Loading...
12/15/2020 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING MINUTES CITY OF CLEARWATER December 15, 2020 Present: Chair Michael Boutzoukas, Board Member Mike Flanery, Board Member John Quattrocki, Board Member Brian Barker, Acting Board Member Nils Kushta Absent: Vice Chair Christopher J. Anuszkiewicz, Board Member Mary A. Lau, Board Member Jordan Behar Also Present— Randy Mora —Attorney for the Board, Michael Fuino —Assistant City Attorney, Gina Clayton — Planning & Development Director, Lauren Matzke —Assistant Planning & Development Director, Patricia O. Sullivan — Board Reporter A. CALL TO ORDER, INVOCATION, PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Chair called the meeting to order at 1:00 p.m. at the Main Library followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. To provide continuity for research, items are in agenda order although not necessarily discussed in that order. B. ROLL CALL: C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING: November 17, 2020 Member Quattrocki moved to approve the minutes of the November 17, 2020 Community Development Board meeting as submitted in written summation. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. D. CITIZENS TO BE HEARD RE ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA: None. E. CONSENT AGENDA: The following cases are not contested by the applicant, staff, neighboring property owners, etc. and will be approved by a single vote at the beginning of the meeting: (Items 1 -7) 1. Case: FLD2020-09018 - 1280 and 1298 Lakeview Rd. Level Two Application Owner(s): Cobblestone I CTC LLC Applicant/Representative: Brian J. Aungst, MacFarlane Ferguson & McMullen, P.A.; 625 Court Street, Clearwater, FL 33756; phone: 727-441-8966; email: bia(a-)macfar.com. Location: 8.769-acre property located on the north side of Lakeview Road at the intersection of Adams Avenue and Lakeview Road and at the intersection of Betty Lane and Lakeview Road. Request: The Community Development Board (CDB) is reviewing an application for a termination of status as a nonconformity including density of 113 mobile home units where 89 mobile home units are able to be permitted and setback reductions in the Mobile Home Park (MHP) District with companion cases LUP2020-10001 and Community Development 2020-12-15 1 REZ2020-10001 (Future Land Use and Zoning Atlas amendments) for the properties located at 1280 Lakeview Road and 1298 Lakeview Road. The project requests allowable flexibility from setback and landscape requirements (Community Development Code Sections 2-603.A, 6-109.C, and 3-1202.G). Associations: Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition and Board of County Commissioners Assigned Planner: Kevin W. Nurnberger, Senior Planner Member Barker declared a conflict of interest. Member Quattrocki moved to approve Case FLD2020-09018 on today's Consent Agenda based on evidence in the record, including the application and the Staff Report, and here by adopt the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law stated in the Staff Report, with conditions of approval as listed. The motion was duly seconded. Board Members Flanery and Quattrocki, Chair Boutzoukas and Acting Board Member Kushta voted "Aye"; Member Barker abstained. Motion carried. 2. Case FLD2019-08023 — 1101 Druid Road Level Two Application Owner(s): SWH HOLDINGS LLC Applicant/Representative: Stuart Rogers, Maser Consulting; 5471 West Waters Avenue Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33634; phone: 813-207-1061; email- SRogers@maserconsulting.com Location: 1.61-acre property located at the southeast corner of Druid Road E. and S. Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue. Request: The Community Development Board (CDB) is reviewing a 125-bed assisted living facility project in the High Density Residential (HDR) District for the property located at 1101 Druid Road. The project will be 56 feet in height, includes 51 off-street parking spaces and requests allowable flexibility from building height, off-street parking and landscaping requirements (Sections 2-504.F and 3-1202.G). Associations: Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition and Board of County Commissioners Assigned Planner: Vinod Kadu LEED AP, Senior Planner See below for motion of approval. 