The URL can be used to link to this page

FL02-02-04 (3) ( , \ \ \ FL 02-02-04 3006 Gulf to Bay Blvd Nguyen, Phuoc Thanh -,;)I~L'4'-<,"". (;1~~~l"1 OF l/tf~~ ..y.^~. t!!,....--~lb?~~ {1.y'll..~lj ~ "" !!. ~"'.....' I = '" ~'{~~~\\ f/;}' I '\ "'I ~ "'~t --=- ~~ ..~~ ~~- ~" "'"'~" ., -'\~~ -----=-- (;/;j ~~~~~~~.).r ~~-z.;.,tj1E'RMjY~ -tr-<T_$lDJlI ~- CITY OF CLEARWATER PlANNING DEPARTMENT POST OffICE Bax 4748, CLEARWATER, FWRJDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICF.S BUILDING, 100 S6urn MYRnE AVElWE, CLEARWATER, FWRlDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727:) 562-4567 FAX ()27) 562-4576 loNG R".NGE PUNNING DCVELOPMENT REVIEW Apnl 26-, 2002 Mr Patnck T MagUIre, EsqUIre 1253 Park Street Clearwater, FL 33756 ~r":.~- RE Develop_ment Order regardmg Case FL 02~02-04 - 3006 Gulf to Bay Boulevard ~ ,I, Dear Mr MaguIre ThIS letter constItutes a Development Order pursuant to SectlOn 4-206D 6 of the Commumty Development Code On Apnl 16, 2002, the Commumty Development Board revIewed your applIcatIOn to reduce the requJ-red number ofparkmg spaces from 15 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area (32 -spaces) to 844 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area (18 spaces), reduce the front (south) setback from 25 feet to 3 6 feet to bUlldmg (exIstmg) and 12 feet to pavement (existing), reduce the SIde (west) setback from 10 feet to three Teet to pavement (exIstmg), reduce the slde (east) setback from 10 feet to zero feet to a dumpster enclosure (eXIsting) and five feet to pavement (exlstmg), reduce the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to 1 5 feet to pavement (exlstmg) and to permIt dIrect access to a major artenal road (Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard), as a ComprehensIve Infill Redevelopment ProJect} under the provISions of SectIOn 2- 704 wIth a ComprehensIve Landscape Program under the provIsIOns of Sectton 3-1202 The proposal IS for a restaurant wIthm an eXisting one-story, 2,132 square-foot masonry block bmldmg, with access onto Gulf tQ Bay Boulevard Based on the applIcatIOn and the staff recommendatIoQ, the Commumty Development Board APPROVED the applIcatIon wIth the followmg bases and condItlOns Bases for Approval 1 The proposal complies wIth the FleXible Development cntena as a ComprehensIve Infill Redevelopment Project per SectIOn 2-704 B 2 The proposal complies wIth the FleXIble Development cntena as a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provIsIons of SectIOn 3~ 1202 G 3 The proposal IS III complIance wIth other standards m the Code Illcludmg the General ApplIcability Cntena per SectIOn 3-913 4 The development IS compatIble WIth the surrounding area and WIll enh<U1ce other redevelopment efforts BRIAN J AUNGSl MAYOR COMMISSIONLR ED HART, VICE /I.'LWOR COMMISSIONER WHI I MEV GRAY, COMMISSIONER Ho'IT HAMILTON, COMMISSION~R * BIUjONSON, COL\t~lISSI0NER "EQUAL EMPI DYMENT AND AFFIRJvlA1IVE ACTION EMPLOYER" Apnl 26, 2002 Magmre - Page 2 Conditions of Approval 1 That a busmess plan outlnimg the operatIOn of the. proposed restaurant user with the maXImum number of employees on the largest ShIft, the hours of operatIOn, delIvery hours, parkmg demand, etc be submitted to ~the Plannmg. Department and be approved, pnor to Issuance of any permits or hcenses, 2 That any change m the type of restaurant be evalu'!-ted for comphmentary operatIOnal charactenstIc and parkmg demand, and may reqUIre approval by the Commul1lty Development Board, 3 That the bmldmg appearance be ImplOved wIth the use of wmdows, pamt and awmngs, acceptable to the Plaruung Department, 4 That any upgrade to a dumpster larger than two yards WIll reqUIre a new pad and enclosure, and any upgrade to the dumpster IS tQ be done wIthout removmg any parkmg spaces, and 5 That all sIte and extenor bmldmg Improvements be made to the satIsfactIOn of staff, pnor to the Issuance of any licenses or CertIficate of Occupancy Pursuant to SectIOn 4-407, an applIcation for a bUlldmg permit shall be made wIthm one year of FlexIQle Development approval (Apnl 16, 2003) All reqUIred certIficates of occupancy shall be obtamed wlthm one year of the date of Issuance of the bUIldmg permIt TIme Hames do not change With succeSSIVe owners The Commumty Development Board may grant an extenSIOn of tIme for a penod not to exceed one year,and only wIthm the ongmal penod ofvahdIty Please be aware that the Issuance oftlus Development Order does not relIeve you of the necessity to obtam any bUIldmg peIIDlts or pay any Impact fees th(j,t mg.y be reqUired In order to faCIlItate the Issuance of any p"ermlt or lIcense affected by thIS approval, please bnng a copy of thIS letter WIth you when applymg for any permIts or hcenses that reqUIre thiS pnor'development approval In additIon, please be aware that all appeal of a Level Two approval (FleX'Ible Development) may be mltIated by a property owner abuttmg the property WhICh is the subject afthe approval wIthm l4 days of the date of the CDB deCISIon The fiJmg of an applicatIOn/notIce of appeal shall stay the effect of the deCision pendmg the final detennmatIon of the case The appeal penad for your case Will expire on Apnl 30, 2062 If you havc any questIons, please do not heSItate to call Wayne M Wells, AICP, Semor Planner, at 727-562-4504 CynthIa H Tarapam, AICP Plannmg DIrector Cc Mr Phuoc Than.h Nguyen, property owner S \Planllmg Deparlmenl\C D B\Flex\f/lIl(l('llve or Fill/shed AppllcallOllIlGul/lo Bay 3006 TJllwh reSIOllranl- Approveri\Gulf 10 Bay 3006 De velopmb/( 0, dpr doc Date April 3, 2002 __~- --\ :S-~-~'''Y\ -~~f\ i.r\il I..t. 1"'1 \l ~~I;1.--r;~ \ ~ u V: _,:S~. \ \ ~1 \ n \ (~~ .., ..-'-~-~ . '\ \ 11 \ \ \ \ ..':;'"~L.-~ - ~~~ j ,\ \ \ h t..l r n2 I l', '.\ \\ \\ \\ APR 65 '2.0u \,~ < \IJ l:\ __ ,~ ~ .. ~~ y _...~_"""'" .. I \ Pl \~- \ ~""'~. .. To: CIty of Clearwater Commuruty Development Board From Thomas & BarbaI:.a Maas 3004 Carohna Ave Clearwater, FI. 33759 L~ Ref Pubhc Heanng April 16, 2002 Item #2 (enclosed) This is to notifY the Communrty Development Board of our objection to the proposed reduction of parking spaces for the Nguyen's RestJLurant. Overflow parkIng :from the. Wilder Center IS already creating a burden on the homes :fronting Carolina Ave. Grantmg tIns request to allow another busmess to have inadequate parkmg WIll only increase the parking problem in tins area. If the Board grants tins request for the Nguyen's it would be our reqiiest to create a No Parking Zone on Carolina Ave Thank you for your attention to this matter , > .... , o,PI>\ t i City Council ~'1~ earwa er ,: v~J ~_ __",,,,,"~il~nda ~.!?,.,!.!::,!:-~~~.~orandu"!=_=- _~_~.o _ TracklnQ Number 1,231 Actual Date 04/07/2005 Sublect / Recammendatlon Approve a settlement In the case of P Thanh Nguyen & T Klm-Truc Nguyen v CIty of Clearwater In the amount of $)0,000 Summary , Plaintiffs owned property at 3006 Gulf-to-Bay Blvd that had been leased as-an adult nightclub The tenants vacated, and the subsequent tenants were denied an occupational license for use as an adult nightclub because It was a non-canfarmlng use Plantlffs said the property In 2002 for $415,000,whICh they claim IS under market value because there were no other viable economic uses far the property Property was again sold In October 2003 for $657,500 Plantlffs filed a SUit clal ml ng damages under 42 US 91983 for depnvlng plaintiffs of the economically viable use of their real property Onglnatlnq CIty Attorney Section Consent Agenda Cateqorv Other Public Heannq No Financial Information: ~ Other Bid Required? No Bid ExceptIons Impractical to Bid In Current Year Budqef? Yes Budqet Adlustment No Current Year Cost $lO,OOO 00 Annual Operatlnq Cost $000 -- -r-'._ ~ /'; Cl1'" I ~~~, ~ --- --..,.--~~~~ For Fiscal Year City Council Agenda Cover Memorandum ~~~~=wn '*~ ==<<<;~%<x:n<'i'>i<'i....~ ~ -;;.. .....;<<-....::'$!x<::;:$!:>:::'':!>.>>>l>>>~>>>W"_ ~'*';::: 10/01/2004 to 09/30/2005 Total Cost $10,000 00 ApproPriation Code( s) 0590-07000-545900-519-000 RevIew Approval Pam Akin Cvndle Goudeau Tina WlIson Amount Comments $10,000 00 03-24-2005 10 47 21 03-28-2005 08 39 17 03-24-2005 14 35 55 r' T": Cr~' 7~ ?"""'~~ LDS .5 - ,;L .s ~t::J r UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION P. THANH NGUYEN and T. KIM-TRUC NGUYEN, his wife, Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 8:03-cv-2485-T-JSM-MSS CITY OF CLEARWATER, a Florida municipal corporation, Defendant. I CONTINGENT SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT The undersigned counsel for the Clty of Clearwater wlll recommend to the Clty Councll approval of thlS agreement at the next meetlng at WhlCh the matter may approprlately and lawfully be !Drought Contlng~nt upon Clty Councll approval, the partles agree 1 The above-captioned case sRal1 be dlsmlssed wlth prejudice, each party to bear hlS, her and lts own costs and attorneys' fees the medlatlon fee 2_ Defendant CIty of Clearwater shall pay to the Trust Each slde agrees to pay equally lts shar~ of Account of Thomas C. Llttle, counsel for Plalntlffs P Thanh Nguyen and T Klm-Truc Nguyen the total amount of $10,000 00 Pla1ntlffs will execute an approprlate release ln a form reasonaBly satlsfactory to the partIes. Done March 22, 2005 ln Tampa, Florlda EG~;liq;1Se Florlda Bar No 237851 Medlator Peter J GrillI, P A 3001 West Azeele Street Tampa, Florlda 33609 813 874 1002 Fax 813 874 1131 -j il-:~(;{/)?r_ (.1a--?U,,/- Plalrtlff" P. Thanh Nguyen ;'\,..., -t--I ~ .-L :tJ I . ~-- /' ~,7lt,ulj{q^--- Jet K 1/1/'-.) ,f(hJ L" Plamt;t;JT-! K~m-Truc NgU~ /' (j ~!~~ Counsel for Pla1ntlffs N~uyen v. City TIMELlNE 2/27/87 Plaintiffs Mr and Mrs Nguyen acquire property for purchase pnce of $130,000 00 Property IS inItIally operated as Golden Buddha Restaurant 8/1/89 Plaintiffs lease to J B M 11190 JBM sublease to WGW NIghtclub use IS active dunng thiS tIme frame but use IS abandoned pnor to 2/00 according to City 3/99 City adopts new development code containing stncter requirements for parking, landscaping I?'qr: 2/00 Plaintiffs lease to Bug n Me, [nc contingent upon obtaining City "jlltD~/ 'lf1"qro oCGupatlonalllcense ~loD W.t> Early 2000 City denies occupational license and Site Plan to Bug n Me, lnc State beverage documents indicate lIquor license applied for but not obtained 11/00 PIa Intlffs fIle SUit In state cou rt, seek injunction req uiring City to Issue licenses Case sent to arbitration, arbitrator rules In City's favor 12/00-3/01 Plaintiffs apply for Flexlple Development approval for nightclub use, denied by City ~.?Jtt()' {)KJfJ tlUJ71lf'h 4/02 City approves FleXible Development application for use as restaurant, Issues Development Order allowmg use 5102 Plaintiffs sell property to Mr and Mrs LeWIS for purchase pnce of $415, 000 00 10103 Lewlses sell property to Crum PropertIes for purchase price of $657,500 00 DEFENDANT'S CASE SUMMARY N~uven v. City of Clearwater, Case No. 8.03-CV-2485-T-30MSS Plamtlffs purchased the property located at 3006 Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard m the Crty of C lea rwater In 1988 for amu nd $180,000 00 They operated a restaurant on the premises for years, and the property was later used by their tenants as a nrghtclub There was some debate as to whether that use fell within the City's Adult Use OrdInance, with apparently an ultrmate determination that It did not There was then a hIatus In the actual occupancy for nightclub use, including a gap rn Ilcensmg and apparently utilities Plaintiffs entered Into a lease In early 2000 With Bug-n.Me, Inc whose princIpal IS Michael Caruso, contmgent upon the corporatIOn obtaining a City occupatJonalllcense (OCl) for nightclub use Mr Caruso, on behalf of the corporation, applied In February 2000 for an OCL and also for srte plan approvC11~ Involving zonmg l)se as a nightclub The GCL and zoning permIssIon were dented, based upon abandonment of the use, as well as adoptIOn In 1999 of a new CommunIty Development Code and failure of the application to meet ItS proVISions Neither the applicant nor Plaintiffs appealed these denials Plarntlffs brought SUit In CIrcUIt Court In 2000 seeking a mandatory Injunction ordenng approval of the nightclub use They did not seek damages rn state court for a taking The case was referred to voluntary arbitration, the arbitrator's award, made final by the CirCUit Court, was In favor of the City Plaintiffs In April 2002 applied for and obtarned licenses and zonmg permIssion for restaurant use of the property In thiS application process they used dlfferentt representatives and agreed to comply With Code proVISions regardmg parkmg and landscaping They sold the property In May 2002 for $415,000 00 Plamtlffs have brought thiS action seekmg damages for alleged vrolatlon (])f 42 use ~ 1983 and the takmgs clause of the U S Constitution The City has pleaded a number of defenses It has filed a Motion for Summary Judgment on the grounds of standing, ripeness, failure to exhaust admrnlstratlve remedIes, lack of substantive due process claIm, and res rudlcata The City believes there IS a good posslblll'y that the Court may grant summary Judgment on one or more of these bases In the event that the Motion IS not granteq, the CIty believes thaft It Will be able to prove at trial that ItS denial of the requested OeL and zoning permission was correct based upon abandonment and application of the Communtty Development Code The City also beheves that It Will pe able to show that the fair market value of the property as of the date Plaintiffs sold It was actually less than the sales price, and that therefore Plaintiffs have expenenced no monetary damages as a result of the City's actions Tarapani, Cyndi From. Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Hollander, Gwen Wednesday, March 09, 200511 06 AM TarapanJ, Cyndl Haines, Angel, Dougall-SIdes, Leslie RE Nguyen v City Cyndl, the mediatIOn IS on LeslIe's calander from 9 00 a m - 5 00 P m at Mr Gnth's office, 3001 West Azeele 8t , Tampa 33609 I'm not sure what time and how long you will need to be there - Leslre will have that mformatlon -----anginal Message--- From: Tarapam, Cyndl Sent: Wednesday, March 09,2005934 AM To: Hollander, Gwen Ce;. Hames, Angel Subject. RE Nguyen v City Gwen-I also need Information about when the mediation starts, where It IS, length of time It will take, etc I have the day blocked off but need to know more Information I asked LeslIe these questions last week but Ilmaglne she hasn't been able to respond yet But I really need to know-I have other calendar oblIgations that I need to either ask someone else to do or move Please let me know at your earliest convenience Thanks Angel-please respond re the requested meeting thanks Cyndt Tarapam Plannmg Dll'ector (727) 562-4547 cyndt tarapam@mvclearwater com -----Onglnal Message--- from. Hollander, Gwen Sent. Wednesday, March 09, 2005 927 AM To: Akin, Pam, Brumback, Garry, Tarapanl, CyndJ Cc: DeWItt, Gina, Phillips, Sue, Haines, Angel SubJec:t- Nguyen v City Leslie would like to meet With you to diSCUSS mediation/settlement In the Nguyen v City case The meetmg Will be m Legal's conference room and should only take 30 mmutes to an hour 3/16/05 from 9 . 1 0 am and 1 - 3 pm, 3/17/05 and 3/16/05 all day IS available The mediation IS scheduled for 3/22/05 Please let me know wtl rch date and time IS convement for you Thank you Gwen Hollander Legal Department City of Clearwater 727 -562-4013 !'l.. . .. . r . d CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY Phone Number (727) 562-4010 Fax Number (727) 562-4021 FAX TRANSMllTAl MEMORANDUM To: Cyndl Tarapanl, Planning Director From: Leslie K Dougall-Sides, Asst City Allomey Fax: 4865 P3!Je'S: 9 Re: P Thanh Nguyen v Clt)' Date: 113012004 803-CV-2485-T-30MSS o Urgent o Please Comment 0 Please Reply o Please Recycle X Far Review o Comments: Attached for your information IS a copy at the Surnmons and Venfied Complaint for the above-referenced case Confidentiality Notice The Information contamed in thiS facsImile message IS privileged and confidential, mtended for the use of the addressee above If you are nerther the tntended recipIent nor the employee or agent responsIble for dehvsnng thiS message to the mtended reCIpient you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copymg, dlstrlbutlon or the taking of action In reliance on the contents of thiS telecopled information IS strictly prohIbited If you have received thIS telecopy In error, please notify counsel above lmmethately by telephone to arranQe for return of the anginal documents to the counsel named above, lZ0to29SL,2L. F:;au",o~~1:l P.~lJ eS2:01 toO DE uer . , l(l ....AO ..140 (Rev 11)193) ::I'''''''no,,< I" " CIvil AC'IOI' ~ UNITED STATES DrSTRlCT COURT l-hd<11e Dlstncl of Flanna P Thanh :-gguyen and T. Klm-Trltc Ng~yen, hlS wife SU'VfMONS TN A C1VIL CASE v Clty of Clearwater, a F1or~da munlclpal corpoTaLlon CA S Sf ;) t-iJ (~!/",.p/J:_)-1-3(),i'J1S5 TO lNarnc u"iJ o'j.Jrcs5 of Defer,O~l1l) ) 17<- _ ,I /:J./ ~. ( (::::3 Clty of Clear~ater c/o Brlan Aungst, Sr , Mayor Offlce of the Mayor Clearwater City Hall, 3rd R1Dor 112 S O&ceola Ave. CleElD"atcr, Fl 33756 YOU ARE HEREBy SUMMONED and required to serv:c upon PLA1NTfFF'S ATTORNEY (n"\~,~ Mil 1rl,l"..<) lhomas C LIttle, Esquire 2123 N.E. Coa~hma~ Read, S~lte A Cleanvater, FL 33765 a n answer to ,he complam I ~yh leh IS herewltll sel ved upon you wllh,n ttven tv (:In) dnys after servlGe of IhlS ~ummons upon you, eXc!llslve Df ttle uai of se-V1Ct" If you tall [0 do SD, Judgment by default wtll be taken agamst you fOl the re bef dem a ndecl rn the ccmplamt YOll must al <;0 file) Ollr an,WeI WI tb tbe Clerk of th,g Cou rt ,.... 1th 1 n a fe<'1S:n'ablc pen od of t t me <lItel service ,. I' . , ' (') ( \ (8,) Drpl:J'rY C!...CR I{ fi , ./ DATE C1..El<.1( ) 2'd t20to29SL2L ~au..JO-:L~l::I ~..1:J eB2:Di toO OE U~r , . ~ ~~ -~ -~ ---- -- THE LINITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRiCT OF FLORIDA TA~..\PA DIVISION jJ THANrJ NGUYEN cme r KIM-TRue NGUYEN, hl~ wife. PloJriMfs. vs Case r'-w C.1T'l' OF CLE,t,RWA fER, .:: Flo"lda 1',lurllclpal corpora lion, Deferdant / VERIFIED COMPLAINT Plolnjlffs P THANH NGUYEN and T KiM-1RUC ~~GUYEN, his wife, sue t"1e Defendan; the CITY OF CLEARWATER, ana o1Jege as follows, GENERAL ALLEGATIONS PIOhl flffs me reslden Is of ;JI n ellm Coun Iy, Florld::J 2 Defendant IS a Flor:da rnunlclpal corporak:m 3 Plolnllifs are the ov'vne:s of reol property In Plnellos- County, Florldo, more particularly descrtbed os 3006 Gulf to Bay Boulevard, Clearwater Florida (hel-eln "the real ~lopert)1" 4 Pbnhrfs acqulreo SC:0 reul prope~ty by purchase of a fee slmpie Inieresr or or about December '9, 1988 E-d [=20t>2991.21. ~au.JO':l.':l.l:J i=:;~T::J eB2=0[ vO DE' uer 5 Dunng the Plolntiffs' ownership of said real property, Plolntlffs hod leased the suoJecJ real property to vonous teilc'lnts, which had beer ono' 'dine I,censes fOI 1helr respective businesses located at the SUbjeCT real property COUNT I 6 This IS a cause of action for damages Wl exces~ of $75,00000 7 PIOltlnffs recllege paragraphs 2 through 6 heretnabove ar.Q reincorporate Them here'n 8 On Aug us: 1, 1989, Plo In1iffs leased the SU8J8C t reo I property to J [1M ::ntertolnrrlent of Countryside, Ine , which used the prerYliS8S icr a "Dance Club- Restau'ant" 9, JBM Entertol'lment of CountrysIde, Inc held on occupational :Ic'=.nse <or "nightclub" use cmd used the subject real properry os c nightclub with a 2-COP Beer und Wine License #"062-0..:1460 10 J BM En te,; Qlnn! ent of Cou ntrysld e, I ne tro rsferred II s I nteres j an d IIq-.lor license to WGW Emerroinmeni, Ine on or cbout November of 1990 11 WGW Entertolnmen~, Inc com,:Jieted the terrns ot Its lease and \i cc.oted Ire su bject real property I )1 _ "") .,.-!.... \0\\.1 i . 12 Pia In tl ;f~, upon discovery I hot WG W En I erIo In men t, I nc was not reneWI<ig lis lease, placed a "ror I~ent" sign on the prem'ses and began to show jhe property for rent as 0 nightclub 2 ",'d 120tr29SL2L RaU.JD1-1-l;;I ~'l1:) ~82.01 ~o O~ U~r 13 Subsequen r 10 that tirne, Plolnr:ffs hove shown The subject real property TO severol prospec;lve tenants, bui those len::mT; were bid by ~ '\ '"' -........--- \..'l.-"J.' ~ og en rsl employees of th e City of Cle,arwater rho t the sub]ec t reol ploperty 15 not \ ,"\ , aVailable for use os a nlgrr7club or restauront X 14 Defendant knew or should have known that an occupoTloncl IJcense for a n:ghlc1ub was ~he only designation Issued ~or the subject rt.:'al property since !990, and the use of the subject leal properly by Plolnhft's prior tenant was continuous r- 15 Defendant has applleo Its land Development Code, whlc~ was y ef1ectlve January I' 2000, and was enccted subsequent to the established use of the reElI propedy, toP IOlntlff' s subject real property <;0 as to prevent Plain tiff's use of the subject reol propel1y for c:ny VIable economIc use 16 Defelldolir's application of Irs Land 8evelopmenr Code \0 PIOJnTlff's subject real propelty ::::na denial of February 4, 2000 occupational license 10 oreven t lis use os a nightclub O( restaurant, IS orbl trarf capnCIOUS, and wltnoiJt rEClsonable oasIs 17 As II direct result of the Defendar,t's wrongful oppll('"()tlon of the Land Developme'lt Code to Plaintiffs' subject real properly, Defenoant has Violated PlolnTlffs' CIVI] righTS and has caused damage to Plaintiffs under 42 ,... 1l,S C Section 1983 by depriVing PlatntlTfs of the economically VIable use of thell real ploperly 3 S.d haU.JO-:l.~l:J F;~t:) I20y29SL21. eS2:01 yO DE uer I 18 Plolnilffs have retained the uncerslgned law firm and a;Jree:i to pay reasonable cttarney's fee3 which should be oworaed under 42 U S C SecTion 1988 WHEREFORE, Plolntlf~s delT\cmd judgment against Defer,dcnt for dornose:;, COSTS of this octlor, reasonable cttorney's fees. and for such oiher ond 7\Jr1l1er relief as jhe Court deems appronnate COUNT II 19 This I~ a couse of ac tl on for dO!1"'loges I n excess 0 f $15 000 00 2C Plowlttlf<; reallege paragraphs 2 through 6 hereinabove, and Incorporate thenl herein 21 Plaintiffs are residents Oi Plnellcs County, Florida 22 Defendant IS a ,=Imlda muniCipal corporatl::m '23 PlaintIffs ore the owners of real property In Pinellas County. Florida, more parllcularl\. c:escnbed as 3006 GUlf to Boy Boulevard, Cieolworer, Floildc p18reln "lhe lee I propertv" 21. PiolnhHs acqullecJ SOld ~eC11 properry by purchase of a ;ee $Irnole Intel est en or OOOu t December 9, 1988. 25 DUring rh e Pia Inti ff<;' owne~srllp of SaId reel pro perty, P 101 ntlffs had leased ~"le sucJecl reol pr:Jperly 10 vanous tenards, which "lad beer ard wine lice r,S8S for their resp ec live bus In esses loco led at the su cJe c II e 01 p"operty (26 This IS a cause of ochon lor damages In excess of $75,000 00 ) 4 S.d 12Di>2SSl.2L ~aU...lo-:a.-:a.l:I ~.1:) eS2:01 toO DE: uer ( 27 Plarntlffs reollege poragraohs 2 tnrough 6 1',81 ernabo\le cmd relnc~rporate them hereIn) 28 On August 1 1989, Plolntlffs leased the subject real property t::J J6M Entertainment of Counti)'slde, Inc , which useq lhe premises for a "Dance C1Lib- Restaurant" 29 J8M Entertolnri'ent of Countryside, Inc held an cccupotlonol license for '\ilqhtdub" use and used the subject il$ol property os 0 rllghtclub wdh a 2-COP Beer and Wine License #062-04460 30 JBM En tertolnment of CounTryside. In::: :ransferred Its Interest and hqUOI license to WGW Enterto\nrr.ert, Ire on or about i.."jovernber of 1990 3 1 WG W Entertolnrne nt, I nc completed th e ter ms of II ~ le:Jse and vacated the subject real properiy 32 Plonhffs, upon discovery that V,lGW Entertainment, Inc WGS n::>1 18n8WlnQ lis lease placed a "For Rent" sign on tile rJremlses and began to show ihe properTy f8f renl as 0 nlghtcluD 33. Subsequent to that time, Plolntlffs hove sl""own the sJblect real ~roperty iO 5e" el o! olospectlve tenon ts, bu j those tena n ts we~e 10ld by agents/employees of the Oty of Clearvvater thot the subject real prrJper+y IS noi avallC1ble for use os a rdQhtclub or restaurant 34 Defendant knew or should have known that on occupollonol license for 0 nigrlclub was the only deSignation Issued for Ihe subject real 5 Cd t20v29SL21. F;aU-lO';l.~1:l j::;~1::J ~OE:Ot VO DE uar property since i 990, ann thB use of the subject real properTY by PlainTiff's pnor tenanr wo~ COnTinuous 35 Defendant ha~ applied Its Land Deve!opmenT Code. which wos eflectl'J8 January 1. 2000 and was enacted subsequent to lhe established use of the reo', propertv. to PIOlr,tltf's subject I eol propertv 50 as 10 preveni Plo,ntlff's use of the subject reol property for any vloble economic use 36 Defendont's apphcohon 01 Its Land Developmelit Code to Ploinh,fs' real property and cenlol of February 4, 2000 occupa ~Ionolllcense to prevent all viable economic use of The real oroperty resulted in 0 taking of Plolntlif~' r,::':J1 \t property w'lthout just compens:Jilon in violdtion of Plaintiffs' constltuilonal rights '>'-\?~\- J ">- 1 l",\'<.- )::,-,\0:::;,.. Plclntlfis were compelled -0 sell the subject teol prope1iy lor ...... -P,c,\ ::-'>,,-\- rv.:o.'Z $415,00000. v,hlch was below the fair marKet value of the real ploperty (; rn'i:.l . '-' ~ , ) 37 38 Plolnliffs were damaged by Defendant's actions In an amount equal to the falf market volue of tile sub)ecl real properlY les~ ihe soles proceeds received 39 PlOintlrr5 have retolned the underSigned low firm and agreed to pay 11 reO~OllC) ble 0 I !OI ney's fees WHEREFORE, Plolntlffs demond Judgment aggln5t Defendant for domcges costs of ThiS actlo~" reasonable 0 Iforney's fees, and for such other and further rel:ef os the Cou~t deems appropriate 6 S'd 120VGSS1.2L l=:au.Jo......1::l h.I:J e-Oe::O[ VO DE uer DEMAND FOR TRIAL BY JURY PIOlntlffs herety demonc trial by JUI yon ali Issues S0 trloble 7/' _ ! J /'" Ill, ~ /J ' ~ ......./. , I ~ } I L ,. l , r }{VLv',:/(,-~,,- I '0 ' till '1 I f -I ~_ r:r KIM-TRUe NGUYEN , , ," l 1(1/1/ c_ r ! , THOMAS C llTTl-E7. P A 7 // / ~;./ ~'~/ '; '~A /1> \. /'_/ ' // ~~~~-,//,.,1 G ,d.,-d ~' THOMAS C LITTLE, ESQUIRE 2 i 23 N E Coachman Road Sul1e P, Clearv'I'oler, FL 33765 (727) 443-5773 Florida Bar 1'~lJmber 238783 ,~ - -"'-') " t:;- -~ / / A ~;.; J-; :.;.:- f,' //' l/i.