The URL can be used to link to this page

FLD2004-04026 " - ~ ~~~llLrwater PlanrnngDepaM1entO RIG I N A L _ r -_ ~'" 100 South Myrtle Avenue --.=-;:;-~~ Clearwater, Florida 33756 - ~-...-.,~ Telephone 727.562-4567 Fax 727-562-4865 :::0 SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATIT 11m ! " ~ ?'\'< T 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLlCA nON Including , ; co 'filed, 2) stapled ant;! 3) told&d SENs of site plans -, -< S'J5MIT APpLICATION FEE $ ,- NOTE 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLANS SETS) CASE #: DATE RECEIVED RECEIVED BY (staff Imtlals) ATLAS PAGE # ZONING DISTRICT LAND USE CLASSIFICATION SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES NORTH SOUTH WEST - EAST FLEXffiLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION COInpl:"ehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (RevJsed 10-1 Q.. 2003) -PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- u.se"ddltlonalsh=.",,=~sMy \ -,r.:"=' ~!C'\NT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION. (Section 4-202.A) - A\w...,~a.V"- Dr. #: lOO Uh.u-kesl'\ WI S3\B'8 PHONE NUMBER 77.1 {, { t. q 2.1 Uz 5"21 g't'l' ert:E ~ l~~ ~~""_C~J..'TNAME ~oJ~ P.....p.......hes I~G. vl,:).,....I'\lG ADDRESS t'\ 1 ~ tJJ 2..4 l'1, 0 R lV~V"WOOJ. }..J fA I _ ~,')~9'S:$S N1\ f t:kt"~e. ~Jl)e.~t, Q" It>\~ J'tft' ~<l.lt.tflp.~ev (Mus! ",ctud.. All owl'l&l1 a 1191~ ""\II" deed - P orlglnel "ogrnrtul1l(a) on page 6) FAX NUMBER "" ::'''' ::o-v OWNER(S) ':: -.,\ - '.if,ME(S) \..!JA rAI!.J\lG ADDRESS' FAX NUMBER E-MAIL ADD~ESS PHONE NUMBER _ '. ,:vSt:R :! PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION~ F:so B",'1 u.JG\1~t",; A~J.,..~ STREET ADDRESS 01 subjgct !>l18 ":;' . ::: ~S-:Q OT10N -=- f.,~::'c'- N,JivlBER (d noll,atOO A8I11tPI6llS~ oote!he JOClwon ollhl!l doclJmllll1'n 1Illl51JbmrttaJ) of Q.o ,E.{. :>L<,cCEL SIZE . Co (., Ac. ) 2 g ,"10 4:.~r- (acn,15 "qua nl f~et) I'!> r"~~C'4 ~ (~ ~te{ OC,f,~ '-=-: ::':'"3=0 -..IS<;; AND SIZE \ \ {~U moo r of dwelling UOIIS hotm roorM or Square looteQ<! oj non ",s,d9llbl1l usa) T~{: l " ~ ~-e.. 2 "'S~qrPTION OF AEQUEST(S) c;ee ?tttc.\.Lk 4d r ettOe-?-t~ ';naCll sm.&!$ aM be SQecl1l(: wMn klenuMr/o !he rSOUBa, (HlcludB all requGst&d code d~1atlons d a reduction In requlroo oumOar o! ~ ~ .","'9 :;jlI1lCeS, sP"clflc USB, II!C ) Page 1 of 7 - Fle:O;lble Development Application' CompT!lhanslve Inllll Redevelopment PrOjoct- City of Clel;lf'litller ALMJNAR DESCRJPTION OF REQUESTS ORIGINAL · Approval of Mixed Use Development · Approval of 13 Multi-family residential umts and 6 condommlUm hotel UI{F g l IE · Approval of a bulldlllg height of 49 feet above FEMA · Front pavement setback reductIOn to loadll1g zone of 6 03 feet mmnTIum PAGE 02 ORIGINAL -=--=-'::2 - -I'S APPl leA liON I NVOL VE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT AIGHT~ {TDfl}, A P~IOUSL Y APPAOV ED PLANNE D UNIT ~ 0:' :: -:' ,"'!VENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTl FI ED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO {If Y(J9., attach EI coPy of tha applicable _:; _" t; -0 - __u_ -- -- -- - - ----__ _ __ __ _______________ __ __ C_ PROOF OF OWNERSHIP (Section 4~202_A) /" 2,~8MI T A COpy OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POlICY, DEED TO THE P AOPEATY OR SIGN AFFI DAVIT A ITESTING OWNERSHIP (sea :::r~~ ~~ :J WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS (Section 3-913.A) ':'--:;->k!e complete (Gsponses to the 61;<;; (6) GENERAL APPLICASILlTY CRITERIA - Explain .l12It. eaCh criteria Is aChlev6d In detail -- - - ~"'( S~~ cG>"el:JpfTl6nt of the land will be In ham'lOllY wfth the seals, bulk coverage, deMlty s.nd'character of adjacent propar\Jas In , ~ ~ - - -~nd I oJ. l \.:. ' f ~ ( 1. ~ ~ __ ,::;. (i.vi,or....; <f,)~ ""'I !t't~tl""" I we r"'~ ~.... ht. ft \:tv s ~,\.....i" ~ "S'~...r l S ""ff :o~~,.\t>~~ ~u,. 45'1~~T.} ~attt<<; Llk;i:J~~vf~l71 f.\.~ cJvlv\>w"'"1-s, _~~J:l'" \4DW ~k ~l'aJp 4IAic~...."'zt~ UJltk \(\9~'~\..t#W. ~~,~~~~:~~~:T'"t "" ~' ~ ~'ooit ~mprl'M -:rom '"~." ~d b""~"'k '(tJSignlfk:MtlY ~t"~;. .']:~ ".:: L,~: ~:.;-.: : .~ ,~.~, --.. ~-cpossd development 1'1111 not adversely Rffect the hlJstth Of salely or persons rooldlng or working In the neighborhood of the proposed ~::e l1l!: (UV"~ (vi-" tlo.v"P tMtll\lW\I'LoW\ aVl.,(, lllJ( iotA, 'o""'r~l-ItJ, cuo....t-- - / d,(>5 "1.""r-J.. l6 po/ll V\J...... "" ~4l\. t..... I ('leo. HL .c> ""l vi r"4..... ___1-. -->e :J'OoooOO d&ielopmant IS doolgtled 10 mlnlmlZ6 traffic ponges1'?n 4- rr. .11 -r~ Jl.Ji,'e.\nf'^'\9IAo\ 'PH~UA...~S 1,,="''' \~l""t-IC. p-t.v. fV'<:'("IIO';~ v<;;~ I)\~ Is J"$\1~P'.J tp .....,....i......J?'" t,.....ff,(.. ro"'"rs-t'4"'-. tin tVYo F~IL. a;t 'H.J 1 '1iUIV'..J I \t.S5 kf-i~" "'~...-e 1.l.lkAl9S~J "YC~ e~?I,,,,t(v f T">1Ol plCpo$OO devalopmant Ie consistent WIth the commumty cl1aracler olltla Immediate vicinity of the percel proposed for development -- :s.~_~ '~~f ~1.~:: ':~~~~ :~~'j --_~~~....J:?.....(,6 ~V' ~\cl c:. ~o(/o . ~ I. k.-\:n liIo.(avu #00.. ~ ~ "~~Ak~ f Tn'" deSign olltle proposoo development mlnlmlzoo adverse effsets Incloong visual, acoustlc and olfactory and hours of oparallOlllmpad6, ~ ad",... .....- ~ :\~~: -t l ~ =: ~:~~'J~~.~.!~t;".. ;, ~:; ; "'I~ ~::r 0:, D.~O tW~ ~f. :::;cC'v'd~ complete responses to ttJe ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE INFILl REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA (as applicablej-- Explal/1 :O2_~ /?-:;ch crltena IS achieved In dat611 -~e development or redevelopment 01 the parcel prop::lsad for developmenl13 olt1el'WlSEl Impractical without deviations trom the U36, Intan31ty a'1d development slandarcla "i--\u JpVl~+I~( "'"trot V'i'<\Vlt~'"\..Q., vJ.\lC~ USE>. ~;. ___L~\.-~ v~-C- lA" +. \ IIIA;t... #\. ~ -tl> f v Q In J. i, _,.----:..,~ '^ \ UY\.IAf;lu," ~ ....'-\) l~. H~s.J .elf cr 'A t -to ~OU\!. 1/,,>;., J,. ~.. . PElge 2 of 7 - FleXible Development Application ComprehenSlvalnll1l Redevelopment Projocl- City ot Clearwater OklGJNAL ,~ 03 - Ilfi :<: -"'e development of the parcel proposed for developmanl: as a comprehensIVe Infllll'9dtJve/opment project Of resldeflbalmfilJ prOJOCt wjJf not -"'~. ':? '\-9 fair market value of abvlting propert~ (Include the e)UstmlJ value of the site and the proposocl value of lhe ~Ie WIth lhe ~ ~-:- r- ~...,~ ) T~. ~~~~~,1I ~w ,^"-,,co tL.. < l.........i\.. . oj! tl".. ..~... .. -..i. hl..." ". ~ly~~~~~~~ :;; - h _se>s '\I1thln lhe oomprehanBIva Infill radevGlopm&nf profect ar(l otherwise perrml1l1d In the CIty of Clearwater ~:t C l:::ci...\ ,...'" ...., .l.."....S / ... V" P ..II...... tU I.... -\t.. C~-f~ 4 The uses or mIx of usa within the comprehooslve 11'11111 redevelopment Pt'Ojact are compobble with adsacent land IJS8S ~ ~v.r..c..v~~ ~ ~V'L f'e..ci~ k"tL..~(j---,LJ~/ - __---1';;...\.~.).. ~t.J t~~,..-t '0'-' "^. .....l'l....\ } .....tl i..O\4~\~ w i~'4I~s M.A\~ IISf' \-= .5' Suitable sites tor dev&loprTllml or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses WIthin the compfsh8nslve !nM red8Vslopmoot project are nol ':!'h9rw1Sf,8vwlable In tl'je City of C/98lW8t9(, I I f J i:1 -.l' \ O~v ~~ DII"'t. OTcOVt'S., I Polokl,.\....'1\tt. A,lo(# '-'\\, SI r~ I,. vkl"tve 1 :"<::<11:0;" ... ~ a '}Jff>.......tov sit.... -.h.... t~f~ ~I..-.".J ....sP. 6 The d&veIopmant of the parcel proposed for OOvelopment as a eomprehen:lMl mllll redevelopment project Will upgTBde the Immediate VIcinIty ':'~ +he parc~ PfOWS8d for deveIopmBqt. ( . -L +. I' l I . - __'....I-.d--'" 1 ~ t'a Id r......\ pJ.. P"'tO':.,.., I re c.. ". e't \ I a fA 1l1.... ~ eo M. .<\ I ~ ( I 11<5 \.0. '" &.4.. ;.. " t.Do r "''''1- ._ .~___j:...s,,;A.. ~ ;~\~l\ J...t.+"1\.J,. LLoIoar~~t.V'*'"I-"''''\ 4.....~l-...i1J..... /r~val"'''~ _ \ft).l(( V M It'~ i t. b a 1I'~ ~ " L4. ~{'l' '"lilt. ~. ,. The d8Slgn of the propooed comprahenslva InflU redevelopmen1 project creates Ii fob and function that enhances the communi!)' character of '''? f'1"ledlfite Vlcmlty of the parcel proposed for development and the: CIty of Cl9arwaIe/ as a whols -- - ~ ~~o/..c."\t/"Ir.< 6L~... o!.L L,l th.ci~'" ..,......).. Q~~v" rla.""'~j C'tt....~ L.tJfV't. uc:eJ : VI t.::~-lt.~.~':r ~~~:r;r" .....I .l.e t..~\ .......( .." ......{1 ,......,-e- ::' FleJdblllty In regard to 101 width required setbacks, height and off-street parking are Justified by the beMflIA to community character and the --0;:- at$ VIcinity of the parcel proposed tor development and the City of CI(I<UWa!er as a whole ~Vi.Tl. t'e}Ll~~ 4,\' ~tt,1J l~ ('" u,tY~l\ w';\~ II,..,. clv..lA\.~ ~ ~ . :::-::{ :t,,~"~ ck:: ~~'tf1rr, ~~t~ ,1..J \to', \~, ..., f"'>>" .J.. ~::-e::::'~aie ofl'.strHl partl;lng m the ImmlldJale VlCllllty according to the shared parking formula In DivisIon 14 of Article 3 will be avallabla to - :: ~--S~"s$t par1<.l1\gln tha lmmedlat& vicinIty 01 parcel proposed for dav910pment &\l~ V:::4I"~(t''''''.'''''''&''.....t.. 4v..J.. L\At:o~k..i ~&.IIV.J.. fG\....~ .-r.... i'!lL(CC>I.....-....~t~ Ik L.q..... -QIA('(os.rA ,.~. e~ or;; it(il, ~~ ~. .1... f~~ is t~'f,~J\r.J , - -,~ - -:~ - ' ,;' 2.11 )'.11 dl"gs complies with the Tourist District or Downtown DIsU1C1 design guidelines In Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable) ~S2 ":"0;:,,,"::,9 sheets as necessary ~J,~ ~o~rL~ U';l"f(., TOoW1)t D,d.-,cot VCltt.l\V'''~.j;, ~J .:t.l\ e{eoc.-tt".Js I:lf __bL.~ \.'1 O.~t1(A · '5e'~ow:~" J !.....ctvs~ fA~;:~t",*,1;~~~rf~ prof\ (t.; _____ .:..-::.... ,..._~,-~~"c. 1... 'I L o..p~ Ca I -L lAA.c>...L+~"" J..t.....ll c::l.....e -..0 .. ('lt~.~h.ifi4~J~~, Page 3 of 7 - Flexible Development ApplIcation. ComprehensIVe Inflll Redevelopment PrOlect- City of Clearwater OR 31NAL Ftt.0E E" SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMeNTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) / :: ~- ::::: PYJ SEAL!:::O SURVEY (Including legal deoonpbon of property) - One original and 14 copl&$, ~/ -'-:;E:E SURVEY {Including eJdsllnljl1l'OO$ on :ilte and wllhln 25' of the adjacent $lie, by spsdes, size (DBH 4" or grGater), Md locatloo, Including dnp lines and IndlCl'ltmg Irees to be removed) - pIBsS8 d6S/gn around t/18 axlsffng trees; -;;/ i..OCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY, ::- ~ ":' ' C:G :JEMANO STUDY In coojllflcllon with a requeello make delitatlons to the parkIng standards (I e Reduce number of spaces) Prior 10 - <.' - . ;T'" Ml of thle appIlcaUon, the methodology 01 such study &haJI be approvad by the Community Development Coordinator and shaU be In 2~CO"dancll wrth accepted traffic erl.[fn89nng princIPles The findlngs of the ltudy will be used In determining whether or not deviations to the :arklng standards are approved, U.s..cA. c .ole.. If"e~v\""'~s ~ GRADING PLAN, es applicable, -;;Il:~ELLMINARY PLAT, as /'f(lulrad (Note BUIlding permits IMII nol be lSSLJ8d untll eVidence of F8COrdlng II final plat IS pruvtdad), -'\.:::."t t'V'\...\~ ':-::-=-v ::;"'" ~'::CORDED PLAT, as appIlCllble, _ - $'-E DA'T' A TABlE for exl&lIng, reqUIred, and proposed developmenl, In 'MItI:9nltabular lorm _'-:: c..8J1d area In square leel and IlCre8, ________ Number of EXISTING dwellIng units, /' Number of PROPOSED dwellIng units, 3'Qss floor area cl$VOted to each use; ::-~., -':: spacgs' total number, pres&rrted In tabular form wrth the number of required spaces, - ,,::' :, ::~VEd area. Including all paved parking spaces and driveways, exprassoo In square foot and perc91l1age 01 the paved vehlCuIa~ area. S ;:r,; ::!I'Q sp<<:!l;M;l of all landscap9 mat9rlal. Q;f,clal recoo1s book and page numbers of all 9:.dSUng utlllty ea89n'1ent, 3>.l ding and structure tlltlghts, Impermeable sur1ace raUn (I S R), and Floor area ratio (F A R ) lor all nonr&9ldMtlaJ uses __..,,t.t.. --.:' --"" ~ --!~ -"'='" -...... ....J....:. ~ ....ti4 F _ SITE PLAN SUBMITtAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) -./ s T~ PLAN with the fOIlowrrrg Informatton (not to excBed 24" )I 36"), j' :'-~"s!o'lS, ~- ,;--...-::-..... -.- ./ ': .; - ,. 19 ::?" SCalB (minimum scale one Inch equals 50 fool). and date prepar8d, _,=",,: cr map, 'rdax sheet re1araraclng Individual shoots lnctuded In pacIutge. Foetpnnl and SIze 01 all EXISTING buildings and structures, Footprint ancIslze of all PROPOSED buIldings and structures, Include floor plates on multl-story buildings .01 -eoLlrad setbacks, AI' <m'e::lng and pl'Op()OOd points of access. All reQuired slghl IF'IllJIgl8s, lC9nllflcatlan of snvlronmerllBlIy unIque areas, such as walerool.JlllOO, wetlands, lree masses, and speclmoo trOOS,lneJudlng descrlpllon and location ot unooF'SlOry, ground cover vegetation and wlldUfe habitats, eIC' Location of all publlt and pr1va.te 9a$&ment!l, Locabon of alf stroot rights-of-way wlltltn and adjaeool to the e1l6, locatlon of exlstJng publIc and prtvate utilities. Indudlng fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manl'\oles and 11ft stations, gaB <L"IC water lines, C Note' Por SectIon 3.911, all utllltles shall belocalOOll'9focatEld underground) A' '~+',l'Ig &paces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular uso araa&, Includlng hal'ldlcappocl GpaCaS, ::;g!)lctlon by shalflTlg or crosshatching of all reqUIred parlong lot Imanor landscaped aroos, Locatlon of aU solId was1e containers rlK:}'CUng or trash handling araas and outsld9 mechanical $qlllpm$nt QIl(t a[1 requIted screening {per Section 3-201 (0)(1) and Index '7011, locatlon of alllandscaJ'l" malenal, locabon of all JunsdlclJonallJoos adjacent 10 wetlanc;t$. Locallon of all ensile and 01fslle storm-waler management IBCllltles, ~ -:::::l*''1 of all 0lJtcl00( Itgntl ng fixturee, and _-:X'a"on of all e,.jstlng and proposed llldewalke _.J~ ~ _/.: -'~ -.." v --- ./ :::C:R ::-::;VELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE. provide the following additlonal InfOrmation on SIte plan - I ~ e"s-foot conlours or spot elevatJoos on slle. Of site 6'levatlons If requIred to evaluale the proposed S101'mwalar management: for lhe parcel; All open ~ce areas, Location of eU earth or waler retelnlnQ walls> 31ld Qarth bGrms; Lot lines and building lines (dimenSIOned), Slfeals and dnves (dtmensloned), Bulldmg and structural setbacks (dimensioned) 5' v c"J'a'ovel't1angs, .-0--2 ,~ l~m'o'Y, prepared by a .cerlJfied arboFlSr, of all trees 8"' OBH or gI!;later, reflecting SIze, cunopy (dFlp lInes) alld condluon 01 such traoo , , P1fE OKIGINAL .... ~- L..\NDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) LANDSCAPE PLAN All elCi$tjng and proposed structures Names of abutbng streets, Drainage and reten1lon areas including swalH, sldG slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation end dimet1slons 01 all required penm8t8t landscape buffers, S'ghl VISIbility Inangles, '> ~g;:tlorl and tjlm$l'l8lons of all paJkJng ar88S Including land&caplng rslands and curblng, ::--c;:---:--".:;: a"ti "l'lqulred parking S~M: :::' 'Si'-!; rIees on-8l1e and Immediately adjacent to the sits, by species, size and locatIOns, Includlng drlpllne (as !ndlcat8d 00 "~C;L'lred U'ee sliNey), , Plant achedule wlth 8 "'8)' (symbol or label) Indicating rna SIze:, doocnpbon, specJfIeatIons and quantities of all exlsllng and proposed 18nd5eape matenals, Including botanical and commOt'1I'1amB6, Location, size, and quantltlea of all 8XIsbng and propos9d landscape matElflals, rndlCeted by,q key relallng 10 the plant schedule, TypICal p18f\lrng datalls for tr98S, palms. sh~ and ground COver plants rncludlng II'l&truc1iOO9, sod mrxes, backfrlllng, mulctung and "'~~~"lv9 measures, - :-: :f;;,d.scapl'lg areas hatched and/or shBded and lab8led and Inter10r land6Cap6 covwage, expressing In bolh squam feet and pe"cenmge COV8Illd, CondItIoN; of a previous devalopm9l'l1 approval (13 9 condibons rmposed by th9 Communl1y Development Board). I mgatlon I'lOtE!S REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to a.cala (8 }it X 11), In c:oIor ';:-:'.GAT10N PlAN (f9qutrecl tor Level Two and Three apphcabons) COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as appIlcabI$ L -"- L j-- , _L J -I -I- c.;' STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City o' Clearwa~r Dellingn Critl!!na Manuel and f -ZC'-7.: f~ 21) -' '" STOAMWATER PlAN IncludIng me follOwing rQqultQments EJ<l$tmg topogMtlhy ~Mdln9 SO '$(11 beyOnd ~ property tines. Propoeed grading Includlng finished fIoot $1eva1lon& 01 all wucturea, AI! adjacent slr99ls and munr[;lpal storm systems. ~r,:.,C$'XI etormwater detention/retention area IndLK1lng top 01 bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure. :; -;;'~ '?t,;," ca'culatlons for atlenualion and water quality. ;: ~~:: _ -2 ,;:< ;;-''Jida reglsterlJd ProlBsslonal Englm~8r on aD plans and caJcula.tIons '" -~ , "7 COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST RORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMO) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval rs requrred prior to roouatlOO of City Building Permrt), If applICable: COPY OF STATE AND COUNTY STOAMWATEA SYSTEM TIE-IN PERMIT APPliCATIONS. If apptlc8.b1e 1- i. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMmAL REQUIREMENTS' (Section 4-202..A.23) ReqUlrsd In Iha 5ventlhe application loclud$$ a development Mler$ design standards are In Issue (e 9 Tour1Gt and Downtown Dr5trrcts) or as part 0.1 e. ComprehenGlve Infln R~vstopment Project Of a Aeslderrballnflll PrOJ8d: c ~ LJr \lG ELEV A TlON DRAWINGS - all &Idoo of all buildings Including halght dlm$tlSlon&, ootorG and matorlals -:; "':::~JCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS -four ,.Ides 01 building whhcolors and matarlall;; to scale (8)il X 11) (b/ai;k andvmlte and color rendenng, rl pOS$,l)Ie) all r9qulred 3rGNAGE: (DivisIon 19. SIGNS I Section 3-1806) : ' ::::,~:'3-ING freestanding. and attached signs, Provide pholographs and dlmensrons (area, h81ghl ate ), mdlcate whether they WIll 00 removed or ...,;: ~=r2. ~ (j All PROPOSED froostandlng and attached srgns, P!'OVIde d9ta11& Including location. slze, hEllght, colors. matGnals and draINing, freeslandlng SIgnS sha/llnclude the street addresa (numeralS) "::0"'" '.<'~e-~s ve Srgn Program application, as applicable (separate applrcatlOl1 and lee required) : ~- :)^- ":;~?2e !:"QP~"al (6 y. X 11) (color), If subl'flIttlng Comprehensive Sign Program ~Ilcatlon f>age 5017 - Flexible D&V8lopment AppHcabon - Compreh5nsrve lnflll Redevelopment ProJecI- Crty 01 Cl5arwater K. TRAFRC IMPACT SfUDY' (Section 4.202.A.13 and 4-801.C) o R uill~A L Pi t2j! 1 CJ Include M t&qVln;od If proposed dwafopfflllnt WIn (1091*0'. the ac~toble level of 8srvlt:s tor 'ony n .ldwaY.ll9 "lOpl9d In tha ComI)f'llhQr'JSlv~ p u- Tr1p gonarallon Ilhall be baaed on tho most I'8Ctltll ltdillon Of the Institute 01 Tr8118po~ Er.gJ/1Cl'I,rll Trip Ge .e~1 M~nlJal Aele. to $.'.0;1'",[, ~ ,,~ C of the Communlfy Dev8lopment cocs. for QIlCllt)lIOns 10 thl9 l'eqlllr1lmenl L. SIGNATURE: 1 I t, the undtmtlgned acknowledge lho:t aJI reprNOrllallons made In thll appll<latloo aru !rue and aecurale to tI1e b6llt of my kllOWl8dge 8nd author! Ify fepfesentat1ve6 to viall and photograrJtl ltl. prtlpBny OOBC m hie application State of W~scons1n, County of Waukesha w 1fI'Mt: e~ fLOAl1M. ';6l;JHTY (If" FINELlAl 'lC-\'....... Swom In and sui :lCrtbed bllfore. me ttus QL..;L. ca\' ), .3\)'('..e.~ A 0 20.!r:1 to m& 2lt,cJr:, , , - who JIl QlGroOI"l(l11y knov.TiJ r,a~ a... Pt'OdUC9d Identification KOJ..9_ I -f. Nctarypubllo. My commlialon expire I Pag(l 6 01 7 - Flexible DeveIooment Aoollcatrl'ln _ l'nm""'>',...n..Io,,,, l-rul 'h"^. ._._____. ,,__. _ . _. _._. ~ ~ , - " :J.. A \ "\4 ~V\CU- 28 J"....~ '2.004- Yv\.r,. M L ~~ ~ \ V\.'\J..s Se<'\ lh" P\t;4.Io\"tV- Cit.t of C\o"'-....~.J.tV"" RE' FLD 2004.. o~ 02.(, {j 5" 0 eo...~r.u "1 9 \ tJ~ ' Dec^J.. '(. p v-.. r~"+\~ So ~A. ~ t"'e v t s-eJ.. ~ $ U (,..." d~. \ V'(!i'{/ ~Gt\~ 1 ""... c" ""'..... ..:h of or.~ t!... .fir ,1- ..,... "- .,.{! J"".. '2<>11. W e. \.v... \I e. I 0 LV eO"' Il c::l 1- k.a. ~ ~ '" fi ,i1- '1 10 l3 V'P os J.o 11 C ~!i I & SV l-te .s ?\.,,~ v-eotvc-e.J.. tk p-..,...\c:..I~ 16 i)\.1e. It?ue.\ ~......J... ""~'" ~ ~t J. "'c~ J. t~ v.J l-tA t ~ h -e I'~{ J,", [" 0.1-: f.tJ a. '^" "Ii re t " e s"\ .q ,,' ,,~'" "- F I2IWl. 0.. .. $' L...""", I'" t L... .e.\~V~+l'O"'\.~ Wp ~v-e.. r~J..lIe'l!cA. tk..a.. c-u.r" c-....ts. C(...,of o\v t~} -Ptl"'CvYl. 3 t. o~ !:\ ",.,c 1l! fo"\. c""''''- tl 1 h.c::i VoCL \f'e 1 lie: ~ ~ \ ~c.t of tlu- -to "" + IV'~ '" LI ilct i I LV... ~ ",-elt.. t:)., (s 0 1'V\.A.k. c: oil" re ch 0 ~> 0 V" '\ "'l S &A:J e..v-eal "6 "e.. -t ,...... f'.,."""," tko... 0 'l J"", "- .,... r ....t b D iL... e... 7 I ... .,ev; i 'J>~ ......._r..Z "v\...~1fetvof"le' W,,- t.. r "" tL, , ~ V'O!" l ~ i 0"" WI u t -" .,;, tl. 'f "or' o..ff 11'''''''' J ~j V1.t::'I!re {t ~(~ G'((Q-\;t A ....clt...+~c.t ORIGINAL t' / . // . " l.. A ~ VV\ ~ lo'\ c;u.- 28 JIII'\t. 2004- Y0w- . rv')'f.-t. ~ 1. ",-~\J...s s.e t.'\ It'" p\(.( I'U\' t I/'" Cit"{ of C~9Q.."'''''J.W R f:' F LI'> 2004.. 0 ~ 02(, '3 5" 0 eo...l UJ "1 9 \ v.,( . De C^J ~ f' ~ r-e//-h~~ "'-lI\!; r-e v I S'€J.. t~ ~ u l,~ l~ \ V'~ (t ~ct\ ~ ~ 4l lit" C cl vv, V'o'\.e...d-~ f V"601V\ 14 +wS'T WE'1t ~ oe J", '"t~ '2.001. We ~v"e. IO~N"lla i~ &.t'1..S~/ -t l3 ~'S-J.9"'C~SJ & ~Vl-te..s t\. '"\ '^ V"e J. vcoe.J.. f k p........ \t:. I'~ 16 l) lo1 e It? v'e. \ ~...... J... \.A"'.1Ie. V'tJ-.JC\?J. t~ V.JI.tj(~ h~'iiAf l~ t.,o.l~. Wa. 1M W re t " est J! 'I' .... l.,,, t. F 121hlA jH SO t...",,,, I... tL... .e.t~Vl7\.-+l'Ol.\.~ Wt- ~v-c.. r-eJve.~d-.. tk..a.. c.1J.....f.:, c.v't~ C(vtO< o\.v t~" F,rotoN'\. 3 tt. o~ a. \-'\ I. 1 e ~ ~...O\. t{ 1 kc::i v-e... V'elv'~ tkt. \~l:.i of t~ .e.~-t!l""e- L,v LlJi, lUe.. ~ "-.Clt. " \ ~ 0 I'IA.A.-k c: 0\1"" re c:h 0 lo'l.> 0 v- ~ 5<'\ S ~ e..~ "6 "e.. -t ,-... f'".""", tk.... 0" J"", "- v-e r .".t h 0 it.,. e... 7 ,;' ..ev; i '/\.."",_J p\.v(:.~1pc.tvof"le' w... Lu r ~ tL, I !e ~ c) i ~ l 0,"" \N\ e e. t ~ w 'd.~ ~o cJr 0. ff' vtJt.I~ I. C:;fV1.C~re. {t ~~ Gd(o,t A V"ckd-~c.t ~ . l'~ . ;-~If1. t ~ r ~~:"c'''f ,rwa er :.~~~ ~~~ F'lanfllng Department 100 South Myrtia Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone' 727-562-4567 Fax. 727-562-4865 CASE #: DATE RECEIVED RECEIVED BY (staff Initials) ATLAS PAGE # ZONING DISTRICT LAND USE CLASSIFICATION SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES NORTH SOUTH WEST EAST ;:) SUBMIT QI'I1G1NAL SIGNEO AND NOTARIZED APPLICATlQN ::: ~"2 \~lT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLlCA liON Including '; co aled. 2) stapled and 3) foldeo s&ts of site plaM S'JBMIT APpLICATION FEE $ -, -< ,. NOTE 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLANS SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comp.-ehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (RevJsed 10-10-2003) -PLEASE TYPE OR PRJNT- l1$e"ddltlonalshcctusnoce.sary ;,r:-? _'oCf\NT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION (SectIon 4-202 A) c ~'" _ CM.n NAME ~ oJ Ie P ...... ~....-t l e5 I ~4 - A \ If,.\ t "'- a.. LI" - \~'~'L '\G ADDRESS N l4 vJ 2.4 \~ 6 g lv~V'wooA Dr. it lOC. lLhJ:. tesll\ W r S 3, \ B g _ ~,')vro:-::S$ ~A PHONE NUMBER 71..7 -4" I 2.. q t I O>::~ N~ FAX NUMBER U 1. 52:1.. gcr. 'i 1 I ;;~::;;~o-v OWNEA(S) 'D",.l'..J.e e.rD.,~...t\ v ( !l-\~ 1 J~fr ~CHtJIr\~l,ev eV""C2 ~ ,c9~~ (Must mdude ALL <JW!1&f'll al USled on me d&ed - pn:Md'" orlglnal ongnmorn(a) on POll" 6) ~~ -_ " - 'vAME(S) "-lld r _' ~'W~E:P PHONE NUMBER \ \ ~f\U\lG ADDRESS' E-M<\IL ADDRESS FAX NUMBER 3 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION' \? 5" 0 'B",~ UJOt, r----B \v; A-i+o.. d, ,. J. STREET ADDRESS 01 subjacl site -=2' _ -::>=S~D,t>Tl0N ':;:: "::'-:;;;:=:J ,-,S:: AND SIZE [If nol hated AlIr& plll8Sp nOle !he locatIon of th"" docu m em In the &lblfutlal) ]j ~O\.\ Q tl . t,C Ac. ) 2 g ,'10-t~r- (8CI>3& squa I'G lem) ('!> r~~04.c~ ~ to. hote\ Ol.tts T~I' \~ ~ M\~ OS~ ~P\-;:::Ir:;=~ NJVi8~R ::: ~,PCEL SIZE (nvm be r 01 dwsllln 9 UnllS hDte1 room ~ or squafS lOOlS9'l 01 non "'Bl denl,s,1 USII) '2 ::Sc;"'iPTION OF REQUE:ST(S) q;ee ?tfft'lLh -Rd r e"'Oe"7-t~ AMell sh"~,, anctbe Sl<ClC111C wnen IdllnuMrlo lhlllElOlII!61 (",,,Iud.. "lllllQuesled code d""'allons do reduC110n In reQulroCl numlXl' of ""''<'~\l ~pace~. specifiC use, IIlC ) Page 1 017- Fle,;tble Development Appllcalion - Compmhenswe Inllll Redevelopment Pro16CI- City 01 Clearvmler 4 ALMINAR DESCRIPTION OF REQUESTS · Approvdl of Mixed Use Development · Approval of 13 Multi-family reSidential umts and 6 condommmm hotel Ul1lts · Approval of a bUlldmg height of 49 feet above FEMA · Front pavement setback reduction to loadmg zone of 6 OJ feet mlllllnum PAGE 02 :.c':':2 ---l'S APPLICATION I NVOLVEO THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (mR), A p~rOUSL Y APPROVED PLANNED UNIT ~::- :: _:;;<"\'.EI':"', OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES -'- NO {If yeg, attach a coPy of the applicable -,- ~..... ,~\ - -.;c- - -- - --- ---~~--~ - ------~------- ... .....;OJ' ::: ?ROOF OF OWNERSHIP (Section 4-202 A) "'1,/' 3....>3MIT A COpy OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLlCY, DEW TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATIESTING OWNERSHIP (see ::p~~ G) :J WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS (Section 3-91J.A) ':'--.:-v1ce complete r,;t;poosas to the 81l!:. {5} GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain l1m eaCh criteria Is achieved rn detail - -:: ('x",,~-: 0~"e>I'Jpmani of the land '011I11 be In harmony with the scale bulk, covemg\l, density and characl8f of adjacent propertIes In ,- -. - ~-.a-s'-+ 1. ~ [ I f.ll t .J- .-42 _ .l ___ -=::::-'A f ;',,,;'Ol{"- <to}\.......1 ~",ito,,,\, we r~ v~ kt. ~ \'u \ \l=- s I"~ \0'\; ,. C'lIlMJ \r--~ 'So \'11 .$1Q..ff :0 >>\VVl~ J \"oJi~ \'v,. 45'1\,... ~t, I J.a\tt~~ vk,ls Q.~.dc:.I~ a.. "tJ. c.t 11"\111> w""1'" _~=~j: 1~ l-1oW \,k ~"qJe dlAi t:~lI'dlc\-~ UJ~~ V\~\11,~t#W, ; --.,,: \::--ooo~~d Clevelopm6f1t WIll not hlndor Of discoumg6 tl'\a appropnata development and we of adjacent land and bUildings or sIgnIficantly ~o~- "'" 'slue ""'o0oi ...u h ',ff; :i; ~.J, : I b Ie! ~t~~~. :]:~"l~" ,,':!,t~:V' ;:.; .:: .~ ,,1~: · ~.~ , -~" :,<;,pcsec! development WIll not adversely aHect the hDalth or safely or persons re.sld!ng or wol1;.lng !n the neighborhood of the propoSed :~"" "'(tA.At r WIt" (L.l1.., ~ f"p 1M. H\ I ""'-lwA I r.:t...,;' "U ~ iA., l. 0..,.,. f CI ~ t j, CHI' (... J.f" 5 l' ~~J. 1.. ro/b Vi J"".. '" '7411.. t '"" I (.1('''' H L ~ 10'\ V I ~'1. ~ 1-, - ~D :]~oosoo ~1opm9nt IS doolgned 10 mlnlmlze traffic .fM99till9n t rr. Jl ::'~"e..\Df'^'\lH'\o\ .,l!lo'I.pvP....~'S 1~~5 vD't"'\-lC- T'""1.tA PV't.Vl<lUj. VC;;'O 0.~ I' ~1o'Ir'.J -tP. 1A""lo1j,"J~. t,....f(.c. rOk1.e.d'/ll"" _ HI) tvn F~rl.. ~tuJ~ "~\ltil'.J I \t.S$ kr-i~'" l1~~ /.( I SLN9;~ ~G~~~ :3 "'""E> proposed developmentls conslstoot WIth the commumty charact6l' of !he Immediate vicinIty of the parcel proposed for development ===-:~:_~ \~;\~;:;" &:r ,::~ <::~~<::1~ ~~~~~:i "vc.J.e2L 5 T'1e deSign of ltIe proposed deve10pmGnT minimiZes advarse effects, Including VIsual, acoustic and olfactory and houls of operatlOf1lmpa.cte., '0 ada,'" "opem~ ~ :\~~: t l ~ =: ~--~:~:;'~';lt: ": :. l:;~:; {; ~l~ ~::c 0:'1 D.LIC'3> 0 t.f~ ~ ~ f. :o-~v'd$ complete rMponsBs 10 tt16 ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE INFILl REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA (as applicable) - Explam ~.?_{;: e.a::h crltena IS achieved In delall ~~e development or redev~opmen\ ot 111& parcel propoeed for developmentls 01l161Wl86 Impractical without deviations Irom the use, intenSity a"'o d6velopmsnt standarda ,,\ V Jp y'J~+I~' "'\.V'll v@."v~ ~;'1I ~. 1}J, t l(pJ (] ie. \:> ___j~~'.!.Y~ Vl.\J.~lJC- tA,,+. \ 1/";1.. ~J 1'l> f/JV'd l/ ulR. , '" '^ \ Ilkl.. ue. 'l;, ........\) l~. -..--->-- n \J Ffpjlf!J -t~ F:ou,4 -ettl r.... t I/"'c" ,.J.e~.. PagEl 2 01 7 - FleXIble Development Apphc;atlon . ComprGhenslve IflliIl Redevelopment Projecl- City of Clearwater ~v PAGE 03 .2 .....9 development of IhEI parcel proposed lor development as a compreheru:Jve InfI!I redevelopment projecl or resKJenballflfill prOject will not -,,~ <~9 '''9 faIr market value of abutting properties (Include the 6XIs11ng value of tho Sltll and the proposed value 01 the SIte wllh the --:""':' ~-,:"7s) lk.. ~~~=--~,1I ::,^lILlo\.U tL.... (. ~...........~ .0f2~ ",...e..... D\ ~ f'1.Lv-,.,ee, o. J:r ~~~~t+ ~_ \,",~t" - h.... _ o$S 'vlthln the comprehenalvelnflU radevGlopmenf project ere ottmfWlStt permrtled In the CIty of Clearwater __--.:::\,'?- v Sf> '$ I \Ao-\'t. \ ...v..J. f't" 1 J..h1 toea ~) Pt.. Vcr- p e V ~'. ttJ I~ ~ C~.tl nof C {PCW"~ 4 The usee or mile of use within the comprehensive Inflll redevelopment ptoJect are compabble with 8dJacent land US8S '(tu, !>;-~v~.g.~~ ~ ;:1..L t'::~ l-tAt- r.l.t~t:r n.---Y_'<!::.)" V o,..i __ ~ , } ..... \ ~ \ ~ w ii I '" .. oS . liS" .~ 5 ...e.. a. "..J r 'P ....., ov '5 The developmel'lt 01 the parwl proposed for development as a comprehensIVe Infrll radBvelopment projact Will upgrade the Immedlate vk:lnlfy 0' the pa~ for deveIopm.:f; .,(,. . ~ t I ~ l . ___J.I. C'L2l..t.". pJ. P^ 1~, tee-re.... 11lt^ Il1.....AO... I~l;) 1I<S ""1AJ...~C.""d~ _j:~---k. ~ j... ~t1. J...t. t"l \.."l I.UI Q J ~t u.........,,"" 1~U."J.u1..,tv..... -riA lit Fl.r1 I -~~-, ... J. r . . . VJ I 7he design of the propoged oomprehen$lve InfllJ redevelopment project creates a f and function that snhe:nces the community characfer of '''", m",ed1a18 Vlcmlly of the parcel proposed for development and tile CIty of Cl9arWal:er as a whole ,,~J'_ ~~ J"C:\-~~( O~.A~L. L.1 ~jt&.. ..,.~A Q~r~ rk"''''~i ~tt...~ .()J~ !)~ ~v1 t :cr.~ ,~<:r C~~J.:!t:;f" "..J .I... t...\ ......( ~".....n ''''''''f-L- S r-'lexlblllty In regard to 101 width requIred setbacks, height and off-street parkIng are Justlfltld by the benaflts to community eha.raetel and the - ~'X ate Ylcl.,1ty of the parcel proposed for deVelQpment and the City of Cleanvatet aa a whole ~VlC .,..e't~~ 4~' h",lJ tl7 ('~ l~\,.r, et-'t:.~\ W.l'~ 11.00.. C~VI\..:fw. ~ ~ . ~:-!~:t,,-"1~S r~::~~~n,~~~,.J~ "",\.t,,,, 1""""'.1. ~ ,\::e::: ~ate ltf-slreet parJIlng In the Immediate VlClnlly according to the shared parking formula In D1v1s1oo 14 of Artlcle 3 'Nill be available to ,- ':;;; ;:- $~"~$t parkIng In tho Immediate vicinity 01 parcel proposed lor development &\l1 ~ V"..t.~t....e..-...j", D.lA,( l&A4~~.i ~lJ'~ f"".....L~ .-.....e... ACe. <<>1."..'\ ... ~+...J I"'" 120 IA -Q.... (' (ot:..J. ,. A~. t"'\ 5: itti!:, ~.. ., ,1'-.. JO NI'~ t , ~ ~'t vU'~"..l , ~ ~~~ _':"" '.~ )' 2;1, )'.1 Cl"gs compiles with tho Tourist District or Downtown Dlsll1C1 design guidelInes In Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable) ~s-e "",",=-~'a;9 sheets as necessary. _kWJj~ t~~r'l~ L.l:l1{., TO\W1)t D,4-,coT VVtv\V'''~J.. e..J ~t\ etl!'W1t'.Js "f _~~L~ l.'1 Oe~'1V\ · '59~~N~'-'1 t~dos~ favf~\~tll"WJl.'K"'~ff~ f'vof~ ft., _~ _ _-::_~ ~.i)..'l..~ I.LA 'SLo...J''O ~ L.....L ",,^e."Lt~... lA.t;l\ A.....e ~(\ .~..~~_~f-(4l!'J~y.," Page 3 017 - Flexible Development Application. ComprehensIVe Inllll Redevelopment PrOj8Ct- Clfy 01 Clearwater PAGE 04 \ , f I E" SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) / :: --' ::::' f. v') SEALED SURVEY (IncludIng legal d6scnpbon of property) - Ono orlglnalllnd 14 copl~, -;:/ -;:;-i::E SURVEY (Including exlsting tl'00$ on SIte and within 25' 01 the adjac9flt site, by species 8170 (OBH 4" or greater), and location, 1!''1c!udlng dnp Imes and ll'\d~aflng tress to be removed) - p188SfJ design around the existing tfe8!r, -sI :"OCATION MAP OF THE PFlOPERTY, :c ~ '::' ',i\'G. 'JEMAND STUDY In COI1JunCIlOfl with a requesl to make d&vIatlol'l$ 10 tha parking standards (I 8 Reduce number of spac&s) Prior to -'" = ~::- ,e1 of this appIlcaUon, Ihe m(JthodoJogy 01 such study shall be Ilpproved by the CommunIty Development Coordinator and shall be In Il':co"dance wrth accepted traffle en.!;fnesnn!;t princIPles. Th8 fmdlngs of the ltudy will be used In determining whether or not cklvIat!ons 10 the :;arf.df)Q standards are approved, U,..o4.. c tel ~ V' e.~" ~ II'Q~S: c{' GRADING PLAN, as applicable, ~~!:LI.M1NiRY PLAT, as f9(l:ulred (Note BUilding permits will nol be lSS11ed llntll evIdenoo 01 recording 3 final pial IS provtded), -...,~ ~ V'li>\...\~ -:'::~v '2"" ~=COqDED PLAT, as appllCllble; :~~ S~~ DATA TABlE for exlBllng, roqulmd, and proposlKl development. In wrltl9nItabular form _'<" \...8f1d area In square f8flt and acntS, __ Nvmber of EXISTING dwttIIlng units. v Numbaraf PROPOSED dwelling units. 3t"Q3s ~r area dO\l(lled to each l)l;IG, :c0'- - -~ Sf)&OIS total number, prssented In tabular form with the number" af required spaces, - ':"~~ ::;ve:l El."M.. ,ncludlng all pavad pal'ldng spaces and drlv8ways, expressed In squElfe foel and percenlage of the paved vehJCular area, S;;-;: ~,,>j e.~Ie& of all landSCape rnat9rlal, OiIClal records bOOk and page numbel'6 of all existing utility easement, 3u...:ilng and structure he1ghls, Impermeable surface mtlo (I SA), and Aoor area raho (F A R ) for all nonresll:lentlal uses --- " .-J~ -X -~ v' -~ -_!~ _v - ~ -~ ~ _1.r ....1:_ ~ .J:V1 F. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) -..I S T<.:: PLAN with '\tIelollowmg information (not 10 exc98d 24" x 36"); 1\ :! -~"".slor,s " -,.-- ;--:-J". v ,::," ",' lS ca- ~ca e (minImum scale Dnfllnch equals 50 fOOl), and dale prep8fecl, _?CI';' cr map, :1'19X sheet relerenclng Individual sheets Indud<<lln packBg8. Footpnnt and SIze 01 all EXISTING bulldln{J$ and structures, Footpnnt and Size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures, Include floor plaIes on multl.story buildIngs .0.' "eQllred setbacks, AI' oaxIs1ng and proposed pornlS of access, All requjred sight toongles, IC9ntiflcatlOfl of environmentally Uf1lqUB amas, such as walercou~oo. weUandll, lrB9 maSS89, and speclmoo trees, IncludIng descr1pllon and loeatJon Of understory, 91'0111"1(I caver vegetabon and wildllf8 habitats. ete Locallon 01 all public and prIvato aasernent$, Location of ufl5treel rights-of-way wttI'ltn and adjaeoot to the Site, location of exlsUng plbltc and private ullllties, Including nle hydrants, slorm and sanitary saWQr 111'198, manl'loles and 11ft statIons, gas a"c water llnss; (0 Note Par Section 3-911 J 811 utI11118s shall be 1oca19dlmlacatBd unclergt"Ol.lnd) /,,' ,~q,+" ng: $pace$, drlvoways, loading areas and vehicular use aroot:, Including handicapped spaces, :9Plctlon by shadlfl1J or crosshatching of all reqUIred parking lot Intenor Iandscapgd areas, Location of all solid waste containers rBCYCllng or trash handling areas and outslda mechanical equlpmetJl an(t all reql,jlrOO s<::reenfng (per SectlOtl 3-201(0)(1) and Index #70ll, t.ocabon 01 aI1landacape matenal, locabon of all junsdlcttonallm6S adjacent 10 wetlarK:la, Locatlon of all onslta and offslt9 storm.wat8f management facilities, _ ,::-,::>.'1'J'1 01 all outdOOr lIgl'rt1 ng fixtures, and _<xa"cn of oJ'o)(!sbng and propooed sidewalks /" -- ,/ _ ::-C:R :;:O:VELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following ac:ldltlooallnlonnation on SIte plan _:L '~r C"e.1oo~ contours Of spot elevabor1s on slle, or-;slta elevaUons rf I'ltqulrad to owluate the proposed eton"I'Iwaler managGlTlent for the parcel; An open space aMas, Location of all ewth 01 water retammg _119 al'1d Qartn OOrm$, Lot lines and buildIng Ilnes (dlmensIOl1oo), Simms and anves (dlmensloned), BUilding and slruclural satbacks (dlm9nsloned) S -, C't.""ll overhangs, .",? '~";'l'o"Y praparecl by a 'cerufied arbonsr, ot alllfoos S" D6H or grealel', reflectmg SIze, canopy (anp hnes) and condition at such Ireas Page 4 of 7 - FleXIble Developmenl Appllcebon - ComprehensIVe Inlill Redevelopment Projec1- City 01 Clearwater PAGE 05 -- -~ LANDSCAPING PlAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) ...ANDSCAPE PLAN All a~tll'lg and proposed structures Names of abutbng 81r99ls, Drainage and retanbon areas including SWaiM, side slopes and bottom elevations, Delineation and dimensions of all required p9nm919r landscape buffers, S'ght VlSlbrllty lnangles; ':'?' -"ctJol'l and dimensions of all parking 8T8aS Includln!;lla.nd&ce.plng ISlands and curbing, -::";:-'--9-: a'l':' "equlred parking spaces, :::"" -!; :'e~ on-site and Immediately adjacent to the srte, by spacles, size and locations, lncludlng drlpllne (as Indicated on r,,'1 c!lred trea s UlVey). Plan! act\adule wllh a key (symbot or Jabal) Indlcallng 1M size, doocnpbon, Sj)OCJfleatlontl and quantlb6S of all ex!sllng and proposed landscape matenals, Including botanical a.nd OOMmon names. Location, size and qvantltlea of all elOstrng and propos8d landscapa materials, mdrcat8d by a key rglallng to thE! plant schedUle, TyplClll p1anbng datll.lls for trees, palms. shrubs and ground cover plants Including IrlStruetlons. soli mlXBS, backfilhng, mulChing and ~':-'~'1Ve measures, ~-':: ':: r;.,~C;.cOlplng areas I'latefloo flndIor shaded and labeled and InlellOf Ia.!'ld6oo.pEl r::OVBJagB, expressing In ooth square feet and pe:centage COV8nld, CondItions of a prevtous development approval (e g condibons Imposed by the Communrty Development Board), lmgatlotl notes REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to !ICiIle (9 l-lz X 11), II'l eoIor '::-:>:.GATION PLAN (reqUired fer Level TWo and Three apphcabons) CCMP~EHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable L _L ..L -".~ , _L , .J -I- ,_ STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Design Critl!!nB Manual and /" -?:C'2,A.~1) v STOAIliWATER PLAN Inctudl"9 the lolIowIng requlramants' ExIstIng topography extending 50 loot beyond all propMy IIMil, Propo$Eld grading InclUdh'\g It nI shad floor slevatlOl"l$ 01 all structures, Allad)ac8nl slr&8ls and mW1I!;1pol storm systems, ~r"::l~s'Xl8tonTlwat:er datentlon/f9t9nUon area Including top 01 bank, toe of slope and Outlet oontroI structure, ::'::"- '<'.10: ce'culatlons for att6fluobon and water quality. ':: ::~ ~ _ -.. -::: F<,:,ida r6glstered Professional Engineer on all p11lOS and C3k;u4a1lons ....L _L , / jj CQPYOF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FlORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval IS reqUired pr10f to ISIJI.IaJ'lCEl of City ~lkll"g Pannlt), II applICable COpy OF STATE AND COUNTY STORMWATER SYSTEM TlE-IN PERMIT APPliCATIONS, If apptlcabltl /- '- i. BUILDING E:LEVATlON PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS' (Section 4-202.A.23) A8qun8d In the event the application Includes a development 'ilItlerf) deslgn standard& are In Issue (e g Tourist and Downtown Dlstncts) or as pari of a Comprehefl6.lve Inflll Red$vQ/opment Proj8Ct or 8 ~denbal Inflll Ptoj8C1 [; _' L "JII\JG ElEV AllON DRAWINGS - all sides of all buIldings Including holght dimensions, colors and matorlals fO -=:~ ...ICED BUilDING ELEV A nONS - four slde& 01 building wlth colors and matarlal$ 10 scale (8 * X 11) (black and white and color rendoong, If pOSSIble) as r9qwr8d ., S!G NAGE: (Division 19. SIG NS I Section 3-1806) j:, I ::::,~'S-ING freestanding and attached signs, PlUVlde photographs and dimenSions (area, h81ght. ate), IndIcate whether they WIll be removed or "'~ .'8'..........E, ~ o All PROPOSEO Ireeslandmg and attached Slgn9. Provlde deteJl$lnchJdlng 1octrtI0I'l, slze, height, colors, matonals and draVotng: lraaEltEll'1dll'1g SignS l;nalllnclude the street address (numeralS) ('c:-.....:'."~@rs ve SIgn Program application, as applicable (ssparale apphcallon and le9 required) : .,,- _~ y <;. ,;;~"'g,," ::"Q,oc;sl (6 ~ X 11) (color), If subrnrtllng Compr9h9nslv8 Sign Program awIlcatloo Page 5 of 7 - Flexible Development ApplICation - Comprehen5IVtl Infll1 Aedevejopment ProJect- City of Clearwater PAGE 02/04 K. TItAFRC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 Rnd 4~8D1,C) l , Q Include all req....rod 1/ proposad development WIn ~e ltle ltCO.ptabl8 leva! of 'Qt\lIC8 for ~rtIy n idway 88 t I IopIOd In rile Comptahar.slve P fj_ 'l"rtp 'ii-ratlon IIMU b6 baued on 1M rY\OSt recruu 8dl1ron of !he Institute of Tran9porfatl9l1 I.::r.gl1ljH1"1I Trip Ge "l'll'llll MiIlnval ReI$. to S ,<,;\",1, ~ ,~ C Of th& Communi!}' Dev8lopment eocs. for QlfCgPlIOns 10 thl9 rec,Ull1lmllflt L. SrGNATURE- 1 I I Itte underSIgned acknowledge th8t all repreaentatkms made In thlll application are true and GCcurate to lhe b66t of my kOOl'WhKfge IUld authorl ITy repr898nlatlvee to 'IIl81t Imd photogra,:lh the PropMy d$Bcrlb d lfl hr. appllcQlIon State of W~scons~n, County of Waukesha w tffA'I"[ Of rLGFIIDA. :;CtJHTY II F FIN[Ll68 '1 <'-1....... Swom 10 and lIul lCr1bed OlllorB. me IhfS ~_ G3.l' ), _l\)~e. ~ A 0 20~ to me ""de ~ , - ~, whO liQlGnlonnl1y known)~,a", a" Slgnat PI'Oduced tdel'ltlt1catlon or ritpl'8$$nlallWl ,z~} --f. Notary public, My comml88lon 8:r!prre I Page 6 01 7 - FIe~e Developmenl Application - Comprehensive InfiH Aedevllloprnenl "ro/ect- CII', of CleanvalBf ALMINAR ESTATE VILLAS AND SUITES PRlV A TE MARINA Decade Properties Development June 2004 , ' ALMINAR ESTATE VILLAS & SUITES MARINA CLEARWATER BEACH . .'p "';':'1 . . o Resort enclave with two and three directional views, intriguing loggia pool with views to North and South Intercoastal. o Club, concierge, sun terrace, loggia, roof terrace and marina features. o Dramatic floating penthouse with complete open . VIews. o Estate landscaping and shoreline walk. ~~ ",!.-', ~~~ " . ' I ' AI 'fi) ~ ~ ~ I I L> ~> ,~-"'" ~ lA ~ .~!: 1t.~ I ~ ;N m (j) "" ~ --- ..-----..j ., .... '" ~ d > .. 1lI I , \. t ' J L I ,I I i ,t'" / W I I ;1 I , I' t I ----.. I r ~ " , , I' , ' ;' 't ti,- '-. "'dl '--f I' ,I .J - of ~~q 1 '" ~ I I ,I , I , I I ,I ij I r ,v " II 4~~ i ~ ....., , , , Ii H I II " I' I ! r ~ l'll I: a I I I .... (f) e<( ~ e<( .... 6 - l- e<( ~ () ~ - w n () u BUILDING AREA TABULATIONS SPACES ENCLOSED BlDG TE~E TOWER> AfiEA (ef') GROe5 AFO?EA ((!R-) PAf<K1NG LEVEL 1 .3" 14,611 " LOADING ZONE I TYF'ICAL LE\lEL 2 10,6'" .3,31' TYF'ICAL LEvEL 2 9,6l2l0 .3,311 T'r"PICAL LEVEL .3 1l,210 2,2'" PENTl-lOU8E LEVEL S 11,2112) 2,6e.z> UN.ITe. fiE&IDENCE& I-lOTE:L TYF'ICAL LEvEL 2 , 2 TYPICAL LEvEL 2 2 2 TYF'ICAL. LEVEL .3 , 2 PENTl-lOUSE LEvEL 51 & 12) ~ 1& TOTAL 6UILDING: I-lOTEL 5UITES UN.lTS 1& UN.ITS TOTAL. eulLDIN6 RESIDENTIAl.. UN.IT5 ~ UN.ITS TOTAL ENCL05ED 6UILDING: A~, &1",,1 SP. TOTAl- TERRACE SUILDING AF<EA. 11,&84 SF TOTAL OCCUP.ANT LOAD. I40TEL PAfOi:K,l~ " SPACES (INCLUDING 11-lC) CCNDO PAfOi:K,lN6, 24 eFACE& (INCLUDING: 1 GUEST) ALMINAR RESIDENCES '* eulTES FLORIDA 6UILDING CODE 2/ZltDl EDITION INClUDING TI-lE FLORIDA ACCE5e161L1TY COPE NFPA 101, lIFE SAFETY CODE, 20/ZltD EDITION Ffi!IMARY CI-lAPTEFi! 30 NEW APT 6LDG:5 OCCUF.ANCY CLAe8IFICATION ENCLoeED BUILDING: AREA 'TEF'!RACE AREA TOTAL elJlLDINC:r AREA RE&IDENT1Al- I-lIGlRI6E &1,312)1 5.F 11,&84 SF 68~1 SF. APT PORTIONe - 2/ZltD SF PER PERSCN GROS& ElEV. 1m' NGYO Il (AE) ELEv. 10"" I 4"1-0 -=-' A60YE 6.4SE FLOOD ElEV. FLue. 11&'-0" OYEfO{: FiUN FOfiil: EJ...EVATORIMECI-I WITI-l TLIRIT Loa::. OCCUP.ANT lOAD . ELEvATION 1ST FLOOR. FLOOD ZCNE WILDING 1-lEfGi.fT 51 STORIES FLue ROa=.AND ELEVATOR MECI4AN1CAL LEVEL MAX. eul~lNG: I-lT 6Y CODE. 112)0' A60VE eA&e FlOOD EJ...Ev TYPE a= CON&TRLlCTIaN. ALL.OUJAelE FLOOR L.OAD, DESIGN WIND L.OADS TYPE II 6EE &TRUCTURAL. PLANe 6Y os: OL&EN 4" .A.eeOC. DETEFit'!INED 6Y Tl-IE FFiOVISIONS OF ASCE 1 (16tD6 U F6C) RJU. Y FIFO?E SPRINKlERED eLDGI. FER ec.c..NFPAI0I (W-,5) FULL Y FII"E AI-AFit'! PROTEcTED SLOG. PER SCCINFPAI"I (30-'A) UN.IT EXIT ACCE&&. TWO REMOTE: EXIT &T AIR TOlUER& AfOiS eMOKEFFi!OOF TOlUER& OFF A I I-lR FIRE RATED EGRESS CORRIDOR PER FBC 1/ZltDS5 :1 ~ .1 :J: .1 t; l( ~ If J>. -t 2 I I I I fI4" , it ,. I I I I :1 ~ .. s .... :i ~ II ~ 2 il - , I il :1 S lie ;i !:i . ~ -f 2 I 4- !! - '11 I ! 11 i~ + + + , ti 'i '. I. I I.. I.. i. il t t ~ + ... 'I In . (p .1 -f .1 J: 15 ~ II!I -f 2 ! I ! I I , , I I I I il i~ i! i~ i! i; . + t t t . t , to (; $: l I I , I " . ~ .. .-........................ F- ~---- " .' I' " , '\ ~ c.______. 9I~ ......-1. ~ I il lA C =4 m --- J;; t..)e -S~ ~ (Ja ) -- \ " t-:)c (lQ~ .::j !' ::\ '" .... I !l g' , ~ m ~ ~ , ;- " , C L W CoverS heet FLD2004-04026 850 BAYWAY BLVD Date Received: 04/27/2004 ALMINAR RESIDENCES & SUITES ZONING DISTRICT: T LAND USE: RFH ATLAS PAGE: 285B PLANNER OF RECORD: MHR , , / FLD2004-04026 850 BA YW A Y BLVD Date Received: 04/27/2004 ALMINAR RESIDENCES & SUITES ZONING DISTRICT: T LAND USE: RFH ATLAS PAGE: 285B PLANNER OF RECORD: MHR CL W CoverSheet / · ;(lllrwater -~ o~ Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone 727-562-4567 Fax 727-562-4865 ORIGINAL CASE #. DATE RECEIVED RECEIVED BY (staff Initials) ATLAS PAGE # ZONING DISTRICT LAND USE CLASSIFICATION SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES NORTH SOUTH WEST EAST o SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION o SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPliCATION mclud Ing 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans o SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ * NOTE 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION (ReVIsed 2/02/2004) ~PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION (Code Section 4-202 A) APPliCANT NAME ---.D E.CA-P E. PR.Dffi'~neS MAILING ADDRESS '240 e,A.'(S\De Q2\\IE , PHONE NUMBER 727 ' 4&, l · 2'121 DNeLoPM e=t-{T .J~ "~IEK.Ll=8ee Cl..e.A.attA$R. Betlc~ I A-" 337{,7 FAX NUMBER 2(,2. '522. gqq~ PROPERTY OWNER(S) Dt=CADe p(2.oPE;(2:ne:s (Must Include ALL owners as Ilsled on the deed - prOVide anginal slgnature(s) on page 6) AGENT NAME N / A MAiliNG ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER FAX NUMBER CElL NUMBER .,-- E-MAIL ADDRESS 8. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION. (Code Section 4-202 A) STREET ADDRESS of subJect site (5s-o &y WAY b 1 ud..- \. ~LMIl-.1A2 ~e$\Defl,c.~ 'E &<111""56 LEGAL DESCRIPTION ATfAatEO StJR.\(CY (If not Ilsled here, please note the location of thiS documenlln the submittal) ATTAC~~O 5U~vei PARCEL NUMBER PARCEL SIZE . '" A c-, '2. fJ ,eoo s~ (acres, square feet) PROPOSED USE(S) AN D SIZE(S) I 5" R-eStt>1!NCt:: g ) " Roo tt1s (,.. 00 G I NG I EJC.lS.n1J(i ~A121 N A (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonreslden\ial use) DESCRIPTION OF REQU EST(S) S [1 t ?L.J.l-.l. 0 \:: \J labPt-Ali:.t..l"T A ff {2.DVAL Fn fl. Attach sheets and be speCific when Idenllfylng the request (Include all requested code deViations, e g reducllon In reqUired number of parkmg spaces speCific use etc) lli" R5SlD8-<<:E<J, .A Wi) &; SJ I1"E5; 411 Co D 12:.. DE;ViATlON...~ 1<-FQJE~Tro Page 1 of 6 - FleXible Development AppllcatlOll- City of Clearwater DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSL Y APPROVED (CERTI FI ED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO L (If yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP (Code Section 4-202 A.5) aI SUBMIT A COpy OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 6) o WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS (Code Section 3-913.A) o Provide complete responses to the SIX (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria IS achieved, In detail The proposed development of the land Will be In harmony With the scale, bulk, coverage, denSity and character of adjacent properties In which It IS located ,Me. t U\l,...DIHC, 1S BELow \!AI? 100' I.ft. L.l ~IT AND StiLL At:~t::.lves: VAQ...\ATfH.1. HI. Roo~ MAsSI KG.. , CCmcp.ll PO PM2~ H(1 . oRN E.~ I H FAL..A DE. I l-\m2.1D\2- c.oee... So TEPE'ED ~At...E. . /2.n-Gffi I uE L.c6G ~ , ; / ~ J.t.jl) ADUW$IAN/MEDrT. C.HA~J AHO Pl<.DtJIDE.O DE:N.Srrt' {".llMPA't'IABL.e wfill Nr=l6IitS'm.<;, 2 The proposed development Will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adJacent land and bUildings or significantly Impair the value thereof TWF E~I1At-tC~O VIStlA,l.. Cot4'r~r OF' Peo?€l2:1Y J l;..HC-WSE-O ~~N(" ,.A.f../..D VISvAL (O€.IiT l,f Vm...l,.. AOD yAw€. To liac..lctBa2. R2.0f'~imi;9;. 8L-DG.I<; PLAce.O O~ nU~. FA~r 'R;l Le.J\..I)~ ~)q"RA oPal. ~PI\(E eN wesT To ~i N.i=:-I.6.~oI2$. tJl~ , 3 The proposed development Will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons reSiding or working In the neighborhood of the proposed use "lvle Sl"~ PARtl-I.K6 /.l.+-lO <;t=..cuRe 13 L OG. F'LVS Wl..blt>sLA...Pro "5Tr('e=e.\"S.cA~ A l~t> ~lG. H \2.e.,<;iDTit{TIA t.../p..u IlMoDAnoN. use Wt Ll- I IVIP'/l.CX..lE. H:eAL.m ANO SAR=r{, 4 "'rl{E(2.E '8'f it> rr,.. ~l'>tJQ t4, ~ AL. 'T{l..AfAc.. ~v 1;..(1' AND ~Ue1AecN:r~ l BY Ai .u;.ti'n 5 The proposed development IS conSistent With the comm unity character of the Immediate VICinity of the pa rcel proposed for development 'THe. MPD1T. t"NC.I...A:Jt./ BTAiE 1.l'tL..LJ... l>>A'lEll.R201JT ANO THE QUS.UTI( Of THE ~~ I ( A+-t ASS'f':TTO COMtoAlJt1\Ty C.1-\A12.ALyp.~ . i.J5C A~t> ,A.p~~ , 6 The design of the proposed development minimiZeS adverse effects, including Visual acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation Impacts, on adjacent properties TW e.. LcJ f...! eet\.l,...eO 'fJd./2K.1 N~ A.N D ~ON 'n2..DL.L.eO Ac.J! LVI N u C ,",A~,ta-PP IMPf2.0va UL$UAL JA,eUS,,(lc.. AND DPeI.2A-rIO\.4 1l:4.pAr_,c:. fVtA(U t'iA. \50 POre.. lJse OF uN\\ Ow~82.S "'\olD f...ves,s. o PrOVide complete responses to the applicable fleXibility criteria for the speCific land use as listed In each Zoning District to which the waIVer IS requested (use separate sheets as l1ecessary) - Explain how each crltena IS achieved, In detail \J.Ile,' A2E. I2.elhJESli~& 12e\-k)VAL. OF QG'" ~OH c.lal2-"'f\-\.tl(Jt;e:... A~ tLtIlDA1\ON USE- RBPL..tceP g-( IS [.Z~S Ibf!1-tcES ( ,SAc. X 30 ujAJ ANlJ Co SI1 rTES [. is Ac. )( 40 o/A]) TdrA.\... SITE c: . G' At.. '-..l 1tJ. A LOkOI2.'( e:s.\"I\-re.. CoN,CEPf 1A71'fH. It..l.llWIt..l.f'., I..l'l t1{-, IA /RALtof4.\-' DES\GK~. , Page 2 of 6 - FleXible Development Appllcatlon- City of Clearwater E STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Design Cntena Manual and 4-202 A 21) g{ STORMWATER PLAN including the following requirements EXisting topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines, Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures, All adjacent streets and mUnicipal storm systems, Proposed stormwater detenllon/retentlon area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure, Stormwater calculations for attenuation and water quality, Signature of Florida registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations o COpy OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval IS required prior to Issuance of City BUilding Permit), If applicable o COpy OF STATE AND COUNTY STORMWATER SYSTEM TIE-IN PERMIT APPLICATIONS, If applicable F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS (Code Section 4-202.A) d SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal deSCription of property) - One ongmal and 14 copies, a-' TREE SURVEY {including eXisting trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by speCies, size (DSH 4" or greater), and locallon, Including dnp lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please deSign around the eXlstmg trees, V LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY, lit PA RKING DEl'vlA NO STUDY In conJ unction Wit h a request tom ake devlat Ions to t he parking standards (Ie Reduce number of spaces) Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be In accordance W Ilh accepted traffiC engineering principles The findings of the study Will be used In determining whether or not deViations to the parking standards are approved, J rJ6 ~ GRADING PLAN, as applicable, PRELIMINARY PLAT, as reqUired (Note BUilding permits Will not be Issued until eVidence of recording a final plat IS prOVided), COpy OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable, G SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS. (Section 4-202 A) ~ SITE PLAN With the follOWing information (not to exceed 24' x 36") Q All dimensions, i/ North arrow, -----"'V Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one Inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared, ~ Location map, Index sheet referenCing indiVidual sheets Included In package Footpnnt and size of all EXISTING bUildings and structures, Footpnnt and size of all PROPOSED bUildings and structures, All reqUired setbacks, .,4. ~ ~~. ., All eXisting and proposed POI"'tS of access, ~ V-- All reqUIred Sight triangles . c:;:::;> Identification of enVIronmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including descnpllon and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and Wildlife habitats, etc, <:::::::?' Location of all public and private easements, --=- Locallon of all street nghts-of-way Within and adjacent to the Site, e::::;:::? Location of eXisting publiC and pnvate utlll\les, Includ Ing fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and 11ft stalions, gas and water lines, All parking spaces, dnveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas, DepictIOn by shading or crosshatching of all reqUired parking lot interior landscaped areas, locallon of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outSide mechanical eqUipment and all reqUired screening {per Section 3-201 (D)(I) and Index #701}, LocatIOn of all landscape material, Localion of all onSlte and off site storm-water management faCilities, Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures, and / 1_ _ t7 Location of all eXisting and proposed Sidewalks eo c C(f' ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ e ~ d SITE DATA TABLE for eXisting, reqUired and proposed development, In written/tabular form ,./ Land area In square feet and acres, J;t./ Number of EXISTING dwelling units, ~ Number of PROPOSED dwelling units, -./ Gross floor area devoted to each use, Page 3 of 6 - FleXible Development Appllcallon- City of Clearwater Q ~ Parkmg spaces total number, presented In tabular form with the number of reqUIred spaces, Total paved area, mcludlng all paved parkmg spaces and driveways, expressed In square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area, Size and species of all landscape matenal, OffiCial records book and page numbers of all eXlstmg utility easement, Buildmg and structure heights, Impermeable surface ratio (I S R ), and Floor area ratio (F A R ) for all nonreSidential uses ~.' REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 Y, X 11) and color rendering If pOSSible, o FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the followmg additional mformatlOn on site plan One-foot contours or spot elevations on Site, Off site elevations If reqUired to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel, All open space areas, Location of all earth or water retammg walls and earth berms, Lot Imes and bUilding Imes (dimensioned), Streets and drives (dimensioned), BUlldmg and structural setbacks (dimensioned), Structural overhangs, Tree Invento re ared b a "cerlified arbonst" of all trees 8" DBH or i 'ta H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS (Section 4-1102 A) LANDSCAPE PLAN All eXlstmg and proposed structures, Names of abuttmg streets, Drainage and retentIOn areas mcludmg swales, Side slopes and bottom elevations, Delineation and dimenSions of all required perimeter landscape buffers, Sight vIsibility triangles, Delineation and dimenSions of all parking areas including landscaping Islands and curbing, Proposed and reqUired parkmg spaces, EXisting trees on-site and Immediately adjacent to the Site, by species, size and locations, mcludlng drlpllne (as indicated on reqUired tree survey). Plant schedule With a key (symbol or label) Indlcatmg the Size, deSCriptIOn, speCifications and quantitieS of all eXisting and proposed landscape matenals, including botanical and common names Location, Size, and quantities of all eXisting and proposed landscape matenals, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule, Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, SOil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures Intenor landscapmg areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and mterlor landscape coverage, expresSing m both square feet and percentage covered, Condlllons of a prevIous development approval (e g conditIOns Imposed by the Community Development Board), I rngatlon notes REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 Y, X 11) (color rendering If pOSSible), e IRRIGATION PLAN (reqUired for level two and three approval), q; COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM applicalion, as applicable BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS (Section 4~202 A.23) ReqUired In the event the application Includes a development where deSign standards are In Issue (e g Tounst and Downtown Districts) or as part of a ComprehenSive Infill Redevelopment PrOject or a Resldentlallnfill Project 01 BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all Sides of all bUildings Includmg height dimenSions colors and materials q./ REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four Sides of bUilding With colors and matenals to scale (8 Y, X 11) (black and white and color rendering, If pOSSible) as reqUired I. J SIGNAGE (DiVISion 19 SIGNS I Section 3-1806) N/A o All EXISTING freestandmg and attached Signs, Provide photographs and dimenSions (area, height, etc ), indicate whether they Will be removed or to remain o All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs, PrOVide details including locallon, Size, height, colors, matenals and draWing, freestanding signs shall Include the street address (numerals) i:l ComprehenSive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee reqUired) o Reduced Slgnage proposal (8 Y, X 11) (color), If submitting ComprehenSive Sign Program application Page 4 of 6 - Flex Ible Development Appllcat lon- City of Clearw at er 04/26/2004 08 07 9419574151 GILLETT ASSOC PAGE 03 K. TRAFFiC IMPACT STUDY: fSoctlon 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) o inclut;l!l as requlrea" ptopoeecl d&velopml!lnt .,.,111 degrade Itle .hx;;l.'Ptabl$l.....1 of MlrvTCe for un; fO' dW6)' <15 at ,pted In iii,! Compml'lihne,ll/& PIlIl'I Trip genarallOrt shall be based on (he mosl t8C8nt edition Qf tl'tt InstItute of TrenspOlUltlon El'I(Ilnlen Trip Gen' lei UanullQ Reier 10 :,ec;tlon 4.801 C o11he CommunllV Devetopm.nl Code fOf ltXC8ptlOnlllo this rl/!cql,ll""me-nl L. SIGNATURE~ --------., 1 ITA TE OF FLORluA, t; OUNTV 01' !"INELLAS _ r~d I u.tl,!l:-rlb8C1 b~ ,In:! me Ihlt -2&_ day or OJC?Q!l' A 0 ~ ~ to me -----aAdJor by "_____. '11'I0 " l:rersonall~ ~)..n h<l3 ploduood _____ _~___,~~, III enttfioatlc n N~D~ My wmmlulon QXO-:((~ { /.:l4,L'22 , I ,~ ~'~A"":"~'~ ?k ...;; a !f'::: v,;t. ~'tl 41r;.C\, ... CAROLYN J SHEETS MY COMMISSION * DO 063011 EXPIRES November N 2005 Bondad Thru Nolary PI.bI1o uoo:,,,,me.. " ,I ~ I ;i 1. . '~ .., I ~ " , l I r.... j j ~ ~ ~ ~ \ l ~ I , 'Il~:rd II ~ I l i I ; . . ~g6 5 of 6 - FleXible 0ev&lOpn'l8nl Applrcallon- Clly 01 ell;! lIwa\er 84/25/2804 08 87 94195741"1. GILLETT ASSOC PAGE 04 AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT' (NamaB nf All property ownlill'O. 0" deed - please P~INT full flame,) That (I ..mtwe Brll) lhe 0.....n8r(8) arld rBCora lllle holder(s) of the followIng: described p~rty (,Kl.jllJ3\ or general 'Jl;lIllon) 2 That tl1ls property cnnetltUles Ihe properly for which 11 request fnr I (detctlbe request) '" J That Ih e u nde r signed I hill/it (lvll) appo I nled IloItd (dnesJdl;l) II PpOll't' i-- 18 (his/their) agent(liI) to Ixecute liIny petltlol'ls or other docuO'l.mt Mcessary to af'lecl suCh pl'!Lhon 4 ThaI !hls affldavll has been executed to Induce the City of CltillIlWlIter FlorldQ to conaldsr and ad OfIlhe abnv. lIlIicrlbed property Prooeny ~,llciltlon !'nd the I "!VIlllr authorlZ~.\I CIty 5 Thill site VISits 10 the pfOperty il~ n00&8Ury by City '1lprssllnlatlv8fl Irl onterto proOlll&t. "PrQerltatlvol> to "'~lllInd phDtograph Ihe properly dllllcrlh<td In ltus appllClllfon 6 Tn iii t (I /we), the un d Grl: ''il ned a u!horlt)' II. f."Y certify that It.t tc I'8g 0 log IS tru e a rnf 00 i~~_ Property Ovmer COUNTY OF PINELLAS STATE OF FLORIDA, mfllha.ulldarslgned an cfflce uJy oornr1'l .Icrled by thelswa of the Slale 0( Florida, on Ihls ::<@ d:il)' of ,.:(Cf)t./- pc r n l~ I1PPe.1 _ ~ who l'llIVI, 11~9n firs~or" ....o?0io........__...,...._ {J~~~i < O~P"""' ~~ :~(I ; '1 ,j- - d' l' , f,' 'I l, l I J f'-" 1 ~ l,.-' 1'1 ... .f :1 -,- < , ) l' ,^ - I ' , , M)' Comml~:;IOI1 Expires If /:;;L'-f ( 0 ~ l~t"ll',~ ~~~~l "1i..i:""--: ~;ijl:'~ ~ *!: =:; :'I;"~ ~ !!!~ "?;P.f"f,;~~' CAROl. YN J SHEETS ~ , MY COMMISSION # DO 063011 EXPIRES NovembGr 24, 2005 Bcrded Thru NoIaJy PIlbIIe Underwrllefs S IPl'annJllg Dep~r1 "'<lrr!lAppllcaHo" t;:)1TIl31c!all8lopm'lll revle.... \fI~'f)le eJevlllopmSflt i!ppllcal/on 200;) doc ~ , > I " , , ; ~l _ I,' Ploil96 of 6 - Fl9Mlble DevelOpmtnt .PIlho;;lItlon- ClI)' (If Cl41rWiller 03/:::0/2E104 17' 0:. 941 g22~,!.?1- r .;.....L,;:iII_1 rr.t..1.::JJ. GILLETT ASSOC PAGE Nil E!91 0<1 Gle4 ~ CHART ~IOUSf SCffEDUI.E A. t.- --- F.;m;~,.,t ~ ~ 1:2-ilil3172 r 0_ 1....- Co.. of ~~m""7:~_ ra~'II_~~ I ~ ) 42098'!1'9'~1~" A ..,.......~,;;r\!iC ~~/l] JEFFREV KEIERLESER \f11~J I nqu Irillll 9 t.lluld bill Oitllited ta RICHARD ~. GEORGES, P.A. 3656 1sr AVENUE NO~tH sr. PETERSBURG, ~L. 337t3 81::1-:321-4420 1 Policy or PchCles to be tawed A",OUI~t (,) 0 Al TIl. OwrUtr'g PQlJgy X ProEtOiOd ItI.ured, ~-- 60S ~ ~IOO. 00 iOI 0 At... 1 A loan Pol"V JEFrREV KeI~~L~eE~ . PrOposed Insured 2 'Tl'l9 lISlate or ,nterllt In 1h8 I,"d dfi(7f~ or fliftrred to In tnle C","""fment if"ra eO\'eMd r..rt,tI ,t a Fee SImple. 3 rl1l~ !O Silld 1I:&t11l or lnllllttslln sard land i$ It the effetl1l/8 titte ~reof \leated In' ~1t:90LUTtON TRUST CORPOR~TION AS RIECEIVER OF" HOlLYWOO:O F"liOEF'AL.. BANK, f"Se f. Ttt& Ilfld reflrTBd to In thIS CGmmltme", (s !cealed In fM COI.Inl'i l)f p] NE:LLAS 9t..ol FLORIDA 1M l:I85a'lb8ct u foll~W!; ~OT 12, 1n BLOC!< "0", of 8AVSIOE SUBDIVISION NO.6, UNIT "A", arcording to the ma~ Or ~lat ther.gf ag r~cQrded in Fl~~ Book 51, Pages 48 and 4~t F'uDl1C R.cot'd.. Q f F'i n.l1 alli, County, Fl OY 1da; A;>.JC LOTS 12\, 14, AND 15, in BI..OCk "b", of BAVSIOe: SUBDIVISION NO, ~, UN IT "C", ~cc':>l""d i ng I: 1;:1 the map C"ll'" pI .11 tl'luu'l'9of ett'S t"S-eCY'dM tn Plat Book ~~, ~aQes 19 and 20, Pyblt~ ~&COrd6 of Pin~llas Ccu"ty, Flor~da. "'a! Pe-ge2 STEWART TITL,E G Il' AllANTY co'" PA N Y ". or PAGE 05 NC, 01:31 OOS 920 Sl8 9 97 }~ l,fl.M 03/3E1/20E14 17.~~ __ 9419E!~ljJ , .-L- ' ~ GILLETT ASSOC i""'rA...,)rJ r ""'t..a...J.J. R NO. Altar:lhed to aM made a part of Stewart Title a\.laranty Company Pol,lcy No Contmuatlon of*~X IlI'ld.Ol"Bel'Mnt to Cgnwitl86llt Mo. C-9912-883172 -That the present uee, IItructu.rE!S and OCCU1~iUlliClY hfive been approvE,d by the Board of ~ruBte8.. Schedule B. Part II, It~~ 7 18 hereby amended to ~ead; 7. Te~B and Qond~tions of that certal~ Dock Lease in O.R. Book 7000, Page '53, ABBlg~ment of Lease 1ft O.R. Book 7467, Paye 2250, Publ~o Records of Pin.llas County, fL. SoheduJ~ A, Item 2 is h.~eby amehaed to rG.a Pee Slmple, as to pare.l ~ and L...shold Estate created by the inQtrum8n~ h~reln ~8!.rred to aa SovereigDty SU~r98d Laft4 Lease Renewal e~ecu~*(1 by and bet.ween Board. of Truateee ot the Intern.al IJApr-ovement. T~t ~und of the state of 'lorida and rran.Ohio Sav~ngB Bank, an Ohio Corporat~oft recordea May 15, 1~89 in O.R. Book 7000, Page 153 of the Public R~QQrds of Pin.llas County, rlorida, as to Parcel "B". Schedule A, Ite~ 4, 1. bereby amended to include nparoel A" as to the present legal. and add pp&rQel a~ for &uhm.~ged lands, whioh reads as fol1owa: ~ PARCEL "B" A parcel af eovereigntf land in Clearwater Harbor, ~~tuated ~n 8~etiQn 17. Townllb1p 29 South, Ra.nge 15 i'sBe, PinellaB ao'-'nty, Florida, be~ng ~re part1oularl~ de8Qribed a& follow.: Be91n At the NW cor~er of Lot 12, Slock Df of BaYB1de Subdivision WOe 6 Unit A, as recorded lfl Plat. Jalook 51, Pa.qe'B 48 and 49, af the Public Records of Pinellas County, flotldai thence N. 9 de;. 55' 01~ w. alonv the northerly extension of the westerly line of B41d Lot 12, 5860 le.t; the~ao 5. 81 degf 04' 59" F.., .0.0 leet; thence N. 8 d,ag. 55~ 01" IN" 18.0 fllH!t~ theneu N. 81 deg. 04' 59n R., 30.0 feet; thenoe a. ~ deg. 55' 01n t., 18.0 feet; the~c. N. 81 deg. Q4' 59- R.. 170.a le.t to an ~nter8ectian wlth the no~tbQrly extension ot tha eaBt~rly l~ne of Lot 15, Block D, of 8ayaide BubdiVis10n No. i Ohit C, as r*C6roeQ 10 Plat Book 55, Page. 19 and 20, of the Publi~ Re~ords of Pinellall County, Flot"i.dll; thencft 8. 8 deg. 55' 01" e. along said extension 58.0 feet to the HE corne~ ot said Lot 15; thence S. 81 deg6 04' 59- W. along the .or~herly line of Lots 12 through 15, Block n, 8ayeide SUbdivlB10n NQ. 6. Onits C and A. 240.0 feet to the PO~nt of Beginnlftg. IN ALL OTHSR RESP6CTS TBR ABOVe NUMBBRBD ~I~i COMMiTMENT REMAINS IN PULL FoRCE AND Z'FSCT. Pege CtiART l'lOUSE 8TEWARTT[1r'LE flU..4:""''''''' c.t..l"lr...~' --I CL WGoverSheet .I FLD2004-04026 850 BA YW A Y BLVD Date Received: 04/27/2004 ALMINAR RESIDENCES & SUITES ZONING DISTRICT: T LAND USE: RFH fij) [Errglgl~WJ~ r'~'j UG~R 2'1 ;lJJj J S A 1- __:J ATLA P GE. 285B f'1.AI>lf'.:I:JC" rll \ L, oP., r:1\J I ~Vc;) . CITY OF CtEARWA1ER PLANNER OF RECORD: NOT ENTERED PA I D CK NO ~9 DATE a., (() 4 &"IIAJ C L W CoverSh eet FLD2004-04026 850 BA YW A Y BLVD Date Received: 04/27/2004 ALMINAR RESIDENCES & SUITES ZONING DISTRICT: T LAND USE: RFH ATLAS PAGE: 285B PLANNER OF RECORD: MHR ALMINAR ESTATE VILLAS AND SUITES PRIV ATE MARINA Decade Properties Development June 2004 A ~ "'V\ (VI. <:Ur- 28 J lIr'\t 200 4- M~ MI~t. ~\.......\k Se 1'\1.... p\e:t 1'\ ,^tll"" CI''t of' C\."........,..:t~ R t:. F Lt> 2-004... 0 ~ 02.c. <3 5"0 60., UJ'1 9\u.{. D-ec^J.'C. PV"Ottvi-,,,s. ~A.~ f'"etlIS~ ~ S(.Jl.-:~~ V'~({~"t\~ ~ VII...... Cc'lVVUM,.e..j-~ -tv"""" th.t. +wS'T WElIt~ ~ JlIl1.~ '2.001. We M.v"e. low eo-- lid., iko.. ~t '1..<;~, -n 13 ~'So J.."1Cl?S I & svl"te.s t\ "'\ vl v-e of. vC"42.J f k pA..r~ l'~ 16 c.,,\ e. (lP cJ~ \ 0....... oA. lAQ\ve. V"eJ.....ceJ. t~ "JI.\"l(~ h~I,~f I~ !.-teAl: 4./a. '^" "" no t v est Jl "I' ... \',V ~ F 12 /WI. 0< , ~ 1..."'.... I.... f..... e.\~ V^'tl'O~ ~ We> "^" vC-. r--e J..", e.'" tk.... c-u...-(" cvts. C( t-tg{ 0\. V" I v-e..) .pfl"'d IA"'I. 3 n. 0 l^Q.. cA. k "c 1l! f"\. e ..... "'- t ( 1 h.c::t VoCL V't<" J.vceJ.. ~ I ~c.t of tk -t.~ -t1V'lL ~v L lJ ~I lUe;. ~ o...Clt.. 0\. \ C;; 0 r\I'I..A.k C 0\1'" re ct I 0 lo'l.,S' 0 If" "''''' S ~ e.v-e.J... "6 vI' '> -t ,...... f'v--. tk..... 0 <4 J v"'\ <L "..., r . "t h 0 it... e... 7 ,-.. eev;"f t.A ........... J ",-ve. ~1t ,,1- v-"f . uJt.. Lur ~ t(." I!. V'C! vi ~ i c""- ~e e. +~ W'I r~ ~o clr CArl' V'; VI\;/ ~l "1Cllre ({ 12~ G'((Q1t A If"ckd-~c.t .......;0........ ~ --:...;;..- -....-...... ....... s, ~ ::~'$l;~.: ~~ - -: -,.:-:~~ .;.-'~^~ P~l'lIng Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue CloolWiller. florida 33756 Teleptlone' 727.562-4567 Fax 727-562-4865 CASE #: DATE RECEIVED' RECEIVED BY (staff Inrtlals) ATLAS PAGE f# ZONING DISTFlICT LAND USE CLASSIFICATION. SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES NORTH SOUTH WEST EAST o SUBMIT OA1GJNAl SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPlICATION "",~ '2\1!T 14 COPIES OF THE ORJGINAL APPLICATION Including ~; co"ated. 2) stapled and 3) folded sets 01 site plans -. ....} SUBMIT APpLICATION FEE $ "" ~OTE 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLANS SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive InfiIl Redevelopment Project (Revued 10-10-2003) -PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT - IISC- additional meetl as =sary '\ r'~?"_!Cl\NT. PR:OPEATY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Section 4-202.A) ;:"p';'_CAi\'TNAME ~~1Ii. ~fII"'''t@5 I"-G - A\ ~t" c:t V"' -. \ll,~I,.JNGADDRESS t'\l" vJ 2.4\1,0 RUI~V'wooA Dr. it lOO lUwJ'-esl", WI S3\f19 -=: r _ 1:,'::'DJ:1:::SS 'tJ.{A PHONE NUMBER' 77.1 ~'I 2.. '\ 2. I :,- .'~ '::=- N~ FAX NUMBER Ut 52.1 SCf.'1' I ~;=-~~S~,...,.. OWNEA(S) _~t..Je. p .....^.A.lI"t,,:~ f; llA'---.J. J~ff ~ Q.ltlf 19.1,ev P V"Q" t~~~ (Mulll ,ncludo All .......a..;;;;rll~tad on the deed - p"""'" "r\i:JlnBl Blgneture(a) on page 6) ,.,:0:,\ - 'v.AME(S) WId r '"r'\I~ING ADDRESS' PHONE NUMBER E-MAIL ADORESS =-0'"_ 'o;\~9ER FAX NUMBER S PROPOSeD DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: _":::;.' ~ :::::3~O OT10N STREET ADDRESS of sUbJect 8118 "'1,;:::::=_ Nuw.a~R (if not h!ltl'ld Aita:~ ~te lalocabon of thll.l documant In Ih& WblTlIltaI) :)t\PSEL SIZE j "G Ac ,2 ~~ ~r- [m::IllS squBm leet) --=-:: -:;~S::"J l'SS AND SIZE I~ r~ ~",,,u~P.," ~ (lJ hot.J OCof. js Tctt....I: l " ~ tA\~~ (]Se., (number 01 dw8IlIng units hotel fOOIl19 or 9Q\.l8.Tl;Ilootsga 01 nonreardanUllI use) -=:~S(;RjPT'ON OF AEOUl;$T(S)' An she9tS iIIl(l be ~ctfl(: when ldenUrv,"~ thll reqU6ll1 (mdudll all rflQuesled c0d8 de-vl<ltlol"ls ~~r'<I"'iI :spaces, specific UlIlI, S!C ) r US'" f f '"'....'\1'" ""-.... e... 5> -. Page 1 017 - Flelllble Oevelopmanl Appllcabon' Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment PrOJ6ct- Crty of Clearwatel Best~ Copy ,Available PAGE 02 x<:S T'-I'S APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT AIOHTS (~). A PREVIOUSLY APPROvED PLANNED UNIT ~S \';; _::::P~'ENT, OR A PREVIOUSlY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES NO _ (if yes, attach a copy of tne apphcable :~:: ~~ ,0;: \Vt:tt\~ J( 6 U\1, ~ tb ~~ GvWr~~ ,J..- th+~ ..-" ~j- C PROOF OF OWNERSHIP. (Section 4-202 A) ;(" -2-~,aMIT A COpy OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POliCY. DEEO TO THE PROPEATY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (selt -::'0,;65\ 'J. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS (Section 30913.A) _, ~'~Me eornptet$ responses to the SIX (6) GENERAL APPLICABILl1Y CRITERIA - Explain hRn elilCl'l emMa Is achieved, In dBtalt --~ :;.~;xo3~ co;.vel')pment 01 the land will be In ham'\Ol'ly with tha scale. bulk. COV6fUIJe, darlslty end characl8f of adJacent propartles ,r'l ~_::~~:~ f~a.:,~u~ 'J,l\......;~";b....1 We r-~J."'r.J. k1"o~ \'u~~ S\',\.\~fi'~~ '!;cJ:\rt1 $t"ff ! '-> &".'\lM~ 1 \O\.N~ \..v,. 45' U,,,- \."t. J a\ele tRA II k ,is Q ",.J, ~1 ';f 1\ '1 a J at" 1"9 W41 .1 . --~4.;i \c. ""ow tk ~l!QJe dIAl ~~"'A~tv UJ;!'k ,^"\1"'~wW. ~~-~~==-M'~~~j-~"'2~~L.{~lflcant!Y ~tv~;' ,::n:~ . ". :: L.l.. :.; .::' ." .~ . --.'" c-cposed development 'MIl not adversely affect too health or safety or pel'SOl"lS rooldlng Of wo.1dng In Ihe Mlghborhood of the proposed .tll r~ ruV"l, (v1~ At'. lMi.~i~,'tIN\ I a II'I~ ~H W, 'Oyr'~f~ 0.""<'- J. (" ~ '1. ~~ J... 1.. III vul...... (1\ .q. Ql. f 't.. f tV!..\1 L '" "" III V".11. --:f . - ~'" :)1'?oosed ~8II11S doolgnad 10 minimize traffic pongMtI9n -L rr. .Ll . 4'"""~..~).o~~.",o\ 1~kO.;Ab~ l~~\ \VD.'tTIL T""\"'" 'Vle.lIldUj v<:o _~_ O\J Ie j, S'1 '^ roO fi. WI:.... ;MAI? Tr..ff.c.. f Ol.o.~o.... . tio-:t~ ~~'L ~t..J '1 "'Ulll'".J, ~~....e loti ~9S.J ~/G, f''''~I;~.tI. S T'\e proposed deYelopmel'lll$ conSistent WIth the communrty ehameler 01 thelmmocllate vicinity of lhe pen::at proposed for developmoot _~____ ~/~""~I&t~S~ ~~~ ~ ~ t.~~~ tA.~(~I~.1 __~~.('eJ.lt'~".-~ o.~~4l~.o- ~;tt...~}.......M.I\ 1'1I~.s I L,...~." E lc?'7~\A. fA.v.J 'fI'~k~. $ ins d8~lJgn of me proposed develQpfTlant mlnlmlz6S advAI'S9 effflCts, Including Visual, acoustlc and olfactory and hours of operatlOll'mpac'l6. CO" 2d"}B.c9f11 properties ..L ..4. ~ J. -l I ~ ~ ~~~""Ti'~'ic:.;li: <-~.J. :. J:;~~:; \;~l:,:~~r ":'1 -~e oevelopment or r9development of thG parcttl proposed tor davelopmenlls o1hel'Wl$e Impracllcal without devlaUo7f~" 9 I, I a"10 development standarool'_ a.! ",,\u J.Q VUL"t-llMol.C ..U.... l'",\vtlt i. ok. I]J,I/CtJ U:U? \~ ~rp~J -t~ t':6 u;~ _ _~Lv~.."y4-t V \0\ tlf>uc.... lA^ -tit \ I/",;t.. #\..~ 1'" tv" U lili, ~, 'f"....t v. c,. \,ga~.. 1 "" r.;..l Ilk\. u.p ~ \.I~\J ~,~~ -^ -r- 1) Page:2 of 7 - Flexible Oevelopmttnt Applll,;atlon . Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Projecl- City of Clearwal6f' 2 ""e development 01 the parcel proposed lor d8velopment 6.S 6. oompr9henslve I II PfOJOCI will not 'O~w';9 'hi! fair rnar\(et value of abutting propElr!lell {Include !he 8XIsbng vatu ~I the Site wrlh the --~, ",~p.'1ts) ~>:.1~+ ::t..:. tk (l...~.:Il;. 1lu.- - ..~.. "'~ ...L...".., PAGE 133 - -I'''' }:;ss 'Vlthln the comprehensive InUlI redevelopment project are othelWlStt p8rrmtled In the Ciry of Clearwaler __,.....:::,,? v$i'$ I \Ao"<t.\ A.lA~ f'~'U\..GHL~4J A.V~ Pi!v..,..;.-\tJ I~ ~ L~-t'l I'l-t C tr~~:h.r 4 The usee or mix of usa withIn the compmhenslve Inllll redevelopment Pl'Oject a.re compatible wl1l1 adJ8.Cent land uses 'rtt~ ~LlJUl:avJ~~ ~ ~V'L "'~ji~ kdt...~#...L.t---"(4 _~_V_\.M_J.. ~tJ tfb,..-t; (ll''''-f "^~ ~ 1.1 J .....tl G.t)\1.....~\~ w iiU,",;~ "^\~ '-'!Cl . .;; Suitable sites tor devoIopm8111 or redavelopmenl of the uses or mix of U$e& WIthin the comprehensive Inf\ll redevelopment proJecl are not :l1h9fVt'lsr,l!IV8J1abIe .n I~e City of Clearwat",. I 'I I il . J.' \ (\~y .c.t~ oOl.I"''- OTcOIl....~.p I ~~~\....'" 4t.. A.vUl ",\, SI f't. I~ (/k'llve 1 ~"cQiotl ~ (.. a ~""'rp...-tov <'lt~ +;...... t~;,. KAII-") "'S~. 6. The development 0' the parcel Pf'OPO$Eld for development as a eomprehenslve lfJlilJ rud6vslopm8nt proJ8C1 WIll upgrade Ihelmmedlale ....lcInlty ,,' the parc~ ~ for deveIopm89f. ( . ..c.. "" I I l . _~'~..u.1'" 1\.<u;o I'''H~lr.......\pJ. P^v\'l"'1 I t'1!.(. ("e~\ Ill"" a.lo4.A.ek.I!\' p!i I 11'5\.1. tAlA.. J.. S;t:.Dt r"~ __ _J:~ ~ ~d1,~{, J.Jt 1..,\.J-. lM...et,ttV'......u,-\ llU....~ tt.,~.... /rke. ~ W tU U M V"~R. ilut iii V'~ '\ " W ~{',' L....~ 7 The desIgn ollh6 proposed comprehensive Infll1 redevelopm~ project creates 8 fob and function that eMilnC8S the community character of .~'? 'mm8dlate V1Clnlly of the parcal proposed for development and the City of Cl&arwa.tel as a whols ____ c ~~~~ ~~ J- c."~U"lt~ oL~... ..l.. 1..1 fh.c-r" -0.'"t..,J.. Qi4r~ pk"'~;j eit....~ W~ 1,/~ : ~Vl t ::~il.