The URL can be used to link to this page

DRI2003-09001 ....i l.~~.... ,~- ~ r ~ I- -1-/ 1~ ~ ~ ..,....... P, ~r-::: \ _ tl'.P ~ ....1~ . , " q. ," ,j',p., -~.~ ; o"~ ",. ",'.;.< ';' ~": _"~ ,. , ,~ ';",' 'I I ~J.._" ~' ~" '",;, ';,;.;' ~'--:'I~ ,'f 'l,f " ,--,-: ';".J',~, i:'>~ :,;' :',1"''''' :"V ~ :::,,," ,t ~., _; : ~ ~" ::; .~~,',;it:>,'^, '!.-~'.;- c';-- ;~^ '-'t>~,.:~,-:,~ '--'"-"'?")'::::r~>~"^ ":-"_;'~':,.,_; c'":," ,.'"'-,, -"".';:;:"";'"L< ""'" "'-, V,,-' ." , "" ,,' "'.",..' " ,,,' -'0 ,- '''' "" C, "'.' -: , '.' '. ';"', '-0, . ", '>,', ,',..",'" \, ~ ,-.;,;.).,~ < .'> i/, '.:/,~,: '~"" ,'::"~ "~"~.- ;;" .~;,~"'-_~-,._",:'"~, _'''...,_;;.:;;<:;''' %-.,., ,; ,::'J, t, "[,'''/~i',"'',,_:... 'J';--' i '>::>:J""'~~"" .. ~ '~~r.;?""'~ ~v,_ -'-~" '. "'"''';,'. ".~;., ~ _, 'J~" :...~',\<" /"r....". _,' -<' :".,,' .~~' ""< _'> , " :..-~ ');-; ~__/,''.:.' :, f~_:'_#~~'-, ~,)~":.,.,: ',~"~ ;;/':';;" #.>-,"TS :;:".,n ~ -"':- j;:' ~~< 0; :B" -,:-, ......,:0 ',' '~~'."" " "Ir,;~,:;,a.:'l'~ 0 _~::~', (<<,),,~,' """" " ;: ,:;:~' "?;,,~:" ~Q"' '~~. '@'"'O'\"?f'':,':, "f'~.~':":', '; ":OD"~'~~" ""It' - <,," '\ ".f,.' ~,,'! ;,' ~>" '" ""':''';,'' ~,J\ ~~~_.....f" ~I ........,...^ I~...:i" .... . I' ...oj: l .... < ~ ~ - ~~j .. ,.. \ ., ~ C1 ~;t ,'~... ......... ~~ .:t """ ';(" ,,< ~ " '. ,- , -, > , " " . ',. " ""'" "...~,<:,~, . ~,;;- - ~" ,--:... . '. ; ". '. " "';:' ""c' , , , ' , _ . . ,_ _, e ' ';;~1-- ~f1~"" :,.r: ' _, ,~, .,. ,. !::'.,:. " ~," _" .._' ''",'_, ~ Jpr . .......,., . , "" '-"" ' " ~ ' , _ ,. , "'" ^::- " '. _ ,-, :0 _ . ~' ;'/1'"":' ~k~'~"" ~ . ~ ;". J -"._ ,,' t ',"_- ';';; t' ," "PP.R::O" VA-l-:;' /:'..,".:I~ v " ' ... 1";1': . '" e -, . ,.... - , , EN A '<<), , ,t'~.\-...., 1<"'~ ~ ,~. u','-' , -', r , PM ',~,." ",,~. "1'-'", 1,'!.ft."J'~t~S~l',' ;A"P.:Pi.ICA:t.fON~TO,R.1?E~~~9,." " . . ,>,-,:'~:"<j,':, '-, ':.;-~>>'t, >}.,. ,~'~ ~ ~;..~~-:.,.~~ 1"1;.' '-'" ~' , , . , ,- \. , ';', 0.' ~, . . 'j:' "" _.;;' "<::"'0"" : .r~,,~:?;,' 1;"-:' ;,. " ,__ >,' ' , "" ", ,1<! ,," , " 'c .;: , '_. " ~ "' ,,_, ~ '_~ ,-" ,~ ,,' , , ~. " p;~,-" 1" >".,' ',', ;" - " '-, ~-'"-\A"~' v_,~,:<,_j"._"",~, o{~"''': v'~"' "-. Y"'~-'^'-- .', ;, - ~ "'~-~~~~-='~~~~-~~S-'''''''''':'''''''';'~h;~;,.,):... ' ')-,.. ',\ '~,," f~'T'~ ~""~" "" . 'u,' <";;,." .'J. .\" ", ~ "}.', .:.'" ';.. , "'- "..' '~, _~~ ...' _" {:< >i,*;"~'~~'~-- "fr " ,'" '" ','" c -'O_'~ T.:;" "-5-;..",_", ., " ,".....~ ' ~.-' 'f~^ ~p-.< ,.:t..~' ......f,,"; ""{t ~~ .." ...~,..."- ~"':'t"~""":""-"-:;',l...:...-""i-1"io.-."-.)."_......~~,,,_ "'",-kc,:",.~ ,...."." "~""""'" 0;'l'"","~''''';' 'n1< - ",:", :' .' '.~"J ";"., "'" '\ '--C;,;'(<,,- ""Joe:, ';,v'""";::_'~",."_ /"', N" <~i:J ~ii~0':, ",' L :~~,~,;', "",:",, .. ,.-'"~ .- )~', :,~.,;>";:'" ""~.~,~ ~~~ ,,:' ',.:"- . "",~ ': _," <',,;, "':;,,,-;, T' ,>:".......":\'< ')"" ~,~, .'r' , ,"~, ~ ".' , "P', _'.~. _< "" '" .", ." . "~.', ~, ;:. ',_~,." " ")'I.~........... -...., ~I,~(,,:l" '.' t ,~.."-' ''',., ',.. _ ....,.. "W.-,'r""~" _ ",'" _~("~.,_~,...,.,.,. ,I" ~'!. ~1 '~~>l>it.l;.'*-~<> ~\I'" ~> ~,<>;., c', -0..';,-",:,;" ',"J;' ,,'" _ '".,~, "-~'t'" .', ," ~ ~";",,' '"',_ _ ~~ t' 0<;"" " , ' ' '., ,,,\".,. '( ,y ~~-, ;." "' · '1.,.' ; ",. ,5: '''>''':1' 'j '..:f'; "'., ";, ~~+ ;.", :; "/', \73"',',', 'f " , i" i L ,~...-'::::." >~': ~' , ~ -, '~ ..-,-::~: ~ -; ~',,.,.~~ .,' ,,~-~::;. "~',:;', _ ''', :y ;~" ',.;c" ,~ Jjl.--f "~~,...~~"' J';'~j'<~~'I" :>~:' '.t.~"" ' , '.' {;'~"~~" ".,.,.,. ?r"\,,~ '" ~',"'.;' ,'<r~-.,_~,>,' ,"" ,_~ .. p. ~ ~~, ", ,~" "'\~ .~"'""" '" '; '>, V',,;: '-." '-~^'"J....' " .it,"'.., .f1>J1o,::;~,t,~. -!',,'~-,~,*~ ~'~~) -f",1;"J'''!,' h '",," ,'",',~ _,_ ~ ~1.{. "-,;,~'-'-',;"~ 'I :, ~,.::.o.'tl:. . 't',"'<~}r;_"';".'" ",,_'_ Je;~\~t ~{ '~:~/!'" '~'~.i,:',',""., '"-~ '. ' ~~: ~,>. ,,-;' J' ""_ ^," ; t J ... ~ ~ ~~~'\..-... t~'-1 ~ :'-"~ r: : ~ t ~!Ip :(,..J ~. ~.. v "\ ...........-=. ......\'~"1--..\..,.r:;t'~"'i.I'...... ~_ ....~~ 1.>""";~-Tl"::-.,..~'~l ~i;~"~-<,~-"~,,--.. t"r ~ --"" ~"t" .;. f. f' y l:~ ~r-j. T ... r \~ :;,~;. u~.qt~",.J~_I/~1 t..~r;,{"..~ l- ...... -:: J.....-:. ~~J~:;,,_'-,: _~ ~ .~...~ 1..... ~ <J;"'_ ~""'.Q._~.oi"_ ~.I -.. ,....~ \f"'{.~ ~""""""jI;"'!~ ~ ^>.-1 "'-r.~p:,t -.Jri;'i,~~ ~...:'..;.:~'l!. -' +... _ \o<l 'i7~;.t ~\ ).t:.... .... v oJ:-~ r' .~; \7~:;{t~-..'"~\ l~L;~X~~.~Sj.\ ~~f~;',f-.~ ~f :~ ~MJ; I I DP~;:;:;. J' I I, I ,I 'I 'I I, I ,I I, I, I I I I I I I' J- ~ i 1 /', ' "'{ ~...... , METRO Development Corporation July 16, 1982 Ms. Sheila Benz DRI Coordinator Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council 9455 Koger Boulevard, Suite 219 St, Petersburg, Florida 33702 Mr. David Healey Plannlng Director Clty of Clearwater 112 South Osceola Avenue Post Office Box 4748 Clearwater, Florida 33518 LIBRfl r~vP 41:.\, \' C...'\...... "'" ' V '-II "V' J: .i. '" lEG AMPA BA Y ~ I'LANNtNG COUNOI. Dear Ms. Benz and Mr. Healey: Metro Development Corporation is pleased to present this Development of ~egional Impact Applicatlon for Development Approval for Park Place, With this letter I am certifying that copies were either hand delivered on this date or sent by Certified Mail to the attached list of reviewing agencies. We and our consultants have made a sincere effort to comply wlth the lnformatlon requirements of the DR! process and to provlde com- plete and accurate information for your review. We stand ready to respond immediately to any requests you may have for clarification of answers or to assist in any other way to expedlte a timely approval process. If questlons should arise durlng the sufficiency review, I would appreciate your calling them to our attentlon at the earliest possible time to permit us to begin preparing appro- priate responses. Thank you in advance for your consideration. yours, LOpm~ CQRPORATION \ ; '\~'1 'l rry~. olfe Vice President LDW/bw Attachment 128 WEST PEACHTREE STREET, N W , , TELEPHONE (404) 881-lU31 ATLANTA GEORGIA 30308 r I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I I I I DRI APPLICATION TRANSMITTAL LIST Mr. David Healey, Plannlng Director City of Clearwater P. O. Box 4748 Clearwater, Florida 33518 (25 Copies) Ms. Sheila Benz, DR! Coordinator Tampa Bay Regional Planning Councll 9455 Koger Blvd., Suite 219 St. Petersburg, Florida 33702 (12 Copies) Mr. Wayne Lasseter District Planning Engineer Florida Department of Transportatlon P. O. Box 1249 Bartow, Florida 33830 Mr. Robert J. Krzeminski Florida Department of Transportatlon Haydon Burns Building 605 Suwannee Street Tallahassee, Florida 32301 Mr. William Hennessey, Distrlct Manager Department of Environmental Regulation 7601 Highway 301 North Tampa, Florida 33610 Attn: Mr. Gene Sullivan Mr. L. Ross Morrell State Archaeologist and Chief, Bureau of Historic Sites & Properties Division of Archives, History and Records Managment The Capitol Tallahassee, Florida 32301 Mr. Brian Barnett Environmental Services Office Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission P. O. Box 1840 Vera Beach, Florida 32960 Ms. Linda Cannon, Manager Plannlng and Program Development Division Southwest Florida Water Management District P. O. Box 457 Brooksville, Florida 33512 METR03:Ll I, I, ,I, I I I I' ,I I I, I: ,I, II 'I I, I I I I DRI APPLICATION TRANSMITTAL LIST (Continued) Mr Art W1lde Office of Executive Director Department of Natural Resources 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32303 Mr. Leonard E1zie, Chief Bureau of Economic Analys1s Department of Commerce Co111ns Building Tallahassee, Florida 32304 Mr. James W. May, Chief Department of Veteran and Community Affairs Division of Local Resource Management 2571 Executive Center Circle, E. Tallahassee, Florida 32301 Attn: Ms. Diana Sawaya-Crane Mr, Nicholas Carama1is Area Engineer Corps of Engineers P. O. Box 19247 Tampa, Florida 33686 Mr. Joe Kubicki Pinel1as County Metropolitan Planning Organization 315 Court Street Clearwater, Florida 33516 Mr. Jake Stowers Pine1las County Environmental Management 315 Court Street Clearwater, Florida 33516 7/13/82 METR03:L2 r I I I TABLE OF CONTENTS Ir PAGE LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL I TABLE OF CONTENTS ,I PART I I QUESTIONS 1-9 APPLICATION INFORMATION 1-1 QUESTION 11 MAPS 11-1 I PART II I QUESTION 12 GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION 12-1 QUESTION 13 ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES: AIR 13-1 I QUESTION 14 ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES: LAND 14-1 QUESTION 15 ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES: WATER 15-1 I, QUESTION 16 ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES: WETLANDS 16-1 I' QUESTION 17 ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES: FLOOD PLAINS 17-1 QUESTION 18 ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES: VEGETATION AND WILDLIFE 18-1 ,I QUESTION 19 ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES: HISTORICAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES 19-1 'I QUESTION 20 ECONOMY: EMPLOYMENT AND ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS 20-1 QUESTION 21 PUBLIC FACILITIES: WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT 21-1 I QUESTION 22 PUB LI C FACILITIES: DRAINAGE 22-1 I QUESTION 23 PUB LI C FACILITIES: WATER SUPPLY 23-1 QUESTION 24 PUB LI C FACILITIES: SO LI D WASTE 24-1 I' QUESTION 25 PUB LI C FACILITIES: ENERGY 25-1 QUESTION 27 PUBLIC FACILITIES: RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE 27-1 I I, ii II METR02:Q I I QUESTION 28 PUBLIC FACILITIES: HEALTH 28-1 I, QUESTION 29 PUBLIC FACILITIES: PO LI C E 29-1 QUESTION 30 PUB LI C FACILITIES: FIRE 30-1 I QUESTION 31 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES: TRANSPORTATION CONSIDERATIONS 31-1 I QUESTION 39 OFFICE PARKS 39-1 QUESTION 43 SHOPPING CENTERS 43-1 I APPENDIX I LETTER TO CITY OF CLEARWATER APPENDIX II TBRPC PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW I, APPENDIX III TECHNICAL APPENDIX TO TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS il II I, ,\ ,I I 'I I I - - I iii 'I I METR02:Q I' I I I I, I;. I I I I' I' I I 'I I I' I 'I I ~ -~- ("';- ,) _I,''''' LIST OF TABLES TABLE NUMBER TITLE PAGE 12~ 1 Development Phaslng Plan 12- 3 12- 2 Existing and Proposed Land Uses 12- 4 13- 1 Cumulative Dally Emissions 13- 2 14- 1 Soil Descriptions and Interpretations 14- 2 16- 1 Wetland Acreage 16- 1 18- 1 Wildlife Species 18- 9 20- 1 Construction Phase Expenditures and Employment 20- 2 20- 2 Permanent Employment and Payroll by Phase 20- 4 20- 3 Employment Income Distribution 20- 7 20- 4 Estimating Methods and Assumptions for Employment, Payroll and Income ProJectlons 20- 8 20- 5 Ad Valorum Tax Estimates 20-14 24- 1 Solid Waste Generation 24- 2 25- 1 Projected Electrical Energy Demand 25- 2 31- 1 Seasonal Traffic Variations 31- 6 31- 2 Levels-of-SerVlce Concept 31-12 31- 3 CPTA Study Area Service Characteristics 31-17 31- 4 Transportation Improvement Program 31-20 31- 5 Mobile Home Park Trip Generation Assumptions 31-22 iv 590-298.04 METR03: 0 ,II I, LIST OF TABLES (Continued) I I TABLE NUMBER TITLE PAGE I 31- G Mobile Home Park Trip Generation 31-23 31- 7 Park Place Trip Generation Assumptlons 31-28 I 31- 8 Person Trip Generatlon 31-30 " 31- 9 Vehicle Trip Generation 31-32 31-10 Transit Trip Generation 31-34 I 31-11 External/Internal Split for Vehicle Trips 31-35 31-12 Vehicle Trip Length Frequency 31-37 'I , 31-13 Traffic Impact Summary 31-58 I' ~- I' I I II I I I v 'I METR03:D 590-298.04 I I' I I I I I- I I J I I I I I I I I 'I I LIST OF EXHIBITS EXHIBIT NUMBER MAP A MAP B MAP C MAP D and F MAP E MAP G MAP H MAP I 17- 1 21- 1 23- 1 24- 1 24- 2 24- 3 25- 1 25- 2 29- 1 30- 1 31- 1 31- 2 31- 3 TITLE General Location Map Recent Aerial Photograph Topographic Map EXlsting Land Use and Vegetation Associations Soil Types Master Drainage Plan Master Development Plan PubllC Facilities and Servlces Letter from City of Clearwater Letter from City of Clearwater Letter from Clty of Clearwater Letter from City of Clearwater Letter to Pinellas County Letter from Pinellas County Letter to Florida Power Corporation Letter from Florida Power Corporation Letter from Clty of Clearwater Letter from City of Clearwater Street Network Inventory Existing Average Daily Traffic Volumes Hourly Traffic Variations 1982 Peak Hour Turning Movements 31- 4 PAGE 11- 1 11- 2 11- 3 11- 4 11- 5 11- 6 11- 7 11- 8 17- 2 21- 2 23- 2 24- 4 24- 5 24- 7 25- 4 25- 6 29- 2 30- 2 31- 2 31- 4 31- B 31-10 & 31-11 vi METR03: E 590-298.04 (" I I I LIST OF EXHIBITS (Continued) I, EXHIBIT NUMBER TITLE PAGE I 31- 5 1982 Trafflc Levels-of-Service 31-15 31- G CPTA Study Area Routes 31-16 I 31- 7 1985 Average Daily Traffic Volumes 31-24 31- 8 1988 Average Daily Traffic Volumes 31-25 I' 31- 9 1991 Average Daily Traffic Volumes 31-26 I. 31-10 Slte Approach Distribution 31-37 31-11 Phase I Average Daily TrafflC Volumes 31-41 I 31-12 Phase I Peak Hour Turning Movements 31-42 & 31-43 31-13 Phase I Levels-of-Service 31-45 I 31-14 Phase II Average Daily Traffic Volumes 31-47 31-15 Phase II Peak Hour Turning Movements 31-48 & 31-49 I 31-16 Phase II levels-or-Service 31-50 I 31-17 Phase III Average Dally Traffic Volumes 31-52 31-18 Phase III Peak Hour Turning Movements 31-53 & 31-54 I 31-19 Phase III Levels.of-Service 31-55 31-20 Phase I Recommended Highway Improvements 31-60 I 31-21 Phase I At-Grade Intersection Improvements 31-62 I 31-22 Phase II Recommended Highway Improvements 31-65 31-23 Phase II At-Grade Intersection Improvements 31-67 I 31-24 Phase III Recommended Highway Improvements 31-68 31-25 Phase III At-Grade Intersection Improvements 31-70 I 31-26 Phase III Site Transportation Improvements 31-77 I vii I' METR03:E 590-298.04 I I I ,I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT Applicatlon for Development Approval Under Section 380.06(6), Florida Statutes PART I. Application Information 1. I, Larry D, Wolfe, the authorized representative of Metro Development Corporation, hereby propose to undertake a Development of Regional Impact as defined in Section 380.06, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 22F-2.07, Florida Administrative Code. In support thereof I submit the following information concerning Park Place which information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, :rvly J~ J {q~z- (date) 2. APPLICANT (Name, Address, Phone) Metro Development Corporation 728 West Peachtree Street NW Atlanta, Georgia 30308 (404) 881-0431 3, AUTHORIZED AGENT Larry D, Wolfe 728 West Peachtree Street NW Atlanta, Georgia 30308 (404) 881-0431 4. ATTACH THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PERSONS HAVING FEE SIMPLE OR LESSER ESTATE IN THE SITE. The site is owned in its entirety by Sidney Colen. 5. ATTACH A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT SITE. INCLUDE SECTION, TOWNSHIP AND RANGE. Commencing at the center of Section 17, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida, run S 89046101" W, 660.00 feet along the East- West mid-section line of said Section 17; thence N 00020'13" W, 50.00 feet for a POINT OF BEGINNING; thence by the fo 11 owi ng three courses along the North rightof-way line of State Road 60; S 89046'01" W, 58.83 feet; thence N 00013159" W, 10.00 feet; thence S 89046101"W, 1319.05 METR02:N1 590-298.06 I' I I I" I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I feet; thence N 01003104uE. 600.15 feet; thence S 8904610111W, 211.05 feet; thence N 0100310411 E, 554.13 feet, thence S 8905410411 W. 389.49 feet, thence by the following four courses along the East right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 19: N 0100310411 E, 28.15 feet; thence 72 82 feet along the arc of a curve to the right, radi us 192.00 feet, chord N 1105510211 E, 72.39 feet; thence N 2204615911 E, 11.93 feet; thence 16,14 feet along the arc 0 f a curve to the 1 eft, radi us 238. 00 feet. chord N 20050 I 27" E, 16.13 feet; thence N 89054104" E, 1222.38 feet along the North line of the Southwest 114 of the Northwest 114 of sa i d Sect ion 17 ; thence N 000211 3211 E, 1337. 05 feet along the West 1 i ne 0 f the Northeast 114 of the Northwest 1/4 of sai d Section 17; thence S 8905714011 E. 1312.30 feet along the North line of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Secti on 17; thence S 0002011311 E, 2337.74 feet along the West ri ght-of- way line of Hampton Road; thence S 8904610111 W, 627.00 feet; thence 5 00020'1311 E, 280.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. The afore described parcel of land also being described as follows: Commence at the center of Section 17, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Pi ne 11 as County, Flori da and go S 89046 I 0111 W, 660,00 feet. along the South boundary of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17 (the East-West centerl i ne of sai d Secti on 17;) thence N 00019 12111 W. 50.00 feet, to a point on the North right-of-way line of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard - State Road 60 for a POINT OF BEGINNING; thence, following said North right-of- way line, S 89046101" W, 58,49 feet; thence N 0001315911 W, 10.00 feet; thence 5 8904610111 W. 1319.21 feet; thence, leaving said North right- of-way line, N 01004'0411 E, 599 99 feet; thence S 89046101" W, 198.43 feet; thence N 00052121" E. 554.70 feet; thence S 89054149" W, 400.06 feet, to a point on the East right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 19; thence, fo 11 owi ng said East ri ght- ofway 1 i ne. N 010041 041' E. 28. 15 feet; thence along a curve to the right that has a radius of 192.00 feet, an arc length of 72.82 feet, a chord length of 72.39 feet, a chord bearing of N 1105610411 E. thence N 2204715811 E, 11. 93 feet; thence along a curve to the left that has a radius of 238.00 feet, an arc length of 16.13 feet, a chord 1 ength of 16.13 feet, a chord beari ng of N 20051' 27" E, to a poi nt on the North boundary of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17; thence, leaving said East right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 19, N 8905414911 E, 1222.19 feet, along the North boundary of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17 to the Southwest corner of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17; thence N 00022128" E, 1337.33 feet, along the West boundary of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 17 to the Northwest corner of said Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4; thence S 89056111" E, 1312.06 feet, along the North boundary of said Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 to a point on the West right-of-way line of Hampton Road - County Road 144; thence S 0001912111 E, 2337.71 feet, along sai d West ri ght-of-way 1 i ne; thence S 89046'01/1 W, 627.00 feet; thence S 00010121" E. 280.00 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING, containing 99.133 acres, more or less. Subject to easements and rights-of-way of record. I nformat 1 on taken from survey by L1 overas , Baur & Stevens. Co ns u 1 t i n9 Engineers-land Surveyors, Clearwater, Florida, February 23, 1982. METR02: N2 590-298.06 I' I I, I I I" I 'I I I I I I I I I I I I 6. TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT AND SIZE, As defined under Chapter 22F-2.10 F.A.C. the project is a shopplng center and office development. The site encompasses approximately 99,1 acres, and would eventually include a maximum of 460.000 square feet of retail space and 1,500,000 square feet of offlce space. 7. HAVE YOU REQUESTED A DRI BINDING LETTER OF INTERPRETATION OR VESTED RIGHTS DETERMINATION FROM THE DIVISION OF STATE PLANNING PURSUANT TO SECTION 380.06(4), FLORIDA STATUTES? No 8. LIST ALL LOCAL GOVERNMENTS WITH JURISDICTION OVER THE PROPOSED DEVELOP- MENT. Presently both the City of Clearwater and Pinellas County have jurisdic- tion. Following completion of annexation, the City of Clearwater will have sole jurisdiction. 9. LIST ALL AGENCIES (LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL) FROM WHICH APPROVAL AND/OR A PERMIT MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INITIATION OF DEVELOPMENT. INDICATE THE PERMIT OR APPROVAL FOR EACH AGENCY, Florida Department of Environmental Regulatlon (a) Application for Installation of Sewage Collectlon/Transmission System (b) Application for Approval of Plans and Specifications for Public Water Supply System (c) Notice of Stormwater Discharge Florida Department of Transportation (a) Driveway Permit (b) Utility Permit Southwest Florida Water Management District None required Clty of Clearwater (a) Subdivision Record Plats (b) Construction Permits for Improvements METR02:N3 590-298.06 a' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I, ~.'. "'~'-~:'I{'-'!' ';~."('.,~:,~ t- . \'~ ,..,,!, Ill<' r.- , l ..,....,'.."'~.>,,..- -ft) ~!l:.."". ~ - --/f.,r.../'"\ l-- L. - ~':"~O".,:,,~~ _~ "''fM;':': -.A ~-, _ I tl'"'~ -=-::;;. -= ~ "-. ......-:::: -...r-I \. ... r _ 1.,;"L"Libi. ....., I- "1: '\....:1i I" '-....-f""* _~ . _~ - ~.- .......-- . .-=<,,;"'1 '.\ o:-'r..:,( 'i~,r;::.."............., -. ~. · ''''. ~ - -::--K". I ,,~_":::_ '.11~ _- !-_~_ "1OQ.OT'l UY Il..' ~.._~, i ...~~....d.~ .... , " . :II . -e_~col ~. ~,;,.;:. ~ ~",~1='-oC-~.'): ",,,::,,,:~"''''''~~rl..'~b. .....JCt.. __ - I~ F~'\JI - '!~~""':':c.'on.~;~.---~~..o~~~- ,.'")~ ~- J~ IZ--PI..7".rI'L.A'-S t'll.~~_--~~'~_..... .., ';'_,\5''''1 PU. . '!'. l -'~g,.~ '~1:' K.'. '> (....,..... 'y <- I'I"II:;.~ _.... - - - , !~~~~..._r.:l; t;.. r.. ..........,~" ~;t~~~""'~ ~"1T "'~,L....,~ 40~t J ' -. ~ - t ...~ ;.e{O~1 ~""O""'" ~ '-,.."..>;.... v - -:,.. I ~ ~ - (' \ W r ' 1."D.noo -- - _- / . _:fIII,.Dl.UI:I RHtJGH ~ ~'T.: :.: J,f J.:.U'':J!'''' "2; ~~1~ ~ ~ -...... tf::2 = I~IJO~"" _ ~_ .____ - -.. ~ '7 ~ ...... .-':-~:""""".J-,:\_-.j..I';l""':J'" ...i.... .., :"~ ':;1~... -r--~I _...J:GtU.Z..... __ I "+..........;i.. oJ~'" r..... ..... -:: .6 ~ ;tr.....; .....t "'++~:- ..... h....~ ...~. .. La; ~~ I ~.:r) ~"'~.o .... ~ 1 : - ~ t'fIUr ~J ~ , ' " , . - ,~~. - ,->.... ~ - ' !~K .- , < IJ "=- , ~'" F - . - - - .- _'.~,!:O:~M~'. x- ~.."~~ - A 0"_, ..... ,,.. .~J -- ~ '.::' ~ ' ,::~. . .' : "~, !, "\f;~'i,:h",":.h, ~.. ~~ . '" ~.~~ ';) ~ I ...", ~', ";T"~' f""T' I - ..... , '.' :. '.' .: ::.~-~. -~~ ~ ~- ~ji~ -.;:. -'''' r!.lo", - . t ... . ..'l,.."0.4....,$J/.,..fW:r.. ;;. \ - __ , .. t """t "" ,..~~410,_ ,~~h... .....:,..~ Q....~"*^ ~95 19 ~.. ~.~~ ~ J~ , - 1 - f~ .:- :...:_::..:",:: ~.,:..',,:. ':'~V::'~"'-~1-"'" V:;.~).. 1 - \' lit ~~ : -, ~ :..-: ," '; < ' -::"!"l'-,;:r,> :;~.~ l'~~O,N SPRINGS ~ I " I.." ..- l "",'I~~, I~~ .. . ... &:I<r ... :..:... ...: _. .... ~\",,,......~ ....._,.~ t!........, ''W. I I ~ 1 ~ If"n.._ r t _ c~ ....._ . ., ... ... "'-.. tt .:-'" ...... ...... ~~.. (.I' ...... ~..... -"'t;l .I.....:-~po" ~",Ilt4!i ..... ~ I _~ . __ "~:'~- , ,'..' - ::'~~. _ ' . ~ - o,,,......g y.... rg..t"" u,a fll: (L I I' \ ;r - .,.... .' ',. - ,'. ,'M' ..... ~ .~.-, ,,: l\' t-l.-- An-_--_-t ...:., ~'.. ':.. . .,'~ ','. ~ , ~~,.;: ~'S"t' """"1 I'. "1'-\ . \"' I ., \.... '- ., I ~ - ~ '~., .... " ~-~ - ~..--t:;.~rz. b)) . - - .... : .... .... .... ",,,~t~ ....... .. ..~...~-~~ 1 ...,.~" .....:f ~ ... ~ .~ ~ .,.. :. -':-,~. :-.-;~ -" 'b'" . .~- .~~ i"I~l=~, .....\... I I : ~'- ~ _-_&0<11..-- t. ""'W... J; ....--....G...OfIlftA->.. ... ~ ~\..~I i:\ I~ ~ ,.' . ~ ,-,...: ~-, . ,- ":'$'~~ \" ~ . .,-.,~ I 11 ~ ...: t ..:-... t ~ ..... !.o~.. t -:.:...~;1-..:t~...f ...::'~~\ w...Sv~" .. _I 9; II f7 ;:I :IS ~~>> .,; . t t ~ .:l:"'=:; "f.,l......,.. '.tv..... _W-~~ v.. ~ .... .~ ~ t ~ ..: ;. '.:..............,.,'~:_.\.J~~~~..;.. ...,~~~5M:':4~ ... . "......... \-"'11 ,.o~ _ __.,...... ;:: : I'Oq, ~ .r.. '.,' ,~; ,.:.. al ":l..J~.......~,:..\....V.rV ~ .;.,';:, ;; E\.? " # --T -zilaa::. 1,,1L.....'<:;:.xU ....... ..t... '\ .......::( .......... ....l.~~"".... ....~..,,!:-Ji: ~-::tR'f;r"}jlil.. .;- ""'~t i1f...,.\ ~ ' Vj-fl ..~.. .t'" ;..t"r~;." '\": ,-,t'~tH-y...~yt... ~..l~::i'S1:1:~CIo+ I ;u .,....... U ~ ~ l> " ~ \ ! On .'L-.' . ...... ti_....t ~ ... t:",. "'''!:r.,,''' ~..,-o:.....t.... \ 19 --, , ... . : ..~<:l~~~i-~~~:}iF~~.::?f1 ^ ~ - p",.."~~ J; I - .J m' ~'f , ~- ;;"1'~' - l~/ ~ : , "~ ~,S' "-~'1.'::'J-"l. 0"" ::-:'::(~ '~':$'''\'' ~J! ' ~.., .;---u ~ ..~,. \. - ~ - 0::1 : .. _~:-rt ~...,.; (""~"6<<:l\ "~~ttl~;; .~$..I~--:~ie::7:r.;f ~~ ~ .:. ~ t..,l J. 1 I u QJ. _ s"~ ....iIII.-loj._.II'r~.... ;::;:~....,::'./~~~"'~{~r:(1..?~\.~j""~ I I ~ _ .... :~ ......I_~.:.... :-.t..t.."....rJ'l.. ...,...J.!~"II!\""""~'" tlt.t'...;::"\ ..~"\.- .. 1\ I I -t i ~ . ~ "'.~-\..\ \.t~ It; t ,.~~~ ~ - t- ...~lr.~r.:; - ~ - '~:~~,~ ~~~:v~ .~;f-. :i'Z.!'1't ,,; -.i,lJlQj~ 5io'" c. '-"F-f -' I j' - C ~kJ - 'j tOo< ",;~:;;~::~1,..., .~~ ~.....~ "~L,..~,t:..,.,.:::iir:"'':.i'.f''~I~~Jr& I '-.::-- ; -;:J~I: l ... ~ -~r .- '~<.' '<;:,s':t:i.. ;};,.":;';j;;,.' ,.~~) '~''::-, :~::t".It.: p"- -1' - - . ..'.~' ~ i '" "~,'~. · - -..;, . '. -; t - ~ ":';1,-- ~ ~:" ,.. '.. , \ ' _~ I - .. ". ~ .,/'*t~ ~"''3"..-, '#J8''J,f"? l'~,.f."+ 'J-t \'t i~.;~:r:;.'"'I ~ l"o 51 v-..."... -- l ~ (,. ! I l to- 1 . .; ~,:;~~~,,:'" <"}\''::.', '''-5:asa: i",,~M'Z~ -- ,k~\\ ~ -~-_. -i -- '- .: ~~, ~"".;..,..::.. :'.:'_~"'''/-I''::'.1::" &[(-~ (1' "'.... I I 1.\. \, J_~.,L - ~ ~''''"'~'''.... '''''''',.":,: '...,.... I, ~ ./M.~'" ~'_ .I:J L'..! .;..~. \,' lM .., '". " '.' ~r-r:.- j . , .":. 't~!'!.,,~~.-~-::-...: ";. r:"''''-ji'i-,.. , . ~-- ~,. -..,0- :\ ~...: " ~ '1 ,.- " ~~ \0:, ;J........;.,';'.-== :q"l......t tI..-~J:;-:,:tlf};+Io.~~ 1...........1 ;... ~~ _ :A.. w.,.l'" t ;:'\ \ 1..... _ _ , . ._",;;-"-:"'~1 '~_Oooj. ~k~,%i.._:'1f t; DUNEDIN .~l......... ";Ir"i: 1 J ,I ,1V5&t_'.. ~f: _ r '. . "'1':;'-:l~ ..,~,,~ ....-.:,.....f.1.W.:~,/.!! - ~'1f-' ........ ~ ~ . YfC... ~~ ......,,;,[ ..._" - .. . " :~"Ef'~/i!!,~'~"..:'~.:::r~ ,'r">' 'J - - _." I, "'1)'... ~.~ l. ~ . . ,; ?::- i~"~' · ~;:: -:\~~.:....~:;;~ "..,. CD " ." II ..... ..J ~.;; -' . ,'" ...~~ I!>...:~ ~~ I · . , ..~... if., )..". '_ ~.. .0. _ "ij -. , . " OLDSMAR' I"!!O:....... ... .. ~... ~::$ rt"~ r.....;...;-;:.I'!.--tr=- 5H.. #' ) === \ l ~ ,~~ r:.~ ~=oIio'~l"J-:"" l'.... ~........ .. ./ ..... .........,,-.;;T ..,...~J~...""Ii..rn ........~_ ~ I ...~1;,."""".....N~ ~.~I" ( ~ ... ~.. _ ",., \~"''''-5 o:::.Jr~~~~ -......;: 'l811<au-....,~ "l""'IT."~"'\ ...'1:; l =c ~ . 1 ~ ," ~~~'~ .;i:'*~~tt.l':9' . - I' :L.'f" 1 '" Iil 1,111 ..-! '" ~ I... "'...... ~"~~:':":""~-::-'~ I. ~....- ~ ~"t ~~. - ~ ;..I.l r""" =... - ~ ~ I c......!580 ~ ;..,t It' ~ ~ ,:~~U~IIIII........ ...!. """ . ' ~ .,.....,.:'" ~ ~'7.~'f"q"~:: ".... lIll...... "' 1 -- .l..,. 4 ..f i.~-:: ~"""'...'fl "" "ii". ':II ~ ~ .n..:,.. 0:.";... 1"...... V~~;".IY~'...-+"::. ,~_~ ..~. l l ...~ ~~-. ~ ~...'~..-;.~" . ......." ~ 510 :"~'::--;~':';."'~~~~;;"Z~~3"'-'~t' '; 1: - '~-:-,. ,7 -~ltl\~'\"X~:~~' tit: 'f"'~v.: ::r ,.. , -.' -';'?,'; 1"'.:- :~\\;:., ,:1_ >, ,'..' ~ ,~ 1 .. .', \....... _ lit" . r, \. 11--> i 'i ..~.I-l!~ ~- Jr ~ ::f~~' .. .........:..,. I-~~ .....("'}I.QiI't...,. ~ -, I ~ 1; d \.," t1t -c;;...~,.. -~ '\~ "'f"" ...::;i ".:.-~ !\.l:..v....."st...~... '.........,,, u ~~ - ",. t\ ....,..J.,i: I ..) .....l "'l_~."'~ .j \! #' ..r ..c.; \ !.....=~ ~... "t j.~ ....J....-:(. ~ ..II 'l- r S90... iP1 ",~~"":2'!- .....~If~ "'" I..... ..,.+';. -; r",\..\ IIIIQOIII~:-..."" fL" ,. ~ t t" ': ""of>,. ("r;;, ~~....."'" ...... -... -, ~,:;;,,1... _",~' ~.:..'l'';Q-; ..'''' R'/hH//M'..A "" L.!.... (1)0,,, ""'1'''' 1..' , . ~':' ,,:./,~!;~ " ~ ~.. :; ",:;. J:.~ ~1'~y.~~~~-!J;.~"'! ~'~: .1.111 ----.., :n..1 . - --- ~-::..;:"~'';r' ~" ~ ",; ~:.'..f' ,-:::.. - :-... . ~~' - ~ ~..f!~ )t.,...... ...:..;>-:, ~'\;~.r':... :: -l'" ~""!!o.~.--.. ...I. "'1""1 ~~ fUc:.. I...... l..! ~ ,.,. J ....~;I:' ....10.:.. #'..: tf ~ oJ _.~ t.... ~~ ~....... ~ "........r ~~:...tJ...,. ..1.. -:. ....."<l'''''= - L-_ -.... 111:1,,11 r -- !ss ......... -.... ... ~. ,a".,' l"'#' ~......... t- . .;:' -r:': ~1t,:."l. ....J.::.=:~Hi;, '" -~~ h:--r ~ lmi'fi ,II ~ I~'SAFET'! HAR80Rr' ~~<~tli:. .' :,~.~,}',';,,~..... ;~""'''~..--;':~1.f.... ~~fF~~i;;f= t:1... ~.....I lo.-... .. ~L1I~-"'1 ,l .. ""..~.ll~'r.l.."'::"-:;.t....,~;, .. - .... ~....f",/" .~:I: Ii ~ r#'".~-t.."" ftt'o.f"t'~' \';.".: ~'----....." ~ -~,.. -ll1j _ 1&J'Wi .J1'''i-ir~'''''''' ..I...... '.. ~.... ~~. :_.....-..........~ ......~ ~l.....~"";:;-- ......1 .....t;l -":'I.. t -- U I' A' r-c....l'l:. ~ o;::;:::zI . "'lot ... ... '" ...~. t;a...... '" 'l.t.' I '"..., .... t, .,. .... ..... _., . -eo.., ,- '.;!','" , ~!l9D ~I L........... ' .... , ".' -, <" ......,. "'" "...t...~.. . ,"to.' .. . - \ ";..' ."."l...... ... ., li; ';-:c!- "'" ~. ... III ... t...... . "".. Jo" ill. ~ ~.:'! 1!~ ~':.y ~~~~~: ,,~_ . . . ~,: ;;,., ' ~~I PROJECT SITE .:\'.?~...::'~ ;.;~;;~'~~r :'..~;':.-:: & ~1.f 601t"':f.;I J..~ ~~':a"1'iII ., _~~ l~_:!..;" ... ~~ '~"::"',t::~;"~~:f~'~!T - -, -- 590_~!9)~,.,!! I' 1,.1,.~~w-B~:;>~'"5::::::-~60~eo~;",;.'~. '..." ... 1. ....... or. "",..~ .. '(.,;1, "-;r~4' - J Q .'51 f r t h .., ........ 't. ~. ~ ~'l~ ,....... ... ..., ... . >-1' :,J.4..J;;r":,, i;f-:_~~;.I:,.'J--- ' .... CL..EARWATER ~ 'r:r ~-u.'" I ~ ".' . . ." -;.' ':,-, I " .''';,'''''''''- . -! .:' , -:~ _;,JL-1~y.'" -,;f';\':"!"~ I .;;j , 11-0... 60 ....J... .. ~ '!Ii; f-" ... ",~.....__....... ..~. ':'r" ",=:,:,Jt"J-;I"'~ JJL"'- ......-.. ...\,.,~~:;.....:..... .... ". - p';;:. .. ... .... "";j;.. ~ 1lAa8 . IG ~ ).....:: '"'=-!. 1. ........ ~ ,'" .... - . - ~.. t 1 , . ~- ',;:. " -po;, ~ I """ . .. -.... ' ' j C 'WI",',-,;L.,~~!,-~ - . '" '" ." , '" ..... :: ~ ~~i0I'~;'I.;w;~+,~.tJI~. - ~~~.-:r~llU ~H. ~'l~';'t'~ .::'..o~.,;: ::: ~-~~,...:, .~.~::(~/ ~:. ,;" ~',~,' -:'~ :;,:.. ""-~~""'.~.';:''Cf'''lt'''~''';' 'i~, -.. b..~.;: ~', - " ~"-" -,- .~ . ~:; :".,~" ~ ......"...~ "&..;'~_........-.,, --'" t..-:::.:o...) ~;I""""""'t.'" .:~~ ~ ......... \.'.........;!o-~."'.t;:-""'~r...... .:." ;:...' "{'~ ~ __~:r -l . g.....'T"_ .<f'. -f: . ,'., "C - , I,', -:: .', ,," C'o" - ~..t'...~~~.,.. ;,r...~"t""':: ~t'.~J l :1-'..../;. ..:~... .. ~ - .;... ~ ... ......~ ........ t.l · ~"!!::." @"" ,x~'".;~..'" _ '1' .~I; =7'".:" ..,';~.,~ ,.' ~- = ... '-.' '.~ '~'~..""i\1 ~ ..... ...~ ~ tt ..;'''-1 v.~. ~ ~""I t il;"~ J I~; L '.-.{'"...__ "'\,+: ,- I' r" - .. .. t........ .. ..i t I \.-....-.. ,.,..:. - ,~.I (:' ELLEA1R 595A' ... ._.. .' . I...... ....-- ~~r.:~,':lM.' ,'~ " '" ~~ ',' ,'. .,~,,~,', ,/. r,-" llEAI ~....~:;:""... ...., ~"~~ lo, . ,-- -.~ ~ ~,";,Jt.,," ~..... .. ,.. ~...-.. t ... 4....t..r........ ....... EACH I~~:;i"'~""i-~"";-l..~i' . ~~ ~ ;~JW' - .I'U~J"'\"" ~ -',a..'"-. r.... ":. ~.!'r1 .......... I: ~.. ~............... _ ......... "-:'..'" '.-.:. ~... C""T'~ . GENERAL LOCATION MAP MAP A II I I I I I I I ,I I I I I I I I I I I AERIAL PHOTO ~fID[?~ ~DfID@@ ~ hJU- Metro Development CorporatIon Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan, Inc '2 JOl...... UU!!l~ JOe . lM-tM O. MAPB II I I, I I '" I I I \ 1 , '. I I ............................. I . " , , !! .a " , ::l c:I I I I I I I I / .. ., ~" .J!" .. , - F -";~~( /%...;....~...J;:;:...-;....:......... ...________,,/ / , ......... ~ ....\j//~ /........../::/~'..... ~..-.. ./ }I/ :"~:'I:~/~""~"" / ,/ ,../ ..........------.......----....... "'/r .// ../' .......-:,-.)',,/1 / / /" /' .........~-----..... ~~t "':,::>;: -;:~.::"" / I / : : ........... II ". ...... ....-;:.._.... ",I I J I I r;1 ~.J' /"<./ __-- ..../ I I I .,Yt ....... ~/ /'" _~-,'" , I l ;)j ....;,./' ,/"'~ ...//;,/ / ~I /' ~....'" ~ ./ ~~ ---> / ----->/ p-! ~~ ............... J __.....--- ..- - -- /' ~_..J'/ 'O-~~~.!t J _r'-~---- _r"....~ / / /"----....--~--,,..,./ ,// / -~ ,-- I J I \ \ " I I I ~.,...--..,.,...-----.,.",......... \ ~ I_~. ", '__~'--~~_"__----------- _ r-- _ ~ _ ...__~----........... ,.................. .-----~--.............. '. ............ ....------- .. ".... 1 ~ __ .............-:",",.. .-1-.... ....--- ~--- ...~ '/,1 /';-;::;-':;::-::~~~-" J I ;' /..... ....... /'" ___ I I II 1/' ......;0... ",'" ....~-........ I j I / ; / ~ ,,/ ....~-~--- / I I / / / //"/"',. ...~_________ ,/ / / I , t { / "".r ....____-..______ I I ,I I I I 1 /... .......... ....----~---_ I I I I I I" F"'_-~ ~.... .... t , t I I t I /,------....__ ..... J I I / / / / / //( ........._ --- "\, \ i / / / ,/,/ //;'1 --") \ 1 l I I I t I / / III /~....."'" ~ I \ , / / / / / / / I;\ ,/I ...... ...... l I I I/'I ,I f ~ ................. r " ' ,} / / / ;/ / / \ \ 1 \ \ 1\ / ~ -... I 11//I//})1:/\. II '\ '\ _-- : /,' / / ,,/ // / / / / /' " / \ " I \.. , ..... 1,1 I / 1;'/ / / // ../'" /~/ ,,; /' ...../ / Il / : '\ \, ../ \ / / JI ... /"/ //./ ,,/ "." ,,/""../1,.,_"/ /.... /..' It I I \ \, // \ I / ~ I / / //./ / / / // /......./ ../ ../} f \ ... ,../1 ,~~ / ;/ /1,// I" /' / #''' // ,..../// /""" ...........-:._-0-1.---- ro---~... / / \ ..... ,,\.... /r ..................-" 1 / /1 ;' 1/ / /1 r/ /";, /' ?/,,/ ".... ........ .....~ ..............--...... ;',' .............. '.......... .............:_.................... \ 1 I J / / // /'" /' "... 1'// /1/ ......,,/ /"./; // / ....... .........______-..... : / ! I .../ /1./ / / ./ / /' / I / / / f /' / ............ ....~: / / " / // /; .../ // .../ // /~ / / f \ 1. l l " I / 1/ //.." / / /' // /.../ ".." /' .../ ./ / r ,\ \ ~........ \......... \.....------................. .....---- f/ ".... ",/ // /' ....../ ,,;" ...' ..../.../........ ~f J : } \1 \ I........ ...-...-_____~_____... ... ,.;;' // ",," ..../,.. / / /",,/ "...r,/ // J j ..... l 1 j........ ....................... ~/ ,// // //" ",,,' // ...//;'" ....,,/ / /",/',// // /1 / I l r J I .... -,...... ----_ I / / ... 1/ .... /' / / ... /',,/;" / / / I J J: l...............:....--................. -.....----_..... / I 1 ,,' " " /",/ / /.... ,."///.... / ~./ I I I j J I I \\.. ....-..._ ........... ...... , I / // .../ ./,//.. ... I / /' / / I I / j / J J ~... ......... I / / / // ,./"" // l/ // / /'" /1,// // ~/,.. / 1/ /! / / / ~ 'L\ '\....\ ~ J / / " / / / / / / I I / /'" ! I t / / / J \ \ \ \ I I / / / / / " j / / / / // ,/ / / / / / / :~ \ 1 I J j I I / / , / / / / / / / f / / / / / / , /1\ \ ,/ \ J j 'I J r 1 I I I. J J FIt / I I 1 ,r 1 \ \ ~///l}l;/f//r:! i / ///l{~//\\: \ i j I , I I I 1 r I j / I I I. / r r I , : ,/ \. \ j ........_ /I/ll! J Il': 11 ~ ! J lI\\1 , ,,/ / / / / / / : {! II rill l I.; ~ ; \ '~\.. \ ~ / I / J J I I r I , t. , I r, L \, \ I.. \,. \............ ",./ / ;' / / / : / f { j I ~ f 1 i \ \1Iio ~ ~ / ..../1./ J / / 1 / f : ~ \ l I I \\ ~=';"l"'-.I:IJ .. ...../ /r/ /f ,,/ / 1 / J l : \ \ : l f ...e..__..AACIICUI'1"a....1~ .....1" ./ / / } j I} J 1 L ~ I t ~.,....- ~ /-...... I ' \. ) " .................. " '\', , \ , I " I , , I J I I I J / ..- .- I; ";.....- (U' 10 Bei 'Ihl , ~{ ~-= I If TOPOGRAPHY I ~@[f[k ~~@@@ '~ I1JLj I Metro Development Corporation Pollt, Buckley, Schuh a. JernIgan, Inc '2 JO..V .M2 I I - - -...... MAPC ~- , '- ~ ~ "' , ~ .... , ~ "" '" ... .. 0 a:; Ii I '- -.. /' ~ - , , , I l -- I' I I, I , ~, "CUl~Y ALTERED " \74,1 , , , , , , \ \ ' , \ , , , ..............:-..-...~ " Drew SIr"l ~ .. , ...f J . ~ ~f .. , LEGEND I, 411 - NE 1'LATW0008 I 421 - XSCOM 422 - 0nER IWlDWOQD 641 - FIEllHWA1!R MAAllH I 741 - SCRAPED AREAS ... ~.. .r~ I " I ...... , , , , /~ / / / / '0 ~ 'I I ..... ...., I " , \ ............-....'\..... \ , r I J \, 1 : I I I I , I , , I "- , '~, -.. --- ~ (II ::I " d I .... I I ~ \ \ ~ \. \.. \ \ \ \...... \, \ ~ I EXISTING L;~~'~SE ~\ F-: VEGETATION ASSOCIATIONS \. I 11 I I [P@[J[k [PO@@@ ~ nJLj Metro Development Corporation Poet, Buckley, Schuh & Jerrugan,Jnc '1 ......V 1",2 I .IIOiI "'llO-tM...04I I MAPD&F II I I, I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I LEGEND Ad ADAMSVl..L.E FIE 8ANO As ASTAl\A..A FlHE SAND, MOD DEEP WATER TABlE F h FE1.l.0WSHf' LOAMY FIE SAND 1m IMMOKAlEE FINE SAND My MYAKKA ffiE SA/C) Or ORlANDO FINE SAtCl, WET VARIANT Pn PLACID FINE SAND We WAUCHI..Il.A FINE SAND " " , , , '\ \\ ........ \.. \ , , , ' \ ' ~ '" :> d , , , '- ..- ..- ~,- G1Bto ....., / SOIL ASSOCIATIONS ~@[j[k ~O@@@ Metro Development Corporation o._S ,/ ""'~~~!/ I -' " ., .' .r!J 1..../ ~ ' .' .' I ..- / / ......._~I.... /,....-............_~__......./ .;'1',-/ / ,,--_/ I , \ , , I , r I , , ,---,.--........ i'-...... . ' \ i ,~, I ~I .) .../.....~ " -~~ , ~---~~--=:im :- .............:....- .... __...-...::~~:,r "." -~ ",,' ",...--- ~--- //' ;-..."::--...-:",,,, .------- ~ / ;' ......... ~..." ".",,""" --- / ,', ....~~ /'''' --- { I I ;' ." ~F"" .........------ I / / / / /f __~____~~_ I I / I 1/ ...."'", ________~__ " / I I IF ,,/ ~:---~-----.._ / " / / / t ==--------__ J//'/';; _.... I I / 't' """\ / / / / { /j I \ I I 1 1//'1 1/ I I ////~\ /,,' ,/(~~\\ J / / )} : ) i , , / ; : I I ~- / - -----....- -, " \ I I I , , I I / / / , , I I , , I , , \ , . r I I I I I , ....~ ... '- "" \ ",,- \ '. " I I r I .' , , , , I / '" '- -.. ... .8.R l r ~ ru1..j Post, Buckley, Schuh" J8rr'1Igen, Inc ,~ ......~ 'H2 .ICliII .. .....:1'1&0II MAPE II I '" :;l d ~' ,....' ,. VER+roA~ STORAGE rr--/)".'f:'r:., ] (.......3 A~tFn.../ ........./ ~ j ,....----... , -' L /' to.... ! ~ / , I -,*, q" , ........... ,. t":~ ..... /// '" /.- / "'" / ../ ....i- .l...-oRIl!II..... / I / / iZ"'!..E-=-TfCA......IrtC!FtolClEt , \ / I ! UA A.c"U ......../ /" / I /)/ /~ /'/ /,/' ;,,/ / , J t I/'I I ~1~I\CIiII~8 / I' I / I , I ill VlRTICJIl. STORiu , , / Icu.eJ7U I , I ,/ / , I J I i J .--- / r J J r I li~ / /! r /, J -', , ,.... "....../ 1/ ......./ / /' .//..... / /...c ...c I I LEGEND I Ella DRY DETBmON AREA ~ WET DETENTION AREA ~ ~ PROPOSED SWALE J. r' \ \ / I r 1.1 vmncAl STOR AGE ( TI AolFU .."".. -, ..,.""". I. o:.\~I, ~ ~~ /--' '/ I ~ PROPOSED PIPE ......., DRAINAGE BASW BOlNlARY \ '- 2'.ACR~!I~ ~2 vRRT,CAl. 9TOR~B!_ ~- '4,~~~ll.~=:___ , ----::::::=::~:==~ " '- ..-- EXl8TlNO OUTFAlL .,,-~ , , r r'-"~- --~ I o MARSH ~ SAWORASS '.. '- " .... I ,,-, I tE~~~_ t.y... ...c', ," " ., ti. Ii i ., :r I '-. :" I '" I I I I .... ~ ~ I , , L I L , \ I L r I , P I I \ I , I I -,- GAllO s-i ' 8Ml 1 ~{ ~_: I l~r / I MASTER DRAINAGE PLAN I ~<ID[f[[ ~O<ID@@ ~ nJLJ Metro Development Corporation Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan, lnc .2.....Y 1..2 I '-#-.-00 I MAPG II I I 0.- SIrMI ~ ~ .... "'l...:-.!....,... " . ' . ~- A / I LAND USE DATA .........~~' / ........;../ ....--:;.....:/.../.... ~.. ~)/f I 0Fl'I(;I;: I RET AI. 108 10?.?oo " , ,\ /, '" ~" U 1)/ ~I" " ., ", - , / / ,/ F'.........: I I I' ... I I I J t / ~ ~ I r r I , I ... ,../ / ~ '<---:::~fEi' ,/ r-"/ /,!/.r' ~..../ _/' ~ .- ....---...to'1 A.CA!:II --- ---~ //...- .............. , , \ I I """or'" ..../ ......r' ,,,...-.-............. ___-",..' ,/",,/ ,/ -~ /--,~ '\~,,- ''1a _ 1211,"" LNrO USE ACRES DEN8lTY IoClAI8E OFFICE I RETAIL 21.8 lI8O.OOCl " -' , -' ...J , , I II l J\ l.J , , I' MIlRI8E OFFICE ll.1 21?.?oo " I ROAD RoO W 1.11 -~-........ .......-------- OFFICE PARI( 388 81lO.OOO" PARKS 6.0 ,,-- --..... ----~--........... " ~.. .r~ '- " , J , I I ~// ~ U~_.. J , , , J , r t I I I , I I I / I I I I I J I , I , J J j I I -.. TOTAL 89 1 t ,ll8O.ooo "" "" I HOJI!. TRACT DE__ ~RE 1lNO"" 1'01I_. I!' CI OIOI.V AC1I,W.. OEVEL_....V PIlOCUD"_ -. '" I .. I , " \, " /~ '5).....\, .... \ ./t' @ I \ \ . _,_1/ ~~lIA1!TAL \, \"'__1. r'...-........ .......p.JI... ..... ..........~---... :sr-~~ I " J I I J \,~ ' ~-. -.. '" :l " , J " I J I I I / / // ,/ ./ " /~" / 1// I / ,../ / .... " J './ /' ".... / .. / f~ ~...,~.... ...../. rt/ , I UU ac:::AIU I I I ( /'oo.poo /.. / / l ~ I ( / I / j ,~ , I J I : ! J : / I / I " II I J I l I I J r t J \ I I J / / r" I -'- --- I d t f::~~~--~--=~~--- /r /} r.........~~....- ...-,L:..... \\ ......, , I' \' ..... .......,jI Ij~'-~~' j 1"JIt"P'IWI:.'" ~ /. , , , I I &4AQm8 ,/ / I II ...,.001 *' /, I /l, ~ ,,~'~'frl / /1 '{,p,/ / l \ ,/'\/ , r X : 1/'\/ , "" '" ...- I .- I ~ "l}/ J I -- / J J ..../ I J / I J I -::'~' /1 illrC:RQI , ,-}" / / , \,.-<; X "- ~ \ \ ... ,,'. lo I QUI to Bar Blvd ~tlr- I II / I MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN I ~@[?[k ~D@@@ ~ rJLJ Metro Development Corporation Post. Buckley, Sehuh &. Jernigan, Inc. 11:......, 1"~ I -.--... I MAPH I I I I I I I I I I I I I ,I I I I I I ')'!..J..,.,.....~_.~ ~ ,'. . \ ~.---_' lr '( .1~~~~~~~:~~~'~~:;I~~' fa-A )-"" .....,"""'" , '\.~.r' ---~-{(- ~ ;:~.~ ~ ~ ~o" ~;:', '~- ')':" ~l~, .,....'*' '.) ~, - ~ _ ~~ . - ------ ~ -I \- .... k .: . ....i-".\I.':'.f,$T H \ ". , d..,,?~. M - ~>>--I>> ,'" . 0- _)0_ >> ,.~ _..-- v ._- A.c"on 1UY:a.'..T1......i..... ~~....&J~'" - I ..... .. ~ --I!!IIIJ.A-.. ~ IIA - ~ ~__... -- f::'\!l~.~~:~;t:yA:~1~(:...~:o:rl..Is.~ ;..-.--ll:~M Vu. _ ~^'? I _-~~~ ..._~ ....;,;... ~=__=- ::-,;1'\~\~U;I.~A~.~; '~"~~,f, ..-...;~' ,~~ '~~ ,",. ~. I~-J *',.... , v~- PI NEL:lA S CO"!,. - - · - -;.. J ' ,!,,~;,,"!tl "-~ , · '.:" , ~.t..^.~::'.'.;:- ~ IT I"'- ,,-- ~lP:!!)., ,,,cq '0'..' J . . Gr--... -_""" I~. 1~;.tl.'OflUTlOU,".~ "1'-"''':.;r- ~ )( \l.~:.m"-( \J~'''' ' ro:- - - -n"D"" ~..y<Ot' , t. < ~,;, :".,"o. '-~ ....,"10; 'Q\'l~ rr f.'&:; ~.&. '; """'5. - - - ......... -.. ~-r...-"" ... ~.. I? _.. ...1) 1 ~~)....?\ ... I Ii .,. l."':'f:Lll ~ \........F-\.. ::. -- ~ ~_ -':1 ~-C~ J-n _...J... - - "'",,,',"'''' ~", ~~ '\.'::",""" ~...o::- -,,,., eo.....~!~ - 'pc~" ~...,.",,~" - - ,----...: ...-"':.- ~<lU'-.1 =. ,... r' - ~ ..-......U ~......... ... "t._ l j-~~ -- t, I O~ - - , ... ~., -... "'~. !!..::. -~ '~.~~ ~...-;z;;. 'Ii t\ - , ~... '-, .". . '.... I '~J -- - , -,~ .~',' - ,.'.:', :~..;:~\;j ~.~ ;:{. ~.:~ 31' \1 "'l.~' ,,---...,.....-, """'" ~ .... _ ... .... ."...~().~ to _"'Ii. ~ ~ ,..~ ~.(. "t: 58:l..L ...... 1 - I" . - ,-1# ... ..~..:...... ",........~....., ::~_....t'".......~ ,.~~ ~--- i~ ~I .~ ~f.., - . .t....... ;...........I{.J...jo.",-- 0'" C"T('L'1 \... ~t ~ ." : ...:.,.;:~: "'.' '.. ,.....: I~; {,,;-t (l~"':'l.>-,~ '19\ __ ,--- I - =.J~l" - ,....-wIi!' : .:::.:. ':.~~ ~ ~',::, ~': ..~~f,~;,'().;~;~....1 TA~~) S;IHGS ~ I " I " '\ ,.- l "'/'~~'~'~. to-;w. ~~i . : ,: , . ':'. ' ~ . .' '1:'l'-:-'~: . ,'" ,\ - - '1 V~ ",",'" ! .: I " II....... .~_ ~ ~ ( !.5l _ , ..... ... I _.. .. I- ...~ ... ~ t, 7 I ~\iII I .... : .' ~-: ~_..: .::. ',':~' '.' '';;'_ ::..,..-,. " ~,;::;,-;~ 'I! j . jl , I \ 'h >' ~ I -~ - .:<~ ..;;~E.~<E~~;.;~<;;~~~~~~~ . f . \. 1 \' i · I~~~ " . MEDICAL SERVICE i" ~~~:lc= \ ~ .~' ~ ~~~~~~f :~',:.: II POLICE DEPT. ) "~% _ I __.:.. __-;,;~":: i " 11 ~"""" . ~ ,...~.,~.,,. ~ \:; .. " . ,.. '.!'b"T....-, ~ ~ r.. . J~ I 55 ~ I I- i -[ ',a::J::"" 101....\' j: ..~ ..:.... J "..t',;:- :t..{:i~"."~"""-:;,~,::..t."';u,,.. It'!- "'_ .r jIJ._, ~ I Z - L.. VT&j , '..'. r...~'~,...~""'-:"f"; .... .~,~!BI~C~' ;Y .. r-" .' ~ J.I .. ... 1 .. oV .'L-- -', ,'4"_ .-' ...'~ ,-",.-,..... <;;-.. _ 1< ~ I 19.......-. , , II - . .. fr.:..... ;~..+ Y3fl~~~ .~:i' a: ~I'",,~ \, ) I I ; : I I ~ "'It~~ . . '. . \"~:..',~!:,,,,,,,,"'-~.J-.~1!.'~ ~ ftr ,,., - /' - ,~_.,~ ~;.~--~~.~'4._,::.,."d ,~"= .,"'~;"~... I~ f ..J ~ ~ I c::, - ( "'I '.; ~'7'; ,,~~</;.-;:::J.:-;o~:::\';~.~.~t: ..,..", . ~'" ~ - ...-,. \ - I I kf . ':'.'j'" -'}~ ,...."twJ{~i '\... VI' ,~~.~~'I.::~..,:>tr. \ ~~.. e:. - '., J, I I Qt._ ) , . '''I::'-''~~ f~;;..'1<!~,~.'V'~j}.~'~~.':i;i\.~,..- , / 1\ i . . ' ~~- .. ~ 1'-..-:\, t ~~......~... .:-~~....?-O.. _ '-:t...=t ~i+-_ .. L I I J t I ,t""""", ~ -~..1.~ A \.~~':''),'''''''~\.7...........~ ..:........Jro.-~i1.~u.-- I .I - ;_ '~3::>~\'~ ~ ~'l>V1:. -;;~.} ~\~,"}:f: ,.'~9 A ~ -r--'\58t'" c" "~ f--1' ;! 'I "" ~- j -0/ ':"'" ,~~~~,,"'O:;"'~'/I'!,>,JS;~>!" '.,;0 I "- ; ;:J,.~ <- I i -.... -:e -"'/~~ ...,....,.i...~!;..~A........ -.... -- 0 &..... Ir.i I It.. II I 1~ rJ " -"'- <~, . ;'f~. ~,;'l"'..:r} ~::1' "" .' ' ~ ., I. #.. ' Ii' · .. ~^~j:r::~J~ .,~~~.. A ~3~~:../~~,~:"j:'P- " _..... 5, .:;..... "- II ( . i __ .~ ___ I _~ - : I - : ~'" ,'~ !J..~~:.~.!...)~ J" 586fr-.~ ;,;. ....... rr ~- \ '- i \. ,-- \ _ ,,-I ~n'... 1 - ..,. IN ~'j,j.rmil"""'" g.;..,,,, ,.._ JIIII.... I ~ (l Ul141 II ~'.ti1 .2~_. '- ' \ \ ~..~... I U"'i ~-..~J ~I~.J. } ... a;!"....!~_ .:)~r~t....--.; ... ....r~'"It.....~4'~ii .... --IIIi!!i:ii ~-~ 0- ... '... "i n Iit:I "----1 " - ., .' "'-""~~ --,,- -~.J.1.";'jrt,,,A ""AJ2: _ v. I ;\ ~\ ""'.: " .. '.. ""- --... o.:c .. . ~. .....'" . -. . 1 ---= ~ :,., ';'?-1f;~j!1 '';, D.., - r:::/.:" '~- ,DUNEDIN 'l ~.... _::tCi ,~ ~ \.. I f~ 58<1':: ,-, ' -:: _ ~ ': :. . :-':~#~'\ 1~~<.J::rl~~,w~,I8" - A'I]_ #f "~;:::." - I ~~ ~~' ~ ;:: l~/~ . ...} ?r l~~~J j , ~2-\-:';~-:"t"';;S' l' ') ->A. ~ en ,. ." ~ ~... .. ~-<,~. !~.. ...~;.- ~ '!I, '~l . . 2Il .. ... t ... ...~..J....1t., r.~ ..-....r1...:~ a -.". t - .. . .. l..... . OlOSMA~ .&.; ..u .. .. h .. ..~~ f.:-'r.'" ~""-;"'l4! -.. :r-. S:951 ' ;:: \ I ~ t....... .....'t"t,l'!......:~ '\0 1 !M~ '" ~1. ~ ."., ..'-. ::::'.'i~; .'::I!;}i,~t"iJ~;.r,~,~~ -~;._-......... I ;/l6 ~.""\~.~": :.,1.,;':"'::5 (t. ~.- t, ~~ . ,-. - fi:'l;~~' .:--~.&';t::r..~~.-(.t ~ d ~ '. :Lf'" L - -. II I , ,I n ,...-i ." ~ r 1.. ........:.. "EI:,.~t:'~.+:,,-; ~. " f'~ - ,ri . I ..:~, - ,& ....~C't~ L '(.~"1'k.::.....;C...;~.... . ~ ~ ~l" I .....rm~,.. ~ II, sa:J ql -:::::........L.L~ ,;~.-: .f!..I'~tt!~~~.: I ~ft ~~ & "u .j:" .;:);.. l.. 1..~ ~~.. ~,." (!..~ -.;:. ~j.~." : ~ w. ~..._ &u- ..I I ~ ~ ......L:::j~'I.. ~ (~~ r.. .I. .~" a. 510 , : _.'~'-~~''E' .'9~?~t~:~;",:;7~'J;?:' - ~ ,._~. ': ,j. ';~~~=?~' de :i>,~~~~,-:;r~ , #,,' i'-!::;" i"-'. :-::\'t. ',:1_ '-. ',1 ~, ~ .!-.~' ": 'Ii \ ."". ,f . (" - 1"~...t~ ."5--VI:e-. ~- J> ~ 01 il:!e..... '. '.'M" ,0-" '''-;'"..-~' ~' ,-, ~ .......... > ='''' ~-~"'- Ii')lli'~ll . ,,~Ie' '(~'''~V'''.<'!. ~...~ '.. _;" " I ' I. " ~" ",..... ,"_, c.:.(. ..C:..., ... ~ C.K.L ..""M; ,., f t ,,-' _t....~1 ....;..,.,... rl.! --:. j....; _; iitcd, I'''' ,...500 ../~~ I"l ~ ..;:, ..\lobbIrI"" ..... .....:-;:,....; r'\)... j 11IIOO:... ......z:.,. ~..O:~' ;;.J. . "" '....~'- ...: Ii; Cr .....t"... ._;:1 " ~--..,....;II~~ ....,j':L...'q.,..~~ .."'Ii........ .......z: ..-A ..:a.l. I lh!~"....u.,utJ I." t' -"~"""'-".t..::o,...N.. .c:~ 8;!1" ....~, ; , ..".~ "", '''". ~, ~ -- ....."'. - ,- - ~ ." . ~....;;..,I '~.~Y~':F-:;"'''::.~...~t:''...~) [~......"'>: 'Jt I' r",..-lf U. ~~+.;......."'':.t~'" ~ iII'.. ~ i..""-;..:....... .......~~.. - .'.hv.::...;-j J\:"'-o-:::t+:~~t.t.:.!.1-.::..;! ......~~'t, ~ ru~ .......1... t---- jU L~....I:.I'J>""..~ .:r ~. ...t";.~..~.~ .7.........' . : . ~..;'i\ (f~~.., 7-<.::'f:"'~~N ,., --'t.~58& ---I" .., -, jC ~8; '11SAFH'! 1-;A~'186il. - .~ ".'::.:~~.~.-. -;-:;',:':.';,' :.~,'. '.. ' _'l. ",-.. ";.....~-..'-r~_'. '_..... ~ _...,.~ '1 'D"'-.~' fl'"" ....., '00'", , .. .,", H:... ~'. ~. "',:: ~..~ J ~ 1- 1 _ ., 1IiJ"'''I!4.II.., ."'----!II """'I :::f!!J!JfrJ~- .......L-- ~--.. ~.. .....-.... .. t t . t.. ~t ~/' .. h.....ii "~~",.~I~:?"';'-' ~.. 1~~~1\.~""'i. I ).... ~ t ~ ,,- I 590J ~~-r.Jol.r. . 'Ii"~ l'''.'..#~:t~,~ #' '..t..- ~~t ':t -t-.*~~~" ....~"'..;~ . "",-,:Ote....it .. "'JJ'it~'r..,~..;.I'.; 4 590 A 1.MI -:: ,jll'" .. tlUII'WU,U_ ~;''''~I''''~:.''' ..f" ~,.., ~... ...~'" t.. '\.~~..,,; ~-,;~;,;:-J:it ". ;~1' '. - ~'-' .,' "~~,.I PROJECT SITE :\;~~I ',:~~:;'\"":J . ./,;....::'~"v-~ (' 6/)'iW "~~'''''-.....,....'-' - b....n~' · _~~ ' .. ~"':':':'~..-r~ . ~ ....:~\::1~~~~~~i'~ ,.~ - 6~ - - ~.. .. 590liiIf- ~ ~' . h' F.:'EC~.6~-:;;;~-;".-.:. " 'i'~ 60~1113~'\';,<~ .,'.- " ':J~~.tl' :~;::' i;;' ~~-.-' .1- \ LEA RWATER 0 ~'ld!lf~ ~L., ,~F=1.... ,.~~- '< -. . -~ i";',* '-" ?:.::": ".~~.'::'.. . ... .~tJ..:.i~.. -J".}~-..~..ft 60 "',f~..:.., ..;";~~,&t-J~t""""'''~-..,.J>'':''' ..-:;+ ... of ..~ r...... .."t...f. .,.,...... A - '.....B =- Ci j .... .. -r . I'" l ';l; ~ - .,~...... ~ .... ~..~ ..... ". ;I ~ ... :,.. ....; ~~... "... ,. 41 ......_-t~~.;I' ... ...I.....; 0.... 1.;;nJ;;iI _ ~.. ...... ~" 11:I..O. '\,... ~.'":.;,~..-....:...... 11";10" -.., ;.. ... ".."'....-... ...:.. .. :.c.1...