FLD2004-06044
I'
'..
,
';'
Oct 25,2004
Dear Board Members.
'j <
Please review the folioing application We would like
to terminate the non-conforming status of the property,
allowmg us to build an attached garage for our tenants.
As discussed in our last meeting We down-sized the
addition from a 3 car to a 2 car garage Also we added
partitions to separate t,he two, each having their own pull
down ladders for access to the storage above.
We also added the laundary area on the porch for the
tenants On the revised drawing we show the actual finish
that Will be on the exterior of the garage (The bottom will
be block, to match the eXisting structure The top portion
Will be hardl-plank lap siding)
Once again the Clearwater Planning Department has
carefully reviewed the plans submitted They have recom-
mended approval. We also urge the Board to follow the
staffs recommendations
Thank You
David & Sharon Cote
~."
if
PtAI\iJ\jII; -' ~ ~'t .l...t ./Pl.! l''' vCS
( I ry 1)1 ClLA~V~A '1' R ;:)
.
~
>-
'{:'-4:...
Planning Dfii..'2Iilment
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone 727~562-4567
Fax 727-562-4865
CAS I: ff::
DATE RECEIVED
RECEIVED BY (staff Initials)
ATLAS PAGE #
ZONING DISTRICT
LAND USE CLASSIFICATION
SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT
PROPERTIES.
NORTH
SOUTH
WEST
EAST
...
o
IJ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
tJ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION IncludIng
1) collated. 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of sHe plans
o SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $
'" NOTE 14 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED
(APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS)
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
Residential Ioml Project (ReVIsed 2102/2004)
-PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT"",
A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
APPLICANT NAME D a \J i A ,J.. S h.n. r() n C..{1+ e
MAILING ADDRESS \ \ \ n \( to~\1 ~+n("\~ J) r r kc.. (u.:x:.Ae.... t= I 3.6') 55
PHONENUMBER ld./- L\SS -d\~O FAX NUMBER ,ai- L{~\-\101...\9- (",\\ l'i.'{
PROPERTY OWNER(S)
(Must Include ALL owners)
PHONE NUMBER
FAX NUMBER
AGENT NAME
MAILING ADDRESS
CELL NUMBER
E-MAIL ADDRESS
B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION' (Code Section 4-202.A)
STREET ADDRESS \\5 (\ Ke'{ ~y\-ahe Dr- C. \(",Qfv..):...-\-C'r .f\ 5 S jS5
() \\ II
lEGAL DESCRIPTION 'he ~\ ~ S \. \1) \='t (1~ \0-\- l, \I")\uc...\<-- D - \<(<''iSt-al'\e mC\I"\O
PARCEL NUMBER \ L4. "dC\ \S 4: ~ s I..ol.ot() 4.DciCO / I ~a'<l t OS 4~ S(Plo D64 0010: oL
, . J Lc.ndSi I
PARCEL SIZE ~ Ft- l\5~ t:\c..<;;e. Ares.1 ~\ ~r;:-t ~n porcn 1511 by 13
~, square feet) 11Jt:> I
PROPOSED USErS) AND SIZE(S) d - - -+
(number of dwelling units, notel rooms or square foota
- I')ESCRIPTlON OF REQUEST(S)
er-Yn\ G....\.-<Ol", ~ 0\= n Dr L'"
(lnelude all requested code deViations, e 9 reduction In reqUired number of parking spaces, speCific sa, ete )
Page 1 of 7 - FleXible Development ResJdentlallnfill Application - City of Clearwater
.... ~~:.4
DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE T~SFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TOR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT. OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PlAN? YES _ NO _ (If yes, attach a copy of the applicable
documents )
C, PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5)
o SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED OR AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING TO THE OWNERSHIP OF THE PROPERTY
D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS' (Code Section 3-913.A)
o Provide complete responses to the SIX (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain ~ each cntena IS achIeved, In detail
1 The proposed development of the land WlII be In harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, denSIty and character of adjacent properties In which II
~~ed _~
C')hP eo l\...,p ~-\\-\~"\ S C (;)IN\ \)\e..\-e. ----r\-e e(\~r'f' ~C'\me u')'\\ \ ~'::. {'(" ra-'(\.t~
o.,<,~ u. ')~\\ \nc..UQ. q (\ &-v.J ("~. \'n€>le~rE' \n\pr\c\:..n5 \'('\ q-::. I~
~~ '\\ h
~\Je ~ rc..~es,
2 The proposed development Will not hInder or discourage the appropt1ate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly
Impair the value thereof
,0,-\-~ ~Q ~~\\-\Or. ~\c., Lo..)'~\\ ;V"""\<:"nOc~t'> ~ \Jc.\ue a+\~\JIl"ClPO(\J.
~ceG,<e \ n UPc.~;"S \JC..\\I <> \ r-. ~ S-,{ ro, ",do n~ ~1'of'e.-\,eS
~~::;;~~Sfe7~=;:i5{:~~~~~~ ~~~~~-\
~ \?a, 'C"'\ I \ - '(Q,s 0- Jg')-t....i' . \f'l W -\ er,Jrl.~J
\,~ Y'\~ ~cl~c.\- -\-O,\"e. e.. ~ "enof'.
4 The proposed development IS designed to minimiZe traffic congestion
""
5
~~,e..
~\CL.\<- D.(: C.,.,ro v F
6 The design of the proposed development minimiZeS adverse effects, including Visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation Impacts,
on adjacent propertl.." ~ C \- \" \
\ ~ O",s...~uL ,Or- \Yn-e l~'\\\\ 'De- VYI~h-'mll\ \
\.J0.....\..\ 'ce \(Pp-\ \\~Q+ ~ C\eQ..Y"' ~U-rIr\J. On.Ce'" CorYlple-te...
L-c. ~ 'See 0il\.) G..n cl \ re e ~ Lo-;\ \ \ "0 e Q~~d.\ N c:: 'oe<!..l,.)\-";, ~ \
ec....f'C..'0Le'
12..,,", d
"""c
'"
"
Page 2 of 7 - FleXible Development Resldentlallnfill ApphcatlQn - City of Clearwater
(J Provide complete responses to the seven (7) RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECT CRITERIA - explain how each crtterla Is achieved, In detail
The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development Is othelWlse Impracbcal WIthout deviations from the Intensity and
development standards
~ , I 0 (
I~t' .<)ef bCte./C. yed.x...J.;a" if> to ,qllo." ~ 3Crt"c.~e fo ht" ~iLJ j I'\. \)PP+hl ,~+al c..\\Ol4.Jor'j ;-or (10
'Se.\-'nC.~~"'hH. Ve~.dp<:"1(H\:......J ~It\s~de. l,l )\\"ho<~ r-P~ue:itOl"'\ ~.<;". \.l')cul~ hl" iwtrrc.("~,cC{.\
~C'" "\\...p q<::l.l""c'Je. \.a}Ou\A ~c..ue -\O~e \5 \h \\0,*"" ~r c. .s.\.c.~c.rJ \J~hl'r~ ..k, pa(1L \l1\\J ~eJ
. J ( . I (
~~...~ p~~~ 1(00 need ;;l."\. lJJ'\-'-1 ~t bcty rpJud'i~'" ~,~ l.dl\\ ,c;-\-l\\ \ ee.ve \45 (!I~
0.."'4 aO' s6bcta. \~~V'l'\q 3S ~-\<4\ ~,. ~e i)rwev,JaN .
2 The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential Inllll project wllf not matenally reduce the fair mar14t value of
abutting properties (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site WIth the Improvements)
~e c..u('("~ 1"\+ 'f'f\t'.c'(p4. \.b..\L1~ l~ \ l~ Y\ \<~ \{~ne
V~( ~()~Y'Ctc;;.~\ ',..... ~I.Y'\~)' l4JI~\n \~e r-\JJ"\ \..\01'"'\ -y~ 'S
~~ e ~
~\-~c..ve. ~ \~\'S ,-\eCf". ~'X '. \\o4~ <craves-\- S~
3 The uses within the residentiallnfill project are otherwise permitted 10 the City of Clearwater
(Y\ O~..\ ~ ''''e ~ ~tnPs.. ("") n ~\~ S\- '\~Q.~ Cnd
CV"p c... I 'n ~ve ~~_~e..cl
n-u
\d,D\~
\n<:"'~
f\~
1
(~~{. Ie 0 e.5
SUfrOUf'cl.'iI"..C
)
4 The uses or mIX of use within the resrdentlallnfili project are compahble WIth adjacent land uses
~\'nE' l'" D \J p\e tiS <-"")V'\ \~~ ~ Sc- h-t {'O ~ \~ c.,k
5 The development of the parcel proposed for development as a resrdentlalmfill project WIll upgrade th
proposed for development
\ A~,V~
,"",-'f' r-.r-ope\~". ~e.fe ~re '\f"'C-(e~~. r\ ~~0e ',,,, ""\-"e
~ , -~
S""I( ('" ~I..)("\ ~tC\..) ? r~ ~(? r\-'~ ~ .
6 The deSign of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the Immediate
vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole
~e.... N.d~'\,D\"'\ -l"::> ~es.~t'("\e.1. ~ '-c\CL~J. \n '--.L"')\-\-y-,. \'vW
~ ",~~~~;:~ ;Q;~~:::'-' :~~ ~ et~~:: ;~~:Qr:~::::.~ <\ J
7 FleXibility In regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole
\='\e~-\'b~ \, \-~ "If'"\. -\'he,. Sf>A-\oc'l' 'L-:::. Q-{ e -\.'!Y\.~(')r~~ I ~(" <'\D+ {j('\\,-)
i)e~~ -\,^- \~P ~C.(C~~ Y1\-,\- ~ b\'l"I'\c\";.~J \r-. I....)\\-\"\ -\-~~ .Q~'~\~f'\~
'\c)\J\\~;'~
Page 3 of 7 - FleXIble Development Resldentl6llnfill Application - City of Clearwater
COMMUNITY DEVELOPME~ CODE
, ~. . PLANNJf-.4G & OEVE OPMENT SVCS
B. structure wluch ~ lEA ,;
it"'I
res ct to dellB1ty may be reconstructed on the , .
same parcel with the ssme density provided such
reconstruction complies with all other reqUIre-
ments of tlus Commumty Development Code.
f'C"'lleveJ two approval shall not be granted to
te~;te status as a nonconformmg use or struc-
ture unless the nonconfomuty is rmproved accord-
mg to the fodowing reqUll"ements
J 6-107
.
.
"
t1al improvement to, addItion to, or change In the
pnnclpal use or structure on the property 18
proposed and approved
.
.
Section 6-108. Nonconforming access fea.
tures.
A. Permitted ac..ess connections in place- as
the date of adoption of this development code that
do not conform. with, the standards In Article 3
DlVlsion 1 shall be designated liS nonconforming
access features '"and shall be brought into compli-
ance with applicablE! standards under the follow-
ing conditions:
1 When new access connectIon permits are
requested.
2. Substantial enlargements or improve-
ments;
3
4
AB roadway improvements allow
B. If the pnnclpal actIvity on a property With
nonconfomung access features IS dIsconttnued for
a consecutive penod of 180 days, or discontinued
for any period of time without the present mten-
tion of resuzmng that actIvity, then that property
must thereafter be brought mto conformIty with
all apphcable connectIOn spaclOg and deSign re-
qwrements, unless otherwise exempted through
a level one or level two approval. For uses that are
vacant or dIscontroued upon the effective date of
this development code, the one hundred eighty
(180) day penod begins on the date of adoption of
this development code.
-> Section 6-109. Termination of status as a
'-... nonconformity. __/
_____ oR':...."
f"'A)A nonconformmg use or structure may be
d~ed to be In confornuty With thiS development
code, and may thereafter be allowed to contmue
and to expand as a lawfully eXlstIng use or
~tructure, If such use or'structure IS granted level
10 approval In accordance With the prOVISIOns of
this section
Supp No 6
CD66
x
4f)
Off-street parkIng lots shall be improved
to meet the landscaping standards estab-
lished in section 3-1202(D).
t
x
Section 6-110. Nonconformities created &8 a
result of eminent domain.
A. In the event that an emment domam action
creates a nonconformmg structure, BUch noncon-
forming structure may remam as a legal noncon-
fOrmlng structure provided that all other regula-
tions of thIS Code regardlng nonconformmg
Structures are met Tlus section shall not be
applicable to sll1gle-family detached and attached
dwellmgs
B In the event that an emment domam actIon
renders a Bite nonconfornung W1 th respect to the
developmen t standards of tlus C<- de, the property
shall be requU"ed to comply With the development
standards to the maximum degree phYSically and
financIally feasible as determmed by the commu-
nity ..a~velopment\ coordmator The com.mumty
development coo;dinator may reqwre mltIgab.on
and/or improvements to the SIte that are related
to the specIfic conditIOns of the Site, that ade-
"
..
':
GENERAL ENGINEERING:
....
.
In reference to the 4ft. public sldewalk along Keystone Dr.
and Grove St. The current property was appraised at 120K
(in 2003). The addition is expected to cost aprox. 20-22K.
Therefore the addition will be under the 25% of property
value, and will not be required to be put in at thlS time.
There are no existing sidewalks in the surroundlng neighborhood.
,
..
d~(1.'\()r--
Sharon Cote
( ( vy:=Q
-
~
"
.-
.
'.~
..
,~
,'1".,.."
," .
'"
.,'
\:-{;;......
"~
E. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A)
~ SIGNE D AND SEALED SURVEY Oncludlng legal descnpllon of property) - One original and 14 copies,
cs./ TREE SURVEY (Indudlng existing trees on site and Within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, slle (DBH 4" or greater), and location,
Including drip lines and Indicating trees to be removed),
&'" LOCATIDN MAP OF THE PROPERTY,
~ PARKING DEMAND STUDY In conjunction with a request to make deViations to the parking standards (Ie Reduce number of spaces) Prior to
the submittal of thIs application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be In
accordance With accepted traffic englneenng pnnClples The flndlngs of the study will be used In deterrrunlng whether or not deviations to the
parldng standards are approved.
't1
GRADING PlAN, as applicable,
'ill PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note BUilding perrmts Will not be ISSUed until evidence of recording a flnal plat is provided),
~ COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable,
F. SITE PlAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202 A)
[J SITE PlAN with the follOWIng information (not to exceed 24" x 36')
-:./' All dimenSions,
L North arrow;
..y. Englneenng bar scale (minimum scale one Inch equats 50 feel), and date prepared.
..,/' location map,
"""'" Index sheet referencmg individual sheets Included In package,
,/'" Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures,
JL" Footprint and size of a]1 PROPOSED bUildIngs and structures,
~ All reqUired setbacks,
JL"' AIr eXIsting and proposed pomts of access,
j,f All requIred sight tnangles,
':l!.!9. IdeRtJficatlon of environmentally umque areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and speclmen
trees, Including descnptJon and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and Wildlife habitats, etc,
Location of all public and pnvate easements,
Location of all street rights-of-way Wlltlln and adjacent to the Site,
LocatIon of eXlsllng public and private utllibes, Including fire hydrants, stann and sanitary sewer lines. manholes and lift statlons, gas
and water lines,
All parillng spaces, dnveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas,
DepIction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot Inlenor landscaped areas,
Location of all solid waste containers. recycling or trash handling areas and outSide mechanical equipment and all required screening {per
Section 3-201 (DXI) and Index #701},
Location of all landscape material,
LocatlOn of all onslte and oftstte stann-water management facll!bes,
Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures, and
Location of all eXIsting and proposed sidewalks
v
~
~
~
.....v
.:".L
~
...v-
...........
l).J.e
'"
D
I:J SITE DATA TABLE for eXIsting, required, and proposed development, In wntlenltabular form
~ Land area in square feel and acres,
~ Number of EXISTI NG dwelling units,
~ Number of PROPOSED dwellmg units,
~ Gross floor area devoted to each use,
V' Paoong spaces total number, presented m tabular form WIth the number of required spaces,
~ Total paved area, mcludmg all paved parking spaces and dnveways, expressed In square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area,
v Size and species of all landscape materIal,
~ OffiCial records book and page numbers of all eXISting utility easement,
~ Building and structure heIghts,
v Impermeable surface ratio (I S R j, and
~ Floor area ratio (F A R ) for all nonresidential uses
[J REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 Yo X 11) and color rendenng If possible,
o FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, prOVide the follOWing additional Information on site plan
~ One-foot contours or spot elevations on slle,
Offslte elevations If reqUired to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the pareet,
All open space areas,
Location of all earth or water retamlng walls and earth berms,
Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned),
Streets and drives (dImensioned),
Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned),
Structural overhangs,
Tree Inventory, prepared by a "cer!lfied arbonst", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting Size, canopy (dnp lines) and condition of such trees
Page 4 of 7 - FleXIble Development Resldentlallnfill Application - City of Clearwater
G.
STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Design Criteria Manual and
4-202.A.21)
f)1'A
IJ
IJ
1:1
STORMWATER PLAN Including the following requirements
Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines,
Proposed grading IncludIng finished floor elevations of all structures,
All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems,
Proposed slormwater detention/retention area Including top of bank. toe of slope and outlet control structure,
Stormwater calculations for attenuation and water quality,
Signature of Aorlda registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations
COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMiT SUBMITTAL
(SWFWMD approval Is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), If applicable
COPY OF STATE AND COUNTY STORMWATER SYSTEM TIE-IN PERMIT APPLICATIONS, If appIJcable
LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A)
H.
IJ
v'
V
~
v
~
v-
.Y'
..,/
y/
v
.,/
..........
a
1:1
a
LANDSCAPE PLAN
All existing and proposed structures,
Names of abulling streets.
Drainage and retention areas Including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations,
Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers,
Sight visibility lnangles,
Oellnealton and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping Islands and curbing, L
Proposed and reqUired parking spaces, CITY OF ClEAPVVA TEA
Existing trees on-srte and Immediately adjacent to the Site, by species, size and locations, lncludll'ig'ttr1ll1frTEf,
Location, size, descnptlon, specifications and quantities of all eXIsting and proposed landscape matenals, including botanical and
common names,
Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including Instructions, sod mixes, backfilling. mulching and
protective measures,
Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and mtenor landscape coverage, expressing In both square feet and
percentage covered,
Conditions of a prevIOUS development approval (e g conditions Imposed by the Community Development Board),
Imgatlon notes
REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 'h X 11) (color rendering If possible),
IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval),
COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM applicatIon, as applicable
I.
~
IS'
BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS (Section 4-202 A.23)
RequIred In the event the application Includes a development where design standards are in Issue (e g Tourist and Downtown Dlstncls) or as
part of a Comprehensive lnfill Redevelopment Project Of a ReSldenhallnfill Project
BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all bUildings Includmg height dimensions, colors and matenals,
REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four Sides of bUilding with colors and materials to scale (8 Yz X 11) (black and white and color
rendenng, If possible) as reqUired
J. SIGNAGE. (DiviSion 19. SIGNS I Section 3-1806)
t\)A
C) All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs, ProVide photographs and dimenSIons (area, height, etc), Indicate whether they Will be
removed or to remain
o All PROPOSED freestandmg and attached signs, ProVide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing
o Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate appllcatton and fee reqUired)
J Reduced slgnage proposal (8 Yo X 11) (color). If submlttmg ComprehenSive Sign Program application
Page 5 of 7 - FleXible Development Resldentl8llnfill Application - City of Clearwater
.
K.
TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY.
.:tlon 4..s01.C)
I
o
Include as requIred .f proposed development will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted to the ComprehensIVe
Plan Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the IllStlMe of Transportallon EngIneer's Tnp General Manual Refer to
Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for excepllons to this reqUIrement
L. SIGNATURE:
I, the undersigned, acknowledge thai ell representations made In this
application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and
authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property
descnbeeJ In this apptleatlon
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELlAS 1t"""16.
S~ )~_ 9fId subscnbed before me thls:..J day of
~~, AD 20,Q!{" to me and/or by
, Who IS Cllersonally kno~has
produced as
Idenllfi cation
~\v..{)(\ ~
Signa property owner or represen va
o
ocr 27 2004
Page 6 of 7 - FleXible Development Resldentlallnfill Application - City of Clearwater
M. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT:
f
-C;o.. " "6 c..o \e
(Names of all property owners)
c..V"\.~
~ "'C". .. (') r'\
(' ......\.-e.....
1 That (I am~ the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the followlng described property (address or generallocatton)
\ \ 5 '(\ \-<e"{s.~. \) r
C\-ec... If\...\. "Ie.'\'p ( '\='L ~"5" S- <;
2 That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a (descnbe request)
~\\-c. C' \;-..p A. C~ c... ..r C'.... ~ e
3 That the undersigned (has/have) appomted and (does/do) appoint
as (his/their) agenl(s) to execute any petitIOns or other documents necessary to affect such petition,
4 That thIS affidaVit has been executed to Induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above descnbed property.
5 That site viSitS to the property are necessary by City representatives In order 10 process this application and the owner authonzes City
......-'" >is. am _the""""",,, _bed ,n h. appl,,,,,,,", B.~a
6 That (I/we), the undersIgned authority, hereby certify that the foregOing IS true eel
y
p~~Owner ~
Y e, t lJ f"'\
Prope Owner
COUNTY OF PlNELlAS
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Be~ re me the underslQ.n~d. an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Flonda, on thiS / .s7^- day of
, ).00-1 personally appeared -t-\-.- Q bo~ who having been first duly sworn
eposes a contents of the affidaVit that he/she sl~ned ~
~.\.-:&'ftt.<<"_ Karen o. Ruiz __
~'j~ "t COmrlUSSIOn # 00293395
:* :E ~ es March 30 2008 Notary PubliC
My Co '., ~~'aIn ll\sINlCll ~ ~D F ~ Il.:J ~w l""\ -t~ n--.. e
S"\Plannmg DaparlmenMpplrcatlQn Formsldevelopment revleWl2003 FORMSlresldentlal rnfjJl applicatIon 2003 doc
Pl
II ME'
cnv or ClEAR\lVA TER
Page 7 of 7 - FleXible Development ReSldentlallnfill ApplicatIOn - City of Clearwater
i'"::l.
o\,.)(
V\O'N\e.
c....\-
\\\
'(\ ""'ti~~l'"\e ~r, ~\1..0. We
'flu ("c'N:-csed
i 'f"'.,
\; \--. \ S \ ":> 01...:' r \--. \J 'CY\. e.
\CCe...:) o.-\- \ \ \ 1"\ \<e,\cs~c
Co \ 1...0. A s "\ \) \j Q..c.. '"
~e e. \..J....) e \\c.. v e mod e..
'\Y\c..'~'\.,\ \m,oro V eme ~\~'S
~:-= ~
-- ~
.:....
Y'Df' OSe.-d
\)e. ve\o~men+
S\ \e..
rcc"'-+ :lo.("d ~C.ir'\C)
G<" o'l e..
~ F<""on+ c.=;,de.
~ e. '\ CS~e..
.....
\- o..C;~
t-\O~\ \-(""O~-\-
\=' c.. c--\ nj G:, c 0 V~
PLANNI ~
crT" O~ ClEAPW~TEA
,r
~ Cc..c..,\C. Si de
Grave...
~~(\I
I:::' ~ ,0 ~oS e d
\)e veto~\Y'Ie("\ +
'5', \-e..
J r=::- . ..
~-.
-1:-..
-.... - - ----
....
.. -
.-"
..-.....
....... ~ ,..-.
-- - ~ -'~
~
... -- ----.~
- -.~. ~
- -
"-
..a...----._
-n'\i~ Rod.~-t'OC"- lAjc....S:. clone.. '\,(""\ \0- Dd.. Locc.-\ec'. ~ ~\Clc..,~ 50lyt'n
of QU, (f'.Df'o'Sed develCl\'m."+- C \'-'tal \-\c.nlC..c> S-\-, C-Iec.rwo.-\€'r ~'155)
~'1
-., --1. ,.
--
_:1.~--
~~2:--
.....,.-
'"
..J
,\-...\ ~ f\d~ \ -\-1.0\""\ lv...Jc...s do'0e.- 1...0 - (:) ~, L-OQ.C..-\ed', d ~ \0 c.-.'C. (\ D'\+'r\
of O\J~ ~roroseJ d.eve\D()(heM.l ~\d-- \(\c~,~~
__ ""I"/A 2BBA - .... " ---,,- N-~.......... .,...' - = of lil
-e __ j t,- ~!! f--.-- ~ ~. .JJ ,~Iii
__ ~ _OS/k_,:: ~.:::.:-.-:::-".;:~I
~ ~ ; ~ c
" __' ~--~---Illll.a ;j
811 ~ . :m'!- -' JL - .... ii.. ~- ~ ~ a. ~
I .. ~g'llUlTT .. ~ '..11_" :-\:1. i .. . .... - :.... .... I 7' i~
r- ~ ~ HI ~ - : -~ - -- :. · - -. - - ~ -. ~ - ... -- .:: I ~ i
I ~ ~ "" ill""" Oil .. 5< :::l -;,";.:; J .... ~ .. "'" J::::'" ..:: I
.... "":l '" '"",::: III ... -"...r~ -- - :::.. ,:'!. __ - ...- Ol ..--.;;, .... '" ~
___ ...........;>-; ".-_ ....;;l ...--... II'" ~ ...... 1--- - 9-
-: ~ ~ ....-s-.. _ - iiifO.. ... _ ; ....-.... ii'! ~ ~ :: "'.... I : ::: I:" ~ ,..--~ oTr.. e '"
~_'"- ~ _:>.. - ~:: ,:-.. .. - =;:: :;_ ~~ -; I ~ ('
....;; .. ,."...;; .. ^ _ _~~ P N r:'iiii ~ ~ \oCt '\ c~ ~(2
l ...1 FIt .. ~ ~.-I " -_~ II ~'/,.r;r;- .; :: ;; ~ )..:; i 01 .. \ G}{ . ~ ~ \ {
II If"li - -if II N~ .7]- ."_" (-III II ) '-~ ,~; ~ Aclo"i.-'J\C)y'\S
:;)-:e I ~~1Il [> ~ <J __aft [) ~ ::~~ - R
- n~I~I~~I.1 ~..~.t: - ~ ~ r~.. C~' 0 ~ ~ ~_.... !f;-': !::S
, II .. .. II ~.. ~ I . .. \ ~ III - -- ..
"'Ii.'~" "'~ _.." .- :l~" - :: Y{/ '::'";; ~,;l; ~Tt. i
_ II '" - · !!-.:- .... - :t.. :!' 4.... .... 3 .. _ _ 1:'" ' .. :;: -.
1:= ~ :s ..::'-= l"'!I: .. .... I
_ 1:1" .... 1:1 "'.... ...... .... _" ~ '" -; '7C...... .... ~ ..;~ -.....
;:!1 ..::; :: ~ '.. .... ii I=,::l :.... =:... ... l! - iii iil.- I ...... --; II -~
<l .... i "It:! ;;:: q bill.... - .....; -;;.. - "-0,..," :all ~
~ '<l 1...-. 1-.,.. c;;.; '-" _.... -:Ji; - ...:.:.;
=-; _ -= I_..lit :: GW -i ""III ~ is to !::: .. l,oJ ....;;; t :~... ... ~ =-
--r - GU M1W..- lit - oM ~ a:&'IlI......... .... - G:I" -... j
.. Il:II .,. ..,;;: olIII ....... -=- UI a WI II"IIIIII ,.... IIIITI':="""~
1:::11,- "1 ~ I - ~ II'" .[0:: i:i (;;. l,;; .. ~ · ::: :: "".:::.. -, ,.,.,;; ..::. ,i ....
11I"'1!'" i .. """ II 1:1 ! III! IJ ..lm..i.:l ~ _;; ~.....;:;.;l I::' OS" It.. I;.~~ .;::: ;"..
;;:;... _ /Nt -,.- I&. Il\AI:<lII AISlll!l...... ~ r ~
~"'" ;;) _lli_611;; 1_ R_I~ iI~ g~ ': IB_ : -_ ~ ~ I":: B_ II:: ~~ I:: '. :;1111:: ~. ~.."C II
I..! i % i ~ i i i i i i j ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 i: i fir i if ~ 'f i! ~.\ ~
III Tel IS - UP Tl 1 ....-""..r
III. I."; ,: .0 :u~; ; ; ,.. ," _" :..... ~ 1_'" u" ." ~ 'i; .. I'" ..: ~
_1Vl J<<S.. ...__ - II ~
~.J~_ 1.1 _ )_I~~~}..~.."~".... -:.. ,.. ::.0:: :(~..' II I :: t ;. \\
:U~ "u:c.; 111m 11211-8\ .... &4 65" '" .... ... ~ I ;;;
.. .. .. :: ~.l ..~ f.. ~ ~ IP.. . .. .. - ::: a ... ~ "'E~~ .. ." - = i =-
.- .- .- I. D I a II a II .. .. .. n","" II II '.1 I ..!!! I ;...
I!A_ A1lO. ... llIlNlllO ,,- .r-'i G I II
~ II 11_ I B II_Ii ~~~: l\... ~ '"", ~ -.. .. - -:~ ~ : B.." II" I -: I~ r
'~II ....... 8:1 _ I - ... ~B".. ..... -..~ 1':-
__ . SJN11f: ~r ~IT..~ ... '" '" r .. .. ~ .. ~ ~ ... .. ~~.. .. .... - II::
g Ii II II i I: I i II II 11. I. i.. - - ~ .. ~ a I' I i! -... I ...
~ a II I .I~I I -; I. t ,II II " .. 1Mt.. ~ ~ . ~ --.... e I A;-': ~ - -5 I f
D. -" IN -I ............... - ....::,;.... I~. ..& 3 ....
~j ...: Ii .... is _ I.... ... ,,'" .. B.. p.. =-
~ - ;.:.:~~: -;-~:~ ~ ==~:.: . ..~ = -"...:
~ c-k---;:- - 1-..1III1-- ~ .... - ~~. I . a 1>..... "1-
'~ 1_ ~.. 111.. -:-1 "': .............. - - ;;:... 0"( j)", ....."..... . - -N
..... ... _!:._ 1 . oa
::- _ II... I I I 1 , 01 ... - ",... I
T~Rg7. 4
Uf\5truC'+iot\ S'I~
- ~~~~~~~")
* Ke..is-tOhe Url Ve..
00eS not Laole..
---:\~e \J.Jc....~ ~ '€.
f=- P \c.(6 'S Ir\ 0<...0
~ € S\.-'f ee-\- v...)G.. 5
neve" w~Je..nd
C'C\cl \\r-.e (e Ctfe
t) D "Ts\c..(\cl)
"\ n \y...e yy\"ld<l\e.
l'See SUfl)e~)
I I: ~ 1 ~@ ~ IUJlfP'U' .
t.1.. ~ I r -0 II ~il, I!II
~ I f'Il
CI i I, illWI
N N 0 .. 2!l! Q .... 6 f'Il 8
~ j ~ I i~ ~ 2 z
... i 0
.... Cl 0 .... l il I~! IJ!'i..1,!
~ li\ I E z
~ i! ,if ~ !~!i I B
~ .. !: I:l .e .,. · EB i I W. JI~~I
~ ! .. :III i'i .. , (! ,p~' i 1 P lli 8 5!;l ,
i ~ ~ ~, . " .. ~ I{I ~
~ ~ -8 P!l ,nJ!lil; ~I~I ~ll rO ~
al 'ad i, H! I' I ;
~ ! 'I ~.rll ~
i.1 g f 'lf~lfl
~ ii .. ;l, la I ,d ~ ~ OCT 2 7 2004
PWATEA ves
~..~.. ---~
~ ...
, , '
! ,
, , '
~~ ~~....~
i '
. '
tl ~~-..
~ n r
i ~ m
" c
=- f""
.
<: 0
i fTI
::ll
~ m
... ,!!
t1;
tt
51
!
~
...;
n ex -\-
bu-'\~
... ~ ....
.'
"
I... -;.t I l
~ ' ,
,,<
" .
"
"
1-~ ~:~ { -:;,{ ~ ~
7' ... ~ ~ ....~..... I - ~
,- '
~
I,. ~ ~.....
[) l.ll
r~
~
~ ~
~ ~
~ -<
r- ~
"'l ~
~
~~ ,.
, ,
j
~'--~j ... ....-
- ,
3 ~\>\e':>. ";j'nt>'-'.J, wc.s Or"trL.\~7
c..~ a. ~~rVV';(\j Uup\ex-
;>
,
"
_ l ~ _
, -
Cl
fTI
Z
1"1
::0
>'~
1'"",4(;\
<tt
n ,~
,
D.!
Z'
~
:II "
>:
~'"
, ,
,
~'l'~ ~-t':\, -, <
t . I ...
,~
~~~~~~ 1,'\
~ ~ It..~-!i!! l
~~. ..>,~ ~:,-'
'1; ~ ~ "~..'"
< ,
\ .... \ ~ ,
d ..... r
..... ~"1 "'~~~'..'"
:. ~" ""
~
.
;,
D'
z'
en
o
P'l
tD
(jJ
z
r:'l
::ll
tD
,
\'
rJr"t.rr.......
~ ~ ~\l
;) ..~~~_..\ ~ ~~.~~
"- r~J. ~'f-.lf &--T"''l,-" ,,!1 ~
....."J_..J.......~ ..
'.
(:GR rIFI:::D TO-
t ...~ ......
BARA MORTGAGE COMPANY INC.
UNIOI. .c'LANTERS
COMPLETE TITLE SERVICES INC.
OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE
INSURANCE CO.
~o4
w.e'_
-
DAVID A.-& SHARON A. COTE
SEC. _.lwr _s, I~GE _c.
^
(b(J I'/W)
")"
-:"1--
o
( ~ I ~ C ,'" [-_ c, I i ~ [" 1_ r
< ,
T
, ,
- - r,_
/ .
,
I I
l LI i I)
It
l_ I
IILl
,
r -
---
,~ I -
(II
c-->
u, .#'
-iLl
> '1 0'
W
~ ---- -"\ ~ ~ -~ - - - - - -- -- -- - ~
, , \~ , . I ' ,
- .
- U! ~iU' 1>.1
. .
'\ l r I~ 1,1 - '..
- ;...
I 11 b.tl ;) . ~ t ~
. ~~,
, ~'" ...... 0 1<, " :::
l'J . -- '" '0 CO
, . l~ {J :::
- - -- -- " f:~ 111 I', "<I i
'" \J\
.-.:.....-i ..:~_ -~~~ -;," " 1 ONr ';.,rrmy N
", ( I:J '- , ,
2'1 b 45 (!
'I
Q
.. ,
, ,
(-,
.If,!'
<;. c ,.e-
el!> GoV"'!.
I I P
1/1 I 'S41{ rlt
:.?
~
~-
"-
~
~
~
~
l~/,-AJ PdM
I \ II.;
-1 )..1
I,. M
4 X'l
, "K)
It, '
"BOUNlJARY SURVEY"
LE( ;END:
FIR ~ fClU"lD IRON ROD, F C I R = rOUND CAPI't:D IRON ROD. S C I R = SET CAPJ>ED IRON ROD. F I f' ~ FOUND IRON plp[
Fe I p: FOUND CAPPED IRO~I PIPE F NO: I-OU~lD NAIL a 01$1'1 S N D ~ ~ET NAIL e. DISK, C ~l ~ FOUND .:ONCRET[ MONUMENl
PH 11 = Pi RMANENT REFCFifNO" MONl..Mi=NT PCP ~ PERMAlIENT CONTROl. POINT, P 1 ~ POINT or INTERSECTION R I W = RIGHT (If WA.
EL~ v =ELEVATlON, CDS ~ CONCR[TE eLOCh STRUCTURE, CONC "'CONCRE1[;, ASPH : ASf>HAL T f'VM r '" PAVEMEN1
COY =COYERfO [) - OCED, SEC = SECllON rwf' - TOWN')HIP, RGE = RANGE P = PLAT, M = MEA5UR[ 0 I "MT = EASEM[:N I
F< ~ RADIUS. A ~ ARC. C '" CHORD C l.l ~ CI-jC'RD Sf ARII>lG, Sl Y ~ ~,TORY, eLf = CIIAIN L1NI\ fENCE, W F = woon FENI E
P.:0l COVERED
tLLl AREA
A $1 JRVFY OF
51,10 FT.
MANOR
BLOCK
"011
THE SOUTH
KEYSTONE
AS I <:ECC RED IN I"LAT BOOI< /0 PAGE 7/ ,01 THE I"UIJLlC RECORDS OF PINELLAS ( OUN ry, FLORID.f-
I ,^,ILLIAr-I C KfArING. TIfE ~URVfYOH IN flfSl'ONSIBLf CHARGl" CIOR flrv ntAT THf S~Vfl' I~CPnESE'NTCu HCht;ON AS MFE.TING fI~f MINIMUM 11:'< I1r~IC,"-
ST,t: NOARn$ Sf'T f(,"l"H BY THF Fl..ORIOA. aO.Af.tO OF iLA.1....D SLJr~VE:""'O~S Pl..lfiSUANT'O -ttLCTOIN ~"2:. 027 (JP lHE FLO~tDA. :5'l',ATUTf:S AS Pl~(:!::.("-rO!'.B~O I ~
CH.t' Pl'"E-A- 6lG17~6 CJEPT or F~OFE"SSIONA.L.. ~~Gut..ATION (NnT VI"l..ID \.JNl~f!SS SEALED WITH AN eMGO::1SE:D :r.!ur-.tVEYOR SSE.:..... )
--aEVATi)N STAfCMEN r THIS IS TO CCA1IFv 'HA r Wi: HAvlO OBTAU'E'D LU VA flONS $li<JWN H"'REON OF 1 HL ABOVE OESi..R'ero t N'<D l!11:Sf E:LLYAnC'~S
SH OWN I O(REON ARlO BI\SIOP ON lHr Nil, 110NAL "lORl '(.AL fJA TlJr-' 19~9 llfNCIIMAru\ ~ UPPI 1[0 Ell' fl1E' EN" 'NFER".e
Pf'f'T . , OUNTV FLORIDA flO(Xl lCN' olsn..... I IONS fJlE 8A~1 1J'(tj~ fH[ 11:1:f'1L'll FI1f-~CfNCV MAU^~H1EN1 N..EI,CV$ W\I>:, I"';(.fl' 10 us = '0 IfIC~ 'SfENCII ;
FOo"lf> IN ,'ESE I'W'S TIE Z('~S AA( AN l\Pffi(U(U1.O,TE I SToW. TtON TO enl OF 001 AIlII.IH
OF LOT
--
COMMUNITY No
PAI'II L NO
NAP OA TE
N'rr/lJ"<S TO Ill;
IN rlOOD lONE
BASf I lO:lCJ FLl. V
I, j,
X
/\//J "-' [
_/ 2.'6Jf (P
:Die:::
9-11/-9/
oL)/q!:::>
DRA....N BY
01\110-
3>~ 13,-7000
^LLIl D SURVEYING
21'8 [ oorw STIl!:H
n !'JlJlWA T fl1 !'I.(~' lOA
m-I,I,~-1,6~
O(ECI 1':0 BY
$C^LI." \" ";. 3D~
File Number 00-15027
--ZO~-a073 --
1 Polley Date 4/17/2000
Polley Number SOC 318922
Amount $ 60,000.00
at 1 0 : 34 am
Jf..**
* ~ i'*
~ 'f(, .
Jf
*...**
2 The Insured hereunder, In whom title to the fee simple estate IS vested at the date hereof, IS
DAVID A. COTE AND SHARON A. COTE, HUSBAND AND
WIFE
, The land referred to In thIs polley IS situated In the County of
State of Florida, and IS described as follows
Pl.nellas
The South 51.1 ft of Lot 1, Block "0", KEYSTONE MANOR, accordl.ng
to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 10, Page 71,
Publl.c Records of Pl.nellas County, Florl.da.
- -------~- - --- -------. ------------------ --
. ~.
j
'i
OCT 27 2004
~
_ny,",,,...,fl.ICD
Tk... _....1....... u...I.r1 ..._1" ., ('...........~..I^ D .. .............'--_..1
PLANNfN & 0 VElOPM[ 1\1'1 svcs
CITY OF ClEAP\lVll T(R
'.1
lU ~r;;,n4
.,41.,_ 1_.....
OR
b The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed In the Comprehensive
Landscape Program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permlt1ed on the parcel
proposed for development under the minimum landscape standards
2 LIghting Any lighting proposed as a part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program IS automatically controlled so
that the lighting IS tumed off when the bUSiness IS closed
C_ \,,) (feryt"{ \"e{"e~ \ S. (-\ ~ l- 'C"C"..\- \ \ d'r--~ . -"\) \.~~ J.\'i (-\ C' '{' c'':, S
,{,.- Cl..-.r"'\ "\"'r.e. r 'CnpC''<.C''c:\ De\)€ \(1~mC"r\ \- r("'C"\'1 eC.\- A\<..,(::-) -\ h e.re
\..0,\ \ '" 'e. 5pc'v r; t.y \ '~ h \- \ Y"1 J () i'" -\- \-...e ..p 'X +- fl. ,ne C'lC:: Th e. SO r Q ~ e .
3 Community Character The landscape treatment proposed In the ComprehenSive Landscape Program Will
enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater
r:\."yt'1f\+'i -\"'e{"(~ r-.'PA(~r;l~ c\t'ln'1 j:\r\e 'SOl)-\-" L.L)(-'S-\- ~~J('"
t,~c~'2~' q~1[) ~~;- ~~~e~ \~)~~C~ ;~~J~l7~e
~ r '\ VQ...~ '-\ 0 r C:>d (' ~Cl 'f'f" E- ,
P'J,le 2 of :3
S NOEL WHITE AND JACKF. WHITE ill
105 NORTH KEYSTONE DRIVE
CLEARWATER. FL 33755
ORIGINAL
October 14,2004
CIty of Clearwater
Attention: Wayne Wells
PlannIng Department
100 S. Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, FL 33756
VIa Facsinule - 562-4865
.RE: DaV1d A_ and Sharon A. Cote, 115 North Keystone Dnve, Clearwater, FL
FLD2004-Q6044
Dear Members of the Conunumty Development Board'
We live at 105 North Keystone DrlVe, Clearwater. Flonda, and receIVed nob.ce of Mr. and Mrs. Cote's plan
to build a 1 Va story three car garage attached to the duplex. at the above address. We support the Board's
approval of the Flexible Development plan submItted by the Cotes and request that the Board approve the
plan.
The Keystone Manor subdJ.Vlsion is a very dIverse commumty unlike so many other subdivisions in Pmellas
County. Withtn a 5 block rad1us you have many different sized lots which contalD duple;tcs. single family
one-story and two story homes. multi-fanuly housing> etc There are homes that were built m the 1940's WIth
much newer homes built on the same block. The Cote's plan to build do three car garage would greatly
Improve the subject property. The plan would not detract from the neighborhood andwiU mQst h1rely result
m mcreasing the value of surrounding properties. Several residents within a 5 mile radiUS of the subject
property have recetved permission to build a three car garage and the Cote's plan would adequately tic the
new strUcture into the existmg duplex on the property.
We know that some people have objected to the plan and have asserted that the Cote's would use the area
on top of the garage as add1tionalliving space. First, this would be impossible smee the additional space is
only a ~ stoIy. The area would be available to the tenants of the duplex far storage. A three car garage is
necessary so that the tenants of the property can park thelI" vehicles under coveT leaVIng sufficient spl;l.ce
available for the lawn equipment and other items (currently stored in a shed that ts on the property) used to
nuuntain the property. The look of the proposed garage would not be inconsistent With other structures in
the neighborhood SlDce there are a number of structLD'es in Keystone Manor that haw two full story garages.
The Planning Department has carefully reviewed the plans submitted by the Cotes and have reconunended
that the Board approve the plan We urge the Board to roHow the staff's recommendation.
Sincerely,
~r/!/luU
S. Noel White and Jack F. White m
~d .~-:wr
113 39'v'd
SLE55ELLGL r
135.50 p006/51/131
Wells, Wayne
..
PatriCia Cleary [pclearycross@hotmall com]
Friday, October 15, 2004402 PM
Wells, Wayne
DCOTE1@TAMPABAYRRCOM
David Cote
rom
Sent
To
Cc.
