The URL can be used to link to this page

20-37 (2)RESOLUTION NO. 20-37 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA APPROVING THE FT. HARRISON AVENUE COMPLETE STREETS STUDY FINAL REPORT, A COMPLETE STREETS CONCEPT PLAN FOR FT. HARRISON AVENUE, FROM BELLEAIR ROAD TO N. MYRTLE AVENUE; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Clearwater Comprehensive Plan's Future Land Use Element and Transportation Element recognize the importance of providing multimodal mobility options for people of all ages and abilities; and WHEREAS, the City of Clearwater Comprehensive Plan's Future Land Use Element and Transportation Element includes a Citywide Design Structure which identifies portions of Ft. Harrison Avenue between Belleair Road and Druid Road and between Seminole Street and Sunset Point Road as a Redevelopment Corridor that needs character changes or restoration that support creating "walkable communities" and livable neighborhoods", identifies Fort Harrison Avenue as a Primary Scenic Corridor that has particular significance in terms of tourism, economic development, or community character, and designates South Fort Harrison as a gateway to the City; and WHEREAS, Complete Streets are designed, operated, and maintained for all users, regardless of age or ability, and are essential in providing safe routes to schools for children; and WHEREAS, the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan's Accessibility Goal and Objectives call for the strengthening of Ft. Harrison Avenue as a local, pedestrian oriented street, and seeks to reduce pedestrian and vehicle conflicts; and WHEREAS, the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan Implementation, as adopted by the Community Redevelopment Agency August 2, 2018, established a capital improvement project for the redesign and construction of Ft. Harrison Avenue as a Complete Street, to achieve the Plan's accessibility goal; and WHEREAS, Ft. Harrison Avenue is a south -north roadway operated by the City that connects two Activity Centers designated in the City of Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Citywide Design Structure, the Morton Plant Hospital Campus and Downtown, with multiple designated Destination Points, including the City/County Government Complex, the Clearwater Marina, PSTA's Park Street Terminal, the Main Library, and the Seminole Boat Launch; and WHEREAS, the Ft. Harrison Avenue corridor provides opportunities to address equity and environmental justice concerns for the transportation disadvantaged 1 Resolution No. 20-37 communities of Lake Belleview and North Greenwood through improved access to work, live, shop, and play; and WHEREAS, on December 6, 2018, the City Council of the City of Clearwater authorized staff to apply for Program funding for Complete Streets concept planning for Ft. Harrison Avenue (hereinafter referred to as "Project"), for which the City was awarded $50,000 on March 13, 2019, and the City Council authorized an agreement between the City and Forward Pinellas and the Scope of Work for the Project on June 20, 2019 (Resolution 19-09); and WHEREAS, the City Council contracted with HDR Engineering, Inc. to develop the Ft. Harrison Avenue Complete Street Concept Plan and implement a community outreach program for the Project; and WHEREAS, Project development included data collection, analysis, coordination with a Project Visioning Team comprised of local business owners, residents, and city staff, as well as representatives from institutions and local agencies, and public outreach through a public online survey and an outreach event at Blast Friday; and WHEREAS, recent planning studies and design concepts were directly incorporated into the Project, including the Alternate US 19 and Fairmont Street Roundabout Design (FDOT — May 2019), the Complete Drew Street Project (City of Clearwater — October 2019), and the North Marina Area Master Plan (City — January 2016); and WHEREAS, the Project divided the corridor into three main segments based on character and context, and recommendations and design strategies are tailored for each segment to provide several key benefits including improving transportation accessibility, corridor aesthetics, safety and livability while supporting local businesses; and WHEREAS, recommended improvements are also consistent with the guiding principles established in the Clearwater Complete Streets Implementation Plan, approved by City Council June 20, 2019; and WHEREAS, the final recommendations are based on the input received from the public and Project Visioning Team members, and each selected design strategy provides its own unique benefits to enhancing the street, but collectively serve to further the key goals developed for the corridor; and WHEREAS, design concepts and strategies for each segment are incorporated into the Final Report, which is attached to this Resolution as Exhibit A; now, therefore BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: 2 Resolution No. 20-37 Section 1. Approves the Final Report, as attached in Exhibit "A," accepts the HDR Engineering, Inc., Complete Streets Concept Designs for the Ft. Harrison Avenue Complete Streets Study, and authorizes the appropriate City officials to take all necessary action as may be necessary or appropriate to transmit to Forward Pinellas and other jurisdictions the Final Report. Section 2. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED this -3 day of bt --i4 , 2020. rank V. Hibbard Mayor Approved as to form: Attest: Michael P. Fuino Assistant City Attorney 3 Rosemarie Call City Clerk Resolution No. 20-37 EXHIBITA FT. HARRISON AVENUE COMPLETE STREETS STUDY FINAL REPORT November 2020 4 Resolution No. 20-37  NOVEMBER 2020 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS .................................................................................................................................................... 1 LIST OF FIGURES .............................................................................................................................................................. 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................................. 3 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................................... 4 PROJECT OVERVIEW .................................................................................................................................................. 4 STUDY PURPOSE ......................................................................................................................................................... 4 PREVIOUS STUDIES .................................................................................................................................................... 4 CORRIDOR CHARACTERISTICS .............................................................................................................................. 6 SEGMENT 1A: City Gateway .................................................................................................................................... 9 SEGMENT 1B: Downtown Transition ................................................................................................................... 9 SEGMENT 2: Downtown Core ............................................................................................................................. 10 SEGMENT 3: Old Bay/North Marina ................................................................................................................. 11 PUBLIC OUTREACH SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................... 12 PROJECT VISIONING TEAM ................................................................................................................................. 12 PUBLIC OUTREACH EVENT................................................................................................................................... 13 PUBLIC SURVEY ........................................................................................................................................................ 14 EVALUATING POTENTIAL IMPROVEMENTS ........................................................................................................ 16 DEMONSTRATION VS. PERMANENT PROJECTS .......................................................................................... 16 OTHER COMPLETE STREETS FEATURES .......................................................................................................... 16 DESIGN STRATEGIES ............................................................................................................................................... 17 RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................................................................................. 19 PROJECT CONCEPTS OVERVIEW ....................................................................................................................... 19 SEGMENT 1A: City Gateway ................................................................................................................................. 19 Summary of Traffic Analysis for Road Diet ................................................................................................ 22 SEGMENT 1B: Downtown Transition ................................................................................................................ 23 SEGMENT 2: Downtown Core ............................................................................................................................. 25 SEGMENT 3: Old Bay/North Marina ................................................................................................................. 29 PLANNING LEVEL OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS .................................................................................... 30 APPENDIX A: PROJECT VISIONING TEAM #1 MEETING ................................................................................. 33 APPENDIX B: PROJECT VISIONING TEAM #2 MEETING ................................................................................. 79 APPENDIX C: TRAFFIC MEMORANDUM ............................................................................................................ 132 APPENDIX D: CONCEPT PLAN BELLEAIR ROAD TO LAKEVIEW ROAD .................................................. 179 2 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Study Area Map ............................................................................................................................................ 4 Figure 2: Project Goals .................................................................................................................................................. 4 Figure 3: Roundabout Concept at Fairmont Street and Alt. US 19 (from FDOT) .................................... 5 Figure 4: North Marina Area Master Plan Exhibit ............................................................................................... 6 Figure 5: Study Area Transit ........................................................................................................................................ 7 Figure 6: Study Area Statistics Compared to City and County ...................................................................... 8 Figure 7: Corridor Segments ....................................................................................................................................... 8 Figure 8: Segment 1A Map .......................................................................................................................................... 9 Figure 9: Segment 1B Map ....................................................................................................................................... 10 Figure 10: Segment 2 Map ....................................................................................................................................... 11 Figure 11: Segment 3 Map ....................................................................................................................................... 11 Figure 12: Project Visioning Team Walkshop Photos ..................................................................................... 12 Figure 13: Blast Friday Word Cloud and Information Booth ....................................................................... 13 Figure 14: MetroQuest Survey ................................................................................................................................ 14 Figure 15: Survey Responses Mode of Travel .................................................................................................... 14 Figure 16: MetroQuest Survey Responses (Sample) ....................................................................................... 15 Figure 17: Example of Demonstration vs. Permanent Installation Projects ........................................... 16 Figure 18: Cumulative Benefits of the Design Strategies .............................................................................. 19 Figure 19 Segment 1A Proposed Improvements ............................................................................................. 20 Figure 20: Segment 1A Existing and Proposed Typical Sections ............................................................... 21 Figure 21: Road Diet Concept Plan Belleair Road to Belleview Boulevard ............................................. 21 Figure 22 Road Diet Concept Plan Belleview Boulevard Intersection ...................................................... 22 Figure 23 Segment 1B Proposed Improvements ............................................................................................. 23 Figure 24: Segment 1B Existing and Proposed Typical Sections ................................................................ 24 Figure 25: Concept Plan from Belleview Boulevard to north of Lakeview Road .................................. 24 Figure 26 Concept Plan Reconfigured Lakeview Road Intersection ......................................................... 25 Figure 27 Segment 2 Proposed Improvements ................................................................................................ 26 Figure 28: Existing and Proposed Typical Section North of Cleveland Street ....................................... 26 Figure 29: Concept Plan Removing Northbound Left Turn Lane at Pierce Street ............................... 27 Figure 30: Photo of Delivery Truck in Center Turn Lane and Drop-off Zone within Sidewalk ........ 28 Figure 31: Renderings of Concept Removing Left Turn Lane in Front of Ft. Harrison Hotel (from Church of Scientology) ............................................................................................................................................... 28 Figure 32 Segment 3 Proposed Improvements ................................................................................................ 29 Figure 33: Segment 3 Existing and Proposed Typical Sections .................................................................. 30 Figure 34: Planning Level Opinion of Probable Costs .................................................................................... 31 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Ft. Harrison Avenue Complete Streets Study recommends improvements for Ft. Harrison Avenue from Belleair Road to N. Myrtle Avenue within the City of Clearwater to provide mobility, safety, and placemaking along the 3.2-mile study corridor. Certain recent planning studies and design concepts were directly incorporated into this study including the Alternate US 19 and Fairmont Street Roundabout Design (FDOT – May 2019), the Complete Drew Street Project (City of Clearwater – October 2019), and the North Marina Area Master Plan (City – January 2016). Recommended improvements are also consistent with the guiding principles established in the Clearwater Complete Streets Implementation Plan. A menu of design strategies was considered when developing recommendations to provide mobility, safety, and placemaking along the study corridor. A Project Visioning Team (PVT) was formed to guide the initiative, including local business owners, residents, and city staff, as well as representatives from institutions and local agencies. To experience Ft. Harrison Avenue outside of a car, the PVT traveled to various locations along the corridor on the Clearwater Jolley Trolley as part of a “Walkshop”, and later discussed existing conditions, design strategies, and alternatives with the project team. Almost 650 postcards were mailed to residents and businesses within the study area to promote participation in an online survey and to encourage people to visit the project team at the February Blast Friday event in Downtown Clearwater. An estimated 300 individuals were reached, and attendees were provided with a pamphlet with further information and a link to a public survey about the project. The final recommendations are based on the input received from the public and Project Visioning Team members. Each selected design strategy provides its own unique benefits to enhancing the street, but collectively the strategies serve to further the key goals developed for the corridor, consistent with the guiding principles established in the Clearwater Complete Streets Implementation Plan and illustrated in Figure 2. Proposed concepts primarily work within existing rights-of-way and do not require moving curbs or storm drains. A traffic study was completed for the southern segment (Segment 1A) to evaluate a proposed road diet, the results of which showed that peak-hour delays would increase by less than seven seconds on average at the controlling intersection of Ft. Harrison Avenue and Belleview Boulevard. A planning level opinion of probable costs was developed for the permanent installation of each of the proposed improvement concepts proposed in this study to aid in advancing the improvements identified in this study to the next phase. 4 INTRODUCTION PROJECT OVERVIEW The Ft. Harrison Avenue Complete Streets Study identified potential improvements for Ft. Harrison Avenue from Belleair Road to N. Myrtle Avenue within the City of Clearwater. The study limits measure approximately 3.2 miles. Figure 1: Study Area Map STUDY PURPOSE The goal of the study was to recommend improvements to provide mobility, safety, and placemaking along the study corridor. This project identified improvements to address the corridor deficiencies which would address the short and long-term needs of all users of the corridor. Improvements implement the guiding principles established in the Clearwater Complete Streets Implementation Plan. Figure 2: Project Goals PREVIOUS STUDIES Several recent studies were completed by the City and FDOT which are referenced throughout this study. The studies included: • Alternate US 19 and Fairmont Street Roundabout Design (FDOT – May 2019) – FDOT conducted a corridor planning study along Alternate US 19 (Alt. US 19) to develop a long- 5 term vision for the corridor and identify multimodal solutions to address the mobility needs within a context that reflects the corridor vision. The study proposed a roundabout at the Fairmont Street intersection to improve traffic operations at the northern end of Ft. Harrison Avenue near Alt. US 19, which serves as an alternative north-south corridor to Ft. Harrison Avenue. The proposed roundabout at Alt. US 19 and Fairmont Street is anticipated to relieve traffic congestion for vehicles going from northbound Ft. Harrison Avenue onto northbound Alt. US 19. Figure 3: Roundabout Concept at Fairmont Street and Alt. US 19 (from FDOT) • Complete Drew Street (City – September 2018) – This project’s goals included improving safety, accessibility, and connectivity with land uses, supporting existing businesses and future growth, and promoting active living with improved access to trails. The Complete Drew Street Project recommended a road diet from four to two lanes with on-street parking and improved infrastructure for people cycling and walking in the segment of Drew Street between Osceola and Myrtle Avenues, which crosses Ft. Harrison Avenue. • North Marina Area Master Plan (City – January 2016) – This plan includes concepts for redevelopment for the area around Ft. Harrison Avenue and Seminole Street. The plan calls for wider sidewalks, activated corners, enhanced pedestrian zones, and avoidance of driveway conflicts. Future development envisions single-story retail and mid-rise residential. This area acts as a gateway into Downtown and the Seminole Street Boat Launch. Since plan adoption, this area has been integrated into the city’s Downtown 6 Redevelopment Plan area and the Downtown District & Development Standards were adopted which implement the vision. Figure 4: North Marina Area Master Plan Exhibit Improvements in this study of Ft. Harrison Avenue are consistent with the goals and recommendations of the previous relevant studies along and adjacent to the corridor. No additional analysis was completed for the FDOT roundabout at Fairmont Street. CORRIDOR CHARACTERISTICS The corridor was divided into three main segments based on character, context, land use, existing typical sections, and available right-of-way, which are further described below. Existing conditions and constraints were examined in the field and using demographic data. Ft. Harrison Avenue provides connections to key destinations within the city, including Clearwater Beach, Seminole Street Boat Launch, Park Street Transit Center, Morton Plant Hospital, the County Courthouse, Clearwater Main Library, and Coachman Park. Area transit includes four distinct services shown in Figure 5 and listed below. Users of these services are oftentimes pedestrians before and after their transit trips. This increases the importance of ensuring non-vehicular user safety and connectedness along the corridor. 7 Figure 5: Study Area Transit • Bus Route 52/52LX (Downtown Clearwater to Downtown St. Petersburg) – Express service during peak hours, with thirty-minute headways Monday through Saturday and one-hour headways Sundays and holidays. • Bus Route 66L (Tarpon Springs to Park Street Terminal) – Limited stop route with 90-minute headways during peak hours Monday through Friday, and no service on Saturdays, Sundays, or holidays. • SunCoast and Jolley Trolley (Downtown Clearwater to Clearwater Beach) – Daily service with 30-minute headways, including on holidays, and extended service on weekends. • Clearwater Ferry (Downtown Clearwater to Clearwater Beach) – Reservations required, service generally with one-hour headways Thursday through Sunday. The project team reviewed key area statistics in comparison with the county and city. Of note, the corridor area’s median household income is $24k (compared to $47k for Pinellas County and $45k for the City of Clearwater). Similarly, 24% of the population in the corridor area is below the poverty level (compared to 14% for Pinellas County and 16% for the City of Clearwater). Finally, the percentage of the households with no vehicles is 22% in the study area (compared to 9% for Pinellas County and 12% for the City of Clearwater). 