-u /'---------/ / I .p THANffi NGUYEN STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINEL LAS The foregoing Instrument was acknowiedged before me thIS I I':'.A::' _ dOll of October, 2003 by P THANH NGUYEN and T KIM-TRUe NGUYEN, his wife, who IS !~erso:1011yknown-To-me-)Ol has produced cs ldentl:lcoll:Jn and-vvll0aiCfloKe on aad"l NOTARY PUBLIC ", ~,\"'i';" J(l' ,e[(.,.I, Sul\lVl'n ;' t-li '1-;, MY t.I;M~I,oSlON Ii' DD~S2D3' cxrlet':> -. -~~- ,~l I E!br' (], V 5, 1006 ;-.", ~ &' IJ;l1lW~1\ T....P' n~o"" fA 1~ ~'lJl~..J1C1 l~lC Illl ~ (1 ,t/ I) r ;' ] '; (, '-, S \9 n '-- - ,.n,,'?"<.-e..-t f r ! , _ -, eO....r!-. ~,(. (/1:1/ }{) I' '(I Piln t ~~I-i 1"-1(';;" T I~/~ ,\l U L LI V;1l) STATE OF FLORIDA AT LARGE M'l' COI"rlmIS!:.lOI1 expires 7 S.d l20v2SSL.2L kaU.Joq.~1:J hq.1:J ~lE:Ot +0 DE: uer MESIMER & ASSOCIATES Sax'7278984937 Apr 4 '02 15 09 P 01 Ur/fttdW~7 C;~r1.R>>%- 1530 NINTH STREET NORTH 5T PETERSBURG, fL 33104 (121) B~.:i-B5B'4 FAX (121) o~~-4~31 FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION DATE:~2..W1. TIME ~'10r p AGES ~ (INCLUDING COVER) TO-JM M~;I'e-/Wpt1te WJ6 COIvlP ANY. FAXNUMBER: +1t-;,7t1 /tG'l-f~b I FROM: f1eJ H~.9 A\Cf' RE~~ \Jer IF yoU SHOULD RECElVE THIS TRANSMISSION IN ERROR, PLEASE CALL 727-894-8589. ~ ~;: .... " I"'" ~ -l. ~ " ' "I ;," I' l~ I['~r ... \'l r........s " r I MESIMER & ~SSOCIATES F;Qx 7278984937 Apr 4 '02 15 09 P 02 j lill' 01 l~ -1,slfrnvILfnj1 APR 0 4 2002 II ;: LI ,~ J..-:..I1 " PLANN1NG & DEVfLOPII.1ENTSVCSIl - . CllYOI:CtE.'-J\'J,H~R ":~,' - - - --...,.,-=-==:::~ AND ASSOCIATES INC April 4, 2002 Mr Patnck T :Magurre Attorney at Law 1253 Park Street Clearwater, Florida 33756 Reference Phuoc Thanh Nguyen Apphcatlon (CaSe Number FL 02-02-04) 3006 Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard Oearwater, Florida Our File Number 02531.005 Dear Mr Maguue: Per your recent request, I have rev1ewed the Oty of Cearwater's "Community Development Code and Building Regulations" to ascertalll the compatibihty of the proposed parlahg m9dtficatJons to the above referenced property W1th standards and regulations as set forth by the CIty of Oearwater My findIngs follow The property IS currently zoned CommerCla1 (C). Additionally, the site is considered by the City to be a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project The proposed use of the property will be for a "mom and pop-type" or low mtensity.type restaurant Under Secuon 2-704, "'F1exible Development," the :rmmmum number of off~street parking spaces requrred for a restaUrant use is ranged between seven (7) and 15 spaces per 11000 square feet of gross floor area (GFA) A copy of tlus section of the co4e is attached- Based upon a plan prepared by Northside Engmeenng, Ine , the ext.Stmg struct:u.re contalDS apprOXImately 2,132 square feet and 18 parking spaces are proposed, mcluding one (1) space designated for handIcap use Therefore, given the structUre size of approxlInate1y 2,132 square feet, 15 spaces to 32 spaces should be provided to serve the proposed use As stated above, 18 spaces are proposed. I spoke to Mr. Wayne Wells With the Clty of Clearwater to venfy these findings He stated that the City's concern is that the 18 spaces must accommodate patrons as wen as employees Information subnntted to the City states that on the bUSiest shift, five (5) employees will be on-slte Based upon these cntena, 13 parlang spaces will be proVIded for patrons, assuming that all five (5) employees dnve to work and do not carpool, take the bus, or bicycle to work Although the proposed intenor layout of the butldmg is not known, I estimated that approximately 40 percent or approximately 853 square feet, of the buildmg would be unhzed for seat:mg area Based upon informanon prOVided: in the: Architeaural Grnpbu~ StandMds, up to 16 ~~Mtdf~ 1530 N1NiH STREET NORTH ~ ST PETERSBURG, FLORIDA 33704 (727) 894-8589 .. FAX (727) 898-4937 _ _ B ~ To! \ \ f,..... , .. ~~...~..~-~~ .........:=:-- , . ~I "l.:...~l.; '" ~~t \:. I /;"',,"r ro-}..... ~\n ~ ~ --.!.., ~ --' MESIMER & RSSOCIATES :~_x 7278984937 P 03 Apr 4 '02 _ 15 09 Mr. Patrick T Magwre April 4, 2002 Page Two square feet can be utilIzed for an average capacity per person Therefore, I estimate that approxnnately 53 seats can be proVlded for the proposed use Assurrung four (4) seats per vehIcle/parking space, approX1Il1ately 13 parking spaces should be proVIded for customer use In addlnon, several multi-storied office buIldJ.ngs, resIdences, and a hotel are located neat the subject property, thereby Increasing the patenUal for walk.up customers It should also be noted that tlus SIte was prevtously uollzed as a restaurant site, pnor to the Wldening of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard and pnOI to the preVlous "adult use" Tills pnor restaurant use was also a "mom and pop-type" restaurant, a relatively low mtenSity~type use At the tIme of this prevIous restaurant use, the parkmg located on-slte was more than adequate These factors will help reduce the number of on-SIte parking spaces needed to serve the proposed use The current proposed sIte plan proVideS 844 parking Sp'aces per 1,000 square feet of GF A. withIn the feq1llrements as set forth by the City Fma11y I the proposed SIte plan conforms to the nine (9) Flexibility Cntena as prOV'lded m Secnon 2-704 (B) "ComprehensIve Infil1 Redevelopment ProjectS " If you have any questions or If I can prOVIde any addi1:lonal mformallon, please do not hesttate to contact me Very truly yOUTS, -/tL attachment. copy of Section 2-704 of Clty of Clearwater Commumty Development Code copy of pertment sectJ.on of ArcJutectural Graphlc Standards 1..' .1- ~-I; , ,,- MESIMER & ASSOCIATES ~ax 7278984937 Apr 4 '02_ 15'53 P 01 AND ASSOCIATES, ING {tr;rpLitur tf4p~U-- 1550 NINTH STREET NORTH ST PETeRSBUR6, FL 33104 (121) 8'14-858'1 PAX (121) 8'i8-4C131 FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION \ DATE: +. 2 · 2.. TIME: ~:~t.,.. PAGES: ,; (INCLUDING COVER) To' W~~ !JJ~ COMPANY: FAX NUMBER S"~i "~7.G FROM: Pel ~.~ RE' ~;~h:C ~~ (~feI\) IF YOU SHOULD RECEIVE THIS TRANSMISSION IN ERROR, PLEASE CALL 727-894-8589 , ' "'~10.; ~ ~ I , " \ !'" i~:,f ~ {~~jr~jl' .. -~;' \ .. M <l "'~ u.. =_'i>'!:6~CilI'",-L__\ _ O 1,:4f.="~"lh'~"c - t ,:~ ;~-~'~~.~~ ~@J",:~,~a> rwa er >- r IT H" 'r I; ., II... ~ "il::' lll~.(_'_ ~~ (.., ,"'II. -_"'! - ~ U FAX COVER MEMO - CITY OF CLEAR\tVATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE. CLEAR"VATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO. 't.,; -- t1~j oJ\ro.... i C~\). FAX: . 4-t-~. ::,r +1 Phone: 4- +- 2-- ~ ~ 3 g FROM: W,........ \.DJe.\\S Phone:~IoL- 4so4- DATE:_ _2.!2-L..J~2- RE: ~~ C"e..i~..,~T- MESSAGE: NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) ~ FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLl-\NNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE. CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO. N\)r-~:~.L ~~~] FAX: 4-'\'\.0- 2>03~ Phone: +-+), ~ z... ~ \" ~ FROM: \J~~L)\~ 3\DJ~l- Phone:~ \t "2-" +-r'U + 'FL- 0 '1.. ... tl '1.. . t) + DATE: RE: MESSAGE: O(",;~'f'Qv\ \'e..-'J ~'.\.ed. NUIVIBER OF PAGES(lNCLUDJNG 'IBIS PAGE) :3 I FAX COVER MEMO - CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE. -CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO. V ....-+...\. ~,r~ ~~. FAX - ++V - 37 +-1 Phone + Ar 2- - '3 'b.3 ~ FROM: \~~ W~ Phone.~1o 2..~S-O+- DATE:_ 2-1 I~ RE: FL- 02-- 0 'Z...~ t>4 MESSAGE 0 r; 1 '\ ~ \ \ L\j "",0\ ~~t..~ NUMBER OF PA.GES(INCLUDING I'I-IIS PA.GE) 3 r' ) " t _ u.. ~Il,"'- t-... _ ~l...J !11~"I =:'-:":-,hL J o --'flj~\""- -,i(".' rw t ; ~~:~:'::' ~ l >- ~ r-'~I'r. f CI~~~ a er ,;: : _, I~ i~ ':.. ,'u f-- '-"'"_'i.. .=-",:1 -L.'~1 --l;:;~;? () FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 s. MYRTLE AVE. CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO:_P().~\~(. M~_>i,r"- FAX: . t+\I - 3i4-, Phone: 4-+ 2..- 3 ~3 'b FROM: W~-N-- Wl'~ DA TE:_ ~) -.iJ 0 2- Phone:~ 1I '2.. - + SO + RE: '3>> 0 0 ~ ~ \l)L-b ~LJ '\)\\1 d . ~,,\'_*e~ i,. "1 ~c;: ~,~ _ O...J '^^ a. - WA.-. ~ _ A. Co-\- ) . MESSA~~-'.!.c.~~ NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) 2-- ~ ".-- FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEP ARTMEN'r 100 S. MYRTLE AVE. CLEAR""VATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO: P ""~''''\<.. ~ "'\..... FAX: . ~+-~ - 31 +1 Phone. + 4- 2- ~ :!:, & ~ ~ FROM: \,J~~ \,.)l.\'\-S DATE:_ _4-J~iQ2- Phone:~ \0 L. - +5" 0 + lVIESSAGE: RE: 3 0010 ~",~t ~\,,).. ~~t~~~~1C-b\t,~~~ ' NUMBER OF PAGES(lNCLUDlNG THIS PAGE) l-.Sl MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: RE: FIle of Case FL 02-02-04, 3006 Gulf to Bay Boulevard Wayne M Wells, AICP, Semor Planner ~I"'W March 20, 2002 Resubmlttal documents I phoned Patnck MagUIre today at approximately 12 45 pm to mqUIre about the resubmIttal of revIsed sIte plans and applIcatIon matenal (15 caples) requested at the March 14, 2002, Development ReVIew Comnllttee meetmg As of the wntmg of thIS memorandum. there has been nothmg resubmItted Mr MagUIre stated that he had contacted NorthsIde Engmeenng and was told they thought the deadlIne was Thursday the 21 s., not Tuesday the 19th Mr MagUire was to phone Northslde Engmeenng back to ascertam when reVIsed SIte plans would be avaIlable .'Ii * From: Planning Department - ~~-\~ ~Q2Sl.D- Planner Requesting Maps FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT MAP REQUEST Please prepare the following maps 1 Color Aerial Photograph with the property outlined and streets marked 2 Location Map 3 Zoning Map 4 EXisting Surroundmg Uses Map Requested on ~\ 'x\ t)3.. For Completion by. ::r'dcJ \ (') d- Survey Attached: 0 Legal Descnptlon Attached 0 Comments ~ old N~S -\0 CJr\~ CCZhL-<<- ~ ()'(\~ ~ GSlSL ~ '2uJJ~ - CASE: SITE: PIN:/(p, ATLAS PAGE: dqa A- S \P1:ll1lllng Depaltment\C D B\form~ and shclls\rv1ap reque~t fOJ ms 2001 for CDB\MapRequestFormFLS-FL doc ~ "" Date" Apnl3, 2002 ~--~............ ~~-~01.? \\~\ /, \~~ \\~') \ L, U ..1~L_S..,\ \ \ t\ \\ Pi L-" - -- '1 1 \ \,\ \\J~ \,\,;~ 1\ ...~ n"2 \', i '~\ \\\ \ APR t1 '5 2uu ! : -~ ' \ t\ I \ \ \'_.1 l2 .", \ _ ' ~, ._ __' ~ 1 ~ 1.,.".t ,....t ! - -- .- l~_ _~. _ To' City of Clearwater Community Development Board From Thomas & Barbara Maas 3004 Carolina Ave Clearwater, Fl 33759 L~ Ref. Pubhc Hearmg Apnl 16, 2002 Item #2 (enclosed) TIns is to notify the Commuruty Development Board of our objection to the proposed reduction of parking spaces for the Nguyen's RestaUl:ant Overflow parkIng from the WLlder Center IS already creatmg a burden on the homes frontmg Carohna Ave. Granting tins request to allow another business to have inadequate parkmg will only mcrease the parkmg problem in tlus area If the Board grants this request for the Nguyen's it would be our request to create a No Parkmg Zone on Carolina Ave Thank you for your attention to tins matter. ~ J)u (9 fl3 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Case: DRC date: CDn date: CORRESPONDENCE/CONVERSA TION TRACKING FORM ~G D?~ -' o&~ 04, 3.- P-r-=- () L 7t-$O-O"L- b~~s't (';opy Available Include all conversatrons related to the case wIth contact and phone number, date recel'vea correspondence/plans, etc 3~ . -D~ ...f. f 07. ~~ -jo (f frn" (-''<4- IW{g~ - ~ ~ (M ~n;.~t~ c... \\a. ~ ~ >,.,... .~.. ~ -!:., <.\~ 5.... \........ ~ p.... ..-,~ "!a~"',l~...... ~~~ ~e.A. \-\$(""'.......CI...r ~r-. 411 ~,t.<: ~..:r.:i . 1 ~\e.~ 'hQ~ \"'\llI-\-;_ev ~r. - h~ ~.~, h~ ta.'l<1~~ h:...t ~ g.,r. \". '""l ~j "'" ~ Qo. \~':'h o..r-...\ .~ \J~ "~tD". \-;"....... . ~cA. -.a cr. ~ ~ H-e. A. t'\.o t ~ 'l'\NQf'"" ~ r-. h'l\.t A- 'e.'\\v- bt b't~.s ~ vv-.. ~ ~"j v\ra.- ~Q \. :t\.,..-t1 ~~~~ ~ A-- ~",-.t'-ll ~.O'- 4 :t. O"L ~1:oL.. ~~1- Ar-l~ Jo z- --1:-1\ "Q ~"L. 5 \P!aJllllllg Departmelll\C D !1Iforms alld shells\Mlscellolleouo\correspondellce {l1ld CUllverl>Gl101l lrar!.mg \heel doc r/ Receipt No 1200106633 J..-- Date 2/22/2002 ""'-- Line Items Case No Tran Code Description FL 02-02-04 04 Flexible CommerCial Payments Method Payer Check THANH '" /... Revenue Account No 010-341262 Amount Due $1,20500 Bank No Acet Cheek No 1028 Amount Paid TOTAL AMOUNT PAID $1,205 00 $1,205 00 - -~F-~ r-=--- .1'" - ~ ; L, ' ---------------- .,. ., ~-------- .' -----.j. ' , .,--.-.~ A Ir-Ol-02 12 38 From-RICHARD~ .', KEY ATTYS 727-446-3741 T-462 P 02/07 F-30S -- J ./ ... Mr. Patrick T. Maguire A ttnrnpY at Law 1.253 Park Street Q.earwater, Florida 33756 o. · ~.) t-<:-'" c.:, ~'O1, Ma.td129, 2002 Reference: Phuoc Thanh Nguyen Application (Case Number: FL 02-02-(4) 3006 Gulf-to-'Bay Boulevard Clea.nvat=", Flonda Out File Number. 02531.005 Dear Mr_ Magpite: Per your recent :request, I have revIeWed. the CitY of Clearwater's "Community Development Code and Builc.hng Regulations" to ascertain the compatibility of the proposed parking modJncariOD$ to the above referenced property with standards and regulations as set forth by the City of Clearwater. My findings follow. The property is currently zoned Commercial (C). Additionally, the site 15 considered by the City to be a Comprehf>n!ll've Infill Redevelopment Project. The propos;ed use of the plUpc.lty ~ be for a UInorn aDd pop..type" or law intensity..type restaurant. Under Section 2--704, "Flexible Development," the minbtIUm nwnher of o1f"'StTeet parking spaces required. for a restaurant use is ranged between seven (7) and 15 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross tloor area. (GFA). A copy of tbis section of the code is att~rhM Based upon a plan prepared by Northside Engineering, Inc., the existing StrUCture contains approximately 2,132 square feet and 18 parking spaces ate pt~ ~ one {I} ~ des:ignated for haJ1diaa:p 1W!. Therefore. gi.'v@I1 the st:ructnre size of approxim~tel:y 2,132 square feet, 15 spaces 'to 32 spaces should be provicied to serve the proposed. use. As stated above, 18 ~ ate proposed. I spoke to "Mr. Wayne WeDs with the City of Oearwatet ro verify these findings. Be stared that the City's concem is that the 18 spaces must accommodate patrons as well as employees. Information submitted to the City states that on the busiest shift. five (5) employees will be on-sire. Based. upon these criteria, 13 parking spaces will be provided for pauons, assuming that an five (5) employees drive to work and do not carpoo1, take the bm I or bicycle to work. In additimlt several muld-storied office buildings, ~Monl'151 and a hotel are 10cate6 near the subject property, thereby in~ the gorential for walk-up customers It should also be noted that tbis site was prevIously UUlUa1 a8 a restaurant ~le, prior to 1bC: w2.0("fll~ or OUlt..t:o-'lJi\Y ~~lUfd~ 1530 NINTH STREET NORTH · ST PETERSBURG, FLORIOA 33704 1727\ 894..s5ae. FAX (7271898-4937 A I r-O 1-02 12 38 F r om-R I C HARD~ - I KEY A TTYS 727-446-3741 T-462 P 03/07 F-305 Mr. Patrick T. Maguire Mard129,2002 Page Two Boulevard and prior to the previous ~adult use." This pnor rest:amant use was also a umom and pop-type" restaUJaIlt, a relatively low intensity-type use. At the tune of this previous restaurant use, 1he park:ing Ioc:ated on-site was more than adequate. :fhese factors will help reduce the number of o~site parkins spaces needed. to serve the proposed use. The current proposed site plan provides 8.44 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of GFAl witbin the requirements as set forth by the City. Finally) the proposed. site plan conforms to the nine (9) Flexibility Criteria as provided in Section 2..704 (B) "Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Projects." If you have any questions or if I can provide any additional information, please do not hesitate 10 contact: me. Very truly yours, MESlMERAND ASSOClATES,INC. 111. . Frederick: J. Mortimer, AlCP Vice President attal"hment: copy of Section 2-704 of City of Clearwater Community Development Code , 11 , \ II II I I 1- i j (~ Apr-Ol-02 1, 39 From-RICHARD~ ~llKEY ATTYS 727-446-3741 - T-462 P 04/07 F-305 t 2>0708 OOMMTJN1'I'Y D,gvzuJPMEN'!' CODE 2. The pamd proposed for development is EWt cont1gDoUi to a parcel of land which is dasignabad as msidantial in tb Zofliag ~ 3. No 6U'eI. suitable for the wp!ay of vehi. cle& for &ale 16 loc:ated witb.in the front \ setback of the parcel proposed for devel- opment. 4-. ProvisiOJ1 is made to dun outdoor lighting at all tunes when the automobile sales BD.d 6fJn'ioe uses is not opeu to the pt1blie to that level neGNsary to maintain the !lIIecunty oftbe premises; 6. The use of the parcel proposed far devel~ opR:l.ent fronb' on but will not involve direet .see89'S to a major arterial street. U. \l:wiMr:y offices. or gnirn.al groamJngl boartUnc 1. Thft ~t11 FOPMeCl for developmaa.t is not contiguous to Il parcel of'land which is designa.ted as resJd.snt;W in the Zoning Atlaa: 2. The use of the parcel proposed for duvil. opment doe6 not involw 8.Dimal cannne- ment facilities that are open to the out- side. - COrd. No 6417-99,' 3, 8.19-99i ON. No. 6526-00. f 1., 6--15-00) Seetiol1 1-704. FJezible developlDeut. The follawf.ni U&es are Level Two permitted USe8 in the lie" Distnr.:t subjeet: to the standards and criteria. set out 111 thia ser:tI.on amd. other apphcable provieians of ArtIcle 3. 7b6/.c 3.704 -c- DIstrict FleDbk: D~pm.eflr St4t1do1W MIJI. Lo1 J4Cl%. !1m MM. lA: Ar$lJ mdrh H~hl Front Mln. Su14 Mi.rl. Be"" MUL Off-Slr&at tT6t ('ii' {I.) (ftJ (ft.) (ftJ (ftJ (ftJ PcJrldT16 Aleohcbc'Beverasa Saks 6,000-10,000 6Q....100 25 15-25 0-10 l~D 6 per 1,000 GFA Det&rm.iI1ed. by thll 1l'llm1Dun.l~ developmeDt Com~st~ Inl1lL llaordinaJOl' Dill o/a wu. n/a via cI:i1 bued an the rtedevclapmen't ~l) IiIP~ uae andfar ITE Manual stan. darda L1ght AatwmbI,. 5,000--10,000 60-100: lIfi 11l--2S 0-10 1(1.....20 4-6 uplICCII per 1,QOO QVA. Luru~ VeJucle 6ervial ~Oo-.lO,OOO ~100 211 l5-2:l 0-10 10-20 4-6 ~ per 10000 GrA Mhed UllU &,000-10,000 80-100 i$-$O 1s-$5 o----lO 10--:0 t--5 IlPlSOO8 pet 1.000 GFA N"~b:1uba 15,000-1(1,000 ~100 ZS 1~ 0-10 lD-20 10 pur 1,000 QFA CIffif:tm 5,000-10,000 I 50-100 25--60 ~ 0-10 10-..20 5--4 spatlM pcilf' l,DOOCPA Ofr-8t:uot Pllrldl:r.r 10,000 100 DIll. ~ 0-10 10..-..20 DIa ~ NIL 1 CD2.54 , }. j,. Apr-OH2 12 39 727-446-3741 T-462 P 05/07 F-305 From-RICHARD~ ~ILKEY ATlYS ZONING DIS'l.'lUCTB 12-104 ~b" 2.704. "0- District. JIta:Jble Dweloprru!nt B'~ NUl. Let M4:c. M~n. Mu.. l.oJ A1Ya MrICfth Hdsht htm, A(Ul. SkU MU'$. R.mr M"m.. Off-3trtd Vae (1(1 ftJ (ftJ (/lJ (ftJ (ftJ f/tJ hri'n8 1--10 pc: 1,000 SQ IT orland area ur all de- Outdow ftogw.~ temlin8d by t1UI 20,000 lOCI 25 15-115 10 11]...20 CMUnunitY de- mut vclopmltnt oocr- dmlltor ba;ud. CD. m !l!muN aWldllrda O\1eJmpt A.:oammodab.aua 20,000------40.000 100-200 26-GO 1&-25 0-10 10-30 11* urdt ~~1/'1I 6,000 SO is ts-:l5 10 ID----20 IS q:31lOl.1L1 pi:' 1,-000 SF GFA Re8taulUtG 3,1:100-10.000 S5-1CO 26-liO 16-26 0-10 10-.20 7-16 spaces pot 1,000 GFA Retail SaM and SeMca:$ 5,000-10,000 56--100 26-40 1 G---4fi 0-10 10-20 +--6 pPaa:8 per l,OOIl GFA RV Padul "'0,000 200 25 16-2fi 20 10--20 1 apatlll par lW lipa.te 1 per :w umtB Sel! StMBp 20,000 lOG 25 15-25 10 )0-;20 ph~B 2 for znanapYa of. .oct , 8ocia.lIPublie SetvI.ne Agee. 5.000-10,000 50-100 ~ 15-2& 0-10 IB--20 3-4 IlJ40IIIl pm' cm6) l,DOll OFA Refer to \ 'l'B1llCOmDmJUClltllm Ttmml lD,D 00 100 BlI!cUOn 26 10 20 JJIa 34001 2.& ~ per VehicIR SalselD1apla7s 10,(J()0-..4.0 ,000 lGO-2OD 25 16-26 10 10---20 1.,000 SQ FT of 1= WI'JIl. V~ OffiClilll fd' GroomIng 6,000-10,000 00-100 25 15-25 0--10 lo-.gD 4 1lp1l.ClI:II prr lI!ld B~ l.ODO GFA (1) AnY U6i approvBd fur a ComprehenSive; Infill RedeveloplllQtl.t Proj~ r;bsll bll pe%'m1tted. bp the undmyJng F\Itu:re Land U$18 :F11111 Map designabon. (2) SaaaJl:pubIie 5el'Vice agen~ mall not exceed five acreB Flmbility criteria.: A. .AlcDho1lc beve~ saks. 1. Lot.o&n: a. The parcel proposed fhr development is not contiguous to a parctl of land whkh is designated as re~dentlal 10 tbe Zonmg Atlaa. b. 1'he parcel proposed fol' development ill ugt located. witbm DOC reet of a psrcel of land used for if, place of worship or publIc or private school UDles5 the floor area of the \l~e which is devDted to the display and storage of aleoho1ic ~ 11 leg than ten percent of the total floor area M the use and tJiere is no 5igDage l0- cated on the partel pro:PORd far de- SIl'PP. !If 0. 3 CD2~5 , I Apr-ol-o2 12 39 from-RICHARD' I KEY A TTYS 727-446-3741 T-462 P 06/07 f-305 t' ~ 1 , . j COMMUNI'N DEVELOPMENT COOl 1 12-'104 I r ~ mQpment which idcm't:l.fies the use 3. The \lIIllS wit:h1n the comprehensive in1ill as a loeati.on where aleobalic beveJ'>o redl'!Velopment project are otherwise per- ages 4U'G GOld; m1tted in the City of ClalUV1ater; c.. n.e pareel proposed fOJ'dwelopment 4. The \.lOh or mix of uses within the- cow.- is. not 10eatad within 500 feet of a preb,ODBive infi1l redevelopment projact pareel of laDd used for a place of are compatlb1e mtb acijacuDt land W1BSi ~ or a. publie or pnvate school unless the interwni.ng land uses, 5. Suitable Bite!l for dlJ'Ve1opmG~t Dr :relieve!.. IStruetures or COD.~ are such that opment of the use5 or mi:!" of qses within the location of the alcoholic. beverage the cOIIIprebensive in.fill redevelopment 6ales is unlikely to bave an advene pl"Q,ject are not other9lUle available in the impaet on such school or use as a City of Clearwater; place of worship, 6 The development of the parcel proposed d. The U&ie of the parcel proposed for for development as a com.preb.ensiv"e infill development will not lDvolVtl direct redevelopment project will uppade the access to a Jn01Qor lUterlal street, immediat.G vic:inity of the parcel proposed 2. Lot Mt!ll1ru1 wtdrh: The reduction in lot for development; area and/or will not result in a building 7. The design of the ptopoMd compreben- which is O1.\t of ecale Wlth exllitiD.g' build.. mg5 in the immediate vicinity at the par- SiVlil inDll redevelopment prqject ereates a form and funtt:icm. wlueb enhances the eel proposed for development. community character of the iaunediate 3. Fron.f JSetba&k. The red.uctJ.on in fnmt Bet.- viclruty of the parcel propo,ec} !or devel~ back rwultr. in. an improved site platt or opJ:d.8D.t and the City of Clearwater aD a improvfJd ~ ag,d appearance whowj 4. Side (jnd rear setback: 8 FlexJb1llty in regard to let width, reqUIred a. The reduction 1n side and rear set- setbacks, he1c-ht and off~atnet parking back doea ngt prevent aCcefj8 to the arejustified by the benatiu. to [:ornmunity rear of at1Y bwldmg by emecgancy character and the Uuwed1at.e vi.ctmty of vehicles; the parcel propased for development and b. The reductioQ iD. "'de and rear set- the CIty of Clearwater as a whole; back reswts in an unproved site plan, 9 Adequate off-atteet parking in the i.mme- more efficient parlung layout or 1IIl~ d1ate vicinity acconling to the:ihared park- proved design BIld appell.J1U1te and ini formula in Division 14 of Article 8 will land8Cl:.\lpod areal: 2rliI in ~e8U of the be avallable to avoId OD-Bt:reet; parldng 111 miaimum required. the immeduste vicinity of the pa:rcel pro-. B Comprehe.7lJ1We i.rifill redevelopment prqjectB posed fer developmeg,t. 1. The development or redevelopment of the C. Lieht assembly pareel praposed fur d~pment fa othw- 1 Lot (Uta cuul width: The red1;l.l;bon in lot wise imprac:t1Cal WltbOut deviations from the use, intensity eo development stan- area and/or width will not result in B dud&; buildmg w1;uch 11 Clut of salle Wl.th exi.sta 2. The deve1opm.el1t of the ~l prQpo.lIed ing bui1d.ing$ in the l.m1'tl8diate vidJUty of the partel proposed fOt development. for development as a eomprehenBiw :infill re~&~~tp~e~wmnMma~~ 2. Front retba.ck: The ndttction in front set-- reduce the flm' market value o! abuttmg back results in an improved site plan or &,..~INl; :WI.:p=ved dceign _d lilpPl'lartm.ee. L .. Supp, NI). B CD2:06 t , i r I< I, ' " 'I' ~I * " 1 " ~ ~ \l J i ~ -i . ,., .. ~ a, ~,' 'i I ~ 4' \!! j ~ r i ~ ..: 'i:: Apr-O 1-02 12 3g From-RICHARD~-"I Key ATTYS - I , . 72r.446~3r41 T-462 P or/OT F-305 IONrNG DISTmCTS ; I ~ ~ , 3. Sttk a.1l.tl rear Ntbock: a. The reQU(!tion in Bide edlor rear setback does not prevent access: to the leU Df any buUdlng by emer- geney vebidea; l . ] ~ .t! r 1\ ~ , : t J' 6uJlp. No. 8 CD2:l56.1 i 2-704 ~ " -----'""j""'"'""-' - ~ I MESIMER & ASSOCIATES Fax 7278984937 Apr 4 '02 P 04 15 10 ~ 2 703 CO;),rr..lilltl1"l DEVELOP~lE~"T CODE 2. The parcel proposed for development is not contiguous to a parcell'lfland which IS desIgnated as residentlal in the Zoning Atlas, 3 No area swtable for the dIsplay of vehi- cles (or sale is located wItlun the front setback of the parcel proposed fOf devel- opment, 4. Provision is roade to dlm outdoor bghtlng at all times when the automobile sales and servlce uses IS not opep. to the pubhc to that level neceSSary to maIntain the secunty of the premises, 5 The use of the pa.rcel proposed for davel. opment fronts on but will not Involve dU"ect access to a major arterlal street U. Vetermary offices, or ammal grooming I boardmg 1 Th!! parcel proposed for development is not contiguous to a parcel ofland winch is designated as reS1dentIal m the Zocing Atlas; 2 The use of the parcel proposed for devel. opment does (lot involve anunal confine- ment faclhhes that are open to the out. side (Ord No 6417.99, ~ 3,8-19-99, Ord No 6526-00, ~ I, 6.15.00) SectIon 2-"104. Fle:rcible development. The followmg uses are Level Two penuitted uses In the "c" DIstrict subject to the standards and cntena set out 1.0 thIS sectiOn and other applicable prOVISiOns of Article 3 Tablt 2 704 'C' DIStrict Fle:r.!/:JIe Deudopmenc Standards lv["1 Lot Mat:. MUL M", Lot AMra W,dtn. H.ecght Front Mm. Stde Mtn Rew Mill OIT SIN!f!t Uu (,q (t) (fI) (ft) (ft) (ft) (rn Parking Ncoh.ohc &VCfllg-e S:1I.es 5.0OG-IO.OCO 50-100 25 15-25 0-10 10-20 5 per 1,000 GFA I Det.efnHn~ by the e:ommUll,ltj developn\enL CompreheflSi\e Irlfl11 e:oordmator rV~ rJa. nlt1 nJa nla- nia bllsed on the Redevelopment PtOJect(ll ap<"clfic use and/Qr ITE Manual stan. dards LIght ~embll' 5000-tO,000 50-100 25 15-25 0-10 11)-20 4--5 spa= fIllr 1.000 CFA limIted Vetude S"...."'e 5.000--10 000 50-100 25 15-25 0-10 10--20 4-5 spateS pe-r 1,000 GFA Mixed Uaa 5,000-10,000 50-100 25-50 15-25 0-10 10-20 4--5 spaces per 1,000 OFA Nightclubs 5,000-10,000 50--100 25 15-25 0-10 10-20 10 per 1.000 OFA Offices 5,000-10,000 50-100 25-50 15-25 0-10 10---20 3......oi spaces ~r 1,000 GFA orr..stl'eat Patkmg 10,000 100 nla. 15-25 0-10 10-20 nla SloIFP No 1 CD2'fi4 " I J ~ 0( (!? t' " ). ::~ti) \(--::.. .,Im ~---~,-~.. ~....