FLD2004-08059
CL W CoverSheet
FLD2004-08059
15 AVALON ST
Date Received: 08/26/2004
AMBIANCE ON WHITE SANDS
o
ZONING DISTRICT: MHDR
LAND USE: RH
ATLAS PAGE: 258A
PLANNER OF RECORD: WW
., ,
11-1.... I _ I ('. , l.lr._ ,~) ....\ l ~ l...l .................\ e1.}..... ~... ''''''~ .I~l 1\ 1 ~IY-l ~ _-I.... ...1 L "- ~ -\
. .
"
ORIGINAL
, "
\ ;
;'
}..
, '
, ,
'~~
U~
Planning Department
100 South Myrtle Avenue
ClealWater, Florrda 33756
Telephone 727-562-4567
Fax. 727-562-4865
CAS E #"
DATE RECEIVED
RECEIVED BY (staff Inlllals)
ATLAS PAGE #
ZONING DISTRICT
LAND USE CLASSIFICATION
SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT
PROPERTIES
NORTH
SOUTH
WEST
EAST
o SUBf\li,T ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
o SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF TH E ORIGI NAL APPLI CATION Includmg
1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of sIte plans
o SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $
)-
* NOTE 14 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED
(APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS)
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
Residential InfilI Pro] ect (RevIsed 2/02/2004)
....PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT-
--'
A APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT'INFORMATION (Code SectIon 4-202 A)
APPLICANT NAME -8 "t;""" "5LA 'f\ ~< , lei ()~m<?~, 1- I. -C'_ -
MAILING ADDRESS S,\ \ S, tT\1 f--\-\~. ~ 'let) ( /\ -.p !;I....n \....Utt-\) ~\ 33--,=j I C?
PHONE NUMBER 6:')..1') I-\"QL') - ') lJj FAX NUMBER L 1-:;)..1) 5q ~ - 3L\.J ~
PROPERTY QWNER{S) A-\ \c 1\ "l . C-\"Odt: p') I n,lf\\er:-1\eaf'.b-C_..ALAO;_
fb'r ~ -th rust Include ALL owners)
f{\\ , ..'-1(:.
AGENT NAME ~\0l;;I~ ~~_~~~~~ ~~\:~~~~ ~.
MAILING ADDRESS I~ \ €j ,(. ~:;.., '\" \.3 s
PHONE NUMBERLlJ--,') )L\:'J - ~~~ FAX NUMBER :J L - 0 0
CELL NUMBER [I J7 IOq-o
B
Ip
STREET ADDRESS
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
PARCEL NUMBER
PARCEL SIZE
PROPOSED USE{S) AND SIZE(S)
(number of dwelling umts, hotel roo
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S)
II
(Include all requested code deViations, e g reductIon In required nOmber ofppar1<lng's'pac&;,[!ip'etIDt<O/S~~/ln7
SEm/ICES
r:l rv n~ CLE \'''NA TEFl
"
ORIGINAL
\ DOE S THI S APPlI CATION I NVOL VE Tf-lE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RI GHTS JTJlR), A PREVI OUSL Y APPROVE D PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES L NO _ (If yes, attach a copy of the apphcable
dpcuments)
C
PROOF OF OWNERSHIP {Code Sectron 4-202 AS)
- .
a SUBMIT A COpy OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED OR AFFIDAVIT ATIESTING TO THE OWNERSHIP OF THE PROPERTY
o WRITTEN SUBMITTAL R.!;QUIREMENTS (Code Section 3R913.A)
- .
a Provide complete responses to the SIX (6) GENERAL APPLICABIliTY CRITERIA - Explaln!:!9.Y! each cnlena IS achIeved, In detail
The proposed development of the land Will be In harmony WIth the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties In which It
Is localed Se e..- CZ -* ~\ '01'4- ~, A- 1/
--"
2 The proposed development Will not hinder or dIscourage the appropnate development and use of adjacent land and bUIldings or slgnlflcantly
ImpaIr the value thereof ~ pe- Z-"'f. ,,) Dl+- I) A-' \
3 The proposed development WIll not adversely affect the health or safely or persons reSIding or working [n lhe neIghborhood of the proposed
use S L;- \ \.... '\ 11 un
~~ - .L Y-~1J\4: 4
4 The proposed development IS deSIgned to minimIZe trafflc congestion
:j(e -' L~ ~~IGA- I[ ~I
5 The proposed development Is consistent Wllh the community character of the Immediate VICInity of the parcel proposed for development
~C?~_ ~ ~\--,\t r\- 1\~lr
6 The deSign of the proposed development ml nlmlzes adverse effects, Including Visual, acoustIc and olfactory and hour.:; of operatIon Impacts,
on adjacent propertles~. 7~ \ 'L '\ l \ ill'
~p e..- ' L :::t-.. \\\1ll::t: +
OCT I 4 2004
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES
CITY OF CLEARWATER
~ - \~-
ORIGINAL
o
Prov,de complete responses to the seven (7) RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECT CRITERIA - ExplaIn how eaeh cnt~na IS achIeved, In detail
The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development IS othel'W1se Impractical wIthout devIations from the mtenslty and
development standards
5ee....-
L~h\o~' Pt-/l
2
The development of Ihe parcel proposed for development as a residential mfill project WIll not mat en ally reduce the faIr market value of
abuttl ng properties (I nclude the eXlstlllg value 01 the sIte and the proposed value of the sIte with the Improvements)
5 f \. h t+- II tf11(
_ f'F _ ..x V""'\l
--"'
3 The uses wlthtn the resldelltlallnfill project are otherwise permitted In the City of Clearwater
~F~_ 4\-<~\+-1\~(
4 The uses or mix of use within the residential tnfill project are compatible with adjacent land uses
5 pe t _""-~l h,+ !/~ /l
5 The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential mfill prOject Will upgrade the ImmedIate VICInity of the parcel
proposed for development jep _ ? ~'f. _~:~'I
6 The desIgn of the proposed residential Infill project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the ImmedIate
VlClnJty of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole
:Se~
&~~~t+l! A(
1
7 FleXibIlity In regard to lot Width, reqUIred sqtbacks, height and off-street parkmg are JustIfied by p
ImmedIate VICinIty of the parcel proposed for development and the CUy of Clearwater as a who!
PLANNING & DEVELOPMEN1
~I.:H\lIL,I.:::;
~
ORIGINAL
SU PPLEM ENTAL SUBMITTAL REQU IREM ENTS (Code Section 4-202 A)
o
SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (mcludlng legal descriptIon of property) - One anginal and 14 caples,
o
TREE SURVEY (lI1c1udmg eXlstlOg trees on site and Wlthm 25' of the adjacent Slle, by speCies, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location,
including drip lines Jnd Indlcatmg trees to be removed),
o
LOCATION MAP O'F THE PROPERTY,
o
PARKING DEMAND STUDY m conjunction with a request to make deviatIons to the parking standards (Ie Reduce number of spaces) Prior to
the submiltaJ of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Communtty Development Coordinator and shall be In
accordance wIth aecepted traffic engineering pnnclples The findings of Ihe study will be used In determining whether or not deViations to the
parkmg standards are approved,
o
GRADING PLAN, as applicable,
o
PRELIMINARY PLAT, as reqUIred (Note BUlldmg permits Will not be Issued untIl evidence of recordmg a final plat Is provIded),
o
COpy OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable,
F
SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS (Code Section 4-202.A)
o
SITE PLAN With the follOWing mformatlon (not to exceed 24" x 36")
All dimenSIons,
N orlh arrow,
Engmeenng bar scale (minImum scale one Inch equals 50 feel), and date prepared,
Location map,
Index sheet referencmg indIVidual sheets Included In package,
Footpnnt and size of all EXISTING bUIldings and structures,
Footpnnt and size of all PROPOSED bUlldlOgs and structures,
All reqUired setbacks,
All eXJstmg and proposed pOll1lS of access,
All required SIght tnangles,
IdentificatIOn of environmentally untQue areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen
trees, including deSCriptIon and locatIon of understory, ground cover vegetatIon and Wildlife habitats, etc,
Loeatlon of all publIC and private easements,
Locat!on of all street rights-of-way Within and adjacent to the SIte,
LocatIon of existIng public and private utilitIes, including fire hydrants, storm and santtary sewer Unes, manholes and 11ft stations, gas
and water lines,
All parkmg spaces, driveways, loadIng areas and vehicular use areas,
Deplcllon by shading or crosshatching of all reqUired parking lot Intenor landscaped areas,
Location of all solid waste eonlall1ers, recycling or trash handling areas and outSide mechanical equipment and all reqUired screening {per
SectIon 3-201 (0)(1) and Index #701},
location of all landscape matenal,
Location of all onslte and off site storm-water management facilities,
locatIon of all outdoor Ilghtll1g fixtures, and
Location of all eXisting and proposed Sidewalks
a
SITE DATA TABLE for eXistIng, required, and proposed development, In written/tabular form
land area In square feet and acres,
Number of EXISTING dwelling untts,
Number of PROPOSED dwelling unIts,
Gross floor area devoted to each use,
Parkmg spaces total number, presented In tabular form WIth the number of required spaces,
Total paved area, mcludmg all paved parking spaces and dnveways, expressed 111 square feet and percentage of the paved vehIcular area,
Size and species of atllandscape material,
Offielal records book and page numbers of all exlstmg utility easement,
BU11dmg and structure heights,
Impermeable surface ratIo (I S R j, and
Floor area ratIo (F A R ) for all nonresidential uses
a
REDUCE D SITE PLAN to scale (8 Yo. X 11) and color rendenng If pOSSIble,
o lE(clE~wlE
o
FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, proVide the followmg additional Information on Site plan
One-fool contours or spot e!evatlons on Site,
I Off site elevatIons If reqUired to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel,
All open space areas,
location of all earth or water retalrtmg walls and earth berms,
Lot hnes and bUlldmg lines (dimensIoned),
Streets and dnves {dImensIOned},
BUildIng and structural setbacks (dimensioned),
Structural overhangs,
Tree Inventory, prepared by a "eertlfied arbonsl", of all trees 8' DBH or greater, reflectmg Size, canopy (drip Imes) and condition of such trees
OCT I 4 2004
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENl
S ER\lICES
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Page 4 of 7 - Flexible Development ResJdentlallnfill Application - CIty of Clearwater
ORIGINAL
G
STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS (City of Clearwater Design Cfltefla Manual and
4~2D2_A 21)
o
STORMWATER PLAN including the following requIrements
EXisting topography extending 50 leet beyond all property lines,
Proposed grading including fWished fioor elevatIOns of all S'I uetures,
All adjacent streets and munIcipal storm systems,
Proposed stormwater de!enlion/retentlon area Including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure,
Stormwater calculatIons for attenuation and water quality,
Signature of Flonda registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations
o
COpy OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL
(SWFWMD approval IS required prior to Issuance of City Building Permit), If applicable
o
COpy OF STATE AND COUNTY STORMWATER SYSTEM TIE-IN PERMIT APPLICATIONS, If applicable
f fl
II I I I \
LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS (Section 4~1102 A) lni lS ~ lS U '
LANDSCAPE PLAN
All eXisting and proposed structures, ~ OCT I 4 2004
Names of abutting streets,
Drainage and retention areas Including swales, side slopes and bottom elevatIons,
Deltnealion and dimenSions of all required perimeter landscape buffers,
Sight VISibility tnangles, PLANNING e. C;:':VELOF'MEN1
De[1 neatlon and dimenSions of all parking areas including landscapl ng Islands and curbing, Sf: R VI C E S
Proposed and required parkmg spaces, GJ1V OF ClE,\qWATER
EXIsting trees on,slte and Immediately adjacent to the SIte, by speCIes, size and locatIons, Inc[udlng dnpllne,
Location, SIze, descnptlon, speCificatIons and quantIties of all eXlstlng and proposed landscape malsnals, Including botanical and
common names,
TypIcal planting detaIls for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including Illstructlons, SOil mixes, b<lckfillmg, mulchmg and
protecllve measures,
Intenor landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and Interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and
percentage covered,
CondlllOns of a prevIous development approval (e g conditions Imposed by the Communtty Development Board),
Irrigation notes
H
o
a
REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN 10 scale (8 Y:i X 11) (color rendering if pOSSIble),
IRRIGATION PLAN (reqUIred for level two and three approval),
o
o
COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM applicatIon, as applicable
BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS (Section 4-202 A 23)
Reqwred rn Ihe event the applrcatlon Includes a development where deSIgn standards are In Issue (e g Tourist and Downtown' Dlstncts) or as
part of a ComprehenSive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Resldentlallnflll Project
o
BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all Sides of all bUildings Includmg height dimenSions, colors and materIals,
o
REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four Sides of bUIlding WIth colors and matenals to scale (8 Y:i X 11) (black and white and color
rendering, If pOSSIble) as reqUired
J
SIGNAGE (DIVISIOn 19 SIGNS I Section 3-1806)
o
All EXISTING freestandmg and attaclled sIgns, ProVIde photographs and dimenSIons (area, height, etc ), Indicate whether they will be
removed or to remain
o
o
o
All PROPOSED freestandmg and attached sIgns, Provide details Including location, Size, height, colors, matenals and drawlllg
I
ComprehenSive SIgn Program applicatIon, as applIcable (separate applicatIon and fee reqUIred)
Reduced slgnage proposal (8 y, X 11) (color), If submlttfng ComprehenSive Sign Program applicatIon
Page 5 of 7 - FleXible Development ReSldenllaJ Infil! Applicat!on - City of ClealWater
1..\ \
,l104
o ,
ORIGINAL
r-
TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY (SectIOn 4-801 C)
o
Include as required If proposed development will degrade the acceptable level of servIce for any roadway as adopted In the Comprehf'n~ave
Plan Trtp generation shall be based on the most recent edltldn of the Institute of Transportalion Engineers Trip General Manual Refer to
Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for excep\!ons to this requirement
L
SIGNATURE
...-tt~f;:~-~ DEBRA ANN HARRIS
~. ~;.*~ MY COMMISSION # DD 233928
~~.. tl EXPIRES August 152007 '
'/If,.fll'' Banded Thro Nota '
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS ~ , ~
worn to and subscnbed beforMe thIs a!,!::f..- .,day of
, A D 20 L to me and/or by
· -t> who s pers~y k~~
as
I, the underSigned, acknowledge that all representatIons made In thIs
appllcalion are (rue and accurate to the best of my knowledge and
authorize C y representatives to VISit and photograph the properly
descrt ed In thIs application
1)( ~7
s
OCT I 4 2004
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENl
SEIWICES
CITY or CLEr\q'NATEq
0...............,. a "..t- "7 r;la.....tnID nOl fO I..... nnrl.on" l:ji1o~'nQnh"'=tj Il"lfill ^ ........I,...~+I.....~ ""'Ih j .....1 f""1Q.C1r'\&/o:=-lor"
~ .
1 ~ ~ \ At. \ \ "'... ,,-,....:. \ \
08/24/2004 14 59 72756
~OI44/L~~q 14,Li I~I
5
d035
ENG
NORTHSIDL ENG ::>'IICS
PAGE
PACE
01/01
02/ El3
K
TRAF=FIC IMPACT STUDY. (Section 4n801 C) .
1141,~ j;..r<t J-fu<(j IS lid ~ ~f,/Je f4l~ tIYJ/J'IJ/Kt~ ~41 Mj etc<<J C!lr -I/1f6k#~
InGlud/~$ requln;:d if prOPolled dBvelopmsflt will degrade the acoeptable Il'lval of SGI"IIJe.e ror any /QadwllY as adopl9clln the CQmple~n""$l\le
plan Trip genQretJOn shall be based 011 Ihe rr10$t recent ~ej,tjon Qf tMe Illslill,lle of TIt!l1apoltItlon !:Ilglnsllr'e rrlp Gijnere) Mi;lf1l,lSI R9'll!'f to
Secllan 4-801 C of l/'Ie Communlly Development Code for excBp(lons !o thlsl'elQulretllenl
x
SIGNATURE'
L..___
r -
I tile underslgnlold ac!mowledge 1tUI! all ~presentatlons mad!!! In this
e.pphOSllon are INe and aCCijrale to \11$ best of my knowladgG and
author1.:ta C reprrosenlatlves to viSIt and photograph tile ProPfll1y
descrl el1l Ihm applI!'!lllon
STATE OF nORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLM. f..J:!i.:2-
worn to <lId ~ul:J9cnbed before ~ e thiS. ,..,l (., _ day of
L::.., ....... A 0 20(2 to me--1l~y
-o.~, ~who S pers~~
rodIJced as
idenllficll.llon
=q-
('1 ;ltV7
FB~ ""
76/1 Date II ~ 01
pages ..
,1~ From
\~~ Co
Phone #
~'~0Jb Fax u
Posl~it~ Fax Nol",
To ~ 'B~}
Co IDepl rvOt~\.'~
Phone #
ORIGINAL
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
S ER\lICES
CI fl' OF CLE.-\RWATER
Page 6 of l' - FleXible Developl\1e!'ll R.~sldenllBllnIIll ApplloatJo _ CII)! of CI(larwalef
lZl24/2003 00 40 FAX
eB/23/2a04 e8.q~ l~fq~OOU
IiI002
ORIGINAL
LETTER OF AUTHORIZA lION
ThiS letter wi;: serve BS authorizatIon for Housh Ghovaee wIth Nortbside
Engineering Services, Inc. to act as an agent for l.c.-mt r ~{o..r: V\ Uv...Io, (LC...
and to execute any and all documents related to securing permits
and approvals for the construction on the property generally located at
/ ~5 fj ~ eft, ct~~ ~IYln9 wlttun
'/) , "
It h.etlfiVJ F ~~
C ~rc....\ a,. W~'b";.J 1
"pnnt Nam~.Qf--proPJ\rtv..nwper, k. f' \
G \..>..J '{-..Q '" J f-i ,e "~i d~ t.... ~ /.-C,,~r (~.eac. " '--7t.J
LLC-
SIgrfa1ure of Pr arty Owna.
/ 5 A~~ ,-~t-
Address of Property Owner
O!U;:UAAJLhU!i'.~ ~t'"' S 316 '1
City/State/Zip Code
Telephone Number
~l^llr
State of CtrCP- '1: _ )
county of 1 ~ r 1-( '1'::>,
The foregoing Instrument was acknoWledge before me thlt!5.r. , day
/jJ -1- 'J.cof It' r I < f
of ~.!/dL.Jl~, by I f C it '0 ~ ,as e. Sf /
.t'7 ,j /it r 1\
who Is pIllIonlfly known to me Dr 0 hes produced _0 Ut'"I E}~r<;, ,{( c,Ett5e
as Identification and who did (did not) take In oath
2
//; ;?~l-
(Signature)
CommIssion # 7 /7...--1 /) c:;
,
/)
~~!:
r A7-
_ Notary Public
(SEAL ABOVE)
fie Ie 11 e: (;J 't (Name 0' NotalV Typed, Pnnted or Stamped)
, r
.-.,,"'$'_#....
I HELEN R. COX
NOTARY PUBLIC
__J'TATE OF COLORADO
.... My CommIssion ExpJres 7/212005
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES
CITY OF CLEARWATER
08/2J/2004 08 49
727446P'
NORTHSIDE ENG 7 -
PAGE 03/03
ORIGINAL
LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION
ThIS letter WI;: serve as authorization for Housh Ghovaee wIth Nortbside
Engineenng Services, Inc. ta act as an agent for A / /a. ;~I X Cro al1ev-
and to execute any and all documents related to securing permIts
and approvals for the construction on the property generally located at
/ f:v Kel1cfa If Siree-t, Ckil1.t/ll.e- l5e:tLl1 ,lYIng withIn
,
J '
/ I ,1~ l!crS County, State of F lOt (a)"l
--~
,~~,~~;/
I f..; /,.J.(~,)..r..6:;_f~Lr
Address ~of Property Owner
i!gi.X_u'>-I<':J?__ :;; / ~ 3 7 b '7
CitY/State/ZIp Code
.A.l1 a jI\ J LYVoI< er
Print Name of Property Owner
7.;; 7 ~ lj L! f-- -7,/0& E",r..1-- (
Telephone Number
State of F Lu~ I jQ~'r-
County of fJ/ IV r.:: LL-1-5
The foregoing Instrument was acknowledge before me this .;J '-Ilk-; day
of b~ . ,?~tbY Al/'hl -;:). Grvo ~v' , as
who IS persona fly knoWl1 to me or who has produced
.
as Identltlcatlon and who dId (did not) take an oath
, ;;;'Y'fi" RICHARD I KANTNER, JR
/!"'A I<i(~.", MY COMMISSION ~ DO 073848
~ ~,",j EXPIRES February 9,2006
1},.p'~ ,ro'!- " 80",,'" T11rIJ Notary Public Und,,,,,am
-'
'-]wJ / t~J-
Ignature) { U
Commission #
~ Notary Public
(SEAL ABOVE~
(Name of Notary Typed, Pnnted or stamped)
OCT I 4 2004
~
D
--
o ~~~~W~
PLANNING & OEVELOPMENl
SEnVICES
CIT'r' OF ClENl\NATEI1
OR\G\NAL
u ~lC~~w~ 0 l
OCT I 4 2004 !
\
LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION
pi r\"JNI~"JG & riV[l.oPMENl
S 1':1-:; vlCFS
- -, ~' r~ (: -4 ,oF, I Eq
This letter will serve as aulhonzation for Housh Ghovaee with Nortbside EDg1ueenng
ServIces, Ine , to act as an agent for MeSmlth, Inc" and to execute any and all documents
related to secunng pennits and approvals for the construction on the property generally
located <It 17 Avalon Street, lymg WIthin Clearwater, PlUcl1as County, State ofFlonda. ~
Signature of Property Owner
D. Lanee Wilson, PresIdent
MeSmlth. Ine
Pnnt N~e of Property Owner
Clearwater. Florida 33767
Oty/State/Zip Code
1 7 Avalon Street
Address of Property Owner
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
o O~.L,
The foregoinvnstrument was acknowledged before me thlS J ' day of August, 2004 by.P: lV,' Ls "^
LaBG&--Wtlson-<iS1>re~nt pI McSmitb, Inc., wbo is personally known to me or wbo bas
produced ~-....rv~ k1/v..r""....,.. as identificatIon and who did/did not take an oath-
-, _ I)Il ~ 0a Lloc~
.::i.< J t -H',J- tk s':' d ~D Clsh G- h · Ii<..n
'1\S ~c~ ~ ~ +n ~ ~6 1~~+~~W~)
l-v ' j...f> ~ ^ -'11 ~ ({yf -ft IJ'YVT -
(V~ ~e\ w) '1 I ~ ,~~ I 4.1.-t- <fr'- ~ ~,-w ~ .
Jv,-c-'I ~ ~6 tv'" ~~~ ~ ~
/...~ )yV]Jt 1 :~~ClALNOrAAYSfAL
~' J,....y) 0"1"\ -r, 0", (. MARIEGAUANT
{j"\! . . ~ ~~. .-err (l
)i ("! " rf ~ ~ \~ Jf. :: r..oMt.lISSIQN NUMBER
1 ~ C ~l V' ) "... W ~ CC970426
\l. ~ 0 0'<' MV COMMISSION EXPIRES
ff\. .~...2S.T 242004
QC 1-./ fOl7n..l 1110-1
OfU-Jtt-I' J
tlll~ J~V'I~ t~~~~'I~-WOJ./
I' , I IIn_t'_an
(REVISED)
I
Exhibit U A " to Flexible Development Application (Residen tiallnfill Plf.,ojec,t}_; & 0 leV Ie LO f::>~.1 E N1
SERviCES
ClfY or- CLE"QV/AT[11
Ambiance on White Sands
NES'iProject #0441
Description of Request(s):
ORIGINAL
To demolish eXisting 15 unit overnight accommodations and single-family residential use
and to request (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (15 overnIght
accommodations umts to be converted to 11 dwellIng units), under the provisIons of
Section 6-109; (2) FleXible Development approval to permit a total of 13 attached
dwellmgs in the Medium HIgh DensIty Residential (MHDR) District and Tourist (T)
District with reductIOns to lot area m the :MHDR DIstrict from 15.000 square feet to
8,700 square feet and in the T District from 10,000 square feet to 4,350 square feet,
reductions to lot width in the MHDR DIStrIct from 150' to 100' and the T District from
100' to 50', reductions to the front (north along Avalon Street - :MHDR) setback from
25' to 10' (to buildmg) and from 25' to 0' (to dumpster stagmg pad), a reductIOn to the
side ~Mfest-MHDR DIStrICt) from 10' to 0' (to butldmg), a reduction to the rear (south-
MHD:R) from 15' to 10' (to bUIldmg), a reductIOn to the front (south along Kendall- T
District) from 15' to 10' (to bUIldIng), a reduction to the sIde (west - T District) from 10'
to 0' (to bmlding), an increase in height m the MHDR District from 30' and in the T
Distnct from 35' to 69.5' (to highest roof deck) WIth penmeter parapets of 3 67' (from
roof deck) and decorattve roof structures of 10.1' (from roof deck) and to permit a
bUIldmg WIthm the viSIbIlity tnangles as a ReSIdential Infill Project in the MHDR DIstrIct
and as a Comprehensive lnfill Redevelopment Project In the Tounst Dlstnct; (3) a
I
reductIon to the front perImeter buffer along Avalon Street in the MHDR DIStrict from
10' to 0' (to dumpster stagmg pad), a reduction to the SIde (west) landscape buffer in the
MHDR District from 10' to 0' (to buildmg) as a ComprehensIVe Landscape Plan and, (4)
the Transfer of Development Rights of one dwellIng umt to this site from 321 Coronado
Dnve
*See enclosed letter from Lisa L. Fierce, Assistant Planmng DIrector, City of Clearwater,
dated 'i\Ugust 3,2004 as to the calculations used for determining the allowable number of
units for development through the Termination of Status of Nonconformity process
No slgnage is proposed at this time
Written Submittal Requirements:
1. The proposed development will be m hannony with the surroWldmg area and
other eXisting and proposed residential uses The subject SIte is located Within
the Old Flonda District of Beach By DeSIgn which anticipates low to mid-nse
development Although the proposed project exceeds the maximum height
limitation, a similar heIght was approved not that long ago for a project by the
name of Lanssa whIch proposed 69.5' to the htghest roof deck. The proposed
6.1:
JRIGINAL
2!
'I
varymg heIghts for the subject project are as follows 54.5% of the roof deck
will be at 69.5' , 24% of the roof deck will be at 58 6', 11.5% of the roof deck
will be at 39 2'; and 10% of the roof deck wtll be at 29 6' An addItIOnal
3 67' of height IS being requested from roof decks to the tops of the parapets
to conceal rooftop au conditioning equipment. These varymg levels of
heights together wIth the proposed parapet heIght will lend towards creatmg a
balanced appearance for the proposed Mediterranean desIgn. Other projects
sImilar to the proposed height and setbacks were approved In the same
VICinity under the names of Chalets on White Sands and Chateaus on White
Sands. Zero setbacks to pavement eXIst on the adjacent City owned parking
lot to the west Directly across the Avalon right-of-way IS another CIty owned
public parkmg lot It is the applicant's intent to work WIth City Staff on a
wntten agreement which would hold the applicant not only to landscape the
parklllg lot across Avalon but would also require the applicant to maintam the
landscaping for a period of 10 years.
The proposed development WIll only entice appropriate development of
surrounding properties and will serve as an lllcentive for either re-
development of other nearby SItes or upgrades to current uses and will not
adversely Impact the surrounding property values
As the proposal is for a residentIal use, the health and safety of persons in the
neIghborhood will not be adversely affected. Although part of the request IS
to allow buildmgs WIthin the nght-of-way, vIsibIhty of oncoming vehicles and
pedestrians wtll not be Impacted Great effort has been made by the project
architect to come up with solutIOns to lessen the amount of the buildmg wIthm
the visibility trIangles Starrwells have been redeSIgned to allevIate mtrusIOn
lllto the viSIbility triangles and four hour rated glass IS proposed to be placed
in areas of the walls leading into the garage whIch are WIthin the VISIOn
tnangles. These glass areas WIll allow for addItional visibilIty of oncommg
traffic and/or pedestnans wIthtn the nghts-of-way Ifnecessary, mIrrors shall
be placed appropnately on the building itself to provIde additional VIsibIlIty
for both vehicles eXIting the parking garage and vehicles and pedestrians
utihzmg the adjacent nghts-of-way. Additionally, the applIcant would be
willing to pennanently paint words of cautIon on the right-of-way pavement
Itself, alerting drivers to '.Use Caution: VehIcles Entering Roadway". All
required parkIng will be provIded on SIte in heu ofwIthm the rIght-of-way.
On-site retentIOn WIll be prOVIded on site where none eXIsts now
The proposal mmimIzes traffic congestion by proVIdmg over and above the
required parkmg on SIte, observation of VIsibIlity trIangles and the desired
depth from the back of SIdewalk to the gate leading into the parkmg garage
The proposal is consistent WIth the commumty character of the Old Florida
District as great effort has gone into the attractIve MedIterranean deSIgn so
that Beach By Design concepts are enjoyed.
No adverse effects to adjacent properties are antiCIpated as thIs IS a residential
use No commerCIal uses are being proposed for thIs-Sl!e-so nOl~0lfflet0ry
and hours of operallon impacts are not an Issue. c5) IE ~ IE ~ w IE
,
fU OCT I 4 2004
'I
'I
3;
11
4"
11
5
'" '~Nt,IING B, D;::VELOPMENI
S EI1\/ICES
. '
OR,JINAL
Residential Jofill Project Criteria
I
The subject site is desirable for redevelopment due to its close pfu'fi~~~el~~~lOPMENT
the beach and beach related amemtIes. However, adjacent properti~~~QtEAAWATER
aVailable for purchase therefore leaVIng a very Irregularly shaped parcel on
which to develop a illgh quality residentIal project The applicant is
requesting to termInate the Status ofNon-confornuty of the site and to transfer
one urnt of denSity to the site for a total of 13 units The 20% lImitation for
transferring density to the site will not be exceeded and IS not even beIng
requested If the applicant deSIred to request an additional unit to be
constructed on site the TDR section of the Commumty Development Code
would allow the request however the applIcant IS not pursumg that option. In
order to make the project financially viable, the request for the 13 umts, at the
size being proposed is necessary The need to provide on-site parlang (20
spaces are reqUIred and 24 are being proposed) IS dnving the requested
reductions to setbacks and increase in height. The proposed heIght WIll also
allow the scale of the bwlding to be in concert WIth the desired Medtterranean
deSign and allows for all required parking to be provided on site.
Per the Pinellas County Property AppraIser the existIng just market value of
subject site IS $1,476,40000 WIth the proposed improvements to the site, the
estimated value upon completIOn would be $13,000.000.00 Tills type of
potential increase to the subject site's property value can only work towards
increasmg the value of surrounding properties
Attached dwellIngs are penmtted uses within both the Tounst and MHDR
zoning district and WIthin the City of Clearwater.
The proposed residential use is compatible with other surrounding and
adjacent land uses
The proposed nnprovements to the SIte inclUSIve of a high-quality reSidentIal
project WIth on-site retentIOn, parking and landscapmg will be sIgruficant for
not only the site but the surroundmg area as well. Vines will be planted in
permanent planters on the western side of the buildmg along the top of the 2nd
level (above garage and along terraces) which will grow downward along the
garage wall creating a soft buffer between the subject site and the adjacent
City owned publIc parking lot which currently mamtains a zero setback to
pavement/sidewalk. These improvements will be a much needed breath of
fresh air for the surroundlllg beach community.
The deSign of the project will bring parkmg onto the site in heu of within the
nght-of-way, will provide on-site retention where none eXists at this time and
WIll provIde areas of tropicallandscapmg where little to none exists
Flexibility III regard to reqUIred setbacks and increased heIght are justIfied by
the benefits provided to the surrounding conununity. The immediate
neIghborhood and users of the City owned public parlang lots and beach areas
will enJoy the redevelopment of the site from a predommantly overmght
accommodatIOn use into an attractive owner occupIed high-end reSIdential
project with secured on-site parkmg. The flexibIhty m regards to reduced lot
area IS justIfied by the fact that additional land IS unavaIlable adjacent to the
2
3.
4.
5
6.
7,1
ORIGINAL
subject site. The zero setback to bUlldmg IS created due to the required drive
aisle width wluch would be required by the CIty Code no matter how many
units were bemg proposed It IS more deSirable to provide the proposed 10'
setback to buildmg on the eastern sides of the project because of the adjacent
residentIal uses However, on the western SIde of the SIte IS an eXIstmg City
owned public parktng lot for use by "beach goers" wluch m no way can be
adversely Impacted by the requested zero setback to buildmg The proposed
Medtterranean style condominnun project inclusive oithe proposed vines
wluch will grow along the western wall of the entire 1 st and 2nd level of the
parking garage portion WIll be a significant aesthetic IDlprovement for users of
the publIc parkmg lot and for VISItorS to Clearwater Beach.
Termination of Status as a Non-Conformity Criteria (SectIOn 6-109C)'
1 The requITed buffer of 10' along the eastern SIde of the Site IS bemg met,
2 The proposed on-site parking withm an enclosed garage ehmmates the
eXlsting open parking conditIOns;
3 Any and all existing on-site signage will be removed No new sIgnage IS
proposed at thts tIme. If sIgnage is deSIred later on, it wIll be designed to meet
code reqUIrements and WIll be presented to CIty Staff for review,
4 A Comprehensive Landscape Program applIcatIOn has been submitted as part
of this project
Pu\NNING & DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES
CiTY OF CLEARWATER
>-
Planning and Development ServIces
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florrda 33756
Telephone 727-562-4567
Fax 727-562-4576
cpr::.r:;: #:
o ~ECEIVED
RCI,..c:.!VED BY (staff 100tials).
ATLAS PAGE #.
ZONING DISTRICT.
LAIIID USE CLASSIFICATION.
...\
,
o
o
SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED ANn NOTARl7Fn APPLICATION
ZONING & LAND USE CLASSIFICATION OF
ADJACENT PROPERTIES.
NORTH I
SOUTH' ,
WEST' I
EAST ,
o
SUBMIT 1 COPY OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION lncludmg folded site plan
OR\G\NAL
CO:MPREHENSlVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM REQum.E:MENTS
(ReVJsw. 9119(2001)
MAILING ADDRESS
FAX NUMBER:
p
a
(j{+) ') +~& -0"0 '!)(,.,'
.I
/
AGENT NAME {Contact Perso
PHONE NUMBER'
The landscapmg r~quirements of Article 3 Division 12 may be waived or modified as a part of a Level One or
Level Two Approval, as the case may be, if the application for development approval includes a ComprehenSIve
Landscape Program, which satisfies the following Crlterla. The use of landscape plans; sections/elevations,
rendermgs and perspectives may be necessary as supplementary mformation in addition to the Information
proVIded on thIS worksheet'
"
1 Architectural Theme
a The lanDscaping In a ComprehenSIve Landscape Program shall be designed as a part of the architectural
theme of the pnnclpal bulldmgs proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for the development
~:br+ It I(
NOV - 8 2004
PU\NNING & r,EVELOPMENl
~=D\fIC~C
~J;e of J
CITY OF ClE,iRWATER
2
3
OR
\ ,
b
The q,e5lgn, character, locatIon and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed m the ComprehensIVe
Landscape Program shan be demonstrably more attractIVe than landscaping otherwIse permitted on the parcel
proposed for development under the minImum landscape standards,
II
5e-t'- L-)c\'L~rt- q tr(
Llght!ng 'Any lightmg proposed as a part of a ComprehensIVe Landscape Program IS automatically controlled so
that the lrghtlng IS turned off when the busmess IS closed. ,
" ~ &\ k 'J:: .t {\ t t
': --....) e z ... Y''Il J I If
I ---"
Commumty Character The landscape treatment proposed In the Comprehensive Landscape Program will
enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater
II
~~ - ~y-\""b+ 1\ (-fl
~ g)[E(CE~~~~ Ill):
I I i I NOli - 82004 It./ i
J ".1 ~
L_____
PI Al\jr~' jG F, r - '":10'"/,\CNl
<:: E r' /:rr~ S
CITY OF CLE"I-iWf,T[q
ORIGINAL
p,!(,'S 2. Jr3
4,
Property yalues The landsca
beneficlallmp~ct on the value of t,
II
'''eatment proposed In the ComprehenslVI"
,;roperty In the Immediate VICinIty of the p..
"ndscape Program will have a
I proposed for development
"5e---e-
C-X h bc~ u At'
,
5
II
SpeCIal Ar~a or Scenic COrridor Plan The landscape treatment proposed In the ComprehenSive Landscape
Program IS consIstent wIth any speCial area or scenIc cOrridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and
adopted for the area In whIch the parcel proposed for development IS located
I: 5~~ 4\~\:Jlt~LA-tl
II
II
II
Please return CheC~hst for revIew and venticabon II
,I ! '
I
6 Th" ('lwe), ~e ""fe,,,g,oo '"~""ty, he,eby oem" ~,t the foregomg " lrut:" oo~~
. ~wm Plt"""4-
property Owner
STATE OF FLORIDA,
COl'NTY OF PINELLAS
I'
II
h Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commIssIoned by the laws of the State of Florida, ""
I d J<. ~
; on thl'j" ~ ~L-!....
[ClLJ C 0)() ~I personaUyappeared u,J..IJ ,,,?,t.;I))')IZ-;/_ who havmg been first duly sworn
I f" -
'-Deposes and says thai he/she ~IlY understands the contents of the affidav3t tha a/the signed_ .;1" "
My CommissIOn ExPlres:UI1+ /e/ ~O(P / ~L( (I ( -4 /A \:{t(~C
,I ~ "U Notary Public
day of
~\J.y "If",
....lM"'1; DOREEN A WILLIAMS
<:;;.;9# MY COMMISSION # 00155802
Offl.~ EXPIRES October 14 2006
1-8C0-3-NOT AF!Y Fl. NOl~~ S '
-, ""'00 1\ Bondlng Ine; I
I
S 'pp""t,on t'nn'ld~vetopment ",,,ffl k~liv~~~~~o~m\'~lt~\~n doc
ll' ----., I
"''"', f " \ ' :
\ ;1 -", I, \ WlV - B 20Q~ ' ,
I 1 I n-"'
\ I
I L----- - ----- -
~ r f'- ......,ns. ~ - r
Pl/,~'
OR\G\NAL
Page, of lr)
CITY Or- U_L ,-, "I, I L
'I
Revised Exhibit " A" to Comprehensive Landscape Program Application
I
II
Ambiance on White Sands
NES ,rroject #0441
1. Architectural Theme
a The Irregulanty of the subject lot and necessary buildmg size limIt the amount
of available area for landscaping, however, the proposed landscapmg will be
grande in appearance and in harmony WIth the Mediterranean bwlding design.
Proposed plantings include but are not limited to Tabebuia (Gold trees), Sabal
Palms, Royal Palms and Indian Hawthorne The combinatIOns of proposed
landscape materials wIll make a statement for thIS currently blase property and
will be a sigmficant unprovement for the adjacent properties and surrounding
area AddItionally, due to the zero setbacks being requested on the west side
of the buildmg and In keeprng With the Mediterranean feel, Creeping fig vmes
WIll be planted In pennanent planters on top of the 2nd level (above the garage
and along terraces) These vines Will cascade downward along the garage
wall facrng the City owned publIc parking lot.
,
b ,; The area being landscaped along the eastern SIde of the site wIll provIde a
welcome buffer for the adjacent propertIes, wlule the lack of area for
landscapmg on the west Will not be an adverse Impact to the adjacent open
public parking lot. The proposed vines which will cover the west wall (I st 2
levels) will soften the bUlldrng's appearance on the beach SIde of the property
The proposed bwldmg deSign alone WlIl be a welcome aesthetIC Improvement
for users of the publIc lot
,
,
2.11 Lighting
3.
r ----~-___
Ql
-~-l w' IT
~ "'=t ;s- ~
I:::::::::.: c:> 0 "'/
S:J ~ -', ,~ ;;;
c;::::::: ~.... ll. U'
, ~ ~ I L ~' _1
I {,' ,Y I')
~~ ~ J~' ~ 'It
[UlJl ___ ___ { '~, :
,(f'>:'-:=. c jl
L. _--.J: ~---a
No landscape hghting is proposed at tlus time. Lighting Will conSist of
fixtures attached to the proposed buildmg and will not spill onto adjacent
Sites
Community Character
The proposed landscapmg will be a significant Improvement for the site and
surroundmg area
Property Values
The proposed landscapmg will be a significant Improvement to the subject SIte
and surrounding property values when m concert with the proposed lugh-end
reSidential condomimum buIldmg. Currently the Property AppraIser lIsts the
Just market value of the subject SItes at $1,476,400.00 Upon completion of
ORIGINAL
-...
./
all Improvements Including the new condomInium bUlldmg, on-site retentIOn
and landscapIng, It IS estimated the value of the site wIll be $13,000,000 00
5. Special Area
The subject site lies WIthIn the "Old Flonda DIStrIct" of Beach by DesIgn
Beach by DesIgn contemplates landscapIng that will set Clearwater Beach
apart from other mumcIpalItIes Not only are the proposed landscape
matenals drought and salt tolerant but they WIll also enhance the proposed
lugh-end condorrumum project creatIng a trOpICal and grande MedIterranean
appearance for tlus site and surroundIng area
ORIGINAL
f~\ ~~~~W~ rn '
iJ [Ii NQV - 82004 J])
I
I
I
L
PLA!\,N " -; p. r ~\ 'l:"lOP
, MENT
SER/ICr:S
CJ ry OF ClE ,:=JWATEq
08-10-04 Og,'&im
frcm-JaHNSaN,POt~ ~A
~002
7,74416617 T-466 ~ 02/03 F-6~O
ORIGINAL
CITY OF CLEARWATER
12/25/200J 01 19 FAX
~
~
.--""#',
,Ilet,';:, PI. I 01 rill #'......
.~~ ~",r.nl,..~k'!'
....r-... ~."t "''''"- ~.,;,.""
,"i:s.l"IJ,~\. Q~
..~~-' \ ~'...c"
-. ~ ........
. ~ - ,....,...
;.~~ ,,'l~l
..:rlP,-m""~~'
................~THt, ,I"
.'.1.;:11 ,.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
1'l)'1 OJll'lCll Box 47413, Cl.IWlW...,liJI, FLOl\lO'" 33758-4748
MUNICIPAl SI RVl(.[$ BlIlI.D\NC, 10U SOlflH MYR11.EAvENUf', C1I1ARWAteu, Fl.oRlDA 33756
ThLEPHONl: (127) 552>4567 FAA (727) ;62 4576
1.Ol'I[, RA."G~ Pi.... '1N1NC,
D~Vfl0PM~J RFVlN'
Timothy A Johnson, Jr
Johnspo, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel &. Bum$. LLP
911 Chestnut Street
Post Office Box 1368
Clearwater, FL 33757-1368
l:l31\t'M 1:::>';:10 All:::>
S3:JIN:l3S
LN31Nd013i\30 'i? 8NINNIfld
Dear 'Mr Johnson
,0
1'--
tore V I 130 RJ1
3l~~3J~31(~~ \\,
-'
Re 16 Kendall Street and 15-17 Avalon Street
The property at 15 Avalon Street IS 2.On.ed Medium High Density Residential (MlIDR) Dlstnct
and is conSIstent With its underlying luLd use designauon of Residentl81 :High (RH) CategOI)'
This property IS currently developed, btLSW on records on file with the City, wlth a tiNe-unit
overnight accommodation use Based on the size of the property and the permitted density under
the RH land use category of30 utUts per acre for dweUinw" a maximum of two units 15 pemlltted
on this property Additionally, while aI\ overnight accommodation use IS listed as a pemlltted
FleXible Standard Development use in the :MHDIl Durtrlc1.. the eritena for ovenught
acco'~modatton uses require it to be accessory to the pnnc,ipal use as a pnvate residence Based
on the character of the existing use, 1he existing development does not comply with these
cntena As such, it IS the deteml1uaUon of the Planmng Depanment that the eXlstmg
development is a nonconformmg use and is also noneonfllmung to density ThlS detenmnatJ.on
does not include any determination as to other aspects of potentHtl noncooforrOlty. such as
setbac.k or parking requuements,
The property at 17 Avalon Street is ~C)f!ed Medium High Density ReSidential (MHDR) DIstrict
and IllS conSistent With Its underlymg land use deSignation of Residential H\gh (RH) Category
Thts property is currently developed WIth one detached (!>Ingle family) dwelhng Based on the
SIze of the property and the pernutted densIty under the lUlland use category of 3D um!$ per acre
for dwelhngs, a maximum of two units IS permitted on thiS property. The lot area does not
I .
comply wrth Code requIrements for detached dwelhngs and. IS therefore deemed nonconfornung
J
The propeny at 10 Kendall Street IS primarily zoned 'tounst (T) District (south 87 feet) and IS
consistent with its underlymg land use designation of Resort Facihnes High (llFH) Category
The northero 23 5 feet of this propertY IS zoned Medium High Density Residential (MIIDR)
D1stnct, WhiCh IS conslstent With its underlying land use designation of ReSIdential High (RH)
Category Tws property I:' currently developed, based on records on file With the City, With a
BXlJ.rl J AUl<(.l.n, Mhl'(lX luM'1"'lONCI{
IloYl HN-lllll1"', v\( I' MAVOK-CnMMI"tO"'I't\ W"I rNll'( GMT, ('O\\'III~'1ln~~K
I Ml<K 1l111l!.\IUI, ll!IAIAI",IONHt * Bill )ON,ON, luw.u"I()~11l
'EQUIII to Ml1 OYMPN I ^l<0 AF1'lHMA Ill', j\G 1101'1 E,\lJ'1 O't1'R"
.
