Loading...
05/17/2022 Community Development 2022-05-17 1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING MINUTES CITY OF CLEARWATER May 17, 2022 Roll Call Present 6 - Vice Chair John Quattrocki, Board Member Mike Flanery, Board Member Andrew Caudell, Board Member Audrey Haudricourt, Board Member Bruce Rector, and Acting Board Member Samuel Hutkin — arrived 1:06 p.m. Absent 2 - Chair Mary A. Lau and Board Member Andrew Park Also Present - Jay Daigneault—Attorney for the Board, Matthew Mytych —Assistant City Attorney, Lauren Matzke —Assistant Planning & Development Director and Patricia O. Sullivan — Board Reporter A. CALL TO ORDER, PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Vice Chair called the meeting to order at 1:00 p.m. at the Main Library followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. To provide continuity for research, items are in agenda order although not necessarily discussed in that order. B. ROLL CALL: C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING: April 19, 2022 Member Flanery moved to approve the minutes of the April 19, 2022 Community Development Board meeting as submitted in written summation. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. D. CITIZENS TO BE HEARD RE ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA E. CONSENT AGENDA: The following cases are not contested by the applicant, staff, neighboring property owners, etc. and will be approved by a single vote at the beginning of the meeting: (Items 1-5) 1. Case: FLD2022-01003 — 800 Pennsylvania Avenue Level Two Application Owner: Clearwater Neighborhood Housing Services, Inc. Applicant: Frank Cornier, Clearwater Neighborhood Housing Services, Inc., 608 North Garden Avenue, Clearwater FL, 33755, phone: (727) 442-4155; email: fcornier@cnhs1.org Location: 0.16 acre located on northwest corner of Pennsylvania Avenue and Seminole Street. Request: The Community Development Board is reviewing a proposed detached dwelling use in the Medium Density Residential (MDR) District for the property located at 800 Pennsylvania Avenue. The project includes a height of 15 feet, provides a minimum of 2 off-street parking Community Development 2022-05-17 2 spaces and requests allowable flexibility for setbacks and a six-foot fence in the front (Community Development Code Sections 2-304.G. and 3-804.A.1.). Neighborhood Associations: Clearwater Neighborhood Coalition, Board of County Commissioners, Pinellas County School Board, Plaza Park Neighbors Assigned Planner: Ellen Crandall, Development Review Manager See below for motion of approval. 2. Case: FLD2022-01004 — 1002 Jones Street Level Two Application Owner: Clearwater Neighborhood Housing Services, Inc. Applicant: Frank Cornier, Clearwater Neighborhood Housing Services, Inc., 608 North Garden Avenue, Clearwater FL, 33755, phone: (727) 442-4155; email: fcornier@cnhs1.org Location: 0.16 acre located on the northeast corner of Pennsylvania Avenue and Jones Street. Request: The Community Development Board is reviewing a proposed detached dwelling use in the Medium Density Residential (MDR) District for the property located at 1002 Jones Street. The project includes a height of 15 feet, provides a minimum of 2 off-street parking spaces and requests allowable flexibility for setbacks and a six-foot fence in the front (Community Development Code Sections 2-304.G. and 3-804.A.1.) Neighborhood Association: Clearwater Neighborhood Coalition, Board of County Commissioners, Pinellas County School Board, Plaza Park Neighbors Assigned Planner: Ellen Crandall, Development Review Manager See below for motion of approval. 3 Case: FLD2022-01005 — 900 La Salle Street Level Two Application Owner: Clearwater Neighborhood Housing Services, Inc Applicant: Frank Cornier, Clearwater Neighborhood Housing Services, Inc., 608 North Garden Avenue, Clearwater FL, 33755, phone: (727) 442-4155; email. fcornier@cnhs1.org Location: 0.17 acre located on the northeast corner of Roosevelt Avenue and La Salle Street. Request: The Community Development Board is reviewing a proposed detached dwelling use in the Medium Density Residential (MDR) District for the property located at 900 La Salle Street. The project includes a height of 15 feet, provides a minimum of 2 off-street parking spaces and requests allowable flexibility for setbacks and a six-foot fence in the front (Community Development Code Sections 2-304.G. and 3-804.A.1.). Neighborhood Association: Clearwater Neighborhood Coalition, Board of County Commissioners, Pinellas County School Board Assigned Planner: Ellen Crandall, Development Review Manager See below for motion of approval. 