3. Case: FLD2020-09019 — 1025 LaSalle Street Level Two Application Owner: Habitat for Humanity of Pinellas County Agent: Ken Rush; Habitat for Humanity of Pinellas County (13355 49th St N, Clearwater, Florida 33762; phone: 727-536-4755; email: krush@habitatpinellas.org) Location: 0.2764 acre located on the south side of LaSalle Street approximately 115 feet west of North Martin Luther King, Jr. Avenue. Request: The Community Development Board is reviewing a proposed detached dwelling in the Commercial (C) District for the property located at 1025 LaSalle Street. The proposal includes one detached dwelling approximately 13 feet in height and requests allowable flexibility regarding use (Section 2-704.F). Community Development 2020-12-15 2 Neighborhood Associations: Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition and Board of County Commissioners Assigned Planner: Mark T. Parry, AICP, Senior Planner See below for motion of approval. 4. Case: FLD2009-08026B (Parcel A) — 309 Coronado Dr. Level Two Application Owner(s)/Applicant: Key Clearwater, LLC. Representative: Katherine Cole; Hill Ward Henderson (600 Cleveland Street, Suite 800, Clearwater FL 33756; phone: 727-581-1893; email: katie.cole@hwhlaw.com) and Housh Ghovaee; Northside Engineering, Inc. (300 South Belcher Road, Clearwater, FL, 32765; phone: 727-709-0943; email: housh(a)northsideengineering.net) Location: 0.979 acre (as proposed) located at the southwest corner of Third Street and Hamden Drive. Request: The Community Development Board is reviewing proposed amendments to approved Level II Flexible Development applications FLD2009-08026/FLD2009- 08026A (Parcel/Hotel A) and FLD2009-08027/FLD2009-08027A (Parcel/Hotel B) in the Tourist (T) District and the Small Motel District of Beach by Design for the property located at 309 Coronado Drive (formerly 301, 309 and 315 Coronado Drive and 316 and 326 Hamden Drive). No changes are proposed to the existing buildings regarding height or setbacks. The amendments will reallocate the number of hotel units and land area split between the two parcels/hotels, reduce the overall area of non-accessory commercial space and revise the approved mix uses which may occupy such space, and provide for a reduction in setback for additional patio/deck space (Parcel/Hotel A only). The project requests allowable flexibility from setbacks (to patio/deck; Parcel/Hotel A only) and parking (Community Development Code Section 2-803.D). Associations: Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition, Board of County Commissioners and Clearwater Beach Assigned Planner: Mark T. Parry, AICP, Senior Planner See below for motion of approval. 5. Case: FLD2009-08027B (Parcel B) — 309 Coronado Drive Level Two Application Owner(s)/Applicant: Key Clearwater, LLC. Representative: Katherine Cole; Hill Ward Henderson (600 Cleveland Street, Suite 800, Clearwater FL 33756; phone: 727-581-1893; email: katie.cole@hwhlaw.com) and Housh Ghovaee; Northside Engineering, Inc. (300 South Belcher Road, Clearwater, FL, 32765; phone: 727-709-0943; email: housh(a)northsideengineering.net) Location: 0.947 acre (as proposed) located on the east side of Coronado Drive, south side of Third Street and the west side of Hamden Drive approximately 100 feet north of Brightwater Drive. Request: The Community Development Board is reviewing proposed amendments to approved Level II Flexible Development applications FLD2009-08026/FLD2009- Community Development 2020-12-15 3 08026A (Parcel/Hotel A) and FLD2009-08027/FLD2009-08027A (Parcel/Hotel B) in the Tourist (T) District and the Small Motel District of Beach by Design for the property located at 309 Coronado Drive (formerly 301, 309 and 315 Coronado Drive and 316 and 326 Hamden Drive). No changes are proposed to the existing buildings regarding height or setbacks. The amendments will reallocate the number of hotel units and land area split between the two parcels/hotels, reduce the overall area of non-accessory commercial space and revise the approved mix uses which may occupy such space, and provide for a reduction in setback for additional patio/deck space (Parcel/Hotel A only). The project requests allowable flexibility from setbacks (to patio/deck; Parcel/Hotel A only) and parking (Community Development Code Section 2-803.D). Associations: Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition, Board of County Commissioners and Clearwater Beach. Assigned Planner: Mark T. Parry, AICP, Senior Planner Member Quattrocki moved to approve Cases FLD2019-08023, FLD2020-090197 FLD2009-08026B and FLD2009-08027B on today's Consent Agenda based on evidence in the record, including the application and the Staff Report, and here by adopt the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law stated in the Staff Report, with conditions of approval as listed. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. 