8 Figure 6: Study Area Statistics Compared to City and County Ft. Harrison Avenue is consistently two lanes with a continuous center two-way left turn lane (TWLTL), with the exception of a portion of Segment 1 that is four lanes and merges into a three-lane section. Due to the different cross sections and knowing that recommended treatments may vary given the nature of the existing characteristics of each segment, the project team decided to divide Segment 1 into two sub-segments: Segment 1A and Segment 1B. Descriptions of each segment can be found on the following pages. Figure 7: Corridor Segments 9 SEGMENT 1A: City Gateway Segment 1A extends from the southern end of the study area at Belleair Road to Belleview Boulevard. The right-of-way is typically 100-foot wide and the posted speed limit is 30 MPH. This segment is currently a four-lane section. However, the two northbound lanes merge to one lane approximately 500 feet south of Woodlawn Street. The feasibility of a road diet was studied for this segment to calm traffic and improve safety while maintaining operations. Much of this segment has no curb and instead utilizes flush shoulders and open drainage swales. This gives the area a suburban feel and context. Buildings are set far back from the roadway with parking lots between the roadside and building. There are currently few opportunities for shade for people walking or riding a bicycle. Figure 8: Segment 1A Map Although the number of crashes is not significant, there were recent crashes with fatalities along this segment. One occurred on June 1, 2019 in which a motorcyclist was killed in a crash at the intersection of Ft. Harrison Avenue and Belleview Boulevard. Another crash with fatality occurred on November 11, 2019 at the intersection of Ft. Harrison Avenue and Woodlawn Street. In addition to improving safety for vehicular traffic, increased safety is also desired to better serve transit users as they become pedestrians and cyclists to reach their final destinations. The Pinellas Trail runs parallel to Ft. Harrison Avenue in this segment on the west side. The trail crosses Ft. Harrison Avenue at the Belleview Boulevard intersection diagonally from the southwest corner to the northeast corner. Goals for Segment 1 were identified as: • Improve multimodal connections across corridor and into Downtown • Create a gateway into the City and Downtown SEGMENT 1B: Downtown Transition Segment 1B extends from Belleview Boulevard to Chestnut Street. The right-of-way is typically 60-foot wide and the posted speed limit is 30 MPH. This segment is the transition into Downtown Clearwater, serving important retail areas and the Morton Plant Hospital campus. Morton Plant 10 Hospital was included in project coordination and participated on the Project Visioning Team. The Pinellas Trail is located parallel and immediately adjacent to the corridor from south of Belleview Boulevard to south of Lakeview Road, where it diverges and runs parallel a few blocks east of Ft. Harrison Avenue. At Corbett Street, the context of the adjacent land uses changes from suburban to more urbanized as buildings are closer to the road and sidewalks. Lakeview Road connects Ft. Harrison Avenue to Myrtle Avenue/Alt US 19, serving as an alternate route through Downtown. Figure 9: Segment 1B Map The goals for Segment 1B are the same as Segment 1A which includes providing multimodal connections and a gateway into the City and Downtown. However, unlike Segment 1A, Segment 1B is three lanes already and contains mature trees, especially by the hospital campus. These factors provide a sense of enclosure and character along this segment that isn’t present in Segment 1A. The sense of enclosure is a key component of speed management and Complete Streets strategies. An additional goal for Segment 1B was identified during the first Project Visioning Team meeting and Walkshop that aims to increase the buffer and comfort level of the Pinellas Trail from Ft. Harrison Avenue vehicular traffic. SEGMENT 2: Downtown Core Segment 2 includes the Downtown Core, extending from Chestnut Street to Drew Street. The right-of-way varies from 55 feet to 70 feet and the posted speed limit is 30 MPH. This segment is characterized by buildings that abut the sidewalk, a grid of streets, and higher pedestrian activity. A significant portion of existing properties in this area is associated with the Church of Scientology. The Church of Scientology was included in project coordination and participated on the Project Visioning Team. In addition, the Cleveland Street intersection is a key retail node for the City. Because of the higher-level pedestrian activity, identifying the conditions of the existing infrastructure for people walking is even more critical. 11 Figure 10: Segment 2 Map The sidewalks in the Downtown Core are very narrow in some locations, such as the west side of Ft. Harrison Avenue north of Cleveland Street. In addition, tripping hazards like high curbs and obstructions in the sidewalk such as signs provide opportunities for improvement. The key goal for Segment 2 was identified as: • Use streetspace to create a welcoming, livable, and economically vibrant Downtown SEGMENT 3: Old Bay/North Marina Segment 3 extends from Drew Street to N. Myrtle Avenue. The right-of-way is 55 feet to 60 feet and the posted speed limit is 30 MPH. The southern portion is a transition area with a mix of low-scale commercial and residential uses. The portion between Eldridge Street and Cedar Street was included in the North Marina Area Master Plan study area (see Previous Studies) and provides access to the Seminole Street Boat Launch. North of Cedar Street, the adjacent context changes to predominantly single family residential. Figure 11: Segment 3 Map The sidewalks are in relatively poor condition and are not buffered from the roadway which makes walking uncomfortable. In addition, issues with overgrowth of vegetation was noted during the first Project Visioning Team meeting. 12 The key goal for Segment 3 was identified as: • Beautify the streetspace to attract investment and development to achieve future land use vision PUBLIC OUTREACH SUMMARY PROJECT VISIONING TEAM The Project Visioning Team (PVT) was made up of local business owners, residents, institutions, local agencies, and city staff who have an interest in improvements along the corridor. The PVT included representatives from different backgrounds, ages, and abilities to capture a greater cross-section of end users and develop solutions that may achieve a more inclusive street design. The PVT first met on November 13, 2019 for a project kick-off presentation and “Walkshop”. After the project team presented the project background, existing conditions, and potential design strategies, the team and the PVT traveled on the Jolley Trolley to various locations and walked the street to experience Ft. Harrison Avenue from a pedestrian’s perspective. Following the “Walkshop” the PVT discussed key observations, including the poor maintenance of the sidewalk, the feeling of danger along the narrow sidewalks, and a lack of identity for Ft. Harrison Avenue. The second and final PVT meeting was held virtually on June 5, 2020 and included a presentation with the preliminary concepts for the corridor. Feedback from the PVT on the preliminary recommendations was incorporated into the final report. Summaries of each meeting, as well as comments received regarding the draft concepts, can be found in the Appendix. Figure 12: Project Visioning Team Walkshop Photos 13 PUBLIC OUTREACH EVENT On February 28, 2020 the project team attended the Blast Friday event in Downtown Clearwater for a public outreach event. Information about the project and potential design strategies were illustrated. An estimated 300 people were reached, and attendees were provided with a pamphlet with further information and a link to the public survey. Figure 13: Blast Friday Word Cloud and Information Booth 14 PUBLIC SURVEY Public input was also received through an online survey. Nearly 650 postcards were mailed to residents and businesses within 250 feet on either side of Ft. Harrison Avenue in the study area to promote survey participation. The survey was open one week before Blast Friday and two weeks after. A total of 131 people participated. The survey offered participants the opportunity to share their experiences traveling along the Ft. Harrison Avenue corridor and help identify its future vision. Questions related to potential tradeoffs of different design techniques, impressions of the street today, and preferred design strategies. General demographic questions were also asked of survey respondents. Figure 15: Survey Responses Mode of Travel Figure 14: MetroQuest Survey 15 Figure 16: MetroQuest Survey Responses (Sample) 16 EVALUATING POTENTIAL IMPROVEMENTS A menu of design strategies was considered when developing recommendations to provide mobility, safety, and placemaking along the study corridor. DEMONSTRATION VS. PERMANENT PROJECTS In evaluating design strategies, the project team assessed the options for using Demonstration Projects versus Permanent Installation Projects to implement the study recommendations. Demonstration Projects are smaller, less expensive projects that can demonstrate certain traffic calming principles while allowing for real-time feedback and adjustments. Permanent Installation Projects are larger and more expensive projects that create permanent changes to infrastructure through long-term and more durable construction projects. Figure 17: Example of Demonstration vs. Permanent Installation Projects OTHER COMPLETE STREETS FEATURES Certain low-cost, high-impact complete streets features can be added to the corridor with minimal commitment. Implementing small, repeatable strategies such as those illustrated to the right can work in coordination throughout the corridor and create a safe, comfortable, and welcoming environment for pedestrians and cyclists. 17 DESIGN STRATEGIES The following design strategies were evaluated for potential implementation along the corridor: Clearly marked and designated bicycle facilities can create a safer street for all users and buffer the sidewalk from cars and trucks. When bicycle-specific facilities are installed, drivers know where to expect cyclists and cyclists are less likely to ride on the sidewalk, reducing potential conflicts with pedestrians. Intersection bulb-outs decrease the radius of a corner, slowing turning traffic and decreasing the distance a pedestrian will need to cross the street. The reclaimed public space may be used for placemaking and beautification. Midblock bulb-outs reclaim public space on the side of the road, buffering the sidewalk and reducing the distance to cross the street. Bulb-outs may be placed to "pinch" traffic or create a "chicaning" movement, calming vehicle traffic. Intersection is raised to slow traffic, emphasizing the intersection and reducing the risk of crashes. People cross at the same height as the sidewalk, increasing visibility. The new intersection may provide a placemaking opportunity for the corridor. 18 Existing parking spaces or extra pavement can be converted into small parks, sidewalk cafes, and other public spaces. The new gathering spaces created in front of businesses slow traffic with visual cues and people, as well as buffer the sidewalk. On-street parking protects the sidewalk from traffic and provides access to businesses. Traffic is calmed by cars slowing to park and people entering/exiting vehicles. Refuge islands create a safe resting or waiting spot for pedestrians crossing the street, either midblock or at intersections. Crossings and islands combined connect two sides of the street and calm traffic with the pedestrian presence. Landscaped islands can calm traffic and reduce vehicle speeds with vertical visual cues. New landscaping and beautification opportunities are also created. 19 RECOMMENDATIONS PROJECT CONCEPTS OVERVIEW The following recommendations address the corridor segments illustrated in Figure 7 and incorporate the design strategies previously outlined into concepts for each segment. Each selected design strategy provides its own unique benefits to enhancing the street and in combination, these strategies work together to provide the following key benefits consistent with the guiding principles. Figure 18: Cumulative Benefits of the Design Strategies In addition to specific improvements recommended for each segment, the following design strategies are recommended to be implemented throughout the corridor: • Intersection Bulb-Outs - reduce the radii at corners to slow turning traffic, reduce pedestrian crossing distances, and reclaim public space. • Landscaped Islands – add landscaping in center turn lane where turning movements are not needed. • Marked Crosswalks – add marked crosswalks at minor intersections to reinforce the grid, improves pedestrian connections, and calms traffic. SEGMENT 1A: City Gateway The recommended concept for Segment 1A (Belleair Road to Belleview Boulevard) reduces the number of lanes from four lanes to three lanes, improves connections to the Pinellas Trail, and creates a gateway into the City and Downtown. 20 The concept plan for Segment 1A includes: • Road Diet – reduce the number of lanes from 4 lanes with no turn lane to 3 lanes with a turn lane in the southern portion of the segment. • Landscaped Islands – add islands along the eastern side of the existing roadway to narrow the roadway to three lanes. • Pedestrian Crosswalk Refuge Islands – add refuge islands in the newly formed median just south of Belleair Road and south of Wildwood Way. • Bicycle Facilities – improve connections to the Pinellas Trail at Woodlawn Street. • Painted Intersection – enhance placemaking at Belleview Boulevard, to calms traffic and create a gateway into the Downtown. Figure 19 Segment 1A Proposed Improvements 21 Figure 20: Segment 1A Existing and Proposed Typical Sections Figure 21: Road Diet Concept Plan Belleair Road to Belleview Boulevard 22 Figure 22 Road Diet Concept Plan Belleview Boulevard Intersection The concept plan roll plot for both Segments 1A and 1B is included in Appendix D. The planning level opinion of probable costs for the improvements in Segment 1A (summarized in Figure 34) includes milling and resurfacing. The proposed concept maintains the existing curb and gutter on the east side of the roadway as a potential cost savings measure. Further investigation into the age and condition of the existing drainage system should be assessed to determine if replacement of the stormsewer system is warranted at this time. If that is the case, the curb could potentially be removed and the inlets and pipes relocated. Summary of Traffic Analysis for Road Diet The lane repurposing proposed for Ft. Harrison Avenue, specifically from the southbound approach at Belleview Boulevard through Belleair Road, is not projected to have a significantly negative impact on traffic conditions. At the controlling intersection of Ft. Harrison Avenue and Belleview Boulevard, peak-hour delays are projected to increase by less than seven seconds on average in the proposed configuration versus the existing lane configurations (both evaluated based on 2040 traffic projections). The overall intersection LOS remains at C or better for all scenarios. Along the un-interrupted segment, the projected traffic volume represents less than two-thirds of the maximum service volume and operates at LOS D in the PM peak hour. Although a traffic analysis was not included in the scope for the remainder of the study corridor, recommended improvements along the rest of the corridor are not expected to impact traffic operations in any significant way. Additionally, drivers can utilize Alt. US 19/Myrtle Avenue via Lakeview Road (Segment 1B) to travel through Downtown if desired; however, this study does not assume there would be such a shift to Lakeview Road. The full Traffic Memorandum for the study is included in Appendix C. 23 SEGMENT 1B: Downtown Transition The recommended concept for Segment 1B (Belleview Boulevard to Chestnut Street) maintains the existing three-lane section, with reconfigured intersections at Belleview Boulevard and Lakeview Road. A landscaped island replaces narrow on-street bike lanes, which creates an improved off-street facility with improved buffers and a wider Pinellas Trail along Ft. Harrison Avenue. The removal of the thru lane on eastbound Lakeview Road allows for a median refuge island to be added where the Trail crosses. Additional wayfinding signage may encourage drivers to utilize Lakeview Road, but there is limited opportunity to more substantially modify this intersection (e.g., to incorporate a roundabout) due to constrained rights-of-way. Further coordination with Morton Plant Hospital when translating these concepts to design and engineering drawings will be important. Consistent with Segment 1A, the concept plan includes: • Landscaped Islands – add landscaped islands along the eastern side of the roadway in the location of the current bike lane to buffer the Pinellas Trail. • Pedestrian Crosswalk Refuge Islands and Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFB) – add refuge islands on Lakeview Road at the Pinellas Trail crossing, and add a refuge island and RRFBs north of Pine Street on Ft. Harrison Avenue by the Clearwater Historical Society Museum and Cultural Center. Additional crosswalk locations may also include refuge islands • Bicycle Facilities – remove unbuffered bike lanes and improve off-street facilities. • Painted Intersection – enhance intersection at Lakeview Road to create placemaking and calm traffic. Figure 23 Segment 1B Proposed Improvements 24 Figure 24: Segment 1B Existing and Proposed Typical Sections Figure 25: Concept Plan from Belleview Boulevard to north of Lakeview Road 25 Figure 26 Concept Plan Reconfigured Lakeview Road Intersection SEGMENT 2: Downtown Core The recommended concept for Ft. Harrison Avenue from Chestnut Street to Drew Street in the Downtown Core creates a more welcoming, livable, and economically vibrant Downtown, increases and improves space for people walking, and provides an opportunity for additional landscaping and beautification. The Segment 2 concept plan includes: • On-Street Parking, Loading, and Parklet Opportunities – eliminate the northbound left turn lane at Pierce Street and the southbound left turn lane at Cleveland Street to create space for designated loading area, on-street parking, parklets and a wider sidewalk. • Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFB) – add RRFBs at the existing Hendricks Street crossing to increase pedestrian safety. • Pedestrian Crosswalk Refuge Islands – add refuge islands at existing Park and Franklin Streets crossings where RRFBs are already installed. • Painted Intersection – enhance placemaking at Drew Street, calm traffic, and create a gateway into the Downtown Core. 26 Figure 27 Segment 2 Proposed Improvements Figure 28: Existing and Proposed Typical Section North of Cleveland Street 27 Figure 29: Concept Plan Removing Northbound Left Turn Lane at Pierce Street The southbound left turn lane at Cleveland Street is recommended to be removed. The sidewalk on the west side of Ft. Harrison Avenue north of Cleveland Street is narrow and the curb is unusually tall, which can be a tripping hazard. The removal of the left turn lane allows the western sidewalk to be expanded to provide more pedestrian space and addresses the tall curb. On-street parking could be added as well, which would also provide space for potential parklets, as illustrated in Figure 28. The center turn lane in front of the Ft. Harrison Hotel is used often for loading and unloading deliveries. In addition, the pedestrian drop-off space in front of the hotel requires vehicles to encroach into the sidewalk. A solution to these two undesirable conditions is shown in the concept plan in Figure 29. At each of the suggested locations for left turn lane removal, vehicles may still turn left. There would be a negligible impact to traffic operations as the well-connected grid of streets in the Downtown Core provides many options for drivers to reach their destinations. Both proposed left turn lane removals could be assessed further by utilizing temporary closures to test impacts prior to final design and construction. 28 Figure 30: Photo of Delivery Truck in Center Turn Lane and Drop-off Zone within Sidewalk This concept plan has been coordinated with the Church of Scientology. The Church has provided renderings for these improvements. With this concept, loading and unloading of deliveries and passengers can occur at the curb side. Figure 31: Renderings of Concept Removing Left Turn Lane in Front of Ft. Harrison Hotel (from Church of Scientology) 29 SEGMENT 3: Old Bay/North Marina The recommended improvements in Segment 3 address the portions of Ft. Harrison Avenue to the north and south of the North Marina area, for which concepts were previously developed, in addition to proposing some design strategies in the North Marina area. Proposed changes would beautify the streetscape to attract investment and development without needing to move existing curbs. The recommendations include narrowing and chicaning travel lanes to calm vehicular traffic north of Eldridge Street, and using landscaping to create a larger buffers to the existing sidewalk which should improve pedestrian comfort along the corridor. This also creates opportunities for additional on-street parking to support businesses along the corridor. Between Drew Street and Eldridge Street, limited landscaped median islands can be incorporated into the existing continuous left turn lane to further support traffic calming. Continued from previous segments, the concept plan includes: • Landscaped Islands – add limited landscaped median islands where turning movements are not needed. • Chicaning – add midblock bulb-outs while maintaining the existing curb to narrow the roadway and create a “chicaning” movement to encourage drivers to not speed. • On-Street Parking – add on-street parking where needed within midblock bulb-outs. • Painted Intersection – calm traffic and enhance placemaking at Seminole Street, a major intersection in the heart of the Old Bay District of Downtown. Figure 32 Segment 3 Proposed Improvements 30 Figure 33: Segment 3 Existing and Proposed Typical Sections PLANNING LEVEL OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS A planning level opinion of probable costs was developed for the permanent installation of each of the proposed improvement concepts proposed in this study. The cost breakdown includes an estimate of the construction costs, professional services (costs such as surveying and design/engineering), and construction administration (referred to as Construction Engineering and Inspection or CEI in the table). Since costs are planning level only, they are subject to change as the recommendations move into future phases. Although not anticipated, costs of any minor right-of-way acquisition have not been included and costs for utility relocations have also not been identified or included. Costs estimated in this study are for standalone improvements not associated with any future project. Improvements that require restriping of lanes also assume milling and resurfacing in the restriping areas. Cost savings could potentially be realized by reducing the resurfacing area to just what is necessary. Segments 1A, 2, and 3 include milling and resurfacing to update striping. 