4. Level Two Application Case: FLD2015-05016A— 401/405/415/419 Coronado Drive and 406/410/420 Hamden Drive Owner(s): AP Beach Properties, LLC. Applicant: Brian J. Aungst, MacFarlane Ferguson & McMullen, P.A.; 625 Court Street; Suite 200; Clearwater, FL 33757; phone: (727) 441-8966; email: bia(a-)-macfar.com Location: 1.759 acres bound by Coronado Drive (west), Hamden Drive (east), and Fifth Street (north).. Request: The Community Development Board is reviewing an amendment to an approved Level Two Flexible Development application (FLD2015-05016) for the construction of a 166- Community Development 2022-05-17 3 unit hotel utilizing 66 permitted hotel units and an additional 100 units allocated from the Hotel Density Reserve through Beach by Design as currently approved through HDA2013-08006 (as amended by HDA2013-08006A) within the Tourist (T) District and Small Motel Character District of Beach by Design for the property located at 401/405/415/419 Coronado Drive and 406/410/420 Hamden Drive. The project will be 100 feet in height, proposes a minimum of 199 off-street parking spaces. The project requests allowable flexibility from height, setback requirements and the Design Guidelines of Beach by Design and a two-year Development Order (Community Development Code Sections 2-803.K and 4-407). Neighborhood Association: Clearwater Neighborhood Coalition, Board of County Commissioners, Pinellas County School Board, Clearwater Beach Association Assigned Planner: Mark Parry, AICP, Senior Planner Member Rector moved to approve Cases FLD2022-01003, FLD2022- 01004, FLD2022-01005 and FLD2015-05016A on today's Consent Agenda based on evidence in the record, including the application and the Staff Report, and here by adopt the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law stated in the Staff Report, with conditions of approval as listed. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. 5. PULLED FROM CONSENT AGENDA Level Two Application Case: FLD2021-12023 — 1001/1003/1005 North Garden Avenue; 606 Cedar Street; 1138 Grove Street; 1001 North Martin Luther King, Jr. Avenue; 1006/1008/1010/1012/1020/1026/1032 Blanche B. Littlejohn Trail; 1012 Railroad Avenue and 605/607/611/615/623/631 Palm Bluff Street Owner: Palm Bluff Development Group, LLC Applicant: Robert Pergolizzi, Krikor Greg Kassarjian and Sean P. Cashen; Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc; 13825 ICOT Boulevard, Suite 605, phone: (727) 524-1818; email. pergo@gulfcoastconsultinginc.com). Location: 2.162 acres (0.951 acres Downtown District and 1.212 acres Commercial District) bound by Palm Bluff Street (north), Blanch B. Littlejohn Trail (east), Cedar Street (south) and North Garden Avenue (west). Request: The Community Development Board is reviewing a proposed mixed-use project with 60 attached dwelling units (to include three units allocated from the Public Amenities Incentive Pool) in the Downtown (D) District and the Old Bay Character District for the properties located at 1001/1003/1005 North Garden Avenue; 606 Cedar Street; 1138 Grove Street; 1001 North Martin Luther King, Jr. Avenue and 1006 Blanche B. Littlejohn Trail and 24 attached dwelling units and 5,000 square feet non-residential development in the Commercial (C) District for the properties located at 1008/1010/1012/1020/1026/1032, Blanche B. Littlejohn Trail; 1012 Railroad Avenue and 605/607/611/615/623/631 Palm Bluff Street. The proposal includes a building height of 45 feet in the D District, 55 feet in the C District, a minimum of 106 off-street parking spaces with the following requests: D DISTRICT: requests three dwelling units to be allocated from the Public Amenities Incentive Pool, allowable flexibility from setback requirements, building entry location and treatment, finished floor elevations and location of parking (Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, Community Development Code Sections C-301.A.2, C-803.13.1, C-803.D.2, C-803.D.3 and C-803.E.2). C DISTRICT: requests allowable flexibility from setback requirements, height and landscaping. (Community Development Code Section 2-7045 and 3-1202.G). Community Development 2022-05-17 4 Neighborhood Association: Clearwater Neighborhood