Subject.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD
RE FLD2004-06044
DAVID & SHARON COTE
115 N KEYSTONE DR
CLEARWATER FL 33755
THIS LETTER IS TO INFORM THE CITY OF CLEARWATER AND THE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD THAT DAVID COTE, OWNER OF
MAD FUSION INC CURRENTY RENTS A SECURE PARKING AREA FROM
US FOR HIS THREE- FORD F-350 BUCKET TRUCKS, ONE COMMERCAIL
BOX TRUCK, AND TWO SPLICING TRAILERS HE HAS RENTED THIS SPACE
FROM US SINCE MARCH 2004 HE IS A SUB-CONTRACTOR FOR US
(CROSS COMMUNICATIONS) DOING WORK FOR BRIGHTHOUSE ALL OF
HIS WORK IS IN PASCO AND HERNANDO COUNTY
I UNDERSTAND THE COTE'S ARE PROPOSING TO DO A GARAGE
ADDITION TO ONE OF THEIR RENTAL PROPERTIES, AND IT HAS BEEN
BROUGHT UP THAT HE MIGHT BE STORING THESE VEHICLES THERE
THESE ACCUSATIONS ARE IMPOSSIBLE, DUE TO THE SIZE OF THESE
VEHICLES
CURRENTY MR COTE DRIVES HIS PERSONAL VEHICLE (98FORD RANGER)
TO THIS LOCATION, MEETS WITH HIS CRUE OF EMPLOYEEIS THEY HEAD
OUT TO WORK WITH THE COMMERCIAL VEHICLES AND RETURN THEM ON
A DAILY BASIS
SINCERELY,
PATRICIA CLEARY
CROSS COMMUNICATIONS
1023 GUNN HWY
ODESSA, FLORIDA 33556
Express yourself lnstantly wlth MSN Messenger' Download today - It'S FREEl
http //messenger msn Cllck-url com/g%nm00200471ave/d~rect/01/
1
~
Wells, Wayne
From nlckandshannon [nlckandshannon@prodlgy net]
5e nt Su n day, October 17, 2004 1 0 51 AM
To Wells, Wayne
Subject [SULK] 115 N Keystone Dr
Importance' Low
ORIGINAL
Dear Mr Wells
We are writing In aVid support of the expanslon of property owned by Dave and Sharon Cote at 115 N Keystone
Dr As neighbors who have also done some renovahons and added a second level, we welcome the upgrades
Ihat are happemng around us, and are stili hoping for a renaissance to happen In the Sky Crest area We are sure
that the Cote's wIll desIgn the new addItion (three car garage) In the same good taste that they have shown with
all their other properties
Sincerely
Nick and Shannon Beck
1612 Laura St
Clw 33755
10/17/2004
~
j 'ol ~ \. ..
RECEIVED
UC J 1 J 2UU4
PLANNING DEPARTME~
CITY OF CLEARWATEf
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD! PUBLIC HEARING 10/19/04
REF, FLD2004-06044
DAVID & SHARON COTE
115 NKEYSTONE DR
CLEARWATER FL 33755
I AM A PROPERTY OWNER IN THE SKYCREST AREA AND HAVE LIVED HERE
FOR OVER 40 YEARS MY WIFE AND I HAVE VIEWED THE PLANS AND
AGREE THIS WOULD BE AN IMPROVEMENT IN THE AREA WE ALSO FEEL
IT WOULD INCREASE PROPERTY VALUES IN THE AREA THERE ARE MANY
OTHER 2 AND 3 CAR GARAGES IN THE AREA ALONG WITH 2 STORY HOMES
FROM WHAT I UNDERSTAND THIS WILL ONLY BE A 112 STORY ABOVE FOR
STORAGE WHICH WOULD NOT MAKE IT POSSIBLE FOR RENTAL SPACE
IN THE FUTURE I GIVE MY FULL SUPPORT TO T::JE COTE' THEY HAVE
MADE MANY IMPROVEMENTS IN THE AREA
-1J~ ~ p~~
;:;Y~P .-
/~CtJ~~_>> --
g~/ ;;zrc~
~ ~S 7~~~
ORIGINAL
OCT 2 7 2004
~
Wells, Wayne
From Pettmato, PJ [PJ Petlmato@trane com]
Sent Fnday, October 15, 2004455 PM
To Wells, Wayne
Subject RE 115 N Keystone Drive
Mr Wells,
I would like to make clear my support of the garage project planned by David and
Sharon Cote of 111 North Keystone Drive, Clearwater, FL 33755
A neIghbor of the Cote's for numerous years now, I've known them to be very respectful
of other neighbors, and very diligent In keeping their properties clean, and well
maintained Their presence In our neIghborhood IS a positIve one
The Cote's have a project under revIew at this time regarding a resIdential garage for
their tenants at 115 North Keystone Drive I have seen the plans, and support them
100%
Clearwater only benefIts from residents such as the Cote's They consistently Improve
the appearance of their neighborhoods, Increase property value, and are an Integral part
of Improving our neighborhood with each passIng year
Your approval of their garage project would only serve to continue this fine tradition
Thank you'
P J Pettinato
104 North Keystone Drive
Clearwater, FL 33755
(727) 480-5950 (mobile)
10/15/2004
PlAN IN PME
CITYQf ClEAPWATEA
Wells, Wayne
From
Sent
To
Subject
lI-Lee Tunceren [tuncerenJ@hotmall com]
Thursday, October 14, 2004 930 PM
Wells, Wayne
[BULK] 115 No Keystone Dr
Importance.
Low
Dear Mr Wells,
I was surpr1sed today to hear that some d1ssent was expressed about the
planned the garage and storage area on the corner of Keystone and Grove
The Cote's are good ne1ghbors whose property 1S always well~ma1nta1ned
Thelr acquls1t1on of 115 No Keystone is a plus to thlS ne1ghborhood as thelr
plans wlll enhance not only thelr own property value but those of
surroundlng homes Certalnly they w1ll bUlld the1r addition wlth qual1ty
materlals and workmanshlp
Please accept thlS letter as a show of publlC support for the Cotes and
thelr plans to better th1S ne1ghborhood
Thank you,
L1~Lee Tunceren
1615 Laura St
Clearwater, FL 33755
Express yourself lnstantly with MSN Messenger I Download today - It's FREEl
http /Imessenger msn Cl1ck-url com/g%nm00200471ave/d1rect/Ol/
OCT 2 7 2DO~
~
1
PlANNING & DEVELOPMENT SVCS
Cfry or ClEAPWATEA
.
Wells, Wayne
From
Sent
To
Subject
sabbott58@knology net
Friday, October 15, 2004 902 AM
Wells, Wayne
request by David and Sharon Cote
Dear Mr
Wells,
I am wr~t1ng 1n support of the request by DaV1d and Sharon Cote to bU1ld a
3 car garage I have 11ved 1n this ne1ghborhood for 5 years and they have
always kept the1r property neat and clean They are wonderful people and
the1r tenants seem very happy to have them as landlords I personally have
no Ob]ect1on to the bUlld1ng of a 3 car garage I have no doubt 1t w1II be
better kept than some of the houses 1n the nelghborhood I lmplore you to
grant the1r request, as truly 1t 1S to beneflt thelr renters They have no
plans to run any bus1ness out of 1t, or use 1t for anyth1ng but what lt 1S
des1gned for
slocerely,
Sandra Abbott
1666 Laura St
Clearwater, PI 33755
727-239-0429
OCT 2 7 2004
1
PlANNING & DEVELOPMENT SVCS
crrv~PWATER
- 0- - ~- -
~ ~
Wells, Wayne
From
Sent.
To
Subject
Lynn Plrreca [Iplrreca@bellavlstalnc com]
Monday, October 18, 2004 10 57 AM
Wells, Wayne
FLD2004-06044
ORIGINAL
Mr Wells,
I live In Clearwater at 1671 Laura Street, just around the corner from David and Sharon Cote They want to bUild
a 3 car garage on their property at 115 North Keystone Drive and J am writing to let you know that I am In favor of
the construction They keep their property Immaculate and a three car garage Will enhance the corner even more
Thanks,
Lynn PJfreca
1671 Laura Street
Clearwater, FL 33755
727-442-7508 home
727-643-6916 cell
om~
~
OCT 2 7 2Cn~
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENl svcs
CITY OF ClEAf'WA fEA
10/19/2004
I} .r
Rhoe Saporito R.N.
1670 Laura Street
Clearwater, Flonda 33755
(727)446-7854/458-7707
ORIGINAL
September 16, 2004
Ob) of Cleanvater
Planmng Department
100 South Myrtle Ave
Cleanvater, FI 33756
AU Commumb} Development Board
RE FLD2004-06044 - 115 North Keystone, Keystone Manor, Blk D, Lot 1 & 20
Dear Board Members,
ThIS letter IS to nohfy the CIty of Clearwater, that I am In support of DavId & Sharon
Cote bUIldmg a three-car garage at 115 North Keystone Dnve
I have owned 1671 Laura Street for over 15 years and 1670 for approXImately 4 years I
have done a great deal of Improvements to both properhes I am In the plannmg stages,
(WIth the CIty'S approval of course,) renovatmg 1671 Laura Street WIth that saId let me
take thIS opporturuty to show you the reasons why I am procrastmatmg
Reason # 11661 Laura Street - Tar paper patchmg eIther a whole and/ or to
prevent a leak It has been thelI for approxImately 2 plus years, and not to menhon the
garbage that IS conSIstently plied m the car port I would rather be hvmg next to or
around the Cote's and then 3-car garage
Reason # 2 1665 Laura Street In the front there IS an awrung that IS on ItS last
leg and half fallIng down and at the very least m need of a coat of pamt The back yard
IS not only a travesty, but also a health hazard Due to the o;ver grown vegetahon I
have personally seen a farruly of opossums commg from then yard and run across my
back yard at rught Not to menhon the rats Let me menhon the garbage, the 3 small
sheds to aVOId buIldmg one large shed and havmg to get a perrrut Agam, I would
rather lIve across or next door to a nIcely done 3-car gmage If It weren't for my son and
rus hfe long fnends, the mess that I look would have made me leave, however I queshon
tf 1 want to Improve any further
The Cote's have done outstandmg work to the vanous properhes that they own and 1
am assUled that the garage would be a great Improvement to the neighborhood and
serve as an amemty for then tenants
Smcerely,
Rhoe M Saponto, R N
OCT 2 7 2C~!t
Cc MI & Mrs Cote
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT VCS
CITY OF" ClEARWA TEA
,I II
roJ IE @ IE 0 W IE ffiI
UU OCT 1 9 2O~ lw
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
TO:
city of Clearwater Community Board
FROM;
Ken and Carol Strickland
1634 Laura 8t
Clearwater, Ft
DATB.
October 19, 2004
RE: David A. & Sharon A. Cotel Flexible Development
115 North Keystone Dr
Keystone ManOt~ BJk D, Lot I & 20
FLD2004aQ6044
Ken and I wish to show our support fur the Cotes and their request to develop the duplex
at 115 North Keystone Drive. While we are Wlable to attend the hearing to show our
support, we hope that this letter will serve in our place.
Any questions for us may be directed to mysel.t Carot at 464-3196 work or 63lJ..3771
eel1, or Ken at 639-3769 cell.
Thank you fur your time.
DC i 27 2flCi
PlANNING & DEVELOPMENT SVCS
CITY OF C~AfER
,) <:
Watkins, Sherry
From.
Sent.
To'
Subject.
Chase,Susan
Monday, October 18,2004834 AM
Tarapanl, Cyndl, WatkinS, Sherry
FW Comm Dev Meeting on Tues, Oct 19 2pm
See message below
Susan Chase
Off1c1al Records and Leg1slat1ve Serv1ces
(727) 562-4099
-----Or1g1nal Message-----
From Internet_Comment_Card [ma1lto-Internet Comment Card]
Sent- Sunday, October 17, 2004 8 58 PM
To. Clerkweb
SubJect: Comm Dev Meet1ng on Tues, Oct 19 2pm
Sender's Name Ellen V Knowles
Date sent 10/17/2004 7 57.37 PM
Comments
I would l1ke to make a statement on the request by Dav1d A & Sharon A Cote for a
flex1ble development approval at 115 North Keystone Dr , Key tone Manor, Blk D, lot 1 & 20.
FLD2004-06044.
I believe that th1S build1ng would enhance the ne1ghborhood I would l1ke to say that I
, approve th1S bu~ld1ng I l1ve at 1635 Laura St and I received a Not1ce about the
hear1ng, but am work1ng and unable to attend.
Thank you
Sender Ema~l
Ma1l1ng Address
Phone
~
C L W CoverSheet
c:.
~,
FLD2004-06044
115 N KEYSTONE DR
Date Received: 06/30/2004
COTE, DAVID & SHARON
ZONING DISTRICT: LMDR
LAND USE: RU
ATLAS PAGE: 288B
PLANNER OF RECORD: WW
C L W CoverSheet
,.-
, , 'f
PA I D
CK NO. 39c:o
DATE <..0- 30-01
FLD2004-06044
115 N KEYSTONE DR
Date Received: 06/30/2004
COTE, DAVID & SHARON
ZONING DISTRICT: LMDR
LAND USE: RU
ATLAS PAGE: 288B
PLANNER OF RECORD: NOT ENTERED
- ,
, ~
-",,-
.~1"1J:!-n>~
~-~~ ! lit fl/t.
&~~~~~~
j~~,)l{,~ ~,~
~~r-:f:;~- - ~=
~~ =.--:==- ~
~~~~~~
~~i~~~
CITY OF
CLEARWATER
loNG RANGE PlAl'lNING
DEVELQPMEl\ T REvIEW
Mr Davld Cote
Mrs Shm on Cote
111 N Keystone Dnve
Clearwater, FL 33755
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CUARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL S[RVlCES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLFARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865
November 17,2005
RE FLD2004-06044 - 115 North Keystone Dnve
Tlme ExtensIOn Development Order
Dear Mr and Mrs Cote
On November 16, 2004, the Commumty Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the above
FleXIble Development application for (I) the TermmatlOn of Status of Nonconformity for density
for the purpose of addmg a two-car garage, under the provISIOns of Section 6-109, and (2) the
expansIOn of attached dwelhngs with a reductiOn to the front (north) setback from 25 feet to 20
feet (to buildmg) and a reductIon to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to
bUlldmg), as a ReSidential Infill Project, under the provIsions of Section 2-203 C, and a reductIOn
to the landscape buffer along the south property hne from 10 feet to five feet, as part of a
Comprehenslve Landscape Program, under the provISIOns of SectiOn 3-1202 G
SectIon 4-407 of the Commumty Development Code reqUires the apphcatlOn for a bUlldmg
penmt wlthm one year of the date the CDB approved the request ThIS same SectIOn allows an
extensIOn of time to mltIate a bUlldmg penmt, proVided good cause IS shown and documented m
wntmg wIthm the ongmal penod of validity The Plannmg DIrector may also consider whether
slgmficant progress on the project IS bemg made and whether or not there are pendmg or
approved Code amendments WhICh would sIgmficantly affect the project
On November 14, 2005, you submltted a request for a hme extensIOn to submit an appl1cahon to
construct the Improvements on your parcel In accordance w1th the prOVIsIOns of SectIOn 4-407
of the Community Development Code, I APPROVE a one-year time extensIOn to November 16,
2006, to submIt an applIcatton for a bUlldmg permlt to construct the Site Improvements on your
parcel at 115 North Keystone Dnve All conditions of approval adopted by the CDB are sttll m
effect and apphcable
The CDB may approve one addItional extension of hme after the Planmng Director's extenSIon
to lmttate a butldmg permit applieatlOn Sueh extenSlOn shall not exceed one year, shall be for
the project ongmally approved and shall be for good cause shown and documented m wntmg
The CDB mllst receive the request for thiS extension wIthm the one-year penod of vahdlty after
the ongmal extenSIOn approved by the Planmng DIrector Good causes may lllclude but are not
hmlted to an unexpected nattonal cnSIS (acts of war, SignIficant downturn m the nahonal
economy, etc), exceSSIve weather-related delays, and the hke The CDB may also consider
whether sIgl11ficant progress on the project IS beIng made and whether or not there are pendmg or
approved Code amendments WhI(,h would slgmficantly affect the project
fRANK HIIlBARD, MAYOR
Ell! JOMON, VICF-M WaR
HoYT HA\111 ] ON, COllM 111,1rMIII H
@)
IOHr. DOR.\t\, COLJt\CII_\IHlIlfR
CAlli HI A PrTFR~J t\, COUt\CII \Il-~IHFR
"c<"QlJAI EMPIOYi\II r-II AN!) ArnRMA11VI AC1l0'l [MPI 0't1 R"
November 17, 2005
Cote - Page 'I wo
Please be aware that the Issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity
to obtam any buddmg permIts or pay any Impact fees that may be reqUIred In order to facilitate
the Issuance of any permIt or license affected by thlS approval, please brmg a copy of thIs letter
With you when applymg for any permIts or hcenses that reqUIre this pnor development approval
If you have any questlons, please do not heSitate to call Wayne M Wells, Alep, Planner III at
727-562-4504
Smcerely,
~.:;i?$!T"-
MlCha~
Planmng DIrector
S IPlannmg Departmentl CD HlFLt'X (FLD)lfntlCllve or Flmshed AppilcmwnslKeystone NO! 15 Cote (LMDR) - ApprovedlKeyslOlle
N OJ! 5 Time ExtenSIOIl Deve/opmelll Order II 1705 doc
.'
\,\oV( f ( aoo5
~
City of Clearwater
Planrung & Development
Attn. Wayne Wetts-
Ref Property, 115 N KeY~LOne Dr
Clearwater Fl 33755
Thrs Property was approved fora 2.cargarage addrtIor"l, Or"l Novo 16,2004
1 Sharon Cate, mvner of the property would ilke to request a 1 year extemlon
The prans are cun-entry beIng drawn,up By Ron Scarretta However he has
told us It Will be Dee before he can have them back to us We plan on starting
the constructIon ,after the fIrst O-fthe year We have a contractor !tned up and
I1e writ be puHtng permits 1'1 Jar", 2006 We are lookrng fO!'\lv'ard to cornplete'l"g
thiS project We just had a few delays In getting started
Thank you for unaerstanolng If you havB-.any questIon please call 727-455.2130
or Ron Scarretta at 727-423.2603
Smcerly
Sharon Cote
r-- -" -
fOl~rc~~~7~ r~"'.'
i ~~r:-'- -,/01 J J I
I rU~O~420~&
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES
C!7" o~:? r:AAWATEA
wayne well s
Clty of clearwater
plannlng and Development:
Apnl 19, 2005
Re: 115 N Keystone dr.
clearwater Fl 33755
Garage addltlon
city
ThlS letter 15 to ask for a mlnor reVlSlon before we do the blue prlnts.
we are wantlng to rotate the beeze-way This would change the wldth from
12'to 20' wlde, and the depth from 20 to 12'. The reason for thlS change
15 there are currently two wlndows on the slde of the duplex (bedroom and
kltchen area). ThlS change would allow for the bedroom wlndow to remaln,
allowlng the tenant to see out of the bedroom wlth this change we wlll
stlll be 12' from the property llne. WhlCh the set back 15 requlred
to be 5'. This change does not alter or add to the structure in any way
please conslder these changes so we can go forward on the plans
,LP~/k;
Davld Cote- Owner
J2e-~ rt'f'.. s-e.. "j
~"o1- ~o
.f,
page 1
r \J t\ VA-:}-
4 ... +0 (,
lO/L2-) fAJ
ww
~ 4-401
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE
Section 4-401. Purpose and applicability.
ThIs dIvIsIOn establishes the approval reqUIred
to eommence development of a use m a zonmg
dIstnct wruch IS Identified m that dlstnct as
requmng a Level '!\vo approval A Level Two
approval IS granted by the commuruty develop-
ment board, based on a recommendatIOn, of the
community development coordmator As wIth Level
One approvals, dependmg on the nature and
character of the use, the applIcatIOn may reqUIre
a sIte plan, plat approval, a traffic rmpact study,
and/or a certificate of concurreney capaCIty, as
part of Its applIcatIOn for approval After a '!:.evel
Two approval IS obtamed, a bUlldmg and an
occupancy perllllt are required, as well as any
reqUIred lIeenses
Section 4-402. Application.
An applIcant for a Level Two approval shall
submIt an apphcatIOn In accordance WIth the
reqUIrements of sectIon 4-202 (A) and (E) 'to the
commumty development coordmator who shall
reVIew the applIeatlOn m accordance WIth the
reqUIrements of sectIOn 4-202 eC) and (D)
,
Section 4-403. Staff review, report and rec-
ommendation.
After the commumty development coordmator
has reVIewed the applIcatIon WIth the develop-
ment reVIew comIDlttee 10 accordance WIth the
prOVISIOns of sectIon 4-202 (C) and (D), the coor-
dmator shall transmIt a wntten recommendatIOn
to the commumty development board, or the
heanng officer, If applIeable, With a copy to the
apphcant, settmg forth recommended findmgs of
fact regardmg whether the applIcatIOn conforms
to the fleXIbIlIty cntena III the zonmg dlstnet m
which the property IS located, proposed conclu-
SIOns offaet and law and recommended condItIOns
eoncernmg the applicatIOn
Section 4.404. Community development
board decision.
Upon receipt of the reeommendatIOn of the
commumty development coordmator, the commu-
mty development board shall reVIew the apphca-
tIon, the recommendatlOn of the commuruty de-
velopment eoordmator, conduct a quasI-JudIcIal
Supp No 11
publIc heanng on the apphcabon m accordance
With the reqmrements of sectIon 4-206 and grant
the approval, grant the approval subject to spec-
Ified condItIOns or deny the applicatIOn for devel-
opment approval The reVIew and public hearmg
shall be held WIthm 33 work1.ng days after deter-
mmatlon of suffiCIency, unless the time frame IS
extended by mutual consent of the apphcant and
the CIty The commumty development board shall
render a deCISIOn not later than 70 days after the
lllItlal heanng unless the tune frame IS extended
by mutual consent of the applIcant and the CIty
The commumty development board shall attach
su'ch condItIOns to the approval whIch are neces-
sary to ensure complIance WIth the applIcable
general and specIfic fleXIbI'lIty reqmrements set
out m Articles 2 and 3 mcludmg the proVIsIOns of
sectlOn 3-911 ill regard to general standards for
approval condItIOns
(Ord No 6526-00, & 1,6-15-00, Ord No 6998-02,
~ 4, 7-18-02, Ord No 7106-03, ~ 20, 9-18-03)
Section 4.405. Effect of a Level Two deci-
sion.
Approval of a level two approval shall be deemed
to authonze only the particular use for whiCh It IS
Issued and shall entItle the reCIpIent to apply for
a bUlldnig permIt or any other approval that may
be reqmred by trus development code, the CIty or
reglOnal, state or federal agenCIes Such approval
shall be eVIdenced by a wrItten dev,elopment
order Issued by the commuOlty d~velopment coor-
dmator that confirms the commuruty develop-
ment board's deCISiOn and shall be effective upon
the date of the board meetmg when the deCISIOn
was rendered
(Ord No 7106-03, ~ 21, 9-18-03)
,/
Section 4.406. Changes to Level Two devel-
opment approvals.
A Mmor reVLSLOns The commumty develop-
ment coordmator IS authonzed to allow mmor
reViSIOns to an approved Level Two approved
after receipt of comments from the development
reView commIttee A mmor reVISIOn is one whIch
1 Does not alter the location of any pnvate
street and/or dnveway by more than 20
feet
CD4 20
, - i...
,)
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND OTHER PROCEDURES
@ 4-501
,
)
2 Does not change the use unless sueh change
IS of a SImIlar or less mtenslty, as deter-
mmed by the eommumty development
coordmator
3 Does_not mcrease the denSIty or mtenslty
of the developme'nt
r ,,"- 1
4 Does 'not result In a reduction of setback
or prevIOusly requll'ed landscape area
5 Does not result In a sj.lbstantIal change to
the locatIOn of a structure prevIOusly ap-
proved
6 Does not result In a substantial modIfica-
tion or the' cancellatIOn of any condItIOn
placed upon the applIcatIOn as ongmally
approved 'I,
7 Does not add property to the parcel pro-
posed for development
8 Does not Increase the heIght of the bUlld-
mgs m a manner that WIll change the
overall height ofthe proJect, WIll not alter
the scale of the proJeet, does not exceed
the maxunum heIght perlllltted In by the
apphcable special area plan and zonIng
dIstnct "
l
9 Any other mmor reVISIOn' that does not
substantially. alter the character and de-
SIgn of the project
BOther reVlswns Any other adjustments or
changes not speCIfied as "mInor" shall be granted
only m accordance WIth the procedures for ongI-
nal approval
(Ord No 7106-03, ~ 22, 9-18-03)
Section 4407. Expiration of a Lev~l Two ap-
proval. ' ,
Unless otheIWlse speelfied m the approval, an
applIcatIOn for a bUlldulg permit shall be made
wlthm one year of the date of the Level Two
approval, and all requrred eertIficates of occu-
pancy shall be obtamed Wlthm two years of the
date of Issuance of the Initial bwldmg pernut
Permitted tIme frames do not change WIth succes-
sive owners An extenSIOn of time to Imtlate a
bUIldmg pernut may be granted by the commu-
mty development coordmator prOVided It IS for a
penod not to exceed one year, IS for the project
Supp No 11
CD4 20 1
ongmally approved and prOVIded good cause IS
shown and documentei::l' In wntmg I wlthm the
Original penod of vahdrty The eommurnty devel-
opment coordmator may also conslCler whether
slgmficant progress on the project IS bemg made
and whether or not there are pendmg or approved
- v ! ,[.... I
Code amendments whIch would slgruficantly af-
fect the project The commumty development board
may approve one addItional extenSIOn of time
after the commumty development coordlllator's
extensIOn to ImtIate' a bwldmg permIt apphca-
tIon Such extenSIOn shBlI not' exceed one year,
shall be for the project onglOally approved and
shall be for good cause shown 'and 'documented ill
TIt d l~f'l~)' ~Jr" b d
wntmg e commumty eve opment oar must
receIve the request for thls ,~xtensIOn wlthm the
one-year penod of vahdIty after the ongInal ex-
tenSIOn approved by the community development
coordmatgr -Good causes may lJlclude but are not
hmIted to~ an unexpected nation.al cnSiS (aets of
war, SIgnIficant downturn m the natIOnal econ-
,
omy, ete), exceSSive weather-related delays, and
the hke Iii'the event a: proJecf IS governed by a
development agreement, the tImeframes estab-
hshed In the agreement sbaII. supercede these
~ ''\lot! )l'JjJ '
requrrements The eominuiUty development board
'"'~ I f,{~ l ,j'
may also conSider whether slgO.lficant progress on
..- r f ,.., I !
the project IS bemg made and whether or not
there are p>endmg 9r approved Cqde ameqdments
wInch would,sIgrufieantly affect the project Amend-
ments whIch Will require no or, linnor amend-
ments (as p~ovIded by section 4-406 A) may be
.1
approved Aroendme!lts "{hlch will reqwre a ma-
jor reVISIOn to the subject project shall be reqUIred
J , ""OJ 1
to be approved as part of a new Level Two
apphcatIOn Transfer of development 'qghts are
exempt from tlus prOVISIOn
(Ord No 6526-00, ~ 1,6-15-00, Ord No 7106-03,
~ 23, 9-18-03)
DMSION 5 , APPEALS
Section 4-501. Authority and purpose.
,
A The commumty development board has the
authonty to hear appeals from
1 AdmmIstratIve mterpretatiOns of thIS de-
velopment eode
"
l_,
aar:rIIDUd?".
~ ~~~~~L 01 i'ltl:...........
~'.l~ 'lll""mi-...,..j!)'*_
~~~t 4I'~.~'f=&.
I.\~~l~\jl/~~\ !?,~
~ ,,-.... :l'f~r) _
I:I~' ~- ." ~~
r:;- -,- \ ,< ~
':.\rIf1:~~ - ~:
';.~~~--==. ,,~~\
"'IQo "'40-~,' \
- 7A;'~~u""~"\;, 't\
-......{(4TER ~I't
"q--,.IT JLlI,l11
CITY OF
CLEARWATER
loNG RA.'lGF PLANNING
DEVELOPMI:NT REVIEW
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLFARWATFR, FlORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AYFNUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TEl FPHONE (}27) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
November 18,2004
Mr DavId Cotc
Mrs Sharon Cote
111 N Keystone DI Ive
Clc.m water FL 33755
RE Development Order ~ Case FLD2004-06044 - 115 North Keystone Dnve
Dear Mr and Mrs Cote
ThIS letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to SectlOn 4-206 D 6 of the Commumty
Development Code On November 16, 2004, the Commumty Development Board reviewed your
Flexible Development apphcatlOn for (1) the Termmahon of Status of Nonconformity for density for the
purpose of addmg a two-car garage, under the PlovlSlOns of SectIOn 6-109, and (2) the expansIOn of
attached dwellmgs wlth a reduction to the front (north) setback from 25 feet to 20 feet (to bU11dmg) and a
reductlO11 to the Side (south) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to bulldmg), as a Res1denhal Infill Project,
undel the prOVISIons of SectIOn 2-203 C, and a reductIOn to the landscape buffer along the south property
llI1e flOm 10 feet to five feet, as part of a Comprehensive landscape Program, under the prOVISIOns of
SectIon 3-1202 G, for the property located at 115 North Keystone Dnve The Commu111ty Development
Board (CDB) APPROVED the applicatIOn With the followmg bases and conditIOns
Ba5es fOl Approval
1 The proposal complIes With the FleXIble Development errtena as a Residential lnfill Project per
SectIon 2-404 F
2 The proposdl 1& m compliance With other standards m the Code mcludmg the General Applicability
Cn terra per SectlOn 3 -913
3 The proposal complies With the FleXible Development errtena as a Comprehensive Landscape
PlOgram under the provlSlOns of SeGtlOn 3-1202 G
4,..- The development IS compatible With the surroundmg area and Will enhance other redevelopment
efforts
Conditions of Approval
1 That use of the garage and storage area above be restncted to reSldent use of the duplex only,
2 That, pilar to the issuance of a bUlldmg permlt, the site plans mdlGate the eXlstmg, eastern dnveway
be shown to be removed and
3 That, pi lor to the Issuance of a bUlldmg permit, the landscape plan be revised to mdlcate trees
meetlng Code SIze reqlllrements
BIllAN J AUNGS I, I>1A VOR COM~H"SION[R
HOYJ HAMill ON, VICF MA YOR-COMMI\'.,JONJ R WH ITNrv G It \ V, (0\1,\11,"10i\ C 1\
FRA,\~ J-llIlBARO, (OM~m"IONj 1\ * BII I )ON<;ON, COM~\I',,!Oi\1 R
"[<"QUAL EM PI OYM I N rAND AFI JR\tA 1 Iyt At 1 ION EM!'! OYI R"
"
c:,'.
-,
I"
,
November 18,2004
Cote - Page Two
Pur"uant to Section 4-407, an appilcatlOo for a buddmg pelIDlt shall be made wlthm one year of Flexible
Development approval (November 16, 2005) All reqUired certificates of occupancy shall be obtamed
wlthrn one yea! of the date of Issuance of the burldmg pennIt TIme frames do not change wIth
successive owners 'I he Commumty Development Coordmator may grant an extenslOn of tlme for a
period not to exceed one year and only wlthm the ongmal peflod of validity The Commumty
Development Board may approve ooe additional extensIOn of tIme after the commumty development
coordIoatOl's extenSIon to 100tJate a buJldmg penmt appheatlOn
The ISSUJnCC of this Development Order docs not reheve you of the necessIty to obtam <iny bUlldmg
permits or pay any 11l1paet fees that may be reqUIred In order to faelhtate the Issuance of any permIt or
lIcense affected by thIs approval, please bnng a copy of thIs letter with you when applymg for any
permIts or licenses that reqUire thIs pnor development approval
AddItlOnally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to
SectIon 4-502 B by the apphcant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the
CDB meetmg The fihng of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the declslOo pendmg
the fmal determmatIon of the case The appeal penod for your case expires on November 30, 2004 (14
days from the date of the CDB meetIng)
If you have any questIOns, please do oat heSitate to call Wayne M Wells, AICP, Planner III, at 727-562-
4504 You can access zonmg mformatlon for parcels wlthm the City through our webslte
www mvclearwatel col11/l!ov/depts/planmng *Make Us Your Favonte!
~
CyothIa }-I Tarapam, AICP
Plaonmg DIrector
S 1f'lanlllng DepmlmclJllC D BIFLEXlPelldll1g cases\Up for the l1ext CDB1Keyslone N OJ 15 (Ole (LMDR) - ApprovedlKeyslOi1e N OJ /5
DevelopmelJt Order doc
~ all aJTQ-ITD~
~~o~~WOFr/fe.-:~,,""...
\~~ ~","L<<i:>"......~)I.""..
,~." ~.......~...
1:l~~",)j/ ~~ ~ ':.
~....... ~ ~ ~
I>lIi"il _- 'C' ~~
...~;.. ~ '"" E;j11l
"'T' ~ - ~ , Ik"~
';.~.,.....","- - ,..r-.......--:\
~~I1/......"'m".J~~l
...-.........,.~TE~,..J1~"
.... .D1T-1111 ~
CITY OF CLEARWATER
loNG RANGF PLANNING
DFVFLQPMENT REvIEW
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CIFARWATER, FWRlDA 33758-4748
MUNICiPAL S!:RVlCES BUIlDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTlE AVENUE, CLf.ARWA1I:R, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONF (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
October 22,2004
Mr DdVld Cote
Mrs Sharon Cote
111 N Keystone Dnve
Cleaf\vater, FL 33755
RE FLD2004-06044, 115 North Keystone Dnve
Dear Mr and Mrs Cote
The Commumty Development Board (CDB) at theIr meetmg on October 19,2004, contmued the
above referenced request to their November 16, 2004, meetmg The request IS for (1) the
TermmatlOn of Status of Nonconfonmty for density for the purpose ofaddmg a three-car garage,
under the provIsions of SectIon 6-109, and (2) the expansIOn of attached dwellmgs with a
reductlOn to the front (north) setback from 25 feet to 20 feet (to bmldmg) and a rcductlOn to the
Side (south) selback from 10 feet to five feet (to buIldmg), as a ReSidential Infil1 Project, under
the provISIons of SectIOn 2-203 C, for property located at 115 North Keystone Dnve
If you have dny questIOns, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M Wells, AICP, Planner III, at
727-562-4504
SI;:,t:~l~~A~A~!
utf~fH"IH,PT~
Cynthia H Tarapam, AICP
Planmng DlrectOl
S If'tl11li/lflg Def'(IJ Imei1/1 CD B1FLEX\Pei/rllIIg cllsesl Up 1m Ihe ne;cl CDB1K eyslOIle NO 1/5 Cole (! M DR) II 16 04 CDBIKeyslOne N 0115
CDB COJllllUllllIce LeI/eI 10 22 04 doc
!:lRl'J'l J AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMJ~SIONFR
HOYr HAMil JON V](] i\{AYOR-COMMI~SIONER WHlfNFY GR,W, CO,llM1S"ONI H
FR>\Nf. HIBBARD, COMMISSIONFR * 51] I JONSON, CO\I~lI\:'IONrH
"EQUAl EM PLOYMJ N I AND ^nl RMA I IV! AC1 ION rM PI OYFR"
,.
~ ,-;~ii.arwater
f- - ,- ,< ~ " -:' g.
()
TO:
FAX COVER MEMO
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
100 S. MYRTLE AVE.
CLEARW ATER, FL 33756
(727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865
Sk~ ~
- +\0 I . 11,4'
FAX:
Phone: +,)- ~-- '2...1 ~ 0
FROM: ~ W!.\\.1
DATE:_ -I'\l 0__
Phone: S\D -z.. - ~ J\) +
RE: Ll~ N. kA3~
) -
~y f\l t ~", tv-.
MESSAGE:
ltL \-\u- .~
NUNIBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE)~
FROM :Ho~e Rentals & Realt~.rnc
FAX NO. 7275966958
ct 19 2004 11.12AM P2
October J 91 2004
City of Clearwater Planning Department
Attention Wayne Wells, AICP
Senior Planner
100 S Myrtle Ave
Clearwater. FL 33758
,
Re' Cafle # FLD2004~06044 Proposed developrnentltemllnation of non-confonning
status 115 Keystone Dr '
Dear Board mernbers,
We own the property at 1651 Grove St Clearwater, whIch js RIGHT next to the proposed
budding qite. We have many concerns about what is being proposed We hope to alert
you to some of our concerns so that this proJcct docs not got "pushtXi through" too
qUlckly causing potential detrimental effects on our commwrity_
TIns property already houses a non-conformmg duplex. It also already has .'reduced
setbacks" It 1S a small duplex with a one bedroom apartment on each side A three carj
two story garage seems excessive. What 1S the purpose oftbe 12' x 20' breezeway?
There appears to be no Ingress/egress to either the breezeway or the garage/"stomge loft"
from e1ther unit-who will really be using thIS additional space? It seemR adding an this
parking/storage area will only encourage more traffic and overcrowding oftlus NON~
CONFORMING multifamily property.
Ow neighborhood is zoned RESIDENTIAL rt is a quaint. quiet area, with small, modeqt
homes, Most of the homes 10 our subdivision are 2 - 3 bedroom/1-2 baths with single car
carports or garages The purpose of the label "non-confonning use" is to CLEARLY
identifY a property that does not fit in With the composition of a neighborhood or the
zoning and ordinances in whIch It resides. This dwelling is aIready a duplex located in a
residential neighborhood. It has been "grandfathered in" so to speak The status of Un on-
conforming use" does NOT allow tins non-conforming use to be expanded upon. Thts
was done to protect the neighborhood from expanslOn of this NON-CONFORMING
multifamily property which is EXACTLY what the owner IS now petitioning to do! It
goes against the whole purpose of the code
We are VERY concerned about the size of thiS garage Jt is MASSIVE In comparison to
our house, and to all of the other houses in the neighborhood I It wilJ TOWER over our
home. It defIDItely does NOT confonn with the style and si.oGe of the homes in our
neighborhood Our house is a mere 2 bedroomll bath with a one car carport---as are
MOST of the house'! on our street and in our subdivislon
We also o~ect to reducing the front setback for thiS addjtion by five feet We have a
large picture window and a front porch with very enjoyable neighborhood views.
Allowing thlS garage to be moved five feet forward will not only obsttuct our VICWu-
tFROM .H~me Rentals & Realty, In'
FAX NO. '7275966958
ct. 19 2004 11:12RM P3
especially in comparison to the open space that is there now, but it wilt also "crowd us
in", encroaching on our feelings of spaciousness and openness. This is why fences are
not allowed to be moved forward into the setbacks. A SIX foot fence would not be
allowed, yet you would consider allowmg a TWENTY foot garage? TIns is unacceptable
to us
T am a licensed) Florida real estate broker and have owned a property management
business h~re in Pinellas County SlOce 1994. In ALL my years In sales and rentals
(totaling over 15 years) I have NEVER seen such a disproportionate sight! Why two tiny
one bedroom apartments need an 852 square foot, three car garage with second story
"loft" PH NEVER understand. It seems, from my expenence, that thts "loft" will most
certamly be used as some type of liVUlg space at SOme point if this addition is allowed.
Even if THIS owner has no intentIon of doing so, you best: beheve at SOme point in the
future tins wtll be contemplated and very possibly acted upon.
Another bJg consideration is the fact that the owner of this duplex LIVES directly behind
it. It seems odd to me, agam as a realtor, that there is no proposed ingress/egress from
either duplex unit to the garage. Interestmgly, there IS however direct access to the
garage &om the OWNER'S home through a gate to this garage. It appears as rfthere IS
some interest lo "comrnmglc" the use of the garag!: on this property With the owner's
contiguous property. Access to the garage, as it IS proposed, is easier for the owner, yet
they say the garage is bemg built for the tenants. Why a THR.EE car garage for a TWO
unit complex -units with only one bedroom each., at that? Agam I'JI say this is
EXCESSIVE
We have owned OUT home at 1651 Grove St since 1990 We have NEVER seen that
parking at this duplex has been an issue. It appears. to us. that these one bedroom units
have each had only one car per unit at any given time This property, buiJt in 1949, never
even had a DRJVEW A Y until 1992' Now it has TWO driveways which provide ample
parking for these small uruts. We do nol want this non--<;onfonnmg property expanded
upon.
We have heard. on more than one occasion, that Mr. & Mrs. Cote have been runnmg
some kind of furniture business from their home. and also have, on occasion, aquired and
sold a large number of trucks and cnmmerclal vehicles. ft make.~ us wonder what the
"true use"' oftlus massive 3 car garage and 2nd story storage space will be. Won't addmg
this type of storage and parking only encourage more reSidents, carr,;, and "hustle-bustle"?
We do not want to encourage this in our quiet) residential neighborhood
The owner provides, in his requellt, examples of two other neighborhood homes that have
added garages in recent years. NOTE: These are both single family homes whose
garages were added in confortnity to the houses themselves. The front elevations are not
grossly disproportionate to the homes and flow with the basiC height of the subject homes
fO which they were added AND the homes throughout the neighborhood The only one
they give an address on, the flTSt one labeled as 1661 Harvard St is a single family
-2-
FROM .H~me Rentals & Realty, Inc
FAX NO. .7275966958
~t 19 2004 11.12AM P4
reSIdence on a 110 x 138 lot ( 34 ACRES)I the subject duplex IS on a lot measurmg
merely 5J x 138 ( 162 ACRES)----it is balfthe size!
We, therefore, o~ect to this project as it has been proposed. We vehemently object to the
tenmnation of it's non-eonfonning status. It is a non.confonning duplex in a residential
neighborhood and should remain labeled as such until it'slt1ultlfamily use is truly
terminated. The buildmg already encroaches into the setbacks Allowing this non-
conforming property 10 grow to such a grand scale goes against the splnt and purpose of
the code. You may find thlS to be a "back door approach" to a potential urness". Once
thIs has been done, it can not so easily be uWldone"-we want to assure the value and
conformity of our neighborhood
- -3-
pffPI.1ITU'"",
~ ~t'\'t.f:\LCF rIiE;r...
,,'!':.~~\ ~"',.,..-~~',"'>2f.i'~,.,.
..~ :-'l\.' ',,,,
~,,~., I ~-- '"
~iPl::;:""irr"....\ '/ ~ ~ ~'I::I,
"-.,~:.'"
1::lC"aJl'>= ~ q
~ !l:l ~- IIp'l. ~
...JC.:;.~ ::.....-=:=- l~, ~'"
",ir~: ~ -=" ;:::;:>~
':.~--- -~~ .,~~"
'\do ~....-~ ~t" "
... 'Ij/.,....,..". i((\;:: "
.............)lTE",~" "
"" -4r1 pI'
CITY OF CLEARWATER
loNG RANGJo. PlANNING
DFVFI OPMENT RE"VIEW
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OHIO Box 4748, CrEARWATJ-R, FIOKlDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SJo.RV1CES BUILDI"IG, 100 SOUTH MYRl1 F AVfNUJ:, CI EARWATrR, FlORIDA 33756
TFIFPIIONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
September 27,2004
Mr David Cote
Mrs Sharon Cote
III N Keystone Dnve
Clearwater, FL 33755
Re Commu111ty Development Board Meetmg (Case No FLD2004-06044)
Dear Mr and Mrs Cote
The FleXible Development applicatIOn (Case No FLD2004-06044) for (1) the TenmnatJon of
Status of Nonconformity for density for the purpose of addmg a three~car garage, under the
prav! slons of SectlOn 6-109, and (2) the expansion of attached dwellmgs wIth a reductIOn to the
front (north) setback from 25 feet to 20 feet (to bmldmg) and a reductlOn to the slde (south)
setback from 10 feet to five feet (to buIldmg), as a Residential Inft11 ProJect, under the provIsions
of SectIOn 2-203 C, for property located at 115 North Keystone Dnve has been deemed sufficIent
dnd ha::. been scheduled to be reviewed by the Commulllly Development B03J.d on October 19,
2004
The meetmg wtll take place at 2 00 pm 111 the City Council Chambers, 3rd floor of CIty Hall at
] 12 S Osceola Avenue, Clearwater
If you have any questIOns, please do not hesItate to call me at 727-562-4504
Smcerely,
~~:: w':!s: ~~
Planner III
S lPlmmlllg DepartmellllC D BIFLEX1Pelldwg ca!;esIUpfor lire /lexl CDBlKoySlolle N 0115 Cole (LMDR) 101904 CDBIKeySlOne N 0115 COB Leller doe
BRIAN J I\UNG'iT, Mr\YOR-CO\I,I1I~S[ONFR
Hon lli\J';lIl TON, VleF MAYOR COMM1~SIONFR WHITNF'r GRA\ CO\t\II';'>lO,\LR
FRM'K HIBBARD, COMi\lI"SlONhR * I~I[I JON~Or-, COMi\II'~IONFK
"EQUAl F M PI OYJ\1r N I AN D Alii RMA llVI AC110N I'M PI OYfR"
""
1I1fJJJ}TQJr-l';
t ~~'t~lQ; r/{(;r...
