1987 SAND KEY DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT (DRI)
II
I
I'
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
DF~:179 DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT
Eit
~PPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL
SHERATON SAND KEY RESORT
FOR
GRAND COULOIR CORPORATION
f-~~-=-'- ,~,~
I ~ .., . '_.-" ._... ~ ",. ". .'"
I' .'. .,,' , . " ~ . ',', '. :.. -.~",'" I
T./'/"l~ h P,/~ f I
PREPARED BY:! REGION/./. PlANNIN3 COUNCIL J
tI ~g~n~:.~~rim Landscapa Archllacl"'a
.. 'Planning Environmental Sciences
201 E. Kennedy Blvd. Suite 334 Tampa. FL 33602
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
".~...,.,-~~
:, :)',>l;r'4.~!:..]
.',7 :,,1~ 1~ {"~
,:t ':";~:J'-;~ \I
~-'.,'-'''l!l
:.:JIt .~... ,..'..
~".:\, ,;;~l. ..4i:.? }!.I.,
:.;...:a '}"IGJ~.~
',':~i~ - -.-tiI~
t,;;J~IlZIB5m
Group
Services;
Engineering
Planning
Sciences
Landscape
Architecture
Wade-Trim
November 12, 1987
Ms. Suzanne Cooper, DRI Coordinator
Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council
9455 Koger Boulevard
Suite 219
St. Petersburg, FL 33702
SUBJECT: DRI 1179 Sheraton Sand Key Resort Expansion
Dear Ms. Cooper:
On behalf of Grand Couloir Corporation, Wade-Trim, Inc., is
pleased to submit this Development of Regional Impact Application
for Development Approval (DRI/ADA) for the expansion of the
Sheraton Sand Key Resort in Clearwater, Florida.
A total of 31 copies have been delivered to all individuals on
the DRI application transmittal list. If additional copies are
required, or any supplemental information needed, please don't
hesitate to contact me or Ms. Bonnie Prinse of our staff.
Sincerely,
'-
.-~-_._----------
cc: T. Gene Prescott
Gerard N. van Dahlen, Esquire
Russ Kimball
Jack Dronzek
Bob Kay, Esqui re
Timothy Johnson, Esquire
Pat Alsup
"I ':'.1';_--:.
J:.~; /. ~~ ',"
'::-~ .:..-).....-: ~:...
C>Ci'l)~):-
\'.f.t ,.:..... L
TA,'.\FA BAY
REGIONAL Plr'\NNING COUNQI.
BJP1:37
ZZZ2067.01
Wade-Trim.lnc,
Member of the Wade-Trim Group
201 E Kennedy Boulevard . Suite 334 · Tampa, Florida 33602
813-221-2090 . telecopler: 813-229-0974
I'
I
I'
I
I
I,
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
...""..11
r"'~'I""
( ==]
.. ...r..,"'..1
.~tlII.
SHERATON SAND KEY RESORT EXPANSION
DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT
APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL
Prepared For:
Grand Couloir Corporation
1160 Gulf Boulevard
Clearwater, Florida 33515
Wade-Trim
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I'
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
Y.lJlll'''''~.
r~" 11ll...
[=, =]
.. 'lI'.,.'"' ...
.~....
Applicant/Developer:
Civil Engineer/Planners
Environmental Consultant:
Legal Counsel:
Architects:
Landscape Architects:
SSKl:29
PROJECT TEAM
Grand Couloir Corporation
1160 Gulf Boulevard
Clearwater, Florida 33515
Wade-Trim, Inc.
201 E. Kennedy Blvd., Suite 334
Tampa, Florida 33602
Mr. Tim Johnson, Esquire
Johnson, Blakley, et al
911 Chestnut Street
Clearwater, Florida 34616
Nathan, Evans, Pounders, Taylor
Memphis, Tennessee
Edward D. Stone, Jr. & Associates
Orl ando, Florida
Wade-Trim
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
31P""III!!1
"~"i""
[:: = 1
"~I..."'.lI
8._"'11
oRI APPLICATION TRANSMITTAL LIST
Ms. Suzanne T. Cooper, DRI Coordinator
Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council
9455 Koger Boulevard, Suite 219
St. Petersburg, Florida 33702
Mr. Richard Adair
Florida Department of Transportation
4950 West Kennedy Boulevard, Suite 500
Tampa, Florida 33609
Ms. Terry Porter, DRI Coordinator
Mr. Louis Fernandez
Department of Environmental Regulation
7601 Highway 301 North
Tampa, Florida 33610
Mr. George Percy, State Historic Pres. Officer
Chief, Bureau of Historic Preservation
Division of Historic Resources
Department of State, The Capitol
Tallahassee, Florida 32399
Mr. Mike Allen
Office of Environmental Services
Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission
620 South Meridian
Tallahassee, Florida 32399
Mr. Clark Hull, Sr. Env. Scientist
Resource Regulation Department
Southwest Florida Water Management District
2379 Broad Street
Brooksville, Florida 33512-9712
Mr. Bill Howell
Bureau of Biological & Interpretive Services
Department of Natural Resources
3900 Commonwealth Boulevard, Room 508
Tallahassee, Florida 32303
Mr. Dennis Harmon, Chief
Bureau of Economic Analysis
Florida Department of Commerce
406 Fletcher Building
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-8132
10 Copies ADA
1 Copy ADA
2 Copies ADA
Response to
Question 19-A
of ADA Legal
Description
1 Copy'ADA
5 Copies ADA
2 Copies ADA
1 Copy ADA
Wade-Trim
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I,
iI~"""1I
., ",~I I~ 'I
t --l
.. .r..f' ....
11.-....
Mr. Tom Beck, Chief
Department of Community Affairs
Division of Local Resource Management
Rhyne Building
2740 Centerview Drive
Tallahassee, Florida 32399
Mr. A. J. Sal em
Planning Division
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Post Office Box 4970
Jacksonville, Florida 32232-0019
1 Copy ADA
1 Copy ADA
Mr. Connor Davis
Marine Fisheries Commission
2562 Executive Center Circle, E., Suite 211
Tallahassee, Florida 32399
1 Copy ADA
Mr. Gene Heath, General Manager
West Coast Regional Water Supply Authority
2535 landmark Drive, Suite 211
Clearwater, Florida 33519
Mr. William Saalman, III
U.S. Department of Agriculture
Soil Conservation Service
5118 North 56th Street, Suite 250
Tampa, Florida 33610
Mr. Jim Muller
Florida Natural Areas Inventory
254 East Sixth Avenue
Tallahassee, Florida 32303
Mr. Wilbur Barnes
Executive Director
Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority
14840 49th Street North
Clearwater, Florida 33520
Hr. Hugh Pascoe
Pinellas Area Transportation Study
Metropolitan Planning Organization
440 Court St reet
Clearwater, Florida 33516
1 Copy ADA
1 Copy ADA
1 Copy ADA
1 Copy ADA
1 Copy ADA
SSKl:29
Wade-Trim
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
21"""'lII1:I
r~'! I...,
[= = J
.. "".,,'" ..
:1.-...
SECTlON(S)
Part I.
1-2
3-5
6-8
8-9
Part II.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
SHERATON SAND KEY RESORT EXPANSION
DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT
APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL
UNDER SECTION 380.06(6) FLORIDA STATUTES
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SUBJECT
List of Exhibits
List of Tables
Application Information
Statement of Intent
Applicant Information
Development Information
Permit Information
General Information
Maps A - J
A. General Location Map
B. Aerial Photograph
C. Topography Map
D. Land Use Map
E. Soil s Map
F. Vegetation Associations Map
G. Master Drainage Plan (not relevant to this project)
H. Master Development Plan
I. Service Areas Map
J. Existing Highway and Transportation Network (not
relevant to this project)
General Project Description
Environment and Natural Resources:
Environment and Natural Resources:
Environment and Natural Resources:
Environment and Natural Resources:
(Deleted from Review)
Environment and Natural Resources: Flood Plains
Environment and Natural Resources: Vegetation
and Wi 1 dl He
Environment and Natural Resources: Historical
and Archaeological Sites
Economy: Employment and Economic Characteristics
Public Facilities: Wastewater Management
Public Facilities: Drainage
Air
Land
Water
Wetlands
PAGE NO.
i i i
iv
1-1
1-2
1-3
1-3
12-1
13-1
14-1
15-1
16-1
17-1
18-1
19-1
20-1
21-1
22-1
Wade-Trim
1'-;-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'JIP'''''IIIII.
r~'1 I" 'I
t _, =]
lL ..r.,,'" ..
3I..IIi.
SECTlON{S)
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
APPENDIX A
APPENDIX B
SSKl: 29
SUBJECT
PAGE NO.
Public Facilities: Water Supply 23-1
Public Facilities: Solid Waste 24-1
Publ ic Facil iti es: Energy 25-1
Public Facilities: Education (Deleted from review) 26-1
Public Facilities: Recreation and Open Space 27-1
Public Facilities: Health Care 28-1
Public Facilities: Police 29-1
Public Facilities: Fire 30-1
Public Transportation Facilities: Transportation 31-1
Considerations
Housing: Provisions of Residential Units 32-1
(Deleted from review))
A-I
B-1
.
Wade-Trim
i i
1:----
, I'
I
I,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.""""IlII
r~'i~'
[== ]
A"lIr..,"'..
!i~..
EXHIBIT
NO.
7-1
17-1
19-1
21-1
23-1
24-1
25-1
25-2
28-1
29-1
30-1
31-1
31-2
31-3
31-4
31-5
31-6
31-7
31-8
LIST OF EXHIBITS
TITLE
PAGE NO.
Letter from Dept. of Community Affairs 7-1
Letter from the City of Clearwater 17-3
Letter from Division of Historical Resources 19-2
Letter to the City of Clearwater 21-4
Letter to the City of Clearwater 23-4
Letter to the City of Clearwater 24-3
Letter to Florida Power Corporation 25-3
Letter to City of Clearwater 25-4
Letter from Emergency Medical Services 28-2
Letter to City of Clearwater Police Department 29-2
Letter from City of Clearwater Fire Department 30-2
Existing Roadway Net...ork 31-2
Existing P.M. Peak Hour Turning Movement Volumes 31-4 & 5
Existing Intersection P.M. Peak Hour
Levels of Service
31-9
31-11
31-13
31-16
31-18-20
31-23
Letter from Pinellas County
1997 Background Traffic
1997 Project Trip Distribution
1997 P.M. Peak Hour Turning Movement Volumes
1997 Intersection P.M. Peak Hour
Levels of Service
Wade-Trim
i i i
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~,.""""a
:t *'~' Ira. 'f
[=, =]
1\ <11I'".'" .I
..~.
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE
NO. TITLE
20-1 Construction Expenditures and Employment
21-1 Estimated Average Daily Wastewater Flows
22-1 Total Drainage Area in Acres
23-1 Estimated Average Daily Potable Water Demands
24-1 Estimated Average Daily Solid Waste Generation
25-1 Estimated Average Daily Electrical Energy
Const ruct ion
31-1 Roadway Link Analysis - Existing Conditions
31-2A Roadway Link Analysis - Year 1997 Conditions with
100% Occupancy
31-2B Roadway link Analysis - Year 1997 Conditions with
73% Occupancy
31-2C Roadway Link Analysis - Year 1997 Occupancy
Conditions Summary
31-3 Intersection Analysis
SSKl:30
iv
PAGE NO.
20-2
21-3
22-1
23-3
24-2
25-1
31-6
31-21
31-22
31-23
31-24
Wade-Trim
I'
!I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
z
o
~
~
<
~
~
o
~
z
~
z
o
~
~
<
u
~
~
~
~
<
I'
I
I
I
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I'
."""IIll:.
r~'II~'"
[....- ]
" ~i.,;Y ..
.._tlII.
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
DIVISION OF LOCAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
BUREAU OF LAND AND WATER MANAGEMENT
2571 EXECUTIVE CENTER CIRCLE, EAST
TAlLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32301
DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT
APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL UNDER SECTION 380.06(6),
FLORIDA STATUTES.
DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT
Application for Development Approval
Sheraton Sand Key Resort
Expansion
PART I. APPLICANT INFORMATION
I, C. Pat Alsup, the undersigned authorized agent of Grand Couloir
Corporation, hereby propose to undertake a Development of Regional
Impact as defined in Section 380.06, Florida Statutes, and Chapter
22F-2.07, Florida Administrative Code. In support thereof I
submit the following information concerning the Sheraton Sand Key
Resort which information is true and correct to the best of my
knowledge.
November 12, 1987
Date
--
\
/ I ' /
(v / .."'( /.l_'"
C. Pat Al sup
Grand Couloir Corporation
2. APPLICANT:
Grand Couloir Corporation
1160 Gulf Boulevard
Clearwater, Florida 33515
(813)595-1611
1-1
Wade-Trim
I'
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.~....
r",,~,ll~~
[ia =~
~ ..,.'" ..
~.
3. AUTHORIZED AGENT:
C. Pat Al sup
Grand Couloir Corporation
1160 Gulf Boulevard
Clearwater, Florida 33515
(813)595-1611
William A. Ockunzzi, Vice President
Wade-Trim, Inc.
201 E. Kennedy Blvd., #334
Tampa, Florida 33602
(813) 221-2090
4. ATTACH THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PERSONS HAVING FEE SIMPLE OR
LESSER ESTATE IN THE SITE.
Sand Key Investment Program I, Ltd.
a Florida Limited Partnership
Ms. Roberta Dennis, Vice President
7820 38th Avenue North
St. Petersburg, Florida 33710
5. ATTACH A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT SITE. INCLUDE
SECTION, TOWNSHIP AND RANGE.
The Northerly 408.21 feet of Parcel D (also known as Site V, Sand
Key) being a portion of Section 17, Township 29 South, Range 15
East, Pinel1as County, Florida, more particularly described as
foll ows:
For a point of reference commence at the Section corner common to
Sections 17, 18, 19 and 20 of said Township and Range, as now
established as having the coordinates (based on'the Pinel1as
County Grid System) of North 16500.72, East 31452.98; thence run
N89010'31"E, along the Section line dividing said Sections 17 and
20, a distance of 843.47 feet to an intersection with the center-
line of Gulf Boulevard (State Road No. 208) as now established as
a 100 foot right of way; thence S4201313111W alons said centerline
a distance of 263.93 feet to a point; thence N47 46'29"W, a
distance of 50.00 feet to the North8esterly right of way line of
said Gulf Boulevard; thence run N42' 13'31"E, along said Northwest-
erly right of way line, a distgnce of 241.79 feet for the point of
Beginning; thence continue N42 1313111E along said right of way a
distance of 408.21 feet; thence run N47 46'29"W, a distance of
(776.5 feet more or less deed) (1391 feet more or less field) to
the mean high water line (elevation 1.2 feet N.G.V.D. dated'
9/23/87), of the Gulf of Mexico; thence run Southerly along said
mean high water lin8 a distance of 475 feet more or less to a
point that lies N47 4~'29I1W, and 1149 feet ~ore or less distant
from the Poi nt of Begi nni ng; thence run S47 46' 29" E, a di stance of
1149 feet more or less to the Point of Beginning, containing
11.9588 acres more or less.
1-2
Wade-Trim
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.~""~.
r ""~' ,....
t --1
.. .r.,~ ..
II~.
6. TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT AND SIZE.
As defined by the Florida Administrative Code, Section 27F-2.026,
the Sheraton Sand Key Resort Expansion is presently classified as
a Hotel Development project. The Sheraton Sand Key's existing
390-room faCility will be undergoing expansion with the addition
of 750 suites and support amenities. The scope of the project
will include two new all suite towers, conference rooms, retail
areas, restaurants, lounges, in-door and outdoor pools, health
club, and housekeeping space. The expanded development
encompasses 11.96 acres on Sand Key.
7. HAVE YOU REQUESTED A DRI BINDING LETTER OF INTERPRETATION OR
VESTED RIGHTS DETERMINATION FROM THE DIVISION OF STATE PLANNING
PURSUANT TO SECTION 380.06(4), FLORIDA STATUTES?
No. Please refer to Exhibit 7-1, Mr. J. Thomas Beck's letter to
Mr. William Ockunzzi dated November 2, 1987.
8. LIST ALL LOCAL GOVERNMENTS WITH JURISDICTION OVER THE PROPOSED
DEVELOPMENT.
The City of Clearwater
9. LIST ALL AGENCIES (LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL) FROM WHICH APPROVAL
AND/OR A PERMIT MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INITIATION OF
DEVELOPMENT. INDICATE THE PERMIT OR APPROVAL FOR EACH AGENCY.
The City of Clearwater
Site Plan Approval
Building Permits
Utility Connections (Approval)
Development Order Approval
Department of Natural Resources
Construction permit for activities seaward of coastal
construction control line
Southwest Florida Water Management District
Stormwater management permit
Surface water management permit
(SSKI-2)
1-3
Wade-Tnm
I'
I
I-
I
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
"
i\\.
- - .-.
~- ...
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
2 5 7 1 E X E CUT I V E C E N T ERe IRe L E, E A ST. TAL L A HAS SEE, F LOR IDA 3 2 3 9 9
BOB MARTINEZ
GO\'eI'nOl'
THOMAS G. PELHAM
November 2, 1987 Secretary
Mr. William A. Ockunzzi
Wade-Trim, Incorporated
201 E. Kennedy Boulevard,
Tampa, Florida 33602
Ste. 334
Re: Sheraton Sand Key Resort
Dear Mr. Ockunzzi:
It is the Department's understanding that the Sheratc)n Sand
Key Resort, located in Clearwater, is seeking to renovate and
expand facilities on an existing 11.96 acre tract on Sand Key Is-
land. This correspondence is in response to your letter c)f Octo-
ber 1, 1987, which requests the Department's concurrence in ex-
cluding the renovation of existing facilities from those Develop-
ment of Regional Impact (DRI) review requirements that the! re-
mainder of the project must undergo.
Based on information supplied by you, the existing facili-
ties comprise a single structure consisting of 390 guest ::'ooms,
restaurants, shops and various ancillary activity rooms/aJ:'eas.
The Master site Plan and Construction Plans for these exi:3ting
facilities were submitted to the local governing body on ~Tune 20,
1973, and appear to have been approved by that body on AU<JUst 17,
1973.
Proposed expansion plans envision the addition of twC) towers
totaling 750 suites, conference rooms, retail space, day c:::are
facili ty, restaurants, and accompanying ancillary areas/uI3es. It
is our understanding that current plans call for the cons1:ruction
of a new 428 unit hotel tower, renovation of the existing hotel
structure, and subsequent construction of a second tower
comprising 322 suites and associated amenities. A ten-year
buildout period is expected.
You were correct in noting that the Florida Environmemtal
Land and Water Management Act of 1972 did not specificall:r ident-
ify hotel facilities as Developments of Regional Impact. Rules
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT. HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT · RESOURCE PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT
7-1
EXHIBIT 7-1
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Mr. William A. Ockunzzi
November 2, 1987
Page Two
pertaining to hotels were not immediately promulgated sub:;equent
to the Act's original passage. However, the Department did esta-
blish a pOlicy in April, 1983, through the issuance of a binding
letter, that included hotels under the DRI residential guidelines
and standards. Recent revisions to Chapter 380, Florida statutes
(F.S.), which took effect October 1, 1985, clearly established
Hotel/Motel DRI thresholds.
Therefore, based on the information as we understand it, the
Department concurs that the existing 390-unit Sheraton Salld Key
Resort development appears to predate the DRI hotel/motel thres-
hold requirements as set forth in Section 380.06, F.S. (1985),
and Chapter 27F-2, Florida Administrative Code (FAC).
consequently, the proposed renovation of the' existing 390'.unit,
8-story hotel tower appears to be exempt from the DRI/ADA review
requirements of Section 380.06, F.S.; provided however, that (1)
no development, as defined in 380.04, F.S., has occurred at the
Sheraton Sand Key Resort under local government approval
subsequent to April, 1983, and (2) that the proposed renovation
will not constitute "development" as defined under Sectioll
380.04, F.S.
In light of this, the Department requests that relevant
details of the proposed renovation to the existing tower be
appropriately described in the DRI Application for Development
Approval. You should also be aware that, in the absence ()f a
binding letter, this agency reserves the right to Cletermille that
Chapter 380, F.S., is applicable to your project.
Should you have any questions or comments 'regarding 1:his
matter, please contact Larry Slayback in the Bureau of State
Planning at (904) 488-4925.
Sincerely,
~~homas Beck
Chief, Bureau of
State Planning
TB/lsh
cc: Ms. Suzanne Cooper (TBRPC)
Mr. Chris Papandreas .(City of Clearwater)
7-2
I '
, II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
z
o
~
~
~
~
~
U
00.
~
'~
~
u
~
~
o
~!
~
~
z
<
00.
~
<
~
II
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
" .
" .
. ....
N
~
. .'
,
o 0.25 0.5
SCALE IN MilES
CHESTNUT ST.
PROJECT SITE
o
a::
o
Cl
a::
<
~
a::
w
I-
<
~
a::
<
w
d
ULMERTON RD.
Ct)
5
o
a::
Z
<
~ W AlSINGHAM RD.
d
a::
III
Cl
o
i:
SHERATON
SAND ,KEY RESORT
~ Wade-Trim
.... Engineering Landscape Architecture
o Planning Environmental Sciences
DREW ST.
CLEVELAND ST.
BELLEAIR RD.
>
<
it
;:)
o
Ct)
Ct)
i
E. BAY OR.
d
~
CD
W
~
i
i
III
Ct)
GUlF-TO-BAY
BLVD.
~
c
z
<
~
~
Cl
:f
GENERAL LOCATION
A
, I
I
I ' ,
,
I N
~
I
, ,
0 500 1000 2000 V14
I El14
I A11
Gulf EL 12
I of
Mexico PROJECT SITE
I
I
V14
I EL 15 Clearwater
Harbor
I
I LEGEND
1.1 - 1.30 Zone of 100-Yr. flood ; base flood elevations
I & flood hazard factors determined.
V14
El13 V1 - V30 Zone of 100-Yr, coastal flood with velocity;
I base flood elevation. & flood hazard factors
not determined.
I EL 99 aase Flood Elevation
A11
EL 12
I
,.
Ifh ~ . .
I .~ .
SHERATON MAP
I SAND KEY RESORT FLOOD PLAINS C
~Wade-Trim
I' B Engineering landscape Architecture
Planning Envlronmenta' Science.
I
I
I,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
. .: '. ;': .~ .:..,.: .' .
". ." .'
. ::":" ~:. .... "',, ":"0.' :-. .: ....:.. ':' 'f ,:".'''' ". .
N
(t
, ,
0 500 1000 2000
Gulf
of
Mexico
181
540
Clearwater
Harbor
.
LEGEND
133 - Multiple Dwelling Units - Low Rise
134 - Multiple Dwelling Units - High Rise
181 - Swimming Beaches
185 - Parks
540 - Bays & Estuaries
710 - Beaches - Other than Swimming
322 - Coastal Scrub 11.96 Ac.
~ . .
.~ .
SHERATON MAP
SAND KEY RESORT LAND USE
~ Wade-Trim . & VEGETATION D&F
,Engln..rlng landlcape Architect...
Planning Environmental Sclencel
N
~ .
, I
0 0,25 0.5 1
SCALE IN MILES
II
I
I,
I
I
.
A
CHESTNUT ST.
I.
PROJECT SITE: ,'/
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ULMERTON RD.
I
. .'
. "
WAlSINGHAM RD.
d
a::
I&l
Cl
Q
it
I
, .'
. .0'
I
SHERATON
SAND KEY RESORT
~Wade-Trim .
, ' Engine.rlng landlcape Architecture
,Planning Environmental ,Sclenc..
DREW ST.
CLEVELAND ST.
o
GULF-TO-BAY
BLVD.
~
Q
Z
<
~
~
C!:l
:
BELLEAIR RD.
>
<
it
::)
o
Ct)
Ct)
i
E. BAY OR,
LEGEND
o WATER TREATMENT PLANT
. SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT
A POLICE STAnON
. FIRE STAn ON
B3 HOSPITAL
ci
~
CD
W
~
o
z
i
w
Ct)
SERVICE AREAS
I,
I
II
I
I,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
..-....
r~'ll.....
[-= 1
~ "r.,~ ...
~.
12. GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION
A. REFERRING TO MAP H DESCRIBE AND DISCUSS IN GENERAL TERMS ALL
MAJOR ELEMENTS OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IN ITS COMPLETE
FORM.
The existing Sheraton Sand Key Resort has been in operation
at this location since 1975 and has grown throughout the
years as a pre~iere resort on Clearwater Beach. The
expansion presently planned for is to be located on an 11.96
acre parcel of land due south of the existing hotel facility.
The expansion plan is a natural progression from years of
continued growth and is considered a viable solution to
satisfy the area's growing demand and need for additional
resort facilities.
The proposed addition includes a major central building
component and surrounding support and recreational
amenities. As depicted on Map H, the hotel addition will
incorporate 750 all-suite hotel rooms in two high-rise towers
and will add a total of approximately 1050 new parking spaces
(garage and ground level). Low rise building areas designed
around the towers will include a 50-75 seat ,lobby bar, 250
seat entertainment lounge, 250-300 seat cafe, 80-100 seat
restaurant, 150 seat bar/lounge, retail space, health spa,
day care center, indoor pool, ballroom/meeting rooms,
administrative/registration area, exhibit hall, rest room
facilities and general lobby area. The outside recreation
facilities will include an outdoor pool, pool bar, terrace
area, and various other recreational amenities.
Construction is scheduled to start in the Spring of 1988 with
completion planned for late 1989, open for business for the
89-90 winter season.
8. PROVIDE A BREAKDOWN OF THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED LAND USES ON
THE SITE FOR EACH PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT THROUGH COMPLETION OF
THE PROJECT. USE LEVEL II OF THE FLORIDA LAND USE AND COVER
CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM: A TECHNICAL REPORT, AVAIlABLE FROM
EACH REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL. REFER TO MAPS D (EXISTING
lAND USE) AND H (MASTER PLAN). USE THE FORMAT BELOW AND
TREAT EACH LAND USE CATEGORY AS MUTUAlLY EXCLUSIVE.
The 11.96 acre site is currently vacant property and includes
beachfront land on the Gulf of Mexico. Much of Sand Key has
been altered over the years by man and contains little
vegetation of noteworthy value within the interior portions
of the site (please see Section 18, Vegetation and Wildlife).
The property has been cleared and contains scrub grasses,
isolated sea oat strands (which will be the focus of a
re-nourishment and re-vegetation program described in
Question 12.C).
Wade.Trim
12-1
I'
I
I
I
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.,..,.....
r ~~I .....
t _, '= 2
J. ..r",~ ..
.~-tlII.
Current land use for the parcel of property planned for
development is classified as Coastal Scrub, Florida Land Use,
Cover and Forms Classification System (Class Definition 322).
The development, upon completion, will incorporate several
elements ,of change in land use, all of ~ich are considered
as Tourist Services, FLUCCS Code Number 145.
C.
PROVIDE A GENERAL DISCUSSION OF THE SITE PLANNING APPROACH TO
BE UTILIZED FOR THIS PROJECT. INCLUOE AS PART OF THE
DISCUSSION CONSIDERATIONS OF UNIQUE TOPOGRAPHICAL AND OTHER
FEATURES INVOLVED IN THE SITE PLANNING PROCESS.
Sand Key, a developed barrier island in Clearwater, Florida,
has provided the Sheraton Sand Key Resort with natural
geographic amenities. The site is accessible by motor
vehicle from the north (through Clearwater/Sand Key Bridge)
and south (from the southern Pinellas Beaches). Tourists
have utilized the existing facility as a vacation resort and
a variety of private, public, and semi-public organizations
have utilized the hotel convention and conference center
facilities since 1975.
The existing and proposed land uses are consistent with the
City of Clearwater's adopted comprehensive plan and zoning
regulations as well as the established character of develop-
ment along the barrier islands. The City's Comprehensive
Land Use Plan designates the site as "Commercial Tourist
Facility." Adjacent existing uses include a vacant parcel
and high density residential to the south, the existing
Sheraton Sand Key Resort to the north, and vacant
underdeveloped lands to the east along Clearwater Harbor, and
the Gulf of Mexico to the west.
The site of the proposed Sheraton Sand Key Resort expansion
was the subject of recent litigation ~ereby ownership of
accreted lands was established by a decision of the Florida
Supreme Court. The Florida Supreme Court held that the
owner of the upland property owns all of the accreted lands
adjacent to its property. Therefore, the development
proposal for the expansion utilizes densities available
through accreted lands adjacent to the existing resort site
and the proposed expansion site.
The Resort expansion is proposed to be developed over a
10-year build out period. Initial development activity will
include the construction of a 428 suite tower and associated
amenities followed by the renovation of the existing Sheraton
Sand Key facilities. The second tower will be initiated
after the completion of the first tower and the renovation of
the existing hotel. The second tower shall include 322 hotel
units or an equivalent number of residential units as
measured by Traffic Impact.
Wade-Trim
12-2
II
I
I-
I
I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
:1.."'11II.
"~'l I" '1
[,=,= ]
.. ..r.,.'" ..
II~..
(SSKI-3)
With regard to environmental constraints and land use
considerations, the proposed resort expansion is essentially
a continuation of existing land uses. The beach front will be
the focus of a sea oat re-vegetation program which will
include a sand dune system and pedestrian walkway for beach
access. Specifically, the proposed expansion is consistent
with the following elements:
- Comprehensive Plan.
- Adjacent land use and zoning.
- Access and traffic/parking capabilities.
- Sewer, water and utility provisions.
- Hurricane evacuation and protection can be effectively
implemented.
- No cultural, archaeological or historic resources will be
impacted.
Wade-Trim
12-3
II ,
I
I.
I
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
00.
~
u
~
'~
o
00.
~
~
~
<
~
~
~
<
z
~
z
<
~
z
~
~
z
o
~
~
;>
z
~
II
I
I
,I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
l!I~~"
r~'II~~
[==] ,
a. "'..,"'..
.~IlIIIl.
13. ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES: AIR
A. ESTIMATE AVERAGE DAILY EMISSIONS IN POUNDS PER DAY BY TYPE AND
SOURCE.
Air pollutant emissions associated with the proposed project
are anticipated to be transportation generated pollutants
resulting from the increase in vehicular traffic. Air quality
modeling will be conducted as requested by FDER and Pinellas
County. The modeling will be undertaken following completion
and finalization of traffic studies and will be submitted for
review during sufficiency. The air quality modeling will be
conducted using approved EPA models and in accordance with FDER
and Pinellas County specifications.
B. WILL A COMPLEX SOURCE PERMIT BE REQUIRED PURSUANT TO
CHAPTER 17-2.04, RULES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL
REGULATION?
The requirement for a complex source permit was repealed on
August 16, 1981.
