The URL can be used to link to this page

CRA 00-09-01 eRA 00-09-0 1 100 N Greenwood Ave PSTA III . . /~ ~!ltttfzml &!-~CR/r /tItJ-, ~ fflh /tU4W --- .. i!!f!1- ~~ - {ffJ1ff /~~t: _ad~3d?An~ . t5q3 11//-. ff7~ ~ ~//Wl #/'(;~'lhk, ~~d P?Jd. .an/~ c9/1 ff:,?J~ Ctf~~~<<I~~~~~ ~ aatgff7?}- ~i:6 ;;J;I//h/h/(~OJ 7//e I~~ $/fn amim6 - jJJj:Jt7?I/1P'" j/atb OJ U!#tI;J?-; /5 Y1?~&/~ /~ /tE4j!- ~ ~~ c:1o}J~1< f'~~~I-~Jb/?5. w/t'h - ~):;jp~//~.#IIt'$ /- th ~./?J~ t/lhP7#-7~dt:1:57;~ /r;f?/1y Z - tb W~I? ~ Irq ffft:7t:J0 ~ ~df7;~ tV -7 /5/J7m~~/?~c// II (frJ a; P1- (1(}c:J~~) jaduy-~~ JU#tJlH?dg> f/~~ cJh e:;/a<e-+/~/%'L /!~MMW/?Jt~ - /l1f~ff6k /l~/;Jc. 111??)/W" <(Y~,L?~ ~;I/ ~h ~e- //~ t7hh7j?~ , -' r . . \, ~ IN ~ wl;;;;4J- Pi~ ----- 1JJmrh ~ f5tJr , Pv't ~fvk th~} I /~ J CIJ?~ Ft7 /y/ Ilf '!! III . . /11/-2- &r./!;::/vm = /JJiY/PI#:)G~ -Cf3c-//7$d~. /r>>:-#i IU#/ih/d. ~ -@1.... .Jr r~Mdl?b'17'k-r::lh11f wi jt7JOXlJn/a.lz> ?k/rw/1.- ~/~~~~1/CJ<? (J ~ '. )11e ;}l /J1/4'~d::. /;;#U)" ~ '" i i ~ Ctmt9f?:-(:;UJW-~/t!'OJ-. ~)t5/~ " O;/l~ti UftJftf~ - Op~ " /1~'ZZ2;HV&tJ-.-'4kd//7& 11>>-55 tpo. Jtftfr ._ -a/~d&Lf:1&tl/x ~~d . ~?2!1Mt> ~tM ,bkf- .t;JJ~. J~rfl>>q/p-y.it~ 1! /lJmfY/iPt4Jat/d/ <lJo/:;e 7'- ;17// IIt1UW, )4d (gz .... jlZe e;~~ --#7?~c- OJ/I!~ ~7 CtJV-~~c:r/ - -fd ~zlJt C~ o/f/h/dI t1) I/J/ZJ?Jle ~ !II . . ~ . . /Ii/ - ? flt/11{ 1Jh~_/~fftJu/l;t4Jld~. - Joof/~-~d/Z;Yl{}2j1O~ W&OJd7/~wj~ q;p~ ') (;;-UJ1f: /J1~ - ~c:f} /()lJ~-g;;Ie I()()~ e;/tJW - bw/iI- /~ ipJ ap d:? cp;~ ~ )%wA~~ · ~ 3- ~/ ckl/~ III . . .. . . . e \e. c.f.-.A 3 >- ~ (fpLD 3) u To: Bill Home, Interim City Manager From: Ralph Stone, Planning Director Date: January 8, 2001 RE: Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority Request At the November 13 meeting, the Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) deferred action on the Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority (PST A) request to amend the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan in order to construct a new terminal. The CRA deferred action on the request in order for staff to identifY potential alternative sites for a new PST A terminal. Planning Department staff identified four potential sites for a new terminal. Attached please find information and maps of those four sites. Staff also met with representatives of PST A and provided them the attached information. On December 14, 2000 a letter from the Executive Director of PST A was sent to the City stating that the sites identified do not meet PST A criteria. Attached also please find a copy ofthat letter. Staff will be prepared to discuss these alternatives with the City Commission at the January meeting. Attachments . . . e e POTENTIAL PST A SITES 1. Existing PST A Site with County Parking Lot Land Area: 2.06mol Zoning: Downtown Downtown Redevelopment Plan Land Use: Public/Government Ownership: a. 16/29/15/32292/005/0070 - PST A b. 16/29/15/32292/005/0060 - Pinellas County - Water/Sewer c. 16/29/15/32292/005/0110 - Pinellas County - Water/Sewer d. 16/29/15/32292/005/0040 - Pinellas County - Water/Sewer e. 16/29/15/32292/005/0010 - Pine lIas County - Water/Sewer 2. Site located on Cleveland St. between N. Evergreen Ave. and Hillcrest Ave. Land Area: 1.357 mol Zoning: Commercial Ownership: a. 1364 Cleveland St., 15/29/15/64890/001/0080 - Jamil Salhab b. 15/29/15/64890/001/0070 - Peter Gianfilippo c. 15/29/15/64890/001/0060 - Peter Gianfilippo d. 1370 Cleveland St., 15/29/15/64890/001/0050 - Peter Gianfilippo e. 10 N. Hillcrest, 15/29/14/64890/001/0010 - Peter Gianfilippo 3. Site located between Cleveland St. & Park St. & San Remo Ave. & Hillcrest Ave. Land Area: 1.817 mol Zoning: Commercial and Medium Density Residential Ownership: a. 1417 Cleveland St., 14/29/15/47016/002/0010 - Helen C. Arfaras & Mary G. Fajardo Trustee b. 1390 Gul to Bay Blvd, 14/2915/47016/002/0190 - William 1. and Mary A. Moran . . . e e c. 1410 Park St., 14/29/15/47016/002/0170-Pecoraro Consult. Inc. d. 1416 Park St., 14/29/15/47016/002/016 - Pecoraro Consult. Inc. e. 1420 Park St., 14/29/15/47016/002/0150 - Jolly Rodger Invest Corp. 4. Site located on Gulf to Bay, Highland Ave. and De Leon St. Land Area: 2.055 mol Zoning: Commercial and Medium Density Residential Ownership: a. 1498 Gulfto Bay Blvd., 14/29/15/10476/007/0060 - Richard P. Levy b. 1488 Gulfto Bay Blvd., 14/29/15/10476/007/0090 - Ercole & Rosa Volpe c. 1472 Cleveland St., 14/29/15/10476/007/0150 - SeIim Vinca d. 1489 De Leon St., 14/29/15/10476/007/0010 - Merwyn and Merilyn HasselI Trustees e. 330 S. Highland Ave., 14/29/15/10476/007/0020 - Merwyn and Merilyn HasselI Trustees 2 I~~ ~ I Ii. I I;a "~ ~ I i ~~-u I I I I I~. ,,1 ~ I ~ f25[;i I II ~]I E i-,~-- n -t- :-~ ~ I .. ~ I I I I I ~ ~""'"-<ol~ ~ I - ~ 1 1 I ~, I €M' ~ ~ '2fJ~Ji'~" + ~ ~ I I I I 2 St. fiOl.l po OtII ~ I ~ N o t"' 0 . o e ~ ~ 7 9 en <D CD om OJ> ~ ~ ~~ I ----- cL';-<L1." Cf.-,Q ~ 60 r ;U ~ ..----~ 0 Q ~ ~o~~ ~ ~ ~-i ~ -t::~;~ ~; - " ,,~ Iy I ~ ::x: c" f;I fi I ~ ~ -" ~ - 0 2 ~ ! t-' ~0 t I ~V f1jJ'0 ~ ~ rn '"~_ ,j ~ ) ~ '" ",N~' ~ ~ () pn HALLj __---- Il ;( f ~ . '" 0 fB:- - ~ c"' · " . ~ ~"~ h - /"" I ~ ~j ~ ~ 2M r- 0 B ~ r:l '" '" I I L ~ OAl( A~UE ~.... ~ ro . -G.~ fit- ~ ~ ~ '" en ... C ~ 0 00 "'~ ~ :. ~ ~ - j,~": r~ ~ "_', ~ ; " ~ , " ~' :;: l~.9i - - ~ W NO - :; ~ ~ "'-'.. 0 0 N ~ : :~_ k~~ ~ f - ~~ ~ - .. N 0> <.0 (Jl rn~ c: w ~ N 623 ----j - ~ f-!j .... - "7 f-- "'. I---- f-- ~ - ~ r-- r- f--- - = :z rTl "N .l>- 0 ~ Z ~ Z :J C) S.R.595 0 SOUlli "'~I~"''''' ~ "" I ;~: ~oto.'-J> . '" '" '" '" .... /;; -, t;;/:"-l 0 '-' Lf --< c.... ~~ en ~ - .........., c..,., f" II ~ ::l 8 ~ S. Q.UlllEN [If f<<>o'o I ~.. ~ : 19 ~ f:!': 6 ; 1'-0 : /'" '" ;;~I~"'uQJtO UlI~ ...., ~121)1 "VENUE ~ lliEtJ ~ to Cll6Jt ...... - (() (XI ....., ~o m:r i+~~N~ - 6U ..,I~I ": ~~f.ti, ~ <0, '1li001~1t ;; ....&:if I N o~- 0 _ +1-4/04 tf6 0; - · 14/03 606 en s~ ~ (..jtn6ZS ~f:@ ~ ':~W ~ IOU -4>- ('A -f 6.!O t:: I 0) tUI ..0 ~.- <<~.2---:::::-- 'IS o 8 ~ ~ <<%.I c: ~ ~ ~N ~ '=- r--rn~_ ~ 0 ~ "'-'660 to CD .. &51 ~~: .". \CV6$:t 6303 '" 636 EAS1 700 ~ <5 ~ " o ~ ~ "'''' 00 - "'- 700 FORT , < ~: 2 0< " ~ ... 286A ~ ..., ~ .. R~ _ __---l ~ -& 515 .... '-' 8 ~ > C11 '" ~ C z ~ '-10': 0.", '<' ,:;~ 6M ~, 00 I ..., ~'" ~ 00 Z ~ '" .. " Q) "" - ~ <;()II". MJ AI:: '0' ~i - l-J.l~ N "'.! ~02 ~REI A npl'<- ;:;L.<Jif: N4-sf.> 61:Z~ ~(A --,;;- ~ t-;:; ~~ ~ 14/01 ~~:; ~ ~'OJ 5771'0 01, j~P-~,~- _ ::'Z r:~f"" ~! -;;;;:;;::b..Cb .. "'o(e, ;; ~ ~ on",... :: ~~ ~ wy- , r 5."- R.R. Ord_ 116 ! ~ 70~ l.D ~) /'<.) ~ 70-1 '" U 8 N~ "'~ - ~ <5 .j, '< 1- <D N <n ~ J00 H I ~ I - ~ ~ u ~ I ~ _ ?'" 8 ~-c;;-- 706 " t Yr. 60 1I'l1lTl.f "'0 801/ ~ I '--5] I PO ICE " 6r-- 'v;, ... o 60 g ~ " " 60 <:> U. ~~ ~Q 703 0" A~!.1f ;: o TH. =I~, 50 ~J~~:II~" ~p" '01_ ..., ",8 T V L8Z IWO Best Cop Availabl ~ o :::c . N o Z rTl c: Z rTl N o z z C) o rTl '" Q :! o ~ f'1 o ~ n I i I I 1...J ~@ }> C) :u rTl f'1 <: f'1 z -4 Ol/) CI --<}> UlO CJf'1 f'10 OP .- ;.u, Q :! ,- o --< ,- ~ --< Ul p o o :u f'1 ~ 6ff~ ::g .;fQ t~tt In """",,,oc NOR'TH n<:N'rv .. ,0.00f;5-;1;P:>" ... ~tz1 ~70l\]~:f ~ I CD ~ ~~ ~ c;-'-:2 <0;: : ~~ ~rt1 2-.0 F... C4 <> ".2'"C:j2. at';!"';;I". CD a :~ ~Oo ~IJ~ 4~ 8~.:j-]-;::; ;;; ~ :"r~1 .. ;:1~ s ~_~1/10 .. (; /-1 /~:: =F~' i;~ ~ g ~ ~>JI~I~j~~ Ot .....(... ;: wA1 ~ ~ I "6 :rw"\U<<JE III :: -? <5:" ~ ~' - ~ Qo u ;u US" f..T Q!'..... at ~,>o Co N 1"8 < 61UU\' 0) ..... = 1~ 0. .33 _ N t: ~ NORlH GARI>EX !: AVENUE ..".- f:,:jO~LE~lr.~N7'F:1l ~ i:>-4a ~b.J"'/:G", 1'; :::-;'8;;\ L04-82 ~" ~S' .... r ~ &7Z~.8i~~ I ~~ '" '" ~ rn a 620 CJ:) -...J Ol ~ ~- r---- , '" - ~n", _ ~ (; I" "%'0..,. 11 t::::\ l\) 0 Z ~~.:.- <<3D - ;u ~ ......... ::0 t:: 6Z1J_- "" ~~J:I ,o-']~ _ -:7 ~: : ~t · @8.;i i .., e I~ 2n8_651 ALT U-S.19 c: JJ ; I~:I ~~ ~ IT1 80 5,. 6'. O'J 5" If. ". -+-- -~z7 t, 6.., ti-# " 11/05 814 CD 628c;rG-\ U\'flZ7 .....~ .... zg tSl0~"~~ !f7;;_ U'-'6 IUO W fin -;. 11 0 700 '" ......" ~<D 60 I~ lJ(J3 U. CD ,- o o '" z c <: '-Ie1tS Cb i!ft .:u N.... - 8n '" 101 I'" 707 1-.;:-- ", L-o 7fJ ......."'- 7/6 71'0 7f7 ". -- 30 708 0'1 ~ ~ _;;_SOllH &~ ~ rl+-. - Wi 00 7rTX 0; 1M' ,- f'l GJ f'l Z o ,(/)~~ n 0 f:: 0 C1 ~ r 11 => -+-- '"", ~ -fj: --= " '00 ~ ~~....,., ~ 7U co t.o ~ .... =g<o o 7~M NORlH _ _ 60 /~ Il \ 9n-oJ 01 ~ I ...... ::a o a::: ." o ~ ~~ CIJ u:~ ~~ tJj~ 51 0 ~~ en :=EO ~ g '" :z I --l g; /'Tl '" ;0 ;;: 1 r ,...,~ ~z, --1 g +i'.l ,... r" ~, :J' DREW III r----.. ~l:O ~ ..~ ~ ~ ~'" I~ ' f~ :1; .:; ~I' ~ ~ .:! C20/~ ~ r.a ..: ~, ~ j rQ\ ~ ~ o I ~ 8~ ;" I -i:-- f--r-- ~1i:::8- f'i:\ ~f.\ z: '(~:rr I \:'J 10 ~ it-a. uo '-- - N~;g I g!;lr~ ~ ~~ :ii I ~o. .~'" ~ ' ~a ~ -<0 N '- o '-' I- ~ 704 ~ Q J.a ~ '-' 04~W : jl " 0 ~ili :: rTS ~ '" f:l N -i "'~ "'- ~ti "' ~ ON -N C;I'0N /'%1:;: no~ 71~'i! (; l;)_ 1oflTillf.. A~ 50 c COtJOl/ ==:_"-4 1 "'803!JsqZ'" I ~ I -Re6 II eo,,. I ~ ~ '- 'i: ." Q OllC03S-'O"l) ~~~g~a~&~ Ci.';:;,~3;: ~ ~':; 0" .io;~:::J2a..~~ .. t} --., - 0 ~ ::( n.~ ?.3-gg~~~~~ iHWm ( 5' aC; g " ~.. g~ o rrU q2 !;; o [ ~ gj~~ l~ o 0 ~ 50 50 u: U ~ - '" '--- I I !~ "'" - "'17 ~ 1.#36 '--1m ,.,'" I~ - 1ffl ~ U~7 ~ ,.,61 ~ ::: ~ 145S1 I-- 1448 "<60 <0 HO!::::' U.,~~ o !t ~:;: ~ --Th -7~~ ~ f.I()9 OJ 14N fUS -.....J 'Uti _'iF 00 1119 1121 ~HM /'.,) 1126 ...c... !.LZ'1' '" 1129 - '43f N f.lS3 N 1436 N 149 (,.I ,.,911 ~!.!!' (-U3 - ... 1117 Co ...... () ...... Q !q ..... ~ _f~a' 50 .... .'0 kl ~ I P-.:I l? .....J"'"-...p. IiOt === ~ u: .,.. re ~ ~ Ul CWI OJ f.iJj.S :.0 ~ f: i '" '" I ~, ~ ~O ..... '.. N .... 1-103 5!5' ~ 01 ~ I'\) t--?I ~ u "-J ~o <II r. f---~_: =_ 1404_ ~~~~ ~-_;:._-::-:.EO~ f!-a!...trr- 0 - 1-.J '?:J_== _0",,\ 'iiii6_ 11011'" "07 110. .p. .~ IHn """ n '" "" '" ,IV 1407 == 't :;~:tE. m',':,:-,:~:U ~J!?L ~;i-~ ~~~~ On <> It~;#0'9::::::: 'I08U Z :~:~ C ::; ;;;; I- ;;; N ;;) ;;;: il w~ %~~ (]) ...~ ~~y"" I : l ;:: ~ ;;;~.. inrrco -\0 :\ -' Uf7 ..... U11S ~ f'.J I-If? ~ ("'6 -- "". -;..~ C; . 1-('6 _ 1.('8 )t ~cn,.,t9 - ~~ C 1-118 (]I Co~ ~ ~..,. G" -;;~",- ~-ff~~ r:~ 'j ;;;; z ::~:;: "' ~...>.. '" & ~ ) ~ .';;; -;,>-: On ;;:; - .( ,..., 25............ ~~2 _ -';.~d'" ...~\O e,..., _ TII<~:Z ....,. = _"~ifi';;: 7f;:..,.- '" ,;~ _ 0 Y_ .'0' 1<2" f.f20;;' '" fI == fl1I - - ;q:."",-O.. 0" " = r,L-&,.c- ,,:zg r flna> ; ~ fl2S .J - ~"'~~c:.. In;:-~ - -n.4T /T1 "',,, ~i" / N "" ~_ ~ .~ ~, ... u's t., f\,) un 1436 0)&>.00.. p~ ... ~J' 0; r- (J'r ,~!Ht W OJ '~43 80 1430 CD .!..!...~ - L.l U39 1~3B N ..... <0 --;.._PO~... ~ I----- f~.(O tV"H ~ --;.. ~ -:- ....~tI>-;:: Ul __ en IJ3:1 ;:; 1-(Q--1 u!u l,Q fJi.2L.l ..". Ui3 (J1 W...._ a'd" ..- U (() CD L...-- / 7 6 ~ ~ - ~C 'fm:' _ /1181 L _ ':::SN -.. ;;;,. ~...."4- ~ ~ 0'... U ~ go ~ ~ s. ~:~ II' iD 1~0O; ..1. ~ '~6f ~-\'" .... ~'" a;...It~ c;.( J ",..." 0>.... ,~ , ,,:;: '\, ~ '" o '" I ~ ~4) --,;:?i ~I-- N,--- (() .. -.....J 0 )>'-;;;; f--;Qn; L I! I r 160~ ~~ ~~ ~ 'dIU '~ l:: ~ i c;. 11i2b ~ -;m ~f - ~ d ~ '" . -< - g; ;w '" ~ - '50 I55r 'toM ----' g: II' ?J f-- 5IiSI ~ '-- 166' '" o '-- 67' 676 -;-50 ~ i4 I ~ ~ s. i'r 1600 160Z CA JmL'- - '''''' <- (lias ,.", =' "'01 N- (() 5V7 -....j~ 1---- CD, .. <n I-- -~ ---'-2 ~:;;:: 1-;::: ., ~ N --- - o ~ ~ o .. o rJJ ""- === ! ~ i ~ i~ I I _ I ~ I~"u ~ ~ l>- ~ ~ ~ ~~~ 0> Q Q - ~ ~ Q 160 ~ .. .. ~~ Hl .CREST AVE:" - "" SAN .{'~ RDlO ",~.:J ~ . ~ : 0~~~<- ~ ~~ '? ~~ " o~~~-;....> ~o ~ --;.~ :;:" ~~ u '" '" '''82 ::::: '''6'7 "'Ii" _ _U'6 14(1,0 ken ~~ (0 I~/~ ~ 1#72 CXt ~<77 '" fln4 -- Fl"'1 ~ ~ ,<78 rr.J 1480 ~ N U8Z 0 UI11 U8-1 U. U811 usz :1: UM; u liGD ;::::; U8Z :: ~ , y~ "" .",~ "'- On Utls...... ...... flU 0 <0 un I r.no 1.0 ~ ~ '-'VI ~ - '477 ....... tv 1.(79 ~ UIH CJ:lo '" IJ8"J w -;.~ .p. ,.,.,~ ::ju ~~ - ,., On ~ '" ~ I~88 ,., 14117 .. I'" '" I , ...., "'\ '" w '" .... :;:::;: let Cae. ~ r.a .. o~ ~ ~ .. .. .. '" [: !:t '" .. ~ .... IU: 00 ....., 111 c..n '" (REST LUcE.p. ~ ~ ~ I ~ '" I _ u "', a ::: ~ a U ,1i1O ?~K ; i.J1 (J) ~ ii <D ~I I~ .. ~(ai)~ ~~ ~ '" U> I ~ L '" 1'", ~ Ig 50 ~ '" .. ~ g .. .. - " ~ .. ~~~~ ~ ~ It; - ~ ~ ~ ~ '- -AK~ DRIVE:'! ~ 60 ~ ~~- r---r-- Q ~ ~ - ~ ;;: <> '" s:: t::l+ :;:0 ~ ~ o n I I II 1..-' N/""" .50 1M(} - - .p. " o 186'.1 , (; !',~~. 60 a; I~~~ .... Q<> ..0 ,~~ 1#561:: ~ L~ Wi" I: 1-/81 ~ - --:-:= U6. 0) ~ en 1472....., ~im ~ ~""'~'Jr;~ 1~?1 :: 1m en Ins en ~ jJ - U8:I ... 1</lJ/.. ~ f"'l .... f.fJjS -tuu<..l~ l>oU89 ~.....~ .. ~-afih5/) ....., /46fJ a ,.,60;:) ~ ,.,., '" a> 1_ ~ ,;;; U '" I a> ....;~O> I S{ rB 231-01 'j ::::j 0; to ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ (") :;:0 rrl tf) ---j ~~ ~ ~e. t I I ;:; -~ , t:~ ;:; I :r> ^ rrl } -0 :r> :;:0 ^ :; 60 It> ~ / ~ ~I 1---""-< 160. ~: T 8882: I I I I I ~@ . u 1lf7g . - . .. ~~~ ~ ""' q, " 50 :s 1~t: ';: ::.: ~ U5I 1154 t3 ~ U5S 1~~!: ~ U68 ~ 8 f.l67 1460 . u~z ~ .. (.#8<1 ~ ~ U45 ~ l-H;fi I: -; us. ~ .;;. 1-489 Ino UI ,:; 1471 _~~"I~ ~ I. ;:: U73......... ~~";;'-I76 U76~'" _ tn? ./78 " /.11. -- 1-100 . lUll '---- 1~.:Z ... .. 1183 ........... '~B.r ... ~ UM 1486 .. UB7 I4Bl1( ~ 00 J'4'~ .. Ugf H9R ... Y f:! ::::;: : ,~g& ~ 80 n J;; g a ~ :;~ ~ ,n< <SH; !! I " I ~ I . fn'f!l J: I I DRg (J1 ,,:~I ~ ~~ ~ '" 80 ~ 0: 1384 k ~ /; N. 1<00 f'..) ''/Ot o 6~ ...../ I~O~ 140./ J'o..J "',. __1406 0:> '::;'0; 1<", '-4' '''' _ f~1 '-I 1416 I fjj~ '" I ::: U r- ....--.- (Jt 00; 1#7 c:n ~ _ 14zr U. UZ3 'as _ 1<10 ~ 1423 , "" --' IJ33 11 a>;'~ 1140 U ...... I~~ N '<1'" '<<3 1-1/6 _== U~7 Ql ,4J9 <> <> N.. SA c: N60JJ CD ~ " 1:: ~ :;: ~ ~ 1<50 :: :::, _Uli~ 7::: ''''' ~ U(lD ..:s 7 fJ60 N~Z, .... . ~ .,..... ;: ;:; H66 I ~ .: :t ;:: I fnt J(~ "l,\.CV;;,- fJU , z:; ~ r;;: L~ ~ 1474 ~11I 1479 L ~ U?B .~. U80 L 5 :.: <i 1~tn 1; u,,~ . ; .- 1-1113 "tIS '~84~ t;; <= <a un ... fJ 1HI '9" flSf ~ U9!t ,.... f-lJlti - f487 --:; fI;; _ ~" 61"- " HGH ANn- N.. I - ~ ~ r '" _ ~ ISOO 1601 ~ ~""506 en ,_ ~ 1SDlJ 0) U 1511 ~ fSl:t CJ'l I~ ~ 16" Ie... " '" 00 U '" ~ '" w ;; ~ ~ o 16ft1 162(1 ...... "" tU-/ aJ 16U .:::; , ~ o rJj ""- == ~: ,sn U> IS'O'" C U;"I-.( u I 1660 ;:; ~ ~ N.. CREST ,ii&; ~ , ~604-...Jot 0> < 1510 '" <> - <> '" N.. ClENWOOO ~ ~ ~ ~ U - t6b en f62D (,() Q t-.) i1 '527 8 ISU 0; (:: u ,....J- 1528 ::::; t ... '"" .. t63.:Z a; 1fT! c.n '5"'~ - t-~ ~ fSSln :: q .... 15<13 CD 15-/ - S.U <: ..... '549 l.O 156 _lIS50 ~ a <:; ___ 1564 :::: i;CJ 0> :;: CD ~ :t a> .... 1 N '5<> ~ 0> U 1580 DO ... o 1670 a ;; ": - :'" 'wo IV o <<"" I~ I ~ I~ 1- 60~._l>!!'" ~ !,. is''' ~-I~ "~: IR,; !l" - - ~. Ava.la:~ae ,orl f510 -.... '" ,- f'l GJ rr: N. '660 " I N ~~.", 0> '" " I 60 iUlJ ()\ ~ -:>- I 670 I LAI<E ()Rf\ 1601 1803 '" o IO, o " '805 160.4 ~ '605 to N 1808 _ '609 0> 16 " Q ~~gg~ ~.<::~~ !:II r-., _0 <;Q ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ " g >- "- l~~ r'."11 . ~ r ~iL:phlll1L' (727) 53()-\l')~ I December 14, 2000 I.tB40 4\11h Slr~~t ,\I\)r] 11. CkilrWillrr. 1"1. ~ /0: ~~~~ Cln~ r' :; ~ rJ e:.- tI~ r../r'~ . \ Mr. Bill Horne, City Manager City of Clearwater P. O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758 RE: PSTA Park Street Terminal Alternate Sites . Dear Mr. Horne, ....., '.... Thank you and your staff for assistance in trying to identify additional pOSsible sitesforthe,lt;?cation of PST A's new downtown terminal. We have reviewed the three sites in great detail. Unforturiat~ly, as our search over the last few years showed us, the sites your staff identified do not meet the cnteria for the new terminal. We had outlined the basic criteria in a letter to Cyndi Hardin, of your staff. Th~ three sites that your staff identified do not meet the size requirements, are outside the downtown area, and would likely not be approved by the federal government, which is teq'uired under the federal grant for this project, We would provide the following specific comments on each site: r , " -----:.....~.._..~-....... ..,----.,-,.._- Site #2: Cleveland Street between Evergreen and Hillcrest ""Ji. This site is smaller than our two-acre minimum requirement and would severely restrict the amount of bus bays as well as the size of the terminal. There are several viable businesses as well as single-fam~y residences that would need to be purchased, condemned, or relocated. Federal regulations prohibit the condemnation of any property for this project. Access to the trafftt'light afHillcrest and Gulf-to~8ay is limited and would restrict our ability to enter and exit ~~e site easily. The existing residential neighbOrhood to the north would likely prevent this site from being approved by the federal gov~rnment. f ,I Site #3: GUlf-to-Bay and ~i"crest between Cleveland and Park This site is smaller than our two-acre mInimum requirement which would restrict the size of our bus terminal. . 00008S64.wPO i i '.! f) F~ (: ,) it ,', n <",iWlfl,,' l.oUJ 1-'.11~ ., e e '; net, ~I !o.. i" ;; if ')nt~(> (,,,'(JU . Mr. Bill Home, City Manager PST A Altemate Terminal Sites December 14, 2000 Page 3 This site has approximately ten viable businesses, several single-family homes, and a multi- unit apartment complex, which would have to be condemned and relocated. Again PST A cannot condemn any property for this project. This block sits on a hill, which presents severe grade problems (for Florida). Buses must be near level for wheelchair ramps to function and for wheelchair patrons to use them easily. This would necessitate somehow terracing or leveling the block to make it usable. The remainder of this block is occupied by seven existing single-family residences, which would likely prevent the federal government from approving this site. Site #4: Gu/f-to-Bay between Highland and DeLeon Street . This site has several viable businesses including a large classic-auto business. a convenience store, and a Laundromat. These businesses, the latter two of which seem to serve the neighborhOOd, would need to be purchased, condemned, or relocated. Gu/f-to-Bay fronts the property, and would provide good access to the east and west. However, the other two streets (Highland and DeLeon) would likely cause problems if used to aCCess Drew Street and points north. The site is directly abutted to the north by existing single.family residences, which again would most likely prevent approval for this site from the federal government. Summary: The three sites each have multiple property owners which would make it very time consuming and expensive for land acquisition, if all of the properties for anyone of these sites could be purchased voluntarily. None of the three sites offers the advantages that the proposed Laura Street site offers, The closest of the three, Site #4, is approximately one mile from the current terminal and the furthest, Site #2, is approximately 1 }l miles from the current terminal. These other sites would result in additional costs as well as cause substantial routing and scheduling revisions. By comparison, the proposed Laura Street site is 3/8 of a mile from the Park Street Terminal. Laura Street offers enough property to accommodate PST A's current needs as well as room for future growth. Additiona', this property allows for on-site stormwater retention, which placed at the west end of the site as proposed, will provide a landscaped and fenced buffer, This buffer will provide a physical and visual separation of the terminal activity as well as the bus movements at that end of the property from the day~care center and apartment complex at the west end of this site.' . 00008S64,WPD . . . P.03 e e Mr. Bill Home, City Manager PSTA Altemate Terminal Sites December 14, 2000 Page 3 As was brought out in the presentation to the Community Redevelopment Agency meeting in November, the representative of the Owner of the property testified that in eleven years no less than six potential buyers have investigated developing this property in various residential projects, including as low-income housing. Each potential developer came to the conclusion that the market would not support residential use on this parcel. With regard to the Park Street Terminal, as you know, this site would not allow for the construction of the new terminal, unless the adjacent County property is available to be utilized for the terminal. The use of the County property as part of this project is problematic because of conflicts between the federal requirements related to the grant to PST A and the County's restrictions on the property. At this time, this issue is still unresolved. We have contacted representatives of the Federal Transit Administration to discuss further the federal restrictions on PST A's participation in a joint project with the City and the County. We were advised that PST A would not be allowed to use the federal funding for this project, except for costs directly associated with the terminal. They advised us that they would review the allocation of the construction costs, even to the extent to ensure that PST A was not contributing to costs of constructing the foundation beyond what is necessary for the terminal. In order for this project to be considered, the City would have to take the lead in resolving the land issue and in managing the construction and maintenance of the parking garage. In consideration of the preceding review and the great amount of time and money that we have expended trying to find a suitable location I we hope that you and your staff will agree with us that the Laura Street site is the logical place for PST A to locate the new downtown passenger terminal. Sincerely, PINELLAS SUNCOAST TRANSIT AUTHORITY I!ih Roger ~eneYI Executive MJS/dmt cc: Alan S. Zimmet, General Counsel Michael J. Siebel, Director of Planning ! '. ! j I i .- { DOOO8564,WPD TOTf=lL P. 03 ~ommunity Redevelopment Agency Agenda Cover Memorandum e Item # ~ Meeting Date: Nov. 13, 2000 ~foJ~lj~ ;eJ ECT/RECOMM EN DATION: Consider and make a recommendation to the City Commission on the request of the Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority to amend the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan from Low Density and Medium/High Residential Districts to PublidGovernment Category at 100 North Greenwood Avenue to allow the construction of a bus terminal. and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. SUMMARY: Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority (PSTA) has requested an amendment to the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan to allow the construction of a bus terminal. The proposed location is on a city block of approximately 3.4 acres bounded by Greenwood Avenue on the east, Booth Avenue on the west, Grove Avenue on the north and Laura Street on the south. PST A proposes this bus terminal to replace the existing terminal located at the northwest corner of Pierce Street and Garden Avenue. A bus terminal is defined as a public transportation facility which requires a PublidGovernmental use category in the Redevelopment Plan. The Greenwood Avenue site is currently designated as Low and Medium/ High residential categories and, therefore, does not permit the development of a bus terminal. The Redevelopment Plan was adopted in 1995 and it established five districts of the redevelopment area, designated land use categories for all property within the redevelopment area, proposed catalyst projects to leverage private investment and prescribed five general goals for downtown redevelopment. The p.oosed bus terminal location is inconsistent with all of these major elements of the Redevelopment F (refer to the attached staff analysis). In summary, the Planning Department finds that the proposed amendment is inconsistent with the Redevelopment Plan for the following major reasons: . The proposed location is central to an existing and planned residential neighborhood and a bus terminal will intrude into this neighborhood with its traffic, noise, pollution and expected secondary impacts such as crime. -fe-opte.F - rfc4.n;/'!ejOZ! . Should a bus terminal be located on the proposed site, the characteristics of the terminal will discourage new residential development and eliminate a major residential block from redevelopment. There is a townhouse project under construction within a block from the proposed site and the proposed Balk townhouse development around town pond is located two blocks to the south. Introducing a commercial use with negative operational characteristics is inconsistent with Budget Purchasing NA Originating Dept: ~ Community Redeve Agency User Dept. Community Rede e opment Agenc Costs N/A Reviewed by: Legal tt!J- Police Oept. NA Total NA Public Works OCM! ACM Funding Source: Capital Improvement Current Fiscal Year Risk Mgmt NA Other NA Operating . I Subm;lIed by, '8oA.t M...~...., o Printed on recycled paper Other Appropriation Code: Rev. 2/98 this residential area. e ' . The proposed location is not conveniently located for major emp'ers and their customers and will likely result in a longer walk for passengers or additional transfers. In addition, the distant peripheral location does not promote the expanded use of transit for new customers nor does it encourage the linkages between downtown, the beach and other parts of the City. The ability to . link downtown activities and downtown parking for transfer to the beach is eliminated through this distant location. . The Redevelopment Plan anticipates public investment to leverage private investment. While PST A does propose a new terminal and a co-location with Greyhound Bus Lines, the choice of location creates more disincentives than the positive circumstances of the new facility. The Community Development Board heard this request at their public hearing of October 17, 2000. There was substantial public testimony by residents and property owners in opposition to the proposed amendment. There were no speakers in favor of the proposal. Reasons for the opposition to the terminal included the potential decline in property values, a decline in the quality of life for residents, the noise and pollution and their effect on the children at a nearby school, the potential crime associated with the terminal in close proximity to residents and inconsistency of the proposed use with the Redevelopment Plan. The Community Development Board unanimously recommended denial of the proposed amendment. In a related action at the same meeting, the Community Development Board reviewed the flexible site plan for the terminal and denied the site plan application. The Board's decision on the site plan is final unless the PST A requests an appeal which would be heard by a hearing officer hired through the Department of Administrative Hearings. . . 2 PL'D3 earwater City Commission Agenda Cover Memorandum .rksession Item #: Final Agenda Item # Meeting Date: Jan. 18, 2001 -'J ECT/RECOMMENDA TION: DENY the request of the Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority to amend the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan from Low Density and Medium/High Residential Density Categories to Public/Government Category at 100 North Greenwood Avenue to allow the construction of a bus terminal and deny adoption of Res. #01-02 o and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. SUMMARY: Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority (PST A) has requested an amendment to the Clearwater , Downtown Redevelopment Plan to allow the construction of a bus terminal. The proposed location is on a city block of approximately 3.4 acres bounded by Greenwood Avenue on the east, Booth Avenue on the west, Grove Avenue on the north and Laura Street on the south. PSTA proposes this bus terminal to replace the existing terminal located at the northwest corner of Pierce Street and Garden Avenue. A bus terminal is defined as a public transportation facility which requires a Public/Government use category in the Redevelopment Plan. The Greenwood Avenue site is currently designated as Low and Medium/ High residential categories and, therefore, does not permit the development of a bus terminal. The Redevelopment Plan was adopted in 1995 and it established five districts of the redevelopment a_ designated land use categories for all property within the redevelopment area, proposed t---( ~ c~st projects to leverage private investment and prescribed five general goals for downtown ~.;~ redevelopment. The proposed bus terminal location is inconsistent with all of these major elements ?...-4eJ.{JI/. of the Redevelopment Plan (refer to the attached staff analysis). 4--,4 Jnt+U. In summary, the Planning Department finds that the proposed amendment is inconsistent with the ? ~ 1>iJ~ ~ Redevelopment Plan for the following major reasons: 'T''l · The proposed location is central to an existing and planned residential neighborhood and a bus terminal will intrude into this neighborhood with its traffic, noise, pollution and expected secondary impacts such as crime. · Should a bus terminal be located on the proposed site, the characteristics of the terminal will discourage new residential development and eliminate a major residential block from redevelopment. There is a townhouse project under construction within a block from the proposed site and the proposed Balk townhouse development around town pond is located two blocks to the south. Introducing a commercial use with negative operational characteristics is inconsistent with this residential area. Reviewed b~ Legal ~ Budget N/A Purchasing N/A Risk Mgmt N/A . - Info Srvc Public Works DCM/ACM Other N/A N/A Originating Dept.. Planning User Dept.: Planning Attachments: Staff Report Costs Total N/A Current FY Funding Source: CI OP N/A Other ,~ v, Submitted by: "D... J J City Manager r;)C,A4~.. -c.. - ~ Printed on recycled paper o None A ro riation Code: . e Agenda Cover Memorandum Summary Sheet LUZOO-03-02 Page 2 . · The proposed location is not conveniently located for major employers and their customers and will likely result in a longer walk for passengers or additional transfers. In addition, the distant peripheral location does not promote the expanded use of transit for new customers nor does it encourage the linkages between downtown, the beach and other parts of the City. The ability to link downtown activities and downtown parking for transfer to the beach is eliminated through this distant location. . The Redevelopment Plan anticipates public investment to leverage private investment. While PST A does propose a new terminal and a co-location with Greyhound Bus Lines, the choice of location creates more disincentives than the positive circumstances of the new facility. The Community Development Board heard this request at their public hearing of October 17, 2000. There was substantial public testimony by residents and property owners in opposition to the proposed amendment. There were no speakers in favor of the proposal. Reasons for the opposition to the terminal included the potential decline in property values, a decline in the quality of life for residents, the noise and pollution and their effect on the children at a nearby school, the potential crime associated with the terminal in close proximity to residents and inconsistency of the proposed use with the Redevelopment Plan. The Community Development Board unanimously recommended denial of the proposed amendment. In a related action at the same meeting, the Community Development Board reviewed the flexible site plan for the terminal and denied the site plan application. The PSTA has requested an appeal of the site plan denial which will be heard by a hearing officer hired through the Department of . Administrative Hearings. The Community Redevelopment Agency reviewed this amendment at their meeting of November 13, 2000 and continued the application until their meeting of January 16, 2001. The CRA's recommendation will be reported at the City Commission meeting. . 2 )mInI~.! Cia) /Jr7IJ; . &zpf7/tntu,~ -, ~?.i:ht ~ jJ/7/71;;-C ~ e ?1~ ~ ~ ~Ie /hPMk..t4k - j//J~;V?;i( vtW/hifP/1 1/1-1110 /Pn?{~ - ~ :Ptt1?)u/C;~ r ~r ~ --#4'J? ~ P~I4M. j1" 1AJu;~ P1~ ~~ j1-le ~ . 1'1 . e : .~ ej04$tt; ~'?/41 1/ .f~ ~crI/ ~ !aJ~~t0 /qkaoc::l:7b~;?G ;n/J ~ /7'1'''~ r U';;?& -~ffF/~CY?Jp ~ /"nY~n~P7/):?160/t!e a5)14tYlM&< pPu-~ - IJ tfj'/l ///1 /; 1>>( j3hfwae Mj/~. hh~ ~ t-1n/n '7 ~ . (jtllfJi-' ~ ~ Pf)' , iJft~ --- tyjJa. ;p~ ~ M#77G /h;j?;ffU ~b~ ~J( cg /07/r ~~~// /iJ//t:;! ~-:/Jz:;;~v/6- tVpJV/ ub/~!IO/I~ . tILIfir/kt ~ tJtJJ7~ .,0 /;"(M';aiI - fir- h /1.dp 01UUt 1hJ~ !jthJM /~Ml121 --- . e e . ~-- ~~azt m~)/~d /0/(J2. a:?) lap /J1"~ ? - ~1!LtJti{ PllmlAtfua:? ~mJ?l#;7'Y , j//-t;- {/J{I//&f !t;wJJ;tJM@ ih~;IxpJJ)jrJ . 'f- OjJf~f~ . !w,tJ)Jl.,/'}lUb/fnhr/U ?l7rl&'///~~ ~~ #l~r- j/NY4a ~j;I?~. (&Y7 ~ &rm ~NPPY~ -- ;f!&</~ /d0 -i/CtludVlIA:Jt?61/7tlla ~~~ (;fW1Jtb~J/Jne -fiffn:i4l&; Mtl4tb . tJ~/~~ />>fP~ ~~r~ ~~AtWl- /ldti~jy;1VJV ~ --""""'III . e I . 317.~ ~ f1tJn 4nlt-1; f?57;j- jh /l1tJtmn~#/7& uJj ~71?fh ~q@4-- , 1- ~$//I?tttftrt/;;--P/1/f//4&/ L4w/~ ~ - I?qq;aa ~ ~ -a;~~~ - pj~f~~~/I/h _ -~;mJn0~~~~ -r f/UJpt/Vj /7JI1 __ d}/t?nd~~;,/~#c? ~ d/P;:f:1i ~A%W' Z - //J4:;9jJ~iJll itJUIk>> ~ 7'a;17nJ-w dL - . ~h - ft~ t/IJ~ /hJJt /?J~ ~m//~ 7l1G~ ~ IZ&:6 t41 CU}/Pr ~ c5) ~/7~ - ~/W?~ ~;h~ ~~bl?G ~ . tkJ P&l7Jhza ~atC CJJ d n711 ?JO/lh~Jo~~dlJh7-1 ay: ~/~ fU&I' ?fi1/l1 /Itf ~ ,4 ~ /1J Jh/L /6 /ltJ:::!: Jm;atvuj /1)&~ IVVVO" ~12~ ~;1~>/;h~jJc!i/:;~ f1-~ ~7--'-'~/7y~J f~ ~ ~ 3- ;fIqollM ~ O)f j nm a-otthJk _ _ ~~ -/JO ~ m/u,e, ~4"/7~ -- /)i) ~rod~ . -~/hp1t'15 UrlJd~ -;;111#1/; I1X' l'WanI ~ ~imaf. ~ ~ad~ qfff/~/idht&Y/~ ~~o/1~t%~~~~ 4;/ii 16 11112&:td- /e _ ' . -- ;()i/~Ui1 OJ 7m-~ tph;JJ;;;? .,- ~J1({)6 ~ ;m~/h~ e . . .- . , ..... e e . RESOLUTION NO. 01-02 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AREA LOCATED IN THE DOWNTOWN AREA OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER; MAKING FINDINGS; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Resolution No. 95-65 adopted by the City Commission of the City of Clearwater on August 17, 1995 established a community redevelopment plan for a certain area in the downtown area of the City of Clearwater (the "Downtown Redevelopment Plan") in full compliance with the requirements of Part III, Chapter 163, Florida Statutes (the "Redevelopment Act") for such plans; WHEREAS, the Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority has requested an amendment to the Community Redevelopment Plan in order to accommodate a proposed transit facility to be located in the Community Redevelopment Area; and WHEREAS, it is appropriate to modify the Plan so that the proposed project be implemented; now, therefore, . BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. Findinqs. Based on information presented to it, the City of Clearwater City Commission does hereby find: (a) The proposed change of land use designation from Low Density and Medium/High Residential to Public/Government, approximately 3.5 acres, is consistent with the overall purpose of the Downtown Redevelopment Plan and is necessary and appropriate to facilitate the proper growth and development of the community in accordance with sound planning standards and local community objectives. (b) The land use plan map, as found on page VI-11 of the Downtown Redevelopment Plan, is revised in the following areas: R.J. Booth's Sub, Blk. 2, Lots 1-6 and Sarah McMullen's Sub, Blk 2, Lots 1-10 less road right-of-way. These parcels are hereby revised from Low Density and Medium / High Residential to Public Government as shown in Exhibit B on the attached map. . (c) The Community Development Board, acting as the Local Planning Authority, met on October 17, 2000, and recommended denial of the proposed modifications to the land use plan, as found in the Downtown Redevelopment Plan, to the City Commission. 1 Resolution No. 99-35 . . . e e (d) The Community Redevelopment Agency Trustees reviewed the proposed modifications on , and have recommended of the proposed amendment to the Downtown Redevelopment Plan. (e) The proposed amendment conforms to and complies with the requirements of the Redevelopment Act. In particular, the amendment: S Displaces no families or other residents; S Conforms to the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Clearwater; S Does not create the need for additional parks and recreational facilities; no inadequacies for such parks and recreational facilities now exist or are anticipated to exist in the future in the area; and S Establishes an opportunity for private redevelopment of the area through the provision of commercial/office/residential development anticipated in the Downtown Redevelopment Plan. Section 2. Extent of Plan Amendment. Only the Land Use Plan of the Downtown Redevelopment Plan revised under Exhibit B is to be replaced, superseded, and amended by this Resolution. Section 3. Adoption of Plan Amendment. Exhibit A depicts existing land use designations in the Downtown Redevelopment Plan. The proposed amendment to the Downtown Redevelopment Plan more fully described in Exhibit B is hereby adopted by the City Commission of the City of Clearwater, Florida. Section 4. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon adoption. 2 Resolution No. 99-35 . . . e PASSED AND ADOPTED this Approved as to form: Leslie K. Dougall-Sides Assistant City Attorney e day of ,2001. Brian J. Aungst Mayor-Commissioner Attest: Cynthia E. Goudeau City Clerk 3 Resolution No. 99-35 e e ~ ~@If- .. jMA~~a<.. c:JJpl~ ([) fry / mK- &r~ 1tm1f ~ /6Y /4f;!~ + mf/M5J1>>tIjC (J) fbr !vw-n pmct /qljtt~nmth" @J-I1vt4 ~?(},la9 '. . /)gr;Jvtl/6 tJWiale ~tL- !?/U?JcI a;fJ:--I-f/?fnl7~ ~2#I. '- . . . e e~U ,~tiCl6 tJ:jb J ~ tHO' CDB Meeting Date: October 17, 2000 Case Number: CRA 00-09-01 Agenda Item: D6 CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION STAFF REPORT BACKGROUND INFORMATION: OWNERS: LOCA TION: REQUEST: PLANS REVIEWED: SITE INFORMATION: PROPERTY SIZE: DIMENSIONS OF SITE: PROPERTY USE: Current uses: Proposed use: ZONING DISTRICT: PLAN CATEGORY: Trust for Rehabilitation and Nurturing Youth and Families, Inc. 1 00 North Greenwood Avenue An amendment to the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan from Low Density Residential and Medium/High Density Residential Categories to Public/Government Category. Site plan submitted by Florida Design Consultants, Inc. 3.48 acres 594 feet deep by 255 feet wide Vacant Public Transportation Facility D, Downtown District CBD, Central Business District Category [avr f}1eJ. M~1\ J(p/)~ fJA! ruu PJav\ Page 1 . . . e e ADJACENT LAND USES: North: Office and single-family residential South: Office, retail and multi-family residential East: Office, retail and residential West: Vacant lot and residential development under construction CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY: The immediate vicinity is a mixture of residential, office and retail uses. ANALYSIS: The purpose of this request is to amend the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan to allow the development of a bus terminal at 100 North Greenwood Avenue for the use of Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority (PST A). A bus terminal is defined as a public transportation facility by the Community Development Code. A public transportation facility requires the site to be designated with the Public/Governmental use category of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan. THe SIte proposed as a bus terminal by PSTA is currently designated as Low and Medium7HIgh Residential land use categories by the Redevelopment Plan and, therefore, does not permit the development of a bus terminal. PSTA proposes a bus terminal on Greenwood Avenue to replace the existing terminal located at the northwest corner of Pierce Street and South Garden Avenue. There is a companion case which requests site plan approval of a proposed Flexible Development application as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Case FL 00- 08-34). Accordingly, this staff report evaluates the amendment to the Redevelopment Plan and the site plan issues are evaluated fully in the companion Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project staff report. The Countywide Plan Rules establish a plan category of "Central Business District" which allows cities to designate the boundaries of their urban center, prepare a specific CBD plan and allow downtown development with mixed uses at densities and intensities greater than in other parts of the City. Since at least 1976 when the first downtown plan was created, the City of Clearwater has identified the downtown as an urban center and the City's principal activity center. Over the years, there have been many downtown plans created with the most recent plan adopted in 1995 entitled "Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan." This Redevelopment Plan is the plan currently in effect and the plan for which an amendment is sought by PST A The Redevelopment Plan establishes five general goals for the redevelopment of downtown. Within each goal, the Plan also establishes objectives and policies as detailed in Section VI. The proposal is evaluated against each goal, as follows: Page 2 e e . 1. People Goal: To redevelop downtown Clearwater into a successful "people place" that attracts, retains, and inspires those of all ages and incomes to use and enjoy the community town center. Analysis: The objectives and policies of this goal highlight the need to encourage new residents to downtown, to encourage employment downtown through convenient transportation and parking, and to become the link among downtown, the City at large and the beach. The proposed PST A bus terminal location is in the middle of an area with existing and planned residential homes and the terminal will intrude into this residential neighborhood by using three local residential streets. The secondary impacts related to the proposed use (e.g. crime, noise, pollution, etc.) will detract from the residential redevelopment potential of the site and surrounding area. This is evidenced, in particular, by police reports for the existing downtown bus terminal which include an average of 27 calls for service per month (this year) for criminal activity (9-1-1, drunkenness, theft, battery, domestic violence, trespassing, fighting, etc.). The proposed bus terminal is located a substantial distance from the major downtown employers, thereby increasing the travel distance for most bus passengers or requiring a transfer at the terminal. The proposed location is a substantial distance from the center of downtown and available parking garages which could facilitate linkages between the City at large and other destinations such as the beach. . In summary, the proposed amendment will allow a bus terminal in a location that will negatively affect existing residential owners and discourage new residential development. Further, the amendment will allow a terminal in a location that is not convenient for its passengers and will create a disincentive for bus travel due to its substantial distance from major employers. The proposed amendment is inconsistent with the People Goal of the Redevelopment Plan. 2. Movement Goal: To redevelop downtown Clearwater with an efficient, high quality, multi-modal movement system with supportive and visually positive terminal and transition facilities for all modes. Analysis: The objectives and policies of this goal establish the need for expanding the role of transit in the downtown. Specifically, objective 2 and its related policy is stated as follows on page VI-3 of the Redevelopment Plan: "Expand the role of transit downtown by linking the regional and local serving system as a means of reducing total reliance on the automobile. Improve the urban design qualities of the PST A facility to more positively relate to downtown. " . The proposed amendment to relocate the PST A facility to this site is not consistent with the goal of expanding the use of transit by new passengers. The proposed location is not central to downtown and will require a longer walk by passengers from their employment to the terminal or require a transfer at the facility. The proposed location is physically unconnected with the Page 3 e e . balance of downtown and will not contribute to the positive synergistic benefits of a downtown activity center. Although the proposal introduces a linkage with the Greyhound Bus Service and would create a new transit facility, the choice of location creates relatively larger disincentives for the general downtown area when balanced against the positive circumstances of a new facility and transit partner. The proposed amendment is inconsistent with the Movement Goal of t~e Redevelopment Plan. 3. Activity Goal: To redevelop downtown Clearwater to provide a broad and diverse set of activity centers that accommodate, stimulate and reinforce residing, working, visiting and purchasing in a great waterfront town setting. . Analysis: The objectives and policies of this goal establish the need for diverse activities encouraging a 24-hour downtown. With new residential development located immediately to the west of this property and new townhouses planned two blocks to the south around town pond, this site's location and size of approximately 3.4 acres make it a prime location for additional residential uses. This site is in the center of several potential residential parcels and could be a part of the northern residential anchor of the downtown. This amendment would eliminate a major potential site for residential development and replace it with a bus tenninal. The proposed amendment would introduce a commercial use with negative impacts into the center of a residential redevelopment area thereby discouraging other residential development from locating on the adjacent parcels. In addition to losing the residential potential, the proposed amendment would introduce a commercial use with external impacts into the center of a residential area. The use, design, operational characteristics and secondary impacts of the bus terminal are inconsistent with the residential character of the area and inconsistent with the Activity Goal of the Redevelopment Plan. 4. Amenity Goal: To redevelop downtown Clearwater to create and enhance a small town center "quality of life" that attracts and sustains a diversity of visual and use elements for cultural, entertainment, recreation and environmental experiences. Analysis: The objectives and policies of this goal establish the need to create the town pond to function both as a stormwater retention facility and as a park and to specifically act as a catalyst for residential development in its vicinity. As described above, the proposed amendment would remove a prime development parcel from residential development at a location that is within walking distance of the town pond with its proposed passive park features. The proposed amendment is inconsistent with the Amenity Goal of the Redevelopment Plan. 5. Opportunity Goal: To redevelop downtown Clearwater to attract and continue a process of value creation action that invests time, dollars, resources and creativity to enhance the value, tax base, image and quality of life for Clearwater. . Analysis: The objectives and policies of this goal establish the need for key development parcels through the private market system while also encouraging public investments in amenities for the downtown. As described above, the proposed amendment would remove from the market a key residential development parcel. In addition, the public investments Page 4 f . . . e e proposed by PST A do not encourage an active vibrant downtown and do not add value to the downtown amenities. The secondary impacts related to this use (crime, loitering, etc.) will negatively impact the quality of life for residents and business owners. The proposed amendment is inconsistent with the Opportunity Goal of the Redevelopment Plan. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: An amendment to the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan is a significant issue and has impacts beyond the borders of the proposed amendment site. In particular, the location of a bus terminal can have a positive effect on a downtown given a location that is integrated with the downtown land uses, is close to its passengers, minimizes the off-site impacts and minimizes noise and air pollution. However, the proposed location is not related to the downtown land use pattern and does not provide the synergistic effects that a transit facility can provide for major downtown employers. In addition, the proposed location is internal to an existing and planned residential neighborhood and utilizes three residential streets for access. The proposed location removes from development potential a prime residential development parcel in close proximity to the town pond and its park amenity. When evaluated with the five goals of the Redevelopment Plan, the proposed amendment is inconsistent with all five goals of the Plan. The application and supporting materials were reviewed by the Development Review Committee on September 7,2000. Planning Staff recommends DENIAL of the request for an amendment to the Clearwater Redevelopment Plan from Low Density Residential and Medium/High Density Residential Categories to Public/Government Category, for the property located at 100 North Greenwood Avenue. Prepared by: Cyndi Hardin, Assistant Planning Director: t' ~A II ^ /' In-+- \ . 01 ~Jl 0 \ t \ ATTACHMENTS: Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity Location Map Future Land Use Map Zoning Atlas Map Application \ IMS2IPDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEXlPending ApplicationslGreenwood N 100 PST A IGreenwood N 1 00 STAFF REPORT CRPA,doc Page 5 . I I I I ~ I I .. I I I I I I I I. - e 2.3.3.8 SPECIAL DESIGNATIONS. CONT. e 2.3.3.8.5 Cate2:orv/Svmbol . Central Business District (CBD). Purpose - It is the purpose of this category to depict those areas of the County that are now designated, or appropriate to be designated, as urban centers for redevelopment in accord with a specific plan therefor. Use Characteristics - Those uses appropriate to and consistent with this category shall include: . Primary Uses - Residential; Office; Commercial; Industrial; Institutional; and TransportationlUtility uses as enumerated in the approved redevelopment plan for an area so designated. - Locational Characteristics - This category is generally appropriate to those central business districts_ designed to serve as the primary retail, financial, governmental, residential, and employment focal point~ for a community; and to reflect those urban centers in the county served by adequate vehicular and mass transit service so as to accommodate their more intensive urban character. Traffic Generation Characteristics - The countywide plan standard for the purpose of calculating typical traffic impacts relative to a plan amendment for this category shall be based upon the actual mix and intensity of land use proposed in the redevelopment plan, calculated by using the appropriate traffic generation characteristics for each corresponding category of land use, adjusted to account for proposed densitylintensity of said land use. Density/Intensity Standards - Shall be as set forth for each classification of use and location in the approved redevelopment plan. Densitieslintensities shall be consistent with the redevelopment strategy and for this plan category shall generally be at or above the highest density/intensity standards of the conventional plan categories for the respective types of use characteristics provided for thereunder. Other Standards - Shall include the following: . Plan Approval - The utilization of this plan category shall require the subject area to be formally designated as a central business district area and a special area plan therefor approved by the local government. The process for plan amendment to employ or alter this plan category shall require recommendation by the PPC and approval by the CPA for the special area plan and any substantive amendments thereto. Minor plan changes that are not considered substantive shall not constitute an amendment to the FLUP, and shall be submitted to the PPC and CPA for receipt and acceptance. Where such plan is prepared pursuant to Chapter 163, Part ill, F.S. all applicable provisions of that process will be complied with prior to review of the redevelopment plan under these Rules. . Plan Content/Criteria - The plan prepared in support of this category shall include as a minimum that information for such special area designation as determined necessary by the Pinellas Planning Council to evaluate the proposed amendment in relationship to the policies. of the Countywide Plan, the assessment of infrastructure impacts and the adequacy of provision therefor and the relationship of the proposed special area plan to the Countywide FLUP and affected local government plans. Countywide Plan Rules 2-51 September 30, 2000 ..-., -co, ' ' '_ .' ...,..,.~ _l-'~~~~"--,~ ,'''L'':_~_~''('~_''''':~'~~~"'''':-_'~:~.~ ~'"","'''IJ;'';l'lf~~'f ""~'-,"'~~~__;_;~'_:~ ~ ".' ': it.;/ (4, ,">,. -<:0-.' ,",. ,,:,':~'~7"--r~'''--:'~''r_~~,~-q;~r~~~~'.i " .'-~ r:,'-'. ~,'~_~"7.:7"-"', ~ ~~~.~~~ ~,_r~ ~ "Jf"';'t~-.~ . . 10k!- Woo ~/~~ 1/idUY~/lfII /?Ia ~:ttm;JJtb / ftltL IJltS-/@ft ~!/&m~l# fJJJYJJh 7f~/h/~1ft #1- fCJ!) ld1~tg t7 /)/Jl 1J1tp;: I1qdz /1f}H!>>l!b ~- #Id/ a~ - ~Af!/~m(fft//--dIZJ)/( ~ lWJ' ~O/t)l#hif21 Z -('5 --- / }/d r . au /tlJO/h?/j... . ~ / --~//~~ vtU//u7q~ ~Wt?k~~~b, 1/ ~j~ Jt &j I>>1Jlhd ~ ~ c>>zf:-#1~/tr ~/~ f/J1 &;1/~ 1Jj;!e,-(];tZI? ~ O>>~~ ~~ ~~~~k- ~) (jj -- em; Iiula ~ i)1~~/- - mc:?~/ 10 ltt&lt# ~ A/2h4:;?~ /~/~ /f1~ t:tk&/J&UJ- ~ ~4/- /1JnJY~/x -j?~ tJ II t/IldtiUb . (ftt .#I/Vf{fr(Ir~ lJZatl;1JIiZt'a/ Ji!url,# ~ '?Jaae (j A;;; ~~ t>>ltf t:J)Zf.. ;o/ooY -252) ~ ~ -- . . . . . . . /1./-1" ~~~~ H/m!l/gJ/7~ &l7$2f/; Wtihliztplky~&un1 )5b~(:/' ~~ ;mf ~I/t{/JC ~7/t:?~ ~~ 'fl1.~.~ );)~~ (P1~ f?It3! ') ~ ~ft) ?to ~ &77 ,4P-#erJY . &J- a/~ytJle 4 mwh~# fflu~ (flm~U/~~) .pt7JJ/ =91 dt:t ecetR ~/t.?Utd CJ? /~~ ;!@~PL.~o~ aqv~ tZ/'11Ud# /J16Jc:/v - VOd t?t0t~ Mf~/?Jm::;/ ~ . ~1f ~~ ~ ~#Jf/~ ~t/11r-/l;&r jJat:6--tl/' ~ ~ tg/am/)Jd -..-. ~ ftdtI Jt/Y /t1,ffl ~h7~J/trtJj ~ - . ~~I/~ U:m/lld1-~~ ~~;It; %$ ~~cmulJ1~m1J-/i/1~ 9ft ~ ff{#/-lkt2. ~/ff /Mk/ ~tff;!f~<.4?t>>Mc. JPy~/nd ~~~ . . . . . . . . /Z./--:?J . (hltf ~ffiIh11fJiJ a IX tfJJe;:J/PHf ~ ~~h~ ~ ;2te5 - ~d. j//Ze tZp/l<<a-. -I- I;; fb'$ W?J;n~ /lJf}Ze J)~ en p '{!!>>J ~ 4~ w~:::t ffhuy.~ ~!-?~Iuj)JJ~~ . ~--- . * ~hlJ-/;&i'tJj ~~j/N/J1~)$fU/c7 . -1 j//~ -Wf}!/JID it%wjf;tu.. ftotJ- ~ - {#J1f . . . . ()rJy; / /y / n?J tUJ/ ~ A- . . ecommuntty Redevelopment Agency Agenda Cover Memorandum ~9;11nr Agenda Item # era.. 3 Meeting Date: August 30. 1999 . SUBJECT/RECOMMEN DA liON: Recommend the City Commission adopt Resolution 99-35 amending the Downtown Redevelopment Plan of the Community Redevelopment Agency. x and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. SUMMARY: . The DowntOwn Re:Jevelopment Plan for the Community Rroevelopment Agercy was crlJptErl on August 17, 1995 ard was most recently arnerdro in October ci 1998. . The area ci the proposed mc:xJification inclOOes two parcels on the north side ci Park Street between Myrtle Avenue ard South GreenwoOO Avenue as well as numerous individual parcels genaally located east ci Myrtle Avenue to South GreenwoOO Avenue ard south of Park Street to d1estnut Street. . The proposed mc:xJifications will incllXie: Amending the lard use of two parcels north of Park Street: from N100ium / High Density Residential to Commercial / Office / Residential; amerding the Iarx:J use of the area ci the proposed pcrd from Open Space / Recreation to Commercial / Office / Residential; ard amerding the lard use designation ci parce/s 10GltErl west ci South Greenwocx:l ard the block located at the northeast mmer ci Myrtle Avenue ard d1estnut Avenue from N100ium / High Density Residential to CommerciaVOffiC8'R.esidential. . The proposed downtown pard will be reconfigured in a manner that is ronsistent ard rompatible with future private redevelopment initiatives within the subject area. s--+t-ff . tv\cdification ci the Plan, as indicata:f in the atIiiCACfJ report will enmurage mixed use development ard will allow the lard use flexibility nea::Jed to meet the City's long range redevelopment plans. . At their regularly scheduled public he4ring on July 20, 1999, the Community ~Iopment Board, acting as the LOGlI Planning AgeI'Cf, reviewed the proposed amerdment ard unanimously recommerx:Jed approval ci Resolution 99-35. . The proposed amerdment is scheduled for review by the City Commission on September 2, 1999. . The proposed amerdment will also be reviewed by the Board ci County Commissie>nelS, acting as the Countywide Planning Authority, on September 14,1999. I' ~W K~a{-\- .c~V~\ \aJ)~ \YlCQ..e(k~p+ Other Originating Dept.: Planning and Developme Services User Dept.: n/~ Planning and D_Jef6rfrffent Services Attachments Costs Reviewed by: Legal \. .l Info Srvc N/A r~+- Budget N/A Public Works N/A Purchasig N/A DCM/ACM Total Current FY Funding Source: CI Risk Mgt N/A OP Other Submitted by: City Manager o Printed on recycled paper ~ Resolution 99-35 \t o None r E/h.4+-B \~e PLtJL A ro riation Code: . . . e e RESOLUTION NO. 99.35 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AREA LOCATED IN THE DOWNTOWN AREA OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER; MAKING FINDINGS; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Resolution No. 95-65 adopted by the City Commission of the City of Clearwater on August 17. 1995 established a community redevelopment plan for a certain area in the downtown area of the City of Clearwater (the "Downtown Redevelopment Plan") in full compliance with the requirements of Part III, Chapter 163, Florida Statutes (the "Redevelopment Act") for such plans; WHEREAS, changing conditions within Clearwater require increased flexibility in I land use in order to facilitate growth and economic development within the Downtown Area; WHEREAS. the boundaries of the proposed Downtown Pond, as indicated in the Downtown Redevelopment Plan, are currently undefined and will be developed in a manner that is consistent with future redevelopment efforts; WHEREAS, in response to changing conditions in the Downtown Area and the need for greater flexibility, modification of the land use plan is required; now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. Findings. Based on information presented to it, the City of Clearwater City Commission does hereby find: (a) The proposed change of land use designation from MediumlHigh Density Residential and Open SpacelRecreation to Commercial I Office I Residential, approximately 48.5, is consistent with the overall purpose of the Downtown Redevelopment Plan and is necessary and appropriate to facilitate the proper growth and development of the community in accordance with sound planning standards and local community objectives. (b) The land use plan map. as found on page VI-11 of the Downtown Redevelopment Plan, is revised in the following areas: two parcels located on the north side of Park Street between Myrtle Avenue and South Greenwood Avenue as well as parcels located east of Myrtle 1 Resolution No. 99-35 . . . e e Avenue to South Greenwood Avenue and south of Park Street to Chestnut Street. These parcels are hereby revised from Medium I High Density Residential to Commercial I Office I Residential. Parcels located In the area of the proposed pond are hereby revised from Open Space I Recreation to Commercial I Office I Residential (as shown in exhibit B on the attached map). (c) The Community Development Board, acting as the local Planning Authority, met on July 20,1999, and recommended approval of the proposed modifications to the land use plan, as found in the Downtown Redevelopment Plan, to the City Commission. (d) The Community Redevelopment Agency Trustees reviewed the proposed modifications on August 19, 1999, and have recommended approval of the proposed amendment to the Downtown Redevelopment Plan. (e) The proposed amendment conforms to and complies with the requirements of the Redevelopment Act. In particular, the amendment: . . Displaces no families or other residents; Conforms to the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Clearwater; Does not create the need for additional parks and recreational facilities; no inadequacies for such parks and recreational facilities now exist or are anticipated to exist in the future in the area; and Establishes an opportunity for private redevelopment of the area through the provision of commerciaVoffice/residential development anticipated in the Downtown Redevelopment Plan. . . Section 2. Extent of Plan Amendment. Only the land Use Plan of the Downtown Redevelopment Plan revised under Exhibit B are to be replaced, superseded, and amended by this Resolution. Section 3. Adootion of Plan Amendment. Exhibit A depicts existing land use designations in the Downtown Redevelopment Plan. The proposed amendment to the Downtown Redevelopment Plan more fully described in Exhibit B is hereby adopted by the City Commission of the City of Clearwater, Florida. Section 4. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon adoption. 2 Resolution No. 99-35 . . . e PASSED AND ADOPTED this Approved as to form: ;:: ~. r I I " .y{~-<- 1/ '1Cf~1~ Leslie K. Dougall-Sid s Assistant City Attorney e day of ,1999. Brian J. Aungst Mayor-Commissioner Attest: Cynthia E. Goudeau City Clerk 3 Resolution No. 99-35 CDD Meeting Date: Agenda Item: m D ~-.