'09~\O.04 Oe'Zearn from~JOHNSON,PO,. (A
7274419617
@003
T.469 P 03/03 F-530
12/25/2003 01 20 FAX
"...-
August 3,2004
Tim Johnson - Page 2
ORIGINAL
ten-\mlt overnIght aoeommodatlon use Based on the she of the propeny and the pennltted
densIty under the RFH land use category of 40 rooms per acre for overrnght accommodatlon uses
and under rhe RH land use category of 30 uruts per aOft: for dwellings, a maxunum of three
ov~mlG:ht accommodatIon Units IS perrmtted on thiS property As such. It IS the deterrmnation of
the Planrong Department that the eXlstmg development IS nonconfotml11g to densIty, TIus
detennmatJon does not include (lny detennmat10n as to other aspects ofpotenttal nonconfoIlTliry,
such as &etback or parkmg requIrements
All three properties EIre located m, and requIre complian(,e WIth. the .'Old Flonda" Distnot of
Beach hy Design Based on the lot sizl:s listed by the Pmellas County Property Appralser of
3 J 175 square feet (50' ;( 63 3 ') for 15 Avalon Street, 4,330 square feet (50' x 87') for 17 Avalon
Street land 5,525 square feet (50' x 110 5') fOr 16 Kendall Street, wluch totals 13,050 square feet,
and the maxlInum denSity of 30 dwellIng UDlts per acre, these three properties combmed may be
developed \Vlth a maxlmwn of eight dwelling UnItS
As discussed, under the Terrnmation of 5.tams ofNonoonfbrmlty provision of SectIon 6.109 and
the conversion factor from ovenught accommodanon uses (40 rooms per acre) to dwellIngs (30
UnItS per acre), the 15 total ovemlght aCGommodation tlmb at IS Avalon Street and 16 Kendall
Street :would COIlven to 11 dwelhns umt'l. Adding in the one dwellm@ Ulllt at 17 Avalon Street,
the total pOSSible under till!> scenano would be 12 dwelling unltS, assuming the Temunation of
Status of Nonconformity IS approved bV the Commumt> Development Board (CDB), Other
factors of SIte and bulldmg deSign, including setback!t, parkmg, heIght, etc, could affect the
deCISion of the COB
Should you have any add1tIona1 questtons, feel free to contact Wayne M, Wells, AICP, Planner
m, at 562-4504 or myself at 562-4561
~~t~~
ASslstl~nt Planning Director
If 0' ~(C~~W~ 0' i
OCT t 4 3Il4 '
Cc Chip Gerlock, Development ReVlew Manager
Wayne Wells, Planner III
PLANNING & DEVELOPMEN1
SERVICES
CITY OF CLEARWATER
I '!lCD ·
!t . ~
~ Ii ~ ~ .
II " III
I I ~
d~~
i &1 ~ I LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN
[;]1 ·
i ~ ~i g
~I ii~ ~
~ i;
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
II
I
: ~
I
I
I ,
I ~
II
I
11\:1
..
I
o
I
I
o
I
!
- -.........,
~~
I
I
CIY '''D PL.........". ....VIRO..M...T..L. TR....SPORT..TIO..
60t ... ITUIT. ......... 910 (JU) ...n-18" f. Xl Cn1) '4640"
CUA.. ...~. Inn I-MA&:: MlfTICH "'...Dtf'a....cOM
- Nonhslde
~S~.1t<<:..
I r-I I (' , ~ fA L
) j , ~
" [J)~C[~]W!~D-\
IUlll OCT 14aJ04 L'I
I I
PLANNiNG & ceVELOPMENT
SERVICES
CITY OF CLEARWATER
AutoCAD ProJects\0441 - (4mblCnCe)\Slte 10-08-04 dwg, 10/13/2004 1 0 ~J ~b Ll.M
",
:r
~~,.
~II
8 -... e '/JV
I
I
I
e I
~_ I )..
I~ ! ~
~ I ~~
Ii I ~~
~
, ...,
I
I
I
i
!
f "" -' ,
, '"
\ \....\4.....\(1.. \....
I
I
I
I
!
\\~l~ ~~~t~ ~ "\-'~
\\\1, \~\ \\\'~r.....,\\t-.....~y.
",..~
. ,
I,. '" ,., ~
'ii ~ ~211~
l;~ I~II
I: i ~II~
1: ~ II~M
! I II Ii: III
! I 8 e1 ~~~
I ~ s ; ,i
! 9 111
I ,
I
!
t
I oo.!>o II
~~~'(..
Ii!!" ~ i! Q
:l!~i:,"ll
~MU
LlJ
r i~
II ;TAKlNG SITE PLAN
C[] AMBIANCE ON WHITE SANDS
~ 1 Slmll1 AYALDNST aml161lIKDAl..l Sf
_ ClEARWAltR FL
Q
'O!
i
iNonhside
~ s~ 1'"-
itlV-.... LojI\."U;1I ....41"I'Q;I!iGi IMv.a....iIi\IKTA&... TRAl'iIlIiPof:lT4TtDN
illiG' 1UI......N11 ......DT ~ DD tJl". ....4~,. ..1!tI tn11 .4~"
c.......w...r "":ID.Io."," 5"'a&.l NUnat M~iIIll
~
II
ORIGINAL
~~~~- -~~--~ -..._~
I if~:'\ ~ r I ~ !j ~,71~ /10-
'fl 'lb\:::::JbU~~,
II ifl i OCT I 4 2004 UdJ I
~NNING & DEVELOPMENT I
SERVICES
I CITY OF CLEARWATER i
!<E.N~A1..~ ST
ORIGINAL
"T]
;U
IJ>
~
m
<
m
r
Gl
;0.
;:u
}> Z"'O
G) C)> I
m s:;;a W
1:) ro2S
S; mz ill
z ?:l0 12
00
Tl;t> ~~
:g?; l1i
?:lG)
Am ~ it
ZTl ~
Q;o ~ 0 t 1!1
(fJ(fJ ,... ~!I
Z "'O-l ~
0 ,
)>or ~!,
:;0 om '"
-l m< I
I CIlm
~ r
" ....
N ~
"'-
;
~
X
I
lil
~
~
gl
--- --- ~
" ~
,
hi
- - ij!'
d
0'1
'9 ~!;
);"
il
,
AVAL.O"'- Si
OCT I 4 2004
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
Si:: fi'JIC!::S
CITY OF CLEAqWATER
~>ll
I F1<~- _t -
i "'."_.,('-10 0 ~"~
~!"''''...,.''' ~
l,(\l't~ll~ ,\ W3
....1 f~ ~ <f~~~= !: ......... ~:;;..
I\(4 '~N!<!J.1!,\t "11'[
JJt.L t (' HIT F f 1
. ::~ 'l;:.;$:-~_. < ~
~I~
r
m
<
m
r
'"
"U
:>>
x
^ z-o
z: c>
(,) ~::lJ
UJC
mz
jl :::OG)
OG)
"TJ> "
-0::0 ;
>> J
:::OG)
3m
zU)
Glm
U)O
-00
>z
00
mr
Ulm
~<
.".m
r
~
~
b
-
-
'"
~
'[ O)~(C~~W~ .0'
In) I
u u OCT I 4 2004
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES
CITY OF CLEARWATER
N>j~
r~
~ --J.:tf It J( ~
tl 'l.. ':l!':l l)l \~
I '" >"", r rr, ~
"''1tl'lf \.... \
(l r fl~-,.b~ -: I I fr-i'lnt
'"
u
;;::-iiw
x~~
'w~
ORIGINAL
~
-,.,\ . ~~~~ t~~:
~t~o
~"': ~t~- ~~~
" i~~
'", ~~~
~:E ..l~ ~~:
r
n
<
m
,...
J ". t '"
"- "Tl
-c ,...
0
0
::u
"U
,...
'l>
z
jl
~
~
D
1\!4I ~hb..!........o::~ {i.'"
.l.ft] ~ I t H l T . ,. T
:~~ : ~ ;~;;~~~~ ~ ~ :~y ,~~!~I~~:~
-I ~
, '
,
ilJ)~(C~~W~
lu-~
\
.
,
I
'"
1
,-
D
~~l~
~~~~
~~~
~~~
-.
~~~
'.I:f
~~
e-
n
<
m
r
"'"
-.,.,
r-
o
o
;0
-u
r
;0.
Z
~l
;~l~
~~t
{~~
....~
J~-~
~ ~~'"
~ l::1l:.'
:,("
...1t;r.
..~...
[}
~~
S~
OCT I 4 2004
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
" SERVICES
CITY OF CLEARWATER
w>d
1 ~
~ LEVE' . fl ,}.}R ~LI l'I
~ li-U < rW..'R PLN'
f\.~ k~/d~~ ~ ;:.........
I;BJl I l II Iff .r T
~~~ ~;? ~~j~~ ~~~~ ~.:;:~:~~~~:i~~ I
Ii
, ,
,
! AM!'~~N(.' [.~
~~.ftl~ ~~ X
.#' l.f-.N~~IH.. f!....):R>_J
ORIGINAL
;~~~
;~r
;~~
~:~
~~~
::~~:i
~~~;-
~"~
~
ll"'1
l"
""l,;;
r-
m
<
m
r-
'"
-"
5
o
;(]
-u
~
z
~6
::l
I
"l
II
a
~.
!~
~@
,..
m
n=i
,..
'"
-"
,..
o
o
::0
11
!;
Z
~I
~ ~~ ~ ~ titE:~
~~': ~~~:
~ 5~ ~~~
~;~ ~:~
~ ~ ~ -~ ~
c;
~
q
\
~!
a-
~~
, J\,',H,J;0IG &. nr:VElOPMENl
S EJi\llCES
1"\ Qt- CI_E ,C<\iVATEq
~>j~
~I I'M
~il!.ll? ".1<'1''' .
-.("'1 ~ -... ..
(-t "-;,..,,, ;; ,~,'.~~ ~
1'Lf4f1 1-t1~~ ~ ..
I...IIll 1 r ~ i T 1}..~ Y
, '
l ~ ' ~ I
ORIGINAL
m
<:
m
,...
....
~ I
~~~~ ;i;~
~~f 0~~
l~ ~ ~ ~l.>
';~~ ~~~
Oi
.!!.
a
-~
H
".1
~o
":"I:?~~~OJ~~~~/ ,,~-: -:'.,^:-t:'~;o
:I!
O1>j~
>,
.'
"
~"
~l:
r
m
<
m
...
'"
-"
5
o
;0
"0
):
Z
jl
1"l;::!:; ~
; ;~;
~~~
~tt
+
co
1
b
\
~.
_I'
1~
OCT I 4 2004
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES
CITY' OF CLEARWATER
~t~_\1E! 1F_}-...RU"~fJ'\I
~i " '\,f,
~ "', ^N' f I r~
~Ul
~l= ....~..AHh II ....,~
~ ':':~~'~\';,,!,;r: ;:;-,,~"i.~:.: ;',~: ~), :^"-'-; ~;~>c': ~, !
~r~ "'<-':"'<'-...~ ............. _, "<w
If
J '
"'<
!t
b
ORIGINAL
;;0
o
o
-"
'tl
r
;p
Z
,
~~~=-~~:-:; -"-
OJ
-r-
jl
OJ
~--
-,
-,-
I
~ r-
~ I 1 -.
-1-
...l.__
I
OJ
t "
- -1- ~
"
z
o
::0
-i
I
m
,....
m
)';
::!
o
z
):>):>):>)> "'U ~~
".<
-l-l-l-l m ~
I'VW{JlOl ;:0
CD CD 00 CD () m
0l1'V(l')01 m ~
z ,..,
O"11"11"TJ ,....
-l-l-l-l -l m
;po ~
IIII G)
!:!! ITJ[!J[!:! m (5
z
G)OG:lG:l 0
IIII "'T1
-l-l-l-l
to
1+ 1+ 1+ 1+ C
............1'V01 r-
0.......:::..:::. 0
~(Jla{Jl Z
o 'if!..;f2.?fi- G)
):>
-l
g
"'T1
"'T1
m
;:u
m
z
-l
I
m
G:l
I
-i
(f)
;~: ~?f~ t:;: ~
l"~ .r:: ~h' 8
~m..... v~~ ~1Jl/:-1ll ,
~~~ ~~r ~g~~ g
g" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
.. <;J ,.It! ~
~ '11 ~ ~
~ ~ ~
a;
Ji
b
<>>
'I
o
18
01J> ~ ~
~ 1,1 JIl.l')'N~ 1I1 \). OI"NS ! N_n-=,N_-:" ~ _' ~
~I~ ~'">l~O.....
, ~o.\~~~~>.7( T_...."!I"1-::J;..
IV<illjh~M,(Qjl'I' ,f!1'
I..lIt} A I l II! ~ f l ,. f
:J
C")
-7
<&:::.-
)>
r-
EJi2Ji2Ji2Ji2Ji2J
~i2Ji2Ji2Ji2Ji2J
~R~ ~~, t, ii. ~
;)'t;== =:11ft ~ t8L.o' fr
~ I'!:m: ~ ~ ]; :i
~ ~ tt~ t:llll ~ ~
d, ~J! ~~, ~
~! j~ ~r ~
~ < ~ i
ir~~~~~w~ 0
i if U OCT I 4 2004
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
SERvICES
CITY OF CLEARWATER
J-.~ ~~ It'!::.: ~~1l~:~1 :41
~";I I' I ~ ::;n
:I~
~
,,-
'"
o 0-0
ODD
I
m
e-
m r~^ c-'g ~ m
~ ;;:: i~r )>
~- ~
o.J:")..... \~~~ ~
(5 ~\~~ ~- , m
z " ~~ , e-
J; ~ ~~~~ ~ m
<
" ~ ::=.
q ~
(5
z
OR\G\NA
I}~!i ~~2~ ~
~~t:
-~, ~~~i
~~~ ~
~,~ ~$t~ ~
i. 1~ ~
~ ~ .
~
".
IBIS rEi
181818
~b~~ " Z
.(IIr m;r.; ~ C
m\~Pn t.
::z;'l){ v
Ql!""mr ~
mOQo il
~Zf;ft
~~~m -<
r;j~....... ~
~~~ ~
-' IT! '-I"'l'J
""m ~
~ -l~O
!:. ;~~
:l '" "
" "'I-
"l 9.,>, ~
",om
o6~
"
'"
~ m If!-l \!l ';,~f
8 [~~~ ,. ~~i
I<
-< rn !i
" ~e.. to, ~~;
r, mm '"
,.' -<
~~~ ~ ~~~
I ~:-\!Q
~ 1; 9~n
q~...... to
::i '1_0<;' :t:l0)~
oj -I; ~ ;~~
"
OJ: ill ;1"
"
"l ft ~o
" ?
~ '"
,.. r
~ ~
q
-0
Q ~
~ ~
O(j)5
Olm
0:01<<>
'<0
mOm
)..m<
JJUlm
~ '
)> 0
-f -a
m ::
:0 m
Z
-j
DDDDDD
DD
~:J> ~ ~
r-' - N> ,. .",-<-'N~
~ ''''181 ,~, H , ! I\f<lI :J:~ lIIJjU I ~ 1m
...-n I.F l~"-};;3. lD:l ~ [ ,. ~ I T r r T
CI ~A'}\~...J'i;-~-,- ~ _........'?-~ I ..
........ ;:... _,..;"1 ~- ~~ ~~.......
>L;;::;_~;~:t,,-~"t~.. :;~~j" -:;:, ~:-;~:~~
IBIS
~
~
~
.
;
=
c<
-::::::::
DlJl
;1;
I '
ORIGINAL
EXTERIOR FINISHES
(2)
SW 6379
Jersey Cream
STUCCO FINISH -
COLOR: SW6379
"JERSEY CREAM"
SW 6373
Harvester
CD
STUCCO FINISH-
COLOR: SW6373
"HARVESTER"
L ___
ALUMINUM RAILINGS,
CONCRETE BALLUSTERS,
WINDOW/DOOR FRAMES,
TRIM.
COLOR: SW7000
"IBIS WHITE"
SW 7000
Ibis White
PlJ.\NNING & DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES
CITY OF CLEARWATER
-
'-/
Z
:E
-
-
;:j
,.i
~
>
Z
......
o...J
r.r.
l3
;;.
;lC
'":
=
~
:.- .r
'":
-'
, ': J:~J1J~(J~\J~~
~~lJ~~\lI_
iG-, i]ui]-
~.= .. ..1.. . E ,
~ .~ . ~ . . g
5 _ 'E3 _.'.~.. ___.. !
-. . =1 . ;;;;;1,;;;;;'
=. . =:=il .. ::::'t- = :c
- ~ ~. =
U31'tfMtJ\"318 -JO JUI=:-'
S3:J I/', tB S
IN3~d013/\JCJ '0' DNJN~J\i lel
o
~ 17 I IJO fl [ I
. I
9&n~U)\3(lJ,
S!!J~U \\//;=1\
c:::::J '-=/ c:J _.
l'v'N181tjO
v
v;
E!
). - -
";'
=
."
- --
...:
~ ......
r
....:
..--....
\-;'a. \~--w''''~'-~- \'~-'\'~-~-~-
0.-;'_ .~.. ~.. ;~_ .~_ '.~_
..- "'--;' -~ ...-~ - ' --~
\~"f~- (~-r~-t~- f.E-
:~-V~-\~~- V.~- f.\- \~~-
-----
o
1:131 V'Mt/\"'31.J .:jO AlI.J
S3.JII',t/3S
lN3~d013/\30 ~ 8NINNVld
~ t7 I lJO
S7 /:\ n ~ ,0 ~
c::; I' i/", 'i C:;., ~,
~- L,' ~ _ =_ _ .--
7'r1NI91(iO
n 0,r
j Ii
I '
\. ..)
~
,.
lC
"":
=
"":
~
~ l-:O-
I
-
=1 fl=, ~~J
- 1- JI'._
- - -
== ~- .~= ~
- ,- .
I - _
. - ; :=;;. wi.
: "" i
. -.. .
=. . '-.
= - -
~----. .
i . I . jl
I . :=- I
II II
,~ .~ - - - --
,.
-~\i~ 1,' 1 f:: 1 . ,
=1
-.
-';",.
~;~;f;~'~~-
.:t~:t~:~~~
"1:";l<b' r'
. ~.~~.'
I
L
'-
ORIGINAL
PINELLAS co
OFF .REC.BK 966 t1NTy FLA.
.3 PG 1.361
TOGETHER with a.ll the tenements, hereditaments and
appurtenances thereto belonging Dr in anywIse appertaIning.
TO HAVE AND '1'0 RDLD, the same In fee simple
togetber .
AND the Grantor hereby covenants with said Grantee
that the Grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee
simple; that the Grantor has good right and lawful
authority to sell and convey said land; that the Grantor
hereby fully warrants the title to saId land and will
ddend the same agaInst the lawful claims of all persons
whomsoever; and that saId land 15 free and clear of all
encumbrances, except taxes accruing subseguent to
Dacembe1: 31, 1996.
IN WITBESS WHEREOF. the saId Grantor has sIgned and sealed
these presents 'the day and year first allove wrItten.
Signed, sealed Bnd delivered
l~
Witness: I L
Wh'N0 G. biE./('SEP\
Ql(k~~-~
Wi ess:
Kl~~ ha,LACO~D
S'rA'fE elF FLORIDA
CelUNT\I' OF PlNELLAS
~
~-r~
CARMEN T. BAClz.g
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before
me thIs ~ day of March. 199'. by John Bacue and
Carmen T. B~ile\. who are personally known to me or who
produced r::J- ~v as valid identificatIon and
who did not take oath.
f)))}lJJ))lJ))))))))))JJJJbJ>>.J
'~~~~~:J!
· ~n.Ii My CoJn.m.u. No CC 386524 .
~"""I"".....g......bJ on E.q.~ &/16.198
Printea n~~".ft9.t?iJ.1.'
and Seal:
"\
NOTARy1f:!!:!:::.L
~
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES
CITY OF CLEARWATER
\
I
l .
I
~~}.:~
Norlhsitle
e,~1' s~ 1m:,~
ORIGINAL
CIVil.
LAND PLANNING.
ENVIRONMENTAL.
TRANSPORTATION.
STORMWATER REPORT
FOR:
r
i r-- ~ I~ A ~- - - ,
:~~~:~~~~~~I
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES
CITY OF CLEARWATER
AMBIANCE ON WHITE SANDS
PROJECT
,
c, ,
,...'" I (
r ,
'"' .- ".)
0. ':.J 0 'J.. (J':' /'
r ..-- ~" oil! IIIlI ',...
nneth Roush, 'B~'E. #,3~qy66Q(. S~, c
/ , "').... J1~ 'J_--,(l.V ""t
/1"]- fj'-tJ-v#r ! I ".I' ~t
l/VCJ,,(?l)/~~::~ r~~,(J
'1" t
, I
October 2004
Project No. 0441
601 ClEVELAN D STRE ET, SU ITE 930
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755
NESADMIN@MINDSPRIN( COM
NESTECH@MINDSPt\'NG COM
727 443 2869 FAX 727 446, 8036
NORTHSIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES
25 YEAR STORM EVENT
PROJECT AMBIANCE ON WHITE SANDS
PROJECT NO 441
RUN.OFF COEFFICIENTS
PRE.cONSTRUCnON
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA=
IMP AREA=
POND AREA=
PERV AREA=
ORfGINAL
13050 SF 030AC
11,012 SF OF IMP AREA@ C:::
o SF OF POND AREA @ C :::
2,038 SF OF PERV AREA @ C =
045
1
02
C'" 041
* C::: 09/2 = 045 PER CITY OF CLEARWATER REQUIREMENTS
POST .cONSTRUCTION
TOTAL DRAiNAGE AREA'"
IMP AREA'"
POND AREA:::
PERV AREA'"
C'"
085
STORAGE CAlCULATION
PRE.CONSTRUCTlON
DRAINAGE AREA =
TIME OF CONG Te '"
I @ Te =60 (25 YEAR EVENT)",
Q(oul)::: C x I x A '"
POST .cONSTRUCTION
13,050 SF 0 30 AC
11,005 SF OF IMP AREA @ C '"
1,029 SF OF POND AREA @ C "
1,016 SF OF PERV AREA@ C"
09
1
02
030AC
60 MIN
3 50 IN/HR
o 43 CFS
TIME I Q{m) INFLOW OUTFLOW STORAGE
(MINl (IN/HR) rCFS) (CF\ rCF) ICFI
6000 350 089 3,221 1,551 1670
MAX STORAGE =
WEIR DESIGN
TOP OF WEIR ELEV "
BOT OF WEIR ELEV "
H"
Q=
L(FT)"'Q13 3"H^1 5 =
TOTAL VOLUME REQUIRED;; MAX STORAGE REQUIRED"
TOTAL VOLUME PROViDED::: MAX STORAGE PROVIDED '"
1,670 CF
783
690
093 FT or 11"
043
015 FT or2"
1 670 CF
1,670 CF
ii ~\ ~(C~~~[E
i I L>>~ )
:lr~
I
I
I
OCT , 4 2004
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES
CITY OF CLEARWATER
JRIGINAL
NORTHSIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES
50 YEAR STORM EVENT
PROJECT
AMBIANCE ON WHITE SANDSIOB NUMBER
RUN-DFF COEFFICIENTS
PRE-CONSTRUCTION
TOTAL AREA=
IMP AREA=
POND AREA;;;
PERV AREA;:;
c=
POST -CONSTRUCTION
TOTAL AREA;;;
IMP AREA=
POND AREA=
PERV AREA=
041
c=
085
POST DEVELOPMENT CALCULATION
PRE-CON STRUCTJON
AREA (ACRES) =
TIME OF CONC Tc (MIN)=
I @ Te ;:;60 (MIN)(50 YEAR EVENT);:;
Q(out) = Q @ Tc (eFS) =
POST -CON STRUCTlO N
441
13,050 SF
11,012 SF OF IMP AREA @ C;:;
o SF OF POND AREA@ C =
2,038 SF OF PERV AREA @ C =
045
1
02
13,050 SF
11,005 SF OF IMP AREA @ C =
1,029 SF OF POND AREA @ C =
1,016 SF OF PERV AREA@ C =
09
1
02
030
60
400
049
TIME I Q(In} INFLOW OUTFLOW STORAGE
(MIN) IlNfHR) (CFS) (CF) (CFl (CF)
6000 400 1 02 3,682 1,773 1,909
MAX STORAGE =
WEIR DESIGN
TOP OF WEIR ELEV =
BOT OF WEIR ELEV =
H;:;
Q=
L(FT)=Q/33"H^1 5 =
TOTAl VOLUME REQUIRED;:; MAX STORAGE REQUIRED =
TOTAl VOLUME PROVIDED;:; MAX STORAGE PROVIDED;:;
1,909 CF
783
690
093 FT or11"
049
o 17 FT or 2"
1 ,909 CF
1,909 CF
Iro ~(G~~W~ D--~
I OCT I 4 2004 I
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Oh\G\NAL
PROJECT NAME:
AMBIANCE ON WHITE SANDS
PROJECT NO. :
441
POND'S STAGE STORAGE DATA.
BOTTOM EL.=
STAGE AREA AREA STORAGE
ft-NGVD SF AC CF
800 2,053 0047 2,245
783 1,895 0043 1,909
770 1,774 0.041 1,670
690 1,029 0024 549
650 657 0.015 212
600 191 0004 0
T.O.B. EL.=
50YR. D.H.W. EL.=
25YR. D.H.W. EL.=
W Q. EL.=
TOTAL WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS:
DRAINAGE AREA :;:
13,050 SF
REQUIRED WATER QUALITY DEPTH =
o 50 IN
REQUIRED WATER QUALITY VOLUME =
544 CF
PROPOSED OUTFALL ELEVATION =
6.90 FT
AVAILABLE WATER QUALITY:;:
----I 549 CF
I~~\~(C~~W~
I I~,
I \
Lr~U OCT I 4 2004
PLA,NNING & DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES
CITY OF CLEARWATER
ORIGINAL
MODRET
SUMMARY OF UNSATURATED & SATURATED INPUT PARAMETERS
PROJECT NAME: 0441 Ambiance on White Sands - Pollution
POLLUTION VOLUME RUNOFF DATA USED
UNSATURATED ANALYSIS EXCLUDED
Pond Bottom Area
191.00 ft2
1,670 00 ft3
2800
0.00 ft
2.50 ft
Pond Volume between Bottom & DHWL
Pond Length to Width Ratio (LjW)
ElevatIon of Effective Aquifer Base
Elevation of Seasonal High Groundwater Table
ElevatJon of Startmg Water Level
Elevation of Pond Bottom
DeSIgn High Water Level Elevation
Avg. Effective Storage Coefficient of SOil for Unsaturated AnalysIs
Unsaturated Vertical Hydrauhc Conductivity
6.00 ft
6.00 ft
7 70 ft
0.21
o 42 ft/d
200
o 9S ft/d
023
100
Factor of Safety
Saturated HOrizontal HydrauliC Conductivity
Avg. Effective Storage Coefficient of Soli for Saturated AnalysIs
Avg Effective Storage CoeffiCient of PondjExfiltratlon Trench
Hydraulic Control Features:
Top Bottom Left
Groundwater Control Features - Y IN N N N
Distance to Edge of Pond 0.00 000 0.00
ElevatIon of Water Level 0.00 000 0.00
Impervious Barrier - Y IN N N N
ElevatIon of Barner Bottom 000 0.00 0.00
Right
N
000
000
N 000 I
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
SE RVICES
CITY OF CLEAClWATER
OR\G\NAl
MODRET
TIME - RUNOFF INPUT DATA
PROJECT NAME: 0441 AMBIANCE ON WHITE SANDS - POLLUTION I
STRESS INCREMENT VOLUME
PERIOD OF TIME OF RUNOFF
NUMBER (hrs) (ft3)
Unsat 0,00 0.00
1 1.00 544.00
2 888 0.00
3 888 0.00
4 888 000
5 8.88 0.00
6 8.88 0.00
7 888 0.00
8 888 0.00
9 888 000
'" M.JNING & DEVELOPMEN1
sc: n JICES
, C'Y or: CLEAllWATEq
OR\G\NAL
MODRET
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
PROJECT NAME: 0441 Ambiance on White Sands - Pollution
CUMULAllVE WATER INSTANTANEOUS AVERAGE CUMULAllVE
TIME ELEVATION INFILTRATION INFILTRATION OVERFLOW
(hrs) (feet) RATE (ds) RATE (ds) (ft3)
00 00 - 0.00 2500 0.000 *
000000
0.00 2500 o 03578
0.03390
100 6430 o 03203 0.00
0.01538
862 6000 001180 0.00
000821
18.75 5662 000689 000
0.00557
27.63 5481 o 00491 0.00
0.00424
3650 5343 o 00384 0.00
0.00344
4538 5231 000317 0.00
0.00290
5425 5137 o 00271 000
000251
63.13 5055 0,00237 000
o 00222
72.00 4983 000
r-""\ IS' r(U I~ fl \\ 17 re ~I
l j l.::::J~lSU VIS j
I ,........" '\ I I
I, I I OCT I . tJnnJl ) )
.; l" ~) JI
I
" I,j\J"JII\Ir.. R. 0'-'" ~I I
.. "-.F'III .
SEnv'ICES I
~I IY OF CLE,H VJA TER
MaXImum Water Elevation 6.430 feet @ 100 hours Recovery @ 8621 hours
* Time Increment when there IS no runoff
WARNING MaXimum Infiltration Rate 2982 ft/day Exceeds Vertical Permeability. 0.210 ft/day
Volume Infiltrated (fP)
~~~~~NNNNNWWWWW~~~~~~~~
N~m~ON~m~ON~m~ON~mOOON~mOOON~
0000000000000000000000000000
o 4 I t I l ~ ~. I I
-I
o w
g:
~
E"
3
CD
:J ~~
g ~
et-
a. ~
ll~
01
~
~ 01
;:t;
~
N
m
-...j
CXl
b'31 VMb'1;'31:J :10 A.1I0
S3:::Mb'3S
iN3v.ld0131\30 '8 SiNJNNV1d
tOOl V J J.3O
lVNI91>JO
z
"
F
....
:::u
~
5
z
o
t
....
J>o
s:
tII
;;:
Z
C')
m
o
z
::
:r:
::::j
m
Ch
>
Z
C
Ul
"tI
o
r-
r-
c
-I
(5
Z
, .
"t:I
"-
cr<:
<1l
-l
:J"
iii
W
-0
~
n
:a
(5
:J
~
tr
Cll
... -l
(l):J"
::; Ui
(l) _
::E (Jl
(l) W
a....
W(l)....
:J () ....
o.(l)....
'<~Cii
0......_
c 0 en
~ ~ Z
=:JO
O"W....
(l) "0 >
:J'O
0=-1J
s:gm
-......:;0
(l) 6,
o.:J=:"
w......=i
(Jl 0
...... ...
o W
5''0
(l) (l)
o 3
c ;::;.
n
o
3
(l)
o
......
g.
(tI
W
'0
~
n
:a
6
:J
J /
j
I~
c--
2:
-l~
I r
Ie
,-,
II
o
...,
r
,..
- '.J
- -'
(-' L': f.J
'- IJ 0
/
\
[1r I f
ft-
a:
JJ
I-
....
...
--.
r:
()
""d
~
~
3
,..,
:l
,...
~
o
,...
~
n
:r
(">
n
::<;"
>
,Q
c:
>
UJ
C
Z
t:l
tTl
<:
tTl
r-'
o
""0
~
tTl
Z
-l
r'
r'
n
(=)
o
-.l
'-0
;-
""0
,.,
....
[Il
o
:l
so
..
;.
<:>
=-
"'='
~
~
3
It>
:l
,...
'"
t""
:;
'"
...
'"
3
-l
=
...
~
..."
r-'
t:l
tv
o
f:
,
o
:Xl
o
VI
'-0
t""
5
'"
-
....
n '"
~ 3
'" '"
'"
z
o
:::0
(t>
~
(t>
... .
"C
...,.
::;:j::
I::l
~ ....
.....N
l't> 0
=0
oo~
--0
NO
~O
NO
=0
=0
.a:.. 0
o
o
o
QIO
-....]
0\
N
)- )-
Vl 3 Vl a tv
- - 00
" <:> <:> 0 ---
'" N ~N = N N = 0 tv
fl c 0 ;; c 0 ;; W 0'\
!:l ()l VI ()l VI N
0 -= 0 -= 00
'" 0 ~ 0 ~ ""0 0
~ c 0 is. c 0 is. ~ 0
-t:>.
-=
~
"'<:
..
...
-
~
E
<;:;
n
=-
'"
'"
;0;-
Z
<:>
n
=
=
:'I
3
'Z
<:>
::t'
<:>
::;
',:
'"
'"
!::
.,.
'"
=-
o -l
-f>. ...
III
=
n
e
=-
'"
..." :::l
n '"
~ ~
a- .,
(0 -s
n is
o =
3
3
'"
....
n
~
o
o
~
-f>.
N
0'\
tv
',:
'"
.,.
'"
=
<::
'"
>-
'"
'"
<:>
<::
~
Z
<:>
. Jf
'< """
'I
fUI1f111UDQ",
~G~~r: l\ J OF rIlFJt<>
,~~ ~~'I....)r:;?X~
/;''''p;;:;".,'' ~~*~.~""'';.
,,~;:>:;..' \ II , ,;... ""...
......~,"'.......~.J -~1:li
~~~~\ , -<;;::It'"
."r-::. -..==-: ~~
..~ ~ -=---=- ~C!,
':.~--- .,,~,;~
"'~~~*-""""~'Vt.,+'+
.........,~Eft,J.t
-".lI1I1D
CITY OF
CLEARWATER
LONG RANGE P!.Al'INING
DEVEI OPMI:.NT REviEW
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, Cl F-i\RWATI:.R, FWRlDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAl SERVICES BUILDIlI<G, 100 SOUTH MYRTIE AVENUe, ClEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
November IS, 2004
Ms. Debra Butler
NO! thslde Engmeenng Sel VIces, [nc
601 Cleveldnd Street, SlIIte 930
Clearwater, FL 33755
RE Development Order - Case FLD2004-0S059rrDR2004-0800S - 15 - 17 Avalon Street and 16
Kendall Street
Dear Ms Butler
ThIS letter constitute,> a Development Order pursuant to SectlOn 4-206 D 6 of the Commumty
Development Code On November 16, 2004, the Commumty Development Board reviewed your
requests for (\) TemlmatlOn of Status of NonconformIty for density (15 overnight dccommodatlOn UnIts -
to be convelted to 11 dwellmg umts), under the provIsIons of SectlOn 6-109, (2) FleXible Development
approval to pemllt a total of 13 attached dwellIngs m the MedIUm Hlgh Denslty Resldenhal (MHDR)
Dlstnct and TOUTlst (T) Dlstnct with reductIOns to lot area m the MHDR Dlstnct from 15,000 square feet
to 8,700 squarc feet and m the T DIstnct from 10,000 sqUdre feet to 4,350 square feet, reduehons to lot
wIdth m the MHDR Dlstnct from 150 feet to 100 feet and In the T DIstnct from 100 feet to 50 feet,
reductlOns to the front (north along Avalon Street - MI-IDR Dlstnct) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet (to
buildmg) and from 25 feet to zero feet (to dumpster stagmg pad), a reductIOn to the slde (west - MHDR
Dlstnct) flom 10 feet to zero feet (to bUlldmg), a reduCl10n to the rear (south - MHDR Dlstnct) from 15
feet to 10 feet (to bulldmg), a reduction to the front (south aIong Kendall Street - T Dlstnet) from 15 feet
to 10 feet (to buddmg), a reductIOn to the side (west - T DIstnct) from 10 feet to zero feet (to bUlldmg),
an mcrease to buddmg heIght In the MHDR Dlstnct from 30 feet and m the T DIstnet from 35 feet to
695 feet (to loof deck) wlth penmeter parapets of 367 feet (from roof deck) and decoratIve roof
structUles of 10 I feet (flOm roof deck) and to penmt a bUlldmg wIthm the vIslblhty tnangles, as a
ResIdentIal Inflll Project to the MHDR Dlstnct and as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project m
the T Dlstnct, under the provISIons of SectIOns 2-404 F and 2-803 C, (3) ReductIOn to the front penmeter
buffer along Avalon Street m the MHDR Dlstnct from 10 feet to zero feet (to dumpster stagIng pad) and
a reductIon to the sIde (west) landscape buffer m the MHDR Dlstnct from 10 feet to zero feet (to
bUlldmg), as a Comprehensive Landscape Plan, under the provIsIOns of Section 3-1202 G, and (4)
Transfer of DeveIopmcnt Rights (TDR2004-08008) of one dwellmg Unit to thIS site from 321 Coronado
Dn ve, under thc plOvlslons of Sec..tlOn 4-1402, at ] 5 - 17 Avalon Street and 16 Kendall Street The
Community Development Board (COB) DENIED the application WIth the followmg bases
Bases fOJ Demal
1 The plOposal does not comply With thc FleXible Development ell tena as a Re51denhal Infill PrOject
pel SectIOn 2-404 F
2 rhe proposal doe s not camp I Y WI th the Fl ex 1 b Ie Devel opmen t cn tena as a Co mpl ehcnsl ve Infi 11
Redevelopment Project per Section 2-S03 C
BRlAN J AUNGS r, MJ\ \ OR COMM 1,>')IONrR
HOYI HAMIl 101'1, VICF MAYOR-COMM1%IONrR WHITNFY GRJ\\ COM\jbolONI B
FRt\NK HIlJlJARD, COMi\USSIONEB * BlIl JONSON, CO~I\ll~'>IOr-.1 R
"F QUAI EMPl OYMrNT AND AH IRi\I1\ I lVI Ac I ION EMPI OITR '
~
· If'
coo,
f
November 18, 2004
Buttel - Page 2
3 The proposal IS not In compItance wlth other standards m the Code mcludmg the General
Appilcabll1ty Cn tena per SectIOn 3-913
4 rhe development IS not compatible wlth the surroundmg area and wlll not enhance other
redevelopment efforts
5 The pi oposdlls not In compl1dnce wIth the Old Flonda D]stnct of Beach by DeSign
6 The proposal IS not m comphance w1th the cntellJ fO! the Transfer of Developm~nt Rlghts per
SectIon 4-1403 A
7 "I he Commumty Development Code does not permit stacked Pdrkmg
An appeal of a Level 'I wo approval (FleXIble De'l-elopment) may be Imt1ated pursuant to Section 4-502 B
by the appllGdnt or by any perwn granted party stdtUS wlthm 14 days of the date of thIs Development
Ord er The f111 n g 0 f an a pp llc a tl on/notIc e 0 f a ppea] 'iha 11 stay the effect of the dee ISI on pendmg the final
determmatlOn of the case The appeal peflod for your case expIres on November 30, 2004 (14 days from
the date of the CDB meetmg)
If you have any questlOns, please do not hes1tate to call Wayne M Wells, AlCP, Planner III, at 727-562-
4504 You can access zoning mformatlon for parcels withm the C1ty through our webslte
www rnyclearwatel com
CynthIa H Tarapanl, AlCP
PlannIng Dlrector
S IP/nl1lJlI1g DepnJllllenl\C D B\TLEXIPel1d/JIg cnscslUp [Of (lie ne). ( CDBIA \11//0/1 /5 A mbwlIce on While Sands - DemedlA \l1//Oll j 5
De\le!opmenl Order doc
(.:
'message
Page 1 of2
Wells, Wayne
From Roger Larson [RogerL@Jpflrm com]
Sent Monday, November 15, 2004 1 39 PM
To Wells, Wayne
Subject RE Aqua Sun (15 - 17 Avalon and 16 Kendall
Thanks Wayne I was unaware of that distinction On a closer review of the map you are correct Thanks
Roger
Roger A Larson, EsqUire
Johnson, Pope, Bokor,
Ruppel & Burns, LLP
911 Chestnut Street
Clearwater, Flonda 33756
VOice 727-461-1818
Fax 727-462-0365
rogg.r.!@JQflrm com
- ----Ong I na I M essagen---
From: Wayne Wells@myClearwater com [mallto Wayne Wells@myClearwater com]
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 1 02 PM
To: Roger Larson
Subject: RE Aqua Sun (15 - 17 Avalon and 16 Kendall
Roger-
Please be aware that the zonmg line between the MHDR and T Districts follOWS the platted lot line, nol the
ownership lines With Lots 5 (15 Avalon) and Lot 6 (17 Avalon) being 100 feet wide (total width, 50 feet
wide each lot) by 87 feet deep, Ihls prod uces an area of 8,700 square feet Lol 14 (16 Kendall) IS 50 feet
wide by 87 feet deep, or a lotal area of 4,350 square feet The lot area of 13,050 square feel was supplied
by the representative and engineer for Ihe project (Northslde Engineering) These are the numbers used In
the Staff Report and they are correct
Wayne
-----0 rlgl na I Message-----
From: Roger Larson [mailto'RogerL@]pflrm com]
Sent: Monday, November IS, 2004 12 20 PM
To: Weils, Wayne
Subject: Aqua Sun (15 - 17 Avalon and 16 Kendall
Wayne I Just completed some calculations on the demmslons of the property My calculations
show the 15 and 17 Avalon address as 3,175 and 4,350 respectively for a 7,525 total square feet or
a 50% reduclion In MDR lot size and the 16 Kendal as 5,572 square feet or a 55% reduction The
total square feet are 13,100 or a 3008 acre
Not Significant, but we should be uSing the correct numbers
Thanks
Roger
11115/2004
..
r!?1essdge
11/15/2004
Page 2 of2
Roger A Larson, EsqUire
Johnson, Pope, Bokor,
Ruppel & Burns, LLP
911 Chestnut Street
Clearwater, Flonda 33756
VOice 727-461-1818
Fax 727-462-0365
rO~@lQflrm com
'-'
,.
Wells, Wayne
From
Sent
To
Subject
Wells, Wayne
Wednesday, November 10, 2004 2 43 PM
'aldacalderonl@aol com'
FLD2004-08059/TDR2004-08008, 15-17 Avalon Street and 16 Kendall street
I have been asked to forward to you a copy of the Staff Report for the above referenced project This project IS scheduled
to be reviewed by the Community Development Board (COB) on Tuesday, November 16, 2004 The meeting starts at
2 00 pm Should you have any questions, feel free to emall me back or to call me at 727-562-4504
Wayne Wells
~
Avalon 15 Staff
Report doc
I I
,
1
I'
V
I
..... 'IV ,......_
- '"
JOHNSON, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, LLP
ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW
E D ARMSTRONG III
BRUCE H BOKOR
JOHN R BONNER SR *
GUY M BURNS
JONATHAN S COLEMAN
STACY COSTNER
MlCHALL T CRONL'I
ELIZABETH J DANIELS
BECKY FERRELL-ANTON
COLU:bN M l-l.YNN
RlNA I HAOA"
MARION HALE
SCOTI C ILGENfR]TZ
FRANK R JAKES
TIMO rHY A JOHN~ON, JR
SHARON E KRICK
ROGER A LAR"ON
JOHN R LAWSON JR*
IX ANNr IIT]ZE
MICHAEL G UTILE
MICHAEL C MARKHAM
ZACHARY D ME-'>SA
A R CHARUl: Nl:AL
TROY J PERDUE
F WALLACE POPI:. JR
ROB1-Rl V POrtl:R JR
AUDRloY B RAUCHWAY
DARRYL R RICHARD:'
PETER A RIVELUNl
DENNl" G RUPPEL*
CHARL1-S A SAMARKOS
PHlllPM SHASI1-1-N
JOAN M VECClI/OLl
~ ll-VI:N H Wl:IN HERG FR
JOSEPH J WEISSMAN
STEVEN A WILLIAMSON
*OF COUNSEL
PLEASl: RbPLV TO CLl:ARWATER
FILE NO
November 4, 2004
Re Ambience on White Sands
Case No. FLD2004-080S9-1S Avalon Street
ORIGINAL
l~o)~(C~~W~ f1-~ I,
'lll NOV 43D4 l~i
Community Development Board
City of Clearwater
100 S Osceola Street
Clearwater, Flonda
Ladles and Gentlemen PLANNING & ['EVELOPMENl
SERVICES
CITY OF CLE/\RWATER
I represent the Applicant, Aqua Sun Development, LLC~ ::rhe Slaff IlIruuyh Il::;
report has accurately set forth the request of the Applicant for the subject property
There are some salient features of the property that I believe are Important In revlewmg
this request
Property Size and Configuration:
The property IS In the nature of an "L" shape, With the bottom of the L abutting
the south nght-of-way line of Avalon Street and bemg 1 DO-feet In length and the top of
the L abutting the north nght-of-way line of Kendall Street and being SO-feet In length,
the west sIde of the property connects Kendall Street and Avalon Street, abuts the
pubJrc parking lot and has a distance of a 17390 feet, With the balance of the "L" haVing
a north/south distance of 8690 feet and an east/west distance of SO.feel.