~..:.................-........... ~~ ~ ~ .. MESIMER & ASSOCIATES Fax 7278984937 15 10 P 05 ~- Apr 4 '02 ZOl'l'1NG DISTIUCTS ! 2.704 - Table 2-704 'C. Dum" Flextble Deue[apment Standards 1J III LeI M(I.X MUl. Mill Lot Nea W1dth Hel$ht Fron' Mm. Stde Mill. Renr M~n.. Off-SInd Use (sq ft J (ft J (fl ) ((tJ (ft) (ft J ParklllB 1-10 per 1,000 SQ PI' of lal1d area or as de- Outdoor RecreationtEntertain- term1l'l~d by the 20,000 100 25 15-25 10 10-20 commumty de- ment velopment eoor. dmator based 011 rTE :Manl.lsl standard", OvernIght Attorn modatLons 20,OOQ...-40,OOO 100-200 25-50 15-25 O-HI 10-20 1 per unlt Problematlc U~ea 5,000 50 25 15-25 10 10-20 5 Sp3ees per 1.000 Sf" OFA RestauranU 3,500-10,000 35-100 25-50 15-25 0-10 10-20 7-15 spl1em~ per 1,000 GFA RetaLI Sale~ and Sen lel?5 5,000--10,000 SQ.-lOa 25-50 15-25 0-10 10-20 4-5 apaCf:9 per 1,000 GFA 'RV Parks 40,000 200 25 15-25 20 10--20 1 space per RV space 1 per 20 umtll Self Storage 20.000 100 25 15-25 10 10-20 p1\lS 2 for m>l.nager'g of- lice Sodll.VPubhc SCJ'\ Ie>) \gen 5,000-10.<)0() 50-100 25-50 15-25 0-10 10-20 3-4 spareS per eles{2) 1,000 OFA Reier to TeJecomrn\.lO't:ltlon Towers 10,000 100 seeLL on 25 10 20 nla 8-2001 2: 5 SpllC~ per VehIcle Sale5l'Olsplays 10,000-40,000 100-200 2:; 15----25 ~O 10-20 1,000 SQ IT of lot area Vetepnll.lj' Offices or Groonllng 5,000-10000 50- J 00 25 15-25 0-10 10-20 4. spaces per and Boardmg 1,000 GFA (1) My usa npproved for" Comprehensive Inflil Redevelopment Project shall be permItted by the underl)'lng Future Land Use Plan Map deslgnatloa (2) Sodallpublic service" agencies shall not exceed five acres Fle'Xiblhty criteria: A. AlcoholLc beverage sales 1 Locatf.on a The parcel proposed for development is not contlguouS to a parcel orland whith 15 designated as resldenttal in the Zoning Atlas, b The parcel proposed,for development IS not located withln 500 feet of a parcel of land used for a place of worship or publtc or private school unless the floor area of the use w hleh 1$ devoted to the display and storage of alcohohc beverages IS less than hm percent of the total floor area of the lH.e and there 1$ no signage lo- cated on, the paJ;"cel proposed for de- Supp No 3 CD2 55 pO ..\ I '" ~ . :?il " fit J :! J l ~ i; , !I I: 'I I d t I MESIMER & RSSOCIRTES ~ax 7278984937 Rpr 4 '02 15'10 P 06 f 2-"/04 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE .....elopment which Id~mttfies the use 3 The uses within the comprehenslve infill as a locatIon where alcohohc bever- red~velopmetlt project are othenvlse per- ages are sold, IIlltted in the City of Clearwater; c The parcel proposed for de.....elopment 4 The uses or mix of uses within the cOlU- IS not located withm 500 feet of a prehen51ve infill rede1/'elopment project parcel of land used for a place of are compattble with adjacent land uses, worshIp or a publlc or pnvate school unless the intervening land uses, 5 SUItable sites for development or redevel~ structures or context are such tbat opment of the uses or mix of uses within the l.oc~tlon of the akoholIc beverage the comprehensIVe mfill redevelopment sales IS unlikely to have an ad,,'erse project are not otherwise avallable In the Impa~t on such school or use as a City of Cleanvater, place of worship; 6 The development of the parcel proposed d The use of the parcel proposed for for development as a comprehensive infill development will not Involve dIrect redevelopment project wlll upgrade the access to a maJor arterial street; Immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed 2 Lot area and WIdth The reduction m lot for development, area andlor Will not resul t In a buIlding 7 The design of the proposed com pre hen. which is out of seale mth En(lstmg buIld. ings In the hnmedlate VlClmty of the par- $lVe mfill redevelopment project creates a form and functlon which enhances the eel proposed for development comrouni.lj' character of the immediate 3 Front setback The reductIon m front set- VlCLruty of the parcel proposed for devel- back results in an unproved site plan or opment and the CIty of Clearwater a.s a Improved design and appearance whole, 4 Side and rear sJ:tback 8 Fle:ublltty to regard to lot WIdth, :required a, The reduction in side and rear set. setbacks, helgnt aii.d off-street parking back does not prevent access to the arejl.lsbfied by the benefits to commumty rear of arty bUlldmg by emergency cha.racter and the ImmedIate vIcimty of vehicles, the parcel proposed for development and b The reduction 111 side and rear set- the City of Cleanvater as a \,hole, back results in an unproved site plan. 9 Adequate off-street parking to the Imme- more efficient parking layout or 1m- diate vicini ty accordmg to the shared park. proved deSign and appearance and ing formula l!l. PIv1SIOtl. 14 of Miele 3 WIll landscaped areas are in C;(C€5S of the be aV3ilable to aVOid on-:street parking m mimmum required the Immedlate VIcinity of the parcel pro- , B Comprehenswe mfill redevelopment projects posed for development 1. The development or redevelopment of the e Light assembly parcel proposed for development 16 other- 1. Lot area and tuidth The reductIOn m lot WIse Impracb~al WIthout deviations from the use, mtenslty and developluenl stan- area andlor Width Will Ilot result in a dards, buildmg WhICh IS out of scale with eXIst- 2 The development of the parcel proposed ing buildmgs in the unmedlate V1clmty of the parcel proposed for development for development as a comprehensive>lnfill redevelopment project will not materially 2 Front setback The reduction in front set. reduce the falI" market value of abutting back results in an improved slte plan or prop erb es, )mprQ'Ved. d~Slgn and appes.r3.n"'", Supp No 3 CD2 56 ~ ~"'l" to ~ I' I....) \. II .L~ ~~ 1>r' (.,1... ,1"'1 :()~~~~- ....~_....~_I MESIMER ~ RSSOCIRTES fax 7278984937 " < I' 1, ~ 1 I j' ~ I . t .11 . ) ~ lL ~ , ~ ' r ... "~,.].f J..~N r.A...1........... I l " ~ ~ , ;'1 , ~ . -i '. ", .. '. $ ~ , ;1. -:.::[ ;1 ZONING DISTRICTS 3. Sule and rear setback a The reductIon In sIde and/or rea. setback does not prevent access to the rear of any bul.ldmg by emer- gency vehicles; Sl.lpp NI:I 3 CD2 56 1 ...... t..... f4........ I .-I: 1/_... ... _"r~~''''' ~ ---1..1' ' Rpr 4 '02 15 11 .. L,,}J., ~ P 07 ~ 2.104 ", c ( , '1 ' ~\ , \\"~", I' ;::, MESIMER ,& RSSOCIRTES Fax '7278984937 Rpr 4 'OL 15 11 P.08 Ramsey / Sleeper - tr ..-, , .' '. .,' _, r \ I... ~ I I ;rc"":,"Jr,. , ' orJ \' , ~J\ ~/~~~~ ~- "I"';.)lh'i~~ ...- \ J .l,f:=';' "'f~~j "'. I ........... Ete:hrh E(/itiofl JOHN RAY HOKE JR., AlA Editor in Chief THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS \~-""""1 ~ \.....? j L.... .... r ~ I{' ... I ;,I"i:r k ...L..';-~:r\l'''1 J ~"'8.~ ~ I ~, ~ MESIMER & RSSOCIRTES Counters and Seating CUI TOt-lG:Ol AC' IV.T'!' ZOt IE: .' oJ. ? -e" , --... "'0 I tjCl'" ~'O" ~. ' h 1 "U~ -1 JAIUl: ~ A OR e x :2.0' 1Q 2: 10" 10 2'.6' :1 6" :I .6" 10 3'.6' to 3.0" 4' 3' FA-X 7278984937 Rpr .4 '02 CU:';;"I'O""E.R ACT''',jy ZONe.; I "B '?b ~~e U't;/ii ~ copy Avag;tble <:: 1l'lCl..E: Pe:R!lONS\ A fIlECTANC3L.E PE~50NS A I EI :2 :>. 6" to 2'-0. to ;I. C" :2 .6. 2 lon 0119 3 4' 10 I glde' 4'-0' 6 5 .1Q. to :2 .6.10 6 O. 3 O' e (; .10' to " O' 4-5 3'6" 104' 0" 6-7 4 .6' 10 6' 0' 7-11 5.6.1064" B-1D IS 0.107'-2" ~ t--... l,~ ~~--+ r 1 : I 1/-1 r f (j Seal be, " to $e~l back 5 0' to 6' 2" OM pet an per $,de :2.{J to 2' 6' Two p91 O~ pel ~,de 3 6 to 4'.6 ' l'tecomlT ~"13ed mu,mYJT1 for !!lIIlng and ~le8~,ng 4' 0' 3' 0" 1\ 4 0 2'.6 ,'.6 :lTE 'aJ regu I tl 00li de ltrm<fle ae lual boo th ~ r:e~ ,. S bie, , or~cn :2.n ,h~\<l< ,"on $O~\' "nd m,y M~e rou"ded d& CirOI lar boolhs have o"~rall dlsm~tel 01 I) -4 ;- ~I "I ~ F 0 10 4" G :I: ,'-8' )0,201026' A 8 -4 Co' 1 " B 1 6 10 2'-0 C 2.4 to ';'.2' o 2 -6 to 3' 0' E 20102-6' 1 Fato" J G 1 10 to 2 2' I( H :2 a lo:2 10" L ~lOTE Flallo of coun ,or ~teOI$ tQ se"""" Is 10 1 11 101 7 to 9 6 to 9 2.6 to 3 9 103 6 (0) 5 9' I 1, Uft~-i e>>eK BAR ::IT!! I dlm~n' ,n3 _ m.n,m"", dooron""~ SUM\<;) I<lYQ",. oh<lw yonoral GO"r'guratlOn_ ~r>d 3te I\ot Intended 10 d~111C1 ,ny eC,!la ty, 0 of CI~rat[on "Bblo~ miJY 00 COn~'leo from squ~ro 10 round to elllBlgo s~~tlng "3p...'t~ 80Glh seatlll9 m~~e~ rootl V9 \ ,3 "'I COlnBI spac. ViiiC'i l.. ee:ATING ARRANGEMENTS 1 '~ortl. J tilullo, W3$hlf19\On Grove, M<>ryI~nd ",.Gn~$(: <) AtIOO<)l..t<l~, lire fOO<l Service Con.::;ul1 a nt~ washington D C :. 15 12 P,09 NOTD': flou"4 tables arB IlSl.Islly rm:ommended OI1ly for ..aM\; 5 l1e rSon. or mora O,ml!""'OIl 'A" ~p ends on too pcromelet f l' 1 0" to 1'.0 . pl!rl"'rlionl netos""ry 10 sell\: regu/lad lIumbel For C(lC~U,ls 1'-6" IS ~uf~eJent T e ble SWider than 2: It-6 In wm ~C~l one a: ea r:.~ end Mlmmurl\ sIzes ale satl$13ettlry for drink :oeNICe: 1.;:t'~W SIZes Illr fOQd TaWos With wld~$p'elKl tIllsos Br. more pr.:o<: beal tllan four Iggged t:lblt>lI Tablea and a,,~ngememll are aflcctec1 by me "1';><1 01 1I,,"'''IIQn= :on<lIM s'vle 01 s..t'V\ce T~. U'I! 01 tI.m.~ tr<,yt I)uil'ng eDriS, hl~h eM""'. for chlldlen and pendl capp\!<.l accoss 1l"\I$1 l)il conslt1e1ad, ~io IT , r-- Plo I ~~ CMAIIll STOOL AVERAGE CAPACITIES PER pERSON 'l'y~g OF ROOM SOUAR~ HET BanQuel 10-12 Cafetefla 12"lS Te~'oom 10.14 lunchroomleoHe!' ~op 12.16 o ,"'\Lng room/restau rafl I 13 - 16 Spc"I~lty/fo(m~ll:I,n,ng 17-'22 NOTE FI9Vre~ Bfe general 'ltld re~em minimum av",asc dimenSIOns. No ma~lmum exlSt'i. SC"lln~ all~!'I<;e~ and ,.qu 1n:",enIS may '~'V to ""I ondlVldual o".r~t'OM GENERAL DESIGN CRITERIA S,,"',(> lll.t..s 30-42 '" 1 SQ~.'e :;C~I,ng 66 '" mlmmum be(W!!en !ilbles 30 ,n al ~Ie pi" ~ two cha'rI b...:l<: to b;:e k '2 0 "gonal sea"n9 36 In """,mum batween COrne'l 0113bls! 3 Wall ..."t",g 30 In mlll,mum bel:w~eI'I w~l, and Se.ill bac~ 4 M,n'mum of ;m in for bus carlS and f1~rr"ng leMee cai'1l C", tom Sf "'$Iel: , Reler:o Io<:al code, IlIf (C$lrl(;.llons on rnqy"cm~n:. 2 Wllee1chaor roQUI rom~ntl, 35-44 on ...It 3 W.II Sl:;~ (,,,g, 30 In mtn lmum beMeen w.lI. and t.blt Tablel 1 A",,'"g<>:!~ I~ h I~h 2 ,c.rlow ~p a ell ~r ou fl(! doors Bnd lood :;e IV' ea ate5, Ydj;' c~----:k-- o ~,:g,'TO~ Q:P Cl.EA"ANCr.:S. ..c:..,... r ......,!I"of ~~ .....~~!IiIiii) $0 I -6- I..,M1,.e;c PASS...",!: e III 21- 6u TO ~ -0" SERV11;:t;: AieL!: .' F .' 4_~ I~ rl". ,}1 , " r CDB MeetIng D;;lte Case Number Agenda Item Apol ] 6,2002 FL 02-02-04 D2 CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT ST AFF REPORT OWNER! APPLICANT: Phuoc Thanh Nguyen LOCATION: 3006 Gulf to Bay Boulevard REQUEST: Flexible Development approval to reduce the reqUired number Qf parkmg spaces from 15 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area (32 spaces) to 844 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area (18 spaces), reduce the front (south) setback from 25 feet to 3 6 feet to bUIldmg (exIsting) and ]2 feet to pavement (exlstmg), reduce the sIde (west) setback from 10 feet to three feet to pavement (exIst- Ing), reduce the side (east) setback from 10 feet to zero feet to a dumpster enclosure (exIstIng) and five feet to pavement (exIstIng), reduce the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to 1 5 feet to pavement (exlstmg) and to permIt dIrect access to a major artenal road (Gulf- to-Bay Boulevard), as a ComprehensIve Infill Redevelopment Pro- Ject under the provIsIons of SectIon 2-704, With a ComprehensIve Landscape Program under the proVIsions of Section 3.1202 PLANS REVIEWED: SIte plan submitted by Patnck T MagUIre, Esquue SITE INFORMATION: PROPERTY SIZE: 0283 acres, 12,348 square feet DIMENSIONS OF SITE: 126 feet WIde by 98 feet deep PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Proposed Use: Vacant bUllduig Restaurant PLAN CATEGORY: CG, Commercl(ll General Classification ZONING DISTRICT: C, Commercial Dlstnct Page 1 r ADJACENT LAND USES: North West East South Office Office Nightclub Automobile servIce statIOn, vacant CHARA€TER OF THE IMMEDIATE V1CINITY: NonresIdentIal uses dommate Gulfto Bay Boulevard ANALYSIS' The rectangular site IS 0283 acres located on the north sIde of Gulf to Bay Boulevard, approximately 100 feet east of BaYVIew Avenue The site IS developed With a 2,132 square-foot commercIal bUIldmg most recently used as an adult use The bUlldmg has a mam entrance on the southwest comer and an emergency eXIt on the north sIde The bUlldmg IS pamted gray WIth red tnm near the top of each wall It has been vacant for approximately three years Most recently, a Flexible. Development request to penmt a mghtclub, With a leductIOn In parkmg and landscape buffers, was demed by the Cornrnumty Development Board on March 20, 2001 (Case No FL 00- 08-33) The request IS to re-establIsh a restaurant at this locatIOn ThIs IS a ComprehenSIVe Infill Redevelopment Project due to the Code prohIbitIOn of dIrect access to a major artenal for a restaurant The applIcant could have otherwise applied for a restaurant under a FleXIble Standard Development apphcatIon request The site was ongmally developed as, a!1d IS stIll SUItable for, a restaurant, albeit With deViatIOns from Code prOVISIons The lot IS substandard With respect to bmldmg and parkmg lot setbacks, landscape buffers and parkmg area The site IS fully developed With the eXistIng bUlldmg and parkmg area The requested reductIon ill setbacks are to the eXlstmg bUlldmg <!lld edge of pavement The only exceptIon to thiS IS that eXlstmg pavement WIll be removed adjacent to Gulf to Bay Boulevard to create a 12-foot Wide landscape area The eXlstmg landscape buffer areas along the penmeter of the site WIll be Improved With landscapmg and the parkmg lot WIll be restnped to meet Code reqUirements Landscape Islands Will be created around three trees bemg preserved wlthm the parkIng lot It IS antIcIpated that the eXIstIng Sign WIll be refaced Any ComprehenSIve Sign Program submittal wIll tngger a review of all slgnage The applIcant IS proposmg to re-establrsh wmdows In the buildmg and it wIl1'be repall1ted to Improve the appearance of the bUIldIng The use of awnmgs over the wmdows could also enhance the appearance of the bUlldmg The final re- deSIgn of the bmldmg needs to be sublmtted to Staff pnor to Issuance of any pemllts/hcenses The proposed restaurant will have 18 parkmg spaces (8 44 spaces per 1,000 square feet) There IS no known user of the SIte The apphcant IS mtendmg to market the property to a "mom and pop" type restaurant busmess once the sIte plan IS approved, where the hours of operation would most lIkely accommodate the lunch and dll1ner crowds The operatIonal characteristics of most uses IS helpful m detennmmg parkmg need In absence of thiS, Staffbeheves that an altematlve approach IS to review the site and bUIldIng constramts and then hmIt the potential operator Many other commumtIes regulate restaurants based on fhe number of seats and employees on the largest work shIft or based on one space for each 150 square feet of gross floor area The applIcant anticipates a maximum of five employees on the largest work shift at thIS locatIOn In thIS case, based on a raho Page 2 I \ of three or four s~eats per parkmg space and one space for each two employees on the largest work ShIft, the 2,132 square feet buIldmg and 18 parkmg spaces can support 48 or 64 seats wIth the five employees Under the one space per each 150 square feet analYSIS, adequate parkmg IS avatlable On-street parkIng IS not avaIlable, SInce the property fronts on Gulf to Bay Boulevard and IS mld- block between BaYVlew Avenue and Meadow Lark Lane There are several mulh-stoned office bUlldmgs, reSidences and a hotel located near the proposed restaurant,. provldmg for walk-up customers Pnor to the Issuance of any pem11ts or hcenses for a partIcular restaurant, a busmess plan outhmng the operatIOn of the proposed restaurant user With the maximum number of employees on the largest ShIft, the hours of operatIon, aehvery hours, parkmg demand, ete needs to be submItted to the Plannmg Department, and be approved,_ to ensure adequate parkmg IS provIded All parkmg will be reqUired to meet Code reqUIrements, mc1udmg the handIcap space CODE ENFORCEMENT ANALYSIS: There are no outstandmg enforcement Issues assoctated WIth thiS site A. COMPLIANCE WITH MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL STANDARD IN THE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT (Section 2-701.1): STANDARD REQUIRED! EXISTING PROPOSED IN PERMITTED COMPLlANCE? FLOOR AREA 055 017 017 Yes RATIO (FAR) IMPERVIOUS 095 0724 0671 Yes SURFACE RATIO (ISR) Page 3 B. FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS IN THE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT (Section 2-704): STANDARD PERMITTEDI EXISTING PROPOSED IN REQUIRED COMPLIANCE? LOT AREA N/A 12,348 square 12,348 square Yes (minimum) feet feet LOT WIDTH N/A 126 feet 126 feet Yes (mmlmp.m) FRONT N/A 3 6 feet to 3 6 feet to Yes SETBACK bUlldmg, zero bUIldmg, 12 feet feet to pavement to pavement REAR N/A 1 5 feet to 1 5 feet to Yes SETBACK pavement pavement SIDE N/A West three feet West' three feet Yes SETBACK to pavement, to pavement, East zero feet to East zero feet to dumpster dumpster enclosure, five enclosure, five feet to p-avemerit feet to pavement HEIGHT N/A 14 feet 14 feet Yes maximum , PARKING Detennmed by 20 spaces (not I 8 spaces Yes SPACES the Commumty stnped wIth mmimum Development respect to sIze) DIrector based on the speCific use and/or ITE Manual st ana ards * * Based on a parkmg reqUIrements of between i5 parkmg spaces (seven spaces per 1,000 square feet) and 32 parkmg spaces (15 spaces per 1,000 square feet) for restaurants C. FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR COMPREHENSIVE IN FILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS IN THE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT (Se,ctlOn 2-704.B). 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development IS otherWise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. The lot 18 substandard wIth respect to bUIldmg and parkmg lot setbacks, landscape buffers and parkmg area The lot and eXlstmg development-pattern prevents full compliance with the reqUIred parkmg of 32 parkmg spaces (15 spaces pcr 1,000 square feet) and full Page 4 ~ landscapmg for the proposed restaurant use The wrdenmg of Gulf to Bay Boulevard, In conjunction with the construction of the BaysIde Bndge, took land area across the frontage of the lot, reducmg the abIlIty to meet Code prOVISIOns The last use m thIS bUIldmg was an adult use The proposed use IS for a restaurant wIth 18 parkmg spaces (844 spaces per 1,000 square feet) As a FlexIble Development request, a restaurant reqUIres between 15 parkmg spaces (seven spaces per 1,000 square feet) and 32 parkmg spaces (15 spaces per 1,000 sq uare feet) The reuse of the sIte and bUIldmg with any use would reqUIre some deViatiOn due to the locatIOn ofthe bUIldmg on the property 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive InfiIl Redevelopment Project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. The current value of the property IS $168,700, accordmg to the Pmellas County Property AppraIser The applicant has stated the appraIsed value IS $3e90,000 The apphcant expects to mvest approximately $10,000 to Improve the bUIldmg and SIte ThIS mcrease ]S not expected to reduce the value of abuttmg propertIes 3. The uses withm the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. The City of Cleanvater permIts restaurants m the CommercIal DIStnct as mlTIlITIUm standard uses 4. The use or mix of uses Within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project is compatible-with adjacent land uses. Adjacent uses are a mghtclublbar and an office bUlldmg NonresidentIal and commercial uses domInate the frontages of Gulf to Bay Boulevard The proposed restaurant use IS compatible WIth these adjacent uses Restaurants are common along Gulf to Bay Boulevard 5. SUitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses of mix of use!i within the Comprehensive InfiII Redevelopment Project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. ThIS IS a Comprehensive InfilI Redevelopment Project due to the Code prohibItIon of direct access to a major arterial for a restaurant The applIcant could have otherwise applIed for a restaurant under a FleXIble Standard Development applicatIOn request The SIte was oflgmally developed as, and IS still SUItable for, a restaurant, albeIt WIth deViatIOns from Code prOVIsIOns 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The site will l5e Improved WIth landscapmg and the parkmg lot WIll be restnped to meet Code req Ulrements The owner has mdIcated that the wmdows that were covered by the Page 5 / pnor user wIll be re-establIshed wlthm the bmldmg fayade and that the bmldmg wIll be repamted These Improvements will upgrade the sLlbJect property, WhICh could have a posItIve Impact on the surroundmg area 7. The deSign of the proposed Comprehensive [nfill Redevelopment Project creates a form and functIOn which enhances the c,ommumty character of the Immediate vicmity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. The character of the Immediate VIClruty IS nonres(dential Redevelopment of thiS parcel as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelo"pment Project for a restaurant wIl] be m keepm'g WIth thiS character 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justIfied by the benefits to commuDlty character and the Immediat~ vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. The lot IS substandard WIth respect to bUlldmg and parkmg lot setbacks, landscape buffers and parkmg area As part of a Comprehensl ve lnfill Redevelopment ProJ ect due to access restnctlOn, the request mcludes a reduction [11 setbacks and parkmg to perrint a restaurant on a fully developed site The reductIOn III setbacks requested are to the eXIstmg bUlldmg and edge of pavement A 12-foot Wide landscape area WIll be proVided along Glllfto Bay Boulevard, the eXistIng landscape buffer areas along the penmeter of the SIte Will be Improved and landscape Islands WIll be created The reduction m parkmg IS wlthm the range accepted as a FleXible Standard Development applicatIOn (7-15 spaces per 1,000 square feet gross floor area) The SIte IS constramed m size ,!nd the maximum number of parkmg spaces phYSically possible (18) IS currently proVided Staff beheves the potentIal operator should be lImited Pnor to the Issuance of any penmts or hcenses for a partIcular restaurant, a busmess plan outlImng the operatIon of the proposed restaurant user WIth the m~XlmUlJl number of employees on the largest Shift, the hours of operatIOn, delIvery hours, parkmg demand, etc needs to be subtl1ltted to the Planmng Department for approval to ensure adequate parkmg IS proVided 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate Vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parkmg in the Immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for developm~nt. The applicant has Indicated that the mtended restaurant WIll be a "mom and pop" type of restaurant, rather than a natIOnal cham restaurant Hours of operatIon WIll need to be consistent WIth thIS "mom and pop" character, where the hours most hkely would accommodate the lunch and dmner crowds, and potentially breakfast hours The restaurant IS not expected to be open after 9 pm The applIcant antiCipates a maxImum offive employees on the largest work shift On-street parkmg IS not aVailable. There are several multi-stoned office bUIldmgs, reSIdences and a hotel located near the proposed restaurant, provIdmg for walk-lip customers Shared parkmg With the abuttmg rughtclublbar to the east IS not possIble, as It has substandard parkmg for Its use Pnor to Page 6 the Issuance of a CertIficate of Occupancy, all parkmg mcludmg the handIcap space must meet City standards. D. GENERAL APPLICABILITY (Section 3-913): Conditions which are imposed by the Community Development Coordinator and the Community Development Board pursuant to a Level One ot a Level Two Approval shall ensure that: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density, and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The surroundmg area IS charactenzed by a mix of older and more modem commercial and office bmldmgs frontmg on Gulf to Bay Boulevard The site IS developed With a modest bmldmg that IS nonconformmg to front (south) and Side (east) setbacks The eXlstmg parkIng lot IS nonconformmg With respect to front (south), Side (east and west) and rear (north) setbacks Many nonresidentIal propertIes wlthm close proXImity are also nonconfomung to setbacks for bUIJdmgs and pavement 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or sigmficantly impair the value thereof. The bUIldmg has been vacant for a few years The applIcant ]S propo,smg to re-estabhsh wmdows m the bUlldmg and rep~mt It, WhICh WIll hopefully pOSItIvely enhance It The SIte WIll be, enhanced With landscapmg and ex tenor bmldmg,changes, which WIll miprove the SIte's appearance from Guffto Bay Boulevard and from adjacent propertIes 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working III the neighborhood of the proposed use. The Site was ongmally developed as a rest~urant and the proposal 15 for ltS reuse as a restaurant It should not affect the health or safety of persons resIdmg or workmg 111 the neIghborhood 4. The proposed development is deslgnl;'d to minimize traffic congestion. TIllS IS a ComprehensIve Infill Redevelopment Project due to the Code prohibItIon of dIrect access to a major artenal for a restaurant The slte IS located on the north Side of Gulf to Bay Boulevard, a major arterial The applicant could have otherwise applIed for a restaurant under a FleXible Standard Development applIcatIOn request The SIte was ongmally developed as, and IS stIll sUItable for, a restaurant, albeIt WIth deVIatIOns from Code prOVISIOns On-street parkmg 15 not available, but the SIte may attract pedestnan- onented customers from surroqndmg offices and neighborhoods Page 7 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicmity of the parcel proposed for development. The character of the Immediate VICInIty IS nonresIdentIal Redevelopment of this parcel as a ComprehenSIve Infill Redevelopment Project for a restaurant will be m keepmg with this character The appearance of the property IS expected to be enhanced through landscape and bUlldmg Improvements 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. The hours of operatIon, although unknown, will need to be outlmed m a busmess plan pnor to the Issuance of any penmtsflicenses They wIll need to commensurate With the parkmg limItatIOns Visually, the site WIll be Improved With enhanced landscapmg and bulldmg upgrades SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The applicatIOn and supportmg matenals were reVIewed by the Development Review Committee on March 14, 2002. The Planrung Department recommends APPROVAL of the FleXIble Development applIcatIOn to reduce the reqUired number of parkmg spaces from 15 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area (32 spaces) to 844 spaces per 1,000 sqUaFe feet of gross floor area (18 spaces), reduce the front (south) setback from 25 feet to 3 6 feet to bUlldmg (exlstmg) and 12 feet to pavement (exIstmg), red uce the SIde (west) setback from 10 feet to three feet to pavement (exIstmg), reduce the Side (east) setback from 10 feet to zero feet to a dumpster enclosure (exIstmg) and five feet to pavement (exlstmg), reduce the rear (north) setback fTom 20 feet to 1 's feet to pavement (exlstmg) and to permit direct access to a major artenal road (Gulf~to- Bay Boulevard), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the prOVIsions of SectIon 2~ 704, With a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the proVISions of SectIOn 3-1202, for the SIte at 3066 Gulfto Bay Boulevard, WIth the followmg bases and condItIons Bases for Approval 1 The proposal complies WIth the FleXible Development cntena as a Comprehensive IniiIl Redevelopment Project per SectIon 2-704 B 2 The proposal complies WIth the FleXIble Development cntena as a ComprehenSIve Landscape Pro gram under the prOVIsIons of S ectJ on 3-1202 G 3 The proposal IS m complIance With other standards m the Code mcludmg the General Apphcabillty Cntena per SectIOn 3-913 4 The development IS compatIble WIth the surroundmg area and WIll enhance other redevelopment efforts CondItIOns 1 That a busmess plijIl outhnmg the operatIOn of the proposed restaurant user WIth the maXImum number of employees on the largest shift, the hours of operatIOn, delivery hours, parkmg demand, ete be submItted to the Plannmg Department and be approved, pnor to Issuance of any permIts or hcenses, Page 8 (~ I 2 That any change m the type of restaurant be evaluated for comphmentary operatlOnal charactensttc and parkmg demand, and may reqUIre approval by the Commumty Development Board, 3 That the bmldmg appearance be unproved wIth the use of wmdows, pamt and awmngs, acceptable to the Plannmg Department, 4 That any upgrade to a dumpster larger than two yards wIll reqUlre a new pad and enclosure, and 5 That all sIte and extenor bUlldmg Improvements be made to the satIsfaytJon of staffl ~nor to the Issuance of any hcenses or CertIficate of Occupancy Prepared by Plannmg Department Staff ATTACHMENTS Aenal Photograph of Site and VIcmlty LocatIOn Map Future Land Use Map Zonmg Atlas Map ApphcatIon .5 lP/allllmg DepartmemlC D B\FI~, lPelldmg cOles \RcVI<!wcd {llId PelldmgI G'!