-) ~ ~~~ "tlJ?Y . CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMlNISTRA nON STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION OWNER: Various Owners APPLICANT: Planning Department LOCATION: The subject properties are located within the Clearwater's Downtown Area and can be broken down into two general areas which include: (a) Two parcels located on the north side of Park Street between Myrtle Avenue and Greenwood Avenue. These parcels are indicated as # 1 and #2 on the attached proposed Downtown Land Use Plan. (b) An area consisting of numerous individual parcels located east of Myrtle Avenue to South Greenwood Avenue and south of Park Street to Chestnut Street. This area includes #'s 3-6 on the attached proposed Downtown Land Use Plan. . REQUEST: Proposed modifications to the Downtown Redevelopment / Community Redevelopment Agency Plan include the following changes: . Amending the land use of two parcels located north of Park Street from the Medium / High Density Residential to Commercial / Office / Residential (parcels 1 and 2 on attached map). . Amending the land use designation of the area of the proposed pond from Open Space / Recreation to Commercial / Office / Residential (parcels 3 and 5 on attached map). . Amending the land use designation of parcels located west of South Greenwood Avenue as well as the block located at the northeast corner of Myrtle Avenue and Chestnut Avenue from Medium / High Density Residential to Commercial / Office / Residential (parcels 4 and 6 on attached map). SITE INFORMA nON PROPERTY SIZE: Approximately 48.5 acres ofland within the Downtown Redevelopment Area PROPERTY USE Current Use: The subject properties currently consist of a mix of commercial and residential uses. Proposed Use: Commercial, office, and residential uses. . e e PLAN CATEGORY . Current Plan Category: Medium I High Density Residential and Open Space I Recreational Proposed Plan Category: Commercial I Office I Residential ZONING DISTRICT Current Zoning District: Proposed Zoning District: Downtown District (D) Downtown District (D) ANALYSIS Introduction The Downtown Redevelopment Plan for the Community Redevelopment Agency was adopted by Resolution 95-65 on August 17, 1995. The Redevelopment Plan was amended in October of 1998 as the result of changing conditions and facilitate proper growth and development. The Plan divides Clearwater's Downtown Area into five districts and provides a general description of each district. Within the context of each district are land use designations which indicate the type of use permitted within said district. The Plan also indicates the maximum permitted density and intensity per district. Since the Plan was adopted in 1995, changing conditions within the Downtown Area warranted a modification in the Plan to facilitate the proper growth and development and maintain consistency with the overall purpose of the Downtown Plan. The proposed amendments will allow the needed flexibility to better meet the goals of the Redevelopment Plan. These goals are discussed in the following analysis. . Consistency with the Downtown Redevelopment Plan People Goal - To Redevelop downtown Clearwater into a successful "people place" that attracts, retains, and inspires those of all ages to come to use and enjoy the community town center. The Plan strives to create a Downtown that serves as a community gathering place by introducing new residents to downtown through the provision of neighborhoods that contain a mix of uses and housing types. The Plan indicates the proposed downtown pond will become a focal point of this development. The downtown pond is still a viable focal point for downtown development. The proposed amendments will create the flexibility for future developers to configure the pond in a manner most consistent and compatible with the developments design. The Commercial / Office / Residential designation will further the People Goal of the Redevelopment Plan by encouraging a variety of development that will create a successful "people place." Movement Goal- To redevelop downtown Clearwater with an efficient, high quality, multi-modal movement system with supportive and visually positive terminal and transition facilities for all modes. The Movement Goal of the Redevelopment Plan seeks to reduce total reliance on the automobile and improve pedestrian accessibility. The proposed amendment will permit mixed use development including commercial, office, and residential uses. This mix of uses will contribute to pedestrian accessibility via the close proximity of residential development to retail/commercial uses. . e e . Activity Goal - To redevelop downtown Clearwater to provide a broad and diverse set of activity centers that accommodate, stimulate and reinforce residing, working, visiting, and purchasing in a great waterfront town setting. The activity goal of the Redevelopment Plan strives to create a downtown that combines in-town residential opportunities with retail and commercial uses that provide daytime as well as evening activity generation. This could include a mix of office and retail uses that generate daytime activities and hotel or restaurant uses which provide evening activity generation. The proposed amendments will significantly enhance the activity goal of the Redevelopment Plan by permitting a mix of land uses (Commercial! Office ! Retail) that will contribute to both day and evening activity that is needed for a successful downtown. Amenity Goal - To redevelop downtown Clearwater to create and enhance a small town center "quality of life" that attracts and sustain a diversity of visual and use elements for cultural, entertainment, recreation, and environmental experiences. As previously mentioned, a significant factor in the Redevelopment Plan is the proposed downtown pond. The Plan indicates that the pond will serve as a central amenity as well as a residential catalyst. The proposed amendments do not deter from this notion of a central pond but rather provide the opportunity for private redevelopment initiatives to reconfigure the pond in a manner that is more consistent with the development pattern. The pond will continue to serve as a central amenity. The proposed amendment to Commercial! Office ! Residential land use will provide the flexibility to achieve development that optimizes the pond as a central amenity. . Opportunity Goal - To redevelop downtown Clearwater to attract and continue a process of value creation action that invests time, dollars, resources, and creativity to enhance the value, tax base, image and quality of life for Clearwater. An objective of the Redevelopment Plan is to create a positive economic environment to expand existing businesses and attract outside investment. The proposed amendment will allow for a wider variety of permitted uses within the subject area. The Commercial! Office ! Residential land use will provide the flexibility to respond to the development initiatives of the private sector. Consistency with Clearwater's Comprehensive Plan The City's Comprehensive Plan focuses on the use of innovative planned development and mixed use development techniques as a means of promoting infill development. The proposed amendment will encourage mixed use development and will further the redevelopment initiatives of the Comprehensive Plan. Additionally, the City's Evaluation and Appraisal Report, a thorough analysis of conditions within the City, called for increased use of mixed use development and infill development techniques. This amendment will serve to foster such development. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDA nONS The Planning Department recommends approval of the proposed modifications to the Downtown Redevelopment Plan as the modifications meet the goals of the Downtown Redevelopment Plan as follows: . e e . Recommend approval of a land use amendment of Parcels 1,2,4, and 6 from Medium I High Density Residential to Commercial I Office I Residential. . . Recommend approval ofa land use amendment of Parcels 3 and 5 from Open Space I Recreation to Commercial I Office I Residential! Report Prepared By: Teresa Mancini, Planner ~ Assistant Planning Director APPi!t.-..~ Planning Director Approval: I Attachments: Existing Downtown Land Use Plan Proposed Downtown Land Use Plan . . e ttHH ~.rwater . o Interoffice Correspondence Sheet To: Bob Keller, Assistant City Manager From: Lou Hilton, Senior Planner CC: Cyndi Hardin, Assistant Planning Director Date: July 20, 1999 RE: Downtown Redevelopment Plan I have reviewed the proposed amendments to the Downtown Redevelopment Plan including the existing and proposed maps and the associated analysis. I have the following comments concerning the items: Franklin Street is erroneously delineated on the amended map as an existing road right -of -way from Prospect Avenue to South Greenwood Avenue; there is no such road existing or planned. The amended map should be corrected prior to public hearing. . The proposed maps are clearly an improvement to the originally adopted map as included in the original Downtown Redevelopment Plan adopted by Resolution 95-65 as amended. . (I) . e Clearwater City Commission Agenda Cover Memorandum l ~o"""'lon Item': final Agenda Item' pV]3 ~ ...... ED 1- Meeting Date: 1Q~ .---- SUBJECT/RECOMMENDA TION: Adopt Resolution No. 98-47 amending the Community Redevelopment Plan fOT the Community Redevelopment Area by changing the land use designation for property located at 1180 Cleveland Street from office to commercial/office/residential. [g) and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. SUMMARY: The proposal from IMR for use of the property at 1180 Cleveland Street is compatible to the IMR Global Center and a mixed-use designation will give the developer the needed flexibility to fully use this site. Staff will be bringing forward the remainder of the property fronting on Cleveland Street generally located between Missouri Avenue of the east and N. Greenwood on the west. It is anticipated office, residential and commercial uses will occupy this area. . Reviewed bl~ Originating Dept: Costs Legal Info Srvc NA Economic Development Total Budget NA Public Works NA User DepL Funding Source: .rchasing ~ DCMIACM NA CurrentFY CI SIc Mgmt . NA Other Attachments OP Resolution 98-47 Other Exhibit A - Modified Map Submitted by: f'I\."'JR.,fi) riation Code: City Manager o None Rev. 2198 .- e . . RESOLUTION NO. 98-47 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION AMENDING THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AREA LOCATED IN THE DOWNTOWN AREA OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER; MAKING FINDINGS; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Resolution No. 95-65 adopted by the City Commission of the City of Clearwater on August 17, 1995 established a community redevelopment plan for a certain area in the downtown area of the City of Clearwater (the "Downtown Redevelopment Plan") in full compliance with the requirements of Part III, Chapter 163, Florida Statutes (the "Redevelopment Act") for such plans; and WHEREAS, changing circumstances now require modification of said community redevelopment plan as more fully described in attached City Commission Agenda Memorandum attached to this resolution; now, therefore, (a) The proposed change of land use designation from office to commercial/office/residential land uses of property located within the Community Redevelopment Agency boundaries, located at 1180 Cleveland Street, consisting of approximately 1.21 acres existing within the Community Redevelopment Agency boundaries with commercial/office/residential land uses is consistent with the overall purpose of the Downtown Redevelopment Plan and is necessary and appropriate to facilitate the proper growth and development of the community in accordance with sound planning standards and local community objectives. (b) The Community Redevelopment Agency Trustees have recommended approval of the proposed amendment to the Downtown Redevelopment Plan. (c) The proposed amendment conforms to and complies with the requirements of the Redevelopment Act. In particular, the amendment: . Displaces no families or other residents; . Conforms to the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Clearwater; ~. Resolution No. 98-47 ~ . . " . · Does not create the need for additional parks and recreational facilities; no inadequacies for such parks and recreational facilities now exist or are anticipated to exist in the future in the area; and · Establishes an opportunity for private redevelopment of the area through the provision of support services for the commercial/office/residential development anticipated in the Downtown Redevelopment Plan as well as creating an opportunity for a private partnership that will result in the private provision of an urban office complex and associated facilities. Section 2. Extent of Plan Amendment. Only those sections and pages of the Downtown Redevelopment Plan revised under Exhibit A are to be replaced, superseded, and amended by this Resolution. Section 3. Adoption of Plan Amendment. The proposed amendment to the Downtown Redevelopment Plan more fully described in Exhibit A is hereby adopted by the City Commission of the City of Clearwater, Florida. Section 4. Effective date. This resolution shall become effective immediately upon adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 1st o c.ro &eI( day of SCP~II,bf!f, 1998. /s/ Rita Garvey Rita Garvey, Mayor-Commissioner Approved as to form: p~e~ f Akin, City Attorney Attest: /s/ Cynthia E. Goudeau Cynthia E. Goudeau, City Clerk 2 Resolution No.98-47 10-31-00; 5;29PMjCI'Y CLERK DEPT. e . 727 562 4086 e' (6f~ . J I] ItN" ': .J f Clearwater City Commission Agenda Cover Memorandum I J . I 5/fi? eM MC'l'flnIlD.IIl" SUBJECT: Resolution 98~ 10, Community Redevelopment Agency Plan Modifications amending the Community Redevelopment Plan for the Community Redevelopment Area RECOMMENDATION/MOTION: Adopt Resolution 98-10 amending the Community Redevelopment Plan for the Community Redevelopment Area. I!.I and that tile appropriate officials Ix! aulhorized to execute samt!. BACKGROUND: · The Downtown Redevelopment Plan for the Community' Redevelopment Agency was adopted by Resolution 95-65 which includes Commercial/Office/Residential and a small portion of low Density Residential land uses at the annex site. · The proposed modification of the area between Missouri Avenue and Greenwood Avenue, from Court Street to Cleveland Street, (rom Low Density Residential to Commercial/Office/Residential, will enable the Community Redevelopment Agency to better focus on land use opportunities in the Urban Center Eastern Corridor. · The proposed modifications will: eliminate the recommended Entertainment Center on the annex property site; eliminate the Cleveland Street/Greenwood Avenue rotary intersection; the proposed angled street system east of Greenwood Avenue; and the diagonal road system in the subject area. A new road system will be developed later as new development unfolds. · Modification of the Plan will allow needed land use flexibility that will better serve the City's long range redevelopment plans and will meet one of the City's Goals - Economic Development. · The modifications to the plan may need to be reviewed by other agencies i( determined legally necessary. Rm-ed by: LepI 8ucIpt ~ .isIi: 104"'" IS ACM 01'- Ori~ ;;."..;....;, User ~rtmenl: C~(s: Commission ActiOn: o Appo'o~ o ~ed wfConditioni o DMied (] CoolinlM!d 10: J.! JJ h'P. I 'I~ loul Currftll f ilC.lI h.ar Funding Sourc...: CI C....II......_' o ap...'inK: (] Othc-t, AnM;h_t~ R-.lutloft '93-lO AcMt11Md: o.tr. 'oIpCr. o NoClt~ "fleeted PMf_ o NoClfW C Not It..,nd Wlmitkd ~ App'opri.lllon Code- O~O'H! oe, ........ o ......... _ rwqdM pIpft' # 2/ 2 e e . . . . e e . RESOLUTION NO. 98-10 ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA AMENDING THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AREA LOCATED IN THE DOWNTOWN AREA OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER; MAKING FINDINGS; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Resolution No. 95-65 adopted by the City Commission of the City of Clearwater on August 17, 1995 established a community redevelopment plan for a certain area in the downtown area of the City of Clearwater (the "Downtown Redevelopment Plan") in full compliance with the requirements of Part 111, Chapter 163, Florida Statutes (the "Redevelopment Act") for such plans; and WHEREAS, changing circumstances now require modification of said community redevelopment plan; now, therefore, . BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER. FLORIDA: Section 1. Findings. Based on information presented to it. the City of Clearwater City Commission does hereby tind: ~') (a) The proposed change of land use designation from low density residential to commcrcial/otlice/residentialland uses of property located within the Community Redevelopment Agency boundaries, generally located within the southwest comer of Cleveland Street and Missouri Avenue as shown on the attached colored map. and bounded by Court Street to the south and Greenwood A venue to the west. consisting of approximately 9.6 acres existing \\ithin the Community Redevelopment Agency boundaries \\;th commerciallotliceiresidentialland uses is consistent with the overall purpose of the Downtown Redevelopment Plan and is necessary and appropriate to facilitate the proper gro\..1h and development of the community in 'accordance \\;th sound planning standards and local community objectives. (b) The Communi!)' Redevelopment Agency has recommended approval of the proposed amendment to the Do\\l1tO\..l1 Redevelopment Plan. (c) The proposed amendment conforms to and complies \\;th the requirements of the Redevelopment Act. In particular. the amendment: . Displaces no families or other residents; . Conforms to the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Clearwater. . Does not create the need for additional parks and recreational facilities: no inadequacies f(\r such parks and recreational facilities now exist or arc anticipated to exist in the future in the ilf':a; and ".) e e . ~ · Establishes an opportunity for private redevelopment of the area through the provision of support services for the commercial/office/residential development anticipated in the Downto\\ll Redevelopment Plan as well as creating an opportunity for a private partnership that will result in the private provision of an urban office complex and associated facilities. Section 2. Extent of Plan Amendment. Only those sections and pages of the Downtown Redevelopment Plan revised under Exhibit A are to be replaced, superseded, and amended by this Resolution. Section 3. Adontion of Plan Amendment. The proposed amendment to the Downtown Redevelopment Plan more fully described in Exhibit A is hereby adopted by the City Commission of the City of Clearwater, Florida. Section 4. Effective date. This resolution shall become effective immediately upon adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of January .1998. . '-' Approved as 10 form: Attest: ~(. Jj~.M~ C)~hia E.. Goud~au Ciry Clerk ....J qff-/() .' e e . UO.. 'Iill ~ ~~~!: Iii III ~~g~. 111111 ..' " I ;: I ::: ::: I ~ ~ ff":. f- Z c.. - ; g ~ I'; _ f- ' -~" -' ::; ;; ~ ~I =- -: 0 L:.;..,j ~ v c ~:.. ~ , , -; . , n ~ I : , r ~ I ' ~ t.1 ~ I ...;~ 3 : I I: I ! :: ~ ~ ~ ;;', . : .~ It lldl ==!:~:..=.=:~-.::: -- . ,I .~ --- . -~=-- :::!.". ~---- !". '<7\..... ...... - -------. ,". .~.... ~,<t:. -- l . ..~Jor' _. - ---~ .-;::. .' ~~:: _'. ~,_._ __n'_' _~_ .-)". _....__.-MC. j I ( 1 :.-..-.t .; , (~.:.' 1'\ r. .). ..> -- . ( n:I1!BlT :, 1'-- - e e . COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING CITY OF CLEARWATER January 12, 1998 Present: Rita Garvey J. B. Johnson Robert Clark Ed Hooper Karen Seel Bob Keller Michael J. Roberto Pamela K. Akin Cynthia E. Goudeau Patricia O. Sullivan Chair/CRA Trustee CRA Trustee CRA Trustee CRA Trustee CRA Trustee Assistant City Manager/CRA Director City Manager City Attorney City Clerk Board Reporter The Chair called the meeting to order at 1:10 p.m. at City Hall. To provide continuity for research, items are in agenda order although not necessarily discussed in that order. ITEM #2 - Approval of Minutes . ." ", ITEM #3 - New Business a) Downtown Redevelopment/Community Redevelopment Plan Modifications Trustee Seel moved to approve the minutes of the meetings of November 17,1997, and December 4, 1997, as recorded and submitted in written summation by the City Clerk to each Trustee. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. On August 17, 1995, the CRA (Community Redevelopment Agency) adopted the Downtown Redevelopment Plan by Resolution #95-65. The plan includes Commercial/Office/Residential and a small portion of Low Density Residential land uses at the former annex site. The subject area, bordered by Missouri and Greenwood avenues and Court and Cleveland streets, includes approximately 9.6 acres within the CRA boundaries. The proposed modification from Low Density Residential to Commercial/ Office/Residential will improve the CRA's focus on land use opportunities in the Urban Center Eastern Corridor. Proposed modifications include eliminating: 1) recommended Entertainment Center on the former annex property site; 2) Cleveland Street/ Greenwood Avenue rotary intersection; 3) angled street system East of Greenwood Avenue; and 4) diagonal road system in subject area. As development unfolds, a new road system will be developed. Modification of the Plan will allow needed land use flexibility to better serve the City's long range redevelopment plans and meet the City goal of Economic Development. If necessary, other agencies may need to review the Plan modifications. . Assistant City Manager/CRA Director Bob Keller said based on responses to the RFP (Request for Proposal), the Selection Committee recommended negotiation with Justice Corporation to locate IMR (Information Management Resources), which currently is in Countryside, at the former annex site. The City's initial contact with the company was during a mcr0198 1 01/12/98 e e . visit by Mr. Keller and Commissioner Clark. Subsequent meetings have occurred with staff, Justice Corp., IMR, and individual City Commissioners. Justice Corporation has proposed to locate the IMR Global Center consisting of separate facilities: 1) world corporate headquarters; 2) research & development operation; and 3) training and education site at the former annex site. By December 31,2001, the firm proposes to hire 560 new employees with salaries averaging above $40,000. Mr. Keller said these are value added jobs for the City. The proposal includes a tight time frame. Work on an agreement has begun. The City Attorney will be the CRA's prime negotiator. A deal is not guaranteed. He was confident Justice Corp. and IMR are serious regarding their proposal and did not think they currently are considering another site. The project will come back to the CRA in stages. Primary decisions need to be made in mid-February. Trustee Hooper moved to approve the proposed modifications to the Downtown Redevelopment/Community Redevelopment Agency Plan and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. b) Justice Corporation Proposal . Five firms submitted proposals in response to the RFP/Q (Request for Proposals/Qualifications) for the former annex site. The Selection Committee reviewed the proposals and, based on criteria established in the RFP/Q, recommended negotiating with the Justice Corporation. This action does not constitute acceptance of the Justice Corporation proposal. Staff anticipates a proposed development agreement will be submitted to the CRA on February 17, 1998, requesting approval of the Justice Corporation proposal, detailing terms and conditions. In response to a question, the City Manager said the incentives and the resulting costs to taxpayers may change during the negotiations. He said time is the key element of concern for the company. Staff is determining the full cost of each item in the proposal. Location of retention, on or off site, also will determine costs. In response to a question, the City Manager said the cost of off-site retention would be part of the impact fees. A short term resolution to this issue is needed. It was felt initial enthusiasm for this projected has waned due to many questions. Concern was expressed regarding an alternative site for the main library. It was noted this proposal would bring desirable activity to Clearwater. More facts were requested before further decisions were made. The City Manager said the new Main Library will be an integral part of Downtown. Staff will bring to the Commission a list of issues to prioritize including: 1) Penny for Pinellas projects; 2) downtown pond; and 3) site for the new Main Library. Due to the dynamics of this proposal and the architectural planning needs of the firm, this issue needs to be resolved. He said the library needs to be located where it will be an asset to the downtown endeavor. The City Attorney noted no conflict of interest affects Trustee Seel's participation regarding this issue. According to the statute, a 2nd cousin is not considered a relation and the involvement of a former business partner in a project does not create a conflict. . mcr0198 2 01/12/98 r- - . . . e e In response to a question, Senior Planner Lou Hilton said the annex property has been assessed at over $3-million. He said the estimated taxes of $92,000 a year is based on how the property is developed. It was suggested the County be asked to come to the table to help cover the impact fees. The City Manager said discussions with the County are ongoing. The County is a partner in the aTI (Qualified Target Industry) Tax Refund. It was noted taxpayers will benefit by this property's return to the tax rolls as well as the additional jobs. It was stated the need for a new Main Clearwater Library will not be forgotten. Trustee Clark moved to accept staff's recommendation to negotiate with the Justice Corporation. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. c) Notify City of Clearwater of the intent to accept Justice Corporation Proposal Florida Statute 163.380(3) requires the CRA to provide the governing body notification of its intent to accept such proposal, not less than 30 days prior to the acceptance of a proposal. This item is contingent on CRA approval to accept the Justice Corporation proposal. The CRA has authorized negotiations between staff with Justice Corporation. The CRA anticipates it will consider approval of a development agreement on February 17, 1998. Trustee Johnson moved to approve notification by the CRA to the City of Clearwater of the intent to accept the proposal submitted by the Justice Corporation, subject to the negotiations of a development agreement. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. d) Request for Authorization for Outside Counsel The City Attorney requested authorization to retain outside counsel in the matter of the development of the annex site: William Pence, Esquire, of Akerman, Senterfitt & Eidson, P.A. regarding environmental matters and David Cardwel, of Holland & Knight, regarding the CRA development agreement. Trustee Seel moved to authorize retaining William Pence and David Cardwel as outside counsel in the matter of the development of the annex site. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. ITEM #4 - Assistant City ManaQer Verbal Reports Administrative Support Manager Diane Smith said results of the DDB's (Downtown Development Board) straw poll indicate the Downtown Alliance was approved by a vote of 115 to 26. Staff is moving forward with the alliance. DDB members appointed to the Downtown Alliance are: 1) Alan Bomstein; 2) David Stone; 3) Glen Warren; and Roger Woodruff. Information on the Downtown Alliance will be brought forward to the CRA in March. Ms. Smith indicated the office space recruitment program located 150,000 square feet of vacant office space. Potential leases for approximately 109,000 square feet are under negotiation. In response to a question, Mr. Keller said the next step in forming the Downtown Alliance requires a review of legal issues. The matter will be brought back in March. ITEM #5 - Other Business - None. mcr0198 3 01/12/98 e e The CRA's Downtown Redevelopment Plan, adopted by Resolution #95-65, includes Commercial/Office/Residential and a small portion of Low Density Residential land uses at the annex site. The proposed modification of the area bordered by Missouri and Greenwood Avenues and Court and Cleveland Streets from Low Density Residential to Commercial/Office/Residential, will allow the CRA to focus better on land use opportunities in the Urban Center Easter Corridor. The proposed modifications will eliminate: 1) the Entertainment Center on the annex site; 2) the Cleveland Street/Greenwood Avenue rotary intersection; 3) the angled street system east of Greenwood Avenue, and 4) the area diagonal road system. A new road system will be developed as new development unfolds. Modification of the Plan will allow needed land use flexibility that will serve the City's long range redevelopment plans and meet the City goal of Economic Development. If determined legally necessary, other agencies may need to review the modifications. Commissioner Johnson moved to amend the Community Redevelopment Plan for the Community Redevelopment Area and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. . The City Attorney presented Resolution #98-10 and read it by title only. Commissioner Hooper moved to pass and adopt Resolution #98-10 and authorize the appropriate officials to execute same. The motion was duly seconded and upon roll call, the vote was: "Ayes": Johnson, Clark, Hooper, Seel and Garvey. "Nays": None. ITEM #38 - Special Events Grant Fundinq - Pilot Program Recommendations (eM) In keeping with the City's vision to enhance Clearwater's "environment with festive activities," the Special Events Granting Program is designed to encourage new and expanded events and to provide a systematic approach of granting City co-sponsorships for special events on an annual basis. The goal is to provide matching grants funding for Clearwater non- profit organizations so they may facilitate new or expanded events which will benefit the organization and citizens of Clearwater. The pilot program provides $50,000 for eligible applicants. Grants will be awarded in variable increments with a maximum of $10,000 per event. Funds will be awarded on a matching basis of 2 to 1. Matching funds may be in the form of in-kind services or cash. If City services such as Police, Fire, Parks & Recreation services, etc. are requested, such services must be estimated and included in the grant funding request. City co-sponsorships on in-kind services will not be provided in addition to grants. . ~ro \~\ d~\fI~'t. mcc0198 16 01/15/98 . . . 1 \.. I"'Th. 'Ih' I ... ~... I <Ii ~ll-' I') ~ I 1~:X..J(I.Jqlh SIr\.'...'I "'r1h ("II.'JT\4,I1\:r 1-"1. ~~-h~ :'\I~ r.\\ 17:"',:' ~~"'''I RECEIVED ~_ ~ 2 3 August 19. 1999 CITY MANAGER'S OFACE Mr. Bob Keller Assistant City ManagerlEconomic Development City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758 Dear Bob: As a follow-up to our meeting, this is to let you know that PST A is interested in utilizing the Town Pond for drainage from the new Park Street Terminal site (future construction project). Our interest is predicated on the fact that no SWFWMD permit will be required and there will be no storm water fees other than the one-time initial cost - We would expect that a formal agreement wiU have to be executed and would appreciate reviewing this prior to formal approval. Sincerely, PINELLAS SUNCOAST TRANSIT AUTHORITY I!!::eeney Executive Director RS:mn Cc: Michael Siebel, PSTA Director of Planning ,I.BlIC WORKS AD~JN/STR4!ION . . . e e DIVISION 9. DOWNTOWN DISTRICT ("D") Section 2-901. Intent and purpose. The intent and purpose of the Downtown District is to establish a mixed use downtown where citizens can work, live, and shop in a place which is the economic, governmental, entertainment and cultural focal point of a liveable city. Section 2-901.1. Maximum development potential. It is the intent of the Downtown District ("D") that development be consistent with the Countywide Future Land Use Plan as required by state law. The development potential of a parcel of land within the D District shall be determined by the standards found in this Development Code as well as the Countywide Future Land Use Designation of the property. For those parcels within the D District that have a Future Land Use of Central Business District ("CBD"), maximum development potential shall be as set forth for each classification of use and location in the approved redevelopment plan. Section 2-902. Flexible standard development. The following uses are Level One permitted uses in the Downtown District subject to the standards and criteria set out in this section and other applicable provisions of Article 3. Table 2-902. "D" Flexible Standard Development Standards Use Max. Min. Height Off-Street (ft.) Parking Accessory Dwellings n/a n/a Alcoholic Beverage Sales 30--50 3--5 per 1,000 GFA Attached Dwellings 30--50 1-1.5 per unit Convention Center 30-50 5 per 1,000 GFA Governmental Uses 30 50 3 5 per 1,000 GF A Nightclubs 30--50 3--10 per 1,000 GFA Offices 30--50 1--3 per 1,000 GFA Overnight Accommodations 30--50 .75--1 per unit 1 e e Parking Garages and Lots 50 n/a Parks and recreation facilities 50 1 per 20.000 SF land area or as determined by the Community Development Coordinator based on ITE ~anual standards Places of Worship 30--50 .5--1 per 2 seats Public Facilities 30 50 1 2 per 1,000 GFA Public Transportation 10 n/a Facilities Restaurants 30--50 5--15 per 1,000 GFA Retail Sales and Service 30--50 2--4 per 1,000 GFA Sidewalk Vendors n/a nla Utility/Infrastructure Facilities n/a n/a . Flexibility standards: . A Accessory dwellings. One accessory dwelling, which is subordinate and accessory to a principal permitted use provided that: 1. Title to the accessory dwelling is vested in the ownership of the principal use; 2. The floor area of the accessory dwelling does not exceed 25 percent of the floor area of the principal use. B. Alcoholic beverage sales. 1. Height: The increased height results in an improved site plan and/or improved design and appearance; 2. Off-street parking: a. The physical characteristics of a proposed building are such that the likely uses of the property will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required or the physical context, including adjacent buildings and uses, are such that there is a high probability that patrons will use modes of transportation other than the automobile to access the use; . 2 e e b. Adequate parking is available on a shared basis as determined by all existing land uses within 1,000 feet of the parcel proposed for development or parking is available through any all existing or planned and committed parking facilities and or the shared parking formula in Article 3, Division 14; . 3. Design. a. All street frontage is designed and used for commercial purposes; b. The design of all buildings complies with the Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. C. Attached dwellings. 1. Height: The increased height results in an improved site plan and/or improved design and appearance; 2. All street frontage is designed and used for commercial purposes or is designed so that the use functions in a way which will contribute to an active urban street environment; 3. Off-street parking: Adequate parking is available on a shared basis as determined by all existing land uses within 1,000 feet of the parcel proposed for development, or parking is available through any al-l-existing or planned and committed parking facilities and or the shared parking formula in Article 3, Division 14; . 4. The design of all buildings complies with the Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. D. Convention center. 1. The convention center is located on a parcel of land which is at least two acres in sIze; 2. Height: The convention center building will not obscure overwater vistas of any existing individual residential unit with a floor height of 3 5 feet; 3. Design. a. The facades of the convention center building or off-street parking facilities which serve the convention center are designed and used for commercial purposes; b. The design of all buildings complies with the Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. . 3 e e F E. Nightclubs. . 1. Height: The increased height results in an improved site plan and/or improved design and appearance; 2. Off-street parking: a. The physical characteristics of a proposed building are such that the likely uses of the property will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required or the physical context, including adjacent buildings and uses are such that there is a high probability that patrons will use modes of transportation other than the automobile to access the use; b. Adequate parking is available on a shared basis as determined by all existing land uses within one thousand (1,000) feet of the parcel proposed for development, or parking is available through any all existing or planned and committed parking facilities aREi or the shared parking formula in Article 3, Division 14; 3. Design: a. All street frontage is designed and used for commercial purposes; . b. The design of all buildings complies with the Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. G E. Offices. 1. Height: The increased height results in an improved site plan and/or improved design and appearance; 2. Off-street parking: a. Adequate parking is available on a shared basis as determined by all existing land uses within 1,000 feet of the parcel proposed for development, or parking is available through any all-existing or planned and committed parking facilities aREi or the shared parking formula in Article 2, Division 14; b. The physical characteristics of a proposed building are such that the likely uses of the property will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required or that the use of significant portions of the building will be used for storage or other non-parking demand-generating purposes. . 4 e e 3. Design: . a. All street frontage is designed and used for commercial purposes; b. The design of all buildings complies with the Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. II G. Overnight accommodations. 1. Height: The increased height results in an improved site plan and/or improved design and appearance; 2. All street frontage is designed and used for commercial purposes; 3. Off-street parking: Adequate parking is available on a shared basis as determined by all existing land uses within 1,000 feet of the parcel proposed for development, or parking is available through any aI-l-existing or planned and committed parking facilities iHi€l or the shared parking formula in Article 3, Division 14; 4. The design of all buildings complies with the Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. I H. Parking garages and lots. . 1. The parcel proposed for development is not contiguous to land designated as residential in the Zoning Atlas; 2. Access to and from the parking garage or lot shall be based on the findings of a transportation analysis approved by the City is by way of a side street; 3. The parking garage or lot is designed and located so that there arc at least ten stacking spaces available for cars waiting to pass through a parking ticket dispenser or booth to enter the garage or lot shall be based on the design and size of the garage or lot; 4. Any frontage along a public street is designed and improved to be similar in character and use to other uses and structures fronting on each street for a distance of 250 feet in either direction along the street or the nearest intersections, whichever is less; 5. Parking structures are designed, constructed and finished so that the structure of the garage is architecturally compatible with the design and character of adjacent principal uses; . 6. The design of all buildings complies with the Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. 5 e e 1. Parks and recreation facilities. . 1. The proposed use is compatible with the surrounding properties. 2. Off-street parking is screened from adiacent parcels ofland and any street by a landscaped wall or fence of at least four (4) feet in height. 3. All outdoor lighting is designed so that no light fixtures cast light directly on adjacent land used for residential purposes. 4. Adequate parking is available on a shared basis as determined by all existing land uses within 1.000 feet of the parcel proposed for development. or parking is available through any existing or planned and committed parking facilities or the shared parking formula in Article 2. Division 14. J. Places of worship. ~ 1. Access: The use of the parcel proposed for development will not involve direct access to a major arterial street; 4 2. Height: a. The increased height results in an improved site plan, landscaping areas in excess of the minimum required and/or improved design and appearance; . b. The increased height will not reduce the vertical component of the view from any adjacent residential property; ~ 3. Off-street parking: The total number of off-street parking spaces including off-site parking spaces within 600 feet of the parcel proposed for development will be available on a shared basis to meet the peak period demands of the facility; 61. The design of all buildings complies with the Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. b K. Public transportation facilities. 1. The public transportation facilities are not located within 1,000 feet of another public transportation facility unless necessary to serve established transit stops with demonstrated ridership demand; . 6 e e The public transportation facilities are designed, located and landscaped so that the structure of the facilities are screened from view from any residential use or land designated as residential in the Zoning Atlas; 3. Any lighting associated with the public transportation facilities is designed and located so that no light is cast directly on any residential use or land designated as residential in the Zoning Atlas; 4. The design of all buildings complies with the Downtown District design guidelines in Division 4 of Article 3. MI". Restaurants. 1. Height: The increased height results in an improved site plan and/or improved design and appearance; 2. All street frontage is designed and used for commercial purposes; 3. Off-street parking: a. The physical characteristics of a proposed building are such that the likely uses of the property will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required or the physical context, including adjacent buildings and uses are such that there is a high probability that patrons will use modes of transportation other than the automobile to access the use; . b. Adequate parking is available on a shared basis as determined by all existing land uses within 1,000 feet of the parcel proposed for development, or parking is available through any all existing or planned and committed parking facilities ami or the shared parking formula in Article 3, Division 14; 4. The design of all buildings complies with the Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. N M. Retail sales and service. 1. Height: The increased height results in an improved site plan and/or improved design and appearance; 2. Off-street parking: a. The physical characteristics of a proposed building are such that the likely uses of the property will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required or the physical context, including adjacent buildings . 7 e e and uses are such that there is a high probability that patrons will use modes of transportation other than the automobile to access the use; . b. Adequate parking is available on a shared basis as determined by all existing land uses within one thousand (1,000) feet of the parcel proposed for development, or parking is available through anyal-l existing or planned and committed parking facilities afl€l or the shared parking formula in Article 2, Division 14; 3. The design of all buildings complies with the Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. G N. Sidewalk vendors. I. The location of the sidewalk vendor does not impair pedestrian movement; 2. The land occupied by a sidewalk vendor is not designated or used for required off-street parking. p O. Utility/infrastructure facilities. 1. No above ground structures are located adjacent to a street right-of-way; 2. Any above ground structure other than permitted telecommunication towers and utility distribution lines located on or along a rear lot line shall be screened from view by a landscaped opaque wall or fence which is at least two-thirds the height of the above ground structure and shall be landscaped with trees which will five years after installation substantially obscure the fence or wall and the above ground structure; . 3. Any above ground structure other than permitted telecommunication towers and utility distribution lines located on or along a rear lot line shall be screened from view by a wall which is an extension of an architectural treatment of a principal building; 4. The design of all buildings complies with the Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. Section 2-903. Flexible development. The following uses are Level Two permitted uses in the Downtown District subject to the standards and criteria set out in this section and other applicable provisions of Article 3. I Table 2-903. "D" District Flexible Development Standards I . 8 e e . Use Max. Min. Height Off-Street (ft.) Parking Alcoholic Beverage Sales 30-100 3--5 per 1,000 GFA Attached Dwellings 30-100 1--1. 5 per unit Comprehensive Infill 30 100 n!a 0 15 per 1,000 GFA Redevelopment Project ill Determined by the Community Development Coordinator based on the specific use and/or ITE Manual standards Educational Facilities 30-100 4/1000 GF A Governmental Uses 30-100 3--5 per 1,000 GFA Indoor recreation! 30-100 3- -5 per 1.000 GFA Entertainment facility Limited Vehicle Sales and 30 2- - 4 per LOOO GFA Display Nightclubs 30-100 3-10 per 1,000 GFA Offices 30-100 1-3 per 1,000 GFA Overnight Accommodations 50-100 .75--1 per unit Public Facilities 30-100 1-2 per 1,000 GFA Restaurants 30-100 5-15 per 1,000 GFA Retail Sales and Service 30-100 2-4 per 1,000 GFA Telecommunication Towers Hla--Refer to Section 3-2001 n!a . (1) Any use approved for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Proiect shall be permitted by the underlying Future Land Use Plan Map designation. Flexibility standards: A. Alcoholic beverage sales: . 9 e e I. Height: a. The parcel proposed for development is located to the west of Myrtle, south of Drew and north of Court; . b. The increased height results in an improved site plan and/or improved design and appearance; 2. All street frontage is designed and used for commercial purposes; 3. Off-street parking: a. The physical characteristics of a proposed building are such that the likely uses of the property will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required or the physical context, including adjacent buildings and uses are such that there is a high probability that patrons will use modes of transportation other than the automobile to access the use; b. Adequate parking is available on a shared basis as determined by all existing land uses within 1,000 feet of the parcel proposed for development, or any parking is available through any all existing or planned and committed parking facilities afld or the shared parking formula in Article 2, Division 14; 4. The design of all buildings complies with the Downtown District design guidelines in Division 4 of Article 3. . B. Attached dwellings. 1. Height: a. The parcel proposed for development is located to the west of Myrtle, south of Drew and north of Court; b. The increased height results in an improved site plan and/or improved design and appearance; c. The height may be increased to one hundred and fifty feet (150') if the parcel proposed for development fronts on Clearwater Bay or is only separated from Clearwater Bay by a public open space or right-of-way. 2. All street frontage is designed and used for commercial purposes or is designed so that the attached dwellings function in a way which will contribute to an active urban street environment; 3. Off-street parking: . 10 e e . a. The physical characteristics of the proposed building are such that the likely uses of the property will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required or that the use of significant portions of the building for storage or other non-parking demand-generating purposes or that the nature of the individual dwelling units and their location is likely to lead to dependency on non-automobile modes of transportation; b. Adequate parking is available on a shared basis as determined by all existing land uses within one thousand (1,000) feet of the parcel proposed for development, or parking is available through any aU existing or planned and committed parking facilities and or the shared parking formula in Article 3, Division 14; 4. The design of all buildings complies with the Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. C. Comprehensive infill redevelopment projects. 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise economically impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards; 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties; . 3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater; 4. The uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses; 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater; 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as an comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; 7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole; . 11 e e 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole; . 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; 10. The design of all buildings complies with the Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. D. Educational facilities. 1. The parcel proposed for development fronts on a road with at least four lanes. 2. The proposed development does not have an accessway which connects to a local street at a point more than 100 feet from the four lane road on which the parcel proposed for development fronts. 3. Height: The increased height results in an improved site plan and/or improved design and appearance. E. Governmental uses. 1. Height: . a. The parcel proposed for development is located to the west of Myrtle, south of Drew and north of Court; b. The increased height results in an improved site plan and/or improved design and appearance; 2. All street frontage is designed and used for commercial purposes or comparable governmental service purposes; 3. Off-street parking: a. The physical characteristics of a proposed building are such that the likely uses of the property will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required or that the use of significant portions of the building for storage or other non-parking demand-generating purposes or the physical context, including adjacent buildings and uses are such that there is a high probability that patrons will use modes of transportation other than the automobile to access the use; . 12 e e b. Adequate parking is available on a shared basis as determined by all existing land uses within 1,000 feet of the parcel proposed for development, or parking is available through any all existing or planned and committed parking facilities afl€l or the shared parking formula in Article 3, Division 14; . 4. The design of all buildings complies with the Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. F. Indoor recreation/entertainment facility. 1. Off-street parking: a. Adequate parking is available on a shared basis as determined by all existing land uses within 1.000 feet of the parcel proposed for development. or parking is available through any existing or planned and committed parking facilities or the shared parking formula in Article 3. Division 14: . b. The physical characteristics of a proposed building are such that the likely uses of the property will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required or the physical context. including adiacent buildings and uses are such that there is a high probability that patrons will use modes of transportation other than the automobile to access the use. 2. Height: a. The parcel proposed for development is located to the west of Myrtle. south of Drew and north of Court; b. The increased height results in an improved site plan and/or improved design and appearance. G. Limited Vehicle Sales/Displav 1. The use of the parcel proposed for development shall be located in an enclosed structure. 2. The use of the parcel proposed for development shall have no outdoor displays. 3. No vehicle service shall be provided on the parcel proposed for development. 4. Off-street parking: a. Adequate parking is available on a shared basis as determined by all existing land uses within 1. 000 feet of the parcel proposed for . 13 e e development. or parking is available through any existing or planned and committed parking facilities or the shared parking formula in Article 3. Division 14. . b. The physical characteristics of a proposed building are such that the likely uses of the property will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required or that the use of significant portions of the building will be used for storage or other non-parking demand-generating purposes. F H. Nightclubs. 1. Height: a. The parcel proposed for development is located to the west of Myrtle, south of Drew and north of Court; b. The increased height results in an improved site plan and/or improved design and appearance; 2. All street frontage is designed and used for commercial purposes; 3. Off-street parking: a. The physical characteristics of a proposed building are such that the likely uses of the property will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required or the physical context, including adjacent buildings and uses are such that there is a high probability that patrons will use modes of transportation other than the automobile to access the use; . b. Adequate parking is available on a shared basis as determined by all existing land uses within 1,000 feet of the parcel proposed for development, or parking is available through any all existing or planned and committed parking facilities flfld or the shared parking formula in Article 3, Division 14; 4. The design of all buildings complies with the Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. G I. Offices. 1. Height: a. The parcel proposed for development is located to the west of Myrtle, south of Drew and north of Court; . 14 e e . b. The increased height results in an improved site plan and/or improved design and appearance; 2. All street frontage is designed and used for commercial purposes; 3. Off-street parking: Adequate parking is available on a shared basis as determined by all existing land uses within 1,000 feet of the parcel proposed for development, or parking is available through any all existing or planned and committed parking facilities aOO or the shared parking formula in Article 3, Division 14; 4. The design of all buildings complies with the Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3; II 1. Overnight accommodations. 1. Height: a. The parcel proposed for development is located to the west of Myrtle, south of Drew and north of Court; b. The increased height results in an improved site plan and/or improved design and appearance; 2. All street frontage is designed and used for commercial purposes; . 3. Off-street parking: Adequate parking is available on a shared basis as determined by all existing land uses within 1,000 feet of the parcel proposed for development, or parking is available through any al-l--existing or planned and committed parking facilities aOO or the shared parking formula in Article 3, Division 14; 4. The design of all buildings complies with the Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3; I K. Public facilities. 1. Height: a. The parcel proposed for development is located to the west of Myrtle, south of Drew and north of Court; b. The increased height results in an improved site plan and/or improved design and appearance; 2. All street frontage is designed and used for governmental customer service purposes or is designed and/or screened to contribute to an active urban street environment; . 15 e e 3. Off-street parking: . a. The physical characteristics of a proposed building are such that the likely uses of the property will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required or the physical context, including adjacent buildings and uses are such that there is a high probability that patrons will use modes of transportation other than the automobile to access the use; b. Adequate parking is available on a shared basis as determined by all existing land uses within 1,000 feet of the parcel proposed for development, or parking is available through any all existing or planned and committed parking facilities aOO or the shared parking formula in Article 3, Division 14; 4. The design of all buildings complies with the Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. J L. Restaurants. 1. Height: a. The parcel proposed for development is located to the west of Myrtle, south of Drew and north of Court; . b. The increased height results in an improved site plan and/or improved design and appearance; 2. All street frontage is designed and used for commercial purposes; 3. Off-street parking: a. The physical characteristics of a proposed building are such that the likely uses of the property will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required or the physical context, including adjacent buildings and uses are such that there is a high probability that patrons will use modes of transportation other than the automobile to access the use; b. Adequate parking is available on a shared basis as determined by all existing land uses within 1,000 feet of the parcel proposed for development, or parking is available through any all existing or planned and committed parking facilities aOO or the shared parking formula in Article 3, Division 14; 4. The design of all buildings complies with the Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. . 16 e e . K: M. Retail sales and services. 1. Height: a. The parcel proposed for development is located to the west of Myrtle, south of Drew and north of Court; b. The increased height results in an improved site plan and/or improved design and appearance; 2. Off-street parking: a. The physical characteristics of a proposed building are such that the likely uses of the property will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required or the physical context, including adjacent buildings and uses are such that there is a high probability that patrons will use modes of transportation other than the automobile to access the use; b. Adequate parking is available on a shared basis as determined by all existing land uses within one thousand (1,000) feet of the parcel proposed for development, or parking is available through any all existing or planned and committed parking facilities aOO or the shared parking formula in Article 3, Division 14; . 3. The design of all buildings complies with the Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. b N. Telecommunication towers. 1. No telecommunication tower is located on Clearwater Beach. 2. If the telecommunication tower is located within a scenic corridor designated by the City of Clearwater or a scenic noncommercial corridor designated by the Pinellas Planning Council, the applicant must demonstrate compliance with the design criteria in those designations. 3. The design and construction of the telecommunication tower complies with the standards in Article 3 Division 21. . 17 I. . . e e CDB Meeting Date: October 17. 2000 Case Number: FL 00-08-34 Agenda Item: D5 CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION STAFF REPORT BACKGROUND INFORMATION: OWNERS: LOCATION: REQUEST: PLANS REVIEWED: SITE INFORMATION: PROPERTY SIZE: DIMENSIONS OF SITE: PROPERTY USE: Current uses: Proposed use: ZONING DISTRICT: PLAN CATEGORY: Trust for Rehabilitation and Nurturing Youth and Families, Inc. 100 North Greenwood Avenue Flexible Development approval to permit a public transportation facility within the D, Downtown District and increase the height of a public transportation facility from 10 feet to 36 feet, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment. The Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan designates this site as Low Density Residential and MediumlHigh Density Residential Categories. Site plan submitted by Florida Design Consultants, Inc. 3.48 acres 594 feet deep by 255 feet wide Vacant Public Transportation Facility D, Downtown District CBD, Central Business District Classification as part of the Land Use Plan element of the Comprehensive Plan and Low Density Residential and MediumlHigh Density Residential Categories within the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan. Page 1 e e . ADJACENT LAND USES: North: Office and single-family residential South: Office, retail and multi-family residential East: Office, retail and residential W est: Vacant lot and residential development under construction CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY: The immediate vicinity is a mixture of residential, office and retail uses. ANALYSIS: The 3.48-acre vacant site is rectangular with frontage on four streets. The site has 255 feet of frontage on both Booth Avenue (west) and North Greenwood Avenue (east), and 594 feet of frontage on both Grove Street (north) and Laura Street (south). The applicant is proposing to relocate the existing Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority (PST A) bus station from its current downtown location at the northwest corner of Pierce Street and South Garden Avenue to this site. The proposed location is located within the Downtown (D) District and is designated as Low Density Residential and MediumlHigh Density Residential categories in the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan. The Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan does not permit public transportation facilities at this site (refer to companion application CRA 00-09-01). . The proposal includes the development of a 7,200 square foot, 36-foot high bus terminal. The terminal will be shared among PST A, Greyhound Lines and various taxi/limousine services. The building will be located in the center of the site with circulation around the perimeter of the site. Stormwater retention facilities will be located at the northwest corner of the site. Access to the lot will be provided via ingress/egress points on Grove Street (automobiles only), North Greenwood Avenue and Booth Avenue (both for buses only). There will two curb cuts on Booth Avenue. The north curb cut will be limited to egress-only and the south curb cut will provide for ingress-only turning movements. The circulation, as indicated on the site plan, shows awkward turning movements with several vehicle conflict points. From Greenwood Avenue, buses would enter the site and turn left. From Booth Avenue, buses will enter the site and turn left to circle around the building, potentially crossing the path of exiting buses. A taxi stand is proposed on the south side of Grove Street. The building utilizes a contemporary architectural style with blue, standing-seam metal roofing, exposed, yellow, metal beams, glass block clerestory and either glazed block or metal panel walls. Metal decking with a combination of glass and masonry block columns will be used for the waiting areas and outdoor shelters. . The proposed bus terminal will operate similarly to the existing Pierce Street/Garden Avenue station. The facility operates from 5:20 a.m. to 10:20 p.m., Monday through Saturday. Sunday hours are between 7:00 a.m. and 9: 15 p.m. The Greyhound service will operate less frequently. Page 2 .. . . e e f;. fir Buses are expected to arrive at the terminal during a five to 10 minute window and then depart shortly thereafter. During peak travel times, activity will be most intense every half-hour; activity will be intensive hourly during other times. There will be no more than four employees working at anyone time. This includes three bus station employees and an additional security guard during the hours of darkness. This request is for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. The proposal includes a request to permit a public transportation facility within the Downtown District and increase the height of the terminal building from 10 feet to 36 feet. Unfortunately, the current PSTA location at Pierce Street and Garden Avenue experiences significant crime and security problems. Police Department records for calls for service for that site (for 1997 to 1999) reflect an average of 292 calls for service per year. To date this year, there have been 248 calls for service through September for an average of 27 calls per month. These calls reflect the following types of incidents: 9-1-1, drunkenness, theft, battery, domestic violence, trespassing, fighting, etc. It is clear that this is an historic and regular problem and the relocation of the facility would negatively impact the proposed location and neighborhood. CODE ENFORCEMENT ANALYSIS: Code enforcement violations related to this site include cars parking on the grass. A. COMPLIANCE WITH MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL STANDARD IN THE D, DOWNTOWN DISTRICT: STANDARD REQUIRED/ PERMITTED FLOOR AREA 2.0 RA TIO EXISTING PROPOSED IN COMPLIANCE? 