C. WHAT STEPS WILL BE TAKEN TO REDUCE EMISSIONS AND TO MINIMIZE
ADVERSE EFFECTS?
Minimal air emissions will be generated by construction
activities. These emissions will result from fugitive dusts,
wind erosion and construction equipment exhaust. There will be
minor clearing of vegetative material and consequently little
or no burning of cleared vegetation. Appropriate watering
procedures will be employed to control fugitive dusts.
If significant transportation related air quality impacts are
identified by the air quality modeling, mitigative measures
will be addressed in sufficiency.
SSKI-28
13-1
Wade-Tnm
I'
I
I.
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I,
12..""....
't/~"I~.,'1
[=, = 1
~ "11.,,"'''
:J~...
14. ENVIRONMENTAL AND NATURAl RESOURCES: LAND
A. PROVIDE A DESCRIPTION OF EACH OF THE SOILS INDICATED ON MAP E.
A. (1) EXPAND THE SOIL DESCRIPTION AND INTERPRETATION TABLE TO
INCLUDE THE DEGREE AND KIND OF SOIL LIMITATIONS FOR AlL
PROPOSED USES. REFER TO THE FLORIDA GENERAL SOILS ATlAS
FOR REGIONAL PLANNING DISTRICTS VII AND VIII.
The most recent soil survey of Pinellas County was
published in 1972 by the USDA Soil Conservation Service.
As presented in Map E, soils present on the project site
include coastal beaches and made land.
Coastal beaches consist of narrow strips of tide-washed
sand bordering islands and parts of the mainland. The
beach sand is light gray to white consisting primarily of
fine quartz particles with varying quantities of medium to
coarse shell fragments. The beach sands have been
deposited and reworked by waves. The depth to the water
table for this soil type is tidally influenced and
consequently fluctuates with the tide. Permeability is
very rapid (>20 in/hr) and the available water capacity is
low (<0.05 in/in of soil). Soil limitations for most
types of development are severe for this association due
to tidal flOOding.
Made land consists of mixed sand, clay, hard rock, shells
and shell fragments that have been transported and
mechanically leveled and reworked to provide locations for
development. Made land may be underlain at a depth of 2
to 8 ft. by various materials such as sandy bay bottom,
solid rubble, chunks of concrete or broken asphalt.
Limitations to development are not designated due to
varying properties of the soil materials.
As referenced in Section 12C approximately 8 acres of
coastal beach has accreted onto the Sheraton Beach.
Historical surveys of the mean high water line (mhwl)
conducted by George F. Young and Associates at the
Sheraton beach indicate the mhwl has moved waterward
approximately 606 ft. during the period 12-27-72 to
9-19-87. Within the last four years (surveys dated
9-13-83 and 9-19-87), the beach has advanced approximately
175'. Exhibit 14-1 illustrates the advancement of the
mhwl over the past 15 years. Due to the present and
ongoing beach dynamics, it is anticipated the beach will
continue to advance in this area.
14-1
Wade.Trim
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
;JI"""~.
"'~"I~'I
[ ==]
.. ...r.,.~ ..
;I.......
B. WHERE THE DEGREE OF LIMITATIONS ARE VERY SEVERE, SEVERE OR
MODERATE FOR A PARTICULAR SOIL, DISCUSS HOW EACH OF THESE
LIMITATIONS WILL BE OVERCOME, AND WHAT SITE ALTERATIONS WILL
BE NECESSARY BOTH FOR THE PRESENT DEVELOPER AND ANY SUBSEQUENT
DEVELOPERS OR OWNERS.
The made land and coastal beach sediments underlying the
expansion area present no unusual limitations for development.
Standard engineering practices and foundation preparation
procedures will be successfully utilized on the expansion site
as they have on adjacent development sites.
C. IS THE DEVELOPMENT LOCATED IN AN AREA OF KNOWN MINERAL
DEPOSITS? IF SO. SPECIFY. WILL EXTRACTION OF ANY MINERAl
RESOURCES OCCUR ON-SITE, EVEN THOUGH ANCILLARY TO THE
OPERATION OF THE PROJECT?
There are no commercially viable mineral deposits or resources
on the site.
D. WHAT STEPS WILL BE TAKEN DURING CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE
AT FULL DEVELOPMENT TO PREVENT OR CONTROL WIND AND WATER SOIL
EROSION? INCLUDE A DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PLANS FOR CLEARING
AND GRADING AS RELATED TO EROSION CONTROL.
No significant clearing or grading of soils is proposed.
Furthermore, due to the rapid permeability rate of the soils
water erosion will not present a problem. Wind erosion
control will be accomplished through watering of the soils and
sodding if necessary.
E. DESCRIBE ANY UNIQUE GEOLOGIC FEATURES OF THE SITE. AND DISCUSS
WHAT ASPECTS OF THE SITE PLAN WILL BE USED TO COMPENSATE FOR
OR TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THEM.
No unique geologic features are present on the site.
SSKl-32
14-2
Wade-Tnm
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
..,."...
r~" 1-. 't
[=,= ]
.. ",.,.'" ..
.~....
15. ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES: WATER
A. DESCRIBE THE EXISTING HYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS (GROUND AND SURFACE
WATER) ON AND ABUTTING THE SITE, INCLUDING IDENTIFICATION AND
DISCUSSION OF ANY POTENTIAL AQUIFER RECHARGE AREAS.
Groundwater
Groundwater levels at the project site are influenced by tidal
action in the Gulf of Mexico. Elevations of the surficial
aquifer fluctuate regularly with periodic inundation. Because
the site is located on a barrier island abutting the Gulf, both
the surficial and the confined Floridan Aquifer contain high
concentrations of chlorides and other dissolved solids (>1000
mg/l chlorides; >180 mg/l total hardness; >180 mg/l noncarbon-
ate hardness; >250 mg/l sulfate). The Floridan Aquifer is
located at approximately 100 ft. below mean sea level in this
area. No recharge to the Floridan Aquifer occurs in this
portion of Pinellas County (Fernald and Patton, 1984).
Surface Water
Sand Key is bordered by the Gulf on it's western perimeter and
Clearwater Harbor on it's eastern perimeter. All Pinellas
County surface waters have been designated Outstanding Florida
Waters. Additionally, these two water bodies are classified as
Class III waters designated for recreation and fish and
wildlife propagation (Chapter 17-3 F.A.C.). The project site
is adjacent to the Gulf, however, the Gulf waters will not be
impacted by the project as impervious surface will not be
closer than 400 ft. from the existing mean high water line, and
there will be no discharges to the Gulf. All stormwater will
be treated pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 400-4,
F.A.C.
B. DESCRIBE IN TERMS OF APPROPRIATE WATER QUALITY PARAMETERS THE
EXISTING GROUND AND SURFACE WATER QUALITY CONDITIONS ON AND
ABUTTING THE SITE WHICH WILL BE INFLUENCED BY THIS DEVELOPMENT.
Groundwater Quality
As previously stated, groundwater in the project area is very
high in chlorides and dissolved solids due to the influence of
saline Gulf waters. In this portion of Pinellas County no
potable water is contained in the Floridan Aquifer.
Surface Water Quality
The most recent study of water quality conditions in this area
was conducted by the FDER Bureau of Water Quality .Management to
aid in the development of Water Quality Based Effluent Limita-
tions (WQBELs) for area wastewater effluent dischargers. The
15-1
, Wade-Trim
II
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
;II~""~.
"6.~' 1.. "
t =, ;]
..~,.;. .a1
II...
findings of this study are detailed in the Clearwater Harbor/
St. Joseph Sound Intensive Survey Documentation (Water Quality
Technical Series Volume 1, Number 89, April 1987). Data
obtained from this study for two monitoring stations is
included in Appendix A. Data from these stations represent the
most recent water quality data available for the Gulf and
Clearwater Harbor.
c. DESCRIBE THE WATER QUALITY MONITORING PROGRAM THAT WILL BE
UTILIZED TO MONITOR CHANGES IN THE QUALITY OF GROUND AND
SURFACE WATER ANTICIPATED TO BE BROUGHT ABOUT AS A RESULT OF
THE DEVELOPMENT ON AND ABUTTING THE SITE.
Currently, no federal, state or local agency monitors water
quality in the Gulf on a regular basis. A monitoring program
is not proposed as there will be no impacts to water quality.
D. DESCRIBE THE MEASURES WHICH WILL BE USED TO MITIGATE (OR AVOID
WHERE POSSIBLE) POTENTIAL ADVERSE EFFECT ON GROUND AND SURFACE
WATER QUALITY.
As previously stated no impacts to surface or groundwater
quality is anticipated. All new impervious surfaces will
comply with the stormwater management requirements of Chapter
400(4) and 17-25, F.A.C., as discussed in Question 22.
SSK1-6
15-2
Wade.Trlm
I.
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
..~""~.
r~'ll-"'"
[_, -1
~...r.,~..t
......
16. ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES: WETLANDS
A. HOW MANY ACRES OF WETLANDS ARE FOUND ON THE SITE? FOR THESE
PURPOSES, WETLANDS ARE DESCRIBED AS AREAS WHICH ARE SUBJECTED
TO PERMANENT OR PROLONGED PERIODS OF INUNDATION OR SATURATION
(WATER IS AT THE SOIL SURFACE AT LEAST TWO TO SEVEN MONTHS.
SEVEN OUT OF TEN YEARS), AND/OR WHICH EXHIBIT VEGETATIVE
COMMUNITIES AND/OR SOIL TYPES CHARACTERISTIC OF THIS
HYDROPERIOD.
B. WHAT ALTERATIONS OR DISTURBANCES TO WETLANDS ARE PROPOSED?
C. WHAT WETLAND AREAS WILL BE PRESERVED IN THEIR NATURAL OR
EXISTING STATE? DESCRIBE THE PLANNING APPROACH THAT WILL BE
UTILIZED TO ACCOMPLISH THIS PRESERVATION.
As approved at the October 26, 1987 TBRPC Pre-Application
Conference, no response to Question 16 is required.
SSKl-7
16-1
Wade-Trim
, I'
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
lJ~""1IlII.
"~"Ill.'
[- = ~
a. ",.. '" ..I
ill........
17. ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES: FLOOD PLAINS
A. IS ANY DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED WITHIN THE 100 YEAR FLOOD PRONE
AREA AS IDENTIFIED BY THE FEDERAL INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION? IF
SO, INDICATE WHETHER ALL FLOOR ELEVATIONS WIll BE ABOVE THE
IOO-YEAR FLOOD PRONE LEVEL. AND DISCUSS METHODS WHICH WILL BE
USED TO COMPENSATE FOR THE POTENTIAL FLOOD HAZARDS.
WHAT IS THE DEVELOPER'S SOURCE AND METHODOLOGY USED TO DERIVE
FLOOD PRONE AREA INFORMATION? HAS THE DEVELOPER SOUGHT THE
BEST AVAILABLE INFORMATION FROM COUNTIES. CITIES. WATER
MANAGEMENT DISTRICTS, ETC. (IN ADDITION TO, OR IN lIEU OF, THE
FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY DATA), RELATIVE TO FLOOD
PRONE AREAS.
Areas subject to the 100-year flood have been determined for
Sand Key by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).
The project site is located within zones All and V14 of the
100-year flood. Zone All includes areas of the 100-year flood
with base flood elevations and flood hazard factors determined.
Base flood elevations (bfe) of 11 ft. and 12 ft. have been
determined for the Sheraton area. Zone V14 is an area of the
100-year coastal flood with velocity (wave action). Base flood
elevations varying from 12 ft. - 15 ft. have been determined
for these V-zones. FEMA Flood Rate Insurance Map Community
Panel 12509 60014 B illustrates the 100-year flood zone of the
project area. These zones are depicted on Map C.
Due to the unique nature of the site in that more than 8 acres
of beach has accreted adjacent to the existing Sheraton
property since 1972, the expansion project proposes to
construct a portion of the first tower 105 ft. seaward of the
existing coastal construction control line (CCCL). The CCCL is
scheduled to be re-established in this area in 1988. Hpwever,
currently a permit must be issued by the FDNR for any
construction seaward of the existing CCCL.
To compensate for potential flood hazards all FEMA and City of
Clearwater engineering and construction specifications relevant
to construction in the 100-year flood zone will be adhered to.
All permanent structures will be constructed above the
designated base food elevation. As proposed there will be
approximately 550 ft. of beach between the mean high water
line and the nearest structure. Within this beach area the
natural dune system will be recreated. This dune system in
conjunction with the wide beach will aid in protecting
structures from storm surge.
The Southwest Florida Water Management District and the U.S.
Geol ogi cal Survey were contacted concerni ng relev4nt flood
elevation data. These agencies confirmed the FEMA information
as the best available information.
17-1
Wade-Trim
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
."""lI!.
"~" I~ 'J
[_,= J
~ ....,..."'.11
iII~".
SSKl-8
Wade.Trim
B. DOES THE LOCAL JURISDICTION IN WHICH THIS DEVELOPMENT IS
PROPOSED QUALIFY FOR FEDERAL FLOOD INSURANCE? IF SO, ATTACH A
LETTER OF VERIFICATION FROM THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT.
The City of Clearwater participates in the National Flood
Insurance Program. Included as Exhibit 17-1 is a letter of
verification from the Chief of Permitting for the City of
Cl ea rwater.
17-2
I'
I
I,
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
IIPl"'",,,-
i"~\~lOF'II~--~
I'.I...'~~~
~~ ,..~
~c..i d I ~ ~
~ ,,"' _..f ~
~C""J _~-:'. !l(~
~!::. ~,C,C7. '0:' ~~
\-r.;,;. -~-,_ ~ \
....,~ -._- ~\\
~r?U::--- "C:S II
~ 7J'T ft ~""III
":..~..t: E 1\./111'
"""",'11
C IT Y
OF
CLEARWATER
POST OFFICE BOX 4748
C LEA R W ATE R . F LOR I D A 33518 - 4748
Office of
Building Director
November 9, 1987
Ms. Tammy S. Lyons
Environmental Scientist
Wade-Trim
201 E. Kennedy Boulevard, Suite 334
Tampa, Florida 33602
Dear Ms. Lyons:
The City of Clearwater is a participant in the Federal Flood
Insurance Program. We have adopted the latest Federal Emergency
Management Agency's regulations, with amendments, Chapter 146
City Code and Ordinances. The City is also enforcing Section
390l~ The Coastal Construction Code, for the barrier islands of
Pinellas County.
If I can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to
contact me.
.
Victor C. Chodora,
Chief of Permits
VCC:mmt
EXHIBIT 17-1
17-3
"Equal Employment and Affirmative Action Employer"
r
I
I
I
I
i I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I,
I
-,
I
I
I
!II""""'.
rr .a:~l I~ 11
[= = 1
IL ~r...""J1
iI......
18. ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES: VEGETATION AND WILDLIFE
A. IDENTIFY THE DOMINANT SPECIES AND OTHER UNUSUAL OR UNIQUE
FEATURES OF THE VEGETATION ASSOCIATIONS DELINEATED ON MAP F,
AND SPECIFY THEIR ECOLOGICAL FUNCTION, HEALTH, AND CONDITIONS.
The project site consists of disturbed coastal strand uplands.
Remnants of a secondary dune system are evident along the
seaward fringe of the site. The dominant plant species found
on the site include the following:
Sc i ent ifi c Name
Common Name
Uniola paniculata
Ipomoea macrantha
thomoea pes-caprae
ama e s yc e .!E.E....!..
Paspalum distTChum
Croton punctatus
sea oats
beach morning glory
ra i 1 road vi ne
sound dune spurge
seashore paspalum
beach tea
B. ARE ANY RARE OR ENDANGERED PLANTS FOUND ON THE SITE? IF SO,
WHAT MEASURES WILL BE TAKEN TO PROTECT THESE SPECIES?
No rare or endangered plants are found on the site. All plant
species present are common dune pioneer species common to this
locale and habitat.
C. WHAT WILDLIFE (INCLUDING AQUATIC LIFE) NEST, FEED, RESIDE ON OR
MI~ATE TO THE SITE? WHAT MEASURES WILL BE TAKEN TO PROTECT
THIS WILDLIFE AND THEIR HABITATS?
The most notable wildlife species nesting in the coastal strand
is the loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta). This species
is discussed in detail below.
Other species observed to be residing on the more landward
vegetated portions of the site include mourning doves
(Zenaidura macroura) and small rodents (Peromyscus ~.).
These species are considered to be facultative transients on
this site.
The unvegetated portions of the site could potentially provide
nesting habitat for many species of shorebirds
(charadriiformes), including black skimmers (R~nchops nig~r)
and least terns (Sterna albifrons), however, hlgh pedestrlan
traffic from surrounding land uses significantly reduces the
probability of use for nesting by these species.
18-1
Wade.Trim
r
.1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.~""~.
., ..~' Ia.. ,
[= =]
.. ""..,"''''
u._~.
D. ARE ANY OF THE WILDLIFE LISTED UNDER (C) ABOVE CONSIDERED
ENDANGERED OR THREATENED SPECIES? IF SO, PROVIDE A DETAILED
STATEMENT ON WHAT STEPS WILL BE TAKEN TO PROTECT THEM AND THEIR
BREEDING, NESTING, AND FEEDING AREAS.
The loggerhead turtle (Caretta caretta) is listed as threatened
by the Florida Game and Freshwater Fish Commission and the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service. The U.S. loggerhead population is
estimated at 25,000-50,000 with approximately 90% of the total
population represented in Florida. The majority of Florida
nesting activity occurs in the southeast portion of the state.
(Rare and Endangered Biota of Florida, FGFWFC, 1984). The
Clearwater Marine Science Center (CMSC) report 1987 Loggerhead
Sea Turtle Nesting Information indicates 15 nests and/or false
crawls were reported on Sand Key beach during the 1987 nesting
season.
Sea turtles are protected at the federal level by the
Endangered Species Act of 1973. The National Marine Fisheries
Service has jurisdiction over sea turtles in the water while
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has jurisdiction over them
on land. The Florida Department of Natural Resources in
cooperation with federal agencies administers turtle prog~ams
throughout the state. The principle threats to sea turtle
survival include the following 1) nesting beach alterations
(erosion, development where nesting would normally occur) 2)
predation by domestic and feral animals, and 3) disorientation
of hatchlings by artificial lighting resulting in hatchling
mortal ities.
As indicated in the FDNR report Florida Sea Turtle Nesting
Activity 1979-1985, measures to aid in protection of sea
turtles include the following:
o increased public education and awareness;
o regulations to control beach lighting during the nesting
season;
o elimination of heavy machinery (beach cleaning) on the beach
during the nesting season;
o better coastal planning to circumvent severe beach erosion;
and
o increased manpower to aid in predation control.
18-2
Wade-Trim
I'
,
I,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
...""....
'I fIi:~' 11il..,
t _ -]
I. ...r..;Y ..
3._....
SSKl-9
In order to avoid potential adverse impacts to sea turtles the
fOllowing measures will be incorporated into the Sheraton Sand
Key expansion:
o The Sheraton Sand Key will engage with the Clearwater Marine
Science Center or other qualified agencies or individuals to
survey the beach daily and mark with FDNR approved warning
signs any sea turtle nests found on the Sheraton beach.
This activity will begin May 1 and continue through the end
of nesting season, November 1.
o Mechanized beach cleaning will occur only after the daily
nesting surveys. Cleaning equipment will avoid identified
nests.
o Dunes will be recreated and revegetated on the existing
Sheraton property as well as the expansion property. FDNR
personnel will be consulted concerning dune re-construction.
Two dune walkovers will be incorporated into the dune
system. This measure will serve to restore the natural dune
system as well as conceal' artificial lighting visible from
the beach.
o Dune walkover lighting will be footlights or appropriately
shielded low frequency lighting. The site plan is being
designed to minimize light visible to hatchlings.
o Any construction requiring exterior lighting during the
nesting season (May I-November 1) will be limited to
daylight hours.
o The Sheraton currently displays and will continue to display
sea turtle educational information.
.
Wade-Tnm
18-3
I'
I
I,
I
I
I
I,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
s..""....
'~'l~'
t !il_ ]
v.. ..,.,~ .t
~.._...
19. ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES: HISTORICAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL
SITES
A. ARE THERE ANY HISTORICAL OR ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES ON THE
DEVELOPMENT SITE?
The Department of State, Division of Archives, History and
Records Management has been contacted to determine if any
archaeological and/or historical sites have been described on
the Sheraton Sand Key property. A verbal determination of the
project site from this agency states that no known sites are
recorded in the Master Site File. A letter has been received
from the Division of Archives, History and Records Management
and is enclosed as Exhibit 19-1.
B. IF ANY HISTORICAL OR ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES WERE LISTED UNDER (A)
ABOVE, PROVIDE A STATEMENT AS TO THE STEPS THAT WILL BE TAKEN
TO PROTECT THEM AND TO PROVIDE PUBLIC ACCESS, WHERE
APPROPRIATE.
If in fact archaeological resources are found during project
construction, the applicant agrees to report such findings to
determine their significance with the Division of Archives and
the City of Clearwater.
SSK1-10
19-1
Wade.Trim
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
November 9, 1987
'~~~
;"-
~~Wk,.,;fJ
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ST ATE
Jim Smith
SeCretary of State
DIVISION OF HISTORICAL HESOURCES
R.A. Gray Building
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0250
(9C1) 488-1480 In Reply Refer to:
Beth J. LaCivita
Historic Sites Specialist
(904) 487-2333
Project File No.871518
Ms. Tammy S. Lyons
Environmental Scientist
Wade-Trim
201 East Kennedy Boulevard, Suite 334
Tampa, Florida 33602
RE: Your letter of October 27, 1987, Cultural Resource Assessment Request
ADA/DRI for proposed addition to the Sheraton Sand Key Resorts, Clearwater,
Pinellas County, Florida
Dear Ms. Lyons:
In accordance with the provisions of the applicable local ordinance and/or
Sections 253.77 , 267.061 , 380.06 v: 380.061 and 403.918(2)(a)6-, Florida
Statutes, and implementing-State regUTations, ana/or in accordance W1~ the
provlslons of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (Public Law 89-665)
as amended and related federal laws and their implementing procedures for
federally involved projects ,we have reviewed the above cited project{s) to
determine its{their) effect-on significant archaeological and historical sites
and properti es.
A review of the Florida Master Site File indicates that no significant
archaeological and/or historical sites are recorded for or considered likely to
be present within the project area{s)~ Because of the project{s) nature it is
considered unlikely that any such sites will be affected . Therefore, it is the
opinion of this office that the proposed project(s) will-nave no effect on any
sites listed, or eligible for listing, in the National Register of Historic
Places, or otherwise of national, state or local slgnlflcance. The proJect(s)
ls(are) consistent also with Florida's coastal zone program and its historic
preservation laws and concerns, and may proceed without further involvement with
this agency.
If you have any questions concerning our comments, please do not hestiate to
contact us. Your interest and cooperation in helping to protect Florida's
archaeological and historical resources are appreciated.
GWP/efk
Enclosure{
Sincerely,
~""- A!9 ,~~
c....--- ..-
~ George W. Percy, Director
ti' Division of Historical Resources
and
State Historic Preservation Officer
19-2
Archaeological Research Rorida Folklife Programs Historic Preservation
(904) 487.2299 (904) 397-2192 (904) 487-2333
EXHIBIT 19-1
I'
"
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I,
I
I
I
~
~
o
z
o
u
~
I'
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
,
I
I
:'~"""'t'I
"~"1~'"
[== J
fa. "3'.,."../1
:2..-18
20. ECONOMY: EMPLOYMENT AND ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS
A. PROVIDE A PROJECTION OF THE ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION EXPENDITURES
BY DEVELOPMENT PHASE. BREAK DOWN BY TYPE (LABOR, MATERIALS,
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, ADMINISTRATIVE, OVERHEAD, ETC.) AND
ESTIMATE WHAT PERCENTAGE OF THESE EXPENDITURES WILL BE SPENT
WITHIN THE REGION. FOR LABOR, ESTIMATE THE NUMBER OF CONSTRUC-
TION EMPLOYEES DURING EACH PHASE OF THE DEVELOPMENT.
The expenditures for this project reflect information generated
by the owner/developer, local government officials, architects
and building contractors. The areas addressed in this question
are of economic nature and are general in scope. Construction
costs may vary somewhat from item to item but overall configu-
rations and bottom-line numbers are accurately portrayed for
this project. Total cost projected for this development is
$90,630,000.
Included in these assumptions and calculations are the costs of
land improvements, labor and materials, design and engineering,
environmental consulting/testing and all contingency fees.
Table 20.1 represents construction expenditures and employment
figures.
Categorical Expenditures
o Construction labor: costs incurred for contract labor,
including contractor payroll costs, overhead and profit.
o Materials: materials purchased for on-site development and
construction.
o Professional services: these include design fees for
architects, engineers, environmental testing, accounting,
legal and surveying.
o Overhead: Developer administrative and financing costs,
permit fees, equipment, etc.
Employment Generated ~ Construction Expenditures
Estimates of employment as a result of construction activity
were prepared using the labor expenditure projection in Table
20-1 as was provided by the applicant.
20-1
Wade-Trim
I'
I
I,
I
I
I
I
"
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
.....""~.
r _~'ll~ '1
[-, -
~~I.,."'J
iI......
Table 20-1. Construction Expenditures and Employment
Sheraton Sand Key Resort
TYPE OF IMPACT IMPACT-TAMPA BAY REGION
Total Amount Percentage
$ in Region in Regi on
0 Construction Expenditures
A. Labor $28,174,000 $27,387,550 95%
B. Materials 16,476,000 14,086,980 90%
C. Profess i ana 1 Services 1,850,000 925,000 50%
D. Overhead 44,130,000 44,130,000 100%
TOTAL 90,630,000 86,529,530
0 e.ployment Projections
A. Construction Employment 331 314 95%
B. Employment Income (Labor) $28,829,000 $27,387,550 95%
.
Source: Grand Couloir Corporation
20-2
Wade-Trim
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
!I....."'.
,. .,~' I" "I
[=,= ]
~ '11",'"' JI
iI._IIiM
Expenditures ~ Region
The breakdown of expenditures within the Tampa Bay region are
reflected in Table 20-1 and are calculated on the following
assumptions.
.
o Labor Expenditures (95% in Tampa Bay Region) - It is
anticipated that most or all of the labor will come from
local sources due to the fact a local contractor will be used
for construction.
o Materials (90% within Tampa Bay) - Materials purchased for
construction purposes will be made on a local level using
local contractors and laborers. There remains a possibility
that some specialized materials may come from outside the
region.
o Professional Services (50% in Tampa Bay Region) - Approxi-
mately fifty (50) percent of the professional services are
anticipated to be drawn from the Tampa Bay region.
o Overhead (100% within Tampa Bay region) - Any and all
additional elements of the project considered as overhead are
assumed to be assimilated within the immediate region.
B. FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT. PROJECT THE NUMBER OF NON-
CONSTRUCTION PERMANENT EMPLOYEES AT THE COMPLETION OF EACH
DEVELOPMENT PHASE, USING APPROPRIATE DIVISION AND TWO-DIGIT
(I.E.. MAJOR GROUP) STANDARD INDUSTRIAL ClASSIFICATIONS (E.G..
MINING--METAL MINING; RETAIL TRADE--FOOD STORES; SERVICES-
-BUSINESS SERVICES; ETC.). INCLUDE ESTIMATED PAYROLL. IF THE
NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES WILL VARY SEASONALLY. SPECIFY.
By the very nature of the hotel business, a variety of
employment opportunities will be made available upon completion
of the new facility. As projected by the developer, the
following positions will be required to staff the hotel and
support areas. Included are estimated income levels for each
group.
Seven divisions of staff have been identified by the owner and
include the executive staff, rooms department, food and
beverage, accounting sales and marketing, maintenance and pool
attendants, classified SIC code 70, Division I, Services).
20-3
Wade-Trim
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
a
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
:lI~"""1I
r~" I~ 'I
[== ]
.. -"'01,""
.._tlII.
Norma 1 Season Personnel
Under $5,000- $7,000- $10,000- $15,000- $25,000-
$5,000 6,900 9,999 14,999 24,999 over
Executive 2 2
Rooms 97 32 5 2
Food & Beverage 102 93 10 2
Accounting 3 3 3
Telephone 5
Gi ft Shop 11
Sales/ Marketing 6 10
Maintenance 23 2
Pool 6
TOTAL 199 173 26 21
C. FOR AlL TYPES OF EMPLOYMENT, PROVIDE A BREAKDOWN BY INCOME GROUP FOR
ALL CONSTRUCTION EMPLOYMENT USING THE FORMAT BELOW. FOR
NON-RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS, AlSO PROVIDE AN ADDITIONAL BREAKDOWN
BY INCOME GROUP FOR NON-CONSTRUCTION PERMANENT EMPLOYMENT USING THE
FORMAT BELOW.
Construction Personnel
Under
$5,000
$5,000- $7,000- $10,000- $15,000- $25,000-
6,900 9,999 14,999 24,999 over
22
28
35
20
20-4
HVAC Mechanics
Bricklayers/
Blocklayers
Carpenters
Cement Masons
Wade.Trim
I'
I
I,
I
I
I
,t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.JII'''''....
r~'l I~"
[ --]
.. ~;.,~ A
11._...
Construction Personnel - Continued
Under $5,000- $7,000- $10,000- $15,000- $25,000-
Electricians $5,000 6,900 9,999 14,999 24,999 over
22
El evator
Constructors 8
Gl azi ers 12
Iron\\Orkers 20
Laborers 22
Lathers 12
Pa inters 16
Plasterers 16
Pl umbers/
Pipefitters 14
Roofers 18
Sheet Metal
Workers 16
Soft Floor
layers 14
Sprinkler
Fi tters 8
Ti 1 e Setters 12
Welders 4
TOTAL -n m lb
Power Equipment Operators
Backhoe 2
Bulldozer 2
Compactor 2
Crane 2
Grader 2
Piledriver 2
TOTAL -s! 257 22
D. FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT INDICATE WHETHER NON-CONSTRUCTION
EMPLOYMENT IN THE PROJECT REQUIRES SPECIALIZED SKILLS OR TRAINING.
WILL ANY EMPLOYEES REQUIRE TRAINING IN SPECIALIZED SKILLS AT
EDUCATIONAl FACILITIES IN THE REGION? ARE SUCH TRAINING PROGRAMS
PRESENTlY AVAILABLE?
Projections for employment indicate a majority of staff positions
will be made available on the service levels which will not require
specific job training. Other specialized personnel will more than
likely be hired for related experiences and former education.
Therefore, specialized training at educational facilities in the
regi on will not be requi red.
20-5
Wade-Trim
I'
I
I,
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
:I~"'.
r b:~'1" ..
[-, -]
.. ",.,S" A
1I~__.