-, ..~.. 41~1" ::.... t: i J~ l - --, '1III1""O:-~U: t"'l ........ ......"I-~ J.......~ j'" .:'" ;" ... ~~...~t.. ........ ... ;;, .oi::;; ..,!~... .Ll~ 1'"11.... ,-=...... ~ ~ rTi: N" !.. '...;.... ~ '(: I _ ,,""1 .....:.f... L t....~ . _...~:, -~ ..';t.,~1 :0"..,,1'''.~ il~\ :""''j ~~ '.Wl! J$" I ~': 0" .' " - " . ,'~~i ::r~" .. ~, ,~ t~~"'::~~"'~'/"L:,,=:-~"1;f!:~+'~~' i: :... 1.., .. of'.#-J ..~...... ',,t... I'" ~:/~ ~ 1':..:.. ~ ~J ";,~" ..:;....... -- ,..~ {,) .,~;;;~ ~i! -' W~>~ ,,tl. .....t-" .., ';~. -' ':..., "'::' .-;:.,. ~"M.:...' " ,;::-~",f~~ ..':,/.~,-~ ~t toll ..- .-..I,.~" ".:''1'" ''''~ ~ ....I" /: 1 ..l::~ J ~.......'-O~,-~. ~~_.:~.: ~<~+"'~q:~..\...3 ~"'~ t ~J I I ~~! ~~~. .. .:~.~'.....~..."";~l:; ~:. ~... ~I~"~ .. ... ~ "~.,"..I+} .. j;-..UIy ,'".,,,,,,, ~.-.-:.. - ~~, ,'~~ MtLlEA IR""'".b. lS95A '.. "_ j~' \~: k 1 ;....I' ',- -r". ~'-h '# , . _ (" '-::' .: ....' - ' 7")-0- lLEAI ~-:'it.,;~.,.."...~...p 't--'l'~ "'t ~ :.....,.. _~~ ~ ~I .......Jt"\ ...."'.. "...... "';,.r ,..'1:...... I ,......... -. 'lip t .Ai-,~l~ -;.....:. "'~- EACH f~."~.i;;^-~. .~ ~'.<4011V. :;~~'" "",,:;... I~', - . ..!.~" '..~ I ..~..-," _..:..~..';:. - PUBLIC FACiliTIES & SERVICES MAP I I' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 12 GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION A REFERRING TO MAP H, DESCRIBE AND DISCUSS IN GENERAL TERMS ALL MAJOR ELEMENTS OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IN ITS COMPLETED FORM. INCLUDE IN THIS DISCUSSION THE PROPOSED PHASES (OR STAGES) OF DEVELOPMENT, MAGNITUDE IN THE APPROPRIATE UNITS FROM CHAPTER 22F-2, F A.C., AND EXPECTED BEGINNING AND COMPLETION DATES FOR CONSTRUCTION. FOR NON- RESIDENTIAL DRIIS ALSO INCLUDE TARGET DATES FOR FACILITY OPERATION OR UTILIZATION IF THE DEVELOPMENT WILL HAVE A PROPOSED BUILDOUT OF 10 YEARS OR LESS. PHASING SHOULD BE SHOWN ON AN ANNUAL OR BI-ANNUAL BASIS. IF THE PROPOSED BUILDOUT IS GREATER THAN 10 YEARS, PHASING SHOULD BE SHOWN AS APPROPRIATE. Park Place is a planned retail and office complex. Under the defini- t ions prov i ded in Flori da Admi n i st rat i ve Code, Chapter 22F- 2, the project is a shoppi ng center/office park DR!. The Master Concept Plan (Map H) indicates a maximum of 1,960,000 square feet of retail and office space within a 99 acre site. The Master Concept Plan provides for development to begin in the south central tracts, and progress outward durlng the buildout peri ad. A vari ety of bui 1 di ng types wi 11 be constructed. rangi ng from two story offi ce park type structures to ten story mi d- ri se. The overall planning concept emphasizes extensively landscaped open areas with an attractive pedestrian focus provlded by urban plazas and internal pathway systems. Retail Development Retail space will be located along side office space within tracts in the southern half of the project site. I n some cas es , reta i1 space may be i ncl uded wi thl n offi ce bui 1 di ngs. The total square footage of retail space wi thi n Park Pl ace is 460,000 square feet. Retail space will generally be designed to meet the objectives of maximizing on-site sales opportunities and providing an attractive 12-1 METROl:V 590-298.06 II I I I I I I I I I I I I ,I I I I I I retail atmosphere. Speclalty retail tenants will be emphasized, as opposed to major retail anchors and large chain stores. Further descrlption of the retail portlon of the project can be found under Section 20; Economics. Office Development There are two types of office space proposed for the project. In the northern half of the project site, the planning concept is to construct two and three story office park-type buildings. In the central portion of the site, mid-rise office buildings are proposed ranging from six to ten stories in height. Along the southern port i on of the project site, the mi d-ri se offi ce and/or retail buildings are again proposed, in transition from existlng development along Route 60. A total of 1,500,000 square feet of office space is proposed. Phasing Plan The proposed phasing of Park Place is shown in Table 12-1. Develop- ment is scheduled to begin in 1983 and to be completed in 1991. B. PROVIDE A BREAKDOWN OF THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED LAND USES ON THE SITE FOR EACH PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT THROUGH COMPLETION OF THE PRO- JECT. USE LEVEL II OF THE FLORIDA LAND USE AND COVER CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM: A TECHNICAL REPORT, AVAILABLE FROM EACH REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL. REFER TO MAPS 0 (EXISTING LAND USE) AND H (MASTER PLAN). USE THE FORMAT BELOW AND TREAT EACH LAND USE CATEGORY AS MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE. (1) THIS QUESTION SHOULD BE ANSWERED FOR EACH LAND USE/COVER CATE- GORY, LEVEL III, AS INDICATED ON MAPS 0, F, & H. A breakdown of existing and future land uses is provided in Table 12-2. Also see Maps 0 and F. and Map H; which show existing land uses and the Master Development Plan, respectively. 12-2 METR01:V 590-298.06 I' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I PHASE RETAIL Sq, Ft. I II III 100,000 160,000 200,000 TABLE 12-1 DEVELOPMENT PHASING PLAN OFFICE Sq, Ft. TOTAL Sq. Ft. Ac, COMPLETION Year 435,000 545,000 520,000 535,000 705,000 720,000 23.8 30.1 30.3 1985 1988 1991 TOTAL 460,000 84,2* 1,500,000 1,960,000 * does not include 5.0 acre park and 9.9 acres road right-of-way METR01:AA 12-3 590-298.06 I' I TABLE 12-2 I EXISTING AND PROPOSED LAND USES I LAND USES CLASS EXISTING PROPOSED I Acres Percent Acres Percent lOO-URBAN OR BUILT UP I l2l-Retail Sales & Service 0.0 0.0 13.7 14 I l24-0fflces & Professional Services 0.0 0.0 65.1 66 I 144-Major Roads & Highways 0.0 0.0 9.9 10 I 173-Parks 0.0 0.0 5.0 5 400-FORESTED UPLANDS I 41l-Plne Flatwoods 52.5 52.9 42l-Xeric Oak 6.3 6.4 I 422-0ther Hardwood 35.5 35.8 I SOD-WATER 561-Ponds 0.0 0.0 4,2 4 I 600-WETLANDS 641-Freshwater Marsh 2.6 2.7 1.2 1 I 700-BARREN LANDS I 74l-Scraped Areas 2.2 2.2 I TOTAL 99.1 100.0 99.1 100 I I 12-4 I METR01:BB 590-298.06 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I C. PROVIDE A GENERAL DISCUSSION OF THE SITE PLANNING APPROACH TO BE UTILIZED FOR THIS PROJECT. INCLUDE AS PART OF THE DISCUSSION CONSI- DERATIONS OF UNIQUE TOPOGRAPHICAL AND OTHER FEATURES INVOLVED IN THE SITE PLANNING PROCESS. Through its variety of vegetation and rolling topography, the Park Pl ace site offers numerous opportuni ties to deve lop a uni que and pleasing project. The major vegetation systems on site include large areas of pine flatwoods, oak hammock and a small freshwater marsh. To incorporate the type of intense urban development proposed for Park Place into the existing site character, a number of objec- tives will be considered. Wherever possible, areas of distinct topography and desirable native vegetation will be preserved, The basic character of the development will be accentuated through the use of landscaped buffer areas which will soften the intensity of the land use while providing a comprehensive open space system. A principal internal roadway system will be designed as a parkway, with landscaped medians where acceptable to the City, and a buffer along each side to accommodate landscaped berms with varying topogra- phy. The roadway system for the project will be designed to empha- size internal access to the various tracts in the project, In addi- tion, the provision of efficient and easily accessible pedestrian and bicycle pathways will encourage these uses as opposed to internal automobile traffic. A six foot wide pathway will wind through the buffer area, shaded by trees to encourage pedestrian use, For further discussion of the open space concepts planned for the project site see Question 27: Recreation. 12-5 METR01:V 590-298.06 II I I I I I. I I I I I I I I I I I I I The stormwater management system proposed for the project wi 11 emphasize cascaded water quality and quantity management technlques. These will i ncl ude co 11 ect i on from the i mpervi ous surfaces. routing through swales and open spaces to dry detention areas. Wl th over- flow to wet detention areas also located wi thi n open space and greenbelts. Further description of the stormwater management system proposed for the site can be found under Question 22: Drainage. The project location, being central to retail and office markets in Pinellas County and in Western Hillsborough County, is complemented by present urban development surrounding the project site. The ultimate expression of the planning concept described herein will establish a homogeneous image for the entire park in order that Park Place express a distinct identity of the highest quality and stand- ards. second to none in the Greater Tampa Bay area. 12-6 METROl:V 590-298.06 I' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 13, ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES: AIR A. ESTIMATE AVERAGE OAI L Y EMISSIONS IN POUNDS PER DAY BY TYPE AND SOURCE. The only maJor source of air pollutants associated with the project wi 11 be from vehi cul ar traff1 c. Estimated vehi cul ar em1 ss 1 ons are shown by phase 1n Table 13-1. B. WILL A COMPLEX SOURCE PERMIT BE REQUIRED PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 17-2.04, RULES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION? IF AN APPLICA- TION FOR THIS PERMIT HAS BEEN PREPARED, IT MAY BE SUBSTITUTED FOR THE APPROPRIATE PORTIONS OF THIS SECTION. A complex source permit will not be required for the proJect C. WHAT STEPS WILL BE TAKEN TO REDUCE EMISSIONS AND TO MINIMIZE ADVERSE EFFECTS? On-site emissions can be reduced by providing an efficient site ac- cess and parki ng des i gn. Pollutants per vehi cl e wi 11 continue to decline as older veh1c1es are retired and newer vehicles meet more stringent standards under the Federal Motor Vehicle Control Program. The overall concentration of air pollutants can be further reduced by staggered work hours and by transit alternatives such as car pool- ing and bus service to the project. The provision of pedestrian and bicycle pathways will also assist in reducing 1nternal automobile use. Fi na 11 y . the computer cont ro 11 ed signal i zat i on of key i nter- sections will promote efficient traffic flow and further assist 1n reduc i ng overall concentrations of air poll utants in the p roj ect area. 13-1 METR01,W 590-298.06 - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I L TABLE 13-1 CUMULATIVE DAILY EMISSIONS (lbs/day) HYDROCARBONS NOX CO Retail 96,2 170.1 1006.0 Office 239,0 422 9 2500 6 - - Total 335.2 593.0 3506.6 Retail 168.0 379.5 2064.2 Office 361. 8 817.4 4446.0 - Total 529.8 1196.9 6510.2 Retall 226.8 490.0 2926.2 Office 422.7 913.0 5452,4 Total 649.5 1403.0 8378.6 PHASE II. III. SOURCE: Post, Buckley. Schuh & Jernigan, Inc. Emissions Factors are from Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors: Highway Mobile Sources EPA 460/3-81-005. March 1981. Average trip length is 5,8 miles for retail and 10.4 miles for office trips Average network speed is 35 mph. Operating mode combinations are: 20.6% cold start, non-catalyst; 27.3% hot start, catalyst; 20.6% cold start, catalyst. 13-2 METR01:CC 590-298.03 II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I QUESTION 14. ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES: LAND A. PROVIDE A DESCRIPTION OF EACH OF THE SOILS INDICATED ON MAP E UTILI- ZING THE FOLLOWING FORMAT: TAMPA BAY REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION A(l) EXPAND THE SOIL DESCRIPTION AND INTERPRETATION TABLE TO INCLUDE THE DEGREE AND KIND OF SOIL LIMITATIONS FOR ALL PROPOSED USES. REFER TO THE FLORIDA GENERAL SOILS ATLAS FOR REGIONAL PLANNING DESTRICTS VII AND VIII. The two maj or s ha 11 ow sub-surface geo 1 ogi c formations in P 1 ne 11 as County are the Hawthorne Formation and the Caloosahatchee Marl Form- ation. The project site is in that portion of the County underlain by the Caloosahatchee Marl, consisting of sand, clay, and marl of mari ne ori gi n. Ouri ng the Pl ei stocene, both Hawthorne and Caloosahatchee formations were covered by additional marine deposits forming four terraces. The project site is located in an area of transition between the Talbot and Penholoway Terraces. Both terraces tend to exhibit Astatula and Myakka soil associations, which are the predominant soils on the project site. Exhibit 14-1 (Map E) shows the soil types found on the project site as identified in the Soil Survey Report for Pinellas County, United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservatlon Service (1982). Two major soi 1 assoc 1 at ions are found on the proj ect 5 i te. The Astatula-Adamsville association is comprised of nearly level and gen- tly sloping deep sandy soils on broad low ridges. This association is found in the southwestern portion of the slte. The Myakka- Immokalee-Pome11o association is found on the eastern part of the project site, and is comprised of nearly level and gently sloping, 14-1 METROl:C 590-298.06 (I I I I I I I poor 1 Y drained and moderate 1 y well dra 1 ned sandy so i 1 s that have layers of weakly cemented organic matter at depths of 40" or less. Descriptions of the indivldual soil types as determined by the Pine'las County Soil Conservation SerVlce are provided in Table 14-1. B. WHERE THE DEGREE OF LIMITATIONS IS VERY SEVERE, SEVERE, OR MODERATE FOR A PARTICULAR SOIL, DISCUSS HOW EACH OF THESE LIMITATIONS WILL BE OVERCOME AND WHAT SITE ALTERATIONS WILL BE NECESSARY BOTH FOR THE PRESENT DEVELOPER AND ANY SUBSEQUENT DEVELOPERS OR OWNERS. I The primary 1 imltations for building construction are related to I I I I I' I I I I I I wetness and high water tables. The limitations for pond embankments, reservoirs, and roads and paved areas are also related primarily to wetness and high water tables, A secondary limitation involves the clay content of certaln soils on the site which may result in local- ized shrink/swell potentials which are excessive for building foun- dations or pond embankments. Additional soils tests were performed on-site by Williams and Associ ates, Inc. in November and December of 1981. Our; ng these invest i gat ions 23 so i 1 bori "gs were made in a gri d pat tern and 7 penetrat 1 on tests were conducted for assess i ng bu 11 ding foundation support. The results of these tests indicate that the water table on site in November of 1981 ranged from 9 feet below the surface on the ridge within the Astatula and Myakka soils types, to 3,4 feet 14-2 METR01:C 590-298.06 :1 I I I, I' I I ,I I I, I I I I' I I I I, I ... , ... ... ... -' '" c ~ o %% -0 ""- '" ~O'" c<t::z::- %1-00 <.-Q..> "" '" l..I.J_o::w ;uJ_oi.l'll '" "-W "'''- '" wO o o %ZO -CZI;/'l! :IIC_CC ..... W C<I,/)Ct:: :;r::.....o< c-c :1:00 L.I...I_a::w W...I > '" "'c t.::I.....o"- WO"- o o zz -0 '" :.l:_OI'- .....z=: CCOL.I.J ;!i="'~ :r""z l..Lt-o< 2:t-'u..!E ",u.. W "'0 o '" '" s ~ ..: ..... ... '" c.. '" ... ..... z <:> zz -0 ""- '" .....3<<.::1 ccoz: .z 'I- -I """"' <- "" :1:"'...1 """'-0- w.....l~.:. '" "" <.::1"- WO o <:: z ..: '" z S ..... ::. '" u '" ... o -' ;; '" z ~ 0 ""...... -...1>- ~"'..: <a: ....l.....::> c 0 ='" 0"" "'..... c.c,: w3l..... '" c.. w o . '" 01 e> .... '" 01 ... " '" '" '" '" "' '" ... "' '" "' .... '" '" <::: "... '" '" "" ]; "' ... <::: .. "' .0" "" '" " <::: ..... .~ '" .. .. .. " " '" .. "'... 01 .. '" .. .. .. '" '" <::: ".. '" '" li: ]; o N , o .... .. '" E .... , '" N", ...~ , 1.1 ... <::: N~ z S ..... ... '" U '" ... o ... '" -..'" ...... "'....c: "'-... e.... .. ..,,'" ..O..c: ~_ e> ]; - .. -~ e'" OI!C/+J-'" iIlIClQlI..c:: "",e> ....0""- ::I _ 0 GilC:-N_ "0 .. '" c: _ ..",...,iI ".<:::<::: >. QlI"" Ql' -<::: 1.1 '-_ 'IJl ~ ilDltIIl;P'.I"""":I G,II....Gl'1:ll Z"C_", ~ w ~ Z ... o VI .. -.., <::: .. " .. "' " .. " <::: ,,- <..... - '" .. '" .. " '" 0. " '" '" '" '" '" ... ~ !f ::;; .. ... <::: .. .0 .. " 1.1 "' .. .. '" " ,. .. .. '" ... ... ..c: e> '" o '" '" " " " <::: ... <::: " 1.1 .. 01 .<::: , ... "'<::: ...- o ... '" _0 .... .. 010 <::: .", ,,- "'- <::: 0 ...", .. ..e. "01" '" 0.. "'... 0 - ..- .. '" ,. Q -..... .. <::: ..-.. "' ",1.1 1.1 ,. .. ".. .. ...... '" .... .. <::: -.. " .. .. .. 01 "" <::: ..- <'" ..c: '" .. ..c:::_ .0 . ... "''''... .. '" .... .. ,. e... "'..... "'.... .. ]; ~ '" ..c: .. '.0 '" .. ...... .. .. .. .. .. "... o .. "" ]; .. .0 .. .. .. "' <::: '" " C. Q .... .... 01 '" ".... ..~ '" .. ~ "'.. ~:o .. -.. 01 .. .... '" 01 ".. '" .. "''' '-'0 - "'.... .... , + t"Jo II,CI:- ,"'0 0'-'''' ....."'..... 0....0 N , N , '" , "'........ ....0.... <::: '" ..c::: ... .. .. 0 .. Ii 01 _N .. '" ~ , <J 0<::: ...- .., 01 <::: C QJI If.I, S- .. <:::.. ~ :): - 0"" L..~"""""oi-I' "Ct,IIi'!I:I~G.l ..Q E! rG.c >, "',. - iI,IlI w.c:: .........:::-..,11 Q""-Gl_ Q- ]; g,,-- "'" ~ .. .. <::: "'''''C :::J:.c Q ~ - 1'1:I U cn-- II&IICu-.....- _i:;~ OJ::.:! ~ .... 1.1 I:III1IICIO"C :>to o.c "".;;J - Cl t,f) 'IA i:: 1..- ~ l"CI fIII_ ./tI-QG,t I!a QJ 0 - L C '- ZU'IIII.IIIU_-= .." "' <::: -.. .. '" ... 0'" ~.: -.... -.. '" '" .. .. '" e. " .. '" .. '" '" .. .. .. <::: .. .. ]; .. .... .. " 01 '" .. '" ..'" e._ "'- '" III '" .. .. '" .. .. .. "'.... ,. 0 .. .... "'.. '" .. .. <::: .. .. ]; .. .. .. ,. .. '" o Cl '" .;. .... .. o e '" .. , .. N..c::: ....1.1 , <::: 0- ... ..... "0"' <::: e. "' .. 0 ,,"'- ..~ .. 1.1 ... <:::... >,- <::: - 01 ...01.1 01.... .. .. III ];<:::e. -. '" ,,"" 0>_ 0 <:::];'" ~.:;=- .. 0 "... . .. "'....1.1 _0.. ....~..... o .... O:Z: " ..."'.. .. <::: ;: .. ... ....... .. <::: l':l: >- .....- l:- C./tl 0... _ rtI L..,l 01.'<::: <::: -1'1:I iIh Q,I ..... ... .. ~ 0 GlIC'lOc.. ,,<:::- 41......c:_ "'.. - .." '" .. <::: " .0,,'" ..... .. ~ . - ~GJ..lII::...,lI <::: <::: ..e...e- aJ ...... ..+I'.c (;1 .. '" e. .. .... CIliG:l.c_ :>..., 0._ G,II ~- Q,I VI];..<:::]; "' ..... .. ,c :; CliQJo4111: !:: -_C:QJ1 -,=.o-,..Jo .. .... 0 ...~.c c:L .. .. .... .... -a.,IG,I.z;,.... > _ t:I') d.I Q,I tEII_): V'l-::J;.c"'" ...... .. ..c: . _ CHII..w: ..., <::: <::: .J: .c..,.. t.l ....... .....,.J: 0 "' "'e. .... .... ClJlGiI~_ :>..,JII:'I'_ Q,II ~_ CJ 1.I'!I!J:.~ ..... .-.;,., - '" .... , ........ .. ,...... 0....... '-'0- 0'" ""' + ~-;. NOCC " ..... ""'l.Ql,g1 loDOQ1"'1i '" 0.00...... .. o IE! .... .. '" ..c , 1.1 0<::: ...- ".. ",,,, c <::: .. .. .. .... ...... "'.. >,e.<::: _0.. ...._1.1 <> "'.... o .. e..e. .- '" "'0 <:::'" <> - ... .. .. '" """ -<::: "''' Ii ...._0 <::: e. .. =-"'''' e... -<::: .- ....... ~ >, Ii" -.. '" .. 0.. "-...'" , C- O> , '" "'c:::" '" :::r _ .. ." Q,.I:C: aJ'II< '-' 1I'EIo_ G.I '" .0 e. > OJ ,., 0 Iil 0...,11- V') ~ L.n IIn ..c: "'.. ~~ 'II ..- '" .. .... '" <II ,... '" .. "']; ..c: "'.. ~:;; .. ..... .. .. .. 01 01 "... .. .. '" :0 ..c: "'''' 'f:;;; .. .... .. .... .. 01 01 >... .. .. '" " "" N <::: .. ..c .. .. 01 ... 'II 0> .. r=> .. CO E '" .. .. ..c: U <::: ..<:::- '" .. ..~o .......... ~ .... '" "....'" 00 -G.l ~ c..Oo.~ " " .. ~.,lo-v It! ftII..n!L. ..c:::_ .. );tt- "'0.. III .. Si-Wc.t) o .. '" 1n-4,II"'gO <:::-... .. '" ..- .. ~S:~8 .. .. "'_0- "'Ole. ,- c: ~ OJ .. - '" ." C1"'O I: cD i.-':;.. Z"T:I"'" .. <::: " .. c- 0.. .... ,,"'.. c > .. '" -<:::.. ....- .. 0"-]; , e. .. '" .. ....c:::'" "'.. ._"" ..~ .... .. .. . '" " Ill.... .. "'.. '" "']; ..c::: "'.. ..c:.o '" '" .... <::: .. - ...." .. III Q >... 0 .."'- "'"... ,c "'''' ~'" .. Ol -... <::: .. ...... '" 01 '" 0 ""'0 ....- "'"... ..c: "'.. ~.o ..'" ..... c '" ......" .. .. " ".... Q "''''- "'];0- o N , .... '" .. o e '" '" .. .<::: <J J: "'<:::- '" .. ...J:O ... .. .... "'- .... Q "", o .. e.- <::: '" .. >,<:::u .. 0 .... "'- III ""<0. .. ... N - .... .. e. Q >..... ...... ....Cl >'''''' -<:::Ill .. - e. .. .. Q ......- :,,'" .... c .. ....'" 1.1 '" .. <::: a..,,- I C. '" .. '" ....c:::.,o .~~ "'~ .. .. '" .", ,. Ill.... '" "'.. "'.. " ~ "'01 - - ..c:.o .. '" .... <::: '" - '- .." .. .. " "... 0 .... - "''''... ,c "'''' ~.,o .. '" ... <::: .. ........" 01 .. CO " .. Q "'..- ",];... ..c: "'.. :c::c .. '" ... <::: '" '- ...... '" .. 0 ""'0 ",..- "'];..... .... .... ~;"""o "''''''' , .... , 0'''' ............ "'..... ...... .. Cl 0"" ., '" .... , .. , '" 00.... """'0 '" .. o e '" .. 01 ..c: 1.1 <::: ..<:::- .. .. ",,cCl ...I..... " ~'" .... 0'" 0"" e.<><::: <> III "']; ... .... .. "'.. '" ,. - e. .... '" -.. .. <::: 0 ,,-... 01'" _ 0 " "'",'" c '" .. _ e. .. .. 0 Ill"_ z....'" ... .. <::: - .. :::r", ..c::: <J "' " <::: ..- 3<"- I' I I il I, I' I \1' I I 'I I I ,I, I, I' I I, I METROl:C below the ground surface in the Myakka soils adjacent to the Placld fine sand (the marsh area), The water table throughout the slte averaged 5 feet or more be low the ground surface. These res u 1 ts 1 nd i cate that high water tab 1 e co ndi t ions on the site have been affected by surroundi n9 drai nage improvements. to the extent that limitations due to high water table are not as severe as the soils types descri pt ions i ndi cate. Accordl n9 to the Wi 11 i ams report, soil s on-si te are favorable for shallow foundation supports for either 1 i ght commerci a 1 or mi d- ri se condomi ni urn structu res. However, clay soils wlth signiflcant potential for post-construction movement due to shri nkage and swe 11 i ng were found to be randomly located on the site. At one 1 ocat ion clay so i 1 s were found at depths as shallow as 5 feet. however, most often these clay so i 1 s were located at depths of 8 to 15 feet. As the clay layers are reportedly randomly scattered throughout the general area, they can be best dealt with through building-specific removal during foundation excavation, followed by replacement with compacted clean fi 11. Corrective measures for limitations with respect to roads and pave- ment areas may include removal and replacement of clay sailor sub- so il Wl th more su i tab 1 e materi a 1, fi 11 i ng to proper grade, and compaction. Limitations with respect to pond embankments and reservoirs will primarlly be overcome through design and construction of shallow side slopes for detention areas in order to help increase stability, and in placement of sod or other stabilizers on the side slopes as soon as possible after constructlon. 14-4 590-298.06 ,II ,I I I I' I I ,I I I, I I I I I I I' , i I I C. IS THE DEVELOPMENT LOCATED IN AN AREA OF KNOWN MINERAL DEPOSITS? IF SO, SPECIFY, WILL EXTRACTION OF ANY MINERAL RESOURCES OCCUR ON-SITE EVEN THOUGH ANCILLARY TO OPERATION OF THE PROJECT? There are no mi nera 1 depos i ts 0 r mi nera 1 resources on- s ite wi th potential for commercial exploitation. Mineral extraction is not planned in any case. D. WHAT STEPS WILL BE TAKEN DURING CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE AT FULL DEVELOPMENT TO PREVENT OR CONTROL WIND AND WATER SOIL EROSION? INCLUDE A DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PLANS FOR CLEARING AND GRADING AS RELATED TO EROSION CONTROL. Wind and water erosion will be controlled by phasing site development so that large areas are not left exposed for a long periods of time, by holding grading to a minimum and retaining existing vegetation to the the extent possible, by protecting cleared areas through seeding, mulching and/or installing sod as soon as possible after construc- t;on, and by providing for safe disposal of runoff through the storm water management system. E. DESCRIBE ANY UNIQUE GEOLOGIC FEATURES ON THE SITE, AND DISCUSS WHAT ASPECTS OF THE SITE PLAN WILL BE USED TO COMPENSATE FOR OR TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THEM. The site does not have unique geologic features 14-5 METR01:C 590-298.06 III I I I II I' t II J I I' I' , I a 1\ I I I QUESTION 15. ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES: WATER A. DESCRIBE THE EXISTING HYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS (GROUND AND SURFACE WATER) ON AND ABUTTING THE SITE, INCLUDING IDENTIFICATION AND DISCUSSION OF ANY POTENTIAL AQUIFER RECHARGE AREAS. GROUNDWATER The Caloosahatchee Marl Formation described under Question 14, Land, is underl ai n by a hard 1 imestone 1 ayer known as the Tampa formation. This formation, at one time, provided nearly all of the water used for both irrigation and potable use in Pinellas County, and is the uppermost waterbearlng unlt of the Floridan Aquifer. The Tampa Formation is approximately 40 to 50 feet below the ground surface in the viClnity of the pro- ject site. According to U.S. Geologlcal Survey information (Report of Investigations No. 12, Groundwater Resources of Pinellas County, Florida, 1954) the surficial aquifer (Shallow water table) in the vicinity of the project site is not a useful source of potabl e water. Thi s is primarily due to the fre- quency with which clay layers occur in the Caloosahatchee Marl Formati on. These cl ay 1 ayers serve as a semi cont 1 nuous con- fi ni ng 1 ayer for the Flori dan Aqui fer; however, they also serve to 1 imit the water bearing capacity of the shallow sediments which cover the limestone formations. 15-1 METROl:D 590-298.06 'I I I I I, I 'I 'I 'I I, I I I I I I I I I, The USGS survey study ci ted above i ndi cates that the area surroundi ng Coachman was, in the early 1950 IS, cons i dered to be a point of recharge to the Floridan Aquifer. Coachman is located north and west of the project site, and the site does not appear to be included within the potential recharge area defined by USGS, The site will have limited recharge poten- tial due to intermittent subsurface clay layers; however, recharge can be facilitated by careful location of detention areas within the project, Based on potentiometric surface graphics prepared by USGS, and on topographic maps, the direction of groundwater flow on the project site is from west to east. The potentiometric surface falls rapidly as the western shore of Tampa Bay is approached, due to discharge from the aquifer into the Bay. SURFACE WATER There are no permanent surface water bodies on the site. One intermittent water body, in the form of a shallow freshwater marsh, is located along the eastern border of the property. This shallow wetland is dry during some portions of the year, and is refilled with localized surface water runoff and shallow aquifer groundwater during the wet season. 15-2 METR01:D 590-298.06 , II I I I, 'I I I I, I I I, I I I I I I I : The project site 1 i es part i ally wi thl n the All i gator Creek drainage basin. Alligator Creek dralns a nine square mile basin in a portlon of the City and the County to the north of the project site, eventually discharging to Alligator Lake and thence to Tampa Bay. The southern ha1f of the project site drains to the south through the Bayview Area and thence to Tampa Bay. B. DESCRIBE IN TERMS OF APPROPRIATE WATER QUALITY PARAMETERS THE EXISTING GROUND AND SURFACE WATER QUALITY CONDITIONS ON AND ABUTTING THE SITE WHICH WILL BE INFLUENCED BY THIS DEVELOPMENT. GROUNDWATER The s urfi cia 1 aqui fer is in i ntermi ttent contact wi th the Floridan Aquifer in the project vicinlty, due to discontinuous clay confi ni ng 1 ayers. The Flori dan Aqu i fer has undergone gradual degradation in some areas of Pinellas County due to i nt rus i on of sa 1 i ne waters fall owi ng pumpi ng in excess of recharge over a long period of time. The first reports of salt water intrusion into municipal well fields occurred in St. Petersburg in the 1920.5 and 301s. In 1950, a well pene- trat i ng the Flori dan Aqu i fer a short di stance north of the project site was reported to discharge water containing more than 500 parts per million chloride. Since this time, the quality of waters available from the Florldan Aquifer has remained approximately constant in some areas, and has contin- ued to slowly deteriorate in others. 15-3 METR01:D 590-298.06 II II, I I' I I, I I' 'I 'I II I, I I I I ,I, I I The City of Clearwater has two deep water supply wells tapping the Floridan Aquifer adjacent to the northwest property bound- ary. Both have been in operation for 20 years or more, and both provide good quality water to the 5 million gallon storage tank adjacent to the project site. At present the City obtains approximately 7 million gallons per day from various wells scattered throughout the City, and purchases additional supplies from Pinellas County. It is unlikely that project development will have any effect on wells tapping the Floridan Aquifer. due to the depth of those wells, and the subsurface confining layers. The project does not propose to develop wells in the Floridan Aquifer. In response to the deteriorating potable supply potent1al of the Floridan Aquifer in central and lower Pinellas County, as well as in other areas of the Tampa Bay region, the West Coast Regional Water Supply Authority was formed. The Authority 1S developing well fields employing the latest technology to guard against further salt water intrusion and to assure long-term availability of domestic water suppl1es. SURFACE WATER All igator Creek is the surface water body nearest the site which would be influenced through site-related drainage. Accordi ng to the Ci ty of C 1 earwate r Env; ronmenta 1 Contro 1 15-4 METROl:D 590-298.06 ~ I I' I I I I 'I- I I I I I~ I, I I I I II I I Oi V1 sian, the water qua 11 ty i n All i gator Creek and A 111 gator Lake is fan to good, dependi ng upon samp 1 i ng 1 ocat i on, A major flood and water quality control effort being conducted by the City, the Alligator Creek Water Management ProJect, 1S under construct10n now. This project will attenuate flood1ng in the basin by provi di ng addi t lOna 1 storage dur1 ng extreme rai nfa 11 events, and wi 11 improve water qual i ty by provi di ng sediment traps and additional biological control within the floodway. All1gator Lake is a structure-controlled freshwater body undergo 1 ng acce 1 erated eut roph i cat i on due to its pos i t i on as the repository of nutrients draining from the Alligator Creek basi n. It is heavily infested wi th hydrill a and exhi bi ts algae blooms during the summer months, but fish kills have not been reported. TAMPA BAY REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION C. DESCRIBE THE WATER QUALITY MONITORING PROGRAM THAT WILL BE UTI LIZED TO MONITOR CHANGES IN THE QUALITY OF GROUND AND SURFACE WATER ANTICIPATED AND BROUGHT ABOUT AS A RESULT OF THE DEVELOPMENT ON AND ABUTTING THE SITE. A water qual i ty mon i tori ng program is not proposed for the site, as there are no permanent surface water bodies which could be monitored pre- and post-development. The C1ty'S present water quality monitoring programs have the ability to 1dentify any detrimental effects on water quality in the 15-5 METROl:D 590-298.06 ,I I I I I I t I I ,I -, I I I I I I I, I I Alligator Creek basin due to stormwater from the project vicinity. If such effects are identified, and are attributable to the project. remedial action will be initiated voluntarily, TAMPA BAY REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION D. DESCRIBE THE MEASURES WHICH WIll BE USED TO MITIGATE (OR AVOID WHERE POSSIBLE) POTENTIAL ADVERSE EFFECT ON GROUND AND SURFACE WATER QUALITY. The drainage and detention system for the project will include both dry detention and wet detention lakes designed to provide treatment of stormwater runoff to mitigate the degradat10n of water quality in ultimate receiving waters: Alligator Lake and Tampa Bay. The detention areas will be designed to promote mi xi n9 and aeration and set t 1 ement of part i cu 1 ates. The use of swales will assist 10 filtering pollutants prior to storm- water discharge into detention ponds. Wherever possible, dry detention and/or detention with percolation capability will be employed to assist in recharging the shallow aquifer. A combination of the stormwater control measures proposed should resul tin a pasi t ive contri but ion to present ground water quantity in the project vicinity. Water quality will be improved from raw runoff character; s tics pri or to di scharge from the site via ground and surface waters, 15-6 METROl:D 590-298.06 I' I I ,I I I" I I I 'I I I, I ,I I I I, I I QUESTION 16. ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES' WETLANDS A HOW MANY ACRES OF WETLANDS ARE FOUND ON THE SITE? FOR THESE PURPOSES, WETLANDS ARE DESCRIBED AS AREAS WHICH ARE SUBJECTED TO PERMANENT OR PROLONGED PERIODS OF INUNDATION OR SATURATION (WATER IS AT THE SOIL SURFACE AT LEAST 2 TO 7 MONTHS, 7 OUT OF 10 YEARS), AND/OR WHICH EXHIBIT VEGETATIVE COMMUNITIES AND/OR SOIL TYPES CHARACTERISTIC OF THIS HYDRO-PERIOD. Wetland classifications were determined using the Division of State Plannlngls Florida Land Use and Cover Classlflcation System, the u.s. Army Corp Engineers' Preliminary Guide to Wetlands of Penin- sular Florida, and field investigatlons. Approximately 2.6 acres of wetland are found on the site. The following table provides the acreage for each wetland type, TABLE 16-1 WETLAND ACREAGE PERCENT OF WETLAND VEGETATION EXISTING ACREAGE TOTAL SUBCOMMUNITY ACREAGE PRESERVED WETLAND ACREAGE Sawgrass Marsh 0.50 0.50 19 Sagittaria Marsh 0.30 0.30 12 Marsh Scrub 0.90 0.15 6 Marsh Scrub-Hardwood 0.90 0.35 13 2.60 1. 20 37 B. WHAT ALTERATION OR DISTURBANCES TO THE WETLAND ARE PROPOSED? A portion of the marsh scrub subcommunity will be removed for a road ri ght-of-way. Thi s area, Vl ewed as trans it i ona 1 re 1 at i ve to the 16-1 METROl:E 590-298.06 _,I I I I I I" I I' I I I I I :1 I I' I, I ,I marsh as a whole, ; scans i dered 1 ess Vl ab 1 e than the sawgrass and sagittaria marshes. Removing some of this portion will have little to no impact on the remaining marsh area, ApproXlmately 28 percent of the marsh scrub will be retained, with emphases on preservlng the most attractlve trees in the northern portlon of the scrub-hardwood area. C. WHAT WETLAND AREAS WILL BE PRESERVED IN THEIR NATURAL OR EXISTING STATE? DESCRIBE THE PLANNING APPROACH THAT WILL BE UTILIZED TO ACCOMPLISH THIS PRESERVATION? Only one wetland area occurs on the site. This wetland, generally classified as freshwater marsh. is an interrelated system of various vegetat ion subcommuni ties, The entire system encompasses approx;- mately 2.6 acres, The subcommunities include sawgrass marsh, sagit- tarla marsh, and marsh scrub of varying composition. These subcom- munities are described in more detail in Quesition 18. The center portion of thi s wetland area is recogni zed as bei ng a maJor aesthetic. as well as ecological. amenity to the site, and it will be utilized as open space. As such, alterations will be restricted to a portion of the marsh scrub and marsh scrub-hardwood leaving the sawgrass and sagittaria marshes intact. Table 16-1 shows the acreage of the wetland subcommunities preserved. 16-2 METR01:E 590-298.06 I' I I I I I I I, I I I I I I I' I, I I I 17. ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES, FLOOD PLAINS A. IS ANY DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOOD PRONE AREAS AS IDENTIFIED BY THE FEDERAL INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION? IF SO, INDICATE WHETHER ALL FLOOR ELEVATIONS WILL BE ABOVE THE 100-YEAR FLOOD PRONE LEVEL, AND DISCUSS METHODS WHICH WILL BE USED TO COMPENSATE FOR THE POTENTIAL FLOOD HAZARD, Accordlng to Federal Flood Insurance Rate Maps, the project slte is entirely within Zone C. Zone C indicates land areas WhlCh are above the SOO-year flood level. USGS quadrangles and site specific topo- graphic informatlon also confirm the hlgh and well drained nature of the project site. All floor e 1 evat ions wi 11 be above the IOO-yea r f1 ood 1 eve 1 , The fi na 1 master drainage des i gn for the proj ect site wi 11 es tab 1 ish on-site water levels under 25-year and laO-year design storm events. These water levels will be maintained in wet detentlon areas planned for water quantlty and quallty control on-site. The design storm- water 1 eve 1 s es tab 1 is hed in the master dra 1 nage plan wi 11 then be used to establish the crown elevations of internal roadways and the finished floor elevations within the project. This lnformation will be available to the City of Clearwater for review during the site plan approval process. B, DOES THE LOCAL JURISDICTION IN WHICH THIS DEVELOPMENT IS PROPOSED QUALIFY FOR FEDERAL FLOOD INSURANCE? IF SO. ATTACH A LETTER OF VERIFICATION FROM THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT. The City of Clearwater is a participant in the Federal Flood Insurance Program (see Exhiblt 17-1). 17-1 METROl:F 590-298.06 Ii I I I I I I I' I I I I I I 'I I I I I ~ ~~M~~' ti:i ,,,d/, e '\ ~e":I = ~s ~~ === ~1 \~ - ~J ~~l C I T Y OF CLEARWATER POST OFFICE BOX 4748 C LEA R W ATE R, F LOR IDA 335 I B CITY M....N...GER June 24, 1982 Mr. Edward Mazur, Jr., F.E. Reg:Lona1 Manager Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan, Inc. 2451 Enterprise Road Clearwater, Florida 33515 Dear Ed: The City of Clearwater has adopted ordinances for the regulation of construction in flood-prone areas and, thereby, meets the requirements of the Federal Flood Insurance Regular Program. Thus, owners of buildings within the City qualify for flood insurance under the Federal Program. An administrative policy has been established whereby the City of Clearwater does not interpret Flood Insurance Rate ~ps (~IRM) for purpose of determining whether privately-owned property is located in flood hazard zones. The City accepts such determinations as made by a professional engineer, architect, or surveyor licensed to practice ,in the State of Florida. Sincerely, Jf0s'. :a:~er Assistant City Manager EXHIBIT 17-1 .. Equal Em p loyment and A ff. rm ati ve Achon E mp loyer" II I I I I I I I I I' I I I I I I I I I QUESTION 18, ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES, VEGETATION AND WILDLIFE A IDENTIFY THE DOMINANT SPECIES AND OTHER UNUSUAL OR UNIQUE FEATURES OF THE VEGETATION ASSOCIATIONS DELINEATED ON MAP F, AND SPECIFY THEIR ECOLOGICAL FUNCTION, HEALTH AND CONDITIONS The slte1s vegetation may be classified into the following vegeta- tion communities: o Pine Flatwoods o Oak Scrub o Oak Hammock o Freshwater Marsh o Palmetto Prairie The location and areal extent of these communities are shown on Exhi bi t 18-1. Pine Flatwoods (25.5 acres) The plne flatwoods communities comprlse the primary vegetation systems. occupyi ng approximately fi fty-three percent of the site area. The overs tory is domi nated by scattered slash pi nes (Pi nus elliottii). The dense understory and groundcover are characterized by saw palmetto (Serenoa repens). gallberry (Ilex qlabra). wiregrass (Ari sti da stri eta) and var; ous scrub oak and herbaceous sped es. Species occurring in thlS community are shown below. 18-1 METR01:G 590-298,06 II I I I I I I I I I I I I, I I I I I I METR01:G COMMON NAME GENUS SPECIES Slash Plne Sand Pine Chapman Oak Wax Myrtle Llve Oak (scrub growth) Gallberry Sa ltbush Saw Palmetto Pokeweed Bracken Pigweed Common Ragweed Smutgrass Cordgrass Dogfenne1 Rosemary Grapevine W;regrass Precatory Bean Greenbriar Beauty Bush Burnweed Hemp Dogbane Plnus elliottii - Pinus c1ausa QUerCus chapmanil Myr;ca cerifera Quercus vlrginiana I1ex glabra Bacchar;s spp. Serenoa repens Riv;na humil;s Pterldium aqui1inium Amaranthus retroflexus Ambros;a artem;siifo1;a Sporobo1us poiretli Spart i na bakeri Eupatorlum cap;11ifo1ium Cerafio1a cricoides Vitis spp. Arlstida str;cta Abrus precator;us Smilax spp. Ca11icarpa amer;cana Erechtltes hieracifo1;a Apocynum cannablnum Pine F1atwoods - Burned (27.0 acres) A large portion of the pine f1atwoods community has been recently burned and ;s now dominated by secondary growth of woody shrubs. Few of the slash pines survi ved the burn; ng. and they have been rep 1 aced by wax myrtle (Myrl ca cer; fera). ga 11 berry (11 ex gl abra) and various scrub oak species. Saw palmetto dominates the understory wi th a dense ground cover of grapev; ne (Vi tis spp.). blackberry (Rhubus spp.) and cordgrass (Spartlna bakeri). The dead trunks of slash pines are prominent and no evidence of regenerative growth of th; 5 speci es was found. Other sped es in th; s sub-community are provided below. 18-2 590-298.06 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I METR01:G COMMON NAME GENUS SPECIES Chapman Oak Wax Myrtle Gallberry Saltbush Saw Palmetto Pokeweed Bracken Plgweed Common Ragweed Cordgrass Dogfennel Rosemary Grapevine Wiregrass Precatory Bean Greenbriar Beauty Bush Burnweed Hemp Dogbone Broomsedge Laurel Oak Shining Sumac Quercus chapmanli Myrica cerifera Ilex glabra Baccharis spp. Serenoa repens R wi na humil is Pterldium aqulllnium Amaranthus retroflexus Ambrosla artemisilfolia Spart 1 na bakeri Eupatorlum capillifolium Cerafiola cricoides Vitis spp, ArTStida stricta Abrus precatonus Smil ax spp. Callicarpa americana Erechtites hleracifolia Apocynum cannabinum Andropogon virginicus Quercus laurifolia Rhus copallina Oak Scrub (6.3 acres) The oak scrub community (six percent of the site area) is dominated by a va ri ety of scrub oak forms i nc 1 udi ng Chapman oak (Quercus chapman i i ) . turkey oak (Quercus 1 aev is) , 1 aure 1 oa k (Quercus 1 aurifo 1 i a) and 1i ve oa k (Quercus vi rgl ni ana). The unders to ry is open, contalning scattered growth of saw palmetto (Serenoa repens), gallberry (!lex glabra) and wax myrtle (Myrlca cerifera), while the ground cover is primarily composed of wiregrass (A~istida stricta), cordgrass (Spartina bakeri), various sedges (Carex spp.), grapevine (Vi t 15 spp,) and occass i ona 1 herbs. Other spec i e5 found in th i 5 community are provided below. 18-3 590-298.06 II I I I I I- I I I I I I I I I I I I I METR01:G COMMON NAME GENUS SPECIES Turkey Oak Li ve Oak Laurel Oak Myrtle Oak Wax Myrtle Saw Palmetto Cherry laurel Dogfennel Cordgrass Nightshade Mullein Greenbri ar Grapevine Panic Grass Cudweed Lantana Gallberry Quercus laevis Quercus vlrglniana Quercus laurlfol16 Quercus myrtlfolla Myrlca cerifera Serenoa repens Prunus carollniana Eupatorium capillifolium Spart i na bakeri Solanum nlgrum Verbascum thapsus Smilax spp. Vitis spp. Pamcum spp. Graphalium spp. Lantana camara !lex glabra Freshwater Marsh (2.6 acres) The freshwater marsh community is a system of sub-communities. As a whole, the freshwater marsh occupies approximately three percent of the site. The sub-communitles include sawgrass marsh, sagittaria marsh, marsh scrub and marsh scrub-hardwood dominated. For the most part, these communities form discontinuous rings with the sawgrass marsh occupying the inner portion of the freshwater marsh community. The sagittaria marsh and the marsh scrub occur in peripheral areas around the sawgrass marsh with the marsh scrub OccupYlng slightly higher elevations and the sagittaria marsh on areas having saturated so il s yea r- round. Sped es found in the fres hwater marsh commUnl ty are shown below. 18-4 590-298.06 I' I I, I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I METR01:G COMMON NAME GENUS SPECIES Sawgrass Pickerelweed Soft Rush Cri num Lily Slender Spikerush Duck Potato Duckweed Marsh Pennywort Water Hyssop Cordgrass Sedge Buttonbush Wi 11 ow Wax Myrtle Saltbush Swamp Tupelo Redbay Sweetbay Primrose Willow Smartweed Cutgrass Li za rd 1sT ail Cladium jamaicense Pontederia lanceolata Juncus effusus Crinum americanus Eleocharis baldwinii Sagittaria lancifolia Lemna minor -- Hydrocotyle umbel lata Bacopa caroliniana Spartina baker; Cyperus spp. Cephalanthus occidentalis Salix caroliniana Myrica cerifera Baccharis spp. Nyssa Sylvatica Persea borbonia Magnolia virginiana Ludwigia spp, Polygonum hydropiperoides Zizaniopsis miliacea Saururus cernuus Oak Hammock (35.5 acres) Two areas on the site contain the oak hammock vegetation community, Although both areas are similar, variations as a result of elevation and historical land use have given each hammock distinct differences in species composition. The first oak hammock (1.5 acres) occurs in a low area located in the northwest corner of the site and accounts for less than two percent of the site area, This hammock is dominated by live oaks (Quercus vi rgi ni ana) and vari ous ground cover sped es, i ncl udi ng grapevine (Vitis spp,), greenbriar (Smilax auriculata) and native grasses. 18-5 590-298.06 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I METR01:G The second oak hammock (34.0 acres) is located in the southern portlon of the site, and contains approximately thirty-four percent of the slte area. Within this hammock is an area which previously contained a small farm and residence. As a result, exotic trees are found in this hammock, The overstory is dominated by live oak (Quercus virginiana), Exotics found in the overstory and midstory i ncl ude camphor tree (Ci nnamomum camphora) and Brazi 1 i an pepper (Schinus terebinthefolius). Other species in the oak hammock vege- tation community are shown below, COMMON NAME GENUS SPECIES Live Oak Myrtle Oak Southern Magnolia Chapman Oak Camphor Tree Marl berry Wax Myrtle Saw Palmetto Grapevine Pokeweed Cordgrass Greenbriar Bracken Poison Ivy Virginia Creeper Quercus virginiana Quercus myrtifolia Magnolia grandiflora Quercus chapmanii Cinnamomum camphora Ardisia escallonioides Myrica cerifera Serenoa repens Vitis spp. Rivina humilis Spart i na bakeri Smilax spp, pteridium aquilinium Rhus radicans patthenocissus quinquefolia B. ARE ANY RARE OR ENDANGERED PLANTS FOUND ON THE SITE. IF SO. WHAT MEASURES WILL BE TAKEN TO PROTECT THESE SPECIES? No rare or endangered plants were observed during the project team site investigations, and none are expected based on habitats exist- ing on-site. 18-6 590-298.06 I' I I I I I- I I I I I I I I I I I I I C. WHAT WILDLIFE (INCLUDING AQUATIC LIFE) NEST, FEED, RESIDE ON OR MIGRATE TO THE SITE? WHAT MEASURES WI LL BE TAKEN TO PROTECT THIS WILDLIFE AND THEIR HABITATS? Wildlife that were observed during field investigations or could be expected to occur on the site as a resul t of compat i b 1 e range and suitable habitat conditlons are identified in Table 18-1. The site is presently surrounded by various urban land uses including a large shopping mall, major transportation routes, restaurants, residential development and various commercial and retail sales uses, Retention of the most viable portions of the marsh, as well as preservation of as much of the oak hammock vegetation as possible will help to provide habitat for a number of wildlife species that are capable of adaptation to an urbanized or altered landscape. D. ARE ANY OF THE WILDLIFE LISTED UNDER (C) ABOVE CONSIDERED ENDANGERED OR THREATENED SPECIES? IF SO, PROVIDE A DETAILED STATEMENT ON WHAT STEPS WILL BE TAKEN TO PROTECT THEM AND THEIR BREEDING, NESTING AND FEEDING AREAS. During site investigations, habitat conducive to utilization by the gopher tortoi se (Gopherus polyphemus) and the commensua 1 speci es Florida mouse (Peromyscus floridanus) and eastern indigo snake (Dry- marchon corais) was observed. Two osprey nests were also observed on the site. Although these nests showed no signs of habitation duri ng the peri od that fi e 1 d i nves t i gat ions were conducted, it is assumed that they are active nests during the ospreys' nesting and breedi ng season (November through Apri 1). No other threatened or endangered speci es were recorded, nor are any expected based on habitat, 18-7 METR01:G 590-298.06 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I METR01:G As stated prevlously, parts of the oak hammock, scrub oak and fresh- water marsh vegetation communitles will be preserved in Open Space. It is antlcipated that these areas wlll provide habltat conditlons supporting of a limited number of faunal species, including those discussed above. 