Coalition, Board of County Commissioners, Pinellas County School Board Assigned Planner: Mark Parry, AICP, Senior Planner Member Rector moved to accept Ellen Crandall as an expert witness in the fields of general planning, zoning, annexations, land use/rezoning amendments, comprehensive planning, site plan analysis, land development code & land development code amendments, special area plans and overlay districts, site plan review, tree rating/ assessment/ inventory, tree preservation techniques, erosion and sediment control for construction, Florida grades and standards for landscape material and trees, and International Society of Arboriculture standards. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Member Haudricourt moved to accept David Ojeda as an expert witness in the fields of civil engineering, land development, utilities, construction and building permits, stormwater, and FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency) floodplain regulations. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Development Review Manager Ellen Crandall provided a PowerPoint presentation on the Staff Report. The Engineering Department's traffic analyst had reviewed the application. Robert Pergolizzi, representing the applicant, said the CDB (Community Development Board) previously had accepted him as an expert witness. He reviewed the traffic study, stating that daily trip counts were too low to require a traffic impact study. He said use of the commercial space had not been determined and he did not think a restaurant would be considered. A resident expressed concern Blanche B. Littlejohn Trail was narrow with a single lane and Garden Avenue narrowed to 2 lanes north of the project. Mr. Pergolizzi said the Fire Department had required a condition of approval for the developer to widen Blanche B. Littlejohn Trail. Member Rector moved to approve Case FLD2021-12023 based on evidence in the record, including the application and the Staff Report, and here by adopt the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law stated in the Staff Report, with conditions of approval as listed. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. F. LEVEL TWO APPLICATION (ITEM 1) 1. Case: FLD2022-02007 — 873 Harbor Island Level Two Application Owners: Ian P. Snider and Aaron J. Snider Applicant: Greg Presby; Deuel & Associates; 565 S. Hercules Avenue, Clearwater, FL. 33764; email: greg(a-) elengineering.com Location: 0.263 acre located on the east side of Harbor Island approximately 200 feet south of northern terminus of Harbor Island. Community Development 2022-05-17 5 Request: The Community Development Board is reviewing a proposed 484 square-foot dock as accessory to a proposed single-family home in the Low Medium Density Residential/Island Estates Neighborhood Conservation Overlay (LMDR/IENCOD) District for the property located at 873 Harbor Island. The project is 82 feet in length and requests allowable flexibility for length (Community Development Code Section 3-601.C.1.g). Neighborhood Associations: Clearwater Neighborhood Coalition, Board of County Commissioners, Pinellas County School Board, Island Estates Civic Association Assigned Planner: Mark Parry, AICP, Senior Planner Todd Pressman requested Party Status as agent for the Parceys who owned the abutting property. Member Haudricourt moved to grant Party Status to Todd Pressman as representative for the Parceys. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Mark Belfiglio requested Party Status. Member Flanery moved to grant Party Status to Mark Belfiglio. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Connor Belfiglio requested Party Status. Member Flanery moved to grant Party Status to Connor Belfiglio. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Victor Jevtic requested Party Status as representative for his mother. Member Flanery moved to grant Party Status to Victor Jevtic as representative for his mother. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Member Rector moved to accept Melissa Hauck-Baker as an expert witness in the fields of general planning, zoning, redevelopment planning, land development code & land development code amendments, special area plans and overlay districts, site plan review, landscape architecture, historic preservation and comprehensive sign program. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Member Haudricourt moved to accept David Ojeda as an expert witness in the fields of civil engineering, land development, utilities, construction and building permits, stormwater, and FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency) floodplain regulations. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Member Rector moved to accept Eric Gandy as an expert witness in the field of environmental engineering, water quality, natural resources, contamination assessment, hazardous waste, coastal engineering, marine and dredging operations. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Community Development 2022-05-17 6 Senior Planner Melissa Hauck-Baker provided a PowerPoint presentation on the Staff Report. By right, tie poles could be 50 feet beyond the end of a dock, the property owners requested 18 feet. Member Haudricourt moved to accept Albert Carrier as an expert witness in the field of civil engineering, professional land surveying, and mapping. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Member Caudell moved to accept Roger Menendez as an expert witness in the field of certified ecologist, AICP planner, environmental sciences, ecology, and planning. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Attorney Brian Aungst, representing the property owners, reviewed the request. He said Island Estates had many nonconforming docks. He said Pinellas County, FDEP (Florida Department of Environmental Protection) and possibly ACOE (US Army Corps of Engineers) would not issue permits for new docks that impacted seagrasses. He said the seagrass study indicated seagrass extended 40 feet beyond the property's seawall. He said based on the property's width, a 42-foot dock was permitted, the proposed dock would extend 42 feet beyond the outer edge of the seagrass bed. He presented a photo of nearby docks longer than 70 feet. Roger Menendez, representing the property owners, said Pinellas County considered seagrass impacts during its dock permitting process. He said FDEP, FWC (Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission), and ACOE were the lead agencies for management of Florida seagrass. He said the seagrass study adhered to accepted survey methods. Albert Carrier, representing the property owners, said the owners were not requesting setback variances or a roof over the boat lifts. He said the 1,100- foot wide waterway featured slow speed buoys 275 feet from the property owners'seawall. He said every home site differed, tie poles off a 90-foot dock on Bay Esplanade were 110 feet from the seawall. He said new docks must extend beyond seagrass beds. He said the current 8-foot by 8-foot dock did not meet the owners'needs, seagrass was not present under that dock due to shading. He said new docks triggered new requirements protecting seagrass from shade, prop dredging, and turbidity. He said he designed the dock to avoid the need for a CDB rehearing. He said sunlight would reach the seagrass through a grated walkway. Attorney Aungst said the request was for minimum flexibility and met Code criteria for approval. In response to a concern that a large fishing boat on a lift would block neighbors' views, Attorney Aungst said based on Florida law, the Board was not permitted to consider views. He said the City's environmental staff had reviewed the application. He said the Staff Report indicated the dock was supportable as it was the minimum length necessary to protect marine life and seagrass. He said permit applications to Pinellas County must include a seagrass study, he did not know if Pinellas County Community Development 2022-05-17 7 would approve a shorter dock. In response to questions, Attorney for the Board Jay Daigneault said Code allowed property owners to construct new docks at a length governed by Code. The application was appropriate. The request was for the minimum variance that made possible the reasonable use of the property owners' land. He was unfamiliar with Pinellas County law re dock lengths. Concerns were expressed that boaters could be injured if they hit the new dock that would be at least 8 feet longer than nearby docks, poles beyond the dock would pose additional dangers, and a boat on a lift could block sightlines for passing boaters. Party Status holder Todd Pressman, as agent for the Parceys, provided a PowerPoint presentation stating a major variance was requested. He expressed concern the applicants had based this request on their