Loading...
DRI2003-09001 (2)Tampa Bay X egional Planning Council Chair Vice-Chair Secretary/Treasurer Executive Director Commissioner Barbara Sheen Todd Commissioner Steve Simon Commissioner Jane von Hahmann Manny L. Pumariega December 8, 2003 ?.I F9® DEC 11 2003 F'L&MNINC , CrPARTMENT The Honorable Brian Aungst Mayor of the City of Clearwater CITY F .o, '•`e`??i ATER P. O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 Subject: DRI #92 - Park Place, Notice of Proposed Change, City of Clearwater Dear Mayor Aungst: The enclosed agenda item regarding the above-referenced project was considered and approved by the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council at its December 8, 2003 meeting. Please contact the Council staff if further information concerning this item is needed. Sincerely, Inn Barbara Sheen Todd Chair BSTlbj Enclosure cc: Mr. Maura R. Minges Mr. Nick Shackleton _Timothy A. Johnson, Jr., Esq. m.Ms._Gina_Clayton Mr. Robert C. Pergolizzi, AICP Mr. George L. Deakin, P.E. Ms. Manna Pennington 9455 Koger Boulevard, Suite 219, St. Petersburg, FL 33702-2491 Phone (727) 570-5151 FAX(727)570-5118 State Number 513-5066 www.tbrpc.org 9 Consent Agenda 12/08/03 NOPC Agenda Item #3.E.1. Tampa 8avXegional Planning Council Notice of Proposed Change Report 9455 Koger Blvd., Suite 219, St. Petersburg, FL 33702 Phone (727) 570-5151 Suncom 513-5066 FAX (727) 570-5118 www.tbrpc.org DRI #92 - PARK PLACE CITY OF CLEARWATER On September 11, 2003, the applicant submitted a Notice of Proposed Change application. Supplemental information was provided on October 20, 2003. The following constitutes a summary and history of the project, a description of the proposed changes, and the Council recommendation. On September 1, 1983, the City of Clearwater granted a Development Order (Ordinance No. 3205- 83) to Metro Development Corporation for a 99.1-acre commercial and office development located at the northeast corner of the S.R. 60/U.S. 19 intersection. The project was originally approved to contain 1,500,000 square feet (sq. ft.) of office space and 460,000 sq. ft. of retail space. The Development Order has subsequently been amended four times, with the latest occurring on February 1, 2001 (Ordinance No. 6678-01). The amendments have cumulatively: modified the development parameters; authorized multi-family and hotel as approved uses; consolidated the entire project into a single phase; established and modified a land use equivalency matrix for various parcels; and extended the project buildout date by 18 years (to December 31, 2003) based on the phasing consolidation. The Development Order expires on December 31, 2003. The project is currently approved for the following development entitlements: PROJECT BUILDOUT OFFICE (Sq. Ft.) INDUSTRIAL (Sq. Ft.) RETAIL (Sq. Ft.) RESIDENTIAL (M.F. Units) December 31, 2003 404,639 200,000 81,120 390 PROMO_SED_rHA1%G_E The applicant has requested additional five year extensions for the project buildout date and the Development Order expiration date, each to December 31, 2008. C{ON?I?TENCY WITH SUBSECTIOSL?$Q,Q6? FLORID,A.,S?ATUTE? The proposal is presumed to create a Substantial Deviation as defined by Subsection 380.06(19)(c), F.S., which reads as follows: `An extension of the date of buildout of a development, or any phase thereof, by 7 or more years shall be presumed to create a substantial deviation subject to further 0. - -- . development-of-regional-impact review... Any extension of the buildout date of a project or a phase thereof shall automatically extend the commencement date of the project, the termination date of the development order, the expiration date of the development of regional impact, and the phases thereof by a like period of time. " DISCUSSION Through the submittal of revised transportation analyses, the applicant has demonstrated that no additional mitigation will be necessary to offset the further extension of project buildout. All of the links in which the project assigns "significant" traffic will operate at acceptable levels of service. Indicate to the City of Clearwater and the Florida Department of Community Affairs that the proposal is presumed to be a Substantial Deviation as defined above. However, it is the opinion of this agency that the applicant has provided sufficient information to rebut the presumption of a Substantial Deviation. No unmitigated regional impacts would be anticipated as a result of this modification. Tampa 8av X egional Planning Council Chair Vice-Chair Secretary/Treasurer Executive Director Commissioner Barbara Sheen Todd Commissioner Steve Simon Commissioner Jane von Hahmann Manny L. Pumariega November 19, 2003 Mr. Maura R, Minges Bausch and Lomb, Inc. One Bausch & Lomb Place Rochester, NY 14604 Subject: DRI #92 - Park Place, Notice of Proposed Change, City of Clearwater Dear Mr. Minges: The staff of the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council has completed our review of the aforementioned NOPC application submitted in accordance with Section 380.06(19), F.S. Please see the attached "Draft" NOPC Report. Please note that this Report will appear on the Consent Agenda of the next scheduled Council meeting (December 8, 2003). I have appended a copy of a correspondence received from the Florida Department of Transportation. If you should have any questions about the Report, please do not hesitaterto' contac me7at-eXtension 255. Thank you. wE-- 'I CLJ Sincerely, NOV 2 1 2001 PLANNING DEPARTMENT J Meyer CITY OF U!TWATER DRI Coordinator cc: Mr. Nick Shackelton, CIG, Inc. Mr. Ramon Solis, Pinellas County MPO Mr. Tim Johnson, JPBR&B Mr. Kent Fast, FDOT Mr. Robert Pergolizzi, GCC,_ Inc_ Ms. Marina Pennington, FDCA Ms,. Gina.Clayton,-City-of-Clearwater Mr. George Deakin, KHA 9455 Koger Boulevard, Suite 219, St. Petersburg, FL 33702-2491 Phone (727) 570-5151 FAX(727)570-5118 State Number 513-5066 www.tbrpc.org Tampa Say.Regional ?Planning Council 0 NOPI Notice of Proposed Change Report 9455 Koger Blvd., Suite 219, St. Petersburg, FL 33702 Phone (727) 570-5151 Suncom 513-5066 FAX (727) 570-5118 www.tbrpc.org DRI #92 - PARK PLACE CITY OF CLEARWATER On September 11, 2003, the applicant submitted a Notice of Proposed Change application. Supplemental information was provided on October 20, 2003. The follONv]rn= constitutes, a summary and history of the project, a description of the proposcdchanges, and the Council recommendation. PROTECT DESCRIPTION On September 1, 1983, the City of Clearwater granted a lle\ clopmcrn Order (Ordinance No. 3205- 83) to Metro Development Corporation for a 99.1-acre commercial and ofd ice development located at the northeast corner of the S.R. 60/U.S. 19 intersCCtion. hhe project ?? as originally approved to contain 1,500,000 square feet (sq. ft.) of office spacc and -4607000 s,-I. fi. of retail space. The Development Order has subsequently hccn mncnded four titln?s, with the latest occurring on February 1, 2001 (Ordinance No. 6678-01 ). The amendments have cumulatively: modified the development parameters; authorized multi -family and hotel as approved uses; consolidated the entire project into a single phase; established and modified al and use equivalency matrix for various parcels; and extended the project buildout date by I8 }ears (to December 31, 2003) based on the phasing consolidation. The De%clopmcnt Order expires on December 31, 2003. S The project.is currentiv approved for the follo%v°inLT development entitlements: PROJECT BUILDOUT OFFICE (Sq. Ft.) INDUSTRIAL (Sq. Ft.) RETAIL (Sq. Ft.) RESIDENTIAL (M.F. Units) December 31, 2003 404.839 200,000 81,120 390 RROP_OSED C JAXGE The applicant has requested additional five year extensions for the project buildout date and the Development Order expiration date, each to December 31, 2008. ()-NSIS-TENCY WISH SUB-SE-C-TLON-3-&QA6(M,_FL-OJUDA_ST,AT-UTES. The proposal is presumed to create a Substantial Deviation as defined by Subsection 380.06(19)(c), F.S., which reads as follows: `An extension of the date of buildout of a development, or any phase thereof, by 7 or more years shall be presumed to create a substantial deviation subject to further development-of-regional-impact review... Any extension of the buildout date of a project or a phase thereof shall automatically extend the commencement date of the project, the termination date of the development order, the expiration date of the development of regional impact, and the phases thereof by a like period of time. " MSCUSaSION Through the submittal of revised transportation analyses, the applicant has demonstrated that no additional mitigation will be necessary to offset the further extension of project buildout. All of the links in which the project assigns "significant" traffic %v ill operate at acceptable levels of service. l2 DOOM VIENDED- A -CTION Indicate to the City of Clearwater and the Florida Department of Community Affairs that the proposal is presumed to be a Substantial Deviation as defined shove. However, it is the opinion of this agency that the applicant has provided sufficient iiAormatiorn to rebut the presumption of a Substantial Deviation. No unmitigated regional inipact,? Would he anticipated as a result of this modification. 9 Florida Department of Transportation 11201 N. McKinley Drive • Tampa, FL 33612-6456 • Phone (813) 975-6000 • 1-800-226-7220 JEB BUSH JOSE ABREU GOVERNOR SECRETARY November 17, 2003 Mr. John Meyer DRI Review Coordinator Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council 9455 Koger Boulevard - Suite 219 St. Petersburg, Florida 33702 Re: Park Place NOPC (DRI# 92) City of Clearwater Pinellas County, Florida Dear Mr. Meyer: We reviewed the applicant's responses to review agency comments. The NOPC requests a buildout date extension until December 31, 2008, in order to complete the project. The transportation analysis was conducted differently than I would have preferred, however I believe it is sufficient to show that the remaining portion of the project will not adversely impact the level of service on adjacent state roadways. The Department does not object to this extension of the buildout date until December 31, 2008. Thank you for this opportunity to comment. Sincerely, a ?zz Kent Fast, AICP DRI Coordinator cc: Mr. Marc Mariano, City of Clearwater Mr. George Deakin, P.E., Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Mr. Robert Pergolizzi, AICP, Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. Mr. Timothy Johnson, Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, P.A. Ms. Marina Pennington, Florida Department of Community Affairs U:1p 1730kfld ri_revild ri031031117.92. doc www. d ot. state.fl. u s ® RECYCLED PAPER • r E. D. ARMSTRONG III BRUCE H. BOKOR JOHN R. BONNER, SR.* GUY M. BURNS JONATHAN S. COLEMAN MICHAEL T. CRONIN ELIZABETH J. DANIELS BECKY FERRELL-ANTON COLLEEN M.FLYNN JOHNSON, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, P.A. ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW MARION HALE SCOTT C. ILGENFRITZ FRANK R. JAKES TIMOTHY A. JOHNSON, JR. SHARON E. KRICK ROGER A. LARSON JOHN R. LAWSON, JR* LEANNE LETIZE MICHAEL G. LITTLE MICHAEL C. MARKHAM STEPHANIE T. MARQUARDT ZACHARY D. MESSA A.R. "CHARLIE" NEAL TROY J. PERDUE F. WALLACE POPE, JR. ROBERT V. POTTER, JR. AUDREY B. RAUCHWAY DARRYL R. RICHARDS PETER A.RIVELLINI DENNIS G. RUPPEL* CHARLES A. SAMARKOS PHILIP M. SHASTEEN JOAN M. VECCHIOLI STEVEN H. WEINBERGER JOSEPH J. WEISSMAN *OF COUNSEL PLEASE REPLY TO CLEARWATER FILE No. 44384.107090 Via Federal Express October 16, 2003 Mr. John M. Meyer DRI Coordinator Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council 9455 Koger Boulevard, Suite 219 St. Petersburg, FL 33702-2491 Re: DRI #92 - Park Place - NOPC Application Dear John: Enclosed for review by all reviewing agencies are the applicants' responses to the comments received from the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council and the Florida Department of Transportation. The disk referred to in the responses has been provided to your consultant, George Deakin. CLEARWATER OFFICE 911 CHESTNUT ST. POST OFFICE BOX 1368 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33757-1368 TELEPHONE: (727) 461-1818 TELECOPIER: (727) 462-0365 OCT ' - 2003 TAMPA OFFICE 100 N. TAMPA ST. SUITE 1800 POST OFFICE BOX 1100 TAMPA, FLORIDA 33601-1100 TELEPHONE: (813) 225-2500 TELECOPIER: (813) 223-7118 .1' 0 0 JOHNSON, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, P.A. ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW Mr. John M. Meyer October 16, 2003 Page 2 If you have any questions or require any additional information, please contact my legal assistant, Jayne Sears, or me. Very trul urs, mothy A. Johnson, Jr. TAJ/js encls. cc w/encls: Ms. Gina L. Clayton, City of Clearwater (via Hand Delivery) Ms. Marina Pennington, DCA (via Federal Express) Mr. Al Navaroli, Pinellas County Mr. Ramon Solis, Pinellas County Mr. Kent Fast, FDOT (via Federal Express) Mr. George Deakin, Kimley-Horn & Assoc. (via Federal Express) Ms. Maura Minges, Bausch & Lomb Mr. Nick Shackleton, Park Place Land Robert Pergolizzi, AICP #303084 v1 i OAT 1 ? 2003 PU,. . 0 0 RESPONSES TO TAMPA BAY REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL Letter of October 10, 2003 1. Additional Information, Appendices A, B and C. Please supply a copy of the HCS electronic files used in the traffic analysis, or provide the multi- page printout for each HCS analysis. If electronic files are submitted, please provide an equivalency table that notes the intersection name, the corresponding electronic file name, the year of the analysis, and the development scenario'being analyzed. A disk containing the intersection analyses is included as well as an equivalency table with the pertinent information. Existing intersections and intersections significantly impacted by Park Place are included. There are 18 files on the disk. 2. Coordinated Signal Timing, HCS Arterial Analysis, Appendices A, B and C. In the arterial analysis, if the traffic signals are assumed to be coordinated, then all of the traffic signals in the analyzed arterial should have the same cycle length. Please revise the arterial analysis accordingly. The HCS arterial analysis used the existing cycle length for signals as provided by the City of Clearwater. The portion of Gulf to Bay Boulevard between Keene Road and U.S. 19 operates on a 120 second cycle, however, the Gulf to Bay Boulevard/Belcher intersection operates on a 150 second cycle consistently. The reference to an HCS analysis is incorrect. The ARTPLAN analysis on pages B-1 and B-2 demonstrates the segment operates acceptably in existing and future situations. It is attached for reference. 3. Year 2008, HCS Arterial Analysis, Appendix 1C. In the year 2008 arterial analysis, the computed "v/c" for each segment should have a value of 1.0 or less. Please revise the arterial analysis accordingly. As noted in the Highway Capacity Manual 2000, Page 15-5, top sidebar note, at the top of the page, right margin "The vlc ratio (X) for a lane group cannot be greater than 1.0 to compute uniform delay." The ARTPLAN analysis on pages B-1 and B-2 demonstrates the capacity of this segment of Gulf to Bay Boulevard. Table 4 shows that for the majority of the segment, expected 2008 traffic does not exceed originally approved traffic, therefore traffic impacts have been mitigated already. Accordingly, a detailed analysis is only necessary on the segments of Gulf to Bay between Old Coachman Road and U.S. 19, and Benigans to McMullen Booth Road. The reference to an HCS arterial analysis is incorrect. The ARTPLAN analysis in Appendix B shows acceptable operations -can be maintained on all of these segments. It is attached for reference. I ?l f ?? r 4. WC Ratios, HCS Signalized Intersection Analysis, Appendix C. In the Year 2008 signalized intersection analysis, the computed 'Vc" for each lane group must have a value of 1.0 or less. Please revise the intersection analysis accordingly. If the v/c ratio is larger than 1.0, it indicates queue carryover from one period to another. The standard HCS analysis does not consider queue carryover from one period to another. For example, at the bottom of Page C-11, the westbound left turn has a v/c ratio greater than 1.0 (it is 1.21). Please revise this signalized intersection analysis and the other analyses so that the v/c for any lane group has a value of 1.0, or less. Historically, intersection levels of service for DRI analyses are based on the operations of the- intersection as a whole. It is understood that certain movements at signalized intersections will experience significant delay and congestion due to signal timing plans, etc. Revising, any intersection analysis to ensure all v/c ratios for all movements that are less than 1.0 is virtually impossible in many instances. Furthermore, at the June 24, 2003, methodology meeting, v/c ratios of less than 1.0 for all movements was not requested by the review agencies. The applicant. has already contributed its proportionate share to mitigate its impacts and these improvements have been constructed. 5. Intersection Capacity Consumed by Full-Project, Appendix C. Pages C-1 and C-2. Please make the following changes to the "Intersection Capacity Consumed by Full-Project" methodology, on Pages C-1 and C-2. The total intersection capacity should be revised so that the capacity of the intersection is the sum of the capacity of the critical movements (the critical movements are noted by the software), not the sum of the capacity of all movements. The intersection capacity needs to be adjusted from the noted Level of Service E capacity to Level of Service D capacity. The adjustment factor is 0.885.. Please multiply the intersection capacities by 0.885 to obtain the Level of Service D capacity. The HCS analysis is for the 15-minute period within the PM peak hour. The software divides the input "volumes" by the PHF when calculating the "adjusted flow rate." Accordingly, please divide the "Full-Project" volumes by the PHF to derive the project volumes that are used by the HCS software to calculate level of service. The agreed to methodology stated "The study area will also include signalized intersections where project traffic consumes 4.5% or more of intersection 2 0 0 capacity." At the methodology meeting, the use of critical movement analysis was not requested. Intersections function as a whole unit. Previously approved analysis of Park Place and other DRI's have considered the full intersection capacity, not just certain movements. The Intersection Capacity Consumed by Full-Project chart on C-1 and C-2 has been revised to calculate LOS D capacity (adjustment factor 0.885), however, the actual project volumes are analyzed as stated in the methodology since the basic unit of measure for project traffic is volume. A revision of pages C-1 and C-2 is attached. 6. Exhibit D: Park Place DRI Substantial Deviation Determination Chart. There appears to be many discrepancies between the NOPC application Exhibit D and the other information in the NOPC application. For example, in Exhibit D, in the "Type and Land Use" column, for the office category, it is stated in the far right column titled "Previous DO Change and Date" that the latest previous approval was for "795,520 SF GFA." Then in footnote 1, it is noted that some of the office was traded for multi-family, so that the remaining office after the trade-off is "635,680 SF GFA." This is not consistent with the information contained in Exhibit B (Traffic Analysis Report, dated September 2003). In Exhibit B, page 2, it is notes that the latest approved development is: Retail = 81,120 SF Office = 404,639 SF Light Industrial = 200,000 SF Multi-family = 390 DU Another inconsistency is that in Exhibit D, for the residential category, it is noted in the "Proposed Plan" column that "Proposed amendment will allow office development on an additional parcel (Parcel 6) to be converted to multi-family." The proposed conversion is not discussed in Exhibit B (Traffic Analysis Report, dated September, 2003). Please revise Exhibit D, and the other NOPC application information so that there is consistency from document to document. Attached is a revised Exhibit D, Substantial Deviation Chart, consistent with the NOPC application. 7. Although not stated in the NOPC application, it is assumed that the development is seeking an identical five-year extension of the Development Order expiration date (to December 31, 2008). If this is correct, appropriate representation to this fact should be incorporated into the application and the proposed amendatory language. 3 0 0 The applicants do request a 5-year extension of the Development Order expiration date to December 31, 2008. Attached is a revised Exhibit E, proposed ordinance, reflecting the proposed amendatory language. 8. The proposed Master Development Plan identifies a last revised date of August 22, 2003. Please identify all proposed changes to the Map and the prior date of revision(s). The only changes to the plan were the following: (1) The name of the consultant changed. (2) The date was updated. (3) The columns for existing and planned development for the office category were revised as follows: Existing Planned Office 22,460-304,639 SF 182 170 100,000SF The totals of the existing and planned development columns were revised accordingly. (4) The build-out date in Note #2 was revised to ,December 31, 2008. (5) The phrase "as approved by Ordinance 6678-01" was added to Note #5. Attachments: Disk for TBRPC Consultant - HCS Intersections HCS Intersection Analyses Revised Tables of Exhibit B - Traffic Analysis Revised Exhibit "D" (Substantial Deviation Chart) Revised Exhibit "E" (Ordinance) 4 • • RESPONSE TO FLORIDA DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION Letter of October 9, 2003 1. At the transportation methodology meeting we did not discuss what constitutes a "recent" traffic count. However I was expecting traffic counts to be more recent than July 2001 for Drew Street and for SR 60. Please ask the consultant to describe the current traffic conditions for these streets and explain why these 2001 counts should still be considered acceptable. Drew Street carries approximately 31% of the project traffic and SR 60 carries 38% of project traffic from the site. This was not explicitly stated in the report, however, due to construction at the U.S. 19/Drew Street interchange the City of Clearwater did not have any counts more recent than July 2001. The 2001 AADT was the latest count available from the MPO when this study was prepared. Typically counts are adjusted by a growth rate, however in this case the background growth rate is 0% based on the methodology meeting agreement that the area is built out. The applicant used these counts to establish baseline 2003 conditions; however, traffic from the Clearwater Mall Redevelopment was specifically added to show growth for the future year analysis. The AADT on SR 60 is 55,204 per the count. 2. In the HCS arterial analysis for SR 60, the cycle lengths should be the same if the signals are to be coordinated for both 2003 and 2008 time frames. Why was not an arterial analysis completed for Drew Street also? Please revisit and revise if warranted. Drew Street was analyzed using the FDOT generalized tables since its operation reflects that of a typical arterial. The capacities shown for Drew Street in Table 1, Table 3 and Table 5 in the report reflect capacity exists using the generalized tables, therefore a more detailed technique (i.e.: HCS) was unnecessary. 3. 1 do not follow the logic of Tables 2A and 2B of the analysis. It appears that with transit and retail pass-by capture reductions, the retail parcels will experience a very significant reduction in traffic generated at the driveways. Please verify that pass-by traffic does not exceed 10% of adjacent street traffic. Also ask the applicant to explain the process used to reduce the external traffic. Perhaps one table with a column for each category of reduction would assist the review agencies in determining the accuracy of the calculations. Table 2A is a comparison of the originally approved plan with the current plan. The first "chart" in Table 2A is the trip impact of the original plan and shows 2,576 PM peak trips of which 2,318 are external. 5 0 0 The second "chart" in Table 2A is the trip generation of the proposed plan. It calculates the 1,797 PM peak hour trips to be generated by the proposed plan, of which 270 are internal (15 %) and 1,527 are external. The comparison of the 1,527 to the 2,318 is the 34.1% reduction discussed in the text on the top of page 5 in the report. The third "chart" of Table 2A applies the approved 2.5% transit capture to the external trips. Therefore, of the 1,527 external trips 1,489 are by auto. The fourth "chart" of Table 2A applied retail pass-by capture. Of the 1,489 external auto trips, 258 were calculated using ITE procedures to be pass-by. Therefore the external primary trips are 1,231. The text on the top of page 5 explains the process and stated the 258 pass-by trips represent only 5.3% of adjacent peak hour traffic on SR 60 (258/4870). A composite chart of the reductions is shown below. PM Peak Internal External Auto Passby Primary 1,797 270 1,527 1,489 258 1,231 4. It appears that Table 2B is depicting project traffic that has been built already, and is thus on the roadway. How does the 100,000 square feet of office in Parcel 6 get counted? Please document. The 100,000 s.f. of office yet to be built on Parcels 5 and 6 is not included in Table 2B since it does not exist. 10/16/2003 12:35 PM 44384.107090 #303031 v1 6 • • 1. GTBHERXS 2. GTBBELXS 3. GT30LDXS 4. GT 319XS 5. GTBBGNXS 6. GTBPPXS 7. GTBSKYXS 8. GTBHMPXS 9.. GTBMCMXS 10. DREWBELXS 11. DREWOLDXS 12. DREW19XS 13. DREWFAIRXS 14. DREWMMPXS 15. DREWMCMXS 16. GTBBGNFU 17. GTBPPFU 18. DREWFAIRFU HCS INTERSECTION ANALYSES Gulf to Bay/ Hercules Existing 2003 Gulf to Bay/ Belcher Existing 2003 Gulf to Bay/Old Coachman Existing 2003 Gulf to Bay/ US 19 Ramps Existing 2003 Gulf to BayBenigans/Mall West Existing 2003 Gulf to Bay/Park Place/Mall East Existing 2003 Gulf to Bay/Sky Harbor Existing 2003 Gulf to Bay/ Hampton Existing 2003 Gulf to Bay/McMullen Booth Existing 2003 Drew / Belcher Existing 2003 Drew / Old Coachman Existing 2003 Drew / US 19 Existing 2003 Drew / Fairwood / Park Place Existing 2003 Drew / Hampton Existing 2003 Drew McMullen Booth Existing 2003 Gulf to Bay / Benigans / Mall West Future 2008 Gulf to Bay / Park Place / Mall East Future 2008 Drew / Fairwood / Park Place Future 2008 TABLE 1 PARK PLACE DRI TRAFFIC ANALYSIS EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS - 2003 ?i O ' ROADWAY BETWEEN LOS D LOS D LANE PEAK HR MSFR MSFR LOS LOS AND TYPE VOLUME NB/EB SBNVB NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SBNVB SR 60 ARCTURAS HERCULES 6LD 4417 2331 2086 2980 2740 B B SR 60 HERCULES BELCHER 6LD 4405 2317 2088 2980 2740 D D SR 60 BELCHER OLD COACHMAN 6LD 4644 2317 2327 2740 2980 D D SR 60 OLD COACHMAN US 19 6LD 5099 2334 2765 2740 2980 D D SR 60 US 19 BENIGANS DRIVE 6LD 4968 2360 2608 2820 3050 C C SR 60 BENIGANS DRIVE PARK PLACE BLVD 6LD 4870 2334 2536 2820 3050 C C SR 60 PARK PLACE BLVD SKY HARBOR 6LD 4904 2402 2502 2820 3050 C C SR 60 SKY HARBOR HAMPTON 6LD 4853 2382 2471 2820 3050 C C SR 60 HAMPTON MCMULLEN BOOTH 6LD 4970 2350 2620 2820 3050 C C US 19 HARN DRUID/SEVILLE 6LD 7564 4311 3253 3850 2900 F F US 19 DRUID/SEVILLE SR 60 6LFRWY 7564 4311 3253 5410 4430 D D US 19 SR 60 DREW 6LFRWY 6680 3474 3206 5410 4430 C C US 19 DREW SR 590 6LFRWY 6312 3323 2989 5410 4430 C C US 19 SR 590 SUNSET POINT 6LFRWY 7592 4479 3113 5410 4430 D C DREW STREET SR 590 BELCHER 4LD 2181 1.576 605 1770 1450 C B DREW STREET BELCHER OLD COACHMAN 4LD 2468 1477 991 1770 1450 C B DREW STREET OLD COACHMAN US 19 4LD 2619 1440 1179 1770 1450 B B DREW STREET US 19 PARK PLACE BLVD 4LD 1448 865 583 1770 1450 B B DREW STREET PARK PLACE BLVD HAMPTON 4LD 1456 757 699 1770 1450 B B DREW STREET HAMPTON MCMULLEN BOOTH 4LD 1386 756 630 1770 1450 B B BASED ON MPO TRAFFIC COUNTS AND GCC TRAFFIC COUNTS JULY/AUGUST 2003 ASSUMES INTERCHANGES AT DREW, SR 590, SUNSET POINT • • TABLE 2A PARK PLACE DR] TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ORIGINAL DEVELOPMENT ORDER APPROVED PLAN TRIP GENERATION ITE DAILY PM PEAK TOTAL TOTAL EXTERNAL EXTERNAL un. n.r ro.ne To.oe .u7couAl CYTCONAI CNTPO CYIT OFFICE 710 198.000 S.F. 2242 301 30 271 46 225 OFFICE 710 150,000 S.F. 1812 247 25 222 38 184 OFFICE 710 150,000 S.F. 1812 247 25 222 38 184 OFFICE 710 480000 S.F.. 4427 617 62 555 94 461 OFFICE 710 125,000 S.F. 1575 219 22 197 34 163 RETAIL 820 135,000 S.F. 8267 765 76 689 331 358 RETAIL 820 15,000 S.F. 2012 180 18 162 78 84 IVIAL "141 4010 c1j0 w.v wa .vva PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PLAN TRIP GENERATION ITE DAILY PM PEAK TOTAL TOTAL EXTERNAL EXTERNAL . ..w -WV Tllloc TolOe IuTCOUAI CYTCONAI PNTCR FYIT 1 LT. INDUSTRIAL 110 200,000 S.F. 1394 196 10 186 23 163 20 APARTMENTS 220 390 D.U. 2471 229 71 158 106 52 4 OFFICE 710 101,900 S.F. 1346 193 9 184 31 153 5&6 OFFICE 710 220,560 S.F. 2436 327 16 311 53 258 7&9 RETAIL 820 55,278 S.F. 4656 424 97 327 157 170 8 OFFICE 710 82,179 S.F. 1141 171 8 163 28 135 10&11 RETAIL 820 25,842 S.F. 2856 59 95 103 IVIAL 101;1VV - K::?/ `.air --- WITH TRANSIT CAPTURE OF 2.5% PM ITE DAILY PM PEAK TOTAL EXTERNAL EXTERNAL EXTERNAL . ...n ucc . nn Au^"Lrr Toloe TOIOe CYTPONAI Al ITA FNTPR FYIT 1 LT. INDUSTRIAL 110 200,000 S.F. 1394 196 186 181 22 159 2&3 APARTMENTS 220 390 D.U. 2471 229 158 154 103 51 4 OFFICE 710 101,900 S.F. 1346 193 184 180 31 149 5&6 OFFICE 710 220 560 S.F. 2436 327 311 303 52 251 7&9 RETAIL 820 55,278 S.F. 4656 424 327 319 153 166 8 OFFICE 710 82,179 S.F. 1141 171 163 159 27 132 10&11 RETAIL 820 25,842 S.F. 2856 257 93 100 IVIAL I 7wuu 1101 Ia\ c1 f .\ q0a ? yv. .wv WITH TRANSIT AND RETAIL PASSBY TRAFFIC PM PEAK EXTERNAL ITE DAILY PM PEAK EXTERNAL PRIMARY PRIMARY PRIMARY 11A ^0l 0 . Aun..eo I II!` AunI RUT TOIOe Tolo-A Al ITA TRIPS FNTFR FYIT 1 LT. INDUSTRIAL 110 200.000 S.F. 1394 196 181 181 22 159 2&3 APARTMENTS 220 390 D.U. 2471 229 154 154 103 51 4 OFFICE 710 101 900 S.F. 1346 193 180 180 31 149 5&6 OFFICE 710 220,560 S.F. 2436 327 303 303 52 251 7&9 RETAIL 820 55,278 S.F. 4656 424 319 173 83 90 8 OFFICE 710 82179 S.F. 1141 171 159 159 27 132 10&11 RETAIL 820 25,842 S.F. 2856 257 39 42 I IVIAL I 1011vv ./a/ =v .?.i J. / JJ• - NOTES: 1. BASED ON ITE TRIP GENERATION, 6TH EDITION 2. PRIMARY TRIPS ARE NON-PASS-BY TRIPS 3. PASS43Y CAPTURE BASED ON TRIP GENERATION HANDBOOK 2001 AND APPLIED TO RETAIL ONLY 4. RETAIL SPACE OF 81,120 S.F. ACTUALLY EXISTS 5. TOTAL PROJECT IMPACT IS 1,231 PM PEAK HOUR EXTERNAL PRIMARY AUTO TRIPS (357 ENTERING/874 EXITING) TABLE 2B PARK PLACE DRI TRAFFIC ANALYSIS TRIP GENERATION OF EXISTING DEVELOPMENT ITE DAILY PM PEAK TOTAL TOTAL EXTERNAL EXTERNAL owercl a t Aun I Ice 1 ur AUM MIT TRIPR TRIPS INTFRNAI_ EXTERNAL ENTER EXIT 1 LT. INDUSTRIAL 1.10 100,000 S.F 697 98 5 93 11 82 2&3 APARTMENTS 220 390 D.U. 2471 229 46 183 123 60 4 OFFICE 710 101 900 S.F 1346 193 ,9 184 31 153 5&6 OFFICE 710 120,560 S.F 1532 214 11 203 35 168 7&9 RETAIL 820 55,278 S.F. 4656 424 85 339 163 176 8 OFFICE 710 82,179 S.F. 1141 171 8 163 28 135 10&11 RETAIL 820 25,842 S.F. 2856 257 51 206 99 107 IOIAL 1 740mv 7700 L17 gait rav OWN WITH TRANSIT CAPTURE OF 2.5% ITE DAILY PM PEAK TOTAL EXTERNAL EXTERNAL EXTERNAL -A r1=1 Y I wun IIQC 1 I lr euAIIWT TDIDQ TDIDQ CYTFDNAI At ITf1 PNTPR EXIT 1 LT. INDUSTRIAL 110 100,000 S.F 697 98 93 91 11 80 2&3 APARTMENTS 220 390 D.U. 2471 229 183 178 119 59 4 OFFICE 710 101,900 S.F 1346 193 184 180 31 149 5&6 OFFICE 710 120,560 S.F 1532 214 203 198 34 164 7&9 RETAIL 820 55,278 S.F. 4656 424 339 330 159 171 8 OFFICE 710 82,179 S.F. 1141 171 163 159 27 132 10&11 RETAIL 820 25,842 S.F. 2856 257 206 200 96 104 TOTAL 1 7401110 1700 73/7 7330 411 ovu WITH TRANSIT CAPTURE AND RETAIL PASS-BY CAPTURE ITE DAILY PM PEAK EXTERNAL PRIMARY PRIMARY PRIMARY DeDrcl 1 eun I ICC 1 l if, AYIl111NT TRIPS TRIPS AIITA TRIPS ENTER EXIT 1 LT. INDUSTRIAL 110 100,000 S.F 697 98 91 91 11 80 2&3 APARTMENTS 220 390 D.U. 2471 229 178 178 119 59 4 OFFICE 710 101 900 S.F 1346 193 180 180 31 149 5&6 OFFICE 710 120,560 S.F 1532 214 198 198 34 164 7&9 RETAIL 820 55,278 S.F. 4656 424 330 ' 178 85 93 8 OFFICE 710 82,179 S.F. 1141 171 159 159 27 132 10&11 RETAIL 820 25,842 S.F. 2856 257 200 81 39 42 1 TOTAL 1 1 4 0 ` 11 ` 11 7 700 7 330 IUD* 340 f l u NOTES: 1. BASED ON ITE TRIP GENERATION, 6TH EDITION 2. PRIMARY TRIPS ARE NON-PASS-BY TRIPS 3. PASS-BY CAPTURE BASED ON TRIP GENERATION HANDBOOK, 2001 AND APPLIED TO RETAIL ONLY 4. RETAIL SPACE OF 81,120 S.F. ACTUALLY EXISTS 5. EXISTING PROJECT IMPACT IS 1,065 PM PEAK HOUR EXTERNAL PRIMARY AUTO TRIPS (346 ENTERING/719 EXITING) TABLE 4 PARK-PLACE DRI TRAFFIC ANALYSIS COMPARISON OF PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS 1991 1991 1991 2008 2008 2008 2008 BUILDOUTBUILDOUTBUILDOUTBUILDOUI BUILDOUT BUILDOUTBUILDOUT LANE VOLUME VOLUME VOLUME VOLUME VOLUME VOLUME GREATER ROADWAY BETWEEN ANn TYPF TW[1.WAV NR/FR _AMMM TWA_WAV NRlFR ARNI/D IUDMf T SR 60 HERCULES BELCHER 6LD 5435 2660 2775 4606 2410 NO SR 60 BELCHER OLD COACHMAN 6LD 5040 2455 2585 4859 2410 NO SR 60 OLD COACHMAN US 19 6LD 5545 2830 2715 5334 2427 YES WB SR 60 US 19 BENIGANS 6LD 8360 2945 3415 5658 2678 fl2982 NO SR 60 BENIGANS PARK PLACE 6LD. 5080 2200 2880 5543 2592 YES SR 60 PARK PLACE SKY HARBOR 6LD 4340 2145 2195 5298 2643 YES SR 60 SKY HARBOR HAMPTON 6LD 4450 2205 2245 5185 2663 YES SR 60 HAMPTON MCMULLEN BOOTH 6LD 4485 2305 2180 5302 2631 2771 YES DREW BELCHER OLD COACHMAN 4LD 1885 980 905 2578 1536 1042 YES DREW OLD COACHMAN US 19 4LD 2045 975 1070 2738 1497 1239 YES DREW US 19 PARK PLACE 4LD 2740 1520 1220 1499 888 631 NO 'APPROVED 1991 BUILDOUT VOLUMES FOR WHICH MITIGATION HAS BEEN COMPLETED • • TABLE B FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS WITH PROJECT -2008 EXISTING EXISTING BACK. BACK. UNBUILT UNBUILT TOTAL TOTAL 2003 2003 2008 2008 PROJECT PROJECT 2008 2008 LANE PM PM PM PM TRAFFIC TRAFFIC PM PM ROADWAY RFTWFFN ANfl TVDC uC/eD QDMro ?In/On Dneun -1- nen.m LOS D LOS D MSFR MSFR LOS LOS SR 60 HERCULES BELCHER 8LD 2317 2088 2408 2170 2 25 2410 2195 2980 2740 D D SR 60 BELCHER OLD COACHMAN 8LD 2317 2327 2408 2418 2 31 2410 2449 2740 2980 D D SR 60 OLD COACHMAN US 19 6LD 2334 2785 2425 2873 2 34 2427 2907 2740 2980 D D SR 60 US 19 BENIGANS 8LD 2380 2608 2872 2923 4 59 2678 2982 2820 3050 C D SR 60 BENIGANS PARK PLACE 8LD 2334 2538 2588 2892 4 59 2592 2951 2820 3050 C C SR 60 PARK PLACE SKY HARBOR 8LD 2402 2502 2812 2851 31 2 2843 2853 2820 3050 C C SR 60 SKY HARBOR HAMPTON 8LD 2382 2471 2532 2820 31 2 2563 2822 2820 3050 C C SR 60 HAMPTON MCMULLEN BOOTH 8LD 2350 2620 2500 2789 31 2 2531 2771 2820 3050 C C DREW BELCHER OLD COACHMAN 4LD 1477 991 1535 1030 1 12 . 1538 1042 1770 1450 C B DREW OLD COACHMAN US 19 4LD 1440 1179 1498 1225 1 14 1497 1239 1770 1450 C C DREW US 19 PARK PLACE 4LD 885 583 885 583 3 48 888 831 1770 1450 B B BASED ON SCREENLINE GROWTH RATES INCLUDES TRAFFIC FROM CLEARWATER MALL REDEVELOPMENT INCLUDES ADDITIONAL UNBUILT PROJECT TRAFFIC ONLY • 0 .I- l ul L v Page ! of • ARTPLAN 2002 Conceptual Planning Analysis Description/ File Information Enam3nd il Settings\Robert\My Date Prepared Documents\PINELLAS\PARKPLACE\AP_ARTSR60 W .xml 8/18/2003 Program ARTPLAN Version Analyst RP Agency 5.1.1 GCC District ?n Arterial Name SR 60 Intersection I KEENE End US 1 9 Intersection Study Peak Period K100 Direction =Ea User SR 60 (KEENE - US 19) Notes Facility Data -'? Roadway Variables Traffic Variables Control Variables J Multimodal Variables Area Type Urbanized AADT 55200 Class 2 K 0.09 Posted Speed 40 D 0.52 # Thru Lanes 61 PHF 0.93 I AJ rrival Type 4 Signals/Mile 2.50 Cycle Length 120 Through g/C 0.54 Paved Shoulder/Bike No Lane Outside Lane ical Width yp Pavement Condition ypical Sidewalk Yes Turns Excl. Median Type Restrictive Lanes Left Turn % Heavy Yes Vehicles Lanes 12 -I ?? Sidewalk/Roadway T ical Control Type Semiactuated Separation YP Sidewalk/Roadway No Protective Barrier I Base Sat Flow Rate Local Adj. Factor 1900 0.98 O tacle to Bus No Istop Bus Freq A Adjusted Sat Flow Rate 1825 Bus Span Of 15 Service file:HC:\Docwnents%20and%2OSettings\Robert\Local%2OSettings\Temp\preview.xml 8/18//2003 Q ^i ragcZUij • Automobile Segment Data • Cycle C Arr. °/b # Dir. Length AADT FFS " Median Type Segment # to ARCTURAS) i g/ Length 120 0.82 Turns Lanes ???? 0.26515 49808 y. 2331 45 Restrictive ( HERCULES) t 2 120 0.54 0.26515 OC?? 49808 2331 45 Restrictive o ( BELCHER) t 3 120 0.5 ? F?I ,t 0.56818 49509 2317 45 Restrictive o ( OLD COACHMAN) t 120 0.64 10 F--?30.73864 -41 49509 2317 45 Restrictive o 4 ( US 19) t 5 130 0.45 35 ?3 0.26515 49872 2334 45 Restrictive o ( Automobile LOS Segment # Thru Mvmt Flow Rate v/c Control Delay Int. Approach LOS Speed Segment (mph) LOS 1 (to ARCTURAS) 24811 F 0:55 0.4 A 38 Al 2 (to HERCULES) 2281 0.77 16.89 F B 22.9 C BELCHER) t 3 C 28.2 B 2292 0.84 21.59 o ( 4 (to OLD COACHMAN) I -? 2242 0.64 6.57 r- NI 36.7 C? o US 19) Fs {t ?- 1631 0:66 24.46 C 19.4 D Arterial Length 2.1 Auto Speed 29.0 Auto LOS Automobile Service Volume Tables Lanes , Hourly Volume In Peak Direction 1 *** *** ** -?? 770-990 1LIF 2 120 1660 198 *** *** - ?- 3. *** *** 200 2570 2980 r 4 270 3480 3970 *** *** * 200 2570 2980 *** *** Lanes Hourly Volume In Both Directions 2 **-J 1470 1910 ?? *** *** q ?- 240 3190 -1 3810 *** - *** 6 -? 4930 380 C - 5720 *** *** 8 -? ? 7630 *** *** 520 6690 * 380 j 4930 5720 *** *** Lanes Annual Average Daily Traffic 2 ** 16300 21200 ***? *** q 2600 35400 42400 *** *** 6--1 4200-, 54800 63600 ?- 8 5700 74300 84800 ?r *** *** _ * *** *** 63600 11 4200 54800 0Fr= -PtAK ?. 8 S &J-0 iSa Z3Lo z,?4o file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\Robert\Local%20Settings\Temp\preview.xml 8/18/2003 ?_> - Z- INTERSECTION CAPACITY CONSUMED BY FULL PROJECT DREW STREET/BELCHER ROAD LOS D EBL EBT+R WBL WBT+R NBL NBT+R SBL SBT+R SUM capacity PROJECT TRAFFIC 0 14 9 61 0 4 7 0 95 95 LANE GROUP CAPACITY 307 1005 286 960 168 1182 168 1192 5268 4662 PERCENTIMPACTE D 2.04% DREW STREET/OLD COACHMAN LOS D EBL EBT+R WBL WBT+R NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT+R SUM Ca aci PROJECT TRAFFIC 0 28 0 79 0 0 0 3 0 110 110 LANE GROUP CAPACITY 345 1383 283 1314 350 710 227 716 5328 4715 PERCENTIMPACTE D 2.33% DREW STREET/US 19 - LOS D 9 BL EBT EBR WBL WBT+R NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR SUM Capacity PROJECT TRAFFIC 0 32 0 0 271 0 0 0 79 0 0 382 382 LANE GROUP CAPACITY 297 546 244 311 672 310 5700 765 148 5700 620 15313 13552.01 NB/SB THROUGH IS OVERPASS CONTAINING 3 LAN ES EACH DIRECTION 1900'3=5700 PERCENT IMPACTE D 2.82% DREW STREET/PARK PLACE/FAIRWOOD LOS D EBL EBT+R WBL WBT+R NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR SUM Ca ad PROJECT TRAFFIC 0 111 29 0 271 9 70 0 3 0 493 493 LANE GROUP CAPACITY 361 1390 361 1334 412 440 374 381 390 5443 4817 PERCENT IMPACTE D 10.23% DREW STREET/HAMPTON LOS D EBT+R WBL WBT NBL NBR SUM Capacity PROJECT TRAFFIC 70 0 29 0 0 99 99 LANE GROUP CAPACITY 1655 477 2316 386 345 5179 - 4583 PERCENTIMPACTE D 2.16% SR 60/BELCHER LOS D EBL EBT+R WBL WBT+R NBL NBT+R SBL SBT+R SUM Capacity PROJECT TRAFFIC 0 57 35 140 0 [ 14 0 0 246 246 LANE GROUP CAPACITY 227 1985 227 1972 262 763 262 765 6463 5720 PERCENT IMPACTED 4.30% a- E SR 601OLD COACHMAN LOS D EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT+R NBL NBT+R SBL SBT+R SUM Ca aci PROJECT TRAFFIC 0 71 0 0 192 0 0 0 0 263 263 LANE GROUP CAPACITY 165 2990 976 169 2933 156 325 168 315 8197 7254 PERCENT IMPACTED 3.63% SR 60/US 19 LOS D EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR SUM Ca acct PROJECT TRAFFIC 0 79 0 140 192 0 0 ] 0 57 0 0 0 468 468 LANE GROUP CAPACITY 381 1902 621 463 2088 682 607 ---5700 280 607 3800 Mn 17411 15408.74 NB OVERPASS 3 LANES ' 1900VPHPL = 5700, SB OVERPASS 2 LANES " 1900VPHPL = 3800 PERCENT IMPACTE D 3.04% SR 60/BENIGANS/MALL WEST LOS D EBL EBT WBL WBT NBR SBL SBT+R SUM Capacity PROJECT TRAFFIC 0 136 0 222 0 0 100 458 458 LANE GROUP CAPACITY 57 3405 57 3428 310 340 305 7902 6993 INCLUDES IMPROVEMENTS BEING MADE BY CLEARWATER M ALL PERCENT IMPACTED 6.660/0 SR 60/PARK PLACE/MALL EAST EBL EBT+R WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR SUM LOS D Capacity PROJECT TRAFFIC 0 136 0 0 71 0 7 0 157 17 182 570 570 LANE GROUP CAPACITY 207 2619 207 2648 865 252 244 207 249 244 207 7949 7035 INCLUDES IMPROVEMENTS BEING MADE BY CLEARWATER M ALL PERCENT IMPACTE D 8.10% SR 60/SKY HARBOR LOS D EBL EBT+R WBL WBT+R NBL NBT+R SBL SBT+R SUM Ca aci PROJECT TRAFFIC 0 175 0 71 0 0 0 0 246 246 LANE GROUP CAPACITY 59 3823 67 3821 75 184 106 188 8323 7366 INCLUDES IMPROVEMENTS BEING MADE BY CLEAR WATER M ALL PERCENT IMPACTE D 3.34% r? .ue It, r? • Detailed Report rage i or HCS2000 DE TAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst RP Agency or Co. GCC Date Performed 8112103 Time Period PM PEAK Intersection SR 601HERCULES Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction FDOT/CLEARWATER 2003 EXISTING Analysis Year CONDITIONS Project ID Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, Ni 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 Lane group L TR L TR L TR L TR Volume, V (vph) 210 005 . 116 167 1816 105 62 338 112 200 333 208 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 7 2 2 7 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Pretimed (P) or actuated p+) A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective reen, a 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 4 3 4 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 FA N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, Nm Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing l. Left EW Perm 03 04 SB Only NS Perm 07 08 l 11.0 EG= G = 59.0 G= G= G= 10.0 G= 20.0 G= G Timing 6 Y= 6 Y= Y= Y= 3 Y= 5 Y= y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 120.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 233 2357 186 2135 69 500 222 601 Lane group capacity, c 224 370 224 2370 128 568 210 917 v/c ratio, X 1.04 0.99 0.83 0.90 0.54 0.88 1.06 0.66 file://C:\Documentslo20and%20Settings\Robert\Local%20Settings\Temp\s2klC.tmp 8/16/2003 A-9 Detailed Report 0 0 ra6c/- vi/? Total green ratio, g/C 0.63 0.49 0.63 0.49 0.17 0.17 0.28 0.28 Uniform delay, di 37.6 30.3 35.4 27.8 45.8 48.8 428 38.5 Progression factor, PF 1.000 0.779 1.000 .779 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.50 0.50 0.37 0.42 0.14 0.41 0.50 0.23 Incremental delay, d2 71.0 17.2 22.4 5.2 4.5 14.9 78.0 1.7 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 108.7 40.8 57.8 26.9 50.3 63.7 120.8 40.2 Lane group LOS F D E C D E F D Approach delay 46.9 29.4 62.1 61.9 Approach LOS D C E E Intersection delay 43.8 Intersection LOS D HCS2000TM Copyright ® 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved version a.1 c file://C:\Documents9/o2Oand%2Q$gttings\Robert\Local%20$etdngs\Tomp\s2klC.tmp 8/16/2003 A f J Detailed Report Page 1 of 2 • HCS2000'" DE TAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst RP Agency or Co. GCC Date Performed 811212003 Time Period . PM PEAK Intersection SR 60BELCHER Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction FDOT/CLEARWATER 2003 Analysis Year EXISTING CONDITIONS Project ID Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, Ni 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 Lane group L TR L TR L TR L TR Volume, V (vph) 192 1933 192 186 1815 326 177 875 130 254 709 96 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 7 2 2 7 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective rear, a 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 4 3 4 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, GP 3.2 3.2 I 3.2 3.2 Phasing Excl. Left EW Perm 03 04 Excl. Left NS Perm 07 08 T i I G= 15.0 G= 62.0 I G= G= G= 18.0 G= 33.0 I G= G= 1 im ng Y= 5 Y= 6 Y= Y= Y= 5 Y= 6 Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 150.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 202 237 196 2254 186 1058 267 847 Lane group capacity, c 227 1985 227 1972 262 763 262 765 v/c ratio, X 0.89 1.13 0.86 1.14 0.71 1.39 1.02 1.11 file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\Robert\Local%20Settings\Temp\s2kF6.tmp 8/19/2003 A-it Detailed Report • • Page 2 of 2 Total green ratio, g/C 0.55 0.41 0.55 0.41 0.37 0.22 0.37. 