18-8 590-298.06 II I I I I I I I I I I Amphlblans Reptiles Birds I I I I I I I I METR01:G TABLE 18-1 WILDLIFE SPECIES COMMON NAME Southern Toad leopard Frog Florida Cricket Frog Green Treefrog Strlped Swamp Snake Eastern Indigo Snake Yellow Rat Snake Corn Snake Eastern Garter Snake Dusky Pigmy Rattlesnake Eastern Diamondback Rattlesnake Peninsula Ribbon Snake Gopher Tortolse Florida Mud Turtle Eastern Box Turtle SlX Lined Race Runner Southeastern Five lined Skink Green Anole Little Blue Heron Great Blue Heron Cattle Egret Snowy Egret Louisiana Heron Green Heron Osprey Bobwhite Killdeer Mourning Dove Ground Dove Common Flicker Red-Bellied Woodpecker Yellow-bellied Sapsucker Downy Woodpecker Tree Swa 11 ow Blue Jay Common Crow House Wren Carolina Wren Marsh Wren Mockingbird American Robin 18-9 SCIENTIFIC NAME Bufo terrestris Rana utricularia Acri 5 gryl us Hyla cinerea Liodytes al1eri Drymarchon corais Elaphe obsoleta Elaphe guttata Thamnophus sirtal;s Sistrurus mlllarlUS barbouri Crotalus adamantus Thamnoph;s sauritus sackeri Gopherus polyphemus Kinosternon subrubrum Terrapene carolina carolina Cnem;dopherus sexllneatus furneces inexpectatus Anolls caroliniensls caroliniensls Florida caerulea Ardea herodias BU'i:iUTcus ibis Egretta ~ Hydranassa tricolor Butorides virescens Pandlon haliaetus Colinus vlrginianus Charadrius vociferus Zenaida macroura Columbigallina passerina Colaptes auratus Melanerpes carollnus Sphyrapicus var;us Picoides pubescens Iridoprocne blcolor Cyanocitta cristata Cornus corac Troglod~aedon Thryothorus ludovicianus Telmatodyles palustric Mlmus polyglottus Turdus migratorius 590-298.06 II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Birds (Cont,) Mammals METR01:G WILDLIFE SPECIES (Cont,) COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME Eastern Bluebird Red-eyed Vireo Yellow-throated Warbler Pine Warbler Common Yellow-throat Eastern Meadowlark Red-winged Blackbird Common Grackle Cardinal Rufous-sided Towhee Savannah Sparrow Chipping Sparrow Song Sparrow Sialia sialis Vireo olivaceus - Dendroica domlnica Dendroica pinus Geothylpis trichus Sturnella magna Agelaius phoeniceus Quiscalus quiscula Cardinalis cardinalis Pipilo erythropthalmus Passerculus sandwichiensis Spizella passerine Melospiza melodia Opossum Easter Mole Raccoon Cotton Mouse H;sp;d Cotton Rat Eastern Cottontail Rice Rat Florida Mouse Armadi 11 0 Didelphis marsupialis Scalopus aquaticus Procyon lotor Peromyscus gollypinus Sigmodon hispidus Sylivilagus floridanus Oryzomys palustris Peromyscus florldanus Dasypus novemcinctus 18-10 590-298.06 II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 19. ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES: HISTORICAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES A, ARE THERE ANY HISTORICAL OR ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES ON THE DEVELOPMENT SITE? IF SO, DESCRIBE AND LOCATE ON MAP D. DOCUMENTATION MAY BE ATTACHED IN THE FORM OF A LETTER FROM THE SECRETARY OF STATE IS OFFICE, DIVISION OF ARCHIVES, HISTORY AND RECORDS MANAGEMENT, INDICA- TING THE NEED FOR, OR RESULTS OF, AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL OR HISTORICAL SURVEY. There are no known historlcal or archeological sites on the develop- ment site, A professional archeological resource survey has been conducted on the project site, and the results of thlS survey are being made available in a separate report to the Florida Division of Archives, History and Records Management, the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council, and the City of Clearwater. B. IF ANY HISTORICAL OR ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES WERE LISTED UNDER (A) ABOVE, PROVIDE A STATEMENT AS TO THE STEPS THAT WILL BE TAKEN TO PROTECT THEM AND TO PROVIDE PUBLIC ACCESS, WHERE APPROPRIATE No archaeological resources have been found on site; however, should archeological resources be located during project construction, the app 1 i cant agrees that the u 1 t i mate di spas it i on of such resources would be determined in cooperation with the Divislon of Archives and the City of Clearwater. 19-1 METR02:0 590-298,06 II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I QUESTION 20. ECONOMY. EMPLOYMENT AND ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS A. PROVIDE A PROJECTION OF THE ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION EXPENDITURES BY DEVELOPMENT PHASE. BREAK DOWN BY TYPE (LABOR, MATERIALS, PROFES- SIONAL SERVICES, ADMINISTRATIVE, OVERHEAD, ETC.), AND ESTIMATE WHAT PERCENT OF THESE EXPENDITURES WILL BE SPENT WITHIN THE REGION. FOR LABOR, ESTIMATE THE NUMBER OF CONSTRUCTION EMPLOYEES DURING EACH PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT. Construction expenditures and employment for the Park Place develop- ment are estimated in Table 20-1. Project development costs are expected to total $91.6 million for the nine-year construction peri od. wi th emp 1 oyment averagi ng 155 persons, An estimated 96 percent of all construction phase expenditures are expected to occur within the Tampa Bay Region due to the projectls central location in the regi on and the ready avail abi 1 i ty of a regi ona 1 construct ion labor force and materials suppliers, B. FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, PROJECT THE NUMBER OF NON- CONSTRUCTION PERMANENT EMPLOYEES AT THE COMPLETION OF EACH DEVELOPMENT PHASE. USING APPROPRIATE DIVISION AND lWO-OIGIT (I. E. MINING-METAL MINING. RETAIL TRADE-FOOD STORES, SERVICES-BUSINESS SERVICES. ETC.). INCLUDE ESTIMATED ANNUAL PAYROLL. IF THE NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES WILL VARY SEASONNALLY. SPECIFY. Table 20-2 estimates the number of permanent employment positions that will be available in Park Place at the end of each development phase. Estimated payroll for the final year of each phase is also presented. At build-out, Park Place will employ over 4.900 persons and generate an annual payroll of $62 million. With good access from both sides of Tampa Bay. retail and office activities are expected to draw 20-1 METR02:V 590-298.06 I, ...J <( l- I 0 l- Ll.. 0 0 00011.0 00 001\0 o 00 01\0 0 00'1000'1 00 0'1 CO 0'1 000'1000'1 I- ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... I <.n Z I- Ll.l U U <c: c:: e.. Ll.l :E e.. I - ...J <c: z 0 - I c.::l Ll.l c:: oooT In oooT 0 oooT iJ"l I- ot"!oco..... t"! r-.iXl<.al'OO N r-......\OlnO'l iJ"l Z OOOOt"!N oq-iJ"l.....oq-\O ..... 'lit ocr..... 00 <x> ..... ~ ... ... ~ .... .... .. "'" ... ... ~.. 11III I 0 \000 N C\l0'l ..........r-.oooo r-.oo'lor-. l.U :E ..... Nt"! \0 Noq- .....CO U <c: """ """ """ """ """ """ <c: ...J e.. I :::.:: 0:: <c: e.. I- OOOT iJ"l OOOT 0 OOOT iJ"l I I- U-I Ot"!Nr-.N t"! r-. COin 0'10'1 N r-......r-.I.O..... In Z Ll.l<C OCONO'IO oq-LnO'llJ1iJ"l ..... oq-oq-.....lnl.O ..... l.U ..,1- 41!1 IIIIJ... ,.,. ... "'" filii .;10 If!! ..... .. ::E: 00 I.Oa:lNNO ..........r-.o..... r-.OOt"!..... ,. <.n 0:: l- N Nt"! .....r-. Noq-,..;.....O'I 0 I- e.. ~ ~ ~ """ ~ """ ...J U I e.. <C ::s: e.. w :E - 0 .....Z Ll.l . <c: <.n Ll.l OOOT Il'l OOOT In OOOT 0 I 0 <( <.n _ ....oq-r-.O'I..... 'lit ocrll'l\O,....N N 1l'l000('l1\O('I"I ,.... N V) ::1:<(- lDa)a'lNr-. oq-O'l""'I.OCCI .-i 0""''''''0'lU'') ..... W e..::I:_ ~ ~ ~ ,.,. ...,.,. ... .. .."... ... Ll.l 0:: e.. NM .-ia::l r-.ON('l'1oq- o oq-('I1 oq-('I"I ...J:l z ..... N ......... ('l'1 <.n CClI- 0 ~ ~ ~ """ ~ ~ (1,1 <(- - :::l I 1-0 I- ..... Z U Itt Ll.l ~ > e.. 0:: X I-Ll.l OOOT Ll1 OOOT 0 OOOT Ll1 N l.U V)V).... 0'\""''''''(7')1.0 t"l Or-.O'\Ln..... ('1"1 0'\ oq-I.O 00r-. 0.0 a:l Z<c:- 00 r-.O 0'\ a) oq-a) 00 0 ..... 00 U")l,C 000'\ ..-t 0'\ I LlJ 0::1: ~ ~ ~ ,., 11III,., ... ... ..... .. ,...; Vl u e.. N<""l ..-tl,C ,.....-IN('I"Il,C O'\oq-Moq-N -or .-I N .-I t"! +.I ::I: I- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c e.. u Itt l.U +.I Z .., <.n I 0 0 C - 0:: 0 l- e.. W 0000 0 0 OOOT In OOOT Ln u U <.n ON 00 U") U") C\l l"l1D0r-.<.a 0 ('1"1 CO CON..-t N :l <C- ('I"IO'loq-l.O M N..-tMOr-. ..... Ll10r-.r-..-I ..-t c:: ::I: "" ...,., ... .. ""'.. .. <.n I l- e.. ..-tr-l oq- 1.00'IN('l'10 r-...-tN('I1Ln " <.n N ..-t N C Z """ ~ """ """ """ ~ Itt 0 <.n U :::l 0 J::. I '"!:l +l "C +l "C +.I .... lU C '" C III C <.n (1,1 (1,1 <.n (1,1 (1,1 <.n (1,1 (1,1 C WJ::. 6 (I,IJ::. 6 (I,IJ::. EO .... U '- U s.. U I- '... (1,1 O"C ..- (1,1 0 ..-(1,1 0" (1,1 > > ..... 0 > > ..... "C Ll.l :> > ..... 0 '- I '-0 ... '-0 0 u '-0 '... III - (1,1....... EO '- - (1,1....... EO'.... ..-. (1,1....... 6 s.. .-I V) C Ll.l W ..... <.n (1,1 l.Us.. '--" Vl (1,1 l.U Q,I <.n l--o' 0 0. f--' > (1,1 ~ > 0. .... Z <.n .......... C z<.n .....'.... Co. o <.n ..... '.... C C Ll.l (1,1 tll+l 0 '- Wl1l 1C+l e .......(1,1 It!+l 0 '- :I :E'- c It! ..- 0 ::E: '- C It! '....~ ...J '- c: IC '.... 0 0 I e..:::l III 0 s.. ... ~ e.. :::l III 0 '- ....0 _ :::l III 0 '- +"~ EO O+l -..-+l U 0.... IIIIIIIIlt...~ U cc.... ,-.t.,... ~ U It! ...J.... It! VI VI ...J :::l (1,1 -I,... 1ll1ll\ll...J :::l (1,1 I- ... III VI III -I :::l (1,1 l.U "C iii.... II) t,. <( s.. el 1.lJ"C '... VI '... -or '- el Ll.l "C ...... ~..... <c: '- el s.. >c '- '-WCt- +l lU > C '-'-Q,lCI- +l Itt c:: C '- '-WCI- +" rtI lU l.UQ,lO Q,l~'....O \II '- I.lJQ,lOW~"-O VI s.. Q,l 0 <II '+- '.... 0 \II l- ..... o Q..Q +l061- C Q,l o Q..Q +l 0 E l- e Q,l 0 Q...c +-l CEl- t: CII ..... ::E: I x III Ill'-"C o > X III III '-"C o > Ll.l X IC lU '-"C o > 0 " ...J Ll.l -I re..-or u< Ll.l W...J::;:e..ee uee z Ll.l-l::E e..<c: wee 0 N - U - 0 -or - /Xl c:: l- Ll.. ::E: - I- Ll.l Ll.. 0 .... Ll.l 0:: ..-t N 0 ..-t N u..-t N ...... ::;: I II 0 I 0 0 '" '" .... w u_ I -- "'0"'0""'''"'0 '" '" '" "'0"''''00'''''' 0 0 ...- ....0'0 ..n U:ld'"..''''' ",...o.D ~ONl.C.Irl1'IDNl.O N 0 ... ,.,... ,., "'... ~ N ,., <:7l ....~ 0 ..... '" .... 171 .... ,., - ..... e 1-- ",0",0001n In In In 1n000lnlnOlll 0 I w_ ....Ill o <;I;) Ill"" oI'l7Io.D "'0"''''01''''_", ,., 0 I%: '" ... -'" Ill. ... N "":. 0 N 0 ... ,., w .... z ... - In'''l "'00'" ""'00 1 0 1 0111000 0 ..... =... ....... ..........o.D "',., ,., 171 "'IllNO'" '" :I: - o.D ..... ,.,. I 0 u ... I 0 I 0 ... ... 1-- III z_ , 1 1 I 1 , 1 In Ill'" , 0 1 "'0 o III III 0 ..... W_ "'.....ID 0 IDIIlIDN\Q .... -- :I: "'... ,., '" ,., .... ... ... N I '-" 0 ,., 0 ... ...j 0 VI ... ID~ < > ::z:: ...... I 1 , 1 1 I 1 III "'Ill 1 0' 0"''''0 III 0 ,., ... 0- ..,.17I1l1 0 "'.....,......... .... ,., "'N "'. ... '" ... ..... >- ... =- U ... '" - 0 I .... ... 0 ..J ... 1 , , 1 , 1 1 "'00 1 01 0"'000 0 171 0 0- "',., ,., 171 "'1Il"'0'" 0 I%: ... III ..... ... ... >- ... "'<"" ... ..... 1 ...U <:> e "'el.... I w:f'" ...j "" =1-1%: <z< I-w... ~ I 9 ... z: "" I- Z 0 '" ... 1-- 0 C Z z_ III 0 '" 0'" III 0 1 I 1 "" III , , 1 1 , 0 '" 0 I ~ ""- ....a. "'Ill......, ,., '" '" :I: ,.,... ... "': 0 .... a:: ... ... ~ ... 0 ... ..... ... .... = "" '" > II> ...- "'0"'000'" , 1 1 on 1 C 1 1 1 , , 0 0 C 0_ ....on 0<;1;) In.... ... ..... '" 0 I '" ... '" "":. "0" ....j C ... '" C < ... l- II> ... In In , "'ooon , 1 , 1 , , 1 1 , , 1 0 "0" a::_ ......... r--......1lI In 0 '" 0 ~ 0 .... u I .., ~ z e - N .... CIl z. C <0: .... .... CI I- IV ... < e z: I 11>'"0 I- a:: ....... VI .... .... "" -0 ... C C -- II> ..., ...~ '" ~ 0 '" ~ ~ o ... ..... ... e III CIl_ ... 011 II> II> II> < :; "' -........ III ... :; '" = ... '" '" '" U U .. ... 0 % "' 0 "" "' "' = '" o U ... el ... ... :::l c U;:c ... .::!~~ ... VIe.. ... 0 ::z:: I ra <.J Cl = U '" '" >- Cl > ......01100... 0 1 VI U C c = < ... "''''oO>u C .... '" 0 ... '" 'tl.._ 0 VI "' Q,II Q.J. '--~ - ... <;I;) N "' ... "' c ... ... w ... VI VI c... > III CIllii ::II: a. >- :I: <->IV...C C u 00 "' III '" 0'" <- c c '<;I w ... X ... 0- ... .. z: U.. w ... ",... ...0101< .... :; .... .....~....."...::J"'C- < ~ C '" u "'U)+J""'CI)~ ....j ....c "" ..."'04l....c... = U "'... - c "' ... '" .. . U e 0'" c u ... E"'- '" "' :::l C ... > OCQ,lU,....,.,. - I- a:: ... :::l I >- ~'"OO<llC U VI ra =... a:: 1In...,...""'......"u,..::..... :: >-'" 0. ll:l a:: CO..Q,....... z c '" ... ... "',"U"l:lOl=U..c <"0 Q, 0 ...o=o.=ra... ... _I::'" VI ~=~......'C...= 0.. c <: t:l C1...<<:.......Z .....-= ....==:I::....w<.... III ;-. ... ..; 0 -,,,, 41 VI "" I- w < = 41 0 e <.J I- :::l 0 VI ... N U z: "'... u a. ,., '" Z:~ 0 ~ IDIlI .... .... = a. %1- l> .... :I: I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I employees from both Pinellas and Hillsborough Counties, but Pinellas, part i cul arly Cl earwater and other mi d-county communities. wi 11 be the primary impact areas. No sign1ficant seasonal fluctuations in employment levels are ant1- cipated. Part-time employment will occur primarily 1n retail act i vi ties and wi 11 average about 2-3 percent of total project employment in most periods. Retail Development Retail activities will account for approx1mately 23 percent of total project employment. The applicant is considering several alternative retail development concepts, none of which follows the typical shopp1ng center profile of prospective tenant composition. The concept used for projecting employment and payroll envisions develop- ment of a specialty retail complex featuring a large number of smaller shops offering quality lines of clothing, jewelry, home furn is hi ngs , crafted goods and m1 sce 11 aneous goods. The comb; ned strength of these act i vi ties, when offered ; n a uni que phys i ca 1 setting, has the potential to draw from the major resldential centers throughout the Bay Area. as well as from complementary retail attrac- tions such as Clearwater Mall. Office Development Firms serving regional or national markets are expected to become the pri mary offi ce tenants at Park Pl ace due to 1 ts centra 1; ty to major business growth centers and ready access to Tampa International A; rport. Corporate reg; ona 1 headquarters and companies provi di ng 20-4 METR02:V 590-298.06 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I services to other businesses are key targets that should create new employment opportun1ties rather than relocation of existing activi- t1es. C. FOR ALL TYPES OF DEVELOPMENT, PROVIDE A BREAKDOWN BY INCOME GROUP FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION EMPLOYMENT USING THE FORMAT BELOW. FOR NON- RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS, ALSO PROVIDE AN ADDITIONAL BREAKDOWN BY INCOME GROUP FOR NON-CONSTRUCTION, PERMANENT EMPLOYMENT USING THE FORMAT BELOW. An approximate distribution of construction employees and permanent employees according to annual income earned 1S presented in Table 20-3. Persons with annual earn1ngs below $5,000 generally indicate part-time employment in retail act1vities. Assumptions used in preparing Tables 20-2 and 20-3 are shown in Table 20-4. D. FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, INDICATE WHETHER NON-CONSTRUCTION EMPLOYMENT IN THE PROJECT REQUIRES SPECIALIZED SKILLS OR TRAINING. WILL ANY EMPLOYEES REQUIRE TRAINING IN SPECIALIZED SKILLS AT EDUCA- TIONAL FACILITIES IN THE REGION? ARE SUCH TRAINING PROGRAMS PRESENTLY AVAILABLE? Reta i 1 act i vi ties wi 11 pr; ma ri ly be sma 11 er sped a 1 ty shops. Many will be run by proprietors who have previous retail experience or who can gain retail management training at local universities and business schools. Franchised stores often provide manager training for their employees. Clerks, cashiers and stock handlers can be drawn from the experienced regional labor force, and on the job tra1n1ng can be provided to new labor force entries under the close supervision that is often possible in small establishments, 20-5 METR02:V 590-298.06 - I I I TABLE 20-3 I EMPLOYMENT INCOME DISTRIBUTION(l) 1. CONSTRUCTION EMPLOYMENT BY INCOME GROUP I RETAIL CONSTRUCTION OFFICE CONSTRUCTION COMBINED RETAIL/ OFFICE CONSTRUCTION I I II III I II III I II III I INCOME LEVEL(2) Under $5,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $5,000-6,999 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 I $7)000-9,999 3 4 6 13 16 16 16 20 22 $10)000-14,999 6 11 14 33 40 39 39 51 53 $15)000-24,999 9 16 20 46 59 56 55 75 76 I $25)000 and over 2 4 5 12 14 14 14 18 19 TOTAL 20 35 45 105 130 125 125 165 170 I II. PERMANENT EMPLOYMENT BY INCOME GROUP I RETAIL CONSTRUCTION OFFICE CONSTRUCTION COMBINED RETAIL/ OFFICE CONSTRUCTION I II III I II III I II III I INCOME LEVEL(2) Under $5,000 15 40 70 0 0 0 15 40 70 I $5,000-6,999 70 175 300 95 220 330 165 395 630 $7,000-9,999 85 220 380 210 465 710 295 685 1)090 $10,000-14,999 60 170 305 545 1,225 1,865 605 1,395 2)170 I $15,000-24,999 15 40 70 185 410 635 200 450 705 $25,000 and over 5 15 25 65 150 230 70 165 255 I TOTAL 250 660 1,150 1)100 2,470 3,770 1,350 3,130 4)920 I (1) See Appendix 20-A for estimating methods and assumptions. I (2) 1982 Do 11 a rs I POST, BUCKLEY) SCHUH & JERNIGAN, INC. I I 20-6 METR02:J II I TABLE 20-4 I I I I- I I I I I I I I I I I I I ESTIMATING METHODS AND ASSUMPTIONS FOR EMPLOYMENT, PAYROLL AND INCOME PROJECTIONS Methods and assumpt 1 ons described here were used in prepari ng est 1 mates for Table 20-2 and 20-3. 1. Permanent Employment a. All ocat i on of retail space to vari ous types of estab 1 i shments was estimated based on the specialty retail center character planned for the project. Thi s profil e d iffe rs from the profi 1 e for a II typi ca 1" regional shopping center by reducing the General Merchandise share from the typical 38-50 percent level when department staes are anchors to about 7 percent at Park Place. Apparel. household and mlscellaneous groups absorb the difference. Offi ce space was di st ri buted pri mari 1 y to servi ce categori es that typically serve regional or extra-regional markets. Key uses were assumed to be business services, insurance adminstrative centers and technlcal or financial service firms. Local-oriented services (medical, legal, real estate, etc.) were assigned minor shares of office space. b. Numbers of employees were estimated for activities by using assumed Gross Leasable Area (G.L.A.)/employee ratios as follows: -400 sq. ft. G.L.A. per employee for all retail, personal service and recreation/amusement; G L.A. equals 100 percent of gross floor area. -300 sq. ft. G.L.A. per employee for all office uses; G.L.A. is about 85 percent of gross floor area. 2. Annual Payroll a. Average annual wage per employee for each SIC group was obtained based on flrst quarter payroll and employment in 1980, inflated to a 1982 value. b These estimates, mul tip 1 i ed by the number of employment pos 1 t 1 ons for each group in each phase and totaled for the project, yield an estimated annual payroll for the project at the end of each phase. 20-7 METR02:1 I' I I I I I I I I I: I I I I I I I I I 3. Income 01strlbutlon a. Income distributlon for constructlon employment was based on general di stribut 1 on reported for a Tampa construct 1 on company in 1979. After inflating wage levels to a 1982 value, percentage distribution used in each phase was found to be as follows: -Under $5,000 -$ 5,000 - 6,000 -$ 7,000 - 9,999 -$10,000 - 14,999 -$15,000 - 24,999 -Over $25,000 0.0 percent 0.5 percent 12.5 percent 31. 0 percent 45.0 percent 11. 0 percent b, Permanent employment income distribution was approximated by grouplng uses wi th s i mil ar average incomes and as suml ng a d is tri but i on for employees in those groups: RANGE OF MEAN WAGE SIC GROUPS IN RANGE DISTRIBUTION 0-5 5-7 7-10 10-15 15-25 25+ RETAIL PERCENT $ 5 - 7,000 58 $ 7 - 10,000 53, 54, 56, 59, 72, 78-79 30 34 22 11 2,5 0.5 5 28 36 24 5 2 $10-15,000 55, 57 1 11 21 49 14 4 OFFICE $10,-15,000 60-62, 65, 73, 82-83 o 10 20 51 15 4 $15-25,000 63-64, 80, 81, 89, 94-96 o 6 16 46 21 11 20-8 METR02:1 I' I I~ I I I' I I I I I I I I I I I I I Educational and trainlng needs of the office labor force will depend on the type of tenants who are attracted to the project. Major companies may be drawn here from outside the reglon by this area1s growing pool of skilled electronic data processing and communications workers, Area universlties are geared to this growlng field, and the 1 arge compani es provi de advanced or sped a 1 i zed trai ni ng for their employees. Tampa Bay I s emergence as a regional insurance center also may influence project tenancy of new companies who benefit from the availability of an experienced labor force. E. ESTIMATE WHAT PERCENTAGE OF THE NON-CONSTRUCTION, PERMANENT EMPLOYEES WILL BE FOUND LOCALLY, AND WHAT PERCENTAGE MUST BE DRAWN FROM OUTSIDE THE REGION. IF THESE PERCENTAGES WILL VARY THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT LIFE, SPECIFY. Retail activities are expected to draw virtually all of their employ- ment from the reglonal labor force. mostly from mid-Pinellas County, but extending also to Hillsborough County and other parts of Pinellas. The exception may be franchise outlets or national chains who send experienced people in to traln new managers and other employees, and to oversee operations during the start-up period. About 15-20 percent of the initial office employees are expected to be key personnel of major corporations who are relocated from other offices to begin operations in the Tampa Bay Area. Recruitment from the regional labor force will account for the remainder, Overtime, all positions will be held by permanent residents of the Tampa Bay region. 20-9 METR02:V 590-298.06 [I I I I I I I I I' I I I I I I 1\ I I I F WHAT WILL BE THE LOSS OF AGRICULTURAL OR FORESTRY RESOURCES ON THE SITE AS A RESULT OF THE PROPOSED PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT? REFER TO EXISTING LAND USE (MAP D), PROPOSED MASTER PLAN (MAP H) AND RESPONSE TO QUESTION 12-8. SPECIFY LOSSES OF ACREAGE, ANNUAL CROP YIELD, DOLLAR VALUES, ETC. There are present 1 y no agri cu 1 tura 1 or forestry production act lVi- t 1 es on the proj ect 51 te. The 26 acres of pi nes and 42 acre 5 of oaks and mixed hardwoods are not extensive enough or of sufficient quality to warrant major commercial cutting, and the appllcant intends to incorporate these areas as elements of the park-l i ke development setting wherever practical. G. IF THE DEVELOPMENT WILL CONTAIN A RESIDENTIAL ELEMENT, SPECIFY PERCENTAGE OF DEMANDS FOR EMPLOYMENT, RETAI L TRADE AND SERVICES, GENERATED BY THE RESIDENTS, THAT WILL BE SATISFIED WITHIN THE PROJECT (I.E., THROUGH THE PROVISION OF OTHER LAND USES ON THE SITE, ETC.) No residential development is planned for this project. H. WILL THE PROJECT RECEIVE ASSISTANCE FROM FEDERAL, STATE OR OTHER GOVERNMENTAL FUNDING PROGRAMS? IF SO, FROM WHAT AGENCY AND WHAT IS THE AMOUNT? There are not plans at present to use publ ic assistance program funds for the development of this project. I. HAS A MARKET STUDY BEEN PREPARED FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT? IF SO, A COpy SHOULD BE ATTACHED. IF NOT, DESCRIBE IN GENERAL TERMS HOW THE DEMAND FOR THIS PROJECT WAS DETERMINED. A preliminary investigation of general retail and office development activity was prepared for this project, but its scope was llmited to 20-10 METR02:V 590-298.06 I' ,I I I I I' Ii I ,I I' il I ,I' I' I II I " I METR02:V establish1ng a broad overview of growth potentials and development opportuni ties in the reg10n Recent trends cl early poi nt to the Tampa Bay Areal s emergence as one of the Sunbelt' s most active growth centers, with high-tech industries, electronlc software and commun i cat i ens, and ins urance 1 eadi ng the way for diverse economi c growth. Business and population growth is balanced on both sides of Tampa Bay. Due to its strategic location with good access to the major business and population growth centers, the Park Place site's strongest potentials are more closely associated with th1S areawide growth than with the goods and service needs of the immediate site vicinity. The preliminary concept for retail and office development at Park Place addresses that potential in the following manner: o A major retail specialty center is planned. Unlike the nearby regi ona 1 s hopp i ng malls, th is center wi 11 re ly on a uni que concentratlon of specialty stores in an attractive setting to draw shoppers from a broad market area. The central location offers the potential, but it wlll be the unusual character of the complex itself that will create demand for a special trip destination. This character will also attract shoppers patron- i zi ng 1 oca 1 reta i1 centers by provi di ng complementary retai 1 opportunities to the benefit of both Park Place and surrounding retail establishments. The large amount of office space to be provided will be suited to maJ or corporations des i ri ng a presti gi ous , hi gh- vi sib i 1 i ty a 20-11 590-298.06 I,' I ,I I ,I I I I I Ii I I .1 I I 1'1 II I I METR02:V set t i ng Wl th good acce s s to severa 1 bus 1 nes s centers and to regional air facilities. By creating a high-quality settlng, Park Place can help to attract large firms to the Tampa Bay Area who are considering relocation or expansion to the Sunbelt. With Pinellas County showing more balanced business and resi- dential growth in recent years, the site may also attract local firms who do business an both sides of the bay and desire a more central location with respect to their clients. The early analyses generally estab1 ished the development potential and determi ned that 1 eas 1 n9 rates and vacancy 1 eve 1 s suggest a feasible project. More detailed studies will be undertaken later to exami ne demand for spec; fi c types of reta i 1 uses and to i dent i fy prospective office tenants toward which marketing strategies may be oriented. J. PROVIDE AN ANALYSIS OF THE ESTIMATED AVERAGE ANNUAL AD VALOREM TAX YIELD FROM THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT DURING EACH PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT. I NO I CA TE ALL ASSUMPTI ON S AND STANDARDS. I NC LUD I NG ASS ES S ED V ALU E , EXEMPTIONS, MILLAGE RATE. ETC. The average annual ad valorem tax yield to Pine1las County, the City of Clearwater and the Pinellas County School Board in each develop- ment phase and after builctJut is estimated in Table 20-5. Methods and assumptions used in preparing estimates are as follows: 1. Assessed Value of Land and Improvements -- State 1 aw requi res assessment of property at full market value. Valuation proce- dures, however, use methods which result in values that fall somewhat below full market value. For Table 20-4, it was 20-12 590-298.06 'I 0 0 0 o:t (\") CO Ln (\")Lnr-- Ln I 0 ..... 0 0 0 ~ r-- C'\ CO r--o:tCO 0 w ..... o::r ~ Ln r-- r-- (\") CO COC'\o:t (\") Z ..... ~ ..... o::r N 10 ~ N a:l 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I 0 iA- iA- iA- iA- iA- iA- U 0 0 0 CO ~ C'\ ~ W 0 0 0 C'\ (\") C'\ Ln U ..... (\") CO ~ (\") o::r 0 ..... ..... ~ u.. 10 r-- o:t ~ 11 u.. 10 r-- 0 iA- iA- iA- iA- ....... ~ ..... 0 0 0 10 10 0 N <t 0 0 0 N (\") r-- (\") ~ ..... r-- o::r ~ ~ ~ (\") ". W I a:: CO (\") N N (\") iA- iA- iA- iA- I 0 0 0 C'\ 10 r-- C\I COLno::r r-- ..... 0 0 0 10 ~ ~ 0 coo::rco ~ ..... 10 N CO Ln 10 (\") Ln lOr--(\") CO ..... ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ CO ~ C'\ I iA- iA- iA- iA- iA- iA- w U 0 0 0 Ln N ~ CO ..... 0 0 0 C\I Ln CO Ln u.. ..... (\") r-- 0 (\") (\") ~ CO u.. ..... ~ ~ " 0 (\") 10 0 I Ln 10 iA- iA- iA- iA- - ~ 0 0 0 o:t C\I CO o:t - 0 0 0 0 ~ Ln r-- I In ..... r-- 0 r-- ~ ~ N W ~ (\") (\") 10 <t N N ~ iA- iA- iA- iA- ..... Ln ~ W II I In U 0 w<t N ~ 0 0 0 LO r-- ~ (\") LOO(\") CO XQ. ..... 0 0 0 o:t LO CO CO COOO CO w <t ..... CO C'\ r-- ~ ~ (\") ~N~ o:t ~ ~:.l:: ..... ~ i a:l a:: N ~ o:t <t ~<t N N ~ W Q. iA- iA- iA- iA- iA- iA- a:: 0 ~ ~ ..... 0 0 0 (\") C'\ ~ (\") <t <t 0 0 0 I' r-- o:t C'\ > ~ ..... 0 ~ ~ ~ II W ..... 0 a:: (\") ~ o:t <t ~ ~ iA- iA- ~ 4Ao 'I 0 0 0 N o:t C\I CO 0 0 0 N N ~ LO ..... 0 o:t o:t LO LO ~ ~ 4Ao iA- 1\ W In UJ <t In III ~ <t QI- Q. ~ 1II0~ I Q. +J~'- a:: - - e:_o 0 0 - 0 u.. QI +J u.. 0 0'-0 ~ '- oe~e: +JO OQlO :::l QI QI +J QI 0 e: O+J 0 +J 0>'-> ~ QI~ ~ m ~ I m ZOQle: UJ e4Ao ~~iA- 0 ~ 1\ UJ '- 0. ''- , ..... e: 4Ao'- ..~ '- 0.0 In> '- '-~ m '- In..... ~ m ~e'-QI UJ QI QI '- '- QI QI UJ:::l '- QI UJ.....Q.~ X ~ > Q,mQl~Q, Xa:l m~ :::l ::l <t<to o Q,U <t OU ~~~~ ~ ~:::lc.:J r-- a:l 0 ~ a:: a:l <te:mu <t Z 10 N....N ~ UJ .... ~ I >me:e: ~ ~Z~C'\~~OCO <t ~~ ~~ 0 <t 0"- 0 UJ<t+Jo::ro~ ~ ~ UJ u.. +J 0 ..... O~III ..... a:: e:.o,~, 0 a::<t e: 0 ~ 0 UJe:'- +J OUJ::ll'.c:CO+Jo::r ~ 0 ::l.c:+J ~ In m QI 0 ~ c.:J 0 4Ao U 4Ao ''- 4Ao ~~ o U''- 1n~Q. e: <t<tU-In-U- <t<t UlnU UJ > a:: >:::l I In UJ Z ~ In 0> OZ <t<ta:l <t<tct: CD U ct:ct:<t a:l U C\I 0 a:: ..... ..... ..... ..... UJ I ~ ..... ..... ~ II I I, I I 'I I I, 'I I I If I I II I I 'I' I METR02:V assumed that assessed value would be at roughly 80 percent of project market value. which lncludes: land costs; projected construction phase costs (Table 20-1); and an assumed profit (a percent above costs that would be lnvestment return in a bUlld- sell arrangement). No property exemptions were assumed. 2. Personal Property -- Retail and office equipment and furnishings are taxed as personal property, Values are depreciated. but the va 1 ue each year is taxed at about the same rate as real property. A value at roughly 10 percent of the assessed valuation of retail buildings and 15 percent of office buildings is assumed here to represent a conservative estimate of the average depreciated value of personal property. 3. Millage Rates -- Millage rates for Pinellas County, the Pinellas County School Board and the City of Clearwater in 1981-82 were used and held constant for the development period. 4. Ad Valorem Tax Computation -- Average annual tax yield is approximated by averaging the amounts derived when millages are applied to the project1s estimated assessed values at the beginning and end of each development phase. K. ESTIMATE THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS COSTS THAT WILL BE BORNE BY THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF ALL PUBLIC FACILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS NOT PROVIDED BY THE DEVELOPER. The following sections identify general types of facil ities needs that could require substantial one-time expenditures in order to provide basic urban services to Park Place. The development approval process provides local government the opportunity to determi ne how these expenditure needs can be met, and 1 tis not 20-14 590-298.06 I' I ,I I I 'I I j, ,I: I, 'I I I ~I, I, I I- I' I, METR02:V reallstically possible for the applicant to anticlpate what conclusions local governments may reach as to funding approaches or appropri ate 1 eve 1 s of pub 1 i c fi nanc i a 1 commi tments Consequent 1 y , th is section can on ly i ndl cate II typi ca 111 or pos sib 1 e approaches, rather than IIproposed" methods, for fi nanci ng improvements as a basis for estimating local government fundlng requirements to serve this project. 1. Water and Sewer Water and sewer services wi 11 be provided by the City of Clearwater. The developer will pay for installation of on-site service lines. No new off-site improvements are anticipated in order to serve the project, but the project will generate about $400,000 in hook-up and environmental lmpact fees which will pay for connection to the system and use of capacity of treat- ment plants and transmission lines. User charges cover operat- i ng costs. 2. Drainage The developer will pay on-site drainage costs which will result in minimal impacts on off-site facilities. Any modifications that are required for off-site public facilities are tYPlcally funded from general revenues. 3. Solid Waste Solid waste collection will be provided by the Clty of Clearwater. Pinellas County is responsible for providing waste di sposa 1 faci 1 it i es. Capi ta 1 improvement needs can be funded directly from user charges or by borrowing based on projected user revenues. 20-15 590-298.06 - I I I .1, I I I- 'I :1 I J 'I' I I 'I I I I 'I' I' METR02:V 4. PubllC Health, Safety and Welfare Fire, police, emergency medical service and health serV1ces are flnanced from general and/or shared revenue sources No maJor fac1l1ties (e.g. fire stat10n, health center, EMS station) are expected to be needed to serve this project. Manpower and equipment costs can be funded by revenues generated by the project through property taxes ($487,000 per year to the City alone at build-out), utility and franchise taxes, or shared revenues from retail sales. Schools Most school impact w1ll be indirectly associated with the proJect as a result of the new employment it generates. Park Place will generate nearly $1 million 1n school taxes per year at build-out, and new residents also pay taxes on the1r homes. Employees drawn from out of state will not be elig1ble for the $25,000 homestead exemption on school taxes for the first five years. Transportation Costs The developer will construct all on-site roadways. Improve- ments to the off-site street network are paid for through a combination of local, state and federal funding sources. Local shares are typically ralsed from general sources, special assessments, shared gas tax revenues and/or impact fees or charges. Impact fees, when charged on a unit basis that can equitably distribute the cost burden among all who use the system, pose a means of financing capital improvements to 5. 6, 20-16 590-298.06 1,1 II I, I I, I I I I ,I I I I 'I, I, I I I I METR02:V augme nt the other sources, Deve 1 opment regu 1 at ion procedure s of many local governments, however, are only geared to assess 1 ng impacts of major proJects. They frequently requi re identified costs to be at least partly defrayed by impact charges that are imposed only on these types of development, even though the development typically generates revenues at the same per-unit rate as uses in other developments. 20-17 590-298,06 ,II I I- I I' I- I ,I I I, I I I, I I I I I I 21, PUBLIC FACILITIES: WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT A. AS STIPULATED IN THE PRE-APPLICATION PROCESS, THE APPLICANT AGREED TO PRESENT TWO LETTERS IN LIEU OF THE ADA QUESTIONS. THE FIRST LETTER, PRESENTED IN APPEND I X I, I S FROM THE APPLI CANT REQUEST! NG THE CITY OF CLEARWATER REVIEW THE PROJECTED DEMANDS FOR SERVICE BASED ON PROJECT PHASING, AND REQUESTING A RESPONSE AS TO THE CITY'S ABILITY TO PROVIDE TREATMENT. THE SECOND LETTER, EXHIBIT 21-1, IS THE CITY'S RESPONSE REGARDING SERVICE TO THE PROJECT The project would be entlre1y served by existing wastewater treatment plants owned and operated by the City of Clearwater. A recently constructed north interceptor force mai nand pumpi ng station wi 11 provi de the Ci ty the abi 1 i ty to di vert f10ws from the East p 1 ant, WhlCh is operating near permitted capaclty, to the Northeast plant which is well below capacity. This force main is scheduled to become operational in July 1982, upon which the City's present administrative moratorium on new flows to the East plant will be lifted. Operation of the interceptor will divert approxlmately 2.5 million gallons per day to the North plant. During preparation of this application, the Cities of Oldsmar and Safety Harbor inquired as to the effect of the project on the City of Clearwater's Northeast plant, particularly pertaining to the City of Safety Harbor's current allocation of 1 million gallons per day of the capacity of that plant. The City of Safety Harbor is presently utilizing slightly more than half of its 1 million gallons per day allocation. When the north interceptor is operating, flow to the Northeast plant will be approximately 4.5 million gallons per day, slightly over half its permitted capacity. Since wastewater generated on the Park Place site will be split to both Northeast and 21-1 METR01::J 590-298.06 ,I I ,I I I I 'I ,I ;1 I I I I I I I, I I I, OF CLEARWATER C I T Y POST OFFICE BOX 4748 C LEA R W ATE R, F LOR IDA 335 1 8 C 1 TV ....A..AGER June 24, 1982 Mr. Edward Mazur, Jr., P.E. Regional Manager Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan, Inc. 2451 Enterprise Road Clearwater, Florida 33515 Dear Ed: The City has reviewed your projections of wastewater flow for the Metro Development Corporation Offtce/Retail Park DRI. The project location and the topography of the project site suggests that flows from the project will be split to the north and south, with treatment at both the northeast and east plants. As you know, the capactty of these plants is based on a Wastewater allocation permit from the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation. Recognizing this, the approximate capacity of the northeast plant is 8.0 MGD; and the capacity of the east plant is 5.0 MGD. Present flows to the two plants are 1.48 ~D and 4.85 MGD, respectively. Based on these figures and present estimates of demand growth within the service areas, the City can accommodate the wastewater from the project through building in 1991. Regarding your inquiry about the City's present administrative moratorium on new flows to the east plant, this moratorium should be lifted in July of this year. We do not foresee any problems for your project in this respect. Two collection systems would serve the project. One consists of B-inch and IO-inch lines which run west along Drew Street to U.S. 19, and then north to the north interceptor. The other consists of 12-inch and l5-inch lines along S.R. 60, which runs to the east plant. Both lines appear to have capacity available, and tbe probable north/south split from the project looks appropriate for the system; however, more detailed information will be needed during site plan review in order to definitely ascertain whether or not existing off-site collection will be adequate or will need improvements. If I can be of further ass~stance, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, ~: ~:2r Assistant City ~nager EXHIBIT 21-1 .. E qua I E mp loyment and A ffi rmati YO Ac ti an E mp layer" I I I I, I I I I 'I I 'I I I I, I I, I I ,- ~ East plants, the project's impact on the Northeast plant 1S estimated to be less than 0.1 mgd. Considering the available capaclty at the Northeast plant, the project's impact on the Cities of Safety Harbor and Oldsmar will be negllgible. 21-3 METR01::J 590-298.06 - I I I I I I, 'I I I I I I I I I I I I I 22 PUBLIC FACILITIES: DRAINAGE A. AS IS PROVIDED FOR IN THE PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW ADOPTED BY TBRPC (APPENDIX 2) THE APPLICANT STIPULATES TO SATISFY THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER AND THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION FOR STORMWATER QUANTITY AND QUALITY CONTROL. THE APPLI- CANT ALSO AGREES THAT THE COMPLETED APPLICATION TO FDER FOR A STORMWATER DISCHARGE PERMIT WILL BE COPIED TO TBRPC AND THE CITY OF CLEARWATER. IT IS FURTHER AGREED THAT THE ABOVE STIPULATIONS SHALL BE A CONDITION OF THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER FOR THE PROJECT. The Master Drainage Plan for the project is shown in Map G. The design objective for the Master Drainage Plan was to provide adequate and safe stormwater conveyance and storage capacity for the project, and to control stormwater qual ity through a ser1es of cascaded biological and physical treatment opportunities. The spec1 f1 c methods by whi ch these obj ect i ves are accomp 1 is hed are discussed under the following topics: Swales Swales will be used wherever poss1ble to convey stormwater to deten- tion areas and to major discharge points. The ability to incorporate swa 1 e systems ; nto the Water Management Plan for the project wi 11 depend largely on the response of the C1ty of Clearwater during the site plan review. Dry Detention Areas More than half of the stormwater detention capability for the project site is proposed to be dry detention areas. These areas will collect runoff from swale conveyances and deta1n it in grassy depressions so that as much runoff as possible can be percolated into the shallow groundwater table, thereby deriv1ng both aquifer recharge and water 22-1 METROl:K 590-298.06 II I, I I I I- I I 'I I I, I' I I I I I I I~ METROl. K quality control benefits. Dry detent10n areas will be located primarily w1thin green belts and open space corridors, so that they may be viewed as green space wlth only occaslonal periods of inundation. Wet Detention Areas Three moderately sized wet detention areas are shown on the con- ceptua 1 Master Drainage Pl an. Each performs a part i cu 1 a r function related to its general location within the project site. The northern most detention area serves as a final stormwater collec- tion point prior to discharge from the site. The conceptual design provides for preserving a section of oak hammock above the detention area, with a filtrat10n berm discharging into a collector swale and thence through the area of oaks to an off-sHe outfall, and ul t i- mate ly to All i gator Cree k. The east-central wet detention area is located adjacent to an exist- ing freshwater marsh. This area 1S designed to rece1ve runoff via swale collectors, and then to divert waters collected in the wet detention area through the marsh prior to discharge beneath the east-west parkway road. The southern most detention area serves as a final collection point for s to rmwater pri or to discharge from the site and u 1 t i mate ly to Tampa Bay. This area also proposes a filtration berm prior to ultimate discharge. 22-2 590-298.06 , I I I I I I I I I I I I" ,I I I I I I I, I' METR01:K It is antlcipated that the wet detention areas would be constructed in accordance with City of Clearwater requirements with shallow slde slopes to a depth of 6 feet, and then steeper s 1 de slopes to a depth as deep as pract1cable. This is proposed in order to take advantage of the greater resiliancy of deep lakes to the potent1al for accelerated eutrophication sometimes observed in man-made lakes. Conservation Areas Two conservation areas are proposed to be incorporated in the storm- water management system. These include a portion of the oak hammock in the northwest corner of the project site, and the central portion of the freshwater marsh in the east-central area of the project site. The freshwater marsh conservation area wi 11 i ncl ude all of the sawgrass and saggitaria vegetat10n commun1ties. a small portion of the mars h scrub commun i ty , and a 1 a rger portion of the marsh scrub - hardwood community. Portions of the latter two communities would be excavated to provide wet detention area. Water Control Structures Discharge from detention areas will be controlled by a system of control structures composed of various combinations of berms, weirs, and culverts. Rates of dlscharge will be limited to pre-development levels for the design storm event, and structures will be designed to comply with the water quality requirements of DER. 22-3 590-298.06 r I I I, I I I I I I I I I, I I I' I I I I I 23. PUBLIC FACILITIES: WATER SUPPLY A AS STIPULATED IN THE PRE-APPLICATION PROCESS, THE APPLICANT AGREED TO PRESENT TWO LETTERS IN LIEU OF THE ADA QUESTIONS. THE FIRST LETTER, PRESENTED IN APPENDIX I, IS FROM THE APPLICANT REQUESTING THE CITY OF CLEARWATER REVIEW THE PROJECTED DEMANDS FOR SERVICE BASED ON PROJECT PHASING, AND INQUIRING AS TO THE CITylS ABILITY TO PROVIDE SERVICE. THE SECOND LETTER, EXHIBIT 23-1, IS THE CITY. S RESPONSE REGARDING ITS. ABILITY TO SERVE THE PROJECT. The potab 1 e water demand proJ ect 1 ons fo r project by phase were provi ded to the Ci ty of Cl earwater in the 1 etter contai ned in Appendix 1. The response from the City of Clearwater is shown in Exhibit 23-1. As the City1s letter indicates, the existing water supply network surrounding the project site is more than adequate to provide ser- vice. Water pressures are also adequate, and long-term water supply for the City is competently provided through existing wells within the City and through additional water purchased from Pinellas County. It is likely that irrigat10n within the project site will be required in order to maintain the extensive landscaping and native vegetation. Irrigation water would be drawn from shallow wells penetrating the shallow water table, and from wet retention areas allowing recapture of nutrlents which may escape dry detent10n areas. Water supply for fire protection is considered under Question 30: Fire. 23-1 METROl:L 590-298.06 I' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I / '~\~(;;~---,. ll~~~~ };:; ,\ I 1/.... !i1. \ ~ ' -~ ~ ~~ -:---,E- <~ ~~ ~ ~- ~~ "p-= ~ - ts: \ 'I.~ 0- ~,\ ~'e4TE\\~;/ #'..,..,,,,~,,~P C I T Y OF CLEARWATER POST OFFICE BOX 4748 CLEARWATER FLORIDA 33518 CiTV i4A.NAGEA June 25, 1982 Mr. Edward Mazur, Jr., r.E, Regional Mqnager Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan, Inc. 2451 Enterprise Road Clearwater, Florida 33515 Dear Ed: The City of Clearwater currently has wAter mains adequate to serve the project proposed by Metro Development. Estimated total need of water for the project is .182 MGD. Existing are a l2-inch water main on the north side of Gulf-to-Bay along the perimeter of the proposed project, a l2-inch water main along the west side of Hampton Road the full length of the project, and a l6-1nch water main on the north side of Drew Street along the northern perimeter of the proposed project. Water pressures in these lines are currently 55-60 p.s.i., which should be adequate for the complete project. Sincerely, g..-- El ahetn ~er As iatant City Manager EXHIBIT 23-1 "EQUAL. EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPL.OYER" II I I- I ,I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I, 24. PUBLIC FACILITIES. SOLID WASTE A PROVIDE A PROJECTION OF THE AVERAGE DAI L Y VOLUMES OF SOLID WASTE GENERATED AT THE COMPLETION OF EACH PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT Solid waste volumes projected at complet1on of each phase of develop- ment are prov1ded in Table 24-1. B. IF ON-SITE SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL WILL BE PROVIDED. SPECIFY: At the present time it is anticipated that solid waste wi 11 be picked up by the City of Clearwater Sanitation Department, and di sposed of at the Pine 11 as County Resource Recovery Plant. The types of waste generated by the project are anticipated to be primar- ily paper and paper products, which have a favorable BTU content per ton. It is pos sib 1 e that on site waste di sposa 1 through i nci nerat ion, with heat recovery for heating water or possibly driving absorption chillers for air conditioning, will be a viable option. This option will be considered during deta11ed project design, in cooperation with the Pinellas County Solid Waste Department. C. IF OFF-SITE SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL IS PLANNED, ATTACH A LETTER FROM THE AGENCY OR FIRM PROVIDING SERVICE OUTLINING: (1) THE PROJECTED EXCESS CAPACITY OF THE FACILITIES SERVING THE DEVELOPMENT AT PRESENT AND FOR EACH PHASE THROUGH COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT, (2) ANY OTHER COMMITMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN MADE FOR THIS EXCESS CAPACITY. 24-1 METROl:M 590-298.06 i' I I, I I I. I I I I I I I I I I I I I PROJECT COMPONENT TABLE 24-1 SOLID WASTE GENERATION (Cumulative) PHASE I PHASE II PHASE II I 1983-1985 1986-1988 1989-1991 T/D* Y/D** TIC YID TID Y!D 2.1 10.7 5.5 27.5 9.7 48.5 1.5 7.4 3.3 16.7 5.1 25.6 3.6 18.1 8.8 44.2 14.8 74.1 Reta i 1 Office Total * T/D - Tons per day ** YID - Cubic yards per day REP64:X1 590-298.03 II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I (3) A STATEMENT OF THE AGENCY'S OR FIRM'S ABILITY TO PROVIDE SERVICE AT ALL TIMES DURING AND AFTER DEVELOPMENT (THE AGENCY OR FIRM MUST BE SUPPLIED WITH THE SOLID WASTE GENERATION TABLE IN (A) ABOVE.) Appendix I contains a letter addressed to the C1ty of Clearwater request i ng a response rega rdi ng ab i 1 i ty to se rve the proj ect wi th solid waste collection services. Exhibit 24-1 is the response from the City of Clearwater. Exhibit 24-2 is a letter addressed to the Pi ne 11 as County So 11 d Waste Department requesting 1 nformat i on on solid waste disposal. Exhibit 24-3 is the letter from the Pinellas County Solid Waste Department providing the response to the question above. 