/f II} Bay 3006 Tl/fIJlh re$tnw mitlGlIlf 10 Bay 3006 Slaff Report 1m restmIN11l1 doc Page 9 ~~,\- \ 143 155 142 157 55 ~ ~ 129 _ - 1DIJ::~117 ~ ~ 141 158 ~". 118 ""i27 131 140 159 '" c 1 10.5 119 126 132 139 160 0 0 ~w~ 104 120 c 0... L(;I 125 133 138 lq1 " ~ -<l';:: 103' 121 " 0 ~~ 124 134 137 162 '" '" 10.2 122 12J 163 " 135 136 L------- 69 68 67 66 65 64 63 62 61 60 59 Ret e~ tlO~ Aceo ~C !;',..>i'7~;t0\i~, ~'.fWli!!1Pj'i\l'1ll';!W'JjI)!"'" ~ ~ ~r$' .:.)~ /'Y~ <\ 0. '0/- <\ J? ~ri ~ g: '" '" '" "l ~Z50-213 S R 60 ~ lZ ~ 101(/1 ~ 202 "'l .S," ~ ~Q -;;all. ~~ ~ ,-(.., I' / ,.0/. ~ -<::: 105,-.., 20.6 ''l V-.", / ~ ''1-''l ,Of:, /~ I"'Y,~' ~-\ ~ 10.70:': 20.8 ~ I"'Y /5cJ ..~ ,0'0 .<1 .;; Vc; -"7 / ~ /-:0 109( ~ 210. :J! Ij,; --<"'\.~ X" 111- 212- :f I'~ /t. Y ..-><:: W,O:': 214 ~ V~~"'" ,0 /..,'./" ,........ :.i 1"/ ~I% %"'" ~~ 117 216 C> VI:> )..,-/ <I- ./. ...... ~ 1'/ ;S'" V( ",~"0b 119;;::: 218 ~ 1:;''b;:(I'S< /..., 12o....L. 220 '" -l72q ",,"J (~ ..':..,. .......!J. ~ i ' ~ ROGEW ~m Eq ~ IJ ~ ~ 29 J8 17 120. 1":-_ - -:;ll iAD_!.3 ~ I ~ 32Q/I\~V 123, 222 225 125 226 e 2~!}:1 16 122 I-- - / ~ * E.!-V ~ 224 227 127 228 ~ QJ 15 7124 127 - / 129 230 l ~ ~ BL - 226 ~?Q ","*"I ~,_ o OJ !; o ..' d ~ .s to ~ " z ~ <( '" o is <( u o I- ::l :$ z i3 z ':Y (/} Q) I ~ ~ B C\.rnI1EW 1<:\ l- - L W VA A V E ::t:. 225 ~ ~ w ] ~ n:: g: <( Vl ~~ '" ..J T '" -'> ~ '" '" 227 C,LE RWA ER ~ 30 'L )m ~~ 40 - '" "''' - I:C 0 C .... - ~ ~ t ]~i~~iI, f g :'0 <( ~ @ @, ~ 30& Cl ..Ii"""" u;J " 0> 111 ~BAY VIEW ~ ~ ~ gC1TY o",,~,"'J ? ~ jq\ ., ;:::.- \j"~\l, SOB $ 509~~~ ~~#M -1dn~OF~ #' <;,0 611BA Y\ --Ald\ &0.3 "'" Voc R!W 0 \ VIEW - 9144-57 &0 40 '9' o if) 0:: ~ ::g < ~ @ ""f a '" o '" ;; ~ '" '" '" '" '" ~ 2; '" '" '" -r ~ .JiJ! r;.A ~ - '" ----, 0:" ~ @ r '" , ,~ r , L~fD <( '" CD KAPOK '" ~ 0 '" " ~ " ..., " < ~,):' .... t.- t.- .... t.- t.- - AVENUE " 407 TR AVE L l-- SUB TRAILER C, ~ r---' ~ PARK ~"qo (co:; ';'i ~ 00., 0.,0., '" 50g '" 0 .!4~ '" 0 0 '" I"' "- '" '" '"'''' '" N S R 0 0 60 <0 " GULF o " ~ 417 ~;6 2::: ~ t ~ ~ ~ N gg gg:iS gg g :> of, >- N ~ :g 9-43 ~ )":10 \ 00 f=.~;~; := 2 ~ 60 '" '" o ~~ -< 1 5 '" '" CAROLINA "jO o C\l I 0),,20 ,,03 H6 "~ ~ 01 L 6 ~ ~ '" S o ;If"_:~ \ '" !lJ1I J!l 0 ~c:~~I\~~~ TO BAY ~ '" '"' 1 HP ~ ff CV~ \ V .-.\. t:Q~ gl-''''" rill .,.e' 'lo~"'i': 23 co S. "" c' '" '" Q ", '" ~ 'iG '" o _N ~ -> FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT REQUEST OWNER Phuoc Thanh Nguyen CASE FL 02-02-04 SITE: 3006 Gulf to Bay Boulevard I PROPERTY SIZE (ACRES) o 28 PIN 16/29/16/05292/008/0080 ATLAS 292A PAGE " Wells, Wayne From Sent. To. Cc Parry, Mark Thursday, March 14, 2002 1 12 PM 'pmagUlre@tampabay rr com', 'nesadmln@mlndspnng com' Bertels, Paul, Carner, AI, Debbie Richter, Donald Melone, Joseph Colbert, leshe Dougal/- Sides, Lisa Fierce, Michael QUillen, Mike Gust. Randy Hinder, Rick Albee, Roberta Gluskl, Tam Glenn, Wells, Wayne Case FL 02-02-04 . 3006 Gulf-ta-Bay Boulevard Subject. Case: FL 02-02-04 - 3006, Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard Apphcant/Owner: Thanh Phuoc Nguyen Representative: Mr Patnck T MagUire, Esq LocatIOn. 028 acres located on the north Side of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard, approximately 42 feet west of Meadow Lark Lane Atlas Page 292A Zonmg: C, Commercial Dlstnct Request: Flexible Development approval to reduce the reqUired number ofparkmg spaces from]5 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area (32 spaces) to 8 5 spaces per I ,DOg square feet of gross floor area (] 8 spaces), reduce the front (south) setback from 25 feet to 3 6 feet to bUildmg and] 2 feet to pavement, reduce the side (west) setback from 10 feet to three feet to pa vement, reduce the SIde (east) setback from 10 feet to zero feet to a dumpster enclosure and five feet to pavement, reduce the rear (nprth) setback from 20 feet to I 5 feet to pavement and to permIt duect access to a major artenal road (Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard), as a ComprehenslVe lnfill Redevelopment ProJ ect under the proVISIOns of Section 2-704 Wlth ComprehenSive Landscape Program under the provIsIOns of SectIOn 3-] 202 Propos~d Use. A restaurant Wlthm an eXlstmg one-story 2,] 32 square foot masonry block bUlldmg, With access onto Gulf to Bay Boulevard Presenter. Wayne Wells, SeDlor Planner Attendees mcluded. Oty Staft: Mark Parry, Mlke Gust, Tom Glenn, Rick Albee, Don Melone, Lisa Fierce, Elliott Shoberg and Joe Colbert, Wayne Wells Applicant. Mr Patrick T MagUire, Thanh Phuoc Nguyen The DRC reVIewed these applications wIth the followmg comments: 1. Parks and RecreatIOn a) No Comment~ 2. Stormwater. a) No Comments 3 Traffic ene:meenn2: a) All parkmg, mcludmg handicap per City Standards' pnor to the Issuance of a Certlficate of Occupancy 4. General ene:meenne:: a) Back flow preventor deVice to be mstalled pnor to Issuance of any penmts 5. 1 , Planum!!' a) The site data table on Sheet C3 I of the site plan must be amended as follows · The eXistIng and proposed bUlldmg coverage should be 1727%, not 1743%, · The requIred FAR IS 0 55, not 0 40, · It appears t~at eXlstmg paved vehIcular use area IS beIng removed to proVide more overall open space and mtenor landscapmg However, the prOVided paved vehicular use area IS greater than the eXIstmg paved vehicular use area Please check your calculatIOns and revise accordIngly (mcludmg proposed paved vehIcular use area If necessary), · The eXlstmg Impervlou,s surface and open space square footage and percentage of the gross Site do not add up to the gross site area (when addmg appropnate numbers) (see also above comment), Confirm the eXlstmg a_nd proposed parlang lot mtenor landscapIng square footage and percentage of the vehIcular use area calculatIOns, The reqll1red number of par lung spaces IS 32 spaces, and The parkmg calculatIOns should be based on 18 spaces bemg proVided, whIch produces a parkmg ratIO used of 8 823 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area, b) The site plan must be c1anfied as to whether the eXistIng asphalt or turf block IS bemg removed from the locatIons adjacent to the to-Inch, I3-mch and lS-mch oak trees, which are not beIng shown or calculated as parkmg spaces If these areaS are to become landscaped areas, please mdlcate that curbIng or other measures acceptable to Code to ens1JTe non-encroachment by vehicles mto these areas, c) If pavement (asphalt or turf block) IS bemg removed from these areas, ensure that the site data reflects such, d) Dunl?llSlOn ~he Wldth of the landscape buffer area on the west and east SIdes of the SIte c) All ~Ignage must be subtnltted pnor to CDB reVIew, t) ParkIng study to be provided poor to CDB reView, g) Provlde sIte mformatlOn Inc1udmg number of employees, delivery tImes, etc h) ProVIde blJIldmg elevations pnor to COB reView, I) All of the above (a - I) must be done poor to the CDB reVlew 6 Solid waste: a) Apphcant WllI comnut to a mamtammg the eXistIng two yard dumpster - Solid Waste agrees Should the dumpster be upgraded to a larger dumpster then a new enclosure and pad WlU be requued 7. Land resource: a) Should a new dumpster pad be mstalled tlie eXlstmg turf block Will need to be removed by hand 8. Fire' a) No Comments 9 Landscapml!. a) No comments . . . NOTES: ,. ReVised SIte plans to be resubtnltted to Staff by March 19, 2002 . CDB date Apn116, 2002 . Fax comments to Patnck Maguue at 727-446-3741 or emaIi to pmal?lIIre@tamoabav IT com <mallto pmagulre@tamoabay rr com>, emaII to Housh Ghovaee at nesadmm@mmdspnng com <m3lHo nesadmm(@mmdsprmg com> 2 ~ ..- DRAFT CONDITIONS OF DEVELOPMENT ORDER .. That all parkmg spaces, mcludmg handicap, meet all City Standards pnor to the Issuance of a CertIficate of Occupancy, .. Should a new dumpster pad be mstalled the eXlstmg turf block WIll need to be removed by hand, .. ApplIcant will commit to a mamtalTIlTIg the eXlstmg two yard dumpster - Solid Waste agrees Should the dumpster be upgraded to a larger dumpster then a new enclosure and pad will be reqUired 3 Apr-Ol-02 12 38 From-RICHARr~ "ILKEY ATTYS 127-446.3741 - T-462 P 01 F-305 . DA IE SENT: 4/1/2002 TIME SENT: 11.30 AM PATRICK T MAGUIRE Attorney at Law 1253 Park Street Clearwater, FL 33756 (727) 442-3838 Fax (727) 446-3741 FAX lNFORMA nON SHEET TO. Wayne Wells FROM. Patrick T. Maguire, Esq. REFERENCE: Phuoc Thanh Nguyen Application No FL 02-02-04 - 3006 Gulf to Bay NO. PAGES:_7_ (INCLUDING COVER) FAXED TO' 562-4576 PLEASE NOTE _ WILL FOLLOW IN MAIL _X_ WIT..L NOT FOLLOW IN :MAIL _FOR YOUR REVIEW & COMMENTS _PLEASE SIGN AND RETURN _FOR YOUR INFORMATION ~PER YOUR REQUEST PLEASE TELEPHONE ME UPON RECEIVING PATRICK T. MAGUIRE Attorney at Law CertIfied CircUit Court Mediator 1253 Park Street Clearwater, Flonda 33756 February 25,2002 Telephone (727) 442-3838 Fax (727) 446-3741 Wayne Wells Clearwater Plannmg Dept. POBox 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 Re' Case No FL 02-02-04,3006 Gulf to Bay Blvd Dear Mr. Wells. In accordance With your request of February 22nd, 2002, I submit the followmg I Completed application for Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project with ongmal signatures. 2. There are no proposed changes to the exterior of the budding, other than pamt and cosmettc enhancement.. 3 Slgnage wdl remam with only the message or Sign face bemg changed for the new busmess 4 Parkmg is mamtained at the level of eighteen spaces. After diSCUSSIOns With staff, it appears that retainIng the oak trees wlthm the corridor is preferable to their removal for purposes of additIonal parkmg Based on the desirability of contmumg to maintain the trees that are on Site, the parkmg stIll falls within the parameters for fleXible development Thank you for your cooperation and assistance m thiS matter PTM Jr Maguue i:; If~F~~ ~:U~~2llTIll ! - .~. _______J I \ I:L~t" ~~~-Di.... 'I l,i;-tH SVCS f 4 ""; .~tHh'~q -1 '\ . ..!- .~ofI%~???., ,~'~~t IS l'J ill- 'fit (f;:-t> "}i ___ \ 0'" )iitra.lt:-~~.Jfttt""r.~..~~ )'~~AY~~ I f -.(i;~~: ~;-;-, "r(,,-,,-,,. \ 1 '''r'-~I'' ",,-, 1 .....'j....... ~ I/~ \1i,1~ U 'l-1 'W-i/I=r'-:'I.~_,- <;'"",J";) ~r-~.:~ 7:~---.'- J!~C, ':.>.'l I ""':J~ -~~= - //~ -:!- ') q: ,.......-...~~........-----.. .c.iHt.,.\-7} ""lr,,=--~1p' \"~' -_' ' !'P3~..nv---fl <;, '<" .., ~''f'i~~~ ~ f'- ,0' <<; -A. i .' ~'-U).I ""_ r....)]r7;,.1. CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNI~G DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748" CLFARWATER, FWRlDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUlWING, 100 SOUTI-f MYRTLE AVENUE, Cl F..ARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (127) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 LONG RANGE PlANNING DEVELOPMENT REVlr:W Apnl 26, 2002 Mr Patnck T MagUire, EsqUire 1253 Park Street Clearwater, FL 33756 FILE COpy RE Development Order regardmg Case FL 02-02-04 - 3006 Gulf to Bay Boulevard Dear Mr MagUIre ThI.s letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to SectIOn 4-206D 6 of the Commumty Development Code On Apnl 16, 2002, the Commumty Development Board reviewed your applIcatIOn to reduce the reqUIred number of parkmg spaces from 15 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area (32 spaces) to 844 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area (18 spaces), reduce the front (south) setback from 25 feet to 3 6 feet to bUIldmg (exlstmg) and 12 feet to pavement (exIstmg), leduce the SIde (west) setback from 10 feet to three feet to pavement (existIng), reduce the SIde (east) setback from 10 feet to zero feet to a dumpster enclosure (exIstmg) and five feet to pavement (exIstmg), reduce the rear (north) setback from 20 fe'et to 1 5 feet to pavement (exIstmg) and to permit dIrect access to a major artenal road (Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard), as a Comprehensive InfiIl Redevelopment ProJect, under the provISIOns of SectIOn 2- 704 wlth a ComprehensIve Landscape Program under the provlSlons of SectiOn 3-1202 The proposal IS for a restaurant wIthm an eXlstmg one.story, 2,132 square-foot masonry block bUIldmg, With access onto Gulf to Bay Boulevard Based on the applicatIOn and the staff recommendatIOn, the Commumty Development Board APPROVED the applIcatIon With the follOWing bases and conditIOns Bases for Approval 1 The proposal complIes With the FleXIble Development cntend as a ComprehenSive Infill Reqevelopment Project per SectIOn 2-704 B 2 The proposal complies WIth the FleXible Development cntena as a Comprehenslve Landscape Program under the prOVISions of SectIOn 3-1202 G 3 The proposal IS In complIance WIth other standards m the Code Includmg the General Apphc'l,blhty Cntena per SectIOn 3-913 4 The development IS compatible WIth the surroundmg area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts BRlAN J AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIOl\ f R Eo HART, VICE MAYOR COMMISSIONFR WHITNCY GRAY, COMMlSSIOr-FR HoYT HAMiI.TON, COMMISSIONIoR @l 8111 JONSON, COMMI'iSIONER "EQUAL EMPIOYM[Nf AJ\D AFFIRMAlfV[ ACTION EMPLOYER" . c Apnl 26, 2002 Magmre - Page 2 CondItIOns of Approval 1 That a busmess plan outlImng the opoeratIOI1 of the J5roposed restaurant user with the maximum numb'or of employees on the largest shift, the hours of operatIon, delivery hours, parkIng demand, etc be submItted to the Planmng Department and be approved, pnor to Issuance of any permits or hcenses, 2 That any change m the type of restaurant be evaluated for complImentary operatJOnal charactenstlc and parkmg demand, and may reqUIre approval by the Cominumty Development Board, 3 That the bUIldIng appearance be Improved WIth the use of wmdows, pamt and awmngs, acceptable to the PlannIng Department, 4 That any upgrade to a dumpster larger than two yards wIll reqUIre a new pad and enclosure, and any upgrade to the dumpster IS to be done WIthout removIng any parkmg spaces, and 5 That an site and extenor bmldmg Improvements be made to the satIsfactlOn of staff, pnor to the Issuance of any hcenses or Cerhficate of Occupancy Pursuant to Sechon 4-407, an applIcatIOn for a bUlldmg penmt shall be made wlthm one year of FleXIble Development approval (Apnl 16, 2003) All reqUlrcd certIficates of occupancy shall be obtamed wIthm one year of the date of Issuance of the bUIldmg permIt TIme frames do not change With successive owners The Commumty Development Board may grant an extensIon of hme for a penod not to exceed one year and only wIthm the ongmal penoct ofvahdlty Please be aware that the Issuance of this Development Order does not relIeve you of the necessity to obtam aity bUIldmg pentllts or pay any Impact fees that may be reqUired In order to facIlitate the Issuance of any permit or lIcense affected by thiS approval, please bnng a copy of thIS letter WIth you when applymg for any permits or licenses that reqll1re thIS pnor development approval In addItIOn, please be aware that an appeal of a Level Two approval (FlexIble Deve19pment) may be I111hated by a property owner abuttmg the property which IS the subject of the approval wIthm 14 days of the date of the CDB deCISIon TIfe filmg of an appltcatJOn/fiotlce of appeal shall stay tlle effect of the deCISion pendlllg the final detennmatlOn of the case The appeal penod for your case will expire on Apnl 30,2002 If you have any questIons, please do not heSitate to call Wayne M Wells, AlCP, Semor Planner, at 727-562-4504 Cc Mr Phuoc Thanh Nguyen, property owner S lPlannmg DeparlmellllC D BIF/1!), 1/!lIwcllve 01 Flllls!Jed AppllcallOlIslGulf1O Bay 3006 11wIIII res/alll alii - App'ovedlGll1f 10 Bay 3006 Developlllenl Order doc Fr L~ Cofj "- . FAX TRANSMI1TAL MEMORANDUM Tel Cyndl Tarapanl, Planmn;J DIrector From: Leslie K Dougall-Sides, Assl City Attomey Fax: 4865 Pages: 9 Re: P Thanh Nguyen v City Date: 1/3012004 8 03~CV-2485- T-30MSS o Urgent x For Review o prease Comment 0 Please Reply o Please Recycle Gl Comments: Attached for your Infcrmatl0f11S a copy of the Summons and \lenfied Complaint for the above-referenced case Confidentiality NDtice The InformatIOn contained in this facsimile message IS privileged and confidential. Intended for the use of the addressee above If you are neither the Intended reCipIent nor the employee or agent responsible for delivering thiS message to the intended reCIpIent, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copYing, dlstnbu'bon or the takmg of action In reliance on the contents of thiS telecop\ed informatlon IS strictly prohibited If you have received thiS telecopy In error, please notIfy counsel above ImmedIately by te-Iephone to arrange for return of the onglnal documents to the counsel named above. t . d t201:>29SL2L F:au..Jo~~l:l l=;~1:J E!'82:0t 1>0 DE: uer J . ot:"AO 440 (ItLv 10/9 1) ~llmLtlPl1S ILL 1 CtVIl AO"Qn UNITED STATES DISTRlCT COURT r-1~ddle Du;tnct of Flonoa P Thanh Nguyen and T. Klm-Trl.1c Nguyen, hlS r",ife SUiVfMONS IN A CIV1L CASE v C~Ly of Cled!~ater, a Florlda ITlU1HClpal corporatlon CASE.. <' :) OJ L~ I ,/..- ,)c/, Y.:) -/~ '- ?(' / J 1S'.:.; ,..'2 15'1-- TO lNnme ~l1d odllr~s of Def.~do u) '!;HI ~,( ~.. ---, (/-~~:-~ ......- C~ty of Clea0Nater clo Brlan Aungst, Sc., Mayor Offlce of the Mayor Clearwater Clty Hall, 3rd Floor 112 S. 09~eola Ave CleaD~Rter, Fl 33156 \ OU ARE HEREBY SUMMONE D and reiJlllred to St:fve upon PLAlNTfRF'S ATTORNEY (non" ""U ,,~,Irm) Tbomas C Little, Esquue 2123 N.E, C03shmar Road, SUlte A Clean,ater, Fl 33765 <In answer to ,he wmp lain! whIch l~, herew Jtll served upon you with I n t"1:Jr>n t"}' (7.0) days after $crv Ie e of tl\lS ~llmrnOJ1S UpGI\ YOll, cxclml\'e nfthe day of serv'ce If YQu fall to do so, Judgment by default w111 be< taken agalnst YOll for the re II d demanded Tn the ccmp 1a.1 nt You must al <;0 fj Ie Jour ansWel' WI tl11he Clerk of th 10, C':,u Ii WI tin n ,\ rensof'able perl od of t I me aitel service , , , , , , ' CLE"'-'< 1'1 ( ;et / ) DATf :;3,' DCPt)T\ C,-f::J{ r, 2 d t20trC'9SL2L haU.JO"J,~l:l R":l.l:) eS2.0t toO 08 uer THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 1 A!vlPA DIVISION P THANH NGUYEN ana T KIM-TRUe NGUYEN, his wife, PlolnMfs. vs Case NO CITY OF CLEARWATER, 0 Flonda Ilunlclpol corpora lion, Deferdant I VERIFIED COMPLAINT P10lll11ffs P THANH NGUYEN and T KIM-TRue ~,IGUYEN, his wife, sue the Defendant, the CITY OF CLEARWATER, ana allege as follows, GENERAL ALLEGATIONS Plolntrtfs ore reSidents of Plnellos County, Florida 2 Defe nda n t I') a flor:da m un Icrpai C:)1 para tio n 3 Plornflffs are the Q'v\.ne'-s Gf real propert; In Plnellas Count,y, Florida, more parhcularly described os 3006 Gulf to Say Boulevard, Clearwater. FlortC1a (hel eln "the real proiJerty" 4 PIOinrltfs acqulreo ~Gld real propei1y b'l purchase of 0 fee Slmp:e Interest on 01 obout Dec.ember 9, ] 988 E"d 120-lr29S1,2L. ~au..lO":l.~~ h~tJ i?S2:0I .po DE: wee ! '3 DUring the Ploln tiffs' ownership ot said real property, Plolntlffs hod leased the sUbJeci reul properlY to various tenants, which rwd beer and wine licenses fOI their re<;pecllve businesses located 01 the subject real property COUNT I 6 This IS 0 cau.se Qf aellon kY damages III excess of $75,000 00 7 PlainTiffs reallege paragraphs 2 ihrough 6 hereinabove and reIncorporate them herein 8 0 n Augus r ), 1989, PIOln llffs lea<:;ed the sUbject real property to J BM Entertolnnlent cf Countryside, tne , which used the ,:Jrerrlses rer a "Dance Club- Resro.Jrant" 9 JBM fni.~rtal'lmenr or CountrysIde Ine held on occupational :ICEnse for "nlghtclu_b" use and us(~d ihe subject 1801 prooerry cs a nightclub with 0 2~COP Beer ond Wine License :fG67-04460 10 JBM En tedolnment of Cou ntrysld e, Inc trar~sfe((ecJ ils I nterest and Itq_,or license to WGW Enterrainrnenr, Inc on or cbout November of 1990 11 WG W Ente>;toln(llent, Inc com;:>leted rl1S? terrns OT Its lease and I ,)1 . ' '__'- \'1t...1' . vacate>d th e su bject real pro perty 12 Plaln~lff;" u;Jon discovery Ihot WGW Enledolnmenr Ine 'NOS r,)t renewing lis lease, placed a lL~or Rent" sign on ~he premises and began to show 11 Ie plOperly for ren. as 0 nightclub 2 .pod I20172SSL2L haU.JD1.~l:1 "~lJ eS2:01 .po DC uer " 13 Subsequent to tho r tlrne. Plornttffs hove shown Tne subjec: I reol property TO several prospecilve tenants, but those tenOnTs were told by , ',-> -- "C~~~ agents/employees of the Clty of Clearwater that the subject real property IS nor '\ ." " available for use os a nightclub or restaurant X 14 Defendant knew or should have known Thot an occupational lIcense for a Illgh1club was the only deSignation Issued for the subJed real property since] 990, and the use of the sublect real property by Plalnhff's P'lor fena~lt was conhIluous r- 15 Defendant has applied Its land Development Code, which wos )( ef1echve January 1, 2000, and was enacted subsequent to the established use of the real property, 10 Plolntlff's subject redl property ~o as to prevent PlaintiFf I s use of the subject real proper1y for ~ny viable eC0nOm\C use 16 Defendant's application of Its land Development Code to PlaIntiff's subject real property ana denial of February 4, 2000 occupational license 10 prevent lis use as a nightclub or restourol1t, IS arbl ~rary, CapriCIOUS, ard wltnout remonoble 005IS 17 As a dlred result of the Defendant's wrongful application of the Land Development Code 10 PlalOtlffs' subject real property, Defenoant has violated Plaintiffs' clvli rlghrs and has cauo;ed damage to P10lnhffs under 42 1I S C Section 1983 by depriVing Plamtlffs ot the economically vloble use of lhell real properly 3 S'd F\au"'O';l.~l:J F\';l.lJ 8'62:01 VO DE u~r 120v29SL2L '.1 18 PlolnTlffs have retained the undersigned law firm and agreed to poy reosonabl<; attorney's fees whiCh snould be awo~deq under 42 U S C. SecT\or 1988 WHEREFORE, PI:J\nhffs Demond Judgment against Defendant for damages, costs 0 f this actiOI"', I eo ~onable attorn ey's fees, end for suc'i o1h er and ~urther relief os lhe Court deems appropriate COUNT II 19 This IS a COU$e of action for damages In excess of $ 7 5,ODO 00 20 Plolntlff<: reallege paragraphs 2 rhrcugh ,oS hereinabove, and Incorporate them herein 21 Plaintiffs are residenfs of Plnellas County, Florida 2:2 Defendant IS a ,=Iondo rr,unlc:pol cOlporatlon 23 PI CI n tiffs ore "h e owners 0 f real propel IV :n Plne!los Cau n ty. {: lorlcla, 'llore porllculorly <;J8scrrbed as 3006 GulT to Boy Boulevard, Clealwater, Flondc (flereln "the 1801 property" 2.