\~~ ~","U"llli'7x...
~~v.., rtif~.[~-
~~."\II "" .,,'":..
q ~'::-(--\.~... ~
..€'ii. = '" ~""
"'~;.~ ,> QIl
... ~"" ---== - ~Il
~n"'~~~ j.(~to~,;\
';TIf?"'" ~~"
........'" "., TE\\, ""
"88411,1>
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
POS1 OHICE Box 4748, CLEARWAHR, F10RlDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVlCFS BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLE.A.RWATrR, FLORIDA 33756
TFLFPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
LONG RANGF PLANNING
DEVELOPMhNT RFV1EW
July 9,2004
Mr David Cote
M rs Sharon Cote
III N Keystone Dnve
Clearwater, FL 33755
Rc FLD2004-06044, 115 N Keystone Dnve
Dear My and Mrs Cote
The Plannmg staff has reviewed your applIcatIOn for FlexIble Dcvelopment approval for the
TermmatIOn of Status of Nonconfanmty for densIty for the purpose of addmg a three-car garage,
under the provisions of SectIOn 6-109 at 115 N Keystone Dnve After a prelllmnary reVIew of
the submItted documents, staff has determmed that the applicatIOn IS complete
The Development Review Committee Will review the applIcatIOn far sufficIency on August 12,
2004, m the Plannmg Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the
MUnIcipal ServIces BUlldmg, 100 South Myrtle Avenue, m Clearwater Please call Sherry
Walkms at 562-4582 no earlier than one week pnor to the meetmg date for the approXimate tIme
that your case Will be reviewed You or a representatIve must be present to answer any questIons
that the commIttee may have regardIng your applicatIOn
If you have any questIons, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4504
zomng mformatIOn for parcels withIn the CIty through
www myel em water com/gov/deptsJplannmg *Make us your favontel
You can access
our webslte
SIncerely,
~~~~,~~~
Planner III
S IPlrlnmng Depm /lllentlC D BIFLEXlPenrlmg casesl Up for the next DRCIK eyslOne N 0115 COle (LMDR) 8 12 04 DRClKey,rone NO 115
Complete Leller 7 9 04 rloc
BRIAN J AUNGST, IyL\YOR.(O\iMl~SIONFR
HOY r H \,\11110", VICF MA YOR-COMMT~SIONFR WIiI I NEY G Ri\ Y, COlj \lI,~IO,\ f R
rl~\N" IIUlI1rIRD, (OMMISSIONtR * 13111 JOt,~ON, (0,11.11I,,,100\1 ~
"[QUAI r~l PI OYMrN I ..ND AFI mMA llYF AC110N b\i 1'1 Ol ~ N"
(
,.
ORIGINAL
COB Meetmg Date
Case Numbel
Agenda Item
Owners! Applicants
Address
November 16. 2004
FLD2004-06044
E5
Mr and Mrs David Cote
115 North Keystone Dnve
CITY OF CLEAR\VATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
NOTE: Language that IS added IS underlmed and language that IS deleted IS stllkothrough
GENERAL INFORMATION:
REQUEST:
EXISTING ZONING/
LAND USE.
PROPERTY SIZE:
PROPERTY USI!.:
ADJACENT ZONING!
LAND USES:
FlexIble Development approval for (1) the Tenmnatlon of Status of
Nonconformlty for density for the purpose of addmg a twotffi:ee-car
garage, under the provIsIons of SeCIIOl1 6-109, and (2) the expansIOn
of attached dwcllmgs with a reductIOn to the front (north) setback
from 25 fect to 20 feet (to bUlldmg) and a reductIon to the sIde
(south) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to buIldmg), as a
Resldcntlal Infill Project, under the provIsions of SectIOn 2-203 C,
and a reductIOn to the landscape buffer along the south property line
from 10 feet to five feet, as part of a Comprehensive Landscape
Pro gram, under the prov J S Ions 0 f Section 3 -1202 G
Low MedIUm DenSity ResldentJal (LMDR) Dlstnct,
ResidentIal Urban (RU) Category
o 162 acres
Current Use Attached dwelllllgs (duplex)
Proposed Use Attached dwellings (duplex) w1th an attached
twotffi:ee-car garage
North Low MedIUm Denslty Residential Dlstnct, Detached
dwellmgs
East Low MedIUm Denslty ResidentIal Dlstnct, Detached
dwellings
South Low MedIUm Density Resldentlal OISt11ct, Detached
dwellings
West Low MedIUm DenSity Residential Dlstnct, Detached
d we II Jl1 gs
S ta ff Report - Commum IY Development Board - October 19 J 2004 - Case FLD2004-06044
Page 1 of 6
CHARACTER OF THE
IMMEDIA'I E VICINITY: The sUIToundmg area IS prImarIly detached dwellIngs There are two
lots to the east on the north side of Grove Street developed with
nonconformmg attached dwellmgs There are a number of duplexes
]oeated one block north on both sIdes of Drew Street
UPDATE
The Community Development Board (CDB) at their meetmg on October 19, 2004, reviewed the
apphcatlOn The CDB directed the applicant to reduce their proposal to a two-car garage, but did
not spec I fy any max Imum size or height of the garage
The applicant has submitted a revised proposal for a two-car garage with two separate garage
doors The proposed garage budding has been reduced from the orIgmal proposal of 32-foot wide
to 30-foot \VIde ThiS reductIon to the garage width mereases the distance to the east property ]lne
flam 20 feet to 22 feet The 26-foot depth of the garage has not been proposed to be reduced The
22-[00t height to the peak of the garage roof has not been proposed to be reduced The revised
plans mdlcate that each side of the garage will be separated by a partItIon walL each with pull-
down access to the upper attic storage area. and separate drIveways m front of the garage doors
The exterIor of the Q;arage has been mdlcated to be fimshed with stucco-stone panels to match the
duplex at the front (north) comers of the garage The lower sIde and rear of the garage will have
tooled hOrIzontal bed lomts to match the eXlstlllg duplex The upper portIOns of the garage wlil
have plank lap sldmg The wmdows on the lower portIOn of the rear (south sIde) of the garage
have been ehmllldted The proposed breezeway has been changed to a screened porch, showmg
the washer and dryer the applicant had mdlcated at the October 19, 2004, CDB meetmg to be
prOVided wIthin thiS area for the reSidents. with the southem edge to be wall rather than screenmg
Door access mto the western portIOn of the garage would be through the screened porch The
applicant ]S mdIcatmg sldewa]k access from both umts to the screened porch and g31age
ANAL YSIS:
Site LocatIOn and Existmg Conditions: The 0 162 acres IS located at the southeast comer of
NOI th Keystone Drrve dnd Grove Street ThIS 51-foot by 137 5-[00t site IS currently developed
with a nonconfornung attached dwelllllg structure (duplex), located toward the western portIon of
the lot There are presently two dnveways off of Grove Street on ellher Side of the duplex
provldll1g one off-street parkll1g space per Ul11t Surroundmg uses are pnmanly detached
dwellmgs There IS a nonconfonmng duplex ]oeated one halfb]ock the east at 1666 Grove Street
(also zoned Lo\V MediUm DenSity ReSidential [LMDRJ Dlstnct) AdditIOnally, there IS a
noneon form mg attached dwellmg of three dwellmg UI11 ts located on the northwest corner of Grove
Street and North Duncan Avenue (116 N Duncan Avenue, zoned LMDR Dlstnct) There are a
number of attached dwelhngs (duplexes) located to the north along both Sides of Drew Street
(zoned MedIum Density ResIdentJal DIstnct)
Proposal: As a nonconformmg use (duplex), SectIon 6-103 B does not penmt the expansIOn of
the use, but only proVides for norma] mamtenance and repaIr The applicants propose to construct
Staff RepOlt - Commumty Development Board - October 19,2004 - Case rLD2004-06044
Page 2 of6
a 3m~-foot wide by 26-foot deep, twotflree-car garage on the cast slde of the duplex, connectmg
thc garage by a l2-[00t wIde by 20-foot deep screened porchbrcczcway to the duplex, for the
purpose of provldmg the garage and outdoor parkmg for the residents of the duplexrcqUlred 1 5
off :::;treet parkmg spaces per Uillt In order to accomplish theIr proposal, the applicants have
requested to Temlmate the Status of NonconformIty to make the duplex a conformmg use, which
would then dllow for the plOposed gdrage expansIOn Smce the proposal attaches to the pnnclpal
structure, the addition does not have any restnctlon on Size (different than accessory structures that
are restncted to 10 percent of the pnnclpal stmcture floor area) The proposed garage IS 22 feet m
heIght to the peak of the roof, wtthm the 30-foot maximum heIght of MI111mum Standard
Devclopment In the LMDR DIstnct The applicants deSire to allow for storage over the garage
park111g
Under the TenmnatlOn of Status of Nonconfonmty provIsions, there are four reqUired
Improvements
InstallatIon of pen meter buffers As attached dwellIngs adjacent to detached dwelhngs and
]ocal streets, 10-foot Wide landscape buffers are reqUired The site meets the 10-foot
buffers adjacent to both streets and along the east SIde of the property The applIcant has
requesled to reduce the setback/buffer along the south property Ime to five fcet 111 Width,
whIch IS adjacent to thc apphcant's home
2 Improvement of off-street parkmg lots The applIcant 1S attemptmg to lmprove the off-
street parkmg Circumstances of the property through thiS proposal
3 Removal of nonconfonmng Signs. outdOOl IIght111g or other accessory structures Thcre are
no nonconfonnmg signs or outdoor IIghtmg on the premises There IS an eXIstmg storage
shed In the southeast comer, at undetermined setbacks (only a five-foot sldc setback IS
reqUired from both the east and south property Imes) The proposal mcludes the removal
of thiS shed
4 Use of Comprehensive SIgn Program and Comprehensive Landscape Programs to satisfy
reqUirements Thcre IS no need for a Comprehensive Sign Program, as there are no SIgns
The applIcant has submltted a Comprehensive Landscape Program to satlsfy the requestcd
reduction to the 10- [oat buffer reg ulrement along the south property
NOIl(,on form1l1g attached dwel lings (dup]exes and tnplexes) are located at 116 N Duncan Avenue
(tnplex zoned LMDR, one bloek to the east) and 1666 Grove Street (duplex zoned LMDR, 1/2
block to the east) The applicant has mdlcated 111 their submittal l11formahon that 1625 Laura
Street IS a duplex, yet City and Property Appraiser records l11dIcate the use to be a s111glc-famdy
dwellmg There are a number of attached dwellings on both Sides of Drew Street one block to the
north, but these attached dwellings are located 111 the MedIUm DenSIty ReSidential Dlstnet
The applIcant has also requestcd to reduce the front (north) setback from 25 feet to 20 feet and to
reduce the Side (south) setback and buffer [rom 10 feet to five feet Given the north/south lot
dimensiOn of 51 feet and the reqUlred setbacks totall11g 35 feet, there IS 111sufficlent area to
construct a garage that could house any vehicles (on]y 16 feet left aftcr setback requirements) The
rcductlon to the front setback WIll allow vehIcles to park outsIde of the garage and not overhang
the property 1111e The reductIOn to the Side (south) setback Will allow for a suffiCient depth of
Staff Reporl - Commulllty Development Board - October 19,2004 - Case FLD2D04-06044
Page 3 of6
gal age for vehicles to park wlthm There IS already a heavy landscape buffer eXlstmg along the
sOLlth property lme The eXlstmg stmcture IS located 106 feet from the Grove Street front property
1ll1e AddItIon of the garage and screened porchbrcczc\vay would not appear to have any negatIve
Impact on surroundmg property values (surroundmg property values wIthm Y2 block range between
$69,900 and $122,600, With the maJonty up to the mld-$80's, subject property value currently IS
$72,500)
To ensure the use of thiS addltlOn IS for the use of the residents ofthe duplex, any approval should
be conditioned on restnctmg use of the garage and storage area to the residents of the duplex
Whlle retammg the eXlstmg western dnveway, the eastern, eXIstmg dnveway 1S assumed to be
removed Approval should be condltlOl1cd on removal of thiS eastern, eXIstmg dnveway To
ensure use of the screened porchbreezewuy by the reSidents of the duplex, sIdewalk access should
be plOvlded from the Units The applicant proposes addItIonallandscapmg on the property Code
reqUlrements for proposed trees will need to be met
The redevelopment of thiS Site, WIth enhanced landscape Improvements, will Improve the
appearance of thiS slte and the surroundmg area All applicable Code reqmrements and cntena
mcludlng, but not hmIted to, General Applicability cntena (SectIOn 3-913) and ReSidential Inti II
PI oJect cnten a (Section 2-404 F) have been met
Code Enforcement Analysis: Thcre are no outstandmg enforcement Issues assocIated With tIllS
site
COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: (Sections 2-401.1 and 2-404):
STANDARD PROPOSED CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT
MAXIMUM Two dwelhng umts (exlstmg, X*
DENSITY (7.5 nonconformmg)
dwelling units per
acre) (one dwelling
UOIt maximum)
IMPERVIOUS 042 X
SURFACE RATIO
(ISR) (0 65 maximum)
LOT AREA (10,000 7,038 square feet ** X*
sq. feet minimum for
attached dneIhngs)
LOT \VIDTH (100 North 137 5 feet X*
feet nUOImum for West 51 feet **
attached d,,,elhn gs)
PARKING SPACES Twotfltee spaces (In gdrage), X
(1.5 spaces per UOlt- twofltree spaces In dnveway
attached dwellings;
three spaces reqUIred)
* See AnJ.lysls for diSCUSSiOn
** Nonconforn1Ing
Staff Report - Commum ty Development Board - October 19, 2004 - Case FLD 2004-06044
Page 4 of6
COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA (Section 2-404.F):
ConSistent I nconSI~tcn t
1 The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for X
development IS otherwise economically ImpractIcal without deVIatlOns
from the mtenslty and development standards
2 The development of the parcel proposed for development as a X
resIdentIal mfill project will not matenally reduce the fair market
value of abuttll1g plOpertIes
3 The uses wltlun the resldentIalll1fill proj ect are otheI wise pen111tted m X
the dlstnct
4 The uses wlthlll the residential Illfill project are compatible With X
adlacent lands uses
5 The development of the parcel proposed for development as a X
resIdentIal mfill prOjeCI will upgrade the Immediate VICll11ty of the
parcel proposed for development
6 The design of the proposed resIdentlalmfill project creates a form and X
functIOn which enhances the commumty character of the Immediate
VIClI11ty of the palcel proposed for development and the City of
Clearwater as a whole
7 Flexibility 111 regard to lot Width, required setbacks, height, off-street X
parklllg, access or other development standards are Justified by the
benefits to communIty character and the 111lmedJate VICll1Ity of the
parcel proposed for development and the CIty of Clearwater as a
whole
COMPLIANCE \VITH GENERAL STANDARDS (Section 3-913):
Conslstcnt Inconslsten t
1 Development of the land Will be Il1 harmony With the scale, bulk, X
covel age, density and character of adjacent properties
2 Development WIll 110t hinder or discourage development and use of X
adldcent land and buIldll1gs or slgl1lficantly Impmr the value thereof
" Development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X
.)
resldmg or workmg III the neighborhood
4 Development IS deSIgned to mmlmlze traffic congestion X
5 Development IS conSistent With the communIty character of the X
Immediate VIC1l11 ty
6 Design of the proposed development mll1lrnlZeS adverse effects, X
ll1c1udmg Visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation
impacts on adjacent properties
Staff Report - Community Development Board - October 19, 2004 - Case FLD2004-06044
Page 5 of 6
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The Development RevIew Committee revIewed the apphcatlOn and supportmg matenals on May
6, 2004 The Plannmg Department recommends APPROVAL of the FlexIble Development
applicatIon for (I) the TermmatlOn of Status of NonconformIty for densIty for the purpose of
addmg a tWOH=H-ee-car garage, under the proVISIOns of SectIOn 6-109, dnd (2) the expanSIOn of
attached dwellings wllh a reductIon to the front (north) setback from 25 feet to 20 feet (to
butldmg) and a reductIOn to the SIde (south) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to buIldmg), as a
Resldenllal Infill Project, under the provISIons of SectIon 2-203 C, and a reductIOn to the
landscape buffer along the south property hne from 10 feet to five feet, as part of a ComprehenSive
Landscape Program, under the proVISIOns of SectIOn 3-1202 G, for the SIte at 115 North Keystone
Drrve, wIth the followmg bases and condItIons
Bases for Approval
I The proposal compiles wIth the FleXIble Development crrtena as a ReSIdential Infill Project
per Section 2-404 F
2 The proposal IS m compliance wIth other standards m the Code mc1udmg the General
App IIcabI h ty Cn lena per SectIOn 3-913
3 The proposal complies wIth the FleXIble Development cntena as a ComprehensIve Landscape
Program under the provISIons of SectIOn 3-1202 G
4 The development 15 compatIble wIth the surroundmg area and WIll enhance other
redevelopment efforts
CondItIons of Approval
1 That use of the garage and storage area above be restncted to reSIdent use of the duplex only,
2 That, pllor to the Issuance of a buIldmg permit, the site plans mdlcate the eXlstmg, eastern
dnveway be shown to be removed, and
J- That pnor to the Issuance of a bUlldmg pem1It, the $Ite plans mdlcate sIde'Nalk access be
prOVided from tho Hl1ltS to the breeze'Nay, and
14 That, pnor to the Issuance of a bUIldl11g permit, the landscape plan be reVIsed to I11dlcate trees
meetl11g Code Slze reqUIrements
Prepared by Planmng Department Staff
A TT ACHMENTS
Aenal Photograph of SIte and Vlclmty
LocatIOn Map
Future Land Use Map
Zonrng Atlas Map
AppllcatIon
" II'Im1l1111g DepaJlmeiJrlC D B1FLEX\?end/J1g cases\Upjor the ne.1I CDBIKeysloJle N 0115 COle (LMDR) 10 1904 CDRlKeystone N 01/5 SlllJJ
Report doc
S laff Report - Commumty Development Board - October 19, 2004 - Case FLD2004-06044
Page 60f6
Aerial Map
Owner:
David and Sharon Cote
Case:
FLD2004-06044
Site:
115 North Keystone Drive
Property
Size(Acres) :
0.162
PIN:
14/29/15/46566/004/0010
I Atlas Page:
288B
~
"
I
=.::!!!!!!.-
,
--;
~ ~
122
1 oq;
=j- s
..,
I ~
...lli.
""i
I l.LI
~ ~
E ~
-rLn
l!; 19
U
I~
i-l "'1
1
~~
-1
I I
H
r-I I"'J
1 I
c_~
29
~-,
~ 'J
I I
'-, ~
'-
3o.L-j
'-I
[ I,
r--.J I
I t
L___...
301
,f J
~J .-1
2f]
[--'-1
~ ,
~ 1
L__J'.l
211
21') --
\_1 11
..L_l
~
I-'
301[ I
I
't
'i'1: ~
r -,
I ,
22~ ""i
:t:: ,--,
0 I I
OJ 2191 ""i
:b C- I
;0 1
""t 2/1' I"
:b r-:'1
rii 21LI
,-,
2h:
,-, L_
L1J
<> I ~
~ I~~
-. !.U
,-~--1 ::s;
,-, ]"300 _
I I .....
,_, (I)
I 1~26 Q
I a::
'i oq
r'"'222 :t:
1 r 0
r r' it:
r-l
~ ,2Jt.>
~-~ r~
~ r:
I, I 212
,... ~
I -7 208
L I
'---1
:Q I'"
td.~-_..J~
... ...
~ ... ., ..., " 0\ ~ ., ..., ~ O\"~ i:l ~ " $
~""'1 '13"" :c-lilr"1'l ,..;.,~ 1l Ii:! ...:;; ~--
- ,-...-.....,-t:;,... I'" """1','" 1
I. I I" I U 1:....--....:.
1- I_J--L--1 "-L" -.... ~I -, ,-1
i'-I .,[ J
L ]~_' <jt
r---, \
~ _~ :-,r ~ n_..'{,.
L... '\I) :II"
'-- -......
L-
it r--.
I> 1 I I
Iil; L :~!'i~
...1 "'"
,- ...
I-~
I "'1
-1....1
.--r~L..,
I", I
~-"
.,
~
'" ...,
... ... <1 :;,...,
n'1 r~'i!1 ,~~n 1-121
: I Lt::J LLJ L_::J
L"
r--.
LL. J---' [~l _ .Jl.
LI~ ~ ij '" I ,", 1<>
J05 .... :': \'.l--- ~ !..J~",",- '~-
g.~
i 1
L..I--
Owner I
Site'
.-il
I
L__
'" ...,
-~~ ~--
I 1 _
L~lS l__~
1-' ""-,
1a~I~ I
..... !I-t ~_...l
~
I~--:
[,---uo
, 1
'1*
,-~
I-I
I lux
~-- 1
I, I.\C"
1_'1i:!
~-l
l' ~
" ..I
'"- 3""
'-_:1"
,- ~
L_--,
r, 1--'
, I
1 1
r--]
S011 :
L_l
'I
i' '
221 I
I J
, 1
21~ r
U
r I
LJ
211
r-.....
I 1 ~
~.., I
U302
r'~ f!
1 1 ~
I 225
Lj )0.
hl
220
r"' I ^r
SOf-'i 1L---\7
~---,\ A 01j,7:-1
r-\ 16Vf~
.1" ~I '-' ....1--1
- I I
'1 2p.,
rl
i 2ol0
0._1
r-,,/ 215
/ "
L I
"...J
21'9-,"]
J I
_ _--:r
2?-S-i
L_]
,--1
!._~
I-'
!lI!'\
!.+f
)
~~f/\
/' 21~~ 1
( u
r~ ~--~ L=~
I_~ I~--t ~
DREWST
,~
r-.l
I t~
L--t
-I : ..., ~ci-... J!.-.~ 0\ 1 ~ ~ '" .... ~ ~
,f ! S ~ [.... 1l -1";-:] !t~.J ~ :s--~ ...-~
1 I -. i I 1-- -- 1.... '1 :
L-.I ~- L_" [ r
__ -- L..i- L__
III j I
.....1-)----......., -"'II
....J I 1..1--
L-!~J ! Lr1
GROVE ST
LAURA ST
~ '" "'!X~MD~'D_ '" -~
--~~ r-~ ~-~ ^ __---~
~ ..... I ....., - ~ ,........r-- r .T r _
l_" t- I~.J-J .... ~~/' ~~ l__, ,r I r-
- L._J I I'" '\ I!J-ny.~ -....
- I ....- I' \.n ........ '\'
I I .)" .....,,r- _ ........-.J;
',/' ~ ~ r L
~--I
1 I
L J
rJ-1 !:'
_I I _
L $4 oq
l_ ~ ,.."
*-L 1- r ~
I I I \ ....
!... J-.. .Ir..~ ~
-.___u t.> oq
-, ID
\ I r' JJ
Li 1,.J
u
210
r-~ I .. L__: S\
I L._ L_j r
1 I I \_
!f""f' 11; I ~
... ... ~ L___'
MDR
\9\ l-
I \
\ /'\.. r-l
<.. J> ") ( L_
~~I I !l!
l__~
...
~
~
Ui
d Ch-
Oi!: i ..-...
IT! 1I,~ J !-, ~
~ L!
..... I&l!..'
, ,I
I.f} It) t-. _ Lr)
...a ~,r is-- 18>-.:8 ~- ~-_ ,>>{l
I'" r ~ r ""1'... ,~ ....I (
'L L-...._ ..._~ L, I L, L__ I I
L_ - L_J
I-~-l ,-'
F .-~4-', ,.Jl ,- ~r --- ,...--.... -.1-' ,--- L._J
~ I I I l! !i,- 1 " t-- J~r ~-- Itt i,'1: ~
1._... L...~....
... ~ ... ~- ~ ~
Zoning Map
David and Sharon Cote
Case
115 North Keystone Drive
Property
Size (Acres) ,
PIN
I Atlas Page
,i--i
I ~...l
L~1_1
~~ ~ R ~
t~ :e ::2r- ~12. ;--11
L__ j I I L,,-~J
,-- L_..!
FLD2004-06044
0.162
2M
,---,
S I'
! I
- I
-'t._ 9'
l!t -'- J!
~\~
:5:\~
,
I
I,
I
j
C
f:!~~
......1......
I
I
I
~__J
I 1------
i-I
, ~,
~ ~ I
0 J~~J
~ 14 I
I
~ I I
r J
~ 11_
:b 1
rii J~)
~ I
I ,
I
1&1 J
r -,
I
It I
1"
r ,
I
I I
J~ J
I 1_
,
Il' 'I
L ..r
I n;:::
,--
l_
11
11
lO
14/29/15/46566/004/0010
288B
~ !.U
1 :s;
:E. OC(
Q
I 0
~ ~
~
:g
-3 ~
o
!I
I
I
_I
;J
I
-j
,
J
2tj
r:~l-\
,I I
...__J~
211
"",-, I'
2, ~-
I r "
~_J I 1
I I
"'t__J
;<;
'I 1
21~ r
:t r ~~l
o 21~-'
!f ,-,
~ J7:
-I
:b
~
[~2115\ ~15 \ I
.:.-~~ \ I, I
~ J U
~ I,
~ I 212
~- ~
I -} 2Q8
1.. I /' '--,~
-, I I
I~L L_J l__1 r1.
~~~J~ t11 ~ L_~=~
Iy- 216 ) ,- --' -N2fO
I I --- ~_I
t ., ~5 : -
--J I 1 iii"
_~J ~-
PI ~~-\ 1(fjij~'--
21f:i \ ~.
~; _~ I L': I -,
(c L.:~l,-. _J I
[J 'I I I
I ,-~ l rJ I
...r--~ I I I
Cf ~-=-1 L_~ L--i [if L-,-_J
""'Ii .,......... ~ ~........
r
r--.. L_
L, J
'" I ~
Ii! L~
~rJ~ ~- ~ ~ ~ij,--a cl,i ~,o: ~ ~ ~I ~--~
- .- -~.... ~ ~ ~ ~""'1 ""t ~ ..... ~ - "
l I I L-, I I U III ,.
l_J--...J '-..l .........rl _I r+-l
A tach. d dw ~1I~gL. ~~--j
L'_~ I , ji (. ');.;.,
-- L , ---'
(~ !ft'ml hed.- lwelliti gs., ---" -.,
~ L l~fi~ I ",J 'I ~ [ ~ rvcr...
1-IL_ ~ ~ Li 1__....::: ~~
l~;::"
I ;<.!l
~'...-.1
~ 01 ~
~ r~ r~i:1 r~I~-ii
I Lr1 ~I Lt I : ~ ,
~ I '-_J _J _~.......J
,-~
-,
')
i'
,
l-J D p.tal: bed
d 'Veil ngs
--.. I-I
.J- L_ .... ,-.--..- r-..l l..
:Il~ ,,"10 ['"
j!'j te.--- ~ LJ lil- !--
....,
I
:~
J;<.!
~ 3-
L I
I
r-'" I,..._J-
~~
!,,-,
__J
-,
I
I
Owner I
-.1---1
I ---HO
,_,
D tac ~ed r~ J~
dwell" ~I~/t I c l~
Lfwf
'It r::'R!""-t
1il~116 1
-t .... "'"",,_..J
P I
~ I!!,J
l_j~
~
LAURA ST
'" '" ~ '" "'15
4. rJ;;~-- ---Jil. ,.--~ :'l1l"...J:l.
- ~ I ~ I ~ I ~Il~::j ',", ,...
I I _" J i ...., ,
, r I ..J 1_, ,_I_r ~I ;;t....,
L_rJ -- ~ ~ L_J l.... ~/ 'c,-
Deta;~ ~ (~
~wel ing ~ __;.
~~ -, ~-~, 1 I
r Cl~----:.. ,-- r.J ., I ,....-r-' il',
I:> t.:l. 'It '" ,;:: 152 .. -i I .,,,.
!a...._ 1O~"1l-" ~_ I Iil ;-J
~ ...,., ~ ~ ~ Ii. c__~ 11l--.- 2/
I ~ -~~' -~ r:~'" ,~-'-, I~~ ~
I,... ""'1 1 II....' -ld .--'
Lr.._ L_ I,., 11-1; L_=
,r-T1
I I
C_I I
Site
'1 ~ ~ ~i-~ /~ ~~] ~~ t~ f-~ r~) ~
"_J C_, "-~.1 II~ r I I I
.~ A tache J dwe ~,n- ;sJ-- _L___ ~
~......\ 1 11_ J
~<) \
\ /\. t ch.~dr-I Att~ _, ~ttw hed ------
(-/) ~_~e fi"."J s 1.~:1 d"jihloi L,-l1 well ing~ r-I
.~ ""'! ~ !~ ,I~ 11. \_,
~ ,J
GROVE ST I~~
H)$,n
::i!: ) I
l::J t__
c: --,
::i!: \ ~
~ 1qz~1
r-' - \ I
!._J .... I :
:b 16LJ
Ie ~ ~
~1Ort1 I'
1t ,J ,
,. -1
,J ,
'1 t
Ir
u
-iJ
r -
I I
L-.l
2Jl
210
DREW ST
:z:
~
~
~~,
o Iw;! ! --1 ~ ~
~ I I U-' 'L
:dJ1 -,
, r' -
i;; ~ i~'" '"
",.n ~~ ~-.lit.....
r< ,.., I~ I,., ,~
1......._ ~-- ~, I L1... L__
1) ~tal: lied
11
I I
L_..!
fs-"~L, d ~~I ngs ,. -,_, .:.
\_J LJ I ~ ~,_ ~lr 11-- If'-- ~ ~
\.e:- ... I ~--!-- r.w- I!:!__ _-
;0'0/
'. '
~ ~
r- ~~
I l~
~ ,J
~
r---i ~~ ri--i
L__,__J L.r":. I"', I
L-L...J
De acl ed
;;am ellIng
fL.
~.
1"-'
L-,~
to... ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~r- ~~ r-II
!.__ I I
'-- 1__ "-_J
r--~ r--- Ir~--'",
I -'1l I'" 11:ll L
'-. .......--~ ir-~ JL_~_ I
~ iJ
CLEVELAND ST
( .-~, -~l r:o
~ ~' ,__._ ~]_rr-I
.1 1.-- I I I
r-iJ ri---, i ijj
l,.~ ~ll...r--t I ""1.....
Existing Surrounding Uses Map
I Case'
Property
Slze{Acres)
~~~R
'""1"""11"""1.....
I
I
I
l----J
D
'.1
d~ ~~,gs
lO
r 1~
JLJ
r, II
71' .J
L_..J
~---,
rt_-,"_J
,..--
" \
DaVid and Sharon Cote
FLD2004-06044
0.162
115 North Keystone Drive
PIN.
14/29/15/46566/004/0010
I Atlas Page.
2886
"'=
" ".' "... --
'l\,tbl.".-1" l~ .. - _
,"i:~~~.~~~~:,: ,~. -,
'-..
,..,
View looking southeast at subject property from
intersection ofN. Keystone Dr. and Grove_~!:
, .. 1:..:...
i. 0." r;..._r."
View looking northwest at northern existing dock
View looking north at typical detached dwelling
within surrounding neighborhood
115 North Keystone Drive
FLD2004-06044
View looking southwest at east side of subject
property
- ,-.~ ~:~~;~:;.. .~
View looking east at III N. Keystone Dr.
(adjacently south of subject property)
. .
-
View looking north at 1666 Grove Street (attached
dwellings - duplex)
:) -0
" :::::r. ~
~
> z.. ~
t - (t'
~ i
q
.:., "<.
lJI.
~ -\ ~
1"1, ~
- fl\ ~
~ , t::J-fol..-
-3. ~~
:Y - ""
t "" ~
- ~ ~
. 5:!..
~ ~ -..;;
~ ~ ~
..D ~
~
~ ~
-
~
II
1\
,1
I:
II
I,
i i
I j
I
l
j
,
,
>.
ca..!
OJ:l
Um
-
.. ..
en"
G)~
ca.......
\~
1::.
-...
SJ.I'O
........-......:..- -
1 ..
Q
~ c==:: c:=::::;:'I r It
~ -
? .... \JO
~ ,~,~ ~ ~ IG) 5t ~
- c'
)~ C) t~ ~ ~
~ n =., .....
... ..., ,
...
v.. (;-- ~ '@;. ~- s
[\\ r ....... rI')
t"",' ~1
D )> ........ ~->
1.:"- c
'<" 't,.t C ~ 'L C:J)
~ ""f" .iJ:"o
1>- I~
,...... I
~ 1""7 ~~. .
::o~
~ fJ 1 , - 1,.0'
~
CJ'J ~ ~ ~ m,
I ~
'"
J!>
0.
,
,~
~
~ I
<. -t- N. KEYSTONE DR. t (-":Q~
~
\J\.
-\
I
,
,
.
,
I - I
-
,
-
i
~~
~
I~ :":S
:E
r:::,~
t::::.
~l
l"\s:
x.~
~
. J::
:j
~ ,
?:. -
.
:.. f
- . . r'- ~
.
, ,
~
~
~
"0,
f\'
i\\
~
~
~
- -X47d flc1
01Y/-L-~/X~ _
~
~
~
I
1 ~
1 ~
~ I ~ I ~
I ~r
~~ ~ '-I
! 1 'll
I
I A
- ,.-- I "I
A I I,' I men
- --- "I 1
II ," I I -. ...
1 I in
.....-- 1 I
1 I I
I I 1 110
1 I 1
I I -"
I I I
1 ..j 1 1 CD,<
I ~ 1 1
~ I I
I t 1
'"
I I I
~ i
I .. I
1 r &-. I 'I .;-..
'^
~ .. I I '-
I ll.,
tI/ , l I '"
I I I
I 0 ~ 1 I -.t.
t;:SJ ~ 1 I j
I f'- ~ 1 I ~
1 ~ 1 1
I ~ I 1
I I I tL
1 I C
Q ~ 3
,\ I I
0 I @ I \L
0(\ I
I I I
I I I
.J I
~ "<l"
~ I I
~ =- \l-. ~ I
:;l I t
~ VI I I
<"I ~ "l: I I
-,. ()
~I 1 I
I
~ ~ ~ I
01 I
I 0 1
~I I 1
~I I I
I I
~ , I 1
I 'I, I
11 I I '~
II J
I r-
I I \ I I I
I
L O-9Z
i // /
..)cS - I P [0
p'L
C? r
I' I
'L.._~
-+
i ,rui:I:IJWIIIIIIIIU! . . - - - --
1--7"---- ------ -- - - --- -- - --- --- ~--- ---- - ----
;' "
IL _ _ _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - -...
1111 II III II I lIIftl illTI &),\1 ~--
1 lillll\{\\Il(IIi11l I
"
" I
~~-~
fL.OOIt... f"LA/>! (nrs)--
:5'KttbJErtJ pfj~(.,J.J
HWI fJJt.1K
LAP SIb/Nt,
,
I:l
,
N
o,l
=-- ---
,
..r I ~ {
F~I-olT-- _.::~I;...-e.-vp..T-loN
~~ ~~ 't-if...-c:-,....- O.
l
--. 1>1tIcLO ~1mJE.. PANlLS-'
MkTCA mS7Ii46 Dr}PUi
,
,
- -
-
.. ........._.>.::: ~~.r_ ~~ ..-~
~-
. ~
-
I ::--.....
If Ii
/ /f ::-..... <
~'-
If?' - ~
- ,
I ,
- --- +
. -
- - ... &- .- . - - .
- I . 'I
- - I'
, ,
" --
. ,
1 .. ,
- . . - . I
-
; " I -
.. -- ~ . -
-
.
.
. ~
. . . .
+
!<JEir(<
cLEvA T10M
-.....- ~.
-.......-
__...............~__............,................._.............._.. ....-.-..- .......__....,........,L.,... ~
~~~~~ ~~:_:-='~I-. ~+~~--~=----:::-;..~::. - - . -- -. -~==~~:- - -~
3-.:::::.-. + =- -11.- - -:.. ~- _.- ~ - . --:.::-. - - - -'- ~==-:-- -~.:-:~ -- .:-==
. .... .. __ ...... _ _~___ .. . - - - F1P.1fK.1:1LM~ ~ ~ ._~-;;
_, =_=-=-' ~::-~ ~=.L ,."_" Lit L -..,-- ~~.. -- - ----- - _:: -
_ ..'._"::.=_': ~,~ __ :=:::-~ ","KlI\IDI ~"_.e-~_ _ _ . _ . .+_ _ _ _ -._- _.' - - --"- _-3: ..-
.........._._...._~......____ .................-..:1 ......_.....~......._ ~ - ~-----------_...............~~...............~ ~ --~ -,.. -~
~--~-~. ~:=~::;_~}E::::.: .~: ~ - - :=::;: ..:.::_:.~~-:;.-::..::~~~.-=~ :.:~- =.~ ~~:.~.----~.~::. .-:. ~
_ __,.~~=n ... _=..= ~c-~~.~~_~.O.._ ,.c --,
...~ __...~~_ .",,"""__~fAt. ......~.... ~ ' ~--- ~~~-~---
~ :. ~ _::." ~.. ;:'~..::...;::""::-_..~ ~ -=- ~~...._..__y;~ ~ ~ _:-=-::- :--; -=:-=_"""._ __~ _ -~: "7~ u~ ~=-
~~.-~ -~ ~ ~~-~.., ~~ ~-~ ......~~~ ~..... ~_._- ~~ & "",--
:: :-- rC: _ _'.=--:: ~ ,..:: -- ...::: - -'. - . -. - -. -:::.----.:..-- -.:.: .- -:- .':' -- - - -- --. - - - - -- .
~
~
./
'r
\. .
..........
- fOOL IJM?Pl1J1JTtiL
IJbb JtJ/N (!, - M'+TLH
ttJSl11JEt ~ DUPLEX
,
,
.
-
,
---- ~ "'-
\
. I ,]
.
..
~
..
.-
eMf
~/()e t.. /-It VA 770JJ
~~l7c1L-f?~
.~ - ~" l?~fllbtJ}:;
_ll~l)f- ~ -~~/;iA/ftJA - ~Pn~
~=~~~/~#~
~~~~~
7D~~-~
It) . . :7m;;6 ..,6 -
--lv fturylJ7pw~ - "tCt;J'r'r7-:5~.~
~~~~~~
~~
fiwfHt ~
~~~/:mtn~-~/O~~ ;;-
l~/lf.ti2 ULN:~ hJ7M<~~~--
~;~~/J;i?c( tlltuJ;WlfJX N ac ~ -
Mi/J7~ ~~ ~ ~~ad 1ivn/?/~
-m/~~
III --- . . .
- Z tkfY;?~t?/)J~-U?;~ U'fJIL- # ~/ff!~
~~~ -t#7~~me-~/K)~
;t?ui1~- 1?u>>:'i~ ~~#'-
~)W~'$~
,
~.....- -
...
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Nt)TICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS
The Community Development Board of the CIty of Clearwater, Florida, will hold pubhc heanngs on Tuesday, November
16, 2004, begmnmg at 200 pm, in the City Councll Chambers, m City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Avenue,
Clearwater, Flonda, to consider the foUowlng requests:
NOTE: All persons wishln2 to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meetina. Those eases
that are not contested bv the applicant staR'. nei2hboriD2 property owners. ete. WID be plaeed on a consent aaenda
and approved bv a sto21e vote at the bel!innin2 of the meetin2.
(cont from 10/19/04) David A. & Sharon A. Cote are requestmg a FleXible Development approval for (I) the Termmabon
of Status of Nonconfonmty for density for the purpose of adding ,-tWo.car giJa.ge, under the proVISIOns of Secbon 6-109,
and (2) the expansion of attached dwellings '.!i,th a rl"~~uction to the frOnr(UUI dlr8etback from 25 ft to 20 ft (to bwldmg) and
a reducnon to the SIde (south) setback froin 1\J ft to .5 ft (to bulldmg), as a Restdentlal Infill ProJect. under the prOVISIOns of 1
SectIon 2-203 C, and a reducnon to the landscape buffer along the south property Me from 10 ft to 5 ft, as part of a I
ComprehensIve Landscape Program. under the prp'\"ism:;u: .jf Section 3-1202 G. [Phiposed Use: CvnstructlOn of ii 3 Cdl ~
attached garage m assocmbon With an eXlSbng nonconfonnmg attached dwelling (duplex)] at 115 North Kevstone Drive.
Keystone Manor, B1k D, Lot 1 & 20 FLD200~6!!4tf. , ,
"'~fit
~-;, ........
Interested parnes may appear and be heard at the bearmgs or file wntten nonce of approval or oOJectlOn With the Plannmg
DIrector or City Clerk pnor to the heanngs Any person who deCides to appeal any deCISIon made by the Board, With
respect to any matter considered at such heanngs. Will need t6 request and obtam party status by the Board dunng the case
dISCUSSIOn. a record of the proceedIngs and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings
IS made, wmch record mciJIdes the tesbmony and eVidence upon which the appeal IS to be based per Flonda Statute
286.0105. Conmmmty DevelOpment Code Section 4-206 states that party status shall be granted by the Board tf person
requeSbng such demonstrates that sIhe IS substanbally affected Party status entitles parties to personally tesbfy, present
eVidence, argument and Witnesses, cross.examme WitneSSes, appeal the deCISIon and speak: on recorunderabon requests.
An oath will be adnumstered sweanng all pamclpants m pubhc heanng cases' If you Wish to speak please walt to be
recogwzed, then state and spell your name and provide your address Persons speakIng before the COB sball be lumted to
three mIDutes unless an mdIVlduallS represenbng a group m whIch case the Chauperson may authonze a reasonable amoWlt
of tune up to 10 mIDutes
Five days pnor to the meetmg, staff reports and recommendabons on the above requests Will be avallable for reView by
mterested partles between the hours of8.30 a m and 430 P m, weekdays, at the CIty of Clearwater, Plannmg Department.
100 S Myrtle Ave, Clearwater, FL 33756. Please contact Frank Gerlock, Development ReView Manager, at 562-4557 to
dIscuss any quesbons or concerns about the project and/or to better understand the proposal and reView the site plan.
TIns nobce was sent by the OffiCIal Records and Leglslabve SeIVlces Department, Cynthta E Goudeau, CMC, City Clerk
Cyndi Tarapam
Plannmg Department
Cynthta E Goudeau, CMC
City Clerk
City of Clearwater POBox 4748, Clearwater. FL 337584748
NOTE. Apphcant or representabve must be present at the heanng
YOU ARE BEING SENT 1HIS NOTICE IF YOU ARE THE APPLICANT OR OWN PROPERTY WITHIN 200 IT OF
THE SUBJECT PROPERTY
A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN THE OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE
SERVICES DEPT. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABn.ITY REOUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN
ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN TIDS MEETING SHOULD CALL THE OFFICIAL RECORDS AND
LEGISLATIVE SERVICES DEPT WITH THEm. REOUEST AT (727) 562-4090.
Ad 10/31/04
..
