The URL can be used to link to this page

FLD2004-03018 C L W CoverSheet ~- FLD2004-03018 669 BAY ESPLANADE Date Received: 03/24/2004 LA RISA II ZONING DISTRICT: T LAND USE: RFH ATLAS PAGE: 258A PLANNER OF RECORD: MHR 1 October 15,2004 Community Development Board Clearwater, Flonda Dear Commurnty Development Board Member. I am WrIting tlus letter to let you know that I support the La RIsa II project in our neighborhood. I have been to the Community Development Meetings on this project and have been disappointed in staff's recommendation of denial This project is very nice In its design and would be a great asset to our community This area of Bay Esplanade needs to be cleaned up and this would be a good start to that. I live two doors from this project on the waterfront also. I am in the midst of doing a design for our property and because of the size and shape of the property will also have to go up to maximize this property I have heard rumors that the staff would lIke to see townhomes on these properties. Townhomes would not work here as back out parkmg is not really feasible - it is not a dead end street like Brightwater Right now there is too much parking on the street with a lot of back out parkmg. Also it is not financially feasible for the owners to put 2 or 3 townhomes on them as most have 4 or more rental urnts and need to get the density allowed by code (30 unIts per acre) to make It work. We have tried to combine properties along here hut it fell apart more than once and does not appear to be happemng, so individual lot owners are now starting to develop their own properties Don't try to make tlus a development area for only large projects (like Belle Harbor - a very nice development but talk about mass and height compared to thiS project) by denying the mdlviduallot owners (who most want to stay on their properties) the chance to develop their own parcels. And please don't turn this into another Brightwater Dnve! Thank. you for your time, ~{J~ !i-y-- Melodie Ferguson 665 Bay Esplanade #3 727-441.1475 I DJ~(C~~~~' <\ 0 ' OCT I 5 2004 IE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF CLEARWATER ORlG\NAL \, 10-14-04 CommUnity Development Board City of Clearwater I wish to again offer my SUpport for La Risa II which is I know In opposition to Planning Staffs recommendation of denial. Please fmd the followmg further opinIons I heard staff mention townhomes In the previous public meetings regardIng the La Risa II project and our neighborhood. My stomach turned when I heard this comment. I as well as my neighbors and I have talked with many of them absolutely do not want townhomes in our neIghborhood. All you have to do IS drive down Brightwater Drive to see why we would not embrace that concept. What you see IS a long solid wall of the same lookIng type of structure. You might remember that in the past thiS type of construction after some years gets called rowhouses and usually IS associated wIth slruns. Townhomes or rowhouses are not desirable or for that matter pleasant to live in for many reasons some of wlnch are as follows They are very narrow units; the ones on Bnghtwater are around 19 feet WIde. Think about spending the rest of you life in a home with no side wmdows. Windows are only III the front and the back of your long narrow house, what a dark and dreary enVlfonment Only the end two uruts might have side windows. By adding a couple of pIeces of property together you get very long runs of this type of construction all with the same type of look (boring) with little or no front landscaping and no side yards because you have taken away the side yards by combIning properties. You only have two Side yards at each end of a long, long run of same 0 looking houses thus rowhouses. Townhomes have back out on to street parking With several dnveways thus making for a more dangerous entry on to road also limiting drivers view of roadway and small chIldren behind cars. Townhomes usually have small backyards wluch eventually become junky storage areas. Structurally, townhomes are nowhere near as solidly bUllt as condommiums Townhomes, have wood roofs whereas good condominiums have concrete roofs. Condos have usually at least 25 foot deep concrete ptlmgs for stability vs the townhouse standard foundation approach. Elevators and stairs are very small and narrow ill townhomes making furniture moving extremely difficult. Semor citizens and many others prefer one level living over multi level umts. All the above has happened on Brightwater and the look has left me cold. Two comments have been made to me by others, the most recent being everybody knows that Brightwater IS a flop. They have basically created a canyon over there Another comment by another neighbor was that the townhomes looked hke three trailers stacked on top of each other. Well, beauty is in the eye of the beholder. If City planning staff in their profeSSIOnal opinion feels that thts is good development/redevelopment I would like to suggest a few upper level courses III community development and a visit to some other cities to help them. What is done IS done on Bnghtwater but the audacity to suggest that It be the grand entrance to the soon to be chen shed reSIdential neighborhood of Bay Esplanade is asmine. Please support La Risa II a good little condo project With some pizzazz setting the tone for some other nice Mediterranean condommium units to come. -" \ : ,:~~ I -:"';~: Ii ~\Jl ! ~ ,. 0'-; l \ ",-- \ I--li \'1/ IL \ ~. _.,..(' ,! l~ .' I I ~~~~ L=J tJ V L:::::J ! ~k~ j <, Robert M. Pennoc : J f~" ... I ' 665 Bay Esplanade # 3 i I 1 j I OCT' 5 2004 I Clearwater, Florida 33767 i ~ '-~ 0 FJ I GIN A L : PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT i\ I SERVICES CITY OF CLEARWATER ,'- 'L' ; '. Community Development Board Please note tlus IS the presentation I tried to give to your board at the last CDB meeting in September regardmg the La Risa II project. (I own the property two doors South of the La RIsa II project and live there full time) I ran out of time giving tlns presentation I want you to know I read tlus a couple of times out loud pnor to the meeting and accomplished It ill three minutes. I apologize for not being able to present it in the allotted time. Thank you for frmshmg my presentation. I hope it helps you In your deciSIOn makmg. \ A while back thiS board and the commuruty of which I am one supported, approved and actually commended the project La RIsa I. There were several reasons for this of which I WIsh to remmd you of a couple. First a beautiful design was created by the ardlltect working in conjunctIOn with the planning department and supported by them. ThiS design appeared to be setting the style and shape of things to come ill our neighborhood and was applauded pretty much by all. Secondly, the board and the community knew that what La Risa was replacing was and is a blighted area that IS definitely not a tounst area or for that matter a safe area. I want to state I have 23 pages of police calls to the Bay Esplanade area. Each page has approximately 55 separate police actIons regarding Bay Esplanade. This 23 pages is over a two year period but to narrow that down and put It m proper prospectIve It mcludes approXlffiately 330 incidences from the beginning of thIS year by the police department and 45 calls to one address alone over the past two years . That IS a huge amount of time, manpower and money that is spent In tlus area. I do not know how often the medical/ambulance emergency people have been here but I can tell you it is also a lot ThIs mdicates to me that a lot of tax dollars and government energy is going mto our area due to problems that will probably go away when this area is cleaned up and rejuvenated. La Risa I and II should get the ball rolling. The La Risa people are plannmg on puttmg nice pathways with benches and landscaping for public use along part of their property. I think that IS a very nice thing to do for the community in that there are a lot of semor walkers and others that could use a place to sit and take a rest break while on their walk. On the waterfront along With the La Risa II site is many other fallIng apart older apartment complexes and sort of I guess you would call them weekly motels, as well as condominiums When I say falling apart I am talking about many needing reparrs and very few bemg energy effiCIent or updated I think most all of us have single pane wmdows and that was very scary when we were faced WIth the hurricanes These places have no histoncal value or any claIm to fame and are functIonally and economically obsolete All the uruts across the street from La Risa I are waterfront unIts of which I am the co-owner of one four-plex apartment complex. We have talked WIth the Clty planning dept staff a couple of times over the past couple of years they were courteous frIendly and told us the following. First, that 6 stories over parkmg is the maximum a project should go due to safety and building code Issues That Beach by DeSIgn IS a fleXible thing and each development is looked at as an individual project These talks were not in general but III regards to my neighborhood, which OR\G\NAL ,. . mcludes not only me but La Risa II In Ollr talks WIth staffwe all agreed that La Risa had set the standard and that It looked like other projects m our area would probably have that Mediterranean flavor and the waterfront properties mcluding rmne would probably have that MedIterranean village look With 4-6 story smaller condomimum projects TIus IS what I was led to believe and I personally have now spent thousands of dollars getting ready to do something very similar to La RIsa II on my own property. I am not a developer but a small apartment house homeowner who will stay after I develop my property I know for a fact that this IS what some of my neighbors also intend on doing. I thmk it will be a very exqUisite neighborhood and a grand entrance into the residential commumty on Bay Esplanade north of us I do not think any of us want the townhome look of Brightwater Dr I personally think the townhomes on Brightwater drive look to pinched together and all the same lookmg for very long runs. One other neighbor told me that those townhomes on brightwater drive look like 3 trailers stacked on top of each other. I also do not think any of us property owners on North Clearwater Beach wIll give up 4 to 6 units to get 2 townhomes. The mam reason for that is the economics involved A piece of property With say 4 or 5 units on it and valued at say a million dollars plus can not be made to support the tearing down of this 4 or 5 uruts and the building of a couple of townhomes It Just does not pencil out. I thmk La RIsa II's deSign is fine. It feels upscale yet comfortable and fits In with the area that IS bemg created from JMC's developments on northward. You could get maybe two townhomes on thIS property and it would look very pinched together. Yet, by going up the developer and architect have made La Risa II come together and match and flow with La Risa I across the street. For not being able to combine all the properties in thiS area into one large property and developing another huge complex the design sets In motion a future flow of other small Mediterranean style condominium projects that should not only beautify the neIghborhood but also complement the La RIsa project. Lastly, thiS will also give people In the commuruty another type of place to hve other than in a huge complex or townhomes. I urge you to be Flexible and far thinkIng in your decisIOn Not all properties ill this area are the same size and these smaller properties may need more fleXibility than larger ones Please approve La RIsa II for the good of our neighborhood. Thank you for your time ~~ Robert M Pennock 665 Bay Espalnade # 3 Clearwater, Florida 33767 \ I~&-:' (/-\ r"1"":.J 1(""" _~.",~ I -""\' I '-- 'I ~ ~J 'J I L_ : ... , 'I l \ II ~ I ..;- I: \\{f I ~ , LJ J' I=:J 'Vj ,L~ L' \', !,-_ I ' , I '-" L..-, ~ -, I j II; >(' 1- -I! I ! lull OCT I 5 2004 i~ I ) I r I PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CllY OF CLEARWATER ORIGINAL 10-14-04 Development Board I would like at this time to offer my support of the LaRlsa II project It IS my understandmg that it has been recommended for denial due to mass and height I thmk It IS a nice lookmg project and not too masSIve or too tall for our neighborhood or Clearwater Beach. It complements La RIsa I's looks and makes for a nIce Mediterranean flavor that our community appears to be headmg towards. I own the property four properties away at 657 Bay Esplanade and again Wish to reiterate my support for the La Risa II project. We do not want townhomes and the Bnghtwater look lD our neighborhood for many reasons. -.~ elth ardlson 661 ay Esplanade # 3 Clearwater, Fl33767 (727) 510-9660 _.......----....------~------~~-- :: \"\~e~i!\\n~ rlru~~ II L )! b '-=:,;[~ U v ~J '[ -.. '..--- lu-u' lK:T 15m L/i I l . PLANNING & DEVELOPMENl SERVICES CITY OF CLEARWATER RadclIffe Development Approval r::ondltlons Page 1 of 2 ... \ Reynolds, Mike From. Sent To Cc Subject Troy J Perdue [troYP@JPflrm com] Saturday, October 09, 2004 9 44 AM Reynolds, Mike Gerlock, Chip RE Radcliffe Development Approval Conditions That's fine Thanks for the update -----Onglnal Message----- From: Mike Reynolds@myClearwater com [mallto Mike Reynolds@myClearwater com] Sent: Fnday, October 08, 2004 3 25 PM To: Troy J Perdue Cc: Chip Gerlock@myClearwater com Subject: RE' Radcliffe Development Approval Conditions Troy, Attached to this e-mail IS the set of approval conditions sent to the CDS for the October 19, 2004 CDS meeting We did not Include Items 15 and 16 as you proposed as they do not fit within the purpose of conditions of approval Please contact me with any questions that you might have Thank you Mike Mike Reynolds, AICP, Senior Planner City of Clearwater - 727-562-4836 mike reynolds@myclearwatercom -----Onglnal Message----- From: Troy J Perdue [mallto troyp@Jptirm com] Sent: Thursday, October 07,20046 28 PM To: Reynolds, Mike Subject: Radcliffe Development Approval Conditions MIke, here are the two additional conditions that we dIScussed thIS afternoon Keith Zayac Will be provldmg the RevISed Site Plan Drawmg to you wIthm the next week Thank you for mdudmg these conditions If you have any questions or comments regardmg the additions, please let me know as soon as possible Thanks CondItion # 14 ApplIcant shall InStall a SIX foot brIck wall at the Southern boundary of the Property consIstent WIth the reVISed Site Plan, so as to restrIct pedestrian traffIc onto the adjacent southern property 10/1112004 RadclIffe Development Approvtll ConditIOns Page 2 of 2 15 Apphcant shall restrIct the use of the docks from loud musIC, parhes or other assemblages of persons, all consIstent WIth the apphcahon 16 Appl1cant shall restrIct the use of 4 of 5 cabanas to owners of umts wlthm La RIsa II, and one cabana to persons recelvmg authonty from the ASsoclatlOn of La RIsa II by reservatlOn, and shall restnct the use of all cabanas from loud muslC, partles or other assemblages of persons, all consistent With the apphcatlOn Troy James Perdue, Esq Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel, & Bums. LLP 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, FL 33756 phone 727-461-1818 fax 727-462-0365 10/11/2004 tJl. Radcliffe Development Appro' -1 CondItIons Page 1 of 1 Reynolds, Mike From Sent. To. Subject Troy J Perdue [troYP@Jpflrm com] Thursday, October 07,2004628 PM Reynolds, Mike Radcliffe Development Approval Conditions Mike, here are the two additional conditions that we discussed thIS afternoon KeIth Zayac will be provldmg the Revised SIte Plan Drawmg to you wlthm the next week Thank you for mcludmg these condltlOns If you have any questlOns or comments regardmg the addItIons, please let me know as soon as possIble Thanks Condition # 14 Apphcant shall mstall a SIX foot brIck wall at the Southern boundary of the Property consIStent WIth the revised SIte Plan, so as to restnct pedestnan traffiC onto the adjacent southern property 15 Appltcant shall restrIct the use of the docks from loud musIC, partIes or other assemblages of persons, all ';0 ... conSIstent WIth the application ~.... wt/"1iif ~i/C-. fl>/ 16 Apphcant shall restrict the use of 4 of 5 cabanas to owners of units wIthm La Rtsa II, and one cabana to persons recelvmg authOrity from the AssocIation of La Risa II by reservation, and shall restrIct the use of all cabanas from loud mUSIC, parties or other assemblages of persons, all consIstent WIth the apphcatlon Troy James Perdue, Esq. Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel. & Bums. LLP 911 Chestnut Street ClealWater, FL 33756 plwne 727-461-1818 fax 727-462-0365 10/8/2004 Radchffe Development Approv~1 CondItIons Page 1 of 2 - " r' " Reynolds, Mike From. Reynolds, Mike Sent. Fnday, October 08, 2004 3 25 PM To: 'Troy J Perdue' Cc: Gerlock, Chip Subject. RE Radcliffe Development Approval ConditIOns Troy, Anached to this e-mail IS the set of approval conditions sent to the CDS for the October 19,2004 CDS meetmg We did not lOci ude Items 15 and 16 as you proposed as th ey do nol fit with In the purpose of cond Itlons of approval Please contact me with any questions that you might have Thank you Mike Mike Reynolds. AICP, Senior Planner City of Clearwater - 727-562.4836 mike reynolds@myclearwatercom -----Ongl nal Message----- From: Troy J Perdue [mallto.troYP@Jpfirm com} sent: Thursday, October 07, 20046.28 PM To: Reynolds, Mike Subject: Radcliffe Development Approval Conditions Mike, here are the two additional conditions that we dIScussed tills afternoon KeIth Zayac will be providmg the RevISed SIte Plan Drawmg to you wlthm the next week Thank you for mc1udmg these condIhons If you have any questions or comments regardIng the additIons, please let me know as soon as possible Thanks ConditIOn # 14 Applicant shall mstall a SIX foot brick wall at the Southern boundary of the Property consIStent With the reVISed SIte Plan, so as to restnct pedestrian traffiC onto the adjacent southern property 15 Apphcant shall restrIct the use of the docks from loud musIC, parties or other assemblages of persons, aU consistent With the applicahon 16 Apphcant shall restrict the use of 4 of 5 cabanas to owners of umts wlthm La Rtsa II, and one cabana to persons receivmg authonty from the ASSOCIation of La Risa II by reservatIOn, and shall restnct the use of all cabanas from loud mUSIC, parties or other assemblages of persons, all conSistent WIth the applIcatIOn 10/8/2004 RadclIffe Development Appro,,-l Condltlons Page 2 of 2 ~ , .. Troy James Perdue, Esq Johnson. Pope. Bokor. Ruppel, & Burns. LLP 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, FL 33756 phone 727-461-1818 fax 727-462-0365 10/812004 JOHNSON, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, LLP ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS A I LAW E D ARMSTRONG III BRUCE H BOKOR JOHN R BONNER SR' GUY M BURNS JONA J HAN S COLfMA" S I ACY COSTNER MICHAEL 1" CRONIN ELIZABETH J DANIELS BECKY FERRELL-A/'<. TON COLLeeN M 11... YNN RINAT IIADAS MARION HALE scarf c ILGFNFRJT7 FRANK R JAKES TIMOTHY A JOHNSON, JR SHARON E KRICK ROGER A LARSON JOHN R LAWSON JR' LEANNL U: IIZL MICHAEL G LITTLE MICHAEL C MARKHAM ZACHARY D MESSA A R CHARLI[;; NEAL TROY J PEHDue f WALLACE pope 1R ROBERT V POrrER JR AUDREY B RAUCHW A Y DARR YL R RICIIARDS PETeR A RIVELL~"I DENNIS G RUPPfL' CHARLES A SAMARKOS PHILIP M SHASTEEN JOAN M Vl:.CCHIOLl STEVEN H WEINHERGER JOSEPH J WFISSMAN STEVEN A WJII IAMSON 'OF COUNSEL PLEASe RePLY TO CU.ARWATER F1LF NO 108455 October 14, 2004 VIA HAND DELIVERY Mr MIke Reynolds Plannmg Department MUnIcIpal ServIces BUIldIng, 2nd Floor 100 S Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Flonda 33756 Re RadclIffe Development RECENIED Ocr 15 200~ PLANNING OEPARTME~T C\TY OF CLEARWATEf. Dear Mr Reynolds Enclosed are the SIgnature pages and sIgned survey for RadclIffe Development If you have any questIOns, please feel free to contact me ~ Smcerely, \ ~'=i 'Y~lRM i) Troy J Perdue #329975 vl - RadchffeLtr Reynolds CLLARW ^ I loR OfHcr 911 CHFSTNUT ST POST OFFICE BOX 1368 CII::ARWATER FLORiDA 13757-1368 ThLEPHONh (727) 461 ISIS fELIoCOP11oR (727) 462 0365 TAMPA OFne): 100 N TAMPA ST SVlfb 1800 POST orFIC.J. BOX 1100 TAMPA J.LORIDA ,3601 1100 TELEPHONE (81 J) 225 2500 rrll COPII R (&13) 223 7118 10~\4-04 08 36am FrQm~JO~NSON,P~~~ PA 7274418617 T-509 P 02/03 F-808 CDB Meeting Date. Case Number Agenda Item' AppiJ cant , Address. October 19. 200! FLD2 D04.-03 0 1 ~ ~ Radcliffe Develt)pment Companv. LLC 669 Bay ESDlalMde ALTERNATE APPROVAL CONDITIONS The followmg are potential condl110nS that may be Inlposed should the apphcatlon be approved' u' ConditIOns of Approval I That the final design and color of the bUlldmg b.: conSistent WIth the conceptual elevatJons submItted to, or as modified by, the CDR 2 That boats moored at the eX.lSnng ,U1d any future dod(s be for the exclUSIve use by the reSIdents and/or guests of the condanurnums, 3 L That aU slgnage meet Code and be architecturally integrated mto the design of the SIte and bwlding; 4. That there be no Jet ski or other like watercraft rental busmesses at dus locauon, 5 That the SWFWMD perffilt or lener of excepo.on be proVided to Planmng staff prior to any bwldmg permit Issuance, 6. That a revised landscape plan be ~iublIlltted to the sausfacnon of Planmng staff, pnor to any bUIldmg peront Issuance, 7. That a reVIsed tree survey be subrrut1ed to the satls-factlon of Planning stdff, prior to any b011dmg penrut Issuance, 8 That the fire servlce pIpeline IOstallanon be i1ddressed to the satIsfaction of Engmeenng staff, pnor to buildmg penmt issuance. 9 That Open Space, Recreation Land and Recreanoll Faclhty Impact fees be sahsfied pnor to the Issuance of buildmg pt,muts or final plat, whichever occurs first~ 10. That all Fire Department requirements be addressed ptlor to bUIlding permit issuance. 11. That aU proposed utiUnes (from the nghts-of-w~,y to the proposed bUlldmgs) be placed underground and Installahon of condwt(s) along the entire length of the Site's street frontages be completed pnor to the Issnance of the first ceruflcate of occupancy, 12 That Traffic Impact Fees be detemnned and paid pnor to Cert1ficate of Occupancy Issuance, 13;That the condommlUID plat be recorded With Pmellas County pnor to the first "~en.ificate of Occupancy; and at the applicant mstaU a slx.-foot bnck wall along the south property line, conSIstent With the reVised site plan, sO .IS to redu'ect pedestnan traffic onto the adjacent ~~11fr/~ S \PIIIMIng DepartnunN: D S\F/.LXIPtnthng CUSIf\Up fOr rht' nut CDlNJu' &planwfr 6(;9 La R~fa IJ m 1121 G4 CDl1\Bay ElplalUliir 669 [)rqfr Approval C:(Indlltm$ Ow~' J 9 2004 ri(l~ ' 10-14-04 08 36am From-JOHNSOH,~ PA T-509 P 03/03 F-808 7Z74418617 o W 30. DOCKS: Dock usage IS restricted to: (0) occupants and guests of docked ~ or docklng vessels, (b) unit owners, CKcupantS and gueSLS while fishing or sunbathing; (c) n=;n other lawful usage by unit owners 1)( occupants subject to me rules and regulanonll\ ~ established by the Association No ponies or siaular assemblages shall be permitted on It) ~e~ W 31 CABANAS: Unit Owners are responsible to lock and secure the limiteJa'C common use cabana asslgned to their DoiL Eacb cabana must be locked when not in-use Access to the common use cabana €the "Common Cabana") will be by reservation With the ASSOCIation. Occupants m good standing With me Associatlon may reserve the Common Cabana by contBcting the Auocianon In advance At the tlfIle of the occupant's reservation, the occupant mUSt conUtct the Association, SIgn for the key and agree to abIde by the rilles and resmcb.ODS set out by the A.Cisociation for the use of the Common Cabana. F81lure to secure tbe Common Cabana after use may result ID the suspensu)n of pnvl1egr;:!ii pursuant w Paragraph 34. below [CQmmOD Area Restrictions] 32. ASSEMBLAGES' No parties or assemblages of persons are pettnttted on the Property m contravenbon of any law, stawte or ordmance, 33. NOISES: Use of radios (excludmg uqe of manne radio), tape players, co.m.pact dlsc players, or other sinnlal music devICes. is strictly probibited m the Common Areas, include, but not linuted to, the docks. pool. hot tub(s). and cabanas between the hours of 9 p m and 9 8.m. At an other times, such devices shaD be used lQ such a manner as to not dtsturb fellow occupants, owners and neighbors. 34 VIOLATIONS OF COMMON AREA USAGE RESTRICTIONS: Failure to comply with d1e restrictions on tlb! use of common ;Ueas, including. but not limited to, the cabanas and the docks, shall reult lD the suspensIon of pnVlleges for the use of the \ same. #325877 v 1 ~ Dock ReSUlCIlOns r(i~ - RQd~,~ ])&fUopmuj-- ~ - f@ Lr.:l o--j '- ~ ..:::"l I- ~o:: :!~ ~~ ~t:t: UJw) 0-1 (!)O ::2:1J.. -0 ~~ 5-" a.() l \2...:~j~ ~...,---\~ r~~e<1>~, LLL . . / . ': ~ _=-""_~~ --'"~~-=~=~~_~~___-=-______=----=~_ _--=-== ~ ~~-=--~-co:::-=--==-=-__ --.._____._ _~_=_---_-_::::o; Rildchffe Development Approv ondItlOns Page 1 of 2 ,(VI/)/...1 U d' rI'I hv 4#.f'" Reynolds, Mike From Sent: To Cc: Subject Troy J Perdue [troYP@JPflrm com] Saturday, October 09,2004944 AM Reynolds, Mike Gerlock, Chip RE Radcliffe Development Approval Conditions That's fme Thanks for the update -----Ongmal Message----- From: Mike Reynolds@myClearwater,com [mallto Mike Reynolds@myClearwater.com] sent: Friday, October 08,20043'25 PM To: Troy J. Perdue Cc: Chip Gerlock@myClearwater,com Subject: RE Radcliffe Development Approval Conditions Troy, Attached to thiS e-mail IS the set of approval conditions sent to the CDS for the October 19, 2004 CDS meeting We did not Include Items 15 and 16 as you proposed as they do not fit wlthm the pu rpose of conditions of approval Please contact me with any questions that you might have Thank you Mike Mike Reynolds, AIC?, Senior Planner City of Clearwater - 727-562-4836 mike revnolds@mvclearwatercom -----Ongmal Message----- From: Troy J Perdue [mallto troYP@JPfirm com] sent: Thursday, October 07,20046'28 PM To: Reynolds, Mike , Subject: Radcliffe Development Approval Conditions MIke, here are the two addItIonal condItIons that we dIscussed thIS afternoon KeIth Zayac WIll be provIdmg the ReVISed SIte Plan Drawmg to you wIthm the next week Thank you for rncludmg these condItIons If you have any questIons or comments regardmg the addItIons, please let me know as soon as possIble Thanks CondItIon # 14 Apphcant shall mstall a SIX foot bnck wall at the Southern bOlmdary of the Property consistent WIth the revISed SIte Plan, so as to restrIct pedestrIan traffIc onto the adjacent southern property 10/11/2004 RadclIffe Development Approv ondItlOns Page 2 of 2 15 ApplIcant shall restnct the use of the docks from loud musIC, parties or other assemblages of persons, all consIStent wIth the application 16 ApplIcant shall restnct the use of 4 of 5 cabanas to owners of umts wIthm La RlSa II, and one cabana to persons recelvmg authonty from the ASSOCiatIOn of La Rlsa n by reservation, and shall restnct the use of all cabanas from loud mUSIC, partles or other assemblages of persons, all conslstent Wlth the applIcatIOn Troy James Perdue, Esq Johnson, Pope, Bokor. Ruppel, & Bums, LLP 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, FL 33756 phone 727-461-1818 {ax 727-462-0365 10/11/2004 / ,r CDB Meetmg Date Case Number Agenda Item ApplIcant Address DRAfT October 19. 2004 FLD2004-03018 E2 RadclIffe Development Company, LLC 669 Bay Esplanade ALTERNATE APPROVAL CONDITIONS The followmg are potentxal condltlons that may be Imposed should th pphcatIOn be approved CondItIOns of Approval 1 That the fmal design and color of the bUlldmg be conSIstent With the conceptual elevatIOns subrmtted to, or as modtfIed by, the CDB, 2 That boats moored at the eXIstmg and any future docks be for the exclusIve use by the reSIdents and/or guests of the condommlUms; 3 That all slgnage meet Code and be archltecturally-mtegrated mto the design of the sIte and bUIlding, 4. That there be no Jet skI or other lIke watercraft rental businesses at thIS location, 5. That the SWFWMD permIt or letter of exception be proVIded to Planmng staff pnor to any buIldtng permIt Issuance, 6. That a revIsed landscape plan be submItted to the satisfaction of Planning staff, pnor to any buIldtng penrut Issuance, 7. That a revised tree survey be subrmtted to the satisfaction of Planmng staff, pnor to any bUIldmg penrut Issuance, 8 That the fire service pipelIne installatIOn be addressed to the satisfactIOn of EngIneenng staff, pnor to bUIldmg penmt Issuance; 9 That Open Space, RecreatIOn Land and RecreatIOn FaCIlity Impact fees be satisfied pnor to the Issuance of buIldtng pemuts or final plat, whIchever occurs first, 10 That all Fife Department reqUIrements be addressed pnor to bUIldmg penrut Issuance; 11 That all proposed utilities (from the nghts-of-way to the proposed bUIldmgs) be placed underground and mstallatIOn of condUIt(s) along the entlfe length of the SIte's street frontages be completed pnor to the Issuan~e of the first certIficate of occupancy; 12 That TraffIC Impact Fees be detenmned and patd pnor to CertIficate of Occupancy Issuance, and 13 That the condommlUm plat be recorded WIth Pmellas County pnor to the first CertIficate of Occupancy S V'lannmg Departrrumf\C D IN'LEXlPendmg casei\Up for the next CDlNJay Esplanade 669 La Rlsa 1I (T) 9 21 04 CDB\Bay Esplanade 669 Draft Approval Comhlons, October 19,2004 doc TO: FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARW A TER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE., 2nd Floor CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 /{e... J-{ br~dJC: 7 f~- 'l?/rJ FAX: Phone: - FROM: 1"1,- t:-e- 1(,,-;)<. ~ / dr Phone: J 62 - 'r.? J Is, ID - If - 6 Y SUBJECT: ft../) ~oy -03 oj P DATE: MESSAGE: ~ ::/ti ~H ~ ~ I) . V ~ s: ~ s-ld./ It. 'i. -~6J ~ 1, / L A.c r f::.t;o J'.. h d V.e- d;f r ~.1Z.-.:II' ~ ~" C-r;;o ",.do r, 0..( V, NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) p CD B Meetmg Date Case Number Agenda Item Applicant Address October 19, 2004 FLD2004-030 18 E2 RadclIffe Development Company, LLC 669 Bay Esplanade ORIGINAL CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORM A TION: REQUEST: EXISTING ZONING/ LAND USE: PROPERTY SIZE: ~ , , , ,PROPERTY USE: , ADJACENT ZONING/ LAND USES: FlexIble Development approval to penmt attached dwelhngs wIth (1) a reduchon of the mImmum lot area from 10,000 square feet to 6,479 square feet, (2) a reductIon of mInImUm lot Width from 100 feet to 60 feet, (3) a reductIOn of the front setback from 15 feet to 5 69 feet (to pavement), (4) a reductIOn of the SIde (south) setback from 10 feet to four feet to extenor stans; (5) a reductIOn ofthe SIde (north) setback from 10 feet to 672 feet (to bmldmg), (6) a reductton of the rear setback from 20 feet to 10 feet (to wooden deck), and (7) a bUIldmg heIght mcrease from 35 feet to 51 83 feet from FEMA to mldpomt of the roof under the provIsIons of SectIOn 2- 803 B Tounst (T) DIstnct, Resort FacIlItIes HIgh (RFH) Category o 148 acres, 6,479 square feet Current Use Apartments (8 umts) Proposed Use MultI-famIly reSidentIal (4 umts) North Tounst DIstnct (T), Overmght accommodatIOns West Tounst DIstnct (T), Overmght accommodatIOns and attached dwellmgs East Clearwater Harbor and Tounst DIstnct (T), Clearwater Harbor South. Tounst DIstnct (T), Attached dwellings CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY: Scemc north-south beach comdor, ovcrnIght lodgmg, multI-famIly reSIdentIal, and commerc13l. Slaff Report - Commumty Development Board - October 19, 2004 - Case FLD2004-030 18 - Page I ORIGINAL UPDA TE: At the July 20, 2004 Commumty Development Board (CDB) meetmg, a motIon to approve this case failed by a vote of 2-3 and the case was automatically contmued to August This case was contmued from the August 17, 2004 meetmg because of new plans submitted by the applicant The staff report has been updated accordmgly The revISIOns mclude a reductIOn m the front setback was changed from SIX feet (to pavement) to 5 69 feet (to pavement), a reductIOn In the side (south) setback was changed from zero feet (to wooden walkway) to four feet (to ex tenor st3lrs), a reductIOn m the side (north) setback was changed from eIght feet (to bUlldmg) to 672 feet (to bUlldmg) (the section of the bUlldmg housmg the dumpster now opens to the outside) and the ImpervIOus surface ratIOn was reduced from 0 75 to 0 70 ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: Tills 0 148-acre sIte IS located on the eabt sIde of Bay Esplanade, approXImately 300 feet south of Somerset Street OvernIght accommodatIOns and attached dwellIngs dommate the ImmedIate vIcImty to the west, south, and north By Code, the allowable densIty on thiS site IS five hotel umts or four dwellIng umts The site contams an eXlstmg, smgle-story, eIght-umt apartment bUlldmg, wIth back out parkmg on Bay Esplanade There IS an eXlstmg deck on the east sIde ofthe SIte and an eXlstmg walkway from the front of the Site to the rear along the south property Ime The eXIstmg bmldmg and Its parkmg area fit tIghtly onto the site There IS lImIted landscapmg There IS one eXlstmg dock, located at the east sIde of the sIte, IS proposed to remam by thIS redevelopment request. The site IS located wlthm the specml area redevelopment plan, Beach by De~lgn, as part of the "Old Flonda" DistrIct ThIs area has been designated for mulh-fmmly townhomes and condommIUms of low to mldnse The Immedmte vIclmty IS almost entIrcly composed of attached dwellings and small motels Bmldmg styles generally resemble architecture from the 1950's and appear to have been progressIvely expanded Bay Esplanade, m thrs general VICIl1Ity, IS a local street wIth no sIdewalks where many SItes rely on the public nght-of-way to accommodate perpendIcular, back-out parkmg Generally, the streetscape IS III need of redevelopment to Improve parkmg, pedestnan access, and Its aesthetic appearance Beach by Deslgn recognIzes SIte constramts of parcels m the neIghborhood and dIfficultIes of redevelopment Proposal: The proposal IS to completely raze the eXIstmg apartments and construct four attached dwellmgs ("La RIsa II") The applIcatIOn IS seekmg approval of the use, lot Size and Width reductIOns, setback reductIOns, plus an mcrease III heIght The proposal shows SIX on-Site parkmg spaces at ground level The bUIldIng IS proposed to be four stones above parkIng and reach to 51 83 feet from a FEMA bmldmg hne to roof mIdpomt ThIS SIte IS located wlthm a flood zone (Zone AE) with an elevatIon of 11 feet The bUIldIng elevatIOns show four stones wIth a rooftop terrace over parkmg There IS an elevator ovemm tower extendmg over the roof terrace The desIgn of the butldmg mcludes arched stylmg with some of the doorways and wmdows Large wmdows are show on the east elevatIOn, wlth VIews of Clearwater Harbor The plans show the bUIldmgs to have a beige color stucco fimsh with a red-brown color roof Wmdows are proposed to have alumInum frammg wIth a precast stone look tnm The roof IS shown to have a clay tile mISSIOn shape Wrought Iron rallmgs WIll be attached to walkways and platforms outslde the bmldmg on five levels The north and webt Staff Report - Comrnumty Development BOdrd - October 19, 2004 - Case FLD2004-030 18 - P Jge 2 ORIGINAL , elevatlOos show a decoratIve archItectural medalhon on the north and west sIdes of the elevator tower Extenor staIrs are shown on the north elevation, from the ground level to the roof Vehicular and pedestnan safety would bc Improved, as there wlll no longer be any back out parkmg onto Bay Esplanade Five cabanas and a rest room are shown on the site plan at the rear of the sIte The deck and dock amemty IS proposed to be shared with resIdents of a resldentml development across the street to the west, (La Rlsa n Trash collectIon IS proposed to be made from a solId waste dumpster located InsIde the bmldmg at the front (west SIde) of the site The dumpstens directly accessIble from a door openIng to the sIte entrance from Bay Esplanade WhIle there IS a landscape plan, the proposed setbacks reduce the opportumty for green space A sIx-foot hIgh opaque fence IS proposed along the south Side of the property PrehrnlOary stormwater desIgn has been addressed The desIgn IS essentially complete Beach by DesIgn does not speclfically suggest the development as proposed by thIS apphcatIOn Beach by DesIgn reads 10 part," the scale and mtensIty of the area, WIth relatIVely few exceptIons, IS substantially less than comparable areas to the south" The document contemplates "lImited new constructIOn where renovatlOn IS not practIcal" What IS proposed IS a substantIal mcrease m scale to what eXIsts wIthm the Old Flonda DIstnct The development IS not Visually mterestmg and the massIng and scale do not comply with the mtended character of the "Old Flonda DIstnct" and Beach by DeSIgn The apphcatIOn proposes to maXlllllze the allowable densIty and IS seekmg seven vanatlOns from the Code to make this project work (reductIons In lot SIze, WIdth, setbacks, and an mcrease m bUIldmg height) The proposed use IS acceptable, but the overall scale IS not compatIble wIth the eXIstmg surroundmg land uses The proposed reductIOn In lot area Will result In a bUIldmg, WhICh IS out of scale with eXlstmg bUIldmgs m the Immediate VICInIty of the parcel proposed for development The proposed mcreased ill heIght does not result 10 an Improved SIte plan or Improved deSign and appearance The proposed reductIOns In Side setbacks do not result m an Improved site plan, more efficIent parkmg or Improved deSIgn and appearance Development of the land, as proposed, will not be m harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, denSIty and character of adjacent propertIes DesIgn of the proposed development does not mInImIZe VIsual adverse Impacts on adjacent propertIes CODE ENFORCEMENT ANALYSTS: There are no outstandmg enforcement Issues assocIated wIth thIS SIte '\ Staff Report - Commumty Development Board - October 19, 2004 - Case FLD2004-030 18 - Page 3 ORIGI~J/~L ST ANDARDS AND CRITERIA: (SectIOn 2-801.1 and 2-802 ): STANDARD PROPOSED CONSISTENT NCONSISTENT MAXIMUM Four dwelling UTItts X DENSITY (maximum of four dwelling units permitted) IMPERVIOUS 07 X SURFACE RATIO (ISR) (maximum ISR is .95) LOT AREA (10,000 o 148 acres, 6,479 square feet X* square feet is minimum requirement) LOT WIDTH (100 60 feet at nearest pomt X* feet minimum required) FRONT SETBACK 569 feet at closest pomt (to X* (35 feet minimum pavement) required) REAR SETBACK (20 10 feet (to deck) X* feet . . mInimum reQ uiremen t) SIDE SETBACK (10 North 672 feet X* feet . . South four feet to extenor staIrS mInimum req uirement) HEIGHT (35 - 100 51 83 feet X* feet allowable FLD ranee) PARKING SPACES SlX spaces, 1 5 spaces per umt X (1.5 per unit required) * See analysts above for dlSCUSSlOll Stdff Report - Commumty Development Board - OGlober 19, 2004 - Ca~e FLD2004-030 18 - Page 4 OR\G\NAL FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA (Section 2-803.B) applicable to lot area and width, building h . ht d b k elJ:?;1 an set ac s: Consntent 1 nconslsten t 1 The reductIon In lot area will not result In a bUlldlllg, which IS out of scale WIth eXIstmg bUlldlllgs III the ImmedIate vIcImty of the parcel [X] proposed for development 2 The use of the parcel proposed for development wIll not mvolve dIrect [X] access to an artenal street 3 The mcreased height results III an Improved site plan or Improved [ ] [X] desIgn and appearance 4 The mcreased heIght IS necessary to allow the Improvement of off~ [X] [ ] street parkmg on the ground floor of the resIdentIal bUlldmg 5 The reductIOn m sIde setback does not prevent access to the rear of [ ] [X] any bUlldmg by emergency vehIcles 6 The reductIon III SIde setback results m an Improved sIte plan, more [ ] [X] effiCIent parklllg or Improved deSign and appearance GENERAL STANDARDS (Section 3-913): ConsIStent Inconsistent 1 Development of the land WIll be In harmony wIth the scale, bulk, [ ) [X] coverage, densIty and character of adJacent propertIes 2 Development Will not hmder or discourage development and use of [X] [ ] adjacent land and bUlldmgs or sIgnIficantly ImpaIr the value thereof 3 Development WIll not adversely affect the health or safety of persons [X] [ ] reSIdIng or workmg m the neIghborhood 4 Development IS deSIgned to minImIZe traffic congestIOn [X] [ ] 5 Development IS conSIstent WIth the commumty character of the [ ) [X] ImmedIate vlcImty , 6 DeSIgn of the proposed development mInImIZeS adverse effects, [ ] [X] mcludmg VIsual, acoustIc and olfactory and hours of operatIon Impacts on adjacent properties Staff Report - Commum ty DevelQpment Board - October 1 9, 2004 - Case FLD2004-0J 0 [S - Page 5 ORIGINAL SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development ReVIew Committee reviewed the applIcatIOn and supportIng matenals at Its meetIngs on May 6, 2004 and June 10, 2004 The Plannmg Department recommends DENIAL of the Flextble Development applIcatlOn to develop four residential attach cd dwelling umts on (1) a 6,479 square foot lot (10,000 square feet IS reqUired), WIth (2) a mInllnUm lot wIdth of60 feet (100 feet IS requIred), seekmg (3) a reduction In the front setback from 15 feet to 5 69 feet to pavement, (4) a reductIOn m the sIde (south) setback from 10 feet to four feet to extenor stmrs, (5) a reductIOn of the sIde (north) setback from 10 fcet to 672 feet (to bUIldmg), (6) a reduction of the rear setback from 20 feet to 10 feet to wooden deck, and (7) a bUIldIng heIght mcrease from 35 feet to 51 83 feet from FEMA to roofmtdpomt under the provlSlons of Section 2-803 B Bases for Demal I The proposal does not comply WIth the FleXIble Development cntena per SectIOn 2-803 B 2 The proposal 1S not m complIance WIth other standards m the Code Includmg the General ApplIcabIlity Cntena per Sechon 3-913 3 The development IS not compatIble WIth the surroundmg area and Will not enhance other redevelopment efforts III the vlcmIty of the Site locatIOn 4 The proposed development IS IllconsIstent WIth what IS proposed wIthm Beach by DeSIgn for property wIthm the Old Flonda DIstnct Prepared by Plannmg Department Staff 1Ur~~~. ~ Michael H Reynolds, AICP, Planner III A TT ACHMENTS Aenal Photograph of SIte and VIcImty LocatIOn Map Future Land Use Map Zomng Atlas Map ApplIcation S \P/an/lmg Deparlmenr\C D B\FLEX\Pendmg cases\Up far the /lext CDBIBay Esp/allade 669 La RJ ~a /J (7)\Bay Esplanade 669 Staff Report for the September 21 2004 meetmg doc Staff Report - Commumty Development Board - October 19, 2004 - Case FLD2004-030 1 8 - Page 6 CDB Meetmg Date Case Number Agenda Item ApplIcant Address: October 19, 2004 FLD2004-030 18 E2 RadclIffe Development Companv, LLC 669 Bay Esplanade ALTERNATE APPROVAL CONDITIONS The followmg are potentIal condItIOns that 'may be Imposed should the applIcatIOn be approved. CondItIOns of Approval 1 That the fmal desIgn and color of the bUIldmg be conSIstent WIth the conceptual elevatIons submltted to, or as modtfled by, the CDB, 2 That boats moored at the eXIstmg and any future docks be for the exclUSIve use by the resIdents and/or guests of the condonnmums; 3 That all sIgnage meet Code and be archltecturally-mtegrated mto the desIgn of the sIte and bmldmg; 4 That there be no Jet skI or other lIke watercraft rental busmesses at thIS locatIon; 5 That the SWFWMD perrmt or letter of exceptIOn be proVIded to Planmng staff pnor to any bmldmg perrmt Issuance; 6 That a reVIsed landscape plan be subnntted to the satIsfactIOn of Planmng staff, pnor to any bUIldmg penmt Issuance; 7. That a revised tree survey be submItted to the satIsfactIOn of Planmng staff, pnor to any bUIldtng permIt Issuance, 8 That the fIre serVIce plpelme mstallatlOn be addressed to the satIsfactIon of Engmeenng staff, pnor to bUIldmg permIt Issuance; 9. That Open Space, RecreatIon Land and RecreatIOn FacIlIty Impact fees be satIsfied pnor to the Issuance of bUIldmg penmts or fmal plat, whIchever occurs first, 10 That all FIfe Department reqUIrements be addressed poor to bUIldtng permIt Issuance; 11 That all proposed utlhtIes (from the nghts-of-way to the proposed bUIldtngs) be placed underground and mstallatlOn of condUIt(s) along the entlre length of the SIte's street frontages be completed poor to the Issuance of the first certIfIcate of occupancy, 12 That TraffIC Impact Fees be determmed and pald poor to CertIficate of Occupancy Issuance, 13 That the condormmum plat be recorded WIth Pmellas County poor to the first CertIfIcate of Occupancy, and 14 That the applIcant mstall a SIx-foot bnck wall along the south property Ime, consIstent wIth the revIsed SIte plan, so as to redtrect pedestnan traffic onto the adjacent southern property. S \Plannmg Deparlmenf\C D IN'LEXlPendmg ca~e~\Up for the next CD!NJay Esplanade 669 La R,sa 1/ (TJ 921 04 CDIJ\Bay Esplanade 669 Draft Approval Condllon~, October 19,2004 doc SEND I HG F-'EPDRT Oct. 18 2004 01 13PM YOUR LOGO YOUR FRX NO. Clt~OfClearwater-Plan Dept 727 562 4865 NO OTHER FRCSIMILE 01 97939855 STRRT TIME USRGE TIME MODE PRGES RESULT Oct. 18 01 09PM 04'45 SND 08 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' 1*04. THEN SELECT OFF BY US lNG' +' OR '-'. FOR FAX RDURNTRGE RSSIST~, PL..EASE: CALL l-000-tlELP-FAX (435-7329). ,..-' PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF CLEARWATER FLD2004-03018 669 BAY ESPLANADE Date Received: 03/24/2004 LA RlSA II ZONING DISTRICT: T LAND USE: RFH ATLAS PAGE: 258A PLANNER OF RECORD: MHR C L W CoverSh eet ~ '. * --~ \ '"" clearwater CASE # DATE RECEIVED RECEIVED BY (staff Inlllals) _ ATLAS PAGE # ZONING DISIRICT LAND USE CLASSIFICATION SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES NORTH SOUTH WEST EAsr Plarorolrog Departmerol 100 South Myrtle Averoue Clearwater Florida 33756 Telephoroe 727-562-4567 Fax 727 562-4865 ., .o;,,""~~ -:::: :;:-~~ _-:~~ ...,- /" \...,......I~ .......-.............-........ .....--'- I 'i\ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICJ\,T10N \'1 ~ SUBMIT ft'tOP1ES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION Including 1) "ollaleo 2) sta pleo and 3) foloed sets of ~Ite plans )i.. SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE:) \1-07- \'S'- * NOTE ,-..a-fOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION (Revlseoll/05/02) ~ PLEASE rYPE OR. PRINT- A APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION (Code Section 4-202 A) APPLICANT NAME _Radcliffe Developmer\t, Company, LLC MAILING ADDRESS 2424 Curlew Rd Clearwater FL 33683 PHONE NUMBER 727785-4070 FAX NUMBER _721-7840096 PROPER 1 Y OWNER(S) _Virginia Fraroks__ (Must Include ALL owners) AGENT NAME _ Keith Zayac PERLA Robert Flynt MAILING ADDRESS __101 Philippe Par1<.way Ste 205 Salety Harbor FL 34€95 PHONE NUMBER _727-793-9888 FAX NUMB~R __727-793-9855__ CELL NUMBER E-MAIL ADDRESS _kollhzayac@aol com B PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMA lION (Code SectIOn 4-202 A) STREET ADDRESS -------== -- ~r~\~~~\ \ \L--, I ,- \ ,>I..l~ \\ )~~~~--- \\ 0'\ \ n IL_LlZ~4 I. ') \U u \ 1\" _--I --- PROPOSED USErS) AND SIZE{S) _ 4 condo m I n I U m units _ . I _ 'J r 1 ~ (number of dwellmg units holol rooms or square 100lagLe of nonre~(3~ntlal US;) ," nl v -~ -~-- DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST{S) _see exhibit A 101 oescnptlOn of requests (Include all requesled coo e devlallons, e 9 recJuctlOn rn req\Hfecl numbf'1 of p<J rk1f1g sp ~("e" SPPl..1 NC uS0 ell- 1 _669 Bay Esplanade LEGAL DESCRIPTION _See attached survey rARCEL NUMBER _0::'-29-15-54 756-077 -0080 PARCEL SIZE ~o 15 acres (acres square feet) Page 1 of 6 - FlexlOle Develop'Tlent ApnhcallDr\ - C'ly 01 Clearwale' J 1 l I r '~ "- DOES THIS APPLI CATION INVOLVE THE 1 RANSFi:oR OF DEVELOPMENT RIGH1 S (TOR) A PREVI DUSL ~ APPROVED PLANNE::D UN 11 J DEVELOPMENT, OR A PReVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO _x_ (If ye5 Jtlacl' a coPy cf Ill" apollcable dow~"") _ - c PROOF OF OWNERSHIP (Code SectIOn 4-202 A 5) I fH' PROPER" I i SUBMIT A COpy OF THE TITLE INSURA.NCE POLICY DE ED OR AFF IDA VIT An f 511 NG TO 1 hE OWN ERSHI P Of D ~ WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS (Code Section 3-913 A) Prolllde complete responses to the ~IX (6) GENERAL "PPLlCA6IL1TY CRITERIA - Explalf' how each cnlefl'" IS achiellod, In delall Tl1e proposed dellelOpmenl of the land will De In ha rmony wllh the scale bulk co ,er dge denSity and character of aUJa cpm propl'rtles In WhlCll ,t IS located "See e~hlbll 8 for gerleral applicability cfltena responses 10 qUf'shons 1 =6 , rhe proposed dellelopment will not hinder or dl"COlJrage the appropriate dellelopll1em drl(J ~~e 01 adldc.e111 lano alld OUlldmg~ 0' S'811111l.-dlllly Iffipdlf [he lIalue thereof 3 The proposed development will not adversely affec' lh(' heallh or safel'l or persons res'GlIlg 01 worKing '11 Ir,p ne'gllOol hood olll1e propo~e'l use 4 fhe proposed developmenlls deSigned 10 mln mlze traffic lOrlgeSllon 5 The proposed dellelopmenllS consistent With the commu'1lly Character of lhe Illllnedlate vlClnlly of the parcel 1)lopOSeo for r1ellelopmenl \ ---------- I ----------- ~- I --==-J I I 6 The deSign of lhe proposed dellelopmenl ill'n1Il1IZeS ddver~e effects, including VISUJ I ac,OlJSlIC a no OIl",uol)' and l1{)urs of onp, dtHlIl In11'act" on adJacenl properties 1 Addfe% thf' applicable ftexlblllly criteria for lI1e specIfic land Lise as hted In each LOlling ~)I5lrIc1 to y, nlcl1 the waive, IS req uf'~ted (use ~epd' die sheets as necessary) - Explam how mlena IS acl\lelled In deta,l see exhlbrl C for a ppllCilble fleXibility crltena '€sponses Page 2 ot 6 - FleXible Oelleloprnent ApphcdllOfl - City or Clea,watef ~ E SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS (Code SectIon 4-202 A) 15fJ ~ ~ .is.. SIGNED AND SEALED SURVE:Y (Includmg legal desCflpllon of property) - One anginal and 12 coples TREE SURVEY (mcludlng eXisting trees on site and Within 25' of the adlacen! $Ite by species, ~lle (DBH 4- Of grf'aler) and 10(.atIOfl IncJudll1g dnp Ill1es and Indlcatlng trees to be removed). LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY, tJ)) t:p.)~ .-nk1rp( ,-- PARKING DEMAND STUDY In conjunctIOn with a request 10 make deViatIOns to Il1e parkmg standards (IC Re(tuc,- ""moel of spau;~) Pr")1 to the submittal of Ihls apphcatlon, the methodology of such study shall be appfO~ed by Ihe Commumly Develormenl Coordlnalor dnd ~rodll !)Eo In accordance With accepled lraffic englnee~nng ~n.sPl~s The findmgs of the study Will be used ,ro delermlnlng whether or not devlatlon~ 10 the parkmg stalldards are approved, t-~~ lOt.. GRADING PLAN as applicable o PRELIMINARY PLAT, as reqUired (Note BUilding permlls will not be Issued unlll eVldellce of recordlllg a fmal plat IS provldecl) Q COpy OF RECORDED PLAT as appllc~ble, F SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS (Code Section 4-202 A) ~ SITE: PLAN With lhe follOWing rnformatlon (not to ",>:ceed 24" x 36') All dimenSions, North arrow Engmeerlllg bar scale (mLnlmum scale one Inch equals 50 feet) and date prepdred, Location map, Index sheet relerencrng ,ndiVidual sheets IIlcludea In package. Footpnnt and size of all EXISTING bUllclLngs and structures Footprml and size of all PROPOSED bUildings and structures, All req ulred setbacks All eXlsllllg and proposed pOllltS 01 access All reqUired slghttnallgles IdentificatIOn of emllronmenlally umque aredS such as watercourses weUands IrBB mas~es ana ~peClmen trees mdudmg clescrlptlon and location of understory ground cover vegetatlQn dnel Wildlife habl'als, elc, Locahon of a II publiC and private easemellts Locahon of all street nghls-of.way wlthm and adlacenlto Ihe sIte Location of e)(lslmg pubhc and prlvale utilities, Includmg fife hydrants storm arid ~arlll~'y sewer Ilne~ ma'lnot~s dno II ~ stations gas and water Imes All parkmg spaces dnveways, loading area;. alld vehlGlJlar use dreas, Depiction by shad Ing or crosshatching of a II reqUired parkmg IOllnlerlol landscaped a redS Location of all solid wasle cOlltalllers recyclmg or Irash 11andling areas and outslde rneche meal eqUlpmenl end allleq ulred screer ling {per Seellon 3-201 (DlIl) and Index #701) Locallon of all landscape matenal Locallon of all onSlte and offslle storm-water mdnagement facilities, Location 01 all outdoor Ilghlmg rrxtures alld LocatIOn of all eXlsllng and proposed sldewa Iks ~ 511 E DATA TABLE for eXlstmg reqUired and proposed developmenl In wnlle IlItabular lorm Land area m square feel and acres Number of EXISTING dwelling units Number of PROPOSED dwelllllg units Gross floor area cleva led to each use Parkmg spaces total number presented mtabular form With the Ilumber 01 requlled spaces, Total paved area, Including all paved parklllg spaces and driveways, expressed In sOllare feet am! pO'lcerotage 0' Ihe p"ved \Je~lIlLJlar area Size alld speaes of all landscape malenal OffiCial records book and page Ilumbers of all eXisting utihty easement, BUltdmg and structure heights, Impermeable surface ratlo (I S R ), arrd Floor area ratio (F A R ) for all nomes dentlal uses r Q REDUCE D S 11 E PLAN to scale (3 Y, X 11) and color renclerlllg If pos<;lble FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE prOVide lhe fOlloWlllg1abdl~fOrll1allOn on s,te plan One-fool contours or spot elevallons on site I V' I~I I Off site elevations If reqwed 10 evaluate the proposed stormwalJr mallagement lor '110' parC/J1 All open space areas, Location of all earth or water retallllng walls and earth berms Lot lines and blJlldlllg Imes (dimensioned), Streels and dnves (dimenSioned) BUlldlllg and structural setbacks (dimenSioned) St ructu ra love rh a ngs Tree Inventory prepared by a certified arbo'lSl', of alllrees 8" DSH or greater rellec.llllg size Cil' IOPY (dflp IlIles) ano COrtChtlOfl 01 slIch Ir,"e~ Page J of 6 - FleXible Development Appllcatlo', - O!y of Clea,w<,le' v G STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS (City of Clearwater DesIgn Criteria Manual and 4.202 A 21) ~ STORMWATER PLAN mdudmg the fclloWH1g requirements Existing topography extending 50 leet beyond all property hnes, Proposed grading Including finished floor elevations of al1 structures All adjacent streets and muniCipal storm systems, PlOposed stormwater detenllonlretentlon area mcludmg lop 01 bank toe of slope and oullet control structure Stormwater calculallons for attenuation and water quality Signature of Florrda registered ProfeSSional Engineer on all plans and calculations ~ COpy OF PERMIT INQUIRY LEITER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMII SUeMlll AL (SWFWMD approval IS reqUired pflorto issuance of City BUilding Permll) If applicable D COpy OF STATE AND COUNTY STORMWATER SYSTEM TIE-IN PERMIT APPLICATIONS If applicable H LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS (SectIOn 4-1102 A) ~ LANDSCAPE PLAN ( Atl eXisting and proposed struclures, Names of abuUmg streets Drainage and retenhon areas Including swales Side slopes and bottom elevations, Delmeallon and dimenSions of all reqUired penmeter landscape buffers Sight VISibility tnangles Dellneahon and dimenSions of all par'Klng areas mcludlng landscapmg 1~lamls and curbing Proposed and required par'Kllrg spaces EXlstmg trees on-Site and Immediately adjacent to the Slt<,. by speCies size and locations, mcludlng drlpllne location size deSCription speCifications and quantities of all eXlstmg and proposed landsca pe malenals mclud,ng oota r1IC<1I and common names Typical planling details for trees palms shrubs and ground cover planlS mcludmg mslr Jc110ns ~oll InlxtS backfilling mlJlCfllnq d nd protective measures Intenor landscapmg areas hatched andlof snaded ar1d labeled and Inlerlor 101 ndscape coverage expressmg m bOlll squa r, 1('E'1 a 11d perCf'nlage covered Conditions of a prevIOus development approval (10 g conditions Imposed by the COITlITluruty Developmenl Board) Irngal10n notes ~ REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 ,/, X 11) (color rendenng If pOSSible) o tRRIGATION PLAN (required lor level two and three aoproval), o COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application as applicable BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITIAL REQUIREMENTS (Section 4-202 A 23) ReqUired In the event the application Includes a development where deSign Slandards are In Issue (e 9 Tounst and Downtown Q'SIn< IS) or a" part ot a ComprehenSive Intill Redevelopment PrOject or a Resldentlallnfill Protect '-A 8UILOING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all Sides of all bUildings Including 1181g11t olln~n~lons, colors ana malenab ~ ~ REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four Sides of bUilding Wllll (..CIOfS and rnatellds to scale (8 y, ;< 11 J (IliaCI< and while ano GolOl I rendermg, If pOSSible) as reqUired J SIGNAGE (DIVISIOn 19 SIGNS f Section 3.1806) wlu/ ''&~ -7o\41'rnw:Y U~- '7Gf/'CO"tT.1-:: ?n"rlrl o All EXISTING freestandmg and attachea Signs PrO",de photographs and dimenSIOns (area !1elgllt ete) mdlcate whether they Will De removed or to remain Q All PROPOSED freestanding and attached Signs PrOVide details Includlrlg local lon, Sl';!' he'ght colof~ ITldlendl~ Ano (Jrawlng D ComprehenSive Sign Program appllcabol1 as applicable (separate applicallon and fee reqUired) Q Reduced slgnage proposal (8 ,/, X 111 (color), If submlltmg Comprehens,ve Sign Program application P age of of 6 - FleXible Development AoplleiHlOn - Cltv 01 Clea""'8 Le! rl ---J K TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY (Section 4-801 C) (.".E\T"E?-.~ Include as reqUlfed if proposerl development will degrade tNl ncceplable level of seM~ for any roadway as aooptea In me ComprehensJVe f>lan ~ Tnp gener.l~on shall be based Orl the most recerlt edrtJon of lI><llrls~llJte of Transporta~on Engmeer'~ Tllp General ~',arlual Refer \0 SCC:JOn 4-80 \ C of the Communrty De\lelopmerlt Code for exceptIOns 10 Ill" f'eqUlreme n\ L SIGNATURE. ~-C~~ ~~. STATE OF FLORIDA. COUNTY OF PINELlAS I Swor" to and suoscrooed IJdOle ./lle lIlIs .-d:J Day of Iv ~ AD zon 10 me and/or by who is persona Ily KI1OWI1 ~\a S produced F L ~(( k<eA-T L., < <. as Iden~flcallOI1 F<.f 5 '3 '11 "'L- ~ l..j I q () Ko~e(l.;/ L FIYf\.,f Vlrg Inla Allen c, eOITTllTTSSIDTI1r0D2658 8 2 "&"# Expires Novemoer 30 2007 ~ Jf"01 FiAl\ ]L'~~ Ii(:. er.r....~/C',~ I, the undersigned a cKrlowledge that a II repre senla~ons made H\ lhls application ~re true and a ccurate to l,')~ \>est of my knowledgo D nd authorue City representatives to "'S~ aM photogra ph the propc r1y descnbed III thiS appllca~on IJtLtL rJ d~h ~ (: r Y rJj /,. - . J;) A . , Ji()./) c ~ ~^1 ~ bo)YJbvJ"--,,C If(- ~ , ~ lj. ik ft1"JL cwd/ "- ~ .- cUj i .' . & ~ .,(YLCLLu--<'.J,-d.- ~ '--<,J, , --I~~"Y'- ~ !) LN J -~t -.1 I - L (( {.../U (/-<...- C1./LAJUi./rLJ L ~V'~ Ofi jcLk/)'"V , ~ '~V1 'C I -.), CL 27 ~ /..,1- d-a._ Lj1~ 1/U;Xvv '-jto~ 0~cc- MARilYN KUIPERS CQMWSSION I tI:Xl5QoIn EXf"rRfS S8' 22 L'Xl5 ~ ~ r.t?fi1 t: ADV~ ..-:r..<rr ';-.r,!' ~ 0' 5 _ rer.>e Coe'...doprnenl AppliOl\IOn - e,l)' of Clearwa\er ,'" / l~ M AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT '\I\~A\\-l\A ffAW~ ...............~- --------~ (Names of an property owners) Thai (I amlwe are) the owner(s) and record ILUe hQlder(s} 01 Iho lotlowlng descnbed property (address or generallocaMn) (P(P'1 ~A.--( e7?&-^M~ - -------- ~ - ----..----.--' 2 That ttllS property constTlutes the property for whlen a requesl for a (desmbe request) lOW. ~ -.----.-----~~~-~ ~~--~ ~~~---~ - ~-~ ~ ~ - ~~ 3 Thatlhe unders,gned (hasmave) ap;>omled ar>d (doesJdo) appOint A\....tP ~e.ln-\ ZA'1w:---;y-e:- 1--p&A ~~-r- r= L-- \'I-l-r- --~ ~-~ ~- -~~~ ~---~ 4 That Ihls affid aVlI has been executed 10 Induce the City of CIeJrwaler Flond a to consLder and ad on tile alloVC d€SCflbed propel ty as (his/theIr) agent(s) to execute any pelrtJons or other dorum",nls necessary 10 allecl such peIJllOn 5 ThaI SIIe VlSlls to the property are necessary by City rePfeooenl3tlves In order 10 process 11115 applicatIOn and ll1e owner authonze~ City repl"€senlabves 10 Vlsll and phologra ph the property desmt>ed ,n thiS applIcatIOn 6 Thai (I/we) i --j the underSigned authOnty h<:reby certrf'y thaI the foregOing IS true and co~ecl / ' "- <....--f'/ 'J~"-- /,,) _ Z/~~/"'-/'/ {I:>L C-..L/L.::,c:!:::::"~- ---- Property Owner property~:er - ---- --- ---- STATE OF FLORIDA, ~ f:c~1 . ".h.IG oj ~rA"O'1 ~ J::~j ~ ~ ~AARllYN KUIPERS (o'.w.:sSlON I D0059A98 ~s so 23 2005 ':CO"<< 0 rHIlO.-'G\1 ~""~ NQWlY COUNTY OF PINELLAS elore me the un6efSlgned an officer duly comm,s.:;'OlX-d py ;J. 00 I.f personally ax-eared \ eposes and says thaI he/she fully uncl~s ~ colllents 01_ My Commission Expires --- ;J DOC "oqe 6 01 6 _ ;:-",>Jl)Ie [;oe"elopmenl ApphcallOrl - City 01 Cle:Jrwalel EXHlun A DEf,CRlP I ION OF REQUEST~ . ReductIOn of mlmmurn lot area from J 0 000 s f to 6 479 '> f o ReductlOn of minimum lot width flam 100 feet to 60 teet . Reduce front setback trom 15 feet to 6 foot Jl1tnlllllll11 . Reduce sIde c,etback flOm 10 feet to 0 mmnTIum . Reduce reM setback from 20 feet to 10 feet mll1lmUm r; EXHIBIT B GENERAL APPLICABILrTY CRITERIA RESPONSES 1 The proposed development of the land wIiI he III hW!nony wllh the !:Jwle, hulk, coverage, denslly and Ghar acter oj adjacent p! opel lie ~ 111 IVI1/( h /l l\ luut/eeL Rather than being in harmony WIth the eharactet of the C\.I~t1l1g oldel mulu-tdl11l1y projects located adjacent to the sIte, the PIO)\:'ct will set d ne\-v standard f'of the neighborhood, slmllaJ to LaRlsa I The plOposcd pi oject will hOWl-Vel n1all1ldll1 the character of Clearwater Beach with the propo'5ed Medlterranl-dn ,1lc,hltec'LUral theme and small-scale condominIUm developmcnt I he ploject doc~ not deviate from the pel mltted uses in the TouIlst Zoning DIStflCl dnd fep! l-::,cnts d clel-rCdSe III density from the eXisting 8-ul1lt apartment (,Qlnple;.. to 4 cOnd01l11l11U1l1 Ul1Its Thc character of the project IS an upscale COndOm1l11Um development With upgladccl archltectllJal fiI1lshes and teAtllJeS 2 The proposed development wtll not 11Inde! (II cll!:Jwurage [he appro/JllUte development and use of adjaGent land and bUildings 01 \lgl1ljiwl7lly IInpCIlI [he value thereof The proposed development IS consistent \\ Ith th\:, eXI'5tJng surrollnclll1g dnd proposed land uses The project will be consl~tcnt With thc le-clcvelopmCIJI of LaRtsa I to the east, and set a pOSitIve e;..ample for tht. ledevclopmcnt of th~ adjacent propertlcs to the north and south when appl op' late Thl v,due of the abutting plOpertles wtll not be complomlsed and \\It/I likely he enh.ll1eed by the development of the project 3 The proposed development WIll not advel \ely affat The health 01 safety 01 penol1.5 resldzng 01 \1-o!fang zn the nelghbul hood oj the pi opO'led me The leductlon In den~lty from 8 eXlsl1ng apclftmcnt to 4 plopo~ed COnd01ll1l1111m lImts would decIea~e the vehlculal tl affie ellong Bay E~planade "f hel e ell e no proposed uses other than rcsldentIal that wdl have d detrImental effect on thc health of persons resldlllg or workll1g 111 tht, l1ughbol hood 4 The l)ropo~ecl development IS de~/gl1ed LO n1111l1l/1Ze II aJjl( wnge\[1011 The proposed development IS de~lgned to [ccllll,l- the vehIcular LIdlfie through the reductIOn of Ul1lts from 8 apartments to 4 condominIUm.:; The requlIed pdrklng wIll be prOVided on-~lte and malllly wltl1ln an enclosed parklllg gal age 5 The pi oposed developmellt IS cOIl~l.5len{ wilh {he Gomm/llJ//y chw a( fer of (he ImmedlClte VIGll1lty of the parcel pI oposed fm developmel1l The palcels unmedlately to the north dnd sOlllh dre cUllentl)' multI-tamlly developments The paIcel to the cast comall1s the approved LaRlsc1 I mul11-1anllly prOject Therefore the project I':' wnSlstent wIth the CXj~llng tine! propo:,ed use::. current zomng uses, and the future land use pldll 6 The de::'lgn of the prop()~ed del,eloprnenr rnlnllnlze \ acJvel II' eflc( 1\ 1/'1( flU/lng visual, QcoustlC and olfactory and houri of OpeIC/llOn Impau \ The project mmimlzes the acoustlC and olfactory ImptlLb of the PIOJcc.\ by constructmg a 6~foot hIgh fence along the south property lJllE Lancbcdpc buffers, a parkmg garage and the fence along the north dnd south plopeny lines I11Il1UTllze the visual Impacts The project only contam,> 4 resldentlal umLS whIch w1l1 not mclude any businesses , r . EXHIBIT C ATTACHED DWELLINGS FLEXLBILlTY eRn [RIA 1 Lot area and width 1 he reduction 111 lot dl ed will not I e:;.ul t H1 d bulld mg which I') Qut of scale wnh eXIstmg btuldll1gs lJ1 the lI111nec!tate VILlJ1lty 01 the pdlCl.