<1 piolllilffs acqullecl said real prooerry by pUI"chase or 0 lee simple Intel est on or about, December 9, 1988 25 DUltng rile Plaintiffs' ownership of SOld real property, Plaintiffs had leosed ~he su bJed real propel t I 10 van ous te non ts, w hie h h ad bee r of1d w'ne Ilcen;;es ror their respective busln esses loccted at n-,e 5UCJ8C t I eol property ( 26 T;llS IS a cause of celion lor damages in excess of $75,00000 ) 4 S"d I201>299L2L h03U..JO'+'+l:I h'+IJ ~62:01 vO DE:: ue-c , (27 Plolrtlffs reallege paragraphs 2 tnrough 6 hereinabove and reincorporate them here.n) 28 On August 1 1989, Plaintiffs leased the subject reai proper ry t::J J BM Entertainment of Countlyslde, Inc , which used lhe premises for a "Dance Club- Res taul OF! t" 29 J8M Entertainment of Countryside, Inc. held an CCCuJ:"lotlonal license for "niqhtclub" use and used the subject real property as a rlghlclub with a 2-COP Beer and Wille License #062-04460 30 JBM Entertainment of Countryside, Inr:: transferred lis Interes~ and liquor jlcense to WGW Entertolnment, Inc on or about November of 1990 31 WGW Entertolnrnent, lnc completed the terms of lie lease cmd vacoted the suoject reol properiy 32 Plotntlffs, upon discovery thot WG'vV Enierlolnment, lnc was not renewing lis lease plac.ed a "For Rent" sign on the premises and began 10 SflOW Tr,e property for rent os G nighTclub 33 Subsequen~ to thot time, Plaintiffs have sl'ovvn tr,e subject reol property to 58 "el 01 Pi ospectlve lenants, bu1 rhose tenDnts we~e laid QY agents/employees of the City of Clearwater that the subject real property IS not Qvailoble for use 85 a nlghklub or restaurant 34 Oefe n j on t knew or 5 houl cI have known trlc 1 an OCCLJ po 110110 I license for 0 nlghtc!ub Wl;lS ille only deSignation Issuerl for the ~ubJecJ reai 5 L."d t201029SL.2L. l;aU.JD':l.':l.l:;l 1=.'.l1:J eOE:Ol vO DC wee property SI1ce 1990, and the use of the subject real properly by Plain tiff's prior tenonr wc~ conTinuous 35 Defendant has applied Its Land Deve!opment CQde, which was effective January 1. 2000 and was enacted subsequent to the established U:8 at the recl property to plOW! tiff';"; subject Ie 01 property so os to prevent Plol n till' $ use of the subject real prq:erty for any Viable eccnomlc use 36 Deferdant's application of its land Development Code to Plolntllfs' real property and denla! of Feorvary 4, 2000 occupctlona! license to prevent 011 Viable economic use 01 the real croperty resulfed In 0 taking of Plolntlffs' raal \(,: '>'-\-':.~ J? ~ I L....\" ~ '\:'I..rll" s.... propertv WI thout Just corn pensatlo n In Viola tlOr. of PI Gill tiffs' cons tltutlonal fights 37 Plclntlj~5 were compelled ~o sell the subject leol properly for 0- y, v\ :;->..J.. ('" 0"<- o th,.:!' '-' -"' (J $415,000 00. w~leh was be:ow the fair mcrket value of the ieol ~IOp8f:-Y 38 Plaintiffs were damaged by Defendanr's actions In an amou'lt equol to tne fair marker value of the subiecl ! eol property less the sales proceeds received 39 Plaintiff; ndVe retained the upc!ersl';:V1ed low firM Gnd agreed to pay d rea~onoble a Horney's fbes WHEREfORE, Plol~liHs (jprT1ond Judgrne:lt clgolnsi Oefendard lor domGges, costs of thiS cellon. reasonable attuney's lees, end fDr such other and fu,ther rel:er 0$ the Court deems cpproDriote 6 8 d [20v29S1.21. Rau..lo~~1::l &:;~I:J 20E:OI VO DE uer DEMAND FOR TRIAL BY JURY Plaintiffs hereby demand tnal bV Jury on 011 Issues so trloble -)/'/C-;'7 jc.--- (:) I , ? THANiH NGUYEN THOMAS C LlTTl:E? P A " /" / /1 /' ,/ /j " . e &~ 1~- - / " /1) " /' / ~'lc1i5u/L_--- ~-y1--Z:~~v-~1 G - :,_, THOMAS C LITTLE, ESQUIRE 2123 N.E. COGchman ,t;(oad, SUl1e 1>, Clearvvater, FL 33765 (727) 443-5773 F\0nda Bar Number 238783 ! fflA I c__ r I II ~.I I j' '- ! I /1/ l ,,~....} r rY't..~'/A<'-- I,fr" "/'lle \'" I I .....1 \ t;T KIM-TRUe NGUYEN . ,> ,~ u STATE 01= flORIDA COUNTY OF PINEllAS The foregOing Instrument was acknowledged before me this I ,(t-C _ day of Odober, 2003,. by P THANH NGUYEN and T KIM-TRUe NGUYEN, his wife, who IS .pl~rs6no1ry-kno-wnTo-m"e)DI has produced cs lcient,jlcatlon onownooialo"Ke on oaih NOT AF~Y PUBLIC "',,t~,~. ,la'let M SUniVl'fl :'f rA. ....~ MV lnMM1SSlON It DVuS1tJ31 D:r'll:l~ . ~; M-...;,- r 2l:l1"'lry 5 Z006 "ltr'l("f-~'" Ilmlllll.t! rtl:r.-. il!OYl,l.\l, ~~WJJ tln.l~jC /J ()," Slon CJ,('V?--I_l...-t rJ I _4u L~,e..[h}//C) -- 1 (, r\ .) Pnnt ~r;'11\-1(";:"T IVI \ ULL~I V}~i\) STi~TE OF FLORIDA AllARGE My cornmlSSfGr expires 1 6 d 120to2SSL2L ~au.Jo~~1:J ~~lJ elE:Oi '"0 DE uri~[' ~ 6rJrralTLTgD~ ~6%-~i\LoF r/f/Ji<> ^~::~ '~"""..,.,,,<67~ <)"'"J;~:\11 ..,..,........';;0:::.. !) ~ "I ~.,;.="" I;) ~~...} "y'ffl~ ~ ~ t<(?2J' - r-\ -C '-.?'''l ~~. -=- <: ~~t) ';"~\:' - '-..j~tj '=>:y:'fi. --===- ;; ~~ ~r~"'''TSII''~~~~~ O~qD~1~?t'rJoo~~ ULllTl1J1 CITY OF CLEARWATER LO~G RANGE PlANNING DevELOPMENT REvIEW HOUSING DIVISION NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES February 22, 2002 PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FlORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SFRVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRnE AVENUE, Cr EARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONF (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 Mr Patnck T MagUIre, Esq 1253 Park Street Clearwater, FL 33756 Re Case No FL 02-02-04, 3006 Gulf to Bay Blvd Dear Mr MagUIre Under the CommercIal DlstnCt, restaurants, eIther as a flexIble standard or flexIble request, cannot take dIrect access to a major artenal street SInce the sole access for the above referenced property IS on a major artenal (Gulf to Bay Blvd), the request to open a restaurant on thIS property must be processed as a ComprehensIve Infin Redevelopment Project A dIfferent applIcatIon must be filled out to request such I am attachIng a copy of the correct applIcatIon so you may complete It In addItIon, the followmg must be submItted 1 Complete applIcatIon If It IS dIfficult to obtam new sIgnatures on the last page ofthe applIcatIOn, I can utlhze sIgnatures recently submItted on the mcorrect apphcatlOn form 2 BUIldIng elevatIon drawmgs or photographs of the bUIldIng If there are no proposed changes to the extenOl of the bUIldIng, you may mdlcate such In a letter 3 Slgnage - If the eXlstmg SIgn IS planned to be reused, you may mdlcate such In a letter, statmg that the message/sIgn face WIll be changed for the new busIness 4 Parkmg - Need to submIt JustIficatIon for a reductIOn m palkmg from the 15 spaces per 1000 square feet to 8823 spaces per 1000 square feet (for the 18 spaces beIng provIded) Please submit all of the above (original plus 12 copies) by Monday, February 25, 2002, by noon (or earher If pOSSIble). In addItIon, I wIll also need a reduced sIte plan/landscape plan on 8 1'2 X 11 paper for presentatIOn to the Communrty Development Board Should you have any questIons, feel free to call me at 727-562-4504 Smcerely, ~'('LKW~ Wayne M Wells, AICP Semol Planner Attachment S IPIO/llllllg DepmlmelltlC D BIFlexlPelldll1g coses\UpfOJ the lIe.\I DRC\GlIlflO Bay 3006 nUlllh testal/la/l/\Glllflo Bay 3006 Lellet 10 Agellt2-22-02 doc BRII\N] AlJ1\GSl, M.~\OR-CO\!.\IISSIO:--'FR ED H~RJ, VICE M\YOR-CO~I\iINONfR \hIlTNE'r GR.\\ CO\I\IISSIO:--'fR HoYr H~~1IL101\, CO\iMI"'IONfR @ BII L JONSON, CO,\I\IISSIONER "EQUAL [MPIOYMFNJ A"D AFIIRMATfV[ AC.TION EMPIOYrR" jlJ.Ol1UOffbo-, ~6~~lo; rIlE. ~<> ~~~~,"J~"'--"~~R~ 0~~"V I -~~~'" 'I ~,~ ~.ry-\fty1 \ ~ '; q~.'ll~-' '~~-~~ _"I '" · --=:-- '" N"l c>~1 ~ " :"'-.JJkl ",IF" ~Q -~-=- J!:Jf::"I '''~...--- ,,~~,~ ~c: rl;;~;;;ijjJ.~;~' oQ~41E\\,~~~~ 17(7.lJ..l1 Q1l a CITY OF CLEARWATER Lo1\lG Rtu"\JGE PlANNING Dt.\'l;LOPMENT REVIEW HOUSING DMSION NIoIGHBORtlOOD SERVICES PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAl SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH M iRnE AVENUE, Cr FARWATFR, FLORIDA 33,756 TFl EPl-IONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 M<trch 13,2002 Mr Patnck T MagUire, Esg 1253 Park Street Clearwater, FL 33756 RE AppllcatlOn fQr Flexible Standard Development approval to reduce the reqUIred number of parkmg spaces from 15 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area (32 spaces) to 85 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area (18 spaces), reduce the front (south) setback from 25 feet to 3 6 feet to bUIldmg and 12 feet to pavement, reduce the sIde (west) setback from 10 feet to three feet to pavement, reduce the sIde (east) setback from 10 feet to zero feet to a dumpster enclosure and five feet to pavement, reduce the rear (north) setback~from 20 feet to 1 5 feet to pavement and to penmt direct access to a major artenal road (Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard), as a COTIlgrehensIve InfiIl Redevelopment Project under t}1e provIsions of Section 2-704 wIth Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provISIOns of SectIon 3-1202 (Case No FL 02-02-04, 30'0'6 Gulf to Bay Boulevard) Dear Mr Magmre The PJaml1ng staffhas levIewed your applicatIOn to reduce the reqUired number ofparkmg spaces from 15 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area (32 spaces) to 8 5 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area (18 spaces), reduce the front (south) setback from 25 feet to 3 6 feet to buddmg and 12 feet to pavement, reduce the Side (west) setback from 10 feet to three feet to pavement, reduce the sli::le (east) setback from 10 feet to zcro feet to a dumpster enclosure and five feet to pavement, reduce the ry:ar (north) setback from 20' feet to 1 5 feet to pavement and to penmt direct access to a major artefIaI road (Gulf-to- Bay BO\llevard), as a ComprehensIve InfiIl Redevelopment Project under the proVISIons of SectIOn '2-704 WIth ComprehenSIve Landscape Program under the prOV1SIons of Section 3-1202 ",t 3006 Gulf to Bay Boulevard After a prehmmary reVIew of the submltted documents, staff has determmed that th'e applicatton IS complete, pendmg the receipt of the followmg mfom1atlOn by March 18, 2002 (15 caples of the SIte plan) The Site data table on Sheet C3 1 of the sIte plan must be amended as follows o The eXlstmg and proposed bl.}lldmg coverage sh'ould be 1727%, not 1743%, . The rcqUlred FAR IS 0 55, not 040, o It appears that eXlstmg paved vehicular use area IS bemg removed to proVIde mOle overall open space and mtenor landscapmg However, the prOVided paved vehlcular use area IS gteater than tile eXIstmg paved velucular use area Please check YOUI calculattom. and I eVIse accordingly (mcludmg proposed paved vehicular use area If necessary) BRW I J\UNG'iT MWOR COM~\IS'IONFR rn l-l\n VI{:E M \'tOR (OJ't~llSS10NLR \VrlllNL\ Gll \Y COII\ll'SIO\fR HmT J-1H1I1l ON, CO\\\II"IONI ~ tW:\ BII LJON'Or-., CO\I~II~SIO\L1, W 'EQUAL E~IPI OYMFNl A'-D ArrrR!oilAllVE ACTION EM~I mTR" MagUire Marc,h 13, 2002 - Leiter of Complellon Page Two . The eXIstt'ng ImpervIous surface and open space square footage and percentage of the gross site do not add up to the gross site area (when addmg appropnate numbers) (see also above comment), . Confinn the eXIstmg and proposed parkmg lot interIor landscapmg square footage and percentage of the vehicular use area calculations, e The reqUired number of parkmg spaces IS 32 spaces, and e The parkmg calculatIOns should be based on 18 spaces bemg provIded, whIch produces a parkmg ratio used of 8 823 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. 2 The SIte plan must be clanfied as to whether the eXIstmg asphalt or turf block IS bemg removed from the locatIOns adjacent to the 10-mch, 13-mch and 18-111ch oak tree?, which are not bemg shown or calcutated as parkmg spaces If these areas are tb become landscaped areas, please mdlcate that curbmg or other measures acceptable to Code to ensure non-encroachment by vehicles II1to these areas If pavement (asphalt or turf block) IS bemg removed from these areas, ensure that the Site data reflects such 3. DlmenslOn the Width of the landscape buffer area on the west and east SIdes ofthe site 4 The dumpster enclosure Will be needed bUIlt to City speCIficatIOns The Development ReVIew Committee (DRC) WIll reVIew the application for suffiCIency at 11 15 a III on March 14, 2002, In the Planmng Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the mUnICipal servIce bUIldmg, 100 South Myrtle Avenue m Clearwater You or a representatIve must be present to answer any questlOns that the DRC may have regardmg your applIcation If you have any questIOns, please do not heSitate to call me at 727~562-4504 Smcerely your;;, W~"'- M ~ \-J~ Wayne1vt Wells, AlCP Semor Planner Cc Phuoc Thanh N g!lyen Northslde Engmeenng Servlces, Inc S V)falllllllg Depmtmem\C D BIFfe-,JPendrng cases\Upfbl the next DRCIGulfto Bay 3006 Thanh lestaU/ant\GlIlfto Bay 3006 Complete Leltel doc 62/22/2662 13:22 7275624576 -,,--- t---- PLAN - -''\ PAGE 03 ..; ; Cleatwater u~ ~ ~~ 1 DO SclUIh MJr1>> AvtnUI Cb.d...., PtlmI$I 3i1'7SIS ~Illl m.stJ2.4MI'T FIIlt 'l'Z7-!iB2.....mJ CAlE .: 0 2.. - 0 z.. p 0 OATE RECEIVED' &- oz... RECEIVED BY (1bI1'1' In Aha). - ATLAS PAtH lit; z.. '1 'Z.... A. ZONINO DISTRICT' C lAND USE Cl.A86IFK:A.TlON C. ~ ZONING 6. LAND USE CLASBIFICATlON OF I ADJACENT PROPERTIES' NORTH' C c.q SOIJT\ot. c... (' (I" WEST c.. LC EAST' c... ~ J C BUB!MIT ORIGINAL stGNED AND NOTARm:D APPLICATION o SUBMIT 12 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPUCA110N Ih:cIUrilf\1l'a1m:1." IJ 8U1UIT APPUCA'nON fEE " 1205 FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Colllprelleuivlllldll Redevelop.eat Projed ~ '7n6l(1) -PLEASE TYPE. Oil PRINT- _~I"a~ A. APPUCANT. PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INIFORMA noN: (8eCtIon 4-20J.A) APPUCoMTNAMf.: Nguyen, Phuoc Thanh tMlUNG ADORe88 .2 22 3 Har n Blvd., C1ea rwa ter, FL 33764 !-UAIL ADDRESS: pHONE NUMI!lE.II 7 2 7 - 7 9 6 - 0 6 2 2 caLL NUMBER- FAX NUMBER 7 2 7 - 4 4 6 - 3 7 41 PROPERTYO'lNNER(S)' 'l'hanh Phuoc Nquyen and Klm-Truc Thl Nquyen ~...... ALL.....} AGENTNN4(S)' Pa tr lck T. Maqulre I ESQ". MAfUNGADDRESS. 1253 Pa rk Street, Clearwater, FL 33756 E-MAIL ADDRESS. PHONE NUYlER: 7 ? 7 - 4 4 ? - 1 8 i R CELL NUMBeR FAX NUMBER 727-446-3741 - I: 0 lr-l~ U6 ~ lJ VJ ~ \ ~ \ I! <'! 1 l \ I ;' ',\ EER 2 ~ 7nm ill \ IULll i~ ~ ~ II'LI''':'~ . " ..t, u... 1- ..orl. '-rHSVC >, ~ __,-,r~ "X..FL_.. B. ....OP08ED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: BmEETADORESSl'!"*P=4.... 3006 Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. LEBAL DESCRIPTION. PARCEL NUIleER. PARcaSlZE' 12348sq. ft. / 0.283 AC MOL (io;InIs. ....- PFlOPOSED USE AND SI2E: Re 5 tau ran t ~ rI cbdng Uft!2a. tdIt ..,. or..... b:IlIp at I~. LI f .tW_l DESCRIP'nONOF REQUEST{S): Reductlon of perlmeter landscape Buffer area. reductlo 0MdIIlIlt d ~.........~' a.g noduldICm In ~ I'NlIItler or I/IIrldfta .-.,~ IIB,_J of requlred parklnq, allow access dlrectLY on arterla~'Lor restaurant DOES THIS APPUCAnON INVOl.vE THE TRANSFER OF OEVE!.OPUENT RIGKTB (TOR), A PREVlOU8L Y APPROVED PLANNED UNIT ::;~NT. OR A PR!VlOUSI.Y APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO _ (If y;a, alIIJdt. CClIIY d U. ~~ PIlII t ar 1-"'" OIr.Lt'O'...IIU. ~ . EM......_..M.ln!I...;rd'Wfo"'....t ~ cay err ca- ..~ B2{22/2BB2 13:22 7275624576 PlAN PAGE 84 ~ ~ .". I C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Section ~2.A) lJ SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TTTlE INSURANCE POLICY. cEEO TO ntE PR.OF'ERT't' OR. SIGN AFFIDAvrr ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (- P.S) D. WRITTEN SUBMmAL REQUIREIIIl!NTS: (ScdIon 3-813.A) o PrcMcIe comptaIe respclNlelD 10 th8 .. (6) GENERAL APPUCABILm CRITERiA: 1. TM prop.oaed doveIopmenl of the I.,u:I will be In harmony wtItI the scab. bull. COWI1llI, c1enGlCy and ch8rIdiitr of ~nl PfOPIIrthls In whId1lt illoc:Ited. 1 h , The ro ert lS 1m roved wlth a structure" slte 1m rovements, W11C were developed In accordance wlth an a proved slte pan. cb ~i~t~~tn~l~GaEh~ Commun1ty DEvel. Code. e and 2. ThIll pI1JpOIed d&vdapmant'" nat I\Indef QI' dllJCOUJ'IIIl me appraptMe deYelopmllnllnd ues of ia:lJmcent IsM IIlIld tNIIdInga or a1gnll'antly ~ hl ViIhllI~. 1 Adlacent propert1es are developed and ln use, and a restaurant Wl 1 not neqat1vely lmpact adlOln1nq propertles as such use 18 cons~stent wlth code. 3 The pl'OPCIMCI developmlnt will not JClvlruly 6d tIut IW1I!I'l or aaf8ty or persona nt:IIdln; Of' working In IN! nelgNmrflcod of the ~ A r~taurant use w1th m1nlmal flex1ble standards 15 appropr1ate to the nelqhborhood. 4 The ~ dlMllopmenllll dnlgMd 10 ",1r)1mIza trlfftc cangeltlQn. 1 Only one drlveWay connectlon lS ava1lable, Gulf-to-Bay 15 a maJor 'qrter1a and trlp qenerat10n should be 1nsubstant1al. 5. The prapased develOpmtlnt III ccnall1ent with th8 cammunlt)' chllmdDr of thellml'nl!ldiatlt vldnlty of the pmgal PfClPOI8d fat dlmIloprrIent. ~he l1SP- lS code conslstent and conslstent wlth the commerc1al corrldor. 6 The delllgn of the prapollOd dev~nl mll'llmlzM ecfWrut .lYecI8, Including vIauaI, acol.lltlc: .nd oIfa:tary ItlCI houl1l rIf apmiltlcn ~ ~~m~m~~ The buffer1ng of the property by other landscap1ng and heal h ~ and have a ffiln1mal 1mpact on t e Gu -go- a~ corrl or. n-F ~rlJn1n'n'J prnppri-y p~rkln'il Aft-pr nfflcP nOllrs lS pa 109 requ'e te n+~Qmr~~ +n n~+~,n be1ng at<tempted. lJ Pl'ovJr;tQ camplete I8ICIOfI1\mlIa tttelB1l (10) COMPREHENSIVE INFll1. REDEVEl.OPMENT PROJECTCRlTERIA (e IIPPUcabIe):' 1, 'T'he dewslclpmllJlt ell' ...do.eloomenl of 1M pllIrcel pRlJXl68d far dlMllopment Is othefwIae mpnc::lk:al wItI'laut dfwlltlon8l'rDm the UlIlI 1l'l"'" Iilnd ~ standards. ' Slze, locat1on and acc~ss to property, along w~th eX1st1ng 1mprovements woplCl~equlLe some dev1atlons from dev~lopm~~ndards. - -- ::--- 2.. The development af !hit pII1l:IIl proposed for c1ewlapment 8lli II comprehen6Ntllnflll ~nt ptCllOct Dl' resldemleJl tnfID Pl'OPJCt WIll 1'1<< reductl thlI fIIrr ITIiIl'Iu!d yallle of abutting propenla (I nelude th& nsstIng V111u1 of tha lie and the propoaad value of thI .1bI 'IWIItI ... Be'~b,ooo.oo. After cosmet1c changes 400,000.00 ~ ------ ~-- ~ ...- - -- . PuglD 2 of 8 - FleKIbb Dllvctlopment AppllcoHon. CMnp,.n.n8lv8 InIlD ~rnent FfOJed.- OIly 01 CIellINI'lItOt e2~22/20e2 13.22 7275624576 PLAN PAGE 135 J 3. The UlMlf wI!hIn tho Clomp'MaNu'" InftII rtIdlrIMlapmOrtt ~ .,., othelWille pennItecIllt e- CItJ of CbGIMtet Restautants permltted In "e" zonlnq, but not wlth arterlal access, slte llffilted to arterlal access. 4 The _ Of mil err uee wtI:hIn the cornpl"llhenolye Iinfil.I ~nt prqsc:t n ......~ wIih ~e&nt lInd .,... Restaurant use, more deslrable than pr10r "adult" use and cOffipatlble w1th surroundlng uses. 5 Sllllilble .... for doYalopmenl or l1lde.eIopmenl Df thII UMI Dl' mllI: of UtlliJ!ll within ItIe c:orr4lllhe:nsIvo tnfIIIl.~ projRI et'8 not ~ ~ In UIe CIty r:ACMIwetlIr Sole access 0 arte lal r se e en thou h other propert1es wlho~t arter1al access eXlst. e n. dsVa~~ of Ihla plIIJ'l:8 ptOPOa(ld fI:Ir dGottIopmenI sa III tompnm.nalve InftIl ~ praJM:l will upgrnde the ~ 'ItoInIIy d...~~fot~nl The property's ~roposed use 1S the only ecom1cally v1able alternatlve. Accord1nalv, the orooertv has rema1ned vacant and shows neqlect. A lesser use w1ll only result ln mln1mal upgrade. 1 and C1ty. 8 FIrmbiIrty In ro;ard tel lot 'III!dth, f*lulned setbadta. hetgt'lt .and oft'-ttreet plIrklng 1m JuBtlfiad by the bene4tt81D CCIlTIfYlUt'Ity d'illl'llCbW end the mmadl_ vldnlty of tnQ parcel r;vopoHd tar ~nt .nd tl'll City of CIIJ.a1\dt8r .. . who_ See above. 9_ Adequa" otl'-ItJ\'Mlt pIilmlng In the ImlTl:lllCllate VIcInity oe=rdlnQ to the ah.11Kt pmklng formuIIln DIviDIofl14 of' Artldo 3 will be IIQlIobIlt 10 ;voId CIrHItIUt palttlng In ttw Imrnldllte vldnly of parcel prvpoHd for deVeIopmenl nn ~~rpp~ pRrklng lS not aVRllable In vlClnltV. 10 The dellQn of all buildings cornpQe:l with the Toul'lIt Dfatrtd: 01 DalImkmfn 0IttrIcI. design lJuldllfinn In DMoIon !Ii CI'f.Mic::hl3 (fllJ ~t.~l UN ~ III'lBWIlU ~ N/A Pogo 3 of e - f1eJ(lble Devrdopmen1 A.ppllclltlon. Comp~1I In'lI ~eIopment Ptojeet- CItyof' CIaIlnwIllIll' __ E!2.'22f.2602 13: 22 7275624576 - - PLAN PAGE 06 E. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT8: (SectIon 4-202.A) C SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (tndudlng dtmen,lonll of JIIOPIlrllf) - 0,. ottgIMI Dnd 12 ;optae; IJ COPV OF RECORDED PLAT,IIlIIWllCIIlblil; IJI PREUWNARY PiA T, _ rwqulred, C LOCA11ON MAP Of THE PROPERTY, C TREE suRVEY (lndudlng lIDbn9 t/8M DflIIt8 .nc1 within 26. of lM .qecent site. _ ~, - (OEIH." Of g,..." wlDc:lllton, \ idudin8 drip.... end ~ IrI8s to bIJ ren"O'lMd). o GRADING PlAN. I;D 0JIP'lt,...- F. 8rTE PLAN SUBLVUTTAL REQUIREMENTS: (8ectlOIl't 40-202.A) c SITE Pl.AN wtlh ItII foIIOMng InformItkm lnot to...-d 24" II .,. N. cI!mMIOlon5: NDrIrl Imwr. ~ bIlr &em (mlnlmlBft .... aM Inc:t1 eQUail50 feot), IlInd dIt1 PJ*rad, L.tatlon map. InDlP: or.et: ~~ IndMduII ,h8rIIs. mcIudocIln ~, FOCJtprinI and liD r:ll1l1f EXIST1NG bUlldlnp.nd ItrUduIW, FDCtprinI: III1d ola rI mB PROPOSED build. ..., 1INdUrn. AIlIl!lQ\l1nld lIIIIIlt'lCkI: AIlIn1i1Ung end ~ paintII of lilCIDIIU; All IllIlfUIIud lIISnt tnangIIls, ~ of anv\rom'nI!nIDIly unique I,..., lluctl lIS waten;:ou,.... MtIIndI, tIN 1IUlSIIU, 8nd u,pIIdrnen __, IndudInIiI ~ and Ioc:ItInn of undlflitoly, ground cover voglltlltion and wildlife tlsbltllt8, de; ~ of 811 pu;bIIc llU'ld prtvlJte NIGITl8nt1. Loc:Iitkln at 8JI Gtmst rlghtHlf..way dill e.f'lCI ~ to the . LcaIlOn of lJXI8tIng pubIb:: ene! pri1fllte lIlIIrbn. lAc:Iudlng finl hydrantl, fiorm and ..nb~ MIler Il/1IR, rnlnholtlL'l end 11ft 1ItlItIonG. pi I!nd wrder "1WlII. All pIIrklng epecea ~,Il)admg IlIteU Ind vMIlcULGr uoe .",... tncNcIlng ~ ~, DupdIon by aMdln; or CRlAhatchlng of IU requlnJCl parking tot Int8rIor ~ llIfUI, l.ocCIon or d refuD8 colis c::tior1lac:llltlmll1lnct encIoaUIW (m In In\I.lm 12..., 0' ctet1r epoDII). LoQl;dIan of .11 ~ mltllrktl, Locl!ltIon of all JurledlctlonalllnM adja otnI: to WIflIandt.. Lcc8liDfl d all ONIlt1llncl otrak8 fliorm-water mIl~mcmI fldl_, L.oGubon of till ouIdoar lighting fbtl\IP8B, and l.oc:ldion of aU exIllIlncllolnd propclSIlld ~ C BITE D'oTA TABLE for eldsting mqulred, and ~ d8v81(lpl'Nlnl in wrfttenItI!bulm" bm Land ImlJll In &qUite fe8l: and BCIfi, Humber of EXIST1NG ct-Illng unbInd PROPOSED dwellIrtg ,,1'1III: Gn:lu IIDor Ill,. doVotllIll tel uch Ll8lJ. Pal'kIn; SpIIl3B tctal nllmber, pnnanbild In tabular form with tho "umber 0'1 requlrwd apICH, Tala! paved nil, tnducllng d pevecl PIIrkln; spacu and d$ew8yl. ltlIpr8UIId In 1QlJ8!8 fHI: and pel'C&flt8ge of ttI8 pned ~..... S. IInd ap$deD of e111endKapa rm1WIaI, OfIIdaIlIlcon:ill book and PIl9t t'lUrntmnl of &II IIiddng utility oaummtt BulldJn; omIllNCtLl19 halgtdD. ImpermIJabl:llal.llface T1tIo (I. S R), Iilftd Floor InllIl'1ItIo (FAR) fat mlJ nonmldentlm - C REDUCED SITE PLAN co sea. (8 'H, X 11) and ca60r renctenn; "poublit lJ FOR DEVEI..OPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, pJ"CN'ldl U'lI fol\owlng MdlUonat Infon'ndcln on de pSln. _ 0n040aI can!oum or &pOt lIlIIlvGtlonI on de, 0l!aRa elaveUon& If.wqund ta evalU8tG the ~ aormvm.r menlgCmeflt for the plltC8l, All cpet1lSf)DC13 ... LocItian of all emrUI Ot water retaining walllil end .-r!h bem'II: Lot Ilna end buMdln;1!ne:a (dIrn0nGIOntJd), StIwts and c1nwe (dllMl'lIloMd); BuIlding and ,tr\ld!JnaJ IGtbIM::ka (~): SWctural overtllnge, Tl'lIIilllMlntory, prepared by 0 .C191t1ftad IIJ'I:sonIr, of In trH!I 0' DBH Of gteater, re1'IIctlng ala. canopy (drip 1Inel!l) and condIUon of lluch tren PlI(le 4 or 8 - Flexible Dav.mprm;nt Appllclltlon . ComPfehen9WelnfDI FBtwolQpmen1 FfaJDd- CIty of Chlarwlllllll' ~2/22/2002 13:22 7275624576 r~ PLAN PAGE 07 G. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (SectIon ....11Dz.A) o LANDSCAPE PLAN All e:xIttIn; .nd P J'OPClS8CIIltl'UdUre8, NIIft8Il or ob\rttIng 1IIIU8t&. DraI:nIlS8 IInd retentlDn lreas lncludtns ...10&, lIkb IIopM and bottDm ~... DDIlne.etlon and dJmenl,lona of III fIlqulted ~ tIlndlClllP! buffera, Sight VlIIbtIIly lntngle8, Dillln8lltlon end dlmenslonll oI.n periUng IIl'M1l1lndudlng lancIlK:tPIng IIIIflda and CUlbIng. Propoasd IiInd requJrwd perldn; ap8ClnI, Exi8tIng uws on-tb and If'nmedllltely sdJIIGIIIfIl to 1M _, by 1peCl!I$, &1m and klaltJon&. Induclll1g d~ (lllIlncllC8t6d,on l1IqUlf'6d _ BUl'\Iey), Locdon, ... deIetIption, ~ne and qUllnIllJel or an uIstIne and ptopaBllJd Qlnd.KQpe mmrtllt, tncfudlng bctan~ end common nBIYMPS, T~ planlmg details for~, palma, lIhrutIS ond llmuncl COWlr plant8lndudmg 1nstrUcllona, d mbl8&. bIIc1dl1J1ng, Iftll)chlng and ~ mllISlWnt:El, 1nt8fI0I' ~ IUOP I'IotchscIlncUOl' llh&ld8d and labeled and Interior IlllntJlcape ClIMSr&gS!l, 0'JPl'8881ng In both IIqLWe Int w perotfttlOS cavatId. CoRdItlDna or II p~' dlMllapmGnI epprcwIl (e g condltloni II1lpoaed by II'ICl Comrmmlr:Y [)avetcpn'Ient Ioafd); Imgdon notsa 1:1 REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to I\C8IIII (8 ~ X , 1) (eoiDr rwlOflf1ng If paoelble) o 1RfUBA,110N PLAN (mQuIJW! tar Level TWD' and ThIIlII 1OJI11C:lJtlQlm) o COMPREHENSIVE I..ANDSCAPE PROGRAM llIpPllWltlon, 01 appIlcIbIt H. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMrTTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Onl8n Crtterll ..nullend 4-2C12.A.21 ) o STORMWATER. PLAN mdudlng tht following lIlqulrem8nt1. E:IllatIng lDpograptly adBndmg 50 feet a.yond ID praperty I!mm, PrapoNd gradlng mdUOlng f1nmhed f1g(ll' ellw8tlona oIlII1ltn.oc:tufe1. /IJJ 8ld/m:etd 5U'Nb and municipal atDfm aptlilmS PropoMd ltarmwotar detentlonlr8\8ntlon lru. includIng lop of bank, toI or alope and outIM cantral 8tf\IdUr'IL. Slbo" IMItOr CllIlculllbonll for att8nualn::m Ind wRDf quullty; Signature of FIoI'ld II I'IlQlatorod ProfM.a&Ol\II EnllNlr on III pllne and cd::u1Dtlons lJ COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRV LETTER. OR SDUTHlNEST FLORIDA WATER MA~EMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMO) PERMIT SUBMITTAl. (SWF\\'MD IipplO'A'IIIG requlntd ptiol'lO I""!lanal 01 Oily BI.litdin8 Permit), If iIppIiCObl8 Q COPY OF STATE AND COUNTY STORMVIIA'reR. SYSTEM TIE-IN PERMIT APPLICATIONS, If RPpllcabte I. BUILDING ELEVAT10N PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (SectIon 4-2D2.A.23) R.eQ1.l1r8cl III 1M l!IWf\t lM applu:8tlon lncIultu a develO9""ent whure design aundardl. arc In I&&us (ID g Toul16t and DoI!lIntCM'n 0Istrt0tu) CIf - pan oIs Cotr\pIwilwMIW 1"1\11 Red&wlopment PI'Djec.:l or. RQIdentlallrrftll Prcp::t lJ BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - sir skin of DII Dulldlnga 1nducImg: height dlmoMIon8, colcrB and rnatc11lll1l!l g REDUCED BUILDING ELEVAT10NS - tour ~ of blli!Cllng wih eokn anI! materlalllO &elite (8 ~ X , 1) (bleldl: and wl'llte and color n!lndMtns, If paulblt) lDll roq ulJ1lld J. BIGNAGE: (SectIon ....202A18) Q ComprahGnQIVO Sign Pfogrwm IlIpplICBbon, It ,ppllcabB (uplL'ItB IIJlPHc:at1on and'" ,..,Ired) o RedI,lODd qnGgIl proposal (8 % X 11) (coIor)," IUbmlltlng CO'mpralulMMt Sign Prog!'lilfTl pPPIJcabon K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4--ZD2.A.13 Bind 4-801.C) C Include U reaull8d If proposed lIeVeloprnent will dltQradelh8 llC08ptab1e level of 1MVIC8 for any roactwIly 118 lIdopl8d 1tl the Comprehen8Ne Plan Tnp generation shall be baaed on the mOSI r8CIInt IIdltlon of the InstllL1le ct' Tf1lNl9OrtiLbon Engll"letlr'fJ Trip General MIInulll Rem to Secbon 4-801 C of h Communlly OBVIIlapmllnt CocIe tar exemptions to tn... requlrer'nent. PIlp lli of e - FlexlbtD Dawe\opmflnt AppUc.atlon - Com~herwvlllrrflIl RIldGvlJlopmrmt flRrJIllCI:- Clly or Clesrwater ~2/22/2002 13:22 7275624575 PLAN PAGE 08 --- L. SIGNATURE: J, !tie undersl;nwd, IicltnoWledge that alllllpreuntet/ons rMCIe In lhl& appllcallon MI bull and lIccurele to th8 bills! of my knDWl9dg_ and auttlorue City repml'M!Int&1IwrrJ, to "Ill It and photograph the p~rty dncrlbcd In thiD appIlartlon STATE OF FLORIDA. COUNTY OF PlNIl..LAS cf- m 10 lInd BubflCllbed blIIIo,. me th18 ~ day of /. ~. A,C. 20 rJ v 10 me endJor----by- z p, 6'-1/ e IV woo 18 ~raonally known hu pnJCttll:IId -p~ ldemtfl....dll..n, ~ "....~ of MY COMMISSION EXPIRES OF F\.. SEPT 30 2004 M. AFFIDAvrf TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: Thanh phuoc Nguyen and K~m True Thl Nguyen (Nan'ldl1il at aU pnlJIGrty QWrIlIft) T1m (I emhtIe Ire) the fJWftIIr(l) and record tltIe hold8r(l) of the following described property (8ddmss or genellill tccation) 3006 Gulf-to-B'av Blvd. 2 Ttml: this plDpllIrty D'JnldlMea the property far whICh III mquast fer a, (dneribe requ..) Comprehenslve Inflll Redevelonment 3 ThaI the undenlgned (tUHl1l11VO) appomted and (d08llldol appalnl' Patrlck T. MaqUlre, Eso. lIS (hml\hallr) agenl(llI) to eueute any petrllans or om&!' documellll neeessary kl erflld: aueh petibon, 3 Thm this o1'IIdL'IVit has brton e@ClJtad 10 Induce !he City of CIilBl'WlIter, Florlds to eonralder and ad on thlt above de8Cf\bed property, 4 Thlllltnl GJlpllCl1l1'l1 acknowledgelthat all Impact ,"s (palM and ~l!IIICln, trame, I!lte.l will be pu:t PRIOR to 1he IsIllUllROe of I building P8nY1it, eel1l1lcl1e at OCClJllG'ncy, Of' other madllilnlBm, wflJche\fllr occurs tlmt 5 That SIte viens ~ the propany 11111 M!3lI9lIIry by City 1'8JI!1QenUI1lvea In order to pmt:8BS this 8pl:IIlcatJon Gnd l:h& owner 8luItIortEe8 CIIy representetiYee to Yl&1I om! P~f1IJJl'l1he property deac:rIbed In this apphcabon, 8 ThB1 (I/we), the urtdrllnugnacl aultlority, hereby CIlIrtIfy lhm the famgomg 18 true and lXlrreCl C ~ ~~iA' &-/;wa- PI'OP8"y Owner t STATE OF FLORIDAt COUNTY OF P1NBlAS BefuI1l m. UtII undersigned, IIn of!'k:8r duly cammlllSlOned byli'tB Iaw& 01 the Stale of FlOtida, on thIS 1<' p h r 11 A :r; y.. ? 0 n ]leNOn.11y 8P9ili\red Th DepOMt end OlIIyIS tIlel he/sha Ki o,to- ~('" JEWElRHBN$M1TH My Commlaalon &pl",s' ~ ~ CC'dMISSlON NUMBiA ... ~ CC96581 0 -p ~ MY COl.lMlSSlON EXPIRES S 30 & \ReIlllJng Do(>>n/fllfl'ltlAppllcBtIOrl 1'omI,\lmiotODmenl 19W''-lcomplll!ltMlI/W Infn( oppIkllt1an2 l1Ot; 25th day of no ~ng been fIm duly IS\lIIOlTl f~~ NateI)' Public PBge e of 6 - F1mubll Development Appllc4tlaft . Campr.tlenulyslnfRl RIlcIBVllIlopmcnl ProJGCI:- Clly of ClearwlJttlr ''It CI I N CI I N CI ....J U. =It Q) en co: U 1.- ~ en Q) :!:: > :p C) <( '" 2 o z 't:I N II> 0 ~ 0 't:I N Q. N ::l 't:I 2 >- c.. ~ I:lI l- e. ::2: ::l 't:IQi -> 0<>> ::E:..J UJ iF z c 8 '" c: <>> E E o () o z .,.... ;:;, ." "0 J: o Z .l!l C <ll E E o () o Z c: OJ E c. o OJ > <ll Cl <Il :n x <Il u:: N o o t:! N N N ro C N o o t:! N .... ;ry N o o N N N N N o o N N t:! N N o o ?;j ?;j 't:I "'6 I o Z N o o t:! N N N .:'l C OJ E E o U o z N o o t:! .,.... .... ;:;, c.. I- ~ II> U .C Qi > o ~ u "0 I UJ W Z Z o 0 o 0 ~I ffi N o o t:! .... .... ;:;, N o o N N N N .:'l C Q) E E o u o Z N o o t:! .... .... f"; c.. I- ::2: "'0 "0 I o Z (fj w w N o o t:! .... f"; N N o 0 o 0 N N N N N N N 'N N o o N N ~ '" c: Q) E E o u o Z N o o ~ .... ;:;, c.. I- ::2: "'0 "0 I o Z w w Z z o 0 Cl 0 Il:: U1 ~ -. 0 N N o 0 o 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ N o o N N N N C ro 2:;:; 'E~ Q)~ Ero'" 5"E Q U~:a Il:: iJj C ~~8 o c <>> zg5; N o o t:! t:: <"> Il:: S Cl "'0 "0 I o Z N o o N N N N N o o N N N N Q) tJ ro N o o N f"; .... f"; <.9 -. I- u "0 I o Z w Z o o <.9 -. I- N o o N M .... M N N o 0 o 0 N N N N t:! N N N N N o 0 o 0 ~ ~ N N N C\;l '" c g ii c 8 <ll <ll '" N o o N ~ .,.... .... <') '" i:: OJ E E o L> o C N o o N N ;ry "' c g ii c 8 <ll <ll Vl "' c ~ u c 8 <ll ID II> N o o N N .... f"; N o o N N .... f"; N o o N N N N N o o N N N N c.. I- ::2: a. I- ::2: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a. !--- :2: a. I- ::2: N o o ~ ,-- ;ry N o o t:! '<f .... ;ry ~ "'0 "0 I o Z u "0 I o Z ID "'0 c: 'iii > o ~ u '0 I Ql U E Ql > o ~ "0 "0 I u "0 I o Z u "'6 I o Z <.9 ...J Il:: c.. I- :E u "'6 I o Z "0 "0 I o Z u "0 I o Z w w z z o 0 Cl Cl UJ Z o Cl w w z z o 0 o 0 <(I g: Il:: ~ N o o t:! ,.... N o o N N ..- ;ry "0 "'6 I o Z "0 (5 I o Z >- I:lI CD g ~ ~ ~ "0 III r:: 00 ;;;1- '" <C <"l III ~ o N <II 'lii o III '; o a. I- :::!: N o o N N .... M N o o N N N N ,-- ;ry -- <"> N o o N N N N N o o N N ~ w w z z o 0 Cl Cl <.9, uJ ::2: ::2: <:I') - o N N o 0 o 0 ~ ~ N N .... .... M. M Q) Ol CO Q.. N o o N N N o o t:! N N N N N o 0 o 0 N N N N N N N N N N o 0 o 0 ~ ~ N N N N N o o N N N N N o o N -- N N N N o o N -- N N N N o o N N ?;j N o o N N N N N o o N N N N N o o N N N N 'iii c c ro ;: 1'[ '8 0 c... II> II) &! "' c. S <ll i: "' e LL <ll Q) "0 C "'0 C a. II) <3 Q ~ i: i: s: ;: <>> Q) r:. ro "0 Ql Q) ;: Ql > Qi OJ L> C. ;c L> Q) s: Il:: II) s: ~ c :; s: s: ~ ~ s: <<> ro 0 L> er::: <ll Q) <<> er::: I: f!! E :J er::: er::: i: er::: .a '-' rn u >- 0 0 u ::E 1!l 2 ;: u OJ :J Ql Cl a c U <( .:'l l!? U Ql OJ Ql ~ 0 s: Cl c Q c l!! ro 2: '" c iii ... '0 ~ Ql iij <ll Q) III s: er::: ro Ql Q) W ;: ~ iJj I- Cl :J i: S cr: E ::2: U If) <<> ~ er::: <<> u "5 'iii 2 "'=' III E er::: u c ~ III :J C .:<:. -g "0 ro :e: II> 0 Ql 0 ro OJ c N <0 <( U5 ....I ...J 0 Cl > ~ I- ii.i u.. c.. Vl ...J ...J I- LU 0 lO If) '<f 0 <0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -- .a- 0 0 0 If) Lf) w 0 f'- f'- ~ '" M M '<t '" .... ~ M ;; ;; N M ;!; Lf) w ...... co N <<:t ;; ;: ~ ~ ~ N 0 .,.... 0 0 0 0 0 0 -- <<:t ii r2 r2 <( <( 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <:I') 0::: 0::: 0::: 0:: 0:: 0::: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0::: 0::: 0::: 0::: 0::: <C :; ;; <( <( ;; <( <C ;; ~ ;; <( <( <( ;; <( <( <( <( > > > > > > > > > > > 1ii ,....; Q)..... - en f.I) -;:: Q) 0 ~ en 0. en ~ ~~ ~o c ~ L ro~~ W ~ 0~ ~ O~ ~O .,i;:; Q) -g Q) Ll') 0 c. ~ 0 ~ ~ -5 :5 0(5 L. .. a tn ~ g M ~ ~ J::: t: - .s 0 - ~~ ~~ 0 ~E2 ~x ~ ~~~u_o~m ~Q~E -~ crou~~ 0 O~~m~~2 c- 0 ~ ~romc5~mro m~~~o-um c~~ 0 ~o mmo c~ro~ro D o~ ~~ - ~~~;~~m~a >mQ~m~~~ ro2o~ ~~ g~~~~ D5Qm1~o~ro~€~ ..92E 0..0 ~a::: ~~e;C't1la:5m~~~l:2mO>~c::- ~=.EQ)u).o(l) .!]~.co~ t)m"t:E+-'~l::m~nJjcrar ~~~~~~~ ~~a:~Ecm~~u~~~~~~~ ~~~~ag~ ~cE~g E5:E=~~]~~rog ; c.g fi &~ LL (i: .9~~ ~ g; 5 : 5 'E ~ ~ s ~ ~ ~.!.c = ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ c ~ ~ ~ =: ~ g c ~ 2 j; c ~ ~ ~ : ~:5 ro ro2o~~~~ 5~UQI~~~~8~ro~~mcro5~m~u~3~~ ~muoo*~~~~~o~~~o2~~ ~-~~m~~ ~~~~ ~~~UOm=O~ ~~ ~~~mO~o c m- ~~no~wmc~~ ~ro~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ > 15 g. m ~ 6 ~ ~ [ m ~ ~~: c. ~ ~ -g ~ .g ro 1j ~ ~ ~ g 'E ~ ~ ~ .g ~ ] ~:: ~ ~ ~ ~ e; ~ ~ 3:~ B ; ~ ~ ~ @ 1Il:S u ~ 8 c" m - ~ m E ~ c.u 0 m 13 ~ g' ~ ~ ro ro 2 2 !!! 0 ~ u C. ~ ro Q) 1Il ~]g 0 ~'~ g 1Il ro ro E ~,.... '" 15 - ~ :il m ~~~~rn*~~n>~_~m~>~>~3~~~~~~u~~~~~;rn w~nS~~m~~@c~~ m~;EB ~ FOc~~~~o~~oro~~-~~~~o~~N~~o~oo~~m~= ~30~~0~~~a~g~~~~~~~ o o,....Q)~_N~_~>c~u>ro>rouoE~~ 22~ounuum~~~~ocroro"'Dc"'cro7~oroOroQ)u Z ~MEDS~DoDro@>Ce~ro2ccmD~8~~nDDeCc~DrocD~~~~e~~R~Ooro~um25o roUm~~""'~C~QDO~urou~m=>~",_~~roro~u~ro~~~ro~~Dro"'~DomDB,....o_~~uoo " C'l 0 m 0 C'l " ~ Co ~ ,.... ?; "tI 0... .....:>. ~m ~ e. ::?: :I "C "tI'ii ;'15 - > I Be-st Copy o Q) :I:....I 0 Z 0 Available e. ...J ''It III 0 0 r5 I I ('III :>. 0 m Cl) I C ~ ('I, 0 0 c ...J "tI m U. Co ~~ ~ =It .-:! C'? ..... Q.) 0 (I) N ca Q) (J <') 0> ro L.. 'lii l1.. .E c tJ) C'l Q.) 0 N 0 m C'l ..... 'lii N ':; c ~ ;i 0 <C C'l 0 0 m N 'lii N C'l c N ~ C <Il 0 :;- a (I) ;: cr: l.I ~ :E (II c (I) E l1.. C ~ N (!) 0 l.D N j::: r-- l:- is N "<t ~ M o::t ti 0 0:: 0:{ <( > 't:l Ql -;; 't:l C. :::! '" '" - ~ C <l> 01);::: 3:c>. 9 ~ ~E S~i~ _ ~9% ~ - ~ Ql --Ql~ 01) Ql~E > ~ ~eE OC~'" ~01)~E ~ ~ 0__ ~O-E>. Ql~~~~Ql Ql~ Ql ""UoJ - -0_ ~O 00- 0>:> > oJ01)~~~oJOcG -UBU-oOC<l> >. ~~~g3:~~Ql ~O>' ~~~~> n "'E~"'QloJu:;;.9 E-u.9<l>.o "-=~'" - oJ ~ ~~-~- ~~ ~E"'~ _ ffi ~Ql"'2-Ql"'",-= QlO~O'" Ql~mc "'~~C~C~-U~"'o>~ _ ~EQlOQl E oJ C 0> Ql Ql 0 c~ '" E ~ Co oJ C. 0> C. ~ C _ '0 U E ~ Ql <l> C -0::: - D m c c _ 0)- _ g~~~~'~~:~~I~~.~~.;~g~ g~I~~~~~!!~III~I~II~lo '" iE_~QlUOU"'DC<l>D~~~2~U~C.C .E! , - 0 '" <l> D C Ql ~ Ql C.C '" 0) 0. o 5.29-.Q~i'O.!!!:r: <l>n '" t:l t:l z c. on_ ~ ~ ~ ~ M M ~ '" ~ o I .9 u .!!! rn Ell) <l>~ "'5 C:g' ~~ Eu oc om 't:l Ql -;:., ~llJ c. :::! Il.. l- ~ Il.. l- ~ Best Copy Av-ailab'e -ciii - > o III ::E:..J U '0 "'5 "'5 X 1: o 0 Z Z C. III -.:::t r5 c I >- N ~ C Ql c: I 0 N, CI C "C -I III c: 0 LL. ~1- III . . <II ~ cs: CD (/) ra M <.) 2 oJ '- C 0 14- (/) N CD Ql .- -;; - .S; C .- - (J <( III iii c ill ill Z Z o 0 o 0 Il.. Il.. l- l- ~ ~ N N o 0 o 0 N !:::! N "'" ..... ..- M M M ..... o M III C> ro a.. N o o N N N N N o o N N N N ~ c Q > iii <l> e! t!: ll) 0> > C C C. 0 rl U c ll) S! '" c U 0 a. C .c m Il.. ;: ..J 0 ~ III "'" r-- Ql M a.. Q ;; ~ (!) 0 N 0:: a lJ"l Z. ~ ~ ;.::: ,..... :;; Q-! "<:f ii M "<:f <( j. Pmellas County Property Appr~-~er InfohnatlOn. 1629 1605292008 000f) Page 2 of 5 16 / 29 / 16 I 05292 / 008 / 0080 2.8-Har-- 2.0 02 Jll'l Sl'llth, CI="A Plnellas County Property Appralser 17.2.7 10 Non-Resldentlal P rope rtlJ ~ddress, Use. and Sales COl'1parable sales value Prop Addr' 3004 GULF TO BAY SLUD baaed on hiatorlcal aalea Cenaus Tract 268.00 frol'l 1997 - 2000 0 Sale Date OR BooklPage Price (Qual/UnGl) Vac/Il'lp Plat Inforl'lation 3 11.981 [',440/ 81 130,000 (Q) I 1925, Boak 009 Pgs 043- 0 11,914 4, US/I. 145 75,000 (Q) I 0000, Book Pga - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 ( ) 0000 Soak Pga - 0 /0 0' 0 0 ( ) 2001 Value EXEMPTIONS Just/Market' 168,700 Homes tead , 0 Ownership X 000 HistorlC : 0 Use 1, .000 Assessed/Cap: 168,100 Tax Exel'1pt '.t .000 Other ExefTlp t ' 0 Taxable: 168.100 Agrlcultural 0 2001 Tax In forfTla t lon land InforfTlatlon Dlstrlct 'CY Seawall Frontage Clearwater Vlew' 01 Mi 11age ' 2.3.0975 land Size Unlt land land land Front x Depth Prlce Units Meth 01 Taxes 3.896 55 1) 0 x 0 6 00 12.,305.00 S Special Tax 00 2) 0 x 0 00 .00 3) 0 x 0 00 00 Wlthout the Save-Our-Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 00 cap, 2001 taxes would have 5) 0 x 0 .00 00 been 3.89[, 55 6) 0 x 0 .00 00 Without any exemptions, Total Land Value, 13.830 2001 taMes would have been' 3,.896.55 Short Legal BAY lJIEY CITY SUB BLK 8. LOTS 8.9,10 & 112 Descrlption lJAC A LLEY ON N LESS RD R/Y ON S Building Information Best Copy Available http //pao co pmellas fl us/htbmJcgl-scr3?o=1&a=1&b=1&c==1&r= 16&s==4&t=1&u=0&p= 3/28/2002 ~ . Pmellas County Property Appr~'<:er Information 1629 1605292008 O('of) Page 3 of 5 16 / 29 I 16 / 05292 I 008 / 0080 : 0-1 28-Har-ZOOZ JiM SMlth, CFA Plne11as County Property Appraiser 11:21 09 COMMerclal Card 01 of 1 IMproveMent Type, Rest/Lounge/DrLve-Ln Proper ty Addres~h 30 04 GU L f TO BAY B LIJD Prop Use, 3 Z 5 Land Use: Z 1 Structural Elements Foundatlon Floor SysteM Exterlor Wall Height Factor Party Wall Structural i="raM8 Roof i="raMe Roof Cover Cablnet &. Ml11 Floor Flnlsh Interlor F1n1sh Partition i="actor Spread/Hono footLng Slab on Orade Cone Block/Stucco o Hone Hasonry Pillar&Steel flat BULlt Up/Hetal/Gyps Average Carpet Comblnation Drywall o Heat1ng &. Alr Heating&Coollng Pckg i="lxtures 6. Bath T11e Electric Shape Factor Quall ty Year 8ullt Effective Age Other Depreciation i="unctlon Depreclatlon EconOM1C Depreclatlon floo r Only Average Square Average L 984 16. o o o Sub Areas Descrlptlon Factor Area De9crlptlon Factor Area 1) Bast" Area I 00 Z.14Z 7) 00 0 2) Open Porch 30 ZO 3) 00 0 3) .00 0 9) 00 0 4) .00 0 1 D) .00 0 5) 00 0 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) 00 0 Commercial Extra Features Descrlption D1Mens1ons Prlce Units Value RCD Year l) ASPHALT 1. 00 4,600 0 4,6.00 999, 2) fENC E 8. 50 Z10 0 1 , 24 0 1 . 9 84 3) . 00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE 5.840 Map With Property Address (non-vacant) ~~[t]OO~[gJ Be-st Copy Available http Ilpao co.pmellas fl uslhtbm/cgl-scr3?o=1&a=1&b=1&c=I&r= 16&s=4&t=1&u=0&p= 3/28/2002 Pmellas County Property Appr~'~er InfonnatIon 1629 16 05292 0080(\00') Page 4 of5 , l I c::J I ~ ~ L-ARK I ,'- m ODD OE C AOVt.rt AOV b , 323 3036 ~~ MEADOW CAROLl Ntt LARK AVE >l.AIt I .oJ .c '3 CAROL!INA AVENUE 2990 GULF" TO 3000 8 GULF TO , 407 N fI ADO ARK 7 33531 --~ 5frC ? 10 3004 GT~r -. 60 10 GL 2991 GULF" TO 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph http IIpao co pmellas fl us/htbm/cgl-scr3?0=1&a=1&b=l&c=1&r= 16&s=4&t=I&u=0&p= 3/28/2002 Pmellas County Property Appr~.<::er Informatlon 16 29 16 05292 008 OPo/) Page 5 of 5 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Parcel Information Back to Search Pa~ An explanatlOl1 of this screen ~~st Copy Available http Ilpao co pmellas f1 uslhtbm/cgl-scr3?o=1&a=l&b=1&c=1&r= 16&s=4&t=1&u=0&p= 3/28/2002 ~ C~I~ ~ u <ClG I --.J ~~ X --.J ~I_.....J, .... <::( 'P <C.. 03: [ z '(.0 LL@ ..J....u" X ~rn \ ~ \ W U Z Wr l!- f ~ (() n ,t2: XS' ~ 6' 6' .I ~.... '" 5: w z m 1-0:::: OO::J lw ::J U oC:: ~r-U i~~Z ,XOO :WUU @ x 6n ~'7 66, LfJ .q- '" '" Ii 0::: -.J 9 w i f-- ~ w 2: ~wCr li- Sf ;.<: l)i I ",\D '") A- ~ CCr 6- S::i. Xc0 Wo --.J ,0 Wm'O > (f) OLL 2 D::::"'Q L!J ::J ' I'" 'j 0:::: f-- <( -'i '0, 1V'1' c.j0.''----_.J \~ ~~1 "".J ~ l!o I 6'~, I' '0 I. I ..< lu.....J OJ \- I '8 /' - I 18~, I C') I : I I r6' e x L ,'-- (l I r J' fiF, ,~ .....:-0 \ -N '~=7 , <'9 :::.:: xu ,0 l 06',0 l 6" wSo 5\ ~ i v wmO ,'p Z > (f) 0l.J.... - ct.'$. :::20:::0 <' w~z ,.........) .q- O:::f-<( A N '-t- C-:: 'T, A- ,St z rn 1-0:: U::J I ::Ju g:UI ~z 00 ~UI I I bz " i I....... ~ c9>S~ 1/ -n ~ (,-r-'-/ I .........f"""'1 - I' .../' , / :< r\\ ..... ~ &--"'::.6_ \ ,2': l I:Q S -..- .1') ~ ::...""") G ,... , \~ !l:: -., , r " , z "...) to LfJ n N . OJ CO " ;-" , ;/"..().- ~ ~ .... <......... .... ..... ~ / r.. / ............: '\.>" ... .........../-.. :>................,.............. ~.... .... "'".. I~(""'" \.{ ..,"".... ....,' ~.... '\.~ /............. v ,..,....J ~.,..... :" ~ ... ^... .tv .A" ..; ~~( <<<; "',-, ~\~ y;~:- > ~.( ....~.... <.... ~ ,,"" ; ~ ... CI~ '; ~ ~ .....) v\ ~ ~ ,l... E <;.....(~....1 ~ "'::J-O~/ \ ~. r l\-........ ,":r X !", --t'V,.. .........(.'J.......... ...~~.,- y~ -9/ ,......:; ~ f J i.. 1'r:."1..J" I ~...~..." , <' .. - - ,. , ,. l , ' I ,z l :?-~ -I 1'6' -: I " I ' /k'"S~ 16' <9 -.:. V 201?; L : ,'. " ~ ~ " ,-, { 5: Ae ria 1 Map '-I, .... .. it- . CITY OF CLEARWATER. FLO PUBUC WOR RlDA KS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING <il ., Aerial Map ~ NDRTH 1"=200' THIS is NO'Il' fA GU!.V!"'f 'J>t /1 l} "'..../_ ., - "I .~ ~ '0 0(1-0 a .04- !:~tZ~~ CITY OF CLEARWATER. FLORIDA \~.'<J~,~l PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ~"''' 9 ENGINEERING ~ NORTH 1"=1320' THIS IS NOT A SUR.VEY Location Map Phaoe Thanh Nguyen 3006 Gulf to Bay Boulevard FL 02-02-04 " o o 3 '" ;; ... DREW Uu cZJUrn 0 0: rnrn ~ '" ~ ., " ;> e ., " m ~ ::> \oJ ~Oi~ ~/ \0~ct ,1111"",.'..... l.4SEA~",,__ /()~~... , "I,.. ,~ ~ n..... ~ ,r: 2'?- ~~ ::'~.\ ~ ~~ ~-~"'''ER ~~t/ -...."".",,,11". ClTY Of CLEARWATER, F'LORlDA PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING ~~\- \ 143 15'> " ~ 142 157 S8 ~ s.;;c 129 - - 1PJ.J)J~117 128 ~ 141 156 "'0- 118 127 131 140 159 '" 105 119 ~ I 126 132 139 160' 0 0 ~e1~ 104 120 12~ 133 138 161 .J:LI ~ LJ} 103 121 -- Q;~g 124 134 137 162 rr '" 102 1'22 123 153 r- 135 135 L.---- 59 &6 67 66 65 64 63 62 61 60 59 R elen loon Are" iC ~"""'V\1i"1 m'l%:l~~~i',q~4, ~ ~~ ~~ ;V~ <\ 0. ~- 1\ 41 / ~~ iZ '" '" C> '" '" '" 5250-~U S R 60 ,Cl;" Q" 101U11~ 202 /~ I~'<:'I ./' S,I-~" Vn">c.--::-. 103Z''204 I"'/' v ["'\.'/' \O~ I{,I:> "/I~()'1, /7(., ~ ~~~ "'l .r-:"", ~ r"v:- \0:.- ~ /~ "~~ ~'\ /0. 1070::: 20S ~ li~" ~ ~ 109@ 210 l ~~, 1;(;:111(212 a 1;:- [/ty 1;:<- \\1, ~~ ~ ~ 152 .,f~ X~; 117~, 216 ~ ",,~ ~2 :'l-~~ 119<{ 2\8 ~ <'<> Z 0',:/ /'" 1200::: 220 'i -1129 " ",,'? ~,,'C '1-":n 1'2 ~ ~ ~ ROGER<:I' ~ 1m EE -I !Up 'if g 29 '-.(lf17 120..:-'.-;Il1 I-li D1, l.IiL ~ 320 \, 319 / 123 222 225 g 2S/; 16 122 -- V 125 226 ~ ~ 821/ ~ 224 227 127 221> ~ QJ 15 [12/ 127 - / 129 230 i ....Ei- '$! EL'!:. - 226 ??Q 1.,,)<t;J n, ~ o ~ " Cl 06' cJ <:: C <:: ~ 1[ Vi (') z ~ '" Ct: g Cl '" t) o c- ::J :'> z <3 z ~ (() FLEXIBLE OWNER Phuoc Thanh Nguyen o A~<D 1;; ~ 1 1':;BAY VIEW '" ~ ~CJ1' ''''\~\';,~ '" ~ ~ '" '" ~1.J ;:0;;- ~ 'I~ol< 508 a "" 509 - ~ ~ ~~ 0M H P ~'1l:I_.~_16~ ~ <\ ~OF ~ 4") ~ 0 ~ kf ",0 611 BA Y\ 4-275 60S .0.\. $ 'V - 1;' <;,'0 Voc R/W VIEW ~~ 9'144-575 bOO o '" ..- B \ ~ IE w ,..-.,L ~ I r- W VA A J V, E ~ 225 ---- ~ W ] J.....-' 0:: ~ <( (I) ~ ~ "" ....J T 0 "....I-P <:> 227 CLE RWA ER ~ '" @ ~ ..,1r " , 30 Ii ,NE ~S'~ 40 ....... r.... 0'J t-.. ..... ~~ ~(; C; ci ~ t l~i!>~I f g <( @ @ ~ 30@ 40 <0> ~ '" '" '" ~ ;;; 0 '" '" " " g 3 '" '" '" CAROLINA :;: 4J7 ~ ~ g:: ~ t:: ~ ~ ;: N- 00 00 0 0<:> <:> W "'M ""'" '" "'''' '" 5 6 >- N C3 ;g 9-43 =- ) ,0 \1lg [ ~ 6S~-391l~~ ,<'!~ <D o If} 610 < 0:: ~ ::g < ~ o C\1 I CT.li)ZO ~ y 2. f;,01 ~ Z. 60S H6 o DEVELOPMENT ~ @r >- L l\l.t" D '" <( '<11:. 0. ,t {1J C'? ;!r II <> '" [ \~.J.i,.p KAPCK .., .., .., ... ... I- ... .., ... " " AVENUE ~ TRAVEL I- TRAILER C PARK 407 SlUE 1"...-.,. 4 1 VAL --.-/ ~ "I ' "''' ""'CO , <:> 50~ 60 0<>; "'''> " ~~ CD ~ " -'-t"> "''''' .1'\, -l~A '" S 0 0 R 60 .... '" GULF TO c "- C '" BAY o ,... 1 ~ 23 1~\':>~ o?~ \lo"l'.r<:\1. r.g, -;, '" J' '" o ~ "l '" o "" SO '" o ~ ~\ <g, B I" 'G (j~ '\ '" <:> <b REQUEST SITE. 3006 Gulf to Bay Boulevard CASE FL 02- 02- 04 PROPERTY SIZE (ACRES) 0 28 Best Copy v PIN 16129116/05292/008/0080 ATlAS PAGE 292A - ~ - ~ 127 131 140 159 c 11\1 126 132 1,39 160 e ~ -'" 120 c '" 125 133 138 161 '"~ ~ ,,<< 121 124 134 137 162 fr: ~ 122 123 135 136 163 L- ~ 7 66 55 5~ 63 62 61 60 59 ReI en lion Area 14/01 ,_ ~ '1,_ ~ j>....~ "'9.'~lAr'1fr... ! . /OS.3 14/06 CO?n ~ 1Tlerc'lctl S R 60 ~ )'3)t{O&~~~!... ~ ":: [J" ~ '1-~ ~I> IY~ 20J:J .1:", . :'l/G ~':> I 'O/rQ 105 206 I";:~'" 'l-,,)<;::r, - I/.:.<o I"~I / /-;\ l-<: 107 208 I~ 1/...':11/ IX ,0'0 I~ I~I/ tZ'~ \~~ ~~~ g I": l?1~ 1"-/ \\'1- 015 :.:'14 .j!J l/~ I /1'1..$} 1/.,,;;'-: z 1% 1/ >... IX \~A 117 216 ~. I'S- k 1-/ 1'1-~~ 1Hl 218 ~ I/~ 1 <'/ <~ I/~ 120 220 ~ .,-,.'0 I~':l.~ i:'''' 121 222 ~ ! :~..' 'C'~."\ ", 7'<~ ~ ~ : ;po:;-l 'X- r,.....,;J~.. I I ~~ttr~8 I lWl~' IX ~1:2t -'~1:~ 1 0 ;9';\; -) ':' ~""~, <( ;"'iiJ>~~I"( ~'\~ ,in ~ r 11~oJ ')rl.W?' ~ ",};,1 , ""-~i ,"'" il t",,~ ,:"'; ffIiJ~1j~~,J.~~~~~ ~-!,i!.n":li< l}~fl'::..r"-n-;:~"'J."..~ '~'" "~::; .IT ~NE SSEE'''-t~~~,;~.\d ~~ 'W'1l.. \;'~ ~,-,~.l<!.~IJ\ ~ ,pt.: I'J~ lr-!} 3 4 r-fJ" I r- r--LJ, .J, ;: :C~, s r- 6 g <( I~~~ntx) l ~ L 11 <<Y"g fli llit'y ~ W ~ <( OJ CAROUNA L ~ ~!liC es 1 6 10 19 w ~ VI 7 ~ 6 '--' 8 19 11 17 2 \2 ::t"-~ .1II1i~ 11:11 0 9 8 i 7 ! . ~-...... 23 22 21 CLE RW~ ER I 20 #/' " ~1'i- ...,",~ -"""" . :,-......\~ r~\.r I"'""i"'< T~'r'- ....l~ {^-/f~$f4~.... 'f!.~\iJ " ~ "t. h,,-W1i1 "Ir _"!o,~lrqENUE " ~tY'- ~" IfJ~ O\,.i!>lT--< "- (tot- J ",~.ff::!_.J;t..:t:"'~4 f t;.. ;~ ~'t"""\d ~.. "f.. 1. \,..C~ ~) I ~~~ ~_....~1 I {J'r/:: >f" I t-J11 ! t 'I': 7 \~~J "(- +'';,Mr..p d~i -"y"'l; '4 " ~I 7D ~ "fJi;,..~ );1\ ,~' ''l'3<<;; 3'4, "0., "~' 7 m.1'iI'IA/;S~~~ i"':i1 J_I~1f' -Ir.,?!..I~~~~ Ii "'" e..t~s.... "/I, ,'~"',. 1\";'1,_" ( ~Wo;.. '#(" ..., ~ ""_I f ," ~, r, 'Z. - ~ !lIj:l'i "~"" '1;'0" '" 'iA;:,\,*"".i!} _ 'C,~ c""-- 'Y1-~ 'i"'j~'71-l) THISISNOTA 1~ 'rP-_~.fil:^y.u....~ b' _'J,-$,r _I.t ~I SUA.\I'E'l" ..J] ..........~ ~ ~l .....4'~....,,~ .)~:,. -'t _ II<L -r--"I~..,..,..- ~t. .l<>-__ "'~ '""..tJ If _ t ~;~~ ~ly,,~ @ ~;'I ill, 'I""~~' 6 ~" " 'f'"~ H~' - ,", >- 231-'2/L.?\ 21' 20,f> 1 g 18''" ~'''" ~; ''''' ,&$" -- · '''~ t?t.......h '" 1 ~ 0:". ~,'d . ",.J:; d III ~~^''c 8i ~l..tt ~ rr ""~J>""" -'(4 '_,.,c/~' '" ':';J.I,'1- .I\...CI/i;;~ 'CG NifY<f.I f f!!' " ., ., ., I- ... I- ... .-, ... ., j,. AVENUE 7- 1 2 3 4 5 ~ 23/02 11: 10 8 r---" 1- 7 6 ., v~Ql S R 60 GULF TO BAY - ,& . .... to '1 '1 ~ 2 1 ~~ 1 ~'ln .3 ~, a I";] I~f"'" . '? 'c'Pi~,"", "-~ esir/; ..... -, 1 '"X' i ~\,.1.;~ti' J ll;~~ 11 . '-{lt~ 1.,;;_" 1 ~I~~~ ~ ROGERS STREET 2 17 120 - 12} 224 C e' ~ 0) / 123 222 225 ,,~~\- ~ 4 -f-- /' 125 226 <f ~~I~_~~;~~ ~~~I~ ~ -, 16 17 ~224 ."rzR "\ 1 .y)~ iQ ~ ,?-ot:>-U 227 127 228 ~ ,.14 ~"",h,i' '" r ~ &~~j, ;;1~1".Jt" ,1' '1.rF-t-J. 15 /' 127- V 129 230 I ~...., !J:Jr"'-.;. ~ I' ~ 1t I iN .... r::p0>A'0 Idv~' -, ,I - 226 ~ "'tI' t I '''!(t'f II; (i" r ". ~" <r'~ . ' 14 ,- 129_ 229 l}1 232 o<\...p (~rl"i ~ 'I:' J.r -'- V " ~~v... \{~~ l' ' \ - 228 18 234 ':to '-N <%:' ' ~/ 133 1U'..f",i,\ )cl 2 131 00;-- , ."" ---, 7 231 po, 236 .--.. ... <=> s (;; > gj " <: !J! .. ~ ~ c. o ;; ili a ",I ~ ~ <: .. ~ " z ~ fr: Cl Ei '" u o I- ::l <$ z <:l z !!J U) STATE OWNED TRACT A l\~ v 2@:r" 3 "!>\ '\ 1- :J '2- :J S , ,./ /J, EXISITING SURROUNDING USES OWNER Phuoc Thanh Nguyen CASE FL 02-02-04 SITE 3006 Gulf to Bay Boulevard I PROPERTY SIZE (ACRES) 028 PIN 16/29/16/05292/008/0080 ATLAS 292A PAGE LJ.. o Updated as of 3/14/02 u Note: Times are subject to chauge. ACTION AGENDA DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE March 14,2002 9.00 a m StafTRevlew 10:00 a.m. Case FL 02-02-06 - 1100 South Mlssoun A venue Ownerl Apphcant: The Clearwater Group, Ltd Locahon' 327 acres located on the west Side of South MISSOUTl Avenue approxunately 300 feet south of Dnud Road Atlas Page: 296A and 306A Zonmg' C, Commercial District Request: FleXible Development approval to allow attached dwellings III the Commercial Dlstnct as part of a ComprehenSive Infilt Redevelopment Project Pr_oposed Use. A 116-umt apartment complex as part of the Renaissance Square Apartment Complex III the CommerCial Dlstnct Presenter: Mark T Parry, Planner Attendees mcluded: City Staff' Mark Parry, Mike Gust, Tom Glenn, Wayne Wells, Don Melone, Lisa Fierce and Joe Colbert, ApphcantlRepresentattve: Ed Armstrong, Edward Mazur, Bob Hatfield, Ken Gibson The ORe reviewed these applicatIOns with the followmg comments' 1 Parks and Recreation a) RecreatIOn Land and Recreation FaCility Impact fees due for additIOnal reSidentIal uruts pnor to Issuance of blllldmg penruts or fmal plat whIchever 'comes first Open Space ill1pact fees do not apply slllce floor area of total developme_nt contmues to be Withm the 50% expansIOn threshold of prevIOus floor area (mall and theater) Contact Deb Richter 562-4817 2 Stormwater. a) No comment 3. Traffic enemeerine' a) Need site plan to Identify parcel hnes b) Need plat conSistent With site plan, mcludmg Idenhficahon of Parcels 2, 5A, 5B c) Need to clanfy handIcap access to garage elevators d) All parkmg per CIty Standards, show handIcap spaces as such e) All above comments to be addressed/danfied pnor 10 review by CDB t) Need FDOT mtent to pernut pnor to fu_st bUlldmg penrut DRC agenda - March 14 2002 - Page 1 11'15 a.m. DRAFT CONDITIONS, DEVELOPMENT ORDER . That all reqUirements oftlie Fue Department be met pnor to f1nalmspectlOn, .. That no adqlt10nal Slgnage be pemutted on Site, and · That no off-site advertlsmg be pemutled for the accessory uses associated with this apphcatlOn (FLS 02-02-16) Case. FL 02-02-04 - 3006 Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard Apphcant/Owner: Thanh Phuoc Nguyen Representative: Mr Patrick T Maguue, Esq LocatIOn' 0 28 acres located on the north side of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard, approximately 42 feet west of Meadow Lark Lane Atlas Page: 292A Zonmg C, Commercial Dlstnct Request: Flexible Development approval to reduce the reqUired number ofparkmg spaces from 15 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area (32 spaces) to 8 5 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area (18 spaces), reduce the fTOn! (south) setback from 25 feet to 3 6 feet to bUlldmg and 12 feet to pavement, reduce the SIde (west) setback from 10 feet to three feet to pavement, reduce the side (east) setback from 10 feet to zero feet to a dumpster enclosure and five feet to pavement, reduce the rear (north) setback from 20 fee! to 1 5 feet to pavement-and to permit duect access to a major artenal road (Gulf~to"Bay Boulevard), as a ComprehensJVe Infill Redevelopment Project under the proVISIOns of Sechon 2-704 With Comprehensive Landscape Program under the proVISions of SectIOn 3 -1202 Proposed Use: A restaurant Wlthm an eXIS!Iqg one-story 2,132 square foot masomy block bmldmg, Wlth access onto Gulf to Bay Boulevard Presenter' Wayne Wells, Senior PlaMer Attendees meluded. City Staff Mark Parry, Mike GuS!, Tom Glenn, Rick Albee, Don Melone, Lisa Fierce, EllIOtt Shoberg and Joe Colbert, Wayne Wells Applicant: Mr Patrick T MagUIre, Thanh Phuoc Nguyen The DRe reviewed these applications With the followmg comments' 1. Parks and Recreation a) No Comments 2 Stormwater: a) No Comments 3 Traffic enl!lDeerinl!: a) All parkmg, lIlcludmg handIcap per Cuy Standards pnor to the Issuance ofa CertIficate of Occupancy 4 General enl!meerml!: a) Back flow preventor deVice to be II1stalled pnor to I~suance of any permits DRC agenda - March 14, 2002 - Page 4 5. Planmnl!: a) The sIte .J table on Sheet C3 1 of the sIte plan must be. ~nded as follows a The eXlstmg and proposed bUlldmg coverage should be 1727%, not 1743%, · The reqUired FAR IS 0 55, not 040, · It appears that eXlStmg paved velucular use area IS bemg removed to proVIde more overall open ,space and mtenor landscapmg However, the proVided paved vehicular use area IS greater than the eXlstmg"paved vehicular use area Please check your calculalions and reVIse accordmgly (mcludmg proposed paved vehIcular use area If necessary), · The eXlstmg nnpervIOtlS surface and open space square footage and percentage of the gross site do not add up to the gross SIte area (when addmg appropnate numbers) (see also above comment), · Confirm the eXlstmg and proposed parkmg lot mtenor landscapmg square footage and percentage of the vehicular use area calculatIOns, · The requned number ofparkmg spaces IS 32 spaces, and · The parkmg calculatIOns should be based 011 18 spaces bemg proVided, which produces a parkmg raM ~sed of 8823 spaces per 1,000 square feet oLgross floor area, b) The site plan must be clanfied as to whether the eXlstmg asphalt or turf block IS beIng removed from the locatIons adjacent to the lO-mch, 13-mch and IS-melI oak trees, wluch are not bemg shown or calculated as parkmg spaces If these areas are to become landscaped areas, please mdlcate that curbmg or other measures acceptable to Code to ensure non-encroachment by velncles mto these areas, c) If pavement (asphalt or turf block) IS bemg removed from these areas, ensure that the site data reflects such, d) DimenSIOn the Width of the landscape buffer area on the west and east Sides ofthe site e) All slgnage must be subnntled pnor to COB reView, -'=7 f) Parkmg study to be provlded pIlor to CDB reView, g) PrOVide site mformatlOn mcludmg number of employees, dchvery tImes, etc h) ProVide bUlldmg elevatIOns pnor to CDB reView, Lk.. tVC 6 'f I) All of the above (a -1) must be done pIlor to the COB review Sf It 01...1.1,..."