31 Figure 34: Planning Level Opinion of Probable Costs The city has planned a future utility reconstruction project along Ft. Harrison Avenue that will require full reconstruction of the majority of the corridor. This project will be done in phases and take about five years to complete. Many of the improvements recommended in this study may be beneficial to implement prior to the larger reconstruction project and could be implemented in a more temporary, less expensive way, if desired so they could be removed or modified during the construction process. Demonstration projects, as previously discussed and shown in Figure 17, would allow the city to test the locations of some of the proposed design strategies using paint and other low cost materials, allowing the city to evaluate locations and changes before investing in more permanent infrastructure as part of the Ft. Harrison Avenue Reconstruction Project. Larger, more expensive projects, such as landscaped islands requiring new curb and gutter, would be constructed later after the stormwater and utilities work is completed. Segment 1A (0.4 miles) Segment 1B (1.1 miles) Segment 2 (0.5 miles) Segment 3 (1.2 miles)TOTALS CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL 671,234$ 625,953$ 620,741$ 837,643$ 2,755,571$ PROJECT UNKNOWNS (20% OF SUBTOTAL)134,247$ 125,191$ 124,148$ 167,529$ 551,114$ TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST 805,481$ 751,144$ 744,889$ 1,005,171$ 3,306,686$ SURVEY (6% OF TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST)48,329$ 45,069$ 44,693$ 60,310$ 198,401$ DESIGN (12% OF TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST)96,658$ 90,137$ 89,387$ 120,621$ 396,802$ CEI (7% OF TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST)56,384$ 52,580$ 52,142$ 70,362$ 231,468$ TOTAL SURVEY, DESIGN & CEI 201,370$ 187,786$ 186,222$ 251,293$ 826,671$ ESTIMATED TOTAL 1,006,851$ 938,930$ 931,112$ 1,256,464$ 4,133,357$ FT HARRISON AVENUE COMPLETE STREETS STUDY CONCEPT ENGINEERS OPINION OF PROBABLE COST Segment 32 APPENDIX 33 APPENDIX A: PROJECT VISIONING TEAM #1 MEETING The Project Visioning Team (PVT) met on November 13, 2019 for a project kick-off presentation and Walkshop. The presentation included the project background of the corridor and potential design strategies, followed by a brief discussion. The Team then began the Walkshop portion, which included traveling as a group to a few locations in the study area to get out and walk the corridor study area. The PVT included users of different backgrounds, ages, and abilities, emphasizing the need for a more inclusive street design. This allowed the Team to experience the corridor outside of a car, as a person walking, biking, or taking the bus would feel along the street. After walking portions of each segment of Ft. Harrison Avenue, there was a brief discussion about the key observations along the corridor which included the poor maintenance of the sidewalks, the feeling of danger along narrow and back of curb sidewalks, and a lack of identity for Ft. Harrison Avenue as a street leading into Clearwater’s Downtown Core. Page 1 of 4 CITY OF CLEARWATER FT HARRISON AVE COMPLETE STREETS STUDY PROJECT VISIONING GROUP MEETING #1 Wednesday, November 13, 2019 I. ATTENDEES Name Organization Ric Hartman City of Clearwater Lauren Matzke City of Clearwater Mark Suarez HDR Steve Schukraft HDR Mackenzie Bland HDR Crystal Odoh HDR Tyler Valila HDR Gloria Lepik Corrigan PSTA TRAC Lisa Mansell Church of Scientology David Lillesand Downtown Neighborhood Association Chuck Lane City of Clearwater Greg Stading Bay Care Health System Cammie Weeks PCS Stephanie Carrier PCS Bryant Johnson SW/GS David Nugent Police Joan Rice Pinellas County Brian Smith BPDR Amanda Thompson City of Clearwater Catherine Corcoran City of Clearwater F. Bowling Clearwater Brewing Company Diego Guevara City of Clearwater Roger Johnson City of Clearwater Karen Cunningham CNC Rick Perez COL – Planning James Warman CFR Mandee Steele Amplify Clearwater Michael Shumaker Town of Belleview Janelle Branch The Ring Denise Sanderson City of Clearwater Page 2 of 4 II. PRESENTATION  A presentation was given by Ric Hartman and Mark Suarez. A PDF copy of the presentation is attached.  Comments from the PVT group o High rate of no vehicle ownership is interesting and notable o Portion of disabled population may be immobile residents in nursing home o Hospital campus on the corridor would likely have many employees with lower incomes who would benefit from better transit access o Discussion over why wide driveways are a negative o Concern for gentrification and making sure that the improvements are for the people who are already there III. WALKSHOP COMMENTS  Segment 1A: Belleair Rd to Belleview Blvd o Poor trail signage – need better wayfinding for Pinellas trail o Other than the sign at the downtown bypass, need better wayfinding signage for downtown o Increase/add pedestrian crossing opportunities o Sidewalk and vegetation maintenance  Cracks in sidewalk  Overhanging tree branches o Dangerous pedestrian conditions o Enhance/add bike facilities o Lane reduction preferred  4 lane to 3 lane road diet  Segment 1B: Belleview Blvd to Chestnut St o Narrow sidewalk o Sidewalk maintenance issues  Cracks and vegetation growing o Dangerous pedestrian conditions o Increase crossing opportunities o Driveways and turning lanes unsafe for pedestrians o Trail  Wayfinding  Possibly add a rest area for the trail  Add signage about Pinellas Trail and Clearwater (including Downtown signage) Page 3 of 4 o Hospital access/circulation issues and wayfinding o Bike lanes are narrow  Bike lane is next to trail  Pavement markings for bikes  Segment 2: Chestnut St to Drew St o “Blast Friday” that occurs once a month closes the intersection of Cleveland St. & Ft. Harrison  Many pedestrian drop-offs at this location o Consider widening narrow sidewalks o Signs / poles throughout the sidewalks o Enhance pedestrian crossings o New development south of Drew which will potentially result in more pedestrians o Driveway and vehicle conflicts with pedestrians  Segment 3: Drew St to N Myrtle Ave o Sidewalk maintenance  Overgrown vegetation in the ROW and on private property o Beautification of area needed o ADA compliance issues o Better signage needed o Peak hour congestion turning right onto Fairmont to reach Alt-19 IV. WALKSHOP DEBRIEF  Poor maintenance of sidewalks o Other maintenance issues  Light poles  Would like to see lower maintenance designs  North end (Segment 3) feels neglected  Need identity for Ft Harrison o Street signs are small and it’s difficult to know what road you’re on o As a pedestrian you make choices every block; need better wayfinding to help with this  Morton Plant Hospital considerations o Ambulances and fire trucks will use the area heavily o Jeffords is a tight turn and the curb has been damaged by emergency vehicles o Jeffords and Pinellas are primary emergency routes Page 4 of 4  Designed to loop the streets – Jeffords to get into the hospital and Pinellas to exit o High pedestrian traffic across Ft Harrison between Jeffords and Pinellas  Due to parking for hospital employees across the street  Bicycles o Mark bicycle lanes o Bike lane next to Pinellas trail may be redundant  Connect street to trail network  Noise o Road is very loud as a pedestrian  Vehicle speeds are too high  High vehicle speeds, especially on Segment 1B, gives pedestrians a feeling of fear  Making street safer for pedestrians can help with sight distance on side streets  Education o Educate people about the benefits of traffic calming o People will complain about increasing travel times, even though times may not increase too much  Priorities o Signage  Inexpensive  Pedestrian signage  Directing people to the hospital on Myrtle  Parking in downtown o Add color/beautification to the street o Markings on sidewalk where it is for bikes and pedestrians o Maintenance of sidewalk (especially weeds growing) o Diverting through traffic to other corridors Page 7 of 7 V. PRESENTATION Complete Streets StudyProject Visioning Team Meeting #1 – November 13, 2019FT HARRISON AVENUE PROJECT BACKGROUND8:30 am – 8:50 amCORRIDOR OVERVIEW8:50 am – 9:10 amDESIGN STRATEGIES9:10 am – 9:30 amWALKSHOP9:30 am – 11:30 am2 PROJECT BACKGROUND3 PROJECT OVERVIEW4BELLEAIR RDBELLEVIEW BLVDCOURTSTDREWSTN MYRTLEAVESTUDY LIMITSLAKEVIEWRDCHESTNUTSTJEFFORDS STFT HARRISON AVELIMITS: Ft. Harrison Avenue from Belleair Rd to N Myrtle Ave3.2MILESCITY OF CLEARWATERJURISDICTIONCONNECTEDNESS TO KEY DESTINATIONS•CLEARWATER BEACH•SEMINOLE BOAT RAMP•PARK ST TRANSIT CENTER•MORTON PLANT HOSPITAL•CITY OF LARGO•CITY OF DUNEDIN•US ALT-19 & US 19•SR 6019AFAIRMONT STSEMINOLE STCOUNTY COURTHOUSEMAIN LIBRARYBELLEAIRCOUNTRY CLUBMORTON PLANT HOSPITALSEMINOLE BOAT RAMPCOACHMAN PARKGULF TO BAY BLVDCITY MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDINGPUBLIX SUPER MARKET 5PROJECT PURPOSE5DEVELOP CONCEPTS TO ADVANCE CLEARWATER’S MOBILITY, SAFETY, AND PLACEMAKINGOBJECTIVES THROUGH A COMPLETE STREETS APPROACHDEFINE ACHIEVABLE IMPROVEMENTSFOR THE CORRIDORDEFINE PRIORITY IMPROVEMENTPROJECTS TO MOVE FORWARD INTOENGINEERING AND DESIGNDEFINING SUCCESS & INITIAL DESIGN STRATEGIESALTERNATIVES ASSESSMENT & TRAFFIC ANALYSISPUBLIC WORKSHOPREFINE CONCEPTSCITY COUNCIL PRESENTATIONSCHEDULE 6WHAT IS A COMPLETE STREET?6PLACEMAKINGCOMPLETE STREETS REALLOCATESTREETSPACE TO BE DESIGNED FOR AND OPERATED BY EVERYONEINCLUDING VEHICLES, TRANSIT, PEDESTRIANS, & CYCLISTS OF ALL AGES & ABILITIESSAFETY•Good bicycle and pedestrian infrastructureis safer for all users•Crash & injury risk can be reduced withslower speeds•Walking & biking for short trips (under 1 mile)improves personal health and the environmentMOBILITY•1 in 5 Americans will be over 65 by 2025•1 in 5 people in the US currently have adisabilityHEALTH•Slower and fewer cars create a more vibrant,livable place•Community is fostered in outside spaces 7COMPLETE STREETS FOR CLEARWATERIMPLEMENTATION PLAN7“PROVIDE ANETWORKOF STREETS ANDBALANCEDTRANSPORTATION OPTIONS THAT ARESAFERAND MOREEFFICIENTFOREVERYONE....”GUIDING PRINCIPLES•SAFE, COMFORTABLE TRAVEL•TRANSPORTATION ACCESSIBILITY•MULTIMODAL MOBILITY•CONNECTED AND INVITING•ECONOMIC VITALITY AND PLACEMAKING•COMMUNITY HEALTH•SOCIAL EQUITY AND INVESTMENT•COMMUNITY CHARACTER AND CONTEXT SENSITIVITY•ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND SUSTAINABILITY•TECHNOLOGYIMPROVE SAFETY FOR ALL MODESSUPPORT LOCAL BUSINESSES AND COMMUNITYIMPROVE PERSONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTHSERVE RESIDENTS WITHOUT VEHICLE ACCESS FDOT, MAY 2019Project goalsoImprove traffic operations on US Alt-19ImportanceoCorridor serves as alternative N-S corridor to Ft Harrison AveoImproved operations on corridor will allow for more successfultraffic calming and safety measures on Ft Harrison AveProposed roundabout to relieve traffic congestion forvehicles going from northbound Ft Harrison Ave ontonorthbound Alt-19US ALT-19 & FAIRMONT ST ROUNDABOUT8N MYRTLE AVE19AMINNESOTA DRFAIRMONT STAPACHE TRAILMOHAWK STPLEASANT ST FORWARD PINELLAS, OCTOBER 2019Project goalsoImprove safety, accessibility, and connectivity with land usesoSupport existing businesses and future growthoPromote active living with improved access to trailsDrew StoNorth border of Segment 2 (Downtown)Concept for Drew St corridor at intersection with Ft HarrisonAveImprovements:oBike infrastructureoRoad diet from four lanes to two lanesoAdditional parkingoImproved streetscapeCOMPLETEDREW ST PROJECT9 CITY OF CLEARWATER, JANUARY 2016Redevelopment plan for area surrounding the SeminoleBoat RampFuture land useoPrimarily Central Business District (CBD) and CommercialGeneral (CG)oSmall portions of Institutional (I) and Residential Urban (RU)On Ft Harrison AveoWider sidewalksoActivated corners as social areasoEnhanced interface between pedestrian zone and building usesoAvoid driveway conflicts with pedestriansoSingle-story retailoMid-rise residentialFt Harrison Ave & Seminole StoGateway featureNORTH MARINA AREA PLANON FT HARRISON AVE10 AREA TRANSIT11BUS ROUTE 52/52LXDOWNTOWN CLEARWATER – DOWNTOWN ST. PETERSBURG•EXPRESS SERVICE DURING PEAK HOURS•30 MIN HEADWAYS MON-SAT•1 HR HEADWAYS SUN & HOLIDAYSBUS ROUTE 52/52LXDOWNTOWN CLEARWATER –DOWNTOWN ST. PETERSBURGBUS ROUTE 66LTARPON SPRINGS – PARK STREET TERMINAL•LIMITED STOP ROUTE•90 MIN HEADWAYS DURING PEAK HOURSMON-FRI•NO SAT, SUN, OR HOLIDAY SERVICEBUS ROUTE 66LTARPON SPRINGS – PARK STREET TERMINALCLEARWATER FERRYDOWNTOWN CLEARWATER –CLEARWATER BEACHSUNCOAST & JOLLEY TROLLEYDOWNTOWN CLEARWATER –CLEARWATER BEACHSUNCOAST & JOLLEY TROLLEYDOWNTOWN CLEARWATER –CLEARWATER BEACH•30 MIN HEADWAYS MON – SUN &HOLIDAYS•JOLLEY TROLLEY SERVICE BETWEEN 9:45AM – 1:45 PM•EXTENDED SERVICE ON WEEKENDSCLEARWATER FERRYDOWNTOWN CLEARWATER –CLEARWATER BEACH•1 HR HEADWAYS THU – SUN•INCREASED SERVICE DURING PEAKHOURSCOURTSTN MYRTLEAVECHESTNUTST19APIERCE STPARK STCLEARWATER MEMORIAL CAUSEWAY CORRIDOR OVERVIEW12 13AREA STATISTICS13POPULATION BELOW POVERTY LEVEL24%16%14%COUNTYCITYCORRIDORPERCENT OF POPULATIONMINORITY POPULATION26%20%26%PERCENT OF POPULATIONCOUNTYCITYCORRIDORMEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME$24k$45k$47kINCOME IN DOLLARSCOUNTYCITYCORRIDORPOPULATION UNDER 1816%19%17%COUNTYCITYCORRIDORPERCENT OF POPULATIONPOPULATION OVER 6521%21%24%PERCENT OF POPULATIONCOUNTYCITYCORRIDORHOUSEHOLDS WITH NO VEHICLES22%12%9%PERCENT OF POPULATIONCOUNTYCITYCORRIDOR SEGMENTSBELLEAIR RDBELLEVIEW BLVDCOURTSTDREWSTN MYRTLEAVESEGMENT 1BSEGMENT 2LAKEVIEWRDCHESTNUTSTJEFFORDS ST14SEGMENTATION BASED ON:•CHARACTER•CONTEXT•LAND USE•EXISTING TYPICAL SECTIONS•AVAILABLE RIGHT-OF-WAY19ABELLEAIR RD TO BELLEVIEW BLVD SEGMENT 1ABELLEVIEW BLVD TO CHESTNUT STSEGMENT 1BCHESTNUT ST TO DREW STSEGMENT 2DREW ST TO N MYRTLE AVE SEGMENT 3 SEGMENT 1A BELLEAIR RD TO BELLEVIEW BLVD15BELLEAIR RDBELLEVIEW BLVD15Residential24%Retail/Office19%Institutional11%Industrial5%Recreation8%Public Spaces5%Vacant9%Other19%LAND USESWhite81%Black/African-American13%Asian3%Other3%RACE2.5kPEOPLE$24.5kMEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME22%BELOW POVERTY LINE21%HOUSEHOLDS WITH NO VEHICLES2.2AVERAGE HOUSEHOLD SIZE17%UNDER 1824%OVER 6520%PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES***DATA INCLUDES SEGMENT 1A AND 1B*DATA TAKEN FROM ½ MILE WALKSHED BASED ON THE 2016 ACS**CONTEXT CLASSIFICATIONS PROVIDED IN COMPLETE STREETS FOR CLEARWATER IMPLEMENTATION PLANWOODLAWN STWILDWOOD WAY CHARACTERISTICS16100’TYPICAL ROW30 MPHPOSTED SPEED•NO CURB•LITTLE SHADETYPICAL SECTION4LANEUNDIVIDEDSEGMENT 1A BELLEAIR RD TO BELLEVIEW BLVD•WIDE DRIVEWAYS•UNBUFFERED SIDEWALKSIN SOME AREAS SEGMENT 1B BELLEVIEW BLVD TO CHESTNUT ST17FT HARRISONAVEBELLEVIEWBLVDLAKEVIEW RDBELLEAIRCOUNTRY CLUBMORTON PLANT HOSPITALPUBLIX SUPER MARKETCONTEXT CLASSIFICATION:SUBURBANCONTEXT CLASSIFICATION:URBAN GENERALCONTEXT CLASSIFICATION:URBAN GENERALWEST SIDECONTEXT CLASSIFICATION:URBAN CENTEREAST SIDECORBETT STResidential24%Retail/Office19%Institutional11%Industrial5%Recreation8%Public Spaces5%Vacant9%Other19%LAND USESWhite81%Black/African-American13%Asian3%Other3%RACE2.5kPEOPLE$24.5kMEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME22%BELOW POVERTY LINE21%HOUSEHOLDS WITH NO VEHICLES2.2AVERAGE HOUSEHOLD SIZE17%UNDER 1824%OVER 6520%PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES***DATA INCLUDES SEGMENT 1A AND 1B*DATA TAKEN FROM ½ MILE WALKSHED BASED ON THE 2016 ACS**CONTEXT CLASSIFICATIONS PROVIDED IN COMPLETE STREETS FOR CLEARWATER IMPLEMENTATION PLANMCLENNAN STE STA ST 18CHARACTERISTICS60’TYPICAL ROW30 MPHPOSTED SPEED•PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS•INTERMITTENT TREES•UNBUFFERED SIDEWALKSTYPICAL SECTION2LANESWITH TWLTLSEGMENT 1B BELLEVIEW BLVD TO CHESTNUT ST•TRANSITION INTODOWNTOWN•TRAIL SEPARATESFROM ROW SEGMENT 2 CHESTNUT ST TO DREW ST19FT HARRISONAVEPIERCE STCOURT STDREW STOSCEOLA AVECLEVELAND STCHESTNUT STPINELLAS COUNTY COURTHOUSECHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGYCLEARWATER MAIN LIBRARYResidential8%Retail/Office20%Institutional7%Industrial3%Public Spaces8%Vacant20%Other34%LAND USESBlack/African-American4%Asian1%Other2%White93%RACE1.2kPEOPLE$30kMEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME18%BELOW POVERTY LINE35%HOUSEHOLDS WITH NO VEHICLES1.9AVERAGE HOUSEHOLD SIZE5%UNDER 1835%OVER 6528%PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIESCONTEXT CLASSIFICATION:URBAN CORE*DATA TAKEN FROM ½ MILE WALKSHED BASED ON THE 2016 ACS**CONTEXT CLASSIFICATIONS PROVIDED IN COMPLETE STREETS FOR CLEARWATER IMPLEMENTATION PLANPARK STHENDRICKS ST 20CHARACTERISTICS55’ –70’TYPICAL ROW30 MPHPOSTED SPEED•PEDESTRIAN FRIENDLY DEVELOPMENT•INTERMITTENT TREES & SHADE•TRAFFIC CONGESTION DURING PEAK TIMESTYPICAL SECTION2LANEWITH TWLTLSEGMENT 2 CHESTNUT ST TO DREW ST SEGMENT 3 DREW ST TO N MYRTLE AVE FT HARRISONAVEDREW STN MYRTLE AVE19ASEMINOLE BOAT RAMPNORTH WARD ELEMENTARY21White64%Black/African-American27%Asian1%Other8%RACE2.5kPEOPLE$40kMEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME27%BELOW POVERTY LINE19%HOUSEHOLDS WITH NO VEHICLES2.2AVERAGE HOUSEHOLD SIZE16%UNDER 1817%OVER 6515%PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIESCONTEXT CLASSIFICATION:URBAN CENTERResidential33%Retail/Office10%Institutional2%Industrial3%Public Spaces9%Vacant14%Other29%LAND USES21*DATA TAKEN FROM ½ MILE WALKSHED BASED ON THE 2016 ACS**CONTEXT CLASSIFICATIONS PROVIDED IN COMPLETE STREETS FOR CLEARWATER IMPLEMENTATION PLANJONES STN GARDEN AVE 22CHARACTERISTICS55’ –60’TYPICAL ROW30 MPHPOSTED SPEED•SEMINOLE ST BOATRAMP ACCESS•POOR SIDEWALKS &CROSSINGSTYPICAL SECTION2LANESWITH TWLTLSEGMENT 3 DREW ST TO N MYRTLE AVE •UNBUFFERED & NARROWSIDEWALKS•NO TREES & SHADE DEFINING SUCCESSBELLEAIR RDCOURTSTDREWSTN MYRTLEAVESEGMENT 1BDOWNTOWN TRANSITIONSEGMENT 2DOWNTOWN CORELAKEVIEWRDCHESTNUTSTJEFFORDS ST23Segment 1•Improve multimodal connectionsacross corridor & into downtown•Create agatewayinto the City &downtownSegment 2•Use streetspace to create awelcoming, livable, &economically vibrantdowntownSegment 3•Beautifythe streetspace toattract investment anddevelopmentto achieve futureland use visionBELLEVIEW BLVD DESIGN STRATEGIES24 2525POP-UP PROJECTPERMANENT INSTALLATIONSMALLER PROJECTSLARGER PROJECTSHIGHER COSTLOWER COSTREAL TIME FEEDBACKLONG TERM FEEDBACKSMALLER PROJECTS WITH SHORT IMPLEMENTATIONSCHEDULESPROJECTS CAN BE SHORT-TERM OR LONG-TERMSUCCESS CAN INSPIRE PERMANENT CHANGESLARGERPROJECTS WITH LONGERIMPLEMENTATIONSCHEDULESPROJECTS CAN BE LONGER LASTINGSUCCESS CAN CREATEREPEAT PROJECTS POP-UP PROJECTPERMANENT INSTALLATION26LIGHTINGLANDSCAPING & BEAUTIFICATIONDESIGN STRATEGIESMEDIAN REFUGE ISLANDSProtected break in crossing to reduce exposure time for pedestrians ADDED BENEFITSREDUCES VEHICLE SPEEDSPROTECTS CROSSING PEDESTRIANSINCREASES CROSS-STREET CONNECTIONS 27POP-UP PROJECTPERMANENT INSTALLATIONPOP-UP PROJECTPERMANENT INSTALLATIONCurb line is extended to reduce the curb radius at intersections or narrow the roadway midblockLANDSCAPING & BEAUTIFICATIONMIDBLOCKINTERSECTIONSDESIGN STRATEGIESBULB-OUTSCALMS TRAFFICRECLAIMS PUBLIC SPACEINCREASE VISIBILITYADDED BENEFITSREDUCES CROSSING DISTANCES POP-UP PROJECTPERMANENT INSTALLATION28Conversion of parking spaces to small parks, sidewalk cafés, and other public spacesINCREASES LOCAL FOOT AND BIKE TRAFFICBOOSTS SALES FOR NEARBY BUSINESSESCREATES VIBRANT STREET ENVIRONMENTDESIGN STRATEGIES PARKLETSADDED BENEFITSCALMS TRAFFICLANDSCAPING & BEAUTIFICATIONFLEXIBLE SPACE 29POP-UP PROJECTPERMANENT INSTALLATIONPOP-UP PROJECTPERMANENT INSTALLATIONBOOST SALES FOR NEARBY BUSINESSESCYCLE TRACKONE-WAY LANESDESIGN STRATEGIES PROTECTED BIKE LANESPROTECT PEDESTRIANSADDED BENEFITSREDUCE VEHICLE CONGESTIONIMPROVE SAFETY FOR CYCLISTSCALM TRAFFICBuffered and protected bike lanes or cycle tracks can be placed within the current right-of-way 30ENHANCED & ACCESSIBLE BUS STOPS30OTHER COMPLETE STREETS STRATEGIESDRIVEWAY CLOSURESHUMAN-SCALE WAYFINDINGPAINTED CROSSWALKSBIKE PARKING 31LANDSCAPING & BEAUTIFICATIONREDUCES SPEEDS AND VEHICULAR CRASHESBOOSTS SALES FOR NEARBY BUSINESSESROAD DIETGREAT CANDIDATEGOOD CANDIDATE IN MANY INSTANCESGOOD CANDIDATE IN MOST INSTANCESPOSSIBLE CANDIDATE PENDING FEASIBILITY STUDY< 10,00015,00020,00025,000 +MAXIMUM VALUE ADT *A four-lane roadway can be narrowed to a two-lane roadway, possibly with a middle two-way left-turn lane*ACCORDING TO FHWAADDED BENEFITSREALLOCATES FOR OTHER USERSIMPROVE PEDESTRIAN EXPERIENCE*DATA FROM SAFETY.FHWA.DOT.GOV WALKSHOP32 POTENTIAL IMPROVEMENTSROUNDABOUTSRAISED INTERSECTIONSINTERSECTION RECONFIGURATIONSINTERSECTION BULB-OUTSMIDBLOCK BULB-OUTSLANDSCAPED MEDIANSREFUGE ISLANDSFLASHING (RRFB) CROSSINGSPROTECTED BICYCLE FACILITIESPARKLETSON-STREET PARKINGSHARED ROAD (SHARROWS)33 © 2014 HDR Architecture, Inc., all rights reserved.© 2014 HDR Architecture, Inc., all rights reserved.© 2014 HDR Architecture, Inc., all rights reserved.© 2014 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved.© 2014 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved.© 2014 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved.© 2014 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved. Page 7 of 7 VI.WALKSHOP MATERIALS WALKSHOP OVERVIEW & AGENDA1BELLEAIR RDBELLEVIEW BLVDCOURT STDREW STN MYRTLE AVESTUDY LIMITSLAKEVIEW RDCHESTNUT STJEFFORDS STFT HARRISON AVELIMITS: Ft. Harrison Avenue from Belleair Rd to N Myrtle Ave19AFAIRMONT STSEMINOLE STGULF TO BAY BLVDMAIN LIBRARYCOUNTY COURTHOUSEPUBLIX SUPER MARKETBELLEAIRE COUNTRY CLUBMORTON PLANT HOSPITALSEMINOLE BOAT RAMPCOACHMAN PARKCITY MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDINGCLEVELAND ST11:30 AM – 11:55 PM1BELLEVIEW BLVD10:35 AM – 11:00 AM12TURNER ST10:50 AM – 11:25 AM2SEMINOLE ST12:00 PM – 12:25 PM 43DEPART FROM LIBRARY10:30 AM3RIDE IN TROLLEY TO 1STDESTINATIONOBSERVE AND DISCUSS CORRIDOR WHILE DRVINGPARK AT BELLEAIR LANDINGAND EXIT TROLLEYWALK FROM BELLEVIEW BLVD TO LAKEVIEW RDOBSERVE AND DISCUSS SEGMENTS 1A & 1BEXIT TROLLEY AT FT HARRISON & PINE BUS STOP* PARK AT PUBLIXWALK FROM BUS STOP TO TURNER STOBSERVE AND DISCUSS SEGMENT 1BSTOP ON PARK ST AND EXIT TROLLEYWALK FROM PARK ST TO HENDRICKS STOBSERVE AND DISCUSS SEGMENT 2EXIT TROLLEY AT FT HARRISON & NICHOLSON BUS STOPWALK FROM SEMINOLE ST TO GEORGIA STOBSERVE AND DISCUSS SEGMENT 3RETURN TO LIBRARY12:30 PMREGROUP & DISCUSS CORRIDORRIDE OR WALK TO LIBRARY 4/TURNER ST SEGMENT 1A BELLEAIR RD TO BELLEVIEW BLVD2BELLEAIR RDBELLEVIEW BLVDNOTES•No curb•Little shade•Wide driveways•Unbuffered sidewalks in some areas1.Improve multimodal connectionsacross corridor & into downtown2.Create agateway into the City & downtownDRIVE & OBSERVE SEGMENT 1ACHARACTERISTICSSEGMENT GOALSWOODLAWN STWILDWOOD WAY SEGMENT 1B BELLEVIEW BLVD TO CHESTNUT ST3BELLEVIEW BLVDLAKEVIEW RDBELLEAIRCOUNTRY CLUBMORTON PLANT HOSPITALPUBLIX SUPER MARKETCORBETT STFT HARRISON AVECONTEXT CLASSIFICATION:SUBURBANCONTEXT CLASSIFICATION:URBAN GENERALCONTEXT CLASSIFICATION:URBAN GENERALWEST SIDECONTEXT CLASSIFICATION:URBAN CENTEREAST SIDENOTES•Pedestrian crossings•Intermittent tress•Unbuffered sidewalks•Transition into downtown•Trail separates from ROW•Improve multimodal connectionsacross corridor & into downtown•Create a gatewayinto the City & downtownEND WALKINGSTART WALKING12APPROX. 