...." - \
Page I 0[2
Wells, Wayne
From
Sent
To
Subject
Tarapanl, Cyndl
Thursday, October 28,2004537 PM
Wells, Wayne
FW Citizen Complaint re Sharon and Dave Cotl, 111 Keystone
mOlL le,ldmg matellal
Cyndt Tarapal1l
Planl11ng DuectOl
(727)562-4547
<..yndl tarapal11@t>,1fyClearwatel com
-----anginal Message-----
From: Tarapanl, Cyndl
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 20049 29 AM
To' Horne, William, Kronschnabl, Jeff
Cc: Brumback, Garry, Wilson, Denise
Subject: RE Citizen Complamt re Sharon and Dave Cotl, 111 Keystone
1111', ,'rphca non \Va~ hcaLd Ht thc Oetobcr 19 CD 13 and wa::. eontll1ucd to thc Novembcl 16 l11eeung to
allow thc appl1cam to r<"V1SC thCll plam to meet the CDB'::, eOl1eOl1S I Will <;end a COP\ of th<.. ~taff repolt
dectrolllcallv to DL01<;C
1 hell h" ~ been nothIng un u~ual about om leYleW and proeL ..,slOg of tl11', ea ~e-d1.i~ I'> a nClghborhood fight
\\ 1[h .., I LOllg flchng.., on both :"llk~ \\ hKh \V LtC c:.-.ptc<;<;cd 111 gl cat detaIl a r the CD B mcctlng
I \Vill \\ alt to hut f1 om Dcm,>c on the meetll1g Thanks
Cyndl Tarapal1l
Plannl11g DlIector
(727)562-4547
cyndl tara p am@M yCic,l1 \V ,1 ter com
-----anginal Message-----
From: Horne, William
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 20048 51 AM
To: Tarapanl, Cyndl, Kronschnabl, Jeff
Cc. Brumback, Garry, Wilson, Denise
Subject: Citizen Complamt re Sharon and Dave Cotl, 111 Keystone
Importance: High
Cyndl/Jef(
Skycrest reSident Joanna Slskm along With four other neighborhood reSidents have
complallled to VM Hlbbard about a I eSldentIal project at 111 Keystone owned by
Sharon and Dave Cot! Complamants allege that CIty staff has approved an applicatIOn
10/28/2004
~- \
Page 2 of2
scheduled to meet the CDB that allows this couple to build a two story struchlre on
their property they believe Will be used 10 VIOlatIOn of OUI code Apparently there IS an
alleged code enfoIcement history assocIated with thiS property owner What generates
thIS emaIlls an allegation that City staff IS corrupt 10 the way we have processed the
COtl'S request and have adVised them every tIme someone has obtamed a copy of
their development applIcatIOn
ThiS group has requested YM HIbbard mtervene mappropnately 10 thIS matter He has
adVIsed the group about hIS role as a councIl member relatIve to staff To get hm1 out of
the middle of thiS SItuatIOn, we will schedule a meetmg wIth all the appropnate staff
plesent to mclude YM Hibbard and the complamants to address their concerns and
questIons I belIeve thiS case meets the next CDB
Del1lse wIll COOl dmate schedules when we have all the names of the attendees Please
give her a copy of the case VM HIbbard wIll coord mate with the group's
representative Thanks
Bill Home
10/28/2004
.
~
~ ~r
Page 1 of 3
Wells, Wayne
From Tarapanl, Cyndl
Sent Thursday, October 28,2004531 PM
To Wells, Wayne
Subject FW CItizen Complamt re Sharon and Dave Calf, 111 Keystone
for meeung ne\.l thur-,day l'hanb
Cyndl Tarapam
Planmog DllectOl
(727) 562 -4547
C\ ndl t<lLapal11@J:vlyClcarwater com
m--Ongrnal Message-----
From: Horne, William
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 20042 37 PM
To; TarapanJ, Cyndl
Subject: RE Citizen Complaint re Sharon and Dave Cotl, 111 Keystone
Cyndl,
Thanks for the I11fOrmatlon I talked to YM HIbbard thIs mornmg and clallfied what he
thought the residents expected to hear from our staff at a meetmg He mdlcated they wanted
to hear sta n ratIOnale for why the project fit wlthll1 the nelghborhood chal aeter cntena m the
code rhey also wanted to dISCUSS why the propeliy owner was notIfied when someone
mqulred about the case application The property owner then IS alleged to have ImmedIately
called the pel son who made the mquIl)' lid hke to get to the bottom of theu concern 111 the
meetl1lg and move forward The purpose of the meetmg IS not to cIrcumvent the nOl mal
plOcess 1l1g 0 f the case unde] our code
Bill Horne
-----Onglnal Message-----
From: Tarapanl, Cyndl
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 1 15 PM
To: Horne, William
Subject: RE, Citizen Complaint re Sharon and Dave Cotl, 111 Keystone
] c.hel '>pcak buell\ \\'1tb Vi'vl J-hbbard bcJOl c hc met \\ nh the cltl7em-told hun of the ~tatu:. of thc
CDB CA<'C, dc I gcncullly told hun why the :.taff ~upportcd and the UO\V1blzmg of the.. gaLagc to (1 2
UlI (l1\~tead of 3 eal)rcqul.:.ted b\ thc CDB ] hope thJ~ helps
Cyndl TarapaOl
Planrung DuectOL
(727)562-4547
cynill tarapam@MyClcaLwater COln
10/2812004
(
",-
-..
J
10/28/2004
Page 2 of3
-----Onglnal Message-----
From: Horne, William
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 11 45 AM
To: Tarapanl, Cyndl, Kronschnabl, Jeff
Cc' Brumback, Garry, Wilson, Denise
Subject: RE Citizen Complaint re Sharon and Dave Cotl, 111 Keystone
Cyndl,
Thanks for the feedback 1'11 pass It on to YM HIbbard
Bdl Home
-----Onglnal Message-----
From: Tarapanl, Cyndl
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 20049 29 AM
To: Horne, William; Kronschnabl, Jeff
Cc: Brumback, Garry, Wilson, Denise
Subject: RE Citizen Complaint re Sharon and Dave Cob, 111 Keystone
I hl~ apphc(lOon wa~ heard at thc Ocrobcl 19 CDB and \Va" continucd to the No\'cmbet
16 mct..t1l1g to allow the apphc31lt to teVI~e thell pLII1" fa meet the. CDBt~ (.once1l1~ I
wIll send a cop" of the "taff tCpOl t clCCtlOllluJl) to DCl11:.c
Thclc has becll nothll1g unw,ual about our 1C\ IC\" and plOCeSS1l1g of rhls ca~e-thls 1S
a n clgh bot hood figh t \\ I rh ~ t1 ong fccl1l1g~ on both '>Ides \'v hleh were c;.. pJ e ~ ~ ed In grca t
detat! at thc CDB meeting
I wIll walt to heat flOm DClll:.c on the mectlng Thanks
Cyndl Tarapam
Hamling DucctoI
(727)562-4547
cynru taiapam@MyClcarwater com
-----Ong ma I Message----~
From: Horne, WIlliam
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 20048 51 AM
To: Tarapanl, Cyndl, Kronschnabl, Jeff
Cc: Brumback, Garry, Wilson, Denise
Subject: Citizen Complaint re Sharon and Dave Cotl, 111 Keystone
Importance: High
Cyndl/Jeff,
Skycrest reSIdent Joanna Slskm along wIth four other neIghborhood
reSidents have complamed to VM Hibbard about a resldentml
project at 111 Keystone owned by Sharon and Dave
CotI Complamants allege that CIty staff has approved an apphcatton
scheduled to meet the CDB that allows thIS couple to build a two story
sb ucture on theIr property they be Ileve will be used m VlO latlOn of our
code Apparently there IS an alleged code enforcement hIstory
,
"'- F- .,
Page 3 of3
assoCIated wIth thIS property owner What generates thIS ematlls an
allegatIOn that CIty staff IS corrupt 10 the way we have processed the
CotI's request and have adVIsed them every tIme someone
has obtalOed a copy of their development applIcatIOn
ThiS group has requested YM HIbbard mtervene 1Oappropnately 10
thiS matter He has adVIsed the group about hIS role as a
councIlmember relative to staff To get hIm out of the mIddle of thIS
SituatIon, we wIll schedule a meetmg WIth all the appropnate staff
present to lOclude YM Hibbard and the complalOants to address their
concerns and questIons I belIeve thIS case meets the next CDB
Demse will coordmate schedules when we have all the names of the
attendees Please give her a copy of the case VM HIbbard will
coordmate With the group's representatIve Thanks
Bill Horne
10/28/2004
.. ,
t~1,1f1"'''J",
,'<1.(. ,,~~ ''f ;;
,....l ~\P,.... ~k
~...":!::: '~II: ;.....~!~......
..I"'~ Il,~-;.....
...~ ~.....rrl}.l.. ...
.~.. ~c:(.
:r:" ~ Q;
~\:-- .' ~~
~flk-"'~~",
.~.)ITE\\,.., '
...,;....
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING
100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVE CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
PHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
CASE SUMMARY
OCL-0013082
115 N KEYSTONE DR
DAVID COTE
duplex rental
PEOPLE
Role
Co - Owner
BUSiness Owner
SHARON A COTE PHONE No Phone
115 N KEYSTONE DR FAX No Fax
CLEARWATER, FL 33755
DAVID A COTE PHONE No Phone
115 N KEYSTONE DR FAX No Fax
CLEARW A TER, FL 33755
DAVID COTE PHONE No Phone
111 N KEYSTONE DR FAX No Fax
CLEARWATER, FL 33755
Owner/P roperty
FEES
HALF YEAR LICENSE
LICENSE FEE - RENEWAL
OCTOBER DELINQUENT 10
Total
Assessed Amount
$14 38
$57 50
$288
$7476
Amount Paid
$14 38
$5750
5288
$7476
Balance Due
$000
$000
$000
$000
OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE
Category
091000 RENTAL UNITS
Quantity
2
# Employees
o
ACTIVITIES
Date 1
Date 2 Date 3
6/20/2003
Done
Dlsp By
DONE KLJ
Issue License - NEW
Override - Parcel Holds
6/20/2003
KLJ
Application received
6/18/2003
KLJ
Renewal Notice
04/05
Second Renewal Notice
FY2003-2004
Renewal Notice
7/26/2004
10/23/2003
7/11/2003
r \FormsllnfoSummary rpl
0CL-tJ013082
115 N KEYSTONE DR
03/04
Issue License - RENEWAL 9/7/2004
2004-2005
OeL Letter Sent 2/6/2004
Resld entlal Rental Hou Sing Educallo na I Materials, updated 1/04
Issue License - RENEWAL 10/29/2003
2003-2004
DONE
DONE
DONE
r \FormS\lnfoSummary rpl
~. ""';J!'
.,1 ~l~'...~~~
,'..! ~ ,,"-. "';:~~
.'!.....""'\ ", ''''?'-::lo;.
:.::s'" ~~zMtt\ .. ~
'<:"":I" "~<('
':.r:a --:;: ~ 1::):
~~ ~-- ~.
>:9~ -- , lS':'
-. "u"-:- --- "',, ,
-- ry, "'it....'"
.~~~~I~~,I., I
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING
100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVE CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
PHONE (727) 562.4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
CASE SUMMARY
COD2001-01561
115 N KEYSTONE DR
Hauling trailer In side yard
PEOPLE
Role
Own er/P roperty
Co - Owner
DAVID COTE
115 N KEYSTONE DR
CLEARWATER, FL 33755
SHARON COTE
115 N KEYSTONE DR
CLEARWATER, FL 33755
PHONE No Phone
FAX No Fax
PHONE No Phone
FAX No Fax
CONDITIONS
3-1407 A 2 b
Met ** HAULING TRAILER IN SETBACK ** A hauling trailer shall not be parked or stored In a residential
setback area -
Done
ACTIVITIES Date 1 Date 2 Date 3 Dlsp By
Complaint Received 4/16/2001 DONE L P
No Violation Found 4/17/2001 DONE JLH
Initial Inspection 4/17/2001 4/17/2001 DONE JLH
Not In setback area No violation
r \Forms\JnfoSummary rpl
..,t""-i
..., to AL ~ ,,"'~~
.\~\ 1I\;",. '7A'":
.......t::::VII~ ~/ ~~~_
.~':,. ,~~ ";.
""'-....,~ I~ Tr'It'j' r~ "II. ...
:~,. ~~:
;.~':. -=-- ""'~..
...... ?Jli:--;";;-""'~I'"
.......[ATE~,\,'
....,..I..~I,t
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING
100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVE CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
PHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
CASE SUMMARY
COD2001-02309
115 N KEYSTONE DR
Hauling trailer no tag
PEOPLE
Role
Owner/Pro pe rty
Other
DAVID COTE
SHARON COTE
115 N KEYSTONE DR
CLEARWATER, FL 33755
SHARON COTE
115 N KEYSTONE DR
CLEARWATER, FL 33755
UNKNOWN
PHONE No Phone
FAX No Fax
Co - Owner
PHONE No Phone
FAX No Fax
PHONE No Phone
FAX No Fax
CONDITIONS
3.150366
Met U INOPERATIVE VEHICLE U Outdoor storage of all or part of any dismantled, partially dismantled,
Inoperative or discarded vehicle, recreational vehicle, machinery, farm equipment, aircraft, construction
equipment, boat. personal watercraft, trailer, truck, motorcycle, bicycle or scrap metal on any public or
private property within the CIty limIts
Done
ACTIVITIES Date 1 Date 2 Date 3 DISp By
Voluntary Compliance 6/1/2001 DONE JLH
Relnspectlon 6/1/2001 6/1/2001 DONE JLH
Trailer gone
Vehicle Notice 5/31/2001 5/11/2001 DONE JLH
Letter mailed 5/15/01
Rei n spectlon 5/11/2001 5/11/2001 DONE JLH
Trailer stili there, no tag Will send NOV for ABV
Initial Inspection 5/4/2001 5/4/2001 DONE JLH
Left door hanger and Citizens gUide
Complaint Received 5/3/2001 DONE CAB
r \Forms\lnfoSummary rpt
rt~ ::D
In 7<'':.,\'' 0 P w
[ % .....r,g1 ro D.-
"'< CJ) D.- Z ('") [~
::l o@ r<l
~I ;::;. g ru {I) " 0...
Cl ~~ {I) '"S- CJ) :3 ;=;.
..,. CJ) CD
,- Cl , {I) z, < (j) P 5 0
......
1 Cl' 9.v 0 (I) ::l ...... 0 ~
~ ' rv 1 Z 2- c (I) ~ ~E:) ~6
~ l Cl ? ;:) to U'1 6
U1 9. (") ~ ~
" ::l Z VI
~~ :, e;. ro 0
", 0 ro
L_ UJ 0 ::l 0 D.- ,^ P.
z Ll ~ 0 -. m ::E
:::l
@ < ro () -:; ::l -< 0 .., 5
0 n 0 ~ :!:l. CJ) ~Ro f Q1J CL
:, ::l 0 Ll UJ 0 0
~ m ~ m m '-I -I (: ~
~ n 0 to !:l. 0 m
~ :!:l. :y 0 c
-' 0 0 (j) z
, -' .... ::l 0 I
'-< m Cl... '-< .... m [;)
I U1 ::l '~& ;;< ([>
Z m 0 ~~' "5"
0 P (j)
~ 7"- ,0 ,:3 (') (j) ':0 :.-
m '0 "-
-< '0 ^ "-
5' I 1-5 ::l
U) , '-< Z
r::r -l {I) ;,3
0 , 0 ~ '1- i([; FEll ~~
>< z' 11 Ifg ':3
~ :1'" 1 , ,00 II=.
110 ~ - ~I , \'-
n , m
a I~ I'~ ' ....
}, I
III I, [ilJ
0 m R q.
() :3 <3
0 (f)
I. 3 1m
TI
{I)
-p , C t'2f
15.:; ::J U
~, {I) Cl... "'"
, 3,) ~ ~
~ ; :0 m
,"I ' Cl...
~, m
1! :PO' (j) 1, U'1 ieJ
TI i:J
,10. 0
~ ~ ,.- ~ :::::; ill :>
-" CJ) I, i:J
m
[] 0
:0 I 0
m I' W "@
o:J .c , ~ ~
~ c C
~ ' m , u
~ D.-
r- , i e ~
{D " .m 1 I' <
:J D.- r0- m \ ~ !!IJ'
{II 0 ~ -
, (f) D.- . '
~ :Il ~ ~
..... m g
.... 0 I'J -<:
:t>- co < ('"J
co 0 0
[] n CO ~~
" 0 Z
-l ~
~, m
w ~1 ~- - I :5:' r 31
::J (I), ~ili ~) r
0... -0 on i Q),
[lj ,(1)0 ro :J I 01 (5 c' ([> J1'
a. ~~ g: ... w' ([> "0 j ::J
~ ~i (1)1 :J !It ' (to z
.,., OZI ".. OZI (to I fB1 fIJ 0/ !i ~
(U (to OZI 0 :J (to ::I'
t2. a.,
>< OZI Ul
~
[]
....
....
z
0
<
(to
3
, r::r
~
.... ~
~ I
'=' ,
0 , I
n I
c
3
(to I
;;:. ,
....
~
h>.
m
~
M
@
IJI ~
IJI
....
"U
,3: i?<
~ .~
.ol,
,,t.;;;
..flll'~6;,.
1"ll,\AllI .,.~##
I\,}. 1;1 .'" '. ~X:
,....t....~,,' ........?~.,L.-.
~.:j; ,I, dfiif~. .. ~
'..-:> :' >""'-' ~:IIII. <( ~
':r::~ -:- _ 0:
':.~\ -=- 9::~
~J'Ik---;"~~"
##,)1TE~",,'
"""11I',11.
CASE SUMMARY
BIZ2003-02419
115 N KEYSTONE DR
PEOPLE
Role
Co - Owner
Owner/P roperty
ACTIVITIES
Rental Education Letter
Violation Verified
Complaint Received
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING
100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVE CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
PHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
SHARON A COTE
115 N KEYSTONE DR
CLEARWATER, FL 33755
DAVID A COTE
115 N KEYSTONE DR
CLEARWATER, FL 33755
PHONE No Phone
FAX No Fax
PHONE No Phone
FAX No Fax
Date 1
Date 2 Date 3
5/29/2003
DISp
DONE
5/29/2003
5/29/2003
Done
By
VON
VON
VON
FAIL VON
5/30/2003 5/29/2003
Inltlallnspeclion
rental 2 Units owner lives In one
Compliance
Remspectlon
6/18/2003
DONE KLJ
DON E KLJ
6/12/2003 6/18/2003
Correspondence 5/30/2003 DONE SSS
property owner came mto obtain permit to build a 30' x 30' two story garage with storage explamed that the non-conforming
denSity would prevent any additions she said that they use the one Side as storage and rent the other Side out left to
diScuss with spouse POSSibility to of converting bUlldmg to sfr so addition could be done 5/30f03
r IForms\lnfoSummary rpl
~,.fI"'I;.iI'
III ~rllq#""
..~~".,.rN";~&_
~~.' \1, zIfIjff\ .. ~
'.:->:' ~'<~-<t::
-r:: ~ Cj'
-:.,..... .. ;:;;::
-;~~~ ,- - ..''''...."
---:'!If.''' .,~~..,
"#,#~TE\\",,1
,,,...,
CASE SUMMARY
CDC2003.01861
115 N KEYSTONE DR
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING
100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVE CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
PHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562~4576
DAVID & SHARON COTE
Buildmg 2-story addition with out permits
PEOPLE
Role
Owner /Prope rty
Co - Owner
ACTIVITIES
No Violation Found
No vlolallOn noted
Complaint Received
DAVID A COTE PHONE No Phone
115 N KEYSTONE DR FAX No Fax
CLEARWATER, FL 33755
SHARON A COTE PHONE No Phone
115 N KEYSTONE DR FAX No Fax
CLEARWATER, FL 33755
Done
Date 1 Date 2 Date 3 Dlsp By
7/1/2003 DONE Mike COCCia
6/30/2003 Mike Coccia
Inltlallnspecllon 7/1/2003 7/1/2003 DONE Mike Coccia
The address In question IS 115 Keystone Dr (8 E corner of Grove St & Keystone Dr)
An Inspection was done today There was no work bemg done at the time of Inspection and no evidence of any 2-slory
structure Property appears to be eXlstmg
Met with Mr & Mrs Cote (property owners) on Site They planned to bUild a 2-story garage but were denied permits due to
zoning conflicts
No violation was noted See photos In document file under code case
r \Forms\lnfoSummary rpl
.. "Y"{
1;1 It'. ~""#~
/'\~~L~_ \"2--
'S::."' ,... ~
.'~,: ;J;-#lJff\ ,,~
'.,..,,' '~<('
':,..-:" ",,--~ Q:
....~\ =:. ,~~
.-..'fJh" . .,~~."
.-~,~l~~) j1 t
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING
100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVE CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
PHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
CASE SUMMARY
CD C2004-0020 5
115 N KEYSTONE OR
Operating a used furniture store/sales out of a duplex
PEOPLE
Role
Owner/Pro pe rty
Co - Owner
DAVID A COTE
115 N KEYSTONE DR
CLEARWATER, FL 33755
SHARON A COTE
115 N KEYSTONE DR
CLEARWATER, FL 33755
PHONE No Phone
FAX No Fax
PHONE No Phone
FAX No Fax
CONDITIONS
1-104 B
Not Met "DEVELOPMENT CODE VIOLATION" No bUlldmg, structure, water or land shall be used or
occupied, and no building, structure, or land shall be developed unless In conformity With all of the
provIsIons of the zOning district In which It IS located, all applicable regulations, and all development
approvals
ACTIVITIES
Date 1
Date 2 Date 3
1/27/2004
DISp
Done
By
L_P
Complaint Received
No Violation Found 3/31/2004 PASS G_P
Since no vlolallOn has been found, this case IS closed Will momtor the property to see If there IS any activity
Relnspectlon 3/31/2004 3/31/2004 PASS G_P
No violation found No sign of any furniture bUSiness
Remspectlon 3/12/2004 3/12/2004 FAIL G P
No Violation found No sign of any furmture bUSiness
Remspectlon 2/28/2004 2/28/2004 FAIL G_P
No VIolatIon found No sign of any furniture bUSiness
Relnspectlon 2/14/2004 2/14/2004 FAIL G_P
On 02/12/04 I vIsited the property and did not fmd any sign of bUSiness activity In or around the house
Relnspectlon 2/7/2004 2/7/2004 PASS G_P
On 02/03104 and 02/07/04 I mspected the property and did not find any sign of bUSiness or any other activity In or around the
property
Relnspectlon 1/3112004 1/31/2004 PASS G_P
No sign of bUSiness or any other activity In or around the property
Inlllallnspectlon 1/27/2004 1/29/2004 FAIL G_P
r \Forms\lnfoSummary rpl
C.P C~04-00205
115 N K(i:YSTONE DR
Knocked at door with no positive answer While inspecting a close by property, a citizen Informed me that the duplex
belonged to the next door property owner After reasearchlng the Property appraiser I confirmed this information I will place
this address on the weekend log to to see If 1 establish personal contact either With the alleged Violator and/or the property
owner
r \Forms\lnfoSummary rpl
Wells, Wayne
From
Sent
To
Cc
Subject
Tarapanl, Cyndl
Friday, November 05,2004 11 00 AM
Dougall-Sides, LeslIe
Gerlock, Chip, Wells, Wayne, Watkins, Sherry
RE FLD2004-06044, Cote Notice
rhnnk.., 1,( ..,he Be pu..'p,ltcd f01 thh to come up at the heal1l1g
Cyndl Tarapam
Planmng Ducctor
(727) 562-4547
C) ndJ tar,lpanJ@i\t[yelealwater com
. --- - 0 rI 9 In a I Messa ge-----
From Dougall-Sides, Leslie
Sent: Friday, November 05, 2004 10 50 AM
To Tarapanl, Cyndl
Ce. Chase, Susan
SubJect FLDZ004-06044, Cote Notice
In my opinion the notice given In the above case IS legally sufficient
i believe the correct descriptIon IS 3-car garage
Although an ambiguity eXists between the 2- and 3-car descriptions, I do not believe It to be fatal as the correct
description IS Ihe greater number and IllS Included/present In the ad
1
Wells, Wayne
From
Sent
To
Subject
Hall, Bob
Fnday, November 05,2004839 AM
Parra, Gabnel, Wells, Wayne
111 - 115 Keystone furniture
Case CDC2004-02786 has been updated as follows
I went to 111 Keystone In an effort to follow up on information about these properties selling furniture
and having a showroom Upon arrival, I met Sharon who Immediately asked me to follow her to a
storage unit at Budget Storage on Drew St Just west of Belcher Rd All furniture I was shown was
from these unIts I also spoke with her about bUYing from catalogues She said they had a furniture
store that went out of business when the Drew St construction was occurring She IS looking for
another location but can't find a sUitable one yet In the mean time, they are conducting the sales
from the storage and catalogues Through thiS process, I have no other Inform.atlon that would
support the allegations at thiS time
Wells, Wayne
Subject
Bill Horne-Hlbbard-nelghbors-Jeff K-Wayne re 111 Keystone
Start
End
Thu 11/4/2004415 PM
Thu 11/4/20045 15 PM
Recurrence
(none)
Meeting Status
Accepted
Required Attendees
Tarapanl, Cyndl, Wells, Wayne
\'(/a\ nc-plca~e plan to bring the enure file Al<;o, I will send you the many c.-malls on thIS to reVIew pllOl to meet1ng
Ba~Ka]h, It 1<; the rC~ldu1b oppo<;ed to the Cotes who want to hu\t wh) cny staff recommended approval of tlm
Note e~peclill]" the allegat10n that ury staff called the apphcant eyely ttme someone got a coPY of the apphcauon-
plca~l dl~eu<;~ w1th me Gefme the meerrng Please undel~tand that I am not bcltevmg what 1~ ~:\1J-Ju<;t want vou to
know the allegations so \'ve can be plepaled Thanb
j;"
Page 1 of3
#
From: Tarapam, Cyndl
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 20045 31 PM
To: Wells, Wayne
Subject: FW CItizen Complamt re Sharon and Dave Cot!, 111 Keystone
for mcctJng next thursdav Thanks
Cyndl Tarapam
Planrung Dlrector
(727)562-4547
cynd1 tarapam@MyClcarwater com
-----Onglnal Message-----
From: Horne, William
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 20042 37 PM
To: Tarapam, Cyndl
Subject: RE Citizen Complaint re Sharon and Dave Cotl, 111 Keystone
CyndI,
Thanks for the infOrmatIOn I talked to VM HIbbard thIS mornmg and clarified what he
thought the resIdents expected to hear from our staff at a meetmg. He mdIcated they wanted
to hear staffratlOnale for why the project fit wIthm the neIghborhood character cnterIa m the
code They also wanted to discuss why the property owner was notIfied when someone
mqUlred about the case apphcation The property owner then IS alleged to have ImmedIately
called the person who made the mqUIry. f'd lIke to get to the bottom of theIr concern m the
meetmg and move forward The purpose of the meetmg IS not to CIrcumvent the normal
processmg of the case under our code
BIll Home
-----Onglnal Message-----
From: Tarapanl, Cyndl
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 1 15 PM
To: Horne, Wilham
Subject: RE Citizen Complaint re Sharon and Dave Cotl, 111 Keystone
I dJd speak bncfly wlth VM I-l1bbard before he md WIth the citizens-told hun of the status of the
CDB case, etc I gcnually told hun why dle "taff wpported and the dOWnSlZl11g of the garage to a 2
cat (mstcad of 3 car)requested by the CDB I hope tlm. helps
Cynd! Taraparu
Planmng Dlrector
(727)562-4547
Crnd! ta.rapam@MyClear\Vatcr com
-----Ongrna I Message-----
From: Horne, William
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 11.45 AM
To: Tarapanl, Cyndl; Kronschnabt, Jeff
Cc: Brumback, Garry, Wilson, Denise
Subject: RE. Citizen Complamt re Sharon and Dave Cotl, 111 Keystone
file I IS \Planmng%20Department\C%20D%20B\FLEX\Pendmg%20cases\Up%20for%20t
11/4/2004
i
Page 2 of3
Cyndl,
Thanks for the feedback 1111 pass It on to VM HIbbard
Bill Home
-----Onglnal Messagen~--
From: Tarapanl, Cyndl
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 20049 29 AM
To: Horne, Wilham, Kronschnabl, Jeff
Cc: Brumback, Garry, Wilson, Demse
Subject: RE' Cltlzen Complaint re Sharon and Dave Cotl, 111 Keystone
'11u~ apphcatlOn wa~ heard at the October 19 CDB and <,\,a., cOflt1nued to the November
16 mcctmg to allow the applKant to rC\1SC thClI plam to meet thc CDBI~ C01KLU1S J
will ~end a copy of thc .,taff report electrolUcall) to l)ClUSC
There has bccn nothmg unusual about our rc\ JCW and proce'><;1ng of tlus case-tlu~ 1<;
a neighbOlhooo fight with strong feel1ng'> on both ~1oes which wcrc expres<;ed m great
octad at the COB mectmg
1 will walt to heal from Deruse on the meLtIng Thank<;
Cyndt T araparu
Planmng Duector
(727)562-4547
cynd1 tarapa01@MyClearwater com
-----Onglnal Message-----
From: Horne, William
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 20048 51 AM
To: Tarapam, Cyndl, Kronschnabl, Jeff
Cc: Brumback, Garry, Wilson, Dentse
Subject: Cltlzen Complaint re Sharon and Dave Cotl, 111 Keystone
Importance: High
CyndI/Jeff,
Skycrest resIdent Joanna Slskm along With four other neIghborhood
resIdents have complamed to VM HIbbard about a resIdential
project at 111 Keystone owned by Sharon and Dave
Coh Complamants allege that CIty staff has approved an applIcatIOn
scheduled to meet the CDB that allows thIS couple to bUIld a two story
structure on theIr property they belIeve WIll be used In VIOlation of our
code. Apparently there IS an alleged code enforcement hIStOry
associated WIth thIS property owner What generates thIS ematlIS an
allegatIOn that CIty staff IS corrupt In the way we have processed the
CotI's request and have adVised them every time someone
has obtamed a copy of theIr development applIcation
fi Ie I IS \Planmng%2 0 Depa rtmen t\C%20 D%20 B \F L EX\Pend] ng%20case s\ U p%20for%2 Ot
11/4/2004
;;-/;
r
Page 3 of3
This group has requested YM HIbbard mtervene mappropnately m
thIS matter He has advIsed the group about his role as a
counctlmember relative to staff To get hIm out of the mIddle of thIS
situatIOn, we wIll schedule a meetmg with all the appropnate staff
present to mclude VM HIbbard and the complamants to address theIr
concerns and questIOns I belteve this case meets the next CDB
Demse WIll coordmate schedules when wc have all the names of the
attendees Please give her a copy of the case. VM HIbbard wIll
coordmate wIth the group's representative Thanks
BIll Home
file liS \P] ann I ng%2 D Department\C%20D%2 0 B\F LEX\Pendl ng%2 Dease s\ U p%2 Ofor%2 at 11 14/2004
ORlrfNAl
CDB Meetmg Date
Case Number
Agenda Item
Owners/ Apphcants
Address
October 19, 2004
F LD2 004- 06044
F4
Mr and Mrs David Cote
115 North Keystone Dnve
GENERAL INFORMATION:
CITY OF CLEAR\VATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
REQUEST:
EXISTING ZONING/
LAND USE:
PROPERTY SIZE:
PROPERTY USE:
ADJACENT ZONING/
LAND USES:
FleXible Development approval for (1) the Termmatlon of Status of
Nonconfoflmty for densIty for the purpose of addmg a three-car
garage, under the provIsions of SectlOn 6-109, and (2) the expansion
of attached dwelhngs with a reductIOn to the front (north) setback
from 25 feet to 20 feet (to bUilding) and a reduction to the side
(south) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to bUlldmg), as a
ResIdentlal Infill Project, under the provIsIOns of SectlOn 2-203 C,
and a reductIon to the landscape buffer along the south property lme
from 10 feet to five feet, as part of a Comprehensive Landscape
Program, under the provlSlons of Section 3-1202 G
Low MedlUm Density Resldentml (LMDR) Dlstnct,
ResidentIal Urban (RU) Category
o 162 acres
Current Use Attached dwelhngs (duplex)
Proposed Use Attached dwellIngs (duplex) with an attached three-
car garage
North Low MedIUm DensIty ResIdentlal Dlstnct, Detached
dwellIngs
East Low MedIUm DensIty Residential Dlstnct, Detached
dwellmgs
South Low MedIUm Density ResIdential Dlstnct, Detached
dwellmgs
West Low MedIUm Density ResidentIal Dlstnct, Detached
dwellmgs
SId ff Report - Commumty Development Board - October 19, 2004 - Case FLD2004-0G044
Page 1 of6
CHARACTER OF THE
IMMEDIATE VICINITY: The surroundmg area IS pnmanly detached dwellings There are two
lots to the east on the north SIde of Grove Street developed wIth
nonconfonnmg attached dwellIngs There arc a number of duplexes
located one block north on both Sides of Drew Street
ANAL YSIS:
Site Location and Existing ConditIOns: The 0 162 acres IS located at the southeast comer of
North Keystone Dnve and Grove Street This 51-foot by 137 5-foot Site IS currently developed
with a nonconfonnmg attached dwell1ng structure (duplex), located toward the western portIon of
the lot There are presently two dnveways off of Grove Street on either SIde of the duplex
provldmg one off-street parkmg space per umt Surroundmg uses are pnmanly detached
dwellmgs There IS a nonconfonmng duplex located one half block the east at 1666 Grove Street
(also zoned Low MedIUm Density ResldentJal [LMDRJ DistrIct) Additionally, there IS a
Ilonconfonnmg attached dwellmg of three dwelltng U111tS located on the northwest comer of Grove
Street and North Duncan Avenue (116 N Duncan Avenue, zoned LMDR Dlstnct) There are a
number of attached dwellmgs (duplexes) located to the north along both Sides of Drew Street
(zoned MedIUm DenSIty ReSidentIal Dlstnct)
Proposal: As a nonconformmg use (duplex), SectIOn 6-103 B does not permit the expansIOn of
the use, but only proVIdes for normal mamtenance and repair The apphcants propose to construct
d 32-foot Wide by 26-[00t deep, three-car garage on the east Side of the duplex, eonnectmg the
garage by a 12-foot Wide by 20-foot deep breezeway to the duplex, for the purpose of provldmg
the reqUIred I 5 off-street parkmg spaces per umt In order to accomplish their proposal, the
applicants have requested to Tennmate the Status of Nonconformity to make the duplex a
confonmng use, wlllch would then allow for the proposed garage expansIOn Smce the proposal
attaches to the prmclpal structure, the addItlOn does not have any restnctlon on Slze (dIfferent than
accessory structures that are restneted to 10 percent of the pnncIpal structure floor area) The
proposed garage IS 22 feet In height to the peak of the roof, WithIn the 30-foot maxImum height of
Mlmmum Standard Development m the LMDR Dlstnct The apphcants deSire to allow for storage
over the garage parkmg
Under the TennmatlOn of Status of Nonconformity proVIsIons, there are four reqUired
Improvements
Installation of pen meter buffers As attached dwellll1gs adjacent to detached dwellings and
local streets, 10-foot WIde landscape buffers are reqUIred The SIte meets the 1 a-foot
buffers adjacent to both streets and along the east Side of the property The apphcant has
requested to reduce the setbacklbuffer along the south property hne to five feet 111 wldth,
which IS adjacent to the applIcant's home
2 Improvement of off-street parkmg lots The apphcant IS attemptll1g to Improve the off-
street parkmg circumstances of the property through thiS proposal
3 Removal ofnonconfom1mg Signs. outdoor hghtll1g or other accessory structures There are
no nonconformIng SIgns or outdoor hghtmg on the premises There IS an eXIstIng storage
Staff Report - Commumty Development Board - October 19, 2004 - Case FLD2004-06044
Page 2 of 6
shed III the southeast comer, at undetermined setbacks (only a five-foot side setback IS
reqUired from both the east and south property hnes) The proposal mcludes the removal
of this shed
4 Use of ComprehensIve Sign Program and ComprehensIve Landscape Programs to satisfy
reqUIrements There IS no need for a Comprehensive SIgn Program, as there are no SIgnS
The appl1cant has submitted a Comprehensive Landscape Program to satisfy the 10-foot
buffer reqUIrement along the south property
Nonconformlllg attached dwellings (duplexes and tnplexes) are located at 116 N Duncan Avenue
(tllplex zoned LMDR, one block to the east) and 1666 Grove Street (duplex zoned LMDR, 1/2
block to the east) The applicant has indicated III theIr submIttal mformatlOll that 1625 Laura
Street IS a duplcx, yet City and Property AppraIser records mdlcate the use to be a smgle-famlly
dwellmg There are a number of attached dwellings on both SIdes of Drew Street one block to the
north, but these attached dwellmgs are located m the MedIUm Density Residential DIstnct
The applicant has also requested to reduce the front (north) setback from 25 feet to 20 feet and to
reduce the SIde (south) setback and buffer from 10 feet to five feet GIven the north/south lot
dllnenslon of 51 feet and the reqUired setbacks totalmg 35 feet, there IS inSUffiCIent area to
construct a garage that could house any vehicles (only 16 feet left after setback reqUIrements) The
reductIon to the front setback will allow vehicles to park outside of the garage and not overhang
the property line The reduction to the Side (south) setback wlll allow for a suffiCIent depth of
garage for vehicles to park wIthm There IS already a heavy landscape buffer eXlstmg along the
south property lme The eXlstlllg structure IS located 106 feet [rom the Grove Street front property
Ime Addition of the garage and breezeway would not appear to have any negative Impact on
sunoundmg plOperty values (surroundmg property values wlthm Y2 block range between $69,900
and $122,600, with the maJonty up to the mld-$80's, subject property value currently lS $72,500)
To ensure the use of thIS additIon IS for the use of the reSidents of the duplex, any approval should
be conditioned on restnctmg use of the garage and storage area to the reSidents of the duplex
While retammg the eXisting western dnveway, the eastern, eXisting dnveway IS assumed to be
removed Approval should be conditIOned on removal of thIS eastern, eXlstmg dnveway To
ensure use of the breezeway by the reSidents of the duplex, Sidewalk access should be provided
from the umts The applicant proposes additIonal landscapmg on the property Code reqUirements
for proposed trees Will need to be met
The redevelopment of thIS SIte, With enhanced landscape Improvements, will llnprove the
appearance of thiS site and the surroundmg area All applIcable Code requirements and cntena
mcludmg, but not limited to, General ApplIcability entena (SectIOn 3-913) and Resldentlal Infi]]
Project cntena (SectIOn 2-404 F) have been met
Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstandlllg enforcement Issues assocIated wIth thIS
site
Staff Report - Conununtty Development Board - October 19,2004 - Case FLD2004-06044
Page 3 of 6
COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: (Sections 2-401.1 and 2-404):
STANDARD PROPOSED CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT
MAXIMUM Two dweHmg uOlts (exIstmg, X*
DENSITY (7.5 nonconfonmng)
dwelling units per
acre) (one dwelling
unit maximum) ,
IMPERVIOUS 042 X
SURFACE RATIO
(lSR) (0.65 maximum)
LOT AREA (10,000 7,038 square feet ** X*
sq. feet minimum for
attached dwellings)
LOT WIDTH (100 North 137 5 feet X*
feet . . for West 51 feet **
mIlllmum
attached dwellings)
PARKING SPACES Three spaces (10 garage), three spaces X
(1.5 spaces per unit- 10 driveways
attached dwellings;
three spaces reqUired)
* See AnalysIs for diSCUSSIon
** Nonconformmg
S laff Report - Cornmulllty Development Board - October 19, 2004 - Case FLD2004-06044
Page 4 of 6
COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA (Section 2-404.F):
ConsIstent InconsIstent
I The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for X
development IS otherwIse economically Impractical wIthout deviatIons
from the mtenslty and development standards
2 The development of the parcel proposed for development as a X
reSidential II1fi1l project will not matenally reduce the faIr market
value of abuttmg properties
3 The uses wlthm the resldentral mfill project are otherwIse permitted m X
the dlstnct
4 The uses wlthm the res]dentlal mfill project are compatible with X
adjacent lands uses
5 The development of the parcel proposed for development as a X
reSidentIal mfill project wIll upgrade the Immediate vlcImty of the
parcel proposed for development
6 The design of the proposed resldentral mfill project creates a form dnd X
functlon which enhances the commumty character of the ImmedIate
vlcmlty of the parcel proposed for development and the City of
Clearwater as a whole
7 FleXibility m regard to lot width, required setbacks, height, off-street X
parkmg, access or other development stand,uds are Justified by the
benefits to commumty character and the ImmedIate vlcImty of the
parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a
whole
COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS Section 3-913 :
Consistent
InconSistent
1
Development of the land WI]] be III harmony with the scale, bulk,
covera e, densIt and character of ad acent ro ertJes
Development will not hmder or discourage development and use of
ad aeent land and bUlldm s or SI mfieantl UTI aIr the value thcreof
Development WIll not adversely affect the health or safety of persons
resldmg or worklll III the nel hborhood
Develo ment IS deSigned to minImiZe traffic con estlon
Development ]S consistent with the commumty character of the
Immediate VlClmt
DeSIgn of the proposed development mmlmIzes adverse effects,
mcludmg v]sual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operatIon
]m acts on ad acent ro ert]es
x
2
x
3
x
4
5
x
X
6
X
SlaffReport - COmmunIly Development Board - October 19,2004 - Case FLD2004-06044
Page 5 of6
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supportmg matenals on May
6, 2004 The Plalmmg Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development
appl1catlOn for (1) the TermmatIon of Status of Nonconformity for densIty for the purpose of
addmg a three-car garage, under the provIsIons of Section 6-109, and (2) the expanSIOn of attached
dwellmgs with a reductIon to the front (north) setback from 25 feet to 20 feet (to bUlldmg) and a
reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to bUlldmg), as a ReSIdentIal Infill
Project, under the provIsIOns of SectIOn 2-203 C, and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the
south property Ime from 10 feet to five feet, as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program,
under the proVISIOns of Section 3-1202 G, [or the site at 115 North Keystone Dnve, wIth the
followll1g bases and condItIons
Bases for Approval
1 The proposal complIes with the FleXible Development cntena as a ResldentJaI Infill Project
pel SectIOn 2-404 F
2 The proposal ]S m compliance with other standards m the Code mcludmg the General
ApplicabilIty Cntena per SectIOn 3-913
3 The proposal complies with the FleXible Development cntena as a ComprehenSive Landscape
Program under the prOVISIOns of Section 3-1202 G
4 The development IS compatible with the surroundmg area and wIll enhance other
redevelopment efforts
Conditions of Approval
1 That use of the garage and storage area above be restrIcted to reSident use ofthe duplex only,
2 That, prIor to the Issuance of a bUIldmg penmt, the SIte plans indicate the eXIstmg, eastem
dnveway be shown to be removed,
3 That, pnor to the Issuance of a bUlldmg penmt, the SIte plans mdlcate sidewalk access be
proVided from the Ul1lts to the breezeway, and
4 That, pnor to the Issuancc of a bUlldmg permit, the landscape plal1 be reVised to mdIcate trees
meetmg Code size reqUIrements
Prepared by Pldnl1lng Department Staff
A TT ACHMENTS
AerIal Photograph of Site al1d VICll1lty
LocatIon Map
Future Land Use Map
Zonmg Atlas Map
ApplicatIOn
'I I P/anlllng Dep(lflmelll\C D B1FLtXtPcndtng cme:,IUpfor Ihe next CDBlKeyslOne N 0115 COle (LMDR) 10 1904 CDB\Keyst()ne N Of /5 Slaff
Repoll doc
Staff Report - Conmlulllty Deve lopment Board - October 19, 2004 - Cdse FLD2004-06044
Page 60f6
51./0 ...
1
>., 0
I";
G._ r
O.a
CJca ~ ~
-
.. -- ~ ~ 10
cnca -:\ ::0 -
0 ,,, 6' 1.1'
,> '" I~'" ;-l
me ~iJ < Ir ~ ~
tP \ fTl
Q )>r ,15- ..... t,J\. LI\
I;'
0 l. '0.1 Ii '-\ ~
l(f)
~ l~ V\ Q
::0 -
rn l~ '"
I '" "'7,
rn ~
-; 110'
-- ~ m -I
\- ~
~ '" ~
2:"_ ~ \\l
- {1\ ,F>
~ ~ 0- ~ \
. \
\
--<. ~ :j \
,
v.. '" \
-\ ~ \0 ;
~ :z:..
J--
\\1. ~
;0'< J
'a --c I ,
/"'l ""f'>- ,
- ~ "1:iJ t- \.....--- '
('>. -'" S2~
\ ~ ~z: N...: KE YS J ONE
c" m DR. (. {6?-0~
l?- .:s- o!; U?