24-3 METR01:M 590-298.06 I' I I I CITY MANAGER I I I I I, I I I I I I I I I 'I C I T Y OF CLEARWATER POST OFFICE !'lOX 4748 CLEARWATER FLORIDA 33518 June 25, 1982 Mr. Edward Mazur, Jr., P.E. Regional Manager Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan, Inc. 2451 Enterprise Road Clearwater, Florida 33515 Dear Ed: The retail and office buildings proposed by Metro Development will most likely use front-end commercial containers provided by the City of Clearwater. Container capacity varies according to need, but most establishments use those which hold approximately four cubic yards. Pick-up by the Sanitation Division is on a regular $chedule. For this project, three times per week would be a reasonable schedule to expect. The City currently has the capacity to serve all phases of the proposed project, estimated at 519 cubic yards of solid waste per week, using existing personnel and equipment. Sincerely, f7'- JC.' ft . Elizabeth Assistant "Ii..... - " S. lIaeseker City Manager EXHIBIT 24-1 "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" II ~ I I. I I I' I I I I I I I I I I I I I P ~B ;fJ Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan, Inc. CONSULTING ENGINEERS and PLANNERS 2451 ENTERPRISE ROAD CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33515-2012 . 813/79&-7215 . TELEX 808435 June 16, 1982 Mr. Robert Becker Pinellas County Solid Waste Department 315 Court Street Cl earwater) Flori da 33516 Dear Mr. Becker: We have been retained by Metro Development Corporation to prepare an Applica- tion for Development Approval (ADA) for an Office/Retail Park to be located in the northeast quadrant of the intersection of S.R. 60 and U S. 19. This Appli- cat i on wi 11 be submi tted to Tampa Bay Regi ona 1 Pl anni ng Council under the Development of Regional Impact review process. Analysis of solid waste gener- ated by project is a required element of the application; one portion of which requires a response to the following questions: IF OFF-SITE SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL IS PLANNED, ATTACH A LETTER FROM THE FIRM OR AGENCY PROVIDING SERVICE OUT- LINING: 1. The projected excess capaci ties of the faci 1 i" ties serving the development at present and for each phase through completion of the project. 2. Any other commitments that have been made for this excess capacity. 3. A statement of the agency's or firm's ability to prov i de serv ice at all times duri ng and after development (the agency or firm must be supplied with the solid waste generation table in [A] above). We understand that, assuming the project site will be annexed by the City of Cl ea rwater, the City would provi de Soli d Waste Co 11 ect ion servi ce; however, all waste would be disposed of under Pinellas County authority. We are, there- fore, providing solid waste generation projections to both governmental juris- di ct ions, and we will rely on rep lys from both City and County in p repa ri og the answer to the solid waste section of the ADA. The attached Table (24-1) shows solid waste generation by phase through bU11dout of the project. EXHIBIT 24-2 it I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Mr Robert Becker June 16, 1982 Page Two We would very much appreciate your response to the ADA question stated above, as well as any comments or suggestions you may have regarding solid waste dis- posal for the project. Very truly yours. ZL:~ INC. J. Kevin Henderson Proj ect Manager JKH/ac Attachments cc: Mr. Larry Wolfe Mr. Ed Mazur 590-298.03/REP64:W I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I BO.A~D OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER-S DEPARTMENT OF SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT 315 COURT STREET CLEARWATER FLORIDA 33516 PHONE (813) 448 3990 COMMlSSIONEFlS CHARLES E RAINEY, CHAIRMAN BARBARA SHEEN TODD, VICE-CHAIRMAN GABRIEL CAZARES JOHN CHESNUT, JR BRUCE TYNDALL 82-0108 '. ~ ;J I 2t~ ~,......", . v j.jO"- June 25. 1982 ----......~~- Mr. J. Kevin Henderson Project Manager Post. Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan, Inc. 2451 Enterprise Road Clearwater. FL 33515-2012 ---~_I -----1=--". "- ...........-..............._-~"'""""- -~-- ! J-~ ----- I - , Re: Metro Development Corporation Applicat1on" Dear Mr. Henderson: Pinellas County has the responsibility for providing disposal facilities for all solid wastes generated in the County. We are presently meeting this responsibility through the availabl1ity of two major landfills. We also have under construction a substantial Resource Recovery Facility which, when opened in 1983. will process all processible solid wastes in the entire County (2,000 tons per day capacity). Our official financial statements indicate that sometime in 1987, there is likely to be excess processible wastes generated. Our present plans call for gradually increasing our landfill activities, as waste generation will grow beyond the plant's capacity, until the next cycle of resource recovery investment can be Justified. In the meantime, the County is actively pursuing the planning for transfer capacity to deliver wastes to the Resource Recovery Site (where the landfill is also located), and that transfer station network will easily handle all wastes included in the subject application through the year 2000 and beyond. If I can be of further assistance, please let me know. ~ver ~~?:' 'o~; ';~~' /.. /d ~/.!-r ;~--- ~'0't& 7 C. Robert S. Becker Solid Waste Operations Manager RSB: 1tl EXHIBIT 24-3 PINELLAS COUNTY IS AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 25. PUBLIC FACILITIES: ENERGY A. PROVIDE A PROJECTION OF THE AVERAGE DAILY ENERGY DEMANDS AT THE END OF EACH DEVELOPMENT PHASE FOR EACH OF THE FOLLOWING: ELECTRICAL POWER, GAS, OIL, COAL, ETC. FOR ELECTRICAL POWER, ALSO PROVIDE THE PEAK HOUR DEMAND AT THE END OF EACH PHASE. Projections of average daily electrical demand and peak hour elec- trical demand are provided 1n Table 25-1. These projections assume that the project wou 1 d be served so 1 e 1 y by e 1 ectri city. however, natural gas is also available to the project site through the City of Clearwater Gas Transmission System. Given the energy efficiency of natural gas as a source of heat at end-use points, it would be des i rab 1 e to use natural gas for such purposes as heating water. Although projections of gas use cannot be made at the present stage of project planning, any gas utilized would displace electricity, to the overall benefit of the region's energy source mix. B. IF THERE IS TO BE AN ON-SITE ELECTRICAL GENERATING FACILITY (POST- CONSTRUCTION) WHAT IS ITS CAPACITY AND USE? There are no on- site e 1 ectri ca 1 gene rat i ng fad 1 it i es planned for the project. C. IF ELECTRICAL POWER IS TO BE OBTAINED FROM AN OFF-SITE SOURCE, ATTACH A LETTER FROM THE FIRM OR AGENCY PROVIDING SERVICE OUTLINING: (1) THE PROJECTED EXCESS CAPACITIES OF THE ELECTRICAL GENERATION FACILITY AND TRANSMISSION LINE TO WHICH CONNECTION WILL BE MADE AT PRESENT AND FOR EACH PHASE THROUGH COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT, (2) ANY OTHER COMMITMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN MADE FOR THIS EXCESS CAPACITY, (3) A STATEMENT OF THE SUPPLIER'S ABILITY TO PROVIDE SERVICE AT ALL TIMES DURING AND AFTER DEVELOPMENT. (THE SUPPLIER MUST BE PROVIDED WITH ELECTRICAL POWER DEMAND INFORMATION IN (A) ABOVE.) 25-1 METR01:N 590-298.06 II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TABLE 25-1 PROJECTED ELECTRICAL ENERGY DEMAND (Cumulative) PROJECT COMPONENT PHASE I 1983-1985 ADO* PD** Retai 1 1,980 600 Office 9,657 2,610 Total 11,637 3,210 * ADO - Average Daily Demand (KWH) ** PD - Peak Demand (KW) '-, \ \ -, 'I 7 v- ::- :'71 '-t _ ( " ,- ...-/ ' /' ' /1 I '-. -J '''''('.j f \" --.." \ '" \ ,.- r ;/_ \""- \ .~~'- f ' ,,/-'" REP64:U1 PHASE II 1986-1988 ADD PO 5,148 1.560 21,756 5,880 26,904 7,440 -,,/ /' ./" " '-- / j PHASE III 1989-1997 ADD PO 9,108 2,760 33,3DO 9,000 42,408 11,760 590-298.05 II I I I I I" I I I I I I I I I I I I I Florida Power Corporat10n would service the proJect. Correspondence request1ng a response from Flor1da Power to thlS portion of the ADA is shown in Exhibit 25-1. Exhibit 25-2 shows correspondence received from Florida Power Corporation 1ndicating the1r ab111ty to serve the project. D. WHAT CONSIDERATIONS RELATIVE TO ENERGY CONSERVATION HAVE BEEN INCOR- PORATED INTO THE SITE PLANNING, BUILDING DESIGN AND EQUIPMENT SELEC- TION FOR THIS PROJECT? Site planning for the project is in the very preliminary stages, and bu 11 di ng des i gn has yet to be i ni t i ated. Equ i pment selection wi 11 be incorporated into the bui 1 di ng des i gn process. I n response to energy conservat10n considerations, the following concepts represent a list of useful ideas which will be used during the site planning and building design processes as development goals and guidelines. Site design considerations will include maximal retention of native vegetation, to assist in shading parking lots and open space areas, and to minimize requirements for irrigat1on, fertilization, and , \ pesticide use. An internal system of pathways for pedestrian and 1 bicycle use will provide an alternative to automobile travel internal \ to the site. The close proximity of office and retail space will I also encourage pedestrian movement as opposed to use of automobiles. I i Bui 1 di ng ori entat i on will be cons i dered duri n9 site p 1 ann i ng and ; bui 1 di ng des i gn , in order to mi n i mi ze the detri menta 1 effects of i ~excess heat gain on east and west building faces. 25-3 METR01:N 590-298 06 [II p B Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan, Inc. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I s J CONSULTING ENGINEERS and PLANNERS 2451 ENTERPRISE ROAD CLEARWATER FLORIDA 33515 2012 . 8131796727S . TELEX 808435 June 15, 1982 Mr. Bruce Power Clearwater Engineering Department Florida Power Corporation P. O. Box 33101 St. Petersburg, Florida 33733 Oear Mr. Power: We have been retained by Metro Development Corporation to prepare an Applica- tlon for Development Approval (ADA) for an Office/Retail Park to be located in the northeast quadrant of the inters ect i on of S. R. 60 and U. S. 19. Th is Appllcation will be submitted to Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council under the Development of Regional Impact review process. Analysis of future energy demands associated with the project is a required element of the application; one portion of which requires a response to the following questions: IF ELECTRICAL POWER IS TO BE OBTAINED FROM AN OFF-SITE SOURCE, ATTACH A LETTER FROM THE FIRM OR AGENCY PROVIDING SERVICE OUTLINING: 1. The projected excess capacities of the elec- trical generation facility and transmission 1 i ne to whi ch connection wi 11 be made at present and for each phase through comple- tion of the project. 2. Any other commitments that have been made for this excess capacity. 3. A statement of the to provide service at and after development. supplier's ability all times during In the present case, Florida Power Corporation would be requested to serve the project. The attached Table (25-1) shows electrical energy demand projections by phase through buildout of the Park. Also attached are exhibits showing the project location, Master Concept Plan, and adjacent land uses; and a narrative description of the park. EXHIBIT 25-1 II I I I I I I I I' I I I I I I I I I I I.lr Bruce POv..'er June 15, 1982 Page Two We would very much appreciate your response to the ADA question stated above, as well as any suggested refi nements to our e 1 ectr1 ca 1 demand proJE'ct 1 ons Thank you. Sincerely, POST, BUCKLEY, SCHUH & JERNIGAN, INC. ~-JLL--- J. Kevin Henderson Project Manager J KH/ ac Attachments cc: Mr. Larry Wolfe Mr. Ed Mazur 590-298.05 REP64:V I' I - .. - -.., , J ~ 19B2 I , ; JUL 2 I . ~ ~ :;.~ ~" - " ~ .......,. ...P P \; ~, I ) I, ",. .'. '? , , ...--- ".Ji ,( - CL ~' \ ----------- ;~~..~ -- - I --- Rorida \ I - Power .- - - c 0 ~ POR,I,f I 0 I'll - I - EllE June 30, 1982 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Mr. J. Kev1n Henderson ProJect Manager Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jern1gan, Inc. Consult1ng Eng1neers & Planners 2451 Enterpr1se Road Clearwater, Flor1da Dear Mr. Henderson: Per your request, I am happy to 2nform you that Flor1da Power Corporat1on has the necessary power fac211t1es to connect your proposed off1ce/reta11 park located 1n the N.E. quadrant of the 1ntersec2on of s. R. 60 and U. S. 19. If we may be of further ass1stance 1n th1S matter, please do not hes2tate 2n call1ng us. SJ.ncerely, FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION ,~ ___ 7 /7 '-<-- J.. 1---<- / f \,,,, ~...:-- ~ Ernest E. Baker, Superv1sor D1str1but1on Eng1neer1ng, Clearwater EXHIBIT 25-2 P.o Box 1699,2166 Palmetto Street, Clearwater, Florida 33517 - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Building design and equipment selection w1ll consider such features as the use of double pane and solar reflectorized glass, atr1um and 5 kyl i te concepts for natural dayl i ght contri but ions to 1 nter1 or spaces, sun screening and protective overhangs, task orlented lighting and photo-sensitive lighting level adjustments, hlgh effi- ciency lighting, var1able volume heat1ng, vent11ation and air condi- tion1ng systems including outside a1r economizers, and computer con- trol ed energy management systems to control peak demands and to optimize space condit1oning . E. IF ALTERNATIVE ENERGY SOURCES HAVE BEEN CONSIDERED FOR THIS DEVELOP- MENT, WHY WERE THESE ALTERNATIVES SE lECTED OR DISCARDED? (E. G. , SOLAR ENERGY SYSTEMS, ETC.) Alternative energy sources which will be considered for the proJect include solar water heating, water heating with natural gas. waste heat recovery, and on-site resource recovery. These options will be evaluated during building design, when specific applications can be established and equipment options evaluated against one another on a 11fe cycle basis. 25-7 METROl:N 590-298.06 I' I' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 27. PUBLIC FACILITIES: RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE A. DESCRIBE RECREATIONAL FACILITIES AND OPEN SPACE (INCLUDING ACREAGE) WHICH WILL BE PROVIDED ON SITE. LOCATE ON MAP H. WILL THESE AREAS OR FACILITIES BE OPEN TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC? The Master Development Plan for Park Place designates 5.0 acres as parkland. The recreational facilities planned for the parkland will be geared to serve pr1marily the needs assoc1ated with this project. Because of the urban oriented development program, these facilities will be passive in nature and may include plazas with pedestrian seat i ng areas, textured pay i ng, t re 11 i ses. 1 us h 1 andscap 1 ng , and fountains. In addition to the designated parkland on the Master Development Plan, an additional ~ 10 acres will be incorporated into the site deve 1 opment as 1 andscaped open space. Th is open space wi 11 be in the form of buffer st ri ps along the main i nterna 1 roads and along the exterior boundaries of the project. Within these lushly land- scaped areas a pedestrian circulation system will interlink the park area and the various tracts. At the present tlme it is envisioned that a public easement will be provided across these open space areas to provide accessibility to the pedestrian pathway system. To the extent possible the pathway system will be designed to avo1d the vehicular traffic system while providing the shortest and most direct route from one building to another. Bicycl1stS and joggers will be encouraged to use the system through provision of the meanderlng pathway system which will be accentuated by lush 27-1 METR01:P 590-298.06 II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I landscaping, street furnlture, and a varlety of topography created through earth berms and sculpturing. Wherever possible deslrable natlVe vegetation will be saved. When these areas occur Wl th in the park area or the open space sys tern. every effort wi 11 be made to des i gn around and incorporate thi s vegetat10n to retain the inherent character of the site. Additional amenity value will be provided to the project by the internal lake and drainage system which will be incorporated into all aspects of the slte design. Th1S system in combination with the open space and park areas will also provide habitat for b1rds and small animals. The basic object1ve of the parkland/open space system at Park Place is to create an environment which can both satisfy some of the recreational needs of the project and create a desirable setting in terms of image and amenities for the Park. B. WILL THE DEVELOPMENT REMOVE FROM PUBLIC ACCESS LANDS OR WATERS PREVIOUSLY USED BY RESIDENTS OF THE REGION FOR HUNTING, FISHING, BOATING OR OTHER RECREATIONAL USES? SPECIFY. The development site is privately owned and currently provides no pub 1 i c access for hunting, fi sh; ng, boating, or other recreat i ona 1 use. 27-2 METROl:P 590-298.06 I' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I c. WILL PARKS AND OPEN SPACE BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OR COUNTY? IF NOT, WHO WILL MAINTAIN THE FACILITIES? The final determ1nation as to parkland dedicat10n has not been resolved at this time. The current proposal is for the developer to own, improve and maintain the parkland and the open space system on the project site. Final ded1cation requirements will be determined at the local level during development approval negotiations. 27-3 METR01:P 590-298.06 ", I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 28. PUBLIC FACILITIES: HEALTH CARE WHAT MEDICAL OR HEALTH CARE FACILITIES WILL BE PROVIDED ON SITE? SPECIFY TYPE, SIZE, POPULATION TO BE SERVED, ETC., AND LOCATE ON MAP H. Health care facilities are not specifically planned within the proJect. As was agreed during the TBRPC pre-appllcation process (see Appendix 2) the primary concern regarding health care facilities and the project is related to the City's ability to provide emergency medical service. Appendix 1 contai ns a 1 etter request 1 ng i nformat i on on EMS fac11 it i es from the City of Clearwater. Exhib1t 30-1 (see Fire section) contains the City.s response, indicating that the City maintains four EMS units, each with a three-man crew, and that the station nearest the project is approximately one quarter mile from the site. 28-1 METR01:Q 590-298.06 'I II ,I I I I I 11 I I I I' I I I I I I I 29. PUBLIC FACILITIES: POLICE WHAT POLICE PROTECTION SERVICES, FACILITIES, OR SITES WILL BE DEDICATED OR OTHERWI SE PROVIDED ON- SHE? DESCR I BE THE SERV I CES OR F AC I LITI ES , SPECIFY ANY CONDITIONS OF DEDICATION, AND LOCATE ON MAP H. It is not intended that police protection facilities would be located on the project site. The City of Clearwater is anticlpated to prov1de pol ice protection to the project. A letter from the appl icant to the City requesting information on the City's ability to provide police protect ion is shown in Append i x L The City I s 1 etter in response is provided 1n Exhibit 29-1. 29-1 METROl:R 590-298.06 ~I I I II I t ,I I I I I I 'I I I I ,I 1\ I ~i~,~~ ~~~~~.. ..)c..i ,\ I, !';: ~ ~" ~ ~C"":I _ ~~ ~~ - - ~~ ~- ~i ~~ OF CLEARWATER C I T Y POST OFFICE BOX 4748 C L E P R W ATE R, F LOR I D A 335 18 ~ I TY ~A~ AGER June 24, 1982 Mr. Edward Mazur, Jr., P.E. Regional Manager Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan, Ine, 2451 Enterprise Road Clearwater, Florida 33515 Dear Ed: The Clearwater Police Department provides police protection and law enforcement services to residents, businesses, and visitors throughout the corporate limits of the City. The Police Department is staffed with 175 sworn officers and 89 non-sworn personnel. The officer/ population ratio to permanent residents is 1.8 officers per l,OOQ. Officers are d~stributed throughout the City in patrol zones established in accordance with statistical data related to calls for service and other pertinent criteria. This ensures rapid officer response to emergencies and patrol services. The department provides a full line of law enforcement service that includes patrol, traffic enforcement, investigations, crime prevention, security surveys, community relations, etc. ,.- .. ~ ~ ~ S, Haeaeker City Manager EXHIBIT 29-1 .. E qua I Em pi oyment and A ffum ati ve Action E mp loye," I' '1\ I, 1\ I II, I ,i' I, I I .- 'I 'I il II: 1\ ,I 1\ I 30. PUBLIC FACILITIES FIRE WHAT FIRE PROTECTION SERVICES, FACILITIES, OR SITES WILL BE DEDICATED OR OTHERWISE PROVIDED ON SITE? DESCRIBE THE SERVICES OR FACILITIES, SPECIFY ANY CONDITIONS OF DEDICATION, AND LOCATE ON MAP H. The letter from the applicant requesting a response from the City of Clearwater regard1ng the ability to provide fire protection services is provided in Appendix I. The City's response is shown 1n Exhibit 30-1. It is not anticipated that fire protection services or facilities would be provi ded on-s i te. However, 1 n response to concerns regardi ng adequate fire protection for the project, the four points listed in Exhibit 30-1 regarding a fire alarm system, sprinkler system, water mains of adequate size, and apparatus availability will all be coordinated with the City of Clearwater during later stages of project planning and development. 30-1 METR01:S 590-298.06 i~ 1\ I \ t II I I ,I i }I :1 >> 'I I) I tl III I ,I C I T Y o F CLEARWATER POST OFFICE BOX 4748 FLORIDA 33518 CLEARWATER CITY ....M..GER June 24, 1982 Mr. Edward Mazur, Jr., P.E. Regional Manager Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan, Inc. 2451 Enterprise Road Clearwater, Florida 33515 Dear Ed: The proposed project by Metro Development will, by its magnitude, increase the demand for fire and EMS services from the Clearwater Fire Department. Effective fire protection for life safety and property protection will be required in the form of; 1. Complete supervi~ed Fire Alarm System. 2. Supervised Sprinkler System. 3. 12" Water Mains to provide adequate water supply for material fire loading within the structures. 4. Apparatus availability to the structures for effective fire and EMS emergencies. First assignment response to the development would be Fire Station Number Five, located approximately one-quarter mile south at 520 Sky Harbor. An engine with four firefighters and a rescue unit with three paramedics are based at this station. Fire Station Number Four, located at 1700 North Belcher, 2.9 miles northwest, ~ll respond with a snorkle, squad truck, and an engine rlth a total complement of eight men. The Shift Commander (Captain) responds on all fires from Station Number One, 610 Franklin, 4.8 miles. Presently, the Clearwater Fire Department has four units equipped for advanced life support. All four units have three-man crews, of which Station Number Five is the closest. Response time$ for fire and EMS service fluctuates with various conditions, such as daylight hours co~ared to night hours, weather conditions, traffic, etc. An accurate response ttme for equipment arrtva1 cannot be indicated due to the afor~ntfoned conditions. However, the pverage response time for the department throughout it~ Fire District is currently 3.5 minutes. If we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to call on me. S1nc~ ~'d ~ ~~ Elizabeth S. ija~:k~ Assistant City Manager - EXHIBIT 30-1 "EQUAL. EMPL.OYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" r III .. j I I ( ,I 'I 1\ II 'I , Ii '1 I 'I I II, , I I I I' I DRU 10 AD Iol.lUN Si Aut_ AvE EN1EFIl'RISE liD ,. ;0 '" "- VIIIGINIA 1 SUNSET POLN T IiO 2L 2L OIlEW S1 4L -, ea .~ ." . ~ . ...j .. CLfVELANO ST GULF' TO' BAY BLVO OLD TAMPA BAY NURSERY R 0 2L. NIJIISEIlY RO 2L 2L 2L ...j .,. 0 '" ~ g " .... ... .. .. '" E BAY Oil 4L 4L VO ~ tl - NUllBER Of' IIOYING lANES IN BOTH 0 I IIltCT I OtIS o TIlAFFIC SIGNAL LOCATION .. IIltTRO OEVltlOPlil ENT TRAFFI C I II PA<:T AIIEA o '14 1/2 SCALE IN II'LES STREET NETWORK INVENTORY EXHIBIT 31-1 II I' \I~ I' I I' II I I, I 1\ I, 'I I, 1'1, I' ,I I' I Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard is the second most heavily traveled highway in the area. Th1 s facil i ty extends from Cl earwater Beach eastward through the study area to Tampa West of U. S 19, Gul f-to-Bay Boulevard malnta1ns six travel lanes with turn lanes at major inter- sections. East of U.S. 19, Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard operates w1th four through traffic lanes A number of other arterials and collector streets parallel these two major north- south and east-west arterial s. Hercul es, Belcher, 01 d Coachman, McMull en-Booth and Bayshore are si gnifi cant north-south roadways serving the area. These vary between two and four traff1c lanes at midblock. East-west streets in the study area include S.R. 588, S.R. 590, Drew, Cleveland, Druid, Harn. Nursery, Belleair and Roosevelt. Agaln, each of these streets parallellng Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard is composed of two to four traffic lanes. The local access streets in the study area were omitted from Exhibit 31-1 for simplicity. As shown in this illustration, traffic signals are typically located at the intersections of the streets carrying significant traffic volumes. Daily Traffic Volumes Average Daily Traffic volumes on the study area street network are moni to red by the Ci ty of C 1 earwa ter and the Flori da Department of Transportation. Current volumes are shown in Exhibit 31-2. From the ill us trat ion, it can be seen that U. S. 19 carri es the 1 arges t number of vehicles per day, followed by Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard. The 31-3 METR03:C 590-298.04 I 'I' I, I I I I , -. If 'I' I ii' I, 'I \ II, I, II , I . I I' l ALLEN AVE RC ~6~0 ,.. ~ <>. 13,OZO ... <>. <>. 3 .J : <>. S\JNSEi' 16,46 GlLF' TO. ll.I.Y CAul C AD. OLD TAMPA BAY ZI,51O 21,830 HAINES 8A"'SHORE RO o '" Ii! li! '" '" >< '" '" '" <> .J ... '" E SZ,970 SOURCE' CITY OF Cl.EARWATER I FOOT o 1/4 1/2 SCAlf: IN "I LES EXIST. AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES EXHIBIT 31-2 II I .1, ,I ,j I '- I, I , 'If I , ~ I 'I /1, I, 'I ,I I I hi ghes t vo 1 urnes along U. S. 19 occur between Drew and Coac hman Road with nearly 64,000 vehlcles per day. Dally vol urnes on Gul f-to-Bay are largest just west of Belcher, where nearly 52,000 vehlcles per day were counted. Other highways parallelling each of these accom- modate s i gnl fi cant ly fewer vehi cl es throughout the day. Roosevelt and Belcher are the only other facilities in the study area carrying over 25,000 vehicles per day. Typically, other streets in the study area have an average daily volume of less than 20,000 vehicles per day. Seasonal Traffic Variations Traffic volumes in the study area fluctuate with respect to time of the year. Traffic volumes in the months of January, February, March, April and December are higher for all street links. During the months of May, June, July, August and September, traffic volumes are below average. The months of October and November appear to best represent average yearly travel conditions. Table 31-1 identi- fi es the percentage above or below average trave 1 cond it ions for each month. These percentages were developed from data collected by Florida Department of Transportation permanent count recorders located in the study area. Traffic Growth Trends The Florida Department of Transporation maintains seven permanent count stations with in the study area. Ten year annual average growth factors were calculated for each count statlon Averaging these, the past ten-years exhibited an average traffic growth rate of 6.2 percent per annum. 31-5 METR03:C 590-298.04 I' I' ,I, I ,I' t~ f I I 'II 'I' 'I' , I 'I ii, ,I', 'I II I-~ " Ii Table 31-1 Seasonal Traffic Variations Month January February March Apri 1 May June July August September October November December Source: FOOT continuous count locations in study area. 31-6 METR03:H Percent Above or Below Annual Average + 3 74 + 7.27 +14.64 + 6.64 - 3.80 - 4.18 - 5.56 -12.19 - 9.94 + 0 90 - 1. 02 + 3.51 590-298.04 I I ,I I I '. 'I j I 'I, I ,I I I I' I I, I i Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Da il y t ra ffl C VO 1 urnes in the study a rea pea k between the ho urs 0 f 7'00-8:00 A.M. and 4:30-5.30 P.M. Traffic volumes for each hour and each direction of travel are shown graphically ln Exhiblt 31-3 for two locatlons. These two locations are located approxlmately one- quarter mile east of the site on Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard and approxl- mately one-quarter mile north of the site on u.s. 19. As can be seen from the Gulf-to-Bay location (upper figure) the morning peak hour is sigmficantly less than the afternoon peak hour. At this location, the morning peak hour amounts to 5.0 percent of the daily traffic volume, while the afternoon peak hour totals 8.4 percent of the daily val ue. Peaking characteristics on u.s. 19 are more distinct for the mornlng peak hour than was the case for Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard. During the morni ng peak hour, 6. 2 percent of the daily traffi c on U. S, 19 occurred, while the afternoon peak consisted of 7.4 percent of the da i1 y traffi c. The traffi c 1 n the morni ng pea k shows southbound travel to be significantly more than the northbound traffic, while the reverse is true in the afternoon peak. This trend is character- istic of the home-to-work trip in the mornlng and the work-to-home trip in the afternoon in relatlon to the locations of major residen- tial and employment areas. Hourly vehicle counts were made for the afternoon peak hour at all major intersections within the study area. Morning peak hour turn counts were made at three intersections where ingress to the site 31-7 METR03:C 590-298.04 I' I ,J I I 'I' 'I I I I. I I I' I, I I I I I may be a potential problem. These morning counts include the inter- sections of U.S. 19 at Drew Street, U.S. 19 at Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard and Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard at Hampton Road. Morning and afternoon peak hour intersection counts were recorded in June of 1982. Because June is typically found to be below average in the seasonal traffic volume levels, the observed traffic counts were increased by 4.18 percent to represent average annual peak hour traffic conditions. Exhibit 31-4 (A and B parts) identify the annual average (factored) afternoon turning movements for 1982. Where morning turning movements were counted. they are shown in parentheses. level-of-Service The quality of traffic service provided by a street system is mea- sured in terms of the capacity of the system versus the traffic volumes which use the system. The level-of-service concept is a standard means of expressing the types of traffic conditions associ- ated with various traffic volumes versus faclity capacity. There are six levels-of service, Levels A through F. which relate to driving conditions from best to worst, respectively. The character- istics of traffic flow for these various levels-of-service are summarized in Table 31-2. In level-of-service IIDII. operating speeds are considered tolerable by the general public. As in similar urban traffic studies, level- of-service IIDII was assumed as the lowest acceptable service level for the street network during peak periods. Traffic conditions 31-9 METR03:C 590-298.04 I' I ,I I I t t I I I, I I I I I 'I I I I SVNSE:T POINT ~O ~ .. .. a '" .. " l @ @) 8 @ OREW ST PART A 1982 PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENTS EXHIBIT 31-4 I I ... > Q .. a: ; ::; ,I :> x u u ::; ..J ... :z: '" I, I t 'I' I I, I 1 'I I I I I I 1 I Q a: .. .. .. :z: u .. Q u Q ..J o o Q a: ~ Ii: ~ :z: GULF. TO. BAY BLVO ~- ~~~ 1" ~ f/ \ ~I ~ ~ OLD TAil PIl BAY ~ ~ l HAINES IlAYSI40M RO ROOSEVELT BLVO PART B 1982 PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENTS EXHIBIT 31-4 I' I I I I I I' I I I I I I I, I I I I I METR03:I Table 31-2 Level-of-Service Concept Level-of-Service A lie lie lie lit lie lie lie Free flow conditions Low volumes High operating speed Uninterrupted flow No restriction on maneuverability Drivers maintain desired speeds Little or no delays Level-of-Service B lie lie Stable flow condition Operating speeds beginning to be restricted Level-of-Service C lit Stable flow, but speed and maneuverability restricted by higher traffic volumes Satisfactory operating speed for urban conditions Delays at signals lie lie Level-of-Service D lie lie lie lit Approaching unstable flow Low speeds Major delays at signals Little freedom to maneuver Level-of-Service E lie Lower operating speeds lie Volumes at or near capacity lie Unstable flow lie Major delays and stoppages Level-of-Service F lit lie lie lie Forced flow conditions Low speeds Volumes below capacity, may be zero Stoppages for long periods because of downstream congestion 31-12 590-298.04 I' I I I I I I I I I 'I ,- I I I 'I I I I METR03:C worse than this service level may warrant street improvements, a dlversion of traffic to other routes, and for other traffic manage- ment s trategi es. For average daily tra ffi c , 1 eve 1- of- serv ice II CIl was assumed to be the lowest acceptable service level for the street network. Peak hour intersection levels-of-service were calculated uSlng ex; st i ng peak hour t ra ffi c vo 1 urnes and intersection geometry. The methodology used in the level-of-service calculation utilizes IlCriti- ca 1 Movement Summat i onll descri bed in detail in The Transportation Research Circular Number 212 - Interim Materials on H1Qhway Capacity - January, 1980. Daily highway link capacity was calculated using lntersection capa- city restraints at either end of the link (lane geometry, signal phasing and signal timing), the percentage of daily traffic occurring during the peak hour, the number of mainline traffic lanes in both directions, and characteristics concerning curb parking and lateral restrictions. This methodology is identical to that used to develop daily service volumes (capacities) in the Urban Transpor- ation Planning StUdy (UTPS), with the exception that data was entered by 11nk whereas the UTPS procedure used general assurnptlons. Appen- di x II I contai ns detail s of the procedure used to determi ne 1 ink capacities. Peak hour levels-of-service calculated for each intersection and 31-13 590-298.04 II I I I I I I I I 'I I I I I I I I I I daily malnllne effectlve levels-of-service are identlfied ln Exhiblt 31- 5 As shown in thl s i 11 ustrat ion, the 1 ntersect ions of U. S. 19 at S.R. 580, Countryside, and Roosevelt; Gulf-to-Bay at Belcher, and Drew at Belcher currently operate below level-of-service IIDII. Three intersections (U S. 19 at Sunset Point, U S. 19 at Coachman, and Gu If- to- Bay at McMu 11 en- Booth) operate wi th 1 n 1 eve 1- of- serv ice II DII today. The remaining intersections currently operate at 1 eve 1- of- serv ice II CII or better duri ng peak conditions. The mainline daily capacity considerations were also identified for critical locations. The highway section of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard between Hercules and Belcher lS the only section operating at level- of-service liP'. Mainline daily levels-of-service along U.S. 19 north of the site and sections of Drew Street west of U.S. 19 cur- rent 1 y operate at 1 eve l-of- serv ice 11011. Other roadway 1 inks in the study area are within level-of-service lIe" or higher. EXISTING PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION CONDITIONS The Central Pinellas Transit Authority (CPTA) operates four bus routes within the transportation study area. The location of each route is shown in Exhlbit 31-6. Table 31-3 describes the service characteristics for each route. Route 10 is one of the most heavily patronized routes in the CPTA system. The eastern terminus is at the Kapok Tree and the western termlnus is beyond the study area on Clearwater Beach. During the 31-14 590-298.04 METR03:C II I I I I I I' I I I I I I I' I I I I I r 9UMET POI\IIT Ill) DREW ". eu:VEL" folD ". GlI.I'-l1;l- UY BLVD DRUIO IlO. folURSEfIY R 0 c " "''''N !IT ENTEm'RlSE RD .. '" '" .. ... ~ OLD TAWPA BAY LEGEND Ii! ~ ~ <0 AREA OF DEFICIENCY ,ftTI_CTIOIf ~ A~T!ItMOOM I'!AK HOUR L! VEL O~ UI!V I CE 'NTElleECTIOII _'NG/AFTERIlOON I'!AK NOUIl L EVE L OF UI!VI CE 'i! III '" :z: u ..J ... .. ~LY Llfolll Ll!V[L Ol' SERVICE ... .. Y R BLVD o 1/4 1/2 SCALE IN MILES 1982 TRAFFIC LEVELS-OF-SERVICE EXHIBIT 31-5 II I I I' I I ,I I I I I I I I I I I I I I su..sn POI..T ~O O~ EW ST CUVELAOlO ST MAl N 5T VIRGINIA ST OIMO RO GUlF- TO - BAY BLVD --- --- "URSE~Y 1'10 .__1_1_._' ALLEN AVE ~.".~~ ~.. ,$I llil't"~ f: "TE~PRISE 1'10 - ~ ",.o ~ i!:'! = ::l: =': :r0- o..:: ,~ ..' " .... " i c II; \\ ~i 1- III!! ~ 1- I~ I- ii! "'''iN ST "..... ..........I:! 8lI ~ 1- ;; i""'. :~ O.o Iii :il! I..; .r.;;;::,.. = L&1JI\L1~~,,=~IIIiU..""1I ~.I. . I I ._~ . (' .., , II ---J .1 II .of ."ULF TO' B<l.Y BLVD - 1III.oA'II'IIl'I- r '" '" " ~ "' OJ '" :=: "' "' -' :l <.> ~ ;z: ., .... .... DREW ST ,>, 1- I I I -'"l . I I .. NURSER. ,FlIl.. _ I' OLO TAMPA BAY . _. .If}~I~'R. . c II; '" :>; '" "' '" E BAY OR _1_,___1- &1 HAONES BAY SHORE 1'10 ~ !lOUTE NO 10 15 I~ 19 ---.....-,.,.--- ROUTE LOCATIOH ~ :I: <.> .: '" ,.- -.. --.-..-..-.-.-. III.III.UIIU................. RDQSEVEL T BLVD D 1/4 1/2 SC"LE oOl MilES CPT A STUDY AREA ROUTES EXHIBIT 31-6 II I Ol C III "...... \Il ... ~ \Il CU ~ :J C ::E I VI :J 0 0 o::t" ..... 0 N :J Cl ::!: ... a... c::I ..o.J CU U U '+- +oJ.... CU o .... '+- ~ I V) '+- .... ~ I'llC CU OJ ~ .oC~.c E.... ..o.J ::E :JVI':'::O o::t" 1""1 0 ..... z: \Il I'll c::I <C I I'llCU_ a... a... ~~ ~ VI I" I'll VI III III ): ~ I'll $... $... $... "OC"O :J :J :J <: I'll QJ.... 0 0 0 ....... QI..::.l,.... :::t: :J: :::t: z: ::l:CUO I Q/::!: r-I N N CU3 \Il +oJ U I'll .... E ~ \Il III ..o.J .... C $... ~ $... \Il X .... :J :J :J I .... 0 :E: 0 0 0 $... $... :::t: :J: :J: QJ 0 +oJ ('f) r-t N N U <C I'll $... I ItI ..r::. U ::E :E ::E ::E ('f) QJ I QJ U ex: a... Cl- a... r-t U QJ.,... Ul ('f) .... U>'O 0 t.n 0 0 I > .... $... c: 0 o::t" 0 ('f) QJ $... >QJUJ ,.... QJ $...V'1 0 \D t.n l.t1 ..0 Vl QJ ..... I'll Vl ~ I'll QJ '+- I $... o ~ ::E ::E ::E ::E <C IV VlUVl <: <C <C <C ~ 111.... c: '0 E >.... 0 t.n 0 0 :J .... $... 0 r-l 0 ('f) I +I ~QJCU .. VI Vlc::l \D r-. 0 CO r-I <C ~ a... u ..::.l ..::.l ..::.l +I I .....IV 41 QJ CU m o u Ql QJ Q,l Vl .... 3: ~ ~ I \Il > ~~ ,.... .- ,.... c: m CU ,.... ,.... ,.... 0 C Vl <C .ex; .ex; :::E I .c ,.... $... U ,.... .-0 ,.... ..... ltl III ,.... ..0 ,.... ,.... C Q,l Q,l O::E III $... m,.... I ..... a:l Q,l +J ::E1ll ::E1ll ,....e $... Q,l :J: ::E III $... ~I- $...'0 $... s.. s.. Q,l IV cu..... QJ>. QJC <1l1- +oJ':':: +Jill +I +oJ ..o.JO C ltl 0 I'll>. m <1l lOa. I QJ CU ~a. ~Z ):..... ~ ~ Cl+oJ to. m $... I'll :J m::.t:: I'll c: I'll V) "'I- 0 11I <1l :J eLl QJ c:: ..... 0 ....0 .-0 ..... 0 UI- UU U..o.J U+oJ I ..., to. ('f) QI 0 ..0 0 ('f) t.n Q"I ~ E l""I r-l ,..; r-l l- I :J lJJ Z :::E I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I weekdays, it operates on 30 minute headways, with four buses passing the site on Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard during the morning and afternoon peak traffi c hours. Duri ng the wi nter months when patronage is highest, ridership approaches the seating capacity during peak periods. This condition is defined as operating in level-of- service "C" by the Interim Material on Highway Capacity Transporta- tion Research Circular Number 212. During typical months, the peak transit ridership is generally less than one-half of the seated capacity, or level-of-service "A". A second route in the study area serving east-west travel needs is Route 13. This route has one terminus at Countrys i de Mall , and extends southward down U.S. 19 to Belleair Road before turning west into Clearwater. This route generally experiences ridership less than one-half of the capacity, or level-of-service "A". Headways for Route 13 are one hour on weekdays, with one bus passing the site in the morning and again in the afternoon peak hour. Route 15 travels from Clearwater Mall to Countryside Mall and Safety Harbor. Transit service along this route is within level-of-service "A". Headways on Route 15 are at two hour interval s wi th no buses presently passing the project site during either morning or evening peak travel hours. The final CPTA route to pass within the study area, Route No. 19, travels from Clearwater Mall to Tarpon Mall. Headways along this route are generally two hours. In the morning peak hour one bus 31-18 METR03:C 590-298.04 I' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I passes the development location, whlle in the afternoon, service is increased and two buses pass the project site. As in most of the others, this route operates within level-of-service IIAII. Programmed Transportation Improvements Transportation planning officials from City of Clearwater, Pinellas County, and Flori da Department of Transportation were contacted concerning the programmed transportation improvements within the study area. All agencies indicated no significant projects were currently funded; however, long range transportation improvements are planned beyond the yearly budgeted programs. Table 31-4 identi- fies a number of grade separations and highway widenings in the study area planned by the Ci ty, the County and the State wi thi n thi s decade. 31-19 METR03:C 590-298.04 I' '- e: Qj 0 +-I I .,.. l'll +-I \,C \,C ,.... IJ") ~ U Qj 00 00 00 00 00 ::l+-l 0'\ I I I '- I I '- l'll 00 IJ") IJ") \,C 0 ~ t"'l +-10 0'\ 00 00 00 00 00 III ~ 0'\ 0'\ 0'\ 00 0'\ 0'\ I e: ~ ~ r-I 00 r-I r-I 0 0'\ U r-I e: 0 I .,.. IJ") t"'l t"'l IJ") t"'l \,C t"'l ~ +-I Qj 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 3'", +-I I I I I I I I I Ollll'll ~ N N ~ N IJ") N t"'l ee:: .,.. 0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ::l 0'\ 0'\ 0'\ 0'\ 0'\ 0'\ 0'\ 0'\ IJ ~ r-I r-I r-I r-I ~ r-I ~ I U ~ 01 I e: .,.. ~ 0 1:1 1:1 r- l'll l'll III III III III Ill,.... III 0 0 Qj Qj Qj Qj Qj l'll Qj '- '- e: I e: e: e: e: e: e: 0 l'll l'll l'll l'll l'll e: l'll Qj 1:1 .,.. e: ,... ,... r- ,... ,...01 e: e: +-l 0 .,.. 1:1 l'll l'll l'll E .,.. \,C \,C ~ ~ ~IIlQj ~ ,.... ,... +-I l'll +-I e: e: Qj1:l '- '- 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 1:1 .,.. 0 N N 0 I 01 .,.. +-I +-I .,.. .,.. +-I +-l +-I > +-I 0. 0 '- +-I +-I ~.,.. ~ ~ III '- U ~ ~ l'll l'll N N N+-I1:I N Qj Qj e: 0. III '- '- .,.. e: e: l'll Qj E E l'll l'll E E E ~ Qj E '- +-l 0 0 0 0. 0. 0 0 0 e: 0 +-I +-I l- I e: '- '- Qj Qj '- '- '- .~ l'll '- U U Qj +-l '+- '+- III V) '+- '+- '+-1:Ir- '+- ::l ::l '+- E U Qj '- '- 0 ~ Qj Qj e: e: Qj Qj e: e: e:1:I\,C e: +-I +-I I > Qj Qj 1:1 1:1 Qj Qj Qj.,.. Qj III III +-I r-I 0 0 1:1 1:1 l'll l'll 1:1 1:1 1:1>'- 1:1 e: e: e: t"'l '- '- .,.. .,.. '- '- .,.. .,.. .,...,.. 0 .,.. 0 0 Qj I 0. 0. 3 3 CJ CJ 3 3 31:1'+- 3 U U E Qj E +-I ,... - '- +-I .0 l'll e: l'll e: o.Qj I- 0 I Qj E .,.. '+-1:1 0+-1 I +-I r- ee:: '- l'll 1:1 ::l l'll l'll +-I 1:1 Qj ee:: CJ+-I 1:1 1:10. '- ee:: 0 1:1 e: e: .,.. Qj 0 +-I +-lQj .,.. Qj e:.,.. e:o l'll '-0 0. e:~ r-'- III e: Qj 0 QjOO 0'\ 0 III Qj+-l Qj 0 ~ Qj e: Qjo. QjIJ") r-I e: ,...01 I e: Qj 0 1:1 >~ Qj Qj ~ ~ 0 u.e: l'll ~ 0 ee:: Qj III +-l ~ Qj +-l+-l +-lee:: +-I .,.. '- +-lCD III >I e: ~ Qj Qj QjV) V) 0. ~ '- I- Qj I +-I o l'll ::l e: +-l0'\ .0 III .0 E E Qj .oe: e: OCD 0 Qj Qj~ e: 1:1 ::) l'll l'll Qj Qj .,.. ee:: U Qj .0 .~ ::l e: ~ '- e: I .~ ,.... 0 III 0 ~ . V) .l'll e: 01'", . ,.... 0. '+- Qj '+-00 +-I . ~ V) 1:1 1:1 Qj e:1:I o 01 e: 1:1::1 o e: 01J") Qj . . ee::1:I ee:: Qj Qjee:: '- e: 0 >::E +-I .,.. .0 1:1 ::) e: 1:1 ~ Qj 0. UJ ,....U Qj ~ l'll ~ee:: 1:1 ee:: ~l'll ~ee:: +-11:1 ~~ +-l CD::E III +-I~ +-IV) .~ ee:: 1:1 +-l +-I Qjee:: +-1+-1 +-I U l'll e: ::I ::I +-I e: 0 0+-1 .0 Qj 0 e:.,.. I U >11:1 ::I Qj O'+- O'+- 1:1'- e: l'll 01:1 o e: '- .00 Qj,+- 0 l'll e: V) 1:1 V)o V)o ee:: Qj .,.. m> CD .,... .. Qj CD E'+- ....l CDl'll .,.. ~ 0 I r- I 0 .~ .. I Qj l'll I .. III ..~ ..~ '- U 0.1:1 e:CD e:o. 1:IU .e: > '- +-l 00'\ 0'\>1 0'\+-1 0'\+-1 .,.. r- ee:: Qj Qj ee:: ,.... +-I Qj 01- U +-Ir-I r-I'- r-I '- r-I '- l'll Qj +-I "">1 ,...+-1 Qj V) ,... '- Qj I +-I 0 0 QjCD Qj Qj r-l'll ,.... Qj 1:1 CD ,... 0.'- I '+- .e: .z .z ,... III e: ::lCD ::l III .,.. ~ ::I E Qj 0 ,... V) v)::I V) V) ,... 1:1 e: Qj ::E I ::E e: ::11:1 Qj::E -+-I '- ::l .0 .0 . 0 Qj e: ::l Qj U 0 U ::I '- e: '- U l'll 0. CJ::) ::)U ::)+-l ::)+-1 CDl'll V)~ ::E+-l ::EV) Ol'll O::E g f .,.. l'll +-I Qj I l'll,... +-IU '- '- '- Qj Qj O'+- +-I +-l 0.0 ~ >I >I ~ l'll l'll III +-I +-l ~ ~ e: >I I e: e: e: e: '- '- l'll+-l ::I ::I ::I ::I l'll l'll ,-.,... Qj 0 0 0 0 Qj Qj I-U ,... U U U U ,.... ,.... .0 U U .,... III III III III ~ I III U l'll l'll l'll l'll '+- '+- III e: e: ,... r- ,... ,.... 0 0 Qj M o Qj ,.... r- ,.... ,... U 0 0. l- I- l- I- Qj Qj Qj Qj >I ~ '- ee:: 1Il~ 0 0 0 0 e: e: e: e: +-l ::I I- Qj 0 0 0 0 .,... .,... .,.. .,... .,.. .,... 0 UJ ee:: u. u. u. U. 0. 0. 0. 0. U U V) ~ I I I I I I ,I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 8. PROVIDE A PROJECTION OF TRAFFIC NOT GENERATED BY THIS DEVELOPMENT, ON THE HIGHWAY NETWORK WITHIN THE PRIMARY IMPACT AREA AT THE END OF EACH PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT. TAMPA BAY REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION (1) PROVIDE A PROJECTION OF PERSON TRIPS NOT GENERATED BY THIS DEVELOPMENT ON THE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK (INCLUDING THROUGH TRIPS) WITHIN THE INTERNAL TRANSPORTATION NETWORK OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT AS WELL AS THE PRIMARY IMPACT AREA AT THE END OF EACH PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT. STATE ALL STANDARDS AND ASSUMPTIONS USED, INCLUDING TRIP GENERATION RATES BY LAND USE) TYPES, MODAL SPLIT, PERSONS PER VEHICLE, ETC. Development Within the Study Area Conversations with local planning and permitting officials indicate only one potential development within the site environs. A mobile home park is currently planned for a 100 acre site east of Hampton Road and north of S.R. 60. Maximum development of this tract shows 649 mobil e home si tes to be developed over a peri od of years. At the present time, fi na 1 approval of thi s development has not been granted. Potential person-trips and vehicle-trips to and from the mobile home park site were estimated based upon translt usage and vehlcle occupancy in the region. Percentages of daily trips occurring during the peak hour were also estimated, in order to project peak hour trl p characteri st i cs. Table 31-5 identifles the trip generation assumptions used Based upon the i dent ifi ed trl p generat 1 on assumptions, daily and peak hour tri ps were ca 1 cu 1 ated fo r a comp 1 ete bu il dout of the 31-21 METR03:M 590-298.04 I' V) LL... c... 0- 0::: UJI- t.:; I <:cO IN I-Z Z~ CO wo ::.::: UaJ <:c 0:::1- w w~ I c.. 0..0 ::E LL...v) Z c.. 00.. I 0 - - W 0:: I- e"t- 0.. <C l/') ::L 1-0 ~ ZZ M V) w~ .-l I V) wO <C 0:: CO WZ 0 c..._ Z w I c.. V) - LL...c.. 0:: 0- I- 0:: wI- ...J e" <C <CO 0 I V) Z I-Z Z 0:: Z~ o:t 0 w WO .