..): rJlr&flfI/~ Solid_waste. uU a) Applicant Will commIt to a mamtammg the eXIstmg two yard dumpster - Solid Waste agrees Should the dumpster be upgraded 10 a larger dumpster then a new enclosure and pad WIll be reqUired Land resource: a) Should a new dumpster pad be lllstalled the eXlstmg turfblock Will need to be removed by hand 6. 7. 8. Fire' a) No Comments 9. LandscaUIOl!:: a) No comments NOTES: o ReVIsed sHe plans to be resubmitted to Staff by March 19, 2002 IJ CDB date Apnl 16, 2002 . Fax comments to Patnck Maguire at 727-446-3741 or emaJl to pma2:U1rela1tampabay IT com, emall to Housh Ghovaee a! nesadmlll@mllld~prlllg com Best Copy Available DRC agenda - March 14, 2002 - Page 5 " DRAFT CONDITIONS' DEVELOPMENT ORDER · That all parkIng spaces, mcludmg handlcap, meet all C1ty Standards pnor to the Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, o Should a new dumpster pad be Installed the eXlstmg turf block WIll need to be removed by hand, · Apphcant \vlll corrumt to a mamtammg the eXlstmg two yard dumpster - SolId Waste agrees Should the dumpster be upgraded to a larger dumpster then a new enclosure and pad WIll be reqUITed Case: FLS 02-02-15 - 2575 Gulft~ay Boulevard ApplIcant: Sam's Wholesale C!J,W Representative: Mr Jas~'CMillan T;~~:: 20 9-acr7ated on the southwest comer of GUlfLto Bay Boulevard-and U S HIghway Atlas Page' 39-913' Zonmg: CrCommerclal DIstrict Reques?Flexlble Standard Development approval to perno an automotlVe service statIOn Wlthm tl;v6mmerclal Dlstnct and to reduce the requued !'r!oCg f?T a retml sales/service estabh~hment _ om five spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross).loor area (676 spaces) to 472 spaces per /,000 square feet of gross floor area (638 spaces), under the provlSlons of SectIOn 2-703 L Proposed Use. The applicatIOn m':!9des the establishment of a SIX Island, l;'-pump automotive service 5t.ltlOn With a 7].-squarc foot attendant booth Presenter: Mark T Parry, Planner/ Attendees mcluded / ~;;.~~!::o~~;iE:;~E::l- M Alb". 7Wdb. ODD MdoD'."" The DRC reviewed theSCJP~tlOns With the followmg comments:/" 1 Parks and Recreation / /a) No comments 2. Stormwater" / a) Stonnwater Cales requrred pnor to the Issuance ofa Development Order, /:3. Traffic en2meerml!" / a) No comments ~ 4. General ene:meerml!.' L._ a) Water roam to be' relocated 5 ft from any structures, tanks, efc ReVise SIte plans pnor to Issuance of a g{velopment Order ./ S. PI.anmnl!: // ./ ._ a) Clanf}/slgnage 'WIth thiS development pnor to the Issuance of a ~velopment.order b) Add,note to site plan that bUlldmg IS an eqUipment room only,..tunmanned statIon) pnor to the'\ssuance of a Development Order /' ," /' c) /EJevatlOlls reqUIred showmg the proposed structure Will match the cololU and architecture ." I oft,!:Ie'exlstmg Sam's Club bUlldmg/ 6. SolId waste. / " " a) Clanfy how solid waste Will be handled pnor to the Issuance of a Development Order -:/" Land resource' / / a) The 5 5" elm at the NE corner and the 55" Laurel Oak at the SW corner are declmmg and :~;~::at~: remove/d SubmIt for tree removal pernot at time of bzUlldmg perrmt 8 }<'Ire: a) Must meet Fire 50Cle reqUirements for ServIce StatiOns as per NFP~ and NFPA J pnor to'final mspectlOn for C 0 ,/ b) Fm' suppres'on system for each pump wlll be reqUired pnor toAlnal inspectIon for C 0 9. Landsca~ 12 00 a.m. Best Copy DRCagenda-March 14,2002 - Page 6A vallable .- -, o hle;arwater , 0 .. Revised 4/16/02 LL >- ..... u AGENDA COM:MUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD Date: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 Time: 2 00 pm Place: 112 South Osceola Street, 3rd Floor, Cleanvater, Flonda, .33756 (City Hall Commission Chambers) The CIty of Clearwater strongly supports and fully complies with the AmerIcans with DIsabilIties Aet (ADA) Please advIse us at least 72 hours prior to the meetIng If you reqUire specIal accol1}I110datlOl1S Assisted hstemng devices are aVailable Kmdly Iefram from usmg beepers, cellular telephones and other dIstractmg deVIces durmg the meetmg Flonda Statue 286 0105 states Any person appealmg a decIsion of 111lS Board must have a record of the proceedmg') to support such appeal If you have que':>tiOn':> or concerns about a case, please contact the staff presenter from the Planmng Department lIsted at the end of <each agenda ltem at 727-562-4567 CALL TO ORDER, INVOCATION, PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL Vlce-ChaJr Petersen Doran Gtldersleeve Hooper Moran Mazur PlIska Alternate member CIty Staff A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING: March 19, 2002 ro R ;Jp"enofl - 4/1 n!n? - Pfj tip I B. CONSENT AGE~ :\: The followmg cases are not con .-:d by the applicant, staff, nelghbonng property owner, ete and will be approved by smgle vote at the begITU1mg of the meetmg (Items I -x) 1. Case: ANX 02-02.,,02 - 7 South Hanlpton Road Level Three ApplicatlOlt Owners/Apphcapt: Robert G Gabnel & Margaret A Gabnel, Williams C Caruthers & Mary K CarutheIs, LIll1itea PropertIes, Ine /Janies F Burns, Joseph J Sorota, Jr TIustee of FlOrida Land Trust #172916/Brandon Realty Venture, loe Location: 3 91 acres located on the east side of Hampton Road, approximately 270 feet north of Gulf-to- Bay Boulevard Atlas Page: '291B Req nest: AnnexatIon of 3 91 acres to the CIty of Clearwater (Land Use Ph~n amendment and Rezonmg'pendmg case #LUZ 02-02-02 ) Presenter: Ehm Udoh, Sel1lor Planner 2. Case: LUZ 02-02-02 - 7 South Hampton Roa'd Level Three AppltcatioJl Owners/Applicant: Robert G Gabnel & Margaret A Gabnel, WIllIams C Caruthers &, Mary K Caruthers, Llll)Ited PropertIes, lI'lc Ijames F Bums, Joseph J Sorota, Jr Trustee ofFL Land Trust #172916 and Carol D Allen, Trustee of Carol 0 Allen/Brandon Realty Venture, lnc Location: 422 acres located oJ.1 the east side of Hampton Road, approximately 270 feet north of Gulf-to- Bay Boulevard Atlas Page: 291B Request: (a) Land Use Plan amendment from RU, ResldentmfUrban ClassLfieatlOn to RiOL, Res!denhallOffice Limited (pendmg case # ANX 02-02-02), and (b) Rezonmg fTom R-R, Rural ResldentIaI & A-E, Agncultural Estate ReSidential DIstncts (County) and LMDR, Low DenSity Resldenhal Dlstnct (CIty) to 0, Office (pendmg case # ANX 02-02-02) Presenter: Etlm Udoh, Semor PI3Imer 3. Case: FL 02-02-06 - 1100 South Mlssoun Avenue Level Two ApplicatlOll Owner/Applicant. The Clearwater Group, Ltd Location: 7 155 acres total mcIudmg 3 59 acres located on the southwest comer of Dnlld Road and South Mlssoun Avenue (proposed Parcel 5) and 3 56 acres located on the west side of South MiSSOun Avenue, approxImately 1,100 feet south of DrUId Road (proposed Parcels 1, 3 and 4) Atlas Pages: 296A and 306A Zoning: C, Commercial Distnct Request: Amendment to a previously approved FleXIble Development applIcatIOn (FL 01-01-05) to decrease the number of reSIdential umts from 156 to 116 umts on Parcel 4, mQrease the grQss floor area of non-residenhal use from 15,602 square feet to 54,684 square feet (Parcel one to be lImited to 5,602 square feet and Parcel 5 to be lImIted to 49,082 square feet), replace a 2,500 square foot clubhouse/42~spa~e parkmg lot WIth 49 Qarkmg spaces on Parcel 3, replace a 52,236 square foot, 48-urut bUIldmg With a 6,300 square foot commercIal bUlldmg and a portion of a 4,050 square foot commercIal bmlrlmg on Parcel 5, combme Parcels 2, 5 and 5A mto a umfied Parcel 5 (consIstmg of Lots 7, 8, 9 and 10), and. combme Parcels 4 and 4A mto umfied Parcel 4 Proposed Use: A 116-urht apartment complex With five commercial bUlldmgs totalIng 49,674 square feet, III the Commerclal DIstnct Presenter: Mark T Parry, Planner rOR BPenrlB - 4/1 fi!02 - P<lp"e ? ',.,~e~st Copy Available C. REQUESTS FOR )NTJNUANCES: I Case: ANX 02-02-03 - 25633 US 19 North To be continued to May 21,2002 Owner/Applicant: Lawrence H Dimmitt, III Agent: Harry S Clme EsquITe LocatIOn: I 04 acres located on the ea;;t side of U S 19 North and '>vest of Lake Chautauqua and north of FHSt Avenue North Atlas Page 233A Request: (a) AnnexatIOn of 1 04 acres to the City of Clearwater (b) Land Use Plan amendment from R10/R, ResldentJal/OfficelRetall (County) to R10/R, Residential/Office/Retail (City), ctnd (c) Rezomng from CP-I, CommercIal Parkway Dlstnct (County) to C, Commercial Dlstnct (Clearwater) Presenter: EtIm Udoh, Semor Planner 2. Case: ANX 02-02-04 - 2301 Chautauqua Avenue (Proposed) To he cOIl/wued to May 21,2002 Owner/ Applicant: Lawrence H Dimmitt, III & Larry H Dmlll11tt, J r Agent: Harry S Cline EsqUIre LocatIOn: 23 0 acres located on the east SIde of Chautauqua Avenue and west of Lake Chautauqua, approxImately 700 feet east ofU S 19 North Atlas Pages 233A & 244A Request: AnnexatIOn of 23 0 acres to the City of Clearwater (Land Use Plan amendment and Rezomng pendmg # LUZ 02-02-02 ) Presenter: Etm:. Udoh, Semor Planner 3. Case: LUZ 02-02-03 - 2301 Chautauqua Avenue (Proposed) To he continued to May 21,2002 Owner/Applicant: Lawrence H DmlTI1ltt, III & Larry H DImmItt,Ir ..;\.gent: Harry S Clme, EsqUIre Location: 230 acres located on the east Side of Chautauqua Avenue and west of Lake Chautauqua Avenue, approxImately 700 feet east ofU S 19 North Atlas Pages: 233A & 244A Request: (a) Land Use Plan amendment from RS, ResIdentlal Suburban & P, PreservatIOn (Coqnty) to RD, Resldentlal Urban and P, PreservatIon (CIty) (Pendmg Case # ANX 02-02-04), and (b) Rezomng from R-R, Rural Resldentlal DIstnct (County) to LMDR, Low Medium DenSity ReSidential & P, PreservatIOn Dlstncts (CIty) (Pendmg Case # ANX 02-02- 04) Presenter: EtIm Udoh, Semor,Planner ~,-~ - ''''to ,.1. J?!~ 0 py ~ 111 E>::s. ~ ~ J{~vailable ('DR fll'ennfl - 4/ I ()/02 - Pwe 1 4. Case. FL 02-02-0:; i. 8 Glendale Street To be COlltllllled I ay 21,2002 Apphcant: Mr Scott OgIlvie Location: 0 1 Q-acres located on the north sIde of Glendale, Street, approximately 150 feet west of Manda lay Avenue Atlas Page: 258A Zoning rvnIDR, MedIUm High DenSity ResIdential DIstnct Request: FlexIble Development approval to reduce the reqUIred front (south) setback from 25 feet to 1 6 feet (to deck) along Glendale Street and to reduce the sIde (west) setback frbm 10 feet to I 9 feet (to deck), as a Residential lnfill Project under the provIsIOns of SectIon 2-404 Proposed Use: A 264 square [oat wood deck as accessory to an eXIstmg smgle-[almly dwelhng Presenter: Wayne Wells, SCl1Ior Planner Be~st Copy Available D. NON-CONSENT AGENDA: (Item 1) 1. Case: FL 02-02-04 - 3006 Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard Level Two AppIicatlO1l Applicant/Owner: Thanh Phuoc Nguyen Representative: Mr Patnck T MagUIre, EsquITe Location: 028 acres located on the north SIde of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard, approximately 100 feet east of BaYVIew Avenue Atlas Page: 292A Zoning: C, Commercial DIstnct Request: FlexIble Development approval to reduce the reqUIred number of p~rkmg spaces rroh1l5 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area (32 spaces) to 85 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area (18 spaces), reduce the front (south) setback along Gulfto Bay Boulevard from 25 feet to 36 feet to bm1dmg and 12 feet to pavement, reduce the SIde (west) setback from 10 feet to three feet to pavement, reduce the SIde ( east) setback from 10 feet to zero feet to a dumpster enclosure ~nd five feet to pa vemen t, reduce the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to 1 5 feet to pavement and to penmt dIrect access to a major artenal road (Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard), as a ComprehenSIve Infill Redevelopment Project under the proVISIOns of SectIon 2-704 wIth ComprehenSIve Lanoscape Program under the provISIOns of SectIon 3-1202 Proposed Use: A restaurant wlthm an eXIstmg one-story 2,132 square foot masonry block bUIldmg, with access onto Gulf to Bay Boulevard Presenter: Wayne Wells, Semor Planner B. CONTINUED ITEMS: (Item 1) 1. Case: T A 02-01-01 - Commumty Development Code Amendments A p plican t: Cl ty 0 f C1 earwater, P] ann 1 n g Dcpartm ent (' f) R flgenrln - 41 I olO? - PflPP 4 , .do Request: Comprel ,lve amendments to the Commumty 1 Jopment Code, as a result of the arumal reVIew, mclu_dmg amendments to the General ProvIsions, Zonmg DistrIcts, Development Standards, Development Review and other Procedures, Nonconfomllty ProVISIons, Enforcement Proceedmgs and PenaltIes and DefimtJons and Rules of ConstmctlOll Presenter: RIchard Kephart, Semer Planher 1. B~ ~i>>t Copy Available' F. DIRECTORrS ITEMS: ElectIon of officers - ChaIr and Vlce-ChmrpersQlls G. ADJOURNMENT S IPlalllllng DepanmemlC D Blngendas DRC & CD8\CDB12002\04 . APRiL \CDB Apnl16 2002 doc (' I1R :;J lJf'nrlfl - 4/1 ('!O? - PfllJe 'i ~ Clearwater u ReVIsed 4/8/02 AGENDA CO~UNITYDEVELOPMENTBOARD Date: Tuesday, Apn116, 2002 Time: 2 00 pm Place: 112 South Osceola Street, 3rd Floor, Clearwater, Flonda, 33756 (CIty Hall Corrurusslon Chambers) The City of Clearwater strongly supports and fully complIes WIth the Amencans with DisabilIties Act (ADA) Please advIse us at least 72 hours poor to the meetmg If you reqUlre specIal accommodatIOns Assisted hstenmg devices are avaIlable Kmdly refraIn from usmg beepers, cellular telephones and other dIstractmg devIces dunng the meetmg Flonda Statue 2860105 states Any person appealmg a decIsion of thIS Board must have a record of rhe proceedmgs to support such appeal If you have questions or concerns about a case, please contact the staff presenter flOm the Plannmg Department listed at the end of each agenda Item at 727-562-4567 CALL TO ORDER, INVOCATION, PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CAlL VIce-Chair Petersen Doran GIl del sleeve Hooper Moran Mazm PlIsko Alternate membel CIty Staff A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING: March 19,2002 CDB agend.. - 4/16/02,- Page 1 B. CONTINUED ITE ..: (Item I) 1. Case: T A 02-01-01 - Commumty Development Code Amendments Applicant: City of Clearwater, Planmng Department Request: Comprehensive amendments tb the Commumty Development Code, as a result of the annual reVIew, mcludmg amendments to the General ProvIsIOns, Zonmg DIstncts, Development Standards, Development RevIew and other Procedures, Nonconformity ProvIsIons, Enforcement Proceedmgs and PenaltIes and DefImtlOns and Rules of Con structI on Presenter: RIchIud Kephart, Semor Planner c. Be-sf C@py Available LEVEL 3 APPLICATIONS: (Items 1-5) 1. Case: ANX 02-02-02 - 7 South Hampton Road Owners/Applicant: Robert G Gabnel & Margaret A Gabnel, WIllIams e Caruthers & Mary K Caruthers, LImited PropertIes, lnc Ijames F Burns, Joseph J Sorota, Jr Trustee at FlOrida Land Trust #1 72916/Brandon Re~lty Venture, Inc Location: 391 acres located on the east SIde of Hampton Road, approximately 270 feet north of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard A tlas Page: 291 B Request: AnnexatIOn of 391 acres to the CIty of Clearwater (Land Use Plan amendment and Rezonmg pendmg case #LUZ 02-02-02 ) Presenter: EtJm Udoh, Semor Planner 2. Case: LUZ 02-02-02 -7 South Hampton Road Owners/Applicant: Robert G Gabnel & Ma,rgaret A Gabnel, WIllIams C Caruthers & Mary K Caruthers, LImIted PropertIes, lnc Ijames F Burns, Joseph J Sorota, Jf TiUstee of FL Land Trust #172916 and Carol D Allen, Trustee of Carol D AllenlBrandon Realty Venture,lnc Location: 422 acres located on the east Side of Hampton Road, approxImately 270 feet nOl1h of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard Atlas Page: 291B Req uest: (a) Land Use Plan amendment from RD, ResidentIal Urban ClaSSIfIcatIon to RlOL, Residential/Office LImited (pend]ng case # ANX 02-02-02), and (b) Rezomng from R-R, Rural ReSidential & A-E, Agncultural Estate ResidentIal Dlstnc;ts (County) and LMDR, Low DenSity Residential DIstnct (CIty) to 0, Office (pendmg case # ANX 02-02-02) Presenter: EtIm Udoh, Semor Planner CDS agenda - 4/16/02 - Page 2 .. 3. Case: ANX 02-02-03 - 25633 US 19 North To be continued to May 21,2002 Owner/Applicant: Lawrence H DImmItt, III Agent: Harry S Cline Esqqlre Location: 1 04 acres located on the east side of US 19 North and west of Lake Chautauqua and north of FlfSt A venue North Atlas P~ge 233A Request: (a) AnnexatiOn of 1 04 acres to the City of Clearwater (b) Land Use Plan amendment from R/O/R, ResIdentIal/Office/RetaIl (County) to R/O/R, ResldentIaI/Offlce/RetaIi (Oty), and (c) Rezonmg from CP-[, CommerC)al Parkway Dlstnct (County) to C, CommercIal Dlstnct (Clearwater) Presenter: EtIm Udoh, Semor Planner 4. Case: ANX 02-02-04 - 2301 Chautauqua Avenue (Proposed) To be continued to May 21,2002 Owner/Applicant: Lawrence H Dll111111tt, ill & Larry H DIffilll1tt, Jr Agent: Harry S Clme EsqUIre LocatIOn: 230 acres located on the east SIde of Chautauqua Avenue and west of Lake Chaut~uqua, approximately 700 f~et ea~t ofD S 19 North Atlas Pages 233A & 244A Request: Annexat10n of 230 acres to the CIty of Clearwater (Land Use Plan amendmenl and Rezomng penc!mg # LUZ 02-02-02 ) Presenter: EtIffi Udoh, Semor Planner 5. Case: LUZ 02-02-03 - 2301 Chautauqua Avenue (Proposed) To be continued to May 2~, 2002, Owner/Applicant: Lawrence H Dimmitt, ill & Larry H DImmItt, Jr Agent: HatTy S Cline EsqUire Location: 23 0 acres located on the east Side of Chautauqua A venue and west of Lake Chautauqua Avenue, approxImately 700 feet east of U S 19 North Atlas>Pag~s: 233A & 244A Request: (a) Land Use Plan amendment from RS, ReSIdentIal Suburban & P, PreservatIon (County) to RD, ReSIdential Urban and P, PreservatIOn (CIty) (Pendmg Case # ANX 02-02-04), and (b). Rezomng from R-R, Rural ReSidentIal Dlstnct (County) to LMDR, Low MedlUm DenSity ReSidentIal & P, PreservatlOn Dlstncts (CIty) (pendmg Case # ANX 02-02- 04) Presenter: Ettm Udoh, Semor Planner CDB agenda - 4/16/02 - Page 3 D. LEVEL 2 APPLICATIONS: (Items 1-3) 1. Case: FL 02-02-06 - 1100 South Mlssoun Avenue Owner/A.pplicant: The Clearwater Group, Ltd Location: 7 155 acres total 1 hc1 udIng 3 59 acres located on the southwest comer of DrUId Road and South Mtssoun Avenue (proposed Parcel 5) and 356 acres 'located on the west slqe of South MIssoun Avenue, approxImately 1,100 feet south of DrUId Road (proposed Parcels 1, 3 and 4) Atlas Pages: 296A and 306A Zoning: C, Commercial Dlstnct Request: Amendment to a prevIOusly approved FlexIble Development apphcatlOn (FL 01-01-05) to decrease the number of reSidential umts from 156 to 116 umts on Parcel '4, Increase the gross floor area of non-reSIdential use from 15,602 square feet to 54,684 square feet (Parcel one to be lImited to 5,602 square feet and Parcel 5 to be limited to 49,082 square feet), replace a 2,500 square foot c1ubhouse/42-space parkIng ]ot with 49 parkIng spaces on Parcel 3, replace a 52,236 square foot, 48-umt bUIldIng WIth a 6,300 square foot commercIal bUIldlOg and a portIOn of a 4,050 square foot commercIal bUIldlOg on Parcel 5, combIne Parcels 2, 5 and 5A mto a umfled Parcel 5 (consIstmg of Lots 7,8,9 and 10), and combme Parcels 4 and 4A mto umfled Parcel 4 Proposed Use: A 116-umt apartment complex WIth fIve commercIal bUlldmgs totalIng 49,674 square feet, In the CommercIal Dlstnct Presenter: MaJk T Parry, Planner 2. Case: FL 02-02-04 - 3006 Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard Applicant/Owner: Thanh Phuoc Nguyen Representative: Mr Patnck T MagUire, EsqUIre LocatIOn: 028 acres located on the north SIde of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard, approxnnately 100 feet east of BayvIew Avenue Atlas Page: 292A Zoning: C, CommerCIal DIstnct Request: FleXible Development approval to reduce the reqUIred number of parkIng spaces from 15 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area (32 spaces) to 8 5 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area (18 spaces), reduce the front (south) setback along Gulf to Bay Boulevard from 25 feet to 3 6 feet to bUlldmg and 12 feet to pavement, reduce the Side (west) setback from 10 feet to three feet to pavement, reduce the Side (east) setback from 10 feet to zero feet to a dllmpster enclosure and five feet to pavement, reduce the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to 1 5 feet to pavement and to penmt direct access to a major artenal road (Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard), as a ComprehenslVe Inflll Redevelopment Project under the proVISIOns of SectIOn 2-704 WIth ComprehensIve Landscape Program under the proVISIOns of Section 3-1202 Proposed Use: A restaurant wIthm an eXlstmg one-story 2,132 square foot masonry block bUIldmg, With access onto Gulf to Bay Boulevard Presenter: Wayne Wells, Semor Planner CDB agenda - 4/16/02 - Page 4 3. Case: FL 02-02-03 - 18 Glendale Street To be conhnued to May 21,2002 Applicant: Mr Scott OgIlvIe Location: 0 lO-acres located on the north SIde of Glendale Street, approxImately 150 feet west of Mandalay A venue Atlas Page: 258A Zoning: MHDR, MedIUm HIgh Denslty Resldentlal Dlstnct Request: Flexlble Development approval to reduce the reqUIred front (south) setback from 25 feet to 1 6 feet (to deck) along Glendale Street and to reduce the SIde (west) setback from 10 feet to 1 9 feet (to deck), as a ResIdentIal Inflll Project under the provlslons of SectIon 2-404 Proposed Use: A 264 square foot wood deck as accessory to an eXlstmg smgle-famtly dwellIng Presenter: Wayne Wells, Sentor Planner F. DIRECTOR'S ITEMS: ElectIOn of officers - Chalf and Vlce-Chmrpersons G. ADJOURNMENT S \PlalUllllg Departme,,^C D B'vIgendm, DRC & CD/!\CDlNOO'NJ4 . APR/L\CDB April /6, 2002 doc CDB agenda - 4/16/02 - Page 5 ~ ", ...... f.l'il ~~~l~"" ~1e1i ~~I-\ OF rl!(A~ ,,\~,"""~~1.A~ lW~\~ I ~(..&-'':J. ,i..TIf"~~,~, 1/ ;. 'ill l'l ~;:--~- ~~q "" ,,::-=..- !::l ~~'=::-- ~J" ~~;,.