~,~':r 'r~~~.J,=f" "oJ .I... t".I......l ~". ..,JI """'1~ ::' :::lexlblUry In regard to lot width r8qulred setbacks. height and off-slr991 parSl,lng are JuslffiQd by the oonef1lA ItI oommunlry ehara,cter and the --~ ate Vlelnlty of the parcel proposed for ctevlllopmenl and the City of Clearwater aa a whole '.41;2. t"t'\Lle~ 4, \ h:. t,w l4j. Cd l.t,~~'t.~ w';\~ I k ck:..~~lf of ~ . ~=~...Jl-. ~ US ~ S lit ~ J.. _~t.... I ~. l..t.. .1 ~ If... \.I.. .., I""'~ ,h _~_~~{"~tl_ c~~Ptih~~. ~(:f'JJa'e off.street p8l1(lng m thelmmed!B.t8 VlCll1lty according 10 Iheshared parking formula In Dlvlsloo14 of Artlcl8 3 will be available to ::: ~ ::: -S'''?st pat1<.lng In th9lmm9dlat8 v1dnlty 01 parc91 proposecl for development '\1\ ~ V""~tit'e........&..j.. D.IAJ.. "-t4.lI'k.i ~...,v.J.. f""....h .......e.- ACe &.......... Cl'~t..vt 1M. d t..... "llA ('"(os,..(J.. ~d~. 04. 5. it. ~ ~ <C, .t~ f;.v~ l1 te''tv,~.J. - ~~ _ '?- 0 ' ~' gli )~1 dl"gs compiles with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelInes In DMslon 5 of Artlde 3 (as applicable) _'S-'" <;:, ;<,-'2,9 sheets as necassal'y ~~ UJ':1 lO~r\ l~ L..;ti(., T60h0'I)t D,dv,..t VO~V\V~.....j, e..~ ~l\ e(~~I'".Js "f __b~ 1....., o.,.~ (.;\ · ~~L,O\t~" I t'.....,ll;l~~ r"~':t~1 ,;tv-u."\SClI\rlt.-t ~f~ p~ f\ f t. I ____ _ _": _~ ~_~1.'l-",," '-LA "i "" o..J'oQ ~ L-L \.M.,"J.tt~." .J...,:t;ll ".....e ....L\ 'lit. t~~..~ ~e J~~, Page 3 of 7 - Flexible Development ApplIcation. Cclmprehenstve Inllll Redevelopment PrOj8Ct- City ot Clearwater : - S'''"E DATA TABlE for 9Jdstlng. required. and proposed deVelopment, In 'Nffttanttabular lorm. ~"<C ,-.am' ar86 In square feel am:! acres. ~ Number of EXISTING dweUing units; :/ Number of PROPOSED dwelling unlB, 3"='33 floor area devoloo to each 1.1&&; ":' ~ -" -~ spaces' total numb8r, presented In tabular form wrlh !he number of required Spac8S, - :-^~, ::=ved area Including all paved parking :spac8'S Wld drtveways, exprQSt;OO In square feet and percel11age 01 the paved veh~r area. := 7<;: ~m:l Spe-;l9$ of a/llandscape material. 0:11clal records book and page numbers of all existing utilJty oosement; ::iu' ding and slructure hetghls, Impermeable surface ratio (I S R l, and Floor area ratio (F,A R ) for all nonresll:lentlal US&s -v _.c: _J<... -~ ----- ~ -"" -":: ----'<:' -'..... --- _l:_ ....JL J:1A PA.GE 04 E. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) / ~ -::...,:,::::, P'I9 SEALED SURVEY (IncludIng IO'gal descnpbon of property) - One Oflglnal and 14 copies, -,/ -," --=iEE SURVEY (meIudlng existing trees on srte and wllttln 2S' of tile adjacllflt site, by species, slze (DBH 4' or greater), and location, Including dnp bnes and Incbeatlng Ir68S 10 be removed) - plBass d6s1gt'/ around the exfsrtllg tmes; if LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY. :op <:-'Z''\:G :JEMAND STUDY In COflJUOCtlon wtth a r$Quesl to mak8 dEMatlons to tile parking standards (I 8 Reduce number of spaces) Prior to .~ ::: "~;"1 <tal of thiS application. the methOdOlogy of such s1VCIy &hall tie apprOVSd by the COmmunity Development Coordinator and shall be In 3':COmance VJrth <lCC$pted traffic en.l:fn98nng princIPles. The findings of the ltudy wlJl be ~ In dotermlnlng whether or not devlatlOns to the ;:larldog standards are approved: Us.vl C .ole.. V"e~v\~~' ~ GRADING PLAN, 8S appIk:abl9, ::>9ElI},tINARY PLAT, as t;lqulrad (Note BUIlding pennlt:s 'MIl nol be ISSUed unlll evidence of r8COf'dlng a fina.l plat IS provided), '1()'t- ...V\....l~ 7:''''v 0'" :U:CORDED PLAT. as app/lcabl8, F. SITE PLAN SUBMrTT AL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) co,/ SIT~ ~LAN with trle fOllOWing ,"formabon (not 10 exceed 24- It 361' ./ /, :'"~?"'slons, -~-"'"- ::-101\ ~ / ':0 ':; . :; I '19 ca' scala (minimum scale 008 Inch equals 50 foot), and date prepared: _ocr.tCI'1 map, lrdex sheet referencing lndlv1dual sheets Included In packags. Footpnnl and SIze 018/1 E:XISTlNG bulldln9S and Wuetures, Footprint and size of all PROPOSED bulldin(JS 8l1d structures, Includ8 floor plates on muttl.story buildings ~I -eQUred setbacks, Al' roo'stIng and proposed j)OIn19 of aCC8S9, All reqvlred sight tnangl8s. Idsntlfk:8t1on of er'lIIIronmenlally unique areas. such as watercourses. wetlands, tree masses. and speelman trees, IncludIng dascrlpllon 9I'Id location ot undomlOry, 91'011"" cover vegetation and wildlIfe habitats, 8tc Location 0' all public and private Gasament&, Location of alJ sl'r'aet rights-of-way wlttun and adjacent to the 8n6, location of exlstlflg public and prlvat8 utilllJss. Including nrs hydrants, storm and sanitary S8WQr Unas, manholes and 11ft StatlOllS, gas <!"d water lines; (' Note Per S8ctIon 3-911, all utUltI8s sllllll b8loc8locllr9located undargr'l)llnd) A oo>klng: spaces. drlvEiW3)/$. Ioadlng areas and vehicular use areas, Including handicapped spaces, :9PlctJon by Shading or crosshatching 01 all reqUIred parking lot mtooOl' landscaped areas; Location of all solId waste conlalners recycling or trash handlIng arsas and outside mechanical equlpmer"lt Qnd all r&qlllfOO screening {per Section 3-201 (DliIl and Index .70l}, LocatIOn 01 alIlande:cape malenal, locabon of arl lunsdlcbonaJ Imoo adjacanl to wetlancls. location of aD onslta and offslts sIorm-water managem8flt1aclIltlss. _ 'J';;'3,'t.:''l of all outdoor II ghtl ng Ii xllJre8. and _=at-on of all 6ldstmg and propoood otdewodka ...-J.c.. _'t::: -~ -" v .' -' -- - ::-~M =-O:VElOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE. provide the following acIdItIooallnformatlon on SIte plan ~ / , ~ C"s foot CQfllou", or spot elevatJOn9c on sl!e. -- - O;;slte e18Vations rt required to !:MlluatO' thO' "reposed stormwater management tor the "arcel, An open space areas, Location of all earth or water ~Ialnlnll wallll al'1d Q.Glrth bonns, lot lines and building lInes (dlmensIOl1ed), Streets and dnvas (dimenSIoned), BUlldmg and structural Getbacks (dlm~lnsjoned) S " _ ~',_",:\I overhangs, >O~ '~"g'1'ory' preparGd by a .certJllcd arbonsr, of all trees 8" DSH or graaler. reflectmg SIze, canopy (dnp lines) and condition of such trees Page 401 7 - FJeXlble Development Appllcatn:m- Comp<ElhenslVe Inlill Redevelopment ProJec1- CIIy of Clearwater ...:L "' ./ -I- '" PAGE 05 ~- LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) J! LANDSCAPE: PLAN All rodstlng and propooad structulllS Nam6S 01 abutllng streow, Drainage and rot9fl1lon arMS Including swal&s, slde slopes and bottom el8Vatlons, Dellnaetton IiIld dirntlflsiQm; 01 all required perimeter Iandscapa buffers, Sight VISIbility lnangf9s; ,:,?,'...gstlon and cIImenslol'l9 of all parking areas Including Iand$caplng ISlands and curbing, "-:---:"':sc and 'ooulrBd parkIng spaces, =) l"t'~9 t'soss on-sIte and Imm~lately adjacent to th6 sits, by spacles, size and locabons, tncIudlng drIp1lne (as Indicated on r~qiJIled tree SUNey). Plant scMdule with a key (symbot or Jabal) Indicating l/'I4l $12:$, de6cnpbon, spgcIlJeatlol'lS and qUW"lbbas of all exisllng and proposed landscape matenal8, Including botanical and common namoo. Location, size, and quantltlee of all ElXlstmg and pmpos8d landscllpQ rnatEll1als, ,ooFC.!lt8d by a key relallng to the plant sch9dule, TyplC8I p1anbng datHIls for tre!lS, palms. shrubs and ground cover plants Including InetructlOtl8. SOIl mlX89, backfllkng, mulCl'lIng and ::"O'st'1ve msas u 1'89, ~~~.:~ 'a"oscaplng areas hatched and/or shad8d and lab6lad and Interior landscape COVtJJage, axpresslng In both square feet and pe;cet1l:age COV8r&d, CondItIons of a puwlous development approval (e g concfibons Imposed by the Commurllty Development Board), I rrfgatlorl notes REDUCEOD LANDSCAPE PLAN to aeo.t... (8 ~ )( 11), In color P4iGATlON PLAN (required lor lavel Two and Three appllcabons) CC MPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM appUeallon, lt$ applIcable --'-- L ~ j~- ./- - STORMWATER PlAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Design Criteria Manual and I" p20:;' .A.21) STORVWATER PlAN Incrudfngltle followlng requlr&men!8 Exlstmg topography exlandlng 50 toot b&yOnct all pl'Operty linea, Proposed grading Including finished floor eleva1l008 of atl structures, All adjac8nt streets and muolClpaJstorm systems. P'''':losed stom1water detentlonlrntendon area InclucIlng top of bank, toe 0' slope and outlet control slructure. 3'')'"T' ''PI",. calculations for atl6fluabon and water qual1ty; " :;~ ~ ~;2 ':'~ ;;'('ida reglstttr8d Pro~lonaJ EllgIn86r on III pllID5 and calculations Y COpy OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval IS required priOr to 1(lI;,USJ1C$ of City Building Perrl'lI!), tf applICable (.- COpy OF STATE AND COUNTY STORMWATEA SYSTEM TIE-IN PERMIT APPLICATIONS. 11 apptIcable BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section +202,A.23) RlIQUlr8d In the event the application 1l'lC1ud&$ a development -.hare OO&Ign standards are In ISllue (e 9 Tourisl and Downtown DlstrK;tS) or as pari 01 a Comprehenslve Inflll Redevelopment Project Of a A88Id8nbal Innn PrOI8CI c~ 'LJ1'JG ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all s1~ of alt butldlngs Including halght dimensions, 00I0rS and mamrlals '" ;;':'J JCEO BUILDING El!;v A TIONS - four SideS 01 bulldlng w11h colors and materlall> to scale (8 Ut X 11) (black and white and color rendenrlg, II pOSSIble) as required $IGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS I Sec1I00 3--1806) ~ I ~~:'3-ING free$fandlng and attach8d signs, PlTIVld8 photographs and dimenSions (area, h91ght, ale ). IndlcatEl whether they Will be remov!ld or "': "~12 - o All PROPOSED lreestandlng and attached SignS, Provide defall& Including location, 91.2e, height, oolon;, malllnals and draYor'lng, fl'lleSla(ldlng SIgnS snail Include the street ~1'el;lS (numarals) ('-;-' 5.6~e"'s've SIgn Program application, as appncable (sgparale application and fGB required) - ~c ~~.~ ~ ~~"''J~ ptOfXY3S1 (8 ).';: X 11) (color)," !iubtrul1lng Compr9henslve S19(1 Program applIcation Pa9ll5 of 7 - Flexible Development Apphcabon . Comprehensive Imll Aedavelopmllr\t Prolect- City 01 Clearwater PAGE 02/134 K. TRAFFle IMPACT STUDY: (SeCtion 4-202A13 and 4-801.C) l a Include 88 r&<;jlJlrod II proposed developm4lnt Wla (k)gfaCfIl the acoeptoble 19VaI of IGI'Vlce for ~ n .ldway sa "lOptod In Ine Com!N9har.sJva p "'_ Tr1p y&n9ratlon shall be bMW on the I'TlOSt rec&nI edllton of the Instltute 01 Tnm8pOl1tlUwl EI'.gJne-I'r'. Trip Go:l',~1 ~nval Re'e. to 5.'<;:II(""F, ~ ,,~ C Ollht Community D8vltlopmenl COtlf for aJCCSpttOf1S to thls reQUlf'Bment. t, the lIndef$gned. acknowledge thot aJI repr&a8ritatlor1s mad8 In 1.'l1. appllcatlon are true and accurate to the belrt of my knowledge Ilf1d 8uthorl 'fY rept8S9fllatlvoo 10 vlalt and photograph !fle propany dese In hie appllcallon ~vW , State of Wisconsin, Cqunty of Wauk~sha ifrMt 01' rLeFIltJA. :;etlNTY {I r PINI:LL1c8 ""\ '("~....... Smm TO and sui ;lCrlbed b IIfore . me 1h>5 ~. ca,' ~, 3\J~e.~ AD. ~~ to me 2Jr.c/e, " _ who IIQemonaJly kJ1Qwrijha." Produced --- _ a" ldent1Rcal!orl 1 I L. SIGNATURE: r or repr&Mnlallve ~~) -f.. Notary pubflo, My conunlaloo expire I ~) ~ @ !~ 0 W l~ ~' I ill uu JUN 3 0 "JO~ 'I I I I. J I PLAt-.lN'f 1(,- ~ DrVClOr'."lf ,,- S "Q) I <: IT" Of CL[t,,') ~ l" ... ) Page e 017 - F'~)(lbf8 OlMllopment Application - Comprehenslvlt Inffll Red8\1Dlopmenl -'roIBCt- ell'f of Clearwater ALMINAR ESTATE VILLAS & SUITES MARINA CLEARWATER BEACH o Resort enclave with two and three directional views, intriguing loggia pool with views to North and South Intercoastal. o Club, concierge, sun terrace, loggia, roof terrace and marina features. o Dramatic floating penthouse with complete open . VIews. o Estate landscaping and shoreline walk. -I ".- . : . -- ; IE z c....> C> , 1"'. ~ CJ <=l ..J::'" I' Ii ,1' ' ~ I I' I I, i , I' I Y I , ~ ~. ~ It ~ "'- Q '-l 1) l' 3 I' ,. ~~ J r I' ,I Y.- .01 ' '1n ,',-' ~ / 3: /1, I , / , ! , I ' ! ,: ,--...... f GI III '<. ~ ~ i j ;;. ~ .... .. U) <:[ ~ <:[ .. ~ - t- <:[ ~ a ~ - ill Q a o BUILDING Ake::A TABULATI,ON6 epACES ENC1..05ED SLOG TERRACE TCiUER> AREA (ef') GR05e AFiiEA (eR-) PARK1N6 LEVEL. 1 3tZl 14.611 tZl LOADING ZONE 1 T'rPICAL LEveL :2 10.610 3,:m TYPICAL LEvel :2 ~.61D0 3,:m T'rPrCAL LEVEL 3, 11,210 2,210 PENTi-IOU5E LEVEL 50 11,210 2.6 etZl UNITe RESIDENCES HOTEL TYPICAL LEveL :2 3 2 T'rPICAL LEVEL :2 2 2 T'rPICAL LEVEL 3, 3, 2 PENTI-IOUSE LEveL 5 5 0 13 " TOTAL 6UILDING I-lOTEL sutTEe UNITS 6 UNITe TOTAL BUILDING RE5>!DENT1AL UNITe. 13 UNITS TOTAL ENCL05ED eulLDING: AREA. 501,3lZ11 SF TOTAL TERRACe: 6UILDING ARSA. 11,5&4 SF TOTAL OCCUP.A.NT LOAD I-lOTEL PARKJNG 6 6PACE5 (INCLUDINCi. 1l-lC) CONDO PARK.!NG 24 &PACES (INCLUDING: I GUEST) ALMINAR RESIDENCES .. BUtTES FLORIDA 6UILDlN:!l: CODE. :2t:N:11 EDITION INCLUDING THE FLOFi!lDA ACCE55le1L1TY CODE NFPA 101, LIFE SAFETY CODE, 2012Xl' EDITION ~MAR'f Cl4AF"TER W NEW APT SLOGS OCCUPANCY CLA66IFICATION. ENCL05ED 6UILDING AREA TEIi'RACE AREA TOTAL SUILDJN:::a: AREA RE61DENTIAL I-lIGHRlSE 51,3lZ11 SF 11,5.&4 SF 6e~leF APT PORTIONs. ~ 212)0 SF PER PERSON G~ ELEV. '",,' NGYD (AE) ELEv liZl"" 4a'~IZl" ABOvE eASE FLOOD ELEV. PLUS lb'~iZl" OYER RUN FOR ELEvATQRlMECI-l WITH TURIT LO S STORIE5o PLIJ8 ROCf= AND ELEVATOR ME04.A.NlCAL LEveL MAX.. BUILDiNGs i-lT BY CODE. ~'A6OVE 6A5E FLOOD ELEV QCCUP.A.NTLOAD ELEvATION 15T FlOOR. FLOOD ZONE 6U1L.DlNG l-lElGI4T 1""00.. d, " ~. J ':::. rm ~~ I -I- !cZ -.~ ~.,.. -1eJ r_-, <:i "'FlI ' ~ , ~, n. I-' . ~~ - , ,~~g 'I; ("0, ) : ~:.'" CI . ) , ....:) , I 1 . ',) r ;~) z , ~ Ll 0:' j =-- - ~ TYPE 11 SEE STFalCTURAL PLAN5 6'1' OE OLSEN . A56OC. DETERMINED BY THE PR.OV1510Ns. OF ASCE 1 (160611 FBC) RJLLY FIFi!E ~INKLERED eLDG. F'ER 6CCINFPAliZll CW-3.5) FULLY FIRE ALAR1 PROTECTED 6LDG. PER SCCJNFFA101 (30.3.4) T'rFE OF CONSTFalCTIDN ALLOWAeLE FLOOR LOAD. DESIGN WIND LOADS- UNIT EXIT ACCEee. TWO Fi1EHOTE EXIT 6T AIR TCiUER& ARE 6MOKEFROOP TOWER5 ClfT A Il-lR FIRE RATED EGRES50 CORRIDOR FER F6C llD0S.5 .I i I , ~ ~ ~ I + + + + ~ t t 'lit Ii Iii Ii 'Ii 'I I " ,jIl ,jIl III I , I I~ I" I" ," , _......... .....1_ ~ _I i I I ' , 1 1 ' . 1 I ' 1 I , I - it , ,. I I I I :1 ~ II! -t :i ~ It ~ 2 ... c t; ~ ! 4> t t t t t t I 'I 'I '~ '~ 'i i' ! !.. !. !~ !. ..., I i I I III Z :! ~ .t pi " m ~ ,~ -+ 2 I 4- !I - , I I I I I I !I j, i~ i~ i~ i! il +-++ + ;. ;. ;- , EO &: s::: I I I I I 9~~' .= iff>.1 '"= I =~ (~ 1-' r, I ,i.. 'I 1ft .. (p ,I -f .1 J!! . ~ III -f 2 I I , I ..... I ! I I ! .. I I il il i~ i~ i~ i! +tt" t + + + .. C 1; ~ ~ ..................... //I C :j m F--- ,J I' " ': '" 'I,. c ___-....~ t-:l:z: tA- .....-t f'.J G:I :\ =--- J; t.3 c ~s (l'I ~lf --- ... ~ NC ~~ ;:j '::\ I .., no \ !l (}l , C ~ m ~~ WZ ~=\ boo geO alT1TQbg ~~~~~I\LQr rli~'J;? ~_,~ttJ.--\ 1l)tf"'P'&~'4-~7~ ~v~~.. .....~...r~"I(:1o ~~(\jl *,Wi"". ~~ l:l~._("'\- ~~q ""r:~ ~~~' f. ".....,.~ "'~':.=. '., ~~ "'\f':--~ l"i::'''l ~~~~_ ----=-- "~';Il 'ClIo- -~ ~ Jtt " _ ~r.-;;;." ~~ ~\ .................:4TE\\'D'.t~ '1'#01 D C I T Y 0 F CLEARWATER PIANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FlORlDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVJcrs BUll DING, 100 SO!ITH MYRTLE AVlcNUe, Cl EARWATER, FLORIDA 37756 TELEPHONF (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 LONG RANGIo. PlANNING DIo.VELOPMFNT REvIEW September 21, 2005 Mr JeffKelerleber Decade Propertles Inc Nl9 W24130 RlvelWood Dnve, SUite # 100 Waukesha, WISCOnSIn 53188 RE Development Order - Case FLD2004-04026 - 850 Bayway Boulevard Deaf Mr KeIerleber I am m receipt of your letter requestmg an extensIOn oftlme relahve to the above referenced Development Order and hereby approve of a one-year extensIOn to September 21, 2006 All Condl hons of Approval as stated wlthm the Development Order dated September 28,2004 remalll III effect In grantmg the one-year extensIon, It IS our hope that the additIOnal tIme will allow for the InItiatIOn of a bUIldIng permIt Please contact Michael H Reynolds, AICP, Planner III should you have any questIOns regardmg thIS extensIOn Smcerely, Michael Delk, AICP PlannIng DIrector .) lPlannmg DepartmentlC D BlFLEX (FLD)\fllafllve ar Fmlshed Appl1callOnslBayway 850 A 1m III (ll (7] - ApprovedlLevel Two Approval ExtenlslOn September 21 2005 doc BRlAN J AUNGST, /v!J\YOR COMMI';')IONLR Hmo H ~MlI TO,", VJC~ MA "'OR-COMMI~';IONfR WI,II NH G R.\Y (.O~I~t1S~IOM R FRANK !/IIJB/\RD, COMMISSION! R * Bill JONSON, COM,II',,,IOMR "EQl1AJ FMPr OYMfNT Ai'-iD AI r rRMt\lIVf ACl ION hl!'1 OWR" ~~lnllrDQ'Q", ~ e ~~<<\.t~c, Fl/tJt'.,. ~~...\ '@",..u##,..,.'8~,1""~ ..~~",., ~" .. ~~...t, ~ ~ I:l~~ ~\L, - ~ q ~:: _I, ':. ~ .. ~. = ,........, "'=lC1::, ..~';. -:::-=:..=-~ ~I:l "'1r' : ~ ~--"- ;,::.~ ~?~....;--- ...~\'" "'..:rlf?E"7..,,~~... ................/" TElft, ,It~ Q./Tff 11 g D ~ CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT Posr OFHCE Box 4748, CI~ARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAl SFRVlCES BUilDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVl:NUr, CLEARWAThR, FLORIDA 33756 TElEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 LONG RANGE PlANNING DFVFLOPMENT REVIEW September 21, 2005 Mr JeffKelerleber Decade Properties Inc N19 W24130 Rlverwood Dnve, SUIte # 100 Waukesha, W Isconsm 53188 RE Development Order - Case FLD2004-04026 - 850 Bayway Boulevard Dear Mr KeIerleber r am III receipt of your letter requestmg an extensIOn of time relative to the above referenced Development Order and hereby approve of a one-year extensIOn to September 21, 2006 All Conditions of Approval as stated wIthm the Development Order dated September 28, 2004 remaIll III effect In grantmg the one-year extensIOn, It IS our hope that the addIttonal time Will allow for the InItlatlOn of a buddIng permIt Please contact MIchael H Reynolds, AICP, Planner III should you have any questIOns regardIng thiS extensIOn Smcerely, Michael Delk, AICP PlannIng DIrector S IP/anmng DepartmemlC D BlFLFX (FLD) 1/na clIVe or FinIshed Appbcamms\Bayway 850 A/muwl (7) - ApprovedlLevel Two Approval ExtemslOlI September 21 2005 doc BRIAN J AUNG~T, MA\OR-COMM[~SIONFR HOYT H"MIL10i', VleF MAYOR-COMMISSIONFR WHITNrv GRAi, CO\lM['i~IONf-R hANK HII\IlARD, COMMISSIONFR * BJI I JONSON, COMMI~~IOl\f-H "F QUAI EM PLOY~11 N r AND At ~ I HMA llVI: ACllON EM PI OYFR" 1219/19/85 12'54 DECADE ~ 727 562 4865 NO. 156 G01 Via Facsimlls 727-561-4865 1 page A N s qllqlos Mr Michael Reynolds Cl ty 0 f Clearwater Plarmmg Department MuruClpal Services BUlldmg 100 South Mj'Ttle Avenud Clearwater. FL 33756 1 I RE Case FLD2004-04026 - 850 Bayway Boulevard ! I Dear Mr Reynolds. i , , , As a follow-up to our letter faxed to YOll on September 7, 2005 and your phone message of today, I am provldmg the followmg Ulfonnation for your consideration We are requesting this extensIon dllC to numerous delays that have made 1t difficult for US to obtaIn the bUlldmg pennlt in the time-frame ongmally antIcipated As you may know, Hurncane Frances caused slgmficant damage to our Gulfvlew Resort Just down the block from the above referenced property Even though the subject property (850 Bayway Blvd.) suffered httle damage dunng the Humcane, the damage suffered by Gulfview caused our entire plannmg, engmeenng and development process to be thrown offtr8ck In addition, the engmeenng aspect of the 850 Bayway project ran IOta sigmficant delays due to the fact that we had httle control over the thIrd party servlce proVIders. Also, the unusual amount of activity on all of the other projects in Or around Clearwater Beach has further contnbuted to the delays in gettmg the needed things done on a trmely basiS Currently, however, all of our plans and engmeenng have been finahzed and we are workmg With two or three contractors to obtam pncmg and lUllIng estlmates that should allow us to proceed shortly As such,' we respectIvely request the extension mentioned In our September 7, 2005 letter We beheve ~t slgmficant progress on the project IS bemg made and we feel the project will move smoothly from tlus pomt forward , I I you have any questIons, please do not hesltate to call me at 262-522-8990 RIVERWOOD CORPORATE CENTEFI N19 W24130 RIVERWOOD OR, SUITE 100 WAUKESHJ', WISCONSIN 53188 TELEPHONE. (262) .522. B990 FA)( · (262) . 522 · B999 G;'l' - O jl~ - ~ - - II ~ ;,/\;~ _c,arw atef TO: FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 s. MYRTLE AVE., 2nd Floor CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 I if;,n:- k8 / ~ t.U E:/f.r v :262- n?-PFf7f FAX: Phone: FROM: J11//C$.- MyA/o utJ/ Phone: 72.. 7- r,7,-C/r.?t, DATE: cf~A~ I~, 1G:6JSUBJECT: ~1.J206V- oVO?-c, f rfb 18..;1 yt./A-y IJ L (/.4 MESSAGE: .rP.JP / .PL/<7"d"C ~~ ~ v1t?n dN 4/-$/'67 0; ~ &-ry,~ /4~"A//7;~ M-A7k~.A'~T ~~l/Jt! ~h?rt-"#//f/?- ~ L1~t:V /t~) a..J dP ;, ~A/J cm~47 ~ /01-A4d~ &fU.c .IV./- 1b tP,:1 U/Lt'/ dA- /!/.LJ(/,,~ ,,4 U~~ /./j7J-/ tJl'>t k~~u~/'i'Jd .A::; Jbop Ad ;'J" ,/;//.1 U. NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) J- DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND OTHER PROCEDURES ~ 4-407 after receipt of comments from the development reVlew comnuttee A nnnor reVISIOn IS one whlCh ) 1 Does not alter the locatIon of any pnvate street and/or d.nveway by more than 20 feet 2 Does not change the use unless such change IS of a sln:n.lar or less mtensIty, as deter- mmed by the commurnty development coordInator 3 Does not mcrease the denSity or mtenslty of the development . 4 Does not result m a reductIOn of setback or prevtously reqUITed landscape area 5 Does not result In a substantIal change to the locatIon of a structure preViously ap- proved 6 Does not result m a substantial mod1fica- tIon or the cancellatIOn of any condItIon placed upon the applIcatIon as ongmally approved ) 7 Does not add property to the parcel pro- posed for development 8 Does not mcrease the height of the butld- mgs In a manner that will change the overall height of the project, Will not alter the scale of the project, does not exceed the maxunum height pernutted m by the applIcable special area plan and zomng d1stnct 9 Any other nnnor reVIsIOn that does not substantIally alter the character and de- Sign of the project BOther revlswns Any other adjustments or changes not specIfied as "mrnor" shall be granted only m accordance WIth the procedures for ongt- nal approval (Ord No 7106-03, ~ 22, 9-18-03) Section 4-407. Expiration of a Level Two ap- proval. Unless otherwIse speCified m the approval, an apphcatlOn for a butldmg permit shall be made Wlthm one year of the date of the Level Two approval, and all reqUIred certificates of occu- pancy shall be obtamed wlthm two years of the Supp No 12 date of Issuance of the ImtIal bmldmg permit Pernntted time frames do not change with succes- sive owners An extensIOn of time to IrntIate a butldmg perrrnt may be granted by the commu- ruty development coordmator prOVided It IS for a penod not to exceed one year, IS for the project ongmally approved and prOVided good cause IS shown and documented m wntmg WIthm the ongtnal penod of vahd1ty The commumty devel- opment coordmator may also conSider whether slgmficant progress on the project IS bemg made and whether or not there are pendmg or approved Code amendments winch would SignIficantly af- feet the project The commuruty development board may approve one additional extensIOn of time after the commurnty development coordmator's extensIOn to ImtIate a buildmg permit applIca- tion Such extenSIOn shall not exceed one year, shall be for the project ongtnally approved and shall be for good cause shown and documented m wntmg The commuruty development board must receive the request for thiS extensIOn wlthm the one-year penod of vahd1ty after the ongmal ex- tensIOn approved by the commuruty development coordmator Good causes may mclude but are not hnnted to an unexpected natIOnal cnsls (acts of war, slgrnficant downturn m the natIonal econ- omy, etc), excessive weather-related delays, and the lIke In the event a project IS governed by a development agreement, the tIroeframes estab- lIshed III the agreement shall supercede these requrrements The commumty develQpment board may also conSIder whether slgrnficant progress on the project IS bemg made and whether or not there are pend1ng or approved Code amendments wlnch would Slgmficantly affect the project Amend- ments WhICh Will require no or mrnor amend- ments (as prOVided by sectIOn 4-406 A) may be approved Amendments which will reqmre a ma- Jor reVISIOn to the subject project shall be reqUired to be approved as part of a new Level '!\vo apphcatlOn Transfer of development nghts are exempt from tlns proVISion, (Ord No 6526-00, ~ 1,6-15-00, Ord No 7106-03, ~ 23, 9-18-03) CD4 20 1 Reynolds, Mike From' Sent To Subject Pullin, Sharon Fnday, September 16, 20051 11 PM Reynolds, Mike Phone message Please call Karen with Jeff Kelerleber's office re FLD2004-04026/850 Bayway Blvd This IS about a letter requesting an extenSion that was sent to you and Michael Delk Since Michael )S not here, I am forwarding to you 262-522-8980 x1308 Thanks, Sharon Pullin Planning Department City of Clearwater I - PROPERTIES Via Facsimile and US Mail 727-562-4576 4 pages Mr Michael Reynolds Mr Michael Delk CIty of Clearwater Planmng Department MUlllClpal ServIces BUIldmg 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 RE Case FLD2004-04026 - 850 Bayway Boulevard Dear Mr Reynolds and Mr Delk Pursuant to the Development Order from the City of Clearwater dated September 28, 2004, an apphcatlOn for a bUlldmg permIt must be made wIthm one year of FleXIble Development approval, which IS September 21, 2005 The purpose of thiS letter IS to request from the Commulllty Development Coordmator a one-year extensIOn to Imtlate the bUlldmg permit applicatIOn Please advIse at your earlIest convemence the status of our extensIOn request ou have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 262-522-8990 e~ elerleber wo ~~~r!~~~llrJ-~~' , r SEP I 32005 ,Jd)\ I L __ ~- --- __J II PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF CLEARWATER Enclosure RIVERWOOD CORPORATE CENTER N19 W24130 RIVERWOOD DR, SUITE 100 WAUKESHA, WISCONSIN 53188 TELEPHONE · (262) · 522 . 8990 FAX · (262) · 522 . 8999 4' CITY OF CLEARWATER loNG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMEl'IT REvIEW PlANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FWRlOA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUllD1NG, 100 SmITH MYR'ru: AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FWRlOA 33756 TELEPHONF (727) 562-4567 FAX (J27) 562-4576 September 28,2004 Mr Jeff Kelerleber Decade Properttes Inc N19W24130 Rtverwood Dove, # 100 Waukesha, WI 53188 10-13-04 Copies to: Steve Charl1e M~ke R1Ck G~llett RE Development Order - Case FT-.D2004-04026 - 850 Bayway Boulevard -FYI- Dear Mr Kelerleber This letter constItutes a Development Order pursuant to SectIOn 4-206D 6 of the Cornmu01ty Development Code On September 21,2004, the CommunIty Development Board reviewed your FleXible Development applicatton of a mIxed use development for 13 multI-famIly reSIdentIal umts and SIX hotel umts with a reductlOn of the front (south) setback, along Bayway Boulevard, from 15 feet to 603 feet (to pavement), and a bmldmg heIght mcrease from 35 feet to 49 feet from base flood elevatIOn (plus roof appurtenances), as a Comprehensive Infrll Redevelopment ProJect, under the provIsIOns of SectlOn 2-803 C for the SIte at 850 Bayway Bouelvard Based on the applIcation and the Staff recommendatIOn, the Cornmumty Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the applrcatIOn WIth the followmg bases and condItIons Bases for Approval 1 The proposal comphes wIth the FleXIble Development cntena as a Comprehensive Inflll Redevelopment Project per SectIOn 2-803 C 2 The proposal IS m comphance WIth other standards m the Code Inc1udmg the General A pp 11 ca bIll ty Cn ten a per SectIOn 3 -913 3 The development IS compattble WIth the surroundmg area and WIll enhance other redevelopment efforts ConditIOns of Approval 1 That the fmal deSIgn and color of the bUlldmg be conSIstent WIth the conceptual elevatIOns submitted to, or as modIfIed by, the CDB, 2 That all FIre Department requIrements be met pnor to the issuance of any buildmg permits, 3 That the NatIOnal FIre PtotectlOn ASSOCiatIon (NFPA) 303 standards for "mannas and boat yards" be met to the satIsfactIOn of the FIre Department pnor to the Issuance of any bUlldmg pemllts, 4 That all Parks and Rec~eatlOn fees be paId pnor to the Issuance of any bUlldmg perrruts, BRIAN) AUNGST, MAYOR COMMISSIONER HoYT HAMILTON, VICE !V,^YOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMIS~IONER ~RANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONFR * BIll JONSON, COMMI,SIONIoR "EQUAL EMPLOYMFNT AND ArFIRMA11V1o ACTION EMP] OYFR" \ ,. " September 28, 2004 Jeff Kelerleber, Page Two 5 That dumpster serVIce WIth the CIty of Clearwater be arranged pnor to butldmg pernnt Issuance, 6 That the ImgatlOn plan sheet be revIsed to the satIsfactIOn of CIty Planrung Staff, pnor to any butldmg pernnt Issuance, 7 That all storm water, water, and sewer desIgn standards of the Engmeenng Department be met pnor bUildIng penrut Issuance, 8 TraffIc Impact fees are to be determIned and paid pnar to CerttfIcate of Occupancy, 9 That the condorrunIum plat be recorded pnor to the Issuance of the first CertIfIcate of Occupancy, 10 That boats moored at the docks be for the exclUSIve use by the reSIdents and/or guests of the condomImums and not be penrutted to be sub-leased separately from the cOndOmInIUmS, 11 That covered boat hfts be prohIbIted (uncovered boat lIfts may be revIewed at an admmIstratIve level proVIded that all requuements of SectIon 3-601 are met), 12 That all applIcable reqUirements of Chapter 39 of the BUIldmg Code be met related to seawall setbacks, 13 That floatmg and dock-supported slgnage be permanently mstalled contammg wordmg warnIng boaters of the eXistence of protected sea grasses and manatees In the vlclmty, and 14 That the monument SIgn be llIruted to SIX feet In heIght and be conSIstent WIth the archItecture and color of the butldmg Pursuant to SectIon 4-407, an applicatIon for a butldmg pemut shall be made wItlun one year of fleXIble Development approval (by September 21, 2005) All reqUIred certifIcates of occupancy shall be obtamed wItlun one year of the date of Issuance of the butldmg penrut TIme frames do not change WIth succeSSIve owners The CommunIty Development CoordInator may grant an extenSIOn of tlIne for a penod not to exceed one year and only wIthm the ongmal penod of validity The Commumty Development Board may approve one additIOnal extenSIOn of tIme after the Commumty Development Coordmator's extenSIOn to InItiate a bUlldmg penrut applIcatIon ' The Issuance of th15 Development Ordel does not relteve you of the neceSSIty to obtam any bUIldmg permIts or pay any Impact fee:;, that may be rcquued In order to facIlttate the Issuance of any pefD1Jt 01 hcense affected by thlS applOval, please bnng a copy of thiS Jetter WIth you when applymg for any permits or ltcenses that requue thlS pnor development approval Addll1onally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexlble Dcvelopment) may be InItIated pursuant to SectIOn 4-502 B by the appltcant or by any person grantcd party status wlthm 14 days of the date of the Commumty Development Board meetmg The f11mg of aD appltcattonJnotIce of appeal shall stay the effect of the deClSIOn pendmg the fmal determmatlOn of the case The appeal penod for your case expues on October 5,2004 ~ '. ~ " " Septeml?er 28, ~904 Jeff Ke1erleber, Page Three _ If you have any questIons, please do not hesItate to call MIchael H Reynolds, AlCP, Planner ill, at 727-562-4836 You can access zonmg InfOrmatIOn for parcels wlthm the CIty through our webSIte' www clearwater-fl com Cyntma H Tarapam, AICP PlanOlng DIrector S \Planning DepGrlmenflC D !J\FLl;XI!natllVe or FinIshed Appl,ealwns\Bayway 850 Almmar IT) 9 21 04 CDB - ApprovelilBayway 850 Dcvclopmenr Order September 28, 2004 doc 09/07/05 17 13 DECRDf ~ 7275624576 NO 047 (il01 ," ERTIES . , Via Facsimile and US Mail 727-562-4576 4 pages riD ~mmow~ rml lillr~[l'-O ~ 20nsllJUI I ....- ---~-- _.___J I I.lE....clv... -:',.11, ) N E I ( r; 8 0 Ii " , r, ~ f ~ II I ;-.' I Cll'i'(J~ -O'f r-, I --"'" ------ - ............. --................--... ~-- Mr Michael Re)TIolds Mr Michael Delk Clty of Clearwater Planmog Department Mumcipal SelVlces Buildmg 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 RE Case FLD2004-04026 - 850 Ba}Way Boulevard Dear Mr Reynolds and Mr Delk pursuant to the Development Order Crom the City of Clearwater dated September 28,2004, an application for a bUlldmg pennit must be made Within one year of FlexIble Development approval, wluch 15 September 21, 2005 The purpose of thiS letter IS to request from the Conunumty Development CoordInator a one-year extension to un:b.ate the bUIlding permIt apphcatu:m. Please adVIse at your earhest convemence the status of our extension request 1 ou have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 262~522-8990 e~ elerleber Enclosure , RIVEFlWOOD CORPORATE CENTER NUl W24130 RIVERWOOD DA SUITE 100 wAuKESHA, WISCONSIN 531 BB TELEPHONE · (282) · 522 · 8990 FAX. (262) · 522 · 8999 09/07/05 17 13 DECRDE ~ 7275624575 NO 047 (il02 CITY OF CLEARWATER Lo~G RM'OE PlANNING DMLOPMENT REVIEW PlANNING DEPARTMENT POST DPPle!! Box 47481 ClBARWATEll, FWlUDA 33758-4748 MUNloPAL SbRVlCES BUILDING, 100 $OUIH M't'lm.Ii AVllNUE, Cl.EARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TEl.EJ>HONE (727) 5624567 FAX (127) 562-4576 September 28, 2004 Mr. Jeff Keierleber Decade Propemes lnc N19W24 1 30 Rlverwood Dnve, # 100 Waukesha, WI 53188 10-13-04 Copies to: Steve Charlie Mike Rick Gillett RE Development Order - Case FLD2004-04026 - 850 Bayway Boulevard -FYI- Dear Mr Kelerleber. ThIs letter consututes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206D.6 of the Commumty Development Code On September 21, 2004, the Commumty Development Board reviewed your FleXIble Development apphcanon of a Inlxed use development for 13 multl-fanuly residential uruts and SIX hotel units WIth a reduction of the front (south) setback, .alcng Bayway Boulevard, from 15 feet to 6.03 feet (to pavement). and a bUlldmg heIght Increase from 35 feet to 49 feet from base flood elevation (plus roof appurtenances), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment ProJect, under the provIsions of SectIon 2-803 C. for the site at 850 Bayway Bouelvard Based on the application and the Staff recommendation, the Commumty Development Board (COB) APPROVED the appl1catlon With the followmg bases and conditions' Bases for Aooroval 1 The proposal complies WIth the FlexIble Development cnteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Secnon 2-803,C. 2 The proposal is in compltance with other standards In the Code includIng the General Appl.1cabIlity Cntena per Section 3.913 3 The development IS compatible wnh the surroundmg area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts Conmtlons of Approval. 1, That the final deSIgn and color of the bUlldmg be consIstent WIth the conceptual elevatlons subIDItted to, or as modifIed by, the COB, 2 That all FIre Department :requirements be roet pnor to the Issuance of any btilld1Jlg permIts, 3 That the NatIonal Fire ProtectIOn ASSociation (NFPA) 303 standards for "mannas and boatyards" be met to the satisfactton of the fire Department pnor to the Issuance of any bulldmg permits, 4. That all Parks and RecreatIon fees be piUd pnor to the Issuance of any bUlldmg penruts, lllWVl J AUNGST, M^YOR COMMISSIONER Hol"T H/,MllTOr<, VICE ~YOll.COM.M1SSIOl"ER WHITlIIIOY GllAY, CO'v\MrS~IONE~ f'RANK HlBBAll'1, CoMMISSIONER $ BIU Jtl/l,~aN, COMMI~SIONtll "EQUAl EM PLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTlOi'J EMPl OYl!Il" 09/07/05 17 13 DECRDE, ~ 7275624576 NO 047 [;103 September 28,2004 Jeff Keierleber, Page Two 5 That dumpster SCfYlce with the CIty of Clearwater be arranged pnor to building permit Issuance, 6. That the trrigation plan sheet be revised to the :satisfaction of Clty Planmng Staff, pnor to any bmldlng permtt Issuance, 7. That all storm water, water, and sewer deSign standards of the Engtneering Department be met pnor bullchng permit issuance; 8. Traffic unpact fees are to be deternuned and paid pnor to Certificate of Occupancy; 9. That the condomimum plat be recorded pnor to the issuance of the fIrst Certificate of Occupancy, 10 That boats moored at the docks be for the excluslve use by the reSIdents and/or guests of the condorrunmffiS and not be peIID.1tted to be sub-leased separately from the condonnmums; 11 That covered boat bfts be prohIbIted (uncovered boat lIfts may be reviewed at an adm'nlslranve level provided that all requirements of Secbon 3-601 are met), 12 That all apphcable requrrements of Chapter 39 of the Bwlding Code be met related to seawall setbacks, 13. That floatIng and dock-supponed signage be permanently lOstalled contalDlDg wording warning boaters of the eXlstence of protected sea grasses and manatees in the vlclmty; and 14 That the monument SIgn be l1rmted to SIX feet m height and be consistent WIth the architecture and color of the bUIldIng. Pursuant to SeetJon 4-407, an apphcatIon for a building perout shall be made wltlun one year of FleXlble Development approval (by September 21, 2ooS) All reqUIred certificates of occupancy shall be obtained wltlun one year of the date of Issuance of the bUIldIng peIID.1t TIme frames do not change Wlth successive owners The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extenSIon of tIme for a penod not to exceed one year and only wltlun the origmal period of vahdtty. The Community Development Board may approve one addItIonal extensIOn of tune after the Commumty Development Coordinator's extenSIOn to ImtJate a bwldmg permIt apphcal.lOn , The issuance of this Development Order does not relIeve you of the neceSSIty to obtain any building pernuts Or pay any Impact fees that may be reqUlIed, In order to faclhtate the lS$uanCe of any pernut or license affected by this approval! please bring a copy of thIS letter Wlth you when applymg. for any penmts or l1.censes that require thus pnor development approval Add1tlonally. an appeal of a Level Two approval (FleXIble Development) may be 1I'11rtared pursuanl [0 Sectlon 4-502 B by the aflphcant or by any person granted party status wlthm 14 days of the date of the Commumty Development Board meeting The filtng of an applIcatIon/notIce of appeal shall stay the effect of the deCISion pending the final detenrunat10n of the case. The appeal penod for your case expIres on October 5,2004. 09/07/05 17 13 DECRDE 7 7275624576 NO 047 [;104 . ~ ,. "'r.... ~ September 28, 2004 Jeff K.eierleber. Page Three If you have any quesbons, please do not hesItate to call Michael H Reynolds, AICP. Plarmer m. at 727-562-4836 You can access zomng mfonnabon for parcels withm the City through our website: wwwclearwater-fl com. Cynthia H. Taraparu, AICP Planmng DlIector \ S \,PWlIllllg DdjJlU1IIltllr.c D WLEX\lllacllve (lr Hnrsl1c/'l AppllcatllJ1l.l\Bayway 8S0 Aim/liar (T) 9 Z1 04 COB - ApproverNJaywo)' eso PevelnpmMI Order Seplember 2B, 2004 doc ~, ,\ if ~~O/JgUUDQ ~ ll~~ f\LOF r/{(;r.". \~ ~':I""~11 ~7~ \~~~itf~1 Jo4"~r~";. :!h l \ II .-J:J.,~'=:. ,~~ ""~".....' .....1r\f-"n..,... ~ l:!_ ~-,~ - ---,_'l .... "" -- ::$ """~1Il 11::' =~'-- "'-.. ~. Q ~~~ ~- - "*'~: ..~~....::::::::::. ,,~~ "';,.-i(IA~'-J"")~'Vt.\' -q.......~TEt\,JlI.' '14d/J1 / CITY OF CLEARWATER loNG RANGE PlANNiNG DEVaOPMF" 1 RFVlEW PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFHCF Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758.-.11.48-:;; ~~ MUNICIPAL SFRVICES BUll DING, 100 SOUTH MYRTI.E AVFNUc, CI F.ARw;,TfR, FLORlOA 33756 THfPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 September 28, 2004 Mr Jeff KeJerleber Decade PropertIes Inc N19W24130 RIverwood Dnve, # 100 Waukesha, WI 53188 RE Development Order - Case FLD2004-04026 - 850 Bayway Boulevard Dear Mr. KeIerleber ThIS letter constttutes a Development Order pursuant to Sectton 4-206D 6 of the Commumty Development Code On September 21,2004, the Commumty Development Board revIewed your Flexible Development applIcatton of a mixed use development for 13 multt-fatruly resIdenttal umts and SIX hotel umts with a reductIOn of the front (south) setback, along Bayway Boulevard, from 15 feet to 6 03 feet (to pavement), and a buIldmg heIght Increase from 35 feet to 49 feet from base flood elevatlOn (plus roof appurtenances), as a ComprehensIVe InfIll Redevelopment Project, under the provISIons of SectlOn 2-803.C. for the SIte at 850 Bayway Bouelvard Based on the applIcatlOn and the Staff recommendatlOn, the Commumty Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the applIcatlOll wIth the folloWIng bases and conrntlOlls Bases for Approval 1 The proposal complIes wIth the FlexIble Development cntena as a ComprehensIve lofdl Redevelopment Project per Sectlon 2-803 C 2 The proposal IS In comphance with other standards In the Code Includmg the General ApphcabllIty Cntena per SectIon 3-913 3 The development IS compattble With the surroundmg area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts CondIttons of Approval 1 That the fmal deSIgn and color of the bUIldIng be consIstent With the conceptual elevatIOns submItted to, or as modIfIed by, the CDB, 2 That all FIre Department reqUIrements be met pnor to the Issuance of any bUIldIng permIts, 3 That the NatIOnal Fire Protectton AssocIatIOn (NFPA) 303 standards for "mannas and boat yards" be met to the satIsfactIOn of the FIfe Department pnor to the Issuance of any bUIldmg perr11lts, 4 That all Parks and RecreatIon fees be patd pnor to the Issuance of any bUlldmg permIts, BRIAN J AUNGST, MAYOR (()MMI,SION~R HOYT HAMil TON, V1CF 1\1tWOR CO\\MI~SIONFR WIIIl NFl' GilAI', CO\IMIS,IO"1 II r R.\NK IllllBARD, GOMW~SIONFR * Bill JONSON, CO~l~lI\'IO~1 II "FQU\I EMPIOYMfNI AND AI HRMA1IVI ACllON rMI'IOnR" j September 28,2004 Jeff Kelerleber, Page Two 5 That dumpster service wIth the CIty of Clearwater be arranged pnor to bUIldmg penmt Issuance, 6 That the ImgatlOn plan sheet be revIsed to the satIsfactIon of CIty Planmng Staff, pnor to any bmldmg permIt issuance; 7 That all storm water, water, and sewer design standards of the Engmeenng Department be met poor bmldmg permit Issuance, 8 Traffic Impact fees are to be detenruned and patd poor to CertIficate of Occupancy, 9 That the condonumum plat be recorded poor to the Issuance of the fIrst CertifIcate of Occupancy; 10 That boats moored at the docks be for the exclUSIVe use by the resIdents and/or guests of the condonumums and not be penmtted to be sub-leased separately from the cOndOmIniUmS, 11. That covered boat hfts be 'prohibIted (uncovered boat hfts may be reviewed at an admmIstratIve level provIded that all reqUIrements of SectlOn 3-601 are met), 12 That all applIcable requlfements of Chapter 39 of the BUIldmg Code be met related to seawall setbacks, 13 That floatIng and dock-supported slgnage be permanently mstalled contammg wordmg wammg boaters of the eXistence of protected sea grasses and manatees m the vlclmty, and 14 That the monument Sign be lImIted to SIX feet m heIght and be conSistent WIth the architecture and color of the bmldmg Pursuant to SectIon 4-407, an apphcatlOn for a bmldmg penmt shall be made wlthm one year of FleXible Development approval (by September 21, 2005) All reqUired certIfIcates of occupancy shall be obtamed wlthm one year of the date of Issuance of the bmldmg permit TIme frames do not change With succeSSIve owners The Commumty Development Coordmator may grant an extensIon of tIme for a penod not to exceed one year and only wIthm the ongmal penod of valIdIty The Commumty Development Board may approve one adilltlOnal extensIon of tIme after the Commumty Development Coorillnator's extensIOn to mIuate a bmldmg penmt applIcatIOn The Issuance of thiS Development Order does not relIeve you of the necessity to obtam any bmldmg penmts or pay any Impact fees that may be reqUired In order to faCIlItate the Issuance of any penrut or hcense affected by thIS approval, please bnng a copy of thiS letter With you when applymg for any penruts or hcenses that reqUire thIS pnor development approval AdditIOnally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (FleXible Development) may be lmtIated pursuant to SectIOn 4-502 B by the apphcant or by any person granted party status wIthm 14 days of the date of the Commumty Development Board meetmg The fllmg of an applIcatIOn/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decIslOn pendmg the fmal detenrunation of the case TheDappeal penod for your case expires on October 5,2004 ~ \ 1,1 September 28,2004 Jeff Kelerleber, Page Three If you have any questIons, please do not hesitate to call MIchael H Reynolds, AICP, Planner ill, at 727-562-4836 You can access zomng mforrnatlOn for parcels wlthm the CIty through our webslte WWW c1earwater-fl com CynthIa H Tarapam, AICP Planmng Director S \Plannmg Department.C D iJlFLEXVnacllve or Fllllslwd ApphcaflOns\Bayway 850 Almmar (T) 92104 CDB - Approved\Bayway 850 Development Order September 28, 2004 doc I, I \ / P U(J{lITDQ~;7 ~~~~~OrilfJ";;q ft.'~~\ ~1~,~,.,,;,.~rj,7~"I!!iIL '\"t~..,.t ........?~~ "q~,,' II, -~~ """ t;~~~~~ "'~~-~~< i:<::::!l:", ..I!:;;';. ~ "'- ,\:Qt) ..". ~ ~ ~="'- ~~I:, -~";.-~- ,,~.....:, ~~~-"#....n""~~~\\ -......iJ11E~,~lfl -u.og/JJJ CITY OF CLEARWATER lONG RANGF PlANNING DEVFLOPMIcNT RFVlEW PlANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CI LARWATFR, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVlcrs BUilDING, 100 SOUTH MYRnF AVENUE, CLEARWAlER, FLORIDA 33756 TW:PIlO1>.lE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 September 28, 2004 Mr Jeff Keterleber Decade Properties Inc N19W24130 Rlverwood Dnve, # 100 Waukesha, WI 53188 f RE. Development Order - Case FLD2004-04026 - 850 Bayway Boulevard Dear Mr Kelerleber This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to SectIOn 4-206D 6 of the Commull1ty Development Code On September 21,2004, the Commull1ty Development Board revIewed your flexible Development applIcatIon of a rruxed use development for 13 multl-farruly resIdentIal umts and SIX hotel umts wIth a reductIon of the front (south) setback, along Bayway Boulevard, from 15 feet to 603 feet (to pavement), and a bmldmg height mcrease from 35 feet to 49 feet from base flood elevatIon (plus roof appurtenances), as a ComprehensIVe InfIll Redevelopment Project; under the proVIsIOns of SectIOn 2~803 C. for the site at 850 Bayway Bouelvard. Based on the applicatIOn and the Staff recommendatIOn, the Commumty Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the applicatIOn With the followmg bases and condlttons 'll" Bases for Approval 1 The proposal complIes With the flexIble Development cntena as a Comprehensive Inflll Redevelopment Project per SectIOn 2-803 C 2 The proposal IS m complIance WIth other standards m the Code IncludIng the General ApplIcability Cntena per Section 3-913 3 The development IS compatIble WIth the surroundmg area and wIll enhance other redevelopment efforts ConditIOns of Approval 1 That the fmal design and color of the bmldmg be conSistent WIth the conceptual elevatIOns submitted to, or as modIfied by, the CDB, 2 That all Fife Department requuements be met pnor to the Issuance of any bUIldmg permIts, 3 That the NatIOnal Fue ProtectIOn AssocIatIOn (NFPA) 303 standards for "mannas and boat yards" be met to the satisfactIOn of the FlIe Department pnor to the Issuance of any bmldmg permIts, 4 That all Parks and RecreatIOn fees be paId pnor to the Issuance of any bUIldmg permits, BRI \N J f\UNGST, MA l'OI~ Cm.1MIY,]ONfR HOiT HAM I I TON, VICE 1It.\ l'OR-COMMI~SIONr R WI t1] Nfl' G RA), CO\l,\IIS~IO~ I R rKANK HlHlIARD, COMM]~SIONCI{ * BII] JONSON, CO\IMI"IOr>rR "r QUAI FMPI OYMrN I I\ND Ar~ IRMA 11VI Ac 1 ION n IPI OYr]{" . ( , '. September 28,2004 Jeff KeIerleber, Page Two 5 That dumpster serVIce WIth the CIty of Clearwater be arranged pnor to bmldmg permIt Issuance, 6 That the ImgatlOn plan sheet be revised to the satlsfactlOn of CIty Plannmg Staff, pnor to any bmldmg penmt Issuance, 7 That all storm water, water, and sewer deSIgn standards of the Engmeenng Department be met pnor bmldmg perrrut Issuance, 8 Traffic Impact fees are to be deterrruned and paId pnor to CertIfIcate of Occupancy, 9 That the condorrumum plat be recorded pnor to the Issuance of the fIrst CertIficate of Occupancy, 10 That boats moored at the docks be for the exclusIVe use by the residents and/or guests of the condommlUms and not be perrmtted to be sub-leased separately from the condommlUms, 11 That covered boat hfts be prohIbIted (uncovered boat bfts may be revIewed at an admmIstratIve level prOVIded that all reqUIrements of SectIon 3-601 are met), 12 That all applIcable reqUIrements of Chapter 39 of the BUlldlOg Code be met related to seawall setbacks, 13 That floatmg and dock-supported slgnage be permanently mstaIled contammg wordmg warmng boaters of the eXistence of protected sea grasses and manatees III the vlcmIty, and 14 That the monument SIgn be lImIted to SIX feet III heIght and be conSIstent With the archItecture and color of the bmldmg Pursuant to SectlOn 4-407, an apphcatlOn for a bUlldmg penmt shall be made wIthm one year of FleXIble Development approval (by September 21, 2005) All reqUired certIficates of occupancy shall be obtaIlled wIthm one year of the date of Issuance of the bmldmg pemut Time frames do not change With succeSSIve owners The Commumty Development Coordmator may grant an extenSIOn of time for a penod not to exceed one year and only wlthm the ongmal penod of vahdlty The Commumty Development Board may approve one addItional extenSIOn of time after the Commumty Development Coordmator's extensIOn to ImtIate a bUlldmg permIt apphcatIOn The Issuance of thiS Development Order does not reheve you of the necessity to obtam any bUlldmg permIts or pay any Impact fees that may be requIred In order to faclhtate the Issuance of any penrut or hcense affected by thiS approval, please bnng a copy of thiS letter WIth you when applymg for any penruts or hcenses that reqUIre thIS pnor development approval Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (FleXIble Development) may be mltIated pursuant to SectlOn 4-502 B by the applIcant or by any person granted party status wlthm 14 days of the date of the Commumty Development Board meetmg The fIlIng of an applIcatIOn/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the deCISIon pendmg the fmal determmatIon of the case The appeal penod for your case expIres on October 5,2004 1\ ~ ~ September 28,2004 Jeff Kelerleber, Page Three If you have any questIOns, please do not heSItate to call Michael H Reynolds, AlCP, Planner III, at 727-562-4836 You can access zomng mformatIon for parcels wIthm the CIty through our webslte www clearwater-fl com Cynthia H Tarapam, AICP Plannmg DIrector S \Plannmg DepartmenflC D lJIFLEXVnaclIve or Fmlshed App/lcatlOns\Bayway 850 Almmar (T) 9 21 04 CDB - ApprovuN3ayway 850 Development Order SepIemba 28, 2004 doc / ) ... r!afllTblT9, ~~~~t!M.OrilJ.I' "'u.... ",'~;A ~ ,,"UI',~~X.,. ~~""..IJ~ ~~....~..~~~ "l't~,",\II/ \ ""~ q ,....~- \ . ... "'~~ ~ -,,--~~ S~lll ...~-=,,- .:::::-rlll ..".: '1:. --=""- L'l:"1/i ~~";.-~-- ,.,~,:~ 'C\'J. ~""'~-j' '\ ~ If. '_10'" '('Jl -.,....)1TE~t,lf' .(r-4.;gJl' CITY OF CLEARWATER LONG RAJ\GIc PLANNING DrvF! OPMENT RFV1EW PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OfFICE Box 4748, CLFARWHER, FlORIDA 33758-4748 MUN1CiPJ\L SrRVlCEo. BUJI.DING, 100 SOUTH MYRliE A vlcNur, CtEARW A TFR, FLORIDA 33756 TaEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 September 28,2004 Mr Jeff Kelerleber Decade PropertIes Inc N19W24130 Rlverwood Dnve, # 100 VVaukesha, VVI53188 RE Development Order - Case FLD2004-04026 - 850 Bayway Boulevard Dear Mr. Keterleber ThiS letter constItutes a Development Order pursuant to SectIOn 4-206D 6 of the Commumty Development Code. On September 21,2004, the CommunIty Development Board revIewed your FleXIble Development apphcatIon of a rruxed use development for 13 multl-farmly resIdentIal umts and SIX hotel umts WIth a reductIon of the front (south) setback, along Bayway Boulevard, from 15 feet to 6 03 feet (to pavement), and a buildmg height mcrease from 35 feet to 49 feet from base flood elevatIOn (plus roof appurtenances), as a ComprehensIve Inftll Redevelopment ProJect, under the provlSlons of SectIon 2-803 C for the Site at 850 Bayway Bouelvard Based on the applIcatIOn and the Staff recommendatIon, the CommuOIty Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the applIcatIOn with the followmg bases and condItIOns Bases for Approval 1 The proposal complIes wlth the FleXIble Development cntena as a ComprehenSIve InflJ1 Redevelopment Project per SectIOn 2-803 C 2 The proposal IS m compliance wIth other standards m the Code mcludmg the General Apphcablhty Cntena per SectIOn 3-913 3 The development IS compatIble wIth the surroundmg ared and WIll enhance other redevelopment efforts ConditIOns of Approval 1 That the fmal desIgn and color of the bUIldmg be conSIstent WIth the conceptual elevatIOns submItted to, or as modified by, the CDB, 2 That all FIre Department reqUIrements be met pnor to the Issuance of any bUIldmg permIts, 3 That the NatIOnal Fire ProtectIOn ASSOCIatIOn (NFP A) 303 standards for "mannas and boat yards" be met to the satIsfaction of the FIre Department pnor to the Issuance of any bUIldmg permits, 4 That all Parks and RecreatIOn fees be paid pnor to the Issuance of any bUIldmg perrOlts, BRIAN J AUNGST, MA10R-COMMI,SIONrR HoYT l-L\J1t11 TON, VTet MA)OR.C()MMI~SIONFR WHI1MY GRAY GO\I.\lIs,IONrR FRANK HIIJTJrlRIJ, CO\lt1l1~SIONER * Bill JONSON CO~I~II~"Or-1 R 'TQUAI l:<.MPI OYMI NT AND A! I IllM \l lvr Ac T TON L\lI'IOYI R" . September 28,2004 Jeff Kelerleber, Page Two 5 That dumpster service wIth the CIty of Clearwater be arranged pnor to bmldmg permit Issuance, 6 That the ImgatIon plan sheet be revised to the satIsfactIOn of CIty Planmng Staff, pnor to any bUIldmg penmt Issuance, 7 That all storm water, water, and sewer desIgn standards of the Engmeenng Department be met pnor bmldmg permIt Issuance, 8. TraffIc Impact fees are to be detenmned and patd pnor to Certificate of Occupancy, 9. That the condommmm plat be recorded pnor to the Issuance of the first CertIfIcate of Occupancy, 10 That boats moored at the docks be for the exclusIVe use by the resIdents and/or guests of the condommmms and not be permltted to be sub-leased separately from the condommmms; 11. That covered boat lIfts be prohIbIted (uncovered boat lIfts may be revIewed at an adrmmstratIVe level provIded that all reqUirements of SectJon 3-601 are met). 12 That all applicable reqUIrements of Chapter 39 of the BUIldmg Code be met related to seawall setbacks. 13. That floatmg and dock-supported slgnage be permanently mstalled contammg wordmg warnmg boaters of the eXIstence of protected sea grasses and manatees m the vIcImty, and 14 That the monument Sign be lInuted to SIX feet m heIght and be conSIstent with the archItecture and color of the bmldmg Pursuant to SectIOn 4-407, an apphcatJon for a bUIldmg peIffilt shall be made wlthm one year of FlexIble Development approval (by September 21,2005) All reqUIred certificates of occupancy shall be obtamed wIthm one year of the date of Issuance of the bUlldmg permIt. TIme frames do not change with successive owners The Commumty Development Coordmator may grant an extensIOn of tIme for a penod not to exceed one year and only wlthm the ongmal penod of valIdity The Commumty Development Board may approve one addIllonal extenSIOn of tIme after the CommuOlty Development Coordmator's extensIOn to mlllate a bUlldmg perrmt apphcatlOn The Issuance of thIS Development Order does not relIeve you of the necessIty to obtam any bUlldmg permits or pay any Impact fees that may be requued. In order to faCilitate the Issuance of any permIt or lIcense affected by thiS approval, please bnng a copy of thIS letter WIth you when applymg for any permits or lIcenses that reqUire thiS pnor development approval AdditIOnally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (FleXIble Development) may be Imttated pursuant to SectJon 4-502 B by the applIcant or by any person granted party status wIthm 14 days of the date of the Commumty Development Board meetmg. The fIlmg of an applIcatlOnlnotlce of appeal shall stay the effect of the deCISIon pendmg the fInal determmatlOn of the case The appeal penod for your case expires on October 5,2004 .. September 28,2004 Jeff KeIerleber, Page Three If you have any questIOns, please do not hesItate to call MIchael H. Reynolds, AICP, Planner ill, at 727-562-4836 You can access zomng mformatlon for parcels wlthm the CIty through our webslte' www clearwater-fl com CynthIa H Tarapam, AICP Planmng DIrector S \Planmng DepartmenflC D EfIFLEJNnactIVe or FinIshed Appllca/lOniIBayway 850 Almmar (f) 921 04 CDS - ApprovetN3ayway 850 Developmem Order September 28, 2004 doc ,< ( CDB Meetmg Date Case Number Agenda Item Owner Applicant! Representative Address .; ORIGINAL September 21. 2004 FLD2004-04026 F4 Decade PropertIes Inc Jeff Kelerleber 850 Bayway Boulevard CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: FleXIble Development approval of a mixed use development for J 3 multi-farrnly residentIal umts and SIX hotel UnIts WIth a reductlOn of the front (south) setback, along Bayway Boulevard, from 15 feet to 603 feet (to pavement), and a bmldmg height Increase from 35 feet to 49 feet from base flood elevatlOn (plus roof appurtenances), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the proVlslons of SectlOn 2-803 C EXISTING ZONINGILAND USE: Tounst (T) Dlstnct, Resort Facdlties High (RFH) PROPERTY SIZE: PROPERTY USE: 066 acres, 28,904 square feet Current Use Hotel Proposed Use Mixed use multi-famIly resIdential and hotel ADJACENT ZONING/LAND USES: North Preservation Dlstnct (P), Clearwater Harbor East High Density ReSIdentIal (HDR), Multt-famdy reSIdential South High Density ReSidential (fIDR), Multi-famdy residential West Tounst Dlstnct (T), Multi-family residential CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY: MultJ-fanuly residentIal uses dommate the surrounding area ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 0 66-acre overall SIte IS located on the north side of Bayway Boulevard, approximately 600 feet east of the mtersectton of Gulf Boulevard On the site Itself is an eXIstlOg hotel, Charthouse SUites, on Clearwater Bay StafIReport - Commwuty Development Board - September 21, 2004 ~ Case FLD2004-04026 ~ Page I ~ I ( I Proposal: The applicant IS proposmg 13 attached uruts and SIX hotel sUites Wlthm a 49-foot lugh buIlding The maxImum densIty for tlus site IS 19 dwellmg umts or 26 hotel rooms The proposed front setback reductIOn and buIlding heIght Increase are necessary m order to fit the proposed mIxed use of multi-fanuly resIdentIaJ umts and hotel units on this sIte There IS only one setback reductIOn requested and It IS mmor (6 03 feet to back of curb at the front of the site) considenng that the setback to bUIldmg is 20 21 feet The Development ReVIew Comnuttee (ORC) can consider building height deviatIOns up to 50 feet The apphcatlon IS before the Commumty Development Board as a ffi1xed use ComprehensIve Infill Redevelopment Project applIcatIOn Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstandmg enforcement Issues associated With this site STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: (Section 2~801.1 and 2-802): STANDARD PROPOSED CONSISTENT lNCONSISTENT MAXlMUM 13 attached umts and SIX hotel rooms X DENSfIT (maximum of 19 dwelling units or 26 hotel rooms) IMPERVIOUS 057 X SURFACE RA TIO (ISR) (maximum ISR is .95) LOT AREA (10,000 o 66acres, 28,904 square feet X square feet is minimum requirement) LOT WIDTH (100 120 feet X feet minimum required) FRONT SETBACK 603 feet at closest pomt (to X* (15 feet minimum pavement) required) REAR SETBACK (20 20 feet X feet minimum requirement) SIDE SETBACK (10 West lO feet (to pavement) X feet . . East 20 feet (to pavement) mlDlmum requirement) HEIGHT (35 ~ 100 49 feet from BFE X* feet allowable FLD ranee) PARKING SPACES 30 spaces, 1 8 spaces per unit (multi- X (27 per unit required) fannly) and 1 space per unit (hotel) * See anaJysIs above for discussion Staff Report - Commumty Development Board - September 21, 2004 ~ Case FLD2004-Q4026 - Page 2 COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA (Sections 2-803.C): Consistent Inconsistent 1 The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for X development IS otheTWlse Impractical without deVIatIons from the use, IntensIty and development standards 2 The development of the parcel proposed for development as a X Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project wIll not reduce the fmr market value of abuttmg properties 3 The uses Wlthm the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are X otheTWlse penrntted in the City of Clearwater 4 The use or mix of uses WIthin the Comprehensive rntill Redevelopment X ProJect IS compatible WIth adjacent land uses 5 The development of the parcel proposed for development, as a X ComprehensIve Infill Redevelopment Project Will upgrade the lTIllTIedlate VlClmty of the parcel proposed for development 6 The desIgn of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment X Project creates a form and functIOn that enhances the commumty character of the lTIllTIedIate viCInity of the parcel proposed for development and the CIty of Clearwater as a whole 7 Flexibility III regard to lot Width, reqUired setbacks, height and o:lf- X street parkIng are JustIfied by the benefits to commumty character and the Illunedtate Vlclmty of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole 8 Adequate off-street parkmg III the immediate Vlcimty according to the X shared parkIng formula III DiviSIOn 14 of Article 3 WIll be avatlable to aVOId on-street parkmg III the munedtate Vlclmty of the parcel proposed for development Staff Report - Commwnty Development Board - September 21, 2004 - Case FLD2004-04026 - Page 3 : ,J I COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS Section 3-913 : Consistent Inconsistent 1 X 2 X 3 X 4 X 5 of the X 6 X SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development ReVIew Cormruttee reVIewed the applicatIon and supporting materials at its meeting on August 18, 2004 The Planmng Department recommends APPROV AL of the FleXlble Development apphcatIon of a mIxed use development for 13 multi-famIly reSIdential umts and SIX hotel umts with a reduction of the front (south) setback:, along Bayway Boulevard, from 15 feet to 603 feet (to pavement), and a buildmg heIght mcrease from 35 feet to 49 feet from base tIood elevatIOn (plus roof appurtenances), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisIOns of Section 2-803 C WIth the following bases and conditIons Bases for Approval 1 The proposal complies with the FleXlble Development criteria as a Comprehensive Intill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-803 C 2 The proposal IS 10 comphance WIth other standards In the Code mcludIng the General Apphcabulty Cntena per Section 3-913 3 The development IS compatIble With the surroundmg area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts ConditIons of Approval 1 That the final deSign and color of the building be conSistent With the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modrlied by, the CDB, 2 That all FIre Department reqUIfements be met pnor to the issuance of any budding permIts, 3 That the National Flfe Protection ASSOCiation (NFPA) 303 standards for "mannas and boatyards" be met to the satlsfactlOn of the Fire Department pnor to the Issuance of any buddmg penruts, 4 That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid poor to the Issuance of any budding perrmts, 5 That dumpster sefVlce With the CIty of Clearwater be arranged prior to buildmg perrmt Issuance, 6 That the Imgatlon plan sheet be reVIsed to the satisfaction of City Planmng Staff, pnor to any buddmg penrut Issuance, 7 That all storm water, water, and sewer deSign standards of the Engmeenng Department be met pnor buildmg permit Issuance, Staff Report - CommUIllty Development Board - September 21, 2004 . Case FLD2004-04026 - Page 4 \ I 8 Traffic Impact fees are to be detemuned and paId pnor to Certificate of Occupancy, 9 That the condonumum plat be recorded pnor to the issuance of the first CertIficate of 10 Occupancy, 11 That boats moored at the docks be for the excluslve use by the residents and/or guests of the condonumums and not be pemutted to be sub-leased separately from the condonurnums, 12 That covered boat lIfts be prohIbited (uncovered boat lifts may be reVIewed at an adOllnIstrative level provided that all reqwrements of Section 3 -60 1 are met), 13 That all apphcable reqUirements of Chapter 39 of the Budding Code be met related to seawall setbacks, 14 That floatmg and dock-supported sIgnage be permanently Installed contwmng wordmg warnmg boaters of the eXIstence of protected sea grasses and manatees m the vlclmty, and 15 That the monument SIgn be linuted to SIX feet m heIght and be consistent With the archItecture and color of the buddIng Prepared by Planrnng Department Staff /hl.~~.~ MIchael H Reynolds, AICP, Planner ill ATT ACHMENTS Aenal Photograph of Site and Viciruty Location Map Future Land Use Map Zomng Atlas Map ApphcatlOn S \Planning Department\C D B\FLEXIPendlng caseslUp for the next CDBIBayway 850 Almmar (I') 9 2] 04 CDBIBayway 850 Almmar Staff Repon doc Staff Report - Conunumty Development Board - September 21, 2004 - Case FLD2004.04026 - Page 5 9:25 am Case Number FLD2004-040.w ~~ 850 BA YW A Y aL VD Applicant Decdde Propertle<; Inc N19 W24130 Rlvcrwood Dr#IOO Wauke~hd, WI 53188 TELEPHONE No Phone, fAX No Fax, E-MAIL No Emm] Jeff Kelerlcbcr 240 BaY~ldc Dnve C1canvater, Fl 33767 TELEPHONE 727-46 I -2921 FAX 262-522-8999, E-MAIL No Emdlj Owner(s) Location, North sIde of Bayway Boulevard approxm1atcJy 600 feet CdSt of the mtersectlon of Gulf Boulevard AtIa~ Page 285B .lomng District. T, Tounst Request, ComprehensIve Infill Redevelopment Approval for 13 dttdehed resldentldl umts and SIX sUItes (mIxed u<;e development) wIth a bUlldmg heIght of 49 feet (above the FEMA Ime) plu<; roof appurtunences, and a front setbdck rcduetlOn from 15 feet to 603 feet (to pavement) Proposed Use' MIxed u<;c Neighborhood Clearwater Pomt AssociatlOn(s) TELEPHONE No Phone, FAX No Fax, E-MAIL No Email Neighborhood Clearwater Bcach AssocJatlOn(s): TELEPHONE No Phone, FAX No Fax, E-MAIL No Emall Presenter: MIke Reynolds, Semor Planner Attendees Included' ChIp Gerlock, MIke Reynolds, Scott RIce, RIck Albee, Joseph Colbert The DRe reviewed thiS applicatIOn With the followmg comments, General Engmeermg, No Comments Environmental, No Comments Fire: Development ReView Agenda - Wedne~ddY, Augu<;t 18,2004 - Page 3 rlre Department ConnectIOns <;h,111 be Identified by a <;Ign that state~ ,~o Park11lg, Fire Department Conneel1on" and shall be deSigned m accordance with Honda Department of TramporlatlOn stand,lf(\:;. for mfom1atlon slgtMge and be mamtamed With a durance of 7 Y2 fcelm front of and to the sldc<, ofapphance A~ per Flonda FIre PreventIon Code 2001 EditIOn, modificatIOn to Secllon 3-5 6 ofNFPA 1 Please acknowledge mlent 10 comply PRIOR TO BLDG PERM[T 7/21/04 J _ C Aeknow] edge tlMt thl s WI 1 I be done 2 Fm: Alarm System mstallatlOn mu'lt be m accordance With NFP A 72 1999 EditIOn by a heemed Fire Alarm Contractor under separate plan" and permIt PRIOR TO BLDG PERMIT 7/21/04 J _ C Aeknowl edgc that thiS WI] 1 be done 3 ProVide drawmg:;. that have been prepared by or under the direction of an Engmeer regIstered under Chapter 471 Flonda Statutes for the Fire A]arm System as per Flonda BUlldmg Code 200 I Edltton, SectIOn 1044 1 3 (5) Drawmgs shall be signed and scaled by a Profe:;':;'lonal Engmeer as per 471 025 F]onda Statutes PRIOR TO BLDG PERM[T 7/2 1/04 J ~ C Acknow]edge that thl s WIll be done Engmeers SIgned and sealed drawmgs must be a pari of the constructIOn documents 4 ProVIde drawmgs that have been prepared by or under the dIrectIon of an Engmeer registered under F S Chapter 471 for all fire spnnkler systems as per F]onda BUl]dmg Code, 2001 EditIOn, Sec 1044 I 3 Drawmgs shall be sIgned and sealed by a Profe'l'llOna] Engmeer as per F S 471 025 The mstallatlon shal I be m accordance WIth NFP A 13, 1999 Edltton by a hcensed FIre Sprmkler Contractor under separate permIt WIth drawmgs Please dcknow]edge PRIOR TO BLDG PERMIT 7/21/04 J _ C Acknowledge that thl:;' WIll be done 1 he Engmeer<; signed and :;.ealed p ]ans must be a part of the constructIOn documents 5 ProVIde portable Fire ExtmgU1shers hsted for Cla<;s ^, Class B and Class C fires that meet the reqUIrements of NFP A 10, must be mstalled at the pler/]and mtersectlOn AddltlOna] FIre Extmgwshers mllst be placed on the dock so that the maximum travel dIstance to an Extmgw<;her does not exceed 75 feet As per NFP A 303, FIre ProtectIon Standard for Mannas and 130atyards, SectIOn 4 2 2 1 6 All requuements ofNFPA 303, Fue ProtectIOn Standard for Mannas and BoatYdrds must be met PRIOR TO SLOG PERM]T 7/21/04 J _ C Aeknow]edge thcl.t thl S WI II be done 7 ProVide a Stdndplpe water supply WIth 2 ]/2 mch connectIOn & I 1/2 mch adaptor WIth breakable cover and cham wlthm 100 feet of any pIer/land mterscctlOn As per NFP A 303, Fue ProtectIOn Standdrd for Mannas and Soatyards, SectJon 4 3 4 PRIOR 10 CDB 7/21/04 J C Not shown wlthm 100 feet of both docks 8 Cloud all reVISIOns 7/2]/04 J ~ C The reVised p]dn was 'lubmllled Without any c10udmg Future submIttal reVISIons must be clouded, PLEASE 9 Plan:;. <;ubmltted for Fire ReView must reflect adherence to Flonda Fife PreventIOn Code 2001 EditIOn and the followmg Codes N F PAlO I , 2000 EditIOn, N F P A 70, 1999 Ed ltl on and Flonda Stdtute 633 Show on a Code Reference Sheet 7/21/04 J _ C Flonda Fire PreventIOn Code must be referenced m the apphcable code~ hst ] 0 ***PLEASE NOTE*** REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE AUTHOR [TY 1-1 A VING JURISDICTION SHALL NOT RELEIVE THE APPLlCAN r OF THE RESPONSIBILITY OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE 2001 EDITION Harbor Master No Comment~ Legal. No Comments Land Resources. 7/27/04- Reduce the Sl ze of retentIOn pond "A" to preserve the Pme trees, en large retention pond "8" to recover the ]o:;.t volume 5/24/04-[f a water qualtty pond IS to be lIlstalled, recommend placlllg It at the east Side of the bUlldmg to aVOid the pme trec~ dt the west SIde See reVIsed comment above La ndscapl ng' 1 IrngatIOn must meet the CIty Code per SectIOn 3-1203 C, submit plans pnor to CD8 to ~how 100% coverage, ram sen<;or, automcltlc tImer, etc Development ReVIew Agendcl - Wednesday, August 18, 2004 - Page 4 Parks and RecreatIOn' Open Spdce and RecreatIOn I mpaet Fees drc due prior to I ~~ll.ln(.e of bUIlding peml1b Please contact Deb RIchter at 72 7-562-48 I 7 Storm water' No Comments Sohd Waste ] Thd I dumpster service be arr dnged wIth the Solid W d&te Department pn or to the lssuan(.c of an occupational hcense or certlficdte of occupancy Please contact Tom Glenn - 727-562-4930 7/26/04 Dump~ter" and recycling bins wIll be rollcd out by condo maintenance employees Traffic Engmeermg: No Comments Planmng I 2 3 Color building elevatIOn", With dmlenslOns show from BFE to roofmldpomt (use dimensIOnal arrows) need to be proVIded for ea(.h elevatIOn Label the elevatIOn for each "hect ConsIder ehmmatmg the request for a front ~etback reductIon The sIte plan ,;how& bUlldmg heIght at 48 fcet from BFE to roof mIdpoint The applicatIOn fonn states the heIght to be 49 feet Please corrcct whichever amount IS m error How wIll parkmg bc dC&lgnated, as there IS one short for the hotel portiOn? ProVIde color elcvdtlOns, all four sldc,;, for thiS proposal How WIll parkmg functIon for the hotel versus the condommlUm~? How I" the ';He dccessed for the hotel and condommlUm usc~? 4 5 6 7 Other, No Commcnts Notes ThiS applicatIOn IS sufficlcnt There are some outstandmg I&sues that are expectcd to be addressed through plan revIsIon by August 19,2004 Other Issues are to be dddres&ed by deadlInes per ';t.lff comments Development RevlCw Agenda - Wedne&ddY, August 18,2004 - Page 5 t .. 2:45 pm C.be Number FLD2004-04\.._! -- 850 SA YW A Y SL VD l' .- 2 .- (jY Apphunt Decade Propertle<; IIlC N19 W24130 Rlvervvood Dr # 100 Wauke<;ha, WI 53 188 TELCPHONE No Phone FAX No r ax, E-MAIL No Enldll Jeft Kelerlcber 240 Bayslde Dnve Clearwater, FI 33767 TCLEPHONE 727-46 I -2921, FAX 262-522-8999, E-MAIL No Emal] Owner(s) LocatIOn North <;Ide of E3aywdY Boulevard, approx1t11ately 600 feet east of the IntersectIOn of Gulf Boulevard Atlas Page: 285B 7.Allllng DIstriCt. T, Tounst Req u est' Comprehen <;1 vc I nfi 1 I RcdcvelopmCllt Approval for 15 dttaehcd resldenttal umts and <;lX <;UI tc::, (m Ixed use development) wIth a buddIng hClght of 90 feGt (above the FFMA lme) plus roof appurtuncnees Proposed Use' MIxed u<;c Neighborhood No NClghborhood A~~ocatlon Data AssoclatlOn(s)' Presenter. MIke Reynol d<;, Se1l1 or P IdIlner Attendee~ Induded The DRe reviewed thl<; applicatIOn with the folIowlIIg comments General EngIneering I I) Need to show stagmg area for dumpster 2) Quelng space for egres<; 1<; only 20 fl: , how docs the gate operate? 