E. ESTIMATE WHAT PERCENTAGE OF THE NON-CONSTRUCTION, PERMANENT
EMPLOYEES WILL BE FOUND LOCALLY, AND WHAT PERCENTAGE MUST BE DRAWN
FROM OUTSIDE THE REGION. IF THESE PERCENTAGES WILL VARY THROUGHOUT
THE PROJECT LIFE, SPECIFY.
It is anticipated that virtually all non-construction, permanent
employees will be found locally.
F. WHAT WILL BE THE LOSS OF AGRICULTURE OR FORESTRY RESOURCES ON THE
SITE AS A RESULT OF THE PROPOSED PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT? REFER TO
EXISTING LAND USE (MAP D), PROPOSED MASTER PLAN (MAP H) AND RESPONSE
TO QUESTION 12B. SPECIFY LOSSES OF ACREAGE, ANNUAL CROP YIELD,
DOLLAR VALUES, ETC.
Sheraton Sand Key is primarily made from Ma (Made Land) soils and Co
(Coastal Beaches) soils that support little to no vegetation
classifications that can be associated with agricultural or forestry
resources. Due to the high percentage of development already
existing on Sand Key and the lack of significant ground cover on the
proposed site, there will be no loss of agricultural or forestry
resources due to this development.
G. IF THE DEVELOPMENT WILL CONTAIN A RESIDENTIAL ELEMENT, SPECIFY THE
PERCENTAGE OF DEMANDS FOR EMPLOYMENT, RETAIL TRADE, AND SERVICES
GENERATED BY THE RESIDENTS THAT WILL BE SATISFIED WITHIN THE PROJECT
(I.E., THROUGH THE PROVISION OF OTHER LAND USES ON THE SITE, ETC.).
The development does not contain a residential element. Any demands
for services generated by hotel guests have been planned for on-
site.
H. WILL THE PROJECT RECEIVE ASSISTANCE FROM FEDERAL, STATE OR OTHER
GOVERNMENT FUNDING PROGRAMS? IF SO, FROM WHAT AGENCY AND WHAT IS
THE AMOUNT?
.
The Sheraton Sand Key resort will not receive assistance from
federal, state or other government funding programs or agencies.
I. HAS A MARKET STUDY BEEN PREPARED FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT? IF
SO, A COPY SHOULD BE ATTACHED. IF NOT, DESCRIBE IN GENERAL TERMS
HOW THE DEMAND FOR THIS PROJECT WAS DETERMINED.
The Sheraton Sand Key has been under the same management for over 12
years and is well-attuned to the factors which influence growth in
this market. The Sheraton Sand Key management staff has years of
experience in the hotel business and has been a leader in local and
regional tourism and hotel business organizations. Sheraton Sand
Key management has recognized for sometime the demand for additional
hotel rooms in the Pinellas County beach market. This demand was
reinforc;ed by estimates from the Sheraton Reservation system and the
Sheraton Sand Key sales department that the Sheraton Sand Key Resort
turned away over 50,000 room nights in 1986 due to the lack of
20-6
Wade-Trim
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1:llP'''''lIIIIlI
:t ,"'~' ,... 'I
t ==]
"1""...~ JI
ij._lIla
available space. This statistic plus regional growth indicators
were the initial determinants of demand for expansion of the
Sheraton Sand Key resort.
Sheraton Sand Key management, in scheduling group meetings and
conferences, has identified numerous groups that have met at the
existing 390 room resort facility but required overflow to area
hotels. A conservative estimate of the number of outside rooms
required to support overflow needs in 1986-87 was 1700. In some
cases the need for additional hospitality suites, exhibit space and
dining/banquet facilities limited the ability of the resort to
adequately accommodate scheduled conferences and meetings. Further,
numerous groups which heretofore used the existing resort have grown
too large to be accommodated without the proposed expansion. The
expanding number and type of organizations using the resort include
civic, governmental, corporate, medical, educational, financial,
banking, advertising and industrial users. Without the proposed
expansion, it is likely that other resort/conference facilities
outside of the Tampa Bay region and/or State of Florida will book
these conferences and meetings.
J. PROVIDE AN ANALYSIS OF THE ESTIMATED ANNUAL AD VALOREM TAX YIELD
FROM THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT DURING EACH PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT.
INDICATE ALL ASSUMPTIONS AND STANDARDS, INCLUDING ASSESSED VALUE,
EXEMPTIONS, MILLAGE RATES, ETC.
All projections for future ad valorem tax yields have been assumed
in 1987 dollars with current millage rates at 19.975/$1000 of
taxable value. The assessed value of the Sheraton Sand Key
expansion is based on current market rates for high end hotels on
Clearwater Beach at $41,000 per unit. Therefore, an addition of 750
rooms, based on this assumption, projects the assessed value at
$30,750,000.
1986 Actual
Assessed Value: $15,668,600
City
County
Schoo 1
Special
Tota 1 1986 Taxes
69,816.15
66,716.90
117,545.84
32,683.13
$286,762.02
Taxes:
20-7
Wade-Trim
I'
I
il
I
I
I
t
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.,.""....
F AI~I I" '\I
[=; 1
.. ..,.,. ..I
.~IIIlI.
1987 Proposed
Assessed Value $16,000,500
City
School
County
Total proposed 1987 Taxes:
Taxes:
80,002.50
117,395.67
122,675.84
$320,074.01
Proposed Expansion1
Assessed Value2 $30,750,000
City
School
County
Total projected taxes:
Taxes:
147,600
227,550
239,850
$615,000
Anticipated additional revenues will be generated by the expansion
in the form of increased vehicular traffic using the Sand Key
Bridge. Additional toll monies, calculated on 354 new peak hour
trips X 15 X $.50 average toll X 365 days, will result in
$969,075.00 in gross revenues to the City of Clearwater.
~ Assessed value in 1987 dollars
Pinellas County Property Appraiser and Tax Assessor
K. ESTIMATE THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT COSTS THAT WILL BE BORNE BY THE
lOCAL GOVERNMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF ALL PUBLIC FACILITIES AND
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS NOT PROVIDED BY THE DEVELOPER.
It is anticipated that no capi~al improvements and associated
costs will be borne by either the City of Clearwater or
Pinellas County due to this project.
SSK1-11
20-8
Wade-Tnm
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
00
~
~
~
~
~
~
u
<
~
u
~
~
==
~
~ .
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i'J~"''''.
r~~\1
["i~'
~ ""..,"''''
.....
21. PUBLIC FACILITIES: WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT
A. PROJECT AVERAGE DAILY FLOW IN MGD OF WASTEWATER GENERATED BY
THE DEVELOPMENT AT THE END OF EACH PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT. IF
APPLICABLE, PROVIDE A TABLE DESCRIBING THE VOLUME AND
CHARACTERISTICS OF ANY INDUSTRIAL OR OTHER EFFLUENTS.
As approved by the TBRPC Clearinghouse Review Committee at the
October 26, 1987 Preapplication Conference, correspondence by
the applicant outlining project demand was forwarded to the
City of Clearwater requesting confirmation of service capacity
and/or ability. Please refer to Exhibit 2Jl-1 and supplemental
information requests.
B. WILL ON-SITE TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL BE PRO'iIDED? IF SO,
PROVIDE A DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED SYSTIEM, INCLUDING THE
METHOD AND DEGREE OF TREATMENT AND THE QU~LITY OF EFFLUENT.
ALSO SPECIFY THE EXPECTED LIFE OF THE FACILITY. TO WHAT EXTENT
WILL THIS FACILITY BE CAPABLE OF MEETING THE DEMANDS GENERATED
BY THE PROJECT FOR ALL PHASES OF DEVELOPMENT? WHO WILL
OPERATE AND MAINTAIN THE INTERNAl COLLECTION AND TREATMENT
FACILITIES? SPECIFY RECEIVING BODIES OR OTHER MEANS OF
EFFLUENT DISPOSAl. IF SPRAY IRRIGATION WILL BE USED, SPECIFY
LOCATION AND APPROXIMATE AREA OF SPRAY FIElDS, CURRENT WATER
TABLE CONDITIONS, PROPOSED RATE OF APPLIC~~ION AND BACK-UP
SYSTEM CAPACITY. INDICATE THE VOLUME OF SLUDGE AND THE
PROPOSED METHODS FOR ITS TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL.
TAMPA BAY REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
B. (1) DESCRIBE METHODS FOR MONITORING THE I)OTENTIAL FOR SURFACE
AND/OR GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION TO ~~E RECEIVING BODIES
SPECIFIED IN QUESTION 21.B.
B. (2) HOW DOES THIS TREATMENT FACILITY RELATE TO REGIONAL
FACILITIES PLANNING AND WHAT IS THE EXPECTED PHASE OUT DATE
IF AVAILABLE?
B. (3) IF SPRAY IRRIGATION WILL BE USED, SPECIFY THE MAXIMUM WATER
TABLE CONDITIONS DURING WET SEASON 1"1 THE AREA OF THE SPRAY
FIELDS.
See 21.A above.
C. IF SEPTIC TANKS WILL BE USED ON SITE, IN[)ICATE THE NUMBER OF
UNITS TO BE SERVED, GENERAL LOCATIONS, AltO ANY PlANS FOR
EVENTUAL PHASE-OUT.
21-1
Wade.Trim
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
:1
I
.~""IIlI.
"~"J~'"
[-, ;]
.. ~r. >...
.......
TAMPA BAY REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
C. (1) PROVIDE THE CURRENT AND MAXIMUM WET SEJISON WATER TABLE
CONDITIONS AND PERCOLATION RATES IN THE GENERAL LOCATION OF
THE PROPOSED SEPTIC TANKS.
C. (2) PROVIDE INFORMATION DESCRIBING THE POTENTIAl FOR SINKHOLES
IN OR ADJACENT TO ANY PROPOSED SEPTIC TANKS AND/OR SPRAY
IRRIGATION SYSTEMS.
See 21.A above.
D. IF OFF-SITE WASTEWATER TREATMENT IS PLANNEn, ATTACH A LETTER
FROM THE AGENCY OR FIRM PROVIDING TREATMENT OUTlINING:
(1) THE PRESENT AND PROJECTED EXCESS CAPA(:ITY OF THE TREATMENT
AND TRANSMISSION FACILITIES TO WHICH CONNECTION WILL BE
MADE AT PRESENT AND FOR EACH PHASE llItOUGH COMPLETION OF
THE PROJECT,
(2) ANY OTHER COMMITMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN ttADE F~ THIS EXCESS
CAPAC ITY, AND
(3) A STATEMENT OF ABILITY TO PROVIDE SER"ICE AT ALL TIMES
DURING ~ AFTER DEVELOPMENT. (THE AGENCY MUST BE SUPPLIED
WITH THE SEWAGE GENERATION INFORMATlOfI IN (A) ABOVE.)
(4) HOW DOES THIS TREATMENT FACILITY RELATE TO REGIONAl
FACILITIES PLANNING?
See 21.A above.
SSKl-12
21-2
Wade.Trim
, I'
I
I,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1I"~.
J'~" I~"
[_,= 1
... ..r.,," ...
.~tlII.
SSK2:12(5)
21-3
Wade-Trim
I' ,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
....~....
IF~~~ I~~
r:~~J
lli~JJ
.~-~II
Group
Services:
Engineering
Planning
Sciences
Landscape
Architecture
Wade-Trim
November 9, 1987
Mr. William C. Baker, P.E.,
Director of Public Works
City of Clearwater
112 S. Osceola Avenue
Post Office Box 4748
Clearwater, Florida 33518
Re: Determination of Wastewater Services for Sheraton Sand Key
Resort Expansion
Clearwater, Florida
Dear Mr. Baker:
Wade-Trim, Inc. (WTI) is preparing the Developmen1~ of Regional Impact/
Appl ication for Development Approval (DRI/ADA) fOI'" the Sheraton Sand
Key Resort Expansion.
The Sheraton Sand Key Resort is located in Section 17, Township 29S,
Range 15E in the City of Clearwater. The resort site lies immediately
south of the Pinellas County Sand Key Park fronting on the west side
Gulf Boulevard. A general location map is included as Map A.
The proposed expansion of the existing 390-room rE!Sort is the addition
of approximately 750 rooms and associated amenitiE!S including
conference rooms, retail space, restaurants, health club and spa,
pool, lounges and housekeeping area.
Wade-Trim, Inc. estimates the ultimate development: wHl generate
114,356 gallons per day of domestic wastewater. Table 21-1 represents
average daily wastewater flow.
Pursuant to the requirements of the DRI/ADA, please indicate the
abil ity of the City of Clearwater Util ities to pro,vide wastewater
services for the proposed development of Sheraton Sand Key Resort
Expansion.
Due to the time constraints, we would appreciate an expeditious reply.
Should you have any questions concerning the project, please call me
at (813) 221-2090 in Tampa.
Very truly yours,
WADE-TRIM
IhU If ~i
Hung T. Mai,
P.E.
HTM:ps
SSK2: 12(1 )
ZZZ2067-01
Enc1 osures
EXHIBIT 21-1
21-4
Wade-Trim,lnc,
Member olltie Wade-Trim Group
201 E, Kennedy Boulevard . Suite 334 . Tampa, Florida 33602
813-221-2090 . telt~co~ier: 813-229-0974
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
1Il~"""'.
.,.",~ll~'"
t ==1
~ "".,," ..
..~...
22. PUBLIC FACILITIES: DRAINAGE
A. DESCRIBE THE VARIOUS ELEMENTS OF THE PROPOSED DRAINAGE SYSTEM
SHOWN ON MAP G AND DISCUSS THE DESIGN CAPACITY CRITERIA TO BE
USED FOR THE VARIOUS ELEMENTS. INCLUDE INFOJ~MATION AS TO WHAT
DESIGN STORM (E.G. 10 YEAR-24 HOUR. ETC.) WII.L BE USED FOR WHAT
PORTIONS OF THE SYSTEM.
Existing Drainage System
The proposed project site is presently vacant land with very
good percolation due to sandy soil conditions. The existing
topography falls from a southeast to northwest direction which
is from Gulf Blvd. to the ocean. At the present time there is
no existing drainage system and stormwater runoff is percolated
into the ground.
Proposed Drainage System
The proposed drainage system will be designed to serve the
planned expansion of the hotel facilities.
The detention area will be designed to contain the runoff from
25-year, 24-hour storm event for post-development conditions
while limiting peak discharge rates to the 25-year event under
existing conditions. This pond will also be designed to treat
the first 1/2 inch of runoff from the respective tributary
area. Treatment will be provided by percolation. Detention
areas will be incorporated into the dune system and be designed
to control the rate of outflow and impound specified volumes of
stormwater for treatment and storage to meet Chapter 400-4 and
17-25 F.A.C. All inflow and outflow structures will be
designed to prevent erosion, scour and washouts.
B. FROM MAP G, INDICATE THE TOTAL NUMBER OF ACRE.S IN EACH DRAINAGE
AREA, AND SPECIFY THE ACREAGE OF ANY PORTIONS OF DRAINAGE AREAS
OUTSIDE THE SITE BOUNDARIES. INDICATE THE TO'rAL ACRES AND
STORAGE CAPACITY OF PROPOSED RETENTION AREAS. AND THE TOTAL
ACRES OF PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS SURFACES.
Table 22-1
Basin Area I.pervious Detention Storage Water Ua~i~Y Required Design
(If:} Area (AC.) Volume (Ac.-Ft.) reatmen1: 0 ume Volume Volume
(Ac.-Ft.) (Ac.-Ft.) (Ac.-Ft.)
I 12.00 6.76 0.94 0.31 1.25 1.40
22-1
Wade-Trim
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.1
I
I
I
I
I
.~.
r ...~,I I~"
[""- ]
.. ~r.,~ ...
........
C. SPECIFY AND COMPARE THE VOLUME AND QUALITY OF RUNOFF FROM THE
SITE IN ITS EXISTING CONDITION TO THE ANTICIPATED RUNOFF AT THE
END OF EACH PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT. INDICATE WHAT PROVISIONS
WILL BE INCORPORATED IN THE DESIGN OF THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO
MINIMIZE ANY INCREASE IN RUNOFF FROM THE SITE AND TO MINIMIZE
ANY DEGRADATION OF WATER QUALITY IN THE ULTIMATE RECEIVING BODY
OVER THAT OCCURRING IN ITS PRE-DEVELOPMENT STATE. INDICATE THE
MAJOR POINTS OF DISCHARGE FOR STORM WATER.
As presented in Table 22-1, total storage required to maintain
the pre-developed site discharge rate is 0.94 acre-feet. Total
amount of storage necessary to meet water quality treatment
requirements of the Stormwater Rule (Chapter 17-25), Florida
Administrative Code is 0.31 acre-feet. This results in a total
on-site storage volume requirement of 1.25 acre-feet. The
detention ponds proposed for the site will retain and treat the
first 1/2 inch of runoff from the areas tributary to respective
pond. The retained volumes of stormwater runoff will be
treated within detention area. This system will be designed
with sufficient capacity to treat discharge the required
storage within a maximum retention time of 72 hours as set
forth in Chapter 17-25 F.A.C.
D. WHO WILL OPERATE AND MAINTAIN THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM AFTER
COMPLETION OF THE DEVELOPMENT?
All on-site systems, structures, and detention areas will be
maintained by the Owner.
SSKl-13
22-2
Wade-Trim
I'
I
I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
s~....
r~"I"'~
[- -1
J.;jIji,,~'"
.......
23. PUBLIC FACILITIES: WATER SUPPLY
A. PROVIDE A PROJECTION OF THE AVERAGE DAILY POTABLE AND NON-
POTABLE WATER DEMANDS AT THE END OF EACH PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT.
IF SIGNIFICANT SEASONAL DEMAND VARIATIONS WILL OCCUR, DISCUSS
ANTICIPATED PEAKS AND DURATION.
A. (1) DESCRIBE HOW THE DEMAND INFORMATION FOR QUESTION 23.A WAS
GENERATED.
As approved by the TBRPC Clearinghouse Review Committee at
the October 26, 1987 Preapplication Conference, corres-
pondence by the applicant outlining project demand was
forwarded to the City of Clearwater requesting confirma-
tion of service capacity and/or ability. Please refer to
Exhibit 23-1 and Table 23-1.
B. PROVIDE A BREAKDOWN OF SOURCES OF WATER SUPPLY. BOTH POTABLE
AND NON-POTABLE. BY DEVELOPMENT PHASE THROUGH PROJECT
COMPLETION. USE THE FORMAT BELOW AND PROVIDE A SEPARATE TABLE
FOR EACH.
See 23.A above.
C. IF WATER WELLS EXIST ON-SITE. LOCATE THEM ON MAP H AND SPECIFY
THOSE THAT WILL CONTINUE TO BE USED. ALSO LOCATE ON MAP H ALL
PROPOSED ON-SITE WELLS. EXCEPT THAT FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOP-
MENTS, IF INDIVIDUAL WELLS FOR EACH LOT ARE PROPOSED. INDICATE
THE NUMBER OF UNITS TO BE SERVED. GENERAL LOCATIONS. AND ANY
PLANS FOR EVENTUAL PHASE-OUT. INDICATE THE DIAMETER. DEPTH.
AND PUMPING RATES (AVERAGE AND MAXIMUM) FOR EACH OF THE
EXISTING WELLS AND PROJECT THIS INFORMATION FOR THE PROPOSED
WELLS (FOR LOTS SERVED BY INDIVIDUAL WELLS. THIS INFORMATION
MAY BE GROUPED FOR PROJECTION PURPOSES). ALSO PROVIDE A
BREAKDOWN OF THE WELLS WITH REGARD TO POTABLE AND NON-POTABLE
SOURCES.
See 23.A above.
D. WHO WILL OPERATE AND MAINTAIN THE INTERNAL WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM
AFTER COMPLETION OF THE DEVELOPMENT?
See 23.A above.
E. IF AN OFF-SITE WATER SUPPLY IS PLANNED. ATTACH A LETTER FROM
THE AGENCY OR FIRM PROVIDING SERVICE OUTLINING:
(1) THE PROJECTED EXCESS CAPACITIES OF THE WATER SUPPLY
FACILITIES TO WHICH CONNECTION WILL BE MADE AT PRESENT AND
FOR EACH PHASE THROUGH COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT.
23-1
Wade-Trim
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~~"""".
r~"I~'!I
[- =]
... ..,.., '" ..
.a.-i.
(2) ANY OTHER COMMITMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN MADE FOR THIS EXCESS
CAPACITY,
(3) A STATEMENT OF THE AGENCY OR FIRM'S ABILITY TO PROVIDE
SERVICE AT ALL TIMES DURING AND AFTER DEVELOPMENT. (THE
AGENCY MUST BE SUPPLIED WITH THE WATER DEMAND AND SUPPLY
TABLES IN PARAGRAPHS A AND B ABOVE).
See 23.A above.
F. WHAT STEPS WILL BE TAKEN TO INSURE THAT WATER PRESSURE AND
FLOW WILL BE ADEQUATE FOR FIRE PROTECTION FOR THE TYPE OF
CONSTRUCTION PROPOSED?
See 23.A above.
SSKl-14
23-2
Wade-Trim
I'
I
I
I
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.~""....
r"'~'I!Ilo."
[- -]
~~r.~...
.._lIIIII.
SECOND BUILDING
Hotel Suite
322 rooms
(a) Source: Wade-Trim, Inc., 1987
(b) Assumed to be 100% occupied
SSK2:12(6)
23-3
120 gpd/room
Subtota 1
Total
38,640
38,640
129,737 GPO
Wade.Trlm
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.lIIa....
It'~~~ I~"
r~J
~~P.)~~JI
...~....
Group
Services:
Engineering
P"lanning
Sciences
Landscape
Architecture
Wade-Trim
November 9, 1987
Mr. Cecil Henderson
Utilities Director
City of Clearwater
112 S. Osceola Avenue
Post Office Box 4749
Clearwater, Florida 33518
Re: Determination of Potable Water Supply for Sheraton Sand
Key Resort Expansion
Clearwater, Florida
Dear Mr. Henderson:
Wade-Trim, Inc. (WTI) is preparing the Development of Regional Impact/
Application for Development Approval (DRI/ADA) for the Sheraton Sand
Key Resort Expansion.
The Sheraton Sand Key Resort is located in Section 17, Township 29S,
Range 15E in the City of Clearwater. The resort site lies immediately
south of the Pinellas County Sand Key Park fronting on the west side
Gulf Boulevard. A general location,map is included as Map A. '
The proposed expansion of the existing 390-room resort is the addition
of approximately 750 rooms and associated amenities including
conference rooms, retail space, restaurants, health club and spa,
pool, lounges and housekeeping area.
Wade-Trim, Inc. estimates the ultimate development wil~ demand 129,737
gallons per day of potable water. Table 23-1 represents average daily
potable water demand.
Pursuant to the requirements of the DRI/ADA, please indicate the
ability of the City of Clearwater Utilities to provide potable water
services for the proposed development of Sheraton Sand Key Resort
Expansion.
Due to the time constraints, we would appreciate an expeditious reply.
Should you have any questions concerning the project, please call me
at (813) 221-2090 in Tampa.
Very truly yours,
WADE-TRIM
lb f kt1
Hung T. Mai, P.E.
HTM:ps
SSK2:12(3)
ZZZ2067-0l
Enc1 osures
EXHIBIT 23-1
23-4
Wade-Trim,lnc,
Memher of the Wade- T rom Group
201 E, Kennedy Boulevard . Suite 334 . Tampa. Florida 33602 '
813-221-2090 . telecopier: 813-229-0974
III
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.~.
r ...~., I" "I
t - '- J
~ 'ii,.,~ ..
.~..
24. PUBLIC FACILITIES: SOLID WASTE
A. PROVIDE A PROJECTION OF THE AVERAGE DAILY VOLUMES OF SOLID
WASTE GENERATED AT THE COMPLETION OF EACH PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT.
USE THE FORMAT BELOW:
As approved by the TBRPC Clearinghouse Review Committee at the
October 26, 1987 Preapplication Conference, correspondence by
the applicant outlining project demand was forwarded to the
City of Clearwater requesting confirmation of service capacity
and/or ability. Please refer to Exhibit 24-1 and Table 24-1.
B. IF ON-SITE SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL WILL BE PROVIDED, SPECIFY:
(1) THE METHOD OF DISPOSAL AND/OR RECYCLING.
(2) THE CAPACITY AND LIFE OF OPERATION,
(3) THE LOCATION AND AREA OF DISPOSAl SITE,
(4) THE METHODS OR TECHNIQUES WHICH WILL BE UTILIZED TO PREVENT
GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION. AND
(5) WHO WILL OPERATE AND MAINTAIN THE ON-SITE OPERATION.
See 24.A above.
C. IF ON-SITE SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL IS PLANNED, ATTACH A LETTER
FROM THE AGENCY OR FIRM PROVIDING SERVICE OUTLINING:
See 24.A above.
SSKI-15
24-1
Wade-Trim
II
I
I,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1I~"""'.
,. .,~' I~ ...
[=, = l
.. "".,,'" ..
iI.......
Table 24-1 Estimated Daily Volumes of Solid Waste.
PROJECT
ELEMENT
PROJECT
AMOUNT
GENERATION RATE (a)
FIRST BUILDING
Hotel &
Amenities
428 rooms
2.5 Lbs/Room/Day
SECOND BUILDING
Hotel &
Amenities
322 rooms
2.5 Lbs/Room/Day
Total
~~~ Source: Sheraton Sand Key Historical Usage
Assume to be 100% occupied
(c) Assume 243 pounds per cubic yard
SSK2: 12( 7)
24-2
AVERAGE DAILY SOLID
WASTE GENERATION (b)
LBS./DAY C.Y./DAY(c)
1070
4.4
805
1,875
3.3
7.7
Wade. Trim
II
I
i-
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.~r:I~.
.,~~~ I~"
rS=:I
~~r.~~~"
.........
Group
Services:
Engineering
Planning
Sciences
Landscape
Architecture
Wade-Trim
November 9, 1987
Mr. William C. Baker, P.E.,
Director of Public Works
City of Clearwater
112 S. Osceola Avenue
Post Office Box 4748
Clearwater, Florida 33518
Re: Determination of Refuse Collection and Disposal for Sheraton Sand
Key Resort Expansion
Clearwater, Florida
Dear Mr. Baker:
Wade-Trim, Inc. (WTI) is preparing the Development of Regional Impactl
Application for Development Approval (DRI/ADA) for the Sheraton Sand
Key Resort Expansion.
The Sheraton Sand Key Resort is located in Section 17, Township 29S,
Range 15E in the City of Clearwater. The resort site lies immediately
south of the Pinel1as County Sand Key Park fronting on the west side
Gulf Boulevard. A general location map is included as Map A.
The proposed expansion of the existing 390-room resort is the addition
of approximately 750 rooms and associated amenities including
conference rooms, retail space, restaurants, health club and spa,
pool, lounges and housekeeping area.
Wade-Trim, Inc. estimates the ultimate development wHl generate 1,875
pounds per day of solid waste. Table 24-1 represents average daily
solid waste generation.
Pursuant to the requirements of the DRI/ADA, please indicate the
ability of the City of Clearwater to provide refuse collection and
disposal services for the proposed development of Sheraton Sand Key
Resort Expansion.
Due to the time constraints, we would appreciate an expeditious reply.
Should you have any questions concerning the project, please call me
at (813) 221-2090 in Tampa.
Very truly yours,
WADE-TRIM
JJt" 'f ~ ,
Hung T. Mai, P.E.
KTI~:ps
SSK2:12(2)
ZZZ2067-01
Enclosures
EXHIBIT 24-1
24-3
Wade-Trim,lnc,
Mp.mh"r of thp. W<lde, T om Grouo
201 E, Kennedy Boulevard . Suite 334 . Tampa. Florida 33602
813-221-2090 . telecooier: 813-229-0974
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.~....
r~~'I"'"
[- =]
.. "".,."' ...
..-..
25. PUBLIC FACILITIES: ENERGY
A. PROVIDE A PROJECTION OF THE AVERAGE DAILY ENERGY DEMANDS AT THE
END OF EACH DEVELOPMENT PHASE FOR EACH OF THE FOLLOWING:
ELECTRICAL POWER, GAS, OIL, COAL, ETC. FOR ELECTRICAL POWER,
ALSO PROVIDE THE PEAK HOUR DEMAND AT THE END OF EACH PHASE.
Table 25-1. Ultimate Estimated Average Daily Electrical Energy
Consumption.
PROJECT ELEMENT PROJECT AMOUNT GENERATION RATE(a) ENERGY PROJECTION
ADD PD(b)
(KWH) (KW)
FIRST BUILDING
Hotel & Amenit;es 428 rooms
38.3 KWH/RM
16,392
1,498
SECOND BUILDING
Hotel & Amenit;es 322 rooms
38.3 KWH/RM
12,655
29,047
1,127
2,625
Tota 1
~~~ Source: Sheraton Sand Key H;stor;cal Usage
PO = 3.5 KW/RM
B. IF THERE IS TO BE AN ON-SITE ELECTRICAL GENERATING FACILITY
(POST-CONSTRUCTION) WHAT IS ITS CAPACITY AND USE?
No on-s;te electr;cal generat;ng fac;l;t;es are planned for the
development.
C. IF ELECTRICAL POWER IS TO BE OBTAINED FROM AN OFFSITE SOURCE,
ATTACH A LETTER FROM THE FIRM OR AGENCY PROVIDING SERVICE
OUTLINING:
(1) THE PROJECTED EXCESS CAPACITIES OF THE ELECTRICAL
GENERATION FACILITY AND TRANSMISSION LINE TO WHICH
CONNECTION WILL BE MADE AT PRESENT AND FOR EACH PHASE
THROUGH COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT.
(2) ANY OTHER COMMITMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN MADE FOR THIS EXCESS
CAPACITY.
25-1
Wade-Trim
I'
I
I,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I'
.~....
r~"I~"II
t --- ]
" ~i.,~ ...
.~.
(3) A STATEMENT OF THE SUPPLIER1S ABILITY TO PROVIDE SERVICE
AT ALL TIMES DURING AND AFTER DEVELOPMENT.
All electrical needs at the proposed facility will be
served by the Florida Power Corporation. A letter has
been sent to the Florida Power Corporation to verify their
ability to provide service during and after project
development and is illustrated in Exhibit 25-1.
D. WHAT CONSIDERATIONS RELATIVE TO ENERGY CONSERVATION HAVE
BEEN INCORPORATED INTO THE SITE PLANNING, BUILDING DESIGN AND
EQUIPMENT SELECTION FOR THIS PROJECT?
The project designs will consider various methods of energy
efficiency through building layout and incorporation of
energy-conserving materials and equipment. It should be noted
that all new construction must meet City of Clearwater codes
pertaining to energy-efficient design methods and equipment.
