The URL can be used to link to this page

CU99-10 CD 99-10 510 Highland Ave S Florida Pet Care Inc. Reoe\?l' CITY OF CLEARWATER CFNI'RAL PERMIT'J'ING DEPARTMENT 10050. MYRTLB AVE.,J'l" ILOOR CLEARWATER. FLORIDA 3461' PHONE (813)-50-4567 FAX (113) sc.4S7' 0/ cu.flC;99~OO 0 CONDnlONALUSEAPPUCAnoN (PleaSe M1l or Type. BIIc:k "* 0nI>>t , . PROPERTY ~ERS(S). (ATTACH PROOF PER ., - ~~~ : AMll3oE~Ne I ,ISOl ZONiNG D~TRICT: lAND USE CLASSlFICAT1ON: lAND AAEA: o '- A 0 6- 7 s6l> PARCEL NUMBER: (Ttlb WormaUon is awlable fi'om )OUI'\IX~ Of' oonl8C;I. PMIlat C01.1ntr ~ s omce at ~207, r more than one reef number atIad1e % x n ild1 " .;:~ - ~,,------ ce'J.O' 0 \\EST ,q E-SdJF,f.tf flit- ~ A , : P,4 rf/3,tit c..- fI ;Q. 6 WFORMA nON IN SUPPORT OF REQUEST: B () It.. d Ifl6- .......0 8. A cHlJiT 10 rile.. cITY . Will f3e A.~,?1cd,n.e4 HOURS OF OPERAnON: Weekdaya i-I ~ ,.-.,r WHkenda. s.n 6 -Po. ~ CU1SIl. St'1l/ - BOUN DARY SURVEY LOT 20 I BLOCK A BREEZE HilL PINELLAS COUNTY) FLORIDA Ce rll hed 1'0. Henry & Mnry Ann Boerner AmSouth Bank of Florida MacFd r l ant:', Ferguson & McMu 11 en. p, A . ~'iTst funerl(:arl T1lle Insurance Company SEe TION !4 I TOWNSHIP 3L S, I HANGE Ilea C .Lnys rc [el ('need Lo the ~~e:.; t. Rl.qhL-of-t.ta:y L.Lne of 1I1yh),10.1 Ave" being SOOol)5'41"E: (a~sumell) '- ~ 'l'hlS survey prepared w1thoul the benefit of a complete and up-lo-date 'l'.1tlc RepOrt. I'a~ement".; oc otber encUlllbrance~ may exist that clrc nOL shown hereon. LOT l . BLOCK A WAfER fEN o e'N,ME +;. ",," 'cu. , . '0' 0' 0: ~I POl.E . 0' METER 0 ; - -- - - - - - - - - - - - .......... ~ - - - ~ ...... ~ - - ---...,. ~ ~ -- ... MICHAEL BAKER ASSOCIATES SV/lVEYORS ANO MAPPERS a PLANNERS 9 SOU TH SAffORD AVENUE , .. 1ARPON SPRINGS I FLORIDA H669 ... :...... Ii . : ." .... Iill.)) ~Ha':lOl6 '-AX (III'H 'il.)6-.215-6.; . AUf/1OR'l'A1lO" . 1. It .Olli I '?~'? f.l' 589019'081.[ 261 C) z 5 ~ ~ u ~ ,.. (( 0 l- I/) W Z 0 Z42 LOT I . BLOCK A CI: o ::a; .0 II: <\II ~ (oj ..J 62.60:1 ~~ ~ f;'-Ul~" --;;- EA$E"'UtT 'N '" N' 2..9 '"" \ (> <1 N lo::: g ..> 40 III _rc; ~ 0 ~ .... L ' = Hi -flu - - -- ~i o ...... :i: .:-- ..- ""'n.. (1)- "01 00 ~~ e;, N 0'" z> ocr 00 ,::bJ --li o UJ ( ASP~~l--~ .,. N N8901712~1I W ~~- ROGERS ST (flold) (80' R/W) TURNER S1 (plot) SCAl E: \": 20' DRAWN OVlle SVRV{YEO BYIAC - F B 532 :'1:; ~.;.. .. 111... . 'II . DATE PGIB 9-2-"-96 flt)lJl'Ioor U"6EHD AHO 488Af"\I'tAno~s 9TE" TElEPHONE. ~ ~ COVERED I P) . PL AT DIME"rlSIOH . .M) .. HE ASURE 0 01 IIll III S' OM . (0.. OE l 0 0 I NENSIOIt . La. U CENC;;!O lJUSlt.I[SS. N C S ' NO c.ORrltR Sf T t E f>. (OC; E Of PlI\I"f!>lE N T C /S " CONCRETE SLAB. SH 8 I) . $E"I NAIL AI'lD DISK L.B <I0tlil, .cas . CONCRtTE Bl.O(:K STRUCTUNE. PAN . PEIUUHEIH Rt.Ff~t.I'IC€O NONIlt.lE1H "" CO, C"ORP ilEARINa R/vt . RIGltT-Of - WAY. S , ,olin. . l " fllST , W' W.[ST , iii. HORTH. CONC . COffCIlEl E. A. ARC . H. RAPlllS. ell . CliO"... . SIR' SEl 1/2' IRO/ll ROD .. 4036 . I'lft . fDUMO IROI'I ROO I'CN. ~ "OUHO COHCRETe UO,hJIIlEHT np. fOU<<O IROlt PIPE. I'CP , Pffl/>6ANt:H1 r01HlWL POI" 1 ^ . . CE Cl.HINt.R COli' CQIIERt.O l,...1 . t:fNTIlAl ANGLE. t. Cf"'TERUNE. X 000. EXIS flNG ELEVATION. IE L . ELEVATION, LFE . LowEST fLOOF'c El EVAflON. FE N COI'I ' 1'-(1'1 . ---- 0"- I 'tEllEr.... C:ERlIF'l' TliAT TilE AlJACttEO ShEICI~ E SUl':vEY l~ TRUE IlNO CORR-fct ArlO 1111\1 rllEHE ",ot NO :;r.CftO...CH Nf"T S UNI E 55 !oHO\fitt liE ftE O'j f1,u[' 1 T Et. T sTilE "'INI!oW1lI u:cmc ilL S T Ilt40AR03 $I' f ~Ofl1" 11';1 1 liE Fl.l!o S 1A 1E llQl\t40 I.Of 'SIJ""/€ (Oil So ;\Nf) ",AWl:.flS AND CI~AP1"" 61\..' - 6-, ~ J\ \. I'IOTE ;"'l()T\Il!lUO Wlfk<lUl l"e- SIGNATolI"E "'''0 ' lie: OfllOll'I,"- ftA~SEO UIlL l)f A flDRIM UCEHSIE"D SURil"e: \fOR A IW NAl'f't'"Il '/ , ~ -.... ~ ~-- 0:. '" :::> u u ~ <"J N 30 00' __ --~--_..----- , . 3' ...... DOC Z~ <{- -.J :r: t!) :r: \0 'E, 'I -1I Ci -'1 ;I' ""'- '-' '" 111 11 ,~ '1-' , . 1[1 'V CO " :"J G::- >- II ::3: 1J '1 -.1 r;;S 11 ..L 1=1 l" IT, ,\ . 'I' 'I 'J! . I~I " :j (..1 l' I //~ / L-, 10 - '2: -f}te -- ,;: ....----=-,..""-;-0;- Ali ..;- .<>u p.o.u .,,,-,",1> k "{ it ~ Q.. ~ flI () <t . . . .. the undorI5gnId. ~ tbI foIIowlnl: THE rmwER" OWNER OR DULY AU11tORIZED REPRElEHTAT1VE MUll ATTEND MENUNO. ......,,, filpresent "sp,lIt'''' . 1M bUrInt WON the PIaMlftIIftd ZonInt IoIrCI, . ....IIIM ~ ...,.... the property owner or buIIMP owner nemIng . cetIIJft GChrIr penon at flPruentIdIw MUST HAW BEEN fILED AT THE CENTRAL PERMITT1NG DEPARTMEHT PRIOR TO THI! HEARING. OTHERWISE. THIS CABE WILL NOT IE HEARD M SCHEDULED. STATE Of FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINEL.lAS 8wom to and lubscrlbed before me thll "" day of 1I.!lL by /I. It1 /11 II M //Au WI} & L #E/V" me Indlor has produced JAlI/vA,4.1 . A.D.. . whO~RlRy kno.;n~ entiflcatJon. ;; ~ Ray'e8 J ..... . j.Mv CorrmIulcn CC88:n38 '''::/ Erpaes Seclember 22 2001 IIFonn. CondIIJonIf UN $tIndafd. 2"'.". t.,o.<<lOI "'to t+:hJc, and Mary Ann Boerner Boerner ComnFrom H WillIam Van Wagenen (;J. f.:).) \. 'IIHN ~ GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS. that We Henry L. Boerner and Mary Ann Boerner 90 Second Street Mineola, New York USOl have made, named. constituted and appomted, and by these presents do make, name, constitute and appomt H. William Van Wagencn 147 N. Belcher Road.. Suite 1 Largo, FL 33771 our true and lawful attorney for and in our name. place. and stead, WIth full power and authority to do and perform aU and every act and thing whatsoever. necessary, reqUisite or proper to be done, as fully. to all intents and purposes, as we might or could do If personally present, with full power of substltutIon and revocation, hereby ranfymg and conflflI1lng all that H William Van Wagenen shall lawfully do or cause to be done by vu1ue hereof This General power of Attorney shall remain in effect for a penod oftlurty days from the date hereof If tlus General power of Attorney is termmated by operatton of law. any person acting in rehance upon It Wlthout notice of such termmatlOn shall be held harmless IN WITNESS WHEREOF, tlus General power of Attorney has been executed by Henry L Boerner and Mary Ann Boerner on January 20. 