~
e.. 0- 'TjZ m ()
om -0
~ 8'
rn ~~ I-->- m
~ N CP ~
- <
""1:..' ;:0::1> .......,
9 ~
I
~
I,
~
II
I
I
I! :j'
I: II
, ,I
1:, Ii
I ! i
I I'
II
II' :
I "
, ,
,II'
'i I I
I 'I
I ,
'I
, I
: I
~
,':~
I : GJ
,j!ft'li2....
~J ("\
.. !l:<>...
~ .. P-"'t
V~.;! l,-",
!.-. ..$
'l:t" r I:L-..g,
r f'l f"
~.,. "-it
(lJ >
:~j ~~~
>t.
a._
O.a
Uta
-
.. .-
enla
at>
me
It
b
~~
1>
("
...
-if\\
:\
-1i I
I'
~~
-\
()
7 1
ZZ (. 0 //
~I
I'- I-
I \, I
I \,~
I I
I I
I
I I
I
I :
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'"111
t; I
\) I
fI I
I
"'\1 I
~ :
f:-I
:;:- I
~ I
'-./
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I
I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I 1;1
I 'I
I /
I I
r .__
C5'>
~
\\I
pl
f\l
C
?(
I
"5 \U f-J'IL -tell ~ "'-
~~\);~
WQ..:~~ ~r\""~ \t) 1<. z.. 1 c
W l..~ ~:) """,,,",\1.... ~ ..,." \ 7 ~
N \)~~ ~ -\) r- t..\.-.- ~ y... ,~ =
N o~~\-.. s.~ LVIo..\~ :> )C.. \'\) ~
? rot'Q~Q."'& 'orUL~ \1... ~ 'Ul =
~ (\:!of ~, a... it. <j~-e.... J L 1\ '2. V =
?~"t. i ~I"~ \~ '1. L.o '=
\ \ 2..:2.... ~ sn
2..70~
~\
\9C
'3'0
2-+0
'b 3 2-
}~I.)
---
2- 9 BS, ~
fI'CTf."~ \ s ~ =- ().~ 2.4
,JIII1,,;
,.., :tJl.l" ';"~
,I..:" '., "" ~k
.;-"!::t jl ~!""k-:'"
_It..'i., ].,1 J7Y1Jl'i ~ ';.
t1j~~... '"'~, 4'1!1i
Or:::' ~<:;)'
~\ -=:=.. ",~.'
-y........ " ~.'
--7 #',>..;;;-;,,~'VV,
~~.)tTE~,. .,1
'''11.-
Conditions Associated With
FLD2004-06044
115 N KEYSTONE DR
Req'd Tree Size Condition
Arden Dlltmer
562-4604
09/20/2004
7/3012004 (A_D) Not Met
Per Section 3-1202 B 1 Code requires trees to be 10' In height and 2 1/2" cal at planting,
ornamental trees can be 8' In height and 2" cal , and palms must be 10' clear and straight trunk at
planting PrOVide list In a Legend and submit for review
CaseCondltons
Print Date 09/21/2004
Page 1 of 1
~ ,
I.'~'"
.", x.Al~ ,;~..
\~...I. ~ ".,. ty{""
...""~ '~llt ~~(;L.~
'~'\l ~~ ~":.
:C'?:.. ..-J~!':t~~' t ~ ~:
~r: -_~Q:
~.....\ -- ~.n:::'.
":.~~, - ,'....."'''
-":':-Ifr: ~- -"~\~f
~~~~~TE~, ,II
",#,~.IIII
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING
100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVE CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
PHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
CASE SUMMARY
OCL~0011569
111 N KEYSTONE DR
THE FURNITURE GIRL
SELLING FURNITURE ALL OF THE FURNITURE WILL BE IN STORAGE, CUSTOMERS WILL ORDER OUT OF
CATALOGS
PEOPLE
Role
Co - Owner
BUSiness Owner
SHARON A W A COTE
111 N KEYSTONE DR
CLEARWATER, FL 33755
DAVID COTE
111 N KEYSTONE DR
CLEARWATER, FL 33755
SHARo'N A COTE
THE FURNITURE GIRE
111 N KEYSTONE DR
CLEARWATER, FL 733755
PHONE No Phone
FAX No Fax
Owner/P roperty
PHONE No Phone
FAX No Fax
PHONE 727-455-2130
FAX No Fax
FEES
LICENSE FEE - NEW
LICENSE FEE - RENEWAL
OCTOBER DELINQUENT 10
Total
Assessed Amount
$63 50
$127 00
$635
$196 85
Amount Paid
$63 50
$12700
S635
$196 85
Balance Due
$000
$000
SO 00
$000
OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE
Category
066000 MAIL ORDER ESTABLISHMENT
Quantity
1
# Employees
1
ACTIVITIES
Application received
Date 1
Date 2 Date 3
1/24/2003
Dlsp
Done
By
JMC
Issue License - NEW
02-03
Renewal Notice
04/05
Second Renewal Notice
FY2003-2004
Renewal Notice
1/24/2003
DONE SLW
7/26/2004
1 0/23/2003
7/11/2003
r IFormsllnfoSummary rpt
QCL-G011569
111 N KEYSTONE DR
03104
Issue License - RENEWAL
2004-2005
Issue License - RENEWAL
2003-2004
9/7/2004
DONE
1 0/29/2003
DONE
r \ Forms\1 nfoSu mmary rpl
Wells. Wayne
From
Sent
To
Subject
Rice, Scott
Monday, September 20,20044 13 PM
Wells, Wayne
RE Resubmlttal of cases for October 19, 2004, COB meeting
Wayne
115 N Keystone - Review complete No engineering conditions
2690 Drew - THE RESPONSES IN THE 8/13/04 LETTER DO NOT ADDRESS THE ISSUES IDENTIFIED IN THE DRC
COMMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS NEEDED BEFORE THIS CAN GO TO CDB
Lei me know If you have any questions
D. Scott Rice
Land Devel. Engr. Manager
727-562-4781
scott.rice@MyC/earwater.com
.----Onglnal Message-----
From Wells, Wayne
Sent' Thursday, September 16, 2004 4 51 PM
To Albee, RiCk, Blackburn, Anne, Buysse, Beverly A, Colbert, Joseph, Dittmer, Arden, Dougall.$ldes, Leslie, Tarapanl, Cyndl, Gerlock,
ChiP, Glenn, Tom, Gluskl, Roberta, Haines, Angel, Melone, Donald, Moms, William 0 , Reynolds, Mike, Rice, Scott, Richter,
Debbie, Schodtler, John, Watkins, Sherry
Subject: Resubmlttal of cases for October 19, 2004, COB meeting
ORe members -
P I a n s for th e following cases have been resu bm Itted for th e 10/19/04 CD B m eetl ng I have placed one copy of the
case resu bm Ittal package on the ca bl nets outs Ide of Room 216 In ou r office for yo u r review (please do not take It, as
we need It for the CDS mall out) Please review your comments/conditions for thiS case In Permit Plan and determine
If they are met Whether the conditions are "mel" or stili "not met," please let me know via emall Please have these
cases reviewed by noon on Monday, September 20, 2004 I have to have the CDS agenda set and sent to the Clerk
on Thursday, September 23,2004 (I Will be out of town on 9/22/04 - 9/24/04) Thanks
FLD2004-06044 - 115 North Keystone Drive (ORC September 9, 2004)
FLD2Q04-0402249 - 2690 Drew Street (ORC May 6,2004)
Thanks -
Wayne
1
S \ENG I NIA UT OCADIA TLAS\288B dwg 02113101 Q1 33 37 PM eadams, engon _ 5-rrerge pc:>
'"'" ~ I { I ~ s }&s.~ ~ ..h:;
1 ~..,,, rJl: ~. ~
110 ~ 1. ",(I~ ~~;
~ J ~ !-..t QI
a i:'" Uili -U l! !iil il Hi!
l'; $.
".. ~H~~P~I~
: ~ ...( ~..~ ::::
~ .... P#
"
..
NN''''
101-
........ VI (Mit
:1>1-
...~'"
~~
~
~
,...
~
=--,,-
~
f ::: '-"
I ~<;;-=
~
.. ~
--'!::!
~
"'"
~
;/
j;
-I
-;;;;;
-, ~
f-
~n
'"
~
.. ..
...--
~
2+-
,... KRUEGER
~'
....
-
....
1
I
I. -
IG
I
....
N
~r I
lDl-
~
3
;:
I
~I
3 I ~
"" ","
..
~
*
;;.
~
~
~~
3
"",-
~
'""14m
I
1 ""'':... '
~ ?( ~ ~
. ..
t
I-'
N
~~ "'-
~rt ~ /f1j~
...
A 288A
~ "= / OS/R
/" ~
-...f.--~-~ ':"~,
'" DL I $1 ~ .. rr ~ ~_ "-. -~ :
~ 1 N I" ;-.. j ~ fRl8 0 U Nil
:= ~ ~ ~ "'"
-:!'i
I ~ ~~ ~ 't I.
~ I~~ I~'~ ~
I J I-
I u,K!!lfOO~ I
T--.J-+I~r-
i i~ I ! ....
In\lNCTOH ~>;f[
~
REPLAT
.., 20 - 41
$.
l!
llEr!m:II<E: DR
105
HCI ij! ...,
I ...
sua L-._-'"
15 II::) '" -
o,.
~
i
r
!
~
~
s.
0:
~
..
::,
m- ~ ~
~ ~
~ '" m"" I ~
! "i; I 1i 11 U , fii
!l.
~ ~ ~ UJ
...'" o,. ~ -f;'
I--~-~
I i:jr\.- ~T _:::
...... ~...... P4
i! HI I
~
I~ ~l! ~l! !!,!
u Im""t ~B -~
'" ....
.. 2~~4fo.=
. i!1< l!
>ElOU5
s.
- - -'f-a !~ tr::~
2' 10': :;!
..""
-z
.......
I,N
tv'" 0
:~ z
I~ Z
c; g (;)
o
....z
l>
I--- --I
('0r
(X)l>
(X)tn
CD
-
o:::U
.......",
'":!>
OVl
.......",
wO
w
..
IM~ j S N
I&I5i!I C'l IV (.01 .....j
/~1!Wt U1 t5e.. r.wlI!il1J"CIl.... : ..",,,I,,~;:.1'
... fq j5:r'C' .... r
~ =
~--~---IR Q ~ t
ltrf1O:;j: _ ~J .... Q .... ifil'1 =- ~ "'~ilfdf l(!'O4" I
"" ~ ::: :: ~ :"" - ~ :::: : ~ ~ C,
~~ ~ .;~: i =~ ~ : :'~ ~ ~i :~~~ I ~ ·
""~;;.1-. 01 IfIft l'B"ZJ:II.; 01 JUt ... -.j ::: I 'Niii""
r,g kBl!!I i:i ::; ~"';'Sm :::;: ~ IU~ j!jlJ'tl ... Ne :-4
~ i~~ ~ -~ ;~' *~~I~ 0
0- ..~ ~ ::o:.~ );:,:: I 51" Ct-; ~ ~ ...
_ ~" (>0>< ~ ~i ~ '\.j;r~:.: '';1....
~ ~ <J KE'fSr<:JHE; DR D I = "U~
~
_ =!;;; ( _ ii", ~~If~" ~ L:::~~
IIA \ Ol ... ~ ....... .." I a
~ N CfI
"50, ~ v.:./ .... ".. ~ r--::r l--'
~ ~o ~rtd r ~ .pf.(l;t ~ CI;I (,..I IMJ .t=.
,...~ _. I
ff.U i[) iCII If&5IIo ~ [b~.... ~ oM ..... ..... "'" I ~
~:- ::: s :.: ~ ~::~ ~ -:"~ ~~~II ~ 0
::;0; ..= -~...;:: ....~~...= ~ .,..
"...,.~ -'0.._.... M'n ~- 01 ,.411I _'
,fN01,I'I l'Sl"Il'<.oi wr1 I ~
:; =:: ~~::: QI W71 If:r.e~ 1It!;:: I ~....+
~ - ""',," - - ,,~""'l.~
:= ~ ,..," 01.. a" Du<eN<.... ~\IOOE. " .. ~~..:.. ~on> I- r ~
~ ~ ~ % ~ ~ , ~ I;; ~ '; .~ ~ ~ ~ -~ \ I ~ ii ~ ~ ~ ~ lEi"IOO l:: lD
S g ." ~ ? _ '""" mU N "'T" ~ '1 ~- ~ ""11 ~
....a........ PU ~ QIQ'CI!l~ m........ iI.oI tu""
! i ;: :: .i';jj.. ~ -.... is ~ t: il.i.ij ~ I--
II. .....1EJl ~_, ~ .,
::: ~ ---ar-~ [t --'ii--:::
ilG"U.; j,uv:;
"'-l "J'II (J.tf..N .:;
iiil~~.r.:iJ; ~
!
tM~~ Qlo ff~i
....~ ..,- - ~
---.ii-:: ..,.... i!
~I _;, ~.oO--m~
....;;; ,,":
u: r: ~ I;:, I;;
11~1 {II ....
1~-i ~ I~~
L- ...
....0;
10
!
~
!S.~1Il
f<ll ~~II~I_
~ 1 :...1 ~ I~H~
JaifI ~~ ~."
:: ~ :~~ ~
jlltoW ~
- ~
ql~ ..+,E t-.,t N.Jt.
1:::1 l;~;'
....~
~ '-"'-_-00
- ~
OII~...,. MU ~ (:II iIff7
e It* :: ~ ~oZl!. ~~
~ fMS; "V' ~ Q::
:: ,... 8 J'5l"llI.;D~ :::: fl'?j1
llllliA ~
..... ;;;
~ ....
..,.,. c;
~~t; ~ ;; ;;;:1;;;
~~I i: 4 : I ':1 .. ~ I ~ ! !:i l! ..
~
...,
llUMCN1
~ll ~1!i}L~ ~
.... .... iIIo. .. .... ..
g~g~~e:
~I YCI ES
i: ~ 0 IO~ ~C;I
!~~I~ ~
.....lUI
~
~
.."
<:
"'"
v;
., ""
~:
~
... -,
= ~
M:: ~
~.... ;;;
"11--;;:--
~
.... :
..... ~
::: ~
::: ;== ~ ...0
~vL
~YE.
! ~ II ~ ~ :: l 0 ~ ~ ~.! "i! m i! ..': ~
Rli iPU" I l.K. B 5 om
S YC ES
'; L:i N: :::; 0 \(Io( ~ m "'" C!'II oUI .....
".. ! II ! 11 ? i! l! ~ .
1;
. ~
""1\.olrl
!_!~l~~!
= g ~\~m -.j ~
!
:. ~
~
:;: So,. l~"i F= Roili ,,51 T"G... ..
!! !Ui~i~ n
..-
~ i!"t"i! ~
_"I_~J!l -:
.. N T "i
.. 1;"'1- '" <i~'"
:;:
"..
... N
I 26 6\
~vL
~
;; ;::
'" ., -
6
3
I
~ r ...
i ~
R
~'E
~
6
- 1
OS/R
SKYCREsr PARK
o ~~t~
~>E/OIJll --.:
~-t;- ~ - b!ll--
~.... .~"'I.) *"i ~
....i ....
p's:"1~:rn
I I I I
..,. \1692:
I I'""
tit:
t:1+
:=
..
1"'1
lrrn
L'"
N
o
z
'"'
...
z
'"'
0'"
"",
....,.
"'''
~8
0"
~~
>,.
'"
:1;:1
,.
~
'"
N
o
z
Z
C>
g
'"
~
,.
....
;:;
z
<>
::;
-<
'"
!l
,.,
<:>
"
'"
o
"
,.,
~
-<
,.
o
i:'\
..,
'"'
~
....
'"
,.
z
;;;;
'"
g
-<
,...
;;::
::;
'"
I
I
I
I
,
3
-<
,...
~
::;
'"
~@
r
1"'1
o
1"'1
Z
o
,...
o
....
'"
5
<>
'"
z
c:
.,
~
:;0
f;
'"
~
V>
V>
'=
~
,...
'~n
~
,...
[00 ,,,.
..'"
.."
".,
".,
....
>00
....
::
.. :;: Iii! iii. IS ~ ...
g ... ~ ""oj' (~~- ....
24 - 65
"..
::
tI I
o
.. "'~D..2 ..
l! i i!
""
.
""
~
It. ""1\.olrl
~~
~
.
~ ~
....
~
::
.. '" (D.. '"
.. h~ ~
"i! i! i!
l! ~
~'IfHIIf
l! ~ ~
~ '"~
;;
o ~ [
" ...
,,"
"..
~
N. ....ns
- ""''' ...
- 2 i
'" l1Dm
~
".~::: .0
,,'.
= ;: ~
m '" (~..
~
~
"""""
I't. \IENOS ___________ _
.... ~
~ .... :is, a: i3 ;;
C ~(~~~~~~v~
~
~
::
....0
ii'
..
li'
. ..
-..
[~
g]
.L
[Ii:;,
~ = !
;ii~
U"_
~~:
on
; "
" "
g[
:!
?;.
~
~i~~i:~lii
!~G'~:III 1"'10: 11::;;>
i ~ ~~~[;i~~
.. n <2q,~
"H~;;;n:.~
~.. ~~ij:f~~ig
~.; lH~[~!=a
~~:~.!~~;Q
~ -.,i! ll(;~::
~ ~5i ~ ;s;?~
/;Io",~Q.~~ ~~
f~~~:ril;&
~ ::l; l: ~l!!
[]~-.~Qt ~
i ;i~1;~~ ~
i~.::r~!J!~3':;
! t2.3 ~ ~:~~
~;~J!~[:!;l
i ~ ~i i~ ~ ~ i
~ ~ IJI )0 ~I.."~:;-
: ~ ;"fi'~x.'"
1-9
"
'"
,..,
~
..,
'"
~ EBz
'"
"
a
D
"
'"
o
"
-
-~
,
o
~
m. 1
- rrD 1
.. 2!..1
~ ::~ :-
iJ...:! f7.t~ I ...,
f7"~ ~
,.., ~ I
".. I ~
- ~~
Ii =
..... fflIi" l ,....
! I ~
~~ r.:::
-.- j;;
""
I-F-
'" ~
- ....J;I ~
~
'----
r=-
~ o,.
"
o,. ~
""
....
N-;;o.
""
~
-
~
,....
"'" ~'
N ~
""
",.
:-~~~
~~
~~~~
.~r
.....~...... t;: i r'<
.....Vll:: n
!~1, 011 1:0
~r~~g a ~
.i~l~1:l a n
ler~i; ~~&i
- 1II!:Ol:::e=- """,2>
hyg -~::a
",. <'l :lI ....
l ~'" ~ b ;:
f!:::.... ~ -'J
,~~ ~ ~ ~
1:"'00
.f-2!!'
I-- !:: -
1'"..
II
V
\
'k
Applicant
David A Cote
115 N Keystone Dr
Cleal\vater, FI 33755
TELEPHONE No Phone, FAX No Fax, E-MAIL No Emal]
Shdron Cote
111 N Keystone Dr
Clealwater, FI33755
TELEPHONE 727-455-2130, FAX 727-461-1649, E-MAIL No Emall
David Cote
111 N Kcy~lonc Dr
Clearwater, F] 33755
TELEPHONE 727-455-2130, FAX 727-461-]649, E-MAIL No Emml
R~\
C;. , · 04
012-'
~~~
."
,'lit
1 :50 pm
Case Number FLD2004-"tJou44 n 115 N KEYSTONE DR
Owner(s)'
Ow ner( s),
LOlutlOn 0 162 acres located at the southea~t COIll(.r of N Keystone Dllve and Grove Street
Atld~ Page 2888
Zoning District LMDR, Low MedIUm DensIty ResidentIal
Req uest Flex I b I e Deve I opment approval for (1 ) the Term I na t Ion of S talUs of N onconform I ty for dens Ity for the
purpose of addlllg a three-car garage, under the provISions of Section 6-109, and (2) the expanslOn of
attached dwell mgs wah a reductIOn to the front (north) setback from 25 feet to 15 feet (to bu lid lt1g) and a
reductIon to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to bUJldmg), as a Resldentm] [nfill ProJect,
under the provIsIons of SectIon 2-203 C
Propo~ed U~e, Attached dwelhngs
Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods CoahtlOn
ASSOCla tlOn( s), Clearwater, Fl 33761
2544 Fnsco Dnve
TELEPHONE 727-725-3345, FAX No Fax, E-MAIL DJw@gte net
Neighborhood Keystone Manor
Assolla ho n( s), Clearwater, Fl 33755
1634 Laura Street
TELEPHONE No Phone, FAX No Fax, E-MAIL No Emml
Presenter Wayne Wells SemOI Planner
Attendees Included Due to Hurtleane ChaIley, the afternoon ~esslOn of the 8112/04 DRC was postponed, but later
cancelled (applicant knowledgable)
Staff 9/9/04 Wayne Wells, Chip Ger]ock, Scott Rlce, Joe Colbelt
Applicant David & Sharon Cote
Other Norma Carlough
l he DRe reViewed thl~ apph{'Jbon With the follOWing comments:
General Engllleenng:
1 1) Site plan as shown has the north arrow m the wrong direction (location of property per address
gIVen IS the southeast corner of the mtersectlon)
2) All uhhty pole relocatIOns to be coordmated With the owners of such faclhtIes as-noted on
drawmgs '[ he pole relocatIOns Will accommodate the proposed Sidewalk and/or dnve apron(s)
I11stallatlon wllhm the flght-of-ways of the adjacent streets City requlIes a 2-ft honzontal
clearance from edge of Sidewalk to any vertical obstructIOn
3) All unused dnve aprons and/or parkmg surfaces are 10 be removed In ItS entllety, by the
contractor, at the apphcant's expense The nght-of-way(s) are to be lestOled wlth new Sidewalk
and sod as reqUlred
4) ProVide a 4 ft public Sidewalk along North Keystone Dnve and Grove Street (Commulllty
Dcve lopment Code SecMn 3-1701)
All of the above to be addressed pnor to COB
Envlronmentdl:
No Issues
Fire'
No Issues
Harbor Master'
1 No Issues
Legal.
1
No Issues
Development ReView Agenda - 1 hursday, September 9, 2004 - Page 39
i
-.
, "if'
L.wd Resources:
I No Issues
Landsca ping.
I Please provide a landscape plan for review
2 Provide a plan that meets the reqUlrements of pen meter p lantmgs 111 Code SectIOn 3-1202 D
3 Per Sectlon3-1202 B 1 Code reqUlres trees to be 10' m height and 2 112" cal at plantmg,
ornamental trees can be 8' 111 hClght and 2" cal , and palms must be 10' clear and strmght trunk at
plantlllg Provide list m a Legend and subrrut for review
Parks and Recreation:
No Issues
Stormwaler'
I No Issues
Solid Waste
I No Issues
...
Tr al fk E nglnccflng:
I 1 Show 20' x 20' sIght distance tnangle on the site plan The trIangles are measured from the
property lllle and must be shown at all access enliJ.nce~ andlOI dnvewJ.Y~ per (City of
Clearwater's Land Development Code Book) Objects wlthmthe sight distance triangles must
not exceed 30" m height from the pavement
2 Provide mlmlmum dnveway length of 20' from face of garage to nght-of-way ThiS could bc
accomplished by shortcmng the depth of thc garage
PI.ljmng'
, ) North arrow pOll1tmg 111 wrong dIrectIOn ReVise
12 Need to subrrut a different applicatIOn due to expansIOn of attached dwellings and setback
reductIOns requested ReVise applicatIOn to FleXible Development - Residential Infill Project
Provide responses to Resldentml Infill Project cntena relatmg to proposal and setbacks deSired
(need to JustIfy the requested setbacks based on the character of the surroundlllg propertIes)
Garage IS proposed at a depth of 30 feet Need to JUStify the depth of the garage s1l1ce setback
reductIOns to the front (nOl th) and Side (south) are requested Also, the lot IS 51 1 feet north to
south, which means there IS I I feet left over someplace that needs to be accounted for Why
can't the garage be reduced 111 depth (to maybe 25 feet)? Also, III order for a vehicle to park
outSide of the garage, normal length ofparkmg space would be 19 feet plus one foot from velucle
to garage doO!, producmg a 20 foot setbac k
AdVise why access mto the garage IS from the outSide and not through the proposed breezeway
PiOvlde WIdth of proposed dnveway Also, why a landscape Island divider between the smgle
Lar and double car garage doors? From a mamtenance and functIOnal standpoInt, It probably
makes sense to elirrunate the divider
J3
J4
J5
Other,
No Comments
Noles: To be placed on the 10/19/04 CDB agenda, subrrut 15 collated caples of the revised plans & applicatIOn matenal addressmg all
a bove departments' conunents by noon, 9/16/04 Packets shall be co 1Ia ted, fa lded and stapled as appropna te
Development ReVIew Agenda - Thursday, Septembel 9, 2004 - Page 40
.'
Applicant
David A Cote
115 N Keystone Dr
Clearwater, FI 33755
TELEPHONE No Phone, FAX No Fax, E-MAIL No Emall
Sharon Cote
111 N Keystone Dr ~
Clearwater, Fl33755 n
TELEPHONE 727-455-2130, FAX 727-461-1649, E-MAIL No Emall V
David Cote ~\..
111 N Keystone Dr..,.(
Clearwater, Fl 33755
TELEPHONE 727-455-2130 FAX 727-461-1649, E-MAIL No Email
Dnlf-
,. ,. 0+
1 :50 pm
Ca...e Number FLD2004-06u44 -- liS N KEYS rONE DR
Owncr(s),
Owner(s)
LocatIOn 0 162 acres located at the southeast corner ofN Keystone Dnve and GlOve Sheet
Atlas Page, 288B
Zoning District, LMDR, Low MedIUm DenSity Residential
Request Flexible Development approval for (I) the TermmatlOn of Status of Nonconformity for denSity for the
purpose of addmg a three-car garage, under the provlslOns of SectlOn 6-109, and (2) the expanslOn of
attached dwellmgs With a reduction to the front (north) setback from 25 feet to 15 feet (to bUlldmg) and a
reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to bUlldmg), as a Residential Infill Project,
under the proVIsions of Section 2-203 C
Proposed Use Attached dwellings
Neighborhood Clcarwater Neighborhoods Coahtwn
AssoelatlOn( s) : Clearwater, Fl 33761
2544 Fnsco Dnve
TELEPHONE 727-725-3345, FAX No Fax, E-MAIL DJw@gte net
Neighborhood Keystone Manor
I\ssoua tlOn( s), Clearwater, Fl 33755
1634 Laura Street
TELEPHONE No Phone, FAX No Fax, E-MAIL No Emml
Presenter, Wayne Wells, Senlor Planner
Attendees Included Due to HUlllcane Chm Icy, the afternoon seSSIOn of the 8/12/04 DRe was postponed, but later
cancelled (applicant knowledgable)
C S Wells, Gerlock, Rice, Colbert
App Cote
'I he ORC revlc''I'cd thiS application With the followlllg comments:
General Englneenng:
1 1) Site plan as shown has the north arrow III the \VTong directIOn (location of property per addless
given IS the southeast corner of the mtersectlOn)
2) A 11 uti h ty po Ie relocatIOns to be coordma ted With the owners of such faclhtles as-noted on
drawmgs The pole relocatIOns will acconunodate the proposed Sidewalk and/or dnve apron(s)
1I1sta11atlOn wlthlll the flght-of-ways of the adpcent streets City reqUIres a 2-ft honzontal
c1emance from edge of sidewalk to any vertical obstruction
3) All unused dnve aprons and/or parkmg surfaces are to be removed m ItS entirety, by the
contractor, at the apphcant's expense 'I he flght-of-way(s) are to be restored With new Sidewalk
and sod as reqUired
4) ProVide a 4 ft public Sidewalk along North Keystone Dnve and Grove Street (Commul1Ity
Deve lopment Code SectIOn 3-1701)
All of the above to be addressed pnor 10 CDB
EnVironmental:
No Issues
Fire:
1 No Issues
Harbor Master.
I No Issues
Legal.
1 No Issues
Development ReView Agenda - Thmsday, September 9,2004 - Page 44
,-
/~
Land Re~ources,
I No Issues
La nd~Ldplllg,
I Please provide a landscape plan for reVIew
2 Provide a plan that mcets the reqUirements of pen mete I plantmgs m Code SectIOn 3-1202 D
3 Per SectIOn 3-1202 B I Code reqUires tTees to be 10' m height and 2 1/2" cal at plantmg,
ornamental trees can be 8' m height and 2" ca1 , and palms must be 10' clear and straight trunk at
plantmg Provide hst In a Legend and submIt for reVIew
Parks and RecreatIOn'
I No Issues
Storm" a ter:
No Issues
Solid Waste
No Issues
Traffic Engmeermg:
I 1 Show 20' x 20' sIght dIstance tllangle on the Slle plan The tllangles are measurtd from the
property lme and must be shown at all access entrances and/or dnveways per (CIty of
Clearwater's Land Development Code Book) Objects wlthm the sIght dIstance tl tangles must
not exceed 30" m height from the pavement
2 ProvIde mmlllTIum dnvewJY length of 20' from face of garage to nght-of-way ThIS could be
accomplished by shortemng the deptb at the garage
Plamullg'
I N olih an ow pomtlllg III wrong dlrcctiOn ReVIse
2 Need to subnut a different apphcatlOn due to expansIOn of attached dwelllllgs and setback
reductiOns requested ReVise applicatiOn to FleXible Development - Resldentla1lnfill Project
PlOvlde responses to Resldent13llnfill Project cntena relatmg to proposal and setbacks deSired
(need to justtfy tbe requested setbacks based on the character of the surroundmg properties)
3 Garage IS proposed at a depth of 30 feet Need to JustIfy the depth of the garage smce setback
reductIOns to the front (north) and SIde (south) are requested Also, the lot IS 51 1 feet north to
soulh, which means there IS 1 I feet left over someplace that needs to be accounted for Why
can't the garage be reduced m depth (to maybe 25 feet)'! Also, 111 order for a vehIcle to park
outSide oftbe garage, normal length ofparkmg space would be 19 feet plus one foot from vehicle
to garage door, producmg a 20 foot setback
4 AdVIse why access mto the garage IS from the outside and not through the proposed breezeway
5 Provide Width of proposed dnveway Also, why a landscape Island dlvlder between the smgle
CJr and double car garage doors') From a mamtenance and functIOnal standpomt, 1l probably
makes sense to elllTImate the dlvlder
Other'
No Comments
Notes' To be placed on the 10/19/04 COB agenda, subrrut 15 collated copIes of the revised plans & apphcatIon matenal addressmg all
above depanments' comments by noon, 9/16/04 Packets shall be collated, folded and stapled as appropnate
Development ReVIew Agenda - Thursday, September 9, 2004 - Page 45
Case No.FLD2004-06044
Community Response Team
Planning Dept. Cases - ORC
q/q/OY
, I
Meeting Date:
Location 115 N KEYSTONE DR
;; gS f!J
Q Current Use:
Q Active Code Enforcement Case ~ yes
Q Address numbe~ (no) (vacant land)
Q LandscaPin9<I9) (no)
Q Overgrown (yes) ~
Q Debris (yes@
Q Inoperative vehicle(s) (yes)~
Q BUlldmg(s) e (fair) (poor) (vacant land)
Q Fencing (none) t@) (dilapidated) (broken and/or missing pieces)
Q P~int (gOOd)8 (poor) (garish)
Q Grass Parking (yes)@
Q Residential Parking Violations (yes) @
o Signage (none) (ok) (not ok) (billboard) IJ / A
o parkin~ (striped) (handicapped) (needs repaving)
o Dumpster (enclosed) (not enclosed) IV / Jr
o Outdoor storage (yes~
Comments/Status Report (attach any pertinent documents)
~~~1l~rX~leWed by G'e& e p.
Telephone L!7J'r
4:30 pm
Case Number FL02004-06u44 -- 115 N KEYSTONE DR
Owner(s) David A Cote
115 N Keystone Dr
Clearwater, FI33755
TELEPHONE No Phone, FAX No fax, E-MAIL No Emml
Owncr(s): Sharon Cote
III N Keystone Dr
Clearwater, Fl 33755
TELEPHONE 727-455-2130, FAX 727-461-1649, E-MAIL No EmaJI
Applicant DavId Cote
III N Keystone Dr
Cledrwater, FI 33755
TELEPHONE 727-455-2130, FAX 727-461-1649, E-MAIL No EmaIi
F'M\
"Il · D~
"t,c..
~.,..~
"'-..,." ;; i;,..-..
LocdtlOn 0 162 acres located at the southeast comer ofN Keystone Dnve and Grove Street
Atlas Page 288B
Zonlllg Dlstnct LMDR, Low MedIUm Density Re~ldentJal
Rcquest Flexible Development approval for the TermlllatlOn of Status of Nonconformity for denSity for the purpose
of addlllg a three-car garage, under the prOVISIOns of SectIon 6-109
Proposed Use: Attached dwelhngs
Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods CoalitIOn
AssoclatlOlI(s) Clearwater, FI 33761
2544 Fnsco Dnve
TELEPHONE 727-725-3345, FAX No Fax, E-MAIL OJw@gtenet
Neighborhood Keystone Manor
Ai>i>OCI3liOIl(S). Clearwater, Fl 33755
1634 Laura Street
TELEPHONE No Phone, FAX No Fax, E-MAIL No EmaIi
Presenter Wayne Wells, SenIOr Planner
A ttendees Included Due to the HUnlcane Charley, the aftemoon session of the 8/12/04 DRC was postponed
However, due to the naIDre of the DRC comments, this case was not scheduled for formal review Applicant was
advised of the conunents
rhe DRe rC\'lewcd this Application With the follo\'I'mg comments'
General Engllleermg.
I I) Subnut an engmeered Site plan 01 suffiCient scale to allow for review
E nVlrollmcntal.
No Issues
Fire.
No Issues
Harbor l'\ilaster
1 No Issues
Legal:
] No Issues
Land Resources
No Issues
Land scapulg'
I Plea~e plovlde a landscape plan for review
2 Provide a plan that meets the requHements of penmeter planungs lJ1 Code SectlOn 3-1202 0
3 Per Section 3-1202 B 1 Code reqU1res trees to be 10' In heIght and 2 112" cal at plantmg,
omamental trees can be 8' m heIght and 2" cal, and palms must be 10' clear and stlmght trunk at
plantlllg Provide list III a Legend and ~ubmlt for review
Parks and RClreahon:
1 No Issues
Stormwatcr
1 No Issues
Solid Waste:
1 No Issues
Development ReView Agenda - Thursday, August 12,2004 - Page 16
"- ,;,....
Traffic Engmeenng
I I Need a site plan showmg proposalm order to give constructive traffic comments
Planlllng
I
2
Submit the proposed site plan at a scale that can be read Include dimenSIOns of the proposed
addItIon and setbacks
for the propelty at 1629 Cleveland Street, the bulldll1g at the rear of the house IS an accessory
structure With garage doOls downstairs and stOlage/sewlI1g room above No dwelling Suggest
revlsll1g photo package to remove thiS address/photo
Other
No Conmlents
Notes TIllS applicatIOn IS 1l1SUfficlent fOl the COB SubmIt revIsed plans at a larger scale (15 copies) by noon on 8/19/04 for revIew
by
DRC on 9/9/04
Development ReView Agenda - Thursday, August 12, 2004 - Page 17
Applicant
FLD2004-06u44 n liS N KEYS fONE DR
David A Cote
115 N Keystone Dr
Clearwater, FI 33755
cIELEPHONE No Phone, FAX No Fax, E-MAIL No Emall
Sharon Cote
111 N Keystone Dr
Clearwater, FI33755
TELEPHONE 727-455-2130, FAX 727-461-1649, E-MAIL No Emml
DavId Cote
III N Keystone Dr
Clearwater, Fl 33755
TELEPHONE 727-455-2130, FAX 727-461-1649, E-MAIL No Email
,,~~
,. ,2, -0+
"fZ.<:.
~'r~
'"
,
f'-......
4:30 pm
I
Case Number
Owner(s):
Owner(s)'
Location 0 162 acres located at the southeast comer ofN Keystone Dnve and Grove Street
Atlas Page, 2888
Zoning Dlstnct LMDR, Low MedlUm Density Resldentlal
Request FlexIble Development approval for the Termmatlon of Status of Nonconformity for densIty for the purpose
of add mg a three-car garage, under the provIsIons of SectIon 6-109
Proposed Use Attached dwellmgs
Neighborhood Clearwater NeIghborhoods CoalItlOll
AssocmtlOn(s)' Clearwater, FI 33761
2544 Fnsco Dnve
TELEPHONE 727-725-3345, FAX No Fax, E-MAIL DJw@gte net
Neighborhood Keystone Manor
AssoelatlOn(s), Clearwater, FI 33755
1634 Laura Street
TELEPHONE No Phone, FAX No Fax, E-MAIL No EmaJl
Presenter Wayne Wells SetHer Planner
Attendees Included Cay Staff Wayne Wells, ChIp Gerlock, Scott RIce, Joe Colbert
Apphcantlrepresentatlve DaVid and Sharon Cote
The DRe reviewed thiS application With the followmg comments:
General Englneermg'
I I) Subll1lt an engmeered sIte plan of suffiCient scale to allow for revIew
E nVI ron mental,
No Issues
Fire,
No Issues
Harbor Master~
I No Issues
Legal.
1 No Issues
Land Resources,
No Issues
La ndsca pmg'
I Please proVide a landscape plan for review
2 ProVIde a plan that meets the reqUirements of penmeter plantmgs 1Il Code SectlOn 3-1202 D
3 Per SectlOn 3-1202 B I Code reqUIres trees to be 10' III height and 2 1/2" ca I at p lantlllg,
ornamental trees can be 8' m heIght and 2" cal, and palms must be 10' clear and straight trunk at
plantmg ProVide list III a Legend and subnut for review
Parks and Recreation'
I No Issues
Stormwater'
1 No Issues
Solid Waste:
I No Issues
Development ReView Agenda -1 hursday, August 12, 2004 - Page 42
J i"
... .. p.,~..
Trattic Engmeermg.
J 1 Need a site plan showmg proposal m order to give constructive traffic comments
.
Planning.
1 Submit the proposed site plan at a scale that can be read Include dimensIOns of the proposed
addItion and setbacks
2 For the property at 1629 Cleveland Street, the bUlldmg at the rear of the house IS an accessory
structure with garage doors downstairs and storage/sewmg room above No dwe\l1l1g Suggest
revISIng photo package to remove thts address/photo
Other:
No Comments
Notes 11us apphcal10n tS msuffiClent for the CDB $ubffi1t revised plans at a larger scale (15 copies) by noon on 8/19/04 for review
by
DRe on 9/9/04
Development ReView Agenda - Thursday, August 12,2004 - Page 43
/
Community Response Team
Planning Oept. Cases - ORC
Case No. F L j) .,100 1./ - aDo 1/ t/ Meeting Date" O? ( I 5" I () y:.
Location: /6 f.I 1(~ S~ 1Jfl
o Current Use:
o Active Code Enforcement caseG yes
o Address number~) (no) (vacant land)
o Landscaping (yes) (@
o Overgrown (yes) ~
o ,Debris (yes) 9
o Inoperative vehicle(s) (yes)~
o BUllding(s) ~ (faIr) (poor) (vacant land)
o Fencing (none)~ (dilapidated) (broken and/or missing pieces)
o Paint ~ (fair) (poor) (garish)
o Grass Parking (yes) ~
o Residential Parkmg Violations (yes)@9Y
o Signage8) (ok) (not ok) (billboard)
o parkin~ (striped) (handicapped) (needs repaving)
o Dumpster (enclosed) (not enclosed) IJ / &t-
o Outdoor storage (yes)~
Comments/Status Report (attach any pertinent documents)
Date r'i'Ot/ RevIewed by
Revised 3. 01, 02-04-03
~ p
~ CUALL Telephone
./
t'
. 'Pmellas County Property Appr~ ~er Information 1429 15 46566004001 I)
Page 2 of5
14 / 29 /
15 / 46566 / 004 / 0010
19-Aug-Z004 J1M 5M1th, CFA P1nellas County Property Appra1ser 13:30'54
Ownersh1p InforMatlon Res~dent~al Property Address, Use, and Sales
COTL DAVID A OSK 10819 OPG, 2Z88
COTE, SHARDII A
115 N KEYSTONE OR
CLEARWATER fL 33155-6123
COMparable sales value as Prop Addr' 115 II KEYSTONE DR
o f J an L 2003, based on Census T r ae t 265,00
sales frOM 2002 - 2003 '
86,800 Sale Date OR Book/Page Pr1ce (Qual/UnQ) Vae/IMp
Plat InforMatlon 4 /Z,OOO 10, 819/Z, Z88 60,000 (Q) I
1925 Book 010 Pgs 011- 0 /0 0/ 0 0 ( )
0000 Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 ( )
0000 Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 ( )
2004 Value EXEMP T IONS
Jus t I Marke t, 12,500 HOMestead' N Ownership % 000
Govt Exerrl N Use '4 000
Assessed/Cap' 72,500 Instltutlonal Exerrl: " Tax Exerrlpt % 000
HJ.storlc Exerrl' 0
Ta,.;able 72,500 Agr1cultural 0
2003 Tax Inforrrlat1on
D1strict CW Seawall Frontage
Clearwater V1ew,
03 M1llage, Z3 0851 land Slze Unlt land land land
Front x Depth Prlce Unlts Meth
03 Taxes, 1,560 55
1) 51 x 138 800 00 51 10 f
5pec1al Tax 00 2) 0 x 0 00 , 00
3) 0 x 0 , 00 00
W1 Umu t the 5ave-Our-HofTles 4 ) o x 0 00 00
cap, 2003 taxes wlll be 5) 0 x 0 , 00 00
1,560.55 6) 0 x 0 , 00 00
Wlthout any eXefTlpt1ons,
2003 taxes wlll be
1,560.55
Short legal KEYSTONE HAIIOR BLK 0, LOT I
DescrlptJ.on
Building Information
http //pdO co pmellas flus/htbm/cgl-scr3?0=I&a=1&b=l&c=I&r= 16&s=4&t3=I&u=0&p
8/19/2004
i
('Pmellas County Property Appr- -er Informatlon 1429 15465660040(\1 f)
Page 3 of5
PlOpert;Ldnd Land Use Code deseTlp-tlOns
14 / 29 / 15 / 46566 / 004 / 0010
.01
19-Aug-Z004 Jl~ S~lth, CFA Plnellas County Property Appralser 13:30 53
Resldentlal Card 01 of 1 Prop Use ZZO Land Use 08 Llvlng Unlts Z
I~p Type' Duplex/Triplex Prop Address 115 " KEYSTO"E DR
Structural
Elements
Foundatlon
Floor 5yste~
E' terior Wall
Roof Fra~e
Roof Cover
Cont~nuous Wall
Slab on Grade
ConcBk
Gable-H~p
Composite Shingle
Quality
Year BUllt
Effective Age
Heatlng Un~t/Spc/WI/FI
Coollng
Flxtures
Other Depreclatlon
Functlonal Depreclatlon
Econono~ic Depreclatlon
Average
1.949
35
Furn
tlone
I)
o
o
o
~ 5torles 1. 0
Floor Flnlsh Crpt/Unyl/SftWd/Terr
Interlor Flnlsh Drywall/Plaster
Sub
Areas
Descrlptlon Factor Area Descrlptlon Factor Area
1) Base AI'ea 1. 00 L 15Z 7l .00 0
2) Open Po rch ZO 81 8) 00 0
3) 00 0 9) .00 0
4) .00 0 10) 00 0
5) 00 0 11) 00 0
6) 00 0 12) , 00 0
Residential Extra Features
Oescrlptlon Dl~enslon8 Prlce Un 1 ts Value RCD Year
1) .00 0 0 0 0
2) .00 0 0 0 0
3) .00 0 0 0 0
4) .00 0 0 0 0
5) .00 0 0 0 0
6) 00 0 0 0 0
TO TA L RECORD VA LU E 0
Map With Property Address (non-vacant)
~~[I][!][S][3]
http //pao co pmel1as f1 us/htbm/cgl-scr3?o=l&a=l&b=l&e=1&r= 16&s=4&t3=I&u=0&p
8/19/2004
'Pmellas County Property Appr~ ~er InformatiOn 14 29 15 46566 004 0(11 f)
1651 1655 1657 I~I 1665 1671
III GROI/ PO\! RO\l G 1/ GROV ,ROV c
KEY 51 at JE 5T S1 5T S ~1 $1
OP
105 1550 16SL1 1658 1662 1666 1570
I<EYSTONE L AUR' ,AUR LAUR AUW'LAUR AUR' l
OR ST 51 51 51 51 51
,
,
163F- 1538
1625 1631 DREW O~EW
f( OREVI ot:EW S 1 -' T
51 '::iT
1541
o~~w
IbL15
DREW
ST
IS\;.'G
GROVE
ST
(EYSIOt
_--- 0 R
\, '-.~
--- \ '- 120 '"
\ \t<E'.'S1Q1'JE
~ Ij 1634,~ DP
J b.;j( \"GRO lit,
GPOVl:\ <::'1 "'-
51 \ '"' '>..