E. IF ALTERNATIVE ENERGY SOURCES HAVE BEEN CONSIDERED FOR THIS
THIS DEVELOPMENT, WHY WERE THESE AlTERNATIVES SELECTED OR
DISCHARGED? (E.G., SOLAR ENERGY SYSTEMS, ETC.)
Electrical power is the most reliable and cost-effective energy
source and has been selected for the Sheraton Sand Key.
In addition, natural gas is also utilized in conjunction with
electrical power. Average daily demand for ultimate
development is estimated 14,560 cubic feet of natural gas per
day based upon the consumption rate at the existing 390 room
facility.
As approved by the TBRPC Clearinghouse Review Committee at the
October 26, 1987 Preapplication Conference, correspondence by
the applicant outlining project demand was forwarded to the
City of Clearwater requesting confirmation of service capacity
and/or ability. Please refer to Table 25-1.
SSK1-16
25-2
Wade-Trim
I'
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.JII~IIlII.
I'~~~ I~"
. .~a. .
.,~~.
"~f.~~~.tI
.....IIIlI.
Group
Services:
Engineering
Planning
Sciences
Landscape
Architecture
Wade-Trim
November 9, 1987
Mr. Bruce Power
Florida Power Corporation
Post Office Box 1699
Clearwater, Florida 33572
Re: Determination of Electrical Power Services for Sheraton Sand
Key Resort Expansion
Clearwater, Florida
Dear Mr. Power:
Wade-Trim, Inc. (WTI) is preparing the Development of Regional Impact/
Application for Development Approval (DRI/ADA) for the Sheraton Sand
Key Resort Expansion.
The Sheraton Sand Key Resort is located in Section 17, Township 29S,
Range 15E in the City of Clearwater. The resort site lies immediately
south of the Pinellas County Sand Key Park fronting on the west side
Gulf Boulevard. A general location map is included as Map A.
The proposed expansion of the existing 390-room resort is the addition
of approximately 750 rooms and associated amenities including
conference rooms, retail space, restaurants, health club and spa,
pool, lounges and housekeeping area.
Wade-Trim, Inc. estimates the ultimate development wil~ demand 29,047
KWH per day of electric energy. Table 25-1 represents average daily
electric energy consumption.
Pursuant to the requirements of the DRI/ADA, please indicate the
ability of the Florida Power Corporation to provide electric power for
the proposed development of Sheraton Sand Key Resort Expansion.
Due to the time constraints, we would appreciate an expeditious reply.
Should you have any questions concerning the project, please call me
at (813) 221-2090 in Tampa.
Very truly yours,
WADE-TRIM
~<r~
Hung T. Mai, P.E.
HTM:ps
SSK2:12(4)
ZZZ2067-01
Enclosures
EXHIBIT 25-1
25-3
Wade-Trim,lnc,
Member of the Wade- Trim Grouo
201 E, Kennedy Boulevard . Suite 334 · Tampa, Florida 33602
813-221-2090 . telecoPler: 813-229-0974
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I
."~"'II
rr~~~ 1~11
. .~... .
· 'li~ ·
a.~r.~~~...
_ilia."'.
Group
Services:
Engineering
Planning
Sciences
Landscape
Architecture
Wade-Trim
November 13, 1987
Mr. Cecil Henderson
Utilities Director
City of Clearwater
112 S. Osceola Avenue
Post Office Box 4749
Clearwater, Florida 33518
Re: Detenm;nation of Natural Gas Supply for Sheraton Sand
Key Resort Expansion
Clearwater, Florida
Dear Mr. Henderson:
Wade-Trim, Inc. (WTI) is preparing the Development of Regional Impact/
Application for Development Approval (DRI/ADA) for the Sheraton Sand
Key Resort Expansion.
The Sheraton Sand Key Resort is located in Section 17, Township 29S,
Range 15E in the City of Clearwater. The resort site lies immediately
south of the Pinellas County Sand Key Park fronting on the west side
Gulf Boulevard. A general location map is included as Map A.
The proposed expansion of the existing 390-room resort is the addition
of approximately 750 rooms and associated amenities including
conference rooms, retail space, restaurants, health club and spa,
pool, lounges and housekeeping area.
Wade-Trim, Inc. estimates the ultimate development will demand 14,560
cubic feet per day of natural gas.
Pursuant to the requirements of the DRI/ADA, please indicate the
ability of the City of Clearwater Utilities to provide natural gas
services for the proposed development of Sheraton Sand Key Resort
Expansion.
Due to the time constraints, we would appreciate an expeditious reply.
Should you have any questions concerning the project. please call me
at (813) 221-2090 in Tampa.
Very truly yours,
WADE-TRIM
~~~
HUng~ Mai, P.E.
HTM:ps
SSK2:12(3)
ZZZ2067-01
Enclosures
EXHIBIT 25-2
25-4
Wade-Trim,lnc,
Member of the Wade-Trim Group
201 E, Kennedy Boulevard . Suite 334 . Tampa, Florida 33602
813-221-2090 . telecopler: 813-229-0974
I'
I
I,
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.~""~.
~ ..~ll~"
[=, =]
~ ~r.,,'" ..
.~tlII.
I
26. PUBLIC FACILITIES: EDUCATION
A. IF THE DEVELOPMENT CONTAINS RESIDENTIAL UNITS, ESTIMATE THE
NUMBER OF SCHOOL AGE CHILDREN EXPECTED TO RESIDE IN THE
DEVELOPMENT. REFERENCE THIS INFORMATION TO SECTION 32 ON
HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS. USE CLASS BREAKDOWNS APPROPRIATE TO
THE AREA IN WHICH THE DEVELOPMENT IS LOCATED (SPECIFY ON CHART
BELOW) :
B. WILL SCHOOL FACILITIES OR SITES BE DEDICATED OR OTHERWISE
PROVIDED ON THE SITE?
C. ATTACH A LETTER FROM THE APPROPRIATE SCHOOL BOARD, ACKNOWL-
EDGING RECEIPT OF THE ESTIMATED SCHOOL AGE POPULATION INFORMA-
TION IN (A) ABOVE, AND PROVIDING A STATEMENT OF WHAT CAPITAl
IMPROVEMENT ADJUSTMENTS WOULD BE NECESSARY TO ACCOMMODATE THESE
STUDENTS.
As approved at the October 26, 1987 TBRPC Pre-Application
Conference, no response to Question 26 is required.
SSKl-17
.
26-1
Wade-Tnm
II
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.~....
r ~~'1!!!!:: '1
[- -]
.. ...r.;," .I
.~IIIIIII.
27. PUBLIC FACILITIES: RECREATION & OPEN SPACE
A. DESCRIBE RECREATIONAL FACILITIES AND OPEN SPACE (INCLUDING
ACREAGE) WHICH WILL BE PROVIDED ON-SITE. LOCATE ON MAP H.
WILL THESE AREAS OR FACILITIES BE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC?
Of the 11.96 acres approximately 3.1 acres of recreational and
open space are to be provided on-site. Included in recreation
areas are an indoor pool. outdoor pool. pool bar. sun deck
area. indoor health club. spa and access to the Gulf Beaches.
Landscaped areas. accounting for open space on-site. will
include a sand dune system and sea oat revegetation program.
All areas designated for recreational activities will be open
and available to hotel patrons and guests. Access to the Gulf
Beaches is available to the general public on adjacent property
to the north.
B. WILL THE DEVELOPMENT REMOVE FROM PUBLIC ACCESS LANDS OR WATERS
PREVIOUSLY USED BY RESIDENTS OF THE REGION FOR HUNTING,
FISHING, BOATING OR OTHER RECREATION USES? SPECIFY.
The hotel facility and the intended expansion have not been
used for public access to the beaches for 13 years. Access is
provided by the Sand Key Park located directly north of the
existing hotel property. Therefore. the new development will
not remove from public access land or waters previously used by
residents of the region.
C. WILL PARKS AND OPEN SPACE BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OR COUNTY?
IF NOT, WHO WILL MAINTAIN THE FACILITIES?
The facilities on-site will be maintained by the owners. There
are no parks planned for dedication to the City of Clearwater
or to Pinellas County.
SSKl-18
27-1
Wade-Trim
II
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
3~"''''.
r~" I~ '1
[ . =]
.. ~r.,."' AI
1Ir...IIIIIII1I
28. PUBLIC FACILITIES: HEALTH CARE
A. WHAT MEDICAL OR HEALTH CARE FACILITIES WILL BE PROVIDED ON-
SITE? SPECIFY TYPE, SIZE, POPULATION TO BE SERVED, ETC., AND
LOCATE ON MAP H.
B. WHAT HEALTH CARE SERVICES AND FACILITIES WILL BE REQUIRED TO
MEET THE HEALTH NEEDS GENERATED BY THIS PROJECT?
No medical or health care facilities are planned to be provided
on-site. However. emergencies of a medical nature will be
responded to through the local Emergency Medical Service
offered by the City of Clearwater. Vehicles and medical
personnel will be dispatched from Station #46 on Clearwater
Beach and are able to respond to the Sheraton within two
minutes. Morton Plant Hospital. approximately 8 miles away by
motor vehicle. is capable of handling any emergency medical
situation.
A letter from the Assistant Fire Chief indicates the ability of
the EMS personnel to provide such service to the new develop-
ment and is enclosed as Exhibit 28-1.
SSKl-19
28-1
Wade-Trim
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,111I.""""-
tll"\\~L"1Ir~-=:.
t......~'-'~~
~~ -..
~i:::i d I . ';.
~ ....',,--' ~
~~ == ~~
~r-:::..;..=. ~~
~::~ ~i
'\.~"'; --- ,,<;S t~
~ 7~ T ft <(,"""
~---" E ";11"
""",,1
CI TY
OF
CLEARWATER
POST OFFICE BOX 4748
C LEA R W ATE R. F LOR IDA 33518 - 4748
Office of Fire Chief
Robert L DevidlOn
, .
... '
~,.: i
OCT ;_:~
October 27, 1987
VVr_uc- i i=,ii::
Ms. Bonnie Prinse
Wade-Trim, Inc.
201 E. Kennedy Boulevard, Suite 334
Tampa, FL 33602
Deal" Ms. Prinse:
In response to your recent letter, the Clearwater Fire
Department is aware of the proposed expansion of the
Sheraton Sand Key Resort. The Fire Department does not
feel any expansion of the Sheraton Sand Key would have
an adverse affect on the department's ability to continue
to provide emergency medical service or fire protection.
Should you have any further questions, please contact
me.
Very truly yours,
~ ::!~
Asst. Fire Chief
CFM/bak
EXHIBIT 28-1
"EqualEmploymenl and Affirmatiue Action Employer"
28-2
I'
I
I
I
I
, I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1I~"''''.
r ...~,. I....
[-- ]
.. ~r.,~ ..
.r..llllllla
29. PUBLIC FACILITIES: POLICE
WHAT POLICE PROTECTION SERVICES, FACILITIES, OR SITES WILL BE
DEDICATED OR OTHERWISE PROVIDED ON-SITE? DESCRIBE THE SERVICES
OR FACILITIES; SPECIFY ANY CONDITIONS OF DEDICATION. AND LOCATE ON
MAP H.
The City of Clearwater Police have been made aware of the proposed
project expansion at the Sheraton Sand Key Resort and have
responded favorably to continuing with police protection services.
A letter has been sent to the Clearwater Police Department
requesting confirmation of their continued ability to provide
service to the project and is enclosed as Exhibit 29-1.
SSKl-20
29-1
Wade-Tnm
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
. '.-",....,1:'2. lI""'f;;~..~.
.!;/ . -.;qt~
,.}'~.~'~ ~~~
l' _. ,_. "!
:" ....ll.. '~I at
''\ .JJ~ ,iY. ..'1
.~'rie ...en.,......,.
.:;.'~;::~._. - ....'lint
.~~ :i.fiil.l
Group
Sp.rvices:
Engineering
Planning
Sciences
Landscape
Architecture
Wade-Trim
October 7. 1987
Sid Klein. Chief of Police
City of Clearwater
644 Pierce
Clearwater. Florida 33515
Re: Sheraton Sand Key Resort Expansion
Dear Chief Klein:
This letter is a request for your review of the Sheraton Sand
Key's plans for expansion and for the City of Clearwater's
response to provision of support services. We are currently
assembling information for the Sheraton Sand Key to obtain
approval for development by the Tampa Bay Regional Planning
Council. One of the agency's concerns is the ability of the
local law enforcement to provide continued service to the
proj ect.
What we are requesting from you is a letter indicating your
awareness of the project plans and a statement that the City
of Clearwater will be able to provide police protection
service. as they have in the past.
If you have additional questions. please feel free to contact
me. I have also enclosed a general description of the
project for your review.
Si ncerely.
WADE- TR 1M. INC.
;:JJx 0-1-.;2' ~L-U
Bonnie Prinse
Environmental Scientist/Planner
Enclosure
BP:mb
SSK2:8
ZZZ2067-01
EXHIBIT 29-1
29-2
Wade-Trim. Inc.
Member of the Wade- Trim Group
201 E. Kennedy Boulevard . Suite 334 · Tampa. Florida 33602
813-221-2090 . telecopier: 813-229-0974
I'
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'I
I
, I
I
I
I
! I
I
.
~~.,.....
r~"I!!!!::'I
[ .]
a. ~r.,~ .t
.r...IIIIIII.
30. PUBLIC FACILITIES: FIRE
WHAT FIRE PROTECTION SERVICES, FACILITIES OR SITES WILL BE
DEDICATED OR OTHERWISE PROVIDED ON-SITE? DESCRIBE THE SERVICES OR
FACILITIES, SPECIFY ANY CONDITIONS OF DEDICATION; AND LOCATE ON
MAP H.
Due to the nature of the hotel/resort business. several fire
protection elements will be incorporated into the overall design
plans of the new buildings. In accordance with the City of
Clearwater Building Code. sprinkler systems will be placed
consistently throughout the establishment in conjunction with a
fire alarm warning system. Fire extinguishers will be placed on
every level and will provide for immediate response to fire
emergency situations while fire protection service will be
provided by the City of Clearwater Fire Department. A letter from
Asst. Fire Chief C. F. Meyer addressing the City's ability to
provide service is reflected in Exhibit 30-1.
SSKl-21
.
30-1
Wade-Trim
r
I
I
I
I
I
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'~L ""-
~~,tI C)\I\ .,,,,~-=:.
l~~~
li:::i ,~; . .\
~~ _ ~1
~~ -- - .', ~$
\- ~ ~~
~~- ~~
'~TE9.~;l
~,,~I
OF
CI TY
CLEARWATER
POST OFFICE BOX 4748
C LEA R W ATE R. F LOR IDA 33518 - 4748
Office of Fire Chief
Robert L Dlvidson
October 27, 1987
Ms. Bonnie Prinse
Wade-Trim, Inc.
201 E. Kennedy Boulevard, Suite 334
Tampa, FL 33602
Deal" Ms. Prinse:
In response to your recent letter, the Clearwater Fire
Department is aware of the proposed expansion of the
Sheraton Sand Key Resort. The Fire Department does not
feel any expansion of the Sheraton Sand Key would have
an adverse affect on the department's ability to continue
to provide emergency medical service or fire protection.
Should you have any further questions, please contact
me.
Very truly yours,.
~;--/ ;)n
L_ -- '11/~~2/1
C. F. Meye<l'
Asst. Fire Chief
CFM/bak
EXHIBIT 30-1
"Equal Employment and A.ffirmatiue Action Employer"
30-2
I,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'lI~"'''.
r~"I~"lI
[_. = 1
;\ ..r..."' ...
.~.
31. PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES-TRANSPORTATION CONSIDERATIONS
A. USING MAP J AS A BASE, INDICATE EXISTING CONDITIONS ON THE
HIGHWAY NETWORK WITHIN THE PRIMARY IMPACT AREA (AS PREVIOUSLY
DEFINED BY MAP J), INCLUDING ADT, PEAK-HOUR TRIPS, DIRECTIONAL
TRAFFIC LOAD, LEVEL OF SERVICE AND ROADWAY CAPACITY. WHAT
IMPROVEMENTS OR NEW FACILITIES, WHICH WILL HAVE AN INFLUENCE ON
THIS PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, ARE PLANNED OR PROGRAMMED? ATTACH A
LETTER FROM THE APPROPRIATE AGENCY STATING THE CURRENT STATUS
OF THE PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS.
(1) a. EXISTING CONDITIONS ON THE ENTIRE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK
INCLUDING BOTH INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL CONDITIONS;
b. THIS DESCRIPTION SHOULD ALSO INCLUDE THE LEVEL OF
TRANSIT SERVICE.
EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS
The proposed project is located on Sand Key. just south
of Clearwater Beach and adjacent to Sand Key Park. The
major roadway facilities in the surrounding area are
discussed in this section of the report.
St reet Net \'to rk
A map displaying the roadway net\'tOrk that serves the
project area is included as Exhibit 31-1. Major
roadways in the area include:
o Gulf Boulevard is a roadway that runs along the coast
between Clearwater Pass and St. Petersburg Beach. In
the area of the project. Gulf Boulevard is a two-lane
roadway. The Sheraton Sand Key property fronts on Gulf
Boul evard.
o Gulfview Boulevard is a three-lane undivided roadway
that runs from Clearwater Pass to Causeway Boulevard.
o S.R. 60 is an east-west roadway that connects Clearwater
Beach. approximately 2.0 miles north of the project.
with Hillsborough County via the Courtney Campbell
Causeway. On the Clearwater Causeway. the road is a
four-lane divided facility and through downtown
Clearwater. SR 60 is a pair of three-lane one-way
streets. For the rest of its traverse across Pinellas
County. SR 60 is a six-lane divided facility.
o Belleair Causeway/East Bay Boulevard isan east-west
facility that runs between Belleair Beach and Ulmerton
Road in the area of the St. Petersburg-Clearwater
31-1
Wade-Trim
I
, .'
I
I
. ,
, .
. ,.',
N
~
I
I
.
o 0.25 0.5
SCALE IN MILES
DREW ST.
CLEVELAND ST.
I
. ....
PROJECT SITE' ,;.:,
"
CHESTNUT ST,
,I
I
I,
I
I
"
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ULMERTON RD.
, .'
en
(S
o
II:
Z
<
5
2: WALSINGHAM RD.
, ,I
SHERATON
SAND KEY RESORT
~ ~~.~:.;rim Lo....... ....II...w.
Planning Environmental Selene..
EXISTING
ROADWAY NETWORK
31-1
BELLEAIR RD.
~
iC
::l
o
en
en
j
E. BAY DR.
ci
II:
III
CJ
Q
iC
ci
~
ClI
III
5
z
j
III
II)
GULF-TO-BAY
BLVD.
~
Q
Z
<
...
:z:
CJ
:
EXHIBIT
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I-
t
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
:':l~"'''.
r~"I"''I
[-- ]
.. ~r.,!i .1
:IIr....
Airport. Between Gulf Boulevard and Clearwater-Largo
Road. the roadway has two lanes. East of that point.
the roadway is a four-lane divided facility. The
intersection of this roadway and Gulf Boulevard is
approximately 2.3 miles south of the project.
o Ulmerton Road runs from Indian Rocks Beach. approximate-
ly 4.6 miles south of the project. to 1-275 and Hills-
borough County via the Howard Frankland Bridge. Ulmerton
Road is a four-lane divided facility.
Traffic Vol urnes
Existing traffic volumes were obtained from the Florida
Department of Transportation (FDOT). the Pinellas County
Traffic Engineering Department and the City of
Clearwater Traffic Engineering Department. as well as
recent traffic studies in the area. The available
informati on was suppl emented wi th counts conducted by
Wade- Trim.
All traffic counts were adjusted to reflect annualized
average volumes. This was done using factors that were
developed based on count data collected at the toll
bridge at Clearwater Pass during 1986. Based upon these
data. adjustment factors of 1.371 and 1.334 were
calculated for the months of September and October
respectively. the months during which all counts were
conducted. These factors indicate that traffic volumes
during those months are approximately 25 percent below
the yearly average. so the counts that Wade-Trim
conducted or collected were multiplied by the above-
cited factors to compensate for the seasonal differ-
ences.
All 1985 and 1986 volumes were increased by an annual
growth factor of 1.1 percent to approximate 1987
conditions. The existing P.M. peak hour turning
movement volumes at the intersections are shown on
Exhibit 31-2. The existing link volumes are contained
in Table 31-1.
Level-of-Service
The concept of level-of-service (LOS) is a qualitative
measure that describes operational conditions within a
traffic stream and relates them to the perceptions of
motorists. The level-of-service generally describes
these conditions in terms of such factors as speed and
travel time. freedom to maneuver. traffic interruptions.
comfort and convenience. and safety.
31-3
Wade- Trrm
It
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
>
<C
>-
<C
...J
<C
C
Z
<C
v :E
M
....co
"Q.
"". ~\..
~~~
ci"~ro
)1
<C
t=
....
UJ
CJ)
z
a
l1..
It)
""0
v....
'- 98
.- 1292
r 27
MARIANNE
)1
~t
It) co
v ,...
.... M
(\10)
M....
)~
180 J
1102 ...
LEGEND
238 = 1987 TRAFFIC VOLUME
SHERATON
SAND KEY RESORT
~ Wade-Trim
B Engineering Land.eape Arehltectwe
PI.nnlng Envlronm.ntal Selene..
EXISTING P.M. PEAK HOUR
TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES
31-2
'- 539
.-15
r- 747
f
(\I
M
(\I
>-
<C
:=
C
Z
<C
...J
CJ)
'- 251
.- 862
MARIANNE
MEMORIAL CSY.
N
~
EXHI BIT
Ii
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
t
I
I
I
t
I
I
t
I
I,
I
ci ci
> >
...J ...J
10 10
U. U.
...J ...J
::> ::>
(o!) ~
Oil) ""
~~ en....
C\IC\1 '- 379 C\I('1') '- 491
l~ l~
r- 404 ,340
W ALSINGHAM
t( BELLEAIR CSY. t(
en" Il)en
<O~ "('I')
....C\1 C\IC\1
ri
o
z
UJ
o
~
<
J:
o
o
<
z
o
a:
o
o
coco
~co
"C\1
743J
.
3~
)1
~t
GULFVIEW BLVD.
....CO
co
~
LEGEND
N
~
238 = 1987 TRAFFIC VOLUME
SHERATON
SAND KEY RESORT
~ Wade-Trim
a Englne.rlng Landscape Archltectw.
Planning Envlronm.ntal Sclenc..
EXHIBIT
EXISTING P.M. PEAK HOUR
TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES. 31-2
It
I
I.
I
I
___: COP)
..-il""a b le~; TABlE 31-1
~'I LINK AfO'll VSIS
EXISTlfiJ CONDITIONS
1'367 1'367 1'367
DlRECTlOfIAl. DIRECTlCHl1l DlRECTlor~
Typical PEAl< HOUR TRAFFIC PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC PEAK HOUR
Rctadwit,. SKt i CJrt He/a SB/WB we LOS CAPACITY
---
Mewlri i I CiU51'lti'''
Drw to Isli1l'G w~ U 2004 1265 0.8'3 I) ~
151 al'llf Way to flIi'ri il'<<rte ~LB 1282 1007 O.S7 A ~.A)
Cauway Sho.
MlrncIali')' to lInarial aM~ 1m o.so I) 1863
Mar-iill'''. St.
Mnorial ClOy. to Poi'l'cSKtia 4L 0HE-iMW 1~ 0.61 S 25
llfJi'f1H\t ia to Ma1Idilay 4L ONE-wA'/ 1S70 0.61 B 25
MlrncIalay 1M.
Mnarial CIty. to Papirfa 2W 764 635 1.20 E 6J'3
Cau51Wil'f Blvd. to Sal hi... ~u 683 7n 0.61 B 122~
Salt-ti... Shd.
Cctrunado to Hadert 3l..U ~ 613 ft. 6'3 B 8'30
tMdll'l to CIRnlllttrl" hn 3tU ~1 ~ 0.61 B 8'30
Gulf Shd.
SheratO'tt to Clnneat..,. Pan 2W 275 375 ft.~ A 6J'3
Sh..-atCJrt to Btollnir Csy. au ~ J63 O.M B 6J'3
gelleail' Csy. to WalsiYlghaa 2W 5+8 580 0.'31 I) 63'3
Ilirhi'fl!haJt. to Pm Bhel. 2l.U 63S 6'36 1.0'3 E 6J'3
.
gellni.... Csy.
Gltlf Bhd. tCf HI'I"tlar- 'Ji... au 37'3 ~ o.J'3 A Ice;
Wills i 1lghilt Rd.
Gulf Blvd. to' lfa1ilt ~U 110 1001 0.82 C 1224
tmE:
JoJIC Thrfthctlds obhiMd f'f'(Jlt 1'365 HigtrNy Caflac-ity fII8woil
-Peak hwr eapatitin fO'l' en~, 2 lill'le' divino colllC'tOl'S al'llf i'l"tllrillls
tikl'l'r it . os Cff FOOT diily ciflieitiH fClr" si.U.... fici lit.,. type.
-2lD=2 lanes di'tided,21.\J1r2 l~.. llTGivided, Ke.
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
i
I
I
I
FN:SHI987
I~
I'
I
I
I
I
I
t
i
I
I
t
j
I
t
I
I
.,
I
I
.~....
r~" 1"11
[ ...= 1
~ ~l.,~... .
..........
The following definitions are included in the 1985
Highway Capacity Manual:
o Level-of-service A represents free flow. Individual
users are virtually unaffected by the presence of others
in the traffic stream. Freedom to select desired speeds
and to maneuver within the traffic stream is extremely
high. The general level of comfort and convenience
provided to the motorist. passenger, or pedestrian is
excellent.
o Level-of-service B is in the range of stable flow, but
the presence of other users in the traffic stream begins
to be noticeable. Freedom to select desired speeds is
relatively unaffected. but there is a slight decline in
the freedom to maneuver within the traffic stream from
LOS A. The level of comfort and convenience provided is
somewhat less than at LOS A because the presence of
others in the traffic stream begins to affect individual
behavior.
o Level-of-service C is in the range of stable flow. but
marks the beginning of the range of flow in which the
operation of individual users becomes significantly
affected by interactions with others in the traffic
stream. The selection of speed is now affected by the
presence of others. and maneuvering within the traffic
stream requires substantial vigilance on the part of the
user. The general level of comfort and convenience
declines noticeably at this level.
o Level-of-service D represents high-density. but stable.
flow. Speed and freedom to maneuver are severely re-
stricteq. and the driver or pedestrian experiences
generally poor level of comfort and convenience. Small
increases in traffic flow will generally cause opera-
tional problems at this level.
o Level-of-service E represents operating conditions at or
near the capacity level. All speeds are reduced to a
low, but relatively uniform. value. Freedom to maneuver
within the traffic stream is extremely difficult, and it
is generally accomplished by forcing a vehicle or pedes-
trian to ugive wayu to accommodate such maneuvers.
Comfort and convenience levels are extremely poor, and
driver or pedestrian frustration is generally high.
Operations at this level are usually unstable. because
small increases in flow or minor perturbations within
the traffic stream will cause breakdowns.
Wade-Trim
31-7
I.'
I
'I
I
I
J
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
.~.
r~!rt'
....~..
....1IIlI.
o Level-of-service F is used to define forced or breakdown
flow. This condition exists wherever the amount of
traffic approaching a point exceeds the amount which can
traverse the point. Queues form behind such locations.
Operations within the queue are characterized by stop-
and-go waves. and they are extremely unstable. Vehicles
may progress at reasonable speeds for several hundred
feet or more, then be required to stop in a cyclic
fashion. Level-of-service F is used to describe the
operating conditions within the queue. as well as the
point of the breakdown. It should be noted, however.
that in many cases operating conditions of vehicles or
pedestrians discharged from the queue may be quite good.
Nevertheless. it is the point at which arrival flow
exceeds discharge flow which causes the queue to form.
and level-of-service F is an appropriate designation for
such points.
Policies of the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council
(TBRPC) have established LOS D as the minimum acceptable
standard for peak hour operation of the region's road-
ways. For daily operation, LOS C has been set as the
standard. If a particular facility is analyzed and
determined to operate at a level-of-service equal to or
better than these thresholds, improvements are not
deemed necessary.
The analysis performed for this report used standard
methodologies for determining the peak hour level-of-
service of intersections. roadways and bridges. For
intersections, the level-of-service was determined using
the Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) techniques de-
scribed in Transportation Research Circular 212, Interim
Materials in Highway ca~acity. dated January 1980 as
well as the procedures efined in the 1985 Highway
caracity Manual. For roadway links and bridges.
ex sting and projected traffic volumes were compared to
the Capacity Tables contained in the Urban
Transportation Planning Model Update-Phase II. Task C.
prepared by Comsis in October 1981.
The existing peak hour levels-of-service are displayed
on Exhibit 31-3.
PROGRAMMED TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS
The Pinellas County Metropolitan Planning Organization
TransGortation Im~rovement Program for Fiscal Years
1988- 9 through 9 -94 indicates that Gulf Boulevard will
'be widened to a three-lane divided roadway from the
Clearwater Pass Bridge to Indian Rocks Beach. Construc-
tion funds are committed and the work is scheduled for
Wade- Trim
31-8
I'
I
I. ~ ~
> < >
< ~ <
..J ;:
I < w
c U) 0
z ~ z z
< A 0 <
::E MARIANN; ~ ..J ~
GULFVIEW ~
I @ CORONADO JJ ;:
w
~ a:
c
I CAUSEWAY BLVD.
0 MEMORIAL CAUSEWAY
A CAUSEWAY
I @ CORONADO ~ COURT ST.
~~
~U'
I )-
.
N
I ~
PR~~cr b
I
I
d
>
I, ..J
CD
U.
..J
~
t (!) )ID
BEllEAIR CAUSEWAY
I
I )9J W AlSINGHAM RD.
I
I
I SHERATON
SAND KEY RESORT EXISTING INTERSECTiON
I ~ Wade-Trim P.M. PEAK HOUR 31-3
. Engineering _ Landscape Arc"ltectll'e LEVELS OF SERVICE
Planning Environmental ScIences
I'
I
I.
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
il
I
t
t
I
I
I
I
I
.
.~....
r ...~,' Itl..
[- .-]
.. ~P.,~ ...
.~IIIIII.
FY 1989-90. All analyses conducted for a later time
period assume that this improvement is in place.
A letter from Pinellas County confirming the status of
this improvement is included as Exhibit 31-4.
PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION
Existing public transit service is provided to the
Sheraton Sand Key by a trolley bus and fixed route bus
service. The trolley bus runs the extent of Clearwater
Beach along Gulfview and Mandalay Avenues. with a
headway of approximately thirty minutes from 10:15 am to
6:15 pm. Fixed route bus service is provided directly
to the Sheraton Sand Key by PSTA Route 76. with primary
destination points of Clearwater Beach. downtown
Clearwater. and Countryside Mall. and an approximate
headway of one hour from 9:00 am to 5:00 pm. Service
information and schedules are provided at centrally
located and accessible locations to further utilization
of available mass transit. Adequately designed bus
pullout bays and shelters are provided on-site.
