chautauqua Avenue (Proposed) (arr. 4:25 p.m.) Owner /Applicant: Lawrence H. Dimmitt, III & Larry H. Dimmitt, Jr. Agent: Harry S. Cline Esq. Location: 23 acres located on the east side of Chautauqua Avenue and west of Lake Chautauqua Atlas Pages: 233A & 244A. Request: (a) Annexation of 23 acres to the City of Clearwater. Presenter: Etim Udoh, Senior Planner. Attendees included: City Staff: Mark Parry, Mike Gust, Tom Glenn, Rick Albee, Don Melone, Lisa Fierce, Elliott Shoberg and Joe Colbert, Applicant: '' W The DRC reviewed these applications with the following comments: 1. Parks and Recreation a) Recreation Land & Recreation Facilities impact fees need to be addressed for this property prior -to final; reading .of ordinance - effectuating. annexation- per Chapter 54. Contact Deb Richter at 562 -4817 2. Stormwater: a) Will need to provide calcs with site plan 3. Traffic engineering: a) No comments 4. General engineering: a) No comments 5. Planning: a) Need legal description of the proposed Preservation District 6. Solid waste: a) No comments 7. Land resource: a) No comments 8. Fire: a) Will need to meet fire code with adequate hydrants 9. Landscaping: a) No comments NOTES: • Revised site plans to be resubmitted to Staff by February 19, 2002. • CDB date: April 16, 2002; • City Commission meeting, first reading date: May 16, 2002; • City Commission meeting, second reading date: June 6, 2002; DRC agenda — March 14, 2002 - Page 20 Case: LUZ 02 -02 -03 — 2301 Chautauqua Avenue (Proposed) Owner /Applicant: Lawrence H. Dimmitt, III & Larry H. Dimmitt, Jr. Agent: Harry S. Cline Esq. Location: 23 acres located on the east side of Chautauqua Avenue and west of Lake Chautauqua Avenue and west of Lake Chautauqua Avenue. Atlas Page: 233A & 244A. Request: (a) Land Use Plan amendment from RS, Residential Suburban & P, Preservation (County) to RU, Residential Urban and Preservation; and (b) Rezoning from R -R, Rural Residential District (County) to LMDR, Low Medium Density Residential & P, Preservation Districts (Clearwater). Presenter: Etim Udoh, Senior Planner. Attendees included: City Staff: Mark Parry, Mike Gust, Tom Glenn, Rick Albee, Don Melone, Lisa Fierce, Elliott Shoberg and Joe Colbert, Applicant: The DRC reviewed these applications with the following comments: 1. Parks and Recreation a) Recreation land and Recreation facilities fees need to be addressed prior to the final reading of ordinance of the annexation — per chapter 54 — see Debbie Richter at 562. 4817 2. Stormwater: a) Will need to submit calculations with site plan 3. Traffic engineering: a) Need a traffic study to show how the level of service on Chatautauqua and US 19 4. General engineering: a) Will need to provide all utilities at applicant's expense 5. Planning: a) No comments 6. Solid waste: a) No comments 7. Land resource: a) No comments 8. Fire: a) Will need to meet fire code with adequate hydrants upon development b) Proper road service to accommodate fire equipment/vehicles 9. Landscaping: a) No comments NOTES: • Revised site plans to be resubmitted to Staff by February 19, 2002. • CDB date: April 16, 2002; • City Commission meeting, first reading date: May 16, 2002; • City Commission meeting, second reading date: June 6, 2002; SAPIanning Department \C D B\agendas DRC & CDS\DRC\2002 \03 March\DRCagenda 03- 14- 02.doc DRC agenda — March 14, 2002 - Page 21 "ow 1W Per thwelope • DO Not M0Mm1 e READ THIS LIMIT OF LIABILITY %ND REMEDY: Photograph processing completed under processor's policies. Submittingiany film, print; slide, r. jative or, digital image to our company for processing, printing, storage, transmis- sion or other handling constituter •tn AGREEMEN -rby you that any damage or loss.by. our company, subsidiaries or agents, even, if caused by neglic " ^e or other fault; will only entitle yoyr to ieplacement•with alike amount of unex- posed filrn'and processing. Exc .. for the eXclusi-ve remedy Of replacement, the handling of film, print, slide, nega- tive or digital'image is without v anty or liability and recovery for any incidental or consequerltial damages is excluded. NOT RESPONSIBL' .)R FILM. LEFT OVER 30"OAYSt -+ `' . •,;:.'' A With KODAK Fiim'' ...Finish Wth ddak "PJlcture ESSING S'r« PR;OC Kodak, Duralife and Advantix are trademarks of Eastman Kodak Company, 1999. "America Online," "AOL` and the logo design are all Registered Trademarks of America Online, Inc., 1999. 'You've Got Pictures' is a Service Mark of America Online- Inc.. 1999. PhotoNet is a trademark of PictureVision, Inc., 1999. r III z�l Ilz .- 031 -9096 647986 PUBLIX #0096 525 BELCHER RD PRA CLEARWATER, FL 33765 -2609 STORE# 0096 (727)799 -3316 RTE# R H Acc-Ot 3D90- 0QQ- v� FIRST NAME PHONE NO. OADDD�R)ESS f VV � �Y 1_ I/ 1 - / 1 /,K- ;M I.0 DATE -i /C. I I — CITY l - l iu,� STATE ZIP ® PRINTS 110 35mm OTHER O COLOR SLIDES BAN FlL.M n FlL.M SIZE ❑ 1A ' TYPE El ❑ ���a P ThenrGStdurable, O R sfarpestpicbrresever. 0 Via AOLe El You've Got �• Pictures- A'�M�,,,,Ej�,��i,c�� Via the Internet El for Non -AOL members wcowna memwvl _- - - PROCESSING - - -- O�ova� q © ©o4G� ' Erclusively an A uX C sr 1 SET Wra 2 SETS with interactive software. I.- PICTURES xc d E a d z 1 SET 2 SETS 1 � 4 POPULAR • sle.wd Negatives — - -- -- PRINTS ADVANCED I I I I I I I @AOL.com 4" glossy prints from 35mm color print film. PHOTO SYSTEM (APS) 1 SET Enter Cassette Fd Number F-1 Q 2 SETS 3" PUBLIX PAIRS # indicated 2 sets of 3" glossy prints from 35mm, 110, 126 and disc color print film. Allow 7 days for 126 and disc color film. Allow 2 days for 110. Kodak Picture Disk, One set or print,, atiry ""m i. tl ordering 2 sets Print Ouamity IndipI. wJl be disregarded. Picture CD and Pictures Online not available. 4' glossy prints only. ue E E -mail, share and order reprints from the Internet. cl z 0 d Z d E cad LL U_E O Z a ri .r: er z ,F4 c E9 o E4 d MO a E E�� ® o • u c b Wo m d E2 !C 4 E p�p S:? ALL E M C ]G U N « O E d m ° o ,off a a R 0 c E `�03� c Q V sr> W n a_ � r � Go >A E y x x E Q Q x E x 0 x - x E C x E o 0 0 •" � A o N E E � U_ .tea E E E C o. N O1 N E 61 E E E ®° �CL E x m o r y E 1= E Eo �6 c O v v i� 76 '6 cc y a W ri d co 0 0 O N co c E to m x x O n x x x o x x x x ;$ R% x IL 4 CD O N CV (7 V I Kodak, Duralife and Advantix are trademarks of Eastman Kodak Company, 1999. "America Online," "AOL` and the logo design are all Registered Trademarks of America Online, Inc., 1999. 'You've Got Pictures' is a Service Mark of America Online- Inc.. 1999. PhotoNet is a trademark of PictureVision, Inc., 1999. r III z�l Ilz .- 031 -9096 647986 PUBLIX #0096 525 BELCHER RD PRA CLEARWATER, FL 33765 -2609 STORE# 0096 (727)799 -3316 RTE# R H Acc-Ot 3D90- 0QQ- v� FIRST NAME PHONE NO. OADDD�R)ESS f VV � �Y 1_ I/ 1 - / 1 /,K- ;M I.0 DATE -i /C. I I — CITY l - l iu,� STATE ZIP ® PRINTS 110 35mm OTHER O COLOR SLIDES BAN FlL.M n FlL.M SIZE ❑ 1A ' TYPE El ❑ ���a P ThenrGStdurable, O R sfarpestpicbrresever. 0 Via AOLe El You've Got �• Pictures- A'�M�,,,,Ej�,��i,c�� Via the Internet El for Non -AOL members wcowna memwvl _- - - PROCESSING - - -- O�ova� q © ©o4G� ' Erclusively an A uX C sr 1 SET Wra 2 SETS with interactive software. I.- PICTURES xc d E [:] 1 SET 2 SETS 1 � 4 POPULAR • sle.wd Negatives — - -- -- PRINTS ADVANCED I I I I I I I @AOL.com 4" glossy prints from 35mm color print film. PHOTO SYSTEM (APS) 1 SET Enter Cassette Fd Number F-1 Q 2 SETS 3" PUBLIX PAIRS # indicated 2 sets of 3" glossy prints from 35mm, 110, 126 and disc color print film. Allow 7 days for 126 and disc color film. Allow 2 days for 110. Kodak Picture Disk, One set or print,, atiry ""m i. tl ordering 2 sets Print Ouamity IndipI. wJl be disregarded. Picture CD and Pictures Online not available. 4' glossy prints only. ue E E -mail, share and order reprints from the Internet. 0 d E cad LL U_E O Z a ri ,F4 o E ® o b m � p�p S:? ALL E M C U N « O E d m ° o ,off a a R c E `�03� c Q V sr> W n a_ � r � Go >A .0 x x E Q Q x x x 0 x - x x x x Kodak, Duralife and Advantix are trademarks of Eastman Kodak Company, 1999. "America Online," "AOL` and the logo design are all Registered Trademarks of America Online, Inc., 1999. 'You've Got Pictures' is a Service Mark of America Online- Inc.. 1999. PhotoNet is a trademark of PictureVision, Inc., 1999. r III z�l Ilz .- 031 -9096 647986 PUBLIX #0096 525 BELCHER RD PRA CLEARWATER, FL 33765 -2609 STORE# 0096 (727)799 -3316 RTE# R H Acc-Ot 3D90- 0QQ- v� FIRST NAME PHONE NO. OADDD�R)ESS f VV � �Y 1_ I/ 1 - / 1 /,K- ;M I.0 DATE -i /C. I I — CITY l - l iu,� STATE ZIP ® PRINTS 110 35mm OTHER O COLOR SLIDES BAN FlL.M n FlL.M SIZE ❑ 1A ' TYPE El ❑ ���a P ThenrGStdurable, O R sfarpestpicbrresever. Ihfblix Via AOLe El You've Got �• Pictures- A'�M�,,,,Ej�,��i,c�� Via the Internet El for Non -AOL members wcowna memwvl _- - - PROCESSING - - -- O�ova� q © ©o4G� ' Erclusively an A uX C sr 1 SET Wra 2 SETS with interactive software. I.