1999 at Mineola, New York ~- ~tula~ /'~-l-?V- MarylAnn Boerner 01/20/99 WED 17 08 (TX/Rl '0 64061 ~ H8~ and Mary Ann Boerner Boerner ComnFrom H William Van Wagenen n7.531.149O 1120199 17 00- 40 Page:3 of :3 State of New York) : II County of Nassau ) On this II )..019 t; J before me personally appeared Henry L Boerner, to me known to be/the Person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that Henry L Boerner executed the same as His free act and deed. ,55 j~~, Notary Public YVONNE M POMERICO Notary Pubhc. Stale of New YorII. No 01 PQ4 752348 Quahfled In Nassau County nC; CommIssIOn Expires September JO,1'J.' I~ State of New York.) County of Nassau ) On this ,/.J. &</'1'1 , before me personally appeared Mary Ann Boerner, to me known 0 be 'the person descnbed in and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that Mary Ann Boerner executed the same as Her free act and deed. /7 J L/~~ fU. 7ll r ~-r..-t-c,- I Notary Public YVONNE M POMERICO Notary Public Stare of New YOtk No 01P04752348 C Qualified In Nassau C ommlSS on E ounty t1 f I xprres September 30. 19...J- \ I 1\ n, ?n' Qll YoFf) 1" OR fT'( IR'< '0 6"'061 . L) .~~.~ . ,----u{:'tlt I It H INST . ;6~312712 OV If( 1995 10:41AH . '" PUI'ARBD BY MD, ~ TO I ,./ HARRY S. CLINE, Esquire Macfarlane Ferguson ~ McMullen tOO Clevoland Street Post office 8o~ 1669 clearwater. Florida 34611 OFF~i~L~;S COUNTY FLA U23 PC; 1175 R~C -.. -- CJ --~ liP.' .. H.Y;".. I (f'o~ !fIl.'RR~ DEED -" THIS INDENTURE made this ~ day of -doT- , l.996, by ,and between LOUXS a. AVSUECIt, A MDrflf'd PERSON AS TO" AN' 'I1NDIYmZD 1/3 ~T of the County of p1ne118s, in.the State of'Flo~id&, party of the First part. whose mailing address ie / 3 f7) - 3 f~ :'~~~f"; - iJ~" - - , ~ r;;: .A:;~:ff-E~A.!.' F':: '.-371;13 ~ ~' and HBNRY BOBRNER AND MARY ANN BOKRNBR, his wife, of ,the County of plnellas; In~e~Staie-or-Flor1da, ~arty of the Second Part, whose mailing address. is 215 t/larjOfie t!+) M.tinntl~tJ NY f/D30 ,. .' . . 1 - ~; j1I f ,~II .. WITNESSE#' I~ }II " I I That the ssid Party of the First Part, for and '~n connide~- ~ __ _ ... /'1 I atipn 01:: tne sum of Ten Dollars ($10 001 to h1.m in hind pf.id by the 1 . i said Party of t~e Second Part. the recelpt whereof is hereby \ I .' ckn~ledged, has granted, barga1n~d and sold to the sai1 Party of the Second Part, l}1S heirs and asslgns forever, the following descr1.bed land, situate lY1ng and be1ng ~n the County of P1.nellas, State of Florida, to~w~t 01 Fi~..o;:;C;"'G r ,1; ~ LOt 20, Block A BREEZE HILL, accord1.ng to the Piat :. , _ _~...3Q. thereof, ilS recorded in Plat Book 13, Page (a) 66, Public _ ~ . records fo p1.nellas Couanty, Flor1.da , I I I - ~ I I 0-~2 : o. K' -=10- 1 ~ l-..J____ o . tht;; And SubJect to 1996, real estate taxes, restr1.ct1.ons, reservat1.ons and easements of record - parce-l I-B, No j',t ~r...ntcc':l Tax I 0/ I the sald Party of the First Part does hereby fully warrant the ,title to sa.1d lan1:1, and w111 defend the same agcuTIst, the lawful clalms,of all pers~ns whomsoever , ' " l ...--., c , - I ~.... ,.- . . , I : I , ; ...... ~ )>11I ,~ ~ <CD . . , ~, AI fIIi . J o'j .. .... -J AI n) o , .... cr 0) - CD 'l~ ''< l 0 .1 .~ ., 1 I I , ,: ~ ' I " J " I : ' ~I " . ' ~ &_.-- ~ ~ . " . ~ " . , ,. , .. . . ' " f, I ~ I I ! I " . .... ..:. ," ~ -~ ~--- - -:--1 'I " ... , 0 . " - PlNELt.AS cotnin FLA. ' OFF. REC, BK '5-23 ,c; 1176 IN WITNESS ~ERSOP, the sald p~rty of the Fint Part has ereunto sat hie ha~~ Beal t:.he day and year first abbve wr1t- en. , " i~o:.. ..~::..~ ..11~"" - J / ~ ~- - -~t~~-- :-~-:." SEAL1 l - Pr nt N . . ,#7' UIS Q. AVERBECK ~ .. := ~'-~ il75"~~ prin~ame Ai' ;!rL. I ~Ij('" -..- - -- :STATB OF FLORIDA coUNTY OF PINELLAS I HERES'i CERTiFY, that 00 this day perspnally appeared .before~ n_ --m.e,-anofITcer duTy----autnorHea--t:o -a-amrniste- - - -:tllii""li - . take-- acknowledgments,~ LOUIS G AVERBECK, to me ersonally 1m or who bas produced' ~8 ent1 1ca n and iU\d known to me to be the individual described in and ....ho executed the foregoing instrument and he acknowledged before me that he executed the same for the purposes ..therein expressed. ~i'l'llESS ..,. band aDd Of~icUl ...1 ~ ilL;. t..(f ", .sid County and State. this .dL- day of Oct ~. 19~6. .--' . ~- -Print Name My Comln1.ssion Exp1reS': ~ \.. \Dl.TA\U:L\1A5\N<SQC'fll\1)OEIJll:ll lll>O I . . ----- - ---- --- - I J---- _.:.:.. --~ ." ~-- - - ... < .' - ,.. 'S,.jl.TE OF FlORIDA ~--:""'\4 I 'IP"~C6r :'~h~..l, al(~. aS1t1e- :..~:;' ,..I, tt>e . d '&'>>fdS ~;J. t . .. ~ Tl:l1 In) 01 ',:\ ~f . .:i ~ . - ~ ....t; ,.~._:r' _ l~' ,~... , e,: . - __----:- 'I-. _ _ .,.._ ~ : sC070544 Cos tt-i~i99b 01 OEO-AVERBECK' RECORDING . i OOC STAMP - Dh21~ - j R~ ,14 08: 1S: C!r ;10150 , ., 70' ~M, 1';.50 TOIN.:". - ;15.70 CkCCJ\ Mf. T~O:', , ".:. 7~ , . ClW{Ut~. i.GO ~ 'J ~ ! - , o I - .. I. to . 1 -I ....J1t.:- ... ~ .., J , - )>11 <CI ~cn .. ... - ~n _0 CI'a '< · ;- ""~~ ~ uli Ii nlUIU ,.. .., ~ \, ~n 5. ~ · If. . "'5 24 _ ~15 171 'ill-". ~ ~ 1 2. lumu I "2 ~ ~ "'3 03"} 3 ~ 22 2J 24 , 2t ~ ,~ 12 . 21 PI 5 ,13 2 ..-ill'" ~ "', e=; .!!! - '" .' $ I ""-- di~~~H11 20" ~..,~ ,- 20. ~~ ~ II ~ . A 1 ~~~,._-~ ( '1'~'~S1i~ I to. ~ 7 III 11 1 1: 11 '%' 22 2324' ~- 21 ~~ I 01 ': '2 ~ . 