0.22 Uniform delay, d, 47.7 44.0 47.0 44.0 37.2 58.5 46.1 58.5 Progression factor, PF 1.000 .880 1.000 0.880 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.41 0.50 0.39 0.50 0.27 0.50 0.50 0.50 Incremental delay, d2 32.2 64.3 27.3 71.0 8.6 182.1 60.6 66.0 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 79.9 103.0 74.3 109.7 45.8 40.6 106.7 124.5 Lane group LOS E F E F D F F F Approach delay 101.1 106.8 211.5 120.2 Approach LOS F F F F Intersection delay 124.9 Intersection LOS F HCS2000TM Copyright ® 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1c file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\Robert\Local%20Settings\Temp\s2kF6.tmp 8/19/2003 a ;, Detailed Report Yage 1. of L HCS2000° DE TAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst RP Agency or Co. GCC Date Performed 8/12%2003 Time Period PM PEAK Intersection SR 601OLD COACHMAN Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction FDOT/CLEARWATER Analysis Year 2003 EXISTING CONDITIONS Project ID Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N, 1 3 1 1 3 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Lane group L T R L TR L TR L TR Volume, V (vph) 139 086 92 83 157 525 72 118 56 192 90 98 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 7 2 2 7 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated A) A A A A :A A A A A A A A Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, a 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 4 4 3 4 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0- 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 30 0 50 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, GP 3.2 I 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing Excl. Left EW Perm 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 G= 7.0 G= 74.0 G= G= G= 22.0 G= 1 G= G= Timing Y= 5 Y= 6 Y= Y= Y= 6 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Len th, C = 120.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and L OS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 146 196 65 87 1 2771 76 183 202 198 Lane group capacity, c 165 2990 976 169 2933 156 325 168 315 v/c ratio, X 0.88 0.73 0.07 . 0.51 0.94 J O-49 0.56 1.20 0.63 file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\Robert\Local%20Settings\Temp\s2k39.tmp 8/13/2003 Al '?'?' Detailed Report • Page 2 of 2 • Total green ratio, g/C 0.72 0.62 0.62 0.72 0.62 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 Uniform delay, d, 33.8 16.1 9.2 11.0 21.1 43.9 44.6 49.0 45.2 Progression factor, PF 1.000 0.533 .533 1.000 0.533 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.41 0.29 0.11 0.12 0.46 0.11 0.16 0.50 0.21 Incremental delay, d2 39.2 1.0 0.0 2.7 7.4 2.4 2.2 134.3 4.0 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 72.9 9.6 4.9 13.7 18.7 46.3 46.9 183.3 49.2 Lane group LOS E A A B B D D F O Approach delay 13.3 18.5 46.7 116.9 Approach LOS B B D F Intersection delay 24.3 Intersection LOS C HCS2000TM Copyright C 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1c file://C:\Documents%20and%29Settings\Robert\Local%20Settings\Temp\s2k39.tmp 8/13/2003 A: a 1 1+ ragC "1 Detailed Report HCS2000 DET AILED REPORT General Information Analyst RP Co. Date Agency or Performed 8/12 GCC 2003 Time Period PM PEAK Site Information Intersection SR 60/US 19 RAMPS Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction FDOT/CLEARWATER Analysis Year 2003 EXISTING CONDITIONS Project ID Volume and Timing In u t LT EB TH RT LT WB TH RT LT NB TH RT LT SB TH ' RT Number of lanes, N, 1 3 1 1 3 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 Lane group L T R L T R L R L R Volume, V (vph) 373 1494 467 470 1877 261 557 516 350 331 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 7 2 2 7 2 2 2 2 2 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A A A A Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective reen, e 2.0 L2. 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 4 3 4 4 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmfet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR olumes 0 115 0 65 0 135 0 95 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EB Only Thru & RT WB Only 04 NS Perm 06 G 07 = 08 G= I G= 28.0 I G= 15.0 G= 34. 0 G= G= 23.0 G= Timing Y= 8 Y= 7 Y= 8 Y= Y= 7 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 130.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and,LOS Determination EB WB LT TH VT- LT TH RT LT NB TH RT LT SB TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 393 1573 371 495 1976 206 586 401 368 248 Lane group capacity, 381 1902 621 463 2088 682 607 280 607 280 11.03 0.83 0.60 1.07 0.95 0.30 0.97 1.43 0.61 0.89 file://C:\Documents%2Oand%2OSettings\Robert\Local%2oSettings\Temp\s2k7l.tmp 8/12/2003 A-1S Detailed Report rage /. of v/c ratio, X Total green ratio, g/C 0.22 0.39 0.39 0.26 0.43 0.43 0.18 018 0.18 0.18 Uniform delay, d, 51.0 35.5 31.4 48.0 35.6 24.2 53.1 53.5 49.3 52.2 Progression factor, PF 1.000 .903 0.903 1 1.000 .860 .860 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.50 0.37 0.19 0.50 0.46 0.11 0.47 0.50 0.19 0.41 Incremental delay, d2 54.4 3.2 1.6 61.5 9.9 0.3 28.0 13.8 1.7 26.9 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 105.4 35.2 29.9 109.5 40.5 21.1 81.1 67.3 51.1 79.1 Lane group LOS F D C F D C F F D E Approach delay 46.2 51.7 156.8 62.4 Approach LOS D D F E Intersection delay 66.4 Intersection LOS E HCS2000TM Copyright ® 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved vcmuu y. I. file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\Robert\Locald/o20Settings\Temp\s2k71.tmp 8/12/2003 A-14, Detailed Report Page 1 of 0 0 . HCS2000- DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst RP Agency or Co. GCC Date Performed 8/12/2003 Time Period PM PEAK Intersection SR 601BENIGANS Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction FDOT/CREARWATER Analysis Year 2003 EXISTING CONDITIONS Pro'ect ID Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N, 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Lane group L TR L TR L TR L TR Volume, V (vph) 51 293 16 15 501 20 14 0 22 19 1 93 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 7 2 2 7 2 .2 7 2 2 7 2 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, a 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 4 3 4 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, N. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing W Perm 02 03 04 SB Only NB Only 07 08 82.0 LG= G= G= G= G= 10.0 G= 18.0 I G G Timing = 6 Y= Y= Y= Y= 7 Y= 7 Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 130.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 54 431 16 2654 15 23 20 99 Lane group capacity,c 57 055 57 . 3055 245 219 136 122 v/c ratio, X 0.95 0.80 0.28 0.87 0.06 0.11 0.15 0.81 file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\Robert\Local%20Settings\Temp\s2k52.tmp 8/12/2003 A- 17 Detailed Report Page 2 of 2 0 Total green ratio, g/C 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.14 0.14 0.08 0.08 Uniform delay, d, 22.0 17.8 10.8 19.6 48.7 49.0 56.0 59.1 Progression factor, PF 1.000 0.495 1.000 0.495 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.46 0.34 0.11 0.40 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.35 Incremental delay, d2 100.0 1.5 2.7 3.0 0.1 0.2 0.5 32.4 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay . 122.0 10.3 13.5 12.7 48.8 49.2 56.5 91.5 Lane group LOS F B B B D D E F Approach delay 12.8 12.7 49.0 85.6 Approach LOS B B D F Intersection delay 14.6 Intersection LOS B HCS2000TM Copyright C 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4. lc file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\Robert\Local%20Settings\Temp\s2k52.tmp 8/12/2003 Detailed Reportrage I of HCS20W DE TAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Intersection SR 601PARK PLACE Analyst RP Area Type All other areas Agency or Co. GCC Jurisdiction FDOT/CLEARWATER Date Performed 8/12/2003 2003 EXISTING Time Period PM PEAK Analysis Year CONDITIONS Protect ID Volume and Timing Inpu SB EB WB NB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N 1 3 0 1 3 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 i Lane group L TR L T R L TR L T R Volume, V (vph) 129 2154 51 51 2341 110 43 33 122 126 18 152 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 7 2 2 7 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Pretimed (P) or actuated A A A A A A A A A A A A A) Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 green, e Arrival type, AT 3 4 3 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1. 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unm6t demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR 0 0 0 25 0 0 0 .30 volumes Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, Nm Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing Excl. Left EW Perm 03 04 Excl. Left NS Perm 07 08 G= 11.0 G= 69.0 G= G= G= 6.0 G= 19.0 G= G= Timing Y= 6 Y= 6 Y= Y= Y= 6 Y= 7 Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 130.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 140 396 55 2545 1 92 47 169 137 20 133 Lane group capacity, 207 567 207 2573 840 274 240 208 272 231 10.68 0.93 0.27 0.99 0.11 0.17 0.70 0.66 0.07 0.58 file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\Robert\Local%20Settings\Temp\s2k27.tmp 8/16/2003 Detailed Report Page L of 2 We ratio, X Total green ratio, g/C 0.66 0.53 0.66 0.53 0.53 0.24 0.15 0.24 0.15 0.15 Uniform delay, d, 35.6 28.4 20.6 - 30.1 15.2 38.9 52.8 46.6 47.9 51.7 Progression factor, PF 1.000 0.716 1.000 .716 0.716 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.25 0.45 0.11 0.49 0.11 0.11 0.27 0.23 0.11 0.17 Incremental delay, d2 8.5 7.1 0.7 15.2 0.1 0.3 9.0 7.4 0.1 3.5 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 44.1 27.4 21.3 36.8 10.9 39.2 61.8 54.1 48.0 55.3 Lane group LOS D C C D B D E D D E Approach delay 28.4 35.6 56.9 54.2 Approach LOS C D E D Intersection delay 34.1 Intersection LOS C MCS2006 M Copyright C 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4. lc file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\Robert\Local%20Settings\Temp\s2k27.tmp 8/16/2003 A-? -o Detailed Report Yage 1 of L HCS2000" DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst RP Date Agency or PerforrmCo. ed GCC 8/12/2003 Time Period PM PEAK Intersection SR 601SKY HARBOR Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction FDOT/CLEARWATER Analysis Year 2003 EXISTING CONDITIONS Project ID Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N, 0 3 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane group TR L T LR Volume, V (vph) 365 37 19 452 50 17 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 7 2 2 7 2 2 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A A A Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 4- 3 4 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N N Parking maneuvers, Nm Buses stopping, N. 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EW Perm 0 2 03 04 NB Only 06 07 08 G= 103.0 G= G= 1 G= G= 15.0 G= G= G= Timing Y= 6 Y= Y= Y= Y= 6 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 130.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 730 22 2786 76 Lane group capacity, c 835 63 3841 200 v/c ratio, X 0.71 0.35 0.73 0.38 Total green ratio, g/C 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.12 Uniform delay, di 6.4 3.9 6.6 53.2 file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\Robert\Local%20Settings\Temp\s2k32.tmp 8/16/2003 Detailed Report Page 2 of 2 Progression factor, PF 0.277 1.000 0.277 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.28 0.11 0.29 0.11 Incremental delay, d2 0.6 3.3 0.7 1.2 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 2.4 7.2 2.5 54.4 Lane group LOS A A A D Approach delay 2.4 2.6 54.4 Approach LOS A A D Intersection delay 3.2 Intersection LOS A HCS2000m Copyright C 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4. le file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\Robert\Local%26Setting's\Temp\s2k32.tmp 8/16/2003 Detailed Report Page 1 of 2 HCS2000 DE TAILED REPORT General Information Analyst RP Co. Date Agency or Performed GCC 8/12/2003 Time Period PM PEAK Site Information Intersection SR 601HAMPTON Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction FDOT/CLEARWATER Analysis Year 2003 EXISTING CONDITIONS Project ID Volume and Timin Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N, 1 3 0 1 3 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 Lane group L TR L TR LTR L TR Volume, V (vph) 57 301 24 1 402 217 25 7 6 43 4 44 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 7 2 2 7 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Pretimed (P) or actuated A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 4 3 4 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unm6t demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, Nm Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, GP 3.2 3.2 I 3.2 3.2 Phasing EW Perm G= 101.0 02 G= 03 G= 04 G= NS Perm G= 17.0 06 G= 07 G= 08 G= Timing Y= 6 Y= Y= Y= Y= 6 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 130.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and L EB OS Determination WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 64 612 1 2943 43 48 53 Lane group capacity,c 57 762 70 3734 187 181 214 v/c ratio, X 1.12 0.69 0.01 0.79 0.23 0.27 0.25 file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\Robert\Local%20Settings\Temp\s2k3E.tmp 8/16/2003 /- -2-3 Detailed Report rage zoiz Total green ratio, g/C 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.13 0.13 0.13 Uniform delay, di 14.5 7.0 3.3 8.3 50.6 50.9 50.8 Progression factor, PF 1.000 0.258 1.000 0.258 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.50 0.26 0.11 0.33 0.11 0.11 0.11 Incremental delay, d2 156.9 0.6 0.1 1.2 0.6 0.8 0.6 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 171.4 2.4 3.4 3.3 51.3 51.7 51.4 Lane group LOS F A A A D D D Approach delay 6.4 3.3 51.3 51.5 Approach LOS A A D D Intersection delay 6.0 Intersection LOS A HCS2000TM Copyright C 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Vernon 4. ?c file://C:\Documents%20and%2OSettings\Robert\Local%2OSettings\Temp\s2k3E.tmp 8/16/2003 A-?+ Detailed Report Page 1 of 2 HCS2000" DET AILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst RP Agency or Co. GCC Date Performed 811612003 Time Period PM PEAK Intersection SR 60/MCMULLENBOOTH Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction PIN COI FDOT 2003 EXISTING Analysis Year CONDITIONS Project ID Volume and Timing In u t EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N, 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 Lane group L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume, V (vph) 401 1295 321 285 1511 587 819 263 878 418 30 302 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 7 2 2 7 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, a 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 4 4 3 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 00 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unm2t demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 r 0.0 0.0 _ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 95 o 120 0 180 0 60 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing Excl. Left Thru & RT 03 04 Excl. Left Thru & RT 07 08 G= 11.0 G= 45.0 G= G= G= 17.0 G= 26.0 G= G= Timing Y= 8 Y= 7 Y= Y= Y= 8 Y= 8 Y= Y= Duration of Anal sis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 130.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 422 1363 238 300 1591 492 862 277 735 440 32 255 Lane group capacity, c 290 1678 548 290 1678 548 449 373 317 449 373 317 1 1.46 0.81 0.43 1.03 0.95 0.90 1.92 0.74 2.32 0.98 0.09 0.80 file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\Robert\Local%20Settings\Temp\s2kA0.tmp 8/16/2003 }j4, e7 r°i Detailed Report Page 2 of 2 We ratio, X Total green ratio, !C 0.48 0.35 0.35 0.08 0.35 0.35 0.13 0.20 0.20 0.13 0.20 0.20 Uniform delay, d, 59.5 38.7 32.7 59.5 41.4 40.3 56.5 48.9 52.0 56.3 42.3 49.6 Progression factor, PF 1.000 0.947 0.947 1.000 0.947 .947 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.50 0.35 0.11 0.50 0.46 0.42 0.50 0.30 0.50 0.48 0.11 0.35 Incremental delay, 2 223.0 3.2 0.6 62.1 11.9 17.6 22.1 7.8 603.2 37.1 0.1 14.0 Initial queue delay, 3 Control delay 82.5 39.8 31.5 121.6 51.1 55.7 78.6 56.7 655.2 93.4 42.4 63.6 Lane group LOS F D C F D E F E F F D E Approach delay 89.4 60.9 485.5 80.7 Approach LOS F E F F Intersection delay 184.8 Intersection LOS F HCS2000TM Copyright ® 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1c file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\Robert\Local%20Settings\Temp\s2kA0.tmp 8/16/2003 A - zG Detailed Report Page 1 of L HCS2000 DET AILED REPORT General Information Analyst Co. Date Agency or Performed G 8/1CC1/2003 m Time Period PM PEAK Site Information Intersection DREWBELCHER Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction PIN CO/CLEARWATER Analysis Year 2003 EXISTING CONDITIONS Project ID Volume and Tim'Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, Ni 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 Lane group L TR L TR L TR L TR Volume, V (vph) 291 1205 80 247 476 268 66 1151 154 118 957 63 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Pretimed (P) or actuated A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up lost time, 1, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 4 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 00 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unm6t demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0 r 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR olumes 0 0 oo 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, Nm Buses stopping, N. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing LG= l. Left 20.0 EW Perm G = 43.0 03 G= 04 G Excl. Left G= 10.0 NS Perm G= 51.0 07 G 08 G Timing 6 Y= 7 Y= Y= Y= 6 Y= 7 Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 150.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 313 1382 266 800 71 1404 127 1097 Lane group capacity, c 307 1005 286 960 168 1182 168 1192 v/c ratio, X 1.02 1.38 0.93 0.83 0.42 1.19 10.76 0.92 file://C:\Documents o20and%2OSettings\Robert\Local%2OSettings\Temp\s2k49.tmp 8/16/2003 A,T2.7 Detailed Report Page 2 of z Total green ratio, g/C 0.46 0.29 0.46 0.29 0.45 0.34 0.45 0.34 Uniform delay, d, 42.1 53.5 47.0 50.1 31.8 1 49.5 1 34.8 47.5 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.953 1.000 0.953 Delay calibration, k 0.50 0.50 0.45 0.37 0.11 0.50 0.31 0.44 Incremental delay, d2 56.4 175.1 35.2 6.4 1.7 93.2 17.7 11.5 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 98.6 28.6 82.2 56.5 33.5 140.4 52.5 56.8 Lane group LOS F F F E C F D E Approach delay 204.6 62.9 135.3 56.4 Approach LOS F E F E Intersection delay 125.0 Intersection LOS F HCS2000T M Copyright ® 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved version 4. is file://C:\Documents%20and%2OSettings\Robert\Local%2OSettings\Temp\s2k49.tmp 8/16/2003 A-? ? Detailed Report Page 1 of 2 0 0 HCS2000 DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst RP Co. Date Agency or Performed 8/1GCC1/2003 Time Period PM PEAK Intersection DREW/OLD COACHMAN Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction PIN CO/CLEARWATER 2003 EXISTING Analysis Year CONDITIONS Project ID Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, Ni 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 Lane group L TR L TR L TR L TR Volume, V (vph) 103 1197 117 283 707 189 233 411 137 106 217 51 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, a 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 4 3 4 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmbt demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, N. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, GI) 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing Ex 1. Left EW Perm 03 04' Excl. Left NS Perm 07 08 G= 15.0 G= 46.0 I G= G= G= 10.0 G= 25.0 1 G= G= Timing Y= 6 Y= 6 Y= Y= Y= 6 Y= 6 Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 120.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT, Adjusted flow rate, v 108 1383 298 943 245 577 112 282 Lane group capacity, c 345 1339 283 1314 350 710 227 716 v/c ratio, X 0.31 1.03 1.05 0.72 0.70 0.81 0.49 0.39 file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\Robert\Local%20Settings\Temp\s2k54.tmp 8/16/2003 /? - Za Detailed Report Page L of z Total green rabo,.g/C 0.56 0.38 0.56 0.38 0.34 0.21 0.34 0.21 Uniform delay, d, 15.8 37.0 38.8 31.5 36.0 45.3 29.6 41.0 Progression factor, PF 1.000 0.912 1.000 .912 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.11 0.50 0.50 0.28 0.27 0.35 0.11 0.11 Incremental delay, d2 0.5 33.5 68.1 1.9 6.1 7.2 1.7 0.4 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 16.4 67.2 106.9 30.6 42.1 52.4 31.2 41.3 Lane group LOS B E F C D D C D Approach delay 63.5 48.9 49.4 38.5 Approach LOS E D D D Intersection delay 53.5 Intersection LOS D 77 HCS2000TM Copyright A 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved version 4. is file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\Robert\Local%20Settings\Temp\s2k54.tmp 8/16/2003 A-; Detailed Report Page 1 or HCS2000 DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst RP Agency or Co. GCC Date Performed 811612003 Time Period PM PEAK Intersection DREWAIS 19 Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction FDOR/PIN CO 2003 EXISTING Analysis Year CONDITIONS Project ID Volume and Timing Ino EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, Ni 1 2 1 .1 2 0 1 3 1 1 3 1 Lane group L T R L TR L T R L T R Volume, V (vph) 260 705 475 190 303 180 209 883 382 239 2541 209 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 6 2 2 6 2 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, a 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 3 4 4 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmibt demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 120 0 25 0 1 85 0 45 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, Nm Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0- 1 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing Excl. Left WB Only EW Perm 04 SB Only Thru & RT NB Only 08 G= 24.0 G= 11.0 G= 37.0 G= G= 20.0 G= 66.0 G= 42.0 I ] G= Timing Y= 8 Y= Y= 8 Y= Y_= 8 Y= 8 Y= 8 Y= Duration of Anal sis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 240.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB H RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT Adjusted flow rate, v 274 742 374 200 482 220 35 r 313 252 2675 173 Lane group capacity, 297 546 244 311 672 310 65 23 65 7 148 1916 620 10.92 1.36 1.53 0.64 0.72 0.71 1.28 0.41 1.70 1.40 0.28 file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\Robert\Local%20Settings\Temp\s2k5F.tmp 8/16/2003 ?`a a3 Detailed Report rage z or z . . is 0 We ratio, X Total green ratio, g/C 0.25 0.15 0.15 0.33 0.20 0.17 0.48 0.48 0.08 0.39 0.39 Uniform delay, d, 95.4 101.5 101.5 67.1 89.7 93.3 62.0 39.9 110.0 73.0 49.9 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.791 0.791 1.000 .903 0.903 Delay calibration, k 0.44 0.50 0.50 0.22 0.28 0.27 0.50 0.11 0.50 0.50 0.11 Incremental delay, d2 32.7 173.2 59.4 4.5 3.7 7.4 130.8 0.4 43.4 181.5 0.2 Initial queue delay, 3 Control delay 128.1 74.7 60.9 71.6 93.4 100.6 179.9 32.0 53.4 247.4 45.3 Lane group LOS F F F E F F F C F F D Approach delay 269.0 87.0 162.0 252.9 Approach LOS F F F F Intersection delay 205.4 Intersection LOS F HCS2000TM Copyright ® 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.Ic file://C:\Documentslo20and%20Settings\Robert\Local%20Settings\Temp\s2k5F.tmp 8/16/2003 Detailed Report Page 1 of 2 HCS2000'' DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst RP Agency or Co. GCC Date Performed 811612003 Time Period PM PEAK Intersection DREW/FA/RWOOD/FARK PLACE Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction CLEARWATER Analysis Year 2003 EXISTING CONDITIONS Project ID Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, Ni 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 Lane group L TR L TR L T R L TR Volume, V (vph) 207 580 78 42 405 252 72 172 107 70 34 106 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2- Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, a 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 4 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM - Buses stopping, N. 0 0 0 t 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing Excl. Left EW Perm 03 04 Excl. Left NS Perm 07 08 I G= 10.0 G= 44.0 l G= G= G= 10.0 G= 26.0 G= G= Timing Y= 5 y= 5 Y= Y= Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, =0.25 T Cycle Length, C = 110.0 - - Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 241 765 49 764 84 200 95 81 163 Lane group capacity, c 361 1390 361 1334 412 440 374 381 390 0.67 0.55 0.14 0.57 0.20 0.45 0.25 0.21 0.42 file://C:\Documents%20and%2OSettings\Robert\Local%2OSettings\Temp\s2k75.tmp 8/16/2003 Detailed Report . • Page 2 of 2 We ratio, X Total green ratio, g/C 0.54 0.40 0.54 0.40 0.37 0.24 0.24 0.37 0.24 Uniform delay, d, 15.6 25.4 13.5 25.7 23.1 35.9 34.1 23.2 35.6 Progression factor, PF 1.000 0.894 1.000 0.894 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.24 0.15 0.11 0.17 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 Incremental delay, d2 4.7 0.5 0.2 0.6 0.2 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.7 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 20.2 23.2 13.6 23.6 23.3 36.7 34.5 23.5 36.3 Lane group LOS C C B C C D C C D Approach delay 22.5 23.0 33.2 32.1 Approach LOS C C C C Intersection delay 25.3 Intersection LOS C HCS2000TM Copyright ® 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4. lc file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\Robert\Local%20Settings\Temp\s2k75.tmp 8/16/2003 /k-34 Detailed Report • • Page 1 of 2 HCS2000 DETAILED REPORT General Information Analyst Agency or Co. G CC Date Performed 8116/2003 Time Period PM PEAK Site Information Intersection DREW/HAMPTON Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction CLEARWA TER Analysis Year 2003 EXISTING CONDITIONS Project ID Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, Ni 0 2 0 1 .2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 Lane group TR L T L R Volume, V (vph) 704 53 37 593 106 52 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 2 2 2 2 2 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 4 3 4 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.600 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike'/ RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N N Parking maneuvers, Nm Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing WB Only EW Perm 03 04 NB Only 06 07 08 G= 14.0 G= 52.0 G= G= G= 24.0 G= G= G= Timing Y= 6 Y= 6 Y= Y= Y= 8 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 110.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and L EB OS Determination WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 823 40 645 115 57 Lane group capacity, c 1 1655 477 2316 386 345 v/c ratio, X 0.50 0.08 0.28 0.30 0.17 Total green ratio, g/C 0.47 0.65 0.65 0.22 0.22 Uniform delay, di 20.0 7.7 8.0 1 36.0 34.9 file://C:\Documents%20and%2OSettings\Robert\Local%2OSettings\Temp\s2k8A.tmp 8/16/2003 Detailed Report 9 • Page L or 2 Progression factor, PF 0.806 1.000 0.424 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 Incremental delay, d2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.2 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 16.4 7.8 3.5 36.4 35.1 Lane group LOS B A A D D Approach delay 16.4 3.7 36.0 Approach LOS B A D Intersection delay 13.2 Intersection LOS B HCS2000TU Copyright ® 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved version q. i G file://C:\Documents%20and%2OSettings\Robert\Local%2OSettings\Temp\s2k8A.tmp 8/16/2003 Detailed Report 9 • Page 1 of L HCS2000 DET AILED REPORT General Information Analyst Agency or Co. G CC Date Performed 811612003 Time Period PM PEAK Site Information Intersection DREW/MCMULLEN-BOOTH Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction PIN CO/CLWTR 2003 EXISTING Analysis Year CONDITIONS Pro'ect 10 Volume and Timing In ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, Ni 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 3 0 1 3 0 Lane group L LT R L TR L TR L TR Volume, V (vph) 430 45 189 50 54 19 99 687 46 25 1909 293 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up lost time, I1 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 . 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective teen, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 4 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unm6t demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 1 50 0 0 0 0 0 50 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, N. Buses stopping, N. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing WB Only EB Only 03 04 Excl. Left NB Only Thru & RT 08 L: 15.0 G= 30.0 G G= G= 11.0 G= 10.0 G= 128.0 G= Timing 6 Y= 6 Y= Y= Y= 7 Y= 0 Y= 7 Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Len th, C = 220.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and L EB OS Detennination WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 453 1 47 146 53 77 104 3929 26 265 Lane group capacity, c 241 254 216 121 1 122 225 3184 89 2909 v/c ratio, X 1.88 0.19 0.68 0.44 0.63 0.46 1.23 0.29 0.78 file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\Robert\Local%20Settings\Temp\s2k95.tmp 8/16/2003 Detailed Report . 9 • Page 2 of 2 Total green ratio, g/C 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.07 0.07 0.13 0.63 0.05 0.58 Uniform delay, d, 95.0 84.2 90.4 85 99.8 89.0 41.0 100.7 35.2 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000, 1.000 E 1.00 0 1.000 0.710 1.000 0.617 Delay calibration, k 0.50 0.11 0.25 0.11 0.21 0.11 0.50 0.11 0.33 Incremental delay, d2 11.2 0.4 8.1 2.5 10.1 1.5 108.2 1.8 1.4 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 506.2 84.5 98.5 101.0 109.9 90.5 137.3 102.6 23.1 Lane group LOS F F F F F F F F C Approach delay 383.4 106.3 136.1 24.0 Approach LOS F F F C intersection delay 121.9 intersection LOS F HCS2000TM Copyright ® 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved version a. is file://C:\Documents%20and%20Scl-ttings\Robert\Local%20Settings\`1'emp\s2k95.tmp 8/16/2003 Al -?:"B Detailed Report • • Page 1 of 2 W t7K AW- Impizolvellit5WT; HCS20W DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst RP Agency or Co. GCC Date Performed 8119103 Time Period PM PEAK Intersection SR 601BENIGANS Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction FDOT/CREARWATER Analysis Year 2008 FUTURE CONDITIONS Project ID Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N, 1 3 0 1 3 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 Lane group L TR L TR R L TR Volume, V (vph) 51 498 198 66 860 20 108 19 1 122 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 7 2 2 7 2 2 2. 7 2 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0:95. Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A, A A A A A A A Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective reen, a 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 4 3 4 3 3 3 Unit extension., UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, P 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 G= 92.0 I G= G= l G= I G= 25.0 G= 1 G= G= Timing Y= 6 Y= Y= y= Y= 7 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 130.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 54 837 69 3032 114 20 129 Lane group capacity, c 57 405 57 3428 310 340 .. 305 v/c ratio, X 0.95 0.83 1.21 0.88 0.37 a06 0.42 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.19 0.19 0.19 file://C: Documents%20and%2OSettings\Robert\Local%2OSettings\Temp\s2k29.ttnp 8/20/2003 Detailed Report • • Page 2 of 2 Total green ratio, g/C Uniform delay, di 16.9 13.5 19.0 14.8 45.6 42.9 46.2 Progression factor, PF 1.000 0.222 1.000 0.222 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.46 0.37 0.50 0.41 0.11 0.11 0.11 Incremental delay, d2 100.0 1.9 186.8 3.1 0.7 0.1 0.9 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 116.8 4.9 05.8 6.4 46.4 43.0 47.1 Lane group LOS F J A F A D D D Approach delay 7.0 10.8 46.4 46.6 proach LOS A 8 D D ersection delay F 10.6 Intersection LOS 8 HCS2000TM Copyright ® 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1c file://C:\Documents%20and%2OSettings\Robert\Local%2OSettings\Temp\s2k29.tmp 8/20/2003 Detailed Report 0 • Page 1 of 2 1Nr7N Mii`L rmPR? .r??r? r 1 HCS2000- DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst RP Agency or Co. GCC Date Performed 8119103 Time Period PM PEAK Intersection SR 601PARK PLACE Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction FDOT/CLEARWATER Analysis Year 2008 FUTURE CONDITIONS Project ID Volume and Timing Inp EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N, 1 3 0 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Lane group L TR L T R L T R L T R Volume, V (vph) 133 238 254 166 457 112 307 39 111 157 21 182 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 7 2 2 7 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Peak-hour factor,. PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Pretimed (P) or actuated A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, a 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 4 3 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped I Bike / RTOR olumes 0 0 0 45 0 45 0 60 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing Excl. Left EW Perm 03 04 Excl. Left NS Perm 07 08 I G= 11.0 G= 71.0 G= G= G= 6.0 G= 17.0 G= G= Timing Y= 6 Y= 6 Y= Y= Y= 6 Y= 7 Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 130.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 145 2709 180 2671 73 334 42 72 171 23 133 Lane group capacity, 207 619 207 2648 865 252 244 207 249 244 207 v/c ratio, X 0.70 1.03 0.87 1.01 0.08 1.33 0.17 0.35 0.69 0.09 0.64 file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\Robert\Local%20Settings\Temp\s2kI3.tmp 8/20/2003 C - tl Detailed Report • 0 Page 2 of 2 Total green ratio, g/C 0.68 0.55 0.68 0.55 0.55 0.22 0.13 0.13 0.22 0.13 0.13 Uniform delay, di 38.0 29.5 43.0 29.5 14.0 52.6 50.2 51.5 48.0 49.7 53.6 Progression factor, PF 1.000 0.689 1.000 0.689 0.689 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.27 0.50 0.40 0.50 0.11 0.50 0.11 0.11 0.26 0.11 0.22 Incremental delay, d2 10.1 27.2 30.4 19.6 0.0 171.3 0.3 1.0 7.7 0.2 6.6 Initial queue delay, 3 1 Control delay 48.0 47.5 73.5 39.9 9.7 23.9 50.6 52.5 55.7 49.9 60.3 Lane group LOS D D E D A F D D E D E Approach delay 47.6 41.3 180.1 57.1 Approach LOS D D F E Intersection delay 54.3 Intersection LOS D HCS2000TM Copyright ® 2000 University of Florida, All Rigbts Reserved Version 4.1c file://C:\Documents%20and%2OSettings\Robert\Local%2OSettings\Temp\s2kl3.tmp 8/20/2003 rr- 64 Detailed Report 46 0 Page 1 of 2 HCS2000 DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst RP Agency or Co. GCC Date Performed 8119103 Time Period PM PEAK Intersection DREWIFA/RWOOD/PARK PLACE Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction CLEARWATER Analysis Year 2008 FUTURE CONDITIONS Project ID Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N, 1 2 0 1 2 0- 1 1 1 1 1 0 Lane group L TR L TR L T R L TR Volume, V (vph) 207 580 81 43 405 252 120 174 129 70 35 106 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A 1 A A A A A A Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective teen, a 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 4 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Ob 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing Excl. Left EW Perm 03 04 Excl. Left NS Perm 07 08 I G= 10.0 G= 44.0 G= G= G= 10.0 G= 26.0 G= G= Timing Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 110.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Detenmination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 241 768 50 764 140 202 121 81 164 Lane group capacity, c 361 1390 360 1334 411 440 374 379 391 v/c ratio, X 0.67 0.55 0.14 0.57 0.34 0.46 0.32 0.21 0.42 file:IIC:\Documents%20and%20Settings\Robert\Local%20Settings\Temp\s2kD6.tmp 8/19/2003 Detailed Report 46 0 Page 2 of 2 Total green ratio, g/C 0.54 0.40 0.54 0.40 0.37 0.24 0.24 0.37 0.24 Uniform delay, di 15.6 25.4 13.5 25.7 23.9 36.0 34.7 23.2 35.6 Progression factor, PF 1.000 0.894 1.000 1 0.894 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.24 0.15 0.11 0.17 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 Incremental delay, d2 4.7 0.5 0.2 0.6 0.5 0.8 0.5 0.3 0.7 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 20.2 23.2 13.7 23.6 24.4 36.7 35.2 23.5 36.3 Lane group LOS C C B C C D D C D Approach delay 22.5 23.0 32.6 32.1 Approach LOS C C C C Intersection delay 25.4 Intersection LOS C HCS2000TM Copyright A 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1c fide://C:Owments%20and%2OSettings\Robert\Local°/o20Settings\Temp\s2kD6.tmp 8/19/2003 C-- t 49 ,D 0 0 EXHIBIT "D" PARK PLACE DRI SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION DETERMINATION CHART TYPE OF LAND USE CHANGE CATEGORY PROPOSED PLAN ORIGINAL PLAN PREVIOUS.D.O. CHANGE AND DATE Attraction/Recreation # Parking Space NIA NIA NIA # Spectators # Seats Site locational changes Acreage, including drainage, ROW, easements, etc. # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA representations Airports Runway (length) NIA NIA N/A Runway (strength) Terminal (gross sq. ft.) # Parking Spaces # Gates Apron Area (gross sq. ft.) Site locational changes Airport Acreage, including drainage, ROW, easements, etc. # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA representations Hospitals # Beds NIA NIA NIA # Parking Spaces Building (gross sq. ft.) Site locational changes Acreage, including drainage, ROW, F easements, etc. 0 # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions OCT 10 2003 F ADA representations i 0 • PARK PLACE DRi SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION DETERMINATION CHART (continued) TYPE OF LAND USE CHANGE CATEGORY PROPOSED PLAN ORIGINAL PLAN PREVIOUS D.O. CHANGE AND DATE Industrial Acreage, including drainage, ROW, easements, etc. # Parking Spaces Buildings (gross sq. ft.) No change -0- 200,000 SF GFA (12119/91- Ord. #5142.91) # Employees Chemical storage (barrels and lbs.) Site locational changes # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA representations Mining Operations Acreage mined (year) N/A NIA NIA Water Withdrawal (Gal/day) Size of Mine (acres), including drainage, ROW, easements, etc. Site locational changes # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA representations Office Acreage, including drainage, ROW, easements, etc. Building (gross sq. ft.) No change 1,103,000 SF GFA 803,000 SF GFA (12/19/91-Ord. #5142.91) # Parking Spaces 795,520 SF GFA (1/19195-Ord. #5722-95) # Employees 404,693 SF GFA (211/01-Ord. #6678-01) Site locational changes # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA representations -2- • PARK PLACE DRI SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION DETERMINATION CHART (confinuecf) TYPE OF LAND USE CHANGE CATEGORY PROPOSED PLAN ORIGINAL PLAN PREVIOUS D.O. CHANGE AND DATE Petroleum/Chem. Storage Storage Capacity (barrels and/or lbs.) NIA N/A NIA Distance to Navigable Waters (ft.) Site locational changes Facility Acreage, including drainage, ROW, easements, etc. # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA representations Ports (Marinas) # boats, wet storage N/A N/A N/A # boats, dry storage Dredge and fill (cu. yds.) Petroleum storage (gals.) Site locational changes Port Acreage, including drainage, ROW, easements, etc. # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA representations Residential # dwelling units No change -0- 390 (2!1!01-0rd. #6678-01) Type of dwelling units # lots Acreage, including drainage, ROW, easements, etc. Site locational changes # External Vehicle Trips . D.O. conditions ADA representations -3- 0 0 PARK PLACE DR! SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION DETERMINATION CHART (continued) TYPE OF LAND USE CHANGE CATEGORY PROPOSED PLAN ORIGINAL PLAN PREVIOus D.O. CHANGE AND DATE Wholesale, Retail, Service Acreage, including drainage, ROW, easements, etc. Floor Space (gross sq. ft.) No change 150,000 SF GFA 81,120 SF GFA (211101-Ord. #6678-01) # Parking Spaces # Employees Site locational changes # External Vehicle Trips D.O. Conditions ADA representations -0- Ord. # 6107-96 set forth conversion Hotel/Motel # Rental Units factor to allow Parcel 4 commercial Floor Space (gross sq. ft.) No change development to convert to hotel. # Parking Spaces Ord. #6678-01 set forth conversion # Employees factor to allow Parcel 6 office Site locational changes development to convert to hotel Acreage, including drainage, ROW, easements, etc. # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA representations R.V. Park Acreage, including drainage, ROW, NIA NIA NIA easements, etc. # Parking Spaces Buildings (gross sq. ft.) # Employees Site locational changes # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA Representations -4- 0 • PARK PLACE DRI SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION DETERMINATION CHART (continued) TYPE OF LAND USE CHANGE CATEGORY PROPOSED PLAN ORIGINAL PLAN PREVIOUS D.O. CHANGE AND DATE Open Space Acreage No change proposed (All natural and Site locational changes vegetated non Type of open space impervious surfaces)(2) D.O. conditions ADA representations Preservation, Buffer or Acreage No change proposed Special Protection Areas Site locational changes Development of site proposed D.O. conditions ADA representations 10/16/0312:11 PM d-2 44384.107090 #300082 v1 - Bausch&Lomb/Park Place 2003 Sub Dev Chart -5- ORDINANCE NO.7215-03---------------------------------------- --------- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 3205-83, AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE NO. 3287-83, ORDINANCE NO. 5142-91, ORDINANCE NO. 5722-95, ORDINANCE NO. 6107-96 AND ORDINANCE NO. 6678-01, A DEVELOPMENT ORDER ISSUED PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 380, FLORIDA STATUTES, FOR PARK PLACE, A DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT; PROVIDING FINDINGS OF FACT; PROVIDING CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; EXTENDING THE BUILDOUT DATE, EXTENDING THE EXPIRATION DATE OF THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER; UPDATING MAP H. THE MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN; DETERMINING THAT SAID AMENDMENT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE ADOPTED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; PROVIDING FOR PROPER NOTICE OF PROPOSED ENACTMENT; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS ORDINANCE. WHEREAS, on September 1, 1983, the City Commission adopted Ordinance No. 3205-83 (the "Development Order") which ordinance constitutes a development order for Park Place, a development of regional impact, affecting the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein (the "Development'); and WHEREAS, on October 20, 1983, the City Commission adopted Ordinance No. 3287-83, an amendment to the Development Order and readopted Ordinance No. 3287-83 on December 8, 1983; and WHEREAS, on December 19, 1991, the City Commission adopted Ordinance . No. 5142-91, an Amendment to the Development Order; and WHEREAS, on January 19, 1995, the City Commission adopted Ordinance No. 5722-95, an Amendment to the Development Order; and WHEREAS, on November 21, 1996, the City Commission adopted Ordinance No. 6107-96, an Amendment to the Development Order; and WHEREAS, on February 1, 2001, the City Commission adopted Ordinance No. 6678-01, an Amendment to the Development Order; and WHEREAS, on September 10, 2003, Bausch and Lomb Incorporated and Park Place Land, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership, the owners of certain undeveloped areas of the Development, filed an application entitled "Notification of a Proposed Change to a Previously Approved Development of Regional Impact ("DR[") pursuant to Subsection 0 0 380.06(19), Florida Statutes" (the "NOPC") with the City of Clearwater (the "City"), with copies provided to the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council (the "TBRPC") and the Florida Department of Community Affairs (the "DCA"); and WHEREAS, the NOPC proposes to amend the Development Order tom extend the build-out date by five years to December 31, 2008 and (ii) extend by expiration date of the Development Order by five years to December 31. 