---==- ,'~~ "'::rl;;~D"i<'f~"''' "'<1n~~~~1i CITY OF CLEARWATER PIANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUilDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLFARWATER, FLORlDA 33756 Tr:LEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562.4576 loNG RANGE PlANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Apnl 26, 2002 Mr Pa(l)ck T MagUIre, EsqUIre 1253 Park Street CleaIWater, FL 33756 RE Development Order regardmg Case FL 02-02-04 - 3006 Gulf to Bay Boulevard Dear Mr Maglllre ThIS letter constItutes a Development Order pursuant to Sechon 4-206D 6 of the Commumty Development Oode On Apnl 16, 2002, the CommunIty Development Board revIewed your apphcatlOn to reduce the requIred number ofparlang spaces from 15 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area (32 spaces) to 844 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area (18 spaces), reduce the front (south) setback from 25 feet to 36 feet to bUlldmg (exlstmg) and 12 feet to pavement (cxlstmg), reduce the sIde (west) setback from 10 feet to three feet to pavement (exIstmg), reduce the sIde (east) setback from 10 feet to zero feet to a dumpster enclosure (existing) and five feet to pavement (exIstmg), reduce the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to 1 5 feet to pavement (existmg) and to permit duect access to a major artenal road (Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard), as a ComprehenSive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provISions ofSechon 2- 704 wIth a ComprehenSive Landscape Program under the provlslOns of SectlOll 3-1202 The proposal IS for a restaurant wlthm an eXlstmg one-story, 2, 132 square~foot masonry block bUlldmg, with access onto Gulf to Bay Boulevard Based on the apphcatlOn and the staff recommendatIOn, the Commumty Development Board APPROVED the applicatlOn wIth the followmg bases and 'condltlOns Bases for Approval 1 The proposal complIes with the FleXible Development cnterw as a ComprehenSive Infill Redevelopment ProJect"per SectlOn 2-704 B 2 The proposal complies wlth the FleXIble Development cntena as a ComprehenSIve Landscape Program under the proVISIOns ofSectlOn 3-1202 G 3 The proposal IS m compliance with other standards In the Code mcludmg the General ApplicabIlity Cntena per SectlOn 3-913 4 The development IS compatIble wIth the surroundmg area and WIll enhance other redevelopment efforts BRIAN J AUNGS1, MAYOR COMMISSIONFR I'D KARl, VICE MAYOR"COMMIS5IONFR WlIll NEY GRAY, COMMl5.SIONER HoYT HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER * BILL JONSON, COMMlSSIONFR "EQUAL [MPLOYMeNT AND AFFIRMATI\'I ACTION EMPLOYER" --<< Apnl 26, 2002 MagUIre - Page 2 CondItIOns of Approval 1 That a bus mess plan outlmmg the operatIOn of the proposed restaurant user With the maXImum number of employees on the largest Shlft, the hours of operatIon, delIvery hours, parkmg demand, etc be submltted to the Plannmg Department and be approved, pnor to Issuance of any perrmts or lIcenses, 2 That any change m the type of restaurant be evaluated for comphmentary opeiatlOnal charactenstIc and parkmg demand, and may reqUIre approval by the Commumty Development Board, 3 That the bUIldmg appearance be mlproved WIth the use of wmdows, pamt and awmngs, acceptable to the Planmng Department, 4 That any upgrade to a dumpster larger than two yards WIll reqUITe a new pad and enclosure, and any upgrade to the dumpster IS to be,done WIthout removmg any parkmg spaces" and 5 That all site and extenor bUlldmg Improvements be made to the satisfactIOn of staff, pnor to the Issuance of any hcenses or Certificate 01 Occupancy Pursuant to SectIOn 4-407, an apphcatIon for a bUlldmg permit shall be made wlthm one year of Flexible Development approval (Apnl 16, 2003) All reqUIfed certIficates of occupancy shall be obtamed wlthm one year of the date of issuance of the bUlldmg permIt Time frames do not change With succeSSIVe owners The Cornmumty Development Board may grant an extensIOn of tlme for a penod not to exceed one year and only wlthm the ongmal penod ofvahdlty Please be aware that the Issuance oftlns Development Order does not relIeve you of the necessIty to obtam any bUlldlllg permIts or pay any nnp,act fees that may be reqUIred In order to facilitate the Issuance of any permit or lIcense affected by tlus approval, please bnng a copy of thIS letter With you when applymg for any perrmts or licenses that reqmre thIS prIor development approval In additIon, please be aware that an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexlble Development) may be IrutIated by a property owner abuttmg the property which IS the subJect of the approval 'flthm 14 days of the date of the CDB deCISIOn The fihng of an apphcahonlnotlce of appeal shall stay the effect of the deelSlon pendmg the final determmatlon of the case The appeal penad for your case wIll expIre on Apnl 30, 2002 If you have any questIOns, please do not heSitate to call Wayne M Wells, AICP, Semor Planner, at 727~562-4504 Cynthta H Tarapam, AICP Plannmg Director Cc !vIr Phuoc Thanh Nguyen, property owner S IPlannmg DeparlmellllC D B\Flall",wcllve Or FlTllshed ApphcallonslGulfto Bay 3006 n,tlllh reS/III/rant - 4pprovedlGIIlf 10 Bny 3006 Development Order doc To: City of Clearwater Community Development Board ~ (['", rc; G ~J ~~ f\\\' ~D leD:I~\\\\\ \ \\ \G1PR 0 Ii 11101 \2;\ ~J u .---- -, \ ------ ~\ \ pV~ ' ~ _.---- \ - -' --.---- ---- Date' April 3, 2002 From. Thomas & Barbara Maas 3004 Carolina Ave Clearwater, Fl. 33759 L~ Ref Pubhc Heanng April 16, 2002 Item #2 (enclosed) This is to notify the Community Development Board of our obJection to the proposed reduction of parking spaces for the Nguyen's Restaurant. Overflow parking from the Wilder Center is already creating a burden on the homes fronting Carolina Ave. Granting tlns request to allow another business to have inadequate parking will only increase the parking problem in this area If the Board grants tlns request for the Nguyen's it would be our request to create a No Parking Zone on Carolina Ave. Thank you for your attention to tlns matter ....~ 3/27/2002 44815 PM Conditions' 'sociated with Case #: Fl 0'" '2-04 Cond Code Title Stat Changed Hold Status Changed By Tag Updated Updated By SW1 Solid Waste Condition Not Met 3/13/2002 TJG SWR1 3/15/2002 TJG a)DAppllcant will commit to a maintaining the eXlsllng two yard dumpster - Soltd Waste agrees Should the dumpster be upgraded to a larger dumpster then a new enclosure and pad will be required TER1 Traffic Eng Condition 1 Not Met 3/12/2002 M~G TER1 3/13/2002 RLG ENG1 1) All parking, Includmg.handlcap per City Standards pnor to certificate of occupancy Engmeenng Condition 1 Not Met ENG1 3/14/2002 a)DBack flow preventor deVice to be mstalled prior 10 Issuance of any pennlts Land Resource Condition 1 Not Met LRR1 3/14/2002 a)OShould a new dumpster pad be Installed the eXlstmg.turf block will need to be removed by hand MTP lRR1 MTP Best Copy Available Page 1 of 1 dJ~ N~~ ~,tt~~ ~" @ NQ~ ~~d r'G2. )4-~ vc.L~ ~ ~ \.e. ~ \Q..---- 4w ~c.L~_ ~~~tLf<2- f~ iJ ~\I:\~ ~~ t:\ Wo--~ v...- ~___~~-1 + N-~';u!'-~ @2. S \ s~~ e.... - ~~ -+0 ~ C'Q ~ - \t \\er _ (7) ~~~v~~ \r-. f&.r\.\ ~- ~~ _ \_V~~~ ~ \.\~ - \> eN:- \~ j_ 1l'=r~\)se.~;; &. 'b L ~ ~~o.....tA.J ;, \)1)0 .J- - . + , , , 1',1 ~ ; 1 III ,:1 il ----.lH----- - -- ---- - -- - ------ ---- .____/,~_ ';:;)\'l~e.::. k.... ...~e...- ~~-7--0~"'-i.t-.. - """"-'1- Q,;),,-- --- -- - . -- --~-r~_)_e-t.b41J~\l""-L""'c./2.i'.1"S----- - .-- ------ _ __ _ 3:+t J~!,-Ji A_ _>-iJL_ .lk_.:o - _p-t.K,k; ;j-_ yJ c.L/_L~I<-_ -li)-~ k- S?~ .-----A-t-~~ __Ws~~ i(llj~-,-'Lt,L -. - -- - -----t---~u J.:L~"2..3 - ----- Jt-- -___~~~-- ----- -~~=-: I ;11 ___~_...l.o._ 1[1- , II -------- :!l ! 11 --- ;1\ :11 I' -. -.~ ~ I, 'II 1 I ~ I _~ ~. I / I' 1-_1 _______ =~~-~~ _ _ _ __ _ _ -a _____ -_______~__ --- ---..__"....-- --.. -- - - ------- - -......--... ~--1 ., I, llll "I ,11 I I '.1 'I , 1 - ~---'I , :'\ , , " ,\ "I ---~ "t 'I ,iI ,) .. , \ 1/ ~---------~=------~-~- ---~---- --_....---~--~=---=-- " t : 1 . ,I I I ,I ,\ I \' ~I q I 1 I I I I, I' A'S OL nna WOrwWO,I'VI:J3L,' ll.l '0 t?i ~ ~ V) '" N ~ ~ 12 ~ 10 ~ ~ 6 <::) ~ t;J Available " , U7:lId) :lNV7 )J(fV7 AfOUV:lJiV (J.V7d) ':lA v NV:JIHJlJiV , -Ij~ii n.cr:L. '8/ ~... ~~ ~ a:- ;:;:3 ...~ ... I I ~ I ~ I ~ I l~ I ~ ,,~\ ~ -Cj I ~ ~ ~ "-.:- ~ l>. ~ S~ <::) ~ io~ l "G' :::~ '- (.I) 1;t t6 (d) 00 ye; ,/j.t?:,fl?:./OS lQ ~ <::) ~ LH \ t;:\ : ~ \S ~~\ aU r... 3~ -) ," , I" N ~\- r-- ~ \0> ,8 Lt I \.J ~. ~_ ^/S .l~ . -----=-- ~- - ~ ~\j~.~,~ -'-~j:, Ir <:>"F >J'!'-\O~ ~~ ~, b~~ .... ':~ ~~_ ~ "" _-1 l>i-- ... 101 i ~ ,--C~ _..-- ; - (_--~ (;) , --- ~_. ~ I ~ III "l " ~ <72 .90 r... -( \9' Oc> &0 -(&, '*' ~ ~J' ~ -/ ,.1\ - ~ (-,j "<t l'~,,... "'", I~.,,,,, "'''1''1 :;,;~~ I I :l"- I ~l lor. :I ---1 ~ I-~ I '-l I~ ~71 \ I ~ ~ \ I\~ ~l I ~ ~ ~ :--. I- ~I I ~I ~~ .J ~~ j ~~ r 1_ 3~f f ~ I i ~ Q ~~~ ~ ~ ;s~~~dlh! i :d;: ~ i:i ~ i:l '" u '" i:: O'l :l ~ ~~~~~~~g~~~~~~ ~ "tt II 1I II U o-(~:t...!!..n.~ :.) ~~tjA:~~~....e:~8~~to.; 't ~ <::) ~ !: / ,~ CO) ~ <::) ~ \ $ ..-, I ...... ~u 'in on (.i) gtt~- (d) ,DO /Ie; .Ii t?: CZ.'OS ;!; !!: ... I I ~ ;" i " I ;.., / Ul \ . s~~ b!<i~!'q - iii Ai ~ ~ .4!~ g t,~ Ii) ~ ~~ ~ ~ "'~ ~ 0 ~~~~ ~ ~,,~S ~ t~!':! 0 8~"~~ iJi tJ: g ~ ~ ,,0 t'5 ~ >- ~g~i:ih lQ 1::;!'0~0"~ o "':.i!::l:;iJi ~ ~~~~~~ ~ ----"'-- ~ ! if ~r~ -I ""' ~ VI in. '" - " ~ i. ~ b .~ o N b """' ~ ,~~ ~ ~ ~ ~"8 a :s ~ co ~ ;;; ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ '" <> ~ ~ ~ .J:: <>., G:5 ~ t'l ~ ~ C'i ~ '" ~ 8 ~ N ~ ;;; ~ li: 9. .,., a Q.~ ~ ~ ~ C,,!) ~ ~ >. ~ ~ % ~ .., " ., ~ .11 ~ N ~ ~ ti ~ ~ ~ S ~ u ~ i i> i \.) ~ ~ ~ <:> -. ~ t"-. ~ '" '" V') :a N @ Q::: ~ I' ~ C) ........... d <:).....t"-.~ ~~..:"''' El Qt"-." ~ ~kl ~@~~ ~ Q ~ ~~L>--. ~ ~f3l;Jej~] 3 ~ ~h~!; ~V')~~~'-1 ~ ~ ~~~~ ... ~ u~ ~ <:) ~ ~ ...;;:; ~ I ~ c; ~ ;1 ~ "" iii ~ ;;; ~.. ~ ~~~ f3~ '" "'8 l;; ~~~ ~.... ~ ~~ ;;~ s: >. - '" ., ~o '" o~ "'u 0 g~l:l ....., " s~ .. ~~8 '" "l~ CO' g~~ ~. :: g ~ ",'" f;l CC f'ig >'" f;1 n "'&l CO' ~C> ~ f?M '" ~~ ~ gj o.J "lQ ~ ~~ >. \.J.... 1:: ~c '" ....- C C., ~ '" ~\J ;;;:: '" So. '" 6 Q'< ~ ",0 ..,0 ... ~ ~; c ~~ 1;: e; '" ~ tl ~fi1 1: Cl "'''l I:; ~ ",,,, '" c ;;; ~ 5~ "" ...'" ~, ~ r-. r--. f-i~ Zi a 0" ):. ~:.o t-< 80 &; ~ '" V) ~~ Q !;:a ~ '-1 :iJ ~ ~~ 0 ~a < 'O::j ",::t: .......... r';:; '1;::, ~'tJ 0..... "<JF; ~~ t">I~ .."tl ~~ ~~ ~d 8-.; ~1ii "'< 00 -,~ ..,,5.1 ~b:, ~g ",,", r,::.o Co;u ~; ~~ ~~ 0", ~~ ~g ~ ~ ::.' v') ~ ~ <; ~ t:i C/J~ ~~ ~~ t'l1tTJ ~"<:1 c) :::t1 C/J '" ~ (j ~ a --l ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t3 ~ ~ b. ~ !tl i;! ~ 2J s; :r! 1>1 ~ a ei [j ~ r- ~ a "l1 p ~ ~ ~ ~ ;!~j:(J ",'-Iii! v;;o.'fri ~~q ;S~6 ~~kl 8t>>;;j ~~~ ~o~ ",]~ P,JQlf, t>;, N ~~e ~ 8 0 QOa ~ b ~~$ 2l ~ ill~~ ~ ~~g- OQg ....... '0 ~ 9 g'j tii ~ G v,:;- ~ ~ 0 o ~ 13 1:0 j Q "cl (" r" ? ~ S -<: 3d ;;j -..: ~ w ~ -.. N 8 is ~ ~ f>1 q a ~ :::tl V:l 2 fi1 ""'i ~ 5) \:) '~ ~ n:! rd IJ) ~ -<: IJ) -<: w -.. ~ ~ .~ 8t.':l'::J ~ ~ ~ l~ ~ ~ i ~-g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -g S! i~;;: C)\)g ~ ~H5 1;; 1 ~ ~ ~ 0 g.~ -, ~ g L!tl~ I Cii"~3:3"-<::4.. ,~ 5'l t:l to <ll '-<: Q 3, i)".O:!JiS l~!t'" ~ ~ !::;, VIa <3 2'~l.o>{i C) ,Flq,:::' -~~,~q, a.S 1 nCl..r-o::r~<llq iiS~qQ;J<lI~C.""~ c.O)".::-,::;,. ~ ~""~*Q ~g::rQ ) ~, """::! V)'~ 2 ~ II) R2 ~ii~3r:: _~qq,~ '~J ~ ." ~ "CO :;) <:)" :s; ~ 10 C:l ~ <: _T ~ Cl.:;) <lI lrl 1 ,., hJ ":i ~ CJ> :::! ';.;: fll "Il "JQ ~ g:'E \::l ) '-"" "" ~ ~ ....... ~ C) a Q fg. ill!tl~~_Vl-"" 1 ::J _-s :-'''' ::;,- s: (j::' g. ~ 3',-::1 ii ;:~i5..a\) 0""2. 1""C.~:::ri;l:J~ <ll ~Q - QO 1 ::) 'Q ~ "1;:, ~ Cl: Q ,~ ~ ~ d ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ Qj ~ 8 . ~ . ~ ~ t J....j I ~- ttj ~ t ~ '-- ..... ~ II ~ . OJ o q hl Q ~ j ..... q 0\ ( <:"c! .... 1 ""f. I ~ OJ >-- Ul ?~ ti: '" ~ ~e ~ .... tiii~Qa i~~ ~ :u ~ . u.","-_.~.....l.,,"~:r~:d.vi"~ilJJ,.u~~~._~".IIIr"._"""'.HJ:!.r""~N"'NR""""''''''._'~.__''''-''''-_~'~--~-1fIAl)flI ~--y J \~ .L ,\ C1l / !JI )f' "!. r H1 I - I I "~ ~..~ ~ ~~ . ~ ' --..~"- , ., . ...r-- ~~~~. .. Vol ... . -+>- N 9 ~ " ~ lJJ ~ ~ />. .. />. ... III .u. -T Ul \ .. 11 .. ~ -+>- o ~ ~ ~~~..... .... a ~ -..;. .. }9 A'" SIV _--h _ _ 41.8' VII ~ l..-I.,l t--..J........ ~ ..................................... ~~~~a~ ~~~~~h; "~~;:5~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~~~2 ~ ~~~~ ~ >::j~'""~ ~ ~-~~ g ~ ~:g ~ ~ ~~ ~ lj ~~ ~ ~ ~ -;: ~ i3l <: ~ tl ;S.:v~f)':'!~R~b;~~P' v'-~Cl~,...:L'" '" - 0,11 II ~ II ).:~ II I'.. II ~ II i .., '\'l ..., f) '" II f) '" .... C'l ;., C1 _ ~,~ ~~ 0 ~Ii ~ f;l ~ ~ ~l:J < !;: bo;1lt>,~~~i"i'" t ;;; R~~8?l!j~~ ~ : .~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ <; 1 ~ ~ ~~'" ~ r;; ~ i ~ f6 ~~- ~~ r ~ ~ 1-0 ~ ~ ;:; IJ ~lp r ~l l~ "'- ~ I I~ i::3 <::> I ' N -~ ~ :u ......1 ;;:; . 1 l- ~l I v' I f;' .... \'" t I i I ~ I I I ~- L r~ ~ ,. ':1~-1 :~ ~ c-;:," I);, C= j ~=---" '1 z. ...--~ -- ,,;;' --j ;:- 9":::;:0 'l) "u I ~ s;'i>~ ": -~ 1 "r I :: ~ ~'lftl, . ~-,; fj J~~': :? , !Tl : . , .. -- -.............. =-~ ! - -:~- -...:.:..- I I / \fECffl,l\ ORJ...'\j()(J(j GIllF1Q /JAY I - _-~... t I ~~_II!iII!!I;\I~~~r~U~II!II!Ii!'\{rf~9!.ll~t'I*II~ " 0: "YJ: ./ -U2_ "'/!~ J'l)- '*' J 1J)- </..-p DO ..& f- OG <'() ~ ::!;:.,.. roN. U1,-., "1) '-" ~~ - SOf~l3'24"W ~fl 00' (P) 9775' (i') I....,'" L,...Jo\ 8' :; UJ ;;: N '" _.....- 18,' I CONC) . STH1~ " fl .... ....~~...-. I:', ~ --..l I"!. -~ '" I 11 I ~ , \:5" Ii 'J '~~ " I: I .......<:: ~~~I _091 ...~a .: -~.\ ! ~- ~l \ I I ;::"t ~~I ~~ ,.. "WI, IIII':J 'I~", \~"' . 'l.4, ~ -'1- r 9~-.;-r\ . , \ ~ rf" r--. , i.::~' ; \ v,,; ~I] " ~ \~ ~ ~~ "-' '~, (j ~\~ ,J()o ,II ' I \ , \ 417' ~~ ~~ ~ @~ ::etl I 'E\ ~~l ~h ~ I ~,~~ I I ~':IS~ JJj b :J ...... Q ,~~ r 'I II II ~r -;:.:;- I, 00 .!'-' "" >-tj ~ no '\ ~ t-,!. \ In Ul \ D c ~\ 2: c \ ~ 'i '\ "1 " >-1 Cb \ MICHIGAN AVE. (PLAT) g MEADOW LARK LANE (FIELD ~ ~-- ~ ,'I u ) - ~- - i I r'j "\ I r J' i' -j , , I J.e.u,. .1.. ""'" 1....;,-, I>-H ~ t-; C ""3 ""I ~ " 1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING CITY OF CLEARWATER April 16,2002 DRAFT Present Vacant Seat Ed Hooper Edward Mazur, Jr ShIrley Moran Alex Pliska Kathy Milam ChaIr Acting ChaIr/Board Member Board Member Board Member Board Member Alternate Board Member (non-votIng) Absent Carlen A Petersen David GIldersleeve Vice-ChaIr Board Member Also Present. Leslie Dougall-SIdes Cynthia Tarapam LIsa L FIerce GIna Clayton Brenda Moses AssIstant City Attorney PlannIng DIrector ASSistant Plannrng DIrector Long Range PlannIng Manager Board Reporter PlannIng DIrector CynthIa Tarapam called the meeting to order at 2 00 p m at City Hall Member Moran nomInated Member Hooper as Acting ChaIr for thiS meetIng The motion was duly seconded and carried unanImously The Acting Chair offered the Invocation, followed by the Pledge of AllegIance To provide continuity for research, items are In agenda order although not necessanly discussed in that order. A APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING March 19 and April 3, 2002 Member Moran moved to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of March 19, 2002, and the specIal meeting of Apnl 3, 2002, as submitted In written summation to each board member The motIOn was duly seconded and carried unanImously B. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS: (Items 1 - 3) The following cases are not contested by the applIcant, staff, neIghbOring property owners, etc , and wIll be approved by a Single vote at the beginnIng of the meeting, 1 Case: ANX 02-02-02 - 7 South Hampton Road - Level Three Application Owners/ApplIcant Robert G Gabriel & Margaret A. Gabriel, WillIam C Caruthers & Mary K Caruthers, LImited Properties, Inc ,IJames F burns, Joseph J Sorota, Jr , Trustee of FlOrida Land Trust #172916/Brandon Realty Venture, Inc mcd04b02 1 4/16/02 Request (a) Land Use Plan amendment from RS, ResIdential Suburban & P, PreservatIon (County), to RU, Residential Urban and P, PreservatIon (CIty) (pending Case ANX 02-02-04} Presenter Etlm Udoh, Semor Planner 4 Case FL 02-02-03 - 18 Glendale Street - Level Two Application ApplJcant Scott OgIlvIe Location 0 10 acres on the north sIde of Glendale Street, approxImately 150 feet west of Mandalay Avenue Atlas Page 258A Zoning MHDR, MedIum High Density Residential DIstrict Request FlexIble Development approval to reduce the required front (south} setback from 25 to 1 6 feet (to deck) along Glendale Street and to reduce the sIde (west) setback from 10 to 1 9 feet (to deck), as a Resldent/allnf/II Project under the prOVISIons of Section 2-404 Proposed Use A 264-square foot wood deck as accessory to an eXIsting dwelling Presenter Wayne Wells, Senior Planner Member Doran moved to continue Items 1 - 4, Cases ANX 02-02-03, ANX 02-02-04, LUZ 02-02-03, and Fl02-02-03 The motion was duly seconded and carried unanl mously. D. NON-CONSENT AGENDA: (Item 1) 1. Case FL 02-02~04 - 3006 Gulf-to~Bay Boulevard - Level Two Application ApplIcant/Owner Thanh Phuoc Nguyen RepresentatIve. Patrick T MagUIre, Esquire LocatIon 0 28 acres on the north sIde of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard, approximately 100 feet east of Bayvlew Avenue Atlas Page 292A Zoning C, Commercial DIstrict Request Flexible Development approval to reduce the required number of parking spaces from 15 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area (32 spaces) to 8 5 spaces per 1,000 square fe-et of gross floor area (18 spaces), reduce the front (south) setback along gulf-to-Bay Boulevard from 25 to 3 6 feet to buildIng and 1 2 feet to pavement, reduce the sIde (west) setback from 10 to 3 feet to pavement, reduce the sIde (east) setback from 10 to zero feet to a dumpster enclosure and 5 feet to pavement, reduce the rear (north) setback from 20 to 1 5 feet to pavement and to permIt dIrect access to a major arterial road (Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard), as a ComprehensIve Inflll Redevelopment Project under the provIsions of SectIon 2-704 With ComprehensIve landscape Program under the provIsIons of Section 3-1 202 Proposed Use A restaurant Within an eXIsting one-story 2,132 square foot masonry block bUlldmg, WIth access on to Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard Presenter Wayne Wells, Semor Planner mcd04b02 5 4/16/02 SenIor Planner Wayne Wells presented the case The property owner IS propOSing to establish a restaurant at thIS location The Development RevIew Committee reviewed the applicatIon and supporting matenals on March 14, 2002 The Planning Department recommends approval of the FleXible Development application to reduce the requIred number of parking spaces from 15 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area (32 spaces) to 8 44 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area (18 spaces), reduce the front (south) setback from 25 feet to 3 6 feet to bUilding (existing) and 1 2 feet to pavement (exIstIng), reduce the side (west) setback from 10 feet to three feet to pavement (exIsting), reduce the sIde (east) setback from 10 feet to zero feet to a dumpster enclosure (exIsting) and fIve feet to pavement (existIng), reduce the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to 1 5 feet to pavement (existIng) and to permit direct access to a major arterial road (Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard), as a ComprehenSIve Inflll Redevelopment Project under the provIsIOns of Section 2-704, wIth a ComprehenSIve Landscape Program under the prOVISions of Section 3-1 202, for the site at 3006 Gulf to Bay Boulevard, WIth the follOWIng bases and condItIons Conditions 1) A bUSiness plan outlIning the operatIon of the proposed restaurant user With the maxImum number of employees on the largest shIft, the hours of operatIon, delivery hours, parkmg demand, ete be submItted to the Planning Department and be approved, prior to Issuance of any permits or lIcenses, 2) any change In the type of restaurant be evaluated for complimentary operational characteristIc and parkIng demand, and may reqUIre approval by the Community Development Board, 3) the bUlldmg appearance be Improved WIth the use of Windows, paint and awnings, acceptable to the Planning Department, 4) any upgrade to a dumpster larger than two yards Will require a new pad and enclosure, and any upgrade to the dumpster IS to be done Without removIng any parking spaces and 5} all Site and exterior bUIldIng Improvements be made to the satisfactIon of staff, pnor to the Issuance of any licenses or CertIfIcate of Occupancy Mr Wells said one letter of objectIon was received from the property owners directly north of the subject property In response to a questIon, Mr Wells said thiS property owner was preVIously denIed an applicatIon for a nightclub The property owner plans to establIsh a small mom 'n pop restaurant use that would generate a lower traffIC flow Patrick MagUIre, representatIve for the applicant, saId hiS clIent has had dIffIculty utIlIZing thIS property Plans are to adhere to staff's recommendation to preserve trees and limIt parking spaces on the site He said If the owner ever deCides to expand the bUSiness, he would do so on the east portIon of the property. The hours of operation for the proposed use would be determined at the time such a user was mterested In the property Mr Wells referred to an aenal view of the subject property He said there are 5 homes to the north of the property He was unsure of the number of homes on the south, east and west of It. In response to a questIon, Mr Wells saId mcd04b02 6 4/1 6/02 surrounding property owners were notifIed of today's hearing and only one responded In response to a questIon, Mr Wells said although no restaurateur has been determined for thIs sIte, staff recommends the CDS approve thIs request, as the user must adhere to the Code regulations relating to the number of allowable parking spaces, etc ]f approved, thIs sIte could only be utilized for a restaurant use unless the applicant submits a new applIcatIOn for a dIfferent use Planmng DIrector CyndJ Tarapanl Said staff normally does not know the exact user of a sIte If the CDS approves this applIcatIon for a restaurant use, staff WIll ensure the parkIng and other reqUIrements are met Concern was expressed that there would be Inadequate parking for customers and employees Mr Wells saId he does not anticIpate all 5 employees would park on sIte It was suggested that as the Code requires 2 parkmg spaces be removed for a dumpster, CondItIon #4 be amended to mclude that any upgrade to the dumpster IS to be done wIthout removmg any parkIng spaces Mr MagUIre saId hIS client has no objectIon to staff's proposed condItions or to the proposed amendment to CondItion #4, He saId more parkmg spaces would result In more bUSiness BUSiness owners try to limIt the number of parking spaces employees use on a sIte Member Mazur moved to approve Item 1, Case FL 02-02-04, amendmg conditIon #4 to read "a ny upgrade to a dumpster larger than two yards WIll reqUIre a new pad and enclosure, and any upgrade to the dumpster IS to be done WIthout removmg any parkIng spaces" The motion was duly seconded and carried unanImously E. CONTINUED ITEMS: (Item 1) 1 Case TA 02-02-01 - Community Development Code Amendments ApplIcant. CIty of Clearwater, PlannIng Department Request. ComprehenSIve amendments to the CommunIty Development Code, as a result of the annual reVIew, IncludIng amendments to the General PrOVISIons, Zonmg DIstricts, Development Standards, Development ReVIew and other Procedures, NonconformIty PrOVISIons, Enforcement Proceedings and PenaltIes and DefInitIons and Rules of ConstructIon Presenter RIchard Kephart, SenIor Planner Ms Tarapanl gave mtroductory comments and SenIor Planner RIch Kephart reviewed staff's proposed changes to the Code and Input obtamed from prevIous COB meetmgs At the April 3, 2002 COB (Commumty Development Board) Work SeSSIOn, the follOWing Issues were IdentIfIed regarding the proposed amendments to the CommunIty Development Code ROOF OVERHANG mcd04b02 7 4/16/02 CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS The Commumty Development Board of the Oty ot Clearwater, Flom/a, will hold Rubhc heanngs on Tuesday, April 16, 2002, begmnmg ,It 200 pm, m the, City CQllumsslon Chambers, m clIY Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Avenue, Clearwater, Flonda, to consider the followmg requesls: NOTE: All persons wlshm2" to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING or the meetme:. Those cases that are not contested by the applicant. staff, neie:hborine: property owner,>. etc will be placed on a consent ae:enda and approved bv a sme:le vole at the bcgmmne: of the meetine:. I Scott Ol!llvle IS requestmg a fleXible development approval to reduce the reqUIred front (south) setback flom 25 feet to 1 6 feet (tp deck) along Glendale Street and to reduce the side (west) setback tram 10 feet to 1 9 feet (to deck), as a ReSidential InfiJl Project under the proVIsions of Section 2-404 (Proposed Use: A 264 square foot wood deck as accessory to an eXistmg smgle-f1.1mlly dwelling) ailS Glendale St , c]earwdter Beach ReVIsed, Blk'4, Lot 13 FL 02-02-03 2 Thanh Phuoe & Kim-True Tltl Ne:uven are requesting a fleXible development approval to reduce the requlled number of parking spaces from 15 spaces per 1,0QO square feet of gross floor area (32 spaces) to 8 5 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area (18 spaces), reduce the front (soUlh) setback along Gulf to Bay Bou]evdrd from 25 feet to 3 6 feet to bUlldmg and 12 feet to pavement, reduce the Side (west) setback trom 10 fee! to three fect to pavement reduce the Side (east) setback from 10 feet to zero feet to a dumpster enclosure and five feel to pavemenl, reduce the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to 1 5 feet to pavement and to pernut direct access to a major artenal road (Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provlslOns of Section 2- 704 With comprehensl ve Landscape Program under the provISIons ot SectIOn 3-1202 (Proposed Use A re~taur ant wlthm an eXlstmg one-slory O2,132 square foot masonry block bUl]dmg, with acccss onto Gulf to Bay Bou]evard) at ~~~:2~~If.to. Bay BI,d , Bay V <ow C,ty Sub, B lk 8, Lots 8-10 & 1/2 'de alley on N '''''fi (h[f."C' a p f 3 The Clearwater Group. Ltd.! The Clearwater Retail GrouP. Ltd / ClearwaterlPmeview Association. Inc / Oscar F. & .Judith See:er are requestmg an amendment to a prevIOusly approved fleXible development application (FL 01-01-05) to decI ease the number of residentIal umts from 156 to 116 umts on Parcel 4" Increase the gross floor area on non-residentIal use from 15,602 square feet to 19,035 square feet on Parcels I and 5, replace a 2,500 square foot clubhousel42-space parkmg lot WIth 49 palkmg ~paces on Parcel 3 replace a 52,236 square foot, 48-ul1lt bUilding With a 6,300 square foot commercial bUilding and a portIOn Qf a 4 050 sqllare foot commercial bUIldlllg on ParcelS, combme Parcels 2, 5 and 5A mtQ a umfir:<d ParcelS, and comb me Parcels 4 and 4A Into umfied Parcel 4 (Proposed Use A I J 6-uml apartment complex WIth five commerCld1 bUlldmgs tota]mg 49,674 square feet, m the Commercial Dlstnct) t1I 1100 South MI,>soun Ave, Sec 15-29-15, M&B's 3410 & 34 ll, and Sec 22-29-15, M&B's 211[,2] 12&2113 FL02-02-06 Inlerested parties may appear and be heard at the heanngs or file wntten notIce at approval or objectIOn WIth the Planmng Director or CIty Clerk pnor to the heanngs Any person who deCides to appeal any deCISIOn made by the Board, WIth respect to any matter considered at such heanngs, wlll need a record of the proceedmgs and, for \uch purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatlm record of the proceedmgs IS made which record mcludes the testImony and eVIdence upon which the appeal IS to be based per Flonda Statute 286 0105 AlIllldlVlduals speakrng on publIc heanng Items Will be sworn III Five days pnor to the meetmg, staff reports and recommendatlOn~ on the above requests WI]] be aVaI]able for review by Inlerested partles between the hours of 8 30 a m and 430 pm, weekdays, at the clly of Clearwater, P]annmg Department, 100 S Myrlle Ave, Clearwater, FL 33756, or call (727) 562-4567 Lisa Fierce Plannmg Department CynthIa E Goudeau, CMC City Clerk