111 'I 10 -.. ~ Is , 3 2 II ";:11'. ~., ~ II I I' l eo I a " 5 14 1: J: 'Y" i/ 3 4 15 I Ie .... Sf. I u. 151 IO.H" " GUJ' \10 BAY .. ==-- - - - -- - COURT tIl IUU --I. - au (iS~ 1 II :la CiA I ~t It n u 4~3 i 7 I I I 10 I .. I 10 , Z ~~ U ~z 2:1 'T 2 1 10 9 . 7 6 S 2 1 1 2 3 1'~ 2~ Y. ~" 1 ~ '''';1 I II>> 'I .. III - 'I 20 '2 13 r' II 17 II ... e 38 23 - I , I ! , I 1'1 Ii. rl 17 S IH ... 37 '" 24 ROGERS S1REEJ I.. 1fI~, .. lIP 2$- I I 31 I .. IS 7 .. .. 3S..!j "' I , ~ , i t i~ ~! ~ I , 26 z ~~ ", em ", I 3 2 I 1 1 I , 6 3 2 1 14 I NJ' ~~ 27 i I "'", I_ III ., 21 III I ~ 18 1'1 20 " 13 14 15 II 17 'I 11 20 III "' WJ ]1 JO &II I ~ t i 't. ii u Ii I i 12 'f- 10- '1 2t ~ I ;. u , r I III I t , STREET ~ . J "a ; t ~ I~ ~ J.. ~ .. J;-- Air 101 ~ I 0 i I - . ~ :1 I II ,I ;1 --- 3 2 1 I IQ , a :" .. - J-. 40 4' .57 ~ 59 60 I .'<11 ) M" I. m '8 I. .- to ?f"l Ii " '" l' t" o. ,. .ti . .. .ft ..,. 42 AI CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST NAME BoernerNan Wagenen CU # 99 10 ATlAS PAGE: 297A r 4o-i !.. ~ . , I r · f ofL .,. ,..,..". 0 . 4..J . . . 0 .I.C, , ..ouao ve_ I ~ II !I --,j CDCIICl. I UIlC lID. _ , . ,0 I b 10.00. InDCl lID. IU If I f 1 CU99 10 ~ . ~19 99 !!128. / . John a,..unson 72746~G72B p, 1 JOHN MORGAN BRUN~U~ AnOHlil!Y A}/D lOOl'fSRLQR .tJ J..A.w 1474 Jm,<.I>..vo HlI6.S CO\!RT C LlL.U.wA1'....., FU"o1:oTT"I.I. ..~ 7Sc::. 11>:1 RPlln/'OJ: (727) ""'7 - ::I1.:tl TJ:U!COI'I.llI (~e?l 46b'6~~ FACSIMILE_TRANSMITTAL TO: ~ SINTA McCALL, SENIOR PLANNER FAX "'562-4576 FROM: JOHN MORGAN BRUNSON, ESQ. DATE: March 19, 1999 RE: cu 99-10 This tran5m~ttal cons~sts of ;:) pages, including th~s page. If you do not receIve all of these pages, please call me. o ~~~9~~~ 0 1/ PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF CLEARWATER The Info=mat~on contained ~n thIS facsimile message ~s attorney pr~vileged and oonf~dential Lnformation 1ntended only for tho use of the lndlvldual or entIt}' named above. If the read.er of thIS message IS not the intended recipient, you are hereby notlfled that ~QY disseminat1on, d1str~bution or copy of this commun_cat~on ~s str~ctly prohlb~ted. If you have recelved thlS communlcat~on in error, please 1wmed1ately not~fy us by telephone and return the or~ginal message to us at the above address v~a the U.S. Postal Service. Thank you. V ! " f ,8 ,t Joh~ Brunson 7274r--728 p.Z / JO~N MO~0^N nHUN~ON A:rrOK.~II:Y "'0 COU1fSln.oa AT L4.W 1474 ,Jl)RI'\,tl.N Mil... ('<lUlU C:1...:tARWAl EN F ~QH I D4 33756 TIn g PilON Ie (727) ....47 <1126 tllll!;<"OPIPR (7~7J ".65.1:>726 March 19, 1999 Sinta McCall, Senio~ City of Clearwater Post office Box 4748 Clearwater, FL Re: Condit~onal Use Request of Henry & Mary Ann Boerner to permi~ a veterinary office out patient care at 510 South Highland Avenue Cu 99-10 Planner Dear Ms McCall: P~ea8e be advlsed that my cllents have decided to withdraw tte appllcation for condit~onal use. Thank you for you~ aSslstance In this matter. Vpry t-.r\lly YOllr~1 7 ~o~/~~A/></J~ 9 \999 NNING & OE\JELOPMEN1 p\..A SER\J1CES crT'( OF CLEARWATER (!Uqr-/o MEMORANDUM TO Planmng and Zorung Board FROM Smta McCall, Seruor Planner Antorua Gerh, Planmng Manager A7 February 12, 1999 THROUGH DATE SUBJECT CondIuonaI Use Request of Flonda Pet Care, Inc, as a vetennary office out patIent care faclhty MEETING DATE: March 02, 1999 PLANNER: Slllta McCall, Seruer Planner 1. BACKGROUND INFORMATION 1.1. APPLICANT Hemy and Mary Ann Boerner 90 Second Street Mmeola, NY 11501 1.2 PROPOSED USE Vetennary office ~ out patIent care faclhty 1.3 PROPERTY ADDRESS 510 S Hlghland Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 1.4. REPRESENTATIVE H Wilham Van Wagenen 147 N Belcher Road, SUIte 1 Largo, FL 33771 1.5. EXISTING USE Office buddmg conslstmg of a real estate company, a sign and pnntmg company. and a promotional company The size of the office bUlldmg IS approximately 1,700 square feet The office bUlldmg was converted from a smgle family residence 1 1.6. LAND AREA AND DIMENSIONS The land area IS 0 174 acre or 7,560 measun ng 120 84 feet I n WIdth and 62 85 feet In depth 1.7. DATA REVIEWED . Survey Drawing prepared by MIchael Baker Associates, Inc dated September 23, 1996 1.8. PROPERTY LOCATION Southwest comer of South Highland Avenue and Rogers Street, In SectIOn 14, TownshIp 29 S, Range15 E, SUbdivIsion number 10854, Block number 10020, Lot number 1, ClealWater, Pmel1as County, Flonda Zoning Atlas page 297 A 1.9. ZONING DISTRICT . Subject Property . North Side of property . South Side of property . Westslde of property . East SIde of property Limited Office Dlstnct (OL) General CommerCial Dlstnct (CG) Smgle.Famlly Residential Dlstnct B (RS-B) Smgle-Famlly Residential Dlstnct B (RS-B) limited Office Dlstnct (OL) 1.10. FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION . Subject Property Resldentlall Office General (R10G) . North Side of property Commercial General (CG) . South Side of property Residential Urban (RU) . West Side of property Residential Urban (RU) . East Side of property Resldentlall Office General (R10G) 1.11. ADJACENT LAND USES . North Side of property Budget Inn Motel . South Side of property ResIdential . West Side of property Residential . Eastslde of property Residential 2. STAFF ANALYSIS 2.1. STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO ALL CONDITIONAL USES (Section 41.033) 2.1.1. The use compiles with the land use plan. The proposed use IS consistent With the followmg goals and objectives of the ClealWater Comprehensive Plan 2 Goal 2: ClealWater shall focus on renewal of decllmng areas, stabilizatIOn of bUllt.up neighborhoods, and mfill development to encourage economic vltahty and counteract the scarcrty of available vacant land Obiective 2.2 The followmg areas shall be regional actlvrty centers, SUitable for mcreased threshold rntensrty for office development consistent With the boundanes