3) Necd to core eXlstmg sal11tary sewer manhole for sewer connectIOn 4) The eXIsting water Il1d1n shown 011 Sheets 3 dnd 6 of 10 IS 6" not 5" dIameter 5) Need to connect proposed fire hydrant, fire lme serVIce, etc to the eXIsting 6" water mdm 6) Show tappmg sleeve and vdlve note at eXI~tmg malIl tdp 7) What dre fire hIle and hydrant connectmg to? 8) Where do guc<;t<, pdrk-' All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB Pnor to C 0 1) Need to reGQrd thc condommum plat wIth Pmellas County EnVIronmental See Stormwater Comment~ Fire Development ReVIew Agenda - Thur<;day, August 12 2004 - Page 9 ***PLEASE NO, _ ** REV]EW AND APPROVAL BY I HF AL tORI I Y HA V]NG JURISD]CTlON SHALL NO r RELEIVE THE APPLICANT OF THE RESPONSIBILITY OF COMPLIANCE W]TH THE FLORIDA HRE PREVCN] ION CODE 2001 Eon ION 2 Plan~ suhnntted for F]re RevIew must reflect ddheruKc 10 flonda r]Te PreventIOn Code 2001 Ed]tlOn and the following Codes N FP A 101 2000 Ed]t]on Nrp A 70, 1999 Edlllon <md rlonda Statute 633 Show on a Code Reference Shcel 7/2]/04 J~C Flondd Fire PreventIon Code mu~t be referenced III the dPphcdble code~ h~t 3 Provide drdwlllgs Ihdt have been prepared by or under the dIrectIOn of an Engineer regl~tered under F S Chdpter 471 for all fire ~pnnkler systems as per F]onda Bll1ldll1g Code, 200] EditIon, Sec 1044 1 3 Drdwlllg~ ~hall be ~Igned and <;ealell by a Profe<;<;lonal Engll1eer a~ per F S 471 025 The lI1~tdllatlOn shall be In accordance with NFl' A ]J, ] 999 Ed]tlOn by a hcen<;ed Fue Spnnk]er Contractor under Sepdrdte permit with drdwlngs Please acknowledge PRIOR TO BLDG PERMIT 7/2 1/04 J ~ C Ac k now1cdge t ha t thl <; W] 11 be done The Engmeer<; sIgned and <;ealed p Ian <; mu~t be ,I pdrt of the constructlOIl document<; 4 ProvIde drdwlllg,> thdt have been prepared by or under the dIrectIOn of an Engmeer reg]<;tered under Chapter 471 Flonda Statutes for the Fire Alarm System as per F]onda Bw]dmg Code 2001 Ed]tlOn, SectIon 1044 ] 3 (5) Drawings shall be sIgned and sealed by a ProfessIOnal Engmeer as per 471 025 Flonda Statutes PRIOR [0 BLOG PERM] I 7/2 1/04 J _ C Acknowledge Ihdt th]~ W]]] be done Engllleer<, ~]gned and sed led drdwlIlgs must bed part of the con<,truct]on dOUlment~ 5 Fife Alarm System II1stdl]atlOn musl be III accorddnce wIth NFl' A 72, 1999 EditIon by a hcen<;ed F]re Alaml Contractor under separate plans and permIt PRIOR TO I3LDG PERMIT 7/21/04 J _ C Acknow]edge that thl s WI] I be done 6 FIre Depdrtme nt ConnectIOns shd 11 be Idenllfied by d ."lgn thdt stdtes "N 0 Park IIlg, FIre DE-pdrtment ComK{,!]on" and ,>ha]] be designed In accordance wIth F]onda Dtp<ll1ment of Tran<;portdt]on ~tandard~ for II1formallOn slgnage and be mamtallled w]lh d clearance of 7 'Ii feet In front of and to the sIdes of applldnce As per f londa Fue PreventIOn Code, 200] EdltlOn, modIficatIOn to SectIOn 3-5 6 of N FP A] Please acknowledge mten! to comply PRIOR TO BLDG PERMIT 7/21/04 J _ C Acknow] edge tha t III I s W] II be done 7 Cloud ,Ill reV]~lOns 7/21/04 J_C The revI<;ed plan was submItted wIthout any c10udmg Future <;ubmltta] reV]<;lon<; mu<;t be clouded, PLEASE 8 ProvIde a Stdndp]pe wdter supply with 2 1/2 IIlch connectIOn & 1 1/2 mch addplor with breakable cover and chdm wlthm 100 feet ufany plCrI]and IIlter~ectlOn A<, per NFPA 301, F]re ProtecllOn Slandard for Mannas and Boat yards, SectIOn 4 3 4 PRIOR TO CDB 7/21/04 J C Not shown w]thlll 100 feet of both docks 9 All requuements of NFl' A 303, FIre ProtectIOn Standard for Mannas and Boat yards must be met PRIOR TO BLDG PERM] r 7/2 1/04 J ~ C Acknowledge thdt t]ll <; W]] 1 be done 10 ProvIde portable Fue ExtmgUlshers l1~ted for CldS~ A, Class B and Class C fires thaI meet the reqUirement" of NFl' A 10, must be mstaIJed at the pIer/land 1I1terseetlOn Add]tlOnal Fae EXlmgUlshers must be placed on the dock so that the maX1l1lUffi travel dIstance to an ExtlllgUl,>her doc,> not exceed 75 feet A<; per NFpA 303, Fue ProteGtlOn Stdndard for MaTllldS and Boat yards, SectIOn 4 2 2 1 Harbor Master No Comment." Leg.11 No Comments Land Resources 7/27104-Reduce the SIze of retentIon pond "A" 10 pre<;erve the Pine tree<;, enlarge relent IOn pond "8" to recover the lo~t volumc 5/24/04-If a water qualtty pond IS to be mstdlled recommend p]acmg It at the east SIde of the bUlldmg to dvold the pille tree') at the west SIde See revl<;ed comment above Landscaping Development RcvlCw Agendd - Thursday, Augu<;t 12,2004 - pdgC 10 The color site pt" .,nd elevatIOn drdwmg", depict a lush landscape ...~~Ign, where the ~ubmllted landscdpe pldn 1<; much less eldbordtc Thcre dre hmlted pldnt", on ~hect 9 of I 0 Revl~c Clther to mdtch the other maklllg Ihun wnslstenl, preferdbly mdtch thc plan 10 the rendcrlng For a project of this Il1dgllltude the lush landscapll1g will only ddd to the curb appcdl dnd value of the UflltS Submit pnor 10 or at DRC meGtmg 2 Per ScGtlOn 3-1204 D dll Idnd<;cdpmg must be protected from vellluddr and pedestndn tr.dlic by Ihe mstalldtlOn of curbll1g dnd wheel stops, or other protcctlvc dcv]ee~ along the penmeler of any landscapmg which adJoln<; veh]culdr use arCd", dnd s]dewalk<; These protective dcvlCe<; <;hall have a mlIllmurn height of SIX Inches dbove gr.Ide 3 ImgatlOIl must meet the City Code per SectIOn 3-1203 C, ~ubm]t plam pnor to CDB to show 100% coverdge, ralll <;ensor automatIc tJrner, etc 4 Per Sect] on 3-1202 E 1 Code req U] res a ml III mum of 10% Inten or green <;pace of gross ve hi CU I dr u ~e a rca or 12% of gross veh I cuIdr u ~e drea 1/ Pdrk] ng "paces a rea gre.Iter th.IIl 1 I 0% of the requITed parklllg InKnor ]<;Iands <;hall be designed so that Il1 mo~t C.I<'C~ no more than 10 parkmg spaces are prOVIded m a row Intenor ]slands shdll be .I m]llImum of 150 <;q ft, and be 8' of green ",pacL from back of curb to back of curb ** fhe pdrkmg ]S under the bUlldlllg (ll1temal) dnd 1<; therefore exempt from this reqUlrcmLllt The plan IIldICdK<; I 1% mteTlor landscdPlllg? Could not find on plan Remove the" r ntenor Land",c.Ipc CalculatIOns" proVided from the pldn Pdrks and Recreahon. Open Space and RccreatlOn Impact Fees are due pTlor to 1~~Udnce ofbuddmg permits I'led~e contact Deb Richter .It 727-562-4817 Storm\\' a ter. I The sIte ]S cxcmpt from storm water attenuatIOn and only ha<; to provide water quality retention Pnor to CDB thIS area ~hould be "hown on the <;Ite plan MET 2 Pnor to blllldmg peTlmt a copy of the approved SWFWMD peomt IS to be prOVided Solid Waste I That dumpster SCrvlCC be arranged With the Solid Waste Department pTlor to the Issuance of an occupdtlOnal hcense or certificate ofoccupdncy Pkd<,e wnt.Ict Tom Glenn - 727-562-4930 7/26/04 Dumpsters and recycl mg b m", W] II be rolled out by condo mallltena nce cmp I oyce<; Traffic EnglllecTlng. I I Reduce curb cut<; from 3 (three) to 2 (two) to comply with the mlll]mUm spaclllg reqUlrement<; of ] 25' between dTlvew.IY~ (Section 3-102 C 3) 2 Show locatIOn for gate console ]f any Place console where a passenger car can access 1I without havlllg any part of thc vehIcle llltrudlllg on Ihe through sldewdlk dnd espeCially the roadway 3 Provldc dn .Ic"c.ss]ble path from bUilding's entrance to d public Sidewalk (Flondd Accc<;<;]b]hty Code for Butldmg Con<;tructlOn Chapter I I SectIOn I 1-4 3 2) 4 ObJect~ w]thm the sight distance tTlangle", must not cxcced 30" m heIght from the pavement Remove parklllg space de~lgnatcd a~ a loadmg zone which wIll prcvcnt vehIcle from backlllg out blllldly mto the thrOdt ofthe dnveway 5 A II of the above to be addre<;sed pnor to CD B Traffic Impact Fee to be determmed and paid prior 10 CO 2 I Show dlmens]on<; on <;Ite plan for tYPical reguldr dnd dl<,.Iblcd parkmg spdce dho dnvc al<;1c Widths ((Commulllty Development Code SectIOn 3-1402 parkll1g chart) 2 Include current City of Clcdrwater d]<;ablcd parkmg space and {hsabkd <;]gn detaIl 3 Turnl ng rdd]u<, m<;]de garage must be able to accommodate a car tummg comers without gomg over the other lane or bdckmg up 4 Garage support", such as wall<; must not lmpdlr drIver's "'Ight VI<,lb]!tty when backmg out of parklllg space (Commulllty Development Code SectIOn 3-1402) Re-deslgn walls ",uch that the driver can ~ee when backlllg out (see Belle Harbor) 5 Parklllg garage Il1U~t have a vert]cal clearcmce of8'2" per Chapterl I Flond.I BllIldlllg Accc<;<;lbIl]ty Code, ScctlOn 1 1-4 6 5 6 All of the above to be addre<;<;ed pnorto C DB Planlllng Development RevH,w Agenda - Thursday, August 12,2004 - Page I I _6 Need narrative stah..",ent of e.omphance with Beach by Design Appllcdnt needs 10 fill out ComprehensIve lnfill Redevtlopment apphcatlOn fonn StdlL the. proposed slgnage Any ~lgndgc wIll necd to follow Code dnd bt- lIltegrdted to the <;Hc and buI1dlllg ~ Comb111e the pldn ~et~ to onc plan <;ct W SubmIt a traffic study or get SIgn off from Engmeenng On Ihe applIcation form, c1cdrly <;ldtC dny and all reasons lor Ihe Comprehcn<'lve Infill Redevelopment reque~t What doe<; not meet code? 7 Site Plan vf The scale oftht:;. proJcct IS too bIg (too high and too Wide) ~RevI<;e the mdex sheel after d~~embly to one plan set ~Nced color landscape plan 4 Dcmohtlon Plan and SIte Pl,m need 10 show clear bllIldmg footprlllts 5 Dlmen~lOn out all setback<; mcludmg 10 pdvement 6 Improve the 10CdtlO11 map 7 Idcntl fy dll cnvlronmentally ullIque Jred~ 8 LocdlC all ea<;ements 9 Locate/label all utIli tl es, me.! udmg hydrants 10 Solod wdste drCdS necd to be shown (label) I I Label all outdoor hghtll1g v'12 Propo':oc ~Idewalks and dmlenslon lhem V'11 Label all setbacks With dllncn~lOnal arrows 8 Orgamze plan notes to one sIte ddtd tdble 9 SIte Ddta T dble / I State the reqUIred number ofparkmg spdce:;. 2 Stdte OffiGld1 Records Book and Pdge Number<; for al1 utilIty easements 3 BUlldmg heIght needs to be stdted from BFE to mldpoIllt of the roof both wlthm the slle data table and on the bUlldmg c1cvahom LA ~ 10 Color bUlldmg elevdtlOn:;., wtth dimenSIOns show from BFE to roof mldpomt (use (hmen~londl arrows) need to be proVIded for each elevdtlon Label the elevatIon for edch shect Other. No Comments Note~. Development ReVIew Agcnda - Thursday, August 12, 2004 - Page 12 'It CITY OF CLEAR\VATER NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN r BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS The Community Development Board of the CIty of Clearwater Flonda, wIll hold public heJrlngs on Tuesday, September 21, 2004 begmnmg at 2 00 pin, In the Cll y Counul Cham bu<;, In Ci ty Ha 11, 3 rei fl oor, 1 12 South Osceola Avenue, Clearwater FIonda, to consider the followmg requcst<; NOTE All persons wlshm!!: to addres<; an Item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meetml! Those cases that are not contested by the applicant, staff, nell!hbonne. property owner<;, etc will be pIaccd on d consent al!cnda and approved by a sml!le vote at the bel!mnml! of the meetml! I Antomos Markopoulos. T M Mel!as and KoIossos Inn, Inc are reque<,tmg a reconSideratIOn of the case at October 19, 2004 CDS meetmg for the only purpose of attachmg condItIOns of approval [Proposed Use: Hotel of 350 room<; (12778 rooms/acre on total SIte), 75 attaGhed dwellings (27 38 umts/acrc on total ~Ite) and a maxImum of37,000 <;q ft (0 31 FAR on total site) of amemlle<; accessory to the hotel, at d height of ISO ft (to roof deck) With an JddltlOnal 5 ft for penmeter parapet~ (from roof deck) and an additIOnal 33 ft for elevator, staIr, mechalllcal room<;/archltectural embelhshments (from roof deck)] at 100 Coronado Dr. & 201,215 and 219 South Gulf view Blvd, Lloyd-Whltc-Skmner Sub, Lob 44-55,90-100, 102, part of Lot 56 & 101. and Columbia Sub, Blk A, Lot I 1<1.,02004-02013 2 Vlrl!lnJa B. Franks IS reque<;tmg a FleXIble Development dpproval to develop 4 reSIdential dttached dwellmg umts on a 6,479 sq ft lot (10,000 sq ft IS reqUIred), WIth a mllllmum lot WIdth of 60 ft (100 ft IS required), a reductIOn m the front setbdck from 15ft to 5 69 ft to pavement, a reductIOn m the Side (south) setback from 10 ft to 4 ft (to extenor staus) a reductIOn of the Side (north) setback from 10 ft to 672ft (to bUlldmg), a reductIOn of the rear setback from 20 ft to 10 ft to wooden deck, and a bUlldmg heIght mcrease from 35 ft to 51 83 ft from FEMA to roofmldpomt under the prOVISIOns of SectIOn 2-803 B (Proposed Use Attached dwelhngs) dt 669 Bay Esplanade, Mandd],lY Umt No 5 Replat, Blk 77, Lot 8 F I., 02004-03018 3 Bne.htwater Pomt, LLC IS requestmg a fleXible Development to p<..rmlt a multi-use dock, under the proVISIOns of SectJon 3-601 (Proposed Use: Construct 2 multI-use docb of2,478 ~q ft for ]4 shps) at 205, 209 and 214 BrJ2htwater !!.!:.-, BaY~lde Sub No 2, Lots 27, 28 & 29 FLD2004-06046 4 1504 Garden Inc. I., requestmg a FleXible Development approval to permit retdll sales wlthm an eXlstmg two-story commerCIal bUlldmg With d reductIOn to lot ared from 10,000 sq ft to 7,720 sq ft, a reductIOn to lot Width (west) from 100 ft. to 50 8 I ft., reductIons to the front (north) setback from 25 ft to 19ft (to eXlstlllg dnd proposed bUlldmg) dnd from 25 ft to 14 ft (to propo~ed pavement), a reductIOn to the front (west) setbdck from 25 ft to 15ft (to proposed pavement), reductIOns to the SIde (~outh) setback from 10 ft to I ft (to eXlstmg and proposed bUlldmg) dnd from 10 ft to zero ft (to proposed pavement) and a reductIOn to reqUIred parkmg from 5 to 45 spaces per 1,000 "q ft, as a ComprehenSIve fnfill Redevelopment ProJect, under the prOVISIOns of SectIOn 2-704 C, and a reductIOn to the land.,cape buffer along the south property Illle from 5 ft to zero ft and a reductIOn III the Width of the reqUlred foundatIOn landscapll1g adjacent to the bUlIdmg (west <;lde) from 5 ft to 3 75 ft., a<; part of a ComprehenSIve Landscape Program, under the prOVISIOns of Section 3-1202 G (Proposed Use RetaJi sales and servICes) at 503 Marshall St. E A Marshall's Sub, Lot 10 & W Vi- of vae alley on E FLD2004-02010 5 MIF Investments 1m:. IS requestlllg iI FleXIble Dcvelopment approvdl to permIt a medical office wlthm an eXlstmg 2- story 3,575 sq ft commerc131 bUl]dlllg WIth a proposed one-story 896 sq ft bUlldmg additIOn, WIth reductIOns to the front (west) setback from 25 ft to 4 ft (to pavement) dnd 23 ft (to bUlldmg), the front (<;outh) setback from 25 ft to 3 ft (to pavement) and 5 ft (to bUlldmg), and a reductIOn of parklOg space~ from 18 requued spaces to 13 parkmg spaces, d~ d Comprehen"lve Infill Redevelopment ProJect, under the provISIons of SectIOn 2-704 C, and as part of a ComprehenSIve Ldndscape Program, under the proVISIOns of Section 3- 1202 G (Proposed Use MedIcal office) at 921 S. Mllosoun Ave.. McVeIgh Sub 1st Add, Blk D, Lot 8 and dll ofvac alley on E FLD2004-03016 6 ecade Pro ertles Inc. 1<; requesl1ng a Flexible Development dpproval of a MIxed Use development for 13 multl-famJiy re~ (:Ientlal umts and 6 hotel umts WIth d reducllon of the front (south) setback from 15 ft to 603 ft (to pavement), dnu a t1dl11g heIght mcrease from 35 ft to 49 ft from FEMA (plus roof appurtenances), a~ a ComprehenSIve Infill Redevelopment ProJect, under the provlslOn~ of SectIOn 2-803 C (Proposed Use Mulh-fdmlly resldGlltlal and overnIght accommodatIOns) at 850 Baywav Blvd, BJY<;lde Sub No 6 Umt A, Blk 0, Lot 12 and BaY<;lde Sub No 6 Umt C, Blk D, lots 13, 14 & 15 FLD2004-04026 7 David L & Kathleen A Jave, TRI< drc requcstll1g d flexIble Development dpproval to construct a 3 bdY ~c1f-servlct, J- Cdr wash, wIth reduGtlOns to the front (north) ~etback from 25 ft to 8 ft to the dumpster cnclo~U1 c, from 25 ft to 24 It to bUlldmg a reductIOn from the front (east) <,ctback from 25 ft to 20 ft to bmldmg, d reouctlon from the ~HJe (we~t) setback from lOft to 5 ft to the freestrindrng VdGllUITI dred and from lOft 109ft to pavemGnl, and d reductIOn to the reqmred parklllg space" from 7 to 3 SpriGCS, as pMt of d Compn_hcnslve Land<,cape Program, under the provlslons of SectIOn 3- I 202 G (Propused Use Car wdsh) at 1410 Beth' Ln , Stcven~on's Helghts, Blk A, Lot 27 FLD2004-04032 8 Qualltv Boab Inc. & Clearwater Manne Aquarium, Ine are requestmg .I FleXIble Developmcnt approval to permIt 31 attdchcd resldcnt131 UnIts with a front (north) setback of 66ft (to pavement) and 26 12 ft (to bUlldmg), a sIde (east) setbdck of 22 75 ft (to bUlldmg), a rear (south) setback of 20 ft (to pool and cdbana) and 53 56 ft to bUlldlllg, and a side (we~t) setback of zero ft (to pdvement) and 22 74 ft (to bulldmg), dnd a bUlldmg height of 85 ft from Base Flood ElevatIOn to mldpomt of the roof, as pdrt of a ComprehensIve Infill Redevelopment ProJcct, under the provI~lOns of Secttons 2-704 C (Proposed Use' Multi-family resldentldl) at 279 Wllldward Passa\?:e, Island E~tates of Clearwater Umt 5, Blk C, W 50' of Lot<, I and 4 and all of Lots 5, 6, 7 and 8 FLD2004~06042 Jntere~ted pdrtlCS may appear and be heard at the heanngs or file wntten notlcc of approval or obJcetlOn WIth the Planmng DIrector or City Clerk pnor to the heanng~ Any person who dccldes to appeal any deCISIon madc by the BOdrd, WIth re~peet to any matter con~ldered at such heanngs, Will need to request and obtam party status by the Board durmg the case diSCUSSIon, a record of the proceedmgs and, for <,uch purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedmgs is made, whIch record mcludcs the testJmony and eVidence upon wrnch the appedl IS to be based per Flonda Statute 2860105 Commumty Development Code SectIOn 4-206 state~ that party status ~hall be granted by the BOdrd If person reque~tmg such demonstrates that s/he IS sub~tanttally affected Party status entItIes pdrtles to personally testifY, pre~cnt eVIdence, argument dnd Wltne<;ses, cross-examme Witnesses, appeal the decIsIOn and spedk on recon<;lderatlon requests An oath Will be admlDlstered swcanng all partlclpant~ m pubhc heanng cases If you WIsh to :;.peak please walt to be recogmzed, then state and spell your name and proVide your address Per<,ons spe<lkmg before the CDS shall be limited to three mmutc~ unle~~ an mdlvldualls representmg a group m which edse the Chalrper~on may authonze a reasonable dmount ofttme up to 10 mmute<, FIve days pnor to the meetmg, staff reports and recommendatlOn~ on the dbove requests will be aV31ldbIe for revIew by mtere:;.tcd partle~ between the hours of 8 30 a m and 4 30 pm, weekdays, at the CIty of CIearwdter, Plannmg Department, 100 S Myrtle Ave, Clearwdter, FL 33756 Please contact Frank Gerlock, Development RevlCw Manager, at 562-4557 to discuss any questlOn~ or conccrns about the project and/or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan ThiS notICe WdS sent by the OffiCial Records and LegislatIve ServIces Department, CynthIa E Goudeau, CMC, City Clerk Lisa FIerce Pldnmng Department Cynthm E Goudeau, CMC CIty Clerk CIty of Clearwater POBox 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 NOTE Appltcant or repre<;entattve must be present <It the hcanng YOU ARE BEING SENT THIS NOTICE IF YOU ARE THE APPLICANT OR OWN PROPERTY WITHIN 200 FT OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY A COpy OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN THE OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES DEPT. ANY PERSON WITH A DlSABILl1 Y REOUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL THE OFFICIAL RECORDS ANn LEGISLATIVE SERVICES DEPT WITH THEIR REQUEST AT (727) 562-4090 Ad 09/05/04 t ') .. Cynd] TJ.rapam Plannmg Dlfector Cynthle] E Goudeau, CMC CIty Clerk City of Clearwater POBox 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 YOU ARE BEING SENT THIS NOTICE IF YOU ARE THE APPLICANT OR OWN PROPERTY WITHIN 200 FT OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY A COpy OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN THE OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLA'I rVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL THE OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLA TlVE SERVICES DEr ARTMEN I WITH eM EIR REQUEST AT (727) 562-4090 Ad 09/05104 ~ Community Response Team Planning Dept. Cases - ORe Case No.rLDdCO '-(- 0 YOeJ c:... Meeting Date: t //0/0 V Location: 6..."0 , ~/ /J k/ '-' / ,'2,/ J o Current Use: CJ;.J//r/ /krJ'v Llr' ~ o Active Code Enforcement Case @ yes o Address number ~ (no) (vacant land) o Landscaping~ (no) o Overgrown (yes) <r!9:) o Debris (yes) ~ o Inoperative vehicle(s) (yes) (a o Building(s) (~ (fair) (poor) (vacant land) o Fencing (none) (g@?} (dIlapidated) (broken and/or missing pieces) o Paint ~ (fair) (poor) (gansh) o Grass Parking (yes) ~ o Residential Parking Violations (yes) ~ o Signage (none) ~not ok) (billboard) o Parking (n/a) (~(handlcapped) (needs repaving) o Dumpster~ (not enclosed) o Outdoor storage (yes) ~ Comments/Status Report (attach any pertinent documents)' Date -.5:1 tj Il.l Reviewed Revised 03-29-01,02-04-03 Telephone Sc.-~ - V ).~) 9:25 am Case Number' F1.D2004-0402:o -- 850 BA YW A Y BLVD Applicant Decade Properties Inc NI9 W24130 Rlverwood Dr #100 Waukesha,VVl53188 TELEPHONE No Phone, FAX No Fax, E-MAll.. No Emall Jeff Kelerleber 240 Bayslde Dnve Clearwater, Fl 33767 TELEPHONE 727-461-2921, FAX 262-522-8999, E-MAIL No Em811 /' ~ Owner(s): LocatIOn' North side of Bayway Boulevard, approximately 600 feet east of the mtersectlon of Gulf Boulevard Atlas Page: 285B Zonmg District' T, Tounst Request: Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Approval for 13 attached residential umts and SIX sUites (mixed use development) With a blllldmg height of49 feet (above the FEMA hne) plus roofappurtunences, and a front setback reductIOn from 15 feet to 6 03 feet (to pavement) Proposed Use: Mixed use Neighborhood Clearwater Pomt AssoclatlOn(s): TELEPHONE No Phone, FAX No Fax, E-MAIL No Em811 Neighborhood Clearwater Beach Association (s): TELEPHONE No Phone, FAX No Fax, E-MAIL No Ematl Presenter: Mike Reynolds, Selllor Planner Attendees Included: Chip Gerlock, Mike Reynolds, Scott Rice, Rick Albee, Joseph Colbert The DRe reviewed this applicabon with the foDowing comments: General Engineering: 1 1) Need to show stagmg area for dumpster 2) Quemg space for egress IS only 20 ft , how does the gate operate? 3) Need to core eXlstmg samtary sewer manhole for sewer connectlon 4) The eXlstmg water malO shown on Sheets 3 and 6 of 10 IS 6" not 5" diameter 5) Need to connect proposed fire hydrant, fire hne serVice, ete to the eXlstmg 6" water mam 6) Show tappmg sleeve and valve note at eXlstmg mam tap 7) What are fire hne and hydrant connectmg to? 8) Where do guests park? All of the above to be addressed pnor to CDB Pnor to C 0 I) Need to record the condommum plat With PmelIas County EnVironmental: 1 See Stormwater Comments Fire: Development ReView Agenda - Wednesday, August 18,2004 - Page 4 " ./ Fire Department ConnectIOns shall be Identified by a sign that states .<10 Parking, Fire Department ConnectiOn" and shaH be designed In accordance with Flonda Department of Transportation standards for information Slgnage and be maIntamed with a clearance of 7!n feet In front of and to the Sides of appliance As per Flonda Fire PreventIOn Code, 2001 &l1tlOn, modificatIOn to SectIOn 3-5 6 of NFPA I Please acknowledge Intent to comply PRIOR TO BLDG PERMIT 7/21/04 J_C Acknowledge that thiS will be done 2 Fire Alarm System installation must be m accordance with NFPA 72,1999 Edition by a licensed Fire Alarm Contractor under separate plans and permit PRIOR TO BLDG PERMIT 7/21/04 J_C Acknowledge that this will be done 3 Provide drawings that have been prepared by or under the directIOn of an EngIneer registered under Chapter 471 Flonda Statutes for the Fire Alarm System as per Flonda B UlldIng Code 2001 E<htlon, SectIOn 104 4 1 3 (5) DrawIngs shall be signed and sealed by a ProfeSSIOnal Engineer as per 471025 Flonda Statutes PRIOR TO BLDG PERMIT 7/21/04 J_C Acknowledge that this wIIl be done EngIneers signed and sealed drawIngs must be a part of the constructIOn documents 4 Provide drawings that have been prepared by or under the dlrectlon of an Engineer registered under F S Chapter 471 for all fire spnnkler systems as per Flonda BUlldmg Code, 2001 EditIOn, Sec 104 4 1 3 Drawings shall be signed and sealed by a ProfeSSIOnal EnglOeer as per F S 471025 The mstallatlon shall be 10 accordance with NFPA 13, 1999 Edition by a hcensed Fire Spnnkler Contractor under separate penUlt with drawings Please acknowledge PRIOR TO BLDG PERMIT 7/21104 J~C Acknowledge that this wdl be done The Engineers signed and sealed plans must be a part of the construchon documents 5 Provide portable Fire ExtingUishers listed for Class A, Class B and Class C fires that meet the reqUirements ofNFPA 10, must be mstaIled at the pier/land mtersectlon Additional Fife ExtmgUlshers must be placed on the dock so that the maximum travel distance to an ExtmgUlsher does not exceed 75 feet As per NFPA 303, Fife Protecl1on Standard for Mannas and Boat yards, Section 4 2 2 1 6 All reqUirements of NFPA 303, Fire Protection Standard for Mannas and Boat yards must be met PRIOR TO BLDO PERMIT 7/21/04 LC Acknowledge that this Will be done 7 Provide a Standpipe water supply with 2 1/2 Inch connectIOn & 1 1/2 Inch adaptor with breakable cover and cham within 100 feet of any pier/land mtersectlOn As per NFPA 303, Fire ProtectIOn Standard for Marinas and Boat yards, SectIOn 4 34 PRIOR TO CDB 7/21/04 LC Not shown within 100 feet of both docks 8 Cloud all reVISIOns 7/21/04 J_C The revised plan was submitted without any c10udmg Future submittal reVISions must be clouded, PLEASE 9 Plans submitted for Flre ReView mu"t reflect adherence to Flonda Fire PreventIOn Code, 2001 Edl tlon and the follOWing Codes NFP A 101, 2000 Edl tlon, NFP A 70, 1999 Edition and FIonda Statute 633 Show on a Code Reference Sheet 7/21/04 LC Flonda Fire PreventIOn Code must be referenced In the applicable codes list 10 ***PLEASE NOTE*** REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE AUTHORITY HA VINO JURISDICTION SHALL NOT RELEIVE THE APPLICANT OF THE RESPONsmn.ITY OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE 2001 EDITION Harbor Master: No Comments Legal: No Comments Land Resources: 1 7/27/04-Reduce the size of retention pond "An to preserve the Pme trees, enlarge retentIOn pond "B" to recover the lost volume 5/24/04-If a water quality pond IS to be mstalled, recommend placmg It at the east Side of the bUIlding to aVOid the pme trees at the west Side See revised comment above Landscapmg' 1 lITIgation must meet the City Code per SectIOn 3-1203 C, submit plans pnor to CDB to show 100% coverage, ram sensor, automatic tImer, etc Development ReView Agenda - Wednesday, August 18, 2004 - Page 5 I" _I # Parks and Recreation: 1 Open Space and RecreatIOn Impact Fees are due pnor to Issuance of bUilding perm I ts Please contact Deb Richter at 727-562-4817 Stormwater: liThe Slte IS exempt from storm water attenuatIOn and only has to provide water quality retentIOn Pnor to CDB thIs area should be shown on the site plan MET 2 Pnor to bUilding permit a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit IS to be provided Solid Waste: 1 That dumpster servICe be arranged with the Solid Waste Department pnor to the Issuance of an occupatIOnal license or cerl1ficate of occupancy Please contact Tom Glenn - 727-562-4930 7/26/04 Dumpsters and recycling bIOS wdl be rolled out by condo mamtenance employees Traffic Engineering: 1 1 Show dimenSIOns on site plan for tYPical regular and disabled parlang space also dnve aisle Widths (Commumty Development Code Seclion 3-1402) 2 Include current city of Clearwater disabled parkmg space and disabled Sign detall 3 Turmng radIUS inSide garage must be able to accommodate a car turnmg comers Without gomg over the other lane or backmg up 4 Garage supports such as walls must not Impair dnver's Sight VISibility when backing out of parkmg space (Commumty Development Code Section 3-1402) DeSign walls such that the dnver can see when backlOg out (see Belle Harbor) 5 Parkmg garage must have a vertical clearance of 82" per Chapter 11 Flonda B Ulldmg Accessibility Code, Section 11-4 6 5 6 All of the above to be addressed pnor to C D B Planmng: I Color bUlldmg elevations, With dimenSIOns show from BFE to roof mldpomt (use dimensIOnal arrows) need to be provided for each elevation Label the elevatIOn for each sheet Consider elimmatmg the request for a front setback reductIOn The site plan shows bUlldmg height at 48 feet from BFE to roof midpOint The applicatIOn form states the height to be 49 feet Please correct whichever amount IS In error How will parkmg be deSignated, as there IS one short for the hotel portIOn? PrOVide color elevatIOns, all four Sides, for thiS proposal How Will parkmg function for the hotel versus the condommlUms? How IS the site accessed for the hotel and condominIUm uses? 2 3 4 5 6 7 Other: No Comments Notes' ThiS applicatIOn IS suffiCient There are some outstandmg Issues that are expected to be addressed through plan reVISion by August 19,2004 Other Issues are to be addressed by deadlines per staff comments Development ReView Agenda - Wednesday, August 18,2004 - Page 6 September 4, 2004 September 5-7,2004 September 8, 2004 September 9,2004 September 9, 2004 September 9,2004 September 1 0, 2004 September II, 2004 September 14-1 S, 2004 September 19,2004 NOTICE TIME LINE Notice postmarked and matled Humcan Frances hits, no electncity. mail delayed, people leave Notice received by a few locals; forwarded to others. Appointment made with Mr. Gerlock for 9/9 Mr. and Mrs Brennan, Mr RuzZD and Mrs Connor amve at Planning Department for 1 :00 p,rn. appointment. Mr. Gerlock involved in meetings, unaware of appointment , and refers us to Michael Reynolds Mr Reynolds is also unaware of appointment but gives twenty minutes. We arrange an appointment with him for Monday, , Septtember13. We select documents for copying with an arrangement to pick them up the next day. Documents not ready because pnnter is broken Hwrican Frances threatens; many of us decide to follow the state's directive and seek safer ground. Appointment WIth Mr. Reynolds rescheduled for Fnday, September 17. Documents picked up; Mr. Reynolds cancels appointment because of a death in the fanuJy. Susan Watt, a Clearwater Pomt owner and resident of Canada, tells Mrs. Connor that she received her Notice on September 17, 2004, four days before the hearmj. ~ - KIMBLE, GALEN R KIMBLE, CAROL A 1134 SHORE DR EDGEWATER rvID 21037 - 2520 CLEARW ATER POINT NO 3 CONDO ASSN INC C/O STROHN, ROBERT 868 BAYW AY BLVD # 21 CLEARW ATER FL 33767 - 2674 DINOS, GUS G DINOS, MARY 11031 EARLSGATE LN ROCKVILLE MD 20852 - 4559 MC LEESE, KENNETH J 3891 SEVEN DIALS CT MARlETT A GA 30062 - RIST AS, MARK B 5398 DUNNIKER PARK DR DUBLIN OH 43017 - 9606 WU, CHARLES J WU, NANCY C 1616 WY ATTS RIDGE RD CROWNSVlLLE MD 21032 - 2143 SHUTRUMP, FREDRICK C III 6224 HERBERT RD CANFIELD OR 44406 - 9780 SHERIDAN, ARTHUR T SHERIDAN, ANNE L 845 S GULFVIEW BLVD #211 CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 3013 MlTEVSKI, BRANKO P MITEVSKI, LJUBICA B 5925 SHORE BLVD S GULFPORT FL 33707 - 5903 PALUMBO, CARMELA PAL~O,PASQUALE 7 FAIRFAX ST V ALLEY STREAM NY 11580 - 3514 NALLEN, EDWARD NALLEN, PATRICIA 332 E 239TH ST BRONX NY 10470 - SMITH, WILLIAM W 218 CHANDLER DR WEST CHESTER P A 19380 - 6810 HAIDARlS, KENNETH K HAIDARlS, ANNA B 9405 DORAL ST SE WARREN OH 44484 - 2169 CLEARWATER POINT SWIM CLUB INC HOMEOWNERS ASSN 4175 EBAY DR STE 205 CLEARWATERFL 33764 - 6977 UMECK, WILLIAM R UMECK, JUDY K 1499 TROTTERS COVE DUNWOODY GA 30338 - 3851 CORRAO, ELIZABETH 855 BAYWAY BLVD # 901 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2652 CffiAPP ARELLI, PAULINE N 895 S GULFVlEW BLVD # 307 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3024 SCIUTO, JOHN A TRUST C/O BECKER-COOK, CAROL S PR 6100 COLOMBO PLACE DALLAS VA 20189 - 6100 KLEER- VASSER CORP 1 SE 3RD AVE STE 1210 MIAMI FL 33131 - 1714 SEll..ER, KENNETH 731 SNUG ISL CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 1832 MC CARTHY, COLMAN 403 E 62ND S1 # lIB NEW YORK NY 10021 - 7938 MC LELLAN, DAVID R SHERRY, DONNAM 3 HILLANDALE LAND WESTPORT CT 06880- VIT ALE, KATHY 43070 KEYSTONE CANTON Ml48187 - 3400 BRAISTED, WILLIAM D BRAISTED, JOYCEANN M 868 BAYWAY BLVD # 311 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2638 MALCOLM, DONALD D MALCOLM, DARRAH A 104 SPRING A VB GLENEll.. YN IL 60137 - 5826 ZIMLIN, YURIM ZIMLIN, OLGA 40 CENTER ST CRESSKILL NJ 07626 - 2245 BEANE, GLENN L BEANE, JOANN 6 SHERWICK OSWEGO IL 60543 - 9406 STUEBBEN, RONALD C STIJEBBEN, MARGARET J 30477 PICKFORD ST LIVONIA MI 48152 - 3353 CARTER, JOHN G 8 LINDA CT KIRKWOOD P A 17536 - 9518 GIOTIS, IRENE 227 KNICKERBOCKER AVE STAMFORD CT 06907 - 2009 ,........- p;;t aOel - 0'-( o~lo r ~~D BA-{lAJA..{ f!j.J t.) fJle ".... SUTKOWI, RONALD E MC CARTHY, JAMES t'EDLEY, HEATHER L SUTKOWI, LINDA A MC CARTHY, MARY GARTH, JOANNA R 8038 PEPPER WOOD DR 865 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 308 SYCAMORE HOUSE PARK RD GRAND BLANC MI 48439 - 2413 CLEARW ATER FL 33767 - 3020 COLTON LEEDS LS159AJ 00009- UNITED KINGDOM RIORDAN, BLANCHE GANS, OTTO P STRUCK, RAYMOND L 52 RUMSON PL GANS, AUDREY A 2 CAMBRIDGE CIR UTTLE SlL VER NJ 07739 - 1019 868 BAYWAYBLVD # 313 HATTIESBURG MS 39402 - 8876 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2639 GIERLASZYNSKI, STANLEY TRE LINFORD, OWEN P THOMSON, GRETCHEN GIERLASZYNSKI, FRANCES TRE LINFORD, SHEILA M THOMSON, THOMAS TRUST 800 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 908 6465 NAPIER 895 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 207 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3002 PLYMOUTH Ml48170 - 5094 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3023 FESTA, PASQUALE ANDERSON, KAREN L TRE STANCO, JOSEPH A FESTA, PAMELA 5893 OXBORO AVE S1 ANCO, JEAN 15 SONDRA DR STILLWATERMN 55082 - 6151 292 VISTA DR LARKSVILLEPA 18704- ]433 JERICHO NY 11753 - 2807 GRADEN, JOHN J COSTAS, CHRIST TRE KARANTINIDIS, MICHAEL GRADEN, L YNETrE A COSTAS, GEORGIA RESIDENCE KARANTINIDIS, V AlA 2800 LEPRECHAUN LN TR 2143 37TH ST PALM HARBOR FL 34683 - 2316 544 W WELLINGTON AVE ASTORIA NY 11105 - 1914 cmCAGO IL 60657 - 5421 L 'HE UREUX-GILffiERTI , L SHERRIER, ROBERT H LIVINGSTONE, R SCOTT TRE 1802 BIRCHWOOD LN #41 SHERRIER, MILDRED K 895 S GULFVlEW BLVD # 204 ROCKFORD IL 61107 - 1878 895 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 107 CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 3022 CLEAR WATER FL 33767 - 3021 FORTMAN, RONALD A MC NULTY, AGNES D GROSH, MARTfN E FORTMAN, HENRIETTA A 868 BAYWAYBLVD #210 GROSH, BETTY L 868 BAYWAYBLVD# 114 CLEARW ATER FL 33767 - 2635 2587 BRIAR ROSE A VB CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2633 COLUMBUS OH 43231 - 4842 JEFFERY, RICHARD T HARPER, J DONALD SOUPIONlS, COUST ANTINOS 851 BAYWAY BLVD # 406 HARPER, G LOIS DA V AROS, DEAN CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2619 1480 RIVERSIDE DR, STE 905 2343 WIDrSTONE EXWY OTTAWA ON KIG 5HZ 00030- WHITESTONE NY 11357 - 3447 CANADA BOOMKAMP, HUGO FORREST, DEWAYNE SHAW, BRADLEY T JR GOOILANDSEWEG 101 FORREST, BARBARA SHAW, NlZAE 1406 LJ BUSSUM 00015- 61259 CASS RD 855 BAYWAY BLVD # 505 NETHERLANDS CASSOPOLIS MI 49031 - 9406 CLEARWATERFL 33767- IANNACCI, JOSEPH MAC DONALD, EDYTHE I RUBINO, ANNA M IANNACCI, GRACE C/O COURT HOUSE RUBINO, FILIPPO 17 FOX HOLLOW LN 102 E MAIN ST 5054 N OL YMPIA OLD WESTBURY NY 11568- WELLAND ON L3B 3W6 00030- cmCAGO IL 60656 - 3319 1330 CANADA STARRETT, SALLY V 895 S GULF VIEW BLVD # 102 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3032 CORCODILOS, JOHN CORCODILOS, ARETE 800 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 801 CLEARW ATER FL 33767 - 3000 RUBIN, MARVINR TRE RUBIN, SYVIENNE TRE 851 BAYWAYBLVD # 605 CLEARW ATER FL 33767 - 2621 BONDIS, ATHENA 800 S GULF VIEW BLVD # 406 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3001 JORDAN, ELMER H JORDAN, GRACE C PO BOX 395 JACKSON MI 49204 - 0395 GRANNELL JOHN N GRANNELL SUSAN 30 HARDY A VB Y ATELEY HAMPSHIRE GU46 6XU 00003 - GREAT BRITAIN MILLER, ARGENTINA 233 MORELAND CANFIELD OH 44406 - 1027 DI GIOV ANNA, ANTHONY DI GIOV ANNA, MARILYN 80 E GLEN RD DENVILLE NJ 07834 - 1818 BREWER, JAMES H SR TRE 1045 GRANT ST FENTON MI 48430 - 1715 T AMBACK, EDWARD P JR T AMBACK, CAROLE E 868 BAYWAYBLVD # 314 CLEARWATERFL 33763- MARTINELLI, PATRICIA 800 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 706 CLEARW ATER FL 33767 - 3000 VLAHOS, JAMES P 26 NORTHWOOD RD NEWINGTON CT 06111 - 3150 ZUHLKE,EL~ABETHJ WALLACE, LORAN E BR V REALTY ZUHLKE, NORMAN A WALLACE, GLENDA C 120 OCEAN DR 86481 525TH A VB 895 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 303 SEABROOK NH 03874 - 4736 BRUNSWICK NE 68720 - 3002 CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 3033 HODGE, HARRY E TRE MILAZZO, SAM KNAPP, MALCOLMB HODGE, BARBARA T TRE MILAZZO, JUDY KNAPP, SHIRLEY J 845 S GULFVIEW BLVD #308 1410 MITCHELL TRL 855 BAYWAYBLVD # 306 CLEARW ATER FL 33767 - 3014 ELK GROVE VILLA IL 60007 - CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2627 3207 AFENDOULIS, CYNTIDA K SllDERIS,AJUSTllDES MC KINNEY, DAVID W 5361 PRAIRIE HOME DR SllDERIS,FJ\LIOPE MC KINNEY, PAMELA E GRAND RAPllDS MI 49546 - 9015 851 BAYWAYBLVD # 805 851 S BAYWAY BLVD # 90 CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2624 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2651 COMITTO,ANTHONY BRIGHT, MAXINE E HORlATES, EV ANGELOS COMITTO,MARGARETL 868 BAYWAYBLVD # 207 HORIATES, ELEFTHERIA 698 HIDDEN LAKE DR CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2635 2 VIKING RD TARPON SPRINGS FL 34689 - WINCHESTER MA 01890 - 3678 2600 VTLARDO,PATRlCIA TRUHLAR, RONALD J TRE BA YSllDE FAMILY L TD PTNSHP 800 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 202 TRUHLAR, NANCY L TRE 156-05 29TH AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3001 8307 TUDOR CIR FLUSHING NY 11354 - 2405 WILLOW SPRINGS IL 60480 - 1123 LA VIANO, THOMAS F HARTNETT, GERTRUDE L HUSNI, F AROUK Y TRE 4 COLONIAL DR HARTNETT, GERALDINE HUSNI, ISIS N TRE GLEN HEAD NY 11545 - 2800 2350 LINWOOD AVE 400 ISLAND WAY # 1007 FORT LEE NJ 07024 - 3864 CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2136 PRIEST, W JAMES WHELAN, RONALD J GILLEN, FRANCIS X TRE PRIEST, FRED M WHELAN, KATHLEEN GILLEN, MARIE C TRE 868 BAYWAYBLVD #315 800 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 403 800 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 501 CLEARW ATER FL 33767 - 2639 CLEARW ATER FL 33767 - 3001 CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 3000 GRIFFIN, BRIAN DUBEt-CRAM, LOmSE ARGIRIS, THEODORE GRIFFIN, KATHLEEN C/O L'HEUREUX-DUBE, CLAIRE ARGIRIS, CATHY 851 BAYWAYBLVD#40I 380 CHEMIN STLOmS #1807 632 LAKE TRAIL DR CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2619 QUEBEC QC GIS 4Ml 00030- PALOS PARK IL 60464 - 2543 CANADA BURGESS, RUTH A BREMER, THOMAS J GATTON, ROBERT B 895 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 308 865 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 211 GATTON, CECILIA A CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3024 CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 3018 11 GLOVER ST OVER, CAMBRIDGE CB4 5PQ 00003- GREAT BRITAIN JENKINS, DAVID ZARAKAS,PETER MAKRIS, COST AS JENKINS, SYLVIA ZARAKAS, MARIE MAKRIS, STELLA 845 GULFVIEW BLVD # 205 PMB 146 2110 DREW ST CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 3012 1324 SEVEN SPRINGS BLVD CLEARWATERFL 33765 - 3231 NEW PORT RICHEY FL 34655 - 5635 CHASE, PHILIP L BINETTI, GLORIA A TRUST KATSOURAKIS, ETHEL DOW-CHASE, DEIRDRE C/O BINETTI, DONALD V TRE KATSOURAKIS, ANTHONY N 16 GARDNER S1 768 WILSON AVE 287 PARK DR HINGHAM MA 02043 - 3744 FORT MYERS FL 33919- CAMPBELL OH 44405 - 1259 IMRE, ANITA T Clearwater Beach Association Clearwater NeIghborhoods CoalitIon 855 BAYWAYBLVD # 308 David MacNamee Doug WillIams, PresIdent CLEARW ATER FL 33767 - 2654 827 Mandalay Ave 2544 Fnsco Dr Clearwater, FL 33767 Clearwater, FL 33761 J - BUONO, MARY ANN P ARONE, JOSEPH E MC CARTHY, COLEMAN BUONO, EMIDDIO C P ARONE, JULIA E 403 E 62ND ST 2916 VINSETTA 895 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 310 NEW YORK NY 10021 - 7958 ROYAL OAK MI 48073 - 3378 CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 3024 GAILE, GWEN TRUST POLUTNIK, MICHAEL S GAGLIARDI, LORI C/O CRUM, ELEANOR POLUTNlK, JOANNE A 851 BAYWAY BLVD # 402 BOX 384 5351 RESERVE WAY CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2619 ALLEN KY 41601 - 0384 SHEFFIELD VILLAGE OR 44054 - 2965 CLARIZIO, VlNCENZO GHAL Y, RAMSIS F TfUE~LIS,JOFUND 851 BAYWAY BLVD # 708 851 BAYWAY BLVD # 905 THEMELIS, DOMNA CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2623 CLEARW ATER FL 33767 - 2625 3501 MORROW LN MILFORD MI 48381 - 3360 SULLN AN, JOHN M TOLLIS, CONSTANTINO BA TOVSKI, RIZA Y TRE SULLN AN, ANA M TOLLIS, GLORIA M 14 115TH S1 700 ISLAND WAY # 502 855 BAYWAY BLVD # 103 LEMONT lL 60439 - 8750 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1836 CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2626 CLIFF, BARRY J D'AMORE, VlNCENZO KLUCSA]UTS,CHrnUSTOPHER 895 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 304 D'AMORE, ROSA 800 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 101 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3033 21W101 BRIARCLIFF RD CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 3001 LOMBARD IL 60148 - 5268 FAHEY, MARY J OLEJNICZAK, TERESA A VERBIN, MAR TIN A 110 BEACH S1 # 214 800 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 603 VERB IN, GERTRUDE QUEENS NY 11697 - CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 3000 830 S GULF VIEW BLVD # 804 CLEARW ATER FL 33767 - 3025 TIMBER RUN L TD GOBELI, ROBERT C SCAROLA, JAMES R 6715 TIPPECANOE RD BLDG B GOBELI, JANET L SCAROLA, FRLICIA CANFIELD OR 44406 - 8180 855 BA YW A Y BLVD #402 855 BAYWAY BLVD # 502 CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2654 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2628 FILSKOV, JUNE M TRE AL-KHUSHMAN, SAMl WALDEMAR, GEORGE 855 BAYWAY BLVD # 708 AL-TITI, ENAS WALDEMAR, DEBORAH CLEARW ATER FL 33767 - 2652 851 BAYWAYBLVD # 906 316 FOX HILL DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2625 BAITING HOLLOW NY 11933 - 9506 SIOUTIS, BILL WARNER, MARK J TRE LA BIANCA, CARMEN 800 S GULFVIEW BLVD #303 JOHNSON, KENNETH S TRE 868 BAYWAY BLVD # 204 CLEARWATERFL 33767- 640 STEVENSON RD CLEAR WATER FL 33767 - 2634 SOUTH ELGIN IL 60177 - 1133 DRUMMOND, JAMES A NETTESTAD, EDWARD B FLYNN, WILLIAMF DRUMMOND, SANDRA K 800 GULFVlEW BLVD # 806 FLYNN, DOLORES R 625 HIDDEN LN CLEARWATERFL 33767- 601 LAKE HINSDALE DR # 209 GROSSE POINTE WOODS Ml CLARENDON HLS IL 60527 - 48236 - 1520 2243 BRANIGAN, ELVIRA D 4300 SW BOATRAMP AVE PALM CITY FL 34990 - 5303 YOUNG, RUPERTO YOUNG, JANIS M 3 NORTHAMPTON RD AMSTERDAM NY 12010 - 3223 FLEISCHER, GUNTER M FLEISCHER, DENISE J 865 S GULF VIEW BLVD # 304 CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 3019 BA YSIDE CONDO ASSN INC 800BAYWAYBLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2615 CLINKSCALE, ROBERT M 800 BAYWAY BLVD # 10 CLEARW ATER FL 33767 - 2658 LENTZ, COLLEEN A TRE 800 S GULF VIEW BLVD # 407 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3001 BlLLIA, RODY J LIGHT, ROBERT G TRE JANES, DAVID P BlLLIA, GERALDINE A 845 S GULFVIEW BLVD #307 1849 CLEARWATER HARBOR 175 SADDLE DR CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 3014 DR FURLONG PA 18925 - 1017 LARGO FL 33770 - 4527 MIRELLI, LORETTA FOSTER, LEWIS E SCICLUNA, JOHN L 800 S GULFVIEW BL YO # 903 FOSTER, DOLORES H SCICLUN A, THERESA C CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3002 855 BAYWAY BLVD # 601 31925 BALMORAL CT CLEARW ATER FL 33767 - 2652 LIVONIAMI 48154 - 3181 GULF VIEW LANDING INC SALIERNO, ANTONIO PEARSON, RICHARD M 845 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 202 SALIERNO, GWSEPPE 54 PLEASANT RIDGE RD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3012 1416 MULBERRY ST BRANTFORD ON N3R 5L5 00030 SCRANTON P A 18510 - 2292 CANADA ANGELIS, ELIAS WATTS, CEClL H CONDORODIS, A JOHN ANGELIS, ANASTASIA WATTS, LUCILLE R 831 SUIRE AVE 2414 OAK ST 855 BAYWAY BLVD # 703 CINCINNATI OH 45205 -1638 BELLMORE NY 11710 - 3111 CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2650 MORBER, ROBERT M LEAHEY, JOSEPH E IillFFMAN, DORIS R MORBER, MARIAN M 4537 LANSMORE DR 868 SBAYWAYBLVD#M-317 71 HAMPTON HILL DR DAYTON OR 45415 - 3352 CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2674 BUFFALO NY 14221 - 5839 DI NATALE, JOHN COLASANTI, COSIMO MANOLIAS, ANTONIOS DI NATALE, MARIAN COLASANTI, NUNZIA MANOLIAS, MARIA 830 S GULF VIEW BLVD # 205 17 P AMlLLE PL 4644 LAUREL CLUB CIR CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 3009 TORONTO ON M6M 3A9 00030- WEST BLOOMFIELD MI 48323 - CANADA W AGAR, NANCY S HAMIL TON, J T LAFFERTY, MARK A ZUTTERMEISTER, LINDA M HAMlLTON, PHYLLIS M LAFFERTY, LISAD 107 ALETA DR 3 JOHNSON CRESCENT 7309 MARDELL CT BELLEAIR BEACH FL 33786 - SIMCOE ON N3Y 5K9 00030- ORLANDO FL 32835 - 2673 3420 CANADA SEELING, CARA R ALMAR ASSOC BIKOS, OURANIA N 830 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 605 PO BOX 413 855 BAYWAY BLVD # 304 CLEARW ATER FL 33767 - 3025 DENVlLLE NJ 07834 - 0413 CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2627 BOUTROS, NAGUI N CONDON, VERA H YOUNG, FRANK E BOUTROS, SONIA E 851 BAYWAYBLVD # 208 YOUNG, R JOYCE 855 BAYWAY BLVD # 702 CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2617 13200 LOG CABIN PT CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2650 FENTON MI 48430 - 1141 LA GATTUTA, JOSEPH A RUZZO, PATSY A BALSAMO, PAUL LA GA TTUTA, CLARA A RUZZO, DIANNE M BALSAMO, MARGARET 1 NDEE RD #3B 851 BAYWAYBLVD # 604 PMB 157 P ARK RIDGE IL 60068 - 2869 CLEARWATERFL 33767- 140 ISLAND WAY CLEAR WATER FL 33767 - 2216 AMOS, THOMAS E DE HERNANDEZ, CARMEN L CONNOR, DAVID G TRE AMOS, FRANCES C TRE 800 S GULF VIEW BLVD # 808 4079 AQUARINA ST ALEMAN, GILBERTO 0 H TRE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3002 WATERFORD MI 48329 - 2117 13032 WEMBLEY CIR CARMEL IN 46033 - 2465 RUBY, CHRISAH PANDEY, JACQUELINE D BLACK, LESLIE A 1755 HENLEY # 2S 3995 BOULEY ARD DR BLACK, JUDITH W GLENVIEW IL 60025 - 4352 PITTSBURGH PA 15217 - 2619 830 GULFVIEW BLVD # 503 CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 3025 GRANZIG, WILLIAM A SCANLAN, MARIE C DALESSANDRO, PATRICK A GRANZIG, PATRICIA A 855 BAYWAY BLVD # 101 610 N MAPLE LN 830 S GULFVIEW BLVD #906 CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2626 PROSPECT HTS IL 60070 - 1323 CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 3010 TOROSIAN, HELEN VERNOR, RICHARD E TRE VACCARO, GIUSEPPE 855 BAYWAY BLVD # 905 3526 SLADE RUN DR VACCARO, DON CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2628 FALLS CHURCH V A 22042 - 3924 57 REGENT RD DOWNSVIEW ON M3K IG8 00030 ~ CANADA MARTINI, JOHN C DE SANTIS, RICHARD J BROWN, JAJ\1ES MARTINI, ANNE M KASCSAK, JOANNE BROWN, ROBIN PO BOX 53 51 CEDAR DR 1630 CREEKVIEW DR WOBURN MA 01801 - 0053 EAST HAMPTON NY 11937 - FLORENCE KY 41042 - 8053 1409 DURKIN, SAIL Y C KOURTIS, GUS P GAST, L L 830 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 101 KOURTIS, MOUSCHOULA GAST, WANDA CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3009 851 BAYWAYBLVD # 303 1151 ARLINBROOK DR CLEARWATER FL 33767- NEW PORT RICHEY FL 34655 - SMITH, JUNE B CONDON, RAYMOND Y ASOV A, MORRIS M 13937 YORK RD CONDON, EILEEN H Y ASOV A, VICTORIA SPARKS MD 21152 - 9666 4300 MARTHA AVE # 3-D 5018 CAMBERLYLN BRONX NY 10470 - 2023 OLDSMAR FL 34677 - 5113 BUTTON, VIRGINIA L TRE CORNETT A, JOSEPH TRE SHERRARD, HENRY J TRE 2905 OLD BROADMOOR RD CORNETT A, RITA TRE HODGE, DONNA M TRE COLORADO SPGS CO 80906 - 19 TERRACE C1 845 S GULFVIEW BLVD #204 3645 OLD WESTBURY NY 11568 - CLEARW ATER FL 33767 - 3012 1301 PETERSEN, HARRY L F AMA, AUGUST GLEASON, DAVID J PETERSEN, MILDRED H F AMA, TERESA 238 5T ANDREWS DR 868 BAYWAY BLVD # 307 41 MELDON A VB FRANKLIN TN 37069 -7046 CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2638 ALBERTSONNY 11507 - 2028 PADLO, JOSEPH V ALICENTI, ANTOINETTE VOUK, ALFRED PADLO,CHARLOTTE 851 BAYWAY BLVD # 102 VOUK,MARY 830 S GULF VIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2616 625 THE WEST MALL 601 ETOBICOKE ON M9C 4 W9 00030- CLEARW ATER FL 60656 - 271 I CANADA DAVIS, CHARLOTTE P EVES, WilLIAM T A VICHOUSER, RICHARD E TRE 851 BAYWAYBLVD #702 EVES, FRANCES M 1587-C MAIN ST CLEAR WATER FL 33767 - 2622 273 TERRY RD DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 4652 SMITHTOWN NY 11787 - 5505 CLEARWATER POINT SWIM SCHMALE,LARRY FATHAUER, GEORGEH CLUB INC HOMEOWNERS 1775 E COUNTYRD FATHAUER, JOHANNE W ASSN CROSS PLAINS IN 47017- 830 S GULF VIEW BLVD # 303 4175 E BAY DR STE 205 CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 3009 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 6977 VENABLES, LORETTA S TRE LAMB, BENJAMIN STEPHENS, WILBURN T 2300 W MANOR DR LAMB, JOAN L STEPHENS, RUBY G BURNSVILLE MN 55337 - 2039 18 CONCORDE PL, STE 528 POBOX 2303 DON MILLS ON M3C 3T9 00030 ~ CANADA LAKE OZARK MO 65049 - 2303 NOEL, LEON J HODGE, HARRY DE FILLIPPIS, JARMILLA M NOEL, SARAH SHERRARD, HENRY IRE 524 CAMPBELL AVE 10020 NEW PARK RD 845 S GULF VIEW BLVD # 204 WHEATON JL 60187 - 5537 IAMPAFL 33626 - 5414 CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 3012 SCHLACHfMEYER, SOPHIE RAPTOULIS, GEORGE TRE PATTERSON, LORENA 868 BAYWAY BLVD # 208 RAPTOVLIS, IRENE A TRE 868 BA YW A Y BLVD # M318 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2635 868 BAYWAYBLVD # 209 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2674 CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2635 ALTEMAR, MARCELO POULSEN, RICHARD SALATA, BARBARA J AL TEMAR, CIBELE TRACHUCK,ANTON 110 TIMBER RUN DR 800 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 204 7 WAINWRIGHT RD #60 CANFIELD OH 44406 - 8630 CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 3001 WINCHESTER MA 01890 - 2378 Me KENZIE, JOSEPH C TRE BRlSCALL, ANN IRE CLEARWATER POINT NO 8 855 BAYWAY BLVD # 906 845 S GULFVIEW BLVD #302 CONDO ASSN INC CLEARW ATER FL 33767 - 2628 CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 3013 830 S GULFVIEW BLVD STE 1001 CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 3028 TRIANT AFYLLOS, MARIA MORANT, JOHNATHEN BOURAS, BASILE 234 HOPE ST POBOX 5603 BODRAS, ANGELEKI STANFORD CT 06906 - 1602 P AR5IPP ANY NJ 07054 ~ 6603 2820 23RD AVE ASTORIA NY 11105 - 2708 KRISHNA, KUCHIBHOTLA M SCHLIESINGER, GUNTER R SABEL, RUDY V TRE KRISHNA, NAGA B SCHLIESINGER, LIDIA "SABEL, MAGDALENA TRE 855 BAYWAY BLVD # 206 855 BAYWAY BLVD # 501 1340 GULF BLVD # 12-E CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2654 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2627 CLEARW ATER FL 33767 - 2809 IMREDY, NIKOLAUS DECADE PROPERTIES INC DA V AILE, ALMA C IMREDY, EDITH N19 W24130 RlVERWOOD DR 2426 N WEST BROOK RD 125 ACACIA CIR # 515 #100 ELMWOOD PARK IL 60707 - IND HEAD PARK IL 60525 - 4409 WAUKESHA WI 53188 -1131 2425 MC CANNON, NORMAN J JR AMOS, THOMAS E SULLIV AN, JOSEPH P MC CANNON, MARY T AMOS, FRANCES C SULLIV AN, JOAN M 90 NORTH ST 4079 AQUARINA PO BOX 265 AGAWAMMAOIOOI-1322 W ATERFORD MI 48329 - 2117 SOUTH DENNIS MA 02660 - 0265 MANNION, JOSEPH E FAVIA, MICHAEL TRE GRALl, HENDRICA N TRE MANNION, ELIZABETH J 420 W NORTH AVE 15 W 752 83RD ST 887 S GULF VIEW BLVD ADDISON IL 60101 - 4912 BURR RIDGE IL 60527 - 5943 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3004 PIERCE, CHARLES S HADLER, ANITA B TRE SCHNEIDER, FERDINAND PIERCE, ANGELINE 895 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 302 SCHNEIDER, JENNIFER 830 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 702 CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 3033 AUF DER SCHOTTENWIESE 38 CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 3025 A-1160 VIENNA 00024- AUSTRIA SHERRARD, HENRY J TRE Y ACALIS, GEORGE S UNRUH, ANTHONY J HODGE, DONNA M TRE Y ACALIS, ELAINE V UNRUH, JANET 845 S GULFVIEW BLVD #204 1540 GULF BLVD PH 5 3938 LAKEVIEW CT CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3012 CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 3905 LONG GROVE IL 60047 -7921 PERCffiALLI, GINO KURKJIAN, GREGORY A JR SMIRLIS, THEODORE PERCffiALLI, LAURA KURKJIAN, LUEDDY N S~IS,PATRICIA 12 LONG RIDGE LANE 27W 4] 5 WALLACE RD 9 HORN LN GLEN HEAD NY 11545 - 2506 WHEATON IL 60]87 -7889 LEVITTOWN NY 11756 - BORDIGNON, PRIMO D TRE KURE, LESLEY G BRADY, THOMAS J BORDIGNON, MARLENE R TRE KURE, HELEN J BRADY, BARBARA 741 ADMIRAL CT 1037 VICTORIA A VB 7213 CLOISTER RD ROUND LAKE PARK IL 60073 - BERKELEY IL 60] 63 - 1047 TOLEDO OH 43617 - 2213 2786 MICHALEK, RUDOLPH L FUEHRER, CAROL K FEDELE, JOE MICHALEK, CHRISTINE C 29119 EDGEWOOD RD 865 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 101 6875 ANGEBLUFF CIR BAY VILLAGE OH 44140 - 1306 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3015 DALLAS TX 75248 - 4140 FOX, RONALD D KLINGMANN, HORST TRE KYRIAZIS, NICHOLAS FOX, DORIS A 830 S GULFVIEW BLVD #902 KYRIAZIS, CHRISOULA 10620 BROOKRIDGE DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3010 855 BAYWAY BLVD # 503 FRANKFORT IL 60423 - 7910 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2628 LA GIOIA, VITO LOKSA, EDWARD W GAST, L L LA GIOIA, GINA LOKSA, BARBARA T GAST, W ANnA H 21W310 TEMPLE DR 851 BAYWAY BLVD # 902 865 S GULF VIEW BLVD # G-207 ITASCA II.. 60143 - 1924 CLEARW A TER FL 33767 - 2625 CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 3030 ZAFIRAKIS, GREGORY WELCH, KARL ESPOSITO, GUY C ZAFIRAKIS, KEL Y D WELCH, RENEE ESPOSITO, CARMELA 39 NATURE COVE CT 22420 LAW A VB 6N721 FOLEYLN WlLLIAMSVILLE NY 14221 - DEARBORN Ml48124 - 1007 ST CHARLES IL 60175 - 6316 THRASH, JACK W V AN SWOL, PATRICIA FEAST, LUCILLE E THRASH, JUNE G 800 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 702 765 N 34TH ST 868 BAYWAYBLVD# 102 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3000 PADUCAHKY 42001 - 4243 CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2631 ALBRECHT, CLIFFORD C BILBY, FAYE Y SHUTRUNW,ELaABETHJ ALBRECHT, JANET E 3163 WEST 200 N 785 DEL NORO DR 830 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 705 BARGERSVILLE IN 46106 - 9455 SAFETY HARBOR FL 34695- CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3025 4230 THOMAS, LOWELL R MC CULLOUGH, SUSAN M BRENNAN, BERNARD P TRE 208 DANA RUN 32 TRAILSIDE DR BRENNAN, MAUREEN I TRE MAPLE SHADE NJ 08052 - WALPOLE MA 02081 - 2324 851 BA YW A Y BLVD # 10 1 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2616 CRAINE, WILLIAM D CLEARWATER POINT 2 INC SALBERG, ARNOLD CRAINE, DOROTHY C ASSN INC SALBERG, GRACE 851 BAYWAYBLVD # 601 C/O FLEISCHER, GUNTHER 865 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 110 CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2621 865 S GULFVIEW BLVD APT 30 CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 3016 CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 3030 876165 ONTARIO INC WALSER, CARLA J NELSON, FRANCES C/O FORTUNA, VICTOR 855 BAYWAYBLVD # 403 NELSON, MARK S 10 PRINCESS ANDREA CT CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2654 855 BAYWAY BLVD # 606 BRAMPTON ONL6T 3Y7 00030- CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2628 CANADA BELL, JAMES B P APP AS, JOHN C BASE, KATHERINE BELL, MARGARET L P APP AS, CONSTANCE BASE, JIM 1274 RUFFNER RD 800 S GULF VIEW BLVD # 707 830 S GULFVIEW BL VO # 604 NISKA YUNA NY 12309 - 4601 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3000 CLEARW ATER FL 33767 - 3025 ELSEN,BERNHARD GRUSS, HENRY P SPENGLER, BARRY ELSEN, LIESELOTIE GRUSS, VALERIE A CLELA}ij),PATFUCIAJ AM ZOLLSTOCK 25 432 N PROSPECT A VB 5897 EAST LAKE DR 0-61352 BAD HOMBURG 1 00004. PARK RIDGE IL 60068 - 3463 HASLETT Ml 48840 - 8936 GERMANY GAWLIK, ANDRZEJ FRANKIEWICZ, LARRY L Me ARDLE, RAMONA S TRE GAWLIK, DONATA 17680 NORTHVILLE TRL 800 S GULFVIEW BL VB # 205 UL ZIELONOGORSKA 4 NORTHVILLEMI 48167 - 3271 CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 3001 SZCZECLIN 71084 00000- POLAND HYNES, KENNETH] SGROI, GERALD E lVIARSTERS, B A RAND HYNES, JEAN SGROI, ANNM MARSTERS, DIANE 800 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 807 23 WOODVILLE LN PO BOX 8755 CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 3002 ALBERTSON NY 11507 - 11 11 HUMACAO PR 00792 - 8755 CLEARWATER POINT NO 4 SALIERNO,GfUSEPPE CLEARWATER YACHT CLUB CONDO ASSN INC SALIERNO, ANTONIO INC C/O UVINGSTONE, ROBERT 104 FAWN DR 830 BAYWAY BLVD 895 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 20 MOSCOW PA 18444 - 9684 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2613 CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 3031 BUCCI, THOMAS S BETZ, FREDERICK W RAMQUIST, ROSALIE J 855 BAYWAY BLVD # 902 BETZ, DONNA M 865 S GULF VIEW BLVD # 312 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2652 5384 PIONEER DR CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 3020 CINCINNATI OH 45247 - 6501 HODGE&SUNGETAWAY BANOOB, SAMIR N PATTERSON, DONALDB 800BAYWAY BLVD # 20 BANOOB, NARGIS R PATTERSON, NANCY J CLEARW ATER FL 33767 - 2659 4303 CANNES AVE 865 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 210 LUTZ FL 33558 - CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 3018 THACHER, MARGlT WATSON, INEZ J BAUM, DAVID L THACHER, WYNN 868 BA YW A Y BLVD # 211 BAUM, PA!v1ELA S 9925 UPPER I61ST S1 W CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2635 800 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 207 LAKEVILLE MN 55044- CLEARWA1ERFL 33767 - 3001 SULLIVAN, ROBERT M BURKHARDT, JOHN K IAQUINTO, MARY S SULLIV AN, JEANNINE F 855 BAYW AY BLVD # 504 KOWECK, PAUL 830 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 507 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2628 3777 BOULDER DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3025 TROY Ml 48084 - 1151 Me KENZIE, JACQUELYN L WALDEMAR, MARGARET M SULLN AN, JOSEPH P TRE 1401 GULF BLVD # 116 SULLIVAN, JOAN M 855 BAYWAYBLVD # 906 CLEAR WATER FL 33767 - 2832 PO BOX 265 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2628 SOUTH DENNIS MA 02660 - 0265 DORAN, JAMES E STORMS, H DUANE TAYLOR, MARY S IRE DORAN, ROSANN STORMS, ROZANNE R C/O RIPKA, NANCY S TRE 613 SAYRE DR 5 S BROOKWOOD DR 7 PETERSON LN PRINCETON NJ 08540 - 5834 MONTCLAIR NJ 07042 - 2440 PALM HARBOR FL 34683 - 1821 STRANGE, BYRON G ffiRAHIM, RAMSlS G DAKHLIAN, MARGUERITE A STRANGE,JESS~ 830 S GULF VIEW BLVD # 907 IRE 3519NE 158THPL CLEARW ATER FL 33767 - 3010 855 BAYWAY BLVD # 604 SEATTLE WA 98155 - 6649 CLEARWATERFL 33767- IBRAHIM., GUIRGUIS A GIORDANO, FRANCIS L FOSBERG, ROSS M TRE ffiRAHIM, ASSINAT A 26 COURT ST 851 BAYWAYBLVD # 403 855 BAYWAY BLVD # 801 BROOKLYN NY 11242 - 0103 CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2619 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2628 FREDERICO, STANLEY L TRE PFAFFLIN, MARION S LAMPBELL, JAMES G FREDERICO, THERESA A TRE C/O CARROLL, GEORGE M CAMPBELL, BARBARA I 865 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 112 1040 VILLAGE SQUARE 868 BAYWAY BLVD # 111 CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 3016 ALTOON WI 54720 - 2557 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2630 THOMAS, DAVID J PARADISO, PAUL CHBANE, DIMAS POBOX 2895 PARADISO, LOUIS DE ANDRADE, ROBERTA AKRON OH 44309 - 2895 1804 W WOODLAND AVE 830 S GULFVTEW BLVD # 401 ADDISON IL 60101 - 1731 CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 3009 SOKOLOWSKI, JACQUELINE G CEREN, JEFFREY A PARKS, SHIRLEY T TRE CEREN, JACQUELINE B P ARKS, GORDON C 87 TRENT CT 2607 TURNBERRY RD 855 BAYWAYBLVD #706 BURR RIDGE IL 60527 - 6476 SAINT CHARLES IL 60174 - 8706 CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2652 MUNSELL, ROBERTF FURLETTI, ROBERT FORTMAN, RONALD A MUNSELL, BARBARA J FURLETTI, HELEN A FORTMAN, HENRIETTA A 895 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 103 182 LENOX A VB 868 BAYWAYBLVD# 114 CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 3032 NEW MILFORD NJ 07646 - 2618 CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2633 RODITIS, SOTIRIS J RYAN, ROBERTI CLEARWATER POINT NO I 2905 COTE VER TV # 606 RYAN, SHEILA S CONDO ASSN INC VILLE ST LAURENT PQ H4R 2L4 8227 N ELMORE C/O BERNARD, RICHARD 00030 - NILES IL 60714 - 2413 845 S GULFVIEW BLVD APT 11 CANADA CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3029 SHUMATE, ARlHUR B KYRES, PANAIOTA KYRES, ANDRE 800 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 201 7070 LEON TREPANIER 212 S COOLIDGE AVE CLEAR WATER FL 33767 - 300 I CATIERVILLE QC H4K 2P4 TAMPAFL 33609 - 3828 00030 M CANADA LAGATTUTA, JOHN M SCENIC CYCLING INC CLEARWATER POINT INC I II LAGATTUTA, JOSEPH PO BOX 3174 ill IV V HOMEOWNERS ASSNS 1416 GARDEN LISLE IL 60532 - 8174 825 S GULF VIEW BLVD P ARK RIDGE IL 60068 - CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3027 MC AFOOS, I ALLEN STROH1v1, PATRICIA A ZEH, ROSALLE M MC AFOOS, J ALLEN JR STROH1v1, ROBERT A 1310 GULF BLVD # 3-F 868 BAYWAY BLVD # 212 868 BAYWAYBLVD # 213 CLEARWATER FL 33767- CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2635 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2636 PINKEL, ALICE M GARRETT, JAJvIES W BOTROS, GEORGE 845 S GULFVIEWBLVD #212 GARRETT, OANN W BOTROS, ANEST A CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3013 5215 OAKLEY S1 830 S GULF VIEW BL YO # 602 DULUTH MN 55804 - 1320 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3025 SCANLON, lAMES M WECHSLER, ROBERTO SUTPHEN, HARRY E SCANLON, ALICE M WECHSLER, ILANA SUTPHEN, DORIS M 851 BA YW A Y BLVD # 904 895 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 110 1096 COOLRIDGE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2625 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3021 GRAND BLANC MI 48439 - 4982 KOLNER, BRYANT M KOLNER, BEATRICE J 868 BAYWAY BLVD # 310 CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2638 JUNCAL, JOAQUIM F JUNCAL, JOSEPH M 1905 PILGRIMS WAY # 402 OAKVILLE ON L6M 2X2 00030- CANADA HAMIL TON, ROBERT G TRE HAMILTON, LOUIS L TRE 4148 HARBOR C1R S LARGO FL 33770 - 4561 DUWAR, JANIS SOO S GULFVIEW BLVD # 902 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3002 RONDO, KRYSTYNA SIKORA, ZffiIGNIEW 591 PARK AVE NEW YORK NY 10021 - 7309 MELLING TOOL CO PO BOX 1188 JACKSON MT 49204 - 1188 SHERRARD, HENRY J TRE HODGE, HARRY E TRE 845 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 204 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3012 FINNEY, BERNARD 4423 COLONY PLAZA NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 - 6346 TANNER,LINDAS c/o R G HENOe Q 'PREGO' EDDY GREEN RD L YTCHETI MA TRAVERS NR POOLE DORSET BH166HL 00003- GREAT BRITAIN OM STEAD, GORDON E OMSTEAD, EDITH C BOX 105 WHEATLEY ON NOP 2PO 00030- CANADA BRUSILOUSKY, DMITRY BRUSILOUSKY, TSIL Y A 800 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 208 CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 3001 DUBE'-CRAM, LOUISE C/O L'HEUREUX DUBE #208 1220 RUE BRIAND QUEBEC PQ GIR 5X2 00030- CANADA EURlCH, DAVID J TRE EURICH, JOAN M TRE 865 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 109 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - CURRENT OWNER 800 S GULF VIEW BLVD # 907 CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 3002 MAGGANAS, KOSTAS A MAGGANAS, PAULINE 5629 KIPPEN DR EAST AMHERST NY 14051 -1966 FREDERlCO, S1 ANLEY L FREDERICO, THERESA A 865 S GULF VIEW BLVD # 108 CLEARW ATER FL 33767 - 3016 GENNARI, ELISA 148 PRINCE STREET BOSTON MA 02113 - 1007 NEDIC, SVETLANA 851 BAYWAY BLVD # 306 CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2618 SP ANDE, GERALD L 16430 IRIS CT LAKEVILLE MN 55044 - 5833 MEYER, LUCIANA M 800 S GULF VIEW BLVD # 608 CLEAR WATER FL 33767 - 3000 lillNTROS, PETER 16 UPPER DR HUNTINGTON NY 11743 - 4725 COMNINEL, GEORGE IRE COMNINEL, MARILYN A TRE 908 HUNTER LN TARPON SPRINGS FL 34689 - 5755 HICKS, KENNETH P lUCKS, SARA T 343 5TH AVE HUNTINGTON WV 2570 I - IS11 PONTIUS, K JEFF 830 S GULFVIEW BL YO # 102 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3009 O'BRIEN, JOHN K O'BRIEN, THADDEUS M 895 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 104 CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 3032 LAKEWOOD PROPERTIES MGT 420 KEDZIE ST EAST LANSING W 48823 - 3532 MIKOS, GEORGE MIKOS, HELEN 103 CHESTNUT ST W WHITBY ON LIN 2Y6 00030- CANADA MIKHAIL, ADEL A MIKHAIL, NARGUIS L 2332 W 111TH ST BLOOMINGTON MN 55431 - 3933 OWNBEY, NELLIE B TRE 845 S GULFVIEW BLVD # I 05 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3011 LAVELLE, 1vlICHAEL J LA YELLE, CHRISTINE 55 ROBBINS DR E WILLISTON NY 11596 - 2009 ISKRA, EMIL GASIK, FORREST M rillAMS, LOUIS N ISKRA, CHRISTOPHER E 18 JAMES ST ADAMS, JEAN R 1733 CASEY JONES CT BEVERL Y MA 01915 - 3704 868 BAYWAY BLVD # 115 CLEARW ATER FL 33765 - 1701 CLEARW ATER FL 33767 - 2633 GRAPSKI, JEAN C ZARLENGA. NICHOLAS R CLEARWATER POINT NO 7 868 BAYWAY BLVD # 214 830 S GULF VIEW BLVD # 708 CONDO ASSN INe CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2636 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3025 851 BAYWAYBLVD CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2651 LAMBERT,PAULG MARDER, MURREY BOV A, RICHARD A SR LAMBERT, BERTHA J MARDER, FRANCES C BOV A. EILEEN K 855 BAYWAYBLVD # 201 711 6TH ST SW 855 BAYWAYBLVD # 808 CLEARW ATER FL 33767 - 2627 WASHINGTON DC 20024 - 2721 CLEARWATERFL 33767- RAMOS, JOSE P KARKOSKl, JOHN R CLINKSCALE, ROBERT M DE LURDES, MARIA D MUNN, SHELDON W 800 BAYWAYBLVD # 10 625 TIlE WEST MALL # 601 895 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 106 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2658 ETOBICOKE ON M9C 4W9 00030- CLEARW ATER FL 33767 - 3021 CANADA HILL,BURYLP TRE VITUCCI, MARYL TRE KENWORTHY, HELEN C 290 PANORAMA CIR 5141 CARRIAGE HILL 124 BREWSTER PL SEDONA AZ 86336 - 5545 CINCINNATI OH 45248 - 6815 CAMBRIDGE ON N3C 3V3 00030 CANADA VOS, WILMA H TRE CLEARW ATER POINT INC I PATENAUDE, SHEILA R TRE 895 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 309 HOMEOWNERS ASSN 868 BAYWAYBLVD # 101 CLEARW ATER FL 33767 - 3024 845 S GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2631 CLEARW ATER FL 33767 - 3029 REYNOLDS, CHARLES A THORNTON, KEITH DOWDEN, JERRY R REYNOLDS, SANDRA E 3120 SHADE RD BRADSHAW, JOHN W 11 SHINGLE HILL RD AKRON OH 44333 - 1838 PO BOX 11 59 WEST HAVEN CT 06516 - 5537 SAINT CHARLES IL 60174 -7159 CARAGHER, THOMAS M CARBONARA, DONATO F MC CUNE, PAUL M CARAGHER, ARLENE R CARBONARA, ANNA PO BOX 270142 830 S GULF VIEW BLVD # 704 7608 W AINSLIE ST HARTFORD WI 53027 - 0142 CLEARW ATER FL 33767 - 3025 HARWOOD HEIGHTS IL 60706 - 3347 SIP AKIS, TAR YN YESSAIAN, JOYCE A WHITE, I M 6280 SHACKELFORD TER 845 S GULF VIEW BLVD # 112 WHITE, VIRGINIA B ALEXANDRIA V A 22312 - 1728 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3012 7943 KEMPER CT PLEASANTON CA 94588 - 3112 DESPOTAKIS, STAMATIOS CLEAR WATER POINT INC II MOUSKY, STAFFORD K DESPOTAKIS, STAMATIA HOMEOWNERS ASSN 279 E 44TH ST APT 10J 226-] 0 59TH AVE 845 S GULFVIEW BLVD NEW YORK NY 10017 - 4346 BA YSIDE NY 11364 - 2323 CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 3029 BAGDON, JOHN KITTO, RICHARD A ADOLFIE, LAWRENCE D BAGDON, COLLEEN M KITTO, SANDRA L 9415 CROSSPOINTE DR 6742 SOUTH POTNTE DR 533 97TH PL SE F AIRF AX ST A V A 22039 - 2659 TINLEY PARK IL 60477 - 3995 BELLEVUE W A 98004 - 4220 ROSS, CYNTHlA A BOZZO, PHYLLIS MC MlLLAN, HENRY , 800 S GULF VIEW BLVD # 906 830 S GULF VIEW BLVD # 508 MC MILLAN, MARY M CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3002 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3025 851 BAYWAYBLVD# 502 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2620 WATT, SUSAN A MC GINTY-HINSON, MA YE PRlNOS, NICHOLAS 1566 SPRING RD MC GINTY TRUST PRlNOS, MARY J MISSISSAUGA ON L5J IN3 851 BAYWAY BLVD # 705 851 BAYWAYBLVD # 801 00030. CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2623 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2623 CANADA PONTRELLI, JOANN M TRE SHIRES, PATRICIA W CLEARWATER POINT SWIM OS424 CADWELL SlllRES, PAUL R CLUB INC HOMEOWNERS ELl\1HURST IL 60126 - 611 WDAPHNERD ASSN MILWAUKEE WI 53217 - 4037 4175 E BAY DR STE 205 CLEARWATERFL 33764 - 6977 KRUP A, EDWARD H TRUST FREDERICO, STANLEY L NICHOLSON, FAY A KRUPA, LEEARD V TRUST FREDERICO, THERESA NICHOLSON, CHARLES W 13247 LAKE SHORE DR 865 GULF VIEW BLVD # 104 948 RIVERSIDE RIDGE FENTON MI 48430 -1019 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3015 TARPON SPRINGS FL 34688- 8800 CRISTESCU, GEORGE TRACHUCK,ANTON SIDEROPOULOS, A THAN ASIOS CRISTESCU, MARIANA TRACHUCK, GRETE SIDEROPOULOS, MARIA 800 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 306 4955 RIVER RD, APT 312 1550 PANAMA # 604 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3001 DELTA BC V4K 4V9 00030- BROSSARD QC J4W 2W3 00030- CANADA CANADA MC CARTHY, RICHARD C PERRINE, MARTHA J SMITH, LELAND C TRE MC CARTHY, ANNA 855 BAYWAY BLVD # 303 SMITH, MARY B TRE 5993 FRESH POND RD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2626 855 BAYWAYBLVD # 602 MASPETH NY 11378 - 3437 CLEARW ATER FL 33767 - 2652 VELLA, EDWARD L JR SCHULMAN, SUSAN H MILLER, SUSAN R VELLA, BRENDA S SCHULMAN, HELEN P 2271 COUNTRY CLUD DR 415 ELM ST 210 CARYL WAY UPPER ST CLAIR PA 15241 - PITTSFIELD MA 01201 - 6507 OLDSMAR FL 34677 - 2265 2336 MANNING, MICHAEL H THACHER, WYNN L STEVENSON, ROBERT J MANNING, ANNETTE THACHER, MARGIT A BRANDAU, MARY S 10080 WELLMAN 9925 UPPER 161ST ST W 221 HlLLCREST BLVD STREETSBORO OR 44241 - ]6] 1 LAKEVll..LE MN 55044 - 7662 YPSILANTI Ml48197 - 4336 Me GUNIGAL, FRANCINE LAG A TTUT A, NICHOLAS J LEVIT, LOUIS W TRUST LAGATTUTA, MARY B LEVIT, ELLEN G MC GUNIGAL, HARRY A TRE 324 S LINCOLN AVE 3741 S MISSION HlLLS RD # 501 825 S GULFVlEW BLVD # 105 PARK RIDGE IL 60068 - 3814 NORTHBROOK IL 60062 - 5748 CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 3034 MORRISSY, MICHAEL J SULLIV AN, TIMOTHY D CALLIS, THEODORE SMID, GERAD P SULLIV AN, JUDITH E CALLIS, CONSTANCE 40W580 ATCHINSON DR 868 BAYWAY BLVD # 108 868 BAY WAY BLVD # 215 HAMPSHIRE IL 60140 - 9003 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2630 CLEARW ATER FL 33767 - 2636 RAPTOULIS, MARIA TRE BOWEN, MARIE A ROGERS, JAMES J SR 868 BAYWAYBLVD # 309 800 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 103 ROGERS, JACQUELYN T CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2638 CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 3001 800 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 305 CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 3001 ILACQUA, ANTHONY CARUSO, MARYF TRE KOUTSOUMBARIS, FROSO ILACQUA, ANTHONY J JR RICHARD, LYNN TRE 800 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 805 20 I-IaL TOP ST 17 CREELAND AVE CLEAR WATER FL 33767 - 3002 MIL TON MA 02186 - 5805 MJLFORD CT 06460 -7314 JOHNSON, CHARLES MAIETTA FAMILY HOLDINGS KLOCKOW, R GORDON JOHNSON, GAIL 16 HILL VIEW AVE SEYFRIED-KLOCKOW, NANCY 830 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 103 MORRIS PLAINS NJ 07950 - 2115 J CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 3009 491 W WASHINGTON S1 RENSSELAER IN 47978 - 2712 GOMEZ, NIURKA MUROV, VIRGINIA C TRE ANDRETTI, DEE A GOMEZ, YURI 865 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 111 457 ROSE INN AVE 851 BAYWAY BLVD # 505 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3016 NAZARETH PA 18064 - 9234 CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2620 VOUGIOUKLAKIS, DEMETRIOS MOTTER, JEAN E POZNANSKI, WALTER W p 800 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 508 POZNANSKI, BEATRICE I VOUGIOUKLAKIS, C CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 3000 203 E 72ND ST APT 2A 20257 COACHWOOD RD NEW YORK NY 10021 - 4563 RIVERVIEW MI 48192 - 7905 HAGSTROM, ELIN A MEO, SAM A CLEARWATER POINT INC NO 7 851 BAYWAY BLVD # 104 MEO, JEAN A HOMEOWNERS ASSN CLEARWA1ERFL 33767 - 2616 851 BAYWAYBLVD# 606 855 BAYWAYBLVD CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2622 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2653 FABIAN, FRANK B FERRIS, DONALD M 1066283 ONTARIO LID 507 S STATE S1 FERRIS, ARLENE E CIO DELLAPORTAS, JOHN NEWTOWN P A 18940 - 1933 800 GULFVIEW BLVD # 503 J & A BLDG SERVICES LID 37 SKAGWAY AVE CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 3000 TORONTO ON MIM 3T9 00030- CANADA SCHULZ, LOUIS A CLEARWATER POINT INC III RICHTER, ANNA SCHULZ, CHRISTIANE E HOMEOWNERS ASSN 139-11 13THAVE 1 BROOKWOOD DR 868 BAYWAYBLVD WHITESTONE NY 11357 - 2312 NEWTOWN CT 06470 -1842 CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2674 T AGLIENTE, THOMAS CLEARWATER POINT INC IV NOV AI<, NANCY J TRE PINTO, FRANK G HOMEOWNERS ASSN NOVAK, FRED C TRE 865 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 303 868 BAYWAYBLVD 5978 PETE'S POfNT RD CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 3019 CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2674 CONOVER WI 54519 - 9242 " ORIGINAL CDB Meetmg Date Case Number Agenda Item Owner Applicant! Representative Address September 21. 2004 FLD2004-04026 F4 Decade PropertIes Inc , ftq~ ~ "~/.;o"IIfAJ~ J eft' Keierleber 850 Bayway Boulevard CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Development approval of a mIxed use development for 13 multI-faID1ly resIdential umts and SIX hotel units with a reductIon of the front (south) setback, along Bayway Boulevard, from 15 feet to 603 feet (to pavement), and a buIlding heIght mcrease from 35 feet to 49 feet from base flood elevatIOn (plus roof appurtenances), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the prOVIsions of Section 2-803 C EXISTING ZONING/LAND USE: Tounst (T) DiStrict, Resort Faclhtles High (RFH) PROPERTY SIZE: o 66 acres, 28,904 square feet J J 1. / k It 'J rf{( Current Use Hotel J.