B. PROVIDE A PROJECTION OF TRAFFIC NOT GENERATED BY THIS DEVELOP-
MENT ON THE HIGHWAY NETWORK WITHIN THE PRIMARY AREA AT THE END
OF EACH PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT.
(1) PROVIDE A PROJECTION OF PERSON TRIPS NOT GENERATED BY THIS
DEVELOPMENT ON THE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK (INCLUDING
THROUGH TRIPS) WITHIN THE INTERNAL TRANSPORTATION NEWORK
OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT AS WELL AS THE PRIMARY IMPACT AREA
AT THE END OF EACH PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT. STATE ALL
STANDARDS AND ASSUMPTIONS USED, INCLUDING TRIP GENERATION
RATES BY LAND USE, TYPES, MODAL SPLIT, PERSONS PER VEHICLE,
Existing traffic volumes for the intersections and links
being studied were increased by a growth factor of 1.1
percent per year. This factor was based on historical
trends of count data provided by the City of Clearwater
Traffic Engineering Department.
The existing background traffic was further increased by a
second factor, the projected growth on Sand Key. Ms. Paula
Harvey, Planning Director for the City of Clearwater,
provided information on the allowable total build-out of
Sand Key. This included the worst case scenario of 480
condominiums plus 363 condominiums that have been. approved
but not yet built, and 940 hotel rooms. This is in
addition to the existing development. This amount of
additional development will. generate 14.254 additional
31-10
Wade-Trim
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
....~...II
.IJ~ I~~
. .~a. .
.'.~.
..~r.~~~
.11I.....
Group
Services:
Engineering
Planning
Sciences
Landscape
Architecture
Wade-Trim
October 19, 1987
Mr. Hugh Pascoe
Transportation Planning Administrator ,~ .... _ _-.._____....
Pi ne 11 as County R E [h\~ ,.... ;r .' '1 ',;~ "'"
440 Court Street .\: .. r,.. :. L, -.. ':~~ i
u ';Jt' ,-,:~. t: .. ~. l..,;:
::::~:~e::s:::~j d. 34616 , U C I ~ 0 1001 I
Wade- T~im. Inc. is current1 y conduct i ng the t ransporta~ ipp~~ ~: ~,~:~~.:. 11\~Cr~;jT;.:~,f' ~
analyslS for the Sheraton DRI, Clearwater. Roadway imp.t.'O_v~~~n.t~~~__:~' I.., ..,;.',u L
found in the Pi nell as County TIP, with construction funds . .. - '...-, ---
committed for fiscal years 1988-89 and 1989-90. will be
considered in the analysis as in place. The following roadway
improvements have been identified within the project study area
as future roadway improvements:
o Gulf Boulevard (CR 208)
Construction funded FY 87-88 (1065)
From 5th Avenue to 28th Avenue
Improved to 2 lane divided
o Gulf Boulevard (CR 208)
Construction funded FY 88-89 (1014)
From N. Indian Rocks city limits (28th Ave.) to
Clearwater Pass
Improved to 2 lane divided
If you agree with the current status of the above planned
improvements, please endorse your concurrence below and return
this letter. Your timely response will be most appreciated.
I concur with the above roadway improvements, as found
in the Pine11as County Transportation Improvement
Program, October 1987.
~.
Sincerely,
WADE-TRIM
11~ ti.Jh
,
, "
.. ..
-#~.~.i::}
O(\T ~:) 1987
'" '_ ...,J
Nathaniel Fisher
Transportation Planner
'1 .1." .::.:r;~i:.'A
NCF:mh
NCF1:24
ZZZ2067.04
EXHIBIT 31-4
31-11
Wade-Trim, Inc.
Member of the Wade- Trim Group
201 E. Kennedy Boulevard . Suite 334 · Tampa, Florida 33602
813-221-2090 · telecopier: 813-229-0974
I'
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.~....
r .....~l lit....
[...- ]
~ ='i.,~ JI
.........
daily trips. using the ITE Trip Generation rates. A twenty
year period was assumed as reasonable for the total
build-out of Sand Key. These trips were distributed to
Gulf Boulevard north and south of the general area of
construction in proportion to the existing volumes on the
roadway. That is. the existing traffic on Gulf Boulevard
south of the area is 1.62 times the volume north of the
area. so the new traffic was distributed in the same ratio.
The peak hour directional volumes were determined by first
calculating the existing directional split of peak hour
traffic as a percentage of daily traffic. This was done
using 24-hour traffic count data from Gulf Boulevard
collected by Wade-Trim. These percentages were then
applied to the projected daily generation of trips from the
new development to obtain peak hour directional volumes of
allowable development traffic. The increased existing
traffic and 50 percent of the allowable development traffic
were added to obtain total background traffic for 1997.
Only half the allowable development traffic was added since
the Sheraton build-out is 1997 and the Sand Key build-out
is projected for 2007. The background roadway link traffic
volumes for 1997 are shown on Exhibit 31-5.
It is unlikely that such a high level of development will
ever occur on Sand Key. The other scenarios that were
presented by Ms. Harvey include:
o 1,070 condominiums; 7.452 additional daily trips
o 960 condominiums. 220 hotel rooms; 9,190 additional
daily trips
o 590 condominiums. 720 hotel rooms; 12.516 additional
daily trips
These numbers indicate that the impact from other Sand Key
development could range from 88 to 52 percent of the
traffic included in this analysis. It is reasonable to
assume that one of these lesser scenarios of development
will occur and therefore. the analysis contained in this
document overstates the impact of this traffic component
and therefore overstates the potential need for mitigation.
C. PROJECTION OF VEHICLE TRIPS EXPECTED TO BE GENERATED BY THIS
DEVELOPMENT AT THE END OF EACH PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT. STATE ALL
STANDARDS AND ASSUMPTIONS USED, INCLUDING TRIP GENERATION RATES
BY LAND USE TYPES, MODAL SPLIT, PERSONS PER VEHICLE, ETC.
(1) ANSWER QUESTION C IN THE ADA, ON THE BASIS OF PERSON TRIPS
RATHER THAN VEHICLE TRIPS. .
To obtain a trip rate for the expansion of the facility.
traffic counts were conducted at the existing hotel for a
one week peri ode
31-12
Wade-Trim
I'
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I'
SHERATON
SAND KEY RESORT
~ Wade-Trim
Jl. Engineering Landscape Archltect",e
Q Planning Environmental Sciences
0) CD
C\l It)
CD ,...
u n
~ ('I)
.... C\l
+ +
It) It)
.... ('I)
CD ,...
I t
~ ('I)
.... CD
~ CD
. .
o ....
It) CD
+ +
~ C\l
CD 0
CD CD
J t
~ CD
> 10 ~
< 0 ~
..J""
~~lt~
Z + It)
< .... C\l
20) CD
CD
~
<
I:
w
en
z
C5
a..
~
1676+48-1724
.-.
>
<
~
C
Z
<
..J
~
MARIANNE
~
1356+48-1404 ~.
.-.
MEMORIAL CAUSEWAY
-. -.
1344+79-1423 2145+79-2224
~~
~~
\5')-
.
CQURTST.
CAUSEWAY BLVD.
a: -.
c 1584+79-1663
Z
~
2
<
:t
~~ V
6' ~~ ". It:
~ ~'7
~x~' 0
,"is'O ~ If,- . '7 ~
,~~~ is',,.
6'~ <? 6'
PROJEcr~ ~l tOil)
SITE ~....o
. + ('I)
C\l ~.
CD 0
+ C\l
~
II)
('I)
LEGEND
222+33-255..........
~ I "
BACKGROUND + SANDK-EY _ TOTAL TRAFFIC
TRAFFIC TRAFFIC
('I)
C\l 0
~
II) t;
~l
+
.... m 379+69-448
+ ('I)
. C\l .... BELLEAIR CAUSEWAY
('I) N
~ ci CD -. 379+42-421 ~
CD 0
a ~ CD
~l CD t~
u. 1055+56-1111
-'
CD ::) ('I) ..- W ALSINGHAM RD.
II) " ....
II)
-.
('I) II) 754+34-788
,... 0
,... ,...
;1 t~
0) II)
~ CD
,... CD
EXHI BIT
1997 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC
31-5
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.~IlIII.
,. .-:~' !~ 'I
[_. -] -
.. ~r.,.:' ...
.~.
The data that were collected are:
Volume of Vehicles (P.M. Peak)
No. of Confer-ence
Nor-th South Dr-ive Occupied Space
Day of Count Dr-lve In Out Rooms Used (SF)
9/21 56 50 40 169 0
9/22 81 103 75 356 12.904
9/23 92 119 140 382 15,500'
9/24 86 81 99 379 .15.500
9/25 92 109 107 378 '10.304
Aver-age 8T 92 92 m
Trip generation rates were then determined based on the existing
number of occupied rooms. The trip rates that were calculated
are:
o PM peak hour lnbound
o PM peak hour. outbound
0.40 trips occupied per room
0.40 trips occupied per room
The calculated trip rates were used to estimate the number of
trips that the expansion of the hotel will generate.
There was some concern that a trip rate based only on
occupied rooms would be inaccurate due to the amount of
conference space at the hotel. For example, there could be
a local conference at the hotel where no rooms are
occupied and the trip generation rate would indicate that
such a conference would generate zero trips. This
situation dld not occur during the period studied by
Wade- Trim.
The Sheraton Sand Key has 15.500 square feet of conference
facilities. For two of the study days, all of the
facilities were being used. On two more days. 66 percent
and 83 percent of the conference facilities were used. On
Monday, the day when none of the facilities were being
used. people were checking into the hotel for conferences
that week. Trips on Monday were being generated (at a rate
almost exactly that being used for the DR! analysis) but
the conference facilities were not generating them. When
the conference facilities were in use. the trip rate fell
slightly. but not a significant amount. Thus. based on
this data. the trip rate based on the number of occupied
rooms is appropriate.
31-14
Wade-Trim
I'
I
I
I
.1
I
I
I
I
I
'I
I
I
I
I
'I
I,
.'
I
..........
r ..,~' ,... 't
[= =]
.. ....r.",. ..II
Hr..IIIIIII.
Using these trip generation rates, the expansion of the
Sheraton Sand Key is anticipated to generate the following
number of vehicle trips:
Land Use Amount
Trip Generation (Vehicle Trips)
PM Inbound PM Outbound
Hotel
750 rooms
300
300
This assumes that all 750 rooms are occupied. providing a
conservative analysis of traffic impact.
Vehicle trips were converted to person trips by applying a
vehicular occupancy rate of 1.6 persons per vehicle. This
rate was obtained from NCHRP Report Number 187 Quick
Response Urban Travel Estimation Techniques and Transfer-
able Parameters. Using this rate. the Sheraton Sand Key
expansion is estimated to generate 480 PM peak hour inbound
person trips ~nd 480 PM peak hour outbound person trips.
D. ESTIMATE THE INTERNAL/EXTERNAL SPLIT FOR THE GENERATED TRIPS
AT THE END OF EACH PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT AS SHOWN IN (C), ABOVE.
USE THE FORMAT BELOW AND INCLUDE A DISCUSSION OF WHAT ASPECTS
OF THE DEVELOPMENT WILL ACCOUNT FOR THIS INTERNAL/EXTERNAL
SPLIT.
(1) ESTIMATE THE EXTERNAL/INTERNAL SPLIT FOR THE GENERATED
TRIPS AT THE END OF EACH PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT AS SHOWN IN
(e) ABOVE. USE THE FORMAT BELOW AND INCLUDE A DISCUSSION
OF WHAT ASPECTS OF THE DEVELOPMENT (I.E. PROVISION OF ON-
SITE SHOPPING AND RECREATION FACILITIES, ON-SITE EMPLOYMENT
OPPORTUNITIES, ETC.) WILL ACCOUNT FOR THESE SPLITS?
Since the trip generation rate used in Question 31C of this
report is based on actual counts at the project site. it
would take into consideration current internal capture of
trips and transit usage. Therefore. no additional capture
of trips is proposed.
E. USING MAP J AS A BASE, ASSIGN THE TRIPS GENERATED BY THIS
DEVELOPMENT AS SHOWN IN (C) ABOVE AND SHOW SEPARATELY THE
TRAFFIC NOT GENERATED BY THIS DEVELOPMENT AS SHOWN IN (8) ABOVE
TO THE HIGHWAY NETWORK WITHIN THE PRIMARY IMPACT AREA, AND
INCLUDE ADT, PEAK HOUR TRIPS AND DIRECTIONAL TRAFFIC LOAD. IF
NECESSARY, PROVIDE A SEPARATE MAP J FOR EACH PHASE OF DEVELOP-
MENT SHOWING EXPECTED CONDITIONS AT THE END OF EACH PHASE.
Because the project is a hotel, it has a distribution of trips
that is different from the standard DRI project. A hotel that
serves a large number of tourists does not have the normal
pattern of home-based and non-home-based trips. Visitors to
the Sheraton Sand Key will make trips to the local beaches.
31-15
Wade-Trim
I'
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.~.,.~.
r ..~. I.....
[ =.-1
.....r.,~..1
.~ilIl.
restaurants and tourist attractions instead of to and from
work. Therefore. the computer models that are normally used
are not applicable for this project.
To develop a distribution for project trips. an origin-destin-
ation study was conducted during the PM peak period for three
days. Vehicles going into and out of the Sheraton Sand Key
were stopped and the driver was asked his origin/destination
and his main routes of travel.
From this information. a PM peak hour trip distribution pattern
was developed. This distribution was reviewed by the agencies
and is shown as Exhibit 31-6.
During the PM peak hour. 43 percent of the vehicles that leave
the project travel north toward Clearwater Beach. Eight
percent of the project traffic has Clearwater Beach as their
destination. eight percent continues northward toward Dunedin
and Tarpon Springs, and 27 percent travel east on SR 60 to
destinations in eastern Pinellas County and Hillsborough
County.
Fifty-seven percent of the PM peak hour project traffic travels
southward from this project. Seven percent of the project
traffic turns east to go over the Belleair Causeway. seven
percent travels eastward on Ulmerton Road and 38 percent
continues south on Gulf Boulevard.
The inbound distribution during the PM peak hour is very
different. Three-quarters of the inbound traffic is from the
north primarily from Tampa International Airport. The inbound
traffic from the south was divided among several origins.
Exhibit 31-7 illustrates the assignment of project traffic at
the intersections analyzed.
.
F. BASED ON PROJECTED TRIPS AS SHOWN IN (E) ABOVE, WHAT MODIFICA-
TIONS IN THE HIGHWAY NETWORK (INCLUDING INTERSECTIONS) WILL BE
NECESSARY AS A RESULT OF THIS DEVELOPMENT? SPECIFY IMPROVE-
MENTS NEEDED INITIALLY AND AT THE END OF EACH PHASE OF DEVELOP-
MENT.
(1) AN'SWER QUESTION 31 F, ABOVE, ON THE BASIS OF THE ENTIRE
TRANSPORTATION NETWORK (RATHER THAN JUST THE HIGHWAY
NETWORK) INCLUDING INTERSECTIONS AND ACCESS POINTS TO THE
DRI. INCLUDE APPROPRIATE MASS TRANSIT CONSIDERATIONS.
(2) WHO WILL PAY FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO THE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM
SPECIFIED IN QUESTION 31F.
Tables 31-2A. Band C display the results of the roadway
link analysis and Table 31-3 displays the intersection
analysis results. The 1997 levels of service for
intersections are displayed on Exhibit 31-8. The analyses
Wade-Trim
31-16
I'
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
160
"CAUSEWAY BLVD. ~ MEMORIAL CAUSEWAY
ex: ~ ~'\
~
<
f:
w
en
z
6
Q.
201
r
MARIANNE
<0,
~
t 69
I L c.2
....
135 21 21
IL C7
114 21 ....
21
SHERATON
SAND KEY RESORT.
~)Wade-Trim .
. Engineering. Landscape Archltec"..
Planning' Environmental Sciences
>-
4(
;:
C
Z
4(
..J
~
~
;:
w
a:
c
~
~~
~~
~
.
N
~
BELLEAIR CAUSEWAY
W ALSINGHAM RD.
~
en
4(
..J
o
~
o
COURT ST.
LEGEND
....
DIRECTIONAL PEAK HOUR VEHICLE TRIPS
1997 PROJECT TRIP
DISTRIBUTION
EXHI BIT
31-'6
I'
I c:i c:i
> >
...J ...J
co co
LL. LL.
I ...J ...J
:::> :::>
C) C)
I GOGO It)
C\I1' I' I'
...... 0) It)
NORTH )1 SOUTH )1
I SHERATON DR. SHERATON DR.
74~ ~t 55~ ~t
97, 74~
I C')..... C\I co
.co C') 0
. .
I
I
N
I ~
a:
I c GO
Z 0 It)
0
w c .....
c c( .
~ Z C')
I < 0 .....
C\I
J: a: +
0 It) 0
U . C\I
GO C')
I . )1
C\IC\1C\1
C\IC\1.....
GULFVIEW BLVD.
I 906+105-1011 -J ~t
O~
~ G~ C\I co
I GO
~;' ~~t-: It)
.
~ <1'\1 O;')(~ ~~ .
C\I
> <9)( <I'~ ~< +
I ;' O~ ;'~.s- va C\I
co
~~ . It)
<I'\T
I LEGEND
~. 222+133-255...........
I BACKOROUND ~RO.IECT . TOTAL TRA"IC
TRA"'C TRA"IC
I SHERATON EXHIBIT
SAND KEY RESORT 1997 P.M. PEAK HOUR
I ~ Wade-Trim TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES 31-7
a Engineering Landscape Archltectll'e
Planning Environmental Sciences
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
~
"Q.
:-{ ~~
~~~
c~'U~
\<.. ~
~ ~ "t,
~ ~ ~
)( ~ ("
~ 0 7,
p cj' -
'to 'to _
~ ~ ,~
~ ~
61
<
f:
w
en
z
6
11.
C") ,...
It) .....
.....
'- 109
.... 1480+201-1681
,30
MARIANNE
)1
~t
<0 0
C") N
~
0) >-
<
N ..J
,... <
II
N C
..... Z
+ <
,... ::E
.....
..... ,...
)1
..... co
<0 .....
..... ~
)~
.200 ..J
1302+81-1383 .-.
LEGEND
~ 222+133-255,
BACKGROUND . 'ROJICT . TOTAL TRAlIlIlC
TRAlIlIlC TRAffiC
SHERATON
SAND KEY RESORT
~ Wade-Trim
8 Engln.erlng Land.cape Architecture
Planning Envlronmenta' Scllne..
'- 598
.... 1 6
~ 877+201-1078
MARIANNE
t
It)
o
C")
II
~
N
+
.....
co
N
>-
<
~
C
Z
<
..J
en
.
'- 278
.... 1005+201-1206
MEMORIAL CSY.
N
~
EXHIBIT
1997 P.M. PEAK HOUR
TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES 31-7
I'
I .
I.
I
I
I
I ci ci
~ >
-I
- a:I CD
<0 It) CO
~ CO) U. <0 .... U.
. CO) -I ~ 0 -I
I It) . ::) . ~ ::)
CO) - ~ ~ . ~
- N - -
+ + - N
<0 ~ + +
N - ~ <0
I CO) CO) It) CO
'- 490+12-502 CO) CO) '- 601+27-628
1\ 1\
r- 449 r- 378
I W ALSINGHAM
t( BELLEAIR CSY. tf
I
<0 ~ It) It)
~ .... ~<O
CO) N co)N
.
....
I It)
+
(7)
co
N
I
I
I N
I
!
I LEGEND ~
........- 222+ra-u5,",
I - BACKGROUND I"ROJECT
. TRAI'FIC . TOTAL TRAI'''IC
TRAFFIC
"-. ~
SHERATON """I
I EXHIBIT
SAND KEY RESORT 1997 P.M. PEAK HOUR
"-.
I ~ Wade-Trim . TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES 31-7
B Engineering Landscape Arctlltectll'e
. Planning . En'Ylronmental Sciences ~
II
I
I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
:1
I
:1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
~
colfl1
!i~
ii~
li~
U~
~
1;=
~I!
co ...
...
I +;)1
!U hl~
... :a
i~1
"II ~~}I
E Ii!lm
I i
...
i&;!
"~Bl
Il~
- 5
e...
ii
~i I Ii ~i ii
f
I
Ij
I~:
~l
:1
-I-
i ~
....c
co
~~
00
~
o
"'c
...
SlP;
00
~
o
II
~
~l6
... ...
i!
~
......
... ...
... ...
~~
~
IE
i!
~
~=
.
~ ~,
* **
II! '$ '$
-=
i Ii'
~ ~j
I .0
o !:'..
.. Ci ..
lli' .;; 1
it ill
~ ~
....
.......
~:B
00
~~
":.0
.. ..
.... ..
- ...
.,..,.
00
<!>...
-.,.
-0
II
!~
... ...
i~
~~
~~
... ...
~~
<!>~
~~
... ...
~!::
~5i
!~
~;
I ::;
i~ c ~
., 3 If i
-:. I ~
e! oti
Hi Hi
j i
~
lii~ i I
~
"'''''
czcuw
:3:3
00
~u;lel\l
ooo~
... ..
<<"'......
~~
00
~:I~t
000":
~~
~~~!
~~
is;~~
~~
fl~~~
.......
=~
~=g::l
I::<f;
'-;~~ll:l
... -
;:::::8
;~~l::
~~
~H:; ~ ~
~~
~~~~
i ~J .
i;~-;:!
l~~i J
ti&l.o 0
::8i ..
. JS JS 'i t g ~ ;II' _...l_
J -... f-:t
: ii j& -;cB
& i j
<<
l::;
o
<<
1II
o
~
~
~
<!>
~
!
-
'"
....
~
.!
,..
co
~
o
co
III
<>
~
1? {:)
fli),'} ( ;)
.,~ \- '.'
~ ff'~'"
",:;11l
;i::; ~,
c~o
--'"
0"
~
i
2
~
-
-
-
.l!l
..
t
"
~! :;
"'11':- ..
J~~ f
PI~ ;:;
'g -; ::: Ii I:
a:S-!1::
iJ!!1
N' __ I-
; Ii; f
! ,., -
i!i~~
-;!~fl
i'j -;'tE
.. '5.....
... s.....
Jl~jfi
~ ~,I~~N
it!
;
Ii'
j
o
..
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Tabl e 31-3.
1997 Intersection Analysis.
1997
Existing Background Total Proj ect Tra ffi c
Intersection LOS Traffic LOS Tra ffi c as % of Total
LOS Traffic
Sheraton Driveway - North D
Sheraton Driveway - South D
Gul fview @ Harnden A A B 15.8
Gulfview @ Coronado B C D 15.4
Coronado @ Causeway Blvd. A B B 1.8
Marianne & Mandalay A B B 8.2
Marianne & Poinsettia A A A 3.9
Memorial Csy. @ Island Way C D D 7.7
Gulf Blvd. @ Belleair Csy. B C D 6.2
Gulf Blvd. @ Walsingham C D D 1.6
SSK1:4
31-24
.~
r""~'I~'t
t --]
.. 'r.,~ ..
.........
Wade-Trim
I'
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~ ~
> < > ~
< 1= <
...I :: <
< w 0 ...I
0 en z 0
z z < ~
< 6 ...I ~
~ Q. ~ 0
~ ::
w
a:
Q
MEMORIAL CAUSEWAY
8 CAUSEWAY
@ CORONADO COURT ST.
SHERATON
SAND KEY RESORT
~ Wade-Trim
o Engineering Landscape Architecture
. Planning Environmental Sciences
N
~
fQ\ SHERATON
,,>!:V NORTH DR.
Yi)\ SHERATON
~ SOUTH DR.
BELLEAIR CAUSEWAY
JW
W ALSINGHAM RD.
EXHIBIT
1997 INTERSECTION P.M. PEAK
HOUR LEVELS OF SERVICE
31-8
II
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.~~.
rs~!I~"1
[ _=l
.. ~r..N ...
.-11IIIII.
were performed using no transit beyond the level that
currently exists.
.
Table 31-2A displays the results of the analysis if the
hotel is 100 percent occupied. Based on occupancy
information for the years 1983-1986. the hotel averaged a
yearly occupancy rate of only 73 percent. Table 31-2B
shows the result of an analysis using this occupancy rate.
Table 31-2C provides a summary of this data. Since the
intersections all operated at an acceptable level of
service even when the traffic for 100 percent occupancy
was included. no intersection analysis was performed for
the 73 percent occupied condition.
The intersection analysis was a two-step process. First,
the Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) technique was used to
determine an intersection's LOS with project traffic
included and the percentage of intersection capacity that
the project traffic represented. If the intersection
operated at LOS 0 or worse and if project traffic
represented five percent or more of the capacity, the
intersection was further analyzed using the SICA computer
program. The CMA and SICA worksheets are included as
Appendix B to this report.
Roadway links were analyzed by comparing projected future
directional volumes to the hourly capacity volumes
contained in the Urban Transportation Planning Model
Update - Phase II, Task C. A copy of this table is
included in Appendix B. The level of service is based on
the peak direction of total traffic. which is not
necessarily the peak direction of project traffic.
The Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council requires that a
development's impact be mitigated if the project traffic
is equivalent to five percent or more of the peak hour LOS
o capacity of the roadway facility and if the facility is
operating at an unacceptable level-of-service. At those
locations that exceed the TBRPC thresholds. improvements
are listed that will return the facility's level-of-
service to what is deemed acceptable by the TBRPC.
The link analysis indicated that the following roadway may
require improvement:
o Gulf Boulevard from Walsingham to Park - This roadway
should be widened to a three-lane section. This section.
of roadway will be improved as part of the recently
advertised PO & E study to be conducted by Pinellas
County under the auspices of the FOOT.
31-26
.
Wade-Trim
I'
I
I
I
I
i I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'I
..~.
r 6':3' I~ ..
[ --]
I. ~r......" ...
..........
The intersection analysis indicated no locations that
require improvement. The intersections that will
operate at LOS 0 were exami ned wi th 1985 Hi ghway
ca~acith Manual analysis techniques and it was found
un er t e more stringent software. that only Gulf and
Walsingham will operate at LOS E. However. project
traffic comprises only 1.6 percent of the capacity at
this location.
The analysis provided in this document is a conservative
estimate of the impact the expansion of the Sheraton
Sand Key will have on the Clearwater area. The
assumptions used that cause the analysis to provide
conservative results include:
o The background traffic was factored to present annual
average volumes. While the FOOT would require
increasing September and October volumes by 12-15
percent to obtain annual average, it was recognized that
traffic at the beach fluctuates more than it does on a
Pinellas County-wide basis. The factors used were based
on count data collected at the Clearwater Pass Toll
-Bridge and increased the raw volumes by over 30 percent.
o The analysis was performed as if the hotel will always
be 100 percent occupied. In fact, over the last four
years, the occupancy rate has average only 73 percent.
Thus, the impact of project traffic on the roadway has
been overstated.
o Traffic from future Sand Key development was included
for the highest possible level of development. It is
not anticipated that this level of development will
occur and the impact of this component of traffic will
be less than stated in this document.
G. WHAT STEPS WILL BE TAKEN IN THE PLANNING AND DESIGN OF THE
DEVELOPMENT TO ACCOMMODATE EXISTING AND PROPOSED PUBLIC TRANSIT
SYSTEMS? REFER TO INTERNAL DESIGN, SITE PlANNING, PARKING
PROVISIONS, LOCATIONS, ETC. WHAT PROVISIONS WILL BE MADE FOR
THE MOVEMENT OF PEOPLE BY MEANS OTHER THAN PRIVATE AUTOMOBILE?
(1) WHAT STEPS WILL BE TAKEN IN THE PLANNING AND DESIGN OF THE
DEVELOPMENT TO EXPAND EXISTING AND PROPOSED PUBLIC TRANSIT
SYSTEMS? ALSO, WHAT FACILITIES, SERVICES, AND/OR
CONSTRAINTS WILL BE PROVIDED ON-SITE TO FOSTER UTILIZATION
OF MASS TRANSIT? REFER TO INTERNAL DESIGN, SITE PLANNING,
PARKING PROVISION. LOCATION, ETC.
Public transit is not currently heavily used as a means to
access the Sheraton Sand Key and. by not including it in'
this document. a conservative analysis was provided.
.
31-27
Wade-Trim
II
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.~.
r "'3~' I" '1
r - '=2
.. ~i...5 ...
.~
SSKl-22
Design considerations will be made for the continued
operation of commercial shuttle vehicles and the
Clearwater Beach trolley. No special consideration will
be made for PSTA buses beyond what is comparable to the
current situation.
Wade-Trim
31-28
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.~.
r~~'
..~~..
....-11IIIII.
32. HOUSING: PROVISION OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS
A. PROVIDE A BREAKDOWN OF THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF RESIDENTIAL
UNITS BY PRICE OR RENTAL RANGE, TYPE OF UNIT 9E.G., SINGLE-
FAMILY DETACHED, GARDEN APARTMENT, TOWNHOUSE, MOBILE HOME,
ETC.) AND NUMBER OF BEDROOMS. (IF THE APPLICANT DOES NOT
INTEND TO CONSTRUCT THE UNITS, ESTIMATE THE INFORMATION.) USE
THE FORMAT BELOW FOR EACH PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT.
B. WHAT NUMBER AND PERCENT OF LOTS WILL BE SOLD WITHOUT CONSTRUCT-
ED DWELLING UNITS? WHAT IS THE EXTENT OF IMPROVEMENTS TO BE
MADE ON THESE LOTS PRIOR TO SALE?
C. WHAT WILL BE THE -TARGET GROUp. FOR THE MARKETING EFFORT FOR
RESIDENTIAL UNITS AND LOTS? BREAK DOWN BY NUMBER, PER CENT AND
TYPE THE DWELLING UNITS TO BE MARKETED FOR RETIRED PERSONS,
FAMILIES, SINGLES, ETC. WHAT PORTION WILL BE MARKETED AS
SECOND OR VACATION HOMES?
D. HOW WILL THE MARKETING EFFORT FOR RESIDENTIAL UNITS AND LOTS BE
DISTRIBUTED: 1) WITHIN THE REGION, 2} WITHIN THE STATE, OR 3)
OUTSIDE THE STATE?
E. IS THE DEVELOPMENT REGISTERED OR WILL REGISTRATION BE REQUIRED
WITH THE DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES UNDER CHAPTER 478,
FLORIDA STATUTES? WILL THE DEVELOPMENT BE REGISTERED WITH THE
H.U.D., OFFICE OF INTERSTATE LAND SALES REGISTRATION OR WITH
OTHER STATES.