delineated on map 1, Growth centers, and, consistent With the deSignatIOn of Special Transportation Areas on connecting artenal highway links a) Vlcrnlty of S R 60 and U S 19 The proposed project IS located 10 the southwest comer of South Highland Avenue and Rogers Street ThiS area IS 10 the VICInity of S R 60 The land use dlstnct IS limited Office (OL) The proposed locatIOn IS SUitable for Increased threshold mtenslty for office development consistent With the boundanes of vlcrnlty of S R 60 CONCLUSION IN COMPLIANCE 2.1.2. The use compiles With all other appll cable provIsion 5 of the development code {Section 41.033 (2)} Pursuant to SectIOn 40485(2)(h) of the Land Development Code, vetennary offices may be pennrtted as conditional uses wrthm the OL dlstnct The proposed use appears to comply WIth applicable Sections of the land Development Code except as noted 10 thiS report However. other sections of the report will diSCUSS compliance With parkrng, setbacks, nOIse, access and landscaprng whIch are related to the conditIOnal use approval CONCLUSION IN COMPLIANCE 21 3. The use compiles with the applicable conditional use standards for the proposed use contained In division 3 of thiS article {Section 41.033 (3)} : General and Supplementary standards. 2.1.3.1. GENERAL STANDARDS (SECTION 41 052) The standards 10 thiS section shall apply to all uses which are Identified In thiS development code as conditional uses Only those uses which comply With all of the standards contarned 10 thiS section may be approved (1) The use shall comply With the land use plan and all applicable terms contarned 10 thiS development code, the bUIldmg code, and thiS Code of Ordinances As stated above, the proposed use IS consistent With the land use plan ThiS staff report reviews the compliance of the proposal With some sectIons of the land development regulatIOns Compliance With the bUlldmg code IS normally reviewed at a later date 3 CONCLUSION IN COMPLIANCE (2) Acceptable ingress to and egress from the site shall be provided m a manner and location which msure optimum vehicle maneuverability and vehicular and pedestnan safety. The number of ingress and egress drives shall be the minimum necessary to provide reasonable access to the site. The City Traffic Engineer has revIewed the plan and has concluded that the dnveway location on South Highland Avenue results In non-compatIble movements of northbound nght turns Into the slle AdditIOnally, on.slte circulatIOn, If Ingress IS approached from South HIghland Avenue, IS such that the access aisle In front of the bUilding IS Inadequate The eXisting turning radIUS IS 18 feet and 24 feet IS reqUIred RemedYing this sItuation Will requIre major modIfications to the sIte plan and a reduction In the amount of entrance area CONCLUSION NOT IN COMPLIANCE (3) NOise generated from the use shall not unreasonably diminish the use, enjoyment or value of surrounding properties. The applicant has stated that the proposed use IS a vetennary office-out patient facIlity The amount of nOise generated by the sIte depends on the activIty resulting from contalnmg and treating the animals The use will generate nOise - bark.lOg dogs - that could well dIminish the enjoyment of surrounding propertIes The house has not been soundproofed and the barkmg could adversely affect people restmg In the motel or In the surrounding homes Although the office serves as an out patient faCIlIty, there IS also the likelihood that a pet owner will drop off a pet In the morning on the way to wof'l(, and unintentionally forget the pet overnIght ThiS sltuatlon may create nOIse (barkmg) throughout the Olght CONCLUSION NOT IN COMPLIANCE (4) The direction and glare of lights from both motor vehicles and IlIuminatmg fixtures on the site shall not adversely affect the use, enjoyment or value of surrounding properties. Based on the sIte plan, there Will be no glare from the lights of motor vehIcles affecting surrounding properties The applIcant has not submitted mformatlOn regarding whether the Illuminating fixtures would comply WIth thiS sectIon of the Code Approval of the conditional use should not be granted until It IS certain that the proposed vetennary office Will comply WIth thiS standard Therefore, the applIcatIon IS not m compliance WIth thiS standard CONCLUSION NOT IN COMPLIANCE 4 ./ (5) Sufficient landscaping and screening shall be provided to dimmish noise, reduce glare and buffer high activity areas and objectionable Views, including but not limited to trash disposal facIlities, such that the use will not adversely affect the use, enjoyment or value of surrounding properties. It IS likely that the proposed use WIll create nOIse, and the property contains msufficlent landscapmg and screening, especially at the rear of the property, to dlmmlsh the nOise In additIOn, there IS msufficlent buffenng along both South Highland Avenue and Rogers Street The required buffenng IS 5 feet from the property Ime CONCLUSION NOT IN COMPLIANCE (6) Sufficient area shall be afforded for parking in accordance with section 42.34. Pursuant to SectIOn 42 34(2a), the parking requirement IS five spaces per 1000 square feet of gross floor area, or 9 parkmg spaces (1 700/1,000 x 5 space), including 1 handicapped space The application does not Include a parking plan Based on the survey draWing and site VISit, staff has deterrmned that the avaIlable parking on the site IS 4 spaces, mcludlng 1 handicapped space The proposed Site plan contams an mtemal parkmg access aisle parallel to South Highland Avenue that IS insuffiCIent In Width according to the code Currently people park In the front setback The space for backing out of the parkmg space onto the street IS configured madequately The City Engmeer requires