- PICTURES Index ftd GLOSSY ONLY FROM 35UM • Date on Back of Rims [:] 1 SET 2 SETS 1 � 4 POPULAR • sle.wd Negatives — - -- -- PRINTS ADVANCED I I I I I I I @AOL.com 4" glossy prints from 35mm color print film. PHOTO SYSTEM (APS) 1 SET Enter Cassette Fd Number F-1 2 SETS • 1:1 2 SETS 3" PUBLIX PAIRS # indicated 2 sets of 3" glossy prints from 35mm, 110, 126 and disc color print film. Allow 7 days for 126 and disc color film. Allow 2 days for 110. Kodak Picture Disk, One set or print,, atiry ""m i. tl ordering 2 sets Print Ouamity IndipI. wJl be disregarded. Picture CD and Pictures Online not available. 4' glossy prints only. E -mail, share and order reprints from the Internet. Kodak Picture CD CD F] Via AOLe El You've Got �• Pictures- A'�M�,,,,Ej�,��i,c�� Via the Internet El for Non -AOL members High - resolution images on a G- KOdakta IIZ!o Vet with interactive software. _ Kodak Picture Disk [:] AOL members only: Enter AOL screen name here. Must also check AOL box above. a-- Screen- resolution images on 3%° IBM I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I @AOL.com format diskette. ift ❑ CHECK HERE if writing in SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS below or if ordering REPRINTS, ENLARGEMENTS or other services on back. 9772 r" G /1 -7 q C2 0319096 9772 r a Planning Department �earwater 1� South Myrtle Avenue � Y Clearwater, Florida 33756 _ Telephone: 727 - 562 -4567 Fax: 727 -562 -4576 ❑ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ❑ SUBMIT 12 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including folded site plans CASE #: DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ATLAS PAGE * ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: ZONING & LAND USE CLASSIFICATION OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: / SOUTH: ! O SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ 100.00 EAST: / FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Single Family (LDR or LNIDR only) Residential Infill Project (Revised 9/19101) — PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT— A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Section 4- 202.A) APPLICANT NAME: John Doran and Stephanie J. Doran MAILING ADDRESS: 65 Verbena Street CLEARWATER FL 33767 PHONE NUMBER: 727 - 447 -9579 FAX NUMBER: 727 - 443 -0163 CELLULAR NUMBER: 727 -641 -7515 PROPERTY OWNER(S): John Doran and Stephanie J Doran (Must include ALL owners) AGENT NAME: F Chris Hensler Avante-Garde Builders ders Tnc MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 416 C'T PARWATFR Pi 337c7 PHONE NUMBER: 442 -9640 ( cell 420 -0297) FAX NUMBER: 446 -3622 B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: STREET ADDRESS: 65 Verbena Street CLEARWATER FL 33767 r 1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 7 Block 29 PARCEL NUMBER: 05 29 15 54666 029 0070 i '( �J PARCEL SIZE: 7,667 sq ftr (acres, square feet) FNiCa & DE LEWr> 1 hIJ PROPOSED USE AND SIZE: single family residential (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): reduction in front setback from 25' to 12-07' fr,r garaw (include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO XX (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents 'I' C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Section 4- 202.A) ❑ SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE OR DEED TO THE PROPERTY D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 3- 913.A) ❑ Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. the housp = to ours and the one next to it both have aaraaeg facing Narcissus Avenue, and all five houses across the parkway on Bay Esplanade have garages facing Narcissus Avenue 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. G p reposed ;a age and drivewalwi11 hp next to the garage and driveway of the adjacent property, and our garage will physically and architecturally be an extension of our house 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. our proposed garage will allow us to store vehicles inside, instead of in the driveway 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. there will be no impact on traffic; it is simply a matter of where we will'store our vehicles 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. most houses in the vicinity have attached gara es 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, - on adjacent properties. the garage is to be architecturally an extension of our house, and compatible with other houses in the vicinity ❑ Provide complete responses to the seven (7) RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECT CRITERIA: 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity and development standards. to build a garage in the location proposed with the length necessary to park cars inside by physical necessity will reduce the setback from 25' Page 2 of 6 — Flexible Standard Development Application Single Family Residential Infill Project— City of Clearwater � t 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.) the development should increase the fair market value of abutting properties because it improves the fair market value of our property (estimated value before development $200,000; value after development $210,000) and because of the aesthetics of the developmen 3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. the property is and will continue to be a single family house; the improvement is an attached garage, permitted in the city of Clearwater 4. The uses or mix of use within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses. adjacent properties are all single family dwellings 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. most other houses in vicinity have attached garages; addition will allow us to store cars in garage instead of in driveway; the addition will be architecturally and physically an extension of the existing structure 6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. .;t- othc-_r houses in vicinity have attached garages; addition will allow us to store cars in garage instead of.in driveway; addition wi 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off - street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a wh Ig. the only exception to standards is the reduction in front setback, which is justified because it allows an attached garage, consistent wi-EF most other houses in the neighborhood, is architecturally consistent with the design of the existing structure and compatible with design and .layout or abutting property E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Design Criteria Manual and 4- 202.A.21) ❑ STORMWATER PLAN including the following requirements: Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; Proposed stormwater detention /retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; Stormwater calculations for attenuation and water quality; Signature of Florida registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations ❑ COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ❑ COPY OF STATE AND COUNTY STORMWATER SYSTEM TIE -IN PERMIT APPLICATIONS, if applicable Page 3 of 6 — Flexible Standard Development Application Single Family Residential Infill Project— City of Clearwater t F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 202.A) ❑ SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) — One original and 12 copies: ❑ COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; ❑ PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required; ❑ LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY. ❑ TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines.) ❑ GRADING PLAN, as applicable; G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 202.A) ❑ SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24"x 36 "): All dimensions; North arrow, Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; Location map; Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; Footprint and size of all buildings and structures; All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; _ Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights -of -way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; _ Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all refuse collection facilities and all required screening (min. 10'x12' clear space); Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm -water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. ❑ SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written /tabular form: Land area in square feet and acres; Number of dwelling units proposed; Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; Size and species of all landscape material; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. ❑ REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11) and color rendering if possible; ❑ FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One -foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist ", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees. Page 4 of 6 — Flexible Standard Development Application Single Family Residential Infill Project— City of Clearwater t H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 1102.A) ❑ LANDSCAPE PLAN: All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Proposed and required parking spaces; Existing trees on -site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including dripline; Location, size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and /or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes, ❑ REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11) (color rendering if possible); ❑ IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval); ❑ COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 202.A.23) Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residential Infill Project. ❑ BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS —all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials; ❑ REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS — four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 %X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if possible) as required. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3 -1806) ❑ Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ❑ Reduced signage proposal (8' /s X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4- 801.C) ❑ Include as required if proposed development will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip General Manual. Refer to Section 4 -801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. L. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the est of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to is n photo ph a property described in this application. 74 John Doran Signature of property owner or Stephanie J. Doran STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Sworn to and subscribed before me this 19th day of pp-hrnia3z A.D. 20Q_ to me and /or by who is personally known has produced as identification. 0-IM J �(� A I �(nl Nota pu hc, Charlene S. Smith y commission expires`�a Charlene S Smith * *My Commission CC779300 Expires October 19, 2002 Page 5 of 6 — Flexible Standard Development Application Single Family Residential Infill Project— City of Clearwater t M. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: (Names of all property owners) 1. That (I am /we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 65 Verbena Street CLEARWATER FL 33767 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) reduction in front setback from 25' to 12.07' for an attached garage 3. That the undersigned (has /have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: F. Chris Hensler as (his /their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City I representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 6. That (I/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and rre' Property Ow ,Rnhn Doran Property Own r Stephanie J. D( STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this 1 9th day of Phnia y, , 2002_ personally appeared JO o having been first duly sworn Deposes and says that he /she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he /she siahed, � 1% Charlene S Smith ? My Commission Expires: * *My Commission CC779300 ,.41 Expires October 19, 2002 S. SmiNlary . �� �w r oimo y c+r{�muncm wppncauon rorms%aevwopmenr review ismgre ramp vesraenbal innu application 2001.doc Page 6 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application Single Family Residential Infill Project- City of Clearwater 02/22/2002 13:22 ° ? k ater s 1 0 7275624576 CbW#AP t, Wi ft 33M TdopNorn: TV4M -4W1 FK T374 024M PLAN O SUBMIT ORWNAl SIQN9Q ANn NOTARM APPLICATION O SUBMIT 12 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION be Uft ft" Mb pbM o SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $12.Q 5 PAGE 03 CASE IP. DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff inM&I* ; ATLAS PAGE Ik ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CMIFICNTION: ,_,., , ZONING S LAND USE CLASSIFICATION OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: N�ORH: T r �..._�— i l�r� VVEST: EAST: FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION CaMprAnaiye bM Wavel omat PmJwt MeviW 11101) -VLV kM TYPE OR PRINT- so aeBrload dad m •may A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: ($*Won 4.20" APPLICANT! : Nguyen, Phuoc Thanh MAUNGADDRESS: 2223 Harn Blvd., Clearwater, FL 33764 64WL ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: 727-796-0622 FAX NUMBER: 727 - 446 -3741 PROPERryOWNER(S): Thanh Phuoc Nguyen and Kim -Truc Thi Nguyen 9" kmk* ALL away AGENTNAME(S): Patrick T Maguire, Esa MVULINGADDRESS: 1253 Park Street, Clearwater, FL 33756 E4 ML ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: 7 2 7- 4 4 2- R R R R ftwLL NUMBER: FAX NUMBER: 727-446-3741 S. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: 3006 Gulf -to -Bay Blvd. STREET ADDRESS d stb jaot ab: E 1101 C LUUL See Plan J L .GAL DESQRIPTION: `- pt W bbd bale, plNa nob DO boadm OF Mia dw Mrt In tln nId1�Q 9 PARCEL NUMBER: 1612 9/ 16 / 0 5 2 9 2/ 0 0 8/ 0 0 8 0 i PLAN, C)� "a' 'S : u ": t. 'te E 1' SV' ;S PARCEL BM 12348sq.ft. / 0.283 AC MOL Gana, WAa MO PROPOSED USE AND SML Restaurant (awm6ar of *008% W&, h AW ftwo ar opm bAmp of naneaaidwAid � DMRIPTION OF. REQUEST(S} Reduction of perimeter landscape Buffer area. reduction' of required par ing a lob"Vw�cc sp - c1°rec y oon d r T1*a6?°T B' estaurant us DOES, THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGKTB (TOR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO _,_,_ (If yes, MttAOh a copy of the APP&MM S doanwnb) P1pa 1 d 0 - Fiamb DwwtMW=1 AP0k&1 n - CQrP asralw M PA&A PmWt P1C)a01- CRp d QNrWdW e. 02/22/2002 13:22 7275624576 FMIFT-7 PAGE 04 C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Section 1 -02.A) a SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR MON AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSMP (acts pope) D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 3 -913A) O Provide oompbte M&Wwa to tln sox (e) GENERAL APPI.ICABUTY CRITERIA: 1. The pmpoeed dwsbpma+t d the ynd will to In harmony with the wale, tnrlc, efoveraga, denaky and char CW of adjacent Pr%*Os In VAridr It is loafed The ro ert is im roved with a structure, site im rovements, which were developed in accordance ^with —A a proYednseddeusei s consistent with Community DEvel. Code. Z TM proposed development will rrd hinder or discourses 10 appropriate deMalop rd nt and INa of adjacent land and but ftP or alpnllkant I kroak tt» value thMaof. Adjacent Properties are developed and in use, and a restaurant will no negatively impact adjoining properties as such use is consistent with code. s The proposed OevekMpment wN not adversely aAbat 1M heallh or $04 or Persons Melding Or waklnp in ale rleigl+borhood of the pupa nd A restaurant use with minimal flexible standards is appropriate to the neighborhood. s. The proposed de"kV, rMt is deelgned to mk)hn m trld k congap , 1 e drivewa connection is available, Gulf -to -Bay is a major-arterial and trip eneration should be insubstantial. 