F. WHAT ARE THE NET AND GROSS RESIDENTIAL DENSITIES FOR THE
OVERALL PROJECT AND FOR EACH DEVELOPMENT PHASE AS SHOWN ON THE
PROPOSED MASTER PLAN? (MAP H)
As approved at the October 26, 1987 TBRPC Pre-Application
Conference, no response to Question 32 is required.
SSKl-23
32-1
Wade-Trim
II
II
I
I I
,
II
I
I
; I
I ,
I
I I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
z
o
~
E-4
<
~
~
o
~
z
~
~
~
~
u
~
~
~
u
~
~
00
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Appendix A
Selected Data From Clearwater Harbor/St. Joseph Sound
Intensive Survey Documentation
Water Quality Technical Series
Volume 1 Number 89
FDER Bureau of Water Quality Management
Water Quality Analysis Section - April 1987
~I
~
~.
~
~
-
,
~
I~
~
~
I~
~
~
~
~
>'G)
a. ...
o .t~
U f~
1';1>';,71
.. '~
en ,~
at >
mC
o
(,)
X
l&I
:IE
l&..
o
l&..
-oJ
:3
<:)
2.
~
.'
.'
\;. AIlC2.0n
-. CC'T
. .
.1
.3..
4
.
8.
5
.
l'"~~.r,...::
\; .
-.- ..
..:'.;,,;:,..
oeOORAPHIC LOCATION OF WATER OUALITY S",MP{.INC STATIONS.
o
':t:.
'='
o
en
NO..a-lllloo"
IS.
NUIIIIICoUl( ""ss ~9
LO..(
OAK "T.
10
.
...
~i~(:~
..'
.I:
:C..
.;a~
;~
!~
.,. .
;.Jt 2 2
.:;1,
:....re
~
-.:;..-
~~ .".
." ~.!' '.:0
'-i.# .- n
. .~
~~
a.EAAWA~
.-
tlil
'~~.:.-:..i:
L,.f.It40
o
I
ST"T''''C
.
~
CM
I'
II Clearwater Harbor
I. StatIon <4-
9
I 8
II -
,
GI
E 7
-
U
c
I 0
u
0
Q S
c
0
.
I ~
tS
II
<4-
I Nov-83 Jon-8<4- Lear-8<4- Leay-8<4- JuJ-84
Survey date
I
,I Clearwater Harbor
StatIon <4-
38
, I 34
I 32
I I 30
- 28
u
-
I ! 28
:J
-
e 2<4-
.
Go 22
E
I .
- 20
c
0
. 18
~
I 18
14
12
I 10
Nov-83 Jon-84 Lear-84 Leay-84 JuJ-84
I Survey dot.
I
I'
I
Clearwater Harbor
I Station 4
40
38
I 35
34
32
I - 30
..
Q.
Q. 28
-
];0 25
S
I a 24
.
c 22
0
II
2 20
I 18
15
I 14
12
10
I Nov-83 Jan-84 Llar-84 Llay-84 Jut-84
Survey date
I
I Clearwater Harbor
Station 4
I 8.0
8.8
8.5
I 8.4
8.2
8.0
I -
;:, 7.8
.
-
:z: 7.5
Q.
c 7.4
I 0
. 7.2
2
7.0
8.8
I 8.8
8.4
I 8.2
8.0
Nov-53 Jan-&4 Llar-&4 Llay-&4 Jut-&4
I Sul'Ye)' date
I
I'
I
Clearwater Harbor
I Station 4
2.8
2.4
I 2.2
- 2.0
~
I S 1.8
d 1.8
i
u 1.4
I. Z
u 1.2
C
0 1.0
e'
0
I c 0.8
0
. 0.8
:2
0.4
I 0.2
0.0
I Nov-83 Jon-84 "'0r-84 "'ay-84 Jul-84
Survey dot.
I
I Clearwater Harbor
Station 4
140
I
130
I -
~ 120
.
I ::J
-
b
C 110
=
0
.x
I G
c
0 100
.
:2
I gO
I 80
Nov-83 Jan-84 "'0r-84 Lfay-84 Jul-84
I Survey date
I
II
I
Clearwater Harbor
I. Station 4
8
I 8
I -
, ...
Ql
e
-
ltJ
I. e 3
0
CD
U
c
a
. 2
I :2
I
0
I Nov-B3 Jan-B4 ..a,.....M "ay-B4 Jut-B4
Survey date
I
I Clearwater Harbor
Station 4
I 10
a
I B
- 7
,
Ql
I e s
-
0
N
0 8
0
I CD
u ...
c
a
.
:2 3
I 2
I 0
Nov-83 Jan-B4 ..a,.....S4 "ay-M Jul-B4
I Survey date
I
I'
I
Clearwater H a rb 0 r
I 0.04- Station 4
I 0.04
-
, 0.03
0-
I E
- 0.03
c.i
c
0
u 0.02
I. Q.
0 .-
J: r:
't= 0.02
0
I c
0
. 0.01
::E
I 0.0.1
0.00
I Nov-83 Jon-84 "or-84 "ay-84 Jul-84-
Survey date
I
I Clearwater Harbor
Station 4
0.20
I 0.19
0.18
0.17
I O.HS
- 0.1 !5
~ 0.14
E 0.13
-
I d 0.12
c 0.11
0
u 0.10
Q. 0.08
I a 0.08
-
0
- 0.07
c
0 0.08
.
I ::I 0.05
0.04
0.03
0.02
I 0.01
0.00
Nov-B3 Jan-B4 "ar-B4 "ay-B4 Jul-B4
I Survey date
I
I
I
I Clearwater Harbor
Station 4
0.07
I 0.08
-
"- o.o~
I at
E
-
U
c 0.04
0
I u
Z
I 0.03
,.,
:z:
z
I c
0 0.02
.
::I
I 0.01
0.00
I Nov-S3 Jan-S4 Uar-S4 Uay-S4 Jul-M
Survey date
I
I Clearwater Harbor
Station 4
I 0.07
0.08
I -
"-
at
E o.o~
-
ci
I c
0
u 0.04
Z
I
,.,
I 0 0.03
Z
+
N
0
z 0.02
c
I 0
.
::I
0.01
I 0.00
N0v-83 Jan-M Uar-M Uay-a4 Jul-M
I Survey date
I
r
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
o
u
I
-
Q.
-
..
o
a
u
c
G
.
2
10
9
8
7
8
~
...
3
2
Clearwater Harbor
StatIon ...
o
Nov-83
Jon-8"" .
Mar-a"" May-8""
Survey date
Jul-8""
r
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
"-
at
E
-
ci
c
o
u
Clearwater Harbor
Station 1 3
9
s
7
g
s
c
a
.
:z
s
4
Nov-53
Jan-8'"
Mar-84 M~8'"
Su~ date
Jul-84
Clearwater Harbor
Station 13
g
-
:~
32
301
281
28
2...
22
20
!
~
..
e
t
j
c
a
.
:I
181
181
::J
N0v-83
Jon-M
.
Uor-84 M~M
Su~ date
Jul-M
II
I
I. Clearwater Harbor
9.0 Station 1 3
II 8.S j
8.8
8.....
8.2
'I 8.0
-
~ 7.8
.
-
I ~ 7.8
Go
c 7.....
0
. 7.2
::I
I 7.0
8.8
8.8
I 8.....
8.2
I 8.0
Nov-83 Jan-S.... \.Cor-8.... \.Cay-S.... Jul-84
Survey dot.
I
I Clearwater Harbor
I Station 13
<40
38
38 .
I 34-
32
I ~ 30
Go
Go 28
-
~ 28
.5
I "i 2....
.
c :~
a
.
::I
I 18..1
.1
1....
I 12
10
Ncw-83 Jon-84 \.Cor-84 Uay-84 JuI-84 .
I Surwy date
I
I'
I
I Clearwater Harbor
Station 13
2.60
I 2.40
2.20
- 2.00
I ~
e 1.210
-
U 1.60
c
0
I u 1.40
Z
u 1.20
C
0 1.00
I e-
o
c 0.80
a
. 0.80
::E
I 0.40
0.20
I 0.00
Nov-83 Jon-84 t.tor-84 t.tay-84 Jul-84
Survey date
I
I Clearwater Harbor
I Station 13
140
I 130
-
I ~ 120
.
~
b
C 110
I I:
a
.Jl:
"i
c , 00 -;
a
.
I ::E I
,
i
I 901
80
Nov-83 Jan-84 t.tar-84 Uay-84 JuI-84
I Survey date
I
I'
I
I Clearwater Harbor
Station 13
8
I s
I -
~ ...
e
-
I 11)
0 3
0
III
CJ
c
I 0
. 2
:l
I
0
I Nav-83 Jan-M Uar-M Uay-M Jul-84
Survey date
I
I Clearwater Harbor
Statlan 13
I 10
8
I 8
- 7
I ~
oS ..
0
cot 5
2
I
CJ ...
c
a
.
2 3
I 2
I 0
Nav-83 Jan-M Uar-M Uay-84 JuI-84
I Surtey date
I
II
I
I Clearwater Harbor
Station 13
0.040
I o.o~
I ~ 0.030
E
"": 0.02S
u
c
0
I u
Q. 0.020
0
.c
1: 0.015
0
I c
D
. 0.010
2
I 0.005
0.000
I Hov-83 Jan-M Uar-M Uay-M Jul-M
Survey date
I
I Clearwater Harbor
Station 13
I 0.20
0.18
0.18
0.17 .
I 0.11
- 0.15
"
Dl 0.14
E 0.13
I -
d 0.12
c 0.11
0
u 0.10
Q.
I 'i O.ca
~ 0.08
0
~ 0.07
c 0.01
0
I .
2 O.OD
0.04
0.03
0.02
I 0.01
0.00
H0v-83 Jan-M Uar-M Uay-&4 Jul-&4
I Survey date
I
I'
I Clearwater Harbor
0.07 Station 13
I
0.08
I ~ 0.05
I ,g
U 0.0<4>
&
u
Z
I I I 0.03
'"
i
c
0 0.02
I .
:I
0.01
I 0.00
Ncw-83 Jan-84 Lfa,....84 Lfay-84 Jul-84
I Surwy date
I
I Clearwater Harbor
Station 13
0.07
I
0.08
I -
~
,g 0.05
U
I & 0.04
u
Z
I
I a 0.03
Z
+
S
I Z'o.02
c
0
.
:I
0.01
I 0.00
Ncw-83 Jcm-84 Lfar-&4 Lfay-84 JuI-84
I Surwy dat.
I
-
I'
I Clearwater Harbor
Station 13
30
28
I 28
- 24
"-
-at 22
I :I
-
d 20
e
0 18
u
I 0 11
1- 14
Q.
e 12
I 0
:c 10
u
e 8
0
.
I :2 I
...
2
I 0
NOY-83 Jan-84 Ua,...84 Uay-84 _ J.ut-84
Survey date
I
I
I Clearwater Harbor
Station 13
2.8
2A
, I 2.2
-
~ 2.0
I :I 1.8
-
d
i 1.1
u
! I } 1.4
1.2
Go
0
. 1.0
0
I i. a.a
e
a-
. 0.1
:2
I 0.4
0.2
I a.a
N0Y-83 Jar. 84 AI...... Uay-.84 Jut-84
Surwy date
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
10
9
II
~ 7
u
~ e
-
.. 5
0
'0
u
c ..
0
.
:I 3
2
1
0
New-53 . Jan-84
Clearwater Hqrbor
Station 13
Uar-84 Uay-84
Survey date
Jul-84
.
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIX B
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIX B
1985 Highway Capacity Manual Analysis
for Unsignalized Intersections
Wade Trim Inc. Critical Movement Analysis
S.I.C.A.P. - Version 3.2 - 2/87
Location: Walsingham and Gulf Boulevard
Recomnended Base Capacities
UTPS Hourly Intersection Capacities in Vehicles/Hour/Lane
I'
17 ': t)4 : 22
I
11-05-1987
1985 H~gh~~y C~p~~~ty M~~~~1 A~~1y~~~
f~~ U~~~g~~1~~~d X~t~~~~~t~~~~
I
I 'll-r'1:; ~ -r-- s. ~ ~ -t; :i -=-"-r Co f =
GULF BLVD. .AND NORTH DRIVE
I
I
I
I
NL= 2 478 ='...'2----}
I
I
128 =',J3----V
(I :>
. .
I I
. ,
I I
, ,
1 J
I I
vt ~9
74 97
-----------------~
.
I
.
.
j
I
.
I
I
,
I
i
,
,
,
,
I
NL= 2
I
I
NORTH DRIVE
I
I
I,
I
I
Date of Cou~~s: 1997
Time of Cou~~s: PM PEAK
P'".eva i 1 i ....,g Speed: 30
Type cd' Traffic:: CoY,~rol::
.
STOP
Vo 1 ,-,me
Moverne'C",1; i....,
Nurnbe'"" pc::ph
Ac::t '..la 1
Capac::i~y
pc:: ph
Sr,al""ed
Caoac-i~y
pc-ph
Rese.....ved
Capac-i~y
pc-ph
GULF BLVD.
(------ V5= 461 NL= 2
V------ V4= 43
:-----------------
,
I
I
.
i STOP
I
,
I
I
I
,
.
,
J
I
,
I
.
LOS
-----------------------------------------------------
4
7
9
47
81
106
63S
201
683
635
201
683
S8a
120
576
I
I
I
A
D
A
_I'
I
17:05::59
11-05-1987
I
1985 H~gh~~y C~p~~~~y M~~~~1 A~~1y~~~
f~~ U~~~g~~1~z~d X~~~~~~~~~~~~
J: Y". t f:15:' ___ S. ~ ~ t :i. c...... .=. f =
GULF BLVD_ AND SOUTH DRIVE
I
I
GULF BLVD.
I
I
II
I
(------ V5= 406 NL= 2
'tJ------ V4= 32
NL= 2 575 =V2----}
'37 ='.}3----V
-----------------:
(l l>
, ,
: :
. I
. .
I J
. I
. ,
. I
'tJ7 V'3
55 74
:-----------------
I
STOP
I
NL= a
SOUTH DRIVE
I
I
I
I
I
Oat e of COt.H",t s : 1997
Time of COl..ll"lt s:: PM PEAK
Prevailing Speed: 30
Type t;,.f Traffic COl"ft.""c.l:: STOP
Vo il.une Actual Shared Reserved
Mc.vernel",t i"(, Capacity Capacity Capacity LOS
Number pcph pc-ph pcph pcph
---------------------------~-------------------------
4 35 5Sa 5Se 553 A
7 60 1'38 1'38 138 0
'3 81 622 622 541 A
I
I
I
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I LEFT
THRU
I RI6HT
I
I
I
I
IIADE TRI" INC
CRITICAL "OVE"ENT ANALYSIS
FILE NA"E/CO""ENT: SHERATON DRI
6ULFYIEW @ HA"DEH
DATE: 1987
fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
LEVEL OF SERVICE A
SATURATION 371
CRITICAL HIS VOL 520
CRITICAL EIW VOL 119
CRITICAL SU" 639
fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
LANE
NORTHBOUND
"OV WIDTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
RT.
12.0
12.0
L..
....
NORTHBOUND
7
321
73
TRUCKS (z)
1
1
1
1
NORTHBOUND
SOUTHBOUND
EASTBOUND
IlESTBOUND
PHASIN6
IIESTBOUHD
"OV IIIDTH
RL.
12.0
.. .
....
....
IIESTBOUND
19
439
21
o
o
o
101
8
20
LOCAL BUSES (1/HRl
1
1
1
1
PEAK HOUR FACTOR
.9
.9
.9
.9
HIS : 1.
E/II :3.
PEDESTRIAN ACTIYITY: 1.
CYClE LEN6TH : 80 SECONDS
NEITHER TURN PROTECTED
BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (NO OVERLAPl
o - 99 (IPEDS/HR)
CRITICAL LANE VOLU"ES BY "OV~ENT
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND IIESTBOUND
520 0 0
42 0 119
lEFT TURN CHECK
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND IIESTBOUND
19 0 101
42 0 119
75 0 0
OK NIA NIA
NORTHBOUND
I J -RI6HT 445
.EFT 15
I NORTHBOUND
INPlJT VOLU"E 7
liSTED VOL 15
'ACUY 0
"OVErlENT NO
I
<:.~
." \:~;, ,,'
~, '~-
~~~ ~. '.
~~
~~ ~~:~
~~
I'
I
I
I
I
I~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MADE TRI" INC
CRITICAL "OVEftENT ANALYSIS
FILE NA"E/COftftENT: SHERATON DRI
6ULFVIEM I HA"DEN
DATE: 1997 BACKGROUND
Iliflllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
LEVEL OF SERVICE A
SATURATION 451
CRITICAL NIS VOL 633
CRITICAL ElM VOL 146
CRITICAl SUft n9
Iliftliflliflllllliflllllifllllllllll
~
~~
" ~c't
~~ ~
"0
~~
&
LANE GEMTRY
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND IIESTBOUND
LANE ftOV MIDTH IUJV IIIDTH "OV IIIDTH "OV MIDTH
1 RT. o 12.0 RT. 12.0 .... RL 12.0
2 L.. 12.0 L.. 12.0
3
4 . ..
5 ... .
6 ....
TRAFFIC VOlU"ES
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND IIESTBoUND
LEFT 7 21 0 124
THRU 438 537 0 22
RIGHT 101 24 0 22
TRUCKS (II LOCAL BUSES (./HRI PEAK HOUR FACTOR
NORTHBOUND 1 1 .9
SDUTHBOUND 1 1 .9
EASTBOUND 1 1 .9
IIESTBoUND 1 1 .9
NIS :1.
EIII : 3.
PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY: 1.
CYClE LENGTH : 80 SECONDS
NEITHER TURN PROTECTED
BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (NO OVERLAP)
o - 99 (.PEDS/HR)
PHASING
I J -RIGHT NORTHBOUND
608
LEFT 15
I
NORTHBOUND
lIT VOLU"E 7
llSTED VOL 15
CAPACITY 0
l'EftENT NO
CRITICAL LANE VOLU"ES BY IUJVE"EMT
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND IIESTBOUND
633 0 0
47 0 146
lEFT TURN CHECK
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND IIESTBOUND
21 0 124
47 0 146
2S 0 0
NO MIA NIA
I'
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
IlADE TRUI INC
CRITICAL 1l0VEKENT ANALYSIS
FILE NAIlE/COIlIlENT: SHERATON DRI
GULFVIEIl @ HAIlDEN
DATE: 1997 TOTAL TRAFFIC
..tI.................................
LEVEl OF SERVICE B
SATURATION 601
CRITICAL NIS VOL 885
CRITICAl EIIl VOL 146
CRITICAL SUIl 1031
.,",...........,....................
LANE 6EOllETRY
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND IlESTBOUND
LANE 1l0V:IlIDTH 1l0V WIDTH 1l0V IIIDTH IlOV IlIDTH
1 RT. 12.0 RT. 12.0 RL. 12.0
2 L.. 12.0 L.. 12.0
3 ....
4
5 ....
6 ...
TRAFFIC VOLUIlES
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND IIESTBOUND
LEFT 7 21 0 124
THRU 543 762 0 22
RIGHT 125 24 0 22
TRUCKS (I) LOCAL BUSES (I/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR
NORTHBOUND 1 1 .9
SOUTHBOUND 1 1 .9
EASTBOUND 1 1 .9
IIESTBOUND 1 . 1 .9
~
I,....
l! .c",
f). t . .
, """
g.
.
~~. , '
(..'
t
t ')
....,1 .
V' ~
~ :.q!!
&vt.
PHASING
NEITHER TURN PROTECTED
BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (NO OVERLAP)
o - 99 (IPEDS/HR)
NIS :1.
Ell :3.
PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY: 1.
CYClE LENGTH : 80 SECONDS
CRITICAl LANE VOlU"ES BY ItOVEIBT
.'''U -RIGHT
. LEFT
NORtHBOUND
753
31
SOUTHBOUND. .
885
94
EASTBOUND
o
o
IlESTBOUND
o
146
LEFT TURN CHECK
I NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND IIESTBOUND
INPUT VOLUKE 7 21 0 124
I USTED VOL 31 94 0 146
PACITY 0 132 0 0
1l0VEIlENT NO OK NIA NIA
I
I'
I
I
I
I I
I.
1
I
I
I
I
i I
I
I
I
WADE TRI" INC
CRITICAL "OVE"ENT ANALYSIS
FILE NA"E/CO""EHT: SHERATON DRI
CORONADO I GULFVIEW
DATE: 1987
ttttttttttJltttttttttttttttfttttttttt
LEYEL OF SERYICE B
SATURATION 611
CRITICAL HIS VOL 591
CRITICAL E/W VOL 459
CRITICAL SU" 1050
fttttttftftJlttttttJlttttttfJlttJltft
LANE GEOI1ETRY
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
LANE "OV WIDTH "OV WIDTH "OY WIDTH "OV WIDTH
1 Too 12.0 RT. 12.0 Loo 12.0 /
. ..
2 LT. 12.0 Too 12.0 L. . . 12.0 $
3 . ..
4 II ~t\
5 ....
6 .... U..,.
/ \'C'
TRAFFIC VOlUItES ~~
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND \0
LEFT 1
0 743 0 ~~
THRU 48S 288 0 0
RIGHT 0 748 ~;) 0
TRUCKS (I) LOCAL BUSES ('/HRI ~ PEAK HOUR FACTOR
NORTHBOUND 1 1 .9
SOUTHBOUND 1 1 .9
EASTBOUND 1 1 .9
WESTBOUND 1 1 .9
PHASING NIS : 1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED
ElM :2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED
PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY: 1. 0 - 99 ('PEDS/HRI
CYClE LENGTH : SO SECONDS
NORTHBOUND
I U -RIGHT 292
LEFT 0
I NORTHBOUND
INPUT YOLU"E 1
lUSTED VOL 6
PACITY 0
"OVE"ENT NO
I
CRITICAL LANE VOlU"ES BY ItOYEIBT
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
591 0 0
0 459 0
LEFT TURN CHECK
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
0 743 0
0 S7S 0
299 0 459
OK NIA OK
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
WADE TRIK IHe
CRITICAL KOVEKENT ANALYSIS
FILE NAKE/CO""ENT: SHERATON DRI
CORONADO I 6ULFVIEW
DATE: 1997 BACK6ROUND
fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
LEVEL OF SERVICE C
SATURATION 711
CRITICAl NIS VOL 664
CRITICAL E/W VOl 560
CRITICAl SUK 1224
tffffffffftffffffflffftffffftftffffff
NORTHBOUND
LANE KOV WIDTH
1 T.. 12.0
2 LT. 12.0
3
4 ....
5
6
NORTHBOUND
LEn 2
THRU 562
RI6HT 0
TRUCKS (I)
NORTHBOUND 1
SOUTHBOUND 1
EASTBOUND 1
lfESTBDUHD 1
lANE 6EOlaRY
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND
KOV WIDTH KOV IIIDTH
RT. 12.0 L.. 12.0
T.. 12.0 L.. 12.0
....
....
....
....
TRAFFIC VOLUKES
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND
IIESTBOUND
KOV IIIDTH
...
...
WESTBOUND
.
"0
~ ~,
it
~f(\
~ 0
~iO,
G ~-"
o
320
B45
906
o
t1
o
o
o
LOCAL BUSES (I/HR)
1
1
1
1
PEAK HOUR FACTOR
.9
.9
.9
.9
PHASIN6 NIS :1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED
E/W :2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED
PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY: 1. 0 - 99 (IPEDS/HR)
CYCLE LENGTH : BO SECONDS
I U -RI6HT
LEFT
NORTHBOUND
339
o
I
CRITICAL LAME VOlUKES BY KOVE"ENT
SOUTHBOUND
664
o
EASTBOUND
o
560
WESTBOUND
o
o
lEFT TURN CHECK
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND IIESTBOUND
I UT VOLUKE 2 0 906 0
OSTED VOL 13 0 1067 0
CAPACITY 0 325 0 560
Imt~T NO OK NIA OK
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I
I
I
I
MADE TRIK INC
CRITICAL KOVEKENT ANALYSIS
FILE NAKE/COK"ENT: SHERATON DRI\
CORONADO @ 6ULFVIEM
DATE: 1997 TOTAL TRAFFIC
Itttttttttlttttttltt..ttttttttttttttt
LEVEL OF SERVICE D
SATURATION 861
CRITICAL NIS VOL 784
CRITICAL ElM VOL 687
CRITICAL S~ 1471
ttttttttttttttttltttl..t..tttt....ttl
NORTHBOUND
LANE KOV MIDTH
1
2
3
4
5
"
Too 12.0
LT. 12.0
....
NORTHBOUND
LEFT
THRU
RIGHT
2
586
o
NORTHBOUND
SOUTHBOUND
EASTBOUND
MESTBOUND
TRUCKS (I)
1
1
1
1
LANE 6EOttETRY
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND
KOV MIDTH KOY MIDTH
RT. 12.0 Loo 12.0
T.. 12.0 Loo 12.0
. .. .... ....
... . .. . .-.. .
... .... ....
.... .. .
TRAFFIC YOLUKES
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND
lfESTBOUND
KOY MIDTH
~~..
.A . 'i~.
~ir~ "',;, I~
, .~~1'" . 'i,rUt. ~
"i' ..," .0'
.' .~' '. ~ ;
f}.,~ ·
t--_.,-....
.~ ~
MESTBOUND
o
320
1058
1111
o
.$3
o
o
o
LOCAL BUSES (I/HR)
1
1
1
1
PEAK HOUR FACTOR
.9
.9
.9
.9
PHASIN6 NIS :1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED
ElM :2. HEAYIEST TURN PROTECTED
PEDESTRIAN ACTIYITY: 1. 0 - 99 (IPEDS/HR)
CYClE LEN6TH : 80 SECONDS
I U -RIGHT NORTHBOUND
354
LEFT 0
I
NORTHBOUND
I UT YOlUKE 2
USTED VOL 13
CAPACITY 0
I. ~EKENT NO
CRITICAL LANE. VOlUtlES BY ItOVEKENT
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND lfESTBOUND
784 0 0
0 687 0
lEFT TURN CHECK
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND MESTBOUND
0 1111 0
0 1309 0
430 0 687
OK NIA OK
I'
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
S.I.C.A.P. - VERSION 3.2 - 2~B7
LOCATION: CORONADO J~ GULF',,"IEW
DATE: 11-09-1987
(PAGE 1 OF
PER IOD: ~'M PEAK
VOLUMES ===============: NORTH SOUTH EAST WEST
LEFT TURN VOLUME (VPH> : 2 0 1111 0
THRU ',,'OLUME ('.,"P~-i> ~ 586 32() (} 0
RIGHT TURN VOL. ('.,"PH} : 0 1058 0 0
PEDESTRIAN \lOL. ( PPH > : 0 (> 0 0
VEHICULAR VOLUME e,,'PH} : 5Sa 1378 1111 0
DEtlfAND ADJUSTMENT =================================
PARKING MANEU'.JERS (~* l H) : f) ~) 0 0
LANE UTILIZATION(Xl00}; 100 100 100 10()
ARRIVAL TYPE (Xl0): 30 3~) 30 30
PEAK HOUR FACTOR '\ Xl 00> ; gO '30 gO 90
PROT. RIGHT TURNS (i~) : 0 0 0 0
LOCAL BUSES ('#/H}: 1 1 1 0
HEAVY VEHICLES (,,) : 1 1 1 0
APPROACH GRADE (i<o> ; 0 0 0 0
AREA TYPE: NON-BUSINESS DISTRICT
COto,fTROL DATA =======================================
MIN. THRU GREEN (SEC}:
MIN. LEFT GREEN (SEC};
APPROACH SPEED (MPH) :
SNEAKERS (Xl0/CYCLE};
LANE WIDTH #1 (FT) :
LANE WIDTH #2 (FT>:
LANE WIDTH #3 (FT}:
LANE WIDTH 41-4 (FT}:
LANE WIDTH #5 ( FT} :
L.ANE WIDTH #6 (FT}:
CONTROLLER TYPE:
OPPOS I NG VOLUfl\E COtlJPOS I T ION:
EAST-WEST PHASING:
NORTH-SOUTH PHASING:
APPROACH GROUP
DESCRIPTION
NORTHBOUND
2
ALL "MO'"IEMENTS
SOUTHBOUND
2
ALL J'tl0'.lEMENTS
EASTBOUND
2
ALL. MO....EMENTS
. WESTBOUND
2
ALL MO"iEMENTS
t) 0 t) t)
,", 0 0 0
'-'
25 25 25 a~
20 2() 20 20
12 12 :12 0
12 12 12 0
~) 0 \') 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
NIS = PRETIMED, ElW - PRETIMED
THRU & RIGHT MOVEMENTCS>
NEITHER TURN PROTECTED
NEITHER TURN PROTECTED
TURN DESCRIPTION
LEFT: SHARED, PERM.
RIGHT~ NOT APPLICABLE
LEFT: NOT APPLICABLE
RIGHT: SHARED, PERM.
LEFT: PED. FRICTION ONLY
RiGHT: NOT APPLICABLE
LEFT: NOT APPLICABLE
RIGHT: NOT APPLICABLE
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
S. I. C. A. P. - VERSION 3 OJ - 2/87 DATE: 11-0'3-1'387 <PAGE 2 OF
. ~
LOCATION-: CORONADO }:!' GULPl I EW PERIOD: PM PEAK
DEMAND/SUPPL't' NORTH SOUTH EAST WEST
TA8LE GP#l GPit2 GP#3 GP#l GP#2 GP#3 GP#l GP#2 GP#3 GP,,*l GP#2
VOLUME: 0 653 0 0 1531 0 0 1234 () 0 0
SAT. FLOW: (> 2-3S2 0 (> 3164 (> 0 .303'3 0 I"' ()
~7
FLOW RATIO: O. O(} 0.22 0.00 o. t)O 0.48 0.00 O. (h") 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.00
CAPACITY: (> 1487 0 0 1573 (> (> 1268 (> 0 (>
"lOL. ICAP. . 0.00 O. ".4 0.00 0.00 0.'37 o. Ot) 0.00 \"). '37 O. t)t) 0.00 O. (H)
.
GREEN TIr-1ElMO'.lEMENT <SEC>
AVAILABLE: 0.0 37.8 0.0 0.'0 37.8 0.0 0.0 3.~ .~ 0.0 0.0 0.0
~. ~
REQUIRED: 0.0 13.7 0.0 0.0 30.8 o. t) 0.'0 25.0 t). t) 0.0 ~'). 0
tllEASURES OF EFFECT I ',,'ENESS
OELAY (SEC > : t) '3 {) (> 26 (> (> 30 \."') 0 (>
QUEUE <FT> . 0 7>'. 0 t) 365 0 0 315 0 t) 0
.