6. Case: LUP2020-10001 — 1280 and 1298 Lakeview Rd. Level Three Application Owner(s): Cobblestone I CTC, LLC Applicant/Representative: Brian J. Aungst, Jr., Esq. (625 Court Street, Suite 200, Clearwater, FL 33756. Phone-727-441-8966; Email: bja@macfar.com) Location: 8.908-acre property located approximately 950 feet east of South Missouri Avenue, on the north side of Lakeview Road. Request: The Community Development Board (CDB) is reviewing a request to amend the Future Land Use Map designation of the properties from Residential Medium (RM) and Residential Urban (RU) to Residential Low Medium (RLM) with companion case FLD2020-09018 (termination of status as a nonconformity), and making a recommendation to City Council. Type of Amendment: Small Scale Associations: Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition and Board of County Commissioners Assigned Planner: Diego Guevara, Senior Planner Member Barker declared a conflict of interest. See below for motion to recommend approval. 7. Case: REZ2020-10001 — 1298 Lakeview Road Level Three Application Owner(s): Cobblestone I CTC, LLC Applicant/Representative: Brian J. Aungst, Jr., Esq. (625 Court Street, Suite 200, Clearwater, FL 33756. Phone-727-441-8966; Email: bja@macfar.com) Community Development 2020-12-15 4 Location: 0.141-acre property located approximately 1250 feet east of South Missouri Avenue, on the north side of Lakeview Road. Request: The Community Development Board (CDB) is reviewing a request to amend the Zoning Atlas from Medium Density Residential (MDR) to Mobile Home Park (MHP) with companion case FLD2020-09018 (termination of status as a nonconformity), and making a recommendation to City Council. Associations: Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition, and Board of County Commissioners Assigned Planner: Diego Guevara, Senior Planner Member Barker declared a conflict of interest. Member Quattrocki moved to recommend approval of Cases LUP2020-10001 and REZ2020-10001 on today's Consent Agenda based on evidence in the record, including the application and the Staff Report, and here by adopt the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law stated in the Staff Report, with conditions of approval as listed. The motion was duly seconded. Board Members Flanery and Quattrocki, Chair Boutzoukas and Acting Board Member Kushta voted "Aye"; Member Barker abstained. Motion carried. F. LEVEL THREE APPLICATIONS: (Items 1-2) 1. Case: LUP2020-10002 —2250 Nursery Road Level Three Application Owner(s): Larry & Gladys N. Hilkert Applicant/Representative: Housh Ghovaee, Northside Engineering (300 S. Belcher Road, Clearwater, FL 33765. Phone: 727-443-2869; Email: housh@northsideengineering.net) Location: 0.875-acre property located on the north side of Nursery Road approximately 645 feet east of Belcher Road. Request: The Community Development Board (CDB) is reviewing a request to amend the Future Land Use Map designation from Residential Suburban (RS) to Residential Urban (RU) and making a recommendation to City Council. Type of Amendment: Small Scale Associations: Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition and Board of County Commissioners Assigned Planner: Kyle Brotherton, Senior Planner Member Barker moved to accept Kyle Brotherton as an expert witness in the fields of zoning, annexations, land use/rezoning applications, and comprehensive planning. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Senior Planner Kyle Brotherton provided a summary Staff Report. Staff recommended approval. Housh Ghovaee, representing the property owner, said the land use amendment would provide an appropriate transition from high density development to single-family residences. He said Mr. Hilkert wanted to bring his property into compliance. Community Development 2020-12-15 5 Member Flanery moved to accept Wayne Wells as an expert witness in the fields of land use and planning and zoning. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Wayne Wells, representing the property owner, described surrounding land uses, stating the amendment was consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and compatible with adjoining uses. He said the density increase from 2 to 6 units per acre was reasonable and would make the subject property conforming. He said nearby low density uses were oriented to side streets, not Nursery Road. Clay Gilman, representing next door neighbor Robert Metz, said the MCEB (Municipal Code Enforcement Board) had cited the subject property for violations. He said the property's western wall had collapsed into the creek and the property was in disrepair and always out of compliance with multiple vehicles parked on the grass, 4 units and mailboxes onsite where 2 units were permitted, and the rental of an unpermitted structure. He said increased density was inconsistent with the neighborhood and Mr. Metz did not want increased density next to his house. Discussion