6 MIN WALKAPPROX. 2 MIN WALKCHARACTERISTICSSEGMENT GOALSMCLENNAN STE STA ST •Pedestrian friendly development•Intermittent trees & shade•Traffic congestion during peak times•Using streetscape to create a welcoming, livable, & economically vibrant downtownSEGMENT 2 CHESTNUT ST TO DREW ST4FT HARRISON AVEPIERCE STCOURT STDREW STOSCEOLA AVECLEVELAND STCHESTNUT STPINELLAS COUNTY BUILDINGSCHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGYCLEARWATER MAIN LIBRARYCONTEXT CLASSIFICATION:URBAN CORENOTESEND WALKINGSTART WALKINGPARK ST3APPROX. 5 MIN WALKCHARACTERISTICSSEGMENT GOALSHENDRICKS ST SEGMENT 3 DREW ST TO N MYRTLE AVE FT HARRISON AVEDREW STN MYRTLE AVE19ASEMINOLE BOAT RAMPNORTH WARD ELEMENTARY5FAIRMONT STCONTEXT CLASSIFICATION:URBAN CENTERNOTES•Seminole St. boat ramp access•Poor sidewalks & crossings•Unbuffered & narrow sidewalks•No trees & shade•Underutilized ROWCHARACTERISTICSSEGMENT GOALS•Beautifythe streetscape to attract investment & development to achieve future land use visionEND WALKINGSTART WALKINGAPPROX. 5 MIN WALK4OPTIONAL WALK BACK TO LIBRARYAPPROX. 7 MIN WALKJONES STN GARDEN AVE 79 APPENDIX B: PROJECT VISIONING TEAM #2 MEETING On June 5, 2020 the Project Visioning Team virtually met for its second meeting. The presentation included information from the first PVT Meeting, a recap of the public input received, and preliminary recommendations for street improvements. Overall, the improvements were well-received by the PVT. The presentation was sent to all members after the meeting and they were given two weeks to provide comments or concerns regarding the recommendations. All comments have been addressed. Page 1 of 7 CITY OF CLEARWATER FT HARRISON AVE COMPLETE STREETS STUDY PROJECT VISIONING GROUP MEETING #2 Friday, June 5th, 2020 I. ATTENDEES Name Organization Mark Suarez HDR Steve Schukraft HDR Mackenzie Bland HDR Lauren Matzke City of Clearwater, Planning & Development Gina Clayton City of Clearwater, Planning & Development Denise Sanderson City of Clearwater, Economic Development & Housing Chuck Lane City of Clearwater, Economic Development & Housing Michael Lavery City of Clearwater, Parks & Recreation Jesse Rhoades City of Clearwater, Traffic Operations Bryant Johnson City of Clearwater, Solid Waste Amanda Thompson City of Clearwater, CRA Alicia Paranillo City of Largo Rick Allison Town of Belleair Joseph Camera PCSB Safety and Transportation Karen Cunningham Resident Amanda Payne Amplify Clearwater Janelle Branch The Ring F. Bowling Clearwater Brewing Company Heather Sobush PSTA Gloria Lepic-Corridan PSTA Joan Rice Pinellas County Lisa Mansell Church of Scientology David Lillesand Downtown Neighborhood Association II. SUMMARY  Mark Suarez (HDR) and Mackenzie Bland (HDR) gave presentation (see Section V) o Questions were submitted in the Webex Chat Box and answered throughout the presentation. Breaks in the presentation were included to allow for PVT members to ask questions  Chat Box Conversation / Questions Page 2 of 7 o Gloria Lepic-Corridan (PSTA) asked do we have a way of looking at the people who might be fighting turning Ft. Harrison into a more complete street? (slides 17 – 20).  Mark Suarez (HDR) answered that this is an inexact science and we had people answer the survey in a way that is not in line with Complete Streets, but we are giving public engagement opportunities for anyone against the improvements.  Gloria Lepic-Corridan (PSTA) said that answered her question and she just wants to make sure the improvements happen. o Heather Sobush (PSTA) said it might be interesting to see what the breakdown was for the more general Cleveland Street outreach versus the planners in the room (slides 17 – 20).  Mark Suarez (HDR) clarifies that the outreach was not specifically for Cleveland St. It was to attend the Blast Friday event which is on Cleveland St and Ft. Harrison Ave. o Mackenzie Bland (HDR) answered chat box questions that the speed limit for the entire corridor is 30 mph. o Joan Rice (Pinellas County)) commented that bike parking in front of businesses is the way to go. Riders feel they have priority being close to their destination, not an afterthought and can keep an eye on their bicycle. She liked the painting on the pavement at the bike racks as well (slide 25). o Karen Cunningham (resident) said there were good ideas here. From a resident’s perspective, please mention the use of signage, for example to direct to the trail and to downtown, etc. and also safety signage (slides 23 – 28).  Mark Suarez (HDR) agrees that signage can be important to know where you especially when combined with the design strategies. o Karen Cunningham (resident) commented that with the mention of bus shelters and placemaking this is an opportunity to tie the entire city to the downtown. She suggested an artistic, unique design for Clearwater shelters, cost subsidized by the city (slides 23 – 28). o Joan Rice (Pinellas County) commented that a shorter distance for pedestrians to be in the roadway is good (slides 23 – 28). o Joan Rice (Pinellas County) said that where it is recommened not to move the curb, sometimes it is more difficult not to dig down and remove the asphalt. The Page 3 of 7 pipes below may need to be replaced and moving the curb might be beneficial. When you do remove a piece of asphalt you need to dig down and remove the lime rock down below so that the plants can grow (slide 36).  Mark Suarez (HDR) agreed that those decisions can evolve during final design. o Lauren Matzke (City of Clearwater) added that the City has budgeted for the next steps for this project and that hopefully the City would be able to do the improvements comprehensively. o Bryant Johnson (City of Clearwater) asked where the delivery trucks will park to unload if the center lane / space is eliminated (slide 40).  Mark Suarex (HDR) clarified that the loading zone would be moved to the western side of the road as a flexible parking / loading zone to take the delivery trucks out of the middle of the roadway. o Joan Rice (Pinellas County) agreed that more room is needed for pedestrians at the hotel (slide 40). o David Lillesand (Downtown Neighborhood Association) agreed that a loading zone for hotel guests is needed by the hotel (slide 40). o Joan Rice (Pinellas County) commented that a different color for the loading zone may be needed so motorists don’t think it is a through lane (slide 40).  Mark Suarez (HDR) clarified that there would be a bulb-out at the intersection so that cars cannot drive straight through the loading zone. o Bryant Johnson (City of Clearwater) commented to please keep in mind as you narrow and eliminate lanes, that garbage trucks will be servicing containers all along the streets. Without passing lanes all traffic will get ‘stuck’ behind those trucks (slide 42).  Mackenzie Bland (HDR) answered the comment, clarifying that the center turn lane is not meant to be a passing lane and it can be more dangerous when used as one. III. NEXT STEPS  Send presentation to PVT for final comments  Present to City Council Page 4 of 7 IV. SUMMARY OF COMMENTS FROM PVT REVIEW Commenter Representing Comments Responses 1 Richard "Rick" Perez, AICP, MPA, FRA-RP City of Largo At the staff level, we are supportive of the ped crossing and refuge south of Belleair Rd. The location of the crossing will facilitate safe crossing where the Alta Belleair Apartment project, on the west side of Ft. Harrison, will include a connection to the Pinellas Trail that generally aligns with Belleair Rd. You can download the approved site plan here: https://content.largo.com/s/SsRJrcLN6ce4cYN (password: Alta 1 Site Plan)(expiration date: 2020-06-20) Please clarify if the segment of roadway north of our city limits in Clearwater or the County's jurisdiction? If it is the County's, are they indicating whether they support and will implement the road diet and other improvements on their portion of the roadway? Finally, the Clearwater Largo Rd Community Development District encompasses the area in the City that is adjacent to this project. The City is working towards updating our Clearwater Largo Rd Community Development Plan in the next 2 years and will likely consider the feasibility of similar roadway treatments and configuration along our portion of CL Rd at that time. There seem to be no issues with the concept proposed. The site plan can be shared with engineering since the Belleair intersection is joint jurisdiction. 2 Greg Stading BayCare Facilities Services, West Region We (Morton Plant Hospital) have a significant concern regarding the proposed plan to eliminate the center turn lane on Ft. Harrison in Segment 2. Our concern is ambulances, fire trucks, and other emergency response vehicles presently use the center turn lane to circumvent traffic in the normal drive lanes. What is your plan for those emergency response vehicles? Have you specifically discussed this with Sunstar, the fire department and the police department? Please feel free The elimination of the Segment 2 center turn lane is only recommended at pedestrian crossings (for a pedestrian refuge). The presence of dirveways and side streets in the corridor should allow for cars to clear the way for emergency vehicles in the Page 5 of 7 to contact me for further follow-up and discussion. Thank you. chance that a turn lane is removed. 3 Lisa Mansell Church of Scientology - Public Affairs Director Final comments were provide separately. Responses being developed separately. 4 Bryant Johnson City of Clearwater My only concerns are ensuring access to residential or commercial trash receptacles along Fort Harrison as well as unimpeded access to sidewalk trash receptacles. If the road is narrowed then we are conceding that that service will impede traffic that has already been reduced. No additional comments other than those. Trash pickup is an occasional occurrence that could potentially be mitigated with revised routing and scheduling of pick-ups for off peak time. 5 Amanda Thompson Clearwater CRA - Director I'm good. I think there are several good options for each segment and I'd love to have any of these improvements. No changes. 6 Karen Cunningham Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Thanks for asking, Lauren. I asked a question about signage. I think that people who set up the projects just assume others, especially walkers, know more than they actually do. Simple signs. Showing things like the Pinellas Trail connection, and safety reminders that, for example, remind drivers and bicyclists that there are areas that may be dangerous for crossings, etc, could help keep people safe and oriented. Recommendations include improved wayfinding and pavement markings. Page 6 of 7 7 David Lillesand Lillesand & Associates, P.A. I did not have any problem opening the files and did so, and actually reviewed them. I just didn’t have anything different to add. I thought the whole presentation and the summary was extremely well done. . . No changes. 8 Michael Lavery Clearwater Parks & Rec Hi Lauren, thanks for checking in. I do not have any comments beyond what was discussed in the meeting. No changes. 9 Autumn Westermann Pinellas Public Schools I was able to open the attachments and I don’t have any concerns. Thanks so much for making sure! No changes. 10 Joan Rice Pinellas County No additional comments No changes. 11 Jesse Rhoades Clearwater Engineering Traffic Operations No additional comments No changes. 12 Roger T. Johnson, P.E. Clearwater Stormwater In reviewing the preliminary concepts developed, I do not have objections to the intent, or ideas presented. Please note, the concepts presented will have significant impacts on the roadway alignment and infrastructure presently below grade. It is important to note this as we move forward and ensure we provide a clear picture of what the total impacts and costs will be when presented to council for support. After further discussions, the study will identify costs based on strategies to avoid major odrainage impacts.. Page 7 of 7 V. PRESENTATION Complete Streets StudyProject Recap and Preliminary ConceptsFT. HARRISON AVENUE PROJECT RECAPPUBLIC INVOLVEMENTPRELIMINARY CONCEPTS2NEXT STEPS PROJECT RECAP3 4PROJECT PURPOSE4Develop concepts to advance Clearwater’smobility, safety, and placemakingobjectivesthrough a complete streets approachDefineachievable improvementsfor the corridorDefinepriority improvement projectsto move forwardinto engineering and designSCHEDULE•TheForward Pinellas Complete Streets Programprovidesfunding for the planning and construction of complete streetsprojects•The City was awarded a grant of $50,000 for this projectJUN ‘20 VISIONING TEAM MEETING & WALKSHOPWEDNESDAYNov 13th, 201930ATTENDEES•The Project Visioning Team (PVT) is made up of business owners, residents, local agencies, andcity staff who have an interest in the corridor•The consultant presented on the project background and potential design strategies•The group walked through different spots along the corridor to observe existing conditions andbrainstorm ideas5•KEY OBSERVATIONS & COMMENTS•Maintenance of sidewalks•Back of curb sidewalks feel dangerous•Identity for Ft. Harrison PROJECT OVERVIEW6BELLEAIR RDBELLEVIEW BLVDCOURTSTDREWSTN MYRTLEAVESTUDY LIMITSLAKEVIEWRDCHESTNUTSTJEFFORDS STFT HARRISON AVELIMITS: Ft. Harrison Avenue from Belleair Rd to N Myrtle Ave3.2MILESCITY OF CLEARWATERJURISDICTIONCONNECTEDNESS TO KEY DESTINATIONS•CLEARWATER BEACH•SEMINOLE BOAT RAMP•PARK ST TRANSIT CENTER•MORTON PLANT HOSPITAL•CITY OF LARGO•CITY OF DUNEDIN•US ALT-19 & US 19•SR 6019AFAIRMONT STSEMINOLE STCOUNTY COURTHOUSEMAIN LIBRARYBELLEAIRCOUNTRY CLUBMORTON PLANT HOSPITALSEMINOLE BOAT RAMPCOACHMAN PARKGULF TO BAY BLVDCITY MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDINGPUBLIX SUPER MARKET 7WHAT IS A COMPLETE STREET?7PLACEMAKINGCOMPLETE STREETSREALLOCATESTREETSPACE TO BEDESIGNEDFORANDOPERATEDBYEVERYONEINCLUDING VEHICLES, TRANSIT, PEDESTRIANS, & CYCLISTS OFALLAGES &ABILITIESSAFETY•Good bicycle & pedestrian infrastructure issafer for all users•Crash & injury risk can be reduced withslower speeds•Walking & biking for short trips (under 1 mile)improves personal health & the environmentMOBILITY•Approximately 2 out of every 5 PinellasCounty residents are under the age of 18 orover the age of 65HEALTH•Slower & fewer vehicles create a more vibrant,livable place•Community is fostered in outside spaces 8COMPLETE STREETS FOR CLEARWATERIMPLEMENTATION PLAN8“PROVIDE ANETWORKOF STREETS ANDBALANCEDTRANSPORTATION OPTIONS THAT ARESAFERAND MOREEFFICIENTFOREVERYONE....”GUIDING PRINCIPLES•SAFE, COMFORTABLE TRAVEL•TRANSPORTATIONACCESSIBILITY•MULTIMODAL MOBILITY•CONNECTEDAND INVITING•ECONOMIC VITALITYAND PLACEMAKING•COMMUNITY HEALTH•SOCIALEQUITYAND INVESTMENT•COMMUNITY CHARACTERAND CONTEXT SENSITIVITY•ENVIRONMENTALPROTECTIONAND SUSTAINABILITY•TECHNOLOGYIMPROVE SAFETY FOR ALL MODESSUPPORT LOCAL BUSINESSES AND COMMUNITYIMPROVE PERSONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTHSERVE RESIDENTS WITHOUT VEHICLE ACCESS FDOT,MAY 2019Project goalsoImprove traffic operations on USAlt-19ImportanceoCorridor serves as alternative N-S corridor to Ft HarrisonAveoImproved operations on corridor will allow for more successfultraffic calming and safety measures on Ft HarrisonAveProposed roundabout to relieve traffic congestion forvehicles going from northbound Ft Harrison Ave ontonorthboundAlt-19PREVIOUS STUDIES / PLANS US ALT-19 CORRIDOR STUDYFAIRMONT ST ROUNDABOUT9N MYRTLE AVE19AMINNESOTA DRFAIRMONT STAPACHE TRAILMOHAWK STPLEASANT ST PREVIOUS STUDIES / PLANS COMPLETE DREW STREET DOWNTOWN SEGMENTFORWARD PINELLAS,OCTOBER 2019Project goalsoImprove safety, accessibility, and connectivity with land usesoSupport existing businesses and future growthoPromote active living with improved access to trailsImprovements:oBike infrastructureoRoad diet from four lanes to two lanesoAdditional parkingoImproved streetscape10 CITY OF CLEARWATER,JANUARY 2016Project GoalsoRedevelopment plan for area surrounding the Seminole BoatRampOn Ft HarrisonAveoWider sidewalksoActivated corners as social areasoEnhanced interface between pedestrian zone and building usesoAvoid driveway conflicts with pedestriansoSingle-story retailoMid-rise residentialFt HarrisonAve & Seminole StoGateway feature11PREVIOUS STUDIES & PLANS NORTH MARINA AREA MASTER PLANFT HARRISON AVE CONCEPT SEGMENT CHARACTERISTICSBELLEAIR RDBELLEVIEW BLVDCOURTSTDREWSTN MYRTLEAVESEGMENT 1BSEGMENT 2LAKEVIEWRDCHESTNUTSTJEFFORDS ST1219ASegment 1ABelleair Rd to Belleview BlvdTypical Section4LANE UNDIVIDED100’Typical Right-of-Way2Segment 1BBelleview Blvd to Chestnut StTypical SectionLANES WITH TWLTL*60’Typical Right-of-WaySegment 2 Chestnut St to Drew St2Typical SectionLANES WITH TWLTL*55 – 70’Typical Right-of-WaySegment 3 Drew St to N Myrtle Ave 2Typical SectionLANES WITH TWLTL*55 – 60’Typical Right-of-Way*Two Way Left Turn Lane DATA & STATISTICSSEGMENT CHARACTERISTICS13MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOMEPOPULATION BELOW POVERTY LEVELMINORITY POPULATIONHOUSEHOLDS WITH NO VEHICLESPOPULATION UNDER 18POPULATION OVER 65CORRIDOR*$24K24%26%22%16%21%CITY$45K16%20%12%19%21%COUNTY$47K14%26%9%17%24%*Includes the area within a ¼ mile walkshed of the Project corridor DEFINING SUCCESSBELLEAIR RDCOURTSTDREWSTN MYRTLEAVESEGMENT 1BDOWNTOWN TRANSITIONSEGMENT 2DOWNTOWN CORELAKEVIEWRDCHESTNUTSTJEFFORDS ST14Segment 1•Improve multimodal connections across corridor & into downtown•Create agatewayinto the City & downtownSegment 2•Use streetspace to create a welcoming, livable, & economically vibrantdowntownSegment 3•Beautifythe streetspace to attract investment and developmentto achieve future land use visionBELLEVIEW BLVD PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT15 82What word describes your future vision for Ft. Harrison Ave?BLAST FRIDAYPUBLIC WORKSHOP16Friday Feb 28thFROM 5 PM TO 10 PM300+PEOPLE REACHEDAT BLAST FRIDAY•Outreach before event included social media posts,postcard mailers, and an email to stakeholders•Handed pamphlets to people attending event•Spoke with attendees and increased awareness ofthe project•Encouraged people to take the MetroQuest surveySocial MediaOUTREACH INCLUDED POSTS TO FACEBOOK & NEXTDOOR600POSTCARDS MAILED OVERVIEWPUBLIC INPUT SURVEY17Bicycle/Skateboard/Scooter, 12%Car, 56%Freight/Delivery Truck, 1%I dont, 1%Other, 1%Transit, 1%Walk, 28%Which way(s) do you travel on Ft. Harrison?131TOTAL PARTICIPANTS3 weeksTO RESPOND5 minTO COMPLETEAge Distribution25 and under, 1%26 to 40, 22% 41 to 60, 42%61 to 80, 35%0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%How did you hear about this survey?Email, 43% Facebook, 22%From a Friend, 3%NextDoor, 12%Other, 20%0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% TRADEOFFSPUBLIC INPUT SURVEY18Example Screen55%VisionSafety & livability for all usersTravel Speed74%Lower travel speedsRoad DietReallocate lanes for multiple modes of travel65%Approach59%Higher cost per project and fewer projectsPlacemaking67%“Drive To” Ft. Harrison AveRespondents Preferred IMPRESSIONSPUBLIC INPUT SURVEY19Example ScreenHighest rated photos:Painted CrosswalkSegment 3Enhanced IntersectionSegment 2Midblock CrossingSegment 1B3.73.33.6Lowest rated photos:Bus StopSegment 1ADriveway ConflictsSegment 2Street CharacterSegment 1A2.32.42.3 PREFERENCESPUBLIC INPUT SURVEYExample ScreenCROSSING REFUGE ISLANDLANDSCAPED ISLANDSDesign features ranked most often:Design features ranked highest:12ON-STREET PARKINGCROSSING REFUGE ISLAND21(Respondents ranked their top 4 features from 8 choices)(Respondents ranked their top 4 features from 8 choices)20 MOVING FORWARD21 PRELIMINARY CONCEPTS22 DESIGN STRATEGIES OVERVIEWCROSSING REFUGE ISLANDPARKLETON-STREET PARKINGLANDSCAPED ISLANDSINTERSECTION BULB-OUTMIDBLOCK BULB-OUTENHANCED INTERSECTION TREATMENTSBICYCLE FACILITY23Each design strategy provides their own unique benefits to enhancing a street . . . DESIGN STRATEGIES OVERVIEW24Slower & Safer StreetsAesthetic ImprovementsTransportation AccessibilitySupport Local BusinessesLivability ImprovementsCROSSING REFUGE ISLANDPARKLETON-STREET PARKINGLANDSCAPED ISLANDSINTERSECTION BULB-OUTMIDBLOCK BULB-OUTENHANCEDINTERSECTION TREATMENTSBICYCLE FACILITY. . . and in combination, these strategies work together to provide the following benefits: •Calm traffic and beautify the street•Demonstration project for future raised intersection•Implement with other features, such as bulb-outsADDITIONAL COMPLETE STREETS STRATEGIESPAINTED INTERSECTIONSCentral Ave & 5thSt in St. Petersburg, FLENHANCED & ACCESSIBLE BUS STOPSBIKE PARKINGLIGHTING•Encourage and accommodate non-vehicle travel•Increase street activity and access to businesses•Create a sense of placeGENERAL STRATEGIESSEATING25 The Florida Design Manual (FDM), published by the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) recognizes and recommends emphasizing the existing grid of streetswith marked crosswalks to slow vehicles and improve the pedestrian experience. •Calm traffic by reinforcing presence of existing grid and pedestrians•Increase pedestrian connectionsOVERALL IMPROVEMENTSSHORT BLOCKSSource: FDOT Design Manual Chapter 202 Marked crosswalks at minor street intersections26 OVERALL IMPROVEMENTS•Create safer crossing conditions for pedestrians•Calm traffic with pedestrian presence and median islandCROSSINGS WITH REFUGE ISLANDS & RRFB SIGNALSImprove existing midblock crossings with RRFBlights and refuge islandsCROSSING REFUGE ISLANDFLASHING (RRFB) CROSSINGS27•Rapid rectangular flashing beacon (RRFB) requires vehicles to stop•Provide opportunity for aesthetic / landscape improvements •Calm vehicle traffic to support mixed traffic of bicycles & vehicles•Connect to existing trails and bikewaysOVERALL IMPROVEMENTSBICYCLE ACCOMODATIONS•Manage driveway access and sidewalk conflicts•Maintain and refurbish damaged sidewalksSIDEWALK CONDITIONSUtilize existing trail network and increase buffer from trafficClose or shorten driveways where possibleCreate a safer street for riders and connect existing facilitiesBuffer sidewalk from street where available right-of-way existsDriveway closure