that there be 24 feet between the rear of the vehicle and the property hne 10 order to back out of a dnveway onto the street The eXlstmg back out dimenSion IS only 18' The number of parkmg spaces, the back out space and the access aisle are not 10 compliance With the code CONCLUSION NOT IN COMPLIANCE (7) The use shall be consistent with the community character of the property surrounding the use. The criteria In thiS subsection shall be utilized to determine whether the use satisfies this standard: (a) Whether the use is compatible with the surrounding natural environment; There IS one eXisting tree on the property The applIcant does not plan to cut thiS tree and uses It to enhance the value of the property The applicant does not propose any rehabilitation of the extenor space that would harm the Itfe of thiS tree CONCLUSION IN COMPLIANCE 5 (b) Whether the use will have a substantial detrimental effect on the property values of the properties surrounding the conditional use: The uses surrounding the property consist of reSidential, motel and office uses There are only three lots located wrthln the Office LImited zoning dlstnct and they are surrounded by reSidences and the motel The staff IS concerned that nOIse will be generated by the ammals that are unintentionally left overnight or throughout the day and that thIs will create a nUisance The annoYing and disruptive nOise Will have a substantial detnmental effect on the surrounding property values CONCLUSION NOT IN COMPLIANCE (c) Whether the use will be compatible With the surrounding uses as measured by building setbacks, open space, hours of operation, building and site appearance, architectural design and other factors which may be determined appropriate to assess the compatibility of uses; . SETBACKS: The property has an eXisting office building that was converted from a reSidence The reqUired front setbacks are 25 feet on both South Highland Street and on Rogers Street Both setbacks are non- conforming and the applicant IS not proposing to remedy this SituatIOn CONCLUSION NOT IN COMPLIANCE . OPEN SPACE: Pursuant to the Section 40286 (6a), the reqUirement for open space IS 30% The proposed use does not proVide adequate open space The eXisting open space IS only 124% The eXisting site plan for the subject application IS not In compliance With the SectIOn 40 286 (6a) CONCLUSION NOT IN COMPLIANCE . HOURS OF OPERATION: The hours of operation as proposed by the applicant. will be 800 AM to 12 00 Noon and 2 00 PM to 5 00 PM weekdays, and 8 00 AM to 1200 Noon on Saturday These hours of operatIOns are consistent With other commercial uses In the area CONCLUSION IN COMPLIANCE 6 . BUILDING AND SITE APPEARANCE; ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN: The applicant has not submitted elevation drawmgs The subject bUlldmg was onglOally a reSidential bUlldmg, which was converted to office facility Staff has vIsited the Site and has determlOed that basically the bulldmg and srte appearance are similar to the surrounding residential area, however, the facade of the bUlldmg has been renovated for an office bUlldmg This renovation IS consIstent With the office surrounding area CONCLUSION IN COMPLIANCE (d) Whether the traffic generated by the use IS of a type or volume Similar to traffic generated by the surroundmg uses. The traffic generated by the proposed use IS of a type or volume similar to traffic generated by the surroundmg uses CONCLUSION IN COMPLIANCE 2.1.3.2. SUPPLEMENTAL STANDARDS (SECTION 41.053) Pursuant to Section 41.053 (35), veterinary offices may be allowed with the limited office, general office, general commercial, downtown/mixed use, highway commercial, infill commercial, commercial center, neighborhood commercial distncts, subject to all of the following: (a) All activities shall be conducted withm soundproof, air conditioned buildings with no outdoor cages, runs or other outdoor facilities unless detennined by the planmng and zoning board that such facilities are located and screened so as to not adversely affect the use, enjoyment or value of surroundmg properties. The applicant stated that the proposed use IS a vetennary office - out patient facIlity, With no outdoor cages, runs, or other outdoor facllrtles However, as stated m the above analYSIS, there IS a IIkehhood of nOise generated by the ammals left In the bUlldmg overnight by the pet owners or nOise throughout the day Although the eXlstmg wall construction from the ongmal reSidential bUlldmg IS bnck, which may have some potential for soundproofing, barkmg dogs may stili create annoymg nOise The applicant has not stated that the office IS soundproofed CONCLUSION NOT IN COMPLIANCE (b) There shall be no overnight boarding of aOlmals unless detennmed by the planning and zoning board that such boarding facilities are sufficiently soundproofed and air conditioned, and are used only for animals requiring veterinary treatment. The applicant IS not proposing overnight boardmg 7 CONCLUSION IN COMPLIANCE (c) The use shall comply with all of the general standards contained in section 41.052. General Standards contamed In SectIOn 41 052 have all been addressed above 2.1.4. The use shall be consistent with the commumty welfare, and not detract from the public's convemence at the specific location (Section 41.033(4}). The community welfare IS enumerated and mandated In several public documents approved by the Clearwater Crty Commission Foremost of these IS the Comprehensive Plan ThiS report has already stated that the proposal IS inconsistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan The commumty welfare IS also enumerated In the Land Development RegulatIOns Throughout thiS document, It has been stated that the proposal IS