\
\
I ""',
I '\
!
/ PARK \\
" ;
--...
1<" ;-..
--r:[Y5J101\{~ /-----
OR '(545 l
/GRovd 1648
/ S1 lGRQV
/ I 5T
I
21 1625 1531
OVE GROv (,RO\I
,T S1 ST
liD
KEYSTOtJE
OR
,20
Up'
~T
104
f'T I' STOI'>JE
OR
10
KEYSTQNE
DP
~~~~A
ST
1630
L ~YRA
...,T
"r
,
(... PARI< )
./
l
'\. 1645
9" LAURA
'O'5TONE 51
OR ~
~~
~r-Y~ r-5:~_
Page 4 of5
I
51 I
I
--
..::- ,
51
~m~
S1
1661
DREW
51
b6R~~ [fR7~
sl 51
1652
lRO\/
51
1656
GROVE
51
r
d~B?E
51
1655
AUP'
5T
1661
LilURA
5T
I~~ 1671
LAl A AUR
S ST
1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002)
http Ilpao co pmellas fl us/htbm/cgl-scr3?0=I&a=l&b=1&c=1&r= 16&s=4&t3=I&u=O&p 8/19/2004
.
L Plllellas County Property Appr- -er Infom1atlOn 14 29 15 46566 004 00' f)
Page 5 of 5
Pinellas County Property Appraiser
Parcel Information
Back to Search Pag~
An exp-Ianahon of1h1s screen
http //pao co pmellas fl us/htbm/cgl-scr3?o=1&a=1&b=l&c=I&r= 16&s=4&t3=1&u=0&p 8/19/2004
'",
CITY OF CLEARWATER
NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS
The Community Development Board of the CIty ofCleaTWilter, Fronda wIll hold public hcanng~ on Tuesday, November
16, 2004, bcgmmng at 2 00 P m In the CIty CouncIl ChambHs, In CIty Hall, 3rd f1oor, 112 South O~ceola Avenue,
CleaTWdter, Flonda, to conSider the followmg requests
NOTE. All persons W1shml! to address an Item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meetm!!. Those cases
that are not contested bv the applicant, staff. nel!!hborme property owners, etc. wdl he placed on a consent al!enda
and approved bv a sml!le vote at the bel!mmnl! of the meetml!.
I (cant from 10/19/04) 1504 Garden Inc IS requesting a FlexIble Development approval to perrrut retail sales wIthin an
cXlstmg two-story commercial bUlldmg wIth a reductIOn to lot area from 10,000 sq ft to 7,720 <;q ft, a reductIOn to lot wIdth
(west) from 100 ft to 5081 ft, reduchons to the front (north) setback from 25 ft to 19 ft (to eXl<;tmg and proposed bUIlding)
and from 25 ft to 14 ft (to proposed pavement), a reductIOn to the front (we~t) <;etba(.k from 25 ft to 15 ft (to proposcd
pavement), reductIOns to the sIde (south) setback from 10 ft to one-foot (to eXlstmg and proposed bUlldmg) and from 10 ft
to zero ft (to proposed pavement) and a reductIOn to requITed parkmg from 5 to 45 spaces per 1,000 sq ft, as a
Comprehenslve Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provlSlons of SectIOn 2-704 C, and 'a reductIOn to the landscape
buffer along the south property hne from 5 ft to zero ft and a reduclton In the wIdth of the rcqulTcd loundatlOn landscapmg
adjacent to the bUIlding (west sIde) from 5 ft to 3 75 ft, as part of a ComprehensIve Landscape Program, under the
provISIOns of Sechon 3-1202 G (Proposed Use. Ret3l1 Sdles and <;ervlces) at 503 Marshall St., E A Marshall's Sub, Lot
10 & W 'h of vac alley on E FLD2004-02010
2 (cant from 10/19/04) Clearwater Seashell Resort. L C IS requestmg a FlexIble Development appllcal10n to amend a
prevIOusly approved FL 01-01-01 (CDS approved on February 20, 2001) to perrrut an additIOnal 24 overmght
accommodatIOn umts from the denSIty pool (m addltlOn to the prevIOusly approved 250 overnIght accommodatIOn Ulllt'i) as
d mixed use. with a maxImum of 70,000 sq ft of amemtJes accessory to the hotel and a nummum of 400 publlc parkmg
spaces, as a ComprehensIve Infill Redevelopment ProJect, under the provlSlons of SectIOn 2-803 C [Proposed Use. Hotel
of 250 rooms (153 37 rooms/acre on total &Ite), 18 attached dwelhngs (I I 04 umt~ dcre on total sIte) and a maximum of
70,000 &q ft (0 98 FAR on total sIte) of amcmtles accessory to the hotel, dt a heIght of 150 ft (to roof deck)] at 229 and 301
South Gulf view Boulevard and 230. 300 and 304 Coronado Dflve (Related to DV A2004-00002), Lloyd-WhIte Skmner
Sub, Lots 57, 58, 59, 104, 105 & 106 and part of Lots 56, 103, & 107 Ft.D2004-07052
3 (cont from 1Of19/04) ElliS & Co. Ltd a Flonda Llnuted PatnershlP Ii> requestmg a FleXIble Development approval for
the change of use of an eXlstmg automobile servIce station to a 2,266 sq ft restaurant, wIth a reductIOn to the front (west)
setback from 25 ft to 15 ft (to pavement), a reductIOn of the front (north) setback from 25 ft to 15 ft (to pavement),
reductIOns of the sIde (east) setback from 10 ft to 3 ft (to bUlldmg), from 10 ft to zero ft (to extenor i>eatmg wood deck), and
from 10 ft to zero ft (to dumpster enclosure). a reductIOn of the sIde (south) setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to pavement) and
from 10 ft to 2 ft (to dumpster enclosure), a reductIOn In the reqUIred parkmg from 34 ~paces to 21 '>paces, as a
ComprehenSIve Infill Redevelopment Project, under the prOVISIOns of SectIOn 2-704 C , and as part of a ComprehenslVc
Ldndscdpe Program, under the provIsIOns of SectIOn 3-1202 G (Proposed Use. RCi>taurant) dt 2201 Gulf to Bav
Boulevard, Scc 18-29-16, M&B 32/04 and 32/05 FLD2004-08058
4 (cant from 10/19/04) DaVid A & Sharon A. Cote are requestmg a FleXIble Development approval for (I) the
TenmnatlOn of Status of Nonconfonnlty for denslty for the purpose of addmg a two-car garage. under the provISIons of
SeGtlOn 6-109, and (2) the expansIOn of attached dwelhngs wIth a reduclJon to the front (north) setback from 25 ft to 20 ft
(to bUlldmg) dnd a reductIOn to the sIde (~outh) setback from lOft to 5 ft (to bUlldmg), as a ReSIdential Infill Project, under
the proVI~lons of SectIOn 2-203 C, dnd a reduchon to the landscape buffer along the south property lmc from lOft to 5 ft, dS
part of a ComprehenSIve Landscape Program, under the provlSlons of SectIOn 3-1202 G [Proposed Use Construchon of a
3 car attached garage m aSSOCIatIOn wIth an CX1<;tmg nonconfornung dttdchcd dwellmg (duplex)] at 115 North Kevstone
Dflve, Keystone Manor, Blk 0, Lot I & 20 I<'LD2004-06044
5 Allan J Crooker I Lamer Beach Club. LLC / McSmlth. Inc. are rcquestmg (1) 1 enmndtlOn of Status of
Nonconfonnlty for deni>lty (15 overnight acconunoddllon timt<; - to be converted to 11 dwclhng umts), under the provIsIOns
of SectIOn 6-] 09, (2) FleXIble Development approval to pennlt a total of 13 attached dwelhtlg~ ill the MedlUm HIgh DenSIty
ReSldentJal (MHDR) DI~tnct and TOUrISt (T) Dlstnct WIth reductIOns to lot area III the MHDR Dlstnct from 15,000 ~q fl to
8,700 sq fl and m the T Dlslnct from 10,000 sq fila 4,350 sq ft, reductIOns to lot wIdth III the MHDR Dlstnct from 150 ft to
100 ft dnd 1Il the T DI,>tnct from 100 ft to 50 ft, reductIOns to the front (north along Avalon Street - MHDR Dlstnct) setback
from 25 ft 10 lOft (to bUl]dmg) and from 25 f1 to zero ft (to dumr~ter ~taglng pad), a reductIOn 10 the ~lde (we"t - MHDR
" Dlstnct) from Ion to zero ft (to bUl ]dlllg), a reductIOn to the rear (~outh - MHDR Dlstnct) from 15 n to 10 f1 (to bUl]dmg),
a reductIOn to the front (south along Kendall Street - T Dl~tnct) from 15 ft to 10 ft (to bUlldmg), a redu(,llon to the S1(le
(west - T Dlstnct) from 10 ft to zero ft (to buildlllg) an Increase to bUlhhng hE-]ght In the MHDR Dlstnct from 30 ft and In
the T D]stnct from 35 ft to 695ft (to roof deck) wIth penmeter parapets of 3 67 ft (from roof deck) and deGQrdt]ve roof
structures of 10 I ft (from roof dtck) and to pennll a bUl]dmg w]thln the v]s]bllity tndngle~, as a Res]denllill [nfil] Project m
the MHDR Dlstnct and as a ComprehensIve ]nfill Redevelopment Project In the T Dlstnct, under the provISIons of SectIOns
2-404 F and 2-803 C, (3) Reduction to the front penmeter buffer along Ava]on Street m the MHDR D]stnct from ]0 ft to
zero ft (to dumpster staging pad) and a reductIOn to the side (we~t) landscape buffer m the MHDR Dlstnct from ]0 ft to zero
ft (to butldmg), as a ComprehensIve Landscape Plan, under the provIsIons of Sectton 3-]202 G, and (4) Transfer of
Dcvelopment Rights (TDR2004-08008) of one dwelling Ulllt to this ~]te from 32 [ Coronado Dnve, under the provIsions of
SectIOn 4-1402 (Proposed Use Attached dwellings -13 condomm]um UllltS) at 15-17 Avalon St. & 16 Kendall St.,
ReVised Map ofC]earwater Beach, Blk 7, Lots 5, 6 & 14 FLD2004-08059
6 Schlau ProperlJes Co. arc requestmg a Flex]ble Development approval to allow Retal] Sales and ServIce (a funeral
home) as a pnmary u~e m the Office Zomng Dlstnct, wIth a reductIOn of the front setback from 25 ft to ] 3 ft (to pavement),
reductIOns of the s]dc (east) setback from 20 ft to 4 ft (to bUl]dmg and SIdewalk), a reduction of the Side (west) setbdck from
20 ft to 8 ft (to pavement), and a rcductlOn of the rear setback from 20 ft to 11 ft: (to pavement), as a Comprehensive Infi]]
Redeve]opment Project undcr the proVISIOns of SectIon 2-]004 B and as a Comprehensive Landscape Plan, under the
proVISIOns of SectIOn 3-1202 G (Proposed Use Funera] Home) at 1425 Sunset Pomt Rd, Sec 02-29-15, M&B 3206
FLD2004-06043
7 Ocean PrODertJe~ of Clearwater. LLC are requestmg a Flexlb]e Deve]opment approval to penrut retal] sales wlthm an
eXlstmg one-story commerCial bUlldmg wIth reductIOns to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to SIX feet (to ex]stlllg
bUl]dmg) and from 25 feet to 125 feet (to proposed pavement), a reductIOn to the Side (south) setback from 10 feet to four
feet (to eXlstmg and proposed pavement), as a FleXIble Development Project, under the proVISIOns of Sectlon 2-704 N, and
reductIOns to the landscape buffer~ along the south property hne from five feet to four fCG! and a reductIOn III the front
(west) ]andscapmg adjacent to the bUl]dmg (west sIde) from 15 fect to SIX feet, as part of a Comprehensive Landscape
Program, under the prov]~] ons of SectIOn 3-] 202 G (Proposed Use: Retal] Sales and ServIces) at 1 tIS. Belcher Rd , See
18-29-16, M&B 23 03 FLD2004-07054
8 CJty of Clearwater are requestmg a F]ex]ble Deve]opment approval to penn]t a socml pubhe servIce dgency III the
Institutional Dlstnct, wIth devmtlOns to allow a SOCial pubhc service agency adjacent to resldenhally zoned property and to
allow a ~oc]al pubhc service agency w]thm 1,500 ft of an eXlstmg SOCial pubhc service agency, as a Comprehensl ve [nfill
Redevelopmcnt Project, under the prov]SlOns of SectIOn 2-]204 A (Proposed Use: Non-profit educattona] trammg faCIlity)
at 1250 Palmetto St., See 1O~29-15, M&B 1305 FLD2004-08060
9 Robert 0 Ra~ham (owner) Sandra Britton ]S requestmg an appeal of the deCISIon of a Leve] One applicatIon (Flexlb]e
Standard Deve]opment case FLS2004-0503 3), undcr the proVISIOns of SectIon 4-50 I, that approved an apphcatton redUCing thc
front (east) setback from 25 ft to 10 ft (to bUl]dlng), reducmg the front (south) sctback from 25 ft to 10 ft (to bm]dmg),
mcreasmg the height of a wall from 3 ft to 7 ft m the front (east and south) setbacb, as part of a ReSldenttal ]nfil] ProJ ect, under
the proVISIOns of SectIOn 2-203 C (Proposed Use Con,;tmctlon of a detached dwelhng) at 752 Eldorado Ave., Manda]ay
Sub, Blk 4, Lot 1 APP2004-00007
Interested part]cs may appear and be heard at the hearings or file written notIce of approval or objectIOn With the P]anmng
Oncctor or City Clerk pnor to the heanngs Any person who deCides to appeal any deCISIOn made by the Board, WIth
respect to any matter conSidered at such hcanng~, Will need to request and obtam party ,;tatus by the Board dunng the ca~e
d]scusslOn, a record of the procE-edmgs and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatIm record of the proceedmgs
IS made, which record mcludes the testtmony and eVidence upon which the appeal IS to bc based per Flonda Statute
286 0105 Commurnty Development Code SectlOn 4-206 states that party status shall be granted by the Board If person ,
requestmg such demonstrate,> that s/he IS substantially affected Party status entlt]es parties to personally testlfY, present
eVIdence, argument and Witnesses, cross-exarmne wltne~ses, appeal the deCISIOn and speak on recon~]deratlOn requests
An oath WIll be admlmstered sweanng all partiCipants m publlc heanng ca~e~ ]f you Wish to speak please walt to be
recogmzed, then state and spell your name and proVIde your addrc<;<; Pef'>ons speakmg before the COB shall be hmlted to
three mlnute~ unless an mdlvldualls repre~entmg a group In which ca~e the Chatrperson may authonze d rea~onable amount
oftlmc up to 10 minutes
\.
FIve ddY~ poor to the rneetlllg, staff rcport~ and recommendat1Ons on tht, above requests wIll be avaJlable fOf revIew by
l1ltere~ttJ partle~ between the hour~ of 8 30 d m and 4 30 P rn , weekday~, at the CIty of Cledrwater, Planmng Dtpartment,
100 S Myrtle Ave, Clearwater, FI 33756 Please contact Frank Gerlotk, Development RevlCw Manager, at 562-4557 to
JISCU<;<; any que<;tlOns or concem<; about the project andlor to better understand the propo5al and It-VIew the sIte plan
ThIS notice Wd~ sent by the OffiCial Record~ and Legl<;latlve ServICes Depdrtment, Cynthia E Goudeau, CMC, CIty Clerk
Cynd] Tarapalll
Planmng Department
Cynthld E Goudeau, CMC
Ctty Clerk
CIty of Clearwater PO 8m.. 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748
NOTE Apphcant or representatIVe must be present at the heanng
YOU ARE 8EING SENT nlls NOTICE IF YOU ARE THE APPLICANT OR OWN PROPERTY WITHIN 200 FT OF
THE SUBJECT PROPERTY
A COpy OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABI...E IN THE OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE
SERVICES DEPT ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN
ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL THE OFFICIAL RECORDS AND
LEGISLATIVE SERVICES DEPT WITH THEIR REQUEST Af (727) 562~4090
Ad 10/31/04
,.
."
liS N,. lc.a.,t~
VJVV
CITY OF CLEARWATER
NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS
The Commumty Development Board of the CIty of Clearwater, F]onda, will hold public hearlllg~ on Tue!>da)', Octoher
19, 2004, beglllnlng at 2 00 pm, m the CI ty Councl] Chamber~, In CIty Hall, 3 rd fl oor, ]] 2 South Osceola A venue,
Cledrwater, Honda, to consider the followmg requests:
NOTE. All persons wishIDl! to address an Item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meetml! Those cases
that arc not contested by the applicant, staff. nell!hborml! property owners, etc will be placed on a consent al!enda
and approved by a ~ml!le vote at the bel!mnme: of the meetme:
I K & P Clearwater Estate. LLC the CIty I" requestmg for the only purpose of dttilchmg conditIOns of approvd], of(])
F]exlble Development approval to Termmate the Statu~ ofa Nonconformity for denSity wIthm the Toun"t Dlstnct, under the
proVI slOns of SectIOn 6-1 09 C, (2) F] eXI ble Development approval to penmt 350 overnight accommodatIOn Unt ts and 75
attached dwellmgs as a mixed use (With mcrease In denSity of 250 hotel room" from the Beach by DeSign denSIty pool),
With a reductIOn to the front (east along Coronado Dnve) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to butldmg), a reductIOn to the
front (~outh along proposed Second Street) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to bUlldmg), a reduehon to the front (we~t and
north along South Gulf view Boulevard) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to bUIlding), an mcrease to the bUl]dmg height
from 35 feet to 150 feet (to roof deck) With an addIttonal five feet tor penmeter pilrapet" (from roof deck) and an addIttonal
33 feet for elevator, staIr, mechamcal rooms/architectural embellishments (from roof deck), devlatlOns to allow stacked
pdTkmg, allow access to a major artenal street and allow a bUlldmg Within the reqUIred SIght VISibility tnangles at the
mtersectlOn of Coronado Dnve and proposed Second Street, as a ComprehenSive lnfill Redevelopment ProJect, under the
prOVISIOns of Sectton 2-803 C, and to ehmmate the required foundatIOn landscapmg along Coronado Dnve and proposed
Second Street, as a ComprehenSive Landscape Program, under the proVISIOn" of SectIOn 3-1202 G, and (3) the vacahon of a
portIOn thc nght-of-way for Gu]fvlew Boulevard between Coronado Dove and proposed Second Street, the vacatIOn of the
Fast Street nght-of-way between Coronado Dnve and Gu]fvlew Boulevard, the dedicatIOn of nght-of-way for proposed
Second Street between Coronado Avenue and Gulf view Boulevard and the dedicatIOn of nght-of-way for Coronado Dnve
between proposed Second Street and Gulf view Bou]evard [Proposed Use: Hotel of350 room" (127 78 rooms/acre on total
Site), 75 attached dwelhngs (2738 uruts/acre on total &Ite) and a maximum of 37,000 sq ft (031 FAR on total SIte) of
amemtles accessory to the hotel, at a height of 150 ft (to roof deck) With an additIOnal 5 ft for penmeter parapets (from roof
deck) dnd an additional 33 ft for elevator, "taIT, mechallleal room,,/arcrutectural embelhshment& (from roof deck)] at 100
Coronado Dr. & 201. 215 and 219 South Gulf view Blvd, L1oyd-Whlte-Skmner Sub, Lots 44-55,90-100, 102, part of Lot
56 & 101, and Columbia Sub, B]k A, Lot 1 FLD2004-02013
2 (cont from 9/21/2004) Vire:mIa B Franks (Radchffe Development Company, LLC) IS requesttng a fleXible
Development approval to develop 4 re"ldenttal attdehed dwelhng umts on a 6,479 sq ft lot (10,000 sq ft IS reqUIred), With a
mllllmum lot Width of 60 ft (100 ft 1S reqUIred), a reductIOn III the front setback from 15 ft to 569 ft to pavement, a
reductIOn m the SIde (south) setback from lOft to 4 ft (to extenor &talTS) a reductiOn of the side (north) setback from] 0 ft to
672ft (to bUlldmg), a reductiOn of the rear setback from 20 ft to lOft to wooden deck, and a bUlldmg heIght mcrea"e from
35 ft to 51 83 ft from FEMA to roof midpOint under the proVISIOns of SectIOn 2-803 B (Proposed Use Attached
dwellmgs) at 669 Bav Esplanade, Mandalay Umt No 5 Replat, Blk 77, Lot 8 PI D2004-03018
., (cont from 9/21/2004) Bnl!htwater Point. LLC IS reque"tmg a FleXIble Development to penmt a multi-use dock, under
the prOVISIOns of SectiOn 3-60 I (Proposed Use: Construct 2 mulh-use docks of 2,478 sq ft for 14 shps) at 205. 209 and
214 Bril!htwater Dr., Bayslde Sub No 2, Lot" 27,28 & 29 FLD2004-06046
4 (cant from 9/21/2004) 1504 Carden Tne IS requc"tmg a FleXible Development approval to penmt retaIl ~a]es wlthm an
eXhtlng two-story commercial bUl]dmg WIth a reductIOn to lot ,}fea from 10,000 sq ft to 7,720 sq ft, a reductIOn to lot Width
(west) from 100 ft to 50 8] ft, reductIOns to the front (north) "etback from 25 ft to 19 ft (to eXl&tlng and proposed bUlldmg)
dnd from 25 ft to ]4 ft (to proposed pavement), a reductIOn to the front (west) ~etbilck from 25 ft to 15 ft (to propo~ed
pdvcment), reductIons to the Side (south) setback from 10 ft to I ft (to eXI"ting and propo"ed bUlldmg) and from 10 ft to
zero ft (to proposed pavement) and a reductIOn to reqUIred parkmg from 5 to 4 5 spaces per 1,000 sq ft, as a ComprehenSive
]ntill Redevelopment Project, under the proVISIOns of SectIOn 2-704 C, and d rcductlOn to thc landscape buffer along the
south property Ime from 5 ft to z(,ro ft and a reductlOn m the Width of the reqUIred foundatIOn land"capmg adjacent to the
bUlldlllg (west ~lde) from 5 ft to 3 75 ft, as part of d Comprehen~lve Landscape Program, under the provl"lOns of SectIOn 3-
] 202 G (Proposed Use. RetaIl sale" and seTVIces) ilt 503 Marshall St , E A Marshall's Sub, Lot 10 & W Yo of VdC alley on
E FLD2004-02010
5 (cont from 9/2112004) Ouahtv Boats I nc & Cli'arwater Manne AquarIUm. I DC. (Harbour Wate-h, LLC) are
requestmg a Flexible Development approval to permit 31 attached re~ldLntlal UIllt~ with a front (north) setback of 66ft (to
pavement) and 26 12 ft (to bwldmg), a <;lde (ea~t) setback of 22 75 ft (to bulldmg), a rear (south) setback of 20 ft (to pool
and cabana) and 53 56 ft to bUlldmg, .md a sid" (west) ~etback of zero ft (to pavement) and 22 74 ft (to bUlldmg), and a
blllldmg height of 85 ft from Base Flood ElevatlOn to mldpomt of the roof, as part of a Comprehensive Inti]]
Redeve]opment ProJeLt, under the provIsIOns of SectlOns 2-704 C (Proposed U'Ie Multt-famtly resldenttal) at 279
Windward Passage, Island Estates of Clearwater Umt 5, Blk C, W 50' of Lots 1 and 4 and all of Lots 5, 6, 7 and 8
FI..D2004-06042
6 Wmdward Passae:e CondommlUms. LLC / Hu!h and Dry Manna. Ine IS requestlOg a fleXible Development to
pennlt a multi-use dock with a reductIOn to the side (east) setback from 429ft to ] 87ft, under the provlslOns ofSechon 3-
60] [Proposed Use. ConstructIOn of a mulh-use dock for 20 shps tota]mg 4720 ~q ft, with each dock measunng 50 ft m
length from a ]0 ft wide boardwalk adjacent to the seawall (m assoCJatlon with an approved 55 umt condomlOlUm project)]
at 202 Wmdward Passaee, Is]and Estates of Clearwater Umt 5, Blk 0, part of Lot 9 and all of Lots 10-13 lOci FLD2004-
05035
7 The Moorme:s Town Homes II. LLC IS requestmg a Flexlb]e Deve]opment to penrut a mu]tl-use dock, under the
provIsIOns of SectIOn 3-60] [Proposed Use: ConstructIOn of a 740 "q ft multi-use dock for 6 sltps, With each dock
measurmg 40 ft m length from the seawall (m assoclatton With an approved 6 umt townhome project)] at 674 Bavwav
Boulevard, Moonngs Townhomes II, Lots 1-6 FLD2004-07049
8 Brll:!htwater Cove LLC IS requesttng a FleXible Development dpproval to pemut a multi-use dock for 9 slips With a
reductIOn to the Side (east) setback from 17 9 ft to 7 ft, a reductIOn to the Side (west) setback from 17 9 ft to 9 ft and an
Increase to the Width of the dock from 75 percent of the lot Width (134 ft) to 90 5 percent ofthe lot Width (162 ft), under the
provl SlOns of SectIOn 3-60 I [Proposed Use. Construction of a 1700 sq ft mu]tl-use dock for 9 sit P'" With each dock
measunng a maxImum of 589ft m length from the ~eawall (m assoclatlOn With an approved 9 UOlt townhome project)] at
130 Brlehtwater Drive, Bnghtwater Cove, Lots 1-9 FLD2004-07051
9Davld A. & Sharon A. Cote are reque~tmg a fleXible Development approval for (1) the TermmatlOn of Status of
Nonconformity for denSity for the purpose of addmg a 3 car garage, under the prov1slOns of SectIOn 6-109, and (2) the
expansion of attached dwellmgs With a reductIOn to the front (north) setback from 25 ft to 20 ft (to bUlldmg) and a reductIOn
to the Side (south) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to bUlldmg), as a ReSidential ]nfill Project, under the provlslOns of Section 2-
203 C [Proposed Use ConstructIOn of a 3 car attached garage 111 associatIOn With an eXlstmg nonconfomung attached
dwellmg (duplex)] at 115 North Kevstone Drive, Keystone Manor, Blk 0, Lot 1 & 20 FLD2004-06044
] 0 John S. Taylor. In /Interstate Hotels and Resorts (ContlOental DeSign & Supphes, LLC) are requestmg a FleXible
Development approval to permit a reductlOn to the number of parkmg spaces from 445 to 324 spdce<; at an eXIsting
overnight accommodatlOn and retal] sales use (l-hlton Hotel), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the
proVISIOns of SectlOn 2-803 C [Proposed Use' EhmmatlOn of 35 eXlstmg parkmg spaces m conjunctIOn With lmprovemt,nts
to an eXlstmg hotel (HIlton)] at 400 Mandalav A venue, Sec 08-29-15, M&B 23 0 I FLD2004-04027
1 I City of Clearwater are requesting a Flexlb]e Development appltcatlOn to amend a preVIOusly approved FLD2002-
0702] A (COB approved on Apnl 15, 2003) to ehmmate landscape Is]ands and separators 111 the parkmg area south of the
stadIUm and to add additIOnal land area wlthm the Progress Energy nght-of-way ~ollth of the stadtum for grdss parkmg,
under the proVISIOn" ofSectlOns 2-704 Band 2-1404 A and to amend a prevlous]y approved Compreh<.,n<;lve Slgn Program
(SGN2003-0 1 002) for the stadIUm, under the proVISIOns of SectIOn 3-1807 (Proposed Use: AddttlOn of grass parkmg area
wlthm Progress Energy nght-of-way adjacent to and southwe&t of the Bnght Hou::,e Nehvorks stadIUm, ehmmatlOn of
landscape Islands and separators from paved parkmg area south of the stadlllm and dmendment to the approved slgnage) at
601 Old Coachman Road, Sec 07-29-16, M&B 410] & 430] & Clearwater CollectlQn 2nd Replat FLD2004-
07055/SGN2004-08001
12 C]earw,lter Seashell Resort. L.C 1S requestmg a FleXible Devdopment dpphcatlOn to amend a prevlOusly approved
F L 01-01-0 1 (COB dpproved on February 20, 200]) to perml t an addl tlOnal 24 overnight accommodatIOn um ts from the
denSity pool (m addltlon to the prevlOllsly approved 250 overnIght accommodatIOn Ulllt')) as a mixed use, With a maximum
of 70,000 sq ft of dmemtJes accessory to the hotel and a mlOllTIUm of 400 pubhc pdrkmg spaces, as a ComprehenSive InfiJl
Redeve]opment Project, under the proVISIOns of Section 2-803 C [Proposed Use. Hotel of 250 rooms (153 37 rooms/acre
on total SIte), ]8 attached dwelhngs (1104 ul11ts/acre on total sIte) and a maXlITlUm of 70,000 sq ft (0 98 FAR on total sIte)
of amellltles acce:.sory to the hotel, at a height of 150 ft (to roof deck)] at 229 and 301 South GlIlhlCW Boulevard and
'j
230.300 and 304 Coronado Dnve (Related to DV A2004-00002) lloyd-White Skmner Sub, Lot~ 57, 58, 59, 104, 105 &
106 dnd part of Lots 56 103, & 107 FLD2004-07052
13 Bavwatch SUJtes Inc. I Valentlllo~ Koumouhdls IS requestmg a Flexible Development apphcatlon to penmt dttachcd
dwelhngs with reductIOns to the front ~etback from 15 ft to zero ft (to pavement and trash stagmg area), a reductIon to the
side (Cd~t) setback from 10 [t to three ft (to pavement), reductlOn" to the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 7 I ft (to
pavement) and 73ft to bUlldmg, reductIOn,> of the redr setback from 20 ft to zero ft (to pool deck) and from 20 ft to 97ft
(to bulldmg), as a Comprehensive 1nfill Redevelopment ProJect, under the provIsIOns of SectIOn 2-803 C and the Transfer
of Development Rights for 3 dwelhng Units from 620 BaywJ.Y Boulevdrd (1 Unit), 674 Bayway Boulevard (I umt), and 645
Bayway Boulevard (l umt) [Proposed Use Attached dwe]hng umts (19 Unit condomllllUm, 4 leve]~ of livmg area over
ground-level parkmg)] J.t 600 Bavwav Bou]evard, Bayslde Sub No 5, Lots 6-8 & npanan nghts FLD2004-
07050/TD R2004-090 12
]4 Elh~ & Co.. Ltd a Flonda LImited Patner&hlp IS requestmg a flexible Deve]opment approval for the change of u"e of
an ex u,tmg automobile ~ervlee statton to a 2,266 sq ft re&taurant, with a reductIOn to the front (west) setbdck from 25 ft to ] 5
ft (to pavement), a reductIOn of the front (north) setback from 25 ft to 15 ft (to pavement), reducttons of the sIde (west)
setback from 10 ft to 3 ft (to bUlldmg) and 10 ft to zero ft (to cxtenor &eatmg wood deck), a reductIOn of the sIde (south)
~ctback from 10 ft to zero ft (to pavement), as d ComprehenSIve InfiII Redevelopment Project, under the prOVISlOn& of
SectIOn 2-704 C, and as part of a ComprehenSive Landscape Program, under the prOVISIOns of SectIOn 3-] 202 G
(Proposed Use: Restdurant) at 2201 Gulf to Bav Boulevard, See 18-29-16, M&B 32/04 and 32/05 FLD2004-08058
15 Cltv of Clearwater IS requestmg a FleXible Development approval for mstd]]atlOn of a seeunty fence at an eXlstmg
potable water faCIlity The request mcludes placement of an 8 ft fence conslstmg of ma&orny columns wIth substantIal
alummum gnllwork wlthm a front (north) setback and exemptIOn from the landscaping reqUirements along the proposed
Chdtn hnk fencmg proposed for the eastern and southern property boundanes, a& a ComprehenSive Infi]] Redevelopment
ProJect, per sectIOn 2-1204 A (Proposed Use. Secunty Fence) at 2775 State Road 580. See 29-28-16, M&B 31/01
FLD2004-09064
16 Ronald J. & Miredle Pollack are requc,>tmg a FleXIble Development for an addition to an eXIstmg smgle-fanuly
reSIdence The request IS for reductIOn to the Coastal Con<;tructlOn Control Lme (west) setback from 25 ft to 8 ft to the
structure, as part of a Resldentla] Infill ProJcct under the prOVISIOns of SectIOn 2-203 C (Proposed Use Detached
Dwellmg) at 1000 Eldorado Avenue, MandJ.]ay, Blk 69, Lot 6 & part of Lot 5 & npanan nghts FLD2004-08056
17 Manal 011. Ine IS requestmg an Appeal of an adnurustratlve detemunatlOD denymg the expansIOn ofthc retail sales portIOn
(convcmcnce ~tore) of a nonconformmg automoblle &ervlee statIOn, under the provlSlons of SectIOns 4-501 A 2 and 4-503
(Proposed Use. Expan:>lOn of an automobl]e service st.atlOn) dt 1310 Cleveland Street, Brookwood Terrace ReVised, B]k 2,
Lots 30-33 APP2004-00006 "
lntere~ted parties may appear dnd be heard at the hednngs or file wntten notice of approval or objectIOn with the Planmng
Director or City Clerk pnor to the heanngs Any person who deCides to appeal any decI'>lOn made by the Board, with
ref>pcct to any matter conSIdered at ~uch heanngs, will need to request and obtam party status by the Board dunng the Cdse
dISCUSSIOn, a record of the proceedmgs and, for such purpose, may need to cn,>ure that a verbatIm record of the proceedmgs
IS made, whICh record mcludes the testimony and eVidence upon which the dppeal IS to be based pcr Flonda Statute
2860105 Commuruty Development Code SectIOn 4-206 state& that party status shall be granted by the Board If per,;on
rcquestlng "uch demonstrate~ that s/he IS substantially affected Pdrty status entItles partJe~ to personally testify, present
eVidence, argument and wltnesse~, cross-eXdmme wltne,>"es, appeal the deCISion and speak on reconslderatlOn requc~t~
An oath Will be Jdmlmstereu swearmg all partlclpants m pubhc heanng Cd&es If you wI~h to speak please walt to be
recognized, then state and spell your name and proVide your addre:>& Persons speakmg before the CDB shall be limIted to
tluec mmute& unless an mdlvldllalls representmg d group In which case the Chalrpcr~on may duthonze a reasonable amount
of tIme up to 10 mmutes
Five days pnor to the meetlllg, ~taff reports and reco0U11endatlons on the above request~ Will be dvallable for review by
mterc~ted partie,> between the hours of 8 30 am dnd 4 30 pm, weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Pldnlllng Department,
100 S Myrtle Ave, Clearwater, FL 33756 Please contact Frank Gerlock, Development ReVIew Manager, dt 562-4557 to
dl,>eus~ any questIOns or <-oncerns J.bout the proJcct and/or to better understand the proposal and revIew the sIte plan
I hiS notIce was sent by the OffiCial Records and LegislatIve Servlce<; Depdrtment, Cynthld E Goudeau, CMC, City Clerk
'j
Cyndl Tdrapam
Planmng Department
Cynthia E Goudeau, CMC
City Clerk
City of Clearwater POBox 4748, Clearwater FL 33758-4748
NOTE Applicant or representative must be pre~ent at the heanng
YOU ARE BEING SENT THIS NOTICE IF YOU ARE THE APPLICANT OR OWN PROPERTY WITHIN 200 FT OF
THE SUBJECT PROPERTY
A COpy OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS A V AILABLE IN THE OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE
SERVICES DEPT ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN
ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL THE OFFICIAL RECORDS AND
LEGlSLATIVE SERVICES DEPT WITH THEIR REOUEST AT (727) 562-4090.
Ad 10/03/04
u)w
FLD ~OOi/- ()~~Y.t.f
/ IS" t1,/, I(cY~TI;NG /JIG
~ cl
ROSENDE, MITCHELL A
1654 LAURA ST
CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6134
HA YWOOD, MARION G
1621 GROVE ST
CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6117
HASSELL, VERNON
HASSELL, SUZAN
1679 DREW ST
CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6109
HASSELL, MERWYN L TRE
HASSELL, MERILYN I TRE
2 DORADO PL
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 4861
WELLBROCK, DIRK
1628 DREW ST
CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6108
LONG LAND, TIMOTHY
WYNS-LONGLAND, MIRIAM E
1664 CLEVELAND ST
CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6103
COTE, DAVID A
COTE, SHARON A
115 N KEYSTONE DR
CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6123
WHEATON, CLARENCE L
WHEATON, TONI R
1656 CLEVELAND ST
CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6103
DANDANEAU, JAYNE L
1629 FLAGLER DR
CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 2818
ELLINGHAM, ANNE E
1720 CYPRESS TRACE DR
SAFETY HARBOR FL 34695 -
4500
BONO, ROBERT J
BONO, DONALD D
110 N DUNCAN AVE
DUNEDIN FL 33755 - 6113
BRANNEN, JOEL T
1634 DREW ST
CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6108
SAFIRSTEIN, G RICHARD
SAFIRSTEIN, SHELLEY
1678 CLEVELAND ST
CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6103
ARGENTINI-RHODES, LISA M
1656 GROVE ST
CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6118
MC CARTHY, JAMES B
1652 GROVE ST
CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6118
SCHLINDWEIN, SCOTT J
SCHLINDWEIN, DEBORAH M
1630 LAURA ST
CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6131
DUNN, RUTH
2175 N LEE LN
ASTON PA 19014 - 2286
NEWMAN, CHARLES H
NEWMAN, VIRGINIA M
1661 LAURA ST
CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6135
KELLEHER, DELL V
1675 GROVE ST
CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6119
RODRIQUEZ, HILARIO
1628 CLEVELAND ST
CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6101
NASTA, PAULINE
]543 S HIGHLAND AVE # 210
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2392
CHIPELLO, ROSA M
1632 CLEVELAND ST
CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6101
CURRENT OWNER
1661 DREW ST
CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6109
WILSON, ROBERTA
1613 GROVE ST
CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6117
HUGAR, DANIEL J
1665 GROVE ST
CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6] 19
PLYLER, GARY D
1550 CLEVELAND ST
CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6003
KLINGER, THOMAS V
1645 DREW ST
CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6] 09
MEADE, JOSEPH E
MEADE, BRENDA J
1631 GROVE ST
CLEARWATERFL33755 -6117
TSACRJOS, JAMES
TSACRIOS, ALICE L
1644 CLEVELAND ST
CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6103
JANNELLl, GILBERT G
1925 HARDING ST
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2430
KNIGHT, TIMOTHY H TYRKA, MARTIN R PEARMAN, RALPH W
KNIGHT, PATRICK B 1676 PALMWOOD DR PEARMAN, VIRGINIA
2148 COLLEGE DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3679 1650 LAURA ST
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 4818 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6134
PONTICELLI, JAMES T STRICKLAND, KENNETH C RUJZ, HECTOR
1626 CLEVELAND ST STRICKLAND, CAROL A RUIZ, KAREN
CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6101 1634 LAURA 8T liON KEYSTONE DR
CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6131 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6122
PEASE, ROLAND A O'LEARY, SHANNON SHINE, MARK
PEASE, THELMA L 1612 LAURA ST NOWAK, MONIQUE
1650 CLEVELAND ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6131 1645 LAURA ST
CLEARW ATER FL 33755 - 6103 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6135
DASO, ROBERT S ENGINEER, NOSHIR C POPEKO, JOHN G
DASO, LULA G 21 LOVEKIN GROVE 1621 DREW ST
5 N KEYSTONE DR SCARBOROUGH ON M 1 T 3T5 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6106
CLEARW A TER FL 33755 - 6121 00030 -
CANADA
SMITTEN, JOHN A WRlGHT, JERRY M PARROTT, JACK
1650 DREW ST 1639 DREW ST PARROTT, MICHELLE
CLEARW ATER FL 33755 - 6110 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6106 1618 GROVE ST
CLEARWATER fL 33755 - 6116
GRIVAS, ATHANASIOS E COTE, DAVID REINHARDT, RONALD H
27 ESTUARY TRL COTE, SHARON A W 16931 ELDRIDGE AVE
CLEARWATER Fi 33759 - 4466 111 N KEYSTONE DR SPRING HILL FL 34610 - 7364
CLEARW A TER FL 33755 - 6123
TUNCEREN, LILLIEN L BOGACKI, JOZEF LAUSTER, DONALD A
TUNCEREN,I VURAL PO BOX 1077 1665 LAURA ST
1615 LAURA ST CLEARWATER FL 33757 - 1077 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6135
CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6]33
KNIGHT, DONALD R KNIGHT, DONALD REINHARDT, DAVID H
KNIGHT, DOTTIE F KNIGHT, DOTTIE 2177 ALAMANDA DR
1648 GROVE ST 1648 GROVE ST CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 3708
CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6118 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6118
PLYLER, GARY D ZUBEK, MARK A OSBORNE, JACK
PLYLER, BONNIE A ZUBEK, LINDA J 1631 DREW ST
1550 CLEVELAND ST 13986 BONNIE BRAE DR CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6106
CLEAR WATER FL 33755 - 6003 LARGO FL 33774 - 4505
SAPORITO, RHOE M ANNEN, TIMOTHY M BRADFORD, FRANCES V
1670 LAURA ST PO BOX 1822 1660 CLEVELAND ST
CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6134 OLDSMAR FL 34677 - 1822 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6103
WHITE, JACK FLIT
WHITE, S NOEL
105 N KEYSTONE DR
CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6123
MC A TEER, LYNDA M
1662 LAURA ST
CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6134
PETTINATO, PAM
104 N KEYSTONE DR
CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6122
BRYAN, KEITH
1668 CLEVELAND ST
CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6]03
YARBROUGH, RUJEERA T
1626 GROVE ST
CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6116
CROCE, JOSEPH A
1646 GROVE ST
CLEARWATERFL 33755 - 6118
KRAMER, MANFRED
4545 12TH AVE N
ST PETERSBURG FL 33713 - 5221
CHRISMAN, JANICE C
108 N KEYSTONE DR
CLEARWATERFL33755 - 6122
HASSELL, VERNON
HASSELL, SUSAN
1679 DREW ST
CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6109
BLAKELEY, CHRIS TRE
1635 DREW LAND TRUST
1616 GULF TO BAY BLVD STB
E
CLEARW A TER FL 33755 - 6479
HIGGINS, RANDY C
1615 DREW 8T
CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6106
MARLOWE, MARTY B
1655 LAURA ST
CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6135
MILES, RONALD W
1619 GROVE ST
CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6117
BRUEN, BEVERLY
1611 GROVE ST
CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6117
EWING, ROBERT L
EWING, ISABEL K
540 S TRAPPE RD
PHOENIXVILLE PA 19460 - 1028
FOSTER, NOEMI C
FOSTER, GARY
200 RICHARDS AVE
CLEARW A TER FL 33755 - 5825
BABER, RICHARD B
1621 LAURA ST
CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6133
BURNS, RONALD H IT
BURNS, WENDY V
208 RICHARDS A VB
CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 5825
KNIGHT, TIMOTHY H
KNIGHT, PATRICK B
2148 COLLEGE DR
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 4818
CAMPI, DOROTHY S
1641 DREW ST
CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6109
SPINOZA, MELVIN
6099 PATRICIA PL
SPRING HILL FL 34607 - 2035
SKINNER, RYAN J
SKINNER, STACEY J
1620 LAURA ST
CLEARWATERFL33755 - 6131
CRAMER, MARY
MUTH, SANDRA
1631 LAURA ST
CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6133
MOSLEY, STEPHEN M
1620 CLEVELAND 8T
CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6101
T L D INVESTMENT CORP
PO BOX 6532
CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 6532
KNICKERBOCKER, CHESTER E
122 OAK ST
CO LLEGEVILLE P A 19426 - 1824
OUT ILL, SUSAN J T
264 WHISPER LAKE RD
PALM HARBOR FL 34683 - 5539
KNOWLES, ELLEN V
1635 LAURA ST
CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6133
CURRENT OWNER
1671 GROVE 5T
CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6119
RILEY, LOUISE C TR
1620 DREW ST
CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6108
"
LOHMANN, MATTHEW S
LOHMANN, CHRISTINA
9226 AMAZON DR
NEW PORT RICHEY FL 34655 -
1604
DEANE, ROY M
DEANE, DEBORAH A
] 625 1/2 LAURA ST
CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6133
WASSON, DEBBIE A
ION KEYSTONE DR
CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6120
Keystone Manor
Ken Stnckland
1634 Laura St
Clearwater, FL 33755
ENZOR, NORMAN L TRE
4011 KIMPTON PL
LARGO FL 33771 - 3313
LEO, MARY
16]6 LAURA ST
CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6131
HARTMAN, ELAINEH
HA YNIE, MARIE H
1614 CLEVELAND ST
CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6101
Clearwater Neighborhoods CoalItIOn
Doug WIllIams, Presldent
2544 Fnsco Dr
Clearwater, FL 33761
MILLER, MATTHEW J
MILLER, CAROLYN C
1655 DREW ST
CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6109
CHASE MANHA TT AN MTG
CORP
3415 VISION DR
COLUMBUS OH 43219-
KNIGHT, DONALD R
KNIGHT, DOTTIE F
1648 GROVE ST
CLEARWATER fL 33755 - 6118
~
FROM Home Rentals & Realt~.In(
/
FRX NO 7275966958
Jov 12 2004 10:44RM P1
November 11,2004
VIa Facslmile-562-4865
To: City of Clearwater Planning Department
Community Developm.ent Board
100 S. Myrtle Ave.
Clearwater, FL 33758
Re. 115 N. Keystone Dr.