-l - I- ::.::: wee l- X <C 0::1- 0.. w W W~ ::E c.. 0....0 I ~ Vl Vl ::E: < . LL... Vl < 00... Z - I 0 W 0:: - t.:;1- I- c:C 0 c:C I-C Ln 0:: ZZ M I W W~ .-l Z WO I M W .cz::CO e" wz I.LJ c.. _ ...J 0.... a:I - < 0:: l- I- I W ::.:: >- ...J a::: WUVl(,) c:C ...JZZ_ l/') c.. Uc:CO:I: C\I _c..VlW W :I:~O::> ..... I ::E: WUW 0 >Uc..o:: :I: O-W c.. W ...J I - CO l- I- 0 Z e" _ ::E: W Z Vl ~ U -Z a::: Vlc:C W ~.cz:: I c.. I- 0::: ...J W c:CZa.. I >-ZO I- 0 ...J.cz::VlV)_ _UJo:::a..Z r-t c:CI-W_~ CZa..o:: - l- I .cz:: ...J W <Zo.... >-20 t- O ...JO::VlV)_ I _WO::a..% " <t-UJ-~ cxc....a::: UJ t- o:: W Z I Zc.. >-0 t- O M ...JV)V)_ 0 _0:: 0... Z CO 0:: c:CWI-I~ I- Co...o:: W t- E I I' I, I I I I- I I I I I I I I I I I I I mobl1e home park. The vehicle trips generated for dally and tYPlcal peak peri ods are shown in Table 31-6. These values concur wi th average trip generation rates publlshed by the Institute of Transportatlon Engineer1s Trip Generation Handbook 649 TABLE 31-6 MOBILE HOME PARK TRIP GENERATION DAILY VEHICLE A M. PEAK TRIP ENDS IN OUT 3,490 50 245 P M IN 240 PEAK OUT NUMBER OF TOTAL UNITS 140 General Traffic Growth A number of continuous traffic count stations are malntained by the Florlda Department of Transportation within the defined transportat i on impact area. Over the past 10 years, these count stations recorded an average 6.2 percent annual growth rate. Assum- ing this trend would continue, future traffic volumes were calculated for 1985 (Phase I completion), 1988 (Phase II completion), and 1991 (Phase III completlon). The average daily traffic volumes for each of these years are shown in Exhibits 31-7, 31-8, and 31-9. By comparing these dally traffic volumes with the existing volumes, it can be seen that the lncreases in traffic volumes are sizeable. The potentlal mobile home park would most likely be developed in a number of phases over a period of years. Under this assumptlon, it can be determined that the new traffic generated would be minor in comparison to the assumed background trafflC growth. Therefore, the 31-23 METR03:M 590-298.04 J I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .1 ~ SUlIsr:T POINT DREW ST CLEVELAND ST GlJJ'- TO - BAY BLVD ORUID All NURSERY RO 2',980 ALLEN AVE 18, 110 B,Z'O RD 4,370 ~ ~ >< Q. 19,720 OLD TAMPA BAY BELLE AIR RO 16,~ 33,340 HAINIS ~ "UHORE RO ~ , o II: !l! ... ... " II: ... J: u ...J ... lD BAY DR 41,970 41;370 o 1/4 1/2 SCALE IN MILES 1985 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES EXHIBIT 31-7 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I' I I I I l MAl N ST CRUID AD RD ,. . " 0.. SUHSET POINT AD DREW ST CLEVELAND ST OllJ- TO - BAY BLVD 21,100 OlO TAMPA BAY NURSERY RD Il,feo 31,100 HAINES IAYSHORE RD Ii! \oj Z \oj \oj '" .. .. :z: u J \oj CD 41,520 51,150 o 1/4 1/2 SCALE IN MILES 1988 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES EXHIBIT 31-8 II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I proposed moblle home park generated trafflc was assumed to be incorporated wlthin the background trafflc growth shown in Exhlblts 31-7, 31~8 and 31-9. C. PROVIDE A PROJECTION OF VEHICLE TRI PS EXPECTED TO BE GENERATED BY THIS DEVELOPMENT AT THE END OF EACH PAHSE OF DEVELOPMENT, STATE ALL STANDARDS AND ASSUMPTIONS USED, INCLUDING TRI P GENERATION RATES BY LAND USE TYPES, MODAL SPLIT, PERSONS PER VEHICLE, ETC. TAMPA BAY REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION (1) ANSWER QUESTION C IN THE ADA, ON THE BASIS OF PERSON TRIPS RATHER THAN VEHICLE TRIPS. The deve 1 opment of 1. 5 mi 11 i on square feet of off ice and 460,000 square feet of commercla1 floor space would generate a signlficant number of trip productions and attractions. Table 31-7 identifies a number of trip generation assumptions based upon the two predominant land uses proposed ln the Metro Project. Trips to and from the office floor space are categorized by employees and visitors Likewise, the commerclal floor space would attract trips of both employees and shoppers The person trips per 1000 square feet of floor space were estimated by projecting the number of persons travellng per day to office and commercial bui 1 di ngs, assumi ng a standard absenteei sm rate. The person trip ends per 1000 square feet were subsequently divided into lnternal and external person trips. Employee internal person trips would include miscellaneous shopping and eating trips which would be satisfied whl1e the external trips to the site would be work 31-27 METR03:M 590-298.04 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .1 ,.. I P"4 '" '" ~ III < I- '" Z o - I- ... X ;I '" '" < Z o - I- ~ ... Z ... (,:I '" ... - a: I- '" U =s ... ..: a: < ... ... c.:l < 0 I- Z'" Z ;I... LUU.O..... uoeca: ":Cll: 1-1- <... ;I ...... 0 ... UJ :Ec.:l < 0 "'1- Z'" Z ;I'" I.W~C"" UOIllCl: CI: ZI- ... - '" ... s ... ::;: ~ 0 :E I- Z'" ;I Z ;I... V) u."LL.O'" '" UOIllCl: <..:a: 1-1- <... ;I 0...... 0 Z'" UJ UJ :Ec.:l - < 0 CI:<I- Z'" I- Z ;I... ""......0.... ~ UOIlla: < CI: ZI- Z '" _ a: ... ... l- X UJ >-CI: U ... :i"'~ ..."'u ;lZ- UO: U '" UJ OCl:> '" ... -- ... c.:l < I- 1-(,:1- ZZ'" UJ_~ u'" a:;I '" I- ... CIl: . ~"'I- ~"'Y- CIl: '" "'0 1-%'" Z'" _ 0 ...0 -0 Cl:P"4 I- a: I- ~"'Y- <... Z CIl:'" "'0'" I-Z X'" 0 '" 0 ...0 _P"4 a: I- %1lI: . 0...1- "''''Y- co: ... '" ...Cl z'" >-... ~ 0 _"'0 <-0 ClmP"4 I- I- % ... M'" ~ ... 00 . ~Ol- OY- >-P"4 ~ _Ill: <"'''' 0'" ... U - Y- Y- O <:I <:I II) II) '" o II) o \Q o '" '" '" P"4 Cl II) on N 1ft. '" P"4 Cl on \Q N P"4 Cl ,.. Cl II) II> ill ill ~ i ... o P"4 Cl . o Cl P"4 N .... Cl Cl II) o o N Cl Cl Cl P"4 II> '" o ... - III ;; ~ < - U co: '" t <:I U o <:I II) ,.. o II) on \Q o II) II) P"4 o II) Cl '" '" P"4 .,., P"4 o iii Cl ...; .,., o o '" P"4 II) N o ,.. II) Cl 0 '" 0 ,.. o ,.. o o P"4 P"4 Cl II) '" II> ill ill ~ i '" II> '" ill Cl. Cl. o .I:. '" o ... o CI: I- ~ II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I related. Shoppers to the commerclal floor space would be primarlly externa 1 but wou 1 d i nc 1 ude other i nte rna 1 t ri ps by vis it i ng other business establishments wlthln the project site PubllC transportation ln the study area would capture a percentage of the person trlps entering and eXltlng the slte. It 15 estimated that flve percent of all employee person trips would use transit, while one percent of the shoppers would patronlze transit. Person trlps not utilizing transit would travel by private automo- bile. It is estlmated that 1.2 persons would be accommodated per vehlcle entering or exiting the site for all work or business-related trlps. Due to the dlfferent trip nature of shopping, approximately 1.5 persons would be anticlpated per shopping vehicle. The percentages of dally trlps entering and exiting the Slte durlng the mormng and afternoon peak hours were also estlmated in Table 31-7. These ratlos were based upon actual counts taken from other office and retail developments. Person Trips Person trips generated by the Metro Development for each phase are shown in Table 31-8. The planned square footage built per phase was applled to the assumptions in Table 31-7 to arrive at these totals. Total person trlps in thls table are broken down into daily and peak hour. and categorlzed by those contributed by retail and office land uses These figures include both internal and external person trips. 31-29 METR03:M 590-298.04 II I I I I I I I 'I I I I I I I I I I I TABLE 31-8 PERSON-TRIP GENERATION BY DEVELOPMENT PHASE (Internal and External Person Trlps) A.M. PEAK P.M. PEAK DAILY PERSON HOUR HOUR PHASE I TRIP ENDS IN OUT IN OUT 100,000 Sq. Ft. Reta i 1 7,300 110 60 235 250 435,000 Sq. Ft. Office 8,050 1,200 230 180 900 15,350 1,310 290 415 1,150 PHASE II 260,000 Sq. Ft. Reta i 1 19,980 295 155 610 660 980,000 Sq. Ft. Office 18 , 130 2,715 520 405 2..020 38,110 1,010 675 1,015 2,680 PHASE I II 460,000 Sq. Ft. Retail 33,580 520 275 1,080 1,165 1,500,000 Sq. Ft. Offi ce 27,750 4,145 795 ~ 3,095 61,330 4,665 1,070 1,700 4,260 METR03:P 31-30 'I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Vehlcle Trlps Vehlcle trlps generated by each development phase are shown ln Table 31-9 Daily and peak hour volumes to and from the site were calcula- ted by multiplYlng the square footage for each development phase by the vehicle trlp characteristics identified in Table 31-7. During the initial development phase. 9,210 daily trlp ends would be gener- ated, with 22,090 and 36,210 daily trip ends generated at the ends of the second and thlrd phases, respectively. A trlp end is defined as a trlp either beginning or ending at the slte For example, under Phase I 4,605 vehlcles tnps would be attracted to the site and 4,605 vehicles would leave the site per day. The morning and afternoon peak hour traffic volumes generated by the site are also calculated by multiplying the estimated trip rates by the square footage constructed durlng each phase. These volumes are shown by vehicles inbound and outbound for each phase in Table 31-9 The identified trip generatlon assumptions can be converted to vehicle trip ends per 1000 square feet for both office and commercial space. For offi ce, a rate of 12. 3 t ri p ends per 1000 square feet was calculated This rate concurs with average trip ends generated by office developments as documented by the Institute of Transport- atlon Engineers Trip Generatlon Handbook. The vehicle trip rate for commercial land use totaled 38.6 trip ends per 1000 square feet. This figure matched the Florida Department of Transportatlon's Trip Generation Research for average retail under similar conditions. 31-31 METR03.M 590-298.04 II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TABLE 31-9 VEHICLE TRIP GENERATION (Cumulative) A.M PEAK P.M PEAK DAILY VEHICLE HOUR HOUR PHASE I TRIP ENDS IN OUT IN OUT 100,000 Sq. Ft. Retall 3,860 60 30 120 130 435,000 Sq Ft Office 5,350 810 150 120 590 9,210 870 180 240 720 PHASE II 260,000 Sq. Ft Retal1 10,040 170 90 320 340 980,000 Sq Ft Office 12,050 1.820 340 260 1,330 22,090 1,990 430 580 1,670 PHASE III 460,000 Sq. Ft. Retail 17,760 300 160 580 600 1,500,000 Sq. Ft. Offlce 18,450 2,790 520 400 2,040 36,210 3,090 680 980 2,640 METR03'Q 31-32 II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Translt Trlps Estlmates of the number of people using public transportation were calculated uSlng the trip generatlon assumptions in Table 31-7 and the project phasing schedule. Table 31-10 identifies the daily and peak hour person trlps proJected to use pUblic transportation. During the initial phase of Park Place, approximately 180 people would rlde the bus to the slte, and 180 people would exit the site, total ing 360 trip ends Approximately 840 and 1,330 daily transit t rl p ends wou 1 d be ant 1 Cl pated 1 n the second and thnd phases, respect i ve 1 y. Percentages of the daily t rl ps occurrl ng duri ng the peak hour were used to determine the peak hour transit trlps. These peak hour person trlps are shown in Table 31-10. D. ESTIMATE THE INTERNAL/EXTERNAL SPLIT FOR THE GENERATED TRIPS AT THE END OF EACH PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT AS SHOWN IN (C) ABOVE. USE THE FORMAT BELOW AND INCLUDE A DISCUSSION OF WHAT ASPECTS OF THE DEVELOP- MENT (I.E , PROVISION OF ON-SITE SHOPPING AND RECREATION FACILITIES, ON-SITE EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES, ETC.) WILL ACCOUNT FOR THIS INTER- NAL/EXTERNAL SPLIT TAMPA BAY REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION (1) ESTIMATE THE INTERNAL/EXTERNAL SPLIT FOR THE GENERATEO TRIPS AT THE END OF EACH PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT AS SHOWN IN (C) ABOVE. USE THE FORMAT BELOW AND INCLUDE A DISCUSSION OF WHAT ASPECTS OF THE DEVEL- OPMENT (I.E., PROVISION OF ON-SITE SHOPPING AND RECREATION FACILI- TIES, ON-SITE EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES, ETC.) WILL ACCOUNT FOR THIS INTERNAL/EXTERNAL SPLIT. As lndlcated in the previous section, a number of internal trips are generated by Park Pace. The majority of the internal trlps would consist of site employees eatlng or shopping ln the commerclal area of the development and shoppers vislting the site for one particular 31-33 METR03:M 590-298 04 ~I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ,I TABLE 31-10 TRANSIT TRIP GENERATION (PERSON TRIPS) A. M. PEAK P.M. PEAK DAILY PERSON HOUR HOUR PHASE I TRIP ENDS IN OUT IN OUT 100,000 Sq. Ft. Retal1 70 0 0 5 5 435,000 Sq. Ft. Offl ce 290 45 10 5 35 360 45 10 10 40 PHASE II 260,000 Sq. Ft. Reta i 1 180 0 0 5 5 980,000 Sq. Ft. Offlce 660 110 20 15 80 840 110 20 20 85 PHASE II I 460,000 Sq. Ft. Retail 320 5 0 10 10 1,500,000 Sq. Ft. Office 1,010 160 30 25 125 1,330 165 30 35 135 METR03:R 31-34 II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I METR03:M retall need, but maklng additlonal trlps to other commerclal areas The estlmates of each of these lnternal trips per 1000 square feet were shown in Table 31-7 (Section C) The proposed site plan lndicates that the majority of the commercial floor area would be located in the central area of the development slte Due to the relatlve compactness of the slte and the central locatlon of the commercial areas within the site, all development tracts cou 1 d be reached Wl th in acceptab 1 e walking di stances (1 es s than 1800 feet). Therefore, it is assumed that all internal trips would be accommodated by the walk mode. Table 31-11 identlfies the assumed internal-external vehicle split TABLE 31-11 EXTERNAL/INTERNAL SPLIT FOR VEHICLE TRIPS VEHICLE TRIPS (ADT) PHASE EXTERNAL INTERNAL PEAK HOUR VEHICLE TRIPS EXTERNAL INTERNAL A.M. P.M. AMP M. Phase 1 9,210 2 22,090 3 36,210 1,050 2,420 3,770 o o o 960 2,250 3,620 o o o o o o E. USING MAP J AS A BASE, ASSIGN THE TRIPS GENERATED BY THIS DEVELOPMENT AS SHOWN IN (C) ABOVE AND SHOW SEPARATELY THE TRAFFIC NOT GENERATED BY THIS DEVELOPMENT AS SHOWN IN (B) ABOVE TO THE HIGHWAY NETWORK WITHIN THE PRIMARY IMPACT AREA, AND INCLUDE ADT, PEAK-HOUR TRIPS AND DIRECTIONAL TRAFFIC LOAD. IF NECESSARY, PROVIDE A SEPARATE MAP J FOR EACH PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT SHOWING EXPECTED CONDITIONS AT THE END OF EACH PHASE. 31-35 590-298.04 II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I METPO DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC Vehicle Trip Distrlbutlon and Asslqnment The estimated trips generated under each development phase were dlS- trlbuted based upon data used in the Florida Department of Transport- ation areawide transportatlon study. From the baslc dlstributlon calculatlons, vehicle trips were assigned to the surrounding street network us i ng a II most ressonab 1 e" routing techni que. Whe re two or more compet i ng routes were i dent Hi ed, a dive rs 1 on anal ys 1 s was applled to determine the percentage of vehicles to travel each route Exhibit 31-10 ldentifies the results of the traffic distrlbution and assignment analysis. As shown ln the illustration, the traffic would enter and exit the slte in all directlons. Approximately 36 percent of the total trafflc would travel to and from the north. Similarly, traffic to and from the west would total 23 percent while south and east directional splits would equal 18 and 23 percent, respect1Vely. The most heavily used routes would be u.S. 19 and GUlf-to-Bay Boulevard. Vehicle Trip Attenuation - Vehicle trips entering the development would have trip origlns throughout the trafflC impact study area and beyond. Similarly, vehicles eXlting the site would have trip 31-36 METR03:M 590-298.04 I' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .. I SUNSET POINT RD 9"10 -aRt" -$t' I 0 "10 GULF- T +&A't Bl..Vtl: DRUID RD 1% NURSERY RD AN o " ... z ... ... " VIRGINIA T 3"10 MAIN ST 10% ALLEN AVE ENTERPRISE RD ,. ~ " 0.. o " " ... % u g4% ... > .. '" ... .J ::l U " ... % 23"10 OLD TAMPA BAY BELLE AIR RD 2"10 !i! E BAY OR RDOSEVEL T BLVD o 1/4 1/2 SCALE 'N MILES SITE APPROACH DISTRIBUTION EXHIBIT 31-10 II I I I I I- I I I I I I I I I I I I I destinations within the lnfluence area and points beyond. Typically, a large percentage of work and shop purpose trlps have one trip-end, home-based. Due to residential and other land uses within the influence area, a percentage of work and shopping trips would be expected to have trip termini within the influence area. Table 31-12 identifies the estimates of trips attenuated within the influence area. As the table illustrates, within a 2-mile radius of the site, slightly over 4 percent of the shopping trips would be expected to terminate. This is explained by the number of residen- tial developments within the influence area which would produce trips to the site. Within a 2-mile radius, only about 1.5 percent of the work trips would be expected to terminate. This smaller percentage for the same distance (as compared to shop) exemplifies longer work trips being more acceptable to the driver than shop related trips. The vehicle attenuation factors listed in Table 31-12 were applied to the trips generated by Park Place. These factors were taken from regional data used in the Pinellas Area Transportation Study. Transportation Impacts Transportati on impacts from the Metro Development and background traffic growth were identified for Phase I Development (1985), Phase II Development (1988) and Phase III Development (1991). The criteria 31-38 METR03:M 590-298.04 I I I I I I. II ,II I I I II I 'I I 1\ I 'I I TABLE 31-12 VEHICLE TRIP LENGTH FREQUENCY PERCENT OF LENGTH OF LENGTH OF SITE GENERATED SHOP TRIPS OFFICE RELATED TRAFFIC ATTENUATED (MILES) (MILES) 1 1.14 1.10 2 1 35 2.25 3 1. 65 2.60 4 1.95 3.10 5 2.25 3.40 10 2.70 4.50 15 2.08 5.40 20 3.53 6.40 25 3.75 6.90 30 4.20 7.50 35 4.35 8.30 SOURCE: Pinellas Area Transportatlon Study METR03:T 31-39 I ,I 11 I, I I I I I ,; :1 II I 'I . I I III I I,' _ used ln analyzlng the traffic impacts lnclude future year daily and peak hour traffic volumes and levels of serVlce. The translt lmpacts are identlfied by the estimated person trips uSlng each bus route. PHASE I DEVELOPMENT Traffic Conditions Future traffic conditions in the study area were estimated for com- pletion of the initial development phase of the Metro Project. Daily traffic volumes during this time perlod are shown ln Exhibit 31-11. The projected daily traffic volumes are shown by the compon- ents of both the background traffic (assumed to increase by a 6.2 percent annual growth rate) and Phase I generated trafflc. U.S. 19, both north and south of the site. Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard, both east and west of the site, McMullen-Booth Road and Drew Streets are expected to carry the largest percentage of proJect-related traffic. In comparing the background traffic projections in 1985 with existing traffic volumes, the 6.2 percent growth factor provides background traffic volume increases significantly larger than the site generated traffic. Peak hour traffic volumes were also projected for Phase I. Again, the ex is t i ng peak hours turn counts were increased by 6. 2 percent annually to estimate the background traffic in future years. Phase I peak hour traffic volumes were also included in these traffic vo 1 umes. For simp 11 ci ty in present 1 ng th, s materi al, the Phase I peak hour turn counts were combi ned Wl th the background traffi c Exhibit 31-12 identifies the afternoon peak hour turn movements at 31-40 590-298.04 METR03:M If I .1 I I I: I I I I I ,j " '1 I II I, I, I ~ ~ 5~NSl'iT POINT RO 8 @ @ ~9Y ~i PART A PHASE I PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENTS EXHIBIT 31-12 I' I c a: ... z ~ 0 > a: .. r u z .. 0 I" u 8 "- II 0 GIA.F -ll)- eAY 8LVC ~ -' :z: 0 I I I ~- I ~---=-=-= ~ f"''"' ~~ I f/ [ I I t 01.0 TA.."" eAY \ I \ I. ~ I (~ .... ~ ~ I ~ I. ROOSEVELT eLVO I I PART B I PHASE I PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENTS EXHIBIT 31-12 I I' I I. I I I 'II ,I I I I I I' 'I I, 'I I 1\ I completion of Phase I for all major intersections in the study area, and morning movements for three intersectlons adjacent to the slte Peak hour and daily equlvalent levels-of service were calculated for the existing hlghway network. Exhibit 31-13 illustrates the level- of- s ervi ce anti ci pated for each 1 ntersect ion and se 1 ected major 1 inks. As can be seen, four addi t i ona 1 intersections wou 1 d drop below level-of-service "011 durlng the peak hour. These intersections are located at U.S. 19 at Sunset Point, U.S. 19 at Coachman Road. U.S. 19 at Drew Street, and Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard at McMullen-Booth Road. The intersectlons of U.S. 19 at S.R. 580, U.S. 19 at Country- side, U.S. 19 at Roosevelt, Belcher at Sunset Point, and Belcher at Gulf-to-Bay presently operate below acceptable condltions, and would continue to do so under Phase I, assuming no improvements. Transit Conditions Projected transit patronage under Phase I shows approximately 180 people would ride to and from the site throughout the day (See Table 31-10). With the existing CPTA transit ridership trends continuing, these daily trips would not impact the existing levels-of-service on the four routes serv1ng the area. During the peak hours, however, ridership could be affected. Assuming seated capacity presently occurs on Route 10 through the area during peak months (other months are much less) some standing passengers could be experienced. These conditions would be for only short periods, and would only occur on one route. Other routes would be able to absorb the ridership and remain withln current levels-of-service, so that this publicly 31-44 METR03:M 590-298.04 I" o, ,.... ~ I I, I' I 1- 'I' I, I I, I I ,I I 'I' 'I I II I _lET POINT IlO DREW !T C1EVE LA NO !T GII.J' - ltI- 8101' BLVD llIIUlO 110 NU RS[!!1' ~ 0 <> II: MA'N ST ALLEN AVE ENTal"'''' SE R 0 ,.. J: '" "- VIR INI .. :; OlO TAMPA BAY LEGEND ~ 'NTt:I!IICTIOIl - ....UPINOOIl I'UJ( ~ .HOllll LEVU 0.. AUVICE Ii! <@ ~ <(€) AREA OF OEFl CIENCY INTI!RSECTIOIl _'N'/Al"T1IlloIOON P'UK HOUR L O'E L OF UIMCI .. .. II: llAIlT LINK LEVEL 01' URVICI BLVD o 1/4 1/2 st..u: .N IIlU9 PHASE I LEVELS-OF-SERVICE EXHIBIT 31-13 if I I" I .1 I- I I I, I I I I I I I I. I I 5 ubs 1 d lZed ope rat ion would be mo re fu 11 y ut ill zed and ope rat i ng deflcits would decline. PHASE II DEVELOPMENT Traffic Conditions Traffic volumes projected for 1988 would lncrease due to continued background growth as well as increases in Park Place traffic Exhibit 31-14 presents the total daily traffic volumes broken down into background and site-related trafflc. Peak hour turning volumes were calculated by the same procedure used ln Phase I. Exhibit 31-15 identifies the peak hour turning movements at each major intersection under Phase I proj ect ions. The i nter- section locations closest to the facility are most impacted by the development. Leve 1 s-of-servi ce were ca 1 cul ated assumi 09 ex; st i ng highway condi- tlons and Phase II traffic volumes (see Exhibit 31-16). As can be expected, the number of intersections and hi ghway 1; nks opera t i ng below acceptable traffic parameters increase from existing and Phase I conditions. In 1988 when Phase II lS completely developed. 20 out of the 37 intersections analyzed would fall below level-of-service 11011 duri ng the peak hour. 31-46 METR03:M 590-298.04 II .. I 1 I I- I I 'I 'I ,I I I I I I I I I I I I MAl N Sf ~o ~ ~ " "- I~ INI SUNSET POINT lID DREw Sf Ci.CVE ~ANO Sf Gll.F - TO. BAY BLVD DRUID lID OlO TAMPA BAY NU~SE~Y ~D LEGEND Ii!: HAINES BAlSHO~E Ii! ... ... .. "' .. . 3 ... .. AT ~ ao,ug 60,280 o 1/4 1/2 SCALE IN 11I1 LES PHASE II A VERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES EXHIBIT 31-14 II I " 0: 'oJ ~ :::: " '" " 0: 5 0: .. ~ " " I. " 0 :!I ... <IU.F -TO-1lIl' IlL\'O. " 0: I I I ~- I ~~ ::-::::: f"~'" ~ --- ~- I f/ r I I Ole T."I\O BAy I I ",. I ~~ ~ I H"'NES ao_E ~O ""-- I ~OOSEY E l T B~ Ytl I I PART B I PHASE Ii PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENTS EXHIBIT 31-15 I II I I I 1- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SUlIllIIT POINT Rll DREw !IT CLEVE LAND lIT IIU..I'-TO-!.I.l BLVD llRUlD RD NUIlSERY RD Q "' MAIN ST ALLEN IN EN TEM'IllSE RO ,. iI " Il. VI I I ... ::; OLD TAMPA 8.11'( LEGEND i! --<V ~ ~ -=CD .-REA Df DtFICIENCT INURSI!CTION - .-HElUlOON PE.AK If DUll lEVEL 0' IUVICl! I NTIIIlIIlCTI ON 110IIII IN' tAI"Tl!lINOON PU<< NDUIl LEV! I. 0' SlllVlCE: w .. .. ,. "' ... % ~ .. .. OAILY LINK Llvn 01' SEII'YICE BlVO o 1/4 I/l SC ALl I N WILlS PHASE II LEVELS-OF-SERVICE EXHIBIT 31-16 I' I I I I I I I I I I I I 'I, I I I I .1 Transit Conditlons Approxi mate ly 420 people woul d be expected to rl de trans i t to and from the site on a typical weekday under Phase II. During the morning peak hour, 110 people would rlde the bus to the site, while 85 would ride CPTA away from the slte. Route number 10 would attract a large portion of these peak hour trips and would likely experience some standing load during average ridership months. Based upon the trip distrlbution analysis, the other three routes would also capture a percentage of the transit trip, possibly producing some standing situations with the existing capacity. For this phase, either additional peak hour bus service would be required on these routes, or the potential transit ridership capture would not be realized. PHASE III DEVELOPMENT Traffic Conditions Traffic volumes in the flnal phase would continue to lncrease due to background traffic growth and Park Place. By comparing the projected daily background traffic volumes in Phase III (Exhibit 31-17) with the existing volumes (Exhibit 31-2), it is ObVl0US that the 6.2% annua 1 growth facto r produces s i gnifi cant ; ncreases in background traffic. Peak-hour traffic volumes as shown in Exhibit 31-18 al so i nd i cate that s i gni f i cant ; ncreases in background t ra ffi c vo 1 umes continue to occur. Exhibit 31-19 indicates the levels-of-service durlng the peak hour and equi val ent daily volumes on cri t i ca 1 roadway 1 inks. Approx;- 31-51 METR03:M 590-298.04 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .. ! MAIN SI 6,110 i.rr%- ViRGINIA T " a: a: oJ ;J; ~ oJ '" SUN SlOT F'(lIN T RO GlA..F TO BAY PRU 10 RO 13,g~8 13,3110 NUR SERY R 0 NURSERY RO RO HA I tiES BAYSHORE ... z ... oJ .. .. '" ;J; <.> ;;i '" 56, 640 ~ n,:no PHASE III lilLEN AVE ENTERPRISE "0 6,l6~ 6,2iO ,. ~ f ~ ':!: Q .. OLD TAMPA BAY BACMOROUND loOT METRO DAI L.Y TRAFFIC TOTA~ ADI o 1/4 1/2 SCALE IN MIUS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES EXHIBIT 31-17 II I "'" I ~ @ I I I I I '\I~3I" 1'01 NT ~D @> I I @ I I 8 I ! I I I ~ I PART A I PHASE III PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENTS EXHIBIT 31-18 I ,. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I g " 0: ~ ... ! " ~ " > i D f III .. a ~ z w ; 0: of i ::; '" ... " :! " " 0: " ~ " g " 8 GuL, - TO' lAY LYe '" ; ~ '" ...J :z: " 0: '" D ~- ~~ ~ f"''''''' ?'~ f/ 01..0 TAMM BAT ~ ~ ::::,....... '" HAl NES 1lATSMl)ll( !to IlOOSEvEL T BL VO PART B PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENTS EXHIBIT 31-18 J PHASE III -' I I , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SUMan PClNT RO OlIEw ST CL.fVE LA NO S'T Gal' - l1J - BAY 8 LVO lRU 10 RtI NURSE'" RO o '" MAIN ST EJHEJrpR1 SE AD >- ~ '" "- VIA INI .. ::; OLD TAMPA BAY LEGEND Ii! '"<V ~ ~ <!) AA E.o. OF DEFICIENCY INT1!RlECTIOll - ...TlIUlOON ~ IlOUIl Ll VlL 01'" Sl:RVI C! I NTI!IISEC1'10N _I NlI{.o.I'l'EItNOQlII I'!AK II OUA LEVEL OF SlRVI CI! 1i! .. .. .. DAI L Y LI Nil LEVEL 0#' IIRVIClI Y II BLVD o 1/<1 1/2 SCALE iN MILES PHASE III LEVELS-OF-SERVICE EXHIBIT 31-19 II I I I I I' I I I I I I I I I I I I I mate 1 Y 80 percent of the intersections and h, ghway 1 inks ana lyzed woul d be be low 1 eve l-of-servi ce "0". The intersections and certa, n roadway links along U.S. 19. Gulf-to Bay Boulevard, Belcher Road. Drew Street and McMullen-Booth Road contain the prlmary deficlencies. Transit Conditions With complete buildout of the Metro Project. there would be a poten- tial for approximately 660 people to use transit in traveling to or from the site each day. During the morning peak hour, approximately 165 people would be expected to rlde to the site and 30 away from the site. Durl ng the afternoon peak hour, 35 people wou 1 d be ex- pected to travel to the site while 135 would exit. To obtain these potent i a 1 ri dersh i p 1 eve 1 s , an increase in number of buses servi ng the site would be needed. This patronage could not be accommodated in the existing route structure with acceptable service levels. If serv i ce 1 eve 1 s on trans it wou 1 d regu 1 ar ly requ ire standees, the potential rldership capture rate would not be achleved. Elsenhower Elementary Eisenhower Elementary School is currently located to the northeast of the intersection of Drew Street and Hampton Road. Approximately 800 students are enrolled at this school. Aproximately 75 percent of the enrollment walks to school while about 25 percent ride a bus. The school currently begins instruction at 9:15 AM and ends at 3:15 PM. Student walk trips are primarily from the north (via Falrview Avenue) and south (via Hampton Road). Hampton and Drew Streets have sidewalks and are used by the students. Students residing south of 31-56 METR03:M 590-298.04 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard use a pedestrian activated signal at the lntersection of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard and Hampton Road on the trip to schoo 1 . A seco nd street cros 5 i ng is requ 1 red at Drew St reet where the Hampton Road sidewalk ends. The increase ln traffic generated by the site would create addltlonal conflicts for the students walking to and from school. These would occur primarl1y at the Hampton Road at GUlf-to-Bay Boulevard inter- section crossing, and the crossing at Drew Street and Hampton Road. Impact Summary Both traffic and transit condltions surrounding the site would be expected to deteriorate in future years due to background traffic growth and to Park Place traffic. Table 31-13 presents a summary of t ra ffi c cond 1 t ions whi ch can be expected th roughout each phase. EXlsting conditions are also shown in Table 31-13 for reference. Daily traffic on crltical roadway links in the study area is shown ln the upper one-half of the Table. Each daily traffic volume increases over the next 10 years. The bottom of Table 31-13 identi- fles the number of intersections operating in each service level for each time period. With continuous increases in traffic volumes, the number of intersect 10 ns ope rat i ng in 1 eve 1 s-of- serv 1 ce II E" and II FII lncreases by time period. 31-57 METR03: M 590-298.04 f I I H I H H 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,...j N ,...j ,...j en ~I r-.. l.U 0 ,...j 0 o:t 0 ,...j M V'l en r-.. ,...j l.O 0 N oq:; :I: l.O o;t .q en N .q I- e.. ,...j en CTI r-.. N M ,...j I H I H 0 0 0 0 0 0 M ,...j r-.. l.O l.O ~l r-.. l.U M N (Xl M ,...j (Xl M V'l 0 CTI Ll) N r-.. 0 od: .. :!: l.O r-.. r-.. Ll) r-.. l.O I Q. CTI r-.. r-.. l.O ,...j N I - I l.LJ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ID r-.. 0 Ll) M IDI ,.... V) ID ID .q 0 Ll) r-.. ,...j M <( N Ll) M ID 0 l.O Z .. .. >- a.. M ,...j M M o::t 0 0:: r-.. ID ID Ll) ,...j N I c:( ::E ::E M ~ ,...j V) I ,...j l- I M U c:( LU e.. ...J ::E CD H Cl c:C z I I- U .... 0 0 0 0 0 0 (Xl ID ID N IN cYll ,... H ?- M ,...j CTI CTI N M ,...j M l.i.. V'l CD e a:l O'! ,...j M l.i.. .... .. .. e:( X M N ,...j N ,...j ID c:: LU \0 Ll) Ll) o::t ,...j ,...j l- I I I ~ CD U. I e 0 +.I V) I .....l I I+- LU S- S- O'! .... > :I od: CD U C LU U. ell r-t :I LUO .l: Cl .....l :::t: .... .... .... .... .... .... U W W W W Ql Ql .... V'l I+- Z.:.t. > > > > ... > C 't:l Ql 0 0", Ql Ql W Ql Ql Ql I.U I VI ): ..... aJ ::::I H ell .....l .....l ....l .....l ....l .....l N LU ell :I .l: 0'1 1-0.. >- ::E S- S- l+- I+- +.I r-t U C C C C C C ....J ::::l 0 0 0 0 S- l.LJ C ..... .... .... ..... .... ..... od: ....l 0 V) 0 z e l+- '+- +.I +.l C V) a:: 0 C) Cl Cl C) Cl Cl c:c > 0 0 III III l.LJ C C C C C C c I Ql "' .l: ~ l- S- .... ''''' .... .... .... .... c:: t.,) .l: .c: ): Ql +-' Z W +.I +.I +.I +.l +.l +.l LU 1-1 +.l +.l 0 '+- 1-1 +.l lI:l I'll 10 10 "' lO aJ l.i.. S- :I >. ~ 0 0 '+- S- So. So. So. So. S- ::E l.i.. 0 0 10 aJ <0:( Ql Ql QI QI Ql ell ::::l e:( Z VI aJ aJ I +.I LU '-" a. a. a. a. a. a. z cc:: I I C III c:: 0 0 0 0 0 e V) I I- 0'1 0'1 0 0 Ql CU o:(LU .....l r-t r-t +.l +.I .... ): U s.. s.. s.. l- s.. s.. c:C M >- I I .... >-1-1 Ql Ql W ell Ql Ql l- e .....l l+- I+- :I l: c> .c .c ..0 ..0 ..0 .c 0 0::: - Vl V) .... ,.... ::IE: QI ::::10::: E E e E e e l- I- e:( :I :I U s.. 1-l.LJ :I :J :I :I :I :I W I 0 ::::I ::::I Cl Cl ::IE: 0 V'l V) z :z z z z Z ::E I' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I F BASED ON PROJECTED TRIPS AS SHOWN IN (E) ABOVE, WHAT MODIFICATIONS IN THE HIGHWAY NETWORK (INCLUDING INTERS~CTIONS) WILL BE NECESSARY AS A RESULT OF THIS DEVELOPMENT? SPECIFY IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED INI- TIALLY AND AT THE END OF EACH PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT. TAMPA BAY REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION (1) ANSWER QUESTION 31 F ABOVE, ON THE BASIS OF THE ENTIRE TRANSPOR- TATION NETWORK (RATHER THAN JUST THE HIGHWAY NETWORK) INCLUDING INTERSECTIONS AND ACCESS POINTS TO THE DR!. INCLUDE APPROPRIATE MASS TRANSIT CONSIDERATIONS. (2) WHO WILL PAY FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO THE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM SPECIFIED IN QUESTION 31.F. Transportation lmprovements are necessary within the study area to accommodate future traffi c volumes. Improvements were recommended when the traffic levels of service were projected to drop to below 1 eve 1- of- serv 1 ce II 011 duri ng the peak hour. or 1 eve 1- 0 f- serv i ce II C" for average condltlons throughout the day. PHASE I TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS Conditions and ~equirements necessary in 1985, the year Phase I is completed, are listed below. Street Network Improvements Street improvements necessary in the initial development phase consist of extending Drew Street east of the site and upgrading a total of eleven intersections along U.S. 19, Gulf-te-Bay Boulevard and Belcher Road. Exhibit 31-20 describes the locatlon of each recommended hi ghway improvement in Phase 1. The intersect i ens of U.S. 19 at S.R. 580, Countryside, Sunset POlnt, Coachman and 31-59 METR03:M 590-298.04 I I l I MAl N ST I I I SUN8[1' POINT RD I .. ~ 5 ~ ... '" .. x I I DREW ST CLEVELAND ST OUJl"- TO- BAY BLVD I CllUID RD. I NU"SERY RD I BELLEAIR lID I I I I .. '" Ii! HAl NES BAYSHORE RD .. z .. .. '" BAY R I I ENTERPIIlSE RO .. . " ... ~ :I i OlO TAMPA BAY LEGEND t) AT -~ IMnIlllCTlClll ~UTI o IIWlIlIVllIIATIClIl llllll DMW ITIIUT EXTENlIClIl (I LAllElI ROOSEVELT BLVD o 1/4 1/2 SCALE IN MILES PHASE I RECOMMENDED HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENTS I EXHIBIT 31-20 II I I- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Rooseve 1 t woul d operate at low serVl ce 1 eve 1 s under the projected 1985 traffic volumes. Grade separations would be the most favorable means of maintaining proper serVlce at these intersectlons At-grade intersection lmprovements are recommended at SlX additional 1 ntersect ions. The 1 ocat ions of thes e 1 nters ect 1 ons are shown 1 n Exhlbit 31-20. These lmprovements primarily involve adding turn or through lanes at each intersection to increase the vehicle carrying capacity (see Exhibit 31-21). The completion of Drew Street between Hampton Road and Bayshore Boulevard is also recommended during this phase. A two-lane facillty wou 1 d be s uffi ci ent for all deve 1 opment phases. Projected turn 1 ng movements at the Drew Street and McMull en-Booth Road intersection show a two-phase traffic signal would be requlred durlng this devel- opment phase. The north-south and east-west on-site roadways would also be devel- oped during this initial phase. The access points of the north-south street at Drew Street and the east-west street at Hampton Road were also investigated with regard to signal requirements. A two-phased traffic slgnal would be warranted at the intersectlon of the north- south road with Drew Street. The intersection of the east-west street and Hampton Road would not require a traffic slgnal. 31-61 METR03.M 590-298.04 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Jtl~::= ~llr Ur.cIlK" ~ liT luaun PIH lIT IIO.IoQ ~llll~ ~)llIr CiU..,.ta-1II1l.1111W],..ZV~1I"'.I:L!;:I!IK.~ Jll J= ~ !;tIU'-m---U'f~~,..:IOf.ItJI~1 Jjjjl~ =T1mr l~ E I ~ Il.T O~t"'" s!'I'ur J Jll ;==: =:; If ~:C:1.C1l1t1' 1I!QI;l] AT C1111E111 I'rJl:lft ~l~ =+1 'CUIJ' T'IJ~""~ IOlitAV~J:O &f _lIit,It.UIII ~ IfIOA..D ~ PHASE I AT-GRADE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS EXHIBIT 31-21 I' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Eastbound left-turning vehicles would lncrease at the lntersections of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard at the north-south slte road and at Hampton Road. Sufficient vehicle queuing space could be developed at each of these locations with the identlfied intersectlon improvements and proper slgnal phasing. Southbound left-turn traffic from U.S. 19 onto Drew Street would also increase with the proposed development Again, adequate queuing space could be developed at this lntersection durlng the initial development phase. Transit Improvements Transit ridership in the first development phase lS not projected to significantly lmpact the daily or peak hour load capacitles causing the need for addi t i ona 1 buses or routes. However, Wl th Route 10 currently carrying seated capacities during seasonal peak periods, loading factors should be monitored during this phase. Minor routing adjustment should be made to each of the four CPTA routes servi Cl ng the area. It is recommended that each of these routes pass through the development and designate two stops within the site. With the direction these routes travel in the area and the north-south and east-west streets to be developed, these routing changes and bus stops could be made with little modification to the existing schedules. Canopies and curb turning radii improvements will be coordinated with the CPTA. 31-63 METR03:M 590-298.04 It I I- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Pedestrlan Improvements Pedestri an Improvements shoul d be made in the area to serVl ce the Else nhower E 1 eme nta ry Sc hoo 1 These imp rovements wou 1 d pr 1 ma r 1 1 Y co ns 1 s t of a s i dewa 1 k on the no rthern s 1 de of the new Drew Street extens 1 on. Thi s facill ty woul d serve Drew Street for a 5uffl ci ent distance east and west of the school The traffic signal proposed for the intersection of McMullen-Booth Road and Drew Street s hou 1 d be pedes t ri an actuated. Th is would a 11 ow students 1 i vi ng east of McMu 11 en-Booth Road to cro s s th 1 S street safely Crosswal ks should be marked and signed at this intersect 1 on, at the intersection of Drew at Hampton Road and the intersection of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard at Hampton Road These imp roveme nts s hou 1 d occur duri ng the in it 1 a 1 phase of deve 1 opme nt and would be sufficient through buildout of the project. PHASE II TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS Street Network Improvements Levels-of-service calculated for the intersections and street links show that more intersections and the roadway 1 ink of Sunset Po i nt Road would become deflcient during the second phase. Exhibit 31-22 identifies the locatlon of the deficient facilities and the recom- mended treatments. The lntersectlon of Drew Street at the north-south site road, Drew Street at Hampton Road, Drew Street at McMullen-Booth Road and the 31-64 METR03 M 590-298.04 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .. ! M~IN SI ALLEN AVE EN TERPRISE R 0 ,. " " 0. V'RGINIA I " '" ~ I u ~ '" " 0: t- O o '" '" '" ... z .... ..J => :f !i t DREW SI DREW S I CLEVELAND ST GULF TO aAY aLVO DRUID RO NURSERY RO ( l ~ ..::':::, "~ OLD TAMPA eAY LEGEND o AT - 8IWlE lMTElISl!l:TION __EfII[NTl! o llIIADE 'EPAlIAT ION !5lllS OIlE W mtl!:n EX'l'ENlIION 12 LAIC' J . WIOEN no. r. TO .. TItA"IC LAMia SELLE AIR RD <> " " '" "' z "' '" " E SAY OR RoosnEL I aLVO o '/4 1/2 SCALE IN MILES PHASE II RECOMMENDED HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENTS EXHIBIT 31-22 I' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I :1 east-west street at Hampton were all investlgated relatlve to addi- tlonal lmprovements over Phase I requlrements Durlng thlS phase no addltlonal lmprovements were found necessary at each of these lnter- sectlons The aval1abl;11ty of left turn vehicle storage was also i nves t i gated re 1 at lVe to the mo rm ng peak hou r i ngres s demands at Gulf-to-Bay Boul evard at the north- south street intersection and Gu 1 f- to-Bay Bou 1 evard at Hampton Road. Both 0 f these 1 ocat 1 on s wou 1 d requ ire add 1 t i ona 1 storage capaci ty , but could be deve loped with the intersectlon improvements identlfied in Exhiblt 31-23. Transit Improvements The recommended modifications to include transit routes through the proJ ect site s hou 1 d be co nt ; nued duri ng the second phas e. It is antlcipated that additional peak hour buses would pass through the 51 te unde r the second phase. It is est i mated that one add 1 t 1 ona 1 bus ln each direction on a north-south route, and one addltional bus in each dlrectlon on an east-west route should be added during this phase to serVlce the projected increase in riders from this develop- ment. PHASE III TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS Street Network Improvements The street network ; mp rovements under the fi na 1 deve 1 opment phase include additional intersectlon upgradings and street widenlng. Exhibit 31-24 identifles these lmprovements. 31-66 590-298 04 METR03. M ,.. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~Ill:k= J~b Jl\~ ~ ~llr ~llr ;;;;(t ~1!I(IIID,U'"~t'u:urtiIMD g"J;&'t~..~ CULI"~TO MY ~~AItl:! ,I;T ......-" Jll~ ~lljl-:= ~l~ ~Ir ~11111 ==;r- :nu=D11 IIi:IIiD AT ~ IICIiM" U. I.&'!'u.a~ iCiUU'"""ro-MT 1fOl.JUV.um 11.1' -- .... Jilll ~ Jlt- JJk;:: --;:1r ---; )IIr ~11r tu.CIID III!MD A1' N:III' I'I"I:II*t U=" ~It U ....,. IIiOAO GULI"-'fO-U.T ~ M' u:JCttLD .l.vtmlII ~jlt Jml t- ~l~ ={ Ir ==f1m r =ff ~~".'UIJ[a-tft:III!'I' g.-: 1t...., IP.c,..U. .IWG :lULr~1'1t'I~"~1DCh"R1IQM) ~ ~~l ;=:= Jij~ *= ~ =)' ~lr ==T')IIi ~ .-D Il.? -..u.m .-D .a.c:aa IIIIrI&D .a." ~ :IIriI;.C! PHASE II AT-GRADE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS EXHIBIT 31-23 II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .. 1 DREW $T CLE~EL~ NO ST GULF. TO - B~Y BL~O DRUID Rll NURSERV RD M~I N ST ~LLEN AVE ENnRPAI SE RD ,. ~ 0. V'RGINI~ T w ;;: OLD TAMPA BAY NURSERY RD LEGEND o ,l,T -llR.lDl! IIIT!RSrcTION IIlPIIOV!_1ITS o lIII,I,DE UP,I,II.I.TION :Ilill:ll Oil! W STIlUT !XTl!NJION 12 L.I. ME' I . 4 W(DEN FIIOM 2 TO 4 TltM~C LANU .. WIDE N FIIOM 4 TO , TRAFl'1C LANES ~ C 0: ... ~ "' >< E a~Y DR ROOSEVE L T BLVD o '/4 In SCALE IN "'LES PHASE III RECOMMENDED HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENTS EXHIBIT 31-24 ~I I I I I Wlth the contlnued growth of the background trafflC and the proposed deve 1 opme nt comp 1 ete 1 y bu i It, Drew Street, Gu If- to- Bay Bou 1 ev a rd. McMullen-Booth Road and Sunset Point Road should be widened. loca- t ions 0 f the req u ired i nte rsect 1 on improvements are a 1 so shown 1 n Exhlblt 31-24. Exhlbit 31-25 ldentlfies the at-grade intersectlOn lmprovements necessary to lncrease the level-of-servlce at each 1 ntersect 1 on to at 1 east II D" . - I I I j I I I I I I I I I SpeciflC access requirements immediately surrounding and within the site were also i dent Hi ed. Durl ng thi s development phase, traffi c s 1 gna 1 s woul d be requi red at the north-south street 1 ntersect ion wlth Drew Street and the intersection of Drew at McMullen-Booth as i dent 1 fi ed in earl i er phases. The i nterna 1 1 nters ect ions of the eas t-west street and the north- south street s hou 1 d a 1 so have a slgnal in Phase III. The intersectlons of Hampton Road at Drew and Hampton Road at the east-west intersectlon would not reqUlre signals with ultimate development. The left turnlng capacities and queuing space requlrements were also ldentifled for the ultimate development. The east bound left turnlng volumes at the intersection of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard at the north- south site road would require a double left turn configuration, with length adequate to service the eastbound left turn ingress demand in both peak periods. The eastbound left turn demand from Gulf-to-Say Soul evard onto Hampton Road woul d also requi re a double 1 eft turn lane. A storage length of 150 feet at this location would be re- qui red to adequate ly servi ce the morni ng and afternoon peak hour demandS. 31-69 METR03:M 590-298.04 ~I I I I II I II i I II I r" I II I I I ,I II I . J11ll-= Jl~ J~~ -l~ =T'11111 =;'Ir ~~r =;lr e,n.ct!l!;l'I IfO.J\O At ~~:!ln pcnn RDNlo C1W ~ AO:M AT IiI;Jl//~n POZ~ ~ l.I j 19 A- Gul..f-'TO 11,I,1' !lQul..llJAUt i;i\lU' f'CI LIL~ :EICIULlVJ.IIID ~... WL~- Cl..!:...lIli1'......"E.A 1llA1;.... gJll'.'E JJll:= -t~ J~l~ Jl~~ ~1tr <l~ ~ll1r ~~r I , ililLClrP iIQ.,I;j) 11.7 ~ II!OAD I;)tD cn&emIU lIIIliIoD ~'r CO,IrIC~ JIOA[] 1r;l!j l1lIl."t:MItrltlfl'OAO .;;.m..t-t'Q ....1" IIIJUU.V.&J1g ...or .>OUTtl ENTu.tiC,t JJ1Jl~ Jll~ Jlml~ J~~ =;:,iml =fIr =; lllllr ~r ~IIII1QAJJATII:u!II1IT.RZBT O~~II;OAI;Iil.T.DUIII'STRD'f' !J:IIi .,.aT ItAllJ;l 1II:;II;,1UV....1IJI' GlJL..-'T'Oru..'I'l!iOlJ~AJU]A'r~Pf'\J.[J Jll }- -1.~ Jml +- ~~:= ==)'))11 ---"" ~11~r ~r ~ I IIQ.CIID. :KWJ) AT DlIIlJW IIlIJAI;I GI,ILF~ro-u.'! 1KKrt.I'\i',uo AT (lLlll o=-..lIlI!WII ~ I;.!S Ltn'ill;,1I1IJEIII'r1llOA[i GVU&'rQ....,.,-r 'lQULiVA!lO IL" ~1II\.l6LDI BClvTIII IIiO.NI' Jlll.k ~t~ Jl1ll +- ~l L- =-;illr ~111I ~111 ././ :I.IJ,.C'II.~M~JIDAilI G!IU"-TO-IIl.1.Y ~.l't 1l~"''Rl!I1.TI U'II It"'fu.t..t.Pl:IU~ [;;l1LP-m-IIA't 1KMILEV.u.D ~T pl'lIillO"K DOU~AR[J Jllll:= JIll:= Illlt- ++- ~1111r ~]rll 11I1 =={II .K~ ~ liT ~J"!JIfIA.D ~iII~.'I!DUIIII~ LJ'" It I'it IU.Z.. 1LIrL....BICIU IOUIo ~~~"-T~iIiIO.I.D J]l~ N ~ --;111 ~IIIOO'mXlNl.a.'t'IUL.IJI~ PHASE III AT-GRADE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS EXHIBIT 31-25 I I W Transit Improvements Addltlonal CPTA serVlce would be requlred ln the vlcinlty of the slte to service the proJected ridershlp poten- tial Approxlmately two addltional peak hour buses ln each directlon of the east-west oriented routes would be requlred for the estlmated Phase III transit rlders Llkewise an additional two peak hour buses ln each directlon on north-south routes are recommended. Off-peak headways shoul d be reduced on the exist 1 ng routes 1 n the area. This increase ln service would be a stlmulus to dally transit patronage. I I" l ' 'I II I I ,I " -I I I I 'I I 'I I As in the earller development phases translt routes should use the i nte rna 1 roads of the proposed site. Bus s tops with pass i b 1 e bus shelters could be provlded within the site at one or more locatlons to encourage transit use. Development Responsibillty The transportation improvements outlined in thlS report for each development period are a result of traffic from both Park Place and bac kground growth. The anal ys is i nd ; cates that highway f ac 111 ties close to the site would either not become deficlent, or not become deflcient as soon without the proposed development Other facillties located further away from the site have either zero or an lnsignlficant amount of development trafflC; and therefore are projected to become deficlent at approximately the same tlmes shown without the Park Place Development 31-71 METR03:M 590-298 04 )1 II I J ,I I: I ,I I' II 'I I 'I '- ,I 'I II I I ,I, METR03:M The fo 11 OWl ng fac 1 11 t 1 es have a s 1 901 fl cant amount of deve 1 opment- related traffic and would either requlre the lndicated lmprovement to be made, or would be subject to lowered levels-of-serVlce at an earl i er date than woul d occur wi thout the ProJect. Appendl x II I provldes data describing Project's contributlon to intersectlons ln the study area by phase. PHASE I o Construction of Drew Street (2 lanes) between Hampton Street and McMullen-Booth Road. o Install traffic slgnal at intersectlon of North-south site Road and Drew Street. o I nsta 11 pedestr i an activated signa 1 at McMu 11 en- Booth Road at Drew Street Intersection. o Improve Intersection of Drew Street at U.S. 19. o Improve intersect 1 on of Gu1f-to-Bay Boul evard at North-south Sl te Road. o Improve intersectlon of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard at McMullen-Booth Road PHASE II o Construction of Drew Street (2 lanes) between Hampton Street and McMullen-Booth Road. o Install traffic signal at lntersection of North-south slte Road and Drew Street. o Install pedestrian actlvated signal at McMullen-Booth Road at Drew Street intersection. o Grade separate intersectlon of Drew Street at U.S. 19. o Improve 1 ntersecti on of Gul f-to-Bay Boul evard at North-south site Road. o Improve lntersection of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard at U.S. 19. 