ensued regarding a City lien on the subject property that was rescinded due to a filing error. Attorney Fuino said the property's Code violations had been corrected and staff had verified the correct names on the property. Travis Hott said he was Larry Hilkert's nephew. He said the extra vehicles would be removed next month. He said Mr. Hilkert and Mr. Metz had been fighting for years. He said Mr. Hilkert's 2 extra units had not been occupied for at least 6 years. He said the County owned the creek and sheer cliff next to Mr. Hilkert's wall that recently collapsed due to severe erosion on County land; Mr. Hilkert was in touch with the County to restore its property. He said Mr. Metz had the zoning changed on property abutting the Hilkerts' and Metzes' properties to the rear to develop multi-family housing. He said Mr. Hilkert was considering replacing his property's structures with a triplex. In response to a question, Attorney for the Board Randy Mora said the property owner was obligated to bring the property into compliance prior to final approval of the requested amendments. Member Barker moved to recommend approval of Case LUP2020-10002 based on evidence in the record, including the application and the Staff Report, and here by adopt the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law stated in the Staff Report, with conditions of approval as listed. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. 2. Case: REZ2020-10002 —2250 Nursery Road Level Three Application Owner(s): Larry & Gladys N. Hilkert Community Development 2020-12-15 6 Applicant/Representative: Housh Ghovaee, Northside Engineering (300 S. Belcher Road, Clearwater, FL 33765. Phone: 727-443-2869; Email: housh@northsideengineering.net) Location: 0.875-acre property located on the north side of Nursery Road approximately 645 feet east of Belcher Road. Request: The Community Development Board (CDB) is reviewing a request to amend the Zoning Atlas designation from Low Density Residential (LDR) District to Medium Density Residential (MDR) District and making a recommendation to City Council. Associations: Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition and Board of County Commissioners Assigned Planner: Kyle Brotherton, Senior Planner Senior Planner Kyle Brotherton provided a summary Staff Report. Staff recommended approval. Clay Gilman, representing next door neighbor Robert Metz, said issues he had raised for Case LUP2020-10002 applied to Case REZ2020-10002. Member Barker moved to recommend approval of Case REZ2020-10002 based on evidence in the record, including the application and the Staff Report, and here by adopt the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law stated in the Staff Report, with conditions of approval as listed. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. G. APPEAL: (Item 1) 1. Case: APP2020-00002 — 1312 Dickenson Drive Owner(s)/Applicant: Adam Weaver, Jr. Representative: Jaclyn Palazzolo, (1312 Dickenson Drive Clearwater, FL 337647 phone: 727-776-774; email: jpalazzolo@alaw.net) Location: 0.224 acre located on southwest corner of Dickenson Drive and Moreland Drive. Request: An appeal pursuant to Community Development Code Section 4-501.A.1. of an administrative interpretation by the Community Development Coordinator finding that a six-foot fence cannot be located between the primary structure (detached dwelling) and the Moreland Drive right-of-way on property located at 1312 Dickenson Drive, zoned Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR). Neighborhood Associations: Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition and Board of County Commissioners. Assigned Planner: Mark Parry, AICP, Senior Planner Member Quattrocki moved to accept Mark Parry as an expert witness in the fields of redevelopment planning, comprehensive planning, annexation implementation, zoning, land use/rezoning applications, land development, general planning, code amendments, landscape ordinance, and special area plans/overlay districts. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Community Development 2020-12-15 7 Senior Planner Mark Parry provided a PowerPoint presentation summarizing the Staff Report, including Code citations and property photos. The property owner had appealed the Planning & Development Director's Zoning Interpretation Letter which clarified that a proposed 6-foot fence along Moreland Drive between the principal structure at 1312 Dickenson Drive and the public right-of-way is not permitted per Code. Mr. Parry said the Code regulates fence heights based on a fence's location in relation to the principal structure and public right-of-way. The subject property is a corner lot with a front property line to the north along Moreland Drive and a front property line to the east along Dickenson Drive. The maximum permitted height of a fence on the north property line in front of the principal structure is 3 feet. If set back 3 feet from the north property line with required landscaping, a fence may be up to 4-feet tall. Mr. Parry said to be taller than 4 feet, the fence must be 1) consistent with the character and placement of any structures and setbacks on the adjoining properties OR 2) the side of the property must be adjacent to an arterial or collector right-of-way. The adjoining property does not have a 6-foot fence between the principal structure and Moreland Drive and neither adjacent street is designated by the City's Comprehensive Plan as an arterial or collector street. Mr. Parry said the appellant asserts the Section 3- 804.D.1 requirement is met because the proposed 6-foot solid fence between the principal structure and front property line along Moreland Drive is consistent with the character of the existing 4-foot chainlink fence between the principal structure and front property line along Moreland Drive on the adjoining property to the west. The Code prohibits chainlink fences in front of principal structures. The applicant provided no evidence of structures on the adjacent property to the west that are consistent with a 6-foot fence. Mr. Parry said the proposed 6-foot solid fence is inconsistent with the character of the neighboring non-opaque chainlink fence. The Community Development Coordinator did not misconstrue or incorrectly interpret provisions of the Code. Staff's interpretation of the Code is consistent with the department's 22-year application of the fence code. Staff recommends denial of the appeal. In response to questions, he said hedges of any height were permitted outside visibility triangles. Fences behind the leading edge of a house could be 6-feet tall. Attorney Jaclyn Palazzolo, representing the applicant, said staff had incorrectly interpreted the Code, the property owner's request met the general purpose of the Code, and approval of the fence would not be detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare. She said the subject property's north property line along Moreland Drive is a side property line. She said Code language referenced a structure not a fence when referring to the character of the neighboring property. She said a property's character cannot change based on a chainlink fence. Community Development 2020-12-15 8 Attorney Palazzolo presented multiple photos of properties within a mile of the subject property on corner lots with 6-foot solid fences along the property line between the principal structure and street next to adjoining properties with no fences or shorter ones. She said the City had permitted one referenced 6-foot fence in July 2020. She said rejection of the property owner's application did not conform with the Code as the City permitted 6-foot fences to be installed under the same circumstances on nearby properties along property lines between principal structures and streets. Attorney Palazzolo expressed concern the applicant had young children and feared for their safety when playing in the backyard. She said the property owner wanted to protect the children behind a privacy fence so they could not be seen by children at the corner bus stop, pedestrians and dogs, and any of the 80 sex offenders who lived within a quarter mile. Attorney Palazzolo said the owner of the adjoining property had written a letter in support of the 6-foot fence, stating the property owner's intention to replace the chainlink fence with a 6-foot solid fence; the fences on the adjoining properties would match. Assistant City Attorney Mike Fuino said Attorney Palazzolo had not shown any photos of the subject property's adjoining property. Concern was expressed that strangers could see the children in the backyard from the street. In response to a suggestion that the property owner install opaque material inside the pool cage or plant hedges for privacy, Attorney Palazzolo said the children were visible from the street while playing in the backyard and the property owner did not have a green thumb. Attorney Palazzolo and Mr. Parry presented contradictory interpretations of the Code regarding the definition of side and front property lines on corner lots. Mr. Parry said after review of all of the appellant's photos, including property visits, staff determined none of Attorney Palazzolo photo examples was relevant. In response to questions, he said the application would have been approved had the abutting property had a 6-foot fence along the Moreland Drive property line; the Code only