2008 (the 'Proposed Changes"); and WHEREAS, the Proposed Changes, combined with previous amendments to the Development Order, is presumed to create a substantial deviation, pursuant to Subsection 380.06(19), Florida Statutes; and WHEREAS, the NOPC has satisfactorily addressed all regional issues related to the Development and the presumption of a substantial deviation has been rebutted; and WHEREAS, the City Commission, as the governing body of the local government having jurisdiction pursuant to Chapter 380, Florida Statutes, is authorized and empowered to consider applications for proposed changes to previously approved DRIs; and WHEREAS, the public notice requirements of Chapter 380, Florida Statutes, and the City have been satisfied; and WHEREAS, the City Commission has reviewed the NOPC, as well as all related testimony and evidence submitted by each party and members of the general public. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. Introduction - This Ordinance shall constitute an amendment to the Park Place Development Order as previously amended. Section 2. Findings - The City Commission, having received all related comments, testimony and evidence submitted by each party and members of the general public, finds that there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact: A. The Park Place Development Order, as adopted by Ordinance No. 3205- 83, and amended by Ordinances No. 3287-83, No. 5142-91, No. 5722-95, 6107-96 and 6678-01, is a valid final development order within the provisions of Section 163.3167(8), Florida Statutes, affecting the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein. 2 • • B. Bausch and Lomb Incorporated and Park Place Land, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership, the owners of undeveloped portions of the DR[, have proposed that the Development Order be amended to extend the build-out date by five years to December 31, 2008. C. A comprehensive review of the impacts generated by the Proposed Changes,_together with all previous amendments, has been conducted by-.---i Deleted: Change the City's departments, the TBRPC and the DCA. D. The Proposed phanges&re not located in an area of critical state concern 1 Deleted: Change -------------------------------------------------------- designated as such pursuant to Section 380.05, Florida Statutes (1993). ?I Deleted: is E. The Proposed Changes, together with all previous amendments, dq not L Deleted: es increase the external traffic impact of the development, nor does it create additional impacts on other public facilities, including water, wastewater, drainage, solid waste, recreation and mass transit, from the original projections set forth in the Application for Development Approval ("ADA"). F. The Proposed Changes hereby approved pre _determined not to be a i Deleted: is - - ------------------------- substantial deviation to the Development Order. Section 3. Conclusions of Law - The City Commission, having made the above findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law: A. The Development as built to date is consistent with the local comprehensive plan and local land development regulations under which it was developed. B. The Development as modified herein, and as depicted on the Revised Map H, Master Plan, attached hereto as Exhibit "B," will not unreasonably interfere with the achievement of the objectives of the adopted state land development plan applicable to the area. C. The Proposed Changes are. ,consistent with the local land development Deleted: is - ------------------------------------------- regulations currently in effect. D. The Proposed Changes, together with all previous amendments, dq not ---- Deleted: e5 create a reasonable likelihood of additional impact or any type of regional impact not previously reviewed by the TBRPC and DCA, over those treated under the Development Order. The Proposed _Changes, therefore, dq not Deleted: Change constitute a "substantial deviation" from the Development Order, pursuant Deleted: es to Chapter 380.06, Florida Statutes. The Proposed Changes are exempt ------ Deleted: is from the provisions of Ordinance No. 4983-90, City of Clearwater and the Park Place DRI remains vested thereunder. 0 0 E. Nothing herein shall limit or modify the rights originally approved by the Development Order or the protection afforded under Section 163.3167(8), Florida Statutes, except to the extent that specific rights and protections are limited or modified by the Proposed Changes to the Develo ment Order as Deleted: change approved by this ordinance. F. The Proposed Changes-Ore within the threshold guidelines of Ordinance Deleted: change -------------------------------------------- No. 4983-90 of the City, relating to determinations of vested development Deleted: is rights, and the Park Place DRI remains vested thereunder. G. These proceedings have been duly conducted pursuant to applicable law and regulations, and based upon the record in these proceedings, the various departments of the City, Bausch and Lomb Incorporated, Park Place Land, Ltd., and other owners of the Development are authorized to approve/conduct development as described herein. H. The review by the City, the TBRPC, and other participating agencies and interested citizens reveals that impacts are adequately addressed pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 380, Florida Statutes. Section 4. Order - Having made the above findings of fact and drawn the above conclusions of law, it is ordered that the Development Order be amended as follows: A. The Conceptual Plan described in Sections 4.A. and U. of the Development Order is amended to be as shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein. All references to the Conceptual Plan'set forth in the Development Order shall refer to the Amended Conceptual Plan attached hereto as Exhibit "B." B. The build-out date is hereby extended to December 31, 2008. C. Notwithstanding any provision in the Development Order to the contrary -------- Formatted: Indent: Left: ? the Development Order shall remain in effect until December 31. 2008. "a"ging: 0.9" P The amendments stated herein, together with all previous amendments, do -.- (Deleted: C - -------- -- - - not constitute a substantial deviation, pursuant to Chapter 380.06, Florida Statutes. g....... Nothing- herein shall limit or modify the rights originally approved by_ the .---Deleted: D Development Order or the protection afforded under Section 163.3167(8), Florida Statutes, except to the extent that specific rights and protections are limited or modified by the proposed amendments to the Development Order as approved by this ordinance. 4 • • The City Clerk shall send copies _of this ordinance, within five (5)_ days after__ --(Deleted: E passage of this ordinance on second reading to Bausch and Lomb Incorporated, Park Place Land, Ltd., DCA and TBRPC. G. This ordinance shall be deemed rendered upon transmittal of copies hereof [eleted_F__ -? to the TBRPC and the DCA. ,i. Notice of adoption of this ordinance shall be _recorded_ by the Developer in Deleted: c -------------------------------------------- --------------------- the public records of Pinellas County, Florida, as provided in Section 380.06, Florida Statutes. Section 5. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect when filed as provided by law, unless this ordinance is appealed, in which event this ordinance shall not take effect until such appeal has been decided. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Brian Aungst Mayor - Commissioner Attest: Cynthia E. Goudeau City Clerk Approved as to form and correctness: Pamela K. Akin City Attorney Exhibit "A!'- Legal Description Exhibit "B" - Revised Map H ' 10/16/0312:30P M d-1 44384.107090 #300081 v1 - Bausch&Lomb/Park Place 2003 Ordinance 04:32 PM 5 EXHIBIT "A" TO ORDINANCE NO. 47215-03 ( Deleted: --? LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PARK PLACE Commence at the center of Section 17, Township 29 South, Range 16 East Pinellas FF nnatted: Font: (Default) Anal, 12 County, Florida and go S 89°46'01" W, 660.00 feet, along the South boundary of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17 (the East-West centerline of said Section 17;) thence N 00°19'21" W. 50.00 feet, to a point on the North right-of-way line of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard - State Road 60 for a POINT OF BEGINNING: thence, following said North right-of-way line, S 89°46'01" W, 58.49 feet; thence N 00°13'59" W 10.00 feet; thence S 89°46'01" W. 1319.21 feet: thence, leaving said North right-of-way line N 01°04'04" E 599.99 feet; thence S 89°46'01" W 198.43 feet; thence N 00°52'21" E 554.70 feet thence S 89°54'49" W. 400.06 feet, to a point on the East right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 19; thence, following said East right-of-way line, N 01 °04'04" E. 28.15 feet: thence along a curve to the right that has a radius of 192.00 feet, an arc length of 72.82 feet a chord length of 72.39 feet, a chord bearing of N 11°56'04" E. thence N 22°47'58" E. 11.93 feet; thence along a curve to the left that has a radius of 238.00 feet, an arc length of 16.13 feet, a chord length of 16.13 feet, a chord bearing of N 20°51'27" E to a point on the North boundary of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17; thence, leaving said East right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 19, N 89°54'49" E 1222.19 feet, along the North boundary of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17 to the Southwest corner of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17; thence N 00°22'28" E, 1337.33 feet, along the West boundary of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 17 to the Northwest corner of said Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4: thence S 89°56'11" E, 1312.06 feet, alonq the North boundary of said Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 to a point on the West right-of-wav line. of Hampton Road - County Road 144; thence S W19'21" E. 2337.71 feet, along said West right-of-way line; thence S 89°46'01" W, 627.00 feet; thence S 00°10'21" E, 280.00 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING, containinq 99.133 acres, more or less. Formatted Justiled 0 0 EXH I BIT "B" TO ORDINANCE NO. 7215,03 Deleted: PARK PLACE DRI - MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN, MAP H REVISED AUGUST 22, 2003 N 0 250 500 EXISTING ACCESS g 0 O1 O= _ OFFICE 82,179 SF PARCEL 8 (82.179 SF EXISTING) PARCEL 1 PARCEL 3 MULTI-FAMIL 234 D.U. (274 MULTI-FAMLLY D.U. EXIST) LIGHT INDUSTRIAL 200,000 SF (IG0.000 SF EXISTING) I `EXISTING ACCESS NATURAL AREA LTI-FAMILY e(U151 ARCEL 2 156 D.U. MULThFAMLLY O.U. EIIST) Q OFFICE 101,900 SF PARCEL 4 (101,900 SF 0057ING) COMMERICAL (RETAIL) 55,278 SF PARCEL 7 (85.278 SF EXIST ON PARCELS 7 AND 9) COMMERCIAL PARCEL 10 ( w SF EXISTING) GULF-TO-BAY BOULEVARD PARCEL 5 PARCEL 6 (120,580 0 SF OFFICE EXISTING) (100.000 SF OFFICE PLANNED) 220,56 COMMERCIAL PARCEL 11 (14.579 SF EMMO) LAND USE EXISTING PLANNED TOTAL RETAIL/ COMMERICAL 81,120 SF 0 81,120 SF OFFICE 304,639 S 100,000 S 404,639 SF LT. INDUSTRIAL 100,000 SF 100,000 SF 200,000 SF MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 390 DU 0 DU 390 DU TOTAL 485,759 SF 200,000 SFJ 685,759 SF 390 DU 0 DU 390 DU 0 x 0 0. a x NOTE 1. THE PROPOSED AMOUNT OF SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR INDIVIDUAL UNDEVELOPED PARCELS ARE BASED ON BEST AVAILABLE MARKET INFORMATION AND ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE. FUTURE THE AMOUNT OF TOTAL DEVELOPMENT, HOWEVER WILL NOT EXCEED THE AMOUNT OF DEVELOPMENT APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER. ACCESS 2. THAT PORTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT THAT REMAINS TO BE DEVELOPED IS REFERRED TO AS THE 'PLANNED DEVELOPMENT". THE BUILD-OUT DATE FOR THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND FOR THE TOTAL PROJECT IS DECEMBER 31, 2008. .3. CONVERSION RATES OF 1,000 SQUARE FEET OF LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT TO 633 SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT ARE HEREBY ESTABLISHED ON PARCEL 1 AS APPROVED BY ORDINANCE #5722-95 . 4. ANY MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WILL BE LIMITED TO PARCELS 2, 3, 6 AND 8. ' 5. PARCELS IS PLANNED FOR 100,000 SF OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT. CONVERSION RATES 0 1,000 SF OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT TO 2.40 MULTI-FAMILY UNITS WITH A MAXIMUM OF 24 UNITS, OR 1,000 SF OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT TO 2.44 HOTEL ROOMS WITH A MAXIMUM 01 244 UNITS ARE HEREBY ESTABLISHED FOR PARCEL 8 AS APPROVED BY ORDINANCE 6678-01. 'L- COMMERCIAL 25,842 SF (RETAIL) (25,842 SF EXISTING) - PARK PLACE DRI - MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN MAP H Gulf Coast Consultants, Inc. DATE: FIGURE: Land Development Consulting REVISED: AUGUST 22, 2003 DRAWN BY: RAW i • E. D. ARMSTRONG III BRUCE H. BOKOR JOHN R. BONNER, SR.* GUY M. BURNS JONATHAN S. COLEMAN MICHAEL T. CRONIN ELIZABETH J. DANIELS BECKY FERRELL-ANTON COLLEEN M.FLYNN JOHNSON, POPE, BOKok, RUPPEL & BURNS, P.A. ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW MARION HALE SCOTT C. ILGENFRITZ FRANK R. JAKES TIMOTHY A. JOHNSON, JR. SHARON E. KRICK ROGER A. LARSON JOHN R. LAWSON, JR* LEANNE LETIZE MICHAEL G. LITTLE MICHAEL C. MARKHAM STEPHANIE T. MARQUARDT ZACHARY D. MESSA A.R. "CHARLIE" NEAL TROY J. PERDUE F. WALLACE POPE, JR. ROBERT V. POTTER, JR. AUDREY B. RAUC14WAY DARRYL R. RICHARDS PETER A. RIVELLINI DENNIS G. RUPPEL* CHARLES A. SAMARKOS PHILIP M. SHASTEEN JOAN M. VECCHIOLI STEVEN H. WEINBERGER JOSEPH J. WEISSMAN *OF COUNSEL PLEASE REPLY TO CLEARWATER FILE NO. 37413.95209 September 10, 2003 Via Hand Delivery Ms. Gina L. Clayton Long Range Planning Manager 0 City of Clearwater Planning & Development Services 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 Re: Park Place DRI Dear Gina: ? -? ? 1 '`. 2003 On behalf of Bausch & Lomb Incorporated and Park Place Land, Ltd., I am submitting with this letter 15 sets of an application for Notification of Proposed Change ("NOPC") to the Park Place DRI. Also enclosed is a review fee check, payable to the City of Clearwater, in the amount of $500.00. The purpose of this NOPC is to extend the buildout date of the DRI by five years to December 31, 2008. By copy of this letter, I am forwarding the application to the appropriate reviewing agencies and consultants. CLEARWATER OFFICE TAMPA OFFICE 911 CHESTNUT ST. 100 N. TAMPA ST. POST OFFICE BOX 1368 SUITE 1800 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33757-1368 POST OFFICE BOX 1100 TELEPHONE: (727) 461-1818 TAMPA, FLORIDA 33601-1100 TELECOPIER (727) 462-0365 TELEPHONE: (813) 225-2500 TELECOPIER (813) 2237118 JOHNSON, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, P.A. ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW Ms. Gina L. Clayton September 10, 2003 Page 2 appreciate your efforts to accelerate review of this NOPC so that, hopefully, the development order amendment can be accomplished before year end. Please do not hesitate to contact my legal assistant, Jayne Sears, or me to discuss the NOPC application. Very truly yours, T thy A. Johnson, Jr. TAJ/js encls. cc w/encl: Mr. John Meyer, TBRPC Ms. Marina Pennington, DCA Mr. Al Navaroli, Pinellas County Mr. Ramon Solis, Pinellas County Mr. Kent Fast, FDOT Mr. George Deakin, Kimley-Horn & Assoc. Ms. Maura Minges, Bausch & Lomb Mr. Nick Shackleton, Park Place Land Robert Pergolizzi, AICP #300623 v1 0 • STATE OF FLORIDA RPM-BSP-PROPCHANGE-1 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS DIVISION OF RESOURCE PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT BUREAU OF RESOURCE MANAGEMENT 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, Fl, 32399-2100 (850) 488-8466 NOTIFICATION OF A PROPOSED CHANGE TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT (DRI) SUBSECTION 380.06(19), FLORIDA STATUTES Subsection 380.06(19), Florida Statutes, requires that submittal of a proposed change to a previously approved DRI be made to the local government, the regional planning council, and the state land planning agency according to this form. 1. I, TIMOTHY A. JOHNSON, JR., the undersigned authorized representative of BAUSCH AND LOMB INCORPORATED and PARK PLACE LAND, LTD. (collectively, "Applicant"), hereby give notice of a proposed change to a previously approved Development of Regional Impact ("DRI") in accordance with Subsection 380.06(19), Florida Statutes. In support thereof, the Applicant submits the following information concerning the PARK PLACE DRI development, which information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I have submitted today, under separate cover, copies of this completed notification to the City of Clearwater, Florida (the "City"), to the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council ("TBRPC"), and to the Bureau of Resource Management, Department of Community Affairs ("DCA"). (Dat) Timothy A. John on; Jr. Authorized Representative for Bausch and Lomb Incorporated and Park Place Land, Ltd. • 2. 3. 4. C, Applicant: Bausch and Lomb Incorporated One Bausch & Lomb Place Rochester, NY 14604 Contact: Maura R. Minges Phone (585) 338-6583 Fax: (585) 338-8188 Park Place Land, Ltd. c/o Clinton International Group, Inc. Clinton Commercial Group, Inc. 3225 Aviation Avenue, Suite 700 Coconut Grove, FL 33133 Contact: Nick Shackleton Phone (305) 860-8188 Fax: (305) 860-8196 Authorized Agent: Timothy A. Johnson, Jr., Esquire Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, P.A. 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, Florida 33756 Phone: (727) 461-1818 Fax: (727) 462-0365 Location of approved DRI and proposed change: A portion of Section 17, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida, more particularly described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein (the "Property"). 5. Provide a complete description of the proposed change. Include any proposed changes to the plan of development, phasing, additional lands, commencement date, build-out date, development order conditions and requirements, or to the representations contained in either the development order or the Application for Development Approval. The Applicant requests a five-year extension of the build-out date from December 31, 2003 to December 31, 2008. A Park Place NOPC Traffic Analysis, dated September, 2003, prepared by Gulfcoast Consulting, Inc. ("Traffic Analysis"), is attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and incorporated herein. As evidenced by the Traffic Analysis, the proposed extension does not necessitate additional roadway improvements beyond those set forth in the approved Development Order. Indicate such changes on the project master site plan, supplementing with other detailed maps, as appropriate. Additional information may be requested by the Department or any reviewing agency to clarify the nature of the change or the resulting impacts. -2- 0 0 The revised conceptual plan for Park Place, dated August 22, 2003, ("Map H") is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "C." There are no changes requested to Map H; however Map H has been updated to reflect the current amount of existing development. 6. Complete the attached Substantial Deviation Determination Chart for all land use types approved in the development. If no change is proposed or has occurred, please indicate no change. The Substantial Deviation Determination Chart is Exhibit "D" attached hereto and incorporated herein. 7. List all the dates and resolution numbers (or other appropriate identification numbers) of all modifications or amendments to the originally approved DRI development order that have been adopted by the local government, and provide a brief description of the previous changes (i.e. any information not already addressed in the Substantial Deviation Chart). . The DRI Development Order was originally adopted by the City of Clearwater, Florida, as Ordinance No. 3205-83 on September 1, 1983, amended by Ordinance No. 3287-83, adopted October 20, 1983, and readopted December 8, 1983, amended by Ordinance No. 5142-91, adopted December 19, 1991, amended by Ordinance No. 5722-95, adopted January 19, 1995, amended by Ordinance No. 6107-96, adopted November 21, 1996, and amended by Ordinance No. 6678-01, adopted February 1, 2001. Ordinance No. 5142-91 amended the Development Order by (i) adding 200,000 square feet of industrial use and providing a maximum F.A.R. for the same; (ii) changing the phasing of the development from three phases to one phase with three subphases and revising conditions based on phasing; (iii) changing the time of payment of the Developer's proportionate share of the cost of road improvements; (iv) eliminating the requirement for a transportation management plan; and (v) extending the build-out date by five (5) years. Ordinance No. 5722-95 amended the Development Order by (i) modifying the phasing of the Development to one phase with no subphases from one phase with three subphases; (ii) decreasing office development by 7,480 square feet; (iii) clarifying the development entitlements allocated to each parcel of the Development; (iv) extending the build-out date by four (4) years, a cumulative extension of nine (9) years; (v) adding a conversion factor for the conversion of certain approved office development to multi-family residential development and the conversion of approved industrial development to either office development or multi-family residential development; (vi) deleting or modifying certain Development Order conditions to reflect changes in the transportation network affected by the Development; (vii) restating all remaining transportation -3- 0 0 improvement obligations of the Developer, including the obligation to dedicate and construct Park Place Boulevard; and (viii) modifying certain provisions of the Development Order to be consistent with changes described in the NOPC. Ordinance No. 6107-96 amended the Development Order by (i) providing a land use conversion factor for Parcel 4 allowing conversion of approved retail commercial development to office and/or hotel development and (ii) reflecting certain changes in ownership. Ordinance No. 6678-01 amended the Development Order by (i) providing a land use conversion factor for Parcel 6 for the conversion of approved office development to multi-family and/or hotel development and (ii) extending the build- out date by three years to December 31, 2003. Has there been a change in local government jurisdiction for any portion of the development since the last approval or development order was issued? No. If so, has the annexing local government adopted a new DRI development order for the project? Not applicable. 8. Describe any lands purchased or optioned within 1/4 mile of the original DRI site subsequent to the original approval or issuance of the DRI development order. Identify such land, its size, and intended use, and adjacent non- project land uses within'/2 mile on a project master site plan or other map. No additional lands have been purchased or optioned. 9. Indicate if the proposed change is less than 40% (cumulatively with other previous changes) of any of the criteria listed in Paragraph 380.06(19)(b), Florida Statutes. No. Do you believe this notification of change proposes a change which meets the criteria of Subparagraph 380.06(19)(e)2., F.S. Yes No X 10. Does the proposed change result in a change to the build-out date or any phasing date of the project? If so, indicate the proposed new build-out or phasing dates. -4- • Yes. The proposed build-out date is December 31, 2008. 11. Will the proposed change require an amendment to the local government comprehensive plan? No. Provide the following for incorporation into such an amended development order, pursuant to Subsections 380.06(15), F.S., and 9J-2.025, Florida Administrative Code: 12. An updated master site plan or other map of the development portraying and distinguishing the proposed changes to the previously approved DRI or development order conditions. See Exhibit "C" attached hereto and incorporated herein. 13. Pursuant to Subsection 380.06(10)(f), F.S., include the precise language that is being proposed to be deleted or added as an amendment to the development order. This language should address and quantify: a. All proposed specific changes to the nature, phasing, and build-out date of the development; to development order conditions and requirements; to commitments and representations in the Application for Development Approval; to the acreage attributable to each described proposed change of land use, open space, areas for preservation, green belts; to structures or to other improvements including locations, square footage, number of units; and other major characteristics or components of the proposed change; b. An updated legal description of the property, if any project acreage is/has been added or deleted to the previously approved plan of development; C. A proposed amended development order deadline for commencing physical development of the proposed changes, is applicable; d. A proposed amended development order termination date that reasonably reflects the time required to complete the development; e. A proposed amended development order date until which the local government agrees that the changes to the DRI shall not be subject to down-zoning, unit density reduction, or intensity reduction, if applicable; and -5- f. Proposed amended development order specifications for the annual report, including the date of submission, contents, and parties to whom the report is submitted as specified in Subsection 9J-2.025(7), F.A.C. A proposed ordinance adopting the proposed change and setting forth the precise language proposed to be changed is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "E." Exhibit "A" - Legal Description Exhibit "B" - Traffic Analysis Exhibit "C" - Revised Map H Exhibit "D" - Substantial Deviation Determination Chart Exhibit "E" - Ordinance 09/05/03 11:22 AM d-1 44384.107090 #300079 v1 - Bausch&Lomb/Park Place 2003 NOPC -6- EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PARK PLACE DRI Commence at the center of Section 17, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida and go S 89°46'01" W, 660.00 feet, along the South boundary of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17 (the East-West centerline of said Section 17;) thence N.00°19'21" W, 50.00 feet, to a point on the North right- of-way line of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard - State Road 60 for- a POINT OF BEGINNING; thence; following said North right-of-way line, S 89°46'01" W, 58.49 feet; thence N 00°13'59° W, 10.00 feet; thence S 89 46'01" W, 1319.21 feet; thence, leaving said North right-of-way line, N 01 004'04" E, 599.99 feet; thence S 89°46'01" W, 198.43 feet; thence N 00°52'21" E, 554.70 feet; thence S 89°54'49" W, 400.06 feet, to a point on the East right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 19; thence, following said East right-of-way line, N 01 004'04" E; 28.15 feet; thence along a curve to the right that has a radius of 192.00 feet, an arc length of 72.82 feet, a chord length of 72.39 feet, a chord bearing of N 11 °56'04" E, thence N 22047'58" E, 11.93 feet; thence along a curve to the left that has a radius of 238.00 feet, an arc length of 16.13 feet, a chord length of 16.13 feet, a chord bearing of N 20°51'27" E, to a point on the North boundary of the Southwest 1 /4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17; thence, leaving said East right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 19, N 89°54'49" E, 1222.19 feet, along the North boundary of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17 to the Southwest corner of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17; thence N 00°22'28" E, 1337.33 feet, along the West boundary of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1 /4 of Section 17 to the Northwest corner of said Northeast 1 /4 of the Northwest 1/4; thence S 89°56'11" E, 1312.06 feet, along the North boundary of said Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 to a point on the West right-of-way line of Hampton Road - County Road 144; thence S 00°19'21" E, 2337.71 feet, along said West right-of-way line; thence S 89046'01 W, 627.00 feet; thence S 00°10'21" E, 280.00 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING, containing 99.133 acres, more or less. #224188 v1 0 • EXHIBIT "D" PARK PLACE DRI SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION DETERMINATION CHART TYPE OF LAND USE CHANGE CATEGORY PROPOSED PLAN ORIGINAL PLAN PREVIOUS D.O. CHANGE AND DATE Attraction/Recreation # Parking Space N/A NIA NIA # Spectators # Seats Site locational changes Acreage, including drainage, ROW, easements, etc. # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA representations Airports Runway (length) N!A n?.""N!A NIA Runway (strength) Terminal (gross sq ft ) ? 2Q?3 1 rd . . 1 , # Parking Spaces # Gates Apron Area (gross sq. ft.) Site locational changes r-" Airport Acreage, including drainage, ROW, easements, etc. # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA representations Hospitals # Beds N/A N/A NIA # Parking Spaces Building (gross sq. ft.) Site locational changes Acreage, including drainage, ROW, easements, etc. # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA representations • • PARK PLACE DRI SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION DETERMINATION CHART (continued) TYPE OF LAND USE CHANGE CATEGORY PROPOSED PLAN ORIGINAL PLAN PREVIOUS D.O. CHANGE AND DATE Industrial Acreage, including drainage, ROW, easements, etc. # Parking Spaces Buildings (gross sq. ft.) No change -0- 200,000 SF GFA (12/19191- Ord. #5142-91) # Employees Chemical storage (barrels and lbs.) Site locational changes # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA representations Mining Operations Acreage mined (year) NIA N/A N/A Water Withdrawal (Gal/day) Size of Mine (acres), including drainage, ROW, easements, etc. Site locational changes # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA representations Office Acreage, including drainage, ROW, easements, etc. Building (gross sq. ft.) 404,639 SF GFA 1,103,000 SF GFA 803,000 SF GFA (12/19/91-Ord. #5142-91) # Parking Spaces 795,520 SF GFA (1/19/95-Ord. #5722-95)' # Employees Site locational changes # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA representations ' 159,840 square feet of Office was converted to 390 multi-family dwelling units pursuant to conversion allowed by Ord. #5722-95. After conversion, Office = 635,680 SF GFA. -2- PARK PLACE DRI SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION DETERMINATION CHART (continued) TYPE OF LAND USE CHANGE CATEGORY PROPOSED PLAN ORIGINAL PLAN PREVIOUS D.O. CHANGE AND DATE Petroleum/Chem. Storage Storage Capacity (barrels and/or lbs.) NIA NIA NIA Distance to Navigable Waters (ft.) Site locational changes Facility Acreage, including drainage, ROW, easements, etc. # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA representations Ports (Marinas) # boats, wet storage NIA N/A N/A # boats, dry storage Dredge and fill (cu. yds.) Petroleum storage (gals.) Site locational changes Port Acreage, including drainage, ROW, easements, etc. # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA representations Residential # dwelling units Proposed amendment will allow -0- 390 (per conversion - See Footnote #1) Type of dwelling units office development on Multi-family # lots additional parcel (Parcel 6) to Acreage, including drainage, ROW, be converted to multi-family. easements, etc. Site locational changes # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA representations -3- • PARK PLACE DRI SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION DETERMINATION CHART (continued) TYPE OF LAND USE CHANGE CATEGORY PROPOSED PLAN ORIGINAL PLAN PREVIOUS D.O. CHANGE AND DATE Wholesale, Retail, Service Acreage, including drainage, ROW, easements, etc. Floor Space (gross sq. ft.) 81,120 SF GFA 150,000 SF GFA None # Parking Spaces # Employees Site locational changes # External Vehicle Trips D.O. Conditions ADA representations Proposed amendment will allow -0- Ord. # 6107-96 set forth conversion Hotel/Motel # Rental Units office development on factor to allow Parcel 4 commercial Floor Space (gross sq. ft.) additional parcel (Parcel 6) to development to convert to hotel. # Parking Spaces be converted to hotel # Employees Site locational changes Acreage, including drainage, ROW, easements, etc. # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA representations R.V. Park Acreage, including drainage, ROW, N/A N/A N/A easements, etc. # Parking Spaces Buildings (gross sq. ft.) # Employees Site locational changes # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA Representations -4- • r 1 PARK PLACE DRI SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION DETERMINATION CHART (continued) TYPE OF LAND USE CHANGE CATEGORY PROPOSED PLAN ORIGINAL PLAN PREVIOUS D.O. CHANGE AND DATE Open Space Acreage No change proposed (All natural and Site locational changes vegetated non Type of open space impervious surfaces)(Z) D.O. conditions ADA representations Preservation, Buffer or Acreage No change proposed Special Protection Areas Site locational changes Development of site proposed D.O. conditions ADA representations 0910510312:05 PM d-1 44384.107090 #300082 v1 - Bausch&Lomb/Park Place 2003 Sub Dev Chart -5- 0 0 ORDINANCE NO. -03 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 3205-83, AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE NO. 3287-83, ORDINANCE NO. 5142-91, ORDINANCE NO. 5722-95, ORDINANCE NO. 6107-96 AND ORDINANCE NO. 6678-01, A DEVELOPMENT ORDER ISSUED PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 380, FLORIDA STATUTES, FOR PARK PLACE, A DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT; PROVIDING FINDINGS OF FACT; PROVIDING CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; EXTENDING THE BUILDOUT DATE; DETERMINING THAT SAID AMENDMENT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE ADOPTED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; PROVIDING FOR PROPER NOTICE OF PROPOSED ENACTMENT; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS ORDINANCE. WHEREAS, on September 1, 1983, the City Commission adopted Ordinance No. 3205-83 (the "Development Order") which ordinance constitutes a development order for Park Place, a development of regional impact, affecting the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein (the "Development"); and WHEREAS, on October 20, 1983, the City Commission adopted Ordinance No. 3287-83, an amendment to the Development Order and readopted Ordinance No. 3287-83 on December 8, 1983; and WHEREAS, on December 19, 1991, the City Commission adopted Ordinance No. 5142-91, an Amendment to the Development Order; and WHEREAS, on January 19, 1995, the City Commission adopted Ordinance No. 5722-95, an Amendment to the Development Order; and WHEREAS, on November 21, 1996, the City Commission adopted Ordinance No. 6107-96, an Amendment to the Development Order; and WHEREAS, on February 1, 2001, the City Commission adopted Ordinance No. 6678-01, an Amendment to the Development Order; and WHEREAS, on September , 2003, Bausch and Lomb Incorporated and Park Place Land, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership, the owners of certain undeveloped areas of the Development, filed an application entitled "Notification of a Proposed Change to a Previously Approved Development of Regional Impact ("DRI") pursuant to Subsection 380.06(19), Florida Statutes" (the "NOPC") with t y earwafe 2003 EXHIBIT "E" 0 0 "City"), with copies provided to the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council (the "TBRPC") and the Florida Department of Community Affairs (the "DCA"); and WHEREAS, the NOPC proposes to amend the Development Order to extend the build-out date by five years to December 31, 2008 (the "Proposed Change"); and WHEREAS, the Proposed Change, combined with previous amendments to the Development Order, is presumed to create a substantial deviation, pursuant to Subsection 380.06(19), Florida Statutes; and WHEREAS, the NOPC has satisfactorily addressed all regional issues related to the Development and the presumption of a substantial deviation has been rebutted; and WHEREAS, the City Commission, as the governing body of the local government having jurisdiction pursuant to Chapter 380, Florida Statutes, is authorized and empowered to consider applications for proposed changes to previously approved DRIs; and WHEREAS, the public notice requirements of Chapter 380, Florida Statutes, and the City have been satisfied; and WHEREAS, the City Commission has reviewed the NOPC, as well as all related testimony and evidence submitted by each party and members of the general public. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. Introduction - This Ordinance shall constitute an amendment to the Park Place Development Order as previously amended. Section 2. Findings - The City Commission, having received all related comments, testimony and evidence submitted by each party and members of the general public, finds that there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact: A. The Park Place Development Order, as adopted by Ordinance No. 3205- 83, and amended by Ordinances No. 3287-83, No. 5142-91, No. 5722-95, 6107-96 and 6678-01, is a valid final development order within the provisions of Section 163.3167(8), Florida Statutes, affecting the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein. 2 • B. Bausch and Lomb Incorporated and Park Place Land, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership, the owners of undeveloped portions of the DR[, have proposed that the Development Order be amended to extend the build-out date by five years to December 31, 2008. C. A comprehensive review of the impacts generated by the Proposed Change, together with all previous amendments, has been conducted by the City's departments, the TBRPC and the DCA. D. The Proposed Change is not located in an area of critical state concern designated as such pursuant to Section 380.05, Florida Statutes (1993). E. The Proposed Change, together with all previous amendments, does not increase the external traffic impact of the development, nor does it create additional impacts on other public facilities, including water, wastewater, drainage, solid waste, recreation and mass transit, from the original projections set forth in the Application for Development Approval ("ADA"). F. The Proposed Change hereby approved is determined not to be a substantial deviation to the Development Order. Section 3. Conclusions of Law - The City Commission, having made the above findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law: A. The Development as built to date is consistent with the local comprehensive plan and local land development regulations under which it was developed. B. The Development as modified herein, and as depicted on the Revised Map H, Master Plan, attached hereto as Exhibit "B," will not unreasonably interfere with the achievement of the objectives of the adopted state land development plan applicable to the area. C. The Proposed Change is consistent with the local land development regulations currently in effect. D. The Proposed Change, together with all previous amendments, does not create a reasonable likelihood of additional impact or any type of regional impact not previously reviewed by the TBRPC and DCA, over those treated under the Development Order. The Proposed Change, therefore, does not constitute a "substantial deviation" from the Development Order, pursuant to Chapter 380.06, Florida Statutes. The Proposed Change is exempt from the provisions of Ordinance No. 4983-90, City of Clearwater and the Park Place DRI remains vested thereunder. 3 0 9 E. Nothing herein shall limit or modify the rights originally approved by the Development Order or the protection afforded under Section 163.3167(8), Florida Statutes, except to the extent that specific rights and protections are limited or modified by the Proposed Change to the Development Order as approved by this ordinance. F. The Proposed Change is within the threshold guidelines of Ordinance No. 4983-90 of the City, relating to determinations of vested development rights, and the Park Place DRI remains vested thereunder. G. These proceedings have been duly conducted pursuant to applicable law and regulations, and based upon the record in these proceedings, the various departments of the City, Bausch and Lomb Incorporated, Park Place Land, Ltd., and other owners of the Development are authorized to approve/conduct development as described herein. H. The review by the City, the TBRPC, and other participating agencies and interested citizens reveals that impacts are adequately addressed pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 380, Florida Statutes. Section 4. Order - Having made the above findings of fact and drawn the above conclusions of law, it is ordered that the Development Order be amended as follows: A. The Conceptual Plan described in Sections 4.A. and 4.J. of the Development Order is amended to be as shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein. All references to the Conceptual Plan set forth in the Development Order shall refer to the Amended Conceptual Plan attached hereto as Exhibit "B." B. The build-out date is hereby extended to December 31, 2008. C. The amendments stated herein, together with all previous amendments, do not constitute a substantial deviation, pursuant to Chapter 380.06, Florida Statutes. D. Nothing herein shall limit or modify the rights originally approved by the Development Order or the protection afforded under Section 163.3167(8), Florida Statutes, except to the extent that specific rights and protections are limited or modified by the proposed amendments to the Development Order as approved by this ordinance. E. The City Clerk shall send copies of this ordinance, within five (5) days after passage of this ordinance on second reading to Bausch and Lomb Incorporated, Park Place Land, Ltd., DCA and TBRPC. 4 • • F. This ordinance shall be deemed rendered upon transmittal of copies hereof to the TBRPC and the DCA. G. Notice of adoption of this ordinance shall be recorded by the Developer in the public records of Pinellas County, Florida, as provided in Section 380.06, Florida Statutes. Section 5. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect when filed as provided by law, unless this ordinance is appealed, in which event this ordinance shall not take effect until such appeal has been decided. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Attest: Cynthia E. Goudeau City Clerk Approved as to form and correctness: Pamela K. Akin City Attorney Exhibit "A" - Legal Description Exhibit "B" - Revised Map H 09/05/03 10:49 AM d-1 44384.107090 #300081 v1 - Bausch&Lomb/Park Place 2003 Ordinance Brian Aungst Mayor - Commissioner 5 0 0 EXHIBIT "A" TO ORDINANCE NO. -03 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PARK PLACE Commence at the center of Section 17, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida and go S 89°46'01" W, 660.00 feet, along the South boundary of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17 (the East-West centerline of said Section 17;) thence N 00°19'21" W, 50.00 feet, to a point on the North right-of-way line of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard - State Road 60 for a POINT OF BEGINNING; thence, following said North right-of-way line, S 89°46'01" W, 58.49 feet; thence N 00°13'59" W, 10.00 feet; thence S 29°46'01" W, 1319.21 feet; thence, leaving said North right-of-way line, N 01 °04'04" E, 599.99 feet; thence S 89°46'01" W, 198.43 feet; thence N 00°52'21" E, 554.70 feet; thence S 89°54'49" W, 400.06 feet, to a point on the East right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 19; thence, following said East right-of-way line, N 01 °04'04" E, 28.15 feet; thence along a curve to the right that has a radius of 192.00 feet, an arc length of 72.82 feet, a chord length of 72.39 feet, a chord bearing of N 11 056'04" E, thence N 22°4758" E, 11.93 feet; thence along a curve to the left that has a radius of 238.00 feet, an arc length of 16.13 feet, a chord length of 16.13 feet, a chord bearing of N 20°51'27" E, to a point on the North boundary of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17; thence, leaving said East right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 19, N 89°54'49" E, 1222.19 feet, along the North boundary of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17 to the Southwest corner of the Northeast 1 /4 of the Northwest 1 /4 of said Section 17; thence N 00°22'28" E, 1337.33 feet, along the West boundary of the Northeast 1 /4 of the Northwest 1 /4 of Section 17 to the Northwest corner of said Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4; thence S 89°56'11" E, 1312.06 feet, along the North boundary of said Northeast 1 /4 of the Northwest 1 /4 to a point on the West right-of-way line of Hampton Road - County Road 144; thence S 00°19'21" E, 2337.71 feet, along said West right-of-way line; thence S 89°46'01" W, 627.00 feet; thence S 00°10'21" E, 280.00 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING, containing 99.133 acres, more or less. Subject to easements and rights-of-way of record. Information taken from survey by Lloveras, Baur & Stevens, Consulting Engineers-Land Surveyors, Clearwater, Florida, February 23, 1982. 