0.05 Yes Vacant B. FLEXffiILITY STANDARDS FOR COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT IN THE D, DOWNTOWN DISTRICT: STANDARD REQUIRED/ EXISTING PROPOSED IN PERMITTED COMPLIANCE? LOT AREA N/A 151,467 square 151,467 squa re Yes minimum feet feet LOT WIDTH N/A 255 feet 255 feet Yes minimum HEIGHT N/A Vacant 36 feet Yes . maximum Page 3 . . . e e STANDARD REQUIRED/ EXISTING PROPOSED IN PERMITTED COMPLIANCE? FRONT YARD N/A Vacant Laura Street- Yes SETBACK 13 feet minimum Grove Street - o feet Booth Avenue - 183 feet Greenwood Avenue - 17 feet SIDE YARD N/A N/A N/A Yes SETBACK minimum REAR YARD N/A N/A N/A Yes SETBACK minimum PARKING Determined by N/A 11 spaces Yes SPACES the Community minimum Development Coordinator based on specific use and/or ITE Manual standards C. FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS IN THE D, DOWNTOWN DISTRICT: 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards; The intended land use for this site, as identified in the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, is Low and MediumlHigh Density Residential. Because the site is very large, few if any deviations from Code would be needed for these residential uses. New residential construction is underway on the parcel to the west of this site. The requested use and height deviation is inappropriate for the residential neighborhood. Page 4 , . . . e e 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties; As previously indicated, the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan indicates residential use for this site and for all surrounding blocks to the north, west, south and east. The design, use and operational hours of the proposed transportation facility are inconsistent with the existing and intended residential neighborhood. The existing bus terminal at Pierce Street and Garden Avenue has a history of police calls for service including 9-1-1, drunkenness, battery, theft, domestic violence, etc. The proposal will likely negatively impact the daily life of abutting residents and negatively affect property values. 3. The uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater; The proposed use is permitted within the City of Clearwater. 4. The uses or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are compatible with adjacent land uses; Adjacent uses are a mix of existing residential, commercial and office uses. Townhomes are under construction to the west of Booth Avenue. The area at large has been designated as Low and MediumlHigh Density Residential categories under the provisions of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan. The bus terminal is proposed on a site in the center of the residential area creating negative impacts on all surrounding residents. A major bus terminal is not compatible with existing or proposed residential uses, as evidenced by the crime statistics for the existing downtown bus terminal, increased levels of noise and pollution and extensive hours of operation. 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater; Alternative sites are available in the City for a public transportation facility. Operational options exist that may preclude the need for a facility within the City. 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive InfilI Redevelopment Project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; Although this application represents a significant financial investment for this site, the design, use and operational aspects of a public transportation facility will negatively impact the surrounding area. The proposed use is contrary to the recommendations within the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan and will negatively impact the redevelopment of the neighborhood. The police statistics for the current bus terminal show a history of criminal Page 5 . . . e e activity related to the use. 7. The design of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole; The proposed project includes a contemporary facility that is inconsistent with the residential neighborhood. The operational characteristics are functionally incompatible with residential use due to the long business hours, noise and air pollution from buses. 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole; The increase in height associated with the proposed use is not justified with this application. The community will not benefit from the redevelopment of this property as proposed. The use is in conflict with the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan and may discourage the appropriate redevelopment of the neighborhood. 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. Not applicable. D. GENERAL APPLICABILITY: Conditions which are imposed by the Community Development Coordinator and the Community Development Board pursuant to a Level One or a Level Two Approval shall ensure that: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density, and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. A mix of residential, commercial and office buildings characterize the area. The proposal includes a 36-foot, single-story, masonry building. The proposal is inconsistent with the existing and proposed character of the adjacent properties, and the recommended land use of the area. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The proposed development will have a negative impact in the area. The site and immediate area are designated as Low and MediumlHigh Density Residential categories in the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan. As described previously, the history of the existing downtown bus terminal shows significant criminal activity for this use. The Page 6 j . . . - e proposed development will hinder and discourage the appropriate development of residential uses on adjacent land. It may also significantly impair the value of nearby properties. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The proposed public transportation facility will have an adverse impact on the existing noise level and pollution in the neighborhood. The secondary impacts (significant crime, loitering, vagrants, etc.) will also affect the area. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. The City's Traffic Engineer has found that the proposed development will have no significant impact on traffic capacity. Street widths are inadequate to accommodate buses and the corner radii at all adjacent intersections need to be improved solely to accommodate bus traffic. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. Surrounding uses are generally residential and office in nature. The proposed development is inconsistent with the standards of the community character and the recommendations of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. Adverse effects generated by the proposed public transportation facility will include additional noise (from buses, taxis, and patrons), traffic and air pollution. The hours of operation are extensive, from very early morning to late evening, seven days a week. Secondary impacts of crime will also impact the area. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The application and supporting materials were reviewed by the Development Review Committee on September 7, 2000. The proposal does not comply with the standards and criteria for Flexible Development approval, or with all applicable standards for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. The plan is inconsistent with the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, will discourage the appropriate development of the surrounding area and will not enhance the local area or the City as a whole. Planning Staff recommends DENIAL of the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project application to permit a public transportation facility within the D, Downtown District and increase the height of a public transportation facility from 10 feet to 36 feet, for the site located at 100 North Greenwood Avenue. Page 7 . . . e Prepared by: Lisa L. Fierce, Development Review Manager: ATT ACHMENTS: Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity Location Map Future Land Use Map Zoning Atlas Map Application :e I' . i' //') j',.-: '0 ....-( i__ ~ (' e I j.. i . I I 'o- j '. ~< , ' S:\Planning Department\C D BIFLEXlPending Applications\Greenwood N J 00 PSTA\Greenwood N J 00 STAFF REPORT. doc Page 8 ~ NORTH 1 "=200' THIS IS NOT A SURVEY · Aerial Map. Trost for Rehabilitation and Nurturing Youth and Families., Inc.~ a Honda not for profit corporation 100 N Greenwood Ave FL 00-08-34 and eRA 00-09-01 ~"'~ ~-S ~ CITY OF CLEARWATER. FIDRIDA PUBIJC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING ~"~ tmh c~~~ \g~: ~\ "... l~ 1 "\.~~ f"jl ~~..~.., ~,.-.".. ~ Co tIll-! t"-l~ I---i.-< n o ~~ t:t:lOO Z::o~ S:A:l::tj ZW> t:t:l :::0 t:t:l::x>~ :::00> Z~@ C')I---i:::O z- I---i W~ t-3~ ::::00 ::x>~ t-3t:i I---i> o Z ~ ., (;~ 5. (D cs. (D 0 CD 0 Jl ~ II) - ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ c > > ,... f;j ~ ~ lD a :f- III -< Z CJ i! ~ r ~ Yl c > 0 > 0 :x ;;l ~ ,... ~ ~ z ,... > .., c ~ 0 III CJ -< -i ii:: I 0 o :J :J 0 a. 5' c -. III ~ ~ ~ 0 a z ~ z p ~ P -t Z P o "TJ "-.) ~r I( 4~ f:l ~~1 10-' '11 f?&\ \ \11111111[gD i ~ ; ~ i I ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~ g _; ~ m m 2 ~ Q ~ 8 s ~ ~ ~ i i - z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ I ~ . j i ~ I m i ~ ~ i; I I I e Eez ~ ~~l _ #0..... .'. .~~ :,.:1 ,r,,, "_," ,,: ,'" ..,"!! (f ....) .~ ~ tr1 ~ c-' ...... . r-t 0; e II I !j' ----1 I' 7 i ,L._ ~ I L___~_r L . . 11II.0 -. - .._ uc= i ~I~. ~ a I--=--==:J .\',:1:_, ~IJ:. n ~ i ~ III ~ ~ \ A~ · DD b ill<=)c=J-- .__ 1iC= D- _._ C I Ii ~ _. C I Ie , - 11- Die I om A1O[. I e ~ AvtNJ[ ~~DO U~~II ! i II '[3;rJf'll i ... C)~ ! Uil u-n-' -. ..... ~ fz:1 1_ _ 16302.12 r.- 302 17300 ~Q Po-- 29 28 27 6 18210 19 ZOB 20 206 21 204 1193 119~r; 170 173 ",24 23 22 e e '" co Qj ~ 3-.6'B 118J-651 22/01 '\.22/02 rHJG] EY 4 3 I 10640 554 12 o 11 3-3 13 SARAH 8) ..., \f c( ~ C ~ P, ;:: ~ ~ ~ ! q; ~ ro > 1 c: 14 j ~ ! ~ ~ all I'" c LAURA McMULLEN SUB 8) 1-41 " q; ~T D.L 1 5 no' \.V' 13 12 u~ ... I", I OWNER: SITE: w 12 11 ~ 303 301 JONES "'~ '" ~ 07 ~ ~ g :g '" '" 10 ~ I~ 9 8 ~ "<: Q) 6 ~ ~ ~ ~~ O'JQ)O)O)O>~ 20~ 18 17 ... "'~ '" g g~ '" }:; 16 ~/ 13 15 14 40 205 ~~6t e1 2 e '" '" e '" 138 136 14 ~ 7"- ~ t j 5 I- o W ~- R: r-- o -.... ZeN "N o '" 7 10 '" q; 3 1191- 1221 1640 29 4 5 ~ <0 '" '" e oe '" "'''' g 1221-eJl 2 6 11 PARK I I " <:> '" ~ S.R. 590 1191 ~~ - ~ 1 J 281 '" ....' 5 g4 3 g 2 0)1 135 6 (:,\ 7 132 9 1;:1 8130 10 rn 124 13 12____ e ~. 5i rRI"IVI'" ~ ~ '" ~ z g22/05'" ~2104 ~ : J -1.6 < o r.:y4 lil7 5 28 26 6 ii 22/06 .... e '" . 1 20 ..., 1 ~ 7C~ 27;4 /3 ~ 206 ~gil ~ 207 12 11 < 16 14 3 12 11 Z04 Z 205 1 5 ~ 1172 208 ~ 1203 191- 1196- 1160- \::/ 1172 202 III ~ 81 270 738 "1:5- 206 9 10 Z 207 2 3 4 5~ ~ ~61- ~ 6 '" 200 ~ 'g '" 6 ~ ~ ~ 0; 60.5 ~ 8 C 0 S? (;;) it 7 "';; ;)0; 5 302 6 3 f,;\ '-J' 7 A eMU ~N e <> '" <> 0) O.R. 138-116 ~ ~~ ~; ~ 0>'2&2-109_ , '" '" '" 5 6[l] ~ .u 5 6 211 '" ~;;;"'~,\ .119 2 g :::: ..,:: ~..... 3 "0 '" 117, ., 1 :: 115. "", \ , , 7 ll: 107 ,r ,. <:> 705 L ~\ Z7 \);:~'V ~ 103 :0 ~\~\'~ 6J:.~ ~ ~ N.~. ~ \ ~ 2213 RI!! OR -noS _......n 20 21 ~ ~~.,'.w:;'" ~: ..".." "'z7A li. 34567 ,,0" . r' . 111"...,_ /::<\1'), ,Yo · ,'. 10" ~ <:> '" '~.Il 50 / 19 t\V1 ' --. 8 ~ E 303 5 301 . 6 93~ 294 11 12 13 14 9 8 I- OJ o ..... 6 5 4 N NCt\l "'t <<tl oC) c <:) 0) 0) 0) 0) 46 ;; '" 60 <:; '" 8 9 ~ Q; 60 lee _ J ,,-M) 118 106 1ST- 96 7 8 ~ ~~r-a - 1196 268 '" 2 0; 1 77 15(.;\3 1IJJ4 1" 109 5 707 T 105 2 r::\N \:;(~ 5 6 o on o '" '" e ~ '" c ~ <> '" ~ ~ :: 1 i= 15 ~ o 13 [:;'\L 017~3 m~ .... <> '" 7F\O STREET .... <> :: '" <> '? ~ 10 9 206 ~,~'- 204 200 7 8 3 '" ~ DREW o on 1234-1204 t") 12 -707 ~ 1 116 ZOB " C; '" 10 70 309 12 9 308 c.:> Z ~ 309 < ~ 305 ~ 0' ~ ~ \.: ~ ~12J8-1.1 t-.12J}-26' 0')1108-J3)~ s> g g 0 - '3' 2 ' (.;\ \..Y 7 S i\RAH ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ 9 '" ~ Ol '" <:> '? '" ~ ~ 100 :: 4 ~8 e E 9 2 o ... 307 305 303 301 301 STREET ~ l~ _,.l'lt> I-> 4 (f\PS '2 S>~ 3 3 .> <' 13 12 11 14 5 567 4 I-> O>--1e '" '" '" '" en '" 1 2 3. \. 5 6 1 At K ~ 2C 19 18 17 1 ~ =--; 5 H]-'iO & S-43 CLEVELAND ., '" '" 7 ~ .. ~ ;;, ST 8 2 [:;'\ 8 \,1:/ 10 .:j SUE ~ ~ "'t a:: '? ~ / Voc.RjW OR 4231-1400'/ STREET g 304 13 i:\ 8 \..'..1 14 7 300 ~ 0:: 216 ~ 219 217 15 6 <:> <:> '? ... '" '" '" ~ N CO o I ..., N !-~ 215 Trust for Rehabilitation and Families Inc. a Florida not 100 N. Greenwood Ave. 8 10 215 1 b 16 5 207 @ 1-41 ci d 2 3 TN' IS lOT A 'URVEY " <:> ~ ;:; In ,I '" 22/09\ ~ r-..... '" 4 c ~CC\l ~~~ ~ ~:::: ::::::: ~ 65 ~ ~ ~ o on ..., ..., o~g ~ STREET Ol' E~ .,'" ~~ ~ .,,,- ~ ~ :! , ,- " 16 1 ~ ~ ~ 3331" '39 J3 37 J6 35 34 3 ...... 29 28 '17 26 24 2J 22 Z'l 20 ~ 12 "'-r-. [./ N...~~.7.e~~~~"~~%~M~ '0 " '" ~ 125 " 123 42 ~ ~ '" ~g '" ~ '" ~ '" ~ '" ~ 5C "- STREET o on on " S.R. 60 :!:' o co 0'" co.... ~ 40 "ill,. D . 15 1 2 3. ,.~ 16A~~ 1~~~15 14.~ ...~\2 30 ~ -47 o ..... '" :? 4 5 - :;? r"\J .'. ~ P. 21/02 21 21/03 2 6 7 20 21/04 - 8 ,.Jo / ",. 30 ~ 9 21/06 FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT REQUEST "'t r, ..: . .. "r . 'it ~... .", "" ~ '". '" . :-" ~,~ .'4!,J I A. 7 p' Q. a ..... ~ ...... ..... . ( y~ FL 00-08-34 CASE CRA 00- 09- 01 SIZE (ACRES): 3.48 PIN: 115/29/15/153928/00210010 ATLAS 287A PAGE: e e /qo I (}JtJL. j 1110 './ ~ - ~ 0, gqtJ ~ ~ NORTH 1"=1320' THIS IS NOT A SURVEY Location Map Trust for Rehabilimtion and Nurturing Youth and Families, Inc., a Plonaa not for profit corporation 100 N. Greenwood A no FL 00-08-34 and eRA 00-09-01 PARK WOOD ST c=J c=:J i WOODBINE z ST i3 c=Jjc=J:c SPRINGDALE i? 51 c=J c=J OVERLEA Ai ~ iao (/;~" ~j ELDRID 51 t ," """ 'DO Q]~ < CJ OtOCKSONzO-O OzCi3DRD ...FDORESTDg '" JONES ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C ES~ o D DIrJ D ~~D D ~ ,. ~ <( ~ " f :;;0 D ~;D D D~DSb~GR ~~~n~D~n~DjU~ug;~~n~D~D ~ ~~~DHEN~ D LnJ ~Ld'-~~ u~ T zU~ ~ ~ ~ lAURA " lAURA iE ST NL G1 oi:)OS 5D~ 0 g; 0 ~ D D O~c=::J . - ~ ~ c=J D~O~D 0 D~D \ CLEVELAND I D~D ST 0 D D~D>-I7;=J~t:::,,' c:=J~ % ~ lob D'o'd 0 < , ~ B.U~ 'Ob,~' ",~ m=1 OST ~D ~ CJ 0 D "~ST U 0\0: rzK(f1~~"r\~ j :jEJ~ ~ 0 ~~ ;s FRANKliN S1 t; ~ g ~ ~ ,,~N"J U~u U~ iRANKLlo/T n I :;;1 0 D~ "" ~ ~v ~<( ~ FRANKliN ST COURT 5T 'J ~ ~ ~ ~ G6ULO ~ $T C/R <( DE lEON ~ D D COURT "Sr ~ !'i[ I r-----l ~ c=J ~ ."""1 \ 0 D ~ w ~ ~ L:]SANTA ROSA? SAN JUAN O BROWNELL ST r---, ~ c:==:=:J L---1 ROGERS ST D~D ;ROCERS ~ESTNUTI D oS1 II I COURT ST I ~ S1 EJ ~D 0 L--.J. c:::J~1 CJ ~ ROGERS ~~ ~Qh~U Q ~ '"' ~ 0 Q I 'co",:, I ;1 ~;[]~ ;c:::J~6 '" t CI 0 ~ J' ('..,on D I I <.) ~:r PINE ~8<( ~ 0 "D ~ z LA ~ r------l ~ i ~ DRUID <( RD ~ W DRUID <( ::> DRUID RD ~ c:J1 I DDD JASMINE WA'y JASMINE WA 'y 1l~1 I ODD DR vi II I D D~D LOTUS PATH C]?il DO JAS~INE ~ WA 'y ~CJ:[ ,. ~AGNOllA <( c=J~1 LOTUS '" DR o:~<(~~ ~ : i ~ ~ ~ t3 w is lOTUS PATH PATH ;JASMINE Jo ~.~~ tn MAGNOliA 5c=J~ j TV PAT 5 ",,,"",'.... i~~' CITY OF CLEARWATER FLORIDA .: () "I,.. "'""I.~ \i\- - }) PUBUC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ~~11A ,f .., ENGINEERING ........,..""",,' --- d . I:.s.- 4: ~ o . _~_~ 1 J___ _ j _ L L to.O. ~ ~j J----r-----l 1---------1 r----1 =~~=-~ I~_-_- ~~J I -~----r-l--~- ---. ~ I----~-- ~ i JI I I I "I-~-~l---~-I \~=--=-~j--I ~. _-"---_LL_J l enUS^ve,UBAj.lsuUIld 1,--'------- "------~-- _ ,____ __.J L_L_ ) __ :llIIS88UOr ,--- 8OU8AViilU8A~U8d I :--1 r------ n._, r1-1-T' I ; ,I i JLI_ iJ 11m! __________'(________1 1___ -- --1'1 -----1---- -i I----=-=~=~~= --------1 ~-------J 1- ------1 i-.------I 81i~ L~~~J=~I 8nUS^V 8U/^ -T-l----I--r--r------j i-----r----l--- -!------r- --- --I -L+J_li 1H1L, ~:-f---, II_L L ,;-];., ] ~:j________L _ .I \-=-~~_~=~_~~~=-) m ~ <( +ole: (/) 0 m'- 0) (/) .c:C:: ~m 00. zJj 8nU8^V 1""3 i 1--:---------" Q) (I) :::> ~ c:: CO -J CJ) .5: ........ .(1) ...... Uj 1____ I I I I I I e ---I I juJ I ! I J____ 8nU9^\f poOMUHJf) ru, ---_..~_._--~._--_. .~ i I f I ,~C~l==~ [' 1------ -- ---- --I I - ,--------j l__~~-] t:=--~===I l______________ L______J______ --j onU8AV 41009 - \------_m----l \ I [ 1--------1 l_____j----: __ __,,~_"_~x.,_:odtiOJ.l---' ! OJ j Ln. . ! I I ~ I ~ 'i '8. .Ii i ! ~ ~ 1- ~ >- == >- E~== "ffi CU .- E c: LL ~ CU ,2 _ Q) LL It Q) == "5 c: O)oEOCU~~ c: ~ :J IE Q) CI) CU Ci5F-~OO::.E> DOl milD J j OJ ~ Z~0 .e .. 2- Cl " ~ Ol .S: ~ ~ .!! Q. 1Ii ~ 18 .!C'l o -= ~ ~.! ~~ 00 0 ill ~ ~ ~ .l! ~ ,.--~ earwater City Commission Agenda Cover Memorandum .ksession Item #: Final Agenda Item # Meeting Date: Jan. 18,2001 SUBJECl/RECOMMENDA liON: DENY the request of the Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority to amend the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan from Low Density and Medium/High Residential Density Categories to Public/Government Category at 100 North Greenwood Avenue to allow the construction of a bus terminal. o and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. SUMMARY: Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority (PST A) has requested an amendment to the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan to allow the construction of a bus terminal. The proposed location is on a city block of approximately 3.4 acres bounded by Greenwood Avenue on the east, Booth Avenue on the west, Grove Avenue on the north and Laura Street on the south. PST A proposes this bus terminal to replace the existing terminal located at the northwest corner of Pierce Street and Garden Avenue. A bus terminal is defined as a public transportation facility which requires a Public/Government use category in the Redevelopment Plan. The Greenwood Avenue site is currently designated as Low and Medium/ High residential categories and, therefore, does not permit the development of a bus terminal. The Redevelopment Plan was adopted in 1995 and it established five districts of the redevelopment area, designated land use categories for all property within the redevelopment area, proposed catalyst projects to leverage private investment and prescribed five general goals for downtown redevelopment. The proposed bus terminal location is inconsistent with all of these major elements of the Redevelopment Plan (refer to the attached staff analysis). In summary, the Planning Department finds that the proposed amendment is inconsistent with the Redevelopment Plan for the following major reasons: · The proposed location is central to an existing and planned residential neighborhood and a bus terminal will intrude into this neighborhood with its traffic, noise, pollution and expected secondary impacts such as crime. · Should a bus terminal be located on the proposed site, the characteristics of the terminal will discourage new residential development and eliminate a major residential block from redevelopment. There is a townhouse project under construction within a block from the proposed site and the proposed Balk townhouse development around town pond is located two blocks to the south. Introducing a commercial use with negative operational characteristics is inconsistent with this residential area. Reviewed by: Originating Dept.. Legal Info Srvc N/A Planning Budget N/A Public Works N/A User Dept.: Purchasing N/A DCM/ACM Planning Risk Mgmt N/A Other N/A Attachments: Staff Report Costs Total N/A Funding Source: Current FY CI OP Other Submitted by: City Manager "'., Printed on recycled paper o None A ro riation Code: I ---- - ---- . . .. Agenda Cover Memorandum Summary Sheet LUlOO-03-02 Page 2 . The proposed location is not conveniently located for major employers and their customers and will likely result in a longer walk for passengers or additional transfers. In addition, the distant peripheral location does not promote the expanded use of transit for new customers nor does it encourage the linkages between downtown, the beach and other parts of the City. The ability to link downtown activities and downtown parking for transfer to the beach is eliminated through this distant location. . The Redevelopment Plan anticipates public investment to leverage private investment. While PST A does propose a new terminal and a co-location with Greyhound Bus Lines, the choice of location creates more disincentives than the positive circumstances of the new facility. The Community Development Board heard this request at their public hearing of October 17, 2000. There was substantial public testimony by residents and property owners in opposition to the proposed amendment. There were no speakers in favor of the proposal. Reasons for the opposition to the terminal included the potential decline in property values, a decline in the quality of life for residents, the noise and pollution and their effect on the children at a nearby school, the potential crime associated with the terminal in close proximity to residents and inconsistency of the proposed use with the Redevelopment Plan. The Community Development Board unanimously recommended denial of the proposed amendment. In a related action at the same meeting, the Community Development Board reviewed the flexible site plan for the terminal and denied the site plan application. The PSTA has requested an appeal of the site plan denial which will be heard by a hearing officer hired through the Department of Administrative Hearings. The Community Redevelopment Agency reviewed this amendment at their meeting of November 13, 2000 and continued the application until their meeting of January 16, 2001. The CRA's recommendation will be reported at the City Commission meeting. 2 CDB Meeting Date: Case Number: Agenda Item: . October 17, 2000 CRA 00-09-01 D6 . CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION STAFF REPORT BACKGROUND INFORMATION: OWNERS: Trust for Rehabilitation and Nurturing Youth and Families, Inc. LOCATION: 100 North Greenwood Avenue REQUEST: An amendment to the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan from Low Density Residential and MediumlHigh Density Residential Categories to Public/Goverrunent Category. PLANS REVIEWED: Site plan submitted by Florida Design Consultants, Inc. SITE INFORMATION: PROPERTY SIZE: 3.48 acres DIMENSIONS OF SITE: 594 feet deep by 255 feet wide PROPERTY USE: Current uses: Proposed use: Vacant Public Transportation Facility ZONING DISTRICT: D, Downtown District PLAN CATEGORY: CBD, Central Business District Category Page 1 . . ADJACENT LAND USES: North: Office and single-family residential South: Office, retail and multi-family residential East: Office, retail and residential West: Vacant lot and residential development under construction CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIA TE VICINITY: The immediate vicinity is a mixture of residential, office and retail uses. ANALYSIS: The purpose of this request is to amend the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan to allow the development of a bus terminal at 100 North Greenwood Avenue for the use of Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority (PST A). A bus terminal is defined as a public transportation facility by the Community Development Code. A public transportation facility requires the site to be designated with the Public/Governmental use category of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan. The site proposed as a bus terminal by PST A is currently designated as Low and MediumlHigh Residential land use categories by the Redevelopment Plan and, therefore, does not permit the development of a bus terminal. PST A proposes a bus terminal on Greenwood Avenue to replace the existing terminal located at the northwest comer of Pierce Street and South Garden Avenue. There is a companion case which requests site plan approval of a proposed Flexible Development application as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Case FL 00- 08-34). Accordingly, this staff report evaluates the amendment to the Redevelopment Plan and the site plan issues are evaluated fully in the companion Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project staff report. The Countywide Plan Rules establish a plan category of "Central Business District" which allows cities to designate the boundaries of their urban center, prepare a specific CBD plan and allow downtown development with mixed uses at densities and intensities greater than in other parts of the City. Since at least 1976 when the first downtown plan was created, the City of Clearwater has identified the downtown as an urban center and the City's principal activity center. Over the years, there have been many downtown plans created with the most recent plan adopted in 1995 entitled "Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan." This Redevelopment Plan is the plan currently in effect and the plan for which an amendment is sought by PST A. The Redevelopment Plan establishes five general goals for the redevelopment of downtown. Within each goal, the Plan also establishes objectives and policies as detailed in Section VI. The proposal is evaluated against each goal, as follows: Page 2 . . 1. People Goal: To redevelop downtown Clearwater into a successful "people place" that attracts, retains, and inspires those of all ages and incomes to use and enjoy the community town center. Analysis: The objectives and policies of this goal highlight the need to encourage new residents to downtown, to encourage employment downtown through convenient transportation and parking, and to become the link among downtown, the City at large and the beach. The proposed PST A bus terminal location is in the middle of an area with existing and planned residential homes and the terminal will intrude into this residential neighborhood by using three local residential streets. The secondary impacts related to the proposed use (e.g. crime, noise, pollution, etc.) will detract from the residential redevelopment potential of the site and surrounding area. This is evidenced, in particular, by police reports for the existing downtown bus terminal which include an average of 27 calls for service per month (this year) for criminal activity (9-1-1, drunkenness, theft, battery, domestic violence, trespassing, fighting, etc.). The proposed bus terminal is located a substantial distance from the major downtown employers, thereby increasing the travel distance for most bus passengers or requiring a transfer at the terminal. The proposed location is a substantial distance from the center of downtown and available parking garages which could facilitate linkages between the City at large and other destinations such as the beach. In summary, the proposed amendment will allow a bus terminal in a location that will negatively affect existing residential owners and discourage new residential development. Further, the amendment will allow a terminal in a location that is not convenient for its passengers and will create a disincentive for bus travel due to its substantial distance from major employers. The proposed amendment is inconsistent with the People Goal of the Redevelopment Plan. 2. Movement Goal: To redevelop downtown Clearwater with an efficient, high quality, multi-modal movement system with supportive and visually positive terminal and transition facilities for all modes. Analysis: The objectives and policies of this goal establish the need for expanding the role of transit in the downtown. Specifically, objective 2 and its related policy is stated as follows on page VI-3 of the Redevelopment Plan: "Expand the role of transit downtown by linking the regional and local serving system as a means of reducing total reliance on the automobile. Improve the urban design qualities of the PST A facility to more positively relate to downtown. " The proposed amendment to relocate the PST A facility to this site is not consistent with the goal of expanding the use of transit by new passengers. The proposed location is not central to downtown and will require a longer walk by passengers from their employment to the terminal or require a transfer at the facility. The proposed location is physically unconnected with the Page 3 . . balance of downtown and will not contribute to the positive synergistic benefits of a downtown activity center. Although the proposal introduces a linkage with the Greyhound Bus Service and would create a new transit facility, the choice of location creates relatively larger disincentives for the general downtown area when balanced against the positive circumstances of a new facility and transit partner. The proposed amendment is inconsistent with the Movement Goal of the Redevelopment Plan. 3. Activity Goal: To redevelop downtown Clearwater to provide a broad and diverse set of activity centers that accommodate, stimulate and reinforce residing, working, visiting and purchasing in a great waterfront town setting. Analysis: The objectives and policies of this goal establish the need for diverse activities encouraging a 24-hour downtown. With new residential development located immediately to the west of this property and new townhouses planned two blocks to the south around town pond, this site's location and size of approximately 3.4 acres make it a prime location for additional residential uses. This site is in the center of several potential residential parcels and could be a part of the northern residential anchor of the downtown. This amendment would eliminate a major potential site for residential development and replace it with a bus terminal. The proposed amendment would introduce a commercial use with negative impacts into the center of a residential redevelopment area thereby discouraging other residential development from locating on the adjacent parcels. In addition to losing the residential potential, the proposed amendment would introduce a commercial use with external impacts into the center of a residential area. The use, design, operational characteristics and secondary impacts of the bus terminal are inconsistent with the residential character of the area and inconsistent with the Activity Goal of the Redevelopment Plan. 4. Amenity Goal: To redevelop downtown Clearwater to create and enhance a small town center "quality of life" that attracts and sustains a diversity of visual and use elements for cultural, entertainment, recreation and environmental experiences. Analysis: The objectives and policies of this goal establish the need to create the town pond to function both as a stormwater retention facility and as a park and to specifically act as a catalyst for residential development in its vicinity. As described above, the proposed amendment would remove a prime development parcel from residential development at a location that is within walking distance of the town pond with its proposed passive park features. The proposed amendment is inconsistent with the Amenity Goal of the Redevelopment Plan. 5. Opportunity Goal: To redevelop downtown Clearwater to attract and continue a process of value creation action that invests time, dollars, resources and creativity to enhance the value, tax base, image and quality of life for Clearwater. Analysis: The objectives and policies of this goal establish the need for key development parcels through the private market system while also encouraging public investments in amenities for the downtown. As described above, the proposed amendment would remove from the market a key residential development parcel. In addition, the public investments Page 4 J . . proposed by PST A do not encourage an active vibrant downtown and do not add value to the downtown amenities. The secondary impacts related to this use (crime, loitering, etc.) will negatively impact the quality of life for residents and business owners. The proposed amendment is inconsistent with the Opportunity Goal of the Redevelopment Plan. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: An amendment to the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan is a significant issue and has impacts beyond the borders of the proposed amendment site. In particular, the location of a bus terminal can have a positive effect on a downtown given a location that is integrated with the downtown land uses, is close to its passengers, minimizes the off-site impacts and minimizes noise and air pollution. However, the proposed location is not related to the downtown land use pattern and does not provide the synergistic effects that a transit facility can provide for major downtown employers. In addition, the proposed location is internal to an existing and planned residential neighborhood and utilizes three residential streets for access. The proposed location removes from development potential a prime residential development parcel in close proximity to the town pond and its park amenity. When evaluated with the five goals of the Redevelopment Plan, the proposed amendment is inconsistent with all five goals of the Plan. The application and supporting materials were reviewed by the Development Review Committee on September 7,2000. Planning Staff recommends DENIAL of the request for an amendment to the Clearwater Redevelopment Plan from Low Density Residential and MediumlHigh Density Residential Categories to Public/Government Category, for the property located at 100 North Greenwood Avenue. Prepared by: Cyndi Hardin, Assistant Planning Director: {, l~~ 8- ~ cArr ATT ACfTh.1ENTS: Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity Location Map Future Land Use Map Zoning Atlas Map Application IIMS2\PDSIPlanning DeparlmenllC D B\FLEXlPending ApplicalionslGreenwood N lOO PSTAIGreenwood N lOO STAFF REPORT CRPA.doc Page 5 ~ NORTH 1"=200' THIS IS NOT A SURVIY . AerIal IVlap. ....., .;.: ,< ,"., if'! Cl'l'Y or CLEARWATER. rwRlDA PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING ~ NORTH 1"=1320' THIS IS NOT A SURVEY . Location Map. Trust for Rehabilitation Il11d Nurturing Youth and Families, Ine., a Florida not for profit corporation 100 N Greenwood Ave FL 00-08-34Il11d eRA 00-09-01 PARK WOOD ST I I c=Ji 1'l00001NE:z ST <'5 I Ije=]r SPR/NGDALE ~ ST I Ie=] OVERLEA A ~ J ~D~D~ fOREST c=J ROGERS ST (f ;[]~'rnl 'j: EDz ~ "0 ..i. ~ ~ LA ~ DRVID RD c=J~1 ~ JASt.lINE ~ WAY @[=:J~I '" t.lAGNOllA ~ CJ~I LOTUS VI DR ~ .. ~ASt.lrNE Jo ~.~~ t;j MAGNOliA 51 I~ :j LOTUS P" TH 5 PATH /~~E;S--"':. CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA "(>~~~ {g ", "- j} PUBUC WORKS ADMINISTRATION -~\.: ~' \;'~1S1 !< ,,/ ENGINEERING ....."""",,'1,1 5 6 11 12 13 14 . ~ ~ CI 12 9 z ~ 12,; ~ 9 13 f\ 8 ~ 13 8 "\ -..::: '-= 14 7 i!: 14 7 15 6 g '" ~ z -1 ." 16 SUIlVEY 5 5 , 2 3 4 1 2 3 lesi(~ntia.l 5 6 ~ STREET -< Z 13 12 11 ~ 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 ~ II) z ~ 1 ~ 8 9 10 Q. ~ O'fi~elRESi~" f~ 5 6 7 8 DREW 2 1 ~"'5 "liii:.' rV- --';;:::::4 5 o Jfic e /}}e ~idellt4t \,.:J ~ 7 OI~Q,8 9 10 5 STREET j I., I. LJ I >>,-"" ",,.272& 3t .)I 31 ~ 35 3.4 .J I ..I.. "I" 2'.rJ 22 21:0 r I' 6 .. .. '- 4.~~~q~~~""~M~"~H 'I .. , . S I~~' g~~ ~ I ( . 6 7 STREET \ ~ ~ .~\ ~ G~ :o~~~~~v 2,2." N.t:. '--> 22 21 _ 20 ,Co ;\ ~ % ~ ;~' ,"':":' 6 7 8 8 '~'O" /W' ~ r'f\' glUr ,..~ tS y~ (J"e .'- od. 1..r /< y<Vrqvl' Jl.l.i"~TREET 3 (;:;\ \.::y 9 10 11 ,..~n\& ___ W I ::> 12 1;1,4 22/05 2 ~ l~1 .Nl;;..d. ~W- : r;.;'\ _f ~rr IY 10; 1" ~9 J ll,Jt~/O.~~W 5 (JtJ dt1.S~ 6 6 .. 2 5 4 10 8 9 LAURA STREET ~p 8) .... R 9 8 7 ~ (:\ 2 ~ '-- _ '-~3 Q. ,.... a:J ,~~ :: I ~ ~ 4 ('oj u..],.,. ~a. ni~y ~ ~2 ~4 'lticiJ 1 m 'j 5 6 7 8 5 4 ~ (.0" "" ...-, CLEVELAND I I rciaJ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 ,3 4 5 6 7 8 ,:\ 10 :'\ r-- :/ 16 =--;5 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 2C 19 18 17 <" 13 12 11 14 o "" S.~. 60 I (Ofj'l. ~~ e" 1e 2 3 4 5 15 6 7 8 o "- N L--- 21/02 21/03 21/04 21/0 ..,----"- 16 '-- PARK 14 00 I , ST 1 ~?c1l, ~ <1 " I 22/09, r?\ L 12 9 21/06 21/0<; EXISTING SURROUNDING USES OWNER: Trust for Rehabilitation and Nurturing Youth and FL 00- 08- 34 Families. Inc. a Florida not for Drofit corDoration CASE eRA 00- 09- 01 100 N. Greenwood Ave. PROPERTY SIZE (ACRES): 3.48 SITE: ir. PIN: 15/29/15/53928/002/0010 I ATLAS 287A PAGE: 40 205 ~~~5- 01 2 o '" .. o '" <:> '" III 10 ~ . 9 8 "'! -.: <xl ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ 0) 0) C) 0) 0) 0, ~s ~~ (!> Z ~ ~ ILl 12 11 16 S02Y.. ~ 30S 302 -' 1 7 300 30/ <:> ~ ~ E 18210 28 19208 27 20 206 6 21 204 1193 1193 170 173 ",24 2.3 22 o ~ ~ '" co '" J--.' l1aJ-65t 12 -3 SARAH 8) LAURA o ~ <0 308 93~ 29' 11 12 13 14 12 9 309 2 303 5 301 . 6 <0 <:> ~ 8 304 13 .. '" ~ 303 301 JONES STREET 14 o ... 300 j; a::: o :z 7 ~~ l.l) to... 07 ~ ~ g:g ~ '" '" "- o ~ '" o ~ ~ 219 2/7 15 208 6 2/6 207 20 19 18 1 7 .3 12 11 10 9 206 16 14 205 15 215 16 5 207 .3 4 03 1 201 117:2'- 204 Q ti ti S? 0 c 191- 1196- 116 1172 81 270 738 11 5- 206 2 .3 4 55 6 2 3 4 ~',~'- 204 200 7 8 3 ~ ~ o toOC\l g ~;:~ ~~~ ~~~ .. ~ .. o '" ~ <:> ~ 0 co () '" <0 o <:> .. ~ ~ <:> 65 '" 1221-el' S.R. 590 STREET <:> V") DREW '" o V") T )4-124 ~t2JJ-215J ~'2oe-JJ1:::: C'l']12 -701 ~.3 ~2~~ 1 1/6 e!'2'62-709C\i '" '" 5 C"),23IJ-'.' <:> ~ o g g g )& 37 )6 35 ,)4 /38 /36 10 AH 9 ~ 8 .. S? ~ 2 7S .. <:> ~ 40 ., 13 ILl ::> :z ~ < 1 ~ I lO o ~ ~ .. ~ 14 .3 5 4 ~ ~ -t. j STREET :; 6 7 eMU LEN 1~ 0: 5 6 <:> '" 0) O.R. <:> ~ 9 ~8 <:> ., ~ <:> III <:> '" 5 ~ ~ a.. (I) o Q: a.. to- o '" 9 8 <Xl o ........ 6 N No" 00 "'''' <0 ., '" <:> o ~ " o ........ Z ~~ .., 5 4 .. OJ o <:> 0) 0) 46 ~ '" o CLEVELAND V") ,... 0'" lOr- STREET <:> lO S.R.60 :!:' o II) ~ 60 (; '" 30 ... o '" "- '" '" ~ '" ~ R/ D. 1 ~ ~ '" g 40 o ........ '" II) <:> I '" N '" ... 6 7 8 2 .3 6 7 8 10 ;;; III N I ~ 21/02 2/ 21/03 5 11 10 @ 1-41 ci d 20 2 9 13 12 11 /0 .. Cii :! .. <:> ~ 21/04 ... ;0 60 PARK 21/06 VJ "-", FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT REQUEST Trust for Rehabilitation and F amities Inc. a Florida not 100 N. Greenwood Ave. FL 00- 08- 34 CASE CRA 00-09-01 SIZE (ACRES): 3.48 PIN: 15/29/15/53928/002/0010 ATLAS 287A PAGE: ___ J . . ZIMMET, UNICE, SALZMAN & FELDMAN, P.A. Two Prestige Place 2650 McCormick Drive, Suite 100 Clearwater, FL 33759 ALAN S. ZIMMET T.R. UNICE, JR. ANDREW J. SALZMAN DONNA 1. FELDMAN Telephone: (727) 723-3772 Facsimile: (727) 723-1421 *** *** BRET T. JARDINE ROBERT E. HEYMAN NICOLE E. WEISS JOSEPH H. GRAVES ELITA D. COBBS Website: www.zusflaw.com September 25,2000 Mr. Mark T. Parry Planner City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 Re: Application for Flexible Development approval (FL 00-08-34) to increase the height of a Public Transportation Facility from 10 feet to 36 feet and to allow a Public Transportation Facility to be constructed in a location designated as Low Density Residential and Medium Density Residential in the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project with Comprehensive Landscape Program Dear Mark: Please accept this letter as a request on behalf of the Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority for the Trust for Rehabilitation and Nurturing Youth and Families, Inv., a Florida not for profit corporation, to amend the City of Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan for the above- referenced property from a designation of residential to a designation of publici government. It is my understanding from our conversations and the recent staff meeting that you have scheduled this matter for consideration by the Clearwater Community Development Board on October 17,2000 and will be later scheduled for a City Commission and Community Redevelopment Agency consideration. At the October 17,2000 meeting, the Clearwater CDB, acting as the planning agency will make a recommendation to the City Commission and CRA . 00004973.WPD j1c~ q1Z7/fJ FILE COpy C (LA (jl). Cfi-Ul ( ~v(L fU 00. 0 g- ~Lf) . . Mr. Parry September 25,2000 Page 2 If you need any additional information with regard to this application, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely yours, ZIMMET, UNICE, SALZMAN & FELDMAN, P.A. ASZ/jas cc: Ralph Stone ~- Roger C. Sweeney 00004973.WPD . . o >- e- u To: Bill Horne, Interim City Manager From: Ralph Stone, Planning Director Date: January 8, 2001 RE: Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority Request At the November 13 meeting, the Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) deferred action on the Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority (PST A) request to amend the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan in order to construct a new terminal. The CRA deferred action on the request in order for staffto identify potential alternative sites for a new PST A terminal. Planning Department staff identified four potential sites for a new terminal. Attached please find information and maps of those four sites. Staff also met with representatives of PST A and provided them the attached information. On December 14, 2000 a letter from the Executive Director of PST A was sent to the City stating that the sites identified do not meet PST A criteria. Attached also please find a copy of that letter. Staff will be prepared to discuss these alternatives with the City Commission at the January meeting. Attachments . . POTENTIAL PST A SITES 1. Existing PST A Site with County Parking Lot Land Area: 2.06mol Zoning: Downtown Downtown Redevelopment Plan Land Use: Public/Government Ownership: a. 16/29/15/32292/005/0070 - PST A b. 16/29/15/32292/005/0060 - Pinellas County - Water/Sewer c. 16/29/15/32292/005/0110 - Pine lias County - Water/Sewer d. 16/29/15/32292/005/0040 - Pinellas County - Water/Sewer e. 16/29/15/32292/005/0010 - Pinellas County - Water/Sewer 2. Site located on Cleveland St. between N. Evergreen Ave. and Hillcrest Ave. Land Area: 1.357 mol Zoning: Commercial Ownership: a. 1364 Cleveland St., 15/29/15/64890/001/0080 - Jamil Salhab b. 15/29/15/64890/001/0070 - Peter Gianfilippo c. 15/29/15/64890/001/0060 - Peter Gianfilippo d. 1370 Cleveland St., 15/29/15/64890/001/0050 - Peter Gianfilippo e. ION. Hillcrest, 15/29/14/64890/001/0010 - Peter Gianfilippo 3. Site located between Cleveland St. & Park St. & San Remo Ave. & Hillcrest Ave. Land Area: 1.817 mol Zoning: Commercial and Medium Density Residential Ownership: a. 1417 Cleveland St., 14/29115/47016/002/0010 - Helen C. Arfaras & Mary G. Fajardo Trustee b. 1390 Gul to Bay Blvd, 14/2915/47016/002/0190 - William J. and Mary A. Moran 1 . . c. 1410 Park St., 14/29/15/47016/002/0170 - Pecoraro Consult. Inc. d. 1416 Park St., 14/29/15/47016/002/016 - Pecoraro Consult. Inc. e. 1420 Park St., 14/29/15/47016/002/0150 - Jolly Rodger Invest Corp. 4. Site located on Gulf to Bay, Highland Ave. and De Leon St. Land Area: 2.055 mol Zoning: Commercial and Medium Density Residential Ownership: a. 1498 Gulf to Bay Blvd., 14/29/15/10476/007/0060 - Richard P. Levy b. 1488 Gulfto Bay Blvd., 14/29/15/10476/007/0090 - Ercole & Rosa Volpe c. 1472 Cleveland St., 14/29/15/10476/007/0150 - Sehm Vinca d. 1489 De Leon St., 14/29/15/10476/007/0010 - Merwyn and Merilyn Hassell Trustees e. 330 S. Highland Ave., 14/29/15/10476/007/0020 - Merwyn and Merilyn Hassell Trustees 2 ~ ... 286A ~ I Ii i I ~ I'" I (Jl I 1./ I . 1 ~ : ~ I )>,~ I I 1 I ~ J1 ~ I ~ fg~ I ~I ,-t-~---rr-1- to_~ ~ j I I I ffi I I ~ ~~ ~'~ ~ I I I I ~ I '; I ~ '" + ~ ~- I I i ~. I '8 0,; ,2llD ?~.. "-I ~ I I I I '6 Sl - plOld n tII ........~ I ~ N o l:"' 0 ~ 8 s ~ + N -I .. ~ 9 ~ N I ~~c;--a~" Of\\9 '/ 60 I v. v;, " __~ 0 ~ , f;~ ~~ ~ I~~ j ! ." ~ /7 e---- n I~ I t I~ ffi160~ ~ CD ~ ; ~ '" N~' N ~ g ~)-I {~ c '" -0-- ~ N I /1 ~-I;; ~ -:u @ => - 0 9 B ~ i '" e:.. ~ g OAl( AVENUE g ~ ~ ~ 7 0> -< I f-~ N ~ 4=j316 '" "0 N ~ ~ ~ f... _ a:: J t:l N"'J ~ g 8 0 . ~ .;: c ~ :: "~ -...J - ~ HJ8 113 Q I 13/05 g 60 ... rr--I~ -", 25, ~ _ ~ :; :; SOUlH :; ~ """"'" . ~ I 70 ~ c.~: ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ f I ~tN~- ~ N '" ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ * CD ~r-e-- '" - tJ !1~f-9i" _ ~ _ ~ i'ft ~ W4~ ~ - ~ I" om OJ> :;::-< -U"Tl r::U 1"'10 XZ t'Ci; N-I f---t:: ; ~ ~ ~ ,,~~r:....... z ~f J---~ k~~~ 1- ,~ . I-~ IT! HALL 801 ~- -"- B U;:;:G:~ ~f< '" ~ ~ ~ f\.)1- '" <.D (Jl rn .tiL --'----'- rf; ~ .cO -:7 I raN 1 tJ I B I I~ AVEN"< ID o ,(01 >~ .~~ ~ @j - '" o ~ .,.. ~~ ;;t 40 '" 4:" cr;~CDiO~~~~ --roD"" ;: I : :~_ 2778 651 L-- AlT U.s.19 c:: S.R.~ 0 SOUlH FORT ~ ~Ig ~ ~ ~ iffi:,;; ~ u J;; -, /1'.) p..J 0 (...j (..of -< ""':;~ Ctl to" ...... t-.J t..I i- :! ~ :! 8 D S. CAIlDEN ....I~ ~ R~F~of ii"', _"I~ 'I~II 0: ~ 0 ~~ +1"/04 6'16 [!Y ~n I ~.. ~ t I~ ~ I~ 6 . ~ ,< ~: g <JI '" ::Ill ~ ~ ",Z ~ '" ~ w ~ul~ul~t;; u: I ~ -..J I ~--' '" ~- ~ ~ ~ C1t '" ~ c z ~ '-J~~ S7IO--12tl1 :!: o_;~, ~~ 6~ '" '" I "" ~AVEN~UE ~ "'" ...... ~ cO CEI ....., ~o m't i?~J~~""~ - &,. ~ . H/OJ fgco ~ ~~ ""',.... M I ^r~ 60' LJi ~ (-..JltD N t: _ CD of' 0 0; ~02 ~RE A nON=- ;;I,.<)({ N45~ 613.~ 6:J(.I ~-,;;- ~ >=;;. -('...} ~ .::1 ~ 1 PO ICE ,,&f' ~ I ~IO~ 5V"-l 1 i~P-~I~- :: ! i';;Jf" ~l ~OJ .. ..O(~,; 'J 50! '" "'...... :~~ ~ ~ s.x. RR Ora 116 ... ;; 6~ 14/01 ~ ~ ...! ~~..... ul.f>- ~ '" ",C1l ... 8 en 0; ~ U; I ~ I ~ ~ u~~ ;;l'-,w - ~C1l ~ I'T1 ~u.... C.D ~ ~ 6.50 c: I en ~~1 _~4~ ;::; -- ---! "d!:' ~ .4() ~'~ __ <i.z-~- -",-':j- ~~ lS4lS 0 (l) 6S7 "-I no (D C.....1 .,., - n. - - ~ '"~: .,.. V2J4$$ &>6 U< ... I---- ~ Q) + 65' f-:----c - ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ .... QQ - ..- - B 700 (; ~ 01 .j, <I~ '" '" (0:)0 N ~ i ~ ~ ?u o 700 - ~~",->703.il704 co u 13 N"* '"~ '" N ~ \-~.i'" '" - = 706 f-- -;;-- 1ro --....10/.... f-- 30 708 ~ c5~-S~- SC 1H ~[3 rl-I: -- ~ CI g 6(l "~ ~ (JI ~~ eo 7011 0 .~ 60 60 I/'lRTlE A~!lf d'" ~'06 I I ~: U< .J SDO.... c..", t'V --' 516 .,. 61. 0'1 Sf. ~6t6 -+- r- t6.17 ~ <!>~ ,,- 6.u~ :':.,'Q .~U . - A'-C>'~ ~~ c 11/05 81" CD -...j SItS '" ~~ OU "'0-'17 -... ~.., .... W &.J6 H ~k-~5-~ ~~ 640 i: 6,U ;. 11 0 N.... - i~ ,... , 700 '" U< 'fOf ~ 13 ~~o~ ~"" I CD ~ ~~ ~ 716 01(,0 ~ 1'0 717 UJ J us - 7Ui '0 7-'17M ~ 80,/'00 fll]_o'~,r60~f;j::II,n.~I"1 'Df ~ N '"~ 60 :: : ~ T V L8l ~z "1"'1 ~ tj ~ ~ r, I i I I ".J . I~ ........ ..)./>. "0 (J'l IUl ", ~n n:::! N o z z (.") '= Z rTl N o Z rTl N o z z C) o rTl Vl Q :J :t> C) :u '" '" <:: rTl z -< O[/) C I -<:t> VlO 6'" ",0 n :t> ~~ Q :J ,- jE ~ Vl J> o o :u ~ o ~ '" o ~@ ,- I'l GJ I'l Z o ~o o o Ul "-' n -0 ~ 0 r- o --j Ul ,- o n '" z c '" 1/ "'~.. 7 t:j( ~r g +N f\" DREW "'''''- " 'r--- ~~ ~ · ~ ~ f?--r?----- ~tJ 151 ii" ~~ ~ j ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ I A-:t>>- ;;:I~ ~ CA z I~ Ie <J ~ I 0)> Q\ ~ ;;u ,r ';; 8t ^ o ~ 0 .. I I--T- ~f-_. ~;;;:::8 I 8 ~G ~ l'~'r~ - ! ~~c;i 1ft I ~ ~ ~ I I ~€ ~7 ia l:: -<Q ~ ::0 o ~ '1:1 o ~~ ~ ~~ II: ~~ tI1lD fn 0 @~ rn :E "" n :g ", co Z ~ --j ~ ~ - 01 --J I ...... :;: .,., .31 --t-- ~ ~ "'",~ '. 'P .ll' ~~. NQR1"H " <OOp~r Ir .20" A"" it ... ~ c '" ,. .. --- ~ ~ JIll Q) 61--~1- N ri1*- S "'~<J1 ~ ~:; ~ g '::il::zJ ~~ .,;~ L!JN '6 ... 4'101\'''''~ ~ 0... 2-12 "~2_~ "'8 2-128 :~ ~~ 426 ~ <ZII D # 1]/10 <i;; I "l/~= <O~ o~m =vim 'J1t~1 N -.... o '" ~ NORTH FORT HNlIUSON ~ r;r~J~m:EmlJOO~0...1~ 00 ~ WA T1ERSON .. \9IlIE ;;;... 1 ~ l::1 616% t ~ ;i" d'Ul €> ~ ~ ~ ~q~u <It a .e 63<1 '" N ;4-" ~ <JI 6114 (JI O'l '-J &: - r ~ Ql ,n _ N tSE ~ NORTH GARDOt x: AIID<<JE ~ -~ Cl..EJ: -7l:48 <; hJ I~ (5) ~::JolrE:R-7lr~TeR ,i' ~1-1<J1I"'Tu ' ~ =i1~~ -1.04--82 ~' "5 m~.8i~~ 1 ~o w "" Z CD 0 --.J ...~ ____- 62:0 ti) O'J -_ --; V t~ '" '.m ; f..:\ l\) Ii:: Z o _ IIJ ~...... 0 ~ - 1::'- "'0 _ -;;J .:tl SZ8 ~ .".!; ~ c..n J:I ~ ~~~;I, (Xl ~ ~ _L: l' N .. ~ @...~? = ;: -' 50 g 0; \...12: ~ ::.;.- 61 700 704 ,:::; ~ ~ 6~L: a "-J:; ~ n6 ~ 7U co lM :::I t-."...j~ 7HJ~~ ~ -i ~ c; '" j co 0 ~~ ill ~ NS ~ ~ S I~:@- "'- ON -N ~p..,)f'>.) A~ o c;"la; 7""1 NORlH _ _ If'(!!.~ so, 50 ~ -.... 'i: 1~ r BO 1 I ~...,.II80I." I ~ 0} .- O"l:lC035"~O"l) "'~~g~a~~~ ~.';:;;- ~~ : ~ ~':; 0" ~a;;~::1~a.:t~ :~':o:~~O"~ :- ~ ~~ ~ ~. n ~ ~ 1HWHj , ~ ~ /~ -0 o ~ . ~ ii" ~ ~ (}l c 60 ~ ~ z:~ g ~~ ~ ~ ~ < t--------::.jlo. ~...............~CD ~ t-----;- '" '" - 0 1St' il ~ u 1259 · -.J).. f~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1.250 c:= ~ (]1 ~~ ~ 26., CD .tJ~ ~ :ZJ --;- N ~~ ~ ~ I~' 0; -4 ~ ......1267 12114 ..... "'C6> ~ tn ~ f11IIIII' ~ tt~ -I: a l::: ~ ~ t;:~ ~ ~ :. ~~~ ,,~;> ~ ~ CIl 1250;:c;.~'J ::: ~ t= I~m., ~o; ~rj~~.p.gS..~~~ ~ ~ ~. ,.... ~I ; T JJZ' _ '" "- ':1A7 ~ -- '~ fOr h~;:; W 1276 _ ......J (,.I 1m .......... t-..) N a'I -1 /f '_28! It ~ t ~J ~ ~ ~ ns ~ ..... -f'o (Jl -:~ ;,'':/ ~ li3""f~ i;j u:::. "-> IDS _ EN p...J (...j .....~~. I1ziz _ ~ ~ qQ'6. $ 10 0 ~ N .. I'V..... I'V ~ ,e> .t'Y'TJ c; g ~ :': ~ ~ co. WI (4 IZBI I\.) loa ~ 'b r~ l.AfI,IE 0 ":"~ i,~ ~/'.' : '.~: " ~'~. ~~~'I" :: l'~ ~&S.; 'I; w '" _ T\,-,\ Ili\ ~ ~ 'y - ~ ~ '::j .f: / ~ 8~~~' "'\ \~ W, ... WAY g 50 70 t---- ,b,-.S;;:j .... ~ I; "s' ~ "I~+:, , I~~ ~~~~ t.,. '''is :~y ~ ~~!i ~ U~~~iJ"' ; I " k - T ll" Il '" ~ FREDRlCA I ~ 0 ~ ,-......::: l;:i s:: ~ ~~~I~ :~;-::r305~gS _ - -, - 0 co OJ \ ~1JI01' ~ Cl~ 11> 0 o~... ~ ~;::; U _ -.;:~I ~~-;;;. ~ ~'" u; a; u; -..: ~ s::: ~ "":':"-::'1=- ~ "" N _ ~ 1~rJ) ~ ~c :: ~ ~~mu , '{..} ~__~ .u.'" , g ~~.. g g s. ~y NARY DRIVE g ~ i > · 'I f~~'~~~p~ '1~ ~:~~ :,i ! - I 70 1!t6IJ h .. 0 1 . r l:Il:l.,..... . 388 ;;;" Il~73 ~ - .... '''' :c;-- ~ ~26 ~ 271 ~ ~ ~ ~ '.::...lM!.. f2BO - N <.0 m CD ~ '-- '""" g { o ! t f-- ~ f-- 50 50 N <.0,- ---.J :t>_ . ~2 (J1fT1 ''':::: ">~ COo " [J) I[J) fT1 ~O :J1=' o "2 ~... . ~ tSf-f: ~ ....... "._ ~~,..s \..1 - 0 " _ ;::; i5 C)<o. .. .'36 ;::;... t ~; '-"IT-n. IS5D = ~ ~ ;J( f~~-J .. 1,858; N_ . -",.. ~ ; ~~ - ~ gllllll 1ffi1- -= .::;;: .. 138555 - - " ~ lOU== ~S '-- CD CIl/_",~ i---=" N ,liT __._ ~ ~ --4- ll.... ~ r-" ~ f~- r=t ~;,I- ~-b I~: kMV .;t'-".,,~ ;;; ::r---i- 1Z1i, ~ .... ':f:= --<> ., $ ~ >F--. '" '" tA ~ ~zin j' ~ ~ N I ~"'" g9 '" ~ 50 ~ _ ~ ",-011 i! i! ~- ~ -~T lZ:J7....,... I a, ... g ,.J +rR=rl-/ fb ~ _ 1IOIlII,:1/U.~ ,<,,' ~ ~OOi"''''~ ~- II!~~~ ~. .~\ \ ~~ II;;' ~ ~ O~ _~r: "j of+. O~ ,0 I"... 'f-~ :\> ~~\~ ~ ~ f--_"'-! :>; ~ ,~ N ro-~ .J ~ :e,A ~:~~:-~ ~, ....~ .Ao. OJ ..f>- 0> W W ~ ~'" --- ~ " - '" Q tf': wIDe; ~I------_ ~ 7<l o~ ~~~~ ~~ ~ -6..-1 -' , ~ I_;!:~:' ~,~ ! ;oj s UNCOlN .. VJoJ:. ~_ Bl-l1& ~ !': ~o;~ m WiS ;1 ~ : ~~ w '" )> a; l\ ~ r 50 "'S'" _ i "'_ ;1( ~ 50 ,.94'... 0 "'" Or.... ~<;)~ ~ tS.u : I~./ ~ \:~~\::I ~2~ '~1 "'~ "'.-\l~ 1so2 .;~~. ; ,1s, G:i. -~ ~':"'S59 G _ S6. ~""J...",,.~ rS6~ z ~ - t_ 356.... ~ "'~ ~ ~ ~ ::!k ~ ~ -[ ~ t36 50 ~,~1~...... g ~ g {1l .,"--IIw:.S.....~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (J' ~ ~ ~.J>,. ~ ~'38 ...... ~JIII!I 40 ~ CJ) ~ '1'~8 L-i ~~~ 10 14>-I~g;U~ ~ ~(;;\ 18'14 ;:::; r"'\. ~-^ <...l 137' a ~ ~ '" _\::;,I ~r-- "'~ ~ 1973 1380 ~ (I:J -....J N ,~ 50 1380 '" 1379 -----'= It..... _ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ E ~ ~ ~ ~ i! ~ ~ ~ ~ t3~""" -' 1883 50- - - AVE. "7";.: _ 6Q L._. <oj ~ II ~~~ ~.2~ v ~N/'...l"""U..I I'.J ... J!!'! =- 0 - ; " q, U(Hl UI I I t,I-""Z ~ ~~ ~ /150 ~ Z -4 rr! ;u -u )>U1 ;u;-l o 00 :err! );~ 'r::: U1)> o :e o o , " ..... o u 50 Q Q :s <: HI nOD ~ t:~ ;! ... .~ ~ Ul ~~ 0; :;: I~' 6Q ~c;~ ~~~a;3 ~r ~::~} ~~ ~~~ I~Z ~ ~ '~t:J 6Q w '''04 ,""'''' '''DB "'0 uta -rfr~1fJr ........1408 en 11ft ....... 11(3 ~~ N 1408-:::' 14H~ ? V88Z N o z Z GJ )> -t I ~ o ~ .. r, I I I I L..J ~@ . N o Z 1'1 N o z z G) o 1'1 'l:! G) z > =:J o z o -f -< o < Z 1'1 o " ;;0 o -u 1'1 ;;0 --j > G) ;;0 rTJ rTJ s:: ['1 Z -f OCfJ CI -fpo CfJO 6rTJ ['10 0> ,::0 rTJl'I >> ;;0 o o ;;0 ['1 CfJ CfJ , Z 1'1 !::: z rTJ -f o po z z ['1 x l:1Ot '" ,2C!i ... (' ~ () ~ A5t ~\ 0,--, <6-,; "1' 00 ~ IA -1' 10 ~~~ ... ,2QP /" ....... '2,. '216 ~::: ft}W '-f)v'221J "':} IU& 1229 A 'l:S1~tA f)~'" '" t133 '" 123 DB ll.e?-SJIi!l i5 A V9lUE 4 ~ ~~ -. ~ ~ ----"- -=7- --"- .Jim ~f;m ~~- f---+. ~ ==i =i::::= ::i::::m ~ ~ OIOI~ ~ AVE. ~ - -;..- - -"--- ~ -=--- ;;; -;-.- ---- -=-- '" iI f:: ... . . . ...~ . " ... "d>""tJ> ........~0I'l1' ~~ ~~ ~ ~,::: eo --'~ 0 I~ to N ucr; '4,Q ()) ..os "" CD , o n ^ z c s:: CD ['1 ::0 ,- I'l C) I'l Z o Ul o > r ~ ... a q , UNCOlN I ~~7 ,;ZS& 0 c ~ I ~ i1 c; "l ~Hl!;~t 1O~ rY1 :: t:'1 tv c.o ~ ~ l.ua~/~ ~~ t.; --1fP I'; I<EN~ _ 00 r/'iu~ ~ ~ :tL~ ~' ~ ,... 1 '.<s> II~ ; c;~ ~ mdl .. ~ 50 ~ Jt~~ '27!J ~ (fI rv g ~.3.378-10B ~ R f--r - - A llES 11 n<- - .. ,~ .E,:V~ 1/ r~~& ~ i I 'ri ~.- ~A. or-- -!;!-c P ,E1 S - I"'i!; :t: !:i - ~ A S "1:1:'"'. o Q ~ ~5; (..J N _ UN; 0 W "'$j~ ~ 0 ~N ~ tv t--,) ~ t-----t- <0 ...... (yI....., CD '...., : ~ I : 100 ,w. t21J. IbOa tZ1Z '" .s g .JEfFtRSON t31< 11.0 '218-1/8 '" ~ ~o :ili Cl IIi;; F.i ,22tI ~ ::L!f o "" t/I ~~ ..J. .....--- _ I2!JO 191 1\1 '23' 't" I nn- - I :g 1238'" N -I ~ U I - - '242 Ii ;: N 123"; 100 ~ o go . I; J f2S0 m o ~ z c 1>6' ~- ~"' t_~ -' ~~ ~~ 1374 ~ ~ ....0; 0-\ U1 l00~-..: i g N ~" I,..., ~ ~~~c:=;; '---+- " ~ Ii = . f,.)_ 1.!1J6 II 1102 HtO o a a N o a Eez ... a a ~~ ~:.o ~"'i ~ =-:-- ~- ~ W 1t1fU ~Q<> ~ ..~ R I 51: -- m- ...w ...~ ~ 1215 11Z14 ~ ~ "'~ _ 8r9 I::t1B 0 "Iffl ~ ~ ~ * f2:l:J~: ,22:. r,22lW ~~ 7m ~ ~ t:l ,;:, Iii ~ ~ " m 1~ US" ~ .Mi g ~ : D; I ~ 0: '1:l U fi ~ :.. ~ ~ N FREDRlCA 'I !: ~~ ~ o .. --::j~_l: t-.) N t..,) N N ....... m~.:t:.L4EtO mtnN l!: <l - LAOY WARY B I- 34 oe/ ~: -- "' ..... 2 r Al RV E TAI~. . ~ c; ;:; ::: 0 CD OJ -..."... $ ~ ;: ~ ~ !!:: ~ = ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~~ , ~ !t 5 - 8f ~~ ~ U o <.0 en E ""i:AJ 37 56 '" ... U ~ '~~n~ ~~~ ~~~ 1oI'1.Uif" <:T '" ' o .......'406 G ~!:= ~::~ ~ ~ i ... a; HOl 14" " g ~~~g~~~~~ ~~~3i~!~~ C :::T(') 2 a. () ::::e ~~~~6Z~;~ ~3!3~3~:: ~: [~~r ~~~ a.~~~ffi";~~~ ~~~~~~ ~l~ ..z2~~~:.;~ }5:~~~~;~ o ",=:0.3-'[] <CI ;; 3';- ~ - ~ ~ &~Q_S:~ !:\ ~~ 3Su "5 ~ ~~iE; ~ L" ~ i;;' ~". g~ o IT"" o c coO ~; ~, i~!~ ~~. ~~ o-~. ..... ~ g 0 ;;ta-u . "'0 ~ m n' ,..... (!) (J) CD .... N (!) -.....J }> t-- t-g r-;;;; f--;Q;s ~ - ~ <> - 1610 - ~ f6ig - '" a tffl - ,on ~ Ij566 f----" r-- .." - 10. - 1669 m 676 IT"" ijIf-, 1601 N- (!) 607 -.....Jr- CD 1M! . ......z ./:>.::;: I~ ........ ., ./:>. - 1~"ts 144"1 ---,:ua 14tH ~ ----;m 14~ t-- ~ '-;m 1<'" - I<:rt r---;m 1<36 ~ I<3P ~ o ~ ~ ~'" 50 o r- P> f- - ----;;;t N ,-.... 51) I I o o c: ;;U -i ... ~ W'8 U ~:= ca ~: ~ F0'46Z;:;: r... N ....... 1-4. -I46f c... __ \ "" " I","> II> _ ~N iD "'..._ U r~ , '" a ~ -'- ~ ~~ .~ ~ ~ ............... ~ ::::~r:::~ r. J~ l::: ;:; ;:;; '5"" g ~ ! d Ell ~ -< ID r ~ II> ill '" o Ii , ~ '600 1602 U 1W1-'- - 1&b6 ... t60S '610 i== '" -~ .... <> o UOO ~ ~~ ~ -Th-7~~ - '<00 O'! 141f 1413 -....J 1416 ~ ;;-,:- m- ;:-;- N fUti .a..!iP "> """ -" US, -~- J.I(}8~ '-n~_ o -iD !!.:g- '4~ N90m '" "'12 N '-183 N,-IJli N US ~ ,-tag ~~7 (..(..(3 _ ..6 "'4? J.l4~N g s. c;,\.,.J ... " o 1t, en o rJj '- ~ ~ ~ :;: s. HL _CREST 60 SAN RalO '" '" ;J '" ... '" ,)~::;, <- ... ,~ \1( '" '" .... ~~ ~ '>- ~ "'"~ u ~ " "'\ <A "> ~ " ~ f; !! " .. ;;; ~(mBi ~W ... o o ~ <> .. '" ~I I:: .. ~ ~~~~ ~ m~ ~ <> .. <> <> I '- UU<t. l)1(jvt. ~ ..... I ~ i ~ i ~ I~ ! ~ I I _ I I I T~--+--T-I- ((;) fYll "> I--( ~ ff--..- <A ,..., t-----1 'oC.../ t--- I~D U CD "-J NfS'1'7 "384 --.. r--:-- . "',37 '--- ~ " g 60 .. .. Ii: .... .. .. ~ .. ~ ~ ~ ~~~ A~ - ~ O~~~~~ _~:"": f;0 ....,..;~........ ~ ~ U '" '" '.fez ~ ,<16'7 u,~ _ ..-14(16 1468 0 L... en ,<6,,", Its\~ UTI ;;J tno I~-""" ~ '472 CXI ~<77 '" l,n4 - '1"'1 ~ ~ 1<711 17"9 1480 01 N U8Z 0 UlI1 1484 (.J'I I<BIJ ~\L f.I&()~ U lJeo ~ 1482 ::: -;.. "'''" ""~ '" U~6...... ...... 146lJ 0 <.0 '''61 <D "> '1-170....... ~a "'VI ~ NU75 ~ 1<77 -...J tV'.f7'9 p.,J 1.(81 0) II ~ 1487 "" un ::ju - u '" ~ '" 4l- UH '<8. I< 1187 ... I'" '" I W N .... 2~ (0 r...c. c.r. ... o~ ~ ~ A\IE ".. Iln: " ~ .. ~ I u t-..), ...... ~ !2 '" !! .. <> '" - - '" ~ a '61OU .; ~AFK ;:;; 0> '" ... '" '" ~ L ~ " /",,, 2 ,g 60 ~ ~ ~ ;; ~~~~ ~ ~ " - - ~ ~ ~ ~ U; !',:":.. 00 0; I ~~~ "'-J U6~ C;; 1H5 ~~ 60 ..<> ~-",~ ~..- '" _gl37'1 .~ '3lJ(J ~ , .. ....':'~ ~ "'0> "" ~ "" " ~ ~ ~ g I>J q, 1984 _ 13 SO - ~ , lP '... ~ <''0 "'0 '" 0 w 7-:> ~......~......o ~......~ uo, &0 .......'okl ~ 1"-1 ~ U OJ .,.. r. ~ ~ 01 ~ 0; f~o.s to :: t: ~: '" '" -"''''I''' U :;~N ~~~ ~ ,:~: ~-r-~ ;;2f -;;7 0 ~ I N ("l ~ :;~:~ c;. ',-:': - ,:~: U ~J1fi' :;~:" ~~~ ~ z ~;:~ c: ::j :;:;.... ;:: N lD :::: ~ ~ 'b~~~ en 0:_ ~"6r.o1 __'./17 ~ ute::: Ju f./'7 ~ ~:\.. C! -;.. ~ <;, U1B en Ut9 I UIS;::-"'" 0 '4'9 C 1418 U; " d"az .........,p ~<f" ->i i!..!...2fL - 2. 142/ ~~H--~ Z 1420 /' > ~ eft .....~I "'-> r,-o/zzaJ ~uZ3""I~u~ ~t42!l 1422~.JI!{ l.D ....~1T ..... .-:.'0 f.l2 --'" ....~..,d' .... ~"-~..;;~ ~-::;:IO ~;; "::: 0 7_ -~ 00:$,&:' It.):;iiO'~ ..!!~"" I<ZtI '" ,--,"'~'~ .J ~ ~~ ~ ~~{..p~~o') ~Slr-- U31 rr1 l,ul() I -. tJ!JlJ N ~ _ "'-:'".. ~<$I> '4#~Y ..... '.(85 ~ 14U(JI "'-l H3!J 2 t4S.'l'-.j J'0,4.J ~ ,s. ~ _ _"", ..jY~ 1431 tv 1~5 14:U tn .--P~~ ~ ~'...........~ 6'> -" ~ 1 (J1 ~ U36~ to un ~J36 0'1 ....... oCff p~ ..........~ 0'1 ..-- ~~- (..lU3:9 ,-l3B N ...... ~ ....._ ";. -to ~ t----- ,J.(O N ..... ~ ~ .....~ "do --'" en U:J3 1./,(3 U ..p. '113 (J'l W...._ ";-d" ...._ ~ ~ (J1 ~ lD t U./ -" ,U6 _ -" ~ c.......( ~ 'I-I46N UI'1 ~ ....~.,. d1 ~ O"r U4 ~ ~ ~ a~ --..J Ug ,. !~ Iz~ ,:: f#i6 .....~ " f.l6()o- ~ !a ;: "'if o 11(14 lO ~ 1"1 l~ I./U Ol ~#11 '#7.'l --..J ~I:: U71 ~f'1'1'./'1D 147. :: 1.tT1 cnU78c.n~ ~ . lUll "'U"'... ~ ~ ...... 14M >0: % roo c.... U2S f.l:M ~ '#i1I ~ 1430 W UHf 1418 ~ . u 1!J7(f ~ ~~ ~ 80 f 138lJ ; _.... i.i 5 N.' 140' == ,<loa I N 140' N ~ 1-103 ~ '.lO~ -" 11 0 o '~t-uii5 == UO./ N jp)......'406 " 140'"155 '4(M Jgco ~ 4011 = f./08 W ::;0; 7-<<JS .(It 55 ,.,,0 ~'1./" .,,355 141z.I>o,l ~ lit UI61-- 14td .......... (J1 14" (]'I tjQ; IU'l 0> 1<19 ~_~ 01 !~~ == 1414 en ;:;. ::~ t~ = ~;~ (424"'" :; (423 I<:rt ...... U3.J ~ _"'0 <0 '''20 ~ (XI ,-'./.3 SO 1430 CD U ~ t--(Q H!U] l.D L_ o ...... (.(311 N I#n '''''3 1./#6 _ = 1447 CCI ,-I#g -I -: /fUjli! a iUfJ/105_7S N. ~ 14Sf .... 1455 80 o r;; ~ o ~ U60~ OQ) ~ 1<60 :;: to: U6-.f ~ 1450 ;: U6B ~ ~ 146'7 '.(1$0 :so .. T#6Z ~ .. 'UU.... :j 'J"~ 1468 ~ G:: ......... U) 14S/I ~ 0. 1-489 iI ,no oS.,. I 7; '<In ~ 1f.#7#. 8: ~ <: 14'73 -.......Ii -4 '47-1 ~ 01,;:; '-176 I"7S ~ ;:: un ./78 0 UIHJ - UM 1.1.2 .. 083 ...... us.r .... .., 7.fl/.S 1486 ... 1-187 I4I18-r: t Do "'88 '" . } co 14811 "-' -" r--c;-- ~ -ag~50 Ii> U "' 1 '" "I~'" I S_t IB_ ~3 " '" ~ ~ ~ ~ <> .. o ::u rr1 (J) -l ~ "', . ~ }> ~^ ;;;rr1 Ll }> ::u ^ ~ ~ so ~~ ~ ~ i'l !l~T ~ ....1 flO "'~l ,';' t '" I ~ ~~~ 60 IlO ;: '" ~ ... '" flO /'J I ~ "'I --~ '608 ::5: ~ 0+ :;:d ~ r, II I I t..J T 899;:: ~@ USl~ f./9./ ...... UK CIO t! ; :: "" I 00 O! ~ '" o I!l :: a ':: ...... ~ o rJj '" t=C "': ~ I'" ,- rr1 GJ u ~ ~ N 1521 en lfi2D (0 t I'J ~ '" 1527 8 ,5U a; cp '" ... 163 _ 1528 ~ t~ ~ ... '~c;.r; '" r<1 168. ~ ;:;; r-- ~ - ........ ,.... ~ ,.<~!"",- 1649 ao 164~"'" SU t..l ~ '5J9 co 155 _ 5Sb 1>0 <5 a..... 1664 .:: g a ,"c. , _ """ I . UflO :so " ~ ;;; , ,.~ , 1...8 ~ ~ ~ ;: (m lI: ~ . >:,\~ - lI: -" o (~BI HIJ.2 " - '-183 ".. I: .. 1-0/81 ... '''aB ~ USI 0;.0 f./!J3 ~ ,.". - UB7 ~ "'1<191 ~ '490 , " ~ ,./!U "'I< ~ -IN . ~ N. g ~ ~~ f 1500 OJ "$"':: lso.a ()) U 1511 1S1~ <..n c; ~ '" '" "> ... ,s" <It ,... ~ <> N. (61~ '" <> t62IJ ..... ~ 16.14 aJ t6U ~ 0; ~'" -=-CIo> 15.Y6 '" '5~O .;: c tii..U u I 1560 ;::; ~ - q ~N. CREST '566 ,. "'''" " 1 '" '5'~ ~ '" '" ,,,,,6 '" o 1670 a N. I..4KE <'i 1_ '" o 1601 1903 '" 'M5 16<1 ISIO ..... '" '"0' rr: ; ;; I;;; ~ ; I DRtj' '" ... ':l~IIl:~~ '" - ;;: 6 1'll:~ ~=:~ " '" RU "'u: r:, t: II~ 0> IUD RU "'~-; <> <> "" " s: ~ ::\1 -" 145' -g ," (4&0 ~ U,Z 7 ~ ... ..... ,J r: "06 '" r; .1:: ~~mr UTi ~ Ins rG W.O " 1.18# ~ !."!'I . ,"'" U ~ a ~ - . HGH .HID m: ~5(U"""'CN '" U 1610 '" <> <> <> CUNWOOO ~ ?i ~ '" <> :l 1660 .... N ~~" '" '" . IUS '" 60 6'70 ;s4l- ORI\ ., '" '" o 16< '004 ...... IG06 lD 1808 ~ Cl) 16 ." ~ ~~gg~ :3 J>-'< 2 ^ ii'~~b ~ c 3"0 QI II,<:::J .. ..,. 0 ~ !~ ~ " 0';' :J .- ~ )>0- DEC-27-2000 16:06 P.01 r :~. .. I ., ,.', , !, ,I, 'I , . , f)-, -;1.. 7 r e1"phlln" 17271 5.10-9'J:: 1 December 14, 2000 1.tt\40 49111 Slree' ,\),)nl1. CIl:i1rWillcr. FI. .-r- /0: X~~~ Ctn~ r' 5 -h r) e.- tI~ r/,'" \ Mr. Bill Home, City Manager City of Clearwater P. o. 80x 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758 RE: PST A Park Street Terminal Alternate Sites. ----.....---..,... Dear Mr. Horne, ...., '.....~ Thank you and your staff for assistance in trying to identify additional possible sitesforth~IElcation of PSTA's new downtown terminal. We have reviewed the three sites in great detail. Unforturiat~ly, as our search over the last few years showed us, the sites your staff identified do not meet the criteria for the new terminal. We had outlined the basic criteria in a letter to Cynd; Hardin, of your staff. The three sites that your staff identified do not meet the size requirements, are outside the downtown area, and would likely not be approved by the federal government, which is teQuired under the federal grant for this project. We would provide the following specific comments on each site: , '.---.,.-.,..