STOPS <~.,>: (> 48 (> \.) 73 0 (> 76 (> 0 -0
2 PHASE OPERAT!ON
NB &- sa GREEN
EB & WB GREEN
<SEC} <,,>
37.8 54.0
32.2 46.0
LOST TIME/PHASE:
l'OTAL LOST T I ME:
CYCLE LENGTH:
ALL REO Tn1E:
FLOW RATIO:
DEGREE OF SAT. :
3. () SEC
6.0 SEC
70.0 SEC
0.0 SEe
$.). 8'3
0.97
========~=========================================================
LEFT TURN CHECK
NB
SEt
EB
WEt
'VOLUME:
PROTECTION <P~OTlPERM):
PERMITTEO CAPACITY:
PROTECTED CAPACITY:
EXCESS LEFT TURNS:
==================================~===============================
S'(STEM PERFORMANCE
LE'....EL OF DELAY DELAY FUEL STOPPED COST
APPROACH SER'vICE (SEC) (HRS) (GAL>. '.JEH I CLES ('$ )
NORTHBOUND B 8.7 2.0 3.2 311 16
SOUTHBOUND 0 25.8 14.2 15.6 1116 81
EASTBOUND D 2'3.8 13.3 13.9 '342 73
WESTBOUND A 0.0 0.0 t).O 0 t-:-'
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
INTERSECTION C 24.0 2'3.6 32.8 236'3 16'3
'\ UN I T '.,'ALUES : '$ .:;. o~:> '$ 1.00 -$ O.O2}
II
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
LANE
1
2
3
4
5
6
(".'LEFT
THRU
I RIGHT
I
I
PHASING
I
I
NORTHBOUND
SOUTHBOUND
EASTBOUND
IlESTBOUND
MADETRIfI INC
CRITICAL flOVEflENT ANALYSIS
FILE NAflE/COKKENT: SHERATON DRI
CAUSEWAY BLVD. @ CORONADO
DATE: 198i
fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffflifff
LEva OF SERVICE A
SATURATION 36%
CRITICAL NIS VOL 601
CRITICAL ElM VOL 0
CRITICAl SUK 601
flifffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff!
NORTHBOUND
flOV MIDTH
LANE GEOflETRY
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND
flOV MIDTH f10V NIDTH
MESTBOUND
f10V MIDTH
Roo 12.0
Roo 12.0
T.. 12.0
Loo 12.0
L.. 12.0
...
A>. .,
~~. ~
1
..
....
... ....
. oo
....
.... ....
NORTHBOUND
TRAFFIC VOlUIlES
SOUTHBOUND
WESTBOUND
EASTBOUND
;~.
0 629 0 0
185 ~ 0 0
871 0 0 0
TRUCKS (I) LOCAL BUSES (./HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR
1 1 .9
1 1 .9
1 1 .9 .
1 1 .9
HIS :5.
ElM :5.
PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY: 1.
CYClE LENGTH : 60 SECONDS
I :U -RIGHT
lEFT
I
.'~UT VOLUflE
. -ISTED VOL
..IlPACITY
"nvEIIENT
I
DIRECTION SEPERATION
DIRECTION SEPERATION
o - 99 ('PEDS/HR)
NORTHBOUND
212
o
CRITICAL LANE VOLUltES BY fIOYEfIENT
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND MESTBOUND
0 0 0
389 0 0
LEFT TURN CHECK
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND IIESTBOUND
629 0 0
741 0 0
0 0 0
NIA . NIA NIA
NORTHBOUND
o
o
o
NIA
r
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
11
I
I
I
I
I
WADE TRln IHC
CRITICAL "OVEnENT ANALYSIS
FILE NAnE/COnnENT: SHERATON DRI
CAUSEWAY BlVD. I CORONADO
DATE: 1997 BACKGROUND
.......fff................f..f......f
lEVEL OF SERVICE B
SATURATION 551
CRITICAL NIS VOL 912
CRITICAL EIW VOL 0
CRITICAL sun 912
ffff'.....ff..ffff..If....f.ff.ff....
LANE 6EOnETRY
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND IIESTBOUND
LANE nov IIIDTH nov If 10TH nov IIIDTH nov IfIDTH
1 Roo 12.0 L. .. 12.0 .... ... .
2 Roo 12.0 Loo 12.0 ....
3 Too 12.0 .... ....
4 ... .
:) .... ....
6 .... .
TRAFFIC VOLUnES
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND IIESTBOUND ~\
LEFT 0 931 0 0 \\ ,'.
THRU 297 tm- 0 0 ~.~ a
RI6HT 1371 0 0 0
TRUCKS (1) LOCAL BUSES (./HRI PEAK HOUR FACTOR ~o
NORTHBOUND 1 1 .9 ,,-a
SOUTHBOUND 1 1 .9
EASTBOUND 1 1 .9
WESTBOUND 1 1 .9
PHASING
MIS :5.
Ell : 5.
PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY: 1.
CYClE lENGTH : 60 SECONDS
I U -RIGHT NORTHBOUND
337
lEFT 0
I
I 'IT VOlunE NORTHBOUND
0
...~USTED VOL 0
CAPACITY 0
I IEI'IEMT MIA
DIRECTION SEPERATION
DIRECTION SEPERATION
o - 99 (IPEDS/HRI
CRITICAL LANE YOLUnES BY.noYEnEMT
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
0 0 0
575 0 0
LEFT TURN CHECK
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND MESTBOUMD
931 0 0
1097 0 0
0 0 0
NIA MIA KIA
~
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
MADE TRI" INC
CRITICAL KOVBKENT ANALYSIS
FILE NAnE/COnnENT: SHERATON DRI
CAUSENAY BLVD. @ CORONADO
DATE: 1997 TOTAL TRAFFIC
fffffffffffffftitiff'ffffff'fftiff'"
LEVEL OF SERVICE B
SATURATION 571
CRITICAl HIS VOL 939
CRITICAl ElM VOL 0
CRITICAl SUK 939
ffffffff'f""f'f'ti'f"'ff"f"'ff'f
NORTHBOUND
LANE noy WIDTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
R.. 12.0
Roo 12.0
Too 12.0
....
NORTHBOUND
LEFT 0
THRU 321
RIGHT 1476
TRUCKS (II
NORTHBOUND 1
SOUTHBOUND 1
EASTBOUND 1
IfESTBOUND 1
PHASING
LANE 6EOnETRY
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND MESTBOUND
noy WIDTH nov WIDTH nov MIDTH
L.. 12.0 ....
L.. 12.0
... . .... ....
... . . oo oo . ....
.... .... .. . ....
oo .
TRAFFIC VOLUnES
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND
NESTBOUND
931
..w;..
o
A}
<Ci' ., ,..'J
.~,''': t
....
~ ,\
~,
o
o
o
o
o
o
LOCAL BUSES (I/HRI
1
1
1
1
PEAK HOUR FACTOR
.9
.9
.9
.9
HIS :5.
EIII : 5.
PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY: 1.
CYQ.E LENGTH : 60 SECONDS
I :U -RIGHT
LEFT
I
I UT VOlUIlE
~ilSTED VOl
CAPACITY
I. ~EltEMT
DIRECTION SEPERATION
DIRECTION SEPERATION
o - 99 (IPEDS/HRI
CRITICAL LANE VOLUnES BY noVEnENT
NORTHBOUND
364
o
NORTHBOUND
o
o
o
MIA
. SOUTHBOUND
o
575
EASTBOUND
o
o
NESTBOUND
o
o
LEFT TURN CHECK
SOUTHBOUND
931
1097
o
MIA
EASTBOUND
o
o
o
MIA
NESTBOUND
o
o
o
MIA
~-.
'J
i'
'~~~4 4};~
~e
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I'
I
LANE
1
2
3
4
5
6
PHASING
"ADE TRllt INC
CRITICAL ItOVEKENT ANALYSIS
FILE NAKE/COKKENT: SHERATON DRI
ItARIANNE @ ItANDALAY
DATE: 1987
fffiffifffffffffffffffffffffffffffiif
lEVEL OF SERYICE A
SATURATION 501
CRITICAL N/S VOL 376
CRITICAL E/M VOL 482
CRITICAL SUIt 858
fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
NORTHBOUND
ItOV "IDTH
Too 12.0
Too 12.0
NORTHBOUND
LANE GEOltETRY
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND
ItOY "IDTH ftOY WIDTH
WESTBOUND
ItOY WIDTH
lEFT 0
THRU 232
RIGHT 0
TRUCKS (I)
NORTHBOUND 1
SOUTHBOUND 1
EASTBOUND 1
IfESTBOUND 1
RT. 12.0
Too 12.0
R.. 12.0
Too 12.0
loo 12.0
loo 12.0
... .
oo .
. oo
....
TRAFFIC VOlUltES
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND
WESTBOUND
o
634
1
o
o
o
747
15
539
LOC~l BUSES ('/HR)
1
1
1
1
PEAK HOUR FACTOR
.9
.9
.9 .
.9
N/S :1.
E/II :3.
PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY: 1.
CYClE LENGTH : 80 SECONDS
.-U -RIGHT
. LEFT
I
INPUT VOLUltE
. USTED YOl
&PACIfY
KOVEKENT
I
NORTHBOUND
139
o
NORTHBOUND
o
o
o
OK
NEITHER TURN PROTECTED
BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (NO OVERLAP)
o - 99 (,PEDS/HR)
CRITICAl lANE VOLUltES BY "OVE"ENT
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND IfESTBOUND
376 0 21
0 0 461
LEFT TURN CHECK
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
0 0 747
0 0 880
237 0 1374
OK NIA NIA
r
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
WADE TRI" INC
CRITICAL "OYE"ENT ANALYSIS
FILE NA"E/CO""ENT: SHERATON DRI
"ARIANNE @ "ANDALAY
DATE: 1997 BACKGROUND
fffffflffflffffffffffffftttfttftttflt
LEVEL OF SERVICE B
SATURATION 581
CRITICAL NIS VOL 425
CRITICAL EIW VOL 564
CRITICAL SU" 989
fffffffffffffffffffffffffffflffffffft
LANE 6EO"ETRY
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
LANE "OY WIDTH "OV IIIDTH "OY IIIDTH "OY IIIDTH
1 T.. 12.0 RT. 12.0 R.. 12.0
2 T.. 12.0 Too 12.0 T.. 12.0
3 L.. 12.0
4 oo . Loo 12.0
5 ....
6
TRAFFIC YOLU"ES
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND IIESTBOUND
LEFT 0 0 0 877
THRU 281 717 0 16
RIGHT 0 1 0 598
TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (I/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR
NORTHBOUND 1 1 .9
SOUTHBOUND 1 1 .9
EASTBOUND 1 1 .9
!fESTBOUND 1 1 .9
NIS :1.
EIII :3.
PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY: 1.
CYCLE LEN6TH : 80 SECONDS
PHASING
NEITHER TURN PROTECTED
BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (NO OVERLAP)
o - 99 (tpEDS/HR)
CRITICAL LANE YOLUttES BY ItOYEtlENT
I ~ -RIGHT
LEFT
NORTHBOUND
167
o
SOUTHBOUND
425
o
EASTBOUND
o
o
IIESTBOUND
22
542
I
LEFT TURN CHECK
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
, I JT YOLUItE 0 0 0 877
JSTED VOL 0 0 0 1033
CAPACITY 0 258 0 1374
1.1E1lENT OK OK NIA MIA
II
I
I
I
I
I
I LANE
I
I
I
LEFT
I THRU
RIGHT
WADE TRI" INC
CRITICAL "OV~ENT ANALYSIS
FILE NA"E/CO""ENT: SHERATON DRI
KARIANHE @ "ANDALAY
DATE: 1997 TOTAL TRAFFIC
1IIIIIIIfff.....I.I.f.I..............
LEVEl OF SERVICE B
SATURATION 651
CRITICAl HIS VOL 432
CRITICAL EIW VOL 688
CRITICAl SU" 1120
1...fIIl.............................
LANE SEOItETRY
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
"OV WIDTH "OV IUDTH "OV NIDTH "OV WIDTH
Too 12.0 RT. 12.0 Roo 12.0
Too 12.0 Too 12.0 Too 12.0
Loo 12.0
... . loo 12.0
.... .... oo . ....
. .. ....
1
2
3
4
5
6
NORTHBOUND
o
305
o
NORTHBOUND
SOUTHBOUND
EASTBOUND
WESTBOUND
TRUCKS (II
1
1
1
1
PHASING
NORTHBOUND
II -RIGHT 182
LEFT - 0
I
NORTHBOUND
I T VOLUItE 0
STED VOL 0
CAPACITY 0
luEJtEMT OK
TRAFFIC VOLU"ES
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND
WESTBOUND
o 0
729 0
1 0
1078
16
598
lOCAl BUSES ('/HR)
1
1
1
1
PEAK HOUR FACTOR
.9
.9
.9
.9
NEITHER TURN PROTECTED
BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (NO OVERLAPI
o - 99 (IPEDS/HR)
CRITICAL LANE VOLU"ES BY ~VEftENT
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND IlESTBOUND
432 0 22
0 0 666
lEFT TURN CHECK
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND IlESTBOUND
0 0 1078
0 0 1270
250 0 1374
OK NIA NIA
I'
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MADE TRI" INC
CRITICAL "OVE"ENT ANALYSIS
FILE NA"E/CO""ENT: SHERATON DRI
"ARIANNE @ POINTSETTIA
DATE: 1987
ffffffffffff...ffffffffffffffffffffff
lEVEL OF SERVICE A
SATURATION 361
CRITICAL NIS VOL 174
CRITICAL ElM VOl 472
CRITICAL SU" 646
fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
LANE GEO"ETRY
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND MESTBOUND
lANE KOV NIDTH KOV MIDTH KOY MIDTH KOV WIDTH
1 LT. 12.0 RT. 12.0 .... RT. 12.0
2 ... . T.. 12.0
3 .... ... . T.. 12.0
4 .... ... . LT. 12.0
5 !' . .. .
6 . .. .... ... ....
TRAFFIC VOLUIES
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND NESTBOUND
LEFT 32 0 0 27
THRU 19 105 0 1292
RIGHT 0 47 0 98
TRUCKS (1) lOCAL BUSES (I/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR
NORTHBOUND 1 1 .9
SOUTHBOUND 1 1 .9
EASTBOUND 1 1 .9
NESTBOUND 1 1 .9
...."
I"': (0
< tt'
....~ ").
.~, ~"
.. Il
r.. IX:'\
t.; ~,
~,' 0
tf~
i~
PHASING NIS : 1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED
ElM :1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED
PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY: 1. 0 - 99 (tPEDS/HR)
CYCLE lENGTH : 80 SECONDS
CRITICAL LANE VOlUKES BY KOVEKENT
NORTHBOUND' SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND NESTBOUND
I J -RIGHT 60 174 0 472
_EFT 0 0 0 0
I lEFT TURN CHECK :
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND NESTBOUND
{J _une 32 0 0 27
JSTED VOL 35 0 0 181
ACHY 0 114 0 472
"OYEJDT NO OK OK OK
I
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'I
I
I
I
I
I
WADE TRIIt INC
CRITICAL ItOVEltENT ANALYSIS
FILE NAltE/COltltENT: SHERATON DRI
ItARIANNE @ POINTSETTIA
DATE: 1997 BACKGROUND
Ifffflffflfffffffffffffffffffffffffff
LEVEL OF SERVICE A
SATURATION 41%
CRITICAL NIS VOl 194
CRITICAL'E/W VOL 538
CRITICAL SU" 732
fffffffflfffffffffflffffffffffffftfff
LANE GEOltETRY
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
LANE ItOV NIDTH /tOV NIDTH "OV NIDTH /tOY NIDTH
1 LT. 12.0 RT. 12.0 RT. 12.0
2 .... T.. 12.0
3 ... . .. . .... T.. 12.0
4 ... . .... LT. 12.0
S ... ... .
6 .... .. .
TRAFFIC VOlUItES
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND IIESTBOUND
LEFT 36 0 0 30
THRU 20 117 0 1480
RIGHT 0 53 0 109
TRUCKS (1) LOCAL BUSES ('/HRJ PEAK HOUR FACTOR
NORTHBOUND 1 1 .9
SOUTHBOUND 1 1 .9
EASTBOUND 1 1 . .9
IIESTBOUND 1 1 .9
PHASING NIS :1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED
EIII :1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED
PEDESTRIAN ACTIYITY: 1. 0 - 99 (IPEDS/HRJ
CYClE LENGTH : 80 SECONDS
CRITICAL LANE YOlU"ES BY ftOYE"ENT
I U -RIGHT
LEFT
NORTHBOUND
lJJ
o
SOUTHBOUND
194
o
EASTBOUND
o
o
IIESTBOUND
538
o
Ii
LEFT TURN CHECK
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND IIESTBOUND
I JT VOLU"E 36 0 0 30
.JSTED VOL 40 0 0 202
CAPACITY 0 128 0 S38
1.IaIENT NO OK OK OK
I'
I
I
I
I
! I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
WADE TRUI INC
CRITICAL tlOVEtlENT ANALYSIS
FILE NAtlE/CO~"ENT: SHERATON DRI
. tlARIANNE I POINTSETTIA
DATE: 1997 TOTAL TRAFFIC
"",ft"""""",ft"ft"ft"'f'ff
LEVEL OF SERVICE A
SATURATION 441
CRITICAL HIS VOL 194
CRITICAL EIW VOL 600
CRITICAL SUtI 794
,ft,.....ft....ft.ft.......f....ft...
LANE GEOtlETRY
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
LANE "OV WIDTH tlOV WIDTH tlOV WIDTH tlOV WIDTH
1 U. 12.0 RT. 12.0 RT. 12.0
2 .... T.. 12.0
3 .. . T.. 12.0
4 LT. 12.0
5 .... ....
6 .... .... . .. ....
TRAFFIC VOLUtlES
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
LEFT 36 0 0 30
THRU 20 117 0 1681
RIGHT 0 53 0 109
TRUCKS (11 LOCAl BUSES (IIHRI PEAK HOUR FACTOR
NORTHBOUND 1 1 .9
SOUTHBOUND 1 1 .9
EASTBOUND 1 1 .9
WESTBOUND 1 1 .9
PHASING N/S : 1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED
ElN : 1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED
PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY: 1. 0 - 99 ('PEDS/HRl
CYClE lENGTH : 80 SECONDS
NORTHBOUND
I J -RIGHT 66
LEFT 0
I
NORTHBOUND
lIT VOLUtlE 36
JSTED VOL 40
CAPACITY 0
,"EIIENT NO
CRITICAL LANE VOLUtlES BY tIOVEtlENT
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
194 0 600
0 0 0
LEFT TURN CHECK
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND NESTBOUND
0 0 30
0 0 202
128 0 600
OK OK OK
It
I
I-
I
I
I
I ~
3
I :
6
I
IlADE TRI" INC
CRITICAL "OVE"ENT ANALYSIS
FILE NA"E/CO""ENT: SHERATON DRI
"SKORIAL @ ISLAND IlAY
DATE: 1987
........................14...........
LEVEL OF SE~VICE C
SATURATION' 711
CRITICAL N/S VOL 443
CRITICAL EIIl VOl 722
CRITICAl SU" 1165
.14".........'.14.,14..14.11414111..
LANE
NORTHBOUND
"OV IIIDTH
...
... .
.. ,.
NORTHBOUND
I~En
THRU
RIGHT
I
I
I I PHASING
I
I
I
HRU -RI6HT
1ft
NORTHBOUND
SOUTHBOUND
EASTBOUND
IIESTBOUND
TRUCKS (II
1
1
1
1
LANE GEOttETRY
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND
"OV IlIDTH ItOV IlIDTH
R.. 12.0 T.. 12.0
L.. 12.0 T.. 12.0
. .. .... l.. 12.0
....
.... ...
.... ...
IlESTBOUND
"OV IIIDTH
R.. 12.0
T.. 12.0
T.. 12.0
....
o
o
o
TRAFFIC VOLUttES
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND IlESTBOUND "ij'
376 180 0
0 1102 862
145 0 251
LOCAL BUSES (I/HRI PEAK HOUR FACTOR
1 .9
1 .9
1 .9
1 .9
NIS :3. BOTH TURNS PROTECTED
EIII :2. HEAYIEST TURN PROTECTED
PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY: O. 0 - 99 (IPEDS/HRI
CYClE LENGTH : 80 SECONDS
NORTHBOUND
o
o
(NO OVERLAP)
CRITICAL LANE VOlU"ES BY ItOVEItENT
SOUTHBOUND
o
443
EASTBOUND
651
212
NESTBOUND
510
o
lEFT TURN CHECK
IT VOlU"E NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND IlESTBOUND
0 376 180 0
DJII'iTED VOL 0 443 212 0
IICITY 0 128 141 71
tftENT MIA NIA NIA OK
I
II
I
I-
I
I
I
LANE
I 1
2
I 3
4
5
I "
ILEFT
THRU
I I6HT
.1 NORTHBOUND
SOUTHBOUND
EASTBOUND
I WESTBOUND
I
I
WADE TRI" IHC
CRITICAL KOYE"EHT ANALYSIS
FILE NA"E/CO""ENT: SHERATON DRI
"E"ORIAL I ISLAND WAY
DATE: 1997 BACK6ROUND
ttllllllttlllllllllltfltttlltflllft"
LEVEL OF SERVICE D
SATURATION 80%
CRITICAL NIS VOL 492
CRITICAL EIW VOL 829
CRITICAL SUK 1321
Iff'tl'f"ff""""'t"fll"""""
NORTHBOUND
KOV NIDTH
NORTHBOUND
o
o
o
TRUCKS (%)
1
1
1
1
LANE 6EOJtETRY
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND
KOV NIDTH KOY NIDTH
TRAFFIC VOlUKES
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND
418 200
o 1302
161 0
LOCAL BUSES (I/HR)
1
1
1
1
IlESTBOUND
"OY NIDTH
Roo 12.0
Too 12.0
T.. 12.0
IlESTBOUND
o
1005
278
PEAK HOUR FACTOR
.9
.9
.9
.9
N/S : 3. BOTH TURNS PROTECTED
E/N :2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED
PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY: o. 0 - 99 (IPEDS/HR)
CYCLE LEN6TH : 80 SECONDS
PHASIN6
.. -RI6HT
FT
I
~pllT VOLUKE
lTED VOl
CITY
10VE"ENT
I
(NO OVERLAP)
CRITICAL LANE YOLUKES BY KOV8IEHT
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND IlESTBOUND
0 769 594
492 235 0
LEFT TURH CHECK
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND NESTBOUND
418 200 0
492 235 0
128 175 60
NIA NIA OK
NORTHBOUND
o
o
NORTHBOUND
o
o
- 0
NIA
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I LANE
1
2
I 3
4
5
I 6
I LEFT
THRU
I RIGHT
I NORTHBOUND
SOUTHBOUND
EASTBOUND
I WESTBOUND
I
I
PHASING
I.-RIGHT
.:FT
I
(liT VOLUME
;rED VOL
ACITY
MOVEtlEMT
I
WADE TRIM IHC
CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS
FILE NAME/COMMENT: SHERATON DRI
MEMORIAL @ ISLAND WAY
DATE: 1997 TOTAL TRAFFIC
fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
LEVEL OF SERVICE D
SATURATION 871
CRITICAL NIS VOL 492
CRITICAL E/W VOL 947
CRITICAL SUft 1439
fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
NORTHBOUND
MOV WIDTH
NORTHBOUND
o
o
o
TRUCKS (1)
1
1
1
1
NORTHBOUND
o
o
NORTHBOUND
o
o
o
NIA
LANE GEOMETRY
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND
MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH
WESTBOUND
"OV WIDTH
NIS :3. BOTH TURNS PROTECTED
E/W :2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED
PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY: O. 0 - 99 (tPEDS/HR)
CYClE LENGTH : 80 SECONDS
Roo 12.0
L.. 12.0
Too 12.0
Too 12.0
L.. 12.0
Roo 12.0
Too 12.0
Too 12.0
.... ....
....
... .
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND
WESTBOUND
418
o
161
~o
~.. 't.
\f - ~~
"7)~ ~O
~6~~
~G
200
1383
o
o
1206
278
LOCAL BUSES (I/HR)
1
1
1
1
PEAK HOUR FACTOR
.9
.9
.9
.9
(NO OVERLAP)
CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND . WESTBOUND
0 817 712
492 235 0
LEFT TURN CHECK
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
418 200 0
492- 235 0
128 105 130
NIA NIA OK
s. i.C.A.P. - VERSIG?4 3.2 - 2/87
It
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
LOCAT!Cr~: MEMORIAL @
t.!
OatJ
CJttI
.",:::
It
.~
r <3L.;'1~'~D
".'"'.\1
WHr
'./QLU~~ES
..--.-.--.--- -----..- -..--..
---------------
DAtE~ ~1-09-"19S7
"\ P'A~3E i C.~ 2
~~ER IOD":
PI~',
TR,~FF .
r':~EA~"'~ 1 '3S"l
TOTAL
NOHTH
EAST
WEST
SOUT~-;
LEFT TURtQ .....'OLUME (',,'PH) : (} 418 2(h) ()
THRU '../OLUME \'..,'?H} : (> (> 1383 1206
RIGHT TURN VOL. ( V PH } : \') 161 0 278
PEDESTR I AN '..,'OL. \ ~~~~H} : (> 0 0 0
'.,,'EHICULAR ',,'OL~Jf'tlE (VPH} : ~) 57'3 1583 1484
DEM~4D ADJUSTM~NT ================================
PARKING MANEUVERS(~/H}: t) t) 0 0
LANE UTILIZATION(X100}: 100 100 100 100
ARRIVAL T'r'PE (X1O}: 30 30 30 30
PEAK HOUR FACTOR -{ X1(H)} : '30 '30 '30 9'0
PROT. RIGHT TURNS (~} : 0 t) 0 0
LOCAL BUSES -{#/H} : 1 1 1 1
HEAVY VEHICLES (,,) : 1 1 1 1
APPROACH GRADE (~) : 0 0 0 0
AREA TYPE: NON-BUSINESS DISTRICT
CONTROL DATA =====================================
MIN. THRU GREEN (SEC>:
MIN. LEFT GREEN (SEC):
AP.PROACH SPEED (MPH > :
SNEAKE RS ( X 1 (> I CYCLE) :
LANE W!DTH #1 (FT>:
LANE WIDTH #2 eFT):
LANE WIDTH #3 eFT} :
LANE WIDTH #4 eFT}:
LANE WIDTH ~5 CFT>:
LANE WIDTH #6 (FT>:
CONTROLLER TYPE:
OPPOSING .....OLUME COi1tPOS!T:LON:
EAST-WES, PHASING:
NORTH-SOUTH ~HASING:
AP.PROACH GROUP
DESCRIPTION
NORTHBOUND
2:
ALL 1'1O....EMENTS
2
THRUS ONLY
RIGHTS ONLY
SOUTHBOUND
3
1
LEFTS ONLY
THRUS ONLY
EASTBOUND
2
2
THRUS ONLY
RIGHTS ONLY
WESTBOUND
3
0 0 0 0
0 :0 0 0
25 as 2.5 25
20 20 20 20
t) 12 12 12
(> 12 12 12
0 t) 12 12
(> (> 0 0
t) 0 0 0
0 (> 0 0
HIS = PRETIMED, E/W = PRETIMED
THRU & RtGHT MOVEMENTCS)
EB LEFT PROTECTED
NEITHER TURN PROTECTED
TURN DESCRIPTION
LEFT 1 NOT APPLICABLE
RIGHT: NOT APPLICABLE
LEFT: PED. FRICTION ONLY
RIGHT: EXCLUSIVE, PERM.
LEFT: EXCLUSIVE, PROT.
RIGHT: NOT APPLICABLE
LEFT: NOT APPLICABLE
RIGHT: EXCLUSIVE, P.ERM.
I'
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,... r. C. A. P. - 'ty'ERS r or.~ 3. -J 2/87 ~.,",'''',~ 11-~)g-1 '38-' {P~GE 2 0- .-
.::J. ,- -- J..li"''i ! C. :- t- o.:
LOCAT IO?-.( ~ ~~El'10R I AL ~~ r SL'A':\~D WAY PERIOD: PM P'EA;-{ 1 '39"? TDTAL T RAFF .
DEtt1A?~D lS';J~~PL 't' NU'RTH SQU'rH EAS;' WEST
TABLE GP#l ~3P#2 GP#3 G P:>> 1 GP#2 G~-~"#3 13;'::#1 GP#2 GP~3 GP#l GP#2 t;
'.,,'OLUME : 0 0 (~ -0 46"_ ::.7'3 222 1537 (> 0 1340
SAT. FLOW: 0 \) (> (> ::.523 1516 ~" 7-<)2 357'6 (~ () 3583 1
FLOW RATIO: (). t)() 0.00 0.00 0.00 o. 30 o. 12 o. 13 o. 43 0.0t) 0.00 o. 37 (
CAPACITY: 0 0 ~) (> 48& 486 233 20'';74 (> 0 1408
'VOL. ICAP. . i). -00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.'35 ~). 37 0.'35 o. 74 o. i)O 0.00 0.'35 (
.
GREEN TIME/MOVEMENT '{SEe>
AVAILABLE: 0.0 0.0 0.0 (>. (" OJ"::' OJ ,:'/,:;, 'J 11.2 37.8 o. (> 0.0 26"'6 2
~...... ~ r.;,;..L-. ~
REQUIRED: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 16. 5 7.0 8. 4 26.6 O. i) 0.0 23. 3 1
r-1EASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS
DELAY <SEC> ~ 0 () 0 0 37 12: 53 8 0 0 24
.
QUEUE (FT) . 0 i) 0 0 222 44 133 162 0 0 2.'3'3
.
STOPS (~, ) . 0 0 0 0 81 55 '30 46 (> 0 71
.
.3 PHASE OPERATION (SEC) (%)
NB & S& GREEN .:, -:-, -:) 37.0
.......... ...
EEl THRU & LEFT 1 ~ .~ 18.7
.. I;;.