-1 proposed for development The proposed project IS a fOlIl-story condommIUm ploJect consl')tmg ot only 0111.- umt per floor The bUlldlllg footpllnt fi ts wlth1l1 the ex h1mg 6 479 SF 101 dnu ~tlll prOVides the reqUIred open space and parkmg spdLe~ The project IS auually a reductIOn 111 densIty from the eXisting 8-ul1It apal1ment buddlllg to d 4-11l1lt condommlUill proJ ect, theI eby rCdUc.lOg the ,",cdle () r the deve I Oflll1CIl I on the ,",1 te 2 LocdtlOn 1he use of the parcd proposed tor developmenl v,qll 110l11wo]ve d\rt~Cl access to an artenal street The one dnveway acce'3S wlll connect to BdY [::;pl(tndde which 1<; a locall()dd The project lS also a reductIOn to Ul1lt dem!ty and vehIcular tl1pS 3 Setbdcks a The I eduction mlronf ::'dbuck L-onfnbufel' /() (/ mOl e aUll,e and dynamic street life fhe eXlstmg nughborhood WhlC h IS In the, toun~l dlSlllCl, 1~ mOle leSldentJalm nature wlthout dn active MId dynamIC <:.tlcet 11fe fhc PIO)Ccl lS deSIgned to mamtalll the eAlstmg Helvor dnd senne ldeslvle \)1 thE.. surroundmg developments h The redUUlO/1 tn from \elback re ~ Ultl 1/1 all IIlIpl 0\ ed )He pI (II! UJ Improved de'J/gn and appearance The reductIOn III the front setbad, IS 101 pavement only The r)]opo,>ed bulldmg meet') the front setback rGqulrcments rhc fli:lVCl11cnl encroachment prOVIdes an dcces~ dflve dne! ~ldewalk 10 the padclllg gardgt, and pedestnal' acccs<; c The I eduGtJOrI In Side (I'/() r<!f..I" ::'e/bc.iI...k doc:o nOI p'-evt'1I! O(U:' \ \ 10 rhl:' I eCII oj any bwldmg by emergency velllc}e.) The lTIlmmUm sIde-buIldlllg setbdck I'> 00 to a proposed wooden boaldwalk proYldmg access 10 the IC31 o~ thc bulldll1g The rcm o[ the buildmg WIl! also be acce:;,slble through the first floor parkmg garage d The reductIOn 111 ~lde and rem ~e{baL-k! elul/\ lI'I un lfnproved lile plan, mOl e efficient parkmg 0/ IflJpf oved de \ 19n Gild ajJ]Jl:'w {{n.:. e The proposed ::!Ide selba(..k rcducuo!1 dl!owS fOI J 24- fOOl wldl, d! 1\I~WdY and 1 9 foot deep parking stalls WI th ll\ lhe pal klllg g<lI dgt' 'I he PIOle(;t dcrually Increases the 5etbact..s from the ClIl ren! dpalll1lCI1l cleve lOpT1lt,111 and reduces the unit den<;1ty The died.':> of the leclllC1l0n.':> \VI II be m1111mlZed by the constructton of a 6-foQI 111gb lencc along the nortb property hoe and 8-foot wide landscape buller along the south properly Ime 4 The deHgn of all bUIlding') wmphes wllh the 7'ourn{ Di\IIIU de,\/gn gUidelines 117 DIvIsIOn 5 oj Article 3 The elevatlons of the proposed buIid111g are enclosed \l1 tlm, paLkdge .':>hO\vlflg all four sides of the butldmg archltecmre The colors of the buddmg an... 81<;0 represented 10 the reduced color blllldmg elevdtlOns ~ar 31 04 Ol_57p ~adcliff~ Deve!opmer~ }27-784 UO<:(; ,,;;r,. dO C j7~ l~:: 1\ ~ I r - , rlZ.lP >\ffl:L'. uV BUT ~I ru::, ], 0 r [),,!" ~!NED [ t ?"E(,ORD~C R.EQl..JFSTED BY ",>HV Wl~E"I r,;xc O'.,>j)EI1 M.i\]L DEED TO , { " r. OC :itf.1}', a..Ef~ iF Cl1FT PIltLLi\5 WJ!T'(, ~URll)l, Ann Sb..o.w, '\ttOrJ1t',' a' Lu'>! H45 COUl' "nt-to \ SU'le 200 C'eanHle' ~hnda 3Ji<6 ", ~rLr_- ?GTJ::r<J:7 lHI-~OO2 Cf,~& ,133 Yn; 51 DED-FRl'1KS 'J[~! rilP R C((OC() Irt'0243b8b9 ~ ~Jt2 SF1J 1?\J3 E'G ~'I'l) ~WJ\Dll{i QOl ~~~ ${, DC '~\' ~~ :}?f:fl_ ' '0- !lJt - ~~ U I _~~ _ ~______ ~_ ~_ ~ _____~________L_......___~__ SP Art t"IjQ'v I: TH]S LiN [ Jois v o.rg\Jl.!a B F r J'1ls 66~ Sa v E5~ lanac'~ Cl e....rtI,J ate r Dea~ j,~ Flo"]da TD1AL QfCK qj91 ~8-IIHfD I 11 ,I (}\AtIli !If ltry~ [i[fUTY eLEA'{ $to oe $6 00 $ ec lv1A1L ~A,X .:: T!.. rE.'vIE~'T~ TO QLI'T CLA.") DEFl) Rl "':: D 'v n', rll"! R Frn R ~1 FR ,\ \ 'Sf" 02-<136869 N00-2 \-2002 8 ':SRn PTNELLRS CO 6< 123E~ PC 1?~~ i lIIi~ 111l1llU 1lI111li lllllfla 1]1 1m ml TJe t.' de[~Ig.nld Gren:o. dtclare, ,nrlT '~"1.'>f~T a, '~N':'~ C lbl~ ([I \ e\all~e :rrlj'<~'.' ow G'au :Jrs mnn, 'II (j 110' I, c'_oblc l\'lI'G L~4 ':;C' No (. or.s)d~rallO:1; cla!1g~ ..r \'e:;D.ns only '-'l~n'Jr, Vlrg~1!~!3 Frd"lh..s ,',rosr .ddre~, 'S 609 Ba, E,p,~r)J:;k C1~~r"~!~' B~~cJ.. 1'1"'10. gr~flt; ((I, \'ugl'lJa B i:'-:...d,,\, ! r', ct, \VhO$~ edCRss 15 L~r ,~m~ as gran'or or he, 5L<C'Cessor J truSl, unC'er n~ V rgcIll~ B Fl:lnh 1 ("US!, DJ!:::: ~ ~A..?i ~~~_ .W\J2, and an" arrCllamef\(s tr-~r~':;' fre [oj'c \\'IJ'8 [~dl ?ITper'" loca'e,j Lf' lbe Cot.n,y LI'-!'f,'ELl-;\'S , Slll'~ )[ "l,}ncta, J '<;' (e<.c.r-co a. fo] 10 ws Lot \\ p,.TQck. 7", Mtnd..lla, S<.lb'-\V'~j)fi Urut:- accordl:1g lC rn~ -nz:J J' via. tt>~rel)t 1.~ re~ocded In P'at 800~:0 P3j;C T' t\~"l,,-. Il;:c<nds 0 r PIN ELL'" S CCW1ty, t I(",d~ A"toUiJt Q< t'e'T'oillne q' Pa rc~1 N Q or 1'0 :,0 No 05 '~9' 15 )4 7 5 ~/O77 tHJ80 NOtC TQJ~RO?FRI': AFPRA IS[;!~ rh~ GraJ't<;, cor,;\rn5 tl-4\ uIl0<:1 t~<" terms Q, \"'1~ 1 n..~[, rci~n ~c to abc., <", th. (,r;w(Dr has n{)t leiS lllful a r.~rdioal ,rterrS1 fOIl fe and 15 en,I"cj EO a wre,tedd ta.' eX~ffil:t'Of' PU <;H;:' ,<) Ib~ pro,,'~'c-ns Dr l-I01'LJ :'d,j~ 196 O~ J I 2) E (e"ll.ed )!l_ II \\\."l~~__~ 11 p ('~EL....AS COLln'y Fi()(lJ< .. 11l1C'~ \?~~ ~~\.~~-- _Yk" I ;....., ~y ;) :~ 0(\[, .J,-t>.-t .\\ G..- CJ2 , ,,1 J~~'.j.~--~ _ Q.o:..,.__~_~_ -- ~- F ralU..S PRll'(, N'I...'Y1E \v ,llle,>~ I'RJ'\ T 1\ \ '>1 [ <;./,TE ':)? flORlDA ) 1 <: COI;I,TY OF PU~ELL'l.S ) ar\:"l..h~:..~~~bdor~me Om"d S~~______ _ r-."..lT, "ubh',I'~r;"""I'r 'p",,,,r', v'J" J f' f'laIV\, W~1'")'$ personallv kr10"D ,') rlt OR;fo;.J \' ,0 Ita~ I"od,,-c~d ~\.. . to\' "'" ~_ J~ ld~nl'f,~a 10<1 and aV~~c. ,IC( ;~'J l<.' n..' 1]',,' sh~ <:\ec lid l\1~ ,alae 111 lIef au:hor.rd Cap2(ll), aild tha' b" he' Slg~ad,c on 1,,,- nt"um~Gl ,h:;: ;~-SO~ Dr th<:" ~'lT1J .1p')~ CEr" I" ''If\\rJsh ~hr' :x.rsor ....ere:: ul C;:tc""t:L led mr: d. ~'iT'.,.lf'"'J~f 1 ',." ITN 2S$ MY b<.1l1 Jnd 0 m~u 1 ~e. i \1, C(>""1J'LS,1011 [0\ pireS _____~ ;)~~\~------- NOTAR. \' PVB,_K l'-'~~~r- .'6~iYIP"'Y-" .:; ~i'i)]rI.M~SSlOll!!. DO 11...531 ;)~EXP - JANOFi'ZOI)6~ 1 T~PO'Gh i ,~ " 4:Y?.ld,l;; y~) "'" :3 --I o o \:) 'q \:) "0 c-. -<:r > LL c-. 0 ~ \0 !- 0 ~ ('1 N C U ::J 'q U N ~ >-> 0 OJ 0' ~ CO ~ 0 0 ,,.., "" > L.... 0 r- , \:) '-' ::J 0 r" .J U < \' \ \ /' '\, \~' J , " ,,( , LL , , " "-, , 0 \.'\:, I \0 I .". ~~~ i \""-",,,- \:{' ,~ "'- . " \ " , d Il.l <d 0) l- 0 0 E L. 'f' :J , r- .... 0 ::J \0 c: U <'" Il.l > .5 -: <.> ... "" f- '-' g >-> <t L.... 'f' ..... CO (/) 'q 0: ", 01 ::l <( 0'- 0:: ... en LL Ii:: lL ~ - 0:: " lL 2: li; (/) ,,.., 'q 0 (/) Of) :3: ....:i 0 <=> ~ 0 0 Of) M 0 0\ Of) '-0 Il.l lL... 0 r- 0 l;- V) 0 r- -<:r -<:r <( <'I .". '-0 "" ~".J.... , ~~ / ." ~ ~' -" '~ ::; "-, ~ ,," > -...., '- , ~- ";:: , '- , "J ;;.- \1.....- (J r -- ~! .:J --I ~, \" \' '" 0 ' " '" ,"I -':- N c v -0 ~ ~(! --:"~"'~~r 11) '-,' " . .2 ,,-' \ ::; "I ~: , cr '" ~1 \ 1) U "" W a: '" -"'" 0 ..) CL ----. <:: r C OJ r OJ f- Cil iIJ -=- a:l @ <:: V' <( "- ...... .8 1) '-' <.... 0 OJ :3 -0 '" <:: '- ol) a :O! r CL c ./' e:::: '" cr: 0 <( CJ co f- c OJ CJ ::) --I ::::> 0 ;;; 'n 0 ;:- f" 'f' .:l W :) Il.l 0' a... , 1< EJT'H 2/-, i \C & r\SSC,- ^ ~i-'F (~ ~" ~- '''''''"') :; fNC9 " - PLANNING . -, , -~ March 24, 2004 Mr Bennett Elbo City of Clearwater Public Works Administration 100 S Myrtle Ave Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: LARISA II Dear Mr Elba This letter IS written In support of the proposed LaRlsa II condominium project regarding traffic Impacts The proposed project Includes four condominium units located on a 0 15 acre site at 669 Bay Esplanade The project also IIlcludes SIX on- site parking spaces, four located within a covered parking garage, and MO open air spaces ThiS project will also Include the demolition and removal of the eXisting 8 unit apartment complex located on the same site Based on the density reduction from the current 8-unlt apartment complex to the proposed 4 unit condominium proJect, the vehicular tnp generation Will be reduced and the level of service of Bay Esplanade will not be adversely Impacted Sl~ , /aEC , PI IPAI I C, 110-0' Keith Zayac & ~t\~jsociates~ Inc. ~ - - III I r)h,llPJ11::. [)I...\\ \ '---.l... ir ('I''' II r 11g1112e[ Il1g Ld 11c1~Cdjl( !\l chllec! .11 ( P [(1" lllle. ~CIl..~L\ H(l~ L~'jJ I t "',;:'1 ~(I_':::: (/.:..7 J 7 )1- )~0() PLnl1 (7:'1 ,1(/'-')::'" 11\ t.-.;!ll.!....=-L_~ !...~(/"!LQ.Ll.~ I~ Mr. Richard AIt, P E. Southwest Florida Water Management DIstrict 7601 HIghway 301 North Tampa, Flonda 33637 - 6759 (813) 985 7481 June 17.2004 Re. La Rlsa IT (Clearwater, Florida) SWFWMD ExemptIOn No CT 126637 KZA ProJeU No 31()-()4 Dear MI A It Pleac,e find enclosed three (3) sets of revu,eu plans tor the rel-crcncl-d pi Oject '1 he followlIlg table "ummanze" the eXIsting and proposed (revl~cd) condlUolh TotallmpervlOu~ Area (fe Vehicular Use Area ft2 Total Sill.' Area ft EXrSTING I CONDITIONS \ 5 978 19_~ 62118 I 647900 PROPOSIi,[) i CONDI110NS ~ I I 6,479 00 ~ 4,896 90 53221 J AddItIOnally, your comments are addre<'sed as tallows Pledse provIde gradmg plans to provide leasonable dssurdrKt, lhdt ploposed PIOICd wdl not Impact the adjacent Outstandmg Flonda Waters dnd Aquatic Pre.,crvc Response The gradmg plan hds been provided (see sheet 6) 2 Plalls ~how the seawall to be razed Plea,>t. provIde deldtlc, on thiS pl01~nstd ddlVI\\' 10 Pl()Vllk: reasoJlable assurance that wetlands wrllnut be, llnpacled Response The contractor will reconstrucllhe top orlhe SC<tWdll to elt:Vdll01l 5 no elm! e,\'AUS" extreme cautIon to prevent llnp,lct to wetlands (st,e ~heet 6) 3 Pledse provlde erQS10n control rneaSUT eq tu pt {.)V Ide ll".a~LHldb Ie aS~1J t dfh..L then rhe dciJ dl.L.nt \v{llt-1 resources wIll not be Impacted Response Erosion wntlol measlIle::, have been plOvlded (::,c,e sheets 4 dnd 6) ! II aRIS<I_II\DocunltIlL<;\RlclldrdAI1[<'Wt WMDII ""mpt,onRLqu,,"UJ32404 dol. PH\t\\n S J 1004 Thank you for your aSSJstance with this project Plect:,t; GQlltdct U5 It there dl(; dllY qlle5l101l~ jlllC ely, Ke h 1!yae & AS~:~~.ltes, Ine ~l /;/ ,,- I ,~c; / L/'/ ) I 91th It Zayac, P B ,RLA Pl,ies}/ent cV fiLE -.- ,-~ I \LIR Isa_II\DolUl11eln,\l{oll",r(IA III ~ W rWMO ji xlJilpllOn Rl.-q'jl.-~t_ 03240 I doo llmm ..,., "':::: ~ ~~! ~~ B:" 00 '0;; t; ~ :~ ~. ~il~ "" ~ ~~ . '<1 r~ ~ 9, \\ ,\ \\ '\ \, " ), \ \/ -.~~ ~;; " -' t~ ,,~ ~f l:~ , ~ , i , !, ,~ f.' 0 , , , 6 , , u ~ , ~ >'i , , , ~ " ,Ii ,. '" <, ~ , ~ ,-. "" 0 , H " " " " k :. i"'~'~'1...l~~J1.:...!dl..t'~''''1 ., """" """ LA R1SA n ~',:~~~==~~~~~r~ "",,", '~'Cl,i'"I~\\'An~H. FLORIDA ._('\ ll.\llCI.If,'1l IJ~:V r~LOI'M t:NT, 2-124 CUIILEW I/OAll """",.""A"~'a' ( 'I ~! ~U\ .. .. - \\)n ""0 -" &\( >=:--.-(g:;,~)--- .L ;.." x ~ ;c.;.: , I , , , i ~ ! . , ~ z o K:":rn1"!I\Y^C -.;\SSOCIAn:S.INC O\'llLNC.INl;.':.rN("_ l.,U; ~;t~~;;~:~,#~;1' ~,~. '.~""''''' ~, ',f .. ,;..." f)fiNN"", " n ,t ~ CIlSI':: 'I,~ -1I0m1VH 1\:1\Id (IVOH M:nWn V<.I'<-.. \"1 ,')"1'1 ,LN'Jl'ld013^,I(j :~,HlIJO 6Ni~'i:i<iwi'W.j) LVDC)S'SY~' :)V,\..V'1.J UJ._l)1 ,~ ~ , ~ jj { ~ ~. ~ lml ~HI ~ rlH rr., lli ~ a i. H .' lH ~f ~ t ![i ".< . ~ ~~ -~~. H~ -'" 'i t t~~: ~ ~ ~i: "',_ . -, "] ~ ~j "l ~ it; :,. ~ ~ :, ~ ~ ~' '- ! ~f,. ." ; i~~ ; ~ i ~~ ~ i ;;~ ~: t p ~; ~:5 '1'1 ~ ~: "~'1 1 -~ ~ 1; fl ~ ~ ~~1 . '.- " ~ ~ H; ! H t ; ,; h :-~~q I~~iiii~ , n \1 ~,:; -, ~ ~ !ll ! iii l t ~~ i, ~~ i ! it!IL ~~ ~I . i ~ ~ ;, ~ q ~ i' " ~~ \ 'c , , ~l i : h <( I" " ' ~i t~ : ~ ,:8 !if '~ .1 , ~. ~. "I" ~ ,- ::~ ~ , ,_I} II "I -ill J!l' " ','"<ill H~~~ iP~i , --C~'D._-.." n ,I ~ ,~ ~ o ~II " J 'I~ ~;~ ;i! i1l j" t \ ~':f\_~Jl515jJ:SSJ:iJ)':5.: II I., l~~=!il ." l!~ ~.(~ ::; () j NV'ld ::JdVJSUNv'i ,.,.:':.:e':; ~,,:::~,~,~.,';: 0 i ~ " ~ " 0 , , ~ , VCliClO'-I.,{ '<c"[,\i,\\'-!V:f,\:.,,, IJ VS"l'lJ V'1 !, r~ p ". '. 1" "'1 :i" 51 ~ ~j~ ~:~' 0' ~1,~d '-i:'~ ~ ~ '..-~,', ~l~~~~tg .,'ll!'; H;,q:;. i~lH~! . r;)~n~ GI'!,!:il " "IHhiH '0"1'"1 "'0' -0_." ~'i ~~~~;~~ w' 31 tf\~; ~'I ~I~ "1'"1, ~~( :;-1; '" (!~ 1~ ml ~i~ r H~ ~ F1! ~ .5~ . ~~: ~ i';: ,,'.0\ ~~ H d "~t ~ ~ ~ ~! O.a U"-' - .. .- cnCU ~~ i~i-'\ ~L:) "" (;'1:\ \::'.,/ ~, (,I) '1"-' 'I' (."'0\ ' \.::j") ,,1-"', \.~i) , ". ---" ft..".,.>,;' / c:,l!;:::> . "'" _ t'-;Qt\JJ ''';:-' 5"'V--: @)~f>.'(t '- t . , C L W CoverS heet ~ ~ ~ FLD2004-03018 669 BAY ESPLANADE Date Received: 03/24/2004 LA RISA II ZONING DISTRICT: T LAND USE: RFH ATLAS PAGE: 258A PLANNER OF RECORD: MHR KEITH ZAYy~\C & ASSOC'-~\TES INC. -" _ "" ~-ii:~ ~~ ~ ~ ... ........___J..~ ~ .--- , ""- ..... "'-.> ~ ~ -..... ~~.-. .,..-~---~~~~~"",- \............----~~-".::....~....-" -----~---...............~'-~-~...._-,.......-"--.,....,. ~ ~ CIVIL ENGINEERING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE: PLANNING .~~~~~~-~~~~--~- 101 PHILIPPE PARKWAY SUITE 205 SAFETY HARBOR, FLORIDA 34695 ~~ ~, PHONE 727 793 9888 FAX 727 7Y3 9855 EMAIL KEITI-lZAYAC@AOL COM .::::~==:=--=~ :- ~-: ~ ~~""'-~e--;;::: ~~::;;~ ";\ ~~d 'c;v or; r~_~"7:I: ~~~~ 'o-rrif" '-?~~'=~~~~~~-~~~~~c~~ --:~~?,,~~~~{:$..,~~~"""'l1 F1i9~~~~~~~~~-"""~ 9?f( - , , " '" w March 31 , 2004 Mr Michael H Reynolds, AICP City of ClealW8ter PlannIng Department 100 S Myrtle Ave Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: FLD2004-03018, 669 Bay Esplanade F.IL.E Dear Mr Reynolds We are In receipt of your notice of completion dated March 30, 2004 It has come to our atlentlon that the subject property IS stiff owned by VIrginia Franks, and Radcliffe Development, Company, LLC was Inadvertently listed as the property owner rather than the applicant/contract purchaser Therefore, I have enclosed one anginal copy of a revised application and deed showing the owner as Virginia Franks along with a signed affidavit to authonze agents Please Insert this application Into the previously submitted package ou for your help regarding thIs project c; r Z---- E ayac, P E , RLA Presl nt Kerth Zayac & Associates, Inc - ---RfECEnV[ElD ' MAR 3 120041' pLANN!NG DEPARTMlE~T errV' OF ClEARWAr~ft : Clearwater ':~ u~ Plannmg Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Flonda 33756 Telephone 727-562-4567 Fax 727-562-4865 flL~ - ~ CASE # DATE RECEIVED RECEIVED BY (slaff InlIlals) A HAS PAGE # ZONING DISTRICT LAND USE CLASSIFICATION SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES NORTH SOUTH WEST EAST 6- SUBMIT ~;GINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION lS- SUBMIT ~OPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION mcludmg 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans ']ti SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ l~ OD ,of' * NOTEflTOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT A (ReVIsed II /()5/O2) -PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- A APPUCANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202 A) APPLICANT NAME _Radcliffe Development, Company, LLC MAILING ADDRESS _2424 Curlew Rd , Clearwater, FL 33683 PHONE NUMBER - 727-785-4070 FAX NUMBER _727-784-0096 PROPERTY OVIINER(S) _ Virgmla Franks (Must mclude ALL owners) AGENT NAME _ Keith Zayac, P E , RLA, Robert Flynt MAILING ADDRESS _101 Philippe Parkway, Ste 205, Safety Harbor, FL 34695 PHONE NUMBER - 727-793-9888 FAX NUMBER - 727-793-9855 CELL NUMBER E-MAIL ADDRESS _keltttzayac@aolcom B PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION (Code Section 4-202 A) STREET ADDRESS _669 Bay Esplanade LEGAL DESCRIPTION _See attached sUNey PARCEL NUMBER _05-29-15-54756-077-0080 PARCEL SIZE - o 15 acres (acres, square feet) PROPOSED USErS) AND SIZE(S} _ 4 condominium units (number of dwelling uMs, hotel rooms or square footage of nonreSidential use) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S) _see exhibit A for descnptlon of requests (mclude all requested code deViatIons. e 9 reduction m reqUired number of pa[kmg spaces, speafic use, etc l ~tEClEU\;tE[j - . I"IHl\ ,) 1- . Page 1 of 6 - FleXible Development Application - City of Clearwaler PLA~N!NG DEPARTMENT CiTY OF CLEARWATER DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TOR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVJOUSl Y APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO J_ (If yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C PROOF OF OWNERSHIP (Code Section 4-202.A 5) "1- SUBMIT A COpy OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED OR AFFIDA VJT ATTESTING TO THE OWNERSHIP OF THE PROPERTY D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS (Code Section 3-913.A) '" ProVIde complete responses to the SIX (5) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each cntena IS achieved In detail The proposed development of the land Will be In harmony With the scale bulk coverage, density and character of adjacent properties In which It IS located See exhibit B for general applicability cntena responses to quesllOns 1 =6 2 The proposed development Villi not hinder or discourage the appropnate development and use of adjacent land and bUIldings or significantly Impair the value thereof 3 The proposed development Will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons reSiding or working In the neighborhood of the proposed use 4 The proposed development IS deSigned to minimIZe traffic congestion 5 The proposed developmenlls conSistent With the community character of the Immediate VICInity of the parcel proposed for development 6 The deSign of the proposed development minimIZeS adverse effects Includmg visual acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation Impacts, on adjacent propertJes ;.. Address the applicable fleXIbIlity cntena for the speCific land use as listed In ead1 ZOning Dlstnct to whld1the waiver IS requested {use separate sheets as necessary) - explain !!!r!! cntena IS achieved, In detail see exhibit C for applicable fleXibility crltena responses Page 2 of 6 - FleXible Development Application - City of Clearwater E SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS (Code Section 4-202 Al 06- K ~ M/It ..;;t.. o o SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY {Including legal descnpllon of property} - One original and 12 coples, TREE SURVEY (including eXisting trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location including dnp lines and indicating trees to be removed), LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY, PARKING DEMAND STUDY In conJunCllon With a request to make devlaliOns to the parking standards (Ie Reduce number of spaces) Pnor to the submittal of this application the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be In accordance With accepted traffic englneenng pnnclples The findings of the study Will be used In determining whether or not deViations to the parking standards are approved, GRADING PLAN as applicable, PRELIMINARY PLAT, as reqUIred (Note BUilding permits Will not be Issued until eVidence of recording a final plat IS proVIded), COpy OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable, F SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS (Code Section 4-202 A) ~ SITE PLAN WIth the follOWing information (not to exceed 24" x 36") All dimenSions North arrow Englneenng bar scale (minimum scale one mch equals 50 feet) and date prepared, location map, Index sheet referencmg IndiVIdual sheets Included In package, Footpnnt and SIZe of all EXISTING bUildings and structures, Footpnnt and size of all PROPOSED bUildings and structures, All reqUired setbacks, All eXisting and proposed pomts of access, All required Sight tnangles, Idenllficahon of enVIronmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and speCImen trees mdudmg descnptlon and locatIon of understory, ground cover vegetation and wllcllife habitats, etc, Location of all public and pnvate easements, locatIOn of all street nghts-of-way Within and adjacent to the Site, Locallon of exIstIng public and pnvate utilities, Including fire hydrants storm and samtary sewer lines manholes and 11ft stallons, gas and water lines, All parkIng spaces, dnveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas Depiction by shadmg or crosshatching of all required parking lot Intenor landscaped areas, Location of all solid waste containers recycling or trash handling areas and outSide mechanical equipment and all reqUired screening {per Secllon 3-201 (D)(I) and Index #701}, locallon of all landscape matenal, loca!lon of an onslte and offslte stonn-water management faCIlities, Locallon of all outdoor IIghilng fixtures, and Location of all eXlstmg and proposed Sidewalks ~ SITE DATA TABLE for eXlsllng, reqUired, and proposed development, In wntlenllabular fonn land area m square feet and acres, Number of EXISTING dwellmg unrts, Number of PROPOSED dwelling units, Gross floor area devoted to each use, Par1\lng spaces total number, presented In tabular form With the number of reqUired spaces, Total paved area, Including all paved parking spaces and dnveways, expressed 10 square feet and percentage of the paved vehIcular area SIZe and speCIes of all landscape matenal OffiCIal records book and page numbers of all eXlsilng utilrty easement, BUlldmg and structure heights, Impermeable surface raho (I S R), and Floor area ratio (F A R ) for all nonreSidential uses w.. REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale {6 Y, X 11) and color rendenng If pOSSible, At/AFOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE prOVide the follOWing addlilonallnfonnailon on site plan '~\ One-foot contours or spot elevations on srte, Offslte elevations If reqUired to evaluate the proposed stonnwater management for the parcel, All open space areas, Locailon of all earth or water retaining walls and earth benns, Lot lines and bUilding lines (dimenSioned), Streets and dnves (dimenSioned), BUlldmg and structural setbacks (dimenSioned), Structural overhangs, Tree Inventory prepared by a 'certified arbonsF of all trees S" DBH or greater, reflectmg Size, canopy (dnp lines) and condition of such trees Page 3 of 6 - FleXible Development Apphcatmn - City of Clearwater / ~ rJ#t G STORMWA TER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS (City of Clearwater Desig n Criteria Ma n ual and 4~202.A 21) STORMWA TER PLAN Indudlng ttle followmg requirements EXlstmg topography extending 50 feet beyond all property Imes, Proposed grading mdudmg finished froor elevallons of all structures, All adjacent streets and mUfllClpal storm systems, Proposed stormwater detenllonlretentlon area Indudlng top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure, Stormwater calculatiOns for attenuallon and water quality, Signature of Florida registered ProfeSSional Engineer on all plans and calculations CI COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval IS requIred pnor to Issuance of City BUlldmg Permit), If applicable COpy OF STATE AND COUNTY STORMWATER SYSTEM TIE-IN PERMIT APPLICATIONS, If applicable ~ lii- H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102 A) LANDSCAPE PLAN All eXISting and proposed structures, Names of abutting streets, Drainage and retention areas mdudmg swales, Side slopes and bollom elevations, Dellneallon and dimenSions of all reqUIred penmeter landscape buffe~, Sight vIsibility tnangles, DelmeatlOn and dimenSions of all parkmg areas mcludmg landscapmg Islands and curbmg, ProposeQ and required parkmg spaces, Exlstmg trees on-site and Immediately adjacent to the Site, by species size and locations, mdudlng dnpllne locallon, Size, descnpllon, speClficallons and quanblles of all eXisting and proposed landscape matenals, mcludlng botafllcal and common names TYPical plantmg details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants Including mstructlons SOil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures, Intenor landscapmg areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and Intenor landscape coverage, expressing In both square feet and percentage covered, Conditions of a prevIous development approval (e g conditions Imposed by the Commufllty Development Board), I rng atl on note s REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11) (color rendenng If possible), Q CI IRRIGATION PLAN (reqUired for level two and three approval), COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable It.. ,.: BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS (Section 4~202 A 23) ReqUired In the event the application mdudes a development where deSign standards are m Issue (e 9 Tounst and Downtown Dlstncts) or as part of a Comp1ehenSlve Infill Redevelopment PrOject or a Resldenllallnfill Project BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all Sides of all bUildings mcludmg height dimenSions, colors and matenats, REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four Sides of bUlldmg WIIt1 colors and matenals to scale (8 % X 11) (black and white and color rendenng If pOSSible) as reqUired NA Q o Q SIGNAGE (DiVISion 19 SIGNS I Section 3~1806) ~ "'~ "'7\1v'\) f"A?~ wU.(/ ~E. "7t.l~\~U All EXISTING freeStanding and attached Signs ProVIde photographs arm dllnenslons'\area height ete) Indicate whelt1er ttley Will be removed or to remain AI! PROPOSED freeslandlllg and attached signs PrOVIde details IIlcludlng location, Size, height, COlors matenals and drawlIlg Comprehensive Sign Program appllcallon, as applicable (separate application and fee reqUired) Reduced sign age proposal (8 Yo X 11) (COlor), If submitting ComprehenSive Sign Program application Page 4 of 6 - FleXible Development Application - City of Clearwater , ' r K. . TRAFFIC I~CT STUDY (Section 4-801.C) \i Includ~~ if proposed development will degrade the acceptable level of selVlce for any roadway as adopted 10 the Comprehensive Plan ~ Tnp generation shall be based on the most recent edrtJon of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Tnp General Manual Refer to SedJon4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to thiS requirement L SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made 10 1Ills appllcatJon are tNO and accurate to the best of my knowledge IInd aulhonze City representatives to VlSIl and photograph the property descnbed In thIS application ~ 1r d-~ Cr4 at fJ~ ~..to (lAul o:t -j- ~. ~ STATE OF FLORIDA. COUNTY OF PINELLAS 5U.~and subscnbed before. fTle Ihls ~ day of , A 0 20Q!.. to me and/or by , who IS personally known has produced FL- '1)a ',MA~ L. < c. as Identification p-/ 5 S '11 z.... ~ ~ I '1 () , Ko ~.el\.:f L r I (\.,f. Virginia Allen * 5882 Cl'r.t// ExpIres November 30,2007 Bonaod Troy Fan -11lWWIco 101;. lIQ"J.3&5,.7019 ~~ ~ 30'f+> /Y)1.R. ~/ IL ~ ~ r~ a...d~ j~6 {~o::Lav . ~ i:{' ~ ~~~ MARILYN KUIPERS COMMISSION' 00059498 EXPlRfS SEP 23 2005 9ONOeD THROUGH ADVANTAGE NOr.o.RY PllfCle 5 of 6 - rleXille I:levelopment ApplicatIon - City of Clearwater -- ... "'--, 'J. '. .- .~ .. SUBMIT 12 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including 1) collated, 2} stapled and 3) folded sets of SIte plans ~ ji9- SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $J Zl:JS CASE # DATE RECEIVED RECEIVED BY (staff Inrllals) ATLAS PAGE # ZONING DISTRICT E CLASSIFICATION o NDING USES OF ADJACENT TIES NORTH SOUTH WEST EAST PLANNING DE? '* NOTE 13 TOTAl SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED CITY (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) OF CLEARWATER FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION ~ Clearwater u~ ~ Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Flonda 33756 Telephone 727-562-4567 Fax 727-562-4865 lL SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION t;lJ REcel MAr< G A UIJ'f (Revised II/05f02) -PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- A APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION (Code Section 4-202 A) APPLICANT NAME _Radcliffe Development, Co, LLC MAILING ADDRESS _2424 Curlew ReI Clearwater, FL 33683 PHONE NUMBER 727-785-4070 FAX NUMBER _727-784-0096 PROPERTY OWNER(S) _Radcliffe Development Co, LLC (Must Include ALL owners) AGENT NAME _Robert Flynt, Kellh Zayac. PERLA MAILING ADDRESS _101 Philippe Parkway, Ste 205, Safety Harbor, FL 34695 PHONE NUMBER _727-793-9888 FAX NUMBER _727-793-9855 CELL NUMBER E-MAIL ADDRESS _keithzayac@aol com B PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION (Code Section 4-202 A) STREET ADDRESS _669 Bay Esplanade LEGAL DESCRIPTION _See attached survey PARCEL NUMBER _05-29-15-54 756-077-0080 PARCEL SIZE _0 15 acres (acres, square feet) PROPOSED USE(S} AND SIZE(S) _ 4 condominium units (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresldenllaluse) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S) _see exhibit A lor descnptlon of requests (Include all requested code deViations, e g reduction In required number of parking spaces, specific use, ele ) " Page 1 of 6 - FleXible Development Apphcallon - City of Clearwater ~ ~ DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS {TOR}, A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO _x_ (If yes, attach a copy of the applicable doroments) C PROOF OF OWNERSHIP (Code Section 4-202 A 5) o SUBMIT A COpy OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED OR AFFIDA VIT ATTESTING TO THE OWNERSHIP OF THE PROPERTY D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS' (Code Section 3-913 A) ~ ProVIde complete responses to the SIX (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain ~ each cntena IS achieved In detail 1 The proposed development of the land Will be In harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage density and character of adjacent properties In which It IS located See exhibit B for general applicability cntena responses to quesbons 1 =6 2 The proposed development Will not hinder or dIScourage the appropnate development and use of adjacent land and bUIldings or Significantly Impair the value thereof 3 The proposed development Will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons reSiding or working In the neighborhood of the proposed use 4 The proposed development IS deSigned to minimiZe traffic congesbon 5 The proposed development IS consistent With the community character of the Immediate VICInity of the parcel proposed for development 6 The deSign 01 the proposed development minimizeS adverse effects, including Visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operalton Impacts, on adjacent properties rid. Address the applicable fleXIbility cntena for the speatic land use as listed In each ZOning Dlstnct to whIch the waiver IS requested (use separate r sheets as necessary) - Explam how cntena IS achieved, m detail see exhibit C for applicable fleXibility criteria responses Page 2 of 6 - FleXible Development Appllcalion - City of Clearwater '- E SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS (Code Section 4-202 A) 1 ~~ ~ Q SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (mcludlng legal descnptlon of property) - One original and 12 copies, TREE SURVEY (mcludlng eXlstmg trees on site and wlthm 25' of the adjacent site, by species size (DBH 4" or greater) and location Including drip lines and mdlcatlng trees to be removed), LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY PARKING DEMAND STUDY In conJuncllon with a request to make deVIations to the parking standards (Ie Reduce number of spaces) Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be 10 accordance with accepted traffic engmeerlng prinCiples The findings of the study Will be used In detenmnlng whether or not deViations to the par1(mg standards are approved, GRADING PLAN, as applicable, PRELIMINARY PLAT, as reqUIred (Note BUilding permits Will not be Issued until eVidence of recording a final plat IS provided) COPY OF RECORDED PLAT as applicable, F SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS (Code Section 4-202 A) ~ SITE PLAN With the followmg mformallon (not to exceed 24" x 36") All dimenSions, ;7'" North arrow X/ Englneenng bar scale (mInimum scale one Inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared, ~ Location map, ~ Index sheet referencmg mdlVldual sheets mcluded 10 package, v Footprint and sIZe of all EXISTING build lOgs and structures i Footprint and size of all p~9rOSED bUlldmgs and ~tlJlC!.ures, All required setbacks, I ~ -...,,~ r~ c.t.# All eXisting and proposed pomts of access, All reqUIred sight tnangles ~ 4l, ~ ~~ IdentJficallon of enVIronmentally unique areas such as watercourses, wetlands tree masses, and speCimen trees, mcludmg descnptlon and locabon of understory, ground cover vegetallon and Wildlife habrtats etc, c?"::>. Location of all public and pnvate easements, ~ Location of all street rights-of-way wlthm and adjacent to the site ? Locallon of eXlstmg public and pnvate ulJlrtles. mcludlng fire hydrants, storm and sanrtary sewer lines manholes and lift stations. gas and water lines, Q All par1(mg spaces driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas ~ DepictIon by shading or crosshatchmg of all required par1(lng lot Intenor landscaped areas, g Location of all solid waste containers recycling or trash handling areas and outSide mechanical equipment and all reqUIred screening {per Secllon 3-201 (0)(1) and Index #701}, Location of all landscape matenal, Locabon of all onslte and offslte storm-water management faCIlities Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures, and Location of all eXisting and proposed Sidewalks "" Sl'tE DATA TABLE for eXlsllng, required and proposed development 10 wntten/tabular form It/- - Land area 10 square feet and acres, - Number of EXISTING dwelling Units, 'I . _' ~ L-' ~ _ I i z::;r:> Number of PROPOSED dwellIng Units, W~ ~ J ~r ~ 'A. ~ _ Gross floor area devoted to each use, -,/ Par1(mg spaces total number presented 10 tabular form with the number of reqUIred spaces, ~ Total paved area, mcludlng all paved par1(mg spaces and dnveways, expressed 10 square feet and percentage ofthe paved vehicular area SIZe and speCIes of all landscape matenal, OffiCial records book and page numbers of all eXlstmg utility easement, BUIlding and structure heights, Impermeable surface ratio (I S R) and Floor area ratio (F A R ) for all nonresidential uses ~ REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 Y. X 11) and color rendering If pOSSible, td' (yoR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE prOVide the followmg addlllonalmformatlon on site plan l ~\ One- t contours or spot lions on site _ Offsrte vatlons If r red to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel, All open s ace a s Location of arth or water retalnmg walls and earth berms, Lot lines d IIdlng lines (dimensioned), Stre and drlv (dimenSioned), B dmg and stru I setbacks (dimensIoned) tructural overhangs, Tree Inventory, prepared f3 ...JC q c;p "certified arborlst", of all trees 8" DBH or greater reflecting Size, canopy (dnp lines) and condItion of such trees Page 3 of 6 - FleXible Development Application - City of Clearwater '- j Jl ~ ~~ G. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS (City of Clearwater Design Criteria Manual and 4-202 A.21) STORMWA TER PLAN mcludmg the follOWing requirements EXlstmg topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines, Proposed gradmg mcludmg finished floor elevations of all structures, All adjacent streets and mUniCIpal storm systems, Proposed stormwater detention/retention area mcludmg top of bank toe of slope and outlet control structure Stormwater calwlatJOns for attenuation and water quality, Signature of Flonda registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calwlalions COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval IS reqUIred pnor to Issuance of City BUlldmg Permit), If applicable COpy OF STATE AND COUNTY STORMWATER SYSTEM TIE-IN PERMIT APPLICATIONS, If applicable H. t ~ C1 LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) LANDSCAPE PLAN A II exlS ling a nd proposed struGtu res Na mes of abutllng streets, Dramage and retention areas mcludlng swales Side slopes and bottom elevations Delineation and dimenSIOns of all reqUIred penmeter landscape buffem, Sight VISibility tnangles, Delmeatlon and dimenSions of all parkmg areas mcludmg landscapmg Islands and curbmg, Proposed and required parking spaces, Busting trees on-site and Immediately adjacent to Ihe Site, by speCies size and locallons, mcludlng dnphne / Location, SIZe, descnptlon, speCIfications and quantllles of all eXlstmg and proposed landscape matenals, mcludlng botanical and common names, Typical planling details for trees, palms, shrubS and ground cover plants Including Instructions, SOil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures, lntenor landscapmg areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and Intenor landscape coverage, expressing In both square feet and percentage covered, Conditions of a prevIous development approval (e g condllions Imposed by the Commumty Development Board), Imgalion notes REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 Y.i X 11) (color rendenng If pOSSible), IRRIGATION PLAN (reqUIred for \evel two and three approval), o COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS (Section 4-202 A 23) ReqUired In the event the appllcatlon mcludes a development where design standards are In Issue (e g Tounst and Downtown DlstnGts) or as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment PrOject or a Resldenllallnfill Project ~ if BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all Sides of all bUildings Includmg height dimenSions colors and malenals, i6 /REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four Sides of bUlldmg WIth colors and malenals to scale (8 'h X 11) (black and white and color f" rendenng If pOSSible) as required J SIGNAGE (DIVISion 19. SIGNS / Section 3-1806) t7~ &.>~ ~ W1Vl- ;j" /'" All EXISTING freestandmg and attached signs, PrOVIde Photographs~me~"~ll , c, lcate whether they Will be l~ removed orto remain o All PROPOSED freestandmg and attached signs, PrOVIde details mcludlng location, size height, colors, malenals and draWing o Comprehensive Sign Program appllcabon, as applicable (separate appllcatJon and fee reqUired) o Reduced slgnage proposal (8 Y.i X 11) (color), If submitting ComprehenSive Sign Program appllcallon Page 4 of 6 - FleXible Development Application ~ City of Clearwater ,. ... K TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY (Section 4-801 C) \i Include as required If proposed development Will degrade the acceptable level of sel'Vlce for any roadway as adopted In the Comprehensive Plan ~ Tnp generation shall be based on the most recent editIOn of the Ins\Ilule of Transportation Engineer's Tnp General Manual Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for excepllons to thiS reqUirement L. SIGNATURE. I, the undersigned acknowledge that all representations made In this apphcatlon are true and accurate to tI1e best of my knowledge and authonze City representatives to VISit and photograph the property descnbed In thiS application STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS ", It ~"Yo~ to J and subscribed before. {fie thiS ~ day of -M~ . AD 20~ to me and/or by . who IS personally known has produced FL '1)rtrv'\'A1- LI ~ <: as Idenllficatlon FI.fS"3 '1 f z.... ~ If r ~ 0 't<o~.eJLi L PI rvt. Vlrginaa Allen ~ 5882 ao p..W ExpIres November 30,2007 80naea Troy Fan Insur.n;e Inc 800-385-7019 Page 5 of 6 - FleXible Development Appllca\lon - City of ClealWater ..J EXHIBIT A DESCRIPTION OF REQUESTS . Reductlon of mimmum lot area from 10,000 s f to 6,479 s f . ReductIOn of mInImum lot wIdth from 100 feet to 60 feet . Reduce front setback from 15 feet to 1 foot mmimum . Reduce sIde setback from 10 feet to 0 mInimum . Reduce rear setback from 20 feet to 6 feet ffillllmum ) EXHIBIT B GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA RESPONSES I The proposed development of the land wtll be m harmony w1th the scale, bulk, wverage, demIty and charader of acljacent propertle!'J tn wh1ch 1t I!'J lowted Rather than bemg 10 harmony with the character of the eXlstmg older multI-famtly projects located adjacent to the site, the projcct will set a new standard for the neIghborhood, simIlar to LaRlsa I The proposed proJcct WIll however mamtam the character of Clearwater Beach With the proposed Mediterranean architectural theme and small-scale condomInIUm development The project does not devmte from the permItted uses III the Tounst Zomng District and represents a decrease in density from the existmg 8-umt apartment complex to 4 condommlUm umts The character of the prOjcct IS an upscale condommlUm development With upgraded architectural fimshes and textures 2 The proposed development wtll not hmder or d1scourage the appropnate development and use of adjacent land and butldIngs or sIgmficantly lmpmr the value thereof The proposed development is conSIstent With the eXisting surroundmg and proposed land uses The project WI]] be consistent with the re-dcvelopment of LaRtsa I to the east, and set a positive example for the redevelopment of the adjacent propertIes to the north and south when appropnate The value of the abuttmg propertlcs will not be compromised, and will hkely be enhanced by the development of the project 3 The proposed development w1ll not adversely affect the health or safety or persons reSiding or working in the ne1ghborhood of the proposed use The reduction In denSity from 8 eXlstmg apartment to 4 proposed condomInIUm umts would decrease the vehicular traffic along Bay Esplanade There are no proposed uses other than resIdentlal that will have a detnmental effect on the health of persons residmg or workmg m the neIghborhood 4 The proposed development 1S deSigned to m1nlmlZe traffic wngestlOn The proposed development IS deSigned to reduce the vehIcular traffic through the reductIOn of umts from 8 apartments to 4 cOndOmInIUmS The reqUIrcd parkmg will be provided on-site and mamly withm an enclosed parkmg garage 5 The proposed development IS conSIstent With the commumty character of the Immedzate VIC.In1ty of the parcel proposedfor development The parcels ImmedIately to the north and south are currently multI-family developments The parcel to the east contams the approved LaRlsa I multi-famIly L~ , -,) prOject Therefore the project IS consistent with the eXlstmg and proposed uses, current zomng uses, and the future land use plan 6 The de~lgn of the propo~ed development mInImIZeS adver~e effects, Includmg Vlsual, acowtlL and olfactory and hours of operatIOn Impacts The prOject mmimlzes the acoustic and olfactory Impacts of the project by constructmg a 6-foot high concrete wall along the south and north property lines Landscape buffcrs, a parkmg garage and the wall along the north, and south property hnes mmimlze the vIsual Impacts The project only contams 4 resIdentIal umts, WhICh wIll not mclude any busmesses EXHIBIT C A TT ACHED DWELLINGS FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA 1 Lot area and Width The reductIOn m lot area will not result m a bUlldmg which is out of scale wIth eXIstmg bUlldmgs m the Immediate VICIlll ty of the parcel proposed for development The proposed proJect IS a four-story condommlUm project conslstmg of only one Ulllt per floor The bUlldmg footprInt fits withm the eXlstmg 6,479 s f lot and still provides the reqUired open space, parkmg spaces The project IS actually a reductIon III denSity from the existmg 8-unit apartment bUlldmg to a 4-umt condommlum project, thereby reducing the scale of the development on the site 2 LocatIon The use of the parcel proposed for development will not Involve direct access to an arterIal street The one dnveway access wIll connect to Bay Esplanade which IS a local road The project IS also a reductIon In umt denSIty and vehicular trIpS 3 Setbacks a The reductIOn m front setback contrIbutes to a more actIve and dynamIC street life The existmg neIghborhood, WhICh III the tounst dIstflct, IS more residential m nature Without an actIve and dynamIC street life The project IS deSigned to mamtam the eXlstmg flavor and senne lIfestyle of the surroundmg developments b The reducllon In front setback results In an Improved SIte plan or Improved deSign and appearance The reductIon m the front setback is for pavement only The proposed bmldmg meetmgs the front setback reqUIrements The pavement encroachment proVides an access dnve to the parkmg garage, two parkmg spaces and adequate site distance for vehicular traffic pulling out onto Bay Esplanade c The reductIOn m !>lde and rear setback does not prevent access to the rear of any butldIng by emergency veh,cle:J The mInImUm Side buildmg setback IS 7.6 ft which allows access to the rear of the bUIldmg The requested mInimUm Side setback reductIon IS for pavement which WIll be acceSSIble The rear of the bUIldmg will also be accessible through the first floor parkmg garage d The reductlOn In slde and rear setback results In an lmproved site plan, more effiCient parkmg or Improved deSign and appearance The proposed setbacks to the bUIldmg and pavement allow for a 24 foot Wide dnveway and 19 foot deep parkmg stalls and a rear patIO area adjacent to the waterfront The project deSIgn actually Increases the setbacks from the current apartment development and reduces the unit I ~_ .... density The effects of the reductIOns will be minImized by the constructIOn of a 6 foot high wall along the north and south property lmes 4 The design of all buzldmgs complzes wllh the Tourist District design guldelmes m D,vmon 5 of Article 3 The elevatIons of the proposed buIldmg are enclosed m tlus package showmg all four Sides of the bUlldmg architectural deSIgn The colors of the bUlldmg are also represented m reduced color bUlldmg elevatIons and submitted color chip pamt samples K-E:lTH ZA~~C & ASSOC-~_ \TE:S, INC. CIVIL E:NGINE:E:RING-~ ~- J -~-LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE: - - PLANNING - ~~~~---~ ~-~ 101 PH1LIPPE PARKWAY SUITE 205 SAFETY HARBOR, FLORIDA 34695 PHONE 7277939888 FAX 7277939855 EMAIL KEITHZAYAC@AOL COM ~ c:- ~~ .::~~- =~ ~, - ~--=~ -..,. .....z::.-.=4-~~~---.."-...=>'b~~\{.,.......~~~_ _ ....._ =:e\. ~ __ ~~ ~~~,..-.::,~~~~~ ~-~~~~~~-~~~....:::.. ~"",,--,,-.Q...,-~'0~C~-~~~v==~~~6? March 24, 2004 Mr Bennett Elbo City of Clearwater Public Works Administration 100 S Myrtle Ave Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: LARISA II Dear Mr Elbo This letter IS wntten In support of the proposed LaRlsa II condominIum project regarding traffic Impacts The proposed project Includes four condominium units located on a 0 15 acre site at 669 Bay Esplanade The project also Includes SIX on- site parking spaces, four located within a covered parking garage, and two open air spaces ThIS project wIll also Include the demolitIon and removal of the eXisting 8 unIt apartment complex located on the same site Based on the density reduction from the current 8-unlt apartment complex to the proposed 4 Unit condominium project, the vehicular tnp generation will be reduced and the level of servIce of Bay Esplanade will not be adversely Impacted JOHNSON, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURl _, LLP ATTORNEYS AND COUNSFI LORS AT LAW Ii E D ARMSTRONG III BRUCE H BOKOR JOHN R BONNER SR . GUYM BURNS JONA THA."I" S COLEMAN STACY COSTNER MICHAEL T CRONIN ELIZABETH J DANIEl"':' BECKY FERRIoLL-ANTON COLLE ioN M FI YNN MARION HALE scorr C ILGENFRITZ FRANK R JAKFS TIMOTHY A JOHNSON JR SHARON E KRICK ROGER A LARSON JOHN R LAWSON, JR' LEANNE LETlZE MICHAEL G U ITLE MICHAbL C MARKHAM LACHARY D MESSA A R CHARLIE' "lEAL TROY J PERDUE F WALLACE POPE JR ROB~R] V POTrER JR AUDREY B RA UCHW A Y DARRYl R RICHARDS PcIER A RIVIoLLlNI DI:NNIS G RUPPEl" CHARLES A SA.\1ARKOS PHlll1'!vI SHASTEEN JOAN M VFCCHIOLI STEVEN H Wl::INB~RGcR JOSEPH J WEISSMAN STEVEN A WILLIAMSON 'O~ COUNSEL PLCASC REPLY TO CLEAR W A ITR FILE NO 10108455 July 19, 2004 Community Development Board 100 S Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Flonda 33752 Re The La Rlsa II Development ("LaRlsa II") located at 669 Bay Esplanade, Clearwater, Florida ("Property"), Case #FLD2004~03018 (the "Project") Dear Board Members This correspondence IS Intended to address the Application for the Project In light of the Staff Report, and to Indicate how the gUIdelines of Beach by DeSign and, speclflcally, the Old FlOrida Dlstnct, are being met Property Description and Character. The Property IS located on the east side of Bay Esplanade, approximately 300 feet south of Somerset Street The western property line of the Property abuts Clearwater Harbor The current zOning classifIcation IS Tounst Dlstnct (T) The land use deSignation IS Resort FaCIlities HIgh (RFH) The Property IS located In the "Old Flonda Dlstnct" of the Beach by DeSign Community Redevelopment Dlstnct As the Staff Report notes, the area has been deSignated for multi-family townhomes and condominiums of low to mld-nse. The only redevelopment that has occurred In the Immediate VICinity IS the "La Rlsa I" project due west from the Project, on the west side of Bay Esplanade To the north and south of the Property are mostly small hotels and multI-family, two-story dwellings, which are of an aged nature and all resting on grade The hotels and/or dwellings In the area are close together With little or no setback lines and Insufficient off-street parking The parking along Bay Esplanade IS almost exclUSively on street parking which requires backing Into the nght-of-way The conditions are SimIlar to the dwellings along Somerset ~----~~- ~ --- - ---. ----- i ) _cH =... [E rJ ~~ ~ ~7 FJ rr~-....... \ j ~,-- \ (r IS I 1--' I n' ill ) 1 i \0 s L~ ! I \ ' d ..-...-/\ lJJ' j l II 1 TAMPA OHICh I' I ., lOON TAMPAST 'Il n } JIl I 9?fl18 Il """ I pon~~~~hl~~x 1100 J l! I 1 TAMPA FLORIDA 3360] 1100 I I I ThLEPHO]'.'E (81 J) 225 2500 TELECOPIER (&1]) 223 ') J] 8 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT . I SERVICES i C!,.I:ARW A TER OHlCE 911 CHESTNUT S I pas r O~ FICE BOX 1]6& ClXARWATER, FLORIDA 33757-1368 TFl..hPHONE (727) 461 181& TE!,.ECOP1ER (n7l462 0365 JOHNSON, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURl _, LLP ATTORNFYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW ~ July 19, 2004 Page 2 Somerset IS the street Immediately north of Bay Esplanade At the westerly end of Somerset there IS an approved redevelopment condominium project (15-17 Somerset) which IS five stones over parkmg (62 feet), and determined by the Board to be a "mld-nse" Also, at Chalets on White Sands, the height IS five stones over parking (56 feet) and was also determined by the Board to be an acceptable mld-nse Finally, on the west side of Bay Esplanade, the approved redevelopment that Staff has used to "offlclally" set the standard for a mld-nse heIght IS SIX stones over parking (70 feet) The height of the requested Project IS four units over parking, at only 51 83 feet The Reauest" The Applicant requests only side setbacks In conformity with a Level One ReView under the Clearwater Community Development Code ("Code") Applicant IS not requesting a ReSidential Inflll, transfers of Development Rights or any Increase In denSity SpecIfically, the Applicant requests relief as follows 1 Reduce the minimum lot area from 10,000 square feet to approximately 6,500 square feet due to the substandard nature of the lot, 2 Reduce the minimum lot Width from 100 feet to 60 feet, again, due to the substandard nature of the lot, 3 Reduce the front setback along Bay Esplanade from 15 feet to 6 feet to pavement, 4 Reduce the Side (south) setback from 10 feet to zero feet to wooden walkway, 5 Reduce the Side (north) setback from 10 feet to 8 feet to bUilding, 6 Reduce the rear setback from 20 feet to 10 feet to deck, and 7 Increase the height from 35 feet to 51 83 feet (as measured from base flood elevation). Guidelines for the Old Florida District in Beach bv DesiQn: Beach by DeSign In the Old Flonda Dlstnct contemplates 1 Favonng residential uses. 2 The use of retail uses that are neighborhood serving 3 New construction where renovation of eXisting Improvements IS not practical 4 New Single-family dwellings and townhouses ar~_~_J2r~ferred form of development \I Oi lE ~ It ~ ~ ~ If\\: \ \ ;' r----l! 1:!J1 \ It! r I t JUl I 9 ?On~ \ l~ ~~- i I \ t 1 , - L I~} \), \-- 1 , L_-...- I PLANNING & reVELOPMENl \ SERW:ES _ ~ .......~..... ....... rl,,-rt:O JOHNSON, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURl ,LLP A I TORNEY SAND COU N ~r:LLORS A T LAW July 19, 2004 Page 3 5 DensIties In the area should be generally limited to the denSity of eXisting Improvements 6 BUIlding height should be low to mld~rlse In accordance with the Community Development Code 7 Lack of parking may hinder revItalization "particularly on Bay Esplanade,1I Response: The use proposed by the Applicant IS consistent With the residential uses In the Old Florida District Renovation of the eXisting use of the Property IS nearly ImpOSSible and would not be encouraged, as It [S a nonconforming eight-Unit, two-story apartment bUIlding The Project will Significantly reduce the traffiC on Bay Esplanade The Applicant's project will replace a non-conforming use that carnes tWIce the denSity as permitted under current Code standards, and keep Within the denSity reqUIrements of the Code (4 Units) In conjunctlon With ItS sister project, La Rlsa I, located dIrectly to the west on Bay Esplanade, the Project wIll create a catalyst for renovation, reVitalization and new development extending north and south along Bay Esplanade The architecture of the Project IS Mediterranean ReVival, which IS consistent With a tropical theme The quality of the structure and ambiance of the Units IS consistent With an upscale, elegant beach community The colors used are consIstent With the palette suggested In Beach by DeSign Landscaping will be conforming to the Clearwater Beach community and wIll be much Improved, as the ImperviOus Surface Ratio will be reduced to 75 (well below the maximum of 95) and much of the additional ground surface Will be landscaped Furthermore, the mterlor landscaping IS 100% more than reqUIred by Code The Project IS consIstent WIth the denSity permitted by T and RFH. The denSity IS thirty (30) Units per acre and therefore, the four (4) dwelling Units proposed are permitted on the Property The Applicant has speCifically deSigned the Project so as to remove all parking from the view of the street and house them inSide of the bUIlding The frontage of the Property Will be pedestrian friendly and Will Include landscapmg, SIdewalks and an enhanced walking area The proposed bUlldmg uses _..!lurn~r9!!~ J:.~ueL_deslgn~.technlques to create a pleaSing and aesthetically pleasant bUII~In~,::::cRnSl~!ent-:w,ltI1-tht3: Beach by DeSIgn, Design GUIdelines -, \ I ;::::, I' I ',": J I, \1:)11 I, _J l j"'. \ I v",,~- J L---...-l' \1, . .; F- ~-~-~: I )); '~ JUI I 9 ?nr) 1 I 'I _<=r/j 1_\ ] ~-""""""" ! l _ ___________J t \ r'lj (\.'t III.j(, EA r;;:::VE:.L OPMENT I SFF-n/1crS ~ (,II~. OF C,J_. I: ".;;1 ER JOHNSON, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURL..., LLP ATTORNIoYS AND C.OUN~ELLORS AT LAW . July 19, 2004 Page 4 Scale: The Issue regarding height IS whether or not the Project, as a four-story bUilding above minimum floor elevation, meets the definitIon as a "mid-rise bUIlding II We beheve It does As you know the Staff wIth the support of the Board has used La Rlsa I, due west from this Project, as the benchmark for a mid-rise height at 70 feet above FEMA This PrOject IS barely 51 feet over FEMA AdditIonally, at the westerly end of Somerset there IS an approved redevelopment condominium project (15-17 Somerset) which IS five stones over parking (62 feet), and determined by the Board to be a "mld-nse" Also, at Chalets of White Sands, the height IS five stones over parking (56 feet) and was determIned by the Board to be an acceptable mld-nse Therefore, we beheve this Project IS well within the height recommendations of a mld-nse bUIlding In the Old Flonda Dlstnct of Beach by Design The Applicant respectfully requests that the Request set forth above be permitted and approved by the City In accordance with the Site Plan submitted Yours very truly, JOHNSON, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, LLP TroyJ 1t323942 vl - Radcliffe lansall Presentation ,-r:::..:", r?~ rr::J n---':;-;; 1:- ":J -:-:. :=-~ --- I: ---'" \ L::1lj ,- '-~ 1\ II r~ I \, :11 )' b\,,_,/IClj ~/ j~ Ii'" \ i I ~<~' _ _~_J _:::I \ 1 'I l ----- I I', I r \ I I, ) I' ~', I I, J II, 11 i 0 II! Il ) U ! JUL I ,,?r11 I! "'" 11 I' JI_- 1 I L_________ i I PLAi,NIi'.JG & r':;:V[LOPMENT I S I,::FP!I( ES ' GITl' ~)r CU.: \ i\Nt~l FR f) f -.J. FILE COPV Keith Zayac & Associates" Inc. CIVIl Engmeenng, Landscape Arclutecture, Plannmg 701 Enterpnse Road E , Ste 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 (727) 793-9888 Phone (727) 793-9855 Fax kelth@kelthzayac com TO: MIchael Reynolds DATE: June 17,2004 CIty of Clearwater JOB #: 31 0-04 100 S Myrtle Ave RE: LaRlsa II Clearwater, FL 33756 n 1,lfJ:_J:~ ~ \V! J~ l WE ARE SENDING YOU THE FOLLOWING ITEMS j I~I [x ] Attached [ ] Under Separate Cover via Hand lJ LI Jl!' I 1 7 ~:~i [ ] Shop Drawmgs [ ] Pnots [ ] Plans [ ] Samples [ ] Copy of Letter [ ] Change Order [ ] SpecificatIOn P1.AI'4~]-See-Be~ow .hl. ~ - ( I COPIES DATE DESCRIPTION 15 Apphcatlon, proof of ownershiP, attachments A, B & C 15 Survey, oarkmg letter 15 CIvIl, ArchItectural & Landscaoe Plans & reductIons IS Storm water calculatIons THESE ARE TRANSMITTED As Checked Below [ x] For approval [] ReViewed, no comments [ ] For your use [] ReVIewed, comments as noted [ ] As requested [] Returned for corrections [ ] For reVIew and comment [ ] Resubmit _ copIes for approval [ ] Submit _ copies for dlstnbutloo [ ] Return _ corrected prmts cc: SIGNED: NAME: TITLE: REMARKS: kelth@kelthzayac com OR\ G\NAl r~ , ' Keith Zayac & Associates. Inc. CIVil Englneenng, Landscape Archttecture, Planmng 701 S Enterpnse Road E , Ste 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 (727) 793-9888 Phone (727) 793-9855 Fax kerth@.kelthzavac com June 17,2004 Mr MIke Reynolds City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: FLD2004-03018-669 BAY ESPLANAOE Dear Mr Reynolds Enclosed please find 15 copies of the revised CIVil englneenng plans addressing comments received at the June 10, 2004 DRC meeting Including the folloWing GENERAL ENGINEERING 1 The fire seMce pipeline to the standpIpe has been revised per DRC meeting comments 2 The fire service hne has been revised to 4n dIameter FIRE 1 The FDC has been revIsed to be on a freestandIng pIpe 2 Note #8 has been revised to Include "and hydrantsn 3 It IS acknowledged that comments 2 through 6 Will be addressed pnor to pennlt on the bUilding plans 7 A note has been added to the plans calling for a Knox Key Box 8 The wet standpipe has been reVIsed per request 9 It IS acknowledged that comment 9 Will be addressed pnor to bUilding pennl1: LAND RESOURCES 1 The tree Infonnatlon requested Will be redhned on the plans upon receipt of the two miSSing trees as prevIously requested dock by dock Will LANDSCAPING 1 The landscaping deSign was Intended to allow planting only shrubs that can be removed or relo not be accessIble to thiS project t.; .,. 2 A curb has been added to the front dnveway 3 The sprengem fem has been replaced with Lily Turf STORMWATER 1 A cross section of the pond IS Included WIthin the plans 2 The mean hIgh tIde of elevation 2 50 has been used for the design A drawdown analysIs Will be provIded pnor to pennlt PLANNING 11 The site plan now shows all dimenSions, footpnnt and SIZe of the bUilding, setbacks, accessways and site tnangles Notes on the sIte plan state that there are no environmentally umque areas or easements on the site The parking spaces are Identified WIthIn the bUildIng, as IS the solid waste area The outdoor lightIng IS attached to the bUildIng as stated on the site plan The proposed walkways are show on the plans 1 2 The site has been reVIsed to provide 8 ft north SIde buffer, 6 ft front buffer, and 0 ft south Side buffer Due to the geometry of the bUilding and required life-safety staIrways, thIS IS the best site deslQn possible 1 3 The use of the Mure docks Will be limited to LaRlsa I and LaRlsa 11 resIdents 1 4 The site plans shows all buildIng columns 1 5 The screemng of the plans has been modified for c1anty 1 6 The Width of the stairs IS Included on the site plan 1 7 The floor plans In the last submittal are consistent 1 8 The restroom/shower IS for residents using the deck and dock 19 The cabanas, as previously explained are for the use of LaRlsa I & II residents for changing, storage and pnvacy while USing the deck and future docks 1 10 The two sets of staIrs are requIred by City code 2 There are no known easements on the SIte 3 4 5 The demolition plan as show IS depicted to show everything 0 6 The dock has been revised to proVIde a 10-foot rear Redevelopment application fonn IS not needed 7 The site plan has been reVISed to Include Infonnatlon requested , ( .. 8 A color landscape plan IS Included 9 The site plan notes have been consohdated as requested 10 The site data table has been revised as requested 11 A separate SIgn application will be submitted as stated on the site plan 12 The applicatIOn fonn remaIns as submItted 13 The bUilding and stairs are dImensioned 14. The proposed Side setback has been revised to 00 feet to the wooden deck Sincerely, Kerth E Zayac, P E , RLA PreSident Keith Zayac & ASSOCiates, Inc 1 ; Clearwater o~ ~ Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Flonda 33756 Telephone 727-562-4567 Fax 727-562-4865 CASE #. DATE RECEIVED RECEIVED BY (staff Initials) ATLAS PAGE # ZONING DISTRICT LAND USE CLASSIFICATION SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES NORTH SOUTH WEST EAST ~ SUBMIT ~~GINAl SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION 1\ SUBMIT )2tOPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION Including 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans JL SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ l1O?'- t~ * NOTE )a'fOTAl SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION (Rev JsOO 11/05/02) -PLEASE TYPE OR PRlNT..... A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME _Radchffe Development, Company, LLC MAILING ADDRESS _2424 Curlew Rd . ClealWater, FL 33683 PHONE NUMBER _727-785-4070 FAX NUMBER _727-784-0096 PROPERTY OWNER{S) _ Vll'gtma Franks (MUst Include ALL owners) AGENT NAME _ Kelth Zayac, P E , RLA, Robert Flynt MAILING ADDRESS _101 Philippe Par\l.way, Ste 205, Safety Harbor, FL 34695 PHONE NUMBER _727-793-9888 FAX NUMBER - 727-793-9855 CELL NUMBER E-MAIL ADDRESS _kelthzayac@aol com B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4.202.A) STREET ADDRESS _669 Bay Esplanade LEGAL DESCRIPTION _See attached sUNey PARCEL NUMBER _05-29-15-54756-017-0080 PARCEL SIZE - o 15 acres (acres, square feet) PROPOSED USE(S) AND SIZE(S) _ 4 condominium Units (number of awellmg urnts hotel rooms or square footage of nonresJdenbal use) DESCRIPTION OF RECUEST{S) _see exhibit A for descnp!lon of requests (Include all requested code deVIations, e 9 reduction m reqUired number of parking spaces. specific use, etc) - rF='\~T~"(':-Th II WT~ R \ , ;\\\~I'~1,.';;~-' .. -..or I 1 i I Page 1 of 6 ~ FleXible Development AppllC8bon - City of Clearwater \ \' \\ Jt.::i , 7 !OU~ I I \l ,_ L,_---- _< .. l" l \. I l ~ ~ t LI".. ,:.:.,~_~___--- , ..--- ..........- , OOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TOR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PlANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PlAN? YES _ NO _x_ (dyes, attach a copy of the applicable dOalments) C, PROOF OF OWNERSHIP; (Code Section 4-202 A.S) i SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITlE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED OR AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING TO THE OWNERSHIP OF THE PROPERTY D WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS (Code Section 3-913,A) J.. ProVIde complete responses to !he six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - explain !!2l!'