Laundry room viSible from street
Dear Board Members.
I, Mark lubek own the property dIrectly next door to the one requestIng supposed
unprovements. I ask that you deny this request.
Altowmg tlus use will cause un-necessary traffic and commot1on in the area
detrimental to property values.
It seemS that people will either be walking down a sidewalk at the edge of the
nght..of-way or backing into the driveway and unloading baskets of laoodry, storing theic
dlrty clothes and supplies In a "breezeway" ) perhaps giving the appearance of a
Laundromat.
Wayne Wells says "sure they could put a com operated wm:her dryer in there:' Is
th~e reqUIrements regardmg the time that people can do laundry in the City of
Clearwater or who can use the machmes? No. I have a bedroom next to the adcbtIon do
not want to be kept up all night With the SOWld of a washer/dryer. . vlftua11y outside (10 a
breezeway).
I ask the members of the Community Development Board to walk down the
streets In their neighborhood. Do you see a laundry room? Do you see people walking
down the street with lsl.Uldry baskets?
I ask Wayne Wells to pomt out areas in the city where this type of actiVity occurs?
I have been a lIcensed Real Estate agent m the state of Florida since 1991 I have
managed properties from Tlerra Verda to Tarpon Spnngs and own several propertles as
well. 1 have only witnessed Laundry connections visible from the street or outdoors m
only the most tmdesrrable locatiOns.
ThIs property (small duplex) was built for a reason. It is located 1 block from the
bus-hne and there are plenty of laWldry and storage facUities nearby on Drew Street
Those reasons still apply today. Although the highest and best use of that property would
be conversion to single family house with an appropnate sized garage
Thank you for your attention In this matter.
Mark: Zubek
-<;
FROM 'Home Rentals & REalt~,Ir
FRX NO 7275966958
JV 12 2004 01 24PM P1
November 12,2004
City of Clearwater Plannmg Department
Attention Wayne Wells, et al ..... - 1> Jett-s.tZ.- d \ S .b~ ..... s c.. h)
100 S Myrtle Ave N.t....,.ber~ f~'ot" +0
Clearwater, FL 33758
C DMfv\ IA t-J { \" y'
1> R.tlf..l ~ f0~.P\.. f- i oct v-d.
III lfo /0'-1 Mlt. -4l h"'5 .
Re: Case # FLD2004..()6044 Proposed developmentlterminatlon of non-conformmg
status 115 Keystone Dr '
Dear Board members,
I have been struggling with the words to explain my concerns regardmg Case FLD2004-
06044 I will start by pomtmg out to you that David and Sharon Cote are
simuhaneously applying to you for TWO uniqueJy different thmgs:
(1) a tennination of non-confonntng status AND
(2) the expansion of attached dwelling with a reducnpn to setbacks
The second of WhICh IS contingent upon the flf5t. I feellt IS IMPERATIVE that we
address ONE issue at 0. time so we don't "put the cart before the horse".
ThIS letter will address the fIrst issue, the request for tennination of non-conforming
status. This comes first, because the Cotes must become a conforming or "as practical as
possible to a confonning status. .. (per Clearwater Community Development Code,
SectiOn 6-101, see below) in order to be granted termination of non-conformmg status. I
do NOT see that flus issue has been addressed. How arc thc Cotes bnnging then
non--confonnmg duplex into confonnity with this neighborhood whIch is zoned SINGLE
F AMIL Y RESIDENTIAL? They are NOT They are not even attempting to bnng it
into confonmty. What they are asking us to do IS 'Ghel it as coriforming, but allow It to
contmue to eXlst and then to be expanded ilnd continue to allow It to be used (1$ 0 Ron-
confm7n;ng duplex. THIS IS IN DIRECT JIlOLA TlON TO THE CODES/
Let us ask WHY this duplex is labeled non-confonmng. Because it is in a single famtly
reSidentIal neighborhood. When the neighborhood was zoned reSidential, the city made a
conSCientiOUS effort to label all non-conforming properties so that they WOULD NOT
BE ALLOWED TO BE EXPANDED UPON' They were In effect saying, ~'Hey you
don't fit in, but we'Iller yt"'lU stay until you're no longer useful and then you Will be
required to CONFORM in order to EXPAND" When the Cotes request these types of
improvements, they are asking to expand thIs non-confonning Duplex, when clearly the
code was created to PROHIBIT this
PAGE 1 OF 3
FROM Home Rentals & Realt~.In(
FAX NO :7275966958
lov 12 2004 01: 24PM P2
Directly from the Clearwater Community Development Code:
Section 6..] 01. Pu rposelappUeability.
The purpose of this division is to regulate and limit the development and
continued extstence of uses~ structures and lots which were lawful on the date of the
adoption of this Code, but which would be prohibited, regulated, or
restricted under the terms established herein. While nonconfonmties may
contInue, it is the intent of tbis developlDent code to bring nonconforming
properties into complian~e with the provisions of tbis code in
conjunction with a ebange of use, redevelopmeD~ or any other change
of condition of the pJ"operty in order to eliminate the nonconformity or
to brine the nonconformity 8S practical as pOssible to a conforminj
status.
(Ord No. 6573-00, ~ 7,8-3..00)
Section 6-103. Nonconforming uses.
A. NOl1confonning uses of land or structures, and nonconfonning stnlctures that
contain nonconfonning uses, may be maintainec;l Db: in accordance with the
provisions of this section.
B, Nonconforming uses of land or structures shall not be expanded but normal
repair and maintenance may be performed to allow the continuation of the
nonconforming USe.
..C. E:tcept as provided in 6-109, a nonconforming USe shall not be
changed to any other use UNLESS THE NEW USE CONFORMS to tbe
standards of the zoning district in which it is located. Once a
nonconforming use is cbanged to a conforming use, the
nonconforming use SHALL NOT BE RE-
ESTABLISHED. **
The Cotes are asking you to tenninate their nonconformmg status, yet allow It to continue
It's non--confonning use-but the code says "the nonconfonning use SHALL NOT BE
RE~ESTABLJSHEDI"
PAGE 2 OF 3
FROM :Home Rentals & Realt~, In(
FRX NO :7275966958
lov 12 2004 01 25PM P3
ALSO'
Section 6-102. Nonconforming struetures.
D. A nonconforming structure may be expanded:
1. If it is nonconforming SOLELY because orits failure to comply
with the off..street parking requiremenu of this de\Telopment code and
the enlargement will not increase the required amount of parking by
more than three additional spaces; or
2. If the expansion, Whl"D rom::id"rt>tf h, i-so,,.tion fron1 the e:dding
structure, is in compliance with all requirements of this development
code.
ALSO
In the PlannIng Department's own Staff Repo~ on the chart of COMPLIANCE WITH
STANDARDS AND CRITERIA (page 4 of 6, attached), tbree of the five critena are
INCONSISTENT with the required standards and cntena'
I hope you all can understand. Think about your own homes. If SOmeone wanted to put a
duplex next to you and then make it bigger~ would YOU allow It? We all know that
multi..family duplexes and triplexes are NOT allowed In single family residential
neighborhoods because they are NOT DESIRABLE The non~confomung status of thIS
property was created to PROTECT the neighborhood from It'S expansion
PLEASE deny the Cotes request and let us enjoy our quiet, RESIDENTIAL
neIghborhood.
Respee~
~ubek
Owner
165] Grove St. (right next door to the proposed addition)
Clearwater, FLE
PAGE 3 OF 3
FROM Home Renta Is & Rea I t~, I I
FAX NO 7275955958
J 12 2004 01 25PM P4
COMPLIANCE WITH STANDA.RDS AND CRITERIA: (SectloDS 2-401.1 and 2-404):
STANDARD PROPOSED CONSISTENT INCONSISTENlf'
MAXIMUM Two dwelling umts (existIng; x+ -
DENSITY (7.5 noncotl fanning)
d ""elling units "
per ,
acre) (one dwelling
unit maximum) I \
IMPERVIOUS 0.42 X . ,
SURFACE RATIO "
(ISR) (0.65 maximum) .
LOT AREA (10,000 7,038 square feet.. X*
sq. feet minimum for
attached dwelllnl!s1 "
LOT WIDTH (100 North 137 5 feet X'" ,
feet minhnum for West: 51 feet.... "
attached dwelJinl!s)
PARKING SPACES TI-uee spaces (in garage); three spaces X ,
(1.5 spaces per unit- r I ~',
In drIveways "...
."
attached dweIlingsj .),
~
three SPlIces required) -
· See AnalysIs for drscussion
** Nonconfonnmg
,~
~
"
"
,fl,'
~l,~
,';
~
. it:
~~-, . ~I
...'\ ~ r
,
, '
'" , I, c'
e f .'
~,
,c
'"1
'! '" "
, ...
..
~~"
". ~ , I
l..l
,~........ .-
,~
.,..
,
,
. - &:,'
.i
It'
~.
~i
1~1~\
\,
'.
"-"
"-i"'
~_...L ~::.
it:
~lt.:~...
"
.,
:.Ii
~,
~,
,
,.
..
...
Staff Report - COmtn\.lffity Dtlvelopment Board - October 19. 2004 . Case F1..D2004-OG044 '~,
Page40f6 '" ~"J;,'
/t.11JCH Mt/IIf i:D tl.~l/rJ( L;/lti- /dff/ r-e..; : .t
n tr II,tv 2..(bet::. rMEt 17J)7JJOt),/)/~(Jij
FROM Home Rentals & Realt~,Inc
FAX NO '7275955958
jov 12 2004 12: 12PM Pi
November 13,2004
Via Facsimile- 562~4865
Clearwater Planning Department
Clearwater Development Board
100 S Myrtle Ave
Clearwater, FL 33756
RE' 115 N. Keystone Dr.
Dear Planning Board Members,
I recently learned about the proposed improvementq at 115 N Keystone roughly
4-5 days prior to the October 19th 1 2004 meetmg. It was then Wayne Wells showed me
some rough sketches, nothing more detailed than maSsive garage whIch encroached on
current setbacks I was really sutpnsed to see It on a consent agenda! which IS why I
Invested lilY time and effort. There was nothing in this plan Kfor the neighborhood." It
would only increase traffic and be a visual eyesore with the grand modem scale of the
garage to the smaller house. Which is why I thought the proposal would be rejected or
sent ba.ck for SERIOUS consideration
So I have to invest more tIme because this proposal is up again and I feel It IS my
civic duty. I will not be here on November 16, so [must write this letter.
At the previous meeting I heard Mr. Wells in lus recommendanon to the board
state that there was a lot of public input on this one. He seemed to suggest the mput was
equally diVided. I found no evidence to suggest thal What we had in support was
someone who was denied party status by the board for not being a relevant WItness Also.
there were a few e-mails.AsIwent through these r noticed something about the subject
tine in these # 1) Requested by David and Sharon Cote. # 2) Importance LOW #3)
Phone call rc CDB case-this one is totally hard to tmderstand. #4) Is written by someone
who did something similar BUT in a single family house. Therefore I see little credible
SUpport for the proJect, especially verses the community opposltjon to allowing change of
non"conforming status.
I have owned the property next to the proposed SIte since t 989 and will bear
witness that pa.rkmg for that property has never been a concern for the area. Which is
why J dontt feel that CDC 3-1202 and code Sectlon 3-195A apply I also feel the analysis
of the site and the interpretation are m contradiction of the COC. esp. tn regards to
setbacks
Secondly, the Flexible Development Residentlal Jnfill Application seems vague
and ambiguous, brings up points to consider and makes improper assertions. I Will try to
be brief and touch on a few of these pomts:
from PAGE TWO of the FDRlA
Quesnon #1
The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale,
buIk,coverage, density and character of adjacent properties In which It js located. - The
FROM .Home Rentals & Realt~, In(
FAX NO 7275966958
~ov 12 2004 12:13PM P2
two adjacent properties are Smgle Family Residences. One With a detached one car
garage and the other Wlth a carport. I see no elavation drawi~g that would show how a
new roof and a paint job would make this duplex blend In with an out of scale garage
QuestIon#2
The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate
development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value
there of.-As an adjacent property owner I would be discouraged from makmg any
improvements to my property with an adjacent duplex.
Question#4
The proposed developed is desIgned to minunize traffic congestion.- There is no
traffic congestion.
from PAGE THREE of the FDRrA
Questi on #4
The U'ies or mix of use WithIn the residential infill project are compatIble With
adjacent land uses -The applicant refers to properties on "the same block" I'm not sure
if thIs refers to propertIes on Grove. Keystone or the property up on the comer of
Duncan near Drew but in any eVent are not adjacent.
Questton#S
The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infi U
project wIll upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. I'm
sure addmg all that square footage to their property should increase their value How it
may increase tlle value of my adjacent property is merely the applicants opimon and not
based on any fact.
Quostion#6 & #7
These questions refer to enhancmg community character!-I do not belIeve
anyone has made case for how this project WlllImprove my nelghborhoodl
AND Finally
There ore many,many unanswered issues and questions In tlus case. Now they are
adding plumbmg, where will the water meter go? How about the electnc for the garage,
and the secunty lighting, the water heater? Supposedly no pennit is required to bury an
electncal service. So where are the services for the power? Are there granted easements
to rruuntain the hook-ups? Do we know who's property they are on?' What about the
perim~er buffer?.Has that been done or is there a plan? I am only trying to maintain the
mtegnty oithe neighborhood every one enjoys so much,
Very truly yours
Mark Zubek
141~
FROM :Home Rentals & Realt~, lnc
FAX NO 7275966958
1ov. 12 2004 10 44RM P2
November 13, 2004
Via Facsimde- 562-4865
Clearwater Plannmg Department
Clearwater Development Board
100 S Myrtle Ave
Clcarwater~ FL 33756
RB 115 N. Keystone Dr
Dear Planning Board Members,
I recently learned about the proposed improvements at 115 N Keystone roughly
4-5 days prior to the October 19th, 2004 meeting. It was then Wayne Wells showed me
some rough sketches, nothing mote detailed than massive garage which encroached on
current setbacks. I was really surprised to see it on a consent agenda, which is why I
invested my time and effort. There was nothing in this plan ~for the neighborhood." It
would only Ulcrea:se traffic and be a visual eyesore WIth the grand modem scale of the
garage to the smal)er house. Which is why I thought the proposal would be rejected or
sent back for SERIOUS consideratton.
So I have to invest more time because tlus proposal is up agam and I feellt is my
CIvic duty. I Will not be here on November 16~ so I must write this letter.
At the previous meeting I heard Mr. Wells in Ius recommendatIOn to the board
state that there was a lot of public input on this one. He seemed to suggest the input was
equally divided. I found no evidence to suggest that. What we had in support was
someone who was denied party status by the board for not being a relevant witness Also,
there were a few e-mails.AsIwent through these I noticed something about the subject
hne 10 these. # 1) Requested by David and Sharon Cote. # 2) Importance LOW #3)
Phone call re COB case-this one is tetany hard to understand. #4) Is wntten by someone
who dId something similar BUT in a single family house. Therefore I see little credible
support for the project, especially verses the community opposItion to allowing change of
non"'COnforming status.
I have owned the property next to the proposed site smce 1989 and will hem:
witness that parkIng for that property has never been a conCern for the area Which is
why I don"t feel that CDC 3-1202 and code section 3-19SA apply. I also feel the analysIs
of the site and the Interpretation are in contradiction of the cne, esp. in regards to
setbacks
Secondly, the Flexible Development Residential IntiU ApplIcation seems vague
and ambiguous, brings up potnts to consider and makes improper assertions. 1 will try to
be brief and touch on a few of these points.
from PAGE TWO of the PORIA
Question #1
The propose? development of the land wilI be in harmony WIth the scalej
bulk. coverage. densfty and character of adjacent properties in which It is located - The
FROM Home Rentals & Realt~,In(
FRX NO 7275966958
lov. 12 2004 10 44RM P3
two adjacent properties are Smgle Family Residences One with a detached one car
garage and the other with a carport. I see no clavation drawing that would show how a
new roof and a paint job would make this duplex blend In with an out of scale garage.
Qucstlon#2
The proposed development wIll not hinder or discourage the appropnate
development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly unparr the value
there of -As an adjacent property owner I would be dIscouraged from makmg any
improvements to my property with an adjacent duplex.
Question#4
The proposed developed is designed to Il11Illmize traffic congestton,-There is no
traffic congestton. '
from PAGE TIlREE of the FDRIA
Quest1on#4
The uses or mix of use WIthin the residential mfIlI proj eet are compatible with
adjacent land uses.- The applicant refers to properties on "the same block." I'm not sure
if this refers to properties on Grove I Keystone or the property up on the comer of
Duncan near Drew but m any event arc not adjacent.
Questton#S
The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential inflH
project will upgmde the in:un~ate vicimty of the parcel proposed for development. I'm
sure adding all that square footage to their property should increase their value. How it
may mCrease the value of my adjacent property IS merely the applicants opmion and not
based on any fact.
Question#6 & #7
These questions refer to enhancing community character'-l do not belteve
anyone has made case for how this project WIll unprove my neIghborhood'
AND Finally.. . .
There are many1many Wl8nswered. issues and questions in this case. Now they are
adding plumbing, where will the water meter go? How about the electric for the garage,
and the secunty hghtmg, the water heater? Supposedly no permit is required to bury an
electncal service So where are the services for the power? Are there granted easements
to maintain the hook~ups? Do we know who's property they are on? What about the
penmeter buffer? Has that been done or is there a plan? I am only trymg to maintain the
mtegrity of the neighborhood every one enjoys so much.
Very truly yours
Mark Zubek
141J
(
~
Page 1 of3
Wells, Wayne
Subject
Importance
Mark & Linda ZubeklHome Rentals & Realty, Inc [homerent@tampabay rr com]
Friday, November 12, 2004 12 30 PM
Tarapanl, Cyndl, Haines, Angel, Gerlock, Chip, Albee, RiCk, Dittmer, Arden, Kurleman, Scott,
Reynolds, Mike, SChodtler, John, Wells, Wayne, Clayton, Gina, Parry, Mark
[SULK] Case#FLD2004-06044/115 Keystone Dr
Low
From
Sent
To
November 12,2004
CIty of Clearwater Plannmg Department
Commumty Development Board
100 S Myrtle Ave
Cledrv,later, FL 33758
Re Case # FLD2004-06044 Proposed development/tcrmmatlOn of non-confonmng status 115
Keystone Dr
Dear Board members,
1 have been struggling With the words to explam my concerns regardmg Case FLD2004-06044 I WIll
stdl t by pomtmg out to you that DaVid and Sharon Cote are smwltalleously applymg to you for TWO
umquely different thmgs
(1) a termmatlon ofnon-conformmg status AND
(2) the expansIOn of attached dwellmg WIth a reductIon to setbacks
The second of which IS contmgent upon the first I feel It IS IMPERATIVE that we address ONE Issue
at a tnne so we don't "put the cart before the horse"
ThIS letter wdl address thc first Issue, the request for tcrmmatlOn ofnon-conformmg status ThIS comes
filS!, because the Cotes must become a con[onmng or "as prachcal as possible to a conformmg status
"(pcr Clearwater Commumty Development Code, SectIOn 6-101, see below) 1I1 order to be granted
termmatlOl1 of non-conformmg status 1 do NOT see that thiS Issue has been addressed How are the
Cotes bnngmg their
non-cO/{orl1llllg dUDlex 111tO confornuty WIth thlS neighborhood whIch IS zoned SINGLE F AMIL Y
RESIDENTIAL? They are NOT They are not even attemptmg to bnng It mto conformity What they
are askmg us to do IS label Jt as couformmg, but allow It to contlllue to eXist and then to be expanded
{flUi col1tlllue to allow It to be used a~ a 1l001-collformmg duplex. THIS IS IN DIRECT VIOLATION
TO THE CODES!
Let us ask WHY tillS duplex IS labeled non-conformmg Because It IS 111 a smgle family reSidentIal
neighborhood When the neighborhood was zoned reSIdential, the CIty made a consCientIous effort to
label all non-conformmg properties so that they WOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO BE EXPANDED
UPONI They were m effect saymg, "Hey you don't fit m, but we']] let you stay until you're no longer
useful and then you Will be reqUIred to CONFORM III order to EXPAND" When the Cotes request
11/12/2004
1
Page 2 of3
these types of Improvements, they are askmg to expand thIS non-confonmng Duplex, when clearly the
code was created to PROHIBIT thIs
Directly from the Clearwater Commumty Development Code
Section 6-101. Purpose/applicability
The purpose of thIS divIsIOn IS to regulate and limit the development and contmued eXistence of
uses, structures and lots whIch were lawful on the date of the adoptIOn of thIS Code, but which
would be prohibited, regulated, or restricted under the terms established herein
While nonconfoTImtJes may contmue, it is the intent of this development code to bring
nonconforming properties into compliance with the provisions of this code in
conjunction with a change of use, redevelopment, or any other change of condition
of the property in order to eliminate the nonconformity or to bring the
nonconformity as practical as p-ossible to a conforming status.
(Drd No 6573-00, ~ 7, 8-3-00)
Section 6-103. Nonconforming uses.
A Nonconfonmng uses of land or structures, and nonconfonmng structures that contam
nonconformmg uses, may be maintained only III accordance With the proVISIons of thIS sectIon
B. Nonconformmg uses of land or structures shall not be expanded but normal repaIr and
mamtenance may be performed to allow the contmuatIon of the nonconformmg use
**C Except as provided in 6-109, a nonconforming use shall not be changed to
any other use UNLESS THE NEW USE CONFORMS to the standards of the zoning
district in which it is located. Once a nonconforming use is changed to a
conforming use, the nonconforming use SHALL NOT BE RE-
ESTABLISHED. **
The Cotes are askmg you to termmate their nonconforrnmg status, yet allow It to contmue It'S non-
conformmg use-but the code says "the nonconformmg use SHALL NOT BE RE-ESTABLlSHED'"
ALSO
Section 6-102. Nonconforming structures.
D. A nonconforming structure may be expanded:
11/12/2004
,"
Page 3 of3
1. If it is nonconforming SOLELY because of its failure to comply with the off-
street parking requirements of this development code and the enlargement will not
increase the required amount of parking by more than three additional spaces; or
2. If the expansion, when considered in isolation from the existing structure, is in
compliance with all requirements of this development code.
ALSO
In the Plannmg Department's own Staff Report, on the chart of COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS
AND CRITERIA (Page 4 or 6), three of the five cntena are INCONSISTENT with the reqUired
standards and en tena I
I hope you all can understand Think about your own homes If someone wanted to put a duplex next to
you and then make It bigger, would YOU allow It? We all know that multi-family duplexes and
tnplexes arc NOT allowed m single famIly resIdentIal neighborhoods because they are NOT
DESTRABLE The non-conformmg status of this property was created to PROTECT the neighborhood
from It'S expansIOn
PLEASE deny the Cotes request and let us enJoy our qUIet, RESIDENTTAL neIghborhood
Respectfully,
Lmda Zubek
Owner
1651 Grove St (right next door to the proposed additIOn)
ClealVlater, FL
PAGE 3 OF 3
11112/2004
Page 1 of3
Wells, Wayne
From Mark & Linda ZubekfHome Rentals & Realty, Inc [homerent@tampabay rr com]
Sent Friday, November 12, 2004 2 00 PM
To Tarapanl, Cyndl, Hames, Angel, Gerlock, Chip, Albee, RICk, Dittmer, Arden. Kurleman, Scott,
Reynolds, Mike, Schodtler, John, Wells, Wayne, Clayton, Gina, Parry, Mark
Subject [BULK] Follow-up to Case #FLD2004-06044/115 Keystone Dr
Importance Low
November 12, 2004
CIty of Clearwater Planmng Department
AttentlOn Wayne Wells, et al
100 S Myrtle Ave
Clearwater, FL 33758
Re Case # FLD2004-06044 Proposed developmentJtenmnatlOn ofnon-conforrnmg status 115
Keystone Dr
Dear Board members,
This letter comes In follow-up, In the event my request to deny termmatIon of non-conformmg status,
fell upon" deaf ears"
1, Lmda Zubek, own the property at 1651 Grove St, dIrectly next door to the proposed additIon 1 have
had my FlorIda Real Estate lteense Sll1ce 1988 The DUPLEX next door to us IS a non-conforrnmg
property When we bought our house on Grove St m 1989, this small duplex was next door When we
mqUlred, pnor to purchase, about the zonmg ofthlS property, we were told It was nonconformmg-It
would not be allowed to get any bigger, Just to be mall1taIned as It sat until such tIme as It conformed to
the surroundmg smgle famIly resldenl1al neighborhood
On this month's agenda you have before you a request to allow thIS duplex to be expanded upon AND
to allow It to encroach on the setbacks The owners, David and Sharon Cote, appeared before you at last
month's meeting explammg "how the addltlon was bemg bUIlt for the tenants" The words "stnctly for
the use of the tenants" were uttered tnne and agam-even as a proposed stipulatIOn to approval of this
project, yet the owner eventually revealed their true mtentlon was to use the third car garage for their
own "stuff' They expla111ed theIr own garage, located next door at 111 Keystone, was already "packed
to the rafters" Scveral nelghbors have borne witness to the fact that the Cotes are furnIture dealers and
have used one of the duplex umts as a show room And we, the neighbors were all concerned about the
true mtentlon of the new addItIOn's use
lfyou recall, above the 3-car garage they proposed a "storage 10ft" and between the new garage and
eXlstmg duplex they proposed a "breezcway" There was no mgress/egress from etther one bedroom
umt to the breezeway or the garage and when questIoned, the owner said "well, 1 thought we mIght put a
washer/dryer 111 there" There were no plOposed barner walls between garage bays or m the storage 10ft,
how would the tenant's secure thclr belongmgs from other tenants and the owners?
11/12/2004
Page 2 of3
At the last meetmg the board asked the Cotes to "scale down" theIr project to a two car garage But
what they have before you now IS Just FOUR FEET smaller than the prevIOus proposal, It s1111 has the
second story "storage loft" AND now the "breezeway" has become a laundry room A washer/dryer
now resIde III thIS wIde open screen room smack dab m the mIddle of our RESIDENTIAL
nelghborhood And to make matters worse, no one has provIded mtenor mgress/egress to the laundry
room, so the tenants will be forced to carry their laundry out their front doors, down the edge of Grove
St (nght next door to me) or through the front yard and through the screen door to the
"breezeway/laundry room" Wdl they be allowed to do thiS at any hour of the day or lllght? Would you
want thIs scenano III YOUR own qUiet smgle family resIdential neIghborhood? Do you thmk thiS one
bedroom duplex wIth It's oversIzed garage/storage loft/outside laundry room will IMPROVE our
neighborhood? Do you thmk It will Increase our property values? Do you thmk a potential buyer WIll
W ANT TO BUY the house next door to thIS monstrosity? Be honest Anyone who knows the slIghtest
bn about property values, knows multifamily properties are not worth as much as smgle famIly homes
We have zoned thiS property residential and that's how It should remam We are NOT mixed use Now,
how would YOU answer the questions regarding thiS case on your department's own
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
D WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS (Section 3-913 A)
o Provide complete responses to the SIX (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each crltena IS achieved, In
detail
1 The proposed development of the land will be In harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, denSity and character of adjacent
properties In which It IS located
2 The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropnate development and use of adjacent land and bUildings or
significantly Impair the value lhereof
3 The proposed development Will not adversely affect the health or safely or persons residing or working In the neighborhood of the
proposed use
4 The proposed development IS deSigned to minimiZe traffic congestIOn
5 The proposed development IS consistent with the community character of the Immediate VICinity of the parcel proposed for
development
6 The deSign of the proposed development minimiZeS adverse effects, Including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation
Impacts, on adjacent properties
o Provide complete responses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA (as
applicable) - Explain how each crltena IS achieved In detail
1 The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development IS otherwise Impractical Without devlallons from the
use, intensity and development standards
2 The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehenSive Inflll redevelopment prOject or resldentlallnfill project
Will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties (Include the eXisting value of the Site and the proposed value of the Site
With the Improvements)
3 The uses Within the comprehenSive Inflll redevelopment project are othelWlse permitted In the City of Clearwater
4 The uses or mix of use Within the comprehenSive Infill redevelopment prOject are compatible With adjacent land uses
5 SUitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses Within the comprehenSive Infill redevelopment project
are not otherwise available In the City of Clearwater
6 The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehenSive Inflll redevelopment project Will upgrade the
Immediate vIcinity of the parcel proposed for development
7 The deSign of the proposed comprehenSive Inflll redevelopment proJ8ct creates a form and funcllon that enhances the community
character of the Immediate VICInity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of ClealVlater as a whole
I 1/12/2004
Page 3 of3
8 Flexibility In regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are Jus!lfled by the benefits to community character
and the
Immediate VICinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole
9 Adequate off-street parking In the Immediate VICinity according to the shared parking formula In DIVIsion 14 of Article 3 Will be
available to
avoid on-street parking In the Immediate vICinity of parcel proposed for development
10 The deSign of all bUildings complies With the Tounst Dlstnct or Downtown Dlstnct deSign gUidelines In DIvISion 5 of Article 3 (as
applicable)
Use separate sheets as necessary
Page 6 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - ComprehenSive Intill Redevelopment PrOJect- City of Clearwater
I bel1evc, anyone, haVing honestly filled out the WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS above on
this ploJect would see that It DOES NOT achieve the cntena listed I therefore, respectfully request you
vote NO on this project
Sincerely,
Linda Zubek
Ownel
1651 Grove St
Clearwater
11/1212004
--
I!'
~...
.~
Virginia Newman
City of Clearwater
Planning Department
100 S. Myrtle Ave.
Clearwater, FL 33756
Re: 115 N. Keystone Dr.
To Whom It May Concern:
I am against the proposed three car garage with living area above. How
many rental units will this provide for the Cotes? This is an area of single
family homes which is comfortable living for us. The more units on a piece
of property the more cars you end up seeing all over the street or yard. No
driveway can hold them all.
Why start a situation that could escalate to a rental, transient area? Lets try
to keep our neighborhood for our families. I have a large lot, would you
want me to add on several rental units? No, I would not want that for
myself or my neighbors. This is easier to stop then to undo later.
Sincerely,
Virginia Newman
/~~~
~
ORIGINAL
~31VMM1:> :10 IJ.!:> -#
lN3,^,lWVd3C ~NJNN\f1d
~ooz..s 1 AON
a3^13:)3~
...
(
-~
To: Members of the Community Development Board
REF' FLD2004-06044
I, /~~ 1/~cW'-
/ b ~/ L ~ a- S~ p-1];o It/-a -t/ j/L.-
LIVE AT
15' 70's \
I DO NOT SUPPORT THE APPROVAL OF THE FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTED ON THE
property at 115 North Keystone Dnve, Clearwater
I do not agree with the large 2-car garage addition with two story roof planned for at this property
Comments
.\
'.
"
ORiGINAL
RECEIVED
NOV 1 ~2004
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
-~.
,-,'
COMM DEV BOARD/ PUBLIC HEARING
115 North Keystone Dnve
NOVEMBER/16/D4 MEETING
FLD2DD4-06044
I ,Elaine Hartman, live at 1614 Cleveland Street and have lived there for about 20 years
As a property owner In this Skycrest Neighborhood area I want to vOice my opinion about this revlsledl
REQUEST FOR A 2 CAR GARAGE ADDITION In the neighborhood with a 1 & % roofllne.
I FEEL THE ROOF LINE IS STILL EXCESSIVE for this SIZE rental duplex AND OVERSIZE CAR BAYS
NOT STANDARD CAR BAYS DISCUSSED BY COB MEMBERS AT LAST MEETING
There seems to be more considerations of monument signs than slze~helght of bUildings with In a
Nelg h borhood
To the members of this board:
I don't understand why a plan cannot be presented, with a reduced plan w/ STANDARD 2-car
addition/wa lower roof line that fits the duplex and surroundings homes In the area No amount of
landscaping Will buffer the sIze
I WOULD REQUEST FROM THE BOARD THE DENIAL OF THE STATUS OF NON CONFORMITY.
The 115 Keystone property IS a Income property-2/ 1- bed 1/bath apt- appx 625ft each w/ ample parking
drIveway provided Present date there are single occupants In duplex uSing the dnveways for parking
Not Side streets There is a side lot on East side of duplex that can utIlized for extra parkmg. Plus
space for a storage shed. Breeze way on this plan has now become a Laundry facility.
Being a Native Flondlan a Breeze way to me IS a connector from a dwelling to another bUlldlngs/ usually
near the kitchen door toward the garage w/ only roof over walk thru usually w/ table or chairs,
Purpose use would be for cooling down from the Florida sun day or night [Air circulation/cross venation]
Sincerely,
-r
Unable to attend meeting due to work schedule
OR\G\NAL
RECE!VED
NOV 15 200't
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
CIlV OF CLEARWATER "G-
: '
..
To: Members of the Community Development Board
REF: FLD2004-06044
I, L'//Z L1/2 ~ e./7}~Lrl' ~ e / LIVE AT
,/~3~cfl~h~ ", ~f/-,
J DO NOT SUPPORT THE APPROVAL OF THE FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTED ON THE
property at 115 North Keystone Drive, Clearwater
I do not agree with the large 2-car garage addltton with two story roof planned for at this property
Comments
OR\G\NAL
CEF [ )-
RE ~'~~'~~
NOV 1 5 ZU04
pLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
-
1550 Cleveland Street
Clearwater, FL 33755
R[ECfE~V[ED
November 7, 2004
Nuv U ~ 2004
Pb.A~N~NG DEPARTMIENT
C~TY OF ClEAR\NATER
Community Development Board,
Cyndl Tarapanl, Planning Director, and
Cynthia E Goudeau, City Clerk
City of Clearwater
PO Box 4748
Clearwater, FL 33758-4748
Re:
115 North Keystone Drive,
Notice of Continued Objection to Proposed Flexible Development
Dear Community Development Board, Planning Director & City Clerk,
Per the updated notice of City Public Heanng In thIs matter, I am wntlng to vOice my
continued objection as an Interested party to the proposed Flexible Development at 115
North Kevstone Drive, Keystone Manor, Blk 0, Lot 1 & 20, FLD 2004-06044 As
Indicated previously, I have a tremendous vested Interest In this neighborhood and any
such developments as I currently own ten properties In the Immediate Skycrest
Neighborhood With eight reSidential dwellings Two of these properties are located
Within very close proximity to 115 North Keystone Dr
I must continue to object on the grounds that the proposed structure would be
overwhelming In sIze and height, not shielded from view of the street and out of
character With the surrounding neighborhood architecture The proposed structure was
onglnally 32 feet WIde and 26 feet deep With a maximum height of 22 feet At the
October public heanng, which I attended, the Community Development Board clearly
I
directed the applicant to resubmit plans for a two-car, rather than a three-car garage
Despite this clear direction, the new proposal IS for a structure that IS 30 feet Wide and
26 feet deep This represents a reduction In size of only 6-%% m base area With no
reduction In height Are we to really beheve that a 2 feet reduction In thIs structure's
Width matenally changes Its appearance or Intended purpose? My research of two-car
garage plans available for sale Indicates that the standard dimensions are closer to 24' x
24', WIth some larger two-car garages extending to 28' X 26' Nothing close to the
dimensions proposed In this case
I continue to doubt that the true purpose for thIs structure IS to proVide ,off street parking
for reSidents of adjacent duplex units It appears that reSidents currently park on a
driveway situated on the proposed structure Site, so very little, If any, on street parking
currently occurs I would even suggest that If reSIdents are prOVided WIth a garage
space, they Will most likely use the space for theIr own personal storage and actually
begm parking on the street ThiS would completely defeat the stated purpose of the
structure
In summary, I stili must continue to vehemently object to this proposed Flexible
Development I would ask the Board to reject this proposal and direct the applicant to
submit plans for a garage that IS actually a two-car garage and not a three-car garage
thinly disguised In two-car garage clothing Furthermore, I would ask that the Board
mandate that any such structure approved In the future be required to be put to ItS
Intended use Approval of thiS structure In ItS current form would still signal a negative
trend for our neighborhood And qUite frankly, I would be dismayed If the Board
approved these plans after their prevIous direction was so obViously Ignored Thank you
for your conSIderation In thiS matter
Regards,
~ -tfI P-7~
Gary D Plyler
cc Bill Horne, City Manager, City of Clearwater
Frank Hibbard, Vice-Mayor, Clearwater City Councllmember
Joanna Siskin, President - Skycrest NeIghborhood Association
2
RECE~V(ED
1544 Cleveland Street
Clearwater, FL 33755
hUV U 0 7H!l~
November 8, 2004
:>>~..J\~~I~G DEPARTMENT
~ITY OF CLEARWATER
Community Development Board,
City of Clearwater
PO Box 4748
Clearwater, FL 33758-4748
Re:
Business Activities, 115 North Keystone Drive,
To Whom It May Concern
Due to the development proposal for a garage to be bUilt on the property at 115 North
Keystone Dnve, there have been many diSCUSSIons recently regarding potential
business actIVIties on the site Since 1 had some first-hand knowledge of such activities,
I wanted to relate my expenence to the Board on the chance that It might prove helpful
In the fall of 2003, my husband and I were looking to purchase a new bedroom set I
responded to an advertisement In The Flyer magazine and after speaking bnefly on the
phone With the owner, I was directed to 111 N Keystone Dr My brother accompanied
me and when we reached the home, we were taken to the duplex apartment next door
(115 N Keystone) to actua lIy view the furn Itu re The duplex was nicely fu rn I shed With
both living room and bedroom furmture Since I Inltlally assumed that I would be
purchasing the actual bedroom set I was viewing, I questioned a scratch In the wood of
one of the pIeces At thIS pOint I was Informed that the set I was looking at was Just for
dIsplay and If I were to make a purchase, additional sets were In boxes In the back As
we left the duplex, my brother expressed Interest In the leather sofa In the livIng room
and was Informed that the sofa as well as the pictures displayed on the walls of the living
room were also for sale In the end, my husband and I choose a different bedroom set
and I never contacted the phone number again I hope thiS InformatIon can be of some
assistance
Regards,
Christina Wise
.~ 'lo1ll
1550 Cleveland Street
Clearwater, FL 33755
RECE~VED
November 7,2004
Community Development Board,
Cyndl Tarapanl, Planning Director, and
Cynthia E Goudeau, City Clerk
City of Clearwater
PO Box 4748
Clearwater, FL 33758-4748
NUv U b 2U04
~"LA~N!NG DEPARTMENT
C~TY OF CLEARWATER
Re:
115 North Keystone Dnve,
Notice of Continued Objection to Proposed Flexible Development
Dear Community Development Board, Planning Director & City Clerk,
Per the updated notice of City Public Hearing In this matter, I am writing to vOice my
continued objection as an I nterested party to the proposed Flexl ble Development at 115
North Kevstone Drive, Keystone Manor, Blk D, Lot 1 & 20, FLD 2004-06044 As
Indicated previously, I have a tremendous vested Interest In thiS neighborhood and any
such developments as I currently own ten properties In the Immediate Skycrest
Neighborhood with eight residential dwellings Two of these properties are located
wlth10 very close proximity to 115 North Keystone Dr
I must continue to object on the grounds that the proposed structure would be
overwhelmmg In size and height, not shielded from view of the street and out of
character with the surrounding neighborhood archItecture The proposed structure was
originally 32 feet wide and 26 feet deep with a maximum height of 22 feet At the
October public hearing, which I attended, the Community Development Board clearly
directed the applicant to resubmit plans for a two-car, rather than a three-car garage
Despite thiS clear direction, the new proposal IS for a structure that IS 30 feet wide and
26 feet deep ThiS represents a reduction In sIze of only 6-%% 10 base area With no
reduction In height Are we to really believe that a 2 feet reduction In thiS structure's
width matenally changes ItS appearance or 10tended purpose? My research of two-car
garage plans available for sale Indicates that the standard dimensions are closer to 24' X
24', WIth some larger two-car garages extending to 28' X 26' Nothing close to the
dimenSions proposed In thiS case
I continue to doubt that the true purpose for thiS structure IS to provide off street parking
for reSidents of adjacent duplex units It appears that reSidents currently park on a
dnveway situated on the proposed structure Site, so very 'little, If any, on street parking
currently occurs I would even suggest that If reSidents are provided With a garage
space, they wIll most likely use the space for their own personal storage and actually
beg10 parking on the street ThiS would completely defeat the stated purpose of the
structure
1
'OJ~(c~~%l~ 10'\1
-11 NOV - BlJlO4 [0:
I
j
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
C-CnUI"""'r:::c-
o
:;:cJ
-
G'>
-
Z
):>
r-
..-'V'
In summary, I stili must contmue to vehemently object to this proposed Flexible
Development I would ask the Board to reject this proposal and direct the applicant to
submIt plans for a garage that IS actually a two-car garage and not a three-car garage
thmly dlsgU1sed In two-car garage clothing Furthermore, I would ask that the Board
mandate that any such structure approved In the future be reqUired to be put to Its
~
Intended use Approval of thiS structure In Its current form would stili signal a negative
trend for our neighborhood And qU1te frankly, I would be dismayed If the Board
approved these plans after their prevIous direction was so obViously Ignored Thank you
for your consideration In thiS matter
Regards,
b dJ;L?-yaJ
Ga;;6 Plyler
cc Bill Hor;re, City Manager, City of Clearwater
Frank Htf,tbard, Vice-Mayor, Clearwater City Councllmemb~!.
JO,91nna ~In, PresIdent - Skycrest Neighborhood Assoclaflbn
2
r::: - , ---=: ~ r:: n 1'\ .n r=--
[ _~ '-- .. ~ LJ _ =-_
r- .