E& & W& THRU 26.6 44.3
LOST TIl"1E/PHASE:
'fOTAL LOS'r T I ME :
CYCLE LENGTH:
ALL RED TIME:
FLOW RtiTIO:
DEGREE OF SAT. :
3.0 SEC
9.0 SEC
60.0 SEC
0.0 SEC
0.81
0.'35
===========~======================================================
LEFT TURN CHECK
Best Copy
Available
222
EB
we
'.,,,OLUME:
PROTECTION (PROT/PERM)~
PE fUll I TTED CA?AC I TY :
PROTECTED CAPACITY~
EXCESS LEFT TURNS:
PROT
o
233
o
==================================================================
SYSTErlf PERFORMANCE
LE'.,,'EL OF DELAY DELAY FUEL STOPPED COST
APPROACH SER',,' ICE (SEC) (HRS) (GAL) VEHICLES (oS;)
NORTHBOUND A 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0
SOUTHBOUND D 2'3.8 6."3 7.2 476 37
EASTBOUND B 13.7 8 ~ 11.0 '304 55
. ,
WESTBOUND C 21.6 12.9 14.8 1120 76
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
INTERSECTION C 1'3.5 28.5 33.0 24'3'3 - 168,
<UNIT VALUES: $ 3.00 $ 1.00 $ 0.(2)
I'
I
I
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
NADE TRIft INC
CRITICAL ftOVEftENT ANALYSIS
FILE NAftEiCOftftENT: SHERATON DRI
BEllEAIR CSY I GULF BLVD
DATE: 19B7
1IIIIIIIIIfflllllllffflffffflfflllllf
LEVEL OF SERYICE B
SATURATION 581
CRITICAL NIS YOl 4B2
CRITICAl EIII YOl 476
CRITICAL ~ 95B
ffffflflfffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
LEFT 0 245 0
THRU 169 240 0
RISHT 247 0 0
TRUCKS (I) lOCAl BUSES (IIHR)
NORTHBOUND 1 1
SOUTHBOUND 1 1
EASTBOUND 1 1
IIESTBOUND 1 1
PHASING NIS :2. HEAYIEST TURN PROTECTED
EIII :3. BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (NO OYERLAP)
PEDESTRIAN ACTIYITY: 1. 0 - 99 (IPEDS/HR)
CYQ.E LENGTH : BO SECONDS
NORTHBOUND
LANE ftOY WIDTH
1 Roo 12.0
2 Too 12.0
3 ....
4
5
6
NORTHBOUND
ill U -RIGHT
. ..EFT
NORTHBOUND
194
o
I-
NORTHBOUND
o
o
209
OK
INPUT YOLUftE
.IJSTED VOL
"ACHY
ftOYEftENT
I
....
TRAFFIC YOlUftES
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND
NESTBOUND
404
o
379
~
4:,
t
\.c'
f
\
\;-
i \,.
PEAK HOUR FACTOR
.9
.9
.9
.9
CRITICAL LANE VOlUftES BY ftOYEftENT
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
273 0 0
2B8 0 476
lEFT TURN CHECK
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND IIESTBOUND
245 0 404
2BB 0 476
79 0 0
MIA NIA MIA
I'
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'lADE TRIft INC
CRITICAL ftOVEftENT ANALYSIS
FILE NAftE/COft"ENT: SHERATON DRI
BELLEAIR CSY @ 6UlF BLVD
DATE: 1997 BACK6ROUND
tffttttfftfttfftfftffftfffffffffffffl
LEVEL OF SERVICE C
SATURATION 741
CRITICAl MIS VOL 691
CRITICAL EIN VOl 529
CRITICAL SUft 1220
ftffffffffftfftfffttffffffttfffffffff
LANE 6EOftETRY
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND NESTBOUND
LANE KOV IIIDTH ftOV IIID1H ftOV IIIDTH ftOV IlIDTH
1 R.. 12.0 Too 12.0 Roo 12.0
2 Too 12.0 Loo 12.0 Loo 12.0 ~.,;
3 .... ... .
4 . oo f,;",
5 .... fl';
,
6 ,
.
... . .. .
~,
TRAFFIC VOLUftES \
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND ItESTBOUND \
\;: ,,;
i1!'" ~;.
LEFT 0 314 0 449 e"
THRU 283 326 0 0
RIGHT 274 0 0 490
TRUCXS (1) LOCAl BUSES (I/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR
NORTHBOUND . 1 1 .9
SOUTHBOUND 1 1 .9
EASTBOUND 1 1 .9
IlESTBOUND 1 1 .9
PHASING "IS :2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED
Ell :3. BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (NO OVERLAP)
PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. 0 - 99 (IPEDS/HR)
CYQ.E LENGTH : 80 SECONDS
I U -RIGHT NORTHBOUND
322
LEFT 0
I
NORTHBOUND
I UT VOLUftE 0
.USTED VOl 0
CAPACITY 321
I' ~EftENT OK
CRITICAL LANE VDlUftES BY ftOVEftEMT
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUMD IIESTBOUND
370 0 0
369 0 529
lEFT TURN CHECX
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND ItESTBOUND
314 0 449
369 0 529
48 0 0
MIA MIA MIA
I'
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
WADE TRIIt INC
CRITICAL ItOVEltENT ANALYSIS
FILE NAltE/CDltltENT: SHERATON DRI
BEUEAIR CSY
DATE: 1997 TOTAL TRAFFIC
1f111'111'1'III'lflll"'f'fflf'f"fff
lEVEL OF SERYICE D
SATURATION 801
CRITICAL NIS VOL 786
CRITICAL EIW VOL 529
CRITICAL SUIt 1315
f'f'f'f"ff'fffff'f""""'ffffl"ff
LANE'
NORTHBOUND
ItOV WIDTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
Roo 12.0
Too 12.0
NORTHBOUND
lANE GEO"ETRY
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND
ItOY WIDTH ItOV WIDTH
WESTBOUND .
~.
!tOV NIDTH
Roo 12.0 _'A.
Loo 12.0 =n
.... fro
....
;1
WESTBOUND
Too 12.0
Loo 12.0
... .
... .
TRAFFIC YOLUItES
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND
LEFT 0 335 0 449
THRU 346 461 0 0
RIGHT 274 0 0 502
TRUCKS m LOCAL BUSES (I/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR
NORTHBOUND 1 1 .9
SOUTHBOUND 1 1 .9 .
EASTBOUND 1 1 .9
WESTBOUND 1 1 .9
PHASING N/S :2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED
EIII :3. BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (NO OVERLAP)
PEDESTRIAN ACTIYITY : 1. o - 99 (IPEDS/HR)
CYClE LEN6TH : 80 SECONDS
I ' -RIGHT NORTHBOUND
392
LEFT 0
I
NORTHBOUND
I IT VOLUtlE 0
..iSTED VOL 0
CAPACITY 265
I_ EIIENT OK
CRITICAl LANE VOlUltES BY ItOYEltENT
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND IIESTBOUND
521 0 0
394 0 529
LEFT TURN CHECK
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND IIESTBOUND .
335 0 449
394 0 529
129 0 0
NIA NIA NIA
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
S.I.C.A.P. - VERSION 3.2 - 2/87
DATE: 11-0g-1~a7
(PAGE _ 1 OF'
LOCATION: GULF BLVD. ~:!l BELLEAIR CS'r' PERIOD: P"'1 PEAK 1'3'37 TOTAL TRAFf
.
~C?
< Vl
"Ft-
.'
-n
1-0
-'0
CD~
VOLUMES =::===========::.:: NORTH SOUTH EAST WEST
LEFT TURN VOLUME (V PH} : t) 335 0 44'3
THRU VOLUflfE (VP};) -: 346 461 -0 -0
RIGHT TURN ',,'OL. (VPH} : 274 () (> 502
PEDEST R I AN VOL. ( PPH) ; '0 0 '0 0
VEHICULAR '.....OLUME (VPH}: 620 796 t) '351
DEI'IfAND ADJUSTMENT ======================================
PARKING MANEUVERS (#/H} : t) (> '0 0
LANE UTILIZATION(Xl'O'O)-: lee 10'0 10'0 1'0'0
ARRIVAL TYPE (Xl'O> : 30 30 30 30
PEAK HOUR FACTOR>:X1'OO); '~'O '3'0 ge gO
PROT. RIGHT TURNS (" >: 0 (', 0 t)
LOCAL BUSES (#/H): 1 1 1 1
HEAV'( VEHICLES (,,) : 1 1 1 1
APPROACH GRADE (~) ; '0 0 -0 0
AREA TYPE: NON-BUSINESS DISTRICT
COl'4TROL DATA ==================-===================
MIN. THRU GREEN (SEC):
MIN. LEFT GREEN (SEC);
APPROACH SPEED (MPH):
SNEAKERS (Xl'OlC'(CLE):
LANE WIDTH #1 (FT):
~ANE WIDTH #2 (FT):
LANE WIDTH #3 (FT}:
LANE WIDTH #4 (FT):
LANE WIDTH #5 (FT) :
LANE WIDTH #6 (FT):
CONTROLLER T'(PE:
OPPOSING VOLUME COMPOSITION:
EAST-WEST PHASING:
NORTH-SOUTH PHASING:
APPROACH GROUP DESCRIPTION
NORTHBOUND 2 THRUS ONL '(
3 RIGHTS ONLY
1 LEFTS ONLY
SOUTHBOUND 2 THRUS ONLY
EASTBOUND
2
ALL MOVEMENTS
2
THRUS ONL '(
R I GH-rS ONL Y
WESTBOUND
3
0 \') -\') 0
(> (} () '0
25 25 25 25
20 20 20 2'0
12 12 0 12
12 12 '0 12
c) t) 1) 0
'0 '0 () '0
t) t) t) 0
(> (> (} (>
N/S = PRETIMED, E/W = PRETIMED
THRU & RIGHT MOVEMENT(S)
NEITHER TURN PROTECTED
SB LEFT PROTECTED
TURN OESCR I PT IOPol
LEFT: NOT APPLICABLE
RIGHT: EXCLUSIVE, PERM.
LEFT: EXCLUSIVE, PROTo
RIGHT: NOT APPLICABLE
LEFT: NOT APPLICABLE
RIGHT: NOT APPLICABLE
LEFT: PED. FRICTION ONL't'
RIGHT: EXCLUSIVE, PERM.
II
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
S. 1. C. A. P. - 'VERSION 3 oj - 2/87 DATE: ll-t)'3-1 '387 (PAGE .~ OF
. ~ 1;;,.
LOCATION: GULF BLVD. I~ BELLEAIH CS..,' PERIOD: PM PEA}{ 1'3'37 TOTAL:TRAFF
DEMANDlSUPPL't' NORTH SOUTH EAST WEST
TABLE GP*1=l G 1='# 2 81='#3 GP4~ 1 GP#2 G P#-3 GP#l GP#2 GP#3 GP#l GP#2
\,10LUME: 0 384 304 372 r:., ":i- 0 t) 0 t) 0 49'3
.J..,-
SAT. FLOW: 0 17'32 1516 1702 1784 '0 0 '0 '0 0 1523
FLOW RATIO: 0.00 t). 21 t). 20 i.... .j? o. 2'3 O. ()O 0.00 -0. 00 O. t)O 0.'00 0.33
.1. ~....
CAPACITY: 0 418 354 405 '318 (> (> '0 '0 '0 609
VOL. ICAP. . 0.00 0.'32 0.86 (). 92 C)-.56 t). t)(~ '0.00 0.00 0.00 t). t)O 0.82
.
GREEN T I tltE,.'MO',,'ErIlENT (SEC>
AVAILABLE: 0.0 1'3.3 1'3.3 1'3.7 3'3.0 (}. (~ 0.0 '0.0 '0.0 0.0 31. ().
REQUIRED: 0.0 16.0 12.8 15.5 20.'3 ". () 1). t) 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.4
tlfEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS
DELAY (SEC>: 0 38 33 38 '3
QUEUE (FT> : 0 200 13'3 193 122
STOPS .~ ~<.) : '0 82 78 82 49
3 PHASE OPERATION (SEC} 0<>
SB THRU 8.: LEFT 1 ''3. 7 28. 1
NB & SB THRU 1'3.3 27.6
EB & WE! GREEN 31. (> 44.3
0 0 (> (>
0 0 0 0
(> (> 0 '0
0 2'0
0 171
0 67
3.0 SEe
LOST TIME/PHASE:
TOTAL LOST TIME:
CYCLE LENGTH:
ALL RED TIME:
Fi.-OW RATIO:
DEGREE OF SAT. :
9.0 SEe
70.0 SEe
0.0 SEC
0.80.
0.'32
=====~=======================~===========~====~===================
LEFT TuRN CHECK
NB
se
EB
WEt
VOLUME:
PROTECTION (PRQT/PERM}:
PERtlf I TTED CAPAC I TY:
PROTECTED CAPACITY:
EXCESS LEFT TURNS:
--,-:)
.,:),'-
PROT
o
40~
o
===============================================~==========-=======
SYSTEM PERFORMANCE
LEVEL OF DELAY DELAY FUEL STOPPED COST
APPROACH SERVICE {SEe> (HRS} (GAL} VEHICLES ($>
NORTHBOUND D 35.6 8.'3 8.8 554 46
SOUTHBOUND C ~<f c:- 6.'3 -. - 558 39
I.;;,. J. . .:J ,'. t
EASTBOUND A 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0
WESTBOUND C 24.'3 9.5 10.5 758 54
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
INTERSECTION D 26.6 .j&:'" OJ 27. () 1870 140
~..J.a.;;.
(UN I T '.,,'ALUES ;: '$ 3. (;(> $ 1.00 '$ 0.02>
III
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I lEFT
THRU
I RIGHT
I
I PHASIN6
I
I
WADE TRII'I INC
CRITICAL I'IOVEI'IENT ANALYSIS
FILE NAI'IE/COI'II'IENT: SHERATON DRI
WAlSIN6HAI'I @ 6UlF BlYD
DATE: 1987
1IIIIIIIIIIIIfllllflfltfflfffllflllll
lEYEL OF SERYICE C
SATURATION 66%
CRITICAL NIS YOL 686
CRITICAL EIW VOL 400
CRITICAL SU" 1086
fllllllflllllllllflffflllffftffftfffl
LANE
NORTHBOUND
troy NIDTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
R..
T..
12.0
12.0
NORTHBOUND
o
275
239
TRUCKS (%)
1
1
1
1
NORTHBOUND
SOUTHBOUND
EASTBOUND
WESTBOUND
LANE GEO"ETRY
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
I'IOY WIDTH I'IOV WIDTH "OY NIDTH
T.. 12.0 R.. 12.0
L.. 12.0 ~.. L.. 12.0
.... .... .. . ....
.... ... ....
... . .. . .... . .. ....
.. . ....
I'
~
<
"
-,
--
,,\
tiJ
cr
~
- '.,;
-~
TRAFFIC VOLUI'IES
SOUTHBOUND
EASTBOUND
WESTBOUND
317
297
o
o
o
o
340
o
491
LOCAL BUSES (I/HR)
1
1
1
1
PEAK HOUR FACTOR
.9
.9
.9
.9
NIS :2. HEAYIEST TURN PROTECTED
Ell :3. BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (NO OYERLAP)
PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY: 1. 0-- 99 (IPEDS/HR)
CYClE LEN&TH : SO SECONDS
NORTHBOUND
I -RIGHT 313
EFT 0
I NORTHBOUND
I NPlIT YOLUI'IE 0
I STED VOL 0
r ACITY 349
1'I0YEIlENT OK
I
CRITICAL LANE YOLU"ES BY tIOYEltEMT
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND' IIESTBOUND
337 0 0
:m 0 400
LEFT TURN CHECK
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND NESTBOUND
317 0 340
373 0 400
24 0 0
NIA N/A MIA
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
IlADE TRIll INe
CRITICAL 1l0VEIlENT ANALYSIS
FILE NAIlE/COIlIlENT: SHERATON DRI
IlAlSINGHAIl I GULF BLYD
DATE: 1997 BACKGROUND
ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffl
LEYEL OF SERVICE D
SATURATION 78Z
CRITICAL HIS YOL 845
CRITICAl EIIl VOL 445
CRITICAL'SUIl 1290
ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffl
LANE GEOIlETRY
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND IlESTBOUND
LANE 1l0V IlIDTH 1l0Y IlIDTH 1l0V IlIDTH 1l0Y IlIDTH
1 R.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 R.. 12.0
2 T.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 .. . .... L.. 12.0 J!'
3 .... ... . ....
4 .... ... . . .. C
5
6 " "
....
-'
TRAFFIC YOLUJtES -'I
~~
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND IlESTBOUND
tt
LEFT 0 386 0 378 .-
THRU 345 354 0 0 e'
RIGHT 265 0 0 601
TRUCKS (ZI LOCAL BUSES (I/HRI PEAK HOUR FACTOR
NORTHBOUND 1 1 .9
SOUTHBOUND 1 1 .9
EASTBOUND 1 1 .9 .
IlESTBOUND 1 1 .9
PHASING NIS :2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED
EIII :3. BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (NO OVERLAP I
PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY: 1. 0 - 99 (IPEDS/HRI
CYnE LENGTH : 80 SECONDS
NORTHBOUND
I ~ -RIGHT 391
LEFT 0
I
NORTHBOUND
'ITYOLIIIIE 0
JSTED YOL 0
PACITY 444
.1E1lENT OK
CRITICAL LANE YOlUIlES BY IlOYEJtENT
SOUTHBOUND
401
454
EASTBOUND
o
o
IIESTBOUND
o
445
lEFT TURN CHECK
SOUTHBOUND
386
454
10
NIA
EASTBOUND
o
o
o
NIA
IlESTBOUND
378
445
o
NIA
I'
I
I-
I
I
I
I LANE
1
I ~
4
5
I 6
I
LEFT
I THRU
RIGHT
I NORTHBOUND
SOUTHBOUN>>
EASTBOUND
I MESTBOUND
I
I
PHASING
"ADE TRI" INC
CRITICAL "OVEftENT ANALYSIS
FILE NAftE/CO""ENT: SHERATON DRI
NALSINGHAft @ GULF BLVD
DATE: 1997 TOTAL TRAFFIC
111111111111111111111111111111111f111
LEVEL OF SERVICE D
SATURATION 801
CRITICAL NIS VOL 870
CRITICAL E/" VOL 445
CRITICAL SUft 1315
flllllllllffflflfffflfflfllflfflffllf
NORTHBOUND
ftOV NIDTH
Roo 12.0
Too 12.0
... ....
NORTHBOUND
o
345
265
TRUCKS (II
1
1
1
1
LANE GEOItETRY
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND
"OV WIDTH "OV "IDTH
II
~~
,,'
-,
-n
'0
i~
WESTBOUND
"OV WIDTH
Too 12.0
L.. 12.0
Roo 12.0
L.. 12.0
... .,
. ....
....
.. .
TRAFFIC VOLU"ES
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND
WESTBOUND
407 0
468 0
o 0
378
o
628
LOCAL BUSES (I/HRI
1
1
1
1
PEAK HOUR FACTOR
.9
.9
.9
.9
MIS :2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED
EIII :3. BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (NO OVERLAP)
PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY: 1. 0 - 99 (IPEDS/HRI
CYClE LEN6TH : 80 SECONDS
! I -RIGHT
lEFT
II
! IT VOLUIIE
, STED VOL
CAPACITY
IEJlENT
NORTHBOUND
391
o
NORTHBOUND
o
o
341
OK
CRITICAL LANE VOLU"ES BY ftOVEItENT
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND "ESTBOUND
529 0 0
479 0 "5
LEFT TURN CHECK
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
407 0 378
479 0 445
138 0 0
NIA NIA NIA
I'
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
s. r.C.A.p. - VERSION 3.2 - 2/87
DATE: 11-0'3-1'387
{PAGE 1 OF
LOCATION: WALSINGHAM f~ GULF BLVD
PERIOD: PM PEAK 1997 TOTAL TRAFF
',,'OLUMES -----------.----- NORTH SOUTH EAST WEST
---------------
LEFT TURN VOLUl'>lE -( VPH} : \") 407 0 378
THHU VOLUME -( VPH > -: 345 468 0 (>
RIGHT TURN '\I'OL. -( V PH} : 265 t) 0 628
PEDESTRIAN VOL. >: PPH} -: (> (> 0 (>
VEHICULAR VOLUME (VPH} : 610 875 (> 1006
DEMAND ADSUSTMENT ================================
PARKING MANEUVERS-(~/H}: 0 0 0 0
LANE UYILIZATIONCX100}: 100 100 100 100.
as ARR I '..IAL T't'PE {Xl0} : 30 3f) 30 30
PEAK HOUR FACTOR C X 1 O~,) > -: '30 '30 '30 '30
~Gl PROTo RIGHT TURNS (~.:, > ~ 0 0 0 0
LOCAL BUSES (#/H> : 1 . 1 1
_'t. J.
HEAVY VEHICLES ,;.:, > ~ 1 1 1 1
=n APPROACH GRADE ,~> : (~ 0 0 0
AREA TYPE: NON-BUSINESS DISTRICT
'0 CONTROL DATA ====~========~======================
;'a MIN. THRU GREEN {SEe> : 0 (} 0 (\
rlfI N . LEFT GREEN ,SEe} : 0 0 0 0
APPROACH SPEED {MPH> : 25 25 25 25
SNEAKERS (X 1 O/CYCLE} : 20 20 20 20
LANE WIDTH #1 (FT} ~ 12 12 (\ 12
LANE WIDTH #2 (FT) -: 12 12 () 12
LANE WIDTH #3 C FT} : ~) t) 0 0
LANE WIDTH #4 eFT> : 0 0 0 0
LANE WIDTH #5 { FT} : t) 0 0 0
LANE WIDTH #6 (FT>: 0 0 0 0
CONTROLLER TYPE:
OPPOSING VOLUME COMPOSITION:
EAST-WEST PHAS!NG:
NORTH-SOUTH PHASING:
N/S = AC"rUATED, E/W = ACTUATED
THRU r"OVEMENT \8>
NEITHER TURN PROTECTED
sa LEFT PROTECTED
APPROACH GROUP DESCRIPTION
NORTHBOUND 2 THRUS ONL'(
3 RIGHTS ONLY
1 LEFTS OML'r'
SOUTHBOUND 2 THRUS ONLY
TURN DESCRIPTION
LEFT:: NOT APPLICABLE
RIGHT: EXCLUSIVE, PERM.
LEFT: EXCLUSIVE, PROTo
RIGHT; NOT APPLICABLE
LEFT: NOT APPLICABLE
EAS'fSOUND
2
ALL MOVE,.,ENTS
RIGHT: NOT APPLICABLE
LEFT: PEt>. FRICTION ONL','
WESTBOUND
2
THRUS ONL't'
RIGHTS QNL'(
RIGHT:: SXCLUSIVE, PERM.
3
r.,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
S. l.C.A.P. - VERsrON 3 -'j - 2/87 DATE: 11-~)g-1 g87 (PAGE 2 OF
. ~
LOCATION: WALSINQHAM l!l GULF BLVD PERIOD: PM PE1=a, 19'37 TOTAL TRAFF
DEMAND /SUPPL 't' NORTH SOUTH EAST WEST
TABLE GP#1 GP#2 GP~3 GP'# 1 GP#2 GP#3 Gj:<# 1 GP#2 GP#3 GP#l GP#2
VOLUME: 0 383 294 452 520 1) 0 0 0 0 420
SAT. FLOW: 0 17'32 1516 1702 1784 0 (> (> () 0 1523
FLOW RATIO: 0.00 0.21 o. 1 '3 0.27 0.29 o. t)O ~). Of) O. \")0 0.00 O. t)O 0.28
CAPACITY: (> 371 314 438 882 0 (> 0 (> 0 678
VOL.lCAP. : 0.00 1. ()3 0.94 1.03 0.S9 o. t)O 0.00 0.00 O. t)O O. t)O 0.62
GREEN T I ME/tIfOVEMENT (SEC>
AVAILABLE: 0.0 23.7 23.7 28.7 52.5 0.0 (). (I 0.0 0.0 o. () 47.6
REGUIRED: 0.0 22.3 17.4 26. 1 2'3.'3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ().1) .24. :5
MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS
DELA'( (SEC > :
~~ <;:: ;
O //,'"
ro.
C.)
46
64
336
100
(>
o
(>
71 12 0 (> (> (> 0 14
383 185 (> 0 0 (> 0 156
100 55 0 0 (> () 0 59
(">
212
87
.3 PHASE: OPERATION (SEC)
S8 THRU & LEFT 28.7 28.7 LOST TIME/PHASE: 3.0 SEe
~: NB & sa THRU 23.7 23.7 TOTAL LOST TIME: g.O SEC
..... 1 '-' EB & W8 GREEN 47. 6 47. 6 CYCLE LENGTH ~ 100. (> SEe
':A ,-~ ALL RED TIME: t).O SEe
w, ~ FLOW RATIO: 0.'34
. C DEGREE or- SAT.. 1.03
am ==============_==_=============~~=================================
LEFT TURN CHECK NB sa EB WE<<
VOLUME: 452
. PROTECTION (PRO'f/PERM) : PROT
PERMITTED CAPACITY: 0
PROTECTED CAPACITY: 438
EXCESS LEFT TURNS: 14
=======~=__===~=__==============~=======================3====~=~==
SYSTEI'If PERFORMANCE
LEVEL OF DELAY DELA'( FUEL STOPPED COST
APPROACH SER.....ICE ~SEC} (HRS) (GAL} .....EHICLES {$}
NORTHBOUND E 56.4 13.6 12.3 638 66
SOUTHBOUND 0 3S.3 13.8 12.g 73g €IS
EASTBOUND A 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0
WESTBOUND 0 35.5 14.3 14.6 947 76
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
INTERSECTION E 41.9 41. g 3g.8 2324 212:
,UNIT VALUES: -$ 3.00 '$ 1.00 .$ 0.02>
I - ~ - ~.. - - ~ - - I - - -"'l - - .,. - -ri - -
I: l:)
m
)( 0 c
0 ." r-
."
0 0
~ /1
~
.
~
I.
Ul
~
~
~
9
m
~ m
c
en
~
ii=
p
r
sn
....
Ul
~
ii=
p
r
~fi\"'O""" ~:
~):
......"'fi
''J~O ~ "
.~t.
t.~'\
~ ~
I ~ "" ~~~
t~~'~
i
.
I
1 ,
~~
..~~ . ~
. ~
I
i
.
m
I
I
[
I
)1m
<~ fD
r.~ M
'"
-, . t-it-
1\1.;' II
~.. n
tpO
--a
CD'(
~
~
i
i
i
i
i
.
l._._._._._._._._._._._...!._._._._._._._._._._._._._._.J
GULF BLVD.
....
~
I
..;.a.
i:
)>
-a
BEACH ACCRETION
RECORDS
SHERATON
SAND KEY RESORT
~~i~' Wade-Trim
= J Engineering Landscape Architecture
....:iiI. Planning Environmental Sciences
1-
- -
.
~", - - ~ - - t - - ~ - - .,. - ~ - -
J:
Q
..
~ z
.. 0 \ \
~ :D
-t
:t:
'" ~
Q
a; \J
Q
i:
)>
'"tJ
PRELIMINARY
CONCEPTUAL MASTER
DEVELOPMENT PLAN
SHERATON
SAND KEY RESORT
Consulta nts: Wade-Trim
Edward D. Stone & Associate
Nathan Evans Pounders & Ta lor
--------1IIp
~~<.'""
.. - t - - ~ [') - -
- - --
r;
G')
c:
3: 0 ,..
m ." ."
0 ><
N 0
~ Z 0
.. 0
~ :0
-t
J:
CD
~
_.
0:
~
/
/
..-
~
\ \
~
\j
il
+ I t
=
r- =
"TI -0 -0 '"tI -
5" .., .., .., m ~
0 0 0 ~
~ "'C "'C "'C C)
0 0 0
g CJ) CJ) CJ) m
.., CD CD CD I . i_I .
CD 0. 0. 0. Z
g ~ (J) (J) c
0 r+ r+
r+ 0 0
::J CD .., ..,
.., 3 3
CD
0. (J)
::J
m CD CD
::J ~ r+
0. CD
..,
en
CD
0
:t-
o
::J
G)
3:
)>
'"C
MASTER DRAINAGE PLAN
SHERATON
'SAND KEY RESORT
Consultants: W d T i
a e- r m
Edward D. Stone & Associate
Nathan Evans Pounders' & Ta lor'
- - - ItIl... - - ..
,,~..
m
- -rr-
~
- -"J - - - - -~- -
G)
c:
3: 0 ,...
"Tl
m "Tl
)(
0
0
N 0
~ Z
~ 0 I
:xl
~ -f
:x
QI
~
a:
~
I
I
I
I
I
s: () 0
s>> 0
I I I I
s: () 0
s>> 0 ..~..
0- s>> r-
(1) en
r+ m
r s>>
s>> G)
:J OJ I I
0- CD m
s>>
." (") Z
0' ::r ,..
:E (1) C 0
en
g 0
...
CD
0 I I
::
0
:J
o
o
I
I
I
-
-
I
I
s:
m
-
-
GULF BLVD,
3:
)>
"
SOilS
SHERATON
SAND KEY RESORT
,..
r~ Wade-Trim
B Engineering Landscape Architecture
.... . Planning Environmental Sciences
- _r_ - ..-,- - .. - -n- - .., - - - - -..-,-
\ ~
I'~ I
m
G)
m
z
c
o
N
C!
,.
C!
CD
C!
...
Gl
C!
(') C/)
o "'C
:J 0
... ...
g m
.., -
CD
c: ~
:J ...
CD -.
o
:J
o ~
-a
z
o
:D
-4
:I:
I
C)
c:
i: 0 r-
m "Tl "Tl
)(
o
o
I
I~
:16
~ /
~~~~
~:;/'/ C
1 ~/~ 1 ~
~/..~~
---~ ~-------~/ '. 11\ ~ ~
/~ ( / /\ \J II(
V.~../J L
_:-J LC (y. ..
~2f~ ~ ( 0 1 !
· C ~~\\jO ~~.\
.~ · ~ 11 \J
\~ /) \ ~I
~ \~ u~r
~ rJ il ·
I
I
...
'..
. I
-
-
c.J
'"
~
GULF BLVD.
TOPOGRAPHY
SHERATON
SAND KEY RESORT
~~~~ Wade-Trim
. ~ Engineering Landscape Architecture
~ Planning EnvlronmanlalSelanee.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
_.-
..... ..w
",
.t-'
.
it
",t
~ 111 -~
CD
tit
~
..
11I))11
.. n
~
a-O
--a
CD'C
'"
.,
.,
.,
.,
.
'.
'.
'.
'.
'.
,
.
'.
'.
'.
'.
,
.,
.'.,
.'.
".'i_~' t
/,.*'
A..
SHERATON SAND KEY RESORT
MAP SOURCE:
HAMRICK AERIAL SURVEYS, INC,
S1/218 29~15
MAP B
DATE OF PHOTOGRAPHY:
NOVEMt3EH 1984
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH
.......... Wade-Trim
... A'!3' I~ ·
E =, '= J t:l1glfleerlllLj LandscaIJe Archltecturt'
~~~~M S
.~_~. Planning Environmental clence::.
201 E. Kennedy Blvd ~ulte 334 Tampa, FL 3360:'
t!t...