! each crrtena IS achieved, In detail The proposed development of the land will be In harmony WIIt1 the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties m which It IS located See exhibit B for general applicability cnlena responses to questions 1=6 2 The proposed development WIll not hInder or dIscourage the appropnate development and use of adJ80ant land and bUildings or slgmficantly Impair the value thereof 3 The proposed development will not advernely affect the health or safety or persons resIding or working In the neighborhood of the proposed use 4 The proposed development IS deSigned to mmlmlz.e traffic congestion 5 The proposed developmentrs consistent with the community character of the Immediate VICinity of the parcel proposed for development 6 The deSign of the proposed development minimIzes adverse effects, Including VIsual, acoustlc and olfactory and hours of operatlon Impacts, on adJaoant properties '1 Address the applicable flexibility crIlena for the speCIfic land use as listed In each Zonmg DIStnct to which the waiver IS requested (use separate sheets as necessary) - explain ~ cntena IS achieved, In detail see exhibit C for applIcable fleXibility crrtena responses j \ I ;" l U~.l _~l \ _-----~ J."" Page 2 of 6 - FleXIble Development Application - CIty of ~arWaler'! ) ,: (-: E.~R'[II.~ __._ ---- L "~ ....----- '" ,. I I li{J If J} .d... E. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (lndudlng legal desonpIJon of property) - One original and 12 copies, TREE SURVEY Ondudlng existing trees on sIIe and Within 25' of the adjacent site, by specres, Size (DBH 4" or greater), and location mdudlng dnp nnes and mdlcallng trees to be removed), LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY, ~JJ tiN#' ~ lit.. PARKING DEMAND STUDY In conjuncllon With a request to make devIations to the parkmg standards (Ie Reduce number of spaces) PrIOr to the submittal of thiS applicatIon, the methodology of such study shalf be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shan be in accordance with accepted traffjcengl~e~nn~~~I~s The findings of the study Wilt be used In determlmng whether or not deVlabons to the parlung standards are approved, ~ GRADING PLAN, as applicable, 1:1 1:1 PRELIMINARY PLAT, as reqUIred (Note Bultdmg permits witt not be ISSUed until eVIdence of recording a final plat IS provIded), COpy OF RECORDED PLAT, as appllcable, F SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) ,.. SITE PLAN wrth the following Information (not 10 exceed 24" x 36") All dimenSIOns, North arrow, Englneenng bar scale (minimum scale one Inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared, location map, Index sheet referencing mdlVldual sheets Induded m package, Footpnnt and size of alt EXISTING buildings and structures, Foolpnnt and S1l:e of aft PROPOSED bUlldmgs and structures, All reqUlfed setbacks, All eXlsbng and proposed pOints of access, All reqUired Sight Inangles, Iderrtlficatlon of environmentally umque areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and speCImen trees, Indudmg descnpbon and locatIOn of understory, ground cover vegetabon and wildlife habitats, ate, locatIon of aU public and pnvate easements, Locebon of a II street rights-of-way wlttun a nd adjacent to the SIte, Locellon of eXIsting pubhc and pnvate ullli!les, Indudlng fire hydrants storm and sanitary sewer tines, manholes and 11ft stahons, gas and water Ilnes, Ail park.ing spaces, dnveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas, Oeplcllon by shading or crosshatching of all reqUired par1ung lot mterlor landscaped areas, locallon of alt solid waste contamers, recyctmg or trash handlmg areas and outsIde mechamcal equipment and alt required screenmg {per Secllon 3-201(0)(1) and Index #701}, Location of aU landscape matenal, Locallon of all onSlte and offsrte storm--water management faCilItieS, LocaIJon of all outdoor lighting fixtures and Locebon of at! eXlsllng and proposed sidewalks t)S... SITE DATA TABLE for eXlsllng, required, and propnsed development, In wnllenltabular form land area in square feet and acres, Number of EXISTING dwelling uMs, Number of PROPOSED dwellmg Units, Gross noor area devoted to each use, ParkIng spaces tolal number, presented In tabular form with the number of required spaces, Total paved area, Includmg all paved parking spaces and dnveways, expressed In square feat and percentage of the paved vehicular area SIZe and speaes of aU landscape material, OffiCIal records book and page numbefs of all existing utIlity easement, BUIlding and structure heights, Impermeable surface rallo (I S R), and Floor area ralio (FAR) for alt nonreSIdential uses jJ REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 'h X 11) and color rendenng If pOSSible, =--_ _ Q FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the fOItOWIn<dah~r~formatJon on site plan r ~ ~ t~ 1 _ One-foot contours or spot eJevabons on site, rv 11 .. "n--u>-.:..... I _ 0ffsIte eleval10ns If reqUired to evaluate the proposed sIormwa r management for the parcel, j I' All I I open space areas, JUN 1 7 2f1~!& :11" locallon of all earth or waler retaining walls and earth berms, U.. ~ . lot IIflElS and building lines (dimensioned), j L_ Streets and drtves (dimenSIOned), ____._ _ ___ BUildIng and structural setbacks (dlmen&loned), F 'J\r,,'\ '... \ OEIJi.' _ ~JT ~ " stnJcturaloverhangs, CI fl.' OF C! ~ .IER Tree Inventory, prepared by a "certified arbonsf', of aft trees 8" DBH or greater, refiedlng SIZe. cenopy-{dnp linea) and-condrtlon of sum trees Page 3 of 6 - Flexible Developmenl Application - City of CleslWater 1 t ~ G. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS (City of Clearwater Design Criteria Manual and 4-202.A.21 ) STORMWATER PlAN mcludlng the following requirements Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property hnes, Proposed grad Ing Includ Ing fi nlshed floor elavatlo ns of a II structl.lres All adjacent streets and mUniCipal storm systems, Proposed stormwater delenbonlretenllon araa InclUding top of bank toe of slope and outlet control structure, Stormwater calculallons for altenuabon and water quality, Signature of Flonda registered Professional Engineer on an plans and calculalions COpy OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHVVEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT D!STRICT {SWFVIIMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval IS reqUired pnor to ISsuance of City Building Permit), If applicable o COPY OF STATE AND COUNTY STORMWATER SYSTEM TIE-IN PERMIT APPLICATIONS, If applicable )61 H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) LANDSCAPE PLAN All eXIsting and proposed structures, Names of abutllng streets Drainage end retention areas Includmg swales, side slopes and boltom elevabons, Dehnealion and dimenSIOns of all reqUired penmeter landscape buffers, Sight Vis!bllity tnangles, DelineatIon and dimenSIons of all parkmg areas Including landscaping Islands and curbmg, Proposed and reqUIred parking spaces, Exlstmg trees on-site and Immediately adjacent to the Site, by speCies, sIZe and locabons, IfIcludlng dnphne, location, Size, descrlpllon, Specifications and quantlbes of all exlsbng and proposed landscape matenals, Includmg botanical and common names, Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants Including mstrucltons, SOil miXes, backfilling, mulching and prolectlve measures, Intenor landscaping areas hatched andlor Shaded and labeled and mtenor landscape coverage, expressing In both square feet and percentage covered, Condlbons of a preVIous development approval (e g condlllons Imposed by the Community Development Board), Imgalton nOles l1G REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 'h X 11) (color rendellng If pOSSible), IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval), COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM apphcatlon, as applicable !J o ~ BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS. (Section 4-202 A.23) ReqUired In the evellt the application Includes a development where deSign standards are mlssue (e g Tounst and Downtown Dlstncts) or as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment PrOject or a Resldenlla! lnfill Project BUILDING ELEVATION DRA\iVlNGS - all Sides of all buddlngs mdudmg height dImensiOns, colors and matenals, REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four Sides of bUlldmg With colors and materials to scale (8 'Ai X 11) (black and white and color rendenng, If poSSible) as reqUired J SIGNAGE (Division 19 SIGNS I Section 3-1806) lAj~ ~t1f4'/A.~ V~'7~ t:t::. All EXISTING freestanding and attached &lgns, Provide photographs and dimensions (area, helQht, ete ), Indicate whether they Will be removed or to remain o Q All PROPOSED freestanding and attached srgns, Provide details mcludmg locallon, Size, height, colors, malenals and draWing o Comprehensive Sign Program appllcallon, as applicable (separate appllC8tton and fee reqUired) Reduced Slgnage proposal (8 'h X 11) (color), If submllllng ComprehefISJve Sign Program application Q Page 4 of 6 - FleXible Development Appllcatlon - City of CleafWater rmT~Y~~lX~ I.,r-:: ~' iUL~W: ~ 2C!!\ h.J\lI,JNI~J( . vEt \ _ __\111 r CLEf.:. , . K TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY' (Section 4-801 C) '( l.-E~~ Include as requrred if proposed development will degrade tho acceptable level of sel'Vlce for any roadway as adopled In the Comprehensrve Plan Tnp generation shall be based on the most recent edrbon ollt>e lnsbtule ofTransportabOIl Engrneer's Tnp General Manual Refer to SedJoll4-801 C of the CommulIIty Development Code for excepbons to !hIS reqUirement ,t:i~ '1.~~~::!: --fo tlAJ. ~~ ~ /hLe. ~ 3C 'f+1 ~v ~ /YYLi!. ~/ lL ~ _ {/Jj i J. .#U'lLU-uu-L ~ C)~ {)J-IC.o Wt ~"YL (j J~ 6 {c a:i..< OJ.<., L SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representabons made In Illls appllcallon are lfl.Je and accurate to the besl of my knowledgo and aulhorJZe City representabves to VlSrt ana Photograph the property descnbed In thiS appncatron ~ (jllAIVeA-O '" 1/~ ;O~~ MARILYN KUIPERS COMMISSION' D0059498 EXPIRE S sa> 23 2005 ilOI'.cEO neoo..G1 AD1/~ t<rN'Y STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Jwo~amj subscribed before.,me thiS --...::lJ day of \A , AD 20Q!.. to me and/or by , who IS personally known has produced Fl., '!lrU~ u ~ c. as I denllflca lion FI./ S3 "7 '77.- fpp l.11 ~ 0 'Ko~e.^-.f L fl I'\,t, Virginia Allen <. L 5B82 CF ",ct-4 ExpIres November 30, 2007 8l:rIOe<l TIC)' Flla1-/tIIU'a'lQo, Ire. ~~70'9 ~-\ nll~ C:~'ii.~- "I-~~--- - i U~\ JUN 1 7 2:0~ ! I ~EN~- .:VATfl f'J\110:G & DE\. Cl fY OF ('I r~ 5 of 6 - r.e:a:.e ~~Iopment Applicaboll - City of Clearwater , M. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: \I \ ~4 \ I-lI A f'f'A.~ ~ (Names of an property owners) That (I am1we are) the owner(s) and record lrtIe hoIder(s) of the follQWlflg desalbed property (address or generallocallon) fdR9 ~A'( e7"P~UA~ 2 That this property consllMes the property for whld1 a request for a (describe request) ~~ ~T\~~ A fb~\7E.&;.c.~\?noW oF ~u.e?"-~ ~ ~ ~e.\-r-H: ;tA.,(,AC..-;'i':e'l~ ~ r={....'(~,.- 3 That the undersigned (haslhave) appointed and (does/do) appoint as (hlsflhelr) agent(s) to execute any pe!JtJons or other documents necessary to alfecl such pebbon, 4 Thatttus affidaVit has been executed to Induce the Crty of Clearwater. ROllda to conSider and ad on the above descnbed property 5 thai srle VlSrts to the property are necessary by City representalrves In order to process thiS appllcabon and the owner authoflZes City repJesentabves to ViSit and photograph the property descnbed In thiS appllcaboll, 6 I That (Ifwe), the undersigned aulhonty hereby t:erIIfy that the foregomg IS true and d ~ STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS My CommISSion ExpIres fore me the urnlerslgned, all officer duly comrrnSSloned y , .;zoo 'I personally appeared poses and says that he/she fully understands !he contents of MARilYN KUIPERS CO/M'llSSlON , 00059"98 EXPIRES SU 23 2005 /oCII'O:C Tl'iROl.IGH WJ~ I'IOlARY 3/.rr day of n S who haVIng been first duly swom ~~7d . .J4-./ Notary p~ """ oc . .---- -\- -.-.--- ~ ~I~ I;: 'I \~I \r;, [D) t t. I '~~. -. .-' ~" - \\ 'j G~1I1 72Wt \j \ ~\ --' '-, __-- --;- OP >J.... \ ]'l. j r "-; I _l _"'I,'..."~,,.~ttJ'\.P\l' -"'- , " ~ ?a.ge 6 of 6 - Flexible Development AppllcatJon - City of Clearwater EXHIBIT A DESCRIPTION OF REQUESTS . ReductIon of minimum lot area from 10,000 s f. to 6,479 s.r. . ReductIOn of mInimUm lot width from 100 feet to 60 feet . Reduce front setback from 15 feet to 6 foot rmrumum . Reduce side setback from 10 feet to 0 mmimum . Reduce rear setback from 20 feet to 10 feet milllmUID --- .---;-r;:s , _ ~ -~ \\' I L:<\ \ , --rm=-~te 0'-' \ ( \ \ \ 'i \ =-'- 1 I~ "l k, ^ _~ _. ."..-- , I 'i\ .....:..-- > ~' , "} ___.~.. ~l; '~ nnl. I" II \,,\\ j\.n\ , 1 1'.;.:1"( j \ \\ ' \ ~ l ,.... \ uL, ------ - --- ~ ~~_~ I ~~ r.....~ :"'\1i~"".J f ___-....--- ,....' 1"'-' m__ ----~ - .-- f \ ~ \ i EXlDBIT B GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA RESPONSES 1 The proposed development of the land wIll be in harmony wIth the scale, bulk, coverage, denSity and character of adjacent propertIes in whIch If IS located Rather than being In harmony with the character of the eXlstmg older multI-farmly projects located adjacent to the SIte, the project wlll set a new standard for the neIghborhood, slll1llar to LaR1sa I The proposed project Will however mamtain the character of Clearwater Beach with the proposed Mediterranean architectural theme and small-scale condomInIUm development The project does not deviate from the pennitted uses m the TOlinst Zomng Dlstnct and represents a decrease In density from the existing 8-umt apartment complex to 4 condommmm umts The character of the project is an upscale condomInium development with upgraded architectural fimshes and textures 2 The proposed development WIll not hmder or dIscourage the approprzate development and use of adjacent land and bUildings or significantly Impazr the value thereof The proposed development is conSIstent with the eXIstmg surroundmg and proposed land uses The project Will be conSIstent With the re-development of LaRIsa I to the east, and set a positive example for the redevelopment of the adjacent properties to the north and south when appropriate. The value of the abutting propertIes will not be compromIsed, and will likely be enhanced by the development of the project 3 The proposed development w1l1 not adversely affect the health or safety or persons resldmg or worlang in the neIghborhood of the proposed use The reduction m denSIty from 8 eXlstmg apartment to 4 proposed condomImum umts would decrease the vehicular traffic along Bay Esplanade There are no proposed uses other than residential that Will have a detrunental effect on the health of persons residing or workmg m the neighborhood 4 The proposed development IS deSIgned to minImIze traffic congestIOn The proposed development is deSIgned to reduce the vehIcular traffic through the reductlon of Units from 8 apartments to 4 condomimums The required parkmg will be provided on-Site and mainly witlun an enclosed parkmg garage. 5 The proposed development IS consistent wlfh the commumty character of the Immedzate VICinIty of the parcel proposed for development The parcels nnmedlately to the n~and south are currently multI.famIly developments.=The"pip'celrto~.@ cbIitilms the approved LaRisa I multi-famIly ~~l\ t~ 11f, Ie 1 \'..J~~~' ,; \' u ....... ~~'J ~~ \ I ~~~UN 11 ~ _ \. "'; \ ~~-rl"'~ ........,-\ v~ -t' ~\~ .) I \ " {\Ill'}:: ~ ~ r'~\'; ~-_,2~1~1 EXL_ - J , , project Therefore the project IS consistent with the eXIsting and proposed uses, current zomng uses, and the future land use plan 6 The desIgn of the proposed development mmimIzes adverse effects, mcludmg vlsual, acoustlc and olfactory and hours of operatJOn Impacts The project mimmizes the acoustic and olfactory rmpacts of the project by constructmg a 6~ foot high fence along the south property lme. Landscape buffers, a parkmg garage and the fence along the north, and south property hnes mimmlze the visual impacts. The project only contams 4 reSidential uruts, which wIll not include any busmesses 11-;1:W'(~-'1i'IT\ITT~ I ,~~, n I~"= 'r'~':.;! ,.....,.-- 'II , 1, I ~ ~' I ~ JU:: 1 1 2~~4 I J' ~ 1_* 1.~'1 -. . ! ~ ......./\~1~1\ t:~, j..... ~ r~ _~___ Cl.~__~ _~ ... j i i' EXHIBIT C ATTACHED DWELLINGS FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA 1. Lot area and width' The reduction In lot area wIll not result In a buildIng which is out of scale with eXIst] ng bUIldmgs In the nnmedlate VIClll1ty of the parcel proposed for development. The proposed project IS a four-story condomimum project consisting of only one umt per floor The buIlding footpnnt fits Wlthlll the existmg 6,479 SF lot and stIll provides the reqUIred open space and parking spaces. The project IS actually a reduction In density from the existmg 8-umt apartment bUIldmg to a 4-umt condomImum proJect, thereby reducing the scale of the development on the SIte. 2 Location' The use of the parcel proposed for development wIll not mvolve direct access to an arterial street. The one dnveway access will connect to Bay Esplanade which is a local road The project IS also a reduction in unit density and vehicular tnps. 3 Setbacks F~-8-~ ;'--r- -,0") [! l )(Wl l~ffi1 , :--, g ~\7(11 \ C"") "1. <=, . ~ - II ('01 II-::-! r- I I", ~~ : iii- ~11::.l i i ,-f ~ I': 1 l 1___,_', I -= <_ - I ,,~ I ' ;- -;:--2___ a The reduction In front setback contnbutes to a more actlve and dynamzc street life The existing neighborhood, which IS in the tourist dlstnct, is more residentIal in nature without an active and dynamIc street hfe The project IS deSigned to mamtam the eXlstmg flavor and senne lIfestyle of the surrounding developments. b The reductIOn infront setback results in an zmproved Mte plan or improved deslgn and appearance The reduction In the front setback IS for pavement only. The proposed buildmg meets the front setback requirements. The pavement encroachment provides an access drive and Sidewalk to the parlang garage and pedestnan access. c The reductIOn m SIde and rear setback does not prevent access to the rear of any budding by emergency vehicles The minimum slde-bUIldmg setback IS 0 0 to a proposed wooden boardwalk providing access to the rear of the buildmg. The rear of the buIlding will also be accessible through the first floor parkIng garage d The reductIOn m Side and rear setback results in an Improved slle plan, more effiCient parlang or Improved deSign and appearance The proposed side setback reduction allows for a 24- foot wide driveway and 19 foot deep parking stalls within the parking garage. The project actually lDcreases the setbacks from the current apartment development I , and reduces the umt density The effects of the reductions will be mimmized by the construction of a 6-foot high fence along the north property hne and 8-foot wide landscape buffer along the south property hne 4 The desIgn of all bwldmgs complies with the Tourist DIstrIct desIgn gwdelmes m DlvislOn 5 of ArtIcle 3 The elevations of the proposed bmldmg are enclosed 10 thIS package showmg all four sides of the building architecture. The colors of the building are also represented in the reduced color building elevations. ~~~--~ 't= -::::) ~ ' ,nil.} . -- ---I~ff;"1i '1.-'\ __ _' 't- } C"") , c:' I () 'l c,.~ 11 rul 'J ~ I - I .. " l :) \. I ~.., T r\ ~: , - 1 ~ I ___ ........,_ ~ ~ r11~~""'--. ... -.. - -~ - - , , --- 727-784-0098 ~O-O+. 2 " f~ 115 ~ F. !If 3LPJ<f.R. fl.m{ [f 0lRT PI.tt.u..AS COJTY, Fl.lRlOO 7CZ":m57 11~2t.2002 OO:46.fB V!tJ 51 IJ8)-~S UrP6HII~ B oro:Jl)'} m:t12436869 E(:l2362 SPli:l713 EPG:~~3 RmiRDlf(; 001 PtffS 1 $6.00 s&.OC SE.OO $.00 roT At: rHCI( 00 TOJ!fI.ID. 1)11 ) ()MI' iN ~ r.mrrv t!..ER< . } Mar 31 04 Dl:57p RadcllF~e Development " , PREP AM:D OV, BUT TI rLE !XOT E>....r!INED BY, RECORDlNC REQUESTED BY AN WHE"-I R,E('O:U;ED MAJL DEED TO , , ~ ( .A..nn Stu:.w. Attorney at Law 144~ Cow1 Srreei, Su'te 200 Oearwate" Florida 33;56 -'- 4' 'CRfJ~ MAIL TA.,"( STATEMENTS TO , " , - . ~ --- Ms VLfgmia B Fraohs -,.- ---.::: 665 Ball ESF'anace .. '\'~--~ Clearwater Beac".. FlorIda 33"1 ~. I SPArE ABOVE THIS LINE, RE<:t'J)vf:n IY'lR RFrnRf'FR S (ISf' 02-436869 NDU-21-20D2 8 PINELLRS CO 8~ 12362 PG QUIT CLAnJ DEED HUm UllflOlll!lllllil 11I1 mmlll1lllUJ 4SI\n 17=3 T.te l.!\derslg.'lCd Grenlor declares thai tIa J.Sfer tax IS NO'\! E 1b1s co:.. eyano: tJarnfen. the Grantors' 'nterest IfI,Q her revocable 11 vIDg t:'.1<;( l<()r No C\'msldefallOn, Co1ange in \'f!Stlll.g only (ran'or, YuglJl.lll B Franks whose addrcs~ IS 669 Bay Esplanade, Ckarwater Beaen. FI~nda grants 10, VugllUa B F'aMs, Trustee, whose adcress IS me same as grantor, 01 h~1 &UCCesSOf It trus~ under The V rglDJOI B Flanks Trust, Dalec ~tJt"P.lff.. \1.- 20Q2, alld an)' arr.endmelll$ Ib~relO, ibe followurg reul property IOClled lfl the Cowity of PINEL LAS , Stale of Flcmda, and cl:$cnbed a~ fOllows Lot 8, Block n, M~ndalay StlbcIV!SIOIl Urut 5, accordmg to :he '1l2p or olllt thereof a sr<<orded m Pial Book 20. Page 27, PublIC records or PI)! EU..A~ CCWlty, Flu'lda AC~OWlt cr Perr",anenl Parcel 1\0 or Folio No 05:29115 54756'077 0080 NOT!? TO PROPERTY APPRAISER The Granter confirms t}at uncet f~ term.;. 0 i th.; Trosl, referred 10 abo"e, the Grantor has not less than a benefic1almleresl for I fe and IS entitled 10 a 1l0l"\cSlead lax cJf.:mptlOTl pUlsuart ,0 Ihe pro\l's.:ons of f JonL.i1 Sla'1le 1960<1](2) Rxecuu::d OD \\\r.,\U\; , at PfNEL....AS COWl'y, FlonJa 1,.11ne...S ~~w~ \?"'~\ ~~~- ~IW'~~ ~+PJ.~X\O-- ~CJ2 , ~, '~~J~ Vl~B Franks PRJl\'i N<\ME \\t1me ~s PRINT NA\1E STATE OF FLORIDA ) )~ COUNTY OF P1NELl.6,S ) On ~ (\..~ before me O..,"~ S~,..,Jj. , , }..otary Publzc, personall~ app<earec.. Yrrg'llld B I<1an1s, who IS Jlersorlillly knoTl.lI to me O~ \' ,0 ha.. pro:h.ced Dr,lWI. \-\~t.r......... as Idenlrficabon ~l1d ackrowlcdged to me that she exeotd th~ )ame In her author,zc-1 CapaCity, and that bt her SlgrultU:COI'l the lns!rJIIJCnt the person or theenuty upon beh.11fofv.rucn lhe ;XfSO& ~ted. executed the lr)tn1l"u:r>1 \Iy ITNESS r:l)' band and offidal seal i ~- -, -.. ~-n-~~ \'A f(r--~'~ ' UQoJ.rJ - I '----:=-~~~~-} : NOTARY PIJBL1C -11"5''-'" \: <: 1":-""\ 7. \,...} I ..qo -..1.- I I---'_~ ~ ~:! I ~-~ ~ t, ~ ~ ~ '::~ (',J ! j M~ COl"1ffilSS!OIl El.plres ~. I , I ..::..: , )l I- I __~ I => I ~ 'Jl' ! <--1._ __ 1~ ---..Y,. - j II_.........J ___~J - II n ~ ;:;- ~ 1i> @" 0- o l :E ;;0 (1) .0 ~ @ 0- ~ ~ 3' (1) ~ <: o E" 3 (1) ..", Q', o ::';l i'-.l Q', '0 '0 Q', n c::: .;, -:l V'l o o ..", -...l o o o i'-.l ..", Ul o o ....., 0-. -..J V'l o ....., 0-. -...l Ul o i'-.l 0-. '0 '0 0-. ..", Q', o . v.> Ul <:) ['11 iii < !:;. (3 ;:l IV <:) <:) o [Jl> ..., '"I1(1) ~ > < [JlClll '"I1> @ ~ n<: C2.. .;,~ -:l(1) o <:) <:) n?: en ~~ n~ e , <: ~2.. o l :E - ~......~ -" -.... "------ - I=::::::; ~ ' _ (__J~l ~~ 1- --l~:-J '-- I _ \1 c: . " :;~ i ~1 - ~~ _: ~ ~~j I ~~ l ~ . ~~ ,'-"7k im~ l:n~,~ ~ I' '~I, J I f/ \.. l..._ , ' l---=~_~- ----] [Jl 5- (1) [Jl a '0 (1) '" ;:l n ..., (1) 3 l'l g 1:0 o ~ o 3 ..", <..J Ul ::';l V'l !l -Ii' > ..., l'l ~ @ -:l o tl:l J::,. -.l 0-. o [Jl "T] . --l o '0 o ....., 1:0 ~ ;:>;" [!l Ul <:) !l ;:0 c: :::l o ::::j ,-..,. ::; '-' <:) Ul 2 1:0 ~ '" 5 )> @ ~ 0-. ..", -.l 1.0 [Jl '"I1 ""0 ..., .g (1) ~ l ~ ;:0 v; ~ = L'~ = = ::c_ - fl> ~ .. -.0 - c: ~ - ~ -i ~ = a fl> = - o ~ @" ~ ~ IV ~..", IV o o ..", · "KerTH 'LA\. ,C &> ASSOC ,!\TES, INC. - "'" ~,. I - ... - <- ~-.. f..i" -<" ~"< <i' ~ '" ) ~"t........... -... "'-x- _... "" ....... .;.. -" ... ~...., ~ _ _'-'-"--~'" -'-'t ~ J" "" ~-...'" ~ --..-.. ""--,............... ~ _\-- "'- ~..-- ~=:;,... .... -,.,.-"........... t;" ,)..,.- _ ~': -,' ,CIVU:: E:N4INEE:RI~G ~',~"', '::,>,~' , " LAt:.JI)SGAE\~;I\RC^HITE:CTtJRh:~"_~' ~ > : r,' ,_, PLAN NING, ' ~ ;""':-.-; - " :l' '" " ~ ~ ... ~ \..<. ">: jJ';:,-"~ ~ ~ < ".... '" -""" " :"";,.-"" j'~ ~~ 1 }... ~- ...,....~ r r v., / "'.t ::; l j- _ ?-., '" ~,,\~ ~ l ~~;\ ., .., .,... " , ,- ~~~~--'-~^- ~'"!_~~ ~',"- ,~"' ,. - - ' " #~: ~f > ~ ~"f ~ {;y ~;~$ 1 1:~~ r",~~~:t;t2" ?;ji,,~,~}j~~ :~~:~ p'rf>'~~~~~~ ,;,~ ;~u;r:~;:~k1i~H Jn0""~ ~:~ ~N:Y~~~~ ~~~1 to-".,...:;..- ~ N -<.<'-N~".,.." f>"-;. ./><....i)t~"'!!,f; ... i~~ q "'I} -\ ~{\"';"O"'';> "V l \:><:i 'fR'< ....."'-""'" -.E ,?""'W~"" ~'"' ~ ijV<' ~ <..~ f'; {,., '-' r rI01 PHILIPPE EARKWAY~,,;j;~' ~ ;r~',~ft:;;:"1h'~;,' '";.', )":" ,',~<",\,L'~ -&, D' $!~+1'" '" . "\:!' f,?\j'r-~,Jll :;;t;A:,'~,,~",", PInONE 7277939888 - ," ~ ~ ~}-... ~ <., ""~;r:~(1~ L;;"~ tv~';~''''' %.'( \ if "" ~;:o-~,-, ~.x rl nW ......f~ j '~~fF" V't.-~...)-;r<"\ ...~ ,.,'" "~ -; I ~A ->z surrE~205 ~ :ro->i~~J~Z:' ~~ "t~ ~~ ;l;t ";:i< '>~1?;;:!;~ t,:;(4 t~ r f~ s ~ ~~ f \~~~;~; ~~i~;:r }J;~$. ~ ~ t~~ ~j#::Zf~~H~~,FAX,,~ ~727 793 9855 -. .l '"""""t ~ "'''' ~'"' ,,=- .,.,. ? <f' l"" h ~ ~ y<<""" 4., "" ~ '"' '^ ,. .., ~ t. \. ~; '=""t:t'4 f'J......... >vh '\. ! ~~ r ~ ~ l ~"''' '< l J ;:.; "; ,SAFET,y MARB0R;:FLQRlj})1\ 34695';,,~ "~, 't '7,:"< F.,,1~,~ .' 1 ~'4, tt>.:w~;f.lV1A:IL KEITHZ>\YAC@AOLCOM '. ~ ~, ---~I~\> It"~ ;;; J t>~,>, ->( "'~.1'<<' '" .;~~( ~~~ (j,"""+.=:""'......? ,.j,~ ~.....? .....t....lJ >~-..f /t l'""' -4 '* I '\ ~~-...i.::.+~":"'''--.... ~""'s.....~;"t ' ~~~ j~" f::;:!;.f,,~ :f::'t r'r<~::<fl'? ~ ..> ~..~ ~ '^~~;-:..~! ..<;~..."l, ....~~ March 24, 2004 Mr Bennett Elbo City of Clearwater Public Works Administration 100 S Myrtle Ave Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: LARISA II Dear Mr Elbo This letter IS written In support of the proposed LaRlsa II condommlum project regarding traffic Impacts The proposed project tncludes four condomInium units located on a 0 15 acre site at 669 Bay Esplanade The project also Includes SIX on- site parking spaces, four located within a covered parkIng garage, and two open aIr spaces This project will also Include the demolItion and removal of the eXlstmg 8 umt apartment complex located on the same Site Based on the density reduction from the current 8-umt apartment complex to the proposed 4 Unit condominium proJect, the vehicular tnp generation Will be reduced and the level of service of Bay Esplanade WIll not be adversely Impacted ll~~"'"'";r \~-- ~~~- r,;\ g .~\ -: \ 1 ,-- t r- I \ \;;~; -- \ -~1 ~ L"' : ) \ \ ,'::.. 1 :;'''"l \~..: 'f' ~ \~_G , ". l '" l - --;::,'~~T ~ ; ~;- ;;:~~;..--~ ~~ . ! PERMITS 310.04 Keith Zayac & Associates~ Inc. CIVil Englneenng, Landscape Architecture, Planning !OI PhilIppe Pkwy, Ste 205 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 (727) 793.9888 Phone (727) 793-9855 Fax kelthzavac@aol com Mr. Richard AIt, P.E. Southwest Florida Water Management District 7601 Highway 301 North Tampa, Florida 33637 - 6759 (813) 985 7481 June 17,2004 Re: La Risa II (Clearwater, Florida) SWFWMD Exemption No. CT 126637 KZA Project No. 310-04 Dear Me Alt Please find enclosed three (3) sets of revised plans for the referenced proJect, The followmg table summanzes the existing and proposed (revised) conditions Total Impervious Area ff Vehicular Use Area Total Site Area f EXISTING CONDITIONS 5,978 19 623 18 6,479.00 PROPOSED CONDITIONS 4,896.90 532.23 6,4 79 00 Additionally, your comments are addressed as follows 1 Please provide gradmg plans to provide reasonable assurance that proposed project Will not Impact the adjacent Outstandmg Flonda Waters and AquatiC Preserve Response The gradmg plan has been provIded (see sheet 6) 2 Plans show the seawall to be razed Please provide details on thiS proposed actiVity to provide reasonable assurance that wetlands will not be Impacted Response' The contractor Will reconstruct the top of the seawall to elevation 5 00 and exercise extreme cautIOn to prevent Impact to wetlands (see sheet 6) , 3 Please proVide erosion control measures to proVide reasonable assurance that the adjacent water resources win not be Impacted I \LaRIsa _J1\Documents\RlchardAlt[SWFWMD]ExemptlonReqllesl: _032404 doc Response ErOSIOn control measures have been proVided (see sheets -:.~:,d ~l~--Wru--l \fi) \1' I t, ~.lS., , IU\r~ 12004 \ . 1_____-. . --- _' ~1}\l'.N1NG' ' CITl' (), J ':J1 ---' J t .. PERMITS 310-04 Thank you for your assistance with this project Please contact us Ifthere are any questIOns I \LaRlsll_II\Documents\RlchardAlt[SWFWMDjExempuoIIRequest_ 032404 doc ~ru- ~ ~~;-\~~\r\lJJ.\(r-l< \ ~=--- ""==. ....". - -~=- \ \ I'J'G JUU 1 7 2nO~ \ 1~_----- I -..J"NNltK.J 'lo ~_, ' L r:l.~~- ---,-~ -. ~-- ;~ Ii i ~W !i i :{~ if Z l~ 'I :- Hil .; 1 !'!lll ;: n i -HI ; i ,;<I i .' !j!!: Ilil ,::~. ~ " , " ' I r" i H I; 1 l~:;' ;." IIi i Ii ;1 f 'jU 11 Hi i f I < Il.l \" 'r I -< H! j f:f I ~ If; I I I, ~ II ~ I i it t '~ ,.f · I " ! i I': Ji~ i ~ ~f : !: "1' h' J. : f ,1.;-! I l\:' ,11 ! i ,I. , i t ~ ., ~ l i; t 1 !' i I i Ii f l ;t,~!l. Wi ; ~ ,j ,.! I [ l' 1 ~ ! fill . 1 a 1 , ~j.! I' .; ! j i .,J \' 1 1, !. ,. f! - 1,' r~ r J -. RA >..I' 11111: \Y \C -- VClJl"I'r DE:vElDP~ENT L.!..C <M.c.~ - ~A'X:>l.YIAT~_? II\.'C 2424 CURLEW ROA[} -;:'!fr.IfInUI:t.o'Iib.li1It-l.'l ~ PAUl HAHIlOR ~"3.683 ';:;-'::';':""'" - ~ F"\.'{ ~"',II'ICI; ~~,j.,IJ:lth..EIIl:lZ.!.('\I.-i:(!IoII , 'r ----~ ' I ).) "'-... l~...... ~~-- .~~~c_~~_~~~Jl~ II i _",J-ffi I: :i~- .J .illJillI \\ \- \ -+ \ \ \.....l , ,- '\--- \ \ ---" ,.... "- , "'- / "------ _ . .., ,'<l'ol. , ~~s.,.r- ~~?P _ \ ~ r , \" :)-'" \ ," CO \" ..:.....\ ," " \ ,/ \ .,; \ \ " ~L;., \ >- \~~\\rr" [t.~~... L "J'1l'r'F,;. , .', \"1....t I c , , \ -"~~ ;: ~- - \' ~ ~ t ~, ....J ' ~...,. {I " 1\ ....'" - \ J.;t~ \ ~....~ \ "'7",:' \ .-, , -.. \' , .' / ~ _____ J' -/" __ .:.-...1 ",,- / q, ;. ,- - , .- -~ ., " \ \ \ "l ,.. ~ i- . ~ .. iij ., '" a " ;0 '" 'il .~ ~ 1;; ~. 8 ~~ - ..--- /,; . \ , ' ~ ..' '1 ". " .co --:;-- ,t ~ ' ,- 1111I1; il!!jill~;;iiii I! IIi! ~(I!i; ~ u~ I I" J;j ~I~ii! ~ ~! ~1~Hr 1 ., - _~.I ~~ ,~~~t~ .ci ~ ~1t~~ ~~ i g :. ~ . ~ :::: it: - .. jij ~ j;: ~ :;;:.-::: ;:j, =.;:; ., 1" i ~ f! ; t ;: ~l: I"l: j[:J . I'. j · , 'I 'I l 1 -1 .l ,i 'H- ... 3"_ .! 3 }: Z s'ii ""'11: 3. ~,l ,~ ~ I ! , ;:I;~ " i j. 'j III ,l'~ i ; I !! ; ! ~ll; ,f · ~; ~l ~I f~I! I _ ~ I " ~ 1 i!. l[ , t! $1 !~ .' l, ii' l I I . ~.'i a ! ., :. ~~ d'l 'fl 'Il.;I I. .. ill.tf.! '!i [ I"':!;: h '3q.!ii ',' ~.l'-':;:" ,..;"'~ . '1' l I i I ,1'1 'it I' ~ '. " 'Jii I' ., - " h j , " l' j " , j' I! ' $ :1 , .-' I F 11 '. l "! I - I , 'f ~ : ~ ! ii 'I ~jll I ' fl' - i I 0" . j f J!'1i ii' j -, · q ~ I'? :.1" J 'I i d. f it t H !t.l I I:! ~ ~! t i If; H~t~ 1 l a . I' '" ! - : - .,., . t' ' l., j 'iI' I j : I ~i i . l' · i t i'l' f r ~. ! I ~ Iii II' ! ~ i tit ! ~; ~ ~ I ili~ '! l ~ j. ~ ~ ~ i" r 1 11'1f ! l ~ i ,il I I i - ! f I '& ' 5,j::!: ~ z (- f if'!! l if; ~'4.1 ,.j h t i. · ! ~ 01 ~ ~ \l ~ " 0 ~ ~ " 0 K ""'=.\,(('"I_J ~ n ...s.... l.i\ RlSA II ..........- ""'~ CLEARWATFR ~LORI[)A LAN U SL APF PLAN ~~~~_...... ~ i: ;; Ii i I 1:1' :! ii I .~ hl!l GI'i' ~ ~ ~!IU :d:h ~ I : I ,; , -I' .... , . \ \ \ ~ " \ 1, \ \ ! " \ .....'.,.'M"t.. . . r , ~ .. I \ - < .' rl \ .' . \ ~ " , , ~! , ....-- . .....--' ---- ~ ~~':J. L \ nOf -- " \ ~-It ~ ./ '~\\, ':i\TI~-0~}\ ~ \~J ~~'J,Y.-- ~ ~~~ Ij-,.~_..f~~..,;: \Il~ ~1_- I :.'Jj $<:-'" p. $ 5~ _ / \ ~ ~ \ 1-- \ ' \ I ' \ \ (\l ~ ~\ -+~ UJ f- ~~ 1'" "'..............-\ l ,- ~ --- /. ~ . ~; \ ""'--q \ ,.. :;. \ ~~i J_~ ...-;;, \ ~~;; \ . T , , \ , .' ' /\ '" 1~:C: fl... , " ~. t.';."'( -.. ..; ~ L. ~ < " ":..~.." +) -:;. , , "'l-P, oJ.... . . , -~ Ib' tb 1:~':"'_, r" \ '\< ' v:\ \ \ '":..~<"" -:." -~ -rJ,;:" 15' "'" - " .-tr- A'J. ':. 0:;' , -..,r... " '" "'. \ \ ( , , ,"' ~.,..:; \-,"l , \ . , - 'f -;:..\.,U ~ ' " ).. /' - - I '1 ..... --;r: ---- .J 4, ~,; ~".1!~J'~l"O'J[o<. ~~ .:w ~ ~""I)...'7~r;I ~ ~ . '''..\ ' , ' I II "i ~ f '\ , -~ , \ I g r~ ,,-~~- ,ill ~ ~~~ \ \ \', i \\\ ~ \ \ ~' \ \ ,~\ "- ,-- t \- ~ii~i~~ii~~ ~~n~~;n~;~f; ,; > i~~~~~~ ~~~6~r,;~~~~' 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~... ~ ~ ~ 3~ ~r;;I ~ ~ ~} l..... ~ ~ ~ ~~~~gh~ is!~HH~~j,g~~ ~ ~~ I'" ~ ~; ~:; ~~ ~~~ ~~ ~ .. ~ ~ S~~~" ~~ z.~ ~ 2 < ~r ~" ~~. ~~ ~ ~~~~;l:;.",:~~ ~~:~~~!~ ~d '".... tIII:g.... ~ ~ "'" II:: l'<l..... ~:iIl. ::QI'" ~....,.:!, 'i:; :o:i;;;8~g ~ ~c~~~ ~Q d;3! 'Ill t:l ":::!ll "'l'llt '"4 ~ lit i '"":! ~ Eo row Y 11 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i~ to ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ iI~ ~~, ~ j; j; ~ ~ ~ ~ _~ ~o ~ '" CII ~ m ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~_~.12 < ~ ~ ~~ ~~g ~ ~t'o::~:; ~ ~ :3 g~ a~~ ~ ~ :: ~ ~:.. ; ~ ~ ~~ ~ .5. ~ ~ ~ ~ -ei;! ~~ I ~ 55 ~ .c ~o - ~ ~c ~ 1I~ ~ ~~ ~ ~Q ~ h ~ ~! c ,.. lJIo 1I;l:;; ~ ~j' ; ~ ~ ~ ~% \' ~" 8 mj ~ ;!; ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ H ~ ~ 8~ m ~ ~~ R ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ '! 0.., ~ ~; ~ g-1 :n; l')- 1::.B "" ~ ~~ g ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ i~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 5 i : ~ ~ )l ~ 1 ~ " ~ " X ! h?1 ~ g :J.o~ 1 ~~: ~~~~~ ~~~ 8 ~ '::,. lit"" ~.........:tN . I g ~ ! ,.- ~ . <: ~~ r:r~i~ 1 ~ x '" ~;~ m~~~~ g ~ ~ l'! " ~881 ~ ~ ~ ;;~?i~ i " ~ ~ a ~ ~ -. ~ ~ ~ ~.. l ~;" ~ ~ ~ z z .." i ~ ~~ ~ ~ c .. ~ iil 0: ~ x ~ 1< 11 ~ ~ ;~'~~;;i ~~ ~~ @ ~~ ~~~ - ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~;; i~ ., 1.,\ RISA 11 "E.lTI1/IW/\C ~ /\S'5OCIr\TE... S-INC Rr!L[X"IJPF'E m:vtw1-'MENT [...J r ~1M1t:~:~~ ~N?~ ~ ~4~4 Ct.JRl...Evr ~<'\~D ~I.II~M ....t:D'i_ - ~ O~l \~ ~f 'DQf'L'C IJI.'N!"'~ - " ~ ~ P ." $ ~ nil .... T ~ ~ CL8ARWA1, R FLORIOA ~ . , if ,,I, ". \ \ Reynolds, Mike From Sent To. Cc. Subject. Reynolds, MIke Thursday, July 29, 2004 11 01 AM 'kelth @ kelthzayac com' Tarapanl, Cyndl, Fierce, lisa, Gerlock, Chip, 'troYP@Jpflrm com', 'ehDoper1 @aol com' FLD2004-03018, 669 Say Esplanade, La Rlsa II Kerth, I am sendmg this e-maIl as a follow-up to our telephone dIScussion last week As we discussed, 15 caples of all La R Isa 2 SIte plan submIttal matenals will be delivered on Aug ust 2, 2004, Monday to meet the August 17, 2004 CDS meeting schedule August 2 IS the submittal date If the proposal IS the same as what was presented to the CDS meeting on July 20,2004 (Please submit your plan matenals caples by 12 noon) If the site plan IS redesigned, a later CDS meeting date will need to be scheduled In order to allow for public notice and staff revIew Please contact me wIth any questions Mike Reynolds, AICP, Senior Planner CIty Df Clearwater - 727-562-4836 mike revnolds@mvclearwatercom ~-- ~ ~ --~Q~----:-(;;.--r~-'<'- (2e. ---;- -- 1 . - _ _ _,_ C <::> 1L~_e':::'_lL1 d_...._.^""-l ~l '^ ........ . - -- -- - e~~1--lA<~~ -4 ~ --- -p}-It-+-__..-J3$ C:t""~( (!'\~ f{.J\"-fc--G~Loj:_uDc,\^'~T. - --- ~ ? 1 7--- - - -- - ------ ---- ----- - I "" ~ {r ~-("'fI1~-f:--i:'<'"- :b-.t.. "-- i\-""" >...~L_.~f..fu ""'- _ -r-<C(.Jh---~~(2/l--'-~ C-- __~_~ 0 ~ V --- -- --e~<>"-_~___,,,,-,-~ CO.t" Y .. (.$.A.~-"'-f: ) [1'-':> <1\cl "-=-f-\-~-I:: - --- ..., uJ (:2-(.0 "A.:e_p~"'~(=t@ __..( e.. ~--- <.:> -f -e./"L= 'T-6 ~ , ----- - ------- '? 1 ~ ~- Rice. Scott From Sent To Cc Subject Rice, Scott Thursday, June 24,2004 11 56 AM Reynolds, Mike Melone, Donald FLD2004-03018 - 669 Bay Esplanade Mike Two of the Engmeermg conditions on this application have not been met 1) The fire service pipeline to the proposed stand pipe cannot be mstalled on a restncted Ime 6/24/04 - NOT MET - THIS FIRE SERVICE LINE IS RESTRICTED BY A DDCV 2) SEE SHEET 7 OF 10, THE FIRE SERVICE PIPELINE IS TO BE INSTALLED BY THE CONTRACTOR THE TAPPING SLEEVENALVE AND BACKFLOW PREVENTOR/METER WILL BE INSTALLED BY THE CITY AT THE APPLICANTS EXPENSE The two above Items could be handled as conditions, but It would be better If they were resolved pnor to dlstnbutlon of the plans to the COB One condition that should be mcluded m your staff report IS Prior to bUlldmg permit, provide a copy of a SWFWMD permit or letter of exemptJon D. Scott Rice Land Deve/~ Engr~ Manager 727-562-4781 scott.rice@MyC/earwater.com ~ 1 ". /' - Ll.. I"~ '0 _ ~ I _ _ o ~1I1~ ~II~~ _ _I~I ~ 1 - ';: I - '" " >'~ (;\; earwater : II""'::: II I'" o FAX COVER MEMO TO: CITY OF CLEARW A TER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE., 2nd Floor CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 f -i 1~.J1 k.r 11)< 7 f1- f?rJ- FAX: Phone: - J;"ROM: /l1/ ~ ~ ~ {IJ Phone: a-z L -'II' J' ( I' ---1'2- -- 0'1 SUBJECT: ~ 200 'f-- OJ 0 ( ;. DATE: MESSAGE: r})J.L tl~ (~ ;7fruvT-"~ NUMBER OF PAGES(JNCLUDING THIS PAGE) ? CDB Meetmg Date Case Number Agenda Item Applicant Address August 17.2004 FLD2004-030 18 El RadclIffe Development Company, LLC 669 Bay Esplanade ORIGINAL CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: flexIble Development approval to pernut attached dwellIngs wIth (1) a reductIOn of the rmmmum lot area from 10,000 square feet to 6,479 square feet, (2) a reductIOn of rrummum lot Width from 100 feet to 60 feet, (3) a reductIOn of the front setback from 15 feet to SIX feet (to pavement), (4) a reductIOn of the Side (south) setback from 10 feet to zero feet to wooden walkway, (5) a reductlOn of the Side (north) setback from 10 feet to eIght feet (to bUlldmg), (6) a reductIOn of the rear setback from 20 feet to 10 feet (to deck), and (7) a bUlldmg heIght mcrease from 35 feet to 51 83 feet from FEMA to rmdpomt of the roof under the prOVISIOns of SectIOn 2- 803 B EXISTING ZONING! LAND USE: Tounst (T) DIStnct, Resort FacIlIties High (RFH) Category PROPERTY SIZE: o 148 acres, 6,479 square feet PROPERTY USE: Current Use. Apartments (8 umts) Proposed Use Multi-family reSidential (4 umts) ADJACENT ZONING! LAND USES: North West Tounst Dlstnct (T), Overnight accommodatIOns Tounst Dlstnct (T), Overnight accommodatIOns and attdched dwelhngs Clem water Harbor and Tounst Dlstnct (T), Clearwater Harbor Tounst Dlstnct (T), Attached dwellIngs Edst South CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY: Scemc north-south beach comdor, overnIght lodgmg, multI-famIly resIdential, and commerCial Staff Report - Commumty Development Board - August ] 7, 2004 - Case FLD2004-030 18 - Page 1 UPDA TE: ThIs case was contmued from the July 20, 2004 Commumty Development Board meetmg after a lengthy diSCUSSIOn A motIOn to approve the case faded by a vote of 2-3 and the case was automatically contmued The staff report and submIttal remaIn unchanged ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: This 0 148-acre sIte is located on the east sIde of Bay Esplanade, approximately 300 feet south of Somerset Street Overmght accommodatIOns and attached dwellmgs dorrunate the lTIUnedIate vlcmIty to the west, south, and north By Code, the allowable density on thiS sIte IS five hotel umts or four dwelhng umts. The site contaIns an eXIstmg, smgle-story, eIght.umt apartment bmldmg, wIth back out parkIng on Bay Esplanade There IS an eXIstmg deck on the east side of the site and an eXlstmg walkway from the front of the SIte to the rear along the south property hne The eXlstmg bUIldmg and ItS parkIng area fit tIghtly onto the SIte There IS lImIted landscapmg There IS one eXIstmg dock, located at the east sIde of the SIte, IS proposed to remam by thiS redevelopment request The site IS located wIthm the specIal area redevelopment plan, Beach by DeSign, as part of the "Old Honda" DIstnct ThIS area has been deSIgnated for multI-farmly townhomes and condorrumums of low to rrudnse. The lOnnedlate vIcImty IS almost entirely composed of attached dwellIngs and small motels BuIldmg styles generally resemble architecture from the 1950's and appear to have been progreSSively expanded. Bay Esplanade, m thIS general VICInIty, IS a local street with no Sidewalks where many Sites rely on the pubhc nght-of-way to accommodate perpendIcular, back-out parkmg Generally, the streetscape IS m need of redevelopment to Improve parkmg, pedestnan access, and Its aesthetIC appearance Beach by DeSign recognIzes SIte constramts of parcels m the neIghborhood and difficultIes of redevelopment Proposal: The proposal IS to completely raze the eXlstmg apartments and construct four attached dwellmgs ("La Rlsa II") The applIcatIon IS seekmg approval of the use, lot size and WIdth reductIOns, setback reductIOns, plus an mcrease m heIght The proposal shows SIX on.slte parkIng spaces at ground level The bUIldmg IS proposed to be four stones above parkmg and reach to 51 83 feet from a FEMA butldmg hne to roof Illldpomt ThiS site IS located WIthIn a flood zone (Zone AE) WIth an elevatIon of 11 feet The bUIldIng elevatIOns show four stones WIth a rooftop terrace over parkmg There IS an elevator overrun tower extendmg over the roof terrace The deSIgn of the bmldmg Includes arched stylmg WIth some of the doorways and wmdows Large wmdows are show on the east elevation, WIth VIews of Clearwater Harbor The plans show the bmldmgs to have a beIge color stucco fmIsh with a red-brown color roof Wmdows are proposed to have alurnmum frammg WIth a precast stone look tnm The roof IS shown to have a clay tile ITllSSlOn shape Wrought Iron raIlmgs WIll be attached to walkways and platforms outSide the bmldmg on five levels The north and west elevatIOns show a decoratlve archItectural medallion on the north and west SIdes of the elevator tower Extenor staIrs are shown on the north elevatIOn, from the ground level to the roof Wmdows and doors proposed on the north and south elevatIOns do not meet Bmldmg Code The setbacks as proposed llImt the use of wmdows and doors to 10 percent of the bUlldmg fagade StaIf Report - Commumty Development BOMd - August 17, 2004 - Case FLD2004-030 18 - Page 2 Vehicular and pedestnan safety would be Improved, as there wIll no longer be any back out parkIng onto Bay Esplanade A wooden walkway IS proposed along the south sIde of the property for access to the rear deck and dock Five cabanas and a rest room are shown on the sIte plan at the rear of the SIte The deck and dock amemty IS proposed to be shared WIth residents of a residentIal development across the street to the west, (La Rlsa I) Trash collectIOn IS proposed to be made from a sohd waste dumpster located InSIde the bUIldIng at the front (west side) of the SIte The dumpster IS to be rolled out by complex mamtenance to a stagmg area WhIle there IS a landscape plan, the proposed setbacks reduce the opportumty for green space A sIx-foot high opaque fence IS proposed along the south sIde of the property PrelIm10ary stormwater design has been addressed The deSIgn IS essentIally complete Beach by Design does not specifIcally suggest the development as proposed by thIS apphcatlOn Beach by Design reads 10 part," the scale and mtenslty of the area, WIth relatIvely few exceptIOns, IS substantIally less than comparable areas to the south" The document contemplates "Imllted new constructIOn where renovatIOn IS not practIcal" What IS proposed IS a substantIal Increase III scale to what eXIsts wIthm the Old Flonda Dlstnct The development IS not vIsually Illterestmg and the massmg and scale do not comply WIth the Intended character of the "Old Flonda DIstnct" and Beach by DeSign The applIcatIOn proposes to maxnTIlze the allowable denSity and IS seekIng seven vanatIOns from the Code to make thIS project work (reductIOns III lot SIze, WIdth, setbacks, and an Increase In bmldmg heIght) The proposed use IS acceptable, but the overall scale IS not compatIble WIth the eXIstmg surroundmg land uses The proposed reductIon In lot area wIll result III a bmldmg, WhIch IS out of scale WIth eXIstmg bUlldmgs m the Immediate vIcImty of the parcel proposed for development The proposed Illcreased III heIght does not result III an Improved SIte plan or Improved deSIgn and appearance The proposed reducttons III side setbacks do not result III an Improved Site plan, more efficient parkIng or Improved deSIgn and appearance Development of the land, as proposed, wIll not be m harmony With the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent propertIes DeSIgn of the proposed development does not numnuze vIsual adverse Impacts on adjacent propertIes CODE ENFORCEMENT ANALYSIS: There are no outstandmg enforcement Issues aSSOCIated with thIS SIte Staff Report - Community Development Board - A ugu~t 17, 2004 - Case FLD2004-030 I 8 - Page 3 ST ANDARDS AND CRITERIA: (Section 2-301.1 and 2-304): STANDARD PROPOSED CONSISTENT ~NCONSISTENT MAXIMUM Four dwelhng umts X DENSITY (maximum of four dwelling units permitted) IMPERVIOUS 075 X SURFACE RATIO (lSR) (maximum ISR is .95) LOT AREA (10,000 o 148 acres, 6,479 square feet X* square feet is minimum requirement) LOT WIDTH (100 60 feet at nearest pOInt X* feet minimum required) FRONT SETBACK SIX feet at closest pomt (to pavement) X* (35 feet minimum required) REAR SETBACK (20 10 feet (to deck) x* feet . . minImum requirement) SIDE SETBACK (10 North etght feet X* feet . . South zero feet to walkway mIDlmum requirement) HEIGHT (35 - 100 51 83 feet X* feet allowable FLD ranee) PARKING SPACES SIX spaces, 1 5 spaces per umt X (1.5 per unit required) * See analysts above for diSCUSSIOn Staff Report - Commumty Development Board - August ] 7, 2004 - Case FLD2004-030 18 - Page 4 FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA (Section 2-S03.B) applicable to lot area and wIdth, budding h . h d tb k eI21 t an se ac s: Consistent Inconsistent 1 The reductIOn In lot area wIll not result In a bUIldIng, whIch IS out of scale WIth eXIstmg bUlldmgs m the nnmedmte VICInity of the parcel [X] proposed for development 2 The use of the parcel proposed for development wIll not mvolve direct [X] access to an artenal street 3 The Illcreased height results In an Improved SIte plan or Improved [ ] [X] desIgn and appearance 4 The Illcreased heIght IS necessary to allow the Improvement of off- [X] [ ] street parkmg on the ground floor of the residential bUlldmg 5 The reduction In sIde setback does not prevent access to the rear of [ ] [X] any bUlldmg by emergency vehicles , 6 The reduction m side setback results III an Improved Site plan, more [ ] [X] effICient parkmg or Improved deSIgn and appearance GENERAL STANDARDS (Section 3-913): Consistent Inconsistent 1 Development of the land wIll be m hannony WIth the scale, bulk, [ ] [X] coverage, densIty and character of adlacent propertIes 2 Development wIll not hmder or discourage development and use of [X] [ ] adjacent land and bUlldmgs or sIgnIfIcantly Imp31r the value thereof 3 Development wIll not adversely affect the health or safety of persons [X] [ ] resldmg or workIng In the neIghborhood 4 Development IS deSIgned to mInImize traffIc congestIOn [X] [ ] 5 Development IS consistent WIth the communIty character of the [ ] [X] Immediate VICInIty 6 DeSIgn of the proposed development mmnllizes adverse effects, [ ] [X] mcludmg vIsual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operatIOn Impacts on adJacent proDertles Staff Report - Community Development Board - August 17 2004 - Case FLD2004-030 18 - Page 5 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development RevIew Comrruttee revIewed the applIcatIOn and supportmg matenals at Its meetmgs on May 6,2004 and June 10,2004 The Planmng Department recommends DENIAL of the FleXible Development apphcatIon to develop four resIdentIal attached dwellmg UnIts on (1) a 6,479 square foot lot (10,000 square feet IS reqUired), wIth (2) a lTllmIDum lot wIdth of 60 feet (100 feet IS requIred), seekmg (3) a reductIOn m the front setback from 15 feet to SIX feet to pavement, (4) a reductIon In the sIde (south) setback from 10 feet to zero feet to wooden deck walkway, (5) a reductIOn of the Side (north) setback from 10 feet to eIght feet (to bUIldmg), (6) a reductIOn of the rear setback from 20 feet to 10 feet to wooden deck, and (7) a bUIldmg height mcrease from 35 feet to 51 83 feet from FEMA to roof rmdpomt under the provISIOns of Sechon 2-803 B. Bases for Demal 1 The proposal does not comply wIth the flexIble Development cntena per SectIOn 2-803 B 2 The proposal IS not m complIance wIth other standards m the Code mcludmg the General ApphcabIhty Cntena per SectIOn 3-913 3 The development IS not compatible With the surroundmg area and Will not enhance other redevelopment efforts m the vIclmty of the SIte locatIOn 4 The proposed development IS mconsIstent With what IS proposed wlthm Beach by Deslgn for property wlthm the Old Flonda DIstnct Prepared by Planmng Department Staff ht,~ /1. ~~ MIchael H Reynolds, AlCP, Planner ill A IT ACHMENTS Aenal Photograph of SIte and VICInIty LocatIOn Map Future Land Use Map Zomng Atlas Map ApplicatIOn S \Plannmg Departmenfl-C D l!IFLEX\Pendrng cases\Up for the next CDlJ\Bay E!>plonode 669 La RI.la II (TN lay Lwlanade 669 Slaff Repar/II jar August 17 2004 meetmg doc Staff Report - Community Development Bo.ud - August 17, 2004 - Case FLD2004-030 18 - Page 6 CDB Meetmg Date Case Number Agenda Item Applicant Address August 17. 2004 FLD2004-030 18 EI RadclIffe Development Company. LLC 669 Bav Esplanade AL TERNA TE APPROVAL CONDITIONS The followmg are potential condItIOns that may be Imposed should the application be approved ConditIOns of Approval 1 That the sIte plan be revIsed to remove the walkway proposed along the south side of the sIte, pnor to bUIldmg penrut Issuance, 2 That the fmal design and color of the bUlldmg be conSIstent WIth the conceptual elevatIOns subnntted to, or as modifIed by, the CDB, 3 That boats moored at the eXlstmg and any future docks be for the exclusIve use by the reSIdents and/or guests of the condonnmums, 4 That all sIgnage meet Code and be archItecturally-mtegrated mto the design of the sIte and bUIldmg, S That there be no Jet skI or other lIke watercraft rental busmesses at thIS locatIOn, 6 That the SWFWMD penrut or letter of exceptIon be proVided to Planmng staff pnor to any bUIldmg perrmt Issuance, 7 That a revised landscape plan be subnntted to the satIsfactIOn of Planmng staff, pnor to any bUIldmg permit Issuance, 8 That a revIsed tree survey be submItted to the satisfaction of Planmng staff, pnor to any bUIldmg penrut Issuance, 9 That the fIre servIce plpelme mstallatlon be addressed to' the satisfactIOn of Engmeenng staff, pnor to bUIldmg permIt Issuance, 10 That Open Space, RecreatIOn Land and RecreatIOn FaCility Impact fees be satIsfIed pnor to the Issuance of bUIldmg penruts or fmal plat, whIchever occurs fIrst; 11 That all FIre Department reqUIrements be addressed pnor to bUIldmg permit Issuance, 12 That all proposed utilIties (from the nghts-of-way to the proposed bUIldmgs) be placed underground and mstallatIOn of condutt(s) along the entIre length of the site's street frontages be completed pnor to the Issuance of the first certIficate of occupancy, 13 That TraffiC Impact Fees be detenruned and p3ld pnor to CertifIcate of Occupancy Issuance, 14 That the condommlUm plat be recorded WIth Pmellas County pnor to the fIrst CertIfIcate of Occupancy, and 15 That the fIre servIce pipeline be mstalled by the contractor and the tappmg sleeve/valve and backflow preventor/meter be mstalled by the City at the applIcant's expense, pnor to the first Certificate of Occupancy S \Plarmmg Departmen^C D EflFLEX\Pendlllg casei\Up for /lU! Jli?XI CDffiBa)' Esplanade 669 La Rl~a If (f]\Bay Esplanade 669 Allelnale Summary and RewmmendatlOlI doc SEt 1[1 Ii lG REF'DPT Rug. 12 2004 03:37PM YOUR LOGO YOUR FRX NO Clt~OfClearwater-Plan Dept 727 562 4865 NO. OTHER FRCSIMILE 01 97939855 STRRT TIME USRGE TIME MODE PRGES RESULT Aug. 12 03 32PM 04'40 SND 08 OK TO TIJRN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MB"-U' 1:104. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FRX ADVANTAGE ASS I STRNCE, PLEASE CALL 1-8lID-t1B..P-PRX (435-7329). Reynolds, Mike From: Sent To. Cc: Subject Reynolds, Mike Thursday, July 29,200411 01 AM 'kelth @ kelthzayac com' Tarapanl, Cyndl, Fierce, Lisa, Gerlock, Chip, 'troYP@Jpflrm com', 'ehooper1 @aol com' FLD2004-03018, 669 Bay Esplanade, La Rlsa II Keith, I am sending this e-mail as a follow-up to our telephone dlScusslDn last week As we discussed, 15 caples of all La Rlsa 2 site plan subm tnal materials will be delivered on Aug ust 2, 2004, Monday to meet the Aug ust 17, 2004 COB meeting schedule August 2 IS the submittal date If the proposal IS the same as what was presented to the COB meeting on July 20, 2004 (Please submit your plan matenals copies by 12 noon) If the site plan IS redesigned, a later COB meeting date will need to be scheduled In order to allow for public notice and staff revIew Please contact me with any questIons Mike Reynolds, AICP, Senior Planner City of Clearwater - 727-562-4836 mike revnolds@mvclearwater com 1 .. Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc~ CIvil Engineering Landscape Architecture Planning 701 S Enterpflse R08Cl E Ste 404 Safety Harbor FL 3469') (727) 793-9888 Phone \ 727) 793-985:' Fax keIUlla)kellhzayac.. COI2-1 June 17, 2004 Mr Mike Reynolds CIty of Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 o ~~~~W~ ra nJ ~~[)) r' ,\ I", & r.:~VElOPMENT SERVICES , or:- CLE'-\RWATEA " -:!\ RE FLD2004..o3018..669 BAY ESPLANADE Dear Mr ReynDlds , Enclosed please find 15 caples of the revised CIVil engineering plans addressing comments received at the June 10, 2004 ORC meeting Including the followmg GENERAL ENGINEERING 1 The fire service pipeline to the standpipe has been revised per DRC meeting comments 2 The fire service line has been revised to 4" diameter FIRE The FOC has been revised to be on a freestanding pipe 2 Note #8 has been revised to Include "and hydrants" 3 It IS acknowledged that comments 2 through 6 will be addressed pnor to permit on tt'te bUilding plans 7 A note has been added to the plans calling for a Knox Key Box 8 The wet standpipe has been revised per request 9 It IS acknowledged that comment 9 Will be addressed pnor to building permit LAND RESOURCES The tree Information requested Will be redllned on the plans upon receipt of the two nllSslng trees as previously requested LANDSCAPING 1 The landscaping deSign was Intended to allow a future wood walkway to a future dock by plantIng only shrubs that can be removed or relocated when constructed The current dock Will not be accessible to this project 2 A curb has been added to the front driveway ,IUl I ? 2004 ;, 3 The sprengeru fern has been replaced with Lily Turf 1 A cross section of the pond IS Included within the plans NIN-G Q r',:vr LOPMEN1 PLAN ' <.~ . ,- ~ SERVIC~S CITY OF CLE'_F\vJATER STORMWATER 2 The mean high tide of elevation 250 Ilas been used for the design A drawdown analysIs will be prOVided prior to permit PLANNING 1 1 The site plan now shows all dimenSions, footprint and size of the bUilding, setbacks, accessways and site triangles Notes on the site olan state that there are no enVIronmentally unique areas or easements on the site The parking spaces are Identified within the bUilding, as IS the solid waste area The outdoor lighting IS attached to the bUilding as stated on the site plan The proposed walkways are show on the plans 1 2 The site has been revised to prOVide 8 ft north side buffer, 6 ft front buffer, and 0 ft sourh side buffer Due to the geometry of the bUilding and reqUired life-safety stanways, thiS IS the best site deSign pOSSible 1 3 The use of the future docks will be Ilmrted to laRlsa I and laRlsa Ii reSidents 1 4 The slte plans shows all bUilding columns 1 5 The screening of the plans has been modified for clarity 1 6 The width of the stairs IS Included 011 the site plan 1 7 The floor plans In the last submittal are conSistent 1 8 The restroom/shower IS for reSidents usrng the oeck and doc..k 1 9 The cabanas, as previously explained are for the use of LaRlsa I & II reSidents for c.hanglng, storage and pnvacy while uSing the deck and future docks 1 10 The two sets of stairs are required by City code 2 There are no known easements an the site 3 The prevIously submitted bUilding elevations are In color, show all Sides of the building, have dImensIonal arrows and state heIght from BFE 4 The bUilding plans remain as deSign 5 The demolition plan a~ show IS depicted to show evelythlng on the site to be demolished 6 The dock has been revised to prOVide a 1 a-foot rear setback and a Comprehensive Inflll Redevelopment application form IS not needed 7 The site plan has been revised to InClude Information requested , B A color landscape plan IS Included 9 The site plan notes have been consolidated as requested 10 The site data table has been revised as requested 11 A separate sIgn application will be submItted as stated on the site plan 12 The application form remains as submitted 13 The bUilding and stairs are dimenSioned 14 The proposed sIde setback has been revIsed to 0 0 feet to the wooden deck Sincerely, Keith E Zayac, P E, RLA PresIdent KeIth Zayac & Associates, Inc o ~~~~~~ \R\ Nr",'lt-.tr; "I pLA' _ Q\ r' ..) S T'l ~'- ~ OF Cl 8-..RWATER C\ [1 - ,- ~:t.. _~f ~.., -- ~ ~€~ earwater ~ 11111- - 11-;- FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE., 2nd Floor CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO: r/l4;,y /J~/~A- '7? 1~ .- 03 b S- FAX: Phone: - FROM: ~f<6 /l~"r-.AA::J &0'/ Phone: J6 2..- ~Jl-.7' cP-/6 --o~ SUBJECT: ,H--t? 2r>6V-- 030/? DATE: MESSAGE: ctb""7' /J;; ,/M Y um~ A~.q<r f,~ P4-)( e47 ,711 /,#., 7).,1 ~-4-t?- tfr-V rP - /;z ....