The property IS abutted dIrectly on the west by a parking area owned by the City
of Clearwater, which I believe IS currently used for public parking
Under the Land Development Code ("Code"), the property has two fronts, Ie,
the frontage on Avalon Street and the frontage on Kendall Street, each requmng a 25-
foot set back Because of the nature of the configuration of the property, there IS a rear
set back th at IS req UI red to be 1 5- feet and sid e set backs, WhIch are req UI red to be 1 0-
feet both on the east side of the property and on the west side of the property
CLEARW ,nER O~"FICh
911 CHESTNUT ST
POST OFHCF BOX] 368
CI FARWAlrR rl.OR1DA33757 1368
ThLLPHO'>h (727) 46] lS18
TELFCOPlER (727) 462 0365
r AMP ~ FlCh
lOON AMPAST
~ Ih 1800
POST ICE BOX 1100
TAMPA, ORIDA 3360]-1100
TEl 1'1' ONE (S] 3)225 2500
I hLLCOI'lhR (213) 223 7118
f)
-
r OJ~lC~~WI~ [)~ \
JOHNSON, POPE, BOKO ~~ ~~~lEL & BURNS, L I /,p RIG I NA L
ATTORNEYS AND tjNSl! RSNQVLA_wA 2004 \-----' \
CommunIty Development Board OPMENl
b PLANNING & DeVEL
Novem er 4, 2004 SERVICES
Page 2 CITY OF CLEARWATER
The property has two zoning dlstncts, one being Medium High Density
ResidentIal (MHDR) and the other being Tourist In MHDR the minimum lot size IS
15,000 square feet where only 8,700 square feet eXist and In the Tourist district the
minimum lot size IS 10,000 square feet where only 4,350 square feet eXists At the
current time, the uses are legal non-conforming uses Within the zOning dlstncts When
the Improvements are destroyed, the applicant must comply With current Code
Existing Conditions:
The current uses of the property are a SIngle-family dwelling, which IS located In
the eastern most portion of the property and the other eXisting Improvement IS a
tranSient motel consisting of two (2) two-story framed bUildIngs With a one-story framed
bUilding or bUildings lYing between the two story bUildings This IS a slxteen.unlt motel
In terms of intensity of use, which would Impact the services provIded by the City
the current use of traffiC Impact would be 149 24 tnps per day, wherein a 13-unlt
residential condominium would generate 54 34 tnps per day
The current use of the motel on fire and emergency services Including police
would far exceed the Impact on those same CIty servIces for a 13-unlt condominIum
This bUilding WIll be fully spnnklered and meet all of the current bUilding and fire
codes of the City of Clearwater
The requests of the applicant are directed to the Land Development Code and
are not requests to modify or otherwise abrogate the bUilding or fire codes of the CIty of
Clearwater
Overall Improvement to the Property Area:
Some of the pnmary Improvements to the eXisting propertIes once developed are
as follows
1 There are twenty-four parking spaces underneath the bUilding Therefore,
there Will be no on-street parking ThiS exceeds the Code requirement by four spaces
2 Each Item set forth In the report prepared by Wayne Wells for Thursday,
October 7,2004 has been answered and responded to favorably by the applicant uSing
the La Rlsa gUidelines except for the zero lot line request on the west SIde of the
property. The applicant IS of the opinion that because thiS abuts a City parking lot,
whIch IS currently under deed restnctlon, which minimizes the development of that
property that the zero lot Ime request IS of little consequence to the abutting property
r-- [Et[E~w~ ~\
JOHNSON, POPE, Bd W IlURNSJhI.L~ P ORIGIN
AfIORNf.YS A l)-~'~ loLLNO'V Ar A"1.tl04 lS/l\ A~!
Community Development Board U
November 4,2004 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENl \
Page 3 SERVICES'
CITY OF ClEr\RWATER
owner All maintenance of the bUlldt"ng and landscaping proposed for the bUilding can
be accomplIshed insIde the lot lines without use of the City owned property to the west
Staff concerns:
1 Staff IS of the opinion that the overall use of the property IS to extensIve
both as to the size of the bUilding footpnnt, and as to ItS height In that there IS an
attempt to place too much bUilding structure within the confines of the boundary of the
property
2 Staff IS concerned with the height as It relates to the surrounding property
3 Staff IS also concerned that the design of the bUilding and Its architecture
and ambIence IS not of the ambience that they desire
Argument for Approval:
1 The size of the lots as It relates to the zonIng d,stnct cannot be solved
The fact IS that the lots were platted and created and the Improvements bUilt thereon at
a time when the Code permitted such use and such Improvements The fact that the
zoning district parameters were changed due to an amendment to the Code makes Just
about any use within that property non~conformlng due to lot size The Developer IS left
with bUIlding on land that IS not bUildable If the restriction as to lot size IS enforced
2 The proposed structure will meet all of the bUilding codes as are currently
established with the City of Clearwater and more Importantly will be In compliance with
all of the fIre codes as are currently Implemented by the City of Clearwater
3 There IS adequate and suffICient parking In excess of the Code
underneath the bUilding
4 The eXIstIng set back lines tor the eXisting Improvements are 12 3 feet on
the front, 4 7 feet on the side and 47 feet on the rear In the proposed site plan the
side and rear set backs will be Increased to 10-feet, but the front set back will be
reduced to 10-feet from 12 3 feet, wIth a zero lot lIne on the west
5 The ImperviOUS surface ratio for both the eXisting and proposed remains
the same Each are under the required.
6 With respect to open space, both eXisting and proposed shall remain
16% Notwithstanding, It IS not a reqUirement
JOHNSON ~ ~~:;~Y~~:DO:~U~'~~~:~ ~ ~A~RNS, LJ~~ ') fE (C fE ~ W fE_ f[-~~
Community Development Board U lJ NOV 4 2004 I! ~
NpaOgveem4ber 4, 2004 0 RIG' N A L ......
PU\NNING & rJl:VELOPMEN1
SERVICES
CITY OF CLE,;RWfl,TEq
,
I
I~-
7 ParkIng lot Intenor landscaping wIll be Increased by 28% to 32% of the
land area where only 10% IS requIred.
8 Currently parking IS open Under the proposed there will be twenty-four
(24) spaces where only twenty (20) are required
9 The overall ambience of the properties lYing west of Mandalay, If this
project IS allowed to proceed, will be Improved and will be consistent with the proposals
and goals of Beach by Design
10 With respect to height Due to the fact that the first floor hVlng elevation
must meet the FEMA reqUirement, the heIght of the bUilding becomes somewhat
Irrelevant once you pass the second floor Even If you were to approve a 4-story
bUilding, Ie, three liVing floors over parking, that would be 40-feet In height from grade
and therefore any Impact to the surrounding areas would be the same as If you
constructed the proposed bUilding
11 The overall tax base With respect to the properties Will be substantially
Increased
The good news IS that property values, whether the property be under ItS current
uses or under proposed uses, has substantially Increased over the last two-years on
Clearwater Beach. The bad news IS that In order accommodate the pnces that are In
fact bemg paid to acqUire and develop the property on the beach dictate a minimum
level of unIts or denSity In order to accommodate the pnce paid Surely, one can argue
that pnces may very well go down If people do not pay those pnces, however, as
eVidenced by a most recent $40,000,00000 transaction and the grandeur of that pnce It
IS not unlikely that pnces Will decrease substantially I would also add that those
owners under eXisting uses are beIng squashed by the ad valorem real estate taxes
being Imposed upon their lands and unfortunately are being "dnven out of bUSiness" by
the ever Increasing values placed upon their land by the County Tax Appraiser
This certainly IS not the best of all worlds when It comes to City planners and staff
who are deSIrous of a lower consumption of the land and a less bulkiness of bUildings,
however, It IS the natural result of not only the marketplace, but the success of Beach
by DeSign In attracting developments that are being constructed and enhanCing the
entire ambience and value of Clearwater Beach
Lastly, I have attached to thiS letter a number of letters from numerous
people who have reviewed the plans and speCIfications, most of whom live on the
JOHNSON, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, LLP
Al rORNloYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW
Community Development Board
November 4, 2004
Page 5
ORIGINAL
beach, some of which live very close of the property In questIon All of whom are very
much In favor of thIs plan
I respectfully request that you favorably consider the Applicant's application
under the Flexible Development Inflll Project and allow the plans to go forward
Yours very truly,
~~
Roger A Larson
~---~-- -j
- ~~~n\\pl~ l'r:\ ;
O ~~~U \1 b l, \
\~ j \ ~l
NOV A 2004 I L<>
~.~~
PLANNING & DEVElOPMENl
SERVICES
CITY OF CLE,.\RWATER
...
I\.
LaMia- Beach Clu~LLC
ORIGINAL
October 13, 2004
Pinellas County Taxing Authorities
315 Court Street
Clearwater, FL 33756
I
, 0 ~lC~~~~ \r \
\ 1\
L.,..../
PLANNING & CEVt=LOPMENl \
SERl/leES
CITY or ClE ~'1W^TEq
t___
Re: 15 Avalon Street
Clearwater Beach Rev
81k 7, N 635Ft of Lot 5
TO Whom It May Concern;
Please be advised that this property will be demolished. The hotel has not
been able to make a profit for a number of years.
A 50% Increase in taxes is outrageous and unheard of. Hopefully, the
zOning department will approve a bUildIng plan, so that you can get your
revenue back.
Best regards,
-I
David Antonlak
Manager
200 BRIGHTWATER DRIVE, #7, CLEARWATER BEACH, FLORIDA 33767
OFFICE (727) 466-0433, FAX (727) 466-6914
email: AFFLUEN1MEDIA@TAMPABAY.RR.COM
~ .::
~)
2004 NU Ill..l:: U I- t'HUt'U~ I:.U t'I1U I'" t: 111 1 11-\Ar::;:) fUll U
PROPOSED OR ADOPTED NO"" ~ VALOREM ASSESSMENTS
PINELLAS COUNTY T.....",~G AUTHORITIES
315 Court Street, Clearwater, Flonda 33756.5191
~AaCEL ~: Q~ I 29 ( l' / 16~62 I 001 / 0050
APPRAJ:SJU. ,lUl.EA' 52
2)
SEQ NUNDEB; 163.391
SI1'E ADDilES S .
15 AVllLCII ST
LEli/Uo DSSC ctEA8.WA1'E-a BDCl{ aEV
8LK ... II 53 5Pl' OE' LGT 5
04 TAX DJ.:S'I'lUCT
03 TAX oo;STlUc:'1"
...~..AUTO.~'-DXGIT 33167
Ll\la:R BEACH CLUB. LLC
200 PoBIGD1'tO.1'ER OR fI 7
~ F.L 3~1~7-2452
ORIGINAL
1..1111111111111.111111111111.111111111111I1111I11I111.1, IIIII
, TAXING ' YOU";>fI~n'r< YOU~ T,,'f$ '!)tIS YoM YC<.l" TAXes ".It I"'..A'I
AUTHORITY .. t4llCS ' F PI'OPO<:EIl BUt an IF NO OUOGfl
u.' YEAIl ~l " (:IW<G~ IS ~lI\lle !$l CH~M.3li IS w.o~ 1'1
COUlft'Y
comrn: ~ 3,1062,41 4.7~ 10 (,,360.30
Pur ~ COVlIC1.L 10 46 15 40 1'112
PVB[.J:C SCHOOLS.
aT S1:M'E u. 2,610.51 3,852 80 3,602 20
III LOCAl. 1l0ARD 1,222,49 1,832,60 1,687 00
HURl:Cl:PAL OR lGT\1
CLEAalm1'EB. 2,675 15 4,027 10 3,666 53
llM'EJ\ ~ DJ:5'rlUC'l'S
" SlI' E'L llA1'E1l. HGMT 196,23 212.09
295.10
M!lBLtAS MC1h1'E 186 00 2BO.II0 2$6 U.
DlI)t~ S~ DIST
~ HEXoE'loRE aD ,77." 568 1.9 520 81
'1'f\AIlSrl' Aln:H 293,8:1 1J46.39 4.02.57
VOTER APPROVED DEBT.
'ro'UJ, PB.OPERTY 'tAX
10:134.5&
16,078 58
14,182,39
.. COLUMN 1, COLUMN 2 CGlliMN 3
- , El8;- REVERSE. EliDE FOB "EXPLANATlOU
....oJl1lCt' VAlJ/E I$) ASSQ1SEO VAUJE ~
TQU~ PROPEllTV VAlUE
l.AST lEAfl 2llO3
465,000
465,000
YOUR PROPeRTY VAl.Uf:
ON JANl.lAR" " 2llO'I'
700,OOG
100,000
~o NOT PAY
THIS IS NOT A BILL
Oil
Clil'
The taxing authontles which levy propvrty taxes
against your property Will soon hold PUBUG
HEARINGS to adOpt budgets and tax rates for the
next year
The purpose of these PUBLIC HEARINGS IS to
receive opinIons from the general public and to
answer questions on the proposed tax change
and budget PRIOR TO TAKING FINAL ACTION
Eactl taxing authoTlty may AMEND OR AI-TER Its
proposals at the hearing
PLEASE READ THE SHADED BOX ON THE
ReVERSE SIDE
A puBLlC HE'ARING ON THE :pFlOPOSED
fAXES AND BUDGE! WlLLBE HELD
~ 464-~594 ~/7/114 6.30~ ~ FLOoa
COI1lt1'HO'll~, n5 COUK'I' S'I'. c:u:Nl.v.:n:a
'mL 588-6419 9f14/0t. 7 DOI!tlIlOARD 11M
J\DMYR BLDG, ;J 111 ft'H S'J: SW, ::r.JIRl;O
~ 562-4543 ~/2/04 S'OOPH 3ED FLOOR
Cl'1'~ BALL, 112 S OSCEoLA Aft f c:r.EJ\IllllM.'ER
TEL 13521 196-1211 '/14/04 5 O~
1501 U S. Br~Y 30~ ~. ~A
TEL ~i7-"43 9/9(04 5:30PM
66'8 68TH AVE tI, Ii'DJf:LLJ'oS PMlK
TEL 530-9921 9/1/04 5 aspy PS~ BOARD
ROOtli;"" Ufll!o"TlrsTlt,~~ -
o ~lC~~wrt Irr'~
;''-'1 11 I
U ... NOV. 4 2004 ! I !/
AX BILUl.8~€h~rBe:N'I!I~~~ t,
.-
E.>:BlI'TlON$ ($) . . ''-T,iY(,o.OLE VALUE (S)
I CITY C ClEAHWATER
o ~OO-
o
700,00U
l..PIYlN<ll AlJTIlORITY
PROPOSED ANDIOR ADOPTED NON-AD VAlOREM A.SSESSMENTS
~ OJ' ASSESSMeNT UNI~
lOA 1'E
.o$SESSMtN'l'
.11" \'OIJ Fen. tHe. M.o.I'UCeT VAWIl OJ! YOUR l'ROI'e.R1Y IS lNACCURo\Tl1 0 Po DOES NOT IIEFLEtT fAl1l MARKeT \IAUI~ ON JANUARY 1 2004 OR lI' YOU AAf I TOTAl.
ENfTT\,EO TO AN EKEMPnON THf,T IS NOT REF\.ECTEO ASOI/E CCNTA.CT YOUI\ PAOI'I!FI'N API'AAlSGR AT
(1271 i64-328. 315 COURl ~~, CLEAR~. PL 33156 2XEMPTION QVESTIOBS (121) 464-32~4
'IF TI-lE P~PEAlY .o.Pl'AAISER'S Ol'I'iC6 IS UNAllL..E TO REeOLVE THE MATTER M TO MAAAm' VAW," OR AN EXEMPTION YOU MAY FILE-A 1'".,,, ON !'OR AO.IUSNENl wml Tli~ v/W,je All.IUS'OdE)ll
SOARO F'lffillQN FORMS Afll! AVA!L.I&.E Fl":OM TIlE OOUNTT PAQPe!RTV A.PPRAlSEIl >>10 MUST BE 1'll..E0 ON O~ el;;~OIl~ :;.00 PM SEI!'tEHDE:R 10, 2004
. YOIJR A"IAl. TAll BILL !MY CONTAI [of NON-AO VAWREM ASSfSSMelf'S WHJClol MAlI fIlor BE REFIHCTE{} ON Tl1IS NOTICe- $LICIi AS AlSSESSt.lENTS fUR ROAOS FIRE, GAPiIlAGE UGH11NG
OMlWlGf, WATElI SEWEll OIl OTH Ell oov~e""",,, $eRVICSS ANt) FACtufl ES wt'llCH liIAY BE lJ:V\l!Q ev VOUIl COUNTY, CITY OR N!Y sPECIAL ~lmIICT
Nonhsile
&~ s~ 1ne~
ORIGINAL
CIVIL.
LAND PLANNING.
ENVIRONMENTAL ·
TRANSPORTATION ·
October 13, 2004
o ~(C~~W~ ro")
OCTI42D04 lL./):
L-"'" I
i
I
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENl
SERVICES
CITY OF CLE,~QWAT[R
City of Clearwater Planmng Department
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Flonda 33756
Attn Wayne Wells, AICP, Planner III
Re' FLD2004-08059 - 15 Avalon ~ Ambiance on White Sands
Condorruniums - NES Project #0441
Dear Wayne,
The following are responses to DRC comments:
General Engineering:
1 Sanitary sewer sefVIce has been changed to 6" in heu of 4";
2. Proposed fire hydrant has been relocated to nght-of-way area adjacent
to publIc parkmg lot to the west of the subject site meets distance
requirements See Sheet C4 1,
3 Proposed FDC has been relocated to nght-of-way area adjacent to
publIc parkmg lot to the west of the subject site and meets distance
requirements See Sheet C4 I,
4 A note regarding the domestIc water meter needmg to be field located
has been added to Sheet C4 1;
5. No portions of the buildmg project within aIr space of adjacent
properties;
6 Area east of ramp WIthm the structure is labeled as parking and
4 'walkway,
7 A proposed 4' wide Sidewalk is now shown within the right-of-way of
both Kendall and Avalon
Environmental:
1. Pnor to buIlding penmt, the archItect shall address any sea-turtle
frIendly light fixture Issues,
601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755
NESADMIN@MINDSPRING COM
NESTECH@MINDSPRING COM
727 ,443 2869 FAX 727 446 8036
I
[E~(E~~~ D')
OCT I 4 2004 \
ORIGINAL
PLANNING & DEVEl.OPMENl
SERViCES
Fire: CITY or CLEhRWATER
1 FDC has been relocated to meet dIstance reqUIrements See Sheet
C4l,
2 A note has been added to Sheet C4.1 acknowledglOg that "Where
underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, they shall be
installed, completed, and in service prior to construction as per NFP A
241
3. This item was deleted at DRC as the applicant IS not proposmg at this
tune to construct the prevIously proposed carports on the adjacent City
owned public parklOg lot. A separate applIcation may be made at a
later date.
4 We acknowledge that the DRC reVIew by Fire IS not an approval or
review of any construction plans or documents other than SIte work
Landscaping'
1 All areas avaIlable for landscapmg on this site have been landscaped and a
Comprehensive Landscape Program applIcation is included herein,
2 Where required, curbing and wheelstops are indIcated,
3 See Comprehensive Landscape Program apphcation Planters are bemg
proposed atop the second level of the garage portion of the structure which
wIll support vmes that WIll grow downward along the entire western wall
(1 st and 20d levels). These planters will be imgated Planters are shown
on architectural drawings and plant material is called out m the Legend on
the Landscape Plan, See Sheet L 1.1 and arclutectural drawings
Parks and Recreation:
See Site Data table on Sheet C1.1. Existing site currently maintains 15
overmght accommodation units and one (1) dwelling umt. Proposed
project will maintain 13 attached dwelling uruts;
Stormwater:
1. Rich Kelly of our office has had conversations with Bob Maran of the
Stonnwater Department. Bob is allowmg walls to be used III the pond
areas, pond area has been mcreased and Bob also stated that he would
allow plantings to be further into the pond than SiX mches Although
the DRC comments called for these changes prior to permittmg we
have addressed this Issue now
PLANNING & CEVELQPMENT
SERVICES
CITY OF CLE,.;"RWATER
Solid Waste:
1 In heu of providmg recycling containers the applicant has chosen to
pay mto the "recycling fund" This was discussed at DRC.
Traffic Engineering:
1 After DRC, the architect and myself met with Bennett Elbo of the
Traffic Engineenng Department and it was agreed to allow the
handicap space location as shown with the marked pathway leading
from the space to the lobby area See Sheet C3.1;
2 In addition to dlscussmg the handIcap space location Issue With Mr.
Elbo, we also discussed the parallel spaces along the ramp as shown
on C3 1. The spaces exceed the dimensional requirement and a curb IS
provided so that vehicles when parking can turn then wheels into the
curb to prevent rolling backward as you would along side an rnclimng
nght-of-way. This SItuation was supported by Mr Elbo,
3, Deleted as covered parkmg spaces on adjacent public parkmg lot are
no longer proposed as part of this applIcation,
4. See #3 above,
5 See #3 above,
6 See #3 above;
7. See #3 above;
8 See #3 above;
9. Sight tnangles are now shown correctly on Sheet C3 1 and Ll 1.
Stairwells have been adjusted/redesigned so they barely encroach mto
the viSibilIty tnangles 4-hour glass IS being proposed Wlthm the
portions of the walls leadmg to the garage that are located WithlO the
viSibility tnangles (see architectural drawmgs) These areas and
modIfications to the previously submitted plans should alleviate any
concerns regarding VISibility;
10 Deleted. See #3 above,
11 All items are hereby addressed
Planning:
<;p
J3.
J4
J.
~.
J7
)8
~
Al
)12
/13.
)14.
~15.
116.
07.
/18
~
lilJ OCT I 4 2004 '
t
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES
CITY OF CLEARWATER
~
Engineenng bar scale accurately reflects correct scale;
Letter of Authorization correctly identifies property owner of 15
Avalon as Lamer Beach Club LLC;
Public sidewalks now provided along both Avalon and Kendall;
Deleted as covered parking spaces in City owned public parkmg lot
are no longer proposed as a part pf thts application If the chent
deCIdes to pursue that option, a separate apphcatlOn may be made at a
later date;
VisIbIlity tnangles are now correctly shown on Sheets C3.1 and L 1.1 ;
Deleted See #4 above,
Any pOSSIble parking lot mtenor landscape areas are reflected on Sheet
C3 1 although all parking on site is contained within the enclosed
garage structure;
See architectural drawmgs for dimensions of balconies/terraces, from
buildIng edges,
Architect has addressed colors of buildlllg,
Description of Request has been revised to accurately reflect all
reductions, mcreases and appropriate critenon,
No sIgnage IS proposed at this tune Any eXlstmg sIgnage on site Will
be removed III its entrrety When the applicant is ready to proceed
with sIgnage a separate applIcation will be made to the City for reVIew
and approval,
Descripuon of Request ill Exhibit A has been reVIsed to accurately
reflect the munber of eXIsting units on site;
Narrative has been revised (paragraph #3 of Wntten Subtl11ttal
Requirements) to reflect actual proposed conditions WIthin the
visibility triangles;
See ReVIsed Exhibit A for Temunation of Status as a Non-Confonnity
Cnteria;
Acknowledged,
Full address for owner ofthe sender SIte now provIded in IDR
applicatIOn;
A copy of the recorded deed for the sender site is now included,
TDR applicatIOn now accurately reflects existing development on
receIver site;
The proposed height of the buIlding has been modified by means of
creatmg variolis heights (see Narrative for percentages) Urnt SIze
discrepancy was dIscussed at DRC and IS no longer an issue. Lot size
cannot be changed as no additional adjacent land is avatlable at this
tune. A 10' setback to the bUIlding IS proposed on all sides With the
exception of the western Side where a 0' setback to buIlding IS
requested. The side of the SIte directly abuts a CIty owned public
Ol~(cL'IV~ .0 II
OCT I 4 2004
120.
21
I
parking lot. The western sIde of the proposed structure wIll be
desIgned to provide permanent planters atop the 2nd level which will
host Creepmg fig vines that WIll cascade downward and completely
cover the western wall on 151 and 2nd levels,
Urnt SIzes are correctly indicated by the archItect on Sheet AI;
Architect to document that the proposed building WIll also meet the
Buildmg Code requirements for square footage of openings on each
side based on setbacks proposed
PLANNING & OEVELOPMEN1
SERVICES
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Please feel free to contact us WIth any questions related to tins project
ca~~0--~
Debra Ann Butler, ExecutIve Vice PreSident
o
C I T Y 0 F eLl,\. R W ATE R
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING
100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
WWW MYCLEARWATER COM
- ~ Clearwater
September 07,2004
Housh Ghovaee
601 Cleveland Street
SUIte 930
Clearwater, FI 33755
RE FLD2004-08059 -- 15 AVALON ST -- Letter of Camp leteness
Dear Housh Ghovaee
The Plannmg Staff has entered your applIcatIOn mto the Department's filIng system and assigned the
case number FLD2004-08059 After a prehrnmary revIew of the submitted documents, staff has
detemuned that the apphcatlOn IS Complete
The Development Rcvlew Commlttee (DRC) w111 reVIew the applIcatlOn for sufficiency on October
07,2004, m the Plannmg Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the
Mumclpal Services Bmldmg The bmldmg IS located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue m downtown
Clearwater Please call Sherry Watkms, Admmlstratlve Analyst, at 727-562-4582 no earlIcr than one
week pnor to the meetmg date for the approximate tIme that your case Will be revIewed You or your
representative (as applIcable) must be present to answer any questIOns that the DRC may have
regardmg your applIcation AddltlOnal comments may be generated by the DRC at the time of the
meetmg
If you have any questIOns, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4504 or
Wayne Wells@myclearwater com
Smcerely yours,
~Z~lI~'r!:~
Semor Planner
Leller of COlllplel~'WSS . Fl D2004-08059 - /5 A V A LON ~ 1
~~
.ttaa /Oli/(~
/iJt;n~ Ifje
Ambience of White Sands
Sequence of Events
April
. Approaehed EDC, Clearwater With Ambiance proJect With specific references to parking lot
. Eeonomlc development after checkmg wIth City attorney, plannmg, CIty manager, mfonned us that It would
Be a wm- wm SituatIOn for developer and City If developer funded landscapmg and cover the parkmg lot
. Developer has spent $200k non re-coverable to date
May & June
. Several meetmgs wi Wayne Wells Chip Gerlock, & Lisa Fierce took place with references to Set Backs, Roof
Covenng, DenSity, & DeSign etc, With developer and hiS team Cmdy Tarpam was unavailable
. Some progress was made, however developer felt that drreetton from City planning dept was not crystal clear
Hence a meetmg wi City manager Bill Home was requested by Uday Lele
July- Aug
. City manager Bill Home kmdly consented to the meetmg and at the same tIme, City offiCials, Wayne Wells
LIsa Fierce and Keytn Gamet participated We were adVIsed that the height barometer would be of the
LaRtsa project
. A good deSign was necessary to receive CIty support
. Lisa Fierce Issued a letter dated Aug 3 2004 mformmg our attorney that we could develop] 2 uruts, plus I
TDR
. After Implementmg all these suggestIOns from the ]4 different elty dept A superlative deSign was submitted
m a ttmely fashIOn
October
. 3 days before DRC a wotten set of comments was receIVed
. At ORC meeting the height Issue was made
. After thiS we met With Gary, asst elty manager and Cmdy Tarpam havmg addressmg all the Issues raIsed m
the ORe comments except the zero set back
. A week later we resubmitted the apphcatton havmg addressed all the Issues except the zero lot hne
. We are now mformed that the cIty IS apprehenSive of 13 umts on thiS property
. Even though there are ] 5 motel SUItes and one smgle reSidence on extremely old eXlstmg property
. We beheve that Lisa Fierce letter dated on Aug 3 2004 supports and c1anfies the Issue of denSity
. The parkmg lot Issue IS now bemg asked to be separated from the apphcatIon ThiS IS out of the blue as we
would not have comnntted to a proJect WIthout approval as a complete package Request City Manager
mterventton
. We look forward to the City supportmg the proJect
.- ,....
_/p VI, 0;'
~
~
Cljt1 .. ' . ;j/ ~ (;; m /1 r. i?!!2ifJii;!7n;
, ~j]CtL ~ ~t>>
~~~.:< ~p7~ -0J?-~~~ff
a ...... _ /; &~
/W(J<- uJ~ - 7h9MJ W-~ (/
0I71it- ft)}tl~h~ ~ ~~
~~
--
Iii
'rhl~$.W/;/~~
~I
::' ~ r?J tRI~ 4
/toP ~~)::j1fvttt&~i:;~::?~
tJh/-~n:::::;~~@n
-~i~~~
--~ 1?2 /7lH; b~
1t;~~ '-?/J~~ r-;; YJA Ad'L/7~_ .II' .d~4.1___ . r
- ~~ - ~'K/cr7~ /,U'rr~ /{A;/'rvrr",~
A~IE - .
-- ;);.', . - ~
~ ~ - 'I'7#lor#-;(A/- uL at(.
Cfl1:J Jv~ /r Mu)@lJ57z;~
~ h.--~ Vo~ ~/#b/11.?#t-;:;~
CIt:L-1.I~Vi-I!fQ/~~-~~ &
IlL - M/~ .I1Jr~. ,iJt,thZ&f:-
III
;2 TIMES "/\TUESDAY. ;.IOVEMBEf'j-" ?n04 CLW . f'1 tJ Jt'11 'J 1 \_.Jl ~
EDITO-RI-;~---~' ~-----=::::r- ,:---------~llETTE~;1
Proposal provides chance Tarpol
to enforce beach's standards
Clearwater Beach is being redeveloped at a Today the Old F10rida District has a mix of tiny
faster pace than perhaps even the most motels, single-family homes, a few small
detennined optimist would have imagined 10 condominium buildings and a handful of retail
years ago. shops. Most of the buildings in the area are one ot
New buildings are sprouting, investors are two stories tall. "Beach by Design:' states that in
prowling the beach looking for opportunities, the the future, the Old F10rida District should
city's Planning Departm:ent is busy reviewing continue to be a low- to mid-rise neighborhood,
applications for new projects, and the agenda of developed primarily with new or renovated
the Clearwater Community Development Board, single-family homes and townhomes.
which approves development plans, gets longer Aqua Sun Development has contracted to buy
with every meeting. two very small motels and a single-family home on
Since city officials worked hard to create an Avalon and Kendall streets, both streets that dead
environment on the beach that would spur end at the gulf. Aqua Sun wants to tear down the
interest among developers, thete is a fair amount old structures and replace them with a 13-unit
of relief and back-slapping in City Hall these days. condominium building.
But will city offici;!!sbe able to take pride in the That doesn't sound too unusual until you
result?' examine the details. The building would be 69.5
When a propertY gets redeveloped, everyone feet tall above base flood level - closer to 75 feet
hopes the new construction will look better than tall from ground level. It would literally tower over
what it replaced. However, another goal of nearby one-story homes.
redevelopment is to correct development patterns It would be perched on a piece ofland that is a
that existed at the time of original construction mere .299 acres - less land than is required for
. that have, in hindsight, proven problematic. For the construction of one single-family home in the
example, in many older neighborhoods in urban city's low-density residential districts.
areas, houses were built on small lots and close To get so many units on such a small piece of
together, without required setbacks. Such land, Aq. ua Sun is asking for zero setbacks, for a
construction presents a host of modern-day h . h' d < th . h build' th
problems, including lack of open space, conflicts . elg t vanance an lor e ng t to. mto e
between properly owners, difficulty in servicing or normal traffic visibility triangles.
replacing utilities and, eventually, problems in Because motorists coming out of the ground
redeveloping the area. floor parking garag~and approaching on nearby
These days, land development codes adopted streets would be hampered in their ability to see
by local governments not only have ininimum lot around the bu,ijding, Aqua Sun actually proposes
size and setback provisions, but also address to put mirroi~'oJ1thebiriIding and paint warnings
height, open space, landscaping, utility easements on.the sti"~~f~litfa4e~ j~~;\.;,~;,~v..
de~S;;~~~fl~~~I~oc6=~ti~~~e .g:al. is to .,. sid;gf~~"b~dhi~~~~~%r;'~~1~1;~~~;
Clearwater nee.dsto keep that go;!! 1;11!1i1l1d as from planterb~x.esa~9h,ed,t?; t~~,,:@!;; :'>,"" '.
Clearwater Beach IS redeveloped. OffiCIals can . The Old{F;lon~aJ)lsl1':ic;tpe"e,!iw~senVls19m,d\..
creat~ prob.1ems for gel1,etatio?s of Sity' ~e~iderits if as a Iieigh?ot~O<id.,<?f ~eV~ri'l;toty c?ndo~~",", '.
they, m theIr eagerness, make poor deCISIOns towers built virtually lot lme to,lot,Iine, ~thlitt1e
today. One case on the agenda at today's . open spaee, landscaping or attention to Vlew .
Conununity Development Board meeting corridor. Is this the kind of "redevelopment" .
provides a perfect example.' . future generations will enjoy seeing in that section
Aqua Sun Development LLc is contracting to of Clearwater Beach, or will it be recognized asa,
purchase land along the Gi1lfof Mexico on the mistake that must be cOrrected in a future wave of
north end of the island between the Rockaway beach redevelopment?
parking lot and Acacia Street, which is generally The city planning staff fortunately recognized
regarded as the start of the single-family the deficiencies in Aqua Sun's proposal and has:-
residential portion of the island. That area is called recommended denial. The Community
the Old F10rida District in "Beach by Design," the Development Board hopefully \vill follov' their
city's redevelopment plan for Clearwater Beach. lead.
Re: Tarpoll 01
editorial, Nov. 14 .
Perhaps after I
actions in Sunday ·
to the attention ( I
they are perceiVE ,
ests, disregard in: I
and the developn i
Why would 0 ,
sponsible manm I
contribute to tho :
Tarpon Avenue? I
magnitude accer
developer? Our
foresight and inti
will affect Tarpon
income but forev.
erty.
I strongly dis,
mise this propel
legacy and devel,
with the presenc.
I would also Sl
and city commiss
they will be perce I
of our town. Th,
commission wa5
gains than the wi! .
Kl
Arrival of Wal !
Re: Proposed :
clote River in Tar
The homeoW!
ing citizens who
For us, this is not .
where our childn
come after a han
anivaI of a Wal- ,
would be traffic, [ i
ness.
Traffic: Traffi(
very congested I
~ :g,!ing to change I
".',);n the mpming i:
'soutli, we Can ha,
. During everting h,
of the drivers goi:
then thread very
. .need to go south. I
. youaddaWal-Ma'
; c)1aos during the I
Yes, it ~II get wo I
Noise: The 'I .
hours, and the riv, '
invested a subst .
homes, and we wa .