permitted a 4- foot fence consistent with the character and placement of the 4-foot chainlink fence along the Moreland Drive property line on the adjoining property. While Section 3-903 allowed fences on property lines, that Section did not address fence heights. Attorney Palazzolo said according to Section 3-903, the north property line along Moreland Drive was a side property line, not a front one. She said Code referenced a structure, not a fence. She said a 6-foot fence on the abutting property extended beyond the pool enclosure. She said 6-foot fences on properties abutting properties Community Development 2020-12-15 9 without fences should not have been approved elsewhere while the subject property owner's request was denied. Discussion ensued with comments that the subject property did not comply with exceptions that would have permitted a 6 -foot fence: 1) the requested fence was not consistent with the character and placement of any structures and setbacks on the adjoining properties and 2) the side of the subject property was not adjacent to an arterial or collector right-of-way. Member Barker moved to deny the appeal, Case APP2020-00002, and affirm the Staffs development order denying the application based on the evidence and testimony presented in the application, the Staff Report and at today's hearing, and hereby adopt the Staffs Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law stated in the Staff Report. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. DIRECTOR'S ITEMS t Citizens Guide to the Community Development Board Planning & Development Director Gina Clayton presented the draft of the Citizens Guide to the Community Development Board developed by Assistant Planning & Development Director Lauren Matzke and the Public Communications Department. As recommended by the Board, meeting notices will include a Zink to the guide. After some minor tweaks, staff will distribute the guide to the Clearwater Coalition and post it on the City's website. Staff was complimented for the great job they did job putting together this helpful information and organizing the guide so it is not overwhelming or intimidating. Ms. Clayton requested the board consider changing the start time for the Community Development Board to 1:30 p.m. to provide attendees time to eat lunch. It was recommended the Board amend its appeal procedures to allow the Appellant to present the appeal first, prior to staffs response. H. ADJOURN The meeting adjourned at 2:35 p.m. Attest: Board Repptter Community Development 2020-12-15 C air — Commu opment Board 10 FORM 8B MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT FOR. COUNTY, MUNICIPAL, AND OTHER LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS E OF BOARD,.000N COMI SION. AUTHORITY OR COMM,T F.E 4e--FITNAME--MIDDLE n MAILINGIADDR`��"J / ,I 3r I a 5 Sr gerCil a. ill_ cIC- lit/ Pfr' pin e //fL 5 DATE ON WHiCH VOTE OC URREll Min SOL THE BO A.BRD, CO L. COMMISSIO, ; AUTHORITY'OR COMMITTEE ON MC ElWEIS.AUNIT OF: CI COUNTY O'OTHER LOCAL AGENCY NAME OfF POOLrrICAL SUBDM ON: MY POSITION I5: f C e.94,14e J ELECTIVE YYApPOINTIVE WHO MUST FiLE FORM BB This form is for use by any. person serving at the county, city, or other local level of government onan appointed or elected board, council, commission, authority, or committee. It applies to mernbers of advisory and non -advisory bodies who are presented with a voting conflict of interest. under Section 112.3143, Florida Statutes. Your responsibilities under the law when faced with voting on a measure in which you have a conflict of interest will vary greatly depending on whether you hold an elective or appointive. position. For thls reason, please pay close attention to the instructions on this form before completing and filing the form. INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 1123143, FLORIDA STATUTES A person holding elective or.appotntiVe county, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which would inure to his ocher special private.gain or loss. Each elected or appointed local officer also'MUSTABSTAIN from knowingly voting on .a measure which would inure to the special gain or loss of a. principal (other than a government agency) by whom he or she is retained (including the parent, subsidiary, or sibling organization of a principal by which he or she Is retained); to the special private gain or loss of a relative; or to the special private gain or toss of a business associate. Commissioners of community redevelopment. agencies (CRA4 under Sec. 163.356 or 163,357, F.S., and officers of Independent .special tax districts elected on a one -acre, one -vote basis are not prohibited from voting in that capacity. For purposes of