5. The praposed development Is conaMent with the oomrnunl y character Of the rnmedide vicinity of the parcel pmpoeed for dmlope+erK Tile— uge is c de consistent and consistent with the commercial corridor. Q The design of the Proposed d0veiopmsnt miniTING adverse of cu, ftkx q vlswl, ecoustk and olfactory and hours of Pperatioe ong4xampropsmss The buffering of the property by other landscaping an ea r nd patking r6que9ted will have a minimal impact on the Gu -go- ax corridor. .aLL aRID 1t� +-^ ^i'%+-nj n ijgA of arj3�ilnjng Y rn rt s arki ng aftPr nff i c hoLrs 1 being attempted. O Provide aompiefe Meponses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE WILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTCRITERIA (as e131)114a1)4k 1. The devdoPrrWA or redevelopment of the Farad proposed for develapnMSrMt Is otherwise Impraca al wilhout devledwa from ft use, i WOO and devNopment slandania. Size, location and access to property, along with existing improvements WD�J a reg ire some deviations from de- velopment standards. - 2. The devebpnam of the parcel Proposed for devekgxm os a eomprehenelve inN Madeveloprnent project or reakiendel hrN wood will not reduce ft fat market vekte of ebuWW pro"idee. (Include do e�dsft value a the sb and the proposed value of the silo with Mr Belfore M, 000.00. After cosmetic chanjes 400, 0G0.00 Page 2 of tl — Pwkft Devebpmerd Appl"lon - Comprehenalve InI1A Redevelopment "ad— Oty of Ckarw star and 02,1122/2002 13 :22 7275624576 PLAN PAGE 05 3. The um Mogn Ms wromherwft LOW Nftve4wnvvi Woied are otherwise PI 10 d In do Gb Of Ciaarwalar. Restautants permitted in "C" zoning, but not with arterial access, site limited to arterial access, 4. The On or MIX Of use **On Ma oomPrehenelve kW M Projed are va OfA°M Lard UM. Restaurant use, more desirable than prior "adult" use and compatible with surrounding uses. 5. Subole wles For drawp Tom or redevelopment of ft nwea or ruin d uaa wttldn the oonrprehenslve ka MdevebPrnsrn praja�t ate not Con , i a awllebb in the Cly dGeuwatar. Sole access to arterial reauires reauest for project /use even though other properties wihout arterial access exist. A- The dsvebprr�»rrl�of�tgha parod PrOP O W for dewioPmsnt u a tromprM'laneiw M11MI rad�abprnent praja�t MITI �pprade tlr to atO vb�flr for OM ie prroopS7t'y 5 �o ed use is the on-ly ecomically viable alternative. A cordinaly the property has remained vacant and shows neglect. A lesser use will only result in minimal upgrade. 7. The design of LM proposed comprehon0A Mll redeveW"W"d W"Od 08d" a forth and toction Mat a *mms lira cormunk chera no r of fire immadlats vkdnity of the parcel proposP d for dwebPrnent and the Ctq of Clearwater,as a whole.. _ , -___.. ..,,.4 ..�. .,.�.� '179:11 v i mna(--t the corrLmunity and city in rogwd to lotwidth, required setbacks, height and d the P rWng WOUVOW t V01018. 9. bsm to ID community ehaneW and 00 I vicinity of the psrcW proposed dsv*Wr+ertt 0. Adequsw off - ousel parking in the irnmed1w vidnity according to the shared perking FomwW In OMMon 14 of Aroft 3 will be evaYaple to avoid on-shi et parking In Ma Immediate vk * of Parcel proposed for dsysbpr+nerd on CtrPpt parking is not av ilab e in vicinity. 10. The design of of bulldklgs =nPO s All the TourMt Dletrkll or Dormtawn Dlevlat design Pul 1 1, in DMWM 5 of Arfide 3 (aa applrabla). Use seperals shave M ro=mewy. N/A Page 3 of a — Flexible asvelopmeM AppliMlon - C rnprehen*vs Inf 9 PsdevelWnent Project— City of Cbmw ster _.82A22/2002 13:22 7275624576 PLAIN PACE 86 L SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS; (Section 4 -W2.A) O SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including dimensions or property) — One w%OnW and 12 copies; 0 COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as appDabts; O PRELIMINARY PLAT, as rraqubsd; O U) CATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; O TREE suRVEY (I cWing siting iron on slis and w*dn 2V of 00 241 b9► gpww, safes (DBH 4' ar grem0W). end tocatbn, K&Wi g drip area and Wb *V beet to be rerrrored); O ORADWO PLAN, as appilicabb f. WM PLAN SU6MITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4492,A) O WM PLAN with fhs toNowirq Ytfonn dIon (not ta atroasd 2a' x ]a'); Norm enter. Ergtnewft bar wale (minknum sorb one ktdl swats 50 WL and data praparwsd; _ Location mW; Yldas cheat ra(omeft kWMdusl sheets Mcluded In peekepa; Footprint and ems of s1 EXISTING bulidinps and structures; Footprint and ems of all PROPOSED bUNdkge and ebUdUn a; Al requkad adbecks; AN sdslktg end proposed points of egress; AN requMad eight triarghe; i wokabon of ww1 omontoly unique area, Rush Me waterrouresb, watlbnda, tree meeaas, and 810 base, base, krduding desalptim and boftn of understory, ground oww vegetation and vridh% habbb. atc; Loodion of ON ptiak and prlvab eawms►rts; LocaRbn of all sliest rights•of -wen within and adinownt to the We: Location of costing public and private utaibss, Including fire hydrants, dorm and sanbsry sewer farce, rrtarthob and aR atrrtlons, gas and waist Nnas; AN parking spaces, drireweya, loading arsu and vehicular uss areas, including handkapped spaces; papiction by Nwding or croeshetchirg of aN required parking lot interior fandeaupsd areas; Location of d refuse coNedlon facilities and enclosures (minkmm 125d Cr clear space); Location of all lsrndscspe materiel; _ Location of d jLawictbnal lines 4aoent to welland , Location of all omits and orbits shmww rata management tidllgas; Location of all outdoor fighting fixtures; and Location of all sd&dng and proposed eldswoft 0 SITE DATA TABLE for sAstlng• required, and proposed development, in W MaWW form: Larva on in square fact and acres; Nunnbw of EXISTING d*W& units and PROPOSED dwe" units; Gross fbor arcs devoted w each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form wM the nut w of required specsa; Total paved arcs, including al paved padckg spaces and ditwmya. enwasssd in square feet and peroerOP d the paved vehicular eras; Bas and sped" of aN landscape material; OMcW records book and page numbers Of d endetktg u(alty eesenrertfy tllyilding and structure heights; bmpemteable surface ratio (I.SJL); aid Floor arcs ratio (FJLR.) for d nonresida dW uses . 0 REDUCED SITE PLAN to seals (a % X 11) and oobr rerderkng a possible 0 FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the foNoWng sdditlonai ktfamtatfon an des plait: One4oct contours or spot elevstlons on aft; ORehe elevatlons N required to miusts the proposed storrrnwatar rrtsnagernertt for ft penal; AN open apace solves; Location of ail earth or water mWInkg waft end earth ben. Lot Wm and buNdkp Ntms (dknensbrwM; 8treds and drives (dirnenetonsd); But" and &tnaabral setbacks (dWwwaioned); Structural overhangs; Tres Irrventory; prepared by a 'ce. d arborist , of all trees r DBH or greater, re%d ft size, canopy (drip ones) and owlition of such trace Pap 4 of 6 — P4xble Deveioprrtant Application - Comprelwsive InM Redavatopment Pmjed— City of Cf maw ti. 02/22/2002 13:22 7275624576 PLAN PAGE 07 G. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 1102.A) O LAfOSGA►PE PLAN: All atdsting lend Propolled atrud ums; Nam" of dndbrp strati ; Oralnsgt and retentlon area krdudtrtg awabt, skit ��� ,dsvadorts; DNkaWon and dWwsfons of W mqulmd psrknM'•► "it vmmlk t biongin; bW& and ourbktg: pelkastion and dkranslons of al Paridrtg arose Mteiudlntp pfopomw and required ps* tp GPM"; Etoatktp Inn on♦Ibs and irnmsdia" sdjSOerrt to the aMe, by spacia, ems and Womb na, Mtdudirt0 drtpf" (as hft@ted on !+squired v" aurvW; nle6ar1" ftk4 lnp bobruoal and Location, sto, desoflpdon, ce and quardltks of SA atdslirtp avid propoaad bndsaepe ommm names; b�dQNiinp, IINil�hln0 �fld ^., T7PW planting dolls Ix" a, ptni % Wuba Wid imulId Mm PWO MtdAM ktatructl0ll�, 60 MbOl rnsasures; irtterlon lartdsaapktp arm ttak&tad ardor shWed and labeled and kdrim bridOW411 GD"MRS, �� � OOfh � � per"atepe covered; Cowmns of a pronotn OW94ntm approval (e.g. oondkiors imposed by tm GWIVIU Ngl Dwratopmam Goew, hipatlon Wes O vWDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to crab (0 X X 11) (eobr rendering F PoaafDb) O It UMATION PLAN (nouked for Lwat Two Wild Thres "PUOdbrs) O COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM aPPION I mm. as apPOcable H. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Cisarwater Design Criteria Manual and 4.202.A.Z1) O STORMWATER PLAN including ft folkrwing nqukemsnta: _ EWo** topopm" adenrdno 501st bgorb as PnaPSrty WM; Propossd grading including OnWod floor abvStbns Of all sbudlwaa; As adjacent atreett and munlclpal storm systwm: Proposed stormwster dek9ftboNnatention area Including top of bank toe of abpe and out* OoMroi strtrceura; Stormwatar calculations for attenuation and w*W quua* N plena and celarlatbna Signshrt of Florida registarad Professional Eng pb O COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT MWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SVVFW D approval is required prior to l"wnce of City Building ink), If EPPMW O COPY OF STATE AND COUNTY STORMWATER SYSTEM TIE-IN PERMIT APPLICATIONS, 0 apPWAbla 1. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 20LA.23) Requkad in Ilea event the application Indudea a development whore design aLndards are in Issue (e.g. Tourist n+d Downtown Dlabiots) or • PWt of a Comprehensive InS Redevelopment Protect or a Residential Inrfill Pmjad. O VILMMINO ELEVATION DRAWINGS - 86 aid" of If INAdings Indudwp height dimensions, colors and ntalM" O REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - bur $kiss or buadktg *0 Coitus and matefbfs to sofa (0 % X 11) (blade and whb and color mm darkrp, If ponibls) as required J. SIGNAGE: (Section 4- 202A.16) • Comprehan" Sign Program aWication, se sWicobb (separate applicstlon and fat required) • Reduced slgnags proposal (0 K x 11) (colon, M submlWng Comprehensive Sign Program SpPnotion K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4- 202.A.13 and 4- 801.C) O include as required if proposed development wet dtgreda the eeoeptabie level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Cornprehensbe Plan. Trip gere a ion shall be basal on the most recent sditbn of the Inatttute of Transportation Engineer's Trip General Manual. Rear to Section 4401 C of the Cornmunky Dervelopment Code for exctptlons to this roquirenaM. Paps b of 0 — Raxbb Development Applk ion - Compraharaive WM fiedevdopmmnt Project— City of CIWW ter 02/22/2002 13:22 7275624576 L. 91GNATURE! N I, ft undersigned, sduwwkdge that atl reprssenteWons made in this applloa0on are trw and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorise Clly rsp►ssentatives to vlelt and photograph the property desclbod n this application. C-LIIL� y owner or mmserltative M. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: Thanh Phuoc Nguyen and Kim Truc Thi PAGE 08 STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINRIAS $ram to and subscriWd beta a me ft — day of A.D. 10 me andleF — u r' N who Is personally known hen produoRt ..�_ 1deRdllOdlOn. M nmlasion n p J611V z P QO MY COMMISSION E) IRES OF FV SEPT 302004 1. That (I smAve ors) the ownsr(s) and record ttde hotdar(s) of the following desorlbsd property (address or general location): Rlvrl 2. That this propnty comaltutes the property for which a request fora: (describe request) 3. That the undersigned (hsamova) appointed and (doseldo) appoint: Patrick T. Maguire, E s cr . as (hisMsir) agent(s) to sxm to any petitions or order dOPX*nts necessary 10 affed such petition; 3. Thet this affidavt has been arteWW to Induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on to above described property; a. That the applicant s Mowledges that all Impact fees (parka and recreation, traft, stc.) will be paid PRIOR to the Issuance of a buldhrg parmd, conilk" of occupancy, or other mechanism, whichever occurs first; 5. That silt visks to the property are necessary by City representarves In order to procass this application and the owner sulhortaae Clay representatives to wish and photograph the properly described in this application; 6. That (Ilws), the undersigned aut1wity, hereby osrtky that the fbrspoi, Is true and ooneCt / STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Before no the undwaigned, an of floor duly commissioned by the laws of the Sute of Florida, on this 25th day of FPhrii a r no appeared Th who having been fist duly srwm Deposes and says that hdshs I AN avk that hshhs sipr�d. my 0�P � JEWELRHEINSMRH COITIfnI0ii0n 4� x COMMISSION NUMBER CC9W10 t Notary Public MY COMMISSM 9XINAM - S1Flmning DsWmanrlAppknfj n Fwmsldav&Wm*W mvfswtcwnprarrensma,WX sppiYea jw2.aba Page 6 of 6 — Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Fbdsvelopmant Project— City of Clearwater Albee, Rick From: Fierce, Lisa Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 10:23 AM To: Albee, Rick Cc: Tarapani, Cyndi; Parry, Mark Subject: RE: Mr. Ngyuen thanks Lisa L. Fierce Assistant Planning Director City of Clearwater - Planning Department Ifierce @clearwater -fl.com 727.562.4561 phone 727.562.4865 fax - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Albee, Rick Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 9:56 AM To: Fierce, Lisa Cc: Tarapani, Cyndi Subject: Mr. Ngyuen Lisa, as requested, I have re- assessed the trees at 3006 Gulf to Bay. It is my opinion that none of the trees have declined any further since my last assessment. All of the trees are of an average to above average condition. If you need any further information please do not hesitate to ask. Rick Albee Land Resource Specialist 562 -4741 Albee, Rick From: Fierce, Lisa Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 12:19 PM To: Albee, Rick Subject: FW: Mr. Ngyuen let's talk about this next week Lisa L. Fierce Assistant Planning Director City of Clearwater - Planning Department Ifierce @clearwater -fl.com 727.562.4561 phone 727.562.4865 fax - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Tarapani, Cyndi Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 12:06 PM To: Fierce, Lisa Subject: Mr. Ngyuen Please check with me re one tree that Nguyen says is dying -I will show it to you on the plan -get Rick to tell you what he told them -may not happen right away due to his absence. thank.s Cyndi Tarapani Planning Director (727)562 -4547 ctarapan@cleai-water-fl.com V l 1 Y Ur UL.LAK W A 1 LK APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL ki:,k Vi PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION ` MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENU 2nd FLO Q PHONE (727) -562 -4567 FAX (727) 562 -4576 AP- This form must be submitted for all applications for residential uses, accessory uses, nonresidential uses, fences. Signs, vested rights, development agreements, seawalls, docks, marinas and other marine structures and home occupations. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER, AND AGENT INFORMATION: \ -� APPLICANT NAME M iCuOEL 1 — L. N -I Y(t= MAILING ADDRESS I i �?►u R tl t�� L N lJ Lei "v �- �� Ll (Al PHONE NUMBER C ? ) t I FAX NUMBER PROPERTY OWNERS Tu A -t) ti- J rr, T V (List all owners) ("'1 AGENT NAME MAILING ADDRESS r =i'j r'/ , t- L-1 1 i PHONE NUMBER r d l �1 I r� I; —(.(I. Z)-5, FAX NUMBER PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: STREET ADDRESS: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Y PARCEL NUMBER: -') Yo OL ��•,�_ -,;;� Jr�r-�� I '-/ NNS I VIC ELOPFrtEN ; CITY OF CLEARWATER A,,. d �)�A� �.,+, nN )ILLS (let Ylf Lf r O N t PROPOSED USE AND SIZE: t (• t-1 f C L,,) 2t, (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) SIZE OF SITE: i r... I ZtY t <I .� il�'it r,,� .�(q '� Sr. �r -7 DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: N I61 I-t. LI) A' =L DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS? YES _ NO 2< '�'�� I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. lL i C Signa. re of l5roperty owner or representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINEL�AS Swom to and subscribed before me this "7 t'_ day of Lyc A.D., 19 -a- tx x , �-me nanor by 1 -huu)l� !� c -,�� t, n who Is pe C� known has produced �:! ,1 as I iderltifi tion. --k) Notary public, PATRICIA R REEDER � my commission expires: NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF FLORIDA C>\iNSLSSION NO. CC -58065 FOR PLANNING OFFICE USE ONLY: // //�' LAND USE DISTRICT OF PARCEL: ZONING: FUTURE DESIGNATION: V l ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF ADJACENT PARCELS: NORTH: G SOUTH: (Z, EAST: WEST: G FUTURE LAND USE CLASSIFICATION OF ADJACENT PARCELS: NORTH: C, �, qftff QST WEST .1)9, A 1 jf No.SCx� - QV epl 1 -tqo -� U V ul S�`N, 0 9 Q 9�ATEP�E�� CITY OF CLEARWATER - PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TREE REMOVAL PERMIT NAME OF OWNER HAM H P. mcov c /J OWNER'S ADDRESS 2-2-2- 3 -14A 6l J 04-A - f ee. : i--c 3 j 2,64 PHONE C72,7 71 d,- y 62 ?_ 62 Gqx_- G SITE ADDRESS 3 d E 6, Q L E 70 P A LOCATION OF TREE(S) ON LOT I ��� E �� � '' +2_w_ " 5u;- o, wj_ a� r SPECIES AND NUMBER OF TREE(S) 3 OA V TO APPLICANT: A non- refundable fee of $15.00 for up to five trees to be removed, plus $3.00 for every tree above 5 to be removed is required. NO.. t PCA REASON FOR REMOVAL: ❑ Construction • Permit # -See "A" below Hazardous Declining a Dead ❑ Other (Specify) Fee Rec'd. $ l� Receipt #� A) CONSTRUCTION Date _(2A �- 1. For new construction, additions or other modifications of a property which involve the removal of a protected tree(s), a site plan is required. This site plan must have a minimum scale of 1 " =20' for single family lots, or 1 " =50' for all others. The site plan must include: a. Major Changes of Grade f. Proposed Number of Parking Spaces j. All Protected Trees Including: b. Structure Locations g. Proposed Underground Utilities (I.) Diameter of 4.5' above grade (DBH) c, Driveways and Walks h, Zoning Setbacks (ii.) Surveyed Location }3 Parking Arrangement I. All easements and Rights -of -Way (iii.) Species e Required Number of Parking Spaces (!v.) Diseased or Insect Infested Trees , k; Tree Barricade Detail & Locations 2. Protective barriers are required around all trees remaining on site during construction. These barricades must remain intact during construction. The barriers must meet City Specifications. B) REPLACEMENTS 1. Tree replacement minimum standards: 12' overall height, 4" caliper, Florida Grade #1. See inspectors note below to determine the number of replacement trees required. Replacements required within 30 days. I hereby certify that as property owner or as representative of the property owner, I have verified that the tree(s) sought to be removed is wholly on property owned by the above - identified property owner, and should it be determined that `(! the tree(s) are located wholly or partially on property owned by some other person, then, I agree to hold the City of Clearwater harmless in any claim made for wrongful removal of such tree(s). I hereby certify that this application together with any plans submitted is a true representation of all facts concerning the proposed removal of the tree(s). Any deviation from the perm! 