- 6 V~ NUMHER OF PAGES(1NCLUDING TInS PAGE) p CDB Meetmg Date Case Number Agenda Item ApplIcant Address August 17, 2004 FLD2004-030 18 El Radchffe Development Company. LLC 669 Bay Esplanade Loft CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Development approval to penrut attached dwellIngs WIth (1) a reductIOn of the mInImUm lot area from 10,000 square feet to 6,479 square feet, (2) a reductIon of mInImum lot width from 100 feet to 60 feet, (3) a reductIOn of the front setback from 15 feet to SIX feet (to pavement), (4) a reductIOn of the side (south) setback from 10 feet to zero feet to wooden walkway, (5) a reductIOn of the sIde (north) setback from 10 feet to eIght feet (to bUIldmg), (6) a reductIOn of the rear setback from 20 feet to 10 feet (to deck), and (7) a bUIldmg heIght mcrease from 35 feet to 51 83 feet from FEMA to mIdpomt of the roof under the provISIons of SectIOn 2- 803 B EXISTING ZONINGI LAND USE: Tounst (T) Dlstnct, Resort FacIhtles High (RFH) Category PROPERTY SIZE: o 148 acres, 6,479 square feet PROPERTY USE: Current Use Apartments (8 UnIts) Proposed Use MultI-famIly resIdentIal (4 UnIts) ADJACENT ZONINGI LAND USES: North Tounst Dlstnct (T), OvernIght accommodations West Tounst Dlstnct (T), Overnight accommodations and attached dwellmgs East Clearwater Harbor and Tounst Distnct (T), Clearwater Harbor South Tounst Dlstnct (T), Attached dwellmgs CHARACTER OF THE Il\tThiEDIA TE VICIN1TY: Scenic north-south beach comdor, overnIght lodgmg, multi-famIly reSidentIal, and commercIal Staff Report. Conunumty Development Board - August 17, 2004 - Case FLD2004-030 18 - Page 1 UPDA TE: ThIs case was contmued from the July 20, 2004 Commumty Development Board meetmg after a lengthy diSCUSSIOn A motIOn to approve the case faIled by a vote of 2-3 and the case was automatIcally contmued The staff report and subrmttal remam unchanged ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: ThIs 0.148-acre sIte IS located on the east sIde of Bay Esplanade, approXImately 300 feet south of Somerset Street OvernIght accommodatIOns and attached dwelhngs dormnate the ImmedIate VICInIty to the west, south, and north By Code, the allowable denSity on thIS sIte IS five hotel umts or four dwellIng umts The SIte contams an eXIstmg, smgle-story, eIght-umt apartment bUlldmg, WIth back out parkIng on Bay Esplanade There IS an eXisting deck on the east Side of the sIte and an eXIstmg walkway from the front of the sIte to the rear along the south property hne The eXIstmg buIldmg and ItS parkmg area fIt tIghtly onto the SIte There IS lnruted landscapmg There IS one eXIstmg dock, located at the east SIde of the SIte, IS proposed to remam by thIS redevelopment request The SIte IS located wlthm the speCIal area redevelopment plan, Beach by DeSign, as part of the "Old Flonda" Dlstnct ThIS area has been deSIgnated for multI-fmruly townhomes and condonumums of low to mIdnse The ImmedIate VlcImty IS almost entlfely composed of attached dwelhngs and small motels BUlldmg styles generally resemble archItecture from the 1950's and appear to have been progreSSIVely expanded Bay Esplanade, m thIS general VICInIty, IS a local street With no Sidewalks where many SItes rely on the pubhc nght-of-way to accommodate perpendIcular, back-out parkmg Generally, the streetscape IS m need of redevelopment to Improve parkmg, pedestnan access, and ItS aesthetIc appearance Beach by DeSign recogmzes SIte constramts of parcels m the neIghborhood and dIffIcultIes of redevelopment Proposal: The proposal IS to completely raze the eXlstmg apartments and construct four attached dwell~ngs ("La Rlsa IT') The applIcatIOn IS seekmg approval of the use, lot SIze and WIdth reductIOns, setback reductIOns, plus an mcrease m height The proposal shows SIX on-sIte parkmg spaces at ground level The bUIldmg IS proposed to be four stones above parkmg and reach to 51 83 feet flOm a FEMA bUIldmg hne to roof nndpomt ThIS site IS located wlthm a flood zone (Zone AE) WIth an elevatIOn of 11 feet The bUIldmg elevatIOns show four stones wIth a rooftop terrace over parkIng There IS an elevator overrun tower extendmg over the roof terrace The deSIgn of the bUIldmg mc1udes arched styhng With some of the doorways and wmdows Large wmdows are show on the east elevatIOn, With VIews of Clearwater Harbor The plans show the bUIldmgs to have a beIge color stucco fmlsh WIth a red-brown color roof Wmdows are proposed to have alummum frammg With a precast stone look tnm The roof IS shown to have a clay tIle nuSSlon shape Wrought tron railings Will be attached to walkways and platforms outSide the bUIldmg on fIve levels The north and west elevatIOns show a decoratIve archItectural medallion on the north and west SIdes of the elevator tower Extenor stairs are shown on the north elevatIon, from the ground level to the roof Wmdows and doors proposed on the north and south elevatIOns do not meet BUIldmg Code The setbacks as proposed hrmt the use of wmdows and doors to 10 percent ofthe bUlldmg fa<;ade Staff Report - Commumty Development BOMd - August 17, 2004 - else FLD2004-030 18 - Page 2 VehICular and pedestnan safety would be improved, as there WIll no longer be any back out parkIng onto Bay Esplanade A wooden walkway is proposed along the south sIde of the property for access to the rear deck and dock Five cabanas and a rest room are shown on the SIte plan at the rear of the site The deck and dock amemty IS proposed to be shared wIth reSIdents of a resIdenttal development across the street tD the west, (La Risa I) Trash collectIOn IS proposed to be made from a solId waste dumpster located mSIde the bUIldIng at the front (west SIde) of the SIte The dumpster is to be rolled out by complex maIntenance to a stagIng area While there IS a landscape plan, the proposed setbacks reduce the opportUnIty for green space A SIx-foot hIgh opaque fence IS proposed along the south SIde of the property Prehmmary stormwater desIgn has been addressed The desIgn IS essenttally complete Beach by Deslgn does not specIfIcally suggest the development as proposed by thIS applIcatIOn Beach by Deslgn reads In part," the scale and mtensIty of the area, WIth relatively few exceptIOns, IS substantIally less than comparable areas to the south" The document contemplates "lnTIlted new constructlOo where renovatIOn IS not practIcal" What IS proposed IS a substantial Increase m scale to what eXists wIthm the Old Flonda DIstnct The development IS not VIsually Interestmg and the massIng and scale do not comply WIth the mtended character of the "Old Flonda Dlstnct" and Beach by DeSIgn The apphcatlOn proposes to maXImIze the allowable denSIty and IS seekIng seven vanatlOns from the Code to make thIS prOject work (reductIOns In lot SIze, WIdth, setbacks, and an Increase m bUlldmg heIght) The proposed use IS acceptable, but the overall scale IS not compatIble WIth the eXlstmg surroundmg land uses The proposed reductIOn In lot area WIll result In a bUlldmg, whIch IS out of scale WIth eXistmg bUIldmgs m the lInmedtate vIcImty of the parcel proposed for development The proposed Illcreased In height does not result In an Improved SIte plan or Improved deSIgn and appearance The proposed reductIons III SIde setbacks do not result In an Improved SIte plan, more effiCient parkIng or Improved deSIgn and appearance Development of the land, as proposed, WIll not be In harmony WIth the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent propertIes DeSIgn of the proposed development does not ITIlmmIZe VIsual ddverse Impacts on adj8cent propertIes CODE ENFORCEMENT ANALYSIS: There are no outstandIng enforcement Issues assocIated WIth thIS SIte Stdff Report - Commumty Development Board - August 17,2004 - Case FLD2004-03018. Page 3 STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: (Section 2-301.1 and 2-304): STANDARD PROPOSED CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT MAXIMUM Four dwellmg umts X DENSITY (maximum of four dwelling units permitted) IMPERVIOUS 075 X SURFACE RATIO (ISR) (maximum ISR is .95) LOT AREA (10,000 o 148 acres, 6,479 square feet X* square feet is minimum requirement) LOT WIDTH (100 60 feet at nearest pomt X* feet minimum required) FRONT SETBACK SIX feet at closest pomt (to pavement) X* (35 feet minimum reQuired) REAR SETBACK (20 10 feet (to deck) X* feet . . minImum reQ uirement) SIDE SETBACK (10 North eIght feet X* feet . . South zero feet to walkway mmlmum requirement) HEIGHT (35 - 100 51 83 feet X* feet allowable FLD ran2:e) PARKING SPACES SIX spaces, 1 5 spaces per umt X (1.5 per umt required) * See analysIs above for diSCUSSIOn Staff Reporl- Commumty Development Board - AugUSI17, 2004 - Ca,e FLD2004-03018 - Page 4 FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA (Section 2-S03.B) applicable to lot area and width, building hOh d b k ell!1 t an set ac s: Consistent Inconsistent 1 The reductIOn m lot area wIll not result 10 a bUlldmg, which IS out of scale wIth eXlstmg bUlldmgs m the Immed1ate vIcmlty of the parcel [X] proposed for development 2 The use of the parcel proposed for development wtll not mvolve d1rect [X] access to an artenal street 3 The mcreased height results In an Improved sIte plan or Improved [ ] [X] deSign and appearance 4 The Increased heIght IS necessary to allow the Improvement of off- [X] [ ] street parkmg on the ground floor of the resIdential buddmg 5 The reductIon m Side setback does not prevent access to the rear of [ ] [X] any bmld1ng by emergency vehicles 6 The reductIon m SIde setback results m an Improved SIte plan, more [ ] [X] effiCIent park10g or Improved desIgn and appearance GENERAL STANDARDS (Section 3-913): Consistent Inconsistent 1 Development of the land WIll be m hannony With the scale, bulk, [ ] [X] coverage, denSity and character of adlacent propertIes 2 Development Will not hmder or d1scourage development and use of [X] [ ] adjacent land and bmldmgs or slgmflcantly Impair the value thereof 3 Development WIll not adversely affect the health or safety of persons [X] [ ] resIdmg or workmg m the neIghborhood 4 Development IS deSIgned to lIl1ll1mIZe traffic congestIOn [X] [ ] 5 Development IS consistent WIth the commumty character of the [ ] [X] Immediate VICInIty 6 DeSign of the proposed development mmmuzes adverse effects, [ ] [X] mcludmg Visual, acoustIc and olfactory and hours of operatIOn Impacts on ad1acent propertIes Staff Report - Community Development Board - August 17, 2004 - Case FLD2004-030 18 - Page 5 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development ReVIew Comrrnttee reviewed the applIcatIOn and supportmg matenals at Its meetings on May 6,2004 and June 10,2004 The Planning Department recommends DENIAL of the fleXible Development applIcation to develop four reSidential attached dwelling umts on (1) a 6,479 square foot lot (10,000 square feet IS reqUired), With (2) a mlllImum lot wIdth of 60 feet (100 feet IS reqUired), seekmg (3) a reductIon III the front setback from 15 feet to SIX feet to pavement, (4) a reductlon m the side (south) setback from 10 feet to zero feet to wooden deck walkway, (5) a reductIOn of the sIde (north) setback from 10 feet to eIght feet (to bUlldmg), (6) a reductIOn of the rear setback from 20 feet to 10 feet to wooden deck, and (7) a bUlldmg heIght mcrease from 35 feet to 51 83 feet from FEMA to roof mIdpomt under the proVISIOns of SectIOn 2-803 B Bases for Demal' 1 The proposal does not comply WIth the FlexIble Development cntena per SectIOn 2-803 B 2 The proposal IS not m complIance With other standards m the Code mcludmg the General ApphcabilIty Cntena per SectIOn 3-913 3 The development IS not compatIble WIth the surroundmg area and wIll not enhance other redevelopment efforts In the vIclmty of the SIte locatIOn 4 The proposed development IS mconsIstent WIth what IS proposed wIthm Beach by DeSign for property wIthm the Old Honda DIstnct Prepared by Plannmg Department Staff ht~~ /J~ ~~ MIchael H Reynolds, AICP, Planner III ATTACHMENTS Aenal Photograph of Site and VICInIty LocatIOn Map Future Land Use Map Zomng Atlas Map ApplIcatIon S \Plmllllllg Departmenf\C D B\FLEXV'endmg wse \\Up for the next CDBVJay C~planade 669 La Rl;,a 1I (TflBay E~planade 669 Staff Report fl for August 17 2004 meetmg doc Staff Report - Commumty Development Buard - Augu~t 17, 2004 - Case FLD2004-030 18 - Page 6 CDB Meeting Date Case Number Agenda Item Apphcant Address August 17,2004 FLD2004-030 18 El RadclIffe Development Company, LLC 669 Bay Esplanade AL TERNA TE APPROVAL CONDITIONS The followmg are potentIal condItIons that may be Imposed should the applIcatIOn be approved' CondttIons of Approval 1 That the sIte plan be reVIsed to remove the walkway proposed along the south sIde of the site, pnor to bUIldmg permit Issuance, 2 That the fmal desIgn and color of the bUlldmg be conSistent WIth the conceptual elevatIons subnutted to, or as modtfIed by, the CDB, 3. That boats moored at the eXIstmg and any future docks be for the exclUSIve use by the resIdents and/or guests of the condonuTIlums, 4 That all sIgnage meet Code and be archltecturally-mtegrated mto the desIgn of the site and bUIldmg, 5 That there be no Jet skI or other lIke watercraft rental busmesses at thiS locatIOn, 6 That the SWFWMD permIt or letter of exceptIOn be provIded to Planmng staff pnor to any bUlldmg permIt Issuance, 7 That a reVised landscape plan be submItted to the satIsfactIOn of Planmng staff, pnor to any bUlldmg permIt Issuance, 8 That a reVIsed tree survey be subnutted to the satIsfactIon of Planmng staff, pnor to any bUlldmg permit Issuance, 9 That the fIre serVIce pipeline mstallatIOn be addressed to the satisfactIon of Engmeenng staff, pnor to bUlldmg penrut Issuance, 10 That Open Space, RecreatIOn Land and RecreatIOn FacIlIty Impact fees be satlsfled pnor to the Issuance of bUIldmg permIts or fmal plat, whIchever occurs first, 11 That all Fue Department reqUIrements be addressed pnor to bUlldmg penrut Issuance, 12 That all proposed utIlItIes (from the nghts-of-way to the proposed bUIldmgs) be placed underground and mstallatlOn of condUIt(s) along the entIre length of the SIte's street frontages be completed pnor to the Issuance of the fust certIficate of occupancy, 13 That TraffIC Impact Fees be detenruned and paid pnor to CertifIcate of Occupancy Issuance, 14 That the condonunmm plat be recorded WIth Pmellas County pnor to the fIrst CertifIcate of Occupancy, and 15 That the fIre servIce pIpelIne be mstalled by the contractor and the tappmg sleeve/valve and backflow preventor/meter be mstalled by the City at the applIcant's expense, pnor to the fIrst CertifIcate of Occupancy S I,Plannmg Departmenf\C D 8\FLEXlPendmg CQses\Up for the next CDlNJay &plallade 669 La Rl~a II (TN3ay Esplallade 669 Altemale Summa!)' alld RecommelldarlOn doc , Rev.nn1ds, Mike From" Sent: To Ce' Subject: Reynolds, Mike Monday, August 23, 2004 1 00 PM Fierce, Lisa Gerlock, Chip RE meetIng today re 669 bay esplanade Lisa, At our meeting this morning, the development team of Bob Flynt, Ed Hooper, Dave Green (of O'Keefe Architects) and Keith Zayak presented the follOWing reVISions to the site plan submittal 1 Remove wDoden walkway from the street to rear of the SIte 2 Slight shift of the bUilding to the nDrth (approximately one foot) 3 The service room (elevator/trash) area within the northwest corner of the bUilding has slight changes that Include the trash room door openmg now to the outside of the bUilding 4 The northwest walkway now goes straight out to the street Before It Jogged to the south, along Side the service room 5 There IS now a continuous hedge on the south Side of the lot 6 The bUilding elevations were revised to comply with allowable openmgs I Will check with you on when we can meet Mike Reynolds, AICP, Senior Planner City of Clearwater - 727-562-4836 mike revnolds@mvclearwatercom nmOnglnal Message----- From: Fierce, usa Sent: Monday, August 23,2004 8 16 AM To: Gerlock, Chip, Reynolds, Mike Subject meetmg today re 669 bay esplanade Importance: High I would like for you two to handle thiS meeting with kelth zayak (I think It IS at 1030 am), dont feel obligated to give our "final answer" at the meeting, you can tell them we WIll get back with them tomorrow, I wDuld like to see the revIsions and have a dlSCUSSIDn about whether they made substantial, recommendation-altering changes or a minor amendment, I can meet prior to manager's to discuss or right after Lisa L Fierce City of Clearwater Assistant Plonnlngl)lrector hso flerce@MvClearwoter com 7275624561 phone * 7275624865 fox Buckeye and Buccaneer Fan - GO Bf./C(K).SI 1 Reynold's, Mike ~ From: Sent To: Subject Fierce, Lisa Monday, August 23, 2004 8 16 AM Gerlock, Chip, Reynolds, Mike meeting today re 669 bay esplanade Importance' High I would like for you two to handle this meeting with kelth zayak (Ithmk It IS at 1030 am), dont feel obligated to give our "fmal answer" at the meeting, you can tell them we will get back with them tomorrow, I wDuld like to see the revIsions and have a dIScussion about whether they made substantial, recommendation-altering changes or a minor amendment, I can meet prior to manager's to dIscuss or fight after Lisa L. Fierce City of Clearwater Assistant Planning Director Irsa flerce@MyCleorwater com 7275624561 phone" 7275624865 fox Buckeye and Buccaneer Fan - GO BUC(K)SI 1 , < , , II TO: FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE., 2nd Floor CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562..4865 1r()y ;O.€-?-/ tue $I b 2-- t136 r FAX: Phone: - FROM: /l1/1(e /(.,y/'tA I'd Phone: r( Z - ~ /'J ~ /0 -2cr-,O.V SUBJECT: ~ ~6V- t'!) ;JO/cP- tf6'7 AJ,Ay k/t!.<W~ DA TE: MESSAGE: NUlVIBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING THIS PAGE) i7 III JfJrA:7T--H:>>-..... ~~'o.\ALOF r/ft';r- ..~~ l)",..rl~-#'~~~7~ ,~~.., -"r;.'Po "'h," \ I, ~~':. "" ':. ~-~'''-' / , ~-'" ,,_'- - \, '_Ol "....... = ~~ ':.u;;i\ ~ ~'" ':.~~._-- ",~~ ~rlf.-~--"'~'\;t,\\ .......~...)11ER 'l-' '#'-i7/ iOl J /1' CITY OF CLEARWATER lONG RANGIo. PlANNING DEVEWPMEt\'T RFVlEW PLA.NNING DEPARTMENT Pasl OFFICio. Box 4748, Cn.ARWATER, FWRlDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAl SFRVlCE<; BUILDING, 100 SOlnH MYRTLE AVE'JUC, CLEARWAnR, FlORIDA 33756 THlcPHONc (27) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 October 22, 2004 Mr KeIth Zayak KeIth Zayak & AssOcIates, Inc 101 PhIlIppe Parkway Safety Harbor, Flonda 34695 RE Development Order - Case FLD2004-03018 - 669 Bay Esplanade ) Dear Mr Zayak ThIS letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to SectIOn 4-206D 6 of the Commumty Development Code On October 19, 2004, the Commumty Development Board revIewed your FlexIble Development applIcatlon to pell11lt attached dwellIngs wIth (1) a reductIOn of the ITIlmmum lot area from 10,000 square feet to 6,479 square feet, (2) a reductIOn of ITIlmmum lot wIdth from 100 feet to 60 feet; (3) a reduction of the front setback from 15 feet to 5 69 feet (to pavement), (4) a reduction of the sIde (south) setback from 10 feet to four feet to extenor staIrs; (5) a reduction of the sIde (north) setback from 10 feet to 6 72 feet (to bUlldmg), (6) a reductIOn of the rear setback from 20 feet to 10 feet (to wooden deck), and (7) a bUlldmg height mcrease from 35 feet to 51 83 feet from FEMA to ITIldpomt of the roof under the provIsions of SectIOn 2- 803 B for the SIte at 669 Bay Esplanade Based on the applIcation and the Staff recommendatIon, the Commumty Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the applIcatIOn wIth the followmg condttIons CondIttons of Approval 1 That the fmal deSign and color of the bUIldIng be consistent With the conceptual elevations subnutted to, or as modIfIed by, the CDB, . 2 That boats moored at the eXlstmg and any future docks be for the exclusive use by the reSidents and/or guests of the condormmums, 3 That all slgnage meet Code and be archltecturally-mtegrated Into the deSIgn of the slte and bUIldIng, 4 That there be no Jet ski or other lIke watercraft rental bUSInesses at thIS locatIOn, 5 That the SWFWMD perrmt or letter of exceptIOn be proVIded to Plannmg staff pnor to any bUilding permit Issuance, 6 That a reVised landscape plan be submitted to the satisfactIOn of Planmng staff, pnor to any bUIldIng perm]t Issuance, 7 That a reVIsed tree survey be submItted to the satlsfactlOn of Plannmg staff, pnor to any bUIldIng penrut Issuance, BRIAN J AUN(,'>T, MArOR COMMI~'>IONrR HoY! I-!AMIIlOr-, Vwr MAYOR-COMMI'<'IONI R Wrllll>h GR~Y, CO\IMI~,IOt\I]{ FRAl'< '- HlIJlJAIH"J, COM~W,<;IONI R * BII I J ON'>Ol'>, CO"I"tl~'<IOf',1 H 'TQUAI [011'101'011 NI AN]) All UlMAllVl Au ION h1PI OY1]{" October 22,2004 KeIth Zayak, Page Two 8 That the fIre service Plpelme installation be addressed to the satisfactIOn of Engmeenng staff, pnor to bUlldmg penmt Issuance, 9 That Open Space, RecreatIon Land and Recreation FacIlIty Impact fees be satIsfIed pnor to the Issuance of bUIldmg penmts or final plat, whIchever occurs first, 10 That all Fire Department requIrements be addressed pnor to bUIldIng penmt Issuance, 11 That all proposed utIlItIes (from the nghts-of-way to the proposed bUlldmgs) be placed underground and InstallatIon of condUlt(s) along the entIre length of the site's street frontages be completed pnor to the Issuance of the fust certificate of occupancy, 12 That Traffic Impact Fees be detenmned and patd pnor to CertifIcate of Occupancy Issuance, 13 That the condommlUm plat be recorded With Pmellas County pnor to the fIrst Certlflcate of Occupancy, and 14 That the applicant mstall a sIx-foot bnck wall along the south property line, conSistent WIth the reVIsed sIte plan, so as to redIrect pedestnan traffic onto the adjacent southern property Pursuant to SectIOn 4-407, an applIcatIOn for a bUlldmg permIt shall be made WIthin one year of FleXIble Development approval (by October 19, 2005) All reqUired certIficates of occupancy shall be obtamed WIthm one year of the date of Issuance of the bUIldmg permIt Time frames do not change WIth succeSSIVe owners The Commumty Development Coordinator may grant an extenSIOn of tlme for a penod not to exceed one year and only wlthm the ongmal penod of vahdIty The Commumty Development Board may approve one addItlonal extenSIOn of tIme after the Commumty Development Coordmator's extension to Imtlate a bUIldmg penmt applIcatIOn. The Issuance of thIS Development Order does not reheve you of the neceSSIty to obtam any bUlldmg permits or pay any Impact fees that may be reqUired In order to faCIlItate the Issuance of any pennIt or lIcense affected by thIS approval, please bnng a copy of thIS letter With you when applymg for any permIts or lIcenses that require thiS pnor development approval Addltlonally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (FleXIble Development) may be InItiated pursuant to SectIOn 4-502 B by the applicant or by any person granted party status wlthm 14 days of the ddte of the Commumty Development Board meetmg The filmg of an applicatIOn/nOtlCe of appeal shall stay the effect of the deCISIon pendmg the fmal determmatlon of the case The appeal penod for your case expues on November 2,2004 If you have any queStIons, please do not heSitate to call Michael H Reynolds, AICP, Planner ill, at 727-562-4836 You can access zomng mformatIOn for parcels wlthm the CIty through our webSIte www c1earwater-f1 com October 22, 2004 KeIth Zayak, Page Three SIncerely, ~~ Cynthia H. Tarapam, AlCP Planmng DIrector 'I \Planmng Depurlment\C D B\FLEXlJllacllve or FWI::'/I/;d AppllcatlOlISlBay Esplanade 669l.il Rlsa II (T) 10 1904 CDB - Approved\Bay Esplanade 669 Developmem Order October 22, 2004 dac r) II' ... '. ", j., JOHNSON POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS LLP AllORNr:yS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW .. 10 D ARM~TRONG III BRucr H BOKOR JOHN II. BONNER SR' GUY M RURN~ JONA fllAN S COLEMA.."I ~TAC Y CO~ INLR MICHAl L f CRONIN bLIlAllrTH J DAJ\'IELS BLCKY FERRELL-ANION COLL~~N M II YNN MARI0"l HALI: SCOTI C ILGENFRITZ FRANK II. JAI\ES liMO I HY A JOI!NSON JR SHARON E KRICK RaG loR A LARSON JOHN R LAWSON JR' LEANNE LETlZE MICHAEL G LlTILE MICHMLC MARKHAM ZACHARY D MlS~A A II. CHARLIE NEAL TROY J PERDUE r WALLACE POPE, 111. ROBERTV POncR JR AUDREY B RAUCHWAY DARRYL R RICHARDS PI:: II:R A R [VLI LINI DD>NIS'(, RUI'PI:L' CHARLES A SAMARI\OS PHiliP M ~HA~ I ~r~ JOAN M VFCCHIQLI STEVEN Ii WEINBERGER JOSFPH J WLI~SMAN STEVEN A WILLIAMSON 'U~ COUNSI:L ffO j tt9 j p t #'VI - lJ ,..., PLEASe REPLY fO CLEARW A TER FILE NO 10108455 July 19,2004 Community Development Board 100 S Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Flonda 33752 Re The La Rlsa II Development ("LaRlsa II") located at 669 Bay Esplanade, Clearwater, Flonda ("Property"), Case #FLD2004-03018 (the "Project") Dear Board Members This corresponde_nce IS Intended to address the Application for the Project In light of the Staff Report, and to indicate how the gUidelines of Beach by DeSign and, speclflcally, the Old Flonda DiStrict, are being met Property DeSCription and Character. The Property IS located on the east side of Bay Esplanade, approximately 300 feet south of Somerset Street The western property line of the Property abuts Clearwater Harbor The current zOning classification IS Tourist Dlstnct (T) The land use deSignation IS Resort Facilities High (RFH) The Property IS located In the "Old Florida District" of the Beach by DeSign Community Redevelopment District As the Staff Report notes, the area has been deSIgnated for multi-famIly townhomes and condominiums of low to mld-nse The only redevelopment that has occurred In the Immediate vIcinIty IS the "La Rlsa I" project due west from the ProJect, on the west side of Bay Esplanade To the north and south of the Property are mostly small hotels and multi-family, two-story dwellings, which are ot an aged nature and all resting on grade The hotels and/or dwellings In the area are close together With little or no setback lines and insuffiCient off-street parking The parking along Bay Esplanade IS almost exclusIvely on street parking which requires backing mto the nght-ot-way The conditions are similar to the dwellings along Somerset CLhARWATER OFFICE ~ I I (.1Ir..S1 NUT Sl POST OITICI, BOX 1361l l LF ARW ^ I LR ~LORIDA 33757-1,68 II Ll PHO'lL (127\ 461 1818 rr..L c COPIFR nn) ~62 OJ", M. I 9 2On4 TAMPA OFFlC) 100 N 1 AMPA ST ~ IJrIT I &00 POST OFFICE BOX Il()!) TAMPA FLORlDA 1>601-1100 ITI ,PHONh (8)]) 225 2500 TELECOP1ER (81,) H171 18 o ~(C~~~~ PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES . . ... JOHNSON, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS,-LLP ATTORNEYS AND COlJ'lSELLORS AT LAW July 19, 2004 Page 2 Somerset IS the street Immediately north of Bay Esplanade At the westerly end of Somerset there IS an approved redevelopment condominium project (15-17 Somerset) which IS five stones over parking (62 feet), and determined by the Board to be a "mld-nse" Also, at Chalets on White Sands, the height IS five stones over parking (56 feet) and was also determined by the Board to be an acceptable mld-nse Finally, on the west side of Bay Esplanade, the approved redevelopment that Staff has used to "officially" set the standard for a mld-nse height IS SIX stones over parkIng (70 feet) The height of the requested Project IS four umts over parking, at only 51 83 feet The ReQuest: The Applicant requests only side setbacks In conformity With a Level One Review under the Clearwater Community Development Code ("Code") Applicant IS not requesting a ReSIdential Inflll, transfers of Development Rights or any Increase In denSity Specifically, the ApplIcant requests relief as follows 1 Reduce the mlmmum lot area from 10,000 square feet to approximately 6,500 square feet due to the substandard nature of the lot, 2 Reduce the minimum lot width from 100 feet to 60 feet, agarn, due to the substandard nature of the lot, 3 Reduce the front setback along Bay Esplanade from 15 feet to 6 feet to pavement, 4 Reduce the sIde (south) setback from 10 feet to zero feet to wooden walkway, 5 Reduce the side (north) setback from 10 feet to 8 feet to bUildIng, 6 Reduce the rear setback from 20 feet to 10 feet to deck, and 7 Increase the height from 35 feet to 51 83 feet (as measured from base flood elevation) Guidelines for the Old Florida District in Beach by DesiQn: Beach by DeSign In the Old Flonda Dlstnct contemplates 1 Favonng reSidential uses 2 The use of retail uses that are neighborhood serving 3 New constructron where renovatIon of eXisting Improvements IS not practical 4 New Single-family dwellings and townhouses are a referred form of development p\JI.NNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ~._, ",..-,-, c ,nWATFR lit ... JOHNSON, POPE, BOKOR RUPPEL & BURNS, LLP ATTORNEYS AND COUNS~Ll OR~ AT LAW July 19,2004 Page 3 5 Densities In the area should be generally limited to the denSity of eXisting Improvements 6 BUIlding height should be low to mid-rise In accordance With the Community Development Code 7 Lack of parking may hmder reVitalization "particularly on Bay Esplanade" Response: The use proposed by the Applicant IS consistent With the resIdential uses In the Old Florida District Renovation of the eXisting use of the Property IS nearly Impossible and would not be encouraged, as It IS a nonconforming eight-unit, two-story apartment bUilding The Project will significantly reduce the traffiC on Bay Esplanade The Applicant's project Will replace a non-conforming use that carnes twice the denSity as permitted under current Code standards, and keep Within the denSity requirements of the Code (4 units) In conjunction With ItS sister project, La Rlsa I, located directly to the west on Bay Esplanade, the Project Will create a catalyst for renovatIon, reVitalization and new development extending north and south along Bay Esplanade The architecture of the Project IS Mediterranean ReVival, which IS consistent With a tropical theme The quality of the structure and ambiance of the Units IS consistent With an upscale, elegant beach community The colors used are consIstent With the palette suggested In Beach by DeSign Landscaping Will be conforming to the Clearwater Beach community and Will be much Improved, as the ImperviOus Surface RatiO Will be reduced to 75 (well below the maximum of 95) and much of the additional ground surface Will be landscaped Furthermore, the interior landscaping IS 100% more than reqUired by Code The Project IS consistent With the denSity permitted by T and RFH The denSity IS thirty (30) units per acre and therefore, the four (4) dwelling Units proposed are permitted on the Property The Applicant has speCIfically deSigned the Project so as to remove all parking from the view of the street and house them inSide of the bUilding The frontage of the Property Will be pedestrian friendly and Will Include landscapIng, Sidewalks and an enhanced walking area The proposed bUilding uses numerous relief des~tgo_technlques to create a ~::'~~~~'~~II~::thetlcaIIY p'easrlno~'Eg(;C~~S'~ltnD=-the Beach by DeSign, :1 nU JUl I 920114 I ~- I I PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES r.lTY OF f:ll=r\RWATER .. JOHNSON, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, LLP ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLOR.'> A I LAW July 19, 2004 Page 4 Scale: The Issue regarding heIght IS whether or not the Project, as a fourpstory bUilding above minimum floor elevation, meets the definition as a "mld-nse bUilding" We beheve It does As you know the Staff with the support of the Board has used La Rlsa I, due west from thiS Project, as the benchmark for a mld-nse heIght at 70 feet above FEMA ThiS Project IS barely 51 feet over FEMA Additionally, at the westerly end of Somerset there IS an approved redevelopment condominium project (15-17 Somerset) which IS five stones over parking (62 feet), and determined by the Board to be a "mld-nse" Also, at Chalets of White Sands, the height IS five stones over parking (56 feet) and was determined by the Board to be an acceptable mld-nse Therefore, we believe thiS Project IS well wIthin the height recommendations of a mld-nse bUilding In the Old Flonda Dlstnct of Beach by Design The Applicant respectfully requests that the Request set forth above be permitted and approved by the City In accordance with the Site Plan submitted Yours very truly, JOHNSON, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, LLP #323942 v1 - Radcliffe Lansall Presentahon o ~~~~~~ ~I PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF CLEARWATER ... . , ~ I~" '~ LL In~C'-" < ,ii'I':\ ~- O.l:,. ~IJ II ..;.. -{.;,...; ~:;~ ':'i le:arwater ~ - '" III I-==- u FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 s. MYRTLE AVE., 2nd Floor CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO. Troy fJ~&4rJ1/ FAX: Lib 2-- (JU bJ . Ph6He: FROM: 1'1/ 'l.;_ J1.e, AH1/f Phone: J6 '- -- y,P3 ~ DATE: '7--/ J ---tlV SUBJECT: ~ 2o()V~ 1?3 DfcP" ~6 1 {Mer &/~#L.- MESSAGE: ~ (/.L.i!- ~ 4~ ~ (~..r-/ ~t? d/9 NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) 7 CDB Meetmg Date' Case Number Agenda Item ApplIcant' Address, Julv 20, 2004 FLD2004-030 18 E7 RadclIffe Development Company, LLC 669 Bay Esplanade ORIGINAL t ." t~ CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: FlexIble Development approval to penrut attached dwellmgs WIth (1) a reductJ.on of the nummum lot area from 10,000 square feet to 6,479 square feet, (2) a reductJ.on of IDlmmum lot Width from 100 feet to 60 feet; (3) a reductJ.on of the front setback from 15 feet to SIX feet (to pavement), (4) a reductJ.on of the Side (south) setback from 10 feet to zero feet to wooden walkway, (5) a reductIOn of the stde (north) setback from 10 feet to eight feet (to bwldmg), (6) a reductJ.on of the rear setback from 20 feet to 10 feet (to deck), and (7) a bUIldmg heIght mcrease from 35 feet to 51 83 feet from FEMA to mIdpomt of the roof under the provIsIOns of SectIOn 2- 803 B. EXISTING ZONING! LAND USE: Tounst (T) DIStnCt; Resort FacIlIues HIgh (RFH) Category PROPERTY SIZE: o 148 acres, 6,479 square feet PROPERTY USE: Current Use. Apartments (8 umts) Proposed Use Multl-fanuly resldentJ.al (4 uruts) ADJACENT ZONING! LAND USES: North Tounst DIstnct (T); Overmght accommodatIOns West Tounst DIStnct (T), Overnight accommodatIOns and attached dwellmgs East Clearwater Harbor and Tounst Dlstnct (T), Clearwater Harbor South Tounst Dlstnct (T), Attached dwellIngs CHARACTER OF THE IM1\t1EDIA TE VICINITY: Scemc north-south beach comdor, overnight lodgmg, multl-fanuly resIdentIal, and commerCIal Staff Report - Commumty Development Board - July 20,2004 - Case FLD20Q4-03018 - Page 1 ~ "'.. 1" ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: ThIS 0 148-acre sIte IS located on the east sIde of Bay Esplanade, approXimately 300 feet south of Somerset Street OvernIght accommodatIons and attached dwellIngs dommate the nnmedlate vlcmtty to the west, south, and north By Code, the allowable densIty on thIS SIte IS five hotel umts or four dwellmg umts The Site contams an eXlstmg, smgle-story, elght-umt apartment bUIldmg, WIth back out parkmg on Bay Esplanade. There IS an eXlstmg deck on the east side of the SIte and an eXIstmg walkway from the front of the Site to the rear along the south property line The eXlstmg bUIldIng and ItS parJang area fIt ttghtly onto the site There IS lInuted landscapmg There IS one eXIstIng dock, located at the east Side of the Site, IS proposed to remam by thIS redevelopment request The SIte IS located wlthm the specIal area redevelopment plan, Beach by Deslgn, as part of the "Old Flonda" Dlstnct ThIS area has been deSIgnated for multI-fannly townhomes and condomimums of low to rrudnse The Inllnernate vlcImty IS almost entIfely composed of attached dwellIngs and small motels BUIldmg styles generally resemble archItecture from the 1950's and appear to have been progressIvely expanded Bay Esplanade, m thIS general vlclmty, IS a local street WIth no SIdewalks where many SItes rely on the public nght-of-way to accommodate perpendIcular, back-out parkmg Generally, the streetscape IS m need of redevelopment to Improve parkmg, pedestnan access, and Its aesthetIc appearance Beach by Deslgn recognIzes SIte constramts of parcels III the neIghborhood and difficultIes of redevelopment Proposal: The proposal IS to completely raze the eXlstmg apartments and construct four attached dwellings ("La RIsa II") The applIcatIon IS seek.mg approval of the use, lot SIze and WIdth reductIOns, setback reductIOns, plus an Increase III height. The proposal shows SIX on-SIte parJang spaces at ground level The bUIldmg IS proposed to be four stones above parJang and reach to 51 83 feet from a FEMA bUIldmg lIne to roof ITIldpomt. ThIS Site IS located wlthm a flood zone (Zone AE) WIth an elevation of 11 feet. The bUIldmg elevatIons show four stones WIth a rooftop terrace over parJang. There IS an elevator overrun tower extendmg over the roof terrace The deSIgn of the bUIldmg mcludes arched stylIng WIth some of the doorways and wmdows Large wmdows are show on the east elevatIOn, With VIews of Clearwater Harbor The plans show the bUlldmgs to have a beige color stucco fimsh With a red-brown color roof. Wmdows are proposed to have alummum frannng with a precast stone look tnm The roof IS shown to have a clay tile ITIlSSIOn shape. Wrought Ifon raIlmgs Will be attached to walkways and platforms outSIde the bUIldmg on five levels The north and west elevatIOns show a decoratIve architectural medalhon on the north and west Sides of the elevator tower Extenor statrs are shown on the north elevatIon, from the ground level to the roof. Wmdows and doors proposed on the north and south elevatIOns do not meet BUlldmg Code The setbacks as proposed lInnt the use of wmdows and doors to 10 percent of the bUlldmg fagade VehIcular and pedestnan safety would be Improved, as there WIll no longer be any back out parkmg onto Bay Esplanade A wooden walkway IS proposed along the south SIde of the property for access to the rear deck and dock Five cabanas and a rest room are shown on the SIte plan at Staff Report - Cornmumty Development Board - July 20,2004 - Case FLD2004-030l8 - Page 2 , ~ ' the rear of the site The deck and dock amemty IS proposed to be shared wIth residents of a residentIal development across the street to the west, (La Rlsa I) Trash collectIon IS proposed to be made from a solId waste dumpster located mSIde the bUIldmg at the front (west Side) of the Site The dumpster IS to be rolled out by complex. matntenance to a stagmg area. Whtle there IS a landscape plan, the proposed setbacks reduce the opportumty for green space A sIx-foot hIgh opaque fence IS proposed along the south SIde of the property PrelImmary stonnwater deSIgn has been addressed The deSIgn IS essentIally complete Beach by Deslgn does not speCIfically suggest the development as proposed by thIS appltcatlOn Beach by Deslgn reads m part, <c. .the scale and mtensIty of the area, WIth relatIvely few exceptlOns, IS substantIally less than comparable areas to the south." The document contemplates "lnruted new constructIon where renovatIon IS not practIcal" What IS proposed IS a substantIal mcrease In scale to what eXIsts wIthm the Old Flonda DIStnCt The development IS not VIsually mterestmg and the massmg and scale do not comply WIth the tntended character of the "Old Flonda DIstnct" and Beach by Desrgn. The applIcatIOn proposes to maxlll11Ze the allowable densIty and IS seekmg seven vanatIons from the Code to make thIS project work (reductlOns m lot SIze, Width, setbacks, and an Increase m bUIldmg heIght) The proposed use IS acceptable, but the overall scale 15 not compatIble WIth the eXIstmg surroundmg land uses The proposed reductlOn In lot area WIll result In a bUIldmg, whIch IS out of scale WIth eXIstmg bmldmgs III the nnmedlate VIClllIty of the parcel proposed for development. The proposed 10creased In heIght does not result In an Improved SIte plan or Improved deSIgn and appearance The proposed reductions 10 SIde setbacks do not result In an Improved SIte plan, more effICIent parkmg or Improved deSIgn and appearance Development of the land, as proposed, WIll not be In harmony WIth the scale, bulk, coverage, densIty and character of adjacent propertIes DeSIgn of the propDsed development does not mmlITllZe VIsual adverse Impacts on adjacent propertIes. CODE ENFORCEMENT ANALYSIS: There are no outstandmg enforcement Issues assOCIated wIth thIS site. Staff Report - Commumty Development Board - July 20, 2004 - Case FLD2004-030 18 - Page 3 STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: (Section 2-301.1 and 2.304): STANDARD PROPOSED CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT MAXIMUM Four dwellmg umts X DENSITY (maximum of four dwelling units vermitted) IMPERVIOUS 075 X SURFACE RA TIO (ISR) (maximum ISR is .95) LOT AREA (10,000 o 148 acres; 6,479 square feet X* square feet is minimum requirement) LOT WIDTH (100 60 feet at nearest pomt X* feet minimum required) FRONT SETBACK SIX feet at closest pomt (to pavement) X* (35 feet mmimum required) REAR SETBACK (20 10 feet (to deck) X* feet . . DllDlmum requirement) SIDE SETBACK (10 North eIght feet X* feet . . South: zero feet to walkway DllDlmum requirement) HEIGHT (35 - 100 51 83 feet X* feet allowable FLD ran l!e) PARKING SPACES SIX spaces, 1.5 spaces per umt X (1.5 per unit required) * See analysIs above for diSCUSSIOn Staff Report - Commumty Development Board - July 20, 2004 - Case FLD2004-030 18 - Page 4 FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA (Section 2-803.B) applicable to lot area and width, building h'b d b k elgl t an set ac s: Consistent Inconsistent 1 The reductIOn In lot area will not result III a bmldmg, which IS out of scale wIth eXlstmg bmldmgs m the Immedtate VICInIty of the parcel [Xl proposed for development 2 The use of the parcel proposed for development wIll not mvolve dIrect [X] access to an artenal street 3 The mcreased height results m an Improved Site plan or Improved [ ] [X] deSign and appearance 4 The mcreased height IS necessary to allow the Improvement of off- [Xl [ l street parktng on the ground floor of the reSidential bUlldmg 5. The reductIon m side setback does not prevent access to the rear of [ ] [X] any bUlldmg by emergency vehicles. 6 The reduction III sIde setback results m an Improved SIte plan, more [ ] [X] effiCient parkmg or Improved deSign and appearance. GENERAL STANDARDS (Section 3-913): Consistent Inconsistent 1. Development of the land will be m harmony With the scale, bulk, [ ] [X] COverage. denSity and character of adlacent propertIes 2 Development will not hmder or dtscourage development and use of [Xl [ 1 adjacent land and bmldtngs or slgmficantly Impalf the value thereof. 3 Development wIll not adversely affect the health or safety of persons [X] [ ] resIdtng or workmg m the neighborhood 4 Development IS deSigned to mmlllnze traffic congestlOn [Xl [ ] 5 Development IS conSIstent With the commumty character of the [ ] [Xl nnmedtate vlclmty. 6 DeSIgn of the proposed development mIllUTI1ZeS adverse effects, [ ] [X] mcludmg vIsual, acoustIc and olfactory and hours of operatIon Impacts on adlacent propertIes Staff Report _ CommuOlty Development Board - July 20, 2004 - Case FLD2004-030 18 - Page 5 SUMMARY AND RECOMlVIENDATION: The Development RevIew Comrmttee revIewed the applIcatIon and supportmg matenals at Its meetmgs on May 6, 2004 and June 10, 2004 The Plannmg Department recommends DENIAL of the FlexIble Development applIcatIOn to develop four reSIdential attached dwellmg umts on (1) a 6,479 square foot lot (10,000 square feet IS reqUired), WIth (2) a nummum lot wIdth of 60 feet (100 feet IS requIred), seekmg (3) a reductIOn m the front setback from 15 feet to SIX feet to pavement, (4) a reductIon m the sIde (south) setback from 10 feet to zero feet to wooden deck walkway, (5) a reduction of the sIde (north) setback from 10 feet to eight feet (to bUIldmg), (6) a reductlOn of the rear setback from 20 feet to 10 feet to wooden deck, and (7) a bUIldmg height mcrease from 35 feet to 51 83 feet from FEMA to roof lTIJdpomt under the proVIsIons of Section 2-803 B Bases for Demal' 1 The proposal does not comply WIth the fleXIble Development cntena per SectIOn 2-803 B 2. The proposal IS not m complIance WIth other standards m the Code Includmg the General ApphcabIhty Cntena per SectIOn 3-913 3 The development IS not compatIble WIth the surroundmg area and wIll not enhance other redevelopment efforts In the VIcImty of the SIte locatIOn. 4 The proposed development IS mconsIstent WIth what IS proposed wIthm Beach by DeSign for property wIthm the Old Flonda DIstnct Prepared by Planmng Department Staff hs/~#l. ~ MIchael H Reynolds, AICP, Planner III ATTACHMENTS Aenal Photograph of SIte and VIcImty Location Map Future Land Use Map Zonmg Atlas Map ApplIcation S \Planning Departmenf\C D 8\FLEJ0Pendlng cases\Up for the next CDB\Bay Eoplanade 669 La Rlsa If (Tjl.Bay Esplanade 669 Staff Report doc Slaff Report - Community Development Board - July 20, 2004 - Cdse FLD2004-030 18 - Page 6 . . , SEi'1D It lG REPOFn Jul 15 2004 04:15PM YOUR LOGO YOUR FRX NO Clt~OfClearwater-Plan Dept 727 552 4855 NO. OTHER FRCSIMILE 01 94620365 STRRT TIME USRGE TIME MODE PRGES RESULT Jul.150413PM 02'47 SND 07 OK TO TIJRN OFF RfflORT, PRESS 'MENU' 1:*04. THEN SELECT OFF BY US lNG' +. OR '-'. FOR FRX RDVAHTAGE F=lSSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FRX (435-7329) v : Clearwater ,..., "'- TO: FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARrfMENT 100 S. lVIYR'TLE A VE., 2nd Floor CLEARW A TER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 dQ~ H el ev/ e.b~ r L/{Jr{ 1-~70d-.5a,~- ;[sgqq /OIO(P-7;}.;J, 3 / J . FAX: Phone: }'ROM: Phone: DATE: SUBJECT: i\'IESSAGE:->>RC!.... 0~omf"Y1e~ NLii\H~LR OF P.\GFStINCLUDING 'I HIS p<\Gr) S 2:45 pm Case Number. FLD2004~0411L6 - 850 BA YW A Y BLVD '-j --" Applicant Decade Propertle<; Ine NI9 W24]30 Rlvenvood Or#IOO Waukesha, W] 53]88 TELEPHONE No Phone, FAX No Fax, E-MAIL No EmalI Jeff Ke1Cr]eber 240 BaY~lde Dnve Clearwater, F] 33767 TELEPHONE 727-46]-2921, FAX 262-522-8999, E-MAIL No Emat] Owner(s): \ LocatIOn: North SIde of Bayway Boulevard, approxlmate]y 600 feet east ofthe mtersectlon of Gulf Boulevard Atlas Page: 285B Zomng Distnct. r, Toun~t Request: Comprehen~lve Intill Redevelopment Approval for 15 attached resIdential umb dnd SIX ~U1te~ (mIxed use development) \'11th a bU1ldmg heIght of90 feet (above the FEMA hne) plu<; roofappurtunences Proposed Use: M]xed use Neighborhood No NeIghborhood A~~ocatlOn Data Assoclahon(s): Presenter: MIke Reynold~, SeDlor Planner Attendees Included: The DRe revIewed thiS apphcatlOn With the followmg comments: General Engmeenng' 1) No back out parkmg onto Bayway Blvd ArchItectural pavement 1S to be used for pedestnan traffic only - no motonzed veh1c1es 2) ArchItecture plans show the "archItectural pavement" bemg mstalled to the baek-of-curb and the clv]1 plans ~how It to the face of the proposed 5' SIdewalk? 3) Need to show eXI~tmg 2" ga<; mam along Bayway Blvd 4) Need to mstall a FHA to fight a fire 5) Need to mstall a FHA wlthm 40-45 ft from proposed F D C connectton 6) Need to m~taIl gate valves on both sIdes ofthe B F P D 7) Need to show how Sohd Waste ]S bemg handled 8) If apphcable, need to ~how <;tagmg area 9) Need to ~how where the crane IS gomg to be placed for the constructIOn of the proposed s tru ctu re fhe above to be addressed pnor to CDB Pnor to the FlfSt CO 1) CondommlUm plat to be recorded WIth Pmella<; County Envl ronmenta I. Provlde water quahty treatment pnor to dIscharge Fire' Development RevIew Agenda - Thur<;day, June 10,2004 - Page 38 " ***PLEASE NO I C *** REYIEW AND APPROY AL BY I HE Au I HORI I Y HA YING JURISD]CTION SHALL NOT RELEIYE THE APPLICANT OF THE RESPONSIBILITY OF COMPLIANCE WlTH THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE 200] EDITION 2 ProvIde a fire hydrant on the same sIde ofthe street and wlthln 300 feet of the most remote pOint of the bUlldlllg for firefightmg purposes PRIOR TO CDS 3 Show FDC at least 15 feet from the bUl]dmg dnd wlthm 40 feet of a fire Hydrant dedicated to the Fire Sprinkler Sy~tem (.It led~t two fHA d<,<,cmbhe~ req) PRIOR TO COB 4 Where underground water maln~ and hydrant<; are to be Installed, they shall be Installed, comp leted, and In serVI ee pn or to constructIon as per NFP A 241 Please acknowledge P R lOR TO CDS 5 Plans submItted for Fire RevIew mu~t reflect ddherence to Flonda FIre PreventIOn Code, 200] EditIOn and the following Codes NFPA 101,2000 EdltlOn, NFPA 70, 1999 EdItIOn and Flondd Stdtute 633 Show on a Code Reference Sheet 6 HIgh-me <;tructures reqUIre full fire protectIOn systems mcludlng, but not hmlted to, a fire pump and a generator If fire pump IS electnc, and be designed to meet the mInimum reqUIrements for fire alarm eqUIpped With vOice eVdcudtlon & fire fighter two-way commumcatlOn, .I Central Control StatIOn, pressunzed stamvells, stamvell marking as per the F10nda Flfe Prevention Code-200 I EdItIOn and NFP A 101 Life Safety Code 2000 Edltlon Stairway IdentificatIOn shall be designated by the side of the structure the stairway IS located on by the words "ALPHA" for the address side ofthe structure The other sides Identified clockwise as "BRA YO", "DELTA" and "CHARLIE" If located In the comer of .I structure the ~tdlrwdY ~hdn be IdentIfied by the two ~Ide& thdt mter<;ect I c "ALPHA / SRA YO" PRIOR TO BLDG PERMIT 7 Clearances of 7 Y2 feet In front of and to the sIdes of the fire hydrant, With a 4 foot clearance to the rear of the hydrant .Ire reqUIred to be maintained as per NFP AI, Sec 3-5 6 Please acknowledge PRIOR TO SLOG PERMIT 8 ProvIde drawmgs that have been prepared by or under the directIOn of an Engineer regIstered under F S Chdptcr 471 for all firc spnnkler systems as pcr Flonda BUIlding Code, 2001 EdItIOn, Sec ] 04 4 ] 3 DraWings shall be Signed and sealed by a ProfeSSIOnal Engineer as per F S 47] 025 The In~tdl I atlOn shall be I n accordance WIth NFP A 13, 1999 EdltJon by a hcensed Fire Spnnkler Contractor under scparate permIt WIth draWings Please aeknowledgc PRIOR TO SLOG PERMIT 9 Provldc draWings that have been prepared by or underthe dlrectlOn of an Engmeer regIstered under Chapter 471 F10nda Statutes for the FIre Alam System as per Frondd BUlldmg Code 2001 EdItIOn, SectIOn 1044 I 3 (5) Drawmgs ~hdll be Signed and seah:d by a Profe~~lOn.I1 Engineer as per 471 025 Flonda St.Itutes PRIOR TO BLDG PERMIT 10 FIre Aldrm Sy~tem m<;tdlldtlOn must be In accordance WIth NFP A 72, 1999 EdItIOn by a hcen<;ed Flrc Alarm Contractor under separate plans and permlt PRIOR TO BLOG PERM]T 11 Flfe Department ConnectlOns &hdll be Identlficd by .I ~Ign thdt <,tdte<, "No Pdrkmg, FIre Department ConnectIOn" and shall be deSigned m accordance Wlth Flonda Department of TransportatIOn standards for mformatlOn slgnage and be maintained With a clearance of 7 Y2 feet m front of dnd to the slde~ of .Ipphance As per Flond.I fIre PreventlOn Code, 2001 EditIOn, mothficdhon to SeOlOn 3-5 fi ofNFPA I Plea<;e acknowledge mtent to comply PRIOR TO BLDG PERMIT 12 I nstall a Knox Key Box for emergency ac{.css as pcr NFP A 1, Sce 3 -6 dnd I nstdll pnor to bUIldmg find] inspectIOn Please acknowledge 13 Cloud all reVISIOns 14 ProvIde a StandpIpe water ~upply WIth 2 1/2 Inch connectIOn & 1 1/2 mch adaptor With breakablc cover and cham wlthm 100 feet of any Plerlland mtersectlOn As per NFPA 303, Fife ProtectIon Stdnddrd tor M.Innas and Boat yards, SectIOn 434 PRIOR TO COB 15 All requirements ofNFP A 303, fife ProtectIOn Standard for Manna<; and Boatyard<; mu~t be met PRIOR TO SLOG PERMIT 16 PrOVIde portable Fife ExtmgUlshers hsted for Class A, Class B and Class C fires thdt meet the requlfement<, ofNFP A 10, mu<;t be Installed at the pier/land mtersectlOn AddltlOnal Fife ExtmgUlshers must be pldccd on the dod so th.It the mdXlmum trdvel dl<;tance \0 an ExtmgLll<;her doe~ not exceed 75 feet As per NFP A 303, Fife ProtectIOn Stdndard for MdnndS dnd BoatYdrd~, Section 4 2 2 ] Harbor Master. No ReVIew Performed J '. Development RevlCW Agenda - Thursday, June 10 2004 - Page 39 '''" 't Legal No Rev1Cw Performed Land Resources: J f a water q uahty pond IS to be mstalled, recommend placmg It at the ea!:.t ~Ide of the butldmg to avoid the pme trees at the west side Landscapmg. 1 The color site plan and elevatIOn draw1ng~ depIct a lu~h ]aIld~cape de!:.1gn where the wbmltted landf>cape plan IS much less elaborate There are hmlted plant<; on sheet 9 of 10 RevI<;e either to match the other makmg them COnf>lf>tent, preferably match the plan to the rendenng For a project of thiS magmtude the lush land~cap1ng will only add to thc curb appcal and valuc of the umts Submit pnor to or at ORC meetmg 2 Per SectIOn 3- I 204 0 all landf>capmg must be protectcd from vehICular and pedestnan tra ffic by the m~tal1atlOn of curbmg and wheel stops, or other protective deVices along the pen meter of any landscapmg which adJoms vehicular use areas and Sidewalks These protective deVices shall have a mmlmum height of SIX mches above grade -. " 3 JmgatlOn mu<;t meet the City Code per SectIOn 3-1203 C, submit plans pnor to COB to show 100% coverage, ram sensor, automatIc hmer, etc 4 Per SectIOn 3-1202 E 1 Code reqUIres a mlmmum of 10% 'mtenor green space of gross vehIcular use area or 12% 0 f gross vehicular use area If parkmg spaces area greater than 110% ofthe reqUIred parkmg Intcnor Islands shall be deSIgned so that 10 most cases no more than 10 parkmg spaces are provided m a row Intenor Island~ ~hall be a mm]mum of 150 ~q ft, and be 8' of green space from back of curb to back of eurb ** The parkmg IS under the bUlldmg (mtemal) and ]S therefore excmpt from thl<; reqUIrement The plan mdlcates 11% mtenor land<;capmg? Could not find on plan Remove the "Intenor Landscape CalculatIOns" provided from the plan Parks and Recreation' Open Space and RecreatIOn Impact Fees are due pnor to IS<;llance ofbUlldmg permlt<; Plea<;e contact Deb Richter at 727-562-4817 Stormwatcr. I The site IS exempt from storm water attenuation and only haf> to provIde water quahty retentIon Pnor to COB thiS area should be <;hown on the <;Ite plan 2 Pnor to bUlldmg permit a copy of the approved SWFWMD permlt IS to be provided Solid Waste: No Revlew Performed Traffic Engmeerlng I I Reduce eurb cuts from 3 (three) to 2 (two) to comply with the mlmmum ~pacmg reqUlrement~ of 125' between dnveways (SectIOn 3-102 C 3) 2 Show locatIOn for gatc console If any Place console where a passenger car can access It without havmg any part of the vehicle mtrudmg on the through Sldewdlk and e~peC1ally the roadway 3 ProVIde an accessible Pdth from bUlldmg'~ entrance to a pubhc Sidewalk (Flonda Accesslblhty Code for BUlldmg Con~tructlon Chapter 11 SectIOn I J -4 3 2) 4 Objects wlthm the sight distance tnangles must not exceed 30" lD height from the pavement Remove parkmg space deSignated a~ d IOddmg zone which Will prevent vehICle from backmg out blindly mto the throat of the dnvcway 5 All of the above to be addressed pnor to COB Traffic Impact Fee to be detennmed dnd paid pnor to C 0 Plannmg Development ReVieW Agenda - rhursddY June 10,2004 - Pdge 40 I' ~ I 2 3 Need narrative :;.tau;;ment of comphance wJth Beach by DesIgn Apphcant nced~ to fill out ComprehensIve Infill Redevelopment dpphcatlOn form State the propo&ed slgnage Any slgnage wIll nccd to fol low Codc and be I ntegrated to the sIte and bUl Idmg Combine the plan sets to one plan ~et SubmIt a traffic study or get ~Ign off from Engmeenng On the apphcatlOn form, dCdrly "tate any and all reasons for the ComprehensIve Infill Redevelopment request What doe~ not mcct code? SIte Plan I The scale ofthl" proJcct II;. to bIg (too hIgh and too wIde) 2 RcvI~e thc mdex sheet after assembly to one plan sct 3 Need color landscape plan 4 DemohtlOn Plan and SltC Plan need to show clear bU1ldmg footpnnts 5 DImensIOn out all sctbdck:;. mcludmg to pavement 6 Improve the locatIOn map 7 Identify all envuonmcnta1Jy umque areas 8 Locate all easement~ 9 Locate/ldbel dll utlhtres, mcludmg hydrant" 10 Solod waste areas need to be &hown (label) II Label all outdoor lIghtmg 12 Propo&e sIdewalks and dlmenslOn them 13 Label all setback~ wIth dlmcnSlondl drrows Organize plan notes to one sIte data table SIte Data Table 1 State the requued number of parkmg spdces 2 Statc OffiCIal Records Book and Page Numbers for dll utthty easements 3 BU1ldmg hClght needs to be stated from BFE to mldpomt ofthe roof, both wlthm the sIte data table and on the bU1ldmg c1evatlOn" 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Color bU1ldmg e1evdtlOns, wIth dlmenslOns show from BFE to roofmldpomt (u<,e dImenSIOnal arrows) need to be proVIded for each elevdtlOn Label the elevatlOn for edch sheet Other- No Commenh Notes: Development RevIew Agenda - rhursday, June 10 2004 - Page 41 3:15 pm Case Number FLD2004-04028 -- 107 MCMULLEN BOOTH Owner(s): Thoma~ Kelly ]07 N Mcmullen Booth Rd Clearwater, FI 33759 TELEPHONE No Phone, FAX No Fax, [-MAIL No Emall Applicant Patnck Hlckcy 1775 Spltt Fork Dr Oldsmar, FI 34677 TELEPHONE 813-818-7366, FAX No Fax, F-MAIL No Ematl Reprcsentatlve Keith Zayac 101 Phll!tppe Parkway Safety Harbor, Fl 34695 TELEPHONE 727-793-9888, FAX 727-793-9855, E-MAIL KEITHZA Y AC@AOLCOM LocatIOn: West side of McMullen Booth Road, dpproxlmately 50 feet south of Bay Lane dnd approximately 140 feet north of Featherwood Court Atlas Page' 292A Zomng Dlstnct: 0, Office Request: Comprehensive Infili Redevelopment approvdl to convert a smgle family reSldentldl structure to an 840 square foot office bUll dmg Proposed Use: Offices Neighborhood No NeIghborhood AssocatlOn Data AssocmtlOn( s): Presenter Mike Reynolds, Sentor Planner Attendees Included. The DRC reviewed thiS applicatIOn with the followmg comments: Gcneral Engineermg. I 1) Need a note statmg "core eXIstmg manhole at elevation 24 54" on Featherwood Clrde for ~dmtdry ~ewer connectIOn The above to be addressed pnor to CDS Envl ronmental: ProVide eross sections ofpand, ~]ope data and SHWT Fire: A FIre InspectIOn mu!>t be called for and passed pnor to oceupan(,y of the bUlIdmg Harbor Mastcr: No ReView Performed Legal' No ReView Perfonned Land Resources' 1 No Issues Landscaping: I PI dn doc,> not meet the reqUl rements of penmeter plantmgs In Code Section 1-] 202 0 2 ImgatlOn must meet the City Code per SectIOn 3-] 203 C , submit plans to show] 00% coverage, ram sensor, automatK tImer, cte 3 Per Section 3-1202 E 1 Code reqUIres a mmlmum of] 0% mtenor green spdce of gross vehicular use area or 12% of gross vehICular u<,e drCd If pdrk1l1g spaces area greater than 110% ofrhc reqUIred parkmg Intenor Islands shall be deSigned so that m most (,dse~ no more than 10 Pdrkmg ~pdces are proVided m a row Intenor Islands shall bc d mmUTIum of 150 sq ft, and be 8' of green space from back of curb to baek of curb Plan has the "penmeter" landscapmg adjacent to the parkmg area, move to the penmctcr dnd m~tal\ d tiered effect With the lowcr pI ant on the mten or !>Ide of the sIte Use of Podocarpus and ASIatiC J3 ~ml nc or Sl mlldr pldnts would crcate thl~ step effect In the SE comer of the parkmg undcr thc ("MA") "MG", mstall Philodendron or SimIlar accent pldnt~ to count towards thc mtenor Submit tor Comprehenslvc lJnd~cJpe PIJn to reduce the reqUIred mtenor to reflcct what 1<; aV31IJble The Jrea along the f,outh Side of the parkmg lot IS not mtenor to the parkmg ~llrface dl1d doe& not qualt fy as mtenor land!>('dplIlg The only drea shown that counts IS the Island creatcd at the SE comer ofthe site 4 In the SE corner of the parkmg the ("MA") "MG" appear to be the same Item, plea<;e revise plant lIst or tag to mdlcate the ."amc code Development ReView Agenda - Thursday, Junc 10,2004 - Page 42 P.:arks and RecreatIOn' No RevlCw Performed Stormwater. Pnor to bUlldmg permit you need to provide a copy of approved SWFWMD pcrmlt 2 No Issue,> Solid Wa!>te. No RevIew Performed Trame Engmeenng: I I The City'S Commumty Development Code designates thl<; <;ealOn of McMullcn Booth to be an "Access Class 3", a!> a result the dnvcway~ dre to be spaced greater than 460' (City'~ Commumty Development Code SectIOn 3-102C 1 3) However, the City Will conSider a "hdred dnveway with Ib adjacent neighbor This would bnng thc proposed dnveway 1D par with the surroundmg dnveways that are <;paced at 250'+/- apart 2 Dnveway and dnve aisle must be 24' wide At the bUlldmg, the drive aisle IS only 12' m Width 3 The driveway return md1U!> must be a mmlmum of28' 4 All parkmg spaces must comply wIth current city standards 1 e 9' Wide x 19' long 5 PrOVide an accessIble path from butldmg's entrance to a public Sidewalk (Flonda Aeecs~lbr1lty Code for BUlldmg ConstructIOn Chapter II SectIOn 1]-432) 6 Necd a nght of way permit from Pmdlas County for the dnveway along MGMullen Booth 7 Provide a currcnt city standard handicap parkmg stall and handIcap slgnage dctall on the ;"Ite plan 8 Landscapmg wlthm the "Ight distance tnang!c" mu~t not exceed 30" m height from the pavement 9 All parkmg '>paees must be paved (Commumty Development Code Section 3-1403) 10 All of the above to be addre,>sed pnor to COB fraffic Impact Fec to be accessed and paid pnor to C 0 Plannmg' Development ReView Agenda - Thunday, June lO, 2004 - Page 43 2 3 I The apphcatlOn tonn IS not completcly filled out Property owncn. arc not hsted ComprehensIve Infill Redevelopmcnt Cntefla I~ Illeomplete Parklllg IS reqmred to be on a hard ~urface Grass parklllg IS not acccptable The Sltc plan need~ to clearly mdlcate the [unctIOn of the bmldlllg to remain Whcre]s the pedcstfla!l access? The proposcd bUilding elcvattons appear to be conccptual I he bUlldmg deslgnl~ plam Color elevatIOns are needed Improve the archltecural detail Where IS the handicap acce~~? Show bUilding height both on the elevations and wlthlll the site data table on the ~Ite plan To say "1 story" ]~ !lot acceptable On thc elevatIOns, ~how height with dimenSIOnal arrows from BFE to the m]dpolllt of the roof S]tc data table state the reqUired number ofparkmg spaces Site Plan 1 Consolidate general notes and ~lte data table to one site data table 2 Corrcct the Side setback reqUired d]~ta!lce to read 20 fect \1l]ll1mU\1l 3 Improve the locatIOn map, so that It ]s clear and readablc 4 Label VISllblhty tnanglcs with dimenSIOns 5 State any cnvlromnentally ulllque areas 6 Locate any easements 7 Label all utlhtIC~, mcludmg fire hydrants 8 Stablhzed grass parkmg needs to be removed a~ proposed on the drawlllg and as an mformatlOnal class wlthm the site data table 9 Arc there any wetlands herc? 10 Label all outdoor Ilghtlllg I I Thc Sl te needs to mcl ude a sldewal k to prOVIde safe mean~ of pedestnan acccss from the parkmg lot to the office bUlldmg Site Data Table I Reference the cXlstmg resldentlal dwelhng umt and Its size m square feet 2 State the FAR requlfcment/hmltatton 3 Corrcct the parkmg lllformatlOn 4 OffiCial Book and Page numbers need to be stated for all utIhty easements 5 Need to statc propo~ed bUlldmg height Any slgnage proposed Will need to meet Code and be archItecturally mtcgrated to the sIte and bUlldlllg ProVIde a color landscape plan Submit the ComprehensIve SIgn Program apphcatlOn and fcc, with all r~qUlred attachments 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 I I Other' No Comments Notes. Developmcnt Rcv!Cw Agenda - Thursday, June 10, 2004 - Pagc 44 3:45 pm Case Number: FLD2004-0301 8 -- 669 SAY ESPLANADE Owner(s): Virginia B Franks 669 Bay Esplanade Clearwater, F] 33767 TELEPHONE No Phone, FAX No Fax, E-MAIL No Emal] Applicant RadclIffe Development 2424 Curlew Rd J Clearwatcr, FI 33683 TELEPHONE 727-785-4070, FAX 727-784-0096, E-MAIL No Ematl Representative KeIth Zayac 101 Phl]!Jppe Parkway Safcty Harbor, F] 34695 TELEPHONE 727-793-9888, FAX 727-793-9855, E-MAIL KE]THZA Y AC@AOL COM LocatIOn: 0 154 acres located on the east "Ide of Ba y Esplanade approxlmatc] y 300 feet south of Somerset Street Atlas Page' 258A Zomng DlStnct: T, Toufl~t Request: F]exlble Development approval to permIt attached dwe]hngs WIth a reductIOn to the mllllmum lot area from 10,000 "quare feet to 6,479 square feet, a reductIOn to the mllllmum lot WIdth from 100 feet to 60 feet, a reductIOn to the front ('louth) setback from 15 feet to one foot (to pavement), a reduchon to the SIde (north) ~etback from 10 feet to zero feet (to pavement) and a reductIOn to the rear setback from 20 feet to SIX feet to 6 19 feet to be a patIO and WIth an mcrea'le to buildmg heIght from 35 feet to 67 feet (to elevator overrun), under the provlSlon~ of SectIOn 2-803 Proposed Use' Attached dwe]hngs NClghborhood Clearwater Beach ASSOCIation Assocl3tlOn(s): Clearwater, F] 33767 827 Manda]ay Ave TELEPHONE 727-446-5801, FAX No Fax, E-MAIL dmacnav@att net Presenter. MIke Reynolds, Semor Planner Attendees Included MIke Reyno]d'l, ChIp Gerlock, Scott RIce The DRC revlcwed thiS applicatIOn With the followmg comments: General Engmeenng: Development ReView Agcnda - Thursday, June 10, 2004 ~ Page 45 Comments from second submIttal For June 10,2004 0 R C I) The fire service pi pel me to the proposed stdnd pi pe can not be msta lied on a restncted I mc 2) FIre scrvlce Ime for the 2-1/2" stand pIpe WI]] need to be 4" m diameter ThIs firc scrvlce Ime should be meluded wIth the health permit to mstall the new water mdm All of the above to be addressed prior to COB Pnor to C 0 I) Condominium plat required Comments from fir~t submIttal I) Need to mstall a 6" samtary sewer "wye" on eXIsting mdm for sanitary sewer servIce No need to construct manholc dS propo~ed MET SEE REVISED PLAN 05/13/04 2) Backlow preventor'for fire service lme will be mstalled by the CIty dnd located on pnvate property at the nght-of-way Imc MET SEE REVISED PLAN 05/13/04 3) CIty WIll provide tap fOf fire Ime and mstall backflow preventor deVIce only All appllcdble fees to be paId for by apphcant MET ACKNOWLEDGED 4) Thc dppllcdnt to mstall fire servlce hne from tappmg sleeve and valve to thc locdtlon of back flow prcventor deVice and from devlce to bUilding MET SEE REVISED PLAN 05/13/04 5) Need to Install one Jomt of ductIle Iron pIpe service SIde of backflow preventor deVIce MET SEE REVISED PLAN 05113/04 6) Gate valves to be Instal led on both SIdes of the backflow preventor device for fire hnc protcctlOn MET SEE REVISED PLAN 05/13/04 7) Need to show F 0 C connectIOn MET SEE REVISED PLAN 05113/04 8) Need to mstall FHA wlthm 40 ft of F DC MET SEE REVISED PLAN 05/13/04 9) SCdle shown I" = 20 ft , the actual scale I~ I" = lOft (Sheet 6 of 9) MET SEE RE VI S ED PLAN 05/13/04 10) Dnve aIsle nccks down to 20 ft should be 24 ft MET SEE REVISED PLAN 05/11/04 I I) Where do guest and servIce utlhty trucb park? MET SEE REVISED PLAN 05/13/04 12) Need to show eXlsttng gas mam WIthin Bay Espldnade's nght-ot-way MET SEE REVISED PLAN 05/13/04 En vim nmentdl Sce stormwater comments Fire Development ReView Agendd - Thursday, June 10, 2004 - Page 46 Show FDC <It least] 5 feet from the bUlldmg and wIthin 40 feet of tm: FIre Hydrant PRIOR TO COB 5/24/04-1_ C fire Department ConnectIOn mu~t be free-standing and not on Double Check Valve Assembly As per NFPA 14, Section 4-3 11 here shall be no shlltofTvalve between the Flrc Dcpartment ConneetlOn and the system 2 Where underground water mam~ and hydrants are to bc mstalled, they shall be In~tallcd, completed, and In servICc pnor to constructIOn a ~ pcr N FP A 241 Pleasc aeknowl edge P RIO R TO COB 5/24/04-1_C Note #8 shown on Utlhty Sheet needs to add the word~ "and hydranl~" 3 Plans submltted for Fire Review must reflect adherence to Flonda Fire PreventlOn Code, 200 I Edmon and the following Codes N FP A ] 01 , 2000 Edl Mn, N FP A 70, I 999 EdltlOn and Flonda Statute 633 Show on a Code Reference Sheet PRIOR TO BLOG PERMIT 4 ProvIde drawings that have been prcpared by or under the dlfectlon of an Engmeer regIstered under F S Chapter 471 for a I I fi re spnnkl er systems as per F10nda BUIlding Code, 200 ] EdItion, Sec 1044 1 3 Drawings shall be sIgned and ~ealed by a Profe~SlOnaJ Engineer as per F S 471 025 The installatIOn ~hall be In accordance with NFP A ] 3, 1999 EditIOn by a licensed Fife Spnnkler Contractor under separate pennlt wIth drawlng~ Please acknowledge PRIOR TO BLDG PERMIT 5 FIre Alann 1n<;lallatron shall be In accordance wIth NFPA 72, 1999 EdItIOn by a hcensed Fife Alann Contractor under <;eparate permIt wIth drawmgs Please acknowledge PRIOR TO BLOG PERMIT 6 FIre Department ConnectIOns shall be Identified by a sIgn thdt states "No Parklllg, FIre Department ConnectIOn" and shall be desIgned III accordance wIth Flonda Department of TransportatlOn standards for Infonn<ltlon slgnage and be mamtalned wIth a clearance of 7 '12 feet In front of and to the sldes of apph<lnce As per Flonda Fire PreventIon Code, 2000 EdltlOn, modIficatIOn to SectIOn 3-56 ofNFPA 1 Please acknowledge mtent to comply PRIOR TO BLDG PERMIT 7 Install a Knox Key Box for emergency access as per N FP AI, Sec 3 -6 and Install pn or to bUlldmg final inspectIOn Please acknowledge Pnor to Bldg Final In~pectlOn 8 ProVIde a wet standpIpe wlth 2 1/2 Inch Inch connection wIth I 1,2 lIlch detachable adaptor connectlQn and cap wIth attached cham, at the rear of the property wIthin 100 feet of the dock connectIOn to land Provide a detaIl of the ~tandplpe on the detaIl sheet Pnor to COB 5/24/04-1_ C StandpIpe deSIgn lllcorrect ThIS I~ the same as a yard hydrant that sllpphe~ water for FIre Department to conneLl to III order to fight a fire on the dock 9 ProVIde portable FIre ExtmgUlshers hsted for Class A, Class B dnd Class C fire~ that meet the reqlllrements of NFP A 10, mu<;t be mstalled at the plCr/land lIltersectron AddJl10nal FIre ExtlngU1sher~ must be placed on the dock so that the maxImum travel dIstance to all ExtmgUl sher does not exceed 75 feet As per N FP A 303, FIre ProtectIon Standard for M <If! nas and Boatyard,>, Section 422 I Please acknowledge PRIOR TO BLDG PERMIT Harbor Master No RCVICW Performed Legal No ReView Perfonned Land Resources. I The tree <;urvey IS Incomplete, revI~e pnor to COB Landscaping. Development ReVieW Agenda - Thur~day, lune 10, 2004 - Page 47 5/28/2004 (A_D) The plans now ~how plants rn the rear along the seawall, howcver there IS no acec~~ path to thc dock Removc an area for access and submIt revised plans 4/2012004 (A_D) The landscape plan does not have allY matenal ~hown on the rear of the buddmg what IS proposed hcre? Show plant~ and trces or palms to be provIded ouhlde of the concrete deck area 2 4/20/2004 (A_D) Per SectIOn 3~ 1204 0 al [ land ~capmg must be protccted from vchl cui af and pedc~tnan traffic by the lIlstallatlOn of curbrng and whcel stops, or other protectlve devICcs d[ong the pemneter of any landscaplllg whIch adJoms vehIcular use areas and sIdewalks The~c protectIve dcvlces ~ha!l have a rrulllmum heIght of SIX lIlchcs above grade ReVIse plans to show the curbmg and submIt for revIew 3 The use ofsprcngem fern IS not recommended as thIs plant IS extremely InVaSIVe, change to another ground cover mdtenal Parks and Recreation. No ReView Performed Stormwater' I No stormwater control system proVIded, all of the fo1!owl11g requlfed pnor to COB except for the seasonal hIgh water level I) 1/2 lIlch water quahty treatment reqUIred per CIty regs (met) 2) ProVide gradlllg detad~ showlllg slte runoff gOlllg through pond for treatment (mct) 3) ProVIde trench dram across dnvcway(met) 4) Pond reqUIred to draw down 1Il 24hrs or less(met) 5) Pond cannot be covered by deck or bUIlding (met) 4) ProVide cross sectlOm for water quahty pond 5) Provldc eVidence of seasonal hIgh watcr for draw down calc~ Solid Waste. I That dumpster ~ervlce be arranged WIth the Sohd Waste Department pnor to the Issuance of an occupatIOnal hcen~e or certIficate of occupancy Please contact Tom Glenn - 727-562-4930 5-20-04 Dumpstcr WIll be roned out by complex maintenance to staging area Traffic Engmeermg I I Objects WIthin thc SIght dIstance tnangles must not cxceed 30" In hClght from thc pavemcnt Remove parking ~pdces obstructing ~Ight vlslblhty tnangles MET 2 All dnve aisles must bc 24' WIde MET 3 Dnvers must not back out blmdly from parkmg space If sohd line on ~Ite plan I~ a ~hear wall then dPphcant must provIde some measures to prevent SIght obstructIOn Show proposcd columns and "hear walls to and demonstrate that they do not encroach mto parking ~paces and that adequate SIght dlstdnces are proVIded MET 4 All of the abovc to be addressed pnor to COB MET "'Traffic Impact Fees of $5,00800 to be paId pflOf to C 0 Apphcant to provldc mformatlOn on the number of Units for apartmcnt bUlldmg 1Il ordcr to receIve TIF Gredlt Planmng: Development ReVIew Agenda ~ Thursday, June] 0, 2004 - Page 48 NOTE [tem~ I thlUugh 10 and the ~eeond Item 2 and <;eeond nem.J <Ire comment~ from the May 6,2004 ORC meetmg ActIOn Agendd I The site plan needs to show all dlmenstons, the footpnnt and size of all proposed bUlkhngs and structure~, label dll ~etbacks, all eXIst10g and proposed aceesswdY~, dll reqUIred site tndngle<;, IdelltrficatJon of envlfonmentally umque area~, locatIOns of all pubhc and pnvate Cdsements all parklllg dnd loadmg space<;, ~ohd waste contalllcr~, outdoor hghtmg, and eXlst10g dnd proposed ~Idewalks 2 RedeSign the sIte to provide 10 foot SIde dnd front setbacks 3 The u<;e of the docks need to be hmlted to the reSIdents of La Rlsa " 4 The site plan does not appear to take Illto account the bulldlllg columns 5 There are too many layers of data on the sIte plan Prcpdre a clearly legIble site plan sheet 6 What I s the WI dth of the outside <;tm rs ? 