-- Site #2: Cleveland Street between Evergreen and Hillcrest "lJl' This site is smaller than our two-acre minimum requirement and would severely restrict the amount of bus bays as well as the size of the terminal. There are several viable businesses as well as single-fam~y residences that would need to be purchased, condemned, or relocated. Federal regulations prohibit the condemnation of any property for this project. Access to the traft'tc'light at Hillcrest and Gulf-to-Bay is limited and would restrict our ability to enter and exit ~~e site easily. The existing residential neighborhood to the north would likely prevent this site from being approved by the federal gov~rnment. , " Site #3: Gulf-to-Bay and f!fillcrest between Cleveland and Park This site is smaller than our two-acre minimum requirement which would restrict the size of our bus terminal. ,~ j . ;'1 -\ , OOOOS564.WPO r.)e.' r,", ? H ~jfnOO. t. u/ ". L'J i".; " f-.!""i DEC-27-2000 16:06 . . P.02 ., , . , Mr. Bill Home, City Manager PSTA Alternate Terminal Sites December 14, 2000 Page 3 DEt:i It fl(].' c. I I.DU This site has approximately ten viable businesses, several single-family homes, and a multi- unit apartment complex, which would have to be condemned and relocated. Again PSTA cannot condemn any property for this project. This block sits on a hill, which presents severe grade problems (for Florida). Buses must be near level for wheelchair ramps to function and for wheelchair patrons to use them easily. This would necessitate somehow terracing or leveling the block to make it usable. The remainder of this block is occupied by seven existing single-family residences, which would likely prevent the federal govemment from approving this site. Site #4: Gulf-to-Bay between Highland and DeLeon Street This site has several viable businesses including a large c/assicrauto business, a convenience store, and a Laundromat. These businesses, the latter two of which seem to serve the neighborhood, would need to be purchased, condemned, or relocated. Gulf-to-Bay fronts the property, and would provide good access to the east and west. However, the other two streets (Highland and DeLeon) would likely cause problems if used to access Drew Street and points north. The site is directly abutted to the north by existing single.family residences, which again would most likely prevent approval for this site from the federal government. Summary: The three sites each have multiple property owners which would make it very time consuming and expensive for land acquisition, jf all of the properties for anyone of these sites could be purchased Voluntarily. None of the three sites offers the advantages that the proposed laura Street site offers. The closest of the three, Site #4, is approximately one mile from the current terminal and the furthest, Site #2, is approximately 1 ~ miles from the current terminal. These other sites would result in additional costs as well as cause substantial routing and scheduling revisions. By comparison, the proposed Laura Street site is 3/8 of a mile from the Park Street Terminal. Laura Street offers enough property to accommodate PST A's current needs as well as room for future growth. Additional, this property allows for on-site stormwater retention, which placed at the west end of the site as proposed, will provide a landscaped and fenced buffer. This buffer will provide a physical and visual separation of the terminal activity as well as the bus movements at that end of the property from the day~care center and apartment complex at the west end of this site.. 00008S64.WPD DEC-27-2000 16:07 . . P.03 Mr. Bill Home, City Manager PSTA Altemate Terminal Sites December 14,2000 Page 3 As was brought out in the presentation to the Community Redevelopment Agency meeting in November, the representative of the Owner of the property testified that in eleven years no less than six potential buyers have investigated developing this property in various residential projects, including as low-income housing, Each potential developer came to the conclusion that the market would not support residential use on this parcel. With regard to the Park Street Terminal, as you know, this site would not allow for the construdion of the new terminal, unless the adjacent County property is available to be utilized for the terminal. The use of the County property 8S part of this project is problematic because of conflicts between the federal requirements related to the grant to PST A and the County's restrictions on the property. At this time, this issue is still unresolved. We have contacted representatives of the Federal Transit Administration to discuss further the federal restrictions on PST A's participation in a joint project with the City and the County. We were advised that PST A would not be allowed to use the federal funding for this project, except for costs directly associated with the terminal. They advised us that they would review the allocation of the construction costs, even to the extent to ensure that PSTA was not contributing to costs of constructing the foundation beyond what is necessary for the terminal. In order for this project to be considered, the City would have to take the lead in resolving the land issue and in managing the construction and maintenance of the parking garage. In consideration of the preceding review and the great amount of time and money that we have expended trying to find a suitable location, we hope that you and your staff will agree with us that the Laura Street site is the logical place for PST A to locate the new downtown passenger terminal. Sincerely, PINELLAS SUNCOAST TRANSIT AUTHORITY Ro~eyb~or MJS/drnt cc: Alan S_ Zimmet, General Counsel MiChael J. Siebel, Director of Planning 1/, , ) . D C[' ') fJ 2' aa . 1_. ". (I . (] 00008564.WPD TOTi=lL P.03 (\'l 1 \,\( {?'~ ( ~J _ nV '. \' '" :\' ,:v , DATE 12/11/00 12/11/00 12/12/00 , 12/12/00 12/12/00' 1213/00 12/13/00 12/13/00 12/13/00 12/13/00 12/13/00 c,\,JJ -: 12/13/00 (... \ \ ..l.>~ ..., -,,~. .,.\~l"" ,00 12/13/00 \"\'. \'l.- TIME 3:30 PM 4: 12 PM 9:39 AM 10:41 AM I :55 PM 8:41 AM F'f... 8:49 AM 9:33 AM 9:34 AM 11:17 AM 11:29 AM 1 :35 PM 1:52 PM ~---~- --- ----~--- -- - -~-l VOICE MAIL PHONE # 449-9876 813-927-6897 813-927-6897 530-9921 x4304 MESSAGE Hang up David Devany with Beck. RE: 180 N. Hercules. Want to change the address to Grand. The building faces Grand and therefore would like a Grand address. Please call. Dave Devany - same message as above Sarah w/PST A. Returned your call. '.~ T J\.1k= \2-l.C-\Jti ~;t (,,~ 813-630-0805/ Amy Hess /ltTVVLlJV l t..\ l..4/0U 813-620-1460 Kelly Powell with Kelly Horn & Assoc. RE: looking for a water/sewer letter for pharmacy at GTB and Belcher. ~II} L 'lJ iSL{2. 813-880-8881 813-880-8881 4 1-99.:/ 813-281-2900 / 224-4786 455-7041 Tom Bennett with King Engineering. RE: Project --- dedication of lines . ,1 7 ". _ It:-- ~. B i J - t. Y &. 100 M if c' I U::. G - . r: U.:-S Steve Messer, attorney for Moorings at Sand Key. Need to - talk to you regarding the dedication of the lift station on Sand Key. Don with lITO Utilities told me to contact you. ~"..E.f-\ ,'-^E )~ ~\, ~ Tom Bennet w/King Engineering. RE: Dedication of water line - Park Place, Parcel 3A. Please call. Don Malone with Caldwell Banker. Two issues: 1579 Eunice Lane - How high can fence be. Backs up to church. 1260 Carassas - Can a 6' fence be put up so they can use the back yard for boat storage adding a platform, also putting in an antique car with cover. Dan Glazer w/CDM. Calling about a meetin on 12/20 SWFMD @ 10 AM. We request your presence as it is in your jurisdiction to hear discussion about Clearwater wells project at Lipton Park and pipeline routing that we are proposing in your area. We could leave from my Tampa office and go to SWFWMD which is on the east side of town on 30 1. You could leave your car at my office and then pick it up after the meeting. Cal ASAP, if you can or cannot attend meeting. Tyler Bingham - Called about getting sewer & water Mark Carlson. At Belagio site they are putting in water main and using wrong kind of pipe. Do,we have plans for lift station yet? , *11"" tJ ~} .~ " '.,.,jr , ~o \~() ~ t;. +--' \,<'\ r,~ 'f1\ \,; \ 1. ,.~- , v 12/13/00 3:23 PM 863-665-8718 or George w/ Automated Consulting RE: Comfort Suites cell phone #863- 559-8849 12/14/00 8:02 AM 813-636-9229 Dan Glaser - Please call regarding meeting with SWFWMD V for 12/20. I need to get your answer. 0.. J.-z d v lJ-..-C. '\ \,^,\:.b~Al) f 12/15/00 10:59 AM l530-9921 x4304 Sarah w/PST A t/ L...E-.c r IvU;:.5J4l>;:: Ou Pl ~ <: '" 00 Pl '1:1 VI :=';~rl- Pl c>> 0 g:tI)l'""I> c>> ~ ~;:tltIi Pl ;;::l ~ ~ oo'~ VlP"'~ ~ ~S-~ ",_0" ] ~ 0- g g. 0- '" - -- -- - - - - ----- - - ---------~--_.__._,-_.._-- ---- ----- -- -.. -.. -- --- cf:: ~ ~ ~"* \~ ~.~~C> ~~~~ ~ D.:2r;~ l'~ ~~ ~ (J '"d ~~ CI) ~ ~CI) o CI) >-l -<:3.....CI) Pl Pl >-3 (J ..... _. . J;:: >-3 . >-3 ::r:~R=>to to O' ~ ~ ~> ~> tIi ~l'CI)~ CJ ~ 'Tj .... ::;. ~ R=> ~ ~O;+~ Pl c>> ..... '1:1'" '" c>> '" '" ..... c>> 0\ 0\ N -..J ~~ 00 I! l' - -..J 00 00 00 0 0\ "N 00 "~ "~ >-3 0 0 0 0 ~.:x" 0 0 0 0 0 0 CI) '" '" '" '" '" >-l ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ N tIi ? ? ? ? ? CJ'1:I Pl ::1. ;;l ~ O'CI ..... t1l N' (1) ~ CI) to VI N '0 o o '" ~ ? l'CI) N N - N W - tIi'1:l w -..J 0 00 N - <> 0 0 0 0 0 0 tIi(J l'Bi -- \Ol' otIi 0 0< Cl)tIi 0 ~ ~ \0 ~ W \0 '1:Il' >CI) ~ (J'Tj tIio 2 CI)?;:l i-3 0 €.09 ~~~~~ ~~. ft(J~ Pl €.09 (J€.09Pl€.09€.09 l' ~ 0 '" N oO~NO > ..... ~ (1) '1:1 0 '" (1) ~ . ~f o' ~ (1) ~ 0' (1) -..J J;:: _. (1) -..J _. a 2 '" N ~"""",N""" >-3 ~ ~'"'-'-.::~..... ::s 0 ~ .... ~ ~ -<~~~~ ~ _. s::, ..... 0.. O'CI :3(1)~ ~(1) Pl 0..'1:1 _. >-3 0.. '1:1 >-3 (J > ~ r+ }~ ~ ~ .... <: CI) P>~CI)> 0 Pl O'CI ~>-3 R=> S" ~ s' CI) ~ ~ ~ > >-3 (1) . t:l 2 0 C1 >< >< ts~ C1 (1) c>> >>-3 > '" '" zo ~ ~ ~(1)Pl'1:l(J l'tIi C1 (1) rii ~ el 0 tIi(J t'-'.1 ~ ~ _. ~ J;:: <0 g Jg' ~Jg' ~ tIiz 0.. '" c>> ~o '" l<1' o~ tIiO '1:1€.09 c>> w .....VI c>> VI :2~ :3 CI) c>> ..... '" . '1:I0'CI0'CI '1:100''1:1 OtIi C>> ;;l Pl 0 0 ..... Pl 0 ~ (t",;;l:=:::S,"",~J;::'1:I '-' '" O'CI (") '" - _.::s ::;. .-, _ C>> (1) q 0 ~ .'"1" Pl ~. 0 (1) c -- (1Q "'< ....,.. :3 ..... 0 ~ (") 0 0 - o' (1) ~ ~ ;;::l ..... - (1) ~ '" ~- 7' '1:1 7' '-'::S Pl ,:::.,-,:::., .,..,"'0 O'~CI)OCl) <:(1)....., ...... ..... '<:..... (1) VJC>>VJ "'0' C>>R=> ......... >-3'1:1 gr Ei ~ g. '1:1 1); .... (1) .g ~ C>> . ~;r C>> ~(") Cl)Z g S" (1) " '" c. ~ --' g g ~ ~(") Pl ~.g'~~ ~ t~. ~ ~ tn. a 0 CI) rg '"g. '1:1 '" _. 0 (1) Ei Pl CI) J;:::=:J;::(1)(")~>-3 (1) .'"1" ~ Pl P"' >,.... '<; .'"1" 0" Pl I:J'...... o '<; 0 '" _. l' ~ @ rii~FPl ~ ~ . I~ 0 Ei ~ l--' ~ ~ ~ '" <: .'o!. 0 CI) Er (1) g, _. ..... '1:1'''' ,<:-<' 11 0~ ;;;: g:9;;lc>> o' ~~ ~ ] R=> 0' Ef3 ~ .... S' O'CI - '" ,...f.(")~>-30Cl) P"' 2iJ P"' ~ _. 0 (1) J;:: 0 J;:: fii :3 J;:: (1) ao..~rl>O-~ C>> P"' _. '" 0.. 0" . 0' ::s ~ _. 0 ....]2.Pl~<: 0".... J;:: ~:::-' ~ C>> ~ 0.. _. ..... Pl S' C>> ::s 0.. ~jQC>> 0">-30>-3 C>> o. 0 Plooo (") . P"'@~I:J' ~:3 .~.... J;:: 0 ~ ;::1:..... 0 o-~ S o .... ~. 8 ~ ~ n ~ C>> J;:: ~ el 0 J;:: . ~0..~5~ -< @" ci2l -< S' '1:1 S . J;:: (") ~] ~ p-. ~ ~....<;:=:o.. S' ~ =::..:~ CD O'CI~ - ~~~ ~~ ;;::.. ~. ""'-.... ~'--'~ '1:1 G; G; 10 C ,..... CI) ::J tIi o ~ tIi ?;:l III /7~~ Clwdl0~.lltr&tUttre fif#JfJmrjjJt17/tifJ11W/fr; . I~~. J;h?~~!tn I(JU/~ /cw f!!/tf;O,!!1@~ ~J~!lAJ&/D~ ~/2f:I'iJ7~ , ~~-f trA-atm1 tlJtf,Ri1lJ~1e r /;i;:;Iotitm ur au ~ ;:/~~ . frI~--- ~ 102J;b;y~#~ 1#'$# /7w// .JWr ~. P!?l;f! #llllk ~kU/4 &J!TA.- j;f t? ~ dJ1 t{:{)Z . --I1~~Jf/~ if tit fl/dl~dJ!f?M-~~~c?:;? #~ . ~~~Jt;Y&? ~ $~ .~~ ~ ~ ~;f{l!d/iJYjJlty~~;i/lytil4Jlde?(fo~ ~//0~) ~ . -/1fr- t!0Ilk-/OfQv/?p;~;1J/Ji ~ . / ~tMt hl;e tlJ1h;t:J~ -&~~d- ~ B;J/~XKlbo' ~////7J/U4<--I-~~. I . 1IJl!/:l mtd/J!!!I!t~ ~ ~tlbJJttI~" ~ -/&;Jad~OjPi::b ~~ 1!J!tfr tclW'.40/Jr-1(fl/m, ~~ ]1 41T}1L~m~/4rrM ; I &SlptZOfJ qtlJtlk~~~ flj 4&Jn;}X;j Ou/~ /.~ j;l;It/~4J- ;#1-f7~: -7/t~.~ rfY -- aii6.LtJG -tU#Jv/itJh1flJO;!5 cf0 ~~-~ ~ ~to l!J1sm ~~ r ~ fit.,. ~,?JL 'd/M.-r-d/~r: f /J)n1J;+ . ~~(fWr/~~ t!aJ;1@-0b&)~ IU&)')'}:f ~ ~ /~ fa-, .~ . ., ........., BUilDING PERMIT ISSUANCE AGREEMENT THIS BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made on March~, 2000, between the CllY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, a Florida municipal corporation, ("Cityll). and the CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOUS TRUST ("Church") R E ClIAl: S: A. The Church wishes the City to issue it a building permit for construction of a building known as the Church of Scientology Ministerial Training and Pastoral Counseling Center (Center) B. The certified site plan required by City Ordinance for the Center provides for the construction of 809 parking spaces ("Required Parking"), however, the Church is not prepared to submit construction plans for the garage prior to the issuance of the building permit for the Center, as required by the City. C. The Church may pay to the City a fee instead of providing all of the parking on site as permitted by City ordinance for the purpose of providing additional parking in the downtown area. D. The Church desires to pay simultaneous with the execution of this Agreement, the sum of One Million Five Hundred Three Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($1.503,000.00), representing payment in lieu for Three Hundred Thirty Four (334 spaces) of the Required Parking. E. The City and the Church have agreed that the Church will post a letter of credit with the City to assure that the Church will make provision for the balance of the Required Parking (475 spaces), either by payment of a fee in lieu of construction or construction of parking I or a combination of the two, for the Center as required by City ordinance. F. The City and the Church wish to set forth their understanding in writing. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, it is agreed as follows: 1. Recitals. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference. 2. letter of Credit: Issuance of Buildina Permit. The Church shall deliver to the City an original letter of credit in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A ("Letter of Credit") and payment of One Million Five Hundred Three Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($1.503,000) represents payment in lieu for Three Hundred Thirty Four (334) spaces of the Required Parking. Simultaneously with such delivery, the City will issue to the Church the building and other permits which are required for the Church to commence .- , r, construction of the Center pursuant to the construction drawings previously filed by the Church with the City. . 3. Reduction and/or Return of Letter of Credit From time to time (prior to the City having drawn down the Letter of Credit in full), the City will allow a reduction in the amount of the Letter Of Credit. dollar for dollar. with amounts paid by the Church to the City as Parking Fee (as defined in the Letter of Credit). This reduction may be in the . form of an amendment of the Letter of Credit or substitution of a replacement letter of credit in the new amount. which replacement shall then become the Letter of Credit. At such time (prior to the City having drawn down the Letter of Credit in full) as the Church has made provision for parking for the Center. whether by providing construction drawings to the City for Four Hundred Seventy Five (475) spaces, payment of the Parking Fee for Four Hundred Seventy Five (475) spaces. or some combination of submission of construction drawings and payment of the Parking Fee. the City shall return the Letter of Credit to the Church. 4. Effect of Drawdown of Letter of Credit. A drawdown by the City of the Letter of Credit shall serve as payment or partial payment of any Parking Fee which may be owing to the City in connection with construction of the Center. The obligation of the Church to construct the balance of Four Hundred Seventy Five (475) parking spaces to serve th.e Center shall be reduced by the number of parking spaces paid for by a drawdown of the Letter of Credit. 5. Issuance of Certificate of Occuoancy. The City shall issue a certificate of occupancy for the Center upon satisfaction of all conditions precedent to such issuance. The parking requirement for the Center shalf be deemed to have been met by the payment (whether by draw down under the Letter of Credit. direct payment by the Church to the City. or otherwise) of the Parking Fee for Four Hundred Seventy Five (475) parking spaces, the construction of Four Hundred Seventy Five (475) parking spaces, or Some combination of construction and payment of the Parking Fee as authorized and approved by the City all of which are in excess of the Three Hundred Thirty Four (334) parking spaces satisfied by payment in lien concurrent herewith. 6. Reopening of Agreement. This Agreement is based upon the assumption that the Parking Fee will remain at Four Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($4.500) per space. Should the City increase the Parking Fee. then the parties shall renegotiate this Agreement in good faith and the City shall not draw under the Letter of Credit until such negotiations have deadlocked, provided. however, that no certificate of occupancy shall be issued for the Center until the City's parking requirements have been met. The City and Church acknowledge that. depending on the actual number of spaces constructed by the Church, the Church may voluntarily pay to the City an amount in excess of what it would otherwise be obligated to pay the City as a fee in lieu of parking. 7. Certificate of Occuoancy. No Certificate of Occupancy shall be issued for the Center until such time as the City's parking requirements have been met. 8. Notices. Any notice to be given to or served upon any party hereto. in, connection herewith, must be in writing. and may be given by certified mail or 2 .. ,. ..... guaranteed overnight delivery service, return receipt requested and shall be deemed to have been given given and received when a certified letter containing such notice. property addressed, with postage prepaid, is deposited in the United States Mail or when delivered into the custody of the overnight delivery service; if given otherwise than by certified mail or guaranteed overnight delivery service, it shall be deemed to have been given when delivered to and received by the party to whom it is addressed. Notices shall be given to the parties hereto at the following addresses: FOR CITY: FOR CHURCH: City Manager 112 South Osceola Ave. Clearwater, FL 33756 Mr. Tom DeVocht 319 South Garden Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 WITH A COpy TO: WITH A COpy TO: City Attorney 112 South Osceola Ave. Clearwater, FL 33756 E. D. Armstrong III. Esq. P.O. Box 1368 Clearwater, FL 33757 . Either party hereto may, at any time by giving five (5) days' written notice to the other. party hereto, designate any other address in substitution of the foregoing address to which notice shall be given and other parties to whom copies of all notices hereunder shall be sent. 9. Entire Agreement: Modification. This Agreement embodies and constitutes the entire understanding between the parties with respect to the matters described herein. AU prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement. Neither this Agreement nor any provision hereof may be waived, modified, amended, discharged, or terminated except by an instrument in writing signed by the party against which the enforcement of such waiver. modification, amendment, discharge or termination is sought, and then only to the extent set forth in such instrument. 10. Applicable Law. This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of Florida. 11 . Headinas. Descriptive headings are for convenience only and shall not control or affect the meaning or construction of any provision of this Agreement. 12. Bindina Effect. This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their successors and assigns. 13. CountelJ2arts. This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts. each constituting a duplicate original, but all such counterparts constituting one and the same Agreement. . 3 , 14. Interpretation. Whenever the context hereof shall so require, the singular shall include the plural, the male gender shall include the female gender and the neuter, and vice versa, and the use of the terms "include," "includes" and "including" shall be without limitation to the items which follow. . 15. Severabilitv. In case anyone or more of the provisions hereof shall for any reason be held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect, such invalidity, . illegality or unenforceability shall not affect any other provision hereof, and this Agreement shall be construed as if such invalid, illegal or unenforceable provision had never been contained herein. 16. Joint Drafting. The parties acknowledge that each has played an equal part in the negotiation and drafting of this Agreement, and in the event any ambiguities should be realized in the construction or interpretation of this Agreement, such ambiguities shall not be construed against either party solely on account of authorship. 17. Waiver. The waiver of one or more defaults by any party to this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of any subsequent default of the same or any other provision of this Agreement under the s'ame or other circumstances. 18. Attornev's Fees. etc. Should either party employ an attorney or attorneys to enforce any of the provisions hereof, or to protect its interest in any matter arising hereunder, or to recover damages for the breach hereof, the party prevailing shall be entitled to recover from the other party all reasonable costs, charges and expenses~ including attorneys' fees, the value of time charged by paralegals and/or other staff members operating under the supelVision of an attorney. and other legal costs, expended or incurred in connection therewith. 19. Time is of the Essence. The parties acknowledge that time is of the essence for each time and date specifically set forth in this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written; provided, however, that for the purpose of determining "the date hereof," as used in this Agreement, such date shall be the last date any of the parties hereto executes this Agreement. CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA ~l By: ~ Michael J. Roberto City Manager Attest: APProZd a4 form: Jf- Leslie K. Dougall-Sides Assistant City Attorney 4 - , , , .--., CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOUS TRUST: U-" ",/ . / 8Y:\:~ c/~ Tom DeVocht, Trustee As: f~Y 5t3-UN2 i(:.us'7C:i= eg;~ y ~/T~. Signature ~~/Lrt V. !fJwaAJ Signature Print name 20542Ov2 5 .- .-\ In connection with the construction of the Church of Scientology Ministerial Training and Pastoral Counseling Center (Center) in Clearwater, Florida. the owner has on or before December 31, 2000, failed to (1) pay to the City of Clearwater, Florida (City) a fee of USD 4,500 (City to insert fee amount) per parking space as established by the City Commission (Parking Fee) for four hundred seventy five (475) parking spaces (the balance of the Required Parking), for a total payment to the City of usn $2,137.500.00 (City to insert total fee due) or (2) receive a building permit for construction of the balance of the required parking which will selVe the Center, or (3) receive a building permit for construction of fewer spaces than the balance of the Required Parking. and pay the Parking Fee for the number of parking spaces fewer than the balance of the Required Parking, resulting in an aggregate Parking Fee being payable to the City in the amount of USD (City to insert amount). 207474 V.1 March 24,2000 IRREVOCABLE STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT NO. SB99-8243 Beneficiary: City of Clearwater, FL 112 South Osceola Avenue Clearwater~ FL 33756 Attn: City Attorney - Pam Akin Expiration: March 1, 2001 Amount: USD2,137,500.00 Dear Madam: At the request of Church of Scientology Religious Trust, 6331 Hollywood Blvd.. Los Angeles, CA 90028. we hereby establish our Irrevocable Standby Letter of Credit in your favor up to an aggregate amount of Two Million One Hundred Thirty Seven Thousand Five Hundred USDollars, (USD2,137,500.00) This credit is available for payment against presentation of your draft(s) at sight drawn on California Bank and Trust, bearing the clause: ~~Drawn under Credit No. SB99-8243 of California Bank and Trust, Los Angeles, Califoroia" accomp~ied by the following documents: This original Letter of Credit. Beneficiary's statement, signed by the City Manager or City Attorney~ certifying: In connection with the construction of the Church of Scientology Ministerial Training and Pastoral Counseling Center (Center) in Clearwater, Florida. the owner has on or before December 31 ~ 2000~ failed to: 1) Pay to the City of Clearwater, Florida (City) a fee ofUSD4,500.00 per parking space as established by the City Commission (parking Fce) for four hundred seventy five (475) parking spaces (the balance of the required parking)~ for a total payment to the City ofUS2,137,500.00, or 2) Receive a building pennit for construction of the balance oftbe required parking which will serve the Center, or 3) Receive a building permit for construction of fewer spaces than the balance of the required parking, and pay the parking fee for the number of parking spaces fewer than INTERNATIONAL BAr4KING GROUl' 250 East First Street, Suite. 500 . Los Ange.les . C~liforni~ . 90012 ... the balance of the required parking, resulting in an aggregate parking fee payable to the City in the amount ofUSD Partial drawing are permitted. We hereby agree with you that all draft(s) drawn under and in compliance with the terms of this letter of credit will be honored upon presentation by overnight courier service to California Bank & Trust, 250 East First Street, Suite 500, Los Angeles, CA 90012. This credit is subject to the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits (1993 Revision), International Chamber of Commerce, Publication No. 500. ~ u~horized Signature rnma Montoro Assistant Vice-President TOTAL P.09 . . Item #D5 - 100 North Greenwood Avenue: Trust for Rehabilitation and Nurturinq Youth and Families, Inc. - Owner. Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority - Applicant. Request amendment to Clearwater Redevelopment Plan from Low Density Residential and Medium/High Density Residential Categories to Public/Government Category at R.J. Booth's Sub, Blk 2, Lots 1-6 and Sarah McMullen's Sub, Blk 2, Lots 1-10 less road right-of-way. CRA 00-09-01 ACTION - DENIED - 5:0 ITEM E - DIRECTOR'S ITEMS - None. FlE ap, ITEM F - ADJOURNMENT - 6:28 p.m. mcd10bOO 4 10/17/00 . -. 11/26/1 97 11:37 8135301474 PSTADART PAGE 02 11/26/97 PINELLAS SUNCOAST TRANSIT AUTHORITY DOWNTOWN CLEARWATER PARK STREET TERMINAL INTERMODAL FACILITY PROPOSAL NOVEMBER, 1997 Introduction -In early 1997, PineHas Suncoast Transit Authority (PSTA) staff began an informal search In the downtown Clearwater area for a replacement site for its Park Street Terminal. Built In 1983, the open air ,terminal had become outmoded and could no longer accommodate the number of buses that served the downtown site. In fact, during the am aind pm peak periods, PSTA buses spfIJ out onto adjacent streets Into curbsIde parking spaces that accommodate metered auto parking durIng mid..day. Additionally, the Clearwater Jolley Trolley serves the terminal via a curbside space as there is no room to assign to the trolley at any time during the day. PST A contacted several brokers/owners of sufficiently large parcels that were for sale and very quickly IdentIfied three sites that contained parcels that would accommodate PSTA's desired expansIon. As a courtesy to the City of Clearwater, PSTA also contacted the City's Economic Development Team to inform them of the plan. . The City responded with a proposal which involved the redevelopment of the entire block upon which the Park Street Terminal Is situated, and , would include the Pinenas County Utilities Department surface parking lot to the west of the existing terminal. , After several meetings of the three entities (PSTA, City of Clearwater, , Pinellas County UtfUtles Department) it became apparent that a viable · plan could be developed and that the three agencies could contribute resources to the project and share in the benefits. This could be the first intermodal facility of its type In this region. i This report outlines the proposal to construct a multl..modal transit i facility and parking garage at the block upon which Park Street Terminal sits and identifies details that are known at this time as well as areas where more research is required. , A:nalysis and Summary of Needs - It is apparent that all three agencies would benefit from A r.nnnQlr'!:lthID Dffl"\ri TJ...... '....II.......~_ ~ ~ u_ . __ 1 I { , i ) i i ' ~ I I li : l : ! ., 'i :'{, :1, l ll/J5/1997 11:37 813530~4 . PAGE 03 PSTADART PSTA - The present facility consists of an eight-bay, saw..tooth terminal. It sits upon a .86 acre parcel that Is bounded by Park Street on the north, Myrtle Street on the east and PIerce Street on the south. The Pinellas County UtilitIes (water and sewer) Department owns the remainder of the block to the west, out to South Fort Harrison Avenue. During current peak periOdS PSTA has a need for a total of 11 vehicles forcing 3 buses onto the side streets. In addition, all of the terminal facilities including information booth, restrooms, and driver's room are outgrown and would benefIt from expansion. Citx 01 Clearwater . Clearwater has Identified a need for public parking in the general vicinity. The City will conduct a detailed parking Inventory and analysis In late 1997, and an In-house needs study completed in February 1994 provided a deficit of 400.. 600 spaces in the near term. In addition to the current County surface parking lot, the City would like to provide for merchant and employer parking In this area. Also several churches in the Immediate vicinity have existing and future needs for after hours and weekend parking. The City has efforts underway to bring in new housing and employment into the downtown and a multi.. modal facility will support the City's efforts. Just as Important to the City is the benefit of having PSTA stay In its present location. Government owned property does not generate tax revenues so keeping the County and PSTA in their present location IIprotects" the City from the loss of tax base that a relocation would entail. Pinellas County Utilities Department - Pinellas County owns the balance of the block which is a 1.22 acre parcel containing 105 auto parkIng spaces, a retention pond, and several huge Oak tree clusters. The County has indicated they desire to have sufficient space for future growth, as well as a pedestrian overpass from the first level parking dock. In addition, the County allows an adjacent church to use their lot after hours and weekends and desIres to continue that arrangement. Alternatives - Any evaluation of a project of this magnitude will involve an analysis of alternatives. Four such alternatives were Identified and are discussed below: 2 ! ! ! I 't I ! i ;1. I 1 . ~ ~ 1 'J I I :1 ' .:1 I I I ! 1 11 :j :! I ;1 :1 !I :1 1 i I ,; I i , I I , , 11/25/1:397 I I I I ! i , 11:37 8135301 . PSTA DART PAGE 04 Status Quo .. PST A could continue to operate from the existing facility without alterations. However, as pointed out earlier the various features of the facility are currently lacking and there Is no room for growth. In time, as ridership continues to Increase and headways on key routes are reduced, overcrowding of passengers and buses will exacerbate the Inadequencies 01 the existing facility. Expand at Present Site Without Additional Land - This alternative Is not reasonable because current development does not meet code. Namely there is insufficient green space and stormwater Is not adequately retained on-site. Expansion at the present site would require additional impervious surfaces in the way of paving and foundations or slabs. The site Is too small to allow for vertical expansion with required entrance and exit ramps. Even if sufficient storm water retention could be provided underground or off- site, the space gained (for parking up to approximately four additional buses) would not be sufficient to take current vehicles away from curbside and under roof at the terminal. Expand at Present Site with Additional Land - This alternative would involve PSTA expanding at the present site with the addition of part or all of the remainder of the block on which the existing terminal Is located. In this scenario enough ground space would be acquired so as to allow for the vertical expansion of existing facilities both for buses and for autos. Stormwater retention could be stored on-site or could be transported off-site. The bus facilities could be doubled (i.e., up to 14-16 vehicles served off-street) and the auto parking could be moved to the structure above the bus terminal. The pros for this alternative are that there is no additional land taken off of the tax rolls and the bus terminal function or land use remains in the area where It had been for over 25 years. The cons include additional pedestrian and vehicular activity in an area that is currently somewhat congested during peak periods and the necessity to move the bus terminal and surface auto parking to another location during construction which could last from 1 - 1 % years. In this and in the preceedfng alternative there would be addItional costs Involved In leasing or renting temporary parking and terminal space while construction is underway. 3 ,I I I I i , I . T I J' ! I ,.i, I 1 '..'. 1 t ,I: f 1 J 1 j 11 1:1 1 I i. I I i : : I I , I J ~ j 'I I , 1 I j _____~____ __ _n_____._ __ _ ____ . , I 11/26/1997 11:37 8135301474 PSTA DART PAGE 1115 Relocate to New Site - The last alternative to consider would be to build a new facility at a new location. A new location would have to be sufficiently large in size to a,low to accommodate existing needs in addition to reasonable future growth. The pros of this alternative Include the ability to design a facility from the ground up, unconstrained by existing development as well as the ability to construct a new facility without negatively impacting the current terminal operations. The cons include the real possibility that this would be the most costly alternative since it could require the outright purchase of a sizeable parcel of land. In addition, land use and zoning issues could come Into play since the bus terminal would be a new use to a new parcel, and could present problems to residents or businesses In the immediate vicinity. PSTA would probably lose the opportunity for a joint-use project, since the CIty and County have needs at the present location and these needs would not necessarily be met at an alternate site. Recommendation - The opportunity of involving Pinellas County and the City of Clearwater clearly boosts the expansion of present site with additional land alternative. The following points recap the benefits accrued to each of the three parties: PSTA - Ability to expand terminal in present site to meet current and future needs. Ability to provide multl.modal facilities to benefit other users and generate revenues to help offset costs. City of Clearwater - Ability to provide multi-level parking facility in a prime area at a favorable cost when compared to a stand..alone parking garage. Pinelfas County - Ability to expand number of spaces available for future growth without need to purchase additional land. Proposal Details - PSTA has developed a conceptual plan to meet the current and future needs of the three involved agencies. Site Plan - The preliminary concept would provide for the ground floor to be an enclosed bus terminal with between 14-16 spaces under roof. Along the east side additional spaces can be provided for Jolley Trolley vehicles, taxis, and possibly Intercity buses. In order to enhance the Inter-modal utility of thIs facility, ~ ; : ;' ",f I, i I . ; ! : I' ! -r I : 'i'-! I 'ijll i;j"'\; 1 i ;,' " I 0" "j ,] I ".'1 ! ,1 " 111 1 j .j I j ; a :1 "~' ~ 1 ~ t I : :. i : ; ! 'j I , I ; , : ~ i ',\ I \ 'IJ I.: 1 ' i ,'I ' I 0 I: , 11/26/1997 11: 37 813530. PSTA DART. PAGE 06 PSTA proposes to provide a number of storefronts along South Fort Harrison Avenue to provide for terminal enhancIng services such as a snack bar, news stand, dry cleaner, customer In1ormation booth, check casher, day care facility, offices, and so on. Physically separatIng these two uses (i.e., retail space and terminal space) would be a ramp accessing the upper level parking decks. Floors. Because of the need and desire to provide an open and aIry space for the bus termInal it is recommended that the ground floor terminal area would have a ceiling heIght of 1 a ... 20'. This extra height In the bus area would allow for parking of approximately 26 cars or a mezzanine directly above the retail shops fronting on South Fort Harrison Avenue. As an alternative to the auto parking, leased office space could be provided as well as possibly a community room available for private and public meetings. An office for the parking garage operation could be accommodated either on the ground level or mezzanine level. Above this level would be four full levels of auto parking. Each level would accommodate approximately 131 parking spaces. Pedestrian stairwells would be provided at the northwest and southeast corners of the building and a pair of elevators would be built in the southwest corner. One parking level would be dedicated to the Utilities Department which could accommodate the present spaces (105) and allow for some growth. The upper three floors would provide 393 spaces which compares favorably with a projected need of 400 . 500 spaces in this area. It is recommended that the building be constructed to allow for up to four additional levels of parking for future growth to be constructed a later date. Facilities. The new multimodal terminal would consist of three dIstinct land uses: bus terminal, retail/office space, and the parking structure. PSTA would operate the terminal just as it does the present facility. The Transit Authority would also be the landlord for the retail spaces on the ground floor. This could be handled directly by authority personnel or be contracted through a leasing agent. The Utilities Department would maintain control and responsibility for their dedicated level. Access to that level would have to be restricted in some fashion, so that employee spaces would not be taken up by public use. LastlYI the upper parking levels would be open public parking and it is envisioned that the City of Clearwater would operate these levels as an element to their downtown parking facilities program. 5 '....:.' .'+.....11.. ,.,'.' ~11:ir ::- ;, If it l:j 'I ,1:1 ..,..l..j.. ! 'f 'f " j;l : l:j 1 '1 ~ >, 1 :; , .\ I ' i r .; , ~ . I , I : t Iii ; :1 :j .., , <\ I :t ,'j q i ,: 1 I I I ! I I 1 ,: ., . . 11/26/1997 11:37 8135301474 PST A DART PAGE 07 There are many aspects of the ownership, operation and maintenance of a Jointly-owned and operated facility that will need to be identified and negotiated at a later date. It Is presumed here that the administrators of the project will seek the assistance of their legal departments at such time as these issues are ready to be discussed. Cost Estimates - The preliminary cost estimate was developed by determining the cost for each of the four distInct land uses. For the retail shops and bus terminal total square footage was used. For the parking structure a cost per parking space was utilized (see Chart #1). The cost of the overpass was based upon an estimate of that type of specialty construction. Thus, a cost of $553,740 was determined for the retail shops, $1,514,712 for the bus terminal, $5,764,000 for the parking garage, and $250,000 for the overpass. With a contingency of 10% the total construction cost amounts to $8,890,697. Architectural and e,nglneering fees are estimated at 6% of construction for a dollar value of $533,442. Additional related fees include reimbursable (out-of- pocket) costs of $16,560 required threshold inspection estImated at $20,000 and renderings at $7,500. Construction management costs will provide for a full time manager and secretary at $53,320 and $26,660 respectively, for an estimated 16 month construction period. Overhead costs are figured at a rate of 130%. This construction period could be shortened with the understanding that the construction cost would be increased. This could be determined by including an option of compressed time frame at time of bid. Also, these estimates do not include the cost of parking garage capital equipment (I.e., CCTV, gates) or security equipment. Chart #1 (Area in Square Feet) Ground Level First Level 2-5 level Total % R eta II 10,068 - 10,068 2.6 - Shops Bus 51,785 51 ,785 13.5 - - Terminal Parking 9,272 28,132 284,500 321,904 83.9 Garage II Total 71 ,125 28,132 284,500 383,757 100 +1 11 !I it I! I' Ii : ~ 'j , , I i I )1 '! I ; ~ . _ " " , : 'I i ,i.. ij ,: . '1' ':I! 'I 'I . :l1 I i' i j I J ,if , ' ; j ; :I! :1 II 'ii i! , i: ii :! " . . I 11/~6/1997 11:37 8135301474 PSTA DART : Construction Cost Retail Cost = 10,068 sq. ft. @$55.00 sq. ft. = , Terminal Cost = 51,785 sq. ft. @$29.25 sq. ft. - Garage Cost = 524 spaces @ 11 ,OOO/space = Pedestrian Overpass I I Contingency (10%) PAGE 08 $ 553,740 $1,514,712 $5,7Q4..0DO ( ~"" ~~~.'-~~ $8,082,452 + $ 808,245 to L' .i 1-:; . Tc)- -J h(L~l-(1 Su btotal 1 $8,890,697 I i I j 1 , Architectural/Engineering (6%) Reimbursable Costs Tihreshold Inspection Renderings $533,442 $ 16,560 $ 20,000 $ 7,500 Subtotal 2 $577,502 Construction Management (16 month contract} Manager ($40,000 yr) $ 53,320 Secretary ($20,000 yr) $ 26!660 Overhead (1.3 X) $ 103,974 Grand Total $9,652,153 J 'il . .,i :i "i,l. ' : ;~, : t i " :r "./ J!,j : :~ "-:J .i:,l T il ;J il " l,i 'llj l'~ ,q .!. I :.i 1.1, Subtotal 3 $ 183,954 Financing. Prellminary discussions amongst the representatives of the three agencies, subject to policy board review and approval, suggest construction funding could be accomplished via a three..way split. PSTA would apply for intermodal funds In the amount of $3 mlJllon (an initial notice of application has already been submitted) to the Florida Department of Transportation (FOOT). The remainder would be split between the City of Clearwater and PSTA. As mentioned earlier, the Plnellas County Utilities Department would deed the surface parking lot as their contribution to the overall project. Operating cost projections are being prepared and will be available for review in the near future. Additional grants will be pursued also for additional funding. I : .-j ; : Summary.. The development of a multlmodal terminal on the site of the present Park Street Terminal presents unique and exciting possibilities for PST A to greatly improve Its services to present users, future users, and the general public. Coupled with the prospect of partnering this 11/26/1997 11:37 n :1 if Ii :1 813530'4 . PSTADART PAGE 09 p'roject with Florida DOT, City of Clearwater, and Pinellas County Utilities Department makes the project much more viable. Staff requests approval of the concept and authorization to proceed with the necessary planning and coordination in order to finalize a complete proposal package. I , I ~'7 '..' ..'.. i.. 'i . : r' I. :..:..1..'. '. I 1'1 i 1:1 " ! ~ ; I i I : I L i ., i it 'j ! ,1 , ; .-1 . j ;.( ! ! J ---. ...,: .',... j_".. '..'--a:...:....;.~;;...., ".11 ",~ ......,....' ., ~.., ... -. ." .. -. - .. :_-- ~! 11/~/1l97 11: 37 8135301474 PSTA DART PAGE 10 SOUTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE j j 1 I j I ~I.M I i I i i ! JI I I , I 1 ! I I 9 I ! I ql I ; , ! , I ., . , I I . II . I , , :;l .l,! ,:F:!Fj , ilr" 'I i .. ijl:Jil i tE'jl .'.::' .:. If -t ., ;' ., .i.J;': ;.',1 ! !1"j ;f,;1 I "1... '.' 'j '1J 1 '1 j '!, .' "I.':~ :'1', '; "I ' ii; l~ ~'~ !.'.i[ ?II l! ,11" il '! ! : ii Ji '.~ 'I , r;! : II 11 , , . it .,(1 0.1 'i " ,.it " ':J ;1 ;! I II: JlId6) : l,j I ,_: I j -t ; ! ! : 8135301474 , ;i 'I ...il :;! ;! I ; , , J I ' I ! I I I . I I I 1 ( r i i I ' I I i I I I i i I o o 0 . PSTA DMT CllItIN'ID __.- :I: l\ ;; . ~-- I~I . . i~ Jill q~1 f- ill I i r'i~ I~i =: fi!-) o 00 I ~ I J PAGE 11 I I i I ! i I i I , I 1 ! : I I ' 19 I It II l~ , g I ' l11 1 ! , I I ! o I I I I i I II I I I j I I : , I I I i i I i I , . i; I: i; .1 ! i ! ! I' Ii 1 :'. .-f \ I '; , I :~ ;~' 1:,); , it t [J :i'I"'1 ill il 1,1 : i,IIIFf "i I, '.1' ! I",: I ; j~ ;i 'II , .. H~ Ii f: I is iI",j I , 'l~ ;1.. j ~- q,: ;l-jj I ":1' ",' ~.1~ ~!! i :r;i i " '.\ 1 . :1i '[. ; <l;'l! ~ j l' . i , -------- -.------------.. ---...- __.__.____ -------. --..---_.___ _________..____n___:.--.-~:.-'-~:------- ____.____.._nn.___ ;i,w ,;1J " ,\ 1 ij j, !; , '. ;;'!f "ij ]'i, !:! , I' a '! ,,,I 'I i 11:37 8135301474 I: n ~ II . i I I I I I i I I I ! I I i I i I I I ; I I , i ; i i o o 0 :II: :I; " Ii: PSTA DART jlll lC ~ 8 I ~ ~lill f- IG=: Ii I~, ill 115 o 00 PAGE 12 I I I I I I i . J I " , I I I . I I . II I I I I . I i i , I , I I , ! o .. . : 1 , ;1 I 'j" , . :1 ..,i ;f ;i;.1 jl::j !~ :j"l.:: ;.1' jf :; j' I" i " ".'.' ; I; !!~ ]: " :,] I' lIt '.' '." Ii! ~ t~,!. q . iul'; ;,".l~ i.".l " ,} ,!~ ;1 iF '( : r I , I i -J : l' ~ -1. -,: j. '" ~ ~ : i , 'j 1- :,' :t ; :1 ! i i. . . '>'. ;''';'!I J ,,~ - t ., s .:J -.. ;~ ';;~";. :'i.~~ ~~~: :'1 .:-:. ~i'!j :.l:[ ;,c. :9 ~1 (:1: II: ~).~ ~ ,'.' if (!';..~ ~;~ ::.: ,.-,~ ~'; . . y. ~ ,.< " .",,' " ;.--: ;~ r",<;t ~l~:~ ...~>w.~ I ;?: _,~ )~.' e ~(.>':~:(,,ru.~ i.'" !? .~ IP' .;h ~ ~ ',: ~:.i rr~ .". ~~ ~~~'C~rt" ;., \'.. f) ~, /1 ~. ,. ~'jf; f.;,i1I.~ Ill,:, ~ l".;;~ ',g, ',~ fi\ ~,}' ir!!I' it Of: 1&.._" '"' 'll @ v . . t-:f~' ~ " ~g i'i .:lh' i.~f ~ s:-; ~ ~"~ ~~. to ~':~:( ~ . , !;I 1", I I , ".' "ff iJ. '~i:~ .' ,1 ~ '~;'.'..' \,tt r. ~."., fl' ,<,. ;i. 1,....J6l. '. .111; f0'~~~ .. . ~ iI .. . <,'!..1 ~ . "rt~1 I ,,;. ~ 'ij; ~~ , ,~ ~,,\::' ~" "' .,t;, " !t'iFr: ~ Q ~ ~ 1 ~ 1 's- ~~ , ~, ~ . fr ~ f D I '1" ,;. t. ~'{, ~'l:; ~ ~-~ ~ ,,~ ~'" .,,p.a..'., l,.; '. J' ''f:' .,< ~; ~ 5:ii;,' ~~:~~~.,~ ~ :'",! :.~; <)I ~~ '.1' '" .~. , iff'J.," !~ " T .~ y' .1-, .I.l I(;:;j ~" ~~ :e,~ ;i:~ 'T2~ ~ ,~ ~ :~~ ~1.. ,-:;' ;'~'i · ~,J 'l '" ~ :;; l!' "" "\',~ t~- ~~ ,~ l' d ~~/ flr .~ ;, j "it df ' If A~ nl'" i: ~~ ,-:~ ! ,~;~ ~~'f! i~ ~, ~~;, ~1?-~~'i ~, ~~ ~~ Ii1 ;k:'~ ~ ~ " ~ "b ~'~ ~ ~, ~':j: - ~~:'lJlM .....-.... - -....-... ~ ~~ ~ r~~ ~~ ;'.; ~;~ ,. 1; \, "" ~~ 1< ~~ ~~ 'I :'1/ ~ ~~ ~: l~ -;~ !!": ~';i: ":. )';; '," -." .~ if ~ ~,f, J~ ~t~ ~:c ':;~, w.': a, I'!i .';($i ~ ';~ ~.;;. ~l; g ~;.;; ~l ~~ ~ ,j) :}; '"j. ~1.~ *,1:: {'~ " ~ :i'f.. t"?f, ,,; ~~~ t~ ;1'; ~ f,;, ~g~ 'l< ~:,. .,)~~~.: ":1 ;~'il ",';'" Wj~ :~~. ~i 'e;.'1 ;~i; ~ ?,:! ~ i~ f~ ~ "~J;, :'i'S~ G~ ,,<, ~:1 ~.l1 ~1 .J'/. 2; '''"' ~,~~ ;..~ ,~ ~J~ ~ ~~ .~ iff It '~j r~ :',: ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ tf;' :.'~ lt1 (J:- ?i ~, (.:.; .~~ '" ;.--:: :~ :;;:~ i~ ;}ii "!;: ~ ,';\ ;.r~1..~ ii!~ :)j; ~ '\.. ~fJ ~ ~ <", ",' .lLJ.. ~-~; oM. .11]'" Illl ~ ,;oz, t."::1j ::' ..' ~~ li"~l:S ~l ~~ :vii ~: '" "., ~ ~)f' ~ 'il: <(t ~c Pi .~~') aii, '.r;p ~ " "~ rr,; ~" ;7;; ~// ~~ ,;~~ ..., :...\' :~ '& ~:;:: ~i~, m ';;\ ~ r<:: ~: :.'.~ ,. ~~ .;-~ ~ :%;. x~ ~~!i ~. .~ ::_~ !W if t1t ~ I.~ ~ ;~~ "', ~;.-~ ...~ 4z .' ';'i' ~r $. ~\~ '5;{.,) ~~,: ~,~~ ~-;,. '1" <iil .7. ~i: ','; ~(~ l1~ :ff; ~A ~~.,'" \i~' 5,:, --:z,..,.;~:'.';),..,r......... ~;; ~~ ,':;: w; l'i! ~1! ~;;: ,ft; ~~: I.: ~t; ~ ;;~: ~ ~;:; ,!:I ,;: "f.,p:li~~'@ ,;{; ~,{ ;~ !".... qh ~ 1:1:'- :~( ? iili f.~ ?~. ~~ ~t <;.~-:: 0, 't" foI:y.-, ~$~:! ;;,{.;.;. ~J -;:;.;;. ~t.-.;; ~ .' ,~ ;i: ~ 4 ~,-i.: ;'1:; ~~ 'ol-. ~~~; :~ ~g!, g 4 , ';"'1 ~:?i ~ ''!.f ff,~ ~j ,~, :1i.~ tk'; ..~)'..... 'ff. ~(. " '--i~ ;.1;.' e0 ,f,' ',:, ~~ '.:.'".',- if.,1 III .:,~' ;r( ,1\ \~.i': ~) ~(J.: 'i!.' 4j~ !;,,~ v~~; -~ :.~ , f ';;:(t';. ~ H -,.,'Z M. -~~. ,:;. ;'C if: ~;, ?<. ~:; ~. ~;;:; lJff;!f ~ c );l';,:-,"~:~ ~ . . Hardin, Cyndi From: Sent: To: Subject: Smith, Diane Wednesday, November 22,20001 :24 PM Keller, Bob; Hardin, Cyndi; Stone, Ralph; Quillen, Michael; Kronschnabl, Jeff PSTA In reviewing the language for the federal dollars awarded to Clearwater, Florida - multimodal facility - $2,500,000. It states that it shall be available for replacement, rehabilitation and purchase of buses and related equipment and the construction of bus-related facilities. There does not appear to be any restrictions that it needs to be spent in Clearwater on a multi-modal facility. Additionally, per the facsimile Alan Zimmet sent PSTA received a categorical exclusion from doing an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Gill property. The exemption they fell under item 10 of the Federal Register rules. Construction of bus transfer facility when located in a commercial area or other high activity center in which there is adequate street capacity for projected bus traffic. I do not know if we can challenge the exemption. The Gill property is not in a zoned Commercial area but there is commercial around it. I do not know how they define a high activity center. I assume the Federal Transit Administration did grant the EIS exemption based on what PSTA submitted. If you want me to pursue this further I can. 1 . /r#6Wmh7 tal) ~1A- ~.~/o~.' /J;JP/tI#d~~t~~a~ ~~bb g-;ZZ 7- ~ - ~wblt1Ct&4~ (?) j ~~ i ~ ~7'~ ("7) I JiMt - 16 pttt?Iil(&Ie/?n< (f/&{);!5J Ie) t>>? -cv/1fl: 07/e- . -W CP;t? -- Jj;JUtY:/ /d?l~ I~ , 1l1tJ/& -h~ /JV~ c:5){ .fU p?Mt: /(J{;}u~;j}y I -~ ~~41PI~/f . 0~ - :PI:;. I~~i:e /lmu O)))#MC ~-liJIIIJf 1:Joc- ~ U/j;t/~ -- - ;zqtJA?U/O/ta?tYl~(:~?mfdFJ2;~r~~~) -- ~ kJftC/D m/U#t~ I JJCM?~/hJM;U~ . tlflf ~7~~ ~b7~~ ~ /I~//h<<e% ~ aca4a'/J/n ,4 ~;~--=t ~~/P/C: tlV,J!V~/Ia?I3; ~~/>>- #itjj/162 V ~~ ;01t;P~j/P/~/zmJJOJ1~ /11; '11 . . /! Ait:J/4 talo th J1I~jfl( -1!opr~ - ff ~ /};</(:Wrl/me . ~ 0J1 ffW-- f7t:lt1vov~1tan -I /P;V ~/!fr , ~cf7.I? IJ /?/tZh /I&u~~~ . Utt#;/JJ.15 /loob/~j7f -IOJ ~~~ . th1Ib/tJZL~ /hdur- &lIUl&~ -C/;m/J~/7} . .m~'laml/Jat~~~ M~ IJ~~I/m/ -~~ .. 4-U/j; ~/7W--- ~p~~~ Uu,ffr;"tdltllltl ~~b~lIs-~fr~ , -.~ f/~/Jtr//? --,/n/~/o~. -tl//d~J2:'/ I- ~p~;t7 fl;r jEr~/;e avr /7~!r ~ra'M In~ ~ 11./;;1::/ A7 AnH/cr ~~ a/~~ ~~~ -~ ~~~.fi;7-'#?h~ . ... frJJe t:b /JO t::l>~/#h~ . /?Z. &;T,l/-' IVJJJ en ///!j- ~/o .h?Z~C/c- q}p~. . ~ ~. Jtar ./~CllbJ11i/ tu/~~ ~ t/n~~ ~ Ii1/W aLl? ~~~~a//~//6--- &~~?I/{fZ;?/k/ 4~7r~--/J1~&~ c:za~ tn- ;/' / t:rl/'-- PI . . . , 0/Yl}m~b- - ?JlMf/Jd!;,l, 11 n~---/JJ~at ~JJ/}JU 1Iuit ~ ~Jdj; ~~~. ~~d.fP J:It9. - d/lln ~j/. ~~ -d#nd/l. ~ ~H ~/O ;I~antl/t(JYd/Jm .-~tlJ&-/2.U/-~/G ~~ i5/tft/X Jt1/JU/cPm:r/?07t ~~~ /&Pic JrJY at:Ii/~aIP~ /&ca~ . . /!II~ -7 1/l4d1~- ~1J7tM/;tL qph l1l<-- jo &tJu Uf./o/ tI t1' ~ .11Jtt4 - ~ tJIcL;7Jtl)P~ IW ~1UId!fg ~- lit ~ LAp?/, iJJz )'Zt:)I- ~$/b&.. &fd- ~ My. Im;7~bU ~ /WI<- 10?J70. 1/ / tJ:1,jldz m(}h/;/ an/1jjW'-- tJt2/r /J7tf ,Iv /mt ./~ '5/0 . tt ..t:.~ IJJtr. 1'1 ~tQ:o f~t7~ 11~ het t:aI./;;qp/J/. ~ 6-; tat /tW/ICIIMIo tJMJ1M!Y . -~ :~ fl&ut!L 11/76 tp/71/$t 6'~ ~ =1J!!lf7tn1 1J}(}l1lJ4'1r ~() $. ~$niC.l~~ ~!t tJ1;:/vIfMJ1 Jot!) ~b/1u ~ 1q,. . ~~ IUlhpa?u" ac~ ~~ V~q~ ~~~~~- . A (f ~ It> &U~ mawrJ-. /~ o;u" ~?~-Ave~/au-~ rfI~ ~~ -a/lQ/J'P~!I-A>~~6' t/;t#/Iffi: ~/M.. b/lfP1r-~ '11Pt1 ~j?~ J'J/6 1/.1Ja::I~ O~/~ ~ Ct ~ Wtttzr ~t6 ~ /}/1~1r~U:JJU ~ du-. #!ftL tI1fJ ~ ICh #i au:a ?if /I?;f-? ~~~ au de /4j/ve dk /lltfPd-4:z0 / . . ,LO.//--2- I -Ct?t5 *~~ ~ ...tuttI~fit>>u~~~h hvt 7fK61v-- h f!lt/:tr uplv /llZ3 I"II~/ UJr -f Wt3 /-r2.~/. 'mlxa) ~;~2::M-nlld ~ - --1- . - . -411--2 tJm -4HJHa/rnlh?h~~~~ ZtmlltL/ --:<< ~/~qJe,hc .,.{4!J/~ O/fL /7(f}b ?loltJlb7diUd'- Ie /;:b~ / JJnUY'14#W0VjH@llfh/P<<;tpk) ~/ltd; ~/I-j;,~ f3m~~ PO ~ M7!ff /24' ~II ffk f~~~ ~~1i7~ )UJ~~ ~rr. ~tVl1Uj~ -#/h/uJ 9VU/~ /JU/!/J7ntllbarJ1J/J.~ ~/~~ ~ /I#u/~ . ao $j/t1/57 ~-~J3;~~7# tft,liY". .. )~ ~/ ftj/?;e-/-tf13 ~Iwtd B ~ ma1t/m#/P-.ac~ ~d ~U-~HtJ,P~p~ .. ~!!P~ k~ ~M7t<-?~~ ~-~~~ ., Jww~ rOH ~~/);d . /~ b2tab m~ /U72v - fPad..,-I-fJ~ ~ ~ ~g ~JLR-p~/~ . ~,. 177&71Y ft;y ~~r ~/taJ ~tk: ~/W mt~ . . !J 1/1--7 / /~. .. ~~.-/~ dfllJS 30Jtf2L ~/J?n1 ~~ kJ~ ~ /mJ;7~~~c ~ tu&j~ jJ~tJmt o?J<<Pt>>7-,t c1}JaJJ~ ~J /Jt#~ ;to /?~Z;Y/??&r<: ~ ~~ - ~t:W- -~ ~tlt1Z4-I-~/:>. ~/l~ J-~ (ti/7~a4~) tdtj t#7/n OM ;: - /7/~jz;JhZJ~ IJJtiU #Z7/f t7~!l d~ ~1&~/Jp ~M fu;z,v ):?n/J1~1 ~/)H~ ~/176 /1 ~ etJJ7~/luG -87) /7UJZe CJP/f /1;v -mh~ 7iu~ ~ftbtJu/ <1} dcw>>~- I "d~ )'&6y /UJu~ tJ(;JJ?~J< bJ~/;L ~'u -m ~ -7 ~~'~ /6'3d~ -I-CJo tor - ~ac int67'JjJ/& C4INJt.~ ~/I~~lht~~ MtthP~.~~~/bYZ~~ :ll&d.. ~ ~m -- ~/zb <fJJ;t51#h (ft{)IY/~J>oIJ ~- Ubr ~t1?l-ffih~ _e.A\A jU)//d, ~/?a. atUL ~~~~./ . . . /0)/1-- f .h$; -~~#l/'1~~ _/ J~ /Jd::11!TJ7?/k;~<7h~t?M Af:!'t11J ~~ uJr~/~.~/>>rYamlJ?:?f J!J:Uaf- ~7 (})jt/)a~ /~ · ~d+ /l-ipJ/~/1/ ~fP. '1fJ#IIJ~p~tf ak. ~~~ . 1W~j;'h /i;r~ 57;/(:;f;Y ~d~. U/k!lz:uL~) 5170~~~7P . t#I/-JuFtfU/~~j?t M-<J~/7N.3r~ . ~aa:..J7kjby~~ cfrP~~~P/U" ~~Jz IJn~ ~/7th~~p}w ~/ttm k40~mt:?'-,L'~ JOZl?T- iJ7/& @-fDt&f (!/JI It. J /1 ~~ !J#t~/mJk:pm~- {~ n4 - Z-'j Iuft/~ tje%k~. . ~ /t??"?/~ /Jr~~ ~jJtY Mr~ . . LO,jf-- · / - 2- thltjt/?I- j7P)JJ/s - tg ~c:>>7 ;1; ~ ~4:2~/U~ ~ (;;p7~u//1 a/bMi:/!e, F~J{)I/~~Mmk U~ .~ ~P&~ ?l/;pj//~/p~ 0Wr~~? ~ .. /!t t:/L. Z;atJtlJ1 -- ~h:.tet6 );;!jjjj ~ ~ ~ /a~J tV'- H?/;j)~ /)L / /Nt:/#/e ~ PJ7ee mt7'~ ." ~~ //fPtb f?>>J7J~17j<:? ~~~~ ~~C/~ ~Jl:-'/jz:M -,h ~/;l:d-jO/J~44' .. ~~g~~~4!iJat CJ1 iPcte- ~ ft/dI~~/~h%)otf/r~ ~Jtd; . rtJl/U&:1IIi~ t4~-~;d(. -- ~- . . ~1-- ~ , 1/1} tJM, t4i~~ ~ -dm~~_ //#~~-~~~ ~t/&nMtpv-/Np~ tP~.a rtlit<< rf ~ . OJ~ _ _ ftlth. ~h ~jP.&g/:?)~~-- -IJ~U7/O t7mt6~ ~-/ai~Iv~~- /A/Ab{;f)/L ~ tJbl/uw~ CJ~UB~-/l/~~ . -!/J~~#----~~&J/c~MA~~ I , U:;;eJi;y~ ~k ~/>>:fl. /i>>- ~ OjaffTk /UJ/-~~ p}t-J- ~ hta mV/II;--m~aI ~/~ ~. /lvniL - 'tx;t!JJy A/a:-e.e/uJt~;:i:Jn.~ )7kJWd maw /1~9 trtd~ Hj ~~ / 00 tJfJ/~ tf)rt:rm ~ . j~ ~~/5 @ O/w4c4~ . )7ol?/2 r'~ . pi~ee@~lf7: ~ . . 11'11- ~Juv - rntiii : ~x/ h7 . JC/}1tj~~/JnffV!d. ~ ' #- / /It. Iz; ~4. ~ fn/:6 f!t;u/lJ;aIJ1a ~~~- ~u~5)J~ho/J1h ~ au bt/LuhM ~/7U::?/Mhh ~'t~vlY'jl!?t~ tM lbtt.i ~ fJ/tJ/tL Omc, Wj~ j:r ~//t7a/~y. 1/A)~ Iv Ap/thG -/]tJ ~!7C4ZWJt ~J;M ~ 1~/8 Otm~ 87~ I j~~~/{) ~n:d~ i. . l-&:fJmple. 1tq.ttU;r-/lVJ- ./}fWJ1Plf}WJ~r/VIt?1?G f~J?~ t/}J/~/~~~ ~ Cavn~ -/?atttr:L 8J-. ~~ dUill1 (}/Zm ~ #I?d ~ 8j:J~!f()0{J()U ~ ~m(J}J1~ J{)()~ ~~ ~//jg&-a~.~~ (J,/!;f ~~ ~ t:h;fff /6 ~jl~ . . ~ft;;:M~~/JWu.~ . ~/M6 ~ht1l:7 5~ nwzeM/jy/In19~.Iam/~ l!!~lUWiU~ M'p/tfPCt /?Jv~Q ~F/m.. I /'~t:/t/ ~j///C- ;71~. --I ~cht?/;p (Cffll ~ 2 tJ/P;~ ?!JJJ&- ~!h~ . /:JoJ1J /2 j9tt,(;IIGljftiWJiz, IhC//1/litb ff:::L:r ~~ 41 /UJ ~?j/~ _ . ~dhvb (O#~k/t1lt"u7- J1#t7I /1J IWIt c::pC ~ ~~ ~ay- -/JH~'3J ~ !/iJ() j//f (}fwd ~. . . WJtcL-Il<<.a~I!~~ -k4n/W61;Y~ 1/1/1/)17 /!/~~.p~ --~/?)?W( :?dtto,~6r /~/'!-7Ia:tto-~ &/1at ~ ~/)fI/}fj)f-~ ~ ~ . ., adadif/WP~q~d ~~ h~yMu . . /0.;1--- .4;/~jIe - ~/l/Pn ~h ~~ . /1J //J~~. I ~tlJ?1 # --- ftl~ _ ~~~~~~~~~#Y) Ji::fw /u?f/ ~~ &t 4/Av ~~/nue /t)~ d/?~ .JJuM--~UiJft_h~ ~~~ ho;mk7JC~ ~~ ~/lJ -. - m~~~ ~ ~~;11. //J;k/~<</~Jm~. NUl tbY~J0~fJ~~~~20 i :. . , \\ ngin_ ~ s ~. <::.:l ~ C6 ~ ~ /) t ~ ~ ' r vd ~ g". ~ I ~ \) ~ ~ 0 0 ~ i 0 g _t:l Y'l ;:; ~ ~ ,~ ~ DOUGLAS BETTY LANE MILWAUKEE AVE. ~ r- )> " HIGHWAY '" .s '" AVE, AVE. V' HIGHLAND ::;: PATRICIA AVE, A ;0 0 Vl LAKE DR, c c z z Vl 0 C CD '" z Vli ~ -l CJ Vl '" C -l -lC >- ':;; !i! ;;; KEENE RD, KEENE RD z -< < ;0 c 0 ;;; 0 ;0 ;:: VlCJ LO CD 0 -l~O '" >- Z -l ;0 -< 0 -< 0 CD C ;u ;0 r- r- < '" 0 0 ::;: ::u BELCHER RD BELCHER RD c::> BELCHER RD ,.., Z -l ,.., RD, C>0 ~ '" ~ HAMPTON <::.:l ~ o ::u ,.., ::;: Vl -l U> "' o " o Z -l c z ~ ~ Ln -l ,.., Vl ;0 ;0 CJ McMULLEN BOOTH RD. (6)..'19 "3QOI<,>a "3 1 ~ '.>'l'.'-'-..'.". III Vl ::0 ~ ~ ".. .. -.. ..- ?f;J /l~ / j); Ie tUj P/JflJ ~ A1Jun~j1w P5~~ t.qoa I... ~ NORTH 1--200' Aerial Map Site J !' - ..:..... CITY OF CLEARWATER. FLORIDA PUBIJC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING ~ NORTH Aerial Map Site 2 PUBIJC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING ~ NORTH Aerial Map i PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING ~ NORTH Aerial Map -"- .-; PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING w ( 'Ys\\\ - C~f1 CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CITY COMMISSION THURSDA Y, JANUARY 18,2001 (at 6:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard) 'li.t Ita ud" Pursuant to Section 163.346, Florida Statutes (1997), the City Commission of the City of Clearwater, Florida as the governing body of the City of Clearwater, Florida does hereby give notice to each taxing authority, as that term is defined in Section 163.340(2), Florida Statutes (Supp.1998) of its intention to consider an amendment to the community redevelopment plan for the community redevelopment area located in the downtown area of the City of Clearwater (the Downtown Redevelopment Plan) as described in Resolution No. 95-65 adopted by the City Commission on August 17, 1995. The revised community redevelopment plan to be considered by the City Commission would change the adopted Low Density and Medium! High Residential Categories to Public/Government Category for property located at 100 North Greenwood Avenue to allow the construction of a bus terminal by the Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority (PST A). The property is approximately 3.4 acres in size. The City Commission will consider Resolution 01-02 immediately following the public hearing held by the City Commission in the Commission Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Avenue, Clearwater, Florida. The proposed modifications to the community redevelopment plan to be considered by the City Commission at the public hearing are available for inspection at the Planning Department, Municipal Services Building, 100 South Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, Florida. Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearings or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Department Director or City Clerk prior to the hearings. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC/ AAE City Clerk City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS A V AILABLE IN THE CITY CLERK DEPT. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL THE CITY CLERK DEPT WITH THEIR REQUEST AT (727) 562-4090. . . Hardin, Cyndi From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Hardin, Cyndi Friday, December 08, 2000 3:47 PM Goudeau, Cyndie Stone, Ralph; Dougall-Sides, Leslie; Ruscher, Amy; Harriger, Sandy Ads for the PST A amendment At your office's request, I have prepared draft ads for the PSTA item. The ad is for the City Commission consideration of the amendment to the redevelopment plan and should be scheduled for the January meeting (whenever it occurs.). I have prepared two ads- the first one (ignore the title-it really is for the CC not the CRA) is the notice of the public hearing. The second ad is the notice to the taxing authority. Please note on the first ad for the public hearing that I did not fill in all of the standard notice info since I assumed that you all have that on a form that can be easily added to the customized info for the PST A. I suggest the Jan. 18 or whatever date it is moved to as the public hearing date. The CRA has already continued their consideration of this item (as a recommendation only) to Jan 16. Leslie-any suggestions on the ad are welcome-I used the samples sent by Susan Chase which were for the amendment Planning did last summer for the land around the town pond. I hope the Florida Statutes citations are still correct. Please let me know of any changes. My last day in the office will be Tuesday, December 19 and I will not return until Jan 9- so I am trying to get this done in advance. Thanks. u[J u[J CRA ad for PSTA amendment Jan ... CC ad to taxing authority re P.., 1 . . NOTICE TO TAXING AUTHORITY Pursuant to Section 163.346, Florida Statutes (1997), the City Commission ofthe City of Clearwater, Florida as the governing body of the City of Clearwater, Florida does hereby give notice to each taxing authority, as that term is defined in Section 163.340(2), Florida Statutes (Supp.1998) of its intention to consider an amendment to the community redevelopment plan for the community redevelopment area located in the downtown area of the City of Clearwater (the Downtown Redevelopment Plan) as described in Resolution No. 95-65 adopted by the City Commission on August 17, 1995. The revised community redevelopment plan to be considered by the City Commission would change the adopted Low Density and Medium! High Residential Categories to Public/Government Category for property located at 100 North Greenwood Avenue. The City Commission will consider this request to amend its Downtown Redevelopment Plan immediately following a public hearing to be held on Thursday, January 18, 2001, beginning at 6:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as possible, in City Commission Chambers, at City Hall, 112 South Osceola Avenue, Clearwater, Florida. The proposed modification to the community redevelopment plan to be considered by the City Commission at the public hearing is available for inspection at the Planning Department, Municipal Services Building, 100 South Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, Florida. . . CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CITY COMMISSION THURSDAY, JANUARY 18,2001 (at 6:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard) A public hearing will be held by the City of Clearwater, Florida, in the City Commission Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Avenue, Clearwater, Florida to consider the request of the Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority to amend the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan. The Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority requests an amendment to the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan to change the land use category from Low Density and Medium! High Residential Density Categories to Public Government Category for property located at 100 North Greenwood Avenue. The property is approximately 3.4 acres in size. (BALANCE OF AD IS CITY'S STANDARD AD WORDING) · · ~'-[-""rml\:j )J r'.! ~ (tr; "m ~ :1 L:) :",..=-,_'::.~ J:L.J~~1__;/ n II 11 '!i I ! i : 1 ZIMMET, UNICE, SALZMAN & FELD~t.~q.v 2 1 2021 i.:_l;"',; Two Prestige Place ,_ l i 2650 McCormick Drive, Suite 100 PlANNING If, !)f:'Vt:(~hAt':T GV,~~1 Cl t Fl'ct 33759 CITY Ol- Cl f-, (;\.\,rp::R ""'" earwa er, on a --:;';-' '.... ELITA D. COBBS DONNA J. FELDMAN JOSEPH H. GRAVES ROBERT E. HEYMAN BRET T. JARDINE ANDREW J. SALZMAN T.R. UNICE, JR. NICOLE E. WEISS ALAN S. ZIMMET Telephone: (727)723-3772 Facsimile: (727)723-1421 Website: www.zustlaw.com November 17, 2000 Via Facsimile - 562-4576 Cyndi Hardin City of Clearwater 112 S. Osceola Avenue Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 Re: PST A Site Dear Cyndi: This is in response to your e-mail of November 15, 2000 requesting the criteria for site selection for the new PST A terminal in downtown Clearwater. It is not feasible to provide an all- encompassing list ofthe criteria necessary for the site for this terminal, especially in light ofthe fact that Federal Regulations govern PST A's selection ofa site and construction ofa terminal. With that understanding, I would provide you the following criteria: 1. A minimum of two acres, rectangular or square in shape. 2. In downtown Clearwater. 3. Good road access available on two sides and preferably, three sides of the property. 4. Located within two blocks of a major arterial road. 5. The site needs to be relatively clean from an environmental standpoint. It also needs to meet the approval of the Federal government with regard to on-site environmental issues as well as what the Federal government refers to as the environmental impacts on the surrounding 00007623.WPD . . neighborhood. I am enclosing a copy of a portion ofthe applicable federal regulations under which PST A received what is called a categorical exclusion for the environmental impacts on the neighboring properties for the Laura Street site. 6. The site needs to require minimal site clearing and/or demolition. 7. The site does not present serious drainage issues. 