not In comphance With speCific sectIOns of the regulatIOns The proposed use of vetennary office IS inconsistent WIth the welfare of the commumty The use will create a pnvate nUisance regardmg nOise due to lack of soundproofing and suffiCient buffenng In adjacent to residential and motel uses The lack of a suffiCient number of parking spaces WIll detract from the public's convenience at the surrounding area In addition, the proposed development has been deemed by 1he City traffic engineer to have a means of mgress and egress that IS insuffiCient Therefore, the proposed project IS inconsistent With the commumty welfare as enumerated In the ComprehenSive Plan and the Land Development Regulations, and Will detract from the convenience of the public CONCLUSION NOT IN COMPLIANCE 21 5. The use shall not unduly decrease the value of neighboring properties. Section 41.033 (5) The proposed use Will adversely affect the property values In the area As mentioned above, there IS a likelihood that pet owners Will unmtentlonally leave their pets overmght In the proposed use or that the animals WIll bark dunng the day and the bUilding IS not soundproofed ThiS inCIdent Will create noise and disturb the reSIdential bulldmg on the west Side and the south Side of the propose use, and the Budget Inn Motel on the north Side of the proposed use As a result It Will reduce the value of surroundmg property CONCLUSION NOT IN COMPLIANCE 8 2.1.6. The use shall be compatible with the surrounding area and not impose an excessive burden or have a substantial negative Impact on surrounding or adjacent uses or on community facilities or services (Section 41.033 (6) As stated In the paragraph 2 1 5 above, the proposed use IS not compatible with the surroundlOg area The proposed used Will Impose an excessive burden or have a substantial negallve Impact on surrounding or adjacent uses on commumty facIlities CONCLUSION NOT IN COMPLIANCE 3, FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS 3 1 Based on the site plan, the dnveway location on South Highland Avenue results In non- compatible movements of northbound nght turns Into the Site The mgress and egress on South Highland Avenue IS unsafe due to the high volume of traffic (18,000 vpd) Addlllonally, on-site CIrculation, If mgress IS approached from South Highland Avenue, IS such that the access aisle In front of the bUilding IS Inadequate The eXlstmg tummg radiUS IS 18 feet, where the reqUirement IS 24 feet Therefore, the proposed development IS not In compliance With Section 41 052(2) ofthe land Development Code 32 Based on the applicatIOn, It IS IIk,ely that the proposed Will create nOIse and disturb the reSidents on the west and south Sides of the propose use and the guests at the Budget Inn Motel on the north Side of the proposed use Therefore, the proposed development IS not In compliance With Section 41 052(3), 41 052(7)(b), 41 033(6), 41 033 (4), and 41 033 (5) of the land Development Code 33 Based on the site plan, the proposed use proVides insuffiCient landscaping and screemng, especially at the rear of the proposed property There IS insuffiCient buffenng along both South HIghland Avenue and Rogers Street Therefore, the proposed development IS not In compliance With SectIOn 41 052(5) of the land Development Code 34 Based on the site plan and a site VISit, the number of parking spaces (four spaces), IS not In compliance With the parkmg regulations which would require nme spaces Includmg handicapped Therefore, the proposed parkmg of the proposed use IS not compliance With Section 41 34 (6)(2a) of the land Development Code 35 Based on the site plan, the apphcant IS proposmg only 124% open space where the reqUired open space IS 30% Therefore, the proposed project IS not rn comphance With Section 40 286 (6a) and 41 052 erc) 3 6 Based on staffs conversation With the representative, the eXlstmg wall construction from the ongmal reSidential bUilding ]s bnck and IS not soundproofed Thus, there IS the likelihood that nOIse generated by the animals may adversely affect the property values In the area Therefore, the proposed project IS not In compliance With Section 401053 (35)(a) of the land Development Code 9 4, STAFF RECOMMENDATION Based on the findings and conclusIOns, staff recommends DENIAL of the request of the Flonda Pet Care, Inc to conduct 1 700 square feet of vetennary office - outpatient care facility at 510 South Highland Avenue SMcCall C \SHARE\CDB\ 1999\CU99-1 0 Boerner I 10 "1Hj;'-01-' ~g THl, 14:;:5 ] D BllYTO-I PFO=>E~T)::S TEL HO IEl% P0L ._ = [ Ct/f ~~ LtJ ERA BUXTON PROPERTIES, INC. COMMERCIAL INVESTMENT DIVISION fACSIMILE TR.ANSMITTAL SHEET TO S:v:A ,/11e- {!.df OOMPANY ~ FA~&:/ S~ ql - YJ-?(.? PHONE "''UMB~1l. .5, J1. - l(ff 7 JIJ! 5/CJ s..lI~ FROM, H. W,Ulam Van Wagenen Vice President - Broker DATfi. 3 J Iff TOTAL NO. OtjAGES lNCLl.1DfNG CO/Ell SENDER'S REI'ERL"'ICE "<UMBeR y01.Jll, 1l.f1~El'-'CE "'UMBER rlJ1l.GENT D pOR. R.!VIEW [J PLEASE COMMENT 0 PLUSE un y 0 PlEASB RECYCLE NOTES/COMMENTS 7~ ~.4-- J ~ ~. ~~ '..r. A..ah~ ~ ~ ~~ 06~~~~ ~~JL ~~ O~ oLANNING & OEVELOPMENi r SERVICES OF CLEARWATER erN 147 N. BELCHER ROAD LARGO. FLORI DA 33771 PHONE. (727) 538-0034 FAX (727) 531-1490 ~AP-Ol-'S9 THU 14 26 ID BL~TON P~O~EPT!ES 02/27/99 04.21 FAX ;;='95 P02 TEL NO JOR~ MORGAN BauNSoN ArN""" AJl'p C:Ollll.!lZIDB IJ L6,w \.,.. ,J OJltlrAJ' B !i.U. C 0C'lIT CLL6-RWAJ:B.B. fLOal1)A 33'7ee 1~~rJlolll1l t'ri-7) -'I' - ;nae T~1..IICOYI8. 0'8'" 466-6l'QlO FeQ~Uary 26, 1999 Siota McCall, Senior Planner planning add Zoning SODrd Re: condielonal UB. aequeu~ of Henry & Mary Ann Boerner to permi~ G veterinary off~ce OU~ pa~ient care at 510 South Hlghland Avenue ell 99-10 De6r Ladies and Gentlemenl Please be advl&ed that I repreeent the Boerner. 