0 0 EXHIBIT "B" TO ORDINANCE NO. -03 PARK PLACE DRI - MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN, MAP H REVISED AUGUST 22, 2003 JOHNSON, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, P. A. CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33757-136 CITY OF CLEARWATER 012009 044384.107090 9/10/2003 CITY OF CLEARWATER 500.00 Check Total 500.00 FORM N8088 031- TAMPA, FL 813-888-0521 FL230431 Septa 9/12/2003 Receipt #: 1200300000000009139 2:38:31PM Date: 09/12/2003 r Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No Amount Paid DR12003-09001 DRI Application 010-341262 500.00 Line Item Total: Payments: $500.00 Method Payer Bank No Account No Confirm No How Received Amount Paid Check JOHNSON,POPE,BOKOR,P.A. 012009 In Person 500.0 Payment Total: $500. &vt C\ (CC ( ?j C?7 r 5 (0/ THIS IS NOT A PERMIT. This is a receipt for an application for a permit. This application will be reviewed and you will be notified as to the outcome of the application. 0 cReceipt.rpt Page Iof I Property to the west :rty to the north Site view Park Place DRI2003-09001 300 South Park Place Boulevard Property to the east Property to the south Site view G I fl A f • 0 F . ry v ,+ ?--•* ? Jam,; ? 1 ;?•: ? • . . 4 U TI I! + . c `?' y = e r` J am- ? ?r ' ' v r 1 :.:sae ! - .? ? r Aerial Photograph Owners: Park Place Land, Ltd and Bausch and Lomb Case: DR12003-09001 Site: 300 South Park Place Boulevard Property Size (Acres): 99.13 17/29/16/66373/000/0050 17/29/16/66373/000/0040 17/29116/66373/000/0030 17/29/16/66373/000/0020 17/29/16/66373/000/0010 Notice of Proposed Change to extend 17/29/16/59392/001/0010 17/29/16/00000/230/1100 Request: the buildout date of the Development PIN: 17/29/16/000001230/0 1 00 17/29/ 1 6/00000/230/0130 of Regional Impact (DRI) by five years 1 7/29 /1 6 /00000 /240/00 60 to December 31, 2008. 17/29116/00000/240/0400 17129/16185546/000/0020 17/29/16/85546/000/0030 17/29/16/85546/000/0010 Atlas Page: 291 A E E .. ... TRAI Y "TWO r c 1 ' KAP04 ?V GLEN 3 , qC_ VISTA OR _ ?I ? .' • S ...... -:. A..._.. _ .. O FAS P ?2 V ?picE ?C GPAND VIE _.._ .. , . RD a BRIGADOON DR C MERRILL j o o PROJECT _ e s - SITE QLL DREW ST ?j y ? ¢ < U p v10a0 DREW p ?oa ST ? SANDLEWOOD ------------- a 8 O O , CHESAPE w u Cambridge Cir. g a e ?III??II// O p AKE S DR CI ST D < WHITMAN ST ? O ... q--.M..,„„,.... Orb Z . ?a q, R4°„ '? Ee9wee 0d VIRGINIA AVE m KENTUCKY eI. 7 }? ?5 Q CHAUCER ST F ¢ p = 2 GS " O O W a TENNES E'^ ? 1 . 2 11 SHELLEY L Csdin ° a?oe E W1 =? 41 S.R.60 GULF TO BAY BLVD .0 RD j--? SEVILLE BLVD PEARCE OR f BURNICE OR a fl ??? ? 1 Map Owners: Park Place Land, Ltd and Bausch and Lomb Case: DR12003-09001 Site: 300 South Park Place Boulevard Property Size (Acres): 99.13 17/29/16/66373/000/0050 17/29/16/66373/000/0040 17/29/16/66373/000/0030 17/29/16/66373/000/0020 17/29/16/66373/000/0010 Notice of Proposed Change to extend the buildout date of the Development PIN' 17/29/16/59392/001/0010 17/29/16/00000/230/1100 17/29/16/00000/230/0100 Request: 1 of Regional Impact (DRI) by five years 17/29/16/00000/230/0130 17/29/16/00000/240/0060 to December 31, 2008. 17/29/16/00000/240/0400 17/29/16/85546/000/0020 17/29/16/85546/000/0030 17/29/16/85546/000/0010 Atlas Page: 291 A • • ---------- ------ 2RH INS j RV/0 _ SEEM m-" I. 1- ---------' ? - -""CG c.* 4L r ?it.lrR?, Ir, T P Fier -F -A• ll 11. ' J i . ?/__ ?,• - !rC,!n.'. .I ` - /7" I I I " I i - _ - , Ilu 9 C4111 1 -1-0-BA - ?GI YG" - CVO _ '%R I PJO CG' 10 R/OG Future Land Use Plan Map Owners: Park Place Land, Ltd and Bausch and Lomb Case: DR12003-09001 Site: 300 South Park Place Boulevard Property Size (Acres): 99.13 17/29/16/66373/000/0050 17/29/16/66373/000/0040 17/29/16/66373/000/0030 17/29/16/66373/000/0020 17/29/16/66373/000/0010 Notice of Proposed Change to extend 17/29/16/59392/001/0010 the buildout date of the Development PIN: 17/29/16/00000/230/1100 17/29/16/00000/230/0100 Request: of Regional Impact (DRI) by five years 17/29/16/00000/230/0130 17/29/16/00000/240/0060 to December 31 2008 17/29/16/00000/240/0400 , . 17/29/16/85546/ODD/0020 17/29/16/85546/000/0030 17/29/16/85546/000/0010 Atlas Page: 291 A • C - --- ?_- ?_ ' _ V.j f 1.11 ? _ - _ _ • -_ . -- - • ' r e ?'•' •? -' e _ _ t ? MDR I :a;_. Aai IR '.. • - ?- ___ __,_ ..., '9• 'J H? 'ILI 11 . 1 . a F1 I 1 , I •. 1 , 1 , 1 - , I HD - DR, - Zoning Map Owners: Park Place Land, Ltd and Bausch and Lomb Case: DR12003-09001 Site: 300 South Park Place Boulevard Property Size (Acres): 99.13 17/29/16/66373/000/0050 17/29/16/66373/000/0040 17/29/16/66373/000/0030 1 17/29/16/66373/000/0020 17/29/16/66373/000/0010 Notice of Proposed Change to extend 17/29/16/59392/001/0010 the buildout date of the Development PIN: 17/29/16/°°°°°/230/11 17/29/16/00000/230/0100 00 Request: I of Regional Impact (DRI) by five years 17/29/16/00000/230/0130 17/29/16/00000/240/0060 2008 to December 31 17/29/16/00000/240/0400 , . 17/29/16/85546/000/0020 17/29/16/85546/000/0030 17/29/16/85546/000/0010 Atlas Page: 291A • 11 7 l 1'ti=fam " aI 'tad I:ivia ss ad i Fad UY 7 t2 R if tl 71 it {. -rlrns l? I f'-,-', eta' I •rlr '-- .-til , ! ? i ` "? ' I . • . I l - i, .- c;,.._ F! - i'" - •'I.:- :- y ---;-,---; ------ _ [Vitt 0. L _ <.; A,,c ommoda' ns ' :",???-' * i T `.-ti I l : ^`: «i: 'r•%I ;?;"r1i' `I s? - I ? h p1 ki} dejnatiaiI u o serce J r -' - : ? t ' f ri e , !; ,,. I :: Ir•••?Mi: ?,; il711 sta :I til /in rast c , }(fix pe" A_ _ _ • J I ? ' 1?1 Mike, e t rah _ a __7 Reta I II ._ ID:nl -ail XXV , deWrIaL, -- - --------- Exisfinging Surrounding Uses Owners: Park Place Land, Ltd and Bausch and Lomb Case: DR12003-09001 Site: 300 South Park Place Boulevard Property Size (Acres): 99.13 17/29/16/66373/000/0050 17/29/16/66373/000/0040 17/29/16/66373/000/0030 17/29/16/66373/000/0020 17/29/16/66373/00/00 Notice of Proposed Change to extend 17/29/16/59392/001/00 0 the buildout date of the Development PIN: 17/29/16/00000/230/1100 17/29/16/00000/230/0100 Request: of Regional Impact (DRI) by five years 17/29/16/00000/240/0060 2008 to December 31 17/29/16/00000/240/0400 , . 17/29/16/85546/000/0020 f 17/29/16/85546/000/0030 17/29/16/85546/000/0010 I Atlas Page: 291 A • DREW ST PARCEL 1 rn Q = PARCEL 3 0 vi PARCEL 2 PARCEL 8 S PARCEL 4 PARCEL 7 PARCEL 6 PARCEL5 o? w Q A CEL 10 P RC L11 GULF TO BAY BLVD Parcel Configuraion Map Owners: Park Place Land, Ltd and Bausch and Lomb Case: DR12003-09001 Site: 300 South Park Place Boulevard Property Size (Acres): 99.13 17/29/16/66373/000/0050 17/29/16/66373/000/0040 17/29/16/66373/000/0030 17/29/16/66373/000/0020 17/29/16/66373/000/0010 Notice of Proposed Change to extend 17/29/16/59392/001/0010 the buildout date of the Development PIN: 17/29/16/00000/230/1100 17/29/16/00000/230/0100 Request: of Regional Impact (DRI) by five years 17/29/ 16/00000/230/0130 17/29/16/00000/240/0060 2008 to December 31, 17/29/16/00000/240/0400 17/29/16/85546/000/0020 17/29/16/85546/000/0030 17/29/16/85546/000/0010 Atlas Page: 291 A j ter'-r?? ?q a -3 Tampa Say,R.egional Planning Council Chair Vice-Chair Secretary/Treasurer Executive Director Commissioner Barbara Sheen Todd Commissioner Steve Simon Commissioner Jane_von-hlahmann Manny L. Pumariega October 10, 2003 Mr. Maura R, Minges Bausch and Lomb, Inc. One Bausch & Lomb Place Rochester, NY 14604 Subject: Dear Mr. Minges: UG j 1 D NU IEN DRI #92 - Park Place, Notice of Proposed Change, City of Clearwater The staff of the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council has completed the review of the above- referenced NOPC Application submitted on September 11, 2003. The following serves as a background of the project, a summary of proposed modifications and the identification of additional information requested. BACKGROUND On September 1, 1983, the City of Clearwater granted a Development Order (Ordinance No. 3205- 83) to Metro Development Corporation for a 99.1-acre commercial and office development located at the northeast corner of the S.R. 60/U.S. 19 intersection. The project was originally approved to contain 1,500,000 square feet (sq. ft.) of office space and 460,000 sq. ft. of retail space. The Development Order has subsequently been amended four times, with the latest occurring on February 1, 2001 (Ordinance No. 6678-01). The amendments have cumulatively: modified the development parameters; authorized multi-family and hotel as approved uses; consolidated the entire project into a single phase; established and modified a land use equivalency matrix for various parcels; and extended the project buildout date by 18 years (to December 31, 2003) based on the phasing consolidation. The Development Order expires on December 31, 2003. The project is currently approved for the following development entitlements: PROJECT BUILDOUT OFFICE (Sq. Ft.) INDUSTRIAL (Sq. Ft.) RETAIL (Sq. Ft.) RESIDENTIAL (M.F. Units) December 31, 2003 404,639 200,000 81,120 390 9455 Koger Boulevard, Suite 219, St. Petersburg, FL 33702-2491 Phone (727) 570-5151 FAX (727) 570-51 18 State Number 513-5066 www.tbrpc.org TTRRENT NOPC DE-SCRIPTIO-N The applicant has requested an additional five year extension of the project buildout date (to December 31, 2008). ?OMMF,NTS/RF(?[???T FOR ADD?TIONA?, INFOI?MATTON Additional Information, Appendices A, B and C. Please supply a copy of the HCS electronic files used in the traffic analysis, or provide the multi-page printout for each HCS analysis. If electronic files are submitted, please provide an equivalency table that notes the intersection name, the corresponding electronic file name, the year of the analysis, and the development scenario being analyzed. 2. Coordinated Signal Timing, HCS Arterial Analysis, Appendices A, B and C. In the arterial analysis, if the traffic signals are assumed to be coordinated, then all of the traffic signals in the analyzed arterial should have the same cycle length. Please revise the arterial analysis accordingly. 3. Year 2008, HCS Arterial Analysis, Appendix C. In the year 2008 arterial analysis, the computed "v/c" for each segment should have a value of 1.0 or less. Please revise the arterial analysis accordingly. As noted in the Highway Capacity Manual 2000, Page 15-5, top sidebar note, at the top of the page, right margin, "The v/c ratio (X) for a lane group cannot be greater than 1.0 to compute uniform delay." For example, at the bottom of Page C-17, in the eastbound direction, the v/c ratio for the SR 60 link of Hercules Avenue to Belcher Road is greater than 1.0 (it is 1.170). Please revise this arterial analysis and the other arterial analysis so that the v/c for each segment has a value of 1.0, or less. 4. V/C Ratios, HCS Signalized Intersection Analysis, Appendix C. In the year 2008 signalized intersection analysis, the computed "v/c" for each lane group-must have a value of 1.0 or less. Please revise the signalized intersection analysis accordingly. . If the We ratio is larger than 1.0, it indicates queue carryover from one period to another. The standard HCS analysis does not consider queue carryover from one period to another. For example, at the bottom of Page C-11, the westbound left has a v/c ratio greater than 1.0 (it is 1.21). Please revise this signalized intersection analysis and the other intersection analyses so that the v/c for any lane group has a value of 1.0, or less. 5. Intersection Capacity Consumed by Full-Project, Appendix C, Pages C-1 and C-2. Please make the following changes in the "Intersection Capacity Consumed by Full-Project" methodology, on Pages C-1 and C-2. The total intersection capacity should be revised so that the capacity of the intersection is the sum of the capacity of the critical movements (the critical movements are noted by the software), not the sum of the capacity of all movements. The intersection capacity needs to be adjusted from the noted level of service E capacity to level of service D capacity. The adjustment factor is 0.885. Please multiply the intersection capacities by 0.885 to obtain the level of service D capacity. The HCS analysis is for the critical 15 minute period within the PM peak hour. The software divides the input "volumes" by the PHF when calculating the "adjusted flow rate." Accordingly, please divide the "Full-Project" volumes by the PHF to derive the project volumes that are used by the HCS software to calculate level of service. 6. Exhibit D: Park Place DRI Substantial Deviation Determination Chart. There appears to be many discrepancies between the NOPC application Exhibit D, and the other information in the NOPC application. For example, in Exhibit D, in the "Type and Land Use" column, for the office category, it is stated in the far right column titled "Previous DO Change and Date" that the latest previous approval was for "795,520 SF GFA." Then in footnote 1, it is noted that some of the office was traded for multi-family, so that the remaining office after the trade-off is "635,680 SF GFA." This is not consistent with the information contained in Exhibit B (Traffic Analysis Report, Dated September 2003). In Exhibit B, page 2, it is noted that the latest approved development is: Retail = 81,10 SF Office = 404,639 SF Light Industrial = 2 00,000 SF Multi-family = 390 DU Another inconsistency is that in Exhibit D, for the residential category, it is noted in the "Proposed Plan" column that "Proposed amendment will allow office development on an additional parcel (Parcel 6) to be converted to multi-family." This proposed conversion is not discussed in Exhibit B (Traffic Analysis Report, Dated September 2003). Please revise Exhibit D, and the other NOPC application information so that there is consistency from document to document. 7. Although not stated in the NOPC application, it is assumed that the developer is seeking an identical five-year extension of the Development Order expiration date (to December 31, 2008). If this is correct, appropriate representation to this fact should be incorporated into the application and the proposed amendatory language. The proposed Master Development Plan. identifies a last revised date of August 22, 2003. Please identify all proposed changes to the Map and the prior date of revision(s). Comments received from the Florida Department of Transportation have been appended to this correspondence. No comments have'been received from any of the other review entities. It is my understanding that comments from the City of Clearwater and the Pinellas County MPO will be submitted to your attention under separate cover. Please address any/all agency issues simultaneously and respond to all these parties identified below. If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me (ext. 255) or Mr. George Deakin directly (813/620- 1460). Thank you. JMM cc: Mr. Nick Shackelton, CIG, Inc. Mr. Ramon Solis; Pinellas County MPO Mr. Tim Johnson, JPBR&B Mr. Kent Fast, FDOT Mr. Robert Pergolizzi, GCC, Inc. Ms. Marina Pennington, FDCA GMs.` Guia;CIdyton, City 0 f Clearwater Mr. George Deakin, KHA ct-09-03 03:43P FD? Di-S' 7 Planning ?3 97F 5443 5127800 P_01 Florida Departinent of Transportation 1101 N. WK,,,l«y D ,v • Tampa. I 13:4119 6A56 + Phone 18 131 975 6000 0 1.800 226 /220 Jl'.I; RI15F1 JUSG,1RRF:U GOVERNOR SLCRETARY October 9, 2003 Mr. John Meyer DRI Review Coordinator Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council 9455 Koger Boulevard - Suite 219 St. Petersburg, Florida 33702 Re: Park Place NOPC (DRl# 92) . . Pinellas County, Florida . Dear Mr. Meyer: We reviewed the transportation analysis for the Park Place DRi. The request is primarily to extend the project buiidout date until December 31, 2008. Approximately 100,000 square feet of light industrial land use is as ,yet unbu.ilt. Another 100,000 square feet of office is identified as "planned" on the Map H. We have some comments which need to be addressed by the developer. 1) At the transportation methodology meeting-we did not discuss what constitutes a ".recent' traffic count. However I was expecting traffic counts to be more recent than July 2001 for Drew Street and for SR 60. Please ask the applicant to describe current traffic conditions for these streets and explain why these 2001 counts should still be considered acceptable. Drew Street carries approximately 31% of project traffic and SR 60 carries 381% of project traffic from the site. 2) In the 11C:S arterial analysis for SR 60, the cycle lengths should be the same if the signals are to be coordinated for both 2003 and 2008 time frames. Why was riot an arterial analysis completed for Drew Street also? Please revisit the analysis and revise if warranted.. 3) 1 do not follow the logic of Tables 2A and 2B of the analysis. It appears that with transit and retail pass-by capture reductions, the retail parcels will experience a very significant reduction in traffic generated at the driveways- Please verify that pass-by traffic.does not exceed 109% of adjacent street traffic. Also ask the applicant to explain the process used to reduce the external traffic. Perhaps one table with a column for each category of reduction would assist the review agencies in determining the accuracy of the calculations. www.doL.SLatG.fl,Lls ® RECYCLEDPMPI C*] ¦ ct-09-03 03:44P FC Di 7 Planning \3 9? 6443 5127800 P_01 y . 1 1 4) It appear9 that Table 2B is depicting project traffic that has been built already, and is thus on the roadway. How does the 100,000 square feet of office in Parcel 6 get counted? Please comment. Thank you for this opportunity to comment. Sincerely, Kent Fast, AICP DPI Coordinator cc: TBRPC mail out list U: \pl7301d\dsLrevi\dri03 \031009.092.doe Received Time Oct. 9. 3:44PM STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS "Dedicated to making Florida a better place to call home" 7EB BUSH COLLEEN CASTILLE Governor Secretary October 22, 2003 Ms. Gina Clayton City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, Florida 33758 Re: Park Place Development of Regional Impact (DRI); Notification of Proposed Change; File # ADA-883-002 Dear Ms. Clayton: E 19: OCT 2 7 2003 CI T Y CIF t,axs AF `??°?T a? z The Department of Community Affairs received a Notification of Proposed Change (NOPC) on the Park Place DRI from Mr. Timothy A. Johnson, Jr., authorized agent for the project on September 11, 2003. The proposed change is to extend the projects buildout date an additional five years to December 31, 2008. The buildout date for the Park Place DRI had previously been extended by 18 years to December 31, 2003. Based on the review of the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council (TBRPC) and the Florida Department of transportation (FDOT), the Department objects to the proposed changes. Please see the enclosed comments from the TBRPC and FDOT. The Department recommends that the applicant coordinate with the TBRPC, FDOT, and the City of Clearwater to address all agency concerns. If additional information is provided to adequately address the objection, the Department will reconsider its position. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Ron Horlick, Planner, at (850) 922-1801. Sincerely yours, Charles Gauthier, AICP Chief of Comprehensive Planning Enclosures CG/rh Cc: Manuel Pumariega, Executive Director, Tampa Bay RPC Kent Fast, FDOT District Seven 2555 SHUMARD OAK BOULEVARD • TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-2100 Phone: 850.488.8466/Suncom 278.8466 FAX: 850.921.0781/Suncom 291.0781 Internet address: htto://www.dca.state.fl.us CRITICAL STATE CONCERN FIELD OFFICE COMMUNITY PLANNING EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 2796 Overseas Highway, Suite 212 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Marathon, FL 33050-2227 Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 Tallahassee, FL 32399 2100 (305) 289-2402 (850) 488-2356 (850) 413-9969 (850) 488-7956 Chair Vice-Chair Secretary/Measurer Commissioner Barbara Sheen Todd Commissioner Steve Simon Commissioner Jane von Hahmann September 11, 2003 Mr. Maura R, Minges Bausch and Lomb, Inc. One Bausch & Lomb Place Rochester, NY 14604 Executive Director Manny L. Pumariega Subject: DRI #92 - Park Place, Notice of Proposed Change, City of Clearwater Dear Mr. Minges_ The Council received additional information submitted in conjunction with the above-referenced application on October 20, 2003 by Mr. Timothy Johnson Therefore, with this date constituting commencement of the Council's 30-day review period, comments will be provided by our agency on Wednesday, November 19, 2003. Any comments received from the review agencies (identified below) will be appended to our correspondence. If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me here at the Council (ext. 255). Thank you. Sincerely, J eyer DRI Coordinator cc: Mr. Nick Shackelton, CIG, Inc. Mr. Tim Johnson, JPBR&B Mr. Robert Pergolizzi, GCC, Inc. Ms. Gina Clayton, City of Clearwater Mr. Ramon Solis, Pinellas County MPO Mr. Kent Fast, FDOT Ms. Marina Pennington, FDCA Mr. George Deakin, KHA OCT 2 7 2UU3 9455 Koger Boulevard, Suite 219, St. Petersburg, FL 33702-2491- k Phone (727) 570-5151 FAX(727)570-5118 State Numqei 513-5066 '' www. tbrpc. org LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PARK PLACE DRI Commence at the center of Section 17, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida and go S 89°46'01" W, 660.00 feet, along the South boundary of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17 (the East-West centerline of said Section 17;) thence N 00°19'21" W, 50.00 feet, to a point on the North right- of-way line of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard - State Road 60 for a POINT OF BEGINNING; thence, following said North right-of-way line, S 89°46'01°W, 58.49 feet; thence N 00°13'59" W, 10.00 feet; thence S 8¢4601" W, 1319.21 feet; thence, leaving said North right-of-way line, N 01 004'04" E, 599.99 feet; thence S 89°46'01" W, 198.43 feet; thence N 00°52'21" E, 554.70 feet; thence S 89°54'49" W, 400.06 feet, to a point on the East right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 19; thence, following said East right-of-way line, N 01004'04" E, 28.15 feet; thence along a curve to the right that has a radius of 192.00 feet, an arc length of 72.82 feet, a chord length of 72.39 feet, a chord bearing of N 11 056'04" E, thence N 22°47'58" E, 11.93 feet; thence along a curve to the left that has a radius of 238.00 feet, an arc length of 16.13 feet, a chord length of 16.13 feet, a chord bearing of N 20°51'27" E, to a point on the North boundary of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1 /4 of said Section 17; thence, leaving said East right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 19, N 89°54'49" E, 1222.19 feet, along the North boundary of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17 to the Southwest corner of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17; thence N 00°22'28" E, 1337.33 feet, along the West boundary of the Northeast 1 /4 of the Northwest 1 /4 of Section 17 to the Northwest corner of said Northeast 1 /4 of the Northwest 1/4; thence S 89°56'11" E, 1312.06 feet, along the North boundary of said Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 to a point on the West right-of-way line of Hampton Road - County Road 144; thence S 00°19'21" E, 2337.71 feet, along said West right-of-way line; thence S 89°46'01" W, 627.00 feet; thence S 00°10'21" E, 280.00 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING, containing 99.133 acres, more or less. #224188 v1 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PARK PLACE DRI Commence at the center of Section 17, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida and go S 89°46'01" W, 660.00 feet, along the South boundary of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section- 17 (the East-West centerline of said Section 17;) thence N 00°19'21" W, 50.00 feet, to a point on the North right- of-way line of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard - State Road 60 for a POINT OF BEGINNING; thence, following said North right-of-way line,. S 89°46'01" W, 58.49 feet; thence N 00°13'59" W, 10.00 feet; thence S 6946'01" W, 1319.21 feet; thence, leaving said North right-of-way line, N 01 °04'04" E, 599.99 feet; thence S 89°46'01" W, 198.43 feet; thence N 00°52'21" E, 554.70 feet; thence S 89°54'49" W, 400.06 feet, to a point on the East right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 19; thence, following said East right-of-way line, N 01 °04'04" E, 28.15 feet; thence along a curve to the right that has a radius of 192.00 feet, an arc length of 72.82 feet, a chord length of 72.39 feet, a chord bearing of N 11 °56'04" E, thence N 22°47'58" E, 11.93 feet; thence along a curve to the left that has a radius of 238.00 feet, an arc length of 16.13 feet, a chord length of 16.13 feet, a chord bearing of N 20°51'27" E, to a point on the North boundary of the Southwest 1 /4 of the Northwest 1 /4 of said Section 17; thence, leaving said East right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 19, N 89°54'49" E, 1222.19 feet, along the North boundary of the Southwest 1 /4 of the Northwest 1 /4 of said Section 17 to the Southwest corner of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17; thence N 00°22'28" E, 1337.33 feet, along the West boundary of the Northeast 1 /4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 17 to the Northwest corner of said Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4; thence S 89°56'11" E, 1312.06 feet, along the North boundary of said Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 to a point on the West right-of-way line of Hampton Road -. County Road 144; thence S 00°19'21" E, 2337.71 feet, along said West right-of-way line; thence S 89°46'01" W, 627.00 feet; thence S 00°10'21" E, 280.00 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING, containing 99.133 acres, more or less. #224188 v1 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PARK PLACE DR[ Commence at the center of Section 17, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida and go S 89°46'01" W, 660.00 feet, along the South boundary of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17 (the East-West centerline of said Section 17;) thence N 00°19'21" W, 50.00 feet, to a point on the North right- of-way line of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard - State Road 60 for a POINT OF BEGINNING; thence, following said North right-of-way line,. S 89°46'01" W, 58.49 feet; thence N 00°13'59" W, 10.00 feet; thence S $x°46'01" W, 1319.21 feet; thence, leaving said North right-of-way line, N 01 °04'04" E, 599.99 feet; thence S 89°46'01" W, 198.43 feet; thence N 00°52'21" E, 554.70 feet; thence S 89°54'49" W, 400.06 feet, to a point on the East right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 19; thence, following said East right-of-way line, N 01 °04'04" E, 28.15 feet; thence along a curve to the right that has a radius of 192.00 feet, an arc length of 72.82 feet, a chord length of 72.39 feet, a chord bearing of N 11 056'04" E, thence N 22°47'58" E, 11.93 feet; thence along a curve to the left that has. a radius of 238.00 feet, an arc length of 16.13 feet, a chord length of 16.13 feet, a chord bearing of N 20°51'27" E, to a point on the North boundary of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1 /4 of said Section 17; thence, leaving said East right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 19, N 89°54'49" E, 1222.19 feet, along the North boundary of the Southwest 1 /4 of the Northwest. 1 /4 of said Section 17 to the Southwest corner, of the Northeast 1 /4 of the Northwest 1 /4 of said Section 17; thence N 00°22'28" E, 1337.33 feet, along the West boundary of the Northeast 1 /4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 17 to the Northwest corner of said Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4; thence S 89°56'11" E, 1312.06 feet, along the North boundary of said Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 to a point on the West right-of-way line of Hampton Road - County Road 144; thence S 00°19'21" E, 2337.71 feet, along said West right-of-way line; thence S 89°46'01" W, 627.00 feet; thence S 00°10'21" E, 280.00 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING, containing 99.133 acres, more or less. #224188 v1 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PARK PLACE DRI Commence at the center of Section 17, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida and go S 89°46'01" W, 660.00 feet, along the South boundary of the Northwest 1 /4 of said Section 17 (the East-West centerline of said Section 17;) thence N 00°19'21" W, 50.00 feet, to a point on the North right- of-way line of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard State Road 60 for a POINT OF BEGINNING; thence, following said North right-of-way line, S 89°46'01" W, 58.49 feet; thence N 00°13'59" W, 10.00 feet; thence S #46'01" W, 1319.21 feet; thence, leaving said North right-of-way line, N 01'04' 04" E, 599.99 feet; thence S 89°46'01" W, 198.43 feet; thence N 00°5221" E, 554.70 feet; thence S 89°54'49° W, 400.06 feet, to a point on the East right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 19; thence, following said East right-of-way line, N 01 °04'04" E; 28.15 feet; thence along a curve to the right that has a radius of 192.00 feet, an arc length of 72.82 feet, a chord length of 72.39 feet, a chord bearing of N 11 °56'04" E, thence N 22°47'58" E, 11.93 feet; thence along a curve to the left that has a radius of 238.00 feet, an arc length of 16.13 feet, a chord length of 16.13 feet, a chord bearing of N 20°51'27" E, to a point on the North boundary of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1 /4 of said Section 17; thence, leaving said East right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 19, N 89°54'49" E, 1222.19 feet, along the North boundary of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17 to the Southwest corner of the Northeast 1 /4 of the Northwest 1 /4 of said Section 17; thence N 00°22'28" E, 1337.33 feet, along the West boundary of the Northeast 1 /4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 17 to the Northwest corner of said Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4; thence S 89°56'11" E, 1312.06 feet, along the North boundary of said Northeast 1 /4 of the Northwest 1 /4 to a point on the West right-of-way line of Hampton Road - County Road 144; thence S 00°19'21" E, 2337.71 feet, along said West right-of-way line; thence S 89°46'01" W, 627.00 feet; thence S 00°10'21" E, 280.00 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING, containing 99.133 acres, more or less. #224188 v1 L EXHIBIT °A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PARK PLACE DRI Commence at the center of Section 17, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida and go S 89°46'01" W, 660.00 feet, along the South boundary of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17 (the East-West centerline of said Section 17;) thence N 00°19'21° W, 50.00 feet, to a point on the North right- of-way line of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard - State Road 60 for a POINT OF BEGINNING; thence, following said North right-of-way line, S 89°46'01" W, 58.49 feet; thence N 00°13'59" W, 10.00 feet; thence S 8046'01" W, 1319.21 feet; thence, leaving said North right-of-way line, N 01 °04'04" E, 599.99 feet; thence S 89°46'01" W, 198.43 feet; thence N 00°52'21" E, 554.70 feet; thence S 89°54'49 W, 400.06 feet, to a point on the East right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 19; thence, following said East right-of-way line, N 01 °04'04" E, 28.15 feet; thence along a curve to the right that has a radius of 192.00 feet, an arc length of 72.82 feet, a chord length of 72.39 feet, a chord bearing of N 11 056'04" E, thence N 22°47'58" E, 11.93 feet; thence along a curve to the left that has a radius of 238.00 feet, an arc length of 16.13 feet, a chord length of 16.13 feet, a chord bearing of N 20°51'27 E, to a point on the North boundary of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1 /4 of said Section 17; thence, leaving said East right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 19, N 89°54'49" E, 1222.19 feet, along the North boundary of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17 to the Southwest corner of the Northeast 1 /4 of the Northwest 1 /4 of said Section 17; thence N 00°22'28" E, 1337.33 feet, along the West boundary of the Northeast 1 /4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 17 to the Northwest corner of said Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4; thence S 89°56'11" E, 1312.06 feet, along the North boundary of said Northeast 1 /4 of the Northwest 1 /4 to a point on the West right-of-way line of Hampton Road - County Road 144; thence S 00°19'21" E, 2337.71 feet, along said West right-of-way line; thence S 89°46'01" W, 627.00 feet; thence S 00°10'21" E, 280.00 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING, containing 99.133 acres, more or less. #224188 v1 EXHIBIT "An LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PARK PLACE DRI Commence at the center- of Section 17, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida and go S 89°46'01" W, 660.00 feet, along the South boundary of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17 (the East-West centerline of said Section 17;) thence N 00°19'21" W, 50.00 feet, to a point on the North right- of-way line of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard. State Road 60 for a POINT OF BEGINNING; thence, following said North right-of-way line, S 89°46'01" W, 58.49 feet; thence N 00°13'59" W, 10.00 feet; thence S 8°46'01" W, 1319.21 feet; thence, leaving said North right-of-way line, N 01 °04'04" E, 599.99 feet; thence S 89°46'01" W, 198.43 feet; thence N 00°52'21" E, 554.70 feet; thence S 89°54'49° W, 400.06 feet, to a point on the East right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 19; thence, following said East right-of-way line, N 01 °04'04 E, 28.15 feet; thence along a curve to the right that has a radius of 192.00 feet, an arc length of 72.82 feet, a chord length of 72.39 feet, a chord bearing of N 11 056'04" E, thence N 22°47'58" E, 11.93 feet; thence along a curve to the left that has a radius of 238.00 feet, an arc length of 16.13 feet, a chord length of 16.13 feet, a chord bearing of N 20°51'27" E, to a point on the North boundary of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17; thence, leaving said East right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 19, N 89°5449" E, 1222.19 feet, along the North boundary of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17 to the Southwest corner of the Northeast 1 /4 of the Northwest 1 /4 of said Section 17; thence N 00°22'28" E, 1337.33 feet, along the West boundary of the Northeast 1 /4 of the Northwest 1 /4 of Section 17 to the Northwest corner of said Northeast 1 /4 of the Northwest 1/4; thence S 89°56'11" E, 1312.06 feet, along the North boundary of said Northeast 1 /4 of the Northwest 1 /4 to a point on the West right-of-way line of Hampton Road - County Road 144; thence S 00°19'21" E, 2337.71 feet, along said West right-of-way line; thence S 89°46'01 n W, 627.00 feet; thence S 00°10'21" E, 280.00 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING, containing 99.133 acres, more or less. #224188 v1 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PARK PLACE DRI Commence at the center of Section 17, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida and go S 89°46'01" W, 660.00 feet, along the South boundary of the Northwest 1 /4 of said Section 17 (the East-West centerline of said Section 17;) thence N 00°19'21" W, 50.00 feet, to a point on the North right- of-way line of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard State Road 60 for a POINT OF BEGINNING; thence, following said North right-of-way line, S 89°46'01" W, 58.49 feet; thence N 00°13'59" W, 10.00 feet; thence S 8°4601" W, 1319.21 feet; thence, leaving said North right-of-way line, N 01 °04'04" E, 599.99 feet; thence S 89°46'01" W, 198.43 feet; thence N 00°5221" E, 554.70 feet; thence S 89°54'49" W, 400.06 feet, to a point on the East right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 19; thence, following said East right-of-way line, N 01 °04'04" E; 28.15 feet; thence along a curve to the right that has a radius of 192.00 feet, an arc length of 72.82 feet, a chord length of 72.39 feet, a chord bearing of N 11 056'04" E, thence N 22°47'58" E, 11.93 feet; thence along a curve to the left that has a radius of 238.00 feet, an arc length of 16.13 feet, a chord length of 16.13 feet, a chord bearing of N 20°51'27" E, to a point on the North boundary of the Southwest 1 /4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17; thence, leaving said East right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 19, N 89°5449" E, 1222.19 feet, along the North boundary of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17 to the Southwest corner of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17; thence N 00°22'28" E, 1337.33 feet, along the West boundary of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 17 to the Northwest corner of said Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4; thence S 89°56'11" E, 1312.06 feet, along the North boundary of said Northeast 1 /4 of the Northwest 1 /4 to a point on the West right-of-way line of Hampton Road - County Road 144; thence S 00°19'21" E, 2337.71 feet, along said West right-of-way line, thence S 89°46'01" W, 627.00 feet; thence S 00°10'21" E, 280.00 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING, containing 99.133 acres, more or less. #224188 v1 File Edit View Favorites Tools Help !J Bacti t7?Search ¢ (Favorites Media Aci+: ees] http-//pubgis.co.pinellos.fl u: +'puhlic gist Pinellas Count GIS € 1 Quer b JI Y Y Address - go -r- u - 2- NOTE: Double-Click Groups to Expan > GENERAL ' BUSINESS BUSINESS INCENTIVE AREAS ?p a DISTRICTS ?? 91 DEMOGRAPHICS ?r 0 JURISDICTIONS ?? ROADS Q Arterial ?? Major Roads ............. ?? Road ? Road Names ?r fE? LAND USE ?p f=?^; PARCELS ? - Site Plans ? Parcel Lines - Black Color ? - Property Values ? L Parcel Lines ? - Comp Land Use Plan ? - Comp Land Use Plan Legend - Parcel Polygons ?? GRIDS ??? EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT ? 2000 Color Aerials ?? CITIES i6"u° County Outline Solid.; Nom- r x _ f? Go Links *NEW TOOLBAR HELP* Query Tips I Contact Info I Disclaimer I Home Parcel Polygons OFF 0leature(sj selected i . 6,304 F,5B1 x 3,497 ?? _ - _ - - - r- ImV Internet t? ? Inbox - lJ,tcrosof,,. PERMIT*PLAN `Pinellas County 0... ?'Pilnellas County. -- Planning hepartm2nt " ice ;-- ? 12:19 PM File Edit Veeer Favorite Tnol? Hetp .^,- Back ,? . r? Search a] Favorites Media ep Address K?ttp:#pubgis.co.pinellas.fl.us/public_gis/ - I t9l X PGo Links " *NEW TOOLBAR HELP* Query Tips Contact Info I Disclaimer I Home Query by Address 1-. go I?4 Parcel Polygons OFF Pinellas County GIS IF R f 0 3 ups cr ck R" CQ x a . Or- ffl A Xti 2 c. I_NOTE: Double-Click Groups to Expan ?p? GENERAL ??3 BUSINESS Parcel Report for- "Pinellas County Public GIS Viewer - Microsoft Internet Explore C' ?X Close Window 17/29/16/66373/000/0050 :_Yy Property Appraiser Tax,collector j Municipality: Clearwater -""........ ...... ...€ Zoning: Not applicable Comp.Land Use: Not applicable i f Acreage: 1.605 Tax District. Cw Voter Precinct: 607 ---- - Fire District: 05 - Clearwater Evac Level- NON-EVAC Census Block: i Census Tract: 11 C. Zipcode: 33759 within 750ft of Eagle Nest. NO [I within 1500ft of Eagle Nest: NO I. _ Polygons : Parcel Id 172916000D02300500-Sitee Address: 20967 US HIGHWAY 19 N-Zipcode: 0 2A * E "I I ®Inbox - Micr.., *PEPMIT*PLA...? ;E (Pinellas Coun... 0-ji Pinellas vided by The City of Clearwater ! r 1 j 1 Parcel Polygons' selected 1 3,152 2,791 x 1,748 (ft) , F 17 F _ --- Internet 1 In... I? Pinellas CO... Planning Deportment " I : ? , 12:13 PM =LJ X r Back ? i? "v ,? Search nFavorites F?Media Address 41 httna/nubais.co.oinelles.fl.us/public aisl *NEW TOOLBAR HELP* I Query Tips I Contact Info I Di. Pinellas County GIS Query by Address 1- :go Parcel Polygons (- „OFF IC ] LNOTE "Double"•Click Groups to Expan ?''-"- GENERAL 3 BUSINESS _ t Parcel Report for: - ? Close Window 2730 GULF TO BAY BLVD ;I 17/29/16/66373/000/0040 1 s- Property Appraiser TaxCollector i1 Municipality: Clearwater i Zoning: Not applicable Comp.Land Use: Not applicable ':. Acreage: 1.473 Tax District: Cw Voter Precinct: 607 Fire District: 05 - Clearwater ?EvacLevel- NON-EVAC ij Census Block: Census Tract: Zipcode: 33759 within 750ft of Eagle Nest: NO :vi thin 1500ft of Eagle Nest. NO ......-_...... .. ' E ( 3 E 1 E I ....... -' a _ i 60 ?' iaGo Links" :laimer I Home d Q , i i S# i R -- - - _ ?- - __ - -- -?? -- ,iwaket Zoni 1 'Patcel Polyg=' select rd 1:3,15 ' ' 791 x 1;744 {kl 00100 5de Address. 380 PARK PLACE Zi code. 33759-MunicRalit . Ciea arcel Pol cons:Parcel ld 172916101000023 „yBStar?t k? ?IriL»;. iF+cr ?4?PERMIT*F'L,-.. I Pincl4a ;ui Pin elld._ ur .. Pinellas Co... FI rlriir}E Cwt rtnlafit pr lc Fdii TQcl.I? Help i Back ? - :" 's.;; f tSearch JFavorites Iviedia 'lam u_ ],Address) http_/Jpubgls.co.pinellas.fl us/public gis/ c>Go Links *NEW TOOLBAR HELP* Query Tips Contact Info Disclaimer ! Home Pinellas County GIS Query by Address go IE? Parcel Polygons - OFF . R ,a =, 'NOTE: Double-ClickGioupstoEapan E ? r ; I ?? f= ? GENERAL ... . _ ... . BUSINESS Parcel Report for: ! I - - ? G Close Window I I ! - - - - ?i 1 2710 GULF TO BAY BLVD 3 17/29/16/66373/000/0030 41 i Property Appraiser Tas Collector : i ,. . Municipality: Clearwater r Zonings Not applicable ( Comp.Land Use: Not applicable a Acreage: 1.567 i i ! Tau District: CW - Voter Precinct: 607 Fire District: 05 - Clearwater I r Evac Level: NON EVAC Census Block: l Census Tract: '- Zipcode: 33759 i within 750ft of Eagle Nest: NO ! within I500ft of Eagle Nest: NO I C - Parcel Polygons : Parcel Id:172916000002300500-Site Address: 20967 US HIGHWAY,;19 N-Zipcode 33759-Municipality: Clearwatei-Z 1 'F ?r al Poluaon erred i.IS2 aryl x,1,746' (lkj 1 s C. - Ini rr, t - ly, StOrt, j,?s j abiboi:-,:ti -, ii I}rl. fr PIII ?1 tlrllllt{I r??i !1fT1?111» l '- Aicl ?rPERAAIT PLc. { PIll?ll??_; run ?: r PiliG :a, ellos Co- ?' 1 1 F'J *NEW TOOLBAR HELP* I Query Tips I Contact Info I Disclaimer I Home Pinellas County GIS Query by Address J? -go 1? Parcel Polygons - OFF Lam. ._•--Jn_y:__»t _._ _ ,._._. -- ?X =DREW ST : i R • _ -- - .. . .... D EW ST _ Parcel Report for; " I ' 0 Close Window 77 2680 GULF TO BAY BLVD 17/29/16/66373/000/0020 , l Nl ; .._._ ; t ' , Taa Collector Property Appraiser - - L_.._._....? i . I l : ._... ._ e Municipality- Clearwater _ ... E Zoning: Not applicable ...... ..... T -- Comp.Land Use: Not applicable ••---- Acreage- 1.649 J f ! Tax District: CW .. III '•• ....... -: Voter Precinct: 607 3 i t Fire District: 05 - Clearwater , ": ' \ ? z i -- I - Evac Level: NON-EVAC Census Block- i Census Tract: ipcode:. 33759 ............... ............. ' ;i j L i -----e - f r- _ ?__ .. . thin 750ft of Eagle Nest- NO 7 y _? m _ ? ? thin I500ft of Eagle Nest- NO --- I I ? 0 2 Color Aerials i{! 3 CITIES - -' - I! Gcunty Outline Sold -.. j1 'Faccek - - - - --- Done. i V_IntrErrf lalinit?rL',?? artm?nt ;., r »I 1 C? ;? - ? -t* }4 F+?. 5tar.?? ? J J??cr?,.. "? P??,, = ? 8 ??rPERlJIT*PL... q F'in?#Ix.t_uun. PinellasCcur? Pin¢Ils?s Go... i "1rVdCtte [' e 7iit Vii3w Favorites To. r- H. w Back - -P • ! y r ':Search -- Favorites Media • " - ' Go Links Address c http://pubgis.co.pinellas.fl.us/public-gis/ *NEW TOOLBAR HELP* I Query Tips (Contact Info I Disclaimer I Home Pinellas County GIs 0 Query by Address?lrw AJl Parcel Polygons - OFF I R o 4+ a qx x ® a a© ?"7 Rz 9b Iml 99 A x p d Q Groups to Expan ?? L 'NOTE: Double-Click, l ' ?p? GENERAL i BUSINESS Parcel Report for: G ? Close Window { 2670 GULF TO BAY BLVD 17/29/16/66373/000/0010 - Property Appraise Tax Collector r .. _'- I Municipality: Clearwater "?----- Zoning: Not applicable • Comp.Land Use: Not applicable ' ! I 3-___..._ i Acreage: 0.698 .. ........ ..... _ i - Tax District: Cw , E Voter Precinct: 607 "'""'° _ I ; E t .......