- -U\ NOV - 8 2004 \~S,
PU\NNING & rJEVELOPMENl II
SERVICES
CITY OF ClS\RWATER i
o
:;0
-
G1
-
Z
)>
,--
...-'
1544 Cleveland Street
Clearwater, FL 33755
November 8, 2004
R[EC[E~V[ED
Commumty Development Board,
City of Clearwater
PO Box 4748
Clearwater, FL 33758-4748
Nuv U d 71JO~
PtA~~i~G DEPARTMENT
'Gtly OF CLEARWATER
Re:
Business Activities, 115 North Keystone Drive,
To Whom It May Concern
Due to the development proposal for a garage to be bUilt on the property at 115 North
Keystone Drive, there have been many diSCUSSions recently regardmg potential
business actIVities on the site Since I had some first-hand knowledge of such actiVIties,
I wanted to relate my experience to the Board on the chance that It might prove helpful
In the fall of 2003, my husband and I were looking to purchase a new bedroom set I
responded to an advertisement In The Flyer magazine and after speaking briefly on the
phone with the owner, I was directed to 111 N Keystone Dr My brother accompamed
me and when we reached the home, we were taken to the duplex apartment next door
(115 N Keystone) to actually view the furniture The duplex was nicely furnished with
both living room and bedroom furniture Since I Initially assumed that I would be
purchaSing the actual bedroom set I was viewing, I questioned a scratch In the wood of
one of the pieces At thIS pOint I was mformed that the set I was looking at was Just for
display and If I were to make a purchase, additional sets were In boxes In the back As
we left the duplex, my brother expressed Interest In the leather sofa In the liVing room
and was Informed that the sofa as well as the pIctures displayed on the walls of the liVing
room were also for sale In the end, my husband and I choose a different bedroom set
and I never contacted the phone number again I hope thiS Informatlon can be of some
assistance
Regards,
r--
o
:::cJ
-
G)
-
Z
-. ,-:::1 ~ r:::J 1"1 i\ n ~ -~_ - ~
( u ~ ~
'~~lSu\Y~/r\ r-
"J 'UJ
HI NOV - 8 2004 10!
c~~ tAJ~
Chnstlna Wise
IU
1
PLANNING & OEVELOPMENl
SERVICES
CITY OF CLEr\RWATER
,
7 November 2004
To: Wayne Wells, Senior Planner, and
Community Development Board
With regard to FLD2004-06044, 115 North Keystone Drive, Clearwater, FL
33755, request for Termination of Status of Nonconformity and other
requests including a large garage with additIOnal storage space and reduction
of setbacks, It IS my observation that the maJor opposition In the
neighborhood comes from a distrust of the owners, who have been said to
have pushed the City codes to their limits and beyond. There have been
accusations of work bel ng done on the Cote's property without the required
permits, operatmg wlthm the neighborhood a showroom for their furniture
business, and moving out the furniture on a Sunday night before the
CommunIty Response Inspector arrived on a Monday
It IS well known that many proJects throughout the City that reQUire permits
are done Without permits after hours and on weekends due to the Inadequate
staffing of code and building departments We have not been successful In
tryl ng to contact an I nspector after hours.
At the October hearing the Cote's indicated that they wanted to use some of
the garage for storage of their maintenance eqUipment for their rental
properties, as well as for the renters of the adJacent one-bedroom duplexes
If the proJect IS approved, given the past actions witnessed by neighbors, how
would the City enforce that the garage be for the sole use of tenants and not
for their business' I believe thiS to be the reason that several neighbors are
against the Termination of Status of Nonconformity and also oppose an
oversized two story garage. I hope you will take all thiS Into conSIderation
when determining thiS case.
Very truly yours
C--{/ :=>
~;It ~L<-
ORIGINAL
Elizabeth France
1629 Cleveland Street
Clearwater, FL 33755-6102
PlANNING a DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES
CllV OF ClEARWATER
. F\~iJM . Home Ren ta I s & Rea I tI"h I nc
,
FAX NO .7275966958
ct 19 2004 11 0BAM P2
ORIGINAL
October 19. 2004
CIty of Clearwater Planning Department
Attention: Wayne Wells, AICP
Senior Planner
100 S Myrtle Ave
Clearwater, FL 33758
Re' Ca.,e # FLD20Q4-06044 Proposed development/tennination ofnon--confonning
status 1] 5 Keystone Dr
Dear Board members,
We own the property at 1651 Grove St. Clearwater, which is RIGHT next to the propo!ied
building site. We have many Concerns about what is being proposed. We hope to alert
you to some of our conCerns so that this project does not get "pushed lhrough" too
qu.ckly causing potential detrimental effects on our conununity.
This property already houses a non-confonning duplex. It aloo already hits "reduced
setbacks!' It is a small duplex W1th a one bedroom apartment on each side. A three car,
two story garage seems excessive. What is the purpose of the 12' x 20' breezeway?
There appears to be no ingress/egress to either the breezeway or the garagef'storage 10ft"
from either unit-who wIll really be using this additional SpaCe? It ~eems adding all thig
parking/storage area Will only encourage more traffic and overcrowding of this NON-
CONFORMING multifamily property.
OUT neighborhood is zoned RESIDENTIAL. It is a quaint, quiet area, with small, modest
homes. Most of the homes in our subdivision are 2 - 3 bcdrootn/1-2 baths with slOgle car
carports or garages The purpose of the label "non-confonning use" IS to CLEARLY
identify a property that does not fit in with the composition of a neighborhood or the
zoning and ordinances in which it resides. This dwe11ing is already a duplex located In a
residential neIghborhood. It has been "grandfathered in" so to speak The status of "non-
conforming use" does NOT allow this non-confonmng use to be expanded upon. This
Was done to protect the neighborhood from expansion of tins NON-CONFORMING
multifaml.ly property which is EXACTLY what the owner is now petitIoning to do I It
goes against the whole purpose of the code
We are VERY concerned about the si7e of this garage. Jt is MASSNE In comparison to
our house, and to all of the other houses in the neighborhood! It will TOWER over our
home. It derm1tely does NOT conform with the style and size of Ute homes in our
neighborhood. Out house is a mere 2 bedroom/I bath with a one ear carport-as are
MOST of the house!!: on our street and in our subdivision
We also object to reducing the front setback for this addition by five feet We have n
large pIcture window and a front porch with very enjoyable neIghborhood views.
Allowing th1s garage to be moved five feet forward will not only obstruct our VICW---
FRoM
Hbme Rentals & Realt~,Inc
I
FRX NO.
7275966958
ct. 19 2004 11 09RM P3
especially in compari~otl to the open npace that is there now, but It win also "crowd us
in", encroaching (tn our feelings of spaciousness and openness. This is why fences are
not allowed to be moved forward into the setbacks, A SIX foot fence would not be
a]]owedl yet you would consider allowing a TWENTY foot garage? This IS unacceptable
to us.
T am a licensed, Plonda real estate broker and have owned a property management
business here in Pmcllas County smce 1994. In ALL my years in sales and rentals
(totaling oyer IS years) [have NEVER seen such a disproportionate sight! Why two tIny
one bedroom apartments need an 852 square foot, three car garage with second story
"lon~~ I'll NEVER understand. It seems, from my experience, that thIS "loft" will most
certainly be used as some type of Jiving space at some point jf this addition is allowed.
Even ifTH1S owner has no intention of doing so, you best believe at some point In the
future this will be contemplated and very possibly acted Upon.
A nother big consideration is the fact that the owner of this duplex LIVES directly behind
it. It seems odd to me, again as a realtor, that there is no proposed ingress/egress from
either duplex uflit to tho garage. Interestingly, tl1ere IS however direct access to the
garage from the OWNER'S home through a gate to thit:) garage. It appear$ as If there is
some intcre..1;[f to "commingle" the use of the garage on this property with the owner's
contiguous property, Access to the garage, as it is proposed. is easier for the owner, yet
they say the garage is being bwlt for the tenants. Why a fHREE car garage for a TWO
unit complex -units 'WIth only one bedroom each, at that? Again PH say this 18
EXCESSNE.
We have owned our home at 165 I Grove St since 1990 We have NEVER seen that
parking at this duplex has been an ISSue It appears, to ~ that these one bedroom urnts
have each had only one car per Wlit at any given time. This property, built ill 1949, never
even had a DRlVEWA Y untiI1992! Now It has TWO driveways which provide ample
parkIng for these small units. We do not want thIs non-confonning property expanded
upon.
We bave heard, on more than one occasion, that Mr. & Mrs. Cote have been nuunng
some kmd of furrnture business from their home, and also have, em occasion~ aqwred and
sold a large number oftrucke and commercial vehicles. It makec; us wonder what the
'1rue use" ofthJ.s masSIve 3 car garage and 2nd story storage space will be Won't adding
tlllS type of cttoragc and parking only encourage more reSIdents, CBJ'ft, and "hustle-bustle"?
We do not want to encourage tlns in our qwet. residential neighborhood
The owner provides, 1U his request, examples of two other neighborhood homes that have
added garages in recent years. NOTE. These are both single famtly homes whose
garages were added in confonmty to the houses themselves. The front elevations arc not
grossly disproportionate to the homes and flow with the basic height of the subject homes
1.0 which they were added AND the homes throughout the neighborhood. The only one
they give an address on, the IU'8t one labeled as 1661 Harvard St. 15 a Single family
PROM :Home Rentals & Realt~.Inc
)
FRX NO :7275966958
'ct. 19 2004 11 09RM P4
residence on all 0 x 138 lot (.34 ACRES), the subject duplex is on a lot mea.~uring
merely 51 x 138 ( 162 ACRES)--it is half the size!
We, therefore, object to thlS project as it has been proposed We vehemently object to tho
terminatIon of it's non-conforming status It is a non-conforming duplex in a residential
neighborhood and should remain labeled as such until it's multifamily use is truly
terminated. The buildmg already encroaches into the setbacks. Allowmg this oon-
confonning property to grow to such a grand scale goes against the spirit and purpose of
the code. You may find this to be a l'back door approach" to a potential ''mess''. Once
this has been done, It can not so easily be ~"ndone"-we want to assure the value and
conformity of our neighborhood.
Owner, 16 rove St
A contiguous residential home
Watkins, Sherry
OtlG1NAL
From
Sent
To
Subject
Chase, Susan
Monday, October 18, 2004 8 34 AM
Tarapanl, Cyndl, Watkms, Sherry
FW Comm Dev Meeting on Tues, Oct 19 2pm
See message below
Susan Chase
Off~c~al Records and Leg~slat~ve Serv~ces
(727) 562-4099
-----Or~g~nal Message-----
From Internet_Comment_Card [ma~lto Internet Comment Card]
Sent Sunday, October 17, 2004 8-58 PM
To Clerkweb
SubJect Comm Dev Meet~ng on Tues, Oct 19 2pm
Sender's Name Ellen V Knowles
Date sent 10/17/2004 7 57 37 PM
Comments
I would l~ke to make a statement on the request by Dav~d A & Sharon A Cote for a
flex~ble development approval at 115 North Keystone Dr , Key tone Manor, Blk D, lot 1 & 20
FLD2004-06044
I bel~eve that th~s bu~ld~ng would enhance the ne~ghborhood I would l~ke to say that I
approve th~s bu~ld~ng I l~ve at 1635 Laura St and I rece~ved a Not~ce about the
hear~ng, but am work~ng and unable to attend
Thank you
Sender Ema~l
Ma~l~ng Address
Phone
Page 1 of 1
-..
Wells, Wayne
From Lynn Plrreca [lplrreca@bellavlstalnc com]
Sent Mond ay, October 18, 2004 1 0 57 AM
To Wells, Wayne
Subject FLD20Q4-06044
ORIGINAL
Mr Wells,
I live In Clearwater at 1671 Laura Street, Just around the corner from DaVid and Sharon Cote They want to bUild
a 3 car garage on their property at 115 North Keystone Drive and I am writing to let you know that I am In favor of
the construction They keep their property Immaculate and a three car garage Will enhance the corner even more
Thanks,
Lynn P/rreca
1671 Laura Street
Clearwater, FL 33755
727-442-7508 home
727-643-6916 cell
10/19/2004
~
Rhoe Saportto R N.
1670 Laura Street
Clearwater, Flortda 33755
(72 7)446-7854/458-7707
ORIGINAL
September 16, 2004
C1 hJ of Clennvnter
Plmm mg Department
100 South Myrtle Ave
Cleanvnter, Fl 33756
A tt COI!II!W III hJ Develop1llen t Bonrd
RE FLD2004-06044 - 115 North Keystone, Keystone Manor, Blk D, Lot 1 & 20
Denr Bonrd Members,
ThIS letter IS to notIfy the CIty of Clearwater, that I am In SUppOl t of David & Sharon
Cote bmldmg a three-car garage at 115 North Keystone Dnve
r have owned 1671 Lama Street for over 15 yeaIs and 1670 for approxImately 4 years I
have done a great deal of implOvements to both propertIes I am ill the plaruung stages,
(WIth the CIty'S applOval of comse,) renovahng 1671 Laura Sheet WIth that saId let me
take thIS opportumty to show you the ieasons why I am plOcrashnatmg
Reason # 11661 Laura Street - Tar paper patchmg eIther a whole and/ or to
plevent a leak It has been theIr for applOxIrnately 2 plus years, and not to menhon the
garbage that IS consIstently pIled rn the car port I would rather be hvrng next to or
around the Cote's and theIr 3-car garage
Reason # 21665 Laura Sheet In the front theIe IS an awmng that IS on Its last
\ eg and ha If fallmg down and a t the vel y least m need of a coat of pamt The back yard
IS not only a havesty, but also a health haLard Due to the over glOwn vegetahon I
have personally ~een a famIly of oposwms commg from then yard and run across my
back yard at rnght Not to menhon the rats Let me menhon the gal bage, the 3 small
sheds to aVOId bmldmg one large shed and havmg to get a pcnrut Agam, I would
1 ather hve aCIoss 01 next door to a l1lcely done 3-caI galage If It weren't for my son and
hIS hfe long h lends, the mess that I look would have made me leave, howeveI I queshon
If I want to Improve any further
The Cote's have done outstandmg WOl k to the vanous properhes that they own and I
am aSSUled that the garage would be a great Improvement to the neIghborhood and
sel ve as an amemty fO! theIr tenants
Smcelely,
Rhoe M Saponto, R N
Cc Mr & Mrs Cote
10/19/04
09:36
PIN~I I RS CNTY PERSONNEL EOS DIU ~ 9562457~
NO 115 [1102
~ ~
TO:
City of Clearwater CommunIty Board
nD re~~O\l7~ rm
uu OCT 1 9201141lill
FROM:
Ken and Carol Strickland
1634 Laura St
Clearwater, FJ,
DEVElOPMENT SERVICES DEPT
CITY OF ClEAR'NATER
DATE-
October 19,2004
RE-
David A. &. Sharon A Cote, Flexible Development
115 Nonh Keystone Dr
Keystone Manor, Blk D, Lot 1 & 20
FLD2004.06044
ORIGINAL
Ken and [ wish to show our support for the Cotes and therr request to develop the duplex
at 1) 5 North Keystone Drive. While we are Wlable to attend the bearing to show our
support, we hope that this letter will serve in om place
Any questions for us may be directed to myseU: Carol, at 464-3796 work or 639-3771
cell, or Ken at 63Q- 3769 cell
Thank you fur your time
Wells, Wayne
From
Sent
To
Subject
Christina Boltln [chnstl0205@hotmall com]
Sunday, October 17, 20041058 PM
Wells, Wayne
Agenda Item #4-case FLD2004-06044 115 N Keystone Dnve
ORIGINAL
Oct 17, 2004
Dear Commuolty Development Board Members
RE
Agenda Item #4-case
FLD2004-06004 115 N Keystone Drlve
My name lS Jeff Boltln I llve at the Cote's rental at 115 N Keystone Dr
I have llved there for 2 1/2 years My slster llves next door My f1ance
stays wlth me frequently When she VlSlts, she must park 1/2 grass 1/2
street We fully support the Cotes on thls garage add1tlon For It lS to
only beneflt us (the tenants) W1th th1S addltlon, It wlIl not only help
wlth the parklng for us but also a place to safely store our belonglngs,
tools, blkes, sports equlpment, car care stuff, ect The Cotes are not only
our landlords, but also good frlends We appreclate the effort put forth 1n
lmprovlng our llvlng area The addltloo w1ll look nlce and f1t 10 Just floe
wlth the surroundlng nelghbors
slncerely,
Jeff BoltlO
115N Keystone Dr
Clearwater, FL 33755
Chrlst1na Boltln
1647 Grove Dr
Clearwater, FL 33755
Check out Electlon 2004 for up-to-date electlon news, plus voter tools and
morel http //speclal msn com/msn/electlo02004 arrnx
1
Page 1 of 1
Wells, Wayne
From
Sent
To
Subject
Importance
nlckandshannon [nlckandshannon@prodlgy net]
Sunday, October 17,20041051 AM
Wells, Wayne
[BULK] 115 N Keystone Dr
Low
ORIGINAL
Dear Mr Wells
We are writing In aVid support of the expanSion of property owned by Dave and Sharon Cole al115 N Keystone
Dr As neighbors who have also done some renovations and added a second level, we welcome the upgrades
that are happening around us, and are stili hoping for a renaissance to happen In the Sky Crest area We are sure
thai the Cote's will design the new addition (three car garage) In the same good taste that they have shown with
all their other properties
Sincerely
Nick and Shannon Beck
1612 Laura St
Clw 33755
10/17/2004
budget Self Storage
2180 Drew Street
Clearwater, Florida 33765
(727) 443-5200
(727) 441-4199 fax
RECEIVED
OCT 11 2004
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
13 October 2004
ORt GINAL
To Whom It May Concern
Re' The Furmture Girl
2180 Drew 8t
Clearwater, FL 33765
ThiS letter IS to mform the City of Clearwater and the Commumty Development Board
that Sharon Cote of 111 N Keystone Dr , Clearwater, FL 33755, has been domg busmess
here (Budget Self Storage, 2180 Drew Street, Clearwater, FlOrIda 33765) smce May
2002
Her busmess IS "The Furmture Gul " All of her shIpments are received here All of her
dehveries and customer pIck.ups are done here She currently rents four 10'x20' uruts
(#116, #117, #118, and #119)
She has had these umts for over two years and IS a valued customer
Please feel free to contact me, WIth any questIOns
Very truly yours,
JodyS BJ,; ~~
General Manager
cc file
Wells, Wayne
From
Sent
To
Cc
Subject
PatriCia Cleary [pclearycross@hotmall com]
Friday, October 15, 2004 4 02 PM
Wells, Wayne
DCOTE1@TAMPABAY RR COM
David Cote
ORIGINAL
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD
RE FLD2004-06044
DAVID & SHARON COTE
115 N KEYSTONE DR
CLEARWATER FL 33755
THIS LETTER IS TO INFORM THE CITY OF CLEARWATER AND THE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD THAT DAVID COTE, OWNER OF
MAD FUSION INC CURRENTY RENTS A SECURE PARKING AREA FROM
US FOR HIS THREE- FORD F-350 BUCKET TRUCKS, ONE COMMERCAIL
BOX TRUCK, AND TWO SPLICING TRAILERS HE HAS RENTED THIS SPACE
FROM US SINCE MARCH 2004 HE IS A SUB-CONTRACTOR FOR US
(CROSS COMMUNICATIONS) DOING WORK FOR BRIGHTHOUSE ALL OF
HIS WORK IS IN PASCO AND HERNANDO COUNTY
I UNDERSTAND THE COTE'S ARE PROPOSING TO DO A GARAGE
ADDITION TO ONE OF THEIR RENTAL PROPERTIES, AND IT HAS BEEN
BROUGHT UP THAT HE MIGHT BE STORING THESE VEHICLES THERE
THESE ACCUSATIONS ARE IMPOSSIBLE, DUE TO THE SIZE OF THESE
VEHICLES
CURRENTY MR COTE DRIVES HIS PERSONAL VEHICLE (98FORD RANGER)
TO THIS LOCATION, MEETS WITH HIS CRUE OF EMPLOYEE'S THEY HEAD
OUT TO WORK WITH THE COMMERCIAL VEHICLES AND RETURN THEM ON
A DAILY BASIS
SINCERELY,
PATRICIA CLEARY
CROSS COMMUNICATIONS
1023 GUNN HWY
ODESSA, FLORIDA 33556
Express yourself ~nstantly w~th MSN Messenger' Download today - It's FREEl
http //messenger msn cllck-url com/g%nm00200471ave/dlrect/Ol/
1
RECEIVED
UL: f 1;) 2UU4
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARDI PUBLIC HEARING 10/19/04
REF, FLD2004-06044
DAVID & SHARON COTE
115 NKEYSTONE DR
CLEARWATER FL 33755
I AM A PROPERTY OWNER IN THE SKYCREST AREA AND HAVE LIVED HERE
FOR OVER 40 YEARS MY WIFE AND I HAVE VIEWED THE PLANS AND
AGREE THIS WOULD BE AN IMPROVEMENT IN THE AREA WE ALSO FEEL
IT WOULD INCREASE PROPERTY VALUES IN THE AREA THERE ARE MANY
OTHER 2 AND 3 CAR GARAGES IN THE AREA ALONG WITH 2 STORY HOMES
FROM WHAT I UNDERSTAND THIS WILL ONLY BE A 1/2 STORY ABOVE FOR
STORAGE WHICH WOULD NOT MAKE IT POSSIBLE FOR RENTAL SPACE
IN THE FUTURE I GIVE MY FULL SUPPORT TO T::JE COTE' THEY HAVE
MADE MANY IMPROVEMENTS IN THE AREA
1J~ Uv-O- ? &a/UJ1/(
;/:;Y ~p .
/61J()~~-~ -
g~~ ?~
~ -=s "7-::;,::'''"'--
ORIGINAL
RE 115 N Keystone DrIve
Page 1 of 1
Wells, Wayne
ORIGiNAL
From Pettinato, PJ [PJ Pettlnato@trane com]
Sent F n day, October 15, 2004 4 55 PM
To Wells, Wayne
Subject RE 115 N Keystone Dnve
Mr Wells,
I would like to make clear my support of the garage project planned by David and
Sharon Cote of 111 North Keystone Drive, Clearwater, FL 33755
A neighbor of the Cote's for numerous years now, I've known them to be very respectful
of other neighbors, and very diligent In keeping their properties clean, and well
maintained TheIr presence In our neighborhood IS a positive one
The Cote's have a project under review at thiS time regarding a residential garage for
their tenants at 115 North Keystone Dnve I have seen the plans, and support them
100%
Clearwater only benefits from residents such as the Cote's They consistently Improve
the appearance of their neighborhoods, Increase property value, and are an Integral part
of Improving our neighborhood with each passing year
Your approval of their garage project would only serve to continue thiS fine tradition
Thank youl
P J Pettlllato
J 04 North Keystone DrIve
Clearwater, FL 33755
(72 7) 480-5950 (mobIle)
10/15/2004
RECE~VED
S NOEL WHITE AND JACK F WHITE ill
105 NORTH KEYSTONE DRIVE
CLEARW ATER, FL 33755
UL I 1;; 7004
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CiTY OF CLEARWATER
October 14, 2004
CIty of Clearwater
AttentIOn Wayne Wells
Planmng Department
100 S Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, FL 33756
Via FaCSImile - 562-4865
ORiGINAL
RE Davld A and Sharon A Cote, 115 North Keystone Drive, Clearwater, FL
FLD2004-06044
Dear Members of the Commumty Development Board
We live at 105 North Keystone Drive, Clearwater, Florida, and received notice ofMr and Mrs Cote's plan
to build a 1 Y2 story three car garage attached to the duplex at the above address We support the Board's
approval of the Flexlble Development plan submltted by the Cotes and request that the Board approve the
plan
lhff ~.eys~~nt: M.~r9r subdl v{~wn IS, a very dl verse commun Ity unh ke so man yother ,>ubdl VISIons m Pme lIas
Co~ntY Wlthm a' 5 block rachus you have many dIfferent Sized lots whIch contall1 cJupleAes, smgle family
one-QtoTY dnd two story homes, multi-family housmg, etc There are homes that were bUlIt m the 1940's With
much newer homes bUllt on the same block The Cote's plan to Dudd d three Cdr garage would greatly
Improve the subject property The plan would not detract from the neighborhood and WIll most hkely result
1I1111creasmg the value of surroundmg propertIes Several reSidents wlthm a 5 mde radlUs of the ;;;ubJect
property have recelVed perrmSSlOn to build a three car garage and the Cote's plan would adequately he the
new structure mto the eXIstmg duplex on the property
We know that some people have objected to the plan and have asserted that the Cote's would use the area
on top of the garage as additIonal hVll1g space FIrSt, thiS would be ImpossIble smce the addIttonal space IS
only a Y2 story The area would be available to the tenants of the duplex for storage A three car garage IS
necessary so that the tenants of the property can park their vehICles under cover leavmg sufficlCnt space
aVallable ror me lawn eqUipment and other Items (currently stored 1I1 a shed that IS on the property) used to
mamtam the property The look of the proposed garage would not be mconsIstent WIth other structures m
the neighborhood smce there are a number of structures 111 Keystone Manor that have two full story garages
The Plannmg Department has carefully reviewed the plans submitted by the Cotes and have recommended
that the Board approve the plan We urge the Board to follow the staff's recommendatIon
rL
, ,
Smcerely,
~ ....... -J'
\ J
"
1 '
,-
-"\ .
~oa ~rJl ~".J.f~~l! 8' J ;t.....~0:.r.c,. r. JJ2 "'j C t i1.....r
~}~l}~8~Y.li}!e ffi~,d }}:Sk :: '-i1\\11ge, Wff v'
"')Jj~t T;nll .dill ire {.;2 J o~'pl..~1" 2rI..')qL '"'H...~ ~ ; ~..,rJ.,("r'r~~
Wells, Wayne
From
Sent
To
Subject
LI-Lee Tunceren [tuncerenl@hotmatl com]
Thursday, October 14, 2004 9 30 PM
Wells, Wayne
[BULK] 115 No Keystone Dr
ORIGINAL
Importance Low
Dear Mr Wells,
I was surprlsed today to hear that some dlssent was expressed about the
planned the garage and storage area on the corner of Keystone and Grove
The Cote's are good nelghbors whose property lS always well-malntalned
Thelr acqulsltlon of 115 No Keystone lS a plus to thls nelghborhood as thelr
plans wlIl enhance not only thelr own property value but those of
surroundlng homes Certalnly they wlII bUlld thelr addltlon wlth quallty
materlals and workmanshlp
please accept thlS letter as a show of publlc support for the Cotes and
thelr plans to better thlS nelghborhood
Thank you,
Ll-Lee Tunceren
1615 Laura St
Clearwater, FL 33755
Express yourself lnstantly wlth MSN Messenger I Download today - It's FREEl
http !!messenger msn cllck-url com!go!onm00200471ave!dlrect!Ol!
Wells, Wayne
From
Sent
To
Subject
sabbolt58@knology net
Friday, October 15, 2004 902 AM
Wells, Wayne
request by David and Sharon Cote
ORIGINAL
Dear Mr Wells,
I am wrltlng ln support of the request by Davld and Sharon Cote to bUlld a
3 car garage I have llved ln thlS neighborhood for 5 years and they have
always kept the1r property neat and clean They are wonderful people and
the1r tenants seem very happy to have them as landlords I personally have
no Ob]ectlon to the bU1ld1ng of a 3 car garage I have no doubt 1t wlll be
better kept than some of the houses 1n the ne1ghborhood I 1mplore you to
grant the1r request, as truly 1t 1S to benef1t the1r renters They have no
plans to run any bus1ness out of 1t, or use 1t for anyth1ng but what 1t 1S
deslgned for
Slncerely,
Sandra Abbott
1666 Laura St
Clearwater, Fl 33755
727-239-0429
1
Watkins, Sherry
9Rt6tNAl
From'
Sent
To
Cc
Subject
Norman, LOIS
Tuesday, October 12, 2004 11 53 AM
Tarapanl, Cyndl, Clayton, Gma
Hames, Angel, Watkins, Sherry, Chase, Susan
Phone call re CDS case
We received a call In our office from Havovm Engineer (416-293-0192), property owner 117 North Keystone Drive, who
wanted to let us know of her support for 115 North Keystone Drive, FLD2004-06044
1
September 8, 2004
RECEIVED
City of Clearwater Planning Department
Att: Mr. Wayne M. Wells, AIePf Senior Planner
100 S. Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, FL 33758
OCT J 1 2004
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Re: Letter to the Community Development Board Members
For meeting scheduled for Tuesday, October 19,2004
Agenda Item #4- Case: FLD2004~06()44... 115 North Keystone Drive
ORIGINAL
Dear Community Development Board Members'
We, the undersigned CrestLake area neighbors, ask that you deny the request for variance for
the above property located at the comer ofN. Keystone Drive and Grove Street. It is evident that the
proposed addition to the eXISting duplex IS out of character With the surroundIng resldentml
neIghborhood
As a duplex the property is presently non--conforming to the single famtly residential
neighborhood. In additlon the existing duplex structure maintains setbacks that are already less than
those reqwred by code and less than those existmg in the surroundmg neighborhood.
The proposed addition ofa 3-car garage and the second level loft (which will most smely become a
living space in the future) combine to create a structure out of scale with the existing duplex and the
neighborhood. The massing, style, arched window with stucco band on the front, T -111 siding on the
sides and the back offer no '''form and function which enhances the commuruty character of the
immediate vicinity of the parcel" and offers little or no hope as to "upgradmg the immedIate VICffilty of
the parcel" as reqwred by our City's Fexible Cnteria for Infill Projects
While it seems cleariy evident to us that the previous paragraph is accurate, one can argue
aesthetIcs since, for example, some homeowners may like a purple house with hme green banding The
remainder of this letter will focus on items that are factual and not a matter of interpretation, as we
hope you will agree.
The Applicant is requesting reduced setbacks from our community standards on two sides of
the proposed addItion, one on the North side facing Grove Street and the other on the South SIde. If
granted Grove Street will now have this oversIZed 3~car garage five feet closer to the street, and please
note that there are very few, ifany, 3-car garages In the neighborhood. More glaring in the "form and
function" of this proposed addition having a detrimental effect on the neighborhood is the request for a
5' -0" setback on the south slde of the parcel.
ThIs reduced setback, along with the height and scale, will prOVide an unposing structure
overlooking adjacent properties (note: the fact that the same owner of the parcel presently owns the
parcel immediately to the South has no beanng on the fact that the proposed structure will have a
negatIve effect to VICinIty parcel property values). Therefore, the proposed development of the land 1)
will not "be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density, and character of adjacent properties in
which it is located" and 2) "the desIgn of the proposed development" will Dot "mimmize adverse
(VISual) effects ...on adjacent properties."
As you know, our own Flexible Criteria for Site Plan Approval lists as the #1 Item the
following as a requirement for the granting of an approval, "the parcel proposed for development is
otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity and development standards" We are
unaware of any submitted evidence that imhcates that this presently viable property is impractical
without the grantmg of the reduced setbacks as requested.
We also oppose the request for Termination of Status ofNon.comfomuty for the density for
adding a 3-car garage in lieu of the fact that the size and scale of this garage IS out of character in thIs
vicinity and neighborhood.
We love our area and see the multiplication of many positive improvements in our
neighborhood, but thIs proposal is not one of them. We ask that you consIder thIs as a proposed
"upgrade" to a home on your street and whether or not you would support a reduction of the written
and well studied community standards for the nnplementation of this construction .. one that Will
surely have a lastmg affect on long term neighborhood property values.
We thank each of you as Commumty Development Board Members for the service you provide
our CIty.
Sincerely,
(1)~~
() I ~ I ND Crest ft-\t4...
CJuvuuaJIiu{;fJ- 337SS"
fl~.JJ.} f),jp ~jif
~
It. 48 Ci2&tJe 51
'5)--
e I ckll f.-J19')e.e,r'f. $$7.
.....
LM
118M Ke~+~ 1)(
{!e4/c,.kL.1 rL 3'5)55
-
),
ORIGINAL
t
1550 Cleveland Street
Clearwater, FL 33755
RECEIVED
lli ~ ~ ~_U_ W r~ ffii\
~;~~;~~;Jl
()L ( 1 1 ZU04
October 7, 2004
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Community Development Board~~TY OF CLEARWATER
Cyndl Tarapanl, Planning Director, and
CynthIa E Goudeau, City Clerk
City of Clearwater
PO Box 4748
Clearwater, FL 33758-4748
Re: 115 North Keystone Drive,
Notice of Objection to Proposed Flexible Development
Dear Community Development Board, Planning Director & City Clerk,
Per the notice of City Public Heanng, I am wntlng to VOice my objection as an Interested
party to the proposed Flexible Development at 115 North Kevstone Drive, Keystone
Manor, Blk D, Lot 1 & 20, FLD 2004-06044 I have personally reSided at 1550
Cleveland Street for over thirty-five years and currently own ten properties In the
Immediate Skycrest Neighborhood WIth eight reSidential dwellings Two of these
properties are located Within very close proximity to 115 North Keystone Dr
Subsequently, I feel that I have a tremendous vested Interest In the neighborhood and
any such proposed developments
My pnmary objection to the FlexIble Development IS that the proposed structure would
be overwhelming In size and height, not shielded from view of the street and out of
character With the surrounding neIghborhood architecture My understanding of the
proposed construction IS for a two-story, three-car garage of 26' X 32' ThiS mdlcates
that a base square footage of 832 square feet for a garage Will be attached to a dwellmg
that IS a mere 1,152 square feet, representing over 70% of the dwelling's base area
Furthermore, the proposed structure would nse to some 22 feet at Its apex, dwarfing the
small dwelling to which It IS attached and standing out as one of the few structures In the
entire area that nses above one story Our Skycrest area IS a quaint, well-estabhshed
neighborhood Approval of thiS development would represent a complete departure from
the norm and would result In a structure completely out of character With the
neIghborhood
It IS my understanding that the pnmary purpose for the proposed two-story, three-car
garage IS to prOVIde off street parkmg for reSidents of the two, one bedroom Units located
on the property A cursory inspectIon of the property on any given evemng Will
demonstrate that reSidents currently park. on a driveway constructed for that purpose, so
very little, If any, on street parking currently occurs I would submit for the Board's
conSideration that the true dnvmg force for the proposed development IS a deSire for
more storage capacity on the part of the owner
1
,
~
,
What baffles me as a homeowner, however, IS not so much the proposed development
of a structure that violates so many of our city standards, but the fact that the City of
Clearwater planning staff IS recommending approval of It In the Fall of 2002, I
approached the City staff WIth a proposal to build a one-story, two-car garage on an
enttrely vacant lot attached to one of my reSidences well shIelded from view of the street
WIth a fence and foliage My proposal was rejected out of hand Ultimately, I had to go
before the board to receive a vanance to place a 12' X 24' portable garage on thiS
property ThIS Inconsistency In the Crty Planning Department's handhng of reSident
proposals IS disconcerting to say the least
In summary, I must vehemently object to the currently proposed FleXible Development at
115 North Keystone Dr for all of the reasons stated above If an alternative proposal
were to be made for a one~story, two-car garage on thiS property, I would have no
obJections Approval of the current proposal, however, would potentially signal an
alarming trend for our neighborhood, whIch I would be dismayed to witness I hope thiS
IS not what the City has In mind when It refers to partnenng With neighborhoods Thank
you for your consIderation In thiS matter
Regards,
rn ~ ~ Le ~~\~~~t~-W\\'
---~ - -'\ 1\ \
~~~
OEVElOPMEN r SeRVICES om
CITY OF CLS^f.!\!ATER
~ 6/.4J~
Gary D Plyler
cc BIll Home, City Manager, City of Clearwater
Frank Hibbard, Vice-Mayor, Clearwater City Councllmember
Joanna Siskin, President - Skycrest Neighborhood Assoclabon
2
. .' : 'fh.l~I\WiEfJ .
J"/,C "lit 'd :.'l YI\Ir'E>:l ""1'=1- t
,... ~ .... 'U ~""'~
- - ~ .... - -.- -~
,COMM DEV BOARD/ P~BLlC HEARING 10-19-04 REF FLD2004-06044
I,: . I! f1 '\
, Ii, " III rI
I "tl~AM A PROPERrrQY:{~E~ IN THE SKYCREST AREA AND HAVE LIVED IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD
'l 'IF.OR:AB"OUT 20 YEARS I u j,
- !.,,"'. .!ULlll;; G.
....- --..... ....
I AM, ALSO, A WALKER, WALKING THE NEIGHBORHOOD MANY TIMES & MANY SEASONS
ORIGlNAL
AT THIS TIME VIEWING THE DIFFERENCE IN HOMES AND ADDITIONS AND SAOL Y CODE
INFRACTIONS
My observation IS that the Cote's do keep their property In good repair
However ;THIS REQUEST FOR A 3 CAR GARAGE t\DD!TlON IS A BIT EXCESSIVE for !his rental
duplex. 115 keystone IS a income property-2J 1- bed 1/bath apt- appx 625ft each wI am pie parking
driveway provided. Current date there are single occupants in duplex using the driveways for
parking. Not side streets. True, Off the side parking occurs all through the Neighborhood.
Also I FEEL In creating this space WILL CREATE TEMPTATION TO STORE INVENTORY &
BUSINESS TRUCK, TRAILER AND EQUIPMENT FROM ANOTHER BUSINESS or FOR THE
PERSONAL USE of MR COTE. Or even may become a garage apartment.
Purpose use is for parking for duplex as presented & reviewed. 2004
QUESTIONS:
WHY NOT 3 SINGLES CAR Bays / Rather THAN A DOUBLE plus 1?
Why high pitch roof?? 2-story 22FT Peak and appx 900 sq ft usage. For rental use ??
ATTACHMENT to East Side of duplex/would take away SEVERAL wlndows& Alc Unit or severely restrict
the view on East Side How deSirable would that be to live In that apartment?
I have no problem w/2-car addltlonfw flattop roo1 to keep more In line wi the neighborhood and the site
portions Used for the purpose stated, Thank You fo ..'your attention In thiS matter
10//t
Elaine Hartman
1614 Cleveland St
Clearwater) FL 33755
;kin:
~~ r:v/~
P~(C7J~
fO)l [E rn ~ n W [E rm
UU\ OCT - 7 2D1J1i \lill
oevaOPMENT SERVICES DEFT
CITY OF ClEARWA1'ER
el" A.!l/lljr-
--'~ .J I " I \ i
...
S. NOEL WHITE AND JACK F. WHITE ill
105 NORTH KEYSTONE DRNE
CLEARWATER, FL 33755
ORIGINAL
October 14, 2004
CIty of Clearwater
Attention Wayne Wells
PlallJung Department
100 S Myrtle A venue
CleatVlater, FL 33756
Vla facsim.tle - 562-4865
RE DaVld A_ and Sharon A. Cote, 115 North Keystone Dnve, Clearwater, FL
FLD2004-Q6044
Dear Members of the Communrty Development Board.
We live at 105 North Keystone Drive, Clearwater, Flonda, and reCeIved notice of Mr. and Mrs. Cote's plan
to bUild a I Va story three car garage attached to the duplex at the above address We support the Board's
approval of the Flexible Development plan subm.ttted by the Cotes and request that the Board approve the
plan
The Keystone Manor SubdlVlSlon is a very dIverse conunumty unlike so many other SUbdiVISIOns m Pmellas
County. Within a 5 block radius you have many ffifferent sized lots whICh contam duplexes, smgle famdy
one-story and two story homes, mulh-fanuly hOUSIng, etc. There are homc:s that were built m thl:-1940's With
much newer homes built on the same block. The Cote's plan to build a. three car garage would ~eatly
improve the subJ eet property. The plan would not detract from the neighborhood and Will most likely result
1D mcreasmg the value of surroundmg properties. Several resIdents Wltlnn a 5 mile radiUS of the subject
property hav~ received permission to butld a three car garage and the Cote's plan would adequately tie the
new structure mto the eX15tmg duplex on the property
We know that some people have objected to the plan and have asserted that the Cote's would use the area
on top of the garage as addttional hvtng space. Fl1"St. this would be Impos~i1ble since the addItional space IS
only a V2 story. The area would be avaIlable to the tenants of the duplex for storage. A tlu'ee car garage IS
necessary so that the tenants of the property can park thelI vehtcles under cover leavmg sufficlImt spl;lce
available for the lawn equipment and other items (currently stored m a shed that 15 on the property) used to
mamtam the property The look of the propOSed garage would not be mCOllSIstent With other $1J'Uctw'es m
the neighborhood Slnce there are a number of structures m Keystone Manor that ~ve two full story garages
The Planning Department has carefully reviewed the plans subnutted by the Cotes and have recommended
that the Board approve the plan. We urge the Board to follow the staff's recommendatlon.
Smcercly.
ll~m ~6'~VW
Hl 39'Qd
9LEEi9ELLGL 1
09:Ei0 v006/91/01
~
,
-.---- 1
rn ~ @ ~o--\~-~~ro'\t
D Oc:\ \ \ 'U04t d It
sa> 1 n S- _J1l1
DEVROPMENT SERVICES om\
CITY 01"" 0 ~ >J ~~. ~T';"R ~ i
1550 Cleveland Street
Clearwater, FL 33755
October 7, 2004
Community Development Board,
Cyndl Tarapanl, Planning Director, and
Cynthia E Goudeau, CIty Clerk
City of Clearwater
PO Box 4748
Clearwater, FL 33758-4748
ORIG\NAL
Re: 115 North Keystone Drive,
Notice of Objection to Proposed Flexible Development
Dear Community Development Board, Planning Director & City Clerk,
Per the notice of City Public Hearing, I am wntlng to VOice my objection as an Interested
party to the proposed Flexible Development at 115 North Kevstone Drive, Keystone
Manor, Blk D, Lot 1 & 20, FLD 2004-06044 I have personally resided at 1550
Cleveland Street for over thirty-five years and currently own ten properties In the
Immediate Skycrest Neighborhood with eight residential dwellings Two of these
properties are located wrthln very close proximity to 115 North Keystone Dr
Subsequently, J feel that I have a tremendous vested Interest tn the neighborhood and
any such proposed developments
My pnmary objection to the Flexible Development IS that the proposed structure would
be overwhelming m size and height, not shielded from view of the street and out of
character with the surrounding neighborhood architecture My understanding of the
proposed construction IS for a two-story, three-car garage of 26' X 32' This Indicates
that a base square footage of 832 square feet for a garage will be attached to a dwelling
that IS a mere 1,152 square feet, representmg over 70% of the dwelling's base area
Furthermore, the proposed structure would nse to some 22 feet at ItS apex, dwarfing the
small dwelling to which It IS attached and standing out as one of the few structures In the
entire area that rises above one story Our Skycrest area IS a quamt, well-established
neighborhood Approval of this development would represent a complete departure from
the norm and would result In a structure completely out of character With the
neighborhood
It IS my understandmg that the pnmary purpose for the proposed two-story, three-car
garage IS to prOVide off street parking for reSidents of the two, one bedroom units located
on the property A cursory Inspection of the property on any given evening Will
demonstrate that reSidents currently park on a dnveway constructed for that purpose, so
very little, If any, on street parking currently occurs I would submit for the Board's
conSideration that the true dnvlng force for the proposed development IS a desire for
more storage capacity on the part of the owner
,
1
~
What baffles me as a homeowner, however, IS not so much the proposed development
of a structure that violates so many of our cIty standards, but the fact that the City of
Clearwater planning staff IS recommending approval of It In the Fall of 2002, I
approached the city staff wIth a proposal to bUild a one-story, two-car garage on an
entirely vacant lot attached to one of my residences well shielded from view of the street
wIth a fence and foliage My proposal was rejected out of hand Ultimately, I had to go
before the board to receIve a vanance to place a 12' X 24' portable garage on thiS
property ThiS Inoonslstency In the City Planmng Department's handling of resident
proposals IS dIsconcerting to say the least
In summary, l must vehemently object to the currently proposed FleXible Development at
115 North Keystone Dr for all of the reasons stated above If an alternative proposal
were to be made for a one-story, two-car garage on thIS property, I would have no
objections Approval of the current proposal, however, would potentially signal an
alarming trend for our neighborhood, which I would be dismayed to witness I hope thiS
IS not what the City has In mind when It refers to partnenng with neighborhoods Thank
you for your conSlderatton In thiS matter
Regards,
rn [E @ ~ "l~~~ ~-rn,il
OCI I I 2eo:-l I I
SEP 1 0 yma -.J '
DEVELOPMENTSERVlCES DEPTj
CI1Y OF_C! r-J\''WATs.R
~ 6J..a~
Gary D Plyler
cc BIll Home, City M~er, City 'Of Clearwater
Frank.. Hibbard; VI~Mayor, C~ater City Councllmember '
Joa_$sKtn~, Pfest(ient'_'"':.'~crest Neighborhood ASSociation
2