we have. Right nl :
I
CDB Meetmg Date
Case Numbers
Agenda Hem
Owners
Appltcant
Rep resen tat I ve
Address
~)>~
ORIGINAL
November 16, 2004
FLD 2 004-080 5 9lTD R2 004-0800 8
Fl
Lamer Beach Club LLC. Allan J Crooker and McSmlth lnc
Aqua Sun Development, LLC
Mr Housh Ghovaee, Northslde Engmeenng ServIces, Inc
15 -1 7 Avalon Street and I 6 Kendall Street
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
CENERAL INFORMATION:
REQUEST:
(1 ) T enn matlOn of Status of N oncon[ OImi ty for densl ty (15
overnight accommodatIon umts - to be converted to 11 dwellIng
umts), under the provIsIons of SectIOn 6-109, (2) Flexible
Development approval to perunt a total of 13 attached dwelhngs In
the MedIUm High DensIty ResIdential (MHDR) Dlstnct and Tounst
(T) Dlstnct With reductIons to lot area m the MHDR Dlstnct from
15,000 square feet to 8,700 square feet and 111 the T D IS tn ct from
10,000 square feet to 4,350 square feet, reductIOns to lot width 111 the
MHDR DIstnct from 150 feet to 100 feet and m the T Dlstnct [rom
100 feet to 50 feet, reductIOns to the front (north along Avalon Street
- MHDR Dlstnct) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet (to bUlldl11g) and
from 25 feet to zero feet (to dumpster stagl11g pad), a reductlOn to the
side (west - MHDR Dlstnct) from 10 feet to zero feet (to bUlldmg), a
red uctIOn to the rear (south ~ MHD R D I stn ct) from 1 5 feet to I 0 feet
(to bUlldmg), a reductIOn to the front (south along Kendall Street - T
Dlstnct) from 15 feet to 10 feet (to bUl1dmg), a reductlon to the SIde
(west - T DIstnct) from 10 feet to zero feet (to bUlldmg), dl1l11CreaSC
to bUlldl11g height III the MHDR Dlstnct from 30 feet and m the T
Dlstnct from 35 feet to 69 5 feet (to roof deck) WIth penmeter
parapets of 3 67 feet (from roof deck) and decoratIve roof structures
of 10 1 feet (from roof deck) and to permIt a bUlldmg wlthm the
VISIbilIty tnangles, as a ReSidentIal lnfill Project m the MHDR
DIstnct and as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project m the
T Distnct, under the provIsIOns of SectIOns 2-404 F and 2-803 C, (3)
Reductlon to the front penmeter buffer along Avalon Street III the
MHDR Dlstnct from 10 feet to zero feet (to dumpster stagmg pad)
and a reductlOn to the SIde (west) landscape buffer In the MHDR
Dlstnct from 10 feet to zero feet (to bUlldmg), as a ComprehensIve
Landscape Plan, under the provIsIons of SectIOn 3-1202 G, and (4)
Staff Report - Commumty Deve lopmenl Board - November ] 6, 2004
Case FLD2004-08059/TDR2004-08008 - Page I of 13
EXISTING ZONING/
LAND USE:
PROPERTY SIZE:
PROPERTY USE:
ADJACENT ZONING/
LAND USES
CHARACTER OF THE
IMMEDIATE VICINITY:
Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2004-08008) of one dwelling
umt to this site from 321 Coronado Dnve, under the proVISIOns of
SectIOn 4-1402
MedIUm High Density ResldentJaI (MHDR) Dlstnct and Tounst (T)
Dlstnct, ReSIdential FaCilities High (RFH) Category
0299 acres
Current Use Overmght accommodatIOns and detached dwellmg
Proposed Use Attached dwelhngs (13 umts - condommmm)
North Open Space/RecreatIOn DIstrict, City parkmg lot
East MedIUm High DensIty ReSidential and TOUrist Dlstncts,
Attached dwellmgs, overnlght accommodatIOn uses and restaurant
South Tounst Dlstnct, Overnight accommodatIon use and
restaurant
West Open SpacelReereahon DIstnct, City parkmg lot and beach
The surroundmg area IS a mIxture of attached dwellIngs
(condommlUm), detached dwellmgs and overnight accommodation
uses Commercial uses are to the south and along Mandalay
Avenue A CIty parkmg lot and the beach ]S to the west
ANAL YSIS:
Site Location and EXisting Conditions: The 0 299 acres IS located between Avalon Street and
Kendall Street, approXimately 200 feet west of Mandalay Avenue The site has 100 feet of
flOntage on Avalon Street (north) and 50 feet of frontage on Kendall Street (south) The proposed
sIte IS composed of three parcels
The parcel at 15 Avalon Street IS zoned Medium High Densl ty ReSldentlal (MHDR) DIS111ct and IS
currently developed With d noncon[onnll1g, five~unIt overnight accommodation use The parcel at
17 Avalon Street IS zoned MHDR D]stnct and]s currently developed With one detached dwelling
The parcel at 16 Kendall Street IS zoned TOUrIst (T) Dlstnct and IS currently developed With a
noncon[ornung, IO-unIt ovenught accommodatIon use All eXlstll1g Improvements are planned to
be demolished While there IS some eXIstmg on-SIte parkll1g, there IS eXlstmg parkll1g that
straddles the front property lme along Avalon Street (partIally on-SIte and partially wIthm the
nght~of-way) There are CIty metered parkmg lots to the west and north (across Avalon Street) of
the subject property
The Palm PavilIOn restaurant and overnight accommodatIon use IS to the south across Kendall
Street Development along Mandalay Avenue to the east Il1cludes retail, restaurant, automobile
S tuff Report - Commumty Development Board - November 16, 2004
Case FLD2004-08059/TDR2004-08008 - Page 2 of 13
service statiOn, overnight accommodation and attached dwellmg uses Overnight accommodation
and attached dwelling uses are east of the subject property
Proposal: The proposal Includes constructmg 13 attached dwelhngs (condommlUms) m a
bluldmg with SIX hvmg floors over two levels of parkll1g The proposal mcludes an lI1crease to the
bUlldmg heIght from 30 feet (MHDR DistrIct) and 35 feet (T Dlstnct) to 69 5 feet from the Base
Flood Elevation (BFE) to the highest roof deck The apphcant has submitted mformatIon that the
highest roof deck at 695 feet accounts for S4 5 percent of the total roof area AddItIOnal
mfonnatlOn submitted by the applicant mdlcates other roof levels of the proposed buIidmg are
58 6 feet, accountmg for 24 percent of the total roof area, 39 2 feet (11 5 percent) and 29 6 feel (10
percent) Stdff has not been able to venfy the 58 6-foot height, nor percentages of the total roof
area
Staff has calculated the heIghts and percentages as follows (Note ProJectIons above any roof,
SLlch as stall towel s, elevator towers, mechamcal rooms or gazebos have been counted as part of
Ihe roof level It projects above, which ]S the same baSIS used for the percentages calculated for the
"LdR]sa" project at 650 Bay Esp]anade)
MaIn roof 69 5 feet above BFE, 80 57 percent of total roof area
Sixth Leve] 43 67 feet above BFE, not the 392 feet Indicated (actually Level 65 - pool
deck leve], 1033 percent of total roof area
Fifth Level 29 5 feet above BFE, 9 1 percent of tot a] roof area
The roof level the apphcdnt mdlcates dt 58 6 feet above BFE IS actually the terraces for the
penthouse Levcl 8, whIch IS covered by the mam roof Staff has not counted this as a roof, Just as
the applIcant has not countcd any other terrace on any other lcvel as a roof, and was SimIlarly
dIscounted on the "LaRlsd" project
Two blocks to the north on the north Side of G]endale Street and adjacent to undeveloped Beach
Dnve IS a resldentJal condommlUm bUlldmg of five hVll1g floors over ground level parking The
Co lony Surf CondommlUm bUlldmg on the north Side of Cambna Street IS three hvmg floors over
ground level parkmg (approximately 35 feet m height [from BFE to roof deck]) Under
constructIon on the north Side of Somerset Street ]s a project by the same developers as thIs
pIOPOSdl (Chalets on White Sands reSidentIal condommlUms) wIth five IIvmg floors over ground
level parkmg at a height of 56 feet to the roof deck (FLD2002-09031, approved by the CDB on
November 19,2002) Between Somerset and Cambna Street IS a project (Chateau on Whlte Sands
res]dentlal condommlUl11s) approved by the CDB, but not yet under constructIon, m a buildmg of
five hvmg floors over two floors of parkmg at an approved height of 61 66 feet to the roof deck
(FLD2004-0 1 002/TDR2004-01006, approved by the CDB on June 15,2004)
The sIte IS localed wlthm the "Old FlorIda Dlstnct" of Beach by DeSIgn and has been deSIgnated
for multi-family townhomes and condomll1lUms of low to mid-rIse bUlldmg heights The
uTImedJate VICInity IS almost entIrely composed of attached dwellIngs and small motels of one to
two-story Bulldmg styles generally resemble architecture from the 1950's and appear to have been
progresslve]yexpanded The proposed height of thIS bmldmg at 69 5 feet to the roof deck may be
Staff Report - Commufil ty Development Board - November 16, 2004
Case FLD2004-08059/TDRZOQ4-08008 - Page 3 of 13
,~
viewed as be10g consIstent With building heIghts approved by the CDS 10 the "Old Flonda
Dlstnct," and IS similar to that approved for the "LaRlsa" project at 650 Bay Esplanade, but also
must be viewed 10 concert wIth other provIsIOns ofthls proposal as to acceptabIllty
Staff IS usmg the "LaRIsa" project as a benchmark for this area, where that project's highest roof
deck was approved at 69 5 feet above the BFE Ime (although only accountmg for 57 percent of the
total roof - other roof decks were at 58 5 feet above BFE [17 5 percent], 48 feet above BFE [18 1
pel cent] and 37 5 feet above BFE [74 percent]) Whlie thiS proposal's highest roof deck IS the
same 695 feet above BFE, Its percentage IS much higher (80% to 57%) than that of "LaRlsa " The
applicant's attorney asserts that the Impact of a 40-foot tall building would have the same Impacts
as the proposed bmldmg height Staff disagrees with thiS assertIon and prefers a bmldmg 40 to 50
feet m height
The proposal 10cludes a request to Il1crease the helght of penmeter parapets around the edge of the
roof deck an additIOnal 3 67 feet (from roof deck), where the Code penmtted maximum IS 30-
ll1ches TIns mClease may be Viewed as makmg the parapets proportlOnalm respect to the heIght
of the bUildIng and to aid In the screenmg of the rooftop air conditIonIng umts Addltlonally, the
proposal mcludes a request to ll1crease the buIidmg height another 10 1 feet (from roof deck) for
decoratIve roof structures on the north Side of the bUlldll1g
The proposal ll1cludes a request to Termmate the Status of the Nonconfonmty for the
nonconfonmng denSIty related to the two overnIght accommodation uses on the property Based
on current Land Use Category denSity hm]tatlOI1S of 40 umts/rooms per acre for overnight
accommodation uses, or 30 dwellmg umts per acre for rcsldent131 uses, the overall subject site may
be developed with a maximum of 11 overnight accommodation umts/rooms or a maXImum of
eight dwellmg umts These two overnight accommodation uses currently total 15 overnight
umtslrooms The applicant ]S requestmg to term mate the nonconformmg denSIty m order to
convert the 15 overnlght umts/rooms to 11 dwelling Ul1lts, based on the 40/30 conversion factor
The applicant IS ach]evll1g the proposed number of dwellIng umts for thIS property by addmg In the
ex]stmg one dwellmg umt at 17 Avalon Street and addmg 111 one dwelling umt by the Transfer of
DenSIty Rights Under the Tenmnatlon of Status of NonconformIty proVISIOns, there are [our
reqUired Improvements
Installation of penmeter buffers Penmeter buffers are not reqUIred m the Tounst Dlstnct
(southern portion of the property) On the northern portIOn of the property zoned MHDR
Dlstnct, the apphcant IS provldmg the reqlllred 10-foot Wide landscape buffers along
Avalon Street (with the exceptlOn of the dumpster stagmg area) and the east and south
Sides of the property The applicant IS requestmg to reduce the landscape buffer along the
west Side of the property [rom 10 feet to zero feet, which IS adjacent to a City parkmg lot
2 Improvement of off-street parkll1g lots The apphcant IS removmg all eXlstmg
Improvements and IS provldmg parkmg that meets Code provIsions m the two levels of the
parkmg garage
3 Removal of nonconformll1g signs, outdoor lIghtll1g or other accessory structures The
applicant IS remOVing all eXlstll1g Improvements Any future Slgnage Will need to meet
current Code provIsiOns
S laff Report - Community Development Board - November 16, 2004
Case FLD2004-08059/TDR2004-08008 - Page 4 of 13
4 Use of Comprehensive Sign Program and Comprehensive Landscape Programs to satisfy
reqUIrements At this tIme there ]S no need for a Comprehensive Sign Program, as there
are no signs proposed The applicant has submItted a ComprehensIve Landscape Program
to satisfy the requested reductIOn to the lO-foot landscape buffer reqUirement along the
west Side of the property (see discussIOn later m this Staff Report relatmg to landscape
buffcr reduction)
Staffs concern relative to the tenmnatIon of the nonconfonTImg density IS the net mcrease of four
dwelling umts proposed to be constructed on this small piece of property This concern must also
be revIewed III light of the other reductions or mcreases of this proposal discussed III thIS Staff
Report
ReductIOns to lot area and lot Width for attached dwellings are part of this proposal The request
Includes a rcduct]on III the MHDR D]stnct from 15,000 square feet to 8,700 square feet and III the
T Dlstnct from 10,000 square feet to 4,350 square feet The proposal also IIlcludes reductions to
the lot Width m the MHDR D]stnct from 150 feet to 100 feet and III the T Dlstnct from 100 feet to
50 feet The reductIOns to lot area amount to a 42 percent reductIOn m the MHDR Dlstnct and a
565 percent reductIOn m the T D]stnct Staff has consistently advised the applicant on thIs
proposal that the land area ]S too small and needs to be combmed WIth adjacent property to
properly desIgn a project that complles With the objectives of Beach by DeSIgn and more closely
compiles With the reqUIrements of the Community Development Code The apphcant's attorney
opmes that the lot sIze cannot be solved Staff dIsagrees, III that the development on these three
small lots ]S premature and should be enveloped IIlto a larger plOperty where deSIgn compromIses
aJ e not so extreme The lot Width IS a contnbutmg factor to thiS property bemg too small, forcmg a
des 1 gn thdt req u Ires excessl ve com proml ses
WIth the exceptIOn of the LaR]sa II project at 669 Bay Esplanade (FLD2004-030 18, approved by
the CDB on October 19, 2004), all other projects approved 111 the Old Flonda Dlstnet have greatly
exceeded the lot area and lot wIdth reqUIrements The shape of the property also contnbutes to
deslgI1 Issues requmng excessIve compromIses and does not promote redevelopment that IS III
scale With the character and function ofClearwater Beach
The lequest IS bemg processed dS a Residential 1nfi11 Project 111 the MHDR DistrIct and as a
ComprehenSive Infill Redevelopment ProJcct m the T DIstnct due to the heIght mcrcase and
sctback reductIons bemg requested to the bUlld1l1g, pavement and dumpster stagmg area The
proposal mcludes reductIons to the front (north along Avalon Street - MHDR Dlstnct) setback
from 25 feet to 10 feet (to bulldmg) and from 25 feet to zero feet (to dumpster stagmg pad), a
reductIOn to the SIde (west - MHDR D]stnct) from 10 feet to zero feet (to bmldmg), a reduction to
the rear (south - MHDR DIStflct) from 15 feet to 10 feet (to bUlldmg), a reductIon to the front
(south along Kendall Street - T Dlstnct) from 15 feet to 10 feet (to bmldmg) and a reduction to the
slde (west - T DIStflct) from 10 feet to zero feet (to bmldmg)
Staff acknowledges that the reductIOns to the front setbacks from Avalon and Kendall Streets are
slnlllar to those reductIOns approved for the projects at 14 Somerset Street (FLD2002-09031,
approved by the COB on November 19, 2002) and 15 - 17 Somerset Street and 16 Cambna Street
Staff Report - COnunUllIty Development Board - November 16,2004
Case FLD2004-08059rrDR2004~08008 - Page 5 of 13
(FL02004-01002/TDR2004-01006, approved by the COB on June 15, 2004) However, a mam
difference with this proposal IS the zero setback requested on the west side of the property Wlnle
thIs IS a City parking lot, It should not be d]seounted as not be10g affected The applicant's
attorney 10 a letter dated November 4, 2004, asserts "all ma10tenance of the bUlldmg and
landscapmg proposed for the bUlldmg can be accomphshed mSlde the lot lines wIthout use of the
City owned property to the west" At a zero setback, Staff IS unclear how the buIldmg can be
mall1tamed (such as painting) without overhangmg the City's property The applicant proposes
creeping fig vines cascading from Level 3 downward along the garage wall facmg the CIty
property All of the cascadmg vmes will be over the CIty property, where eventually ]t could affect
the CIty's use of ItS property Such an exceSSlVe reductIon wIll set an unnecessary precedent for
thls area, whIch could lead to other simIlar requests BUlldlllg Code provISIons also restnct the
amount of opel1lngs m the exterIor wall based on how close the bUlldll1g IS to the lot Ime At a
zero setback there can be no openmgs, whereas at between three to 10 feet only 10 percent
opemngs are allowed and 20 percent above 10-foot setback The applicant has md]cated on the
bUlldll1g elevatIOns how the proposal meets these Bulldll1g Code restnctIons
The site today has some eXlstmg on-sIte parkll1g spaces, but there ]S eXlstll1g parkmg that straddles
the front property 11I1e along Avalon Street (partially on-Sl te and partIally wlthll1 the nght-of-way)
The applicant has adVised that some guests utilize parkmg spaces on the adJacent CIty parkmg lot
to the west and/or to the north The proposal IS to elimmate all parkmg wIthm the nght-of-way and
provIde 24 parking spaces on-site (Code reqUlrement ]5 1 5 spaces per Ul1lt or 20 spaces, proposal
IS at 1 846 spaces per UI1lt) Parkmg will be proVided on two levels and will be fully screened from
View by soild walls on both levels ofparkmg A gated dnveway on Avalon Street will access the
first level of paIk10g of 10 spaces The blllldmg and sIte plans submItted for the CDB lI1dIcate
what appeals to be stacked parkmg on the west Side of the first level of parkmg, which IS not
allowed by Code and has not been requested as part of tIns proposal Staff has not discussed such
a request with the applicant, nor was It part of the Development ReView CommIttee
consideratIOns A gated drIveway on Kendall Street will access the second level of parkll1g of 14
spaces
SIdewalks will be constructed wlthm the nghts-of-way of both Avalon and Kendall Streets for
pedestnan safety, where no Sidewalks presently eXIst The northern stairwell presently IS shown to
empty lI1to the Pdrkmg gdrdge (a more hazardous area), not meetll1g Fire and BUlldmg Code
reqUirements Should the CDB approve thiS proposal, the applicant Will need to redeSign thiS
northern stamvell to proVIde an access]ble path to the outSIde of the bUlldll1g to meet the Fire and
BUlldmg Code prOVISIons
As indicated previously, the proposed bUlldll1g wJ!l have SIX !Ivlllg floors, with varymg numbers of
Ul1lts per Door Levels 3 and 4 are proposed with three umts each, wIth Ul1lts ranglllg between
2,141 and 2,702 square feet ofllvmg area Levels 5 and 6 are proposed wIth two umts, with 2,505
or 2,702 square feet of hvmg area Level 5 also proVides a clubroom on the east Side of the
bluldmg Level 6 ]S also proposed wIth a pool, which IS up a half-level accessed by stairs and a
handIcap chaIr 11ft (Level 6 5) Level 7 IS proposed with two umts, wIth 2,702 or 2,825 square feet
of hvmg area The top floor (Level 8) ]5 a sll1gle penthouse of 4,847 square feet of livmg area
Most Units will have a westerly onentatiOl1, with the exceptIon of two umts on the Levels 3 and 4
Staff Report - Commulll ty Development Board - November 16, 2004
Case FLD2004-08059fTDRl004-08008 - Page 6 of 13
on the eastern side of the bUlldIng Elevators from a lobby In the center of the bUIlding will access
Units Stall wells are located on the northern, center and southern portions of the bUlldmg
Concurrent with the front setback reductlOl1S m this proposal IS the reductIon to the front landscape
buffer along Avalon Street 111 the MHDR DlStnct from 10 feet to zero feet (to dumpster staging
pad) and a reductlon to the sIde (west) landscape buffer 111 the MHDR D]stnct from 10 feet to zero
feet (to bulidmg) The applicant acknowledges the lImItatIon or lack of area for landscaping due to
the proposed site design The reductIon on the west sIde IS severe and cannot be made up
elsewhere on-site to mItIgate the starkness created on the west side, especially WIth a blank wall
for the first two floors The public will have to view thiS for qUite some tIme, as Vines wIll take
some time to matUle to plovlde theIr cascadmg effect envIsIoned by the applicant The reductions
proposed will not be 111 compltance with the cntena for the ComprehenSive Landscape Program
that requires the landscape design, character, location and/or matenals to be demonstrably more
attractive than landscapmg otherwIse permitted With the front setbacks proposed, the bUlldIng's
structural column on the east side and a portIon of the staIrwell wall will be w]thm the VISibilIty
tnangles at the Avalon Street driveway (as well as the west sIde of the bUlldmg adJacent to Kendall
Street) While mdlcated on the first level architectural plans With openmgs In the walls to proVIde
views through It for VISibIlity purposes, the bUlldmg elevations do not mdlcate such
The applicant IS not proposll1g any sIgnage at thIs tIme The applicant's attorney mdIcates that
ledevelopment of thIS property IS mev]table, due to nsmg property values resultmg 1I1 mcreased
tdxes Staff agIees With these assertIons, however, thIs marketplace Circumstance should not
abrogate appropnate development on appropnately slzed parcels more closely meetmg Code
provls]ons
ThiS proposal mcludes the Transfer of Development R]ghts of one Ul1lt to thiS site from 321
Coronado Dnve (where a maximum of four umts are penmtted), where only one dwelling umt
l11dY be transferred to thiS site under the prOV]Slons of Section 4-1402 WhIle 111 comphance With
the maximum number of Ul1lts able to be transferred to the subJect Site, thIs portion of the request
must also be reviewed In light of the other reductIOns or mcreases of thIS proposal discussed m thiS
Staff Report The mcrease by one additional Ul1lt further exacerbates Staffs concern of
overbUlldIng thiS SIte With too many umts, on too lIttle land With too little setbacks The proposal
]S not In comphanee With the cntena of Section 4-1403, as It will not appropnately upgrade the
ImmedIate VIcmlty nor create a deSign that enhances the form and functIon of the commumty
character for the Immediate vlclmty
Stdff does not support thiS proposal for the mynad of reasons enumerated above ThiS proJect ]S
premature, as the site should be enveloped mto a larger parcel to appropnately deSIgn a proJect
complYing, or more closely complymg, With Code provlslOns and the VISIOn of Beach by DeSIgn
There are l11dny fdcets embraced m Staffs recommendatIOn that are related and does not rely on
one Issue the lot area of the property, the lot wIdth of the property, the use of the provls]on of
TermmatlOn of Status of Nonconforn1Ity to exceed the number of umts appropnate for the
property, the use of the Transfer of Development Rights to further exacerbate the proposed number
of dwellmg Ul1lts, the heIght and percentage of total roof area of the proposed bUlldmg, proposed
setbaeks, lack of adequate landscape area to mitIgate the effects of the sIte deSign, and the
Staff Report - Community Development Board - November 16, 2004
Clse FLD2004-08059/TDR2004-08008 - Page 7 of 13
proposed mass and scale of the bUlldll1g The proposal IS not compatible with surroundll1g
propertIes, due to these Issues The redevelopment of thIs site will not Improve the appearance of
thlS site and the surroundll1g area All apphcable Code reqUirements and cntena mcludll1g, but not
IIITIl ted to, General ApphcabIlity cntena (SectIOn 3-913), ResIdential Infi II ProJ ect cntena (Scctlon
2-404 F) and Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment ProJect cntena (SectIOn 2-803 C) have not
been met
Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstandmg enforcement Issues associated WIth thIs
slte
S talT Report - Comrn!-lmty Development Board - November 16, 2004
Case FLD2004-08059/TDR2004-08008 - Page 8 of 13
COMPLIANCE \VITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: (Sections 2-404.F and 2-803.C):
STANDARD PROPOSED CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT
MAXIMUM 13 dwelhng 1111l ts (a) X*
DENSITY (30
dwelling units per
acre) (eigh t d\\'elling
Ulllts maximum)
IMPERVIOUS 084 X
SURFACE RATIO
(ISR) (0.85 maximum
- MHDR; 0 95 ~ T)
LOT AREt\ (For 0299 acres, 13,050 square feet X*
attached dwellings
15,000 sq feet
minimum - MHDR;
1 0,000 sq feet
mmlmum - T)
LOT WIDTH (For North ~ 00 feet (MHDR) X*
attached dwellings: South 50 feet (T)
150 feet mmlmum -
MHDR; 100 feet - T)
FRONT SETBACK North 10 feet (to bUlldmg), zero feet X*
(15-25 feet - MHD R; (to dumpster staglllg area),
0-15 feet - T) South 10 feet (to bUlldmg)
REAR SETBACK 10 feet (MHDR) X*
(l 0-15 feet - MI-IDR;
10-20 feet - T)
SIDE SETBACK East 10 feet (to bUlldmg) (MHDR & X*
(0-10 feet - MHDR; 0- T)
10 feet - T) West zero feet (to bUlldmg) (MHDR
& T)
HEIGHT (For 69 5 feet (to roof deck) wIth penmeter X*
attached dwellings: parapets of 3 67 feet (from roof deck)
30-50 feet maxlmum- and decoratJ ve roo f structures 0 f 1 0 1
MHDR; 35-100 feet- feet (from roof deck)
T)
PARKING SPACES 24 spaces (1 85 spaces per umt) X
(l.5 spaces per Ulllt -
attached dwellings; 20
spaces required)
(a) Includes the TelmmatIOn of Status of Nonconformity for 15 eXlstmg overnight accommodatIOn rooms,
beIng converted to attached dwelhngs at a 40/30 raho) for 11 umts, plus thc one eXlstmg detached
dwellmg and the Transfer of Development Rlghts for one Unit (TDR2004-08008)
* See dlscusslOn under AnalysIs
Staff Report - Commulllty Development Soald - November 16, 2004
Case FLD2004-08059rrDR2004-08008 - Page 9 of 13
COMPLIANCE WITH RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECT FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA
"Section 2-404.F):
Consistent Inconsistent
1 The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for X
development IS otherwise economically ImpractIcal wlthollt deViations
from the mtenslty and development standards
2 The development of the parcel proposed for development as a X
reSidentIal mfill proJect will not matenally reduce the fair mdrket
value of abuttIn.g properties
3 The uses w]thm the resldentlalmfill proJect are otherWIse penmtted m X
thc dlstnct
4 The uses wlthm the res]dentlal mfill proJect are compatible with X*
adjaccnt lands uses
5 The development of the parcel proposed for development as a X*
reSidentIal mfill proJect wIll upgrade thc Immediate VICll1Ity of the
parcel proposed for development
6 The deSign of the proposed reSidentIal mfill proJect creates a fOnTI and X*
functIon which enhances the commul1Ity character of the Immed]ate
VICll1lty of the parcel proposed for development and the City of
Clearwater as a whole
7 FlexlbJ!]ty m regard to lot width, requned setbacks, heIght and off- X*
street parkmg are Jushfied by the benefits to community chardcter and
the ImmedIate VICllllty of the parcel proposed for development and the
City of Clearwater as a whole Bulldmg heIght may only exceed 80
feet, however, If the parcel proposed for development fronts on
Clearwater Bay or ]s only scparated from Clearwater Bay by a public
open space
* See dISCUSSion under AnalysIs
Staff Report - Commumty Development BOa! d - November 16, 2004
Case FLD2004-08059! fDR2004-08008 - Page 10 of 1 J
COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA (Section 2-803.C):
ConSistent Inconsistent
1 The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for X
development IS otherwIse Impractical wIthout devIatIOns from the use,
mtens]ty and development standards
2 The development of the parcel proposed for development as a X
ComprehensIve lnfill Redevelopment ProJect will not reduce the falf
market value of abuttmg properties
3 The uses w]thm the ComprehensIve lnfill Redevelopment ProJect are X
otherwise penmtted m the City of Cleaf\vater
4 The use or mIx of uses wnhm the Comprehensive In fi 11 X*
Redevelopment Prolect are compatible wIth adJacent land uses
5 The development of the parcel proposed for development as a X*
Comprehensive In fi II Redevelopment ProJect wJ!1 upgrade the
Immediate VICll11ty of the parcel proposed for development
6 The desIgn of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment X*
Project creates a form and function that enhances the commul1lty
character of the ImmedIate V1Cll11ty of the parcel proposed for
development and the City of Clearwater as a whole
7 FlexibilIty 111 regard to lot width, reqUIred setbacks, height and off- X*
street parkll1g are Justified by the benefits to commulllty character and
the Immediate VICllllty of the parcel proposed for development and the
Clty,ofClearwater as a whole
8 Adequate off-street parkll1g 111 the Immediate VICIl1Ity accordmg to the X
shared parkmg formula III DIvISiOn 14 of Artlcle 3 wtll be avaJ!able to
aVOId on-street parklllg III the Immediate VICIl1Ity of the parcel
proposed for development
9 The deSign of all buildll1gs complies wIth the Tounst Dlstnct deSign X*
gUldelmes 111 DIvISIOn 5 of Article 3
* See dIscusslOn under AnalysIs
S la IT Report - Community Deve lopment Board - November 16, 2004
Case FLD2004-08059/TDR2004-08008 - Page 11 of 13
COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS (Section 3-913):
ConSistent Inconsistent
1 Development of the land wl11 be m harmony with the scale, bulk, X*
coverage, denSity and character of adjacent properties
2 Development wJ!1 not hmder or discourage development and use of X
adjacent land and bUlldll1gs or signIficantly nnpa]r the value thereof
3 Development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X
I eSldmg or workll1g m the neIghborhood
4 Development IS deSigned to mmIm]Ze traffic congestion X
5 Development IS conSistent With the commumty character of the X*
ImmedIate vlclmty
6 DeSign of the proposed development mmllTIlZeS adverse effects, X*
lI1C ludll1g VIsual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operatIon
lInpdcts on ddJacent properties
* See diSCUSSIOn under AnalYSIS
COMPLIANCE WITH TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS ST ANDARDS
(Section 4-1403):
Consistent InconsIstent
1 The development of the parcel proposed for development wJ!1 not X
reduce the fair market value of abuttmg property
2 The uses wIthm the proJect are otherwIse permItted m the CIty of X
Clearwater
" The uses or mix of uses WI thm the proJect are compatIble WIth X
.)
adjacent land uses
4 The development of the parcel proposed for development will X*
upgrade the Immediate v]c]mty of the parcel proposed for
development
5 The deSign of the proposed proJect creates a fonn and function whIch X*
enhances the communIty chdracter of the Immediate vlcImty of the
parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a
whole
* See dISCUSSIon under AnalYSIS
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The Development ReVIew Committee revIewed the apphcatlOn and supportmg matenals on March
4,2004, ApnJ 1, 2004, dnd May 6,2004 The Planmng Department recommends DENIAL of the
FleXible Development request for (1) TennmatlOn of Status of Nonconfonnlty for denSity (15
overmght accommodatIon umts - to be converted to 11 dwelling umts), under the provIsions of
Section 6-109, (2) FleXIble Development approval to pennlt a total of 13 attached dwelhngs m the
Medium HIgh DensIty Residential (MHDR) Dlstnct and Tounst (T) D]stnct wIth reductIOns to lot
area 111 the MHDR D]stnct from 15,000 square feet to 8,700 square feet and m the T DIstnct from
10,000 square feet to 4,350 square feet, reductIOns to lot width m the MHDR DIstrIct from 150
Staff RepOl t - Commumty Development Board - November 16, 2004
Case FLD2004-08059ITDR1004-08008 - Page 12 of 13
feet to 100 feet and m the T DIstnct from 100 feet to SO feet, reductiOns to the front (north along
A valon Street - MHDR DIstnct) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet (to buIldmg) and from 25 feet to
zero feet (to dumpster stagmg pad), a reduction to the sIde (west - MHDR Dlstnct) from 10 feet to
zero feet (to bulidmg), a reductIon to the rear (south - MHDR D]stnct) from 15 feet to 10 feet (to
bUlldmg), a reductIon to the front (south along Kendall Street - T DIstnct) from 15 feet to 10 feet
(to bUlldmg), a reductlOn to the side (west - T D]stnct) from 10 feet to zero feet (to buIldmg), an
mcrease to buddmg heIght III the MHDR Dlstnct from 30 feet and III the T Dlstnct [rom 35 feet to
695 feet (to roof deck) with penmeter parapets of 3 67 feet (from roof deck) and decoratlVe roof
structures of 10 1 feet (from roof deck) and to penn]t a bmldll1g w]thll1 the vlslblhty tnangles, as a
Residential Infill ProJect III the MHDR DIstnct and as a ComprehensIve lnfill Redevelopment
ProJect III the T Dlstnct, under the provIslOns of SectlOns 2-404 F and 2-803 C, (3) ReductiOn to
the front pen meter buffer dlong AVdlon Street m the MHDR D]stnct from 10 feet to zero feet (to
dumpster stagmg pad) and a reduction to the sIde (west) landscape buffer m the MHDR Dlstnct
from 10 feet to zero feet (to butldmg), as a ComprehensIve Landscape Plan, under the provIsIons
of SectIOn 3-1202 G, and (4) Transfer of Development RIghts (TDR2004-08008) of one dwe1lll1g
umt to this site from 321 Coronado Dnve, under the provIsIOns of SectiOn 4-1402 for the site at
15-17 A va\on Street and 16 Kendall Street, wIth the followmg bases and condItIons
Bases for Del1lal
1 The proposal does not comply wIth the Flex]ble Development cntena as a ResIdentIal Infill
ProJect per SectIon 2-404 F
2 The proposal does not comply with the Flex]ble Development cntena as a Comprehensive
Infill Redevelopment ProJect per SectiOn 2~803 C
3 The proposal ]S not m complIance with other standards III the Code mcludmg the General
Applicabli] ty Cntena per SectIOn 3-913
4 The development IS not compatible wIth the surroundmg area and will not enhance other
redevelopment efforts
5 The proposal IS not III compliance wIth thc Old Flonda Dlstnct of Beach by DeSIgn
6 The proposal IS not III compliance with the cntena for the Transfer of Development Rights per
Section 4-1403 A
7 The Commumty Development Code does not pennlt stacked parkmg
Prepdred by Plannmg Department Staff
ATTACHMENTS
Aenal Photograph of Site and Vlcmlty
LocatIon Map
future Land Use Map
ZOl1lng Atlas Map
Appl]catlon
S IP/rlll/Jlng Dep'" tmentlC D BlrLEXlPendmg casesl Up fOI tile nexl CDBIA valon 15 Ambwllce on Willie Sands II /6 04 CDBIA va/on 15 Staff
Report doc
Staff Report - CommuDlty Development Board - November 16, 2004
Case FLD2004-08059/TDR2004-08008 - Page] 3 of 13
Owners:
Site:
.
.
.
,.
.
.
.
,.:
"
...,
....
"
...
Aerial Map
Lamer Beach Club, LLC,
Allan J. Crooker and McSmith, Inc.
15 - 17 Avalon Street
1 6 Kendall Street
I Case:
FLD2004-08059
TDR2004-08008
0.299
Property
Size(Acres) :
OS/29/15/16362/007/0050
PIN: OS/29/15/16362/007/0060
OS/29/15/16362/007/0140
I Atlas Page: 258A
Owners
SIte'
-"""""
P1Q DiD;
IT-gl~B!1
IO~ -0 DI
~D~di ",8
In~;
PROJECT ~ '"
SITE "",","",' c::=::1
~ OI9J
r-" _~~
D~U~U\[
9C-
!5fJi[
1n~!
~ 0 ""'-....
A ~~-
II
~
""
Location Map
lamer Beach Club, llC,
Allan J. Crooker and McSmlth, lnc
15 - 17 Avalon Street
16 Kendall Street
I Case
Property
SIze f Acres).
FlD2004-08059
TDR2004-08008
0.299
OS/29/15/16362/007/0050
PI N OS/29/15/16362/007/0060
OS/29/15/16362/007/0140
I Atlas Page. 258A
Owners
SIte
,
I
,
1 I
, r
,------'
I r- .{.J I
rL~ l..,
",I ""I l-..
:) _':.J ,Eli
GLENDALE S
'I I;
r'.., I r~~
-,J LJ &l
,-'
fMH-D j----
I I ----
I I I 1 '"I
) i I ~ 1-
L_~__J r 1 ~.:i
_I
,-=,'
I II
I I'
I "
~
2
p
-----.
I
,
~
C>
.-~ -
OS/R
--,
I
1
~
I
I
,-
il-l
1!>:r~ '" ,., ~ -, ~,
I rr '11 -"'I ,'" ~ ~ I II
,L_'I Ii, ) ~ I ;::
-~ --I II ,- c-J, l1S{ ~
,..., '- ml )
I '.:.:: ----r ~
"!lt~ l8-~!:I,j .
B'W. !
;
f--, r' I.,r.. tl1!, ':
l.t> ,!,.'~, '1'10 II '.
e- I ' , I .,0 I
..." I 1 1
1 1 Lu1_T; ~e:
J k--a", 1 r,
_.. _"- ]~ I 1
'"
r 1 -I ,.,
I 11, '
I' I I
'-- I J I
I j 11 I I
...l.J ,---i __J
I 5fJ()
I ,
I I
1~:~ C=JPl
""'J^' -
<~ ~,,-
"" <
" ~
" ~
'v'$.;4
532
Zoning Map
lamer Beach Club, LLC,
Allan J Crooker and McSmlth, Inc.
15 - 17 Avalon Street
16 Kendall Street
lease
Property
SIze (Acres)
PIN
I Atlas Page'
I T
i.
~-="'T
I il-~64C1
= lmlT
1-' I'
I __.J l
I': _=-
639
T 1.-....
I y"
I J-l..J
!'JZ9
,
l
61J1.
-, ,
I
:--t
I Il32
L ""L..-~~-l
: IJ2j!.lJ
0:
OS/R
005
..
(gw---i -""- 1-'
, 581 ,I I r ,
t 579 : --" 'LJ
I _I
I -~ '----I 604
it1 : I ~--y ~
I I', I . I
, I,' I 1,_,
I I _:-~'
I ,~
I 'I
l.__~ L_~..J
g,.,
531
;:
~
FlD2004-D8059
TDR2004-D8008
0.299
It
~....\
\ \....--
e}.1 ~......;
-11'
"
,
A
$11 ,
~ ,J
" ~
I 1
1 "
(eO!r, . ~
oL._ \ \
1 I..
II~
~~ '--8
, 1
I , --
I I
I l__=-
I
I
I
I
I I
,
1
I "
I
l__.." r
_I
I I
, ;)1;1
I
;:;
-
",-
p
OS/29/15/16362/007/0050
OS/29/15/16362/007/0060
OS/29/15/16362/007/0140
258A
At '.... II - ~ Lf" II "AnI I 64r ,'f~ IJ
tacl-.:I.., ~I I 1 "~\
-T 1 r-I , ht !:,i
D~~~!~g! ,!.;? I iT," I I Ii I ,
L, ''11'-., I ,Le640! e" ,
., : ~ I I Lj &'l I
-II ~ I r-\.j r-' lftant I
L...J I I I 1 , '
GLENDALE ST 1--"1 'l'JJ,)
C:_ 1 ;Iv
to ROYAL WAY
--------- ~-------,
: A~tach~d I -'J\,] 1J36 ~
15 I _~ n L I I
I D . ------~ ,-0 ~i1 \ \.- \
1 I I 1 ~ "::l 1 1 Dl 629 1- I Y U) f}~~
I I I ~ I I I fifched LEaci.
I 1 I ! ,- ty~ -;f' /
L_,__~ [ .s ~ D
- 1 ~,mgs ~ '#1
HElL WOOD ST - I ,. , I
""l I
1 ..,.....~ ~-L ~~-I : -~--6~ ~
r~1 ~r ~o~
ta~ IPI1 11111 ' I
I I, )1 "_) 1__~ 510 I I L ~ ~
," --I - " - -
L_...J 18 i'
r:-J i -'.J"Bl71 "t
P~r U r ~ I, )
~qg Lot ....~I"'. i 11 G
lJW~1II \ I
AVALON ST r'60!;" -~6
e.'~~_ City Park 2 ' 1
t--, ~~ I
~i ""L...J 1-1. ~
Parking h"""L -..go: _~ i~J s ~~
L
--, ]t:tu ii'~ 605
Lot I
I _J
~ I __ I I
_~ c~.: ~bt ail --, - 1
--' 1 __5!~
-- JUANITA WA Y I
1
rJ ~~Iil~ ., ~p1g' -1.- I
0 1 ,11 '--===;-
I 1 _J 'LJ I
r----' 1- I ~~oIq' : A dJin. I l,
I 1 --'1 604 "
I , 1 c-----i. I l -1tr-1' Chuuh
l~ ~ h' --- 55 I 1 --l
I I r. 580 1 I A"=r {i02j
Irant : ~as L_t"'"1
- I I 'J I ~ I l__.... l-w
<> ",I ~ StatiM; ~dail : ,I I \_1 _I I
,r.:1- 1- I ~.J I I
t I I -~ 1 ~!
1 _
L L A
SA Y ESPLANADE
,.'\.^J - 531 ~ 0;;
Ftte ~~ ~
St~on S q: City Park
".....~ >-
:5
~
~
Parking Lot 532 ~
~
Existing Surrounding Uses Map
Owners I Lamer Beach Club, LLC, I Case FLD2004-08059
Allan J. Crooker and McSmlth, Inc. TDR2004-08008
Site 15 - 17 Avalon Street Property 0.299
16 Kendall Street Size (Acres)
OS/29/15/16362/007/0050
PIN OS/29/15/16362/007/0060
OS/29/15/16362/007/0140
I Atlas Page 258A
View looking south at existing overnight
accommodation building at 15 Avalon Street
View looking.north at existing overnight
accommodation building at 16 Kendall Street
View looking north at City parking lot and
development north of Avalon Street
--
..:;= ~
-~
..
...
...
-.... .-
, _ ''''-r...
-
-- -
View looking southeast at existing detached
dwelling building at 17 Avalon Street
View looking north along west side of 15
Avalon Street and 16 Kendall Street
I
,:
'- ,-..............
'""-....... c;;;
....
. .....:if .
.' . .""!'!,
.-:/"~.;'
View looking northeast at development on north
side of Avalon Street
15 - 17 Avalon Street and 16 Kendall Street
FLD2004-0805 9/TD R2004-08008
Page 1 of 2
11
'.L' ",
-.,
;-~;
r'.l~
_/.11. _.~
-,~~ I
+rr'j" ~'llm " !~LI,~
Ll'l.. ~,......... . . -...,.. ~.. ~~t _ ." "'
' -, -'7.0... L.
~ -:......~'-~
~~ ~--t.!~
~
~~
I
-l
View looking south at property east of subject
property (17 Avalon Street)
~
/'
View looking southeast of subject property at
development on south side of Kendall Street
'!.~~'. ;ii(i6.."i~'(':".i(
~l~'''''~'''~
,~_'~~ ~~~~L~(y"t.:.._._,.
- ----1
View looking northeast of subject property at
development along north side of Kendall Street
'---~
~---.
---
View looking southwest of subject property at
development on south side of Kendall Street
View looking north from Kendall Street at City View looking northwest from Kendall Street at City
parking lot west of subject property parking lot and beach beyond west of subject property
15 - 17 Avalon Street and 16 Kendall Street
FLD2004-08059/TDR2004-08008 Page 2 of 2
FLD2004-08058/TDR2004-08008 - 15-1 7 Avalon Street & 16 Kendall Street
y..t.e-~...\
CondltlOns of Approval
1 That the final desIgn and color of the bUlldmg be consIstent with the conceptual
elevatIOns submItted to, or as modrfied by, the CDB,
2 That a Umty of Title be recarded In the public records pnar to the Issuance of any
pem11ts,
3 That a specIal warranty deed, spec]fymg the number of dwellll1g umts bemg
conveyed or sold from 321 Coronado Dnve and beIng transferred to this slte, be
recorded pnor to the Issuance of any penmts for thIs proJect The special warranty
deed shall also contam a covenant restnctll1g 111 perpetUity the use of all platted lots at
321 Coronado Dnve due to the transfer of development nghts Any mortgage holder
of the sendll1g sIte (321 Coronado Dnve) shall consent to the transfer of development
nghts pnor to the issuance of any penmts,
4 That any futUle freestandll1g Sign be a monument-style SIgn a maXImum four feet 111
heIght Jnd deSigned to match the extenor matenals and color of the building,
5 That all FLre Department reqUIrements be met pnor to the Issuance of any pern11t,
6 That all proposed utdlhes (from the nght-of-\'vay to the proposed bUlldmg) be placed
underground CondUIts for the future undergroundll1g of eXIstmg utdltles wlthll1 the
abuttmg nght(s)-of-way shall be 1I1stalled along the entire site's street frontages pnor
to the Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy The applicant's representative shall
coardmate the sIze and number of condUIts with all affected utility provIders (electne,
phone, cable, etc), wIth the exact locatIOn, Size and number of conduits to be
approved by the apphcant's engmeer and the CIty's Engmeenng Department pnor to
the commencement of work,
7 That all Parks and RecreatIOn fees be paId pnor to the Issuance of any permits,
8 That a condomllllUffi plat be recorded pnor to the Issuance of the first Certl ficate of
Occupancy,
9 That pnor to the Issuance of any pennlt, thc survey be corrected to mdlcate the
property located m SectlOn 8, Township 29, Range 15,
10 That the northern staIrwell be redeSigned pnor to the Issuance of any penmts to
provIde an dccesslble path directly to a pedestnan WdY, acccptable to the
Development ServIces and Plannmg Departments,
~
.. ~'-'
I
,I,
!
CD
I
4 J ~
~i ru,~;)d1:tk;_T COj -~{/Ld.<i~rUd<<J -u1;r7 r~.?J)d:,- - r
,'! UG.\l i_~__-'wf-Jo-ki~- --cJfJ;r-J-o L, rJ_tJ A..LJ~[_~"fj_~ -- ------~_
--:, i .~-,,-Jl -r;.CA-PM~'-r--WJ"L.'j)~'1.~J 51 -J l".(:/-,:1ik ~<.J.ik!,,-)~.~~
Wls.
.1
,~~ Q~JL ~
:1 - nt' iJ C:~L~~~C" :tklS_~cW"t.
Ii - tJ 0 L'O.rJ J _~,,"~\c.\~_
,I r J
, - f1eet /30 M-fb. wjt:\~ J u...J , ~v'i}J:-~_GJe.. _
· . ~_lVo;JL.k.U:UfD",s.121. _ -t,r ""'"'""t-~..ce.
- U dJ.--"" o~ ) ~ ~_c.ck 5' v~ ~~ C-'1,_",-_L=f3_U_'/Y>._"-~ ..
~ ~ -hr ~m_~:net._.
~ ~ 5--ke e::1: ..s ~if w~)) r-U-l- +-0 n'"'L'o.. \..:;r-- - ~1"-r ~ ~ \
I; ~~ ~ hQ. o..~~~k
r C,3'\d;" l'\Aci k ~ \)12.". ~{"~t-. ~ bl'Y-e ~L
II li)O J:!-N-L W~.l\~ ~~~ bo.o re.~'\-.*,d ,d-e.--~_
" I.Llt"t -},""'~ ~L _~ j~_,.6f- D~ ~ vO.lJd
'j ~~ ~ bL r-~Ov1.4.:=.lli.~ ~d ~ dro----tl- l?ev. ~~ ,_
::- ~LhL'~'}~""-<:!L'':::'ll!.J,)\< ';l"';)~.. ~ r ,,>.::t-b,t- ct-- "",IL~:: b~
I~ ~~c\_~["""N~_~~~~.
.j
j~~ri.Lf2b~-~ - <;\aH
!- i"J~ 1\)..tLf:~_lr:x~,.. ~J ~u~ '('JW p-~:tk~J~
'1- ~ 0 ~ ......~SL~ C.i,-io l"'e.c-l,,-o~ ~ M>r-"'~"""""') ---..--
, ~~.~i-:s . , .
, 1_ C~t-t !tl~~\ ? .
J 7/;',0..\0-.) i~
_, (" rUv'~Q...\" c...o&e.._~~c.3:ut-e_~~:e:s~~ov-.€S f-Ll:f.Q)-~--_.
: i ( =r, t \... )d~ <JL.)., S +........... ~. '--"1J-~-,...4..~" 1'4. L +... \ t, ""j
'! ~ f'--_,_l~. J-F .
,
';:kJ,~ bLd~! .
.:- L't9-{,.i)1L~h..1L J:~.k ~d-=---t-"r~:L..*LQ" clJ") .
:~ /d./~(J,J&Lb_d~ C-{-"- )~f/ ::h~o.~
,!==--IZQJ\]I'\-'=-lwr. c.lt." ~_,_5-'-j'f_tI-t d _1..bj. tf.._, i c.~!$:..-_~ kJ:'~tLd-:
~f--.-- ..: fl.LI -" Q . -- - -
~) 1 -
.- ~ .. -
I (b)
- .Jo1.~ 5c~ - ~~~ .J.o J>J JIv\.~~~_W)JJ). "3 \ ...,..4..4. '\r:I~\:\h,
lUi)l k <\e.<<IW.,J-y_W ho .,; 1\ f Il..l~W look- ~r ......; ~ ~ ·
G'~ l-v;\} ~:~ - ~t_(N Q.. ~~~~ r,\} :3 \ O\..~ .
=--MJ! Ned ~ oS vr_v~ldj ~. )J;Jl ~. ~hu-.i- ~}J1 ~
:to~ lMLC_~_ .
, - w,)1 ~~~l.,J)lLai2 + J2cv:._~.tftJ:~-t~\~~"'-\.
hliU ~_h_.SiLIII ~-lv-_M.<lgi,~3:0 JIlV'k. J.. f-11'f- as ~ l +
lA ):t.o..~ ~v iJ .
.i2e.~. A,~ lA:t ",/n ~ -h 1 b ...).s n .\.0 e ~1, ~~1-.
"
I
-
-
,
-
-
, -
.
.. ,. .. .
I. LosJ Lf~~
L. ~.'y... k~4!.-
3-" ~'o.-~:) \~
.-- l3.11 )~_-bLl~~~h ,
..- B:.l ~lt~*- \l~~J~I-5b +i j
- f\l () I 0 '" ~ J. Y-~"':t
J:1"~~~_<'~_.~?-R_';j 1'vrku.._lc.l~ \')-~~d .
.. L \ G-- b' \:t\~
J~~..J~.i, .
J C~ h pJ)! ~)C\~ )0+- off- N.s ~cl '^- T J2 N"" h 'j-r-U 'OJ:
l~,:..l JuT.
- D~,"~~~-\ ~-~~
Se1---~ ~h~_~/_J~~ ~-v
- SuiCJ~ c:e
- fj,h Q v:l1 a-
- U~)LL-PD J~) -SJ~(2.f
- 1 ($Cj L3 rv'c:h
- Cj f\ ~ -k~~'.
.
I
~
jL...
.- '#"'<t
,''<It.Al~ ,,51~~
.\.1. ~. "" ~y;;:-
.,;'t'~.~I,:/1 "'....,,-~~
... c:;.~ il.. ff{/tf-.. .....
:c-:I~ ~ ~ "~:if~ ..q::
:~ ~ --~.-- ~,"
'::.~''; --- ..~,
-..Jf;i'i~'~'~~/
"'-'.;.,S.illltl
Fire CondItIon
1 0/21/2004
Conditions Associated With
FLD2004-08059
15 AVALON $T
Joe Colbert
562-4567 xt 3548
The North Stauway must empty directly 10 a pedestrian way The plan shows thIs staIrway
dumpIng Into the garage, a more hazardous area
Not Met
Arden Dittmer
562-4604
1 0/21/2004
Landscape Curbmg CondItIon
Nol Met
10/21/2004 (A_D)
Same comment Please Indicate curbIng where required
9/24/2004 (A_D)
Per Section 3-1204 D all landscaping must be protected from vehIcular and pedestrian traffic by
the Installation of curbing and wheel stops. or other protectIVe deVIces along the perimeter of any
landscaping which adjoins vehicular use areas and Sidewalks These proteclive deVices shall
have a mInimum heIght of SIX Inches above grade
Arden Dittmer
562-4604
10/21/2004
Landscape Penmeter Condltl
Not Met
Landscape
10/21/2004
10/21/2004 (A_D)
Plans have been reVIsed depicting a change In the retention area and the landscape now IS not
meeting Code requirements as outlined In Code SectIon 3-1202 D 1 and Code Section
3-1202 D 2
The vines are a nice addition to the elevation and certainly soften the blank walls of the garage,
but do not seem to meet the "Arch Itectura I th e me" as required I n Code Section 3-1202 G of the
ComprehenSIve landscape program
9/24/2004 (A_D)
Plan does not meet the requirements of penmeter plantlngs In Code Section 3-1202 0
There IS a large portion of bUilding In the required buffer area to the west of the bUIlding In the
MHDR zoning dIstrict ReVise plan to Install thIS buffer area
Arden Dittmer
562-4604
10/21/2004 (A_D)
Prior to Building Permit application,
After futher review and the changes on the resubmlttallt IS apparent the area where the stagIng
area IS may not allow more than a small area along the bUilding for a climbIng vIne It does not
appear that the reVised plan Will work well as the Inset area where the palm cluster IS proposed
Indicates a 12' tall plant underneath a 8 or 9 foot overhang The reVIsed plan also has relocated
the eXIt door which may be a concern respective to fire or bUIlding codes RevIsit the area and
submit accordingly prior to BUilding permit application
Not Met
9/24/2004 (A_D)
There IS an extensive area In front of the entry to the north Side which could have additIonal
landscape materials IfIstalled In It
Parks & Recs CondItIon
Open Space and RecreatIon Impact Fees are due prior to Issuance of bUilding permIts or final plat Not Met
(If applicable) whichever occurs fl(st These fees could be substantIal and It IS recommended that
you contact Deb Richter at 727-562-4817 to calculate the assessment
CaseCondltons
Print Date 11/04/2004
Page 1 of 2
..
.r r-.
Zoning CondItIon
10/21/2004
1 0/21/2004
1 0/21/2004
0910 7/2004
FLD2004-08059
15 AVALON ST
Wayne Wells
562-4504
10n1ffi4-WW N~M~
Revise Sheet C2 1 for comment below
9/7/04 - WW
Revise the engineering bar scale left of the zero mark to change from "40" to "20" feet
10/21/04 - WW Not Met
Show on Sheets A6 & A7 as to the colors of all exterior elements of the bUilding labeled as to what
will be #1 versus #2 colors as provided on the submitted color sample sheet Cannot tell where
color #2 IS on the bUlldmg elevations
9/7l04 - WW
Identify on Sheels A4 and AS the proposed colors of the bUIlding and architectural elements
10/21104 - WW Not Met
Staff will stili not support proposal
917/04 - WW
Setback reductions are significant, espeCIally on the west sIde where a zero setback IS requested
In addition, the size of the parcel and lot width reduction requests are less than the standards set
forth In the Zonmg Districts ContributIng factors 10 these concerns may Include, but may not be
limIted to, the size of the Units proposed (UnIts A & B greater than 3,000 square feet, Units Cover
2,300 square feet), the request to Terminate the Status of Nonconformity for 15 overnight
accommodation units to be converted to 11 dwellmg Units (otherwise at 30 dulacre would produce
only eight permitted dwelling unIts) and the transfer of development rights of one unIt The Old
FlOrida District limits height to "low to mId-rise" BUIlding heIght IS proposed at 69 5 feet from BFE
to roof deck To date, the tallest struCture proposed or approved WIthin thiS DIstrIct IS 69 5 feet
from BFE to the roof deck (La Rlsa, 650 Bay Esplanade), which had varying roof deck buildIng
heIghts, With 69 5 being the tallest roof heIght (57% of total roof area) Other roof heIghts were
585 feet, 48 feel and 37 5 feet above BFE) The project at 14 Somerset was approved at 56 feet
m height The project at15 Somerset was approved at 61 66 feet m height Potentially too many
Units are being proposed or a different deSIgn would be more acceptable Staff will nol support
the proposed height and proposed setbacks
ProVide narrative documentmg that thIS proposed buildIng Will also meet BUIlding Code Not Met
reqUIrements for the square footage of openIngs allowed on each Side based on the setbacks
proposed
CaseCondllons
P rtnt Date 11 l04/2004
Page 2 of 2
Wells, Wayne
From
Sent
To
Subject
Wells, Wayne
Monday, November 08, 2004 7 17 AM
Debra Butler (E-mail)
FLD2004-08059, 15-17 Avalon Street and 16 Kendall Streets
Importance
High
Debra -
I need for you to revIse ASAP the ExhIbIt A for the Comprehensive landscape Program, specifIcally In two areas
1 Section 1 b - Remove all reference to any proposed carports on the City parking lot to the west from the last sentence
2 Section 3 - Remove all reference to landscapIng the parkIng lot to the north across Avalon Street ThIs has not been
discussed at all with CIty staff
Need 15 copies of the revised Exhibit A this mornIng Call me If you have any questIons
Weyne
1
S \engln\autocad\atlas,25tlA dwg, Uy/LJjLUUL U'::I UL :./ ....vl, Ol<lny
r..
I
I
I
I
I
I~
If;;--' ~ ...l.""", ~ ~
II ~ ~- ~ i
~~ : E! !