31-72 590-298.04 I ;1 I I ..I 'I I' i' ,1\ "- ,I 'I I 11\ ,I j I' <" j' II: ,I' o Improve lntersectlon of GUlf-to-Bay Boulevard at Hampton Road. o Improve lntersectlon of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard at McMullen-Booth Road. PHASE II I o Construction of Drew Street (2 lanes) between Hampton Road and McMullen-Booth Road o Wlden Drew Street (from 2 to 4 lanes between Coachman Road and Sl te. o Widen Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard (from 4 to 6 lanes) between U.S 19 and Bayshore Boulevard. o Widen McMullen Booth Road (from 2 to 4 lanes) between Gulf-to- Bay Boulevard and S.R. 588. o Install traffic slgnal at intersectlon of North-south 51te Road and Drew Street. o Install pedestrian activated signal at McMul len-Booth Road at Drew Street intersectlon. o Grade separate intersection of Drew Street at U.S. 19. o Improve intersect 1 on of Gulf-to-Bay Boul evard at North- south site Road. o Improve intersection of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard at U.S. 19. o Improve intersection of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard at Hampton Road. o Improve intersection of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard at McMullen-Booth Road. o Improve lntersection of Clearwater Mall Drlve (west entrance) and Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard. Highway Improvement Scheduling METR03. M The transportatlon lmprovements were ldentified which would be necessary under each development phase. The improvements identlfied were cal cul ated to be the mi nimum necessary under each phase to 1 mprove the 1 eve 1 5- of- s erv ice to the acceptab 1 e s tanda rds. Th is 31-]3 590-298.04 ,I 'I I I ,I 'II \ II' II I I, "I I, I, ,I, ,I, 1, ,I 'I I method was us ed to a 11 ow max 1 mum flex i b 1 " ty 1 n 1 mp roveme nt p ro- grammlng. Realist1cal1y, 1t 1S often more econom1C to fully lmprove a speclflc street or intersection during first phase if addltional 1mprovements will be necessary later on to accommodate the ultlmate development traffic. Upgrad1ng the capaclty of the same segment of hlghway for each phase of development would be more costly and would create add1tlonal construct10n lmpacts. It lS therefore recommended that wherever possible, a highway link or 1ntersectlon be improved to satisfy the ultlmate projected volumes at the flrst opportunity. One of the more lmportant scheduled lmprovements involves the widen- i ng of McMull en-Booth Road from 2 to 4 1 anes Des i gn for thi s proJ ect 1 s near 1 y comp 1 ete , i nc 1 ud i ng road and b rl dge cons t ruct ion plans and ri ght - of-way mapp i ng. The des i gn 1 nc 1 udes p rov is 1 on for eventua 1 add it 1 on of fl fth and s 1 xth 1 anes in the med i an, wi th right-of-way acquisition scheduled for 1982-83. Considering the ability of improvements to McMullen-Booth Road to relieve both background and proJect-related traffic on U. S. 19, it would be des 1 rab 1 e for the app 1 i cant to coord i na te wi th Pine 11 as County on intersection designs in the project viclnity ln order that adequate capaclty be provided when construction is completed. G WHAT STEPS WILL BE TAKEN IN THE PLANNING AND DESIGN OF THE DEVELOP- MENT TO ACCOMMODATE EXISTING AND PROPOSED PUBLIC TRANSIT SYSTEMS? REFER TO INTERNAL DESIGN, SITE PLANNING. PARKING PROVISIONS, LOCA- TION, ETC. WHAT PROVISIONS WILL BE MADE FOR THE MOVEMENT OF PEOPLE BY MEANS OTHER THAN PRIVATE AUTOMOBILE? TAMPA BAY REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 31-74 METR03:M 590-298.04 II I I - .1. I t I 'I' , ,II I' I I I j. f I I I. (1) WHAT STEPS WILL BE TAKEN IN THE PLANNING AND DESIGN OF THE DEVELOP- MENT TO EXPAND EXISTING AND PROPOSED PUBLIC TRANSIT SYSTEMS? ALSO, WHAT FACILITIES, SERVICES, AND/OR CONSTRAINTS WILL BE PROVIDED ON-SITE TO FOSTER UTI LIZATION OF MASS TRANSIT? REFER TO INTERNAL DESIGN, SITE PLANNING, PARKING PROVISIONS, LOCATION, ETC. Public transportation, parklng strategies, pedestrian amenities and other Transportation System Management Techniques could be success- fully employed to transport people to and from the site by means other than the private automobile. The following paragraphs iden- tify potential options under each. Public Transportation As outl ined in section "F" transit routes and schedules should be improved to service the Metro site. Routing of each line which presently passes the slte today could easily be modified to lnclude di rect serVl ce wi thi n the site. It woul d be recommended by the fi na 1 phase that two addi t i ona 1 peak hour buses ope rat i ng in both directions on east-west oriented routes, and two additional peak hour buses in each direction on north-south routes be added. During the off-peak periods, service should be improved (by completion of the final phase) on each of these routes to operate with headways of 30 minutes or less. New route possibilities should be explored to better service the market area of this development. Potential bus service from Clearwater to Tampa should be explored during this development period. 31-75 METR03:M 590-298.04 II I Ii _1 I I '- t I 'I, . r II I' I I 'I. \1 t II }I I DFlfW STREET f" -- =: ----: ...--__.__.._..__... Il 1r _.........___._......... I Ll ~ '" "' '" u ~ !'Ill ~ Ti EAST-WEST -' 5.-___ L '1.1......____ il ~ ~+ rrr ~-?-.- ~ 1 mrr GU.f - TD-RO.Y BOULE\fARI) LEGEND ~ SrGiNAl,. 1...0ClL T 10.'".1 - LANE INDICATION: ~ BuS 'StOP PHASE III SITE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS EXHIBIT 31-26 II I 'I I I , 'I Two bus stops are proposed withln the slte These two, as shown 1n Exhlbit 31-26 would be located on e1ther side of the north-south 51 te road. Mi nor bus s top amen 1 ties, s uc h as benche s, adequate lighting, and bus schedules and shelters could be provlded at each locatlon Cross walk pavement markings should be applied at each stop to alert motorlsts of bus patrons crossing at these locatlons. - , " I. I I I,' I I I" II Pedestrian Amenities Landscaped and 11ghted sidewalks or paths should be provided on site to encourage pedestrlan actlvities. With these convenient pedestrlan links between activity centers, the walk mode lnterval trlps would be more convenlent than comparable auto trips. This aspect of the slte plan would produce a safer and more efficlent site enVlronment. Parking Adequacy The proposed Metro Development plans for 5.5 spaces per 1,000 square feet of commercial and 4 spaces per 1,000 square feet of office for each deve 1 opment phase These ratios have proved sat i s facto ry fo r other slmllar developments Therefore, no parking uspillover" out- slde of the slte would occur. Transportation System Manaqement (TSM) Techniques In addition to physical transportation lmprovements, the transporta- tion impacts of the Metro Development could be mltlgated during each phase by measures designed to "manage" or to reduce the trafflc gen- erated by the developments. The following TSM measures would lessen I, I. 31-76 METRD3:M 590-298 04 I I 'I I \1 I t 1/ I, ,I I I , II I I I, 'I I METR03:M the transportatlon impact of the Metro Development. The more success- ful TSM measures lmplemented in other such developments have shown reductlons in the trips generated by 10 to 15 percent. These technl- ques should be applied in each phase of development where possible. o Staggered Work Hours - By shlfting beginning and ending times for major employers in the development, the peaking characteris- tics tend to be spread over a longer period of time, causing less overall congestion and capacity constraints. For example, this program would operate with one larger office tenant begin- ning work at 7:45 AM, a second beginning at 8:00 AM, and a thi rd and a fourth at 8: 15 AM and 8: 30 AM respectively. The afternoon peak hour would likewise have staggered ending times. o Car Pool/Van Pool Programs - Organized car pooling and van pooling programs have proved successful where large employment concentrations exist. To make this program effectively lower tri p generation rates, a concentrated effort 1 s necessary to match home 1 ocat 1 ons and work hours of interested emp 1 oyees. Preferentlal parking locations could be given to high occupancy vehicles to promote the program. Van pooling programs have proved to be successful with both employee owned vans as well as privately owned vans. 31-78 590-298.04 I I I I I I t I, 'I I Ii I I 'II 'I II I 'I I, METR03.M o Park-n-R1de Facil1tles - Wlth the projected growth 1n U S. 19 traffi c, the opportunl ties for openi ng park- n- rl de lots along this corr1dor exist ThlS would allow employees to park 1n an outlYlng facility and rlde the bus to the slte. This program would not only help reduce trips to the slte but would also a1d in reducing traffic growth along U.S. 19 o On-Slte Eatlng/Service Facilities - Commerclal land uses pro- posed on the slte would in effect lower the average trip gener- ation rates for typical office buildings Shops, eatlng facili- t1es and other service-related square footage would satisfy a number of the mid-day trips to and from the slte. o Parking Rates - A mlnimal charge for long-term (employee and non-shoppers) parking could effectlvely increase trends to use local transit and park-n-ride lots. This possibility could negatively effect the employee desi rabi 1 ity of the site, and therefore, should be used wlth proper conslderation 31-79 590-298 04 If I II', I I 'I II , - 'I' I t I ,II II, I l' I 1 \1 QUESTION 39 OFFICE PARKS The development concept for Park Place lncludes 1.5 million square feet of offices as a major component of total land use in the project. Th1S is a co ncept p ropo sa 1 at present, based pr1 mari 1 y on the ge nera 1 us e potentia 1 s 1ndicated by the site's location and the overall development potent1als 1n the Tampa Bay Region. Only preliminary consideration has been given to the manner of d1Sposltion of this property or to prospective office space tenancy. The proposed offi ce space, if operated or managed as a S i ngl e deve 1 opment entity, would exceed the threshold for an Office Park Development of Regional I mpact under Chapte r 22- F, Flori da Adm in is trat i ve Code. Re spo nses in th is sect i on des cri be impacts based on a genera 1 concept that addres ses broad market potentials rather than development approaches based on comm1tted tenancy. A. WILL THE FIRMS ENGAGED IN BUSINESS IN THE PROPOSED OFFICE PARK BE NEW TO THE REGION, NEW BRANCHES OF EXISTING OPERATIONS, OR RELOCA- TIONS OF EXISTING OPERATIONS IN THE REGION? Park Place has the potential to attract each of these types of tenants for the following reasons: o New Regional Businesses -- the planned high quality enV1ronment and high visibility location afford a prestigious sett1ng for companies that seek a Sunbelt location for facilities that will lmpart a strong corporate image. Good accessib1l ity to Tampa International Airport and centrality to many hlgh-amenity 39-1 METR02:X 590-298.06 I: I ,I J \1 I 'I I I I, I I I I' 'I J ,I II I METR02:X resident1al areas for employee hous1ng are other attrlbutes that can playa strong role in attracting relocat1ons to th1S slte o New Branches of Existlng Operat1ons Major business and population growth is now occurring on both sldes of Tampa Bay, part1cularly in m1ddle and upper Pinellas and in north and northwest Hillsborough Counties. Many businesses who are firmly estab 1 i shed in tradit i ona 1 downtown centers of Tampa and St. Petersburg may expand into branch f ac i 1 it i es nearer to these new growi ng markets. Park Place 0 ffers ready acces s to these areas while also maintaining good access to the central office location. o Relocation of Existing Regional Operatlons Some types of businesses are see1n9 their market growth occur 1n areas that are distant from their present location. After weighing the advantages of their present location against the advantage of locating nearer the growth markets, businesses may opt for the latter and choose a site llke Park Place that affords prestige, accessibility and visibility. B. WHAT TYPE OF OPERATION WILL OCCUpy THE OFFICE PARK: I.E. t CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS, DIRECT CUSTOMER SERVICE, ETC.? With 1.5 million square feet of office space planned, Park Place can accommodate space needs of virtually any office tenant. The project scale, together w1th the location advantages and site amenities the development will provide, should make ,t poss1ble to attract at 39-2 590-298.06 I I II ,I ,I I ,I least one maJor tenant lnterested ln establlshing reg10nal or nat10nal headquarters in the Tampa Bay Reglon Flrms that provide dlrect service to businesses ln Hillsborough and Pinellas will be attracted by this slte's locatlon which offers good access to both markets Firms serv i ng re s 1 dent 1 a 1 needs at the commun1ty level would benefit less from the locatlon advantages of Park Place, but could be attracted by the hlgh amenity setting to be provided here. I " I I I I I 'I, I' I 'I- I c. WHAT IS THE SERVICE AREA OF MAJOR OCCUPANTS OF THE OFFICE PARK? The majori ty of offi ce space at Park Pl ace 1 s expected to be occup 1 ed by fi rms who are ori ented to broad regl ona 1 or extra- regional service areas and who would thus gain greater beneflt from the strategic slte location with access to the regional airport and to markets in Pinellas and Hil1sborough counties. A smaller share will be businesses orlented to a community-level service area. O. IF AVAILABLE, WHAT WILL BE THE COST RANGE PER UNIT OR SQUARE FOOT FOR TENANTS TO OCCUpy THE SITE? New general tenant office developments in competltlve locations are s howi ng base rents for 1 easab 1 e space in the $14- $16 range. Base rates at Park Place have not been establ1shed, but early investlga- t ions i ndl cate project feas i bi11 ty at compet it lVe rates. Oi scount rates may be used as a strategy to attract prime tenants, and there 39-3 METR02:X 590-298.06 II I I I I, t I I, I I I I I I' I I . 1 I is the pos sib i 1 i ty that bu i 1 d/ se 11 agreements may be reached wi th some major corporate occupants. IMPACTS ON ESTABLISHED OFFICE EMPLOYMENT CENTERS The Reglonal Comprehens1ve Plan Guide idenbfles the site vlclnity (C 1 earwater Mall area) as a S ub- County Center, planned to serve local communities within a county. Regional centers nearest the area are: Cl earwater CBD; St. Petersburg-Cl earwater Alrport Area, and the Tampa International Airport Area (Westshore). Countryslde, another SUb-County Center, 11es to the north. Park Place will more closely fit the regional or sUb-regional profile than the sub-county profile if the types of development potentlals described here are realized This sect10n descr1bes the potential relationships or lmpacts that the apparent shift of activlty could have on the other centers and on regl ona 1 patterns. In addit i on, the Clty of Safety Harbor has also requested that potential implica- tions of this project for the Safety Harbor CBD be considered. Competition for Regional Office Tenants Park Place enjoys two locational advantages that are also shared by the two regional centers near alrports. i.e.. good access to commer- cia 1 air fac il it i es and to growth centers on both side s of Tampa Bay. These can be important locational factors for firms that serve 39-4 METR02:X 590-298.06 ,II I I ,I ,I I ,I ,I I I I I, I I ,I I I 1 I METR02:X reglonal or extra-regional markets, and thus seem to warrant classl- fY1ng the Clearwater Mall area as a reglonal center that can compete for and effectlvely accommodate the needs of these types of businesses. By comparison, the Clearwater CBD does not enjoy these locational advantages to the same degree, although it can offer the prestlge of a downtown setting. Other factors which may affect the ability of Park Place to compete wlth other regional centers, and which therefore should be considered in evaluating the appropriateness of regional scale development here lnclude the followlng: o Park Place is more centrally located to the major development and growth centers of Pinellas County than the St. Pete- Clearwater Airport regional center. By providing a closer destination to the growing m1d-Pinellas and north Pinellas areas and Pasco County than is afforded at the airport location, thl s site can reduce tri p demands on some heav il y t rave 1 ed north-south reglonal route sections -- a regional benefit. The Westshore area in Hillsborough County will continue to have the best access to the regionl s primary commercial aviation facility. This area is approaching a build-out state, however, and development is begi nni ng to spi 11 over to areas east and west of Tampa International Airport. With few suitable sites 1n these locations in Hillsborough, much of the spillover will have to shift to the next alternative -- across the bay -- if growth of bUS1 nes ses that requ ire good a 1 rport acces 5 1 S to continue. o 39-5 590-298.06 II I I I I I I I I I , I I I ,I I I I I METR02:X o The a 1 ternat lVes for 11 nkl ng Hlllsborough and P1 ne 11 as are llmited: Gandy Bridge, Howard Frankland Bridge, Courtney Campbell Causeway, or around the bay to the north From a regional transportation viewpo1nt, lt would seem appropriate to locate regional centers so as to distribute traffic among these 1 i mi ted a 1 terna t i ves The Courtney Campbe 11 Causeway is 1 es s vulnerable to traffic stoppages caused by acc1dents or disabled vehicles than the two brldge routes because traffic or dlsabled vehi c 1 es can be di verted to the s hou 1 ders. I mprovements to lncrease route capacity can also be accomplished at less expense here than on the brldges. Competitlon for Tenants Servinq Sub-County Areas The Park Place location is less suited to serving a subcounty market because it is not central to a localized residentlal/business growth sector (Tampa Bay truncates the eastern quadrant of a geographlc service area) Community-serving businesses are thus expected to be of lesser importance to its success although some may be attracted by the planned high quality office environment. Clearwater CaD and Countryside office centers will be the primary competitors, the CBD being the traditional community core and Countryside being closer to areas of major recent growth. The Safety Harbor CBD is strongly orlented to businesses that provide services in its immediate area. Its centra 1 1 ocat i on to the 1 oca 1 serv ice a rea s hou 1 d continue to attract those tenants, with minimal lmpact from Park Place. 39-6 590-298.06 I' I I I I I ,I I I I 1\ I I I I I I 1 I METR02:X In summary. the most slgmflcant market penetration by Park Place wlll be in attract 1 ng bus 1 nesses with regi ona 1 or extra- reg1 ona 1 serV1ce areas or functions, and it is possible that Park Place may actua 11 y expand the potentia 1 to attract thes e bu sines s e s to the reglon th ro ugh its own tna rket 1 ng efforts Further, the sped a lty retail concept will tend to function as a positive economic multl- plier in expanding trade for Park Place as well as for surrounding reta i 1 and bus i nes s centers. Ove ra 11. the strength of its ab il i ty to compete will depend on lts abl1ity to better satisfy the needs of these firms than is possible at the location alternatives in an open market 39-7 590-298.06 I I I I I I ,I I Ii I ,I' I I I I I I I I QUESTION 43 SHOPPING CENTERS The development concept for Park Place includes 460,000 square feet of retail space as a major component of total project land use. The planned concept is for development of a specialty retail area ln a hlgh-quality setting. Although seve ra 1 a lternat i ves are be i ng co ns i de red as to the cha racte r th is camp 1 ex will assume, it is not planned as a typical shopping mall such as Clearwater Mall or Countryside Mall. Responses ln thlS section describe impacts based on a concept of development of many small specialty shops, although the type and extent of tenant mix lS at present subJect to only prellminary consideration. A. INDICATE WHETHER THE TENANTS OF THE PROPOSED SHOPPING CENTER WILL BE NEW TO THE REGION, EST AB LI SHI NG A NEW BRANCH I N THE REG I ON, OR RELOCATING WITHIN THE REGION. SPECIFY BY TYPE OF TRADE. The development concept has not been fully set, and only prelimlnary 1 nvest i gat ions have begun on prospective tenancy. Franchi sed or chain specialty retail stores already in the nearby malls, however, are not expected to be drawn here since this complex will break the typical mall pattern by not providlng major anchor department stores. Rather, it is expected that the uni que character planned at Park Place w1ll attract more new entrles to the region from other areas or through newly established proprietor-owned shops. 43-1 METR02:Y 590-298 06 I' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I B. DESCRIBE THE PRIMARY AND SECONDARY TRADE AREAS WHICH THE PROPOSED SHOPPING CENTER WILL SERVE. ESTIMATE ANNUAL SALES TO CUSTOMERS BY COUNTY OF THEIR RESIDENCE. Pr1mary trade areas will be mid-Pinellas County and western Hills- borough County . To succeed, however. a spec 1 a 1 ty cente r 0 f th is nature must also penetrate the total regional market for speclalty items. This will require development of a truly unique complex that can potentially draw shoppers from greater distances. A rough estimate of sales dlstributlon by county of residence lS as follows: Pinellas 65 percent Hillsborough 20 percent Pasco 10 percent Other 5 percent. C. IF AVAILABLE, WHAT WILL BE THE COST RANGE PER UNIT OR SQUARE FOOT FOR TENANTS TO OCCUPY THE SITE? Lease rates have not been set but should be comparable to rates in other major retail centers ln the area IMPACTS ON ESTABLISHED RETAIL CENTERS The Regi ona 1 Comp rehens i ve Plan Gui de i dent i fi es the site vi ci n i ty (Cl earwater Mall area) as a Sub-County Center, planned to serve 1 oca 1 commun it i es wi th in a county. Regi ana 1 centers nea res t the area are: Cl ear\tlater caD; st. Petersburg-Cl earwater Ai rpart Area; 43-2 METR02.Y 590-298.06 I I I I I I I I I I I ,I I I I I - I I I METR02:Y and the Tampa Internatlonal Airport Area (Westshore) Countryslde, another Sub-County Center, lies to the north. The specialty retail development planned for Park Place will be geared more to a broad regional market than to a community scale service area, and it thus wlll more closely flt the reglonal or sub-regional profile than the sUb-county profile. This section descrl bes the potent 1 all mp 1 i cat ions th 1 s change cou 1 d ho 1 d for other act i vi ty centers whi ch mi ght have a reg i ona 11 y s 1 go if i cant impact The City of Safety Harbor has also requested that potential 1 mp 11Cat 1 ons of thl s project for the Safety Harbor CaD also be '> considered. Reglonal Market Penetration Gene ra 1 reta i 1 demand in m; d- Pine 11 as County is genera 11 y well met by existing retail facllities, particularly the Countryside and Clearwater regional shopping malls. Other concentrat1ons in downtown Clearwater, and smaller shopping centers along major streets augment these major fac il it i es. Rec09ni zing thi 5 and the fact that the focus of new market area growth is farther north, planners for Park Pl ace are 1 ooki ng instead toward a retail concept that Wll1 be unlque enough to attract shoppers from a large area for specialty s hopp 1 ng tri ps . as we 11 as complementing exi s t i ng nearby retail opportUnlt1es. It will thus penetrate specialty retail demand for several major centers, dlspersin9 the impact, rather than trying to 43-3 590-298.06 . I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I METR02:Y se rve an a rea that 1 s cong ruent wi th the ma r ket a rea of ex 1 s t 1 ng maJor centers Most tenants at Park Place are not expected to be the same as those chain or franchlse outlets found ln the area's reglonal malls Shops here wlll be targeted to a di fferent demographl c profll e of shoppers, which in some cases will not meet requ1rements of those outlets. The Park Place shops will compete with these establishments for the spec1alty retall dollar, but ln view of the specialty retail sector's relatively small share of overall retall expenditures, the impact on overall growth and sales potential of other retail activity centers of the reglon should not be regionally slgnificant. Local Market Penetration Although Park Place will address a regional market, the surrounding communlties in mid-Pinellas County wlll stand as the primary market area. Specialty shops in Clearwater Mall, Countryside Mall, Clearwater caD and the Safety Harbor CBD wlll be affected by the new competition. Specialty shops, however, do not rely on maintalning a business monopoly for survlval; they instead depend on the exposure they gain from location near a major draw such as a department store. government center, 1 arge employment center. etc To the extent that the existing centers maintain these primary draws, they should be able to continue to attract and hold a share of specialty buslness activity. 43-4 590-298.06 I 1\ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I METR02:Y In summary, the potent 1 a 1 for Park Pl ace to impact other retail centers of the region will depend on its abl1ity to penetrate their markets by offerlng better accessibility, better produce cholce, or a better s hopp i ng envi ronme nt than the compet 1 t 10 n. If th 1 S cou 1 d not be accomp 11 shed, the p roj ect wou 1 d not be feas i b 1 e and there would be no impact. Encouraging new competitlon WhlCh can offer a higher standard of service to the public would appear to be consis- tent with regional objectives of working toward a better urban environment 43-5 590-298.06 r I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I p B Post, Buckl'w<Y, Schuh & Jernigan, Inc. s J CONSULTING ENGINEERS and PLANNERS 245l E NTEAPR IS E ROAD CLEARWATER FLOR IDA 33515.2D12 . 813/796 7275 . TELEX 808435 June 9, 1982 Mr. Anthony L. Shoemaker, Clty Manager City of Clearwater Post Office Box 4748 Clearwater, Florlda 33518 RE: Metro Development Corporation1s Clearwater Slte Dear Tony: Dur1ng our meet1ng on June 4th w1th Larry Wolfe of the Metro Development Corporat1on, T1m Johnson and Dave Healey, lt was agreed that the C1ty would prov1de us w1th letters regarding the ava1lability of certaln serV1ces related to the Metro Development Corporation parcel. The letters we need should address each of the follow1ng: Wastewater Water Supply Flood Insurance SOlld Waste Police Protect1on Flre Protectlon Emergency Medlcal Servlces I have 1ncluded below a more deta1led explanation of the type of 1nfor- matlon that must be addressed 1n each of your letters. Also attached are several coples of the Project Narrat1ve prepared for T8RPC as part of the Development of Reg10nal Impact (DRI) review process, which can be used as additlonal background lnfonmatlon on the proJect. As I mentloned durlng our meetlng, a portlon of the DR! appllcation lnvolves answerlng questions about how the project wlll be provlded wlth necessary utilltles and other publlC serV1ces. Prelimlnary dlScusslons wlth staff persons from T8RPC lnd1cate that we can satlsfy the lntent of the DRI applicat1on, with the added advantage of interacting d1rectly wlth the persons lnvolved 1n key declslon making roles on the local level, by using a correspondence format rather than the lndependent questlon and answer format of the appllcatlon. In order to efflclently exercise thlS option, all of the DRI topics or services affected are summar1zed 1n the followlng paragraphs. In some cases, we have pro- jected future service demands, using the phasing plan found 1n the I' I I I I I I I I I I I I I' I I I I I Mr. Anthony L. Shoemak June 9,1982 Page Two proJect narratlve and per-square-foot demand conversion factors. Partlcular concerns WhlCh have been ralsed by TBRPe, or WhlCh otherWlse seem approprlate to address, also appear under each tOplC. Please advlse us as to any local concerns WhlCh mlght be omltted. We understand that uncondltlonal commitments to serVlce the entlre proJect may not be posslble In all cases at this time. Where not posslble, perhaps commltments could be made by proJect phase. Wastewater Wastewater flow from the project would be solely of human orlgln, wlth the posslble except of a mlnor amount of restaurant waste. Accordlng to the phaslng schedule for the project, average dally prOject service requlrements would be as follows: PHASE I II III TOTAL RETAIL (MGD) OFFICE (MGD) TOTAL (MGO) .015 .033 .048 .024 .041 .065 .030 .039 .069 .069 .113 .182 NOTE: Wastewater generatlon rates and potable water use rates are assumed to be ldentlcal, and are based on 0.15 gpd per sq.ft. for retal1 space, and 0.075 gpd per sq. ft. for office space. We would appreclate a letter of commltment to provide wastewater collectlon and treatment serVlce to the proJect. Also, please clarlfy the relationshlp of the present adminlstratlve moratorlum to thls serVlce request. Any addltlonal informatlon on the Cltyls preferred method of serVlce, or on serVlce problems lf any, would be most appreclated. Water Supply Present plans call for landscaping irrlgatlon requlrements to be met through shallow wells on slte. The following proJectlons of average dally water demand are based on the phaslng schedule in the project narratlve, and on conversion factors shown below: PHASE RETAIL {MGO) OFFICE (MGD) TOTAL (MGD) 1 .015 .033 .048 II .024 .041 .065 III .030 .039 .069 TOTAL .069 .113 .182 NOTE: Wastewater generation rates and potable water use rates are - t I I I I I '" I I I I I I I I I I I I I Mr. Anthony L. Shoemak~ June 9, 1982 Page Three assumed to be ldent1ca1, and are based on 0.15 gpd per sq.ft. for retall space, and 0.075 gpd per sq. ft. for office space. We would appreclate a letter of comm1tment to serve the proJect wlth domest1c water supp11es. Also, please lnd1cate whether proJect demands are large enough to affect future C,ty-wlde water supply alter- natives. Any add1t10nal lnformat10n on the C1ty'S preferred method of serV1ce, or problems related thereto, lf any, would be appreclated. Flood Insurance According to our prel1minary 1nformation, the proJect site is entirely with1n FIRM Zone C, which 15 above the 500 year flood level. The flnal lnternal dra1nage system design and gradlng plan wlll be used to set bU11ding floor elevations above the 100 year des1gn flood level. Please adV1se us as to whether the above 15 correct and acceptable to the C1ty, and whether the C1ty of Clearwater qualifies for federal flood lnsurance. S011d Waste It 1S our understand1ng that solid waste pick up would be provlded by the C1ty, and d1sposal would be prov1ded by P1nellas County through the resource recovery plant now under constructlon. We expect the waste stream from th1S proJect to be composed almost ent1rely of paper and paper products, wlth small amounts of restaurant waste and mlscellaneous trash. The waste stream 15 proJected as follows: Solid Waste (CUblC yards per week)* PHASE RETAIL OFFICE TOTAL I 75 52 126 II 118 65 183 III 148 62 210 TOTAL 340 179 519 *ProJect10ns are based on 1nformation provided by Mr. James McGee of the C1ty of Clearwater San1tat1on Department. Po 1 1 ce The pre-application narratlve shows the Master Concept Plan in- clud1ng access p01nts to surrounding arter1als. The lnternal roadways are proposed for dedication to the C1ty. An internal secur1ty force 15 not presently planned. Please advise us as to the Department's ab1lity to prov1de pollce service to the proJect, and of any related or otherw1se pertlnent II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Mr. Anthony L. Shoemal ~,' June 9, 1982 Page Four lnformatlon WhlCh would help lmprove the project from a pollee pro- tectlon perspectlve. Flre Particular features of the project WhlCh may be lmportant to fire protectlon lnclude plans for mld-rlse bUl1dlngs up to 10 storles in helght. Water pressure for hydrants appears adequate to serve the proJect. Please advise us of the Department's abll1ty to provlde fire pro- tectlon, and of any other pertinent lnformation WhlCh would help us lmprove the proJect from a flre protectlon point of view. Response tlmes and locatlons of responding stations would be helpful in this regard. Emerqency Medlcal SerVlces Please advise us of the City's abillty to provlde Emergency Medical Services to the proJect. Surrounding station locatlons and response tlmes would be helpful In our plannlng. Any other pertinent lnformatlon that would be helpful wlll be appreclated. Tony, I appreclate the aS5lstance both you and Dave have provlded concernlng thls proJect, and your commitment to supply these letters that wl11 help speed up the DRI reVlew process. If you, or anyone on your staff, has a questlon concernlng the attached information or would 1lke addltlonal clarificatlon please have them contact me as soon as posslble. We would 11ke to recelve a draft copy of each of these letters durlng the week of June 14th ln order to give us enough tlme to have them finallzed durlng the week of June 21st and included in the DR! document that wl11 be submltted shortly thereafter. Thank you again for your asslstance. Very truly yours, POST, BUCKLEY, SCHUH & JERNIGAN, INC. Z'l' Edward Mazur, Jr., P.E. Regional Manager EM:cc Enclosures cc - Larry We 1 fe Tim Johnson 590-298.03 I' I Agenda IteM ::2 June 28, 1982 I DRI PREAPPllCATlon R~VIEU: DR! PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE I DRI #92 ~lliTRO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION PIKELLAS COUNTY AND THE CITY OF CLEARWATER JUNE 28, 1982 I Metro Development CorporatLon LS seekLng DRI approval for a multL-purpose retaLI/offlce park Ln the northeast quadrant of the lntersection of US 19 and Gulf to Bay Boulevard (SR 60) (directly across from the Clearwater Mall) 1n central Pinellas County. The proposed Metro Development Corpora- tlon proJect 15 planned to provlde 1,500,000 square feet of office and 460,000 square feet of retail space and will conslst of a mix of four to 10 story off1ce bUlld1ngs 1n a garden sett1ng. ut1l1zlng earth berms for n01se reduction. A three phase, nine-year development build-out is planned. Metro Development Carporatlon has submltted the attached summary narratlve expla1nlng their proposal. I I I I Based on review of the proJect summary narrative submitted by the appli- cant, adopted Local Goverment Comprehensive Plans, regional plans, studles and reports, other Developments of Reglona1 Impact (ORIs) in the area. the Council's adopted Regional Issues List and the Council's adopted growth policy, The Future ~ the Reglon, the followlng reglonal issues are identi- fled with this proposed pro Ject: I I 1. Transportation - The reglonal review will require identification of the 1mpact of the proposed project on regional roadways. the roadway improvements which will be necessary on those roadways to maintain a level of serVlce consistent with adopted Council policy and funding earn ml tme nts to lmpleme n t id en tif ied road way improvements. The regi onal reV1ew will also require that mass transit design capaclty and transportation management techniques such as a park and ride fac1lities be assessed. I I Additionally, the regional review will consider transportation-related hazards to children walking to and from Eisenhower Elementary School. I A. The transportation study area will he bounded by: I SR 580 on the north SR 686 on the south Hercules Avenue on the west Bayshore Boulevard on the east I I B. The Application for Development Approval (ADA) shall assess the impact of the proposed development on the intersectlons within the impact area and maJor roadway-links connecting these intersections at a minimum. and shall address needed improvements to all links I tempa bay regional planning council 9455 K oge r Boulevard 51 Petersburg FL 33702 . (813) 577. 5151/T ampa 224-9380 I II I and InterSectlons to which thlS development will contrib)!te flve percent or more of the dally Level of Servlce "c" traffic lLevel of ServIce "D" durlng peak hours). I C. The transportatIon methodology referenced In the DRI narratlve summdry shall be adhered to In the ADA.. Justlflcation \tnll need to be provIded for any departure from the referenced methodology. I 2. PubllC Facllltles - The regIonal review will requl re as surances from provIders that sufflclent capaclty to provIde pub1lc faclllties to the proposed development wlll be avallable. I 3. Environment - the extent to WhlCh this prOject wlll impact water quallty and alr quality will be of concern during the regional review. I I 4. Economlcs - the regIonal rev Ie"" will require cIa rIf lca t lon as to the abll1ty of the regIon to support the construction of 1,500,000 square feet of offlce space and 460,000 square feet of retail space at this locatIon. I The regional revlew wlll also require assessment of the potentIal for adverse economic Impacts on other area activity centers: I CountrysIde Downtown Clearwater St. Petersburg/Clearwater Airport Area I 5. Energy and Water Conservation - The regional reVlew will require clarI- fIcation of energy and water conservation measures that will be incorporated in the proposed projec~ I It has been agreed that the following questions may be elim~nated from the ADA: I Question #26 EducatIon Quest~on #32 - Housing I It has been further agreed that the following changes will be made in the ADA format: I Question 19: Historical and Archaeological Resources - Substitute a pro- posed Development Order cond~tion to the effect that a professional archaeological survey will be completed before construction beginsj and stipulat~ng that any historical or archaeological resources discovered will be reported to the Florida Division of Archives~ History and Records Management. Further stipulate that the ultimate disposition of such re- sources would then be determined in cooperation with the Division of Archives and the local government with jurisdiction. A copy of the legal descriptIon and the ADA response to Question 19 shall be sent to Florida Division of Archives, History and Records Management. I I I Ques tion 21 : Wastewater - Present two letters in lieu of the ADA ques- tions. The first would be from the applicant providing the City of Clearwater with project phasing, projected demands for serv~cet and inquiry as to the City's ability to provide service. The second would be the I I I' I CIty'S letter of commitment to provIde servIce, acknowledg~ng phased demands of the proJect. I Questlon 22: Dralnage - Present the Master DraInage Plan and stIpulate to satlsfy the Clty'S and DER's requ1rements for stormwater quant1ty and qualIty control. Also stIpulate that the completed applIcation to DER for Storm~ater DIscharge Permlt would be copled to TBRPC and the Clty of Clearwater and that the Master Dral.nage Plan shall be a condItion of the Development Order and shall address the CounCll's adopted water qualIty pol1c1e<; as contained 1n the Future ~ the RegIon and aSSlgn maintenance responslbl1lties. I I Question 23: Water Supply and Questlon 24: Solid Waste - Answer in the same format as for questlon 21 above. I Question 28: H~a1th Care - Substltute two letters addressing EMS response tlmes, staffIng, and abIllty to servlce the proJect. I Questlo~ 29: PolIce and Questlo~ 30: Fire - Answer wlth a letter from the Clty of Clearwater concernlng ablllty to provide safety protection to the proJect. The ADA shall address spec~f~c f~re protection dev~ces to be Incorporated ~nto the deslgn of the buildings. I I The ADA shall respond to the attached questLons prov~ded by Southwest F10rlda Water Management D~str~ct. I The Councll's regional review shall focus on, but not be llmited to, the above referenced reglonal lSSues. The regional review shall also consider comments recelved from other agencies, issues resultlng from project site !nspection and pertinent information from other sources whlch may be brought to the Council's attention during the regional review. I The Clearinghouse Review Commitee has on this date adopted this report which shall become the basis of subsequent project review pursuant to Chapter 380.06, Florida Statutes and instructs that the appllcant also respond to any attached comments from reviewing agencies. I I Committee adopted I Mayor George McGough. Chairman Clearinghouse Review Committee I I I I I il I I I I I-- I I I I I I I I I I I I I TECHNICAL APPENDIX PART III - Procedure 1n Determing Daily link Capac1ties In January of 1979 the Florlda Department of Transportation, Urban Transportation Pl anning Sectlon issued a technical memo deal 1 ng wi th UTP dai ly service vol urnes. The memo read as fo11 ows: UA strong desire exists to equate Daily Service Volumes (capacities) to a given level-of-service. Based on UTP Procedure No. I, which was last revlsed January 17, 1978, the resultant subject values herein are developed by area type, facillty type, and number of 1 anes in both directions. Daily Service \'01 urnes have been deternnned for level-of-Service lie II , "DlI, and liEu. II Procedure No. TI or , , as referred to above, was developed to dchieve simplified, quick. and manageable traffic assignment procedures for Florlda's urbanized areas. To do this, tables were developed showing hourly intersection capacities in vehicles per hour per lane. These tables were then used as input to the UROAD model so that 1 ink. capac i ti es cou 1 d be estab 1i shed resulting in traffic assignments to an urban network. These capaclties were develoged using prcedures outlined in Highway Research Board, Speci al Report 87, uHi ghway Capacity Manual 1965" Chapter Six. In order to us the HCM for thi s purpose some general assumptions pertaining to grades, metropolitan population, percent trucks, percent left and right tu rns, ect. had to be made. These assumpti on s are 1 i sted below: 1. Al.l .capacities are ~ lane, one direction, hourly capaclt1es 2. Capacities are Level of Service liE", possible capacities, therefore load Factor = 1 vi I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 3. Lane width, lateral restnctlons, alinment, and grades wlll have negligible effect on capaclties of freeways and expressways 4. Percent trucks = 5%, adj ustment factor W = 0.95 for freeways, W = adJustment factor for lane wldth and 1 ateral c1 earance. (HeM Tabl e 9.2) 5. Area type will not effect freeway capacities 6. Grades in Florida have negligable effect on capacities 7. Populatlon approxamately 500,000 8. Peak hour factor - .85 9. For system level pl anning in urban areas, critical arterial capacities will occur at signalized i ntersec tl ons, therefofS:, except fOf freways, intersection capacities will be used. 10. 50% of tile Four Lane arterial afld cnllector f ac i1 i t ~ ~s ha'.e park 1 ng on both sides and 50% have no parlcing, 11. 25% of the Six Lane a rteri a 1 s and call ec to rs have parking on both sides and 75% have no parking, 12. Parking lanes are 8 feet wlde 13. Greentime over cycl e 1 enth, G/e varies from 0.4 for collectors to 0.6 for divided arterials When it was learned that there was a desire to develop generalized daily service volumes by Level-of-Service, the hourly capacities were expanded to daily vol urnes. The assumption was made that peak hour traffic is equal to 10% of the daily traffic (Ie = 10%). Tables Showing UTPS Daily Service Volumes for Levels- of-Service "ClI, "0" and liE II were developed. To perform the analysis required to satisfy Question 31 of this DRI for Metro Development Corporation a large amount of field data was collected. These field data included lane confi gurati ons per approach, movement vol urnes per approach and vii II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I s1gnal tlmlng and phaslng all of which were collected for a total of 38 intersections in the study area. This fleld information as well as data collected from FDOTt Plnellas County and the Clty of Clearwater allows parameters that were assumed in procedure No. T1 to be defined on a site specific bases. The 1 evel s of servi ce found on roadway sectlons 1 n Fl gures through _ of the ADA were determ i ned by app 1 yi ng the same methodology used by FOOT to determine the UTPS daily service volumes for various levels-of-servlce. The difference is that slte specific data were used in the ADA analysis rather than the generalized assumptlons used by FOOT in 1978 and 1979. viii I I DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC BY INTERSECTION I (Phase II) I NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INTERSECTION LT THR RT LT THR RT LT THR RT LT THR RT I 1. U.S. 19 & S.R. 580 316 83 2. U.S. 19 & Countryslde 315 91 3. U.S. 19 & Sunset Pt. 294 34 102 11 I 4. U.S. 19 & Coachman 330 III 5. U.S. 19 & Drew 234 113 72 151 201 100 6. U.S. 19 & S.R. 60 89 97 67 300 67 7. U.S. 19 & Druid 86 248 6 I 8. U.S. 19 & Harn 86 244 9. U.S. 19 & Nursery 78 231 16 6 10. U.S. 19 & Belleair 66 155 10 11. U.S. 19 & Halnes Bayshore 63 190 I 12. U.S. 13 & Roosevelt 36 116 - 26 13. Hercules & Drew 51 181 14. Hercules & Cleveland I 15. Hercules & S.R. 60 74 253 16. Hercules & Druid 6 16 17. Belcher & Old Coachman 32 i2 18. Belcher & Sunset Pt. I 19. Belcher & Coachman 20. Belcher & Drew 52 1B2 21. Belcher & Cleveland 22. Belcher & S.R. 60 17 74 66 215 I 23. Belcher & Druld 17 50 16 6 16 - 24. Belcher & Harn 17 50 25. Belcher & Nursery 17 48 ~6 16 I 26. Belcher & Belleair 17 46 10 33 27. Old Coachman & Sunset Pt. 32 23 28. Old Coachman & Coachman 32 23 29. Old Coachman & Drew 16 20 52 185 32 I 30. Old Coachman & S.R. 60 6 91 284 16 31. McMullen Booth & Maln 130 46 11 34 32. McMullen Booth & Coachman 133 48 I 33. McMullen Booth & S.R. 60 84 34 368 157 34. Bayshore & S.R. 60 23 67 384 132 35. S.R. 60 & Mal' Qrlve I 186 418 36. S.R. 60 & Mall Drive II 117 - 300 186 118 29 I 37. S.R. 60 & Hampton 251 84 117 63 128 38. S.R. 60 & Sky Harbor 147 . I I I I II ~ 2 I I DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC BY INTERSECTION (Phase III) I NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INTERSECTION LT THR RT LT THR RT LT THR RT LT THR RT I I. U.S. 19 & S.R. 580 597 - 138 I 2. U.S. 19 & Countrysl de 439 148 3. U.S. 19 & Sunset Pt. 467 52 163 20 4. U.S. 19 & Coachman 526 186 5. U.S. 19 & Drew 370 196 117 238 96 163 I 6. U.S. 19 & $.R. 60 - 158 166 106 475 106 7. U.S. 19 & Druld 148 392 10 8. U.S. 19 & Harn 148 387 9. U.S. 19 & Nursery 138 361 26 10 I 10. U.S. 19 & Bellea;r 118 313 52 20 II. U.S. 19 & Halnes Bayshore 115 304 1Z. U.S. 19 & Roosevelt 60 130 165 42 I ...3. Hercwles & Drew 85 231 14. Hercules & Cleveland 15. Hercules & S.R. 60 124 337 16. Hercules & Druid 26 I 17 Belcher & Old Coachman 102 37 18. Belch~r & S~nset Pt. 19. Belcher & Coachman 20. Belcher & Drew 86 232 I 21. Belcher & Cleveland 22. Belcher & $.R. 60 29 125 340 23. Belcher & Druid 28 79 26 iO 26 I~ . 