8. Sufficient infrastructure (water, sewer, public utilities) are available. Under the federal regulations, the property must be purchased in a voluntary purchase and cannot be obtained through PSTA's condemnation powers. I trust this provides you with the general guidelines and criteria with regard to a selection of a site for the PST A terminal and is sufficient to assist the City staff in pursuing the direction ofthe City Commission. If you need any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely yours, ZIMMET, UNICE, SALZMAN & FELDMAN, P.A. ASZ/jas Enclosures cc: Ralph Stone Pam Akin, Esq. Roger C. Sweeney /'. r j/'hJ ~~tJt:et I } I . I / i I V 00007623.WPD . . ~t.1. Federal Register / Vol. 52, No. 157 / Friday, August 28, 19B7 / Rules and Regulations .......... .,r (4) Approvals or acceptances of public involvement/public hearing procedures prior to the publication date of this regulation remain valid. (i) Applicants for capital assistance in the UMT A program achieve public participation on proposed projects by holding public hearings and seeking input from the public through the scoping process for environmental documents. For projects requiring EISs, a public hearing will be held during the circulation period of the draft EIS. For all other projects, an opportunity for public hearings will be afforded with adequate prior notice pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 1602(d), 1604(i), 1607a(f) and 1807a-1(d), and such hearings will be held when anyone with a significant social, economic, or environmental interest in the matter requests it. Any hearing on the action must be coordinated with the NEPA process to the fullest extent possible. (j) Information on the U~1TA environmental process may be obtained from: Director, Office of Planning Assistance, Urban Mass Transportation Administration, Washington. DC 20590. Information on the FHW A environmental process may be obtained from: Director, Office of Environmental Policy, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC 20590. ~ 771.113 Timing of Administration activities. (a) The Administration in cooperation with the applicant will perform the work necessary to complete a FONSI or an EIS and comply with other related environmental laws and regulations to the maximum extent possible during the NEPA process. This work includes environmental studies, related engineering studies, agency coordination and public involvement. However, final design activities, property acquisition (with the exception of hardship and protective buying, as defined in ~ 771.117(d)), purchase of construction materials or rolling stock, or project construction shall not proceed until the following have been completed: (1)(i) The action has been classified as a categorical exclusion (CE). or (ii) A FONSI has been approved, or (iii) A final EIS has been approved and available for the prescribed period of time and a record of decision has been signed; (2) For actions proposed for FHW A funding, the FHW A Division Administrator has received and accepted the certifications and any required public hearing transcripts required by 23 U.S.C. 128; (3) For activities proposed for FHW A funding. the programming requirements of 23 CFR Part 450, Subpart B. 2nd 23 CFR Part 630, Subpart A, have been met. (b) For FHW A. the completion of the requirements set forh in paragraph (a)(1) and (a)(2) of this section is considered acceptance of the general project location and concepts described in the environmental document unless otherwise specified by the approving official. However, such approval does not commit the Administration to approve any future grant request of fund the preferred alternative. (e) Letters of Intent issued under the authority of section 3(a)(4) of the UMT Act are used by UMTA to indicate an intention to obligate future funds for multi-year capital transit projects. Letters of Intent will not be issued by UMTA until the NEPA process is completed. ~ 771.115 Classes of actions There are three classes of actions which prescribe the level of documentation required in the NEPA process. (a) Class I (EISs). Actions that significantly affect the environment require an EIS (40 CFR 1508.27). The following are examples of actions that normally required an EIS: (1) A new controlled access freeway. (2) A highway project of four or more lanes on a new location. (3) New construction or extension of fixed rail transit facilities (e.g., rapid rail. light rail, commuter rail, automated guideway transit). (4) New construction or extension of a separate roadway for buses or high occupancy vehicles not located within an existing highway facility. (b) Class II (CEs). Actions that do not individually or cumulative have a significant environmental effect are excluded from the requirement to prepare an EA or EIS. A specific Iistof CEs normally not requiring NEPA documentation is set forth in ~ 771.117(c). When appropriately documented, additional projects may also qualify as CEs pursuant to ~ 771.l17(d). (c) Class III (EAs). Actions in which the significance of the environmental impact is not clearly estabilished. All actions that are not Class I or II are Class III. All actions in this class require the preparation of an EA to determine the appropriate environmental document required. ~ 771.117 Categorical exclusions. (a) Categorical exclusions (CEs) are actions which meet the definition contained in 40 CFR 1508.4, and, based on past experience with similar actions. do not involve significnt environmental 32663 impacts. They are actions which: do not induce significant impacts to planned growth or land use for the area; do not require the relocation of significant numbers of people; do not have a significant impact on any natural, cultural. recreational, historic or other resource; do not involve significant air, noise, or water quality impacts; do not have significant impacts on travel patterns; or do not otherwise, either individually or cumulatively, have any significant environmental impacts. (b) Any action which normally would be classified as a CE but could involve unusual circumstances will require the Administration, in cooperation with the applicant, to conduct appropriate environmental studies to determine if the CE classification is proper. Such unusual circumstances include: (1) Significant environmental impacts; (2) Substantial controversy on environmental grounds; (3) Significant impact on properties protected by section 4(f) of the DOT Act or section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act; or (4) Inconsistencies with any Federal, State, or local law, requirement or administrative determination relating to the environmental aspects of the action. (c) The following actions meet the criteria for CEs in the CEQ regulation (section 1508.4) and ~ 771.117(a) of this regulation and normally do not require any further NEPA approvals by the Administration: (1) Activities which do not involve or lead directly to construction, such as planning and technical studies; grants for training and research programs; research activities as defined in 23 D.S.C. 307; approval of a unified work program and any findings required in the planning process pursuant to 23 D.S.C. 134; approval of statewide programs under 23 CFR Part 630; approval of project concepts under 23 CFR Part 476; engineering to define the elements of a proposed action or alternatives so that social, economic, and environmental effects can be assessed; and Federal-aid system revisions which establish classes of highways on the Federal-aid highway system. (2) Approval of utility installations along or across a transportation facility. (3) Construction of bicycle and pedestrian lanes, paths, and facilities. (4) Activities included in the State's "highway safety plan" under 23 D.S.C. 402. (5) Transfer of Federal lands pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 317 when the subsequent action is not an FHW A action. 32664 :-~ Fede,"l Reg!".. / Vo.. No. 167 / Fdday, Augo,' 28. 1987 / !, and Regulation, .= - ~._. ---~--=:':'-=-=.'~-===-'" -.--'"' '--=-'~'-'- ... (6) The installation of noise barriers or alterations to existing publicly owned buildings to provide for noise reduction. (7) Landscaping. (8) Installation of fencing, signs, pavement markings, small passenger shelters, traffic signals, and railroad warning devices where no substantial land acquisition or traffic disruption will occur. (9) Emergency repairs under 23 U.S.c. 125, (10) Acquisition of scenic easements. (11) Determination of payback under 23 CFR Part 480 for property previously acquired with Federal-aid participation. (12) Improvements to existing rest areas and truck weigh stations. (13) Ridesharing activities. (14) Bus and rail car rehabilitation. (IS) Alterations to facilities or vehicles in order to make them accessible for elderly and handicapped persons. (16) Program administration. technical assistance activities, and operating assistance to transit authorities to continue existing service or increase service to meet routine changes in d(~mand. (17) The purchase of vehicles by the applicant where the use of these \ehicles can be accommodated by EXisting facilities or by new facilities which themselves are within a CEo (18J Track and railbed maintenance and improvements when carried out within the existing right-of-way. {19J Purchase and installation of operating or maintenance equipment to be located within the transit facilitv and with no significant impacts off the ~ite. (20) Promulgation of rules. regulations, end directives. (d) Additional actions ~ which meet the criteria for a CE in the CEQ regulations (40 CFR 1508.4J and paragraph (a) of this section may be designated as CEs only after t.dministration approval. The applicant shall submit documentation which demonstrates that the specific conditions or criteria for these CEs are satisfied and that significant environmental effects will no! result. Examples of such actions include but are not limited to: (1) Modernization of a highway by resurfacing. restoration, rehabilitation, reconstruction, adding shoulders. or adding auxiliary lanes (e.g.. parking, weaving, turning, climbing). {2J Highway safety or traffic operations improvement projects including the installation of ramp metering control devices and lighting. {3J Bridge rehabilitation. reconstruction or replacement or the construction of grade separation to replace existing at-grade railroad crossings. (4J Transportation corridor fringe parking facilities. (5) Construction of new truck weigh stations or rest areas. (6) Approvals for disposal of excess right-of-way or for joint or limited use of right-of-way, where the proposed use does not have significant adverse impacts. (7) Approvals for changes in3ccess control. (8) Construction of new bus storage Clnd maintenance facilities in areas used predominantly for industrial or transportation purposes where such construction is not inconsistent with existing zoning and located on or near a street with adequate capacity to handle anticipated bus and support vehicle traffic. (9) Rehabilitation or reconstruction of existing rail and bus buildings and ancillary facilities where only minor amounts of additional land are required and there is not a substantial increase in the number of users. (10) Construction of bus transfer .'laciJities (an open area consisting of passenger shelters, boarding areas, kiosks and related street improvements) Iwhen located in a commercial area or ~ther high activity center in which there s adequate street capacity for projected ~ us traffic. (11) Construction of rail storage and maintenance facilities in areas used predominantly for industrial or transportation purposes where such construction is not inconsistent with existing zoning and where there is no significant noise impact on the surrounding community. (12) Acquisition of land for hardship or protective purposes; advance land acquisition loans under section 3(b) of the UMT Act.3 Hardship and protective 3 Hardship acquisition is eariy acquisition of property by the applicant at the property owner's request to alleviate particular hardship to the owner. in contrast to thers. because of an inabilitv to sell his property. This is justified when the ~ property owner can document on the basis of halth. safety or financial reasons that remaining in the property poses an undue hardship compared to l'thers. Protective acquisition is done to prevent imminent development of a parcel which is needed for a p,'oposed transportation corridor or site. Vocumentation must clearly demonstrate that development of the land would preclude future transportation use and that such development is imminent. Advance acquisition is not permitted for the sole purpose of reducing the cost of property for h proposed project. - buying will be permitted only for a particular parcel or a limited number of parcels. These types of land acquisition quality for a CE only where the acquisition will not limit the evaluation of alternatives. including shifts in alignment for planned construction projects. which may be required in the NEPA process. No project development on such land may proceed until the NEPA process has been completed. (e) Where a pattern emerges of granting CE status for a particular type of action, the Administration will initiate rulemaking proposing to add this type of action to the Isit of categorical exclusions in paragraph (c) or (d) of this section, as appropriate. ~ 771.119 Environmental assessments. (aJ An EA shall be prepared by the applicant in consultation with the Administration for each action that is not a CE and does not clearly require the preparation of an EIS. or where the Administration believes an EA would assist in determining the need for an EIS. (0) For actions that require an EA, the applicant, in consultation with the Administration, shall, at the earliest appropriate time, begin consultation with interested agencies and others to advise them of the scope of the project and to achieve the following objectives: determine which aspects of the proposed action have potential for social. economic, or environmental impact; identify alternatives and measures which might mitigate adverse environmental impacts; and identify other environmental review and consultation requirements which should be performed concurrently with the EA. The applicant shall accomplish this through an early coordination process (Le., procedures under ~ 771.111) or through a scoping process. Public involvement shall be summarized and the results of agency coordination shall be included in the EA. (cJ The EA is subject to Administration approval before it is made available to the public as an Administration document. The UMTA applicants may circulate the EA prior to Administration approval provided that the document is clearly labeled as the Dpplicant's document. (d) The EA need not be circulated for tomment but the document must be made available for public inspection at the applicant's office and at the appropriate Administration field offices in accordance with paragraphs (e) and (f) of this section. Notice of availability of the EA, briefly describing the action and its impacts, shall be sent by the /p, , Sent By: ZIMMET UNICE SALZMAN & FELDMAN P;7277233772; . 17 Nov 612:07; Job 281 ;page 1 ZIMMET, UNICE, SALZMAN & FELDMAN, P.A. Two Prestige PIllet: 2650 McConnick Drive, Suite 100 C1earwafer, Florida 33759 FlIT A D, conus DONNA J, FEInMAN JOSEPH II. GRAVES ROBER! E, HEYMAN RRF.r T. JARDIN!;: ANDK.I~W J. SAI.7.MAN T It lrNlCn, JR. NICOl,,!;' E WEISS ^IAN S. ZIMMET rclcptlUll~ (/27)721-1712 Fac~imile: (727)723-142 J Wcbsllc: \\'ww':\lsn,)\1d:nm TIH~ Information contained in tbis trausmission Is attorney privile~cd and confidential. It is intended only for the use of tbe individual or entity namtd below. trtbe reader of tbis message is out the intended recipient, you arc hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or COI>Y of this communicatiolll!ii ~trictly prohibited. (fyou have received this communication in error, pleaf$e notity u~ immediately by telephone collect and return the original message to liS at tbe above address via the U.S. Po~tal Service. We will reimhurse you for posta~e. Thank you. FROM: **PLEASE DP)!1'ER TIlE FOLLOWING PAGES TOu ~ ffi-~~ FAX: 0"-~' ;J - .4/.:;;-.7 &~ ~.. .:1 /(" (,/t..t..L~'-i'4-" ( ) t."Nt-'n!.~~J / /// 7/0 (;;/ FILE #- j-j7Jd./// DATE: ~-, We arc transmitting a total of ..) pages lncluding our CQVl,;! letter. If you do not receive all of the pages, please call back as soon as possible. PHONE: (727) 723~3772; FAX: (727) 723-1421, Original documents wiIVwtit-net'{ollQW by mail. ()fJj/ji /0 lPlJ/!t&rr (J" lL1- OOllhtt IJfCll&. ir!; I/'U{ V~ U5 p MlJYlIUfJl)t~ )t%1o j?~ Uk / 0Y 111m tn2.. ~ I tJlJ}/- )1J r)U:::J- ~ " Sen1 By'. ZIMMET UNICE SALZ MAN & FIMAN P'7277233772' , , 17 NOV.12:07; Job 281 ;page 2/5 ZIMMET, lJNICE, SALZMAN & FELDMAN, P.A. Two Prestige Plaec 2650 McCormick Drive, Suite 100 Clearwlllcr, Florida 3375~ ELlT A D, COllij~ OONNA J FBT ,DMAN .IO~F.PH II, GRAVii$ ROB!::HT E. HEYMAN FIREr T. JARDINE ANDR!::W J. SALZMAN T, R ITNlen, JR. NICOL!:: E. WEISS ALAN S. 7.IMMET TcJ~l-'hulJe, (727)123-3772 Fac~imlle: (727)723-1421 Wc!mtc: www ,/ll~tl~w.,HHn Nuvl:mbcr 17. 2000 Via Facsimile - 5()~:4576 Cyndi llar<.l.in Cily of Clearwater 112 S. Osceola Avcuue Clearwatt:f, FL 3~758-4748 Re: PST A Site De;:!r Cyndi: This is in response to yuur l~-mai I of NovembtJr 15, 2000 requesting lh~ criteria for ~ite sdcctj,on for the new PSTA terminal in downtown Clearwater. It is not feasible to provide an all- encompassing list ofthe criteria necessary lor the site for this terminal, especi ally ill light of th~ lact that Federal Regulations gOVtln1 PSTA' s selection of a site and construction of a terminal. With that lUldcrstnnding. I woulu provide ynu the following criteria: 1. A minimlllTI or two acres, 1.ectangular or 8QU8JC in shape. 2. 111 downtown Clearwatl;L 3. Guud road access availabl~ OIl two sides and preferably, three sides of the propr:rty. 4. Locali;.:d within twn hlocks of a major alienal road. 5. The site needs to be rela.tively clean from an environmental standpoint. It also needs to meet the appruval ofthe l"ederal governm~T1l with regard to on..site environmental1ssues as well as what the Federal governmenl rders to a.s the environmental impacts on the surrounding OOOl)1b23.WflIJ r Sen1 By: ZIMMET UNICE SALZMAN & ~MAN P;7277233772; 17 NOV.12:07; Job 281 ;page 3/5 nt:ig,hhorhood. I am enclosing a copy of a pOltion of the applicable federal reg~llations under which PSTA received what is called a ca.tegorical exclusion for the envirotllncntnl impacts OIl the neighboring properties lor the Laura Street ~ilc. 6. The site needs to ItJquirc minimal site ckaring and/or demolition. 7. Tht: site does not pre~enl scriou~ drainage is!:>lIl':s. H. Sufficient infrastructure (water, sewer, public utilities) are available. Under the federal regulations, the property IHlIst be purchaBed in a voluntary purchase and C..UlIlot be ohtained through PST ^' s condemnation powers. I trust thi!'> provides Yl)U with the general guidelines and criteria with regard to a selection of a site tor the PST A terminal and j s sufficient 10 assi st the City stafr in pursuing the direction of the City Commission. I f you need my additional information, plea...e do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely yours, ZIMMET, UNter., SALZMAN & FELDMAN, P.A. ASZ/jas Enclosures ee: Ralph Stone Pam Akin, Esq. Roger C. Sweent:y UO<)0762-1 wf'f1 , Sent By: ZIMMET UNICE SALZMAN & ~MAN Pj7277233772j 17 NOV.12:07j Job 281jpage 4/5 ... .::-:-- Federal Rc~ifjter I Vol. 52. No. 161 I Friri<lY, AugtLst .28. 1987 I Rlllp.!l and Regulations -- __I l41 Approvals 01' 1I.1,:t:tlplallr.A~ or public in~ol\li:nltmt/publir. hl7il1ring PI'vUtlUUres prior to the pubthll.ltion datA of this rcguli,ltiulI remain vlIUd. (i) Applir.anlS for cupillll aR~If:tllnr.;p' in Ih", IJMTA pro.'lram Ilchic\lC puu\i{; participation on pruposed proJAr.fll by holding Plluhc hOArlngs and lH.'ckill8 input from the publiu IllfoUKh the limping prucess for Alwirorunenlal uucumenlll. For projcctl.l rellulrinll HISs, a ('IllbHc hcuril1ll will hft hAld l'furlng the dt'\':ulation pArtnd of the dl'aft EIS. For all orhAr projeCIS, lIn opportllnlty fM public hellrinsrs will be affvl'llt:u with lldAqllAte prior notice pur~lIant tl) 49 U.S.C. 1602(d). 16(l4!1). 1007u(C} Ilnd 1607a-1 (ri), and such hellrin!l~ will be held when IinyonR with a sigllificllnt lIor.JAI. Monomic, or environmentlll inh"re~t in lhe mllltj'!T requcsts it Any hflllrlng On the acti~m must hA cQUruillilted with the NEPA pl'UI,;ellS to Ihe hlllest cxllllll possihlA. m Illfvrml:llion on the UMTA environmental pi'lJCe9S may hA ohl8incd from: Director. Offll':e of PluunillJol As!;IMAnCe, Urbun Millis Trllnllportatioll Ad11linislration. W!lshingtou. DC 20590. InforrMIiQll on tlll! FHWA envirumnental proMM may Ill;) ublllined from: Director. Offive of Environmental Pvlicy, Fedllrall fighway Adminislrrttlon, WMhingtoll. DC 20590. f 171.113 Timing of Admlnl$ln'ltlon actlvllle.. (1I) Thl'! AdminisLn~tion in r.oo\'lfJratiol\ with Ih!,! lIpplicant will perfot'1l1 the work lIt!ctlssary to comph~te Il FONSI Or an RIS anu comply wllh ether rcll1led environmentallaw9 lInd rAgldAtions to tho uU:lxlmum l'!lctent pos~jule during the NEPA prOCl:lI11. This wnrk lnclude~ environmentAl Bludi~s. rell:lted Angineel'i1l8 sludies. aSl!ncy cool.'uillt.ltion 1.l11dpubl1c Involvemcut.l-lowevAr, nnal dP.llign ac.tivities. property l'Icquillitiun (with the exception of htiruship And ptoteclivc buyinll. as defined ill . 771.117(dl). pllrchll~ll of conlltructiOI1 matcl'iul:l or rolling 8tock. 01' pl'uject com:tTllct\on 5hall not proceed until tilt: f\,lllowinR have been c\,IllIIJleted: (11ft] The action htls been r.lA~5ified U:l a catllguricillllxclulllon (CE). Or (ii) A FONSl hils bCIi'n ~pprovAd, or (iii) A final EIS hU:I been llpproved and al/lIi1l1ble for the presc1'iueu period of limA and a record of decision has been sillmHl; (Z) For sr.tlons proposccJ [or FIIW A funding, the FHWA IJlvl8ion I\dminiRtralor has received and ar.c...pted the certificlltlnns and lJl\~' required public heal'ing trl:lnscriptll requlrp.d by 23 U.S.C. lZA; 13) For activities propnt;ed for FHWA fundinl!. the prngrammillll requiremAnts of 23 CFR Part 450. Subp,l!'1 B. l:lnd 23 CFR Part 630. Subpart A, hAVe been Ill"t. (u) Fur PHWA, the completiun of the rp.Cjlllrement9 lIet Corh in par!lgraph (a)(1) und (11)12] of this llcCUon is considllrAd <,CCCpIUllCI! of thA general projcel location and con';:\:j.ll~ descrihao III the l"nvirol1ullmtal dar.llmerit llnles~ otherwl~!l 8pecificd lty the IIpprovlng official. However, Aur.h Approval dUt:9 not commit the Admillblralion to APPI'VVC \illY futurA grl\l1l requc::.t uf fund lhll prp.ferred altcrntltivc. (e) Letters uf Intent ill~lIpd nnder lhe l:Iulhor1fy of section 3(U)(4) of thA llMT Act QI.t: Ilsed by LIMTA to indiCliltt: \in il,lllntlon to obiilll:lle future fund!! for multi-ye\ir capital trllnsit proj~'\':lll. LattArl'l of Inlent will not hA IMued by lJMTA until th NF.PA prOO\!~:I is compll7itf'd. 5771.115 Cla..e. of actio", There orc tlu'ee dUll All of action\l which pr!lllr.rlbe the Icv~l uf (iOCllmClllllliun reqlllrl>.tll.Tl the NE:PA pfOce.u. (II) Class / (E/Sy). Actionll thai si~nificllnlly affect the environment rAqll(re an tIS (40 O'R 150A.:m, The folluwin,ll am j'!l(,qmplcs I)f IIctions that normally fcquired an [<:15: .. (1) A new contmlled 30CllS11 freeway. (2) A Illghway pl'vjecl of four Of more l<9nes 011 1:1 new lOCAtion, (:jl New c:nnstruction 0[' tlxlension .,f flxl'd cuil U'lllU,i1 faciHtle!! (e.g" rOlJill I'<.\il. ll!lht rail, commu\\:!c rllil. autnmated s"lrleway tl.'oUlSit). (4) New confltruction or el\lensioll of R IHlp:m1te roadwlIY for bUlles or high o/,;uupancy vehicles llullucl:Itlld within an existill" hillhwllY facility. (0) Clalll: fl (CE$). Actiuns thHt do not Individually or cumul<\live haVIll:l ~i!!nificllnt enviromlUmll:ll effect Are p.xl"!lIded from lhft rAq\lirem(ontlv . pl.t!lJl:lrll an r.A or EIS. ^ specific Hilt of CEil nOl'llIully not rflt]ulrlng NEl"A JucumlJnfsllion ill sel forlh in ~ 77l.117{c). Whlln lIppropriutdy dor.llmented, additionlll prnjechl may al~o ljul:Ilify as CEs pUCliuunlto ~ 771.117(d). (el Class 1Jl (EA$.J. ActioUll in whic.h thA Illgnlficancc of lhe ftnvlronmenlal ImpO(;1 i~ not c1Aar!y estllbili~llt;!d. All l:IctioM that lirc nut CI8.11ll I or II arc Ctli$S Ill. All actions in this d1:l3ll rftqulre the prepAration of I:In EA to determine the appruprialft envlronnwnlal dor.nment requil'l~d. ~ 771.117 Categorical exclulIlons. lal Categol'ioul excluslonfl (CEs) art! actions which mMt the dcfi~lilion contaiMd In 10 eFR 1506.4. lind, bllaed on past <:xlJl:cience wllh 8imilal' actions. do not involve significnl environmental 32663 impacts. They l:ln" It{;tions which: d... not induce slgniflr.llnt Impacts to plUllUl!d growth ol'llilllcJ use for the arAR; do not require the relocation or ~illllificllnl Ilumut:!u of peoplA; no not have a significant imVlolcl un I:Iny natural, [;ul\ural. rflcrAiltlOM!. historic 01' uth~r reSource; do IW! illvolve slgnlflr.llt'lt air, ~Joise. or watM quality impacts: do not h.we significulll impacts on travl'Il plIlterns; or do no! othecwial.!. l:ither Individually \)I' cUlllulstivllly, hAve any si!{nifieant environmental impacts. (b) Any action which nonnally would be clll8slfllld aB II CE bul cOl,lld involve unusual cin:umlllanCllA wIll require the Admlnllltratlon. in COQPcrllllon with the appliCltlll, 10 conduct appropriate environmental studicli tv delllrmlnA If the CE c1u.ssiflcBtlon III proper. Su(;h unullulIl clrcumslances include; (1) Significl:lnl envircmmAntAllmpacts: (~) Substantllll Ml'ltrovcrs)' 011 Elnvlronmeutul grounds; (3) 8ignificant impAct on propcl'\iell protected by sectiQu 4(0 of the nOT Act or sectiun 106 of the NMional Hilltoric PrAIlArvalion Act; ur (4) InconsilllenciAs with <lny Fcdc!'ul, Stllte, or IOCllllaw. requirement or i1dmilliatclllive detArmlnation rclallllg to the flnvlronmcnlulllspt:!cls of the !lction. (c) The following actions meet the criteria for CEs in the CEQ rflJ;!ulatlon {section 1608.4} and ~ 771.117(a) of lhi~ re~ulatlon And normally do not rAqulre any fl,ll,ther NEPA approvals by Iha Administration: (1) Actlvctie9 which do not lovolve or leud dlrllctly to construction, such Sll pl:lIl11inllund tllchntr.RI studies: gl'llilta for training and rl:lleilrch programs; rl:9l:l:Il'!:h actlvltl1l8 1\6 defined in 23 !l.S_C. 307: appruvl:ll of a unlflArl work pl'IJilrltm and any findings requireu in the pt.'\nnins pl'vce99 pursuant to 23 V.S.C, 134; approval of statewide programs under 23 CF'R Part 630: tlpprovlIl of project conccplll uncit!r 2:1 eFR Pari 476; enRinellrlng to define the elemAnt" of a propoQllu t:lction or llllcl'Il\itives so that sodal. cconomic. and envlronmelltlll effects r.lln be allll~Hf3ed: and Ferlerl\l.aid sy~tem revltllons which estllblish c:IA8AM of highwtlys on the Federal.aid hishwuy lIYlllem. (2) Appcuvtll of utHlIy lnstallal(l)llll II10nlo'l or aCrO$8 a InUlllportation fMlIlty. (3) Consll'uclion of bicycle And pedestrian lanes. paths. anu fl:lcilities. (4) Activities inclut.llld in thft StMa's "highw<lY ulety plan" undr.r 2a V.S.C. 402. (~) TrllnRfer of FedCI':lII.ll1ds pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 317 when thA subsequent lit:!itm is nnt an F"HWA 8l.:!Iun. 17 N .12'08' Job 281,'Page 5/5 UNICE SALZMAN & ~MAN Pj7277233772j ov. , Ff)thmlJ Rc~ilillU I Vol. 5L, No. lG7 / Fl'iullY, August 26, 19(}7 f Rult:lI Hnd Regulations ~---~-,==- ~ ~...- ~~ ......,..,. _h- - .,---:.~&II b,..,.".,. Sent By: ZIMMET 82664 " , (6) The instlllliltioll ~)r noise hi! rri('l'li or ulterlltlons tQ tll\isfing public;ly ownl'!d buih.lillj:!S tn provhh~ for nolF:e r~'(.hJ,(;lion. (7) Luuc.lllcaping. (8) tnl:li'lllatiOll of f/!nr.i'18. si!jns. I'<'lVCIlIt:nl markings. lllnllll p:lMengl:I' tlheltf!rll. lraffic slKnaffl, and ruilrOAd warning devit:~a wh~re no l'lllbstJl\lilll land Al';qui~llion or trl:iffic tlil.lfuplfM will occur. (A) F.ml!,!~ency rp'p(lil'~ under 23 n.S.C. 123. ('In) A~4UisillM of ~o,;enic ftilllp.ltlcntM. (111 Delcl'minlilion of pll~.bI;lCk undAf 23 eFR Part 4AO for property prevloulily IlcQIII~d wilh Flldllrill-aid plirlicipatll>n. (lZ) Improvcmlmllllo p.xrllling l't::lt 8rAlIllllnd lruck weigh Ijtllllons. (13) RJdeshal'iull acUviti~s, ('14) Bllll ami rllil cor rehabilrlRtica. (15J Alter'alionll to fllcHitil!li or vllhides in order to 1IIlika IhAm &lccllllAiblc (ur eldArly and III.lndicBppf;'d pm'lluns. [HI) PrOH1'lIm adrniniSll'lItion, tp.chnicol a~>>illtlincp. activities. snd Opcl'Qlinlj aj;~i6tauce to trAMi! lluthoritlRlllo \,'\mtinull ex.isting sl!rvlr:e Qr lu/,;reasfl ~l~nicc tu meAt rouliu(: chllnSM in dllmllnd. (17) The pnrth~lSl,: ~lf vehlr.IFls by the tlpplir.anl where thlllll;e of these 'dlic:lt!s can np. 3.ccommodatf'!d by existing facilities or hy new fllcillti~1l 'r\.hio;:h Ihemslllvcs /,Ue within II CEo (lA) Track Hnd ri\Hbcd mfiintAMncc 1I1ld ImprOltt>.mcntll whftn t":.~ll'ried oul wllhin tllf,! existing right-tiC-way. (19) PurllhJ.1SC und inl:t!\!lJltion of r'I1oratiflll or maint~n(lnce equipment to IH: IOCIlIp.ci within th" trllnsil fitcility and with no lli!(niflr.allt impucta 0(1' the aile. (ZO) PromulSl:Ilion of rules. fe~ullltlf.lnll. I!nd din:ctivI!A. (d) A\ldilional actions .. which nleet the crllAtbl for l\ CE In lhe CEQ ceRulllttons (40 CPR JfJl)8.4) and p(lrAgrnph (I;I) of Ihlll section may be tlesiSIIlltlld ;Ill CEs unly affp.l' t'.dmll'\istl'l:\tion approval. The llllpHc<lnt dudl submit dOCUlmmtatlOll which :iAmonstI'ulell lhallhe specific ;OI11.1itionll nr critli!rill for lhf"sC C~s IIfG :atlllficd UlIU lhal ~lgnifi(:llnt ~1\Vlror.ml'!tJtal eCfer:lll wUl nol result. \x.amples of llur,h actions il'll:hlde bul Ire nOlllmited 10: (1) Mudllrni:l:atloll of 8 hlghwny by J esurfacing. restoration. l'l:hllbililatlon, : OCOfllltrucllol'l, adding shoulders. or I ddlng 6ux(Jillry lanes (11.8.. purlrlng, 1lcaving. turning, climbing). 121 HighwllY BllIaty or traffic ( perl/lions Improvement projt\cls i lcludlng the inslall.~tion of rump r IctCrlnR cantrol devlcell and Iigbting. [3) Aridg~ rehahll!tRtioll, r ~a011litruclinn Or rli:placemp.:\t 01' Lhe C Instrur-tiorl or grade tU~P;\t'uli,m ta rnplace existing Il!-grad~ r/'lilrO!ld cl'oll6ing$. (4) Tr:ln<ipol.tullon corridor frilllle pal'kin~ faclliti(:~, (5) COHlltructll'ln of new truck wP.igh stations OJ' re3t IIrp.II.!\, (6) Appr"vals fur dispOAill of o:Xcess right-or-way or for julut or IImltfld u~e of rlght.of-way. whl'!re the proposed \Ise dOfl~ not hi3\'1! signjfl....'~nt auvefse i/:Jpllcta. (7) APVI'OVlllll for dllil.l111cli in ~(:<;ess control. (8) Con!;truction of new hus SIUrllF{1l lInd nUlintllnAncc fucilitiBB In 81'Ca1j used predominuntly for induslrl81 or tfl!.n~portljtion ptlrposes where SliGh I.:onstru(';tion is not inr.....l'lsistent with cxilllinR :!:nnlng [ludlocstAd On or near 8 street with adp.quate GlIpaclty Ii') h,wdle 811tlcipUI\:U bUB And Buvport vehldl'! traffr c. (9) RlIhahifitaliun or rill:nnslruc!ion of nisting rail nnd bus building,; Elnd >>ncilhl/,'y CacillltM where only min.or amnunts uf IiddHj'1l'1allallu lIrl! required IInd there is nola suhAllinlial increallA in thl! numh...r of ut!\:rs. ('to) Cunslru\-tl"n or LUll transf...r .~(Icllltics (un open IIrea coulIillting of ~ttllsllng...r shelters, bOMding QrellS, iosks and rel:;tted strcllt ImprOVl.'lXlents) 'hen located In a (;ummilrr:iA,1 SfeEl Or \..~ther h41h ar.tlvlly center in which thCl.t:l . s adequQte strllAI capacily fOf projected us traffic, (11) Construction uf rallllforagc und malnlClllinclI facilitjl,!ll in ar811& used prt'ldominl.lnlly for fndUlltrial or InlnllpMtatlon purpniles wlwre such coolllructlon is not inconldstclll with ~'(i.sll[),ll zoning (lwl where there is IIQ Ilign.;fic<lnt noise imj)lll:l on the llurrot.md1ug community. (lOll Ar.quisilion of lanrl for harllship ('tr protective pUrpQlleS; IldVAnr..e lanll acquisition IOllnA nndCl' sectinn 3(b) oC (he 111vfT Acta Harr1.~hip uad protar.tiv~ -- "'.....---.-- a 1I'lrds/jlp IIG'lujllili'm 1. ..,ly ~cq";~ilioa ur 1"'operlY by lh~ lIJ1pllcAI'l! at the I'mp<lrty oWn.r'. '~qu~ll h. .1I~vlale ~"rticulllr h;lrdahlp 10 the own.,.. in contr"l to 1111"0. bee.u.. of a/I Inohililv III ..,11 hi. prl)l'.rt~. Thi" il!u.lifi.d whIm lh.. . I"'IJP<lrty OWnet '''In docum.nt ouU", 1>'181. or h.!slth, ."toly '" ilnRftClllll'1laslln. tl>RI ~Ill.jnillg in th. prop"dy pnSH an undu" 11llrrlshlp COmpAI.".l Ir, "'nel'a. PtotlctlVI: IIr'lulllllion I. ,I",,,, 10 preV~l\t im/llj'w'lt \I"VOllll""""' 0(.. parc'" which I, l'Ialded fn," P'''I'''...d t'anapol'l~ lil10 corridor or IU". llll"umenlatloll Inll'l clearl, d81H"n.lr~l~ th~l ll~veJ"pmenl "I the land WUlllJ Ilrl~cludt (lItUI'tl tranepoHoli"" lite and lha' ~l".'h devetoptn~lIl i. Imnun.l,,!. Ad\lllnclI aellui_Hion II not p'lnnill<:d for I:I~ tluh~ purpO'8 or I'~dtlci"~ th~ ~oat \II IJ"J~rt.Y ror . pi'llJl"...(1 PNiIJCt "'If dtS.:::,. buying will bc }Jl;;wlilleu only for ~ pa!"lic.;uIMr parr:1'1 or a limited number of (llltcels. Th~l.l<! types of land M:quisilivlI qUI1Hty for Il CR only where the Ar:quisiliotl will not limit lh~ evaluation of alternillfves, includillll ~hlfts tn Illignllllml for plannl'ci (';OnstJ'udlon projnch, whi.ch IlI11Y be required in th~ NF.PA pr'ocess, No prOject dt:velopml'nt on Bur.h Illnd may pruceed until the NF..PA prucess ha~ hp.pn completed. (c) Where a pllttl'tn emel'Nell of granting ell stUIUli for 8 I'Hlrticull.u: type of action, thl' Administl'ttlion will Inftblle ruIClllttkl[]j:! propMing ttladd this lype of adlnn t.O the I~il of cBtpgoric..1 E'xclu~ilJns In paragrilph (e) or {d} of this lectinn, as a ppl'OPrltl Ill. ~ 711.1t9 Envlronm.ntaluMllImentB. [1:1) An EA Ilhall be P1wared hy thl: IIppllcallt ill consultatIon with Lhe Auministratlon for euch action that ]9 not ,1 CE \Iud dOAIl not c1eady requlrA the prfll':Iri'ltioll of tin HIS. or where Ihe Admillt:ltrtllion !ll\!jeves (Ill EA would Ilssisl In clclcl'IUiulllg thp. no;!p,d Cur un RIS. (b) F~lr ttC!lone that l'\:\iuire an EA, the IIppllC:<lTIt. in ~;(}nsultafll'ln with the Administration, ~hall. tllthe !ladies! IIppropriatc lime, bngin Mnsl,Jltlltion with inter~lItp.d agencies and olh~r!l to advise them oC the Rr.nJ'le of the projlld und to achlf"vc the Collowing objecliv\1s: detcl'millll which IlllpectlluI \he propo!'ll~d Action hiive potAl1lial fUI' e.ocial. economlr.. or ell v ll'UlIffien tal impar.t; identify I;lllernallves nnd melllilures which might llIHiglltA advcrs\: envlronmcl)lltl impactt'!; ttnd idl!lltify olher en\'ironmental n:view and cOMullatioll requirftmAnls whiGh should \.Jll performed eoncllrrenlly with the fA. The app!il.:llntllhaIlIlCCOlllpli:ih thill through an !'!arl1' (;oordinatlon prOl.:l;ISlI {l.e.. procedurel! under f 771,111' or through A SCOpilll!! prOCARI'I. P'ublic lnvolvt:menl Jlhall be summllrizlln !lTid the rA!lultll of agency r:oordin<lthm ~h!ll1 be induded in the EA. (c) The lo:A ill aubjcl.:L 10 Administl'<llion approv,ll befure it is made aVlIlIablc to the publlr. as dll Adminiah'alion dM1Jn1C1Jl. The UMTA QPplicl!nts IMy circulatA the F.J\ prior tn Adminl:ltrution approwl providAri that the dor.lln1cnt ill dearly I<lbc!cd I,U the npplicQnl's dor:ument. (d) The ~A Med not VI: circulllted for wmmllnt but the document mUl.l1 be made I,tvl:Ii!ablll for public illJlpecllon ..It the aflplicant'~ oWeR and at the appl'oprlate Adminilll.l'ulion fl..ld offi/,;t1s in ar.eordal\~\: with parl'tgraph:i (e) and (f) of Ihis lISctlM, Notice of avnilabilHy oC tbe F.A. !",'(eny d~llcrlbing llw action Ilnd lt~ ilnpl,l\:ts. sha II be S()lll by thl;! ~ .oolo 10-25-00; 3:48PM;CITY CLERK DEPT. . .;727 562 4086 # l' 4 ~ ~#~)lfllTater ~ ~Wi~Jll "I _ ''''~w;.." ~..I' City of Clearwater, Florida City Clerk Department Phone (727. ) 562-4090 Fax (727 ) 562-4086 o TO: FAX MESSAGE Q~ HOAk LOCATION: FAX NO.: COMMENTS: ~~OM FROM: ~~ LO! &5"/C!)o I I ~t DATE: NUMBER OF PAGES THIS :MESSAGE (INCLUDING TIllS PAGE): 10-25-00; 3;48PM;CITY CLERK DEPT. . ;727 562 4086 . # 2/ 4 . _,'#.tI.r',~." ,'~~LO' T~ -r-........ ....~._\ ~......~..Ir.~~_ '" ~,. ...... ,~-- \ ~ ,,~ I ~--.....- ltQ,',\ I, '::.~- lt~~'" .-... ; '; "'-~:""""" ~lt _.~~ ==".... ~lt .rt' - ............ ~.. ~~~...:::::;::;. .,~:~ -"'?'IjJ)-;:;;;;"~~"" ............,"t TE~t ,." ~"'"I.JJ CITY OF CLEARWATER POST OFFICE Box 4748, ClEARWA1'!1R, FLORIDA 33758-4748 CITY HAll, 112 SOUTH OSCWLA AVE:':UE, CI.E.AR.\X'A'('F.R, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHO~'E (127) 562.4090 FAX (727) 562.4086 DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY CLERK NOTICE TO TAXING AUTHORITY Pursuant to Section 163.346, Florida Statutes (1997), the City Commission of the City of Clearwater, Florida, as the governing body of the City of Clearwater, Florida, does hereby give notice to each taxing authority. as that term is defined in Section 163.340(2), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1998), of its intention to adopt a resolution in accordance with Section 163.360, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1998) amending the community redevelopment plan for the community redevelopment area located in the downtown area of the City of Clearwater (the Downtown Redevelopment Plan) as described in Resolution No. 95-65 adopted by the City Commission on August 17, 1995. The revised community redevelopment plan to be considered by the City Commission will change the recommended Medium/High Density Residential classification of two parcels located north of Park Street between Myrtle Avenue and Greenwood Avenue, the recommended Open Space/Recreation classification of parcels located from Myrtle Avenue east to Ewing Street and from Park Street south to Court Street, and the recommended Medium/High Density Residential classification of properties located on the north side of South Greenwood Avenue from Park Street south to Chestnut Street as well as properties located south of Court Street north of Chestnut Street from Myrtle Avenue to South Prospect Avenue to the CommerciallOfficelResidential classification. . The City Commission will consider Resolution No. 99-35 immediately following a public hearing to be held Thursday, September 2, 1999, beginning at 6:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as possible, in City Commission Chambers, at City Hall, 112 S. Osceola Avenue, Clearwater, Florida. The proposed modifications to the community redevelopment plan to be considered by the City Commission at the public hearing ~ available for inspection at Planning & Development Services, Municipal Services Building, 100 South Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, Florida. August 12, 1999 Ol\"E CITY. O!'iE FUTURE. BHlM J. AUr>GST. MAYOR-COMMISSIONER ED HOOPF.R, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER ED HAR"r, COMMISSIONER * BOil ClARK, CO~\llSSIONER ].B. JOHNSON,]R., COMMISSIONIlR IIJ:"'-\l 1=;'.'""'1'''''\Ir-\'''''' \'""'" 'T"""T""'~"'" ,\,......u.". T:'~I..,.,""'\''T"T''.. . . . c " " \~,/ ,// , 10-25-00; 3;48PM;CITY CLERK DEPT. .....-~ . .;727 562 4086 # 3/ 4 CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF PUBUC HEARING CITY COMMISSION Thursday, October 1, 1998 (at 6:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard) A public hearing will be held by the City of Clearwater, Florida, in the City Commission Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Avenue, Clearwater, Florida, to consider Resolution No. 98-47 which will affect the following proposed modification to the Downtown Redevelopment Plan. The City of Clearwater intends to modify its community redevelopment plan for downtown Clearwater to eliminate the recommended Office classification and amend to Office/Residential Commercial. The property is located at 1180 Cleveland Street and is 1.21 acres. Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearing or file written notice of approval or objection with the Central Permitting Director or City Clerk prior to the hearings. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board or Commi~si9n, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings. will need a record of the proc~edi.ngs and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings in made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. . All individuals speaking on public hearing items will be Sworn in. Lou Hilton Economic Development Cynthia E. Goudeau. CMC City Clerk City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748. Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 A COPY OF TIDS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN THE CITY CLERK DEPT. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REOUlRING REASONABJ.lE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN TmSMEETING SHOULD CALL THE CITY CLERK DEFT. WITH THEIR REOUEST AT (727) 562-4090. Ad: 9/19198 . . ~-'- ~.::_.~..._.." =-1, - 0)-/' -~ u -- ::s ~ -. :-'J ZLr l::::) ,.'-1. ~ g~.:.-...~.~~... C'-' ;1 " I t::::J U. I ~ CC ~_I' I. ' 'CIC\ 1-.C~ ~a! 'C::::) .:) t.,) i 1!!!:!J Q r rr;:::::::--" . J ~ Co . 15' \:~ _J:5 I. -':-:- ,a.. , 10-25-00; 3;48PM;CITY CLERK DEPT. ~-:-- . on oatIl says that she is Clnssificd Billing 1 Hil.!sb )rough COUl1ty, Florida; that the ;727 562 4086 . # 4/ 4 -~ ished a1 Tnmpa in said Hillsborough Dusly p'blishcd in said Hi1Isbo:ollg~ er at tht post office in Tampa, In said first pu )Iicntion of the attached copy of ised an) person. this advertisement for LL~' _'al~ _lay s ~O\ ~\?) . (;~~. Ci-=rB\- R/'2ll/99 . . (I ~ II~ '1~ ~ 'r:J C'I t- I'~ g G~"~rl C) C) C) C'I )J ~ I-cr ZW UJt: ~~ 0,,5 0'-' '-' <L iJ..J1..IJ >...J UJ()1 Cu.l coc,o! 1 . ~ <'earwater u ONE CITY. ONE FUTURE. City Attorney's Office Interoffice Correspondence Sheet TO: Sue Diana, Assistant City Clerk FROM: Pamela K. Akin, City Attorney SUBJECT: Amendment to CRA Plan DATE: October 23, 2000 You appear to be asking whether modification of the Community Redevelopment Plan requires the notification of taxing authorities. Fla. Stat. 163.346 states in pertinent part as follows: Before the governing body adopts any resolution. . . approves, adopts or amends a community redevelopment plan . . . the governing body must provide public notice of such proposed action pursuant to . . . 166.041(3)(a) and, at least 15 days before such proposed action, mail by registered mail a notice to each taxing authority which levies ad valorem taxes on taxable real property contained within the geographic boundaries of the redevelopment area. Therefore, an amendment of the CRA plan does require notice by registered mail to each taxing authority 15 days prior to the proposed action. PKA:jmp . . Hardin, Cyndi From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Hardin, Cyndi Wednesday, October 25,2000 11 :27 AM 'AZimmet@zusflaw.com' Keller, Bob; Akin, Pam; Stone, Ralph; Dougall-Sides, Leslie; Goudeau, Cyndie RE: dates for CRA plan amendment u u CC agenda cover re CRA Agenda cover re PSTA.doc PSTA.doc Alan-the staff report that was sent to the City Commission is the same one that you have from the COB meeting. The only new document is a cover page that summarizes the staff report. There is one agenda cover page for the Community Redevelopment Agency and one for the City Commission since they are two separate boards each with different responsibilities on this item. I attach the cover pages as files to this e-mail.lftheydonotcomethrough.callmeandlwillsendyouahardcopy.As I stated before, the dates are the CRA on Monday, November 13, 2000. the City Commission will review the item on Thursday, November 16, 2000. The City Clerk will have the agendas prepared about one week prior to November 13. Thanks. -----Original Message----- From: Alan Zimmet [mailto:AZimmet@zusflaw.com] Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 8:53 AM To: chardin@clearwater-fl.com Cc: bkeller@clearwater-fl.com; cgoudeau@c1earwater-fl.com; Isides@clearwater-fl.com; pakin@c1earwater-fl.com; RStone@clearwater-fl.com Subject: Re: dates for CRA plan amendment Is there a set procedure that the CRA or Commission will follow at these meetings? If you do not know the procedure, I would appreciate it if Leslie or Pam would answer this question as soon as possible. Since the CRA is one week from today, I assume that the agenda and staff report will be ready today. Can you fax these to me? This e-mail transmission and the information contained in this communication is confidential and may be legally privileged, proprietary information intended for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If you have received it in error, you are on notice of its status. The unauthorized use, distribution or disclosure of this communication is strictly prohibited. Please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message from your system. Thank you for your cooperation. Alan S. Zimmet Zimmet, Un ice, Salzman & Feldman, P.A. 2650 McCormick Dr. Suite 100 Clearwater, FL 33579 Telephone:(727)723-3 772 Fax: (727)723-1421 >>> "Hardin, Cyndi" <chardin@clearwater-fl.com> 10/20/00 04:19PM >>> Alan-as promised- as soon as we scheduled the plan amendment to be considered by the CRA and City Commision, I wanted to let you know. The CRA will review the amendment on Monday, October 30,2000 starting at 9 am. The City Commission will review the amendment on Thursday, November 2, 2000 starting at 6 pm. The clerk will have an agenda approximately one week prior to these meetings for you to see where you are on the agenda. 1 . . l.L Updated as of 9/27/00 o >- I- o AGENDA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD Date: Tuesday, October 17, 2000 Time: 1 :00 p.m. Place: 112 South Osceola Street, 3rd Floor, Clearwater, Florida, 33756 (City Hall Commission Chambers) The City of Clearwater strongly supports and fully complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Please advise us at least 72 hours prior to the meeting if you require special accommodations. Assisted listening devices are available. Kindly refrain from using beepers, cellular telephones and other distracting devices during the meeting. Florida Statue 286.0105 states: Any person appealing a decision of this Board must have a record of the proceedings to support such appeal. CALL TO ORDER, INVOCATION, PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL Chair Figurski Vice-Chair Mazur Gildersleeve Johnson Moran Petersen Plisko City Staff A. REQUESTS FOR CONTINUANCES: Case: LUZ 00-08-10 - 1106 Druid Road B. CONTINUED ITEMS: None CDB agenda - 10/17/00 - Page 1 C. LEVEL THREE.PLICATIONS: . 1. Case: ANX 00-08-19 - 107 & 111 McMullen Booth Road Owners/Applicants: Michael A. Ciaramello & Thomas Kelly. Location: 0.56 acres located on the east corner of McMullen Booth Road and Bay Lane, approximately 200 feet south of Drew Street. Request: Annexation of 0.56 acres to the City of Clearwater. Presenter: Etim S. Udoh, Senior Planner. 2. Case: LUZ 00-08-09 - 107 & 111 McMullen Booth Road Owners/Applicants: Michael A. Ciaramello & Thomas Kelly. Location: 0.56 acres located on the _east corner of McMullen Booth Road and Bay Lane, approximately 200 feet south of Drew Street. Request: (a) Land Use Plan amendment from RU, Residential Urban Category (County) to RIaL, Residential/Office Limited Category (Clearwater); and (b) Rezoning from R-3, Residential, Single Family District (County) to 0, Office District (Clearwater). Presenter: Etim S. Udoh, Senior Planner. 3. Case: LUZ 00-08-11 - 3070 Chesapeake Lane (M&B 22/21) Owner/Applicant: City of Clearwater/First Baptist Church. Location: 4.9 acres located on the west side of McMullen Booth Road, approximately 450 feet south of Drew Street. Request: (a) Land Use Plan amendment from OS/R, Open Space/Recreation Plan Category to INS Institutional Plan Category; and (b) Rezoning from OS/R, Open Space & Recreation District to I, Institutional District. Presenter: Etim S. Udoh, Senior Planner. 4. Case: ANX 00-09-13 - 2071 Lantana Avenue Owner(s)/Applicant: James H. Olson & W. Patricia C./City of Clearwater. Location: 0.13 acres located on the east side of Lantana Avenue, approximately 230 feet south of Union Street. Request: (a) Annexation of 0.13 acres to the City of Clearwater; (b) Land Use Plan amendment from RU, Residential Urban (County) to RU, Residential Urban Classification (Clearwater); and (c) Rezoning from R-4, Residential, Single Family District (County) to LMDR, Low Medium Density Residential District (Clearwater). Presenter: Etim S. Udoh, Senior Planner. CDB agenda - 10/17/00 - Page 2 5. Case: ANX 0.-14 - 2014 Poinsetta Avenue . Owner/Appli t: Yanith Kheang.lCity of Clearwater. Location: 0.12 acres located on the west side of Poinsetta A venue, approximately 100 feet east of Betty Lane. Request: (a) Annexation of 0.12 acres to the City of Clearwater; (b) Land Use Plan amendment from RU, Residential Urban (County) to RU, Residential Urban Classification (Clearwater); and (c) Rezoning from R-4, Residential, Single Family District (County) to LMDR, Low Medium Density Residential District (Clearwater). Presenter: Etim S. Udoh, Senior Planner. 6. Case: ANX 00-08-15 - 1407 Nursery Road Owner/Applicant: Michael Biros & Linda Biros. Location: 0.17 acres located on the south side of Nursery Road, approximately 110 feet east of Sunny Park Road. Request: (a) Annexation of 0.17 acres to the City of Clearwater; (b) Land Use Plan amendment from RL, Residential Low (County) to RL, Residential Low Classification (Clearwater); and (c) Rezoning from R-3, Residential, Single Family District (County) to LMDR, Low Medium Density Residential District (Clearwater). Presenter: Etim S. Udoh, Senior Planner. 7. Case: ANX 00-09-17 - 1708 E. EI Trinidad Drive Owner(s)/Applicant: Christine L. Thacker & Jack L.Thacker.lCity of Clearwater Location: 0.18 acres located on the west side of E. EL Trinidad, approximately 160 feet north of State Road 590. Request: (a) Annexation of 0.18 acres to the City of Clearwater; (b) Land Use Plan amendment from RL, Residential Low (County) to RL, Residential Low Classification (Clearwater); and (c) Rezoning from R-3, Residential Single Family District (County) to LMDR, Low Medium Density Residential District (Clearwater). Presenter: Etim S. Udoh, Senior Planner. 8. Case: ANX 00-09-18 - 1880 McMullen Booth Road Owner/Applicant: RIC Properties Limited/Judith A. Rogala/City of Clearwater. Location: 0.89 acres located on the west side of McMullen Booth Road, approximately 170 feet east of Oak Forest Drive E. Request: (a) Annexation of 0.89 acres to the City of Clearwater; (b) Land Use Plan amendment from RS, Residential Suburban (County) to RS, Residential Suburban Classification (Clearwater); and (c) Rezoning from R-R, Rural Residential District (County) to LDR, Low Density Residential District (Clearwater). Presenter: Etim S. Udoh, Senior Planner. CDB agenda - 10/17/00 - Page 3 D. LEVEL TWO AeICATIONS: . 1. Case: FL 00-08-31 - 2189 Springrain Drive Owner/Applicant: Jeff Mack. Location: 0.15 acres located on the east side of Springrain Drive, approximately 235 feet north of the Keene RoadlSpringrain Drive intersection. Zoning: LMDR, Low Medium Density Residential District. Request: Flexible Development approval to reduce the rear (east) setback from 15 feet to 10 feet and reduce the side (south) setback from five feet to 1.8 feet, as part of a Residential Infill Project. Proposed Use: A 900 square foot two-story addition to an existing 1,898 square foot single-family dwelling. Presenter: Mark T. Parry, Planner. 2. Case: FL 00-08-30 - 1135 Marshall Street Owner/Applicant: William Roberson. Location: 0.16 acres located on the southwest comer of Marshall Street and North Madison Avenue. Zoning: MDR, Medium Density Residential District. Request: Flexible Development approval to reduce the front setback from 25 feet to eight feet (Marshall Street), reduce the front setback on North Madison Avenue from 25 feet to 22.5 feet and to reduce the minimum lot size from 10,000 square feet to 6,900 square feet, as part of a Residential Infill Project. Proposed Use: A 1,632 square foot addition (as part of a separate dwelling) attached to an existing 760 square foot dwelling (two units total). Presenter: Ryan Givens, Planner. 3. Case: FL 00-07-28 - 616 E Street Owner: Cinevision Properties and Scott Hoover. Applicant: Devendra N. Amin. Location: 0.94 acres located on the north and south sides of E Street, approximately 300 feet east of Hamlet Avenue. Zoning: IRT, Industrial, Research and Technology District and MDR, Medium Density Residential District. Request: Flexible Development request to permit a medical clinic in the IRT District, Medical Clinic site - reduce required number of parking from 56 spaces to 39 spaces, reduce the (north) rear setback from 20 feet to one foot, reduce the (east) side setback from 20 feet to five feet, Off-site Parkim! site - permit a nonresidential parking lot in the MDR District, reduce the (north) front setback from 25 feet to six feet, reduce the (east) side setback from five feet to two feet, reduce the (south) rear setback from 10 feet to four feet, and increase the impervious surface ratio from 0.65 to 0.69 as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project with a Comprehensive Landscape Program. Proposed Use: An 11,200 square foot medical office. Presenter: Ryan Givens, Planner. CDB agenda - 10/17/00 - Page 4 6. E. 4. . Case: FL 00-_2 - 443 East Shore Drive Owner: Steve~no and Penelope Patapis Applicant: Euro 2000 Development, LLC. Location: 0.66 acres located on the northeast corner of East Shore Drive and Papaya Street. Zoning: T, Tourist District. Request: Flexible Development approval to increase the permitted height from 35 feet to 100 feet, reduce the side (east) setback from 10 feet to seven feet, reduce the front (west) setback 15 feet to 10 feet along East Shore Drive, and reduce the front (south) setback from 15 feet to 10 feet along Papaya Street. Proposed Use: A 19-unit condominium development. Presenter: Ryan Givens, Planner. 5. Case: FL 00-08-34 - 100 N. Greenwood Avenue Owner: Trust for Rehabilitation and Nurturing Youth and Families, Inc. Applicant: Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority. Location: 3.48 acres located on the northwest corner of Greenwood Avenue and Laura Street, south of Grove Street. Zoning: D, Downtown District. Request: Flexible Development approval to increase the height of a Public Transportation Facility from 10 feet to 36 feet and to allow a Public Transportation Facility to be constructed in the LDR, Low Density Residential and MDR, Medium Density Residential Districts, as a Comprehensive Intill Redevelopment Project with Comprehensive Landscape Program. Proposed Use: A public bus terminal. Presenter: Mark Parry, Planner. Case: CRAOO-09-01 Clearwater Redevelopment Plan Amendment - 100 N. Greenwood Avenue Owner: Trust for Rehabilitation and Nurturing Youth and Families, Inc. Applicant: Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority. Location: 3.48 acres located on the northwest corner of Greenwood Avenue and Laura Street, south of Grove Street. Zoning: D, Downtown District. Request: An amendment to the Clearwater Redevelopment Plan from Low Density Residential and Medium/High Density Residential Categories to Public/Government Category. Proposed Use: A public bus terminal. Presenter: Mark Parry, Planner. DIRECTOR'S ITEMS: · Update of annexation, land use plan amendment and rezoning cases F. ADJOURNMENT \\MS2\PDS\P/w1I1ing DCl'arfll1enf\C D B'v:lgendas DRC & CDB\CD8I200rAIO OcrobeAi;db age/Ida IO.f7.00.doc CDB agenda - 10/17/00 - Page 5 - I . CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS FILE COpy The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday, October 17,2000, beginning at 1:00 p.m., in the City Commission Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Avenue, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests: 1. Trust for Rehabilitation and Nurturing Youth and Families, Inc. (Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority) are requesting an amendment to the Clearwater Redevelopment Plan from Low Density Residential and Medium/High Density Residential Categories to Public/Government Category (Proposed Use: A public bus terminal) at 100 N. Greenwood Ave., R.J. Booth's Sub, Blk 2, Lots 1-6 and Sarah McMullen's Sub, Blk 2, Lots 1-10 less Rd right-of-way. CRA 00-09-01 Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearings or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning and Development Services Director or City Clerk prior to the hearings. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. All individuals speaking on public hearing items will be sworn in. Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning and Development Services Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756, or call 562-4567. Lisa Fierce Planning and Development Services Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC/ AAE City Clerk City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing. A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS A V AILABLE IN THE CITY CLERK DEPT. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL THE CITY CLERK DEPT WITH THEIR REQUEST AT (727) 562-4090. Ad: 10-07-00 fiLE COpy C (LA (fD. (f1 , 0 ) ~ o Updated as of 9/11/00 >- f- u ACTION AGENDA DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE September 7, 2000 1. 9:30 am Case: FLS 00-08-55 - 1715 Sunset Drive Owner/Applicant: Peter and Dona Leach. Location: 0.25 acres located on the southeast corner of Sunset Drive and Sunburst Court. Zoning: LMDR, Low Medium Density Residential District. Reqnest: Flexible Standard Development approval to reduce the front (north) setback from 25 feet to 15 feet along Sunburst Court. Proposed Use: A new 2,500 square foot single-family dwelling. Presenter: Mark T. Parry, Planner. ACTION: The DRC recommended APPROVAL of this application subject to the following conditions: 1. That the sidewalk be removed where the proposed driveway apron is to be located, per City standards; 2. That the driveway length be 20 feet minimum from property line to any structure; 3. That a tree survey be submitted; 4. That the Code criteria be addressed explaining how this setback reduction will be in keeping with the character of the area; 5. That the site plan be resubmitted house to the east is at 18 feet, will redo a site plan with that setback; and 6. That all conditions must be met prior to development order. 2. 9:45 am Case: FLS 00-08-57 - 401 East Shore Drive Owner/Applicant: Joseph Pijanowski. Location: 0.24 acres located on the northeast corner of Pier 60 Drive and East Shore Drive. Zoning: T, Tourist District. Request: Flexible Standard Development approval for a boat charter business as an accessory use to an existing moteL Proposed Use: A boat charter business with two boats. Presenter: Mark T. Parry, Planner. ACTION: The DRC recommended APPROVAL of this application subject to the following conditions: 1. That no required parking spaces be displaced; 2. That no maintenance or repair of boats be permitted on site; 3, That storage and dispensing of fuel meet the requirements of the Harbor Master, Fire Department and other applicable officials; 4. That no additional signage be permitted on site; 5. That the hours of operation be limited to 9:00 a.m. to Y2 hour after sunset, seven days per week (consistent with the jet ski rental business); and 6. That proof of insurance liability be provided prior to the issuance of an occupational license. (Note: The boats will be 30-50 feet in length, to hold 26-50 passengers.) DRC agenda - 9107/00 - Page 1 3. 10: 15 am Case: FL 00-08. 2189 Springrain Drive . Owner/Applicant: leff Mack. Location: 0.15 acres located on the east side of Springrain Drive, approximately 235 feet north of the Keene Road/Springrain Drive intersection. Zoning: LMDR, Low Medium Density Residential District. Request: Flexible Development approval to reduce the rear (east) setback from 15 feet to 10 feet and reduce the side (south) setback from five feet to 1.8 feet, as part of a Residential Infill Project. Proposed Use: A 900 square foot two-story addition to an existing 1,898 square foot single-family dwellillg. Presenter: Mark T. Parry, Planner. ACTION: The DRC reviewed this application. It will be forwarded to the CDB for review at its October 17,2000 meeting, if the following information is received by Tuesday, September 12,2000: 1) Fifteen sets of revised plans and the complete application for CDB packets (stapled, folded and collated); Address criteria with valuation; and Need interior layout of existing house and proposed addition. 2) 3) 4. 10:45 am Case: FLS 00-08-54 - 1015 Sedeeva Street Owner/Applicant: Robert and Tonya Stauffer. Location: 0.22 acres located on the south side of Sedeeva Street, approximately 500 feet east of Edgewater Drive. Zoning: LMDR, Low Medium Density Residential District. Request: Flexible Standard Development approval to reduce the front setback from 25 feet to 18 feet. Proposed Use: A front porch attached to an existing single-family dwelling. Presenter: Ryan Givens, Planner. ACTION: The DRC recommended APPROVAL of this application subject to the following conditions: 1. That the steps not exceed 18 feet from the front property line and the porch to be 20 feet from the property line; 2. That any request to enclose the front porch be submitted to staff; and 3. That the architecture of the porch be in keeping with the existing house. 5. Case: FLS 00-08-56 - 235 North Garden Avenue Owner: Alan Bornstein. Applicant: Y ockenfloster, Inc. Location: 0.23 acres located on the southeast corner of North Garden A venue and lones Street. 11:15 am Zoning: D, Downtown District. Request: Flexible Standard development approval to locate a new building in the Downtown District. Proposed Use: A 1,543 square foot office building. Presenter: Ryan Givens, Planner. ACTION: The DRC recommended APPRO V AL of this application subject to the following conditions: 1. That existing solid waste service be relocated to the new site (one black barrel); 2. That the site plan data table be revised to reflect correct information, prior to development order; 3. That the building be moved closer to North Garden Street, while respecting a sufficient setback to existing trees, in accord with the Downtown Guidelines, prior to development order; 4. That the retention be moved to the rear of the building, prior to development order; D RC agenda - 9/07/00 - Page 2 5. That the handicap sp,v'''s meet Code requirements including dimensior ''1d a flat, paved surface adjacent to the space.'or to development order; I 6. That the landscape p meet or exceed all code requirements inclu a tiered effect along the street frontages, prior to development order; 7. That all water meters to be removedlrelocated at owners expense, prior to certificate of occupancy; 8. That the owner (s) or contractor to be responsible for all applicable fees associated with the new meter, prior to certificate of occupancy; 9. That a sidewalk be provided on Jones Street, prior to certificate of occupancy; 10. That a handicap ramp be provided at intersection of Jones Street and Garden Avenue, prior to certificate of occupancy; 11. That the stormwater retention basin be designed to a 50-year storm, prior to certificate of occupancy; 12. That the TIF owed for site ($1,990/1,000 sq.ft. GFA) be paid with the at certificate of occupancy; 13. That the driveway be designed with a 15-foot radii, prior to development order; and 14. That a revised tree survey be submitted, prior to development order. 6. 11:45 am Case: FL 00-07-28 - 616 E Street Owner: Cinevision Properties and Robert A. Luke. Applicant: Devendra N. Amin. Location: 0.25 acres located on the north side of E Street, approximately 300 feet east of Hamlet A venue. Zoning: IRT, Industrial, Research, and Technology District. Request: Flexible Development approval of a medical clinic in the IRT District with a reduction in the required number of parking from 56 spaces to 40 spaces and a nonresidential parking lot in the MDR District, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project with a Comprehensive Landscape Program. Proposed Use: An 11,200 square foot medical office. Presenter: Ryan Givens, Planner. ACTION: The DRC reviewed this application. It will be forwarded to the CDB for review at its October 17,2000 meeting, if the following information is received by Tuesday, September 12,2000: 1) That fifteen sets of revised signed and sealed plans and the complete application for CDB packets (stapled, folded and collated) be submitted; 2) That all criteria (including valuation) be addressed; 3) That solid waste requirements be met including pad and 12-foot by lO-foot enclosure; 4) That a revised site data table be provided to reflect correct information, specific to each parcel; 5) That the parking lots be dimensioned including driving aisles and parking spaces; 6) That handicap parking spaces meet the requirements of Code, with respect to dimension and location; 7) That a landscape plan be submitted to exceed requirements of Code including a tiered effect along all street frontages; 8) That the property ownership and authorization for be confirmed regarding the CSX railroad property; 9) That access to the nonresidential parking lot be addressed; and 10) That a revised tree survey be submitted. 