need for a 66,000 pound boat lift for their 50-foot boat. He said the dock would not be in harmony or uniform with nearby docks and would create a major public safety hazard. He said a shorter dock could accommodate a smaller boat. He said the channel was close to shore and showed video of boaters and jet skis speeding close to shore. He said boaters were familiar with current conditions. When asked if he was a certified land planner, Mr. Pressman said he was just presenting facts. Assistant City Attorney Matthew Mytych noted that Todd Pressman was not a marine law expert and could not testify on marine safety as a safety study had not been done. City Code differed from County dock regulations. Attorneys Daigneault and Mytych said the CDB was requested to consider criteria related to the dock request, boats were irrelevant to the case. Questions were posed re the size of the property owners'boats. Party Status holder Mark Belfiglio said he did not provide consent when approached by the property owners. He showed aerial photos of nearby docks, expressing concern re liability issues due to heavy area traffic including speeding boaters cutting the corner close to shore. He said forcing non-motorized vessels, often operated by children, to maneuver around a longer dock would be hazardous. He expressed concern the applicants had proposed 2 boat lifts and could park a 3rd boat at the end of the dock. He said the slow speed buoys moved with the currents and were 160 feet from the seawall. He said the flexible standard was detrimental to the public interest and welfare. He expressed concern a tragedy would occur. He said a petition with 81 signatures opposed the proposed dock. Party Status holder Connor Belfiglio said the long dock's location near the tip of the finger was in a dangerously congested area and would be hazardous. He said boaters could not see around the blind curve, often sped close to shore and could collide with the dock. He said the extended dock would be hazardous for non-motorized vessel operators. He Community Development 2022-05-17 8 expressed concern the project's plans did not indicate the walkway would be grated. He said the owners'boat was too large for the property and should be moored parallel to the seawall to protect seagrass. Party Status holder Victor Jevtic, as representative for his mother, said the long dock would be hazardous for speeding boats rounding the corner. He expressed concern the property owners' 50-foot boat's propeller would stir up sediment and destroy seagrass. He said safety should be the top priority. During cross-examination by Attorney Mytych, Mr. Pressman reviewed his appointments to local boards. He said he has handled hundreds of area zoning and land use cases. During cross-examination by Attorney Aungst, Mr. Carrier said he designed the dock with the lift as close to the seawall as possible while minimizing seagrass impacts. With the bow at the end of the seagrass, he said the sun could penetrate the water midday. He said docking boats parallel to the seawall would require one boat to intrude on the neighbor's riparian rights every time it left and returned. Mr. Carrier said tie poles helped guide boats onto lifts. He said if the tide is too low, tie poles would provide an option to tie up the boat until the tide rises. He said the property owner had a right to 2 moorings. In response to questions, Ms. Hauck-Baker said no one could predict where seagrass will grow. The nearby 70+ foot docks were constructed prior to 1999 when the Code was updated. The Code did not reference views nor boats. She discussed the application's compliance with the Code's General Applicability Standards. Applications could contain irrelevant information. She was unaware if the proposed dock posed any threats to the marine environment. Pinellas County was the local entity that issued dock permits. The Code reference to visual related to the dock's design. The Code referenced roofs over boat lifts but did not dictate the size of boat lifts. In response to questions, Marine and Aviation Director Eric Gandy reviewed his background. He had the highest respect for life safety issues and recommended approval of the dock. All boaters should operate responsibly, especially in slow speed zones. Speeding boats near the shoreline were an enforcement issue, he will request increased marine patrols. The subject property fronted open water with