this law, a "retatiVe" includes only the officer's father, mother, son, daughter, husband, wife; brother, sister, father-in-law, mother-in-law. son-in-law, and daughter-in-law. A'business associate" means any person or entity engaged in or carrying on a business enterprise with the officer as a partner, joint venturer, coowner of property- or corporate shareholder (where the shares of the corporation are not listed on any national or regional stock exchange). k e ♦ M • f ♦ 4 ♦ - f " ELECTED OFFICERS; In addition to abstaining from voting in the situations described above, you must disclose the conflict: PRIOR TO THE VOTE, BEiNG TAKEN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of your interest: in the measure on which you are abstaining from voting; and WITHIN 1.5 DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by completing and filing this form with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who should incorporate the form. In the minutes. APPOINTED OFFICERS: Although you must abstain from voting in the situations described above, you are not prohibited by Section 112.3143 from otherwise participating in these. matters. However, you must disclose the nature. of the conflict before making any attempt to Influence the decision, whether orally or in writing and whether made by you or at your direction. 'IF YOU INTEND TO MAKE ANY ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION PRIOR TO THE MEETING AT WHICH THE VOTE WILL BE TAKEN: • You must complete and file .this form (before making any attempt to Influence the decision) with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who wilt incorporate the form in the minutes. (Continued on page 2) CE FORM 813 - EFF. 11/2013 PAGE 1 Adopted by reference in Rule 34-7,010(1)(f), F.A.C. APPOINTED OFFICERS (continued) • A copy of the form must be provided Immediately to the other members of the agency. • The form must be read publicly at the next meeting after the -form is fled, IF YOU MAKE NO ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECIS)ON EXCEPT BY DISCUSSION AT THE MEETING. • You must disclose orally the nature of your conflict in the measure before participating. • You must complete the form and file It within 15 days after the vote occurs with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who must incorporate the form in the minutes. A copy of the form must be provided Immediately to the other members of the agency. and The form must be read publicly at the next meeting after the form Is filed. 1, DISCLOSURE OF LOCAL OFFICER'S INTEREST /21/6- , hereby disclose that on , 20 20 : (a) A measure Game or will come before my agency which (check one or more) inured to my special private gain or lass; inured to the special gain or loss of my business associate, inured to the special gain or lossof my relative, inured to the special gain or loss of »i/fpnc 7Bh/e_%1?�jp (/&r whom.I am retained; or f° /c yt inured to the special gain or loss of / , which Is the parent subsidiary, or sibling organization or subsidiary of a principal which has retained me. (b) The measure before my agency and the nature of my conflicting Interest In the measure is as follows: , by surit,//c% par °(/fin" S -f cv41,- -0901K - 09©1K I_uf 2oa0 RE z WW -/000/ If disclosure of specific information would violate confidentiality or privilege pursuant to law or rules governing attorneys, a public officer, who is also an attorney, may comply with the disclosure requirements of this section by disclosing the nature of the Interest in such a way as to provide the public with notice of the conflict. 2 e Date Filed r Signature NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES §112.317, A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRED DISCLOSURE CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: IMPEACHMENT. REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION, REDUCTION IN SALARY, REPRIMAND, OR A CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED $10,000. CE FORM 813 - EFF. 11/2013 Adopted by reference in Rule 34-7 010(1)(Q, FAC, PAGE2 CITY OF CLEARWATER C1.raaw.vrr-:x P1.ANNruc & I)i vr.:r.op.w NT, P, ST 011:1.!' 