1.n thia application. The purpose of this letter i.. to reF;J.pond to the memQrandum prepared by Staff with respeQt to the application of Henry anei Mary Ann Boerner. Oft behalf of the Boernere and the veteriner~.n, Dr. Michael Adams, who nas contracted to purchase the propertl I would like to address some of the conosrns outlined .n ~Ae St. f Report. The curr.nt property wel O~ig~D.Lly a residential &ite. HowBver, when Highland Avenue WBS widened oRd became a general commercial ~horouqhfare the lot area was ~ea~ly r~duced and Que to the increal' 1D traffic vol~e and pro~ty it was no lonqer a viable reai4ential property. The main p~oblem with the sitQ 11 that it ie severely limited under the Code because of its small area, which iB due to the feet that the road right-of-way .lim1na~ed a large portion of the original lot'S area. what Dr. Adam. propoeeB is an extremely limited use operation. It would include out-patient by appoin~JtIent only visit! to the veter1nar~an. This ie ~~e doetor's praQtice and hae been for the laB~ 15 years, nr. Ad~s would gua&a~t.. (Bnd the current owner commitG as a commiement if the concti~ional use requ.st ~s grantud) that there woul~ Qe nO more than four cars parkeQ on the property at any ooe time. Dr. Adams I special practiee is perfectly 8ui.t.d to such a a=ell requirement for park~ng spaces. He see. p~tien~. by appoint.Sllent. o~ly. patie:l1t... are pickea Up' by ..ppointmeJ\~ only. The current a.. has several offices which are fully used by oc~upant.8 and ~u.tomerQ that visit the~. Th~8 mean~ 100\ of tbe space ia uaad in a maftner which qenerat$& traffic, your offices means four occupantsj four secretaries, eight custoMers 1 the potential for !6 parkiDg _paces used. 7 o ~~~~~~ , - i i IO"'.JQ I" ... ..""...~1I..~ PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF CLEARWATER ~02 Jlall <. II. - ... - mn 0-0 -"D fD'C --, 0\, \ : I i "\I ~AP-01-'99 TH~ 14 2? I: BUXTON PRO~ERT'~S 02/27,99 04 21 FA\ IE<lgc P2l3 TEL ~O S1nta MQC.ll, Senior Planner Planning and Zoning Board February 26, 1999 P&;8 2 The veterinarian use would eliminate most of that u8. a~d. replace it with an examination area, a.n operl'lting area and a recovery area, Most of the use of the building ahall be a non- traffic glnerating use; on. doc:t.cr, one secretary anei two Qustomere equals four parking spaces. ThiB use would probably reduce current traffic qenerat10n by 75'. We believe that thie ccndi'tional use requellt 11 greatly super~or to the cu~rent use or moat other uses tbat are already allowed on the Bite, Que to tbe limited ~ount Of parking fteeded at any given. tUDe, As you oan see from 'the encloeed. llltterE. of endor.ement, ~he oeiqhborB agree with thil a. well. { pue eo the limited parking on tbe e~te, the current tenantB f c-,/'('.3'UCL/ 81'. not in a pocition to Ilupport an excellently maiDtalnel.'t , J' ~I'{ h~ildinq, whereas the use by 'Or, Adams would bring a majo.r j 11.1 [.'L'([ n. .improvement. in the appearance Of tbQ1 b\l11dinQ' that would be a lonq , ! l1:icr.cfC lasting benefit to. -the City of CleArwater in general and to the ,-' 'I ( , ' Bur-rounding neighbors and neJ.qhborhood in pArticular. The owner a~d the buyer of the p~operey are both in agreement with ~he followi49 eOQd~tiQns limiting the use of the property or mcdifyift; tbe condition of the property and hereby submit them 88 agreed upon eondition$ to any conditional approval. W~th respect to s tanl1ard 2, 1 . 3 . (2) the c:cnc:erne po 1 n'ted ou.t by the City'S traffic engineer hol~ true for the current use as well as the veter1nGrian use. However, tne owner and tbe veterinarian hereby aqree as a condition to limit total ,parking use to four spaces to be rigidly cOI:trolled by Dr. Adams' appointment ached.ule, Thie ha~ beAd a praotice of Or. 1damB for the last 15 years a~ another location 1n the City of Clearwater and shall be maintain~d via a rigid appolntment book schedule, This reduc't1on iu traffic over the eurre~t use, ie. several office establishments, w~ll be a siqnlf1cant improvement over the current s1tuation if the conditional use ic granted. , ~ ,-e - Y'r'tJ l ' "dE I "-J f J'-f, '1:::> ( t. ...I~ I ,\,! )1t.. ~ .J'( ( (,I' . lilIo~ )tCD :: -. ... - Alt) 0-0 -" ",< 2 . 1 . 3 . (3 ) The applicant and Dr. Aetams agree t1lat Or. Adams as a condi~lon of the une shall totally soundproof the facility to any ClPprQpr1at.e Col1c standard. includ1nq B. standard 'that any uCle gBneratinQ noise ie, barking dogs, etc. shall not be detectible to ally neighbors. 2.1.3, (..) The applic4J3t and Or. AdaJus agree that al a C!~nlSition ll.e will not. prov.lde any 11lumJ.natinq fixturea at all unl,c8 the fixtures comply with th18 8ect.lOn of the Code and are approv.~ ~n advance by the City of Clearwater Sta o ~(C[E~~[E D - \ I 199~ 0\ PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF CLEARWATER "1f;R-01 ~ '59 THI-, 14 28 I D BUXTON PROPEPT I :::S 02/27/99 04:21 F~\ TEL '10 sinta Mccall, Sen~or Planne. Planninq and zoning loard U.brua~ 26~ 1999 page 3: ~:3'36 P04 :aJ 04 2.1.3.(!;) Ayaloj tha applicant and buye~ cOJllDlit that a condition of the condition.al U~. approval shall be tha.t the property will be soundproofed and further the appl~cQnt commits that 8dd~~ional landscaping to be approved by the cley of Clearwater Staff will be planted at the rear of the puilding in order to impro~' the land.caping requirements. 2.1.3.(6) Again, the applicant ona ~be buyer as a co~dit1on of ehe approval of the cond1tlonal use commit to the use of no mO~8 t~an four parkin~ .paces on the site to be e~ring8ntly complied wita baaed on the veterinarian's appointment ichedule, Aqain, I would noee that Dr, Adams has been follo~~ng ~his exact proced~re for over lS yeariil i~ i:.hB local C01\U'G.UI1.1.ty. While there 1.8 no question that ~his sloee, due to the w1d.eninq of Iligblcm" Avenue bae Bavere parking spac. lim1~atio~, the requeeted use aB l~lted .ill greatly imp~eve the 8~1.tinq condit.ona and provide a benefit to the cammuDity ~f reduclnq the number of spaces and total traffic generated .