7 The bUlldlllg floor pldn appears to be IllCOnslstent wIth the sIte plan 8 Why IS there a restroom/shower area lllslde the parklllg ared? 9 Why dre there five cabandS for four resldcntlal Untts? 10 Why are there two sets of stam for each Untt? 2 The site data table needs to <;tate the offiCial records book and page number<; for any utthty easements State both the maximum allowed and propo~ed ISR 3 ProVide bUlldlllg elevatIon drawlllgs m color, ShOWlllg all ')Ides of the bUlldlllgs, with dimensIonal arrows Measure the height from BFE 4 The change<; 10 de~lgn of the parkmg, dlthough much Improved has created the need to eXit the garage area through the dnve Isle to ac(,ess the elevator Suggest you have the "utlhty room" removed and add d doorway to the left of the elevator, thIS W1ll create dn access area from wlthm the parkmg garage 5 The OemohtlOn Plan IS Illegible ProVide a reddable plan shect 6 ProVIde a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment dppltcatlOn fonn, statlllg the upddted requcst(s) ProVide all upddted mformatlOn 7 Site Plan I DimenSIOn all setbacb, Illcludmg to pavement, With dm1eO<;Ional arrows 2 DimenSion the dnveway, WIth dimenSional arrow<; 3 Identlfyall envlfonmentdlly umque areas 4 Locale all edsements 5 Locate all utlllttes, mcludmg hydrants 6 Label all outdoor hghtmg 7 VISIbility tnangle') need dImenSions (use dImensional arrows) 8 ProVide color landscape pldn 9 Consollddte plan notes to one sIte data table 10 SIte Data Table I State the mdXlmum denSIty 2 State Officml Record~ Book and Page Number for dll utIlity ea<;ements 3 BUlldmg heIght necds to be stated from BrE to roofmldpomt II Slgnagc Will need to meet code dnd be mtegrated to site and bUlldmg deSign 12 The request :,hown on thiS agendd Item Will be revised upon the <;ublmttal of an updated dppltcatlOn fonn Other No Comments Notes. Development ReView Agenda - Thur~ddY, June 10, 2004 - Page 49 ,- l/ Keith Zayac & Associates" Inc. CIVIl Engineenng, Landscape Architecture, Planmng fiLE COpy 701 Enterpnse Road E , Ste 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 (727) 793-9888 Phone (727) 793-9855 Fax kelthzayac@aol com TO: Mike Reynolds City of Clearwater Plannmg Department 100 S Myrtle Ave, 2nd Floor Clearwater, FL 33758 DATE: JOB#: RE: June 1,2004 310.04 LaRlsa II WE ARE SENDING YOU THE FOLLOWING ITEMS [x 1 Attached [ ] Shop Drawings [ ] Copy of Letter [ ] Under Separate Cover Via [ ] Prints [ ] Change Order ] Plans ] SpecificatIOns [ ] Samples [ ] See Below COPIES DATE DESCRIPTION 3 Stonnwater CalculatIons (R)~~~r,~,;,7~n u ~='="'l."='>U U ='=" ..-_. JUN V 1 LUU't PlA'~W~:AJU lU~u"ll!\b~ U LOL~~O'd ij errv OF CU:A~~~~~ll~~ THESE ARE TRANSMITTED As Checked Below [ ] For approval [] Reviewed, no comments [ ] For your use [] Reviewed, comments as noted [ ] As requested [] Returned for correctIOns [x ) For review and comment [ ] Resubmit _ copies for approval [ J Submit _ coples for dlstnbutlOn [ 1 Return _ corrected pnnts REMARKS: MIke, please transmit these stormwater calculatIOns to engmeermg With the previously submItted revised gradmg and dramage plans I CC: SIGNED: NAME: TITLE: -0 ..., ~ tTJ (I) ::; '-" w (t:" < a '-" a a a \3 ;:I )> d Al OJ l VJ to c I>> ;:u ::l 0 ..., ~ C? 0.. n (I) "'CI ::l ..., ;::!C I>> 0 ::l '" (I) (]l 0 0 ::;; I>> VJ :3 :3 @ ...,., )> ::::i 0 ~ to ~ ..., -l (ll "'CI "" 2- "" Q 0 ::l if> ::>;- to [2 --\1'" n Al !:e.. (I) .)>. ~ N UJ> ~~ 8 -.l a :::; 0 0 'Tj @ ;;0 (]l a a ;:u co 0- 0 ~ - ~ 0- " -...j \r'- t;1 -< \) ~ Z (I) l "" rt ::E :3 )> ~ ~ t- g N < .)>. UJCIO '-" \N~~ < a 'Tj)> ~ 0 ..., ~~ . (]l c :>> ~ r---.... ~ :3 (]l ~ 101 .t: n< + ~ \' w 0\ C~ J\ :3 -.l , C ~ :,\ '-" "Tj 9 0 -lro ~0t ~l' V' w n?: ~.. 0\ a cn II ~ -.l 0 ~< N V> a +- 0- a -l~ ~ .)>. '.0 0\ '.0 C> =4' 0 0\ ::.? n ()) ~ C n~ ~ w ~ ~ 0\ c:: 'D , < '.0 'TJo 0\ -l_ ..... 0\ -.l a ..... w 0\ lJ\ -.l 0 0 V. '.0 ..... v' '-" ~ [/) :3l Z Vl ;:;1 "'Ti 'Tl ..... 0\ o tJ t""' ::E ~-21.r'&ib1~V;jlO .;J~~ {\~~rJ JL~~~~\;~:;;{jJ (2'~~~~ ,i~~\W ~~ ~OOl I 0 Nnr 'fJ15J~I' ~~~~~~~ ~ d. \L =--" :0 c,d U t"~ "" :.:i ::t'_ - (I) '" "'l ~.o - I:: ~ Q -l "'l (I) :.:i S (I) ::l - Ci "" CO' ~ "" '< N ..... N o o ..... I LL '~l- "I' ~ ~ ~,~u: ;earwater I- _ ___ :; I ~--- o FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE., 2nd Floor CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO: ~ -n.J <:v4y A-t(. FAX: 77':3 - ?tPrr - Phone: FROM: ./Ltt~U My,A/o I4JJ Phone: .J b 2- - y;p J " DATE: r... 2..-8' - () '-/ SUBJECT: f&<<J h:., 6l../ - 0.) 6 I P C" f ~.A'f eJA-t4/.A(l!~ MESSAGE: ~7-1 - ~ (J V~'i fJ/J.e It' i'W-/A ~<f JI.JV(' d/' .-- 4t:.,f1 3iA IJtj ~..-- ~ /lot At. ~J .. 4- d rtt!,L..t:.R./f' {.,/lY( iLL C/~ ?b y ~q b I..; , , t' "';; T fU\...JZ. Lf-, "20 bit ~ r ..f1u.. ?l tAR /6 i' k~ ~ 't' f) /L c.. - / ""'- J ~!J'~ NU1VJBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) t Pnnted 5/28/2004 u TImes are subject to change DRAFT ACTION AGENDA DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE Thursday, June 10,2004 9:00 a.m. STAFF REVIEW I~ HI A/h'Ut DRAFT t1,.A/~ . 11:30 am Case Number: FLD2004-030 18 -- 669 BAY ESPLANADE Owner(s): VIrginia B Franks 669 Bay Esplanade Clearwater, Fl 33767 TELEPHONE No Phone, FAX No Fax, E-MAIL No Emall Radchffe Development 2424 Curlew Rd Clearwater, FI 33683 TELEPHONE 727-785-4070 , FAX 727-784-0096, E-MAIL No Emall Representative: Keith Zayac 101 Phillippe Parkway Safety Harbor, Fl 34695 TELEPHONE 727-793-9888, FAX 727-793-9855, E-MAIL KEITHZA Y AC@AOL COM LocatIOn: 0 154 acres located on the east sIde of Bay Esplanade approximately 300 feet south of Somerset Street Atlas Page: 258A Zonmg District: T, Tounst Request: FleXible Development approval to penmt attached dwellings With a reductIOn to the mmlmum lot area from 10,000 square feet to 6,479 square feet, a reduction to the mmlmum lot wIdth from 100 feet to 60 feet, a reductIOn to the front (south) setback from 15 feet to one foot (to pavement), a reductIOn to the side (north) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to pavement) and a reductIOn to the rear setback from 20 feet 10 SIX feet to 6 19 feet to be a patIO and With an mcrease to bUlldmg heIght from 35 feet to 67 feet (to elevator overrun), under the provISIons of SectIOn 2-803 Proposed Use' Attached dwelhngs Neighborhood Clearwater Beach ASSOCiation Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 827 Mandalay Ave TELEPHONE 727-446-5801, FAX No Fax, E-MAIL dmacnav@att net Presenter. MIke Reynolds, Semor Planner Attendees Included: Mike Reynolds, Chip Gerlock, Scott Rice Applicant The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering. Development ReView Agenda - Thursday, June 10,2004 - Page 1 Comments from sec" ...1 submittal For June 10,2004 D R C 1) The proposed 2-1/2" fire service line to the proposed stand pipe can't be Installed on a restncted hne 2) The proposed wood deck IS shown being constructed at the southerly property hne? 3) Fire service hne for the 2-1/2" stand pipe will need to be 4"10 diameter ThiS fire service Ime should be Included with the health pennlt to Install the new water maIO All of the above to be addressed pnor to CDB Pnor to C 0 1) CondommIUm plat reqUired Comments from first submittal 1) Need to Install a 6" saOltary sewer "wye" on eXlstmg maIO for saOltary sewer service No need to construct manhole as proposed MET SEE REVISED PLAN 05/13/04 2) Backlow preventor for fire service hoe Will be mstalled by the City and located on pnvate property at the nght-of-way hne MET SEE REVISED PLAN 05/13/04 3) City Will provide tap for fire line and Install backflow preventor device only All applicable fees 10 be paid for by applicant MET ACKNOWLEDGED 4) The applicant to Install fire service line from tapping sleeve and valve to the locatIOn of backflow preventor device and from device to buildmg MET SEE REVISED PLAN 05/13/04 5) Need to mstal1 one Jomt of ductile I ron pipe service Side of backflow preventor device MET SEE REVISED PLAN 05/13/04 6) Gate valves to be Installed on both Sides of the backflow preventor device for fire I me protectIOn MET SEE REVISED PLAN 05/13/04 7) Need to show F D C connectJon MET SEE REVISED PLAN 05/13/04 8) Need to mstall FHA wlthm 40 ft of F D C MET SEE REVISED PLAN 05/13/04 9) Scale shown 1" = 20 ft , the actual scale IS 1" = 10ft (Sheet 6 of 9) MET SEE REVISED PLAN 05/13/04 10) Dnve aisle necks down 1020 ft should be 24 ft MET SEE REVISED PLAN 05/13/04 11) Where do guest and serVIce utility trucks park? MET SEE REVISED PLAN 05/13/04 12) Need to show eXlstmg gas mam Within Bay Esplanade's nght-of-way MET SEE REVISED PLAN 05/13/04 Environmental: 1 See slormwater comments Fire: Development ReView Agenda - Thursday, June 10,2004 - Page 2 Show FDC at leasl ~..J feet from the bUilding and wIthin 40 feet oftl,. ,'Ire Hydrant PRIOR TO COB 5J24104-J_C Fife Department ConnectIOn must be free-standmg and not on Double Check Valve Assembly As per NFPA 14, SectIOn 4-3 1 There shall be no shutoff valve between the Fire Department ConnectIOn and the system 2 Where underground water mams and hydrants are to be mstalled, they shall be mstalled, completed, and 10 service pnor to constructIOn as per NFPA 241 Please acknowledge PRIOR TO COB 5f24f04-LC Note #8 shown on Utility Sheet needs to add the words "and hydrants" 3 Plans submitted for Fire ReVIew must reflect adherence to Flonda Fire Prevention Code, 200 I &l1tlOn and the follow1Og Codes NFPA 101,2000 EditIOn, NFPA 70,1999 EditIOn and Flonda Statute 633 Show on a Code Reference Sheet PRIOR TO BLDG PERMIT 4 Provide drawmgs that have been prepared by or under the direction of an Engmeer registered under F S Chapter 471 for all fire Spn nkler systems as per Flonda B Ulldmg Code, 200 1 &iltlOn, Sec 104 4 1 3 Draw10gs shall be signed and sealed by a Professional Eng10eer as per F S 471025 The mstallatlOn shall be In accordance with NFPA 13, 1999 Edition by a licensed Fire Spnnkler Contractor under separate permit with drawings Please acknowledge PRIOR TO BLDG PERMIT 5 Fire Alarm 1Oslallallon shall be m accordance With NFP A 72, 1999 EdItion by a licensed Ftre Alarm Contractor under separate pennlt with drawmgs Please acknowledge PRIOR TO BLDG PERMIT 6 Fire Department Connections shall be IdentIfied by a sign that states "No Parkmg, Fire Department ConnectIon" and shall be deSigned m accordance wIth F10nda Department of TransportatIOn standards for 1OfonnatlOn Slgnage and be mamtalned with a clearance of 7 Y.! feet 10 front of and to the sides of appliance As per Flonda Fire PreventIOn Code, 2000 &l1tlOn, modification to SectIOn 3-5 6 ofNFPA 1 Please acknowledge mtent to comply PRIOR TO BLDG PERMIT 7 Install a Knox Key Box for emergency access as per NFPA 1, Sec 3-6 and Install prior to bUlld10g final 1OspectlOn Please acknowledge Pnor to Bldg F1OallnspectlOn 8 Provide a wet standpipe With 2 If2 lOch lOch connectIOn with 1 112 lOch detachable adaptor connectIon and cap With attached cham, at the rear of the property wtthlO 100 feet of the dock connechon to land Provide a detail of the standpipe on the detail sheet PrIOr to COB 5/24/04-LC Standpipe deSIgn mcorrect ThiS IS the same as a yard hydrant that supplies water for Fire Department to connect to 10 order to fight a fire on the dock 9 Provide portable Fife ExtmgUlshers listed for Class A, Class B and Class C fires that meet the requuements of NFP A 10, must be mstalled at the pier/land lOtersectlOn Additional Fire ExtmgUlshers must be placed on the dock so that the maximum travel distance to an Ext10gUlsher does not exceed 75 feet As per NFPA 303, Fire ProtectIOn Standard for MarInas and Boat yards, Section 4 2 2 1 Please acknowledge PRIOR TO BLDG PERMIT Harbor Master: No Comments Legal: No Comments Land Resources' 1 The tree survey IS lOcomplete, revise prIor to COB Landscaping: Development ReView Agenda - Thursday, June 10,2004 - Page 3 1 5/28/2004 (A_D) The plans now show plants In the rear along the seawall, however, there IS no access path to the dock Remove an area for access and submIt revIsed plans 4/2012004 (A_D) The landscape plan does not have any matenal shown on the rear of the bUIldIng what IS proposed here? Show plants and trees or palms to be provIded outsIde of the concrete deck area 2 4/20/2004 (A_D) Per Section 3-1204 D all landscapIng must be protected from vehIcular and pedestrIan traffic by the InstallatIOn of curbIng and wheel stops, or other protectIve devIces along the pen meter of any landscapIng whIch adJoIns vehIcular use areas and sIdewalks These protectIve devIces shall have a mInImum heIght of SIX Inches above grade RevIse plans to show the curbIng and submIt for revIew 3 The use of sprengern fern IS not recommended as thIs plant IS extremely InVaSIVe, change to another ground cover matenal Parks and RecreatIon: No Comments Storm water . 1 No storm water control system proVIded, all of the folloWIng requrred pnor to CDB except for the seasonal hIgh water level 1) 1/2 Inch water quality treatment reqUired per CIty regs 2) ProVIde gradIng detaIls shoWIng sIte runoff gOIng through pond for treatment (met) 3) ProVIde trench dram across dnveway(met) 4) Pond reqUIred to draw down In 24hrs or less(before CO) 5) Pond cannot be covered by deck or buIldIng 4) ProVIde cross sectIons for water quality pond 5) ProvIde eVIdence of seasonal hIgh water for draw down cales SolId Waste: 1 That dumpster servIce be arranged WIth the Sohd Waste Department pnor to the Issuance of an occupatIOnal license or certIficate of occupancy Please contact Tom Glenn - 727-562-4930 5-20-04 Dumpster wIll be rolled out by complex mamtenance to stagIng area Traffic Engmeermg. 1 1 Objects wIthIn the sIght dIstance trIangles must not exceed 30" m heIght from the pavement Remove parkIng spaces obstructIng sIght VISIbIlity trIangles 2 All dnve aIsles must be 24' wIde 3 Dnvers must not back out blindly from parkIng space If solid lIne on site plan IS a shear wall then applicant must proVide some measures to prevent sight obstructIon Show proposed columns and shear walls to and demonstrate that they do not encroach Into parkIng spaces and that adequate sIght distances are proVIded 4 All of the above to be addressed pnor to CDB *Traffic Impact Fees of $5,00800 to be paId pnor to C 0 Applicant to prOVide Information on the number of UnIts for apartment buIldIng In order to receIve TIF credll Planmng: P/4.vM~ 4~ 70 1),& ~~J~~ Development ReVIew Agenda - Thursday, June 10,2004 - Page 4 1 I The site plan neeu_ .J show all dimenSlOns, the footpnnt and size o. .1 proposed bUlldmgs and structures, label all setbacks, all eXlstmg and proposed accessways, all reqUIred sIte tnangles, IdentificatIOn of envlfonmentally umque areas, locatIOns of all public and pnvate easements, all parking and loadmg spaces, sohd waste contamers, outdoor hghtmg, and eXisting and proposed sIdewalks 2 Redesign the site to provide 10 foot sIde and front setbacks 3 The use of the docks need to be lImited to the residents of La Rlsa n 4 The site plan does not appear to take Into account the bUIlding columns 5 There are too many layers of data on the site plan Prepare a clearly legIble Site plan sheet 6 What IS the width of the outSide stairs? 7 The bUlldmg floor plan appears to be inconsistent with the Site plan 8 Why is there a restroom/shower area mSlde the parkmg area? 9 Why are there five cabanas for four reSidential Units? 10 Why are there two sets of stmrs for each Unit? 2 The site data table needs to state the offiCial records book and page numbers for any utilIty easements State both the maximum allowed and proposed ISR 3 PrOVide bUlldmg elevatlOn drawmgs m color, showmg all Sides of the bUlldmgs, with dImensIOnal arrows Measure the height from BFE Other: No Comments Notes: fJt4IpNi~ 4Jfl,A(~ n u ~A'/ -J,M I LV'JJ~~ Development ReView Agenda - Thursday, June 10,2004 - Page 5 ftEITH. Z.AY/\C & ASSOC'ATES, INC. __ .7 ~~ ~ .,.""" _ ~ ,.. ~ _~ _~ -"<- _ ....... ~ .,."'.......~ '" - -""" ....."~~..-;~~~~~-........---------~".-----,,....._____~_____"-......J~~~~~""""~~..,;'-_ -..... _~ '--- _ CIVIL ENGINEERING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTUR.E PLANNING 181 rllILIPPEPARK\\'AY "'1t>, E.Uns:~~ m e::.. SUITEm40+ SAFETY HARBOR, FLORIDA 34695 ............,....:.....:.:~ ~ --=-~~..:. ~ ~~:.:-=- ~~~ :..;.;.,;:, ~-;-::';~~= ~ ~Q ~.:q ~~ '9"' ~ ~~~ ~ ~~;:: r~~~ .co. .........._ _ _.... ...~___ PHONE 727 793 9888 FAX 727 793 9855 EMAIL KEITHZAYAC@AOL (OM , ~,~~--= ~ a.. ~~~ ~~ '''-Le-:=.~ ~ - '~~"=-~"''''~~~~~~'~.$~';r~-~-~---~~~~~~~''''''''~~'Ht May 14 2004 . F I :CD" -, Mr Mike Reynolds City of Clearwater Development Review 100 S Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Fl34618 . ' , ORIGINAL ,.A. · v -f. l """:!/. lr. j . , Lv..." Dear Mr ReynDlds, RE: LARISA II 669 BAY ESPLANADE Enclosed please find 15 sets of revised site and architectural plans addressmg ORC comments Including the follOWing GENERAL ENGINEERING 1 The sanitary sewer manhole has been revised to a "wye" connection to the eXisting system 2 The fire lme backflow preventor has been relocated to the property line, and Installed by the City 3 It IS acknowledged that the City will provide tap for fire hne and Install backflow preventor deVice only Applicant will pay fees 4 Note #9 has been added to the utility plan regarding the Installation of the fire servIce 5 The entire fire service IS designed as ductile Iron pIpe due to the close proximity of the sanrtary service 6 Two gate valves have been added Dn both sIdes of the backflow preventor on the fire line 7 A F D C connection has been added to the fire hne backflow preventor 8 A fire hydrant has been added to the utility plan Within 40 feet of the FOe 9 The scale on sheet 7 of 10 has been revIsed 10 The driveway has been revised to 24 feet the entire length 11 The guest and service utIlity trucks Will park In the deSIgnated parkmg spaces required by the City code 12 The gas hne location, as proVided by Clearwater Gas, has been added to the utility plan 1 The F D C location has been added to the utility plan -- u JEi::-- -;-~~7 ~ ~ \i rnl MAY' 1 ~ 200~ 'i ~ I -- , --..- .~_.... I"...'I,.(.I..:J h.N.~i'l!' Cd I ~ -- FIRE .... 2 EXisting note #8 on the utility plan addresses ,N FPA 241 8 A wet standpipe similar to a blow off has been located at the rear of the property adjacent to the future dock locations 9 The revIsed architectural plans ShDW the Stairs terminating to a pubhc way on the exterior 10 A fire hydrant has been added to the utility plan adjacent to the project LANDSCAP'NG 1 Additional palm trees and understory landscape matenal has been added between the deck and seawall 2 The proposed landscaping along the north property hne has been substantially Increased along the north property line The parking and dnve Isles have been relocated Inside the bUilding to proVIde an eight foot buffer area along the north property hne Oleanders have been added to provide a large plant matenal for screening purpDses along the north property line, and Sea Grapes specified as a dense buffer along the south property hne In the small area of minimal setback along the south property line, a fence WIth climbing vines has been specified 3 There are no longer any extenor parking spaces on the plans 4 The site tnangles have been reVised to provIde more clanty of landscaping design 5 Foundation plantlngs and palm trees have been added around the bUilding envelDpe, and the entire non-paved portion of the site, except the proposed treatment pond, has been landscaped with shrub and tree plant matenals The two parkmg spaces In front of the bUilding have been removed, and a walkway created STORMWATER 1 A treatment pond has been added to the grading and drainage plan addreSSing o/.t water quality treatment 2 Additional grades and structures have been deSIgned to discharge runoff Into the proposed pond 3 The parking spaces have been removed from the front of the budding ellmlnatJng the necessity for a trench drain Only minimal concrete paving remains for access Into the parking garage 4 Enclosed are 15 copies of the treatment and drawdown calculations for the proposed pond 5 A geotechOlcal report WIll be provIded Idenbfylng the seasonal high water elevabon (25 MSL assumed) poor to bUIlding per1Tllt TRAFFIC ENGINEERING 1 The parking spaces have been removed from the site tnangle ~ rr 1 -. i"~,_1 \~ [€_fill ,"\ r--~'. - II "I I, 'I I ' I i 'l'~l MAY 1 ~ 2~~ ,; 1) J \ . 1 h..Ai\\~,~-------I~ 'Ie::> CITY Or ell:. " 2 The dnveway has been revised to 24 feet In Width the entire length ~. ~ 3 A mIrror has been located WIthin the parking garage on the site plan to assist wIth a back out movement within the parking garage The columns and walls are shown on the site plan and clearly shown outside of the parking spaces PLANNING 1 The site plan shows all dimenSions, footpnnt of proposed bUilding, setback labels, accessways and site tnangles There are no envIronmentally unIque areas or easements on the property The parking spaces, Sidewalks and trash location are shown on the plan A note IS located on the sIte plan calling for all IIghtmg to be part of the bu Ildlng With no freestanding fixtures 2 The site has been substantially redesigned to provide additional setbacks and green space The parking spaces have been removed from the front of the bUilding and put under the bUilding tD prOVide a minimum front setback Df 6 0 feet, and substantially more In most cases The previously shown storage areas Within the parking garage have been deleted and the buildIng location shifted to prOVIde an a O-foot north SIde setback The south setback vanes from the proposed wooded walkway and decking from 1 0 foot to 30 feet The south setback Widths are dictated by the necessity of the 1 9 0 parking spaces and 24 O~foot dnve Isle WIthIn the bUilding envelope and the requirement for two extenor stairways from the units 3 The use of the future docks will be limited to use by LaRlsa 1 & 11 reSidents 4 The bUilding columns Within the parking garage have been added to the garage layout and labeled 5 The background survey Information has been screened back substantially and the layenng system reVised to produce a more legible Site plan sheet 6 The Width of the outdoor StaIrs IS 42" 7 The bUilding floor plan and site plan have been reVised to prOVide conSIstent InfoOllaton 8 A Single restroom/shower IS proVided per code for an outdoor spa located on the proposed deck 9 There are five cabanas for use by LaRlsa I & II reSidents 10 Two sets of staIrs are reqUired by your bUilding code 11 A note has been added to the sIte plan stating that there are nD easements IdentJfied by the project survey on thiS property 12 Enclosed are reVised architectural plans shOWing all SIdes of the buildings with dimensional arrows Including the bUilding heIght -rn---~(<<T\m[\~'~\\ t~ 0 ~!D_. ---~l \\ \\ r:;AY \ . 200'1 ,llJJ, \ - ~~ -.1 ~ r'" -' "'.;) \ !U.f,,-NINGbr) ,L, 'I{ I~ f" LM'i Cr--V OF At t U~t' "r" L - L - -- tTJ "0 u.> (p' .., <=> -< .52 0 a (V 0 Q. ::l CI.l 5" 1:0 > --J ;:0 0- n 0 .., 0 1:0 r (]l ..., ::l: (]l -0 C ::.> ::.> CI.l (!l 0 ::.> ::l ::l ;:0 ::I 0- (V S @ 0 0 ::I V; ...,., :::g '"0 ;:l OJ e- po (V ..... --J --- '-< '" ::.> (V '-< 0 ::l ::I ::.> '" '---' OJ ('11 ..,. u.> IV 0\ 00> 0 0 'Tj @ 0 0 po --l ;0 0, U1 , n ;:0 ::.> (V n ,n c S EO co <1l 0- 0- ~ tJ r< <1l '" :E g <1l S -< 0 g, 2" 3 ...... (V .. -- tJ ~'\" j'f:lT)::!OAlI~ \ (';:")':- l' ' " " -:0 ~ 9N1N""\f1-:1 ~!\L ~_~_~JDon ",:_3111i I, -! 'j ~ 0;;; '?3 -/!o.U All> O:r: QI ii ;;U o " '" ;;U m fJj o ;:l. ..,. u.> u.> 0 0\ N ..,. IV Vl ..,. Vl <=> 0 -...l -...l ~ Vl 'D ~ 00 ~ Z 'Tj 00 g;~ "'TJ :::O=:. ~ f;; ~ ~ ., 0 ;:;.0 ""U = Z '" 0 ;; }> '< ""U -3 0 ~ Z '" 0 ..... 3 tlo = ..... tJ '" @" N >- tv < ..,. Vl(JQ g 'TJ2; (!l po t: n-< 00 ee.. <=> 'C o ~ ~ ..,. n> ..,. 0 e8 ..,. 00 0 ..,. 0 0 ~< ..,. <=> 0 00 \D --J2. ..,. :'J n c: ~ ..,. n.=( --J 0 ..,. C \D ,!,,< ..,. --J2. 1\fNI91~O ~ w ;;.; o o A :?: '" '< u.> N o o ..,. ..,. 00 tI r :::: Ad03 31lJ lJ ro u III ro D- O" '< ...... (]l Q) A W , ..... ,#""- '" ~t)wl-l ~&~~O~ ,*\Z~t.-r\1 = zdl'tt?- :::: (, h 1 t=I /~ ,~ Mf:A A..,-?tLh7 ~ :=- liP 7v~ \t- ~ (Itp"5I~_)(lllP1 ~/t\~ ') := -Z@.7Z- ~m~- - "\;; 464-, q4- ~3 / ZtJ.1Z-ft~A-+f{- -r ~ \,s, i t:7 +l~ ~ ~ - ----~-~ ~ -~ - ---- - __ _ J ~rnTrfJI' -~/1f1 ~1~~~ UlJ! M~;;~-~ lt~1 ~ h..!u,iNit.JG-r5f~'f:, CJ~77,T! "i b CITY OF ClEAfl!/V;\ j l::.R '" I C;.., I ... ___1___- I - - -- - --- - -- - .,' -- , ~{:~:l~Drwater >- '1"1" "'II I~u .......... ~~_ j 11 _ u TO: FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARW A TER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE., 2nd Floor CLEARW A TER, FL 33756 (727) 562..4567 FAX: (727) 562..4865 j! e (:.rA my a..JG 7~3-- 9?rr FAX: Phone: - FROM: /l1IIU ~ Vt-o / rlJ Phone: Ut.:l- ~ ~e?-J t DATE: r--y -6 Y SUBJECT:?i--O;Lob Y - &10/ J J)..LL ~r J"'C.I3 r.e P'W~ ~ --n/Le- 1/' 70 ~_ 6..-(. if- b - 0 y ~ MESSAGE: /Loo A.. ~ ~ I t IDt? J~ ArY~ AlVif!..,. NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) 0- r' '/ 11:30 am Case Number: H..D2004-030 I ~ 669 BAY ESPLANADE Owner(s): Vugmla B Franks DRAFT 669 Bay Esplanade Clearwater, Fl 33767 TELEPHONE No Phone, FAX No Fax, E-MAIL No Emml Applicant Radchffe Development 2424 Curlew Rd Clearwater, Fl 33683 TELEPHONE 727-785-4070, FAX 727-784-0096, E-MAIL No Email Representative: Keith Zayac 101 Phillippe Parkway Safety Harbor, FI 34695 TELEPHONE 727-793-9888, FAX 727-793-9855, E-MAIL KEITHZAYAC@AOLCOM Location: 0 154 acres located on the east side of Bay Esplanade approximately 300 feet south of Somerset Street Atlas Page. 258A Zonmg District: T, Tourist Request. Flexible Development approval to penmt attached dwellmgs WIth a reductIOn to the mlmmum lot area from 10,000 square feet to 6,479 square feet, a reductIOn to the mlmmum lot width from 100 feet to 60 feet, a reduction to the front (south) setback from 15 feet to one foot (to pavement), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to pavement) and a reductIOn to the rear setback from 20 feet to SIX feet (to ?) and With an Increase to bUlldmg height from 35 feet to 67 feet (to elevator overrun), under the provISions of SectIOn 2-803 Proposed Use: Attached dwelhngs Neighborhood Clearwater Beach Assocmtlon Association(s): Clearwater, FI 33767 827 Mandalay Ave TELEPHONE 727-446-5801, FAX No Fax, E-MAIL dmacnav@att netI Presenter: Mike Reynolds, Semor Planner Attendees Included' Mike Reynolds, Chip Gerlock, Scott Rice The DRe reviewed thiS apphcahon with the following comments: General Engineering: 1 1) Need to mstall a 6" samtary sewer "wye" on eXlstmg mam for samtary sewer service No need to construct manhole as proposed 2) Backlow preventor for fire service hne wtll be Installed by the City and located on pnvate property at the nght-of-way line 3) City will proVide tap for fire line and mstall backflow preventor deVice only All apphcable fees to be paId for by applicant 4) The applicant to mstall fire serVice Ime from tappmg sleeve and valve to the locatiOn of backflow preventor deVICe and from deVice to bUlldmg 5) Need to mstall one JOInt of duclile Iron pipe service side of backflow preventor deVice 6) Gate valves to be mstalled on both sides of the backflow preventor deVice for fire hne protectIOn 7) Need to show F D C connectIOn 8) Need to mstall FHA wlthm 40 ft of F D C 9) Scale shown 1" = 20 ft , the actual scale IS 1" = 1 0 ft (Sheet 6 of 9) 10) Dnve aJsle necks down to 20 ft should be 24 ft 11) Where do guest and service utility trucks park? 12) Need to show eXisting gas malO wlthm Bay Esplanade's flght-of-way All of the above to be addressed pnor to CDB Prior to C 0 1) CondommlUm plat reqUired Environmental: I See stormwater comments Fire. Development ReView Agenda - Thursday, May 6, 2004 - Page 16 Show FOC at least CDB Where underground water mams and hydrants are to be lOst ailed, they shall be mstalled, completed, and 10 service pnor to constructIOn as per NFPA 241 Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB Plans submltted for Fire Review must reflect adherence to Flonda Fife PreventlOn Code, 200 I EditIOn and the followmg Codes NFP A 101, 2000 Edition, NFP A 70, 1999 Edition and Flonda Statute 633 Show on a Code Reference Sheet PRIOR TO BLDG PERMIT Provide drawmgs that have been prepared by or under the directIOn of an Engmeer registered under F S Chapter 471 for all fire spnnkler systems as per Flonda B Ulldmg Code, 200 1 &lItlOn, Sec 1044 1 3 Drawings shall be Signed and sealed by a ProfeSSIOnal Engmeer as per F S 471025 The mstallatlOn shall be 10 accordance With NFPA 13, 1999 EditIon by a licensed Fire Spnnkler Contractor under separate permit With drawmgs Please acknowledge PRIOR TO BLDG PERMIT Fire Alarm InstallatIOn shall be In accordance With NFPA 72, 1999 EditIon by a hcensed Fire Alarm Contractor under separate permit With drawmgs Please acknowledge PRIOR TO BLDG PERMIT Fife Department ConnectIons shall be Identified by a sign that states "No Parkmg, Flfe Department ConnectIOn" and shall be deSigned m accordance With Flonda Department of TransportatIOn standards for mformatIon Slgnage and be mamtamed With a clearance of 7 Yz feet m front of and to the sides of appliance As per F10nda Fire Prevention Code, 2000 Edmon, modlfical1on to SectIon 3-56 ofNFPA 1 Please acknowledge mtent to comply PRIOR TO BLDG PERMIT Install a Knox Key Box for emergency access as per NFP A I, Sec 3-6 and mstall pnor to bUlldmg final mspectlon Please acknowledge Pnor to Bldg FmallnspectlOn Provide a wet standpipe Wlth 2 1/2 lOch lOch connechon With t 1/2 lOch detachable adaptor connectIOn and cap With attached cham, at the rear of the property wlthm 100 feet of the dock connectIon to land PrOVide a detail of the standpipe on the detaIl sheet Pnor to CDB 9 StaIrs must not termmate In the parkmg garage but must eXit to a pubhc way on the extenor 10 Provide a FIre Hydrant on the same Side of the street and wlthm 40 feet of the FOC Harbor Master: No Comments t' .r' eet from the buddmg and wlthm 40 feet of thl.. _ .Ie Hydrant PRIOR TO 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Legal: No Comments Land Resources: I The tree survey IS Incomplete, revise pnor to CDB Landscapmg' Development ReView Agenda - Thursday, May 6, 2004 - Page 17 " The landscape plai:~ ~s not have any matenal shown on the rear of , DUlldmg what IS proposed here? Show plants and trees or palms to be provided outside of the concrete deck area 2 The plan has hmlted landscapmg proposed, matenals used should be changed to better buffer the suroundmg residents The north setback to parkmg IS at zero feet where It seems that by shlftmg all the parking / dnve Isle to the south there could be a seven foot area for plantmg to the north of the bUlldmg Shift parkmg and provlde plants that will fit m the space estabhshed Perhaps there could be taller matenals used along the property hnes, and areas found to place a chmbmg vme (FICUS pumlla) that Will grow 10 a small space along the bUlldmg walls and columns 3 Per Section 3-1204 D alllandscapmg must be protected from vehicular and pedestnan traffic by the mstallatlOn of curbmg and wheel stops, or other protective deVices along the pen meter of any landscapmg which adJoms vehicular use areas and Sidewalks These protective deVices shall have a mmlmum helght of SIX mches above grade ReVise plans to show the curb10g and submit for review 4 Landscape Plan does show the sight tnangles as descnbed 10 Arttcle 3, DIVISIOn 9, revise the plan to show these trIangles as cross hatched for c1anty of plans at all the waterfront, street and dnveway mtersectlOns 5 Per SectIOn 3-1202 E 2 Foundation plant10gs shall be proVided for 100% of a bUlldmg facade With frontage along a street nght of way, excluding space necessary for buddmg mgress and egress, Within a minimum five foot Wide landscaped area composed of at least two accent trees (or palm eqUivalents) or three palms for every 40 lmear feet of buddmg facade and one shrub for every 20 square feet of reqUIred landscaped area A mmlmum of 50% of the area shall contam shrubs With the remamder to be ground cover The parkmg spaces to the north on the outSide of the buddmg may fit under and wlthm the bUlldmg and allow for the site to meet thiS cntena Remove the two spaces m front of the bUlldmg and create a walkway to any necessary egress stftlrs as reqUIred by bUlldmg and fire codes Parks and Recreation: No Comments Stonnwater: 1 No stormwater control system proVided, all of the followmg req Ulred pnor to CDB except for the seasonal high water level 1) 1/2 lOch water quality treatment reqUIred per City regs 2) PrOVide gradmg details showmg Site runoff gOing through pond for treatment 3) ProVide trench dram across dnveway 4) Pond reqUired to draw down m 24hrs or less 4) ProVide cross sectIOns for water quahty pond 5) PrOVide eVidence of seasonal high water for draw down cales Sohd Waste' No Comments Traffic Engmeermg. 1 1 Objects wlthm the Sight distance tnangles must not exceed 30" m height from the pavement Remove parkmg spaces obstructmg Sight vlslblhty tnangles 2 All dnve aisles must be 24' Wide 3 Dnvers must not back out blmdly from parkmg space If sohd lme on site plan IS a shear wall then applicant must proVide some measures to prevent Sight obstructIOn Show proposed columns and shear walls to and demonstrate that they do not encroach mto parkmg spaces and that adequate Sight distances are proVided 4 All of the above to be addressed pnor to CDB *Traffic Impact Fees of $5,00800 to be pftld pnor to C 0 Apphcant to proVide mformatlon on the number of umts for apartment bUlldmg ID order to receive TIF credit Planmng: Development ReVIew Agenda - Thursday, May 6, 2004 - Page 18 , 1 I The Site plan nee&" ,.show all dimensIOns, the footpnnt and size 01 _ _. proposed buddmgs and structures, label all setbacks, all eXisting and proposed accessways, all reqUIred site tnangles, IdentificatIOn of environmentally umque areas, locations of all public and pnvate easements, all parkmg and loading spaces, sohd waste containers, outdoor hghtlng, and eXisting and proposed sidewalks 2 Redesign the site to provide 10 foot side and front setbacks 3 The use of the docks need to be !tmlted to the residents of La Rlsa II 4 The SIte plan does not appear to take mto account the bUlldmg columns 5 There are too many layers of data on the site plan Prepare a clearly legible SIte plan sheet 6 What IS the wIdth of the outside statrs? 7 The bUlldmg floor plan appears to be mconslstent with the Site plan 8 Why IS there a restroom/shower area mSlde the parkmg area? 9 Why are there five cabanas for four residential umts? 10 Why are there two sets of stam for each umt? .' 2 The site data table needs to state the OffiCldl records book and page numbers for any utIlity easements State both the maximum allowed and proposed ISR 3 Provide bUlldmg elevation drawmgs In color, showmg all sides of the bUlldmgs, With dimensIOnal arrows Measure the height from BFE Other' No Comments Notes: Development ReView Agenda - Thursday, May 6,2004 - Page 19 ~ t~~.i?#:. ,t1a~ I\lOF tN/if..;.,. l~ ~~uF~7X"" ,\1~~1'1~~'" ~C::3(,\ I/~,!n ~ ~ ~ ~~:_r-\_~~~ ..c:;.;. === ~~, oiP-.- ~,. ':.~~ - ,(0 ~';~ ~ rlf.~-<;.II"\.~~" .~~~1Ei\...",. '#--.#~,.~ CITY OF CLEARWATER loNG RANGE PlANNING DEVFLOPMENT REvIEW PlANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUII.DING, 100 Soum MYRUE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONl: (727) 562-4567 FAX (J27) 562-4576 March 30, 2004 Mr Keith Zayak, PE 101 PhIlIppe Parkway, SUIte 205 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 RE. FLD2004-03018, 669 Bay Esplanade Dear Mr Zayak The Planmng staff has reviewed your apphcatlOn for FlexIble Development approval to penUlt attached dwellmgs wIth a reduction to the rmnImum lot area from 10,000 square feet to 6,479 square feet, a reduction to the rmmmum lot Width from 100 feet to 60 feet, a reductIOn to the front (south) setback from 15 feet to one foot (to pavement), a reductlOn to the SIde (north) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to pavement) and a reductlOn to the rear setback from 20 feet to SIX feet (to ?) and WIth an Increase to bUlldmg heIght from 35 feet to 67 feet (to elevator overrun), under the provlslOns of Section 2-803. After a prehrmnary review of the subrmtted documents, staff has detenmned that the applIcatlOn IS complete. The Development ReView Comrmttee Will reVIew the apphcatlOnfor sufficzency on May 6,2004, III the Plannmg Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the MUnICipal ServIces BUlldmg, 100 South Myrtle Avenue, m Clearwater. You or a representative must be present to answer any questIOns that the comrmttee may have regardmg your apphcatlon. Comments you WIll receive at the DRC meetmg must be addressed and submItted to the Plannmg Department by noon on May 13, 2004 (15 copIes of all subrmttals) If you have any questIons, please do not heSitate to call me at 727-562-4504 Smcerely, I'J;fr~ H. ~ MIChael H Reynolds, AICP Sentor Planner S \Planmng Departmenf\C D B\FLEXV>endmg caseS\Up for the next DRC\Bay Esplanade 669 La RlSa II (T}\Bay Esplanade 669 Complete Lefler doc BRIAN J AUNGS r, MAYOR-COMMI~SIONFR HO'f1 H,\MIJ10N, VICf MAVOR-COMMI'i';lONrR WIIITNFY GRAY, COMMI%IONrR rKANK HIUBARD, COMMISSIONFR * Bill JON~ON, COMMI"IOM R "[ QUA! EMPI GYMI NT AND An IRMA 1 IVI AClION EM PIon Il" ... ,..,------: \ ~\ ) \ ?r- , ~t \ ~"9~ ~ \ ~~1r~t ~ \ ,,,-p ~ \ '"'"':( L.-~~....j; \ ';\~'1, \ ~~ \ "'''\ \ \ ~~i \ "I ", \ ,\ 'l .........i_r- ..--- p" 1 '" c, I; a '" ~~ l'l . ~ "'......."'" III I ::::; iii:!m .~ ~"g~g .~ 'i:l~~';:l~ i~ ~ DC 9';;: jj eE .. ~(IIoJ.!"""./'I' ~ i ;; i' ; +:: .o::i 0 ; ~~ iiinii ~~ .~ e9~~ ~~ ~ ~B !g ~ ]~ III ] a ~ U ~ ~~ ~~ 8~ 8 .. P ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ j~ h ill!; H S ~. ~~ ~ i~ 9 ~ i 0 0 " -a~ c~ ~i ~; u ~~ i ~i '" B ~ e ~ jis N" ~i ~ 5~ I ~ ~ ~ X ~"~~ ~~ ~~ 0 :IE ~ 0 ~ r~ liE ~~~ ~.~ ~~g g F II ~ . ~ ~~ ~~ ~~: ~~ ~ B ~~ ~ ~~ i ...~ I ~ I I t I - i ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ j~ ~ ~ ~; ~ ~~ . I I i U J;; ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~. >~ O~.. <g ~ i '" ! ~~ ~ ~ a~ ~ ~ ~I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1I ~ ~~.~" ~~~ > r ; I .; ~ ! \l~ ~ 2 ~o >II . ~~ ~ ;~ 'i? 11 ~~!i~~"@~'l1O . 3 ~ ~ i ~ ~" ~1l" ~ ~~ il '8 '::!.qoiil ~ ~~ ~; ~ p 0 'II) ~C1 ......... ~ r ~ ~ R ~ ~:!t ~ ~~~ ~ 8 ~ :;,~ ~f~~~ I I ~ ~ ~ ~~ g~ f ~ :1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~~ "r~ ~ . ~ "~ ~~ ~ ~,; ~ 't .... ~~ ,., 3 ~ ~ n ~p . ~" 0 ~ Ii ~~ l::g ~ ~ '" d ~ 8 ~a 0 ~o I ~ 11 ~ 'm?'~ ~~8 ~ .<~~~ ~d ~ " . ~< S ~~ 3 <<k l ~~~ ~ ~ :Ezz ~ ~ ~ ~~ ,., ::I !I!. 'il J>. I .... ,,=::. ~ I! I <0 1i"_~.,I-..:I ULiJllIIIUIillo...- LA RISA U ..]~n IliA'>..\{ 'A'S.c.l(l<\H_'odNC av.Ll}.V"~ ~Hl'cLJ-i..P:L. ~ RADCUJ!T'E DEVEI..OPMENT LL..C "'" _'-j""io.~!ilm.)'tJ ~ 24U CURLI:I' ROAD l.\oI'TCi~IIIXD\_~__ PALIl IWlIIOIl. 1'1. 34889 ~.. ::::::;;:: ~l...QIlI?""~"'L""'" ~..J;11.-tIQ.n.;;N; CLF;ARW ,\.TI!:R FLORID,\. Sin PLAN -~- "'L\~~~~ ..' ~'-li~1 >! ~a~~ ~~oe~~~~:::1 i ~I'~~ ~; f"ii: .ml!U;5 . m~..... r , I ~ , j H ~ <: ~ M 0 f rl ~ "f"- a 0 n~ ~ tlU i i~ If ~ ~ ;; j i ~ ~; ~ ~ ~ .. lo' ... ~ ii '1', H :ii E F ~ I Hi ~! h ~f P \i I ~ 12, i It -, -jl .1. 0 ~ ..}!'~ i! i~! 3 ~: t.i % '0" f., -j' -!. z [h.l f q 11 :; !! 1> S :;i ,;.' ,1 'l. ij" m li't~ 1 f{ I! I.! " 1- '" r - " I, !l1< I' ! I ;ri !.! '1 ff} fi ; ft~ ! i! l! =!~ r: ;1 I, I . , '.. I- ~ ;! ,h i' i:; 4 I ~ I Ii ~ I ,1 ,",- f. ! l 1 l. - h i. f' . I ' 1. !~ ~!i ~l : ~ i : h !i i; . t ! i a ~~ ;, i ' If . - il :ii ~ B 11 .. il'MU.tA:f w.w LA R ISA U ~l),U:r lOC ~~EA RW i\ '1'E R F' r 'aRT D,\ ~r "....,1 T,^ND~("APE.. PlAN :::U;"'Rl4R,~~..".....o;. '\ ,."....,..... ~._~ - ~.....~- -~" " I '" ,. 0- :J! ~" .~ " l'l ',. !;; ;. j:: .... l" ~ k~ ~ ~?.t i i " ~;; ,~ . - ,-. If. 'ji i_ ,11. :1 J >.II :_ji t :!; r~ 'Hi ~ i f !:.J ~l 'ic; ~ 3:l~ t ] ill _ j ~ · i ;1; "ql r! I ~l 'I h 11,1 . 'I ! .,' . I _'. il;1 i i! !;'!"" ~:h~l .;:1 ~l"i~ '!Iii ~; ~i f 't " ~ i ~I 1- ~l ' -!..I; ~j' 'I. ~ ',I,,;:! j. ' I ~! I I ;~ II ~ t J ~; ~'l 'I ' 1'1 c, :~ :.'~ '1.1 Ii tIll, i >;h I " 'I [.,:1. I I 'I'" !<.. !l 1:"' ~!! . ~ l~l . ~! '!. 1, "l 1.... ..ii '" I ~ &~ Z ~.. -I ~_ ~ .1_ · "' I " · ; ,! ,i " 1,. -..'" _ .. f! ~ -: i; ! ; l' ,-;: .' ." I' .,,' 11;!! i:~ [: ;;. i 'j !! i ! r '. !: i t' II lr~~ 'I.f.;. 0 1'- l ;;1 ; l ; j : ; .1 : ~ i 1.I;i ~!!f ] ~i 1 ,n : ~ ii ! '" ! ! ~ -, 1 , II . > t I 'I ,{ -1.( i ~! I ,! j} fI ~ I ~. , I.! ~ [I I! -i 1 H ~ j'i: !. " I It! ! 1, '1 f 1: ~ t I! i ll1 '. ii; ,j l' ' , -. I! I · 'n'j } o' !. I J ' f , ~ ; _ i · { i '! i.:! !'. 'I ~ '. ~" i ! I! ~ · h : ! ~ 1 I ~ : I", ~!; II! ~ I ~~ I ... If.il i i :[~ ~ :! l:' i J iil~ '1I!i. "la. i f t~ , ,. ;,'1 I 1. ~ , f j' i, I ~. ~ I _ , I" t :i ~" f, I ! I '~!, i!; ~i.l !. :j j i .I', I " , f ! Ii. I ' i!l l. '.. " ; I n; ~ i: I ; i j HI f; l. :i! 1, -I ..!~ "j 1, ~ I t. ~ -' 1; ~ 'I _ ,_, I " I.'-! ; I " . ~ III ~l!, t 1 i ~ :, ft. . ~. . I,' I ." i j' 'f .' i " f " l!~ ~ ~ Ii' . , U I,! ! !: i I I " . ')1 11; . . ! . ; I, , H -V-I,\TL..,INt f c' · Klllll1_AY,\t~n"".n._""...... CN'I1..~t-G t.A; ~ RAOClJITE DE:VELOPME"fr 1 I C :~==~~ 24 ~4 rlJR~.EW ROA [) IH.'+IL ____ I A1..M UAJWUR t1. '\..46tj l ~~~..."ti"~ ... CL W CoverSheet '\. ~!OO ~ :I:~l~~w PLAnNING & OEVdOPMCJ.C. , _ CITYOFClEARWAlER FLD2004-03018 669 BA Y ESPLANADE Date Received: 03/24/2004 LA RISA II ZONING DISTRICT: T LAND USE: RFH ATLAS PAGE: 258A PLANNER OF RECORD: NOT ENTERED PA~D CK.NO, ~5C.~ I~S . DATE t?3.J.1J(J c{ ~<;_ W ~ ) ) I ) ) --/ ZONING DISTRICTS ~ 2-802 , Table 2-802 'r District Flexible Standard Development Standards Mm Lot Mm Lot Max. Area Width Height Mm Setbacks Mm Off-Street r,Jse (sq ft) (ft) (ft) (ft ) Density Parking Front Stde Rear " Accessory Dwellmgs nia nia nia nia nla nla 30 urn!:&' lIwnt acre Alcohohc Beverage Sales 5,000 50 35 10-15 10 20 nla ~lper 1,000 GFA Attached Dwellmgs 10,000 I 100 35----50 10-15 10 10-20 30 urn!:&' 15 per wut acre - , Govemmental Uses(1) 10,000 100 35----50 10-15 0-10 10-20 ola 3---411,000 GFA Indoor RecreatlOnlEntertam- 5,000 50 35-100 0-15 0-10 20 nla 10 per 1,000 GFA IDent , Medica! Cl1mc 10,000 100 30-50 10---15 , 10 20 20 2:;-0-311,000 GFA Nightclubs \ 5,000 50 35 15 "10 '. 20 nie. ' 10 per 1,000 GFA , , ,0, Non-ResIdential Off-Street nla nJa ola 25 5 10 nla nla ParkIng / , , Offices 10,000 100 35-50 10-~5 0-10 10-20 nla 3-4 spaces per 1)000 GFA '2 5"spaces per 1,000 sq ft. oflot area or Outdoor Recr!atlOnlEnter- J as determmed by - 5,000 50 35 10-----15 10 20 nla tKe commwuty de- tamment velopment dIrector - based on rrE Man- - ~~' '\- Ual standards - 40 rooms! Ovenught Accommooabons 20,000 100-150 35-50 10-15 0-10 10-20 1 per, umt acre Parkmg Garages and Lots 20,000 100 50 15-25 10 10-20 ola nla 1 pe~ 20,000 SF land area or as de- Parks and Recreabon FacIh- tel'IlllIled by the ole ola 50 25 10 20 ola communIty develop- tIes ment coordInator based on lTE Man- ual standards Pubhc TransportatIOn Faclh- nla ola 10 wa ola ola nfa wa bes(2) , SIdewalk Vendors nfa ola nfa nfa ola ola 'rua , nia Restaurants 5,000- 50-100 25-35 10-15 0-10 10-20 nfa 7-15 spaces per 10,000 1,000 GFA Retail Sales and Services 5,000- 50-100 35-50 10-15 0-10 10-20 ola 4--5 spaces per 10,000 , 1,000 GFA SOCIal and CommunIty Center 5,000- 50-100 35-50 10-15 0-10 10-20 nla 4--5 spaces per 10,000 1,000 GFA UbhtylInfrastTIlcture Faedl- nla nla nla 25 10 10 nla nla best 3) Supp No 6 CD2 65 M. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: \I\i!A\~IA ffiyJ~ (Names of an property owners) That (I amlWe are) the owner(s) and record bile holder{s) of the follOWing descnbed property (address or generallocabon) tdR9 ~A'( E.7'P~UA~ 2 ~ ~ Thatlhe undersIgned (haslhave) appolllted and (does/do) appoint A\.tD ~ffi Z'A.,(,A.C--;~e.. l~ ~ 'Ff...."(U-r 3 as (hlsfthelr) agent(s) to execute any pebbons or other documents necessary to affect such pebbon 4 Thatlhls affidavit has been executed to IIIduce the City of CleafWaler, Ronda 10 consider and ad on the above descnbed property 5 That slle VISIts 10 the property are necessary by CIty representabves III order 10 process ttns app6cabon and the owner authonzes ClIy representatives to VlslI and photograph the property descnbed In ttus appUcabon, 6 That (1Iwe), the undersigned authonty, hereby certify that the foregOing IS lrue and STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINEL LAS 3/ sr- day of who haVIng been first duty swom My CommISSion Expires MARILYN KUIPERS COMMISSION' 000.59..98 EXPlRfS SEP 23 200.5 llONOEO 1liROUGH MNANfAGf N01MY 81lllmg Of! pme EOO pme Page 6 of 6 - Flexible Development Appllcabon - City of CleafWater EXHIBIT A DESCRIPTION OF REQUESTS · Reduction ofmmlmum lot area from 10,000 sf to 6,479 s f · ReductIon of mInimUm lot width from 100 feet to 60 feet · Reduce front setback from 15 feet to 1 foot minimum · Reduce sIde setback from 10 feet to 0 mlfilmum · Reduce rear setback from 20 feet to 6 feet mInimUm EXHIBIT B GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA RESPONSES 1 The proposed development of the land will be In harmony wuh the scale, bulk, coverage, denslfy and charaaer of adjacent propertle,!; In whIch If I" located Rather than beIng in hannony With the character of the existIng older multI-family projects located adjacent to the Site, the project WlII set a new standard for the neighborhood, similar to LaRlsa I The proposed prOject will however mamtam the character of Clearwater Beach with the proposed Mediterranean archItectural theme and small-scale condomInium development The project does not deviate from the permitted uses In the Tounst ZonIng Dlstnct and represents a decrease In density from the existIng 8-umt apartment complex to 4 condomInIUm uruts The character of the project is an upscale condomInIUm development with upgraded architectural fimshes and textures 2 The proposed development wlll not hinder or dl~courage the appropnate development and use of adjacent land and buddmgs or slgmficantly lmpazr the value thereof The proposed development IS consistent with the eXistIng surroundIng and proposed land uses The project WIll be consistent with the re-development of LaRlsa I to the east, and set a posItive example for the redevelopment of the adjacent propertIes to the north and south when appropnate The value of the abuttIng properties WIll not be compromIsed, and wIll likely be enhanced by the development of the project 3 The proposed development Will not adversely afJea the health or saftty or persons reSIding or working In the neIghborhood of the proposed u,!;e The reductIOn In denSIty from 8 eXistIng apartment to 4 proposed condomInIUm umts would decrease the vehIcular traffic along Bay Esplanade There are no proposed uses other than reSIdentIal that wIll have a detnmental effect on the health of persons reSiding or workmg In the neighborhood 4 The proposed development IS deSigned to minImIZe traffic congestlOn The proposed development IS deSigned to reduce the vehicular traffic through the reductIOn of umts from 8 apartments to 4 condommIUms The reqUIred parkmg wIll be provided on-Site and mamly WIthm an enclosed parkmg garage 5 The proposed development lS conSIstent wllh the commumty character of the lmmedzate vlclmty of the parcel proposedfor development The parcels Immediately to the north and south are currently multi-famIly developments The parcel to the east contams the approved LaRtsa I multl-fanllly project Therefore the project IS consIstent With the eXIstmg and proposed uses, current zonmg uses, and the future land use plan 6 The desIgn of the proposed development minImIZeS adverse eJJect~, mcludmg Visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operatlOn Impacts The project mInImiZeS the acoustic and olfactory Impacts of the project by constructmg a 6-foot high concrete wall along the south and north property hnes Landscape buffers, a parkmg garage and the wall along the north, and south property hnes minImize the vIsual Impacts The project only contams 4 resIdentIal umts, which wIll not mclude any busmesses EXHIBIT C ATTACHED DWELLINGS FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA 1. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot area will not result in a buildmg which is out of scale wIth eXIsting buildmgs in the InUnedIate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The proposed project is a four~story condomInIUm project consisting of only one unit per floor. The buildmg footprint fits within the existmg 6,479 s.f.lot and still provides the required open space, parking spaces. The project IS actually a reduction in denSIty from the existmg 8-unit apartment building to a 4-urut condommlUm project, thereby reducing the scale of the development on the site 2. Location. The use of the parcel proposed for development will not Involve dIrect access to an arterial street. The one dnveway access will connect to Bay Esplanade which is a local road. The project is also a reduction in unit density and vehIcular trips 3. Setbacks a The reduclIon 111 fronl \etback con!r1butes 10 a more actn'e and dynamiC street life The eXIstmg nelghborhood, which In the tounst dIstnct, is more reSidentIal in nature without an active and dynamIc street life. The project is designed to mamtam the existmg flavor and senne lifestyle of the surrounding devel opmen ts. b The reductIOn in fronl setback results In an Improved s1le plan or Improl-ed deSign and appearance The reduction In the front setback is for pavement only. The proposed building meetings the front setback requirements The pavement encroachment pro\'ides an access drive to the parking garage, two parking spaces and adequate site distance for vehicular traffic pullmg out onto Bay Esplanade. c The reductIOn m SIde and rear setback does not prevent access to Ihe rear of any buIldmg by emergency vehicles The minimum side building setback IS 76ft. which allows access to the rear of the building The requested mInImum side setback reductIOn IS for pavement which \Hll be accessIble. The rear of the buildmg WIll also be accessible through the first floor parkmg garage. d The reductIOn in side and rear setback results in an Improved slte plan, more effiCient parking or Improved deSIgn and appearance The proposed setbacks to the building and pavement allow for a 24 foot W1de driveway and 19 foot deep parking stalls and a rear patio area adjacent to the y,aterfront The project deSIgn actually lI1creases the setbacks from the current apartment development and reduces the unit density. The effects of the reductions will be minimIzed by the construction of a 6 foot high wall along the north and south property hnes 4 The design of all bUIldings compiles wIth the Tourist DIstrIct design guidelines in DIvision 5 of Article 3. The elevations of the proposed building are enclosed in this package showing all four sides of the buildmg architectural design The colors of the building are also represented in reduced color building elevations and submitted color crop paint samples .,ar .:11 U"I UJ:i:l{F' KaaCl1Y~e UeveJOF'ment 727-7B4-QOS6 1"'.2 - K"'2 '. DE im. a.rnc (f 01RT PIIB..1.M [DJrTY, FURt I)i ?C2jQ957 11~21.2002 08:4&,53 y~ 51. DED-FRM:S UIFmIUA B OOXOO [3: (12436869 I<<":l.2362 SRi:l?93 EP6:11'93 ~l~ 001 f'faS 1 $6.OC $0.00 $& 00 $ (C IDTAI..: Mil AJo11. TEMff{D. I }11 ) lWlH({' 'B{ ~ llU'JTV Cl.fR< PP.IP AM:D D \', But -;'1 r LE I\OT EY' ytNED B \' , P.ICORDIN( REQUESTED BY ANIlj WHE"'i Rl::c:O;u;ED !.{o\JL DEED TO ,~( Ann Sh<.w. <\nol'T'eya1 La.v 1445 Cou.r1 Street, $u.le 200 Oeanl aler, FJO"ldg 33756 '-- -I . CRC-V~ !'.WL TA.,'.: ST.J..TIMENTS 10 l-.l:s v'l.fgtlt:3 B Fu-u..s "r' ~ 66~ Sa\ ESfiafl3ce ,~, ~rf:;;-- Clearwater Beu~.. Fo"'da 33?'Sf- '1::'-. l/ ...--.. U I S? AC E t; 00\ E THJS LINE, Rf~ ~Q" I'" n ""fiR R Frn RDFR ''i II SF- 02-436869 Nou-21-2002 8 PINELLAS CO 8< 12362 PG 11111 i lmf [110 t!IlIllll1ll mUll) IliIlUl QUIT Cl.AI\1 DEED <ISM 17!::3 Tole W"dNSlg.iCd G"l!nlor d~lar:s I,.I.! "aJ5f~r ,ax 15 t\ 'J\ E fuS :0:1 'e:> al1.:e O'amfers the Gral)t;)rs' 'meres: In 0 hel re'v ocable hI lJ'1l 1:'N. ::;or No Cot:5lderauon, c.:I3."Ige u: '~1:Jlg on!) {' r~!l'Qr, VI..-gUlia B I'"rarJ..s "'~05e ~C~= 15 6~ B.llj< Esp ln3:k. ClearvealeJ Beach, Fhmdll &r~nt> to, \'ugmJ8 B F"uJu, TrJstee, ~\1 cs~ adcress IS the 'lime as jp"l or or r~r !.t..ccess.y J tn.~l, WIder Th~ V.rg.n13 B Fr~nks Tru51. Dated W~.It.f)fi." I" ZGOl. at.d l!l) arrendmem~ \1>~~ J, ~~ fOJ:cwmg r:a 1 ?ITPl.'r*Y 10ca ,ect lr tbe On.a')' of PN EU.AS , State ;;,f FJ Jnda, a'ld c.est. bed as fo'lows LOI 8, Block. 1", M~Ddalat SJOC1\ ISm <..r.:t 5, O!.ccocdl.1g le:r~ "'1l2;;) Cl' ;:>1e. tt-ereohs reco"ded In Pl.1!1 Bod ~Q. Page ~." PJ::t:I.c records or P[\JELl.;"S Cc...,ty, :T(nda A:l;Oll.Ol c~ Pe.,.....a:l~ 'It Par::ll.,.o or Fo IQ '\10 \'5 '~9 '15 54'; ~ 'O~, 0080 NOTF TO PRO?E~ T { AfPR,!.ISE p, ~":C: Gr-o:.rlc' ~cr;u--t; 1-4' UilC<:t I~~ .efl"U O,-L~ 1'..5!, ref:lred I;:> abo '~, the Or-mIOT has nol Icn th..J ~ beil::,;ccal ,plere,l fOT I fe ax .; enlh.e.:: to a 1c,!"'es eo1C IV'. e~tr!ft'or pU'SJa:t 0 the p'o'v.nms of f]onc.ll StJ"'Ue 196 ()<IJ 121 Execu.cd In II \n.h...... , I, P;\' E!..-AS C oun v F ooja \ llne-.S ~~~~ ~V-,\ ~_"'-_ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ , Jrt>...l J\ 0-. i....e..{ c..c. \ rzJ~~/hJ-'-' ZJ~ V rgl B Franks PRIl'....T N"'-IIrlE \'V1tne~s PRll\ T 1\1.-\ "'~E 5" A TE 8F PI ORillA )!-!. COl"'f\.IT OF Pr\ELL.o\S ) " On ~ (\..j~ befor~"-': (~, ~ S~~ , ,,",0 ary ?ubhc, p"rsonall~ appe,}re{~ Vl1g.DJ;J B FI2J'J..s, ....ho IS JJe'w1<:lly lo'O"'D::l": C ~ " ,0 ~s J:.:)j~c:::l Dr".... ....~t.-,...v 01S Idefll!fi:atlon Dnd I1C':""O ^ ledB"d to!'t.c L'at ;P>: e\e{,JI~j h. ~ame If ter .nl.horz~ q~Cll), a-r:.::3"?! l:;e- 5IgU.:J:C on we .nstr.lffi~nl k ?~.scn or:he e1tll'y upon 'beb31fof....Iu:.1 Ihe ;>ers::>[ "<'led, C:l.ecLlcd the 11;5::'".!M!::C I \.\0 Jrn2SS !:'lY h<.nd and offi :ll[ seal 0~A~ \~ NOTARY PliK1C \{~ COr;r1.SS on El.plreS J .~,~ ~1~\.M.arrlft ..."" ..t~ '?1"~4~X... ..~~9' I ~["- ;Ci/.. ,\ I, \. s: ~ l.lc::":J - - ~ . c:[!:.'I ""r::- :::=- "...,..-. "'~..- ~..' ",1r'.~= :-..;;;'" ':.~'::... ~ .,~~~ ~rJf.-~-"'''<<~C\ .............I-~E'Rj,,-jlf.f. --...r..it::O~~. CITY OF CLEARWATER loNG RANGE PlANNING DEVELOPMENT REviEW PIANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758A748 MUNICIPAl SERVICES BUnDING, 100 SmITH MYRnE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE ()27) 562-4567 FAX [J27) 562-4576 March 30, 2004 Mr KeIth Zayak, PE 101 Phlhppe Parkway, SUite 205 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 RE FLD2004-03018, 669 Bay Esplanade Dear Mr Zayak The PlannIng staff has revIewed your apphcatIon for FlexIble Development approval to permIt attached dwellmgs WIth a reductIon to the mInImum lot area from 10,000 square feet to 6,479 square feet, a reductIOn to the minImUm lot wIdth from 100 feet to 60 feet, a reductIon to the front (south) setback from 15 feet to one foot (to pavement), a reductIon to the side (north) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to pavement) and a reductIOn to the rear setback from 20 feet to SIX feet (to ?) and WIth an mcrease to bUlldmg heIght from 35 feet to 67 feet (to elevator ovenun), under the provlSlons of SectIOn 2-803 After a prelimInary reVIew of the submItted documents, staff has determmed that the appltcatIOn IS complete The Development ReVIew Commtttee Will review the appllcatIonfor sufficlency on May 6,2004, m the Plannmg Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the MUnICipal Services BUIldmg, 100 South Myrtle Avenue, m Clearwater, You or a representative must be present to answer any questIOns that the commtttee may have regardmg your applIcation Comments you WIll receIve at the DRC meetmg must be addressed and subnutted to the Planmng Department by noon on May 13, 2004 (15 caples of all suhnuttals), If you have any questIOns, please do not heSItate to call me at 727-562-4504. SIncerely, /'J?,.~ fl. ~ MIchael H Reynolds, AICP Semor Planner S \Planmng Departmen^C D B\FLEX\Pendmg casei'lUp for the next DRClBay Esplanade 669 La R,sa II (7J1Bay Esplanade 669 Complete Leller doc BRIAN J AUNCW, MAYOR COMMlSSlONFR Horr HAMlITON, VleF MAYOR,COMMI~~IONFR WHlTNFY GRAY, CO\tMl".,IQ,'.1 R FR/\NK HmUARD, COMMJ~SIONr.R * BIll 101'1"01'1 (O~tMl'>~IONI R ., r QUAI EM PI OYMrNT AND AH mMA 1 IVI AC1ION EM PI 0'1'1 It ;:~Glearwater TO: FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 Se MYRTLE A VEe, 2nd Floor CLEARW A TER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562..4865 c/Jlhl r r/.#/n( / ,4((; /f('4.RvJ '7 ~ /'fAfA/4-'i/ rf"?C .- 27 2f , FAX: Phone: - FROM: .t111 'M- ~I/ A/O UU Phone: ~ '2 - If tP :J.6 I / () ,.;to - 6 r SUBJECT: /JC,tJ 2a:? .I> () 5' t 2- 0 & t,]I /Jay g.f'/It1n~ DATE: MESSAGE: 1 c/PL qJ~ eo.;p./ ~ I I NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) /0 . . 1&& y ... 0'\ ... N ... -....I (Jl W ... (Jl co co J I 'II ' ~*.-' ~j ~I ::r :11 ~ "~ t~ ;!;! ~ a- I ~ ::;; =-~38" , ::J"" .... CD ~ ~ 0 OJ I ~,<:J,< ~" -, ... Z~ \0 oE Z L.> ;;0 -.. o -, o c -, .... ;::;. CD (f) CD -, < (') CD .... III rl- "'""" -....I eN -....I '-" " ,,1&& I , ! I . +' l' -w* I ... N o ... ... Ul CD z L iiL , <4 l' ~ Q. Q. ""l: '=D VI VI m X w 3 "E- CD () I' ," m ];0 7:l :g: ];0 -l m ;;0 ::s:: ];0 , , ... ,,-;--iilt,.1&& l' ~ '__ " o ~O "CD () () n , , "'0 , \D N goe d 0 0 ~ 0 W -....10' '-Joo '-J ... ... '-J 0 U1 cr> :. Kif w!p 7 (il :!l .....= c - -, :J :J CD 0 0..:J (1) "'00 CIJ ., , ;::).3 ilJ 0 - ., :5 CD ...... ::!l s: ~ 3 0.. ilJ ISl rl-:J o :J ..... ~ ::; 3 CD ~ 0' IT3 CD (1) IT :J ~ rtO ~ .:f CD ilJ 0..:J 0.. :J ..... ilJ :J"" :J CD '< :J ::!In CD _ 0: R- 4~ o ...... n ilJ ISl \ CD IJl 7 3 w .-+ n :J"" .-+ ::J CD :J 0' 3 w r+ o :J '< o c CD :J ,.",. CD , CD 0.. r+ :J"" CD < I1l :E O,l 1J (il .... 3 r-t o .... o (") (") C lJ O,l C'".~) o :J O,l r0 r)'1' (il :J (Jl (1) [f] CD W -, n :J'" IT I C .-+ rl- o :J , ( }> , ' IJl .