sufficient space for boats and personal watercraft. He recommended reflective material on the tie poles. Many waterfront properties in Clearwater featured unmarked tie poles. Discussion ensued with concerns expressed re the maximum length a dock could be and the danger posed by tie poles that could not be seen at night or during inclement weather. In response to suggestions, the extreme difficulties to replant seagrass were discussed. Party Status holder Mark Belfiglio said the proposed dock resembled a marina attached to a small lot. He said the property owners did not want to Community Development 2022-05-17 9 dock their boat parallel to the shoreline and block their view. Party Status holder Victor Jevtic as representative for his mother expressed concern the property owners could have 2 boats on boatlifts plus a boat at the end of the dock. Five residents spoke in opposition. Party Status holder Todd Pressman as agent for the Parceys said public safety on a major waterway was a major part of the request for the extra- long dock. He said the request failed to meet all Code criteria. He said a 40- foot boat would work. He said the longtime problem of speeding boat traffic was not fixed. He said the area was more dangerous at night and during bad weather. Party Status holder Mark Belfiglio said the issue was safety, he did not want a tragedy to occur. Attorney Aungst said no expert witness had spoken in opposition to the request. He said the property owners would agree to additional Conditions of Approval: 1) tie poles would not be used for permanent mooring and 2) no more than 2 boats would be moored at the dock on a permanent basis. He said residents had no authority to dictate the size of a neighbor's boat. He said docks in Pinellas County could extend up to 250 feet. Attorney Daigneault instructed the Board to ignore the signature petition submitted in opposition to the request, signatories were not present to be cross examined or judged for credibility. He reviewed applicable Code sections and said the Board should confine their decision to general criteria in the Code. Discussion ensued with comments that it would make more sense for Pinellas County to be approached first for dock permits, tie poles would pose a hazard for boaters, boaters hitting the tie poles or dock would be at fault for reckless operation and required to pay damages, the Code did not address boat size, the dock's length was a safety concern for paddleboarders in this area of heavy boat traffic, increased enforcement for speeding boats was necessary, bad actors should not influence this decision, the request could not be denied based on safety criteria, Pinellas County and FDEP review of the request would occur, and mooring the boats parallel to the seawall would infringe on the neighbor's riparian rights. Neighborhood residents were thanked for their participation. Member Flanery moved to approve Case FLD2022-02007 based on evidence in the record, including the application and the Staff Report, and here by adopt the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law stated in the Staff Report, with conditions of approval as listed plus added condition 7) That the four tie poles beyond the dock be removed from approval. The motion was duly seconded. Members Flanery, Caudell, Haudricourt, Acting Member Hutkin, and Vice Chair Quattrocki voted rl Community Development 2022-05-3. "Aye"; Member Rector voted "Nay." Motion carried. G. DIRECTOR'S ITEM: (Item 1) 1. TIME EXTENSION — FLD2020-01002 — 2425 McMullen -Booth Road H. ADJOURN Attest: 10 Senior Planner Melissa Hauck -Baker said the Director previously had approved a one-year extension for this project. Delays were related to supply chain problems. The Board was requested to approve a 2nd extension to June 16, 2023. Member Flanery moved to extend the deadline for Case FLD2020- 01002 to June 16, 2023. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 4:20 p.m. � ��,,yy Chai ;`Cbmmunitytevelopment Board CITY OF CLEARWATER CIE vitvy vri-i 1>]\N\1>(, & Df Pr, l) F Orwr_:r: Boa 4748, Cu vRvv vrna<, FLORIDA 337D8-4-748 i11:wcm:vi Sr=t<� u:r-� Bi i. ii1�G, 100 1\1,, Writ i Ni I-, Ci.r;v<ce:ci i:r., I-L(WI»:v I'eu.r nine !727) 562-4567 TO: Community Development Board Members FROM: Gina Clayton, Planning and Development Director COPIES: Mathew Assistant City Attorney; Attorney Jay Daigneault, Susan Chase, Documents and Records Specialist / Pat Sullivan, Board Reporter SUBJECT: Agenda Items: May 17th DATE: May 10th Community Development Board Packets being distributed contain the following: Unapproved minutes of April 19th /2 Level Two Applications (Items 1-6) FLD2022-01003 — 800 Pennsylvania Avenue Assigned Planner: Ellen Crandall Yes: No: ______ FLD2022-01004 —1002 Jones Street Assigned Planner: Ellen Crandall Yes: No: . FLD2022-01005 — 900 La Salle Street Assigned Planner: Ellen Crandall ;Yes: No: C 4. FLD2015-05016A — 401/405/415/419 Coronado Drive & 406/410/420 Hamden Drive Assigned Planner: Mark Parry Yes: No: J 5. FLD2022-02007 — 873 Harbor Island Assigned Planner: Mark Parry Yes: No: 6. FLD2021-12023 — 1001/1003/1005 North Garden Avenue; 606 Cedar Street; 1138 Grove Street; 1001 North Martin Luther King, Jr. Avenue; 1006/1008/1010/1012/1020/1026/1032 Blanche B. Littlejohn Trail; 1012 Railroad Avenue and 605/607/611/615/623/631 Palm Bluff Street Assigned Planner: Mark Parry Yes: No: I have conducted a personal investigation on the personal site visit to the following properties. 1 7 Signature: ' y f' Date: :f s Print Name: i d M t ( Prepared by: Isabel Winget, Administrative Assistant CITY OF CLEARWATER Cll..ALM . TFR PLANNING & DrvLLtIPMLNr, Por Urru.t: Box 1748, CIL AK yT1.ii, Pi.nu<ll) \ 33758-1748 NhLMaim- Sr av )ces Bi r.nuNL,, I (() Su WTI I N1l irrt.. A� t:tiisr• Ci.iI.vtvy:Vii R, FIX /121DA 33'S6 1'ci.rrin,xe C27) 562-4567 TO: Community Development Board Members FROM: Gina Clayton, Planning and Development Director COPIES: Mathew Assistant City Attorney; Attorney Jay Daigneault, Susan Chase, Documents and Records Specialist / Pat Sullivan, Board Reporter SUBJECT: Agenda Items: May 17th DATE: May 10th Community Development Board Packets being distributed contain the following: Unapproved minutes of April 19th Level Two Applications (Items 1-6) 1. FLD2022-01003 – 800 Pennsylvania Avenue Assigned I' anner: Ellen Crandall Yes: Jr No: ___ 2. FLD2022-01004 –1002 Jones Street Assigned P nner: Ellen Crandall Yes: No: 3. FLD2022-01005 – 900 La Salle Street Assigned P}'nner: Ellen Crandall Yes: ✓ No: 4. FLD2015-05016A – 401/405/415/419 Coronado Drive & 406/410/420 Hamden Drive Assigned PI er: Mark Parry Yes: f No: 5. FLD2022-02007 873 Harbor Island Assigned Pla er: Mark Parry Yes: No: 6. FLD2021-12023 – 1001/1003/1005 North Garden Avenue; 606 Cedar Street; 1138 Grove Street; 1001 North Martin Luther King, Jr. Avenue; 1006/1008/1010/1012/1020/1026/1032 Blanche B. Littlejohn Trail; 1012 Railroad Avenue and 605/607/611/615/623/631 Palm Bluff Street Assigned Planner: Mark Parry Yes: No: I have . 11Pill.".I:.�1 ,,. -tion on the •ersonal site visit to the following properties. ..ice'" >/ Si:nature:��:/���y..i Date: t"— ,,91) Print Name: l O ULA Prepared by: Isabel Winget, ministrative Assistant CITY OF CLEARWATER CIE Vii`.Ii PLANNING & Di V I.:,i,1ai.y"r, Poor OFFICE B:,a 4748, CLUTARIA.ATP.k, Fi (R1DI 33758-1718 1tt:N;crny. Sexy ices 13cn.ni,�G, 10(1 Sui rt; M irri.;. ,AVi Ncii, Ci.r.nkve;rrr:R, 17";,Rmv 33756 1'ei.r.Pi;r,Ne (727) 562-4567 TO: Community Development Board Members FROM: Gina Clayton, Planning and Development Director COPIES: Mathew Assistant City Attorney; Attorney Jay Daigneault, Susan Chase, Documents and Records Specialist / Pat Sullivan, Board Reporter SUBJECT: Agenda Items: May 17th DATE: May 10th Community Development Board Packets being distributed contain the following: Unapproved minutes of April 19th Level Two Applications (Items 1-6) 1. FLD2022-01003 — 800 Pennsylvania Avenue Assigned Planner: Ellen Crandall Yes: No: 2. FLD2022-01004 —1002 Jones Street Assigned Planner: Ellen Crandall Yes: No: 3. FLD2022-01005 — 900 La Salle Street Assigned Planner: Ellen Crandall Yes: No: 4. FLD2015-050 6A — 401/405/415/419 Coronado Drive & 406/410/420 Hamden Drive Assigned P nner: Mark Parry Yes: No: 5. FLD2022-02' 17 — 873 Harbor Island Assign -d ' anner: Mark Parry Yes: No: 6. FLD2021-12023 — 1001/1003/1005 North Garden Avenue; 606 Cedar Street; 1138 Grove Street; 1001 North Martin Luther King, Jr. Avenu • 1006/1008/1010/1012/1020/1026/1032 Blanche B. Littlejohn Trail; 1012 Railroad Avenue and 605/607/611/ 5/623/631 Palm Bluff Street Assign d lanner: Mark Parry Yes: No: I have conducted a .ersoal inv sti_atio on the •ersonal site visit to the folio 'n:.ro.erties. Signatur : /pate: /7 ZZ Print Name: Ir.tjc,)(- c_ca-ki— Prepared by: Isabel Wi : - , d i r strative Assistant