'ssued shall, ender it null and void and be considered a violation of the Community Development Code. t-jc Gf ` fir-% , f0- Si Nature of owner or applicant Printed Name Z2Z 5 'HA-.Q-,-j ✓�D Address Agency Representing (If Not Owner) e� �►'� W?6 2-:4 City State Zip Phone Fax DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - Not Valid Until Signed By City Manaaer or his Designated Anent Inspector's Comments: Required Replacement Trees: Applicable Code Section: Based on the Inspector's comments and information submitted, the above removal application is El Approved as Su mitted ❑ Approved- Modified as Noted Above Denied At 7 s Signed: V.", �,_ -- Date: f ,' Communit, Development Coordinator or Designee /Inspector 1362.0001 -GC j White - Planning & Development Services Yellow - Applicant Rev. 11-00 lj LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW HOUSING DIVISION NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES March 30, 2001 Mr. Thanh Nguyen 2223 Ham Boulevard Clearwater, Florida 33764 ITY OF C LEARWAT ER PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758 -4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562 -4567 FAx (727) 562 -4576 RE: Request for Tree Removal Permit (MIS 2001 - 00139) for site at 3006 Gulf to Bay Boulevard Dear Mr. Nguyen: The purpose of this letter is to inform you of the circumstances under which a tree removal permit may be issued within the City of Clearwater. As provided in Section 4 -1201 of the Community Development Code, "...no permit shall be granted unless it is part of a level one or level two approval and unless it is determined that the application complies with the criteria of Section 3- 1205." This means a site plan needs to be submitted for a specific use of the property before the City will consider issuing a tree removal permit. The use of the property must be permitted in the zoning district and the required development standards (parking, landscaping, etc.) must be met. In your case, a site plan needs to accompany your tree removal request. Please indicate the intended use and show how all of the standards within the C, Commercial District will be met. When your site plan has been submitted, your tree removal request will be reviewed against the criteria setforth in Section 3 -1205 B of the Code. They include determining the following specifics about the tree(s) in question: existence of specimen or historic trees, the condition and location of tree(s), possibility of relocating tree(s), and potential to preserve such tree(s). Included herein is the tree removal permit you submitted which is rendered denied. You may reapply as indicated above. Copies of the applicable Code sections are attached for your convenience. If you have comments or questions, please contact me at 727.562.4561. Sincerely, � bLia L. Fierce Development Review Manager Attachments as noted CC: Rick Albee, Land Resource Specialist SAPlanning Department\Planning - Dev Review\n uyen tree removal permit letter. doc.doc WRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR- CONINIISS10l4ER J.B. JOHNSON, VICE MAYOR- COMMISSIONER BOB CLARK, COMMISSIONER ED HART, COMMISSIONER F. DAVID HEMERICK, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL, EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRRIATIVF. ACTION Ei \ ,IPLOYER" EGEND: LOT .� ( LOT . 4 i LOTS ' LOT A. IR OUND ?� :: c �t g ..� 3• FIR314'&CAP fW.RIGHTOFWAY - L- CEJ1TSRiM F 112" N 9aoq•o E 6' G'BdIN Id11rl z;:.: t L8k2129FLSit3247 1S, FNDIfCUT, s126.00 �i ItPROPERTYLIIJE v 126.14' FZNCd C WAiL ) p R. =OFFICALRECARDS .. c g=1JCENSED BUS&J= r� ALLEY FIR 72- SO y 2 6 3A' � y�t� 4T (P) 27 LS= PROFFESIONALLICENSIDSURVEYOR --''� - �ryl 5 6 A1� "" Ci —III 42AS (Fj yn FrIRE HY R a PLAT/pL v A _ ;. to T �, _ a i _ _ - -W= SIDEWALK F [� ONC. =CONCRETE FIR I" =F IELD ') =PLAT Jl� ;Y DOT =FLA. DEPT. OFTRANSMATA77ON 6' C8L17 Lnvx 72 at1!� ' �; 4r CaLur L I FINCB • 1►3NCa' �. ��,._ .� -� BLOCK 8 L2,33U.2` SQUARE. Fr. cla �- x t 28 ACRES Cl �. �� to 1 L 9 I LOT 8 f 1� ;URVEYOR.SNOTES: c �. ( 1 LOT 7 I 1.) ALL LEGALDESCRIPTTONSSOPPLIIDBlCLIDYl �/ . Ac.NVC., ' RQw 2.) NO ANGLES ORBEARINGSSHOWNONPLAT 5.6 1-`16 'j j a STALL 47 _ _ _ clql I Q� 3.) BASIS OF BEARING LS SHOWN { ' 9 ;�r O b ^I I.) NO UNDERGROUND UTIIITIESLOCATFD - j •_:: _ :16 OR SHOWN / _ .. ` 5.) PARKING AREAS SHOWN APPRO.UNA FLY ONLY ( y {1 vi !y FIR I" Flo CAP FDOT ,k ^ POS25 ." • 1j t . 1Q8' 41 BS CALC y W ddSlfl[31VT FIR 3/4" fi, k. . GisMETFR, L 4.2 40.7' 3 r;: OB 6pY6,PLCa Y06 s.ti'k— Kt BASIS OFBEARaNC 'f' ( r ten. 126.14 ° e �, •Y, 1 6' S%W o �as e < z' 6.5 S/W " ' �• a *t�' aroxaiaaE 1 PLAT Aw 20' 4a 60' _ Rd's' GULF TO BAY: -BLV D./S.R. 60 (PLAT - CLEVELAND) ZTIFTED TO: TYPEOFSURVEY CADFIZE JOB NO. FIELD WORK DATE CREW CHIEF DRAWN BY WJT REV_ /I BOUNDARY ZITECFI�WORlC� 1605 312/00 i DRS CK'D BY DRS REV ,�2 PER F.I.R. CITY OF CLEARWATER BAY REwsE° DATE 3/6/00 REV3 This certifies that a survey of . the NOAATrEt�rB OM �OT=R CH 4 ry3v der my supe 'on and that the TIWSL MVEYDOESNOTREFLECTORDF1F1u�OWtr� %MI NOT VALID UNLESS SIGN6 a47ED AND STAMPED WITH EMBOSSED SEAL survey meets the- minimum technic standards set forth by the florido 3AL DESCRJP770N. U9 of Professional Land Surveyors in j �( ]�% PREPAREDB�jY�% 1617 -6, Rorido Administrative Cc TS 8, 9,10, ALSO THE SOUTH 12 OF VACATED ALLEY TO THE NORTH )3LOCK 8, BAY VIEW SUBDlWSIONIIS ` l N ll! r D S URVl� l ORS INC. l l r pursuant to Section 472027, Rori )CORDED INPLATBOOK9, PAGE 43OFTAEPUBUCRECORDSOFPINELI .ASCOUNTYF�RLDA. . 1 Statutes. And, that the sketch he 1939 SUNSET POEUROAD true n accurate representation t - to th b- dge and IB7ECTTO I0'FOOT WIDE RIGRT OFWAYEASEM0ffRECORDED INOR BOO %5925, PAGE 1205. CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33765 bje t to not d no ns sh PHONE (727) 462 -9906 FAX (727) 462 -9710 "' Y `• EMAIL:iniandl@gte.net R SILWE, B N aj l"lo� TEA�voQ } CITY OF CLEARWATER - PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TREE REMOVAL PERMIT NAME OF OWNER AM) . A16 1) `d C' �) . 9, VH A ],11-1 OWNER'S ADDRESS ?_' 2 3 +-160­0 13 76d-f PHONE L71,7) -71.1*- 062-?_ SITE ADDRESS �t�or� t "i �! �� �.� . C A . LOCATION OF TREES) ON L O T H ) \ X S i t 1 ) A 1 0 I I I R)gQ_; 9 SPECIES AND NUMBER OF TREE(S) 6 TO "APPLICANT: A non - refundable fee of $15.00 for up to five trees to be removed, plus $3.00 for every tree above 5 to be removed is required. NO., REASON FOR REMOVAL: ❑ Construction • Permit # -See "A" below ❑ Hazardous Declining Dead ID(Other (Specify) Fee Recd. $ '"' VI Receipt # a A) CONSTRUCTION Date _�_ e�2 1. For new construction, additions or other modifications of a property which involve the removal of a protected tree(s), a site plan is required. This site plan must have a minimum scale of 1 " =20' for single family lots, or 1 " =50' for all others. The site plan must include: " a. Major Changes of Grade f. Proposed Number of Parking Spaces j. All Protected Trees Including: b. Structure Locations g. Proposed Underground Utilities 0.) Diameter of 43 above grade (DBH) c, Driveways and Walks h. Zoning Setbacks (ii.) Surveyed Location d. Parking Arrangement I. All easements and Rights -of -Way (iii.) Species Required Number of Parking Spaces (iv.) Diseased or Insect Infested Trees k. Tree Barricade Detail & Locations 2. Protective barriers are required around all trees remaining on site during construction, These barricades must remain / intact during construction. The barriers must meet City Specifications. REPLACEMENTS �1. Tree replacement minimum standards: 12' overall height, 4" caliper, Florida Grade #1. See inspectors note below to determine the number of replacement trees required. Replacements required