-+ ,..,. :J"" W ..... I W :e; IT m Status Case Status Page 1 of5 ePermit Home View Permit or License View Parcel Plan Reviews for BCP2005-09620 Return to main case information page Add ress: Project Description: 669 BAY ESPLANADE CONSTRUCTION OF NEW CONDO BUILDING (SITE WORK ON BCP2005- 09619) Reviews: Type Received Imtia I I Approved II Status II Done By I Review Traffic Review 19/23/2005 9/23/2005 9/29/2005 IDONE I Mark Crellin 562 -4764 HOLD Stormwater Management See Elliot Shoberg 9/23/2005 10/6/2005 Review Review Comments 562-4748 below HOLD See Steve Doherty Engineering Review 9/23/2005 9/23/2005 Review Comments 562-4773 below HOLD See Rick Albee Land Resource Review 9/23/2005 10/3/2005 Review 727-562-4741 Comments below HOLD See Steven Everitt Landscape Review 10/11/2005 , 10/11/2005 Review 562- Comments 4567x2563 below HOLD See Steven Everitt Zoning Review 9/23/2005 10/11/2005 RevIew 562- Comments 4567x2563 below I nn~11 I http Ilepermlt myclearwater com/tm _ bm/tmw _ cmd pl?tmw _ cmd=svcBCPrevlew&shl_ ca 10/20/2005 Status Case Status Page 2 of5 U Review Fire Review 9/23/2005 9/30/2005 Comments LR below Gas Review 9/23/2005 DD ReView In Progress * Plumbing ReView 9/23/2005 1 I ReView In I I Progress * Mechanical ReView 9/23/2005 I I ReView In I I Progress * I Electrical ReView 19/23/2005 I I ReView In I I Progress * I BUilding ReView 19/23/2005 I 11 I ReView In I I Progress * *Appllcabfe review comments Will be displayed once the revIew IS complete Please walt until all reviews are complete before submItting reVISions Review Comments: Print "Not Met" conditions IMPORTANT! Reviews are still in progress for: Gas, Plumbing, Mechanical, Electrical, Building. Comments on completed reviews are displayed below IType II Comments IB Reviewed By Engineering 1) The fire service line cannot be be Installed on a restricted [;01 S R I line Met - 2) The fire service and domestic water lines shall be Installed Engineering by the contractor The tapping sleeve/valve and backflow EJEJ preventor Will be Installed by the City at the applicant's Met - expense Engineering 3) Driveway apron shall not extend beyond property line Not IS_R I I extended at the south property line Met 4) Sheet 9 of 10, detail for sanitary c1eanout not current City Not EJ Engineering standard for a double sweep cJeanout Detail available online Met as Index 304 Sheet 1 of 2 5) Site contractor to schedule a pre-site Inspection prior to Engineering Issuance of a bUilding permit Call the Engineering EJEJ Construction InspectIons Field OfFice at (727)462-6126 to Met ~ schedule an appointment 6) Any new concrete driveway apron(s) constructed Within the nght-oF-way shall be a minimum 6" thick fibrous concrete, Not Englneenng and a minimum 3000 pSI With 6" x 6" / 10 x 10 W w f Met S_R [Sidewalks shall NOT to be constructed Within thiS apron area (s)J Englneenng 7) A separate nght-oF-way permit Will be reqUired for all work ~ Within the right-of-way of any ofthe adJacent street{s) that http //epenmt myclearwater com/tm_bm/tmw_cmd pI?tmw_cmd=svcBCPrevlew&shl_ca 10/20/2005 Status Case Status Page 3 of 5 I I are assigned to the city See Don Melone (727)562-4798 In l:::J1 I Room #220 at the MSB (MunICipal Services Building) 8) The City of Clearwater, at the applicant's expense, Will remove/relocate any/all water meters that have to be Not Englneenng relocated as part of this development, Including reclaim water Met S_R meters (No meters shall be located Within any Impervious areas) 9) Need a copy of an approved health permit for the Englneenng installation of the domestic water main pnor to Issuance of a EJEJ bUilding permit The health permit application formes) can be Met - found at www dep state fl us/water/dnnkmgwater/forms htm 10) Need to submit 5 sets of as-bullts that are Signed and Englneenng sealed by a profeSSional engineer registered In the State of EEJ FlOrida, pnor to any C 0 being Issued Public Met - Works/Englneenng to field Inspect as-bullts for accuracy 11) Development Right-of-Way Impact Fees per Ordinance Number 5969-96 (Section 1 3 e) [PubliC utility connection - $150 00 (No pavement cut, fee per each utilIty Involved and Not Englneenng per each connection )] [PubliC utility connection - $200 00 Met S_R (Pavement cut fee per each utility Involved and per each connection )] See Don Melone (727)562-4798 In Room #220 at the MSB (Municipal Services BUilding) Sanitary sewer connection shall be made to eXisting sewer Not Steve Engineering Doherty lateral to eliminate proposed road cut Met 562-4773 2-lnch potable water line should be connected to 6-lnch water Not Steve Engineering line (fire) after fire hydrant assembly to aVOid additional Met Doherty pavement cut 562-4773 Fire Department Connection (F DC) shall be located a ~ Steve Englneenng minimum of is-feet from the front face of build and Within Met Doherty 4Q-feet of a fire hydrant assembly (F H A ) 562-4773 Sidewalks and Sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project shall be desrgned and constructed consistent With City Not Steve Englneenng of Clearwater Contract SpeCifications and Standards Index Met Doherty # 109, Including the A D A (Truncated domes per DOT. 562-4773 Index #304 ) EJ By order of Chief of Construction, NO APPROVALS on Bay Esplanade until water supply IS Improved AI! questions regarding EJD thiS fire comment should be addressed to ChIef of Construction S Met C Strong who can be reached at 727-562-4327 ext 3039 J Fire I ProVide fire flow calculations by Fire Protection Engineer ~ILR I Met EJ PrOVIde plans for automatic wet standpipe system as required by [;]D NFPA 1 Must Include fire pump and generator as back up power source for pump and elevator These must be Installed above BFE Met IFlre II Show eXit signs on plans II ~:~ II LR I I Fire I Why no sprinkler coverage In cabanas, vestibule, staIr lobbies, ~ LR trash shute, elevator shaft Met I Fire I A fire riser IS shown In the trash room move to another locatIOn ~ lR Met I II II II I http //epermlt myclearwater com/tm_bm/trnw_crnd pl?tmw_cmd=svcBCPrevlcw&shl~ca 10120/2005 Status Case Status Page 4 of 5 IFlre II Provide stair details II ~:~ II lR I Provide guardra II details NFPA 101,7 2 2 6 2 requ Ires visual ~ Fire protectiOn for sta Irs more than 3 stones this protection must be at least 48" In hleght Met Fire Provide fire alarm plans [;01 LR I Met I Fire I Show that smoke detectors are to be interconnected I~:~ IllR I land IThe tree survey,s ,ncomplete ~ Rick Albee Resource 727~562- Met 4741 Land IAPPIY for a tree removal penml ~ Rick Albee Resource 727-562- Met 4741 Land ~ Rick Albee Resource Insure that the erosion control IS repaired and functIoning Met 727-562- 4741 ~ Elliot Stormwater Please submit CIvIl plans for review Met Shoberg 562-4748 EJ Steven Zoning ReView EJ Eventt SEALED SURVEY Met 562- 4567x2563 EJ Zoning ReView Steven EJ Eventt SHEET SP1 01 - ADD DISTANCES TO PROPERTY LINES - Met 562- REDLINING ACCEPTABLE 4567x2563 EJ Steven Zoning ReView EJ Eventt COLOR SAMPLES Met 562- 4567x2563 Zoning ReView Steven Zoning 5 That the SWFWMD permit or letter of exception be EJ Everitt provided to Planning staff prior to any bUilding permit Met 562- Issuance 4567x2563 Zoning ReView Steven 14 That the applicant Install a six-foot bnck wall along the Not Everitt Zoning south property line, consistent With the revised site plan, so Met 562- as to redirect pedestrian traffic onto the adjacent southern 4567x2563 property SHOW ON SITE PLAN Steven landscape LANDSCAPE DATA TABLE REQUIRED EJ Everitt Met 562- 4567x2563 Steven Zomng Zoning Review EJ Everitt SITE DATA TABLE Met 562- 4567x2563 I II 1111 Steven I http //epermlt myc1earwater com/tm bm/tmw cmd pl?tmw cmd=svcBCPrevlew&shl ca - - - ~ 10/20/2005 Status Case Status Page 5 of5 PLAN APPEARS TO SHOW FIFTEEN TREES OF ONE SPECIES l;J Eventt Landscape MINIMUM OF TWO SPECIES ARE REQUIRED Met 562- 4567x2563 Steven Landscape NOTHING OVER THIRTY INCHES IS ALLOWED IN THE Not Eventt TWENTY FOOT SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLES Met 562- 4567x2563 I ~nd=pe I Steven CURBS NEED TO BE SHOWN Not Eventt Met 562- 4567x2563 Steven Landscape THREE LANDSCAPE PLANS NEED TO BE SUBMITTED EJ Everitt Met 562- 4567x2563 I wHAT IS THE SYMBOL (RI) , I Not Scott Landscape Kurleman 562- Met 4567x2504 Scott Landscape WHY IS (IV) LISTED ON THE PLANT LIST? Not Kurleman Met 562- 4567x2504 Scott Landscape WHAT IS THE AREA BETWEEN THE REAR DECK AND THE SOD Not Kurleman AREA? Met 562- 4567x2S04 Back to Search If you have any questIons or suggestIons for our Site, please contact Development Services at (727) 562-4567 or E-mail us CIty: of Clearwater Home Pag.!L Review City of Clearwater Web Site Legal Disclaimers h tip II eperm I t myel ea rwater com/tm _ b J nltm w _ cmd pI ?tmw _ cmd=svcB CPrevlew &shl_ ca 10120/2005 CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVE CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 PHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 CASE SUMMARY Be P2005-09620 669 BAY ESPLANADE LA RISSA II CONSTRUCTION OF NEW CONDO BUILDING (SITE WORK ON BCP2005-09619) PEOPLE Role Owner/Property LA RISA DEVELOPMENT CO LLC 880 MANDALAY AVE # C 908 CLEARWATER, FL 33767 BRENT A LEITER HUNT CONSTRUCTION GROUP INC 7650 W COURTNEY CAMPBELL CSWY #1150 TAMPA, FL 33607 Contractor FEES Clearing & Grubbing Permit Fee Plans Review Fee State Radon Surcharge Transportation Impact Fee Total Assessed Amount $1000 $8,050 00 $5,350 00 $30 62 $000 $13,44062 Amount Paid $1000 $780 00 $5,350 00 $000 $000 $6,14000 CONDITIONS PHONE 727-785-4070 FAX No Fax PHONE 813-287-6301 FAX 813-281-8958 Balance Due $000 $7,270 00 $000 $30 62 $000 $7,30062 All conditions must be met before a permit can be Issued C OF 0 CONDITION - ZONING Not Met 11 That all proposed utilities (from the rights-of-way to the proposed bUildings) be placed underground and installation of condUit(s) along the entire length of the site's street frontages be completed prior to the Issuance of the first certificate of occupancy Not Met 13 That the condominium plat be recorded with Plnellas County prior to the first Certificate of Occupancy - SUBMIT COPIES r IForms\lnfoSummary rpt Be P2005-09620 669 BAY ESPLANADE Engmeermg Review Not Met 1) The fire service line cannot be be Installed on a restncted line Not Met 2) The fire service and domestic water lines shall be Installed by the contractor The lapping sleeve/valve and backflow preventor will be Installed by the City at the applicant's expense Not Met 3) Dnveway apron shall not extend beyond property line extended at the south property line Not Met 4) Sheet 9 of 10, detail for sanitary c1eanout not current City standard for a double sweep c1eanout Detail available onhne as Index 304 Sheet 1 of 2 Not Met 5) Site contractor to schedule a pre-site Inspection prior to Issuance of a bUilding permit Call the Engineering Construction Inspections Field Office at (727)462-6126 to schedule an appointment Not Met 6) Any new concrete driveway apron(s) constructed within the right-of-way shall be a minimum 6" thick fibrous concrete, and a m In 1m u m 3000 ps I with 6" x 6" / 10 x 1 0 w w f [sIdewalks shall NOT to be constructed within thiS apron area(s)] Not Met 7) A separate right-of-way permit will be required for all work within the right-of-way of any of the adjacent street(s) that are assigned to the city See Don Melone (727)562-4798 In Room #220 at the MSB (Municipal Services Building) Not Met 8) The City of Clearwater, at the applicant's expense, will removelrelocate any/all water meters that have to be relocated as part of thiS development, including reclaim water meters (No meters shall be located within any Impervious areas) Not Met 9) Need a copy of an approved health permit for the Installation of the domestic water main prior to Issuance of a bUilding permit The health permit application form(s) can be found at W'NIN dep state fI us/water/dnnklngwater/forms htm Not Met 10) Need to submit 5 sets of as-bUllts that are signed and sealed by a professional engineer registered In the State of Flonda, prior to any C 0 being Issued Public Works/Englneenng to field Inspect as-bUllts for accuracy Not Met 11) Development Right-of-Way Impact Fees per Ordinance Number 5969~96 (Section 1 3 e) [Public utility connection - $150 00 (No pavement cut, fee per each utility Involved and per each connection )] [Public utility connecllon - $20000 (Pavement cut fee per each utility Involved and per each connectlon)J See Don Melone (727)562-4798 In Room #220 at the MSB (Municipal Services BUilding) Not Met Sanitary sewer connection shall be made to eXisting sewer lateral to eliminate proposed road cut Not Met 2-Inch potable water line should be connected to 6-Inch water line (fire) after fire hydrant assembly to avoid additional pavement cut Not Met Fire Department Connection (F DC) shall be localed a minimum of 15-feet from the front face of bUild and within 40-feet of a fire hydrant assembly (F H A ) Not Met Sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project shall be deSigned and constructed consistent with City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index #109, Including the A 0 A (Truncated domes per DOT Index #304 ) Fire ReView Not Met By order of Chief of Construction, NO APPROVALS on Bay Esplanade until water supply IS Improved All questions regarding thiS fire comment should be addressed to Chief of Construction S C Strong who can be reached at 727-562-4327 ext 3039 Not Met Provide fire flow calculations by Fire Protection Engineer Not Met Provide plans for automatic wet standpipe system as required by NFPA 1 Must Include fire pump and generator as back up power source for pump and elevator These must be Installed above BFE Show eXit signs on plans Why no sprinkler coverage In cabanas, vestibule, stair lobbies, trash shute, elevator shaft A fire riser IS shown In the trash room move to another location Provide stair details Provide guardrail details NFPA 101.72262 requires visual protection for stairs more than 3 stones thiS protection must be at least 48" In hleght Not Met Provide fire alarm plans Not Met Show that smoke detectors are to be Interconnected Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met land Resource ReView Not Met The tree survey IS Incomplete Not Met Apply for a tree removal permit Not Met Insure that the erosion control IS repaired and functioning r \FormsllnfoSummary rpl BCP2005-09620 669 BAY ESPLANADE Landscape Review Not Met LANDSCAPE DATA TABLE REQUIRED Not Met PLAN APPEARS TO SHOW FIFTEEN TREES OF ONE SPECIES MINIMUM OF TWO SPECIES ARE REQUIRED Not Met NOTHING OVER THIRTY INCHES IS ALLOWED IN THE TWENTY FOOT SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLES CURBS NEED TO BE SHOWN THREE LANDSCAPE PLANS NEED TO BE SUBMITTED wHAT IS THE SYMBOL (RI)? WHY IS (IV) LISTED ON THE PLANT LIST? WHAT IS THE AREA BETWEEN THE REAR DECK AND THE SOD AREA? Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Storm water ReView Not Met Please submit CIVil plans for review Zonmg ReView Not Met SEALED SURVEY Not Met SHEET SP1 01 - ADD DISTANCES TO PROPERTY LINES - REDLlNING ACCEPTABLE Not Met COLOR SAMPLES Not Met 5 That the SWFWMD permit or letter of exception be provided to Planning staff prior to any bUilding permit Issuance Not Met 14 That the applicant Install a slx~foot brick wall along the south property line, consistent with the reVised site plan, so as to redirect pedestrian traffic onto the adjacent southern property SHOW ON SITE PLAN Not Met SITE DATA TABLE ACTIVITIES Date 1 Date 2 Date 3 Application received 9/23/2005 Need Clearing/Grubbing Insp 9/23/2005 BUilding ReView 9/23/2005 Stormwater Management ReView 9/23/2005 10/6/2005 see conditions F Ire ReView 9/23/2005 9/30/2005 see conditions Recorded NOC Plumbing ReView 9/23/2005 Land Resource ReView 9/23/2005 1 0/3/2005 See Conditions Mechanical ReView 9/23/2005 Electncal ReView 9/23/2005 Gas ReView 9/23/2005 Engineering ReView 9/23/2005 9/23/2005 See Conditions Traffic ReView 9/23/2005 9/23/2005 9/29/2005 Zoning ReView 9/23/2005 10/11/2005 SEE CONDITIONS Done Dlsp By LRN -..., HOLD Elliot Shoberg HOLD LR HOLD Rick Albee HOLD Steve Doherty DONE Mark Crellin HOLD STE r \Forms\lnfoSummary rpt Be P2005-09620 669 BAY ESPLANADE Need No Tree Landscape Review SEE CONDITIONS 9/23/2005 9/23/2005 10/11/2005 10/11/2005 HOLD STE r IFormsllnfoSummary rpl ~ ""~ ~1lU"'1 '1' I.....,.~ "l ,~' ,<' ~t('"" "':<' ~L! ~\~ q r 11,,: tyl"o- . ""-'c., . ,,~,~~ q.,~.....:..~ '~~1i71 ~J~-T"r_!.'jf'~j>........ "e.-""., ~',"m <:t~"" I Ii""~":.~"""-::' )~~\......gf?Vll~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ - = - ~~"1i;;ih~~ ",r;;;;,t -=-:=--. ~ ,,'$~~ B::'~1i) ,<>IP' ";.-=-- ""tt:'-~ ..~?".--~- ,\~:,..~~ =" ~- -----"'~'\." ~, ~ -v.rirfl~ ~ il-V"" ~~""QJ11E~, ll;~ ul"SDlJPJl CITY OF CLEAR\\XlA'rER~ LONG RM1GF PlJ.NNING DEVIl OPMENT RLvIEW PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, ClEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICeS BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MVRll.E AVENuE, CLEARWATER, FlORIDA 33756 TnFPH01><f (727) 567,4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 October 22, 2004 Mr KeI th Zayak KeIth Zayak & ASSOCIates, Inc 101 PhIlIppe Parkway Safety Harbor, Flonda 34695 COpy RE Development Order - Case FLD2004-03018 - 669 Bay Esplanade Dear Mr Zayak ThIS Jetter constItutes a Development Order pursuant to SectIOn 4-206D 6 of the CommunIty Development Code, On October 19, 2004, the Commumty Development Board reviewed your FleXIble Development apphcatIon to penrut attached dwelhngs With (1) a reductIOn of the 111lmmum lot area from 10,000 square feet to 6,479 square feet, (2) a reductIon of nummum lot WIdth from 100 feet to 60 feet, (3) a reductIOn of the front setback from 15 feet to 569 feet (to pavement); (4) a reductIOn of the SIde (south) setback from 10 feet to four feet to extenor stans; (5) a reductIon of the SIde (north) setback from 10 feet to 6.72 feet (to bUIldmg), (6) a reductIon of the rear setback from 20 feet to 10 feet (to wooden deck); and (7) a bUIldmg heIght mcrease from 35 feet to 51.83 feet from FEMA to nudpomt of the roof under the provISIons of SectIon 2- 803 B. for the SIte at 669 Bay Esplanade Based on the appl1catlOn and the Staff recommendatIon, the Commumty Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the appl1catIon WIth the followmg condItIons CondItIons of Approval 1 That the fmal deSIgn and color of the bUIldmg be conSIstent WIth the conceptual elevatIOns subrmtted to, or as modIfied by, the CDB, 2 That boats moored at the eXlstmg and any future docks be for the exclUSIve use by the reSidents and/or guests of the condommIUms; 3 That all slgnage meet Code and be archItecturally-mtegrated mto the deSIgn of the SIte and bUIldmg, 4 That there be no Jet sla or other lIke watercraft rental busmesses at thiS locatIon; 5 That the SWFVIMD perrrut or letter of exceptIOn be proVided to Plannmg staff pnor to any bUIldmg penmt Issuance, 6 That a revIsed landscape plan be sublTIltted to the satIsfactIon of Planmng staff, pnor to any bUIldmg perrrut Issuance, 7 That a revIsed tree survey be submItted to the satIsfactIOn of Planmng staff, pnor to any bUIldmg penrut Issuance; BRIM! J AUNG~T, 1VLWOR COMMI~"IOI\'ER HoYT HAMI [101\', VleF /I,1AYOR CO\1 ~tl"~ION[R \l7H[T~[Y G RAY, COI1 II [S~IOf, FR rRANK HIBBARD, COM~t1~STONFR * Bll I JONSON, COI10111..,''IOf,1 R "EQ UN EMPI OVMfNT AND At II RMA 1 IVI Ac I ION r~j rT O\'TR" October 22,2004 Keith Zayak, Page Two 8 That the fIfe servIce pIpelme InstallatIOn be addressed to the satisfactIOn of Engmeeong staff, poor to bUildIng penrut Issuance, 9 That Open Space, RecreatIOn Land and RecreatIOn FaCIlity Impact fees be satisfIed poor to the Issuance of bUildIng penruts or fmal plat, whichever occurs fIrst; 10 That all FIre Department reqUirements be addressed pnor to bUlldmg penrut Issuance, 11 That all proposed utIlIties (from the oghts-of-way to the proposed bUlldmgs) be placed underground and mstallatlOn of condUlt(s) along the entire length of the site's street frontages be completed poor to the Issuance of the first certificate of occupancy, 12 That Traffic Impact Fees be detenmned and patd pnor to CertIficate of Occupancy Issuance, 13 That the condommIUm plat be recorded With Pmellas County pnor to the fIrst Certificate of Occupancy; and 14 That the applicant mstall a SIx-foot bock wall along the south property hne, conSIstent WIth the revIsed site plan, so as to redIrect pedestnan traffIC onto the adjacent southern property Pursuant to SectIOn 4-407, an applIcatIOn for a bUIldmg penrut shall be made wIthm one year of FleXible Development approval (by October 19, 2005) All reqUIred certificates of occupancy shall be obtamed WithIn one year of the date of Issuance of the bUIldmg pernnt TIme frames do not change WIth succeSSIve owners, The Commumty Development CoordInator may grant an extenSIOn of time for a penod not to exceed one year and only wIthm the oogmal penod of valIdity, The Commumty Development Board may approve one additIOnal extenSlOn of time after the Commumty Development CoordInator's extenSIOn to InItiate a bUIldmg permIt applicatIOn The Issuance of thIS Development Order does not relIeve you of the neceSSIty to obtatn any bUIldmg permIts or pay any Impact fees that may be reqUIred. In order to faCIlItate the Issuance of any penrut or lIcense affected by thIS approval, please bnng a copy of thiS letter with you when applymg for any pernnts or lIcenses that reqUire thIS poor development approval. AddItIonally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (FleXIble Development) may be InItiated pursuant to SectlOn 4-502 B by the apphcant or by any person granted party status wIthm 14 days of the date of the Commumty Development Board meetIng The filmg of an applIcation/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decIslOn pendmg the final detennmatlOn of the case, The appeal penod for your case explIes on November 2,2004 If you have any questlOns, please do not heSitate to call Michael H Reynolds, AICP, Planner m, at 727-562-4836 You can access zonmg mfonnatIOn for parcels wIthm the City through our wehslte www clearwater-fl com, October 22, 2004 KeIth Zayak, Page Three Smcerely, , ~~ CynthIa H, Tarapam, AICP Planmng DIrector S \Planmng Departmenf\C D B\FLEJNnactlve or FWlshed AppllcaMns\Bay Esplanade 669 W. Rlsa II (T) 10 J 9 04 CDS - ApprovedlBay Esplanade 669 DeveJopmenr Order October 22,2004 doc " ) ') 'if Jtfll-=:-O-~ ~ ~~~ (, I\L or 'NF ~ ~\)~\ ~~'ULo.o<Q.~;:~ ~",~", -<'-~'7- ~ ~ .,' I ~-,...':. ..€:Jj,'.\ I, ,":.!? '" ~~" {>, ..~:-:- - ",- g~ ':;~;. - -~: ~~~ --==.. "~,,, -..:r$.~~__"'~~~\\ ....~~}J1ER ~fl~ '14';"qpJi,;1 CITY OF CLEARWATER loNG RANGE PlANNING DEVELOPMENT REviEW PIANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWAITR, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVlCES BUIlDING, 100 SOUTH MYRllE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORlDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562.4567 FAX (127) 562-4576 October 22, 2004 Mr KeIth Zayak Keith Zayak & AssocIates, Inc 101 PhIlIppe Parkway Safety Harbor, Flonda 34695 FilE RE Development Order - Case FLD2004-030 18 - 669 Bay Esplanade Dear Me, Zayak, ThiS letter constItutes a Development Order pursuant to SectIOn 4-206D,6 of the Commumty Development Code, On October 19, 2004, the Commuruty Development Board reviewed your FleXIble Development applIcatton to penrut attached dwelhngs WIth (1) a reductIon of the mInImum Jot area from 10,000 square feet to 6,479 square feet; (2) a reductIOn of nummum lot wIdth from 100 feet to 60 feet, (3) a reductIOn of the front setback from 15 feet to 569 feet (to pavement), (4) a reductIon of the sIde (south) setback from 10 feet to four feet to extenor statrs, (5) a reductIOn of the side (north) setback from 10 feet to 672 feet (to bmldmg), (6) a reductIOn of the rear setback from 20 feet to 10 feet (to wooden deck); and (7) a bUIldmg heIght mcrease from 35 feet to 51 83 feet from FEMA to rmdpomt of the roof under the prOVIsIOns of SectIOn 2- 803 B. for the SIte at 669 Bay Esplanade Based on the applIcatIon and the Staff recommendatton, the Commumty Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the applIcatIon wIth the followmg conrntIons ConditIons of Approval 1 That the fmal deSign and color of the bUlldmg be conSistent WIth the conceptual elevatIOns subrrutted to, or as modtfled by, the eDB, 2 That boats moored at the eXIstIng and any future docks be for the exclusive use by the reSIdents and/or guests of the condormmums, 3 That all slgnage meet Code and be archItecturally-mtegrated mto the deSIgn of the site and bUlldmg, 4 That there be no Jet skt or other hke watercraft rental busmesses at thiS location, 5 That the SWFWNID penmt or letter of exceptIOn be proVided to Plannmg staff pnor to any bUildmg penmt Issuance, 6 That a revised landscape plan be subnutted to the satIsfactIOn of Plannmg staff, pnor to any bUIldmg penmt Issuance, 7 That a revIsed tree survey be subnutted to the satlsfactlOn of Plannmg staff, pnor to any bUlldmg penmt Issuance, BRIAN J AUNGST, MA YOR"CO,\jMI~SlaNrv HaYI HAMil ION, VI(l MAYOR,COMMl~'iIONFR WHI1Nl Y GRSl, CO\lj\jh~IO)\'11{ fIlAi'<f,. HlBllAHD, COMM!~SiONl R * Bill JON"OJ'" Co,P.U""lOf'1 R "EQUAl EMPI OYMrNT ANI) All lllrv1Al IV] Ac I 10:.' BMl'l QlTR" ) ) I \J October 22,2004 KeIth Zayak, Page Two 8 That the fire servIce pipelIne mstallatlOn be addressed to the sattsfactIOn of Engmeenng staff, poor to buIldmg penmt Issuance, 9, That Open Space, RecreatIOn Land and Recreation FacIlIty Impact fees be sattsfIed poor to the Issuance of bUIldmg penmts or fmal plat, whichever occurs fIrst; 10. That all Fife Department requlfements be addressed poor to bUIldmg penmt Issuance, 11 That all proposed utilIties (from the fights-of-way to the proposed bUIldmgs) be placed underground and mstallatIon of condUIt(s) along the entlfe length of the SIte's street frontages be completed poor to the Issuance of the fIrst certIficate of occupancy; 12 That TraffIc Impact Fees be determmed and paId poor to CertIfIcate of Occupancy Issuance, 13 That the condommmm plat be recorded WIth Pmellas County pnor to the fIrst CertIficate of Occupancy,and 14 That the applIcant Install a SIx-foot bnck wall along the south property lIne, conSIstent WIth the revIsed sIte plan, so as to redirect pedestnan traffic onto the adjacent southern property Pursuant to SectIOn 4-407, an applIcatIOn for a bUIldmg penrut shall be made wlthm one year of FleXIble Development approval (by October 19, 2005) All reqUIred certIficates of occupancy shall be obtaIned wIthm one year of the date of Issuance of the bUIldmg penrut Time frames do not change WIth successIve owners, The Commumty Development Coordmator may grant an extension of time for a penod not to exceed one year and only wlthm the oogmal penoct of vahchty, The Commumty Development Board may approve one addItIonal extenSIOn of time after the Commumty Development Coordmator's extensIOn to Imtrate a bUlldmg penrut apphcatJon The Issuance of thiS Development Order does not relIeve you of the neceSSIty to obtam any buIldmg permIts or pay any Impact fees that may be requlfed, In order to faCIlItate the Issuance of any penrut or hcense affected by thIS approval. please bong a copy of thiS letter wIth you when applymg for any permIts or hcenses that reqUlre thIS poor development approval AddltlOnally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be Imtlated pursuant to Sectron 4-502 B by the apphcant or by any person granted party status wlthm 14 days of the date of the Commumty Development Board meetmg The fIhng of an applIcatIOn/notIce of appeal shall stay the effect of the deCISIOn pendmg the fmal determmatIOn of the case The appeal penod for your case expIres on November 2, 2004 If you have any questIons, please do not heSitate to caIl MIchael H Reynolds, AICP, Planner m, at 727-562-4836 You can access zomng mfonnatIon for parcels wlthm the CIty through our webSIte www clearwater-fl com ) ) October 22, 2004 KeIth Zayak, Page Three Smcerely, ~~ Cynthia H Tarapam, AICP Planmng Duector 5 \Planmng Deparlmenf\C D IJ\FLEJNnactlve or FlIll~hed AppllcarlOn~\Bay E~planade 669 La Run /l (T) 101904 CDS, ApprovetNJay E~plallade 669 Development Order October 22, 2004 doc b;:, l'il ~ :::- ~ ~ ..., ~ ~.., ~ , I , Ir- __ II -__....~ 1. II -I~ .... - - _ 11 II :~-= ~~ ~~~ -= ~ ~ ~ I~~-....-___~ _ ~r~ =--i\l .1" #- ""':--~ ~\ I' - - - ..: J I ~_,;'--,~Lt ----.....~ I '...... ~"<t . cI ~ c-'j v. ..... ~ (", 1 ~ ~..."".J... I:?} 'f I '- ~V.p;. ~1i-r ,,"',., " Jo r! t~~ "'~ /';;r.fJ ~ \.. t" : I <V ~ j~.t. 1"-... <- ,( 'r ...() C~ :p\{.-) ( " IJ-~ ~ ~ ;'-'0:1:.; '1 __A ~ ~ I 'I j.) -l.'\...... l' ,. ;; J~~l-... 1 ". ......,. l' ~ "9. ...:t J .... 1 / " ~~ -,( ~ " /" \~ - ~ ~ .r ~ , , I I , , J ~ " I .' .' ' , I , ) i ' , , , J j , t / I / ~ I I I' t ?f!~.. l : r1 , . L ~ q \ ~ ~ :::-- ~ S ~ & ~ '"0> ... ~ ~ l::l ... m ... ~ l::l g.. I , , " \ \ , , , ~ ~ J : , , ....--.... ~!5ig.Ss:-~~3g OOOPlO:a.O'O:::I c..oSl'<': S..........(;" ....., 0 ~:::I' ~ s: :3 o~g:::l_O (1)'0_ O-llJO:a.O"I-1S......VJ ::IVlj::;.........-O...... ~(\l' o..~ ~ :::I<-g(1)Pl ::;.ott....,lJQ~~......t,ll(') _Pl(J'QO ..........,t,ll~i:r' o ~ ::r'O"" - - .... ::Is:.O....,SS~:::I~cr' (1) ~ ~ "El (1) :;. '<': O"'iPJ(1)O.......~S-O """2.::I:::I<C:<::OOH l:ll 0........ g :::.:::' X;:-' !:::t ".... po ...... I--- {/J ~ 11,.11 ;:i~cr' (1)0 !:lVlVJ 000l...... C ;::lO- tn ...... ~ ::r S. 0C1 cr' l:ll :::I (JQ ...... '-<: ~ 0 Vl ::::r 0 ::::lJQ ::::I ~s-~l:lls~-Q'OO~Pl~~('j'Ot::l~~~g. SOl~[(;"0~:::I~~8~~=S~~~::rgo ~8S- :::I~0~Vl~~Pl~~8l:llggnottl Olqqg.~O OO(1)Q..Rg ~o..o~~::r.....,g :::IOl:ll(1)~<"'i.....,.....,OO ......~p (1) Vl(')~ Plg~ 0(1)0l ......::I(')......(1)~X.... ::r3::r::r 0.::::1 -. ;;::: < ......,."'i '" ~ ~'O ' 8 5 ;:;!::; O......J Pl Pl ~ (1) O"~~ ~20~~~~'"~0~~<=~l:ll ~::::l~~~"",,(1)~ ~0~cr'81......,('jOOS~~ Q&<:3~::r::::l::r8S 0(1)::::1- ~ O~l:ll gg~~gO=~S~S2~~2~~Pl3~[9o l:ll~;::l ......~PlG""" 2~(1) ....Pl Pl~~"'~ 0....... l:ll 0 -.. ~ .'"'1 - :::: (JQ '- (') 0 _ - ;:::t;::r O~~......,~O (1)~::::l- O"""<(')(')-~!:l-G Gg :::1- <U (ii ......Go::T'O -p(')O ?S::::l~~~O~:3Vl qo..s~s~~g=~ o ~ 0 ~ - 0 <" g- l:ll l:ll ~ OIl 5 (1) 0 S 0 ::r,<,: '" ...... (1)o::l.~<"'G"'::I;:I~rii g:::lO(;"OO~O ::::I ~::r II> (1) 0..0'<': p..::r_ Pl Vl ......::::1 ......0........,::: ....., ...... 0\ D ~ ~ Q ~ .... II> ..., ~ C :::: i} -~- - f J~ ~ " j 'i ...."0...... tl)...... "'i ~-II> -...... ~ 8..8g-~OrAg~S-g5'" O<o.n~o.O"Plcr'Pl"'~ < - (1) 0 ::>' (!) ...... g.. ro -0""" 0 ~ OO"<PO;:l..... <:: O~2.(;"c::::t~$(;lPO's.ttI 'g 0 0 S ~ e.'" t::l~ 0 S~::! p3'O"OVJ l:llCllO"~o..c:lJQ g03to~('jp"'g~ :::...;:r ...... 0 Cll - ::: E. o..dQ c P- Pl e- ~ :::: g 2.. ~ 6.. ~::::I ~ Cll O.a ;e. ::T' 0 - 0 c: ('j ........ 0 ,,~ III III .....,....... 3 ~ :=.: e:....l g(JQ a ...., .... ....- (I> I>' 0.. _ '-" j;3 0 ('Dl:llg:"'a;:i"'::::Ia;:I:::IO 'E' Vl ~.::r '" (JQ O'~ 0 S &::! - i:r' -, ~ "'i .... Pl ::l :::t < (;l f:l 0 0 0 :3 ...... Vlu :a. 0.. 0 Cll 0..0 P '" Pl ::r.uPl ('D::I ~ o.e.cr' '" 0 """p "'~. 'O"O-og.",~S~ Pll:ll e;~~?0~li"~~~[[;j st:rO a::: e-'<: Cll (;"o..qO (JQ::I5;:::onf!."'.... Plo... ......(JQ... N::\. i:r'o ~ ~ nf;; 0 t:T ~ 0.. =- '0 tl) 0 _ <: PlPl(ll I tl)i::l::!'-<:....,n(1) ...... (') "'i ....;::l ~ 0::::1- ~:::...!:a. ~g ('D Cll'g: -::::I.......g - .::; 0 ~ 0... ('j g ...., ::: Pl "0 0 = ~ = 0 0 0 ':!I cr' 0... 0 0... cr'aVJ::! ~:3 '"'I)Sl ~ o'g ~ ~g5~Si~@~ ~e- tn (JQ ;=.. ~ i:r' :;. (JQ 0. (ll OJ 0 0......0.0 _::>'(1)::::I"'iO'" n. g- 0"" <: O? rii _ dQ Vl S Pl (tlO~~Pl......~P"'VlPl (;" q0;9 '"0 =--;s (;".g 0 ~ S = ~grii~9--;.~So~~S ;::::-::I_"'i_<:: 0;'(1) '""I 0 Erg o~ ~ ;=fe-a g ;}s [ . , " -----.... G;Sg" g~s: p (tl _ g:;:;..= '< 0.. ~ ~ E.tl ~ sao.. 0E.g. ::::- yn- (1) ...... - - .-+, 0 o P (') ::I 0 0 Pl ...... ::::I ::: _ 0 o..SS :::I '0 ~ III 0 n ~ '" <: o..~l:ll GO""- <: _c (1) u(1) 0 0......0 '00""" SPlS" o ::::I (1) ::::I C ('D ...... n ~ "OVJ ~c o :::I VJ(JQ &Q S 2'0 ::n"'i (') 0 Pl <: ::I 0 ......s """0 ~ ::I [~ --, , L , I , I J , ~ 00 El ~ - - ~ 1:1 ;- - I::l .... '" .... :I. l'l .... IDOl CD s:u ~ :::::lr c;- "'-00::::::: c:::I CD en u::2 ::::s ~-- ..~ ~~ we~~ ~~~~ ~~ I ~ -~ Jrw-\kt-tA- I_~.) i1^-'"',r ~ dk~' __ (fl ~~ ~ t ~d--t- '6 ""~ f}U- 0/ ptrlOt: . )#. lo-t. ' .~u ~ vJV ~ vr-D~ -l-""~-- _ ~ fA ~ l . ~- /' '('rJ'^f(.~ ~ ~ /oJA,~ ~~ . bf1/R- . ~~ ~~ _ ~~? ~J~ ~ ..r ) ~ tJJ:v~ l' / 1t11~ r~ I~ 'f ~ ~ 0....0 1 ./ ~ ~ vr~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ (1..r P- Oft' l..()' . __ ,lfJr- ~lA'rY ~ J b . . . i (Y ~ J] .~ '. ~:---- h6 (f' . ~... \' o ..." v. .. ORIGINAL EXHIBIT A DESCRIPTION OF REQUESTS . ReductJon of mInImum lot area from J 0,000 s f to 6,479 & f o Reduction of minImum lot WIdth from 100 feet to 60 feet . Reduce front setback from 15 feet to 6 foot rnllumum . Reduce south side setback from 10 feet to 0 mInImum vi. Reduce north sIde setback from] 0 feet to 8 feet mmlmum . Reduce rear setback from 20 feet to to feet mmnnum ,j. Increa<;e bmldmg heIght from 35 feet to 51 83 feet from FEMA to roofmldpomt TOr n:nr luu -.JUl1, 2004 \ ~AJ.i'I\RtNU &. OE\lElOPMENl S \JC~ I em Of Ct '=.ARWA1ER ~ riLE COpy Im~~ WJ EXHIBIT B 1 h.i"l\!r.1IN ~ ,_ GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA RESPO~~S;'~~~~l~~,g~~fg~sIlC~ J The proposed development of the land wlll be In harmony wah the scale, bulk, wverage, density and character of a4Jacent properties m whIch if IS lo(ated Rather than bemg m hannony with the character of the existmg older multI-family projects located adjacent to the site, the project WIll set a new standard for the neIghborhood, sImIlar to LaRlsa I The proposed project will however mamtam the character of Clearwater Bea(,h With the proposed MedIterranean architectural theme and small-scale condommlUm development The project does not deViate from the penmtted uses ltl the Tounst Zonmg Distnct and represents a decrease In del1.aty from the eXlstmg 8-ul1It apartment complex to 4 condomInIUm limts The character of the project IS an upscale condommlUm development With upgraded architectural fimshes and textures. 2 The proposed development wdl not hmder Of dIscourage the appropriate development and u~e of a4Jacent land and bwldIngs or significantly lmpQ1r the value thereof The proposed development IS consistent with the eXlstmg surroundmg and proposed land U'les The project will be consistent With the re-development of LaRIsa I to the east, and set a pOSItive example for the redevelopment of the adjacent propertIes to the north and south when appropnate The value of the abuttlllg propertIes will not be comproml'led, and will hkely be enhanced by the development of the project 3 The proposed development wIll not adversely affect the health or ~afety or persons re<;idmg or workmg m the neIghborhood of the proposed use The reduction m denSIty from 8 eXl'ltmg apartment to 4 proposed condomimum umts would decrease the vehIcular traffic along Bay Esplanade There are no proposed uses other than resldent131 that WIll have a detnmental effect on the health of persons residmg or workmg III the nelghborhood 4 The propO'ied development IS deSIgned to mInImIZe traffic congestIOn The proposed development IS deSIgned to reduce the vehicular traffic through the reductIOn of umts from 8 apartments to 4 condommmms The reqUired parkmg will be provided on-sIte and mamly wlthm an enclosed parkmg garage 5 The pr()po~ed development IS conslMent wah the commumty (haracter of the lmmedwte Vlumty of the parcel proposed for development "1 he parcels unmediately to the north and south are currently multi-faIntly developments The parcel to the east contams the approved LaRIsa I multI-famIly r ~ y, .' prOject Therefore the project I., conSIstent with the eXIstmg and proposed uses, wrrent zonmg usee;, and the future land use plan 6 The de:Jlgn of the proposed development mmlmlzes adverse effeu~, mcludmg vl')twl acou~tlC and olfactory and hour<; oj operatIOn Impacts The project mInimIZe.;; the atoustlc and olfactory Impact., of the project by constructmg a 6-foot high fence along the south property hnc Landscape buffers, a parkmg garage and the fence along the n;Mh, ajt,d south property hnes mInImlZC the vIsual Impacts The project only contams 4 tesldentml UilltS, whIch will not mclude any busmesses ~--"'-... ~::~: ~l\~ \1 G, tlQ?'i,U" S,C, \ rU~I~N8.g, ~~~~1ER_ -~ CDB Meetmg Date Case Numbers Agenda Item Owner Apphcant ReprcsentatJ ve Address June 15. 2004 FLD2004-0 1 002/TDR2004-0 1006 E5 Husgen Properties, lnc Aqua Sun Development, LLC Mr Housh Ghovaee, Northslde Engmeenng Servlces, rnc 15-17 Somerset Street and 16 Cambna Street CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: EXISTING ZONINGI LAND USE: FleXIble Development approval for (l) attached dwelhngs (13 condommlUm UOltS) With reductIOns to the front setback (north along Somerset Street) from 25 feet to 10 feet (to bUlldtng. and pavement) and from 25 feet to zero feet (to trash stagmg area), reductions to the front setback (south along Cambna Street) from 25 feet to 21 feet (to bUlldmg) and from 25 feet to 19 feet (to balcomes), reductIOns to the front setback (west along Beach Dnve - uOlmproved) from 25 feet to 19 feet (to bUlldmg), from 25 feet to 17 feet (to balcomes) and from 25 feet to zero feet (to pool deck), a reductIOn to the SIde setback (west) from 10 feet to eight feet (to balconies), an mcrease to the bUlldmg height from 30 feet to 61 66 feet (to roof deck) With an addlt10nal four feet (from roof deck) for pen meter parapets and an additional eight feet (flOm roof deck) for decorative rooftop trelltses, an mcrease to the heIght of a decorative fence WIthm the front setback along Somerset Street (north) and Beach Dnve (west - ummproved) from three feet to SIX feet and to permit a butldmg wlthm the required slght VISIbility tnangles, as a Residential Inflll Project, under the prOVISIOns of SectIOn 2-404 F, (2) to permit a reductIOn to the landscape buffer along Somerset Street (north) from 10 feet to zelO feet (to dumpster stagmg area) and along Beach Dnve (west - uOImproved) from 10 feet to zero feet (to pool deck) as a ComprehenSive Landscape Program, under the provISIOns of SectIOn 3-1202 G, and (3) the Transfer of Development Rlghts for two dwellIng UOltS from 674 Bayway Boulevard, under the provIsions of SectlOn 4-1403 MedlUm High Density ReSIdentml (MHDR) Dlstnct, Residential Hlgh (RH) Category Staff Report - Community Development Board - June 15,2004 Case FLD2004-0 1 002rrOR2004-0 1 006 - Page 1 PROPERTY SIZE: o 39 acres PROPERTY USE: Current Use Overnight accommodatIOns Proposed Use Attached dwellmgs (13 UOltS - cOndOmInIUm) ADJACENT ZONING/ LAND USES: North MedIUm High DenSIty ReSidentIal Dlstnct, Attached dwellings (15 condommlUms - under constructIOn) East MedIUm HIgh DensIty ReSIdential Dlstnct, Detached dwelhngs South MedIUm High Density ReSIdentIal Dlstnct, Attached dwellmgs (condommlUms) and detached dwellings West Medium High DenSIty ReSIdential and Open Space/RecreatlOn Dlstncts, Attached dwellings (condommlUms) and beach CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIA TE VICINITY: The surroundmg area IS a mixture of attached dwellmgs (condomInIUm), detached dwellmgs and overnight accommodation uses The beach IS to the west ANAl.. YSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 039 acres IS located approxImately 200 feet west of Mandalay A venue between Somerset Street and Cambna Street The SIte IS basIcally "L" shaped, with approximately 162 feet of frontage on Somerset Street (north), 50 feet of frontage on Cambna Street (south) and 60 feet of frontage on the undeveloped Beach Dnve (west) The site IS currently developed with a one- and two-story, overnight accommodatIOn use of a total of 16 umts All eXisting Improvements are planned to be demoltshed WhIle there IS some eXlstmg on-site parkmg, there IS a large amount of eXisting parkmg that straddles the front property hne along Somerset and Cambna Streets (partl3l1y on-site and partially WIthm the nght-of-way) EXlstmg one-story, reSIdentIal buIidmgs to the east are between zero and three feet of the property hne The surrounding area IS currently developed with older attached dwelltngs (condomInIUms) and detached dwellings The Colony Surf CondominIUms IS adjacent to thIS project, frontmg on Cambna Street (south) and undeveloped Beach Dnve (west) ThiS developer IS currently constructing Similar attached dwelhngs at 14 Somerset Street to the north (15 umts [condommlUmJ, five i1vmg floors above ground-level parkmg, heIght of 56 feet to the roof deck from the FEMA hne) Proposal: The proposal mcludes constructmg 13-uOlts (condomInIums) In a bUIldmg With fIve Ii vmg floors over two levels of parkmg The heIght of the reSIdentIal bUlldmg IS proposed at 61 66 feet from the FEMA hne to the roof deck, which IS a mmImal mcrease over that bemg constructed at 14 Somerset Street ThiS addItIOnal heIght can be attnbuted to the shape of the parcel and the need to provide for reqUIred setbacks and parkmg The eXlstmg adjacent Colony Surf Sldff Report - Commumty Development BOdrd - June 15,2004 Cdse FLD2004-01002rrDR2004-01006 - Page 2 CondominIUm buddmg IS approximately 35 feet In heIght (from FEMA Ime to roof deck) Two blocks to the south on the north Side of G]endale Street and also adjacent to undeveloped Beach Dnve IS a reSldentla] condommlUm buildIng of five liVIng floors over ground level parktng ThiS site IS located wlthm the "Old Flonda Dlstnct" of Beach by DeSign, where "low to mld-nse" buIlding heights ale called for The proposed height of thIS bUlldmg IS consIstent With the bUlldmg heights called for In the "Old Flonda Dlstnct," IS 5 66 feet higher than that approved for 14 Somerset Street and IS less than that approved for the "LaRIsa" project at 650 Bay Esplanade Staff IS USing the "LaRlsa" project as a benchmark for thiS area, where that project's hIghest roof deck was approved at 695 feet above the FEMA ]me (a]though only accountmg for 57 percent of the total roof - other roof decks wele at 585, 48 and 37 5 feet above the FEMA ]me) The proposal Includes a request to Increase the height of pen meter parapets around the edge of the roof deck an additional four feet (from roof deck), where the Code permitted maXImum IS 3D-Inches ThiS Increase IS to make the parapets proportlOna] m respect to the height of the bUlldmg and that of the sImtlar project to the north, and to atd m the screemng of the rooftop aIr condltiOnmg umts AdditIOnally, the proposal Includes a request to Increase the butldIng height another eight feet (from roof deck) for two, open-atr, decorative rooftop tre]hses on the north Side of the bUl]dmg The site today has some eXisting on-Site parking spaces, but there IS a large amount of eXlstmg parking that straddles the front property ]Ine along Somerset and Cambna Streets (partIally on-Site and partIally WIthin the nght-of-way) The proposal IS to eliminate all parking wlthm the nght-of- way and proVide two parking spaces per umt (26 total spaces) on-Site (Code reqUIrement IS 1 5 spaces per unIt or 20 spaces) Parking Will be proVIded on two levels and Will be screened by trellts-type screenmg on both levels of parking A gated dnveway at the western terminUS of Somerset Street Will access the first level of parkmg of 14 spaces The submItted Site plan proposes to extend the eXlstmg street pavement to the west to the eXisting vehIcular bamcades ThiS area IS presently sand To minimiZe the extent of additIOnal roadway pavement and to prevent motonsts from USing thiS addltlona] pavement as on-street parking, the site plan should be amended pnor to the Issuance of any permIts for construction to only pave the length of the dnveway flair Bollards or other barners acceptable to the City should be mstalled at the new end of pavement A gated dnveway on Cambna Street wtll access the second level of parking of 12 spaces SIdewalks will be constructed within the nghts-of-way of both Somerset and Cambna Streets for pedestnan safety, where no SIdewalks presently eXIst To meet Fire and BUIldIng Code requlfements for acceSSible paths from the staIrwell to a pubhc space, two SIdewalks are proposed flOm the bUilding to Cambna Street, one outSide the bUlldlng and one inSIde the bUildIng These Sidewalks can be combined, preferably to the Sidewalk InSIde the bUIldIng, to mlmmlZe the amount of pavement and to Increase the amount of landscape area ThIS change should be made pnor to the approval of any permIts for constructIOn, acceptable to the Fire and BUilding Dep3ltments The proposed buIldmg Will have five hvmg floors, WIth two Units each on floors three and four and three umts each on floors five through seven Umts wIlllange between 2,653 and 2,878 square feet Most umts Will have an east/west onentatlOn, WIth the exceptIon of the umts on the southern end of the bUl]dmg haVing a north/south onentatlon Umts WIll be accessed by elevators from a lobby off of Somerset Street or from a lobby In the center of the bUl]dIng A centra] stairwell prOVides stair access for all umts F]oor three proVides an exerCIse room and a clubroom, both wlth two-story height Slaff Report - Commumt y Development Board - June 15, 2004 Case FL02004-01002rrOR2004-01006 - Pdge 3 The request IS bemg processed as a ResIdentlal Inftll Project to permIt attached dwelhngs wlthm the MHDR Dlstnct due to the height Increase and setback reductIOns bemg requested to the buIldmg, pavement, a dumpster stagmg area and the pool deck The proposal Includes reducttons to the front setback (north along Somerset Street) from 25 feet to 10 feet (to bUIldmg and pavement) and from 25 feet to zero feet (to trash stagmg area) ThIS front setback proposed IS similar to that of the approved project to the north at 14 Somerset Street Front setback reductIOns are also requested along Cambna Street to the south from 25 feet to 21 feet (to bmldmg) and from 25 feet to 19 feet (to balcomes) EXistIng bUIldmgs to the east of the subject property have a front setback of approximately 10 feet from Somerset or Cambna Street The proposal mcludes reductIOns to the front setback along Beach Dnve to the west (ummproved) from 25 feet to 19 feet (to bUIlding), from 25 feet to 17 feet (to balcomes) and from 25 feet to zero feet (to pool deck) EXistIng multi-floor cOndOmInIUm bUIldIngs to the south are set back zero feet from thiS ummproved nght-of-way Concurrent with the front setback reductions In thIS proposal IS the reductIOn to the front landscape buffer along Somerset Street and Beach Dnve The dumpster stagmg area IS located Wlthm the buffer on Somerset Street, whereas the pool and pool deck IS wlthm the buffer along Beach Dnve The request mcludes an mcrease to the height of a decorative fence WIthIn the front setback along Somerset Street (north) and Beach Dnve (west - ummproved) from three feet to SIX feet ThIS wIll be vICwed pnmanly around the pool area on the west SIde of the bUIldmg, whereas the balance of the decoratIve fence IS at the bUIldmg hnes screenmg the parkmg WIth the front setback proposed, the buIldmg's structural columns WIll be wlthm the VISibility triangles at the Somerset Street dnveway The parkmg screemng WIll prOVide views through It for vlSlbIllty purposes Fmally, the proposal mcludes a reductiOn to the SIde setback (west) from 10 feet to eight feet (to balcomes) The setback reductIOn to balcomes IS due to the proposed balcomes exceeding the restnctlOns of SectIOn 3-908 0 that such projectIOns not exceed 50 percent of the WIdth of the bUIlding wall to which they are attached The applicant only antICIpates attached slgnage meetIng Code prOVISIOns Should attached sIgnage be desned on both Somerset and Cambna Streets, a ComprehenSive Sign Program wIll be reqUired All reqUIrements of the Flonda FIre Prevention Code WIll need to be met pnor to Issuance of a buIlding permit Pnor to the Issuance of a buddmg permit, Parks and RecreatIOn fees will need to be pmd ThiS proposal mcludes the Transfer of Development Rights of two umts to thIS sIte from 674 Bayway BoulevaId (SIX townhomes constructed where mne umts were permitted) SectIOn 4-1402 of thc Code only permits the transfer where It does not exceed 20 percent of the permitted denSIty for the subject SIte The proposdllS m compliance With the standards of SectIOn 4~1402 and thc cntena of Section 4-1403 The redevelopment of thIS site, With enhanced landscape Improvements, Wlll Improve the appearance of thIS sIte and the sunoundmg area All appltcable Code reqUirements and cntena mcludIng, but not limIted to, General ApphcabIlIty cntena (Section 3-913) and ReSIdential Infl11 Project cntena (SectIOn 2-404 F) have been met Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstdndmg enforcement Issues associated With thIS site Staff Report - Commun lty Development Board - June 15, 2004 Case FLD2004-0 1 002rrDR2004-01 006 - Page 4 COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: (Sections 2-401.1 and 2-404): STANDARD PROPOSED CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT MAXIMUM 13 dwellmg Units (a) X* DENSITY (30 dwelling units per acre) (11 dwelling units maximum) IMPERVIOUS 074 X SURFACE RATIO (ISR) (0.85 maximum) LOT AREA (15,000 039 acres, 16,784 square feet X sq. feet minimum for attached dwelline;s) LOT WIDTH (150 North 161 91 feet X feet . . for South 5027 feet (b) mlDlmum attached dwelline;s) West 60 16 feet (b) FRONT SETBACK North 10 feet (to building and X* (15-25 feet) pavement), zero feet (to trash staging area), South 21 teet (to bUlldmg), 19 feet (to balconies) West 19 feet (to buddmg), 17 feet (to balconies), zero feet (to pool deck) REAR SETBACK N/ A (c) (10-15 feet) SIDE SETBACK East 10 feet (to buIldmg) X* (0-10 feet) West 10 feet (to bUlldmg), eight feet (to balcomes) HEIGHT (30-50 feet 61 66 feet (to roof deck) With an X* maximum for additIonal four feet (from roof deck) attached dwellings- for penmeter parapets and an may be varied addltlOnal eIght feet (from roof deck) through Residential for decorative rooftop trellIses Infill Project) PARKING SPACES 26 spaces (2 spaces per Unit) X (1.5 spaces per unit- attached dwellings; 20 spaces reqUired) (a) Includes the Transfer of Development Rights for two Units (TDR2004-01006) (b) EXlstmg nonconformmg lot width (c) The site has three fronts and all other property hnes must be proVIded with side setbacks * See dIscusslOn under AnalYSIS Staff Report - Commum ty Development Board - June 15, 2004 Case R.D2004-0 1 002rrDR2004-0 1 006 - Page 5 COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA (Section 2-404.F): Consistent Inconsistent 1 The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for X development 15 otherwIse economically Impractical without devlatlOns from the mtensIty and development standards 2 The development of the parcel proposed for development as a X reSIdentlal mflll project will not matenally reduce the faIr market value of abuttmg properties 3 The uses wIthIn the resldentlalInhll project are otherwise permltted In X the district 4 The uses wlthm the reSIdential mfIlI prOject are compatible with X adjacent lands uses 5 The development of the parcel proposed for development as a X resIdenttal IOf1l1 project will upgrade the Immediate vlclmty of the parcel proposed for development 6 The deSign of the proposed resIdentJaI IOfdl project creates a form and X function WhICh enhances the commumty character of the Immediate vlclmty of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole 7 Flexlbllity m regard to lot width, reqUlred setbacks, height and off- X street parkmg are JusttfIed by the benefits to commumty character and the ImmedIate VICInIty of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole ButldlOg height may only exceed 80 feet, however, If the parcel proposed for development fronts on Clearwater Bay or IS only separated from Clearwater Bay by a pubhc open space COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS (Section 3-913): Consistent Inconsl~tcnt 1 X 2 X 3 X 4 X 5 of the X 6 X Statf Report - Commun I ty Development B oard ~ June 15, 2004 Case FLD2004-0 I 002ffDR2004-0 I 006 - P dge 6 COMPLIANCE WITH TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS STANDARDS (SectIOn 4-1403): COfiSl!>tent Inconsl~tent 1 The development of the parcel proposed for development will not X reduce the fair market value of abuttmg property 2 The uses wlthm the project are otherwise penmtted m the City of X Clearwater 3 The uses or mIX of uses withIn the project are compatible with X adjacent land uses 4 The development of the parcel proposed for development will X upgrade the ImmedIate VICInity of the parcel proposed for development 5 The design of the proposed project creates a form and functIOn whIch X enhances the community character of the Immediate VICinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development RevIew Committee reviewed the appllcatlOn and supportmg matenals on March 4,2004, Apnl 1,2004, and May 6,2004 The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the FlexIble Development request for (l) attached dwellmgs (13 condommIUm umts) wIth reductIons to the front setback (north along Somerset Street) from 25 feet to 10 feet (to bUlldmg and pavement) and from 25 feet to zero feet (to trash stagmg area), reductions to the front setback (south along Cambna Street) from 25 feet to 21 feet (to bUlldmg) and from 25 feet to 19 feet (to balconies), reductions to the front setback (west along Beach Dnve - ummproved) from 25 feet to 19 feet (to bUlldmg), from 25 feet to 17 feet (to balcomes) and from 25 feet to zero feet (to pool deck), a reductIOn to the sIde setback (west) from 10 feet to eight feet (to balconies), an mcrease to the bu1ldmg heIght from 30 teet to 61 66 feet (to roof deck) WIth an additIOnal four feet (from roof deck) for pen meter Pdrapets and an additIOnal eight feet (from roof deck) for decoratIve rooftop trellIses, an mcrease to the height of d decorative fence WIthm the front setback along Somerset Stleet (north) and Beach Dnve (west - unimproved) from three feet to SIX feet and to permit a bUlldmg wlthm the reqUIred Sight VISlblhty tnangles, as a ReSidentIal Inf1l1 Project, under the provISIons of SectIOn 2-404 F, (2) to permit a reductIOn to the landscape butter along Somerset Street (north) flOm 10 feet to zero feet (to dumpster stagmg area) and along Beach Dnve (west - ummproved) from 10 feet to zero feet (to pool deck) as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provIsIOns of Section 3-1202 G, and (3) the Transfer of Development RIghts for two dwellmg umts from 674 Bayway Boulevard, under the provIsIOns of SectIOn 4-1403 for the sIte at 15-17 Somerset Street and 16 Cambna Street, With the followmg bases and conditIOns Staff Report - Commumty Development Board - June 15,2004 Case FLD2004-0 1 002rr DR2004-0 1006 - Page 7 Bases for Approval 1 The proposal complies wlth the FlexIble Development cntena as a ResIdential Inflll Project per SectIon 2-404 F 2 The proposal IS 10 compltance wlth other standards 10 the Code including the General ApphcabIh ty Cnten a per SectlOn 3-913 3 The development IS compatible wIth the surroundmg area and WIll enhance other redevelopment efforts CondItIOns of Approval 1 That the fmal deSIgn and color of the bUlldmg be conSIstent wIth the conceptual elevatlOns submitted to, or as modIfied by, the CDB, 2 That the site plan be amended pnor to the Issuance of any permits to only pave the length of the dnveway flaIr III Somerset Street and that bollards or other bamers acceptable to the CIty be mstalled at the new end of pavement, 3 That the accessible sidewalks from the staIrwell to Cambna Street be combmed (preferably to the sidewalk mSIde the bUlldmg) and shown on an amended SIte plan pnor to the Issuance of any permits, acceptable to the FIre and BuJldmg Departments, 4 That a Umty of Title be recorded m the pubhc records pnor to the Issuance of any permlts, 5 That a speCIal warranty deed, specIfymg the number of dwelling umts bemg conveyed or sold from 674 Bayway Boulevard and bemg transferred to thIS SIte, be recorded pnor to the Issuance of any permIts for thIS project The speCial warranty deed shall also contam a covenant restnctmg m perpetuity the use of all platted lots at 674 Bayway Boulevard due to the transfer of development nghts Any mortgage holder of the sendmg SIte (674 Bayway Boulevard) shall consent to the transfer of development nghts pnor to the Issuance of any permits, 6 That any future freestandmg sign be a monument-style sIgn a maxImum four feet In heIght and deSIgned to match the extenor matenals and color of the bUIldmg, 7 That all Fire Department reqUirements be met pnor to the Issuance of any permit, 8 That all applIcable reqUIrements of Chapter 39 of the BUlldmg Code be met related to seawall setbacks, 9 That all proposed utIlItIes (from the nght-of-way to the proposed bUIldIng) be placed underground CondUits for the future undergroundmg of eXIstIng utilitIes Within the abuttmg nght(s)-of-way shall be Installed along the entire SIte's street frontages pnor to the Issuance of a Certlhcate of Occupancy The apphcant's representative shall coordInate the size and number of condUits With all affected utlhty prOViders (electnc, phone, cable, etc ), WIth the exact 10catlOn, SIze and number of condUIts to be approved by thc apphcant"s engmeer and the Clty's Engmeenng Department pnor to the commencement of work, 10 That all Parks and RecreatIon fees be pal d pn or to the 1 ss uance of an y perm I ts, and 11 That a condommIUm plat be recorded pnor to the Issuance of the fust Certificate of Occupancy Prepared by Planmng Department Staff Wayne M Wells, AICP, Planner ill Staff Report - Commumty Development Board - June 15,2004 Case FLD2004-0 1 002ffDR2004-0 1 006 - Page 8 ATTACHMENTS Aenal Photograph of SIte and VICmlty Locatton Map Future Ldnd Use Map Zonmg Atlas Map Appltcatlon S VJ{W111lIlg Deparlmem\C D lJIl'LLXlPelldJ/lg (mei>\Up for Ihe I1nl CD8I5omeri>et 15 Chateau all While Sand, (M HDR)\Somerul ]5 Staff Hepnrl do, Stdff Report - Commumty Development Board - June 15,2004 Cdse FL02004-01002rrOR2004-01006 - Page 9 ."' ^p... . ~ CDB Meetmg Date Case Number Agenda Item ApplIcant Address: Julv 20, 2004 FLD2004-030 18 E7 Radcliffe Development Company, LLC 669 Bay Esplanade ORIGINAL CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: FleXIble Development approval to permIt attached dwellmgs with (1) a reductIOn of the ITI1mmum Jot area from 10,000 square feet to 6,479 square feet, (2) a reductIon of lTI1mmum lot wIdth from 100 feet to 60 feet, (3) a reductIOn of the front setback from 15 feet to SIX feet (to pavement), (4) a reductIOn of the sIde (south) setback from 10 feet to zero feet to wooden walkway; (5) a reductIOn of the sIde (north) setback from 10 feet to eIght feet (to bmJdmg), (6) a reduction of the rear setback from 20 feet to 10 feet (to deck), and (7) a bUIldmg heIght mcrease from 35 feet to 51 83 feet from FEMA to rrudpomt of the roof under the provIsIOns of SectIOn 2- 803 B EXISTING ZONINGI LAND USE: Tounst (T) DIStnct, Resort FacilitIes HIgh (RFH) Category PROPERTY SIZE: o 148 acres, 6,479 square feet PROPERTY USE: Current Use' Apartments (8 umts) Proposed Use MultI-famIly residentIal (4 umts) ADJACENT ZONINGI LAND USES: North Tounst DIstnct (T), Overnight accommodatIOns West Tounst DIstnct (T), Overmght accommodatIOns and attached dwellIngs East Clearwater Harbor and Tounst DIstnct (T), Clearwater Harbor South Tounst DIStnCt (T); Attached dwellmgs CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY: Scemc north-south beach comdor, overnIght lodgmg, multl-fanuly reSIdentIal, and commercIal Staff Report - Conunumty Development Board - July 20, 2004 - Case FLD2004-030 18 - Page 1 ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: This 0 148-acre site IS located on the east side of Bay Esplanade, approximately 300 feet south of Somerset Street OvernIght accommodations and attached dwelhngs dommate the nnmedIate VlcImty to the west, south, and north By Code, the allowable densIty on thIS sIte IS five hotel umts or four dwellmg umts The sIte contams an eXIsting, smgle-story, elght-umt apartment bUlldmg, WIth back out parkmg on Bay Esplanade There IS an eXIstmg deck on the east side of the Site and an eXlstmg walkway from the front of the sIte to the rear along the south property lme The eXlstmg bUlldmg and ItS parkmg area fIt tightly onto the site There IS hrruted landscapmg There IS one eXlstmg dock, located at the east sIde of the sIte, IS proposed to remam by thIS redevelopment request The sIte IS located wlthm the specIal area redevelopment plan, Beach by Deslgn, as part of the "Old Flonda" Dlstnct ThiS area has been designated for multl-farruly town homes and condorrumums of low to mldnse The nnmedl8te vlclmty IS almost entIrely composed of attached dwellmgs and small motels BUIldmg styles generally resemble archItecture from the 1950's and appear to have been progressively expanded Bay Esplanade, III thIS general vIcmIty, IS a local street WIth no Sidewalks where many SItes rely on the pubhc nght-of-way to accommodate perpendIcular, back-out parlang Generally, the streetscape IS III need of redevelopment to Improve parlang, pedestnan access, and Its aesthetic appearance Beach by DeSign recognIzes site constramts of parcels m the neIghborhood and diffIculties of redevelopment Proposal: The proposal IS to completely raze the eXlstmg apartments and construct four attached dwellIngs ("La Rlsa II") The apphcatlOn IS seekmg approval of the use, lot size and WIdth reductIOns, setback reductIOns, plus an mcrease m heIght The proposal shows SIX on-site parkmg spaces at ground level The butldmg IS proposed to be four stones above parkmg and reach to 51 83 feet from a FEMA bmldmg lme to roof nudpomt ThiS SIte IS located wIthm a flood zone (Zone AE) WI th an elevatiOn of 11 feet The butldmg elevatIOns show four stones With a rooftop terrace over parkmg There IS an elevator overrun tower extendmg over the roof terrace The deSIgn of the bUlldmg mcludes arched styhng WIth some of the doorways and wmdows Large wmdows are shoW\on the east elevation, With V VIews of Clearwater Harbor The plans show the bmldmgs to have a beIge color stucco fmlsh With a red-brown color roof Wmdows are proposed to have alummum frarrung WIth a precast stone look tnm The roof IS shown to have a clay tile rrusslOn shape Wrought Iron railIngs WIll be attached to walkways and platforms outSide the bmldmg on five levels The north and west I' elevations show a decorative architectural medallIon on the north and west SIdes of the elevator tower Extenor stairs are shown on the north elevation, from the ground level to the roof r~p-. t/ ~ bY'4.J/ ~:o <tv"" /h4_ l)A. ~.I~ If It ~ If (. V. '111. whfiP v Wmdows and doors proposed on the north and south elevatIons do not meet Bmldmg Code The setbacks as proposed hnut the use of wmdows and doors to 10 percent of the bmldmg far;ade Vehicular and pedestnan safety would be Improved, as there Will no longer be any back out parktng onto Bay Esplanade A wooden walkway IS proposed along the south Side of the property for access to the rear deck and dock Five cabanas and a rest room are shown on the site plan at Staff Report - Commumty Development Board - July 20, 2004 - Case FLD2004-030 18 - Page 2 \ . the rear of the site The deck and dock amemty IS proposed to be shared with residents of a resldenttal development across the street to the west, (La RIsa I) Trash collectIOn IS proposed to be made from a sohd waste dumpster located InsIde the bUlldmg at the front (west SIde) of the SIte The dumpster IS to be rolled out by complex. maIntenance to a stagmg area, WhIle there IS a landscape plan, the proposed setbacks reduce the opportumty for green space A SIx-foot hIgh opaque fence IS proposed along the south SIde of the property PrehmInary stonnwater design has been addressed The deSIgn IS essentIally complete, Beach by DeSIgn does not specifIcally suggest the development as proposed by thiS applIcatIOn Beach by DeSIgn reads In part, " , the scale and mtensIty of the area, WIth relattvely few exceptIOns, IS substantially less than comparable areas to the south," The document contemplates "lImIted new constructIOn where renovation IS not practIcal." What IS proposed IS a substantial mcrease m scale to what eXIsts wIthm the Old Flonda DIStnct The development IS not VIsually mterestIng and the massmg and scale do not comply WIth the mtended character of the "Old Flonda DIstnct" and Beach by DeSIgn The applIcatIOn proposes to maxuruze the allowable denSIty and IS seekmg seven vanatlons from the Code to make thIS project work (reductIOns In lot SIze, WIdth, setbacks, and an mcrease In bUlldmg height) The proposed use IS acceptable, but the overall scale IS not compatible WIth the eXlstmg surroundmg land uses 11";1'1' /1 The proposed reductIOn m lot area WIll result m a bUlldmg, WhIch IS out of scale WIth eXlstmg bUlldmgs m the nnrneruate vlclmty of the parcel proposed for development The proposed mcreased m height does not result m an Improved sIte plan or Improved deSIgn and appearance The proposed reductions m Side setbacks do not result m an Improved site plan, more effiCIent parkmg or Improved deSign and appearance Development of the land, as proposed, WIll not be m harmony WIth the scale, bulk, coverage, denSIty and character of adjacent properties DeSIgn of the proposed development does not mmmuze VISUal adverse Impacts on adjacent propertIes CODE ENFORCEMENT ANALYSIS: There are no outstandmg enforcement Issues assOCIated WIth thIS SIte Staff Report - Community Development Board - July 20, 2004 - Case Fl.D2004-030 18 - Page 3 \ ' STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: (Section 2-301.1 and 2-304): STANDARD PROPOSED CONSISTENT ~NCONSISTENT MAXIMUM Four dwellmg umts X DENSITY (maximum of four dwelling units permitted) IMPERVIOUS 075 X " SURFACE RA TIO (ISR) (maximum ISR is .95) LOT AREA (10,000 o 148 acres, 6,479 square feet X* square feet is minimum reQuirement) LOT WIDTH (100 60 feet at nearest pomt x* feet minimum reQuired) FRONT SETBACK SIX feet at closest pomt (to pavement) X* (35 feet minimum required) REAR SETBACK {20 10 feet (to deck) X* feet ' , IDlDlmUm requirement) SIDE SETBACK (10 North eIght feet X* feet . . South zero feet to walkway IDlnlmUm requirement) HEIGHT (35 - 100 51 83 feet X* feet allowable FLD ranee) PARKING SPACES SIX spaces, 1 5 spaces per umt X (1.5 per unit reQuired) * See analysIs above for dIScussIon Staff Report - Community Development Board - July 20, 2004 - Case FLD2004,03018 - Page 4 \ , :1 FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA (Section 2-803.B) applicable to lot area and width, building h . ht d tb k ( elgl an se ac s: Consistent Inconsistent /fJ The reductIOn m lot area wIll not result m a bUIldmg, which IS out of J scale wIth eXIstmg bUIldmgs m the Imm~ VIcmIty of the parcel [X] proposed for development OA A. Jr., 2, The use of the parcel proposed for development will not mvolve dIrect [X] access to an artenal street ...-.. ?) The mcreased heIght results m an Improved SIte plan or Improved [ ] [X] design and appearance 04 it J ufi' . 4, The Increased heIght IS necessary to allow the Improvement of off- [X] [ ] street parkmg on the ground floor of the reSidential bUIldIng 5 The reductIOn m sIde setback does not prevent access to the rear of [ ] [X] any bUlldmg by emergency vehicles /'\ - Y The reduction m sIde setback results m an Improved slte,plan, more [ ] - [X] - ~_ efficIent parkmg or Improved desIgn and appearance ------- '--.. "- --.... GENERAL STANDARDS (Section 3-913): /"- Consistent Inconsistent tj/ Development of the land wIll be m harmony with the scale, bulk, [ ] [X] coverage, denSIty and character of adjacent propertIes 2 Development wIll not hmder or dIscourage development and use of [X] [ ] adjacent land and bUlldmgs or SIgnIfIcantly ImpaIr the value thereof 3 Development WIll not adversely affect the health or safety of persons [X] [ ] resldmg or workmg III the neighborhood 4 Development IS deSIgned to rrumrruze traffIc congestIOn [X] [ ] .......... VS) Development IS conSistent WIth the commumty character of the [ ] [X] (7 Immediate vIcImty ~ DeSign of the proposed development rrumrruzes adverse effects, [ ] [X] mcludIng vIsual, acoustIc and olfactory and hours of operatIOn Impacts on adJacent properties Staff Report - Community Development Board - July 20, 2004 - Case FLD2004-03018 - Page 5 , , , . I' SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development RevIew Comnuttee revIewed the applicatIOn and supportmg matenals at Its meetmgs on May 6,2004 and June 10,2004 The Planmng Department recommends DENIAL of the FlexIble Development application to develop four residential attached dwellmg umts on (1) a 6,479 square foot lot (10,000 square feet IS reqUired), with (2) a rrummum lot wIdth of 60 feet (100 feet IS reqUIred), seekmg (3) a reductIOn III the front setback from 15 feet to SIX feet to pavement, (4) a reductIOn III the side (south) setback from 10 feet to zero feet to wooden deck walkway, (5) a reductIOn of the sIde (north) setback from 10 feet to eight feet (to bUlldmg), (6) a reductIOn of the rear setback from 20 feet to 10 feet to wooden deck, and (7) a bUIldIng heIght Increase from 35 feet to 51 83 feet from FEMA to roof mldpomt under the provIsIOns of Section 2-803 B Bases for Demal 1 The proposal does not comply wIth the Flexible Development cntena per SectIOn 2-803 B 2 The proposal IS not m compliance with other standards m the Code mcludmg the General ApplicabIlity Cntena per SectIOn 3-913 3 The development IS not compatible wIth the surroundmg area and wIll not enhance other redevelopment efforts m the vlcImty of the sIte 10catlOn 4 The proposed development IS mconSIstent WIth what IS proposed wIthIn Beach by Deslgn for property wIthm the Old Flonda DIstnct Prepared by Plannmg Department Staff M/~;N. ~ Michael H Reynolds, AICP, Planner ill A IT ACHMENTS Aenal Photograph of Site and VICInIty LocatIOn Map Future Land Use Map Zomng Atlas Map ApplicatIOn S \Planmng Deparlmeni\C D B\FLEX\Pendmg ca les\Up for rile next CD8\Bay t.lplallade 669 La RllO 11 (TJlBay E~planade 669 Staff Report doc Staff Report - Community Development Board - July 20, 2004 - Case FLD2Q04-030 18 - Page 6 9 .... \ ,P CDB Meetmg Date Case Number Agenda Item Apphcant Address August 17, 2004 FLD2004-030 18 El Radchffe Development Company, LLC 669 Bav Esplanade ORIGINAL CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: FlexIble Development approval to pemut attached dwelhngs WIth (1) a reductIOn of the ITIlnImum lot area from 10,000 square feet to 6,479 square feet, (2) a reductIOn of nunImum lot wIdth from 100 feet to 60 feet, (3) a reductIOn of the front setback from 15 feet to SIX feet (to pavement), (4) a reductIOn of the sIde (south) setback from 10 feet to zero feet to wooden walkway, (5) a reductIOn of the sIde (north) setback from 10 feet to eIght feet (to bUlldmg), (6) a reductIOn of the rear setback from 20 feet to 10 feet (to deck), and (7) a bUlldmg heIght mcrease from 35 feet to 51 83 feet from FEMA to mldpomt of the roof under the provIsIons of SectIon 2- 803 B EXISTING ZONING! LAND USE: Tounst (T) Dlstnct, Resort FaCIlItIes HIgh (RFH) Category PROPERTY SIZE: o 148 acres, 6,479 square feet PROPERTY USE: Current Use Apartments (8 UnIts) Proposed Use MuItI-falTIlly resIdentIal (4 UnIts) ADJACENT ZONING! LAND USES: North West Tounst Dlstnct (T), OvernIght accommodatIOns Tounst Dlstnct (T), OvernIght accommodatIons and attached dwellIngs Clearwater Harbor and Tounst Dlstnct (T), Clearwater Harbor Tounst Dlstnct (T), Attached dwelhngs East South CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY: Scemc north-south beach comdor, overnIght lodgmg, multI-famIly resIdential, and commercIal Staff Report - Community Development Board - August 17. 