7. 12:30 pm Case: FL 00-08-30 - 1135 Marshall Street Owner/Applicant: William Roberson. Location: 0.16 acres located on the southwest corner of Marshall Street and North Madison A venue. Zoning: MDR, Medium Density Residential District. Request: Flexible Development approval to reduce the front setback from 25 feet to eight feet (Marshall Street), reduce the front setback on North Madison Avenue from 25 feet to 22.5 feet and to reduce the minimum lot size from 10,000 square feet to 6,900 square feet, as part of a Residential Infill Project. DRC agenda - 9/07/00 - Page 3 Proposed Use: A 1,632 square foot addition (as part of a existing 760 squ.. oat dwelling (two units total). Presenter: Rya vens, Planner. sep:lrate dwelling) attached to an . ACTION: The DRC reviewed this application. It will be forwarded to the CDB for review at its October 17,2000 meeting, if the following information is received by Tuesday, September 12,2000: fifteen sets of revised (signed and sealed) plans and the complete application for CDB packets (stapled, folded and collated); 2) That the criteria address the existing and proposed valuation; 3) That solid waste service be provided for the second unit; 4) That the driveways be dimensioned including 16-feet of width and 20-feet of length; and 5) That a sidewalk be provided on both street frontages. 8. 2:00 pm Case: FL 00-08-32 - 463 East Shore Drive Owner: Steve, Dino and Penelope Patapis and Paschoalina Potter. Applicant: Euro 2000 Development, LLC. Location: 0.99 acres located on the northeast corner of East Shore Drive and Papaya Street. Zoning: T, Tourist District. Request: Flexible Development approval to increase the permitted height from 35 feet to 92 feet and reduce the front setback from --- feet to --- feet along ------. Proposed Use: A 19-unit condominium development. Presenter: Ryan Givens, Planner. ACTION: The DRC reviewed this application. It will be forwarded to the CDB for review at its October 17,2000 meeting, if the following information is received by Tuesday, September 12,2000: lIIFifteen sets of revised plans (signed and sealed) and the complete application for CDB packets (stapled, folded and collated); 2) Address criteria with valuation; 3) Solid waste service required with pad and 12 x 10' enclosure and where the area for recycling bins will be. End to street is not a good place for a dumpster, need to show staging area on Papaya Street; 4) Add note to plans indicating "it is the responsibility of the owner to roll the dumpster to a designated location at an assigned time as approved by the Solid Waste Superintendent"; 5) Site plan data table to contain correct information including both existing and proposed information; 6) Revise site plan to position building closer to street property line; 7) Investigate the possibility of providing a wider sidewalk along East Shore Drive; 8) Provide pedestrian access along the east side of the building to the existing dock; 9) Provide 18 feet of separation to the seawall, as required by the Building Code, or provide some other acceptable solution, to the satisfaction of the Building Official; 10) Access to the building to be provided from the street; 11) Landscape to exceed requirements of Code including a tiered effect along the street, upgraded landscaping, provided on separate sheet with larger scale; 12) Indicate material and colors on the elevation drawings; 13) The increase height of the buildings needs to be justified by an improved design and/or appearance; 14) Remove the dumpster from the R.O.W.; 15) Open space recreation impact fees to be paid prior to development approval; 16) Redesigned driveways; 17) Sidewalk required on Papaya Street; 18) Parking circulation to be redesigned to be counter clockwise (dimension the parking); 19) Need a complete tree survey; 20) Address stormwater retention; and 21) Need to provide one hydrant within 40 feet of the fire department connection and one within 300 feet of the building. DRC agenda - 9/07/00 - Page 4 . . 9. 2:30 pm Case: FL 00-08-33 - 3006 Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard Owner: Thanh Phuoc Ngyuen. Applicant: Michael S. Caruso. Location: 0.28 acres located on the north side of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard, approximately 42 feet west of Meadow Lark Lane. Zoning: C, Commercial District. Request: Flexible Development approval of a nightclub with a reduction in the required number of parking spaces from 20 spaces to 18 spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project with Comprehensive Landscape Program. Proposed Use: A 2,132 square foot nightclub. Presenter: Mark T. Parry, Planner. ACTION: The DRC reviewed this application. It will be forwarded to the CDB for review at its October 17,2000 meeting, if the following information is received by Tuesday, September 12,2000: lIFifteen sets of revised plans and the complete application for CDB packets (stapled, folded and collated) 2) Revise CIRP criteria to justify request in terms of valuation (existing and proposed) and upgrade of site with respect to architecture, landscaping and signage; 3) Solid waste service required with pad and 12 x 10' enclosure (see if already approved by Jim Maglio); 4) Parking spaces need to meet all requirements of Code; 5) Clarify address - 3004 or 3006 Gulf to Bay Boulevard; 6) Clarify maximum number of employees, maximum number of customers at one time (peak time too); 7) Provide evidence of shared parking agreement to park employees offsite or some other acceptable solution (valet service, make site larger, etc.); and 8) Provide note on plan that pavers around all trees to be removed by hand. 10. 3:15 pm Case: FL 00-05-19 - 1590 Gulf Boulevard Owner/Applicant: Belleview Biltmore Resort, Ltd. Location: 1.38 acres located on the west side of Gulf Boulevard, approximately xxx feet south of Marina Del Ray. Zoning: C, Commercial District (HDR District pending). Request: Flexible Development approval, as a Residential Infill Project, to reduce the front setback from 25 feet to five feet, reduce side setback (north property line) from 10 feet to zero feet, and increase height of building from 30 feet to 100 feet. Proposed Use: A lO-story condominium building with 20 units. Presenter: Ryan Givens, Planner. ACTION: The DRC reviewed this application. It will be forwarded to the CDB for review at its October 17,2000 meeting, if the following information is received by Tuesday, September 12, 2000 (or some other approved date - the companion LUZ case for this site is scheduled for review by the City Commission on September 21, 2000): I) Fifteen sets of revised plans and the complete application for CDB packets (stapled, folded and collated) DRC agenda - 9107/00 - Page 5 11. 4:00 pm 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) Revise residential infi" roject to reflect the current plans in terms of hr. ~t; Provide solid waste .. Jtion staging area; . Show how access wi provided to the beach; Clarify how the adjacent properties heights were measured (Dan's Island and Cabana Club); Show correct information in the site data table and indicating existing and proposed data; Any required open space/recreation impact fees to be paid prior to development approval, need updated existing and proposed floor area (building coverage); 8) Provide colors and materials on elevations; 9) Any R.O.W. work will require a Pinellas County Permit application has been applied for prior to the issuance of any permits; 10) Revise landscape plan (plant sizes) to meet or exceed Code; 11) Separate domestic water line tap required; 12) Need to dimension the angled parking aisle and spaces; 13) Handicapped parking to meet requirements of Code; 14) TIF impact fee ($953/unit less credits) due prior to issuance of a CO; and 15) Parking garage needs to be drawn to scale. Case: FL 00-08-34 - 100 N. Greenwood Avenue Owner: Trust for Rehabilitation and Nurturing Youth and Families, Inc. Applicant: Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority. Location: 3.48 acres located on the northwest corner of Greenwood Avenue and Laura Street, south of Grove Street. Zoning: D, Downtown District. Request: Flexible Development approval to increase the height of a Public Transportation Facility from 10 feet to 36 feet and to allow a Public Transportation Facility to be constructed in the LDR, Low Density Residential and MDR, Medium Density Residential Districts, as part of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project with Comprehensive Landscape Program. Proposed Use: A public bus terminal. Presenter: Mark Parry, Planner. ACTION: The DRC reviewed this application. It will be forwarded to the CDB for review at its October 17, 2000 meeting, if the following information is received by Tuesday, September 12, 2000: .Provide 15 sets of revised plans (including signed and sealed plans) and the complete application for CDB packets (stapled, folded and collated); 2) Provide revised landscape plan to provide a tiered effect, irrigation system, plant table (list), to meet or exceed code; 3) Provide a separation between pavement for buses and sidewalk; 4) Provide a sidewalk utility easement on the north side of the site for public sidewalk; 5) Provide radii improvements at all four intersections and compatible sidewalk and utility easements; 6) Clarify intent of providing a second sidewalk along the west side of the site; 7) Provide separation between taxi stand and pedestrian areas and striping of crosswalk between taxis and building; 8) Provide requisite dumpster enclosure to meet Code; 9) Address Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria in written form; 10) Remove all existing unused aprons; 11) Remove all hazardous trees; 12) Add tree survey to site plan; 13) Add direction to building elevations; 14) Provide information about hours of operation, maximum number of employees on site, maximum number of buses and taxis on-site, pedestrian activity on site, security, etc. and how site will function in terms of bus and taxi service on residentially-zoned property; (Note: A separate request to amend the downtown redevelopment plan through the CRA will be submitted by the applicant.) DRC agenda - 9/07/00 - Page 6 . . S:\Planning Department\C D /JIagendas DRC & CD8\DRC\2000\09 SeptembeADRCagenda 09-07-00.doc DRe agenda - 9/07/00 - Page 7 . . CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday, October 17, 2000, beginning at 1:00 p.m., in the City Commission Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Avenue, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests: 1. Jeffery O. & Donna D. Mack are requesting a flexible development approval to reduce the rear (east) setback from 15 ft to 10 ft and reduce the side (south) setback from 5 ft to 1.8 ft, as part of a Residential Infill Project at 2189 Springrain Dr., Spring Lake of Clearwater, Lot 41. FL 00-08-31 2. William M. Roberson, Jr. is requesting a flexible development approval to reduce the front setback from 25 ft to 8 ft (Marshall St.), reduce the front setback on North Madison Ave. from 25 ft to 22.5 ft and to reduce the minimum lot size from 10,000 sq ft to 6,900 sq ft, as part of a Residential Infill Project at 1135 Marshall St., Fairmont Sub, Blk G, Lot 1. FL 00-08-30 3. Scott A. Hoover / Cinevision Properties is requesting a flexible development approval to permit a medical clinic in the IRT District, Medical Clinic site - reduce required number of parking from 56 spaces to 39 spaces, reduce the (north) rear setback from 20 ft to 1 ft, reduce the (east) side setback from 20 ft to 5 ft, Off-site ParkinR site - permit a nonresidential parking lot in the MDR District, reduce the (north) front setback from 25 ft to 6 ft, reduce the (east) side setback from 5 ft to 2 ft, reduce the (south) rear setback from 10 ft to 4 ft, and increase the impervious surface ratio from 0.65 to 0.69 as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project with a Comprehensive Landscape Program at 616 ESt., Belleair, Blk B, Lots 9-13 & Belleview Court, Elk B, E 50 ft of Lot 6. FL 00-07-28 4. Steve & Dino Patapis are requesting a flexible development approval to increase the permitted height from 35 ft ot 100 ft, reduce the side (east) setback from 10 ft to 7 ft, reduce the front (west) setback 15 ft to 10 ft along East Shore Dr., and reduce the front (south) setback from 15 ft to 10 ft along Papaya St. at 443 East Shore Dr., Clearwater Beach Park 1st Add Replat, Blk C, part of Lot 9 & Lots 10-12 & subm. land. FL 00-08-32 5. Trust for Rehabilitation and Nurturing Youth and Families, Inc. (Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority) are requesting a flexible development approval to increase the height of a Public Transportation Facility from 10ft to 36 ft and to allow a Public Transportation Facility to be constucted in the LDR, Low Density Residential and MDR, Medium Density Residential Districts, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project with Comprehensive Landscape Program at 100 N. Greenwood Ave., R.J. Booth's Sub, Blk 2, Lots 1-6 and Sarah McMullen's Sub, Elk 2, Lots 1-10 less Rd right-of-way. FL 00-08-34 Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearings or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning and Development Services Director or City Clerk prior to the hearings. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. All individuals speaking on public hearing items will be sworn in. . . Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning and Development Services Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756, or call 562-4567. Lisa Fierce Planning and Development Services Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC/ AAE City Clerk City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing. YOU ARE BEING SENT THIS NOTICE IF YOU ARE THE APPLICANT OR OWN PROPERTY WITHIN 500 FT. OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. A COpy OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS A V AILABLE IN THE CITY CLERK DEPT. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODA TION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL THE CITY CLERK DEPT WITH THEIR REQUEST AT (727) 562-4090. Ad: 09-30-00 t'ine \lets ;::")y")COl\St Ira..flSI + ftutho r[ +/ lifoLtO t-ft-l-h S+ N . C\ ean.~-\-er ) -r:L- 3"6 7 ~;). A\a..n S. 2\mrY\~+.) G~. P.6. Bo:>,- 61 ~4- Ueo..ru::o...-k.r) Fe.. 3375~'"51~ D(:lFi:L,(i(~[., ETI--I[I.. 1403 N MYRTLE AVE STE A CL,[(~I?(I.J(~ TCh: F'L,. ~.~) ;~; '/' ,~::,.5 :2 E:, (;, .1 \i I i.jC: PI.(~CE L..L,.C:: 121 N OSCEOLA AVE 2ND PL C::L.E(.lRI/,,1('1 T[F~ FL_ ?;; ~S '/ .21 .~:::I ~:t () ::S '9 GRIC::E" [)(~\/I[) I~>I 90~::: DFi~EI,\1 :';:,;T CL.[AFi~\".lnTE:f~ FL :::; :5 "/ 51 .~:~ ,4 .:;1 1 :~:~ 1"1 h: 1/.,1 I i"~ c: 1:1 R (>1 '{" .J 0 1,1 t..,! 1..,.,1 204 PENNSYLVANIA AVE C L. E ('I r::: 1/.,1 (~Ir [ r;: F L :.'~:) :5 'l.:.;. .~:~I ~:l4 :,:) '/ BRADLEY. .JAMES E BRADLEY. JOYCE J .~) 1 :5 .J C) I',,! [: :3 :3T C:: L...I:~: (>1 F;: 1..\) PI T E F~ F L. ?~; ::; 'l.~, 5 4l~. :2 /1 THOiYI(~IS" \i I C:::<.l L. 1 () () () D f~: F: J,..,1 ~:,T C: L. E (:1 I:'! 1/.) ATE h: I~': L :::~; :5 )" .~:':I E:, t:l ~~I :>:: .1 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY FLAG SERVICE ORG INC I::, () :5 C L,. E V [ L. (:; I',,! D :::::; T C: L, E (:; Fi: 1i.,1 (':T E::: R F L. :.::; ::.::; 7' ~:; E:t ~:l () () 7' ~5 (.:1 (:1 ;~:~ ;~~; J., I:) () f.:~; v :r i"! C [: I',,! ~r' DE F' (~I LJ L, I': r) r:: ::.~ P I i'..j [' L. L. ():3 ~.:.' ....;~ .....,. I~ l~' _.~ ~,.. ", ;". LOYAL ORDER MOOSE INC CLEARWATER LODGE 1030 1101 CLEVELAND ST CLE(iR1i.)(>:TER FL. :5 .:~; ~?' .~:::I .~;:;. ,:~l r;; () ~::~ . FL CO-O~-3lf CD~ 10-/7- DO (,0 (~O I R I IF') THORNTON, .JAMES J 1124 [)RE~I,I :3T CL,.E(.iRI,I'}{:1 T[R Fl~ ::5 :5 '7 .:> .:;, (.:1 ~3 .1. '7' WATERHOUSE, RICHARD A WATERHOUSE. CHRISTINA A 2:575 1,I,)I"IITI"'i(~N ST C L E ('I F~ 1..\,1I~>;r E h: FL. :~:; ~3 ~? ~:;I .5 .4 ~? It ::~:; :.1 F~ 1,1,,1 I NC 912 DREW ST :3TE 103 CL,.E(~IR(i,)(:1 TE:F;: F~L. :?; :5 ),. 21 .:1 <=:l :;, ;~ :5 FE:RNANDE:Z, JOHN D FERNANDEZ. LINDA D ::';::1.6 P(~L.I"i 1 SL. :3(/.,1 CL E (~IF.(Ii,,1(~1 T [F:': FL. 537(,7 19.4() RE:LOCATION EXE:C TNC TRE TRUST ~ 206 4/10/00 13498 WALSINGHAM RD L.I'~'IF~GO FL. ~5?; '77 ~l :::; .::::.:? ~1 [~3('~)(TEF<:. .JE:FF' (1.,1 911 .JOHE::,:: :ST CL,FnR(I.,1('~TER F~L, ::3; ::5 "7 :) .~~:) 4 <=:1. :? c::l L. S $ () C) t.,! 1 I...! C 1010 CLEVELAND ST CL.E(')R(I,,1('~1 T[F~ FL. :3:5)" 5.5 4Ell.~:l SOCIETY ST VINCENT DE PAUL COUNCIL OF UPPER PINELLAS COUt"!TY. I /'~C 1015 CLEVELAND ST C L. E I~: Fi~ II,) (~I T E: F~ F L. ~;., ....~... ,..,. t~. 1:':' A 1:":" 'I r:" 33755 -L/6/5 CLEARWATER. -.fY OF PO E;:()>:: 47<.':: CLEI~f~I,IJ~" E:Fi~ ':T'{ OF FL . VANDERVORT, MADISON J VANDERVORT. LUCY E 1. () () ): 0 F,~ E (1,,1 ~~:~ T (~LEPlh~I,,${~ T[r~: F t_. . GRANESE. ANTHONY P TRE S~~;() F;: I C:HI0,F:D:::; CT CLE()RI,,',)A TE:h~ F'L ~:; ~5 "l.:~1 .::/ :) 4 ~~12; ~3; ~s ~/ .~::l !::I ~t !:::I ::2 1. TRE GRANESE, ANTHONY P TRE P TG~E F' T R F:: ?; :=~~ 'l .:;1 !:.~l E. i:l ~~l :S F' Tf~E KYLE. HENRY C JR ~('y'LE., I ~:;(l[j[L.LE 2903 SW 22ND AVE ~'i I I~~:I ~,.! I F 1_ :3 :51. :3 ~5 :~; (;1 .5 () ,-: JF~ .E: ~'i I (:Ii".. :5 :S 1. ~5 ~5 ~~; '):, .~S () :~; .:~; 1. ::s ,3 :S {) !S () RICHARDSON. ELSIE M 205 PENNSYLVANIA AVE N C L. [ r~~ F;~ I,IJ (;~, T [ R F~' L. :5 ?;; '/ !5 .:::1 ,4.42:; ;!:s D I )(0 I'''! " LON!\,! I E: DIXON. JOSEPHINE 207 PENNSYLVANIA AVE N C: L. E 10, F; 1"1,1 (~,T' E F~ F L :3 ~5 7" !.~l !:~I f.:1. .4 ::::. t3 CL[ARWAT[R ACADEMY INTERNATIONAL INC ;;3(:r1 DF<Ehl ST C:: L. E (:, R 11',,1 (:, T [: F~ FL. TflETA HOiviES ':;,74(. (:I\iENtJE D S(~IF!.(;~SOT,~~ F'L. :~5 4 :? :~:;; 1. f3 t:; () }' :::~; ?:; "7 .~:t .5 .::l.5 .1 7' ANDERSON, WILLIAM M C./'O F'RO SHOF' 840 CLEVELAND ST C L E (~, F;'~ 1,,',1 (:J T E F;'~ F'L. :5 :~; ? ~S .5 .4 '::1 J.. () TRUST FOR REHABILITATION & (.J, l.J F;,~r t.1 R I r-! Ci \( () tJ T f--l ,~~. F (;21 ~'i :r: LIE :::~; I / I PC) DO)< 160;3 TARPON SPRINCiS FL 346E~8 J~608 34688 1608 ( SALVIN. PATRICK TRE SALVIN. JEANIE TRE 2357 STAG RUN DLVD C L. [ (2J F< 1,,") ,~,T E F~ F L. I :52S'?t~)5 1~?:~;7 FL .:.; 4 (:)::3 (~:~; 16~ () 8 FINCH, KERMIT 0 TRE FINCH. FRANCES L TRE GREATER CLE:ARWATER CHAMBER OF COMMERCE TNC 1130 CLEVELAND ST C:L.E{:IRII',,1(~TER FL. F) (J [3 () >( 0::;:1 :Z SAFETY HARBOR FL ::5 li. 6. '9 .5 () (:r '~;~ ::? :~; .31.::1 .S .::1- f~ /t. J.. LEAHON, EVELYN H TRE 1 SEASIDE LN ~ 102 C~ L. E 10: F<~ (1,,1 (::, T E f~~ F' L S TI..JE1",!" C(~f~OL_ I':::' 4:5~~; G(~IRL)Ei"J. I (:, ST Cl[Af;~(I,,1(~, TE:h~ F'L :~:~; :5 ),. :;, (,) .1 19 ~:~ (;1 :~~) ?j "7 .~. (~;, 1. () () "/ . . STUEN. CAROL K o ST WALLACE. BENNETT A WALLACE. GAIL M 1127 GROVE Sl' CLEARWATER FL 33755 482~ MAYNARD. KIRSTEN 1109 GROVE ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 4824 DRESSER, CHRISTOPHER J 1123 DREW ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 4818 MELO. ALFREDO MELO. CONCEICA 6 PANORAMA CRES BRAMPTON ON L5G 3T9 CANADA HOUSEHOLD FINANCE CORP III 961 WEIGEL DR ELMHURST IL 60126 BARBOUR, WILLIAM R TRE 1830 OAK PARK DR S CLEARWATER ~L 33764 6437 CHITRANEE-A INC 1003 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 10.19 GUY. ALBERT L GUY, LINDA M 1689 OAK Pl. CLEARWATER FL :33755 .1.351 33755 1351 GUY. L WALKER, DALE 838 HONORE AVE SARASOTA FL 33755 1.351. 34232 2764 J WAGNER. NANCY H HARN, ~1AY E 1108 GROVE ST CLEARWATER FL CURRIE. LINDA N 1122 GROVE ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 4823 33755 4823 RICARTE. ERICA H 1112 GROVE ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 4823 CHAPMAN. WAYNE A CHAPMAN, ANNA M 3819 RIDGE TOP ANACORTES WA 98221 4431 CHURCH OF THE RECONCILER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH USA 915 DREW ST CLEARWATER FL SHALLIMAR REALTY INV INC 300 N OSCEOLA AVE ~5C CLEARWATER FL 33755 3917 33755 452() MILLS. GLENN W MILLS, WILMA 9174 98TH AVE LARGO FL FLORIDA POWER CORP C/O TAX DEPT CX1G PO BOX 14042 ST PETERSBURG FL 33777 1720 33733 4042 FL WARD. DEBRA K POBOX 2184 CLEARWATER FL 33'757 2184 33733 4042 . . ::551'(;.} 1.()1.9 1.<. I t"~G::3L"E\"., CI~h~OL. 1.524 SMALLWOOD CrR C: L" E (~ F,~ \1.,1 p:) T [; F~ F L, ~~;; 3 ..../ .:;, ,~;l .:) ,:t ~l ~7' (IJ(~RD" C)EE~R(cl f<' F:) 0 H () >< 2: 1. ;;:~; ,;:f CL,C,~),I~\t,)(':T[R FL. :5:5 "7 E:. "/ :21. :~?; .4 (~IC:CEi".!T DE\." CC) 11:5 11TH ~3T E T I [:f~F~{~ VEr~DE FL, :5 ::; '/' .1.5 SCHWEITZER, OTTO R ")04 PL,~~,Z(::::, ST C L. E: {~,I~~ (.\1 ('~J T ERr: L. :5 ::5 7' ~:, .~::;l 4 (~1. 4 I~l CLEARWATER POWER SQUADRON 1000 CLEVELAND ST C:;L.E{',Fi:(I.)(iTE:R FL_ :5 ::~:; 7' .::1 .~::I (~t .5 .1 <=:1 SAOUL.1S, CHRISTOPHER H 9.5:5 L~:lur;~PI ST CL_Et',F~llJA TE:R FL_ ::5 :::; '}" ::1 .::1 .4 .~'~:1 .4 ~S HARBORVIEW INV II INC 1108 RIDGEGROVE DR 1:J(~ILt"'i HtlRBCJR F~~L :5 4- (. ~:~; ::5 :? () (.~l (;. '1 11".1C: DF~ CLEARWATER STORAGE CO 2106 HISPHAM RD STE B ~3(.~,F~(~,SO T {) FL.. :~;; (:f 2: 3 .1. .::1 E~, 1 ~.:~~ ENTE:L RADIOLOG\" ASSOCIATE:S MD PA PENSION PLAN & TRUST ATTN: DRAPKIN. R. 1003 HA\" ESPLANADE C:;LEt'lR(I,)(~ TEF~ F:CL.. 337 (,7- f 0 I Cj ::~;; ~; 7' I~) '/ ~;.. ...;~. "')' .... "T .i ,.". '"i ,"", GAULT, GE:OFFRE\" W II\I{'IRI)" I)EBh~rl K 14187 SOBE\" MEADOWS CT S '~)I r::~ (>, TOG (l C I~>I GREEN. DONNA M TRE 100l DF,~[hl :3T C:L_E(~F~V\IPI T[k~ FL ,::;, .~:::l () 7 () .~:' 6. ;s 1.~:::1 ::~) :':s 7' .~l ~:::I 4 .~~l :2 ~2 WARNER" COLL[[N F 2699 SEVILLE BLVD ~ 805 C L. [ r:~ R \1,1 (:~, T E h: FL.. ::537 (;."0] 11.:::.9 CHURCH OF THE ~:CONCIL.ER .JPCrl I.Jsn ~:s ;) 7' .~::I ~:l <::1. !:~. ~~ () CLEARWATER PRINTING INC :1.002 CiF~()VE ST (~: L. [;:. (:\ F~ VJ (:) T E: h~ F L :::5?; '7 .:' .~::I 4 .::1 :2 '9 hOf;:P I:S ,. GE:OI~GE r::: 2500 I',j BEL.CHE:R F~D CLE(~II?(I\I(~, T[F<~ FL. :3 ::~; '/" I:~I .:::1 :? (. ~? ~2: (1\ltiRD" Dr::.UF::I~)1 r<. F) () E: C) >< (;. () 6, F\:OLFE" BETT\( Ci C1U'Y'" P,L.BERT L 1;:372: DEL F~()13L.E~3 CL..E{'1I?I,-)(-..'! TE:R F~L. I'" ... C:L [(~IRI,I\IPI T[:F,~ F~'L ;::) ~s 7" E~ ~/ () I:~' () 6. TEF:: 3 ~5 7' .~:' o:~l l~l .41. ~:~ c ," TPITJC)r! 8:. F{\t'j T I... J ES I :5 ~5 'l (S, t,:l (.lll :~:~ ~; .4 IS ;3;3 1. (::1 r.) ;~3 ....... . . CDB Meeting Date: Case Number: Agenda Item: October 17, 2000 CRA 00-09-01 D6 CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION STAFF REPORT BACKGROUND INFORMATION: OWNERS: Trust for Rehabilitation and Nurturing Youth and Families, Inc. LOCATION: 100 North Greenwood Avenue REQUEST: An amendment to the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan from Low Density Residential and Medium/High Density Residential Categories to Public/Government Category. PLANS REVIEWED: Site plan submitted by Florida Design Consultants, Inc. SITE INFORMATION: PROPERTY SIZE: 3.48 acres DIMENSIONS OF SITE: 594 feet deep by 255 feet wide PROPERTY USE: Current uses: Proposed use: Vacant Public Transportation Facility ZONING DISTRICT: D, Downtown District PLAN CATEGORY: CBD, Central Business District Category Page 1 . . ADJACENT LAND USES: North: Office and single-family residential South: Office, retail and multi-family residential East: Office, retail and residential West: Vacant lot and residential development under construction CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIA TE VICINITY: The immediate vicinity is a mixture of residential, office and retail uses. ANALYSIS: The purpose of this request is to amend the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan to allow the development of a bus terminal at 100 North Greenwood Avenue for the use of Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority (PST A). A bus terminal is defined as a public transportation facility by the Community Development Code. A public transportation facility requires the site to be designated with the Public/Governmental use category of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan. The site proposed as a bus terminal by PST A is currently designated as Low and Mediurn/High Residential land use categories by the Redevelopment Plan and, therefore, does not permit the development of a bus terminal. PST A proposes a bus terminal on Greenwood Avenue to replace the existing terminal located at the northwest corner of Pierce Street and South Garden Avenue. There is a companion case which requests site plan approval of a proposed Flexible Development application as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Case FL 00- 08-34). Accordingly, this staff report evaluates the amendment to the Redevelopment Plan and the site plan issues are evaluated fully in the companion Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project staff report. The Countywide Plan Rules establish a plan category of "Central Business District" which allows cities to designate the boundaries of their urban center, prepare a specific CBD plan and allow downtown development with mixed uses at densities and intensities greater than in other parts of the City. Since at least 1976 when the first downtown plan was created, the City of Clearwater has identified the downtown as an urban center and the City's principal activity center. Over the years, there have been many downtown plans created with the most recent plan adopted in 1995 entitled "Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan." This Redevelopment Plan is the plan currently in effect and the plan for which an amendment is sought by PST A. The Redevelopment Plan establishes five general goals for the redevelopment of downtown. Within each goal, the Plan also establishes objectives and policies as detailed in Section VI. The proposal is evaluated against each goal, as follows: Page 2 . . 1. People Goal: To redevelop downtown Clearwater into a successful "people place" that attracts, retains, and inspires those of all ages and incomes to use and enjoy the community town center. Analysis: The objectives and policies of this goal highlight the need to encourage new residents to downtown, to encourage employment downtown through convenient transportation and parking, and to become the link among downtown, the City at large and the beach. The proposed PST A bus terminal location is in the middle of an area with existing and planned residential homes and the terminal will intrude into this residential neighborhood by using three local residential streets. The secondary impacts related to the proposed use (e.g. crime, noise, pollution, etc.) will detract from the residential redevelopment potential of the site and surrounding area. This is evidenced, in particular, by police reports for the existing downtown bus terminal which include an average of 27 calls for service per month (this year) for criminal activity (9-1-1, drunkenness, theft, battery, domestic violence, trespassing, fighting, etc.). The proposed bus terminal is located a substantial distance from the major downtown employers, thereby increasing the travel distance for most bus passengers or requiring a transfer at the terminal. The proposed location is a substantial distance from the center of downtown and available parking garages which could facilitate linkages between the City at large and other destinations such as the beach. In summary, the proposed amendment will allow a bus terminal in a location that will negatively affect existing residential owners and discourage new residential development. Further, the amendment will allow a terminal in a location that is not convenient for its passengers and will create a disincentive for bus travel due to its substantial distance from major employers. The proposed amendment is inconsistent with the People Goal of the Redevelopment Plan. 2. Movement Goal: To redevelop downtown Clearwater with an efficient, high quality, multi-modal movement system with supportive and visually positive terminal and transition facilities for all modes. Analysis: The objectives and policies of this goal establish the need for expanding the role of transit in the downtown. Specifically, objective 2 and its related policy is stated as follows on page VI-3 of the Redevelopment Plan: "Expand the role of transit downtown by linking the regional and local serving system as a means of reducing total reliance on the automobile. Improve the urban design qualities of the PST A facility to more positively relate to downtown. " The proposed amendment to relocate the PST A facility to this site is not consistent with the goal of expanding the use of transit by new passengers. The proposed location is not central to downtown and will require a longer walk by passengers from their employment to the terminal or require a transfer at the facility. The proposed location is physically unconnected with the Page 3 . . balance of downtown and will not contribute to the positive synergistic benefits of a downtown activity center. Although the proposal introduces a linkage with the Greyhound Bus Service and would create a new transit facility, the choice of location creates relatively larger disincentives for the general downtown area when balanced against the positive circumstances of a new facility and transit partner. The proposed amendment is inconsistent with the Movement Goal of the Redevelopment Plan. 3. Activity Goal: To redevelop downtown Clearwater to provide a broad and diverse set of activity centers that accommodate, stimulate and reinforce residing, working, visiting and purchasing in a great waterfront town setting. Analysis: The objectives and policies of this goal establish the need for diverse activities encouraging a 24-hour downtown. With new residential development located immediately to the west of this property and new townhouses planned two blocks to the south around town pond, this site's location and size of approximately 3.4 acres make it a prime location for additional residential uses. This site is in the center of several potential residential parcels and could be a part of the northern residential anchor of the downtown. This amendment would eliminate a major potential site for residential development and replace it with a bus terminal. The proposed amendment would introduce a commercial use with negative impacts into the center of a residential redevelopment area thereby discouraging other residential development from locating on the adjacent parcels. In addition to losing the residential potential, the proposed amendment would introduce a commercial use with external impacts into the center of a residential area. The use, design, operational characteristics and secondary impacts of the bus terminal are inconsistent with the residential character of the area and inconsistent with the Activity Goal of the Redevelopment Plan. 4. Amenity Goal: To redevelop downtown Clearwater to create and enhance a small town center "quality of life" that attracts and sustains a diversity of visual and use elements for cultural, entertainment, recreation and environmental experiences. Analysis: The objectives and policies of this goal establish the need to create the town pond to function both as a stormwater retention facility and as a park and to specifically act as a catalyst for residential development in its vicinity. As described above, the proposed amendment would remove a prime development parcel from residential development at a location that is within walking distance of the town pond with its proposed passive park features. The proposed amendment is inconsistent with the Amenity Goal of the Redevelopment Plan. 5. Opportunity Goal: To redevelop downtown Clearwater to attract and continue a process of value creation action that invests time, dollars, resources and creativity to enhance the value, tax base, image and quality of life for Clearwater. Analysis: The objectives and policies of this goal establish the need for key development parcels through the private market system while also encouraging public investments in amenities for the downtown. As described above, the proposed amendment would remove from the market a key residential development parcel. In addition, the public investments Page 4 . . proposed by PST A do not encourage an active vibrant downtown and do not add value to the downtown amenities. The secondary impacts related to this use (crime, loitering, etc.) will negatively impact the quality of life for residents and business owners. The proposed amendment is inconsistent with the Opportunity Goal of the Redevelopment Plan. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: An amendment to the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan is a significant issue and has impacts beyond the borders of the proposed amendment site. In particular, the location of a bus terminal can have a positive effect on a downtown given a location that is integrated with the downtown land uses, is close to its passengers, minimizes the off-site impacts and minimizes noise and air pollution. However, the proposed location is not related to the downtown land use pattern and does not provide the synergistic effects that a transit facility can provide for major downtown employers. In addition, the proposed location is internal to an existing and planned residential neighborhood and utilizes three residential streets for access. The proposed location removes from development potential a prime residential development parcel in close proximity to the town pond and its park amenity. When evaluated with the five goals of the Redevelopment Plan, the proposed amendment is inconsistent with all five goals of the Plan. The application and supporting materials were reviewed by the Development Review Committee on September 7,2000. Planning Staff recommends DENIAL of the request for an amendment to the Clearwater Redevelopment Plan from Low Density Residential and MediumlHigh Density Residential Categories to Public/Government Category, for the property located at 100 North Greenwood Avenue. Prepared by: Cyndi Hardin, Assistant Planning Director: l~~ ~j ~L (}:tt ATT ACHMENTS: Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity Location Map Future Land Use Map Zoning Atlas Map Application \\MS2IPDSIPlanning Deparlmenl\C D B\FLEX\Pending Applicalions\Greenwood N 100 PSTA\Greenwood N lOa STAFF REPORT CRPA.doc Page 5 ~ . Community Redevelopment Agency Agenda Cover Memorandum . Final Agenda Item # Meeting Date: Nov. 13, 2000 SUBJECT IRECOMMENDATION: t/Jn;/t;( It; /!J11t. Iff, 100/ Consider and make a recommendation to the City Commission on the request of the Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority to amend the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan from Low Density and Medium/High Residential Districts to Public/Government Category at 100 North Greenwood Avenue to allow the construction of a bus terminal. D and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. SUMMARY: Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority (PSTA) has requested an amendment to the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan to allow the construction of a bus terminal. The proposed location is on a city block of approximately 3.4 acres bounded by Greenwood Avenue on the east, Booth Avenue on the west, Grove Avenue on the north and Laura Street on the south. PSTA proposes this bus terminal to replace the existing terminal located at the northwest corner of Pierce Street and Garden Avenue. A bus terminal is defined as a public transportation facility which requires a Public/Governmental use category in the Redevelopment Plan. The Greenwood Avenue site is currently designated as Low and Medium/ High residential categories and, therefore, does not permit the development of a bus terminal. The Redevelopment Plan was adopted in 1995 and it established five districts of the redevelopment area, designated land use categories for all property within the redevelopment area, proposed catalyst projects to leverage private investment and prescribed five general goals for downtown redevelopment. The proposed bus terminal location is inconsistent with all of these major elements of the Redevelopment Plan (refer to the attached staff analysis). In summary, the Planning Department finds that the proposed amendment is inconsistent with the Redevelopment Plan for the following major reasons: . The proposed location is central to an existing and planned residential neighborhood and a bus terminal will intrude into this neighborhood with its traffic, noise, pollution and expected secondary impacts such as crime. . Should a bus terminal be located on the proposed site, the characteristics of the terminal will discourage new residential development and eliminate a major residential block from Reviewed by: Originating Oept: Costs N/A Legal Police Dept. NA Community Redevelopment Total - - Agency Budget Public Works NA UserOept. Funding Source: - - Purchasin NA DCM/ACM Community Redevelopment Capital Improvement Current Fiscal Year g - - Agency Risk Mgmt NA Other NA Attachments - CRA budget Operating - - Other Copy of FOOT Permit Appropriation Code: Submitted by: Application o None .ow- "'It Printed on recycled paper 2/98 Rev. redevelopment. There is a tca,ouse project under construction Alin a block from the proposed site and the proposrBalk townhouse development arou1'ftr town pond is located two blocks to the south. Introducing a commercial use with negative operational characteristics is inconsistent with this residential area. . The proposed location is not conveniently located for major employers and their customers and will likely result in a longer walk for passengers or additional transfers. In addition, the distant peripheral location does not promote the expanded use of transit for new customers nor does it encourage the linkages between downtown, the beach and other parts of the City. The ability to link downtown activities and downtown parking for transfer to the beach is eliminated through this distant location. . The Redevelopment Plan anticipates public investment to leverage private investment. While PSTA does propose a new terminal and a co-location with Greyhound Bus Lines, the choice of location creates more disincentives than the positive circumstances of the new facility. The Community Development Board heard this request at their public hearing of October 17, 2000. There was substantial public testimony by residents and property owners in opposition to the proposed amendment. There were no speakers in favor of the proposal. Reasons for the opposition to the terminal included the potential decline in property values, a decline in the quality of life for residents, the noise and pollution and their effect on the children at a nearby school, the potential crime associated with the terminal in close proximity to residents and inconsistency of the proposed use with the Redevelopment Plan. The Community Development Board unanimously recommended denial of the proposed amendment. In a related action at the same meeting, the Community Development Board reviewed the flexible site plan for the terminal and denied the site plan application. The Board's decision on the site plan is final unless the PSTA requests an appeal which would be heard by a hearing officer hired through the Department of Administrative Hearings. 2 . . CDB Meeting Date: Case Number: Agenda Item: October 17, 2000 CRA 00-09-01 D6 CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION STAFF REPORT BACKGROUND INFORMATION: OWNERS: Trust for Rehabilitation and Nurturing Youth and Families, Inc. LOCATION: 100 North Greenwood Avenue REQUEST: An amendment to the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan from Low Density Residential and MediurnlHigh Density Residential Categories to Public/Goverrunent Category. PLANS REVIEWED: Site plan submitted by Florida Design Consultants, Inc. SITE INFORMATION: PROPERTY SIZE: 3.4 8 acres DIMENSIONS OF SITE: 594 feet deep by 255 feet wide PROPERTY USE: Current uses: Proposed use: Vacant Public Transportation Facility ZONING DISTRICT: D, Downtown District PLAN CATEGORY: CBD, Central Business District Category Page 1 . . ADJACENT LAND USES: North: Office and single-family residential South: Office, retail and multi-family residential East: Office, retail and residential West: Vacant lot and residential development under construction CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIA TE VICINITY: The immediate vicinity is a mixture of residential, office and retail uses. ANALYSIS: The purpose of this request is to amend the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan to allow the development of a bus terminal at 100 North Greenwood Avenue for the use of Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority (PST A). A bus terminal is defined as a public transportation facility by the Community Development Code. A public transportation facility requires the site to be designated with the Public/Governmental use category of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan. The site proposed as a bus terminal by PST A is currently designated as Low and Medium/High Residential land use categories by the Redevelopment Plan and, therefore, does not permit the development of a bus terminal. PSTA proposes a bus terminal on Greenwood Avenue to replace the existing terminal located at the northwest corner of Pierce Street and South Garden Avenue. There is a companion case which requests site plan approval of a proposed Flexible Development application as a Comprehensive 10011 Redevelopment Project (Case FL 00- 08-34). Accordingly, this staff report evaluates the amendment to the Redevelopment Plan and the site plan issues are evaluated fully in the companion Comprehensive 10011 Redevelopment Project staff report. The Countywide Plan Rules establish a plan category of "Central Business District" which allows cities to designate the boundaries of their urban center, prepare a specific CBD plan and allow downtown development with mixed uses at densities and intensities greater than in other parts of the City. Since at least 1976 when the first downtown plan was created, the City of Clearwater has identified the downtown as an urban center and the City's principal activity center. Over the years, there have been many downtown plans created with the most recent plan adopted in 1995 entitled "Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan." This Redevelopment Plan is the plan currently in effect and the plan for which an amendment is sought by PSTA The Redevelopment Plan establishes five general goals for the redevelopment of downtown. Within each goal, the Plan also establishes objectives and policies as detailed in Section VI. The proposal is evaluated against each goal, as follows: Page 2 . . 1. People Goal: To redevelop downtown Clearwater into a successful "people place" that attracts, retains, and inspires those of all ages and incomes to use and enjoy the community town center. Analysis: The objectives and policies of this goal highlight the need to encourage new residents to downtown, to encourage employment downtown through convenient transportation and parking, and to become the link among downtown, the City at large and the beach. The proposed PST A bus terminal location is in the middle of an area with existing and planned residential homes and the terminal will intrude into this residential neighborhood by using three local residential streets. The secondary impacts related to the proposed use (e.g. crime, noise, pollution, etc.) will detract from the residential redevelopment potential of the site and surrounding area. Tills is evidenced, in particular, by police reports for the existing downtown bus terminal which include an average of 27 calls for service per month (this year) for criminal activity (9-1-1, drunkenness, theft, battery, domestic violence, trespassing, fighting, etc.). The proposed bus terminal is located a substantial distance from the major downtown employers, thereby increasing the travel distance for most bus passengers or requiring a transfer at the terminal. The proposed location is a substantial distance from the center of downtown and available parking garages which could facilitate linkages between the City at large and other destinations such as the beach. In summary, the proposed amendment will allow a bus terminal in a location that will negatively affect existing residential owners and discourage new residential development. Further, the amendment will allow a terminal in a location that is not convenient for its passengers and will create a disincentive for bus travel due to its substantial distance from major employers. The proposed amendment is inconsistent with the People Goal of the Redevelopment Plan. 2. Movement Goal: To redevelop downtown Clearwater with an efficient, high quality, multi-modal movement system with supportive and visually positive terminal and transition facilities for all modes. Analysis: The objectives and policies of this goal establish the need for expanding the role of transit in the downtown. Specifically, objective 2 and its related policy is stated as follows on page VI-3 of the Redevelopment Plan: "Expand the role of transit downtown by linking the regional and local serving system as a means of reducing total reliance on the automobile. Improve the urban design qualities of the PST A facility to more positively relate to downtown." The proposed amendment to relocate the PST A facility to this site is not consistent with the goal of expanding the use of transit by new passengers. The proposed location is not central to downtown and will require a longer walk by passengers from their employment to the terminal or require a transfer at the facility. The proposed location is physically unconnected with the Page 3 . . balance of downtown and will not contribute to the positive synergistic benefits of a downtown activity center. Although the proposal introduces a linkage with the Greyhound Bus Service and would create a new transit facility, the choice of location creates relatively larger disincentives for the general downtown area when balanced against the positive circumstances of a new facility and transit partner. The proposed amendment is inconsistent with the Movement Goal of t~e Redevelopment Plan. 3. Activity Goal: To redevelop downtown Clearwater to provide a broad and diverse set of activity centers that accommodate, stimulate and reinforce residing, working, visiting and purchasing in a great waterfront town setting. Analysis: The objectives and policies of this goal establish the need for diverse activities encouraging a 24-hour downtown. With new residential development located immediately to the west of this property and new townhouses planned two blocks to the south around town pond, this site's location and size of approximately 3.4 acres make it a prime location for additional residential uses. This site is in the center of several potential residential parcels and could be a part of the northern residential anchor of the downtown. This amendment would eliminate a major potential site for residential development and replace it with a bus terminal. The proposed amendment would introduce a commercial use with negative impacts into the center of a residential redevelopment area thereby discouraging other residential development from locating on the adjacent parcels. In addition to losing the residential potential, the proposed amendment would introduce a commercial use with external impacts into the center of a residential area. The use, design, operational characteristics and secondary impacts of the bus terminal are inconsistent with the residential character of the area and inconsistent with the Activity Goal of the Redevelopment Plan. 4. Amenity Goal: To redevelop downtown Clearwater to create and enhance a small town center "quality of life" that attracts and sustains a diversity of visual and use elements for cultural, entertainment, recreation and environmental experiences. Analysis: The objectives and policies of this goal establish the need to create the town pond to function both as a stormwater retention facility and as a park and to specifically act as a catalyst for residential development in its vicinity. As described above, the proposed amendment would remove a prime development parcel from residential development at a location that is within walking distance of the town pond with its proposed passive park features. The proposed amendment is inconsistent with the Amenity Goal of the Redevelopment Plan. 5. Opportunity Goal: To redevelop downtown Clearwater to attract and continue a process of value creation action that invests time, dollars, resources and creativity to enhance the value, tax base, image and quality of life for Clearwater. Analysis: The objectives and policies of this goal establish the need for key development parcels through the private market system while also encouraging public investments in amenities for the downtown. As described above, the proposed amendment would remove from the market a key residential development parcel. In addition, the public investments Page 4 . . proposed by PST A do not encourage an active vibrant downtown and do not add value to the downtown amenities. The secondary impacts related to this use (crime, loitering, etc.) will negatively impact the quality of life for residents and business owners. The proposed amendment is inconsistent with the Opportunity Goal ofthe Redevelopment Plan. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: An amendment to the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan is a significant issue and has impacts beyond the borders of the proposed amendment site. In particular, the location of a bus terminal can have a positive effect on a downtown given a location that is integrated with the downtown land uses, is close to its passengers, minimizes the off-site impacts and minimizes noise and air pollution. However, the proposed location is not related to the downtown land use pattern and does not provide the synergistic effects that a transit facility can provide for major downtown employers. In addition, the proposed location is internal to an existing and planned residential neighborhood and utilizes three residential streets for access. The proposed location removes from development potential a prime residential development parcel in close proximity to the town pond and its park amenity. When evaluated with the five goals of the Redevelopment Plan, the proposed amendment is inconsistent with all five goals of the Plan. The application and supporting materials were reviewed by the Development Review Committee on September 7,2000. Planning Staff recommends DENIAL of the request for an amendment to the Clearwater Redevelopment Plan from Low Density Residential and Medium/High Density Residential Categories to Public/Government Category, for the property located at 100 North Greenwood Avenue. Prepared by: Cyndi Hardin, Assistant Planning Director: ~~'1 ~J~ (}rr ATTACHMENTS: Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity Location Map Future Land Use Map Zoning Atlas Map Application I\MS2IPDSIPlanning Department\C D BIFLEXlPending AppbcatlOnslGreenwood N 100 PSTAIGreenwood N 100 STAFF REPORT CRPA.doc Page 5 . . CDB Meeting Date: October 17. 2000 Case Number: CRA 00-09-01 Agenda Item: D6 CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION STAFF REPORT BACKGROUND INFORMATION: OWNERS: Trust for Rehabilitation and Nurturing Youth and Families, Inc. LOCATION: 100 North Greenwood Avenue REQUEST: An amendment to the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan from Low Density Residential and Medium/High Density Residential Categories to Public/Government Category. PLANS REVIEWED: Site plan submitted by Florida Design Consultants, Inc. SITE INFORMATION: PROPERTY SIZE: 3 .48 acres DIMENSIONS OF SITE: 594 feet deep by 255 feet wide PROPERTY USE: Current uses: Proposed use: Vacant Public Transportation Facility ZONING DISTRICT: D, Downtown District PLAN CATEGORY: CBD, Central Business District Category Page 1 . . ADJACENT LAND USES: North: Office and single-family residential South: Office, retail and multi-family residential East: Office, retail and residential West: Vacant lot and residential development under construction CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIA TE VICINITY: The immediate vicinity is a mixture of residential, office and retail uses. ANALYSIS: The purpose of this request is to amend the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan to allow the development of a bus terminal at 100 North Greenwood Avenue for the use of Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority (PST A). A bus terminal is defined as a public transportation facility by the Community Development Code. A public transportation facility requires the site to be designated with the Public/Governmental use category of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan. The site proposed as a bus terminal by PST A is currently designated as Low and Medium/High Residential land use categories by the Redevelopment Plan and, therefore, does not permit the development of a bus terminal. PST A proposes a bus terminal on Greenwood Avenue to replace the existing terminal located at the northwest corner of Pierce Street and South Garden Avenue. There is a companion case which requests site plan approval of a proposed Flexible Development application as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Case FL 00- 08-34). Accordingly, this staff report evaluates the amendment to the Redevelopment Plan and the site plan issues are evaluated fully in the companion Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project staff report. The Countywide Plan Rules establish a plan category of "Central Business District" which allows cities to designate the boundaries of their urban center, prepare a specific CBD plan and allow downtown development with mixed uses at densities and intensities greater than in other parts of the City. Since at least 1976 when the first downtown plan was created, the City of Clearwater has identified the downtown as an urban center and the City's principal activity center. Over the years, there have been many downtown plans created with the most recent plan adopted in 1995 entitled "Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan." This Redevelopment Plan is the plan currently in effect and the plan for which an amendment is sought by PST A The Redevelopment Plan establishes five general goals for the redevelopment of downtown. Within each goal, the Plan also establishes objectives and policies as detailed in Section VI. The proposal is evaluated against each goal, as follows: Page 2 . . 1. People Goal: To redevelop downtown Clearwater into a successful "people place" that attracts, retains, and inspires those of all ages and incomes to use and enjoy the community town center. Analysis: The objectives and policies of this goal highlight the need to encourage new residents to downtown, to encourage employment downtown through convenient transportation and parking, and to become the link among downtown, the City at large and the beach. The proposed PST A bus terminal location is in the middle of an area with existing and planned residential homes and the terminal will intrude into this residential neighborhood by using three local residential streets. The secondary impacts related to the proposed use (e.g. crime, noise, pollution, etc.) will detract from the residential redevelopment potential of the site and surrounding area. This is evidenced, in particular, by police reports for the existing downtown bus terminal which include an average of 27 calls for service per month (this year) for criminal activity (9-1-1, drunkenness, theft, battery, domestic violence, trespassing, fighting, etc.). The proposed bus terminal is located a substantial distance from the major downtown employers, thereby increasing the travel distance for most bus passengers or requiring a transfer at the terminal. The proposed location is a substantial distance from the center of downtown and available parking garages which could facilitate linkages between the City at large and other destinations such as the beach. In summary, the proposed amendment will allow a bus terminal in a location that will negatively affect existing residential owners and discourage new residential development. Further, the amendment will allow a terminal in a location that is not convenient for its passengers and will create a disincentive for bus travel due to its substantial distance from major employers. The proposed amendment is inconsistent with the People Goal of the Redevelopment Plan. 2. Movement Goal: To redevelop downtown Clearwater with an efficient, high quality, multi-modal movement system with supportive and visually positive terminal and transition facilities for all modes. Analysis: The objectives and policies of this goal establish the need for expanding the role of transit in the downtown. Specifically, objective 2 and its related policy is stated as follows on page VI-3 of the Redevelopment Plan: "Expand the role of transit downtown by linking the regional and local serving system as a means of reducing total reliance on the automobile. Improve the urban design qualities of the PST A facility to more positively relate to downtown. " The proposed amendment to relocate the PST A facility to this site is not consistent with the goal of expanding the use of transit by new passengers. The proposed location is not central to downtown and will require a longer walk by passengers from their employment to the terminal or require a transfer at the facility. The proposed location is physically unconnected with the Page 3 . . balance of downtown and will not contribute to the positive synergistic benefits of a downtown activity center. Although the proposal introduces a linkage with the Greyhound Bus Service and would create a new transit facility, the choice of location creates relatively larger disincentives for the general downtown area when balanced against the positive circumstances of a new facility and transit partner. The proposed amendment is inconsistent with the Movement Goal of the Redevelopment Plan. 3. Activity Goal: To redevelop downtown Clearwater to provide a broad and diverse set of activity centers that accommodate, stimulate and reinforce residing, working, visiting and purchasing in a great waterfront town setting. Analysis: The objectives and policies of this goal establish the need for diverse activities encouraging a 24-hour downtown. With new residential development located immediately to the west of this property and new townhouses planned two blocks to the south around town pond, this site's location and size of approximately 3.4 acres make it a prime location for additional residential uses. This site is in the center of several potential residential parcels and could be a part of the northern residential anchor of the downtown. This amendment would eliminate a major potential site for residential development and replace it with a bus terminal. The proposed amendment would introduce a commercial use with negative impacts into the center of a residential redevelopment area thereby discouraging other residential development from locating on the adjacent parcels. In addition to losing the residential potential, the proposed amendment would introduce a commercial use with external impacts into the center of a residential area. The use, design, operational characteristics and secondary impacts of the bus terminal are inconsistent with the residential character of the area and inconsistent with the Activity Goal of the Redevelopment Plan. 4. Amenity Goal: To redevelop downtown Clearwater to create and enhance a small town center "quality of life" that attracts and sustains a diversity of visual and use elements for cultural, entertainment, recreation and environmental experiences. Analysis: The objectives and policies of this goal establish the need to create the town pond to function both as a stormwater retention facility and as a park and to specifically act as a catalyst for residential development in its vicinity. As described above, the proposed amendment would remove a prime development parcel from residential development at a location that is within walking distance of the town pond with its proposed passive park features. The proposed amendment is inconsistent with the Amenity Goal of the Redevelopment Plan. 5. Opportunity Goal: To redevelop downtown Clearwater to attract and continue a process of value creation action that invests time, dollars, resources and creativity to enhance the value, tax base, image and quality of life for Clearwater. Analysis: The objectives and policies of this goal establish the need for key development parcels through the private market system while also encouraging public investments in amenities for the downtown. As described above, the proposed amendment would remove from the market a key residential development parcel. In addition, the public investments Page 4 . . proposed by PST A do not encourage an active vibrant downtown and do not add value to the downtown amenities. The secondary impacts related to this use (crime, loitering, etc.) will negatively impact the quality of life for residents and business owners. The proposed amendment is inconsistent with the Opportunity Goal of the Redevelopment Plan. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: An amendment to the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan is a significant issue and has impacts beyond the borders of the proposed amendment site. In particular, the location of a bus terminal can have a positive effect on a downtown given a location that is integrated with the downtown land uses, is close to its passengers, minimizes the off-site impacts and minimizes noise and air pollution. However, the proposed location is not related to the downtown land use pattern and does not provide the synergistic effects that a transit facility can provide for major downtown employers. In addition, the proposed location is internal to an existing and planned residential neighborhood and utilizes three residential streets for access. The proposed location removes from development potential a prime residential development parcel in close proximity to the town pond and its park amenity. When evaluated with the five goals of the Redevelopment Plan, the proposed amendment is inconsistent with all five goals of the Plan. The application and supporting materials were reviewed by the Development Review Committee on September 7,2000. Planning Staff recommends DENIAL of the request for an amendment to the Clearwater Redevelopment Plan from Low Density Residential and Mediurn/High Density Residential Categories to Public/Government Category, for the property located at 100 North Greenwood Avenue. Prepared by: Cyndi Hardin, Assistant Planning Director: ~~~} ~L cA1t ATTACHMENTS: Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity Location Map Future Land Use Map Zoning Atlas Map Application \ IJvfS2IPDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEXlPending ApplicationslGreenwood N 100 PSTA IGreenwood N 1 00 STAFF REPORT CRPA.doc Page 5 . . .. CDB Meeting Date: October 17, 2000 Case Number: CRA 00-09-01 Agenda Item: D6 ~~liQ) it 7l~ - I~~I CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION STAFF REPORT BACKGROUND INFORMATION: OWNERS: Trust for Rehabilitation and Nurturing Youth and Families, Inc. LOCA TION: 100 North Greenwood Avenue REQUEST: An amendment to the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan from Low Density Residential and Mediurn/High Density Residential Categories to Public/Government Category. PLANS REVIEWED: Site plan submitted by Florida Design Consultants, Inc. SITE INFORMATION: PROPERTY SIZE: 3.48 acres DIMENSIONS OF SITE: 594 feet deep by 255 feet wide PROPERTY USE: Current uses: Proposed use: Vacant Public Transportation Facility ZONING DISTRICT: D, Downtown District PLAN CATEGORY: CBD, Central Business District Category Page 1 . . ADJACENT LAND USES: North: Office and single-family residential South: Office, retail and multi-family residential East: Office, retail and residential West: Vacant lot and residential development under construction CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIA TE VICINITY: The immediate vicinity is a mixture of residential, office and retail uses. ANALYSIS: The purpose of this request is to amend the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan to allow the development of a bus terminal at 100 North Greenwood Avenue for the use of Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority (PST A). A bus terminal is defined as a public transportation facility by the Community Development Code. A public transportation facility requires the site to be designated with the Public/Governmental use category of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan. The site proposed as a bus terminal by PSTA is currently designated as Low and Medium/High Residential land use categories by the Redevelopment Plan and, therefore, does not permit the development of a bus terminal. PSTA proposes a bus terminal on Greenwood Avenue to replace the existing terminal located at the northwest corner of Pierce Street and South Garden Avenue. There is a companion case which requests site plan approval of a proposed Flexible Development application as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Case FL 00- 08-34). Accordingly, this staff report evaluates the amendment to the Redevelopment Plan and the site plan issues are evaluated fully in the companion Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Proj ect staff report. The Countywide Plan Rules establish a plan category of "Central Business District" which allows cities to designate the boundaries of their urban center, prepare a specific CBD plan and allow downtown development with mixed uses at densities and intensities greater than in other parts of the City. Since at least 1976 when the first downtown plan was created, the City of Clearwater has identified the downtown as an urban center and the City's principal activity center. Over the years, there have been many downtown plans created with the most recent plan adopted in 1995 entitled "Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan." This Redevelopment Plan is the plan currently in effect and the plan for which an amendment is sought by PST A. The Redevelopment Plan establishes five general goals for the redevelopment of downtown. Within each goal, the Plan also establishes objectives and policies as detailed in Section VI. The proposal is evaluated against each goal, as follows: Page 2 . . 1. People Goal: To redevelop downtown Clearwater into a successful "people place" that attracts, retains, and inspires those of all ages and incomes to use and enj oy the community town center. Analysis: The objectives and policies of this goal highlight the need to encourage new residents to downtown, to encourage employment downtown through convenient transportation and parking, and to become the link among downtown, the City at large and the beach. The proposed PST A bus terminal location is in the middle of an area with existing and planned residential homes and the terminal will intrude into this residential neighborhood by using three local residential streets. The secondary impacts related to the proposed use (e.g. crime, noise, pollution, etc.) will detract from the residential redevelopment potential of the site and surrounding area. This is evidenced, in particular, by police reports for the existing downtown bus terminal which include an average of 27 calls for service per month (this year) for criminal activity (9-1-1, drunkenness, theft, battery, domestic violence, trespassing, fighting, etc.). The proposed bus terminal is located a substantial distance from the major downtown employers, thereby increasing the travel distance for most bus passengers or requiring a transfer at the terminal. The proposed location is a substantial distance from the center of downtown and available parking garages which could facilitate linkages between the City at large and other destinations such as the beach. In summary, the proposed amendment will allow a bus terminal in a location that will negatively affect existing residential owners and discourage new residential development. Further, the amendment will allow a terminal in a location that is not convenient for its passengers and will create a disincentive for bus travel due to its substantial distance from major employers. The proposed amendment is inconsistent with the People Goal of the Redevelopment Plan. 2. Movement Goal: To redevelop downtown Clearwater with an efficient, high quality, multi-modal movement system with supportive and visually positive terminal and transition facilities for all modes. Analysis: The objectives and policies of this goal establish the need for expanding the role of transit in the downtown. Specifically, objective 2 and its related policy is stated as follows on page VI-3 of the Redevelopment Plan: "Expand the role of transit downtown by linking the regional and local serving system as a means of reducing total reliance on the automobile. Improve the urban design qualities of the PST A facility to more positively relate to downtown." The proposed amendment to relocate the PST A facility to this site is not consistent with the goal of expanding the use of transit by new passengers. The proposed location is not central to downtown and will require a longer walk by passengers from their employment to the terminal or require a transfer at the facility. The proposed location is physically unconnected with the Page 3 . . balance of downtown and will not contribute to the positive synergistic benefits of a downtown activity center. Although the proposal introduces a linkage with the Greyhound Bus Service and would create a new transit facility, the choice of location creates relatively larger disincentives for the general downtown area when balanced against the positive circumstances of a new facility and transit partner. The proposed amendment is inconsistent with the Movement Goal of the Redevelopment Plan. 3. Activity Goal: To redevelop downtown Clearwater to provide a broad and diverse set of activity centers that accommodate, stimulate and reinforce residing, working, visiting and purchasing in a great waterfront town setting. Analysis: The objectives and policies of this goal establish the need for diverse activities encouraging a 24-hour downtown. With new residential development located immediately to the west of this property and new townhouses planned two blocks to the south around town pond, this site's location and size of approximately 3.4 acres make it a prime location for additional residential uses. This site is in the center of several potential residential parcels and could be a part of the northern residential anchor of the downtown. This amendment would eliminate a major potential site for residential development and replace it with a bus terminal. The proposed amendment would introduce a commercial use with negative impacts into the center of a residential redevelopment area thereby discouraging other residential development from locating on the adjacent parcels. In addition to losing the residential potential, the proposed amendment would introduce a commercial use with external impacts into the center of a residential area. The use, design, operational characteristics and secondary impacts of the bus terminal are inconsistent with the residential character of the area and inconsistent with the Activity Goal of the Redevelopment Plan. 4. Amenity Goal: To redevelop downtown Clearwater to create and enhance a small town center "quality of life" that attracts and sustains a diversity of visual and use elements for cultural, entertainment, recreation and environmental experiences. Analysis: The objectives and policies of this goal establish the need to create the town pond to function both as a stormwater retention facility and as a park and to specifically act as a catalyst for residential development in its vicinity. As described above, the proposed amendment would remove a prime development parcel from residential development at a location that is within walking distance of the town pond with its proposed passive park features. The proposed amendment is inconsistent with the Amenity Goal of the Redevelopment Plan. 5. Opportunity Goal: To redevelop downtown Clearwater to attract and continue a process of value creation action that invests time, dollars, resources and creativity to enhance the value, tax base, image and quality of life for Clearwater. Analysis: The objectives and policies of this goal establish the need for key development parcels through the private market system while also encouraging public investments in amenities for the downtown. As described above, the proposed amendment would remove from the market a key residential development parcel. In addition, the public investments Page 4 . . proposed by PST A do not encourage an active vibrant downtown and do not add value to the downtown amenities. The secondary impacts related to this use (crime, loitering, etc.) will negatively impact the quality of life for residents and business owners. The proposed amendment is inconsistent with the Opportunity Goal of the Redevelopment Plan. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: An amendment to the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan is a significant issue and has impacts beyond the borders of the proposed amendment site. In particular, the location of a bus terminal can have a positive effect on a downtown given a location that is integrated with the downtown land uses, is close to its passengers, minimizes the off-site impacts and minimizes noise and air pollution. However, the proposed location is not related to the downtown land use pattern and does not provide the synergistic effects that a transit facility can provide for major downtown employers. In addition, the proposed location is internal to an existing and planned residential neighborhood and utilizes three residential streets for access. The proposed location removes from development potential a prime residential development parcel in close proximity to the town pond and its park amenity. When evaluated with the five goals of the Redevelopment Plan, the proposed amendment is inconsistent with all five goals of the Plan. The application and supporting materials were reviewed by the Development Review Committee on September 7,2000. Planning Staff recommends DENIAL of the request for an amendment to the Clearwater Redevelopment Plan from Low Density Residential and Medium/High Density Residential Categories to Public/Government Category, for the property located at 100 North Greenwood Avenue. Prepared by: Cyndi Hardin, Assistant Planning Director: ~~. '1 ~jL Cktt ATTACHMENTS: Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity Location Map Future Land Use Map Zoning Atlas Map Application IIMS2\PDS\Planning DepartmentlC D B\FLEX\Pending ApplicationslGreenwood N 100PSTAIGreenwood N 100 STAFF REPORT CRPA.doc Page 5 ~ TRANSMISSION VERIFICATION R~ TIME 10/10/2000 12:08 DATE, TIME FAX NO./NAME DURATION PAGE(S) RESULT MODE 10110 12: 02 97231421 00:05:50 14 OK STANDARD ECM . t I 0 <6 (i")-rove;' S hee-r Cl f .J(t,h~-- "() F L33f] 5.5" 0c:\-ckJE y III ~000 J.,~ , CiLA 00 ,04..V I RAlph S+oY\e J ?LHY1Y\)V19 ~\~iEcto t\f'I I'I'[ C / "'-1:)) ~..... IV "un '( Clf\J E' -:)e-'",/V t ce ,X)L) \ 101 nq ~lA y, n If' q 1? E ~)' ~)'t10 Yl~ I 0 0 Sov+h }fkry -\-{ e (-t \J E YI U ( (~\Gf\QWRtfo FL .j'3'75~ / <])e: Al )/\.11 5 tOl1 E ~ -ryt <f~re(~nc€ +0 ~hf' lcquG5t ''oU) --=r31A +0 <:-DV\5+6VC'~ It .fAc~\ ~1'Cj L:Y\-- lOO N G'Y<2EV\C-l)Ood f}VeVlUC'j !j>klt5 ~ A CC'Ep t- )Ill Y apf'1)'i:, ( -I- (0 V\ "f' ~ his t'L4Yl. , A.qer cJ I SOUS5'1Ir\Cj-t11 I s, V"CI''''S f1 1 w: -t h \;" CJl \ _ y\.( Iqn ben"'> I lf5~cl<"vl~ it Y\ d t>>'o'Pe-t-t'1. "uJV1,e'6;- I Vl +~'1 s c~Y\e\'Al A'/CA .l- MV(- coV\c:~vJe-d +M'~' It \9 thE~ c:y:mG-"/'fT\ O?\'V\;'''''V\ +\v:I~ ..\.\\(:; ?LAY1 \" S lM??"O ?y\ 1t+E' · \.. 'me (~'"(E? (1 (9 be- iV1q Upq1AdE'J If}?~d>1 L) liVId -lhls ~dd,~\dVl ~~U\d 6es+'1()'j +hE -ro9)'(?S IlIAd/? ~.. 11c-~n)q\\l\q hf:+tVu +'iAIT(c +A')(\cS. buse-s C ,. .\ I ) / ) ~U1V\E S' A-Y10 -t1fH')<6 IE YrrS .~() ,f! dEs (I'A\o\E' Y\E \ 9h bo-(kvo d \ g Y'lot-- w~ -Pn E- f'e of\ f he 'it: u,)ft'Vl l' '3" "lVl ~ \i :~ , ve . ffirlc 5b fV1 \5 -h Ut.+ i () V) ot + 1-1 t 5 ,?<10?E~+~ (s +06 h19\i1 +0 bE v5ed '~G'Y +-VIlS f\J'O)Ose mf VA-\LJ<2 c~: SUYiOVv\.cJ 1)/19 ~lJfc-)"41 E s LucJU {d c1C'Cfc"':A<;;-( . (; 5 A- f}l 1-1 c1 ('1 <2' \ ~'( A--~ ;6 (\ yvcr+ lyE D +' e\ e: \ynXU1--+ 0/ A \lId A;+ EY cO ',s C' U '5 '5 I '1 ~+\n i 5' U'> : tn DthGb 0 ~ I V\ S \ g ltt\ l ,~ I S \iY\~ .Eco YVI Y'\CC 110'1 + ( '6 \1 -\-\U=r\- +0e0oo,,?o-s'ed \A}td5~~-v* be ~3A\JE(J '~crf ~ ''1\<31' f. (-torr o~ C~+-e S+:1UC.t-Ul C ~ \Vll S A-YE!::} LUO \.J \ d be \ r / \-'"' -\Ii'~ _ \ . I : A~\ Gtcc:llG:Vl \-- ~,'-r~ .-t--<5i j\ S<::'c vs l\t E- /}T-\I\,,\.{)~fV\~'W'E v\ e c J E cl ~~o <( -\1r\ c::- C \ E:J\- --l LUH -+ E. ,( 'VLl l0l \" c L\:tn' PrTC\., OCT I h 2{D) PLANNING & DtvELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF CLEARWATER L . ?"Jl .c . / . -\ f .~ vr E:~'(\t- Lo ('tJ [(WI 0-\' -+h 0 t ( by A-1f tjl'Yllq h.1: be tJsed rYlef( ~ Af?~o-p<"njt.A-e\ ~ ~6-r I ive \~ ?\Y''fbs <:::<5 'Such A S CoV\c E--r+Sj A'1} 5~ '5 / -+-A-yv'l ~ l ~ [-\c-t- 1.$ (+(e: s) ~d r{ ~c:i 6- A-\- {(')'Y) ^Wop<o ~ E ~{ ~\.G- WrH-e.y ~'YaYl~ . lYvt-nR qoJ ~.( C{Ou.( OoV\-s lde:Yf++toVl ~ <Res'Pc:ct~utl~ 9ubyY)~ {.fEd ) ~1 1~'tL ~ ~l\.~ N~)\j~'( f+{-t'RhJ-WAQN~R (CecJ.. {6fn (aD Preschool through 1 ~ October 17, 2000 Planning and Development Services City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758 RE: PINELLAS SUNCOAST TRANSIT AUTHORITY Dear Sir or Madam: I wish to let the board know that we strongly oppose the relocation of the bus terminal to the new proposed location at 100 N. Greenwood Ave. Clearwater Academy International is a private school from kindergarten through 12th grade. Several years ago we dreamed of building our very own brand new school. That dream came true a few years ago and we now have a very professional and aesthetic building in downtown Clearwater. The children that attend our school can safely play outside. The safety and well being of our children could be jeopardized tremendously if the relocation of the bus terminal to this proposed site is accepted. Our clientele is children. A bus terminal so close to our school would create a very unpleasant and dangerous environment. A bus terminal in a low and medium density residential housing area, is not the proper location for the bus terminal. The bus terminal would bring pollution, concentrated fumes and a very smelly environment to a fairly clean air area. This proposed new location does not fit at all with the area. We have heard reports that the Clearwater Police are called to the bus depot on an average of 5 times a week. Having young vulnerable children right next door to such a setting would cause risk to our children. This proposal is putting our center at risk of possibly losing business, because parents would not feel that their children are in a clean, sane and safe environment. We build our school with the knowledge that this was an ideal environment for the children we serve. It was close to downtown but yet in a residential setting. I urge the board to decline the application of the Pinellas Suncoast Transit authority. S ,in cerely, .' "2' _.- ,~ 1 l \ / i ""'\ ,I I /\" '~../\.... ' / --- ...............-............. \.Jeffrey Feldman Treasurer PG OD . 0 '6 ~ ?;~ vi~l'~ Db ,O'-T ~Ol A Higher Standard in Education FilE COpy 801 Drew Street. Clearwater, Florida 33755-4517 (727) 446-1722. FAX (727) 443-5252 Clearwater Academy Inlernotioool is 0 lIon-profil, fox'exempt corporation, and admits slUdef1f5 of ony [a<e, color and naliOllol or ethnic origin. Cleorwaler Academy Intemotional is licensed by Appliell Scholastics'M to use 1he edumliom:d technolo!l'( of L Ron Hubbard. Ajlplied Scholastics and ltle Applied Scholastics logo ore Il'Odemorks and service marks owned by A,ssl)(iotion For Bener liviog and fdlKotion and ore used with its permi~~ion LAURA STREET TOWNHOMES L.C. Building Project 1999-2000 Construction and Sales Office Laura Street, Clearwater PineUas County Florida, U.S.A. (727) 449-9899 tel. (727) 449-9969 fax www.LauraStreet.com info@LauraStreet.com Mailing Address P.O. Box 1728 CI~ater, FL 33757-1728 l' North Dr_51 ~ ~ tl .. ~ Ii! 0- Z Z .. ~ GlOVe 51 Laura .. t Street :;; Townhom8ll Z ~ Laura 51 Cleveland 51 From Cleveland St. turn N onto N M}rtJe Ave., then turn E onto Laura St., Construction/Sales Office located in trailer E ofN Prospect Ave. . . Planning and Development Services City of Oearwater P.O. Box 4748, Oearwater, FL 33758 fr~:!, (o( /1/00 11.;C (' 00 rYflfj October 10,2000 RE: PINELLAS SUNCOAST TRANSIT AUTHORITY Dear Planner & Developer, I wish to let the board know that we strongly oppose the relocation of the bus terminal to the new proposed location at 100 N. Greenwood Ave. We are developing a piece of property to the West of the proposed new site. We have approved plans to build 18 brand new town homes. This project is fitting with the City of Oearwater and Main Street to revitalize our downtown. We want to bring people downtown to shop and LIVE. A bus terminal underneath their bedroom window would be a huge detriment to us being able to sell these town homes. This relocation would bring air, noise pollution, concentrated fumes to a residential area. This site is designated for low and medium density residential housing, this proposed new location does not fit at all with the area. This particular area has seen a huge improvement in the last few years. A new school, counseling center and Walgreens have improved the area tremendously. We are seeing an increased interest in our downtown for upgrading and bringing more amenities doWntown, a bus terminal in a residential area is not. This proposal is putting a huge burden on our construction and in actuality if this was permitted it would most likely put a stop to the construction of the town homes. This would in fact set the city revit3lization program back by stopping the kind of constructiob that would enhance the downtown of Oearwater. I respectfully request that the board turn down the request of the Pinellas Suncoast Transit authority. PLr 00, og ..?~. () ~'f51r~I' .1 /(1 p-A (1), J t? - 0 I I ')-L'/. {l/L. ap/~.~'~' / ~ l . .- . uis Cour~er . /-' \ Bill LazaronPJ "---~ FILE COpy FRO REVS. MACK AND AMY SIGMON ~ FAX NO. 4469091 Of THE: Rc v~ C'O~ .:::, q;. C'",. ~ (~ U j:) PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH IN THE USA 915 DREW STREET CLEARWATER. FLORIDA ~ JJ1f6 Conununity Development Board Clearwater City HaJJ P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33757 Re: Proposed Bus Tenninal at 100 N. Greenwood Ave., Clearwater Dear Community Development Board Members: This letter is to express our church's vigorous objections to relocating the Clearwater Bus Terminal to 100 N. Greenwood Ave. This location is directly across the street from our church. We have been here serving the North Greenwood community for thirty-three years. The noise and pollution would directlye:ffect the life of our church. The continuous loud noise and vibration would make it difficult for us to conduct our worship services and feDowship events. Debris and both foot and auto traffic to and from the terminal would make keeping our property clean and secure practically impossible. In addition to the difficulties it presents to our church, for over thirty years we've housed one of the largest Head Start programs in the county. There are presently fifty-five children enrolled in our program. The building where the children's classrooms are located is on the side of our property that would be right next to the terminal The children's playground would overlook the terminal. These :fifty-five children and their teachers would be constantly exposed to loud noise, deep vibration, and dangerous air pollution. With the increase in people coming and going next door, we believe the children will also be in danger from strangers surrounding the church. Just as it would be ill-advised to put a bus tenninal next to an elementary school, we believe it would be disastrous to locate one next to a large preschool program that serves the families of our conununity. For these rea~ons, we strongly oppose moving a bus terminal to the proposed location on N. Greenwood Ave. If you have any questions, please contact the Rev. Amy Sigmon (church: 446-0946; home: 446-9091). - r--"-:::: 1 .r'~.-....\. Ir-..:J. ~'~ rr?" q \\;'1 '\e::J ;--", "\ ' . .~L-'l \-:JI~\\\ r- 11) . \ W" \j7.f:. \ \J lL::=J I \, .', ,: ;~=~___:::~='_U_____~l', \ \ '. l ~ 1 ; ! :-~ rYI:nr'j ~ Jl; f \.i L.,~Ul.. Sincerely, ~ ~)4I~ The Rev. Amy S. Sigmon Pastor L. ~;":'.-~; ?~ \-.JEvELopr/1r~~r-~-C U:\/i'[S . C:'C :"ii/ITER --'_. ",,-_.~ _..__.__.^-,....._...".~~._---;-'- FiLE GOPl i"1 ---".,'--"...~._..., ...--. . . rr-'~~~~~~~"'~''''~ri:~~' ~;~fi\~-' !::~:'.j' ',' ::'\' c.' ,; .:\ ";:'; .,-.~ :~,~,t-r;;":::~>1 II : I L.Ji.'cU~:L..LLLigU.~.:,j i'l :: ~ i '. <~ J I j ] j ;: iI II II d !: ! lilli' OCT1!::2000 ." jl ! I \1 u ' ~ I.. J \~ ~ j I . I Pi. i\;.f;.F'l:.....c,r)'(vIC()i l~ .,~. . . ~_.. '-J~~;LL;_~ ~~2f__~1L [!~:...!~.. ~:)'\!(..\< J 1124 Drew Street Clearwater, FL 33755-4817 October 13, 2000 Lisa Fierce, and All Concerned Planning and Development Services City of Clearwater P.O.Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 Re: NOTICE DATED 9/30/00, ITEM #5 (PINELLAS SUNCOAST TRANSIT AUTHORITY REQUEST). To Whom It May Concern: I am alarmed at subject proposal to move the bus station into my neighborhood from center downtown Clearwater. The proper location for a bus station should be in the center of downtown--the destination of the riders. It would be poor planning to undermine the value of some of Clearwater's quality neighborhoods by moving the bus station to a remote, illogical out of central downtown location next to these residential areas. The noise, diesel fumes and transient people associated with that operation are somewhat acceptable in your business district, but would have a very negative impact on my neighborhood--and the property value. Please, for the sake of the bus riders, and the property values and quality of life for your citizens in my area, do not approve subject request. For whatever reason this request is being made, it cannot be good for the greater community. Sincerely, James J. Thornton, homeowner Country Club Addit., Blk.1, Lots 2,3&4. Phone: (727) 442-7917 (L (JJ .0)5. ~~ '* c rz-A aU . tl'I. I fiLE COPl I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS PSTA LAURA STREET TRANSIT TERMINAL Prepared For: Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority 14840 49th Street North Clearwater, Florida 33762-2893 Prepared By: .!!~ :!illllj~~;~laC~~~i,~Suite 300 June 2000 ~ ~@~DvE~ ~~ AUG 2 4 2000 ~ ---" PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SVCS CITY OF CLEARWAfER Project # 1520-001-000 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .~ I TRAFFIC IMP ACT ANALYSIS PST A LAURA STREET TRANSIT TERMINAL Prepared For: Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority 14840 49th Street North Clearwater, Florida 33762-2893 Prepared By: ........................ ~in @Mlt~gf~tV,sscy.)lIs.rE1>. ~!fC. Mt~~lIM$.fnorjal Highway rmmm.:::Mmprial Center, Suite 300 :::a,lg!:I::::llorida 3363,~ June 2000 Project # 1520-001-000 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION II. EXISTING CONDITIONS A. Physical Characteristics B. Capacity Analysis ID. FUTURE CONDITIONS A. Trip Generation B. Trip Distribution and Traffic Assignment C. Capacity Analysis v. CONCLUSIONS TABLE 1 TABLE 2 TABLE 3 Existing Intersection Capacity Analysis Trip Generation Analysis Intersection Capacity Analysis (Future AM and PM Peak Hour Conditions) FIGURE 1 FIGURE 2 FIGURE 3 Project Location Existing Peak Hour Volumes Background Plus Project Traffic APPENDIX A - APPENDIX B - APPENDIX C - APPENDIX D - Traffic Counts Existing Highway Capacity Analysis Proposed Routing Schedules Future Highway Capacity Analysis ~ 97 G:\TRAFFIC\PINELLAS\PSTA\REPORT.WPD Page 1 1 3 4 6 6 8 3 6 8 2 5 7 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I PSTA LAURA STREET TRANSIT TERMINAL SITE IMPACT TRAFFIC ANALYSIS I. INTRODUCTION Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority (PSTA) has outgrown their current Park Street Terminal location in downtown Clearwater, Florida. PSTA has conducted an alternative site survey in downtown Clearwater, and has chosen a site referred to as the Laura Street location as a prime candidate. This analysis will focus on the Laura Street site. The proposed Laura Street Transit Terminal is located at the old Clearwater High School location. The site lies on a 3-3.5:t acre parcel of land bounded by North Greenwood Avenue to the east, Booth Avenue North to the west, Grove Street to the north, and Laura Street to the south (See Figure 1). This study will focus on expected traffic conditions with the proposed land use, and determine if any improvements are necessary for the impacted roadway network to maintain an acceptable level of service (LOS). The purpose of this report is to determine the expected traffic impact the proposed Laura Street Transit Terminal will have on the su"ounding roadway network within the immediate vicinity of the project site. II. EXISTING CONDITIONS A. Physical Characteristics The proposed Laura Street Transit Terminal site is currently vacant, and is located between two major east/west arterials, Drew Street (SR 590) to the north, and Cleveland Street (SR 60) to the south. Buses will enter and exit the transit terminal via North Greenwood Avenue. The proposed terminal is located one block north and one block south of signalized intersections at Cleveland Street. (SR 60) and Drew Street (SR 590). There will be an access/egress driveway along Booth Avenue, which is anticipated to service employee and passenger traffic only. North Greenwood Avenue is a two-lane (2) undivided city collector that traverses in a north/south direction. The segment between Cleveland Street and Drew Street is 24 feet wide with two (2) twelve (12) foot lanes divided by a two solid yellow lines. Both sides of North Greenwood Avenue have concrete curbs and four (4) foot sidewalks. This segment is signed 30 mile per hour (mph). The other roads bordering the property are local collector roadways, North Greenwood Avenue is expected to carry the majority of bus traffic, however some bus traffic may utilize Laura Street. Grove Street and Booth Avenue are not expected to carry any bus traffic. The property is located in a mixed-use section of Clearwater, with single family housing, multi-family housing, motel and businesses located adjacent to the site. G:\TRAFFIC\PINELLAS\PST A\REPORT. WPD Ii... . "mg x:~~........,,,.... 1 I I I ~~ I z-< =; ~ .. ~ ::s C) I I I I ... c z - I :E a: I w c t- o t- 1- .. - m I U) CJ Z 0 ~ ... I CD t- .. I- t- U) I w .. w CJ a: CD I t- I..... 0 U) .. ~ D. I :) I c ... I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I B. Capacity Analysis Greenwood Avenue is classified as a city collector, with a maximum service flow rate (msfr) of988 vehicles in the PM peak hour Cleveland Street, between Missouri Avenue and Myrtle Street, is classified as an Arterial Class 1, with a msfr of 1,189 on the segment between Missouri Avenue and Greenwood Avenue, and 3,343 vehicles in the PM peak hour, between Greenwood Avenue and Myrtle Street. Drew Street, between Missouri Avenue and Myrtle Street, is classified as an Arterial Class 2, with a msfr of2,730 on the segment between Missouri Avenue and Greenwood Avenue, and 1,942 vehicles in the PM peak hour, between Greenwood Avenue and Myrtle Street. Existing conditions were evaluated for the surrounding roadway segments and intersections immediately adjoining the proposed project property during the week of May 22, 2000. Turning movement counts were conducted for the PM peak hours for the two intersections adjoining the project site location, while 24-hour volume counts were conducted on Cleveland Street and Drew Street. Peak hour link and turning movement counts were adjusted to peak season conditions using the FDOT's peak season adjustment factors for Pinellas County. Copies of the 24-hour count reports, peak season adjustment factors and turning movement count spreadsheets are presented in Appendix A. Table 1 displays the existing conditions roadway capacity analysis. All existing conditions for roadways are reported in the 1999 Pinellas County Roadway Inventory and Level of Service Report. Copies of the pertinent pages are included in Appendix A. Table 1 ROADWAY SEGMENT CAPACITY ANALYSIS Existin~ Conditions) <) ............ ................ Itoa rSegDl < ~l\'1..."(lea~:I.fPllr Ma!iIlltiItl~~l"Yi~~...... ........" ...., .,'.. > ....... ..... ..... ..... Pl\'II.(jS >.................... Vri1tlme<. FlbwRat~(LOS...D).. Cleveland Street from Missouri Ave. To 2,045 1 1 89 E Greenwood Ave. , Cleveland Street from Greenwood Ave to Myrtle 1 ,625 3,343 D Street Greenwood Ave. From Cleveland Street to 523 988 D Court Street Drew Street from Missouri Ave to Greenwood 1 ,246 2,730 C Ave Drew Street from Greenwood Ave. To Myrtle 1 1 12 1,942 D Street , Notes: Maximum Service Flow Rates were derived from the 1999 Pinellas County Roadway Inventory and Level of Service Report. G:\TRAFFIC\PINEll..AS\PST A\REPORT. WPD 3 :~:::.. ding ~~J:'::''''''''''''''' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I As was stated earlier, 24-hour tube counts were conducted on Cleveland Street and Drew Street. After applying the seasonal adjustment factor, the PM peak hour volume on Cleveland Street was approximately 10 percent lower than what appears in the 1999 Pinellas County Roadway Inventory and Level of Service Report. The PM peak hour volume on Drew Street was approximately the same as reported in the 1999 Pinellas County Roadway Inventory and Level of Service Report. Signalized capacity analyses were conducted to determine the existing intersection level of service and delay at the following intersections: .:. Cleveland Street (SR 60) @ Greenwood Avenue North .:. Drew Street (SR 590) @ Greenwood Avenue North The Highway Capacity Software (HCS), which replicates the procedures outlined in the Transportation Research Board's, Special Report 209, 1997 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), was utilized in the analysis. Table 2 provides the results of the intersection capacity analyses and Appendix B contains the HCS worksheets. Figure 2 displays the existing conditions within the study area. Based on the results of the roadway link and signalized intersection capacity analyses presented in Table 1 and Table 2, all roadway links and intersections adjoining the proposed project are functioning at acceptable levels of service. m. FUTURE CONDITIONS This section of the report contains trip generation, trip distribution and traffic assignment information, and analyzes expected peak hour conditions with the project in place. The project development is expected to be complete in the year 2001. In order to determine the expected growth in background traffic, an annual growth rate of 3 percent was applied to the existing background traffic on each intersection approach, thereby creating future background traffic. The intersections and growth rates are as follows: .:. .:. Cleveland Street (SR 60) @ Greenwood Avenue North Drew Street (SR 590) @ Greenwood Avenue North 3.0% per year 3.0% per year A. Traffic Generation Trip generation for the PSTA Transit Terminal was provided by PSTA The proposed routing for fixed routes at the Laura Street Terminal was prepared by PSTA, and includes route: 18, 52,60,61, 66, 67, 73, 76, 78, 80, 82, 92, and 98. The proposed routing, anticipated number of trips per day, and anticipated trips per hour are presented in Appendix C PSTA also estimates that a staffing change will occur between the PM peak hours, and will add 3 to 6 trips. These vehicles will enter and exit on Booth Avenue. G:\TRAFFIC\PINELLAS\PST A\REPORT. WPD lI.l,:," ~Ulg ~~~........'^'.... 4 I I I ~N I Z< =~ ~ ..~ ::::J C) I .. CI) CI) I .. .. '. " ", ',< C I CIS&: - CI) .> :Q) ~ - I CJ u ... <I: U) w z 0 - tn I .... tn :E e 0 a:: 0 .- ... w ..... CD .- I . il I- " ~ It) l- e m N 0 ~ - I ~ en u tn "-"" 0 0 N U) Z 0 ... 0 ~ 0 I "N "eA ... 0 pOOMue l- N .. .. .. CI) CI) ?- m I CI) I CI) w .. .. i ~ .. U) .. w U) CI) ca a:: ~ .. ?- m I Q ::I e .. ca en C) .- ... ..... U) = en I 0 .- )( ... :) w . <I: I ... I ~ ! I I .....-f_~ ~ +-<- 0 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I . - .--............-..-......--.-- ,... ".nfrecdMiMM:6ven1eht . Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Overall Intersection 14.6 12.9 15.3 14.7 14.7 B B B B B . .............<.....J)rtw.Strtet....taJ..Greenwood..,Avenue. North.."..'...'."""'." . ......... ...............................1 .. . ..' Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Overall Intersection 18.0 14.5 17.5 14.6 16.4 B B B B B B. Trip Distribution and Traffic Assignment Once the background traffic was established, project traffic was added to create future traffic conditions. The movement of external bus traffic between the proposed development and surrounding areas was distributed according to the proposed routing for fixed routes prepared by PST A. Distribution and number of buses were determined by the trips per hour, by route information provided by PSTA. As stated earlier, the proposed routes, trips per day, and trips per hour can be found in Appendix C Additionally, the relocation of the transit terminal from Park to Laura Street will change the circulation ofthe buses. Buses will be traveling up and down Greenwood Avenue North, turning on Cleveland Street and Drew Street. It was important to make sure the existing roadway has sufficient roadway width, and the intersections have adequate turning radii. C. Capacity Analysis Total traffic on the study area intersections was calculated by adding project traffic to background traffic. A turning movement count spreadsheet detailing future background and project traffic are included in Appendix D. Detailed capacity analysis of study area intersections was completed using HCS and FDOT software analysis procedures. Future background plus project generated traffic in the PM peak hour, is shown in Figure 3. The HCS analysis printouts for future background plus project traffic are included in Appendix D. Table 3 shows the future intersection analyses for the PM Peak Hours. Consideration was given to the movement of pedestrians across Cleveland Street and Drew Street with the added bus traffic. G:\TRAFF1C\PINELLAS\PST A \REPORT. WPD ,lI.l,:, " :....00. d ~~~~:."""'..... ...e, 6 I I I _Z-< L I b.., I I I I I I l I I I I L I I I I I ... G.l !- ... - enl ..~ .. Q ". r' l ra tn o II · i-;H,."'" ... ..I · .. ...... n POOMU88J9 ~.~;. s:: n ..to-::: .. .. .... en ... G.l en ~ l! .. :s __ C) < ;0) .. U 1- - - a I i ra tn NZ. I... 0 ....N 14-. U ~.~ ;. c:: ... En.... -4.. LU ~ ' l'1'r ez ......, 0 T ..0 i ...... I~ I ... <C u Z .- - ... :IE ... ~ l! w l- I- .. u I- G) - .... en 0 z .. = a. I en l I- :s - II- a. w " w c - ~ :s I- 0 .. en m ~ ~ U ftS ~ al ... --- i J I - ~ ! ...., ~ ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Table 3 INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS Future Peak Hour Conditions .-..--..,...,...,.---..."...-.........'......-'..... ..............Dil'~Hit)h~l.Mt')"~ffieit................... Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Overall Intersection 14.7 13.2 15.8 15.1 15.0 B B B B B i ................<! ...... 'nteWStr~~f(tiJ(;teeJlW6otiAveriueNol'tli' Northbound 17.5 Southbound 14.1 Eastbound 17.3 Westbound 14.5 Overall Intersection 16.1 B B B B B Additionally, heavy vehicle traffic was increased to 5 percent to help compensate for the additional bus traffic that would be present on Greenwood Avenue North. As Table 3 illustrates, the addition of the bus traffic to future background traffic does not cause the surrounding intersections to fall below an acceptable level of service. v. CONCLUSIONS The Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority has outgrown their current transit terminal in downtown Clearwater, and is actively analyzing alternative sites for a new transit terminal. The Laura Street transit terminal is located east of downtown Clearwater at the site of the old Clearwater High SchooL For the proposed site, estimated 2001 background traffic and project added traffic were distributed to the surrounding roadway network in order to analyze nearby intersection levels of service in the project study area. Existing, as well as future conditions for the study area network demonstrates that the surrounding network currently functions at an acceptable level of service, will continue to function at an acceptable level of service with the project, and will require no improvements to the surrounding roadway network. If the Laura Street location is selected, the design of the facility driveways will be designed to accommodate the mix of vehicle types that are anticipated to use the new facility. G:\TRAFFlC\PINELLAS\PST A\REPORT. WPD Ii,,, ....md ~:~~:.......,.......e 8 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I >- Ill: c( . :I~ :1-: :Hn I enw ........ z:! ::)U 00 Uen en I ....c( Zo Wz :1_ Will: >W I ow :I!!!: 00 ZZ _W Zo I IIl:Z ::)- ....~ CD C! 5 t) ro u.. c: .2 t) ~ o () c: o III ro CI) en -" ro CI) a. '<t -" := g ~ ~ :Sl 0 0 C! 0 0 6 N Il)... ..... Q) () ~Jg IE !!! ro CI) ~ Q) c: 3:(30:: Iii Iii .... ~ "z <( ~w z ~ z~ W ::I~ .J 00 u: 0 00 Cli ~ '0 8 ~ c: CI) ~ ~ (9 0 c: o/! 0 ::l 0 en.... Ci5 ~ M ~::E ~ N in roo/! ~ 0 ~.J 0 ()-, Iii Z ~ .. a= lli:w 0 w> ~ .... :l:lli: Z !;iw 0 ::I wI/) 0 0 ~~ .J 0 M(O .....Il) I'-'<t Il)'<t '<t.I'-. 1'-.1'-. ..... ..... ..... ..... .J M 1'-(01'- M ~ I'- .....OlClO I'- N '<tMM ~ 0 ..... .... 0 0 0 00 0 w a. 0 ..... M I'-M '<t Z .............. ..... '<t ~ 0:: 0 to (0 M o'<t M I-- en :c ..... N .....0 Il) W 1--..... .......... ..... '<t 3: Ol Ol co I'- ..... I-- M 1.J , 0 0 00 0 10 i~ 0 I Ol M II-- '<t '<t(O Z N ~ 10:: 0 l:c to M '<t'<t N I-- u; en '<t (O'<t 0 ~ II-- ..... ..... ..... Il) i II-- Oil) '<tM N ..... !.J 0 0 0 00 0 W 0 a. z NN MM 0 ~ ~ ..... 0 to :c 00 '<tN (0 I-- :c M'<t NM N ~ I-- ..... 0 en trl Ol M..... ClO ~ ..... N i IfilOOOO 10. I I MIl)OOl 1--..... N 010:: Z I I'-ClOIl)..... 6 ~M'<t'<tll) ~ I MM(O'<t ~I~ i ~ .J 0 ~ WO Oil) Oil) 0 ::E- o..... M'<t I-- _0:: :.t:.t :.t:.t 0:: I--W a. ~ 0 :c ~ co N OClO (0 '<t N OlM Ol Il) '<t MM (0. ..... 0 0 00 0 ..... '<t 01'- N N.......... Il) 0 Il) Olll) Ol N 0 OM (0 ..... ..... ..... ..... '<t '<tl'- '<t'<t Ol ..... 0 0 00 0 '<t (0 Ol'<t M N Il) I'- M..... (0 M I'- Il)..... I'- N ..... ..... ..... (0 M M MN ..... ..... 0 0 00 0 N M NO I'- ..... (0 (OOl N Il) M N..... M ..... Ol Oll)'<t ClO ..... N o 0 0 00 0 I'- 0 00 I'- ..... ..... ..... ..... '<t N Il) Nil) '<t I'- '<t Il)M 0 N ClO (0 1'-1'- IX) N I'- '<t co ..... (0 ..... ...I ~ Oil) Oil) 0 0..... M'<t I-- Ii; Ii; Ii; Ii; 0:: ~ 0 :I: ~~~ ~~ 10 Iw ~io. 6!~ ~I enl wl:c 3:'1-- I i~ 000 10 ~i~ gl~ ~I:c 3:11-- II-- !..J Il) N o 1l).....1l) 1l).....(O o ClO Il) Olll)..... MClOOl '<t . o Il) (0 '<t '<tIl)(O N ClO o 0 000 0 0 w w a. a. 0 OMM 0 N z ~ N ClO Z ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 0 to 0(01'- to M I-- I-- en :c NOlI'- en :I: (0 ~ I-- I'- 0 ~ I-- I'- MN..... '<t ~ ..... ClO ~ ..... 0 0 000 lfil 0 w 0 a. 0 10. Z .....(ON Z II-- N ~ ~ ..... Ol ~ ..... 0 0 0 I: to to :c M(OO :c N I-- :c '<tl'-I'- I-- Il) ~ I-- ..... 0 ~ II-- ..... 0 0 en en MClOIl) Il) ~ C") ..... r- I.... M 0 1...1 10 000 10 0 Iw 10. IW 1 (OOlO 10. Ol I: 1l).....1'- II-- Il) 0 10:: 0 I I Z MM'<t i:l: (0 ~ .....1'-1'- N 0 II-- N 0 II-- N to :c '<tClOIl) Il) ~ N I'- Is N 0 Is 0 z I I ::;) ::;) -I -I 0 0 > > 0::: ~ II 0::: ::E ::;) ::;) a. 0 ~ Ot-=II 0 ~ 0 ::E: ~::Eu.. ::E: M ::E- ::E- li; ~ _0:: Il)>:c ~ _0:: I--W ~::Eo. I--W <C a. <C a. 0 w ~~ W M D. '<t D. :.t I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ c:c . 2~ 2~ :;:)cn cnw I ....~ z_ :;:)U 00 ucn ....cn I zC:C wO 2! WDl: >W I ow 2! 00 Zz _W Zo I Dl:z :;:)- ....::.= CD C! ... ~ CIl U. c: o n l!! l5 u c: o en CIl Q) C/) '" CIl Q) 0... '<t '" ~ .~ > Q) :9 0 0 C! ~ 0 0 6 "I LO... ~ Q) c3- en ;:CIl CIl i: E! ... CIl Qi ~Q) c: 3;:0 i:i: Iii Iii I- ::i: "z ct ~w z .. z::i: ~~ ::):;; 00 ii:u uu ~ '0 ~ c: Q) l!! (9 c/l ~ c;j Oc: 0", '0 ~C/)I- c: CIl ~~::!E Qi > L(jCllc/l Q) 0.9!....J 0 u..., Iii I- .. Z ct..a:: 0 ca::w ~ I-~~ z~w U ::lwl/) 0 8:r:~ ..J CO<D o~ LOLO NLO co. O!- 001 ~~ N'''''': ....IN LOOlN co <(01 C')I'-LO LO I-'<t '<t'<t'<t co. 0 ~ I- 00 000 0 W 0... 0 LO '<t<D<D N Z Ii: ::> 0 00 C')<D LO~ LO I- C/) ILO LOLO<D "I UJ I-~ ~~~ <D ~ LO'<t <D<D ~ ~ "I 00 000 0 W 0... 0 LOC') '<tN ~ Z Ii: ::> 0 00 '<t0l NCO C') I- C/) II'- '<t<D<D LO <( I-~ ~~~ <D W <DCO coo "I ~ ~ C') 00 000 0 W 0 0... Z 01 '<tC')N CO ::> Ii: ~ 0 00 I I'-C') N<D CO I- IC') C')'<tN C') ::> I- ~ 0 C/) COC') ~o "I 1-"1 "INN 01 ....J 10 00 00 0 IW 10... I C')N "IN 01 II- ~~ ~~ '<t a:: 0 z C')I'- C')I'- 0 ::> ILO C')LOC') CO 0 I- ~ 00 I '<tN 1'-"1 LO Ii: ~ 0 ~ Z ....J 0 ~ WO OLO OLO 0 ::!E- o~ C')'<t I- _0:: :.t:.t :.t:.t 0:: I-W 0... ::> 0 I ~ 001 001 CO 0101 ~~ C;;. LO'<t '<t'<t ~ 00 00 0 <DI'- '<tLO "I "I Ol~ COC') ~ <D<D LOLO ~~ ~~ <D <DI'- '<tLO "I "I 00 00 0 ~N ~'<t CO ~C') LON CO 010 C')LO ~N ~~ <D <D<D C')'<t 01 ~ 00 00 0 CO'<t <D<D '<t "I N<D <DLO 01 LOC') NC') '<t ~ ~Ol <DI'- C') C')~~ I'- 00 00 0 00 COCO <D N~ '<t '<t~ CON LO Ol'<t '<tC') N <DC') ~CO CO ~ ....J ~ OLO OLO 0 O~ C')'<t I- u-iu-i u-iu-i 0:: ::l 0 I ~~~ ~~ 0 000 0 0 ,W W 0 10... 0 0... Z I LO'<tOl Z I'- ::> 'l- N CO ::> Ii: "I 0 10:: ci 0 00 00 l- I I- C/) II <DC')<D C/) LO W '<t0l0l W I CO ~ !I- <D ci ~ I- <D I~ LO'<tOl I'- "I CO l- N ci ....J 0 000 '0 0 W lw 0... io... 0 0l~<D 0 II- 0 Z Ii: LO Z ~ ::> ci ::> ,0:: 0 0' 00 '<tLOOl ~II I'- I- C/) I "I 01 CO <D ~ l- I'- ci ~il- I'- O'<tLO "I ~ C') I'- i~ C') ci 0 000 10 0 W 'W 0 0... 0 io... Z I'-<DC') Z II- CO ::> I- ~ LO ::> ~ 0 0:: ci 0 !o:: 00 00 1 I <DOlLO I I LO l- I LOLOI'- I- I~ <D ::> I- ~ ci ::> ~ 0 0 C/) C/) ~'<tC') <D I- 0lC')1'- I- 01 ....J ci ....J 0 000 Ira 0 W 0... 10... ~coco I'- I- ~ <D Iii: LO 0:: ci 0 0 I Z LO<DO Z II 01 ::> I NI'-<D ::> C') 0 l- N ci 0 'l- N 00 00 I I CO<D'<t I 01 Ii: I ~ <D Ii: I ~ 0 ci 0 II- Z II- Z I....J j....J I :;:) :) ..J ..J 0 0 > > a:: ~ II a:: ::!E :) :) 0... 0 ~ Ot-=II 0 ~ 0 J: ~::!Eu. J: C') ::!E- ::!E- u-i ~ _0:: LO>I ~ _0:: I-W '::!Eo... I-W <( 0... 0 <( 0... 0 W ~~ W C') D. '<t D. :.t I I King Engineering Associates, Inc, 15 MINUTE, 2 CHANNEL VEHICLE COUNT REFERENCE: CLEVEX24 CORRECTION FACTOR: 1,00 LOCATION: CLEVELAND STREET JUST EAST OF GREENWOOD AVENUE FILENAME: \CLEVEX24 WEATHER: CLEAR AND SUNNY TUESDAY 5 / 22 / 0 _1II_____0P~~;;:-~~L---------------~-------------------;;;;---------------------~-------------------;;;;-------C;;;;;;;-- BEGINS 0 15 30 45 TOTAL 0 15 30 45 TOTAL TOTAL -1II----------~~-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 12 * * * * * * * 1 * * * 2 * * 3 * * * * 4 * * * * 5 * * * * 6 * * * * 7 * * * * * 8 * * * * 9 * * * * 10 * * * * * 11 * * * * * PM 12 * \1 * 2 * 3 44 180 196 420 0 165 219 384 804 4 209 196 174 213 792 254 247 234 225 960 1752 5 181 262 227 181 851 215 271 266 203 955 1806 6 160 152 149 139 600 200 181 189 193 763 1363 7 99 114 93 90 396 176 160 164 147 647 1043 8 87 99 88 73 347 163 153 151 119 586 933 9 96 95 91 85 367 113 110 97 110 430 797 10 83 86 70 61 300 89 110 73 85 357 657 11 40 44 40 35 159 65 64 51 70 250 409 1It---------~~~~~~--------------------------------------------~;;;----------------------------------------------;;;;---------;;~~--- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I AM PEAK HOUR IS (NO PEAK HOUR) VOLUME EB DIRECTIONAL SPLIT PEAK HOUR FACTOR COMBINED: 0,00 0,00 0.00 PM PEAK HOUR IS 4:45 TO 5:45 VOLUME EB DIRECTIONAL SPLIT PEAK HOUR FACTOR COMBINED: 1860 WB 977 53% 0.90 883 47% 0.84 0,87 I I King Engineering Associates, Inc, 15 MINUTE, 2 CHANNEL VEHICLE COUNT REFERENCE: CLEVEX24 CORRECTION FACTOR: 1.00 LOCATION: CLEVELAND STREET JUST EAST OF GREENWOOD AVENUE FILENAME: \CLEVEX24 WEATHER: CLEAR AND SUNNY ~ WEDNESDAY 5 I 23 I 0 1II______0P~;;~:-J~L--------------~--------------------;;;;----------------------~-------------------;;;;-------~;;;;;;;-- BEGINS 0 15 30 45 TOTAL 0 15 30 45 TOTAL TOTAL 111-----------~~-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 12 41 39 29 32 141 47 44 37 29 157 298\ 1 34 20 24 12 90 23 22 25 14 84 174 2 19 13 16 16 64 19 20 16 18 73 137 3 12 14 13 5 44 18 17 10 13 58 102 4 9 10 6 14 39 8 10 12 13 43 82 5 13 15 22 21 71 22 15 18 17 72 143 6 28 29 50 49 156 38 36 71 105 250 406 7 76 84 98 113 371 135 114 175 203 627 998 8 139 135 138 126 538 273 235 259 240 1007 1545 9 114 137 134 136 521 234 201 181 176 792 1313 10 132 157 138 154 581 211 233 200 235 879 1460 11 171 183 177 193 724 221 223 239 244 927 1651 PM 1'2 168 199 191 177 735 268 248 267 242 1025 1760 ~ 187 198 163 170 718 273 244 233 243 993 1711 2 192 178 163 157 690 232 238 216 223 909 1599 3 194 208 209 221 832 218 217 242 239 916 1748 4 189 188 199 192 768 233 238 194 236 901 1669 5 181 246 229 165 821 212 225 205 180 822 1643 6 158 138 * * 296 189 200 * * 389 685 7 * * * * * * * * * * 8 * * * * * * * 9 * * * * * * 10 * * * * * 11 * * * * * * * * * * * 1It----------~~~~~~--------------------------------------------~;~~---------------------------------------------~~~;~--------~~~;~--- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I AM PEAK HOUR IS 11:00 TO 12:00 VOLUME HB DIRECTIONAL SPLIT PEAK HOUR FACTOR COMBINED: 1651 WB 927 56% 0,95 724 44% 0.94 0,94 PM PEAK' HOUR IS 12:15 TO 1:15 VOLUME EB DIRECTIONAL SPLIT PEAK HOUR FACTOR COMBINED: 1784 WB 1030 58% 0,94 754 42% 0,95 0,97 King Engineering Associates, Inc, 15 MINUTE, 2 CHANNEL VEHICLE COUNT REFERENCE: DREWX24 CORRECTION FACTOR: 1,00 LOCATION: DREW STREET JUST EAST OF GREENWOOD AVENUE FILENAME: \DREWX24 WEATHER: CLEAR AND SUNNY TUESDAY 5 / 22 / 0 -1If-----~p~:;;:-~RL-------------~-------------------;oU;---------------------~-------------------;ou;-------co~;;;;O-- BEGINS 0 15 30 45 TOTAL 0 15 30 45 TOTAL TOTAL -1It----------~~-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 12 * * * * * * * * * * *\ 1 * * * * * * * * * * 2 * * * * * * * * 3 * * * * * * * * 4 * * * * * * * * 5 * * * * * * * * * 6 * * * * * * * * 7 * * * * * * * * 8 * * * * * * * 9 * * * * * * * * 10 * * * * * * * * 11 * * * * * PM t2 * * \1 * * 2 * * * 3 * * * 4 * 20 140 195 355 * 0 117 133 250 605 5 152 232 203 188 775 120 118 144 110 492 1267 6 136 158 118 102 514 130 114 123 103 470 984 7 86 79 69 69 303 111 117 89 91 408 711 8 69 59 58 58 244 84 68 58 64 274 518 9 56 68 63 46 233 50 61 57 53 221 454 10 61 66 47 37 211 38 61 45 34 178 389 11 32 47 52 42 173 29 33 27 26 115 288 1It---------~~~~~~--------------------------------------------;~~~----------------------------------------------;~~~---------~;~~--- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I * * * * * * * * AM PEAK HOUR IS (NO PEAK HOUR) VOLUME EB DIRECTIONAL SPLIT PEAK HOUR FACTOR COMBINED: 0,00 0,00 0,00 PM PEAK HOUR IS 4:45 TO 5:45 VOLUME EB DIRECTIONAL SPLIT PEAK HOUR FACTOR COMBINED: 1297 WB 515 40% 0.89 782 60% 0,84 0.93 REFERENCE: DREWX24 LOCATION: DREW STREET JUST EAST OF WEATHER: CLEAR AND SUNNY OPERATOR: JRL 1--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- HOUR @ HOUR (ID HOUR COMBINED BEGINS 0 15 30 45 TOTAL 0 15 30 45 TOTAL TOTAL 1_-------------------------. --------------------------------------------------. ----------------------------------------------------- AM 12 31 37 21 18 107 21 22 21 12 76 183. 1 21 13 9 11 54 21 9 11 13 54 108 2 8 13 8 10 39 5 8 4 7 24 63 3 2 7 7 7 23 3 2 9 4 18 41 4 2 3 2 5 12 7 0 6 4 17 29 5 4 7 9 17 37 11 12 15 13 51 88 6 17 26 37 48 128 20 35 52 70 177 305 7 55 67 84 79 285 85 88 126 154 453 738 8 67 100 109 100 376 182 175 178 197 732 1108 9 117 102 115 88 422 201 143 155 117 616 1038 10 104 107 117 106 434 124 115 115 100 454 888 11 127 114 136 142 519 128 113 145 114 500 1019 PM 112 \1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 I I I I I I I -1----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTALS 6055 6377 12432 I I I I I I I I I 99 130 132 144 140 158 120 * * * 157 118 113 154 156 248 * * AM PEAK HOUR IS 8:15 TO 9:15 VOLUME EB DIRECTIONAL SPLIT PEAK HOUR FACTOR PM PEAK HOUR IS 4:45 TO VOLUME DIRECTIONAL SPLIT PEAK HOUR FACTOR 5:45 EB King Engineering Associates, Inc. 15 MINUTE, 2 CHANNEL VEHICLE COUNT CORRECTION FACTOR: 1.00 GREENWOOD AVENUE 115 104 124 171 166 195 * * * 137 114 124 156 181 163 * * * * 508 466 493 625 643 764 120 * * 426 36% 0.91 WB 782 62% 0,79 WB 126 146 144 133 112 111 121 * * * 751 64% 0,93 481 38% 0,92 133 153 125 137 132 131 * * * * FILENAME: \DREWX24 WEDNESDAY 5 / 23 / 0 122 133 136 136 135 116 * * 502 558 524 521 502 477 121 * 121 126 119 115 123 119 * * COMBINED: 1177 0.93 COMBINED: 1263 0,83 1010 1024 1017 1146 1145 1241 241 * I Florida Department of Transportation Transportation Statistics Office I 1998 Peak Season Factor Category Report Week Dates SF ~ MOCF Category: 1500 0.94 I. PINELLAS COUNTYWIDE 1 01/01/1998 - 01/03/1998 1.04 1.11 / 2 01/04/1998 - 01/10/1998 1.02 1.09 I ,L/ , 3 01/11/1998 - 01/17/1998 1.01 1.08 \. ~II~ " 4 01/18/1998 - 01/24/1998 1.00 1.07 .~~ U1~. t., N . u. 5 01/25/1998 - 01/31/1998 0.99 1.06 I ..' ,/ ~ fil'7 . 6 02/01/1998 - 02/07/1998 0.97 1.03 . .v--, " I ) ./ / * 7 02/08/1998 - 02/14/1998 0.96 1.02 . ./ "\ . ,\?- ' ./ //~/ * 8 02/15/1998 - 02/21/1998 0.95 1.01 \r .S,i) . I A"O \ '" 9 02/22/1998 - 02/28/1998 0.94 1.00 I * 10 03/01/1998 - 03/07/1998 0.94 1.00 '~/~V .1. * 11 03/08/1998 - 03/14/1998 0.93 0.99 ~ f , ,,~ . ,...~. * 12 03/15/1998 - 03/21/1998 0.92 0.98 I ._ L,~_. '" 13 03/22/1998 - 03/28/1998 0.92 0.98 \)\ * 14 03/29/1998 - 04/04/1998 0.92 0.98 ... '" 15 04/05/1998 - 04/11/1998 0.92 0.98 ~\"' ',-, '" 16 04/12/1998- 04/18/1998 0.92 0.98 I ~........., ~, * 17 04/19/1998 - 04/25/1998 ,. 0.94 1.00 .......~...,~" '''"', * 18 04/26/1998 - 05/02/1998 0.96 1.02 '" * 19 05/03/1998 - 05/09/1998 0.97 1.03 '~\. I 20 05/10/1998 - 05/16/1998 0.99 1.06 21 05/17/1998 - OS/23/1998 0.99 1.06 22 n'i/14/1 QQR - O'i/10/1 QQR 099 t 06 1 23 05/31/1998 - 06/06/1998 0.99 1.06 24 06/07/1998 - 06/13/1998 0.99 1.06 25 06/14/1998 - 06/20/1998 0.99 1.06 26 06/21/1998 - 06/27/1998 0.99 1.06 1 27 06/28/1998 - 07/04/1998 1.00 1.07 28 07/05/1998 - 07/11/1998 1.01 1.08 29 07/12/1998 - 07/18/1998 1.01 1.08 I 30 07/19/1998 - 07/25/1998 1.02 1.09 31 07/26/1998 - 08/01/1998 1.02 1.09 32 08/02/1998 - 08/08/1998 1.02 1.09 I 33 08/09/1998 - 08/15/1998 1.03 1.10 34 08/16/1998 - 08/22/1998 1.04 1.11 35 08/23/1998 - 08/29/1998 1.06 1.13 36 08/30/1998 - 09/05/1998 1.08 1.15 I 37 09/06/1998 - 09/12/1998 1.09 1.16 38 09/13/1998 - 09/1911998 1.11 1.18 39 09/20/1998 - 09/26/1998 1.09 1.16 I 40 09127/1998 - 10/03/1998 1.07 1.14 41 10/04/1998 - 10/10/1998 1.05 1.12 42 10/11/1998 - 10/17/1998 1.03 1.10 1 43 10/18/1998 - 10/24/1998 1.03 1.10 44 10/25/1998.- 10/31/1998 1.04 1.11 45 11/01/1998 - 11/07/1998 1.04 1.11 46 11/08/1998 - 11/14/1998 1.04 1.11 1 47 11/15/1998 - 11/21/1998 1.04 1.11 48 11/22/1998 -11/28/1998 1.04 1.11 49 11/29/1998 - 12/05/1998 1.04 1.11 I 50 12/06/1998 - 12/12/1998 1.04 1.11 51 12/13/1998 - 12/19/1998 1.04 1.11 52 12/20/1998 - 12/26/1998 1.02 1.09 53 12/27/1998 - 12/31/1998 1.01 1.08 1 - -------------------- II II l:l Q. ~ -' '" U ",Ue. ie.> g.~ U U ~ ~ VI> .!l! III ~< -g'i n.Q. I-~ a:... !~ e.~ !-~ '" X._ ",VII- < ~~ ';ja:Cl "C.9~~ o Cl c ;; I- i .5 Q) J:-' U :::! > ~o CJ) '" U ~ t) l3!.!. :.tc;~~ ~Gci ::l~LL t3~~ :i~ .~ 'g 0 .;-= ~ ..iL~ II~ Qi :::! l/) Q) :0 al I- . . . . II . . I- '" ~ ~ u# -o~ o~o ~ -J: x:... e. B,; _ ~g$ VI&t II II .! U; ~ ~UU II 1Il'~ ~ ~ "'ILL I- ~ 01 II Xl · C ~ .$ .. ~ -' -'<" Q. VI II ~~!j C 't;1 E ~ G) fI) e.e. II II E _ e 0 IIlLLI- ~ iii C o II :S! II s~ "'0 lXl"'''' -CIO ON ",. o O,..N 0'" N. "'0 alal _ N O. N . o 00 00 o "'N 0'" N. "'0 CIOCIO CION alltl o 00 00 O,..N 0'" N. -0 CIOCIO CION allll o 00 00 0"'''' 0'" N"" "'0 CIOCIO !llll o 00 00 0"'''' 0'" N..., "'0 CIOal CION allll o 00 00 0"'''' 0'" N"" -0 CIOal CION allll o 00 00 O,..ID ON NIll -0 CIOal CION allll o 00 00 U -ID "',.. "'Ill "'0 CION CIO..., al'" o lXl ,.. al CIO. CIOItl NO Oal ~15 '" " o 00 00 USlI N. ...,. o "'al CIO. CIOItl NO 00 00 U Ill'" IDCIO "',.. NO CIOO N N Oltl "'0 00 00 U-Ill ,..- Oltl .0 8!; N'" ...~ OIC1O 01'" CIOItl "'c ~8 ""0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 88~ 1.01.0~ 888 888 888 888 888 888 888 88~ ~~S ~S. ~~::l ~:g:g 00"': ..- CO"C coc CCC ooc oco ccci cicici "':"':0 cci"': .ciN .":"': ":cio ~("),.,,... NN~fi')"'::NN"'N",G)NNN !C~ lXl8~ O~~ o~~ o~~ o~~ o~~ o~~ o~~ u~~ lXll;lO lXl~~ w~~ lXl~~ ~~ C~ :;J~ :;J::E :;J~ :;J::E :;J::E :;J::E :;J~ :~ :;J~ C~ o~ c::E ~O~ ~o~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ a~~ ~~~ ;~~ ~~~ oeo 000 ON'" ON(f) ON'" ONe') ONe') ON'" ON'" 0"'''' 0"'1") 0...... 0.....,. 0...... ...Oltl ItlN CIOal "'0 NOItl ItlN CIOal "'0 08\!3 CIOal "'ci CI~~ "'ci o ~ ~ 0 i ~ 0) ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ CI ~ ~ - ~ ~ - ~ ~ ... ~ ~ - ~ ~ - ~ ~ ....c "'0 "'0 "'0 "'0 "'c ....0 ....0 "'0 "'0 :I: Q :I: Q :I: Q :I: Q ::I: Q ::I: Q :I: Q :I: Q :I: Q ::I: Q :I: Q :I: : :I: : :I: : .... .... .... "'N ... 0_0 01 o o .N - Itl~ Itl~ Itl~ Ill~ Itl~ Itl'" - Ill~ NN - NN - NN - N N - N N - m...~M-NM...N~...N~_(")~...,.,~..."'.._~~...~N_..,..._~,...:~,..._~ o 01 '" '" 01 N '" gill'" gill. al N . gill'" al N ,.. al '" CIO g Iii 0 g ~ '" 01 Q '" w. 01 '" l!l g ~~CIO~~Itl~ci ~ci ~~Itl~o ~~ltlm~lD~c_~ci_~~N~~~~ciN o 8ii!! ~i!! ~i!! 8li!! ~i!! ~i!! ~i!! al CIO . lD Itl ... N N I- ~ ~ N ?- m 8 LL ~ 8 LL e.e.~0C! a:C!C! a:C!C! a:oo a:C!C! a:C!C! a:C!C! a:C!C! a:oo a:oo a:C!C! a:C!C! a:C!C! a:C!0 01 U150 uoo ucc uoo UIi!O UIi!O u:;:o ugc I/)!CO 1/)00 1/)00 I/)~O I/)~O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ OO:g::>OClO::> III :g C C -~ ci ::> -~ ::> C "N~ NN~ NN~ N"~ N"'~ _CIO :g ci ::> N ~ ::> ci -18 ::> III ci NN Ii! N N Ii! ...CIO :g ci ::>_CIO :g ci O"'CIO ::>-CIO O-CIO ONCIO O"'CIO :g :g :g :g :g ci ci C ci ci ... Nan.. N It) . '" ...NU') ..Nil) "'NY') . ... ... ~O~ m08 ~08 ~08 ~08 Pl08 \!308 11108 ::::08 ~o~ !l08 ::l08 11108 ~o~ ........0.,..;0.,..;0 ~Q...:O...:O...:O,...:O...:.........O...:O...;O...:..... Z iiial -.='" lXliil/) >-N ::> ~ 10 Cl o Ol II> ,.. ,,~ a: '" ~J! ii5.!il - -i i .! /D J: ~ C III !! Cl CI :g '" iiiiii - 0 ~.~ ] 1" " ~LLe. Il o 8 ~ iii >~u; <]1 1 " ~ ~ e. 0 ~ Cl S! ... '" ~.'. iii ." _ C >I/).!! < 1 III ~~.I ~ou i o o N ~ N",O '" iii ." c_ >.!! I/) <1Il'C: 1.1 g ~uu Il o o '" ... '" -" ~I/)a: li:sl o 2 uo C I o o . ~ ." a: ~ ~.I ,,:sl ~ ~ = ... ~ .. 0-, C III i!! Cl o III ~ NNO I') ." a:o ~.I ~ l~j Il ~ o ~ o lD ~ 8 . ~ ~." /D C "'.!! '" '" ..- e. i!! '" = . '" C .. .= III .SJ.: .II .!!! !ii5 ::0... '" = :Cl t=~ ii5 "" = Cl o . ~ ." a: ::l > .. <e. .=" -,i ~/D as .. = Cl o N . N - ~o fJ~ ~i :i = /DC> ii5 lo: = Cl :;: ... N - o '" ." >- J ~ = it Cl/D ii5 lo: = Cl o . . N ..... It) 1i C .S! Q. III U )( W II lD ~ ~ .. l5 > .. LL :J:o .= "~ J: II ~ i ~ 5! !! III ~ ~ ~!e ~I=; E~ If -8 if ...,. Ii 110> a: I').E .!!. ."..~ '"' Ill"" .i 10 [11 ~~!! ~~t; J! E "'. :5J;; ~~~ ....1~ 81ilf? e.':N ~l.l . 1Il':H3 ::-U ..... i:i II ~~: l;"l:1Il <13< 'IIi( .)( '6 I:: CII ~ 'IIi( 1i ~ a: II III N N Itl '" I iii .S ::E Ii 1i ;a = o Z ~ t .5i! ~ :E C ::> III C .!! ! ~j ...:~ ., . =c ::E.c c::> .e ~ ::>.!! II ' "'. i :it; a;CIO en 't:__ :! <a: ~ ~~ II LL .. ~ -e & . ii II I/) N,.. U '. it il · Il::> !t: ~ '0 . 'l;z ,. - II "5! .. '" OJ ~ Ii: ~~ ~ Z I I I/) ll. .5 g. t3 ",Ull. ~ ll.:> g.~ U U ~ ~ I/) > .10 ~ ~< ]11 ~n. ~~ ll:... "Oll. ~"O ll.~ log .c: - Q) Ii ttl r- I "0 "'"- 1/)"0 I! C) a..1: Jfl/)~ ,gu u;~Ci "t:l .9 ~ cl; o Cl .c: e -- ~ ~ ~ Q) J:...I U ~ >~O' en u- t) I/) I/) ~8.8. :I: _ >- >- o~~ ~13~ ::l]LL .!iLLJ: U_ll. 'I: .. e{1/) .~] ~ 2:0:5 U .. !11 ., ciCI/) I I I I I ~ I/) LL E e{.= u~ I '0 b8~ <-J: e{~... ll. ., ~~ .,. := 0 c ,9, > > ., It I .Il!'" N ~CI)VJ -, U U I ., .52> U Q. "', af ~~C' I '" ~ ., .. e ., . ......1 ...Ie{]. I/) I =~a:: ",I/) := e 't:' E ~ IV '" ll.ll. I I E _ e 0 "LL~ ~ Ci) e o I ~ I C -- ~~ NO 00 00 C "'Ill ..,IIl ..,.., N . o OCD "'Ill ....., NO 00 00 C "'N -... Ill.., NO N'" ..,... 0> III -0 00 00 U _N III 'Of CIOCD -0 -0 C; N 00 00 ID i:;; ..,IIl -0 ~i "'CD -0 00 00 I~~ ~~:g ~;~ ~~: II: .,;...;.... al'iU>M anNcn OOP; ...;.,..;,.; __N'" ___U') ......CD NNCD ,..,"'~ u ii ..,CD -0 0'" CIOIIl ..,IIl -0 00 00 "''''0 "'NCIO O"';.fi NNCIO U ON CI00 ..,CIO -0 _CIO NO ..,... -0 00 00 CON CI00 'OfClO -0 -Ill N'" ..,00 -0 00 00 CON 000 ..,CIO -0 NOO Ill'" ,",00 -0 00 00 C"'IIl OCD N'" -0 "'0 ...- III 0 N 00 00 C....., ON N.., -0 ~:! 00> -0 00 00 C"'''' ON N'Of -0 E~ -0 00 00 C"'''' ON N.., -0 E~ -0 00 00 ID '" 0 -'" 0- "'0 E~ -0 0>'" _0> 0- NO 00 00 \:;u;~ ~~; ~~li 888 888 888 888 :;O:;Olri ~~c;; ::~i ::~i Qce 000 ceo ceo ~~~ N~~ N~~ CIOO> 000> .. 0 ... 0 N~ ~ ~ u > e{"O "'ll: .!I! ., ~ i ., ., "OJ:~ ll: :5! := C i N .., ....0 III IIlN CIOO> -0 N~ m ~ u "0 a:: > .,e{ e ., .,... ., .. "O~...I a:: :51 := C 8 .., '" ....011) II) N CIOO> ....0 N~ ~ ~ U NNIi! NNIi! NNIi! NNfil ~ >"0 e{ e .,.lP "Ii> "O...IJ: ll: :51 := C ~ '" .., 08~ 08~ 08~ 08\(l cO> CIOO> CIOO> cO> "'0 "'0 "'0 ....0 IIl~ ~ ~ ...I U NNO '" ~~ "0,:: C := .1'1 0 -= I/) "Of:i a:: :5! := C o N '" '" IIl~ g e: ~ u NNII) .., ~ ~1 S t ~ - .10 Cl "O~z a:: :!2 ~ o '" '" .., IIl~ 10 ~ ~ ...I U NNIIl 'Of ~ ] ~ - .,1/) ~~ Cl "Ozf a:: :!2 := C o 'Of '" '" IIl~ ~E~~E~~E!~;~;E~~i~ii~ii~ig~~g~~i~~i~~g~ ~o-Eo-~o....~~~5o ~o"'~o"'~o"'~c-~o ~c ~o ~o NOli) IIlN CO> -0 NN - ~ ~ u N~~ CIOO> ....0 N~ ~ ~ U ..,....Ii! "'-Ii! ~ 1- :1/) _.!I! Cl'l: _zf I/) 1 c o .., N '" ~ e o Ci) 'E .!I! ." 'l:J: _fit I/) 1 c ~ N .., NOli) IIlN CIOO> ....0 N~ ~ ~ u N....O .., > e{- el/) 0"0 .rl C ci ." > J:.!I! _ii:u I/) 1 c o CD N '" ....Olll IIlN CIOO> ....0 N N - ~ ~ ...I U NNO 'Of "0 a:: ~j I/).ll "O;:).! a:: :!2 := IS o ... N .., N~ i ~ u "O~ a:: I/) -.!I! ., := ~ E ., G> "OIDJ: a:: :51 := C i N '" E ~ u NNII) 'Of > e{ c o in .! .!I! Ii 'l:J: "0 fit a:: :!2 2 C o II) '" .., U!~ C~~ w~~ U~~ ID!~ U!~ U!~ C!~ W!~ C~~ ~~~ C~~ C~~ ID~~ if6~ ;~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ m~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~O~ 0-.... c-'" 0...... 0...... 0-" 0..... 0...... ON'" ON'" ON'" ON'" ON" ON'" oce ....011) II)N CO> -0 ~ ~ ~ C C ~ ~ :E: M :E: M :E: M :E: C :E: C :E: 1ft :E: 1ft :E: ~ :E: ~ :E: C :E: C :E: C :E: C :E: C ..,~ ~~~ .., 0 ... - .... 115~~ 115;~ 115g~ dg~ d~~ d~~ d~~ d~~ d~~ d~~ dg~ dg~ dg~ 5~~ N N N N N NN N N N ~ M ~ M ~ ~ M M ~ ,.., MM ~ M M '" M ,.., M ... ;:)....m ;:)....m ;:)Nm ;:)-m c....m ;:)....m ;:)....m ;:)-~ ;:)-~ ;:)-~ ;:)-m ;:)-m ;:)-m ;:)Om o 000 0 coo 0 0 0 0 C 0 NNO '" ~C8 ~C8 ~C8 \:;C8 ~c~ ~C8 lfiC8 ~C8 \(lC8 ~C8 ::;C8 \(lC8 ::3C8 iiiC8 0"':0"";0"';0"':''''...0''':0'':0'':0'':0'':0'':0'':0'':0 ..: "0- a:: I/) . I/) ~~ 0.1'1 ~'::Cl ;; 5 ?l CD .., f't ll) I NOlll IIlN lOCI> -0 NN - a:: ~ u 'Of-Ill .., ~ ~l . c 8 ~ ~Cl _~z I/) 1 c o '"' N '"' ~ ~ "t) c: CD ii ~ .~ .q: Q. Il U 'k W " CD .!I!' .c .. ~ > .. LL 2:0 ii ~ ~ f I. ~ ~ ~ !. .c R !! ~ ~ ~ ~ I~"! 'Of....:= e'i 11f .g.!! ~ li~ cO a::'" .E a ,e ..,],s .i1ii~ .D-=ca !~.= ~.~ A ~ I) co. ;:)Yl.! J!..N$ .:i~ 8iii'i? ll.,aN ~u ' ~1g II -u ~ ~:. e:... iO ~13~ I I I I I I I I I ! I Ci) ~ .E ~ Ii ii 'Iii C o Z ~ t R ~ :E e ;:) Il e .1'1 ! ~~ .-:- LL -S..; ~~ e;:) .e ~ ;:)s Jf,.. i -~ .~ ~ Kl'l:.": :! c(.. ~ ]~ " LL" ~ 'E & ii n en N po.. ~ fl- " ~;:) ~ It ~ ~ " ..1 .:.; CD hila: l)~ U Z '1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I "0 o J::. - CIl :2 Vl CIl :c ell ~ III Cl ..5 !t 5 ""UCl :Cl:> !t~ U U ~ If'. Ul> .! m -=lee ~~ Gl ~ ~Cl I-~ a::"" ~Cl ~~ Cl~ ~ ~:; ~ "" Q..- :Ull- ~~ u;a::" "0 ..5 ~ cii o "t: :5 l-ij.5 CIl :tool U :2 >~u C/) III U cii () III Gl Gl J:~!::!:: o~t: ~_. i!"Uc( l;1i:u.. .. ~ :t U~Cl "l:: .. c(Ul .~ ~ 0 ~i z l ~ ~ I- III u..E c(" u~ 15 b8~ c(-:t c(:lI::"" Cl Gl !:S E 5~> Vl>- u.. .~ _ N "VlUl -,UU Gl.1l> ~ !:: ~I u.., I-zo III = Gl .. E ell::; ..5Cf-c Q. Ul =~-= "" Ul " i -:1 ~ -'~Cl E _ e 0 Glu..1- ~ Iii t: o :s2 U "'Ill 10'" _N '" . o 00 00 o filS ~Ill -0 a> - -Ill -'" NO 00 00 ~ If) '" 0 III a> .- ,....,.... ,.... CD t") N ..; en ..;":' vi N r')'" ....... ClCI 00'" ~lll -0 _0 o N 00 00 0- a> 1'-- ~ ~ ~ ~ - u-- al\13 NO 18lll _10 -0 00 00 a:> a:> NN .0.0 -- 0"'- NN a> III "'0 a:>~ Na> IllN NO 00 00 ::g:g:~ _cOco) U') ~... c o -a> a> a:> III I'- NO .~ a> 10 NO 00 00 a>_a> Na:> III ,..:..&ri __10 0\;;18 a>~ "'0 a>o a:>N -I'- -..; o 0 00 u.. N~ alUi -0 "'10 ~a:> "'~ '" . o 00 00 u.. NI'- ..,.., III a:> -0 -$! o N 00 00 -a> lS~ -..; 00 00 E~ "'0 E~ NO 00 00 ::!~ ~. o lD '" ~ Ill'" III III "'0 "'~ Itl'" Itllll "'0 00 00 E~ "'0 Ol'-N 01'- NIll -0 lDS!!? WOO OO!? UOO O~O WOO 000 11..00 II..~O c~ ~Cl ~~ ~Cl IllCl IllCl ~Cl "'Cl ~Cl O~ o~ O~ o~ O~ ~~ ~~ ~~ O~ E~ NO 00 00 E~ NO ....., a:> 0> ..,10 o ~~ O~ ,.~ ~ ~ O~ c(fil~ ~~ 00 00 ~~15 ~~; ~~~ 88$! 881218~~ 88~ 888 ==~~ :::::e ::::1 OO~ OO~ ~~o; OO~ 000 _Oltl IllN a:> 0> -0 N "'It X N N - N III Itl ~-~ ~ '8 ~Iii Iii~~ It';f' .I! Gl } U o ;;; N -Ill \13 a:>Cl> -0 N "'It X NN - i '" N_O '" _0> 1Il- Iii~~ ~ >-- t:~c( .. li } U o N .., N -0 III ItlN GOO> -0 N ~ X N~ ~ ~ ..J U d:;:; d:;:; d:;:; dC!o a::C!0 a:: 0 0 a::C!C! a:: 0 0 a::C!C! I'- I'- I'- go lIlio IIlgo Uli~ 1Il~0 1Il~0 ~ m c ClCI ClCI m mm m m N N N N N N NN N N NOItl ItlN ....., -0 "'It "'It X N N - ~ ~ ..J U NNItl '" ~ ~1 -Gl.l! ~~j t:..J:t .. li } u o I'- a:> N NOItl ItlN GOO> -0 It) ~ X N N - ~ ~ U Nlll\13 a:>Cl> -0 It) ~ :l: N~ ~ ~ ..J U _Oltl IllN a:>.., -0 ClXClX NN - m ~ U NNan ....NU') ......U') '" '" '" ~ a:: > Glc( - t: III III Ill... ~ III III t::lI::..J .Ii III } U N I'- GO N ~ ~ ~/lil _.li~ U).. ~R>" t: :t " .I! III } U o a:> a:> N iii ~~ G?"t: o " iij ~ ~ ~"J/l t:"~ .I! III } U !i: a:> N -Ill \13 GOO> -0 N N - i ~ ..J U ~-O '" ~ ~] - g ~ III III III ~.1Il ~ t: ~ " .I! III } U ~ N N _Itl ~ III U .Ii O>Cl -~ Iii ~ i ]:fcs .I! '" } U o '" .., N -Ill \13 a:>Cl> -0 N Cl X Cl CO) ~N - M_"- c")_", C")...... ('1)-", ,....