within 30 days. I hereby certify that as property owner or as representative of the property owner, I have verified that the tree(s) sought to be removed is wholly on property owned by the above - identified property owner, and should it be determined that the tree(s) are located wholly or partially on property owned by some other person, then, I agree to hold the City of Clearwater harmless in any claim made for wrongful removal of such tree(s). I hereby certify that this application together with any plans submitted is a true representation of all facts concerning the proposed removal of the tree(s). Any deviation from the permit i ued shall r nder it null and void and be considered a violation of the Community Development Code. - 'FH^144 Sig atu a of owner or applicant Printed Name Address City State Zip DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS VNE - Not Valid Inspector's Comments: Required Replacement Trees: Applicable Code Section: Agency Representing (If Not Owner) Phone 7 q 6 -- () 62 Z_ Fax J By City Manager or his t T Based on the Inspector's comments and information submitted, the above removal application is: 0 Approved as Sub fitted ❑ Approved- Modified as Noted Above Denied Signed: 4 ;.. r...) "+> ;; ' i� _� X' - _. - . - ..aw Date: Community Development Coordinator or Designee /Inspector 1362.0001 -GC White - Planning & Development Services Yellow - Applicant Rev. 11 -00 Address City State Zip DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS VNE - Not Valid Inspector's Comments: Required Replacement Trees: Applicable Code Section: Agency Representing (If Not Owner) Phone 7 q 6 -- () 62 Z_ Fax J By City Manager or his t T Based on the Inspector's comments and information submitted, the above removal application is: 0 Approved as Sub fitted ❑ Approved- Modified as Noted Above Denied Signed: 4 ;.. r...) "+> ;; ' i� _� X' - _. - . - ..aw Date: Community Development Coordinator or Designee /Inspector 1362.0001 -GC White - Planning & Development Services Yellow - Applicant Rev. 11 -00 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW HOUSING DMSION NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES May 2, 2001 Mr. Thanh Nguyen 2223 Ham Boulevard Clearwater, Florida 33764 COPY 8` y O� CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758 -4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562 -4567 FAX (727) 562 -4576 RE: Request for Tree Removal Permit (MIS 2001 - 00282) with revised site plan for site at 3006 Gulf to Bay Boulevard Dear Mr. Nguyen: Your. site plan submitted on April 25, 2001 in association with a tree removal permit cannot be approved. As provided in Section 4 -202 of the Community Development Code, "...no application shall be accepted during the following time periods after the denial of a substantially similar application affecting the same property or any portion thereof: a) nine months for Level Two approvals." In your case, the site plan you recently submitted is substantially the same as that which was denied by the Community Development Board on March 20, 2001 for a night club use. If you decide to change the use to some other use permitted within the Commercial District, you will need to submit a revised site plan that complies with the Community Development Code in terms of lot area, lot width, parking spaces, landscaping, etc. This means a site plan needs to be submitted for a specific use of the property before the City will consider issuing a tree removal permit. Again, a site plan needs to accompany your tree removal request. Please indicate the intended use and show how all of the standards within the Commercial District will be met. Furthermore, a less intensive use would require less parking and the request to remove trees may no longer be necessary. When your site plan has been submitted, your tree removal request will be reviewed against the criteria setforth in Section 3 -1205 B of the Code. They include determining the following specifics about the tree(s) in question: existence of specimen or historic trees, the condition and location of tree(s), possibility of relocating tree(s), and potential to preserve such tree(s). Included herein is the tree removal permit you submitted which is rendered denied. You may reapply as indicated above. Copies of the applicable Code sections are attached for your convenience. BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR- COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER How HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER ED HART, COMMISSIONER BILL JONSON, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" M•' `Nguyen May 2, 2001 — Page 2 you have comments or questions, please contact me at 727.562.4561. L. Development Review Manager Attachments as noted CC: Rick Albee, Land Resource Specialist ►�` \\MS2\PDS\Planning Department \C D B\FLEX \Innactive or Finished Applications \Gulf to Bay 3006 Cheerleaders - Denied \letter nguyen tree removal permit 5.2.01.doc I- 4-202 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE ment coordinator shall notify the appli- cant of the reasons that the application is legally insufficient, that the application is deemed withdrawn and no further devel- opment review shall be conducted until the application is resubmitted. D. Review by development review committee. after an application for development approval is ietermined to be complete and legally sufficient, be development review committee shall review :he application in accordance with Division 3 of his Article if a level one approval, Division 4 if a evel two approval and Division 6 if a level three ipproval. E. Issuance of development order. The commu- iity development coordinator shall issue a devel- )pment order for Level One (flexible standard) ipproval. F. Fees. Except for those applications submit- ted on behalf of governmental agencies, all apph- :ations for development approval shall be accom- :anied by the payment of a fee established from time -to -time by the city commission and main - ;ained as Appendix A to the City Code. G. Resubmission of application affecting same erty. 1. No application shall be accepted during the following time periods after the denial of a substantially similar application af- fecting the same property or any portion thereof: a. Nine months for level two approvals. b. Twelve months for level three approv- als. 2. The time periods specified in this subsec- tion shall be deemed to have commenced only after the completion of any adminis- trative or judicial review which may have been sought. ,Ord. No. 6526 -00, § 1, 6- 15 -00) Section 4 -203. Building permit. A. Permit required. No person shall commence any construc- tion, demolition, modification or renova- tion of a building or structure without first obtaining a building permit. 2. No seawall, bulkhead, groin, marine im- provement, bridge or other similar ma- rine structure shall be built within the city until the building official has issued a building permit for such work. 3. Abuilding permit shall authorize only the use, arrangement and/or construction de- scribed in level one and two approvals and no other use, arrangement or construc- tion. 4. Complete engineering and architectural plans for each component of a develop- ment project shall be required to be sub- mitted prior to the issuance of a building permit. For any phased project, such plans shall be required for each phase of the development. B. Procedure: All applications for building per- mits shall be submitted in a form required by this Development Code and the building official. Upon receipt of an application, including a declaration of unity of title, in accordance with Article 4 Division 16, the building official shall forward a copy to the community development coordinator in order to determine whether the application conforms to an approved level one or level two approval. Upon receipt of the determination of the community development coordinator, the building official shall determine whether the application conforms to all applicable requirements contained in the building code. If the building official deter- mines that the application does conform, the building permit shall be issued. If the building official determines that the application does not conform, he shall identify the application's defi- ciencies and deny the application. C. Appeal: A denial of a building permit may be appealed in the manner provided in Article 4 Division 5. (Ord. No. 6526 -00, § 1, 6- 15 -00) Section 4 -204. Occupancy permit. Supp. No. 1 CD4:10 A. Applicability. 