Ii
ii
..... ~
N
7>
-....J
1>
I
I
I
I
I
I r--
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
[D '-"'tJ:
~j,o,""""'~
~tr~~~
o~
ill: rl\""Q~
; "..l~6 ·
... il'........... "'~
'<l
6 ~-o(
~
1 >W<DIou.v
.~
a
~~.
?
flEAO<
:;..~
~$;~
8
p;
~
~ -/r
i'l
;>>
1':l
,. "
n
:r:
;>>
...,..,
~n
d~
~..
,..,
X
O~
~
rJl~
..........."
,:;
~! -11 ' \ ii , ·
~
YJ l~G/r-w-aiQff..
Je~C5Yr-
$,? ~ --
~~~ " ,-- '1
~~ -::Y;~g \ - ~ t
---------------------~-y..-~"tV-~ (~f:J
T 89<;';(: c i
I ~. · [J i ~ @8 0 1: !f!!!!!m !f~lJijfl~'~~~ l~~
N N (J > oV) ~ rrt 0 [~ ~:~~~f~~~i g tLI~~ ~
~ ~ ::! E ~~ g is 0 ii :.'H'~~~h ! !l9,q)A.~ '~~
~ ~ j ~ ~ ~ ~ g -g ~~~ ~j~~~;~!H ?r_~ ~8 ~ rr;I n 1
LIl o:::;~ ~ EB ':;:~ ~~~i~:;J~ ~::Iv> ~ - -;
~ ~ oj ~~ ;u ;' Z ~t:. ~~~~,Fn t ~ ~ ~,.:
5 ~ ~ ~'tJ ~ !~: ~..~~~;!:~ i ~..~g ~=-:~
4 ~ : ~* g g 'n i~i~~~h; f il~~Gi g;P
~~ n ~:~~.g~!~.~ ~ wi~~ ~~_n~ ~
..( -{ i[ .........::;.,~~~ '=. r ~i~z_ ~...~
c ~ ... ~""._l~";n !~, :r,:>;l
~ g) ~~ ~~:~i~:~~ .. E';J ~ b ~
V) 8 ~: ~~i J{~~ ~ i.! ~ ~ ~ ~
: i ;;-i"t~~'" ~ ~~ g :po gJ
i'.)
Ol
-..)
IlJ
to.
,
u>Vl
""
i
~
I, N
"'.... 0
~Q Z
I ~ Z
u;g G)
o
fT'Z
)>
- -II--
N r 'ii':",
(J1 )> 8fT'
(f) ",,.,:;
(X) ;::,~
)> BO
c
~
il
L--'
EilB
. .
"~ ~
1~ i
",}~ ~
..
~uiJ
0-1
J;[ f2/:ciG(!)..
.
on-l
0.....::1:
'2:">'lt"l ...
<:;l- . ow
Orn~
::~ow:
--~--~--~--~--~--
Cl
Y5 l00/r-W-aif'/r- ~ JC ar--b-fnL
.'
;
1'"'
~
~
l~
t'
3.
YJ
iF'
'"
....
_ _, \-.J ~fJ.-)rM. ~ ~\\~C.Q W k:~_~_Pvn-~____
- -- - - :-l c) Y---/J)"b-t. @- j.o ~. S l~' \/)~ s~,_r _(_t\C4.~* _ _ _ ~s _
w _ .. _ ..........._ _ ___ _ _ __~___ -. _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ __ _ -----.--~ _ _ ____~_
=--:=-~~-_. I_~.~_~ ~:z ~~']~_-~;~::.~--:- ~~~~~ ..~
- 2.., S" "'" 7.7S e - I'.. "'3."'2iS"
- - ----- ~r-- - - ~ - - ---- - ---- -- --- - - --- ~ - -.___._ - - _ ____
- - -- - -_.~_S'I.,Jk _~\ ~ --4:-'3. '<1,-'_( ytrlt\__~_Q.L)<. )-(-~-~-\v~\l.\.-~\ la .~) ___
d )
,
------...- - ,~-----~- - - -- --------'"- - --- -- ____ -_____ - --__ __+___ ~ __ ____w__..I-_ _ _ ______ _ _
-- - - - ,~_ - (g \ '_~ ~......J :s .7 S-'--_' @-Io l..::S' _~_ __ _ _ :__ _ _ _.
-----~- ~ --- ---.---- - -- --------------- ----
----- -~~~R-&h-~~\-@--z. 9._~_'_Ccl~\L \L~_eL)---- _ ___ ________ _
- --- ---------r- - - - - --7-2..4. s --- ---- ...-) 7--- - ---2...-- -- - ---~-
- -- -----,~ - ~, ~ - ~- - l () .5")-=--( 8 · 'S' 'i.. ~)_:: C[?~~-~]_i-.z.) _ :; _ _7~bS ~S"' ___ _
----- _~>____LJ~S-"1-. 7.. ,__'S. ::=.- -- J'3J. 'ZS ----------- --- --- ---rh -
- -----~---~-. S- ~~~~J- ~-~-~--Ib' tz.S - - - <0 ~3-"-~ 7~__ ___ _ ___
~f---- _ ~~L~ _~ · 0_-'=__ _ __ _(1._ _ _ _ _ _ _____ _ ____
~ ....(2...1'; 'Z-\ ~ '- ~ - L
- ~ - ----t---- \..t -- --:....)-.. - - ~- - ------ ---- ------ --" ----- - -- ----
~
-- ------J/------------ -- -------- --______
I
\
-- -- -~ - ~- - --------- ------~ - - --
---:~~~I-~t_~~_ _~_ (t~~J-=-~_~ $
,
I'
---4-~ ___ __ ~ ___ _ _ ___ ___ _____ __ ___
i' ~PLrt.Q...-~e( _ _ _______ _ _ _____
-~- - ~=C'i -~ __~-O .~1- -- -. ----
- - __S~_~~_ __=__L0-"-~ _ ____ _ .
I_'EL t\-h_~_.9 _,_I __. _ ___
, ~~- - ~
- - --- __.____----'<-__ _ ________ .Y_ ( l~- .0___ ___ _ __
J 0"0.@1l
\
___________ __ _ II
_ _ _ _...............,,1 _ _ _
t
-- --- -- - - - ---------- - ---
j
----" ---'-.... ~--------'" -- - -----.--- - ---
-<J.-
I
,
--...............-- j..-
~.aearwater
u
CIty Attorney's Office
Interoffice Correspondence Sheet
TO WIlliam B Horne II, CIty Manager
FROM Pamela K Akin, CIty Attorney
CC Garry Brumback, Assistant City Manager
Kev]n Garnott, BUilding Off]clal, Development & Neighborhood Services
LIsa Fierce, Assistant Director, Planning Department
SUBJECT Proposed Restnctlve Covenant benefiting - 15 & 17 Avalon Street and 16
Kendall Street
DATE August 9,2004
You recently met with prospective purchasers of the property at 15 & 17 Avalon Street
and 16 Kendall Street ("Development Parcel") on Clearwater Beach In order to
maxImIze development on the site and ensure a beach vIew for the condos, the
developer IS proposing that the CIty put a restnctlve covenant on the east 30 feet of the
City parking lot which abuts the proposed development on the west ("City Parcel")
ThIS covenant would, In perpetuIty, prevent the construction of structures or walls on
that portion of the CIty Parcel ThiS permanent restriction of the City's property rights
would permIt the Developer to bUild to his property line without limiting the openings,
that IS Windows and doors, on their west building face To screen the City parking lots,
the Developer proposes to put a roof over the City Parcel and landscape the north
parking lot You have asked whether the City can put a restnctlve covenant on the City
Parcel permanently proh]bltlng constructIon of bUildings on the east 30 feet
Background
The Development Parcel development abuts the City Parcel The plat indIcates that the
City Parcel IS approximately 125 feet by 175 feet The paved portion IS approximately
70 feet by 175 feet and currently proVIdes approximately 33 parking spaces The City
Parcel IS zoned OSR PermItted uses under the Land Development Code Include
parkmg, government faCIlitIes, recreatIon faCIlities and restaurants Due to the Charter
restnctlon on recreation/open space property, the CIty Parcel cannot be sold, leased or
otherwise conveyed Without referendum, except under very limited circumstances
Additionally, there IS a restrictive covenant that reqUires the City to get the wntten
consent of HUD before selling or leaSing the property
Based on the tax records, the Development Parcel IS qUite small, approximately 100
feet In width at ItS widest portion and 175 feet In length The narrowest portion of the L-
shaped lot IS 50 feet In width The Development Parcel IS zoned MHDR and the
Developer proposes to develop approximately 14 condominIums While the Developer
has not yet submitted an application for development approval, they indicated to you
that It IS their desire to bUild to the property hne on the west boundary that abuts the
City Parcel Because of the Flonda BUilding Code requirements relating to bUilding
separation and fire ratings, bUildings bUilt to the property line can have no openings or
windows on the zero setback walls A set back of 3 feet would allow them to have 10
percent openings or Windows The bUilding would have to be setback 30 feet from the
property line In order to have the size and number of doors and windows that they
deSire A restrictive covenant on the east 30 feet of the City Parcel WhiCh, In
perpetuity, prevents the construction of structures or walls, would allow the Developer
to bUild to the property hne without limiting the openings on their west bUilding face
Discussion
Under Flonda law, a restnctlve covenant IS not an Interest In real property but a
contractual right Ryan v. the Town of Mana/apan 414 So 2d 193(1982) As a
consequence, the Charter provIsions restrlctmg the transfer of real property and
recreation open space property do not apply However, this development restnctlon
would detract significantly from the value and future use of the CIty Parcel and add
greatly to the value and development potential of the Development Parcel
I found no statute, case or Attorney General's opmlon that dIrectly addresses the grant
of a restnctlve covenant for the benefit of pnvate property However, there IS an
abundance of law relating to the transfer of property, funds or performance of services,
which give gUidance as to the appropnate legal analysIs when the City tS undertaking
actions that have a pnvate benefit
Article VIII, section, 2, FlOrida Constitution, expressly grants to every mUnicipality
the authonty to conduct mUnicipal government, perform mUnicipal functIons, and render
mUnicipal services The only constitutional limItation placed on the mUnicIpalities'
authOrity IS that such powers be exerCised for valid muniCipal purposes Similarly S
1 01 of the City Charter states In part
(a) General Powers The City of Clearwater, FlOrida,
(the "City"), created by Chapter 9710, SpeCial Laws of FlOrida,
1923, as amended, eXists as a muniCipal corporation With all
governmental, corporate and propnetary powers to enable It to
conduct mUnicipal government, perform mUnicipal functions and
render mUnicipal services The City may exercise any power for
mUnicipal purposes except when expressly prohibited by law In
addition to the powers enumerated herein, the CIty shall be vested
with all powers granted by general or special acts of the
Legislature of the State of Florida or as otherwise provided by
law
(c) Construction The powers of the City under this
charter shall be construed liberally In favor of the City The City IS
empowered to do whatever IS necessary and proper for the safety,
health, convenIence and general welfare of ItS inhabitants The
specIfic mention of a particular power In this charter shall not be
construed as limiting the general power stated In this Section of
Article I
In State v City of Orlando, 576 So 2d 1315 (Fla 1991), the court stated "A valid
mUnicipal purpose must relate to the conduct of mUnicipal government, exercise of a
mUnicipal function, or proVIsion of a municipal service (See Ormond Beach v County
of Volusla, 535 So 2d 302, 304 (Fla 5th DCA 1988)) "Generally, a municipal purpose
IS one that IS related to the health, morals, safety, protection or welfare of the
mUnicipality ",Id
As long as there IS paramount mUnicipal purpose, inCidental private benefit IS not
prohibited In Poe v. Hlllsborough County, 695 So 2d 672 (Fla 1997), the FlOrida
Supreme Court discussed the Issue of public purpose versus private benefit The
court opined
" State v Town of North Miami, Fla 59 So 2d 779, Adams v
Housmg Authority of City of Daytona Beach, Fla 60 So 2d 663, and
Cfiy of Clearwater v Caldwell, Fla 75 So 2d 765 Each of these
cases Involved attempts of the City to use public funds to develop
property for private benefit and gain and In each case the Court
ruled such not to be proper public use In each of these cases, the
pnvate purpose was predominate, not inCidental to a publiC
purpose The first case Involved the development of an area for
Industnal purposes, the second Involved the acquIsition of an area
for leasing to pnvate enterpnses for Industnal and commercial
purposes, and the third was concerned With the City being Involved
In the construction for leasing of hotels or apartments for pnvate
enterpnse
In those cases the inCidental public purpose accomplished was too
inconsequential In companson to the private gain "
The Court when on to state.
"In State v Board of Control, Fla 66 So 2d 209, 210, we said
3
'The mere fact that someone engaged In pnvate business for
pnvate gain WIll be benefited by 'every public Improvement
undertaken by the government or a governmental agency, should
not and does not deprive such Improvement of Its public character
or detract from the fact that It pnmarlly serves a public purpose An
Inc]dental use or benefit which may be of some pnvate benefit IS
not the proper test In determining whether or not the project IS for a
public purpose t "
The decIsion to place the restrictIve covenant on the City Parcel would reqUIre actIon
by the City CouncIl The City would have to determine that the restriction serves a
public purpose In AGO 83-06, the Attorney General's Office, m allOWIng the City of
Starke to purchase eqUipment for a "Pop Warner" football program operated by a
nonprofit corporation, cited Its own earher OpiniOn, AGO 77-27, when It stated-
" the presence of a public purpose IS ultimately a factual determination for
the legislature (In thiS Instance, the legislative and govermng body of the
City) or the courts, but that initially there must be both some clearly Identified
and concrete public purpose as a pnmary obJective, and a reasonable
expectation that the purpose Will be accomplished"
To my knowledge, the City has not previously undertaken such a restnctlon directly for
the benefit of a pnvate developer The closest Similar cIrcumstance IS the Station
Square Project In the proposed Station Square Development, the City entered Into an
agreement With the Commumty Redevelopment Agency ("the CRA") to restrict future
development In Station Square Park Within 30 feet of the east property hne The
purpose of thiS restnctlon was to support residential and retail redevelopment In
downtown on property to be sold by the CRA to the developer ThiS restrictIon was
done In the context of a development agreement that provided incentives to the
Developer In exchange for certam commItments from the Developer The Downtown
Plan has as a priOrity residential and retail development and proVides a legal predicate
for incentives
The proposed project is In the Old Flonda DIstrict of Beach by DeSign Beach By
DeSign contemplates and proVides the baSIS for certam incentives for Resort
development In the Destmatlon Resort Dlstnct (North Mandalay) and the Beach Walk
District It also contemplates certain development mcentlves to assemblages of
property In the Manna ReSidential District I did not find Similar language in the Old
Flonda District to support City mcentlves
Therefore, the appropnate analYSIS IS whether thiS restnctlve covenant serves a public
purpose and whether the benefit to the private parties IS InCidental to the paramount
public purpose In this particular Circumstance, the pnvate benefit appears to be
primary purpose of the restriction The City Parcel would be greatly limited m value
4
...
oa-10-04 Oe.26arn Frorn-JOHNSON,POP-~-\
127441 as 17
T-46a P 02/03 F-530
_".,,#:
,l'~':' ~L~IIN;~''''
.,t.\ ~~'1l'''''''",4I'~;-'''
..'~......." "~'1-
"~,, I ~' ._-
""~;:.!,, I, \: So"
~, '\ ~ ..
fll~~-I ~.<C""
.. ':, ".....,....
~~;.,. S!:
':..~"'~~ ,.,~~
---:r/jlX~m"'1t.~'
............. TEl\, "\ I.t
....~II.'I,I
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
J'()~l O~flCE Box 474g, CLEARWAlhR, FLOlUD^ 33758-4748
MllNlCIPAl SI RV1(.[S 6UlIDING. 100 ~.oU1 H MYRTLE Avl:J'/U F) CLEARWATI:.Il, FI.oRlDA 33756
'fhE:PHON[ (727) 552.4567 FAX (727) ')62 4576
LOt'le. RANG!! PIANNIN(;
DI:\l'fJOPMllNl RfVlFW
August 3,2004
TImothy A Johnson, Jr.
Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, I...LP
911 Chestnut Street
Post Office Box 1368
Clearwater, FL 33757-1368
Re 16 Kendall Street and 15-17 Avalon Street
Dear Mr Johnson
The property at 15 Avalon Street IS zon-.'ld Medium High Density Residential (lMHDR) DIstnct
and IS consistent with its underlying land use desIgnation of Residential HIgh (RH) Category.
ThiS property is currently developed, based on records on file with the City, with a five-UJ11t
overmght acconll110datlon use Based on the size of the property and the permItted denslty under
the RH land use category of 30 umts per acre for dwellin~" a maximum of two units IS permitted
on this property Additionally, whtle an overnight accommodation use 1S listed as a perm1tted
FleXible Standard Development use In the MHDR District, the criteria for overmght
accommodauon uses reqUIre It to be accessory to the pnn(.Ipal use as a private resIdence Based
on the character of the eXlstmg use, 1he eXlstmg development does not comply with these
cntena As such, It IS the detenn11latlOn of the Pl.mnmg Department that the eXlstmg
development is a nonconformmg use and 1S also nonconforming to density This determmatlon
does not mclude any determination as to other aspects of potential nonconformity, such as
setback or parking requIrements
The property at 17 Avalon Street is ~ued MedIum Hlgh DensIty ReSIdential (MHDR) DIstnct
and IS consurtent w1th Its underlying land use deSIgnatiOn of ResidentIal High (RH) Category
ThIS property IS currently developed with one detached (!,ingle family) dwelltng Based on the
SIze of the property and the permItted density under the RJIland use category of 30 umts per acre
for dwellings, a maximum of two umts 15 permitted on thlS property The lot area does not
comply With Code requlrements for detached dwelhngs and 1S therefore deemed nonconformmg
J
The property at 16 Kendall Street IS primarily zoned Tounst (T) Distnct (south 87 feet) and is
conSistent WIth Its underlying land use deSIgnatiOn of Resort Facilines H1gh (RFH) Category
The northern 23 5 feet of thiS property 1S zoned MedIum HIgh Density ReSIdential (MHDR)
DIstne!, whIch IS conslstent With Its underlymg land use designabon of ResidentIal High (RH)
Category Thts property IS currently developed, based on records on file With the City, With a
I:lK1M/] AUNt" j. M^Yo~ (.LJM\1I"IONI I(
IloY! H^M11 lilt'<, VI( 1 MAW)K (OMMI"IONI11 WI LI INI Y GK^Y, ('OM>'\h,I"'j1 K
IlIJIt'< K 1111!n...I~1 1, CO\\MI"IONI I! $ [Jill 100,hON. CU\1MI"IOt>.1 H
'EnlJi\l r M 1'1 OVMI N I AND Al'llH\\A IIV, lV~ 1101' l:..'\\I'IOYl'!,"
. .
,'-
,
08~10-04
OS 26 am
Frcm-JOHNSON,POPF ~\
7274418617
T-468
P OUO~
F-5~O
August 3, 2004
TIm J obnson - Page 2
ten-unit overnIght accommodatlon use Based on the si.ze of the property am! the pemlltted
densIty under the RFH land use category of 40 rooms pet acre for overnIght accommodanon uses
and under the RH land llse category of 30 units per ac%"(: for dwellings, a maxunum. of three
overnight accommodatIOn uruts IS penmned on thIS property As such, It IS the determmatIon of
the Planmng Depanmem that the eXIstmg development IS nonconfomllng to density ThiS
determmatlon does not lllclude any detennmatlon as to other aspects ofpotentlal nonconformIty,
such as setback or parkmg Tequn'cments
All three propemes are located in, and require complIanc'e WIth, the "Old Florida" Dtstrict of
Beach by Dlwgn Based on the lot SIZI~S lIsted by the Pmellas County Property AppraIser of
3,175 square feet (50' x 63 5') for 15 Avalon Street. 4,350 square feet (50' x 87') for 17 Avalon
Street and 5,525 square feet (50' xl] 05') for 16 Kendall Street, which totals 13,050 square feet,
and the maximum denSIty of 30 dwellmg unltS per acre, these three propertIes combined may be
developed WIth a maximum ofelg;ht dwellIng unIts
As dIscussed, under the T erm.mation of S. tatus of NonconformIty prOVISIOn of Secnon 6.1 09 and
the converSIOn factor from overnight accommodatIon uses (40 rooms per acre) to dwelhngs (30
umts per acre), the 15 total overnIght ac(:ommodatIon tlmls at 15 Avalon Street and 16 Kendall
Street would conven to 11 dwelling un11:;. Addmg In the one dwellIng unit at 17 Avalon Street,
the total possible under thl~ scenano would be 12 dwelhng units, assummg the Termmanon of
Status of Nonconformity IS approved by the CommunI!) Development Board (COB) Other
factors of site and bUlldmg deSign, mcludmg setbacks, parkmg, heIght, etc, could affect the
declslon of the CDB.
Should you have any addItIonal questions) feci free to contact Wayne M. Wells, ATep, Planner
Ill, at 562-4504 OT myself at 562-4561
~~t~~
ASS1Stant Planning Duector
Cc Clup Gerlock, Development ReView Manager
Wayne Wells, Planner III
Message
Page] of3
d
,
Tarapani, Cyndi
From: Akm, Pam
Sent. Monday, August 09, 2004 11 30 AM
To: 'Roger Larson'
Cc' Tarapam, Cyndl, Horne, William
Subject. RE Beach parking lot
Also permitted are Governmental Uses which has a broad defimtlon ThIS all assumes current zonmg and Land
Use Plan Category
-----Ongmal Messagen.n
From: Roger larson [mallto Rogerl@Jpfirm.com]
Sent: Monday, August 09,20041034 AM
To: Akm, Pam
Cc: Tarapanl, Cyndl, Horne, Wilham
Subject: RE Beach parkmg lot
Pam Thanks for the commentary It seems that your response IS that vertlcle Improvements can occur on
the property, With the exception of a parking garage and Outdoor Recreatlon/Entertamment, whIch would
be precluded because of the proxImIty to reSIdential dlstnct Those vertlcle Improvements allowed would
be limited to Parks and Recreation FaCIlities, Public TransportatIon FaCIlitIes, Restaurants (IIrrnted to 25%
FAR), Retail Sales and Service, Utllltylnfrastructure FaCIlities and comprehensIve mfill redevelopment
projects All of these are possIble uses provided approved by the appropnate staff, COB, etc I believe
the height would be a determmatJon of staff and/or COB for these projects Is thiS reasonably accurate
given the knowledge we have of the property I Will try not to be a pest
Roger
Roger A Larson, EsqUIre
Johnson, Pope, Boko~
Ruppel & Bums, LLP
911 Chestnut Street
Clearwater, Flonda 33756
VOIce 727-461-1818
Fax 727-462-0365
roQerl@lpfirm com
nmOnglnal Messagem--
From: Pam.Akm@myClearwater.com [mallto Pam Akrn@myClearwater com]
Sent: Thursday, August 05,2004 3:25 PM
To: Roger Larson
Cc: Cyndl Tarapam@myClearwater.com, Wllham.Horne@myclearwatercom
Subject: RE: Beach parkmg lot
No, I do not believe so Park and Recreation facllrbes are permitted as a staff level approval
Governmental uses as permItted as flex standard Also Comp mfillls also permitted WIth COB
approval In short, If your quesbon IS whether your chent can reasonably expect that there WIll never
be vertical development the on City Parcel which lies between theIr property and the Gulf the
answer IS no While we have no current plans for development of the SIte, It would not be
reasonable to expect that the City WIll never place a structure on the Parcel
8/912004
Message
8/9/2004
Page 2 of3
-d--Ongmal Message--m
From: Roger Larson [mallto,Rogerl@Jpfirm com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 04,2004 4:48 PM
To: Akrn, Pam
Subject: RE: Beach parkmg lot
Pam Than k you for the response That clea rs up a few thrngs Secbon 2-1402 under the
Fexlbllty Cntena under paragraph B 1 suggests, however If the property IS located
conbguous to land whIch IS designated as residentIal In the Zoning Atlas, that development IS
not permitted Am I correct on this Issue?
In this Instance It does abut resldenballn part and tounst In part The Avalon property IS
MHDR
The plot thickens Let me know
Roger
Roger A Larson, Esquire
Johnson, Pope, Bokor,
Ruppel & Bums, LLP
911 Chestnut Street
Clearwater, Flonda 33756
VOIce 727-461-1818
Fax 727-462-0365
rOQerl@lpfirm com
-m-Onglnal Messagenm
From: Pam Akln@myClealWater com [mallto Pam Akln@myClealWater,com]
Sent: Monday, August 02,20042:12 PM
To: Roger Larson
Subject: RE: Beach parkmg lot
Roger, The memo IS not complete However, the answer to your
question IS yes The plat IndIcates that the City ParcellS approximately
125 feet by 175 feet The paved portion IS approximately 70 feet by
175 feet and currently proVides approxImately 33 parkIng spaces The
City ParcellS zoned OSR Permitted uses under the Land Development
Code Include parking, parking garage, recreation facIlitIes and
restaurants Due to the Charter restnctlon on recreatIon/open space
property, the City Parcel cannot be sold, leased or otherwise conveyed
without referendum, except under very limited circumstances
Additionally, there IS a restnctlve covenant that requires the City to get
the wntten consent of HUD before selling or leaSIng the property The
City does not currently have plans to develop the site
---nOnglnal Messagemn
From: Roger Larson [mallto,RogerL@JPfirm com]
Sent: Monday, August 02,20041'48 PM
To: Akm, Pam
Subject: Beach parkrng lot
Message
Page 3 of3
Pam You and I talked about a week ago about the legal status, zOning, ete of
a parking lot abutting the beach between Kendall Street and Avalon Street on
the beach My chent IS trying to determine lfthe CIty can bUIld anything on the
property that would preclude my clients from bUlldmg a condo overlooking the
gulf You mdlcated you were prepanng a memo on the subject for staff Is the
memo complete? If so may 1 have a copy
Roger
Roger A Larson, EsqUire
Johnson, Pope, Bokor,
Ruppel & Bums, LLP
911 Chestnut Street
Clearwater, Flonda 33756
VOIce 727-461-1818
Fax 727-462-0365
roaerl@IPfirm com
8/9/2004
May 03, 2004
..mat~
WHITE SANDS DEVELOPMENTS Ct - ~~
',' ~'
/11fhf;e
, /Iulr J1 ;;;
'.
"
(PrOject Development on the Beaches)
\ "
~ ~ ... '\ \ \ "
The City Manager,
100 S Osceola St
Clearwater,
Flonda
,,\ !
Dear Mr. Bill Horne, ? ~ :=. /~ /1; /1 ;Will&,
Re Property between Kendall and Avalon Street (3 adjacent pmpert,es) ~ / ih lq 'Z l. ~ 4/1
Request The proposal IS to provide a decorative roof covenng over the City Parking between Kendall & fllk
Avalon Street facing the GulfofMexlco ~1-
J2~1f
The advantage to the City IS to provide covered parkmg and to also I~rove dramatically the
appearance of the parkmg lot along the Beach (Lot 15 & 4) I",~ Cf'V ~....,t: /~...
I'
And also to bafully.landscape the lot on the N~ of Avalon Street, which IS also a pubhc
parkmg lot 71:J/j ~ ~ / /J-/~
Advantage
Our Proposal IS to bUild 18 condos of2500 sq ft each on 3 lots (Loll 5, 4, 5) We would like to take thiS
OppOrtunIty to work With your good self and the City of Clearwater We would be mterested m proVldmg
a covered parkmg lot on the beach Side between Kendall and Avalon Street and Landscapmg the parking
lot on the North of Avalon Street at our expense Also for long-tenn mamtenance we would be happy to
set up a fund With $25,000
From the CondommIUm stand pomt, thiS would Improve the view (not haVlng to look at a parking lot),
sound separation from the Parkmg lot and proVide pnvacy for the condominium owners
Please fInd attached drawmgs that our Architect has put together for your kmd perusal I am also
enclosmg hiS DIrect no 813 9686222 mcase you would like to further diSCUSS With him the aesthetIc
angle of the covered parkIng lot or landscapmg HIS name IS John Marshall Scott The roof deck will be a
decorative colorful surface With some landscapmg
I feel thiS would be a wm - wm SituaTIOn for the benefit of the CIty of Clearwater and the commumty In
general and for the condommlUm project that we are proposmg to bUild
J would also hke to thank you for the time and attentIOn and support you have gIven us at Chalets on
WhIte Sands which IS now well under Construction
J look forward to your contmued support You can always reach me on 727 480 3775 to answer any
quenes
Thankmg you,
Yours truly,
AOJ801 S. Abhyankar
514 Belle Isle Ave, Bellemr Beach, Flonda 33786
Telephone: 7274803775 Fax: 7275079563 emait: anjania@tampabay.rr.com
IJ;IYN .#Ju;~G J
~.~>>t14J;~
. , . ~- ~ - /fhmJ/JlNJ1?!iee. (prfu,h)
. \ ,Ytu ~ ;J; 111-1 Jvn ~
J0/l7nd -- 4tift;e..
"
" .... \. " ~ .. '\ \. ".. .....
.' I,
""..' \
.. .
, \
'"' '" ~ ''':'' t. ).
.. .
~ ~ ~~
..:~" ~ 1. 'iii ," ...... · ~.....~'
..r'~-
Wells, Wayne
From
Sent
To
Subject
Richter, Debbie
Tuesday, October 1 g, 20044 15 PM
Wells, Wayne
RE Resubmlttal of cases for October 19, 2004, CDS meeting
Guess I dldn t make your noon deadline Wayne but I've updated our comment Still not met, of course, but they've
given us the mfo needed I'll work with the owner outside of the DRC process now Thanks Wayne
-m-Onglnal Message-----
From Wells, Wayne
Sent Friday, October 15, 2004 6 52 PM
To Albee, RICk, Blackburn, Anne, Buysse, Beverly A , Colbert, Joseph, Dittmer, Arden, Dougall-Sides, Leslie, Tarapanl, CyndlJ Gerlock,
ChlPJ Glenn, Tom, Gluskl, Roberta, Haines, AngelJ Melone, DonaldJ MOrris, William D J Reynolds, Mike, Rice, Scott, Richter, Debbie,
Schodtler, John, Watkins, Sherry
Subject Resubmlttal of cases for October 19, 2004, CDB meeting
ORC members-
Plans for FLD2004-08059/TDR2004-08008, 15 Avalon Street, have been resubmitted for the 11/16/04 CDS meeting I
have p I aced one copy of the case res u b m Ittal package on the cab I nets outsld e of Roo m 216 I n our offIce for you r review
(please do not take It, as we need It for the CDS mall out) Please review your comments/conditIons for thIs case In Permit
Plan and determine If they are met Whether the conditions are "met" or stIli "not met," please let me know via emall
Please have these cases reVIewed by noon on Tuesday, October 19, 2004 I have to have the CDS agenda set and sent
to the Clerk on Thursday, October 21,2004
Thanks -
Wayne
1
Wells. Wayne
From
Sent
To
Subject
Rice, Scott
Monday, October 18, 2004 1 43 PM
Wells, Wayne
FLD2004-08059/TDR2004-08008, 15 Avalon Street
Wayne,
Engineering has completed review of the subject applicatIon PermIt Plan has been updated The follOWing need to be
Conditions of Approval
I Pnol to butld1l1g pell11lt, applicant must obtall1 easement from City for fire department conneUlon and
req Lllred pi ping
2 Pnor to butld1l1g pen11lt, sea-turtle fnendly light fixtules desIgn to be submitted to the Environmental
01 VISIon
3 PnOl to buildll1g petl11lt, provide SWFWMD Penmt or lettel of exemption
4 Twrtlc Impact fee to be detcII11Ined and paId pIlar to first Ce] tJ ficate of Occupancy
5 COnd0l11l11lUm plat to be recorded With Pmellas County pnor to fit st CertIficate of Occupancy
Let me know If you hdve any questions
D. Scott Rice
Land Devel. Engr. Manager
727-562-4781
scott.rice@MyClearwater.com
-----Onglnal Message-----
From Wells, Wayne
Sent Friday, October 15, 2004 6 52 PM
To' Albee, RiCk, Blackburn, Anne, Buysse, Beverly A , Colbert, Joseph, Dittmer, Arden, Dougall-Sides, Leslie, Tarapanl, Cyndl, Gerlock,
Chip, Glenn, Tom, Gluskl, Roberta, Haines, Angel, Melone, Donald, Morns, Wilham D , Reynolds, Mike, Rice, Scott, Richter,
Debbie, Schodtler, John, WatkinS, Sherry
Subject Resubmlttal of cases for October 19, 2004, CDB meeting
ORC members -
Plans for F L02004-08059/TO R2004-08008, 15 Avalon Street, have been resubm IUed for the 11/16/04 COB meeting
have pia ced one copy of the case res u b m IUal package on the ca bl nets au ts I de of Room 216 In ou r offIce for you r
review (please do not take It, as we need It for the COB mall out) Please review your comments/conditIons for this
case In Permit Plan and determine If they are met Whether the conditions are "met" or stili "not met," please let me
know via email Please have these cases revIewed by noon on Tuesday, October 19, 2004 I have to have the COB
agenda set and sent to the Clerk on Thursday, October 21,2004
Thanks -
Wayne
1
Wells, Wayne
From
Sent
To
Subject
Colbert, Joseph
Tuesday, October 19, 2004 10 20 AM
Wells, Wayne
RE Resubmlttal of cases for October 19, 2004, COB meetmg
Wayne the Fire Conditions have been met by the resubmlsslon of 10/12/04 and have
been changed In the activity and condition sections In Permit Plan Joe
mnOnglnal Messagemn
From Wells, Wayne
Sent Friday, October 15, 2004 6 52 PM
To' Albee, RiCk, Blackburn, Anne, Buysse, Beverly A , Colbert, Joseph, Dittmer, Arden, Dougall-Sides, leslie, Tarapam, Cyndl, Gerlock,
Chip, Glenn, Tom, Gluskl, Roberta, Haines, Angel, Melone, Donald, MOrris, William D , Reynolds, Mike, Rice, Scott, Richter,
Debbie, Schodtler, John, Watkins, Sherry
SubJect Resubmlttal of cases for October 19, 2004, CDB meeting
ORC members -
Plans for FLD2004-08059/TDR2004-08008, 15 Avalon Street, have been resubmitted for the 11/16/04 COB meetIng
have p I aced one copy of the ca se res u b m IUal package on the cabin ets outside of Room 216 In ou r office for your
review (please do not take It, as we need It for the COB mall out) Please revIew your comments/condItIons for thiS
case In Permit Plan and determine If they are met Whether the conditIons are "met" or still "not met," please let me
know via emall Please have these cases revIewed by noon on Tuesday, October 19, 2004 I have to have the CDS
agenda set and sent to the Clerk on Thursday, October 21,2004
Thanks -
Wayne
1
~
Owner(s)
Case Number FLD2004-08059 n 15 AVALON ST
Lamer Beach Club L1c
200 Bnghtwater Dr # 7
Clearwater, FI 33767
TELEPHONE No Phone, FAX No Fax, E-MAIL No Emal!
Allan] Crooker
16 Kendall Street
Clem water, F!33767-1G24
TELEPHONE No Phone, FAX No fax, E-MAIL No Emal!
Mcsmlth Inc
2440 Roberta Lane
Clearwater, FI33764-6585
rELEPHONE No Phone, FAX No Fax, E-MAIL No Emml
Aqua Sun Development, Llc
211 S Myrtle Avenue
Clealwalel, F133756
TELEPHONE 727-480-3775, r AX 727-595-3413, E-MAIL No Emal1
Housh Ghovaee
601 Cleveland Strtet
Clearwater, FI33755
TELEPHONE 727-443-2869, FAX 727-446-8036, E-MAIL nestech@nundspnng com
LocatIOn 0299 acres located between Avalon Street and Kendall Street, approxImately 200 feet west of Mandalay
A venue
Atlas Page 258A
ZOlllllg Dlstnct MHDR, MedIUm HIgh DenSity ReSidential
Request: (1) Termmatlon of Status of Nonconformity for denSity (15 overnight accommodatIOn umts - to be
converted 10 II dwellmg units), under the prOVISions of Section 6-109, (2) FleXible Development approval
to permit a IOta I of 13 attached dwelhngs 111 the MedIUm High DenSity Resldentml (MHDR) Dlstr d
T ounst (T) Dlslncl With reductions to lot area mlhe MHDR from 15,000 square feell 8 700
square feet and III the T Dlstnct from 10000 square feet t 4,350 sq Ie feet, reductions to lot \ III the
MHDR Dlstnct from 150 feet to 100 feet and III the T Dlst n J 00 feet to 50 feet, reductions to the
front (north along Avalon Street - M H DR Dlstnct) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet (to bUlldIllg) and flOm 25
feet to zero feet (to dumpster sraglllg pad), a reduction to the side (east - MHDR Dlstnct) from 10 feet to
97 feet (to buddmg), a reductIOn to the side (west - MHDR D1StflCt) from 10 feet to zero feet (to bUlldmg),
a reduction to the rear (south - M HDR Dlslnct) from 15 feet to 9 8 feet (to bulldmg), a rtductlon to the
front (south a long Ke ndall Stl eet - [ D Istnct) from I 5 feet 10 10 feet (to bu II d mg), d reductlQn to the side
(east - T Dlstnct) from 10 feel to 98 feet (to bulldmg), a reductlon to the side (west - T Dlstflct) flOm 10
feet to zero feet (to buildll1g), an mcrease 10 bUlldlllg height III the M HDR Dlstrlcl from 30 feet and III the T
Dlstnct from 35 feet to 69 5 feel (to roof deck) With peflmeter parapets of 3 67 feel (from roof deck) and
decoratIve roof structures of 10 I feet (from roof deck) and to permit a bUlldmg wnhlll the VISIbIlity
mangles, as a ReSidential Infill Project III the MHDR DIStllct and as a ComprehenSive Infill Redevelopment
Project 111 the 1 DIStllct, under the prOVISIOns of SectIons 2-404 F and 2-803 C, (3) A reduction to the front
pen meter buffer along A valon Street 111 the M H DR Dlstnct from 10 feet to zero feet (to dumpster staglllg
pad), a reductIOn to the side (east) landscape buffer m the MHDR District from 10 feet to 97 feet (to
buildll1g), a reductIOn to the side (west) landscape buffer 111 the MHDR DIstrict from 10 leet to zero feet (to
buddmg), and a reductIOn to the rear (south) landscape buffer lt1 the MHDR DIStnct from 10 feet to 9 8 feet
(to bwldlllg), as a Complehenslve Landscape Plan, under the provISions ofSecllon 3-1202 G, and (4) the
Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2004-0800S) of one dwelhng Ul1lt to thIS sIte from 321 Coronado
Dnve, under the prOVISions of Section 4- I 402
Propo~ed Use Attached dwellmgs
N el gh bor hood Clearwater Beach AssoCla tlon
AS~lJo..tlOn(s) Clearwater, Fl 33767
827 Mandalay Ave
TELEPHONE 727-446-5801, FAX No Fax, E-MAIL dmacnav@att net
Neighborhood Clearwater NeIghborhoods CoalitIOn
ASSOCIaTlOII(s) Cleal water, FI 33761
2544 Fusco Dnve
fELEPHONE 727-725-3345, FAX No Fax, E-MAIL DJw@gtc net
Presenter, Wayne Wells, Planner III
1 :45 pm
Owncr(s)
Owner(s)'
Applicant
Rcprc~el1 t,1 live
Development ReView Agenda - ThUlsday, October 7, 2004 ~ Page 26
R~'
, O. 7. K
D~
~~
Attendees Included' City Staff Gerlock, Wells, Rice, Colbelt, DIttmer, Hufford
Applicant/replesentatlve Housh Ghovaee, Debra Butler, Jolm Marshall Scott, AnJama Abhyankar, Peter Govetoso,
KaJpesh Patel, Jack DlbewrdIno, Roger Larson
1 he DRe revICwed thiS dpphcatlOn WIth the followmg comments
General Engmeenng,
I I) The minimum samtary sewer service IS 6" not 4" as shown
2) rhe proposed fire hydrants to be a mlnllUUm of 15 ft from any structure
3) The fire department connectIOn 10 be a nUnllTIUm of 15 ft flOm any struGtun:
4) Proposed domestIc water meter to be field located Meter cannot be placed within any
concrete
5) No bUIlding projectIOns shall be constructed wlthm aIr space of the adjacent property on the
west
G) Need to label area east ofJamp wIthin the slIucl1lre
7) A 4 ft SIdewalk WIll be reqlllred wlthmlhe nght-of-way of Kendall Street and A valon Street
All of the above to be addlessed pnor to COB
Pllor to C 0
]) fll1ul condol1lmum plat to be recorded
E nVI ro nmen 1.11
PnOI to blllldll1g pell11lt, Sea-tmlle fnendly light fixtures design to be submitted to the
Envllonmental DIVISIOn, please refer to SectIOn 3-1302 subsections C and 0
Fire
Show FOC at least 15 feel from the blllldll1g and wlthm 40 feet of a FIl e Hydrant dedicated 10
the FIre Spnnkler System Pnor to COB
2 Where undelground waler mams and hydJants are to be mstalled, they shall be Installed,
completed, and m service pnor to constructIon as pef NFl' A 241 Please acknowledge pRlOR
TO COB
3 The City Parkll1g Lot must remam wnh at least a 24 foot dnve WIdth up to a heIght of at least 14
feet between any roof lines The roofs must not lI1terfere wIth the turn radIUS of emergency
vehIcles
4 ThiS DRC ReVIew by Fire IS not an approval or review of any construction plans or documents
other than site work PLEASE ACKNOWLEDGE
H,lrbor Master'
] No Issues
Legal'
I No Issues
Lmd Resourees'
] No Issues
La ndsca pi ng,
I There IS an extens I ve area III front of the entry to the north s Ide whIch could have add 1 tlOnal
1 andsca pc ma lena Is Illsta lied m It
2 Per SeclIon 3-1204 0 al1landscapmg must be protected from vehIcular and pedestnan traffic
by the Illstallatlon of curbmg and wheel stops, or other protectIve deVIces along the pellluctcr of
any landscapmg which adJ oms vehicular use at eas and Sidewalks These protCCII ve deVices
shall have a rmmmum heIght of SIX lllchc~ above grade
3 Plan does not meet the reqUirements of penmeter plantmgs m Code SectIon 3-1202 0
There IS a large portIon of bUlldmg m Ihe reqUIred buffer area to the west of the bUlldmg m the
MHDR zonmg dlstnct ReVise plan to Install tIns buffer area
Parks and RClfCdllOn,
I ClaJlfica tlOll IS needed on the # of resldentm I Ulllts eXls tll1g (10 or 15) and proposed (11 OJ 13)
Open Space and RecrealJon Impact Fees are due pnor to Issuance of blllldll1g perrmts or final
plat (If applIcable) whichever occurs first These fees could be substantIal and It IS
reGommended that you contact Deb RIchter at 727-562-4817 to calculate the assessment
S tu rmw a ler:
Pnor to Issuance of a bUlldmg permit the relentlOn IS to be enlarged to accomodate a 50 yr
des Ign storm With 1/2 foot of freeboard Engmeer IS to proVide a soil percolatlOn test to show
that pond WIll dram down III 24 hours
Sohd Waste:
Development ReView Agenda - Thursday, Octobel 7, 2004 - Page 27
10/7/04 - TJG
In lIeu of provldmg recyclIng contall1ers, wIll pay monthly recyclIng fee per umt
9/22/04 - TJG
Please show where recyclIng contamers wIll be placed
Traffic Engmeenng
I StrategIcally locate disabled parkmg space to nearest accessIble entrance to comply WIth
Chapter II FlOrIda Buldll1g Code for BUlldmg ConstructIOn Section 11-4 6 2
2 Parallel parkmg spaces must comply With CIty standards 8' feet x 23' feet These spaces are
along an mclIne, demonstrate how they may be used safely and the method of egress
3 Covered parkll1g space must not have columns /posts mtrudmg m 9 feet' x 19' feet parkmg
stalls No spaces may be lost due to structure PARKING COVER TO BE REMOVED THIS
WILL BE ADDRESSED fN A FUTURE APPLICA nON
4 The letter states" sound separatIOn from the parkmg lot "WIll there be a wall or fence
along the east Side of the parkll1g lot and how WIll that affect the parkmg meters') P ARKfNG
COVER TO BE REMOVED THIS WILL BE ADDRESSED IN A FUTURE APPLICA nON
5 How will the eXlstmg lIghtll1g at the parkmg lot be affected (turtle frIendly lIghts)?
PARKING COVER TO BE REMOVED THIS WILL BE ADDRESSED IN A FUTURE
APPLICA nON
6 Who IS responSIble for mamtenance/damage/vandalIsm of the structure at the parkmg lot?
PARKfNG COVER TO BE REMOVED THIS WILL BE ADDRESSED IN A FUTURE
APPLICATION
7 The letter mentIons landscapmg the north half of the lot Dependmg of the level of
landscapmg, who wIll be responSIble for the loutme mall1tenece costs PARKING COVER 1 0