exampleCONNECT TO EXISTING TRAILS & BIKEWAYSMAGNOLIA DR28 PRELIMINARY CONCEPTSBELLEAIR RDCOURT STDREW STN MYRTLE AVESEGMENT 1BDOWNTOWN TRANSITIONSEGMENT 2DOWNTOWN CORELAKEVIEW RDCHESTNUT STJEFFORDS ST29Segment 1AFROM BELLEAIR RD TO BELLEVIEW BLVDSegment 2FROM CHESTNUT ST TO DREW STSegment 3FROM DREW STREET TO N MYRTLE AVE BELLEVIEW BLVDOVERVIEWSegment 1BFROM BELLEVIEW BLVD TO CHESTNUT STCLEVELENAD STSEMINOLE ST 30OVERALL IMPROVEMENTS*See concept plans for detailsROAD DIETReduce from 4 lanes to 3 lanes throughout segmentINTERSECTION BULB-OUTSReduce radii at corners to slow turning traffic, reduce pedestrian crossing distances, and reclaim public spaceLANDSCAPED ISLANDSAdd landscaped islands in center turn lane where turning movements are not neededAdd landscaped islands along eastern side to narrow the road SPECIFIC IMPROVEMENTSPAINTED INTERSECTIONPaint intersection at Belleview Blvd to enhance Pinellas Trail crossing, serve as a gateway into the City, and calm trafficCROSSING REFUGE ISLANDSRefuge islands added in the center turn lane at two proposed crosswalk locationsAdditional crosswalk locations to include refuge islandsBICYCLE FACILITIESImprove connections to existing Pinellas Trail SEGMENT 1A: City GatewayBELLEAIR RDBELLEVIEW BLVDWILDWOOD WAYWOODLAWN STPINELLAS TRAILBELLEAIR COUNTRY CLUBEND SEGMENTBEGIN SEGMENTFuture Trail ConnectionTrail ConnectionEvaluated a road dietfrom Belleair Rd to Belleview BlvdCreated agatewayinto the City & downtownImproved multimodal connections across corridor BELLEAIR RD to BELLEVIEW BLVD 31OVERALL IMPROVEMENTS*See concept plans for detailsROAD DIETReduce from 4 lanes to 3 lanes throughout segmentINTERSECTION BULB-OUTSReduce radii at corners to slow turning traffic, reduce pedestrian crossing distances, and reclaim public spaceLANDSCAPED ISLANDSAdd landscaped islands in center turn lane where turning movements are not neededAdd landscaped islands along eastern side to narrow the road SPECIFIC IMPROVEMENTSPAINTED INTERSECTIONPaint intersection at Belleview Blvd to enhance Pinellas Trail crossing, serve as a gateway into the City, and calm trafficCROSSING REFUGE ISLANDSRefuge islands added in the center turn lane at two proposed crosswalk locationsAdditional crosswalk locations to include refuge islandsBICYCLE FACILITIESImprove connections to existing Pinellas Trail SEGMENT 1A: City GatewayLandscaped Island with Crossing RefugeEXISTING 4 LANESPROPOSED ROAD DIET WITH 3 LANESLandscaped IslandLandscaped IslandMaintain existing curb and gutterNo turn lanesMaintain existing edge of pavementNo separation of opposing trafficBELLEAIR RD to BELLEVIEW BLVD 32SEGMENT 1A: City GatewayROAD DIET CONCEPT FOR SEGMENT 1AFROM BELLEAIR RD TO BELLEVIEW BLVD•Convert 4 lane road into two lanes with intermittent left turn lanes and landscaped islands•Add crossing refuge islands at proposed crosswalks•Landscaped islands on eastern edge buffer sidewalk•Remove one southbound receiving lane at Belleview BlvdLandscaped IslandsLandscaped IslandsMedian Refuge IslandConnection to Pinellas Trail3 Lanes Begins HereIntersection Bulb-OutsIntersection ReconfigurationLOOKING SOUTH ON FT. HARRISON AVE FROM WILDWOOD WAYBELLEAIR RDWOODLAWN STWILDWOOD WAYBELLEVIEW BLVDPINELLAS TRAILBELLEAIR RD to BELLEVIEW BLVD 33SEGMENT 1A: City GatewayCONTINUED CONCEPT FOR PART OF SEGMENT 1BFROM BELLEVIEW BLVD TO LAKEVIEW RD•Replace bike lane with landscaped island to buffer Pinellas Trail•Remove eastbound receiving lane on Lakeview to add crossing refuge island for Pinellas Trail•Add landscaped islands where left turn movements are not needed to calm traffic and improve aesthetics near Pinellas TrailLandscaped IslandsLandscaped Islands to buffer Pinellas TrailMedian Refuge IslandPinellas TrailLOOKING NORTH ON FT. HARRISON AVE FROM PINELLAS TRAILBELLEVIEW BLVDMCLENNAN STE STLAKEVIEW RDPinellas TrailIntersection ReconfigurationIntersection ReconfigurationFT HARRISON AVEBELLEAIR RD to BELLEVIEW BLVD 34SEGMENT 1A: City GatewayROAD DIET CONCEPT FOR SEGMENT 1ABELLEVIEW BLVD INTERSECTION•Reconfigure to maintain 3 lanes on each side of the intersection•Intersection bulb-outs and landscaped islands to create a smaller intersectionLandscaped IslandsLandscaped IslandsPinellas Trail CrossingConvert Dual Thru/Left to Left OnlyIntersection Bulb-OutsBELLEVIEW BLVDLAKEVIEW RDRemove Extra Thru LaneFT HARRISON AVEPINELLAS TRAILROAD DIET CONCEPT FOR SEGMENT 1ALAKEVIEW RD INTERSECTION•Remove thru lane on eastbound Lakeview Rd•Use former thru lane for a median refuge island for the Pinellas TrailBELLEAIR RD to BELLEVIEW BLVD 35SEGMENT 1A: City GatewayMETHODOLOGYTraffic volume & operational analysis for Segment 1A and Belleview BlvdUtilized 1% per year growth rate through 2040Measures of Effectiveness (MOEs)oIntersection and approach delay per vehicleoApproach volume to capacity ratioso50thpercentile queue lengthsRESULTSProposed Segment 1A corridor Level of Service (LOS) decreases from LOS C to LOS D (PM peak)Proposed Belleview Blvd intersection travel time increase (average of all approaches in PM peak):o2020 3 seconds or lesso2040 7 seconds or lessBELLEAIR RD to BELLEVIEW BLVD BELLEVIEW BLVDBELLEAIR COUNTRY CLUBLAKEVIEW RDCHESTNUT STCORBETT STPINELLAS STJEFFORDS STMAGNOLIA DRDRUID RDEND SEGMENTBEGIN SEGMENT36SEGMENT 1B: Downtown TransitionOVERALL IMPROVEMENTS*See concept plans for detailsINTERSECTION BULB-OUTSReduce radii at corners to slow turning traffic, reduce pedestrian crossing distances, and reclaim public spaceLANDSCAPED ISLANDSAdd landscaped islands in center turn lane where turning movements are not needed and in unbuffered bike lanesAdd landscaped islands along eastern side to in current bike lane to buffer Pinellas TrailBICYCLE FACILITIESImprove connections to Pinellas Trail and other bikewaysRemove unbuffered bike lanes and improve off-street facilitiesMARKED CROSSWALKSAdd marked crosswalks at minor intersections to reinforce grid, improve pedestrian connections, and calm trafficSPECIFIC IMPROVEMENTSPAINTED INTERSECTIONIntersection at Lakeview Rd painted to enhance Pinellas Trail crossing, serve as a gateway into the City, and calm trafficCROSSING REFUGE ISLANDSAdd refuge islands in center turn lane at midblock crossingsEvaluated a road dietfrom Belleair Rd to Belleview BlvdCreated agatewayinto the City & downtownImproved multimodal connections across corridor BELLEVIEW BLVD to CHESTNUT ST PROPOSED 3 LANES WITH IMPROVEMENTS37SEGMENT 1B: Downtown TransitionOVERALL IMPROVEMENTS*See concept plans for detailsINTERSECTION BULB-OUTSReduce radii at corners to slow turning traffic, reduce pedestrian crossing distances, and reclaim public spaceLANDSCAPED ISLANDSAdd landscaped islands in center turn lane where turning movements are not needed and in unbuffered bike lanesAdd landscaped islands along eastern side to in current bike lane to buffer Pinellas TrailBICYCLE FACILITIESImprove connections to Pinellas Trail and other bikewaysRemove unbuffered bike lanes and improve off-street facilitiesMARKED CROSSWALKSAdd marked crosswalks at minor intersections to reinforce grid, improve pedestrian connections, and calm trafficSPECIFIC IMPROVEMENTSPAINTED INTERSECTIONIntersection at Lakeview Rd painted to enhance Pinellas Trail crossing, serve as a gateway into the City, and calm trafficCROSSING REFUGE ISLANDSAdd refuge islands in center turn lane at midblock crossingsContinuous TWLTL Crosswalk with RRFB SignalLandscaped IslandLandscaped IslandNew curb and gutterEXISTING 3 LANESUnbuffered and narrow bike laneBELLEVIEW BLVD to CHESTNUT STPinellas Trail CHESTNUT STEND SEGMENTBEGIN SEGMENTCOURT STFRANKLIN STPIERCE STPARK STCLEVELAND STDREW STHENDRICKS STCOACHMAN PARK38SEGMENT 2: Downtown CoreOVERALL IMPROVEMENTSINTERSECTION BULB-OUTSReduce radius at corners to slow turning traffic, reduce pedestrian crossing distances, and reclaim public spaceBICYCLE FACILITIESImprove connections to Pinellas Trail & other bikewaysCalm traffic to allow street to serve bicycle connectionsSPECIFIC IMPROVEMENTSON-STREET PARKING & PARKLETSShorten left turn lanes to create space for on-street parking, parklets, & a wider sidewalkCROSSING REFUGE ISLANDSRefuge islands added in the center turn lane at existing crosswalk locationsRRFBsAdd rapid rectangular flashing beacon (RRFB) at existing crossings for increased pedestrian safety and traffic calmingPAINTED INTERSECTIONIntersection at Belleview Rd painted to enhance Pinellas Trail crossing, serve as a gateway into the City, and calm trafficUse streetspace to create a welcoming, livable, & economically vibrant downtownProvide opportunities for landscaping & beautificationIncrease & improve public space and parking / loading accessCHESTNUT ST to DREW ST ALTERNATIVE WITH NO SB TURN LANES, WIDER SIDEWALK, & OTHER IMPRVEMENTS(at Cleveland St looking north)EXISTING 2 LANES WITH EXTRA LONG TURN LANE(at Cleveland St looking north)39SEGMENT 2: Downtown CoreOVERALL IMPROVEMENTSINTERSECTION BULB-OUTSReduce radius at corners to slow turning traffic, reduce pedestrian crossing distances, and reclaim public spaceBICYCLE FACILITIESImprove connections to Pinellas Trail & other bikewaysCalm traffic to allow street to serve bicycle connectionsSPECIFIC IMPROVEMENTSON-STREET PARKING & PARKLETSShorten left turn lanes to create space for on-street parking, parklets, & a wider sidewalkCROSSING REFUGE ISLANDSRefuge islands added in the center turn lane at existing crosswalk locationsRRFBsAdd rapid rectangular flashing beacon (RRFB) at existing crossings for increased pedestrian safety and traffic calmingPAINTED INTERSECTIONIntersection at Belleview Rd painted to enhance Pinellas Trail crossing, serve as a gateway into the City, and calm trafficExisting turn laneNarrow sidewalkOn-Street Parking ParkletOpportunitiesSidewalk widenedNew Pedestrian SpaceCHESTNUT ST to DREW ST 40SEGMENT 2: Downtown CoreALTERNATIVE CONCEPT FOR SEGMENT 2FROM COURT ST TO PIERCE ST•Remove center turn lane to widen western sidewalk and add on-street parking and/or a curbside loading zone•New zone can decrease pedestrian conflicts and removes freight and delivery vehicles from center turn laneLOOKING SOUTH ON FT. HARRISON AVE FROM PIERCE STLandscaped IslandsLandscaped IslandsLandscaped IslandsIntersection Bulb-OutsIntersection Bulb-OutsOn-Street ParkingOn-Street Parking / Loading ZoneWidened SidewalkFRANKLIN STPARK STCHESTNUT ST to DREW ST DREW STEND SEGMENTBEGIN SEGMENTJONES STELDRIDGE STSEMINOLE STCEDAR STN MYRTLE AVE19ANICHOLSON STOVERALL IMPROVEMENTSINTERSECTION BULB-OUTSReduce radius at corners to slow turning traffic, reduce pedestrian crossing distances, and reclaim public spaceMARKED CROSSWALKSAdd marked crosswalks at minor intersections to reinforce grid, improve pedestrian connections, and calm trafficSPECIFIC IMPROVEMENTSMIDBLOCK BULB-OUTSAdd midblock bulb-outs while maintaining current curb and gutter to narrow the roadway and create a “chicaning” movementON-STREET PARKINGAdd on-street parking where needed within midblock bulb-outsPAINTED INTERSECTIONPaint intersection at Seminole St to calm traffic and create gateway into Downtown41SEGMENT 3: North MarinaBeautifiedthe streetscape to attract investment and developmentto achieve future land use visionProvided opportunities for landscaping & beautificationNarrowed lanes for traffic calmingDREW ST to N MYRTLE AVE PROPOSED 2 LANES WITH BULB-OUTSEXISTING 3 LANESOVERALL IMPROVEMENTSINTERSECTION BULB-OUTSReduce radius at corners to slow turning traffic, reduce pedestrian crossing distances, and reclaim public spaceMARKED CROSSWALKSAdd marked crosswalks at minor intersections to reinforce grid, improve pedestrian connections, and calm trafficSPECIFIC IMPROVEMENTSMIDBLOCK BULB-OUTSAdd midblock bulb-outs while maintaining current curb and gutter to narrow the roadway and create a “chicaning” movementON-STREET PARKINGAdd on-street parking where needed within midblock bulb-outsPAINTED INTERSECTIONPaint intersection at Seminole St to calm traffic and create gateway into Downtown42SEGMENT 3: North MarinaOn-Street Parking in some bulb-outsWide lanes and underutilized TWLTLMidblock Bulb-Out to create chicaning,Maintain Existing Curb and GutterMaintain Existing Curb and GutterNarrow sidewalk with little or no bufferDREW ST to N MYRTLE AVE NEXT STEPS43 NEXT STEPS44SELECT & REFINE PREFERRED IMPROVEMENTSPLANNING LEVEL COSTSIDENTIFY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN & PRIORITY PROJECTSPRESENT TO CITY COUNCIL © 2014 HDR Architecture, Inc., all rights reserved.© 2014 HDR Architecture, Inc., all rights reserved.© 2014 HDR Architecture, Inc., all rights reserved.© 2014 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved.© 2014 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved.© 2014 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved.© 2014 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved. 132 APPENDIX C: TRAFFIC MEMORANDUM The traffic memorandum was completed to analyze the traffic volumes and operations of Segment 1A from Belleair Road to Belleview Boulevard before and after the proposed road diet. Utilizing a 1% growth rate through 2040, the proposed design for Segment 1A yielded a Level of Service decrease for LOS C to LOS D during the PM peak. The travel time change for the proposed Belleview Boulevard intersection during the PM peak increased from three seconds in 2020 to seven seconds in 2040. The conservative growth rate and acceptable change in travel time indicates that the proposed road diet is feasible. Traffic Analysis Memorandum Date: Friday, April 17, 2020 Project: Ft Harrison Complete Streets Study To: Lauren Matzke, AICP, Diego Guevara (City of Clearwater) From: Mark Suarez, P.E., Matthew Wiesenfeld, P.E., Tyler Valila, E.I. Subject: Ft Harrison Complete Streets Study Traffic Analysis Memorandum Attachments: Growth Rate Calculations, Synchro Outputs, City of Clearwater Provided Data For the City of Clearwater’s Ft Harrison Complete Streets Study, HDR performed traffic volume and operational analysis for a southern segment of Ft Harrison Avenue and the associated intersections of Belleair Road and Belleview Boulevard. It was found that the proposed lane elimination produced no significant traffic impacts. Background Much of the existing Ft Harrison Avenue is comprised of a three lane section (a northbound, southbound, and two way continuous left turn lane). For a short segment of the study corridor, between Belleair Road and Belleview Boulevard, the three lane section expands to an undivided four lane section with two northbound and two southbound travel lanes. The overall study area, with the traffic analysis portion outlined, is shown in the image below including the intersections: No. 1 - Ft Harrison Avenue at Belleair Road and No.2 - Ft Harrison Avenue at Belleview Boulevard. The analysis is based on both collected traffic volumes and existing county and state traffic data. Existing roadway geometry and field conditions were observed and documented for the study. Segment level and intersection specific data was compared and balanced to establish existing conditions and project future demand. 1 2 Traffic Volume Analysis Two intersections were analyzed to determine intersection peak hours and volumes based on city provided data. A growth rate was also determined to calculate the future volumes. Intersection Approach Data Analysis A traffic data review was conducted based on City of Clearwater provided roadway volume counts at each of the intersection approaches. The data, included in the Attachment, includes 72-hour traffic machine counts (approach volumes at 15-minute and 60-minute increments) at all approaches to the Ft Harrison Avenue at Belleview Boulevard intersection, and the Ft Harrison Avenue at Belleair Road intersection. The results are displayed in Table 1 and the AM and PM peak hours are highlighted in bold text. Values represent a three day average per hour per approach. Table 1: Roadway Counts for Ft Harrison Ave at Belleair Rd and Belleview Blvd (2019) Ft Harrison at Belleair Rd Ft Harrison at Belleview Blvd Time NB SB WB ALL EB WB NB SB ALL 00:00 17 23 24 64 3 2 21 44 70 01:00 20 17 8 45 3 0 21 29 53 02:00 11 12 9 32 3 1 11 18 33 03:00 14 8 11 33 5 0 21 16 42 04:00 27 13 25 65 15 0 48 24 87 05:00 90 37 101 228 43 2 195 54 294 06:00 300 140 273 713 144 10 480 223 857 07:00 494 283 461 1,238 329 14 730 563 1,636 08:00 500 282 442 1,224 323 17 671 616 1,627 09:00 437 459 374 1,270 315 18 588 645 1,566 10:00 399 525 333 1,257 277 15 525 723 1,540 11:00 381 542 322 1,245 282 22 494 780 1,578 12:00 443 568 361 1,372 303 13 584 757 1,657 13:00 428 534 367 1,329 307 17 560 707 1,591 14:00 439 625 353 1,417 315 14 535 848 1,712 15:00 419 674 331 1,424 319 15 541 965 1,840 16:00 411 773 264 1,448 302 22 507 1,063 1,894 17:00 407 691 252 1,350 264 13 479 934 1,690 18:00 317 410 231 958 165 7 392 583 1,147 19:00 201 352 140 693 136 5 222 478 841 20:00 150 221 94 465 78 5 161 319 563 21:00 96 158 78 332 58 5 115 229 407 22:00 79 120 62 261 35 3 99 174 311 23:00 41 95 31 167 18 1 47 120 186 TOTAL 6,121 7,562 4,947 18,630 4,042 221 8,047 10,912 23,222 Based on the historical machine count data, existing year (2020) design hour AM and PM peak hours were determined for both study intersections. For both intersections, the AM peak is 7 to 8 AM and the PM peak is 4 to 5 PM. These peak times were used to determine count times for intersection turning movement counts (TMCs). The TMCs were then collected from 7 AM to 9 AM, 10:45 AM to 12:45 PM, and 3:45 PM to 5:45 PM on Thursday, January 16th and seasonally adjusted to convert them to turning movement volumes (TMVs). These 2020 TMCs had a 2018 peak season factor (SF) applied to convert them into TMV’s. 2018 was the most recently available data from FDOT for the aforementioned factors. Intersection Volume Development Future volumes were calculated by applying a study area wide linear growth rate to the Existing Year TMVs at both study intersections. The applied growth rate was determined based on historic traffic data, population estimates, and surrounding roadway projects. Table 3 shows the proposed future projects that were researched to determine any potential impact to traffic patterns within the study areas. Population forecasts were also researched and are documented in Table 4 and Table 5. Historic AADT data is presented in Table 6, along with a recommended annual growth rate for the intersection and corridor. Growth rate calculations using the Historic AADT data is provided in the Attachment. A growth rate of 1 % per year was then applied for the future year (2040) AM and PM design hour TMV’s. Once future volumes were determined, the Existing, Build, and No-Build intersections were created in Synchro, a traffic operational analysis software. Synchro outputs follow HCM 6th Edition where applicable. All analysis procedures follow the 2014 Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Traffic Analysis Handbook. The TMVs used for intersection operations analysis in 2020 and 2040 are provided in Table 2. Table 2 – Turning Movement Volumes for Intersection Operations Analysis EXISTING YEAR 2020 AM PEAK PM PEAK DESIGN YEAR 2040 Table 3– Future Projects In or Near Study Area Source Limits Project Type Reference Impact to Study Corridor Growth Rate? FDOT Tampa Bay Myrtle Ave from Chestnut St to Mohawk St Repaving Project Reference None Anticipated Table 4 – BEBR Pinellas County Population Estimates and Annual Growth Rates Estimate 2018 Population Estimate 2020 Population Projection 2040 Population Projection Annual Growth Rate (2018 to 2020) Annual Growth Rate (2020 to 2040) Low 970,532 953,700 947,600 -0.87%-0.03% Medium 983,900 1,063,500 0.69% 0.40% High 1,012,700 1,200,600 2.17% 0.93% Table 5 – Pinellas County Population Estimates and Annual Growth Rates (Pinellas County Population Projection 2016-2021) 2016 Population Estimate 2021 Population Projection Annual Growth Rate (2016 to 2021) 960,730 1,036,369 1.57 % Table 6 – Annual Growth Rates Summary Scope Task # Major Road Segment Historic AADT Summary From To Station # 2018 AADT Trend Annual Growth Rate (2018 to 2040) Recommended Annual Growth Rate 4.2 Ft Harrison Drew Street Myrtle Avenue 155048 8,900 -3.32 % 1 % 4.2 Clearwater-Largo Rd West Bay Drive Wyatt Street 159176 22,000 1.56 % 4.2 Lakeview Road Ft Harrison S MLK Jr Ave 159218 8,500 1.71 % 4.2 Ft Harrison At Jasmin Way 14,862 AADT* N/A *Provided by City of Clearwater Traffic Operations Analysis A traffic operational analysis was conducted for the intersection of Ft Harrison Avenue at Belleview Boulevard and the corridor of Ft Harrison Avenue from Belleair Road to Belleview Boulevard. Intersection Analysis At the intersection Ft Harrison Avenue at Belleview Boulevard, the TMVs were used to determine the traffic operations for the existing lane configure and the proposed lane configuration in 2020 and 2040. The proposed project would repurpose the southbound left-through lane to an exclusive left turn lanes with median islands. Synchro, using HCM 6th Edition methodology is used to evaluate each scenario with the following Measures of Effectiveness (MOEs): Intersection and approach delay per vehicle Approach Volume to Capacity ratios 50th percentile queue lengths The traffic operations analysis shows that at the intersection of Ft Harrison Avenue at Belleview Boulevard, the proposed geometric change would have a nominal impact on intersection performance. If the proposed configuration was installed in 2020, there would be an anticipated increase in average delay for the intersection peak hour of 3 seconds or less. In the design year of 2040, the proposed configuration would see an increase of 7 seconds or less in average delay during the intersection peak hour. The resulting intersection Level-of-Service (LOS) is C or better for all scenarios. For each approach, the traffic volumes are not expected to exceed capacity and queue lengths are not expected to impact driveways or create other safety concerns under normal average conditions. Full results for the MOEs by approach are summarized in Table 7. The Synchro analysis worksheets are available in the attachment. Table 7: Ft Harrison Ave and Belleview Blvd Intersection Analysis Results MOE Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Intersection Existing Proposed Existing Proposed Existing Proposed Existing Proposed Existing Proposed 2020 - AM Peak Delay (s/veh) 15.0 20.2 13.3 15.2 20.4 20.4 31.3 31.3 17.9 20.9 Volume/Capacity 0.70 0.78 0.27 0.44 0.04 0.04 0.75 0.75 - - 50th Queue (veh)** 9.7 9.7 2.3 4.9 0.3 0.3 7.5 7.5 - - 2040 - AM Peak Delay (s/veh) 31.7 32.2 17.9 21.0 19.1 19.1 35.9 35.9 27.9 29.2 Volume/Capacity 0.90 0.90 0.37 0.59 0.04 0.04 0.81 0.81 - - 50th Queue (veh)** 18.3 18.3 3.6 3.6 0.4 0.4 10.4 10.4 - - 2020 - PM Peak Delay (s/veh) 12.1 12.1 12.6 17.8 21.4 21.4 28.7 28.7 15.2 18.0 Volume/Capacity 0.67 0.67 0.42 0.76 0.06 0.06 0.69 0.69 - - 50th Queue (veh)** 3.8 3.8 4.0 10.5 0.4 0.9 5.5 5.5 - - 2040 - PM Peak Delay (s/veh) 15.7 15.8 16.8 24.1 20.3 25.2 30.0 47.6 18.7 25.6 Volume/Capacity 0.76 0.78 0.55 0.88 0.07 0.08 0.75 0.85 - - 