24. Belcher & Harn 28 79 25. Belcher & Nursery 27 77 10 26 - ,.. 26. Belcher & Bellealr 27 n 19 52 - I. 27. Old Coachman & Sunset Pt. 102 37 I 28. Old Coachman & Coachman 104 38 29. Old Coachman & Drew 26 29 10 88 236 79 30. Old Coachman & S.R. 60 10 156 449 26 31- McMullen Booth & Main 204 73 20 52 I 32. McMullen Booth & Coachman 206 74 33. McMullen Booth & S.R. 60 132 53 581 264 34. Bayshore & S.R. 60 39 106 607 224 I 35. S.R. 60 & Mall Drive I 324 660 36. S.R. 60 & Mall Drlve II 185 - 475 324 185 66 37. S.R. 60 & Hampton 396 - 132 185 119 198 38. S.R. 60 & Sky Harbor 185 251 I I I I II - 3 I DRI2003-0900 1 PARK PLACE DRI ANNUAL STATUS REPORT I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I PARK PlACE (DRI NO. 92) CITY OF CLEARWAlER FLORIDA DRI ANNUAL STATUS REPORT For the Year Ending September 1, 1995 March, 1996 PREPARED FOR: AMERICAN CYANAMID One Cyanamid Plaza Wayne, NJ 07470 PREPARED BY: KING ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. 24945 U.S. 19 North Clearwater, FL 34623 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TABlE OF CONlENTS PAGE I. IN'TRODUCfION....,..............,....... ...,.,.,.. 1 II. ANNUAL STATUS REPORT. .. . ......,.... ............ 1-4 III. EXHIBITS....... . . . ........ . ....,.... .....,.,.. 5-24 EXHIBIT A - CHANGES - PROPOSED PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT EXHIBIT A-I - CITY OF CLEARWATER ORDINANCE (NO. 5142-91) APPROVING DRI DEVELOPMENT ORDER AMENDMENT EXHIBIT A-2 - CITY OF CLEARWATER ORDINANCE NO. 5722-95 APPROVING DR! DEVELOPMENT ORDER AMENDMENT EXIllBIT B - APPROVED REVISED MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN (MAP H) EXHIBIT C - SUMMARY OF DEVELOPMENT ACllVITY EXHIBIT D - CHANGE IN OWNERSHIP EXHIBIT D-l - PARK PLACE BLVD. DEDICATION EXHIBIT E - NOT APPLICABLE EXHIBIT F - PERMIT INFORMATION EXHIBIT G - COMPLIANCE WITH DEVELOPMENT ORDER CONDITIONS & ADA COMMITMENTS (PPDRI929S) i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I (PPDRI92.95) 1 INTRODUcnON ThIS annual status report has been prepared pursuant to the requirements contained WIthin the Park Place (DRI No. 92) Development Order (as origmally adopted by the City of Clearwater on September 1, 1983, amended and adopted on October 20, 1983, and readopted on December 8, 1983), and as further amended via Development of Regional Impact (DRI) Notices of Proposed Change (NOPC) approved by the CIty of Clearwater (OrdInance Nos. 5142.91 and 5722-95) on December 19, 1991 and January 19, 1995, respectfully, and Chapter 380.06(18) F.S. TIus report is bemg submItted SImultaneously to the City of Clearwater (local government), the Tampa Bay RegIOnal Planning Council (TBRPC), the Southwest Flonda Water Management District (SWFWMD), and the Department of Community Affairs, Division of Resource Planning & Management, Bureau of State Planrung (DCA). ll. ANNUAL STATUS REPORT Reporting Penod' 9/1/94 to Month/Day /Y ear 9/1/95 Month/Day /Y ear Development: Park Place (DRI No 92) Location' Clearwater. City Pinellas County Developer. Name. AmerIcan Cyanamid Company Name Address' One Cyanamid Plaza 07470 Street Location Wayne. NJ 07470 City, State, Zip Code 1 DESCRIBE ANY CHANGES MADE IN TIIE PROPOSED PlAN OF DEVELOPMENT, PHASING, OR IN TIIE REPRESENTATIONS CON- TAINED IN TIlE APPliCATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL SINCE TIlE DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT RECEIVED APPROVAL NOTE ANY ACTIONS (SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION DETERMINATIONS) TAKEN BY LOCAL GOVERNMENT TO ADDRESS TIlESE CHANGES. The proposed plan of development for the Park Place DRI is speCifically discussed in Exht"bit A 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I (PPDRm9S) 2. HAS TIIERE BEEN A CHANGE IN ux:AL GOVERNMENT JURIS- DICTION FOR ANY PORTION OF THE DEVEWPMENT SINCE THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER WAS ISSUED? IF SO, HAS THE ANNEX- ING LOCAL GOVERNMENT ADOPTED A NEW DEVEWPMENTOF REGIONAL IMP ACf DEVEWPMENT ORDER FOR THE PROJEer? PROVIDE A COpy OF THE ORDER ADOPTED BY THE ANNEXING LOCAL GOVERNMENT. Park Place was annexed by the City of Clearwater shortly after initial Development Order approval by Pmellas County. On October 20, 1983, the Development Order was amended and reIssued for the project by the CIty of Clearwater. No other changes m local JUrISdIctIOn have occurred. 3. PROVIDE COPIES OF ANY REVISED MASTER PLANS, INCRE- MENTAL SITE PlANS, ETC., NOT PREVIOUSLY SUBMITfED. The Amended Master Development Plan approved Via Ordmance No. 5722~ 95 (DRI Development Order Amendment) is included with thIS report as Exhibit A-2 and shows the current proposed plan of development. All other plans preVIously subnntted and not superseded by the 1995 Amendment remam in effect. 4. PROVIDE A SUMMARY COMPARISON OF DEVEWPMENT ACTIVI- IT PROPOSED AND ACIlJALLY CONDUCfED FOR TI-IE REPORT- ING YEAR, AS WELL AS A CUMUIATIVE TOTAL OF DEVELOP- MENT PROPOSED AND ACIUALLY CONDUClED TO DATE. Please see Exhibit C for a summary comparIson of development activity proposed and conducted 5. HAVE ANY UNDEVELOPED TRAcrs OF lAND IN THE DEVEWP- MENT (OTHER THAN INDIVIDUAL SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS) BEEN SOID TO A SEPARATE ENTITY OR DEVEWPER? IF SO, IDENTIFY lRACf, ITS SIZE AND THE BUYER PROVIDE MAPS WIDCH SHOW TIlE TRACTS INVOLVED. Exhibit D describes ownershIp Wlthm the Park Place project. 6 DESCRIBE ANY lANDS PURCHASED OR OYIlONED ADJACENT TO TIlE ORIGINAL DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACf SITE, SUBSEQUENT TO ISSUANCE OF TIIE DEVEWPMENT ORDER. IDEN11FY SUCH LAND, ITS SIZE AND INTENDED USE ON A SITE PlAN AND MAP. 2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I (l'I'DRm.9S) To the best of our knowledge, no lands adjacent to the DRI site have been purchased or optIoned by the current owners of undeveloped land in the Park Place project or by the previous developer. 7. liST ANY SUBSTANTIAL ~ STATE AND FEDERAL PERMITS WlllCH HAVE BEEN OBTAINED, APPLIED FOR, OR DENIED, DURING THIS REPORTING PERIOD. SPECIFY THE AGENCY, TYPE OF PERMIT AND DUTY FOR EACH. See Exhibit F for a lIst of permit and approval informatIon. 8. PROVIDE A UST SPECIFYING EACH DEVELOPMENT ORDER CONDmON AND EACH DEVEWPER COMMITMENT, AS CONTAlNED IN TIlE ADA, AND STAlE HOW AND WHEN EACH CONDmON OR COMMITMENT HAS BEE COMPLIED WITH DURING TIlE ANNUAL REPORT REPORTING PERIOD. Attached as Exlnbit G. 9. PROVIDE ANY INFORMAll0NTIlATISSPECIFICALL YREQUIRED BY THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN TIlE ANNUAL REPORT. In additIOn to items reqUired by the Annual Report form, the Park Place Development Order speCifIcally reqUires each Annual Report to mcl ude the following: 'a discussion of all development activities proposed to be conducted ....for the year Immediately subsequent to the submission of the Annual Report" and. Ita statement listing anticipated applicatlOns for Development Approvals or Permits..... whIch the Developer proposes to submlt dunng the year immediately followmg submittal of the Annual Report" and: "a cumulatIve reporl of trade.offs made pursuant to SubsectIOn 4.A.A. hereof during reporting year" Development actIvities proposed in the previous Annual Report included the completion of the Storz Ophthalrnics lIght industrial building which occurred November 1992. 3 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I (pPDRI929S) 10. During the reporting year 9/93 - 9/94, the outparcels along SR-60 were developed and construction completed for two restaurants. Construction is on-going for a dnve-thru restaurant scheduled to open in early 1996. To the best of our knowledge, at the present time there are no specific development plans for the coming year for the Park Place DRI To the best of our knowledge, no specIfic development approvals and perrruts are planned to be submitted dunng the year immediately following this Annual Report. In reference to trade-off mechanisms, no use of the establIshed converSIOn factors were utilized during this reporting year PROVIDE A STATEMENT CERTIFYING THAT AlL PERSONS HA VB BEEN SENT COPIES OF TIlE ANNUAL REPORT IN CONFORMANCE WITH SUBSECTIONS 380.06(15) AND (18), F.S. I hereby certify that a copy of thIS annual report has been sent to the City of Clearwater, the Tampa Bay RegIonal Planning Council, State Department of Community Affairs, and Southwest Flonda Water Management Dlstnct on March 29, 1996. In additlon, owners identified in Exhtbit D have been sent a copy of the report. Person completmg the questionnaire: Title: Director of Planning King Engineering Associates, Inc Representing: American Cyanamid 4 I I Ill. EXHIBITS I EXHIBIT A - CHANGES IN PROPOSED PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT I EXHIBIT A-I - CITY OF CLEARWATER ORDINANCE NO. 5142-91 APPROVING DRI DEVELOPMENT ORDER AMEND MENT I EXHIBIT A-2 - CITY OF CLEARWATER ORDINANCE NO. 5722-95 APPROVING DRI DEVELOPMENT ORDER AMENDMENT I EXHIBIT B - APPROVED REVISED MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN (MAP H) I EXHIBIT C - SUMMARY OF DEVEWPMENT ACTIVITY EXHIBIT D - CHANGE IN OWNERSHIP I EXHIBIT D-1- PARK PLACE BLVD. DEDICATION I EXHIBIT E - NOT APPLICABLE EXHIBIT F - PERMIT INFORMATION I EXHIBIT G - COMPLIANCE WITH DEVELOPMENT ORDER CONDmONS & ADA COMMITMENTS I I I I I I I I (PPD~ 5 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I EXIllBIT A CHANGES - PROPOSED PLAN OF DEVEWPMENT Exhibit A-lis a copy of the Clty of Clearwater OrdInance No. 5142-91 (adopted 12/19/91), approvmg the DRI Development Order Amendment request and determimng that the Amendment did not constitute a "SubstantIal Deviation" from the pnor approved Development Order. On August 29, 1994, Storz OphthalIDIcs, Inc and Building Operation Holdmg Company, owners of certam undeveloped areas of the Park Place DRI, filed a "NotificatIOn of a Proposed Change to a Previously Approved DRI" WIth the City of Clearwater, TERPC, and DCA. Exhibit A-2 is a copy of the rendered, certified Development Order Amendment, deemed to be a non-substantial deViatIOn and adopted by the City of Clearwater as OrdInance No. 5722~95 on January 19, 1995. In summary, this amendment to the Development Order: {pPDRm9S} 1. 2. 3 4. 5 Modified the phasmg to one (1) phase WIth no subphases; Decreased office development by 7,480 square feet, Clanfled development entitlements allocated to each parcel of the development; Extended bUild-out date by four (4) years (a cumulative extension of 9 years), Added conversion factors for the converSIOn of certain offIce development to multI-famIly, and for industnal to either office or multI-farmly development; Deleted or modified conditions to reflect changes in transportation network; and Restated remaining transportation improvement obligations of the Developer. 6 7. 6 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I EXHIBIT A-I CITY OF CLEARWATER ORDINANCE NO. 5142-9~ APPROVING DRI DEVELOPMENT ORDER AMENDMENT ~m~ 7 I I- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I '12/10/9~ 16'10 ~ ~002l012 OROINANCE NO. 5142-91 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, RELATING TO PARK PLACE, A DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT; AMEND I NG ORD I NANCE 3205-83, THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER FOR PARK PLACE, AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE 3287.83; PROVID rNG F I NO I NGS OF FACT AND CONCL.U S IONS OF LAW: P ROV I 0 I NG FOR AMENDME NTS TO THE CONCEPTUAL PLAN AND PHASING OF THE DEVELOPMENTj DETERMINING THAT THE AMENDMENTS ARE NOT A IISUBSTANTIAL DEVIATIOW FROM THE APPROVED DEVELOPMENT ORDER; DETERMINING THAT THE AMENDMENTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on September 11 1983, the City Commission adopted Ordinance 3205- 83 (the l'Oevelopment Orderll) I which ordinance constitutes a development order for Park Place1 a development of reglonal lrnpact, affecting the property described on Exhlbit uAR attached hereto and incorporated hereln; and WHEREAS, on October 20, 1983, the City Comrnlssion adopted Ordinance 3287- 83, an amendment to the Development Order, and readopted Ordlnance 3287-83 on December 8, 1983; and WHEREAS, on August 19, 19911 Buildlng Operation Holding Company, the owner of certain undeveloped areas of Park Place, flled an appllcation entitled "Notlflcation of a Proposed Change to a Previously Approved Development of Regional Impact {"DRP}, pursuant to Subsection 380.06(19), Florida Statutes (the II NOPCIl) I propos 1 ng to (1) amend the Conceptua 1 Plan for Park Place to prov i de for 200,000 square feet of floor area for industrlal use and a reductlon of the approved floor area for offlce use by 300,000 square feet; (i i) provlde a maximum floor area ratlo (IIF.A.R.") for lndustrial usej (ill) amend the phasing of the development; (iv) amend all Development Order condltions based on phaslngj (v) change the time of payment of the Deve 1 oper 1 s proport 1 onate share of road improvement costSj and (vi) extend the build-out date by five (5) yearsj and WHEREAS, on December 19, 1991, the City Commission adopted Ordinance 5114- 9 1, reloni ng a port i on of the property from "Genera 1 Off i,e II to "Research, Development and Office Park ,II and Ordlnance 5113.91, amendlng the land use plan designatlon for the same portlon of the property from IIResidentiall Office" to II Indus tr i a 1 I II cons i sten t Wl th the proposed ,rev i sed Conceptua 1 Plan for Park Place; and WHEREAS, the C ;ty Commi ss ion, as the govern i og body of the loca 1 government having jurisdictlon pursuant to Chapter 380, Florida Statutes, is authorized and empowered to cons1der amendments to ORris; and WHEREASj the City Commiss1on has revlsed the NOPC, as well as a11 related testimony and eVldence submitted by each party and members of the general publlcj now, therefore, - " ;"".......... /::'; ~ 00:3/012 .1 '1 I I I .-1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I , 12/10/93 16 11 'B' BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER. FLORIDA: Section 1. Introduction. This ordlnance shall constitute an amendment to the Park Place Development Order as previously amended. Section 2. Findinos. The Clty Commission. having received all related comments. testimony and ev i dence subml tted by each party and members of the gene ra 1 pub 1 ie, f 1 nd s that there is subs tan t i a 1 competen t ev 1 dence t-o s up port the following flnd1ngs of fact: A. The Park Place Development Order, as adopted by Ordinance 3205-83, and amended by Ordinance 3287-83, lS a valid final development order within the provisions of Section 163.3167(BL Florida Statutes, affecting the property described on Exhlbit "An attached hereto and incorporated herein. B. Buildlng Operating Hold1ng Company has proposed the following amendments to the Park Place Development Order: 1. Revising the Conceptual Plan for Park Place to provlde for 200,000 square feet of floor area for industrial use and a reduction of the approved floor area for off lee use by 300 I 000 square feet to 803.000 square feet; 2. Adding a condition that the maximum F.A.R. for industrial use is 0.4; 3. 4. Amending the phaslng of the development; Amending all Development Order condit1ons based on phasing; 5. Changing the time of payment of the Developer's proportionate share of the cost of road improvements which would have been paid concurrently with Phases II and I II to a date 90 days after the effect 1 ve date of th i s ordinancej 6. Eliminating the requirement for a transportation management plan; and 7. Extendlng the bUlld-out date by five (5) years. C. A comprehens we review of the impacts generated by the proposed amendments, together with all previous amendments, has been conducted by the City's departments, the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council (hTBRPC") and the Department of Community Affairs, State of Florida (QOCA~). D. The proposed amendments, together with all previous amendments, do not increase the external trafflC lmpact of the development, nor do they create additional 1mpacts on other public facll1tles, including water, wastewater, drainage, solid waste, recreation and mass translt, from the original projections set forth in the Amended Application for Development Approval. 2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I " 12/10/9~ 16 12 ~OOV012 'E: E. The Clty Commission has adopted Ordinance 5113-91. amending the land use plan desIgnation, and Ordinance 5114~91, rezoning a portion of the property cons1stent w1th the revised Conceptual Plan. Section 3. Conclusions of Law. The City Commission, having made the above findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law: A. Development 1n accordance with the proposed amendments, 1ncludlng the revised Conceptual Plan, will not unreasonably interfere with the ach1evement of the object i ves of the adopted State Land Deve 1 opment Plan app 1 i cab 1e to the area. B. The proposed amendments are consistent w1th the land development regulations and the comprehensive plan of the City. C. The proposed amendments. together with all previous amendments, do not create a reasonable likelihood of additional impact, or any type of regional 1 mpact not prev 1 OUS 1y rev iewed by the reg iona 1 p 1 ann 1 ng agency, over those treated under the Development Order. The proposed amendments. therefore, do not constitute a "substantlal devlat1Cn" from the Park Place Development Order, pursuant to Chapter 380.061 Florida Statutes. D. Noth1ng herein shall l1mit or modlfy the rights originally approved by the Development Order or the protection afforded under Section 163.3167(8), Florida Statutes, except to the extent that speciflc rights and protections are 1 imited or modlfied by the proposed amendments to the Oeve lopment Order as approved by this ordinance. E. The amendments are w1thin the threshold guidelines of Ordwance 4983- 90 of the CitYI relating to determinations of vested development rlghts, and the Park Place DRI remains vested thereunder. F. These proceed i ngs ha ve been du ly conducted pursuant to app 1 i cab 1 e 1 aw and regulatlons, and based upon the record in these proceedings, the varlOUS departments of the Clty and BUllding Operation Holding Company are authorized to approved/conduct development as descrlbed herein. G. The review by the City, the TBRPC, and other participating agencies and interested Cltlzens reveals that impacts are adequately addressed pursuant to the requlrements of Chapter 380, Florida Statutes. Sectlon 4. Order. Havlng made the above findings of fact and drawn the above conclus1ons of law, lt is ordered that tne Development Order be amended as fo llows: A. The Conceptua 1 Plan descti bed in Sect ions 4 (A) and 4 (J) of the De ve 1 opmen t Orde r 1 s amen ded ass hown on Exh i b; t 11811 attached heret 0 and incorporated herein. All references to the Conceptual Plan set forth ln the Development Order shall refer to the Amended Conceptual Plan attached hereto as Exh1blt "B.ll B. Section 4(C) of the Development Order is amended to provide that the Project is approved for a total maximum floor area of 1,153,000 square feet, 3 . 12/10/93 16 13 'Zr III 005/0121 comprised of a maXlfflum 803,000 square feet of offlce use, a maximum 150,000 square feet of reta i1 COrmlerc i a 1 use and a ma;:.:: imum 200,000 square feet of lndustrial use. C. Sectlon 4{C)(1) of the Development Order is amended to provide that industrial use shall have a maXlmum F.A.R. of 0.4. D. fa 11 ows : The Project shall consist of one phase as follows: Sect lon 4 (C)(2) of the Deve 1 opment Order is amended to read as Phase Maximum Floor Area In Square Feet Retail Commercial Office Industrial Total Phase A 150,000 803,000 200,000 1,153,000 Phase A sha 11 be divided into three subphases as follows: SubDhase Maximum Floor Area In Sou are Feet Retail Commercia 1 Off ice Industrial Total Al 150,000* 480,000** 200,000 830,000 A2 198,000 198,000 A3 125,000 125,000 Total 150,000 803,000 200,000 1,153,000 *Includes 55,278 square feet existlng as of 12-19-91. _ ++Includes 120,560 square feet eXisting as of 12:19-91. E. Section 4.0. of the Development Order is amended to read as follows: The Developer agrees to acquire land, or to pay the City for land required to be acquired by the CitYl to provlde ingress and egress to the west of the ProJect. Specifically, access to the west shall interconnect wlth the existing easement at the north end of M & 8 19-1, 20,20-1 and 20-1A (Benniganls, Chi Chils and Perkins) to the U.S. 19 frontage road and through the Bennigan's site to the existing traffic light at State Road 66. Ascess .hall Sa ~r:;ld:~ ~~Ji~=R~~~t~g~A~~~~ht~:Be~~~t2tG~at~~~ ~; ~e (:~~~J~~~c~;:~e~i~ ~f. ~rc 11mi FlJr,)' site Jill afl ap Iii rova 1 for PRase r Sa i d ingress and egress shall be secured by fee simple acquisltlon, right-af-way easementl or other appropriate mecnanlsm by either the Developer or the City. ~: _a:.~isitleFl caRnat Be aEcampl iSRsd By t~c ~~~ele~c: on te~:~ ~:~: ~:~a 1 e te :~e Deve lope}' , ~J:tcn. ~ pOA :.,n ~~"'~'t f:q~~~ 131 ~4= gevelsfJer, the Clty agrees te :!:Ie I:ltlllZatlBR -- __$ -IR ~~t--ORl--- 4 . . .1 I I I ._1 I .1 I I I I I I I I I I: , I: " 12/10/93 1-- - - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 16 13 'B' ~ 006/012 Best Copy Available pOlflcrs urder Chapter 73, Florida Stah:c$ to .Jcquirc such rigt:t of ~'IJY. The City Jgrees to exercise such C!),lnont domJin pO'.'l'ers so 1e 1)' under CI1.::.ptcr 73, rlOr1 da Statutes, 1-; Access.:n:y I llith1n tuch'c (12) months after the effcf:ti':e date of this Order', conslstcRt with t~c Jppl~ca~le ~revisions of law, In recogAitlon ~hat It 1$ ~R ~hc publ~c iAtcrcst thJt sueR 1ngrCS: and egress b~ obtained. !F1 tAe event that the Clty so exercises its power of eminent dSl);aiR to ~cquirc rigAts In any of the Jbo'IC rcfCfCRCod property for ingress and c~rc~, the Developer shJl1 compensate the City 1n the c.;'i!oun't of tAC CfJfHJcmnJtioFl judgment; except ',:her::c such jij~gmcAt exceeds the a~praisG~ value or 3YCrage of appraised yalues eRtercd into evidence iA t~e ceAdc~nat;on procccdlng ay tRe City, :tAG City and the Developer sRal1, subject to the mutual censcRt sf the City and t~c Dcyeloper as to the rca:oRableness of the judgment, share cquJlly (SO perccnt each) the a~o~Rt af tAc Judgment 3vlarded if] eJ(CC$S of S.~CA Jppra iscd va luc or avcrage---'l'J lblcs. The cost of construct1ng such connection to the adjoining property to the west, in add1tion to any other contributions for an-slte or off-S1te road improvements, will be the responslb)lity of the Developer according to a schedu 1 e to be estab 11 shed wi th the pre 1 1mi nary s 1 te plan approval of Subphase Al Phase I. rThis access has been acouired and constructed.l F, Sect ion 4. E. of the Development Order 1 s amended to read as fo llews: Prior to the approval of the initial final site plan for Subohase Al Ph~:c II funding commitments for construct1on from the governmental entlties responsible for construction of the following transportat1on lmprovements shall be made orl In the alternative, the Developer shall assume the financia 1 responsibility for lts proportionate share of the cost of construction of the transportat1on 1mprovements. (Substantlal revision; see Ordinance 3287-83 for oresent text:] 1. At the U. S. 19/Drew Street intersect 1 on construct a grade-separated interchange. This improvement has been committed to in the current 'Florlda Department of Transportation Adopted F1ve~Year Work Program and 1S scheduled for Fiscal Year '95/'96. In lieu of the funding commltment or the proportionate share of the construct1on cost, the following comml~rnents may be made: a . E xte nd Dru i dRaa d be twee n Be 1 cher Road and Eden v ill e Road. The cornplet1on of this improvement will proYlde a parallel reliever access for State Road 60 and Drew Street. [ThlS improvement has been completed.] b. Extend and wlden Drew Street as a four-lane divided 1 ink (four through lanes and turn lanes as are appropriate) between U.S. 19 and McMullen-Booth Road. [ThlS lmprovement has been completed.] 5 J."/J.U/~~ J.1l J.'I -u- ....... ...:! =-~ t_ t~\.'"\ c. Prior to the lssuance of the first certlficate of occupancy after the deve10pment generates 525 p.m. peak hour net external vehicle trips, the Developer shall provlde up to $125,000 to the Florlda Department of Transportation for the construction plans of the U.S. 19/Drew Street grade-separated interchange. [As of 12-19-91, the development generates 296 p.m. peak hour net external vehicle trips.] These funds shall be provided in order to obtain a commltment for the construction of the U.S. 19/Drew Street grade-separated lnterchange during Subphase A2. - 2. Construct access points to Park Place on Hampton Road as needed. Exclusive turn lanes and a traffic signal(s) may be needed. The cost of these improvements shall be the sole responslbility of the Developer. Pursuant to subsection 4.Z., the Developer shall pay the total cost of these improvements and the City shall assume the responslbility for constructing these improvements. 3. At the S.R. 60/Cleal""n'ater Mall Drive II lntersection construct two eastbound to northbound eXcluslve left turn lanes. The cost of these lmprovements shall be the sole responsibility of the Developer. Pursuant to subsectlon 4.Z., the Developer shall pay the total cost of these improvements and the Clty shall assume the respons lb, 1 1ty for construct lng these improvements. [This lmprovement has been completed.] 4. Install or renovate, as approprlate, traffic signals at the south project entrance and S.R. 60 and at Hampton Road and S.R. 60. The cost of these improvements shall be the sole responsibility of the Developer. Pursuant to subsection 4.Z., the Developer shall pay the total cost of these improvements and the City shall assume the responslbllity for constructing these lmprovements. [ThlS improvement has been completed.] 5. Construct an exclusive left turn lane on S.R. 60 approach and an additional through lane in each direction on S.R. 60 at its intersectlon with Hampton Road. The cost of these improvements sha 11 be the so 1 e respons i b i1 i ty of the Deve 1 oper. Pursuant to subsectlon 4.Z., the Developer shall pay the total cost of these lmprovements and the Clty shall assume the responsibility for constructlng these lmprovements. [These improvements are under constructlon.] , 6. Construct add it i ona 1 1 anes on State Road 60 from U. S. 19 to McMullen.Booth Road. [This improvement is under construction.] 7. At the Belcher Road/S.R. 60 intersection, construct an additlonal through lane and additional exclusive left and right turn lanes on all approaches. The through lanes shall be contlnued to the next intersection or some logical terminus in accordance with proper design practlce. Pursuant to subsect10n 4.Z., the Developer shall pay lts proportlonate share of the cost for constructlon of these lmprovements. 6 .~UQ7I012 I '1 I I I "1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I , I I I , I I I I , I I i 1 I I I I I I I I I 8. At the U.S. 19/5.R. 50 intersection, construct an eastbound to southbound exclusive right turn lane and in the westbound direct ion construct one additiona 1 exclusive left turn 1 ane. Pursuant to subsect ion 4. Z., the Deve laper sha 11 pay its proportionate share of the cost for construction of this improvement. 9. Improve Drew Street to a four-lane dwided arterial from U.S. 19 to N.E. Coachman Road, and add turn lanes at all signalized intersectlons in between. This improvement is commltted to ln the Metropolitan Planning Organization Transportation Improvement Program as being constructed in Fiscal Year 1992-93. G. Section 4.F. of the Development Order is amended to read as follows: Prior to the approval of the initial final site plan for Subphase A2 Pha:c II, funding commitments for construction from the governmental entities responsible for construction of the following transportation lmprovements shall be made or, in the a1ternative, the Developer shall assume the flnanclal responsibl1ity for its proportlonate share of the constructlon of the transportation improvements. [Substantlal revislon; see Ordinance 3287-83 for present text:] At the U. S. 19/N. E. Coachman Road (S. R. 590) ; ntersect i on construct a grade separated interchange, provided, however, such fac 111 ty S ha 11 not rema 1 n a condl t i on of approva 1 1 f TBRPC IS transportation policles are amended or the Developer. at the 1nitiatlon of Subphase A2, agrees to prepare and submit traffic conditlon lnformation documentlng that the lmprovements are no longer necessary to mitigate regional impacts. H. Section 4.G. of the Development Order is amended to read as follows: Prior to the approva1 of the initial final site plan for Suhohase A3 PhJ~c JIl, funding commitments for construction from the governmental entities responsible for construction of the following transportation improvements shall be made or, in the alternat1ve, the Developer shall assume the financial responsibility for its proport ionate share of the cost' of construct ion of the transportation improvements. [Substantial revision: see Ordinance 3287-83 for present text:) 1. Construct addit ional access to Park Place on Hampton Road as needed. ExcluSlve turn lanes and a traffic s;gnal(s) may be needed. The cost of these improvements shall be the sole responsibility of the Developer. Pursuant to subsection 4.Z., the Deve10per sha11 pay the total cost of these improvements and the 7 ~/y;Z -'7 I flI 009/012 I '1 I I I '-1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 12/10/93 16'113 'B' City shall assume improvements. 2 Install and/or relocate addltlonal trafflc signals in the project area at Drew Street and the north project entrance, Drew Street and Hampton Road, the two south project entrances and State Road 60, and State Road 60 and Hampton Road. These improvements are to be made in phases as is appropr1ate, but in their enti~ty by Su b phas e A3. The cos t of these imp roveme nt s sh a 11 be the so 1 e responslb1lity of the Developer. Pursuant to subsection 4.Z., the Developer shall pay the total cost of these improvements and the City shall assume the responsibility for constructing these improvements. (These improvements are completed except for Drew Street and the north project entrance, and Drew Street and Hampton Road. ) the responsibility for constructing these 3. Expand Hampton Road to a tWOM 1 ane d iv i ded 1 ink (two through lanes wlth turnlng lanes as approprlate) from State Road 60 to Drew Street 1n phases related to pOlnts of access on Hampton Road, but in its ent; rety by Subphase A3. The cost of th i 5 improvement sha 11 be the so 1 e respons 1 b 11 ity of the Developer. Pursuant to subsection 4.2., the Developer shall pay the total cost of these improvements and the City shall aSSume the responsibility of constructing the improvement. This improvement 1S scheduled by the City of Clearwater for its '92/193 Fiscal Year. 4. At the U.S. 19/5unset Point Road 1ntersectlon construct a grade separated interchange, pray 1 ded, however, such fac 111 ty shall not remain a condition of approval if TBRPC's transportatlon polic1es are amended or the Developer, at the initiation of Subphase A3 agrees to prepare and submit traffic condition lnformation documenting that the improvements are no longer necessary to mitigate regional impacts. I. Not later than 90 days after the effective date of this ordinance, Developer shall pay to the Clty the sum of $383,393.00, together wlth lnterest a t the rate of ten per ce nt per annum from De cembe r 8 r 1983. Th 1 S payment, together with the prev i ous transportat ion mit; gat lOn payment made pursuant to the Development Order, is 1n full satisfaction of Developer1s obligatlons under Sections 4.E.2 through 4.E.5, 4.E.7, 4.E.8, 4.G.l through 4.G.3, and 4.Z of the Development Order as amended by this ~rd1nance~ . J. The build-out year is hereby extended by five (5) years through 1996. This results in an extenslon of the bUlld~out of Phase I by 11 years, from 1985 to 1996; an extension of the build~out of Phase II by 8 years, from 1988 to 1996; and an extenslon of the bUlld-out of Phase III by 5 years, from 1991 to 1996. K. Section 4.I. lS hereby repealed. l. The amendments s ta ted here in, to gether with all pre v 1 au s amen dments , do not constitute a substantial deviation, pursuant to Chapter 380.06, Florida Statutes 8 I I I I I I I I I I I. I I I I I I I. I 12/10/93 18.17 ~ ~ 010/012 M. Noth1ng herein shall limlt or modify the rights originally approved by the Development Order or the protection afforded under Section 163.3167(8), Florida Statutes, except to the extent that specific rights and protections are 11m; ted or mod if i ed by the proposed amendments to the Deve lopment Order as approved by this ordinance. N. The City Clerk shall send copies of this ordinance, within five (5) days following the effective date hereof, to Building Operating Holding Company, DCA and TBRPC. O. This ordinance shall be deemed rendered upon transmittal of copies hereof to the Departmen t of Commu n i ty A ff airs an d the Tampa Bay Reg ion alP 1 ann i ng Counei 1. P. Not i ce of adopt i on of th; s ord in ance s hall be recorded by the Developer in the public records of Pinel1as County, Florida, as provided in Section 380.06, Florida Statutes. Sectlon 5. Effectlve Date. This ordinance shall take effect 45 days after copies have been transm1tted to the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council and the Florida Department of Community Affa1rs, unless this ordinance ;s appealed, 1n which event this ordinance shall not take effect until such appeal has been decided. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED AS AMENDED November 4, 1991 December 19, 1991 R1ta Garvey Mayor-Commissioner Attest: ~~.~~ jg1) Cynt . Go au - f I -0 City Clerk Approved as to form and correctness: . ' ~ 9 .....,; ",. :.... ~~ ...._ ..._.. oiIIio,.........."._. .: .....'''''-: .::-...... _ JI' .. :t lfe:.reh).- c:mUfyth~.;s Olio tnie ~ ipd ~t ~ ~ rorl,lttn& u it- :. -p~ m:1he.!i1U..af..1b5<-~.;l :.. -c.1e'.I1'W1tei. Wttn~ -Ul.y ~ a"od: -:-ofhcial $e:U otthe CIty of CIar.v.tCtr. ~i-of J'MlII.A.'1 .l993.. -':._-,,;;....~ ..."/,, . ~ DREW STREET 1 r--' .-. .-. . . .-. . .-. .-._. . fV75J f8t-- ! /' ./ ~I iff v I I ! ~. -).I-'n .,., I i~ '~, ..=: . 0 Ie \ \ "I'\. I I \ 'II 1 ," , : "Ir..;;;, I / I A .....__ ~ I F" 'I o I ~ '0 o i ~ IA!~ li~-;. ~.(~._. ._~_.~~;._._._._.~, ~'-W;::~/,' FI -?' ;li ~ J '~f( I J.~ I .r h A I~ I ~ \,,' (II 'nl) ~? ~o~5;;~' ~ ...., i i ., ;\ "'" '~ ',' . . ~ r- ~"iv I &':O_Oi ~~~~ ~ Q.(~l, _ 0 C ( 0 i i )7: 1 ..~~~~- i i ~ D C rr--u D-- ~ &--- /"> i ~ XIS '~i ~ [ ... ~ ~~._._._~ \\~.. n-i -7 I D // C:( M III ~I 1~1~(~ I ! C I I ~ (~ETI I ( ~ 3' _~'-'_l .-.-. .. ._ =-. ._. ~~~~.~ SR 60 LEGEND '; [21 []ill g ~ OFFICE 803,000sf COMMERCIAL 1 SO,000s1 1 I ..J INDUSTRIAL 200,OOOsl PROPOSED ACCESS ~X"'CT lOCATION OF ENTRANCES/EXITS TO BE DEl ERMLHEO OUR IN G F LHAl SITE P L A H AP PROY At) -, , . 1 J GULF - TO-e A Y 60 ULEV A RD NOTES CD IIIAXIIIIW OF 2 OUTPAAeEtS @ IIIAXI).I\Aol OF 1 OUTPARt:ElS @) ACe.E1S FRO'" SR la SIl&.ltCT TO FOOT AJ>PflOYAL 1ft Fld ~ En.....'...... .....:..te.': UO' ~~~fr{ [P)[L~cg~ t saa AMENDED MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN EXHIBIT oBo I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I EXHIBIT A-2 CITY OF CLEARWATER ORDINANCE NO. 5722-95 APPROVING DRI DEVELOPMENT ORDER AMENDMENT (ffDRI92.9S) 8 "1 '\ I.... ... ~ ... , . I i ~ ORDINANCE NO. 5722~95 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO 3205-83, AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE NO 3287-83 AND OROINANCE NO 5142-91, A DEVELOPMENT ORDER ISSUED PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 380, FLORIDA STATUTES, FOR PARK PLACE, A DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT, PROVIDING FINDINGS OF FACT; PROVIDING CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENT OF THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER TO CHANGE THE PHASING OF THE DEVELOPMENT, DECREASE OFFICE DEVELOPMENT, CLARIFY THE DEVELOPMENT ENTITLEMENTS ALLOCATED TO EACH PARCEL OF THE DEVELOPMENT, EXTEND THE BUILD- OUT DATE, ADO A CONVERSION FACTOR FOR OFFICE, INDUSTRIAL AND MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, REVISE CERTAIN CONDITIONS OF THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER CONCERNING TRANSPORTA. TION MITIGATION AND OTHER PROVISIONS OF THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER, AND RESTATE ALL REMAINING TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT OBLIGATIONS OF THE DEVELOPER, INCLUDING THE OBLIGATION TO DEDICATE AND CONSTRUCT PARK PLACE BOULEVARD, DETERMINING THAT SAID AMENDMENTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE ADOPTED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, PROVIDING FOR PROPER NOTICE OF PROPOSED ENACTMENT; AND PROVIDING ~ FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF tHIS ORDINANCE. . I I I I . I . I I I I WHEREAS, on September 1, 1983, the CIty Commission adopted Ordinance No. 3205-83 (the "Development Order") which ordinance constitutes a development order for Park Place, a development of regional Impact, affecting the property described on ExhIbit "Ail attached hereto and Incorporated hereIn (the ~Development"); and WHEREAS, on October 20, 1983, the City CommIssion adopted Ordinance No. 3287 -83, an amendment to the Development Order and readopted Ordinance 3287-83 on December 8, 1983; and WHEREAS, on December 19, 1991, the City Commission adopted Ordinance No 5142-91, an Amendment to the Development Order; and ,-5" 7 d:J _ ;' f "\ WHEREAS, on August 29, 1994, Storz OphthalmlCS, Inc, and BUIldIng Operation Holding Company, the owners of certaIn undeveloped areas of the Development, filed an applicatIon entitled "Notlficatlon of a Proposed Change to a PrevIously Approved Development of RegIonal Impact ("DRI") pursuant to SubsectIon 380 06( 19), Florida Statutes" (the "NOPC") with the CIty of Clearwater (the .Clty.), with copIes provIded to the Tampa Bay Regional Plannmg Council rTBRPC.) and the Flonda Department of CommunIty Affairs (the -DCA-); and WHEREAS, the NOpe proposes to amend the Development Order to (i) amend the phaSing of the development from one phase wIth three subphases to one phase with no subphases, (il) decrease office development by 7,480 square feet; (iil) clarify the development entitlements allocated to each parcel of the Development; (iv) extend the build-out date by four (4) years, (v) add a conversion factor for the conversion of approved office development to multi-family residential development and the conversion of approved industrial development to either office development or multi- famlly residential development, (VI) amend certain Development Order conditions to reflect changes In the transportatIon network affectec' by the Development, (VII) restate all remaInIng transportation Improvement obllgatlons of the Developer, including the obligatIon to dedicate and construct Park Place Boulevard; and (viii) amend certain proVIsions of the Development Order to be consistent With changes descnbed In the NOpe (collectIvely, the -Proposed Changes"); and WHEREAS, the ownership of the Development IS as shown on ExhIbit .8" attached hereto and Incorporated hereln, and WHEREAS, portIOns of the Development are Individually referred to herein by the Parcel Numbers shown on ExhIbit "B" attached hereto and Incorporated herein, and WHEREAS, certain of the Proposed Changes, combined with previous amendments to the Development Order, are presumed to create a substantial deviatIOn, pursuant to Subsection 380 06(19), Florida Statutes; and WHEREAS, the NOpe has satisfactorily addressed all regional Issues related to the Development and the presumptIon of a substantial deViation has been rebutted, and WHEREAS, the City Commission, as the governIng body of the local government having jurrsdiction pursuant to Chapter 380, FlOrida Statutes, IS authorized and empowered to consIder applications for proposed changes to previously approved ORIs, and WHEREAS, the publiC notice requirements of Chapter 380, Flonda Statutes, and the City have been satisfied, and 2 ..--7...,..., ~I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ", Il .1 , Ii I I I I Ii , ) ) Ii I ) '\ WHEREAS, the CIty CommissIon has revIewed the NOPC, as well as all related testimony and eVidence submitted by each party and members of the general pUblIc BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA Section 1 Introduction. ThiS Ordinance shall constItute an amendment to the Park Place Development Order as prevIously amended Section 2 FindinQs. The City CommIssion, having received all related comments, testimony and evidence submItted by each party and members of the general publIC, finds that there IS substantial competent eVidence to support the followmg findIngs of fact: A. The Park Place Development Order, as adopted by Ordinance No 3205- 83, and amended by Ordinances No. 3287..83 and No. 5142-91, , is a valid final development order wlthm the provisions of Section 1633167(8). Flonda Statutes, affectlng the property descnbed on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and Incorporated herein I I B Storz Ophthalmlcs, lnc, and Building Operation Holding Company, the owners of certain undeveloped areas of the Development as shown on ExhIbit "B,. have proposed the following amendments to the Development Order: 1 Modifying the phasing of the development to one phase WIth no subphases from one phase With three subphases, and 2 . Decreasing office development by 7,480 square feet; and 3 Clarifying the development rentitlements allocated to each parcel of the Development; and 4. Extending the build-out date by four (4}-- years, a cumulative extension of nine (9) years; and - I . I , . I 5. Adding a conversion factor for the conversion of certain approved office development to multi~family resIdential development and the conversion of approved Industrial development to either office development or multi-family residential development; and 6. Deleting or modifying certain Development Order conditions to reflect changes In the transportation network affected by the Development; and 3 ~7J:2 -0 C .1 I I I I I I I I I I I The Development as modified herei~. and as depicted on the Revised Map I H, Master Plan, attached hereto as ExhibIt .C," will not unreasonably interfere WIth the achievement of the objectives of the adopted state land I d evelopmem pi an...appltcabl e to. the a rea. . _ ____ _ ~ _ ~ I I I I I '" \ 7. Restating all remaining transportation improvement obligations of the Developer, Including the obligation to dedicate and construct Park Place Boulevard, and 8 ModIfying certain proVIsions of the Development Order to be consistent WIth changes described in the NOpe A comprehensive review of the Impacts generated by the Proposed Changes, together With all prevIous amendments, has been conducted by the City's departments, the TBRPC and the DCA D. The Proposed Changes are not located In an area of cntlcal state concern designated as such pursuant to Section 380 OS, Flonda Statutes (1993). E The Proposed Changes, together with all previous amendments, do not Increase the external traffic Impact of the development, nor do they create additional Impacts on other public facilities, mduding water. wastewater, drainage, solld waste, recreation and mass transit, from the original projectIons set forth In the ApplicatIOn for Development Approval ("ADA") F. The Proposed Changes heretofore approved are determined not to be a substantial deviation to the Development Order. Section 3 ConclUSions of Law - The CIty CommISSion, havIng made the above findings of fact, reaches the follOWIng conclUSions of law B. C. D. A. The Development as bUilt to date is consistent with the local comprehensIve plan and local land development regufattons under which It was developed The Proposed Changes are consistent with the local land development regulations currently in effect The Proposed Changes, together With all previous amendments, do not create a reasonable likelihood of additional Impact or any type of regIonal impact not previously reviewed by the TBRPC and DCA, over those treated under the Development Order. The Proposed Changes, therefore, do not constitute a "substantIal deviation" from the Development Order, pursuant to Chapter 380.06, FlOrida Statutes The Proposed Changes are exempt 4 I I! i Ii Ii I I I II I I II t I I II , I I I I II I! I Ii I , I! ~, / > '\ 1 from the provIsions of OrdInance No. 4983-90, City of Clearwater and the Park Place DRI remains vested thereunder E NothIng herein shall limit or modify the fights oflgmally approved by the Development Order or the protectIon afforded under Section 163 3167(8), Flonda Statutes, except to the extent that specific nghts and protections are limited or modIfied by the Proposed Changes to the Development Order as approved by thIs ordinance F. The Proposed Changes are within the threshold guidelines of Ordinance 4983-90 of the City, relating to determInations of vested development rights, and the Park Place DRI remains vested thereunder G These proceedings have been duly conducted pursuant to applicable law and regulations, and based upon the record in these proceedIngs, the vanous departments of the City, Storz Ophthalmlcs, Inc., Building Operation Holding Company and other owners of the Development are authonzed to approve/conduct development as descnbed herein H. The review by the City, the TBRPC, and other partIcIpating agencies and Interested citIzens reveals that Impacts are adequately addressed pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 380, Flonda Statutes. Section 4 Order - Having made the above findings of fact and drawn the above conclusions of law, It is ordered that the Development Order be amended as follows. A The Conceptual Plan descnbed In SectIons 4 A. and 4 J of the Development Order IS amended as shown on Exhibit "C" attached hereto and incorporated herein. All references to the Conceptual Plan set forth In the Development Order shaff refer to the Amended Conceptual Plan attached hereto as Exhibit "C." t' B Section 4.C. of the Development Order is amended to read. 4.C. The Project IS approved for a total maximum floor area of 1,145,520 square feet, compnsed of a maximum 795,520 square feet of office use, a maxImum 200,000 square feet of industrial use and a maxImum 150,000 square feet of retail commercial use, subject to the converSion factor set forth 10 Subsection Q The permItted maximum floor area IS to be approved subject to the FAR hmitations set forth below C Sectron 4.C.1. of the Development Order IS amended to add the follOWing sentence No FAR IS applicable to multi-family residential use. " 5 S-).2.:/ < '\ '\ :1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I D Section 4 C 2 of the Development Order is amended to read' The PrOject shall consIst of one phase as follows Completion Maximum Floor Area in S_quare Feet Year RETAJL COMMERCIAL OFFICE INDUSTRIAL TOTAL 150,000. 