BE REMOVED THIS WILL BE ADDRESSED fN A FUTURE APPLICATION
8 WIll the clearance m the parkmg lot be suffiCIent to allow the City street sweepers access?
PARKfNG COVER TO BE REMOVED THIS WILL BE ADDRESSED IN A FUTURE
APPLICATION
9 The SIght trIangles on the north drIveway are drawn mcorrectly It appears that portIons of the
structures will encroach mto the SIght trIangles, demonstrate that the drIveways can operate
safely Of partIcular concern IS the south drIveway and the traffic from the publIc parkmg lot
10 Measures (slgnage) must be prOVided to IdentIfy the parkmg lot as publIc PARKfNG
COVER TO BE REMOVED THIS WILL BE ADDRESSED fN A FUTURE APPLICATION
II All of the above to be addresed pi lor to CDB
Planmng
Development RevIew Agenda - ThUlsday, Octobel 7,2004 - Page 28
1 Revise the engmeenng bar scale left of the zero mark to change from '40" to "20" feet
2 Revise the applicatIOn and the Letter of AuthonzatlOn to mdlcate the property owner of 15
Avalon IS Lamer Beach Club LLC (200 Bnghtwater Dnve, #7, Clearwater, FL 33767-2452),
accordmg to the Pmellas County Property Appraiser with a sale date m March 2004 with a
recorded deed (not B & R Beach Holdlllgs, LLC)
3 Provide public sidewalk along Avalon Street frontage
4 10/7/04 - WW
ConstructIOn of carports on City property, at the setbacks presently shown, will reqUire the filing
of a separate Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project FleXible Development applicatIOn, to
be consldeled completely separate from thiS development, and will have no bearmg on the
deCISion by staff or the CDB on thiS development (stands on ItS own ments) As a separate
application, the FLD case for the attached dwellmgs can move forward on ItS own, or be delayed
until the FLD case for the carports on City property catches up so that both cases are on the same
COB agenda FOI the attached dwelling FLD case, the carports must be eIurunated from the site
plan and elevatIOns (smce It must be a separate case) Mike QUillen m Engmeenng would be the
person to sign the AffidaVit Authonzmg Agent on behalf of the City (owner)
9/7 /04 - WW
Proposalmcludes constructmg carports over eXlstmg parkmg spaces m City-owned parkmg lot to
west of subject site City pr operty IS zoned Open Space and Recreation (OSR) Dlstnct Use of
the City property IS "parkmg garage and lots" Proposed carports do not meet fIOnt (north along
A valon Street and south along Kendall Street) setback of 25 feet, or lO-foot Side setback As
such, to construct such Improvements on the City-owned property Will reqUire the filmg of a
ComprehenSive Infill Redevelopment Project applicatIOn, which Will also need to mclude
deviatIOns to bemg adjacent to reSidentially-zoned property and to Improvmg the frontages along
A valon and Kendall Streets to be Similar m char acter to uses and structures frontmg on each
street for a distance of 250 feet It IS also unclear at thiS pomt m time that the City IS WIlling to
accept such Improvements to ItS property and what form (design) of such Improvements would be
acceptable
5 ReVise VISibility tnangles on Kendall Street on Sheet L1 I (measured along front property Ime,
not the roadway curb)
6 Sheet C3 1 - "approximately 38 spaces" are mdlcated on the City-owned parkmg lot to the west,
yet only 35 spaces are shown Venfy number and show accurately
7 Show locatIOn of mtenor landscape areas crosshatched or shaded
8 Dm1enslon depth of cantilevered balcomes from face of the bUlldmg
9 Identify on Sheets A4 and AS the proposed colors of the bUlldlllg and architectural elements
10 ReVise "DescnptlOn of Requests" m Exhibit A to that mdlcated by staff, mcludmg the
JustificatIOn for each reductIOn or mcrease requested III all appropnate cntena
11 Address eXlstmg and proposed signage
12 ReVise "Descnptlon of Request" m Exhibit A to mclude the eXlstmg five umt overnight
acconm10datlons at 15 Avalon Street to be demolished m the first sentence
13 ReVise narrative under #3 of "Wlltten Subnuttal ReqUirements" Visibility triangles are not bemg
observed, as the proposed buildmg mtrudes mto the VISibility tnangles on Avalon and Kendall
Streets
14 Address the cntena of Secl10n 6-109 C for TernunatlOn of Status ofNonconfornuty m relatIOn to
tlus proposal
15 10/6/04 - WW
Transfer of Development Rights - The sendmg site is presently not vacant It has been developed
With a duplex (two umts) The sendmg site has been approved as a temporary constructIOn/real
estate office for Rogers Beach Development, With the mtentlon to envelop the sendmg site With
addlt10nal propelty for redevelopment purposes Based on the sendmg lot size of 0 15 I-acre and
30 ul1lts/acre, the sendmg site could be developed for a maXImum of four dwelling Ul1lts The
transfer one Ul1lt to thIS site may be requested
9/7/04 - WW
Transfer of Development RIghts - It IS mdlcated that the sendmg property IS developed With a
conunerclal bUlldmg that presently does not have any tenants The SIte IS not vacant Applicant
must calculate the mixed-use calculatlon of nonresidential and reSidential to deternune if there
are any dwellmg umts available on thiS sendmg parcel to be transferred to the subject property
16 Transfer of Development Rights - PrOVide the full address for the owner of the sender site
17 Transfer of Development Rights - It IS mdlcated that Roland Rogers IS the owner of the sender
Site, however, the deed subnutted IS neither Signed nor recorded Submit recOlded deed or revise
applicatIOn to current owner With appropnate documentation for sender
Development ReView Agenda - Thursday, October 7,2004 - Page 29
18 Transfer of Development R.1ghts - Complete the applicatIOn under' I\..t:celver site" for the "current
use of the property" to mdlcate 15 overmght accommodatIOn umts + one dwelhng umt
19 Setback reductIOns are slgmficant, espeCially on the west side where a zero setback IS requested
I n additIOn, the size of the parcel and lot wIdth reductIOn requests are less than the standards set
fOl th III the Zomng D Istncts Contnbutll1g factors to these concerns may Il1clude, but may not be
hmlted to, the size of the umts proposed (Umts A & B greater than 3,000 squale feet, Umts C
over 2,300 square feet), the request to Termll1ate the Status ofNonconfonruty for 15 overnight
aCLOrnmodJ.tlon umts to be convcrted to 11 dwellmg umts (otherwise at 30 dulacre would
produce only eIght pemutted dwelhng umts) and the transfer of development nghts of one Ul1It
The Old Flonda Dlstnct hnuts height to "low to nud-nse" Blllldmg height IS proposed at 69 5
feet from BFE to roof deck 10 date, the tallest structure proposed or approved wlthm this
DlstlICt IS 69 5 feet from BFE to the roof deck (La Rlsa, 650 Bay Esplanade), which had varymg
I oof deck bUlldmg heights, with 69 5 bemg the tallest roof height (57% of total I oaf area) Other
lOaf heIghts wele 58 5 feet, 48 feet and 37 5 feet above BFE) fhe project at 14 Somel set was
apPlOved at 56 feet III height -1 he pI oJect at 15 Somerset was approved at 61 66 feet III height
Potentia lly too many umts are bemg proposed or a dlffel ent des Ign would be mOl e acceptab Ie
Sta ff wlll not support the proposed he Ight and plOposed setbacks
20 ProvIde on Sheet Al the umt SIzes for VnllS A, Band C
21 PrQvIdG narrdtlve documentmg that thl~ proposed bUlldmg will also meet I3111ldll1g Code
reqUIrements for the square foolage of openmgs allowed on each side based on the setbacks
proposed
Other'
No Comments
Notes' To be placed on the 11/16/04 COB agenda, subnutl5 collated caples of the reVised plans & apphcatlOn material addressing all
above departments' commenls by noon, 10/14/04 Packets shall be collated, folded and stapled as appropnate
Development ReView Agenda - Thursday, October 7,2004 - Page 30
,
0"" nor( s),
Case Number FLD2004-01:>v)9 -- 15 A V ALON S r
Lamer Beach Club Llc
200 Bnghtwater Dr # 7
Clearwater, F133767
TELEPHONE No Phone, FAX No Fax, E-MAIL No Emall
Allan J Crooker
16 Kendall Street
Cleanvater, Fl 33767-1624
TELEPHONE No Phone, FAX No Fax, E-MAIL No Emall
ML~mIth lnc
2440 Roberta Lane
CleaIMI\eT, F133764-6585
TELEPHONE No Phone, FAX No Fax, [-MAIL No Emml
Aqua Sun Development, LIc
211 S Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Fl33756
TeLEPHONE 727-480-3775, FAX 727-595-3413, E-MAIL No Emall
Housh Ghovaee
601 Cleveland St]eet
Clearwater, Fl33755
1 ELEPHONE 727-443-2869, FAX 727-446-8036, E-MAIL nestech@llimdsprmg lOm
LocatIOn' 0299 acres located between Ava/on Street dnd Kendall Street, applO"unately 200 feet west ofManda/ay
A venue
Atlas Page 258A
Zonmg DistrICt. MHDR, MedlUlli HIgh Density Res]dentlal
Request (]) Termmatlon of Status of Nonconformity for denSity (15 ovcrl11ght accommodatIOn Units - to be
converted to I ] dwelling units), under the provIsions of Secllon 6-109, (2) FleXible Development approval
to pennl! a total of 13 attached dwelhngs In the Medium High DenSity ReSIdential (MHDR) Dlstnct and
] oumt (T) Dlstnct With reductions to lot area III the MHDR Dlstnct from 15,000 square teet to 8,700
square feet and III the T Dlstnct from 10,000 square feet to 4,350 square feet, reductIons to lot Width III the
MHO R D]stnct I rom 150 feet to 100 feet and m the T D Istnct from 100 feet to 50 feet, reduCllons to the
Front (north along A valon Street - MHDR Dlstnct) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet (to bUlldmg) and from 25
feet to zero feet (to dumpster stagmg pad), a reductlOn to the SIde (east + MHDR Dlstnct) from] 0 feet to
9 7 feet (to bUlldmg), a reductlOn to the Side (west - MHDR Dlstnct) from 10 feet to zero feet (to bulldmg),
a reduction to the rear (south - MI-IDR Dlstnct) from 15 feet to 9 8 feet (to bUl]dmg), a reductIOn to tIle
front (south along Kendall Street - T DIstrIct) trom 15 feet to 10 feet (to bUlld1l1g), a reductIOn to the Side
(east - T Dlstnct) from 10 feet to 9 8 feet (to building), a reductIOn to the Side (west - T Dlstnct) h om 10
feet to zero feet (to bUlldmg), an III crease to bUIlding height In the MHDR Dtstnct from 30 feet and III the I
Dlstnct from 35 feet to 695 feet (to roof deck) With penmeter parapets of3 67 feet (from roof deck) and
decorative roof structures of 10 I feet (from roof deck) and to permit a bulldlllg w]thlll the VISibility
tflungles, a~ a Res]dentmllnfill Project 1Il the MHDR Dlstnct and as a ComprehenSive Infill Redevelopment
Project III the r D]stnct, under the provlslOn~ of SectIOns 2-404 F and 2-803 C, (3) A reduction to the front
penmeler buffer along Avalon Street m the MHDR Dlstnct Ii om 10 feet to zero feet (to dumpster stagmg
pad), a red uctlOn to the Side (easl) landscape buffet m the M H D R D ]stnct from I 0 feet to 9 7 feet (to
buildmg), a reductlon to the Side (west) landscape buffer III the MHDR Dlstnct from 10 feet to zet 0 feet (to
bUlldmg), and a reductlOn to the rear (south) landscape buffer 1I1 the MHDR Dlstnct from 10 feet to 9 8 feel
(to bu 11 d mg), as a Comprehens Ive Land~capc PI an, under the prov I s lOllS of SecllOn 3 -12 02 G, and (4) the
T ranster 0 f Deve !opm ent Rights (TO R2004-0 8008) of one dwe 1 I I ng un]t to thiS site from 321 Coronado
Dnve, under the prOV1SIons of Section 4-1402
Proposed Use Attached dwellings
N CI g h bor hood Clearwater Beach Assoc mtJon
Assocl3tlOu(s): Clearwater, FI 33767
827 Mandalay Ave
TELEPHONE 727-446-5801, FAX No Fax, E-MAIL dmacnav@attnet
NClghborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods CoalitIOn
ASsocl3tlOn(s)' Clearwater, FI33761
2544 Fnsco Dnve
TELePHONE 727-725-3345, FAX No Fax, E-MAIL OJw@gtc net
Presenter Wayne Wells, Planner III
1 '45 pm
Owncr(s),
Owner(s)
Applicant
Rcpresen ta II \ e
Development Rev]ew Agenda - Thulsday, October 7, 2004 - Page 26
})~*
'Q..,.O+-
\)~
~~t
-
-
~..,,\U \
"
Attendees Included City ~Idtf ChIp Gerlock, Wayne Wells, Scott Rice, Joe ......olbert
Apphcant/representatlve Housh Ghovaee, Debra Butlel, DOIeen Wllhams, John Marshall Scott, AI~ama Abhyankar,
Peter Govetoso, Kalpesh Patel, Some! Abhyankar, Rich Kelley
'I he DRe reviewed thl-" apphlutlOn With the followmg comments'
General Engmeermg'
1 I) The nummum samtary sewel sel vice IS 6" not 4" as shown
2) The plOposed fire hydranls to be a mllumum of 15 ft from any structure
3) The fire depaltment connection to be a nummu of 15 ft from any structure
4) Proposed domestic waler meter to be field located Meter CalillOt be placed \Vlthm any
conCI ete
5) No bUlldmg plOjeetlOns shall be constructed wlthm air space of the adjacent properly on the
west
6) Need to label area east oframp wlthm the structure
7) A 4 ft SIdewalk Will be reqUlred wllhm the nght-of-way of Kendall Street and Avalon Street
All of the above to bc addle~~ed pnor to COB
PllOl to C 0
1) Fmal condonunum plat to be recorded
E nVI ronmen ta I'
Pnor to bUlldmg pernllt, Sea-turtle fnendly I1ght fixtUl es design to be subl11ltled 10 the
Environmental DIVISIOn, please refer to SectIOn 3-1302 subsectIons C and D
Fire,
Show FDC at least 15 feet from the bUlldmg and wlthm 40 feet ofa Fire Hydrant dedicated to
the Fire Spnnklel System Pnor to COB
2 Where underground water mams and hydrants ale to be IIlstalled, they shall be mstalled,
completed, and 111 service pnor to constructIOn as pel NFP A 241 Please acknowledge PRIOR
1'0 COB
3 The City Parkmg Lot must remam With at least a 24 foot dnve Width up to a height of at least 14
feet between any roof lmes The roofs must not mleriere With the turn radIUS of emergency
vehicles
4 TIllS ORe Review by File I~ not an dpproval or review of any constructIon plans 01 documents
other than sile work PLEASE ACKNOWLEDGE
Harbor Master'
1 No Issues
Legal'
1 No Issues
Land Resources
No Issues
Landslupmg:
I There IS an extenSive area m fIonl of the entry to the north Side whIch could have additIOnal
landscape matenals Installed III 11
2 Per SectIOn 3-1204 0 alllandscapl ng must be protected from vehicular and pedes tnan traffic
by the mstallatIon of curbmg and wheel stops, or other protectIve devlccs along the penmeter of
any landscaplllg w111ch adJollls vehicular use areas and Sidewalks These protectIve deVices
shall have a nUl1lmum he1ght of SIX lllches above grade
Plan does not meet the reqUIrements of pellmeter plantmgs 111 Code SectIOn 3-1202 0
Thel e IS a large portlOn of bUlldmg In the reqUlred buffer area to the west of the blllldmg m the
MHDR zonmg dlstllet RevI"e plan to ll1stall thIS buffer area
Parks and Recreation
I Clanftca tlOn IS needed on the # of resldentJa I umts eXlstll1g (10 or 15) and proposed (11 or I 3)
Open Space and RecreatlOn Impact Fee" are due pnor 10 Issuance of bulldmg permIts or final
plat (If apphcable) wlllchevel occurs filst These fees could be substantlUl and It IS
recommended that you contact Deb Richter at 727-562-4817 to calculate the assessment
S to rro\\ a ter:
PnOI to Issuance of a bmldmg perrrut the retentIOn IS to be enlarged to accomodate a 50 yr
deSign storm w1th 1/2 foot of freeboard Engmeer IS to proVIde a SOlI percolatIOn test to show
that pond will drum dOWIlll1 24 hours
Solid Wastc'
1 Please show where Recyclll1g contall1ers will be placed
~
.)
Development ReVIew Agenda - Thmsday, Oelober 7, 2004 - Page 27
Traffic Engmeermg
I I Strategically locate disabled parkmg space to nearest accessible entrance to comply with
Chapter 11 Flonda Buldmg Code for BUlldmg ConstructlOn SectlOn 11-462
2 Paralle] parkmg spaces must comply wlth city standards 8' feet x 23' feel These spaces are
along an lllchne, demonstrate how they may be used safely and the method of egress
3 Cove] ed parkmg space must not have columns Iposts mlrudmg m 9 feet' x 19' feet parkmg
stalls No spaces may be lost due to structure
4 The letter states" sound separatIOn from the palklng lot" Will there be a wall OJ fence
along the east sIde of the parkmg lot and how W]1l that affect the parkmg meters?
5 How wIll the eXlstlllg l1ghtmg at the parkmg ]ot be affected (turtle fnendly lights)?
6 Who]s responSible for mamtenanceldamage/vandaltsm of the structure at the parkmg lot?
7 The letter mentIons landscapmg the north half of the lot Dependmg of the level of
landslapmg, who Will be responSible for the routllle mallltenece costs
8 W]II the clearance m the parkmg 101 be sufficient to allow the City street sweepers ac(,ess?
9 The sight tnangles on the north dn veway al e drawn mcorrectl y It appears that portIons of the
structures will encroach mto the sight tnangles, demonstrate that the dnveways can operate
safely Of particular concern IS the south dnveway and the traffic from the pubhc parklllg lot
10 Measures (slgnage) must be proVIded to Ident]fy the parkmg lot as pubhc
\1 All of the above to be addrcsed pnor to CDB
PI,llllllng.
Development Rev]ew Agenda - Thursday, October 7,2004 - Page 28
I Revise the engmeenng bar scale left of the zero mark to change frow '40" to "20" feet
2 Rev\:,e the apphcatlOn and the Letter of AuthonzatlOn to mdlcate the property owner of 15
Avalon IS Lamer Beach Club LLC (200 Bnghtwater Dnve, #7, Clearwater, FL 33767-2452),
accordmg to the Pmellas County Property AppraIser with a sale date III March 2004 With a
recorded deed (not B & R Beach Ho]dmgs, LLC)
3 Provide public sIdewalk along Ava]on Street frontage
4 Proposalmcludes constructmg carports ovel eXlstmg parkmg spaces m City-owned parkmg lot to
west ofsubJcct site City property 1S zoned Open Space and RecreatIOn (OSR) DIShlct Use of
the City property IS "parkmg garage and lots" Proposed carports do nol meet front (north along
A valon Street and south along Kendall Street) setback of 25 feet, or 1 O-foot SIde setback A~
:,uch, to construct such Improvements on the City-owned property will reqUire the filmg ofa
Comprehensive ]nfil1 Redevelopment Project applicatIOn, which WIll also need to mclude
devlalIon~ to belllg adjacent to resldentldlly-zoncd plOperty and to Improvmg the frontages along
A valoll and Kendall S ITeets to be Sl mllal 111 character to uses and stlUctures frontmg on edch
street for a distance 0 f 250 fcet It IS also unclear at this pam! III tIme that the City IS Will Illg to
dccept such Improvements to It~ plOperty and what iorm (design) of such Improvements would be
aCleptable
5 ReVise VISibIlity tnangles on Kendall Street on Sheet L 1 1 (measured along front property Illle,
not the roadway curb)
6 Sheet C3 1 - "approximately 38 spaces" are llldlcated on the CIty-owned parkll1g lot to the west,
yet only 35 spaces are shown Venfy number and show accurately
7 Show 10catlOn of Il1tenor landscape areas crosshatched or shaded
8 DimenSIOn depth of canttlevered balcOnies from face of the bUlldll1g
9 IdentIfy on Sheets A4 and AS the proposed colors of the bUlldmg and architectural elements
10 RevI:,e "DescnptlOn of Reque"ts" III ExhIbit A to that mdlcated by staff, mdudmg the
]ustdicatlOn for each reduction or muea"e requested mall appropnate cntena
] 1 Address eXlstmg and proposed Slgnage
12 ReVise "DescnptlOn of Request" m ExhibIt A to mclude the eXlstmg five umt overnIght
accommodations at IS Avalon Street to be demolished il1 the first sentence
13 ReVIse narra live under #3 of "W II Iten Subnuttal ReqUlrements" V IS 1 bill ty tnangles are not belllg
observed, as the proposed bUlldlllg Il1trudes mto the VISl bill ty tnangles on A va Ion and Kendall
Streets
14 Address the cntena of SectIOn 6-109 C for TernunatlOn of Status ofNonconfotnuty 111 relatIOn to
thIS proposal
15 ]0/6/04 - WW
Transfer of Development Rights - The sendmg sIte IS presently not vacant It has been developed
WIth a duplex (two umts) The sendmg site has been applOved as a temporary constructIOn/rea]
estate office fOJ Rogers Beach Development, WIth the mtentlOn to envelop the sendlllg sIte WIth
addl tlOna I property fot redevelopment purposes Based on the sendmg lot size of 0 I 5 I-acre and
30 ul11tslacre, the sendll1g site could be developed for a maximum of four dwellmg umts The
transfer one umt to thiS site may be requested
917/04 - WW
Transfer of Development Rights - It IS Indicated that the sendmg property I~ developed With a
commerCia] bUlldmg that presently does not have any tenants The slte IS not vacant Applicant
must calculate the l111xed-use calculatIon of nonreSidential and reSidential to determme If there
are any dwelhng umts aVailable on thiS sendmg paIce] to be transferred to the subject property
] 6 Transfel of Development RIghts - PlOvlde the full address far the owner of the sendel sIte
] 7 Tramfer of Development Rights - It IS mdlcated that Roland Rogers IS the o'wnel of the sender
SllC, however, the deed sublllltted IS neither Signed nor reGarded Submit lecorded deed or revise
apphcatlOn to current owner With appropnate documentation for sender
18 fransfer 01 Deve]opment Rights - Complete the appllcatlOn under "Receiver sIte" for the "cullent
use of the property" to mdlcate I 5 overnight accommodatIOn UnIts + one dwe lhng UnIt
Development ReView Agenda - ThUlsday, October 7,2004 - Page 29
19 Setback reductlOn~ are slgmficant, espeelJlIy on the west sIde where d zero setback IS requested
In addItIOn, the ~Ize of the paree 1 and lot width reductIOn requests are less than the standards set
forth m the Zonmg DlstnUs Contnbutmg faetOl" to these concerns may mclude, but may not be
[muted to, the Size of the UllltS proposed (Ul11ts A & B greater than 3,000 square feet, Umts C
over 2,300 square feet), the request to Termmate the Status ofNonconforrruty for 15 overnight
acconm10ddtloll UllltS to be converted to 11 dwelhng UllltS (otherwise at 30 du/acre would
produce only eIght pemutted dwellmg Units) and the transfer of development nghts of one UlIlt
fhe Old Flonda Dlstnct hmlts height to "low to mld-nse" BUlldmg heIght IS plOposed at 69 5
feet from BFE to roof deck To date, the tallest structUle proposed or approved wlthm thIS
Dlstnct IS 69 5 feet from BFE to the roof deck (La Rlsa, 650 Bay Esplanade), which had varylllg
roof deck bUlldmg heights, wIth 69 5 bemg the tallest roof height (57% of total roof drea) Other
roofhelght~ were 585 feet, 48 feet and 37 5 feet above BFE) The project at 14 Somerset was
apprO\ ed at 56 feet III height The project at 15 Somerset was approved at 6] 66 feet 111 height
PotentIally 100 many UllltS are bemg proposed or a different deSIgn would be mOle acceptable
StdffwlIl not support the proposed heIght and proposed sethdcks
20 ProvIde on Sheet A 1 the UllIt SIzes for UllltS A, Band C
21 PlOvlde ndlTatlve documentlllg that thiS proposed bUlldmg WIll also meet BUlldmg Code
legulI tments for the square footage of opelllng" allowed on each SIde based on the setbacks
proposed
Other,
No Conmlents
Notes To be placed on the 11116/04 COB agenda, submit 15 collated cople~ of the revised plans & apphcatlOn matenal addressmg all
above depalllllLnts' comments by noon, 10/14/04 Packets shall be collated, folded and stapled as appropnate
Development ReVIew Agenda - fhursday, October 7,2004 - Page 30
Wells, Wayne
From
Sent
To
Cc
Subject
Tarapanl, Cyndl
Tuesday, October 05, 2004203 PM
Wells, Wayne, Gerlock, Chip, Bruch, Tracey, Quillen, Michael, Rice, Scott
Arasteh, Mahshld, Akin, Pam, Haines, Angel, Brumback, Garry
Avalon-City parkmg lot
1 am \\ lIong to con firm the conversation today duung the Strategy meeting The Cll:) will e.ontmue to dt~cuss the
pos~lbillty of the. pallung lot ImplOVeme11t~ at th1S Slte wIth the developer It 15 lecogruze.d that there aLe staff
concern:o. about It and these Issues should contl11ue to be dtscussed with the developer to see If rcsolutlon of the
l~~ue::. can occur In addmon to the parkIng and operational Issues, we need Pam's assIstancc on the hab1bty 1ssues
and the. type. of agleeme.nr that would be needed to effcct tlus ThlOugh tlus e-matl, 1 am askmg Angel to ::.et a
meeong WIth Pan, and all above who want to be Il1cludeu to dIscm~ the. agreement l:,sue~ Meeting should be set
fOl ne. '-I wed" If pO'>'>lblc WI th e Vet vane'" "cheuulc
Smce the ueveloper docs not own the parkmg lot nOl has the owner (Clt:y) comentcd to the application, the parkmg
lot part of the project IS ll1sufficlCnt and must be separated from the condo part of the project The developer may
PUlSUC the condo project now to CDB by deleting thc proposed carpOlts from the site plan A separate N.GW
appl1canon must be filed by the developel and sIgned b) the CIl)' as owner fOl the carpOlt pornon of the project
and thiS will be lCVle\ved pur:o.uant to the regular DRC process aq a new appl1catJon AltelOative1y, the developc!
may delay the condo pOltJon of the portIOn until the carport part catches up after the City developme.nt of an
agleunent samfactory to allmvolved In tlu:. alte1l1anve, the two part" of the project would procecd rogethu
If you haye '1ny quesnons 01 fuuher comments, plea"e let me or Wayne knmv ThiS proce:." should be
commurllcated to the developer at the DRC meenng on Thu1sday Thanks
Cyndl Tarapa11l
Plannmg DlIectOt
(727)562-4547
c.; ndl tatapaJ11@T'vlyClearwater com
1
.
1
Page 1 of 3
Wells, Wayne
From Garnott, Kevin
Sent Tuesday, October 05, 2004 10 55 AM
To Wells, Wayne
Cc Tarapanl, Cyndl, Gerlock, ChIp, RIce, Scott, QUIllen, Michael, Bruch, Tracey, Kronschnabl, Jeff
Subject RE 15 Avalon (FLD2004-0B059)
#3 Wind design speed for that area IS 130 mph
--mOnglnal Message-nn
From: QUillen, MIchael
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 10 02 AM
To: Wells, Wayne, Bruch, Tracey
Cc: Tarapanl, Cyndl, Gerlock, ChIp, RIce, Scott, Garnott, Kevin
Subject: RE 15 Avalon (FLD2004-08059)
I have added my thoughts In red below Tracey- please add to them Scott has a copy of the latest
submittal, but If I remember right It Just shows a schematIC
m--Onglnal Message-m-
From: Wells, Wayne
Sent: Tuesday, October OS, 2004 B 09 AM
To: Bruch, Tracey, QUIllen, Michael
Cc: Tarapanl, Cyndl; Gerlock, ChIp
Subject: RE 15 Avalon (FLD2004-08059)
Tracey/MIke -
I have raised the questIon of what department IS responsible for the property to the applicant (thIS IS
why you are getting the emall request) Whatever department IS responsible, then that department
head would need to sign the affidaVit to authOrize an agent on behalf of the owner (the City) to allow
someone to request to Improve our property As user department, Engineering would be
responsible With me signing The follOWing questions are pertinent to the Issue
1 Does the City even want the proposed carports? That would be up to Tracey I guess we would
accept them subject to satisfactory responses to Tracey's earlier comments, particularly regarding
long term maintenance
2 What design of carports do we want, If we do want them? Is thiS a carport design that we would
duplicate elsewhere on the Beach, CitY-Wide, or would be a stand-alone design solely for thiS
property? Currently, their design Includes posts at both ends of the parking spaces WIth a gable, tile
roof Do we want a cantilevered design With a Single post at the edge of the pavement (In front of
the spaces) (much like the carports over at the County bUilding Just a little away on S Ft
Hamson)? Design doesn't matter to me, whatever Tracey & Planning like
3 Related to #1 and #2, In light of recent Tropical Storms and Hurricanes that caused much
damage, espeCially to carport-type structures, and due to the fact that there IS nothing to buffet thiS
property from such storm Winds coming off the Gulf, to what standard do you build these carports,
knowmg that they are highly prone to Wind damage? Kevin Garnott would be able to address the
reqUired Wind load design
4 What weight, If any, would the Improvement of our property play Into the Planning Department's
recommendation to the CommunIty Development Board (COB) for the development proposal on
their adjacent property? The Improvement of our properly IS directly linked to the applicant's
development proposal on their adjacent property Is the City anticipating Improving our property
otherwise/regardless WIth such carports separately from thiS adjacent development proposal? We
had no plans to do anythmg to thiS property
10/5/2004
10/5/2004
Page 2 of3
5 Would we want any landscapIng Improvements also (In addItIon to the carports)? Code would
probably reqUire Improvements to landscaping and parking Paid for by the City or the adjacent
developer? There probably Isn't room for landscaping without losing parking spaces, which we
don't want to do We would not pay for landscapIng
Due to the proposed setbacks I have scaled on theIr drawing, the proposal for our properly would
need to be processed as a FleXible Development Comprehensive Inflll Redevelopment Project to
the COB (hence the need to sign an affidavit to authonze an agent) A survey of our property will be
reqUlfed to be submItted wIth any application for our properly If a survey IS required, thiS should be
undertaken & paid for by the adjacent developer Any Input, Information or help wIth thiS proposal
would be apprecIated
Wayne
m~-Oflglnal Message-nn
From: Bruch, Tracey
Sent: Monday, October 04, 20048 23 PM
To: RIchter, Debbie, Dowd, Larry, QUIllen, MIchael, Arasteh, Mahshld
Cc: Wells, Wayne; Rice, Scott
Subject: RE 15 Avalon (FLD2004-08059)
Deb.
Since thiS lot IS a parking system asset I would say the Engineering
Department / Parking System would be the approvIng party
Mike - your thoughts7 Have you seen any proposed deslgns7 I know we
talked about thIS several months ago and expressed our concerns but I have
yet to see anything further on It.
Tracey
--~- -On 9 I na I Messagenn-
From: Richter, DebbIe
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 11 56 AM
To: Dowd, Larry, Bruch, Tracey
Cc: Wells, Wayne
Subject: FW. 15 Avalon (FLD2004-08059)
Larry/Tracey Please see the e-mail below from Debra Butler With Northslde
Engmeermg regarding 0 Development Review Committee Item scheduled for
Thursday,lO/7 It's a new type of request to me so I'm startmg With you two
Wayne IS the Planner assigned to the proJect and will need to be mvolved H1 the
City'S response
-_mOnglnal Message---u
From: RIchter, DebbIe
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 11 47 AM
To: 'debra@northsldeengmeenng com'
Subject: RE 15 Avalon (FLD2004-08059)
Parks & Rec mamtOlns the landscapmg for the City lots (under Larry Dowd,
ASSistant Director) and the parkmg lots are managed by Tracey Bruch, Parkmg
-
Page30f3
Facilities Manager In our Public Works Admin/Engineering OffIce I believe both
will need to be Involved so I'll forward your e-mail to them
There wI! I a Iso be Impact fees Involved In this one, so let me know when you're
ready to discuss Thanks Debra
-----Onglnal Messagen---
From: Debra Butler [mallto.debra@northstdeengmeenng com]
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 11 22 AM
To: RIchter, DebbIe
Subject: 15 Avalon (FLD2004-08059)
Deborah,
In speaking wIth Wayne Wells today and after revIewing the Draft ORe comments It
has been brought to our attention that a second
Comp Inflll application WIll need to be submItted for the proposed carports on the CIty
owned parking lot adjacent to our project Our client has all along been proposing to
(at their own expense) erect carports on the City parking lot so that the condo unit
owners IIvmg In the new proposed AmbIance on White Sands Will not be lookIng down
onto the eXisting publiC parking lot and Instead Will look down onto some attractively
designed carports Wayne Isn't sure. who would from Within the CIty slgn the required
Letter of AuthOrizatIon that would accompany thiS second application AND who Within
the City would decIde on an acceptable design for these proposed carports on City
property Would you know who might be the person(s) we need to talk to? Would It
be someone from Parks and Rec since thiS IS publiC parking for "beach goers"?
Debra A Butler, Executive VIce Presldent/Planner
Northslde Engmeenng Services, Inc
601 Cleveland Street, SUite 930
Clearwater, Flonda 33755
(727) 443-2869 - phone
(727) 446-8036 - fax
10/512004
........
Page 1 of2
Wells, Wayne
From
Sent
To
Cc
Subject
Arasteh, Mahshld
Tuesday, October 05,2004208 PM
Bruch, Tracey, RIchter, Debbie, Dowd, Larry, QUillen, MIchael
Wells, Wayne, Rice, Scott, Tarapanl, Cyndl
RE 15 Avalon (FLD2004-08059)
This was discussed wIth Bill Horne today The directIon IS to separate the application for the condo Units from thiS
parking lot There will be a meeting for Parking, Englneenng and planning to review the treatments to the parking
lot At a minimum, the car ports need to be designed to a Cat III hUrricane standard and the agreement With the
city needs to Include a "hold harmless" clause for the City
Cyndl, pis comment
Thanks
Mahshld 0 Arasteh, P E
Public Works Administrator
727-562-4757
---nOng I na I M essagenn-
From: Bruch, Tracey
Sent: Monday, October 04, 20048 23 PM
To: Richter, DebbIe, Dowd, Larry; QUIllen, MIchael, Arasteh, Mahshld
Cc: Wells, Wayne, RIce, Scott
Subject: RE 15 Avalon (FLD2004-08059)
Deb.
Since thiS lot IS a parking system asset I would say the Engineering Department /
Parking System would be the approving party.
Mike - your thoughts7 Have you seen any proposed deslgns7 I know we talked about
thiS several months ago and expressed our concerns but I have yet to see anything
further on It
Tracey
nmOnglnal Messagenn-
From: Richter, DebbIe
Sent. Monday, October 04, 2004 11 S6 AM
To: Dowd, Larry, Bruch, Tracey
Cc: Wells, Wayne
Subject: fIN' 15 Avalon (FLD2004-08059)
Larry/Tracey Please see the e-mail below from Debra Butler With Northslde Engineering
regarding a Development ReView Committee Item scheduled for Thursday, 10/7 It's a new
type of request to me so I'm starting With you two Wayne IS the Planner assigned to the
project and will need to be Involved In the City's response
"
10/5/2004
:f.r-
10/5/2004
Page 2 of2
nmOnglnal Messagenm
From: RIchter, DebbIe
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 11.47 AM
To: 'debra@northsldeengmeenng com'
Subject: RE 15 Avalon (FLD2004-08059)
Parks & Rec mamtOlns the landscapmg for the City lots (under Larry Dowd, ASSistant
Director) and the parking lots are managed by Tracey Bruch, Parking facIlities Manager In our
Public Works Admin/Engineering Office I believe both will need to be Involved so I'll forward
your e-mail to them
There wi! I a Iso be I mpact fees Invo lved In this one, so let me know when you're ready to
diSCUSS Thanks Debra
un-angInal Messagenn-
From: Debra Butler [mallto debra@northsldeengtneenng.com]
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 11 22 AM
To: Richter, DebbIe
Subject: 15 Avalon (FLD2004-08059)
Deborah.
In speaking With Wayne Wells today and after reviewing the Draft DRC comments It has been
brought to our attentIon that a second
Comp Intill application Will need to be submItted for the proposed carports on the City owned parking
lot adjacent to our project Our client has all along been proposing to (at their own expense) erect
carports on the City parking lot so that the condo Unit owners liVing In the new proposed AmbIance
on White Sands WIll not be looking down onto the eXisting public parking lot and Instead Will look
down onto some attractively deSigned carports Wayne Isn't sure, who would from WIthin the City
sign the reqUired Letter of AuthOrizatIon that would accompany thiS second application AND who
Within the CIty would deCide on an acceptable deSIgn for these proposed carports on City properly
Would you know who might be the person(s) we need 10 talk to? Would It be someone from Parks
and Rec since thiS IS public parkIng for "beach goers"?
Debra A Butler, Executive Vice PreSident/Planner
Northslde Engmeenng Services, Inc
601 Cleveland Street, SUIte 930
Clearwater, Flonda 33755
(727) 443-2869 - phone
(727) 446-8036 - fax
.....~
Page 1 of3
Wells, Wayne
From QUillen, Michael
Sent Tuesday, October 05,20041002 AM
To Wells, Wayne, Bruch, Tracey
Cc Tarapanl, Cyndl, Gerlock, ChIp, RIce, Scott, Garnott, Kevin
Subject RE 15 Avalon (FLD2004-08059)
I have added my thoughts In red below Tracey- please add to them Scott has a copy of the latest submittal, but
If I remember nght It Just shows a schematiC
mnOflglnal Message-m-
From: Wells, Wayne
Sent: Tuesday, October OS, 20048 09 AM
To: Bruch, Tracey, Quillen, MIchael
Cc: Tarapanl, Cyndl, Gerlock, ChIp
Subject: RE 15 Avalon (FLD2004~080s9)
Tracey/Mike -
I have raIsed the question of what department IS responsible for the property to the applicant (thiS IS why
you are getting the emall request) Whatever department IS responsible, then that department head would
need to Sign the affIdaVIt to authOrize an agent on behalf of the owner (the City) to allow someone to
request to Improve our property As user department Englneenng would be responsible With me sIgning
The follOWing queslions are pertinent to the Issue
1 Does the City even want the proposed carports? That would be up to Tracey I guess we would accept
them subject to satisfactory responses to Tracey's earlier comments, particularly regarding long term
maintenance
2 What deSign of carports do we want, If we do want them? Is thiS a carport deSIgn that we would
duplicate elsewhere on the Beach, City-wide, or would be a stand-alone deSign solely for thiS property?
Currently, their deSign Includes posts at both ends of the parking spaces With a gable, tile roof Do we
want a cantIlevered deSign With a Single post at the edge of the pavement (In front of the spaces) (much
like the carports over at the County bUildIng Just a little away on S Ft Hamson)? DeSign doesn't matter to
me, whatever Tracey & Planning like
3 Related to #1 and #2, In light of recent Tropical Storms and HurrIcanes that caused much damage,
especIally to carport-type structures, and due to the fact that there IS nothing to buffet thiS property from
such storm Winds coming off the Gulf, to what standard do you build these carports, knOWing that they are
highly prone to Wind damage? KeVin Gamott would be able to address the required Wind load deSign
4 What weight, If any, would the Improvement of our property play Into the Planning Department's
recommendation to the Community Development Board (COB) for the development proposal on their
adjacent property? The Improvement of our property IS directly linked to the applicant's development
proposal on their adjacent property Is the City antIcipating Improving our property otherwise/regardless
With such carports separately from thiS adjacent development proposal? We had no plans to do anything
to thiS property
5 Would we want any landscaping Improvements also (In addition to the carports)? Code would probably
requIre Improvements to landscaping and parking Paid for by the City or the adjacent developer? There
probably Isn't room for landscaping WIthout lOSing parking spaces, which we don't want to do We would
not pay for landscaping
Due to the proposed setbacks I have scaled on their draWing, the proposal for our property would need to
be processed as a FleXible Development ComprehenSIve Inflll Redevelopment Project to the COB (hence
the need to sIgn an affidaVIt to authOrize an agent) A survey of our properly WIll be required to be
submitted With any appllcailon for our property If a survey IS reqUired, thiS should be undertaken & paid
for by the adjacent developer Any Input, Iflformailon or help WIth thiS proposal would be appreciated
101512004
""-
Page 2 of3
Wayne
muOnglnal Message_un
From: Bruch, Tracey
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 8 23 PM
To: Richter, DebbIe, Dowd, Larry, QUIllen, Michael, Arasteh, Mahshld
Cc: Wells, Wayne, RIce, Scott
Subject: RE 15 Avalon (FLD2004-08059)
Deb.
Since this lot IS a parking system asset I would say the Engineering Department /
Parking System would be the approving party.
MIke - your thoughts! Have you seen any proposed designs! I know we talked
about this several months ago and expressed our concerns but I have yet to see
anything further on It.
Tracey
--mOnglnal Messagemn
From: RIchter, DebbIe
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 11 56 AM
To: Dowd, Larry; Bruch, Tracey
Cc: Wells, Wayne
Subject: PN' 15 Avalon (FLD2004-08059)
Lorry/Tracey Please see the e-mail below from Debra Butler With Narthslde
Engineering regarding a Development Review Committee Item scheduled for Thursday,
10/7 It's 0 new type of request to me so I'm starting With you two Wayne IS the
Planner assigned to the project and will need to be Involved In the City's response
-----Onglnal Message-----
From: RIchter, Debbie
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 11 47 AM
To: 'debra@northsldeengmeenng com'
Subject: RE 15 Avalon (FLD2004-08059)
Parks & Rec maintains the landscaping for the City lots (under Lorry Dowd, ASSistant
Director) and the parking lots ore managed by Tracey Bruch, Parking Facilities Manager
In our Public Works Admin/Engineering Office I believe both will need to be Involved so
I'll forward your e-mail to them
There will also be Impact fees Involved In thiS one, so let me know when you're ready to
diSCUSS Thanks Debra
mnOnglnal Message--...
From. Debra Butler [mallto debra@northsldeenglneenng.com]
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 11 22 AM
To: Richter, DebbIe
Subject: 15 Avalon (FLD2004-080S9)
10/5/2004
. ","'
1 0/5/2004
Page 3 of3
Deborah,
In speaking with Wayne Wells today and after reviewing the Draft DRC comments It has been
brought to our attention that a second
Camp Infill applicatIon will need to be submitted for the proposed carports on the Clly owned
parking lot adjacent to our project Our client has all along been proposing to (at their own
expense) erect carports on the City parking lot so that the condo unit owners living In the new
proposed Ambiance on Whtte Sands Will not be looking down onto the eXisting public parking
lot and Instead wlillook down onto some attractively desIgned carports Wayne Isn't sure,
who would from within the City sIgn the requIred Letter of Authorization that would
accompany thIS second applicatIon AND who within the CIty would deCide on an acceptable
desIgn for these proposed carports on City property Would you know who might be the
person(s) we need to talk to? Would It be someone from Parks and Rec since thIS IS public
parking for "beach goers"?
Debra A Butler, Executive Vice PresldentlPlanner
Northslde Engmeenng SerVIces, Inc
601 Cleveland Street, SUI te 930
Clearwater, Flonda 33755
(727) 443~2869 - phone
(727) 446-8036 - fax
~
.
Page 1 of3
Wells, Wayne
From
Sent
To
Cc
Subject
Bruch, Tracey
Tuesday, October 05, 2004 1 53 PM
QUillen, Michael, Wells, Wayne
Tarapanl, Cyndl, Gerlock, ChIp, RIce, Scott, Garnott, Kevin
RE 15 Avalon (FLD2004-08059)
see my comments In Green below.
nn-Onglnal Message-nn
From: QUillen, MIchael
Sent: Tuesday, October OS, 2004 10 02 AM
To: Wells, Wayne, Bruch, Tracey
Cc: Tarapanl, Cyndl, Gerlock, ChIp, RIce, Scott, Garnott, KeVin
Subject. RE 15 Avalon (FLD2004-08059)
I have added my thoughts In red below Tracey- please add to them Scott has a copy of the latest
submittal, but If I remember nghtlt Just shows a schematIC
m--Onglnal Message---n
From: Wells, Wayne
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 20048 09 AM
To: Bruch, Tracey, QUillen, MIchael
Cc: Tarapanl, Cyndl, Gerlock, ChIp
Subject: RE 15 Avalon (FLD2004-08059)
Tracey/Mike -
I have raised the question of what department IS responsIble for the property to the applicant (th IS IS
why you are getting the emall request) Whatever department IS responsible, then that department
head would need to sign the affidavit to authorize an agent on behalf of the owner (the City) to allow
someone to request to Improve our properly As user department, Engineering would be
responsible wIth me signing The following questIons are pertInent to the Issue
1 Does the City even want the proposed carports? That would be up to Tracey I guess we would
accept Ihem subject 10 satisfactory responses to Tracey's earlier comments, particularly regarding
long term maintenance
[Tracey Bruch] After reviewing the archItectural rendering It IS my belIef that the
covered parkIng gIves the appearance the lot would be a private lot. Even
though It would remain metered and sIgned as public parking It appears as If It IS
private
We cannot afford to lose any parking and It appears as If we would based on the
placement of the columns.
The wall that IS shown along the east Side of the lot Will become a maintenance
issue. DUring frequent Wind storms, sand / debriS Will build up In these areas and
WIll not be able to be swept with the City's street sweeper (as they currently
are) but will have to be cleaned by hand. The CIty has high standards with
keeping the parking lots clean If It IS up to the CIty to take over thIS responsIbIlIty
It Will dramatIcally Increase our maIntenance costs. If It IS up to the condo assoc.
how much of a priOrity WIll it be?
10/5/2004
] 0/5/2004
Page 2 of3
Liability IS another Issue not Just for property damage but personalllablJlty (I e ,
assaults, personal attacks, etc due to the loss of an open air atmosphere)
It would be my recommendation not to approve the covered parking.