1. A certificate of occupancy shall be re- quired for the following: a. Occupancy and use of land or a build- ing hereafter improved, erected, struc- turally altered, reconstructed, en- larged or moved. LEGEND: FIR =FOUND IROiV ROD RIW =RIGHT OF WAY CL= CENTERLINE PL= PROPERTYLINE OR.= OFFICAL RECORDS LB= LICENSED BUSINESS PLS =PROFFESIONAL LICENSED SURVEYOR (CALC)= CAL.CULA.TFD FHA =FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLE SIW= SIDEWALK CONC.= CONCRETE (F) =FIELD (P) =PLAT FDOT =FLA. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION SURVEYORS NOTES: a 1.) ALL LEGAL. DESCRIPTIONS SUPPLIED BY CLLENr 2.)-NO ANGLES OR BEARINGS SHOWN ON PLAT 3.) BASIS OF BEARflVG IS SHOWN 4.) NO UNDERGROUND UTHMES LOCATED OR SHOWN 5.) PARKING AREAS SHOWN APPROXIMATELY ONLY f I SEC77ON16, TOWNSHIP29S., RANVGEME. LOT 3 + LOT 4 i LOT 5 LOT 6 i i t PLAT /PL L ! _ I FIR 314" & CAP FIR 112" .t N 94°00'0 E 6' CHAIN Lnff FND XCUT -T LB #2129,PLS #3247 02, 1` E 1.5' \ 12b. 126.00 9, / Fa1YCa �° WALL TEDD) �I CL , ALLEY 8 ...... _ i FIR 112" I S� �+ �� �— 7 .` 3.4' _.._ �-4 A �,c 2T .... '✓"� 42.05' 2T Bi PLAT /PL ( y 10 — 1 FIR 1 6' CHAIN LINE PENCE to- R/Y aesa�Nr OR 59ZS,PdGa 1205 FHA z5 i I 72' = 6' CHIN LINE ' _ _� FBNCE ! W 12,330.2' SQUARE FI'. i m BLOCK 8 28 ACRES _ = 11 _ _ _ _ _ (CALC) l $ 4i LQ�'`-9 _ LOT 8 > 0 = f LOT 7 ?5.6' -- .............._ _ NC_ - _ LS3'AIL 1. 'I .47' = - 1 Q4 - " g / {oh 14.5. =_ f O� �� 1' i C 33 C6 00 CI ii. FIR 1" iK HA A w. CAP FDOT \ i STSai 42' (P) P " SIGN POSTS • 3 'CALE 41.85 ...�. .-- m..� ""�. 1; t A 10.8. CALL _ FIR 314_ . ' 6 i GAS METER o 8.8 BASIS OF BEARING E` 40.7' I .. i P El l� _ U- 1.8 1L; fC� .5 ;. 126.14 ( e 4' tI }�1`"'° - i .e..6 S%W o ?�aveR . a : 6.5 S /W'� " .' : �. A T�`� -0 -e�rai s1� ? FPT� ?1�� t 01 �, i 1 Z0' 40` 60' '- 3 R � 2 �f1L GULF TO BAY- BLVRIS.R. 60 (PLAT - CLEVELAND �- 1'=GU CERTIFLED TO: Cfl Y OF CLEARWATER survey meets the minimum technical standards set forth ov 'the -7orida Board LEGAL DESCRIPTION. of Professionai Land Surveyors in Chapter PREPARED BY 61G17 -6, Florida Administrative Code, I VLAND SURVEYORS INC. Pursuant ro d, tiara the sketch Florida hre LOTS 8, 9, 10, ALSO THE SOUTH 112 OF T•ACATF.D ALLEY TO THE NORTH BLOCK 8, BAY VIER, SUBDT47SIOR % {1S RECORDED ITV PL47' BOOK 9, PAGE 43 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF P(NELLAS COL'1'TY,FLORIDA. l I Statutes. And, that the sketch hereon is true and accurate representation thereof 1939 SUNSET POINT ROAD to the t of my knowled d belief. CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33765 bject is otes and ations s wn SUBJECT TO IG' FOOT RIDE RIGh'T OF DVAYFASE'4fEN'T RECORDED IN 0, R. BOOK 5925, PAGE 12 05, PHONE (727) 462 -9906 FAX (727) 462 -9710 ohe 4n. EMAIL: inlandl @a gte.net ' ,11E, P. L. 175 LB NO. 5 7 nTE OF SL7ZVFY C- ID FILE JOB NO FIELD WORK DATE CREW CHIEF � DRAWN BY WJT REV. # 1 PER F.I.R. REVISED BOUNDARY zATECH�Wow 1605 312100 DRS CK'D Br. DRS REV #2 BAY DATE: 316100 REV # 3 This certifies that a survey of the property described hereon was made under my supervision, and that the SUBJECTTO SETBACKS , F- ISMWEVISAAVRE5MCTTO14SOF RECORD . NOATTE . PTBY77ffsOFFrcE1NTOTrrr�RFSEARGY. 77 IU55 RVEYDOESNOT RE=' II OR DETE— N i- OWNM,7yLr, NOT VALID UNL ESS SIGNED DATED AND 574MPED W17-Li E-l4BOSSEO SF-1L survey meets the minimum technical standards set forth ov 'the -7orida Board LEGAL DESCRIPTION. of Professionai Land Surveyors in Chapter PREPARED BY 61G17 -6, Florida Administrative Code, I VLAND SURVEYORS INC. Pursuant ro d, tiara the sketch Florida hre LOTS 8, 9, 10, ALSO THE SOUTH 112 OF T•ACATF.D ALLEY TO THE NORTH BLOCK 8, BAY VIER, SUBDT47SIOR % {1S RECORDED ITV PL47' BOOK 9, PAGE 43 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF P(NELLAS COL'1'TY,FLORIDA. l I Statutes. And, that the sketch hereon is true and accurate representation thereof 1939 SUNSET POINT ROAD to the t of my knowled d belief. CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33765 bject is otes and ations s wn SUBJECT TO IG' FOOT RIDE RIGh'T OF DVAYFASE'4fEN'T RECORDED IN 0, R. BOOK 5925, PAGE 12 05, PHONE (727) 462 -9906 FAX (727) 462 -9710 ohe 4n. EMAIL: inlandl @a gte.net ' ,11E, P. L. 175 LB NO. 5 7 .;tf� �ik kz;r-. 7-- " -4�44� �.� 41 <-I "7N. - Ao" er ezocle t %,,,eF 6zock- - INDIA HAWTHORN 18"-24"; 28" OA x 00 6' CHAIN Ll N K FENCE x SITE CD V) NEW (e7 v TURF BLOCK x TO MATCH m 0 c (Typ.) LAND USE:- COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL USAGE: ADULT USE NIGHT CLUB - -- 0- 12,3 S.F. 12,348 S.F. a m v c" > c 2,132 S.F. 2,132 S.F. 4 (S.F. & % OF GROSS SITE) 17.43% c- - -- CD 2,040 S.F. - INDIA HAWTHORN 18"-24"; 28" OA x 00 6' CHAIN Ll N K FENCE x 0 x m LLJ 'b :5 CTI m u CD C> SITE CD NEW EXISTING (E) TURF BLOCK x TO MATCH m EXISTING c (Typ.) LAND USE:- 0 x m LLJ 'b :5 CTI m u CD C> SITE CD CNJ EXISTING (E) PROPOSED (P) REQUIRED m C c C LAND USE:- COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL USAGE: ADULT USE NIGHT CLUB - -- 0- 12,3 S.F. 12,348 S.F. a m 0.28 AC c" 10,000 S.F.(MIN.) c 2,132 S.F. 2,132 S.F. 4 (S.F. & % OF GROSS SITE) 17.43% c- - -- CD 2,040 S.F. --17.4,3% 2,040 S.F. F.A.R.: 0.17 0.17 0.40 (MAX.) FRONT: 3.6' 3.6. 0- SETBACKS: SIDE: 10.81 EX I STORY MASONRY BLDG. m N III jlr�l KRHMXW OO�g M. 01­11IV51012 fiffRulk"T mg ille-wifaml ELA DI ta (J, kg I 0 42' (P) 41.85' (CALIC) GAS METER N )OLE -0- POW%(::T\ c� C�6 x �D m x :D u xx �x 0 ZONE X PER FLOOD INSURANCE RATE" MAP 125096 0018 D MAP REVISED: 08/19/91 IiIe mll'i SITE DATA EXISTING (E) PROPOSED (P) REQUIRED ZONING: C c C LAND USE:- COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL USAGE: ADULT USE NIGHT CLUB - -- 12,3 S.F. 12,348 S.F. a LOT AREA: 0.28 AC 0.28 AC 10,000 S.F.(MIN.) BUILDING COVERAGE: 2,132 S.F. 2,132 S.F. 4 (S.F. & % OF GROSS SITE) 17.43% 0 - -- GROSS FLOOR AREA (S.F.): 2,040 S.F. --17.4,3% 2,040 S.F. F.A.R.: 0.17 0.17 0.40 (MAX.) FRONT: 3.6' 3.6. 25' SETBACKS: SIDE: 10.81 10.81 lo, REAR: 47' 47' 20' 0 HEIGHT: 14' 14' 25' MAX. PAVED VEHICULAR USE AREA: lea (V.U.A.) 6,810 S.F. 6,951 S.F. --- IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RATIO: 9,842 S.F. 9,083 S.F. (I.S.R.) 0.797 0.736 0.80 (MAX.) OPEN SPACE: - 2,506 S.F. 3,265 S.F. (S.F. & % OF GROSS SITE) 20.3% 26.4% 20% PARKING LOT INTERIOR LANDSCAPING: 791 S.F. 1,216 S.F. (S.F. & X OF V.U.A.) 11.6% 17.5% 10% PARKING: v a Q L& 18 18 20 PARKING CALCULATIONS: 10 SPACES PER 1,000 S.F. OF GFA Lu X �- 2,040 S.F. OF GFA : 1,000 x 5 =20.4 = 20 SPACES ZONE X PER FLOOD INSURANCE RATE" MAP 125096 0018 D MAP REVISED: 08/19/91 IiIe mll'i Z 0 00 •ov z 0 0*4 wk a 4 x 4 0 W. x co m vt Z w z ma V z 0 Z lea Lu 0 Lk z 7. cl CL Lu x 0 CA v a Q L& LU � J Lu X �- 0 > UA 0 a m IV ZONE X PER FLOOD INSURANCE RATE" MAP 125096 0018 D MAP REVISED: 08/19/91 IiIe mll'i I I IoLl 0 LIGUSTRUM - 24" HIGH, 30" O.C. �D 00 PETITE PINK OLEANDER 2871 -30"; 36" O.C. LARGE-LEAFED PHILODENDRON 5 GAL; 30 O.C. - INDIA HAWTHORN RED PENTUS 1 GAL.28" O.C. A %FA, 126.00: (p) 126.14 (F) :> A c_- 3 �4 x R) x r X , ol� A x, Jrt AIN V mulu x -,e _T LL 36 n. s. UJ mwm 0 U UJ 0 > `5' i 0 -IF- F (S.F. X OF GROSS SITE) 20.3% 26.4% 1 20% (MIN.) PARKING LOT INTERIOR LANDSCAPING,� 791 S.F. 1,216 S.F. X DESIGN /DEVELOP MENT (S.F. & X OF V.U.A.) 11.6% 17.5% 10% ❑ PERMITTING& BIDDING PARKING: 18 1 1 81 20 ❑ CONSTRUCTION DOCUMJ]ENTS PARKING CALCULATIONS: 10 SPACES PER 1,000 S.F. OF GFA 2,040 S.F. OF GFA : 1,000 x 5 =20.4 = 20 SPACES rF—m m_�_ 11 11 LEGAL "ESCRIPTH"N u u LOTS 8, 9, 10, ALSO THE SOUTH 1/2 OF VACATED ALLEY TO THE NORTH BLOCK 8, BAY VIEW SUBDIVISION,AS Fog RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 9, PAGE 43 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY,FLORIDA. o No 0 All SUBJECT TO 10' FOOT WIDE RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 5925, PAGE 1205. EX. I SPDR-Y' _9 Lu r% I UN ROOM Zu"NE INFORMATIf"m tS 0 } q cn p THE ABOVE nf7q('QIQI7I) PROPERTY APPEARS TO LIE WITHIN FLOOD REMOVE EX. TURF NEW HC ZONE X PER FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP 125096 0018 D MAP REVISED: 08/19/91 cu BLOCK & ASPHALT SIGN REPLACE AA/ITW KIMAI CD LANDSCAPE Luol) ON VVALL �F CTD T° 0 _j Q. F_ A S Pf�vtl F_ IN dl_ 1 1" 5 9 2_ 5 P E 1 20 U_ U U- Q7 N 89*2356" E", iJ - X ,� 126.14' F \lAi p J ­_1 %j,- CD ­7 . ..... ------ C> Fj4 N, C> 'T cu kA,J cn t "" GULF TO BAY BLVD./S.R. 0 t V L AND] l`rLA'=^L%` cn cn 4, THIS DRAWINd'I ;66MENT O­F 'SER%nq QID - SKILL RUM THE PROPERTY OF THE S i ENGINEER, AND '94ALL NOTf, BE'REPRODUCED,. PUBLISHED OR USED IN ANY WAY WITHOUT THE C 11 9 TE ENGINEER 5. 'COPYRIGHT 2000 NOT PUBLISHED VCOPIES 6`'th�t`PLANS ARE NOT VAUD UNLESS EMBOSSED­ WITH ­THE SIGNING ENGINEER'S SEAL I[��i1� rr I[��i1