50th Queue (veh)** 6.1 5.8 6.1 17.6 0.5 0.6 7.1 9.9 - - *Note: Value represents maximum approach volume to capacity ratio. **Note: Value represents maximum approach queue. Corridor Analysis The corridor capacity analysis determined the existing level of service (LOS) of the corridor using both directional design hourly volume (DDHV) and average annual daily traffic (AADT) using the 2012 generalized service volume tables. Existing year (2018) and future year (2040) analysis was performed for the existing two lane divided with turn lane typical section which is the predominate condition throughout the corridor. In the segment of Ft Harrison Avenue between Belleair Road and Belleview Boulevard, a portion of the segment is four lanes undivided, however the existing lane configuration drops to three general purpose lanes near the Belleview Boulevard intersection and therefore the segment is defined by the two lane divided capacity. The comparative traffic analysis between existing and proposed lane configuration is based on the impact of the intersection volumes for the southbound departing movements from the Belleview Boulevard intersection and the southbound arriving movements at Belleair Road. Generalized Planning Analysis An initial generalized planning analysis for the whole Ft Harrison Avenue corridor was conducted using the available 2018 AADT information. This resulted in a corridor AADT of 15,000 trips and DDHV of 750 trips which is consistent with approach volumes measured in the 72 hour counts for each intersection. On a daily basis, this volume exceeds the Level-of-Service (LOS) E threshold in the three lane section. In the peak hour, peak direction, this volume represents a LOS D. A growth in traffic volume of 1% per year resulting in more than a 20% growth overall would lead to generalized LOS below E regardless of the proposed project. Given that the impact of the study is specific to the removal of the southbound lane between Belleview Boulevard and Belleair Road, additional capacity analysis was performed isolating those southbound lanes. Southbound Departure Analysis In the existing condition, the southbound departure from the Belleview Boulevard intersection has two receiving lanes which continue from Belleview Boulevard through Belleair Road to the next signalized intersection of Ponce De Leon Boulevard / Wyatt Street. At Belleair Road, Ft Harrison Avenue is a four lane undivided roadway without turn lanes. In the proposed roadway configuration, Ft Harrison Avenue is a balanced three-lane section with the middle lane serving as intermittent left turn lanes. The volume on this section, derived from the intersection volume analysis, would start at 888 vehicles departing Belleview Boulevard and would increase to 1018 arriving at Belleair Road, of which 212 would use the newly created left turn lane to continue east on Belleair Road. Using Table 7 – Generalized Peak Hour Directional Volumes for Florida’s Urbanized Areas from the 2013 FDOT QLOS Handbook, it is noted that an uninterrupted flow highway would have a Level of Service E Maximum Service Volume (MSV) of 1,640 vehicles in the peak direction during the peak hour. Adjusted for non-state roadways with left turn lanes, this results in a MSV of 1,558 vehicles per hour. When compared to the 1018 vehicles projected in 2040 to be traveling southbound in the PM peak hour, this results in 65% utilization of the service volume for the proposed configuration. The resulting quality of service for the proposed condition would be LOS D. Conclusion The lane repurposing proposed for Ft Harrison Avenue, specifically from the southbound approach at Belleview Boulevard through Belleair Road, is not projected to have a noticeable negative impact on traffic conditions. At the controlling intersection of Ft Harrison Avenue and Belleview Boulevard, peak hour delays are projected to increase by less than 7 seconds on average in the 2040 proposed configuration versus the existing lane configurations in 2040. The overall intersection LOS remains at C or better for all scenarios. Along the un-interrupted segment, the projected traffic volume represents less than 2/3rd of the maximum service volume and operates at LOS D in the PM peak hour. Attachments 2018 PEAK SEASON FACTOR CATEGORY REPORT - REPORT TYPE: ALL CATEGORY: 1500 PINELLAS COUNTYWIDE MOCF: 0.93 WEEK DATES SF PSCF ================================================================================ 1 01/01/2018 - 01/06/2018 1.07 1.15 2 01/07/2018 - 01/13/2018 1.06 1.14 3 01/14/2018 - 01/20/2018 1.04 1.12 4 01/21/2018 - 01/27/2018 1.02 1.10 5 01/28/2018 - 02/03/2018 0.99 1.06 * 6 02/04/2018 - 02/10/2018 0.96 1.03 * 7 02/11/2018 - 02/17/2018 0.93 1.00 * 8 02/18/2018 - 02/24/2018 0.93 1.00 * 9 02/25/2018 - 03/03/2018 0.92 0.99 *10 03/04/2018 - 03/10/2018 0.92 0.99 *11 03/11/2018 - 03/17/2018 0.91 0.98 *12 03/18/2018 - 03/24/2018 0.92 0.99 *13 03/25/2018 - 03/31/2018 0.92 0.99 *14 04/01/2018 - 04/07/2018 0.93 1.00 *15 04/08/2018 - 04/14/2018 0.93 1.00 *16 04/15/2018 - 04/21/2018 0.94 1.01 *17 04/22/2018 - 04/28/2018 0.96 1.03 *18 04/29/2018 - 05/05/2018 0.98 1.05 19 05/06/2018 - 05/12/2018 1.00 1.08 20 05/13/2018 - 05/19/2018 1.02 1.10 21 05/20/2018 - 05/26/2018 1.01 1.09 22 05/27/2018 - 06/02/2018 0.99 1.06 23 06/03/2018 - 06/09/2018 0.98 1.05 24 06/10/2018 - 06/16/2018 0.97 1.04 25 06/17/2018 - 06/23/2018 0.98 1.05 26 06/24/2018 - 06/30/2018 0.98 1.05 27 07/01/2018 - 07/07/2018 0.99 1.06 28 07/08/2018 - 07/14/2018 1.00 1.08 29 07/15/2018 - 07/21/2018 1.00 1.08 30 07/22/2018 - 07/28/2018 1.01 1.09 31 07/29/2018 - 08/04/2018 1.02 1.10 32 08/05/2018 - 08/11/2018 1.02 1.10 33 08/12/2018 - 08/18/2018 1.03 1.11 34 08/19/2018 - 08/25/2018 1.04 1.12 35 08/26/2018 - 09/01/2018 1.06 1.14 36 09/02/2018 - 09/08/2018 1.07 1.15 37 09/09/2018 - 09/15/2018 1.08 1.16 38 09/16/2018 - 09/22/2018 1.08 1.16 39 09/23/2018 - 09/29/2018 1.07 1.15 40 09/30/2018 - 10/06/2018 1.06 1.14 41 10/07/2018 - 10/13/2018 1.05 1.13 42 10/14/2018 - 10/20/2018 1.05 1.13 43 10/21/2018 - 10/27/2018 1.05 1.13 44 10/28/2018 - 11/03/2018 1.05 1.13 45 11/04/2018 - 11/10/2018 1.04 1.12 46 11/11/2018 - 11/17/2018 1.04 1.12 47 11/18/2018 - 11/24/2018 1.05 1.13 48 11/25/2018 - 12/01/2018 1.06 1.14 49 12/02/2018 - 12/08/2018 1.06 1.14 50 12/09/2018 - 12/15/2018 1.07 1.15 51 12/16/2018 - 12/22/2018 1.06 1.14 52 12/23/2018 - 12/29/2018 1.05 1.13 53 12/30/2018 - 12/31/2018 1.04 1.12 * PEAK SEASON 25-FEB-2019 16:26:29 830UPD 7_1500_PKSEASON.TXT Project: Ft Harrison corridor study Location: Ft Harrison @ Belleair Date: 1/24/2020 Technician: DL Groups Printed- Unshifted Ft Harrison From North Belleair From East Ft Harrison From South Belleair From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total 06:45 AM 07523 0 9835013392 111 0 0 113 0000 0250 Total 0 75 23 0 98 35 0 1 3 39 2 111 0 0 113 0 0 0 0 0 250 07:00 AM 07132 010329 3 2 24 58 4 124 0 0 128 0000 0289 07:15 AM 09516 011154045631 150 0 0 151 0000 0325 07:30 AM 0 102 16 0 118 57 2 3 15 77 3 143 0 0 146 0000 0341 07:45 AM 07713 0 9042 2 11 2 57 3 110 0 0 113 0000 0260 Total 0 345 77 0 422 182 7 20 46 255 11 527 0 0 538 0 0 0 0 0 1215 08:00 AM 09117 010869096841 129 0 1 131 0000 0323 08:15 AM 0 109 22 0 131 64080722 124 0 0 126 0000 0329 08:30 AM 08127 010836050413 125 0 0 128 0000 0277 *** BREAK *** Total 0 281 66 0 347 169 0 22 6 197 6 378 0 1 385 0 0 0 0 0 929 *** BREAK *** 10:45 AM 0 114 38 0 152 31061387 110 0 0 117 0000 0307 Total 0 114 38 0 152 31 0 6 1 38 7 110 0 0 117 0 0 0 0 0 307 *** BREAK *** 11:15 AM 0 134 35 0 169 40 1 11 1 53 188 0 0 89 0000 0311 11:30 AM 0 124 29 0 153 40153493 115 0 0 118 0000 0320 11:45 AM 0 150 39 0 189 31155428 94 0 0 102 0000 0333 Total 0 408 103 0 511 111 3 21 9 144 12 297 0 0 309 0 0 0 0 0 964 12:00 PM 0 126 33 0 159 35 0 16 0 51 11 132 0 0 143 0000 0353 12:15 PM 0 109 39 0 148 40 1 10 3 54 9 116 0 0 125 0000 0327 12:30 PM 0 114 36 0 150 44 0 19 0 63 21 101 0 0 122 0000 0335 12:45 PM 0 104 32 0 136 44080522 102 0 0 104 0000 0292 Total 0 453 140 0 593 163 1 53 3 220 43 451 0 0 494 0 0 0 0 0 1307 *** BREAK *** 03:45 PM 0 127 48 0 175 31 0 13 2 46 5 107 0 0 112 0000 0333 Total 0 127 48 0 175 31 0 13 2 46 5 107 0 0 112 0 0 0 0 0 333 04:00 PM 0 157 35 0 192 21090308 126 0 0 134 0000 0356 04:15 PM 0 166 43 0 209 26 0 17 3 46 3 97 0 0 100 0000 0355 04:30 PM 0 158 30 0 188 2305129392 0 0 95 0000 0312 04:45 PM 0 165 62 0 227 28062366 118 0 0 124 0000 0387 Total 0 646 170 0 816 98 0 37 6 141 20 433 0 0 453 0 0 0 0 0 1410 05:00 PM 0 151 42 0 193 19070263 109 0 0 112 0000 0331 05:15 PM 0 127 32 0 159 16050211 116 0 0 117 0000 0297 05:30 PM 08931 112134 0 13 3 50 872 0 0 80 0000 0251 Grand Total 0 2816 770 1 3587 889 11 198 79 1177 118 2711 0 1 2830 0000 07594 Apprch %0 78.5 21.5 0 75.5 0.9 16.8 6.7 4.2 95.8 00 0000 Total %0 37.1 10.1 0 47.2 11.7 0.1 2.6 1 15.5 1.6 35.7 0 0 37.3 0000 0 City of Cl ear wat er Tr affi c Oper ati ons 100 S. Myrtle Ave Clearwater, FL 33756 Project: Ft Harrison corridor study Location: Ft Harrison @ Belleair Date: 1/24/2020 Technician: DL Ft Harrison Belleair Belleair Ft Harrison Right0 Thru2816 Left770 Peds1 InOut Total3600 3587 7187 Right889 Thru11 Left198 Peds79 OutTotalIn888 1177 2065 Left 0 Thru 2711 Right 118 Peds 1 Out TotalIn 3014 2830 5844 Left0 Thru0 Right0 Peds0 TotalOutIn11 0 11 1/23/2020 06:45 AM1/23/2020 05:30 PM Unshifted North City of Cl ear wat er Tr affi c Oper ati ons 100 S. Myrtle Ave Clearwater, FL 33756 Project: Ft Harrison corridor study Location: Ft Harrison @ Belleair Date: 1/24/2020 Technician: DL Ft Harrison From North Belleair From East Ft Harrison From South Belleair From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 06:45 AM to 05:30 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:00 PM 04:00 PM 0 157 35 0 192 21090308 126 00134 0000 0356 04:15 PM 0 166 43 0 209 26 0 17 3 46 3 97 0 0 100 0000 0355 04:30 PM 0 158 30 0 188 2305129392 0 0 95 0000 0312 04:45 PM 0 165 62 0 227 28 062366 118 0 0 124 0000 0387 Total Volume 0 646 170 0 816 98 0 37 6 141 20 433 0 0 453 0 0 0 0 0 1410 % App. Total 0 79.2 20.8 0 69.5 0 26.2 4.3 4.4 95.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF .000 .973 .685 .000 .899 .875 .000 .544 .500 .766 .625 .859 .000 .000 .845 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .911 Ft Harrison Belleair Belleair Ft Harrison Right 0 Thru 646 Left 170 Peds 0 InOut Total 531 816 1347 Right98 Thru0 Left37 Peds6 OutTotalIn190 141 331 Left0 Thru433 Right20 Peds0 Out TotalIn683 453 1136 Left0 Thru0 Right0 Peds0 TotalOutIn0 0 0 Peak Hour Begins at 04:00 PM Unshifted Peak Hour Data North City of Cl ear wat er Tr affi c Oper ati ons 100 S. Myrtle Ave Clearwater, FL 33756 File Name : ft harrison-belleview Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 1/16/2020 Page No : 1 Project: Ft Harrison corridor study Location: Ft Harrison @ Belleview Date: 1/16/2020 Technician: DL, MG Groups Printed- Unshifted Ft Harrison From North Belleview From East Ft Harrison From South Belleview From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 31 90 1 0 122 0211 426424 1 9112 1 62 1 76 293 07:15 AM 35 107 1 0 143 0141 60 175 18 0 193 8174083425 07:30 AM 51 88 2 0 141 4101 60 161 12 0 173 8155367387 07:45 AM 49 99 0 0 148 1010 22 191 18 1 212 9370183445 Total 166 384 4 0 554 5 4 6 3 18 4 591 72 2 669 37 6 261 5 309 1550 08:00 AM 36 95 2 0 133 2010 30 146 15 0 161 8270080377 08:15 AM 42 60 2 1 105 2440100 165 14 1 180 9079189384 08:30 AM 58 96 3 0 157 1420 70 176 21 0 197 9185095456 08:45 AM 0000 00000 01 121 16 0 138 12 1 67 0 80 218 Total 136 251 7 1 395 5 8 7 0 20 1 608 66 1 676 38 4 301 1 344 1435 *** BREAK *** 10:45 AM 28 52 25 3 108 4034110000 03 102 10 0 115 234 Total 28 52 25 3 108 4 0 3 4 11 0 0 0 0 0 3 102 10 0 115 234 11:00 AM 23 108 14 4 149 3123 90 100 11 0 111 83536 1 80349 11:15 AM 56 141 6 0 203 4215125 104 12 0 121 8053364400 11:30 AM 56 140 5 0 201 1120 42 106 13 0 121 20 1 57 2 80 406 11:45 AM 45 127 7 0 179 54472038212 2 9914 3 43 1 61 359 Total 180 516 32 4 732 13 8 9 15 45 10 392 48 2 452 50 39 189 7 285 1514 12:00 PM 65 141 2 2 210 21271221 83 10 0 114 17 11 52 0 80 416 12:15 PM 49 132 1 7 189 2210 51 121 11 0 133 16 4 33 2 55 382 12:30 PM 51 78 4 7 140 10230150 126 12 1 139 8266076370 *** BREAK *** Total 165 351 7 16 539 14 5 6 7 32 22 330 33 1 386 41 17 151 2 211 1168 *** BREAK *** 03:45 PM 71 144 1 3 219 2140 74 100 21 0 125 18 3 57 0 78 429 Total 71 144 1 3 219 2 1 4 0 7 4 100 21 0 125 18 3 57 0 78 429 04:00 PM 75 163 1 0 239 3360122 123 18 0 143 15 0 62 2 79 473 04:15 PM 83 140 1 3 227 2130 619211 0104 9077086423 04:30 PM 77 179 1 1 258 3110 54 106 15 0 125 7049056444 04:45 PM 75 175 2 6 258 2312 80 107 3 1 111 12 0 50 1 63 440 Total 310 657 5 10 982 10 8 11 2 31 7 428 47 1 483 43 0 238 3 284 1780 05:00 PM 100 182 1 0 283 0101 22 102 9 0 113 13 2 58 0 73 471 05:15 PM 69 123 1 2 195 0431 818021 0102 5371180385 05:30 PM 0000 00000 01 120 9 0 130 8038046176 Grand Total 1225 2660 83 39 4007 53 39 49 33 174 52 2751 326 7 3136 256 176 1374 19 1825 9142 Apprch %30.6 66.4 2.1 1 30.5 22.4 28.2 19 1.7 87.7 10.4 0.2 14 9.6 75.3 1 Total %13.4 29.1 0.9 0.4 43.8 0.6 0.4 0.5 0.4 1.9 0.6 30.1 3.6 0.1 34.3 2.8 1.9 15 0.2 20 City of Cl ear wat er Tr affi c Oper ati ons 100 S. Myrtle Ave Clearwater, FL 33756 File Name : ft harrison-belleview Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 1/16/2020 Page No : 2 Project: Ft Harrison corridor study Location: Ft Harrison @ Belleview Date: 1/16/2020 Technician: DL, MG Ft Harrison Belleview Belleview Ft Harrison Right1225 Thru2660 Left83 Peds39 InOut Total4178 4007 8185 Right53 Thru39 Left49 Peds33 OutTotalIn311 174 485 Left 326 Thru 2751 Right 52 Peds 7 Out TotalIn 2965 3136 6101 Left1374 Thru176 Right256 Peds19 TotalOutIn1590 1825 3415 1/16/2020 07:00 AM1/16/2020 05:30 PM Unshifted North City of Cl ear wat er Tr affi c Oper ati ons 100 S. Myrtle Ave Clearwater, FL 33756 File Name : ft harrison-belleview Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 1/16/2020 Page No : 3 Project: Ft Harrison corridor study Location: Ft Harrison @ Belleview Date: 1/16/2020 Technician: DL, MG Ft Harrison From North Belleview From East Ft Harrison From South Belleview From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 05:30 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:00 PM 04:00 PM 75 163 1 0 239 3360 12 2 123 18 0 143 15 062 2 79 473 04:15 PM 83 140 1 3 227 2130 619211 0104 9077 0 86 423 04:30 PM 77 179 11258 3110 54 106 15 0 125 7049056444 04:45 PM 75 175 26258 2312 8 0 107 3 1 111 12 0 50 1 63 440 Total Volume 310 657 5 10 982 10 8 11 2 31 7 428 47 1 483 43 0 238 3 284 1780 % App. Total 31.6 66.9 0.5 1 32.3 25.8 35.5 6.5 1.4 88.6 9.7 0.2 15.1 0 83.8 1.1 PHF .934 .918 .625 .417 .952 .833 .667 .458 .250 .646 .438 .870 .653 .250 .844 .717 .000 .773 .375 .826 .941 Ft Harrison Belleview Belleview Ft Harrison Right 310 Thru 657 Left 5 Peds 10 InOut Total 676 982 1658 Right10 Thru8 Left11 Peds2 OutTotalIn12 31 43 Left47 Thru428 Right7 Peds1 Out TotalIn711 483 1194 Left238 Thru0 Right43 Peds3 TotalOutIn365 284 649 Peak Hour Begins at 04:00 PM Unshifted Peak Hour Data North City of Cl ear wat er Tr affi c Oper ati ons 100 S. Myrtle Ave Clearwater, FL 33756 File Name : ft harrison-lakeview Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 1/14/2020 Page No : 1 Project: Ft Harrison corridor study Location: Ft Harrison @ Lakeview Rd Date: 1/14/2020 Technician: DL, MG Groups Printed- Unshifted Ft Harrison From North Lakeview From East Ft Harrison From South Lakeview From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 076 2 0 78 402903361 133 0 0 194 0002 2307 07:15 AM 094 3 0 97 705005757 160 0 0 217 0101 2373 07:30 AM 092 3 0 9514 0 47 0 61 83 183 0 1 267 0003 3426 07:45 AM 287 5 0 9415 1 75 1 92 59 178 7 0 244 0000 0430 Total 2 349 13 0 364 40 1 201 1 243 260 654 7 1 922 0 1 0 6 7 1536 08:00 AM 075 2 0 7712 1 59 1 73 44 177 0 0 221 1001 2373 08:15 AM 0 98 2 0 100 16 3 66 0 85 52 159 0 0 211 0001 1397 08:30 AM 090 6 0 96 904515552 175 2 0 229 1101 3383 08:45 AM 186 6 0 9318 0 73 0 91 70 162 0 0 232 2101 4420 Total 1 349 16 0 366 55 4 243 2 304 218 673 2 0 893 4 2 0 4 10 1573 *** BREAK *** 11:00 AM 1 128 11 0 140 13 0 54 0 67 51 142 0 0 193 2102 5405 11:15 AM 0 145 13 0 158 10 0 50 1 61 55 120 0 0 175 1001 2396 11:30 AM 2 135 7 0 144 19 0 42 0 61 55 100 1 0 156 1201 4365 11:45 AM 0 127 15 0 142 715015941 114 0 0 155 1105 7363 Total 3 535 46 0 584 49 1 196 2 248 202 476 1 0 679 5 4 0 9 18 1529 12:00 PM 0 136 15 0 151 19 2 58 1 80 60 114 2 2 178 300912421 12:15 PM 0 109 14 0 123 14 0 47 0 61 44 118 3 0 165 1011 3352 12:30 PM 2 116 14 0 132 13 0 65 3 81 57 143 0 0 200 0100 1414 *** BREAK *** Total 2 361 43 0 406 46 2 170 4 222 161 375 5 2 543 4 1 1 10 16 1187 *** BREAK *** 04:00 PM 0 170 13 0 183 10 0 61 1 72 70 93 0 0 163 1000 1419 04:15 PM 1 171 23 0 195 906117175 90 0 0 165 0010 1432 04:30 PM 2 166 8 1 177 704956160 100 0 0 160 1014 6404 04:45 PM 1 187 8 0 196 306717187 122 0 0 209 0004 4480 Total 4 694 52 1 751 29 0 238 8 275 292 405 0 0 697 2 0 2 8 12 1735 05:00 PM 0 207 21 0 228 406607073 98 0 0 171 1001 2471 05:15 PM 0 160 8 0 168 807028068 105 0 0 173 0000 0421 05:30 PM 0 151 7 1 159 206727167 128 0 0 195 0004 4429 05:45 PM 0 124 3 0 127 905806759 103 0 0 162 0000 0356 Total 0 642 39 1 682 23 0 261 4 288 267 434 0 0 701 1 0 0 5 6 1677 Grand Total 12 2930 209 2 3153 242 8 1309 21 1580 1400 3017 15 3 4435 16 8 3 42 69 9237 Apprch %0.4 92.9 6.6 0.1 15.3 0.5 82.8 1.3 31.6 68 0.3 0.1 23.2 11.6 4.3 60.9 Total %0.1 31.7 2.3 0 34.1 2.6 0.1 14.2 0.2 17.1 15.2 32.7 0.2 0 48 0.2 0.1 0 0.5 0.7 City of Cl ear wat er Tr affi c Oper ati ons 100 S. Myrtle Ave Clearwater, FL 33756 File Name : ft harrison-lakeview Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 1/14/2020 Page No : 2 Project: Ft Harrison corridor study Location: Ft Harrison @ Lakeview Rd Date: 1/14/2020 Technician: DL, MG Ft Harrison Lakeview Lakeview Ft Harrison Right12 Thru2930 Left209 Peds2 InOut Total3262 3153 6415 Right242 Thru8 Left1309 Peds21 OutTotalIn1617 1580 3197 Left 15 Thru 3017 Right 1400 Peds 3 Out TotalIn 4255 4435 8690 Left3 Thru8 Right16 Peds42 TotalOutIn35 69 104 1/14/2020 07:00 AM1/14/2020 05:45 PM Unshifted North City of Cl ear wat er Tr affi c Oper ati ons 100 S. Myrtle Ave Clearwater, FL 33756 File Name : ft harrison-lakeview Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 1/14/2020 Page No : 3 Project: Ft Harrison corridor study Location: Ft Harrison @ Lakeview Rd Date: 1/14/2020 Technician: DL, MG Ft Harrison From North Lakeview From East Ft Harrison From South Lakeview From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:45 PM 04:45 PM 1 187 8 0 196 306717187 122 0 0 209 00044480 05:00 PM 0 207 21 0 228 406607073 98 0 0 171 1 001 2471 05:15 PM 0 160 8 0 168 8 0 70 2 80 68 105 0 0 173 0000 0421 05:30 PM 0 151 7 1 159 206727167 128 0 0 195 0004 4429 Total Volume 1 705 44 1 751 17 0 270 5 292 295 453 0 0 748 1 0 0 9 10 1801 % App. Total 0.1 93.9 5.9 0.1 5.8 0 92.5 1.7 39.4 60.6 0 0 10 0 0 90 PHF .250 .851 .524 .250 .823 .531 .000 .964 .625 .913 .848 .885 .000 .000 .895 .250 .000 .000 .563 .625 .938 Ft Harrison Lakeview Lakeview Ft Harrison Right 1 Thru 705 Left 44 Peds 1 InOut Total 470 751 1221 Right17 Thru0 Left270 Peds5 OutTotalIn339 292 631 Left0 Thru453 Right295 Peds0 Out TotalIn976 748 1724 Left0 Thru0 Right1 Peds9 TotalOutIn1 10 11 Peak Hour Begins at 04:45 PM Unshifted Peak Hour Data North City of Cl ear wat er Tr affi c Oper ati ons 100 S. Myrtle Ave Clearwater, FL 33756 Project: Ft Harrison corridor study Location: Ft Harrison @ Belleair Date: 1/24/2020 Technician: DL Groups Printed- Unshifted Ft Harrison From North Belleair From East Ft Harrison From South Belleair From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total 06:45 AM 07523 0 9835013392 111 0 0 113 0000 0250 Total 0 75 23 0 98 35 0 1 3 39 2 111 0 0 113 0 0 0 0 0 250 07:00 AM 07132 010329 3 2 24 58 4 124 0 0 128 0000 0289 07:15 AM 09516 011154045631 150 0 0 151 0000 0325 07:30 AM 0 102 16 0 118 57 2 3 15 77 3 143 0 0 146 0000 0341 07:45 AM 07713 0 9042 2 11 2 57 3 110 0 0 113 0000 0260 Total 0 345 77 0 422 182 7 20 46 255 11 527 0 0 538 0 0 0 0 0 1215 08:00 AM 09117 010869096841 129 0 1 131 0000 0323 08:15 AM 0 109 22 0 131 64080722 124 0 0 126 0000 0329 08:30 AM 08127 010836050413 125 0 0 128 0000 0277 *** BREAK *** Total 0 281 66 0 347 169 0 22 6 197 6 378 0 1 385 0 0 0 0 0 929 *** BREAK *** 10:45 AM 0 114 38 0 152 31061387 110 0 0 117 0000 0307 Total 0 114 38 0 152 31 0 6 1 38 7 110 0 0 117 0 0 0 0 0 307 *** BREAK *** 11:15 AM 0 134 35 0 169 40 1 11 1 53 188 0 0 89 0000 0311 11:30 AM 0 124 29 0 153 40153493 115 0 0 118 0000 0320 11:45 AM 0 150 39 0 189 31155428 94 0 0 102 0000 0333 Total 0 408 103 0 511 111 3 21 9 144 12 297 0 0 309 0 0 0 0 0 964 12:00 PM 0 126 33 0 159 35 0 16 0 51 11 132 0 0 143 0000 0353 12:15 PM 0 109 39 0 148 40 1 10 3 54 9 116 0 0 125 0000 0327 12:30 PM 0 114 36 0 150 44 0 19 0 63 21 101 0 0 122 0000 0335 12:45 PM 0 104 32 0 136 44080522 102 0 0 104 0000 0292 Total 0 453 140 0 593 163 1 53 3 220 43 451 0 0 494 0 0 0 0 0 1307 *** BREAK *** 03:45 PM 0 127 48 0 175 31 0 13 2 46 5 107 0 0 112 0000 0333 Total 0 127 48 0 175 31 0 13 2 46 5 107 0 0 112 0 0 0 0 0 333 04:00 PM 0 157 35 0 192 21090308 126 0 0 134 0000 0356 04:15 PM 0 166 43 0 209 26 0 17 3 46 3 97 0 0 100 0000 0355 04:30 PM 0 158 30 0 188 2305129392 0 0 95 0000 0312 04:45 PM 0 165 62 0 227 28062366 118 0 0 124 0000 0387 Total 0 646 170 0 816 98 0 37 6 141 20 433 0 0 453 0 0 0 0 0 1410 05:00 PM 0 151 42 0 193 19070263 109 0 0 112 0000 0331 05:15 PM 0 127 32 0 159 16050211 116 0 0 117 0000 0297 05:30 PM 08931 112134 0 13 3 50 872 0 0 80 0000 0251 Grand Total 0 2816 770 1 3587 889 11 198 79 1177 118 2711 0 1 2830 0000 07594 Apprch %0 78.5 21.5 0 75.5 0.9 16.8 6.7 4.2 95.8 00 0000 Total %0 37.1 10.1 0 47.2 11.7 0.1 2.6 1 15.5 1.6 35.7 0 0 37.3 0000 0 City of Cl ear wat er Tr affi c Oper ati ons 100 S. Myrtle Ave Clearwater, FL 33756 Project: Ft Harrison corridor study Location: Ft Harrison @ Belleair Date: 1/24/2020 Technician: DL Ft Harrison Belleair Belleair Ft Harrison Right0 Thru2816 Left770 Peds1 InOut Total3600 3587 7187 Right889 Thru11 Left198 Peds79 OutTotalIn888 1177 2065 Left 0 Thru 2711 Right 118 Peds 1 Out TotalIn 3014 2830 5844 Left0 Thru0 Right0 Peds0 TotalOutIn11 0 11 1/23/2020 06:45 AM1/23/2020 05:30 PM Unshifted North City of Cl ear wat er Tr affi c Oper ati ons 100 S. Myrtle Ave Clearwater, FL 33756 Project: Ft Harrison corridor study Location: Ft Harrison @ Belleair Date: 1/24/2020 Technician: DL Ft Harrison From North Belleair From East Ft Harrison From South Belleair From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 06:45 AM to 05:30 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:00 PM 04:00 PM 0 157 35 0 192 21090308 126 00134 0000 0356 04:15 PM 0 166 43 0 209 26 0 17 3 46 3 97 0 0 100 0000 0355 04:30 PM 0 158 30 0 188 2305129392 0 0 95 0000 0312 04:45 PM 0 165 62 0 227 28 062366 118 0 0 124 0000 0387 Total Volume 0 646 170 0 816 98 0 37 6 141 20 433 0 0 453 0 0 0 0 0 1410 % App. Total 0 79.2 20.8 0 69.5 0 26.2 4.3 4.4 95.