-t, u /It,Hrr. .., u I Proposed Use MIxed use multi-family resIdential and hotel /3 /IA "" M t Wet'l VA ,-ivo ADJACENT ZONING/LAND USES: North Preservation Dlstnct (P), Clearwater Harbor East HIgh DensIty ResIdential (HDR), MuItI-fanllly residential South HIgh DenSity Residential (HDR), Multi-family resIdentIal West Tounst Dlstnct (T), Multl-fanuly resIdential PROPERTY USE: CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY: Multl-farruIy residential uses dominate the surroundIng area ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 0 66-acre overall SIte IS located on the north Side of Bayway Boulevard, approXImately 600 feet east of the mtersectlOn of Gulf Boulevard On the site Itself IS an eXIstmg hotel, Chart house SUites, on Clearwater Bay Slaff Report - Commumty Development Board - September 21, 2004 - Ca:,e FLD2004-04026 - Page I Proposal: The applicant IS proposmg 13 attached umts and SIX hotel sUItes Within a 49-foot hIgh buddmg The maximum density for thIs SIte IS 19 dwellmg uruts or 26 hotel rooms The proposed front setback reduction and bwldmg heIght increase are necessary m order to fit the proposed mIxed use of multi-fanuly resIdential umts and hotel urnts on thIs site There IS only one setback reductIOn requested and It IS mInor (6 03 feet to back of curb at the front of the site) considenng that the setback to buddmg IS 20 21 feet The Development ReVIew Comnuttee (ORC) can consider budding height deviatIOns up to 50 feet The applIcatIOn IS before the CommunIty Development Board as a mIxed use Comprehensive IOOll Redevelopment Project applIcation Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding enforcement Issues assocIated With thIS site STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: (Section 2-801.1 and 2-802): STANDARD PROPOSED CONSISTENT lNCONSISTENT MAXIMUM 13 attached umts and SIX hotel rooms X DENSIlY (maximum of 19 dwelling units or 26 hotel rooms) IMPERVIOUS 057 X SURFACE RATIO (ISR) (maximum ISR is .95) LOT AREA (10,000 o 66acres, 28,904 square feet X square feet is minimum requirement) LOT WIDTH (100 120 feet X feet minimum reauired) FRONT SETBACK 603 feet at closest point (to X* (15 feet minimum pavement) required) REAR SETBACK (20 20 feet X feet . . mIDlmum reQ u iremenO SIDE SETBACK (10 West 10 feet (to pavement) X feet . . East 20 feet (to pavement) mlDlmum requirement) HEIGHT (35 - 100 49 feet from BFE X* feet allowable FLD ranl!:e) PARKING SPACES 30 spaces, 1 8 spaces per umt (multl- X (27 per unit required) fannly) and 1 space per urut (hotel) * See analYSIS above for dIscussion Staff Report - Cornmuruty Development Board - September 21, 2004 - Case FLD2004-04026 - Page 2 COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBlLITY CRITERIA (Sections 2-803.C): Consistent Inconsistent 1 The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for X development IS othefWlse impractical without deVIations from the use, mtenSltv and development standards 2 The development of the parcel proposed for development as a X Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project wIll not reduce the falr market value of abuttmg propertIes 3 The uses WithIn the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are X othefWlse permttted III the City of Clearwater 4 The use or ITIlX of uses Wlthm the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment X Project IS compauble with adjacent land uses 5 The development of the parcel proposed for development, as a X Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project wdl upgrade the mnnediate vtcimty of the parcel proposed for development 6 The deSign of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment X Project creates a form and, functlOn that enhances the commumty character of the immedIate vicimty of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole 7 FleXIbility m regard to lot width, requITed setbacks, height and off- X street park:mg are Justified by the benefits to commumty character and the immedIate viclmty of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole 8 Adequate off-street parkmg in the ImmedIate VICInIty accordmg to the X shared parking formula III DIVIsion 14 of Article 3 WIll be aVallable to aVOid on-street parkmg m the Immediate vlcmlty of the parcel proposed for development StdffReport - CornmlUllty Development Board - September 21, 2004 - Case FLD2004-04026 - Page 3 COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS Section 3-913 : Consistent Inconsistent 1 x x 2 x 3 x 4 5 of the x X 6 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development ReView Committee reviewed the apphcatlOn and supporting matenals at its meeting on August 18, 2004 The Plannmg Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development applIcation of a mIxed use development for 13 multI-famIly residentIal umts and SlX hotel umts With a reductIOn of the front (south) setback, along Bayway Boulevard, from 15 feet to 603 feet (to pavement), and a buddmg height mcrease from 35 feet to 49 feet from base flood elevation (plus roof appurtenances), as a Comprehensive InfiII Redevelopment Project, under the proVIsIOns of SecTIon 2-803 C with the followmg bases and conditions Bases for Approval I The proposal complies wIth the FleXIble Development critena as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per SectIon 2-803 C 2 The proposal IS in compliance With other standards III the Code mcludmg the General Apphcabdlty Cntena per SectIOn 3-913 3 The development IS compatible With the surroundmg area and wIll enhance other redevelopment efforts Conditions of Approval 1 That the final deSIgn and color of the buddmg be consistent With the conceptual elevations subnutted to, or as modIfied by, the CDB, 2 That all FIre Department requirements be met pnor to the Issuance of any bUIldmg pefmIts, 3 That the National Fife ProtectIon AssociatIon (NFPA) 303 standards for "mannas and boatyards" be met to the satIsfaCTIon of the F lIe Department pnor to the Issuance of any butldmg permIts, 4 That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid pnor to the Issuance of any buddmg penruts, 5 That dumpster service With the City of Clearwater be arranged pnor to buildmg permIt Issuance, 6 That the Imgatton plan sheet be revlsed to the satisfaction of CIty Planning Staff, pnor to any buddmg penmt Issuance, 7 That all storm water, water, and sewer deSign standards of the Engmeenng Department be met pnor bUlldmg pefmIt Issuance, Staff Report - Commuruty Development Board - September 21, 2004 - Case FLD2004-04026 - Page 4 8 Traffic Impact fees are to be determined and paId pnor to Certificate of Occupancy, 9 That the condonumum plat be recorded pnor to the issuance of the first CertIficate of !fII Occupancy, 1 D That boats moored at the docks be for the exclusIve use by the resIdents and/or guests of the condommlUms and not be pemutted to be sub-leased separately from the condonumums, It That covered boat hfts be prohIbited (uncovered boat lifts may be reViewed at an admmistrattve level proVided that all requirements of Section 3-601 are met), 1).- That all applIcable requIrements of Chapter 39 of the BUIldmg Code be met related to seawall setbacks, 1) That floatmg and dock-supported signage be permanently mstalled contammg wordmg warmng boaters of the eXIstence of protected sea grasses and manatees III the VICInlty, and 1 ~ That the monument Sign be lmllted to SIX feet m height and be conSistent With the archItecture and color of the building Prepared by Planmng Department Staff )7-t l' c/l.-4"~ h . tZe..c-~ Michael H Reynolds, AICP, Planner III ATTACHMENTS Aenal Photograph of Site and VIcmity LocatIOn Map Future Land Use Map Zomng Atlas Map ApplIcation S \Plannmg DepaT/men/IC D B\FLEX\Pendmg cases\Up for the nerl CDBIBayway 850 Almmar (1) 921 04 CDBlBayway 850 Almmar Staff Report doc Staff Report - Commuruty Development Board - September 21, 2004 - Ca~e FLD2004-04026 - Page 5 f'- w./ ctf' 7-u:;; ~ "'A~~ /~4p(7)m Itp;f ~ "/;llJrIU'4/fy ~ ~ ~ /..ht/~ ~ f/ ~h-,,/ 4-/7'.,.- ~ /'. P.~4) ~V- 6YO'Z.b "S:d SAyw~ ,OJ,...(//). 1'd4,.."'~ A/AA/ >-- FleXIble Development approval of a ltllXed use development for 13 - '- multi-family residential uruts Jand six hotel units Wlth_ a reduction of ~ the front (south) setback, along Bayway Boulevard, from 15 feet to '--- 603 feet (to pavement), and a buildmg heIght mcrease from 35 feet .... '--- to 49 feet from base flood elevatIOn (plus roof appurtenances), as a .' Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the proVIsIons of - Section 2-803 C . , -.!b!,I1..l-1' G-"~_6 W......?_EeJ.,.,&. .,e::~_~ L~eU- -~"""~~r .c~-U':rL ...dA/.JfU.>"".b~ AAr~ ,---L-'';'4-~e,r 4~_~u-u" -a-: ,,~ _bJ...# 4. / r' 7b b. . oj ~ 7/J-6..LUc_o;; I -4~.' _ ell..""J~ '):,:A4''t. )L--A~ ''-Nr ~.f'L-~ ~ l / WOtt~~+--a.e_A_<.ba o~Jt._&-~_.cJ c:;,y.e._ ~ltkf- L-M-/-jL-dVA_~WJ-I-L ~4~ 7?~cu~~lJ:_ '< 2.701 COiV1MUN ITY lll~ VI~LOf'M FNT CODb 2 The llse of the parcel proposed fOI devel- opmen t cloes not Involve anlJl1dl c.onfine- ment facilities that clre open to the out- SHle .3 Lot (ZI rn Cind 1I11dth The reductiOn 111 lot ,Hea ancl width will not result III a bulid- mg wllH..h IS out of scale wIth eXlstll1g bluldlllgs Hl. the Immediate VICltuty of the pru eel pIoposed fOI development 4 Side and I em setbac!l a The red uctlOn 111 "Ide andJOl 1 (,,11' setback docs not prevent access to the le,lr of any butldmg by emel- gt'I1CY velllc.les b The redudlOl1 111 side ,lnd/Oi I e,lr setback results III an Imploved site plan, more efficIent parklllg, 01 Ull- piOved de<:ilgn and .lppearclllce and landsc,lped arerl<, are III excess of the minim lUU 1 equlreci 5 FI on l setbacfl The reductiOn 111 front set- back results In an unproved sIte plan or uuproved deSign and appearJnce (01 d No b526-00, ~ 1,6-15-00, Ord No 6680-01, ~ el, 1-6-01, Ord No 6928-02, ~~ 15, 16, 5-2-02, 01 d No 7] 06-03, ~ 1, 9-18-03) DrVISION 8 TOURIs'r DISTRICT ("T") Section 2-801. Intent and purpo5e. The 111 tent and pu rpose of the TOUIIS t D 1St! J(. t ("T") ]S to provide a safe and attractIve tOUlISt destlna tlOn 111 the City of Cleru W <lter with ..1 fu II complement of tounst accommoclatlOns and COI1- venlent Jecess to goods and <;el\fICeS SectIOn 2-801.1. MaXimum dC'velopment po- tential. The TOllJ 1St DIstrIct ("T") may he ]owtE'(] In more than one land use (.,[legory It IS the mtent 01 the T Dlstnct that development be consIStent with the CountYWide Future Land U<;e Plan as I eq lllrecl by stn te 13 W TllP develop men t po tC' n tJ ,il of a pcl1 cel of !::Ind WithIn the T DIStllct ..,h,lll be detez ffimed by the c;Llndarcls found 111 this Devel- opment Code [1<; well [IS the CountYWide Future L,mcl Use DesIgnatIOn of the plOpOl ty FCll t hoc.,e pell ce Is \VI th 111 the T D IStllet th at ha \Ie an .ll ea withIn the boundalles of and governed by <l "'P(>- cwl area plan approved by the City CommiSSiOn ,me! the CountYWide Planmng Authonty, maxI- mum development potentIal shall be as set fO! Lh for e,lch classIfIcatIOn of use and locatIon III the approved plan Development potential for the CountYWide FutUle L,lnd Use Deslgn,ltIons thdL apply to the T D1Stllct are as fonows ) I OIl"IIIJ!II/ ( mtnl,.,pule I'lllloe M(lIl1ltllllt IJr"~II'iI,, UIIl/' M,,, 111111'" 1</001 '~I I (I nul'" I A, (OIHJII",flllu"" f.."'lIf (I,,, 1)( "~IIIIII()II /WI Arlo "I f..llllrI (III)!' IIJlOII' ,'>111 ('11<' RullO Uml, I)" All ~ I~{ ~o, r I" I< illIl~~ I !Ig-h 10 dw( II "g \11\lk~ [1('1 ,l() (' I~i\ I{ I Oil S It <)'} ~O IIll1l... IH'I ,l( H' (Old No 6"i2G-OO, q 1,6-15-00, Orcl No 6680-01, ~ 7, /1-5-01) HeLLIOn ~-80~ FleXible standard develop- ment. The lolIowlllg u<;e", me Level One pf'rnuttec1 (1::'('>' III tlw T Dli:>t! jct Sll bJecl 1..0 the stand ,11 d" ilnd Cll!('lld ,>ct out III thiS sectIOn and other appllc,l- hie j1IOVI "Ions of 1\ I tIde 3 c "PI' \'0) II CD2G'1 ~, ZONING DISTRICTS ~ 2-802 Thble 2.802 "T" DlStru:t Flexible Standard Development Standards Mm Lot Mm Lot Max. Area Width Height Mm Setbacks Mm. Off-Street Use (sq ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) DensIty Parkmg Front Sule Rear Accessory DwellIngs nla nla nla nla nla nla 30 Units! llwut acre Alcohohc Beverage Sales 5,000 50 35 10--15 10 20 nla 5 per 1,000 GFA Attached Dwellmgs 10,000 100 35-50 10--15 10 10--20 30 umtsl 1 5 per umt acre Governmental Uses(ll 10,000 100 35-50 10--15 0--10 10--20 nla 3----411,000 GFA Indoor RecreationlEntertaUl- 5,000 50 35-100 0~15 0--10 20 nla 10 per 1,000 GFA ment MedIcal ClIme 10,000 100 30--50 10--15 10 20 20 2-----311,000 GFA Nightclubs 5,000 50 35 15 10 20 nla 10 per 1,000 GFA Non-ResIdentIal Off-Street nla nla nla 25 5 10 nla nla ParJung Offices 10,000 100 35-50 10--15 0--10 10--20 nla 3--4 spaces per 1,000 GFA 2 5 spaces per 1,000 sq ft of lot area or Outdoor RecreatIonIEnter- as determIned by tamment 5,000 50 35 10--15 10 20 Dla the OOlIllIlumty de- velopment dIrector based on ITE Man- ualstandards Overmght AccommodatIOns 20,000 100-150 35-50 10--15 0--10 10--20 40 rooms/ 1 per umt acre ParkIng Garages and Lots 20,000 100 50 15~25 10 10--20 Dla nla 1 per 20,000 SF land area or as de- Parks and RecreatIon Facili- termmed by the bes nla nla 50 25 10 20 nla commumty develop- ment coordmator based on ITE Man- ualstandards PublIc TransportatIon Facllt- nla nla 10 nla nla nla nla nla tIes(2 ) SIdewalk Vendors nla nla nla nla nla nla nla nla Restaurants 5,000-- 50--100 25-35 10--15 0--10 10~20 nla 7-15 spaces per 10,000 1,000 GFA Retatl Sales and Servu:es 5,000- 50--100 35--50 10--15 0--10 10--20 nla 4-5 spaces per to,OOo 1,000 GFA SOCIal and Commumty Center 5,000~ 50~100 35--50 10--15 0--10 10--20 nia 4-5 spaces per 10,000 1,000 GFA UttlItylInfrastructure Faclh- nia nia nla 25 10 10 nla nJa bes(3) Supp No 6 CD2 65 ~ 2-802 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE (1) Governmental uses shall not exceed five acres Any such use, alone or when added to contIguous like uses whIch exceed five acres shall reqwre a land use plan map amendment to InstItutIonal whIch shall Include such uses and all contiguous hke uses (2) Pubhc transportatIOn facIlIties shall not exceed three acres Any such use, alone or when added to contiguous hke uses wh1ch exceed three acres shall reqwre a land use plan map amendment to TransportatIonlUtlhty which shall Include such uses and all contiguous lIke uses_ (3) Ub.htylinfrastructure uses shall not exceed three acres Any such use, alone or when added to contiguous h:...e uses which exceed three acres shall reqUIre a land use plan map amendment to TransportabonlUtility whtch shall Include such uses and all contIguous l1ke uses Flexibility criteria: A Alcohobc beverage sales 1 Locatwn. a The parcel proposed for development IS not contlguous to a parcel of land whIch IS designated as resldentlalill the Zomng Atlas, b The use of the parcel proposed for development will not Involve direct access to a major artenaI street, c. The deSign of all bmldmgs complIes With the Thunst District deSIgn gUIde.- lines In DIVIsion 5 of Article 3 2 Front setback' a. The reduchon in front setback con- tnbutes to a more active and dy- namIC street hfe, b The reduch.on ill front setback re- sults In an unproved SIte plan or rmproved deSIgn or appearance. B Attached dwellmgs 1 Hetght a. The Illcreased heIght results III an Improved SIte plan or Improved de- SIgn and appearance, b The Increased heIght IS necessary to allow the Improvement of off-street parlung on the ground floor of the resldenttal bUlldmg Park mg. Off-street parlung Wlthm the footpnnt of the reSIdential bwldmg IS deSigned and constructed to create a street level facade comparable to the archltec- 2 Supp No 6 CD2 66 ~ tural character and firnshes of a residen~ tial bwldmg Without parlong on the ground level, 3 Locatwn The use of the parcel proposed for development will not Involve direct access to a major artenaI street, 4 Setbacks: a. The reduction ill front setback con~ tnbutes to a more actIve and dy- nanuc street life, b. The reductlon In front setback re- sults in an rmproved site plan or improved deSIgn and appearance; c The reduch.on in rear setback does not prevent access to the rear of any brnldmg by emergency veh1cles; d The reduction in rear setback re.- sults in an unproved SIte plan, more effiCIent parlnng or unproved deSIgn and appearance, e_ The reduch.on 1ll rear setback does not reduce the amount oflandscaped area otherwIse reqUIred_ 5 The deSIgn of all bUlldmgs comphes WIth the Thunst Dlstnct deSign gwdehnes in DIVISion 5 of ArtIcle 3 \~ .~-~~ C Governmental uses 1 Hezght The mcreased height results in an improved SIte plan or Improved deSign and appearance, 2 Stgns No sign of any lund IS designed or located so that any portIOn of the SIgn IS more than SIX feet above the finIshed grade of the front lot hne of the parcel ZONING DISTRICTS ~ 2-802 proposed for development Wlless such D. Indoor recreation I entertamment signage IS a part of an approved compre- 1 The desIgn of all buildings complies WIth heusIve SIgn program, the Tounst DIstrict deSIgn gUldelin.es 10 3 Locatwn. The use of the parcel proposed DIVISIon 5 of Article 3. for development will not mvolve drrect 2 Setbacks access to a major artenal street, The reduction In front setback con- a 4 Setbacks' trIbutes to a more actIve and dy- a. The reduction ill front setback con- nannc street hfe, tnbutes to a more actJ.ve and dy- b. The reduction In front setback re- namic street life, suIts m an lDlproved deSIgn and aIr b. The reductton m front setback re- pearance, sults ill an tmproved site plan or c The reduction m SIde setback does tmproved desIgn and appearance, not prevent access to the rear of any c The reductton in SIde and rear set- building by emergency velncles; back does not prevent access to the d. The reduction 10 SIde setback results rear of any bwldmg by emergency in an improved site plan, more efli- velncles; dent parkmg or lDlproved deSIgn d. The reductton ill Slde and rear set- and appearance. back results ill an lDlproved SIte plan, e. The reductton in side setback results more efficient parlung or improved ill landscaped areas in excess of the "''''''~L.'...-j deSIgn and appearance, mmimum reqUIred. e. The reductJ.on m side and rear set- 3 Hezght The mcreased height results in an back does not reduce the amount of Improved site plan or lDlproved deSIgn landscaped area otherwtse reqwred and appearance 5. Off-street parkmg E. Medtcal clmtc. a Adequate parking IS avwlable on a 1 The use of the parcel proposed for devel- shared basIS as determmed by all opment 18 compatlble with surroundmg eXlStmg land uses Wlthm 1,000 feet propertaes of parcel proposed for development, or parkmg IS available through any 2 Off-street park mg. extStmg or planned and COmmItted a Adequate parkIng IS available on a parlnng facilibes or the shared park- shared baSIS as determIned by all illg formula 10 ArtIcle 2, DIVISIOn 14, eXIStIng land uses WlthIn 1,000 feet b The phYSICal charactensttcs of a pro- of the parcel proposed for develop- posed bUIldIng are such that the ment, or parking is avallable through lIkely uses of the property will re-- any eXlstmg or planned and commIt- qUlred fewer parlong spaces per floor ted parkmg facilitIes or the shared area than otherwlse reqwred or that parkIng formula in Arttcle 2, DIVI- the use of sIgmficant portIons of the SlOn 14; building will be used for storage or b The phYSIcal charactenstIcs of a pro- other non-parkIng demand~generat- posed building are such that the ing purposes hkely uses of the property wdl re- 6 The design of all bmldmgs complIes Wlth qmre fewer parkIng spaces per floor the 'Thunst Dlstnct deSIgn guidehnes 10 area than otbeI'Wlse reqmred or that DIVISIon 5 of ArtIcle 3 the use of sIgOlficant pomons of the Supp No 6 CD2 67 ~ 2--802 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE bulldmg wIll be used for storage or posed for development and the parcel on other non-parkIng demand-generat- wmch the non-resIdentIal use wluch wIll iug purposes be served by the off-street parkmg spaces 3 Front setback 3 Off-street parkmg spaces are screened by a The reductIon In front setback con- a wall or fence of at least four feet lD tnbutes to a more actIve and dy- height whIch IS landscaped on the exter- namlC street hfe, nal SIde WIth a contInuous hedge or non- b The reductIon In front setback re- deCiduous Ville suIts m an improved site plan or 4 All outdoor hghtmg IS automatically lIDproved design and appearance sWItched to turn off at 9 00 P ill 4 Hetght The increased heIght results lD an 5 All parkmg spaces shall be surface park- rmproved Site plan or rmproved desIgn or mg appearance The desIgn of all butldmgs comphes with 6 F Ntghtclubs the Tounst DIstnct design guidelInes lD 1 Locatwn DIVISIon 5 of .Article 3 The parcel proposed for development IS not contIguous to a parcel of land wluch is deSignated as reSIdentIal In the Zomng Atlas, The use of the parcel proposed for development wtll not Involve direct access to a major arterial street, 2. The deSIgn of all buildings comphes With the Thunst Dlstnct deSIgn guidelines In DIVISIon 5 of .Article 3 a b G Non-resldentlal off-street parkmg 1 The parcel proposed for development IS contiguous to the parcel on which the non-resIdential use wluch wtll be served by the off-street parking spaces, 18 located and has a common boundary of at least 25 feet, or the parcel proposed for develop- ment IS located ImmedIately across a pub- he road from the nou-residentJ.al use wluch WIll be served by the off-street parking spaces, prOVided that access to the off- street parkmg does not lDvolve the use of local streets wluch have reSIdentIal Units on both Sides of the street 2 No off-street parkmg spaces are located In the reqmred front setback for detached dwelhngs In the T DistrIct or wlthm ten feet, whIchever IS greater, or wIthm (10) feet of a SIde or rear lot hne, except along the common boundary of the parcel pro- Supp No 6 CD2 68 H Offices. 1 The use of the parcel proposed for devel- opment fronts on but will not mvolve d1rect access to a major artenal street, 2 All signage 18 a part of the comprehensIve sign program; ~ 3 The design of all butldmgB comphes With the Thunst Dlstnct deSIgn guidehnes m Arttcle 3 DIViSIon 5 4 Setbacks a The reductton In front setback con- tnbutes to a more actlve and dy- namlC streethfe; b The reductIon m front setback re- sults m an unproved BIte plan or rmproved deSIgn and appearance, c The reductlOn ill SIde and rear set- backs does not prevent access to the rear of any bUIldmg by emergency vehicles, d The reductIon III SIde and rear set- backs results m an rmproved SIte plan, more effiCIent park10g or 1m. proved deSIgn and appearance, e The reductlOn In Side and rear set- backs results In landscaped areas 10 excess of the mmnnum reqUIred ZONING DISTRICTS ~ 2-802 \ ~ 5 Off-street parkmg a Adequate parking IS avaIlable on a shared basIs as determmed by all eXIstIng land uses WIthIn 1,000 feet of parcel proposed for development, or parkIng IS available through any exIStIng or planned and COID.Illltted parkmg facIlItIes or the shared park- mg formula in ArtIcle 2, DIVISIon 14, b The physical charactenstics of a pro- posed bmldmg are such that the hkely uses of the property will re- qmre fewer parkIng spaces per floor area than otherwlSe required or that the use of SIgnificant portIons of the building will be used for storage or other non-parking demand-generat~ mg purposes 6. Hezght. The Increased heIght results In an improved SIte plan or improved desIgIl and appearance 1. Outdoor recreatwn I entertainment. L The parcel proposed for development is not contiguous to a parcel ofland wluch IS designated as reSIdentIal m the Zomng Atlas, 2 All sIgnage is a part of a comprehensIVe sIgn program; 3 Sound amplificatIon IS designed and con- structed to ensure that no ampbfied sound can be heard to the extent that the sound IS recognizable m terms of the meaning of words or melody when wind condib.ons are less than ten mIles per hour at a dIstance of more than 100 feet ill all dIrectIons or when Wllld condItIons are ten mIles per hour or greater at a dIstance of more than 150 feet in all dIrections, 4 All outdoor lIghting IS deSIgned and con- structed so that no lIght falls cbrectly on land other than the parcel proposed for development, 5. The deSIgn of all butldmgs comphes WIth the Thunst DIstnct deSIgn guidelInes m DIVISIOn 5 of ArtIcle 3 Supp No 6 CD2 69 6. Front setback a. The reductIon In front setback con- tnhutes to a more active dynamIC street Me; b The reductIon m front setback re- suIts In an Improved SIte plan or Improved design and appearance Off-street parkmg a. Adequate parkIng IS available on a shared basIS as determmed by all existIng land uses withm 1,000 feet of the parcel proposed for develop- ment, or parkmg is avw.1able through any eXIsting or planned and comnut- ted parlong fact.htIes or the shared parking formula In ArtIcle 2, DIVI- SlOn 14, or b The physIcal characteristics of a pro- posed bwlding are such that the hkely uses of the property will re- qUIre fewer parkIng spaces per floor area than otherwise reqUIred or that the use of sIgmficant portiOIlB of the bmlding are used for storage or other non-parkIng demand-generating pur- poses 7. J Overnight accommodatwns 1 Locatwn' The use of the parcel proposed for development will not mvolve chrect access to a major arterial street, 2. He"Lght. Tlie mcreased hel-ght results In an improved SIte plan and/or rmproved de- SIgn and appearance, 3. StgnS. No SIgn of any kind IS designed or located so that any porbon of the sign IS more than six feet above the finIshed grade of the front lot hne of the parcel proposed for development unless such sign age IS a part of an approved compre- henSIve SIgn program; 4. Setbacks: 8. The reductlon In front setback con- tnbutes to a more actIve and dy- nannc street hfe, ~ 2-802 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE b The reductlOn In front setback re- G There IS an unmet eXlSting demand for suIts m an unproved site plan or add1bonal parkmg m the ImmedIate vi- ..- unproved deSIgn and appearance, ciruty of the parcel proposed for develop- The reduction m Side and rear set~ ment; c backs does not prevent access to the 7. Construction of a parkIng structure would rear of any bwldmg by emergency not otherwIse be phYSically feasible; vehicles; 8 The front and rear setbacks wluch are d The reGuctIon m Side and rear set- proVlded are Improved as an arcade or backs results III an rmproved Site With other active pedestnan/commerClal plan, more efficient parkmg or Im- areas for sidewalk. cafes, Sidewalk ven- proved des~gn and appearance, dors, street furniture or urban amemtIes; e The reductIon In Side and rear set- 9 The design of all bmldings complies With backs does not reduce the amount of the '!burlst Distnct deSign guldebnes m landscaped area otherwise reqwred ThvislOn 5 of Article 3 5 The design of all bwld1ngs complies With 10. Front setback: the Thunst Distnct deSign guidelines III a. The reductIon m front setback con- DiVlSion 5 of ArtIcle 3 tnbutes to a more active dynamic 6 Lot wldth: The reduction m lot Width will street life, not result In a bull.ding which IS out of b. The reductlon ill front setback. re- scale with eXIStIng bwldmgs m the rmme- suIts In an Improved Site plan or dlate Vlcimty of the parcel proposed for unproved deSIgn and appearance development ~ Parkmg garages and lots 11 Rear setback K The reductIon in rear setback does a. 1 The parcel proposed for development IS not prevent access to the rear of any not contIguous to land deSignated as res- bwldmg by emergency vemcles, IdentIal in the Zonmg Atlas; b The reductIon ill rear setback. re- 2. Access to and from the parkmg garage or suIts in an rmproved site plan" more lot shall be based on the findmgs of a effiCient parkmg or rmproved design transportatlon analysIS approved by the and appearance, CIty; c. The reductIon In rear setback. re- 3 The stack:mg spaces avwlable for cars suIts m landscaping m excess of the W81tIng to pass through a parlang ticket minimum requrred. dispensable or booth to enter the garage L Parks and recreatton factltttes or lot shall be based on the deSign and size of the garage or 101" 1 The proposed use IS compatIble With the 4. Any frontage along a public street IS land- surroundmg properties. scaped or deSIgned to be sumlar ill char- 2 Off-street parlang IS screened from adJa- acter and use to other uses frontIng on cent parcels of land and any street by a each street for a mstance of 250 feet In landscaped wallar fence of at least four either drrechon along the street or the feet III heIght nearest mtersectlOns, whIchever IS less, All outdoor lIghtmg IS deSIgned so that no Parlang structures are designed, con- 3 5 light fIxtures cast light directly on adJa- structed and firushed so that the struc- cent land used for reSidentIal proposes ture of the garage IS architecturally com- Off-street parkmg Adequate parkmg IS patlble the deSIgn and character of adjacent 4 pnnclpal uses, available on a shared baSIS as determmed Supp No 6 CD2 70 ZONING DISTRICTS ~ 2-802 ~ by all existing land uses WIthIn 1,000 square feet of the parcel proposed for development, or parking IS aV81lahle through any exIstmg or planned and com- nntted parkIng facilitIes or the shared parkmg formula m Article 3, ThVlslon 14 M. Publtc transportatlOn facLlttzes 1 The pubhc transportation facilitIes are not located withm 1,000 feet of another pubhc transportatIOn facility unless nee. essary to serve established transit stops with demonstrated nderslup demand, 2 The pubhc transportation facilities are deSIgned, located and landscaped so that the structure of the facilihes are screened from view from any residenhal use or land designated as reSldenhal in the Zon- mg Atlas; 3 All hghting asSOCIated with the pubhc transportabon facilibes is designed and located so that no hght IS cast directly on any res1dential use or land deSignated as resldenhal m the Zomng Atlas, 4 The deslgn.of all bwldings complies WIth the '.Iburist Distnct design gmdelmes in DIVlSlon 5 of Article 3. N Restaurants 1. Lot ar2a and wtdth The reduction ill lot area will not result in a buLldmg which is out of scale with ensbng bUlldmgs in the unmediate VlcinIty of the parcel proposed for development, 2 Location The use of the parcel proposed for development WIll not mvolve direct access to a major arterial street; 3. Hetght The mcreased heIght results In an unproved site plan andlor Improved de- SIgn and appearance, 4 Stgns No Sign of any kmd is deSigned or located so that any portIon of the Sign is more than SIX feet above the fimshed grade of the front lot hne of the parcel proposed for development unless such slgnage IS a part of an approved compre- henSIve Sign program, Supp No 6 CD2 71 5 Setbacks' a The reductIon in front setback con- tnbutes to a more actIve and dy- nanuc street hfe, b The reducbon 111 front setback re- sults 111 an unproved Site plan or unproved deSign and appearance, c The reductIon In Side and rear set- backs does not prevent access to the rear of any bwldmg by emergency vehIcles, d The reduction m Side and rear set- backs results m an Improved SIte plan, more effiCIent parkIng or im. proved deSign and appearance; e The reduction m SIde and rear set- backs does not reduce the amount of landscaped area othelWlSe required 6. Off-street parkmg: a. The physical charactenstIcs of a pro- posed bwldmg are such that the hkely uses of the property will re~ quire fewer parkIng spaces per floor area than othelWlse reqwred or that the use of Slgmficant portions of the building will be used for storage or other non-parkIng demand-generat- mg purposes; b Adequate off-street parktng IS avaIl- able on a shared basIS as deternuned by all exLSting land uses WIthIn 1,000 feet of the parcel proposed for devel- opment, or parkmg IS available through any existIng or planned and cOmIDltted parkmg facilitIes or the shared parkIng formula m Article 2, DiVISion 14; c Fast food restaurants shall not be ehgtble for a reductIOn m the num. ber of off.street parktng spaces 7. The design of all bwldmgs comphes WIth the 'Ibunst DIStnCt deSign gUldelmes In DIVISIon 5 of ArtIcle 3 o Retatl sales and servwes 1. Lot area and wtdth The reductIon ill lot area Will not result m a bwldmg wluch 18 ~ 2..s02 COMMUNITY DEVEWPMENT CODE out of scale wtth eXlstIng bmldIngs In the Inunewate VlClruty of the parcel proposed for development, 2 Locatwn' The use of the parcel proposed for development WIll not mvolve direct access to a major artenal street, 3 Retght The Ulcreased heIght results Ul an unproved Sit~ plan or improved deSign and appearance; 4. Setbacks a The reduction In front setback con- tnbutes to a more active and dy- nannc street Me, b The reductton In front setback re- sults in an unproved site plan or unproved deSign and appearance, c. The reduction LD sIde and rear set- backs does not prevent access to the rear of any bmldmg by emergency vehicles, d The reductlOu LD side and rear set- backs results lD an rmproved site plan, more efficient parkmg or Im- proved deSIgn and appearance, e The reductton In side and rear set- backs does not reduce the amount of landscaped area otherwise reqwred, Off-street parkmg a The phySical charactensttcs of a pro- posed bmldmg are such that the hkely uses of the property will re- qurre fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherWIse requITed or that the use of signrlicant portlOns of the budding will Oe used for storage or other non-parkmg demand-generat- mg purposes, b Adjacent land uses are of a nature that there is a high probablhty that patrons WIll use modes of transpor- tatlOn other than the automobile to access the use, 5. c Adequate parkmg IS avaIlable on a shared baSIS as determmed by all eXlstmg land uses wlthm 1,000 feet of the parcel proposed for develop- Supp No 6 s! ment, or parkmg 18 available through any eXlstIng or planned and comnut- ted parkmg facurhes or the shared parkIng formula m Article 2, DIVI- SIOn 14 6 The deSign of all buildings compiles with the Tounst DIStrict deSIgn gwdelmes In DivisIon 5 of ArtIcle 3 P Su1ewalk vendors 1 The locabon of the sIdewalk vendor does not rmparr pedestnan movement 2 The land occupIed by a sidewalk vendor IS not deSIgnated or used for reqUired off- street parking. Q. Social and commumty center 1 The parcel proposed for development does not abut any property deSIgnated as res- IdentJ.al m the Zoning Atlas. 2 Front setback The reduction m front set. back results m an rmproved Site plan or ~ unproved design and appearance. 3. SuJe and rear setback' The reduction In SIde and/or rear setback is necessary to preserve protected trees and/or results m an rmproved site plan or more effiClent deSign and appearance and results in landscapmg in excess of the mmunum required. R UulLty I mfrastructure facLlttU!s. 1 Any above ground structure other than permItted telecommumcatIon towers and ubllty dIstnbution hnes located on or along a rear lot hue shall he screened from VIew by a landscaped opaque waIl or fence which IS at least two-trurds the heIght of the above ground structure and shall be landscaped Wlth trees which five years after InstallatIon substantIally wtll obscure the fence or wall and the above ground structure, 2 The deSIgn of all buIldmgs complies wtth the TourIst DIStrIct deSign gUldehnes m DIVlsIon 5 of ArtIcle 3 (Ord No 6526-00, ~ 1,6+15-00; Ord No 6928-02, ~9 17-20,5-2-02) CD2 72 ZONING DISTRICTS ~ 2-803 Section 2-803. Flexible development. The followmg uses are Level Two per:lD..ltted uses per:lD..ltted 1n the Tounst "T" DlBtnct subject to the standards and cntena set out In tIus sectIOn and other apphcable proVISIOns of Article 3 Table 2-803 "T" Flexible Development Standards Mm Lot Mm Lot Max.. Mm Mm Area Width Height Front Mm St.de Rear Mm.. Off-Street Use (sq ft) (ft) (ft ) (ft) (ft) (ft ) Density Parking AlcoholIc Beverage Sales 5,000 50 35~100 0-15 0-10 10---20 nia 5 per 1,000 GFA Attached Dwe11mgs 5,000- 50-lOa 35-100 0--15 0-10 10-20 30 umtsl 1 5 per umt 10,000 acre Determllled by the 30 umtsl commumty devel- ComprehewlIve Infill acre, 40 opment coordwator nia nia nia nia nia nia based on the spe- Redevelopment Projeet(l) rooms! Clfic use and/or acre ITE Manual stan~ dards Lumted Velucle Sales and 5,000 50 35--100 0-15 0-10 10-20 nia 4---5 spaces per Dtsplay 1,000 GFA Manna Facilibes 5,000 50 25 10-15 0-10 10-20 nia 1 space per 2 slIps NIghtclubs 5,000 50 35-100 0-15 0-10 10--20 nia 10 per 1,000 GFA Offices 10,000 100 35-100 0-15 0-10 10-20 nia 3-4 spaces per 1,000 GFA 25 spaces per 1,000 SQ FI' oflot area or as deter- Outdoor RecreatlOnlEnter- 5,000 50 35 5-15 0---10 10---20 nia nnned by the com- tmnment mumty develop- ment cooromator based on ITE Man- ual standards Overmght .AccQmmodatlOllS 10,000- 100-150 35-100 0-15 0-10 0-20 40 rooms! 1 per umt 20,000 acre Restaurants 5,000- 50-100 25~100 0-15 0-10 10-20 nia 7~15 spaces per 10,000 1,000 GFA Retail sales and servIceS 5,000- 50-lOa 35-100 0-15 0--10 10--20 nia 4---5 spaces per 10,000 1,000 GFA __ ~...l (1) Any use approved for a ComprehensIve Infill Redevelopment Project shall be pernntted by the underlymg Future Land Use Plan Map desIgnatIon_ Flexibility criteria: A Alcoholu: beverage sales. 1 Locatwn a The parcel proposed for development IS not contIguous to a parcel of land whIch IS deSIgnated as reSIdentIal In the Zomng Atlas, Supp No 6 b. The use of the parcel proposed for development WIll not Involve direct access to a m::yor artenal street, 2_ HeljJht The increased heIght results In an Improved SIte plan and/or unproved de. SIgn and appearance, 3 Stgns No SIgn of any kInd IS deSigned or located so that any portIon of the sign IS CD2 73 ~ 2-803 COMMUNITY DEVEl!.OPMENT CODE more than SIX feet above the finIshed grade of the front lot Ime of the parcel proposed for development unless the SIgn IS a part of a comprehensive Sign pro- gram; 4 Setbacks a The reduction m front setback con- tnbuteb to a more active and dy- namtC street hfe, b The reductIon in front setback re- sults ill an unproved sIte plan or Improved deSign and appearance, c The reductIon m Side and rear set- back does not prevent access to the rear of any bwldmg by emergency velucles; d The reductIon in SIde and rear set- back results m an unproved Site plan, more effiCIent parlung or Improved deSign and appearance, 5 The design of all bUlldmgs complIes WIth the 1bunst DlStnct deSIgn guIdelines In DIVISion 5 of Arttcle 3 B Attached dwellings. 1. Lot area and wldth The reductIon In lot area will not result ill a butldmg wmch IS out of scale With exIsting bwldmgs m tbe Immedtate VIcrmty of the parcel proposed for development; 2 Locatwn. The use of the parcel proposed for development will not mvolve direct access to an artena! street, 3 Helght a The illcreased height results In an Improved Site plan or Improved de- SIgn and appearance, b The mcreased height IS necessary to allow the rmprovement of off-street parkmg on the ground floor of the reSidentIal bwldmg, Setbacks 4 a The reductIon III front setback con. tnhutes to a more actIve and dy- namIC street hfe, Supp No 6 CD2 74 b The reduction III front setback re- sults m an Improved Site plan or Improved deSIgn and appearance, c The reductIOn m Side and rear set- back does not prevent access to the rear of any brnldmg by emergency vehicles; d The reductton ill SIde and rear set- back results in an Improved. SIte plan, more effiCient parking or improved design and appearance, .- 5. Off-street parkmg. a The physiCal charactenstics of a pro- posed building are such that the likely uses of the property will re- quae fewer parlang spaces per floor area than otherwtse reqUIred or that the use of SIgnificant pornons of the bwldmg for storage or other noo- parkIng demand-generating purposes or that the nature of the mdiVldual dwelling umts and theJr locatIon is hk.ely to lead to dependency on non- automobile modes of transportatton, b Off-street parlang Within the foot- print of the reSIdential butldmg IS designed and constructed to create a street level facade comparable to the arclutectural character and finIshes of a reSidential bwldmg Without park- lUg on the ground level The deSign of all bwldings comphes With the Tounst Dlstnct deSIgn guldehnes ill DIVISion 5 of Arttcle 3 6 C ComprehensLVe mfiU redevelopment projects 1 The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development IS other- WIse ImpractIcal Without deVIattons from the use, mtenslty and development stan- dards, 2 The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensIve mfill redevelopment project Will not reduce the fair market value of abuttmg properties, ZONING DISTRICTS ~ 2-803 3 The uses witlun the comprehensIve Illfill redevelopment project are otherwIse per~ mitted m the City of Clearwater, 4. The uses or nux of uses WIthIn the com- prehensIve mfill redevelopment project are compatIble With adjacent land uses; 5 Suitable SItes for development or redevel- opment of the uses or IlllX of uses Wlthm the comprehensIve m:fill redevelopment project are not otherwlse av31lable m the CIty of Clearwater, 6_ The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensIve mfill redevelopment project will upgrade the unmediate VlClI11ty of the parcel proposed for development, 7. The design of the proposed comprehen- SIve infi.1l redevelopment project creates a form and function wluch enhances the commumty character of the rmmediate Vlcinity of the parcel proposed for devel- opment and the CIty of Clearwater as a whole, 8. Flexibility III regard to lot Width, required setbacks, heIght and off-street parkIng are Justrlied by the benefits to commumty character and the rmmediate Vlcurity of the parcel proposed for development and the CIty of Clearwater as a whole, 9 Adequate off~street parlnng m the rmme- watevicimty accordmg to the shared park- ing formula m DiVISIon 14 of Artacle 3 will be available to aVOld on-street parking m the unmed18te VlC1l1lty of the parcel pro- posed for development; 10 The deSIgn of all bUlldmgs complIes WIth the Tounst Dlstnct deSIgn gUldelmes III DiVISIon 5 of Article 3 D Lzmzted vehtcle sales and dzsplay 1 The use of the parcel proposed for devel~ opment shall be located III an enclosed structure 2 The use of the parcel proposed for devel- opment shall have no outdoor chsplays Supp No 6 CD275 3. No velucle service shall be proVIded on the parcel proposed for development. E. Manna faczlztzes 1 The parcel proposed for development IS not located m areas Identrlied m the Com- prehensIve Plan as areas of enVIronmen- tal slgmficance mcludmg' a The north end of Clearwater Beach, b Clearwater Harbor grass beds; c Cooper's Point, d Clearwater Harbor spoil islands; e_ Sand Key Park, f. The southern edge of Alligator Lake 2. No commercIal activihes other than the moonng of boats on a rental basis shall be pernntted on any parcel of land which IS contiguous to a parcel of land which IS deSIgnated as residenhal III the Zomng Atlas, unless the marina facility 18 totally screened from VIew from the conhguous land wluch IS designated as residential and the hours of operatIon of the commer- CIal achvihes are limIted to the tlme pe- riod between aunnse and sunset; 3 Setbacks a The reduchon III front setback con- tnbutes to a more achve and dy- nannc street hfe, b The reduction in front setback re- sults m an rmproved SIte plan or unproved design and appearance, c The reduction m SIde and rear set- back does not prevent access to the rear of any bwlding by emergency vehlCles, d The reductlOn m SIde and rear set- back results m an Improved SIte plan, more effiCIent parkIng or unproved deSIgn and appearance 4 The deSIgn of all bUlldmgs comphes WIth the Thunst Thstnct deSIgn gmdehnes In DIVlslon 5 of ArtIcle 3 5 All manna facIlIties shall comply with the commerClal dock reqUlrements set forth ~ 2-803 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE In SectlOn 3-601 C 3 and the manna and 2. manna facilitIes reqmrements set forth In SectIon 3-603 F Ntghtclubs 1. Locatwn' a The parcel proposed for development is not cc~tIguous to a parcel of land 3 whIch is desIgnated as resIdentIal In the Zoning Atlas, b The use of the parcel proposed for 4 development will not mvolve dIrect access to a major artenal street, 2 Hetght The illcreased heIght results 10 an improved SIte plan and/or unproved de- SIgn and appearance, 3 Szgns No Sign of any kInd IS deSIgned or located so that any portIon of the Sign is more than SIX feet above tbe fuushed grade of the front lot hne of the parcel proposed for development unless the SIgn IS a part of a comprehensIve sign pro- gram; 4 Setbacks a. The reductIon In front setback con- tnbutes to a more active and dy- 5 namlC street hfe, b The reductIon ill front setback re- sults ill an Improved sIte plan or unproved deSIgn and appearance, c The reductIon ill SIde and rear set- back does not prevent access to the rear of any bUIldIng by emergency vehicles, d The reductIOn III SIde and rear set- back results 18 an Improved SIte plan, more effiCIent parkIng or Improved deSign and appearance, 5. The deSign of all butldmgs complies WIth the Tounst Dlstnct deSIgn gwdelIlles 18 DIVISIOn 5 of ArtIcle 3 G Offices 1 Hetght The illcreased heIght results 10 an 6 unproved Site plan or Improved deSign and appearance, Supp No 6 CD2 76 Stgns No Sign of any land IS deSIgned or located so that any portlOn of the Sign IS more than six feet above the finIshed grade of the front lot Ime of the parcel proposed for development unless such signage IS a part of an approved compre- henSIve SIgn program; Locatwn The use of the parcel proposed for development w1l1 not involve direct access to a major arterial street, Setbacks a. The reduction ill front setback con- tnbutes to a more actIve and dy~ namlc street hie, b. The reductaon in front setback re- sults 10 an improved SIte plan or rmproved design and appearance, c The reduction In SIde and rear set- back does not prevent access to the rear of any bUIlding by emergency vehIcles; d The reductIOn in sme and rear set- back results In an improved SIte plan, more effiCIent parking or Improved design and appearance, Off-street parkmg' a The phYSIcal charactenstics of a pro- posed bwldmg are such that the hkely uses of the property will re- qUITe fewer parkmg spaces per floor area than otherwise reqUITed or that the use of sigmficant portIons of the buildmg w1l1 be used for storage or other non-parkIng demand-generat- mg purposes, b Adequate parkmg is avaLlable on a shared baSIS as detenmned by all eXIstIng land uses WIthin 1,000 feet of the parcel proposed for develop- ment, or parkmg IS aVaIlable through eXIstmg or planned and committed parkmg faclhtIes or the shared park- mg formula 10 ArtIcle 3, DIVISIon 14 The deSIgn of all b11lldmgs complIes WIth the Tounst DIstnct deSIgn guIdelInes III DIVISIOn 5 of ArtIcle 3 ZONING DISTRICTS ~ 2-803 H Outdoor recreatwnlentertmnment. 1 The parcel proposed for development IS not contIguous to a parcel ofland whIch IS desIgnated as resIdentIal in the Zomng Atlas; 2 All sIgnage IS a part of a comprehensive SIgn program, 3. Sound amphficatIon is designed and con- structed to ensure that no ampWied. sound can be heard to the extent that the sound IS recogmzable Ul meamng of or IdentIty of a melody when wmd conditions are less than ten miles per hour at a dtstance of more than 100 feet In all directions or when WInd condItIons are ten mIles per hour or grater at a chstance of more than 150 feet Ul all dtrectIons; 4 All outdoor lightmg IS desIgned and con- structed so that no hght falls directly on land other than the parcel proposed for development; 5 Setbacks a The reduction in front setback con- tributes to a roore active and dy- namic street hfe, b The reductIon Ul front setback re- sults ill an rmproved sIte plan or Improved. desIgn and appearance; c. The reductIon In SIde and rear set- back does not prevent access to the rear of any buildmg by emergency vehIcles, d The reduct10n In SIde and rear set- back results In an Improved SIte plan, more effiCIent parkIng or unproved. deSIgn and appearance The deSIgn of all bUIldings comphes WIth the Tonnst DIStnct deSIgn gwdehnes m DIVlslon 5 of ArtIcle 3 6 7 Off-street parkwg Adequate park1ng IS aVaIlable on a shared baSIS as determmed by all eXlstmg land uses WItbJ.n 1,000 feet of the parcel proposed for development, or park1ng IS avaIlable through any eXlstmg Supp No 6 CD2 77 or planned and comnutted parkIng facili- tIes or the shared parkIng formula In ArtIcle 3, DIVISIon 14 I Ouermght accommodatwns 1 Locatwn The use of the parcel proposed for development will not mvolve direct access to an artenal street, 2 Hezght The mcreased heIght results in an Improved SIte plan and/or unproved de- SIgn and appearance, 3. Szgns. No SIgn of any kind is deSIgned or located so that any portIon of the SIgn IS more than SIX feet above the finished grade of the front lot hne of the parcel proposed for development unless such signage IS a part of an approved compre- henSIve SIgn program., 4 Setbacks: a The reduction in front setback con- trIbutes to a more actIve and dy- narmc street life, b The reduction in front setback re- sults in an improved site plan or Improved deSIgn and appearance, c The reduction In SIde and rear set- back does not prevent access to the rear of any buildIng by emergency vehtcles, d. The reduction In SIde and rear set- back results in an improved site plan, more effiClent parking or rmproved deSIgn and appearance, 5 The deSIgn of all bUlldtngs comphes WIth the Tonnst DIStnct design gwdelines in DIVISIOn 5 of Article 3_ 6 Lot area and wtdth_ The reduction In lot area andlor lot WIdth will not result In a bwldlOg wlnch IS out of scale wIth eXlst- Ing bwldmgs in the rmmernate viCInity of the parcel proposed for development J Restaurants 1 Lot area and wtdth The reductIOn In lot area Wlll not result III a bwldmg whlch IS ~ 2-803 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE out of scale wIth eXlstmg bUlldmgs In the Immewate VlcImty of the parcel proposed for development, 2 Locatwn The use of the parcel proposed for development will not mvolve dIrect access to a major artenal street, 3. Helght The Increased heIght results m an Improved SIt.:! plan and/or Improved de- SIgn and appearance, 4. Signs No Sign of any kmd IS deSigned or located so that any portIon of the Sign IS more than SIX feet above the firushed grade of the front lot hne of the parcel proposed for development unless the SIgn IS a part of a comprehenSIve SIgn pro- gram; 5. Setbacks a The reductIOn In front setback con- tnbutes to a more actIve and dy- nlUDJ.C street hfe; b. The reductIon m front setback re- sults In an Improved Site plan or unproved deSIgn and appearance; c The reductIon In sIde and rear set- back does not prevent access to the rear of any buIldIng by emergency velucles, d The reduction In Side and rear set- back results m an unproved site plan, more effiCIent parlung or Improved. deSign and appearance; 6. Off-street parkmg a The physical charactenshcs of a pro. posed bUlldIng are such that the lIkely uses of the property Will re- qUITe fewer parlung spaces per floor area than otherwIse reqUIred or that the use of sIgrnficant portIOns of the building for storage or other non- parkmg demand-generatmg purposes, b Fast food restaurants shall not be ehgtble for a reduchon m the num- ber of off-street parlong spaces, c Adequate parkmg IS available on a shared baSIS as determmed by all eXistIng land uses wlthm 1,000 feet Supp No 6 CD2 78 of the parcel proposed for develop- ment, or parkmg IS avaliable through any eXlstmg or planned and comnut- ted parlong facIhtIes or the shared parkmg formulas m Arhcle 3, DIvi- sIOn 14 7 The deSign of all buIldmgs comphes With the Thunst Ihstnct deSIgn gUIdelInes m DIVISion 5 of Article 3 K Retatl sales and servlCes. 1. Lot area and wldth The rerluchon m lot area will not result m a buIldIng whtch IS out of scale WIth exIstIng buildings m the unmediate VlClmty of the parcel proposed for development; Locatwn The use of the parcel proposed for development WIll not Involve drrect access to a major arterial street, 2 3 Herght The Increased height results In an rmproved. SIte plan or Improved design and appearance; 4 Setbacks 5 a The reductIOn In front setback con- tnbutes to a more actIVe and dy. namlC street bfe, b. The reduction In front setback re- sults in an Improved site plan or rmproved deSIgn and appearance, c The reductIon In Side and rear and setbacks does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emer- gency velncles, d The reductIOn 10 Side and rear set- backs results In an Improved SIte plan, more effiCIent parking or un- proved deSIgn and appearance, Off-street park mg' a The phYSICal charactenstIcs of a pro- posed bUlldmg are such that the likely uses of the property Will re- qUire fewer parkmg spaces per floor area than otherwIse reqUIred or that the use of SIgnificant portIOns of the ZONING DISTRICTS ~ 2-902 butldmg will be used for storage or other non-parkmg demand-generat- mg purposes Adjacent land uses are of a nature that there IS a lugh probabIlity that patrons will use modes of transpor- tatIon other than the automobtle to access the use, c Adequate parkmg IS avatlable on a shared baslS as determmed by all eXlstIng land uses within 1,000 feet of the parcel proposed for develop- ment, or parkIng is avatlable through any exIStIng or planned and commit- ted parkmg facthtles or the shared parkIng formula in Artlcle 3, DIVl- sion 14. b , -~~ ~~ ... 6. The desIgn of all bwldinga complies wIth the 'lbunst Thstnct desIgn gwdelmes in D1visIon 5 of Article 3 (Ord No 6526-00. ~ 1,6-15-00; Ord No 6928-02, ~ 21, 5-2-02) DIVISION 9 DOWNTOWN DISTRICT ("D") Section 2.901. Intent and purpose. The intent and purpose of the Downtown Ths- tnct is to estabhsh a mixed use downtown where crb.zens can work, live, and shop ill a place which IS the economic, governmental, entertamment and cultural focal pomt of a hveable CIty. Section 2-901.1. Maximum development po- tential. It IS the mtent of the Downtown DIStriCt (liD") that development be consIstent WIth the CountYWIde Future Land Use Plan as required by state law The development potentIal of a parcel of land Wltbm the 0 District shall be deternnned by the standards found in tlus Development Code as well as the CountywIde Future Land Use DesIg~ natIon of the property For those parcels Wlthm the D Distnct that have a Future Land Use of Central Busmess DIstnCt ("CED"), maximum de- velopment potential shall be as set forth for each classIficatIOn of use and locatIOn In the approved redevelopment plan Supp No 6 Section 2-902. Flexible standard develop- ment. Tbe followmg uses are Level One per:mJ.tted uses In the Downtown DistrIct subject to the standards and cntena set out In tillS sectIon and other apphcable proVlsIOns of ArtIcle 3 Table 2-902 "DO Flenble Standard Development Standards Max. Height Mln. Off-Street Use (ft) Parkmg Accessury Dwelhngs PIa nia Alcohohc Beverage 30------50 ~ per 1,000 GFA Sales Attached Dwelhngs 30----50 1-1 5 per UnIt Convenbon Center 30-50 5 per 1,000 GFA Indoor RecreabonlEn- 30------50 ~ per 1,000 GFA tertamment Facility NIghtclubs 30------50 3-10 per 1,000 GFA Offices 30------50 1-3 per 1,000 GFA OvermghtAccommoda- 30------50 75-1 per UnIt bona Parkmg Garages and 50 nla Lots Parks and Recreabon 50 1 per 20,000 SF or as FaCIhbes deternuned by the com- mUnIty development coordtnator based on ITE Manual standards Places of Woralnp 30----50 5~1 per 2 seats Pubhc Transportatton 10 nla FaClhbes Restaurants 30------50 5-15 per 1,000 GFA Retatl Sales and &r- 30------50 2---4 per 1,000 GFA VIce Sidewalk Vendors nla nla SOClal and CommUnIty 30-50 2-4 per 1,000 GFA Centers UblltylInfrastructure PIa nla FaClhttes Flexibility standards: A Accessory dwellmgs One accessory dwell. mg, wluch IS subordmate and accessory to a pnncIpal permitted use proVlded that 1 Ttt1e to the accessory dwelling IS vested m the ownership of the pnncipal use; 2 The floor area of the accessory dwelling does not exceed 25 percent of the floor area of the pnncipal use CD2 79 I ~ ARGEIfflNA JUNCAL <\. ro ~" I' H 1905 PlLGFIAMs WA Y AiW 1VUl, L .. ... OAJcv1LLE ()fy C1II>hlQA 402 I I ~ (905) B27-ii693 _ \ L6M--2X2 : I I ~ ARGENTINA JUNCAL s.hQSE""" , , I C ; I liE 855BAYWAYBLVDAPT701J'VV.!0( N~'''' I ~ CLEARWATER FL 33767 ~ I = (727)442-9318 ~~ ,L_ I Cv ~~ -,-- - i€ <) l%~~ ~~~ J '( ." 'O\~.'f"1 ..... ~'\ ~ ';,.. .. ~ :..". .....~~ '" ~ ~ \;'~ .1> \.';J..\\.;i . ~\'- ,. .,.....'r....d""~-r ~..e~ flvz. ~\~~ -' '---2 ' {/c:-. ~ / ~ -~ ------ ""';"~ - - :.:~- , .~ ;e- r.a.1t//~ ~~tUM~ /6 ~y . cYl ;f /~ jw-J~ P r&'c- ~~ ~ ~ ~~ /U-;aA~ ~~ 7?~ ~~/ L.1V-'- w~ el'~ z: ~~ rY&-L( ~~ we ~~rR7 ~ Z; ~ )+~ rF' ~ eP!:.-o .87~~ I ~~/ uJ~ fa 0-t~ 'V4-'W~~ ~~ ~d~ Ae;.. ~ct ~~/ ~ ~4 ~ ?-U-cl z; ~ct.u ~ rH ~ ~ 7~ ('hAn1~/ ~~ ~ ~CI' ~~ (l<<-~~ Q1.r t7k4 ~~ uJ~ #~ ~ ~ r;/~ t!Yl- r~e. ~~~ a.-c.-rC('" 4- ~ ~ ~~../ ~~ y~ t; rcep ~~~e ~ ,P'~.d-I x~ ~. ~'~~ ;z:- ~ l' :IIC /U.-~,~<~~ ~ ~ ~A. (8&~w.J::. ~,) ar...,~ .ei:.;:.t~ z:: dl-<-1 ~tH--~ ~~. \- ~ {~ /P2-f ~ a~~/ WL G1Ae ~7 Reynolds, Mike From: Sent: To Subject: ross m fosberg [rosstheboss5@luno com] Tuesday, September 21 , 2004 12 55 PM Reynolds, Mike [BULK] DREADED ALMINAR PROJECT RECEIVED Importance. Low SEP 22 2004 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF ClEARWATER Dear Mr Reynolds' I recently rece~ved not~f~cat~on of the horrendous ~dea of add~ng 14ft to the bUlld~ng across from me and br~ng~ng ~t way to close to the street. Why? Clearwater po~nt ~s known for ~ts 3 story bu~ld~ngs surround~ng us and all are on the water Why let someone now change th~s rules and degrade our property? Seems the new construct~on doesn't even have a pool Are we to s~t by and let these new people use the 3 pools we support here? Suppose we w~ll need to hlre more guards to f~ght th~s s~tuat~on off The recent bu~ld~ng up the street on Bayway seems to f~t ~n Not to tall, Just r~ght Th~s nAlm~nar Pro]ectD seems to have nonly" the developer ~n m~nd_ How about us tax pay~ng resldents at 851 Bayway Blvd? Thank You Ross Fosberg Um t #403 1 Mr Michael Reynolds CIty of Clearwater 100 SD Myrtle Ave POBox 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 RECEIVED September 17,2004 SF.P 2 2 200~ PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF ClEARWATER Subject Almmar Project at 850 S Bayway Blvd, Clearwater Beach FLD2004-04026 We own property at 855 S Bayway Blvd m the Clearwater POint complex on Clearwater Beach It IS our understandmg that the property at 850 S Bayway Blvd, which IS across the street from our property, IS bemg considered for vanances that allow It to, 1 grow from 35 feet to 45 feet m heIght, and 2 reduce the setback from the property line to 6 feet from the reqUired 15 feet We strongly oppose thiS request There IS no acceptable reason to grant any code vanances for thiS property The codes were establIshed to set a "standard" for the area and we belIeve that all owners should respect that <'standard" SpecIfically, a 6 foot setback IS more SUitable for an alley or a downtown area, not a respected resort area such as Clearwater Beach With on-street parkmg m front of the bUIldmg, a 6 foot setback would severely restrict emergency vehicle and personnel access It would create both a dangerous SItuatIOn and an undeSirable visual effect on the area's aesthetics The height extensIOn form 35 feet to 49 feet would also create an undeSIrable dIfference between that bUlldmg and the nearby waterfront bUIldmgs Agam, there IS no reason to grant an exceptIon to the <<standards" for the area As prevlOusly stated, we oppose grantmg of these specific varIances and generally oppose any vaTlances from the established codes and standards Despite the fact that we currently reside outside ofFlonda, we have purchased on Clearwater Beach and mtend to relocate there when we retire III the not-to-dlstant future We pay property taxes (m fact, higher than the reSidents) and deserve the nght to be heard on thiS Issue It would be a cnme for us to retIre to FlOrIda only to find the character of Clearwater Beach had changed undeSirably from when we purchased Due to work cormmtments, we are not able to attend the heaTIng on thiS matter, but we trust that our vOices Will be heard through thiS correspondence Donna and Fred Betz --L . / /:?~ 5384 PIOneer Dr ~~~ /-.J, CmcmnalI, OH 45247 D~ ~ Owners of Unit 908, 855 S Bayway Blvd, Clearwater Beach, FL 33767 . ,I \RI~(c\Eu~\E\O ,c J,"-_ f - 1/ SEP 2 1 20.0~1~ ~'~ (r It ~~ 6\1'<:1~.r,I\'11'5! l:"'\r.::ryfl,rn,;rI.\f,/~I:\~'1l'" ~ _ ..Jf\.. \,b'\,.L\' \dJ L .-./j, '\\J~ ~ n:Ju.-=ti'\J U II r;"'\\f OF ClG~\IVA1\ER ";' '}, ,r,,,I,- \ I 1\'" ~ J1 ~ II ~ ',: ..) , . , ) ,. '. . r Frank Gerlock Development Review Manager City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S Myrtle Ave Clearwater, FL 33757 Dear Sir RECEIVED SEP 21 ZOO~ PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER We recently received a notice of a bUilding permit request for construction at 850 Bayway Blvd In Clearwater Beach My wife and lawn a retirement condominium In the Shipmaster BUilding at 800 South Gulf View Blvd , across the street to the southwest from the permit site There IS no questIOn that Intense redevelopment of Clearwater Beach 1510 full sWing PermIts are belOg issued for massive projects that are changing the face and character of the beach area People buy retirement properties so that atter a life of hard work, they can spend some or most of their time In Flonda enJoYing the great attnbutes the state has to offer It IS our opinion that we should expect reasonable effort from the City of Clearwater to protect the value of our properties and the character of the lifestyle This permit violates both of the stated cntena The 'Point' IS reasonably complete from a development standpoint There IS an effective staglOg of the heights of bUildings from the center to the water, with views that have been established for dozens of years The feeling of open space also benefits from the setback between the sidewalk and the bUilding fronts, and from some space between the bUlldmgs Consistency In the bUlldmg heights along the water and the hlgh-nses In the center creates a planned and polished look for the Pomt The value of our properties depends on protecting these attnbutes Increasing the value of the permit property at the expense of hundreds of condo owners nearby IS not fair No redevelopment 10 the POint area should be allowed to front up to the sidewalk Also, views should be mamtalned, essentially as they currently are with no significant Increase In bUilding heights This permit should be emphatically denied R~~I~c(JA~ ~ Richard A and Sandra L Kitto 53397 Place SE Bellevue, WA 98004 rakltto@aol com 425-454-4555 ORIGINAL MIchael Reynolds C/City of Clearwater Box 4748 100 S. Myrtle Ave. Clearwater, Fl33758A748 September 14, 2004 Mr Reynolds My name IS Jean Meo and I live at 851 Bayway Blvd Apt. 606. I strongly object to the proposed project at 850 Bayway Blvd, because this directly has a negative impact on the value of my property. Based on the plans, It appears that these umts will be rental units With people coming and gomg constantly Who IS gomg to buy my umt WIth the noise coming from across the street? ThIs happens now to a lesser extent With no one on the property for supervision Place a larger structure on this piece of land and the problem becomes greater. There are no motels on this end of Bayway Blvd. ThIs is a residential section and has been peaceful for many years. ThIs bnngs me to another point. I believe your department has not been looking out for the reSIdents of Clearwater Point which has a large tax base and voting block. I feel your department has bent over backwards for the developer III approvrng TWO variances so the developer can buIld the building he wants and not what IS In the best mterest of the residents of Clearwater POInt and Clearwater Beach. At present there are no bmldrngs on Bayway that are over four stories. This developer got from your department a variance to go fourteen feet plus over roof code He also got a variance to have lus property six feet from the pavement. There has been a lot ofbmldmg gomg on in Clearwater Beach With condo units costing $750,000+. None of these bUildings are over four stories. Why should the city allow this developer to be the exception? ~~ Jean Moo 851 Bayway Blvd. Apt. 606 Clearwater Beach, Fl33767 ORiGINAL ~"'".. tJ t Ji\; ( .... ~ t ~ f ~ I MIchael Reynolds CICIty of Clearwater 100 S Myrtle Ave Box 4748 Cleanvater FL 33758-4748 Dear Mr Reynolds My name IS Stafford Mousky and I own a condo at 800 S Gulfvlew Blvd on the th floor overlookmg the Clearwater Yacht Club I want to vOIce my objectIOn to the proposed project at 850 Bayway Blvd because It WIll have a negatIve llnpact on all of the resIdences of Cleanvater POInt and of the South end of Cleanvater Beach In a word, It would be too hIgh and would hkely be largely a rental umt with high turn over on a structure too large for the space, especially when parkmg etc are nghtly added to the equation As you are well aware a number of 3-4 story town houses have recently been bUIlt on the water on the southern part of Clearwater Beach (As you are also aware, these townhouses also have parkIng faclhtles and sWImrrung pools on their premises) Nothmg on the water over 3-4 stones has been bUilt on the southern part of Clearwater m a long, long time what IS bemg proposed IS not In the best mterest of the many residents ofCleanvater Pomt, nor, by extensIon, to the other full tIme residents of Cleanvater Beach I remam hopeful that your department WIll turn down the proposal of the developer, or at a nummrun consIderably reduce the heIght and Increase the vanance from the pavement of the bUlldmg from the figures that are currently bemg proposed - , l.. 1\ I If this developer IS allowed to ~ucceed III hIS plans as currently proposed, you are obviously and unnecessanly opemng up another Pandora's Box As SpIke Lee says, "Do the nght thmg " S~!:'j/V'~ Staff.;;?&:i~~ky / i OR \ 8'\ NAL 1 .i I \ I ~ .....~ ! 'I j l} ~ "''''~d ~";.ilj1i 1 I (" )1,h}j.I~"".:I~ ~ tYJU ) f t~ ......1'_1 '"$-' I I \~1 l' "'Jl IH.~ ~ ~'-:"j.1 - HIll',..... /1 P l~~'":' -."fJ 7ftrr L! ~~'J f..J~ f j j~~ ~ II f"' 4 I :t. ~ t, ! }. t r "j ~ , i ) " , 't-(' /', ., , . , . , -', 1 ~EC[E~V[E[J) SEP 2 1 2004 rl#;.t~~( ~ ~ \8 rD:EPA~l~~~~1r C "",-Y OF CLEARWATER ~ I ~ l ,~' ~.-, I' I.. .i l J iij .d -4. .J r ~ [J ~t""rV.;./ ' J l_ 'I r"f"~"::(\~ ~ j Michael Reynolds C/CIty of Cleanvater 100 S Myrtle Avenue Box 4748 Clearwater, Fl 33758-4748 Mr Reynolds My name IS Stacy Angehs and T lIve at 830 Gulfvlew Blvb wIth my husband LOUIe We strongly object to the proposed project at 850 Bayway Blvd, as presented to your board Based on the plans It appears that this will be a mIxed used proJect of rental and hotel umts We beheve your department IS not lookmg to protect the aesthetIcs of Clearwater Pomt and the Beach commullIty At present there are no bUIldmgs on Bayway Blvd whIch front on the canal that are ovcr four stones This developer IS requestmg from your department a vanances that are not 10 the be,>t mterest of Clearwater Pomt and Beach CommunIty He IS requestmg a varIance to have hi:' setback reqUIrements reduced by 9 feet to the pavement, and requestmg a vanance for a bU1ldmg height mcrease by 14 feet plus appurtenances l'hlS will set a precedence for future development that Will destroy the mtegnty and beauty of the area The CIty, I believe has set a reasonable standard and all developments should abIde to With no exceptIOns, otherwIse why set standards In wntmg tlus letter I am contestmg thiS actIOn ~~ Stacy Angehs 830 South Gulf view Blvd Clearwater,'FI3376':'J .... 1; rr > ] '- 1 r OJ q , l.,F ~ f)q, OR\G\NJ'\l _,I l .' ~[C[.uV[E[J) SEI1 g 1 20D4 r~J~~~~C~G [fJE\?v~~l~~[s~T rr<"~ '1 Of Cl\EA\RW~TER " September 17,2004 Mr Michael Reynolds SenIor Planner City of Clearwater 100 S Myrtle Ave POBox 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 Re Objections to the Proposed "Almlnar" Project, 850 S Bayway Blvd Dear Mr Reynolds My name IS Patrick A Dalessandro and my wife, Amy, and I are the owners of Unit C-404 at 855 S Bayway Blvd We greatly object to the proposed "Almlnar" project at 850 S Bayway Blvd We believe that this proJect, as currently proposed, would be a detriment to the Clearwater POint community by fundamentally changing the character of this neighborhood Zoning ordinances are put In place to ensure the safety of the public and to preserve the character and integrity of a community Granting the developer a variance to reduce the requIred setback from 15' to 603' IS a potential risk to publiC safety as IS the potential for Increased traffic and the problems that come With a more transient population In a resIdential community Allowing the developer to add 14' feet to the height of the eXisting structure would make thIs project the only water's edge bUilding on Clearwater POint to exceed 35 feet Granting variances such as these sets a dangerous precedent for future development It opens the door to Similar vanatlons from the code that will certainly detract from the character of the Clearwater POint community, and they Will certainly be Cited as examples by future developers seeking bUilding variances Although the City maintains that the "loss of view" IS not a valid reason for objecting to the proposal, we disagree My Wife and I are licensed Real Estate Brokers and I have over 32 years expenence In selling resIdential and commercial properties The view or "loss of view" does have an economic Impact on property values Other things being equal, properties With a view of the water or good SIte-lines on a golf course tYPically command a higher value than those With a view of a wall or a rooftop laden With ventilation Units As a bUSinessman, I appreciate the City'S deSire for new development and the opportunity to enhance ItS tax base As a property owner, I choose to maintain a condominium on the fourth floor of the Commodore bUilding because I enJoy the character of thIs community as It currently eXists New development In an established community reqUires careful balance and conSideratIon This proposal 'overly favors the developer to the detriment of many reSidents In the surrounding properties and we therefore request that this project be denied as It IS currently proposed We are sure that If the developer IS a quality bUilder OR\G\NAL Mr Michael Reynolds September 17, 2004 Page Two with integrity, he or she will be Interested In developing aesthetically pleasing properties that both enhance the neighborhood they are located In and produce a substantial profitable return on the Investment We are sure that a compromIse can be reached regarding the setback and height variance requests Thank you for your consIderation Sincerely, ~ yt.tlFiPfJuAAltrN ~~;'IUJ Patrick -A D'lessandro A M Dalessandro 610 N Maple Prospect Heights, IL 60070 and 855 S Bayway Blvd, Unit C404 Clearwater Beach, FL 33767 OR\G\NAL ~3l.'VMMV3l10 ~O A l~J !\M~~~lij\fd3(Q1 6~u ~\N\'\(ij~ ~OOl '[ Z d3S (Q1~^~31~~~ -......~ - , 506-510 E MARKET 5T WARREN, OHIO 44481 392-5176 OR 395.7808 FAX 392-6768 132 NilES-CORTLAND RD WARREN, OHIO 44484 609-7473 OR 609-7474 FAX 609-6462 (Yl1l~ ~n<){&r r'l{ V'\""""'-<- l S ~ ~ +-14<0 4;-/5' ~ T / {VL /r}- <?.s-s S ~ tv '" '1 ~ I \J 0 ~ L:> ""'"' (>-JoA- <\11 cJ J' -IV>., 1> '2- - J.- ('; b j '" U- tv ((("1) -C\,d.- h).-l"l- 1((1) <i'''~ 11 J ~ :; () G~ u.r~ 1)1u() . f 1'\ J<,J<q- p~_(eWO--<- ~ 1.e1f'lf for p. h~p"'--J- or ~/ !'Vb J- \ Y' (',1}+ V' _____ <"I ~ I 5 A r~ 15 fAAC.-L ~ 1 ~ 1)--- , .f w ~ r Q.,A .J <I'-\. l}- , r c1~~..w- ~ r;(~-.fy:rc/<J",j-- r ('---...... rr->--- w J- J-L. y1.. to> r"t.-V ,... "'.J ')- If cr-" l ' \ Co"" 0'--') 1\ -'""- J-- --t->> ___ \ <f-<> h. Q, ( ()-- c-i- j-h 'j 1, \J dJA/ ~ I ~Js ~ 0 · j ",<I----- ". ~ J-k J ~ A Is" {) Lj ",tJr. "..fp .f.Jt Il '-'-'( .- ?/~.a c~+.,..cJ- lc:::::' ~...-.. W A , 0..... j' f5; cr (. 0..,.., W1l- '7 f>1 u/1'? ~ (If'jJ G I Ur p....--Kt ..- %) lZ . 3 ~ ,Cl OR\G\~t\\.. ~ ~ u _ ~ I '1- ~ 1... >.Y' {~,_ LJ44_/3~L q I-- \ RECE~VED SEP 2 1 ZOO~ PLANNiNG DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER '~ \ ,.. l I ~, Michael Reynolds C/Clty of Clearwater 100 S Myrtle Ave : Box 4748 ' Clearwater, FL 33758 Sl?~;;:- /~, o3fJO~ / ", Dear Mr Reynolds, My name IS Walter Poznanski, and I own the apartment # 806 located at 855 Bayway Blvd I have recently been mformed that there IS a proposed project to develop a property at 850 Bayway Blvd I strongly object to this project, as It would severely Impact the value of my property From the looks of the plans, It appears that this would be a very large rental property, with the Units constantly changmg hands I purchased a residential Unit, In a residential area, for the sole purpose of It'S peace and solitude Constructing a large motel In our area would create a nOise problem, would limit emergency access, and would compromise secunty, which In turn would directly diminish the value of my property In addition, I must protest thiS construction based on the violations of the zOning board's rules and regulations From what I understand, thiS proposed construction project would violate the current rules by permitting the developer to erect hiS project at a height of 14 feet plus a roof over the current regulations Regulabons are enacted for a purpose, and If the zOning board will be arbltranly varying from the rules that they themselves created, then there does not appear to be any reason for these rules whatsoever Why will thiS developer be arbltranly permitted to erect thiS property In variance to the codes? How will thiS benefit anyone but himself? I also understand that thiS developer has requested a variance not only on the height restnctlon, but also on the proximity of the property to the pavement Our neighborhood, as I mentioned before, has always been residential, and plaCing large structures SIX feet from the pavement would significantly reduce ItS suburban charm, and thus, Significantly reduce the value of my property I do not understand why anyone would be permitted to simply Ignore the rules and regulations that have been for many years a main part of the enjoyment we have In our property For all of these reasons, I reiterate, as a property owner, and loyal taxpayer, who would be strongly and negatively Impacted by thiS proJect, I object to the granting of thiS development Sincerely Yours, / /. J / / ~/V1 /JA?' Walter poznansW~/~U/'l'''''' ORIG\NAL b\31VM}jV31~ :JIO Alu;J !