~ th1.S particular location. 2.1,],(7) AQa1.n, the appl1.cant and the buyer co~dltion the use upou complete eoundproofiz:l.O of th6 build.ing Wh1.l;h should eliminate Staff COQ~.rn ~e9ard~ng ~he property valuat~onB. 2.1.3,(')(C) Aga!n, Que to the taki~9 of the Highland Avenue property it ie impoaai~le to comply with the Get back requirements. However~ the propo.ed limited uie is a great lmprovement over the Bxisting use. Resardiug open gpace, in the ev.nt ~he limited use le app~oved and limited by the conditlQn. conf~rmed by this l.tte~. the lUlited num):)er: o~ parking spaces will allow some minor addltional open space. Again, due to the expansi~n of H~9bland Aven~e it would appear to be impo8sible to generat~ the ent1.re 30\ of opoD. space. w1tb respect to 2.1,3.2. Supplemental standarde Section 41.053(35)(a), the applicant and the buyer both 6tate a. a condition to approval that tbe building shall be totally 80Ul1dproofed.. 2.1.4. Section 41.033 (4) Given tbe addlticnal conditl.oQI agTee~ to by the appl1can~ and the buyer purs~.nt to this letter, th_ coneer~ reqard1ng & private uu~sance vill he resolved wi~h the eoundproofiu; of the building. The l.mited uGe restriction that D~, AOwma and the applicant have agreed to will l~it ~he actual ame~D~ ot p8rk~uo epacee used which equate. to an improvemene in the ae~ual traffic and use of parking epacee. )1.11 <fD Attn -. ~ -~ Ate') 0'0 -tI fD'C ) '1"""",,\ -,-I j ~"j:: PLANNINd'1 DrVEr SERVICES CllY OF CLEARWATER 'lHP-01-' 99 THU 14 ~9 I r BUXTO~l Pf':ooERT I ~S 02(%7'99 O~ 21 FAX TEL NO l'I::I'::Ib t"'a:> 141 OS S~~ea McCall, Se~ior Planner ~1.nnin9 and 2oniog Bo&rd February 26, 1i99 Page 4 2.1.5. Section 41.033(5) Again, the applioant and buyer sr- condit1.oning the cond.1't1.onal use upon soundproofing the property liO the concluglon that this w111 d~a~urb the ne1.qhbor8 11 no longer approp~iate. Indeed, ae evidenced by the supporting letters, ~h8 surrounding reeide~t6 are in favor of the conditional use. 2.1.6. Sect~on 41.033(6) Given ~he comw~tment6 in thie letter 81 conditions to the approved uae, we believe this shall make the proposed use compa.tible with the currouDd~ng area. Again, we enelQle c:opiell of dlie 1.~~.rB from neighbors evidencing th.ir aqr..ment with this. In cODclus~on, we appreciate the unique proble~6 tbat tbia Sl~6 pre.ent8 for the only uses available once the cha.ac~e. snd ~i2e of the site eo dramatically chanoed. by tbe expliln;lon of H1Q'hland Avenue. We believe that the pt'a~ased eonditl.ocal UBe with l~ted park1nq use .nd Goun~prooflDi of the build~~g will be a lIiqnificant improvement to the current allowable uees on tha Bite by l~it~ng tra%Ei~ to the aite, providin~ a profo.gional office with an e&celle~t level of maintenance to the building and lot that a profe~c1.onal veterinarian'. offl.ce 'lll'i.ll provide and we would ~eatly appr.ciate your approv&l of the condi~~on81 use request. We would P8 happy to anSwer any quAstiOQS or cod1fy any of thB~8 commitments further if requ8Kt.d or required by the Board, Please ad~i.e if you have ~ny question. or comments. Very truly your'r i!:MO~~ ~: AlU> iii.,*, - Atn erO -" fDfr( The term. and conQl~1ons of thie letter are herebY ack ~ledqed~ H. ~ (C [E,r Ii \ 1'7 I' -\;:..-=.-- ~ : - , \, - -- '----1 v' - , , L.., : I!..,' '- ! " I U --- I j t II \ !: II I t I r ~ , f I I "-<,, ( , v,"=" 1- _ "'fjrl:~ PLANNING & DEVELOPMENi SERVICES CITY OF CLEARVVATER ~AP-81-'9~ THU 14 30 ]D BUXTON PRO~ERT'=S TEL NO 1:13% pa6 Re 510 South Highland Ave CU 99.10 )ttm <CD At. -- fill - Atn erO --a CD,< City of Clearwater P. O. Box 4748 Clearwater. FI337-4748 Dear Sirs: The undersigned owns property contiguous to the above referenced property. It Is my understanding that the current owners have applied for a conditional use of the property as a veterinary office providing for outpabent care by appointment only It has been represented to me that the proposed operation will not be condUCive to barking dogs causing B nuisance to the adjoining property. It 18 also my understanding that the bUilding will be remodeled and upgraded. Based on the foregoing. I have no objection to the proposed use of the property Very truly yours, ~~I-~ Address: I '4 "1 L\ r? '5-( rs :s+ ct~&'w3kr, PI..- ~?'~ ':1.1 "', /' '( PLANNING & DEVELOPM SERVICES ENT CITY OF ClEAfM?:rrE'R ~1A~-2: - '99 THU 14 31 ID: BUXTON PRO='ERTl ES TEL NO, tl996 ='07 Re: 510 South Highland Ave. CU 99-10 ~f DIU) .. ,.. - I>>n cro --0 -'C City of Clearwater P. O. Box 4748 Clearwater. FI337-4748 Dear Sirs The undersigned owns property conllguous to the above referenced property, It Is my understanding that the current owners have applied for 8 conditional U8e of the property a8 a vetennary office proViding for outpatient care by apPointment only. It has been represented to me that the proposed operation will not be conducive to bariting dogs causing 8 nUisance to the adjoining property, It IS also my understanding that the bUilding will be remodeled and upgraded Based on the foregoing, I have no objection to the proposed use of the property, Very truly yours. Sv06Er ..I.(.IN /f)arEt- ~~ Owner ~/.;u;.IPf Adoress: (4.1 ( CdVtt-T.5 T, CLJ,;AI{ a.,l?EA. O ~ 0 f~ n \\~ I ~ ~:-::,,-~ ~~U~li"-)'J ' - , , ~ t t i J I I i ) I I II - .n.......,. t! J · ........ ............... f I ~ U,' !~_" ~~~/ I PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT ! SERVICES-"" . --- CITY OF CLEARWATER ,! ~