13o 4748, (h i yR' vT1:R, FLoi ill: 33758-4748 NIc:!1 j. S[ RviCas 13i'1 J)INC, 100 SocTH Avi M:r., (t.r.,vRy v I.R, FLOR:u,v 33756 1 Ll E I O\r 27) 562-4567 TO: Community Development Board Members FROM: Gina Clayton, Planning and Development Director COPIES: Michael Fuino Assistant City Attorney; Attorney Jay Daigneault, Susan Chase, Documents and Records Specialist / Pat Sullivan, Board Reporter SUBJECT: Agenda Items December 15, 2020 DATE: December 08, 2020 Community Development Board Packets being distributed contain the following: Unapproved minutes of November 17, 2020 Level Two Applications (Items 1-5) 1. FLD2020-09018 — 1280 & 1298 Lakeview Road Assigned Planner: Kevin Nurnberger, Senior Planner Yes: --y/ f�No: 2. FLD2019-08023 —1101 Druid Road - Assigned Planner: Vinod Kadu LEED AP, Senior Planner Yes: f 2//y -alio: 3. FLD2020-09019 —1025 LaSalle Assigned Planner: Mark Parry, SICP, Senior Planner Yes: j Z/ 1'2- No: 4. FLD2009-08026B Parcel A 309 Coronado Drive 5. FLD2009-080276 Parcel A 309 Coronado Drive Assigned Panner: Mark Parry, ACIP, Senior Planner Yes:I 2i / i/ZAlo: Level Three Applications (items 1-4) 1. LUP2020-10001 — 1280 and 1298 Lakeview Road 2. REZ2020-10002 — 1298 Lakeview Road Assigned Planner: Diego Guevara Senior Planner Yes: % 2/,7,o: 3. LUP2020-10002 —2250 Nursery Road 4. REZ2020-10002 — 2250 Nursery Road Assignk ?land : Kyle Brotherton, Senior Planner Yes: /(y/Zi No: Appeal (items 1) 1. APP2020-00002 —1312 Dickerson Drive Assigned Planner Mark Parry, AICP, Senior Planner Yes: /22/6 /jJ No: I have conducted a persoryal inve'Ration on the personal site visit to the following properties. Signatu - r Print Name: L> // 2,C-2?CP -C. I/. Q1X-5 't/ Prepared by: Sherry L. Watkins, Administrative Assistant Date: zv CITY OF CLEARWATE R ( .i.MRv y i:a PI vvv]M & Di.v1 i.OPnu_NT, P,sT 0111(1 Box. 4748, (a.r:vitvr:vTeas, Fi i in.1 33758-4748 Ml 11111, SE Vir.is B191DLN(, 1(111 S(xTi3 MYir11.11 (.i.r_v{;y VTI,R, Pi ORII)v 33736 Tr.i.mnoNI: «72'7 5(2 4567 TO: Community Development Board Members FROM: Gina Clayton, Planning and Development Director COPIES: Michael Fuino Assistant City Attorney; Attorney Jay Daigneault, Susan Chase, Documents and Records Specialist / Pat Sullivan, Board Reporter SUBJECT: Agenda Items December 15, 2020 DATE: December 08, 2020 Community Development Board Packets being distributed contain the following: Unapproved minutes of November 17, 2020 Level Two Applications (Items 1-5) 1. FLD2020-09018 — 1280 & 1298 Lakeview Road Assigned anner: Kevin Nurnberger, Senior Planner Yes: No: 2. FLD2019-08023 —1101 Druid Road - Assigned PI ner: Vinod Kadu LEED AP, Senior Planner Yes: No: 3. FLD2020-09 —1025 LaSalle Assigned anner: Mark Parry, SICP, Senior Planner Yes: No: 4. FLD2009-08026 Parcel A 309 Coronado Drive 5. FLD2009-08 B Parcel A 309 Coronado Drive Assigned anner: Mark Parry, ACIP, Senior Planner Yes: No: Level Three Applications (items 1-4) 1. LUP2020-10001 — 1280 and 1298 Lakeview Road 2. REZ2020-10002 — 1298 Lakeview Road Assigned nner: Diego Guevara Senior Planner Yes: No: 3. LUP2020-10002 — 2250 Nursery Road 4. REZ2020-10002 — 2250 Nursery Road Assigned Planner: Kyle Brotherton, Senior Planner Yes: No: Appeal (items 1) 1. APP2020-0 02 — 1312 Dickerson Drive Assign lanner Mark Parry, AICP, Senior Planner Yes: No: condu Print Nam Prepared by: p—�si�;,,•,•sti _ erry L. Wat ation on the personal site visit to the followi ► • properties. Date: ins, Administrative Assistant CITY OF CLEARWATER (.!.r.vaWAmI ANNIM. & Di ��ra.o�>�u v , 1' R:•1 Oi+;cz Box 4748, CAT aRWATNe, FLORIDA 33758-4748 5Ii NI(IP1. Si Rv x:rs Bt a DIN(,, 1(8) SoLnI iM' tau, Av [ NL:I . CLEAR ;x,�r��.x FLOKaA 33756 t'Hotii ( 27) 562-4567 TO: Community Development Board Members FROM: Gina Clayton, Planning and Development Director COPIES: Michael Fuino Assistant City Attorney; Attorney Jay Daigneault, Susan Chase, Documents and Records Specialist / Pat Sullivan, Board Reporter SUBJECT: Agenda Items December 15, 2020 DATE: December 08, 2020 Community Development Board Packets being distributed contain the following: Unapproved minutes of November 17, 2020 Level Two Applications (Items 1-5) 1. FLD2020-09018 — 1280 & 1298 Lakeview Road Assigned Planner: Kevin Nurnberger, Senior Planner Yes: No: 2. FLD2019-08023 —1101 Druid Road - Assigned Planner: Vinod Kadu LEED AP, Senior Planner Yes: No: ><-- 3. 3. FLD2020-09019 —1025 LaSalle Assigned Planner: Mark Parry, SICP, Senior Planner Yes: No: y 4. FLD2009-08026B Parcel A 309 Coronado Drive 5. FLD2009-08027B Parcel A 309 Coronado Drive Assigned Planner: Mark Parr , ACIP, Senior Planner Yes: No: Level Three Applications (items 1-4) 1. LUP2020-10001 — 1280 and 1298 Lakeview Road 2. REZ2020-10002 — 1298 Lakeview Road Assigned Planner: Diego Gu', Senior Planner Yes: No: 3. LUP2020-10002 — 2250 Nursery Road 4. REZ2020-10002 — 2250 Nursery Road Assigned Planner: Kyle Brotherton, Senior Planner Yes: No: Abs-fit%h -- c6 n tet- Appeal (items 1) 1. APP2020-00002 —1312 Dickerson Drive Assigned Planner Mark Parry, AICP, Senior Planner Yes: No: �c I have conducted a personal inveion on the personal site visit to the following properties. Signature: Print Name: rl a-I'I 13zi t".6,'• Prepared by: Sherry L. Watkins, Administrative Assistant Date: /5' 2a