~31~lMVd3(] E)~~~~V1d ~OOl '[ ~ d~S a3J^~3103~ ~ . . tvlichael Reynolds C/City of Clearwater 100 S Myrtle Ave Box 4748 Clearwater, F1337S8-4748 Mr. Reynolds WE- strongly obJect to the proposed project at 850 Bayway Blvd., because this directly has a negative nnpact on the value ofmy property. Based on the plans It appears that these units will be rental units with people commg and going constantly Who is gomg to buy my urut with the nOlsc commg from across the street. This happens now to a lesser extent with no one on the property for supervision. Place a larger structure on this pIece of land and the problem becomes greater There are no motels on this end ofBayway Blvd. This is a residential section and has been peaceful for many years i 11us bnngs me to another point. I beheve your department has not been looking out tor the reSIdents of Clearwater Point which has a large tax base and voting block. I feel your department has bent over backwards for the developer m approving TWO variances so the developer can bwld the bwlding he wants and not what IS in the best interest of the residents of Clearwater Point and Clearwater Beach. At present there are no buildings on Bayway that are over four stories. This developer got from your department a vanance to go fourteen feet plus a roof over corle. He also got a variance to have his property six feet from the pavement. There has been a lot ofbmlding going on m Clearwater Beach with condo units costing $750,000+. None' of these buildings are over four stories Why should the city allow this developer to be the exception? /: - .------ J Cd e6 a.. 1Zvn'lD.- CLd5~<L ORIGINAL ...' ..:t.II '......... ~~ RrECClE~V[ErD SEP 2 1 200~ PlA~~~~G lIJEPAR1MElMl C~yy OF CLEARWATER ,I (J) I ~ ,I I . '" ,ju~'-U'-,U_'1i ,-..-. . -~'- ~ .. - q Ib!D y, . . n'" ": ~_~~o.~\__ ~ w>;>~ _..Un. --1\1\:.0 '... ..' -- . . . .. _ +...{ rry .Q.f;. \~"!"'-!~ ~~C~-. . ...-.- . .. ~.~~_<s ._~~.U~ ~ -. 'j~~ ~J.~:~1tA~' - - _.--. . -,-~ - -- ~ --Jr- - -~ -- --~" ~ ~~ ,,'t - 0 ~ ~- -~ ~--' r - _- - - ~~Gn~~\NF\\€ --~ -- - "'- ---" -- . ,.n. n'11CJ~-(~1 ~L_.3.3'?~~~__.. 'U" d"_ . -- - -~--- ~- J- ='~ ~ _=_. ~- _ -. ~,__ _ _~. - ~__ ~--~-_ ~- __ - --- ~_T- ~- - ~ .~ .. .. ... _ +>>.V. R~lI''?\'''\.., '/ __ _'._.. __'_ ... .. _ . . on .. - -- .~=- ~ U <It J ti - -- .~-~ --- - ~ - ~- - - - - - ~ ~ - ~ - -, -- - - - -- -- ..' ---. . :~3D~r -L\~,IM.~ }s. ~~t-..~~.l\...(\:'~'SO~ '0-' u_ ..... ..J.. . ---. .c..vJ" J e.u,J. f?>/...d -r ~ .....'l.0.1 · .I. fy.. t7 . .... . .. . ,iob'~~.. 1-i>. +k. \YOl-::>~ . 'fr~~d~J. 8' S'C:> .'. - - . .___h. . ,( .\b='-VW""ln- ~(v'd__ ~h~~~ Ahi> ,~\YJLJll . H' 'n.' _..n.' ~bo_~ ~ __ "'l~-kVe... n_ ,.....('-o..c.P:...!)~ +k..Vo./L(.JL.. , '. n. .. iC~-M~I'-" ~~~i~.J-..I::\I B~L' <>-"'. ~ rlQ.MtS ,~ ._ . -.>4 ~ ~ '" \.\\ -- W_t_- L~_.Y~ fol_ u IA. l.j.., _ GA.J i.J.4 . 1\e.ptk _ _Co.""'>t- ~ ~~ () - Co.,.s~f/y ~ . "'1 .-WkO ,! ~ .. ~ \ .. ~ ,-t~. b '-I, VJA '( vL"'" f W I -Ii., 4 ~ - . y\ ..:LR... . " ~ """:, \'L~ ~."""" -. a..C 1'0s 5 +.k. ~ ~ _ __~ i~gW-ea--\ '_- ~12_ "'-.~ ~ ~_ V:~SrJ~f~J s ~ cAr","" . ... i ?I:^ L. h 0..,) ..b.u..,... "'.t"\'o-.(d~...i ,~v f'I\'if(-1 ~ . _~_ __.~ _ _ j' X I ~'v, () ...9-- 1 0,. Yif.V .~ ~A (.....cJ.~y<--~.o1>.... . -I-h, ~ . .'.... . i \ b~ .... ..Q-\' . _\~.....dn _O-NI.d . t L,~ ' YYQbJ e- ~ . .._~. ---l__1:C9b~ik~~~~~' J~~y~~. 'h-2.s. - -.-' .. ~Vl 0-\-" i b.~.. - ~I ; ~\Y "1 C--- _(0 '^-- .\- '. ~ -+p:;-- ( . - ~ __ P htrf:L5 \_~.Q..M. 'h_ _ "' - <~ - - ~uJ3-+t::..-r r '" T - - - . .ivJ ~\ J., ho...~ . ~..c.Q..1{- +"\.-1<-. bQ..~ .u.. J ' . .. .~, .... :tQ~~~..'.~~;~ij~..:t~ .~I )O~V d~~~~~i _ L >~L_~__~ __~_ __ h~ t_ _\l~~>.b ~LIAJ~~, ~ -~ ---~.... ~,~ ~,,~\ "T ~y- \ V\ 9-ff\':cW"'''' C)' : . L~u,) 0 . V~~.01J1o,. . - .. ,.,'5-.c..,.\.hL..d..c..JJ1-~ ,~..bu.d+-lh Q.. . . .. O' .- nO' bV~\ \ ~'.\~6' he.. ..W~ b. -- e.u..! Vl ~t .. lJ h. ~ -l- IS _._ ~ _ _ -~ _11 \ VL - -thL ..b,Wf - ,~k~+. 8 ~_ ~'lL V~J}d et.tfs __ ~ _ _~P-\ C\~Yu.l~-p~~~+-__~~_~C(~{~&:-~ 8~cit_, I - Ci) ! '---~-~~--rf ejp. :I: ~L-av~__'\L\'0~. . _ _ 3L'-A...._\4~_.~----B-~_v.U~ dha.+ cu:.L.__ fy)_e..2L ~-~v-S'_.fg ~~_~ ~h's d~tle,J~e~~_" I ~ r_ J I ~ 3._o/D/AA l..QJ~..\L...q_~QLhUleM!= ~ . --[oj, Q..l<I-~ .J-;) ~ 1'1. ~ rJlA.s Q... y';)o& Ov'-'-<--;:-Cn4e ~ ~kv~~l~.l: u..b;:) ~...t>-VI UAAc.L :b~ b..o.)li.e--j(1_I_S-.eY:~r~-9'- S\ll\-~ to ..... :f "-'- f 9.. v' e-uA eM f. ; V\ .. I .;C Q d.aLe.Lof-~ L '- r i~ ~ct..Ao eda > 1- Q~-C4...-~u_2>J ~~~_c.1 V1L\ e....QJA-~S 1- ~'~<{.wLL~ QU~JA:\: k~J~ ti_~~t_ __ _6 ~ ~J.~.J v ~_~l e.- . _ _ ____ -rku"e..- hQ...) b~ 0.. 10+-.91 blJ~ IJ~?5- ----- -\f~'^?s/~ ~'^ CJ~..{..,.,,-O-~_~ vJ~-I-h -- _._ t;1~:~.. ~ 0 & ~jt~C>>5t~~J~:;_o:: "'av~ =- ~~..::~-:= . :~~~ ~J~v. i"~1LL1~ <: ~ br_.~Ll{) ~7 ~=- ____ _,s -.AMd.oF~-- \) b~-tLu.. e. ,><..L~-IIi)"" . ~=:~- ~:.~=:- .. '-~~o :-k.1~..~~"." .... . .. :..~~ ~ ~~______~ __~ V1.~j~~__~~'j)~..~__ __._ __..__ og 3c>__..~....\Y."l'YLJ~.~".L~~~1 . .___ _~ ___ <_~j4?';w~___~/_E[_33~1-6_?- ~ _<__~ . ._-~- ~----~- - I--~>--~------~~~~~-' - ..- - -~-~_?-~~----~ ___.........---__c-.._.... ~~ -- - - -- -.-- - I - --- -- -- ----~-~- -- -I ~~~----- - -- ----~---- ~- -- -~- -..---~ ---.,...~--- .. ,......., . _--.4 _______ _~___. _________ ~_?_---~ ~~._-~ ---~- . . Page 1 of 1 S}lbJ Re 850 Bayway I Chart House location Date 9/16/200495228 PM Eastern Daylight Time From HugJeanne ITa Mike re}lnolds@m}lclearwater com MIchael Reynolds CIClty of Clearwater 100 S Myrtle Ave Clearwater, Fl 33758-4748 Mr Reynolds My name IS Gertrude Hartnett and I live at 851 S Bayway Blvd Apt 704 I strongly object to the proposed project at 850 Bayway Blvd, because thIs directly has a negative Impact on the value of my property Based on the plans It appears that these units WIll be rental units with people coming and gOing constantly Who IS gomg to buy my unit with the nOIse commg from across the street This happens now to a lesser extent with no one on the property for supervision Place a larger structure on this piece of land and the problem becomes greater There are no motels on this end of Bayway Blvd This IS a residential section and has been peaceful for many years This bnngs me to another pOint I believe your department has not been lookmg out for the residents of Clearwater POint which has a large tax base and voting block I feel your department has bent over backwards for the developer In approving TWO vanances so the developer can bUild the bUilding he wants and not what IS In the best Interest of the residents of Clearwater POint and Clearwater Beach At present there are no bUildings on Bayway that are over four stones The developer got from your department a vanance to go fourteen feet plus a roof over code He also got a vanance to have hiS property SIX feet from the pavement There has been a lot of bUilding gOlOg on In Clearwater Beach WIth condo umts costing $750,000+ None of these bUildings are over four stones Why should the City allow thiS developer be the exception? ~N~~ Gertrude Hartnett 851 S Bayway Blvd, Apt 704 Clearwater Beach, FI 33767 , f ...l ... > \. 't \.- ~ J '^ ' - ,RECEiVED ... I.... I ~ \ l ~ "..' \, ... ,,) ~, , I ~ f"1 J } \" J I' I l~ ;i } SI:? 2 2'. 200~~ PLANNING DEPARTMENT rw'l'V t""Ir,f"" ~A'o\l\'4.Tl=R I I"... - ~ I .no: ',- . ~ , ~... ....1 '... L I~ '" . " Thursday, September 16,2004 Amenca Online HugJeanne n Lincoln Alfred A Mashnouk Member of PreSident S Ctlbmel Ll'lcoln FI 'la 'lCI a I A... ~r5 Corp Supervising Office 860 Route 10 W 1300 S Clinton St Ra'ldolph, NJ 07869 1906 Fort Wayne, IN 46802-3506 pho'le973598 1413 pho'le80045~626S fax 973 598 1955 reSidence 973 366 7494 FinanCIal AdvJsorsl/ll A membef' of LU'rt.olt1 Fmancl.d Group RECEIVED SEP ~ 2 2004 PLANNING DEPARTMENT crrv OF ClEARWATER Mr Michael Reynolds C/Clty of Clearwater 100 S Myrtle Ave Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758A748 September 20,2004 Mr Reynolds, My name IS Alfred Mashnouk and I own 830 South Gulfvlew Blvd, Apt 607 I strongly object to the proposed project at 850 Bayway Blvd, because thiS directly has a negative Impact on the value of my property Based on the plans, It appears that these umts will be rental umts with people commg and gomg constantly Who IS gomg to buy my umt with the nOise commg from across the street? ThIS happens now to a lesser extent with no one ~ , I ~ ~ I l ... ...! ~ on the property for supervision Place a larger structure on thIS piece ofland and the problem becomes greater There are no motels on thiS' en"d Hi B~0Vay BI~d l~ThllS'IS a reSidentIal section and has been peaceful for many yea~s ' ,'- j.,;.J ,'f! ,: ThIS bnngs me to another pomt I believe your department has not been lookmg out for the reSIdents of Clearwater POint which has a large tax base and votmg block I feel your department has bent over backwards for the developer m approvmg TWO vanances so the developer can build the bUlldmg he wants and not what IS m the best mterest of the reSidents of Clearwater Pomt and Clearwater Beach At present there are no bUlldmgs on Bayway that are over four stones ThIS developer got a vanance from your department, to go fourteen feet plus a roof over code He also got a vanance to have hIS property SIX feet from the pavement There has been a lot ofbUlldmg gomg on m Clearwater Beach with condo umts costmg $750,000+ None of these bUlldmgs are over four stones Why should the city allow thIS developer to be the exceptIon? 1lj J i 1 , Smcerely, ~~~~ f~ 'r"lf Clearwater Beach, FL) 33767 ' , , " '~ wwv, lFAonhne com Securities and Investme'lt advl50ry servICe5 offered through LI ncoln FinanCial AdVISors Corp, a broker-dealer and regIStered Investme'lt advI50r Imurance offered through Ll'lcoln afflllate5 and other fine com pan les Lincoln Financial Group IS the marketing 'lame for Lincoln Natlona 1 Corporation and III affiliates ~. " ?'" /) 7?Z~l-u~[ C(:t~'(f/VJ~ _" . .,~, (; ') /, II uJ 0' ..~~I.-r- ,,~ 0JLcLI' ~ ! w. 4L 1 7 ..-/i /-, y, ) ~ L.)--' d rzLe..--! "J::.J~'/') ~(r1..-<VAet-;\...fL.() , " -----I" i ' u- '1--dL /L...iL.l.,"-' /""'''lLf-<'j,.''-tC cJ-u./v' /U~-zJ '11 .1!.-1_ ((j /) I ccfL 0' ~ r0....<J J ~6 r./(,,1//..;0 k'--7'LJ i3~~~~+~ fr ,<Luu ..'-<..ULJ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ . uJiJ ~v?J ;t&;~7~ ~~~/~ ~,,~~-I~ , L~ (J-LUJ ;{ 0 ~ ~ ~'-"U .~'4~ 1u ~" u ".. :f'ti h. /~kv / 9o/~ I ur~@~~wnqii1 &1 :it.'" I. ~5i /JUi PlANr.,/~ & [ va..oPMtNT (~\TV Of :A!ER ~ 'r I' t , l ~ I. f p I I I I I I J I I I ' - "':- :::; J:- ~.;:-. , . ~ - '1- ~:1 ""v 1.1 (~f ',I lo'j II. + 11/ 1','1 to! o , "J , 2-' - ( )"" r(~ r~~ ~~ C) y~ "'f! =;;> 00 C) i,:j ra ,< t~ tH l"j"j - l~ l'J Q) ~rJ..>> ,'"", I">.,) .'::'~ . '(.. .5i? !;P ;";t: I -.J :-/ rt:: -- ! 11 [,11 ;U ~Jt: u-/ PI:_ 'fl ~ .J ~"A !Ffril I. !, M t""I: :v ,~ {flj;'<,i , ~ IS.!...._..2 &;= - -.. - . ?"" l ~ .(N u.., ~ C'<) I -r-. ~ "f, r,J o iD 0(0)- ::t c.n 0 ~-~ Oeo <tO~ -. -os 0- g'~3 0"< !IIJl Om~ ;Y<E: :nP-Q, p -<0 ~~g "'-J 0 0. :J '-I II - ~t..~- iii - ',<;~~ rp :r; I~ ;, - ~ ~ ~ .; (:~ " <.- y" # 'J > .' >' ~ ~\)., ~_.... ~ \lffir~ \ I ~ j , ( \ ' 1 ' ' . \ ' I I I 1 , ~, J : : ~ t ~ ~ " ~ ... III ( l r , , Ron Wenn 851 Bayway Blvd Clearwater Beach, FL 33767 September 13,2004 Mr MIchael Reynolds CIty of Clearwater 100 S Myrtle Avenue PO Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 Dear Mr Reynolds, \ As resIdents of the Clearwater Pomt Condommmm Complex, we object to the approval of the new butldmg to be bUllt at 850 Bayway Blvd We feel that allowmg the structure to exceed the normal height restnctions and to reduce the normal setback opens the door to more vanatlOns of the same land With other new construction on Clearwater Beach Llmtts have been set m the past for good reason, and we beheve those hmits should be honored If buIlders contmue to get approval to go higher and WIder With theIr new projects, where will it end? The other objection we have has to do with the overall plan for this new buIldmg It IS hard to imagine beachfront property for resIdential and hotel uruts bemg bUIlt WIthOut allOWing for a swmmung pool We feel tlus WIll create a problem for us at our complex because we have three swunmmg pools on our property It IS already a difficult task to momtor these pools so that trespassers do not use our facilities We feel tlus new buIidmg wIll defirutely Impact thts problem for us at Clearwater Pomt by mcreasmg the number of people m our lffilTIediate vicmity who would have reason to trespass Our final ObjectIon to the new building IS the Issue of parkIng Having more pennanent residents hvmg on Bayway WIll mcrease the number of cars m the area We believe that this win make It more difficult for us m our complex to find adequate street parkmg as well We hope that you wIll consider our objectIOns carefully We love Clearwater Beach and want to keep It a safe and happy place for residents and VISItorS alIke Thank you for your consideratIon of our obJectIOns Smcerely, Ron Wenn 851 So Bayway Blvd, Apt 10.... Clearwater Bch , FL 33767 727 -443-5625 September 15, 2004 Mr Michael Reynolds CIty of Clearwater 1 00 S Myrtle Ave Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 Dear Mr Reynolds I strongly object to the request by the developers of 850 Bayway (Chart House) to add to the existmg height to make It the only waters edge bUlldmg on Clearwater Pomt which exceeds 35 feet I similarly object to allowing the developer to reduce the reqUIred setback There are no motels at this end of Bayway Blvd and thIs IS a residential and very peaceful neighborhood for many many years. It IS my understandmg that the developer's project does not Include a pool whIch means our faCIlities Will be vulnerable and require more security lZ~a~' ffO/f/d~/W Elin Hagstrom ;1 544 W Wellmgton Ave ChIcago, IL 60657 773-327 -4849 September 14, 2004 Mr Michael Reynolds CIty of Clearwater 100 S Myrtle Ave Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 Dear Mr Reynolds I am a wInter resident at 851 So Bayway Blvd I strongly object to the proposed project at 850 So Bayway Blvd (Chart House) because of the negative Impact on the value of my property I object to the 35' rule, thus opening the door for future developers to do the same thing There are no motels on this end of Clearwater Beach This IS a residential section and has been peaceful for many years At present there are no bUildings on Bayway Blvd that are over 4 stones. Why IS the city allowing this developer to be the exception? Very truly yours, Id;g~ ), fll-[E- og= ~ / " ',' I :~;['::-f) I': --;r" " I 11 '-'-' U ~ , .... ~_l , ' i PlANN,t,,~ ~ DEVELOPMENT BVes j 0"" OF ClEARIJ....ATER --\.- ~1V~ I() I ,;(){JO tj -00" n 1..,C.) I ~ ,"~ \ " "....L-~ U ....r... NICHOLAS J LAGATTUTA JOEL J DEGRAZIA MATTHEW C MASON LAGATTUTA DEGRAZIA & MASON, P.C Attorneys at Law SCHAUMBURG CORPORATE CENTER 1515 WOODFiELD ROAD SUITE 880 SCHAUMBURG, 1L 60173 FiRM 847/240-5500 FAX 847/240-5825 II oj It @ ftlTWtrJiiI IUUi Sr? 15 23C', ~ I PLANNING DEVElOPMENT VCS crrr a . ClEARWATER September 10, 2004 Via Facsimile (727) 562-4865 and Regular Mail Mr Mike Reynolds Clearwater Commumty Development Board 100 South Myrtle Clearwater, Flonda 33756 Re Pubhc Board Heanng ~ September 21,2004 850 Bayway Blvd Clearwater, Flonda Mr Reynolds I am writmg with regard to the above-captioned matter I own a condommlUm at 851 Bayway Boulevard and my parents have owned one m the same bUlldmg for the last twenty-five (25) years This IS directly across the street from the proposed new construction Over the last five (5) years we have seen Clearwater Beach become over- developed We are III favor of change and growth when It IS good In this case, It IS not good A couple of examples of the problems the over-buddmg has caused have been magmfied With the roundabout and the bndge leadmg onto Clearwater Beach Both of these disasters were directly caused from the congestion as a result of the new developments The "Beach" cannot handle any more people or congestion the new developments have created What used to take fifteen (15) mmutes to get on and off the beach now takes up to mnety (90) rmnutes m a distance of less than five (5) mIles There are so many cars now on the beach that It IS no longer safe to dnve I am sure the number of aCCIdents on Clearwater Beach has gone up dramatically There IS no more land on the beach to develop It seems as though the city IS trymg to turn Clearwater Beach mto the East Coast WIth all of ltS hlgh-nses Letter to Mr Mike Reynolds September 10, 2004 Page Two SEP 2 0 2004 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES C1TY W CLEr\RlNAT!iR i The slgn at the pier says that Clearwater BeFlc:h I>: thp.:num er OA.e-~ Plonda I used to beheve It unttl the over-development started The standards that made Clearwater Beach number one have been compromIsed The current condo and home- owners are suffenng while the developers are benefitmg With regard to the proposed bUlldmg at 850 Bayway Boulevard, there IS Just not enough room to buIld more condos The yacht club bnngs traffic from the Bayway sIde and Leverocks bnngs traffic from the gulf sIde The reSidents at Clearwater Pomt are surrounded With mountmg congestIOn Because of the cul-de-sac, there IS no room for more congestIon The additional traffic IS unsafe for semors and mmor chtldren ahke Can the land available at 850 Bayway sustam a butldmg as proposed by Decade Properties, Inc? 1 thmk not' With the traffic and safety Issues the proposed bUlldmg will create, It would not be prudent to grant the permIt Please consider the reSIdents at Clearwater Pomt and the overall negatIve effect the new burldmg at 850 Bayway would have on the beach Please deny the permit to build the forty-mne (49) foot bUIldmg Thank you for your conSIderatIOn Smcereiy yours, )La} ~I NICHOLAS J LAGATTUTA Page 1 of 1 From: Tom BordJgnon [bordroom@comcast net] Sent' Sunday, September 19, 2004 742 PM To Reynolds, Mike Subject: Re 850 BaywaylChart House Location SEP 2 0 2.004 Reynolds, Mike Mr Reynolds PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF CLEARWATER ! I -! We own a condominium unit at 800 S Gultvlew Blvd, Unit 502, Clearwater Pomt We are wntlng this letter to strongly object to the proposed proJect at 850 Bayway Blvd It IS our understandmg that you are responding to the bUIlder's request for an additional 14' In height and a reduction of the reqUired is' setback to 603' We find It hard to understand why these special dispensatIons are being given to this bUilder t when all of the other new development must adhere to the specified codes This IS not fair and will be opening the door to similar vanatlons from the basIc code, whJch Will certainly detract from the fundamental character of the neighborhood There has been a lot of bUlldmg gOing on In Clearwater Beach with condo units costing $750,000 and more None of these bUildings are over four stones ThiS bUlldmg should not be given a special dispensation to be higher The owners In Clearwater POint are a large tax base and voting block We have been there for many years and feel that our concerns should be strongly considered It IS our understandIng that these units are to be rental umts and therefore should not be closer to the street They Will certainly cause more nOIse and should not be any closer than the code now requires Please do not allow thiS developer to be the exception to the basIc codes They should be made to buJld as all other developers have been reqUired to do Pnmo and Marlene Bordlgnon 741 Admiral Court Round Lake Park, IL 60073 9/2012004 Page 1 of 1 Reynolds, Mike From: r bloom [racb1 @msn com] Sent: Sunday, September 19,2004915 PM To: Reynolds, Mike Subject: 850 Bayway/Chart House Location Mr Reynolds' My name IS Peter Kentros and I live at 855 Bayway Blvd Apt. 60SC. I strongly object to the proposed project at 850 Bayway Blvd., because this directly has a negative Impact on the value of my property. Based on the plans It appears that these units will be rental unrts with people commg and gOing constantly. Who IS go 109 to buy my unit with the nOise coming from across the street? This happens now to a lesser extent with no one on the property for supervision. Place a larger structure on thIs piece of land and the problem becomes greater. There are no motels on this end of Bayway Blvd. This IS a reSIdentIal section and has been peaceful for many years This brings me to another po lOt. I believe your department has not been lookmg out for the residents of Clearwater POint which has a large tax base and voting block. I feel your department has bent over backwards for the developer In approving TWO vanances so the developer can bUild the bUlldmg he wants and not what IS In the best mterest of the resIdents of Clearwater Pomt and Clearwater Beach. At present there are no bUildings on Bayway that are over four stOries This developer got from your department a variance to go fourteen feet plus a roof over code. He also got a variance to have his property SIX feet from the pavement There has been a lot of bUlldmg gOing on In Clearwater Beach with condo units costing $750,000+. None of these bUildings are over four stones Why should the city allow thiS developer to be the exception? Peter Kentros 855 Bayway Blvd. Clearwater Beach, FL 33767 L__ PLANNING & DEVELOPMEN1 SERViCe CIT'-' OF CLE/IC1WATER 9120/2004 Reynolds, Mike From' Sent: To: Subject' Fred Betz [FBetz@pedcoea com] Monday, September 20, 2004 7 15 AM Reynolds, Mike 850 Bayway Blvd fetter ~ letter 9-17 -04 doc Mr Reynolds Attached to thls emall lS a letter regardlng the proposed proJect at 850 Bayway Blvd I have malled the orlglnal of thls letter Vla US Mall In case It doesn't arrlve before tomorrow's hearlng, I am sendlng It Vla emall also. Fred w. Betz, P E. PEDCo E&A Servlces Inc 11499 Chester Road SUlte 301 Clnclnnatl, Qhlo 45246 (513) 782-4927 (513) 378-1394 cell (513) 782-4950 fax fbetz@pedcoea com www pedcoea.com --- CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT --- Thls e-mall tranSffilSSlon contalns lnformatlon that lS lntended to be prlvlleged and confldentlal It lS In- tended only for the addressee named above If you re- celve thls e-mall In error, please do not read, copy or dlssemlnate It In any manner If you are not the lntended reclplent, any dlsclosure, copYlng, dlstr1- but10n or use of the contents of thls lnformat1on lS proh1b1ted please reply to the message lmmedlately by lnforrn1ng the sender that the message was rnlsdlrected After replY1ng, please erase lt from your computer system Your ass1stance 1n correct1ng th1S error lS appreclated. ijrE~rEDWrE rr7 lflJ SEP 2 0 2lX14 ifJi PLANNING & DEV I SERVICE;lOPMENT CITY OF C ! LEARWATER 1 Reynolds, Mike From: Sent: To: Subject, AMY DALESSANDRO [ADALESSA@centralsta1esfunds or Fnday, September 17, 2004443 PM Reynolds, Mike Objection 10 Proposed Project at 850 Bayway Blvd M Almlnar91504 doc Dear Mr. Reynolds, We respectfully submlt our prOJect at 850 Bayway Blvd Please lnclude thlS letter September 21, 2004 attached letter ObJ8ctlng to the In the dlscusslons about thls proJect on o ~~~~~M~ D\I PLANNING & nEVElOPMENT SEQVICES crrv Of. ClE ,f:!'N!ITEIl " A-Untna r" If you have any questlons, you may contact my husband, Patrlck, at hlS off1ce 847-967-9320 or me at adalessa@centralstatesfunds org Thank you for your consldertatlon, Patrlck & Amy Dalessandro 1 September 17, 2004 Mr Michael Reynolds Senior Planner City of Clearwater 100 S Myrtle Ave. POBox 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SE R\/ICES CITY OF CLE"RWATER Re. Objections to the Proposed "Almlnar" Project, 850 S Bayway Blvd Dear Mr Reynolds' My name IS Patrick A Dalessandro and my wife, Amy, and I are the owners of Unit C-404 at 855 S Bayway Blvd We greatly object to the proposed "Almlnar" project at 850 S. Bayway Blvd. We belIeve that thIs project, as currently proposed, would be a detriment to the Clearwater POint community by fundamentally changing the character of thIs neighborhood. ZOning ordinances are put In place to ensure the safety of the public and to preserve the character and Integnty of a communIty. Granting the developer a vanance to reduce the reqUIred setback from 15' to 6 03' is a potential nsk to public safety as IS the potential for Increased traffic and the problems that come with a more transient population In a resIdential communIty. Allowing the developer to add 14' feet to the height of the eXisting structure would make this project the only water's edge bUIldIng on Clearwater POInt to exceed 35 feet. Granting vanances such as these sets a dangerous precedent for future development It opens the door to sImilar vanations from the code that wIll certainly detract from the character of the Clearwater POint community, and they Will certaInly be cIted as examples by future developers seeking bUIlding variances. Although the CIty maintains that the "loss of view" IS not a valId reason for objectIng to the proposal, we disagree. My Wife and I are licensed Real Estate Brokers and I have over 32 years expenence In selling resIdential and commercial properties The vIew or "loss of vIew" does have an economic impact on property values Other things being equal, properties with a vIew of the water or good site-lines on a golf course typically command a higher value than those with a vIew of a wall or a rooftop laden wIth ventIlation Units. As a bUSinessman, I apprecIate the City'S deSIre for new development and the opportunity to enhance ItS tax base As a property owner, I choose to maintain a condominIum on the fourth floor of the Commodore bUilding because I enjoy the character of this community as It currently eXists New development In an established commumty requIres careful balance and consIderation ThIS proposal overly favors the developer to the detriment of many resIdents In the surrounding properties and we therefore request that thiS project be denied as It IS currently proposed We are sure that If the developer IS a quality bUilder Mr MIchael Reynolds September 17,2004 Page Two r:-- ..-..., ~~ .., '"\ r'---'" rr----" o J;:~; l!JJ1 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF CLEARWATER With integrity, he or she will be Interested In developing aesth-etlcally pleasing properties that both enhance the neighborhood they are located In and produce a substantial profitable return on the Investment We are sure that a compromIse can be reached regarding the setback and heIght variance requests. Thank you for your consIderation. Sincerely, Patrick A Dalessandro A. M Dalessandro 610 N Maple Prospect Heights, IL 60070 and 855 S. Bayway Blvd, Unit C404 Clearwater Beach, FL 33767 Page 1 of 1 From HSch104229@aol com Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 2 39 PM To: Reynolds, Mike Subject: [BULK] 850 Bayway project Importance: Low Reynolds, Mike SEP 2 0 2004 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF CLEARWATER Dear Mr Reynolds, My name IS Harold J Schultz and I own and occupied a Condominium at 302 AdmIral House Clearwater POint It has been brought to my attention that everyone at Clearwater POint has been notified as to a project at 850 SayWay I am sorry to Inform you that I am one, of possibly many that have not received any notification to modify or change design by eXisting Code Secondly, I am In full objection to any projects that are out of character with the surrounding neighborhood, eXisting bUilding codes or prevIously agreed upon design elements Clearwater POint, for all practical purpose IS residential condominium development I am equally surpnsed how the eXisting Chart House/hotel was ever permJ1ted to be bUilt, let alone now the City of Clearwater granting a variances permit that violate eXisting bUilding codes It IS one thing for the City to explore redevelopment and yes, that IS progress, but when you deviate from eXisting code by granting to modification to eXisting height and setback reqUirements In an eXisting community IS down nght wrong and shameful The City needs a human factor applied to these decISions Just ask yourself, how would you feel hvmg next to a Hotel sitting next to the highway With Increased tranSients, traffiC and parking Congestion Thank you for the time to express my opinion Harold J SchuJtz 9/2012004 Page 1 of 1 From' The Verblns [akklva@venzon net] Sent. Wednesday, September 15, 2004553 PM To: Reynolds, Mike Cc' Gertrude Verbln SubJect: 850 Bayway/Chart House Location SEP 2 0 2004 Reynolds, Mike Dear Mr Reynolds, PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF CLEAqWA1ER I am Martm Verbm and my address IS 830 S Gulf VIew Blvd, Apt #804 I have been a resIdent and taxpayer of Clearwater Beach for over 18 years. I fmd this proposal for the project at 850 Bayway Blvd to be an ImposIoon on our local commumty I also feel your perrmttmg two vanances to be Issued WIthout takmg mto conSideratIOn the local property owners m the area ThIs proposal will have an affect on the aesthetIcs of our area and will tend to reduce the value of our property In VIew of the above 1t would be strongly apprecIated If you would reconsIder your deCISIOn concernmg thiS project and deny the two vanances Very truly yours, Martm Verbm Keep unwanted emml out VISit www spamsubtract com for more mfonnatIOn. 9120/2004 Page 1 of 1 From: THOMAS CARAGHER [tomarl1 @msn com] Sent. Wednesday, September 15, 2004826 PM To Reynolds, Mike Subject: 850 Bayway/Chart House Location Reynolds, Mike PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF CLEARWATER Mr, Reynolds Since we Will be unable to attend the September 21st meeting, like countless other residents who do not live here full time, we are vOICing our strong objection to the above bUilding plans We feel that giving the bUilding an extra 14' IS out of Ime and a vlolatJOn of the bUilding codes We want to see an official deCISion that gives you a nght to do this. We want to see a deCISion OK'd by the Plnellas County Board and the Clearwater City CommissIon. There are enough hotels/motels In the area (with more planned) and we don't need another such Unit In our residential area We belIeve thIS Will be a detnment to the re- sale value of our condos. Because, If you do thiS, maybe we could add 14' to our low nse condos and 50' to our high rise condos. The zoning codes were made for everyone and for good reasons, You have no regard for these rules. You also are vJOlatlng the eXisting bUilding code by letting the bUilder build 6' from the curb How many rules can be changed? We really resent you haVing thiS meeting In September. you must realize that about only 25% of the reSidents of our bUildings Will be here .. With the other 75% not arriving until November or December. We Challenge you to have thiS meeting In December. and we Will all be there We are Flonda reSidents and pay our taxes and vote here Arlene and Tom Caragher 830 S Gulf view Blvd #704 Clearwater Beach, FI 33767 9/20/2004 Page 1 of 1 From' Maggle&Bernle [MAGBERNFLA@peoplepc com] Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2004 910 AM To: Reynolds, Mike Cc: CLWPT 7 Subject: 850 Bayway Blvd Project Reynolds, Mike SEP 2 0 2004 PLANNING & DEVElOPMENl SE R\lICES Cln' OF CLEr,qWA TEq My wife and I are residents of 851 Bayway Blvd We believe the proJect scheduled for 850 Bayway will become a real problem for us, The height of the building IS higher than anything else bUilt on our street for last couple of years. Granting height variance is shortsighted and will not help residentlaJ atmosphere we have. The developers wanted to build a taller building and resubmitted a shorter structure but it will stili be an eyesore in our residential area. We are against such a proJect and are surprised how it could have gotten so far along without any notification to local residents. Bernard and Maureen Brennan 851 Bayway#101 Clearwater, FI 33767 9/20/2004 Reynolds, Mike Subject' Vern Bilby [BIGBASSBILBY@Earthllnk net] Thursday, September 16, 2004 1059 AM gordonk@ starband net FBETZ@aol com, BIGBASSBILBY@Earthllnk net, jlblack830@myexcel com, SONIABOUT@sbcglobal net, T JBRADY@totallnk net, magbernfla@peoplepc com, DABUSA@YAHOOcom, GMACCOACH@aol com, CDAVIS@nnlcom, DUBEC@ca Inter net, DEERFLYNN@aolcom, HEUREUXL@aolcom, GERIL67@aol com, YGOMEZ@bellsouth net, DON@abc ca, KEJEH@msn com, NIMREDY@aol com, KUCHIBHOTLA KRISHNA@venzon net, THOMASK@angkJrcom, NICOLE LHEUREUX@fd ulaval ca, ICIMIKE@aol com, LLEVIT@comcast net, BAYWAY408 @msncom, MANOUAS2@aolcom, MURREYMAR@aolcom, DIANE MARSTERS@palmasdelmar com, RMICHALEKPHS@Yls us, MIKHAILADEL@aolcom, DUSIU@aolcom, DIARUZ@aolcom, BOB RYAN@expresspersonnel com, SABELS@prodlgy net, GSCHLlESINGER@cludad com ar, KSEILER1 @knology net, NIZAE@aol com, LEEBEASMITH@webtv net, SUSANWATT@canada com, WATTSUPLUCY@Earthllnk net, RlDEA@aol com, Reynolds, Mike, Clearwater POint 7 Condominium Office Re 850 Bayway Blvd From: Sent: To: Cc: Dr Gordon and Nancy Klockow, My husband and I also own a un1t In the Commodore bUl1dlng at Clearwater POlnt ~ 7 We feel you have some very valld concerns and we share your thoughts As you mentloned, we (Clearwater POlnt 7) do not own the Vlews, but 1f we allow thlS proJect to contlnue, what wl11 be next? I thlnk we all know the answer to that questlon Progress and change lS good as long as lt doesn't lmpose problems and effect other people and thelY r1ghts We certa1nly oppose any proJect that would do otherwlse It lS our hope we all wlIl Thank you for your support. speak out and protect our vested lnterest o ~(C~~~~ 0'\: SEP 2 0 2004 J Faye & Vern B11by Greenwood, Indlana bllby94@yahoo com > Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 9'32 PM SubJect Re 850 Bayway Blvd Pl.JI,NN1NG & OEVElOPMENl SERviCES CITY OF CLE,V'1VIf'lTEIl > Dear 8ernle and all, > > please clarlfy several lssues for Nancy and me I see Mr M1ke Reynolds' > name llsted ln one locatlon as Senlor ProJect Planner- assUffilng that he lS > worklng for the bUllder of thls proJect and on h1S return address, I note > that he has an address wlth the Clearwater Clty Government As the lncomlng > chlef law enforcement offlcer of our county here In Indlana, a sltuatlon > such as thls would be construed as a confllct of lnterest and I would have > to recuse myself from sltt1ng In Judgement on the plannlng commlSS1on > > I am further bothered by the loss of rlght-of-way to the street and am > concerned that thlS loss would compromlse securlty and access of emergency > vehlcles to the pOlnt beyond thlS structure I am furthered concerned lf > there lS sufflclent flre and emergency access to the bUlldlng ltself glven > the the added helght and loss of access from the street > > Whl1e we may not "own the vlew", we are certalnly entltled to malntaln 1 the > lack of nOlse at thls end of the lsland and we are certalnly entltled to > malntaln the level of secur1ty and amblence for WhlCh we have all labored so > hard to develop > > I would appreclate clarlflcatlon of any of the pOlnts that I have ralsed > from anyone prlor to my sesnd1ng a letter of obJectlon to thls proJect > Thank you for your help > > Dr Gordon and Nancy Klockow > Rensselaer, Indlana > Yacht House #405 > ----- Orlglnal Message > From: "Clearwater P01nt 7 Condomln1um Offlce" <> Sent. Saturday, September 11, 2004 9 30 AM > subJect. 850 Bayway Blvd > > > > We are send~ng all resldents the followlng letter we hope each of you > > flle and ohJectlon to thlS proJect Meet~ng on 9/21 lS only flrst step for > > us to oppose thlS proJect. > > > > Bernle > > > > Re > > > > On Thursday, September 9th Pat Ruzzo, SWlm Club Presldent, Lee Connor (CP8 > > Board Member), Bernle & Maggle Brennan met wlth Mlchael Reynolds, Sen10r > > planner for thlS Clearwater Beach proJect We are currently havlng them > > provlde us w~th coples of data regard~ng thls proJect. There wlll be > > further dlScusslon next week > > > > Our dlscover1es yesterday seem to lndlcate that all the formal~t1es and > > paperwork has been properly done and approved by Clearwater offlc1als. > > The scheduled meetlng for September 21st, although open to the publlC, > > leaves us Ilttle room to organ~ze or present arguments that may change > > thelr dec1S1ons to approve thls proJect called &#147,Almlnar &#148, > > > > > > > > 850 Bayway/Chart House Locatlon Everyone at Clearwater Po~nt was malled not~flcatlon, and they sald c~tlzen response lS the most recognlzed ldea of obJectlon that they measure, other than presentatlons that wlll be made on thls ~n mlnd, we are asklng each resldent to wr~te Mr. (or e-rnall) at the follow1ng address " > > > > Mlchael Reynolds > > Clty of Clearwater > > 100 S. Myrtle Ave > > POBox 4748 > > Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 > > Mlke reynolds@myclearwater > > > > > > SEP 2 0 2004 0\ \ I I > > > > com pU\NNING & DEVELOPMEN1 SERVICES &#-~4 7, loss::rffiOF CLE,.\RWATER You need to VOlce your obJectlons on lssues other than v~ew&#-148, WhlCh they feel ~s not a good enough reason because It&#146,s not yours > > to > > lose Other grounds for ob]ectlon are' > > &#149, The approval of the developers request to add 14&#146, to the > > eXlstlng > > helght (from 35&#146, to 49&#146,) maklng the bu~ldlng the only waters > > edge bu~ldlng > > on Clearwater POlnt WhlCh exceeds 35 feet > > &#149, Allowlng the developer to reduce the requ1red 15&#146, setback to > > 6 03&#146, > > &#149, Open~ng the door to slrnllar var~atlons from the baslc code, whlch 2 > > wlll certalnly detract ~_Jm the fundamental character o. le ne.1.ghborhood > >  The developer&#146,s proJect does not 1nclude a pool whlch means > > our > > facll1t1es wl11 be vulnerable and requlre more securlty > > > > YOU NEED TO TAKE ACTION IMMEDIATELY IF MR. REYNOLDS IS TO RECEIVE THIS > > BEFORE SEPTEMBER 21, 2004 > > > - ro')~(crE~~~! u,-~, I lFU SEP 2 0 2004 lb!J I PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF CLE,\RWATER 3 From: Sent: To: SubJect Stngenz [ruergen@execpc com] Thursday, September 16, 2004306 PM Reynolds, Mike 850 Bayway/Chart House SEP 2 0 2004 Re no Ids, Mike I would not be In favor of weekly rental unlts near or ln OUF resldentlal nelghborhood of Clearwater POlnt as thls proJect may suggest I do not approve of the varlances on the proJect please reVlew these concerns conslder1ng thlS locatlon PLANNING & r::EVElOPMENT SEnVICES CITY OF CLE,\PWATER Mr Reynolds, Juergen Strlgenz 855 Bayway Blvd. #207 1 Frank Gerlock Development Review Manager City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Ave Clearwater, FL 33757 [) ~(C~~'W~ W\ Xi SEP 20~ ~i I PLAI'!r.,JING E. nEVElOPMENl 1 SEP.\!ICES CI rv n" c [ ,W'^ fEll Dear Sir We recently received a notice of a bUilding permit request for construction at 850 Bayway Blvd In Clearwater Beach My wife and I own a retirement condominium In the Shipmaster BUlldmg at 800 South Gulf View Blvd, across the street to the southwest from the permit site. There IS no question that Intense redevelopment of Clearwater Beach IS In full sWing. Permits are being Issued for massive projects that are changing the face and character of the beach area People buy retirement properties so that after a life of hard work, they can spend some or most of their time In FlOrida enJoYing the great attributes the state has to offer. It IS our opinion that we should expect reasonable effort from the City of Clearwater to protect the value of our properties and the character of the lifestyle ThiS permIt violates both of the stated criteria The 'Point' IS reasonably complete from a development standpoint. There IS an effective staging of the heights of bUildings from the center to the water, with views that have been established for dozens of years The feeling of open space also benefits from the setback between the Sidewalk and the bUilding fronts, and from some space between the bUildings Consistency In the bUlldmg heights along the water and the high-rises In the center creates a planned and polIshed look for the POint. The value of our propertIes depends on protecting these attributes Increasing the value of the permit property at the expense of hundreds of condo owners nearby IS not fair No redevelopment In the POint area should be allowed to front up to the Sidewalk Also, views should be maintained, essentially as they currently are with no sIgnificant Increase In bUilding heights ThiS permit should be emphatically denied Respectfully, Richard A. and Sandra L. Kitto 53397 Place SE BeJlevue, WA 98004 rakltto@ aol com 425-454-4555 Page 1 of 1 From: RAKltto@aol com Sent: Thursday, September 16,2004620 PM To: Reynolds, Mike Subject: BUIlding Permit for 850 Bayway Reynolds. Mike SEP 2 0 2004 PLANNING & OE\'ELOPMEN1 SERVICES CI fV or CLE,.\RINA TER Dear Mike, Attached IS a letter I wrote concemmg the proposed construction at 850 Bayway It was sent to Frank Gerlock as his name was on the notice I received In the mall I am afraid that little concern for the people that live or own property on the Pomt was given when this permit was apparently approved It would be good If a much slower and more Critical approach to the permit process was taken for Clearwater Beach The rate of change for the area IS breathtaking, to say the least Respectfully, Richard A Kitto 533 97th Place SE Bellevue, WA 98004 Shipmaster #704 425-454-4555 9/20/2004 Page I of 2 " Reynolds, Mike From' Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Importance Mlkhalladel@aol com Thursday, September 16, 2004 6 29 PM Reynolds, Mike cpolnt7 @ knology net [BULK] "Almlnar" ProJect, 850 Bayway Blvrd Low o ~(C~~Yl~ -0' \\ SEP '2 0 2004 \ PLANNING & DEVElOPMEN1 SERVICES CITY OF CLEARWATER ..J Mr Michael Reynolds City of Clearwater Mr. Reynolds As an owner of a condo apartment In the bUIlding across the street (851 Bayway) from the proposed proJect, I strongly oppose the approval of the above~referenced project for several obvIous reasons' The vast majority of this qUiet area at the end of the boulevard (almost like a dead end road) has been resIdential In nature with a large population of retired people, who purchased their property based on the quiet, peaceful and relatively secure character of this neighborhood. The "Almmar" project Will substantially Increase the rental Units In the area wIth concomitant Increase In commotion and nOise. I was personally attracted to buy In the area primarily for Its relative Isolation from the nOise and crowded atmosphere of the hotel/motel-rich Gulfvlew Blvd The proposed variances allow for an Increase of bUilding height from 35 ft to 49 ft Moreover, The required setback Will be reduced from 15 ft to 6 ft, resulting In a bUilding that IS oddly much taller and larger In size than other neIghboring bUildings on the waters edge In thiS Clearwater POint ThiS Will detract from the fundamental character of thIS neighborhood, ItS beauty and elegance Besides, thiS allowance Will set a precedent which can destroy the character of thiS area. Without a sWimming pool on the proposed enlarged motel, there Will be an added burden on our sWimming pools requiring more man power to monitor intrudIng users. And with more strangers coming and gOing In the proposed larger motel, there WIll be added burden on the security of our bUilding and ItS reSidents Needless to say, also, the beauty of the vIew from apartment windows IS an Important component of Its value, and thiS project Will Impair the water front view of our apartments For all of the above reasons, I honestly believe we Will be harmed and that our condos will lose a lot of their attractiveness and value If that "Almlnar" project IS approved I therefore strongly request that you do not approve thiS project variances, particularly that many other motels and condo bUildings In the area and In Clearwater Beach are four stones or less. Adel Mikhail, Ph D 651 Bayway Blvd., umt 707 9/2012004 6875 Anglebluff Circle I Dallas, Texas 75248 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SER viCES CI fV OF CL[.\J:lWA TER 1- ___ September 14, 2004 Mr Michael Reynolds, Semor Planner City of Clearwater - POBox 4748 Clearwater, Honda 33758-4748 RE Almmar Proposal Dear Mr Reynolds As we are not able to attend the scheduled meeting of September 21st, 2004, concernmg the Almmar ( 850 Bayway Boulevard) and hve on the Pomt at 855 Bayway Boulevard - Commodore 707, we are wntmg to VOice our concerns regardmg thiS subrmtted proposal Htstoncally, our city has had codes and regulations m place for proper commumty layout and enVIrons protectmg the current resIdents, their chIldren, and generations to come WIth th1S legacy m mmd, the city . should not grant vanances or Waivers to codes and regulations m place for specIal mterest mdlvlduals, groups, or developers, . should preserve and mamtam established structuresfbUlldmgs heights and setbacks as per code WIthout exceptIOn, . should respect and foster the farmly and residentIal character of the neIghborhood, Ie, a commumty wlthm a cornmumty, and . should protect and enhance the value of eXlstmg properties, e g , addItIonal heIght, lessened setback from the street, blockage from the water, would result m a drop m value and econonnc hardship for current tax payers Mr. Reynolds, we trust that you w111 honor the umqueness of the Pomt for years to come and not approve the Alnnnar Proposal Smcerely, Rudolph (Rudy) and Chnstme ( Chns ) Michalek 855 So Bayway Blvd ,Apt 703 Clearwater Beach, FL 33767 September 17, 2004 Mr MIchael Reynolds City of Clearwater 100 S. Myrtle Ave Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF CLEARWATER Dear Mr. Reynolds As a 12 year resident of the area of the proposed development "Almlnar" on Bayway Blvd, I am extremely concerned that this heanng IS planned when a majority of resIdents of adjacent properties are out of town It appears that this IS being acted upon to avoid citIzen partIcIpation of the majority of effected citIzens and thus denYing them a vOice which could effect their property. I am also concerned that variances of height and nearness to street Will exceed present code restrictIons therefore be dIsregarded. I urge delay of this meeting In order to provide a balance of proposed plan Sincerely, Lucy Watts Page 1 of 1 Reynolds, Mike From: Fred or Mary Vouk [voukao@yahoo com] Sent: Fnday, September 17,20041041 AM To: Reynolds, Mike Subject: [BULK] Opposition to 850 Bayway Blvd Importance' Low '0 ~ ~ (C [E ~\If [E 0- -~y lJl.l SEP 2 0 3J04 I Mr MIchael Reynolds CIClty of Clearwater 100 S Myrtle Ave Box 4748 Clearwater, PI PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF CLEARWATER Dear Mr. Reynolds, Our names are Fred and Mary Vouk and we bve at 851 S Bayway Blvd Apt. 305 We strongly object to the proposed project at 850 Bayway Blvd, because thiS d1rectly has a negative Impact on the value of our property. Based on the plans It appears that these umts wIll be rental umts with people commg and gomg constantly Who IS gomg to buy our umt W1th the nOise commg from across the street? We believe that your department has not been lookmg out for the residents of Clearwater Pomt, WhICh has a large tax base and votmg block We feel your department has bent over backwards for the developer m approvmg TWO vanances so the developer can buIld the bUlldmg he wants and not what IS m the best mterest of the resldents of Clearwater Pomt and Clearwater Beach At present there are no bmldmgs on Baway that are over four stones Th1S developer got a vanance to go fourteen feet plus a roof over code from your department I He also got a vanance to have hIS property SIX feet from the pavement There has been a lot of bUildmg gomg on m Clearwater Beach With condo umts costmg $750,000+ None of these bUlldmgs are over four stones Why should the C1ty allow thIS developer to be the exceptIOn? Smcerely, Fred 0 V ouk Mary L Vouk 851 S Bayway Blvd Apt 305 Clearwater Beach, FI 33767 Do you Yahoo!? vote yahoo com - RegIster onlme to vote today! 9/20/2004 Reynolds, Mike From' Sent: To: Cc: SubJect: gohernandez@ jOlmal1 com Fnday, September 17,2004855 PM Reynolds, Mike gohernandez@jOlmall com [BULK] 850 Bayway Blvd Project Importance, Low Our name lS Gllberto & Carmen Hernandez and we Ilve at 800 Gulfv1ew Blvd South Unlt~ 401 Shlpmaster BUlldlng 1 The followlng lS to let you know that we strongly obJect the proJect at 850 Bayway Blvd because thls dlrectly has a negatlve lmpact on our property value Base on the plans, lt appears that these unlts wlIl be rental unlts w1th people comlng and gOlng constantly. Who lS gOlng to buy our unlt wlth the nOlse comlng from across the street? ThlS happens now to a lesser extent wlth no one on the property for supervlSlon Place a larger structure on thlS plece of land and the problem becomes much greater Ther are no motels on thlS end of Bayway Blvd Thls lS a resldentlal sectlon and has been peaceful for many years Thls brlngs us to another pOlnt. We belleve your department has not been looklng out for the resldents of Clearwater POlnt WhlCh has a large tax base and vot1ng block We feel your department has bent over backwards for the developer ln approVlng TWO var1ances so the developer can bUlld the bUlldlng he wants and not what lS In the best lnterewt of the resldents of Clearwater POlnt and Clearwater Beach At the present there are no bUlldlngs on Bayway that are over four stor1es Thls developer got from your department a varlance to go fourteen feet plus a roof over code He also got a varlance to have hlS property SlX feet from the pavement There has been a lot of bUlldlng gOlng on ln Clearwater Beach wlth condo un1ts costlng $750,000+. None of these bUlldlngs are over four storles. Why should the Clty allow thlS developer to be an except1on? We appreclate your cons1deratlon to our complaltn aglnst th1S new bUlldlng WhlCh we greatly oppose Thanks for your attentlon Gllberto 0 Hernandez Hernandez Carmen 1 q)~(c~~~lE 0' I: SEP 2 0 2004 \ \ PLANNING & OEVElOPMENl SERVICES CITY or CLE,\RWATER Page 1 of 1 Reynolds, Mike From: Sent: To: Subject William Granzlg [sndcpts@tampabay rr com] Saturday, September 18, 2004 6 57 AM Reynolds, Mike 850 Bayway Development - q)~(C~ij~lE 0' ,! SEP 2 0 2004 \ Mr Rweynolds, My name IS William Granzlg, I live at 830 S Gulf view Blvd PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF CLE,\RWATER Your approval for the redevelopment at 850 Bayway shows one again that the entire leadershIp team of Clearwater needs to be replaced It IS obvIous that the greed associated with this project superceeds any respect \ concern for the character of the neighborhood and or for any of ItS residents You and everyone who endorses this project as proposed are disgusting and should give senous thought to why they serve In the positions that the're In William Granzlg 9/20/2004 Page 1 of 1 Reynolds, Mike From: dawn [dawnmk2000@comcast net] Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2004 12 49 PM To' Reynolds, Mike Subject: Re 850 Bayway/Chart House Locatrons Importance: High - ---, OJ~(C~~~~ 0\\: '\ 1, SEP 2 0 2004 I Please read attachment regarding Almlnar Development Thank Yau John Bagdon PLANr>.JING & DEVELOPt"lENT SEnVICES CITY OF ClE,\RWATER 9/20/2004 09/1712004 irOJ~(C~ij~~ ~1 <. SEP 2 0 2004 0 Mr MIchael Reynolds Sentor Planner City of Clearwater 100 S Myrtle Ave POBox 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 MIke revnolds@myclearwater com PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF CLEARWATER _I L_ Re 850 Bayway/Chart House LocatIOns Mr Reynolds: I am a res1dent of Clearwater Pomt. I resIde at 800 S Gulfv1ew Blvd, Clearwater, FL 33767-3026 I have been a res1dent of Clearwater at thIS address as well as another for better than 30 years. I have seen much development m the Clearwater Beach and Pomt area m th1S span of years Development eIther commercial or resIdential should have a benefic1al effect upon the commumty where It IS placed Development should also not negatively affect the property values of long standmg res1dentlal umts or the enjoyment of the qualIty of hfe of the resIdents of those umts Property values on the beach and pomt m Clearwater as you know are detenruned by proxnruty to the beach as well as VIew of the gulf, bay and beach It provIdes Why IS 1t that a development IS approved that dlfectly effects property values and the quahty of hfe of md1V1duals? Ordmances and bUlldmg codes are set mto law for vahd reasons They ensure not only safety of constructIOn but also ensure that CItizens whom may be Impacted negatively by constructIOn of a structure are protected by the law. WIth these pomts III mmd let's examme the Almmar Development that has been approved With vanances. The followmg pomts of mterest should be considered . The approval of the vanance m heIght A 14 foot vanance from ordmances and code Allowmg the heIght of the structure to be extended from 35 'to 49' ThIS vanance wlll make It the only structure on Clearwater Pomt that wlll exceed 35' The heIght vanance w111 dIrectly affect the property values and the resIdent's nght to mamtam the1r current qualIty of hfe by "loss of VIew" . The approval of the developer to reduce the current code of 15' to 603'. ThlS wlIl also "break-up the VIew of the shorehne . ThIS development also does not mclude space for a pnvate reSIdentIal pool Other slll111ar structures on the Pomt do ThlS wllI Illvlte "pool hoppers" mto current residential pools. Thus requInng mcreased cost of secunty to resIdents of eXlstmg structures to patrol unauthonzed use of their pools No others structures on Bayway currently exceed four stones but this developer has managed to achieve the needed vanances from you to bUild this development The only way this development IS a boom to the city IS through added tax dollars that would be collected What good are these addItIonal tax dollars If this development actually causes a decrease 10 property values? I am sure that If thIS project was allowed to go forward that there WIll be many requests for reassessments ThIS development has upset many longtime reSIdents of both Clearwater PolOt and Beach Is the city ready to defend the approval of the vanances 10 bUIldmg code to the mevItable laWSUIts stemmmg from res1dents for the "loss of v1ew", loss of property value and loss of quah ty of hfe? The developer can bUild luxury umts m thiS area whIle achIevmg hiS profIt marg10 Without the consequence of negatively affect10g others. D''''.. ! \1 I S1Ocerely, 1\ O)~~~ij\V1~ lSlj SEP 2 0 2004 John Bagdon 800 S Gulfv1ew BI vd Clearwater, FL 33767-3026 Tel 727-442-1761 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF CLEARWATER Page 1 of 1 Reynolds, Mike From: jwlablack [jlblack830@myexcel comJ Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2004 3 30 PM To. Reynolds, Mike Subject: Regarding letter to neighbors of 850 So Bayway Blvd, Clearwater, FI Subject: 850 So. Bayway Blvd. Dear Mr. Reynolds As an owner of a condo In the Sallmaster bUilding across the street from the proposed project, I strongly oppose the approval of the above referenced project. The major reason I purchased my property at Clearwater POint IS because of the qUiet, peaceful and relatively secure neighborhood. It IS Isolated from the hustle/bustle of Clearwater Beach and all the nOise. The variances that you have proposed allow for an Increase In bUilding height from 35ft to 49ft. and a required bUilding setback from 15ft. to 6ft. This wIll result In a much taller and larger bUilding on the waters edge at Clearwater POint It WIll detract from the character and beauty of this very fine neighborhood I do not want a new precedence set, of this nature. As I don't see a sWimming pool In the plans, there Will be an added burden on our property Including our sWimming pools at Clearwater POint. It Will require us to add Increased mOnitoring to our swimming pool areas, Needles to say, the beauty of the view from our condos Will be Impaired by a bUilding of this nature Being a neighbor of thIs proJect, I would like to have input as to what actually is going to be built there. With all the above reasons, I feel we Will be harmed with such a project and that our condo bUIlding Will lose much of It'S value, beauty and character. Many of the motels and townhouse buildings In this area are only four stones or less I therefore strongly request that you do not approve these project variances. Leslie & Judith Black 830 So. Gulfvlew Blvd SUIte 503 Clearwater, FI 33767 I~~(C~~~~ 0- y lIll SEP 2 0 2004 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF CLEARWATER 9120/2004 Mr Reynolds My name IS Noel McCarthy and J IJve at 865 So Gulf view Blvd, Apt 308 I strongly object to the proposed Project at 850 Bayway Blvd because this directly has a negative Impact on the value of my property ThIs IS a residentIal section and IS peaceful but based on the plans It appears that these units will generate people coming and gomg constantly and mcrease the nOise level In addition thiS would result In an added expense to me for pool security and tremendously Increase traffic congestion In the pOint Finally why should thiS developer be allowed to vanate from the bUIlding code which will detract from the fundamental character of the neighborhood Noel McCarthy 865 So Gulfvlew Blvd Apt 308 Clearwater Beach, FL 33767 Wq)[EtlE~~[E \\ \ PLANNING & OEVElOPMEN1 I \ SEI1JICES I Of',' OF CLEARWATER Subject Almmar Project at 850 S FLD2004-04026 ,- SepteTr\ber 17-,-'J00~-::::':':. -1 n_J)~C;'~~'W~' O'\i I \ lUll SEP 2 0 2004 \ Bayway Blvd Clearwater BeaclfLANNING & DEVELOPMENT , SERVICES CITY OF CLEARWATER Mr Michael Reynolds CIty of Clearwater 100 SD Myrtle Ave POBox 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 \ I J We own property at 855 S Bayway Blvd. In the Clearwater POInt complex on Clearwater Beach It IS our understandIng that the property at 850 S Bayway Blvd, whIch 1S across the street from our property, IS bemg considered for vanances that allow It to, 1 grow from 35 feet to 45 feet In heIght, and 2. reduce the setback from the property hne to 6 feet from the reqUlred 15 feet We strongly oppose th1S request There IS no acceptable reason to grant any code vanances for thIS property The codes were establIshed to set a "standard" for the area and we belIeve that all owners should respect that "standard". SpecIfically, a 6 foot setback 18 more sUitable for an alley or a downtown area, not a respected resort area such as Clearwater Beach With on-street parkmg III front of the bUlldmg, a 6 foot setback would severely restnct emergency vehIcle and personnel access It would create both a dangerous sltuatlOn and an undesIrable V1SUal effect on the area's aesthetIcs The heIght extenSIOn form 35 feet to 49 feet would also create an undesIrable difference between that bUtldmg and the nearby waterfront bUlldmgs Agam, there IS no reason to grant an exceptIOn to the "standards" for the area. As preVIously stated, we oppose grantIng of these specifIC vanances and generally oppose any vanances from the estabhshed codes and standards DespIte the fact that we currently res1de outsIde of Flonda, we have purchased on Clearwater Beach and mtend to relocate there when we retire m the not-to-rustant future We pay property taxes (10 fact, h1gher than the reSIdents) and deserve the nght to be heard on thIS Issue It would be a come for us to retIre to Flonda only to fmd the character of Clearwater Beach had changed undeslfably from when we purchased Due to work comnutments, we are not able to attend the heanng on thIS matter, but we trust that our VOIces w111 be heard through thIS correspondence Donna and Fred Betz 5384 PlOneer Dr Cmcmnatl, OH 45247 Owners of Umt 908, 855 S Bayway Blvd, Clearwater Beach, FL 33767 Reynolds, Mike Subject: Vern Bilby [BIGBASSBILBY@Earthhnk net] Thursday, September 16, 2004 10 59 AM gordonk@starband net FBETZ@aol com, BIGBASSBILBY@Earthhnk net, jlblack830@myexcelcom, SONIABOUT@sbcglobal net, TJBRADY@totahnk net, magbernfla@peoplepc com, DABUSA@YAHOOcom, GMACCOACH@aolcom, CDAVIS@nnlcom, DUBEC@ca Inter net, DEERFL YNN@aol com, HEUREUXL@aol com, GERIL67@aol com, YGOMEZ@bellsouth net, DON@abc ca, KEJEH@msn com, NIMREDY@aol com, KUCHIBHOTLA KRISHNA@venzon net, THOMASK@angklrcom, NICOLE LHEUREUX@fd ulaval ca, ICIMIKE@aolcom, LLEVIT@comcast net, BAYWAY408 @msn com, MANOLlAS2@aol com, MURREYMAR@aol com, DIANE MARSTERS@palmasdelmar com, RMICHALEKPHS@Yls us, MIKHAILADEL@aol com, DUSIU@aol com, DIARUZ@aol com, BOB RYAN@expresspersonnel com, SABELS@prodlgy net, GSCHLlESINGER@cludad com ar, KSEILER1 @knology net, NIZAE@aol com, LEEBEASMITH@webtvnet, SUSANWATT@canadacom, WATTSUPLUCY@Earthhnk net, RIDEA@aol com, Reynolds, Mike, Clearwater POint 7 Condominium Office Re 850 Bayway Blvd From Sent To Cc: Dr Gordon and Nancy Klockow, My husband and I also own a unlt ln the Commodore bUlldlng at Clearwater POlnt # 7 We feel you have some very valld concerns and we share your thoughts As you mentloned, we (Clearwater POlnt 7) do not own the Vlews, but lf we allow thlS proJect to contlnue, what wlll be next? I thlnk we all know the answer to that questlon Progress and change 1S good as long as lt doesn't lmpose problems and effect other people and the~r rlghts We certalnly oppose any proJect that would do otherwlse It lS our hope we all wlll Thank you for your support speak out and protect our vested lnterest > Sent wednesday, September 15, 2004 9 32 PM SubJect Re 850 Bayway Blvd i[ OJ~(C~~~~ '\ lfU SEP 2 0 20M I 0' Faye & Vern B~lby Greenwood, Ind~ana bllby94@yahoo com PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF CLEARWATER > Dear Bernle and all, > > please clar~fy several ~ssues for Nancy and me I see Mr Mlke Reynolds' > name llsted ln one locatlon as Senlor ProJect Planner- assUffilng that he lS > worklng for the bUllder of thlS proJect and on hlS return address, I note > that he has an address wlth the Clearwater Clty Government As the ~ncomlng > chlef law enforcement offlcer of our county here ~n Indlana, a sltuatlon > such as thlS would be construed as a confl~ct of lnterest and I would have > to recuse myself from Slttlng In Judgement on the plann~ng commlss~on > > I am further bothered by the loss of r~ght-of-way to the street and am > concerned that thlS loss would compromlse securlty and access of emergency > vehlcles to the pOlnt beyond thlS structure I am furthered concerned lf > there lS sufflclent flre and emergency access to the bu~ldlng ltself glven > the the added helght and loss of access from the street > > Whlle we may not "own the vlew", we are certalnly entltled to malntaln 1 the > lack of nOlse at thls end of the lsland and we are certalnly entltled to > malntaln the level of secur1ty and amb1ence for whlch we have all labored so > hard to develop > > I would apprec~ate clarlf1catlon of any of the po~nts that I have ralsed > from anyone pr10r to my sesndlng a letter of obJectlon to thlS proJect > Thank you for your help. > > Dr. Gordon and Nancy Klockow > Rensselaer, Indlana > Yacht House *405 > ----- Orlglnal Message > From "Clearwater POlnt 7 CondomlnlUffi Offlce~ <> Sent: Saturday, September 11, 2004 9 30 AM > SubJect: 850 Bayway Blvd > > > > We are sendlng all res1dents the followlng letter we hope each of you > > f11e and obJect10n to thls proJect. Meet1ng on 9/21 lS only flrst step for > > us to oppose thls proJect. > > > > Bernle > > > > Re 850 Bayway/Chart House Locatlon > > > > On Thursday, September 9th Pat Ruzzo, SW1m Club Pres1dent, Lee Connor (CP8 > > Board Member), Bern1e & Magg1e Brennan met wlth Mlchael Reynolds, Senlor > > planner for thls Clearwater Beach proJect We are currently havlng them > > provlde us wlth cop1es of data regardlng thls proJect. There w111 be > > further dlScusslon next week. > > > > Our dlscover~es yesterday seem to lndlcate that all the formallt~es and > > paperwork has been properly done and approved by Clearwater offlclals > > The scheduled meet~ng for September 21st, although open to the publlc, > > leaves us Ilttle room to organ~ze or present arguments that may change > > thelr deClSlons to approve thls proJect called &*147,Almlnar &*148, > > > > > > > > > > Everyone at Clearwater P01nt was mal led notlflcat~on, and they sald a clt1zen response lS the most recognlzed ldea of obJectlon that they can measure, other than presentatlons that wlll be made o~tne 2~S~WlLB thls In m1nd, we are asklng each res1dent to wr1te Mr I Re~Olrds~ii€tt~FO ~ (or e-ma~l) at the follow1ng address: II ) Its '0::Y ~ ~ W l!;; Mlchael Reynolds 'J~ll< Clty of Clearwater I SEP 2 0 100 S Myrtle Ave. ,I - 2004 P O. Box 4748 It, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 Mlke reynolds@myclearwater com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to 15 I PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES You need to VOlce your obJectlons on 1ssues other than &#147~CYs@F~fEARWATER v1ew&#148, whlch they feel lS not a good enough reason because It&#146,s not yours > > lose Other grounds for obJectlon are > > &#149, The approval of the developers request to add 14&#146, to the > > eXlstlng > > helght (from 35&#146, to 49&#146,) mak1ng the bU11dlng the only waters > > edge bUlldlng > > on Clearwater P01nt WhlCh exceeds 35 feet > > &#149, Allowlng the developer to reduce the requ1red 15&#146, setback to > > 6 03&#146, > > &#149, Open1ng the door to slmllar varlatlons from the baslc code, Wh1Ch 2 > > w~ll certalnly detract 1_~ffi the fundamental character of Ie nelghborhood > > &#149, The developer&#146,s proJect does not 1nclude a pool whlch means > > our > > facll1t1es wlll be vulnerable and requlre more securlty > > > > YOU NEED TO TAKE ACTION IMMEDIATELY IF MR REYNOLDS IS TO RECEIVE THIS > > BEFORE SEPTEMBER 21, 2004 > > > PLAI\H>JING & DEVELOPMENT SEfWICES L CITY OF CLEARWATER 3 Page 1 of 2 Reynolds, Mike From: CLIFFORD ALBRECHT [cllffalb@msn com] Sent Monday, September 20,2004905 AM To: Reynolds, Mike Subject. 850 Bayway Blvd Clifford C Albrecht \ \ I G Q DEVELOPMEN1 \ \ PLANN\N 01 SERVICES \ TY OF CLEr,qWATER \ ~- ~ ._--~-- 830 S Gulfvlew Blvd No 705 Clearwater, FL 33767 Tel (727) 441-1591 September 20, 2004 Michael Reynolds City of Clearwater PO Box 4748 100 S myrtle Ave Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 Dear Mr Reynolds I am wntlng In regard to the proposed Almlnar redevelopment project at 850 Bayway Blvd Although I am generally In favor of the Improvement of properties on the south beach, I feel this proJect mtroduces several Impediments to the eXisting ambIance and lifestyle enJoyed by the residents of the Clearwater POint community The pOints I am In contention with Include the Increase In bUilding height, the decrease In setback, and the Increase In bUilding mass The addition of 14 teet to the height of the bUilding will put It outSide of the norm for the rest of the water front properties on Clearwater pomt It will also Interfere with the water view of several Units In neIghbOring condominiums, thus decreaSing their value and causing a personal hardship to their owners As to the reduction In set back, IS It not enough that the new condos on Bayway have encroached on the open space adjacent to the roadway? To further encroach on our open enVIronment and not allow room for some green on thiS Island IS unconscionable Much effort has been expended to keep the "POInt" area of the south beach open and green and the reSidents would like to keep It that way The Increase In mass of the proposed project Will add to the cement denSity on the south beach It Will decrease the water access, the dayilght and even the breezes we receive As] mentioned In my opening remarks, I am not against Improvements however, changing property profiles In such a way that Impact the lives and Investments of neighbors IS not an acceptable way of achieVing that end Thank you for your attentIon to these Issues Sincerely, 9/20/2004 Page 2 of 2 Clifford Albrecht !'rl)~(C~~~~ I~/'I i lfl} SEP 202004 I I I I i I J . -----, '" I 0\ PLANr>JING & DEVELOPMENI S ER\lICES CITY OF CLEARWATER 9/20/2004 Page 1 of 1 From: Sent: To Subject: Importance Mccartlan@aol com Saturday, September 18. 2004 3 57 PM Reynolds, Mike [BULK] Unlt#8 Low SEP 2 0 2004 Reynolds, Mike Mr Reynolds My name IS Richard McCarthy and I live at 830 So Gultvlew Blvd, Apt 502 I strongly object to the proposed Project at 850 Bayway Blvd because this directly has a negative Impact on the value of my property This IS a residential section and IS peaceful but based on the plans It appears that these units will generate people comrng and gOing constantly and Increase the nOise level In addition thIs would result rn an added expense to me for pool security and tremendously Increase traffic congestion In the pornt Finally why should thIs developer be allowed to variate from the building code which wIll detract from the fundamental character of the neighborhood PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SE R"JICES CITY OF CLE,\RWATER Richard C McCarthy 830 So Gulfvlew Blvd Apt 502 Clearwater Beach, FL 33767 9/2012004 Page 1 of 1 Reynolds, Mike From: rand marsters [randmarsters@hotmall com] Sent. Tuesday. September 14, 2004 855 PM To' Reynolds, Mike Cc magbernfla ,- Subject: Fw Clearwater Beach ProJect! Chart House locallOn! called rO ~iEtlEW ~ SEP 2 0 2004 ___n Original Message __m From: rand marsters To: revnolds 1 PLANNING & DEVElOPMENT Cc cDOlnt7 SERVICES Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004836 PM rlTY OF CLEr\RWATER Su bJect: Fw Clearwater Beach ProjecV Chart House Locatlonl called &#14 Z,.Almlnar-&# 148 D\i \ , : m__ Original Message .--.- from: rand marsters To: revnolds@mvclearwatercom Cc: cpolnt7 @ knology net Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 1 00 PM Subject: Clearwater Beach ProJecU Chart House Locatlonl called &# 147, Alml nar &# 148 Dear Mr. MIchael Reynolds; City of Clearwater Office; Senior Planner for the Subject project Thank you for recelvrng thiS e- mall. We are Rand & Diane Marsters, owners of Condo apartment # 507 In the Commodore, ass Bayway Blvd Clearwater Beach, Fla. We have received notice from our Clearwater POint 7 Condo Office, regarding the Proposed constructIon of the above mentioned Subject Project In response to thiS Notice & the fact that we cannot attend the scheduled hearing ,Sept. 21st, we respectfuly submit herein our concerns to you. . We have objection to increaSing the Height from the eXIsting Code for Waters Edge BUIldings of 35 feet....We have objection to lessening the the BUilding set back Code of 15 feet........ It IS our concern that these proposed Changes/ VariatIons from the baSIC bUilding Code for Waters Edge BUildings not be approved; they are not acceptable. The Codes were set, With thiS very kind of future Project In mind. Any change to thIS BUIlding Code would set a precedent for continued compromise to the unique deSign character, flavor & feelrng we all expenence In thiS neighborhood, as well as real estate Value... ...If you approve rncreased height for waters edge property, It Will have an adverse effect on the deSign Intent of the Clearwater Beach Condo/ Lower level conceptual neighborhood & It's Real Estate Values . .Thank you for these cons I d erat 10 n s .." Ra nd & D la ne M a rste rs 9/20/2004 Page 1 of 1 PLANNING & OEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF CLE,..f1WATER My wife and I are residents of 851 Bayway Blvd. We believe the project scheduled for 850 Bayway Will become a real problem for us. The height of the bUilding is higher than anything else bUilt on our street for last couple of years Granting height variance IS shortsighted and will not help residential atmosphere we have. The developers wanted to build a taller building and resubmitted a shorter structure but it will still be an eyesore In our residential area. We are against such a project and are surprised how it could have gotten so far along without any notification to local residents. From: Maggle&Bernle [MAGBERNFLA@peoplepc com] Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2004910 AM To: Reynolds, Mike Cc: CLWPT7 Subject: 850 Bayway Blvd Project Ie ~~1 re Reynolds, Mike SEP 2 0 2004 Bernard and Maureen Brennan 851 Bayway#101 Clearwater, FI33767 9/20/2004 Sep 20 04 09:55a Barn' Watt 905 4r ~ 0566 p.l [Click here ;]nd type address] facsimile transmittal RECEIVED Frank (Chip) Gerlock SEP 2 0 2004 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 72..7 - 5&.2 - Lj<r(..~ To' Fax. From: Susan Watt Date: 9120/2004 Re: Objections to the redevelopment appllcatlon for 850 Bayway Blvd Case # FLD2004-04026 Pages 6 pages mcluding cover cc: o Urgent o For Review o Please Comment ED" Please Reply o Please Recycle . . . . . . . . . Please find attached my request for party status, the request for a delay for the heanng on Sept 2], and objections to the proposed project Would you please call me at 905 4039369 to verify that you have received this fax and that you WIll present it to the Development Review CommIttee Susan Watt Regards, ~~~ PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF CLEARWATER .. ................. ........ ............ II.. Sep 20 04 09:SSa BarnEC Watt 90S 4....'1 OS66 p.2 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT September 17,20041\ SERVICES CITY OF CLEARWATER Re: Case Number FLD2004-04026 '9E(c~~\';7[E D~I SEP 2 0 2004 I I I I RECEIVED 1566 Spring Road Mississauga, ON L51 1 N3 SEP 2 0 2004 PLANNING DePARTMENT CIlV OF CLEARWATER The Development Review Committee must reject thIs proposaJ for 850 Bayway Blvd. Clearwater Point is a resIdential area. Many owners live here full-time; others are seasonal. But we are a community of neighbors, some of whom have known each other for more than 20 years. We all bought our homes trusting that the city would enforce its own zoning gmdelines, especially when not doing so would have such a negatIve impact on us. No valid reason has been shown for the Development Review Committee to approve the proposed development Indeed., the city must not make the kinds of decisions that adversely affect so many of its CItizens. As resHrents of Clearwater Point, we are entitled to the quiet enjoyment of our properties. We are also entItled to have the CIty protect our property values. The purpose of this letter is three-fold' to request 'party status' as a resident WIthin 200' of the proposed project. See (A) below. to request a delay for this hearing for the reasons listed below (B); and to object to the project on the grounds hsted below (C). A) PARTY STATUS Mr. Frank Gerlock, Development Review Manager, assured me in our telephone conversation on Fnday September 17,2004, that my request in writing for party status will be recognized, As an owner of a property which IS within 200 feet of the subject redevelopment, I am hereby requesting such party status. B) HEARING DELA Y This heanng should be delayed for the following reasons: I) As the Development Review Committee generally approves the appltcattons it reVIews. those who are opposed to the proposal must have a chance to be heard 2) In thlS mstance, not enough time was given to prepare for thIS meeting. Far too many residents of Clearwater Point are sbll unaware Oflt. and many are unable to attend on such short notice. To make a decision that adversely affects hundreds and hundreds of reSIdents whlle not aHowmg them time to attend the meetmg IS unreasonable Sep 20 04 09:S6a Barnp" Watt 905 4("'-1 0566 10.3 3) The state of Flonda encouraged people to leave the area because of the threat of the hurricanes Many residents left, are still away, and therefore haven't seen their recent mail ~ which Includes the notice of tlus meeting. 4) In the business days prior to the meetmg, Mr Michael Reynolds AlCP Planner III, the author of the report which has recommended approval, had to attend a funeral of a family member, and was thereby unavailable for communicatIon with the public. C) OBJECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT The proposed project must be denied because the planning committee's report is flawed. First. The property in question is not simply a hotel as stated in the report. In fact, Chart House SuitesfCleanvater Bay is presently a Time Share [Resort Condominiums International (ReI) #4316] So the proposed 'residential' units could really be Time Share units - an entirely different proposition. Second The report states that "the proposed front setback and building height increase are necessary in order to fit the proposed" application Instead, the proposal itself should fit existing zoning codes. Third. (Please see attached -- the Clearwater Planning Department Staff Report: Case Number, FLD2004-04026; Agenda Item, F; Owner, Decade Properties, pages 3 and 4) On page 3 of the report under 'COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA (Sections 2-'803), numbers 1,2,4,5,6, 7, although listed as 'consistent' are, in fact, 'inconsistent' . For number 1. A practical development plan wluch doesn't deviate from the use, intensity and development standards could easIly be designed; For number 2 The development will reduce the fair market value of the abutting and adj aceDt propertLes; For number 4. The use or mix of uses is not compatible with adjacent land use. For number 5. The development will not upgrade the immediate vlCtnrty; it will detract from the immediate vicmity For number 6 The deSign (including the variances) does not create.a=form...ana::fill1ctiol? iliat--~ enhances; indeed, Jt depreciates the IrnmedJate vieirO ) ~ ~ I ~ ~ 0!/ ~ 0 I I~< U U SEP 2 0 2004 1 I PLANr'>JING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF CLEARWATER Sep 20 04 09:56a Barn' Watt 905 .."3 0566 p.4 For number 7. FlexIbIlIty m regard to lot width, required setbacks, and height are not justdied because they will not benefit the commumty character and immedIate vlcmity of the parcel proposed. On page 4 of the report under 'COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS (Section 3-913), nwnbers 1,2,5, and 6 although listed as 'consistent' are, in fact, 'mconslstent' For number 1. The development of the land Will not be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage and character of the adjacent properties. (Every shoreline bUIldmg In Clearwater Point complies with the 35 foot standard) For number 2. The development will significantly impair the value of much of the adjacent land and bUlldmgs. (TIus decrease in value for surrounding propertIes IS self-evIdent.) For number 5 The development is inconsistent with the commumty character of the munedIate VICInity. (All water's edge propertIes along Bayway Blvd. - mcluding the brand new townhouses - comply with the 35 foot standard) For number 6 The design of the proposed development does not minimize adverse effects, mcludmg visual, acoustic and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. Therefore, on page 4 of the report under 'Bases for Approval' 1 The proposal does not comply WIth the fleXIble Development critena as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment project per SectIon 2-803 C. 2 The proposal is not in compliance with other standards In the Code mcludmg the General ApplicabIlity Criteria per Sectlon 3-913 3 The development is not compatible with the surrounding area. Indeed, it WIll be the ooly water's edge bUIldmg that will be over the legal 35 foot allowance on Clearwater Point, Devon Dr., Brightwater Dr and Bayslde Dr. all of whIch present the view for all boat traffic going to Clearwater Manna It Will loom above all other shore propertIes. In conclusion, the Development Review CommIttee must deny tlus request for vanances for the aforementioned reasons To anow a developer to explOIt an opportunity at the expense of hundreds of Clearwater Point's reSIdents - most of whom are seruar CItIzens who have been law- abIding taxpayers for years and years - would be unconscIOnable Yours truly, , _ _ i icSJ [E (C [E ~ ~ [E s~:: ';;a~L~5~d, ';;'~aler Poml ' i f~ SEP 2 0 alM PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF CLEARWATER Sep 20 04 09:56a ~ ~~~W~ 05~1 SEP 2 0 2004 1 I I Barnp" Watt I 905 APPEl\JDIX 1 P~.GE ~ Pl.ANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES S "1 SO fiT" OF CLEARWATER eetlonlll 2- 3.~....c__ CODolltent JntQruJi~tent X ...-..........-... --....... The dcvelopmcnl or redevdopment uf the pared pl'oposed for development is o1herwise impractical withoul deviations from LIte use, inteosi and dew] meot standards ~ ~ The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive InfiU Redevelopment Project will not reduce the fair market value of abuttiD TO erties The uses within the Comprehensive Infit1 Redevelopment Project are otherwise mitted in the Cit of Clearwatet. , 4:' The use or mix of uses within the Compreben91ve lnfin Redevelopment Pr "eet is co!!!p.!.tib!~th ~~~ uses The development of the parcel proposed for devefopment. as a CompreheDsive InfiU Redevelopment Projed will upgrade the immediate Yicini~f the .E!l!.c;el~R~ for d meat, The design of the proposed Comprebeosiw InfiU Redevelopment Project createS a form and function that enhancc9 the community cbaracte.- of the immediate vicinity of the plUcel proposed for .....:.._~ j.evelopment and the City of Clearwater as a whoJe ; .' 7, . Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, hetght and off- street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vianity of the parcel proposed for development and the C of Clearwater as a whole Adequate off-street patlcins: in the immediate vicinity accordmg to 1M shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity oCthe parcel proposed for devel~meut 1 3 "- '5 6 -- 8. x x x x x x x 9051I~ ~[E~\4[E';:-06 \! SEP 2 0 2004 s.c_L'13 !,LANNIN~ & ?~\'ELOPMENT ! : rl n-~~Iiif!nJl' tclD.llIlt1De Development of the land will be in harmotly with the st8Ie;-bulk; X - - coverag~ density and character of adjacent properties. ,_ Development will not hinder or discourage development and use of ad' acent land and buildings or SJgci&antly impair the value thereof. Development will not adversely aft'ect the health or safety of persons resid' or workin in the Dei oed. Develo is des' to minimize traffic co 00. Development is consistent with the conununity c:hamcter of the immediate vicmi . Deaip. of the propoled development minimizes advems effects. includ.108 viSU8~ acoustic and ol&ctory and hours of operation im s on aeJOacent . PAGE 4 Sep 20 04 OS:5Sa Barnp'1 Watt APPENDIX 1 cant 'K 1 ' "- ' 2' -I , 3 4. 5. I 6, x x x X x SIJMMARY AND QCOMMJ'.NDA110N: The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meeting on August 18. 2004. The Planning Department recommonc19 APPROVAL of the F1eJa'bl.e Development application of a mixed use development for 13 multi-family residential units and ailt hotel units with a reduction of the front (south) setback. along Bayway Boulevard. from 15 feet to 6 03 feet (to pavement), and a buildins beight increue ftom 3S feet to 49 feet from base flood elevation (plus roof appurtenances), as a Comprebonsive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sectio1J 2-803.C with tbe foUowmg hues ami eondit1ons' 1f' Bases for Awfoval: 1 Tho proposal complies with the FleKible DeoIelopmeot criteria as a Comprehenstve InfiD lledevelopmellt Project pet SectaOD 2-803.C 2 The proposal is in compliance with other standa:rds in the Code jncludklg the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3w913 3 The development is compatl"ble with the surrounding area and will eabance other redevelopment efforts Conditions of Approval. 1 That the final design and color of the building be COJlS1SteDt with the conceptual elevatiObS submitted to, or as modified by, the COO, 2 That all Fire Department requirements be md prior to the iSSUBDCC of any budding permits,. 3 That the National Fire Protection Association (NFP A) 303 standards for ~ and boatyards" be met to the satis6lction of the Fire Department prior to the 1!lsuance of any building permits, 4. That aD Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the isSU8I1Ce of any building permt$; 5. That dumpster service with the City of Clearwater be amnged prier to budding permit lssuanc:e, 6. That the mgation plan sheet be revised to the satisfaction of City Ptannins Statt: prior to any building permit iasuanc:e: 7. That all storm water, water, and sev.rer design standards of the Engineering Department be met prior building permit issuance, StaffRepOft - CoInmMlty Developmc:nt BoaId - SL-pt:elI1hv 21. 2004 . Case FLD2004-04026 - Paso 4 - - -.... .........-.-. -.....-- rr--u.- ..,r-i" " . nt. . V't...J.J ~dd~ u~r~-J~EM~Pdl~ln~tl" wn~~ Dear Mr Reynolds, - - ~-_~J J.............. J i-,. L 1 r _ ............ j I ~ II I _.I I '" lie \\v) \~_I\ \J tS' U :: I L--J '-../ -- U I : I L-..,..' I l1:b I '\ ' ! \J=-' \ - SEP 2 0 2004 ' i \1 U I '\ PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT I SERVICES \ CITY OF CLEARWATER Michael Reynolds C/Clty of Clearwater 100 S Myrtle Ave Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758 We, Krystyna Rondo and Zblgmew Sikora own the umt 805 located at 855 Bay-way Blvd We have recently been Informed that there IS a proposed project to develop a property at 850 Bay-way Blvd I strongly object to thiS prOJect, as It would severely Impact the value of my property From the looks of the plans, It appears that thiS would be a very large rental property, with the units constantly changing hands We purchased a reSIdentIal Unit, In a residential area, for the sole purpose of ItS peace and solitude Constructing a large motel In our area would create a nOIse problem, would limit emergency access, and would compromise security, which In turn would directly diminish the value of our property In addition, we would like to protest thiS constructIOn based on the violations ofthe zomng board's rules and regulations From what we understand, thIS proposed construction project would violate the current rules by permItting the developer to erect hIS project at a height of 14 feet plus a roof over the current regulations Regulations are enacted for a purpose, and If the zOning board WIll be arbltranly varymg from the rules that they themselves created, then there does not appear to be any reason for these rules whatsoever Why Will thiS developer be arbltranly permitted to erect thiS property In vanance to the codes? How WIll thiS benefit anyone but himself? We also understand that thiS developer has requested a variance not only on the height restnctlon, but also on the proximity of the property to the pavement Our neighborhood, as mentioned before, has always been reSidential, and plaCing large structures SIX feet from the pavement would SIgnificantly reduce ItS suburban charm, and thus, Significantly reduce the value of our property It'S very hard to understand why anyone would be permitted to SImply Ignore the rules and regulatIons that have been for many years a main part of the enjoyment we have In our property For all of these reasons, we would hke to reiterate, as an apartment owners, and loyal taxpayers, who would be strongly and negatively Impacted by thiS project We strongly object to the grantmg of thiS development SIncerely Yours, Krystyna Rondo and Zblgmew Sikora ~I ~~O , r 7~ifD ~-'",-"'/~ Mr & Mrs A J Ildcqua 855 Bayway Blvd, Umt 208 Cledrwater Beach, FL 33767 September 17,2004 --~ -- - ~~ ~~ Mr Nhchael Reynolds City of Clearwater 100 S Myrtle Avenue POBox 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 lE (C Ir- ~~' ;'/ ; ,- l~ \\'1 ,;=::: , LS \) 1'-- ( : ~ I I ' SEP 2 0 2004 i; L/ i L.-/ Dear Mr Reynolds PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF CLE/\RWA TER My name IS Anthony Ilacqud and I lIve with my wife at 855 Bayway Blvd, UnIt 208, on Cle8.rnlater Beach We wish to expre5s our reservations and ObjectIOns to the proposed bUlldlllg project at 850 Bayway Blvd Our area is not 5et up to have "overmght accommodatIons" We are a re5IdentIal area and thiS structure would not be beneficIal to the resIdents of Clearwater Pomt It would brmg more traffic and potentldl parkmg problems - especially dunng spnng break ~ to our locatIOn and over time thiS would <to ultimately effect the value of our property We also want to pomt out that there have been many condomInmms (valued at $750,000+) bUIlt along the water Side of Bayway Blvd In the past several years and none have gone over four 5tofles How does th1S project warrant two vanances? Why IS the CIty allowmg thl5 exceptIOn - especIally m such a residentIal area? If you allow thiS project to go through, you will be settmg a precedent, and not a good one, whlch would allow any builder to come m and do what they want m the Clearwater POlOt area It wIll alter the character of our neighborhood and forever change It Another matter IS the fact that there will be no pool lO thiS development We hdve three pools and m3mtalll a beach area These areas are for tht. use of Clearwater Pomt residents We will need more secunty for ~ hours to mamtam our property Is thl~ somethmg we should have to worry about? NO!!! ThiS project WIll m no way enhance Clearwater Pomt, It wlII only take away from it We like thmgs the way they are A WIse person once Said, "If 1t am't broke, don't fix 1t" That '5 how we feel about thiS proJ eet Cordl~lly /t / /C-I ~~r-- ,,6' Ilacqu/' Jx-p t. I Cfl ;Z CJ c; L,AN - I L I .... ) SER C " ~ CITY OF C E '1\'1;\ TER _.~ ur~ ~ !J~-a ~ L;;.,--e td- ~ ~/ .4 ,I ,M . ~ ~ ,~~ 6/ (j / ~ 7 ~- w--e-- ~ 0-11-~ -;& It J C oLf- g:7'{)6~~/- ~ ~~,(JV ~r ~ JJ--C.f If-1/L- ~~/1 ~ - -~a- ~Jy _ -.u UJ-<~ ~~~ ~~ vv~~ << ~ ,~{ , c'I'-rY~~L.-'Yc.5";~ - '. L--f?'-tA..-- Vf.,-Lc~ ~ ~V1A d-. ./V' Cv~~ ;:::G ?tv- ,/ t A~r--0~'- 'rfi-~ ~r~~/c ~ JLL.~a(/~ LA./~ ~ ~f {P-L-VL yj-- /YL-l--'7r -~~~-& - /L-vl_L fu-I 7-0'-L-L-/L- Oz._c.:iL, (L-~d ~ ~ ~~U}--- ~ })c-> ~ jd-ALGr3 /L.U---€... cJ__^_L ~.L;;;:: /V:-L- _~ ~ / C?'-U-4L~ ~.<L #tvLe..-- ~ &J ~ L C/)?Lt- AJ~ 't! !~ S~-p r c- niB it tiS-; .;2 De 1/ i~~(C~~wLEl i lrul SEP 20 aIl4 : PLAt'-INING & CEVELOPME SE RIJICES r;I rv 0,- CL:: I.... rEr 'I) ""-J , IL'..{'I.:"L Illf,y,Vf;L,;j ~ Q...TY (,;;'; Cc tiR/L....) J1 r (. JL I'-A") S ''OJ '111.."7 G,s I~ \.'.: Dux. '-I J "-I d: C-..._t'J4i'C ,-J'::J'IC'--} It~ 3::375r - Lrjl/~F- - ~~ ~-----~ - - - ~...........--- ::;. ,"!. iJ/L S 1/_ ' f'N1 Y i't/'j'-/,"J} IE / ~ /iY U VyvC / Y}::.) cc, ri.--y /J.l .Ii ~/? :!;'IOs, ,VT Or &'5-; bl1-t' vJ ,-'(,y 6vY'? UrYt 7 S~ 0, I 1-7 AI ,j t ,~ i.. C-,jro/rc,j' .r') 0 rL-VPVs.<:-a //1....)::...,(;,07' bc(:,,') />} ,/JotS /7 <..V,?:j.e..C /" 7 ;:'J<.r! /'1 /\ <G Lc. / v' ,:'1) /)7 ,,? 5'.0 zYJI-(" v')~'/ /-1,,',) s t.-(-41L /"1 iV(_,;'::' r/L 0 /Y) - -' ') / ~/'-' f.) 0. L 0' ,y b Cc -',,", /?v'...-lr 7:k1'/U y /lrLe" ~, .r <1.)1.--1 (AI f.-, ,/J c cO ~d';; '-.J ;--;., ::::~d 1LV S'l( /6..1/ ,T/?-,-",,-, /Ht: ?~1/Jrl)-d//r- .c.- U/( -:Iv"" d C...~)~.J \.!~'" ,') ./ r -l ,0<) <.> ~J I /L1.: /-1,- L.- C; r. :,. ;- /S ~ r G c/-:' J::)I.-<-C, ;;, -;4-<:; 6xrS-,--"Y L, tude_I, HI.-L.(.ll.V 3..> / r/Cf' /)::. "/J/c ;; GS7/(..( c-{{ i:nU." ro>L. 301LDr-"l/ 6.5 tlJN/) \-(<- rl-l4 7JcI~~SL()P0L.J /-}r 6,..n:l $ilVv,)J'J,/ /-;12...(] 6(::;0 ;:'JCLV v J .-....? .1.../9' -L' ,7'-"1 a J J '!", tr:-, ill I,,; ,:. /':),:"t~ ,t.Jot (" -/ (,.) crl/lf)/((:,- "? ~'--VI " ~'\." .:!...,t; FGC-[ HVO /,1-'-' Vv-''- ~ r-;(,......v .. -'--F-; (~_( t" ~J(; VeLDa..;!' c. (}..) IS"" --..\ 71'/ f{j ;- u".J{\,v ,,,7.4..-.... Al C. '1-'1./ \l 0 ;::J /.. L y-..,/ ~ __...i -J ~ .u', C;/ iU (-'> /1 d~ r / )/!.J~ Lc.. V (c, vlJ t"J/I!/L.. ....1 y"V.J (:)1 " -l/l........{,.1 ,'" ) 01 \fl r/ 1..; 1)7 -'-1'1 ,i L .I( J S, -TlN (.., t....' u"-:V~>. c-? ) r>7o..j 1'/_/. -3 <~,v') A),y'O rv)yi;.&w P c- if; L / I'vW7 -' C-"'1,JJ.YlL?lS- /-'V!...!: L,)"I/ /...O!- '"-'1"/0 ,-~J, L.~ .J.:;- ;-,Q.,? cr I' 77~/iS Cp"/rt,v-,i:Jd-('7,cL, 1::-1 /,N~ ,'VL( It hi 0 YI..-E"I ullO <-..J A~.L...v ?<--/JC-J '7 ./_, , /"> U L,tl,-''': .;:, J //V '" -,- /,y/J,F '-/C1v' '~C~ 0i"'J $( oc,.t. -17-/0 AC.s:106.......-;- -/" OJ '"Ii--J.L I ~/c. ~<5 1-. ----,r C '- C::?'/Lv" ?;- c;,.- ?c::UJ ~....._l~:;:.t r'" ,j./ l/;- P1-_C)CA--" c; --;;-r/, --' (...0 tl ...; -; 1. e'F /r/I ',-,j Qu ,j.>.'rl ,/,,) <",")(...1 1.. v -7 / <.! I GHG -13 ~'&v t',.D jS) / .-<.-'! 3(jdr I..--y J< iO' ~ I":; (. .I)' ,1'- /-jkc- 'i <.0 ~"7 I'>''':} 6/ /..; ;-;")1<-- ",~<\1S~Y I...AJ { 15r/f!_< r u ?, c: m4( V /? 'd ~ S./,&iI>>C'L ,-: ~~) /Z6/J /)."'-or \....v (w c.'IL rV I:!:c,-";) '2G.">'7//(, u ---Y, I _{ r:J,> /j Ch.h t. FE//!/ Vuf-~ /-"I/~{ T ~/<.,t rl6, _Y..., 0(..' ~OJ </ -;- tv[. i/Xi Li.Jt;-1' C.lr UJL .........-).... ...,/.? h ~ t "~(.,"" (Jl..-" f ,-!rJD c...,>';),/,YJj Lr-)-y'O'-'2-"',....J>VfJ /--ri'~J /)vo I'\.JJ4Y /rIS- \//J ,1...[,:; /\/.... .;'-;J;. I--I/J "'.;:; Be ..g.) G<-."i ,-vr <O'..{~ ,:) (,.":;1',,,' L;'J ,L ~.JQ......"~~;;- /'-' V",_' /->- //7'4/ r/-!......-(/S U-l.;;')r-.l(~.s. / rV,-,r At...u_'.../,J,}o ? ..., l - ,. _'- ~ c....W<..l r"-)/f.....<_Y'I- YIA6 L~ 0 7~f((x ;-7LI"IL<-' /,yd LJ '00;/) JT'-/ /:/ VO .s,.....ZL v', r~J j-;J/I"7 ~....I CJr IV.... -'L S, f rJ c.;;;;: /Ll.! L- '-j ---) I" ) ,(1 ,_h.{, Ns' iY7,<lt:. (.JJ....v/l ~ Ss/ 2:>,1) ---( v') II <1 (J N t-r go&"' 8 ~3 n / eel; H. .:....j.-=l-;- C"'_ /" 1.-,) /4- Dr' , - - r { I..... \~~ / 1-:'- 1 r~ i )) c \\0 ~ L, \:.,' L- IlL" ,------- L ilJ' ~l 11 I U SEP 2 0 21104 jl.=./. PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CllY OF CLEARWATER Mlchael Reynolds C/Clty of Clearvvater 100 S Myrtle Avenue Box 4748 Clearwater, Fl 33758-4748 Mr Reynolds My name IS Kalhe Sldens and I hve at 851 Bayway Blvd Apt 805 WIth my husband Arty We strongly object to the proposed project at 850 Bayway Blvd, as presented to your board Based on the plans It appears that thIS will be a mIxed used project of rental and hotel umts We beheve your department IS not lookmg to protect the aesthetics of Clearwater Pomt and the Beach communIty At pre~ent there are no bmldmgs on Bayway Blvd whIch front on the canal that are over four stones This developer 1S requestmg from your department a vanances that are not m the best mterest of Clearwater Pomt and Beach CommunIty He IS requestmg a vanance to have rus setback reqmrements reduced by 9 feet to the pavement, and requestmg a vanance for a bmldmg he1ght mcrease by 14 feet plus appurtenances ThIS Wtll set a precedence for future development that wtll destroy the mtegnty and beauty of the area The CIty, I belIeve has set a reasonable standard and all developments should abIde to WIth no exceptIOns, otherw1se why set standards In wntl g thI5 letter I am cont~5tt thIS actIOn \1 .<' I 1 [Jic.1 ur j--/' / / ~/ J L Kallte SI ens 'v 851 Bayway Blvd Apt 807 Clearwater Beach, Fl33767 . -- ~ - --~- -r MIchael Reynolds CIClty of Clearwater Box 4748 100 S Myrtle Ave Clearwater, FI 33758-4748 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES erN OF CLEARWATER September 14,2004 Mr. Reynolds My name IS Sam Meo and I hve at 851 Bayway Blvd Apt. 606. I strongly object to the proposed project at 850 Bayway Blvd, because tlus dIrectly has a negatIve impact on the value of my property Based on the plans, 1t appears that these units wIll be rental umts Wlth people commg and going constantly. Who IS gomg to buy my urnt WIth the nOIse conung from across the street? Tlus happens now to a lesser extent With no one on the property for superviSIOn. Place a larger structure on tlus pIece of land and the problem becomes greater. There are no motels on this end of Bayway Blvd ThIS is a residenttal sectIOn and has been peaceful for many years. This brmgs me to another point I believe your department has not been lookmg out for the residents of Clearwater Point which has a large tax base and voting block. I feel your department has bent over backwards for the developer in approvmg TWO variances so the developer can build the buIlding he wants and not what IS m the best interest of the residents of Clearwater Pomt and Clearwater Beach At present there are no buildmgs on Bayway that are over four stones. ThIS developer got from your department a vanance to go fourteen feet plus over roof code. He also got a vanance to have lus property six feet from the pavement. There has been a lot of building going on 1ll Clearwater Beach wIth condo uruts costmg $750,000+ None of these bUlldlllgS are over four stones Why should the C1ty allow this developer to be the exceptIOn? J C{M t /)JIu- Sam Mea 851 Bayway Blvd Apt 606 Clearwater Beach, FI 33767 I~ ~(C~~W~r( I I SEP 2 0 2004 i' [ I I PlP-NNING 1', r;-VElOpr.11 1\11 St::F1JI( '=) CITYOICl~ '. '-E'l Mlchael Reynolds CICHy of Clearwater 100 S Myrtle Ave Box 4748 Clearwater, FI 33758-4748 September 14,2004 Mr Reynolds My name 1S Jeanne Meo and I hve at 855 Bayway Blvd. Apt. 60 I I strongly object to the proposed project at 850 Bayway Blvd, because thIs dIrectly has a negatIve impact on the value of my property. Based on the plans, It appears that these uruts WIll be rental units WIth people commg and gomg constantly Who IS gomg to buy my urnt WIth the nOise coming from across the street? ThiS happens now to a lesser extent WIth no one on the property for supervIsion Place a larger structure on thts piece of land and the problem becomes greater There are no motels on thiS end of Bayway Blvd. ThIS is a resIdential sectIOn and has been peaceful for many years. This bnngs me to another pomt. I belIeve your department has not been lookmg out for the residents of Clearwater Pomt which has a large tax base and voting block I feel your department has bent over backwards for the developer III approving TWO vanances so the developer can bUIld the buildmg he wants and not what IS in the best mterest of the res1dents of Clearwater Pomt and Clearwater Beach. At present there are no buildmgs on Bayway that are over four stones Tlus developer got from your department a variance to go fourteen feet plus over roof code He also got a vanance to have rus property six feet from the pavement. There has been a lot of building gomg on m Clearwater Beach with condo units costmg $750,000+. None of these bmldmgs are over four stories Why should the C1ty allow this developer to be the exception? ct~))t.w Jeanne Meo 855 Bayway Blvd. Apt 601 Clearwater Beach, F133767 , O~~(G~~W~lW\: \ I n III SEP 2 0 20M ~: L ~ IU lL \ ~ I J I PLANNING & [~C:\'ELOPM[i'-lT SERVICtS CITY OF ClE.-ViWATi>- MIchael Reynolds CICIty of Clearwater Box 4748 100 S Myrtle Ave Clearwater, F133758-4748 September 14, 2004 Mr Reynolds My name IS Sam Mea Jf and I live at 855 Bayway Blvd Apt 601 I strongly object to the proposed project at 850 Bayway Blvd., because thIs directly has a negatIve Impact on the value of my property Based on the plans, It appears that these tullts will be rental umts With people commg and gomg constantly Who is gomg to buy my umt WIth the noise commg from across the street? This happens now to a lesser extent wIth no one on the property for supervision. Place a larger structure on this piece of land and the problem becomes greater There are no motels on this end of Bayway Blvd TIns IS a residential sectIon and has been peaceful for many years. TIns brings me to another point. I believe your department has not been lookmg out for the resIdents of Clearwater Point which has a large tax base and voting block. I feel your department has bent over backwards for the developer m approvmg TWO variances so the developer can build the bUlldmg he wants and not what is m the best interest of the reSIdents of Clearwater Point and Clearwater Beach. At present there are no bUlldmgs on Bayway that are over four stones. This developer got from your department a vanance to go fourteen feet plus over roof code He also got a variance to have his property SIX feet from the pavement There has been a lot of building gomg on lD Clearwater Beach with condo units costing $750,000+. None of these buildmgs are over four stones. Why should the CIty allow tlus developer to be the exceptIOn? g /Y~ JtT- Sam Meo Jr. 855 Bayway Blvd. Apt. 601 Clearwater Beach, FI 33767 Michalek 6875 Anglebluff Circle Dallas, Texas 75248 . -6)~(C~~~1~ r. II n 11 SEP 20 20M Ii U, IJ U1 l~ I I I PLA:-.JNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF CLE <\Q,'/A 1 ER September 14, 2004 Mr Michael Reynolds, Semor Planner City of Clearwater ~ POBox 4748 Clearwater, Flonda 33758-4748 RE Almmar Proposal Dear Mr Reynolds. As we are not able to attend the scheduled meetmg of September 21 st, 2004, concernmg the Alminar ( 850 Bayway Boulevard) and live on the Pomt at 855 Bayway Boulevard - Commodore 707, we are wntmg to VOIce our concerns regarding this submitted proposal HIstoncally, our city has had codes and regulatIons In place for proper commumty layout and enVIrons protectmg the current res1dents, thelr children, and generatlons to come W1th thiS legacy In mmd, the City: . should not grant varIances or waIvers to codes and regulations in place for special mterest indIviduals, groups, or developers, II should preserve and mamtam estabhshed structureslbUlldings heights and setbacks as per code WIthout exception; . should respect and foster the family and reSIdentIal character of the neighborhood, 1 e , a commuruty wlthm a commumty, and II should protect and enhance the value of eXlstmg propertIes, e g , additIOnal height, lessened setback from the street, blockage from the water, would result m a drop m value and economIC hardship for current tax payers Mr Reynolds, we trust that you wIll honor the umqueness of the POInt for years to come and not approve the Almmar Proposal szrelY, h( ~1ft~ RU~ Rudy) and Chnslme ( Coos) Michalek September 14,2004 I @~~~W~/( I n 1 r-;P 2 0 200d :' [ U L!/ I' PLANNING & Dt'\; 0' r- ;,,, ',n "-- U I i......t'lr SERviCE;:; CITY OF CLE - - vJJ\ TER 1 J ~---~~.......... Mr MIchael Reynolds, Semor Planner City of Clearwater 100 S Myrtle Ave. POBox 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 Re "Almmar", Proposed Development at 850 Bayway Dear Mr. Reynolds My name IS Tony Manolias My wife and I have a condomimum, number 504, at 851 Bayway Blvd, m Clearwater Beach The purpose of this commurucatIon IS to inform you and other Ctty Officials, that we strongly object to the subject development for the followmg reasons You are allowing a vanance to the height of the proposed bwldmg from 35ft to 49 ft, and another vanance to the front (south) setback from 15 ft to 6.03 ft. TIus will be the only waters edge building on Clearwater Pomt that does not follow the present zomng requIrements What IS the basiS of your decision? Do you belIeve m conformIty? You are allowing rental uruts, and motel umts, With people commg and gomg constantly We already have problems, such as noise With the eX1stmg motel umts. I have personally called the absentee management, and the Police regardmg this. The proposed development does not include a swnnming pool This Will reqUIre more secunty to patrol our three swimmmg pools Our property values will declIne, if the proposed development goes thru In summary You Ignore the Interests of the resIdents and voters of Clearwater Pomt. ,You do not seem to be concerned III mamtaming the beauty, and character of Clearwater Pomt You seem to have accommodated the Wishes of the Developer smcerelvf1fY~l~ 7YJ~- '-W;~ Tony and Mana Mandhas 851 Bayway Blvd, Apt 504 Clearwater, FI 33767 --------............... -~-- ~ 851 Bayv.ray Blvd #406 Clearwater, FL 33767 MIchael Reynolds CIty of Clearwater 100 S Myrtle Ave PO Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 "L I PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT I SERVICES ; CITY OF ClEI\RWATER Mr Reynolds It has recently come to my attentlOn that there I,', a proposed project at 850 Bayway Blvd that IS requestlllg sigmficant vanatton to the bUIldmg code I hve across the street from the proposed project and strenuously object to allowmg the suggested vanances for the followmg reasons . I beheve that It wIll dlmIm<;h the property value of my neIghborhood . Commercial property wIll be gammg a largcr foothold m a pnmanly resldenttal neIghborhood . NOlse whIch has always been a problem wIth that property wIll get worse . Street parkmg WIll potentIally become more congested . There are no bUlldmgs on the water over 4 stones and If we allow thIs vanance does It not open the door for more projects? . The setback vanance Will sIgmficantly change the appearance of the neIghborhood - a WIde open fnendly neighborhood wIll have a sore thumb shcklllg out - practically mto the street! . The CIty appears to be helpmg a property manager to develop a property with reduced amemttes whIch could result m theIr guests trespassmg on my aSSOCiatiOn's property to use our facIlIttes pools, hot tub, tenms courts, parkmg garage, etc If you do not ltve m our neighborhood, please consider walkmg through It at a Olce slow pace (on a weekend or aftcr work) Pretend for a moment that you do hve here and ask yourself If you would want thIS project to go forward [ vote no Please feel free to contact me at your conVCOlence at 727-278A421Ifyou have any questiOns Please leave a message (It IS my cell phone), I w111 return your call promptly I StnCXrely, i~- (Charc, \ Q(:b!6'f 1-- I,r--:\ ~ :10 dE J~~~~ rc:\ 'I ~ ~'L\ :;fU SEP202004ILJ': ----! ' PLA~, W,IG & ['~ ,IE LOPME NT SERVICES i__ __ Clrt OF CLE qll,t\TEf"l MIchael Reynolds CICIty of Clearwater 100 S Myrtle Avenue Box 4748 Clearwater, Fl 33758-4748 Mr Reynold" My name IS George Comomel and I hve at 851 Bayway Blvd Apt 807 wIth my wIfe Manlyn We strongly object to the propo~ed project at 850 Bayway Blvd, as presented to your board Based on the plans It appears that thIS will be a mIxed u~ed project of rental and hotel umts We beheve your department IS not lookmg to protect the aesthetIcs of Clearwater Pomt and the Beach commumty At present there are no bmldmgs on Bayway Blvd whIch front on the canal that are over four stones 11us developer IS requestmg from your department a vanances that are not III the be"t mterest of Clearwater Pomt and Beach Comrmuuty. He IS requestmg a vanance to have lus setback reqUirements reduced by 9 feet to the pavement, and requestmg a vanance for a bUlldmg heIght mcrease by 14 feet plus appurtenances ThIs W111 set a precedence for future development that will destroy the lOtegnty and beauty of the area The CIty, r beheve has set a reasonable standard and all developments '::ihould abIde to wtth no exceptIOns, othenVI'::ie why set standards In wntmg tills letter I am contestmg thIS at.1lon I \ '\/ r, () \ ....-~--.{ George Comnloel 851 Bayway Blvd Apt 807 Clearwater Beach, Fl 33767 fo MIChael Reynolds c/CJTY OF CLEARWATER 100 S Myrtle Ave Box4748 Clearwater, FI 33758-4748 'Lj' ~(C[E~w[E ~~"i, I~ SEP20~ llVi PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF CLEARWATER Mr Reynolds Our names are Bradley and Nlza Shaw and we live at 855 Bayway Blvd, UOlt #505 We are wntmg thiS letter under great depressed feelmgs We chose our property because It was NOT a rental bUlldmg It IS a resldentml bll1ldmg We live here 12 months out of the year It IS qUiet and yet all convemences are aVailable Just a short distance away Dunng the holidays Ie 4th of July, Labor Day, Memonal weekends, etc, our property RemainS qUIet and not mvaded by rental people who come and go and really have no Interest 10 us or in our area of property We are very concerned With your pOSition ill not protecting our area "Why have you approved the reductiOn of the setback"? " Why have you approved a bUlldmg that will exceed 35' (35 to 49')? What about our pools? Are you provldmg and paymg for the addition secunty Which will be reqUired? I hope so at the City'S expense Since you approved It""'''' Weare very dlsappomted m your disconcert With the reSidences of Clearwater Pomt And Clearwater Beach and why are these developers be ALLOWED an exceptiOn To the RULE""'" r TRUL Y hope you Will reconSider your posItion and stand behmd the Wishes of Clearwater Pomt reSidents Thank You Bradley & Nlza Shaw 855 Bayway Blvd, Unit 505 Clearwater Beach, Fl 33767 Sept 15, 2004 L? . II _, uJ.. o1../1.L- a..LCLU>-U.€ ~ 't.,n..... ?W:-I- tfA!.~.. 7'L--,-~....... )1vt. 1~v2 "L "'- ':..J r-. -" j/ e~ _I ..J)/L' r ,oC'c.><......--<.- - r d C' /J.;I fil J'J/.Jl ;,4 d..-<kJe:-p:f ~/ #4L /~<i.t~ 1 (JeCJ.M<cu-:G. t&-j.".t ~ ,b ~ rJ.L1'U~t-""4/{, I, '?-.2 -;;;0/1 /~~..v I 4: '1/ ~ ,? I /17/tc>cl~? -; I .R) ~.."../ Watkms, Sherry - ~ ~ ~~ ~=~~ ~ - ~ ~~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ - ............... ~~ -~~-~ - -.... -- ~ ~~ ...............~..........-....- - - -~~ - ~~- ~~~~=~- From Reynolds, Mike Sent Tuesday, September 21,2004 1044 AM To Watkins, Sherry Subject FW 850 Bayway/Chart House LocatIon ---\l Mike Reynolds, A\CP, Senior Planner City of Clearwater - 727 -562-4836 IT!lk~_ [~yn9Ids@!:DY.clearwater com -----Onglnal Message----- From: r1chard poulsen [mallto,poulsens@comcast net] Sent: Monday, September 20,20047 14 AM To: Reynolds, Mike Subject: 850 Bayway/Chart House Location Michael Reynolds City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Ave Clearwater, FI 33758-4748 Dear Mr Reynolds My name \s Richard poulsen and I have owned a condominium at 830 South Gulfvlew Blvd ever since construction In 1981 We are proud of our city and proud of Clearwater POint We pay our taxes and ask very little from our city In Ihe way of support There IS an Issue that must be addressed before any more vanances are granted to property developers The Issue IS Sidewalks There IS scarcely a street that has a conttnuous concrete sidewalk Businesses encroach on what little sidewalks exist and every new developer asks for waivers on setbacks I pccpDse that a plan be developed and released to the pubhc that Insures that the land be made available Immediately 10 layout and bUild sidewalks from Clearwater pOint to the Route 60 round-about, on both Gulfvlew and Bayway blvds Only when thiS plan IS completed should any vanances be considered Would you please express my views and concerns to our mayor and hiS councilors Yours truly, Richard poulsen Apt 506 830 S Gulfvtew Blvd Clearwater, FI , 33767 ;{6~~ 0'\ \U"~ SEP 2 I 2004 i \ PLANNlNG & OEVELOPMENl SERVICES I CITY OF CLEARWATER L__ 9/21/2004 page j ot L Watkins, Sherry From Reynolds, Mike Sent Tuesday, September 21, 2004 1045 AM To Watkins, Sherry Subject FW 850 Bayway/Chart House Location Mike Reynolds, AICP, Senior Planner City of Clearwater - 727-562-4836 mike rr;YIJQLc;!~@DJyclearwaler com -----~~. - ~ - ~- iln~~cC~~\t~ r"L:::-\)~ II --- ) c-- I, \\fU\ SEP 2 I ZOO4 l0 L I PLAt'INlt'jG & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF ClE' R'NATER - ----0 rI g I na I M essage----- From: Owen Lmford [malJto saJemcustomhomes@msn com) Sent' Tuesday, September 21, 20047 36 AM To: Reynolds, Mike Subject: 850 BaywayjChart House LocatIon - -~-------........--&"........---- Firstly, I would like to state that as a builder here In Michigan and as a homeowner m Clearwater Beach, I have concerns wIth vanances being permItted to allow development changes opposmg current zonmg restnctlons My biggest concern IS "where does thIs end?" We, m effect, pay for and elect our government officials and their administrations to represent us as well as others In this community I understand you have to represent all sides, whether It be developers or current citizens, but when you develop ordmances, the masses are supposed to follow your stnct cntena whether It be for a $100 shed or a $10 millIon high nse I doubt, very much, that granting vanances are m the best mterest of the current admmlstratlon, but It appears that the current administration will bend the rules and grant vanances for the developers economic needs Typically, vanances are granted for hardship cases and not for the pleasure of the builder's needs Furthermore, I would like to ask If the City Charter allows variances without prior approval from the local reSidents In my freid, I work very closely with many municipalities and the number one cnterlon for all the cities IS the wishes of the citizens most Impacted I also fmd It dlsconcertmg that the fIre marshal has, In fact, bought off on this plan You should have reviewed With him the constramts to the site In question Hopefully, their equipment IS able to accommodate a disaster m thiS bulldmg, but be aware that because of the heavy tou fist population here, the road narrows down to a one lane road when vehICles, traders, and semi trucks are parked on the road Will a fire truck be able to enter thiS area dUring heavily populated times and situate Its equipment effectively to attempt a rescue? It may not be able to reach a taller buildmg ThiS, to my mmd, IS a major concern and needs to be recorded as such fo r discuss 10 n or futu re refe re nce We have to ask ourselves, "why was the anginal code deslg ned and why can't thiS project comply WIth these codes mstead of requIring a variance?" What IS to stop the next project from requesting and receiving an ever larger vanance? Granting variances opens the floodgate and should only be given out for hardship cases and not economic needs At what pOint WIll you listen to your Citizens and current homeowners? 9/21/2004 t'age L or L Owen Linford - . --. __ j l--..... \ I ~-: ",,-1"'"\ 1.-- l' \llj 11--=,- ~, ::j ;'d~ ~p 2'~ :: llJ: . L PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES I CITY OF ClEAIl.WATER l_ ~ _--------- 9/2112004 Watkins, Sherry From Sent To Su bJect Reynolds, Mike Tuesday, September 21,2004 1045 AM Watkins, Sherry FW Almlnar I ,- ~...... r-.... r=...... 1........ J ... -'\\ 1= \"" !'=--=' I' \ II Ie; 'leI 1-. 1'''11'---- ,I :' I__J \.. -:' ~ u '\.J 6 J , I ......... -----.-.---1[1 \ I ), , I ' SEP 2 I 2004 ;l,J -----.J .. ,j ,~.- II " r -, I I i I \ ~ \ 1........1 ~__~ ~ Mlke Reynolds, AICP, Senlor Planner Clty of Clearwater - 727-562-4336 mlke reynolds@myclearwater com PU' If,<!'c,G & l'C\'ELOPMENT SERVICES CIT'/ OF CLE,' ?\^'A Ti::P -----Orlg1nal Message----- From JRICHTER2@tampabay rr com (malIto JRICHTER2@tampabay rr com] Sent Tuesday, September 21, 2004 9 53 AM To Reynolds, Mlke SubJect Almlnar Mr Reynolds I 11ve at 830 S Gulfvlew Blvd, and I strongly obJect to the bUlldlng of thlS magnltude Everyone agrees that glvlng these developers two varlances needed to go a mlnlmum of 14 feet over code lS detremental to Clearwater POlnt and to Clearwater Beach's fundamental character The approval to add 14 feet to the eXlstlng he1ght(from 35 feet to 49 feet) maklng the bUlldlng the ONLY waters bU11d1ng on Clearwater P01nt whlch exceeds 35 feet In add1tlon allowlng the developer to reduce the reqUlred 15' setback to 6 03' Th1S opens the door for future developers to use thls as an example Please reconslder these varlances I Jerry Rlchter 830 S Gulfvlew Blvd Clearwater Beach, Fl 33767 Watkins, Sherry From Sent To Subject . Reynolds, Mike Tuesday, September 21 , 2004 1045 AM Watkins, Sherry FW [BULK] OppoSition to 850 Bayway Blvd Importance Low ',i rl \~(C~t \OU'~-'-'\ \ i; L--/T " " '\ I' \ ll\ \ 1 SEP 2 I 2004 \' ) f I, \~l I~ ~ "" M~ke Reynolds, AICP, Senlor planner C1ty of Clearwater - 727-562-4836 mlKe reynolds@myclearwater com PLI\Nt~iNG E, DEVELOPMEN1 SERVICES C'TY OF" ClE \R'NAl ER ~.- ---~ -----Orlg1nal Message----- From dlmas chbane [ma11to dchbane@hotmall com] Sent Tuesday, September 21, 2004 7 04 AM To Reynolds, Mlke SubJect [BULK] OppOSltlon to 850 Bayway Blvd Importance Low Mr Reynold My name lS D~mas Chbane and I am the owner of 830 S Gulfv1ew Blvd I STRONGLY OBJECT to the proJect at 850 Bayway Blvd , because ~t wllll dlrectly affect the value of my property Althought 1t would not block d~rectly my Vlew, that w111 happen to several appartments 1n my bUlldlng, and consequently, the value of all appartments wlll be affected Besldes, approvlng a proJect w~th two maJor varlances to the current code would also open a precedence for future developments In Clearwater Beach In addltlon to th1S fact, I can also pOlnt to several other problems that lt w111 cause - Increase 1n traff1c 1n the area _ Increase In the already crltlcal lack of publ1c parK~ng spaces In the area _ Increase of no~se (more people, more cars ) _ Increase of securlty problems, SlnCe thlS appears to be rental unlts wlth Ilttle superv1s~on And all these problems w1l1 affect me dlrectly Clearwater pOlnt has been a peaceful area for many years and that was the maln reason for me to buy a Ulllt ~ll that area I bel1eve that lS tlme for your department to start look~ng for the well belng of us, the tax payers, and not the lnterest of a few developers Nobody else would w~n, but the developers I see no reasons for preferentlal treatment to them In thls sense, I would ask you to reconslder any posltlon taken DON' ALLOW ANY VARIATION OF TH8 CURRENT STANDARDS Regards Dlmas Chbane 830 S Gulfvlew Blvd Clearwater Beach - FL -33767 1 Watkins, Sherry From Sent To Su bJect Reynolds, Mike Tuesday, September 21, 2004 1046 AM Watkins, Sherry FW [SULK] 850 Bayway Blvd Project Hearlng,FLD2004-04026 Importance Low ir'-o--~~(clE~~fE :-[ I I 'I ' I r, '\ I SEP 2 I 2004 I: L !, iiJ LI L- jL.-, PLANr~iNG e, ['EVELOPMEr>Jl SERVICES CITY OF ,-::;I_r_ ,f ,JIll en -~~- ---------~- -- - -~ ~--~- Mlke Reynolds, AICP, Sen10r planner Clty of Clearwater - 727-562-4836 mlke reynolds@myclearwater com -~---Orlg1nal Message----- From gordonk@starband net [mallto gordonk@starband net] Sent Monday, September 20, 2004 11 17 PM To Reynolds, M1ke cc magbernfla@peoplepc com, cpolnt7@knology net SubJect [BULK] 850 Bayway Blvd ProJect Hear1ng,FLD2004-04026 Importance Low Dear Mr Reynolds, We are wrltlng th1S letter to you to reg1ster our Ob]ect10n to thlS proposed proJect We have 8 obJect1ons to thlS proJect 1 The bUlldlng code was set up to glve conslstency to the constructlon on thls end of the lsland I have not seen any compell1ng reason to change the nature of the nelghborhood 2 To change the character of the area ln thls manner wlll lead to a reductlon of value nelghbor1ng resldences 3 We are concerned about an lncrease 1n nOlse levels ln the ne1ghborhood Th1S portlon of the lsland lS not n01SY and lS qUlet and secluded We fear that thlS character w1ll change and we have seen no eV1dence to the contrary We are ent1tled to malntaln the lack of n01se at thlS end of the 1s1and 4 We are concerned about the loss of rlght of way to the street and that thlS loss would compromlse securlty and access or emergency vehlcles to the rem1nder of the nelghborhood beyond thlS structure 5 We are concerned If there lS suff1clent flre and emergency access to the bUlld1ng ltself glven the added he1ght and loss of access to the street 6 We are certa1nly ent1tled to ma1ntaln the level of securlty and amblence that we have all labored to achleve on th1S end of the lsland 7 Wlthout a SWlmmlng pool In thlS proJect, there wlll be added secur1ty problems at our pool requ1rlng more man hours to patrol our pools 8 There wlll be add1tlonal securlty problems wlth a more tranSlent populatlon For the reasons llsted above, we obJect to the proposed bUlldlng proJect at 850 Bayway Blvd slncerely Yours, Dr R Gordon Klockow Nancy J Seyfrled-Klockow 851 Bayway Blvd , Un1t #405 Clearwater Beach, Florlda :; r~')~l [E ~ [E r\./! Ie I u: ,~\ I i L~./ 1 J L.--1 , \, i 1 J' - \ ':l i SEP 2 I 2004 I LJ J d I I l..=/ : k I PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF CLE,.,PWATER 2 Watkins, Sherry From Sent To Su bJect Reynolds, Mike Tuesday, September 21, 2004 1046 AM Walkins, Sherry FW 850 Bayway Mlke Reynolds, AICP, Senlor planner Clty of Clearwater - 727-562-4836 mlke reynolds@myclearwater com -----Orlglnal Message----- From Judy Umeck [mallto umeck@yahoo com] Sent Monday, September 20, 2004 10 14 PM To Reynolds, Mlke Cc Cllfford Albrecht, Davld Bryant SubJect 850 Bayway TO Mr Mlchael Reynolds Clty of Clearwater 100 S Myrtle Ave POBox 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 FROM Wlll1am and Judy Umeck 830 Gulfv1ew Blvd, #104 Clearwater, FL 33767 Dear Slr Th1S letter 850 Bayway husband and applled for planners , lS ln reference to proposed structures at There are several questlons that my I have about varlances that have been by developers and the response by the Clty Flrst of all, we wonder why the helghth of waterfront structures, WhlCh has been 35 feet for decades, has been ralsed to 49 feet "The POlnt" has had great appeal because lt has hlgh rlse structures rlnged by "10w-r1sers" Slnce the ln1tlal conceptlon of a plan for the area ThlS allows Clearwater a solld tax base for all condos 1n the area If Clty planners lower the value of some of the "hlgh rlsers" (whlch are hlgher dens1ty) to benef1t a smaller number of unlts on the water, w111 thlS really help lncrease the overall tax value and revenues for the Clty? Add up the unlts and thlnk about thlS Secondly, when tentatlve approval was granted for the new structures, we understand that the setback was changed from flfteen feet to SlX feet Thls lS a maJor change Was a hearlng held to determ1ne thlS? Why 1S the developer asklng for th1S space? These are quest10ns the Clty planners must ask themselves Could lt be related to park1ng, whlch 1S already a problem on "The POlnt?" If the code contJnues to change, allowlng for more denlsty, less green space, less parklng, etc , th1S ~...---.-.-.-----'~-----~~ - :irl)~~~~~[~' !l: il --~ ~ ~---~---l, I ':! fl'!! SEP 2 I 2004 il-~- / __....J l~- rL \ I I '11 ~ S If] '"")=-\1: I_OPiJl t- \.11 S EIl'v'I'";C::' ~ ..../ L~""...... C ~ ~ ~'\ I j I J ,rj wl11 negat~vely lmpact the ~a ln the long run My husband and I were recently at Daytona Beach, a one-tlme hayday for beachlovers We were very surprlsed to see vacancy Slgns and open hotel rooms on a lovely Atlantlc coast beach When travellng through the downtown area, we noted many closed bUSlnesses All th~s In an area wlth great potentIal As you plan out our nelghborhood, please have the foresIght to look lnto the future of Clearwater Beach Do what you can to keep the current resldents comlng back and attract new vlsltors and prospectle buyers Thank you for your conslderatlon 8111 and Judy Umeck It lS rumored that the new facllltles WIll be rental unlts We hope thlS lS Just a rumor and not fact By keeplng most rentals at a three month mlnlmum on "the pOlnt," condo offlclals have been able to help control traffIc and the types of cllental that stay ln our "qulet" area We hope that what draws most resldents to "the pOlnt" wl11 not be lmpacted by any future dwelllngs e most obvlous reason lS parklng Thls lS already a problem at th Do you Yahool? Read only the mall you want - Yahoo I Mall SpamGuard http //promotlons yahoo com/new_mall 2 \ ~-; ,?,.~ ~~ n \\,f: r~; If-r-:':~ , ~ -~l ' ~t; ~ I ~ tl I r , r "~: !~~p~ ~]I LJ ) I...~ -' I Pt / ,;. MJG .:0, Ct-:VELOPM EN1 SERVIC~S " I-V OF Cl:'::III'WA TER Page I of I Watkins, Sherry From Capurs061@aol com Sent Friday, September 17, 2004 1 25 PM To. DANNDEBL@aol com Subject (no subject) Mr Reynolds My parents and now ,my husband and I have together have owned property at 851 Bayway Blvd for the past 18yrs We love It It IS the nicest area on Clearwater Beach and peaceful section for many years ! strongly oppose on tthe project at 850 Bayway Blvd I know It will be direct Impact on my property and the future owners Now as IS,the nOise and the people that come and go IS ndculous Just to give you a example on what happen this summer while me and my children where there It was about 830 one evening when my son called me to the window (which directly faces the C H ) said "mom you need to come here now" my son IS 12yrs old There across the street there where two people having sex, with the light and wmdows open! This IS due to lack of supervision on this property and also bemg a rental What IS gOing to happen when your developer puts IS a larger structure on this property? Are you ready to Insure me and my family that this Will not happen agaml Presently at this time there are no bUildings that are over four stones There are properties on clearwater beach that are over 750 thousand that are not over four stones Why would you and the city allow this devolper to do this? This brings me to my flanl pOint I also heard that this property Will not have a pool or access to the beach Will thiS have a Impact on our property? Will you Insure us and your developer that the renter Will not be uSing our pools and facIlity? Anna RubinO 851 Bayway Blvd Apt404 Clearwatwer Beach,FL --0 ~~~~'W~ -0-\ SEP 2 0 2004 J PLANNING & OEVELOPMEN1 SERVICES CITY OF CLEAnWATEl=l. ~ ---------~ 9/2 t/2004 Watkms, Sherry PdgC 1 of 1 From Reynolds, Mike Sent Monday, September 20,2004402 PM To Watkins, Sherry Subject FW Proposed Project 850 Bayway Blvd Mike Reynolds, AICP, Senior Planner City of Clearwater - 727-562-4836 mike reynolds@mvclearwater com -----Onglnal Message----- From: Benjamin Lamb [mallto lam528@alistream net] Sent: Fnday, September 17,20041117 AM To: Reynolds, Mike Subject: Proposed Project 850 Bayway Blvd Dear Sir My name IS Benjamin Lamb and I have been an owner/ resident at 851 Bayway Blvd S Apt 302 for over 25 years I strongly object to the presently proposed project at 850 Bayway Blvd There IS no doubt that thiS project as presently planned will have a serious Impact on the whole of Clearwater POint which has continued Since the passing of the Original "Field" ownershlp/ development to be a relatively qUiet reSidential area of reasonably priced homes There have been changes and variances west of Clearwater pOint and J can appreciate how changing market conditions can require different conSiderations But thiS IS a dreadful example of what IS sometimes referred to as "spot zOning" by drastic "variances" of the worst kind Increased height over surrounding structures and setback reductions Will badly distort the present residential character of "the POint" It IS an obVIOUS attempt by the owner?developer? to Increase the return on the value or use of the after a sale pnce has either been agreed on by the parties or IS "CONDITIONAL" upon persuading the city to justify a purchase price based on increasing denSity capability I am unable to attend the public meeting I understand IS scheduled for around Sept 21st Please ensure that bUilding speCifications which have been prepared by the city after what I am sure have been careful conSiderations by the planning department are not blithely disregarded for the purpose of enhanCing someone's personal assets Yours truly Benjamin Lamb 9/20/2004 o r 0 ~(c~~%7~Tl. \ SEP 2 0 2004 J, PLANNING & DEVELOPMENl SERVICES CITY OF CLEARWATER Page I of 2 Watkins, Sherry From Reynolds, Mike Sent Monday, September 20,2004401 PM To Walkins, Sherry Subject FW Re 850 Bayway I Chart House Location Mike Reynolds, AICP, SenIor Planner City of Clearwater - 727 -562-4836 mike revnolds@mvclearwatercom :i nl~~~~~]~ "_.~'\ Ilf~~ :u' Il L\ SEP 2 0 2004 ~ I PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF CLEARWATER -----Onglnal Message----- Fmm: HugJeanne@aol com [mallto HugJeanne@aoJ com] Sent: Thursday, September 16, 20049'52 PM To: Reynolds, Mike Subject: Re 850 Bayway I Chart House LocatIon Michael Reynolds C/Clty of Clearwater 100 S Myrtle Ave Clearwater, FI 33758-4748 Mr Reynolds My name IS Gertrude Hartnett and Iltve at 851 S Bayway Blvd Apt 704 I strongly object to the proposed project at 850 Bayway Blvd, because thIs directly has a negative Impact on the value of my property Based on the plans It appears that these units win be rental units with people coming and gOing constantly Who IS gOing to buy my unit with the nOise coming from across the street This happens now to a lesser extent with no one on the property for superviSion Place a larger structure on this piece of land and the problem becomes greater There are no motels on this end of Bayway Blvd This IS a residential section and has been peaceful for many years This brings me to another pOint I believe your department has not been looking out for the residents of Clearwater POint which has a large tax base and voting block I feel your department has bent over backwards for the developer In approving TWO variances so the developer can bUild the bUilding he wants and not what IS In the best Interest of the resIdents of Clearwater POint and Clearwater Beach At present there are no bUildings on Bayway that are over four stones The developer got from your department a vanance to go fourteen feet plus a roof over code He also got a vanance 10 have his property SIX feet from the pavement There has been a lot of building gOing on In Clearwater Beach With condo Units costing $750,000+ None of these bUildings are over four stones Why should the city allow thiS developer be the exception? 9/20/2004 Gertrude Hartnett 851 S Bayway Blvd, Apt 704 Clearwater Beach, FI 33767 9/20/2004 Page 20f2 ,..--..., .--~...... .. l -II .........~l[ JI r,. l....T_, - I ~ 'l.~ L) I ;- '. 1M Il --' i' \ l ~1 , .I I L:=l \::::J _J U \.} ...::..--~ ' : I _.---- -~~ 1 I Ili~ill SEP 20 am Ii Lb: PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT I SERVICES I CITY OF CLEMnWATER Reynolds, Mike From: Sent: To: Subject: lee/bea Smith [Ieebeasmlth@webtv net] Monday, September 20,2004335 PM Reynolds, Mike Almlnar Mr Reynolds strongly obJect at 855 Bayway Blvd The new rentals w~ll create more trafflc and nOlse problems than we antlclpated havlng at thls relatlvely qulet end of the beach Slnce many of the condo owners (and tax payers) are away for the summer, they wlIl have Ilttle chance to VOlce thelr obJectlons Your department has approved 2 varlances that wlll dlrectly affect my property Slnce the new propertles have a varlance to have the property 6 feet from the pavement and another varlance to bUlld 14 feet plus a roof over code, thls wlll affect the appearance of the area and open the door for changlng other restrlctlons I feel there was a good reason for havlng these rules, and they should not be changed now Mary B, Smlth 855 Bayway Blvd C602 Clearwater, Fl. 33767 I to proJect Almlnar across the street from my property \i'rJ-~~(C~~w~ II ~~ ) r-= \ lr-'~1 SEP 2 0 2004 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CI fY OF CLE"RVJ^TEq r~~ ~., 01 ,.,::J 1 J:dgt: .1 VI I Reynolds, Mike From: Sharon Grzesiak [vzd1 s122@venzon netJ Sent. Monday, September 20, 2004 4 09 PM To: Reynolds, Mike Subject: Objection to 850 Bayway Blvd Marie Scanlan 855 Bayway Blvd. Apt. # 101 Clearwater Beach, FL 33767 II , (~ ::J - ---' l ~ 11-- I j -..J "I II \lr I i L=-- J ,_/ ....:=.-=- L ~r ~.::::~ t [ ~r-;~~~~~-'l Lb I . PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF ClEr\RWA fER MIchael Reynolds CICIty of Clearwater 100 S Myrtle Ave. Box 4748 Clemwater, FL 33758 VIA Ematl Mike reynolds@rnyclearwater com September 20th, 2004 Dear Mr Reynolds I am wntmg to you as I Wish to strongly obJect to the proposed project at 850 Bayway Blvd as thIS wIll dIrectly have a negatIve Impact on the value of my property and my qualIty of lIfe. I am a retired widow and chose to buy my retIrement home 10 Clearwater Pomt as It IS a qmte res1dentIal neIghborhood ThIS wlll change dramatically If these plans go through as It appears they wIll be rental propertIes With people commg and gomg constantly It would also appear that thiS property will not have a pool and so we wIll have these renters trymg to use our pool and so wIll mcrease our secunty costs Will there be a reductIon 10 my taxes to cover thiS extra cost? And what of my property value? ThIS end of Clearwater has no motels and is reSIdentIal WhICh keeps the property value m hne WIth the pnce I paId when I purchased my condo Havmg an "overmght accommodation" property across the street will reduce my property value slgmficantly No bU1ldmgs on Bayway are over four stones tall mcludmg all the new condos and town homes that are currently bemg butlt ThiS proposal IS askmg to go over that heIght, WhICh agam, I strongly object to I am a law-abIdmg, tax paymg resIdent of Clearwater Pomt and I belIeve If you allow thIS and slTInlar vanatlOns from the baSIC code thIS w111 detract from the fundamental character of thiS neIghborhood Please do not let thIS happen Mane Scanlan 9/20/2004 Watkins, Sherry From- Sent To Subject Reynolds, Mike Monday, September 20,2004403 PM Watkms, Sherry FW Project at 850 Bayway "::, Mlke Reynolds, AICP, Senlor planner Clty of Clearwater - 727-562-4836 rnlke reynolds@myclearwater com i " . I I _ _~.\.J'L-_J L : ! ~tP -2 0;- ji U } : L"L-- t.=/ I PU\NNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF ClEAFtWATER -----orlg1nal Message----- From Rlchard Jeffery [mallto rtJeffery@gmall com] Sent Monday, september 20, 2004 3 25 PM To: Reynolds, Mlke subJect ProJect at 850 Bayway Abbrevlated emall copled from orlglnal letter sent Vla postal system not sure lf the letter was gOlng to reach you before the hearlng 851 Bayway Blvd #406 Clearwater, FL 33767 Mr Reynolds- It has recently come to my attentlon that there lS a proposed proJect at 850 Bayway Blvd that lS requestlng slgnlflcant varlatlon to the bUlldJ.ng code I llve across the street from the proposed proJect and strenuously obJect to allowlng the suggested varlances for the followlng reasons . I bel1eve that It wlll dJ.mlnlsh the property value of my nelghborhood . Commerclal property wlll be galn1ng a larger foothold ln a prlmarlly resldentlal nelghborhood . NOlse WhlCh has always been a problem wlth that property wl1l get worse . Street parkJ.ng wJ.ll potentlally become more congested . There are no bUlldlngs on the water over 4 storles and lf we allow thlS var1ance does 1t not open the door for more proJects? . The setback varlance wl1l slgnlflcantly change the appearance of the nelghborhood - a wlde open frlendly nelghborhood wlll have a sore thumb stJ.cklng out - practlcally lnto the streetl If you do not llve 1D our ne19hborhood, please conslder walklng through It at a nlce slow pace (on a weekend or after work) Pretend for a moment that you do Ilve here and ask yourself lf you would want thlS proJect to go forward I vote no Slncerely, Rlchard Jeffery 9/16/04 1 Page I of 1 Watkms, Sherry From Reynolds, Mike Sent Monday, September 20,2004403 PM To. Watkins, Sherry Subject FW Objection to Proposed Project at 850 Bayway Blvd , :JL=-~II I J Il~ \L - , ~ { I ,1 , I \~ l PlJ.\F"JNING & DE:VELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF CLS-\RWA TER , J -- -- - -- - - - i: LJ , )LP 2 0 2004 L~ Mike Reynolds, AICP, Senior Planner City of Clearwater - 727-562-4836 mike reynolds@myclearwater com -----Onglnal Message----- From: JUNEBSMITH@aol com [mallto JUNEBSMITH@aol com] Sent: Monday, September 20,200410 51 AM To: Reynolds, Mike Cc: cwpt8@tampabay rf com Subject: Objection to Proposed Project at 850 Bayway Blvd Dear Mr Reynolds, I object to the proposed project at 850 Sayway for the following reasons 1 the peace and serenity of thiS area will be disrupted with the Increased volume of transient tenants 2 I strongly disagree with approval of variance to codes which were esabhshed for the common good of the reSidents Variance for thiS project absolutely should not be approved You Will be performing a disservice to reSidents, not a service, which IS your Job 3 These vanances are negative precedence setting 4 These new constructions Will have a negative effect on the overall value of my reSidence, including peace, serenity, beauty, traffic and congestion, and monetary value Sincerely, June Smith 830 So Gulfvlew Blvd #305 Clearwater, FL 33767 9/21/2004 09/1 7/2004 Page 1 of2 Watkins, Sherry From Sent To Subject Importance Reynolds, Mike Monday, September 20,2004403 PM Watkins, Sherry FW Aim I n arDeve 10 p me nl Response High --~- - --~ '. ~~~~ 1~~~ ~r ~~ : ~ -.. fr- ~-I r f '~'-" ' I' ~ I' r '-...:-' i \\ ~, , 'I '1'- \ I~ 11 \ , I I ' \,J}I~--L ' --,' I I l: 1 j L=J ""-.../ ~ W L.~~ 1 I, '.....-I ,------ -- ---~I, I !Irp~\\ llL) : \ U i SEP 2 0 2004 L",,/ Mike Reynolds, AICP, Senior Planner City of Clearwater - 727-562-4836 mike revnolds@mvcJearwater com PLANNiNG & oeVElOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF CLE~\R\NATER --~~-.----.-----'" -----Onglnal Message--m From: dawn [mallto dawnmk2000@comcast net] Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2004 12.51 PM To: Reynolds, Mike Su bject: Aim I na rDevelopmentRes ponse Importance: High 09117/2004 Mr MIchael Reynolds Semor Planner CIty of Clearwater 100 S Myrtle Ave POBox 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 Mike rey:nolds@myc1earwatcr com Re 850 Bayway/Chart House Locations Mr Reynolds I am a reSident of Clearwater Pomt I reSide at 800 S Gulf VIew Blvd, Clearwater, FL 33767-3026 I have been a reSident of Clearwater at thIS address as, well as another for better than 30 years I have seen much development m the Clearwater Beach and Pomt area m thIs, s,pan of years Development either eommerc131 or reSidentIal should have a benefiCial effect upon the commumty where It IS placed Development should also not negatively affect the property values oflong standmg reSidential Unit,') or the enjoyment of the quality ofhfe ofthe reSIdents of those Units o Property values on the beach and pomt m Clearwater as you know are determIned by proxImity to the beach as well as Vlew of the gulf, bay and beach It provides Why IS It that a development IS approved that directly effect':; property values and the qualIty of life of mdlvldudls? OrdlOances and bUlldmg codes arc set mto law for valId reasons They ensure not only safety of construction but also ensure that eltlzen<;; whom may be Impacted negatively by constructIOn of a 9/21/2004 09/] 7/2004 Page 2 of2 structure ell e protected by the law WIth these pomts m mmd let's examme the Almmar Development that has been approved with vanances The followmg pOtnt~ ofmterest should be considered . The approval of the vanance m heIght A 14 foot vanance from ordmanccs and code AlIowmg the height of the structure to be extended from 35 'to 49' This vanance WIll make It the only structure on Clearwater Pomt that Will exceed 35' The heIght vanance will dlrectly affect the property values and the reSident's nght to mamtam their current quailty of !tfe by "loss of view" . The approval of the developer to reduce the current code of IS' to 6 03' This will also "break-up the Vlew of the shoreline . Thl,', development also does not Include space for a pnvate reSIdential pool Other similar structures on the POint do This wtll inVIte "pool hoppers" mto current resldenttal pools Thus requmng Increased cost of secunty to reSidents of eXlstmg structures to patrol unauthonzed use of their pools No others structures on Bayway currently exceed four stones but thIS developer has managed to dcfueve the needed vanances from you to bUIld thiS development The only way thIS development IS a boom to the CIty IS through added tax dollars that would be collected What good are these additional tax dollars If thIS development actually causes a decrease III property values? I am sure that If thIS project was allowed to go forward that there WIll be many requests for reassessments ThIS development has upset many longtIme re,',ldents of both Clearwater Pomt and Bcaeh Is the city ready to defend the approval ofthe vanances In bUIldIng code to the mevltable laWSUIts stemmmg from reSIdents for the "loss of vIew", loss of property value and loss of quality of !tfe? The developer can build luxury umts In thiS area while aChIeVIng his profit margm Without the consequence of negatively affectmg others Smcerely, John Bagdon 800 S Gulf view Blvd Clearwater, FL 33767-3026 Tel 727-442-1761 \ nj SEP 202004 \ )/ I I L~ 1.-"'- i : PLANNlNG & OEVElOPMENl SE R'JiCES ury ']r CL E;,P'/IATEq -~~~~~--------.---'-~- 9/21/2004 Page I of 1 Watkins, Sherry From Reynolds, Mike Sent Monday, September 20,2004402 PM To Watkins, Sherry Subject FW reynolds@myclearwater com> Mike Reynolds, AICP, Senior Planner City of Clearwater - 727-562-4836 mike revnolds@mvclearwater com -----Onglnal Message----- From: Clearwater Beach [mallto c1ealWaterbeach@hotmail com] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 5 19 PM To: Reynolds, Mike Subject: reynolds@myclearwater com> Mr Reynolds My name JS Marcelo Altemar and I lIve at 800 S Gulfvlew Blvd # 204 I would Irke to express my oplnlOn on the proposed project at 850 Bayway Blvd I strongly object to the project because of all the exceptions approved to developer among others, the request to add 14' to the eXisting heIght, reduced setback to 6.03' I also think that more and more our City representatIves are looking out for tOUrists Instead of local reSidents what happened With our mayor In the past electIOn shows that reSidents want to be heard Sure, there IS a happy medium In which we can develop the beach for tOUrists and have also reSidents satisfied respectfully Marcelo Altemar t ........- ~\ I~-I(--:...~r~ ~ : j ( ')! LS IL:, IE I: '" '/ ' 'C/~u v !L.._ , """.~ _ k~ f j !tnjl~EP~ 0 2004 Ji L); ,I l,~ , L~ PLANNiNG & D[VElOPME S~ NT l: RVICES ,_ .:~~L~'~~~~!,TEP -............... --~~ 9/21/2004 Page I of2 Watkms, Sherry From Sent To Subject Reynolds, Mike Monday, September 20,2004402 PM Watkins, Sherry FW re 850 Bayway Blvd Mike Reynolds, AICP, Senior Planner City of Clearwater - 727-562-4836 mike revnolds@mvclearwatercom -----Onglnal Message----- From: domellna ramos [mallto domellna_1@yahoo ca] Sent' Friday, September 17, 2004 10 37 AM To: Reynolds, Mike SubJect: re 850 Bayway Blvd ~_'::1 ~:.:: \ 1-/ - ~ r j r r ('" I ...~ 1 J J ~ l I j I I : llb"~'lSU'&~I' iW;\11 SEP 20 2aM Ii LJ i I x l~'L C/ PLANr~ING & flEVEt.QPMENT SERVICES CITY OF CLE,-\PWATER Mr Michael Reynolds CIClty of Clearwater 100 S Myrtle Ave Box 4748 Clearwater, FI Dear Mr. Reynolds, Our names are Domelma and Jose Ramos and we hve at 851 S Bayway Blvd Apt 304 We strongly object to the proposed project at 850 Bayway Blvd, beeau::.e thIS dIrectly has a negatlve Impact on the value of our property Based on the plans It appears that these umts will be rental umts wIth people commg and gomg constantly Who IS gomg to buy our umt with the nOise commg from aeross the street? We beheve that your department has not been lookmg out for the reSIdents of Clearwater Pomt, whIch has a large tax base and votmg block We feel your department haE. bent over backwards for the developer III approvmg TWO vananees so the developer can butld the bUIldmg he wants and not what is m the best mterest of the reSidents of Clearwater Pomt and Clearwater Beach At present there are no bUlldmgs on Baway that are over four stones ThiS developer got a vanance to go fourteen feet plus a roof over code from your department I He also got a vanance to have hIS property SIX feet from the pavement There has been a lot ofbUlldmg gOing on m Clearwater Beach with condo UnIts costmg $750,000+ None of these bUlldmgs are over four stone& Why should the city allow thiS developer to be the exceptIOn? Sincerely, Jose Ramos 9/21/2004 Page 20f2 Domehna Ramos 851 S Bdyway Blvd Apt 304 Clearwater Beach, FI 33767 Post your free ad now! Yahoo! Can!!d~Cr..Smlals. - - _ t j I I \ I ~ '-_ _, j &- :l l\ ~ I '~~'~ ~~~~ u__~~ : j i I, j I '\ ~ SI:JJ 2 0 2nn4 II ) J 1\' - -~~ II'" ._~; I~~/ I L ----' OLtd'I,~I"IG 8, r:[VELOPMENl SERVICES -:;ITY OF CLC:,.,i:;',MA fEg 9/21/2004 Re nolds, Mike From Sent: To' SubJect: Richard Jeffery [rtjeffery@gmall com) Wednesday, September 22, 2004 9 28 AM Reynolds, MIke fd12004-04026 Square footage and Change In Width Mr Reynolds, SEP 2 8 2004 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER At the meetlng yesterday, I was told that I would be provlded wlth the change In square footage and change In wldth of the bUlldlng belng proposed at 850 Bayway I have not been provlded the lnformatlon as of yet_ Would you provlde thlS lnformatlon? In addltlon, do we have any numbers on the actual helght lncrease of the bUl1dlng? Could you also provlde the emall address of the person(s) that you report to? Thank you, Rlchard Jeffery 1 <-1 Reynolds, Mike From: Sent To: Cc: SUbJect: Judy Umeck [umeck@yahoo com] Monday, September 20,20041018 PM Reynolds, Mike Clifford Albrecht, DavId Bryant 850 Bayway TO Mr Mlchael Reynolds Clty of Clearwater 100 S Myrtle Ave POBox 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 FROM Wllllam and Judy Umeck 830 Gulfvlew Blvd , #104 Clearwater, FL 33767 Dear Slr ThlS letter 850 Ba:yway husband and applled for planners lS In reference to proposed structures at There are several questlons that my I have about varlances that have been by developers and the response by the Clty Flrst of all, we wonder why the helghth of waterfront structures, WhlCh has been 35 feet for decades, has been ralsed to 49 feet. "The POlnt" has had great appeal because lt has hlgh rlse structures rlnged by "10w-rlsers" Slnce the lnltlal conceptlon of a plan for the area ThlS allows Clearwater a SOlld tax base for all condos ln the area. If Clty planners lower the value of some of the "hlgh rlsers" (WhlCh are hlgher denslty) to beneflt a smaller number of unlts on the water, wlll thlS really help lncrease the overall tax value and revenues for the Clty? Add up the unlts and thlnk about thlS. Secondly, when tentatlve approval was granted for the new structures, we understand that the setback was changed from flfteen feet to SlX feet ThlS lS a maJor change Was a hearlng held to determlne thlS? Why lS the developer asklng for thlS space? These are questlons the Clty planners must ask themselves. Could lt be related to parklng, whlch lS already a problem on "The POlnt?1I If the code contlnues to change, allowlng for more denlsty, less green space, less parklng, etc , thlS wl11 negatlvely lmpact the area ln the long run My husband and I were recently at Daytona Beach, a one-tlme hayday for beachlovers We were very surprlsed to see vacancy Slgns and open hotel rooms on a lovely AtlantlC coast beach When travellng through the downtown area, we noted many closed buslnesses All thlS ln an area wlth great potentlal. AS you plan out our nelghborhood, please have the foreslght to look lnto the future of Clearwater Beach. Do what you can to keep the current resldents cOffilng back and attract new Vlsltors and prospectlve buyers 1 RECEIVED SEP 2 8 2DD~ PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF ClEARWATER Thank ydu for your consldera__on B~ll and Judy Umeck Do you Yahool? Express yourself wlth Yl Messenger! Free Download now http //messenger yahoo com 2 Page 1 of 1 Reynolds, Mike From' YAZANandMASON@aolcom Sent Tuesday, September 21, 2004 11 47 AM To: Reynolds, Mike Subject: Objection to the proposed project at 850 Bayway Blvd REGEPJED SEP 2 8 2004 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF ClEARWATER Mr Reynolds My name IS Saml AL-Khushman I am lIVing at 851 Bayway Blvd # 906 and raising two kids 5 and 3 years old I object to the proposed project at 850 Bayway Blvd due to the following reasons 1-Frequent nOise coming from the bUilding 2-0ccasltlonal sexual inappropriate behavIour that has been observed at times when some of the guests allowed this act to bee seen by turning the light on and not seeking pnvacy, which creats Inaproppnate enVIronment to ralS kids as-well-as dlsruptmg the atomphespher of resldetlal, family nelborhood 9/28/2004 Page 1 of 1 Reynolds, Mike From: MIchael Elsen [m elsen@elsen-hemer de] Sent: Friday, September 24,2004821 AM To: Reynolds, Mike Subject: 850 Bayway/Chart House LocatIon ReceIVED SEP 2 B 20D~ PLANNING DEPARlMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Michael Reynolds ClOt:<; of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Box 4748 Clearwater, FI 33758-4748 Dear Mr Reynolds, my name IS Bernhard Elsen and I am the owner of Apartment 908 at 830 South Guffvlew Boulevard In Clearwater Beach, I strongly object to the proposed project at 850 Bayway Boulevard because It does directly have a negative Impact on the value of my condominium ThIS end of Bayway Boulevard IS a peaceful reSidential area With no motels development. It appears to me that the proposed project Will change thiS In a very dramatic way since there Will be rental umts With a continuous number of people coming and gOlngl With the proposed much larger building the number of disturbances WIll be largerl All thiS unrest will bring my property value down' Also I believe that your department has not been looking out for the Clearwater POint resIdents and owners which represent a large tax base I feel that your department has bent over backwards for the developer In approving two vanances so the developer can bUIld the bUIlding he wants and not what,s In the best Interest of the reSidents, owners, our neIghborhood, CJearwater Beach and last but not least for the taxpayers. At the moment there are no bUIldings on Bayway Boulrvard that exceed four stones. This developer dId get approval from your department for a vanance to go fourteen feet plus a roof over code He also received a vanance to have hiS property SIX feet from the pavement There has been a lot of bUilding gOing on In Clearwater Beach WIth condo umts costing hIgh $ amounts and none of these bUildings are over four stones high I am very Interested to hear why the CIty allows thiS developer to be the exception as well your answer to my concerns and those tof my fellow owners/neighbors. Best regards, Bernhard Elsen 830 South Gulfvlew Boulevard, # 908 Clearwater Beach, FI 33767, USA Am Zollstock 25 61352 Bad Homburg vdH, Germany Fan, +49-6172-41534 Fax, +49-69-247749-30 9/2812004 Keith. Zayac & Associates, Ioe.. CIVIl Eng1l1eermg Landscape Architecture Plannll1g 701 Entelpll5.e Road E , Ste 404 Safety Hat bor, FL 34695 (727) 793~9888 Phone (727) 793-9855 Fax kelthzayac@aol com TO: Mlke Reynolds CIty of Clearwater Plannmg Department 100 S Myrtle Ave, 2ud Floor Clearwater, FL 33758 DATE: JOB#: RE: June 1, 2004 319-04 AlmlOar WE ARE SENDING YOU THE FOLLOWING ITEMS [x ] Attached I ] Shop Drawmgs [ ] Copy of Letter [ ] Under Separate Cover VIa { ] Prmts [ ] Change Order ] Plans ] SpecificatIOns [ J Samples [ ] See Below COPIES DATE DESCRIPTION 3 Storm water CalculatIons t'~ r- 'tV t, . -= ~ 1 qr--= n r.'" -~~ """~16!