2 What desIgn of carports do we want, If we do want them? Is this a carport design that we would
duplicate elsewhere on the Beach, City-wIde, or would be a stand-alone desIgn solely for thIs
property? Currently, their design Includes posts at both ends of the parking spaces with a gable, tile
roof Do we want a cantilevered deSign with a SIngle post at the edge of the pavement (In front of
the spaces) (much like the carports over at the County bUilding just a little away on S Ft
Harrison)? DeSign doesn't matter to me, whatever Tracey & Planning like
3 Re'ated to #1 and #2, In light of recent Tropical Storms and HUrricanes that caused much
damage, especIally to carport-type structures, and due to the fact that there IS nothing to buffet thiS
property from such storm winds coming off the Gulf, to what standard do you build these carports,
knOWing that they are highly prone to wind damage? KeVin Garriott would be able to address the
required wInd load deSIgn
4 What weight. If any, would the Improvement of our property play Into the PlannIng Department's
recommendation to the Community Development Board (COB) for the development proposal on
their adjacent property? The Improvement of our property IS directly linked to the applicant's
development proposal on their adjacent property Is the City anticipating Improving our property
otherwise/regardless With such carports separately from thiS adjacent development proposal? We
had no plans to do anythmg to thiS property
5 Would we want any landscaping Improvements also (In addition to the carports)? Code would
probably reqUire Improvements to landscaping and parking Paid for by the City or the adjacent
developer? There probably Isn't room for landscaping Without lOSing parking spaces, which we
don't want to do We would not pay for landscaping
.
Due to the proposed setbacks I have scaled on theIr draWing, the proposal for our property would
need to be processed as a FleXIble Development ComprehensIve Inflll Redevelopment Project to
the CDS (hence the need to Sign an affidaVit to authOrize an agent) A survey of our property WIll be
reqUIred to be submitted With any application for our property If a survey IS reqUIred, thIS should be
undertaken & paId for by the adjacent developer Any Input, InformatIOn or help WIth thiS proposal
would be apprecIated
Wayne
---nOnglnal Messagenm
From: Bruch, Tracey
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 8 23 PM
To: RIchter, Debbie, Dowd, Larry, QUIllen, MIChael, Arasteh, Mahshld
CC: Wells, Wayne, RIce, Scott
Subject: RE 15 Avalon (FLD2004-08059)
Deb,
Since thiS lot IS a parking system asset I would say the Englneenng
Department / Parking System would be the approving party.
Mike - your thoughts? Have you seen any proposed deSigns? I know we
talked about thiS several months ago and expressed our concerns but I have
yet to see anything further on It
Tracey
mnOnglnal Messagenm
From: RIchter, DebbIe
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 11 56 AM
. r .... to
Page 3 of3
To: Dowd, Larry, Bruch, Tracey
Cc: Wells, Wayne
Subject: FW 15 Avalon (FLD2004-08059)
Larry/Tracey Please see the e-mail below from Debra Butler With Northslde
Engineering regarding a Development Review Committee Item scheduled for
Thursday,lO/7 It's a new type of request to me so I'm starting With you two
Wayne IS the Planner assigned to the project and will need to be Involved In the
City's response
_nnOnglnal Message-nn
From: RIchter, Debbie
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 11 47 AM
To: 'debra@northsldeengmeermg com'
Subject: RE 15 Avalon (FlD2004-08059)
Parks & Rec maintainS the landscaping for the City lots (under Larry Dowd.
Assistant Director) and the parking lots are managed by Tracey Bruch, Parking
Facilities Manager In our PubliC Works Admin/Engineering Office I believe both
will need to be Involved so I'll forward your e-mail to them
There will also be Impact fees Involved In thiS one, so let me know when you're
ready to diSCUSS Thanks Debra
mnOnglnal Messagemn
From: Debra Butler [ma lito' debra@northsldeenglneenng com]
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 11 22 AM
To: RIchter, DebbIe
Subject: 15 Avalon (FLD2004-08059)
Deborah,
In speaking WIth Wayne Wells today and after revIewIng the Draft DRC comments it
has been brought to our attention that a second
Comp Intill application WIll need to be submItted for the proposed carports on the City
owned parking lot adjacent to our project Our dent has all along been proposIng to
(at their own expense) erect carports on the CIty parking 101 so that the condo unit
owners liVing In the new proposed Ambiance on White Sands Will not be looking down
onto the eXisting public parking lot and Instead Will look down onto some attractively
deSigned carports Wayne Isn't sure, who would from WithIn the City sign the required
Letter of AuthOrization that would accompany thiS second applicatIon AND who Within
the CIty would decide on an acceptable deSign for these proposed carports on City
property Would you know who might be the person(s) we need to talk to? Would It
be someone from Parks and Rec since thIS IS publiC parking for "beach goers"?
Debra A Butler, Executive VIce PreSident/Planner
Norths]de Engmeenng Services, Inc
601 Cleveland Street, SUite 930
Clearwater, Flonda 33755
(727) 443-2869 - phone
(727) 446-8036 - fax
10/5/2004
.
't
Page 1 of 2
Wells, Wayne
From Dowd, Larry
Sent Tuesday, October 05,2004948 AM
To Richter, Debbie, Bruch, Tracey
Cc Wells, Wayne, Dunbar, Kevin E , Kader, Art, Murphree, Brian
Subject RE 15 Avalon (FLD2004-08059)
Debbie - Sounds like this IS defInitely Tracey's I'll copy Bnan, as he contracts the grounds maintenance there,
so that Tracey can keep us all updated of any future work or changes to that property thanks
---uOnglnal Messageum
From: Richter, DebbIe
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 11 56 AM
To: Dowd, Larry, Bruch, Tracey
Cc: Wells, Wayne
Subject: FW 15 Avalon (FLD2004-08059)
Lorry/Tracey Please see the e-mail below from Debra Butler with Northslde Engineering regarding
a Development ReView Committee Item scheduled for Thursday, 10/7 It's a new type of request to
me so I'm starting with you two Wayne IS the Planner assigned to the proJect and will need to be
Involved In the City's response
-----Onglnal Messageum
From: Richter, DebbIe
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 11 47 AM
To: 'debra@northsldeenglneenng com'
Subject: RE 15 Avalon (FLD2004-08059)
Parks & Rec maintains the landscaping for the City lots (under Larry Dowd, ASSistant Director) and
the parking lots are managed by Tracey Bruch, Parking Facilities Manager m our Public Works
Admln/Englneermg Office I believe both will need to be Involved so I'll forward your e-mail to
them
There will olso be Impact fees Involved In thiS one, so let me know when you're ready to diSCUSS
Thanks Debra
-----Onglnal Messagemn
From: Debra Butler [mallto debra@northsldeenglneenng com]
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 11 22 AM
To: Richter, Debbie
Subject: 15 Avalon (FLD2004-08059)
Deborah,
In speaking WIth Wayne Wells today and after reviewIng the Draft DRC comments It has been brought to
our attention that a second
Camp Infill application WIll need to be submItted for the proposed carports on the City owned parking lot
adjacent to our project Our client has all along been proposing to (at their own expense) erect carports on
the City parking 101 so Ihat the condo unit owners liVing In the new proposed Ambiance on White Sands will
not be looking down onto the eXIstIng public parking lot and Instead will look down onto some attractively
deSigned carports Wayne Isn't sure, who would from WIthin the City sign the reqUired Letter of
10/5/2004
Page 2 of2
'10
AuthorizatIon that would accompany this second application AND who wIthin the City would decIde on an
acceptable desIgn for these proposed carports on City property Would you know who mIght be the person
(s) we need 10 talk to? Would It be someone from Parks and Rec since this IS public parkIng for "beach
goers"?
Debra A Butler, Executive VIce PresldentlPlanner
Norths]de Engmeermg ServIces, Inc
601 Cleveland Street, SUIte 930
Clearwater, Flonda 33755
(727) 443-2869 - phone
(727) 446-8036 - fax
10/5/2004
(
/"
..
Page 1 of2
Wells, Wayne
From
Sent
To
Cc
Subject
Richter, Debbie
Monday, October 04,2004 11 56 AM
Dowd, Larry, Bruch, Tracey
Wells, Wayne
FW 15 Avalon (FLD2004-08059)
Larry/Tracey Please see the e-mail below from Debra Butler with Northslde Engineering regarding
o Development Review Committee Item scheduled for Thursday, 10/7 It's a new type of request to me so
I'm starting with you two Wayne IS the Planner assigned to the proJect and wi! I need to be Involved In the
City's response
nn -On 9 I na I M essage---n
From: Richter, Debbie
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 11 47 AM
To: 'debra@northsldeengtneenng com'
Subject: RE. 15 Avalon (FLD2004-0B059)
Parks & Rec maintainS the landscaping for the City lots (under Larry Dowd, ASSistant Director) and the
parking lots ore managed by Tracey Bruch, Parking Facilities Manager In our Public Works
Admln/Engmeermg Office I believe both will need to be mvolved so I'll forward your e-mail to them
There will also be Impact fees mvolved m thiS one, so let me know when you're ready to diSCUSS Thanks
Debra
---nOng Ina I Messagen---
From: Debra Butler [mallto debra@northsldeengtneenng com]
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 11 22 AM
To' Richter, DebbIe
Subject: 15 Avalon (FLD2004-0B059)
Deborah,
In speaking with Wayne Wells today and after reviewing the Draft DRC comments It has been brought to our
attention that a second
Comp Infill application will need to be submitted for the proposed carports on the City owned parkIng lot adjacent
to our project Our client has all along been proposIng to (at th8lf own expense) erect carports on the City parklflg
lot so that the condo Unit owners livmg In the new proposed AmbIance on White Sands WIll not be looking down
onto the eXIsting publiC parking lot and Instead WIll look down onto some attractIvely deSigned carports Wayne
Isn't sure, who would from Within the City Sign the reqUired Letter of Authortzatlon that would accompany thIS
second application AND who WIthIn the CIty would deCide on an acceptable deSign for these proposed carports
on CIty property Would you know who might be the person(s) we need to talk to? Would It be someone from
Parks and Rec Since thiS IS public parkmg for "beach goers"?
Debra A Butler, Executive VIce PreSident/Planner
Northslde Engmeermg ServIces, Inc
601 Cleveland Street, SUlte 930
Clearwater, Flonda 33755
(727) 443-2869 - phone
(727) 446-8036 - fax
10/5/2004
'"
1'.. '
Page I of3
Wells, Wayne
From
Sent
To
Cc
Subject
Wells, Wayne
Tuesday, October 05,2004 B 09 AM
Bruch, Tracey, QUillen, Michael
Tarapanl, Cyndl, Gerlock, ChIp
RE 15 Avalon (FLD2004-0B059)
Tracey/Mike -
I have raised the question of what department IS responsible for the property to the applicant (thIs IS why you are
getting the emall request) Whatever department IS responsIble, then that department head would need to sign
the affIdavIt to authorize an agent on behalf of the owner (the City) to allow someone to request to Improve our
property The following questions are pertinent to the Issue
1 Does the City even want the proposed carports?
2 What design of carports do we want, If we do want them? Is thiS a carport desIgn that we would duplicate
elsewhere on the Beach, City-wide, or would be a stand-alone design solely for thiS property? Currently, theIr
design Includes posts at both ends of the parking spaces with a gable, tIle roof Do we want a cantilevered design
wIth a s Ingl e post at the edge of th e pavement (In front of the spaces) (mu ch II ke th e ca rports over at the Co u nty
bUilding Just a little away on S Ft Hamson)?
3 Related to #1 and #2, In light of recent Tropical Storms and HUrricanes that caused much damage, especially
to carport-type structures, and due to the fact that there IS nothing to buffet thiS property from such storm Winds
coming off the Gulf, to what standard do you bUIld these carports, knowing that they are highly prone to wInd
damage?
4 What weight, If any, would the Improvement of our property play Into the Planning Department's
recommendation to the Community Development Board (COB) for the development proposal on theIr adjacent
property? The Improvement of our property IS directly linked to the applicant's development proposal on their
adjacent property Is the City anticipating Improving our property otherwise/regardless With such carports
separately from thiS adjacent development proposal?
5 Would we want any landscaping Improvements also (In additIon to the carports)? Code would probably reqUIre
Improvements to landscaping and parking Paid for by the CIty or the adjacent developer?
Due to the proposed setbacks I have scaled on th8lr drawing, the proposal for our property would need \0 be
processed as a FleXible Development Comprehensive Inflll Redevelopment Project to the COB (hence the need
\0 sign an affidaVIt to authOrize an agent) A survey of our property Will be required to be submitted WIth any
application for our properly Any Input, Information or help With thIS proposal would be appreciated
Wayne
-----Ong I na I Message-----
From: Bruch, Tracey
Sent: Monday, October 04, 20048 23 PM
To: RIchter, DebbIe, Dowd, Larry, QUillen, MIchael, Arasteh, Mahshld
Cc: Wells, Wayne, RIce, Scott
Subject: RE 15 Avalon (FLD2004-08059)
Deb'
Since thIS lot IS a parking system asset I would say the Engineering Department /
Parking System would be the approving party.
Mike - your thoughts? Have you seen any proposed designs? I know we talked about
thiS several months ago and expressed our concerns but I have yet to see anythIng
10/5/2004
. .
I~.
Page 2 of3
further on It
Tracey
-----angInal Message-nn
From: RIchter, DebbIe
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 11 '56 AM
To: Dowd, Larry, Bruch, Tracey
Cc: Wells, Wayne
Subject: FW 15 Avalon (FlD2004-08059)
Larry/Tracey Please see the e-mail below from Debra Butler with Northslde Engineering
regarding a Development ReView Committee Item scheduled for Thursday, 10/7 It's a new
type of request to me so I'm starting with you two Wayne IS the Planner assigned to the
proJect and will need to be Involved In the City's response
-----Onglnal Messagenm
From: RIchter, DebbIe
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 11.47 AM
To: 'debra@northsldeenglneenng com'
Subject: RE 15 Avalon (FLD2004-08059)
Parks & Rec maintains the landscaping for the City lots (under Larry bawd, ASSistant
Director) and the parking lots are managed by Tracey Bruch, Parking Facilities Manager In our
Public Works Admm/Englneerlng Office I believe both Will need to be Involved so I'll forward
your e-mail to them
There will also be Impact fees Involved In thiS one, so let me know when you're ready to
diSCUSS Thanks Debra
-----angInal Messagenm
From: Debra Butler [mallto debra@northsldeenglneenng,com]
Sent: Monday, October 04,200411 22 AM
To: RIchter, DebbIe
Subject: 15 Avalon (FlD2004-08059)
Deborah,
In speaking wIth Wayne Wells today and after revIewing the Draft ORC comments It has been
brought to our attention that a second
Comp Intill application WIll need to be submitted for the proposed carports on the CIty owned parking
lot adjacent to our project Our client has all along been proposIng to (at their own expense) erect
carports on the City parking lot so that the condo unit owners liVIng In the new proposed Ambiance
on White Sands Will not be lookIng down onto the eXIstIng publiC parking lot and Instead Will look
down onto some allractlvely deSIgned carports Wayne Isn't sure, who would from Within the Clty
sign the required Letter of AuthorIzatIon that would accompany thiS second applicallon AND who
Within the City would deCide on an acceptable deSIgn for these proposed carports on City property
Would you know who might be the person(s) we need to talk to? Would It be someone from Parks
and Rec sInce thIS IS publiC parking for "beach goers"?
Debra A Butler, Executive Vice PreSident/Planner
Northslde Engmeenng ServIces, Inc
601 Cleveldlld Street, SUlte 930
Clearwater, Flonda 33755
10/5/2004
;;:
Wells, Wayne
From
Sent
To
Cc
Subject
Wells, Wayne
Saturday, October 02, 2004729 AM
Tarapam, Cyndl
Gerlock, Chip
Heads Up #2 for 10 7 04 ORC
Cyndl -
Just want you to know that I am finding It suffIcIent to go forward to the COB, but will not be supporting the request, for the
project at 15-17 Avalon Street and 16 Kendall Street (FL02004-08059/TDR2004-08008) ThIs IS the project nexl to the
City parkIng lot on the beach that we had a meeting with Bill Horne, et al about Planning comment #19 (see attached) IS
the big one, where the project IS Just too much, too tall with too little setback to property lines Draft ORC comments have
been sent out
Wayne
~
draft 10 7 04 drc
action agend
Case Number FLD2004-08u:J9 -- 15 A V ALON ST
Lamer Beach Club Llc
200 Bnghtwatcr DI # 7
Clealwater, FI33767
TELEPHONE No Phone, FAX No Fax, E-MAIL No Emall
Allan J Crooker
16 Kendall Street
Clearwater, FI 33767-1624
TELEPHONE No Phone, FAX No Fax, E-MAIL No Emall
Mcsmnh Inc
2440 Roberta Lane
Clearwatel, Fl 33764-6585
TELEPHONE No Phone, FAX No Fax, E-MAIL No Emad
Aqua Sun Development, Llc
211 S MYTlle Avenue
Clearwater, FI 33756
TELEPHONE 727-480-3775, FAX 727-595-3413, E-MAIL No Emad
RepreSenlJtlve, Housh Ghovaee
601 Cleveland Street
Clearwatel, FI33755
TELEPHONE 727-443-2869, FAX 727-446-8036, E-MAIL nestech@nundspnng com
LocatIOn 0299 acres located between Avalon Street and Kendall Street, approxImately 200 feet west of Mandalay
A venue
Atlas I"age 258A
Zonmg District MHDR, MedIum HIgh DensIty ReSldentlal
Request (1) Termmal10n of Statu~ of Nonconformity for density (15 overnIght accommodation unns - to be
converted to II dwe 11 mg units), und er the prov ISlOns of SectIOn 6-109, (2) F I ex lb Ie Deve lopmen t approval
to permit a IOta 1 of 13 attached dwelhngs m the MedIUm High DensIty ReSidential (MHDR) DIstrict and
TourISt (T) Dlstncl With reductIOns to lot area It1the MHDR Dlstnct from ]5,000 square feet to 8,700
square feet and III the T Dlstnct from 10 000 square feet to 4,350 square feet, reductions to lot Width III the
MHO R DIStrl ct from 150 feel 10 100 feet and I n the T Dlstnct from ] 00 feet to 50 feet, red uct Ions to the
front (north along Avalon Street - MHDR Dlstnct) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet (to buildmg) and from 25
feet to zero feet (to dumpster stagmg pad), a reductIOn to the Side (east - MHDR District) from 10 feet to
9 7 feet (to bu lid mg) a 1 eduction to the s Ide (west - M H DR D lstn ct) from 10 feet to zero feet (to bu lid mg),
a reductlQn to the rear (south - MHDR District) from 15 feet to 9 8 feet (to bUlldll1g), a reduction to the
tront (south along Kendall Street - T DIstrict) trom 15 feet to 10 teet (to bUlldll1g), a reductIOn to the Side
(eaST - T Dlstnct) from 10 feet to 9 8 feet (to bUI]dlng), a reductIOn to the SIde (west - T Dlstnct) from 10
feet to zero feet (to budding), an ll1crease to bulldmg height 111 the MI-lDR Dlstnct from 30 feet and In the r
DlstTlct from 35 feet to 69 5 feet (to roof deck) With perimeter parapets of 3 67 feet (from roof deck) and
decorative roof structures of 10 1 feet (II om roof deck) and to permit a bU1ldlllg Wlthlll the VISibilIty
tnangles as a ReSIdentm] lnfill Project III the MHDR District and as a ComprehenSive Infill Redevelopment
Project m the T DIStrict, undel the provIsions of Sections 2-404 F dnd 2-803 C, (3) A reduction 10 the front
perimeter butler along A valon Street m the M H DR District from 10 feet to zero feel (to dumpster stagmg
pad), a reduction to the SIde (east) landscape buffel m the MI-lDR District from ]0 feet to 97 feet (to
buildmg), a reductlon to the SIde (west) landscape buffer In the MHDR DIstnct from 10 feet to zero feet (to
buildmg), and a reductIon to the rear (south) landscape buffer In the MI-lDR District from 10 feel 10 9 8 feel
(to bu I ldmg), as aCorn prehensl ve Landscape P lan, under the prov ISlOns of SectIOn 3 -12 02 G, and (4) th e
Transfer of Development Rights (rDR2004-08008) of one dwellmg unllto thiS slle fi om 321 Coronado
Drive, under the prOVISions of Section 4-1402
Propused Use Attached dwelllllgs
Neighborhood Clearwater Beach ASSOClallOn
Assocl3tlOu(s) Clcanvater, r I 33767
827 Mandalay Ave
TELEPHONE 727-446-5801, FAX No fax, E-MAIL dmacnav@att net
Neighborhood Clearwater NeIghborhoods CoahtlOn
As~ollatlOn(s), Clearwater, F] 33761
2544 Fnsco Dnve
TELEPHONE 727-725-3345, FAX No Fax, E-MAIL DJw@gte net
Presenter' Wayne Wells, Planner]1I
1 :45 pm
Owner(s)'
Owncr(s).
Owner(s)'
Applicant
:D I'A. ft
10.'- e~
t'flt
~~~
Development ReView Agenda - Thursday, October 7,2004 - Page 26
Attendees Included CIty Statf Chip Gerlock, Wayne Wells, Scoll Rice, Joe Colbert
Applicant/representative Housh Ghovaee, Debra Butler, Doreen Will1ams, John Marshall Scott, AllJama Abhyankar,
Peter Govetoso, Kalpesh Patel, Somel Abhyankar, Rich Kelley
The ORe revlCwed this applicatIOn with the followmg comments
G ener al E ngmeefl ng:
I I) The nlllumum samtary sewer service IS 6" not 4" as shown
2) The proposed fire hydrants to be a minimum of 15 ft from any stmcture
3) The fire department connectlOn to be a mll1m1U of 15 ft from any structure
4) Proposed domestic water meter to be field located Meter cannot be placed wlthlll any
concrete
5) No bUlldmg projectIOns shall be constructed wlthlll air space of the adjacent property on the
west
6) Need to label area east oframp wllhlll the stmcture
7) A 4 ft Sidewalk Will be reqUIred wlthmthe nght-of-way of Kendall Street and Avalon Street
All of tile above to be addressed pnor to COB
Pnor to C 0
1) F ma I condoffimum pia t to be recorded
EnVironmental.
PlIor to bUlldmg pemut, Sea-turtle fnendly light fixtures deSign to be subrrutted to the
Envllonmental DIVISIon, please refer to Sectlon 3-1302 subsectIOns C and 0
Fire
Show FOC at least 15 feet from the bUlldlllg and wlthm 40 feet ofa Fire Hydrant dedicated to
the Fue Sprmkler System Pnor to COB
2 Where underground water mams and hydrants are to be Illstalled, they shall be lllstalled,
completed, and m service pnor to constructIOn as per NFP A 241 Please acknowledge PRIOR
TO COB
3 The City Parkmg Lot must remam with at least a 24 foot dn ve Width up to a he 19ht of at least 14
feet between any roof rilles The roofs must not mterfere WIth the turn radms 01 emergency
vehicles
4 ThiS ORC ReView by Fire IS not an approval or levlew of any constructIOn plans or documents
Olher than SIle work PLEASE ACKNOWLEDGE
Harbor Master.
] No Issues
Legal.
I No Issues
L.and Resources
] No Issues
La ndsc aping'
I There IS an extensIVe area In front of the entry to the north Side which could have addItIonal
landscape matenals mstalled III It
2 Per SectlOn 3-1204 0 alllandscapmg mus] be protected from vehicular and pedestnan tra flic
by the mstallatlOn of curbmg and wheel stops, or other protective deVices along the penmeter of
any landscapmg which adJoms vehicular use areas and sldewalks These protective deVices
shall have a nummum height of SIX mches above grade
3 Plan doe~ /lot meellhe reqUIrements ofpenmeter plantmgs m Code SectIOn 3-1202 D
rhere IS a large portIOn of bUlldmg m the reqUlred buffer area to the west of the bUlldmg 1Il the
MHDR zonmg district ReVise plan to mstall thiS buffer area
Parks and Recreation'
ClanficatlOn IS needed on the # ofresldenlIal unt ts eXlstmg (10 or 15) and proposed (II or 13)
Open Space and RecreatIOn Impact Fees are due pnor to Issuance ofbUlldmg perrruts or final
plat (If apphcable) whIchever occurs first '{ hese fees could be substantIal and It IS
recommended that you contact Deb Richter at 727-562-4817 to calculate the assessment
StOt mwater'
Pnor to Issuance of a bUlldmg perrru t the retentIOn IS to be enlarged to accomodate a 50 yr
deSign storm wllh 1/2 foot of freeboard Engmeer IS to proVide a SOlI percolation test to show
that pond will dlJlll down III 24 hours
Sohd W <iste.
I Please show where Recychng contalllers Will be placed
Development ReView Agenda - Thursday, October 7,2004 - Page 27
Tratfic Engmeenng.
1 1 StrategIcally locate dIsabled parkmg space to nearest accessIble entrance to comply wIth
Chapter 11 Flonda Buldmg Code for BUlldmg ConstructIOn SectIOn] 1-4 6 2
2 Parallel parkmg spaces must comply with CIty ~Iandards 8' feet x 23' feet These spaces are
along an melme. demonstrate how they may be used safely and the method of egress
3 Covered parkmg space must not have colunms /posts mtrudmg m 9 feet' x 19' feet parkmg
stalls No Sp3GeS may be lost due to structure
4 "[ he letter states" sound sepal a tlOn from the park mg lot "Will there be a wall or fence
alung the east Side 01 the parkmg lot and how Will that affect the parkmg meters?
5 How Wll! the eXlstmg lIghtmg at the parkll1g Jot be affected (turtle fnendly lights)?
6 Who 15 responsible for mamtenance/damage/vandalism of the structure at the parkmg lot?
7 The letter mentIOns landscapmg the north halfofthe lot Dependmg oflhe level of
landscapmg, who WI!! be responsible for the routme mamtenece costs
8 Will the cleaJance m the parkmg lot be suffiCIent to allow the City street sweepers access'l
9 The sight tnangles on the north dn veway are drawn Il1correctly It appears that portlOns of the
structures wIl] encroach mto the slghllnangles, demonstrate that the dnveways can operate
safely Ofpartlcu]ar concern IS the south dnveway and the traffic from the public parkmg lot
10 Measures (Slgnage) must be proVided to IdentIfY the parkmg lot as pubhc
11 All of the above to be addresed pnor to CDn
Pl,mnlng
Development ReView Agenda - Thursday, October 7. 2004 - Page 28
1 Re\lse the engmeenng bar scale left of the zero mark to change from "40" to "20" feel
2 RevIse the applrtatlon and the Letter of AuthonzatlOn to mdlCate the property owner of 15
Avalon IS Lamer Beach Club LLC (200 Bnghtwater Dnve, #7, Clearwater, FL 33767-2452),
accordmg to the Pmellas County Property Appraiser with a sale date m March 2004 with a
recorded deed (not B & R Beach Holdmgs, LLC)
3 Provide public sIdewalk along Avalon Street frontage
4 Proposalmcludes constructmg carports over eXlstmg parkmg spaces III City-owned parklllg lot to
west of subject sIte CIty property is zoned Open Space and RecreatIOn (OSR) Dlstnct Use of
the City property IS "parkmg garage and lots" Proposed carports do not meet front (north along
A valon Street and south along Kendall Street) setback of 25 feet, or 10-foot SIde setback A~
such, to construct such Improvements on the City-owned property Will reqllire the fihng ofa
ComprehensiVe lnfill Redevelopment Project applicatIOn, which WIll also need to mclude
deV13tlOns to belllg adjacent to resldenually-zoned property and to Improvlllg the frontages along
A valon and Kenda II Streets to be sumlar 10 character to uses and structure~ frontlllg on each
street for a distance of 250 feet It IS also unclear at thiS pomt III time that the CIty IS wIlllllg to
accept such Improvements to ItS propel ty and what fonn (design) of such Improvements would be
acceptable
5 ReVise VISibility tnangles on Kendall Street on Sheet L 1 1 (measured along front property hne,
nOI the roadway eUl b)
6 Sheet CJ 1 - "apprmdmately 38 spate~" are llldlCatcd on the Clt)l-owned parking lot to the west,
yet only 3S spaces are shown Venfy number and show accurately
7 Show locatlOll of II1tenor landscape areas Closshatched 01 ~haded
8 DmlenSlQn depth of cantilevered balcollles flOm face of the bUlldmg
9 Identify on Sheets A4 and A5 the proposed colors of the bUlldmg and architectural elements
10 ReVise "DescnptlOn of Requests" 111 Exhibit A to that mdlcated by staff, Includmg the
]uslIficatlon tor each reductIon or lllcrease lequested III all appropnate cntena
11 Address eXlstmg and proposed slgnage
12 ReVise "DeStnptlOn of Request" III ExhIbit A to Include the eXlstlllg tive umt overnight
accommodatIOns at 15 Avalon Street to be demohshed III the first sentence
13 ReVise narratIve under #3 of "Wntten Subrruttal ReqUirements" VlSIblhty tnangles are not bemg
observed a.'. the proposed bUlldll1g Intrudes Il1to the VISibIlity tnangles on A valon and Kendall
Su eets
14 Address the Clllena of SectIOn 6-109 C for T ernuna tlon of S tdtUS of N onconfonm ty Il1 rei a tlon to
thIS proposal
15 Transfer of Development Rights - It is mdlcated that the sendll1g property I.'. developed With a
conmlerclal bUlldmg that presently does not have any tenants The slte ]S not vacant Apphcant
must calcula te the nllxed-use (,a lculatIon of names ldentIal and reSidentIal to determme If there
are any dwellmg umts available on t\m sendmg parcel to be transferred to the subject property
16 Transfer of Development Rights - PrOvIde the full address for the owner of the sender site
17 Transfer of Development RIghts - It IS Il1dlcated that Roland Rogel s IS the owner of the sender
Site, however, the deed subnutted IS neither Signed nor rec-orded SubmIt lecorded deed or revIse
appltcatlOn 10 tunelll ownel wllh applOpllate documentatlOn for sender
18 Transfel of Dcvclopment RIghts - Complete the apphcatlon under "Retelver ~lte" for the "cunenl
use of the property" to llldlCate 15 overnIght accommodatlon UllltS + one dwellmg Ulllt
19 Setback reduttlOns are Slgmficant, espeCially on the west Side where a zero setback IS requested
In addl tlon, the size of the parcel and lot Width reductlOn reques ts are less than the standards set
forth Il1 the Zonll1g DistrIcts Contnbutmg factors to these concerns may Il1clude, but may not be
limIted to, the size of the UllltS proposed (VllltS A & B greater than 3,000 square feet, UllltS C
over 2 300 square feet), the request to Termmate the Status of Nonconfonruty for 15 overnIght
aceommoda tlOn umts to be converted to 11 dwellmg UllltS (otherwise at 30 duJacre would
produce only eIght pemutted dwelling umts) and the transfer of development nghts of one umt
-I he Old Flonda Dlstnct hnuts height to "low to nud-nse" BUlldll1g height IS proposed at 69 5
feet fl om BFE to roof deck To date, the talle.'.! structure proposed or approved wlthm thIS
DIStllCt IS 69 5 feet from BFE to the roof deck (La Rlsa, 650 Bay E~planade), which had varYll1g
loaf deck bUlldmg heights, With 69 5 belllg the tallest roof height (57% of totdl roof .Ired) Other
roof heights were 585 feet, 48 feet and 37 5 feet above BFE) The project at 14 Somerset was
approved at S6 feet 111 height The proJcct at 15 Somerset was approved at 61 66 feet III height
PotentIally too many Ul1lts .Ire bemg proposed or a different deSign would be more acceptable
S ta ff Will not support the proposed heIght and proposed setbacks
20 Plovlde on Sheet A I the umt sIzes for U nits A, nand C
Development ReVIew Agenda - Thursday, OClobel 7, 2004 - Page 29
2 I ProvIde narrative documenting that this proposed bUilding wIll also meet BUlldmg Code
reqUirements for the square footage of opemngs allowed on each sIde based on the setbacks
proposed
Other.
No Conunents
Nules To be placed on the 11/16/04 COB agenda, submIt 15 collated caples of the revised plans & applicatIOn matenal addressmg all
abovt departments' wmments by noon, 10/14/04 Packets shall be collated, folded and stapled as appropnate
Development ReView Agenda - Thursday, October 7, 2004 - Page 30
I"
o
z
=E
::r:
~
tT'l
en
>-
Z
o
en
,
'L lL.2LJ~-:--'...J'"
I .,;!!!I J.=".~.~.~
, h-.............
-~ '1 " "i'l'~
~.. ., -. ~ -, -~
.~I,,;'I..il~11~1'. ~~
= ~ = ~ = =
~ ~ ~ 9 ~ ~
~"C",j"'d.dfj"'j
E:-:: ....;.. .... -1 .... ~. ... ~ 1 ...:.1
~"~"~"~"'~"'d
:-
>~
=
..~
n~
"'0;
-?=
...;:::::
r-
rn C/>
r-)
:3
-= ~
~ ==
3. :=
~= 3
- ~
ii1! i!i
a -
~ ! ~
;~. 1. 1. :;.~11.~
~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~
0-1-1-1-1-13 ~
~ .d d ;:::3 :::=:! ==
S! - == S :3 =
~ = ~ = = =
~ = ~ N ~ ~
~.;,.~,.~.~.~
._~~ :~ .:q :.~-:g ~
~~ - - - - -
G - ~ ~ ~-. = ~
...======
=_ =1= ~ :;;;;;;; a
Jl;.... :....;~~~~~~~
&1
r
m
<
m
r
.....
~
(Jl ""U (Jl
n l:> -u
:> :>
r ::0 n
m m
2S (Jl
Ii Z -I
'" I
Q G> (ij
"il -. r
en I;J2
=i m
r
m
""U
~
Z
z
"'
'^
, "
" 0
",000
:/' Ov'-
<>~"""?/og..^
'^
'&
.....9-0) ~ )
^!:>.;..(
en
--.J
0;.- ~ )"
,10'-0"---
-'
r"'::~ - - - - n_--------:
I ..........:: <......--- !
I - - I
____________ I
I':< J:\ .... ~ S S 5
---}------t--
KENDALL 8T
40-0"
, ,
,
"
, ~^
.
~
t
'='o.3":l ~
1O'-D" 0_
~ ~ S) ) )
) S ~ ~
~ () )
-~-~~-~~----
,
: :><
L ,,:.:'~ _ n n____~_~
;0
:>
:;::
'& "
'& * -< .
1'/ 0
o- r I
I;J2
0-- m
"';'330--0 r
'"
,"
," ( l?))
24.1114
:'
"
,",,"'';''OO):;'-(S
'"
6 ,:;~- ,;;;
;.0;,..... (
~~t\::.:.(\ .......0
9'-0'
TV.
i~
<>
<::t>
J>
U'l
co
w
<;;
'"
co
d,
) (( () (0", ~"
<; ,
~ ,'i- ';~
'"Z %;:'v
AVAON 8T
g()'-IJ
...
~
q
.
- -
- -
- -
m
I C PClI
~ Cc
m i'.J =or::
< (J) :s::g
(J) m -0 mz
() ):> ~GJ
:x- I () I
,--- N m
m (J)
I -l
-
~ "'U I
"1 en
.i )> ,
~ :::0 m f\
A <
m
Z ,
Q
I
0
-0
m
z
-l
0
r lJl
m
,---
0
~
z
I
11\ ------v~
, X 24-0-
9'-0" 0 I ,:::0 t
ClI X, m):>
TYP lJl <:s::
-< m-o
::;!<O , '-l
"0 ~o
~ ~ ~ ~ 0
-.j (l) (]I .f>.
- '-
'"
..... 'i
b ~
- ~
, ~ ..... i'.J ~
OJ lO 0 i'.J i'.J N i'.J
i'.J (.oJ ./>. U1
- -
- -
C
.
1
1\
~ c ~
OJ
N~JC
-=!
nrDl~: -- <rJ2I~1 'I rf
"v ~ H ,Qf1~ f$
I ~ -I-
~ ~ -~
~ '-'
c
Z
-l
~ ~I )>
- - DL
~~ =
'r ~~o -, <- ~ -->
_ I~ -----. IX )( /2 ~
:-x~~
x" x^ M
Xxx )< ,;:"S '<) ~ x, . ~ J .::; ~ If .- IAI-'
)<X') '" 1ii 0
*v g rglg]~ ;-;11\ II II j
li~ ~ '[-
~ ~~ ..~ ~ ~ ~
~~ Qx u"\ J -- ~
y"-. x"-.'x ~ Iv 7 ~.(
A V IW, ":XV Y'> D. I """"1 ~ of ~J~~]' N
" j; Y:QX 7 ~ "jO F:'c=l~ <
LX" . 1m v" '!'j~~
.VyX: x '^ Xi' ']r1i il" A~ ~I^I
'00 " .x v '" 1[/' 'L;:
x>YV y<x ,Z ':X 7x
;$( :x:.x;; ><^ x :0
r
m
<
m
r
(.oJ
~ I
:t> "'U
fTI 0
~ 0
~ r
II' 0
,- m
q (")
^
r
m
<
m
r
1-
~-
r
1f
~'"
z
!I
,^':X
I
- I
I
-t1
~- --Ff
r
I
-
I
+
+
--L
--L
f -j--+
+ :+:
=+=
I
p::j i
~,
I~
I -
III
~
r
m
<
m
r
,J:l.
c.n
Qo
f/l O'J
()
):>
r
m 0
..... <
--
..... m
01
II :::;0
- )>
q r
r
"'Tl
r
0
0
:::;0
""lJ
r
)>
Z
I II c
z
-i
Z )>
. -
f/lrn
-Ie
0-
;;or
):>g
GlZ
mGl
.
0
-U C
m
Z Z
o:;J-I -I -i
mO
r-u ;'l CD
00
~O
r
0
m
()
^
.
L
.
-
r- III
m
< --
m
r-
.......
Qo
00
I
(J) 0
()
l> <
.-
m m
...... ;0
<J:! )>
II r-
- r-
g "'TI
r- 6'
0
0
;0
1J
r-
)>
Z I '
c I
z
---i
I~ ~ )>
z
c
Z
---i
CD
c
Z
---i
()
v
1-
~
-y
~
~
o
I
"I""""
"I""""
co
I
0'>
co
I
0'>
co
1
0'>
co
1
0'>
co
1
en
'V
_I
CO
'V
1
CO
~
I 3 UNITS
0
.....
0::>
0 3 UNITS
I
(j)
00
0 2 UNITS
I
en
00
0 2 UNITS
1
en
00
0 2 UNITS
,
(j)
0::>
0 2 UNITS I
_I POOL DEC~
(j)
00
00 GARAGE 2
I
.......
-00-- - - . . - -- ~ - . - ~ - & - . .--- - - -
-
00 GARAGE 1
,
.......
GARAGE ELEV "
~L
(0
1
0'>
CD
FEMA FLOOD ZONE
VE-13
o
I
C"?
"I""""
MEAN SEA LEVEL
~ ~t""4
S ~3
~ ~ Z 0
(")~
tI1 Z
I-l
~ O'\N 1-1
~
-....J -....J-....J >
t.I1 ~O
CI'J Cl'JN
..c ..c CI'J
. ...c
~ ~.
~ ~ ~
~
,
__ I
~
1-1
o
~
CJJ
o
c.n
N
rIJ
~
"'fl
r"
+;..N
CJJO\
NN
rlJO
~ rIJ
"~
"'fl"
r" "'fl
r"
o
z
~
::c
-
~
tTl
CIJ
~
o
CIJ
4r
=i*'
".
~
~
o
~
t1
o
~
00
~
Iorj
rot
~~
t!13
~z
~C)
(")
t!1
......N
o?i::oo......
QCl(.J1
00(.J1
..c 00
'..c
Iorj'
rot Iorj
rot
(j
Z
~
...,
Cj
o
z
~
:r:
-
~
tTJ
r./J
~
o
r./J
~
~--"..
PlIle\las County Property AppF-<:er InformatIOn OS 29 IS 1636200700"1"\
""t
Pdge20f5
~
05 / 29 / 15 /
16362 / 007 / 0050
OZ-Sep-2004 J H'l Sfln th , CFA Plnellas County Property Appralser 15 00: 07
Ownershlp Inforr-.atlon lion -Reside n t lal Property Address, Use, and Sales
LAHER BEACH CLUB LLC OSK 13415 OPG, 2092
200 BRIGHT~ATER DR # 7
CLEAR~ATER Fl 33767-2452
Co r-.p ar ab Ie sales value as Prop Addr 15 A UA LOti ST
o f J an 1, 2003, based on Census Tract 260.02
sales fror-. 2002 - 2003,
0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Prlce (Qual/UnQ) Vac/Ir-.p
Plat Inforr-.ation 3 12,004 13,41512,092 1. 050, 000 (Q) I
1925' Book 011 Pgs 005- 10/z,002 12,273/2,235 530.000 (Q) I
0000 Book Pgs - 0 11,971 3,680/ 687 8,000 (0) I
0000 Book Pgs - 0 10 0/ 0 0 ( )
2004 Value E XEMP T IONS
Jus t/Market. 700,000 Hor-.estead' NO Ownershlp % .000
Govt Exer-. tW Use % .000
Assessed/Cap: 700,000 Instltutional Exer-.. tW Tax Exef"llpt %: 000
H~storlc Exef"ll 0
Taxable 700,000 AgrJ.cultural' 0
2'0'03 Tax Inforf"llatlon
DJ.strJ.ct' CW Seawall Frontage
Clearwate r Vlew Water
03 MJ.llage' 23.0851 Land Slze Unit Land Land Land
Front x Depth PrJ.ce Units Meth
03 Tax 8S . 10, 734 57
1) 50 x 64 110 00 3,175.00 5
Speclal Tax 00 2) 0 x 0 00 00
3) 0 x 0 00 .00
Wl thout the Save-Our-Hof"lles 4) 0 x 0 00 00
cap, 2003 taxes wlll be 5) 0 x 0 . 00 00
10,734 57 6) 0 x 0 00 00
Wlthout any exer-.ptlons,
2003 taxes will be
10,734 57
Short Legal CLEARt",IATER BEACH REU BLK 7, II 63 5fT Of LOT 5
Descrlptlon
Building InformatIOn
http I/pao co pmellas f1 us/htbm/cgl-scr3?0=I&a=1&b=I&c=1&r= 16&s=4&t3=1&u=0&p
91212004
I.
PIl1_~llas County Property Appr ~ ~":r InfonnatlOn OS 29 15 16362 007 O(1CI\
Page 3 of5
PI op-erty and Land Use Code descngtJons
05 / 29 / 15 /
16362 / 007 /
:01
0050
O:Z:-Sep-Z004 JlM SMlth, CFA Plnellas County Property Appral8er 15 00:01
COMMerclal Card 01 of 1 IMproveMent Type Hotels Res Const
Property Address 15 AUALO~ ST Prop Use 313 Land Use 39
Structural Elements
Foundatlon
Floor SysteM
Eyterlor Wall
Helght Factor
Party Wall
Structural Fra(1)e
Roo f Fra(1)e
Roof Cover
Cab~net &. Mlll
Floor F~nlsh
Interior F~nlsh
Total Un~t8
Spec~al Footing
Wood wi Subfloor
Frame Stucco
o
~one
~one
Gable 3: Hip
Compos~t~on Sh~ngle
Average
Car-pet
Plaster Fur-r-ed
6
Heatlng &. Air Heating&Cooling Pckg
F~xtures 18
6ath T11e
Electr1c
Shape Factor
Quallty
Year Bu i1 t
EffectlVe Age
Other Deprec~at1on
Functlon Oeprec~atlon
EconoM~c Deprec~at~on
tlone
Aver-age
Rectangle
Average
1,935
15
o
o
o
Sub Areas
Descrlption Factor Area Descrlpt~on Factor Area
1) Base Al'ea 1. 00 1,610 7) 00 0
2) Ut~l~ty . 35 136 8) 00 0
3) Open POl'ch ZO H2 9) . 00 0
4) Upper Stry Base Area 90 L 356 10) 00 0
5) .00 0 11) 00 0
6) .00 0 12) 00 0
Commercial Extra Features
Oescrlptlon DlMenslons Pr~ce Un~t8 Value ReO Year
1) PATIO/DECK 6X46 10 00 276 0 1,270 1,982
2) ASPHALT 6XZOO 1 50 I,ZOO 0 1,800 999
3) 00 0 0 0 0
4) .00 0 0 0 0
5) .00 0 0 0 0
6) 00 0 0 0 0
TO TA L RECORD VALUE 3.070
Map With Property Address (non-vacant)
~~[!][!]g][SJ
hnp //pao eo pmellas fl us/htbll1/cgl-scr3?0=I&a=1&b=1&c=1&r= 16&s=4&t3=1&u=0&p
9/2/2004
,>,
PI!1~llas County Property Appr'" ~er Information 05 29 15 16362 007 ore f)
OF
ME X Ie 0
I
I
I
I
j
I
l
,
I
l
I
,/
V,""--' qT
IS L- - ---.J
GLENDAL
'31
~
Page 4 of 5
631
MAND AL A '{ 1
ftVE
\~AN"'O tL /!.. Y
AVE
JUANI
60i
1\,1 /J, liRi~ ,A. Y
601
~""ANDALA 'r
AvE E
o
7
.' HEILWO
I 51
,
I
,
I
I
I
I
,
I
,
I
j
I
.'
I
j
1
-
a::
Cl
KENDALL
10
BAY
ESPLANADE
21
I<ENOilLL
g;T
32
BAY
SPLA!~AD
l
CLEARWATER
5T
liS Mile Aerial Photograph (2002)
http / /pao co pll1ellas fl us/htbm!cgI-scr3 ?o= 1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &c= I &r= 16&s=4&t3= 1 &u=O&p
9/2/2004
Pmellas County Property Appr~ ~er InfonnalIon 0529 IS ] 6362 007 or"::f) Pdge 4 of5
~5 L- - ----=.J
OF GLE~DAL 631 6
51 M,tI NAq;t A '( ~INSI
16 A
H IL\ D
51
viE X I C 0 v1aNOALA Y
AVE
, rml
j
I Pl I
1
I .p-)
I E
I -q-
I r-J
I
I
I
,
j IOJ
I AVA
I
I
I I~
I
I
I
7
- LLfl
cr
, CJ AY
I JUANI
I
I KENDALL ,
I
15D3
A.NOAL,I.\'I ~Ol~~~
I l<ntrlaLL b.VE
I I~ 32
.r:6T
[Sp~a~auE 0 8A. Y
" SPLANAO 601
" 8NOALAl <10
I BA.Y
A\/[ ~ LAN
,
,
I
CLEARWATER ST (St
1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002)
http //pao co ptnellas fl uslhtbll1/cgl-c!Ick?o= 1 &a= 1 &b=l &c= 1 &r= 16&s=4&t3=1 &u=O&p 9/2/2004
Pmel.las County Property Appr~ ~er InformatIon 05 29 15 16362 00700<::1)
Page 5 of 5
,
I
~
, "
'4
,
"i
4;
,
>Yf
';~
"I
.