-U') ,....-11') f"')_1t) 0)-'" !I)-CO 0-0 ~g~~~~~0~~.5g~~8~~g~~8~~g2mg~ ~ COo COo 0 ~oN~c:iN~o-~ci-~o- ci 8 '" Q.OO III vi 0 a:> .., $! NNItl N z . >0 .=c(.: ~ ~ U '0 ~ : ClNlD III : o U Itl a:> .., $! _Oltl ItlN GO.., -0 :l: ~~ _Oltl ItlN GOO> -0 Cl X N N - C-OeD"'''''' 0> ~..,O> o a:>oa:> o ~ 0"" o o ClOO a:: 0 0 Ulgo IIlgo CIO N I'- a:> NNO '" iii -t:c: ~~ts > 0 c( c(~1ll '5 ~ 0 80ili III t: t: o U i GO I'- OO~ ON~ ON~ ::l-m ON~ O-~ o-~ O"'~ o-m ::lCl~ ::l0~ 0 coo 000 0 0 0 0 0 ~Nlll ~ C- a:: ,fc~ ~IllCl t] :i ~lIllD e- o U o Itl N a:> _0 III ItlN a:> 0> -0 10 en X ~~ o~ O~O ",Cl o~ ~o~ ~~~ ~N'~~ 1Il$!~~~ ~o'~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ 80~ ~o~ ~GO'~~ ~o~ ~o'~~ g ~ ~-~ N III M ~ ~ l!i ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ 000 0-(") 0...", 0-... 0-"" c-... 0-'" 0-'" 0-'" ooe cec 0...... 000 CNt") -Oltl IllN a:>.., -0 :l: ~N - ~ U N N Itl '" ~N - 08\13 a:>.., -0 Cl Cl X ItlIO - 0;;0 :gc;;;; o Itl 010 o "'0 III ~ ~ ,g_t: .ii!1Il~ u""'. ~ /Ii " C = o U o a:> I'- a:> o 0 Q. ~ a:: 0 0 u~o ~ _GO 10 Itl o NNItl ~ ~O~ ~oa &108 l!30a ~OB ~OB ~OB ~08 NOB ~08 ~OB aoa ~oa !;!OB o ~ 0 ~ c:i ~ 0 .... 0 ..: 0 ..: c ..: 0 ..: 0 ..: ci .; 0 ....:... ...... ... 0 ..: "" .., ~ ClClO III 0 0 a:> I'- a:> _GO 18 o ::l o:g ::l Itl o > c(~ III a:: J! III en ~ ~ ~ III III t::t:ll:: .I! III > J! U o 10 a:> N NNItl '" III "" o Ill~ "a:: iiiliij ~~:; ~-' u C " o U III '" - CIl) ... I i'i t: .S/ Q. III U )( W " CD .i ,g l! o > ce II.. .?:- .: .!2> :t " ~ t ,g ~ !! ~ o III 1; 0 'tr.! e ~I-" e'ilf i if~- ~A.~ A -o.~ III = .i7i~ .&J=~ ~~~ ,,; 'pl. t: III t: ::llf,'.l!l ~N= ....t.g 8..1f,' Cl.:N ~ U . ~~f6 II~() ~ ~~ !::I- ;,; 1:"'::11> eeuee 'C( .)( '6 t: QI 8: 'C( I - I i'i 3 a:: II III I I I I I I I'- 0> N ~ ~ Iii o .e ~ Ii 1i 'iii C: o Z " Itl i ~ u. "E c: ::l G> t: .Ii $ ~j ..: II.. - . ~~ t:::l .e ~ :lJ! A. i -I- .~ &, j "l::..: .c c( 'S ~ j~ " u.. .. r 'E & . ii II III NI'- u >-0. ~ ~ &: II Ill::l !t ~ 15 . Ij;z -g ~J, 0;= t: ~~ 5 z I I I I I I I I I I I HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.1c ~ter: Drew St. & Greenwood Ave.. Analyst: King if.te: 5/23/(](] I'W St: Drew Street City/St: Clearwater Proj #: 152(].(](]1.(](](] Period: PM Peak N/S St: Greenwood Avenue SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound 1 Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I I I I I' Lanes 1 (] 2 (] I (] 2 (] I (] 1 (] 1 (] 1 (] ,Config I LTR I LTR I LTR I LTR Volume 114 763 21 125 465 58 125 226 59 135 152 12 Ine Width I 12.(] I 12.(] I 12.(] I 12.(] OR Vol 1 (] I (] I (] 1 (] Iration (].25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations ase Comblnatlon 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 i Left P NB Left P Thru P Thru P Right P Right P Peds Peds r Left P SB Left P Thru P Thru P Right P Right P I Peds Peds Right EB Right SB Right WB Right loon 25.(] 25.(] llow 4.(] 4.(] I Red 1.(] 1.(] .e10 Longth: 6(].(] secs I I I I I I I I Ipr/ Cane p Lane Group Capacity Intersection Performance Summary Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Flow Rate (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Approach Delay LOS stbound tR 1407 3376 0.71 0.417 17.5 B 17.5 B Westbound IR 1302 3126 0.53 0.417 14.6 B 14.6 B rrthbound ~R 635 luthbound 1523 0.61 0.417 18.0 B 18.0 B LTR I I 598 1435 0.42 0.417 14.5 B 14.5 B Intersection Delay = 16.4 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.1c Systems Administrator Ifng Engineering Associates, Inc. aone: ~~Mai 1: Fax: OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Itersection: City/State: ,alyst: oject No: Time Period Analyzed: Ite: st/West Street Name: orth/South Street Name: Drew St. & Greenwood Ave.. Clearwater King 1520.001.000 PM Peak 5/23/00 Drew Street Greenwood Avenue I I I I I I I VOLUME DATA Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R 14 763 21 25 465 58 25 226 59 35 152 12 [J.8[J [J.8[J [J.8[J [J.8[J [J.8[J [J.8[J [J.8[J [J.8[J [J.8[J [J.8[J [J.8[J [J.8[J 4 238 7 8 145 18 8 71 18 11 47 4 [J [J [J [J 19[J[J 19[J[J 19[J[J 19[J[J [J [J [J [J [J [J [J 5 [J [J 5 [J [J 2 [J [J 2 [J [J 1 [J [J 1 [J LTR LTR LTR LTR 12.[J 12.[J 12.[J 12.[J [J [J [J [J 997 684 387 249 [J.[J2 [J.[J3 [J.[J5 [J.ll [J.[J8 [J.19 [J.18 [J.[J6 [J [J [J [J [J [J [J [J [J.25 Area Type: All other areas Ilume PHF I 15 Vol Ln Vol % Grade leal Sat rkExist umPark IHeaVy Veh . Lanes Config Lane Width lOR Vol j Flow %InSharedLn lop Turns mPeds NumBus IJration I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Eastbound I L T R lit I Unmet I 0.0 Arriv. Typel 3 lit Ext. I 3.0 Factor I 1.000 Lost Time I 2.0 It of g I 2.0 d Min g I 3.0 1lase Combination 1 2 t Left P Thru P Right P I Peds W8 Left P I Thru P Right P Peds I Right r Right Green 25.0 IllOW 4.0 1 Red 1.[] ItCle Length: 60.0 secs I I I I I OPERATING PARAMETERS Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R 0.0 0.0 0.0 3 3 3 3.0 3.0 3.0 1.000 1.000 1.000 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 PHASE DATA 3 4 5 6 7 8 N8 Left P Thru P Right P Peds S8 Left P Thru P Right P Peds E8 Right W8 Right 25.0 4.0 1.[] I I I VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Adjusted Prop. Prop. Ipr./ Mvt Flow No. Lane Flow Rate Left Right vement Volume PHF Rate Lanes Group RTOR In Lane Grp Turns Turns Eastbound I Left 14 0.80 17 0 Thru 763 0.80 954 2 LTR 997 0.02 0.03 Right 21 0.80 26 0 0 Istbound Left 25 0.80 31 0 I Thru 465 0.80 581 2 LTR 684 0.05 0.11 Right 58 0.80 72 0 0 rrthbound Left 25 0.80 31 0 Thru 226 0.80 282 1 LTR 387 0.08 0.19 Right 59 0.80 74 0 0 luthbound Left 35 0.80 44 0 I Thru 152 0.80 190 1 LTR 249 0.18 0.06 Right 12 0.80 15 0 0 Ivalue entered by user. I I I I I I I I I I Iprl SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Ideal Adj Lane Sat f f f f f f f f f Sat loup Flow W HV G P BB A LU RT LT Flow Eastbound See LT Adj/LT Sat: IR 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 0.95 0.996 0.939 3376 Istbound See LT Adj/LT Sat: WR 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 0.95 0.984 0.880 3126 jrthbound R 1900 1.000 0.952 1.000 See LT Adj/LT Sat: 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 0.874 0.962 1523 luthbound rR , I I I I I I I I I See LT Adj/LT Sat: 1900 1.000 0.952 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 0.892 0.889 1435 I. I 1 Apprl Lane Mvmt Group Istbound Pri. I Sec. Left Thru I Right stbound Pri. I Sec. Left I Thru L TR Right Irthbound Pri. Sec. I Left Thru Right luthbound Pri. Sec. I Left Thru Right LTR LTR LTR 1st I I I I I I I Time/Cycle, L = Adj Flow Rate (v) 997 684 387 249 1[].[][] sec CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Adj Sat Flow Green Flow Rate Ratio Ratio (s) (vIs) (g/C) 3376 # [].3[] [].417 3126 [].22 [].417 1523 # [].25 [].417 1435 [].17 [].417 Sum (vIs) critical = [].55 Critical v/c(X) = [].66 --Lane Group-- Capacity vlc (c) Ratio 14[]7 [].71 13[]2 [].53 635 [].61 598 [].42 I I Iprl Ratios ne Grp v/c g/C Istbound LEVEL OF Prog Lane Adj Grp Fact Cap Unf Del d1 rR 0.71 Westbound IR 0.53 0.417 14.5 1.000 1407 0.417 13.1 1.000 1302 trthbound ~R 0.61 0.417 13.7 1.000 635 tuthbound LTR 0.42 I I I I I I I I I I I 0.417 12.4 1.000 598 SERVICE WORKSHEET Incremental Res Factor Del Del k d2 d3 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 2.1 Intersection Delay = 16.4 (sec/veh) Lane Group Delay LOS Approach Delay LOS 3.0 0.0 1.5 0.0 4.3 0.0 0.0 17.5 8 17.5 8 14.6 8 14.6 8 18.0 8 18.0 8 14.5 8 14.5 8 Intersection LOS = 8 I. I I SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET for exclusive lefts IAPPROACH cle Length, C 60.0 sec Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G Ifective Green Time for Lane Group, 9 posing Effective Green Time, go Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N Imber of Opposing Lanes, No justed Left-Turn Flow Rate, Vlt roportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Plto _jUsted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo st Time for Lane Group, tl ft Turns per Cycle: LTC=VltC/3600 .posing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc=VoC/3600fluo posing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) =[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b))]-tl, gf<=g Opposing Queue Ratio: qro=l-Rpo(go/C) ~=(4.943~01c**0.762)(qro*~1.061)-tl, gq<=g ~ =g-gq If gq>=gf, =g-gf If gq<gf n=(gq-gf)/2, n>=O ~hO=l-Plto *=Plt[1+{(N-1)g/(gf+gu/El1+4.24)}] 11 (Figure 9-7) 12=(1-ptho**n)/Plto, E12>=1.0 in=2(1+Plt)/g or fmin=2(1+Pl)/g iff=max(gq-gf,O) fm=[gf/gl+[gu/g][1/{1+Pl(El1-1)}], (min=fminimax=1.00) It=fm=[gf/9]+9diff[1/{1+Plt(E12-1)}] gu/g][1/(1+Plt(El1-1)],(min=fminimax=1.0) or flt=[fm+0.91(N-1)l/N** fIt I For special case of single-lane approach opposed by multilane approach, ,e text. If Pl>=l for shared left-turn lanes with N>l, then assume de-facto left-turn lane and redo calculations. I For permitted left-turns with multiple exclusive left-turn lanes, flt=fm. r special case of multilane approach opposed by single-lane approach when gf>gq, see text. EB WB NB SB I I I I I I I SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET for shared lefts IAPPROACH cle Length, C 60.0 sec Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G Ifective Green Time for Lane Group, 9 posing Effective Green Time, go Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N Imber of Opposing Lanes, No justed Left-Turn Flow Rate, Vlt roportion of Left Turns in Lane Group, PIt loportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Plto justed Opposing Flow Rate, Vo st Time for Lane Group, tl Left Turns per Cycle: LTC=VltC/3600 tpoSing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc=VoC/3600fluo posing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) gf=[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b))]-tl, gf<=g IPosing Queue Ratio: qro=l-Rpo(go/C) =(4.943Volc**0.762)(qro**1.061)-tl, gq<=g gu =g-gq if gq>=gf, =g-gf if gq<gf l(9q-9f)/2, n>=O ho=l-Plto *=Plt[1+{(N-l)g/(gf+gu/Ell+4.24))) 11 (Figure 9-7) 2=(1-Ptho**n)/Plto, E12>=1.0 in=2(1+Plt)/g or fmin=2(1+Pl)/g iiff=maX(gq-9f,0) =[gf/g]+[gu/g][l/{l+Pl(Ell-l)}], (min=fmin;max=1.00) t=fm=[gf/gl+gdiff[1/{1+Plt(E12-1)}] +[gu/gl[1/(1+Plt(Ell-l)],(min=fmin;max=1.0) or flt=[fm+0.91(N-l)]/N** I fIt Primary 0.939 0.880 0.962 EB 25.0 25.0 25.0 2 2 17 0.02 0.05 684 5.00 0.28 6.00 1.00 12.5 0.58 3.75 12.51 0.00 0.95 0.04 2.85 1.00 0.08 0.00 0.97 WB 25.0 25.0 25.0 2 2 31 0.05 0.02 997 5.00 0.52 8.75 1.00 9.4 0.58 9.40 15.57 0.00 0.98 0.11 3.91 1.00 0.09 0.00 0.85 NB 25.0 25.0 25.0 1 1 31 0.08 0.18 249 5.00 0.52 4.15 1.00 9.2 0.58 3.25 15.83 0.00 0.82 0.08 1.79 1.00 0.09 0.00 0.96 SB 25.0 25.0 25.0 1 1 44 0.18 0.08 387 5.00 0.73 6.45 1.00 7.3 0.58 6.55 17.68 0.00 0.92 0.18 2.05 1.00 0.09 0.00 0.89 0.889 Ir special case of single-lane approach opposed by multilane approach, e text. * If Pl>=l for shared left-turn lanes with N>l, then assume de-facto left-turn lane and redo calculations. IL For permitted left-turns with multiple exclusive left-turn lanes, flt=fm. ~r special case of multilane approach opposed by single-lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. I I I I I I I SUPPLEMENTAL UNIFORM DELAY WORKSHEET tj. LT Vol from Vol Adjustment Worksheet, v Vc ratio from Capacity Worksheet, X Primary phase effective green, g ~condary phase effective green, gq Itrom Supplemental Permitted LT Worksheet), gu Cycle length, C 60.0 Red =(C-g-gq-gu), r (rivals: v/(3600(max(X,1.0))), qa imary ph. departures: s/3600, sp Secondary ph. departures: s(gq+gu)/(gu*3600), ss I~~~ ~ase leue at beginning of green arrow, Qa eue at beginning of unsaturated green, Qu sidual queue, Qr Uniform Delay, d1 I Initial Unmet Demand Q veh Ipr/ Lane ("UP astbound I ,stbound I Northbound I luthbound I I I DELAY/LOS WORKSHEET WITH INITIAL QUEUE Dur. Unmet Demand t hrs. Uniform Delay Unadj. Adj. ds d1 sec Initial Queue Paramo u Final Unmet Demand Q veh EBLT NBLT SBLT WBLT Initial Queue Delay d3 sec Lane Group Delay d sec Intersection Delay 16.4 sec/veh Intersection LOS B I I ater: Cleveland P~alyst: King ifte: 5/24/00 IW St: Cleveland HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.1c St. & Greenwood Ave. City/St: Proj #: Period: N/S St: Clearwater 1520.001.000 PM Peak Greenwood Avenue Street SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I 1 Eastbound I Westbound 1 Northbound I Southbound 1 L T R 1 L T R 1 L T R I L T R I I 1 1 I. Lanes I 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 Config 1 L TR 1 L TR I L TR I L TR Volume 132 767 10 127 685 27 119 239 57 196 165 18 fne Width 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.[] 112.0 12.0 OR Vol I 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 ~ration 0.25 ~ase Combination 1 EB Left P I Thru P Right P Peds r Left Thru Right I Peds Right Right ~~~~w K I Red Cycle Length: I I I I I I I Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations 234 7 8 5 P P P 6 P P P NB Left Thru Right Peds SB Left Thru Right Peds EB Right WB Right P P P 25.0 4.0 1.0 60.0 25.0 4.[] 1.0 secs I I ipr/ ane rp Intersection Performance Summary Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Flow Rate (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Lane Group Capacity stbound 202 1501 486 0.18 0.417 13.0 B 3603 0.60 0.417 15.4 B 417 0.18 0.417 13.3 B 3590 0.55 0.417 14.7 B 1187 0.04 0.417 10.6 B 1757 0.47 0.417 14.9 B L r Westbound . 174 . 1496 Irthbound 495 732 tuthbound 381 TR 743 I I . . Systems Admlnlstrator ling Engineering Associates, Inc. 915 1783 0.29 0.29 0.417 0.417 13.6 12.6 B B Intersection Delay = 14.7 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B Approach Delay LOS 15.3 B 14.7 B 14.6 B 12.9 B HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.1c lone: Mail: Fax: OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Itersection: City/State: I"alyst: "oject No: Time Period Analyzed: Ite: st/West Street Name: orth/South Street Name: Cleveland St. & Greenwood Ave. Clearwater King 1520.001.000 PM Peak 5/24/00 Cleveland Street Greenwood Avenue I I I I I I I VOLUME DATA Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R 32 767 10 27 685 27 19 239 57 96 165 18 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 9 223 3 8 199 8 6 69 17 28 48 5 0 0 0 0 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 L TR L TR L TR L TR 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 0 0 0 0 37 904 31 828 22 344 112 213 0.01 0.04 0.19 0.10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Ilume PHF I 15 Vol Ln Vol % Grade leal Sat rkExist NumPark _. Heavy Veh . Lanes Config ~ne Width OR Vol j Flow %InSharedLn lop Turns mPeds NumBus Iration I I I I I I I I I I I I I Eastbound I L T R lit 1 Unmet 10.0 0.0 Arriv. Typel3 3 fit Ext. 13.0 3.0 Factor I 1.000 Lost Time 12.0 2.0 It of g 12.0 2.0 d Min g 1 3.0 llase Combination 1 2 t Left P Thru P Right P I Peds WB Left P I Thru P Right P Peds I Right j Right Green 25.0 IIIOW 4.0 1 Red 1.0 OPERATING PARAMETERS 1 Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R I I 1 10.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 13 3 13 3 13 3 13.0 3.0 13.0 3.0 13.0 3.0 I 1.000 1 1.000 I 1.000 12.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 I 3.0 I 3.0 I 3.0 PHASE DATA 3 4 5 6 7 8 NB Left P Thru P Right P Peds SB Left P Thru P Right P Peds EB Right WB Right 25.0 4.0 1.0 Ircle Length: 60.0 secs I I I I I I I I VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Adjusted Prop. Prop. .pro; Mvt Flow No. Lane Flow Rate Left Right vement Volume PHF Rate Lanes Group RTOR In Lane Grp Turns Turns Eastbound I Left 32 0.86 37 1 L 37 Thru 767 0.86 892 2 TR 904 0.01 Right 10 0.86 12 0 0 Istbound 27 0.86 31 1 Left L 31 I Thru 685 0.86 797 2 TR 828 0.04 Right 27 0.86 31 0 0 Northbound I Left 19 0.86 22 1 L 22 Thru 239 0.86 278 1 TR 344 0.19 Right 57 0.86 66 0 0 luthbound Left 96 0.86 112 1 L 112 I Thru 165 0.86 192 1 TR 213 0.10 Right 18 0.86 21 0 0 _ Value entered by user. I I I I I I I I I I Iprl Ideal W~~p ~~~w Eastbound I 1900 1900 SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Adj f f f f f f f f f Sat W HV G P BB A LU RT LT Flow See LT Adj/LT Sat: 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 0.256 486 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 0.95 0.998 1.000 3603 See LT Adj/LT Sat: 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 0.220 417 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 0.95 0.994 1.000 3590 See LT Adj/LT Sat: 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 0.625 1187 1.000 0.952 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 0.971 1.000 1757 See LT Adj/LT Sat: 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 0.482 915 1.000 0.952 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 0.985 1.000 1783 'stbound L 1900 I 1900 Irthbound 1900 , 1900 luthbound L 1900 I 1900 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 Apprl Lane Mvmt Group Istbound Pri. I Sec. Left Thru I Right stbound Pri. I Sec. Left L Thru TR Right Irthbound Pri. Sec. I Left Thru Right ruthbound Pri. Sec. Left I Thru Right L TR L TR L TR 1st I I I I I I I Adj Flow Rate (v) 37 904 31 828 22 344 112 213 CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Adj Sat Flow Green Flow Rate Ratio Ratio (s) (vIs) (g/C) 486 3603 0.08 # 0.25 0.417 0.417 --Lane Group-- Capacity vIe (c) Ratio 202 0.18 1501 0.60 174 0.18 1496 0.55 495 0.04 732 0.47 381 0.29 743 0.29 Time/Cycle, L = 10.00 sec 417 3590 0.07 0.23 0.417 0.417 1187 1757 0.02 # 0.20 0.417 0.417 915 1783 0.12 0.12 0.417 0.417 Sum (vIs) critical = 0.45 Critical v/c(X) = 0.54 I I Jprl LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET Ratios Unf Prog Lane Incremental Res Lane Group Approach L ne Del Adj Grp Factor Del Del Grp vie g/C dl Fact Cap k d2 d3 Delay LOS Delay LOS Istbound L 0.18 0.417 11.1 1.000 202 0.50 2.0 0.0 13.0 8 I 0.60 0.417 13.6 1.000 1501 0.50 1.8 0.0 15.4 8 15.3 8 Westbound I 0.18 0.417 11.0 1.000 174 0.50 2.2 0.0 13.3 8 0.55 0.417 13.3 1.000 1496 0.50 1.5 0.0 14.7 8 14.7 8 Irthbound 0.04 0.417 10.4 1.000 495 0.50 0.2 0.0 10.6 8 0.47 0.417 12.7 1.000 732 0.50 2.2 0.0 14.9 8 14.6 8 I. uthbound 0.29 TR 0.29 I I I I I I I I I I I 0.417 11.6 0.417 11.6 1.000 381 1.000 743 0.50 2.0 0.50 1.0 0.0 0.0 13.6 12.6 8 8 12.9 8 Intersection Delay = 14.7 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = 8 I I I SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET for exclusive lefts IAPPROACH cle Length, C 60.0 sec Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G Ifective Green Time for Lane Group, 9 posing Effective Green Time, go Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N Imber of Opposing Lanes, No justed Left-Turn Flow Rate, Vlt roportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Plto Ijusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo st Time for Lane Group, tl ft Turns per Cycle: LTC=VltC/3600 'POSing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc=VoC/3600fluo posing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) =[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b))]-tl, gf<=g Opposing Queue Ratio: qro=l-Rpo(go/C) 1=(4.943YOIC**0.762)(qro*~1.061)-tl' gq<=g =g-gq If gq>=gf, =g-gf If gq<gf n=(gq-gf)/2, n>=O ~hO=l-Plto *=Plt[1+{(N-l)g/(gf+gu/Ell+4.24)}] 1 (Figure 9-7) 12=(1-ptho**n)/Plto, E12>=1.0 in=2(1+Plt)/g or fmin=2(1+PI)/g iff=max(gq-gf,O) fm=[gf/g]+[gu/g][l/{l+PI(Ell-l)}], (min=fmin;max=1.00) It=fm=[gf/9]+9diff[1/{1+Plt(E12-1)}] gu/g][1/(1+Plt(Ell-l)],(min=fmin;max=1.0) or flt=[fm+0.91(N-l)]/N** fIt 0.256 0.220 0.625 I For special case of single-lane approach opposed by multilane approach, Ie text. If PI>=l for shared left-turn lanes with N>l, then assume de-facto left-turn lane and redo calculations. J For permitted left-turns with multiple exclusive left-turn lanes, flt=fm. r special case of multilane approach opposed by single-lane approach when gf>gq, see text. E8 25.0 25.0 25.0 1 2 37 0.00 828 5.00 0.62 7.26 1.00 0.0 0.58 6.18 18.82 3.09 1.00 1.00 2.94 1.00 0.16 0.00 0.26 I I I I W8 25.0 25.0 25.0 1 2 31 0.00 904 5.00 0.52 7.93 1.00 0.0 0.58 7.58 17.42 3.79 1.00 1.00 3.17 1.00 0.16 0.00 0.22 N8 25.0 25.0 25.0 1 1 22 0.00 213 5.00 0.37 3.55 1.00 0.0 0.58 0.00 25.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.60 1.00 0.16 0.00 0.62 S8 25.0 25.0 25.0 1 1 112 0.00 344 5.00 1.87 5.73 1.00 0.0 0.58 3.27 21.73 1.63 1.00 1.00 1.80 1.00 0.16 0.00 0.48 0.482 I I I SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET for shared lefts IAPPROACH cle Length, C 60.0 sec Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G Ifective Green Time for Lane Group, 9 posing Effective Green Time, go Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N Imber of Opposing Lanes, No justed Left-Turn Flow Rate, Vlt roportion of Left Turns in Lane Group, PIt loportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Plto justed Opposing Flow Rate, Vo st Time for Lane Group, tl _ft Turns per Cycle: LTC=VltC/3600 posing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc=VoC/3600fluo posing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) gf=[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b))]-tl, gf<=g IPosing Queue Ratio: qro=l-Rpo(go/C) =(4.943Volc**0.762)(qro**1.061)-tl, gq<=g gu =g-gq if gq>=gf, =g-gf if gq<gf ~(9q-9f)/2' n>=O ho=l-Plto 1*=Plt[1+{(N-l)g/(gf+gu/Ell+4.24))) 11 (Figure 9-7) 2=(1-Ptho**n)/Plto, EI2>=1.0 in=2(1+Plt)/g or fmin=2(1+PI)/g liff=maX(gq-9f,0) =[gf/g]+[gu/g][l/{l+Pl(Ell-l)}], (min=fmin;max=1.00) t=fm=[gf/g]+gdiff[1/{1+Plt(El2-1)}] +[gu/g][1/(1+Plt(Ell-l)],(min=fmin;max=1.0) or flt=[fm+0.91(N-l)]/N** I fIt Primary Ir special case of single-lane approach opposed by multilane approach, e text. * If Pl>=l for shared left-turn lanes with N>l, then assume de-facto left-turn lane and redo calculations. IL For permitted left-turns with multiple exclusive left-turn lanes, flt=fm. ~r special case of multilane approach opposed by single-lane approach If when gf>gq, see text. I I I E8 W8 N8 S8 I I I SUPPLEMENTAL UNIFORM DELAY WORKSHEET Ij. LT Vol from Vol Adjustment Worksheet, v c ratio from Capacity Worksheet, X Primary phase effective green, 9 Icondary phase effective green, gq rom Supplemental Permitted LT Worksheet), gu Cycle length, C 60.0 Red =CC-g-gq-gu), r (rivals: v/C3600CmaxCX,1.0))), qa imary ph. departures: s/3600, sp Secondary ph. departures: sCgq+gu)/Cgu*3600), ss i~~~ ~ase leue at beginning of green arrow, Qa eue at beginning of unsaturated green, Qu sidual queue, Qr Uniform Delay, dl I Initial Unmet Demand Q veh Ipr/ Lane fUP astbound I Istbound I Northbound I luthbound I I I DELAY/LOS WORKSHEET WITH INITIAL QUEUE Dur. Unmet Demand t hrs. Uniform Delay Unadj. Adj. ds dl sec Intersection Delay 14.7 sec/veh Initial Queue Paramo u Final Unmet Demand Q veh E8LT Initial Queue Delay d3 sec W8LT N8LT S8LT Lane Group Delay d sec Intersection LOS 8 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I " I APPENDIX C PROPOSED ROUTING SCHEDULES I I I' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I " I Route No. Proposed Routing For Fixed Routes At Laura Street Terminal 18 Northbound/Southbound: Greenwood Ave. to and from Laura St. Terminal 52 Northbound: Ft. Harrison Ave. to Pierce St. to Greenwood Ave. to Laura St. Terminal Southbound: Greenwood Ave. to Pierce St. to Ft. Harrison Ave. 60 Westbound/Eastbound: Cleveland St. to Greenwood Ave. to and from Laura St. Terminal 61 Northbound/Southbound: Greenwood Ave. to and from Laura St. Terminal Northbound: Myrtle Ave. to aeveland St. to Greenwood Ave. to ~ ) Laura St. Terminal to Greenwood Ave. to Drew St. to Garden Ave. ( rro.ll \xl.D-{h(\A Jones St. to Ft. Harrison Ave. "-- 66 Southbound: Ft. Harrison Ave. to Drew St. to Greenwood Ave. to Laura St. Terminal to Greenwood Ave. to Cleveland St. to Myrtle Ave. 67 Southbound/Northbound: . Drew St. to Greenwood Ave. to and from Laura St. Terminal 73 Northbound: Myrtle Ave. to Chestnut st. to Greenwood Ave. to . Laura St. Terminal Southbound: Greenwood Ave. to Court St. to Myrtle Ave. 76 Westbound/Eastbound: Cleveland St. to Greenwood Ave. to and from Laura St. Terminal 78 Southbound/Northbound: Myrtle Ave. to Drew St. to Greenwood Ave. to and from Laura St. Terminal 1 I I I I I I I' I I I I I I I I I I I " I Route No. Proposed Routing For Fixed Routes At Laura Street Terminal 80 Westbound: Laura st. Terminal to Greenwood Ave. to Drew st. to Memorial Causeway 80 Eastbound: Memorial Causeway to Pierce st. to Chestnut St. to Greenwood Ave. to Laura St. Terminal ,. or ~l~~ ( C) hew bo.#1 ~~ 82 Southbound/Northbound: Myrtle Ave. to Drew St. to Greenwood Ave. to and from Laura St. Terminal 92 Southbound/Northbound: Greenwood Ave. to and from Laura St. Terminal 98 Northbound: Ft. Harrison Ave. to Park Street to Greenwood Ave. to Laura St. Terminal Southbound: Greenwood Ave. to Pierce st. to Ft. Harrison Ave. 2 I, I' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Weekday Total Trips Serving Proposed Terminal Site At Laura Street Route Trips Per No. Day 18 30 52 30 60 29. 61 28 66 27 67 13 73 12 76 13 78 13 80 31 82 7 92 6 98 6 Total Trips Per Da : 245 I. I II II II II II II II II II II I I I I I I ~ I H ourly Trips Serving Proposed Terminal Site ~ ~ . At Laura Street Route Trips Per No. Hour 18 2 52 2 60 2 61 2 66 2 67 1 73 1 76 1 78 1 80 2 82 1 92 1 98 2 0 Total Trips Per Hour: 20 II II I I II II II II I' II II It I I I I I I " l! APPENDIX D FUTURE IDGHWAY CAPACITY ANALYSIS II II I II II II II II II II II I! I I I I I I I Turning Movement Volume Spreadsheet for PSTA Transit Terminal PM Cleveland St. @ Greenwood Ave. N. Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound L T R L T R L T R L T R 2000 19 239 57 96 165 18 32 767 10 27 685 27 3% Growth 20 246 59 99 170 19 33 790 10 28 706 28 Project Traffic 7 591 3 7 2~1 3 101 4 Total Traffic 20 253 102 177 36 790 28 706 32 PM Drew St. @ Greenwood Ave. N. Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound L T R L T R L T R L T R 2000 25 226 59 35 152 12 14 763 21 25 465 58 3% Growth 26 233 61 36 157 12 14 786 22 26 479 60 Project Traffic 3 2 6~1 2 121 1 221 3 Total Traffic 29 235 36 159 15 786 26 479 63 II II HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.1c City/St: proj #: Period: N/S St: Iter: Drew St. & Greenwood Ave.. alyst: King Background Plus Project te: 6/7/00 E/W St: Drew Street I IJo. Clearwater 1520.001.000 PM Peak Greenwood Avenue Eastbound L T R SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Westbound Northbound L T R L T R Southbound L T R Lanes LGConfig Itl ume ne Width RTOR Vol I~ration o 2 LTR 786 12.0 o o 2 LTR 479 12.0 o 15 22 26 63 o o 29 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations 3 4 0.25 fhase Combination 1 Left P Thru P Right P Peds X Left P Thru P Right P Peds X Right It Right een llow All Red Ircle Length: A9pr/ Lane iI~ne Group Irp Capacity Eastbound IrR 2 Ib Il 25.0 4.0 1.0 60.0 secs Intersection Performance Adj Sat Ratios Flow Rate (s) v/c g/C 0.69 1326 3183 0.417 o 1 LTR 235 12.0 o 1 LTR 159 12.0 12 25.0 4.0 1.0 Summary Lane Group o o 62 36 o o NB 7 8 5 P P P X P P P X 6 SB Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds Right Right Approach Delay LOS Delay LOS B 17.3 B EB WB 17.3 I:stbound LTR 1238 2971 0.51 0.417 14.5 B 14.5 B I)rthbound LTR 620 1487 0.58 0.417 17.5 B 17.5 B Imthbound r~R 592 1421 0.39 0.417 14.1 B 14.1 B Intersection Delay = 16.1 ( sec/veh) Intersection LOS B = I I I HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.1c lstems Administrator .'ng Engineering Associates, Inc. I Phone: r Mai I : Intersection: lty/State: alyst: Project No: ~me Period Analyzed: IJ3.te: East/West Street Name: Irrth/south Street Name: Fax: OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Drew St. & Greenwood Ave.. Clearwater King Background Plus Project 1520.001.000 PM Peak 6/7/00 Drew Street Greenwood Avenue VOLUME DATA I Ilume HF k 15 Vol Ii Ln Vol Grade jeal Sat ParkExist l.lmpark Heavy Veh No. Lanes 13COnfig :me Width fOR Vol Adj Flow IrnSharedLn .rop Turns NumPeds lImBUS Duration I I I I Eastbound L T R Westbound L T R Northbound L T R Southbound L T R 15 786 22 26 479 63 29 235 62 36 159 12 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 4 218 6 7 133 18 8 65 17 10 44 3 0 0 0 0 1900 1900 1900 1900 0 5 0 0 5 0 5 5 5 0 5 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 LTR LTR LTR LTR 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 0 0 0 0 914 631 362 230 0.02 0.03 0.05 0.11 0.09 0.19 0.17 0.06 10 10 10 10 5 5 5 5 0.25 Area Type: All other areas I I I Eastbound L T R lit Unmet 0.0 riv. Type 3 it Ext. 3.0 I Factor 1. 000 1st Time 2.0 t of g 2.0 Ped Min g 4.3 I rse Combination 1 2 . Left P Thru P I Right P Peds X r Left P Thru P Right P Peds X I Right 13 Right OPERATING PARAMETERS Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R 0.0 0.0 0.0 3 3 3 3.0 3.0 3.0 1. 000 1.000 1.000 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 4.3 4.3 4.3 PHASE DATA 3 4 I 5 6 7 8 NB Left P Thru P Right P Peds X SB Left P Thru P Right P Peds X EB Right WB Right 25.0 4.0 1.0 Ireen :=llow 11 Red 25.0 4.0 1.0 Irc1e Length: 60.0 secs I I I I I I II I VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Ipr./ Adjusted Prop. Prop. Mvt Flow No. Lane Flow Rate Left Right Movement Volume PHF Rate Lanes Group RTOR In Lane Grp Turns Turns I.stbound 15 0.90 17 0 Left Thru 786 0.90 873 2 LTR 914 0.02 0.03 I Right 22 0.90 24 0 0 Westbound I Left 26 0.90 29 0 Thru 479 0.90 532 2 LTR 631 0.05 0.11 Right 63 0.90 70 0 0 trthbound 29 0.90 32 0 Left Thru 235 0.90 261 1 LTR 362 0.09 0.19 I Right 62 0.90 69 0 0 Southbound I Left 36 0.90 40 0 Thru 159 0.90 177 1 LTR 230 0.17 0.06 Right 12 0.90 13 0 0 Ivalue entered by user. SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET lpr/ Ideal Adj Lane Sat f f f f f f f f f Sat roup Flow W HV G P BB A LU RT LT Flow astbound See LT Adj/LT Sat: tR 1900 1.000 0.952 1.000 1.000 0.990 1. 00 0.95 0.996 0.939 3183 rstbound See LT Adj/LT Sat: LTR 1900 1.000 0.952 1. 000 1. 000 0.990 1. 00 0.95 0.983 0.888 2971 lrthbound See LT Adj/LT Sat: rR 1900 1.000 0.952 1.000 1.000 0.980 1. 00 1. 00 0.873 0.960 1487 [uthbound See LT Adj/LT Sat: R 1900 1. 000 0.952 1.000 1.000 0.980 1. 00 1. 00 0.892 0.898 1421 I I I I I Appr / Mvrnt Lane Group Adj Flow Rate (v) CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Adj Sat Flow Green Flow Rate Ratio Ratio (s) (v/s) (g/C) --Lane Group-- Capacity v/c (c) Ratio rstb<;mnd Prl. Sec. Left I Thru Right Westbound I Pri. Sec. Left I Thru LTR Right r orthbound Pri. I Sec. Left Thru LTR . Right ~uthbound Pri. Sec. Left Thru Right LTR I I Lost I I I I I I I I LTR 914 631 362 230 3183 # 0.29 0.417 1326 0.69 2971 0.21 0.417 1238 0.51 1487 # 0.24 0.417 620 0.58 1421 0.16 0.417 592 0.39 Time/Cycle, L = 10.00 sec Sum (v/s) critical = 0.53 Critical v/c(X) = 0.64 I I LEVEL OF prog Lane Adj Grp Fact Cap Appr/ I~e Ratios Unf Del d1 v/c g/C SERVICE WORKSHEET Incremental Res Factor Del Del k d2 d3 Lane Group Delay LOS Approach Delay LOS Istbound R 0.69 Istbound LTR 0.51 Irthbound IR 0.58 uthbound fR I I I I I I I I I I I 0.417 14.3 0.417 13.0 0.417 13.5 1.000 1326 1. 000 1238 1. 000 620 0.39 0.417 12.2 1.000 592 0.50 2.9 0.50 1.5 0.50 4.0 0.50 1.9 Intersection Delay = 16.1 ( sec/veh) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 17.3 B 14.5 B 17.5 B 14.1 B Intersection LOS 17.3 B 14.5 B 17.5 B 14.1 B B I I I APPROACH ICle Length, C 60.0 sec tual Green Time for Lane Group, G fective Green Time for Lane Group, 9 IPosing Effective Green Time, go . mber of Lanes in Lane Group, N mber of Opposing Lanes, No Adjusted Left-Turn Flow Rate, Vlt loportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Plto justed Opposing Flow Rate, Vo Lost Time for Lane Group, tl 1ft Turns per Cycle: LTC=VltC/3600 posing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc=VoC/3600fluo posing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) 1=[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b))]-tl, gf<=g posing Queue Ratio: qro=l-Rpo(go/C) =(4.943Volc**0.762) (qro**1.061) -tl, gq<=g gu =g-gq if gq>=gf, =g-gf if gq<gf 1(9q-9f)/2, n>=O ho=l-Plto *=Plt[l+{ (N-1)g/(gf+gu/El1+4.24)}] 11 (Figure 9-7) 2=(1-Ptho**n)/Plto, E12>=1.0 in=2(1+Plt)/g or fmin=2(1+Pl)/g gdiff=max(gq-gf,O) 1= [gf/g]+ [gu/g] [1/{1+Pl(El1-1)}], (min=fminimax=l.OO) t=fm=[gf/g]+gdiff[1/{1+Plt(E12-1) }] + [gu/g] [1/(1+Plt(El1-1)], (min=fminimax=l.O) or flt=[fm+0.91(N-1)]/N** flt SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET for exclusive lefts EB WB NB SB I For special case of single-lane approach opposed by multilane approach, te text. If Pl>=~ for shared left-turn lanes with N>~, then assume de-facto left-turn lane and redo calculations. If For permitted left-turns with multiple exclusive left-turn lanes, flt=fm. IPr special case of multilane approach opposed by single-lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. I I I I I I I I SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET for shared lefts APPROACH ICle Length, C 60.0 sec tual Green Time for Lane Group, G ffective Green Time for Lane Group, 9 IPosing Effective Green Time, go mber of Lanes in Lane Group, N mber of Opposing Lanes, No Adjusted Left-Turn Flow Rate, Vlt (Oportion of Left Turns in Lane Group, Plt oportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Plto Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo 1st Time for Lane Group, tl ft Turns per Cycle: LTC=VltC/3600 posing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc=VoC/3600fluo IPosing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) =[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b))] -tl, gf<=g posing Queue Ratio: qro=l-Rpo(go/C) gq= (4. 943Volc**0. 762) (qro**l. 061) -tl, gq<=g I =g-gq if gq>=gf, =g-gf if gq<gf (gq-gf)/2, n>=O tho=l-Plto 1*=Plt[l+{ (N-1)g/(gf+gu/El1+4.24))) 1 (Figure 9-7) 2=(1-Ptho**n)/Plto, E12>=1.0 fmin=2(1+Plt)/g or fmin=2(1+Pl)/g ~iff=max(gq-gf,O) .= [gf/g] + [gu/g] [1/ {l+Pl (El1-1) }], (min=fminjmax=l. 00) flt=fm=[gf/g]+gdiff[1/{1+Plt(E12-1) }] I[gu/g] [1/ (l+Pl t (El1-1) ] , (min=fminj max=l . 0) or fl t= [fm+O . 91 (N -1) ] /N* * flt Primary 0.939 0.888 0.960 EB 25.0 25.0 25.0 2 2 17 0.02 0.05 631 5.00 0.28 5.54 1. 00 12.5 0.58 2.92 12.51 0.00 0.95 0.04 2.70 1. 00 0.08 0.00 0.97 WB 25.0 25.0 25.0 2 2 29 0.05 0.02 914 5.00 0.48 8.02 1. 00 9.8 0.58 7.77 15.19 0.00 0.98 0.11 3.60 1. 00 0.09 0.00 0.87 NB 25.0 25.0 25.0 1 1 32 0.09 0.17 230 5.00 0.53 3.83 1. 00 9.0 0.58 2.77 15.99 0.00 0.83 0.09 1. 75 1. 00 0.09 0.00 0.96 SB 25.0 25.0 25.0 1 1 40 0.17 0.09 362 5.00 0.67 6.03 1. 00 7.8 0.58 5.98 17.16 0.00 0.91 0.17 2.00 1. 00 0.09 0.00 0.90 0.898 tr special case of single-lane approach opposed by multilane approach, e text. * If Pl>=l for shared left-turn lanes with N>l, then assume de-facto . left-turn lane and redo calculations. It For permitted left-turns with multiple exclusive left-turn lanes, flt=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single-lane approach IF when gf>gq, see text. I I I I I I I Adj. LT Vol from Vol Adjustment Worksheet, v Ic ratio from Capacity Worksheet, X imary phase effective green, g econdary phase effective green, gq jrom Supplemental Permitted LT Worksheet), gu cle length, C 60.0 Red = (C-g-gq-gu) , r rivals: v/(3600(max(X,1.0))), qa Primary ph. departures: s/3600, sp Icondary ph. departures: s(gq+gu)/(gu*3600), ss erm XProt If:~: at beginning of green arrow, Qa ~eue at beginning of unsaturated green, Qu Residual queue, Qr ~iform Delay, d1 DELAY/LOS WORKSHEET WITH INITIAL QUEUE SUPPLEMENTAL UNIFORM DELAY WORKSHEET EBLT WBLT NBLT SBLT I Initial Appr/ Unmet rne Demand w-oup Q veh Eastbound I Dur. Unmet Demand t hrs. Uniform Delay Unadj. ds Adj. d1 sec Initial Queue Paramo u Final Unmet Demand Q veh Initial Queue Delay d3 sec Lane Group Delay d sec Istbound I Northbound I Juthbound I I I I Intersection Delay 16.1 sec/veh Intersection LOS B I I -, HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.1c Inter: Cleveland St. & Greenwood Ave. lalyst: King Background Plus Project te: 5/24/00 E/W St: Cleveland Street City/St: Clearwater proj #: 1520.001.000 period: PM Peak N/S St: Greenwood Avenue I. Lanes LGConfig Ilume ne Width RTOR Vol Iration Eastbound L T R SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Westbound Northbound L T R L T R 120 L TR 36 790 10 12.0 12.0 o 0.25 Phase Combination 1 t Left P Thru P Right P I Peds X Left P Thru P I Right P Peds X Right SB Right !teen .llow All Red cle Length: 2 25.0 4.0 1.0 60.0 1 2 0 L TR 28 706 32 12.0 12.0 o Southbound L T R 110 L TR 20 253 59 12.0 12.0 1 L 102 12.0 o o 1 TR 177 12.0 23 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations 3 4 o NB 8 SB Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds Right Right EB WB pr/ Lane tp Lane Group Capacity secs Intersection Performance Adj Sat Ratios Flow Rate (s) Summary Lane Group Approach v/c g/C 5 P P P X P P P X 6 7 25.0 4.0 1.0 Delay LOS Eastbound . 206 ~ 1424 494 3418 [stbound 180 1417 431 3401 trthbound 490 1176 TR 726 1742 ---uthbound !-' 361 866 f 735 1763 Intersection Delay I 0.19 0.62 0.417 0.417 0.17 0.58 0.417 0.417 0.04 0.48 0.417 0.417 0.31 0.30 0.417 0.417 = 15.0 ( sec/veh) 13.2 15.9 13.1 15.2 10.6 15.0 14.0 12.7 Delay LOS B B 15.8 B B 15.1 B B 14.7 B B 13.2 Intersection LOS B B B B B I I HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.1c (stems Administrator 'ng Engineering Associates, Inc. lone: E-Mail: I Fax: OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Intersection: I' ty/State: alyst: roject No: tme Period Analyzed: te: st/West Street Name: North/South Street Name: I I Cleveland St. & Greenwood Ave. Clearwater King Background Plus Project 1520.001.000 PM Peak 5/24/00 Cleveland Street Greenwood Avenue VOLUME DATA Volume 36 790 10 28 706 32 20 253 59 102 177 23 tF15 Vol 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 10 219 3 8 196 9 6 70 16 28 49 6 Hi Ln Vol J.Grade 0 0 0 0 eal Sat 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 ParkExist [mpark Heavy Veh 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 5 5 5 . Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 LGConfig L TR L TR L TR L TR Ine Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 OR Vol 0 0 0 0 Adj Flow 40 889 31 820 22 347 113 223 InSharedLn op Turns 0.01 0.04 0.19 0.12 umpeds 10 10 10 10 ImBUE 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0.25 Area Type: All other areas ration I I I I Eastbound L T R Westbound L T R Northbound L T R Southbound L T R I I OPERATING PARAMETERS I Eastbound Westbound Northbound L T R L T R L T R lit Unmet 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 riv. Type 3 3 3 3 3 3 nit Ext. 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 iFact,?r 1.000 1.000 1.000 st Tlme 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 t of g 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 ped Min g 3.0 3.0 3.0 I PHASE DATA ree Combination 1 2 3 4 I 5 6 Left P NB Left P Thru P Thru P I Right P Right P Peds X Peds X r Left P SB Left P Thru P Thru P Right P Right P I Peds X Peds X Right EB Right r Right WB Right leen 25.0 25.0 llow 4.0 4.0 1 Red 1.0 1.0 Southbound L T R 0.0 0.0 3 3 3.0 3.0 1. 000 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 Irele Length: 60.0 sees I I I I I I 7 8 I I I I VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET 'pr./ Adjusted Prop. Prop. Mvt Flow No. Lane Flow Rate Left Right Movement Volume PHF Rate Lanes Group RTOR In Lane Grp Turns Turns Istbound 36 0.90 40 Left 1 L 40 I Thru 790 0.90 878 2 TR 889 0.01 Right 10 0.90 11 0 0 Westbound I Left 28 0.90 31 1 L 31 Thru 706 0.90 784 2 TR 820 0.04 Right 32 0.90 36 0 0 Irthbound 20 0.90 22 1 L 22 Left Thru 253 0.90 281 1 TR 347 0.19 I Right 59 0.90 66 0 0 Southbound I Left 102 0.90 113 1 L 113 Thru 177 0.90 197 1 TR 223 0.12 Right 23 0.90 26 0 0 I Value entered by user. SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Ipr/ Ideal Adj Lane Sat f f f f f f f f f Sat (OUP Flow W HV G P BB A LU RT LT Flow astbound See LT Adj/LT Sat: t 1900 1. 000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1. 000 1. 00 1. 00 0.260 494 1900 1. 000 0.952 1. 000 1.000 0.996 1. 00 0.95 0.998 1. 000 3418 Istbound See LT Adj/LT Sat: 1900 1. 000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1. 000 1. 00 1. 00 0.227 431 TR 1900 1.000 0.952 1. 000 1. 000 0.996 1. 00 0.95 0.993 1.000 3401 lrthbound See LT Adj/LT Sat: L 1900 1.000 1. 000 1. 000 1.000 1. 000 1. 00 1. 00 0.619 1176 t 1900 1.000 0.952 1.000 1.000 0.992 1. 00 1.00 0.971 1. 000 1742 ruthbound See LT Adj/LT Sat: 1900 1.000 0.952 1.000 1.000 1. 000 1. 00 1. 00 0.478 866 TR 1900 1.000 0.952 1. 000 1. 000 0.992 1. 00 1. 00 0.982 1.000 1763 I I I I I Appr / Mvmt Lane Group Adj Flow Rate (v) CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Adj Sat Flow Green Flow Rate Ratio Ratio (s) (v/s) (g/C) --Lane Group-- Capacity v/c (c) Ratio rstbound Pri. Sec. Left I Thru Right Westbound I Pri. Sec. Left L I Thru TR Right orthbound I Pri. Sec. Left L Thru TR . Right "uthbound Pri. Sec. Left Thru Right L TR I I Lost I I I I I I I I L TR 40 889 31 820 22 347 113 223 494 0.08 3418 # 0.26 0.417 0.417 206 1424 180 1417 490 726 361 735 0.19 0.62 0.17 0.58 0.04 0.48 0.31 0.30 Time/Cycle, L 10.00 sec 431 0.07 3401 0.24 0.417 0.417 1176 0.02 1742 # 0.20 0.417 0.417 866 0.13 1763 0.13 0.417 0.417 Sum (v/s) critical Critical v/c(X) 0.46 0.55 I I Ratios LEVEL OF prog Lane Adj Grp Fact Cap Appr/ I~e Unf Del d1 v/c g/C Istbound 0.19 0.62 SERVICE WORKSHEET Incremental Res Factor Del Del k d2 d3 Lane Group Delay LOS Approach Delay LOS 0.417 11.1 0.417 13.8 1. 000 206 1. 000 1424 tstbound 0.17 TR 0.58 Irthbound L 0.04 I 0.48 uthbound L 0.31 t 0.30 I I I I I I I I I I I 0.50 0.50 2.1 2.1 0.0 0.0 13.2 15.9 B B 0.417 11. 0 1. 000 180 0.50 2.1 0.0 13.1 B 0.417 13.5 1. 000 1417 0.50 1.7 0.0 15.2 B 0.417 10.4 1. 000 490 0.50 0.2 0.0 10.6 B 0.417 12.7 1.000 726 0.50 2.2 0.0 15.0 B 0.417 11. 7 1. 000 361 0.50 2.3 0.0 14.0 B 0.417 11. 7 1.000 735 0.50 1.1 0.0 12.7 B 15.8 B 15.1 B 14.7 B 13.2 B Intersection Delay 15.0 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B I I I SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET for exclusive lefts APPROACH ICle Length, C 60.0 sec tual Green Time for Lane Group, G ffective Green Time for Lane Group, g IPosing Effective Green Time, go mber of Lanes in Lane Group, N mber of Opposing Lanes, No Adjusted Left-Turn Flow Rate, Vlt Itoportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Plto ~justed Opposing Flow Rate, Vo Lost Time for Lane Group, tl 1ft Turns per Cycle: LTC=VltC/3600 posing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc=VoC/3600fluo pposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) 1=[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b))]-tl, gf<=g posing Queue Ratio: qro=l-Rpo(go/C) =(4.943Volc**0.762) (qro**1.061)-tl, gq<=g gu =g-gq if gq>=gf, =g-gf if gq<gf ~(gq-gf)/2, n>=O a:ho=l-Plto Pl*=Plt[l+{ (N-1)g/(gf+gu/El1+4.24)}] 11 (Figure 9-7) 2=(1-Ptho**n)/Plto, E12>=1.0 in=2(1+Plt)/g or fmin=2(1+Pl)/g Eiff=maX(gq-gf,O) = [gf/g] + [gu/g] [1/ {l+Pl (El1-1) }], (min=fminjmax=l. 00) t=fm=[gf/g]+gdiff[1/{1+Plt(E12-1) }] + [gu/g] [1/ (l+Plt (El1-1) ] , (min=fmin j max=l. 0) or fl t= [fm+O . 91 (N -1) ] /N** I flt 0.260 0.227 0.619 EB 25.0 25.0 25.0 1 2 40 0.00 820 5.00 0.67 7.19 1. 00 0.0 0.58 6.04 18.96 3.02 1. 00 1. 00 2.92 1. 00 0.16 0.00 0.26 WB 25.0 25.0 25.0 1 2 31 0.00 889 5.00 0.52 7.80 1. 00 0.0 0.58 7.29 17.71 3.65 1. 00 1. 00 3.13 1. 00 0.16 0.00 0.23 NB 25.0 25.0 25.0 1 1 22 0.00 223 5.00 0.37 3.72 1. 00 0.0 0.58 0.00 25.00 0.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 62 1. 00 0.16 0.00 0.62 SB 25.0 25.0 25.0 1 1 113 0.00 347 5.00 1. 88 5.78 1. 00 0.0 0.58 3.36 21. 64 1. 68 1. 00 1. 00 1. 81 1. 00 0.16 0.00 0.48 0.478 Fr special case of single-lane approach opposed by multilane approach, e text. If Pl>=l for shared left-turn lanes with N>l, then assume de-facto left-turn lane and redo calculations. Ir For permitted left-turns with multiple exclusive left-turn lanes, flt=fm. IPr special case of multilane approach opposed by single-lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. I I I I I I I I APPROACH ICle Length, C 60.0 sec tual Green Time for Lane Group, G ffective Green Time for Lane Group, g IPosing Effective Green Time, go mber of Lanes in Lane Group, N mber of Opposing Lanes, No Adjusted Left-Turn Flow Rate, Vlt ~oportion of Left Turns in Lane Group, PIt ~oportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, PI to Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo 1st Time for Lane Group, tl ft Turns per Cycle: LTC=VltC/3600 posing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc=VoC/3600fluo IPosing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) =[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b))]-tl, gf<=g posing Queue Ratio: qro=l-Rpo(go/C) gq= (4. 943Volc**0. 762) (qro**l. 061) -tl, gq<=g IP =g-gq if gq>=gf, =g-gf if gq<gf It=(gq-gf)/2, n>=O Ptho=l-Plto 1*=Plt[l+{ (N-1)g/(gf+gu/El1+4.24))) 1 (Figure 9-7) w 2=(1-Ptho**n)/Plto, EI2>=1.0 fmin=2(1+Plt)/g or fmin=2(1+PI)/g ~iff=max(gq-gf,O) 1In= [gf/g] + [gu/g] [1/ {l+PI (El1-1) }], (min=fmin i max=1. 00) flt=fm=[gf/g]+gdiff[1/{1+Plt(EI2-1) }] I[gu/g] [1/(1+Plt(El1-1)], (min=fminimax=1.0) or flt=[fm+0.91(N-1)]/N** fIt Primary SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET for shared lefts EB WB NB SB tr special case of single-lane approach opposed by multilane approach, e text. * If PI>=l for shared left-turn lanes with N>l, then assume de-facto . left-turn lane and redo calculations. ~ For permitted left-turns with multiple exclusive left-turn lanes, flt=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single-lane approach IF when gf>gq, see text. I I I I I I I Adj. LT Vol from Vol Adjustment Worksheet, v Ic ratio from Capacity Worksheet, X imary phase effective green, g econdary phase effective green, gq from Supplemental Permitted LT Worksheet), gu cle length, C 60.0 Red = (C-g-gq-gu) , r rivals: v/(3600(max(X,l.0))), qa Primary ph. departures: s/3600, sp Icondary ph. departures: s(gq+gu)/(gu*3600), ss erm XProt I:~: at beginning of green arrow, Qa ueue at beginning of unsaturated green, Qu Residual queue, Qr Itiform Delay, d1 SUPPLEMENTAL UNIFORM DELAY WORKSHEET DELAY/LOS WORKSHEET WITH INITIAL QUEUE I Initial Appr/ Unmet ifne Demand .-oup Q veh Eastbound I Uniform Delay Initial Queue Paramo u Dur. Unmet Demand t hrs. Unadj. ds Adj. d1 sec Istbound I Northbound I Juthbound I I I I Intersection Delay 15.0 sec/veh Intersection LOS B Final Unmet Demand Q veh EBLT WBLT NBLT SBLT Initial Queue Delay d3 sec Lane Group Delay d sec ~ How TO RIDE You can enjoy smooth travel throughout Pinellas County by follO\ving these simple steps, \\'ithin minutes, you'll be on the road to independence. Begin by using this system map to locate the route number closest to your starting point. Next, find the route number located i:;lqsest to your destination. If the two ro umbers are the same, desired location. If the route numbers are not the same, you will need to change buses to complete your trip, PSTA offers individual route maps and schedules of departure times from major intersections. By selecting your route(s) and finding the hour and timepoints closest to your departure and arrival locations, you can eSllmate 70ur travel time, Be sure to check the correct time for the day of tranl as schedules differ throughout the day and on \veekends and holidays. Schedules are a\'ailable at PSTA Customer Service Centers, numerous outlets throughout the county, or call the PSTA InfoUne at (72 7) 530-9911 to request schedules by mail. NEED HELP OR HAVE A Find all the transportation help and information you need by calling the PSTA InfoUne or visiting a PSTA Customer Service Center. Customer Service Representatives are on-hand during the days and hours listed below to help you plan your trip and answer your questions aJout riding the bus. At your request, they can provide you with schedules and brochures about various PSTA services and programs. lAY E PSTA bus stop signs are posted conveniently throughout our service area, many with waiting shelters or benches. Bus operators will only stop for you if you arestanding at a PSTA bus stop sign. When aches, check To help make your ride more enjoyable, please check your GO Card at the time of purchase since cards are non-redeemable, non-refundable, and non-transferable. PSTA and its agents assume no responsibility for lost, stolen, or mutilated cards. Fares Riding with PSTA has always been a terrific value. But the value is even greater with a GO Card. Take any bus, ride any route, transfer whenever you want - its all yours with the GO Card. The cards can be purchased on any day and give you unlimited rides for a week, or a month, starting on the first day you use the card, You'll save on endless rides with the at PSTA Customer Service Centers and at the to will tell you t ute number and destination of the bus. Once you have determined this is the bus you want, motion so the bus operator will be sure to see you, WILLIAMS PARK CUSTOMER SERVICE CENTER PSTA INFOLINE PARK STREET CUSTOMER Reach the telephon,~ information SERVICE CENTER subject to change without notice. PSTA GO Cards and Board the bus through the front door \vith your exact fare or GO Card ready. Operators do not carry cash or make change. Please be sure strollers and carts are folded before boarding, All buses are equipped with \vheelchair lifts and have kneeling devices to make boarding easier for special needs passengers, The seats located closest to the front of the bus are reserved for Photo ID Cards are available and authorized outlets throughout Pinellas County. Or, you can purchase a Daily GO Card right on the bus. Please request your GO Card before inserting money into the farebox. For more information call the PSTA InfoUne Daily, 7 -day, or 31-day Unlimited Ride GO Card. Commuters traveling between St. Petersburg and Tampa can save 10% on every ride with the 20-Ride Premium GO Card. Medicare Located in downto\vn center by calling Located in downte."'" Clc0nNater (727) 530-9911 (Voice/TTY) at the corner of Monday through Friday Park Street and Garden Avenue 6:00 a.m. - 800 p.m. tvlonday through Saturday Saturday 7:00 a.m - 8:00 p,m. 7:15 a.m. - 515 p.m Sunday &: Holidays Sunday &: Holidays St. Petersburg at the corner of 2nd Avenue and 3rd Street North cardholders, students, senior citizens, and persons with disabilities may ride for a reduced cash fare or use a reduced fare GO Card with PSTA Photo ID. Monday through Saturday 7:00 a.m. - 5:45 p.m. Sunday &: Holidays 8:00 a.m. - 400 p.lTI at (727) 530-9911 (Voice/TTY), seniors and disabled persons. 800 a.m. - 4:00 pm. 8:00 a.m. - 430 pm. BIKES ON \Vhen approaching your destination, signal the bus operator by pulling down the cord or pushing . - -the'strip Iocatecfll-earthe \vlndow. A bell will alert the bus operator to stop at the next PSTA bus stop sign, Wait until the bus comes to a complete stop before exiting. Please exit through the rear door whenenr possible and never cross the street in front of the bus. GO CARD FARE STRUCTURE REDUCED FARE 10 REQUIREMENTS (Closed 1130 am, - 1230 pm _w__"_,___ St,ndu-}s &: HuhdJ.Ys onLY) Daily Unlimited Ride GO Card Regular Fare: $2.50 Reduced Fare: $125 7-Day Unlimited Ride GO Card Regular Fare S12.00 31-Day Unlimited Ride GO Card Regular Fare: $40.00 Reduced Fare: $25.00 20-Ride Premium GO Card ID must be presented before using a reduced fare GO Card or paying a reduced cash fare. Original Medicare Card PSTA Senior Special Citizen Photo ID Card To obtain, present proof of age (65+) PSTA Disabled Special Citizen Photo ID Card Call 530-9921 to apply. PSTA Student Photo ID Card Regular Fare: $2700 To apply, present proof of current enrollment in a Pinellas County school. Ever take the bus to your destination and wish you had your bicycle with you? Allow us to introduce you to PSTA's Bikes on Buses Program. It brings you the convenience of bringing your bike anywhere PSTA travels. Or lets you explore areas you could never get to by bike alone. Easily Conveniently Safely Plus, the PSTA Bikes on Buses permit is valid on HARTline buses, so you can continue your travel into Hillsborough County ;Closed 1245 pm. - 145 pm daily) Whether you use a bike for transportation or recreation, or to commute to work, the Bikes on Buses Program may be just the ticket. All it takes is a few minutes with a "how-to" video, some simple bike-loading instruction and a $2 Bikes on Buses permit. (A permit, by the way, that never expires), Just stop by one of the permit outlets conveniently located around Pinellas County. To find the outlet nearest you, call the PSTA InfoLine at (727) 530-9911 (Voice/TTY). WEVE GOT YOUR NUMBER PSTA InfoLine Scheduling &. Routing Information (727) 530-9911 (Voice/TTY) PSTA Lost and Found, Clearwater Dhision (727) 530-9921- Call 8:00 a.m. - 4:30 p.m. PSTA Lost and Found, S1. Petersburg Division (727) 323-7415 - Call 8:00 a.m. - 4:30 p.m. Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority (PSTA) Administrative Headquarters 14840 49th Street North Clearwater, FL 33762 (727) 530-9921 Business Hours: 8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. M-F Pinellas County Transportation Disadvantaged Program (727) 545-2100 S1. Petersburg Downtown Transportation Management Initiative (SPDTMO) (727) 821-5166 order (no cash please) for the exact price of the ticket you need to PSTA Headquarters at 14840 49th Street North, Clearwater 33762, Ann: Tickets by Mail. Please include a self- addressed, stamped envelope and a short note indicating your ticket choice. Disabled - Ride for 50% off the cash fare or use the reduced fare GO Cards. Call for details on how to qualify. Seniors - Enjoy 50% off cash fares or use the special reduced fare GO Cards. Just present proof of age as 65 or older to obtain a PSTA Senior Special Citizen lD card. THAT MAKE THE GOING EASIER Bay Area Commuter Service (BACS) 1-800-998- RID E PSTA offers a great deal more than a ride on the bus. A host of PSTA programs ensure that everyone has affordable, reliable transportation. But PSTA also goes the extra mile, providing an abundant offering of special service, creating a better community for us all. Corporate Programs - Here you'll find answers to special corporate needs and employee transporta- tion problems. Try us... we'll get the job done, Hillsborough Area Regional Transit (HARTline) (813) 254-4278 InfoLine - All the transportation help and informa- tion you need is at your fingertips, up to 14 hours a day, seven days a week including holidays. Just call 530-9911 (Voice/TTY). Medicare Cardholders - Simply present your original Medicare Card upon boarding to get 50% off the cash fare, or to use a reduced fare GO Card. S1. Pete Beach City Transit (BATS) (727) 367-3086 Treasure Island Municipal Transit (727) 547-4575 Demand Response Service - For just 52 a trip, disabled persons unable to use regular bus service may be eligible for special transportation. Call 530-9921 for information about how to apply Pasco County Public Transit (PCPT) (727) 834-3322 Trip Planning Service - PSTA plans your excursion, giving you the route maps, schedules and information you need, Children - Up to three children, five years and younger, ride free when accompanied by a fare-paying adult. Bikes on Buses - The newest way to ride 'n roll- just steer your bike on over to any PSTA bus stop and hop on board. Riders must have training and permits in order participate in this program, Schedules By Mail- Passengers can receive up to three route schedules by mail free of charge. To request specific schedules call the PSTA InfoLine at (727) 530-9911 (Voice/TTY). Students - Get 50% off cash fares or use the special reduced fare GO Cards. Teachers, classes, and summer camps can ride the bus to field trips and special library functions. \Ve'll even help plan your trip. Call for details. have any comments, suggestions, or compHmentsic" bout <\: specific. bus or driver, be sure to give us the of travel, time, and bus number. t (127) 530~9911 (VoiceffTY). Tickets By Mail - Order PSTA GO Cards from the comfort of home. Simply mail a check or money Speakers Bureau - Need to know the role of public transportation in our community? Or what PSTA is doing to help the environment? Call us for an engaging speaker who will give you all the facts. "Show Me" Service - First-time riders can get schedules, route maps, fare information, and more brought right to their door. A PSTA representative will even take the first bus-trip with you, Volunteer Program - Like riding public transit? Have some free time on your hands? Why not become a volunteer for PSTA and help us spread the good word. Make new friends while making a con- tribution to the community. Training provided PSTA a Great Place to Work - In addition to transportation, PSTA provides employment opportunities. We have career positions for professional Bus Drivers, Mechanics, Fueler Cleaners, Customer Service Representatives and others. Call our Human Resources Department today to get on the road to a new career. PSTA is an Equal Opportunity Employer. nrary;r";".:c,c;;,,c,, 74th Street Elementary Sl:hooL... ~on Elementary Sl:hooL . Sheraton Sand Key Resort.... Shopping Center ... , Shorecrest Sch.oo! .. Skycrest Elementary Sl:hooL Skyway SllOpping Center, Social Security/Social Benefits Office.. . Social Senices Office . Soum Ward ElementarY Sl:hool. Southern Oak ElennenWy School Southside Fundamental Middle SchooL ... . Spa Beach Par[e.." Stansel Park Starkey Elementary School.. State Office Building, Stetson ColIege., Suncoast Hospital.. Sunken Gardens.. ." Sunset Point 19 Shopping Center.. Sunshine Senior Center.. Tarpon MalL Tarpon Springs City Hall ." Tarpon Springs Fundamental Elementary Sl:hoo! ... .Fl Tarpon Springs KMarI",~;~;,:'".:;'t'!""",,J"",.';\;""t;;llt";;'.'.F ".,;....."GI6 ."G~,JH, Jl; ....Ll(} "....HU ..... ..... E5 E5 E4 " E; E5 ..H3 ... .HIS .. ..."..CI4,J12 . .......G6 ""JI4 F9 K9 "H13 ..)9 ." . GIS FI1 F15 . ,.Jt,HIO Florida Metropolitan Univcrsity"..,,,G8 Fores! LaKes Elementary School~O"~c.,,:,,:;,"''';:':!i:''.~;'~.J4i'c' Fossil Park"!:"f:.~.,".".'.:'!.";;.o. ,,,;:""",,"c"~,,''';jf,,,,;.;:;"'..K1 ,FgssiI,parkPublic library.. .".m FoliiJiliillS SnoppuYg Cetiier:.:::." '; F2 Fuller Park . Kn G-arrisonjones Elementary School. F4 Gateway Crossing Shopping Center" . """ KIO Gateway Mall". . ..KIO Gibbs lIigtl,Sfh()oJ"c'" ... "c.B17,JIL Gladden Park . ..". H 12 Granada crossing Shopping Center.,.. .. Fi Grant Fteld.",...." . E; Greyhound Terminal,,, ... EI;,G7 GulI to Bay Plaza , ". F7 Gulfport Casino,,, .. .....HI4 Gulfport City Hall. H14 Gulfport P1ewentary School, .,... ."HI4 GulIport Library."" ...HI4 GuJfport Shopping Center.. .. H 14 Hamilton Disston School . . . ...".HI3 Hammock Park. . . E4 Harbor Square.. . . . "G5 Ueatherwoods Apartments,. . .. ".HII Heten Ellis Memorial Hospital",. f1 Heritage Apartments.." " E9 Herifage Park D9 Highland Lakes Shopping Center. " G3 HigJi1ander Park.,,,,,..,, ..M HomeSh{)pping~etwork" . .,..,,,J9 Honeymoon Island" C 3 ICOT Center. . . .. G9 Imperial Pm Apartments.. ... F8 _ Imperial Shopping Center...F; fndlan Rocks Beach Access Park..,. .. ... C8 ...Ql ..n...c", Do .......111' .D16 ,...EU ..C11 Park Street Terminal <<)@~<:Dt: ~Q)f1)fD ~ fD ~ r.f:'l. (!) ~~:~~~-~--~' DRUID RD ,', _:::',';::<J :>tST~;'.. TS'" Downtown St Petersburg & Central Plaza St Petersburg Mam Library D z fill ;; :.., " ; "" .\ 5 ;~, \ C""::,-I,IJy -- ~/ 3:', \ EiJsocial security , Office Edw'ard W'hite Hospital Gl fflSt Petersburg WHS. -C;ntral Plaza-- --", 000(0, ~G)<<)(D: ~@fl)€1): '" '" z z o > t;; ffl Seminole l:!I:.IMS. ffl Seminole l:!I:.IH.S 86 AV N , PARK BLVD/78 AV 1\1 , , -' .~t -, 5~ ~t :::. V' '" , , I , St Petersb'.lrg Junior College z to .., v' I;: " o '" o '"' '" << Midwa) r:1 Plaza I!.!!J ~ z V' ~, r ' 0: ~ '" ;;: ::; Dun~dr ~ ~ ~1 S l2!:J ~ ?~',ST "E'CE 5T ~:, s.,.. - . t 5t Cec"l1a's Schoo I '^ t;:; :: DR M L KI NG Dll, , , b1ondaJobs & Q , BeneULS off m , , ffl Tarpon 'pnngs ; l:Jl:J Fundamental , Elementary School · Helen Ellis ; ill Memonalllospilal @ AlDERMAN pC! Alderman Plaza Ilil Fountains F.:'I Shopping Center IllI ffl Palm Harbor l:!I:.I CDiverslty H 5 @ N:BRA5KA AV Q '" r;j 9 w co 1iJJ -A',P~ pC! ill r!l CU'1LEN QD Pindlas Ccunt, C Sheriff's office I!lliJ ffl Garrison Jones W Elenv,ntary School 0 0 Palm Lake 0 '" '" '" ./> 0 VIllage [5 '" m Dunedtn cc I ::0 '.' H.S >- u iE l- e. 2 ~ ::0 '" 0 u , , , I '0' " . \'1'-(1""" ""t. 0.\/ . a' u""" ' '" z "' ~ I cu '" << -' ~'\I=", S..,.. SUN5E1 POI\T PD > << C.'...,~'.'ETT: ST o > 0:: Cltarv.atcr ~ ~u~r ~ 'CU I DREW 5T M Skycresl CLEVELAND ST l:!I:.IE.S GULHO-BAY BLVD r-'. '60 ' M Clearwaler":::;:/ l:!I:.IH.S. J=L f):::; ...,~:<'::.,E/, P.:) Oak Grove M M.S l:!I:.I \'~P5~::V ~::; 5:',c:"0 PD ;;: o z < o '" cu :E cu '" ;= <:] :: ": EAST BAY DR o '" '" cu I ~ cu '" m~I:~crpns '-'L",o1 'HJ.d6't. o cc :'5 I ~ "' co Bardmoor Mortun plant ~!ease Outpatient Clinic m BRYAN DAIRY RD r:1 Bardmoor Village I!!J Shopping Cemer 'e'2 ,A,\; N o '" >- cu '" '" ~ Starke') ffl E.SW "11h ~trt''2I.~ E S l:!I:.I ---Willial~P~k'\ . 0000' OO~~ (9<<)f])f1) fD €r1> fD €I) i ~@f1) . ~'" ~ Gl ~ llayfronl, All ~1Iildren's &; ~ 5UllCOast Me<1kal Complex f 11 A, 5 32000 r:1Seabreeze IllI Shopping Center C Pinellas County l!!1lITax Collector ,. Ilil Gulf to Bav Plaza ' 142 AV N ULMERTON RD clmerton F.:'I Pointe Plaza d!J o cc :'5 I ~ '" fflRa....l1ng, WES 46 AV N z ~. N ~ t;; N ; ,,V 5 PALM o '" Clu Chi Rodriguez ~ Youth Foundation :is ~ -' -' ::0 ;;E U ;;E Dept. ore Motor Vdtide, l!!1lI \:,,111 25000 'J,,\I:)N S"" r.::l Harbor lilISquare 24000 McMullenrn BoothESl:!I:.I MAl N 5T i)Q~S 5T z V> '" .., PINELLAS PARK Pmellas Park C CityHallllillJ Richard L. Sanders ffl Pinella.s Park n ,chool W Public uhrarl U Pillellas Park ffl PARK BLVD/74 AV N E S W -;:' ,::".\1 ,~ ~ina Harm M Exceptional Ed E S I:Jl:J 52 A'. :\ 54 AV N Z l- V> '" '" fflBlanton l:!I:.IES z I;: ~ 38 AV N m Westgak ffl St Petersburg E 5 W General Ho,pital . 30 AV N InfoLine (727) 530-9911 (Voice/TTY) t;; '" .,. 58 Av N Clearwater .11 ffl E S l:!I:.I r.:3Disston I!!J Plaza ~ ~ ./" '" ~~~ "" '" '"' "'"t;A; ~ '" o .,. ~ '::-.~~i n.U1Dlloll DisSWil co ci:l School C]i~d'l , l"ar~ . '7 .~v'S . East Lake ~ 122 AV N Pinellas Parkside {Dm0 fDfDtJI} Lcalman ffl Compo ~.S W ~ Joe's Creek Industrial Park GlilJllifn f'iill ria St Petcrs~ Shopping Cenler ~hopptn~r:1 Ccnterl!.!J z t;; o .,. z t;; ~ Public Library 18 AV S Gulfpurt Shopping -t:uter 22 AV S/GULFPORT BLVD lakevie" Shoppmg Cenkr Sl Pete"becg Juniur C)~[egt ~ TrHounty B1lsiness Park ~.., , ' , \ , ##v~~ # "() ~ " 01,.~ , "Z I 9- : 01' I I I ~ o '" '" u < '" I- u.J U ..: '" DOUGLAS RD 116 AVN z t;; ~ t;; '"' z '" 54 A'v ,\ :;:: '" o Z t;; '" 38 ~.'I N 30 AV N z t;; .., 22 AV N z z t::; t:; M ~ z t;; 00 Enoch DavL, t::; Center ~ 22 AV S/LAKEVIEW AV Lakewoodffl fflSt Petersburg Fund. E.S l:!I:.I l:!I:.IChallenge t;; Legend -0-- -:-- I' PSTA bus routes -0-- -~~ Downlowner ~ otJ1) .........-... HART Line Express 10 Tampa Pinellas Park Shuttle (route not shown on map) Arrow indicates one way service on a street; dashed line indicates inlermiltent service Pinellas Trail 2 V> .,. Key to landmark symbols rrfl School or university ~ Shopping center or mall E3 Airport Ii Government building m Hospital f3 Public library 53 Park & Ride lot ~ Industrial or office park This map is current as ofSorember 21, 1999, Since changes are likely to occur on some routes, readers should refer to inditidual passenger schedulesfor the most current and detailed routing information, Map designed by Michael Hertz ASSOCIates. ~ew York, NY C 1999 Pmellas SU.1(Oast TrJJ151l.~uthor~ty