~ It "'"\J.r-..Io-;:.( ~t,,~",......-..;::.!J ~ L.~~ JUN U1 LUU't n /1\ ~\ , ~ I); _I ~;\~'( 6 n~1~n~ U t n" if ( \ f- (, U:/.\RV\:'!'.rr~ THESE ARE TRANSMITTED As Checked Below [ ] For approval [] Reviewed, no comments [ ] For your use {] Reviewed, comments as noted [ ] As requested [] Returned for corrections [x ] For review and comment ] Resubmit _ copies for approval ] Submit _ copIes for dlstnbutlOn ] Return _ corrected prmts Mike, please transmit these stormwater calculations to engmeermg wIth the preVIOusly REMARKS: submltted reVIsed gradmg and dramage plans NAME: cc: TITLE: PreSident II kelthzayac@aol com '"U ...., .s CD Q. tTJ -t:. CO VI <: 0 0 a 0 0 5 >- ;:0 IJ:l ::l ~ .....,j '" 3 S' Qj 0 8 V> w 0 CD "'0 0 5 5 0.. ("> ...... '" '" ...., 0 0 ~ ~ ...., (Il <'I> @ ......, w a a 0;1 ,.-., (1) 5" <'I> -1 ~ 2- w "d a 0 (ll V> b::l !::J ~ -) J:f 0 :::0 I -t:. <'I> VI cn~ -t:. 0 "-t:. '" .D -t:. 0 n c: VI VI -.l VI "Tj (\l -.l IV ~ ::; -.l 0 I>' 0 v. "tI:::E N' (Il 0 0 -t:. <:::> Ul ~~ 0.. 0 -t:. ~ Z 'Tl e ~ (p ;:';l W ::l ... ::;1 :!l "Tl Q. It> - C) c.. ., -(). ~ \ll \} 0 (p ttl,o '" >- t- ... l: ....j ~ -.!\ 2: ~ 3 '-0 <: '" IN - . (p 0, {/JiJQ J j~f g ,::; 'Tl>- '-< < 0 ...., 0 III -. !?. '" nl c ~ \II' 0--. a 3 '-.../~ (l> ~ l' S- 0< (Il '-0 :. 0, e~ ~ t~ ' c: 0 'Tj 3 0 <:::> .....,j<1> '" @" ~ '{o o~ f '-0 a en 0- \Y.} a ~< a .}.- '-0 a .....,j!?. S': 0 0 \N .I:;. w '" IV '-< + '-0 v. IV .I:;. .l:>. ?;1 () ()....; ~ e N ~ '-0 c:::::l. a 0 0 ~ ....; w , <: .I:;. IV :::Ja 1 VI J .l:>. 0 t- '-0 ~ .l:>. -A . . f' Keith Zayac & Associates., Inc. CivIl Engmeenng, Landscape Architecture, Plannmg 701 Enterprise Road E, Ste 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 (727) 793-9888 Phone (727) 793-9855 Fax kelthzayac@aol com TO: Mtke Reynolds CIty of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S Myrtle Ave, 2nd Floor Clearwater, FL 33758 DATE: JOB#: RE: June 1, 2004 319-04 AlmlOar WE ARE SENDING YOU THE FOLLOWING ITEMS [x ] Attached [ ] Shop Drawmgs [ ] Copy of Letter [ ] Under Separate Cover VIR [ ] Pnnts [ ] Change Order ] Plans ] SpecificatIOns [ ] Samples [ 1 See Below COPIES DATE DESCRIPTION 3 Storm water CalculatIons ~~~~n~\g~rn IJ \,) L= '0JV l=>> II V b'== ~ . JUN U 1 f-l~ A\I;JI;>,m~~l') D~~dip\~ n nUJ~u':j U (:jITV Of' CLEA~W~lr[E~ THESE ARE TRANSMIITED As Checked Below [ ] For approval [] RevIewed, no comments [ ] For your use [] RevIewed, comments as noted [ ] As requested [] Returned for correctIOns [x ] For review and comment ] ResubmIt _ copies for approval ] Submit _ copIes for dlstnbutlOn ] Return _ corrected pnnts Mike, please transmit these storm water calculatIons to englOeermg With the prevIOusly REMARKS: submitted reVIsed gradmg and drainage plans TITLE: cc: SIGNED: NAME: kelthzayac@aol com " -, ) \' r- , ~ '<t 0'1 ,....J '<:t D ,- t -f-- <rl 01 '<t o "'- r- ~ a > . ,..., a t::J a '7 t 01 0- ::J ' u ~ '<:t c-- U 01 <rl '<:t -+ 0'1 ~ 01 '<:t ~1 ~ c,"\ 'Of- a a a a 0'1 >>";- 0 u::J a 'D 0- , l'I\ uu \\ t <( ~1~ d) ~ ~~ t, D O)f-< 0 E u... a .... ;:l I -:J '0 -S t~ c ~U 0- " ::: ~~~ ... f <!) .... ~ ~,~ ~ ~ " \:i --.: t ... ca a r- e a > ~ ~~~ ..... <(>.t.- o <:: 01)1/) '0 'E u t- "'l 0'1 S ::l > 5 j ~ ~ O'co <:( '" <J d) ... - ~ ..... '- 15 \p. \S" ~ '"' u. u. f-- c ~ ~ I/) "'l 0 "'- '<:t 0 -a ce '---.J~ ~ ::.. en 0 '<:t a 0 d) 1\ "., a ~ (..L. 0 !:l LJ ,l\. N t'- r-- \- 'n r-- <rl .<cn <rl 5- '<to 0 '<:t 0 "d- 'n d) '<:t L 0::: G3 CO '" ~ 0 <U ,--., 'E Pc "l ::: ca f-- 0) 0 rL> -.:::. III @) E E U'i '- <( ~ "- 0 0) rL> ;:; 0 '" t:: .... "'::! 5 0 e u "" ::: Pc 0 .5 cn ..5 ;;:. ;J 0 <:( CO '" c.::: E- ::: <:( ro ;:: 0 0 ce 0 0 > "d- <rl 0) @ U <1.l 0' .... 0., .j I .. = <l.I E .. ::<l <l.I .. ~ ~ "'l ::l 0'-< l.o t! "C ": = ~~ R~CEuV~[)) JUN 0 1 200~ PlJ\NN~~G DE\P.~~tM\~Ji~lr cnCY OF CU::..ARWAliE~ ~ ~ o ~ o o N <;t~ N >. '" :E N <;t ~ o~ ..,.., >D;- N t-'::l C'1 CU 0 0'. of--; >~ 0 0 , 0 0 Q ::J -::t .<U 0 0.0 0'. ~ 1.'5 a -ii, ~&;: -0;:; >u ~ 2S ifJ li:; (..L., N ifJ .... ..,.., (..L., li:; 'r> t- ..,.., 0 -::t '<t ..,.., ~~ 0 0 <:t \0 C'1 c<"1 -< '" <l.l <~ OJlifJ > -< o o -::t 00 0\ o o -::t 00 Q, '" 0 0 ~~ a 0 00 0 a \0 \0 ("") W3 C!l '" --- ~ <I) 2 i:: 0 @ ... '" 1- <r: CO .... (.Il 5 tt: <l.l i:: '- @) Z Cl. E 0 0 r ..9 r;;; !:: E '" !:: 0.. '" .8 ifJ -<t: Cfl ~ 0 <I) <l.l ~ -0 ... <l.l ~ U Cfl i:: "'C if) U l:: '" 2 0' ... '" 0 0 0... > ..,.., .,.., V M @ -::t E- LL.. :) U :J t ] -.,l- W ~X ,< _ t'\ Q<)t ~ II :(" t :s-i (J ~ t - .{ r-- > \j'-.1)M J\ V t ~I Q\2~ ~ S - l\l \!' - QJ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~\-~ ....... I..L.. .,.., N ,'1 o 0-. N '<t '<t <l.l E ;:J -0 > .... ..... Z ~ <L> ... E- "'C <l.l ;:: ;:J v v ~ ~ ~ a -0 d) ] ;:l ..2 '" U AC AY 2 8 2D04 .E, NO. 48192 Keith Zayac & Associates<t Inc. CIVIl Engineenng, Landscape ArchItecture, Plannmg 701 Enterpnse Road E , Ste 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 (727) 793-9888 Phone (727) 793-9855 Fax kelthzayac@aol com TO: Mr Mike Reynolds City of Clearwater Planmng Department DATE: JOB#: RE: May 28, 2004 31 O~04/perrnJt LaRlsa Il WE ARE SENDING YOU THE FOLLOWING ITEMS (x ] Attached [ ] Shop Drawmgs [ ] Copy of Letter ( ] Under Separate Cover Via [ ] Pnnts ( ] Change Order ] Plans ] SpecificatIons ] Samples ] See Below , , , COPIES ,DATE , DESCRIPTION 3 Revised Gradmg and Dramage Plan ~~c~,~VED u ",~ UA.V ? R ?fiQ4 nn. - " __ "",rrlLll\,F'T\\~E.~ - THESE ARE TRANSMITTED As Checked Below r p~;OF~ClEA~~WA1ER [ ] For approval {] ReVIewed, no comments [ ] For your use [] RevIewed, comments as noted [ ] As requested [] Returned for correctIOns { x] For review and comment ] Resubmit _ caples for approval ] Submit _ copies for dlstnbutlOn ] Return _ corrected pnnts REMARKS: These reVised plans are submitted to you at the request of Elhot Showberg addressmg location of the proposed stormwater pond Please forward to him for review CC: I I SIGNED: NAME: Keith E Zayac, P E , RLA TITLE: I Presldent I kelthzayac@aol com -I --- ~1 /!A/YjJ2/O/V CtLLf~!,- qS I J 1/~' )6-I!i.r) Page 1 of 1 !a " RECEnlED Reynolds, Mike ~ ) ~ From: T JBrady [tjbrady@totallnk net] Sent: Saturday, September 11 , 2004 12 56 PM To Reynolds, Mike Subject: Chart House SEP 1 3 2DD\ PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY Of OLEARWATER Mr Reynolds, Please enter our objections Into the record regarding the conversion of , The Chart House to a condominium and hotel We object to exceeding the 35 foot rule thus opening the door for future developers to do the same thing We are concerned that we will need to heighten our secunty at our pools @ Clearwater POint because of the fact that the renovatIons to 850 Bayway do not call for a pool We also object to the developers adding to the eXisting heIght of the bUIlding, Sincerely Thomas J and Barbara J Brady 855 Bayway ..... 9/13/2004 Page 1 of 1 Reynolds, Mike RECEIVED' From Sent, To' Cc SubJect Genl67@aol com Saturday, Septem ber 11, 2004 1 17 PM Reynolds, Mike MAGBERNFLA@peoplepc com 650 Bayway Blvd SEP 1 3 2004 PlANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER It seems allowances to height, distance of bUilding from street, etc were all determrned without any notification to the neighbors It seems heights of bUildings IS an adjustlble Issue wIthout regard to surroundrng area What about parkrng for the proposed bUilding? What about the Issue of residents of the new bUlldrng assumrng that they are entitled to use the facIlities of Clearwater Pornt I understand there IS no sWlmmrng pool planned for the new bUlldrng Overall It seems that the planned bUlldrng will Jam the property to the breakrng pOint What IS the purpose of 6 motel rooms? More traffiC? More transients rn and out? It seems to me that our elected offiCials are not taking rnto account the best rnterests of the majority of reSidents of Clearwater POint Robert & Janet Gobeli GenI67@AOLCOM 9/13/2004 Page 1 of 1 Reynolds, Mike tJ ~ From: T JBrady [tjbrady@tota!lnk net] Sent' Saturday, September 11, 2004 12 56 PM To Reynolds, Mike Subject: Chart House eECEIllED SEP 1 3 2004 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF OLlARWATIA Mr Reynolds, Please enter our objections mto the record regarding the converSion of The Chart House to a condominium and hotel We object to exceeding the 35 foot rule thus opening the door for future developers to do the same thing We are concerned that we Will need to heIghten our secunty at our pools @ Clearwater POint because of the fact that the renovations to 850 Bayway do not call for a pool We also object to the developers adding to the eXisting height of the bUilding, Sincerely Thomas J and Barbara J Brady 855 Bayway 9/13/2004 Page 1 of 1 Reynolds, Mike RECEUtED' From Genl67@aol com Sent: Saturday, September 11, 2004 1 17 PM To Reynolds, Mike Cc MAGBERNFLA@peoplepc com Subject: 850 Bayway Blvd SEP 1 3 2004 PlANNING DEPARDJIENT CITY OF CLEARWATER It seems allowances to heIght, dIstance of bUilding from street, etc were all determmed without any notification to the neIghbors It seems heights of bUildings IS an adjustlble Issue without regard to surrounding area What about parking for the proposed bUIlding? What about the Issue of reSidents of the new building assuming that they are entitled to use the faCIlities of ClealWater POint I understand there IS no sWimming pool planned for the new bUilding Overall It seems that the planned bUIlding Will jam the property to the breakmg pOint What IS the purpose of 6 motel rooms? More traffic? More tranSients In and out? It seems to me that our elected offiCials are not takmg Into account the best mterests of the maJonty of reSidents of ClealWater POint Robert & Janet Gobeil GenI67@AOL COM 9/13/2004 Jun 10 04 02:03p Barn~ Watt 905 4"'--- 0566 p. 1 ~,. , ' ..-----r-- lAy. lb. \~lKE ReY I\JQLb-S, =It Of ?A~E So (I ~ QU:i'>1 NG) u\Jt::iZ) : . 3 , , TRaM - S-~l~A ~I' ~~ATT 0/) U \< ycJ\lT . pU~=:ASe ?ASS eN \V €'-\tV--E ~~'1 j\JOL0<;:' I mM~ D {A \12 L Y , 1?e r0 f2E ~', ,+S -ria O-A ~ A~ IJ~ ~ : RECEIVED JUN 1 0 2004 ,PLANNING DEPARTMENT I CITY OF CLEARWATER rf Jun 10 04 02:03p B~ Watt Mali INBOX Fwd Fwd.~'"Way blvd 905 403 0566 - p.2 Page 1 of2 ee ~ 0 lQ P a1.e Q V' ~ JnbS'lI Iimpty Tr"sh Compose Eoldel"5 .5e;!rch Qptlons jjelp .fl,ddress book Filters Oose ~Indow It:: INBOX Otlen folder Quota status 542MB /7 OCMB en 41 %) INBOX: Fwd: Fwd: 850 bayway blvd (1 of 49) 81 Mar1<. as Move I Copy ThIS message to Delete I Reply I Reply: to "III Forward I Redirect I Message source I S,,!!e as I Print Date Thu, 10 Jun 200410 34 53 -0700 (pOT) From susanwatl@canada com To bamey@fido ca Subject Fwd Fwd" 850 bayway blvd Headers Show All Headers ijack to INBQX c:. po Start of forwarded message SubJect Fwd 850 bayway blvd Fron susanwatt@canada.com Date. Wed, 09 Jun 2004 17 08 09 -0700 (PDT) To mlKe reyno1ds@~yclearwater com ------- Start of forwarded message ------- Suo)ect. 850 bayway blvd From s~sanwatt@canada com Date Tue, 08 Jun 2004 13 31 17 -0700 (PDT) To mlke reyrolds@myclearwater com Mlke Please pass on to the Development ReVlew Comrnlttee, my adamant Ob)ectlon to the proposed development of 850 Bayway Blvd It lS completely out of charachter for the bay shoreli~e, It's far too large for tho lot Slze, and It's too hlgh It would be a bllght along the water's edge WhlCh has no bUlld~ngs h~gher than 4 stories A~ re~~dents of Clearwater Po~nt, we are ent~tled to tne qULet en)oymen~ of our homes We are also ent~tled to Our VLeW across the Bay, to the protectlon of the val~e of our homes a~d to that qulet enJoyment unlnterupted by, perhaps, years of construct~on, dlrt, and no~se outs~de our wlndows RECEIVED Clearwater Beach is a natural paradise for all people, not Just for the very wealthy The city planners must not approve the kLndS of proposals that adversely affect so many eXLstLng homeowners many of whom are t~e senLor c~t~zens of Clearwater POlot who'~e paLd their taxes (or years and years We must prevent Clearwater Beach from becoml.ng a haven for developers to get rlc..h, grab thelr rooney, and run -- leavlcg hundreds of res~dents adversely affected JUN 1 0 200~ PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Please enVlSl.On how r~dlculous one bu~lding 100mlng 50 - 60 feet above the others wl11 look And to the boat traffLc.. to Clearwater Marlna, thlS prolect wlll look Just plai~ ugly the rew townhouse developments on Bayway Blvd -- Just up the street -- are the type of hnp Ilwww fido calmmlhmp/message php':lindex=3860 611 012004 Yours very SlTIcerely Susan Watt Homeowner, Clearwater POLot PS Would you please send me a copy of the notes from the meetLng My fax ~s 905 403-0566 End of forwarded message End of forwarded message Qelete I Reply J Rep III to a III Fo rwa rd I Red lreel I Messa 9 e sou rce I Sa'![e a s I PrI!!t Mark as Move I Copy This message 10 Back to IN60X - t> Jun 10 04 02:05p 8arnr Mall: INBOX' Fwd Fwd: 850 905 40'" '1566 Watt NdY blvd prOJect WhlCh should be allowed on the south beach water's edgl'!.' .) Please deny thl-S outrageous proposal for B50 Bayway Blvd; or at the very least, modify the plans to conform to the archltecture and helght scape of the ex~stl-ng shore propertles Yours very S1ncerely Susan Watt Homeowner, Clearwater POlnt PS Would you please send me a copy of the notes from the meeting My fax ~s 905 403-0566 ------- End of forwarded message ------- ------- End of forwarded message ------- Qelete I Reply I Reply to alii Forward I Redirect I Message source 1 Saye as I Print Mark as Move I Copy ThiS message to http-//www,fido ca/mailhmp/message php?index""3860 p. 1 Page 2 of2 ~ck to INBOX ~<t> 6/10/2004 ,> l ~'.;tle~arwater t- I :-",,-=- o TO: FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE., 2nd Floor CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 0.1l-f.? k e..;-.ev /~, /J.~- 'or" /JA/ J5 "..e.r , r ?~ 2-<-- 0'1- z- tf ,f71 FAX. Phone: }'ROM: /l111~ /~/U fc/J Phone: 72 7-J' '2- ~rJt DATE: 9 -I J- () l.( SUBJECT: rt-/./ 700 'f - c1 Yo 2- b MESSAGE: J}LL ~~ .e'-/71&i;1 tA1i/V~d.A/~_ NUM-SER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) 3 Page 1 of 1 f" ~ Reynolds, Mike RECEUtED From: Genl67@aol com Sent' Saturday, September 11, 2004 1 17 PM To: Reynolds, Mike Cc: MAGBERNFLA@peoplepccom Subject: 850 Bayway Blvd SEP 1 3 2004 PlANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER It seems allowances to height, distance of bUilding from street, etc were all determined wIthout any notification to the neighbors It seems heights of bUildings IS an adJustlble Issue without regard to surrounding area What about parking for the proposed bUilding? What about the Issue of resIdents of the new bUilding assuming that they are entitled to use the facIlities of Clearwater POint I understand there IS no sWImming pool planned for the new bUilding Overall It seems that the planned bUilding WIll jam the property to the breaking pOint What IS the purpose of 6 motel rooms? More traffic? More transIents In and out? It seems to me that our elected officials are not taking Into account the best Interests of the majonty of residents of Clearwater POint Robert & Janet Gobeil GenI67@AOLCOM 9/13/2004 Page 1 of 1 Rey:nolds, Mike . I , ' RECElllED From T JBrady [tjbrady@totallnk net] Sent: Saturday. September 11,20041256 PM To Reynolds, Mike Subject: Chart House SEP 1 3 2004 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF OLlARVVATIR Mr Reynolds, Please enter our objections Into the record regarding the conversion of The Chart House to a condominium and hotel We object to exceeding the 35 foot rule thus opening the door for future developers to do the same thing We are concerned that we Will need to heighten our security at our pools @ Clearwater POint because of the fact that the renovations to 850 Bayway do not call for a pool We also object to the developers adding to the eXisting height of the bUilding, Sincerely Thomas J and Barbara J Brady 855 Bayway 9/1312004 (<~ ~ I' I -~ " ~ :~~~/:l- :ij~"'";1 ~a- { rwater ' I = i ,~' I ii' >- '~,,::=I' ,-L~ I I- II I I III ~ u TO: FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE., 2nd Floor CLEARW A TER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 f<.--(-H, ~ Me 7 1";J .-' ?rdJ- J~;-/ J(dZIUI.eO.M/ J-~1-- r2-2-~ FAX: Phone: FROM: fit,lCe /ltz.y /fA ( dr p-/ /-6'1 SUBJECT: Phone: Vb 2 ~ VtFJC ;:it:J 06Y -6V' 0 2b tit S?-> ~.PY w47 tJ Lt/ 4 DATE: MESSAGE: cI'~i! a~..A/..d ~/LC ../H-AS dA A:f~~./ /!;-:d,~-'~--hX,{) f}(;'::yv~~-~2~~ Z-/t:. Z' /;4't"U''71/..rr'~ ~ A 4' ~ .L d/ /~../-.A!.-yvv ~ / Au, (/ - ~ .. .J It) A/I1 / ... -- NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) y , 2:~pm , Case Number: FLD2004-Q4l",___ -- 850 BA YW A Y BLVD Owner(s), Decade PropertIes Inc DRAFT N 19 W24130 RI verwood Dr # 1 00 Waukesha, WI 53188 TELEPHONE No Phone, FAX No Fax, E-MAIL No Emad ApplIcant Jeff Kelerleber 240 Bayslde Dnve Clearwater, Fl 33767 TELEPHONE 727-461-2921, FAX 262-522-8999, E-MAil.. No Ema.1 LocatIOn: North side of Bayway Boulevard, approximately 600 feet east of the mtersectlOn of Gulf Boulevard Atlas Page 285B Zonmg Distract: T, TourIst Request' Comprehensive 1nfill Redevelopment Approval for 13 attached residential Units and SIX sUites (mixed use development) With a bmldmg heIght of 49 feet (above the FEMA hne) plus roof appurtunences, and a front setback reductIOn from 15 feet to 6 03 feet (to pavement) Proposed Use: Mixed use Neighborhood Clearwater Pomt Assoclation(s): TELEPHONE No Phone, FAX No Fax, E-MAIL No EmUl! Neighborhood Clearwater Beach Association(s): TELEPHONE No Phone, FAX No Fax, E-MAIL No Emad Presenter: Mike Reynolds, Semor Planner Attendees Included: Chip Gerlock, Mike Reynolds, Scott Rice, RIck Albee, Joseph Colbert The DRe reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineermg: 1 1) Need to show stagmg area for dumpster 2) Quemg space for egress IS only 20 ft , how does the gate operate? 3) Need to core eXlstmg samtary sewer manhole for sewer connectIon 4) The eXlstmg water mam shown on Sheets 3 and 6 of 10 IS 6" not 5" diameter 5) Need to connect proposed fire hydrant, fire Ime serVice, etc to the eXlstmg 6" water mam 6) Show tappmg sleeve and valve note at eXlstmg mam tap 7) What are fire hne and hydram connectmg to? 8) Where do guests park? All of the above to be addressed prIor to CDB PrIor to C 0 1) Need to record the condommum plat With Pmellas County EnVironmental: 1 See Stormwater Comments Fire' Development ReVIew Agenda - Thursday, August 12,2004 - Page 29 t' Fife Department LU1IDectlons shall be IdentIfied by a sign that state~ . fo Parkmg, Fue Department ConnectIOn" and shall be designed m accordance With Flonda Department of TransportatIOn standards for mformatlOn slgnage and be mamtamed With a clearance of 7 Y.z feet m front of and to the sIdes of apphance As per Flonda Fire PreventIOn Code, 200 I Edition, modificatiOn to Section 3-5 6 of NFPA 1 Please acknowledge mtent 10 comply PRIOR TO BLDG PERMIT 7/21104 LC Acknowledge that thIS will be done 2 FIre Alarm System mstallatiOn must be m accordance With NFPA 72, 1999 Edltion by a hcensed Fire Alarm Contractor under separate plans and permit PRIOR TO BLDG PERMIT 7121104 J_C Acknowledge that thiS will be done 3 Provide drawmgs that have been prepared by or under the dIrectiOn of an Engmeer registered under Chapter 471 F10nda Statutes for the Fire Alarm System as per FlOrIda BUlldmg Code 2001 Edition, SectIOn 104 4 1 3 (5) Drawmgs shall be signed and sealed by a ProfessIOnal Engmeer as per 471 025 FlOrIda Statutes PRIOR TO BLDG PERMIT 7121104 J_C Acknowledge that thiS wdl be done Engineers signed and sealed drawmgs must be a part of the construction documents 4 Provide draWings that have been prepared by or under the directIOn of an Engmeer registered under F S Chapter 471 for all fire spnnkler systems as per FlOrIda Buddmg Code, 200 1 EditIon, Sec 104 4 1 3 Drawmgs shall be sIgned and sealed by a Professional Engmeer as per F S 471025 The mstallatJon shall be m accordance With NFPA 13, 1999 Edition by a hcensed Fire Spnnkler Contractor under separate permit With drawmgs Please acknowledge PRIOR TO BLDG PERMIT 7121/04 J_C Acknowledge that thiS will be done The Engmeers SIgned and sealed plans must be a part of the construction documents 5 Provide portable Fue ExtmgUlshers listed for Class A, Class B and Class C fires that meet the reqUIrements of NFPA 10, must be mstalled at the plerlland mtersectlOn Additional Fire ExtmgUlshers must be placed on the dock so that the maximum travel distance to an ExtmgUlsher does not exceed 75 feet As per NFPA 303, Fire ProtectIOn Standard for Mannas and Boat yards, Section 4 22 1 6 All reqUIrements of NFP A 303, Fire ProtectIOn Standard for MarInas and Boat yards must be met PRIOR TO BLDG PERMIT 7121/04 J_C Acknowledge that thIS wIll be done 7 ProvIde a Standpipe water supply With 2 112 mch connection & 1 112 mch adaptor wIth breakable cover and cham wlthm 100 feet of any Pler/land mtersectlOn As per NFP A 303, Fire Proteclion Standard for Marmas and Boat yards, SectIOn 4 34 PRIOR TO CDB 7121104 J_C Not shown wuhm 100 feet of both docks 8 Cloud all reVISions 7/21/04 J_C The reVised plan was submitted Without any c10udmg Future submIttal revISIons must be clouded, PLEASE 9 Plans submItted for Fire ReView must reflect adherence to F10nda Fue PreventIOn Code, 2001 EdItion and the followmg Codes NFPA 101,2000 EditiOn, NFPA 70,1999 Edltlon and FlOrIda Statute 633 Show on a Code Reference Sheet 7121104 J_C FlOrIda Fife Prevention Code must be referenced m the applicable codes list 10 ***PLEASE N01E*** REVIEW AND APPROV AL BY THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION SHALL NOT RELEIVE THE APPLICANT OF THE RESPONSIBILITY OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE 2001 EDITION Harbor Master: No Comments Legal: No Comments Land Resources: 1 7127/04-Reduce the sIze of retention pond "A" to preserve the Pme trees, enlarge retention pond "B" to recover the lost volume 5124/04-If a water quality pond IS to be IDstalled, recommend placmg It at the east Side of the bUilding to aVOId the pme trees at the west SIde See reVised comment above Landscaping: I lrngatlon must meet the City Code per Section 3- 1203 C, submit plans pnor 10 CDB to show 100% coverage, ram sensor, automatic timer, etc Development ReView Agenda - Thursday, August 12,2004 - Page 30 I ," Parks and Recreation: 1 Open Space and Recreation Impact Pees are due pnor to Issuance of bUlldlDg permits Please contact Deb RIchter at 727-562-4817 Stormwater: I I The site IS exempt from storm water attenuatIOn and only has to proVide water quality retentlOn PrlOr to CDB this area should be shown on the site plan MET 2 PrIor to bulldmg permit a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit IS to be proVided Solid Waste: 1 That dumpster service be arranged with the Solid Waste Department prIor to the Issuance of an occupatIOnal license or certificate of occupancy Please contact Tom Glenn - 727-562-4930 7/26/04 Dumpsters and recychng bIOS wdl be rolled out by condo maIDtenance employees Traffic Engineering: I I Show dimenSIOns on Site plan for typical regular and disabled parkmg space also dnve aIsle wldths (CommunIty Development Code Sectton 3-1402) 2 Include current city of Clearwater disabled parlang space and disabled sign detail 3 Turning radIUS Inside garage must be able to accommodate a car turnmg comers WIthout gomg over the other lane or backIDg up 4 Garage supports such as walls must not Impair dnver's Sight VISIbility when backmg out of parkmg space (Community Development Code Section 3-1402) DeSign walls such that the driver can see when baclang out (see Belle Harbor) 5 Parkmg garage must have a vertical clearance of 82" per Chapter! 1 Plonda BUlldmg Accesslblhty Code, SectIOn 11-4 6 5 6 All of the above to be addressed prIor to C D B 4 5 6 7 Other. No Comments Notes. ThiS applicatIOn IS suffiCient There are some outstandmg lssues that are expected to be addressed through plan reVISIon by August 19,2004 Other Issues are to be addressed by deadlines per staff comments Planning: 1 Color bUlldmg elevatIons, With dimenSions show from BFE to roof mldpomt (use dimensIOnal arrows) need to be prOVIded for each elevatIOn Label the elevatIOn for each sheet ConSider ehmmatmg the request for a front setback reduction The site plan shows bUild 109 height at 48 feet from BFE to roofmldpomt The application form states the height to be 49 feet Please correct whichever amount IS iD error How Will parkmg be deSIgnated, as there IS one short for the hotel portIOn? PrOVide color elevations, all four SIdes, for thiS proposal How WIll parkmg function for the hotel versus the condommlUms? How IS the site accessed for the hotel and condomiDlUm uses? 2 3t Development ReView Agenda - Thursday, August 12,2004 - Page 31 " ". , !::H ID II,IG REPORT Rug. 11 2004 02 24PM YOUR LOGO YOUR FAX NO Clt~OfClearwater-Plan Dept 727 562 4865 NO OTHER FACSIMILE 01 97939855 START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT Aug 11 02:21PM 02'32 SND 04 OK m TIJRN OFF REPORT. PRESS · MENU' **04. ll-lEN SELECT OFF BY US I NG · +. OR '-'. FOR FAX RDURNTRGE ASSISTANCE. PLEASE CALL 1--E100-+lE1....-FAX (435-7329). , \ ", '~EHD I HG REPORT Rug 11 2004 02:25PM YOUR LOGO YOUR FRX NO. Clt~OrClearwater-Plan Dept 727 552 4855 NO OTHER FRCSIMILE 01 912525228999 STRRT TIME USRGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT Rug. 11 02:25PM 01'34 SND 04 OK TO TIJRN OFF REPCRT, PRESS 'MBIU' ttel4. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALl.. 1-800-l-1B...P-FAX (435-7329). 1./ cj tJ ~1t 1 /11 ! J 0 13 A=1_4LA~ ~~k 1A;: : _/ j;l? -- ._~) tl~->t-f-l =-- --2~6 rJ? '&v# / -tMb- . ---- ~n --- --MJ)i ~jb!j!)~-j .-:-r- ). ! I ';/;4, L~~~0,- 1:1 -/LO~ "' I / -f1#1A- __/_Qi) -'. -- !l~ Z--7- '- or --- 0Ut: C~& '~ ~ LMk~ -MI1_ft; _ ~~.~ .. I'/, U/f. i~ - (~W fo/ - ~ /JO-f.A4 /~A~ ""\, ~ , ._~~-- ~-- ~ --- - ~ , 1 0i!-(;;~+~ -----~~ I t? I (./"" 6!L-- ~ t-u::::./ -~ , , .,..-- --.-= -------- -~ - -...~~--. f I I ---+----~- - I I , I -i-...--- , r~-- - , SEP-18-e4 12:1217 AM SGROI ELECTRIC 718 ">92 795121 ~ p.e1 I ( I I ~ ~ f RECEIVED 1. , SFP ? A 2004 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF ClEARWATER TO:FRANK GERLOCK SEPTEMBER 17, 2004 FAX 727 562-4865 , , , .' " { J' , '< tROM ANN & GERALD SGROI N.Y.# 516 484-3879 830 SOUTH GULFVIEW BLVD.S. CLEARWATER, FL.33765 SAILMASTER UNIT# 803 ~E: DECADE PROPERITES INC. 850 BAlWAY BLvD. CLEARWATER, FL. LOTS 3,14,& lS.FLD2004-04026 . .' WE ARE OWNERS AT 830 SOUTH GULFVIEW BLVD., AND WE STRONGLY REQUEST THAT THIS PROPOSAL OF A MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL & OVERNIGHT ACCOMMODATIONS BUILDING NOT BE ALLOWED FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: j, ~p ~ 1. IT WOULD CREATE MORE TRAFFIC, WHICH RESIDENTS ARE ALREADY ENDURING TOO MUCH TRAFFIC. 2.THEY WANT TO HAVE TaE BUILDING OVER FOUR STORIES, WHICH WILL BE UNSIGHTLY. 3.THEY ALSO WANT TO BUILD ONLY SIX fEET FRO~ THE PAVEMENT. OF NOISE. 4.IT WOULD ALSO CREATE EXTREME AMOUNT THIS aUILDING IS NOT WITHIN OUR BEST INTEREST. OU~ VOTE IS AGAINST T>>IS PROPOSAL. THANK YOU FOR YOUR HELP! SINCERELY, a-..fr ' ANN 'SG 01 h-t'~~1~' '/;1~()'f GERALD SIT DATE I f J f I / , l , I' , eo' Sep 20 04 OS:55a Barnr- Watt 905 4r 0566 p.l tChck h\:re and type address) facsimile transmittal RECEIVED To' Frank (Chip) Gerlock Fax. From Susan Watt Date Re' Objections to the redevelopment Pages appltcatlOn for 850 Bayway Blvd Case # FLD2004-04026 cc. SEP 2 0 2004 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CilY OF CLEARWATER 72..7 - 5&.::L - Lf 'i:Cr. S 912012004 6 pages mcludmg cover o Urgent o For RevIew o Please Comment (!f Please Reply o Please Recycle . . . . . . . . . Please find attached my request for party status, the request for a delay for the heanng on Sept 2], and objections to the proposed project Would you please call me at 905 403 9369 to verify that you have receIved this fax and that you Wlll present it to the Development ReVlew Commlttee Regards, Susan Watt ~~tl-~ .... III It........ ..... ....,............... ... J Sep 20 0'4 09:SSa BarnE'~ Watt 90S 4('~ OS66 p.2 1566 Spnng Road Mississaug~ ON L5J 1 N3 RECE'VED September 17,2004 SEP 2 0 200~ PLANNING DEPARTMENT em OF ClEARWATER Re Case Number FLD2004-04026 The Development Review CommIttee must reject this proposal for 850 Bayway Blvd Clearwater Point is a residential area, Many owners bve here full-time; others are seasonal. But we are a commumty of neighbors, some of whom have known each other for more than 20 years. We all bought our homes trusting that the city would enforce Its O\m zoning guidelmes, especially when not doing so would have such a negative impact on us No valid reason has been shown for the Development Review Committee to approve the proposed development Indeed, the city must not make the kinds of decISIons that adversely affect so many of its CItIzens. As residents of Clearwater POint, we are entitled to the qUiet enjoyment of our properties We are also entItled to have the city protect our property values. The purpose oftlus letter is three-fold, to request 'party status' as a resident Wltlun 200' of the proposed project See (A) below. to request a delay for this heanng for the reasons listed below (B); and to object 10 the project on the grounds listed below (C) A) PARTY STATUS Mr Frank Gerlock, Development Review Manager, assured me in our telephone conversatIOn on Friday September 1 7. 2004, that my request in WIlting for party status wIll be recognized As an owner of a property which IS WIthm 200 feet of the subject redevelopment, I am hereby requesting such party status B) HEARING DELAY Thts heanng should be delayed for the following reasons: I) As the Development Review Committee generally approves the applications it reviews. those who are opposed to the proposal must have a chance to be heard 2) In this instance, not enough time was given to prepare for thiS meetmg. Far too many residents of Clearwater Pomt are still unaware of It, and many are unable to attend on such short notice. To make a decision that adversely affects hundreds and hWldreds of reSidents while not allowing them time to attend the meetmg 1S unreasonable. of , Sep 20 04 09:5Sa Barne l&Jatt 905 4r- 0566 p.3 3) The state of Florida encouraged people to leave the area because afthe threat of the hurricanes Many residents left, are still away, and therefore haven't seen then recent maIl- which includes the notice of tills meeting. 4) In the business days prior to the meetmg, Mr. Michael Reynolds AICP Planner III, the author of the report which has recommended approval, had to attend a funeral of a farntly member, and was thereby unavailable for communicatIon with the public C) OBJECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT The proposed project must be denied because the planning comrmttee's report IS flawed. First. The property in question is not slffiply a hotel as stated 1ll the report. In fact, Chart House SUites/Clearwater Bay is presently a Time Share [Resort Condommiums InternatIOnal (ReI) #4316J SO the proposed 'residential' units could really be Time Share tmits - an entlrely different proposition Second, The report states that "the proposed front setback and bmldmg height increase are necessary in order to fit the proposed" application Instead, the proposal itself should fit existing zoning codes. Thud (Please see attached - the Clearwater Planning Deparbnent Staff Report. Case Number, FLD2004-04026; Agenda Ite~ F, Owner, Decade Properties, pages 3 and 4) On page 3 of the report under ~COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA (SectIOns 2-803), numbers I, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, although listed as 'consistent' are, in fact, 'inconsIstent' , For number 1. A practical development plan which doesn't deVl8te from the use, intensity and development standards could easily be designed, For number 2. The development will reduce the fair market value of the abutting and ad] acent propertIes; For number 4 The use or mix of uses is not compatible with adjacent land use For number 5. The development will not upgrade the immediate vicimty; it will detract from the Immedl8te vicmity For number 6 The deSign (including the variances) does Dot create a form and function that enhances, indeed, it deprecIates the immediate vicimty " Sep 20 d4 09:56a Barnr- Watt 905 4" 0566 p.4 For number 7 FlexibIlIty in regard to lot width, required setbacks, and height are not justified because they will not benefit the community character and immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed. On page 4 of the report under 'COMPLIANCE WlTH GENERAL STANDARDS (Section 3-913), nwnbers 1,2,5, and 6 although listed as 'consIstent' are, in fact, 'Inconsistent' For number 1. The development of the land will not be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage and character of the adjacent properties. (Every shorelme building to Clearwater Point complies with the 35 foot standard) For number 2. The development will significantly impair the value of much of the adjacent land and bUlldmgs. (ThIs decrease in value for surrounding properties is self-evident.) For number 5 The development is inconsistent with the community character of the IInmedlate VICInIty. (All water's edge propertIes along Bayway Blvd. - mcluding the brand new townhouses - comply with the 35 foot standard.) For number 6 The design of the proposed development does not minimize adverse effects, mcluding ViSUal, acoustic and hours of operation Impacts on adjacent properties Therefore, on page 4 of the report under 'Bases for Approval' 1. The proposal does not comply With the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment project per SectIOn 2-803 C 2. The proposal is not in compliance with other standards in the Code inc1udlOg the General Applicability Cntena per SectIon 3-913 3 The development is not compatible with the surroundlOg area. Indeed, it will be the only water's edge bwldmg that wIll be over the legal 35 foot allowance on Clearwater Point, Devon Dr, Brightwater Dr and Bayside Dr. all of WhICh present the view for all boat traffic going to Clearwater Manna It will loom above all other shore properties. In conclusion, the Development Review Committee must deny this request for variances for the aforementIOned reasons To allow a developer to explOIt an opportnnity at the expense of hundreds of Clearwater Point's reSIdents - most of whom are senior CItizens who have been law- abIding taxpayers for years and years - would be unconscIOnable Yours truly, ~""-. }"..;L J ". ;' ,. ... r t,.",",- ...... --- Susan Watt Y506. Clearwater pomt c, Sep 20 D4 09:~6a Barr> ' Watt 905 " 1 0566 APPEl\JDIX 1 P~.GE .,j IL Section. z-ae3.9:_~ ._____.. ,..-...._01- 1 The dnel.opnumt or redevelopment of the parcel pl'oposed fur development is o1herwise impractical witboul deviations from the use, in . and devel standards ~ ~ The developmen1 of the parcel proposed fbr development as a Comprebeosive InfiU Redevelopment Project will not reduce tbe fair market value of abuttlD . es 3. The uses wittun the Comprehensive InfiI1 Redevelopment Project are otb.erWJse mitted in the Cit of Clearwater l 4:' Too use or mix of uses Within the Comprehens1ve Infill Redevelopment " Pr . eet is ~!'1to!t: wi!h ~~ ~ uses. -5 The development of the parcel proposed for development, as a CompreheDsive Infill Redevelopment Project wiD upyrade the Immediate vicini~,!d' ~~~ce~ I!~ for devel nt 6 The design of the proposed ComprebeDMve InfilJ Redevdopment Project creates a form and fimction that enhances the community character of the immediate vicimty of the parcel proposed for .f ......_~ .!ievelopment and the City of Oearwater ,9 a whole ! '1 ' Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, hetgbt and off- __ .. street parking are Justified by the benefits to community clmracter and li the unmed1ate vicuUty of the parcel propoBed for developtnent and the C' of Clearwater as a whole 8 Adequate off~street parlcins in the immediate vicinity aceordmg to the shared parking formula In Divi&ion 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for deve!opmeDt p.5 CODdde1lt Jm:OIIlIiPlkJ:lt X x x x x x x x , Sep 20 04 09;S6a Barn--' Watt 90S'" -"1 0566 p.6 APPENDIX 1 cent PAGE 4 ~ 1, "- 2' oJ '- 3 4. ,5 I 6. G Secdoa 3-913 i Cow_nelll fluaaekteat Development of the land will be in bannony with the :scale. bUik:" X and cbaractea- of . acent . os. Development will DOt hinder Or discourage development and use of X ad acent land and buildings or sigoificanUy UnpalC the value the.rec;d" Development win not adversely atfect the health or safety of persons X resid' or workin in the aei ad. Develo 15 d' to minimize traffic co 00. X Development is consistent with the community character of the X Immediate vicJm . Design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, X including visua~ acoustic and olfkctory and hours of operation i aclS on ad"acent . SUMMARY AND RJ.COMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee reviewed the appliCltion and supporting materials at Its meeting 00 August 18, 2004. The Planning Dep4rtment recommcods APPROVAL of the Flexible Development application of a mixed use development fur 13 multi-flunily residential units and azx hotel units WIth a reduction of the front (south) setback. along Bayway Boulevard. from 15 feet to 603 feet (to pavement), and a buildins height increase from 35 feet to' 49 feet from base flood elevation (plus roof appurtenances), as a CottIp.FehooJive Infill Redevelopment Project, under tbe proYiswns of Section 2~803 C with the folloWlDg ba:ieS and conditions' ~ Bales for Aoproval: 1 The propoul compliea with the FIeJdble I)e;.leiopment criteria as a Comprehe.nstve lnaD Redevelopment Project pet SectIon 2-803 C 2 The proposal is in cornp1iaace with other standards in the COdo including 1he General Applicability emma per Section 3.913 3 The development is compatible with the SWTOUnding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts Conditions of A,p,proval. t That the final design and color of the building be consutan wlth the conceptual elevatiODS submitted to, or as modified by, the CDS, 2 That all FICe Department requirements be met prior 10 the issuance of any building permits, 3. That the National Fire Protection AssoCIation (NFP A) 303 standards for ~ariDas and boatyards" be met to the satisfaction of the Fire Department prior to the wuance of any building permiu, 4, That aD Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the isauaooe of any building pernutS; 5, That dumpster service with the City of Clearwater be ar:rafIged prior to budding pennit issuance, 5" That the inigation plan &beet be revised to the ,atisfaction of City Planning Staff. prior to any building permit iasuaoce; 7. That all storm water, water, and Be\Ver design standards of the Engineering Department be met prior buiIdmg pennit iSBuance, Staff Report - Coulmt1Ilily JlMdopmc:tIt BlmJd - SI:ptlmlbur 2). 2004 . ClIsc FJ..D2004..04026 - Page 4 ~ ~ -- - -... ..~-- r-~~ .':211 .("U..]...,......J ~d=n uPI~~~~~Fdl'jn~\I~= ~~ .' RECEIVED SEP 14 2004 OFFICIAL R LEGISLA.TlV/;i/v,RDS AND CS DEPT LEILA G CONNOR ShIpmaster House 800 South Gulfvlew Blvd Clearwater, FL 33767 Tel 727-447-6510 ORIGINAL Chairperson, Clearwater Commumty Development Board c/o CIty Clerk Cynthia E Goudeau POBox 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 In Re Proposal for Redevelopment of 850 Bayway Boulevard Your case # FLD2004-04026 "ll - - Dear S.r or Madam r I am In receIpt of your notice of a hearmg m thIs matter' sehedule'd' for SeptemBer \ } I ~ t, ~ ~ I l.... I 21,'2004 My husband and I, as resIdents of'Clearwater Pomt strenuously'object to thIs proposal' It IS our mtentlon to appear at the hearing , state our objectlon.s and request party status We expect to be jomed my many of our hke-mmded neighbors at the heanng We received tins notIce on September 7,2004 Along with three other neighbors we made an appomtment to speak with Frank Gerlock on Thursday, September 9,2004 at I 00 pm Mr Gerlock met wIth us very bnefly but was unable to spend much tIme wIth us becau&e he was mvolved wIth some hearmgs or meetmgs When we spoke, we explamed that many of the large numbers ofresldents of ClearWater Pomt were not ill resIdence at thIs time and that, to our knowledge, many had not even receIved the reqUired notice at that hme We suggested that a delay m the heanng mIght be appropnate to allow enough time for the notice to reach mterested parties and for them to be present at the heanng, but he stated that that would be Impossible We were referred by Mr Gerlock to Mr MIchael Reynolds who wasn't' expectmg us and had only twenty mmutes to spend WIth us We reque'ited copIes of certaIn mateiials'm lis file 'and he agree-Ii to have'them copied and'avaIlable dn the next day We also made an appomtInerit to meet WIth him'on Monday,! September 13,2004' Unfortunate! y, because of humcane Frances, receIpt of the notIce was delayed, partIcularly when It Involved forwardmg out of state We are now faced With the prospect of hum cane Ivan and many of us wIll be travehng out ofhann's way thIS weekend WIth no hkelIhood of a return untIl the danger has passed We have had to cancel our meetlllg with Mr Reynolds and wIll be unable, as we had llltended, to meet With FlorIda legal counsel for advice relatIve to our objectIOns to thIS proposal Furthermore, the copies of documents from the file wmch had been promIsed for Fnday were unavailable because the copier had apparently broken down I would, therefore, on behalf of my husband, myself and many of our concerned neighbor.'>, respectfully request a short delay of two or three weeks for thIS heanng That would ensure that all affected parties would receIve notice and that we would have tIme to prepare appropriately for the heanng ~ I have, as of thl.'> date, sent a copy of thIS letter to the local address of Decade Propertles,Ine I thank you m advance for your anticipated cooperatIOn Very truly yours, ~~~~ Leila G. Connor Cc Decade Properties, Inc 240 Bayslde Dnve Clearwater, FL 33767 ~ Au OR1G"~ lrL~~__..__4C~i?"'_..__ __ u1 JU ~;c;(;J~~ -"~-~~~~7 dr-d~_~ ~~____ a.i1J~:J;jU--~L~T-4N ~u _ _, __ _ .' -- - ~"rT-~~ ~~ ~~-~-jV\~~~~ ~ ....__..~ ~, ~. - --~---- - . 'u .._0!J..l'-{]):eL<-aJ_~~~_~_ ~_D-L~_ F---~------- ~~. _~--~-~_r::L-_tM.JLJ ....._ o-0U ~_26'..u ~ ~_~.., ,~" ' __w_ ~-~=----~~(\~~,,:--~~ ~f ----- -- -7/1_'~- TYJ .~J:i&b_7V -,-d~-- --~-I'Ur-r~ wr-1ii) Lftl-~p-Ir ;;\~11.Jlj _~"'aflO uft · .. " " ~~E~~P~!D \\..I;7l=1 \Y ~1b:V S~P--l~8-2004 r~r\ n\: l'\" ~ ~JL:ry.A~j (lli=~~r "'t.' ..\....." .'.J=J :0i. U ~v..;,. C~iiV or C~EA~~'VATlER liirID~~~1 J:Lkll-l' ~ i;::' ~T'l~- Wj - -~1MJIi VTr,. , . . " --. . , N!CHOU.S j LAGA7TUTA JOEL J DEGRAZIA MA7THEW C MASON Cl~IGINAL LAGATTUTA DEGRAZIA & MASON, P.c. Attorneys at Law SCHAUMBURG CORPORATE CENTER J 5 J 5 WOODFfELD ROAD SUITE 880 SCHAUMBURG, IL 60173 fiLE FIRM 847/240-5500 FAX 847/240-5825 rl ~ ~ @--reW~- un Sfi' J 8 2l!lI% ~ PlANNI NT' OS C'fY 0 ~ ClEARWATER V September 10, 2004 Via Facsimile (727) 56~-4865 and Regular Mail Mr Mike Reynolds Clearwater Commumty Development Board 100 South Myrtle Clearwater, Flonda 33756 Re Public Board Heanng - September 21, 2004 850 Bayway Blvd Cl.earwater, Flonda Mr Reynolds - I am wntmg with regard to the above-capttoned matter I own a condommmm at 851 Bayway Boulevard and my parents have owned one m the same bUIldmg for the last twenty-five (25) years This IS directly across the street from the proposed new constructIon Over the last five (5) years we have seen Clearwater Beach become over- developed We are m favor of change and growth when It IS good In thIs case, It is not good A couple of examples of the problems the over-buildIng has caused have been magOlfied with the roundabout and the bndge leadmg onto Clearwater Beach Both of these disasters were directly caused from the congestIOn as a result of the new developments The "Beach" cannot handle any more people or congestion the new developments have created What used to take fifteen (15) mInutes to get on and off the beach now takes up to nmety (90) mInutes m a distance ofless than five (5) mIles , ( There are so many cars now on the beach that It IS no longer safe to dnve I am sure the number of accidents on Clearwater Beach has gone up dramatically There IS no more land on the beach to develop It seems as though the CIty IS trymg to turn Clearwater Beach IOta the East Coast with all of Its hlgh-nses .~ - , I Letter to Mr Mike Reynolds September 10, 2004 Page Two The sign at the pier says that Clearwater Beach IS the number one beach In Flonda I used to believe It untd the over-development started The standards that made Clearwater Beach number one have been compromIsed The current condo and home- owners are suffenng while the developers are benefitmg With regard to the proposed bUlldmg at 850 Bayway Boulevard, there IS Just not enough room to butld more condos The yacht club brIngs traffic from the Bayway sIde and Leverocks bnngs traffic from the gulf sIde The residents at Clearwater Pomt are surrounded WIth mountmg congestIOn Because of the cul-de-sac, there IS no room for more congestion The additIOnal traffic IS unsafe for semors and mmor children ahke Can the land avadable at 850 Bayway sustam a bUlldmg as proposed by Decade Properties, Inc? I thmk not' WIth the traffic and safety Issues the proposed bUlldmg will create, It would not be prudent to grant the pennlt Please conSider the residents at Clearwater Pomt and the overall negatIve effect the new bUlldmg at 850 Bayway would have on the beach Please deny the permit to butld the forty-nme (49) foot bUlldmg Thank you for your consIderatIOn Smcerely yours, )LLLJ ~ NICHOLAS J LAGATTUTA ~ ... .- [t~~<<"~~~ n:;:,n \5 ~1h.~~U ~ J-,'1:JJ \iBr 1 4 1DD4 - -- c. ~~ ~~Sj1j\jS ~~PA~"lJ'~Jj~~l' '"" . ~\! Or- ('-1 'C: \\ ,"jii, II ~, .,i -'R v. J r v_;:nj"\\1"'r\~ C\ , " ~r.. ...-\ -" -. , ORIGINAL [;~L Ie Members of the Board Commuruty Development Board CIty of Clea.rv.rater 100 S Myrtle Ave Clearwater, Flonda 33758-4748 September 8,2004 RE' Harbour Watch, A CondommIumJRoss Yacht Parcel & eastern 60 feet of the Clearwater Manne Aquanum Parcel-Case # FLD 2004- 06042 Dear Members of the Board, The VIllage at Island Estates IS 10Gated at 240 "YVmdwaId Passage, Clearwater, FI 33767 whIch IS fee sImple tItle townhouse prOject to the northwest of the propostd Harbour Watch condoffil1llum project We h~ve met With Harbour Watch, LLC the developers of the Harbour Watch ProJect. and have revIewed the site plan and elevatIons for that project As neighbors on Island Estates and cItizens ofthe City of Clearwater, we belIeve that Harbour Watch would be a welcome addition to Island Estates We have no ObjectIOn to the maxim)lffi denSIty of 34 umts and do not belIeve that the City should Impose any commercIal component as part of the project Island Estates IS pnrnanly residential and the eXIstmg commercial adequately supports our reSIdential needs As a neIghbor, we appreCIate the fact that the Project WIll have two parkmg spaces per reSIdentIal umt .' We also agree that havmg adequate vlstas establIshed through setbacks supports havmg a taller and thmner bUIldmg and we support the developer's requef)t for a bUIldmg height between 85 feet to 110 feet The requested height IS certamly less than the surroundmg older projects which are rectangular and masSIVe Without the aesthetIc appeal oftIus project The proposed luxury condomInium IS certaInly a great Improvement over the eXlstmg use, WIll enhance the comdor to Clearwater Beach and prOVIde a much higher tax base than a commercIal or tranSIent use In addItIon the developer IS makmg a substantIal contnbutIon to the neIg..1)borhcod and the Clearwater Manne Aquanum by developmg the 100 easterly feet of the Clearnrater Aquanum and supportmg their efforts to beautIfy their parkmg area and bUlldmg as well as contnbutIng to the cost of their new slgnage and landscape buffer We encourage the Commurnty Development Board to vot~ III favor Ofthl~ project \ _ " _ :c ~, l_~, ".- ~ '," ","f " V~JY Truly Yours/J. I ~(V~, ~ j- Larmy Asner, President c: c: ml~Jl-( L?rzC;JA-.u 1 d/. , - - - . , ."'--~~...~ ~.. ~ tJ11 ~:~ 1!l, II .1-::;j , j I 1- -~ " I .' '! i -~~ ----~~. c" l I I. 1 , :. . '" I \' " I Ir"l \.u " ;" ~1 I. :::1:',.. , 'i I } L- ..J\ ~ " ~- t . f ,,' II t 1 ~ .... K--....~ ~ l:aoV ilt1:;l'ofti(,U:i~/1j~A I'l ,1 ~---- F:31'\I-!'f~1:J+~ ?t~', II;) ~~ I . ~~... f 11 :'l I , , c-} ~ ili ~.. '::. -- ~ ~...... --- ~[EC[E~V~lD SEP 1 6 2004 P&A~~~~G [)EPAR1MlE~T cnry OlF CLEARWATER .-............ !:l.~--1 ~ --= .......~... JAWla~110 ~ . , \ -~- ~ FILl; ORIGINAL Ron Wenn 851 Bayway Blvd Clearwater Beach, FL 33767 September 13, 2004 w SEP I 8 2oa~ ~ Mr Michael Reynolds City of Clearwater IOO S Myrtle Avenue PO Box 4748 Cleanvater, FL 33758-4748 PlAN j Dear Mr Reynolds, \ As resIdents of the Clearwater Pomt Condommmm Complex, we object to the approval of the new buddmg to be budt at 850 Bayway Blvd We feel that allowmg the structure to exceed the normal height restnctIOns and to reduce the normal setback opens the door to more vanatIons of the same kmd With other new constructIOn on Clearwater Beach Lllruts have been set m the past for good reason, and we beheve those hnuts should be honored Ifbudders contmue to get approval to go lugher and Wider With their new projects, where WlUlt end? The other objection we have has to do With the overall plan for this new buIldmg It IS hard to imagme beachfront property for reSidential and hotel uruts bemg bUllt Without allowmg for a swmunmg pool We feel tlus Will create a problem for us at our complex because we have three swmlITung pools on our property It IS already a difficult task to momtor these pools so that trespassers do not use our facihtIes We feel tlus new bUlldmg WIll defirutely Impact tlus problem for us at Clearwater Pomt by l11creasmg the number of people m our unmedlate vlcImty who would have reason to trespass Our final objection to the new butldmg IS the Issue of park mg HaVing more permanent residents bVlng on Bayway WIll mcrease the number of cars In the area We beheve that tlus Win make It more dIfficult for us m our complex to find adequate street parkmg as well We hope that you will conSIder our objectIons carefully We love Clearwater Beach and want to keep it a safe and happy place for reSidents and VISitorS alIke Thank you for your consideratIOn of our ObjectIons Smcerely, Ron Wenn ........ ,- J/t . ,~ -.1 ,-ulll, ~'IG1'I-~ . ! l ' \ ;t I \~l , :PI if' --..'C. ~ ,+<- . ,; \, ' .I I, l: .,;" (~r e':1l~, I:, I ~\ t ~ '1, \ ~~ (I) /~"i1iL ~ t ~ - ~ '. ~!\' \\/) " ",;ull;'-f;AfrJ')Ry"Y · C'".i'VV~ t ~~\-J.J.;.lIry.; l' B J ~ ~ '/' ~ "7J,,;ve,~ :~~~ a ~" ".. . ~ !..:=-....F>--..-._p- j... ........ , J "' J JA~1ic)If10 tl:;.1 rl: "J Ie"" t l I "---'I ~-..E.-;..L~ ",. ~ ~E:CEuVE[) . s~p 13 2DO~ P!lAlj\]\M~ J\1G DEPARTME[MT C~1Jlf Of CL1EAIRWATlER ", , . ~ " -, " 851 So Bayway Blvd l Apt 1 04 Clearwater Bch , FL 33767 727 -443-5625 September 15 l 2004 ORfGINAL Mr MIchael Reynolds City of Clearwater 100 S Myrtle Ave Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 Fill' - Dear Mr Reynolds I strongly object to the request by the developers of 850 Bayway (Chart House) to add to the eXisting height to make It the only waters edge bUilding on Clearwater POint whIch exceeds 35 feet I sImIlarly object to allOWing the developer to reduce the reqUired setback There are no motels at thIS end of Bayway Blvd and thiS IS a residential and very peaceful neighborhood for many many years It IS my understandIng that the developer's project does not Include a pool which means our faCIlities will be vulnerable and require more security Very truly yours, I t ~ [[-/nO, riO/ya ~ Elln Hagstrom ;f PlA C ___ . AlCR , ~ ,I ;;', " " I P j I JI"'\!I IV I ~, I.....J ' b!;l?,_1 ~...... l'__ 1" '; ,.. , ......., 1 , J ....-....... ,..,.-""~...-;I' ,--- , . ~ t _ I .! ~ ... ~ ! 1:11,1 :lu L --j} , - V'I~"" ,'!):.'.t,do l1rJO'-ltU.N:k', : :. "I'" .l.AJ.,,,,, , . "A..r'1',' t" I t ........,i"'.1.iT "'~!"~r'1}..j-."../" I Ii" t r ...,-w:p ".f~t l~ 1 \:~l~: . .J. R[2CE~V[Ero SEP 1 6 2004 Pl!A~t~~~~G DEPARrR~E~1 Cl1Y OF CLEARWATER !.f t.; {" ...... 544 W Wellington Ave Chicago, IL 60657 773-327 -4849 !IJJE '"-. September 14, 2004 ORI GINAL Mr Michael Reynolds City of Clearwater 100 S Myrtle Ave Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 Dear Mr Reynolds I am a winter resident at 851 So Bayway Blvd I strongly object to the proposed project at 850 So Bayway Blvd (Chart House) because of the negative Impact on the value of my property 1 object to the 35' rule, thus opening the door for future developers to do the same thing There are no motels on this end of ClealWater Beach ThIs IS a resIdential section and has been peaceful for many years At present there are no bUIldings on Bayway Blvd that are over 4 stones Why IS the city allowing this developer to be the exception? Very truly yours, 1d;g~ '\ \' Ih I " I I '! I, , ,- \ ~ .....~... 'r\' 4iC),"'r" i L~ ~j; t CJ I i~ t \ ; ~~~ ,Lfl~ RECE~VfED SEP 1 6 2004 PLANNING DEPARTMENT C!TY OF CLEARWATER , \ 4,,1. ...t~~, ,. . ( ~ ,I ~; , .. I .. ~ ~: 'ti 1 ~~~ l... .... ~----=r-=-~i-- ~ J'-(,':~ 1 'A :\tlAl:..t J~: \' ~ f .. \ \ \ "" ~-~~ll/-'i') "'IIl~#> ~.,. ~... :;. I f ~ ~ ~ '-l""", "'" t- " "-'j It. J ~ ORtG\~AL -0 ~(C~~ '. .Members of the Board l-eommumty Development Board City of CleaIWater 100 S Myrtle Ave Clearwater, Flonda 33758-4748 SEP 2 0 2004 "- DII PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF CLE;.\RWATER September 8, 2004 RE Harbour Watch, A CondommlUmlRoss Yacht Parcel & eastern 60 feet of the Clearwater Manne Aquanum Parcel-Case # FLD 2004- 06042 Dear Members of the Board, The VIlIa~e at Island Estates IS located at 240 Wmdward Passage, Clearwater, FI 33767 whIch IS fee SImple tItle townhouse project to the nonhwest oflhe plUpo:'cd Harbour Watch condommmm project We have met with Harbour Watch, LLC the developers of the Harbour Watch Project, and have reviewed the Site plan and elevations for that proJ ect As neighbors on Island Estates and Citizens of the City of Clearwater, we belIeve that Harbour Watch would be a welcome addItion to Island Estates We have no ObjectIOn to the maxImum density of 34 UnIts and do not belIeve that the CIty should Impose any commercial component as part of the project Island Estates IS pnmanly reSIdential and the eXistmg commercial adequately supports our reSIdentIal needs As a neighbor, we appreCIate the fact that the Project WIll have two parkmg spaces per reSIdential UnIt We also agree that havmg adequate vIstas establIshed through setbacks supports havmg a taller and thmner bUlldmg and we support the developer's request for a bUlldmg height between 85 feet to 110 feet The requested heIght IS certamly less than the surroundmg older projects which are rectangular and massive without the aesthetic appeal of this project The proposed luxury condommmll1 IS certamly a great Improvement over the eXlstmg use, will enhance the comdor to CleaIWater Beach and provIde a much hIgher tax base than a commercIal or tranSIcnt use In addItIOn the developer IS makmg a substantial contnbutlOn to the nelg..ltborhocd and the Clearwater Manne Aquanum by developmg the 100 easterly feet of the Clearwater Aquarium and supportmg their efforts to beautIfy their parkmg area and bUlldmg as well as contrIbutmg to the cost ofthetr new slgnage and landscape buffer We encourage the Commumty Development Board to vote III favor of thIS project VerYTrulYYour~ I' _f(V~ Lanny Asner, President \ I I I ,J ~~ nr, ~~ 1" + ~ J ..." r ti.f.\S 0 S 1'.\32 ~ ~ 1 .....1 I J !-~\ 11; J a.IRO , , r~ \'1:010'.1"'" ~'~l.r'\_,r' 1 If f;j);';J.J..j/J;CJ i/::J ~ V ~U .r '-'-.J:J ~ '1~ 1 n C l' .J,. I~' ,,/ r 'J' I r] _ I db,iJ\j~J .2.Q jI::.J~Lu 0. J .\IJ'J J ,Q ~Daz 0 Z d3S' r') ~IJ"', 1- J~r=ji~ ; ~ ........ 1.1. J --....J ~ -J '---' .. ~ '1' )1 \ , , 'r , \' , l't f tH."" ~ '<, \ . fl ; , ~ ~ ~-r~t ~ -- Ii ORIG\NAl -'--..-- l'O:~t~u~~ -0-' SEP20DM \ PlANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF CLEARWATER Michael Reynolds C/Clty of Clearwater 100 S Myrtle Ave Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758 Dear Mr Reynolds, We, Krystyna Rondo and Zblgnlew Sikora own the Unit 805 located at 855 Bay-way Blvd We have recently been Informed that there IS a proposed project to develop a property at 850 Bay-way Blvd I strongly object to this project, as It would severely Impact the value of my property From the looks of the plans, It appears that thIs would be a very large rental property, with the Units constantly changing hands We purchased a residential Unit, In a resIdential area, for the sole purpose of ItS peace and solitude Constructing a large motel In our area would create a nOise problem, would limit emergency access, and would compromIse secunty, which In turn would directly diminish the value of our property In additIon, we would like to protest this construction based on the violations of the zoning board's rules and regulations From what we understand, this proposed construction project would Violate the current rules by permitting the developer to erect his project at a height of 14 feet plus a roof over the current regulations Regulations are enacted for a purpose, and If the zOning board Will be arbitrarily varying from the rules that they themselves created, then there does not appear to be any reason for these rules whatsoever Why Will this developer be arbitrarily permitted to erect this property In variance to the codes? How Will thIs benefit anyone but hImself? We also understand that thIs developer has requested a variance not only on the height restriction, but also on the proximity of the property to the pavement Our neighborhood, as mentioned before, has always been reSidential, and placing large structures SIX feet from the pavement would slgmficantly reduce ItS suburban charm, and thus, Significantly reduce the value of our property It'S very hard to understand why anyone would be permitted to Simply Ignore the rules and regulations that have been for many years a main part of the enjoyment we have In our property For all of these reasons, we would like to reIterate, as an apartment owners, and loyal taxpayers, who would be strongly and negatively Impacted by this project We strongly object to the granting of this development , 011 Sincerely Yours, Krystyna Rondo and Zblgnlew Sikora ~~ ~~.h S#-~ , J: WDSOSqjz ..~ THi',lqOJ:-;, -, :J,.... .'" ,-,'1 ~ ,'"1'\,13 ~ !'nT',' ...,nV1.~ ... ~--- ....... ~ Jh!j1Ia~RO 'J - t""\I r- "t\ f'~ Q) ,( --', I~, '\ ' ~ r'~6\~IL'~u~; ~D S~p 2 0 200+ ,",'j I/' "\"'\"'\ 'r::> ' l-f \ , - ~ rr:e-i' ~""L r"""/\~".. "...."- ~ '-'~." i ,,\i 1 ~J V U ! .-'" f7 0r,:: C,) r:: Pol ~"Il fll'J:'r> . '''"'' /',~J':t-l.l"1:', ~/rdt't:;;:R n ... ..., " OR\GINAl Mr & Mrs A j Ilacqua 855 Bayway Blvd, Dmt 208 Clearwater Bcach, FL 33767 Scptember 17, 2004 Mr M]chael Reynolds City of Clearwater 100 S Myrtle Avenue POBox 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758~4748 SEP 2 0 2fJ04 Dear Mr Reynolds PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF CLE/\RWATER My name ]$ Anthony IIacqua and I bve with my wlfc at 855 Bayway Blvd, umt 208, on Clearwater Beach We wish to express our reservations and objectIOns to the proposed buIldmg proJect at 850 Bayway Blvd Our area IS not set up to have 'overmght accommodations" We are d reSidential area and thIS structure would not be benefiCIal to the reSIdents of Clearwater Pomt It would bnng more traffic and potential parking problems - espccIally during spnng break - to our locatIOn and over time thIS would ultimately effect the value of our property We also want to pomt out that there have been many condommlUms (valued at $750,000+) bUIlt along the water sIde of Bayway Blvd m the past scveral years and none have gone ovcr four stones Ho_w does thIS proJcct warrant two vanances? Why IS the uty allowmg tlns exception - espeually m such a reSIdential arca? If you allow this project to go through, you WIll be settIng a precedent, and not a good one, wInch would allow any buIlder to come In and do what they want m the Clearwater Pomt area It will alter the character of our neighborhood and forever change It Another matter IS the fact that there will be no pool m this development We have three pools and mamtam a Deach area These areas are [or the UbL. of Clt:drwateI POll1t residents We \vIll need more security for longer hours to mamtam our property Is thIS ':iomethmg we should have to worry about? NO!!! ThIS project will In no way enhance Clearwater Pomt, It will only take away from It We like thmgs the way they are A wise person once smd, "If It am't broke, don't fix It" That's how we feel about thIs pro) ect Cordl~ ~acqu~ .... '"" \ ~,.."....~.--r"~'i\ I"?Q) ~ ':c--' 1 - '\\ f 1 = I \,...." '=\'- - IJ \" . c.--., ~. ~t:;::::: ~ I,....-.-::J u""--- JA ' .t . "." de'lr '\ ~f J 1 rcJ IIi Cf ~gr' 2 0 lDa~ ~rJ'\ ~ 'Y "'\" ~ Il\:r:': ""'j,."\{1!1';';'\IlY tit L- .l..-.... .....~.... ......,.. L-", -::I V J.Y~;,JV"" ~l~'\:..~ 00llS 0 S 'Bi"-:t G: GU'-!\:rlit:o.11E~ t ~ .' rl~ 4(1( I -'.1_' , , , J i .. ~ I .. ::: _ Jj ~ ~f~c - ~ ML fuJ~~ .~ ~ C-t2-- __ '!) GJ )/LCr ( - /UJ--€- ~ ,~ OR\G\NAL '. F= C ~a:: w~ IlJUJ c:...~ -- dg: > c=t ~S 1:;:::1I ~ (fIX ""'= 0 W;}) l!B C\l bj.d (~ CL ~10 UJ .c:; !:.!,. IhJ:JJ fJ) ~O l~ C::'C=: ~~~ ,,-,0 12... 'l.,'nr~e _II~, i~ 9.... < r' '. t n \, , , ., ., &PrGf??€1l A; ,,:l DO Y -SEP 20 2004 0\': I I I J .'1') I Cl.l4~CL ~ ~ VrvDCO.$._ C-n Y or ~Uj,R/l- w ~ r6/L 1'00 S o "Ill 76:G- A lie: -- '60>;: 47~&' Q...L.~;qr{, vJAr'G"Lj TL. 337~J- - "'1't'J-- PLAN N I NG -&.- 0 E-V E LOPM E N1 SERVICES CITY-QF CLEAAWATEq o R 1-61-N-A-l- QrJ,1/1l S/L-' "" Y tV' IYfll e' -/ J:. TFJ l..,)t.n'V~ /J/t\l G:.c.,.;;).....y /VS ~- /7- -- 'X<!S.19_~ryT_ Qr f? S'I "b,qy uJ JfJ.'I_~(,,'(o_ ~/"\(.( T 8-0.9-' " / /~EJ ..I'd, ?_d. ~0~rc..,,!___~(2l!....) ~-Y) ,qD~ AW!L~C _ _Ttt117 mlz! r?~POSa,'D 7"UJSC,07 IJr &,s0 'J:/J'I'W~'I /-I;lJS 'A15Uc(Veo VA!i../4NUS/-/tOrfl---T"Hd OJ;L~~-;~6- CoOtE t- .nlt/ /1"18/ rWrj y ,/,fILe' '?;Gi"{NG. - -fiL,GOW00 r;:> 3,-, "-0 51 JI .radr ,fi-W""1 7Hd ?XJvlirt)-.:f~ WN6"rJ ---- -- -rJ.-J a C-o.o g-.S ~ if Qu I fLG: /-I, L. tf, n $ T /..5----' r a e77- /':Jt....S 0, -'JN~- c:Hljj;-rliv (.;, cODGf - 4L.COVIJ 3S' / /-f~("c, w T /.15 7i/.c:.__2 c~_7;Zcclr o",,-S rO'L__2UILD.HV. &.5 ~FVO_ .Yd_T 77-1,b veT..... t$ L uP6 L! H r 6' S1J ~ "I0A '/' qll.~ 6G'") AI 6 t-VL.W !.AI t;...:;) L/p-I--- - - u --- ':Z! ri fl} c; v 8 .f7/0 rV I nI C. rh w 'J H tt,J & 'ZJ€ v It L.oPl:!j I'z.,.j ,q1l.6' /J13t..-r.5 /v cHAI)/G~ COOB-S 7lY~T ;9/Lc t'.-y /!7rG~r-/ivo ?.lCvlU.:...sL'I 7V 0--Qrs,O -- u:rJOI)) -aLe. -,e''''r'rC 1L rV~W ov'-I' ~o nV-&..J.~ /t-y~r _ p::)/Le' __bO"nv G;. _ U'p ,tfYAvl;;. .BC61t1/ A..4o t-::J/u A & 0' AI (0 13 Y Tn i;Z (j k) S, TIN b C UO€s -- A (~ I " I @ l~) rYly l';U...f.f7~N.o /f/'l.Q nJYi{j,if ?6t: L-- TNIV7 T1Y~..ce' CIrIfl;;Ybt.s ~ vNf4'fl., _Arvo WILL- ~:t~u:- 7u'"""} 77v'&r CP/tclfU;jc..,'V(f;f'/" d 7/-16 rV~ Ic.h'13CXlLi 000. ""';I!' qfl-~ A (t'Q"; 6 50,1/\1 ~ u ~ #YA r V (j (/ '^ r!: c..,orv So (- 0 fb Ii ArI.D ?LAC-.ii 1t-1<i- INrrb/l<3~r ar """T1Y4 ?~.st06...-.1&.{ or Q...Lcf'j/I-uJli~ fM" ? ,:),nViT ~eJG 7#C vJA....r7~ ()~ rll~ J)fivt$Ci)I?e;z:- -l~ -Qug.rr1.7-v ------~ ___ ~UJl, ~r;!.{GH~~'Jt€Evj)PD J.SI__LCUS8N"'c..,yJ _A QU(6)- J< Bs'lOli<V'77nl- .:4IL&A vJ tT# A '6lb /~ z.vs.<( THfir W crHu ro i{2,GnJ;:}trV - A G4. S/ilA/&t1 4/lrtA. wa; 0 tJ Nor Wl~ (j)1l.. IV~ ?&~A(., U"'-'/TJ or /HIS rV/<!5" '34...< rI (j" :v 6 - Do W IV' 'Ti.4 - v.& Luc-" - oj:. - u Ut- r/l.ty? Jt,"1i Y' AND ~p;Jr/N~_JrlOrS(2...JT:.""'~ j-{aw __~NC) '-"JH-j/- -IHe-lb' V;;Jfl-c.alll/t.-eK t--l~vd. :agiO"" &ur17 aD /J~.qJ'LY oU/L ~clQ.:7"s/ -70 "?'..lV---/......- 77.rhr'-rHfi-Stt. -u-:::;7RCi;--:{ /-'-/rl.-IJ- /Ye-r /tt.-UJvJd';J ---r-v ~I{d 1?U!lC-G frJ/Y L) fltl97 wz-' ?~s.e;J'LVa -rt:ttJ. 'bdP/v7Y ~l'lIa S~,v/r':!l CJf' CJL.1"'L.- I1/WA- ___u_ ~lrJa~i-'f - --- - --- ~,() tJ U. ^"c;' ~ A C.& .o"'V4-l:".-- - &S J $:;/J-i vJfJL1 UNt-r &-O&-' C-(.(j JIJt'4.lATfEJt, ft \..b /ti DA 8"3 7 ~ / --ORIGrNAl ,-' ~r-"'"""'~r='r~f'~D 1-=:, _-I ,--: I ,;=\ I.] ~\.::=- '\::d; L= \j ,~ SEf' 2 0 2DD~ l"'J'[j ,,,,,,,If\'(';? ~~~I' r:"'~'T f1lCT\~"'IT" \ "'\J\.~'d\ '-~ l'; ;--:,'/L ,.~",t L'w'\:')'" U rF\Y 0[= (;1 0\~-ZiJ{[)JE~ .. JAVilaf~fo "- . ~- - -~ ~ - - d r .. t I MIchael Reynolds C/CIty of Cleanvater 100 S Myrtle Avenue Box 4748 Clearwater, F133758-4748 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENl SERVICES CITY OF CLEARWATER Mr Reynolds My name IS Kalhe 5Idens and T hve at 851 Bayway Blvd Apt 805 With my husband Arty We strongly obJect to the proposed project at 850 Bayway Blvd, as presented to your board Based on the plans It appears that thl:- wIll be a mixed used project of rental and hotel umts We believe your department IS not lookmg to protect the aesthetICS of Clearwater Pomt and the Beach commur11ty At present there arc no burldmgs on Bayway Blvd whIch front on the canal that are over four stones ThIS developer IS requestmg from your department a vanances that are not m the be')t mterest of Clearwater Pomt and Beach Commumty He IS requestmg a varIance to have hiS setback reqUIrements reduced by 9 feet to the pavement, and requestmg a varlance for a bUlldmg height mcrease by 14 feet plus appurtenances Tills Will set a precedence for future development that Will destroy the Integnty and beauty of the area The CIty, T belteve has set a reasonable standard and all developments should abIde to With no exceptIOns, otherwIse why set standards ~ Kalhe 51 ens 851 Bayway Blvd Apt 807 Clearwater Beach,' FI 33767 - rfA _' t j_ , )f ; , < . ,-' ~ t tj t ~ q I ~ , , r r'"/ r! I! r ,-' L -' , , \ I \i'tt: ~~ ti ~~lU) SEP 2 0 2004 rLA~J\~~\'S lDJER~~T~J1S~r r-TY OF ClEARW'~T[ER .I .. ~DS 0 S qj, , ~ -~ -- .J il~ ,.fi'..~ l(l_ ~ 1IL.t 1 1;.j-l -' ~ l li f ~.... .;I \. 't-, ..~ """--1 o [L~~~~~ 0- \\ SEP 2011I PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES erN OF CLEARWATER Michael Reynolds C/Clty of Clearwater Box 4748 100 S Myrtle Ave, Clearwater, F133758-4748 September 14,2004 ORIGINAL Mr Reynolds My name is Sam Meo and I live at 851 Bayway Blvd. Apt. 606. I strongly object to the proposed project at 850 Bayway Blvd., because tlus directly has a negative impact on the value of my property Based on the plans, It appears that these units will be rental units with people commg and going constantly Who IS going to buy my unit with the noise coming from across the street? ThIs happens now to a lesser extent With no one on the property for supervision. Place a larger structure on thiS piece of land and the problem becomes greater. There are no motels on this end ofBayway Blvd This is a reSIdential section and has been peaceful for many years This brings me to another point. I belIeve your department has not been looking out for the reSidents of Clearwater Pomt which has a large tax base and votmg block I feel your department has bent over backwards for the developer in approving TWO variances so the developer can build the buIlding he wants and not what is m the best interest of the residents of Clearwater Pornt and Clearwater Beach At present there are no bwldings on Bayway that are over four stories This developer got from your department a vanance to go fourteen feet plus over roof code. He also got a variance to have his property SIX feet from the pavement. There has been a lot of building going on III Clearwater Beach with condo units costing $750,000+. None of these bUildings are over four stories Why should the City allow this developer to be the exception? JQM ,,~ Sam Meo 851 Bayway Blvd Apt. 606 Clearwater Beach, F133767 , J! , "--- I ! ~ TII!;.MClO...:'):'O oS m1..:i,:AJQ ~"i.I:l~lffl!iJS ""TJ'l.'" i'..'j~ :jam:), .os~ _ u_ ,.j .....~..~-=;.~~ "---~- ..~.... -- J A t~ } tJ J ~i () - ..,. ~-"'~T . , , I , ' , , " , RECEijVED SEP 20 1004 PLA~NfJ\~3 D!EPA~l~~~E~rr r--r;y OF CllEARWATfER , " I .J \ l I I. ~~ J . I ~) , 1 G ~~~~~~ 8 ~l PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF ClEARWATEf::1 Michael Reynolds CICity of Clearwater 100 S. Myrtle Ave Box 4748 Clearwater, Fl337584748 -----..J September 14,2004 Mr. Reynolds ORIGINAL My name IS Jeanne Meo and I live at 855 Bayway Blvd. Apt. 601. I strongly object to the proposed project at 850 Bayway Blvd , because tlus duectly has a negative impact on the value of my property. Based on the plans, It appears that these units wIll be rental units with people coming and gomg constantly Who is gomg to buy my unit with the nOise comlDg from across the street? TIns happens now to a lesser extent with no one on the property for supervision Place a larger structure on this piece of land and the problem becomes greater. There are no motels on thiS end of Bayway Blvd This is a residential section and has been peaceful for many years. 11us brings me to another point. I believe your department has not been lookmg out for the residents of Clearwater Pomt which has a large tax base and votmg block. I feel your department has bent over backwards for the developer in approving TWO variances so the developer can build the bUIldmg he wants and not what IS in the best interest of the residents of Clearwater Pomt and Clearwater Beach. At present there are no buildings on Bayway that are over four stories This developer got from your department a vanance to go fourteen feet plus over roof code He also got a vanance to have hts property six feet from the pavement. There has been a lot ofbUIldmg gomg on in Clearwater Beach With condo units costing $750,000+, None of these buildmgs are over four stories Why should the city allow this developer to be the exceptIon? q~~ Jeanne Meo 855 Bayway Blvd Apt 601 Clearwater Beach, Fl 33767 '" .... ..., ~ ,....\; ~, - - : ~:: ~EtiE~VIED ~ I t'tIDS 0 S 4:la ~ SEP 2 0 2884 PP-.A~1\:"~nG !DErp,~RT:1fl~ff\jT C7Y OF CLIEA~WATfR J " 'II I r'\ i C: -, 'r\ i 1 I I~ ~ i ~,\ . ~ t~. !. I~. \i, ~ '" " .j' . I . , 1 , . 1 I . . " o [E0'~~w~ rD\',i SEP 2 0 2004 L:......./ PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF CLEARWATER Michael Reynolds C/City of Clearwater Box 4748 100 S Myrtle Ave. Clearwater, F133758-4748 September 14,2004 Mr. Reynolds ORIGINAL My name is Sam Meo Jr and I live at 855 Bayway Blvd, Apt. 601 I strongly object to the proposed project at 850 Bayway Blvd,. because this dIrectly has a negative impact on the value of my property. Based on the plans, It appears that these umts will be rental unIts With people commg and gomg constantly. Who is gOIng to buy my umt With the nOise coming from across the street? This happens now to a lesser extent with no one on the property for supervision Place a larger structure on this pIece of land and the problem becomes greater. There are no motels on this end ofBayway Blvd This is a residential section and has been peaceful for many years, This brings me to another point. I believe your department has not beel) looking out for the residents of Clearwater Point whIch has a large tax base and voting block I feel your department has bent over backwards for the developer in approving TWO variances so the developer can build the building he wants and not what is in the best interest of the resIdents of Clearwater Point and Clearwater Beach. At present there are no bUildings on Bayway that are over four stories This developer got from your department a vanance to go fourteen feet plus over roof code He also got a vanance to have hIs property six feet from the pavement. _ , There has been a lot of building going on in Clearwater Beach with condo units costing $750,000+. None of these buildings are over four stones. Why should the city allow this developer to be the exception? g 4 Jrr. Sam Meo Jr. 855 Bayway Blvd. Apt. 601 Cleanvater Beach, Fl33767 .