~
,
...
'll
,,<
... t
, ,
...
...
i '.
i
, l'~I'
y
~ ,I
I' @
-
, II
~ '
1
i
~
, v
Pinellas County Property Appraiser
Parcel Information
http //pao co pmellas fl us/htbm/cgl-ehek?o=l&a=l&b=l&c=l&r= 16&s=4&t3=1&u=0&p
9/2/2004
,~
PlI:!,ellas County Property App"'''' "er Information 0529 15 16362007 Or'-'1
Page 5 of5
11
~. t
~
. "
, t
/
~ ,4;
" ,~
,
~
~
~
~ "
~ t,
.
'lI
.
'l.
1*'
~--:,:-:<e{~ ~W ~'ZZ,
't
Pinellas County Property Appraiser
JI,
Parcel Information
Bach to Search Pdg~
An exglanatlon of tlllS screen
http Ilpao co pll1el1as fl uslhtbm/cg]-scr3?0=I&a=l&b=l&c=I&r= 16&s=4&t3=I&u=0&p
9/2/2004
f
Pmellas County Property Appr~" "r InformatIOn OS 29 15 16362 007 00(-1\
.
Page 2 of5
05 / 29 / 15 / 16362 / 007 / 0140
OZ-Sep-ZOO4 J1M 5M1th, CFA P1nellas County Property Appra1ser 15.01.51
Ownersh1p InforMat1on Non-Resl.dential Prope rty Address. Use, and Sales
CROOKER. ALLAN J OSK, 04742 OPG 0683
16 KEtlOALL 5T
CLEARWATER fL 33767-1624
COMparable sales value as Prop Addr, 16 KEtmAlL ST
of Jan 1, 2003, based on Census Trac t 260.02
sales frOM 2002 - 2003,
0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Pr1ce (Qual/UnQ) Vac / IMp
Plat InforMation 0 /1.969 3.199/ 210 55,000 (U) I
19 Z 5' Book 011 Pgs 005- 0 /0 0/ 0 0 ( )
0000 Sook Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 ( )
0000' Sook Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 ( )
2004 Value EXEMP T IONS
Just/Market' 5ZI,300 HOMestead, NO Ownersh1p % .000
Govt Exer>1, NO Use %, 000
Assessed/Cap: 521.300 Instltut10nal ExeM, 110 Tax Exer>1p t %, 000
Historlc Exer>1 0
T ayable, 5Z1,300 Agrlcultural 0
2003 TaJ~ Inforr>1atlon
Distrlct CW Seawall Frontage
Clearwater Vlew'
03 Mlllage' Z3 0851 Land S1ze Unlt Land Land Land
Front x Depth Prlce Units Meth
03 Taxes 10,76Z Z1
1) 50 x 111 110 00 5.575.00 5
Speclal Tax 00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00
3) o x 0 .00 00
W1thout the Save-Our-Hor>1es 4) 0 x 0 00 00
cap, 2003 taxes w1l1 be 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00
10.76Z Z7 6) 0 x 0 00 .00
Wlthout any exer>1ptions,
2003 taxes w1l1 be
10.762.21
Short Legal CLEARWATER BEACH REU BLK 7. LOT 14 8: 5 23.5FT
Descrlption OF LOT 5
Building Information
http Ilpao co pmellas fl us/htb] n/cgl-chck?o= 1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &c= 1 &r= 16&s=4&t3= 1 & u=O&p
9/212004
PlI1ellas County Property Appr"'-~"'r In[onnatlon 0529 IS 16362 007 OO~()
.
Page 30[5
05 / 29 /
15 /
16362 / 007 / 0140
:01
OZ-Sep-Z004 Jl~ S~lth, CFA Plnellas County Property Appralser 15-01'51
Co~~erc~al Card 01 of 1 I~prove~ent Type. Hotel/Hotel ( 4 St
Proper ty Address 16 KENOA II S T Prop Use' 313 L and Use. 39
Structural Elements
Foundat~on
Floor Syste~
E^terlor Wall
He~ght Factor
Party Wall
Structural Fra~e
Roof Fra~e
Roof Cover
Cab~net & M~ll
Floor F~n~sh
Interior F~nish
Total Un~ts
Contlnuous Footlng
Slab on Grade
Conc Block/Stucco
o
None
t{one
flat
Built Up/coMpositlon
Average
Carpet COMbination
Plaster Furred
10
Heatlng & Alr Heating&Coollng Pckg
F 1)0: tures 30
Bath Tile
Electrlc
Shape Factor
Quall ty
Year BUllt
Effective Age
Other Depreclation
Functlon Depreclatlon
Econo~lc Depreciatlon
Wall Only
Average
Rectangle
Ave rage
1.957
Z5
o
o
o
Sub Areas
Descrlptlon Factor Area Descrlption Factor Area
1) Base Area 1 00 1. 680 7) ,00 0
2) Utll1ty 55 780 8) , 00 0
3) Open Porch 30 890 9) _ 00 0
4) Upper Stry Base A rea 90 1.680 10) _ 00 0
5) 00 0 11) .00 0
6) 00 0 12 ) 00 0
Commercial Extra Features
Descrlptlon Dl~ensions Prlce Unlts Value RCD Year
1) ASPHALT 9XZOO 1. 50 1. 800 0 Z.700 999
2) 00 0 0 0 0
3) .00 0 0 0 0
4) _ 00 0 0 0 0
5) .00 0 0 0 0
6) 00 0 0 0 0
TO TA L RECORD VALUE' Z.700
1\1ap With Property Address (non-vacant)
~~[t][!]~[SJ
http //pao co pmellas fl us/htbll1/cgl-chek?o=l&a=l&b=l&c=I&r= 16&s=4&t3=1&u=0&p
9/2/2004
PlIlellas County Property Appr~" ~~r Information OS 29 15 16362 007 own
,
ME X \ CO
I
I
I
I
I
f
"
,
I
J
,
!
,
,
I
I
,
I
Page 4 of 5
,,~A.rrdAL.A 'I
AVE
,JUAN
603
M~J~OALA't
AVE
601
:\lj~ hJDALA',
AVE E-
,--
, A ~f) l
1~ I
7
~-J
,
j
I
.
j
,
,
I
AVA
,
I
-
y
y
Q::
CJ
K
KENDALL
10
BAY
ESPLANADE
21
KEr>.JOAL L
gsT
32
BAY
SPLAtJAO
CLEARWATER
ST
I
f
r-- - ----.
1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002)
http //pao co pmellas fl uslhtbm/cg]-chck?o=l&a=l&b=l&c=I&r= 16&s=4&t3=1&u=0&p 9/2/2004
Pmel}as County Property Appr'- ~~r Information 05 29 15 16362 007 OWl)
Page 2 of5
05 / 29 /
15 / 16362 / 007 / 0060
02-Sep-2004 JJ.M Srnth, CFA PJ.nellas County Property AppraJ.ser 15: 0 I 04
OwnershJ.p InforMatlon Resident~al Property Add res!>, Use. and Sales
HC SHITH I1IC OBK, 09663 OPG: 1360
C/O WILSON
2440 ROBERTA 1I1
CLEARWATER fL 33764-6585
COMparable sales value as Prop Addr' 11 AVA LO II 51
of Jan 1, 2003, based on Census Tract' 260.02
sales frOM 2002 - 2003,
299,400 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/ UnQ) Vac/IMp
Plat InforMatlon 4 /1,997 9.663/1. 360 112,000 (Q) I
1925 Book 011 Pgs 005- 0 /1,967 2,731/ 663 1.100 (U) I
0000 Book Pgs - 0 10 01 0 0 ( )
0000 Book Pgs - 0 10 01 0 0 ( )
2004 Value EXEMP T IONS
Just/Market' 255.100 HOMestead' NO OwnershJ.p % .000
Govt ExeM tW Use '.t 800
Assessed/Cap 255,100 InstJ.tutJ.onal EX8M' NO Tax ExeMpt ',t, .800
HJ.storJ.c Exel'"l, 0
Taxable 255,100 AgriCUltural: 0
2003 Tax In forl'"latJ.on
DJ.strlct CW Seawall Frontage'
Clearwater VJ.8W
03 Mlllage, 23.0851 Land Slze Unit Land Land Land
Front x Depth Price Units Meth
03 Taxes 5.485.02
1) 50 x 87 60.00 4.350 00 5
5pecJ.al Tax 00 2) 0 x 0 .00 00
3) 0 x 0 00 00
Wlthout the Save-Our-HoMes 4) 0 x 0 00 .00
cap, 2003 ta...es wJ.ll be 5) 0 x 0 00 .00
5,485 02 6) o x 0 00 _ 00
WJ.thout any exeMptlons,
2003 taxes wlll be
5.485 02
Short Legal CLEARWATER BEACH REU BLK 7. LOT 6
DescrJ.ptlon
Building Information
http //pao co pmellas n llslhtbmlcgl-click?o=l&a=l&b=l&c=I&r= 16&s=4&t3=I&u=0&p
9/2/2004
Pmel)as County Property Appr' ~er Infom1atlOn OS 29 15 16362007 OWl)
Page 3 of5
05 I 29 I
15 I
16362 I 007 I 0060
:01
OZ-Sep-Z004 J1M SM1th, CFA Pinellas County Property Appra1ser 15 01-04
Res1dent1al Card 01 of I Prop Use, ZIO Land Use' 01 L1v1ng Unlts I
IMP Type Slngle Faroil~ Prop Address 17 AUAlON ST
Structural
Elements
Foundat1on
Floor 5ysteM
Exterior Wall
Roof FraMe
Roof Cover
Cont1nuous Wall
Wood
Frame/Stucco
Flat-Shed
B U Tar'&Gravel/Othr
Qual1ty
Year BUllt
Effectlve Age
Heatlng
Coollng
F1xtures
Other Depreclat10n
Funct10nal Depreclat10n
EcononoM1c Depreclation
Average
1,9 Z 3
Z5
Central Duct
C00110g (Central)
3
o
o
o
M Storles I 0
Floor Fln1sh Crpt/HdTI/HdHar/Prqt
Interlor Flnlsh Drywall/Plaster
Sub
Areas
Descr1ptlon Factor Area Descr1ptlon Factor Area
1) Base Area I. 00 81ti 7) ,00 0
2) Open Porch _ ZO 3Z 8) 00 0
3) _ 00 0 9) .00 0
4) 00 0 10) _ 00 0
5) 00 0 11) 00 0
6) 00 0 12) 00 0
Residential Extra Features
Descr1ptlon DlrrJenslons Prlce Unlts Value ReO Year
1) PATIO/DECK 145sf 3 00 145 0 180 L 9Z3
2) PATIO/DECK 10XZO 3 00 ZOO 0 250 1.980
3) 00 0 0 0 0
4) DO 0 0 0 0
5) 00 0 0 0 0
6) DO 0 0 0 0
TO TA L RECORD VA LU E 430
1\1ap With Property Address (non-vacant)
~~[t][!]g][SJ
http IlpdO co pmellas fluslhtbm/cg] -chck?o= I &a= 1 &b= 1 &c= 1 &r= 16&s=4&t3= 1 &u=O&p
9/212004
P]~ellJ.s County Property Appr '~r r nfonnatJon 05 29 15 16362 007 or;::"
Page 5 0[5
-.,-- -
-
,.
"
'"
,., '
'" t"
III
,
,.
~
PinelIas County Property Appraiser
Parcel Information
http //pao co plllellas f1 us/htblll/cg]-chck?o=l &a=1 &b=l&c=l&r= 16&s=4&t3=1&u=0&p 9/2/2004
I.
"'
"
CITY OF CLEARWATER
NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS
The, Commumty Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Flonda, will hold public heanngs on fuesday, November
16, 2004, begmmng at 2 00 pm, m the City Council Chambers, m City Hdll, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Avenue,
Clearwater, Flonda, to comlder the followmg requests.
NOTE All persons wlshme to address an Item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meetme [hose cases
that are not contested bv the applicant. staff. nelehbormr.>: property owners, etc. will be placed on d consent al!enda
and approved bv a smele vote at the ber.>:mnme of the meetme
1 (cant from 10/19/04) 1504 Garden Inc. IS req ucstmg a Flexl ble Development approval to penrut retail sales wlthm an
ex]stmg two-story commercial bUlldmg With a reductIOn to lot area from 10,000 sq ft to 7,720 sq ft, a reductIOn to lot Width
(west) from 100 ft to 5081 ft, reductIOns to the front (north) setbdck from 25 ft to 19 ft (to eXlstmg and propo&cd bUlldmg)
dnd from 25 ft to 14 ft (to proposed pavement), a reductIon to the front (west) setbdck from 25 ft to 15 ft (to proposed
pavement), reductIOns to the ~]de (south) setback from 10 ft to one-foot (to ex]stmg and proposed bUlldmg) and from 10 ft
to zero ft (to proposed pavement) dnd a reductIOn to reqUIred Pdrkmg from 5 to 45 spaces per 1,000 sq ft, d& d
Comprehen&]ve Infill Redevelopment ProJect, under the provlslOns of SectIOn 2-704 C, and a reductIOn to the landscape
buffer along the south property Ime from 5 ft to zero ft and a reductIOn m the Width of the reqUired foundatIOn land,>cdpmg
ddJacent to the bUlldmg (west slde) from 5 ft to 3 75 ft, ~s part of a ComprehenSive Landscape Program, under Ihe
proVISIOns of SectIOn 3-1202 G (Proposed Use Retail sales and services) dt 503 Marshall St, E A Marshall's Sub, Lot
10 & W Y2 ofvac alley on E FLD2004-02010
2 (cant from 10/19/04) Clearwater Seashell Resort. L.C. ]S requestIng a Flex]ble Development apphcatlOn to amend a
prevIOusly approved FL 01-01-01 (COB approved on Fcbmary 20, 2001) to permit dn additIOnal 24 overnight
accommodatIOn umts from the density pool (m add]tlOn to the prevIOusly approved 250 overnight accommodatIOn umts) as
d rruxed use, with a maximum of 70,000 sq ft of amemtles dC<'CSSOry to the hotel and a rrummum of 400 public parkmg
spaces, as a ComprehenSive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the prOVISIOns of SectIOn 2-803 C [Proposed Use. Hotel
of 150 rooms (153 37 rooms/acre on total s]te), 18 attached dwellings (II 04 umb/ acre on total s]te) dnd d maximum 0 f
70,000 sq ft (0 98 FAR on total site) of am em ties accessory to the hotel, at a height of 150 ft (to roof deck)] at 229 and 301
South Gulf view Boulevard and 230.300 and 304 Coronado Dnve (Related to OV A2004-00002), Lloyd-Wlute Skmner
Sub, Lots 57,58,59, 104, 105 & 106 and part of Lots 56, 103, & 107 FLD2004~07052
3 (cont from 10119/04) EllIs & Co. Ltd. a Flonda L1rruted Patnersh]p 1S requestmg a FleXible Development approval for
the change of u"e of an eXlstmg automobIle service statIon to a 2,266 sq ft restaurant, With a reduction to the front (west)
setback from 25 ft to 15 ft (to pavement), a reductlon of the front (north) setback from 25 ft to 15 ft (to pavement),
redu<.tlOns of the ..]de (east) setback from 10 ft to 3 ft (to bUlldmg), from 10 ft to zero ft (to extenor seatmg wood deck), and
from 10 ft to zero ft (to dump"ter enclosure), a reductIon of the slde (south) setbdck from 10 ft to zero ft (to pavement) and
from 10 ft to 2 ft (to dumpster enclosure), a reductIOn m the reqUired parkmg from 34 spaces to 21 space.., d& a
ComprehenSIve Tnfin Redevelopment Project, under the proVISIOns of SectIon 2-704 C, and as part of a ComprehenSive
Landscape Program, undcr the proVISIOns of SectIOn 3-1202 G (Proposed Use Restaurant) at 2201 Gulf to Bav
Boulevard, Sec 18-29-16, M&B 32/04 and 32/05 FLD2004-08058
4 (cont from 10/19/04) DaVid A. & Sharon A Cote are reque&tmg a FleXible Development approval for (I) the
TermmatIon of Status of Nonwnformlty for denSity for thc purpose of addmg a two-car garage, under the proVISIons of
SectIOn 6-109, and (2) the expanSIOn of attached dwellmgs With a reductIOn to the front (north) setback from 25 ft to 20 ft
(to bUlldmg) and a reductIOn to thc Side (south) "etback from 1 0 ft to 5 ft (to bUIlding), as a Resldentldl Infi1l Project, under
the prov]SlOns of SectIOn 2-203 C, and a reductIOn to the landscape buffer along the south property line from lOft to 5 ft, as
part of a ComprehenSive Landscape Program, under the prOVISIons of SectIon 3-1202 G (Proposed Use' ConstructIOn of a
3 car attached garage m associatIOn WIth an ex]stlng nonconfonmng attached dwelhng (duplex)] at 115 North Kevstone
Drive, Keystone Manor, Elk 0, Lot I & 20 FLD2004-06044
5 Allan J Crooker / Lamer Beach Club. LLC I McSm]th. Ine are requesting (I) fermllldtlon of Status of
Non<.onformlty for denSity (15 overnight accommodatIOn umts - to be converted to II dwellmg umts), under the provisions
of Se<.tlon 6-109, (2) Flexlble Development approval to permit a total of 13 attached dwellmgs m the MedIUm HIgh DenSIty
Resldentldl (MHDR) D]stnct and Tounst (T) Dlstnct WIth reductlOn& to lot area III the MHDR Dlstnct from 15,000 ~q fl to
H,700 &g ft and m the T DIStTlCt from 10,000 "q ft to 4,350 sq ft reductIOns to lot WIdth III the MHDR DIstnct from 150 ft to
100 ft and Jl1 the T Dl"tTlct from 1 00 ft to 50 ft, reductron& to the front (north dlong Avalon Street - MHDR DI"tnct) setback
~
from 25 ft to 10 A: (to bUlldmg) and from 25 H to LCro t1 (to dumpster ~tdgmg pad), a reductIOn to thE.. ~Ide (we~] - MHDR
, DI<;tnct) from 10 ft to zero ft (to bUlldmg), d reduUlon to the rear (south - M H DR Dlstnct) from 15 H to lOft (to bUlldmg),
a reductIOn to the front (~outh along Kendel]] Strect - T Dlstnct) from 15 ft to lOft (to buddtng), a reductIOn to the side
(we<;t - T District) from lOft to zero ft (to budding), an Increase to bUIlding heIght III the MHDR Dlstnct from 30 ft and III
the T Dlstnct from 35 ft to 695ft (to roof deck) wllh pcnmeter parapets of 3 67 ft (from roof deck) and decoraltve rQot
structures of 101ft (from roof deck) and to permIt d bUlldmg wlthm the VISibility trldngles, as a ReSIdential Infill ProJect 111
the MHDR Dlstnet and as a ComprehenSive Infill Redevelopment Project In the T Dlstnct, under the prOVlSlOns of Sections
2-404 F and 2-803 C, (3) ReductIon to the front perimeter buffer along Avalon Street III the MHDR DI<;tnct from 10 ft to
zero ft (to dumpster staglllg pad) and a reductIOn to the SIde (west) landscape buffer III the MHDR Dlstnct from] 0 ft to zero
ft (to bUlldlllg), as a ComprehenSIve Landscape Plan, under the provlslOns of SectIOn 3-1202 G, and (4) Transfer of
Development Rlght<; (TDR2004-08008) of one dwellmg umt to thiS sIte from 321 Coronado Dnve, under the proVISIOns of
Section 4-1402 (Proposed Use Attached dwellmg~ -13 condominIUm umts) at 15-17 Avalon St & 16 Kendall St.,
ReVised Mdp of Clearwater Beach, Blk 7, Lots 5, 6 & 14 FL02004-08059
6 Schlau Properties Co are requestmg a FleXIble Development approvdl to allow RetaIl Sales and Service (a funeral
home) df> a pnmary use m the Office Zomng Dlstnct, with a reductIOn ofthe front setback from 25 ft to 13 ft (to pavement),
reductIOns of the Side (east) setback from 20 ft to 4 ft (to bUlldmg and &Idewalk), a reductIOn of the SIde (west) setbdck from
20 ft to 8 ft (to pavement), and a reductIon of the rear setback from 20 ft to II ft (to pavement), as a ComprehenSIve Infill
Redevelopment Project under the prOVISIOns of SectIon 2-1004 Band af> d ComprehenSive Landscape Plan, under the
provlslOns of SectIOn 3-]202 G (Proposed Use. Funeral Home) at 1425 Sunset Pomt Rd., Sec 02-29-15, M&B 3206
F 1,02004-06043
7 Ocean Pronertles of Clearwater. LLC are requestmg a FleXIble Development approval to penmt retat! sales wlthm an
eXlstmg one-story commercIal bUlldmg WIth reductIOns to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to SIX feet (to eXlstmg
bUlldmg) and from 25 feet to 125 feet (to proposed pavement), a reductIOn to the Side (south) setback from 10 feet to four
feet (to eXlstmg and proposed pavement), as a FleXible Development Project, under the proVISIOns of SectIOn 2-704 N, and
reductIOns to the landscape buffers along the south property line from five feet to four feet and a reductIOn m the front
(west) landscapmg adjacent to the bUlldmg (west Side) from 15 feet to SIX feet, as part of a ComprehenSIVe Landscape
Program, under the provI~lOns of SectIOn 3-] 202 G (Proposed Use: RetaIl Sales and ServIces) at 111 S. Belcher Rd , See
]8-29-]6, M&B 2303 FLD2004-07054
8 Cltv of Clearwater arc requestmg a FleXible Development approval to permIt a SOCial public service agency m the
Instltuttonal Dlstnct, Wlth deVIatIOns to allow d soctal public service agency adjacent to resldentmlly zoned propcrty and to
allow a SOCIal pubhe ~ervlce agency Wlthm 1,500 ft of an eXlstmg SOCial public servIce agency, as a ComprehenSive Infil1
Redevelopment Project, under the proVISIOns of SectIOn 2-] 204 A (Proposed Use: Non-profit educatIOnal trammg faclhty)
at 1250 Palmetto St, See 10-29-15, M&B 13 05 FL02004-08060
9 Robert D Ba..ham (owner) Sandra Bntton IS requestmg an appeal of the deCISIOn ofa Level One apphcdtJOn (FleXIble
Standard Development ease FLS2004-05033), under the proVISIOns of Seelton 4-50 I, that approved an apphcatlOn reducmg the
front (east) setback from 25 ft to 10 ft (to bUIldmg), reducmg the front (south) setback from 25 ft to 10 ft (to bUlldmg),
mcreasmg the height of a wall from 3 ft to 7 ft m the front (ea~t and south) setbacks, as part of a Resldenttal J nfill ProJ ect, under
the provI:'>lon<; of SectIOn 2-203 C (Proposed Use: ConstructIOn of a detached dwelhng) at 752 Eldorado Ave., Mandalay
Sub, Blk 4, Lot I APP2004-00007
Interested partIes may appear and be heard at the hcanngs or file wntten notKc of appro va] or objectIOn WIth the Planmng
DIrector or CIty Clerk pnor to the heanngs Any person who deCides to appedl any deCISIOn made by the Board, With
respect to ,my matter conSldued at such heanngs, Will need to reque<;t and obtam party .,tdtuS by the Board dunng the case
dISCUSSIOn, a record of the proceedmgs and, for such purpose, may need to en')ure that a verbatim record of the proceedmgs
IS made, which record mc1udes the testimony and eVidence upon WhlCh the appeal IS to be based per F\onda Statute
2860] 05 Commuruty Development Code SectIOn 4-206 slate:'> that party status shall be granted by the Board lf person
requesting such demonstrate~ that s/he IS &ubstantla1!y affected Pdrty status entItIes partles to per<;onal1y testify, present
eVidence, argument and wltnes~es, cross-examme wltncsse<;, appeal the decl~lon and speak on reconsIderatIOn request<;
An oath wll1 be admlm~tered swcdnng .Ill partlclpant~ III pubhe heanng case& If you w1sh to speak please Walt to bc
recogmzed, then state and spell your name dnd proVide your dddrc,><; Persons speaking before the CDS shall be !tmlted to
three mmutef> unle<;s an mdlvldudl IS representlllg a group m whIch case the Chairperson may authonzc a rea<;onable amount
of tune up to 10 mmutes
,-,
..
rIVe days pnor to the meetmg, staff report~ and recomrnendiltlOm on the above request~ WI!! be avallab]e for reView by
mterested partIes between the hours of 8 30 ,\ m and 4 30 pm, weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planmng Department,
]00 S Myrtle Ave, Clearwater, FL 33756 Please eontdct Frank Gerlock, Development Review Manager, at 562-4557 to
discuss any questIOns or concerns dbout the project dndlor to better under~tdnd the proposal and review the site pldll
Thl~ notice was sent by the OfficIal Records and Leglsldtlve SerVices Department, CynthIa E Goudedu, CMC, Oty Clerk
Cyndl Tarapam
Planmng Department
CynthIa E Goudeau, CMC
City Clerk
City ofC]earwaler POBox 4748, Clearwater, FI., 33758-4748
NOTE Applicant or representative must be present at the heanng
YOU ARE BEING SENT [HIS NOTICE IF YOU ARE THE APPLICANT OR OWN PROPERTY WITHIN 200 FT OF
THE SUBJECT PROPERTY
A COpy 01<- THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN THE OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE
SERVICES DEPT ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN
ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL THE OFFICIAL RECORDS AND
LEGISLATIVE SERVICES DEPT WITH THEIR REOUEST AT (727) 562-4090
Ad t 0/31104
~
...
""
November 1,2004
()RIGINAL
NOV 4 2004
Community Development Board
CIty of Clearwater
100 S Osceola Street
Clearwater, FL
Dear Board Members,
PLANNING & rJEVELOPMENT
SERVICES
CITY OF CLEARWATER
t__
Re: Project "Ambiance on White Sands", 16 Kendall Street, 15 Avalon
Street, 17 Avalon Street
I, am writing thIs letter In response to the above project I myself, currently own
24 Avalon & 635 Bay Esplanade, Clearwater Beach I think this condo project IS
Just what our area needs The condos will provide a new look As neighbors to
the project It Will Increase the overall look of our North Beach area
After revIewing the plans, the underground parking IS a definIte plus ThIS will not
Infnnge on our already limIted parkIng
As for the deSIgns, I think they will compliment the changes currently taking
place, In our neIghborhood ThiS IS what we have all been waitIng for, the rebIrth
of our deslra e North ClealWater Beach
I strong s pp rt thiS effort to Improve our area, and hope that you do so as well
CommunIty Development Board
CIty of Clearwater
100 S Osceola Street
Clearwater, FL
ORIGINAL
NOV 4 2004 I .
,
November 1,2004
Dear Board Members,
PLANNING & OE\'ELOPMEN1
SERVICES
CITY OF CLE,\RWATER
Project "Ambiance on White Sands", 16 Kendall Street, 15 Avalon Street, 17
Avalon Street
I am writing regardmg the condo project I have recently revIewed the projected
plans and I think they are great I own property In the area, 629 Mandalay and
would love to see a project like thIs to take place
end the board to support this project
-.. r"'\' '-"111 I fI I
November 3,2004
Community Development Board
City of Clearwater
100 S Osceola Street
Clearwater, FL
ORIGINAL
Dear Board Members,
Project: "Ambiance on White Sands", 16 Kendall Street, 15 Avalon Street,
& 17 Avalon Street
I, Dr Panos Vaslloudes recently saw the plans for the condos, I thmk they are
beautiful ThIs IS Just what we need I not only own 26 Avalon, Just down the
street, but also 637 & 641 Bay Esplanade, and I would love to see this take
place
I strongly urge the board t
_........--.---- -'"I
(
--O)~(C~~-~~ \D'~\ ,
Jil NOV Ull4 l01
PLANNING & OEVELOPMEN1
SERVICES
CITY OF CLEARWATER
November 2,2004
Community Development Board
City of Clearwater
100 S Osceola Street
Clearwater, FL
Dear Board Members,
ORIGINAL
I am writing regarding the condo project located at
16 Kendall Street, 15 Avalon Street, 17 Avalon Street
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES
ClTY OF CLEARWATER
HUGO E.1IlA1IN. Jll.
lOll" W WOLF
C. FA TRICK LU TU<Bll.Ol
HAROL1>' III.-"NCHllT JII
1IA VJD L TlJIlf([K
Kt/lNEnI 'II' KABLE
E. LllUIi5 OQIl'lMITI
WIU.LUU iWAUl
.....N II oJ QUINN
8ROCll L DAUI V>II'U
J>:I'FREY l. ENDUN
ROBERT A KENDRK;lC
CHAIlu.s A. GUn:.. n1E1l
lllOMA$ R. "~l'I.OW
IOHN A IlEO<l<R
MICIIAU", Mll~1I
TIM011lY L CI1IlTJSS
GlU:(;Ol<Y l!. MnEB.
PANIEL S. PI'PO;RMAN
SCOTT C. '""" TrARl>
GIl.rCORY T DWERS
CilAIC W 1l0R/!
P11IU.1PJ STAHLE
BRAUN KENDRICK FINKBEINER P Le.
ATTORNEVSAT LAw
F\lANCIS l.kEATINC
1iFfRE:Y C Wl1.$ON
BIUAIO f !lAVER
JIJ PITH A Ul<COUI
CU:NIl L flTKlN III
81UA1O S. MAKAIll(:
tAMlli IlEC1lT KlSlIllS
WOlML i WOOLlY
I!lLIU'C E CRANE
DAVID J. nrPPl[RT
TBOMfoS J.llum
H WlUJAMMARnK
LOlllUolNE S. fASKlEWICl.
i'IlI:IIERlCK C. OViIIDIEII
GAilY l!. GllIlMO_
G~c.scvrr
MANVEL TRICE III
MIlA BIRON IIY......
TlMDnlY S ARI'!OU>
JOSHUA A.1II.IC>fflS
IU TT11E'N 1). _AUG1ITON
CEOIIC!H WVATTIII
'AM ES Y FlN](JIK1I(EIII'Jl-l-2lIUl
J. JUCIlAIlD KEflDIllCk IO'&-:lOIll
4301 FASHION SQUARE BOULEVARD
SAGINAW, MICHIGAN 48603-5218
DF COll!'SEl.
101IIIW MoGRAW
JOlIN E.II.IECIUIl
TELEPHONE; (98') 498-ZlOO
FAX <'89) 799-4666
www.bkf-lllw rom
MY pLEASANT
l"$9)n5-7-llll
FAX. lJI91 TlS-J76I
MlDLAlIiIID
~7
'All ImI6Jl.-
November 1, 2004
ORIGINAL
Community Development Board
C1ty of Clearwater
100 Osceola Street
Clearwater Beach, FL 33758
Dear Board Members:
My w~fe and I res1de at 8 Cambr1a, Un1t 303, Clearwater Beach,
Flor1da. We have owned that property for about e1ght years. In
January, we w1l1 be movlng 1nto a new condom1n1um unit (6B) be~ng
constructed Just north of our present res1dence and located at 14
Somerset. That condom1n~um bU11d~ng replaced an older, small motel
which had become an "eyesore" dur1ng ~ts later years. The newly
bu~lt condom1n1um bu~ld1ng has been arch1tecturally des1gned 1n a
way that 1t enhances the ent1re ne1ghborhood.
It ~s my understand1ng that a s1m1lar proJect 1S now be1ng
considered about 5 blocks south of our present locat1on between
Avalon and Kendall Streets. The new proJect 1S apparently to
cons1st of 13 condorn1n1um un~ts wh~ch w111 replace two older motels
and a resldence. As has been the case 1n our 1mmedlate
ne1ghborhood, I am very conf1dent that the new project wlll be
another blg improvement to the "North Beach" area.
above, I urge your Board
If you have any quest10ns
me at 727/442-4306. Thank
Respn~~..o/'
JOHN~' W~LF
to approve the
concern1ng th1S
you.
In V1ew of the
proposed condominlum_
letter, please contact
50334000 WPD
NOV Ll 2004
PLANNING & rJEVELOPMENT
SERVICES
CITY OF CLEAqWATER
November 1, 2004
ORIGINAL
Community Development Board
City of Clearwater,
100 S Osceola Street,
Clearwater, Flonda
Dear Board Members,
Ambience on White Sands -16 Kendall St, 15 Avalon St & 17 Avalon St
Please consider my thought when you are making a deCISion on this project.
lawn a motel on Clearwater Beach on 16 Cambna Street.
With the 3 new hotels/condo projects that are coming up I feel the smaller,
older motels are gOing to be out of business and under tremendous pressure.
Also to add to It the storms like Jeanne make It very dIfficult to survIve In a
1920's motel that's why I feel that condos on the beach and waterfront are
Ideal solutions so we keep the tounsm With the new Hotel-condo projects and
a fine Influx of people In the condo market for a booming economy on our
beach.
I like the multIple terraces on the east Side of the bUilding. The deSign IS
extremely classy from the West and East SIde. ThiS 13-unit project IS a small
complex and haVing seen the design Will really bnng back to life the Avalon
block.
I highly support the 6-7 story projects as opposed to hlgh-nse of 15 floors
and more. ThiS beach IS well over due for an uplift.
Please approve thiS project and give the beach community a much-needed uplift.
Thank you
,-
i'
p ~(C~~~~ If[) 11\ :
NOV 4 2004 1SI1
PLANNING & f)EVELOPMENT
SERVICES
CITY OF CLEARWATER
ORIGINAL
November 2,2004
CommunIty Development Board
CIty of Clearwater
100 S Osceola Street
Clearwater, FL
Dear Board Members,
I am wntlng this letter In regards to the project "Ambiance on White Sands"
16 Kendall Street
15 Avalon Street
17 Avalon Street
I, Paul VonFeldt, am the current owner of 61 0 Mandalay, Clearwater Beach Our
area IS In need of change, and I think this would be a great asset As a bUSiness
owner, bringing new home owners to the area Will only prove beneficial, not only
for myself but other owners as well
The current bUIldings are old, and very outdated I believe Clearwater Beach
needs a younger look, with more updated bUildings The nicer we make the
bUildings, In return, the better our surrounding community Will be
As for the deSigns, I really appreciate the 6-7 story bUildings They seem to have
a sense of archItectural deSIgn that everyone WIll appreciate
I would ask that you would approve of the current plans for these exceptional
condos, and bnng new life to our North Beach
~
-
NOV 4 2004
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES
CITY OF CLEARWATER
ORIGINAL
October 31,2004
Community Development Board
City of Clearwater
100 S Osceola Street
Clearwater, FL
Dear Board Members,
Re "AmbIance on White Sands" 16 Kendall Street, 15 & 17 Avalon Street
I am wntlng this letter to let you know I support this project The eXlstmg
bUildings are old and need major Improvement This project would help us to
"Improve" the eXlstmg area I have property at 693 Bay Esplanade, and I believe
our area could use more projects like this
the board to allow this project
r '-1
[) ~~~~~~~\!
~I
,
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES
CITY OF CLEARWATER
ORIGINAL
October 29th, 2004
Community Development Board
City of Clearwater,
100 S Osceola Street,
Clearwater, Florida
Dear Board Members,
- PROJECT NAME: Ambience on White Sands -16 Kendall St. 15 Avalon
8t & 17 Avalon 8t
I own property on 14 Somerset St, Clearwater Beach. North Clearwater
Beach needs uplifting. I am a Business Owner and bring with me several
new prospects.
Before you make a decision on the project on Kendall and Avalon Street I
- would like you to give my thoughts some consideration.
All the private motel guests park on the city parking lot. Tourist and
Citizens of Clearwater should be using the city parking lot. I like the fact
that thiS condo project has all its parking underneath the building freeing up
about 15 -20 spaces for people like us who want to enjoy the beach WIth our
guests and relatives. Sometimes the motel guests have even more than one
_ car due to the number of guests per suite.
I like these smaller 6-7 story buildings. It keeps the integrity of the beach. I
do not want Clearwater Beach turning out like Miami with 25-30 story
buildings. I have seen the building designs and I think it looks fantastic.
I request the board approve the project.
R~;;~~
Gary Shelton
p ~(C~~W[E fO-' 1
NOV _ 4 2004 iiJ) I
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES
CITY OF CLEARWATER
", : 1 1 . d ' 'II. f
...;: ....... l! f' j ~ :. r I l F
a191 :10 ...0 ZO ^OJ"l
ORIGINAL
r-,' ovember 2. 2004
. Cl)nmmmty De"\eJopment Board
Cl tv of Clearwater
iOO S Osceola Sttcet
ClearwJter fL
Gar\> Roberts
223 \Nmdward Pa:ssafc
Clearwater FL 33767
Dear Board Members,
RE Am bIem.e on \\ lme ~and:, - 16 KcnJdll St ] 5 A val on St & I 7 A valoll S t
I would like to bong to your notlCt: the folio', mg
1he thre<.' eXI:,tmg propertIes are extremely old and could be a hazJId to the
commum~ if a malDr hUl11cane were to come our \Va)
2 It \\ auld uplift the entire block and ad10uung areas wHh II 13-umt condo prolect
hke AmbIence
3 The d\...slgn I have '5et'fi JS not blocky' dild I cll1l1lds me ot the beach de\ elopment In
Naples and Sara'iuta It looks very cJa.,~y upscale and dl'itJDgulshable 11: follo\,"
"Beach by De"lgn" and the CIty "hould encouragt" more projects like tiu'! one
4 It \\.Ouid Im,rease the propnt)' ta.x base
5 It ,...ould be a substal1ualtmprovemem fVT 11l1medlate area, the COIUnmnlty and the
heach o\'~ra11
I o.....n property at The Surf::'lde, I i Idle Wlid ~treet Ueanvater Beacl1 I have seen
Clearwater Beach and the slo". paced developments for man} years I am extremely
happy that finally my neighb01hood l') begmrllng to look good \vlth the developments that
are happerung In Korth Clearwater Beach
I strongly urge the board to approve the project and to encourage Developer's who are
Wllhng to do smaller proJecb
Respectfully
G~~
(Jan ROberts
o ~(C~~W~ -0"' 1
NOV .4 2004 l0 !
PLANNING & rJEVELOPMENT
SERVICES
CITY OF CLEARWATER
, "
ORIGINAL
October 31,2004
Community Development Board
City of Clearwater
100 S Osceola Street
Clearwater, FL
Dear Board Members,
This letter IS regarding the project on the North End of Clearwater Beach,
"Ambiance on White Sands", 16 Kendall Street, 15 & 17 Avalon Street After I
reviewed the design, I think It has a nice layout and would create the right look
for the area I am a neighbor to the project at 699 Bay Esplanade, and I think
bnnglng In new faces and home owners IS Just what Clearwater Beach needs
I request the board to approve of this project
Thank you for your time and effort,
Michael Parks
.441~ ~
o ~~~~W~ /IrQ 1\ II
-1 NOV 4 2004 lSJ I
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES
CITY OF CLE/\,RWATFR
ORIGINAL
November 3,2004
Community Development Board
Clearwater, Flonda
Dear Community Development Board Member.
I am writing this letter to let you know that I support the Ambiance on White Sands
project m our neighborhood. I am disappointed that the staff has recommended demal of
yet another great project. This project is very nice in its design and would be a great
asset to our commumty. This area of North Beach needs to be cleaned up and this would
be a good start to that I fmd the design very appealmg WIth Its terraces and It will
replace some old buildings that have outlived theIr usefulness. Parlang on the street for
these old motels WIll now be under this beautiful buildmg The Old Flonda District has
stated that low and mid-nse condos are allowed and this project certainly falls into the
mid-rise category and should be supported by the staff. These smaller 6 story buildings
are a nice change from the tall towers that have and are going to be bm1t on North Beach
Thank you for your time,
N~~ ~--
Melodie Ferguson
665 Bay Esplanade #3
727-441-1475
NOV A 2004
PLANNING & rJEVELOPMEN1
SE R\lICES
CITY or CLE,\RWATER
ORIGINAL
October 31,2004
Community Development Board
City of Clearwater
100 S Osceola Street
Clearwater, FL
Dear Board Members,
Project: 16 Kendall Street, 15 Avalon Street, & 17 Avalon Street
I am writing In response to the condo plans for the "Ambiance on WhIte Sands" I
think this a great project The condos supply their own parking which IS a definite
benefit The design has a classy look that will help update and Improve
Clearwater Beach I own property at 689 Bay Esplanade and strongly support
this project, and would ask the board to support It as well
r--
NOV 4 2004 :
i
)
PLANNING & rJEVELOPMENT I
SE RVICES
CITY OF CLE/\RWA T ER
ORIGINAL
11 ~03-04
Community Development Board
City of Clearwater
Dear Members,
I would like to offer my support and urge you to approve the Ambiance
on White Sands Project. I think what we have here is a very nice
looking project replacing three old existing buildmgs. These old
existing bUildings should have been replaced years ago. It is only now
that development is taking place and we should be grateful for this
economic "window of opportunity" and that It is happening. Can you
Imagine Clearwater and Clearwater Beach and what It would look like
in a few years if this development boom was not happening?
Development on Clearwater Beach is finally spilling over to downtown
but If development gets to difficult due to uncooperativeness of the
city it may go away. I do not think anybody wants that to happen.
You have here a very nice looking project reasonable in its scope and
design. It apparently is actually going to free up some city parking
that for years has been taken up by motel guest.
I like the JMC and large condo hotel projects that are go1Og to be
happening but the smaller projects like this one are also important
because they add an option to high rise hvmg. I do not like
townhomes or the Brightwater look which is also dangerous to children
and adults (mark my words here Just like the recent Clearwater school
bus tragedy on Mc Mullen~Booth Rd) due to the backout parking
situation that has been created.
Again, I ask you to approve this nice looking beach project and
continue the improvement of Clearwater Beach.
Smcerely,
~~---
Robert Pennock
665 Bay Esplanade # 3
Clearwater, Florida 33767
(727) 441~1475
If 0 ~~~~'0l~ In'
l
I
PLANNING & DCVELOPMENT
SERVICES
CITY OF CLEARWATER
tJOV Q:3 04 06:40p
Jagad'~h JhunJhunwala
419-535-8~"'C:;
ORIGINAL
November 3,2004
Cotmmmity Development Board
City of Clearwater,
100 S Osceola Street,
Clemwater, Florida
PROJEer : Ambiance OD White San:ds -16 Kendall St. IS Avalon St & 17
Avalon St.
Dear Board Members,
As. an owner of a property on 14 Somerset 5t,. Clearwater Beach,. I would like to
express my feelings regarding the above proj ect, which has been proposed rOT
development next to my property.
There are several advantages to this projeCt.
1) The design of this project suggests that completed structure will be simply
beautiful from the architecturaJ point of view.
2) When completed, with The Chalet: on The White Sands ( on 14 Somerset St ) it
would certainly help beautify the SUIlounding area.
3) The relatively smaller buildings seem to be more likely to enhance the overall
ambiance of the beach rather thaD 1al1. skyscrapers
4) Designed padcing spaces underneath the condominium building would save,
rather valuable spaces in the City Parking Jot ( which are being currently used by
the gusts residing in the motds h This would free up those spaces in the city
parking for the friends and relatives of residents as well as visiting tourists.
On the other band , the existing motels are ~ unfortunately, rather old and could
poosibly pose a haurd in the wake of major bunicanes in the future..
I hope that the board members would take into acCOtmt the above points and would
approve the above project.
p.l
Sincerely,
?x~ "~4~cu/
Pratap ~'~
14 Somerset SL Unit 6 A
Clearwater Beach
Florida 33767
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES
ClTY OF CLS\RWATER
Mlr~EY COHN, KATE LAVANCH 2S2-~'4-51SS
fl. 1
ORIGINAL
November 1, 2004
Community Development Board
City of Clearwater
100 S Osceola Street
Clearwater. Flonda
Dear Board Members:
PROJECT NAME: Ambiance on White Sands - 16 Kendall St, 15 Avalon Sf & 17
Avalon St
We would like to express our support for the above project. We are purchasing
property on 14 Somerset St, Crearwater Beach. While we rove the area and are
excited to be homeowners in North Clearwater Beach, we do feel that there is
much that can be done to support Clearwater Beach in reaching Its potential,
both economically and aesthetcally. Economically, the proposed project will
generate more tax revenues for the CITy as well as encourage further upgrade
and investment In the area Aesthetically, a good number of properties in this
area have falren into dIsrepair and look "run-down". We suspect that they also
may be hazards In hurrrcane conditions any worse than those we've just
experienced This project would make needed Improvements in this block.
We've chosen to purchase in Clearwater Beach m lieu of other areas because
we very much appreciate the smaller scare. limrted development on the
beachfront. We feel that huge. high-rise projects are not appropriate and detract
from the beach's natural beauty. The proposed project is of moderate SIze, Will
proVide its own parking (thus freeing up more public spaces In the lot in front now
being used by eXisting proprtles). and Will create a very attractive budding as the
backdrop for the public parking area and the beach. We also understand that the
developers plan to spruce up the public parking area and provide mce
landscaping to further enhance the area.
In cfOSlng, we request that the board approve the proposed project Thank you
for your conslderatlo
o ~(C~~~~ rnD-~ l'
NOV -4 2Illl4 [01
PLANNING & oeVELOPMENT
SERVICES
CITY or CLEARWATER