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF .000 .973 .685 .000 .899 .875 .000 .544 .500 .766 .625 .859 .000 .000 .845 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .911 Ft Harrison Belleair Belleair Ft Harrison Right 0 Thru 646 Left 170 Peds 0 InOut Total 531 816 1347 Right98 Thru0 Left37 Peds6 OutTotalIn190 141 331 Left0 Thru433 Right20 Peds0 Out TotalIn683 453 1136 Left0 Thru0 Right0 Peds0 TotalOutIn0 0 0 Peak Hour Begins at 04:00 PM Unshifted Peak Hour Data North City of Cl ear wat er Tr affi c Oper ati ons 100 S. Myrtle Ave Clearwater, FL 33756 File Name : ft harrison-belleview Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 1/16/2020 Page No : 1 Project: Ft Harrison corridor study Location: Ft Harrison @ Belleview Date: 1/16/2020 Technician: DL, MG Groups Printed- Unshifted Ft Harrison From North Belleview From East Ft Harrison From South Belleview From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 31 90 1 0 122 0211 426424 1 9112 1 62 1 76 293 07:15 AM 35 107 1 0 143 0141 60 175 18 0 193 8174083425 07:30 AM 51 88 2 0 141 4101 60 161 12 0 173 8155367387 07:45 AM 49 99 0 0 148 1010 22 191 18 1 212 9370183445 Total 166 384 4 0 554 5 4 6 3 18 4 591 72 2 669 37 6 261 5 309 1550 08:00 AM 36 95 2 0 133 2010 30 146 15 0 161 8270080377 08:15 AM 42 60 2 1 105 2440100 165 14 1 180 9079189384 08:30 AM 58 96 3 0 157 1420 70 176 21 0 197 9185095456 08:45 AM 0000 00000 01 121 16 0 138 12 1 67 0 80 218 Total 136 251 7 1 395 5 8 7 0 20 1 608 66 1 676 38 4 301 1 344 1435 *** BREAK *** 10:45 AM 28 52 25 3 108 4034110000 03 102 10 0 115 234 Total 28 52 25 3 108 4 0 3 4 11 0 0 0 0 0 3 102 10 0 115 234 11:00 AM 23 108 14 4 149 3123 90 100 11 0 111 83536 1 80349 11:15 AM 56 141 6 0 203 4215125 104 12 0 121 8053364400 11:30 AM 56 140 5 0 201 1120 42 106 13 0 121 20 1 57 2 80 406 11:45 AM 45 127 7 0 179 54472038212 2 9914 3 43 1 61 359 Total 180 516 32 4 732 13 8 9 15 45 10 392 48 2 452 50 39 189 7 285 1514 12:00 PM 65 141 2 2 210 21271221 83 10 0 114 17 11 52 0 80 416 12:15 PM 49 132 1 7 189 2210 51 121 11 0 133 16 4 33 2 55 382 12:30 PM 51 78 4 7 140 10230150 126 12 1 139 8266076370 *** BREAK *** Total 165 351 7 16 539 14 5 6 7 32 22 330 33 1 386 41 17 151 2 211 1168 *** BREAK *** 03:45 PM 71 144 1 3 219 2140 74 100 21 0 125 18 3 57 0 78 429 Total 71 144 1 3 219 2 1 4 0 7 4 100 21 0 125 18 3 57 0 78 429 04:00 PM 75 163 1 0 239 3360122 123 18 0 143 15 0 62 2 79 473 04:15 PM 83 140 1 3 227 2130 619211 0104 9077086423 04:30 PM 77 179 1 1 258 3110 54 106 15 0 125 7049056444 04:45 PM 75 175 2 6 258 2312 80 107 3 1 111 12 0 50 1 63 440 Total 310 657 5 10 982 10 8 11 2 31 7 428 47 1 483 43 0 238 3 284 1780 05:00 PM 100 182 1 0 283 0101 22 102 9 0 113 13 2 58 0 73 471 05:15 PM 69 123 1 2 195 0431 818021 0102 5371180385 05:30 PM 0000 00000 01 120 9 0 130 8038046176 Grand Total 1225 2660 83 39 4007 53 39 49 33 174 52 2751 326 7 3136 256 176 1374 19 1825 9142 Apprch %30.6 66.4 2.1 1 30.5 22.4 28.2 19 1.7 87.7 10.4 0.2 14 9.6 75.3 1 Total %13.4 29.1 0.9 0.4 43.8 0.6 0.4 0.5 0.4 1.9 0.6 30.1 3.6 0.1 34.3 2.8 1.9 15 0.2 20 City of Cl ear wat er Tr affi c Oper ati ons 100 S. Myrtle Ave Clearwater, FL 33756 File Name : ft harrison-belleview Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 1/16/2020 Page No : 2 Project: Ft Harrison corridor study Location: Ft Harrison @ Belleview Date: 1/16/2020 Technician: DL, MG Ft Harrison Belleview Belleview Ft Harrison Right1225 Thru2660 Left83 Peds39 InOut Total4178 4007 8185 Right53 Thru39 Left49 Peds33 OutTotalIn311 174 485 Left 326 Thru 2751 Right 52 Peds 7 Out TotalIn 2965 3136 6101 Left1374 Thru176 Right256 Peds19 TotalOutIn1590 1825 3415 1/16/2020 07:00 AM1/16/2020 05:30 PM Unshifted North City of Cl ear wat er Tr affi c Oper ati ons 100 S. Myrtle Ave Clearwater, FL 33756 File Name : ft harrison-belleview Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 1/16/2020 Page No : 3 Project: Ft Harrison corridor study Location: Ft Harrison @ Belleview Date: 1/16/2020 Technician: DL, MG Ft Harrison From North Belleview From East Ft Harrison From South Belleview From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 05:30 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:00 PM 04:00 PM 75 163 1 0 239 3360 12 2 123 18 0 143 15 062 2 79 473 04:15 PM 83 140 1 3 227 2130 619211 0104 9077 0 86 423 04:30 PM 77 179 11258 3110 54 106 15 0 125 7049056444 04:45 PM 75 175 26258 2312 8 0 107 3 1 111 12 0 50 1 63 440 Total Volume 310 657 5 10 982 10 8 11 2 31 7 428 47 1 483 43 0 238 3 284 1780 % App. Total 31.6 66.9 0.5 1 32.3 25.8 35.5 6.5 1.4 88.6 9.7 0.2 15.1 0 83.8 1.1 PHF .934 .918 .625 .417 .952 .833 .667 .458 .250 .646 .438 .870 .653 .250 .844 .717 .000 .773 .375 .826 .941 Ft Harrison Belleview Belleview Ft Harrison Right 310 Thru 657 Left 5 Peds 10 InOut Total 676 982 1658 Right10 Thru8 Left11 Peds2 OutTotalIn12 31 43 Left47 Thru428 Right7 Peds1 Out TotalIn711 483 1194 Left238 Thru0 Right43 Peds3 TotalOutIn365 284 649 Peak Hour Begins at 04:00 PM Unshifted Peak Hour Data North City of Cl ear wat er Tr affi c Oper ati ons 100 S. Myrtle Ave Clearwater, FL 33756 File Name : ft harrison-lakeview Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 1/14/2020 Page No : 1 Project: Ft Harrison corridor study Location: Ft Harrison @ Lakeview Rd Date: 1/14/2020 Technician: DL, MG Groups Printed- Unshifted Ft Harrison From North Lakeview From East Ft Harrison From South Lakeview From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 076 2 0 78 402903361 133 0 0 194 0002 2307 07:15 AM 094 3 0 97 705005757 160 0 0 217 0101 2373 07:30 AM 092 3 0 9514 0 47 0 61 83 183 0 1 267 0003 3426 07:45 AM 287 5 0 9415 1 75 1 92 59 178 7 0 244 0000 0430 Total 2 349 13 0 364 40 1 201 1 243 260 654 7 1 922 0 1 0 6 7 1536 08:00 AM 075 2 0 7712 1 59 1 73 44 177 0 0 221 1001 2373 08:15 AM 0 98 2 0 100 16 3 66 0 85 52 159 0 0 211 0001 1397 08:30 AM 090 6 0 96 904515552 175 2 0 229 1101 3383 08:45 AM 186 6 0 9318 0 73 0 91 70 162 0 0 232 2101 4420 Total 1 349 16 0 366 55 4 243 2 304 218 673 2 0 893 4 2 0 4 10 1573 *** BREAK *** 11:00 AM 1 128 11 0 140 13 0 54 0 67 51 142 0 0 193 2102 5405 11:15 AM 0 145 13 0 158 10 0 50 1 61 55 120 0 0 175 1001 2396 11:30 AM 2 135 7 0 144 19 0 42 0 61 55 100 1 0 156 1201 4365 11:45 AM 0 127 15 0 142 715015941 114 0 0 155 1105 7363 Total 3 535 46 0 584 49 1 196 2 248 202 476 1 0 679 5 4 0 9 18 1529 12:00 PM 0 136 15 0 151 19 2 58 1 80 60 114 2 2 178 300912421 12:15 PM 0 109 14 0 123 14 0 47 0 61 44 118 3 0 165 1011 3352 12:30 PM 2 116 14 0 132 13 0 65 3 81 57 143 0 0 200 0100 1414 *** BREAK *** Total 2 361 43 0 406 46 2 170 4 222 161 375 5 2 543 4 1 1 10 16 1187 *** BREAK *** 04:00 PM 0 170 13 0 183 10 0 61 1 72 70 93 0 0 163 1000 1419 04:15 PM 1 171 23 0 195 906117175 90 0 0 165 0010 1432 04:30 PM 2 166 8 1 177 704956160 100 0 0 160 1014 6404 04:45 PM 1 187 8 0 196 306717187 122 0 0 209 0004 4480 Total 4 694 52 1 751 29 0 238 8 275 292 405 0 0 697 2 0 2 8 12 1735 05:00 PM 0 207 21 0 228 406607073 98 0 0 171 1001 2471 05:15 PM 0 160 8 0 168 807028068 105 0 0 173 0000 0421 05:30 PM 0 151 7 1 159 206727167 128 0 0 195 0004 4429 05:45 PM 0 124 3 0 127 905806759 103 0 0 162 0000 0356 Total 0 642 39 1 682 23 0 261 4 288 267 434 0 0 701 1 0 0 5 6 1677 Grand Total 12 2930 209 2 3153 242 8 1309 21 1580 1400 3017 15 3 4435 16 8 3 42 69 9237 Apprch %0.4 92.9 6.6 0.1 15.3 0.5 82.8 1.3 31.6 68 0.3 0.1 23.2 11.6 4.3 60.9 Total %0.1 31.7 2.3 0 34.1 2.6 0.1 14.2 0.2 17.1 15.2 32.7 0.2 0 48 0.2 0.1 0 0.5 0.7 City of Cl ear wat er Tr affi c Oper ati ons 100 S. Myrtle Ave Clearwater, FL 33756 File Name : ft harrison-lakeview Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 1/14/2020 Page No : 2 Project: Ft Harrison corridor study Location: Ft Harrison @ Lakeview Rd Date: 1/14/2020 Technician: DL, MG Ft Harrison Lakeview Lakeview Ft Harrison Right12 Thru2930 Left209 Peds2 InOut Total3262 3153 6415 Right242 Thru8 Left1309 Peds21 OutTotalIn1617 1580 3197 Left 15 Thru 3017 Right 1400 Peds 3 Out TotalIn 4255 4435 8690 Left3 Thru8 Right16 Peds42 TotalOutIn35 69 104 1/14/2020 07:00 AM1/14/2020 05:45 PM Unshifted North City of Cl ear wat er Tr affi c Oper ati ons 100 S. Myrtle Ave Clearwater, FL 33756 File Name : ft harrison-lakeview Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 1/14/2020 Page No : 3 Project: Ft Harrison corridor study Location: Ft Harrison @ Lakeview Rd Date: 1/14/2020 Technician: DL, MG Ft Harrison From North Lakeview From East Ft Harrison From South Lakeview From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:45 PM 04:45 PM 1 187 8 0 196 306717187 122 0 0 209 00044480 05:00 PM 0 207 21 0 228 406607073 98 0 0 171 1 001 2471 05:15 PM 0 160 8 0 168 8 0 70 2 80 68 105 0 0 173 0000 0421 05:30 PM 0 151 7 1 159 206727167 128 0 0 195 0004 4429 Total Volume 1 705 44 1 751 17 0 270 5 292 295 453 0 0 748 1 0 0 9 10 1801 % App. Total 0.1 93.9 5.9 0.1 5.8 0 92.5 1.7 39.4 60.6 0 0 10 0 0 90 PHF .250 .851 .524 .250 .823 .531 .000 .964 .625 .913 .848 .885 .000 .000 .895 .250 .000 .000 .563 .625 .938 Ft Harrison Lakeview Lakeview Ft Harrison Right 1 Thru 705 Left 44 Peds 1 InOut Total 470 751 1221 Right17 Thru0 Left270 Peds5 OutTotalIn339 292 631 Left0 Thru453 Right295 Peds0 Out TotalIn976 748 1724 Left0 Thru0 Right1 Peds9 TotalOutIn1 10 11 Peak Hour Begins at 04:45 PM Unshifted Peak Hour Data North City of Cl ear wat er Tr affi c Oper ati ons 100 S. Myrtle Ave Clearwater, FL 33756 24 Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: LOCATION: SB S Fort Harrison Ave N of Belleview Blvd QC JOB #: QC JOB #: 15067718 SPECIFIC LOCATION:SPECIFIC LOCATION:DIRECTION: DIRECTION: SB CITY/STATE: CITY/STATE: Clearwater, FL DATE: DATE: Oct 8 2019 - Oct 10 2019 Start TimeStart Time MonMon TueTue WedWed ThuThu FriFri Average Weekday Average Weekday Hourly TrafficHourly Traffic SatSat SunSun Average Week Average Week Hourly TrafficHourly Traffic Average Week ProfileAverage Week Profile8 Oct 19 9 Oct 19 10 Oct 19 12:00 AM 34 47 50 44 44 01:00 AM 26 29 32 29 29 02:00 AM 17 17 21 18 18 03:00 AM 12 17 20 16 16 04:00 AM 26 22 25 24 24 05:00 AM 54 54 54 54 54 06:00 AM 237 215 218 223 223 07:00 AM 553 552 584 563 563 08:00 AM 631 637 580 616 616 09:00 AM 669 634 632 645 645 10:00 AM 663 739 767 723 723 11:00 AM 701701 742742 897897 780780 780780 12:00 PM 764 784 724 757 757 01:00 PM 742 670 709 707 707 02:00 PM 874 796 873 848 848 03:00 PM 993 931 970 965 965 04:00 PM 10501050 10331033 11071107 10631063 10631063 05:00 PM 903 924 974 934 934 06:00 PM 555 549 644 583 583 07:00 PM 484 467 484 478 478 08:00 PM 299 338 319 319 319 09:00 PM 209 235 242 229 229 10:00 PM 147 175 200 174 174 11:00 PM 100 138 123 120 120 Day TotalDay Total 10743 10745 11249 10912 10912 % Weekday Average 98.5% 98.5% 103.1% % Week Average 98.5% 98.5% 103.1%100% AM Peak Volume 11:00 AM 701 11:00 AM 742 11:00 AM 897 11:00 AM 780 11:00 AM 780 PM Peak Volume 4:00 PM 1050 4:00 PM 1033 4:00 PM 1107 4:00 PM 1063 4:00 PM 1063 Comments: Report generated on 10/21/2019 8:05 AM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 24 Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: LOCATION: WB Belleview Blvd E of S Fort Harrison Ave QC JOB #: QC JOB #: 15067719 SPECIFIC LOCATION:SPECIFIC LOCATION:DIRECTION: DIRECTION: WB CITY/STATE: CITY/STATE: Clearwater, FL DATE: DATE: Oct 8 2019 - Oct 10 2019 Start TimeStart Time MonMon TueTue WedWed ThuThu FriFri Average Weekday Average Weekday Hourly TrafficHourly Traffic SatSat SunSun Average Week Average Week Hourly TrafficHourly Traffic Average Week ProfileAverage Week Profile8 Oct 19 9 Oct 19 10 Oct 19 12:00 AM 1 2 3 2 2 01:00 AM 0 1 0 0 0 02:00 AM 0 1 1 1 1 03:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 05:00 AM 2 2 3 2 2 06:00 AM 9 13 8 10 10 07:00 AM 12 10 1919 14 14 08:00 AM 17 17 17 17 17 09:00 AM 13 23 18 18 18 10:00 AM 2121 14 11 15 15 11:00 AM 18 3535 13 2222 2222 12:00 PM 17 14 8 13 13 01:00 PM 14 12 25 17 17 02:00 PM 18 9 15 14 14 03:00 PM 16 15 15 15 15 04:00 PM 2121 1818 2828 2222 2222 05:00 PM 17 14 9 13 13 06:00 PM 2 10 10 7 7 07:00 PM 8 4 3 5 5 08:00 PM 3 4 9 5 5 09:00 PM 10 2 2 5 5 10:00 PM 2 7 0 3 3 11:00 PM 1 1 2 1 1 Day TotalDay Total 222 228 219 221 221 % Weekday Average 100.5% 103.2% 99.1% % Week Average 100.5% 103.2% 99.1%100% AM Peak Volume 10:00 AM 21 11:00 AM 35 7:00 AM 19 11:00 AM 22 11:00 AM 22 PM Peak Volume 4:00 PM 21 4:00 PM 18 4:00 PM 28 4:00 PM 22 4:00 PM 22 Comments: Report generated on 10/21/2019 8:05 AM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 24 Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: LOCATION: NB S Fort Harrison Ave S of Belleview Blvd QC JOB #: QC JOB #: 15067720 SPECIFIC LOCATION:SPECIFIC LOCATION:DIRECTION: DIRECTION: NB CITY/STATE: CITY/STATE: Clearwater, FL DATE: DATE: Oct 8 2019 - Oct 10 2019 Start TimeStart Time MonMon TueTue WedWed ThuThu FriFri Average Weekday Average Weekday Hourly TrafficHourly Traffic SatSat SunSun Average Week Average Week Hourly TrafficHourly Traffic Average Week ProfileAverage Week Profile8 Oct 19 9 Oct 19 10 Oct 19 12:00 AM 15 20 29 21 21 01:00 AM 18 26 18 21 21 02:00 AM 11 11 11 11 11 03:00 AM 23 20 20 21 21 04:00 AM 50 47 48 48 48 05:00 AM 184 202 200 195 195 06:00 AM 476 462 502 480 480 07:00 AM 734734 718718 737737 730730 730730 08:00 AM 634 687 693 671 671 09:00 AM 574 577 613 588 588 10:00 AM 499 512 564 525 525 11:00 AM 498 488 495 494 494 12:00 PM 578578 590590 583 584584 584584 01:00 PM 575 515 590590 560 560 02:00 PM 539 535 532 535 535 03:00 PM 550 513 560 541 541 04:00 PM 502 480 540 507 507 05:00 PM 493 484 461 479 479 06:00 PM 392 378 405 392 392 07:00 PM 216 234 215 222 222 08:00 PM 148 171 165 161 161 09:00 PM 100 124 121 115 115 10:00 PM 82 97 118 99 99 11:00 PM 45 47 50 47 47 Day TotalDay Total 7936 7938 8270 8047 8047 % Weekday Average 98.6% 98.6% 102.8% % Week Average 98.6% 98.6% 102.8%100% AM Peak Volume 7:00 AM 734 7:00 AM 718 7:00 AM 737 7:00 AM 730 7:00 AM 730 PM Peak Volume 12:00 PM 578 12:00 PM 590 1:00 PM 590 12:00 PM 584 12:00 PM 584 Comments: Report generated on 10/21/2019 8:05 AM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 24 Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: LOCATION: EB Belleview Blvd W of S Fort Harrison Ave QC JOB #: QC JOB #: 15067721 SPECIFIC LOCATION:SPECIFIC LOCATION:DIRECTION: DIRECTION: EB CITY/STATE: CITY/STATE: Clearwater, FL DATE: DATE: Oct 8 2019 - Oct 10 2019 Start TimeStart Time MonMon TueTue WedWed ThuThu FriFri Average Weekday Average Weekday Hourly TrafficHourly Traffic SatSat SunSun Average Week Average Week Hourly TrafficHourly Traffic Average Week ProfileAverage Week Profile8 Oct 19 9 Oct 19 10 Oct 19 12:00 AM 2 3 5 3 3 01:00 AM 3 3 3 3 3 02:00 AM 2 1 6 3 3 03:00 AM 7 3 4 5 5 04:00 AM 18 13 15 15 15 05:00 AM 39 46 43 43 43 06:00 AM 137 151 143 144 144 07:00 AM 340340 328 319 329329 329329 08:00 AM 298 322 348348 323 323 09:00 AM 283 330330 333 315 315 10:00 AM 262 291 279 277 277 11:00 AM 294 271 281 282 282 12:00 PM 294 301 314 303 303 01:00 PM 311 290 319 307 307 02:00 PM 310 329329 306 315 315 03:00 PM 322322 315 321321 319319 319319 04:00 PM 295 308 303 302 302 05:00 PM 263 272 258 264 264 06:00 PM 168 156 172 165 165 07:00 PM 154 105 150 136 136 08:00 PM 73 86 76 78 78 09:00 PM 48 63 62 58 58 10:00 PM 27 38 40 35 35 11:00 PM 17 18 20 18 18 Day TotalDay Total 3967 4043 4120 4042 4042 % Weekday Average 98.1% 100% 101.9% % Week Average 98.1% 100% 101.9%100% AM Peak Volume 7:00 AM 340 9:00 AM 330 8:00 AM 348 7:00 AM 329 7:00 AM 329 PM Peak Volume 3:00 PM 322 2:00 PM 329 3:00 PM 321 3:00 PM 319 3:00 PM 319 Comments: Report generated on 10/21/2019 8:05 AM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 24 Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: LOCATION: SB S Fort Harrison Ave N of Belleair Rd QC JOB #: QC JOB #: 15067722 SPECIFIC LOCATION:SPECIFIC LOCATION:DIRECTION: DIRECTION: SB CITY/STATE: CITY/STATE: Clearwater, FL DATE: DATE: Oct 7 2019 - Oct 9 2019 Start TimeStart Time MonMon TueTue WedWed ThuThu FriFri Average Weekday Average Weekday Hourly TrafficHourly Traffic SatSat SunSun Average Week Average Week Hourly TrafficHourly Traffic Average Week ProfileAverage Week Profile7 Oct 19 8 Oct 19 9 Oct 19 12:00 AM 0 29 40 23 23 01:00 AM 0 23 27 17 17 02:00 AM 0 17 18 12 12 03:00 AM 0 9 15 8 8 04:00 AM 2 20 17 13 13 05:00 AM 2 58 50 37 37 06:00 AM 0 218 202 140 140 07:00 AM 0 439 409 283 283 08:00 AM 23 403 419 282 282 09:00 AM 480 448 450 459 459 10:00 AM 536 517 523 525 525 11:00 AM 549549 530530 547547 542542 542542 12:00 PM 580 556 568 568 568 01:00 PM 526 553 524 534 534 02:00 PM 610 687 577 625 625 03:00 PM 641 707 675 674 674 04:00 PM 744744 761761 813813 773773 773773 05:00 PM 700 686 688 691 691 06:00 PM 410 405 416 410 410 07:00 PM 320 386 351 352 352 08:00 PM 205 220 237 221 221 09:00 PM 137 153 183 158 158 10:00 PM 110 116 133 120 120 11:00 PM 90 83 111 95 95 Day TotalDay Total 6665 8024 7993 7562 7562 % Weekday Average 88.1% 106.1% 105.7% % Week Average 88.1% 106.1% 105.7%100% AM Peak Volume 11:00 AM 549 11:00 AM 530 11:00 AM 547 11:00 AM 542 11:00 AM 542 PM Peak Volume 4:00 PM 744 4:00 PM 761 4:00 PM 813 4:00 PM 773 4:00 PM 773 Comments: Report generated on 10/21/2019 8:05 AM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 24 Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: LOCATION: WB Belleair Rd E of S Fort Harrison Ave QC JOB #: QC JOB #: 15067723 SPECIFIC LOCATION:SPECIFIC LOCATION:DIRECTION: DIRECTION: WB CITY/STATE: CITY/STATE: Clearwater, FL DATE: DATE: Oct 8 2019 - Oct 10 2019 Start TimeStart Time MonMon TueTue WedWed ThuThu FriFri Average Weekday Average Weekday Hourly TrafficHourly Traffic SatSat SunSun Average Week Average Week Hourly TrafficHourly Traffic Average Week ProfileAverage Week Profile8 Oct 19 9 Oct 19 10 Oct 19 12:00 AM 19 24 30 24 24 01:00 AM 9 5 11 8 8 02:00 AM 6 8 14 9 9 03:00 AM 9 10 14 11 11 04:00 AM 30 26 18 25 25 05:00 AM 96 101 106 101 101 06:00 AM 250 273 295 273 273 07:00 AM 446446 476476 461 461461 461461 08:00 AM 424 426 477477 442 442 09:00 AM 383 361 378 374 374 10:00 AM 311 332 355 333 333 11:00 AM 292 343 330 322 322 12:00 PM 383 338 361 361 361 01:00 PM 384384 359359 357 367367 367367 02:00 PM 361 335 364364 353 353 03:00 PM 311 338 343 331 331 04:00 PM 288 252 251 264 264 05:00 PM 262 246 249 252 252 06:00 PM 276 215 201 231 231 07:00 PM 121 163 135 140 140 08:00 PM 115 90 78 94 94 09:00 PM 63 74 98 78 78 10:00 PM 66 70 51 62 62 11:00 PM 35 27 32 31 31 Day TotalDay Total 4940 4892 5009 4947 4947 % Weekday Average 99.9% 98.9% 101.3% % Week Average 99.9% 98.9% 101.3%100% AM Peak Volume 7:00 AM 446 7:00 AM 476 8:00 AM 477 7:00 AM 461 7:00 AM 461 PM Peak Volume 1:00 PM 384 1:00 PM 359 2:00 PM 364 1:00 PM 367 1:00 PM 367 Comments: Report generated on 10/21/2019 8:05 AM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 24 Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: LOCATION: NB S Fort Harrison Ave S of Belleair Rd QC JOB #: QC JOB #: 15067724 SPECIFIC LOCATION:SPECIFIC LOCATION:DIRECTION: DIRECTION: NB CITY/STATE: CITY/STATE: Clearwater, FL DATE: DATE: Oct 8 2019 - Oct 10 2019 Start TimeStart Time MonMon TueTue WedWed ThuThu FriFri Average Weekday Average Weekday Hourly TrafficHourly Traffic SatSat SunSun Average Week Average Week Hourly TrafficHourly Traffic Average Week ProfileAverage Week Profile8 Oct 19 9 Oct 19 10 Oct 19 12:00 AM 14 17 20 17 17 01:00 AM 15 22 22 20 20 02:00 AM 13 15 4 11 11 03:00 AM 14 12 16 14 14 04:00 AM 31 20 30 27 27 05:00 AM 95 90 85 90 90 06:00 AM 295 294 310 300 300 07:00 AM 514514 483 485 494 494 08:00 AM 476 506506 519519 500500 500500 09:00 AM 424 440 448 437 437 10:00 AM 380 385 433 399 399 11:00 AM 384 382 378 381 381 12:00 PM 451451 440440 438 443443 443443 01:00 PM 421 427 437 428 428 02:00 PM 443 407 466466 439 439 03:00 PM 439 396 423 419 419 04:00 PM 432 375 427 411 411 05:00 PM 388 408 426 407 407 06:00 PM 350 284 317 317 317 07:00 PM 187 213 204 201 201 08:00 PM 136 167 148 150 150 09:00 PM 84 100 103 96 96 10:00 PM 67 72 97 79 79 11:00 PM 39 41 43 41 41 Day TotalDay Total 6092 5996 6279 6121 6121 % Weekday Average 99.5% 98% 102.6% % Week Average 99.5% 98% 102.6%100% AM Peak Volume 7:00 AM 514 8:00 AM 506 8:00 AM 519 8:00 AM 500 8:00 AM 500 PM Peak Volume 12:00 PM 451 12:00 PM 440 2:00 PM 466 12:00 PM 443 12:00 PM 443 Comments: Report generated on 10/21/2019 8:05 AM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) AM PEAK 2020 EXISTING CONFIGURATION Synchro 10 Report Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 316 6 36 8 8 6 71 705 2 7 364 192 Future Volume (veh/h) 316 6 36 8 8 6 71 705 2 7 364 192 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 343 7 39 9 9 7 77 766 2 8 396 209 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, %222222222222 Cap, veh/h 465 8 44 223 219 149 515 1096 3 55 1659 766 Arrive On Green 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.05 0.59 0.59 0.48 0.48 0.48 Sat Flow, veh/h 1263 26 144 541 722 491 1781 1865 5 20 3433 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 389 0 0 25 0 0 77 0 768 215 189 209 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1433 0 0 1754 0 0 1781 0 1869 1836 1617 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 20.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.0 23.7 0.0 5.6 6.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 21.4 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.0 23.7 5.5 5.6 6.5 Prop In Lane 0.88 0.10 0.36 0.28 1.00 0.00 0.04 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 516 0 0 591 0 0 515 0 1099 932 781 766 V/C Ratio(X) 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.70 0.23 0.24 0.27 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 645 0 0 734 0 0 533 0 1099 932 781 766 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 27.4 0.0 0.0 20.3 0.0 0.0 8.8 0.0 11.9 12.5 12.5 12.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 3.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 3.7 0.6 0.7 0.9 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 7.5 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 9.7 2.3 2.1 2.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 31.3 0.0 0.0 20.4 0.0 0.0 9.0 0.0 15.6 13.0 13.2 13.6 LnGrp LOS C A A C AAAABBBB Approach Vol, veh/h 389 25 845 613 Approach Delay, s/veh 31.3 20.4 15.0 13.3 Approach LOS C C B B Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 53.0 29.5 8.6 44.4 29.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 48.5 32.5 5.0 39.0 32.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 25.7 23.4 3.6 8.5 2.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 5.9 1.6 0.0 3.3 0.1 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 17.9 HCM 6th LOS B AM PEAK 2020 PROPOSED LANE CONFIGURATION Synchro 10 Report Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 316 6 36 8 8 6 71 705 2 7 364 192 Future Volume (veh/h) 316 6 36 8 8 6 71 705 2 7 364 192 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 343 7 39 9 9 7 77 766 2 8 396 209 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, %222222222222 Cap, veh/h 465 8 44 223 219 149 99 1096 3 298 894 758 Arrive On Green 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.06 0.59 0.59 0.48 0.48 0.48 Sat Flow, veh/h 1263 26 144 541 722 491 1781 1865 5 700 1870 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 389 0 0 25 0 0 77 0 768 8 396 209 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1433 0 0 1754 0 0 1781 0 1869 700 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 20.