} : ' t~~i1f.r-lt' ~ 1 f~ ~I ~ / ~ " " I 1 ~ t 1 , p - , J I 'I' , bl31.VM~\i13Jl:l.:JlO Al0 J.~3j[flU~~d3Q,e~~~~~d ! f. ~ ~ ~UUl 0 G d3S d3JA~3103J~ ." , l I - ", , I " , , , , , . ,~ffi1~ '0 S Q32 ~, _ ,,;>'Ilt, ..;41\:11 ~ J ,.J ! I~'U}. ~..... l...~ 'It ~~~ If' ," i.} I ~. , \ " I ,11 , , " ,'i ,', r-l , ~ I.. " , , ... ~ '. 'J l..,t I r ~~, .. I J~ ~ '... , , .' Michalek 6875 Anglebluff Circle Dallas, Texas 75248 SEP 2 0 2004 [} I I -, PLANNING & DEVELOPMENl' SERVICES CITY OF CLEARWATER September 14,2004 ORIGfNAL Mr. Michael Reynolds, Semor Planner City of Clearwater - P. 0 Box 4748 Clearwater, Florida 33758-4748 RE Almrnar Proposal Dear Mr Reynolds. As we are not able to attend the scheduled meeting of September 2151, 2004, concermng the Almrnar ( 850 Bayway Boulevard) and live on the Pornt at 855 Bayway Boulevard - Commodore 707, we are wntmg to vOice our concerns regardmg thiS submitted proposal. Histoncally, our CIty has had codes and regulatIons m place for proper commumty layout and environs protectmg the current resIdents, theIr children, and generatIons to come. With tlus legacy rn mmd, the CIty: · should not grant vanances or waivers to codes and regulatIons In place for special mterest mdivlduals, groups, or developers, · should preserve and mamtam estabhshed structureslbUlldmgs heights and setbacks as per code without exception; · should respect and foster the famIly and residential character of the neighborhood, I.e., a commumty Wltlun a commumty, and · should protect and enhance the value of existmg properties, e g, additional height, lessened setback from the street, blockage from the water, would result In a drop in value and economic hardship for current tax payers Mr. Reynolds, we trust that you will honor the uniqueness of the Pornt for years to come and not approve the Almmar Proposal rely, M~~'~ ( Rudy) and Chnstme ( Chns ) Michalek '.... Ml~ 0 S "Be ~, '~ ~a~"",~tf"'I... ~tEC[E~V[E[) SEP 2 0 2004 PLA~\%\1~~G lD[EPAR1M[E~T c~nr OF CUEARWATlER ... September 14,2004 o ~~~~W~ [N;! SEP 2 0 2004 ! L ,/ 1-/ PLANNING & DEVElOPMEN1 SERVICES CITY OF" ClEA9WA TER J Mr Michael Reynolds, Semor Planner City of Clearwater 100 S. Myrtle Ave. P O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 Re. "Alminar", Proposed Development at 850 Bayway ORIGINAL Dear Mr. Reynolds My name is Tony Manohas. My wife and I have a condommium, number 504, at 851 Bayway Blvd, m Clearwater Beach. The purpose of this cotnmUlllcatIon IS to mform you and other City Officials, that we strongly object to the subject development for the followmg reasons You are allOWing a variance to the height of the proposed bwldIng from 35 ft to 49 ft, and another variance to the front (south) setback from 15 ft to 6.03 ft. This will be the only waters edge building on Clearwater Pomt that does not follow the present zoning reqUIrements What is the basiS of your decision? Do you believe in conformity? You are allowmg rental uruts, and motel uruts, With people comIng and going constantly We already have problems, such as noise With the existing motel umts. I have personally called the absentee management, and the Police regarding tins The proposed development does not mclude a sWimming pool This will reqUire more security to patrol our three SWtmmmg pools Our property values Will declme, If the proposed development goes thru. In summary You ignore the mterests of the residents and voters of Clearwater Pomt . You do not seem to be concerned in maintaining the beauty, and character of Clearwater Point .You seem to have accommodated the wishes of the Developer. smcerel~~~ Tony and~~~~ 851 Bayway Blvd, Apt 504 Clearwater, Fl. 33767 , ' - \ ~- "'\ 'I --' r~1 t --r' , r.- J ' , ... t~~~ 0 S Q3Z "I , , d '1 ~ ,...., 1 (~ ,; , r' , , ~ , >J \ ( . '0' :J . )'~( .,f t1j It , - -' -'I, I 1 - ~ j 'l I -<: 851 Bayway Blvd #406 Clearwater, FL 33767 S[P 2 0 2004 .' Michael Reynolds City of Clearwater 100 S Myrtle Ave PO Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 PlANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF CLEARWATER Mr Reynolds OR1GlNAL It has recently come to my attentiOn that there IS a proposed project at 850 Bayway Blvd that IS requestmg significant vanatlOn to the buIlding code I lIve across the street from the proposed project and strenuously object to allowmg the suggested vanances for the followmg reasons . I belIeve that It will dimInish the property value of my neighborhood . Commercial property WIll be gammg a larger foothold m a pnmanly reSIdential neIghborhood · NOise whIch has always been a problem wIth that property will get worse . Street parkmg Will potentIally become more congested · There are no bUlldmgs on the water over 4 stones and Ifwe allow thIS vanance does It not open the door for more projects? · The setback vanance Will slgmficantly change the appearance of the neIghborhood - a Wide open fnendly neIghborhood WIll have a sore thumb shckmg out - practically mto the streett · The CIty appears to be helpmg a property manager to develop a property with reduced amemtIes which could result m theIr guests trespassmg on my aSSOCIatIOn's property to use our facIlItIes pools, hot tub, tennis courts, parkmg garage, etc If you do not hve m our neIghborhood, please consider walkmg through It at a lllce slow pace (on a weekend or after work) Pretend for a moment that you do bve here and ask yourself If you would want thIS project to go forward I vote no Please feel free to contact me at your convemence at 727-278-4421 If you have any questions Please leave a message (It IS my cell phone), I WIll return your call promptly 9((10(01.( ,. . !' J tr~3~IS t~~ ,==, n1: '..' , fl :1\ ... "-'\.I l . , ~-I {po 1-- tiff j ., bl311\1M~V31:) ~O AluJl J.N31rrul~'tId3/((] S~~~~VlId ~DDl 0 G d3S a3J^~3J~3J~ /" ~ PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF CLEARWATER MIchael Reynolds CIClty of Clearwater ,100 S Myrtle A venue Box 4748 Clearwater, FI 33758-4748 OR\G\NAL Mr Reynolds My name IS George Comnmel and I lIve at 851 Bayway Blvd Apt 807 wIth my WIfe MarIlyn We strongly object to the proposed project at 850 Bayway Blvd, as presented to your board Based on the plans It appears that thIs WIll be a mixed used project of rental and hotel umts We beheve your department IS not lookmg to protect the aesthettcs of Clearwater Pomt and the Beach commumty At present there are no bmldmgs on Bayway Blvd which front on the canal that are over four stoneS ThiS developer IS reque.')tmg from your department a vanances that are not III the best mterest of Clearwater Pomt and Beach Community He IS requestmg a vanance to have hIS setback re'qUlrements reduced by 9 feet to the pavement, and requestmg a variance for a bUlldmg height mcrease by 14 feet plus appurtenances This Will set a precedence for future development that Will destroy the mtegnty and beauty of the area The cay, I beheve has set a reasonable standard and all developments should abIde to wIth no exceptlOns, otherwIse why set standards In wntmg thiS letter I am contestmg thIS action ~e-.f George Commnel ' , , 1 851 Bayway Blvd Apt 807 Clearwater Beach; Fl' 33767 '- j l 11 , I I, I .< r !.. ~ t r I I I 1.J r , ) , ' f\j I ~ :2 ~ r C'l , t i I ~ ~ " ! It -.("C" ~ d " , " I, tl31'ifMOIV310 .:lO AluD ~ 0 S G3a J.N3~1~Vd30 eNiNNVlcl MOl 0 G d3S f, .. a3J^~3103J?dJ ~ ~ To Michael Reynolds C/CITY OF CLEARWATER 100 S Myrtle Ave Box 4748 Clearwater, FI 33758-4748 SEP20BM PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF CLEARWATER Mr Reynolds ORIGINAL Our names are Bradley and Nlza Shaw and we live at 855 Bayway Blvd, Umt #505 We are wntmg thiS letter under great depressed feelmgs We chose our property because It was NOT a rental buddmg It IS a residential bUlldmg We live here 12 months out of the year It IS qUiet and yet all convemences are aVailable Just a short distance away Dunng the hohdays Ie 411I of July, Labor Day, Memonal weekends, etc, our property Remains qUIet anc). not mvaded by rental people who come and go and really have no Interest m us or In our area of property We are very concerned WIth your positIOn m not protectmg our area "Why have you approved the reduction of the setback"? " Why have you approved a bUlldmg that will exceed 35' (35 to 49')? What about our pools? Are you provldmg and paymg for the addition secunty Which will be reqUired? I hope so at the CIty'S expense smce you approved It'''''''' We are very disappointed m your disconcert With the reSidences of Clearwater Pomt And Clearwater Beach and why are these developers be ALLOWED an exceptIOn To the RULE""'" I TRULY hope you Will reconSider your pOSition and stand behmd the WIshes of Clearwater Pomt reSidents Thank You Bradley & Nlza Shaw 855 Bayway Blvd, Umt 505 Clearwater Beach, Fl 33767 Sept 15, 2004 ~,A!v~_2 We.- "-'\L.- ~ er-- ~ ~ ~ '-l'~~~i J,rJ. /.}- /Je~ ~ dO.N~1 plMI J ~ -/p(.,.;f ~~ 7' ~/4,..t ~ .b 4~'r?2 ~~, 1~~fsJ~ -IT I J m;os ~ : " J I , '=-"""""" 1M ,.t:...C r ~~ :':<)tl.';l :'J h i;t~. .,:J <'0 VTI:.') .. \ .. RECEiVED SEP 20 2004 PLANNING DEPARTMENT cnv OF CLEARWATER OR1GtNAL flL Michael Reynolds , C/City of Clearwater 100 S. Myrtle Ave Box 4748 Clearwater. F133758-4748 " ' r ~ l : Mr. Reynolds \ I~\ I ~ ~' ,~t 1 'l l I I 1 /1\ \- PlANNrNG& OEVElOPMEkl9 ", J~ ~ ~,'i111~'1' h', SERVJCES "., , \"t;,~ ;, \\'-'1 III \1 --. ' ',' J J~'l' _I T OF CLEARWATEJl '1,~ 1\ '~~ \ My name is Pat Ruzzo and I live at 851 S. Bayway Blvd, Apt 604. I strongly object to the proposed project at 850 Bayway Blvd., because this dIrectly has a negative nnpact on the value of my property. Based on the plans it appears that these units will be rental units with people coming and going constantly, Who is going to buy my unit with the noise coming from across the street. This happens now to a lesser extent with no one on the property for supervISion. Place a larger structure on this piece ofland and the problem becomes greater There are no motels on this end of Bayway Blvd. This is a residential section and has been peaceful for many years. This brings me to another point. I believe your department has not been looking out for the residents of Clearwater Point which has a large tax base and voting block I feel your department has bent over backwards for the developer in approving TWO variances so the developer can build the building he wants and not what is m the best mterest of the residents of Clearwater Point and Clearwater Beach. At present there are no bUildings on Bayway that are over four stories. This developer got from your department a variance to go fourteen feet plus a roof over code. He also got a vanance to have his property SIX feet from the pavement There has been a lot of building going on in Clearwater Beach with condo umts costing $750,000+. None of these buildmgs are over four stories, Why should the city allow this developer to be the exception? JL4 851 S Bayway Blvd. Apt 604 Clearwater Beac~ FI. 33767 I t.l~ ,\,,, J ~ l \ , J . ,. .!../ 1\ ..~ \ t \ ~ """f... " h , ....~ ~ f i ;""1':1'/ /' vi'" ; j , ~ i.o{ ... ~., t 4 ___ .. , < . ~....,f'" /),.... ,. '_fJ, , ; , ' ,>) ~ ~'.... II ,\ . - '/ I I \J ill'1 ~ If l .1. , ~ (,.,l ~.. l" It' 1/ '.' ... itl 1'"'11 ( ;....t "',iJ 't{ i '1 I , I' :,1 .H r :~\ '..... ~ t 1,' I, ((, 'I' .. ~ J .; /(, , .' ~, .. t"f ....lJ , j ~ i ~ , i ... ~ , , t ~ J .JI r r '1;-- ~ T lofT "-1 r ~ i' l , ,I' (' j'.I',' 1 ~ 1~ ~ } ~r ~. I It!l It' , , , bl3l.VM~V3l1~ ~o AU:) J.N~~~~l(d3lq:gN~N~\t1cll " t ',~ )) t~ (~\ f.r ~i t ~DD~~!f~~[!d~ \ j~t ~J - ~ >ll'~_.~~lTi~- ,--- , . - '" - \ lV1::;~,nOJj'."'v, ~ -D~t\IMA..A t3:ll1M3a _ "~7^-,"I'ql..JjO ~o VfI:) L ~ ~:) (1 ,-.., ,,- l , . " -0 J '1 ,I. I nl , lJlH , 1"1 (~ 'I tl l ~ ~ I 1 ".d I , , ,,' t-) L.~ II.... ~(~1 or, , r' ..'" t I u '~...J' i ~ 'dj ~ i'~ I.. I ~l ~ :)',t 't' I 'Ii ~ d; ;, (J ~~' "1 :-l t 1 _ ~ t J (i {~{ j i 'lL I i ~i {,IIll (J"'llf \~ h IJ I L q~ p~l~ll"J.) ;1": l..~d r~, .M:, ~,.~ D~ :.'(~h~ I t ',..ir ) ... ~ ~ f 1 '*"., "'rt , l I ~ t~ , '. , , J jo; \~ r ~r ~ I l'l1 "1' ,0 1$~~1 jJJ./~l~" ;.c"j~" I J I pt ",)'.1 , . '. ~ ,J \j~'.I~l ~'n ,~JJ(l;! 'J... ~ , .' , .1 r : ~ ( td ~1 :' \..li J "r 1.)lj~~ ~i!l.'ti'n "U.I ;.. tt r l ~ ... 1~ l ~ ~ ~ ..., I lJ j ~ t) , ~ t t i ,,' .1 U .. ~ of J f j , ~ J f/""l K~... ~ I , 1 , , , \ '" It ~ ..,. ... I " ~ , , ....t.' f }iI.' ;"', ti j" ...-J ~ r " \. ~ ~ Hf \ '! , l~~ i " 11 .s...~ ift t.. (It !f! :,ll..- ~rl1 II I~ f)l\ f ~ ,J,;(~ .) '" \' "": ...t....;-L/ H j. '. J I"~ . , j,( 1.." i" I 1 ~ i~ " I , h~ J !~ j !j J..{f.J '... 'fJ f It .t~ ~ 1/,. F f t I.J ~J 'd" . III H J1 ~ I J ~ , I ~ J ~. .JI ....... 1.1 ~ ,." l- ~ J ~ 1 ~ .i r .of ~ 'n ,. 1.11 , .. ~{f 1(. ".! r.... :' ..... t t ~ J I ~ ; J I{l!/l ! .tJ.. !I~')t J' \1' ~:1J It ~~! 1.; ~f': ~: ~"r r!~ i"111,-Il~ t~ t' , {"j... (1 ' ~_l;. ) J ~,J ;lflll('(})tjpf, tl jl ~ 'I 1 ... 1 J <'ldJ r;t ~ " ~ J' rr.... Itj I ~I( J P II, l ;J" ~fi~jr"""".... f~ \ t ''''l ~ f of' . ' , l~ ,. rJ '/'J~ l~lf"r 'I!~ . ~~ 0' j J ~[ {~d jr f~~-c. rl~,jll '"" ~ l~ J :: if J~...~~~ 11 tt' .h~~j~~ ;\Jif./"'J"':j~F ,I [' ),:AI ,)l~ , , ~ ) d" i.~ f~d fHji""{\ ~n J' '.. )1 \ " , J '.' J 1 ( ," ,1' I ,'rI J: r,a- 11dJtJ "l ~ ........' . ! .; 1 ,,/. JC I~ t) ~ t' ~I ">4' ,I II" ... 0" Zr,.l"" t_r .t ( f ~ c , ~~" (" j.,r .../ " ~r~t~/~ 1..: lr ',If " ~ J..: ~ ,\ l' 5) "IJ"l , ,< i ~ f f'.~ t ~ ~~ll,,)}'" :fJt!;1 ~"-IP I rage I 01 1 Reynolds. Mike , ) From: T JBrady [tjbrady@totallnk net] Sent: Saturday, September 11,2004 1256 PM To: Reynolds, Mike Subject Chart House RECElllED SEP 1 3 2004 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY Of CLlARVVATIA Mr Reynolds, Please enter our objections Into the record regarding the conversIon of The Chart House to a condominium and hotel We object to exceeding the 35 foot rule thus openIng the door for future developers to do the same thing We are concerned that we WIll need to heighten our securrty at our pools @ Clearwater POint because of the fact that the renovations to 850 Bayway do not call for a pool We also object to the developers adding to the eXIsting height of the bwldlng, Sincerely Thomas J and Barbara J Brady 855 Bayway FIL~ ORIGINAL 9/13/2004 Page 1 of 1 Reynolds, Mike From ABC [abc@abc cal Sent. Tuesday, September 14, 20041013 AM To. Reynolds, Mike Ce' cpolnt7@knology net Subject. [BULK] Clearwater POint Importance: Low RECEIVED SEP 14 200, PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF ClEARWATER Dear Mr Reynolds, I purchased my unit at 855 Bayway #503, twenty-seven years ago I did so knowing what already eXisted on Clearwater POint and what had been approved All told I made my purchase based on the visual quality of the entire Pornt rncludlng Chart House Srnce then the various condominium aSSOCiations have done an excellent Job maintaining the very special Visual quality of Clearwater Pornt Because of this I take strong objection to the request by the developers of 850 Bayway to add to the eXisting height to make It the only waters edge bUilding on Clearwater POint which exceeds 35 feet I Similarly object to allowing the developer to reduce the reqUired setback The reality IS that once breached for this project, a precedent would be set which could (and likely would) be copied by any other developer To aVOId changing the Visual character of the neighborhood, no varratlOn to the code rn these matters should be permitted All the owners rn Clearwater POint bought With the expectation that there was and would contmue to be a certain fundamental quality I cannot believe that all these owners should be disadvantaged just because of the developer of one property This IS more than just a matter of loss of view, It has real economic Implications If this project IS granted the code vanatlons and others follow, It IS reasonable to assume that the resale value of all the Clearwater POint owners could be affected negatively The time to deal With this IS now - do not open the door even a crack The entire community of Clearwater Beach continues to have an enViable reputation because of the careful enforcement of codes This IS no time to open the dikes for variations that change our Visual character Respectfully submitted, OR\G\NAl Don Harper Arts Bureau for the Continents/Congress Travel & CrUises 350 Sparks Street - SUite 207 Ottawa, Ontano, Canada K1 R 7S8 Webslte www abc ca Tel 613-234-3360 Fax 613-236-2636 Toll-Free 1-800-267-8526 fiLE PLEASE NOTE We follow federal government regulatIOns which came rnto effect January 1, 2004, to protect personal mformatlon you prOVide to us We do not make our mailing lists and client addresses available to any outSide organization The only use we make of your information IS In relation to travel arrangements we offer to you and you request us to make We are permitted to Imply your consent to do thiS If It can be reasonably Inferred from your actions or Inaction, otherwise, you can proVide express consent orally, via mall, emall, or fax 9/14/2004 Page 1 of 1 Reynolds, Mike RECE.I~ED From: Nlmredy@aol com Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 4 29 PM To Reynolds, Mike Cc: cpolnt7@knology net Subject: 850Bayway Blvd/Chart House locatIOn SEP 1 a 2004 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Dear Mr Reynolds, My name IS Mrs Edith Imredy and my husband and I reside at 851 Bayway Blvd apt 701 We object strongly to the proposed project at 850 Bayway because It has a negative Impact on the value of our property Based on the plans It appears that these units Will be rental units, which Will bring constant changing In tenants There are no motels at thiS end of Bayway Blvd, and thiS IS a reSidential and very peaceful neighborhood for many many years We object to the request of the developer to add 14' the eXisting hlght up to 49' We are also objecting to allow the developer to reduce the 15' setback to 6 03 ' We feel that opening the door to sImilar variations from the basIc code, Will certainly detract from the fundamental character of the neighborhood As We understand the developer's project does not Include a pool which means our facilities Will be vulnerable and require more secunty with an Increased cost of our condominium residents I hope you Will take In conslderatlon of our request Sincerely Mr & Mrs Imredy 851 S Bayway Blvd Apt 701 Clearwater Beach FL 33767 OR\G\NAL FILE 9/13/2004 t'age 1 ot 1 Reynolds, Mike RECEl-V~ From Genl67@aol com Sent. Saturday, September 11,2004 1 17 PM To' Reynolds, Mike Cc: MAGBERNFLA@peoplepeeom Subject: 850 Bayway Blvd SEP 1 3 200~ PlANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER It seems allowances to height, dIstance of bUilding from street, ete were all determined without any notification to the neighbors It seems heights of bUildings IS an adJustlble Issue without regard to surrounding area What about parking for the proposed bUilding? What about the Issue of resIdents of the new building assuming that they are entitled to use the facilities of Clearwater POint I understand there IS no sWimming pool planned for the new bUilding Overall It seems that the planned bUilding Will Jam the property to the breaking pOint What IS the purpose of 6 motel rooms? More traffic? More transients In and out? It seems to me that our elected officials are not taking Into account the best Interests of the maJonty of residents of Clearwater POint Robert & Janet Gobeil GenI67@AOLCOM fiLE - ~ OR\G\NAl ~. I 9/13/2004 SEP 10 2004 11 40AM , LAGATTDEGRAZIA&MASON /' NO, 7148 p, 2 . .) " NICHOLAS J l...4.GA17UTA. JOEL J DEGRAZJA MAITHEW C MIlSON LAGATTUTA DEGRAZIA & MASON, P.C. Atromeys al Law SCHA.UUBURG CORPORATE CENTER 1515 WOODFIELD ROAD SurrE 880 SCH~UMJJURG, IL 60173 ~ fE C [E ~ V~ [D FIRM 8471240.5500 FAX. 8471240-5825 SEr 1 0 2004 September 10, 2004 lPLA~~ ~~ rG D\'!l?~~lM]g[Mlf enrv Of CllEARWAl[t~ Via Facsimile (727) 562-4865 and Regular Mail Mr Mike Reynolds Clearwater Community Development Board 100 South Myrtle Clearwater, Florida 99756 ~ Re: Public Board Hearing - September 21, 2004 850 Bayway Blvd Clearwater, Florida ORIGINAL Iv.lr Reynolds I an) writing with regard to the above-captioned matter I own a condominium at 851 Bayway Boulevard and my parents have owned one tn the same bmlding for tbe last twenty-five (25) years. This is directly across the street from the proposed new construction, Over the last five (5) years we have seeD Clearwater Beach become over- developed We are in favor of change and growth when it is good In tins case, it is not good- A couple of examples of the problems the over-building has caused have been magnified with the roundabout and the bridge 1eadmg onto Clearwater Beach Both of these disasters were directly caused from the congestion as a result of the new developments The <'Beach'" cannot handle any more people or congestton the new developments have created What used to take fifteen (15) minutes to get on and off the beach now takes up to ninety (90) minutes in a distance of less than five (5) nules There are so many cars now on the beach that it is no longer safe to drive I am sure the number of accidents on Clearwater Beach has gone up dramatically There is no more land on the beach to develop It seeItlS as though the city IS trying to turn Clearwater Beach mto the East Coast with all of its high-rises. ~ SEP 10 2004 11.4'IAM LAf,ATTDEGRAZIA&MASON NO 7948 P 3 .' Letter to Mr MIke Reynolds September 10.2004 Page Two ORIGINAL The SIgn at the pier says that Clearwater Beach is the number one beach in Flonda. I used to believe it until the over-development started The standards that made Clearwater Beach number one have been compromised The current condo and home- owners are suffermg while the developers are benefi:bng With regard to the proposed buildmg at 850 Bayway Boulevard, there is just not enough room to butld more condos The yacht club brings traffic from the Bayway side and Leverocks brings traffic from the gulf side The residents at Clearwater POIDt are surrounded With mounting congestion. Because of the cul-de-sac, there is no room for more congestiOQ, The additional traffic IS unsafe for semors and mmor clnldren alike Can the land avatlable at 850 Bayway sustain a buddtng as proposed by Decade Properties. Ine? I think not' With the traffic and safety issues the proposed buildmg will create, It would not be prudent to grant the permIt Please consider the residents at Clearwater Point and the overall negative effect the new building at 850 Bayway would have on the beach. Please deny the peront to build the forty-DIne (49) foot buildmg Thank you for your ronstderatton. Sincerely yours, )lJ.LJ ~ NICHOLAS J LAGATTUTA ~ILE ~ ..~,.-&j ~ SEP 10 i004 11 40AM ,. ! NO 7948 P 1 LA8^TTDEGRAZIA&MASON ./ . FIRM LAGATTUTA DEGRAZIA & MASON, P.C. Attorney.. at Law SCHAr,lMBUR(; CORPORATE CENIER lS1S WOODFIElD ROAD SUITE 880 SCHAUMBURG, IL 60173 NICHOLAS J l.wA1TVTIl JOEL J DEGRAZIA MA7THEW C, MilSON 847/240-5500 FAX 847/240-5825 DATE: ~O/C>Lf FAX COVER SHEET RE: PublIc" Boo.n:I Hean ~ SeptemYJe.r- ell I 8004 \ FROM: j\..{r tJ IdrlolCtS '1- Lo.fdo.Hu~ NO. OF PAGES: 3 UJ/(C)vex-- . TO: IU ('. t--..\ i \L€- ~e.~'f\CAd 'S FAX: rlCJ1) 5~-LjBtdS FAX: (847) 240-5825 URGENT: YES() NO() IF YOU HA VB ~ PROBLEMS wrrn THIS l'RANSMlSSION. PLEASE CONTACT (&47) 240-5500 III!llr~CWi'll/INUl]JI1fll.J F....:!WW" JaSllIIlll' 13..cm:lR/1/U ~..om~~"'umumrD ll.\ItTM I'fI!' v:!I OF11l1I 1NI!fflJ)lW.f<IMiW JolOl'l!' II l'BI .IWIlIlt QF ftttt ~ C! IIOT mlI' JNl11JiIlllf) J2tlJiNIr "" rBlI' OfIWfBZ aJ: _ ~ ro lIlWI'M 1r TO 11lB lIIJ'IDIZlSD JUCIIiIll/q, I'CU AIl8 mQr 1IOtJJ1ZJ) :rmr tJ/J' ~ JWr.IlIImQ'I' IlR twrrNJ (JJt JZ(J!I ~ IS STRIC11,f 1'1'.OHl1JlT1lD. 17 YOU 1<<I'.ll RHCl11JW Tl/l1 COM1o/lJNIDfrIO IN !WIOR, J>11I.d1lll IMUlJ)1A1lLt NCIT1FY us BY fELEl'RONE AND lIEZVRN mz 0RlG./U((.Mlill&lCl7l w usn TRB,.4BOl'E II!JD1lE$8 nt 71lEU3 POSTALsmwlCl. TlWlKraJ .. ~ -- f-- ~ ~ z -- UJ e u -- BUILDING AREA TABULATIONS 84" ~~ I f\ I ^ I . I \ (' U I I'" n L- 8FACes ENcLOSED SLOG T};FiRAcE TOlLER A~ (SF) GRoss AREA (SF) .. U) FAFO!I<JNG LEVEL 1 3.0 14,611 .0 LOADING ZONE I -<:{ TYPICAL LEVEL 2 "'.61" 3,311 ~ TYPICAL LEVEL 2 9..600 r3,3n TYPICAL LeVEL 3 11,210 2,21" FENTI-bJeE LEVEL 5 JI,2I.0 2..680 -<:{ UNITe RESIDENcee l-4OTEL TYPICAL. LEvEl 2 3 :1 TYPICAL. LEVEL 2 2 2 TYPICAL LEvEl 3 3 :1 FENTI-IOU5E LEvEl 5 5 " 13 It> TOTAL BUILDING l-4O'TEL SUITEe UNITe. Eo UNITe TOT At. BUILDING: REerOENTIAL UNITe . l3 UNIte tOtAL ENCLoeeo BUILOING AREA, 51.301 SF TOT AL tE~ BUILOfNG AREA, H,5B4 SF TotAL OCCupANt LOAD. l-4O'TEL F AFO!I<I~. It> 8FACEe (!NCLUDlNGr 1 He) CCNoo FAfl;!KrNG. 24 5F'AcE& (INCLUDING I GUESt) ./ ALMINAR RESIDENCES .. SU/TEe FLORIDA BUILDI1>G CODe, 2/Zl01 EDITrON INCLUDING t/./E FLoRIDA Acce&eIBILrry CODe _A "". lIFE ~ COOE;. - EDITION ~ ~ "" NEw APT BlDGe OCCupANCy CLAe8/FICAtION ENClOSED BUILDING AREA lCF<'RAcE AREA tOtAL. SUILDIN::i ~A RESrCENtlAt ~1Gf.lRlSE 51.301 eF. 11.5&4 SF 6&,891 5F. ClCCUpANT lOAD, APT FORT""", _ 2e0 "" FER FEIOSON """"" ELEvAtION 1St FLOOFt, ELEv. 1.0' NGvo FLOOD ZONE. , ,I (AE) ELEv. feJ.0' aJlLOfNG HEIGW ,-45'-0....... ABovE BA8E: R-ooD ELEv. FLue 16'."" 0VCJ;e Piil.N ~ ELEvATORtNeQ.l Wlm TURlT LOOI( 50 StORIES FLUS Roat= AND ELEVAtOR I'1EC/-jANIC4l LEVEL MAX. BUILDING 1-/1' BY COOe. le0' ABove BA8E FlOoD ELEv. 'TYPe CiF CONeTRUctION, 1YFE II AlL<lIIl<eLE flOOR lOAD, /lEE S~ f'lANe BY OJ;: OLseN . ASeoc. DCSIGN "'"'" lOAo&- ~ BY TOE _""'" C/' AScE , (IbUt U J:ec) FULL,( FIRE 8FRrt.B<LEFiiSO BLOG. F'EFt 5cciNFFA"', (30-3.5) FUlL '( FIRE AlAFiN F'RorEcreD BlCG. FER ~AI.0r (30-3.4) UNIT ""'T AccEss, l1Ib I<E1"fon!: El<IT STAIR Touaoe ARE flMoI<e","""" Touaoe OFF A I ~Ft FIf"iE RAlEO CGREea CORRlDOFt FER FBc 10e5.s IE :1 ~ .! ~ :1 ~ li! l).. -f 2 IEJ I )B )B [JJ[) [JJ[) [JJ[) I I NIl" , it 't 3111:1 lV'NI81(Jfl I I I I } . :1 ~ lIJ -t oei I!! . ~ It -t 2 C l; s: f t ;tt t t '~ ~ I II i~ _ !~ __ !~ _ !. _ ' _ " 'I i j i I I , , , I 'I i i I I I ~kMM~ l\jN18/~O ,- J , 'I Z :1 ~ :1 ~ It ):>. -f 2 ~ II - , I I I I I I !I II i! i! i~ i! il + ~ + ~ + t ~ ... to I; ~ 2: :111:1 l\fNI8Itj~ 'I III 'I ~ '. Of I pI m " ~ " ~ 2 ! I ! I I , , I I , I I i, il i! i~ ~ i. .tt t t t t , c -c;; s: 1 i ~~ ~l VN \9 \ Cl n I I I I ......................... t.) c-- -s ~ ~ to . ~ ..! J; ~If t- , r- ------- .' " , ": "- '- I-;) <: .............. Ole -- .....-- N (;;> il .1 oX \..It ~~ m"" ~ ,.to_ .".-< ... j f . ! \I I :~ {jl c :4 l1t ~'~~~ l"' r 1 1 ,...-. t '_'_ o l'JN om ",>- 1-' .., \-11\\ I C\ \ >-\ n , (J ~ ,.. ..-" 1<""",\ 11\ , ^ I ORIGINAL Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. CIvil Englneenng, Landscape Architecture, Planning 701 S Enterpnse Road E , Ste 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 (727) 793-9888 Phone (727) 793-9855 Fax r'''' P"- kelth@kelthzavac com August 25, 2004 glr~~~~~~,rnJ 1F~11; 11 ! ~ " ~ " I -J) ~ U I I ' -=="'" L....- _ _ I Plf,' LOPMENT , \I ,-,ES C ,\ u, CLEARWATER Enclosed please find fifteen reVised sets of plans and exhibits addressing DRC comments Including the following Mr Michael Reynolds City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S Myrtle Ave Clearwater, FL 33758 RE FLD2004-04026 - 850 BAYWAY BLVD Dear Mr Reynolds GENERAL ENGINEERING 1 A staging area has been added to the Side of the loading space for temporary placement for trash pickup 2 It IS our understanding that the gate IS a roll up that Will not take up Sideways or front space 3 The sanitary service IS shown to be core drilled Into the eXisting manhole 4 The 5" size obtained from the City utility atlas has been revised to 6" In size 5 The tap connection has been revised from utilization of the eXisting tap, to an open cut and connection to the 6" main 6 Tapping sleeve and valves have been added to the potable and fire connections FIRE 1 Fire department comments 1-6 are acknowledged as requested and Will be prOVided pnor to bUilding permit 7 The standpipe water supply has been extended to the second dock and Will provide service within 100 feet of pier connection 8 All revIsions have been clouded per request LAND RESOURCES 1 The retention ponds have been revised as requested to save the eXIsting pine trees along the west property lIne , \ LANDSCAPING ORIGINAL F~LE - ----- 1 Based on the enclosed reVISions, an Irrigation plan IS being preparea-aAG-wl.lI be fOlWarded upon completion PARKS AND RECREA liON 1 It IS acknowledged that an open space and recreation Impact fee IS due pnqr to bUilding permit SlORMWAlER 1 Enclosed IS a copy of the SWFWMD "No Permit RequIred" approval TRAFFIC ENGINEERING 2 The City handicapped detail has been added to the plans Please see the attached response letter from Gillette ASSOCiates for traffic englneenng and 1 planning comments relating to the bUilding and parking garage 11ft - ... 1ft } ~t~ ..i~ ~j .~~.~ C) ::::0 GJ Z ):> r- 1 tl ~118 I 0-~ G-J~J \_~ 5 -- I':=::J 0... 10 l -j L - l- e u ~ q '" ~ ~ 'I ~ ~ , \l\ ~ ~ ~ 57~+" ". ., ". .' Community Response Team Planning Oept. Cases - ORC Case No.rLO.::? OOL/ - r:>'-/o;;;(_ Meeting Date. cr-- /.;? -dOG s/ Location: ff'.s-o ~ :,;/( 4/0 '// ;;;:;[/{./.--/(~ (~~ff /2%/ -S;;/cS Q Current Use: Q Active Code Enforcement Case @y.es Q Address number ~no) (vacant land) Q Landscaping ~no) Q Overgrown (yes) @ o Debris (yes) ~ o Inoperative vehlcle(s) (yes~ o Building(s) ~(falr) (poor) (vacant land) o Fencing (none)e;> (dilapidated) (broken and/or missing pieces) o paint~(falr) (poor) (gansh) o Grass Parking (yes)~ o Residential Parking Violations (yes) ~ o Slgnage (none) <@Q(not ok) (billboard) o Parking (n/a) ~I~~ (handicapped) (needs repaving) o Dumpster ~os~not enclosed) o Outdoor storage (yes) ~ Comments/Status Report (attach any pertinent documents) Date 7!27/4 Reviewed Qy' l" <: ~'L( V~ Telephone CG-d ~ 'I?c -<;(1 Revised 3-29-01, 02-04-03 ~ AA Equ,l OppoctuMr Em.,loye- Watson L Haynes II Chair Plnellas Held! B McCree Vice Chan Hlllsborough JudIth C WhItehead Secretory Hernando Talmadge G "Jerry" RIce Treasurer Pasco Edward W Chance Manatee Thomas G Dabney Sarasota Maggre N Donunguez HlllsbOfQUgh Ronnie E Duncan Plnellas Ronald C Johnson POlk Janet D Kovach Hlllsborough Patsy C Symons DeSoto D~Ylri L Moore ExecutIve D,rec,of Gene A Heath Ass,s,an\ Executive Director WLlllam S Blienl.y General Counsel South\!~lest Florid~a jffater Manag en1,ent Dl,strzct _"Pf'f.'"F~v:;ij""J.5;iJ:o-.~ - .... .... ~"",4"'Y":---J-'-;'.......:.- ~~;;::~J:~~ ..,,' ~f-::; -....,~~#....dl'l.. __l'" ..... t: t- .... .....t;;1.;::r,;I~.,..... ~ "'"".....L j 1-;:;../ '.-.... .,......~ I -:;/9 -15 02- -7 fellfYll L;;- 2379 Broad ",reet, Brooksvlllc, Flonda 34604.6899 (352) 796-7211 or 18004231476 (FL only) SUNCOM 6284150 TDD only 1-800231-6103 (FL only) On the Internet at WaterMatters org ~ Bartow ServIce Office 170 Century Boulevard Bartow r10flda 338307700 (863) 534144801 1-800492 7862 (FL only) SUNCOM 5726200 Lccanto Service Office 3600 West SovereIgn Path SUlte 226 Lecanto Flonda 34461-8070 (352) 527 -8l31 SUNCOM 667 3271 Samsota Service Office 6750 FfU ItVI lie Road Sarasota Ronda 342409711 (941) 377 3722 or 1800-320-3503 (FL only) SUNCOM 531 6900 Tampa Se,vlce Otl,ce 7601/HIghway 301 Nonh rampa Florida 33637 6759 (813) 985748101 1 800 8360197 (FL only) SUNCOM 578 2070 August5,2004 (0:'\ ~Ir rc W:\!,I ~ ~ JL-,l Ir--' ,J ..... '(!"' J I_~__ ('"-'-- Rick Gillett Decade Gulfcoast Hotel Pamers, LP N19W 24130 RlverwQod Drive, SUite 100 Waukesha, WI 53188 J Subject Project Evaluation - PermIt Not ~eqUlred_ '"' 'l ') J,--2 ~ .:. ~ -VELOPM[NT S t: flVIc'ES .JL ":~-E-"qWATER PrOject Name Inquiry Number County SecfTwp/Rge La II t ud e/Longltud e Almlnar EX 994 Plnellas 17/Z9S/15E 2r58'02 60"/82049'12 88" Reference Rule 400-4041, Florida Administrative Code (F A C) Subsection 373 406{6), Florida Statutes (F S) Dear Mr Gillett The Dlstnct has reviewed the information you submitted on July 12,2004 for the prolect referenced above and has determined that an Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) WII! not be reqUired lor the proposed demolition of the eXisting site and the construction of ttle proposed bUilding with covered parking, which Will result In the decrease of vehicular use area and a 5,311 square foot total reduction In ImpervIous area The Information received by the District will be kept In the Tampa Service Office to SUPDOrt the District's determination regarding your project The Dlstnct's determmatlon that your project does not require an ERP IS only applicable pursuant to lhe statutes and rules In etfect at lne tllne the information was submllled and may nol be valid In the event subseoueni changes OCCUI In the applicable rules and statutes Additionally this notification does not mean that the District has determined lhat your proJect IS permanently exempt Irom permllllng requlremenlS Any subsequent change you make In the proJect's operation may necessitate further evaluation or permitting l:Jy the Dlstnct Therefore, you are advised to contact the Dlslrlct belole beginning the prOject and belore beginning any activity which IS not speCifically oescnlJed In youl submittal Your timely pursuit of tnlS aCllvfty IS encouraged to avoid any potential rule C'hanges that could allect your request This leller constitutes notice of FlI1al Agency Action of the prOject llsled above A requesl for hearmg must (1) explam how the subslantla! mleresls of each pel son / equesllng the heanng ">'111 be affecled by the O/stncl's action, or proposed actIOn, (2) sl91e all malenal facts dlsputea by (he person requestlllg the heanng or Slale Ihal there are no dIsputed facts, and (3) olheM/s8 comply with Chapler 28-106, FA C Copies of Sections 28" 106 201 and 28-106 301, F A C are enclosed 101 your reference A request for hearing must be Iiled With (received by) the Agency Clerk of the Dlstnct at the DistriCt's 6rooksvllle address Within 21 days ollec81pl 01 thiS notice T 1 r I r" n~ \ - /' Permit No EX 994 · August 5, 2004 Page 2 ., Receipt IS deemed to be Hie filth day after the date on which this notice IS deposited In the United Slates mall Failure to file a request for heanng within this time period shall constitute a waiver of any right you or such person may have to request a hearmg under Sections 120569 and 12057, F S Mediation pursuant to Sedan 120573, F S , to settle an administrative dispute regarding the DistriCt's action In this mailer IS not available Enclosed IS a "Noticing Packet" that provides Information regarding the District Rule 400-1 1010, FA C, which addresses the notification of persons wnose substantial Interests may be affected by the District's action In this matter The packet contains gUidelines on how to provide notice of the District's action, and a notice that you may use If you have questions regarding this maller, please contact Richard MAlt, P E, at the Tampa Service Office, extension 2045 Please reference the Project Name and InqUiry Number In future communIcations concerning this project rQ)[E~lE~~~ fR I U/I I ) I 5 I J I 0') (:J , ~ Alba E Mas, P E, Director Tampa Regulation Department AEM RMA elb Enclosures NotiCing Packet (42 00-047) Section 28-106 201 and 28-106 301, F A C InqUiry No EX 994 Frank R RaCine, K8Ith Zayac & ASSOCiates, Inc " ,,-' ,'i r ~\ ELOPMEN1 SFHVICES C '\ Of- C~E"RW^TER cc 01: , " ) f\ l.- Sarasota Miami New York 1543 Second Street Sarasota Florida 34236 941 9574477 fax 941 9574151 glllettardt com AA0002317 AROO07496 rni Gillett Associates AROT GROUP IrL~~,fC-:--~ , I ~.,/ - Ilr,' .' 1..,' L.. PUtt \ INCORPQA."TEO 8/25/04 To CIty of Clearwater Planmng Dept Re Almmar Case # fld2004-04026-850 bayway blvd , ell', ' -------~--~ -~ ThiS letter IS 10 response to Plann10g Dept comments dated 8/11/04 Traffic Engmeenng 1 Please find enclosed revIsed parkmg plan that Illustrates parkmg space dImensIOns 3 Please find enclosed revIsed parkmg plan that Illustrates turnmg radIUs 4 Please find enclosed revIsed parkmg plan that 1llustrates column locatIOns 5 Please find enclosed revised parkmg plan that Illustrates clear ceIling heIght of 8' -2" Planmng 1 Please find enclosed revised color elevatIOn that Illustrates dimenSIOns 2 Please find enclosed reVIsed sIte plan that Illustrates we have ehmmated the plaza on the front entry, no front setback reductIOn IS reqUIred 3 Please find enclosed reVised elevations that Illustrate the bwldmg height IS 49' 4 Please find enclosed reVised site plan that Illustrates the hotel parkmg IS 7 spaces 5 The DRC agreed that only one color "front" elevation IS requIred 6 The first seven spaces III the garage are for the hotel functIOn The entry gate has a phone for approved access Issued WIth registratIon 7 Same access for both uses Parkmg garage IS secure completely so gate access IS on approved key card or phone approved basIs. of course, It can have EMSlFlre overnde Smcerely, Richard C GIllett PreSident n'" "f\'lL t )\I~r\ Architecture Urbanism De_swn .., J 1 ')/ 'II , /:' \ \ J I I " [I Ii 'I I! 'I ~l il Ii , I I \t I' I I I I , [. I' , !~ r " ~ ;~ ~ II' " 6 '< !) " 3 :r ,.. -'I r :1 r , ,'I \ I,. J , .~ ,I / :: I i Ii ............... II ! ' ~ /, ,: 11 J I , , I 1 r I , , , I I :1 .1 t lP d II ~h @ ~ ~ .:( ;; -"60' b '~.~~g' ;; 0;; ~~ J!?!t "i%: :t~ ! ~ ;;. 1lI ~ p .... c:- ~ ~!: 1 ' " I ~: I -.... i II I Ii I i I i 3J 11:1 lVNI9-+ --- .......-~--. Iii Ii AI i j iO....r> nj;l;l;Jo;!l;;-- -~- in 2"2~~;;i!;~;: ~t~ ~~~ Q;li li@2~ ~ n ~ ~; ~ ~ ~ :~ ~n > ~. ~fi~!~a'~ e~ ~~~~'j<6~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "~~ J I' ~.~)~~ i ~~i :H~~P ~ ~~ ~ ~~!~@~s~~q j coi;;;;~2~8~ :~ !5E ~i~ ~ e~ ~ ~;iiiIC~Ui~! ~ i; ~i""~ ~8~~C~ ~ ~~ \:t ! ~~ B ~ ~ ~ g ~ z ~ I~~~~~a ~ ~ d V~!!l H ~ ~ , Iii r :' i~ ~ !~ij' ;! ~~ Iii i i:: [;0..... ~ ;;.. 9' ~ ~H n~ ~~~~~~! Ei~~~~~ :z .!: ~ !? ~ t-: i ~n U ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~p :;0 ~ ~ ~~ Ii ~~ ~ ~n;~ <il~ " ; ~ ~ ~~ ~ i ~ Ii g ~ ! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~a i i ~ ! ~ S ..... (1\ I"" ... I-" ~~a~I~' gi~~~U~ ~~~~i "I ~ ~ ~ ! i e ~ I ~~ : I ... ;'c- '" ~ ~ ~~ i ~ QQ Q ~ ~~ ~ . ,,~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ 2 a~ ~ ~~ ~ il~ " ~~ iI ~. 1 ~" ~ ~~ ~ ~ij ; oll'I!li !. ;! ~ ~ ~ ~ ! ~I ~ ~ q i~~~H1i~~~~ 8 ~ "'~~ ~~~~~ i!. l;~ !!~j ~ ~ ~ i >~ ~~:s: I 8 ~ ;;,r"-:IE ~ o ~ ~ '&~B ~ ~ ;~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~u~~1 m~~~ - i g i ., ~ .. ~ ~ [j x i I ... ~ I' ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ I. J ~ ~ :! z.~ ~~~~ '" ~ . ~ I a ~ ALMINAR DJX.W =1SI1Ilml. PJJlIl,lI5, ~P KE./TH ZAYAC" ASSCX:lA TLS INC- NIt} I 2~lIl RM.TOOD DM gJJ'I'IllX1 ~=:t~tI+~.oIJ"L~r-mQUlJ' ~ 1AtrmiEU. flIn!raN ~S':I =~IIi:IlrR~ fIlA. m'~ ....~~ ..jl..e ! ~ ~ i c; ~~~:..::- CITY 01 CLEARWATER SITE PUN 'l)a,lE~I,," .. ~_~""'"~ .,..,fIIo..Ifd'ott_ I '" ~~~~~~~~~~~ijq~~~~~~~ij~ ~{i~~i~{~~{ii~i~~{iii~ ~ :i}" I fi iHmJ!i II g W!9r::-j'U-< ~. f ~i~.U :~ ~ih l' ."-- :r'l. d ; ~ """" r:i"I.;: if "" ~~~! ! '! 11 I", l~. ~ II IIU ~ii ,1! .,,~ I S If I" . II · . . J mijij~ ;HU'; -< fWd! iii!lf~ o j 't~ ~- ~ ~J =~ ~ -, ~ !O:!i p~ ~ f'~ ; l' g . ~ ~ . i I! ~H!tifi ifpil!H!i~ .:ri Iii JPih. ~i 'f n II I ~ ! i I I' i - J (! t I ~f. 1 H f ,J .!{ I'l I j -< r.~i' j fl di Iii ; fl II 'I~ !. 1l.J: t j II ; ~ ff L i:i :: t ~I I. I' i ~ "_h",lll jnS It i q f!t:G h. Ii } l 1,- J 11 { ~!1 i 1: ! hI, t d' . l i I It tf } ,a i' i " I ~ . Ii l , ~ f;t:=:~D;;jj:;jiii.j;O.:;;:i=;;J:= ;;-"'....~ li"~t" 1"'- , I i I' 0 , , '<" 11 f " -! ! 1 l':'}' If ~1 < ~li.' !' · fl' F i r I a ~ II n U 11 i ~J il ~f 1!:1 ji F ~~ f i.a :! ! !!I if I . n II j; f I ;! r; ~ :;i;l;~ :!i l~ ,1 n . "Ill ;;!( i , :il I' i' y'!~ ,l( !( " " .l'( I l'; "I i hIl ~! ,'tl ~ 'j H . i ,I . ~l II! Ilf I; . '" Y I.' I II'. I ! I: i: t i : It It I Ii.' II ;}Il ' .t I; ~ 'J i ; I" jl! I i il Ii n !ll; !: nHiiFi ! ii H ! ~!~ n !!t J · i. J' ~ i ,I i " it' I' . :. 1 II' { 'h 1 I 'l~ I I i f I : j r: ~ ; ill j Hil : t 11 i ii, I; r: i I ! i ~ I !! ; H ! ! i H:; ; i i i !i: i! H i I. .!.( f . i : ' I 'fl'i fit I III ,f t~ I ! i I ~ '. !.! I' HI ! I I; ~.; I ~ ,; ~ tit t I, I - i' i ti'i I l " J1 t I II i .' I J (! Ii! i I I Ai I, .. i ;! ::i I f j: I : I,tll I!. 'l;d'I.lj · i ; it r j i i f i !: i HI f 1 j; ~ ! I (,- Ii! · t Iff J.. · ~I I .~ I ! I I J " !!II ! ':ze. E.fQl:JT'I'CW'"t;\W"IR "_F'!IDofi"l_ - co ~ f v 0 ~ " . ~ ~ <0 . -~~_.- ...Il-=aoll[... [Ill _ '0 I. ~~ .~ ~ i" Ie ~ ALMINAR DlI'.AlIlI Gll\i1ll!SI Ha!lJ.PtRlll!JlS.1J> ~~i-\~~~I,,~'~ !fI!! I 24.1:11 RlYDOOD IlRFi1. sum; lOO a.LitII..uIft l"IN.'IU,[dI1.~ ""w:J'SIU.. ra1IlGN ~8B ~~~ CLKA.RWAThR I UJR1DA UNDSCAP E PUN --~... i i i i ~ i;~ ~ ; i ~ ~ ~ i: H l~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~:i if U : ~ ~ l~ ~~ ~ ~p f~' ~~" ~;.I'i ~~~~~~H t< ;< ~ ,l(". ~ ~ . ~ B ~Ii 1!~ I ~~. ~ ~ ,,~ i' > _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~"j Ii II .. ":: II a , ~~ r;l( J.' ~ I" Q ~ ~ ~ -<~! i i1 ..,,; ~~i'i~h ~ n @~;g ~ ~il 2~~ ;:!~~. II'" ~~!!.~ ; ~"' !S8 cil~ ~ ~~ ~Slll- IIlo 1;i'\ll._I!Ilr"i:l~....i'o!o:--~ f! J!" ~~ S"" ~ ~ ~ ~ 'l" ..~~ ..~ J pij: ~ 10;. g: ;a 1Il.: q ::::J:: ~ till ':f 3: .H 15.5 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ g" ~ ~iiai~BU~~~~;; ~;~ 8 iluh~a~~;;~ ~ ~Il ~~!' ~ ~ ~ a'::" : := ~ ; II ~ ~; _$ h~~~~l<ft" ,;! ",- ;~Bi.5.5 ~~ - , I ~ H ~;~ ~ ~ ~ ~iP ~ ~~ i J ! ti ~" . ~ ~ ~ 0 . ~~~-=- ~ ~I't ~1Ot .' ~ 1 t ~ ~ i ~n n ~ ~~~ ~ ~ " Jie~ ~ m ~ .: i 8 1 :ij ~ ~ . r~. ~ ~i; ':~ ~ ""~ ~., y ~ s! a ~ ii tt" ,,~ ~~ l::~ p ~m ~ ""i~ . ~~ ~ ! ~r$: ~.1 ~'::~!'Ip.m n ~ Ii. ti ll.ll.ll.!'."D ~ ;~~~~ q ,,~ f , ~ ~ ~ ! ii ~ i > ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I . ,.. PliP ~ i ~~~ i ~ 1.l ;; ~ H I ~"~::!~ ::Eg~\i: II I: r ~ l~ =~r 'iIJ~ ~"i~~~1i~ ~. <'to;;. nb~ 11: ~ ~ "'~ ~f~.;; J; ~ ~ ~ ....~i; 8 'i! 5 . ~~ 1'1 ; t ~e;; ~ ~.. 8~ I; ! x ! i - ! I I ~ ~ ~ ~ : ~ g ~ i ! ~ $ ~ . 1. p j :::; . ., l'1 . '" ! 0 t; 'i ;~ ~~ 'C ~ Al.MlI<AR EWDt: &W1:'ll.l3T lIlII'1 P!RIliKllil.lJ' KEITt'ZAYAC..A55OCIATES.ING illS , OO:Jl1lM.1OOll1lilll !WI! un 0.<-0o.ulU""" """'""""""""'''''"''' I'L-.o 'lWimA. ~ ~tiS ~ -- ~mfU'lilll. CITY OF ClEARWATER SlIT PIAN , d ~l.t ,.t , ~ iiilW i i if I ill t j lfii ~ ~ ~ m!ili' !fj~;.i I , .~.. f '. )1>" j ,- "," ,~ .~iH "" ~ ~ ... "".:: ,. .... ~ ~ ~ Ii ~ ,J . . J ~~^\ ~o . ~ ~;Ili I it ' J ~ ~ i ! I f 10 '11 n j ~ ! 11 :j ; ~; . j : l! ! . ii f ~ u [U'J!II!:llIJ'C9.m ~ IIl9' 1!lI3l ~ Pll!llIIR!l,!.p KUTH ZAY ,.- _ llilll SlllI'Il <M-' ""-.... ~ ",..~,~ nulJS1I.~~ 100 -::"f_ ~TL5.1NC. ~5! --= NUt1't~ - ........... ._~ --=- ~u;o_ AW1NAR CLEARWATER f'lJ)RlOA lANDSCAPE !'L.\N ... I' , ~ c > . ALMINAR ESTATE VILLAS & SUITES MARINA CLEARWATER BEACH o Resort enclave with two and three directional views, intriguing loggia pool with views to North and South Intercoastal. o Club, concierge, sun terrace, loggia, roof terrace and marina features. o Dramatic floating penthouse with complete open VIews. o Estate landscaping and shoreline walk. o RIG l :'\~ A L FILE , An Equ.1 Opportvruly Em~r Watson l Haynes II Chair PlOellas Held, B McCree V,ce Chalf Hlllsborough Judith C Whitehead Secretary, Hernando Tal madge G "Jerry" Rice Treasurer Pasco Edward W Chance Manatee Thomas G Pabney Sarasota Maggie N Domlllgue:z: Hlllslmrough Ronnie E Dunc," Plnellas Ronald C JDhnson Polk J3net 0 Kovach H 1[1 s borough Patsy C Symons DeSoto David l MOQre Execu"ve Director Gene A He~th Asslscant [xecu(lve Drrector WIIII~m S BII"'n~y General Counsel SOlltnvvest Floricla IX/ater Mq,~nage1nen}_ 9istrzct --~.t"i0_ d::r.-J-~vJJ.i:~~~~ :~ - ~~rz..;z-~TSiS0<>~"->:.f - ~-'~ ......:.: .' ~ '-'"'::" .. - ~~..... -r,.t ......<' r ~-F ;=;~(~ ~" ...... .z......:..lp~.....II.... , -71:; h /J- 1> -1../ -.!.. ~7 Q !;d J r- J A. L reV-v11 L~-?' 31\ 'rt;! t'I~\It'F\otsvllle, Florida 346046899 352) 796-7211 or 1800 423-j 476 (FL only) SUNCOM 628-4150 TOO only 1 800-231-6103 (FL only) On the Internet at WaterMatters org Baltow Se'Vlce Office 170 Century 80ulevard 8altow ,Iondil 3383G-7700 (863) 534 1448 or 1-8004977862 (Ft only) SUNCOM 572 6200 Lccanto SerVice Office 3600 West Sovere,gn Path SUite 226 Lecanlo Flondil 34461 8070 (352) 5/7-8131 SUNCOM 6673271 Sarasota Service OUlce Tampa Service Of~'ce 67 SO FIUllv,fle Road 7601 Highway 301 North Sarasota, Flonda 34240 g 711 Tamoa Ronda 33637 6759 (941) 377 3722 or (813) 9857481 or 180G-320 3503 (FL only) 1800836 0797 {fl only) SUNCO 00 r r~rr~ 5i7a~_-70r-, 1 Ore ( - 1;-- I \ \ {I I._~ -- . l!;\siG1 ,~, ' '11 _ 0-;--- i,}) \ ~___~ __" ~ I PLAN'J ~~. ~'::Vi:LOPMENl S E:1VIC ES CITY OF CLEARWATER AugustS, 2004 ~ V,,~ ~ f~r1 Rick Glllelt Decade Gullcoast Hotel Parners, LP N 19W 24130 Rlverwood Drive, SUite 100 Waukesha, WI 53188 Subject PrOject Evaluation - PermIt Not Required Project Name Almlnar Inquiry Number EX 994 County Plnellas Secfrwp/Rge 17/29S/15E Latitude/Longitude 2r58'02 60"/82049' 12 88" Reference Rule 400-4 041, Florida Administrative Code (F A C ) Subsection 373406(6), Florida Statutes (F S ) Dear Mr Gillett The District has reviewed the Information you submitted on July 12, 2004 for the project referenced above and has determined that an Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) will not be required for the proposed demolition of the eXisting site and the cons!ructlon of the proposed bUilding with covered parking, which Will result In the decrease 01 vehicular use area and a 5 311 square foot total reduction In ImperVIOUS area The Information received by the Dlstnct will be kept In the Tampa Service Office to suppon the District's determination regarding your project The District's determination that youl project does not requlle an ERP IS only applicable oursuant to the statutes and rules In effect at the time the [nformatlon was submitted and may not be valid In the event subsequent changes occur In the applicable rules and statutes Additionally, thiS notification does no! mean lnat the District has determined that your proJect IS permanently exempt Trom permltllng requlremems An\} subsequent change you make In tne project's operation may neceSSllate further evaluation 01 permllllng by the District Therefore, you are advised to contact the District before beginning the project and before beginning any activity which IS not speCifically deSCribed In your submltlal Your timely pursuit of thiS activity IS encouraged to aVOid any ootentl21 rule changes that cO'Jld affect your request ThiS leller constliUl8S notice of Final Agency Action 01 tne project listed above A request fOI hearmg must (1) explam how Ihe substantial Intetests of each person requesting the he2rmg [VIII be affected by the Dlst/lct's action, or proposed actIOn, (2) stBIe all matene/lacts disputed by the petsan requestmg the heanng or stare thar there are no disputed lacts, and (3) othef1lVlse comply wd/l Chapter 28-106, FA C Caples of Sections 28-106 201 and 28-106 301 FA C are enclosed fOI your reference A request for heanng must be filed With (received by) the Agency Clerk of the District at the District's Broo!.;svlile address Within 21 days of receipt of thiS notice J \~ Permit No EX 99,1 Augusl 5, 2004 Page 2 fmlE ORIGINAL Receipt IS deemed to be the fifth day arter the date on WhlCllU1IS notice IS depOSIted In the United Stales mall Failure to file a request for heanng within this time period shall constitute a waiver of any right you or such person may have to request a hearing under Sections 120 5S9 and 12057, F S Mediation pursuant to Section 120573, F S , to settle an administrative dispute regarding the District's action In Ihls matter IS not available Enclosed IS a "Noticing Packet" thaI provides Inform atlon regarding the District Rule 400-1 1010, F A C , which addresses the notl/lcatlon of persons whose substantial Interests may be affected by the District's action In thiS malter The packet contains gUidelines on how to provide notice of the District's acllon, and a notice that you may use If you have questions regarding thiS matter, please contact Richard MAlt, P E, at the Tampa Service Of lice, extension 2045 Please reference the PrOject Name and InqUiry Number In future communications concerning thiS project ~ Alba E Mas, P E, Director Tampa Regulation Department AEM RMA elb Enclosures NotiCing Packet (42 00-047) Section 28-106 201 and 28-106 301, F A C InqUiry No EX 994 Frank R RaCine, Keith Zayac & ASSOCiates, Inc cc ~ 850 Bayway - ,; ='~. · ~~~ - D jjjp.iiiiinQiiiiO. ,-,,,, rr-:l1 7\J 11'1 If\ ~ ~ "" ... ~~n I J --.... I ~ AI' m If) . .---5 r--------------------- -------'[n I I II i i : [I ,~ ,II r ~ ~ · v-v -1/--11 'I j~ i ~d ~ I 8 ~ [Fli ! Q-I ~: - ! n / I! U I'" " ,,~ II.: I II I : ~ / ~a i I ~ [ &1 I V ~ I , m ! n I I I IL.!:::=II r;:1 1.., I I I ~------l-, I L, I I I I I I ~------~ : ( I It _________r r'l I ~ DODDO 0' Is r tD l> -< ~ -< tD r IU t; , Ii n ~~ . / I! U ; I I : I I I I I I I I '" Ii n ~ i =u mm- I I I I L ;:1.1 ~ V L!: / ~ [ tD J>. -< E J>. I -f m ~ J>. -< Ii' [ / ! u ~ - L.____ ( I I I I L_______________________ ----- U I /..... "" ~ - t- <[ ~ () ~ - w n () o " " U) <:[ ~ <:[ ALMINAR RESIDENCES 4 sUITEs FLORIDA 6lJ1LDlNG CODE. 2"''''1 EDITION INCLUOING TJ4E FLORIDA ACCE&e161Llrr CODE NFFA 101, LIFE SAFETY CODE, 20tZl12> EDITION ~IMAFrr Cl-4APTER: 30 NEW APT aLOGIS OCCUFANc'r CL.A56lFlcATION ENCL08ED BUILDING AREA TE~ AREA TOTAL BUILDING AFeA FiE&ID5NTIAL I-IIGI-IR;I.5E ~,6S8 5F 13,&35 5F 112>6.4$ 5F AFT ~IONe . 2l2W SF FEflt FE~ ~ ELEV. l,el' NGVD ( AE) ELEv. 112>,el' ~'_I2'>U AeoVE 6A.eE FLOOD ELEV htW'-0" ABOVE 6A.5E FLOOD ELEV. FOR: TURIT 9 STORIES PLUS ROOF AND ELEVATOR MECI-lANICAL LEVEL. MAX. BUILDING I-IT BY CODE. 11ZltZl' ABOve eASE FLoaD eLEv. OCCUPANT LOAD. ELEVATION 15T FLOOR< FLOOD ZONE BUILDING I-IEIGd-4T. TYPE OF CONSTRJCTI0N ALL0WA6LE FLOOflt I..OAD DESIGN WIND LOADS TYPE II SEE &TRUCTURAL PLANS BY O.c:. OLSEN .t: A55OC. DETE~INED BY TJ4E PROVlelON.e. OF ASCE 1 (l61D611 Fee) FULLY FI!le 5PRINKLERED 6l.0GI PER OCC/NFF'A101 (~-3.5) FULLY FIRE ALAR"! ~CTED SLOG. PER: SCCINFPAI"1 (~-3.4) UNIT EXIT ACCESS,. TWO fiiEMOTE EXIT 5T All"i: TOlLEl"i:5 ARE ~ffiOCIF TOlLERS OFF Al HR FIRE RATED EGJFii!E&e CORfiClDOR PER Fee 10/Zl5.5 BUILDING AREA TABULATIONS 5F'ACEe UNITe ENCLO&ED SLDG TE~ OCCUPANT Tou.eR:. AREA (SF) GrR:O&e AREA (eF) LOAD PAJ;1KING LEVEL 1 16 14,611 '" - PAFCKING LEvcL 2 16 14,611 frJ - TYPICAL LEVEL 3 I-IOTEL 5U1fE!, 5 1"',610 3,,11 ,,, TYP!CAL LEVEL 4- CONDO UNITe 3 ~,'IS l,IfltZl 6" TYPICAL LEVEL & CONDO UNITS, 3 '3,29" 2,21(l) f,6 1""r"F'ICAL LEvcL b CONDO UNITe 3 11,2~ 2,6612) 10 l-lOTEL SUlTEe 1 TYPICAL LEVEL 1 CONDO UNITS 3 112'>,1'304 lAS0 61 TYPICAL LEVEL e CONDO UNITe 2 9,385 2,&$ 60 FENTl-lOUSE LEVCL '3 CONDO UNITS I '''6frJ ~3 1-'3 TOTAL eulLDING l-lOTEL. surrES UNITS . h UN!TS TOTAL aulLDING RESIDENTIAL UNITe 15 UNITS TOT AI.. ENCLOSED BUILDING: AREA ~,65e SF TOTAL TE~5 eulLDING AFeEA 13,635 SF TOTAL OCCl..IPANT LOAD: ~ HOTEL PAFCKING, .:& 5PACE5 (lNCLUD!NG: lHC) CONDO PAFCKINGI 3(l) 5PACES (INCLUDING I f.IC) "~~~_____J : ~ {\. tr , r--~- I I I i . -- -~ --- ----- --- ~- Q III ~! ~ Q ~: ... I o I I I 1 I I I : I I I : H I I , I I I I : I I I : I I I I - ~ , ii :II~" Q ,lintS III Q .(7{f - Q I I I I I I ~__ L __ -- -- ---.., --- I I I I I I I I I ---l I I I I I I Oi ~ <P I I I I I I I I I I . I I I 1 I I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 i I I I I i I I I, I I I _.J -- -- ~- --- a' I Gi :;;: ~ r---- ----------------- ------..., i ~ .0.0 o~ ;i ..... ..... J~ iji ~ ..... ..... - _::i - .0.0 ..... ..... iF ~ I~ ..... Ui Ii~! Jl ..... ~ ~ ~ i: 0) ..... ~ t:ii I ..... 0;:; Q) ..... &l l ..... .0.0 ~ ~ l ..... !::! &- - - ..... ..... ~ ~ l I L_~__ ~~ i~ li-):l ~;JI q1t ~~ L_____________________________~ to.) ., ti :1 ~ :1 ~ .. }lO. ~ 2 3 3 J ~ B ~ I I I 4r4 4: 4- +- +- ~ +- +- +- + +- 4- il i~ II !I!! i~ !! !~ !! i! i~ 11 II ~ !;C!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !I i :...... I N3'! ,I ...... I - ! - I -- I .., I .., I .., 1.....1 - : ii i Ii ' I -I i i i i i i i ' " I I I I I I I 1 I I I I - III . L......J..J L.....W L-..I....I I I I I 1 11 - - I-- - ::::::l ~tB ~ j j B ~ I I I I 3) EEl 83J 83', lEE r I I I I 1 1 1 I ....- - m8m' 0 i-- - TI I- - 0 i-- - m8m i-- - JJ '-- - 0 I 1 B83JEBJ83 [8301 r-- - i-- - B ... =. i-- - B B --l I L..- - ~ I --' I I I I I I ---, ~ = 3 ~' < = , ........ --, ~ I! I ...., I II '" l- I ~ c- - . - c Fe "- =': II- 3 I i~ n 1;]1 IOJIDB]~ffi I I t-- I OJ ID[}3 [}3 - =t l- I-- ---t f- I-- ---l I t:: I- LUI OJIDEBEErn ~ [JJ[[] [[] ~ I = =H ~ ~ ~ =[]OJOJ ==- - ff' =0' I .. ... ... I I I I t I I III1I I I I I I ii iiB I I III i ~ I I Iii II J I I · I II I E I I & I II . i I I "I 1ft ..~ <P S-t 11(.. m III r m II ~ It -t 2 ;:g 4- il is il '-II I" It , , i 111''''' I lNI' , , i! I , I , I I , I , } t : 1 ! I: 4-'1" 4- Ii iJ iJ Ii ii Ii ii i i! il '.. i'" i" i" i" i. i'" il i! i! j I I I I I J 1 II IN/' ! _ I - I - I - I 11''''' I Nt' I-I "., I , i-I ' i i i i 1 i i 1 i i 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i III: III! )Em )Em Jm3J 1m I I ~ I I I iii~iiii ii~ I I I I I I I , II i I I I I ; I Ii I I J ~ ai' I I I; I . ~ i I I :1 i liS :i ~ .. J>. ~ 2 l4> t } + I f I : I .. . il it II 'I i! !~ i~ i! i~ !! !~ it il II I-II I~ ,I I I I I I I I I II ie i- ! INJ'! i "., i "., i "., i .., i "., i - i NI' 1- i - i ii ; !i i i -j i i i i i i I Iii i i i i i i i 1m I Jim OJ bJ mm OJ[)BB OJrnQ3[t3 OJ[)E8B I I iiiiiiii !i I I I I Ii! 'I iI i I J: II' E I I; I . . i I I I i I I B I :1 m ~ liS ~~~ .. m 'l!~ r- EfEI33 ~ ~ I ~ IIC EfEI33 ~ ~ ~ 2 ~E33 ! I I ' , I I , , I ! i I j ,-, .,..,. ,I I ,I II il !ll II I 4> f ]I ;:g I I , , I I I I i i i -i I ..... I ..... I ..., I ....... I I I I l I I I 1i !~ !i !i I.. I.. I.. I. t . t t I 11 II I I , I , I , I I .... I .... I .... I I , , 'j 'i !i I.. I. I. t +- +- I . , I , I , I I I I I I..... I I-I 1 it i<< !I I I! II +- 1- + iiiiillil ji~ I I I I I I I -. ~ Ii; I I sill I I J ; I II i i I I S I I i I I CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE A VENUE, CLEAR WATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX. (727) 562-4576 WWW MYCLEARWATER COM Apn129.2004 Decade ProoertIes Inc N19 W24130 Rtverwood Dr #100 Waukesha. Wi 53188 RE' FLD2004-04026 -- 850 BA YW A Y BLVD -- Letter of Completeness Dear Decade PropertIes Inc : The Plannmg Staff has entered your applIcatIon mto the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2004-04026 After a prelIrmnary review of the submitted documents, staffhas determmed that the applIcatIOn IS Complete. The Development ReView CommIttee (DRC) Will review the applIcation for sufficiency on June 10, 2004, m the Plannmg Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the MWlicipal ServIces Bwldmg The buildmg is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in downtown Clearwater. Please call Sherry Watkms, AdmInlstrative Analyst, at 727-562-4582 no earher than one week pnor to the meetmg date for the approxrmate time that your case will be reviewed Yau or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regardIng your application Additional comments may be generated by the DRC at the tune of the meeting. Uyou have any questions, please do not heSItate to contact me at 727-562-4836 or MIke.Reynolds@myclearwater com Smcerely yours, h/~VJ.~ Mike Revnolds. AICP Seruor Planner Leller of Completeness - FLD2004-04026 - 850 BA YW A Y BLVD CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDlNG 100 SOUTH MYRTLE A VENUE, CLEAR WATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE' (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 WWW MYCLEARW A TER COM Apnl 29. 2004 Decade Prooerties Inc N19 W24130 RIverwood Dr #100 Waukesha. Wi 53188 RE' FLD2004-04026 -- 850 BA YW A Y BLVD -- Letter of Completeness Dear Decade PropertIes Inc' The Plannmg Staff has entered your applIcatIOn mto the Department's filIng system and assIgned the case nwnber' FLD2004-04026. After a prehmmary reVIew of the submitted documents, staff has determmed that the apphcation IS Complete. The Development Review CommIttee (DRC) WIll review the applIcatIon for sufficiency on June 10, 2004, m the Plannmg Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the MunICIpal ServIces BUIldmg. The buIldmg IS located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue III downtown Clearwater. Please call Sherry Watlons, AdnllllistratIve Analyst, at 727-562-4582 no earlIer than one week pnor to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case WIll be reviewed You or your representative (as apphcable) must be present to answer any questIons that the DRC may have regardmg your applIcatIon AddItional comments may be generated by the DRC at the time of the meetmg If you have any questIOns, please do not heSItate to contact me at 727-562-4836 or Mtke.Reynolds@myclearwater com Sincerely yours, /?J/~ P'/w ~ Mike Revnolds. AICP Semor Planner Leiter of Completeness - FLD2004-04016 - 850 BAYWA Y BLVD CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 WWWMYCLEARWATERCOM Apnl 29, 2004 Decade Pronerties Inc N19 W24130 RIverwood Dr #100 Waukesha. Wi 53188 RE FLD2004-04026 -- 850 BA YW A Y BLVD -- Letter of Completeness Dear Decade Properties Inc The Planmng Staffhas entered your applicatIon mto the Department's filmg system and assigned the case number FLD2004-04026 After a prehmmary review ofthe submitted documents, staffhas detemllned that the applicatIon IS Complete. The Development ReView Comnnttee (DRC) Will reView the applicatIon for sufficiency on June 10, 2004, III the Planmng Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the MUnIcipal Services Bmldmg. The bUIldmg is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue m downtown Clearwater Please call Sherry Watkms, Admlll1stratIve Analyst, at 727-562-4582 no earherthan one week pnor to the meetIng date for the approxrmate time that your case Will be reViewed You or your representatIve (as applIcable) must be present to answer any questIons that the DRC may have regardmg your applicatIon AddItional comments may be generated by the DRC at the time of the meetmg If you have any questIons, please do not heSItate to contact me at 727-562-4836 or MIke.Reynolds@myclearwater com. Smcerely yours. 11I1-~ 11, ~ Mike Revnolds. AICP Senior Planner Let/erofCompleteness - FLD2004-04026 - 850 SA YWA Y BLVD CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIP AL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE A VENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562A576 WWWMYCLEARWATERCOM Apn129,2004 Decade Prooerties Inc N19 W24130 Rtverwood Dr #100 Waukesha Wi 53188 RE FLD2004-04026 -- 850 BA YW A Y BLVD -- Letter of Completeness Dear Decade Properties Inc The Plannmg Staffhas entered your apphcatlon mto the Department's fihng system and assIgned the case number FLD2004-04026. After a prehmmary reVIew of the submitted documents, staff has detenmned that the apphcation IS Complete The Development ReView Comrmttee (DRC) will reVIew the applicatIOn for sufficiency on June 10, 2004, m the Planrnng Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the MUnIcipal ServIces Buddmg. The bUlldmg IS located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue m downtown Clearwater Please call Sherry Watkins, Admmistrattve Analyst, at 727-562A582 no earlier than one week pnor to the meetmg date for the approxtrnate time that your case Will be revIewed You or your representative (as apphcable) must be present to answer any questIons that the DRC may have regardmg your applIcatIon AddItIonal comments may be generated by the DRC at the time of the meetIng If you have any questions, please do not heSitate to contact me at 727-562-4836 or MIke Reynolds@myclearwater com Smcerely yours, h,-~ VJ~ ~ MIke Revnolds. AICP SenIor Planner Leller ofCompleleness - FLD2004-04026 - 850 BA YWA Y BLVD PERMITS 319-04 Keith Zayac & Associates., Inc. CIVIl Engmeermg, Landscape Architecture, Plannm!,: ] 0 I PhlIJppe Ph.\\)', Ste 205 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 (727) 793-9888 Phone (727) 793-9855 Fax keithzayac!alaol com Mr. Richard Alt, P.E. Soutb\\'est Florida Water Management District 7601 Highway 301 North Tampa, Florida 33637.6759 (813) 985 7481 AprIl 27,2004 _f// Re: Alminar (Clearwater, Florida) SWFW:MD ApplicatIOn No. TO BE ASSIGNED KZA Project No. 319-04 Dear Mr A It Please accept thIs transmittal as a fonnal req uc...t for Issuance of a letter from S WFWMD mdlcatlOg NO PERMIT REQUIRED To tIllS effect, Ihl.: lollowlOg are enclosed/attached · Two (2) caples of 8 5- X 11'. aena]s mdlcatmg eAlsting condItIons · T\\o (2) copies of 1] X] 7 sun ey IndlLdtmg C'\lstmg conditions · Two (2) copIes of 1 ] X] T sae plan llldlcatll1g proposed condItIons . Two (2) copIes of locatIOn map · One (1) copy of Pennlt ]nqUlry Check] 1St AddItIOnally, the fol]owmg table summanzes the existing and proposed conditIOns I EXISTll'-'G PROPOSED COI\DITIOj'.~ CONDITIONS Total ImpervIOus Area I 2].934 17,442 (re) Paved Area (re) 1 ]6283 2863 Total Site Area (re) I 28.904 28,904 ,,"'" Thank you for your assIstance \.\Jth thIs project Please contact us If there are any questIOns Case Number: FLD2004-v4026 -- 850 BA YW A Y BL YO Owner(s) Decdde PropertIes Inc N I 9 W24130 Rlvcrwood Dr #100 Wdukc~ha, WI 53188 TELEPHONE No Phone, FAX No FdX, E-MAIL No Emdll Applicant Jeff Kelerlcber 240 BdYSldc On vc Clearwdter, Fl33767 TELEPHONE 727-46 I -2921 , FAX 262-522-8999, E-MA IL No Emall Location: Lo~,;..~ ~ /v)//k'1...- ",r rk Cb ~ ~~ ~r- 'I.Ay 6 DO .,J!..I!41r r;-- ~ ~ ~ <Yf'"; a.- r./ Atlas Page: 2858 ~r -, _ ...f ~ LLc tc /..e-V' V'~. Zoning District: T, Tounst ~~I Request: 6//'fyJF~..I-t"';V" :?~~ tl tZ-~nv;.J 7i>v- IT ~ ~~;JJ ~ a'A/..vI()I"~t tA~ tZ- ..6 -,I'~;., ~fd..r tP/ 7b b~r Ic#v.J-b i. ?@ifA- If~) )'/LrJ roo/ W,-"Itt.,.e",~. Proposed Use: IT ~ I'L-, ~ ~ c...-.,;i- J Neighborhood No Neighborhood AssocatlOn Data Association(s): ! Presenter: Mike Reynolds, Semor Planner I I r~ aJJN'f ~ ~ L fA [VP/ Development Review Agenda - ThursddY, June 10,2004 - Page 8 pdf) /.JV-~/()~ " I' I I , '(I' / I "" I, , ij ;>;;J I(i '/Il '.. U' " 0 " 'I' ~ I , ~ it I, 'I I, i-" ~ ", - , , / " 11 'I ~ I, :1 'I ro II ~ ,: ~ I ! , I' / I f~ '\ I, f, ~: / ! If ~I- : '\ I . , , ,~ , 1 / I , I: !: ~:< II r] , ('\ ~ ' \) t ;r :1) ~ d ~ 01 \I TlI j .,..~ t'J :t ~ -)0 .-I )>- 1\ ,...j~ lfI l' "'10 V1 m (p~ I II il 'I I, :1 1i , ' l' , t GI , I o ~ -'t '0 - ~~ " <-~~ ~ A -; ~~ ~~ 'i .;: 3:il' ~ t .. r" ... i ^' '" \fl ~ mN <::"'O~~ ;J~O~ (\ ;~~~ l) 00-" W~i1I ~f ~0 1"l,'O'O s-I> ....f1J )- C'> \iii (11~ O~'C..l. ~ ~ f'\1 ~Q rSl z. i\ i 'j::. Ii' fN tO~ >~ ! 6~ I ",7'" I g i r. i (;'> , -:'0 U~ ~c m bjWtJ m &1 ('\ ~ '1 / Pmellas County Property Appra1<;:er InformatIOn 17 29 15 05058 004 0130 I' Page 2 of 4 o' 17 / 29 / 15 / 05058 / 004 / 0130 IH-Sep-2004 J~M SM~th, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 18:58.07 Ownership InforMation Non-Residential Property Add ress~ Use. and Sales DECADE PROPERTIES INC OSK: 08012 OPG' 1432 N19 W24130 RIUERWOOO DR IUOO WAUKESHA WI 53188-1131 COMparable sales value as Prop Addr: 850 BAVWAV BLUD of Jan 1, 2003, based on Census Trae t ' 260.02 sales froM 2002 - 2003: 0 Sale Date OR Book/Page PrJ.ce (Qual/UnQ) Vac/IMp Plat InforMat~on 8 /1.992 8.012/1.432 605,500 (U) I 1960, Book 055 Pgs 019-020 12/1.990 7.463/1.942 45~000 (U) I 0000 Book Pgs - 6 /1.987 6~523/2.058 1.000 (U) I 0080, Book Pgs - 9 11.981 5.250/1. 060 1.100~000 (U) I 2004 Value EXEMP nONS Just/Market' 1. 851.600 HOMestead' NO OwnerShip 1: .000 Govt ExeM NO Use 1:, 000 Assessed/Cap' 1.851.600 Inst~tut~onal ExeM. NO Tax ExeMpt 1:: .000 Histor1c EX8M, 0 Taxable, 1.851.600 AgriCUltural, 0 2003 Tax InforMat1on DJ.strJ.ct CW Seawall Frontage. Clearwater View, 03 Millage. 23.0851 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Pr1ce UnJ.ts Meth 03 Taxes, 36.128.18 1) 240 x 120 15.00 28.800.00 S 5pecJ.al Tax .00 2) o x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 W1thout the Save-Our-HoMes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2003 taxes wJ.Il be 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 36.128.18 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00 W1thout any exeMpt1ons, 2003 taxes w111 be 36.128.18 Short Legal BRVSIDE SUB NO. 6 UNIT C BLK D~ LOTS 13~14 AND 15 Descr1pt1on AND LOT 12 OF BLK 0 BAYSIDE SUB NO 6 UNIT A Building Information http IIpao co pmellas fl uslhtbmlcgt-scr3?o=l&a=l&b=I&r=&s=l&u=0&p=17+29+15+05 9/1/2004 Pmellas County Property AppraJ<::.er InformatIOn 1729 15050580040130 " ~ Page 3 of 4 ProQerty and Land Use Code descnQtIOns 17 I 29 I 15 / 05058 / 004 / 0130 :01 01-Sep-Z004 JiM SMith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appra1ser 18:58:07 COMMerc1al Card 01 of 1 IMproveMent Type, Hotel/Hotel < 4 St Proper ty Address, 850 BAY""'A'i B LUD Prop Use: J1 3 Land Use: 39 Structural Elements FoundatJ.on Floor SysteM Exterior Wall Height Factor Party Wall Structural FraMe Roof FraMe Roof Caver Cabinet & Mill Floor Finish Inter10r FJ.nJ.sh Total Un1ts Spread/Hono Footing Slab on Grade Cone Block/Stucco o None Hasonry Pillar&Steel Bar Joist/Rigid FraN Bu~lt Up/Hetal/Gyps A...erage Carpet Combinat10n Drywall Z5 Heat1ng & A1r Heating&Cooling Pckg F:n:tures 97 Bath T1le Electr1c Shape Factor Quality Year Built Effective Age Other Deprec1ation Funct10n Deprec1ation EconoMJ.c Deprec1at1on Floor + Half A...erage Rectangle A...erage Wall 1.971 15 o o o Sub Areas Description Factor Area Descr1pt1on Factor Area 1) Base A rea 1.00 171715 n .00 0 2) Open Porch .30 5.820 B) .00 0 3) .00 0 9) .00 0 4) .00 0 10) .00 0 5) .00 0 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 Commercial Extra Features Description DiMensions Pr1ce Un1 ts Value RCD Year 1) POOL iZ. 500.00 1 0 9,250 1. 994 2) PATIO /D ECK 450SF 3.00 450 0 1,000 1. 994 3) DOCK 15.00 41600 0 Z7,600 1. 971 4) ASPHALT 9500 1. SO 9.500 0 14, Z50 99'9 5) ELEU PASS ZOOOLBS 30,000.00 1 0 22,200 11994 6) ELEU STOP 4 STOP 3,500.00 4 0 101360 1. 994 TO TA L RECORD VALUE' 84.660 Pin ell as County Property Appraiser Parcel Information http Ilpao co pmellas fl uslhtbm/cgl-scr3?o=1&a=l&b=I&r=&s=l&u=0&p=17+29+15+05 9/112004 -;J Pmella~ County Property AppraJ<;er InformatiOn 1729 15050580040130 Back to Search Pag~ An explanation of thiS screen http IIpao co pmellas fl uslhtbm/cgl-scr3?o=l&a=l&b=1&r=&s=l&u=0&p=17+29+15+05 Page 4 of 4 91112004 r. ... Aerial Map Owner: I Decade Properties Inc. I Case: Property Size (Acres) : FLD2004-04026 0.66 acres Site: 850 Bayway Boulevard PIN: 17/29/15/05058/004/0130 I A tIcs Page: 285B .. '" ~ ^' filii /!I\!J ~ Location Map 850 Bayway Boulevard lease Property Size (Acres) o 66 acres Owner I Decade Properties Inc Site FlD2Q04-Q4026 PIN 17/29/15/05058/004/0130 I Atlas Page 2858 ..- I I U A fllft /!NJ ,.' p ... ~ _\ \ 1...-\ I r , -, )r t...": -:""JJ L_ J~~'" -, r ~l~""~-L....--r-~I.J 1..-1 I r---""~-..f----{I 't -l__"'__~_.r"":-L_~__I i.~ I J' I~ I ...I '1 ! -~~.... 1 I I I", ---.., ", I I I 1- t ..~ t "I " ..... l .....Ir;c. I i~--- _'Ii.- - I '" ""L_ It-ru;-? \ ; [ ~ t ] ~ IJ ; , ~ '" LVD ~ '" '" Zoning Map Owner Decade PropertIes Inc Case FlD2004-Q4026 Site 850 Bayway Boulevard Property Size {Acres} o 66 acres PIN 17/29/15/05058/004/0130 I Atlas Page 285B .' r- I I IJ ~ II WA TER WA TER ~ r, I I I-.J I I L~ " , -'", , , -' , RFH 1.-, I ~ \- ,-' I , I I \ I I r I L L: "':..1 r~l_ -, '- .- ~ 'I , I~ ~ I rl ... I " -1 I I I I I J ~ .... III Ll. 5 (!) r~""".'''I'''-,. 1 r r\ ~ I ' r' l l j ~ I I 1_ ~ . ~ l-r-----'_, I I I f.----...--~L-l I t L 1 II I ~I I I L"'-...... 1)::1 ....1 L 1 1):lI j.l'" I -\1r ......L_ I RH '" '" 41-_ , i r , , , , ~ j L .., " " " '" '" .'!: '" 1;, I '" r , I I I I I L, ,I I r-------'--_~ RFH RH Future Land Use Map Site 850 Bayway Boulevard I Case Property SIze (Acres) FlD2004-04026 Owner Decade Properties lnc o 66 acres PIN 17/29/15/05058/004/0130 I A tics Page 285B ,~ II U A !i\fi/ I!I\!J Clearwater Harbor ~ n Attachod--I , "f'" '-, Dwellings r \, --, \ \ ___I '" Attached rl-'--L ~-~ .J-, r'--""-,_'_....--I__trwellll1gs' --1_ L r----....--~----tl \ 1___""-_~..rL-___J ! r ,J r' 1 - 1 I, J 1 1 "J I "I 1 _ I 1 ---1 r,--, : I...J: I ~ C"t l.j I .... ,r.. l .J CI:I -, I 1 1 I 1 1 J ~ ..,J D:l l.&.. ::: (!J ~_r"1. r,_; \ , r L I"' t I ~ ~ r ~ 1- ~ -~-------, '" 1 1 I---~---l...._ 1 : A tached i 1 ellings i I 1 '" '" ~....--...........- , , J , -,!; t ,\ II L J ~ I , , , , J l?: ., S GULFVIEW aL VD " ., '" ii -----_1""------'-, r 1 I (L 1 I rl r' I ~ 1 1 I I"' : 'i 1 1 Existing Land Use Map Owner Decade Properties Inc Case FlD2004-04026 Site 850 Bayway Boulevard Property Slze{Acres) o 66 acres PIN 17/29/15/05058/004/0130 Atlas Page 2856 ... Views looking north (top) and northwest (bottom two photos) 850 Bayway Boulevard FLD2004-04026 " . ~ , I ~ ' Sarasota Miami . Ne,w,York ~ 1- ~ 1543 Second Street - , 1 ~ ,"..,.. ... Sarasota Florida 34236 ,I 941 9574477 fax 9419574151 '. glllettardl com , AAOO02317 AA0007496 . \ In.,,, -'" , , .' :>- ,... " ~;I! h" :f~!k (I 'I II I ~' 8/25/04 ~~;I:;' 1f.~"1' To CIty of Clearwater Pland~hg Dept Re Almmar ~~, Case # fld2004-04026-850 ~yway blvd ~ I!t )~il'l ThIS letter IS m response to ~jannmg Dept comments dated 8/11/04 \\11, Traffic Engmeenng 11~1; ~ ' I" I Please find enclosedl~vlsed parkmg plan that Illustrates parkmg space dnnensIOns ~l:li t 3 Please find enclosed'Jlevlsed parkmg plan that Illustrates turning radIUs 4 Please find enclosed,i~vIsed parkmg plan that Illustrates column locations 5 Please find enclosedjl~vlsed parkmg plan that Illustrates clear ceiling height of8'-2" t'I'r\ ~,: Plannmg '!'il. I Please find enclosed,~vlsed color elevatIOn that Illustrates dimensIOns 2 Please find enclosed\'. vIsed sIte plan that Illustrates we have elImmated the 1 I plaza on the front err 1,. no front setback reductIOn IS reqUIred 3 Please find enclosedi~: 'vIsed elevations that Illustrate the bUIlding height 15 1 ' 49' \ 1,,1 4 Please find enclosed ~I vIsed Site plan that Illustrates the hotel parking IS 7 spaces , ' I 5 The DRC agreed tha~I'only one color "front" elevatIOn IS reqUIred 6 The first seven spac9~IIn the garage are for the hotel function The entry gate has a phone fortpproved access Issued With registratIon 7- Same access for botl1~ses Parkmg garage IS secure completely so gate access IS on approve~"key card or phone approved basIs, of course, It can have EMSlFlre overn(fe IJil ~ GIllett Associates ! ARDT GROUP ORIGINAL ArchItecture Urbanism Design Ir.lCOFlPOR.....'ED f~Pl~ -'"' - - ....- D. ~(C~~~ff~ P c':1 -- J LJ' 0 r ~ 1,3 L- I PLA,' "OPMENl - -' on vr v__- .,WATER Sincerely, ,,' 41il .~ Ii I~fl!' 1 i1' i~: ~!lil: ~ 'I~ I~ll: '~ I ,d 11'111 ~ Ill" " Richard C Glllett President Jlg:iJ 1'dN/9/GO ~ ~ \ \1\ t'- III ~. ~. """ ~i ~ \}\, ~ ~ ~ , ~..-.~..; , . : -I -' 57~+" f~n ~ :..-.:-~.... ..... ....... i~ t I ! o. .21 ;; .::::; . ;; ;: j;; ~ ! H ~~~~1i.U~~~:i '! .., "~~,i~~' ~Ot U; !: ~ J~ i~ 5~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~~ ~i ~ is ~~~ g~~! '! s'~~H - n ~ "l;"'ll ~ '€ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ h ~p ~ < ! i f i ~~iii~!!~H u IE!; ,55 ~ ~~ ~ i~5ii.1 Ui~! ~ ~~ : h; q :~ n ~ ~ q l~nl3 i !l :~ I:Hg li iD . I~H' i U ~ lip i Hj: ~~ ~ ~; H II .. - ~ ~ ~l i 6; ~ 5 ~ i~ ~ o E i~ ! '" ~;' i a~ ~ '. . ~; ~i i ~ ~ a~ i . lq f' gi; 3. l . ~ ~ ~ I HnH ~~6.l<DI: i R~; n~ il =~ ~ t ~ J ~~ = .~ . a' ~ a!; ~ e! ~ H- i !~ ~ ~i - QIll' ~~ ~ ~; ~ i : 'g A ~ o ia E i ~ ~ ~ r I ~ il ~ I'N'~ ~ n ~ ~ Ii'.... ~ o c ~ ~ c )II ~ ~ e nl i ~ -l~H ~~g~ ~ ".> ~~<~~ ~ ~~~ nili 'I i ~g n~i: l ~ ;r~!~ ~ ~ t- e ~ ~ 'S~ . il~ ~p~.~i ~8~t\'!M ~ ~~~~~ a I ~- ! ~ 5il : 0 . '\rl'"'>.'t\1 r i ~ i ~ h ~ ~ x i I ~. j i~l!n ~ ! ~ ! . ~ ! . I ~L M I; ~ ~ ~~ .~ o Ie ~ PAl( Ol5OIIPllON CITY or CILARWATER SITE PLAN KLJTH 7.A Y AC.. ASSCXJATl:.5.ING DlnDI Cl.I.tOlASI' fI1Il'1. r~ LP. Cl'l/'U.Nr"..#<<.OIt,G LN..osc....rt....~III:(.tf1ut-tJ:!'. P'VN'H'. Nli , 2tt:m iIVDOOO DiIYt 3Jl'1'! 100 ___~L..._ IAumLl ,~ ~Et ~:=-::~ Al.MINAR -----.-- ~.....~ ""-l-""_._--._'~""", ~...............,.. 1111..11111111.11.111111 'i.i.'"~ iai~~"il Ci ,... UHfI f ~ UUf! f rU!d f -dil' '/~ .j ~" ijf ~ j ~, _.i: .. ~, " ~ij ~ ; ~ - FCn ~ On I (' I ~\ I ^' L 1\1011\1r\ . . i n il," fr iiiiliJ!i I ~ I fill: it; j ~I'i i!,i Ii I: J ~ ;: -- llll.!r" :"Ifil ~ i d J 1:1 z !If ~Ih:m =' iHJ i Iii rq,! IJ ~ f! ~ ,I :::; "n f'lr 1;, f ~'Ilf ! It IJ U ::""uu rifl frl'llffl 1flll - " 1111 !lll f · I) . I l t I i, H HIt rrii ~I : I: ~ iJI m : Ii ;f a If I II . I iI' i I'" I h I , ~ I,:; I d II fll qt ! . II . i I I J Ia P : ~I , I J i f j II rf l h I I f ~. II I . , I <D~ I ~ 0 ~ ." = (; t :' =-.u:..~ 1.':"- --- .." ~ ::: ~;tX.J.:;;~~-;i=~:: p......'" "',.,....- " Ii I' r ' , It U Ii i ., 'I Ii Ij'? lj If II' J" HiJl' !J" J' if I' I,i ~ I f I l II 'Pf ,. ~trlllll' '1 II .~ 7; J 1 I 11 If: J!' j , ! h t.; 'il It .! :t I all ! I H 'f ,. j il :'1 f I ~: 'f: if j Id: if i::f I Iii ~q IIH Ii il: I i I' t f:}1 I I I j,' 11 ,W I I II' 0 I'll I I If I 1 ""0 ; ii I J' Ii f~ I, I, :11:1' mi' IiH f I l!!l J ~ I It} " I' f 'I it j .J- . 1 ," 15 "rll i : II ' If if f j i 1l1' I,:, f I'll I t:l ! i ii ~ J f : j ~ i q " ~. j~ hi! i ,1,1 !:j ! f ., I I I: J I'll 1 i i J r!j~ I i I': !i~ L H I' 1- _. ~ . I I 11 ';' I I ,I I '. J "II II h i! II' :r, ,f! J i! i i 1 ;:{: ! j d ;i~ d !~ J :! o~ f . it i ! i ': I j;t: ; I :. !Ii Ilr! I ; I j I! J B 1 ,I I, t I j '! 'II :' ,t : I f 1.1 I ' . I! ~ III t I j' ! i i ~ I ~ I i H i {ol h. I I r.f t ~ t h I l LANDSCAPE PLAII KEJHl ZAYAC ..ASSOCIATE5.INC. oo:AJlg ClIIItll.\S! IIOTll PARMIIS. lP. CII'L t>GH.LnNG v.><>>< ""-""'tfl"tDUt. .........., lllIl ZllJlII\1IOOll IIIIVI, SUlI! 1110 _____ 1iUmU. ftImSlN ~88 :::::-- ,....'7'__ -- ALMIIIAR ...." .....-CLEARWATER. fLORIDA ... !I I, II ., , I II I ~ r> ,~.. \4 ... AI 11'1 If' o ~ J>. I :t o :;a I:~ -' G), 1[J: ., I ~ i\T 1ll If) ~--- ~ ,- --~