-..._ Fire District: 05 - Clearwater ¥ Evac Level: NON-EVAC -' ---' Census Block: - i Census Tract: Zipcode: 33759 within 750ft of Eagle Nest: NO £ within 1500ft of Eagle Nest: NO l r ........ .................. • P?rrPJ Paluaons Parcel Id 17291bt700002301100-Site Address: 430 PARK PLACE BLVD Zbcode: 33759-klurii6oality: Clearwater-Zorun `Patel Polvome selected 1 : 3,152 ,2.791 x 1Y48 (kl J0m?® ?? ?? Internet 1 MInbox - l ICr APERMIT*Pl- 9Plnellas Coun J 10DPinelias Coun.•. Pinellas Co.. +] Planning Departments ' ? ? fT ? 12:14 PM -- - -- --- - _-?-- -- - -- - -_- ?de - 33753-M --unicipality CI -earw-ater Z-oning: Zo ?l 'Parcel Polygons' selected ;1 : 3. - el Polygons : Parcel td. 172916IT00002300100-Site Address: 380 PARK PLACE- -Zipco- I Done 1 -- { I-- Internet pi? 12:14 PM l'?Start ' In ox - Mlcr... 'AkPERMIT PL.. i'lPinellasCoun ,.. Pinellas COUR., Pinellas Co .. Plannm Department ?? Q F '._ Edit View I o 1s ! ` F Parcel Polygons : Parcel Id: 1 7291 6000002301 1 00-SdeAddress: 430 PARK PLACE BLVD Zipcode: 33759-Municipality: Clearwater•Zonin 1 'Parcel Polygons' selected 1 : 3,15-2 12,791 x 1,749 (it] 4 Internet ! IF `St ort -11 ?Inbox - Mier...PER/AIT PL.,, k?Pinellas Caun ?DVI Pineifas Coun Planning Department l 12:15 F _-? F1ks, Edit Vii i F iu,i 0A- H,4 (: Back y Search (1-Favorites Media 1 . . (_%61 - ---I Parcel Polygons : Parcel Id: 1 8291 6000001 1 01 300-SReAddress: 21154 US HIGHWAY 19 N-Zipcode. 33765-Municipality: Gearwater-Zo 1 Parcel Poygons selected 11 :6,304 5,581 x 3,497 (R) ---- __ FF! 4Intemet Planning Department .. 1 ... Pinellas Coun... Inbox -A ICr ... .tart Ej "I? .. I + PERMIT* Pineilas Coun PL I I - Pinellas Co... 12:20 PM t III, T % pc rT 1 `lr r Back ? !;+ ? ?, Search )Favorites `? 'j Media L AddressFchttp://pubgis.co.pinellas.fl.us/public-gis/ *NEW TOOLBAR HELP* uer Pinellas County GIs Query by Address go ? Parcel Polygons 9 ® Q+ 'k lk ' x ?? 0 fi "I Eb Lam!' -, r: 'lam INOTE_;_Double-Click Groups toExpanp ]f-z:7 GENERAL t BUSINESS .,l - r -1ul_..J ?X Close Window 380 PARK PLACE 17/29/16/00000/230/0100 i Property Appraiser Tax .Collector Municipality: Clearwater Zoning: Not applicable Comp.Land Use: Not applicable Acreage: 6.809 Tax District: CW ( } Voter Precinct: 607 Fire District: 05- Clearwater Evac Level: NON-EVAC Census Block: Census Tract: Zipcode: 33759 within 750ft of Eagle Nest: NO within 1500ft of Eagle Nest: NO P 1 P el 729160 0104 S" `Add 380 F E t 3M I;t CI -7 "Z 1'P IP I I rA ?Go Links " Contact Info I Disclaimer I Home ! nFF A h d 1_. I r i ' ; 9 page oygons. arc Id.l 0000230 tte ress_ untctpaty. eatwaer oning. a arce oy7on: se ec_ 1F '.:y1 41;748i I #?Si©rt x °'®» Int , ?J icr... PEFJI,IT"PL.?F ?r?< Ila uri..?. ?d?PfnellasCourr?.. Pinellas Co. 'Planning DeparlmLnt "? ; f elk, _ „, r Back ? (t v Search ?-*IFavoritesMedia Address http:JJpubgis.co.pinellas.fl.usjpublic_gisJ ?Go 'Links " :. - __-- .co T l ----- .*NEW TOOLBAR HELP* I Query Tips ( Contact Info I Disclaimer I Home Pinellas County GIS Query by Address 90 Parcel Polygons ?? - - UFF D = NOTE: Double-Click Gro s Lc Ex an - - ?? 3 GENERAL 0 f ?5 BUSINESS C _ © Close Window E 3 R ' 300 S PARK PLACE BLVD 17/29/16/00000/230/0130j1 r C , ( . Property Appraiser Tam Collector C i] Municipality: Clearwater Zoning- Not applicable I t Comp.Land Use: Not applicable 1 Acreages 7.486 Tax District: CW i ? Voter Precinct: 607 i I f Fire District: 05- Clearwater ..-_- . - I ' Evac Level: NON-EVAC i r Census Block: Census Tract: Zipcode: 33759 -?- '---"--""- E [ . i within 750ft of Eagle NO (l r Nest: ? £ i ? within I500ft of Eagle NO l - - `: * Nest: I f SR &0 Pa:c?4Folyaon Fare iId 17251RFM0023001011S4eAddre. 3 e0F4AR FL. _rF-Zipcode.33759tduri,-jpal9y Clr-wa tei-e'.oning.Zo 1'F7rcclF'ol,s_r_'selected 3,152 2,791 x1;748 Of) j :;: t i j » r . _ s },., PER?h.IT*PL.:. Pire l '? our °Pir Ella C--,un Pinellas Co.. F'I.?rr ing De,,. rtrti?nt "'A'4 WJ r R ^ 1 F. J, „tab or, - ?_." ® I rb A i 141a t.. File Edit View Favorit_-, Tools H? I'.- Back . . . v Itksearch t:?jFavoritesMedia r?Go Links Address ] http://pubgis.co.pinelles.fl.us/public gis/ g 'NEW TOOLBAR HELP' I Query Tips I Contact Into I aisclalmer I Home Pinellas County GIS Query by Address go I ? parcel Polygons (- , OFF F (k -a C( Q ---r_ o a a a ?","1 a RIC .? a Q NOTE: Double-Crick Groups to Expan; I I ; ?? ? 0 GENERAL 0 BUSINESS , .. r ? Close Window ( B ' 311 PARK PLACE BLVD _: : I ? " I 17/29/16/00000/240/0600 t 3 j i 1 f i 1 1 , tY , I Property Appraiser Tax Collector (,; ! Municipality: Clearwater ; Zoning: Not applicable ?'" ?' ' Comp.Land Use: Not applicable i-._---•'-' -__i _ Acreage: 9.446 I Tax District: CW Voter Precinct: 607 J 05- Fire District: Clearwater t Evac Level: NON-EVAC Census Block: I Census Tract: Zipcode: 33759 I within 750ft of Eagle Nest: NO 1....-... ! R'. i within 1500ft of Eagle NO s { I F Nest: _ ? . J 3 [ j _--------..._.--_ _v__ ----= Parcel Polygons; Parcel Id. 172916000002300100-SiteAddie= 380 PARK PLACEZipcode: 33759•MunicipaRy. CleaiwaterZoning._Zo 1 Parcel Polygons' selected 11:3,152 ,2,791 x 1,748 (R) jQStart j If E2 ®Inbox - Micr... 4PERMIT*PL...Pinellas Coun... Pinellas Coun- ^ ? ? ? ? Internet '' Pinellas Co... ?? Planning Department 12:16 PM n €7 I a*+- ?? a ?tlilCd ,:!.LT_Ll ,? I :?•, •.i) r ?(-V'1 'ia L4 T I?; t'ttr (f 7 ) Qt bvQtr', File Edit View Fct?ci i, s Help learch 'Favorites `r1'Media LF Back j .nQ S rM r j-;> Go ? Links » Address Z http://pubgis.co.pinellas.fLus/public_grs/ *NEW TOOLBAR HELP* I Query Tips I Contact Info I Disclaimer I Home Pinellas County GIS Cal Query by Address ?.? go 'a Parcel Polygons I OFF ?? c- NOTE: Double-Gluck Groups to Expan„ ! 2 9-?^7 GENERAL ?? BUSINESS ] DX fIel r?I?(((_ ParcReport for: j Close Window l I 17/29/16/00000/240/0400 I 41 nS Y t I' Property Appraiser TaH Collector € i l Municipality: Clearwater Zoning: Not applicable Comp.Land Use: Not applicable ' Acreage: 6.145 ? Tax District: Cw - ! Voter Precinct: 607 I O5 ' J 'i t Fire District: Clearwater ivacLevel: NON-EVAC Census Block: Census Tract: Zipcode: 33759 within 750ft of Eagle Nest: NO J ; Parcel Polygons : Parcel ld: 172916000002301100-UeAddress: 430 PARK PLACE BLVD-Zrpcode:,33759-Muniapa4ty, Clearwater Zonin (1 Parcel Polygons selected 11 : 3,152 ?2 791 x 1,748 (ftJ Internet nbox?- Mler... PERMIT'-?__ *PL... 4k)Pinellas C©un... Pinellas Coun.,, I Pln¢Ilos Co Planning Department "? F ? 12:16 PM 1, V, ep File Edit Vtev, Faw it_s IOOIS Held '.,= Back 14 ID 6 I Search Mt? Favorites OlMedie ,A z e a- 19 ill Address http://pubgis.co.pinelles.fl.us/public gis/ - rc?Go Links' *NFW Tnni RAR HFI P* I Oiip.rv Tins I C:nntar-t Info I Disclaimer I Home Pinellas County GIS Query by Address - go Parcel Polygons L-1 , OFF If q? ck? C< OQ M) A, X. c NOTE: Double-Click Groups to Ex an' D GENERAL i 21 JE 8 BUSINESS I 171 X , : . Parcel Report for, ! Close Window ; 101 S PARK PLACE BLVD --- - t 17/29/16/85546/000/0020 4 i I G yt 01 i I I 1, Property Appraiser Tax Collector , ! - Municipality: Clearwater l ` Zoning: Not applicable Comp.Land Use, Not applicable { l Acreage: 12.135 _._._......----. _.?.._..__ .? '. ,, -__..._._ , l _ Tam District: C W - i . Voter Precinct: 607 i ! 05- Fire District: Clearwater vac Level: NON-EVAC __..._ ____.._ _........ _. ._...._._, s {hr Census Block: i C Census Tract: ` E', Zipcode: 33759 within 750ft of Eagle NO t E. Nest _ r , , 1 i . r , J t Parcel Patygo s. Paicel.ld 172916Q0000 200200-Ske Address; 21227 US HIGHWAY 19 N Zip?de 33759-N{unioipaliiy: Clearwater-Zo 1 'Parcel Polygons' selected 13,152 ? j2.791 x 1,7A8 (ft) s i Iv .? i ?1?_Internet "PERMIT*PL,.. Plne{{as Coun.. 40] Pinellas Goun ,Start "° ® { '?Inbax - Micr„ Pinellas Co. ?? Planning DepartmentI® 12.17 PM F ? it, T File Edit View Tools P:dp Lki Back ,J1 Q ?"? f t Search f. Favorites Media I ? 'Addr'ess ] http://pubgis.co.pinellas.fl.us/public_gis/ - (Go Links " *NEW TOOLBAR HELP* I Query Tips Contact Info I Disclaimer Home Pinellas County GIS Query by Address ? Parcel Polygons ,OFF; ff ?? JN07E: Double•Click Graups to Expan' ?p GENERAL ! s ?? 3 BUSINESS Parcel Report for: - I C Close Window ! 3 { 100 S PARK PLACE BLVD t -.... i 17/29/16/85546/000/0030 l I C ` _ i v I Prooerri Appraiser Tax Collector 1 Municipality: Clearwater I. Zoning: Not applicable Comp.Land Use. Not applicable 1 _......_../ --_ :_. Acreage: 14.875 ... TasDistrict: CW 3 Voter Precinct: 607 Fire District: 05- Clearwater EE ? vac Level: NON-EVAC I -__...._._-_ - _-_._..._.. f . Census Block: 4 [I Census Tract: Zipcode: 33759 i within 750ft of Eagle NO I !I Nest: r . - r i ? - 2,791 x T748(ft) 152 Parcel Polygons: Parcel id: 172916655460WD030•SiteAddress: 100 S PARK PLACE BLVD Zipcode: 33759 -municipality. Clearwater-Zon 1 'Parcel Polygons selected 1 : 3( l l Internet I PERMIT*PL?1 Pinellas Coun.1.1 DPinellas Coun 4 Pinellas Co LPlanning Department "5 44 12.17 PM ;?QStart ' ® ®Inbox -Mier.,. File Edit Vievi j,'' Sack ( v f r Search *r Favorites Media F: Address] http://pubgis.co.pinellas.fl.us/public_gis/ ? Go ? Links " *NEW TOOLBAR HELP* I Query Tips I Contact Info I Disclaimer I Home Pinellas County GIs Query by Address i,? 90 Parcel Polygons l,- ; OFF q+qz x aaaou IM .?x:? 9 INOTE: Double-Click Groups to Expan i I ? i D f ?? GENERAL 211 BUSINESS I' - I Parcel Report for: G " O Close Window DREW ST 21 PARK PLACE BLVD 17/29/16/85546/000/0010 s ? Pronert4 Aooraiser Tax Collector 1 ? I Municipality: Clearwater Zoning: Not applicable ''. _ _ -- - _ - - Comp.Land Use: Not applicable ' A 18.253 e a g e is Tax D i s ict: ClM Voter Precinct: 607 Fire District: OS - Fire -vac Level: NON-EVAC Census Block: Census Tract: . Zipcode: 33759 ? . within 750Tt of Eagle NO Nest: , ? . ____...._____._... ,44 J i _.__--_____-. 1 P arcel Polygomt : Parcel Id: 172916M0002200100-Site Address: 21311 US HIGHWAY 19 N-Zipcode: 33759•Muni6pafity: Clearwater-Zo (1 'Pa(cel Polygons: selected 3,152 12,791 x 1,748 (ftJ ?x QS tart "I Inbox - Mler.. PERMIT*PL.' Pinellas Coun . 'Pinellas Coun Pinellas co... Piannin De artment ` ' 12:18 PJV, Tampa Bay Xegional Planning Council Chair Commissioner Barbara Sheen Todd July 21, 2003 Vice-Chair Secretary/Treasurer Executive Director Commissioner Steve Simon Commissioner Jane von Hahmann Manny L. Pumariega Mr. Kevin Smith Bausch & Lomb Surgical 21 Park Place Boulevard North Clearwater, FL 33759 Subject:. DRI #92 - Park Place, City of Clearwater Anniversary Month - September Dear Mr. Smith: RECjElVpl?% PLANNING DiEpAp C17 Y OF. CLEAR VV;'ERT Chapter 380.06(18), Florida Statutes, (F.S.), requires the developer of an approved Development of Regional Impact (DRI) to submit an annual report to the local government, the regional planning agency, the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) and any additional identified agency(ies) on the date specified in the Development Order. Our records indicate that the anniversary month for your annual report is September. Please check your Development Order, as it may include information requirements in addition to those required by the DCA (see enclosed annual report format). The annual report should also identify activities completed for the reporting year and activities proposed for the coming year. Pursuant to Chapter 9J-2.0252, Florida Administrative Code, the DCA DRI Review Fee Rule (enclosed - see (6)), please submit a check for $250.00 made payable to Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council, along with the annual report. The check must include the DRI name and number for identification purposes. It is noted that Subsection 380.06(18), F.S., indicates that if the local government does not receive the annual report or receives notification that the regional planning agency or the state land planning agency has not received the report, the local government shall request in writing that the developer submit the report within 30 days. The failure to submit the report after 30 days shall result in the temporary suspension of the development order by the local government. 9455 Koger Boulevard, Suite 219, St. Petersburg, FL 33702-2491 Phone (727) 570-5151 FAX (727) 570-51 18 State Number 513-5066 www,tbrpc. org 0 0 Please feel free to contact me if you have questions regarding this matter. Sincerely, J eyer DRI Coordinator JMM/bj Enclosures cc: Ms..Cynthia T_arapani Ms. Chris Papandreas, AICP • • Clearwater MEMORANDUM To: Community Development Board Members From: Gina Clayton, Manager, Long Range Planning Date: November 18, 2003 RE: DR12003-09001, 300 South Park Place Boulevard, Park Place DRI Attached please find the review conducted by the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council (TBRPC) and the Florida Department of Transportation staffs regarding the above application's consistency to the requirements for a Notice of Proposed Change (NOPC) to a Development of Regional Impact (DRI). Please find that TBRPC and FDOT staffs are satisfied with the information that has been submitted and do not object to the NOPC application. S: (Planning DepartmentIDOWNTOWN PLAN UPDATEIIst Amendment to Downtown Plan Wemo for the Summary Section of the Community Redevelopment Agency Downtown Plan Amendments Cover Memo.doc 1 ys • CITY OF CLEARWATE.R PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4576 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW September 16, 2003 Mr. Timothy A. Johnson, Jr. Johnson, Blakely, Pope, et.al. 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: Application for a Notice of Proposed Change (NOPC) to the Park Place Development of Regional Impact (DRI) requesting to extend the buildout date by five years to December 31, 2008. Dear Mr. Johnson: The Planning Department has reviewed your application for the Notice of Proposed Change for the Park Place DRI (DRI2003-09001). After a preliminary review, staff determined that the application is complete. The application has been entered into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number DRI2003-09001. The following schedule has been tentatively established for the review of your application by various City boards. These meetings are necessary in order to process your request appropriately. The attendance by you or your client is required at the Development Review Committee and Community Development Board meetings. Should any of the following meeting times and/or locations change you will be contacted immediately. 9/18/03 Development Review Committee, time to be determined (Please call Sherrie Nicodemus at 727.562.4582 no earlier than one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed.); in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the municipal service building, 100 South Myrtle Avenue in Clearwater. The case will be forwarded to the Community Development Board when it is deemed sufficient. 10/21/03 Community Development Board, meeting starts at 2:00 p.m. in the City Commission Chambers on the 3`d Floor of City Hall at 112 S. Osceola Avenue. BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER How HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER BILL JONSON, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" 1 August 27, 2003 Johnson - Page Two 11/20/03 City Commission (first reading), meeting starts at 6:00 p.m. in the City Commission Chambers on the 3`d Floor of City Hall at 112 S. Osceola Avenue. 12/4/03 City Commission (second reading), meeting starts at 6:00 p.m. in the City Commission Chambers on the 3`d Floor of City Hall at 112 S. Osceola Avenue. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4553 Sincerely, zg"? -- Marc A. Mariano Planner, Long Range • • JOHNSON, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, P.A. ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW E. D. ARMSTRONG III BRUCE H. BOKOR JOHN R. BONNER, SR.* GUY M. BURNS JONATHAN S. COLEMAN MICHAEL T. CRONIN ELIZABETH J. DANIELS BECKY FERRELL-ANTON COLLEEN M. FLYNN MARION HALE SCOTT C. ILGENFRITZ FRANK R. JAKES TIMOTHY A. JOHNSON, JR. SHARON E. KRICK ROGER A. LARSON JOHN R. LAWSON, JR* LEANNE LETIZE MICHAEL G. LITTLE MICHAEL C. MARKHAM STEPHANIE T. MARQUARDT ZACHARY D. MESSA A.R. "CHARLIE" NEAL TROY J. PERDUE F. WALLACE POPE, JR. ROBERT V. POTTER, JR. AUDREY B. RAUCHWAY DARRYL R. RICHARDS PETER A. RIVELLINI DENNIS G. RUPPEL* CHARLES A. SAMARKOS PHILIP M. SHASTEEN JOAN M. VECCHIOLI STEVEN H. WEINBERGER JOSEPH J. WEISSMAN *OF COUNSEL PLEASE REPLY TO CLEARWATER FILE No. 44384.107090 September 22, 2003 Via Hand Delivery Mr. Marc A. Mariano, Planner City of Clearwater Planning & Development Services 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 Re: Park Place DRI NOPC Application Dear Marc: Thank you for calling to our attention the scrivener's error in the DRI legal description. Enclosed are 15 sets of the revised legal description with the call that was changed highlighted for your information. By copy of this letter, I am forwarding the revised legal description to the other reviewing agencies and consultants. Sincerely, Jayne E. Sears Legal Assistant encl. cc w/encl #301562 v1 CLEARWATER OFFICE 911 CHESTNUT ST. POST OFFICE BOX 1368 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33757-1368 TELEPHONE: (727) 461-1818 TELECOPIER: (727) 462-0365 Mr. John Meyer, TBRPC Ms. Marina Pennington, DCA Mr. Al Navaroli, Pinellas County Mr. Ramon Solis, Pinellas County Mr. Kent Fast, FDOT Mr. George Deakin, Kimley-Horn & Assoc. Ms. Maura Minges, Bausch & Lomb Mr. Nick Shackleton, Park Place Land Robert Pergolizzi, AICP TAMPA OFFICE 100 N. TAMPA ST. SUITE 1800 POST OFFICE BOX 1100 TAMPA, FLORIDA 33601-1 100 TELEPHONE: (813) 22.5-2500 TELECOPIER (813) 223-7118 Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. Land Development Consulting • Engineering • Planning • Transportation • Permitting ICOT Center 13825 ICOT Boulevard, Suite 605 Clearwater, FL 33760 Phone: (727) 524-1818 Fax: (727) 524-6090 September 12, 2005 Mr. John Meyer, AICP, DRI Coordinator Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council 4000 Gateway Centre Boulevard, Suite 100 Pinellas Park, FL 33782 Re: Park Place (DRI # 92) 2004/2005 Annual Report Dear Mr. Meyer: ka?Y? Place. Please find enclosed one (1) copy of the 2004/2005 DRI Annual Report for the reporting period ending September 1, 2005. Also enclosed is the $250 review fee check Sincerely, Robert Pergohzzi CP Principal Cc: Brenda Winningham, Florida Department of Community Affairs 'Michael Delk, City of Clearwater Nick Shackleton, Carmel Commercial Group Dione Baker, Bausch & Lomb Jayne Sears, Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel, & Burns, LLP File 03-006 / fi t?l SEP 1 4 2005 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT r SERVICES CM' CF CLEARWATER s? DrQ,?? G-udT Coamt Conaudflng, llneo PARK PLACE (DRI NO. 92) CLEARWATER, FLORIDA DRI ANNUAL STATUS REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 1, 2005 SEPTEMBER 2005 PREPARED FOR: Carmel Commercial Group Continental Plaza 3250 Mary Street, 5th Floor Coconut Grove, FL 33133 and Bausch & Lomb 21 Park Place Boulevard Clearwater, FL 33759 PREPARED BY: GULF COAST CONSULTING, INC. Project # 03-006 September 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................. I II. ANNUAL STATUS REPORT .......................................................... I III. EXHIBITS .......................................................................................... 5 EXHIBIT A - SUMMARY OF DEVELOPMENT ORDER CHANGES EXHIBIT B - REVISED MASTER PLAN EXHIBIT C - SUMMARY OF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY EXHIBIT D - OWNERSHIP EXHIBIT E - LANDS PURCHASED ADJACENT TO DRI EXHIBIT F - PERMITTING INFORMATION EXHIBIT G - COMPLIANCE WITH DEVELOPMENT ORDER CONDITIONS I. INTRODUCTION _ This annual status report has been prepared pursuant to the requirements contained within the Park Place DRI (DRI No. 92) Amended Development Order (as originally adopted by the City ' of Clearwater on September 1, 1983; amended and adopted October 20, 1983, and re-adopted December 8, 1983) and as further amended by NOPC applications approved by the City of Clearwater via Ordinance # 5142-91 (December 19, 1991), Ordinance # 5722-95 (January 19, 1995), Ordinance # 6107-96 (November 21, 1996), and Ordinance 6678-01 (February 1, 2001). This report is being submitted simultaneously to the City of Clearwater (local government) the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council (TBRPC), and the Department of Community Affairs, Division of Resource Planning & Management, Bureau of State Planning (DCA). II. ANNUAL STATUS REPORT Report period September 1, 2004 to September 1, 2005. Month/Day/Year Month/Day/Year Development: Park Place (DRI No. 92) Location: Clearwater Pinellas City County Developer: Name: Bausch & Lomb Address: 21 Park Place Boulevard Clearwater, FL 33759 1. DESCRIBED ANY CHANGES MADE IN THE PROPOSED. PLAN OR DEVELOPMENT, PHASING, OR IN THE REPRESENTATIONS CONTAINED IN THE APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL SINCE THE DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT RECEIVED APPROVAL. NOTE ANY ACTIONS (SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION DETERMINATION) TAKEN BY LOCAL GOVERNMENT TO ADDRESS THESE CHANGES. Previous NOPC applications have extended the build-out date, modified the land use mixture to include light industrial uses (Bausch & Lomb), multi-family residential uses, and established trade-off mechanisms within the DR1. The NOPC adopted on February 1, 2001, reduced approved retail and office space, added a land use conversion factor for Parcel 6 to allow, multi-family or hotel, and extended the build-out date to December 31, 2003. That NOPC modified Map H (dated September 18, 2000) to include a total of 81,120 s.f retail commercial, 390 multi-family units, 685,759 s.f. office, 200,000 s.f industrial park. During ' the 2003-2004 reporting year, an additional NOPC was filed on September 11, 2003 by Bausch & Lomb to extend the build-out date to December 31, 2008.This NOPC modified Map H (revised August 22, 2003) to note the new build-out date. The NOPC was approved by the Clearwater City Commission on January 15, 2004 (ordinance # 7215-03). Please see Exhibit A. 2. HAS THERE BEEN A CHANGE IN LOCAL GOVERNMENT JURISDICTION FOR ANY PORTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT SINCE THE DEVELOPMENT ' ORDER WAS ISSUED? IF SO, HAS THE ANNEXING LOCAL GOVERNMENT ADOPTED A NEW DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT DEVELOPMENT ORDER FOR THE PROJECT? PROVIDE A COPY OF THE ORDER ADOPTED BY THE ANNEXING LOCAL GOVERNMENT. No. The City of Clearwater is the local government. 3. PROVIDE COPIES OF ANY REVISED MASTER PLANS, INCREMENTAL SITE PLANS, ETC., NOT PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. A copy of Ordinance # 7215-03, which approved the revised Map H (revised August 22, 2003), is included. Please see Exhibit B. 4. PROVIDE A SUMMARY COMPARISON OF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY PROPOSED AND ACTUALLY CONDUCTED FOR THE REPORTING YEAR, AS WELL AS A CUMULATIVE TOTAL OF DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED AND ACTUALLY CONDUCTED TO DATE. During the reporting year between September 1, 2004 and September 1, 2005, there was redevelopment activity within Park Place. Please see Exhibit C. 5. HAVE ANY UNDEVELOPED TRACTS OF LAND IN THE DEVELOPMENT (OTHER THAN INDIVIDUAL SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS) BEEN SOLD TO A SEPARATE ENTITY OR DEVELOPER? IF SO, IDENTIFY TRACT, ITS SIZE AND THE BUYER. PROVIDE MAPS WHICH SHOW THE TRACTS INVOLVED. No property was sold during the reporting year. Exhibit D contains a listing of current property owners. 6. DESCRIBED ANY LANDS PURCHASED OR OPTIONED ADJACENT TO THE ORIGINAL DEVELOPMENT OR REGIONAL IMPACT SITE, SUBSEQUENT TO ISSUANCE OF THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER. IDENTIFY SUCH LAND ITS SIZE AND INTENDED USE ON A SITE PLAN AND MAP. 1 No lands adjacent to the DRI have been purchased or optioned by the current owners of property within the Park Place DRI to the best of our knowledge. ' 7. LIST ANY SUBSTANTIAL LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL PERMITS WHICH HAVE BEEN OBTAINED, APPLIED FOR, OR DENIED, DURING THIS REPORTING PERIOD. SPECIFY THE AGENCY, TYPE OF PERMIT AND DUTY FOR EACH. During the reporting year certain minor permits were obtained. Exhibit F contains permitting information. 8. PROVIDE A LIST SPECIFYING EACH DEVELOPMENT ORDER CONDITION AND EACH DEVELOPER COMMITMENT, AS CONTAINED IN THE ADA, AND STATE HOW AND WHEN EACH CONDITION OR COMMITMENT HAS BEEN COMPLIED WITH DURING THE ANNUAL REPORTING PERIOD. Please see Exhibit G "Compliance with Development Order Conditions and ADA ,. Commitments". 9. PROVIDE ANY INFORMATION THAT IS SPECIFICALLY REQUIRED BY THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE ANNUAL REPORT. In addition to items required by the Annual Report form, the Park Place Development Order specifically requires each Annual Report to include the following: "a discussion of all development activities proposed to be conducted ... for the year immediately subsequent to the submission of the Annual Report" Site Plan approval was granted for an 85,000 s.f. office building on Parcel 6 on April 6, 2001, and re-approved without amendment in 2002. This approval has expired. New construction activity (redevelopment) took place during the reporting year at Parcel 9 (Parcel ID # 17/29/16/59392/001/0010) to include a restaurant / shops in a new building. and: "a statement listing anticipated applications for Development Approvals or Permits ...which the Developer proposes to submit during the year immediately following submittal of the Annual Report" The preparer has no knowledge of applications for further approvals to be submitted during the next reporting year. Park Place is substantially built-out with little developable land remaining. The lack of imminent development was the primary reason for filing the NOPC on September 11, 2003 to extend the build-out date to December 31, 2008. and: "a cumulative report of trade-offs made pursuant to Subsection 4.A.A hereof during the reporting year." No trade-off mechanisms were implemented during the reporting year. 10. PROVIDE A STATEMENT CERTIFYING THAT ALL PERSONS HAVE BEEN 1 SENT COPIES OF THE ANNUAL REPORT IN CONFORMANCE WITH SUBSECTIONS 380.06 (15) AND (18), F.S. I hereby certify that a copy of this annual report has been sent to the City of Clearwater, Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council, and the State Department of Community Affairs. Completed By: ' RobertPerg6 i ? ; AICP AICP #9023 Principal ' Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. III. EXHIBITS EXHIBIT A - SUMMARY OF DEVELOPMENT ORDER CHANGES EXHIBIT B - REVISED MASTER PLAN EXHIBIT C - SUMMARY OF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY EXHIBIT D - OWNERSHIP EXHIBIT E - LANDS PURCHASED ADJACENT TO DRI EXHIBIT F - PERMITTING INFORMATION EXHIBIT G - COMPLIANCE WITH DEVELOPMENT ORDER CONDITIONS EXHIBIT A - SUMMARY OF DEVELOPMENT ORDER CHANGES The Park Place DRI Development Order was originally approved by the City of Clearwater as Ordinance 3205-83 on September 1, 1983 for 150,000 s.f. retail uses and 1,103,000 of office space and have a build-out of 1991. To annex the project into the City the ordinance was amended and readopted as Ordinance 3287-83. Ordinance 5142-91 (adopted December 19, 1991) subsequently amended the Development Order and Master Plan to include 200,000 s.f of industrial uses, a maximum floor-area-ratio for the industrial use, a reduction of office space, a change of the phases and extension of the build-out date. Ordinance 5722-95 (adopted January 19, 1995) further amended the Development Order by changing the development to consolidate to one phase, decrease office space and extend the build-out date to 2000, adding a conversion factor to allow multi-family, and added a conversion factor from office and industrial to multi-family. The Development Order was amended by Ordinance 6107-96 (adopted November 21, 1996) to provide a land use conversion factor for Parcel 4. Ordinance 6678-01 (adopted February 1, 2001) amended the Development Order to extend the build-out date to December 31, 2003, establish a land use trade-off mechanism to allow hotel or multi-family on Parcel 6, in exchange for office space. On September 10, 2003, an NOPC application was filed and approved by the City of Clearwater to extend the build-out date to December 31, 2008. Ordinance # 7215-03 was approved January 15, 2004. Existing development includes: 81,120 square feet retail/commercial 304,639 square feet office 100,000 square feet industrial 390 multi-family residential units EXHIBIT B REVISED MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLANS 03-29-04 11:14am From-JOHNSON,POPE.PA 7274418617 T-039 P.02/08 F-570 ' ORDINANCE NO. 7216-03 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, ' FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 3205-83, AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE NO. 3287-83, ORDINANCE NO. 5142-91, ORDINANCE NO. 5722-95, ORDINANCE NO. ' 6107-96 AND ORDINANCE NO. 6678-01, A DEVELOPMENT ORDER. ISSUED PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 380, FLORIDA STATUTES, FOR PARK PLACE, ' A DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT; PROVIDING FINDINGS OF FACT; PROVIDING CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; EXTENDING THE BUILDOUT DATE; DETERMINING THAT SAID AMENDMENT IS CONSISTENT. WITH THE ADOPTED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; PROVIDING FOR PROPER NOTICE OF PROPOSED ENACTMENT; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on September 1, 1983, the City Commission adopted Ordinance No. 3205-83 (the "Development Order") which ordinance constitutes a development order for Park Place, a development of regional impact, affecting the property described on Exhibit. "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein (the "Development"); and WHEREAS, on October 20, 1983, the City Commission adopted Ordinance No. 3287-83, an amendment to the Development Order and readopted Ordinance No. 3287-83 on December 8, 1983; and WHEREAS, on December 1?1, 1991, the City Commission adopted Ordinance No. 5142-91, an Amendment to the Development Order; and WHEREAS, on January 19, 1995, the City Commission adopted Ordinance No. 5722-95, an Amendment to the Development Order; and WHEREAS, on November 21, 1996, the City Commission adopted Ordinance No. 6107-96, an Amendment to the Development-Order, and WHEREAS, on February 1, 2001, the City Commission adopted Ordinance No. 6678-01, an Amendment to the Devolopment Order; and WHEREAS, on September 10, 2003, Bausch and Lomb Incorporated and Park Place Land, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership, the owners of certain undeveloped areas of the Development, filed an application entitled "Notification of a Proposed Change to a Previously Approved Development of Regional Impact ("DRI") pursuant to Subsection 380.06(19), Florida Statutes" (the "NOPC") with the City of Clearwater (the "City"), with copies provided :o the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council (the "TBRPC") and the Florida Department of Community Affairs (the "DCA"); and I hereby certify that this is a true and -,..e. ".,sy of ehe nr;ginal is it =PearS is the funs of the city of clesrwm- Wien ss my hand and otfcisl seal of she ,pfCteora? es. T" of ` --' Ordinances No. 7215-03 >y C4 C3 Received Time Mar.29. 12:10PM 03-29-04 11:14am From-JOHNSON,POPE.PA 7274418817 T-039 P.03/08 F-570 WHEREAS, the NOPC proposes to amend the Development Order to extend the ' build-out date by five years to December 31, 2068 (the "Proposed Change"); and WHEREAS, the Proposed Change, combined wish previous amendments to the ' Development Order, is presumed to create a substantial deviation, pursuant to Subsection 380.06(19), Florida Statutes; and WHEREAS, the NOPC has satisfactorily addressed all regional issues relaters to the Development and the presumption ofa substantial deviation has been rebutted; and ' WHEREAS the City Commission as the governing body of the local government having jurisdiction pursuant to Chapter 380, Florida Stalules, is authorized and empowered to consider applications for proposed changes to previously approved DRIB; and ' WHEREAS, the public notice requirements of Chapter 380, Florida Statutes, and the City have been'satisfied; and WHEREAS, the City Commission has reviewed the NOPC, as well as all related testimony and evidence submitted by each party and members of the general public. ' j BE IT ORDAINED. BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1 _ Introduction - This Ordinance shall constitute an amendment to the Park Place Development Order as previously amended. Section 2. Findings - The City Commission, having received all related comments, testimony and evidence submitted by each party and members of the general public, finds that there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of`fact: A. The Park Place Development Order, as adopted by Ordinance No. 3205- 83, and"amended by Ordinances No. 3287 83, No. 5142-01, No. 5722-95, 6107-96 and 6678-01, is a valid final development order within the provisions of Section 163.3167(8) Florida Statutes, affecting the property ' described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein. B. Bausch. and Lomb Incorporated and Parts Place Land, Ltd., a Florida. limited w partnership, the owners of undeveloped portions of the DRI, have proposed that the, Development Order be amended to extend the build-out date by five years to December 31, 2008. z Orainance No. 121 b-W Received Time Mar-29, 12:10PM 03-Z9-04 11:14am From-JOHNSON,POPE.PA 7274418617 T-039 P.04/08 F-570 C. A comprehensive review of the impacts generated b by the Proposed Change, together with all previous amendments, has been conducted by the City's departments, the TBRPC and the DCA. D. The Proposed Change is not located in an area of critical state concern ' designated as such pursuant to Section 380.05, Florida Statutes (1993). E. The Proposed Change, together with all previous amendments, does not increase the external traffic impact of the development, nor- does it create additional impacts on other public facilities, including water, wastewater, drainage, solid waste, recreation and mass transit, from the original ' projections set forth in the Application for Development Approval ("ADA"). F. The Proposed Change. hereby. approved is determined not to be a substantial deviation to the Development Order. Section 3. Conclusions of Law - The City Commission, having made the above findings of fact, reaches the following conclusinns, of law: A. The Development as built to date is consistent with the local ,. comprehensive plan and local land development regulations under which it was developed. B. The Development as modified herein, and as depicted on the Revised Map H, Master Plan, attached hereto as Exhibit B, will not unreasonably interfere with the achievement of the objectives of the adopted state land ' development plan applirahle to the area. C. The Proposed Change is consistent with the local land development regulations currently in effect. U. I he Proposed Change, together with all previous amendments, does not create a reasonable likelihood of additional impact or any type of regional impact not previously reviewed by the TBRPC and DCA, over those treated under the Development. Order. The Proposed Change, therefore, does not constitute a "substantial deviation" from the Development Order, pursuant to Chapter 380.06, Florida Statutes. The Proposed Change is exempt from the provisions of Ordinance No. 4933-90, City of Clearwater and the Park Place DRI remains vested thereunder. E. Nothing herein shall limit or modify the rights originally approved by the ' Development Order or the protection afforded under Section 163.3167(8), Florida Statutes, except to the extent that specific rights and protections are limited or modified by the Proposed Change to the Development Order as . ' approved by this ordinance.' 3 Ordinance No. M15-03 Received Time Mar.29. 12:104 03-29-04 11:14am From-JOHNSON,POPE.PA 7274418617 T-039 P.05/08 F-570 F. The Proposed Change s within the 1 the threshold guidelines of Ordinance No. 4983-90 of the City, relating to determinations of vested development rights, and the Park Place DPI remains vested thereunder. G_ These proceedings have been duly conducted pursuant to applicable law ' and regulations, and based upon the record in these proceedings, the various departments of the City, Bausch and Lomb Incorporated, Park Place Land, Ltd., and other owners of the Development are authorized to approve/conduct development as described herein. H_ The review by the City, the TBRPC, and other participating agencies and interested citizens reveals that impeacts are adequately addressed pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 380, Florida Statutes. Section 4. Order - Having made the above findings of fact and drawer the above conclusions of law, it is ordered that the Development Order be amended as follows: A. The Conceptual Plan described in Sections 4.A_ and 4.J, of the Development Order is amended to be as shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein. All references to the Corceptual Plan set forth in the Development Order shall refer to the Amended Conceptual Plan attached hereto as Exhibit B. B. The build-out date is hereby extended to December 31, 2008. C. The amendments stated herein, together with all previous amendments, do not constitute a substantial deviation, pursuant to Chapter 380.06, Florida Statutes. r U. Nothing herein shall limit or modify the rights originally approved by the Development Order or the protection afforded under Section 163.3167(8), Florida Statutes, except to the extent that specific rights and protections are limited or modified by the proposed amendments to the Development Order as approved by this ordinance. E. The City Cleric shall send copies of this ordinance; within five (5) days after passage of this ordinance on second reading to Bausch and Lomb Incorporated, Parr Place Land, Ltd.-, DCA and TBRPC. F. This ordinance shall be deemed rendered upon transmittal of copies hereof to the TBRPC and the DCA. G. Notice of adoption of this ordinance shall be recorded by the Developer in the public records of Pinellas County, Florida, as provided in Section 380.06; Florida Statutes. } 4 Ordinance No. 7216-03 Received Time Mar-29, 12:10PM 03-29-04 11:15am From-JOHNSON,POPE.PA 7274418617 T-039 P.06/08 F-570 Section 5_ Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect when filed as provided by law, unless this ordinance is appealed, in which event this ordinance shall not take effect until such appeal has been decided. PASSED ON FIRST READING December 18, 2003 PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED January 15, 2004 Man . Aungst Mayor-Commissioner Approved as to form- Leslie K. Dougal) S es Assistant City Attorney Attest C is E. Goudeau City Jerk 5 ordinance No. 7215-03 Received Time Mar.29. 12:104 ' 03-29-04 11 :]Sam From-JOHNSON,POPE.PA 7274418617 T-039 P.07/08 F-570 EXHIBIT "A" ' TO ORDINANCE NO. 7215-03 LEGAL DESCRIPTION. OF PARK PLACE Commence at the center of Section 17, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida and go S 89°46'01" W, 660.00 feet, along the South boundary of the Northwest 1 /4 of said Section 17 (the East-West centerline of said Section 17) thence N 00°19'21" W, 50.00 feet, to a point on the North right-of-way fine of Guff-to-Bay Boulevard -- State Road 60 for a POINT OF BEGINNING; thence, following said North right-of-way line, S 89°46'01" W, 58.49 feet; thence N 00°13'59" W, 10.00 feet; thence S 29-46-01" W, 1319.21 feet; thence, leaving said North right-of-way line, N 01 °04'04" E, 599.99 feet; thence S 89°46'01" W, 198.43 feet; thence N 00°52'2'1" E, 554.70 feet; thence S 89°54'49" W, 400.06 feet, to "a point on the East right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 19; thence, following Said East right-of-way line, N 01 °04'04" E, 28.15 feet; thence along a curve to the right: that has a radius of 192.00 feet, an arc length of 72.82 feet, a chord length of 72.39 feet, a chord bearing of N 11°56'04" E, thence N 22°47'58" E, 11.93 feet; thence along a curve to the left that has a radius of 238.00 feet, an arc length of 16.13 fcct, a chord length of 10.13 feet, a chord bearing of N 20°51'2/" !_, to a point on the North boundary of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17; thence, leaving said East right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 19, N 89°54'49" E, ' 1222.19 feet, along the North boundary of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 114 of said Section 17 to the Southwest comer of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 114 of said Section 17; thence N 00°22'28° E, 1337.33 feet, along the West boundary of the Northeast 114 of the Northwest 114 of Section 17 to the Northwest comer of said Northeast 114 of the Northwest 1/4; thence S 89°56'11" E, 1312.06 feet, along the North boundary of said Northeast 114 of the Northwest 114 to a point on the West right-of-way ' line of Hampton Road-- County Road 144; thence S 00°19'21" E, 2337.71 feet, along said West right-of-way line; thence S 89°46'01" W, 627.00 feet; thence S 00°10'21" E, 280.00 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING, containing 99.133 acres, more or less. r Subject to easements and rights-of-way of record. Information taken from survey by Lloveras, Baur & Stevens, Consulting Engineers-Land ' Surveyors, Clearwater, Florida, February 23, 1982. Received Time Mar.29. 12:10PM N PARCEL 3 0 O m ? Lri a 2 0 fF 0 EXISTING ACCESS PARCEL 1 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL 200,000 SF (100,000 SF EXISTING) _--EXISTING 3 ACCESS NATURAL AREA O PARCEL 2 v OJ MULTI-FAMILY 156 D.U. o-? (158 MULTI-FAMILY D.U. EXISn? Q Siiiiii@ MULTI-FAMILY 250 500 234 D.U. (734 MULTI-FAMILY D.U. EXIST) OFFICE 82,179 SF PARCEL 8 (82,170 SF EXISTING) OFFICE 101,900 SF PARCEL 4 (101,900 SF EXISTING) COMMERICAL (RETAIL) 55,278 SF PARCEL 7 (55,278 SF EXIST ON PARCELS 7 AND G) / Q? PARCEL 5 PARCEL 6 (170, 580 SF OFFICE EXISONO) (100,000 SF OFFICE PLANNED) 2,FEJEE 220,566 SF LAND USE EXISTING PLANNED TOTAL RETAIL/ COMMERICAL 81,120 SF 0 81,120 SF OFFICE 304,639 S 100,000 S 404,639 SF LT. INDUSTRIAL 100,000 SF 100,000 SF 200,000 SF MULTI-FAMILY 390 DU 0 DU 390 DU RESIDENTIAL 485,759 SF 200,000 SF 685,759 SF TOTAL 390 DU 0 DU 390 DU 0 Z 0 a g NOTES: 1. THE PROPOSED AMOUNT OF SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR INDIVIDUAL UNDEVELOPED PARCELS ARE BASED ON BEST AVAILABLE MARKET INFORMATION AND ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE. FUTURE THE AMOUNT OF TOTAL DEVELOPMENT, HOWEVER WILL NOT EXCEED THE AMOUNT OF DEVELOPMENT APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER. ACCESS 2. THAT PORTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT THAT REMAINS TO BE DEVELOPED IS REFERRED TO AS THE "PLANNED DEVELOPMENT'. THE BUILD-OUT DATE FOR THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND FOR THE TOTAL PROJECT IS DECEMBER 31, 2008. 