PROPOSED REVISION
\>
)
CITYbF CLEARWATER
Interdepartment Correspondence Sheet
Prepared Farm
TO:
FROM:
COPIES:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
Community Development Coordinator
v-Gfty Clerk
City Manager
ROUTE TO:
Initial &
Forward
Community Development Block Grant
Program Revidon
July 13. 1979
1.
20-
3. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -
--------- .(
------(
- _d _ _ _ _ _ - - -- (
) SEE ME
DRAFT REPLY. FOR MY SIGNATURE
( ) PREPARE JOINT RE'POIT
) FOR LEGAL PREPARATION
) FOR CLEARANCE
) NEED APPROVAL OF - __ _u '
) INVESTIGATE AND REPORT
) HANDLE TO COMPLETION
) CLEAR WITH ALL AGENCIES CONCERNED
) EXPECT REPLY _ _ _ __u _ _ u __ u.
ESTIMATE COST
( ) FOR NECESSARY ACTION
FOR IMMEDIATE ACTION
\ ) DRAFT LETTER FOR AGENDA
) MAY I COMMENT ON THIS?
) FOR YOUR INFORMATION
) FOR YOUR FILES
) FOR YOUR SIGNATURE
) RETURN
) JOB ACCOMPLISHED
) REPLY DIRECTLY TO CORRESPONDENT; SEND Copy TO THIS OFFICE
( ) CONTACT CORRESPONDENT; REPORT ACTION TAKEN TO THIS OFFICE
) SUBMIT YOUR RECOMMENDATIONS OR COMMENTS IN WRITING
( ) PREPARE ROUGH SKETCH
REMARKS:
Attached 18 a letter from the Dept. of HUD dated July 6. 1979 on the above-
mentioned 8ubj eet.
Jtt'E,\VED
'~Ul 13 t;73
r'
\,
,~.'l ,I
/
(/ '.-
- -~'.'
,.
! ... \....
, / /1- ,,/~ /
'7 - ;J-S '-- 7 9
(-..
/'J,
r.~~ ." 1 4 ..t'L,'~J'~!(.
\i,...... \" ...
1 t .<,
/
...
~d
(Signature)
(Position Title J
.
.Ie
REGION IV
I I . w, V~~\)t. ,.'
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT '\ 1\.....j~O L...". '.'. . \l t y)."~
JACKSONVILLE AREA OFFICE (\ . . \ r'. /~. '1,1 I)"~
PENINSULAR PLAZA \ \ I',~ \ \' V \
661 RIVERSIDE AVENUE \i9' '. ~V.' . . ~~\:\" (/~I
.f \ ....1
JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA 322041 . ~
July 6,1979 /(/ ,..'
<' ., \/' IN RE;:PLY RE;:FE;:R TO:
\ 1\
',"\-(\" 4 . 6 CM-B
\ \ \
\:~". (RSW)
~1tAENr Olt'
~~ ~OOO~ :\
\Jlllllt~/
>'3"'30 ~-4
Mr. Anthony L. Shoemaker
City Manager
City of Clearwater
P. O. Box 4748
Clearwater, Florida 33518
Dear Mr. Shoemaker:
Subject: CommunIty Deveiopmeritl3lock Grant Program
Grant No. B-78-MC-12-0002
Proposed Revision
This is in response to your letter of June 28, 1979.
Since the activity is within the 10% limit imposed by the
regulations, it is considered a local amendment not needing
HUD approval.
We have looked it over and offer no objection to it.
s n
'ty Planning
Division