795,520- 200,000'" 1,145,520 2000 .1ncludes 55.278 square feet eXIsting as of 8/1/94 "Includes 120560 square feet eXlStlng as of 8/1/94 -.Includes 100,000 square feet exlstlng as of 8/1/94 The above development IS allocated among the parcels descnbed on ExhIbit ~B. attached hereto and incorporated herem as follows: -- -- PARCEL No. RETAIL COMMERCIAL OFFice INDUSTRIAL 1 200,000 2 171,400 3 258,700 4 60,000 5 120,560 6 120,000 7 60,000 8 124,860 9 5,000 10 10,000 , 11 15,000 TOTALS 150,000 795,520 200,000 MAXIMUM FLOOR AREA IN SaUARE FeET --The--owner of a parcel to which development rights are allocated may assign all or part of those development nghts to another parcel or parcels so long as the land use deSIgnation of the parcef to which the assIgnment IS made permits development of the rights assigned. E. Section 4.E. of the Development Order is amended to read. Prior to the approval of the frrst~ final site plan for the Development after the effectIve date of thIS OrdrnanceSubphose ^ 1, funding commitments (or construction (rom the governmental entities responsible for construction of the follOWIng transportatIon improvements shall be made or, In the alternative, the Developer shall assume the financial 6 ~~ - - I' . , . I ~ ~ I I I I , I I I I I , '\ Best c~~onslblllty for Its proportIonate share of the cost of constructIon of the ~~rtatlon Improvements A ~ Al tho U S 19/0,"w Slraollntorcecllon conctrucl 3 gr3de oep3r3tod Interch,:mgo Thu; impra'/omont h3S boon committed to In the current FlOrida Doportment of Tr:msportJ.tlon Adopted FIve YC::lF \Nork Progr:1m :md is scheduled for FICC:11 YO:1r 'gSr9S In IIOU of tho fundIng commitment or tho proportlon:Jte sh~ro of tho construction cost, tho followmg commitments may bo m:Jde. ,J Extend Druid Rood bOPNoon Bolcher RO:Jd ::md Edenvllle RO::Id The completion of this improvement lN1!1 provide ~ p:Jr::JlIol rehover :lccess for St:lto RO:Jd eO ::Ind Draw Street [ThiS Improvemont h:Js boon completod.] b Extend :lnd Widen Ora'^, Stroot :J: ::J four !:Jne diVided link (four tMra ugh l:lne s ::md turn !:Joes :lS ::Ire :Jpproprr::Ite) borNoon U S 1 9 :Jnd McMullan Booth RO:Jd [ThiS Improvement h:lc been c:Jmpletcd ] c Prior to tho Iccu:mco of the first ccrtlfi~tc of occup:lncy .:lftcr the dO'/elopmcnt gencr.:ltes 525 p m peok hour net externol ',chicle tripS, tho Dovoloper sh:J11 provido up to $12S,OOO to tho Florid:l Deportment of Tr:lnsport:ltion for the construction pl3ns of tho U. S 19/Drow Street gr:Jde ccp.:lr3ted Ir.torchonga As of 12/~ 9/01, tho dc',olopment gcncr:Jte.s 296 p l.l. pO::lk hour not extern:ll ',chicle trips Thece funde eh:J1I be proVided In order to obt::Jln 0 commitment for the construction of the U S 1 g/Draw Street gr:lde cep~r::Jtad intorch::mge during Subph:l~c 1\2 to 1~. Construct access pOInts to Park Place on Hampton Road as needed. Exclusive turn lanes and a traffic signal(s) may be needed The cost of these Improvements shall be the sole responsibility of the Developer. Pursuant to subsection 4 Z., the Developer has patdsh::J11 poy the total cost of these improvements and the City shall assume th~ responsibility for constructIng these Improvements ~3 At the S R 60/Clc3rN-::lter M311 Orl'/O II IntersectIon cons~ruct rHO eastbound to northbound exclusive left ~urn l:Jnns The coet of theee improvements chait bo the solo responclbillty of the Developer Pursu::mt to subsectIon 1.2 I the Doveloper sh:J1l p:JY tho totJI cost ot thece Improvements ond tho City sh:J11 assume the respenclblllty for constructing those Impro'.'omentc. [ThiS Improvement h3s been comploted 1 7 a+:. 8 29. 1 I I II II I I I II I I I I I I I I I I I 'I >:1 Install or renovate, as appropnate, traffic signals at the souJh.proJ8ct entrance and S R 60 and at Hampton Road and S R 60 The cost of these Improvements shall be the sole responsIbility of the Developer. Pursuant to subsection 4 Z, the Developer has paldsh:lll p.:i)l the total cost of these Improvements and the City shall assume the responsibility for constructing these Improvements. (This Improvement has been completed 1 ~a Construct an exclUSive left turn lane on S R 60 approach and an addItional through lane In each directIon on S R 60 at its Intersection With Hampton Road. The cost of these Improvements shall be the sole responsibility of the Developer Pursuant to subsection 4 Z., the Developer has paldsh311 p:lY the total cost of these Improvements and the City shall assume the responsibility for constructing these Improvements (These Improvements have been comoleted.:iro undor constructIon.] 4$ Construct additional lanes on State Road 60 from U S 19 to McMullen-Booth Road. rrhls Improvement has been comoletedis under construction.} At the Belcher ReadJS.R. 60 intersection, construct aA-addltional eastbound and westbound through lane~ ana additional exclUSive left .:ind :1g;,t turn lanes on all approaches, and an additional nqht turn lane on the northbound and southbound aooroacnes The through lanes shall be continued to the next intersectIon or some logIcal termInus In accordance With proper design practice Pursuant to subsection 4.2., the D~veloper has paidsh.:ill p.:iy its proportIonate share of the cost for construction of these Improvements. ^~ the U S 19/5 R. eO intersection, construct .:in eastbound to southbou:1d exclUSive nght turn I3nc .:ind In the westbound direction construct ana ::lddltlonal exclusivo loft turn lana Pursu:lnt to subsectron 1 Z , the Devoloper SM3ll pay its J:lroportlOn:1to sh.:iro of the cos~ fur c~m;tructlan of this Improvement. Improve Drew Street to a four-lane divided arterial from US. 19 to N E. Coachman Road, and add turn lanes at all SIgnalized Intersections in betv.reen. A fundinQ commitment has been made for +!hls Improvement which is proQrammed for constructloncommlttod te In the Metropolttan Planning OrganIzation TransportatIon Improvement Program for3s being constru~ed In fiscal year 1995/1996'92/'03. 8 C:-7..,.., Q_ I I , , I I I I I I I I , I I I I I I I J. K L. ~ \ F. Subsection 4 F of the Development Order IS hereby deleted G Subsectlon 4 G 1 IS hereby deleted H. Subsectton 4 G 2. of the Development Order IS amended to read 2. Install and/or relocate additional traffic SIgnals in the project area at Drew Street and the north project entrance, Drew Street and Hampton Road, the two south project entrances and State Road 60, and State Road 60 and Hampton Road. These improvemonts :lrc to bo m:J.de In ph:1ses .::IS IS .::Ipprepriotc, but in tholr ontIrety by Subph:1cO AJ The cost of these Improvements shall be the sole responsIbility of the Developer Pursuant to subsection 4 Z.o the Developer has oaidsh:J.11 p:J.y the total cost of these improvements and the City shall assume the responslblJJty for constructing these improvements. [These improvements are completed except for DFCW Street .:Ind tho north prOjoct cntr:1ncc .:md Drew Stroot ::Ind H.:Jmpton R03d.} I. Subsection 4.G 3 IS amended to read as follows. 3 Expand Hampton Road to a two-lane diVIded link (two through lanes WIth turning lanes as appropnate) from State Road 60 to Drew Street In phases related to pOints of access on Hampton Road, but in Its entirety by Subphase A3 The cost of thIS Improvement shall be the sole responslbrllty of the Developer Pursuant to subsectIon 4.Z., the Developer has paidshQll p3)' the total cost of these Improvements and the City shall assume the responsibility of constructIng the improvement. A fundinq commItment has been made for +!his rmproveme:nt whIch is scheduled by the City of Clearwater for its 1994/1995 'g2f9a Fiscal Year. Subsection 4.G 4 is hereby deleted. The Developer has paid its proportionate share of transportatIon improvements in accordance With revised SubsectIons 4 E 1 through 4.E 3, 4.E.5, 4 G.2, 4'G 3 and 4 Z. of the Development Order The only remainrng obligation of the Developer concerning the transportation improvements IS contaIned In SubsectIon 4 8 8. of the Development Order, as set forth In SectIon 4.N. of thiS Ordinance The bUIld-out year is hereby extended by a cumulatIve period of nine (9) years through 2000 9 5- } :?.::2 . ~ N. " I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I '\ M The followIng subsection IS added to the Development Order as Subsection 4AA A.A ConversIon factors to permIt 1,000 square feet of office development to convert to 2.44 unIts of multi-family resIdential development and/or 1,000 square feet of Industnal development to convert to eIther (i) 633 square feet of office development or (if) 1 54 units of multl~famlly resIdentIal development are hereby established for the office and Industrial areas shown as Parcels 1, 2, 3 andlor 8 on ExhIbit "8" Notwithstanding the foregoing, (I) multl-famJ/y resIdentIal development shall be permitted on Parcels 2, 3 and/or 8 only; (II) reference to Parcel 2 herein speCIfically excludes the portion of Parcel 2 which [s designated as "PreservatIOn"; and (Hi) development shall be limited as follows; MINIMUM T MAXIMUM Industrial 100,000. I 200,000. Office 240,560. r 858,820" Multi-family ReSIdentIal 0- I 510- .square feet of fioor area -Units Thirty (30) days prIor to issuance of any permit whIch utilizes the conversIon factors, DCA and TBRPC shall receive notIce, from the Devefoper, of the proposed use of the conversIon ratro. The follOWing subsectIon 1s added to the Development Order as Subsection 4.8.8: l" 1. The portion of Park Place Boulevard shown as Parcel A on Exhibit "B. shall be dedicated to and accepted by the City prior to issuance of any development permit for any portIon of Parcels 4, 5, 6 and 7 shown on ExhIbit "B,. but In no event later than ninety (90) days after the effective date of this Ordinance. The City will cease to Issue any and all bUIlding permIts and development approvals for Parcels 4, 5, 6 and 7 upon failure to comply wIth this Subsection B 8.1. 2. The portIon of Park Place Boulevard shown as Parcel A on ExhibIt -B" shall be completely constructed in accordance wIth the City's specIficatIons on or before the earlIer of the fOllOWIng- 10 I I 1\ I I: i II I I! I~ I' I ~ I O. ~ . , I I I ~ (i) Issuance of a certificate of occupancy for any portion of the parcels designated Parcels 4 or 6 on Exhibit "B", or (II) December 31, 1998. The City will cease to Issue any building permits or development approvals for Parcels 4, 5, 6, or 7, upon failure to comply wIth this Subsectron B B 2. 3 The portIOns of Park Place Boulevard adjoining Parcels 1, 2 and 3 shown on ExhibIt "B" which have been dedicated shall be completely constructed In accordance with the City'S specifications on or before the earlier of the followIng: (I) issuance of a certificate of occupancy for any portion of the parcels designated Parcels 2 or 3 shown on Exhibit .B~, or (il) December 31, 1998 The City Will cease to issue any building permits or development approvals for Parcels 1, 2, or 3 upon failure to comply with this Subsection B.B 3. The follOWing subsection is added to the Development Order as Subsection 4.C.C. C.C. In order to facilitate mass transit service to the Park Place development, the Developer WIll work with the Plnellas Suncoast Transit Authonty rpSTAn) as follows' 1. PSTA IS allowed to run buses through the development in order to serve Park Place from both Drew Street and Gulf-to- Bay Boulevard. 2. The Developer grants permiSSion to PSTA for the on-site installation of bus stops, benches, and shelters along the maIn roadway connecting Drew Street and Gulf-te-Bay Boulevard 3. The Developer shall endeavor to notIfy PSTA at least two (2) months In advance of build-out, In order for PSTA to revise the necessary routes and schedules, install bus stops, passenger benches, and passenger shelters II ~7;J;)--; 12 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I " ~ 1"" ; P. The fOllowIng subsection IS added to the Development Order as Subsection 400 o 0 The City may not adjust the green tIme for State Road 60 at the Bennlgan's drrveway to account for Development traffic If such adjustment would result In an unacceptable level of service on State Road 60 Q. The following IS added to Subsection 5 A of the Development Order, as an additional item to be contained In the annual report. 6 A cumulatIve report of trade.offs made pursuant to SubsectIon 4 AA hereof durrng the reporting year. R. The amendments stated herein, together WIth all previous amendments, do not constItute a substantial deVIation, pursuant to Chapter 380 06, Flonda Statutes S. Nothmg herein shall limIt or modify the rrghts orrglnally approved by the Development Order or the protectIon afforded under Section 163.3167(8), Florrda Statutes, except to the extent that speCIfic nghts and protections are limIted or modified by the proposed amendments to the Development Order 2S approved by thIS ordinance. T. The CIty Clerk shall send caples of thIS ordinance, WIthin five (5) days after passage of thIS ordinance on second reading to Storz Ophthalmlcs, Inc., Building Operation Holding Company, DCA and TBRPC. U. This ordinance shall be deemed rendered upon transmittal of copies hereof to the TBRPC and the DCA. :- V. NotIce of adoption of this ordinance shall be recorded by the Developer in the public records of Pinellas County, Florida, as prOVided in Section 380 06, Flonda Statutes Section 5 Effective Date ThIS ordinance shall take effect 45 days after copies have been transmItted to the T.ampa Bay Regional Planning Council and the Flonda ~7.., )_,.....,,..- I I I j I , I I I I, , , If I II I Ii ! I II I' I I . . 1 '\ Department of Community Affairs unless thiS ordinance IS appealed, in whIch event thIS ordInance shall not take effect until such appeal has been decided PASSED ON FIRST READING Januarv 5t 1995 PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Attest: I JJ9c' D. ,..,. ~ Cynt a 'E. Goudeau CIty Clerk ' Approved as to form and correctness: ~ - I hereby cert!fy tbt th!t fs a trn& and CCImlCt copy r:l the oriR::Iml u rt appears in tho files of the 9tY of Cl~. WItnes.I my hsDd .and t!~..~~~~ :pu, fd&y oi ,. ~ AhAl , ~k.q.?/1 ~1' lil4- Pamela K Akin CIty Attorney Exhibit "A" - Legal Description exhibit "B" - Ownership Exhibit IIC. - Revised Map H ,. #0022230 01 d.ll 32112.91761 #0022230 01 13 ~7 'J ~ "'" "1 , EXHIBIT '"A'" TO ORDINANCE NO 5722-95 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PARK PLACE Commence at the center of SectIon 17, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Pinel/as County, Flonda and go S 89046'01'" W, 660 00 feet, along the South boundary of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17 (the East-West centerline of saId Sechon 17,) thence N 00019'21" W, 5000 feet, to a pOInt on the North nght-of-way line of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard - State Road 60 for a POINT OF BEGINNING, thence, following said North nght-of-way line, S 89046'01'" W, 5849 feet; thence N 00013'59'" W, 1000 feet, thence S 29046'01'" W, 131921 feet, thence, leaving said North rrght-of-way line, N 01004'04'" E, 59999 feet, thence S 89046'01" W, 19843 feet, thence N 00052'21'" E, 554.70 feet; thence S 89054'49'" W, 40006 feet, to a pOint on the East right-of-way line of U S Highway 19, thence, followIng said East nght-.of.way lIne, N 01004'04'" E, 28 15 feet; thence along a cur<.te to the rrght that has a radius of 192.00 feet, an arc length of 72.82 feet, a chord length of 72 39 feet, a chord beanng of N 11056'04'" E, thence N 22047'58" E, 11 93 feet, thence along a CU/'Ve to the left that has a radius of 238 00 feet, an arc length of 16 13 feet, a chord length of 16 13 feet, a chord beanng of N 20051'27'" E, to a pOint on the North boundary of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 17; thence, leaving saId East right-.of-way line of U S. Highway 19, N 89054'49- E, 1222.19 feet, along the North boundary of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of saId SectJOn 17 to the Southwest corner of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of saId Section 17; thence N 00022'28" E, 1337 33 feet, along the West boundary of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of SectIon 17 to the Northwest comer of said Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4, thence S 89056'11" E, 1312.06 feet, along the North boundary of said Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 to a pOint on the West nght-of-way 'lne of Hampton Road - County Road 144, thence S 00.19'21" E, 2337.71 fee~ along said West right-of-way line; thence S 89046'01'" W, 627.00 feet; thence 5 00010'21- E, 280.00 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING, containing 99.133 acres, more or less. Subject to easements and nghts-of-way of record Information taken from Su/'Vey by Uoveras, Baur & Stevens, Consulting Englneers.Land Surveyors, Clearwater, Flonda, February 23, 1982. ::;-'7 _ ') '1 .1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -"? - ) "\ \ . I' c.n A- (..) N .... ~ le- I I .... ...... ...... -- .... I ....., ....., ....., ....., ""'-l m , KJ , , I ..., N N N I'\) ~ (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 , , I I . .... ..... ...... ...... ...... Q) en 0') en (j) . I , , I , , 0 Cl a OJ co CD a a c.n c.n <.n Z a a (J'1 (J'1 c.n 0 I C"n a A- .l:lo. .b. a a CD CD (j) . , I I , I N N 0 0 a br. w 0 a a 0 a a Cl Cl , I I I I 0 ....a. a 0 a 01 w a 0 a I a a (.oJ N ...... 0 a 0 a a ..... " 0 1:. 0 ::c ..., I " a. - m "'C' :J QI X r- ::s ::I: 'r- 1::- 0 1'-' C") (tl m m z =i 0 o :: :E .OJ (.n .. I z ..... .. m t\J ::c N , ()r-.J'"Q DN'"Q ()Ncn ()Ncn C")NCt.l i en to Q ...... Q) o ..... Q) - .... - - .... - -......- t1'I ..., N..., ..., N.., (D 0 CD 0 CD Q m....'A CD .... 'A m'"QN m "'C'N m "'0 N G)"'C'Jt O"'C''''O ~~O ~!!lo i~o aJOQ) mOtu m;r.- OJ A "'C m ""'C C":JO CT:JO - "'0"0 m""O::r m""O::r CD_:T _nco _OlD :"m;:r ..., -- ..., -- CD CD CD <DCDm - m::r - lD::r "T1~lD .."Om .."nm _en c. c _0 0.- r - r<D3 rCD- ~ "TtCD= -n(D~ m3 m3 rrS: aJ _0 r- r-. (..)-0 (..)-0 w -0 <D :J w~!:: .l:lo.<(n A<(n .bo.<(IJ UJOCQ Q)P-- CD c.. 0> P-- (..):J,.... W:Ja. -'zS" -Io.z- ......z5" ....m- ......OJ CO. P CO. ~ CO. P w_a. w_ A< . A< P- a. I: / I 1\ , I: PAGE 1 OF 4 S-7d.d ~-7S- / " " I ) . I -. co CD ~ OJ ~I - 0 I -. ...... I ...... ...... ...... ...... ....,. ....,. ............ ...... ....,. I I N~ ~ I N N f\,J <0 <0 co'" <0 <0 , I , . , . ...... ...... ...... ...... ..... ...... 0) OJ mOl m 01 , , I , I , 0 en 00 0 0 0 <0 00 0 0 I 0 w 00 0 0 0 <0 00 0 0 0 N 00 0 '0 , I NN '" '" I\) 0 w 0 ww W .I::tr. I 0 ...... 00 0 0 , , I I I I ...... 0 00 ...... 0 0 0 N...... ...... A 0 ...... 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 I I I '-l I I ocn......)>Q.s: ONen~ "'O~OQ.CJ (")N"'O ON-cr I .... c: ...... - 0 QJQ)c;o =:;;;:,oe o ...... QJ o ...... QJ --......S c ;-8(1)r- ur;S:Q)"'Oa. .... l\J .... .., N .... ~ a; .. -cr () 1'D......", m......"", a. Z .... .tn az ~ ~ g-)>"'Ozs Gi-cr~ G)1J3! I ......O~o)> .0 0 :z. m < en """'c:.......t.. 'i:Q < Z (") CQ 1'D 0 OJ mOm r o - en .. ~ ("')::0 0 C"~o- O":ro "TTo::r< 0.0 X-crr- ~ · O_CDO ::r = "'OC-aCD"'O - 0 CD,_ -nOJ ~:::J:::J_ ~C/) · :>CDmOJCD CDCDm CDG>>CU -m .Ul a. _ snC.c (D I Co) m-"Z- crr_ P: -of- QQ ~ -CDO...... c.JO- WOCQ <-.:::J, I\JO_~::r W:::Jp. W:J. I (DQco!.:> a.::r-o ......CJ """ttJ- ::J(")ttJ. en "T1 c5 - W_ W_Q. -- C. A< A < . c _ .., 0 _. al !=J ~ .0- (DO(");:' a. p. A" . CD..,OCC I - -a (") 0 I / I I PAGE 2 OF 4 <:"-..,- - . I' .. 't .. le- i I I I I I I"~ I~- ~ I I " ... I -i r ......J. I I I f I / r , .... ,. " , ,~ ~ '\ . ~ 0 -a. ~ 0 -a. ... at CD ... 0'1 0 - - 3 3 CD -a. ~ C;) , ~ ..., 0 to ~ , ..... - m 9 I 0 0 z 0 0 - '0 0 t ~ b. 0 I 0 01 0 0 ocn......:>Q.~ ...,c:......-o - -. ..... 5' 0 ~ (i .. -0 (") , z~.., r C--a.o 0 > '.... _OO::::z.m<en 0 -- l" ,,8:T<g:~ ..;~-'- ....r" ~ " ,. r- ~- O:J :J a ~ . ~t ? <a;; <:-~ ""II-m co w ~. Zeo ..., , - ", ~ (Q iJ!1J en o <DO=O) ...... :>(1)0...... ..., :J , l' <QQl>>:t> -' CD - \ :J ow!:: 1 c: OOla. , - , CD . :J' J' - , - -- ^ , - : -, ~ , . .- ~ . ~ . - '~I a "~./ ~ ,. l..i PAGE 3 OF 4 s:/;;;~ -75 - I .. : <', ~ - ~ t_"' '", ,- ~ - ..... +e &.:r "- I E'AR:EI:. g .... -' - 1 " '"9 . A. ~7 ~~ .. t.:: - ~ 2AR::::r. 10 S' . - TO Z.4S ...... .-. SAT "\ :1 ,I -~ - - 0 I :. ...J G .- .1 + PAR::n. 1 I ... I I r- -:-T ~.~ L-~~ I - - e EAR:Zt 4 a.s.s H " ;' '". " -.. , '8 PAGE 4 OF 4' . , . , . '. ""'-. .IIIIif.L \'....... I ...., . , . '--' I i$R::EL 2 ~ e s.s "- U/ I PJUt:zt 6 e I ...~ 'I PAR:Er. s - - 1 ..... : - <9 . ...~- I !'"'o I I I S-7.;;l..:J - q (- - ~ .... I . .'-1" I ( I I I ~ . , I , I , ,. f t , I - I I~ I - :~ --- !; c!~ -l < a: u.. 1Z ~ClJe - rno~ ; ::l 0'" 00:" Z -.. -0 :: .. f-O: :x:C\l::, i C!] - -l . u.. ! rn "" We ". 2e .. Ll...to-.. d Ll... ~ u O~ c 0( .. C\I - j E ( : ::a ::a I : 3 , .. ~ ::a ::a ::a ~ J ~ : 3 : ::a ::a :II o i :- :: I .. o '" .. :- ~ jIIJjI ! ~ ; :; e : t.C" EXHIBITO 5722-95 TO ORDINANCE N " c .. J j, ..h !.!.l ,~!~ -44~i! ; !I,!~~ !!!! g~I:~! !. ~!6~:e .:~~ ~~i;~i ~: i~J~i~ l;a! ji8i~~ 1; '!Sl~. ."! I~,~.~ iii -:lj!:; 'SilS ..~~w'Q.' !iili:~ !i1t~'1 S-,!~i~~ ij~ !~ i;! ~ i~'" .2fWlolS/f" : f' ~ ~! ....~ to .:: ;,~'~.~ .~ ei I ~i~: ~: I ~2G~~~~ ~Z~!~ i$65ii~ i; i ..... :i ."''''(a ..~.... . .:Z .. __'" _ - ... -' Q<oDo- ~i .c ~.. ~ o i' .. .. .. ..;:; d ~.. u -:'.I; = a: ~ -. .. ; ... ... ... u c c .. :- -l < C3 .. a: :;0 ii ~~~ -\0::; O C\l: <0-- U u.. wrn () a .. -co -' u... II) ... u.. _ ~ o~: 0.. ;.. .... ..u -u , ..<C ~ 'Oo.a".~"aro.. .."" , . ~\, \C' " ..~ ... - <C:r- ~'" B 13. a: a~~ u f ....J i< sO' 20:;- ~W~ a~$. :E o (J - ... ... u c : :J'J - - a.. W c a: w I- en < ~ o w , en - > w c:: . - a: .0 w U < ..J a.. ::c:: c: <( 0.. ~'I I !II" ~ ~ ~~I I.j 0 (:) ~ "" ::. I <1)0 ~ .; ~ : ;:i..;: ~El ~.l ... .. ~ ~ ~ :; <=10: ~ ~ :'11 , -9 ~..................... I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I EXlllBIT B APPROVED REVISED MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN (MAP H) (pPDR/92.9S) 9 ~I : 'I I ". I ". II I I I I ::.- I I t :a ~ :a j ~ ! I ~ .c: : ~ : ::. ::r ::r J ~ :: f : s 3. ;- 0 = -. ~ ~ .... ~ . I .... :i - !e C!~ ~ < a: lL~ f- CI'J e - CI'J 0 S ~ ::l 0 .. 00:,: z ~.. -Og f-Ot :c C\/ .: S2 ~ u.. wCl) 00 .. -0 u..r-- d u.. - 1..1 o~ II: : C\l j C i II.!~ .. !'M ,~! 'uh= . !i,~g= i~!~ g:I:~i I. !~~a:e .=S~ ~~i:~i ~: I~~!-'i~ l;a~ jfif"~~ 1; It ..... .... Q f l:~ i'" ~ _c "'~ ~ w a'" l-" ~ii -d w c iliw~!~ leMi, E~!~!~r ii !g-g2.! "~g' '~"Ig. 03 i ;.i:l ~gleg li::i~~ ~. j ~fmh ~m= !gmg= !i -- ~g .c ~.. '>, CD 11.- o laG CJ! IIfmI "ftJ ;~ IJ ... - '<::&;- ~"'1Ol II.!;! '"< -... u - .. ... U II: '< .. lL WOO UO .. -co .. u... co ... IJ.. - li! o~: - ell.. ... ..... .... -u . .... ~ ~~ f ......J g< 35 20:;- ~W~ 1I:E! :E o (.) - . . c.. I W c a: w ..... en c:( ::s c w en - > w a: I - a: .c w c.J < ....J a.. ~ a: <C a.. ~. ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ t.i: ~ ~ > Ct) ~ Ct)I.Q 't .. ~ ~ ~Cl ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~a: ~ ~ .. :':1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I EXlDBIT C SUMMARy OF DEVEWPMENT Acnvrrv 67,819i:: SF of the approved 150,000 SF retail commercial eXIsts. 120,560:!:: SF of the approved 795,520 SF office space exists. lOO,OOO:!:: SF of the approved 200,000 SF mdustrial use exists. Development activity dunng the reportmg year consIsted of commercial construction on the ou tparcels frontmg SR -60. (pPDRl9WS) 18 I I I I I I I, I I I I I I I I I I I I EXHIBIT D CHANGES IN OWNERSHIP In early 1995, CLANT, Inc acquired ownership of the two (2) undeveloped outparcels fronting along SR-60. The graphic followmg this owner's lIst illustrates the current ownership of parcels withm the Park Place Development. To the best of our knowledge, no other changes of ownershIp of undeveloped parcels occurred dunng this reportlllg year. Park Place Owners :ti!l. Parcel I.D. No. Owner 1 17-29-16-85546-000-0010 Storz Ophthalmics, Inc. 21 Park Place Blvd. North Clearwater, FL 34619 2 17 -29-16-85546-000-0020 Storz Ophthalmlcs, Inc. 21 Park Place Blvd North Clearwater, FL 34619 3 17-29-16-85546-000-0030 Storz Ophthalmics, Inc. 21 Park Place Blvd. North Clearwater, FL 34619 4 17-29-16-00000-230-1300 Park Place Land, Ltd. c/o Clinton InternatIOnal Group, Inc 2121 Ponce de Leon Blvd Coral Gables, FL 33134 5 17 -29-16-00000-240-0600 Park Place Bldg, Ltd. c/o Clmton InternatIOnal Group, Ine 2121 Ponce de Leon Blvd. Coral Gables, FL 33134 6 17-29-16-0??oo-240-0400 Park Place land, Ltd. c/o ClInton International Group, Inc. 2121 Ponce de Leon Blvd. Coral Gables, FL 33134 7 17-29-16-0??oo-230-1100 Park Place Bldg., Ltd. c/o Clinton International Group, Inc. 2121 Ponce de Leon Blvd. Coral Gables, FL 33134 8 17-29-16-00000-230-0100 BUIldmg Operation Holding Co. 17-29-16-00000-230-0200 c/o PNC Realty Holdmg Corp. One PNC Plaza, 18th Floor Fifth Avenue & Wood Street Pittsburgh, PA 15222 (PPDRJ9Z.9S) 19 I CHANGES IN OWNERSHIP (CONTD) I I 9 17~29-16-59392-001-001O MRL #C-IIII Ltd. Suite X215 I 2800 Routh Street Dallas, TX 75201 I 10 17 -29-16-00000-230-1000 CLANT, Inc. P. O. Box 916464 Longwood. FL 32791 I 11 17-29~ 16-00000-240-0500 CLANT, Inc. P. O. Box 916464 I Longwood,FL 32791 Park Place Blvd. The City of Clearwater A I 112 S. Osceola Avenue Clearwater, FL 34616 I I I I I I I I I I I (PPO RI929S) 20 ,I ") I I I' I ,I I I I - - .-- I I' I I I I I , I I +8 IZ..:f "- r ~a - iC - :8 .I .... P.AK..cL 7 . -- r:=~=-r .. ~~- '2.Aa:::E:r.. 10 p. ~.. i 'j 9"-s ~ . Q] J z..~$ _ - -.. TO BAY' , - '\ - -~ .- .. I ~.~ e E'.!\PC:L 4. a.ss J. i .. - -8 - a > ..J GI + EAOC:EI.. 1 ~-=-r ~~~ ..t "-!....., :0 ~... ~ ~") \. .. ..~ ..... . .. . . . --..... F1UCEL 2 a. ..... e s..s .r..- e lUG ,... 2l\OCEt. S - : - 1 _.. , L . l I I \ -- e . "'R.l.._ I .-. . l ~ 1. ;. ~~ I.... I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I EXHIBIT D-l PARK PLACE BLVD. DEDICATION (pPD~ 10 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I AM...fIoI; ! J " I '" J I nl. fo"_,,, ,,,,.,,,,.,.. Ce raid J. Biondo. Esq. Hurei. Weld, Biondo & Moreno, P.A. _.... 2S s.. E. 2nd Avenue. Suite 900 Miami. FL 33131 ,....eeI. ......~Ul ,.J.... ...--......4'... ......ut.m I... "":_11 II. fll' ..,Ir,(1 AtOVI 'n1I!I U'oII roAl"IlOCfUlHC; OAf A 51""Ct.A.lQyt IHIIlfl!ll! fOA "tCoatwtC DATA 'Url, is tJDu it QJ:hrim lIJ,ecb. EXeclI/ed fhe / / ~ day of Sept embe r PARK Pl.ACE U\NO. LTD , a Florida limited partnerslllp, THE CITY OF CLEARWATER J99S , by jirSI pdrry. fa whose poSI offiCII addrus Is Jllcolld JIG"y ~...., oItt.. top..... 1_... ,.'. ".t ,.""" t.... "U.3. ,t"J "~Wt. tll'" tN'l"~ 14 11II4 -"'~"iIIII 111I. .t.. ....... ".~ t.,.........~...u M. ,.~...;II;. .. .....,.... Mcf tI.t 4.. .tlN." ..., Ut..... ., '11III' '.r....IIIlI.. ...-......... ~ ....... 1. Ill.... .... ,It""", ,DfLlru..rU,. 7hal /hlljinl ptJrty, for and //I eOlUldflra/lOn oflhe SU/JI of SlO. 00 , '" harrd paid by Ihe sll/d second parry. Ihe recelpl wherflof IJ htreby oc!:no\v{fldgtd, dou hllrflby 'fI"'ISfI re/flQ!ifl and qllll_ dill", unla Iht Jflcond parry fO"fI~tr. Illf Ihe nghl, I/I/t, IIIltrUI. dill'" and dfl/JIalld wh.ch Iht JIl/dftrSI parly hlU '" alld 10 Ihe fo/(ow"'g ducnbed /01, pita or pared of/alia, SUlla/t. IYJIIg and berng IIIlht COllntyof Pine lIas . Stale of Florida , 10"nt SEE EXllIBIT "A" ATTACIIED IIERETO. 'GJe ~br 1mb to ~I.h. The SOnlttogt/her IVilh off ond SlIlgl//Qr Ihe aJ/pllrleIlO~tS IhUtl/IIIQ bIt/a/lglllg or III O'Il)'wiu apprrlalllJll1 and 011 the Ulllle, nghl. m/t, Illltrut. !ttll. eql/ily and claIm IVhOIJoever of Ihe SOld firs, PtJl1y, tl/htr III low or fqll")' '0 Ihe only proper IIse. belltfit alld bthaof oltht SOld second parly forevtr. c3Jn )mfllnrlll ~lltuo!. Iht saldftrs, parI)' has signed and JttJltd Ihue prtJtllls Ihe doy Illld )'fIar finl abovt wrl/lt/\, PARJ( PLACE LAND. LTD,. a FloE'f.do limited paE'tnership By: PARK PLACE LAND, INC.. a Florida ~CO);POE' a t ion ~v.\...0-'-- C-L<...--__ Stewart Marcus, Pres~dent ".,..4N:IIIM CIO Clinton International GE'OUP, Inc:. 2121 Ponce de Leon Boulevard ''''o''Cd~l Gables. FL 3313~ S'I"d, ...1.d .,d dd, ~ ". pc".. of ~t:."'JL.( ../ ~___ --......, ,........(....Of.-J ~ ~/f/Vc AYdF ~ t'{~t.LL-fl-e-, /J..'.:'"q.'~\ .... ,..IMtI(...."'..~1 I ;d.~~e!l tC J,,'}( I 6::'r1o ._,~(. IOC._,""'I c.o.u.. "_'{JI..1 ".... lit... ....... ..... .,............. ,. ...C"~j.1I1111Q') '-I 0""', ,I.... ,-- "- COIlNTY OP I "'''hy Cifn.f, rL..t ... Ih.1 d.rt l;.r1ll,. fJW .. OIJ"ICC, du1r IU ud t. odmIOUl.. oalbo ..... '.h ..k.....le.......l.. I"lI , ""po.... ~ iN.... 10 m, '0 lb. 1M ,..~_ dlKrib-ld .e Ii." who u:tc:ulld .... fOIlI.!IUB, I..trunt." -11Io ad...'*liflr dllll... ftIf ".:1 u",".d 'h....... ....,.. o.'~ ........ '.b... (Ch.k... )0 .s.., PO"."C)) I...... po......II' k..... Sold ..."oo{,) ,,",y,dod Ih roll...... I". otld,,'.r~.II.. NO'AII. I...UllIfNtO..... dlrol A b Jt__ :N.J.,., ,........ " " II f111111it11.ilfetllt;.q.utwlt (ACKNOWLEDCI:.HI;NT ON Nf..)( r PACE) I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I STATE OF FLORIDA ) ). 89 COUNTY OF DADE , The foregoing lnstrument was acknowledged before me thlS '/ day of September, 1995 by .....:s-e...kt,.~ fv\.o",. u ~ as (0., ...,1- , of PARK PLACE LAND, INC , a Florlda corporat on, the sole general partner of PARK PLACE LAND, LTC , a Florida llmited partnershlp, on behalf of the partnershlp lie 19 per90nally known to me or has produced as identiflcatlon My Comm19sion eXplre9. e.- IC, ATE OF FLORIDA Ol\Ul\J 1J~u.ui; - 60 ~e No.: / '1/ fI il11\ DACEY UImIR.I..aonm ~ Hollq l'vIlO:, lIIll .. flonl.o lit -. ...... Sop!. II" lite ! N, ccn_ I , 1 I THIS IS tlQI. A SURVEY I ':t."J" < . ,~ i:J . -', . .. ~.'\. . r ~<.." N " :CT ') ~TCR;~ CfJ~Y-:}-!~: ;.,::C5, :.\fC r' _ / 'J A R..... :J' II' ...':.... "--><' .".."" ttJ""""""'L "'- :, it :Qgl P::5 :c-:; / " ,'JY'J , r I~_ . t)'" ~tr" .<f ,~... 1;4 c... ~ ,'w of' / 'r ,.) of' '7 lJ' 1../ (.'," .' I , , I I I o JO 60 P""""'_ SCALE. I = 60 120 I I ..("J I," , ' , r '~v ,(: IJ ", , r' "" ,~J ........... ........... ....... I , ,f"J' ',a I , 1 I I I .'tJlJ, CJ l"J A , . ' , (' f'''' I A ("' ,J .,. I I SEE SHEET 2 OF 2 FOR LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND CURVE .u.o llNt TABLES. PARK PLACE BOULEVARD PARCEL 2 I ll&.l JlAlL I r:60 ,IIlI..lIa. 1999-342-000414 8/7/95 lIIolD JVJ :lW.IlI t6LU.D. JVJ lA:IImIr: auwt K.JB IWlli( 1 her~by C Ir Illy I~<fl I~h 1'1/'11 dtlcrlplloft on<! I. tlci'l ,"uh I~I "'Inlmo... IIC~nlcal Ilanda'dl al Itl la.lh by I~. rlo.lda Boa,d al Prol.nlanal Lond Sutu,ars 10, Chapl.. 61GI1.6 Flo<ldo Admln"l,allu Cad. pll1luonl I. Sullon '172027. FIOIo4o SloM.. Shlc~ ond L19a1 Oll<.lpllon nal .olld ...... II l1<jnld ond ''''''<fllld .tlh Sunly.... I Sui CE'~ ..U'" .... LEO... "..""'"". ~ PRorESS~HAL LAND SURVEYOR I ~12 STATE OF rLORIDA Sh~or -1-- of ~ I ! ~KING ENCINEERS . PLAHNtRS . SURVEYORS ~ SCltHTISTS. LANQSCAp( ARCHITECTS I I I i , 17 29 S. 16 E ENGINEERING ASSOCIA rES, INC. I IUU u.l, _n no _TN CU~IJ.TU 1'1.00000I I-Ill '"11 ",' I" . '11. t .Jl 1-. un ".1 I I LBGAL DESCRiPTION: PARK PLACE nOULBVAlW . PARCEL 2 A tract of land lyiog within Section 17, Townsbip 29 Soutb, Range 16 East, PmeUas County, Florida and hemg more partlculllCly desenbed as follows: I BeGIN at the Southwest corner of Park Place Boulevard, accordwg 10 the plat of Storz Opbtbalzrucs, Inc., Park Place, as recorded in Plat Book 109, on pages 10 lhrougb 11 of the Pubhc Records of Pmellas County, Florida, thence along tbe southerly boundary Loes of saJd pial, the following three (3) courses; (1) thence 859"52'00"8, for 8000 feet, (2) thence S3tr08'OO"W, for 14111 feet to the pOlOt of curvature of a curve concave to the Northwest; (3) thence southweslerly along the arc of said curve, havmg a radIUS of 2000 00 feel, a central angle of 00"23'52~, an arc length of 1389 feet and a chord bearing S30"19'56"W, for 13 88 feet to the Southwest comer oC lot 2, accordmg to said pIal; thence conlUlUe southwesterl)' along tbe arc of saJd cuC'o'e, baviug a radiUS of 2000.00 feet, a centrallUlgle of 13040'47", no ate length of 477.51 Ceet and a chord bearing S3n2'16"W, Cor 47638 feet 10 the point of LDlersection Wlth a non-tangent Ime; thence N45047'20"W, for 8000 feet to the point or radIal Ultersection with a curve concave to the Northwest, thence northeasterly along the arc of saId curve, havmg a radius DE 192000 feel, a cenlralllllgle of 14"04'39", an arc length of 471.74 feet and a chord bearing N37"10'20~E, for 470.56 feet to the pOWl or tangency; thence N30"08'OO"'B, ror 141.11 reet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 1.14 acres, more or less. I I I I I I I I DIREC TlON 559'52 OO"E H4S'41'20-W OISTANCE 9000 9000' I CURVE I RAOIUS J lENGTH I TANGENT I CHORD I 8EARING I OELT A CI 2000 00 . 1389 69" 1366 S30'I9 56 W 00'Z3 !lZ CZ 2000 00' 47? Sf ZH ~o 41638 531'2216 W JJ'40 41M C1 1920.00 41114 21707 410.56 N37'IO'20 E 14 '04 39- I I I I \ I I SHEET 2 OF 2 I I AdrI.... ! .! ~ 1 1 .. ! J I "'....,"-...,..,.,..." Cerald J. Bionoo, Esq. Hurai, Wald, Biondo & .~reno, P.A. ~.~ 25 S.!. 2nd Avenue, Suite 900 Hiami, Florida 33131 '...... .........,. ",'... "..........1.... N.....(.I) I 0"....1.1 . .. 'f'l .ACI Alo.l ne~.IO."'OC.ISHCOA'A !'ACI AIOYl uaSlw. PQIUICQAOIHC OA'A I 'eIn,is Ql)uit QIInim J.fJee~, E.recuttd thf/ //'1'7(./ doyof September . /995 PARK PLACE BUILDING, i:1i>.7""a Florida limited partnership, fim porty. to TIlE CITY OF CLEAJlWATER whose post office addreJS I.S second pocty . by I l'W'-u_ ...4 ....~ .... It,_ .... "Nf'-.-4 ."... ,,". ...w. ,. ,... ,,"',,, le." ....."'.... I.' lil, ........ "I" ..,.......-... ... ....".. .. ~.., M4.. ........... M4 ...".. .. ...,.,...... ...,..., .. .....n I. W1--. .. '....-.J I .B tlnrlllc Uf, 17rat the first pony./or and In constdual/on of thulI", of J 10 . 00 . In hand pold by the sold second party. the rece'pt ..hereoflS hereby aclrnowledged. dOeJ hueby remISe. release. and quII- clal'" IInto tile second party forellu. aJ/ the nght. tllle. IntUeJt. claln' and J.:mand which the said first party /tas In and to the follollllng deJcnbed lot. puce or porcel of land. situate. lying and belllg In tht County of Pinellas . StOlt of Florida . to-WIt I SEE EXlIIBIT uAu ATTACIIED IIEItt."TO. I I 'ala ~&r Dub to ~lb, 17le sa",ttogelher IlIl1h all and slllgl/Iar the apprlTlenanCeJ thereunto belonging or In anJ'WIse ap~rtalnJng. and alltht eJtatt. nght. title. IntUeJt. /ten. eqll/ty and cia,,,, whotsol!llu of Ihe lord first party. ellher In law or equity. to the only proper IIse. benefit and behoof of the SaId sfICol/d party foreller ~11 ~ill1t811 }mJI,enof, the saldjirst porty has Signed and sealed these presents the day and year first obolle written. PARK PLACE BUILDING, LTD., a Florida limited partnership By: l'ARJC PLACE BUILDING, INC., a ~~~da co~poration "'''V '-0-...,..... '--'L.>J I I Stewart Marcus, Pres11p.nt "....4.._ c/o Clinton Internat,1onal Group, Illc. ,...o",,~UJ",PgAlle de been Balllc'.anl Coral Gables, FL 33134 I r;;J1 " ~~ l -/1..... . ...JI,_ '(."1\'1101'..., I W..a JI..... (... c....on...u.." C-"",-'l".." ....... N_ ,.... ,,- I w_,.._,...C_ """ ,.. Oftk. A.... _N_ I COUNTY OF 1 .."by C'""y ,... o. lhlt d.y. hololt _.'. ollie.. duly. ud 10 "'m.."r.. 0.... o.d I... ....o...da-.... ptf. y .pp....d I ...... to me I. b,... p.no__ 6..cr&lll... .. ..d ..0 t.,need .Ia. (Ort,OI., ...tlvm.... _. Ic'.owl. .....l.d I" u_ o.cl.. 011. .11...1 ....L (Q... OUt )0 Slid pcnoo(.) ",... ptnouUy ...... I,p. .1 lcIulIf,CltIo. I MO'..., .U."."............ d.... my..... 0." 01lie..1....1.... Coa.IJ u4 $1.0110.. do,....., .... dl,ol .\.0 19___ I N...., SIt..... .. It fI ....... MM., II...... I (ACKNOWLEDGEI'IENT ON NEXT PAGE) - I I STATS OF FLORIDA I as COUNTY OF DADS I The forego~ng ~nstrument was acknowledged before me ~' day of September, 1995 by 61(w...\ U""C:u <. __I1'..!o,d.....} , of PARK PLACS BUILDING, Florlda corporatlon, the sole general partner of PA BUILDING, LTD., a Florida lim~ted partnershlp, 0 beh partnership He 18 personally known to me r h a. 'd"n.'f'~' NOTARY P , STA Print na : DPc.~ CommJ.ssl.on No I F La IDA o/~)!'fi. - ~~rre I I I My Commission expJ.res. <Ii..' 'all DACEY YlImIIl.l. BonnE IloIIIy ~ SIll '" ~ ur-....,S..1I ,.... No e<:n6tIl I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I / / / I HIS IS tiQI. A SUAVEY N SiCR;: CP,LfiHA: ,'.,:1;.;:;. IN::., .:JAR1( ,:J:A~"E ~u a :091 !':;S :.';-:: /'..1 .'JcJ '. . f .:;_ I ''''''''''c /.) ,\~ . c: ~). ,....... ",," ~"", · '<" .',j" 'J' ,..r rJ '. 't.: 'J,' ,.~.J o " 30 ~ SCALE, r 2 30' ..~1' ,,- -r<" f: :::: p~rt 111- .::. ~. "" ;-. ~ .~<oT o oR 0'<:) .'l .~ .-?-:: (.) ...t) " . ',' 60 I ,.f.-i' 1':" ~'....J _l4J J ",f ~J rJ 't...... "'r 10... ,'/f ,.:;~ " A.... ", ,-... ..)." I)~ ,...... i~~- ,j ....f /)j .#,. .....J S64-32'56"E 24.65' . I~ ~. rf ~, f.) ro~ ~ .~J' ,~ ,) Sa O"'V)o, <o"'lf-e I' s,. ~ ~ 0<9, 'It>? ~:', \,. ," ....1 ':..,....... .....~... ,r, ~'vv . .' fl'r ~ ' / / / I .( ..1J ~ , CUflVE RAOIUS LENGTH TAHGENT CHORO BE ARlHG OELTA CI 2000 00 lJ 89 694 IJ 88 S30',9 $6"W 00'2J 52 C2 2000 00 471 lJ9 90 476 J9 537'2216'W 13"40 '11 (1 200000' 10 00' 00 1000 S44'211S'W 00"'7 If C'I 41000 18.59 191f 1857 541'4806'W 0!.i'l13r C$ 151000 5'168 27 J'I 54,68 "40'2!.i 46-E Ol"04 29 SEE SHEET 2 OF t FOR LEGAL OESCRlPtlOH PARK PLACE BOULEVARD PARCEL I lULL llAU I .30' 6/7/95 ./IlILIlII. 1999-342-000 414 ll8Ull J,VJ H.t.1I:lIl 17 w.wt J V J. I.llBIIIIE 29 S ualWl K.J.B &WIll( 16 E , ~"tby tlrllly lltol I", 1'901 c:!ue"pIlOl'l OM Ike leh mu" Ihe ",1ft!.....", foehn,,",1 IlaAc:lOfd. Of ,oJ loti" bJ Iho florIN Bear' 01 Prol.nlono' Lanc:! $prnJorl III Chapltr 61GI7.6 f'od~a Ac:!",Inh...ll~. Cad" p.......... 10 SIC hOI "72 027, fl"flcl" St"MII Sic I~h Oftc:! LI90l OllerlpllOft ...,1 y"Ud ""'... 1'9"od ond .lIIt>olttc:! with S.......JOI. 5.", '~ "".a'.... ~'GAL "',....,... , ~ PROfESS~NaL LAND SURVEYOR I ~72 S fA TE Of FLORIDA. Sheer I'll SKING ENGINEERING ASSOCIA TES, IHe ! ENGINEERS. PLANNERS' SURVEYORS · SC.IENTlSTS' LANDSCAPE ARCHITEcTS j . i i tulS U I _U I' IllIRTH ClUJ'1I'UU n_. J4fU rllll ", rOll, ,n. '"11 I" I1U ? I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I LBOAL DESCRIYIlON: PARK PLACB BOULEVARD. PARCEL 1 A tract of land lyiDg within Sectioo 11, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, PUle1las CoUDty, Florida aod beiog more particularly described as CoUaws: Commence at the Southeast comer oC Park Place Boulevard, accordtng to the plat of Storz Ophthalnucs, Inc., Park Place, as recorded in Plat Book 109, on pages 10 through 11 of the Public Records of PineUas County, Florida; t1lence along the westerly boundary I.lI1es of Lot 2 of said plat, lbe foUowwg two (2) courses; (1) lhence S30"08'OO"W, for 14111 feet to the pOUlt of curvature with a curve concave to the Northwest, (2) thence southwesterly along the arc of swd curve, haVlng a radius of 2000 00 feet, a ceDtral angle of 00"23'52-, an arc length of 13 89 feet and a chord beanog S30"19'56"W, for 1388 feet to lhe Southwest comer of said Lot 2; thence conlinue southwesterly along lhc arc of said curve, having a radius of 2000 00 fee I, a central angle of 13040'47", an arc length of 4 n S l feet and a chord beanng S37"22'16-W, for 476.38 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continue southwcsterly along the arc of swd curve, baVlllg a radius of 2000 00 feet, a central angle of 00"17' 11-, an arc length of 10.00 feet and a chord bearing 844"21' IS"W, for 10.00 feel to the pOUlt of reverse curvature of a curve concave to the Soutbeasl; thence southwesterly along the arc of wd curve, havmg a radiUS of 410.00 feet, a central angle of 05"23'310, an arc length of 38.58 feet and a chord bearing S41048'06"W, for 38.57 feet; thence N53"28'20-W, for 10433 feet; thence S64"32'56-E, for 24.65 feet to lhe poiot of Intersection with a ooo-tangent curve concave to the Norlhwcst; thence northeasterly along the are of saul curve With a radial bearing N48"31 '59"W, and baVlOg a radius of 1510 00 feet, a central angle of 02"04'29", an arc lengtb of 54.68 Ceet and a chord bearing N40"25'46-E, for 54.68 feet to the p01l1t of intersection with a non-tangent line; tbence S45~47'20.Il, for 82.01 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 4,404 square feet, mOre or less. .. SHEET 2 OF2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I EXHIBIT F PERMIT INFORMATION Ust of Development Approvals and Permits [For Reporting Year Ending 9/1/95] Note: This List of Permits and Approvals Pertains to the Outparcel Development. ADDroval /Permit A2eney Submittal Dates ActIon PrelJmmary Site Plan City of Clearwater 06/2/94 Approved 8/30/94 Vanance Apphcatlon City of Clearwater 08/30/94 Demed (Landscape Buffer) NotIced General SWFWMD 00/06/94 Approved 10/03/94 ConstructIon Permit Dramage ConnectIon Permit FDOT 00/06/94 Approved 11/04/94 Certtfied Fmal Site Plan City of Clearwater 10/26/94 Latest Approved 08/09/95 Dredge & Fill ACOE 10/28/94 Approved 11/16/94 ConstructIon Plans City of Clearwater 10/31/94 Approved Water Permit (Fire ProtectIon) City of Clearwater 11/03/94 Approved 11/09/94 Water Permit (Fue Protection) Pmellas Co Health Dept 11/10/94 Approved 11/18/94 Wastewater Permit FDEP 11/10/94 Approved 12/13/94 Utlllty Permit FDOT l2/22/94 Approved (Water Taps m RjW) Prelimmary Plat City of Clearwater 03/00/95 Approved 05/04/95 Special Use Permit FDOT (13/23/95 Approved 6/20/95 (SjW Construction in R/W) NOI for Stormwater DIScharge USEPA 04/(13/95 Approved Fmal Plat City of Clearwater 05/17/95 Recorded 09/06/95 Water Certification of Completion Pinellas Co. Health Dept. f1)/(J7/95 Approved 09/07/95 Wastewater CertificatIOn FDEP CY:J/07/95 Approved 12/02/95 of Completion Construction Certificanon SWFWMD 10/30/95 Approved 11/29/95 (PPDRl'J2.95) 21 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I EXIllBIT G COMPLIANCE WfTI:I DEVELOPMENT ORDER CONDmONS AND ADA COMMITMENTS All conditions of approval and Developer's commitments, as con tamed In the Park Place Development Order (amended 12/19/91) and the ADA, are still In effect and bemg met. A bnef review and statement of compliance WIth the COndItIons outlmed are as follows: CONDmONS AND COMMITMENTS COMPliANCE SECfION 4. A PrelImmary and Flllal Site Plans submit- ted for each phase and consistent with the DRI "Conceptual Plan". AA. Prior to issuance of any permit utilizing the conversation factors, DCA and TBRPC will be notified. B All development shall be consIstent WIth applicable land development codes. BB 1. PortIon of Park Place Blvd. dedi. cated to the City of Clearwater. BE. 2 Portion of Park Place Blvd. con- structed pnor to C.O 's for Parcels 4 or 6, or '12/31/98. C MaxImum floor area of 1,145,520 SF (795,520 SF offIce use - 150,000 SF retail . 200,000 SF mdustnal) subject to con- verSIOn factor. Cc. Mass transit requirements. D. Acquire land for ingress/egress west of the project. E. Fundmg commitments for transportation Improvements prior to the fIrst Final Site Plan approval after 1/19/95. F. - Deleted Via Ordinance No. 5722-95 - (1'I'DR192.9S) All development actiVity must receIve the appropnate CIty approval conSIstent WIth the "Amended Conceptual Plan", ExhibIt C, approved VIa Ordinance No. 5722-95. No action reqUIred dunng thiS reporting year All development actIvity IS reviewed and approved by the City of Clearwater at tIme of plan approval. Developer has comphed - see ExhibIt D-1 No actIOn reqUIred dunng reportmg year No actIOn required during reporting year. Developer has complIed and WIll continue to do so. Access preViously acqUIred. All Developer COffirmtments have been met. 22 I CONDmONS AND COMMITMENTS I G. Funding commitments for transportation Improvements. I H Requinng certain City cooperatIOn. I - Deleted VIa OrdInance No. 5142-91 - I J. ResponsibilIty for all construction and I improvements made on-site and mainte- nance thereof. I K. Designated aquatic lands shall remain undIsturbed, excepting as approved for use consistent WIth City and retention I polICIes. L Measures to control water quality and I eroSIOn. M. Monitonng of on-site water quality in the 'I project drainage system. I N Paved surfaces cleaned penodIcally as part of water qualIty maintenance. I O. DraInage Plans reqUIred at time of FInal SIte Plan approval I I P Final Drainage Plans to meet FGFWFC recommendations. I Q BIcycle and pedestrian paths required. I I R Soli limitations corrected and mitigated, additional solis testing as required. I I I (PPDRi9295) 23 COMPUANCE Developer has paid or commItted to fund. No action reqmred dUrIng reportIng penod Developer has contInued to assure on-going maintenance. No development aCtiVIty has occurred affectmg the aquatic lands. Developer has continued to assure on-going safe dIsposal of run-off. SWFWMD has issued permits for all land development actiVIty. These permits contam water qualIty monitoring proviSIOns where appropnate. Paved surfaces have contInued to be cleaned as needed All development activity WhICh occurred dunng the prior reporting year complIed wlth the stated reqUIrement as a COndltIOn of plan approval issued by the City of Clearwater All development activity whIch occurred dUrIng the pnor reporting year compIled with the stated reqmrement as a condltIon of plan approval Issued by the City of Clearwater All development aCtiVIty which occurred during the prior reporting year complied with the stated reqmrement as a condition of plan approval issued by the City of Clearwater. All development activity which occurred dunng the pnor reporting year complIed with the stated requirement as a condition of plan approval issued by the City of Clearwater. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 'I CONDmONS AND COMMITMENTS S. Construction phased to keep any trees with active osprey nests in place through nesting season. T Capture-release program established and approved by FGFWFC for certain wildlife species. U. Any historic or archaeological resources discovered to be reported to appropriate state agency. V. Site Plans include proVISiOns for preservatlOn and transplanting of tree clusters and individual trees, where possIble. W. Encouragement of energy conservation measures X. Maintenance of on-sIte wells. Y. City reqUIrement to provide certain services (a CIty comnntment, N/A). Z. Contribution of proportIOnate share of constructIOn costs for certain traffic improvements. (PPDRI92.9S) COMPliANCE All development activity which occurred during the prior reporting year complied with the stated reqmrement as a conditIon of plan approval issued by the City of Clearwater. A capture-release project approved by FGFWFC was completed on December 6, 1991. All development actIvity whIch occurred during the prior reporting year complIed with the stated requirement as a condition of plan approval issued by the City of Clearwater. All development activity which occurred during the prior reporting year complied with the stated reqmrement as a COndItiOn of plan approval issued by the City of Clearwater. All development activity which occurred dUrIng the prior reporting year complied with the stated requirement as a condition of plan approval issued by the City of Clearwater No action required during the reporting period The City and/or County WIll proVIde services as required. Developer has paid its proportionate share of transportation Improvements in accordance WIth applicable revised Development Order conditions. 24