3. CONVERSION RATES OF 1,000 SQUARE FEET OF LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT TO 633 SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT ARE HEREBY ESTABLISHED ON PARCEL 1 AS APPROVED BY ORDINANCE 015722-95 4. ANY MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WILL BE LIMITED TO PARCELS 2, 3, 6 AND 8. COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL 5. PARCEL 6 IS PLANNED FOR 100,000 SF OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT. CONVERSION RATES OF PARCEL 10 PARCEL 11 1,000 SF OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT TO 2.40 MULTI-FAMILY UNITS WITH A MAXIMUM OF 240 (14,SJ8 SF EXISTING) UNITS, OR 1,000 SF Of OFFICE DEVELOPMENT TO 2.44 HOTEL ROOMS WITH A MAXIMUM OF (1t.J0J SF E1asnNC) 244 UNITS ARE HEREBY ESTABLISHED FOR PARCEL 6 AS APPROVED BY ORDINANCE 6678-01. GULF-TO-BAY BOULEVARD COMMERCIAL 25,842 SF (RETAIL) (25.842 SF EXISTING) PARK PLACE DRI - MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN MAP H Gulf Coast Consultants, Inc. DATE: Land Development Consulting REVISED: FIGURE: AUGUST 22, 2003 it - DRAWN BY: 1 RAW EXHIBIT C SUMMARY OF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY During the reporting year from September 1, 2004 to September 1, 2005, new construction was initiated ' on Parcel 9. It included demolition of the former Key West Grill and construction of a new building containing a restaurant and shops. DRI PARCEL PARCEL ID # 1 2 17/29/16/85546/000/0010 17/29/16/85546/000/0020 3 17/29/16/85546/000/0030 4 17/29/16/00000/230/0130 5 17/29/16/00000/240/0600 6 17/29/16/00000/240/0400 7 17/29/16/00000/230/1100 8 17/29/16/00000/230/0100 9 17/29/16/59392/001/0010 10A 17/29/16/66373/000/0010 1013 17/29/16/66373/000/0020 11 C 17/29/16/66373/000/0030 11D 17/29/16/66373/000/0040 HE 17/29/16/66373/000/0050 EXHIBIT D OWNERSHIP PROPERTY OWNER Bausch & Lomb 21 Park Place Blvd. Clearwater, FL 33759 California State Teachers Retirement System c/o Parcdigm Tax Group 3645 Ruffm Road, # 310 San Diego, CA 92123 Same as Parcel # 2 Park Place Land, Ltd. c/o Carmel Commercial Group 3250 Mary Street, 5`h Floor Coconut Grove, FL 33133 Glenborough Fund VIII 400 South El Camino Real San Mateo, CA 94402 Park Place Building, Ltd. c/o Carmel Commercial Group 3250 Mary Street, 5 h Floor Coconut Grove, FL 33133 Glenborough Fund VIII 400 South El Camino Real San Mateo, CA 94402 Highwoods/Florida Holdings 3111 W. MLK Blvd., Suite 300 Tampa, FL 33607 K B Investment Holdings, Ltd. c/o Boulder Venture 2226 S.R. 580 Clearwater, FL 33763 Clant, Inc. P.O. Box 916464 Longwood, FL 37291 MAXIMUM APPROVED DEVELOPMENT 200,000 s.f. Light Industrial 156 Multi-Family Dwelling Units 234 Multi-Family Dwelling Units 101,900 s.f. Office 120,560 s.f. Office 100,000 s.f. Office 49,906 s.f. Retail 82,179 s.f. Office 5,372 s.f. Retail / Restaurant 11,303 s.f Restaurant on l0A & 10B. 14,539 s.f. Retail/ Restaurant on 11 C, 11 D, &11E. EXIMIT F _ PERMIT INFORMATION SEPTEMBER 1, 2004 - SEPTEMBER 1, 2005 PERMIT # DATE ADDRESS TYPE BCP2004-09154 September 9, 2004 2660 Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. Demo Key West Grill ' BCP2004-09163 September 9, 2004 2660 Gulf-to-Bay Blvd.. Cap off sewer BCP2004-12538 December 23, 2004 2660 Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. Construct 10,200 s.f building BCP2005-06615 June 17, 2005 2660 Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. Interior buildout, restaurant ' BCP2005-06621 June 17, 2005 2660 Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. Interior buildout, shops BCP2005-06685 June 24, 2005 2660 Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. Fire alarm BCP2005-06689 June 24, 2005 2660 Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. Mechanical hood ' BCP2005-07364 July 13, 2005 2660 Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. Plumbing BCP2005-07365 July 13, 2005 2660 Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. Install fire sprinkler ' BCP2005-04156 April 6, 2005 2670 Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. Remodel restaurant BCP2005-06445 June 13, 2005 2670 Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. Interior Demo BCP2005-07010 July 1, 2005 2670 Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. Dumpster enclosure ' BCP2005-08330 August 10, 2005 2670 Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. Roof BCP2005-08411 August 12, 2005 2670 Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. Tree removal BCP2005-08588 August 19, 2005 2670 Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. Install awning 1 BCP2005-08637 August 22, 2005 2670 Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. Install alarm BCP2004-10596 October 21, 2004 21 Park Place Blvd. Interior renovation ' BCP2004-12037 December 1, 2004 21 Park Place Blvd. Install fire alarm BCP2004-12610 December 28, 2004 21 Park Place Blvd. Install fire sprinkler BCP2005-01020 January 3, 2005 21 Park Place Blvd. Canopy BCP2005-07640 July 22, 2005 21 Park Place Blvd. Install fire alarm BCP2005-07761 July 26, 2005 21 Park Place Blvd. Install fire alarm OCL 0016655 September 27, 2004 380 Park Place Blvd., #210 Renew Occupational License BCP2004-09115 September 8, 2004 311 Park Place Blvd., #640 Fire alarm BCP2004-10063 October 4, 2004 311 Park Place Blvd., #640 Fire alarm BCP2004-12035 December 1, 2004 311 Park Place Blvd., #600 Interior remodel BCP2005-02227 February 8, 2005 311 Park Place Blvd., 9600 Fire sprinkler ' BCP2005-02540 February 22, 2005 311 Park Place Blvd., #600 Fire alarm BCP2005-08224 August 8; 2005 311 Park Place Blvd., #500 Security system OCL 0018612 July 1, 2005 311 Park Place Blvd., 9190 Renew Occupational License BCP2005-01082 January 5, 2005 430 Park Place Blvd., #600 Interior Demo BCP2005-01087 January 5, 2005 430 Park Place Blvd., #600 Interior Remodel ' BCP2005-02229 February 8, 2005 430 Park Place Blvd., #600 Fire sprinkler OCL 0017667 February 8, 2005 430 Park Place Blvd., #600 Renew Occupational License ' OCL 0017668 February 8, 2005 430 Park Place Blvd., #600 Renew Occupational License EXHIBIT G COMPLIANCE WITH DEVELOPMENT ORDER CONDITIONS AND ADA COMMITTMENTS ' All conditions of approval and Developers commitments, as contained in the Park Place DRI Development Order (amended January 15, 2004) and the ADA are still in effect and being met. A statement of compliance is included: ' SECTION 4 ' A AA B BB. BB Preliminary and Final Site Plans Submitted for each Phase and Consistent with the "Conceptual Plan." All development activity must receive the appropriate city approval consistent with the Master Development Plan (Map H). All development levels comply. Prior to issuance of any permit utilizing the conversion factors, DCA and TBRPC will be notified. Developer has complied. Conversion factors have not been utilized to date. All development shall be consistent with applicable land development codes. All development has been reviewed by City of Clearwater staff for compliance with codes. 1. Portion of Park Place Blvd. dedicated to City of Clearwater. Developer has complied. All of Park Place Blvd. is City right-of-way. 2. Portion of Park Place Blvd. constructed prior to Certificate of Occupancy for Parcels 4 or 6, no later than 12/31/98. Final segment of Park Place Blvd. was constructed, and accepted by City of Clearwater. C. Maximum floor area of 1,145,520 s.f. (795,520 office, 150,000 s.f retail, 200,000 s.f. light ' industrial) subject to conversion factors. ' Current floor area does not exceed allowable amounts. Developer has reduced the planned amounts further. CC. Mass transit requirements. Developer has constructed bus shelters on Park Place Blvd. Developer will continue to comply. ' D. Acquire land for ingress/egress west of the project. Access to the west was previously acquired and still exists. E. Funding commitments for transportation improvements prior to first Final Site. Plan approval after 1/19/95. ' All developer transportation funding commitments have been met. ' EE. Prior to issuance of any permit for Parcel 4, owner of Parcel 4 shall grant City a 10 foot easement for pedestrian ingress/egress. Developer has complied. FF. Parcel 4 is entitled to curb cuts on Park Place Blvd. for access purposes. Curb cut and left turn lane constructed with Park Place Blvd. construction. G. Funding commitments for transportation improvements. ' The developer has paid it's proportionate share and mitigated it's impacts. H. Requiring certain City cooperation. No action during the reporting year. 1. Deleted via Ordinance # 5142-91 1 J. Responsibility for all construction and improvements made on-site and maintenance thereof. ' Individual owners have continued to maintain respective their properties and any construction projects and are being monitored by City inspectors. K. Designated aquatic lands shall remain undisturbed, excepting as approved for use ' consistent with the City retention policies. No development activity has occurred affecting the aquatic lands. ' L. Measures to control water quality and erosion. Individual property owners have continued to maintain water quality and erosion. Any construction is monitored by City inspectors. M. Monitoring of on-site water quality in the project drainage system. 1 The issued SWFWMD permit contains water quality monitoring provisions where appropriate. Individual contractors are held responsible for compliance with conditions. N. Paved surfaces cleaned periodically as part of water quality maintenance. Paved surfaces are cleaned as needed by individual owners. O. Drainage plans required at time of Final Site Plan approval. All previously approved development complied with the City drainage requirements. Any future development will comply with Final Site Plan submittal requirements (including drainage plans). P. Final Drainage Plans to meet FGFWFC recommendations. All previously approved development has complied Future development will also comply. Q. Bicycle and pedestrian paths required. Sidewalks have been constructed on Park Place Blvd. R. Soil limitations corrected and mitigated, additional soils testing as required. All previously approved development activity complies with the stated requirement as a condition of plan approval by the City. S. Construction phased to keep any trees with active osprey nests in place through nesting season. Osprey nest has been successfully relocated. T. Capture-release program established and approved by FGFWFC for certain wildlife species. Developer has complied. A capture-release project approved by FGFWFC was completed December 6, 1991. U. Any historic or archeological resources discovered to be reported to appropriate state agency. All previously approved development complied. All future development will comply. V. Site Plans must include provisions for preservation and transplanting of tree clusters and individual trees where possible. All previously approved development complied. All future development will comply and undergo review by City arborist prior to approval. W. Encouragement of energy conservation measures. All previously approved development complied. All future development will comply as a condition of approval by the City. X. Maintenance of on-site wells. Y. Z. Well on Parcel # 2 required rerouting to provide fresh water. SWFWMD permit was issued and well repaired in prior reporting year. NOT APPLICABLE (City requirement) Contribution of proportionate share of construction costs for certain traffic improvements. The developer has paid its proportionate share and fully mitigated its transportation impacts. Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. Land Development Consulting -Engineering .Planning .Transportation .Permitting ICOT Center 13825 ICOT Boulevard, Suite 605 Clearwater, FL 33760 Phone: (727) 524-1818 Fax: (727) 524-6090 October 6, 2004 Mr. John Meyer, AICP, DRI Coordinator Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council 4000 Gateway Centre Boulevard, Suite 100 Pinellas Park, FL 33782 Re: Park Place (DRI # 92) 2003/2004 Annual Report Dear Mr. Meyer: Please find enclosed one (1) copy of the 2003/2004 DRI Annual Report for the reporting period ending September 1, 2004. Also enclosed is the $250 review fee check Sincerely, Robert Pergolizzi, ASP, Principal Cc: Marina Pennington, Florida Department of Community Affairs Cynthia Tarapani, City of Clearwater. Nick Shackleton, Carmel Commercial Group Maura Mingus, Bausch & Lomb Jayne Sears, Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel, & Burns, LLP File 03-006 P? E /F'? r= I? OCT 8? ?I ^?ING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF CLEARWATER I Q ?cI(I4 & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES _:ITY OF CLEARWATER 'yea ,,? /GIGS 0? I?aia s°. Cot ^o, <<* ' 1740 MELLON UNITED NATIONAL BANK JAG VENTURES, LTD. MIAMI, FLORIDA 63-964-670 3225 AVIATION AVE., STE. 700 9/28/2004 COCONUT GROVE, FL 33133-4741 a PAY TO THE Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council $ **250.00 a 0 ORDER OF - Two Hundred Fifty and 00/100********************************************************s****************?********* DOLLARS B Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council m s L o ? m MEMO Park Place IIA / DRI Annual Report submittal fee _ _ __ __ _ /? /` (?? /?!'? _ -`rte nm 11100 L74011'''1:0670096461: 009 L L3307411' JAG VENTURES, LTD. Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council 9/28/2004 1740 Date Type Reference Original Amt. Balance Due Discount Payment 09/28/2004 Bill 250.00 250.00 250.00 Check Amount 250.00 • Cash - JAG Ventures, Ltd. Park Place IIA / DRI Annual Report submittal fee 250.00 G-udT Coaaqt Conq-udflng, llneo PARK PLACE (DRI NO. 92) CLEARWATER, FLORIDA DRI ANNUAL STATUS REPORT For the Year Ending September 1, 2004 September 2004 PREPARED FOR: Carmel Commercial Group Continental Plaza 3250 Mary Street, 5th Floor Coconut Grove, FL 33133 Prepared by: GULF COAST CONSULTING, INC. Project # 03-006 September 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................. 1 II. ANNUAL STATUS REPORT .......................................................... 1 M. EXHIBITS .......................................................................................... 5 EXHIBIT A - SUMMARY OF DEVELOPMENT ORDER CHANGES EXHIBIT B - REVISED MASTER PLAN EXHIBIT C - SUMMARY OF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY EXHIBIT D - OWNERSHIP EXHIBIT E - LANDS PURCHASED ADJACENT TO DRI EXHIBIT F - PERMITTING INFORMATION EXHIBIT G - COMPLIANCE WITH DEVELOPMENT ORDER CONDITIONS L INTRODUCTION This annual status report has been prepared pursuant to the requirements contained within the Park Place DRI (DRI No. 92) Amended Development Order (as originally adopted by the City of Clearwater on September 1, 1983; amended and adopted October 20, 1983, and re-adopted December 8, 1983) and as further amended by NOPC applications approved by the City of Clearwater via Ordinance # 5142-91 (December 19, 1991), Ordinance # 5722-95 (January 19, 1995), Ordinance # 6107-96 (November 21, 1996), and Ordinance 6678-01 (February 1, 2001). This report is being submitted simultaneously to the City of Clearwater (local government) the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council (TBRPC), and the Department of Community Affairs, Division of Resource Planning & Management, Bureau of State Planning (DCA). H. ANNUAL STATUS REPORT Report period September 1, 2003 to September 1, 2004. Month/Day/Year Month/Day/Year Development: Park Place TE No. 92) Location: Clearwater Pinellas City County Developer: Name: Housing Trust Group ' Address: Continental Plaza 3250 Mary Street, 5 h Floor Coconut Grove, FL 33133 ' 1. DESCRIBED ANY CHANGES MADE IN THE PROPOSED PLAN OR DEVELOPMENT, PHASING, OR IN THE REPRESENTATIONS CONTAINED IN ' THE APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL SINCE THE DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT RECEIVED APPROVAL. NOTE ANY ACTIONS (SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION DETERMINATION) TAKEN BY LOCAL ' GOVERNMENT TO ADDRESS THESE CHANGES. Previous NOPC applications have extended the build-out date, modified the land use ' mixture to include light industrial uses (Bausch & Lomb), multi-family residential uses, and established trade-off mechanisms within the DRI. The NOPC adopted on February 1, 2001, reduced approved retail and office space, added a land use conversion factor for Parcel 6 to ' allow multi-family or hotel, and extended the build-out date to December 31, 2003. That NOPC modified Map H (dated September 18, 2000) to include a total of 81,120 s.f retail commercial, 390 multi-family units, 685,759 s.f office, 200,000 s.f industrial park. During ' the 2003-2004 reporting year, an additional NOPC was filed on September 11, 2003 by Bausch & Lomb to extend the build-out date to December 31, 2008.This NOPC modified Map H (revised August 22, 2003) to note the new build-out date. The NOPC was approved ' by the Clearwater City Commission on January 15, 2004 (ordinance # 7215-03). Please see Exhibit A. 0 0 2. HAS THERE BEEN A CHANGE IN LOCAL GOVERNMENT JURISDICTION FOR ANY PORTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT SINCE THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER WAS ISSUED? IF SO, HAS THE ANNEXING LOCAL GOVERNMENT ADOPTED A NEW DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT DEVELOPMENT ORDER FOR THE PROJECT? PROVIDE ACOPY OF THE ORDER ADOPTED BY THE ANNEXING LOCAL GOVERNMENT. No. The City of Clearwater is the local government. 3. PROVIDE COPIES OF ANY REVISED MASTER PLANS, INCREMENTAL SITE PLANS, ETC., NOT PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. A copy of Ordinance # 7215-03, which approved the revised- Map H (revised August 22, 2003), is included. Please see Exhibit B. 4. PROVIDE A SUMMARY COMPARISON OF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY PROPOSED AND ACTUALLY CONDUCTED FOR THE REPORTING YEAR, AS WELL AS A CUMULATIVE TOTAL OF DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED AND ACTUALLY CONDUCTED TO DATE. During the reporting year between September 1, 2003 and September 1, 2004, there was no new development activity within Park Place. Please see Map "H" in Exhibit B. 5. HAVE ANY UNDEVELOPED TRACTS OF LAND IN THE DEVELOPMENT (OTHER THAN INDIVIDUAL SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS) BEEN SOLD TO A SEPARATE ENTITY OR DEVELOPER? IF SO, IDENTIFY TRACT, ITS SIZE AND THE BUYER. PROVIDE MAPS WHICH SHOW THE TRACTS INVOLVED. During the reporting year Parcel 9 (Parcel ID #17/29/16/59392/001/0010) was sold to K B Investment Holdings. Exhibit D also contains a listing of current property owners. 6. DESCRIBED ANY LANDS PURCHASED OR OPTIONED ADJACENT TO THE ORIGINAL DEVELOPMENT OR REGIONAL IMPACT SITE, SUBSEQUENT TO ISSUANCE OF THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER. IDENTIFY SUCH LAND ITS SIZE AND INTENDED USE ON A SITE PLAN AND MAP. No lands adjacent to the DRI have been purchased or optioned by the current owners of property within the Park Place DRI to the best of our knowledge. 7. LIST ANY SUBSTANTIAL LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL PERMITS WHICH HAVE BEEN OBTAINED, APPLIED FOR, OR DENIED, DURING THIS REPORTING PERIOD. SPECIFY THE AGENCY, TYPE OF PERMIT AND DUTY FOR EACH. During the reporting year certain minor permits were obtained. Exhibit F contains permitting information. 1 0 r ' S. PROVIDE A LIST SPECIFYING EACH DEVELOPMENT ORDER CONDITION AND EACH DEVELOPER COMMITMENT, AS CONTAINED IN THE ADA, AND ' STATE HOW AND WHEN EACH CONDITION OR COMMITMENT HAS BEEN COMPLIED WITH DURING THE ANNUAL REPORTING PERIOD. Please see Exhibit G "Compliance with Development Order Conditions and ADA Commitments". 9. PROVIDE ANY INFORMATION THAT IS SPECIFICALLY REQUIRED BY THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE ANNUAL REPORT. In addition to items required by the Annual Report form, the Park Place Development Order specifically requires each Annual Report to include the following: "a discussion of all development activities proposed to be conducted ... for the year immediately subsequent to the submission of the Annual Report" Site Plan approval was granted for an 85,000 s.f office building on Parcel 6 on April 6, 2001, and re-approved without amendment in 2002. This approval has expired. No new construction activity took place during the reporting year. and: "a statement listing anticipated applications for Development Approvals or Permits ...which the Developer proposes to submit during the year immediately following submittal of the Annual Report" ' The preparer has no knowledge of applications for further approvals to be submitted during the next reporting year. Park Place is substantially built-out with little developable land remaining. The lack of imminent development was ' the primary reason for filing the NOPC on September 11, 2003 to extend the build-out date to December 31, 2008. and: "a cumulative report of trade-offs made pursuant to Subsection 4.A.A hereof during the reporting year." No trade-off mechanisms were implemented during the reporting year. 10. PROVIDE A STATEMENT CERTIFYING THAT ALL PERSONS HAVE BEEN SENT COPIES OF THE ANNUAL REPORT IN CONFORMANCE WITH SUBSECTIONS 380.06 (15) AND (18), F.S. I hereby certify that a copy of this annual report has been sent to the City of Clearwater, Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council, and the State Department of Community Affairs. Completed By: Robert Pergoli i, AICP #9023 Principal Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. M. EXHIBITS EXHIBIT A - SUMMARY OF DEVELOPMENT ORDER CHANGES EXHIBIT B - REVISED MASTER PLAN EXHIBIT C - SUMMARY OF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY EXHIBIT D - OWNERSHIP EXHIBIT E - LANDS PURCHASED ADJACENT TO DRI EXHIBIT F - PERMITTING INFORMATION EXHIBIT G - COMPLIANCE WITH DEVELOPMENT ORDER CONDITIONS CI C7 ' EXHIBIT A SUMMARY OF DEVELOPMENT ORDER CHANGES The Park Place DRI Development Order was originally approved by the City of Clearwater as Ordinance 3205-83 on September 1, 1983 for 150,000 s.f. retail uses and 1,103,000 of office space and have a build-out of 1991. To annex the project into the City the ordinance was amended and readopted as Ordinance 3287-83. ' Ordinance 5142-91 (adopted December 19, 1991) subsequently amended the Development Order and Master Plan to include 200,000 s.f of industrial uses, a maximum floor-area-ratio for the industrial use, a reduction of office space, a change of the phases and extension of the build-out date. Ordinance 5722-95 ' (adopted January 19, 1995) further amended the Development Order by changing the development to consolidate to one phase, decrease office space and extend the build-out date to 2000, adding a ' conversion factor to allow multi-family, and added a conversion factor from office and industrial to multi-family. The Development Order was amended by Ordinance 6107-96 (adopted November 21, 1996) to provide a land use conversion factor for Parcel 4. Ordinance 6678-01 (adopted February 1, 2001) amended the Development Order to extend the build-out date to December 31, 2003, establish a land use trade-off mechanism to allow hotel or multi-family on Parcel 6, in exchange for office space. ' Existing development includes: 81,120 square feet retail/commercial ' 304,639 square feet office 100,000 square feet industrial 390 multi-family residential units During the reporting year, an NOPC application was filed and approved by the City of Clearwater to extend the build-out date to December 31, 2008. ? r EXHIBIT B REVISED MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLANS 03-29-04 11:14am From-JOHNSON,POA 7274418617 T-039 P.02/08 F-570 ORDINANCE NO. 7216-03 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 3205-83, AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE NO. 3287-83, ORDINANCE NO. 5142-91, ORDINANCE NO. 5722-95, ORDINANCE NO. 6107-96 AND ORDINANCE NO. 6678-01, A DEVELOPMENT ORDER ISSUED' PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 380, FLORIDA STATUTES, FOR PARK PLACE, A DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT; PROVIDING ' FINDINGS OF FACT; PROVIDING CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; EXTENDING THE BUILDOUT DATE; DETERMINING THAT SAID AMENDMENT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE ' ADOPTED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; PROVIDING FOR PROPER NOTICE OF PROPOSED ENACTMENT; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE. ' WHEREAS, on September 1, 1983, the City Commission adopted Ordinance No. 3205-83 (the "Development -Order") which ordinance constitutes a development order ' for Park Place, a development of regional impact, affecting the property described on Exhibit. "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein (the "Development"); and ' WHEREAS, on October 20, 1983, the City Commission adopted Ordinance No. 3287-83, an amendment to the Development Order and readopted Ordinance No. 3287-83 on December 8, 1983; and ' WHEREAS, on December 1?1, 1991, the City Commission adopted Ordinance No. 5142-91, an Amendment to the Development Order; and ' WHEREAS, on January 19. 1995, the City Commission adopted Ordinance No. 5722-95, an Amendment to the Development Order; and ' WHEREAS, on November 21, 1996, the City Commission adopted Or dlnance No. 6107-96, an Amendment to the Development- Order; and ' WHEREAS, on February 1, 2001, the City Commission adopted Ordinance No. 6678-01, an Amendment to the Development Order, and ' WHEREAS, on. September 10, ' 1003, Bausch and Lomb Incorporated and Park Place Land, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership, the owners of certain undeveloped areas of the Development, filed an application entitled "Notification of a Proposed Change to a Previously Approved Development of Regional Impact ("DRI"} pursuant to Subsection 380.06(19), Florida Statutes" (the "NOPC") with the City of Clearwater (the "City"), with copies prodded ;o the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council (the "TBRPC") and the Florida Department of Community Affairs (the "DCA"); and I hemby certify that this is a tree sad ' -...-. e?.ar of ehe original ss it 2"ears is the tilas of the city of CItaT+yncr Who : my Aaad and offcibl seal Of f Cleoews at. 4 Crdinancc No. 7215-03 rxmtr tray a ' Received Time Mar-29. 12:10PM 03-29-04 11:14am From-JONNSON,POA 7274416617 . T-039 P.03/06 F-570 ' WHEREAS, the NOPC ro oses to amend the Development Order to extend the build-out date by five years to December 31, 2008 (the "Proposed Change"); and ' WHEREAS, the Proposed Change, combined with previous amendments to the Development Order, is presumed to create a substantial deviation, pursuant to Subsection 380.06(19), Florida Statutes; and WHEREAS, the NOPC has satisfactorily addressed all regional issues related to ' the Development and the presumption of a substantial deviation has been rebutted; and ' WHEREAS, the City Commission, as the governing body of the local government having jurisdiction pursuant to Chapter 380, Florida Statutes, is authorized and empowered to consider applications for proposed changes to previously approved ' DRIs; and WHEREAS, the public notice requirements of Chapter 380, Florida Statutes, and ' the City have been satisfied; and WHEREAS, the City Commission has reviewed the NOPC, as well as all related ' testimony and evidence submitted by each party and members of the general public. 1 BE IT ORDAINED. BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: ' Sggtlon 1 _ Introduction - This Ordinance shall constitute an amendment to the Park Place Development Order as previously amended. Section 2. Findings - The City Commission, having received all related ' comments, testimony and evidence submitted by each party and members of the general public, finds that there Is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact: A. The Park Place Development Order, as adopted by Ordinance No. 3205- 8:3, and amended by Ordinances No. 3287 83, No. 5142-01, No. 5722-95, 6107-96 and 6678-01, is a valid final development order within the provisions of Section 163.3167(8) Florida Statutes, affecting the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein. B. Bausch and Lomb Incorporated and Park Place Land, Ltd., a Florida. limited partnership, the owners of undeveloped portions of the DRI, have proposed that the Development Order be arriended to extend the build-out date by five years to December 31, 2008. J ' 2 orcainame No. 121b-03 ' Received Time Mar.29, 12:10PM 03-29-04 11:14am From-JOHNSON,POP?A 7274418617 T-039 P.04/06 F-570 ' C. A comprehensive review of the impacts generated by the Proposed Change, together with all previous amendments, has been conducted by the City's departments, the TBRPC and the DCA. ' D. The Proposed Change is not located in an area of critical state concern designated as such pursuant to Section 380.05, Florida Statutes (1993). ' E. The Proposed Change, together with all previous amendments, does not ' increase the external traffic impact of the development, nor-does it create additional impacts on other public facilities, including water, wastewater, drainage, solid waste, recreation and mass transit, from the original projections set forth in the Application for Development Approval ("ADA"). ' F. The Proposed Change hereby. approved is determined not to be a substantial deviation to the Development Order. Section 3. Conclusions of Law -The City Commission, having made the above findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law: ' A. The Development as built to date is consistent with the local comprehensive plan and local land development regulations under which it ' was developed. 1 B. The Development as modified herein, and as depicted on the Revised Map H, Master Plan, attached hereto as Exhibit "B," will not unreasonably interfere with the achievement of the objectives of the adopted state land development plan applir-.able to the .area. C. The Proposed Change is consistent with the local land development regulations currently in effect. ' U. I he Hroposed Change, together with all previous amendments, does not. ' create a reasonable likelihood of additional impact or any type of regional impact not previously reviewed by the TBRPC and DCA, over those treated under the Development Order. The Proposed Change, therefore, does not constitute a "substantial deviation" from the Development Order, pursuant to Chapter 380.06, F=lorida Statutes. The Proposed Change is exempt from the provisions of Ordinance No. 498 City of Clearwater and the Park Place DRI remains vested thereunder. E. Nothing herein shall limit or modify the rights originally approved by the ' Development Order or the protection afforded under Section 163.3167(8), Florida Statutes, except to the extent that specific rights and protections are limited or modified by the Proposed Change to the Development Order as . ' approved by this ordinance. ' 3 Ordinance No. M15-03 Received Time Mar.29. 12:104 03-29-04 11:14am From-JOHNSON,POP A 7274418617 T-039 P.05/08 F-570 F. The Proposed Change 1$ within the threshold guidelines of Ordinance No. 4983-90 of the City, relating to determinations of vested development rights, and the Park Place DRl remains vested thereunder. G. These proceedings have been duly conducted pursuant to applicable law and regulations, and based upon the record in these proceedings, the various departments of the City, Bausch and Lomb Incorporated, Paris Place Land, Ltd., and other owner: of the Development are authorized to approve/conduct development as described herein. H. The review by the City, the TBRPC, and other participating agencies and interested cifizens reveals that impacts are adequately addressed pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 380, Florida Statutes. Section 4. Order - Having made the above findings of fact and drawn the above conclusions of law, it is ordered that the Development Order be amended as follows: ' A. The Conceptual. Plan described in Sections 4.A. and 4.J. of the Development Order is amended to be as shown on Exhibit "B" attached • hereto and inoorporatod herein. Ali references to the Conceptual Plan set forth in the Development Order shall refer to the Amended Conceptual Plan ' attached hereto as E=xhibit "B." ' B. The build-out date is hereby extended to December 31, 2008. C. The amendments stated herein, together with all previous amendments, do ' not constitute a substantial deviation, pursuant to Chapter 380.06, Florida Statutes. ' Di Nothing herein shall limit or modify the rights originally approved by the Development Order or the protection afforded under Section 963.3167(8), Florida Statutes, except to the extent that specific rights and protections are ' limited or modified by the proposed amendments to the Development Order as approved by this ordinance. E. The City Cleric shall send copies of this ordinance; within five (5) days after passage of this ordinance on second reading to Bausch and Lomb Incorporated, Park Place Land, Ltd:_; DCA and TBRPC. F. This,: ordinance shall be deemed rendered upon transmittal of copies hereof to the TBRPC and the DCA. G. Notice of adoption of this ordinance shall be recorded by the Developer in the public records of Pinellas County, Florid;4, as provided in Section ' 380.06, Florida Statutes. i 4 Ordinance No. 7215-03 ' Received Time Mar•29, 12:10RM 03-29-04 1115am From-JOHNSON,PO A 7274418617 T-039 P-06/08 F-570 Section 5. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect when filed as provided by law, unless this ordinance is appealed, in which event this ordinance shall not take effect until such appeal has been decided. PASSED ON FIRST READING December 18, 2003 PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED January 1$, 2004 Approved as to form: Leslie K. Dougall S es Assistant City Attorney Brian . Aungst Mayor-Commissioner Attest: 0 (' -j C,* - 5-"' ?4 I "I-, Cy is E. Goudeau City Jerk 5 Ordinance No. 7215-o3 Received Time Mar•29. 12:10PM 03-29-04 11:15am From-JOHNSON,PO=-DA 7274418617 T-039 P.07/08 F-570 -EXHIBIT "A" TO ORDINANCE NO. 7215-03 LEGAL DESCRIPTION, OF PA CE 1 1 1 1 1 1 Commence at the center of Section 17, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida and go S 89°46'01" W, 660.00 feet, along the South boundary of the Northwest 1 /4 of said Section 17 (the East-West centerline of said Section 17) thence N 00°19'21" W, 50.00 feet, to a- point on the North right-of-way line of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard - State Road 60 for a POINT OF BEGINNING; thence, following said North right-of-way line, S 89°46'01" W, 58.49 feet; thence N 00°13'59" W, 10.00 feet; thence S 29-46'01' W, 1319.21 feet; thence, leaving said North right-of-way line, N 01 °04'04" E, 599.99 feet; thence S 89°46'01" W, 198.43 feet; thence N 00°52'21" E, 554.70 feet; thence S 89°54'49" W, 400.06 feet, to `a point on the Esat right-of-way Iine of U.S. Highway 19; thence, following Said East right-of-way line, N 01°04'04" E, 28.15 feet; thence along a curve to the right: that has a radius of 192_.00 feet, an arc length of 72.82 feet, a chord. length of 72.39 feet, a chord bearing of N 11 °56'04" E, thence N 22"47'58" E, 11.93 feet; thence along a curve to the left that has a radius of 238.00 feet, an arc length of 16.13 fcct, a chord length of 10.13 feet, a chord bearing of N 20°51'21" E, to a point on the North boundary of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17; thence, leaving said East right of-way line of U.S. Highway 19, N 89°54'49" E, 1222.19 feet, along the North boundary of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 114 of said Section 17 to the Southwest comer of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17; thence N 00°2'2'28" E, 1337.33 feet, along the West boundary of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 114 of Section 17 to the Northwest comer of said Northeast 114 of the Northwest 1/4; thence S 89°56'11" E, 1312.06 feet, along the North boundary of said Northeast 114 of the Northwest 114 to a point on the West right-of-way line of Hampton Road- County Road 144; thence S 00°19'21" E, 2337.71 feet, along said West right-of-way line; thence S 89°46'01" W, 627.00 feet; thence S 00°10'21" E, 280.00 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING, containing 99.133 acres,. more or less. Subject to easements and rights-of-way of record. Information taken from survey by Lloveras, Baur & Stevens, Consulting Engineers-Land Surveyors, Clearwater, Florida, February 23, 1982. Received Time Mar,29, 12:10PM . N L??O 0 250 500 EXISTING ACCESS °a O OX d' Z OFFICE 82,179 SF PARCEL 8 (82079 SF EXISTING) PARCEL 3 MULTI-FAMILY 234 D.U. (234 MULTI-FAWLY O.U. EXIST) PARCEL 1 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL 200,000 SF (100,000 SF EXISTING) _w_-EXISTING I ACCESS NATURAL AREA O ,PQ PARCEL 2 v? 0°J MULTI-FAMILY y 156 D.U. (158 MULTI-FAMILY D.U. EXIS1)? Q OFFICE 101,900 SF PARCEL 4 (101,900 SF EXISTING) COMMERICAL (RETAIL) 55,278 SF PARCEL 7 (55,278 SF EXIST ON PARCELS 7 AND 9) / T)F PARCEL 5 PA RL 6 580 SF OFFICE EXISTI000 SF OFFICE PLANNED) IEE 220,566 SF / LAND USE EXISTING PLANNED TOTAL RETAIL/ COMMERICAL 81,120 SF 0 81,120 SF OFFICE 304,639 S 100,000 S 404,639 SF LT. INDUSTRIAL 100,000 SF 100,000 SF 200,000 SF MULTI-FAMILY 390 DU 0 DU 390 DU RESIDENTIAL 485,759 SF 200,000 SF 685,759 SF TOTAL 390 DU 0 DU 390 DU D 0 M Z 0 a x NOTES: 1. THE PROPOSED AMOUNT OF SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR INDIVIDUAL UNDEVELOPED PARCELS ARE BASED ON BEST AVAILABLE MARKET INFORMATION AND ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE. FUTURE THE AMOUNT OF TOTAL DEVELOPMENT, HOWEVER WILL NOT EXCEED THE AMOUNT OF DEVELOPMENT APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER. ACCESS 2. THAT PORTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT THAT REMAINS TO BE DEVELOPED IS REFERRED TO AS THE 'PLANNED DEVELOPMENT'. THE BUILD-OUT DATE FOR THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND FOR THE TOTAL PROJECT IS DECEMBER 31, 2008. 3. CONVERSION RATES OF 1,000 SQUARE FEET OF LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT TO 633 SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT ARE HEREBY ESTABLISHED ON PARCEL 1 AS APPROVED BY ORDINANCE #5722-95 4. ANY MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WILL BE LIMITED TO PARCELS 2, 3, 6 AND B. COMMERCIA COMMERCIAL 5. PARCEL 6 IS PLANNED FOR 100,000 SF OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT. CONVERSION RATES OF PARCEL 10 PARCEL 11 1,000 SF OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT TO 2.40 MULTI-FAMILY UNITS WITH A MAXIMUM OF 240 (11.303 SF EXISTING) (14,539 SF EXISTING) UNITS, OR 1,000 SF OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT TO 2.44 HOTEL ROOMS WITH A MAXIMUM OF 244 UNITS ARE HEREBY ESTABLISHED FOR PARCEL 6 AS APPROVED BY ORDINANCE 6678-01. GULF-TO-BAY BOULEVARD COMMERCIAL 25,842 SF (RETAIL) (25,842 SF EXISTING) PARK PLACE DRI - MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN MAP H Gulf Coast Consultants, Inc. DATE: Land Development Consulting REVISED: FIGURE: AUGUST 22, 2003 Lit DRAWN BY: RAW • W EXHIBIT C SUMMARY OF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY During the reporting year from September 1, 2003 to September 1, 2004, no new construction was initiated. ? w • EXHIBIT D OWNERSHIP DRI PARCEL PARCEL ID # PROPERTY OWNER MAXIMUM APPROVED DEVELOPMENT 1 17/29/16/85546/000/0010 Bausch & Lomb 200,000 s.f. 21 Park Place Blvd. Light Industrial Clearwater, FL 33759 2 17/29/16/85546/000/0020 California State Teachers 156 Multi-Family ' Retirement System Dwelling Units 750 B Street, Suite 1500 San Diego, CA 92101 ' 3 17/29/16/85546/000/0030 Same as Parcel # 2 234 Multi-Family Dwelling Units 4 17/29/16/00000/230/0130 Park Place Land, Ltd. 101,900 s.f ' c/o Carmel Commercial Group Office 3250 Mary Street, 5`s Floor ' Coconut Grove, FL 33133 5 17/29/16/00000/240/0600 Glenborough Fund VIII 120,560 s.f. 400 South El Camino Real Office ' San Mateo, CA 94402 6 17/29/16/00000/240/0400 Park Place Building, Ltd. 100,000 s.ff, c/o Carmel Commercial Group Office 3250 Mary Street, 5`b Floor Coconut Grove, FL 33133 7 17/29/16/00000/230/1100 Glenborough Fund VIII 49,906 s.f. ' 400 South El Camino Real Retail San Mateo, CA 94402 8 17/29/16/00000/230/0100 Highwoods/Florida Holdings 82,179 s.f. 3111 W. MILK Blvd., Suite 300 Office Tampa, FL 33607 ' 9 17/29/16/59392/001/0010 K B Investment Holdings, Ltd. 5,372 s.f c/o Boulder Venture Retail / Restaurant 2226 S.R. 580 ' Clearwater, FL 33763 10A 17/29/16/66373/000/0010 Clant, Inc. 11,303 s.f Restaurant on 1011 17/29/16/66373/000/0020 P.O. Box 916464 10A & 10B. ' 11C 17/29/16/66373/000/0030 Longwood, FL 37291 14,539 s.f. Retail / 111) 17/29/16/66373/000/0040 Restaurant on 11C, I ID, 11E 17/29/16/66373/000/0050 & 11E. N 0 250 500 EXISTING ACCESS 0 0 w OFFICE 82,179 SF PARCEL 8 (82.179 SF EXISTING) OFFICE 101,900 SF PARCEL 4 (101,900 SF EXISTING) ?Cltiear?? v \ gold COMMERICAL (RETAIL) i 47 29 ?(o/ 55,278 SF 59392 col?polo PARCEL 7 (35.278 IF OAST ON ' . 24 Acs e_-1 PARCELS 7 AND 9) / CHMM IA f_ '?-1` PARCEL 3 MULTI-FAMILY 234 D.U. (234 MULTI-FAMILY O.U. EXIST) PARCEL 1 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL 200,000 SF (100,000 SF EXISTING) _---EXISTING I ACCESS NATURAL AREA O PARCEL 2 0E? MULTI-FAMILY ,y 156 D.U. Q; (190 MULTI-FAMILY D.U. EXIST) Q QPARCEL 5 PARCEL 6 SF OFFICE EX ISTING) (t00.000 SF OFFICE PLANNED) ?lEE 220,56 SF LAND USE EXISTING PLANNED TOTAL RETAIL/ COMMERICAL 81,120 SF 0 81,120 SF OFFICE 304,639 SF 100,000 S 404,639 SF LT. INDUSTRIAL 100,000 SF 100,000 SF 200,000 SF MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 390 DU 0 DU 390 DU TOTAL 485,759 SF 200,000 SF 685,759 SF 390 DU 0 DU 390 DU 0 ¢ 0 0 = NOTE S: 1. THE PROPOSED AMOUNT OF SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR INDIVIDUAL UNDEVELOPED PARCELS ARE BASED ON BEST AVAILABLE MARKET INFORMATION AND ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE. FUTURE THE AMOUNT OF TOTAL DEVELOPMENT, HOWEVER WILL NOT EXCEED THE AMOUNT OF DEVELOPMENT APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER. ACCESS 2. THAT PORTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT THAT REMAINS TO BE DEVELOPED IS REFERRED TO AS THE 'PLANNED DEVELOPMENT'. THE BUILD-OUT DATE FOR THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND FOR THE TOTAL PROJECT IS DECEMBER 31, 2008. 3. CONVERSION RATES OF 1,000 SQUARE FEET OF LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT TO 833 SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT ARE HEREBY ESTABLISHED ON PARCEL i AS APPROVED BY ORDINANCE ,#5722-95 4. ANY MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WALL BE LIMITED TO PARCELS 2. 3, 6 AND B. COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL PARCEL 10 PARCEL 11 5. PARCEL 6 IS PLANNED FOR 100,000 SF OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT. CONVERSION RATES OF 1,000 SF OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT TO.2.40 MULTI-FAMILY UNITS WITH A MAXIMUM OF 240 (11,]03 SF EXISTING) (1 ?,s39 SF EXIS11NC) UNITS, OR 1,000 SF OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT TO 2.44 HOTEL ROOMS WITH A MAXIMUM OF 244 UNITS ARE HEREBY ESTABLISHED FOR PARCEL 6 AS APPROVED BY ORDINANCE 6678-01. GULF-TO-BAY BOULEVARD COMMERCIAL 25,842 SF (RETAIL) (23,812 SF EXISTING) PARK PLACE DRI - MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN MAP H Gulf Coast Consultants, Inc. DATE: FIGURE: Land Development Consulting REVISED: AUGUST 22, 2003 DRAWN BY: RAW EXHIBIT E The developers have not purchased or optioned to purchase any additional lands adjacent to the DRI. 0 • EXHIBIT F PERMIT INFORMATION SEPTEMBER 1, 2003 - SEPTEMBER. 1, 2004 PERMIT # DATE ADDRESS TYPE BCP2003-09582 BCP2003-10621 BCP2003-10623 BCP2003-12480 BCP2004-05339 BCP2004-05367 BCP2004-05388 BCP2004-06202 BCP2004-05802 BCP2004-07021 BCP2004-07022 BCP2004-07185 BCP2004-07188 BCP2004-11200 UNS2004-00090 October 2003 October 2003 November 2003 December 2003 380 Park Place Blvd. 2710 Gulf to Bay Blvd. 2710 Gulf to Bay Blvd. 2710 Gulf to Bay Blvd. Tree Removal Plumbing Parking Lot Resurfacing Mechanical May 2004 May 2004 May 2004 June 2004 July 2004 July 2004 July 2004 July 2004 July 2004 July 2004 August 2004 2710 Gulf to Bay Blvd. 2710 Gulf to Bay Blvd. 2710 Gulf to Bay Blvd. 21 Park Place Blvd. 380 Park Place Blvd. #190 380 Park Place Blvd. #190 380 Park Place Blvd. #180 380 Park Place Blvd. # 190 380 Park Place Blvd. #180 21 Park Place Blvd. 2660 Gulf to Bay BCP2004-05578 August 2004 21 Park Place Blvd. BCP2004-08573 August 2004 380 Park Place Blvd. #190 BCP2004-09105 August 2004 380 Park Place Blvd. #180 BCP2004-09115 August 2004 311 Park Place Blvd. #600 Electrical Plumbing Repair Fire Damage Mechanical Interior Remodel Fire Alarm Fire Alarm Fire Sprinkler Fire Sprinkler Temporary Generator Unsafe Building Inspection Fire Electrical Electrical Fire Alarm ' EXHIBIT G COMPLIANCE WITH DEVELOPMENT ORDER CONDITIONS ' AND ADA COMMITTMENTS All conditions of approval and Developers commitments, as contained in the Park Place DRI Development Order (amended January 15, 2004) and the ADA are still in effect and being met. A statement of compliance is included: ' SECTION 4 A Preliminary and Final Site Plans Submitted for each Phase and Consistent with the ' "Conceptual Plan." ' All development activity must receive the appropriate city approval consistent with the Master Development Plan (Map H). All development levels comply. ' AA Prior to issuance of any permit utilizing the conversion factors, DCA and TBRPC will be notified. ' Developer has complied. Conversion factors have not been utilized to date. ' B All development shall be consistent with applicable land development codes. ' All development has been reviewed by City of Clearwater staff for compliance with codes. 1 BB. 1. Portion of Park Place Blvd. dedicated to City of Clearwater. Developer has complied. All of Park Place Blvd. is City right-of-way. ' BB 2. Portion of Park Place Blvd. constructed prior to Certificate of Occupancy for Parcels 4 or 6, no later than 12/31/98. Final segment of Park Place Blvd. was constructed, and accepted by City of Clearwater. 