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.5 0.0 23.7 0.7 11.6 6.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 21.4 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 3.5 0.0 23.7 15.3 11.6 6.5 Prop In Lane 0.88 0.10 0.36 0.28 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 516 0 0 591 0 0 99 0 1099 298 894 758 V/C Ratio(X) 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.78 0.00 0.70 0.03 0.44 0.28 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 645 0 0 734 0 0 108 0 1099 298 894 758 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 27.4 0.0 0.0 20.3 0.0 0.0 38.5 0.0 11.9 20.4 14.3 13.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 3.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 27.7 0.0 3.7 0.2 1.6 0.9 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 7.5 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 2.3 0.0 9.7 0.1 4.9 2.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 31.3 0.0 0.0 20.4 0.0 0.0 66.2 0.0 15.6 20.6 15.9 13.9 LnGrp LOS C A A C AAEABCBB Approach Vol, veh/h 389 25 845 613 Approach Delay, s/veh 31.3 20.4 20.2 15.2 Approach LOS C C C B Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 53.0 29.5 9.1 43.9 29.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 48.5 32.5 5.0 39.0 32.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 25.7 23.4 5.5 17.3 2.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 5.9 1.6 0.0 3.2 0.1 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 20.9 HCM 6th LOS C AM PEAK 2040 EXISTING CONFIGURATION Synchro 10 Report Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 379 7 44 10 10 7 85 846 2 9 437 231 Future Volume (veh/h) 379 7 44 10 10 7 85 846 2 9 437 231 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 412 8 48 11 11 8 92 920 2 10 475 251 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, %222222222222 Cap, veh/h 515 9 51 255 251 164 118 1026 2 50 1428 685 Arrive On Green 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.07 0.55 0.55 0.43 0.43 0.43 Sat Flow, veh/h 1258 24 147 573 720 470 1781 1866 4 18 3303 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 468 0 0 30 0 0 92 0 922 249 236 251 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1429 0 0 1763 0 0 1781 0 1870 1704 1617 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 27.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.5 0.0 38.6 0.4 8.5 9.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 28.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 4.5 0.0 38.6 28.7 8.5 9.4 Prop In Lane 0.88 0.10 0.37 0.27 1.00 0.00 0.04 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 574 0 0 670 0 0 118 0 1028 779 699 685 V/C Ratio(X) 0.81 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.78 0.00 0.90 0.32 0.34 0.37 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 603 0 0 701 0 0 202 0 1028 779 699 685 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 27.7 0.0 0.0 19.1 0.0 0.0 40.5 0.0 17.6 16.4 16.6 16.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 8.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.5 0.0 12.1 1.1 1.3 1.5 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 10.4 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 2.3 0.0 18.3 3.4 3.3 3.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 35.9 0.0 0.0 19.1 0.0 0.0 51.0 0.0 29.7 17.5 17.9 18.4 LnGrp LOS D AABAADACBBB Approach Vol, veh/h 468 30 1014 736 Approach Delay, s/veh 35.9 19.1 31.7 17.9 Approach LOS D B C B Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 53.0 35.2 10.4 42.6 35.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 48.5 32.5 10.0 34.0 32.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 40.6 30.0 6.5 30.7 3.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 4.1 0.7 0.1 1.3 0.1 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 27.9 HCM 6th LOS C AM PEAK 2040 PROPOSED CONFIGURATION Synchro 10 Report Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 379 7 44 10 10 7 85 846 2 9 437 231 Future Volume (veh/h) 379 7 44 10 10 7 85 846 2 9 437 231 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 412 8 48 11 11 8 92 920 2 10 475 251 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, %222222222222 Cap, veh/h 515 9 51 255 251 164 118 1026 2 149 810 686 Arrive On Green 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.07 0.55 0.55 0.43 0.43 0.43 Sat Flow, veh/h 1258 24 147 573 720 470 1781 1866 4 606 1870 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 468 0 0 30 0 0 92 0 922 10 475 251 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1429 0 0 1763 0 0 1781 0 1870 606 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 27.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.5 0.0 38.6 1.3 17.0 9.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 28.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 4.5 0.0 38.6 29.6 17.0 9.4 Prop In Lane 0.88 0.10 0.37 0.27 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 574 0 0 670 0 0 118 0 1028 149 810 686 V/C Ratio(X) 0.81 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.78 0.00 0.90 0.07 0.59 0.37 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 603 0 0 701 0 0 151 0 1028 149 810 686 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 27.7 0.0 0.0 19.1 0.0 0.0 40.6 0.0 17.6 35.4 19.0 16.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 8.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 17.9 0.0 12.1 0.9 3.1 1.5 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 10.4 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 2.5 0.0 18.3 0.2 7.7 3.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 35.9 0.0 0.0 19.1 0.0 0.0 58.5 0.0 29.7 36.2 22.1 18.4 LnGrp LOS D AABAAEACDCB Approach Vol, veh/h 468 30 1014 736 Approach Delay, s/veh 35.9 19.1 32.3 21.0 Approach LOS D B C C Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 53.0 35.2 10.3 42.7 35.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 48.5 32.5 7.5 36.5 32.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 40.6 30.0 6.5 31.6 3.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 4.1 0.7 0.0 1.8 0.1 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 29.2 HCM 6th LOS C PM PEAK 2020 EXISTING CONFIGURATION Synchro 10 Report Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 248 0 45 11 8 10 49 445 7 5 683 322 Future Volume (veh/h) 248 0 45 11 8 10 49 445 7 5 683 322 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 270 0 49 12 9 11 53 484 8 5 742 350 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, %222222222222 Cap, veh/h 402 0 57 203 153 153 79 1143 19 50 1808 824 Arrive On Green 0.26 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.04 0.62 0.62 0.52 0.52 0.52 Sat Flow, veh/h 1218 0 221 533 593 590 1781 1835 30 5 3477 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 319 0 0 32 0 0 53 0 492 400 347 350 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1439 0 0 1717 0 0 1781 0 1865 1865 1617 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 15.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.2 0.0 10.3 0.0 10.0 10.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 16.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 2.2 0.0 10.3 10.0 10.0 10.4 Prop In Lane 0.85 0.15 0.37 0.34 1.00 0.02 0.01 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 459 0 0 509 0 0 79 0 1162 1018 841 824 V/C Ratio(X) 0.69 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.67 0.00 0.42 0.39 0.41 0.42 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 716 0 0 790 0 0 175 0 1162 1018 841 824 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 26.8 0.0 0.0 21.3 0.0 0.0 35.9 0.0 7.3 11.2 11.2 11.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.9 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 9.5 0.0 1.1 1.1 1.5 1.6 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 5.5 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 3.8 4.0 3.6 3.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 28.7 0.0 0.0 21.4 0.0 0.0 45.4 0.0 8.5 12.3 12.7 12.9 LnGrp LOS C A A C A A D AABBB Approach Vol, veh/h 319 32 545 1097 Approach Delay, s/veh 28.7 21.4 12.1 12.6 Approach LOS C C B B Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 52.0 24.2 7.9 44.1 24.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 47.5 33.5 7.5 35.5 33.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 12.3 18.0 4.2 12.4 3.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 3.5 1.7 0.0 6.4 0.1 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 15.2 HCM 6th LOS B PM PEAK 2020 PROPOSED LANE CONFIGURATION Synchro 10 Report Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 248 0 45 11 8 10 49 445 7 5 683 322 Future Volume (veh/h) 248 0 45 11 8 10 49 445 7 5 683 322 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 270 0 49 12 9 11 53 484 8 5 742 350 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, %222222222222 Cap, veh/h 402 0 57 203 153 153 79 1143 19 536 973 824 Arrive On Green 0.26 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.04 0.62 0.62 0.52 0.52 0.52 Sat Flow, veh/h 1218 0 221 533 593 590 1781 1835 30 905 1870 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 319 0 0 32 0 0 53 0 492 5 742 350 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1439 0 0 1717 0 0 1781 0 1865 905 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 15.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.2 0.0 10.3 0.2 24.1 10.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 16.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 2.2 0.0 10.3 2.6 24.1 10.4 Prop In Lane 0.85 0.15 0.37 0.34 1.00 0.02 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 459 0 0 509 0 0 79 0 1162 536 973 824 V/C Ratio(X) 0.69 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.67 0.00 0.42 0.01 0.76 0.42 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 716 0 0 790 0 0 175 0 1162 536 973 824 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 26.8 0.0 0.0 21.3 0.0 0.0 35.9 0.0 7.3 10.0 14.6 11.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.9 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 9.5 0.0 1.1 0.0 5.7 1.6 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 5.5 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 3.8 0.0 10.5 3.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 28.7 0.0 0.0 21.4 0.0 0.0 45.4 0.0 8.5 10.1 20.2 12.9 LnGrp LOS C A A C A A D A A B C B Approach Vol, veh/h 319 32 545 1097 Approach Delay, s/veh 28.7 21.4 12.1 17.8 Approach LOS C C B B Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 52.0 24.2 7.9 44.1 24.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 47.5 33.5 7.5 35.5 33.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 12.3 18.0 4.2 26.1 3.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 3.5 1.7 0.0 4.5 0.1 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 18.0 HCM 6th LOS B PM PEAK 2040 EXISTING CONFIGURATION Synchro 10 Report Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 297 0 54 14 10 12 59 534 9 6 820 387 Future Volume (veh/h) 297 0 54 14 10 12 59 534 9 6 820 387 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 323 0 59 15 11 13 64 580 10 7 891 421 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, %222222222222 Cap, veh/h 446 0 66 233 172 172 84 1079 19 49 1686 770 Arrive On Green 0.30 0.00 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.05 0.59 0.59 0.49 0.49 0.49 Sat Flow, veh/h 1213 0 222 571 574 573 1781 1833 32 7 3472 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 382 0 0 39 0 0 64 0 590 481 417 421 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1434 0 0 1718 0 0 1781 0 1865 1862 1617 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 19.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9 0.0 15.4 0.0 14.4 15.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 20.4 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.0 2.9 0.0 15.4 14.4 14.4 15.0 Prop In Lane 0.85 0.15 0.38 0.33 1.00 0.02 0.01 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 513 0 0 577 0 0 84 0 1097 949 785 770 V/C Ratio(X) 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.76 0.00 0.54 0.51 0.53 0.55 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 675 0 0 755 0 0 166 0 1097 949 785 770 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 26.8 0.0 0.0 20.2 0.0 0.0 38.0 0.0 10.0 14.4 14.4 14.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 3.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.1 0.0 1.9 1.9 2.6 2.8 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 7.1 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.0 6.1 6.1 5.4 5.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 30.0 0.0 0.0 20.3 0.0 0.0 51.2 0.0 11.9 16.3 17.0 17.3 LnGrp LOS C A A C A A D ABBBB Approach Vol, veh/h 382 39 654 1319 Approach Delay, s/veh 30.0 20.3 15.7 16.8 Approach LOS C C B B Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 52.0 28.7 8.3 43.7 28.7 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 47.5 33.5 7.5 35.5 33.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 17.4 22.4 4.9 17.0 3.3 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 4.4 1.8 0.0 7.3 0.2 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 18.7 HCM 6th LOS B PM PEAK 2040 PROPOSED CONFIGURATION Synchro 10 Report Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 297 0 54 14 10 12 59 534 9 6 820 387 Future Volume (veh/h) 297 0 54 14 10 12 59 534 9 6 820 387 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 323 0 59 15 11 13 64 580 10 7 891 421 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, %222222222222 Cap, veh/h 391 0 58 207 153 152 82 1171 20 470 1015 860 Arrive On Green 0.26 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.05 0.64 0.64 0.54 0.54 0.54 Sat Flow, veh/h 1217 0 222 581 586 583 1781 1833 32 826 1870 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 382 0 0 39 0 0 64 0 590 7 891 421 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1439 0 0 1750 0 0 1781 0 1865 826 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 22.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.2 0.0 15.0 0.4 37.4 14.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 23.5 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 3.2 0.0 15.0 6.8 37.4 14.9 Prop In Lane 0.85 0.15 0.38 0.33 1.00 0.02 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 449 0 0 512 0 0 82 0 1191 470 1015 860 V/C Ratio(X) 0.85 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.78 0.00 0.50 0.01 0.88 0.49 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 449 0 0 512 0 0 101 0 1191 470 1015 860 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 33.3 0.0 0.0 25.1 0.0 0.0 42.5 0.0 8.6 12.7 18.0 12.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 14.3 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 26.1 0.0 1.5 0.1 10.7 2.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 9.9 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 5.8 0.1 17.6 5.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 47.6 0.0 0.0 25.2 0.0 0.0 68.6 0.0 10.1 12.7 28.6 14.8 LnGrp LOS D A A C AAEABBCB Approach Vol, veh/h 382 39 654 1319 Approach Delay, s/veh 47.6 25.2 15.8 24.1 Approach LOS D C B C Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 62.0 28.0 8.6 53.4 28.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 57.5 23.5 5.1 47.9 23.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 17.0 25.5 5.2 39.4 3.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 4.6 0.0 0.0 5.1 0.1 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 25.6 HCM 6th LOS C 8 Bureau of Economics and Business Research, Florida Population Stuides, Bulletin 183 Projections of Florida Population by County, 2020–2045, with Estimates for 2018 (continued) County Estimates Projections, April 1 and State April 1, 2018 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 MIAMI-DADE 2,779,322 Low 2,743,000 2,830,000 2,889,800 2,926,300 2,950,700 2,955,700 Medium 2,861,600 3,040,300 3,190,200 3,315,900 3,427,200 3,523,500 High 2,971,500 3,230,900 3,478,000 3,706,300 3,926,700 4,127,200 MONROE 73,940 Low 71,000 69,300 67,500 65,700 63,900 62,100 Medium 74,000 74,200 74,300 74,400 74,600 74,700 High 77,000 79,300 81,700 84,100 86,200 88,200 NASSAU 82,748 Low 81,100 85,300 88,300 90,500 91,300 91,300 Medium 86,400 94,800 102,100 108,600 113,900 118,600 High 91,400 103,200 114,700 126,400 136,800 147,100 OKALOOSA 198,152 Low 192,200 194,300 195,200 194,700 193,300 191,400 Medium 202,600 212,100 220,400 227,400 233,400 239,100 High 212,500 228,800 245,000 260,800 275,300 290,200 OKEECHOBEE 41,120 Low 39,900 39,600 39,100 38,600 38,000 37,400 Medium 41,500 42,400 43,100 43,600 44,200 44,700 High 43,200 45,300 47,400 49,400 51,300 53,200 ORANGE 1,349,597 Low 1,341,400 1,433,400 1,498,900 1,543,400 1,575,400 1,595,500 Medium 1,415,500 1,568,100 1,694,000 1,799,300 1,891,800 1,975,300 High 1,482,700 1,679,100 1,862,600 2,032,000 2,195,700 2,352,400 OSCEOLA 352,496 Low 356,500 399,500 432,200 457,100 476,700 491,000 Medium 380,700 445,300 500,200 548,100 591,000 630,400 High 402,000 480,300 554,900 626,300 697,100 766,400 PALM BEACH 1,433,417 Low 1,412,800 1,455,100 1,486,500 1,507,200 1,517,500 1,518,000 Medium 1,473,700 1,563,100 1,641,000 1,707,500 1,763,200 1,811,000 High 1,530,500 1,661,200 1,789,100 1,908,900 2,019,400 2,119,700 PASCO 515,077 Low 512,100 539,100 562,000 578,700 590,700 599,300 Medium 534,500 579,400 619,900 654,000 682,900 708,900 High 554,800 615,400 676,400 733,000 786,100 836,800 PINELLAS 970,532 Low 953,700 960,700 960,700 955,800 947,600 938,300 Medium 983,900 1,012,900 1,034,300 1,050,600 1,063,500 1,075,000 High 1,012,700 1,068,000 1,118,000 1,161,800 1,200,600 1,236,600 POLK 673,028 Low 670,300 706,100 732,300 751,200 764,300 773,000 Medium 699,600 758,900 807,900 849,400 884,700 916,200 High 726,100 806,200 881,300 951,400 1,017,100 1,079,400 PUTNAM 72,981 Low 70,200 68,300 66,600 64,800 63,000 61,200 Medium 73,100 73,200 73,300 73,400 73,500 73,600 High 76,000 78,300 80,600 83,000 85,000 87,000 ST. JOHNS 238,742 Low 239,900 265,600 284,600 298,700 309,600 317,100 Medium 256,100 295,900 329,500 358,600 384,600 408,500 High 270,500 319,300 365,400 409,300 452,700 495,000 ST. LUCIE 302,432 Low 300,000 314,100 325,800 335,100 341,600 346,600 Medium 313,100 337,500 359,500 378,700 395,100 410,100 High 325,000 358,500 392,100 424,400 454,600 484,000 2012 FDOT QUALITY/LEVEL OF SERVICE HANDBOOK TABLES TABLE 7 Generalized Peak Hour Directional Volumes for Florida’s Urbanized Areas1 12/18/12 INTERRUPTED FLOW FACILITIES UNINTERRUPTED FLOW FACILITIES Non-State Signalized Roadway Adjustments (Alter corresponding state volumes by the indicated percent.) Non-State Signalized Roadways -10% STATE SIGNALIZED ARTERIALS Class I (40 mph or higher posted speed limit) Lanes Median B C D E 1 Undivided *830 880 ** 2 Divided *1,910 2,000 ** 3 Divided *2,940 3,020 ** 4 Divided *3,970 4,040 ** Class II (35 mph or slower posted speed limit) Lanes Median B C D E 1 Undivided *370 750 800 2 Divided *730 1,630 1,700 3 Divided *1,170 2,520 2,560 4 Divided *1,610 3,390 3,420 Freeway Adjustments Auxiliary Lane Ramp Metering + 1,000 + 5% FREEWAYS Lanes B C D E 2 2,260 3,020 3,660 3,940 3 3,360 4,580 5,500 6,080 4 4,500 6,080 7,320 8,220 5 5,660 7,680 9,220 10,360 6 7,900 10,320 12,060 12,500 Median & Turn Lane Adjustments Lanes Median Exclusive Left Lanes Exclusive Right Lanes Adjustment Factors 1 Divided Yes No +5% 1 Undivided No No -20% Multi Undivided Yes No -5% Multi Undivided No No -25% –––Yes + 5% One-Way Facility Adjustment Multiply the corresponding directional volumes in this table by 1.2 UNINTERRUPTED FLOW HIGHWAYS Lanes Median B C D E 1 Undivided 420 840 1,190 1,640 2 Divided 1,810 2,560 3,240 3,590 3 Divided 2,720 3,840 4,860 5,380 Uninterrupted Flow Highway Adjustments Lanes Median Exclusive left lanes Adjustment factors 1 Divided Yes +5% Multi Undivided Yes -5% Multi Undivided No -25% BICYCLE MODE2 (Multiply motorized vehicle volumes shown below by number of directional roadway lanes to determine two-way maximum service volumes.) Paved Shoulder/Bicycle Lane Coverage B C D E 0-49%*150 390 1,000 50-84%110 340 1,000 >1,000 85-100%470 1,000 >1,000 ** PEDESTRIAN MODE 2 (Multiply motorized vehicle volumes shown below by number of directional roadway lanes to determine two-way maximum service volumes.) Sidewalk Coverage B C D E 0-49%**140 480 50-84%*80 440 800 85-100%200 540 880 >1,000 BUS MODE (Scheduled Fixed Route) 3 (Buses in peak hour in peak direction) Sidewalk Coverage B C D E 0-84%> 5 ≥ 4 ≥ 3 ≥ 2 85-100%> 4 ≥ 3 ≥ 2 ≥ 1 1Values shown are presented as peak hour directionalvolumes for levels of service and are for the automobile/truck modes unless specifically stated. This table does not constitute a standard and should be used only for general planning applications. The computer models from which this table is derived should be used for more specific planning applications. The table and deriving computer models should not be used for corridor or intersection design, where more refined techniques exist. Calculations are based on planning applications of the Highway Capacity Manual and the Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual. 2Level of service for the bicycle and pedestrian modes in this table is based on number of motorized vehicles, not number of bicyclists or pedestrians using the facility. 3Buses per hour shown are only for the peak hour in the single direction of the higher traffic flow. * Cannot be achieved using table input value defaults. ** Not applicable for that level of service letter grade.For the automobile mode, volumes greater than level of service D become F because intersection capacities have been reached. For the bicycle mode, the level of service letter grade (including F) is not achievable because there is no maximum vehicle volume threshold using table input value defaults. Source: Florida Department of Transportation Systems Planning Officewww.dot.state.fl.us/planning/systems/sm/los/default.shtm Page 13 179 APPENDIX D: CONCEPT PLAN BELLEAIR ROAD TO LAKEVIEW ROAD A concept plan was drawn for the road diet portion along Segment 1A from Belleair Road to Belleview Boulevard, and extended out to Lakeview Road. With the road diet, median islands are proposed in the center lane where left turn access is not needed in order to provide a traffic calming effect and increase safety. The median islands are extended to Lakeview Road. A median refuge island is proposed on Lakeview Road east of the corridor where the Pinellas Trail crosses the road midblock. While outside the official study area, providing a median refuge island on Lakeview Road at the Pinellas Trail crossing would improve the experience on the Pinellas Trail as it serves as a parallel bike facility for Ft. Harrison Avenue. N.T.S