1 • C. Maximum floor area of 1,145,520 s.f. (795,520 office, 150,000 s.f retail, 200,000 s.f. light industrial) subject to conversion factors. Current floor area does not exceed allowable amounts. Developer has reduced the planned amounts father. CC. Mass transit requirements. Developer has constructed bus shelters on Park Place Blvd. Developer will continue to comply. D. Acquire land for ingress/egress west of the project. Access to the west was previously acquired and still exists. E. Funding commitments for transportation improvements prior to first Final Site. Plan approval after 1/19/95. All developer transportation funding commitments have been met. EE. Prior to issuance of any permit for Parcel 4, owner of Parcel 4 shall grant City a 10 foot easement for pedestrian ingress/egress. Developer has complied. FF. Parcel 4 is entitled to curb cuts on Park Place Blvd. for access purposes. Curb cut and left turn lane constructed with Park Place Blvd. construction. G. Funding commitments for transportation improvements. The developer has paid it's proportionate share and mitigated it's impacts. H. Requiring certain City cooperation. No action during the reporting year. L Deleted via Ordinance # 5142-91 J. Responsibility for all construction and improvements made on-site and maintenance thereof. Individual owners have continued to maintain respective their properties and any construction projects and are being monitored by City inspectors. K. Designated aquatic lands shall remain undisturbed, excepting as approved for use consistent with the City retention policies. No development activity has occurred affecting the aquatic lands. L. Measures to control water quality and erosion. Individual property owners have continued to maintain water quality and erosion. Any construction is monitored by City inspectors. M. Monitoring of on-site water quality in the project drainage system. The issued SWFWMD permit contains water quality monitoring provisions where appropriate. Individual contractors are held responsible for compliance with conditions. N. Paved surfaces cleaned periodically as part of water quality maintenance. Paved surfaces are cleaned as needed by individual owners. 0. Drainage plans required at time of Final Site Plan approval. • All previously approved development complied with the City drainage requirements. Any future development will comply with Final Site Plan submittal requirements (including drainage plans). P. Final Drainage Plans to meet FGFWFC recommendations. All previously approved development has complied Future development will also comply. Q. Bicycle and pedestrian paths required. Sidewalks have been constructed on Park Place Blvd. R. _ Soil limitations corrected and mitigated, additional soils testing as required. All previously approved development activity complies with the stated requirement as a condition of plan approval by the City. S. Construction phased to keep any trees with active osprey nests in place through nesting season. Osprey nest has been successfully relocated. T. Capture-release program established and approved by FGFWFC for certain wildlife species. Developer has complied. A capture-release project approved by FGFWFC was completed December 6, 1991. - - U. Any historic or archeological resources discovered to be reported to appropriate state agency. All previously approved development complied. All future development will comply. • • V. Site Plans must include provisions for preservation and transplanting of tree clusters and individual trees where possible. All previously approved development complied. All future development will comply and undergo review by City arborist prior to approval. W. Encouragement of. energy conservation measures. All previously approved development complied. All future development will comply as a condition of approval by the City. X. Maintenance of on-site wells. Well on Parcel # 2 required rerouting to provide fresh water. SWFWMD permit was issued and well repaired in prior reporting year. Y. NOT APPLICABLE (City requirement) Z. Contribution of proportionate share of construction costs for certain traffic improvements. The developer has paid its proportionate share and fully mitigated it's transportation impacts. DREW ST .. PARCEL I rn = PARCEL 3 u? - - - - - - - - - - - - - PARCEL 2 PARCEL 8 e PARCEL 4 ? PARCEL 7 PARCELS PARCEL5 a A CEL 10 P RC 11 GULF TO BAY BLVD Parcel Conl<guraion Map Owners: I Park Place Land, Ltd and Bausch and Lomb Case: DR12003-09001 Site: 300 South Park Place Boulevard Property Size (Acres): 99.13 17/29/16/66373/000/0050 17/29116/66373/000/0040 17/29/16/66373/000/0030 17/29/16/66373/000/0020 17/29/16/66373/000/0010 Notice of Proposed Change to extend 17/29/16/59392/001/0010 the buildout date of the Development PIN: 17/29n 6/0oooo/z3o/,100 17/29/16/00000/230/0100 Request: of Regional Impact (DR[) by five years 17/29/16/000001230/0130 17/29/16/00000/240/0060 to December 3 1 LOOU 17/29/16/00000/240/0400 , . 17129/16/85546/000/0020 17/29/16/85546/000/0030 17/29/16/85546/000/0010 Aflas Page: 291 A CDB Meeting Date: November 19, 2003 Case No.: DRI2003-09001 Agenda Item: E2 CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT BACKGROUND INFORMATION: ORIGINAL OWNER/APPLICANT: Park Place Land, Ltd. and Bausch and. Lomb Incorporated REPRESENTATIVE: Tim Johnson, Esquire LOCATION: Generally located between Gulf to Bay Boulevard and Drew Street from Hampton Road to the U.S. 19 Frontage Road REQUEST: To amend the approved Park Place Development of Regional Impact (DRI) Development Order through the Notification of Proposed Change process to extend the build out date of the DRI by five years to December 31, 2008. SITE INFORMATION: DRI SIZE: 4,318,810 square feet or 99.13-acres DIMENSIONS OF DRI: 2,500 feet by 2,500 feet m.o.l. DRI PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Office, Residential, Restaurant, Retail and Light Industrial Proposed Use: Same PLAN CATEGORY: Current Category: Industrial Limited (IL); Residential/Office/Retail (R/O/R); Residential/Office General (R/OG); Commercial General (CG); and Preservation (P) Proposed Category: Same ZONING DISTRICT: Current District: IRT, Industrial Research and Technology; O, Office; C, Commercial; and P, Preservation Proposed District: Same Staff Report - Community Development Board - November 19, 2003 - Case DRI2003-09001 - Page 1 EXISTING SURROUNDING USES: North: Multifamily Residential, Assisted Living Facility and Open Space South: Commercial East: Mobile Home Park, Single Family Residential West: Commercial DRI HISTORY: The DRI's development order was adopted by the Clearwater City Commission on September 1, 1983. An amendment was adopted by the City Commission on October 20, 1983 to incorporate Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council recommendations. An amendment was adopted by the City Commission on December 19, 1991 to provide 200,000 square feet for Industrial use and reduce Office use by 300,000 square feet; provide an F.A.R. for Industrial use; amending conditions based on phasing; amending the developer's payment schedule; and extending the build out date by five years. An amendment was adopted by the City Commission on January 19, 1995 to modify phasing; decreasing office development by 7,480 square feet; extending the build out date by four years; adding a conversion factor for Office use to Multifamily Residential and adding a conversion factor for Industrial use to Office or Multifamily Residential; and modifying conditions to reflect changes in the transportation network. An amendment was adopted by the City Commission on November 21, 1996 adding a land use conversion factor to Parcel 4 for office and/or hotel development and reflecting a change in ownership. An amendment was adopted by the City Commission on February 1, 2001 reducing the approved office and retail square footage for Parcel 6; adding a land use conversion factor for Parcel 6 for the conversion of approved office development to multi-family and/or hotel development; and extending the build out date by three years to December 31, 2003. ANALYSIS This Development of Regional Impact (DRI) amendment is requested by the property owner to extend the build out date of the DRI by five (5) years from December 31, 2003 to December 31, Staff Report - Community Development Board - November 19, 2003 - Case DR12003-09001 - Page 2 2008. The Park Place DRI is built out with the exception of 100,000 square feet of light industrial use on Parcel 1 and 100,000 square feet of office space on Parcel 6. The developers of the DRI have fulfilled the development order as amended to this date. 1. CONSISTENCY WITH CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN [Sections 4-602.F.1 & 4-603.F.1 ] The City's Comprehensive Plan objectives and policies applicable to the proposed DRI amendment are as follows: 2.2 Objective - The City of Clearwater shall continue to support innovative planned development and mixed land use development techniques in order to promote infill development that is consistent and compatible with the surrounding environment. 2.2.1 Policy -- On a continuing basis, the Community Development Code and the site plan approval process shall be utilized in promoting infill development and/or planned developments that are compatible. 3.2.2 Policy - Commercial land uses shall be located at the intersection of arterial or collector streets and should be sited in such a way as to minimize the intrusion of off-site impacts into residential neighborhoods. New plats and site plans shall discourage the creation of "strip commercial" zones by insuring that adequate lot depths are maintained and by zoning for commercial development at major intersections. 5.1.1 Policy - No new development or redevelopment will be permitted which causes the level of City services (traffic circulation, recreation and open space, water, sewage treatment, garbage collection and drainage) to fall below minimum acceptable levels. However, development orders may be phased or otherwise modified consistent with provisions of the concurrency management system to allow services to be upgraded concurrently with the impacts of development. 5.5 Objective - All County and State roadways in Clearwater, except those identified as backlogged or constrained by the Pinellas County MPO, shall operate at level C average daily/D peak hour. Based on the traffic analysis submitted by the applicant, as well as subsequent data that addressed specific concerns of Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) and Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council staff, the City of Clearwater Traffic Engineering Department has concluded that the proposed amendment will not decrease the transportation level of service and will not have a negative impact on the operation of the signalized intersections in the area. The proposed amendment is consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. II. CONSISTENCY WITH COUNTYWIDE PLAN The Future Land Use Map is not being amended, thus, there are no applicable regulations from the Countywide Plan. Staff Report - Community Development Board - November 19, 2003 - Case DR12003-09001 - Page 3 III. CONSISTENCY WITH THE REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL Pursuant to Subsection 380.06(19)(c), Florida Statutes, this proposed change is presumed to create a substantial deviation. A substantial deviation is defined as "any proposed change to a previously approved development which creates a reasonable likelihood of additional regional impact, or any type of regional impact created by the change not previously reviewed by the regional planning agency." Upon review of the submitted Notice of Proposed Change, TBRPC and FDOT staff determined that further analysis was needed to address specific concerns related to the submitted traffic analysis (Exhibit B) and discrepancies within the Substantial Deviation Determination Chart (Exhibit D). Both agencies are still reviewing the subsequent data and comments on the revised submittal will be provided by the reviewing agencies by November 18, 2003. The Planning Department will report the reviewing agencies' comments and recommendations at the November 18, 2003 Community Development Board meeting and the December 4, 2003 City Commission meeting. IV. CONSISTENCY WITH THE STATE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The State's Comprehensive Plan policies applicable to the proposed DRI amendment are as follows: (16)(b)3. Enhance the livability and character of urban areas through the encouragement of an attractive and functional mix of living, working, shopping, and recreational activities. (I8)(b)1. Provide incentives for developing land in a way that maximizes the uses of existing public facilities. (25)(b)5. Ensure that the transportation system provides maximum access to jobs and markets. The proposed DRI amendment is consistent with all applicable State Comprehensive Plan policies. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the analysis above, the Planning Department finds the application consistent with the Community Development Code and, contingent upon approval by the Department of Community Affairs, the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council and the Florida Department of Transportation recommends approval of the Notice of Proposed Change. Staff Report - Community Development Board - November 19, 2003 - Case DRI2003-09001 - Page 4 t . , I A 0 0 Prepared by Planning Department Staff. Attachments: Applicant's Submittal to DCA DCA Letter FDOT Letter TBRPC Letter Applicant's Responses Location Map Future Land Use Map Marc A. Mariano, Planner Zoning Map Park Place DRI Parcel Configuration S: tPlmining DepartmentlC D BIDev. Reg. ImpactIDR12003-09001 Park Place DR1300 S. Park Place BlvdIDR12003-09001 Park Place DRI staff'report.doc Staff Report - Community Development Board - November 19, 2003 - Case DR12003-09001 - Page 5 Tampa Bay Regional Planning Councll Chair Vice-Chair Secretary/Treasurer Executive Director Commissioner Barbara Sheen Todd Commissioner Steve Simon Commissioner Jane von Hahmann Manny L. Pumariega November 26, 2003 A Mr. Maura R. Minges Bausch & Lomb, Inc. One Bausch & Lomb Place Rochester, NY 14604 utc u z 2003 Subject: DRI #92 - Park Place, Notice of Proposed Change, City of Clearwater Dear Mr. Minges: The above-referenced item will be considered at the December 8, 2003 meeting of the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council which will be held at the Council offices at 10:00 a.m. A copy of the report and an agenda are enclosed for your information should you or your representative wish to attend. If you have any questions, please call me at (727) 570-5151, Ext. 255. Sincerely, eyer John =rdinat( JMM/bj Enclosures cc: Mr. Nick Shackelton Timothy A. Johnson, Jr., Esq. Mr. Robert C. Pergolizzi, AICP _ Ms. Gina Clayton Mr. George L. Deakin, P.E. Ms. Marina Pennington 9455 Koger Boulevard, Suite 219, St. Petersburg, FL 33702-2491 Phone (727) 570-5151 FAX(727)570-5118 State Number 513-5066 www. tbrpc. org Consent Agenda 12/08/03 Agenda Item #3.E.1. A A NOtc Tampa BavXegional nanniny Council Notice-of Proposed Change Report 9455 Koger Blvd., Suite 219, St. Petersburg, FL 33702 Phone (727) 570-5151 Suncom 513-5066 FAX (727) 570-5118 www.tbrpc.org DRI #92 - PARK PLACE CITY OF CLEARWATER On September 11, 2003, the applicant submitted a Notice of Proposed Change application. Supplemental information was provided on October 20, 2003. The fdllowing4consfitutes summary and history of the project, a description of the proposed chaknge's-and -they Council recommendation. Utz; U 2 2003 PR40JEC_T_D_1ES_CRIPTI0N 3 P On September 1, 1983, the City of Clearwater granted a Development Order (Ordinance No. 3205-` 83) to Metro Development Corporation for a 99.1-acre commercial and office development located at the northeast corner of the S.R. 60/U.S. 19 intersection. The project was originally approved to contain 1,500,000 square feet (sq. ft.) of office space and 460,000 sq. ft. of retail space. The Development Order has subsequently been amended four times, with the latest occurring on February 1, 2001 (Ordinance No. 6678-01). The amendments have cumulatively: modified the development parameters; authorized multi-family and hotel as approved uses; consolidated the entire project into a single phase; established and modified a land use equivalency matrix for various parcels; and extended the project buildout date by 18 years (to December 31, 2003) based on the phasing consolidation. The Development Order expires on December 31, 2003. The project is currently approved for the following development entitlements: PROJECT BUILDOUT OFFICE (Sq. Ft.) INDUSTRIAL (Sq. Ft.) RETAIL (Sq. Ft.) RESIDENTIAL (M.F. Units) December 31, 2003 404,639 200,000 81,120 390 MOTO-SED 0JA -G-E The applicant has requested additional five year extensions for the project buildout date and the Development Order expiration date, each to December 31, 2008. CON?ISTFL?LCY WITH SiLB??C?I0 8(L.96 ,_FLDRIDA STATILTES The proposal is presumed to create a Substantial Deviation as defined by Subsection 380.06(19)(c), F.S., which reads as follows: `An extension of the date of buildout of a development, or any phase thereof, by 7 or more years shall be presumed to create a substantial deviation subject to further 0 0 development-of-regional-impact review... Any extension of the buildout date of a project or a phase thereof shall automatically extend the commencement date of the project, the termination date of the development order, the expiration date of the development of regional impact, and the phases thereof by a like period of time. " WS-C_US-SiON Through the submittal of revised transportation analyses, the applicant has demonstrated that no additional mitigation will be necessary to offset the further extension of project buildout. All of the links in which the project assigns "significant" traffic will operate at acceptable levels of service. RE_COMMENDED-A-CTION Indicate to the City of Clearwater and the Florida Department of Community Affairs that the proposal is presumed to be a Substantial Deviation as defined above. However, it is the opinion of this agency that the applicant has provided sufficient information to rebut the presumption of a Substantial Deviation. No unmitigated regional impacts would be anticipated as a result of this modification. Council Agenda - www.tbrpc.org Tampa Sav egionalPlanningCouncil 9455 Koger Blvd., Suite 219, St. Petersburg, FL 33702 December 8, 2003 Phone (727) 570-5151 Suncom 513-5066 FAX (727) 570-5118 9:00 a.m. Breakfast Buffet Annual Meeting 10:00 a.m. *** THIS MEETING IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC *** Call to Order Invocation and Pledge Roll Call Voting Conflict Report Recognition of Service Awards Approval of Minutes Chair Todd Reverend James Golden Recording Secretary Recording Secretary Sec/Treasurer von Hahmann A. Approve minutes from the November 10, 2003 regular meeting. (report attached) Staff contact: Lori Denman, ext. 213. Email: lori@tbrpc.org 2. Budget Committee Sec/Treasurer von Hahmann A. Approve Financial report for the period ending 10/31/03. (report attached) B. Approve amendment to check signature authorization. C. Authorization for Officers to sign documents. D. Approve the updating of the corporate bank resolution to reflect/confirm officers. Staff contact: John Jacobsen, ext. 214. Email: johnj@tbrpc.org 3. Consent Agenda Chair Todd A. Budget and Contractual- None B. Intergovernmental Coordination & Review (IC&R) Program 1. IC&R Reviews by Jurisdiction (report attached) 2. November, 2003 IC&R Database (report attached) Staff contact: John Meyer, ext. 255. Email: johnm@tbrpc.org C. DRI Development Order Reports (DOR) - None D. DRI Development Order Amendment Reports (DOAR) - None E. Notice of Proposed Change (NOPQ Reports 1. DRI # 92 - Park Place, City of Clearwater (report attached) Recommended Action: Approve staff report. Staff contact: John Meyer, ext. 255. Email: johnm@tbrpc.org F. Annual Report Summaries (ARS) 1. DRI # 74 - River Ridge, RY 2002-03, Pasco County (report attached) 2. DRI #118 - Downtown Cruise Ship Terminal, RY 2001-02, City of Tampa (report attached) -1- 3. DRI #140 - T@a Triangle, RY 2002-03, Hillsborougipounty (report attached) 4. DRI #149 - Vandenberg Airport, RY 2002-03, Hillsborough County (report attached) 5. DRI #174 - Bay Vista Office Park, RY 2002-03, Pinellas County (report attached) 6. DRI #194 - DG Farms, RY 2002-03, Hillsborough County (report attached) 7. DRI #210 - New River, RY 2002-03, Pasco County (report attached) 8. DRI #233 - Connerton, RY 2002-03, Pasco County (report attached) Recommended Action: Approve staff reports. Staff contact: John Meyer, ext. 255. Email: johnm@tbrpc.org G. DRI Status Report Information Only. (report attached) Staff contact: John Meyer, ext. 255. Email: johnm@tbrpc.org H. Local Government Comprehensive Plan Amendments Reviewed 1. DCA # 04-1, City of Dunedin (report attached) 2. DCA # 03-2, City of Dunedin (report attached) 3. DCA # 04-1, City of Zephyrhills (report attached) Recommended Action: Approve staff reports Staff contact: Gerald Smelt, ext. 288. Email: gerry@tbrpc.org 4. Item(s) Removed from Consent Agenda, Addendum Item(s) or Any Other Item Requiring Council Discussion Council members should notify Chairman of any items they wish to be pulled from the Consent Agenda. These items will be discussed and voted on separately after the remainder of the consent agenda is approved. Review Item(s) for Discussion DRI FINAL REPORT: DRI # 252 - Cypress Creek Town Center, Pasco County The developer is seeking specific approval of a two-phase, multi-use project located on 510+ acres in southern Pasco County. Specific approval of Phase 2 will be contingent upon submittal. of additional transportation and air quality analysis pursuant to Section 380.06, F.S. The project is generally bound on the east by I-75 .and is nearly bisected by S.R. 56. The two phases would combine for 2.211 million sq. ft. of commercial uses, 420,000 sq. ft. of office space, 700 hotel rooms and 630 multi-family residential units with the potential for a multi-screen movie theatre. The Report includes a recommendation for denial of the project until additional information is provided and issues are addressed and resolved. The specific concerns for the project are outlined in the Council's Final Report. Additional Material: Final Report for DRI #252 (report attached) Action Recommended: Adoption of Final Report and transmittal to Pasco County and the Florida Department of Community Affairs. Staff contact: John Meyer, ext. ext. 255. Email: johnm@tbrpc.org 6. Annual Report Mr. Avera Wynne, Planning Director, will provide a presentation summarizing the Council's activities for the year 2003. Annual Report will be distributed at the meeting. 7. Council Members' Comments Chair Todd -2- Program Reports A. Regional Domestic Task Forces (RDSTF) Exercise Program Update Florida's eleven Regional Planning Councils have been designated by the State Domestic Security Task Force leadership to provide support to the prime contractors planning and executing the seven Regional Domestic Security Task Forces (RDSTF) tabletop (TTX) and functional exercises (FE) that must be accomplished by June 30, 2004. For RDSTF Region 4, Central Florida will serve as lead RPC and Tampa Bay will provide back-up for those counties in the Tampa Bay region participating in the exercise. Funding for equipment/supplies and support will be provided through Northeast Regional Planning Council (NERPC). A brief recap of the services the RPCs are being asked to perform will be provided at the meeting. Recommended Action: Authorize Chair to sign an agreement with Central Florida Regional Planning Council (CFRPC) not to exceed an amount of $15,000; and, an agreement with NERPC not to exceed an amount of $100,000. Staff contact: Bill Lofgren, ext. 248. Email: bill@tbrpc.org B. Other The November LEPC and ABM reports are attached for your information. Additional material: Recap, LEPC Meeting, November 19, 2003. (report attached) Summary of the November 13, 2003 ABM Meeting. (report attached) 9. Executive/Budget Committee Report - No Report. 10. Other Council Reports Building Update Additional Material: Building Budget Synopsis (report attached) Building Time Line (report attached) Staff contact: Manny Pumariega, ext. 213. Email: manny@tbrpc.org 11. Chair's Report - Chair Todd 12. Executive Director's Report - Manny Pumariega 13. Outgoing Chair Report - Chair Todd 14. Installation of Officers 15. Incoming Chair Report Adjournment Next Meeting - To be announced due to office facility move. The Council, in accordance with its adopted rules ofprocedure, may only take action on matters not on the printed agenda involving the exercise of agency discretion and policy-making upon a finding by the Council of an emergency situation affecting the public's health, safety, and welfare. Council meetings are Public Meetings within the context of Section 286.011, Florida Statutes. Council meetings are not Public Hearings within the context of Section 120. 54, Florida Statutes. The Chairman has full discretion as to whether or not to recognize speakers other than Council members or staff, and is not required to recognize individuals to speak on issues before the Council. Public Hearings on issues before the Council are conducted by individual local governments, and are the proper forum for public comment. Please note that if a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Council with respect to any matter considered at the above cited meeting or hearing, s/he will need a record of the proceedings, and for such purpose, s/he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record -3- includes the testimony and evidence upon 9,01ch the appeal is to be based. Persons wishing to speak at rTCauncil meeting are required to complete the form provided at the entrance to the meeting room. The form, after being completed, must be given to the Recording Secretary. Ifyou area person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this meeting you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council at 727-570-5151 within 3 working days of the meeting. -4- Tampa Say,7Zegional Planning Council Chair Vice-Chair Secretary/Treasurer Executive Director Commissioner Barbara Sheen Todd Commissioner Steve Simon Commissioner Jane von Hahmann Manny L. Pumariega July 8, 2003 Florida Design Consultants, Inc. c/o Mr. Robert Pergolizzi Gulf Coast Consulting 9737 13501 St. N. Seminole, FL 33776 P Go?? U Subject: DRI #92 - Park Place, Transportation Methodology Statement, City of Clearwater Dear Mr. Pergolizzi, The staff of the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council has reviewed the (proposed) Revised Transportation Methodology Statement (dated June 26, 2003). We request the following modification to the document: The applicant states in the June 26, 2003 revised Traffic Methodology, on page 2, Section II (Existing Conditions), seventh line from the top, that "It was confirmed that K100 volumes would be derived from actual turning movement counts using FDOT peak season factors." However, in the original June 11, 2003 Traffic Methodology, page 2, third line from the start of Section II (Existing Conditions), it is stated that in regard to the use of K100 that "All traffic counts will be converted to peak hour/peak season (K100) equivalents using the appropriate FDOT weekly adjustment factor." The two statements in reference to K100 appear to be very different. The reviewer agrees with the original June 11, 2003 Traffic Methodology, but not the June 26, revised Traffic Methodology in regard to the K100. Please use the K100 as discussed in the original June 11, 2003 Traffic Methodology. Assuming that the applicant will accept this requested modification, no further revised Methodology Statement will be required by our agency. If you should have any question(s) regarding this request, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. George Deakin directly at 813/620-1460. Thank you. 9455 Koger Boulevard, Suite 219, St. Petersburg, FL 33702-2491 Phone (727) 570-5151 FAX(727)570-5118 State Number 513-5066 www.tbrpc.org • Sincerely, armeyer- DRI Coordinator cc: Mr. Ed Armstrong, Johnson Blakely Ms. Gina Clayton, City of Clearwater Mr. Kent Fast, FDOT • Mr. Ramon Solis, Pinellas County Mr. Marina Pennington, FDCA Mr. George Deakin, Kimley-Horn R?1 • FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS 8 PLANNERS June 26, 2003 Mr. John Meyer, DRI Coordinator Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council 9455 Koger Boulevard, Suite 219 St. Petersburg, Florida 33702 Re: Park Place DRI NOPC Traffic Analysis Confirmation of Traffic Methodology Dear Mr. Meyer: r1 As a follow-up to the June 24, 2003 Transportation Methodology meeting, I am documenting adjustments made to the proposed methodology. For ease of reference I will follow the format of the Transportation Methodology Report. 1. INTRODUCTION All participants understood the applicant was seeking a build-out extension to 2008 and would not be changing the overall project size or composition. The analysis will include comparisons to the original ADA and Development Order (Ordinance #3287-83). For clarification purposes the project was originally approved for: 150,00 S.F. Retail Commercial 1,103,000 S.F. Office Through several NOPC and implementation of trade-off mechanisms the following development presently exists:' 81,120 S.F. Retail Commercial 304,639 S.F. Office 100,000 S.F. Light Industrial 390 D.U. Apartments After completion of the NOPC process the proposed full development to be analyzed in this report are: 81,120 S.F. Retail Commercial 404,639 S.F. Office 200,000 S.F. Light Industrial 390 D.U. Apartments Only 100,000 S.F. of light industrial space and 100,000 S.F. of office space remains. The comparisons listed in Section I of the Transportation Methodology Report were agreed to be appropriate. The consultant will list the improvements contained in the Development Order (Ordinance 5722-95) to demonstrate they have been completed and/or proportionate share was paid. 2639 McCORMICK DRIVE • CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33759 Tel: (727) 724-8422 • Fax: (727) 724-8606 Mr. Joan Meyer • • June 26, 2003 Page 2 II. EXISTING CONDITIONS The methods for establishing existing conditions were agreed to be acceptable. It was clarified that HCS would be used and that traffic entering/exiting Clearwater Mall would be low due to construction. It was agreed that traffic projections from a prior study of the Clearwater Mall Redevelopment would be used to estimate future mall traffic. The consultant will use FDOT truck factors for State Roads, Pinellas County and the City of Clearwater will provide truck factors for their roads that are near the project ie: Drew Street, McMullen-Booth Road, Sunset Point Road. It was confirmed that K-100 volumes would be derived from actual turning movement counts using FDOT peak season factors. All roadway link analysis will be on a directional basis. The source of signal timings must be included in the report. Pinellas County and the City of Clearwater will provide signal timings to the consultant. III. PLANNED AND PROGRAMMED IMPROVEMENTS The list of programmed improvements was verified by the review agencies. It was noted the four-lane widening of Drew Street begins at Duncan Avenue rather than Highland Avenue. It was also noted improvements to the SR 60/Clearwater Mall access points were being completed as part of the malls FDOT permit and would be completed by December 2003. IV. BACKGROUND GROWTH The screenline growth rates included in the Transportation Methodology Report were found acceptable and indicate the "built-out" nature of mid-Pinellas County. V. FUTURE CONDITIONS A. TRIP GENERATION The methods of establishing trip generation for the originally approved plan, and the proposed development plan were acceptable. The 15% internal capture and 2.5% transit capture were found acceptable. It was clarified an internal bus stop exists on Park Place Boulevard and bus stops exist on Hampton Road and at the Drew/Hampton intersection. Retail pass-by capture will be based on ITE Trip Generation Handbook, and will not exceed 10% of traffic on Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard. B. TRIP DISTRIBUTION The proposed trip distribution in the Transportation Methodology Report was acceptable. It was agreed by the consultant that traffic would not be distributed to the Sky Harbor/Seville Boulevard loop around Clearwater Mall since this is no longer a viable connection. C. STUDY AREA DELINEATION The review agencies agreed the project study area will include any roadway segments where full project PM peak hour external primary trips comprise 4.5% or more of the LOS D peak hour/directional "capacity". It was clarified that LOS D is the adopted LOS ?? + r V Mr. John Meyer • • June 26, 2003 Page 3 standard. Signalized intersections where project traffic consumes 4.5% of the intersection capacity will also be analyzed. D. CAPACITY ANALYSIS The review agencies agreed that to avoid double counting project traffic, estimates of existing PM peak hour external primary trips will be done using ITE Trip Generation, 61h Edition. This existing project traffic will be subtracted from the total project traffic to arrive at unbuilt additional project traffic. Additional project traffic from unbuilt portions of the Park Place DRI will be added to accumulated background traffic to identify the total 2008 traffic volumes. It was agreed that the total 2008 traffic will be compared to the original ADA build-out (1991) traffic projections. Roadway segments where impact is greater than that previously analyzed will be analyzed in detail on a directional basis to determine expected levels of service in 2008. It was agreed that any necessary roadway improvements would be compared to those in. the Development Order and any new improvements above and beyond those already listed in the Development Order would be added. VI. CONCLUSION The applicants consultant stated a report would be submitted by late August. Appendices will be numbered and include a table of contents. A new Master Development Pan (Map H) will be prepared and submitted with the NPOC application and traffic analysis. If you agree this letter represents the discussion and agreements made at the June 24, 2003 meeting, please sign below and return to me. Sincerely, Robert Pergolizzi, AICP Vice President/Transportation and Planning Print Name: Date: :az LAmeyer-2.doc Encl. Cc: Gina Clayton, City of Clearwater Ramon Solis, Pinellas County MPO Kent Fast, FDOT RECEIVED Marina Pennington, DCA JUN 3 0 2003 George Deakin, Kimley-Horn Mike Siebel, PSTA NNING DEPARTMENT Nicholas Shackleton, HTG Commercial Group, IFc? Ed Armstrong, Johnson, Pope, et.al. CITY OF CLEARWATER Maura Minges, Bausch & Lomb File 295-01.501 • P LORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. GINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS & PLANNERS June 11, 2003 Mr. John Meyer, DRI Coordinator Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council 9455 Koger Boulevard, Suite 219 St. Petersburg, FL 33702 Re: 'Park Place DRI - NOPC (DRI #92) Dear John: DECEIVED JUN 18 2003 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Enclosed are two (2) copies of the Transportation Methodology Report for the Park Place DRI-NOPC. We look forward to the methodology meeting at your office on June 24, 2003 (1:30 PM). If you have any questions, please call me at (727) 724-8422. - Sincerely, Robert C. Pergolizzi, AICP Vice President/ Transportation and Planning :cp Encl. L:\neyer-l .doc cc: Gina Clayton,1City of Clearwater, w/ Encl. Kent Fast, FDOT, w/Encl. Marina Pennington, DCA, w/Encl. Ramon Solis, Pinellas County, w/Encl. George Deakin, Kimley-Horn, w/Encl. Mike Siebel, PSTA, w/Encl. Ed Armstrong, Johnson, Pope, et. al., w/Encl. Nicholas Shackleton, HTG Commercial Group, Inc., w/Encl. Maura Minges, Bausch & Lomb, w/Encl. File 295-01 2639 McCORMICK DRIVE • CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33759 Tel: (727) 724-8422 • Fax: (727) 724-8606 ti • • TRANSPORTATION METHODOLOGY REPORT FOR PARK PLACE DRI/NOPC 1. INTRODUCTION The Park Place DRI is located in the City of Clearwater north of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard and east of U.S. 19. Park Place (DRI #92) was originally approved in 1983 to contain the following uses with an expected buildout date of 1991: Retail Commercial 150,000 s.f. Office 1,103,000 s.f. Several NOPC analyses have modified the Development Order including modifications of land uses, extension of buildout and establishment of land use trade-off mechanisms. These modifications have extended the buildout to December 31, 2003 and approved the following uses: Retail Commercial 81,120 s.f.* Office 404,639 s.f.* Light Industrial 200,000 s.f. Multi-Family 390 d.u. *Trade-off mechanisms permitted multi-family development on Parcels 2, 3, 6 and 8 and office/hotel on Parcel 6. The Park Place DRI is almost fully built-out and most actual construction has been at densities well below approved levels. The developer has fully paid its proportionate share and fulfilled its Development Order obligations. Through several NOPC and implementation of trade-off mechanisms the following development presently exists: Retail Commercial 81,120 s.f. Office 304,639 s.f. Light Industrial 100,000 s.f. Apartments 390 d.u. The applicant wishes to extend the buildout date to December 31, 2008 for developing the remaining parcels under the currently approved Master Plan. A detailed traffic analysis will be prepared to evaluate whether this proposed change results in additional impacts. Specifically three (3) items will be evaluated. 1. Whether the proposed change results in a 15% increase in PM peak hour external trips generated by the project. The analysis will include comparisons to the original ADA and Development Order (Ordinance #3287-83). • Transportation Methodology Report Park Place DRI/NOPC Page 2 2. Whether the projected PM peak hour traffic volume in the revised buildout year (2008) are greater than those predicted in the original buildout year (1991). 3. Whether any projected increase results in unacceptable levels of service and necessary improvements above and beyond those included in the Development Order. II. EXISTING CONDITIONS Existing conditions will be established by conducting PM peak hour intersection turning movement counts at several signalized intersections in the vicinity of the project. These will be supplemented by obtaining multi-day traffic counts on adjacent roadway segments for governmental agencies. All traffic counts will be converted to peak hour/peak season (K-100) equivalents using the appropriate FDOT weekly adjustment factor. Existing conditions will be analyzed using 2002 QLOS Handbook procedures to include roadway specific traffic and signalization characteristics. Intersections will be analyzed using the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) procedures as replicated by the HCS software. A 2% truck factor will be used in all HCS analysis. III. PLANNED AND PROGRAMMED IMPROVEMENTS A list of roadway improvements programmed for construction within the first three (3) years of the MPO Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and the adopted FDOT Five-Year Work Program will be included. A preliminary list, which is subject to change is shown below: PLANNED/PROGRAMMED IMPROVEMENTS Roadway Segment "N A Improvement Construction Year Agency Drew Street - N.E. Coachman) Widen to 4LD Under CST FDOT #2570331 U.S. 19/Drew Street Interchange Under CST FDOT #2569571 U.S. 19 (S. of S.R. 590 - N. of Sunset Point) Interchanges Under CST FDOT #2568881 Keene Road (Drew - Sunset Point) Construct 4LD Under CST Pinellas Cty. #920491 SR 60/Sky Harbor Drive Intersection Improvements 2003 Clearwater Mall Developer SR 60/US 19 NB Ramp Lengthen RT Lane 2003 Clearwater Mall Developer IV. BACKGROUND GROWTH Existing traffic on the roadway network will be adjusted to reflect background traffic in the revised buildout year. This will be done using screenline annual growth rates by comparing FSUTMS model projections for 1999 and 2015 along selected screenlines. Considering the "built-out" nature of Pinellas County the growth rates are reasonable and are shown in the map attached. 1999, 2015 AGR A-A 231,624 272,135 1.01% B-B 228,076 275,417 1,02% C-C 155,942 176,309 0,77% D-D 119,767 120,045 0% SUNSET IPOINTI RD, B w A Q ? N w w Z -? W ? W U Y ? W 2 DREW ST, CLEVELAND ST, GULF TO BAY BLVD, DRUID RD, A ENTERPRISE RD I- 0 0 pa i z w D J J C B ? SR 590 - D 7 d HAINES d BAYSHORE C A NURSERY RD, BELLEAIR RD. A Q? A W W 2 Z U W J W W Y A EAST BAYIDR ROOSEVELT C Ld A DESCRIPTION, PARK PLACE DRI SCREENLINE GROWTH RATES PROJECT No. 295-01 DATE, FIGURE, FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. 5/03 ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS 8 PLANNERS DRAWN BY, 2639 McCormick Dr. Clearwater FL, 33759 Tel, (727)724-8422 - Fax: (727)724-8606 Transportation Methodology Report Park Place DRI/NOPC Page 3 V. FUTURE CONDITIONS A. Trip Generation • Trip generation estimates for the revised project will be made using ITE Trip Generation, 6th Edition. A 15% internal capture will be applied as was approved in the 1996 and 2000 NOPC analyses. As was approved in all previous NOPC traffic analyses, a 2.5% transit capture will be applied for PSTA routes. Retail pass-by capture will be based on ITE Trip Generation Handbook and will not exceed 10% of traffic on Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard. B. Trip Distribution Project traffic distribution will be based on the FSUTMS Regional Transportation Analysis model for the year 2005 and is shown in Figure 1. This distribution was approved and used in the 2000 NOPC analysis. C. Study Area Delineation The project impact study area will include all roadway segments where project traffic consumes 4.5% or more of the LOS D peak hour maximum service flow rate of the segment. The study area will also include signalized intersections where project traffic comprises 4.5% or more of intersection capacity. D. Capacity Analysis Although the study area will be based on full DRI traffic, much of the DRI traffic is already on the roadway system and will be included in the traffic counts. To avoid double counting, the amount of external traffic from existing Park Place development will be calculated using ITE Trip Generation, 6th Edition. The amount of external trips from the built portion will be deducted from existing traffic and only new (unbuilt) Park Place traffic will be added. This is the same procedure that was approved and used in the 2000NOPC traffic analysis. Due to the interconnecting of parking areas with non-DRI businesses actual driveway counts should not be used to determine existing DRI traffic. New (unbuilt) traffic will be added to accumulated background traffic to estimate total expected traffic in the revised buildout year (2008). The projected volumes in the revised buildout year will be compared to those projected for the original buildout year (1991). Roadway segments where projected 2008 volume exceeds the originally approved volume will be analyzed in detail to determine PM peak hour LOS and improvements. This analysis will be done on a peak hour directional basis in accordance -.C A ENTERPRISE RD 27 0 a a4 1% I M } W J J X E U SUNSET POINT RD, 4% 3Z MP 2% 0 ? ' SR 590 W * O S L EW ST, X -? " = e% ?S -? 9% 7% 27 LEVELAND ST, , j Cu 10% 13% " 16% 28% 22% 38% 6Y. GULF TO ; Cu Y BAY., BLVD, ~ ? DRUI D RD, 1 , a NURSERY RD, ?n f? ix BELLEAIR RD, ix f_ 'T WINES la ?_ BAYSHORE A W = Z W J W W Y Pq 1r, ix EAST BAY DR ROOSEVELT <L X Z DESCRIPTION, PARK PLACE DRI PROJECT TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PROJECT No. 295-01 DATE, FIGURE. ?j FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. 5/03 ¦? ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS 8 PLANNERS DRAWN BY, 2639 McCormick Dr. Clearwater FL, 33759 ( Tel: (727)724-8422 - Fax, (727)724-8606 0 0 Transportation Methodology Report Park Place DRI/NOPC Page 4 with FDOT 2002 QLOS Handbook practices and as done in the 2000 NOPC Traffic Analysis. Any necessary roadway improvements will be compared to those in the Development Order and any new improvements above and beyond those already listed in the Development Order will be added. A revised proportionate share calculation will be made. VI. CONCLUSION Existing conditions will be established by obtaining traffic counts in the vicinity of the project and analyzing traffic conditions using HCS and FDOT ART-PLAN software. Background traffic will be adjusted to the revised buildout year using a calculated annual growth rate based on screenlines. External trip generation will be estimated using ITE Trip Generation, 6t' Edition, with appropriate internal capture, transit capture and pass-by capture. Project traffic will be distributed to the roadway system using FSUTMS and roadway where project traffic consumes 4.5% or more of the LOS D peak hour Acapacity@ will be included in the study area. Projected 2008 traffic will be compared with originally approved traffic and roadways where the approved volume would be exceeded will be analyzed in detail. For these roads analyzed in detail the expected LOS and improvements necessary will be determined. These improvements will be compared to those in the original Development Order. A new Map H will be prepared if necessary. :es RAPARK PLACE DRI-NOPC.DOC a S Tampa Bay Xegional Planning Council • • SIGN-IN SHEET Transportation Methodology Meeting 9455 Koger Blvd., Suite 219, St. Petersburg, FL 33702 Phone(727)57075151 Suncom 513-506.6. FAX (727) 570-5118 www.tbrpc.org DRI #92 - PARK PLACE CITY OF CLEARWATER June 24, 2003 - 1:30 p.m. NAME AGE\CYTIRM PHONE E_NI1IL :ADDRESS A4iFyD2 T(3pP6 S70-s?S-l X JP?,,J "'&aAA-'.o2U 5COTT ZDC-sS f V1?F SP?? BSb??fB?- 5L4, 77- /?ls2?'@ I've Sokt C?2???oq-8 <sol?S e c-= n ?/-lb pj,4usci.. $ Lv,-t.6, /o e, 727 4, V2- 5 fj - S N 0 150 3D0 CREW STREET PARCEL 3 EXISTING ACCESS EXISTING p_ ACCESS 0 NR ? K OFFICE 6 82,179 SF PARCEL 8 (0.1ft w umx** I 0 7), 1-6 MULTI-FAMILY 234 D,U. (234 4µn-?AST D.M. (UST) PARCEL 1 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL 200,000 SF (100.000 w E,r wc) NATURAL AREA A PARCEL 2 41 0?v MULTI-FAMILY 156 D.U. OFFICE 101,900 SF PARCEL 4 (101,100 S/ EvITw0) 1 COMMERICAL (RETAIL) 55,278 SF PARCEL 7 (35.776 IF COST M / PARCELS 7 ANO 1 E/ U l PARCEL 10 (,1,303 IF c.%TF40) GULF-TO-BAY BOULEVARD <v (156 MIAs-fMt' D.V. mr) Q J (14.519 Sr PARCEL 11 CVSTU0) PARCELS PARCEL 6 a? COMMERCIAL (1n.56o i, ancE EmT.4c) (IC*.*" Sr Off-Cc PIAAFKo 220,560 F COMMERICAL 25,842 SF (R[CAIL) (25.843 S? (115TI10) z FUTURE ACCESS LAND USE EXISTING PLANNED TOTAL RETAIL/ 81,120 SF 0 81 120 SF COMMERICAL , ataa;E??1 2 ie-3,cc,? OFFICE 422460 -A8-Z,4-7-9- SF 404,639 SF LT. INDUSTRIAL 100,000 SF 100;000 SF 200,000 SF MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 390 OU 0 DU 390 DU 403,580 SF 282,179 SF 685,759 SF TOTAL 390 DU 0 DU 390 DU SDRS; 1, THE MOPOSCO AMOUNT OF SQUARE FOOTAGE TOM NDIHOUAL UNDEVELOPED PARCELS ARC BASED ON SCSI AVAILABLE MARKET INFORMATION AND MC SUBJECT f0 CHANG[. ME -DUN? OF TOTAL DEVELOPMENT, HOFCVCR FILL NOT EXCEED THE AMOUNT Or GE. APPROVED By ME DEVELOPMENT OROCR. 2. THAT POR104 Or THE DEVELOPMENT THAT REMAINS TO BE O[VELOP[D IS RCFCRRCD TO AS ME BANNED DEVELOPMENT'. ME 6UE0-OUT OAT[ FOR ME PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND FOR M[ TOTAL MOACT IS DECEMBER 31, 2007. 3. CONVERSION RATES OF 1,000 SQUARE FEET OF LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT TO 633 SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE OEVELOPMCNT ARE HEREBY ESTABLISHED ON PARCEL I AS APPROVED BY ORDINANCE 15722-15 4. ANY MULTI-FA Ly RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT "LL BE LIMITED TO PARCELS 7. 3. 6 AND 6. 5, PARCCL 61S PLMHCO FOR 100,000 Sr OF OFFICE OEVELOPMCNT, CCNVER9ON RATES OF 1,000 SF Of OFFICE OEVELOPIIENf to 2.40 MUIn-rAMILY UNITS ,FM A MAHUUM OF 740 UNITS, OR 1,000 Sr Of OFFICE DEVELOPMENT TO 2.44 HOTEL ROOMS WTH A MAMUUM Of 244 UNITS ARE HCRCBY ESTABLISHED FOR PARCEL G. fA6.?f 6. TYM6NN( Ty NFIVIYp16 1 R Al I :_-= - _FLoRnA nESrc cavsuLrwrs M. N, PARK PLACE DRI - MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN MAP H REVISED: SEPTEMBER 18, 2000 lo m v - RYA P TKRpC Fly ?a??e ti t tw0a cam a tx, .s_: ?.Oo??'- lam. -cR. UYl ? rG- -? fit b at?d_t?orA?rhC[f9ki shal_2 ?- ! (?1 /_. W-li- ?s_CVPDKUw MtRV sQ?u? ui III YJkAtc,/ Poin'U? T?'C7926 - *V? W Oct,10, 2003 4:59PM TBR# P. 2/7 ampa Say,;P-Pgional 'Rr- nning Cowl it Chair Vicc-Chair Se'CrGfslry/TrOaSLUCr Lxccutive Director Corniilissiantr Barbara Sheen Tudd Gomr-NSSioller Stow Simon (:olnmissl?n?r,l»nr.,'vprl HEd-1111a[111 Manny L. r'urnclriC.y,a October 10, 2003 D M (F,- [? U 15 OCT 1 3 2003! Mr. Matra R, Minbes Bausch and Lomb, Tnc_ DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPT One Bausch & Lomb Place CITY OF CLEARWATER Rochester. NY 14604 Subject. DM #92 - Park .Place, Notice tYProposed Chan.?;e, City of Clearwater Dear Mr. Minges: The staff of the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council has completed the review of the above- referenced NOPC Application submitted on September 11, 2003, The following serves as a background of the project, a stmrrmary of proposed mnodifications and the identification of additional information requested. BACKGROUND On September 1, 1983, the City of Clearwater granted a Development Order (Ordinance No. 3205- 83) to Metro Development Corporation for a 99-1-acre commercial and office development located at the, northeast corner of the S.R. WITS. 19 intersection.. The project was originally approved to contain 1,500,000 square feet. (sq. ft.) ofof'Rce space and 460,000 sq..ft. of retail space. The Development Order has subsequently been amended tixlr times, with the latest (1CCUrrin.g on February 1, 2001 (Ordinance No. 667801). The amendments have cumulatively: modified the development parameters; authorized multi-family and hotel as approved uses; consolidated the eature project into a single phase; established and modified a land use equivalency matrix for various parcels; and extended the project bbild(iut date by 18 years (to December 31, 2003) based on file phasing consolidation- The Development Order expires on December 31, 2003. The project is currently approved for the followimi development entitlements- .,.,:::r, ;,. ar;A?.p.°:c,.e:.,:xir:a•.ws .._e..._5 r,..r?}c:r-?....?....e.?. . ? .1, ..r..._.....,......,. r...(?,. ,_,.,....-......,r..,.,.,?.,1,r . ......................... ?.,............. ....,-:?r_,r•::......,::w,dr:' `.....,_...._....._.._r.?r .............?:-.?:.:: ,'! ? w ......... ..,.....r.. r. N ............. V,a A .?.ru: I r.....r.,.,.r..,f,.rhW,i..,r.....__.......,,+:. rrr.,.. .til+.........._.,. ,,.,?u............,;:..1„•, ... ??'yy rr ,yam .... ....,..... a, ..,........c.:?:, ..?,.,,,. ,., .:, ,X++ .. ,x_.......r.r.r.r, .1 r:::.:.::::........1.. : ...,.._,. .r.......,..... ,,,..,..Ir.Ji '?_,......_.r,.,.l.dl,?::,r.::_.::::::_:.. ........,........., ,..r.r..,......., r ........ ....,...._....,....... : r: .,,...........,,,,..,a, ..._._..._:.._.......r...,r.rr,? .x,., Nltruur::: rr„rfKl+r nn. :,x::_,.r.: ............_...........,.... ... ,....__._..k::.:,':^c-- ....._.....,. ...._._._n_ r..l., 9, . .,?. ; .1 .?,? ? .r. i (? 1 ._ ? 1... .,.._...,.._:..? r._)t1A, 1 _.--?:::ra,. rl.r_._.._r.x nI.Y _:;,ne-r-u 11 .rh.. __. __.:.. _. _ . ., .., . .. , r ,r ::?-::,a::r? ? '},? :•.._'_':_. f- , . ....... ; 7.r.,J,r},11: "r.1f :w ?{rJS: :C r:T?::?_ :: k - :S:Ih'?.1Y::Si' - ? i? = :^^?'-:? !• i .:?,I'??;??E:4y?:.::?7r1JIL?O+..I:, ,n.., ......_.... ?rr,.._.....r?..._.._.m.r1r.,,r,.,_.............;?.,. . . - ,c ..........._ r..,.,, ??.: '._......?._...?mr Ef„ ,:::•:::?r:,r .:................ .:: : :,:::r:::- ,-. r :; _ . . ;J.,-::::::::::: ... f:.,.-?,.:, ,.Ft,r?:,,.....,.... .,,............,._t? . _ . ? . . . r .:.:::.::rv,: 1. :.':: .rr ?P•i.,R.:::_:::? .. ?,l.,. , >,......_..... .. , . r _r?^ r . . • _.?rh.,z q. . _:_. .:: ...,:. ' r::.,_... . . . . December 31, 2003 404,639 200,000 81,120 390 :3457, Koger Boulevard, Suite 2 1. 1, St, Pt1,turytAurg, FL 3:3702-2491 Phone, (727) 570-5151 PAX (727) 5707:51 1,8 Starr \t?rink:rrr 513-5066 www.tbgpc.org i Oct.10 2003 4:59PM TBRo •- P. 3/7 L?z 0 C T 13 Zpp I . ' jRREI?T'p C- D SCT?LT()N L_:.? DEVELOPMENT S CITY OF CLEA13 ATE DEPT The applicant has requested an additional five year extension of the project buildout date 7 December 31, 2008). C C2Mi)Y?EN'SIRE QIUE.S_T k+ (IR-AT)I.ITILOiN-A 1NFOB lYIA]<'l ( 1 1. Additions]. information, A endiees A, B and C_ Please supply a. copy of the HCS electronic files'Used in the traffic analysis, or provide the multi-page printout .for each HCS analysis. If electronic files are submitted, please: provide an equivalency table that notes the intersection nat-ne, tlic coixesponding electronic file name, the year of the analysis, and the development scenario being analyzed.- 2. Coordinated S.i-- al Timirng, HC,S Arterial Analysis A eadices A R and C_ In the arterial analysis, if tlae traf'fi.c signals are assumed to be coordinated, then all, of the traffic signals in the analyzed arterial should have the same cycle length. Please revise the arterial analysis accordingly. 3. Year- _z0(18, HC S Arterial Anal sis A pendix C. in the year 2008 arterial a3a.alysis, .the computed "We" -f-or each segment should have a value of 1.0 or less. Please .revise the arterial analysis accordingly. Ai noted in the ITiKIjwer)) C'aPacity Ma?auccl 2000, Page 15-5, fop sidebar note, at the top of the payee,. right margin, "The We ratio (X) for a lane group cannot be greater than 1.0 to compute uniform delay." FOT ea;ample, at the bottom of Page C-17, in the eastbound direction, the We ratio for the SR 60 link of Hercules Avenue to Belcher Road is greater tlkau 1.0 (i.t is 1.170). Please revise this arterial. analysis and the other arterial analysis so that the v/c Ror each segment Kati a value of 1.0. or less. 4. V/C patios, HCS Sianalizcd Intersection Analysis Appendix C. In the year 2008 signalized intersection analysis; the computed "v/c" for each lane group must have a value of 1.0 or less. Please revise the signalized intersection analysis accordingly. If the v/c ratio is larger than 1.0, it indicates queue carryover from one period to anthem The standard HCS analysis does not consider queue carryover fi-on). one period to anotber. For example, at the bottom of Page C.-11, the westbound left has a. v/c ratio greater than 1.0 (it is 1.2.1). Please revise this signalized intersection analysis acid. the othex intersection analyses so that the v/c for any lane group has a value of 1. 0, or less. 5. Tntersection Capaeft_y Consumed h ,1{ull-Proicct, Appendix C, Pages C-1. and C-2. Please malt.e the folio\Ndng changes in the "Intersection Capacity Consumed by FO-Project' methodology, on Pages C-1 and C-2_ % Oct-10- 2003 5:OOPM TB O • P. 4/7 1 The total intersection capacity should be revised so that the capacity of the intersection is the sum of the capacity of the critical movements (the critical movem.e.nts are noted by the software), not the suns of the capacity of al.l movements. The intersection capacity needs to be adjusted from the noted level of service E capacity to level of service D capacity. The adjustme.n.t factor is 0.885. Please inultiply the intersection. capacities by 0.885 to obtain the level of service D capacity. The, HCS analysis is for the critical 15 rninute period within the PM peak hour. The software divides the input "volumes" by the P11 when calculating the "adjusted flow rate." Accordingly, please divide the "Full-Project" volumes by the PHI to derive the project volumes that are used by the Z1CS software to CaICIllate level c>F service. 6. Exhibit D: Park Place DR! Substantial Deviation Determination Chart. There appears to be many discrepancies between the NUPC application .F..xiij,bit I), and the other infonrnation in the NUPC application. For exanple, in Exhibit D, in the "Type and Land Use" column, Ibr the office category, it is suited in the Far right column titled "Previous DO Change and Date" that the latest previous approval was for "795,52Q SF (TFA." Then in footnote 1., it is noted that sonic of the office was traded for multi-farnily, so that the remaining office after the trade-off is "635,680 SF GFA." This is not consistent with the in Con.uation contained in Exhibit B (Traffic Analysis Report, ted Se tember 2003). In Exhibit B, page 2 , it is noted that, the latest approved develop i r-P f? n!7 f r """' U L5 U L5? Retail - 81,10 S1,' Office 404,639 SF OCT 13 2003 L:)' Light Industrial = 2 00,000 SF Multi-family 390 DU DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPT CITY OF CLEARWATER. Another inconsistency is that in Exhibit D, Eor the residential category, it is noted in the "Proposed Plan" column that "Proposed amendment will allow oFhce development on an additional parcel (Parcel 6) to be converted Lo multi-.family.'This proposed conversion US not discussed in Exhibit B (Traffic Analysis Report, Dated September 2003). Please revise Exhibit D, and the other NUPC application infiormation so that there is consistency fiom document to document_ 7. Although not stated in the NUPC application, it is assttzxled that the developer is seeking an. identical five-year extension of the Development Order expiration date (to December 31, 2008), If this is correct, appropriate representation to this fact should be incorporated into the application and the proposed amendatory language. 8. The proposed hTasler.Developmnt flan. identifies a last revised date of August 22, 2003. Please identify all proposed changes to the Map and the prior date of revision(s)- .1Oct-10- 2003 5:OOPM TB * . P- 5/7 Comments received froze the Florida Dep aztmcent of Transportation have been appended to this correspondcnee. No comments have been received from any of the other review entities. It is my undcrstanding that comments from the City of Clearwater and the Pinellas County MPO will be submitted to your attention under separate cover. Please address any/all. agency issues simultaneously and respond to all these parties identified below. If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact nie (ext. 255) or Mr. George Deakin directly (813/620- 1460). Thank you. Sincerely, ohn . Meyer D Coordinate I mm cc, Mr_ Nick Sha.ckelton, CTG, Jnc. _Mr. Titn Johnso.11, JPBR&B lvTJ'. Robert PeIgolizz1, GCC., Inc. Ms. Gina Clayton, City cif'Cl.eaiwatcr Mr. Ramon Solis, Pinellas County MP0 Mr_ Kent Fast, FL)OT D. 2 003 1 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPT CITY OF CLEARWATER Ms. Marina Pennington, FDCA Mr_ George Deakin, KTTA. . Oct•10 ct-09-03 ji"']; RUSH 2003 5:OOPM TA P. 7/7 03:43P FOOT t 7 Planning 813 A 6443 5127800 P.01 Florida DePartment of Tian sPortation 141 N, WK 1«r Dh,c' • Tama. I') i:ihl l Ad-VI • ['hone W31 975 ON #14100 Tlh /220 aUSC nHrtr IJ SECRETARY October 9, 2003 Mr. John Meyer D Dpj Review Coordinator TIE y LS I Tampa Bay Rek'tonal Planning Co-ancil 9455 Koger Boulevard - Suite 219 OCT 13 2003 St. Petersburg, Florida ,33702 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPT ' Re: Park Place NOPC (DRI# 92) CITY OF CLEARWATER Pinellas County, Florida Dear Mr. Meyer. We reviewed the transportation analysis for the Park Place DRI. The request is primarily to extend the project buildou E date until December 31, 2008. Approxilnatcly 100,000 square feet of light industrial land use is as yet unbuilt. Another 100,000 square feet of off ce is idcntified as "planned" on the Map H. We have some coraMents which treed to be addressed by the developer. 1) At the transportation methodology meeting we did not discuss what constitutes a Krecerxt" traffic count. However I was expecting traffic counts to be more rceent. than July 2001 for Drew Street and for SR 60. Please ask the applicant to describe current traffic conditions for these streets and explain why these 2001 counts should still be considered acceptable. Drew Street carries approxiniately 31% of project traffic and SR 60 carries 380% of project traffic from the site. 2) in the tics arterial analysis for SR 60, the cycle lengths should be the same if the signals are to be coordinated for both 2003 and 2008 time frames. Why was not an arterial analysis completed for Drew Street also? Please revisit the analysis and revise if warranted. 3) 1 do not folluw the logic of Tables 2A and 2B of the analysis. It appears that with transit and retail pass-by capture reductions, the -retail parcels will experience a very significant reduGdor i ri traffic generated at the driveways- Please verify that pass-by traffic does not exceed 10°!6 of adjacent street traffic. Also ask the applicant to explain the process used to reduce the external traf c. Perhaps one table with a column for each category of reduction would assist the review agencies in determining the act`urscy of the calculations. Oct-10. 2003 5:OOPM TB pct-09 -[]3 03 : 44P FDOT Ot 7 P l grin i ng e ,?1 P- 6/7 813 G443 5127BOO P.01 ` 4) It appear: that Table 2B is depicting project trafc that has been built already, and is thus on the roadway. Haw doe% the 100,000 square feet of offcc in Parcel 5 get counted?. Please commi=t. Thank you for this opportunity to comm-erat, Sincerely, Kent F'asx, AiCP DRI Coordinator cc: TBRPC mail out list U:\pt7341d ldstrevi\driO310? 1009A92.dor. rocr 13 ? 4J? DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPT CITY OF CLEgR?NpTER ,Oct-10. 2003 4:59PM TBRJO Tampa V aV X e? yio7zal 73atm1nq C-ofineil 6 P- 1/1 FAX Developments of Regional Impact 9455 Koger Boulevard, Suite 219, St. Petersburg, FL 33702-2491 727/570-5151 (ext. 255) / Suncom: 5135066 / Fax: 7271570-5118 email: johnm@tbrpc.org TO: Mark Mariano, City of Clearwater FROM: John Meyer SUBJECT: DRI #92 - Pe NOPC Comments DATE: October 10, 2003 TIME: 4:55 pm # of Pages: 7 Mark: Per our conversation earlier today, here is a copy of the Council's and FDOT's comments regarding the above-referenced project. Please let me know if I can be of further assistance. FAX: 562-4576 [IF OCT 13 2003 -ME DEVEC?OY N?EAR CES DEPT - A?W Florida Department of transportation 11201 N. McKinley Drive • Tampa, FL 33612-6456-• P9,-e 81,3) y7,5-6000 • 1-800-226-7220 JEB BUSH GOVERNOR ?f9? LL r y .gin .. O? 2 p 2003 November 17, 2003] i>I 1. j c" l ENS EPAR?M Mr. John Meyer t' ,?'?`? ?r.• -EA DRI Review Coordinator Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council 9455 Koger Boulevard - Suite 219 St. Petersburg, Florida 33702 Re: Park Place NOPC (DRI# 92) City of Clearwater Pinellas County, Florida Dear Mr. Meyer: JOSE ABREU SECRETARY We reviewed the applicant's responses to review agency comments. The NOPC requests a buildout date extension until December 31, 2008, in order to complete the project. The transportation analysis was conducted differently than I would have preferred, however I believe it is sufficient to show that the remaining portion of the project will not adversely impact the level of service on adjacent state roadways. The Department does not object to this extension of the buildout date until December 31, 2008. Thank you for this opportunity to comment. Sincerely, Kent Fast, AICP DRI Coordinator cc: Mr. Marc Mariano, City of Clearwater Mr. George Deakin, P.E., Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Mr. Robert Pergolizzi, AICP, Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. Mr. Timothy Johnson, Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, P.A. Ms. Marina Pennington, Florida Department of Community Affairs U:tp1730kfld ri_revi\d ri03\031117.92.doc www.dot.state.fl.us (81 RECYCLED PAPER • ?'?--Nov ,.'8"'•2003 9,66AM TBRPC ? F. iisii???i?'???;:;_.r??,: ,,,:..•,•.';i?tiw;aar:f3i?-5:::;?:::? ^Y NOPC .,.. ., u.., . _....,,.•vyne'. `...vrx.V ..... ........_..., r:rnra Notice of Proposes! Change Report - -1 9455 Koger Blvd., Suite 219, St. Petersburg, FL 33702 Phone (727) 570-5151 Sunc= 513•-5066 FAX(727)570-5118 www.tbrpc,org "l?alnl?c? Yay•?cginrur177cznnlrrg (;`ours«I DRI #'f92 - PARTS PLACE +:1t CITY OF C:LEARWATER On September 11, 2003, the applicant submitted a Noti&' pf Pic Y: 1..ngc application. Supplemental infcumatic3n was provided on October 203. Thg constitutes.;a sununary and history of the project, a description proposcc?x ?q;-ihe Cn:ubCil recon-uriendation. PROJECT DES-CRIMON Oil September i, 1983, the City of Clearwater granted a:?1'C"Velo?'?' ' er (Ordinance No, 3205- 83) to Metro Development Corporation for a 99.1-aq p ,nmer6al°i33 3r •' G evelopm.cat located .°rs It 3> _::.,.5 > tF`=•!:=. at the northeast co .aer of the S.R. 60/1 3.S. 19 iTAP,` , If he prc?je ,.:his' arigittally approved to ?ti co?,stain 1,500,000 square Feet (stl, ft.) ofoffi?c aeu??,4`q00 sq b!'rr>lail space. N, 2 St±rF ?,t` I.. ?tf{?4t }?,.. Y The Development Order has subsequen been a h "nded?.c1i s, with the latest occurring on February 1, 2001 (Ordinance No. 6,6-' 01}. Tl 'Yasncndri ilts have ciunulatively: modified the development parameters; authorizedlr ' t?-f?rlla: 'and hate approved uses; eontiolidated the entire project into a single phase; cstak:llied anc:jdified slnd rise equivalency matrix for various parcels; and cxtended the prc1^ec"btiiildout d"ale?? , I ears ) ?. to December 31, 2003 based on the ILIA, s+x;:• :::-::, r 4d r phasing cq iatian. 'lt lopmcnt't QzL, orE l7eccmbcr 31, 2001. FR Y The PrUjeC # 931rr6l appea Toy ?11C fO110Wll1L [?EVBlc?riment ei?titli'mrntc , ,. r ........s_.. ...[ ay A ......- ................ ....Y} . . ,.:......_.._.._.__.........I .. ? ....... ...a.,. {•, ,..-....___................e„,:r..v..v......ax?..r,.....rc.?...,rt, :.:-:::A:;!dV????'r,••-,..::<::?::::.:'-::.:.n,e,.J.p: K'. . ... r....,......,..... , V.. wr.r ,'ss, °,:::-::::-... •. ..:x:.r.,r......., 4 . ...?.,..: -- .... x::r:::::r..:•:::d ?• ..., r I .r I , ». ............ ... :::x::r' :::... ......... T _.. IJ'T:E?i?? ?-#? >L r..... r.{........ ......_.r..:'. .N.{,.,y.._;..; _ .... ..........•............... ._. .._...._ ......,.........,,.r.,.,.........,..y..?yrc;...,,5,n..... ... _..._......._._ ... P 'E ' :x:x::. :.:,:•:?:::c:'r.Si?F.;::F;::=:I1:iiiFl:.:?'. ,..?;,`::.+ ........ .. .. ...... ......,. :?ii: ? r%i ?lt?l?• " -.....,....e.?..re ??.. ..,.. Y F ........... • ........... 5t ? ROI C ?IILa'? .. . .. ......................... ....•.?•........... ... .. } d....a,5,5.........?.. .,. E' mil$ 1~, .. , .,i. ... ... rf .. i , .......... II, u,? .... :,(•:••::sxii::••;, u.:: T ..:_,....._R I' . :ye:: I :N? :lq' ......,.....?.: ?: a,,?,L sr Ft F ?? r f?;VII v,?1}AI Decet?tber 31, 2003 1 S 3 4" 1?Es i -1639 200 000 81 120 390 r " , , icant has regi sted additional five year extensions for the project buildout date and the ;Went Qr -j::'!xpiration date, each to December 31, 2008. SUBSEC IO-NM..{16(1.9), FLORID-&XTATUT'ES The prcfposal is presumed to create a Substantial Deviation as defined by Subsection 380.06(19)(c), F.S., which reads as follows: Mn exteat ion' of the elate Of buildbut of a. development, or any phase thereof; by 7 or more years shall he presumed to create a stibstantial deviation subject to further Nov.18, 2003 9:57AM TBRPC development-of-regional-impact review... Any extension of the buildout date. of a project or a phase thereol'shall automatically extend the commencement date of the project, the termination date ol'the development order, the expiration date of the development of regional impact, and the phases thereof by a like period of lime. " DISCUSSION hrcnIgh the submittal of revised transportation analyses, the applicant additional mitigation will be necessary to offset the further extension 0 the links in which the project assigns "sigiiif leant" tra.ffi i 11 opcr . service.It; RECOMMENDED ACTTON Indicate to the City of Clearwater and the Florida i proposal is presumed to be a. Substantial Deviation as of t4is agency that the applicant bas provided suffiell a Substantial Deviation. No unmitigated regional * modification. ::'.?suit?> P. 3 atcd that no out. All of le levels of Community Affairs that the ;. 'owever, it is the opinion ?,Debut the presumption of MOMtcd as a result of this -4 Nov.18' 2003 4:66AM TBRPC 0 ::se::.r:::....511?tn^.4a •x::.:.:.:r.°.x.:ris3i:lli'P",::r:-..:;•?;;:; ..:v r.:V!?.V %ampa Y?ry ,1Zc?ylo?n?l7'larlrlru? Council • FAX Developments of Regional Impact 9455 Koger Boulevard, Suite 219, St, Petersburg, FL 33702-2491 7271570-5151 (ext. 255) / Suncom: 513-5066 / Fax: 727/570-5118 email: johnm(gtbrpc.org TO: Mark Mariano FROM: John M. Meyer, DRI Coordinator>Q-,-, .,.,,_ SUBJECT: Draft Park Place Report DATE: November 18, 2003 TIME 8:55 am # of Pages: 3 'M[ark: Per our conversation yesterday, I am transmitting a "draft" Report to be considered for approval at our next Council meeting (December 8, 2003). Attendance at the meeting is not mandatory and since it is staff s opinion that no additional information is requested, I do not anticipate that the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda for discussion. Please contact me with any questions. FAX: 562-4865 .KVv-17-03 03:55P FOOT W 7 Planning 813 9443 5127800 P.01 fdorida Department of TransportactiiAl 11 201 N. N.cKiriry Drive • W,I,o fl nIM 9 lash . PLur.r (81)1 Yl i 6000 • I a!iU.226.7220 JEB BUSH Josc ADRELI COVKANOR 1tC'KF:'i'ARY November 17, 2003 Mr. John Meyer DRI Review Coordinator Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council 9455 Koger Boulevard • Suite 219 St. Petersburg, Florida 33702 Re' Park Place NOPC (DRI# 92) City of Clearwater Pinellas County, Florida Dear Mr. Meyer: We reviewed the applicant's responses to review agency comments. The NOPC requests a buildout date extension until December 31, 2008, in order to complete the project- The transportation analysis was conducted differently than 1 would have preferred, however I believe it is sufficient to show that the remaining portion of the project will not adversely impact the level of service on adjacent state roadways. The Department does not object to this extension of the buildout date until December 31, 2008. Thank you for this opportunity to comment. Sincerely, Kent Fast, AICP DRI Coordinator cc' Mr. Marc Mariano, City of Clearwater Mr. George Deakin, P.E., Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Mr. Robert Pergoliizi, AICP, Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. Mr. Timothy Johnson, Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, P.A. Ms. Marina Pennington, Florida Department of Community Affairs U:%pl730ki%dri-rsvildri03W3i t 47.92.400 www.dot.state.fLus ® ACCYCIEOPPPEFl a 0 • STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS "Dedicated to making Florida a better place to call home" ]EB BUSH COLLEEN CASTILLE Governor Secretary October 22, 2003 Ms. Gina Clayton City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, Florida 33758 Re: Park Place Development of Regional Impact (DRI); Notification of Proposed Change; File # ADA-883-002 Dear Ms. Clayton: RECEIVED OCT 2 7 2003 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER The Department of Community Affairs received a Notification of Proposed Change (NOPC) on the Park Place DRI from Mr. Timothy A. Johnson, Jr., authorized agent for the project on September 11, 2003. The proposed change is to extend the projects buildout date an additional five years to December 31, 2008. The buildout date for the Park Place DRI had previously been extended by 18 years to December 31, 2003. Based on the review of the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council (TBRPC) and the Florida Department of transportation (FDOT), the Department objects to the proposed changes. Please see the enclosed comments from the TBRPC and FDOT. The Department recommends that the applicant coordinate with the TBRPC, FDOT, and the City of Clearwater to address all agency concerns. If additional information is provided to adequately address the objection, the Department will reconsider its position. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Ron Horlick, Planner, at (850) 922-1801. Sincerely yours, OA Charles Gauthier, AICP Chief of Comprehensive Planning Enclosures CG/rh Cc: Manuel Pumariega, Executive Director, Tampa Bay RPC Kent Fast, FDOT District Seven 2555 SHUMARD OAK BOULEVARD • TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-,2100 Phone: 850.488.8466/Suncom 278.8466 FAX: 850.921.0781/Suncom 291.0781 Internet address: htti)://www.dca.state.fl.us CRITICAL STATE CONCERN FIELD OFFICE COMMUNITY PLANNING EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 2796 Overseas Highway, Suite 212 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Marathon, FL 33050-2227 Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 (305) 289-2402 (850) 488-2356 (850) 413-9969 (850) 488-7956 Tampa SavXegional Planning Council Chair Vice-Chair Secretary/Treasurer Executive Director Commissioner Barbara Sheen Todd Commissioner Steve Simon Commissioner Jane von Hahmann Manny L. Pumariega September 11, 2003 Mr. Maura R, Minges Bausch and Lomb, Inc. One Bausch & Lomb Place Rochester, NY 14604 Subject: DRI #92 - Park Place, Notice of Proposed Change, City of Clearwater Dear Mr. Mirages; _ The Council received additional information submitted in conjunction with the above-referenced application on October 20, 2003 by Mr. Timothy Johnson Therefore, with this date constituting commencement of the Council's 30-day review period, comments will be provided by our agency on Wednesday, November 19, 2003. Any comments received from the review agencies (identified below) will be appended to our correspondence. If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me here at the Council (ext. 255). Thank you. Sincerely, _ J eyer DRI Coordinator cc: Mr. Nick Shackelton, CIG, Inc. Mr. Ramon Solis, Pinellas County MPO Mr. Tim Johnson, JPBR&B Mr. Kent Fast, FDOT Mr. Robert Pergolizzi,_ GCC, Inc. Ms. Marina Pennington, FDCA Ms.Gina Clayton,..City-of- Clearwater, J Mr. George Deakin, KHA RECEIVED OCT 2 7 2003 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 9455 Koger Boulevard, Suite 219, St. Petersburg, FL 3377,02-,2,4 ?? C?I ??RINATER Phone (727) 570-5151 FAX (727) 570-51 18 State Numbaal?s 13-066 www.tbrpc.org Tampa Say Regional Planning Council Chair Vice-Chair Secretary/Treasurer Executive Director Commissioner Barbara Sheen Todd Commissioner Steve Simon Commissioner Ja_ 1q ?von,4ahmann Manny L. Pumariega October 10, 2003 Mr. Maura R, Minges Bausch and Lomb, Inc. One Bausch & Lomb Place Rochester, NY 14604 Subject: Dear Mr. Minges: UG f I a Nd PLANNING Dc?pARTMENT CITY OF DRI #92 - Park Place, Notice of Proposed Change, City of Clearwater The staff of the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council has completed the review of the above- referenced NOPC Application submitted on September 11, 2003. The following serves as a background of the project, a summary of proposed modifications and the identification of additional information requested. BACKGROUND On September 1, 1983, the City of Clearwater granted a Development Order (Ordinance No. 3205- 83) to Metro Development Corporation for a 99.1-acre commercial and office development located at the northeast corner of the S.R. 60/U.S. 19 intersection. The project was originally approved to contain 1,500,000 square feet (sq. ft.) of office space and 460,000 sq. ft. of retail space. The Development Order has subsequently been amended four times, with the latest occurring on February 1, 2001 (Ordinance No. 6678-01). The amendments have cumulatively: modified the development parameters; authorized multi-family and hotel as approved uses; consolidated the entire project into a single phase; established and modified a land use equivalency matrix for various parcels; and extended the project buildout date by 18 years (to December 31, 2003) based on the phasing consolidation. The Development Order expires on December 31, 2003. The project is currently approved for the following development entitlements: PROJECT BUILDOUT OFFICE (Sq. Ft.) INDUSTRIAL (Sq. Ft.) RETAIL (Sq. Ft.) RESIDENTIAL (M,F. Units) December 31, 2003 404,639 200,000 81,120 390 9455 Koger Boulevard, Suite 219, St. Petersburg, FL 33702-2491 Phone (727) 570-5151 FAX(727)S70-5118 State Number 513-5066 www.tbrpc.org 0 0 _C_t R"-NT NLOP-C-E-SCRIPTLO-N The applicant has requested an additional five year extension of the project buildout date (to December 31, 2008). COUNTS/RF,ni; EST FOR ADDITIO]?A>?,?I?ORMATIQL?[ Additional Information, Appendices A, B and C. Please supply a copy of the HCS electronic files used in the traffic analysis, or provide the multi-page printout for each HCS analysis. If electronic files are submitted, please provide an equivalency table that notes the intersection name, the corresponding electronic file name, the year of the analysis, and the development scenario being analyzed. 2. Coordinated Signal Timing, HCS Arterial Analysis, Appendices A, B and C. In the arterial analysis, if the traffic signals are assumed to be coordinated, then all of the traffic signals in the analyzed arterial should have the same cycle length. Please revise the arterial analysis accordingly. 3. Year 2008, HCS Arterial Analysis, Appendix C. In the year 2008 arterial analysis, the computed "v/c" for each segment should have a value of 1.0 or less. Please revise the arterial analysis accordingly. As noted in the Highway Capacity Manual 2000, Page 15-5, top sidebar note, at the top of the page, right margin, "The v/c ratio (X) for a lane group cannot be greater than 1.0 to compute uniform delay." For example, at the bottom of Page C-17, in the eastbound direction, the v/c ratio for the SR 60 link of Hercules Avenue to Belcher Road is greater than 1.0 (it is 1.17.0). Please revise this arterial analysis and the other arterial analysis so that the v/c for each segment has a value of 1.0, or less. 4. V/C Ratios, HCS Signalized Intersection Analysis, Appendix C. In the year 2008 signalized intersection analysis, the computed "We" for each lane group.must have a value of 1.0 or less. Please revise the signalized intersection analysis accordingly. . If the v/c ratio is larger than 1.0, it indicates queue carryover from one period to another. The standard HCS analysis does not consider queue carryover from one period to another. For example, at the bottom of Page C-11, the westbound left has a v/c ratio greater than 1.0 (it is 1.21). Please revise this signalized intersection analysis and the other intersection analyses so that the v/c for any lane group has a value of 1.0, or less. 5. Intersection Capacity Consumed by Full-Project, Appendix C, Pages C-1 and C-2. Please make the following changes in the "Intersection Capacity Consumed by Full-Project" methodology, on Pages C-l.and C-2. The total intersection capacity should be revised so that the capacity of the intersection is the sum of the capacity of the critical movements (the critical movements are noted by the software), not the sum of the capacity of all movements. The intersection capacity needs to be adjusted from the noted level of service E capacity to level of service D capacity. The adjustment factor is 0.885. Please multiply the intersection capacities by 0.885 to obtain the level of service D capacity. The HCS analysis is for the critical 15 minute period within the PM peak hour. The software divides the input "volumes" by the PHF when calculating the "adjusted flow rate." Accordingly, please divide the "Full-Project" volumes by the PHF to derive the project volumes that are used by the HCS software to calculate level of service. 6. Exhibit D: Park Place DRI Substantial Deviation Determination Chart. There appears to be many discrepancies between the NOPC application Exhibit D, and the other information in the NOPC application. For example, in Exhibit D, in the "Type and Land Use" column, for the office category, it is stated in the far right column titled "Previous DO Change and Date" that the latest previous approval was for "795,520 SF GFA." Then in footnote 1, it is noted that some of the office was traded for multi-family, so that the remaining office after the trade-off is "635,680 SF GFA." This is not consistent with the information contained in Exhibit B (Traffic Analysis Report, Dated September 2003). In Exhibit B, page 2 , it is noted that the latest approved development is: Retail = 81,10 SF Office = 404,639 SF Light Industrial = 2 00,000 SF Multi-family = 390 DU Another inconsistency is that in Exhibit D, for the residential category, it is noted in the "Proposed Plan" column that "Proposed amendment will allow office development on an additional parcel (Parcel 6) to be converted to multi-family." This proposed conversion is not discussed in Exhibit B (Traffic Analysis Report, Dated September 2003). Please revise Exhibit D, and the other NOPC application information so that there is consistency from document to document. 7. Although not stated in the NOPC application, it is assumed that the developer is seeking an identical five-year extension of the Development Order expiration date (to December 31, 2008). If this is correct, appropriate representation to this fact should be incorporated into the application and the proposed amendatory language. The proposed Master Development Plan identifies a last revised date of August 22, 2003. Please identify all proposed changes to the Map and the prior date of revision(s). 0 0 Comments received from the Florida Department of Transportation have been appended to this correspondence. No comments have-been received from any of the other review entities. It is my understanding that comments from the City of Clearwater and the Pinellas County MPO will be submitted to your attention under separate cover. Please address any/all agency issues simultaneously and respond to all these parties identified below. If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me (ext. 255) or Mr. George Deakin directly (813/620- 1460). Thank you. Sincerely, oJ? hn 1. Meyer D Coordinatc JMM cc: Mr. Nick Shackelton, CIG, Inc. Mr. Ramon Solis, Pinellas County MPO Mr. Tim Johnson, JPBR&B Mr. Kent Fast, FDOT Mr. Robert Pergolizzi, GCC, Inc. Ms. Marina Pennington, FDCA ?M_ s Gina Clayton, City of-Clearwaer ] Mr. George Deakin, KHA d? ewcct-09-03 03:43P FDOT Dis Planning 813 97 443 5127800 P_01 % 3 Florida Departinent of Transportation 11201 N. WK-1"y Drwe - iompo. f I Y4.1*,", AA.,e, • Phone 18131 975 6000 0 1-800 125 /220 JEB RUSH JOSE,1RRN:11 GOV ERN01Z SECRETARY October 9, 2003 Mr. John Meyer DRI Review Coordinator Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council 9455 Koger Boulevard - Suite 219 St. Petersburg, Florida 33702 Re: Park Place NOPC (DRI# 92) . - Pinellas County, Florida . Dear Mr. Meyer: We reviewed the transportation analysis for the Park Place DRI. The request is primarily to extend the project buildou t date until December 31, 2008. Approximately 100,000 square feet of light industrial land use is as yet unbuilt. Another 100,000 square feet of office is identified as "planned" on the Map H. We have some comments which need to be addressed by the developer- 1) At the trwisportation methodology meeting we did not discuss what constitutes a "recent' traffic count. However I was expecting traffic counts to be more recent, than July 2001 for Drew Street and for SR 60. Please ask the applicant to describe current traffic conditions for these streets and explain why these 2001 counts should still be considered acceptable. Drew Street cw-lies approximately 31% of project traffic and SR 60 carries 38%, of project traffic from the site. 2) in the HCS arterial analysis for SR 60, the cycle lengths should be the sarne if the signals are to be coordinated for both 2003 and 2008 time frames. Why was riot an arterial analysis completed for Drew Street also? Please revisit the analysis and revise if warranted. 3) I do not follow the logic of Tables 2A and 2B of the analysis. It appears that with transit and retail pass-by capture reductions, the retail parcels will experience a very significant reduction in traffic generated at the driveways- Please verify that pass-by traffic does not exceed 100% of adjacent street traffic. Also ask the applicant to explain the process used to reduce the external traffic. Perhaps one table with a column for each category of reduction would assist the review agencies in determining the accuracy of the calculations. www.dul.uate fl,US ®RECYCLrD PAPI [ ¦ ct-09-03 03:44P F* Dist 7 Planning ep 975 6443 5127800 P.01 4) It appear9 that Table 2B is depicting project traffic that has been built already, and is thus on the roadway, How does the 100,040 square feet 'of office in Parcel 6 get counted?. Please comment. Thank you for this opportunity to comment. Sincerely, Kent Fast, AICP DPI Coordinator cc: TBRPC mail out list U: \p1730kf\dri-revi\driO3 \031009.092.doc Received Time Oct. 9. 3:44PM t ?? _pp 0 d F f A Tampa Say 7Zeyional Planning Council Chair Vice-Chair Secretary/Treasurer Executive Director Commissioner Barbara Sheen Todd Commissioner Steve Simon Commissioner Jane von Hahmann Manny L. Pumariega September 11, 2003 CEI\ E SEP 15 2003 Mr. Maura R, Minges Bausch and Lomb, Inc. F'LAPtB?JG pEPARTNBER9 s One Bausch & Lamb Place Rochester, NY 14604 CITY OF CLEARWATET\ Subject. DRI #92 - Park Place, Notice of Proposed Change, City of Clearwater Dear Mr. Minges: The Council received the above-referenced Notice of Proposed Change (NOPC) application today. The required review fee and NOPC Review Fee Contract were previously submitted. Therefore, with today constituting commencement of the Council's 30-day review period, comments will be provided by our agency on Friday, October 10, 2003. Any comments received from the review agencies (identified below) will be appended to our correspondence. If you should have any question(s), please do not hesitate to contact me here at the Council (ext. 255). Thank you. Sincerely, . r 2oord7imator cc: Mr. Nick Shackelton, CIG, Inc. Mr. Tim Johnson, JPBR&B Mr. Robert Pergolizzi, GCC, Inc. Ms: Gina Clayton,_ City of Clwtr. } Mr. Ramon Solis, Pinellas County MPO Mr. Kent Fast, FDOT Ms. Marina Pennington, FDCA Mr. George Deakin, KHA 9455 Koger Boulevard, Suite 219, St. Petersburg, FL 33702-2491 Phone (727) 570-5151 FAX (727) S70-5118 State Number 513-5066 www.tbrpc.org ~ I / y ~~,3- - 9~0I o r l~ c ~ ~ ~ DREW STREET N _ PARCEL 1 LAND USE EXIST NG PLANNED TOTAL RETAIL/ LIGHT INDUSTRIAL COM M ER CAL 81,120 SF 0 81,120 SF. 0 150 300 PARCEL 3 2~~, ~Q~ SF (ioo,ooo sF ExisnNC) OFF CE 304, 6 ~9 SF 100, 000 S 404, 639 SF . EXISTING STING ^ LT. N DU STR AL 100 000 SF 100 ACCESS HESS 9 , 000 SF 200, 000 SF ~a~ ~ ~ ~ << ~ MULTI-FAMILY o` MULTI - FAM LY ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , 390 DU ~ . O D U 3 9 0 D U ~ 234 D.U. RESIDENTIAL ~ (234 MULTI-FAMILY D.U. EXIST) 485, 759 SF 200, 000 SF 685, 759 SF TOTAL 390 DU 0 DU 390 DU EXISTING ACCESS o NATURAL Q AREA 0 rn ~ ~ o ~ Q OFFICE ~~Q~ PARCEL 2 ~ . z 82,179 SF OFFICE - ~°JV MULTI-FAMILY ~ 101,900 SF PARCEL 8 PARCEL 4 ~ (82,179 SF EXISTING) 15 6 ~ . U . a (tU1,900 SF EXISTING) ~G (156 MULTI-FAMILY D.U. EXIST) Qv FU T COMMERICAL Q~~ ACC (RETAIL) Q PARCEL 5 PARCEL 6 `-FUTURE ACCESS NOTES: 5 5, 2 7 8 S F (120,560 SF OFFICE EXISTING) (100,000 SF OFFICE PLANNED) 1. THE PROPOSED AMOUNT OF SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR INDIVIDUAL UNDEVELOPED PARCELS ARE BASED ON BEST AVAILABLE MARKET INFORMATION AND ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE. . PARCEL 7 Q~~-~"E THE AMOUNT OF TOTAL DEVELOPMENT,. HOWEVER WILL NOT EXCEED THE AMOUNT OF DEVELOPMENT APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER. (55,278 SF EXIST ON 2 2 0, 5 6 0 S F 2. THAT PORTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT THAT REMAINS TO BE DEVELOPED IS REFERRED TO PARCELS 7 AND 9) AS THE "PLANNED DEVELOPMENT". THE BUILD-OUT DATE FOR THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND FOR THE TOTAL PROJECT IS DECEMBER 31, 2008. OMMERCIA 3. CONVERSION RATES OF 1,000 SQUARE FEET OF LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT TO 633 PARCEL 9 COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT ARE HEREBY ESTABLISHED ON PARCEL 1 AS APPROVED BY ORDINANCE #5722-95 PARCEL 10 PARCEL 11 4. ANY MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WILL BE LIMITED TO PARCELS 2, 3, 6 AND . (11,303 SF EXISTING) (14,539 SF EXISTING) 8. 5. PARCEL 6 IS PLANNED .FOR 100,000 SF OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT. CONVERSION RATES OF GULF-TO-BAY BOULEVARD 1,000 SF OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT TO 2.40 MULTI-FAMILY UNITS WITH A MAXIMUM OF 240 UNITS, OR 1,000 SF OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT TO 2.44 HOTEL ROOMS WITH A MAXIMUM OF . 244 UNITS ARE HEREBY ESTABLISHED FOR PARCEL 6 AS APPROVED BY ORDINANCE 6678-01. COMMERCIAL 2.5,842 SF (RETAIL) (25,842 SF EXISTING) PREPARED FOR: Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. ~ n n n i i DRAWN Land Development Consulting /J ivi _ CHECKED r;//r r PARK PLACE DRI MASTER DEVELO fJ ELOPMENT PLAN Q.c. REVISED: AUGUST 22, 2003 Exhibit "C" to Park Place DRI NOPC Application J