2004 - Case FLD2004-030 18 - Page I ~- - - r/ j UPDATE: This case was contmued from the July 20, 2004 Commumty Development Board meetmg after a lengthy dIscussIOn A motIOn to approve the case failed by a vote of 2-3 and the case was automatIcally contmued The staff report and submittal remam unchanged ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: ThIs 0 148-acre sIte IS located on the east Side of Bay Esplanade, approxImately 300 feet south of Somerset Street Overmght accommodatiOns and attached dwellmgs dam mate the ImmedIate vIcImty to the west, south, and north By Code, the allowable density on this site IS five hotel umts or four dwellmg umts The sIte contams an eXlstmg, smgle-story, eIght-umt apartment bmldmg, WIth back out parkmg on Bay Esplanade. There IS an eXIstmg deck on the east Side of the sIte and an eXIst10g walkway from the front of the site to the rear along the south property hne The eXlstmg bmld10g and Its parkmg area fIt tIghtly onto the site There IS hmlted landscap10g There IS one eXlstmg dock, located at the east SIde of the SIte, IS proposed to remam by thiS redevelopment request The SIte IS located WIthIn the special area redevelopment plan, Beach by Deslgn, as part of the "Old Flonda" DIstnct ThIS area has been designated for multi-famIly townhomes and condom1Omms of low to mIdnse The ImmedIate vIcImty IS almost entirely composed of attached dwellmgs and small motels BUlldmg styles generally resemble architecture from the 1950's and appear to have been progressively expanded Bay Esplanade, 10 thiS general VICInIty, IS a local street wIth no SIdewalks where many sItes rely on the public nght-of-way to accommodate perpendicular, back-out park10g Generally, the streetscape IS In need of redevelopment to Improve parlang, pedestnan access, and ItS aesthetiC appearance Beach by Deslgn recognIzes site constramts of parcels 10 the neighborhood and diffIcultIes of redevelopment Proposal: The proposal IS to completely raze the eXIstmg apartments and construct four attached dwellIngs ("La RIsa 11") The appltcatIOn IS seekmg approval of the use, lot SIze and WIdth reductIOns, setback reductIOns, plus an mcrease 10 height The proposal shows SIX on-sIte parlang spaces at ground level The bUIldmg IS proposed to be four stones above parlang and reach to 51 83 feet from a FEMA bmldmg hne to roof mIdpomt ThiS SIte IS located wlthm a flood zone (Zone AE) WIth an elevatIOn of 11 feet The bUlldmg elevatIons show four stones wIth a rooftop terrace over parkmg There IS an elevator overrun tower extendmg over the roof terrace The deSign of the bUlldmg mcludes arched stylmg wIth some of the doorways and wmdows Large WIndows are show on the east elevatIOn, with views of Clearwater Harbor The plans show the bUlld10gs to have a beIge color stucco fmish WIth a red-brown color roof W1Odows are proposed to have alummum frammg wIth a precast stone look tnm The roof IS shown to have a clay tile lTIlSSIOn shape Wrought Iron railings WIll be attached to walkways and platforms outSide the bmldIng on five levels The north and west elevatIOns show a decoratIve architectural medallIon on the north and west SIdes of the elevator tower Extenor staIrs are shown on the north elevatIOn, from the ground level to the roof Wmdows and doors proposed on the north and south elevatIOns do not meet BUlldmg Code The setbacks as proposed hmlt the use of windows and doors to 10 percent of the bUIldIng fa<;ade Staff Report - Commumty Development Board - August 17, 2004 - Case FLD2004-030 18 - Page 2 h VehIcular and pedestnan safety would be Improved, as there wIll no longer be any back out parkmg onto Bay Esplanade A wooden walkway IS proposed along the south sIde of the property for access to the rear deck and dock FIve cabanas and a rest room are shown on the SIte plan at the rear of the SIte The deck and dock amemty IS proposed to be shared wIth resIdents of a resIdentIal development across the street to the west, (La RIsa n Trash collectIon IS proposed to be made from a solId waste dumpster located mSIde the buIldmg at the front (west sIde) of the SIte The dumpster IS to be rolled out by complex mamtenance to a stagmg area WhIle there IS a landscape plan, the proposed setbacks reduce the opportumty for green space A six-foot high opaque fence IS proposed along the south sIde of the property PrelImmary stonnwater desIgn has been addressed The desIgn IS essentIally complete, Beach by DesIgn does not specIfIcally suggest the development as proposed by thIS apphcatlOn. Beach by DesIgn reads In part," the scale and mtensIty of the area, with relatIvely few exceptIons, IS substantIally less than comparable areas to the south" The document contemplates "lImited new constructIOn where renovatIOn IS not practIcal" What IS proposed IS a substant131 Increase In scale to what eXists wIthIn the Old Flonda DIstnct The development is not visually mterestIng and the massing and scale do not comply with the mtended character of the "Old Flonda Distnct" and Beach by Design The applIcatIOn proposes to maXimIze the allowable density and IS seekmg seven vanatlOns from the Code to make thIS project work (reductIons m lot Size, wIdth, setbacks, and an Illcrease III bUlldmg height) The proposed use IS acceptable, but the overall scale IS not compatIble wIth the eXlstmg sutToundmg land uses The proposed reductIOn In lot area will result III a bUIldmg, which IS out of scale with eXlstmg bUIldmgs III the Immediate VICInIty of the parcel proposed for development The proposed Increased m heIght does not result In an Improved site plan or Improved desIgn and appearance The proposed reductIOns m sIde setbacks do not result In an Improved Site plan, more efficient parkmg or Improved desIgn and appearance Development of the land, as proposed, will not be In harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, densIty and character of adjacent propertIes Design of the proposed development does not mmnll1ze vIsual adverse Impacts on adjacent propertIes CODE ENFORCEMENT ANALYSIS: There are no outstanding enforcement Issues assocIated with thIS SIte Staff Report - Commumty Development Board - August 17, 2004 - Case FLD2004-030 18 ' Page 3 . STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: (Section 2-301.1 and 2-304): STANDARD PROPOSED CONSISTENT ~NCONSISTENT MAXIMUM Four dwellmg umts X DENSITY (maximum of four dwelling units permitted) IMPERVIOUS 075 X SURFACE RATIO (ISR) (maximum ISR is .95) LOT AREA (10,000 o 148 acres, 6,479 square feet X* square feet is minimum requirement) LOT WIDTH (100 60 feet at nearest pomt X* feet minimum required) FRONT SETBACK SIX feet at closest pomt (to pavement) X* (35 feet minimum required) REAR SETBACK (20 10 feet (to deck) X* . feet . . ID1mmum requirement) SIDE SETBACK (10 North eIght feet X* feet . . South zero feet to walkway mmlmum requirement) HEIGHT (35 - 100 51 83 feet X* feet allowable FLD ran2e) PARKING SPACES SIX spaces; 1 5 spaces per umt X (1.5 per unit required) * See analysIs above for discussIOn Staff Repon ' Commumty Development Board - August 17, 2004 - Case FLD2004-030 18 - Page 4 <' \,r FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA (Section 2-803.B) applicable to lot area and width, building h . ht d tb k el2J an se ac s: Consistent Inconsistent l. The reductIon m lot area wIll not result m a bUlldmg, which IS out of scale with eXIstmg bUlldmgs In the Immediate VICInity of the parcel ' [X] proposed for development 2 The use of the parcel proposed for development WIll not mvolve dIrect [X] access to an artenal street 3 The Illcreased heIght results III an Improved Site plan or Improved [ ] [X] desIgn and appearance 4 The mcreased hetght IS necessary to allow the Improvement of off- [X] [ ] street parkmg on the ground floor of the resIdential bUIldmg 5 The reductIon m side setback does not prevent access to the rear of [ ] [X] any bUIldmg by emergency vehIcles 6 The reductIOn In side setback results III an Improved sIte plan, more [ ] [X] efficIent parlang or Improved design and appearance GENERAL STANDARDS (Section 3-913): Consistent I ncoru.lstent 1 Development of the land will be III harmony WIth the scale, bulk, [ ] [X] coverage, density and character of ad1acent propertIes 2 Development will not hmder or discourage development and use of [X] [ ] adjacent land and bUIldmgs or slgmflcantly Impair the value thereof 3 Development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons [X] [ ] resIdmg or worlang m the neIghborhood 4 Development IS deSIgned to mmlmIze traffic congestIon [X] [ ] 5 Development IS consIstent With the commumty character of the [ ] [X] Immediate vIcImty 6 DeSIgn of the proposed development mml1lllZeS adverse effects, [ ] [X] mcludmg vIsual, acoustIc and olfactory and hours of operatIon Impacts on adJacent propertIes Staff Report - Commumty Development Board - August ] 7, 2004 - Case FLD2004-030 18 - Page 5 .." . SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development RevIew CommIttee revIewed the application and supportmg matenals at Its meetmgs on May 6, 2004 and June 10, 2004 The Plannmg Department recommends DENIAL of the fleXIble Development apphcatlOn to develop four reSIdential attached dwellIng umts on (1) a 6,479 square foot lot (10,000 square feet IS requIred), wIth (2) a nummum lot wIdth of 60 feet (100 feet IS reqUIred), seekmg (3) a reductIOn In the front setback from 15 feet to SIX feet to pavement, (4) a reductIOn In the side (south) setback from 10 feet to zero feet to wooden deck walkway, (5) a reductIOn of the sIde (north) setback from 10 feet to eIght feet (to bUIldmg), (6) a reductIOn of the rear setback from 20 feet to 10 feet to wooden deck, and (7) a bUIldmg heIght mcrease from 35 feet to 51 83 feet from FEMA to roof midpoint under the provISIons of Section 2-803 B Bases for Demal 1 The proposal does not comply wIth the FleXIble Development cntena per Section 2-803.B 2 The proposal IS not In complIance wIth other standards In the Code Includmg the General ApplIcabIlIty Cntena per SectIOn 3-913 3 The development IS not compattble wIth the surrounding area and will not enhance other redevelopment efforts m the vlclmty of the SIte locatIOn 4 The proposed development IS InCOnSistent WIth what IS proposed wlthm Beach by DeSign for property withm the Old Flonda Dlstnct Prepared by Planmng Department Staff ht,~,1, ~~ MIchael H Reynolds, AlCP, Planner ill A IT ACHMENTS Aenal Photograph of Site and VICInIty LocatIOn Map Future Land Use Map Zomng Atlas Map ApplicatIOn S \Planmng Departmen^C D B\FLEXlPendmg cases\Up for rile nexc CDlNJay Esplanade 669 La Rlsa l/ (T]IlJay Elplanade 669 Scaff Reportll for August 172004 meff/ng doc Staff Report, Commumty Developmenl Board - August 17, 2004 - Case FLD2004.030 18 . Page 6 t .' ~.t CDB Meetmg Date Case Number: Agenda Item Apphcant Address August 17, 2004 FLD2004-030 18 El RadclIffe Development Company, LLC 669 Bay Esplanade ALTERNATE APPROVAL CONDITIONS The followmg are potential conditions that may be Imposed should the applIcatiOn be approved CondltlOns of Approval 1. That the SIte plan be revIsed to remove the walkway proposed along the south sIde of the SIte, pnor to bUlldmg permIt Issuance, 2 That the fmal deSIgn and color of the bUlldmg be consIstent With the conceptual elevatIOns subnntted to, or as modIfied by, the CDB; 3 That boats moored at the eXlstmg and any future docks be for the exclusIve use by the resIdents and/or guests of the condonnmums; 4 That all slgnage meet Code and be archltecturally-mtegrated mto the desIgn of the SIte and bUlldmg, 5 That there be no Jet skt or other hke watercraft rental busmesses at thIS locatIOn, 6. That the SWFWMD permIt or letter of exceptIon be provided to Planmng staff pnor to any bUlldmg permit Issuance, 7 That a reVIsed landscape plan be submItted to the satIsfactIOn of Planmng staff, pnor to any bUlldmg permit Issuance, 8 That a reVised tree survey be submItted to the satIsfactIOn of Planmng staff, pnor to any bUlldmg permIt Issuance, 9 That the fire service plpehne mstallatlOn be addressed to the satisfactIOn of Engmeenng staff, pnor to bUlldmg permIt Issuance, 10 That Open Space, Recreation Land and RecreatlOn FacIhty Impact fees be satisfied pnor to the Issuance of bUlldmg permIts or fmal plat, whichever occurs first, 11 That all FIfe Department reqUirements be addressed pnor to bUlldmg permIt Issuance, 12 That all proposed utIlIties (from the nghts-of-way to the proposed bulldmgs) be placed underground and mstallatlOn of condUlt(s) along the entire length of the SIte's street frontages be completed pnor to the Issuance of the fIrst certtflcate of occupancy, 13 That TraffiC Impact Fees be detennmed and patd pnor to CertIfIcate of Occupancy Issuance, 14 That the condommlUm plat be recorded With Pmellas County pnor to the fust Certificate of Occupancy, and 15 That the fIre serVIce pIpelme be mstalled by the contractor and the tappmg sleeve/valve and backflow preventor/meter be mstalled by the CIty at the applIcant's expense, pnor to the fust CertIficate of Occupancy S \Plannmg Departmenl\C D B\FLEXlPendmg caselAUp for the next CDlN3ay Esplanude 669 Ln. Rlsa 1/ (TjlBay Esplanade 669 Altemate Summary and RecommendatIOn doc '.. CDB MeetIng Date Case Number Agenda Item Applicant Address September 21,2004 FLD2004-030 18 E2 Radchffe Development Company, LLC 669 Bay Esplanade DRAFT f--- '3/-0'1 CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: flexible Development approval to permIt attached dwellIngs with (1) a reductIOn of the mInimum lot area from 10,000 square feet to 6,479 square feet, (2) a reductIOn of mInImum lot width from 100 feet to 60 feet, (3) a reductIOn of the front setback from 15 feet to 569 feet (to pavement), (4) a reductIon of the sIde (south) setback from 10 feet to four feet to extenor stans, (5) a reductIOn of the sIde (north) setback from 10 feet to 672 feet (to bUIldmg); (6) a reductIOn of the rear setback from 20 feet to 10 feet (to wooden deck), and (7) a bUIldmg height mcrease from 35 feet to 51 83 feet from FEMA to mIdpoint of the roof under the provIsIOns of SectIon 2- 803 B EXISTING ZONINGI LAND USE: Tounst (T) DIStnct, Resort Facllltles HIgh (RFH) Category PROPERTY SIZE: o 148 acres, 6,479 square feet PROPERTY USE: Current Use Apartments (8 umts) Proposed Use Multi-famIly residentIal (4 umts) ADJACENT ZONINGI LAND USES: North Tounst DIStnct (T), OvernIght accommodatIons West Tounst Dlstnct (T), Overnight accommodatIOns and attached dwellings East Clearwater Harbor and Tounst DIstnct (T), Clearwater Harbor South Tounst DIstnct (T), Attached dwelhngs CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIA TE VICINITY: Scemc north-south beach comdor, overnIght lodgmg, multI-family reSIdentIal, and commerCIal Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 21, 2004 - Case FLD2004-030 18 - Page 1 ~ UPDATE: ThIS case was contmued from the August 17, 2004 Commumty Development Board meetIng motion to approve the case faded by a vote of 2-3 and the case was automatically contInued The staff report has been updated as the sIte plan was revised by the applicant ReVISions' The reductIOn m the front setback was changed from SIX feet (to pavement) to 569 feet (to pavement) The reductIOn m the side (south) setback was changed from zero feet (to wooden walkway) to four feet (to extenor StatIS) The reductIOn m the SIde (north) setback was changed from eight feet (to bUIldmg) to 6 72 feet (to bUIldmg) The section of the bUIldmg housmg the dumpster now opens to the outside The ISR was reduced from 075 to 0 70 ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: ThIS 0 148-acre site IS located on the east SIde of Bay Esplanade, approximately 300 feet south of Somerset Street OvernIght accommodatIOns and attached dwellIngs dommate the Immediate VICInIty to the west, south, and north By Code, the allowable density on this site IS fIve hotel umts or four dwellIng umts The sIte contatns an eXIstmg, smgle-story, elght-umt apartment bUIldmg, With back out parkmg on Bay Esplanade There IS an eXlstmg deck on the east Side of the sIte and an eXlstmg walkway from the front of the sIte to the rear along the south property hne The eXlstmg bUIldIng and Its parkmg area fit tIghtly onto the site There IS bmIted landscapIng There IS one eXistIng dock, located at the east Side of the site, IS proposed to remam by thIS redevelopment request The site IS located wlthm the speCial area redevelopment plan, Beach by DeSign, as part of the "Old Flonda" Dlstnct ThiS area has been deSignated for multi-family townhomes and condommmms of low to mldnse The ImmedIate VICinIty IS almost entIrely composed of attached dwellmgs and small motels BUIldmg styles generally resemble archItecture from the 1950's and appear to have been progressively expanded Bay Esplanade, In thiS general vlclmty, IS a local street WIth no Sidewalks where many sites rely on the public nght-of-way to accommodate perpendIcular, back-out parkIng Generally, the streetscape IS In need of redevelopment to Improve parkmg, pedestnan access, and ItS aesthetic appearance Beach by DeSign recogmzes site constramts of parcels 10 the neighborhood and dlfficulttes of redevelopment Proposal: The proposal IS to completely raze the eXlst10g apartments and construct four attached dwellmgs ("La Rlsa II") The applicatIOn IS seekmg approval of the use, lot SIze and WIdth reductions, setback reductIOns, plus an mcrease m height The proposal shows SIX on-site parkmg spaces at ground level The bUlldmg IS proposed to be four stones above parkmg and reach to 51 83 feet from a FEMA bUIlding lme to roof nudpomt ThIS site IS located Wlthm a flood zone (Zone AE) With an elevatIon of 11 feet The bUIldmg elevatIOns show four stones With a rooftop terrace over parkmg There IS an elevator overrun tower extendmg over the roof terrace The deSign of the bUIldmg mcludes arched stylmg WIth some of the doorways and wmdows, Large wmdows are show on the east elevatIOn, WIth VIews of Clearwater Harbor The plans show the bUIldmgs to have a beIge color stucco fmlsh with a red-brown color roof Wmdows are proposed to have alununum frammg With a precast stone look tom The roof IS shown to have a clay tIle ITIlSSIOn shape Wrought Iron ratlmgs wIll be Staff Report - Commulllty Development Board - September 21, 2004 - Case FLD2004-Q3018 - Page 2 attached to walkways and platforms outsIde the bUildIng on five levels The north and west elevatIOns show a decoratIve architectural medallion on the north and west SIdes of the elevator tower Extenor stairs are shown on the north elevatIOn, from the ground level to the roof VehIcular and pedestnan safety would be Improved, as there Will no longer be any back out parkmg onto Bay Esplanade Five cabanas and a rest room are shown on the SIte plan at the rear of the site The deck and dock amemty IS proposed to be shared with residents of a residentIal development across the street to the west, (La RIsa n Trash collectIOn IS proposed to be made from a sohd waste dumpster located mSIde the bUIldmg at the front (west SIde) of the SIte The dumpster IS dIrectly accessIble from a door opemng to the site entrance from Bay Esplanade WhIle there IS a landscape plan, the proposed setbacks reduce the opportumty for green space A six-foot high opaque fence IS proposed along the south Side of the property Prehmmary stormwater deSign has been addressed The deSIgn IS essentIally complete Beach by DeSign does not specIfIcally suggest the development as proposed by thIS applIcatIOn Beach by DeSIgn reads In part," the scale and mtensIty of the area, WIth relattvely few exceptIOns, IS substanttally less than comparable areas to the south" The document contemplates "hmIted new constructIon where renovatIOn IS not practical" What IS proposed IS a substantIal mcrease m scale to what eXists wIthm the Old Flonda Dlstnct The development IS not Visually mterestmg and the massmg and scale do not comply With the mtended character of the "Old Flonda DIstnct" and Beach by DeSign The applicatIOn proposes to maximize the allowable densIty and IS seekmg seven vanatlOns from the Code to make thiS project work (reductIOns In lot SIze, Width, setbacks, and an mcrease In bUIldmg height) The proposed use IS acceptable, but the overall scale IS not compattble WIth the eXIstmg surroundmg land uses, The proposed reduction m lot area Will result m a bUlldmg, which IS out of scale With eXlstmg bUIldmgs m the ImmedIate VICInIty of the parcel proposed for development The proposed mcreased In height does not result In an Improved site plan or Improved deSign and appearance, The proposed reductIOns m SIde setbacks do not result m an Improved site plan, more effiCIent parkIng or Improved deSIgn and appearance Development of the land, as proposed, will not be In harmony WIth the scale, bulk, coverage, denSity and character of adjacent properties DeSign of the proposed development does not mmlmlze Visual adverse Impacts on adjacent propertIes CODE ENFORCEMENT ANALYSIS: There are no outstandmg enforcement Issues assOCiated WIth thIS site Staff Report - CommuOIty Development Board - September 21, 2004 - Case FLD2004-030 18 - Page 3 STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: (Section 2-301.1 and 2-304): STANDARD PROPOSED CONSISTENT NCONSISTENT MAXIMUM Four dwelling uOlts X DENSITY (maximum of four dwelling units permitted) Il\iPERVIOUS 07 X SURFACE RATIO (ISR) (maximum ISR is .95) LOT AREA (10,000 o 148 acres, 6,479 square feet X* square feet is minimum requirement) LOT WIDTH (100 60 feet at nearest pomt X* feet minimum required) FRONT SETBACK 569 feet at closest pomt (to X* (35 feet minimum pavement) required) REAR SETBACK (20 10 feet (to deck) X* feet . . IDlnImUm requirement) SIDE SETBACK (10 North 6 72 feet X* feet . . South four feet to extenor stairs minImum requirement) HEIGHT (35 - 100 51 83 feet x* feet allowable FLD ranee) PARKING SPACES SIX spaces, 1 5 spaces per umt X (1.5 per unit required) * See analysIs above for diSCUSSIOn Staff Report - Commumty Development Board - September 21, 2004 - Case FLD2004-030 18 - Page 4 FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA (Section 2-803.B) applicable to lot area and width, building h . ht d tb k elgl an se ac s: Consistent InconsIStent 1 The reduction m lot area will not result III a Q.UIldmg, whIch IS out of scale wIth eXIstmg bUIldmgs m the Immediate vIclmty of the parcel [X] proposed for development 2. The use of the parcel proposed for development wIll not mvolve dlfect [X] access to an artenal street 3 The mcreased height results m an Improved site plan or Improved [ ] [X] deSIgn and appearance 4 The Increased height IS necessary to allow the Improvement of off- [X] [ ] street parkmg on the ground floor of the reSidentIal bmldmg 5 The reductIOn III Side setback does not prevent access to the rear of [ ] [X] any bUIldmg by emergency vehIcles 6 The reductIon III SIde setback results m an Improved sIte plan, more [ ] [X] effICIent parkmg or Improved deSIgn and appearance GENERAL STANDARDS (Section 3-913): Consistent Inconsistent 1 Development of the land Will be m harmony WIth the scale, bulk, [ ] [X] coverage, denSity and character of adjacent properties 2 Development Will not hmder or discourage development and use of [Xl [ ] adjacent land and bUlldmgs or slgmflcantly ImpaIr the value thereof 3 Development Will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons [X] [ ] resIdmg or workmg m the neIghborhood 4 Development IS deSIgned to mmmllze traffiC congestIon [X] [ ] 5 Development IS consistent With the commumty character of the [ ] [X] mllnedmte VICInIty 6 DeSign of the proposed development minImiZeS adverse effects, [ ] [X] mcludmg Visual, acoustIc and olfactory and hours of operatIon Impacts on adjacent properties Staff Report - Commumly Development Board - September 21, 2004 - Case FLD2004-030 18 - Page 5 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development RevIew Comnuttee reviewed the apphcatlOn and supportmg matenals at Its meetmgs on May 6, 2004 and June 10, 2004 The Planmng Department recommends DENIAL of the FlexIble Development apphcatlOn to develop four reSidentIal attached dwellmg Units on (1) a 6,479 square foot lot (10,000 square feet IS requIred), With (2) a Illinlmum lot Width of 60 feet (100 feet IS reqUired), seekmg (3) a reductIOn m the front setback from 15 feet to 5 69 feet to pavement, (4) a reductIon m the Side (south) setback from 10 feet to four feet to extenor statrs, (5) a reductIon of the SIde (north) setback from 10 feet to 672 feet (to bUlldmg), (6) a reductIOn of the rear setback from 20 feet to 10 feet to wooden deck, and (7) a bUIldmg heIght mcrease from 35 feet to 51 83 feet from FEMA to roof mldpomt under the provISIons of SectIon 2-803 B Bases for Denial 1 The proposal does not comply WIth the FleXIble Development cntena per SectIon 2~803 B 2 The proposal IS not m complIance WIth other standards m the Code mcludmg the General ApphcabIllty Cntena per SectIOn 3-913 3 The development IS not compatible WIth the surroundmg area and WIll not enhance other redevelopment efforts m the VICInity of the site location 4 The proposed development IS mconslstent With what IS proposed wIthm Beach by DeSign for property wlthm the Old Flonda Dlstnct Prepared by Plannmg Department Staff Michael H Reynolds, AICP, Planner ill ATI ACHMENTS Aenal Photograph of Site and VICInity LocatIon Map Future Land Use Map Zonmg Atlas Map ApphcatlOn S \Plamung Departmen^C D l1IFLEXlPendmg tases\Up for tile next CDBlBay Esplanade 669 La Rlsa l/ (TNJay Elplanade 669 Staff Report for tile September 21,2004 meetmg doc Staff Report - Comrnumty Development Board - September 21,2004 - Case FLD2004-03018 - Page 6 A 'J ~ l\ Check list for COB Aaenda & Aoolication sent to Citv Clerks Office FL02004-03018 669 Bav Esplanade App!lcabon Form ParcelldenbflcatlOn Numbers Authonzatlon for Aqent. If Applicable Surveyor Leqal Descnpbon COpy of 400 scale Zoninq Atlas with property outlined and 500' radius hand drawn from outside penmter of site ~ 58 A Sherry Watkms INITIALS V/ :',::>/iAJ L/ SJ &U v' ~<:;)UJ '/2r/tU ~ SitU - .J '. ,'\ -'" Clearwater Plant "Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwaler, Florida 33756 Telephone 727,562-4567 Fax 727.562-4865 .. " C.........E # DATE RECEIVED RECEIVED BY (staff Initials) ATLAS PAGE # ZONING DISTRICT LAND USE CLASSIFICATION SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES NORTH SOUTH WEST EAST - ,,~'--:~~.::,..;:-~ -<~: ::---,~"'-' _/'~ -"'- / i\ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SI GNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION l'\ SUBMIT ~OPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION I~\dudlng 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded .-::;ts of ,\,te plans ?\~' ,,' \ )iiL SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ t 10"7 \~ * NOTE ,>riOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION (Rev, sed 1110Sf02) -PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- A APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION' (Code Section 4-202 A) APPLICANT NAME _Raddlffe Development, Company, LLC MAILING ADDRESS _2424 Curlew Rd Clearwater FL 33683 PHONE NUMBER _727-785-4070 FAX NUMBER _72/-784,0096 PROPERTY QWNER(S) _VIrginia Franks (Must Indude ALL owners) AGENT NAME _ Keith Zayac P E ,RLA Robert Flynt MAILING ADDRESS _101 Philippe Parkway Ste 205 Safely Harbor FL 34695 PHONE NUMBER _727-793-9888 FAX NUMBER _727-793-9855 CELL NUMBER E-MAIL ADDRESS _kelthzayac@aol com B PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION (Code Section 4-202 A) STREET ADORESS _669 Say Esplanade LEGAL DESCRIPTION _See attached survey PARCEL NUMBER 05-29-15-54756-077-0080 PARCEL SIZE _0 15 acres (acres square feel) PROPOSED USErS) AND SIZE(S) _ 4 condominium umts (number of dwelling unIts hotel rooms or square footage of nonresldenhal use) DESCRIPTION OF REOUEST(S) _see exhibIt A fOI descnplron of requests (Include all requested code dev18llons, e 9 reducllon In reqUired number of parking space~ speclftc use, elc ) ---~ Page 1 of 6 - FleXible Development Apphcatlon - CIty of Clearwate r . . DOES THI S APPlICA TI ON INVOLVE THI;: r RANSFER OF DEVELOE'~ENT RI GHTS (TOR), A PRt=- v IOUSL Y APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE P\JI.N? YES _ NO J_ (If yes, 3U3ch a copy of the applIcable documents) c PROOF OF OWNERSHIP, (Code SectIOn 4~202 A 5) i SUBMIT A COpy OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY DEED OR AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING TO THE OWNERSHIP OF THE PROPERTY o ~ WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS (Code Section 3-913 A) Provide complete responses to the SIX (6) GENERAL oI,PPLI CABI L1TY CRITERIA - Explalr" how each criteria is achIeved, In detaIl The proposed development of the land will be m harmony wIth the sC<lle. butk coverage derlslty and character of adjacent properties In which It is tocated __See exhIbit B for general applicability cntena responses to qUf'stlon<; 1=6 2 The proposed development will not hmder or d'<;CQurage the appropnate development and use of adjacent land and bUlldmg s or slgmfi(..anlly Impa.r the value thereof 3 The proposed devetopment Will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons resldmg or working In the neighborhood of the proposed use 4 The proposed development IS deSIgned to mm rfllze traffic congestion 5 T'1e proposed develop men! IS conSIstent With It.e communrty character of the Immedlale vlClnrty of the parcel proposed for developmenl 6 The deSign of the proposed development minimIzes adverse effects Including VIsual acoustic and olfaclory and hours 01 operation Impacts on ad J3 cen l pro pertle s '6h Addrass the applicable flexlblllly cntafla for tile speclflc land use as lIsted lrl each ZQr1mg Dlstnct to which Ihe waiver IS requested (use sepal ate f sheets as necessary) - Explain how cntena 1$ acllleved In detail see exhibit C for applicable fleXibIlity cfiterla responses 1,_ __ _ _ , ---~ Page 2 01 6 - f-Iexlble Development Apphcatlon - Oty 01 Clearwater \ E SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS (Code Section 4-202 A) cfJ ~ r() J:!.. SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (mdud,ng legal desc.rrptlOn of property) - One orlgmal and 12 COplCS " TREE SURVEY (Indudrng eXisting trees on sIte and wIthin 25' of the adjacent site by specIes, s<ze (DBH 4" or greater), and 10Cdllon Indudlng dnp lines and Indicating trees to be removed) LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY, tJIJ ~ ~ ~ PARKING DEMAND STUDY rn conJunctJon wIth a request to make deviations to the parking standards (Ie Reduce number of spaces) Prior to the submittal of this application the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Communrty Development Coordmator and Shall be m accordance wIth accepted traffic engrnee.nng ~n5Wl~s The findings or the study will be used ,n determlnrng whether or not deviations to the parkrng standards are approved, t-t?f'''f}!f::r''--' lit... GRADING PLAN, as applicable o PRELIMINARY PLAT, as reqUired (Note BUlldmg permits Will not be Issued unlil eVidence of recording a final plat IS proVIded) o COpy OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable, F ~ SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS (Code Section 4-202 A) SITE PLAN with the follOWing ,nformahon (not to exceed 24" x 36") All dimenSIons, North arrow, Englneenng bar scale (minimum scale one Inch equals 50 feel), and date prepared Location map, Index sheel re(erencmg indiVIdual sheets mCluded m package Footpnnt and size of all EXISTING bUildIngs and structures, Footprrnt and size of all PROPOSED bu,ldmgs and structures, All reqUired setbacks All eXisting and proposed pomts of access, All reqUired sight tnangles, Identlficallon of enVlronmentally unlq ue areas, sudl as watercourses wetlands, tree masses ana specimen Irees mcludmg descrrptlon and locatIOn of undem\ory ground cover vegetation and Wildlife habllats ete location of all public and pnva'e easements. LOCdllon of all street nghts,of,way within and adjacent to the slle. Location of eXlstrng pubhc and private ulllllles, Includmg fire hydrants storm and sanitary sewer lines manholes and 11ft st<ltlons gas and waler lines, All parkmg spaces dnveways loading areas and vehicular use areas Depiction by shadmg Of crosshatd1mg of all reqUired parnmg lot mtenor landscaped areas. LocatIon of all solId waste containers recycling or trash handling areas and outSide mechanlCdI equipment and all reqUired screenmg {per SectIOn 3 201 (0)11) and Index #701} LOCdllon of all landscape matenal, LocatIOn of all onslle and off site storm,water management faCllltLes, location of all outdoor Iighllng fixtures, and lOCdllon of all eXisting and proposed sldewalKs ~ SITE DATA TABLE for eXlstmg requlrf'd and proposed devetopment In wnllenltabular form Land area In square feet and acres Number of EXtSTING dwellmg unlls, Number of PROPOSED dwelling unrts Gross floor area devoted to each use Par1<lng spaces lolal number presented In tabular form WIth the number of reqUired spaces Tota] paved area IncludIng all paved parkmg spaces and dnveways expressed In square feet and percentage Qf the paved vehicular area SIze and speaes of atllandscape matenal OffiCIal records book and page numbers of all eXlstlng utility easement BUilding and structure heights, Impermeable surface ratio (t S R ), and Floor area ratio (F A R ) lor all nonreSidential uses f o REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 Y, X 11) and color rendenng If pOSSIble. FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE proVide the fOIIOWIn11ad~dr~fQrmatlon on sIte plan One-foot contours or spot elevations on Site, V 11 onslte elevatIons If reqUired to evaluate the proposed stormwat r management tor the parcet, All open space areas, location o( all earth or water retaIning walls and earth berms Lot lines and bUIlding line~ (dImenSioned) Streets and dnves (dimensIoned), BUIlding and structural setbacks (dimenSioned) Struclural Qverh angs """,- "'0,00110" l'r"'[1cl po rv" ceti'~er ?rbVI$' cf all 'lees 8 OE'C' or 9'calc I€n",,'(;g SIZEo cdnor" (drip Ir,lE-S' alod ccnd'll(..ll uf ~utlll, ee<, Page 3 Qf 6 - Fle)(,ble Development Application - City 01 Clearwater ." J ~ G STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS (City of Clearwater Design Criteria Manual and 4-202 A 21) ~ STORMWATER PLAN mdudmg the following reqUIrements EXisting lopography extending 50 feet beyond all prop€rly Imes, Proposed gradIng mcludlng finished floor elevations of all struclures All adJacenl slreets and municIpal slorm systems, Proposed stonnwater detentlonlrelenllon area lndudmg lop of bank, toe of slope and oullel control structure Stormwaler calculahons for attenuation and water quality. SIgnature of Florrda registered ProfeSSional Engmeer on all plans and calculations COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITfAL (SWFWMD approval IS required prior fo Issuance of Cily BUlldmg Permit) If applicable o COPY OF STATE AND COUNTY STORMWA TER SYSTEM TIE.IN PERM IT APPLICATIONS If applicable ~ 'tj(J H LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS (SectIon 4-1102 A) LANDSCAPE PLAN All eXisting and proposed structures, Names of abulltng streets, Dramage and retention areas Indudlng swates Side slopes and bottom elevations Delineation and dimenSions of all reqUIred penmeter landscape buffers, Sight VISibility tnangles, DelineatIOn and dimenSions of all parking areas mcludmg landscapmg Islands and curbing Proposed and reqUIred parkIng spaces EXisting trees on-Site and Immediately adjacent to the SIte, by speaes, size and tocalions, lndudmg dnpllne Location size descnp\lon speCIfications and Quan\lhes of all eXisting and proposed landscape matenals including ootamcal and common names TYPIcal planting details for trees palms shruos and ground cover plants Indudlng Instruchons so,1 m,xes, backfilling mulcl1mg and protective measures, Intenor landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and Interior tandscape coverage expressing In both square feet and percentage covered Conditions of a prevIous development approval (e g conditions Imposed by the CommunIty Development Board) Irngabon notes REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 Yo X 11) (color renderrng If PQsslble), o IRRIGATION PLAN (reqUIred for level two and three approval) o COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM appllcallOn as applicable BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS (Section 4-202 A 23) ReqUired In the event lhe apphcahon Includes a development where deSign standards are In Issue (e 9 Tounst and Downlown DFstrrcls) or as pan of a ComprehenSive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Resldenhallnfill Project ~ BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all Sides of all bUildings mcludmg height dImenSions, colors and materials REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four Sides of oUlldlng With colors and matenals 10 scale (8 Y, X 11) (black and white and color rendenng If pOSSible) as reqUired J SIGNAGE (DIVISion 19 SIGNS f Section 3-1806) ~~'\t ~o\4t1~ U~-5i!7PItV1 (.:t::. All EXISTING freestand Ing and attaChed signs ProV1de photographs and dImenSIons (area, heIght etc) indicate whether they wilt be removed or to remain o o All PROPOSED freestandmg and attaChed Signs PrOVide details Including localion, SiZe, height, colors malenals and draWing o ComprehenSIve SIgn Program applicatIOn, as applicable (separale appllcahon and fee reqUIred) o Reduced slgnage proposal /8 'h X 11) (color) If submitting ComprehenSIve SIgn Program application Page 4 016 - FleXIble Development Application - City of Clearwater "'- _.':l K TRAFFIC IMPACT ~ ,y (SectIOn 4-801 C) X Vt;~~ Include as required rf proposed development will degrade tho Bl::Ceptable level of 5ervlGe for any roadway as adopted In !he Comprehensive Plan Top generation shall be based on !he mosl recenl edruon of I.h6 Ins!Jtute of Transpor1alJon Engineer's Top General Manua! Refer 10 Sec:tJon 4-801' C of the Communrty Developmenl Code for exceptions to thl~ re<;jUlrement L SIGNATURE I, the underSigned, acknowledge thaI all represenlatlOns made Pl1 [,hIS a pphC<lhon are true a nd a ccu ra te \0 the Des t of my kr10wledg 0 nnd au!honze City representatlyes 10 VlSrt and pootog raph !he property descnbed 111 thiS apphcalJon ~--C~~ ~~ STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY Of PINELlAS Jwom to and subSCribed be(ole. me lhls ---d.j day of \A~ ,A 0 20Q!.. to me and/or by . who IS personally known has produced F G ~f(' ,;.eAT L. ~ <:. as IdentJlicallOll FY 53 '? I L- ~ l./ I '1 0 'KoS-€..f'.:/ L FI'fY\.-t. Vlfgmlil Allen ~' t 5882 Q= p..&"<" EX~lres November 30, 2007 ~''''''F''''I~I","'''''' ".....~I~1! /f:iL 1I Jh~ j;;:!l1 0Jyvl..~~~ L~~ ~ 3G''P"i i /d ~~~ ,CL Lf -:{v ~ {l/l4/ t!L 1;- {--.J U ^ J, ~ -IfY1.-OL~u~L cZ O~lL~ ~~ I --I~~ U /}v " 1 .i-z Cl!lAIl/f/VJ I L ~~ C00 l.C{k/y,__L (j ( ( & 0.-0 7/}Z* ~~ /IJ)*~ ;O;~~~ MARilYN KUIPERS CO~SSlON I C<Xl59~98 EX~lit€S S8' 23 nos aoNDED rt1t:::>~ ADV~ WY.Jo.Z'f :;;-.,...~ ~ (/, 5 ~ ret:De ~....Iopmenl Appl,calJOn - Crty 01 Cle<llWaler M AFFIDAVIT TO AUTH( E AGENT V\~4\hl.lA PF'A~~ - "" (Names of an property owners) ThaI (I amfwe are) the owner(s) and record htle ho1der{s) 01 the following desmbed property (address or gene",llocatlOn) (dp9 ~AY e.'7V?AUA~ 2 Thai thiS property consl11ules the property for whim a request for a (des.cnbe request) -S~ ~X\-\\"OI--r A fO~~~~\-:rnow or ~LJ.E?7'~ <: ~ ~E.\m Z,A.."(AC--/'Y:e I"'?t.--A ~-r r=~'(w.\ 3 That the undersigned (haslhave) appolnted am! {does/do} appOInt as (his/their) agenl(s) to execute any pel:rt!ons or other documents neceSsary to affect such pe{r!,on 4 TI1allhls affidaVIt has been executed to Induce the Crt)' of Clearwaler Flonda 10 conSider and act on the above desO'ltJ.ed property 5 ThaI srte VISitS to the property are neces.sa ry by C rty represenlahves rn order 10 process thiS appllca~on and the owner aUlhonzes City represenlabves 10 VlSrt and photogra ph the property descrlbed,rI \!lIS apphcallon 6 I Tho' (lIwe, "e """e~.~d ",,_ woo, =mfy .... "e '"'''''"'"9 " true ""d """,d ~ ~ V~P/'l-/<-' rl?l / ~~ Property Ow1 ' property~ner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINElU\S My CommIssIon Expires ~""" ..,,-.,., ...~ 3 '~~: ~ ~ te of Flonda on thiS 3 / Sr Gay of (') S who haVlng been first duly sworn he St~ ' )fd n . ~"p~ efore me the undersIgned an officer duly commISSioned ~OO If personally <q>eared eposes and says that he/she fully und~ !he cor:r\ents of_ l-MRILYN KUIPERS COMMl~ . 000.59.\98 EXHi<ES 5EP 23 200.5 ~D~ ..:7'J~"J<.Gt NOlAN oc . ;>"'9'" 6016 - F.exible [)<;:"elopmenl A,flpllcallon - City of Clearwa\er S \engtn\autocad\atlas\258A dwg, 09/23/2002 09 02 37 AM, dktng ~ ... '" ~"h ,~; Ei;:Sl:~ ~ ;:: ''''I\'f;Jl> : .", ..J.-p.Z .. s,9{~ . ,- l> -< ~ :;.. ~.;;~ n ~ It nn~ -. O~~ ~ Z:O;)l"l ~ ....... 8~n . W ~ --!~; --~-----~-----~ OS/RM<. " _.~' 0 : I~-JLN.~ ~~;~;~~~.;~ ~""~i~~~~t .jar." ci E:'iJ~~i~ ~~i,~~ I,:" \ ~. :;: w ~"'~ ""'11 ii:;:~^'<>"'~ 1i~"'; "i'l'': ",:,..,,': ~O"~~~aJ ~.. ;i~ ~ t IS _ ~ is "'" ~ II.""'::'.. '/1 '""'" nil ~ _J....., ~ la {J1 - l.-J Qi 11' ~~.,. LA D:I r.;Ill ....... 010 /!lI oI,l!lI ~ do II..-l mltil!f O'(l..... (n/~ t~;;' QL l~ ~..... ~ t.,) :po. L..ij ~~B :;~tl r- nA~ r.J-..J.I"V' U l..J .l.!I ...., Z"o:J ~I-S;:;.::-U;F 6Jf:;- -...1.2" ~ i~.... .... 21 ~~ ~I > t-..'I S ~ '-..JL:..IU 1'Ur--;f"l=J 2.(:'IJ.... t""Y.. ~IOE f')- ~ N ~ ~ ~ (i;1!'ti-W ~... ~~ oI,JII t$::::: ~ve E.::J-OO ~ ~ t1t.f'7 <<::: ""'~~ 2IB - '(Ill ~g~~ ~~~ <C> (J) _.. ..0 ~ ~rJO~ :il~ 'On - ....~....<Il ~ ~Il 4(J1 ~ 1_ IDt ~;Nt ~ tI:I ~.... .::: LO ':: ~ ~ ~S' w:.~~ ~~ i ! ~ ~ ~ 0< ~ oil F ~ I... ~o- --0.... ; ::I II) D .... 4CI .0 -.....-..... CIjo , tfj I~I~ ~ ;;'01 I ~ ~t~. ,I E:: _~"'D~~Y:, ~.~~~ J., 5: ~~ ~H; ~" .. . ,,~ ":!r".,]~ T ~ .... ~ ~ ~ ~"""'1 ~ '"'" " ~ - - <:I ~ -::.~ ~~Ili 1\;;\ ~ ~ M NO!\.L v: ;::i r<. bfl - 197 '" "''' j'''';p. c;;;; ~ '" '-":g "'< ~ 0 Ii ~ '" .13 II ~ _ .,.. ~"I - - - r" ~ ",,, :::::" "'"~ ;-" ~ <.f:- _ ....... I:: ~::::41 ~....o .,a. N ..... ..,;g ....::;: !J ""(oiiliil .. "E .~ r::; -~ I f II! E" d""'!!'" " '" 4' lI!P W<JCl~'<E " TIM ^'<!: ~~ """''''TTIA ~'<E"" ~;- "'~; ~~~~ ~ ~ "eo REPtAT.lBLK ::8q J<it1 c:: ~~ : ~ O':\~. ~ l~ li ~:;j -. =.. ~-.. : ~ ~ " ~ I;--ttt IT~A L Ilro ~ } ~ '"" _ ~ ...~ f! ~ t.> L-.o ... VI 1-6~ I~ ~. ~ tJ;[' !;! .. -..Ir:J_;-~ '""~1it..,l~ ~ T .:J' Y4 jj(EI i!jii~ ~ 11-1 ~"'.I; l.>f aJ 63 ~_~J~ .;r\>I~k"~]. ~ ","'~' ;; ",~I-~ ~. -<"" "" c---- =----- In .. ""~ , - r-------- ~ _o:r:;! ~.....!!>!=..- so~l ~ 11\" c..~ ~:~_~~~'D~~ ~ ~u ~g~g - ~ lil ~ ~ - lob r---~,~'; ~!'J ~~ -" p ".;r... L'" Q I ~ ;;; ~ """",,,,.: ;: .. ~~ ,Y .- .Q iI -.,jll>.l "'".r:- Uly r----- ~.,., ofII oQl:;Ij!tEiI ~t.........-- ~ .Qi Ii; I ~ "'" 1'olI~ N "':';1 Ii,J1 I'~ t 't J..~ ~ fW'II ~~:\J \\it ~;1 ~ 2 8 ~~~~~~i~~~,j'~: rr: :~:l~~ m-i: ~ '~"" . 0 ',>~ '<--- "1~1:ll<ll3o; ,J ~l :!'! ~IH t::""- 1El: ~"~~T2 :41,{~ l'\) - - V "':l: ~ :\",wLV b ....;:'4... Io.Jo ~ ..:- .J) ~ ..c. :}julJ 1 JU f2/:CiG0- <!O - ~"'11 ~~ .; 0<: j.. ~ ~;:f ~ .........J ~ Q gg :;; l""""':J ~ '" R~ '< ~ ~~ 19 ro LJ'I2:t i IS ~ ~ .+ ~ ~ BE''''' o ii 1 "'ANO~"A 'If e-";\i' .... !; tv 0> -..J P - ~ g :; ~ ~ 41 '" "" ~ .". " n '" '" "'", .;:n 'On ~ .. M x O~ r..t1~ ," ,c YJ LQ.arrLW-a.lQ/rL Jf~CVfL J--- 1'0 0> -..J [IJ .. ~~;~-:;~ ~~~ ~~~g "'~ ,.,....<'1 :f:"<~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ e: -~~.~ '" ~----~---~-- ' ~:&"'''' - ~ - ..---i!--HD-"'R YJ L<&O/r-UJ.-aiQ/TL ~ J{ ~(Svf1. '-"Vi '" I,N "," 0 ~g Z I ~ Z u;g C) o fTlZ )> >-- --; Nr (jl)> CO{/) Pi y 88<;:;<:: I a:: rl I .. ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ;;; @ ~~;~; ~ [~:: t:l . .. I- I I '" ~... I I Co ,- I .... H~:c~~:H ~ ~.J I rTJ ~ : ~~]oli~ .....;'"'3 C! N N (1 ". '" '" ,.., r- '" r'l :5 ~i ~ ~ =-!~ :;g"i~~ 0 0 :; C', C I :; '? r' Z =t';ll S._~;i "" 3: ~ ;:; z -< ~ -< ,. -< 0 [~ 'mmm z III g " n 0 0 ,." ~ r- '" III '" .- C) '" '" '" 0 < z ~ m 0 z n 0 '" ;:; ~ p :; '" c: ~ 0 E82 ~2. ... ", g ,~ '" '" '" 0' '" ~ ;, ~ '" ~. '" m <" .- '" ~;~~ " -< ,. "J> Z '" - z '" '" '" '" ~ 0 " ~ L ", " . g <; ~~~j~:;:~~oQ" 0IE1 " 0 '" .., " .. .. 01: ~ i ~t!iH~~ z "':l z '" .., g '" - '" ~ x ." '" '" ilK ..: " 0 ,0 n ", ~ , ~::~f~!~~ ,,' "l ::; :: ~ ?'~ ..: ci-'" r "' ~.. ;~!H!!~~ ",:S: '" ~. -......<Il :; '" ~ - tv'" VI g ;; :~~~il:i~ 00 g 0 ~ ~~..~!~ '" ~~ [IJ ..... ~ ~~ f~~ ! "'~:P~I I ~'uA jJ. ....,. ~ ~ .. - " ~ F"g g t ~~ ~ i ~~ -::!lj 3: r :~~ ~ ~ ~~@ t .....,..,.,> ~ ~~~~ I "2~ o~ ~ f1~;;1 ~ !~ ; 1 ~~ ~ '" Ut ,. ....... <) 2 q t~ "''''"~ co" 0",0 ~n~ -<:~p 5~~ '" ;t>- o. -cl ,.. r"l ::o:l r~ , \ " CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS The Commumty Development Board of thc City of Clearwater, Flonda, will hold pubhc heanngs on Tuesday, ~eptcmber 21, 2004, beglllmng at 200 pm III the CIty Councd Chambers, 1Il CIty Hall, 3rd 110or, 112 South O~ceold Avenue, Clearwater, rIonda, to consider the follOWing requests NOTE' All persons Wlshln!! to addres'> an Item need to be pre...ent at the BEGINNING of the meettnl!, Those cases that are not contested by the applicant. staff. nell!hbonnl! property owners, etc "III be placed on .I consent al!cnda and approved bv a sIRl!le vote at the bC!!I1lmlll! of the meetln!:!: I Alltomo,> Markopoulos. T. M, Mel!as and Kolosso'> Inn. IlIc .lrC requeshng .I reconslder.ltlOn of the case dt October 19, 2004 CDB meetmg for the only purpose of attachmg condltlOn~ of approvdl [Proposed Use' Hotel of 350 rooms (\27 78 rooms/acre on total sIte), 75 attached dwelhng~ (27 38 ulllts/acre on totdl site) and a maXlmum of 37,000 <;q ft (0 31 FAR on total site) of amellltles accessory to the hotel, at a height of 150 ft (to roof deck) with an ddd]tlOnal 5 ft for pen meter pardpets (from roof deck) and dn addltlonal 33 ft for elevator, std]r, mechalllcd] rooms/archltectural embellishments (from roof deck)] at 100 Coronado Dr & 201. 215 and 219 South Gulf view Blvd, L1oyd-Whlte-Skmner Sub, Lots 44-55,90-100, 102, part of Lot 56 & 101, and Co]umbla Sub, B]k A, Lot I FLD2004-02013 r?\Vlrl!lma B. Franks ]S requestmg d Flex]ble Development dpproval to develop 4 reSidential attached dwelhng umb on a \\61479 sq ft lot (10,000 sq ft IS requued), With a mlmmum lot Width of 60 ft (100 ft IS reqUired), a reductIOn In the front setback from 15 ft to 5 69 ft to pavement, a reductIOn III the SIde (south) setback from 10 ft to 4 ft: (to exten or StilUS) a reductIOn of the '>Ide (north) <;etback from 10ft to 672ft (to bUilding), a reductIOn of the rear setback from 20 ft to 10ft to wooden deck, and a bUlldmg heIght Illcrea~e from 35 ft to 51 83 ft from FEMA to roof mldpomt under the provISIons of SectIOn 2-803 B (Proposed Use' Attached dwellings) at 669 Bay Esplanade, Mandalay Umt No 5 Rep]at, Blk 77, Lot 8 FLD2004-030 18 3 Bnehtwater Point, LLC IS requesting a F]exlble Development to permit a mulh-use dock, under the proVISIOn!, of Section 3-601 (Proposed Use Construct 2 multi-use docb of 2,478 sq ft for 14 shps) at 205, 209 and 214 BrJ1!:htwater .QL, Bayslde Sub No 2, Lots 27,28 & 29 FLD2004-06046 4 1504 Garden Inc. 1~ requestmg a Flexlb]e Development approval to permit retatl sales Wlthm an eXlstmg two-story commercial bU1]dlOg WIth a reducttoll to ]ot area from 10,000 sq ft to 7,720 sq ft, a reductIOn to lot WIdth (west) from 100 ft to 50 81 ft, reductIOns to the front (north) <;etback from 25 ft to 19 ft (to eXlstmg and proposed bUlldmg) dnd from 25 ft to 14 ft (to proposed pavement), a reductIOn to the front (west) sctback from 25 ft to 15 ft (to proposed pav.:ement), reductIOns to the Side (south) ~ctback from \ 0 ft to 1 ft (to eXI<;tmg and proposed bU1ldmg) and from 10 ft to zero ft (to proposed pavement) and a reductIOn to reqUired parkmg from 5 to 45 spdces per 1,000 sq ft, d!, a Comprehen~lve InfiU Redevelopment Project, under the proVISIOns of Sectlon 2-704 C, and a reductIOn to the land<;cape buffer along the south property hne from 5 ft to zero ft and a reductIon 111 the Width of the reqU1 red foundation ]andscapmg ad] acent to the bud dmg (west ~lde) from 5 ft to 3 75 ft, as part ofa ComprehenSIve Landscape Program, under the provl!,lOns of SectIOn 3-1202 G (Proposed U~e RetaJ! sales and servIces) at 503 Marshall SI: , E A Marshall's Sub, Lot 10 & W 'I, of vac alley on E FLD2004-02010 5 MIF Investments Inc. IS requestmg a FleXIble Development approvdl to permIt a medical office wlthm an eXl~tmg 2- .,tory 3,575 sq ft commercial bU1ldmg WIth a proposed one-story 896 sq ft bUl]dmg additIOn, WIth reductIOns to the front (west) sctback from 25 ft to 4 ft (to pavement) and 23 ft (to bUlldmg), the front (south) setback from 25 ft to 3 ft (to pa vement) and 5 ft (to bUildIng), and a reductIOn of parkmg spaces from 18 reqUired ~paces to 13 parkmg spaces, J.S a ComprehenSIve !nfill Redevelopment Project, under the proVISIOns of Sectlon 2-704 C, and as part of a ComprehenSIve Landscape Program, under the provls]ons of SectIOn 3-1202 G (Proposed Use Med]cal office) at 921 S Mlssoun Ave, Mc Velgh Sub I st Add, Blk D, Lot 8 and .111 of vac alley on E FLD2004-03016 6 Decade Properties Inc IS requestmg a FleXIble Development approval of d Mixed U~c development for 13 multi-family resldent131 umts and 6 hotel umts With d reductIOn of thc front (::.outh) setback from 15 ft to 603 ft (to pdvement), and d blllldmg hc]ght lllcrease from 35 ft to 49 ft from FEMA (plu<; roof J.ppurtcnances), a<; a Comprchens1Vc !ntill RedGvelopment Project, under the prov]Slons of Sect:lOn 2-803 C (Propo...ed Use Multi-famIly res]dcntlal and ovcrmght accommodatIOns) dt 850 Bavway Blvd., Bayslde Sub No 6 Ut1It A, Blk D, Lot 12 and Bayslde Sub No 6 Umt C, Blk D, Lot::. 13 14 & 15 F L 02004-04026 '~\ . 7 DavId L ..'\.: Kathleen A Jaye, I RE are rcqucstll1g a rlcxlblc Development approval to con~truct a 3 bay ~e1f-~crvlce car wash, wllh reductlOn~ to the front (north) ~etback from 25 ft to 8 ft (0 the dumpster enclo~ure, from 25 n \0 24 ft to bUlldll1g, a reductJon tram the front (cast) s<-tback from 25 ft to 20 ft 10 bUlldlllg, a rcductlon tram the SIde (WL~t) setback from J 0 ft to 5 ft to the freestandmg vacuum area and trom lOft to 9 ft to pavemcnt, and a reduGtlOn to the requlrcd parklllg spaces from 7 to 3 spaces, a~ part of a Compre hen SI ve La ndsLape Program, under the pro VI <;lOns 0 f ScGtlOn 3 -1202 G (Proposed U~e' Car wiI,>h) at 1410 Betty Ln, Slcven~on's Heights, Blk A, Lot 27 FLD2004-04032 8 Quality Boats Ine & Clearwater Marine AQuarium. Ine are rGquestmg a FiLxlble Development approval to perm!! 3 J attached resldenlial umt<; with a front (north) setback of 66ft (to pavement) and 26 12 ft (to buddmg), a sIde (east) setback of 22 75 ft (to bUlldmg), a rcar (south) setback of 20 ft (to pool and cabana) and 53 56 ft to bUlldmg, and a ~lde (west) setback of zero ft (to pavcment) and 22 74 ft (to bulldlllg), and a bUlldmg helght of 85 ft from Base Flood ElevatIOn to mldpomt of the roof, as part of a ComprehenSIve Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provl'>lons of SectIOns 2-704 C (Proposed Use' Mu\tl-famlly reSIdential) at 279 Windward Passal!e, Island Estates of Clearwater Umt 5, Blk C, W 50' of Lots I and 4 and all of Lots 5,6, 7 and 8 FLD2004-06042 Interested parties may appear and be heard at the heanngs or file wntten notice of approval or obJcctlon With the Planmng DIrector or City Clerk prior to the heanngs Any person who deCides to appeal any declSlOn made by the Board, WIth respect to any matter con"ldered at such hearings, will need to reque~t and obtam party status by the Board dunng the case dlscmslon, a record of the proceedmg<; and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedmgs IS made, which record mcludes the tesllmony and cVldence upon whIch the appeal IS to be based per Flonda Statute 286 0 105 Commurnty Development Code Section 4-206 states that party status shall be granted by the Board If person requestmg such demonstrates that s/he IS "ubstantmlly affected Party status entitles parties to pCThonally te~tlfy, present eVIdence, argument and Witnesses, cross-cxarrune Witnesses, appeal the deCISIon and <;peak on reeonslderatJon requests An o<tth Will be adlTIlmstered <;weanng all partiCIpants In public heanng cases If you \vl,>h to speak please walt to be recogmzed, then state and spell your name and proVIde your address Persons speakmg bcfore thc CDB shall be limited to three mmutes unless an indiVidual IS rcpresentmg a group m whIch ca<;c the ChaIrperson may authOrize a reasonable amount of hme up to 10 mmutes Five days pnor to the meetmg, staff reports and recommendatIOns on the above requests will be avmlable for reVlew by mterei:>ted partIes between the hours of 8 30 a m and 4 30 pm, wcekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planmng Department, 100 S Myrtle Ave, Clearwater, FL 33756 Please contact Frank Gerlock, Development RevlCw Managcr, at 562-4557 to dlSCUSS any quesllons or concerns about the project and/or to better understand thc proposal and revIew the slte plan ThiS notice was sent by the Officlal Records and LegislatIve Servlce~ Department, Cynthia E Goudeau, CMC, CIty Clerk Lisa Fierce Plannmg Department Cyntlua E Goudcilu, CMC City Clerk City of Clearwater POBox 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 NOTE Applicant or representative must be present at the hCdnng YOU ARE BEING SENT THIS NOTICE IF YOU ARE THE APPLICANT OR OWN PROPERTY WITHIN 200 FT OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN THE OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES DEFT ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REA~ONA8LE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS, MEE11NG SHOULD CALL THE OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES, DEPT WITH THEIR REQUEST AT (727) 562-4090, Ad 09/05/04 tl . Cyndl Tarapam Plannmg Director Cynthia E Goudeau, CMC City Clelk City of Clearwater POBox 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 YOU ARE BEING SENT 1 HIS NOTICE IF YOU ARE THE APPLICANT OR OWN PROPER'! Y W! 1 HIN 200 F J OF TilE SUBJCCT PROPERTY A COpy OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN THE OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SoERVICES DEPARTMENT. ANY PERSON WlTH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEI<:TlNG SHOULD CALL THE OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT WITH THl<;IR REQUEST AT (727) 562-4090, Ad 09/05/04 ./ /' .' CDB Meetmg Date Case Number Agenda Ttem Apnl 17,2001 FL 01-02-08 C4 CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT BACKGROUND INFORMA TION: OWNER: Kelley Investment & Management LOCATION: 667 Bay Esplanade REQUEST: Flex]ble Development approval to permit a detached dwelhng as part of a multI-family development, to reduce the minimum lot width from 100 feet to 56 feet, to reduce the number of reqUlred parkmg from eight spaces to SIX spaces, and to permit a parlang deSign othet than what IS required by Code, as part of a Comprehensive Tnfl11 Development PtoJect PLANS REVIEWED: SIte plan matenals submitted by Paul Kelley SITE INFORMATION: PROPERTY SIZE: 0278 acres, 12,144 square feet DIMENSIONS OF SITE: The property ]S an Irregu]ar lot of approxImately 92 feet by 132 feet PROPERTY USE: Current use Proposed use Attached dwellmgs Attached and detached dwellings PLAN CATEGORIES: RFH, Resort FaclhtJes High ClaSSlf]catlon ZONING DISTRICTS: T, Tounst DIstnct ADJACENT LAND USES: North West East South OvernIght accommodations Attached dwelhngs Clearwater Harbor Clearwater Harbor and overnight accommodattons Page 1 CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY: The Immediate VICInity IS a mIX of land uses Includmg attached dwellmgs and overnight accommodations ANALYSIS: The 0 278-acre site IS located on the east side of Bay Esplanade adjacent to Clearwater Harbor The sltc IS comparable to many nelghbonng sites The eXIstmg sHe containS seven dwellmg Units housed m three butldmgs The bUIldings are m good condItIOn yet bare no particular architectural style or penod The front of the site IS almo~t entllely covered with asphalt and blends mto the parkIng area of the adjOInIng property Four parkmg spaces are located perpendicular m the nght- of-way, the southernmost space blocks access to the site's Intenor Two other spaces are located In the parcel's center The bUlldmgs and site configuratIOn prevent an effiCient parkmg and landscapIng plan layout The Immediate vlclmty IS almost entirely composed of attached dwellIngs and small motels BUildIng styles generally resemble architecture from the 1950's and appear to have been progreSSively expanded Bay Esplanade, In thiS general VICInIty, IS a local street with no Sidewalks and many sites rely on the pubhc nght-of-way to accommodate perpendIcular, back-oul parkIng Generally, the streetscape IS In need of redevelopment to Improve parking, pedestnan access, and ItS aesthetic appearance The neighborhood IS Identtfled In the spccJaI area redevelopment plan, Beach by Deslgn, as the "Old Flonda" DIstnct The Plan Identifies thiS area as a pnmanly resIdentJaI neIghborhood with limited ret31 I uses that serve local needs It recommends the redevelopment of the area with single-family dwellings and townhouses Bead] by Deslgn acknowledges that a lack of parking In thiS area may hInder revitalizatIOn of eXlstmg Improvements, particularly on Bay Esplanade The Plan contmues to suggest that a shared parking strategy should be pursued In order to assist revitalizatIOn efforts The proposal Includes convertmg one bUlldmg mto a smgle-famIly dwellIng The eXisting bUildIng lS a two-story structure that houses three dwelling UnIts The eXIstIng bUlldmg footpnnt will be expanded by 361 square feet The buddmg WIll be completely renovated to create a two- story, Key West-style home with an observatIOn tower atop The extenor Will mclude wood &Idmg pamted 10 hght blue The buIldmg and wmdows WIll be tnmmed In whIte A galvanIzed metal roof IS proposed to fInish the Key West-style Improvements are !tmlted by deSign The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) flood constructIOn reqUirements must be met If the value of the Improvements exceeds 50 percent of the Value of the structure assessed over a five-year span The owner mtends to pursue future redevelopment of the parcel but prefers a phased approach given economiC restraInts The parkmg configuratIOn WIll only be shghtly changed Landscapmg Improvements are proposed m a small area along Bay Esplanade and to the site's mtenor Including giant Imope, hIbiSCUS and a WashmgtoOlan Palm five Queen Palms are proposed to the SIte's rear along the harbor Page 2 The first request IS to permit a detached dwellmg m the Tounst Dlstnct where as It IS not a permitted use m the dlstnct The site meets the mtent of Code to permIt multI-famIly develop~ ment The bUlldmg could be bUIlt to attach to other buIldmgs on site yet IS Impractlcal given aesthetic concems and desIres to allow access to the water by other tenants AddItIOnally, Beach by DesIgn recogmzes site constraInts of parcels In the neIghborhood and dIfficulties of redevelopment Staff IS support! ve of thIS request since It meets the mtent of Code and lessens the Sl te' s I ntensl ty The second request IS to reduce the mlmmum lot wIdth from 100 feet to 52 feet The SIte IS megular In shape (tnangle configuratIOn) The lot wIdth, as measured at the setback, IS 52 feet while the rear of the site, adjacent to the water, measures 10 excess of 114 feet The fmal requests are to reduce the number of reqUired parking spaces from eIght spaces to SIX spaces and to permIt a parkmg layout other than what IS reqUIred by Code Code reqUIres that the site be brought mto full compliance with the pdt king prOVIsIons of Section 3-1401 10 the event the eXisting use IS Improved or remodeled 10 a value of 25 percent of the eXlstmg pnnclpal structure The eXIsting SIte contams SIX park10g spaces and WIll prOVIde the same number wIth thiS proposal The parkmg layout IS requested to allow parkmg to lemam 10 the nght-of-way Staff does not normally support parkmg In the flght-of-way, however, the parkmg currently eXists and wIll not be expanded One parkmg space wIll be removed to promote better circulatIOn CODE ENFORCEMENT ANA LYSIS: The site has no outstandmg code enforcement VIOlatIOns A. COMPLIANCE WITH MAXIMUM DEVELOPl\tIENT POTENTIAL STANDARDS IN THE T, TOURIST DISTRICT WITH A RFH, RESORT FACILITIES HIGH COUNTYWIDE FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION: STANDARD PERMITTED/ EXISTING PROPOSED IN REQUIRED COMPLIANCE? DENSITY 40 OvernIght 7 dwellmg umts 5 dwelltng umts Yes AccommodatIons U m ts per Acre (11 umts) or 30 Dwellmg umts per Acre (8 umts) IMPERVIOUS 095 083 080 Yes SURF ACE RA TIO Page 3 B. FLEXIBILE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS IN THE T, TOURIST DISTRICT: STANDARD PERMITTED/ EXISTING PROPOSED IN REQUIRED COMPLIANCE? , LOT AREA N/A 12,144 square 12,144 square Yes minimum feet feet LOT WIDTH N/A 110 feet along 110 feet along Yes minimum Edgewater Edgewater Dnve, 212 feet Dnve, 212 feet along Sunset along Sunset Pomt Road Pomt Road HEIGHT N/A 20 feet 34 feet Yes maximum FRONT YARD N/A o feet o feet Yes SETBACK minimum SIDE YARD N/A o feet - north o feet - north Yes SETBACK (49 feet to (49 feet to minimum bUJldmg), 0 feet buIldmg), 0 feet - south (5 feet to - south (5 feet bUJldmg) to bUlldmg) REAR YARD N/A 3 feet 3 feet Yes SETBACK minimum PARKING Detenmned by 7 spaces'" 6 spaccs* Yes SPACES the Commumty minimum Development Coordinator based on the \ specifIc use and/or ITE Manual stdndards (1 space per umt or 5 spaces) * Three parkmg spaces are located m the adjacent flghl-ot-way and are not considered legal "paces per Code P dge 4 C. T, TOURIST DISTRICT FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS: 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. The small lot Slze precludes all appropnate uses In the Tounst Dlstnct as part of a flexible Standard apphcant The locatIOn of eXisting bUildings severely restncts optIOns for parking and will most likely result In building demolltlOn The eXlstmg uses are more intenSive than what the site can efficiently accommodate per current Code Approval of thiS proposal w1ll reduce site's intensity The detached dwelhng, which 1S not a permitted use tn the Tounst DIStIlCt, will result from ehmmatlng two dwelling UTIlts from the eX1stmg outdated structure It 1S Impractical to reqUlre the applicant to attach an unneeded wall to the adjOInIng building solely to deem the structure conformmg 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties; The proposal Includes reducing the site mtenSIty from seven UTIlts to five UnIts One of the bUlldmgs will be redeveloped mto a Key West-style house It IS anllclpated that the proposal Will Improve the site as seen flOm the adJOITIlng street and adjacent properties Staff does not anticipate any negative fmanclal consequences onto abuttmg properties 3. The uses Within the ComprehenSive Infill Redevelopment Project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater; Attached and detached dwelhngs are permitted In the CIty of Clearwater 4. The uses or mix of uses Within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are compatible with adjacent land uses; The adjacent uses Include overnight accommodatIOns and attached dwelhngs The uses on thiS sIte wllI remain reSIdential dnd are compatible With the surroundmg nel gh borhood S. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. The site IS umquely located wlthm a reSidentIal area on the bamer Islands With direct access to the harbor The applicant deslfes to contmue to operate an apartment complex wlth dIrect views and access to Clearwater Harbor Given cost constraints, lack of available land on Clearwater Beach, and the app!tcant's desIres, It IS seems reasonable to assume other sites are unavailable Page 5 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will upgrade the immedIate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; The proposal will Improve the aesthetIc appearance of an eXisting bUIlding that follows the recommendatiOns of Beach by De5lgn The proposal will reduce the site's intensity by two dwelling umts Landscaping Improvements are proposed to the rear of the property Given the site Improvements and reductIOn In intensity, It IS reasonable to assume the proposal will upgrade thc Immediate VICinity 7. The design of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project creates a form and functIOn which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole; The Immediate VICinity Includes small motel and apartment developments nestled on Clearwater Harbor Beach by DesIgn IdentifIes the area as the "Old Flonda" Dlstnct whIch mcludes the low intensive resIdential uses The redevelopment Includes Key West- style architecture, a reductIOn III density and Improved landscapmg The proposal IS consistent with eXisting cornmumty character and the Intended character as addressed m Beach by DesIgn 8. Flexibility m regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parkmg are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole; FleXIbility m lot WIdth IS reqUlred to permit any residential redevelopment on thiS parcel Additionally, no reasonable redevelopment IS permitted without requmng parkmg to meet the currently Code A Code-reqUlred parkmg desIgn would require demolitIOn of eXIsting bulldmgs and produce unreasonable cost constramts Approval of a parkmg design other than what IS reqUIred by Code will allow a reductIOn In site mtenslty and permIt redevelopment of an entire bUIlding The redevelopment proposal WIll aesthetically enhance the Immediate vlclmty 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in DiviSIOn 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The proposal does not Include a mix of uses that would deem the site applicable to the shared parking formula of Code The requested parkmg deSign IS requested to accommodate parkmg need Though the parking IS located partially m the nght-of-way, It IS not located on the street Itself P dge 6 D. GENERAL APPLICABILITY: Conditions which are imposed by the Community Development Coordinator and the Community Development Board pursuant to a Level One or a Level Two Approval shall ensure that: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density, and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The adjacent properties are almost entIrely paved or covered by bUIldings The proposal In consistent with other land development patterns m the neIghborhood 2. The proposed development will not hmder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. ThIS sIte and others m the Immediate VICInIty seem far more mtense than the parcels are able to support The proposal mcludes the ehrnmatlOn of two dwelling umts to result 10 a less 10tensIve site Improvements 10clude the redevelopment of an entire bUlldmg to reflect the beach character of the neighborhood ThIS redevelopment proposal may serve as a catalyst for other appropnate Improvements m the Immediate VICInIty 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The plOposal ]S not expected to adversely affect the health or safety or persons resIdIng or workmg m the neIghborhood 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. The use IS not conSidered a large traffIc generator The proposal IS less mtenslve than the eXistIng site and approval of thIs applIcant may actually Improve traffic m the area by reducmg the number of dwellmg umts 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vlclmty of the parcel proposed for development. The Immediate communIty Includes numerous apartments and small motels as part of a waterfront beach neIghborhood Like thiS Site, many of the adjacent sites are faIrly 1Otens]ve In relation to the lot SIzes and bUIlding coverage Most of the surroundmg sites fall to proVide parkmg layouts as reqUIred by Code Page 7 6. The design of the proposed development mmlmlzes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. The proposal reduces the site's mtensHy by two dwellIng umts The proposed Improvements to the buIldmg WIll Improve the site's appearance The mere nature of the site IS not expected to produce adverse acoustic and olfactory and hours of operatlOn Impacts onto adjacent properties SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The apphcatlOn and supportmg matenals were reviewed by the Development Review Committee on March 20,2001 The proposal mc1udes altematlOns that wIiIImprove the site's functIon and lessens Hs mtenslty Given economIC constramts, complete redevelopment IS Impractical to the current owner The development will further the City's goals of Improvmg the character of area and promolmg the pnvate sector redevelopment The proposal IS m comphance with the Flexlblhty Cntena for a Comprehensive Infdl Redevelopment Cntena and the recommendatIOns of Beach by DeMgn The Plannmg Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development applicatIOn to to permit a detached dwelhng as part of a multi-famIly development, to reduce the mmlmum lot width from 100 feet to 56 feet, to reduce the number of required parkmg from eIght spaces to SIX spaces, and to permH a parkmg design other than what IS reqUIred by Code, as part of a Comprehensive InfIll Development Project at 667 Bay Esplanade, With the followmg conditIOns 1 That any future redevelopment InitIatives Include a parkmg design that complIes WIth Code or IS approved by the Commumty Development Board, 2 That It be acknowledged that the parkmg m the nght-of-way IS not guaranteed and may cease Without notice Prepared by W Ryan Givens ATTACHMENTS Aenal Photograph of SHe and Vlcmlty Location Map Future Land Use Map Zonmg Atlas Map ApplIcallon ~ IPlanmng Departmem\C D B\FLEX\Pendmg Apphcatlons\Edgewater 1919 EdgewJler Dn ve Motel\Edgewaler 1919 STAFF REPORT doc Page 8 " /'" CDB Meeting Date Case Number Agenda Item November 19, 2002 FLD2002-09031 B3 CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT ST AFF REPORT BACKGROUND INFORMATION: OWNER: CBGAM, Tnc APPLICANT: Mr Uday Lele, White Sands, LLC LOCATION: 14 Somerset Street REQUEST: FlexIble Development approval to Increase the heIght of a wall Within the front setback along Somerset Street from three feet to SIX feet under the proVISIOns of SectIOn 3-804 AI, reduce the front (south) setback along Somerset Street from 25 feet to 10 feet (to budding), and Increase the heIght of a bUIlding With attached dwellIngs from 30 feet to 56 feet (as measured from base flood elevatIOn), as part of a ReSIdentIal Inflll Project under the proVISIOns of Section 2-404 F PLANS REVIEWED: Site and landscape plans submitted by Cumby and Fair, lnc ArchItectural plans submItted by John Marshall Scott SITE INFORMATION: PROPERTY SIZE: 050 acres, 21,884 square feet DIMENSIONS OF SITE: ApprOXimately 249 feet of width by 87 feet of depth PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Proposed Use: Overnight accommodatIons Attached dwellmgs PLAN CATEGORY: RH, ReSIdentIal High Dlstnct Classlftcatlon ZONING DISTRICT: MHDR, MedIUm HIgh DenSity ReSidentIal Dlstnct Sta ft Report - Community Development Board - November 19, 2002 - Case FLD2002-09031 - Page 1 ADJACENT LAND USES: North West East South Detdched dwellings Gulf of MexIco Attached dwellings Attached dwelhngs CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY: Mult]- and single-family resIdential uses dominate the Immediate VICInity ANALYSIS: The 0 50-acre sHe IS located on the no]1h side of Somerset Street approxImately 150 feet west of Mandalay Avenue The site, Initially developed In 1925, IS located Within transItIonal area on Clearwater Beach markmg the boundary between smgle-famlly dwellmgs to the north and multI- family and overnight accommodatIOn uses to the south The sHe IS located directly along the Gulf of Mex]co An ummproved nght-of-way, Beach Dnve eXIsts along the west sHe of the site The site contains two structures wHh a total of nine holel umts A two-story bUIldmg, approxImately 24 feet m heIght wHh approxlTnately 2,263 square feet of area, IS located centrally on the property and contams seven dwell10g umts A second, one-stOI y budding, approxImately 23 feet 10 height with approximately 1,922 square feet of area, IS located on the east portion of the Site and conta1OS two dwe]ling umts There are parkmg spaces that are partially on the site and partially In the nght- of-way The sHe IS located Wlthm the "Old Flonda Dlstnct" of Beach by DeSIgn WhICh deSignates the area for reSidential reuse With multI-family town homes and condommlUms The Plan recommends low to mldnse development The character of the area ]s of modest attached dwellIngs and overnIght accommodatIOns There]s s]gmf]cant redevelopment potentml m the area The proposal Includes the redevelopment of the site with a 15-umt condomlnlUm buildmg of 62,692 square feet and five stones above parkmg The proposed bUIldmg will be located approximately 10 feet from the side (north and east) property !tnes, 25 feet from the front (east) property hne along Beach Dnve (ummproved) and 10 feet from the front (south) property lme along Somerset Street The apphcam seeks lo mcrease the heIght of a wall wlthm the front setback from three feet to SIX feet, reduce the front (south) setback along Somerset Street from 25 feet to 10 feet (to bUIldmg) and mcrease the heIght from 30 feet to 56 feet (as measured from base flood eleVatIOn), as pal1 of a ReSidential lofill Project Attached dwellings under the FleXIble Standard Development provlslOns are pe1l11llted to be up to 50 feet 10 heIght and may have front setbacks reduced to 15 feet Th]s site ]S located wlthm a flood zone (zone VE), and the requested height ]s 56 feet (as measured from the base flood elevat]on of ]4 feet) wHh five floors above one floor of parlang By Code, helght IS measure from base flood elevatIOn The front (south) setback request of 10 feet and a height greater than 50 feet reqUires that the applicatIOn be reviewed as part of a ReSidential lnfill Project request Staff Reporl- Commumty Development Board - November 19,2002 - Case FLD2002-09031 - Page 2 One level of under-structure parking wIll be provided and wIll Include 28 spaces that exceed Code reqUirements of 23 spaces Access to the site IS proposed along Somerset Street at two gated en trancel eXI ts The MedIterranean architecture of the bUIldmg wIll Include neutral-color stucco, terracotta color barrel tIle roof, and a slgmflcant number of Windows and balcomes on all elevatIOns The flat roof has been deSigned to mlmmlze views at the mechamcal equipment and mcorporates the use of cupola-type enclosures The buildmg compl1ments the VISIOn of the "Old Flonda Dlstnct" It WIll serve as an dppropnate transitIOn use from the more Intensely developed area to the south, consIstmg of a vanety of overmght accommodatIOn, retml, restaurant and other non-reSidential uses, to the Single-famIly neighborhood to the north A white, alummum picket-style fence, 42-tnches m height will be located around the pen meter of the pool whlch IS to be located along the Gulf side of the bUIldmg A masonry wall will taper from SIX feet m heIght to four feet, extending from the south fa~ade of the bUilding on either sIde of the mam entrance It will contmue to the east and west along Somerset Street for approXimately 12 feet The wall WI]] have a stucco fln1sh paInted to match the pnmary color of the buildmg It]s deSigned to screen the trash stagmg area and prOVide space for bUIldmg Identlf]catlOn An awning will cover the main entryway The landscapc plan exceeds the reqUirements of Code ThIS mcludes a mIxture of vanous trees, shrubs, palms and annuals A sidewalk, four-feet 10 width wlll be provIded along Somerset Street The sidewalk will mclude a distressed fITIlsh The sIdewalk will connect with an eXIstmg sidewalk to the east It will provide for continued public access across the frontage of the site to the Gulf Amemtles mclude an m-ground sWImmmg pool along the gulf (west sIde) Roof drams will be routed through a proposed stonnwater vault which wIll Include a fIltratIOn system A Code- compliant method of treatmg paved, vehicular use areas must be proVIded to satisfy stonnwater management cntena, pnor to the Issuance of any permits, and the applIcant ]S noticed that this could adversely Impact the site deSign As prOVided In SectIOn 4-406 of the Code, should addressmg stormwater Issues result 10 a sIte plan which ]S sIgmf]cantly different from the one approved by the Commumty Development Board, the SIte plan must be resubmitted to the Board for review Fire Department requirements, mcludmg gates with an approved emergency entry system dnd a knox key box on the bUIldmg for emergency egress, have been noted on the plan Solid Waste Departmcnt reqUirements have been met Trash Will be collected Wlthm the bUlldmg and moved to a stagmg drea by the complex staff on pIck up days CODE ENFORCEMENT ANALYSIS There are no outstanding enforcement Issues aSSOCIated With thIS site S td ff Report - Commum! y Development Board - November 19, 2002 - Case FLD2002-09031 - Page 3 A. COMPLIANCE WITH MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL STANDARD IN THE MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (Section 2.401.1): STANDARD REQUIREDI EXISTING PROPOSED IN PERMITTED COMPLIANCE? DENSITY 15 dwellmg Units Nine dwelling 15 dwelling Yes (dwelling units (30 duJac) Units Units (30 per acre) dwelling Units per acre) IMPERVIOUS 085 054 071 Yes SURF ACE RATIO B. FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECTS IN THE MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (SectIOn 2-404): STANDARD PERMITTEDI EXISTING PROPOSED IN REQUIRED COMPLIANCE? LOT AREA N/A 21,884 square 21,884 square Yes (minimum) feet feet LOT WIDTH N/A 249 feet 249 feet Yes (minimum) FRONT 10 - 25 feet South 10 feet South 10 feet (to Yes SETBACK (to buildmg bUlldmg West 36 feet (to West 25 feet (to bUlld1Og) bUIldmg) REAR o - 15 feet N/A* N/A* Yes SETBACK SIDE o - 10 feet North zero feet North 10 feet (to Yes SETBACK (to buIldmg) bUlldmg) East three feet East 10 feet (to (to buIldmg) bUIldmg) HEIGHT 30 feet** 24 feet** 56 feet** Yes** maximum PARKING 1 5 spaces per 12 spaces 28 spaces (1 86 Yes*** SPACES Unit (23 spaces spdces per minimum based on 15 Unlt)** * UnIts) * Corner lots, under the provIsIOns of SectIOn 3-903 D , have sIde and front setbacks only The development standards for reSIdentIal Inflll projects are gUldehnes and may be vaned based on the cntena specIfIed 10 SectIOn 2-404 F The m10lfnum development standards for attached dwellmgs are 1 5 Pdrkmg spaces per unit (23 spaces) The appltcant has proVided 28 spaces, exceedmg the mmlmum reqUirements of Code ** *** Staff Report - Commumty Development Board - November 19,2002 - Case FLD2002-09031 - Page 4 C. FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECT IN THE MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (Section 2-404.F): 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity and development standards; The subject property was developed dunng the mId-1920's and redeveloped dunng the Tmd- 1950's The area IS mtensely developed with predommantly multl-famtly and ovenllght accommodation uses to the south and east The area to the north has been developed wHh smgle-famlly dwellings A vanety of non~reSIdentIal uses mcludmg restaurants, offices and retail sales and service eXist to the south The proposal mcludes the demolItion of the two eXlstmg, structures and constructmg a smgle, reSIdential bUlldmg The reductIOns m setbacks wIll provIde a buildmg similar IS SIze and scale to other bUlldmgs along Somerset Street The mcrease m heIght IS necessary to provIde a VIable product and allows for the placement of parkmg underneath the bUlldmg AdditIOnal upscdle resIdential dwellings are dn Important component of a healthy mix of uses m thIS area and encouraged by the "Old F10nda Dlstnct" and Beach by De~lgn ThiS use will also stabilize and support other service uses nearby 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties; The ultimate redevelopment of thIS sHe WIll likely enhance abuttmg properties The buIldmgs are approximately 50 years old The current assessed valuatIOn of the site IS $2 4 mlihon The anticIpated value of the Site IS expected to be m excess of $14,800,000 3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the district; The site IS zoned MedIUm High DensIty ResIdential Dlstnct and the proposed use WIll be m compliance with the zonmg Surroundmg properties mclude reSidential and overnight accommodatIons The proposed development Will result m a development m keepmg WIth the mtended character of the "Old F\onda DIstnct" wlthm Beach by De~lgn 4. The uses within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent lands uses; Adjacent land uses are predommantly attached reSIdential and overnight accommodatlOn Many of the structures m the drea are low- to mld-nse attached dwellings With under bUlldmg parkmg The bUlldmg complements the VISIOn of the "Old Flonda Dlstnct" and WIll serve as an appropnate transHlOn use from the more mtenseIy developed area to the south and the smgle-famIly neIghborhood to the north The proposalmcludes a change of use from nonresidentIal to resIdential WhICh IS more compatible With adjacent land uses Staff Report - Community Development Board - November 19,2002 - Case FLD2002-09031 - Page 5 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; The proposed bulldmg will be attractively designed wIth parkmg IS excess of Code reqUirements and abundant landscapmg The development and desIgn of the project will set a new stdndard for the area It may be a catdlytlc prOject that mfluences other like redevelopment efforts 6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicimty of the parcel pro- posed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole; The proposal Includes the complete redevelopment of a modest property WIth a 15-umt condominIUm bUlldmg It IS consIstent With the provIsIOns of Beach by Deslgn and the Medium H]gh DenSIty Residential D]stnct The proposal Incorporates well-articulated, umfled elevatIOns and coordinated archItectural elements Landscaping wIll be provided along all property lines The proposed development wIll enhance the commumty character of the ImmedIate VICIn]ty of the parcel proposed for development the City of Clearwater as a whole AddItIOnal residential development ]S a key component to the success of the "Old Flonda D]stnct" 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parkmg are Justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vlclmty of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. The proposed development wIll aesthetically Improve the ImmedIate area and Clearwater as a whole The proposed project retlects the City's V]SlOn of a resIdentIal character Within the "Old Florida Dlstnct" wlthm Beach by Deslgn The reductIOns 10 setbacks WIll prOVIde a building SImIlar IS size and scale to other bUlldmgs along Somerset Street The proposal will be pedestnan In scale and wlil provIde for a contmuous streetscape along Somerset Street Staff Report - Commumty Development Board - November 19,2002 - Case FLD2002-09031 - Page 6 D. GENERAL APPLICABILITY (Section 2-903.C): Conditions which are imposed by the Community Development Coordinator and the Community Development Board pursuant to a Level One or a Level Two Approval shall ensure that: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density, and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The proposed development will serve as a transHlOn between the more Intensely developed area to the south and the residential neIghborhood to the north The goal of the "Old Flonda Dlstnct" or Beach by DesIgn Includes a revitalized, multl-famtly resIdential area to support beach busmesses Such development 1S encouraged to take the form of townhomes and condominIUms This proposal Includes upscale condominIUms wlth amemtles which complies With Beach by De~lgn It will hopefully establish a pOSItive redevelopment precedent for the area AdditIonal upscdle resldenttal dwellmgs are an 1mportant component of a healthy mlX of uses 10 th1S area ThIS use wIll also stabilize and support other service uses nearby 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The sHe IS zoned MedIUm High DenSity Dlstnct and IS part of the "Old Flonda Dlstnct" Within Beach by DeSign The proposed development wlll be m comphance With that zomng clasSlflcatlOn and the gUldelInes outlined 10 Beach by DeSIgn With a new, attract1vely deSIgned reSidential butldmg and landscapmg The proposed development will help generate a better mIx of resldentml uses and encourage the hke redevelopment of other sltes 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The proposed resldentml use IS permitted In the zomng dlstnct, and should not create any adverse health or safety Impacts In the neighborhood The plOposal Includes under bUlldmg parking and landscaping In excess of Code requllements m addltton to other on- :ilte Jmemtles 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. The proposed development Will have two mgress/egress pOints of access along Somerset Street which lS a dead-end street The proposal Includes raZing the two eXlstmg bUIldings wlth mne overnight accommodatIOn umts and replaCing them With one bUlldIng With 15 resldenttal umts Vehicle tnp generation should have no reductIon In levels of service on any roads In the area Staff Report - Commumty Development Board - November 19,2002 - Case FLD2002-09031 - Page 7 S. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicInity of the parcel proposed for development. Adjacent land uses are pnmanly multI-family dwellmgs With overnight accommodatIOns farther to the east and south Smgle-family dwelhngs eXist to the north and a mix of rcstaurants clnd retml sales and service and other non-resldentllll uses eXist farther to the south The site IS wlthm the "Old FlorIda Dlstnct" of Beach By DeSign which encourages multI-family dwellings The proposal WIll meet the mtent of Beach by De~/gn With a new attractively deSigned reSIdentIal bUlldmg The proposed buIldmg WIll be located Similarly to surroundmg bUlldmgs provldmg a contmuous streetscape along Somerset Street The deSign of the bUlldmg Will create a pOSItIve vIsual nnpact along the street with abundant balcomes, wmdows and buffered, under-buIldmg parkmg 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. The proposed devclopment WIll have two mgress/egress pomts of access along Somerset Street Solid waste WIll be collected mSlde the bUlldmg and moved to a stagmg area along Somerset Street for pick up The benefit of this project mcludes the redevelopment of a modest site WIth an attractIve reSidential bUlldmg and well-deSigned landscapmg SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development ReView CommIttee revIewed the applicatIOn and supportmg mdtenals on October 10, 2002 The Plannmg Department recommends APPROVAL of the FlexIble Development approval to mcrease the height of a wall wlthm the front setback from three feet to SIX feet undel the provIsIOns of Section 3-804 Al , reduce the front (south) setback along Somerset Street from 25 feet to 10 feet (to bUlldmg) and mcrease the heIght from 30 feet to 56 feet (as measured from base flood elevatIOn), as part of a ReSidential lnfdl Project under the provIsIOns of SectIOn 2-404 F for the site at 14 Somerset Street, With the followmg bases and conditIOns BaSIS for Aporoval I The proposal comphes With the FleXible Development cntena as a ReSidentIal InfIll Project per SectIOn 2-404 F 2 The proposal IS m complIance with other standards m the Code mcludmg the general applicability cntena per SectIOn 3-913 3 The applicatIOn IS conSistent WIth the "Old Flonda Dlstnct" m Beach by DeSign 4 The development IS compatible WIth the surroundmg area and Will enhance other redevelopment efforts Staff Report - Commumty Development BOdrd - November 19,2002 - Case FLD2002-09031 - Page 8 Conditions 1 That the denslly of the sIte be limIted to 15 dwellmgs umts (30 dwelltng umts per acre), 2 That the height be lImited to 56 feet as measured from base flood elevatIOn, 3 That the fmal desIgn of the bUlldmgs be conSIstent w1th the conceptual elevatlOns submitted or as modifIed by the CDB, 4 That should addressmg stonnwater Issues result m a sIte plan which 1S slgmflcantly dIfferent from the one approved by the Commumty Development Board, the site plan must be resubmmed to the Board for reV1ew, 5 That all Fire Department reqUlrements, mcludmg gates with an approved emergency entry system and a knox key box on the buildmg for emergency egress, and 6 That all slgnage meet the reqUlrements of Code Prepared by PlannIng Department Staff Mark T Pdrry, Planner ATTACHMENTS Aenal Photograph of Site and V1Cmlty location Map Future Land Use Map Zomng Atlas Map Applicanon S \Plwl!1l/1g Departmelll\C D 8\Fln'IPelldl/lg (aM!\\Up for tile lie\! DRClSomersd 14 Clla"'t\ 011 WIllie Satld\'0,oma~et14 STArr REPORT do( Stdff Report - Community De ve]opment Board - November 19, 2002 - Case FLD2002-09031 - Page 9 ... · ~ 'CI~~rwater - ~ Revised 08/17/2004 u CONSENT AGENDA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD Date: Tuesday, August 17,2004 Time: 1 00 pm * Place: 112 South Osceola Street, 3rd Floor, Clearwater, Flondd, 33756 (City Hall CouncIl Chambers) * Note: This IS an earliei Mart time - Level Two and Level Three ca,e!J (other than the Downtown De,ign Guidelmes) will not be reviewed prior to 2:00 p.m. We1come the CIty of Clearwater COTIUnumty Development Board (CDB) meetmg The CIty strongly supports and fully complies with the Amencans wIth DisabilitIes Act (ADA) Please advIse us at least 72 hours pnor to the meetmg If you require spec181 accommodatIOns Asslstcd hstenmg devIces are avaIlable An oath wIll be admlll1stered sweanng m all participants m pubhc hearmg cases If you wIsh to speak please walt to be recogmzed, then state and spell your name and provldc your address Persons speakIng before the CDB shall be limited to three mmutes unle~s an 1l1dlVldualls represent1l1g a group m WhICh case the ChaIrperson may authorIze a reasonable amount of time up to 10 mInutes Kmdly refrain from conducting private convenatiom, usmg beepen, cellular telephones, etc. that are dl!Jtracting during the meetmg. FlOrIda Statue 286 0105 states Any person appeahng a decIsion of this Board must have a record of the proceedmgs to support such appeal Commmuty Development Code SectIon 4- 206 reqUIres that any person seekmg to personally tcstlfy, present eVidence, argument and WItness, cross-exam1l1e wltnes')c<;, appeal the deCISIon and speak on reconsideration requests should request party status dunng the case diSCUSSion Party status entItles partIes to personally te::.tlfy, present eVIdence, argument and Witnesses, cross-eXdill1lle Witnesses, appeal the deCISIon and speak on reconsIderation requests If you have questions or concerns about a case, please contact the staff presenter from the Plannmg Department lIstcd at the end of each agcnda Item at 727-562A567 * Make Us Your FaVOrIte' www mvclcarwatel com/gov/depts/plannmg A CALL TO ORDER, INVOCATION, PLEDGE OF ALLEGIAi'\fCE B. ROLL CALL Chmr Hooper, VIce ChaIr Doran, Members Gildersleeve, Johnson, MIlam, Moran, Plisko, Alternate Member (Dennehy), City Staff Commulllty Development Board Consent Agenda ~ August 17, 2004 - Page I of 9 ,co JJ3 APPROVAL OF M ITES OF PREVIOUS MEETING: To]) 2004 D, DISCUSSION ITEM (Item 1) I. Case' Downtown Design GUldelmes Applicant: City of Clearwater, Planning Department Request: Review of an update to the Downtown DesIgn Gtlldelmes a') a component of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan Neighborhood Associations: Old Clearwater Bay Neighborhood AssociatIOn (Rowland Milam, 1844 VenetIan Pomt Dnve, Clearwater, FL 33755 phone 727-443-3227), Gatcway Neighbors (Pau] Charles, 1367 Pclrk Street, 33756, phone 813-205-8779), Pierce 100 CondommlUm ASsociatiOn (Terry Turner, tOO Pierce Street #710 Clearwater, FL 33756), Clearwater NClghborhoods CoalitIOn (Doug Williams, President, 2544 Fnsco Dnve, Clearwater, FL 33761, phone 727-725-3345, cmail Dlw@gte net) Presenter: Mark Parry, Planner II E. CONSENT AGENDA The following cases are not contested by the apphcant, staff, nelghbonng property owners, ete and wIll be approved by a smgle vote at the begmnmg of the meetmg (Items 1- 9) These case:-. wIll not be revIewed prior to 2:00 p 111, 1. Case: FLD2004-05036 - 628 Cleveland Street Level Two ApphcatlO/1 Owners: Commumty Redeve]opment Agency and Tone 40, LLC Apphcant: Station Square, LLC Representative: Bnan Murphy (5100 West Kennedy Boulevard, Tampa, FL 33609 phone 813- 387-5336, fax 813-288-0] 88, cell 813-918-2305, e-mail bnanmurphv{a),beckgroup com) Location 097 acres located on the north side of Cleveland Street and south side of Laura Street, approximately 500 feet west of North Myrtle Avenue Atlas Page: 286B Zoning District: Downtown (D) Downtown Plan Character District: Downtown Core Request: Flexlb]e Development approval to permIt a mixed-use development and a buildmg wlthm the reqUired sIght vlSlbillty tnangtes along Laura Street, balcomes along the front (north) fayade along Laura Street which extend 50 mehes mto a public nght-of-way, reductIOn of the reqUired number of parkmg spaces from 229 spaces to 196 spaces, an Increase m the permitted height from 30 feet to 165 feet (bUlldlllg height of 158 feet and a seven foot parapet wall) and an Incrcase of the permltted densIty from 64 dwelhng umts to 126 dwelhng umts by usmg 62 dwellmg umts from the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan area Pubhc Amemt1es Incentive Pool, as a ComprehensIve Infill Redevelopment PrOJect, undcr the provlslOns of Scction 2-903 C and a ComprehensIVe Landscape Program to ehmmate the reqUirement to provide foundatIOn plantmgs, under the provI')lons of SectlOn 3-1202 G Proposed U<;e: A mIxed-use development with 126 attached dwellmgs and 10,000 square feet of restaurant and retml, sales and service Neighborhood AssociatIOn: Clearwater Nelghborhoods CoalitIOn (Doug Wlihams, President, 2544 Fnsc...o Dnve, Clearwater, FL 33761, phone 727-725-3345, email D1W@gte net) Presenter: Mdrk T Parry, Planner II Commumty Development Board Consent Agenda - August t 7, 2004 - Page 2 of 9 , 2. ~ t Case' FLD2004-05( - 610 South Myrtle Avenue Level Two AppllcatlOn Owncl/Apphcant: Re!lglOu,:, Community Services (RCS), Inc ReprcscntatIve F Blake Longacre (c/o Corbett Dcvelopment, 401 Corbett Street, SUIte 110, Clearwater, FL 33756, phone 727-446-9000, fax 727-446-9050, e-mail sllJ1wln(a),laclvli com and fbldev@tampabav IT com) LocatIOn: 2 79 acres located on the south side of Turner Street and west of Myrtle Avenue Atlas Pagc' 2958 Zonmg Distnct CommercIal (C) Request, FlexIble Development approval to permit a mixed use development with reductIOns to the front (east) setback along Myrtle Avenue from 25 feet to 15 feet (to pavement) and 21 feet (to bUlldll1g) and the side (south) setback from 10 tcet to five feet (to pavement), and a bUlldmg hetght mcrease from 25 feet to 59 feet from fil11shed floor elevatiOn (FFE) to roof mldp01l1t, as a ComprehensIve Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provISIOns of SectIOn 2-704 C Proposed Use: Mixed-use development with 48 attached dwellmgs, 2,757 square feet of retail space and ] ,600 square feet of restaurant space Neighborhood Association: Prospect Tower') CondomlOlums (David Perkllls, President, 801 Chestnut Street, Clearwater, FL 33755, phone 727-447-5701), Clearwater NCIghborhoods CoahtlOn (Doug Wtlhams, President, 2544 Fnsco Dnve, Clearwater, FL 33761, phone 727-725- 3345, email D1W@l;!.te net) Presenter: Michael H Reynolds, AICP, Planner III 3, Case: FLD20D4-020 11 /PL T2004-00007 - 2520 Sunset Pomt Road Level Two ApplicatIOn Owner/Apphcant: Global Fmanclal Investments, LLC (FKA Corporate Properties, LLC) and George E Clark Investments, L TD Representative: Jayson T KmlCc, P E , AVid Engmeenng, Inc (2300 Curlew Road, SUlte 100, Palm Harbor, Flonda 34683, phone 727-789-9500, fax 727-784-6662, e-mail ,Iamec@avldcng com) Location: 26384 acres located on the northwest side of Sunset Pomt Road and US Highway 19 N and approximately 400 feet east of East Skylme Dnve Atlas Page' 254B Zoning District: Moblle Home Park (MHP) and MedIUm DenSity Resldentlal (MDR) (pendmg LUZ2003-100II) Request FleXible Development approval with reductIOn of the front (west) setback along Law50n Road from 25 feet to 14 feet (to bUlldmg), from 25 feet to 10 feet (to pavement), reductIOns to front (east) setback along Lawson Road from 25 feet to seven feet (to pdtlOS), from 25 feet to 11 feet to (btuldmg) and from 25 feet to 10 feet (to pavement), a reductIOn of the front (north) setback along Blackburn Street from 25 feet to eIght feet (to pavement), and reductIons to a landscape buffer from 10 feet to seven feet (to patIOs) along the east side of Lawson Road, from 10 feet to SlX feet (to pavement) along the west side of Lawson Road, and from 10 feet to eIght feet (to pavement) along the north side of Blackburn Street, as a Resldenlwl Infill Project, under the proVISIOns of Section 2-304 G and Prehmmary Plat approval for 281 lots, and as a ComprehenSive Landscape Program, under the provlSlOns of SectIOn 3-1202 G Propo~ed Use A reSidential development of 281 attached dwellmgs Neighborhood Association- Sunset Lake E::.tates (Gene Bntten, 2520 Sunset Pomt Road, #86, Clearwater, FL "33763, phone 727-799-1917), Clearwater N elgh borhoods Coah tlOn (Doug Wtlhams, PresIdent, 2544 Fmco Dnve, Clearwater, FL 33761, phone 727-725-3345, emall Dlw@gtc net) Presenter: Michael H Reynolds, AICP, Planner III CommUI11ty Development Soald Consent Agenda - Augu5t 17,2004 - Page 3 of 9 , 4 u1J1I 5, ~ 6. Case: FLD2004-05C .619 South Gulf VIew Boulevard Level Two ApplicatIOn Owner/AplJhcant: Wilham M Shephard Trustee and Lagoon Re:"vrt Motel Representative Blll Woods, Wood:;. Consultmg, Inc (322 Ridge ROdd, Palm Harbor, FL 34683 phone 727-786-5747, fax 727-786-7479, emall blll woods(a!\Voodsconsultmg org) Location: 2 366 acres located on the south side of South Gulfvlew Boulevard, approximately 500 feet east of Harnden Dnve Atlas Page: 285A Zoning District: TOUrist (T) Request: Flexlble development approval for the constructlOn of a 227 5 square-foot addition (prevlOusly constructed without pem1lt) to an eXIstmg 2,775 square-foot commercial dock, under the provIsIOns of SectIOn 3-60 I Proposed Use: Addition to an eXIstmg dotk for Shepard's Neighborhood AssociatJol1' Clearwater Beach ASSOCiatIOn (David MacNamee, 827 Mandalay Ave, Clearwater, FL 33767, phone 727-446-5801, ematl dmacnav(@,att net), Clearwater NeIghborhoods CoahtlOn (Doug Wilham", President, 2544 Fnsco Dnve, Clearwater, FL 33761, phone 727 -725 -3345, emal1 D1\v(ro,gte net) Presenter: Wayne M Wells, AICP, Planner III Case: LUZ2004-05004 - 2995 Drew Street (Related to REZ2004-0500I and FLD2004- 05034/PL T2004-00006) Level Three Applicatwn Owner! A pp licant: Clearwater HOllSI ng Authon ty Representative: Michael Engl1sh, WIlsonMliler (1101 Channelslde Dnve, SUite 440N, Tampa, FL 33602, phone 813-223-9500 fax, 813-223-0009, emall mlchaelenghsh@wil!:>ommller com) Location: 2 7-acres located at the southwest corner of Drew Street and BaYVlew Avenue, Drew Street, approximately 1,200 feet west of McMullen Booth Road Atlas Page 291 B Request (a) Small Scale Land Use Plan amendment from the ResidentIal Urban (RU) ClaSSIficatIOn to the ResldentJal/Office/Retall (RJO!R) ClassificatIOn, and (b) Rezon1l1g from the Low Medmm DensIty Resldent131 (LMDR) Dlstnct to the Commercial (C) DIstnct Proposed Use Mixed Use (Commercial and ResIdential) Neigbborhood Association(s): Island In the Sun MHP ASSOCiatIOn (John Bank, President, 100 Hampton Road, Lot 174, Clearwater, FL 33759, phone 727-799-7711, emall rfnewman@gte net or Inh32@earthlmk nct), Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition (Doug Wllhams, President, 2544 Fnsco Dnve, Clearwater, FL 33761, phone 727-725-3345, emall D)w@gtc net) Presenter G1l1a Clayton, Long Range Planmng Manager ~ Case: REZ2004-0S00 1 - 2995 Drew Street (Related to LUZ2004-05004 and FLD2004- 05034/PLT2004-00006) Level Three Appltcallon Owner/Applicant: Clearwater HOUSlllg Authonty Representative: Michael Engltsh, WIlsonMJ\ler (1101 Channel!:>lde Dnve, SUIte 440N, Tampa, FL 33602, phone 813-223-9500 fax, 813-223-0009, emaIi mlchaelenghsh@wlisonIlllller tom) Location: 3709-acres located at the southwest comer of Drew Street and BaYVIew Avenue, approxlmateIy 1,200 feet west of McMullen Booth Road Atla.. Page 29IB Rcque!:>t Rezomng from the Low MedlUm DenSity Resldenttal (LMDR) Dlstnct to the Mcdmm DenSIty Resldentldl (MDR) Dlstnct Propo:o.ed Use: Smgle-famlly and multi-family resldent131 Neighborhood AssocmtJOn(s): Island 111 the Sun MHP ASSOCIJ.tlOn (John Bank, President, 100 Hampton Road, Lot 174, Clearwater, FL 33759, phone 727-799-7711, emad rfnewmcm@gte net or mh12@earthlmk net), Clearwater NeIghborhoods CoalitIOn (Doug Wtlhams, President, 2544 Fnsco Dnve, Clearwater, FL 33761, phone 727-725-3345, email l)]w@gte net) Presenter G111a Cldyton, Long Range Planmng Manager Commumty Development Board Consent Agenda - August 17, 2004 - Page 4 of 9 , 7 {/ () ')LT2004-00006 - 2995 Drew Street (0 ted to REZ2004-0500 I and Level Two AppllcatlOll Case: FLD2004-05( LUZ2004-05004 ) Owner/Applicant: Clearwater Houslng Authonty Representative: MIchael EnglIsh, WIlsonMIllcr (1101 Channelslde Dnve, SUIte 440N, Tampa, FL 33602, phone 813-223~9500 [ax 813-223-0009, emali mlchaelenglIshC(i)wllsonmdler com) LocatIOn 39 793-acres located at the southwe5t comer of Drew Street and BaYVlew A venue, approxImately 1,200 feel west of McMullen Booth ROdel Atlas Page: 291 B Zoning District: EXlstmg Low MedIUm DensIty ResIdential (LMDR), Proposed MedIUm DensIty ResIdentIal (MDR) and CommefCIal (C) (pendmg LUZ2004-05004/REZ2004-05001) Request: FleXIble Development approval (I) to permIt a mIxed use development (nonresIdentIal and attached dwelhngs) m the proposed Commercial (e) Dlstnct wIth a reductIon to the front (mtemal proposed streets) setback from 25 feet to zero feet (to bUIldIng and pavement) and an mcrease to buddmg heIght from 25 teet to 50 feet, as a ComprehensIVe Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provlslOns of SectlOn 2-704 C, and (2) (a) to penmt attached dwellmgs m the proposed MedlUm DensIty ResIdential (MDR) Dlstnct wIth a reduction to the front (north - Drew Street) setback from 25 feet to 22 feet (to balcomes), reductIOns to the front (east - BayvlCw Boulevard) setback from 25 feet to 15 feet (to pavement) and from 25 feet to 22 feet (to dumpster enclosure), reductIOns to the front (mtemal proposed streets) from 25 feet to 10 feet (to bUlldmg and pavement), an mcrease to bUlldmg heIght from 30 feet to 50 feet and a devlatlon to reduce the heIght of fence or wall from four feet to three feet to screen park1l1g from adjacent parcels or street nghts-of-way, and (b) to perrmt detached dwelImgs wIth a reduction to lot area from 5,000 square feet to 4,600 square feet, a reductIOn to lot Width from 50 feet to 40 feet, a reductIOn to the front (1l1temal proposed streets) setback from 25 feet to 16 feet (to bUlldmg) and from 25 feet to 10 feet (to bUlldmg - comer lots), a reductIon to the SIde setback from five feet to zero feet (to bmld1l1g and pavement) and a deVlatIOn to allow the reduced lot area and WIdth for new lots, as a ResIdential InfiJl ProJect, under the provl::'lons of SeUIOn 2-304 G, (3) a Prehmmary Plat for 25 attached dwelImg (townhome) lot::. and 67 detached dwelling (zero-Iot-hne) lots wIth a reductIOn to the nght-of-way Width for local pubhc streets from 60 feet to 50 feet and (4) the vacation of the Tanglewood Dnve and Sandlewood Dnve nghts-of-way and easements on the subject property Proposed Use: A mlxed-use development of 295 total dwelhng umts (mcludmg 67 detached dwelhngs and 228 attached dwelhngs), 30,000 square feet of rctml use, 5,000 square-foot accessory day care center, 22,000 square-foot accessory commumty center and 5,450 square-foot clubhouse Neighborhood AssociatIOn- Island m the Sun MHP ASSOCiation (John Bank, PreSIdent, 100 Hampton Road, Lot 174, Clearwater, FL 33759, phone 727-799-7711, eroat! rfnewman@gte net or mh32(a)earthhnk net), Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition (Doug Wilhams, Presldent, 2544 Fnsco Dnve, Clearwater, FL 33761, phone 727-725-3345, emml Dlw@gte net) Presenter: Wayne M Wells, AICP, Planner 1II 8, Case: ANX2004-05008 - 2334 Anna Avenue Level Three ApplicatIOn Owner/Apphcant/Representative: Chnstopher Swecker, 2334 Anna Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33765,phone 727-796-0513 Location 0 197-acres located on the north Side of Anna Avenue, approxImately 540 feet west of Dora Dnve Atlas Page 281A Request (a) Annexation of 0 I 96-acles of property to the CIty ofCledrwater, (b) Land Use Plan amendment from the Resldentlal Low (RL) Category (County) to the Resldentlal Low (RL) Category (CIty of Cledrwater), and (c) Rezomng from the R-3, Smgle Farody ResIdential Dlstnct (County) to the LMDR, Low MedIUm DenSIty Resldentlal Dlstnct (CIty of Clearwater) Proposed Use: Smgle-famlly home Neighborhood As~ocidtJOn(~)' Cledrwater Neighborhoods CoahtlOn (Doug Wllhams, PreSIdent, 2544 Fnsco Dnve, Clearwater, FL 33761, phone 727-725-1345, emall Dlw@lo;te net) Presenter Gma Clayton, Long Range Planmng Manager Commumty Development Board Consent Agenda - August 17,2004 - Page 5 of 9 , 9. G Case: ANX2004-0sr - 3108 Downmg Street Level Three Apphcatum Own er/ Ap plica" t' NIll.hae I C1 aramell 0 Representative: George D I-furst, 2528 Northeast Coachman Road, Clearwater, FL 33759, phone 727-723-1612, fax 727-728-n73 LocatIOn, 0 63-acres of propelty located on the north slde ofDowmng Street, approxImately 820 feet north of Gulf to Bay Boulevard Atlas Page 292A Request (a) AnnexatIOn of 0 63-acres to the CIty of Clearwater, (b) Land Use Plan amendment from the ResIdentIal/Office LImIted (RiOL) Category (County), Resldenhal Urban (RU) Category (County) to the ResIdentIal/Office LImited (RJOL) Category (City of Clearwater), ResIdential Urban (RU) Category (C1ty of Clearwater), and (c) Rezonmg from the ProfeSSIonal Office (P-1A) Dlstnct (County), Residential Smgle-Famlly (R-3) Dlstnct (County) to the Office (0) Dlstnct (City of Clearwater) and Low MedIUm DenSIty Resldenttal (LMDR) Dlstnct (City of Clearwater) Proposed Use, Office Neighborhood Association(s): Clearwater NeIghborhoods Coal1tlOn (Doug WillIams, PresIdent, 2544 Fn!:.co Dnve, Clearwater, FL 33761, phone 727-725-3345, emat! Dlw(cijgte net) Presenter Gma Clayton, Long Range Planmng Manager F. CONTINUED ITEMS (Items 1-2) These Lases wllllZol be reviewed prior to 2.00 p.m. 1. Case: FLD2004-03018 - 669 Bay Esplanade Level Two ApplicatIOn Owner: Vlrgmw Franks Applicant Radcltffe Development Company, LLC Representative: Keith Zayak (101 Phlltppe Parkway, Safety Harbor, FL 34695 phone 727-793- 9888, e-mail kelth(qJ.kelthzavak com) and Robert Flynt Location: 0 148-acres located on the east SIde of Bay Esplanade, approximately 300 teet south of Somerset Street Atlas Page: 258A Zonmg Dlstnct: Tounst (T) Request: FleXible Development approval to develop four resIdential attached dwellIng umts on a 6,479 square foot lot (10,000 square feet IS reqUired), With a mmlmum lot Width of 60 feet (100 feet IS reqUIred), a reductlOn m the front setback from 15 feet to SIX feet to pavement, a reductlOn m the Side (south) setback from 10 feet to zero feet to wooden deck walkway, a reductIOn of the Slde (north) setback from 10 feet to eIght feet (to bUlldmg), a reductIon of the rear setback from 20 feet to 10 feet to wooden deck, and a bUlldmg helght mcrease from 35 feet to 51 83 feet from FEMA to roofmldpomt under the prOVIsions ot SectIOn 2-803 B Proposed Use: Attached dwelhngs Neighborhood ASSOCiatIOn: Clearwater Beach ASSOClatlOn (DavId MacNamee, 827 Mandalay Ave, Clearwater, FL 33767, phone 727-446-5801, emall dmacnav@att net), Clearwater Nelghborhoods CoalttlOn (Doug Wtlhams, PresIdent, 2544 Fnsco Dnve, Clearwater, FL 33761, phone 727-725-3345, ematl Dlw({V,ate net) Presenter: MIchael H Reynolds, AICP, Planner 1II Commumty Development Board Consent Agenda - August 17,2004 - Pdge 6 of 9 2. Case: FLD2004-04C ,517 SkyVICW Avenue Level Two ApplicatIOn Owner/Applicant' JUdnn A Palmen Repre\entatlve Stephen Fowler (142] Court St, Cledrwater, FL 33756 phone 727-449-2021, fax 727-447-5339, emaIl fowlerar(,h(Waol com) Location: 0 59-acres located on the ea')t side of Flonda Avenue, approxlmately 200 feet south of Gulf to Bay Boulevard Atlas Page: 297 A Zonmg Distnct. Low MedIUm DenSity Residential (LMDR) Request: Flexible Development approval to pennIt the converSIon of a smgle-famlly detached dwellmg ll1to an attached dwelhng (duplex) under the provls1Ons of Sectlon 2-204 E as a ResidentIal Infill Project Proposed Use: Duplex m aSSOciatIOn With an eXlstmg smgle-famtly home Neighborhood A"soclation: Clearwater Neighborhood,,; Coa11t1On (Doug Wtlltams, President, 2544 Fnsco Dnve, Clearwater, FL 33761, phone 727-725-3345, ematl D1W@gte net) Presenter: Michael H Reynolds, A]CP, Planner III G, LEVEL TWO APPLICATIONS (Items 1-2) 1. Case: FLD2004-04023/SGN2004-070 1 0 - 445 Harnden Dnve Owner/Applicant: Fulvlo and Maddalena Dlvello Representative: PatncIa Stough, Patti the Architect, lnc (1634 San Roy Dnve, DunedIn, FL 34698 phone 727-733-1769, fax 727-733-3769, ematl parch@gate net) LocatIOn: I 8 acres located at the northeast comer of Harnden Dnve and South Gulfvlew Boulevard Atlas Page: 276A z...ning District: Tounst (T) Request FleXible Development approval to Termmate the Status of a Nonconforrmty for denSIty wlthm the Tounst Dlstnct to permIt the relocatIOn of five overnight aecommodatlon UOItS from the southern bmldmg (BUlld1l1g A) to the northem bUlldmg (Bmldmg B) and the conversIOn of five overmght accommodatiOn umts m the southern bmldmg (Buddmg A) to accessory storage and hotel office usage With a reduction to the front (west) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to eXlstmg pavement), a reductlon to the front (south) setback from] 5 feet to seven feet (to eXIstmg pavement), a reductIOn to the side (north) setback from 10 feet to three feet (to eXlstmg pavement), a reductIon to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to three feet (to eXistIng pavement), an mcrease to height from 35 feet to 48 feet (exlstmg BUlldmg A) and from 35 feet to 67 feet (exlstmg BUlldmg B) and to ehmmate the five-foot wide foundatton landscape area adjacent to the southern bmldmg (BUlldmg A), under the proVIsIOns of Sectton 6-109 C and Sectton 2-803 I, with a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the proVISions of Section 3-1202 G Proposed Use: Overnight accommodatIOn use of a proposed total of 110 umts Neighborhood Association: Clearwater Beach AssoClatlOn (DavId MacNarnee, 827 Mandalay Ave, Clearwater, FL 33767, phone 727-446-5801, ematl dmacnavrmatt net), Clearwater Neighborhoods Coahtlon (Doug WtliJarns, President, 2544 Fnsco Dnve, Clearwater, FL 33761, phone 727-725-3345, ematl D1\'I@gte net) Presenter: Wayne M Wells, AlCP, Planner III Commumty Development Board Consent Agenda - August 17,2004 - Page 7 of9 2. Case. FLD2004-02r - 100 Coronado DrIve and 201,215 ani 9 South Gulpllew Boulevard (Related to DV A2004-UOOO I) Owners: Antomos Markopoulos, T M Megas dnd Kolossos Inn, loe Applicant: AntOl11os Markopoulos Representative: M Lisa Shasteen, Esq (2920 Harbor View Avenue, Tampa, FL 33611, phone 813-220-3000, fax 813-831-8140) LocatIOn: 2 739 acres located to the south of and between South GulfvlCw Boulevard dnd Coronado Dnve Atlas Page: 276A Zonmg District: TourIst (T) Request: (1) Flexlblc Development approval to Tennmate the Status of a Nonconformity for density within the Tounst Drstnct, under the proVISIOns of SectlOn 6-109 C, (2) FlexIble Development approval to permit 350 overmght accommodatIon umts and 75 attached dwellings as a mixed use (wlth lI1crease m densIty of 250 hotel rooms from the Beach by De~lgn denSIty pool), wlth a reductIOn to the front (east along Coronado Dnve) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to bUl1dll1g), a reductIon to the front (south along proposed Second Street) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to bUlldll1g), a reductIOn to the front (west and north along South Gulfvlew Boulevard) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to bmldmg), an Increase to the bUlldmg height from 35 feet to 150 feet (to roof deck) with an additIOnal five feet for penmeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additIonal 33 feet for elevator, stair, mechamcal rooms/archItectural embelhshments (from roof deck), deVIatIOns to allow stacked parkmg, allow access to a major artenal street and allow a bUilding wlthm the reqUired sIght VISlbillty tnangles at the lI1tersectlOn of Coronado Dnve and proposed Second Street, as a ComprehenSive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the proV1Slons of Section 2-803 C, and to ehmmate the reqUired foundatIOn landscapmg along Coronado Dnve and proposed Second Street, as a ComprehenSive Landscape Program, under the prOVISIons of SectIOn 3-1202 G, and (3) the vacatIon of a portIOn the nght-of-way for Gulfvlew Boulevard between Coronado Dnve and proposed Second Street, the vacatIOn of the Fmt Street nght-of-way between Coronado Dnve and Gulf vIew Boulevard, the dedicatIOn of flght-of-way for proposed Second Street between Coronado Avenue and Gulfvlew Boulevard and the dedicatIon of flght-of-way for Coronado Dnve between proposed Second Street and Gulfvlew Boulevard Proposed Use: Hotel of 350 rooms (127 78 rooms/acre), 75 attached dwellmgs (27 38 umts/acre) and a maximum of 37,000 square feet (0 31 FAR) of amemtles accessory to the hotel, at a height of 150 feet (to roof deck) with an addltlOnaJ five feet for penmeter parapet':> (from root deck) and an additIonal 33 feet for elevator, stair, mechamcal rooms/archItectural cmbellishments (from roof deck) Neighborhood ASSOCiation: Clearwater Beach ASSOCiation (DaVId MacNamee, 827 Mandalay Ave, Clearwater, FL 33767, phone 727-446-5801, email dmacnavr@att net), Clearwater NeIghborhoods Coal1tIon (Doug Wllhams, PreSident, 2544 Fnsco Dnve, Clearwater, FL 33761, phone 727-725-3345, ematl DlwtmQte net) Presenter: Wayne M Wells, AICP, Planner 111 Commulllty Development Board Consent Agenda - Augu<;t 17,2004 - Page 8 of 9 . H. LEVEL THREE AI lCATIONS (Item 1) 1 Case: DV A2004-0000 1 - 100 Coronado Vnve and 201 215 and 219 South Gulf view Boulevard (Related to F LD2004-020 1'3) Owners: AntoOlos Markopoulos, T M Megas and Kolos!:.os Inn, loe Applicant' AntoOlos Mdrkopoulos Representative M Lisa Shasteen, Esg (2920 Harbor View Avenue, Tampa, FL 33611, phone 813-220-3000, fax 813-831-8140) LocatIOn: 2739 acres located to the south of and between South Gulfvlew Boulevard and Coronado Dnve Atla.. Page: 276A Zoning DistrIct: T ounst (T) Request: ReView of, and recommendatJon to the C1ty Council, of a Development Agreement between AntoOlos Markopoulos, T M Megas and Kolossos Inn, fnc (the property owners) and the C1ty of Clearwater Proposed Use: Hotel of 350 rooms (127 7 8 rooms/acre), 75 attached dwellmgs (27 38 UOl t../ ac re) and a maximum of 37,000 square teet (0 31 FAR) at amemtles acce!:.sory to the hotel, at a heIght of 150 feet (to roo f deck) wlth an addltl anal fi ve feet for penmeter para pets (from roo f deck) and an addttlOnal 33 feet for elevator, stmr, mechamcal rooms/archttectural embelhshments (from roof deck) Neighborhood AssociatIOn: Clearwater Beach ASSOCiation (DavId MacNamee, 827 Mandalay Ave, Clearwater, FL 33767, phone 727-446-5801, emall dmacnav@att net), Clearwater Nelghborhoods CoahtlOn (Doug Wt!ltams, President, 2544 Fnsco Dnve, Clearwater, FL 33761, phone 727-725-3345, emat! D1W@gte net) Presenter: Wayne M Wells, AICP, Planner III I. DIRECTOR'S ITEMS: DISCUSSIon ofreqmred data shown on submItted elevatlOns J. ADJOURNMENT S \PlwlIlJltg IJepm liJJel1/IC D Blagenda!. DRC & CDBlCDBI1004108 Augu\ I 17 20041CDB Comell/ Agi'ilda August 17 2004 doc Commumty Development Board Consent Agenda - August 17, 2004 - Page 9 of 9 \ CDB Meetmg Date Case Number Agenda Item Apphcant Address August 17. 2004 FLD2004-030 18 El Radchffe Development Company. LLC 669 Bay Esplanade CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTl\1ENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: FlexIble Development approval to penrut attached dwellings with (1) a reductIon of the mInimUm lot area from 10,000 square feet to 6,479 square feet; (2) a reduction of mInimUm lot width from 100 feet to 60 feet, (3) a reductIOn of the front setback from 15 feet to SIX feet (to pavement), (4) a reduction of the sIde (south) setback from 10 feet to zero feet to wooden walkway, (5) a reductIOn of the sIde (north) setback from 10 feet to eight feet (to bUlldmg), (6) a reductIon of the rear setback from 20 feet to 10 feet (to deck), and (7) a bUlldmg heIght mcrease from 35 feet to 51 83 feet from FEMA to mIdpomt of the roof under the provIsIOns of SectIOn 2- 803 B EXISTING ZONING! LAND USE: Tounst (T) DIstnct, Resort Faclhtles High (RFH) Category PROPERTY SIZE: o 148 acres, 6,479 square feet PROPERTY USE: Current Use Apartments (8 umts) Proposed Use Multi-family residential (4 umts) ADJACENT ZONINGI LAND USES: North Tounst DIstnct (T), OvernIght accommodatIOns West Tounst DIstnct (T), OvernIght accommodatIons and attached dwellmgs East Cleatwater Harbor and Tounst DIstnct (T), Clearwater Harbor South Tounst Dlstnct (T), Attached dwellmgs CHARACTER OF THE IMl\1EDIATE VICINITY: ScenIC north-south beach comdor, overnIght lodgmg, multi-family reSidential, and commercial Staff Report - Commumty Development Board - August ] 7, 2004 - Case Fl.D2004-030 18 - Page I UPDATE: ThIs case was contmued from the July 20, 2004 Commumty Development Board meetmg after a lengthy dIscussIon A motIOn to approve the case faIled by a vote of 2-3 and the case was automatIcally contInued The staff report and submittal remaIn unchanged ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: ThIS 0 148-acre site IS located on the east SIde of Bay Esplanade, approxImately 300 feet south of Somerset Street Ovenllght accommodatIOns and attached dwellmgs dOITllnate the Immediate vlclmty to the west, south, and north By Code, the allowable density on thiS SIte IS five hotel umts or four dwelling umts The site contaInS an eXIstmg, SIngle-story, elght-umt apartment bUIldIng, WIth back out parkmg on Bay Esplanade There IS an eXlstmg deck on the east SIde of the site and an eXIstmg walkway from the front of the SIte to the rear along the south property lIne The eXIstIng bUildIng and ItS parkIng area fIt tIghtly onto the SIte There IS liITllted landscapIng There IS one eXIstIng dock, located at the east Side of the Site, IS proposed to remam by thIS redevelopment request The SIte IS located wlthm the special area redevelopment plan, Beach by DeSIgn, as part of the "Old Honda" Dlstnct ThiS area has been deSIgnated for multI-fannly townhomes and cOndOminIUmS of low to mldnse The Immemate vIcImty IS almost entIrely composed of attached dwellings and small motels BUildIng styles generally resemble archItecture from the 1950's and appear to have been progressIvely expanded Bay Esplanade, In thiS general VIC1OIty, IS a local street WIth no SIdewalks where many SItes rely on the publIc nght-of-way to accommodate perpendIcular, back-out parkIng Generally, the streetscape IS 10 need of redevelopment to Improve parkmg, pedestnan access, and ItS aesthetIc appearance Beach by Deslgn recogmzes site constramts of parcels m the neIghborhood and dIfficultIes of redevelopment Proposal: The proposal IS to completely raze the eXIstmg apartments and construct four attached dwellIngs ("La RIsa n") The applIcatIon IS seekmg approval of the use, lot SIze and Width reductions, setback reductlOns, plus an Increase m height The proposal shows SIX on-site parkmg spaces at ground level The bUIldmg IS proposed to be four stones above parlang and reach to 51 83 feet from a FEMA bUlldmg hne to roof mldpomt ThIS sIte IS located wIthm a flood zone (Zone AE) With an elevatIOn of 11 feet The bUildIng elevatIOns show four stones WIth a rooftop terrace over parkmg There 15 an elevator overrun tower extendmg over the roof terrace The deSign of the bUildIng mcludes arched stylmg With some of the doorways and wmdows Large wmdows are show on the east elevatIon, WIth views of Clearwater Harbor The plans show the bUlldmgs to have a beIge color stucco fmIsh WIth a red-brown color roof Wmdows are proposed to have aluITllnum fraITllng WIth a precast stone look tnm The roof IS shown to have a clay tIle miSSIOn shape Wrought Iron raIlmgs Will be attached to walkways and platforms outsIde the bUlldmg on five levels The north and west elevatIons show a decorative architectural medallion on the north and west SIdes of the elevator tower Extenor staIrs are shown on the north elevation, from the ground level to the roof Wmdows and doors proposed on the north and south elevatIons do not meet BUIldmg Code The setbacks as proposed hrolt the use of wmdows and doors to 10 percent of the bUIldmg far;ade Staff Report - Community Development Board - August 17, 2004 - Case FLD2004-030] 8 - Page 2 ~ Vehicular and pedestnan safety would be Improved, as there wIll no longer be any back out parkIng onto Bay Esplanade A wooden walkway IS proposed along the south side of the property for access to the rear deck and dock Five cabanas and a rest room are shown on the site plan at the rear of the Site The deck and dock amemty IS proposed to be shared wIth resIdents of a resIdentIal development across the street to the west, (La RIsa I), Trash collectIOn IS proposed to be made from a sohd waste dumpster located tOslde the bUlldmg at the front (west SIde) of the site The dumpster IS to be rolled out by complex mamtenance to a stagmg area WhIle there IS a landscape plan, the proposed setbacks reduce the opportumty for green space A six-foot hIgh opaque fence IS proposed along the south Side of the property Prehmmary stonnwater deSIgn has been addressed The deSign IS essentIally complete Beach by Deslgn does not speCifIcally suggest the development as proposed by thIS applIcatIOn Beach by Deslgn reads III part," the scale and mtensIty of the area, with relatIvely few exceptIOns, IS substantIally less than comparable areas to the south" The document contemplates "hmIted new constructIOn where renovation IS not practical" What IS proposed IS a substantIal Illcrease m scale to what eXIsts wlth10 the Old Flonda Dlstnct The development IS not Visually mterestmg and the mass10g and scale do not comply with the 10tended character of the "Old Flonda DIStnCt" and Beach by Deslgn The apphcatIon proposes to maXimIze the allowable denSity and IS seek10g seven vanatlOns from the Code to make thiS project work (reductIOns to lot Size, WIdth, setbacks, and an Illcrease III bUlldmg heIght) The proposed use IS acceptable, but the overall scale IS not compatible with the eXIstmg surroundmg land uses The proposed reductIOn m lot area WIll result III a bUlldmg, whIch IS out of scale wIth eXIstmg bUIldmgs 10 the ImmedIate vIcImty of the parcel proposed for development The proposed Increased III height does not result m an Improved sIte plan or Improved deSign and appearance The proposed reductIOns m SIde setbacks do not result III an Improved site plan, more effiCient parkmg or Improved desIgn and appearance Development of the land, as proposed, will not be III harmony wIth the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent propertIes DeSign of the proposed development does not numnuze VIsual adverse Impacts on adjacent properties CODE ENFORCEMENT ANALYSIS: There are no outstandmg enforcement Issues associated With thIS site Slaff Report - Commumty Development Board - Augusl 17, 2004 - Case FLD2004-030 18 - Page 3 ~ STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: (Section 2-301.1 and 2-304): STANDARD PROPOSED CONSISTENT NCONSISTENT MAXIMUM Four dwellmg umts X DENSITY (maximum of four dwelling units permitted) IMPERVIOUS 075 X SURFACE RATIO (ISR) (maximum ISR is .95) LOT AREA (10,000 o 148 acres, 6,479 square feet X* square feet is minimum requirement) LOT WIDTH (100 60 feet at nearest pomt x* feet minimum required) FRONT SETBACK SIX feet at closest pomt (to pavement) X* (35 feet minimum required) REAR SETBACK (20 10 feet (to deck) X* feet ' , nnmmum require men t) SIDE SETBACK (10 North eight feet X* feet . . , South zero feet to walkway mIDlmum requirement) HEIGHT (35 . 100 51 83 feet X* feet allowable FLD r3Dl!e) PARKING SPACES SIX spaces, 1 5 spaces per umt X (1.5 per unit required) * See analysts above for ruscusslOn Staff Report, Community Development Board - August 17, 2004 - Case Fl.D2004-030 18 - Page 4 ~ FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA (Section 2-803.B) applicable to lot area and width, building h . ht d tb k el~1 an se ac s: ConsIStent Inconsistent 1 The reductIOn In lot area will not result In a bUIldIng, WhICh IS out of scale wIth eXlstmg bUIldIngs In the Immediate VICInity of the parcel [X] proposed for development 2 The use of the parcel proposed for development will not Involve dIrect [X] access to an artenal street 3 The Increased height results In an Improved site plan or Improved [ ] [X] desIgn and appearance 4 The mcreased height IS necessary to allow the Improvement of off- [X] [ ] street parkIng on the ground floor of the resIdenttal bUlldmg 5 The reductton In side setback does not prevent access to the rear of [ ] [X] any butldmg by emergency vehIcles 6 The reductton m sIde setback results In an Improved site plan, more [ ] [X] efficient parkIng or Improved deSign and appearance GENERAL STANDARDS (Section 3-913): Consistent Inconsistent 1 Development of the land will be In harmony wIth the scale, bulk, [ ] [X] coverage, denSity and character of adJacent properties 2 Development wIll not hInder or dJscourage development and use of [X] [ J adjacent land and bUIldJngs or sIgmfIcantly Impair the value thereof 3 Development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons [X] [ ] resIdmg or workIng In the neighborhood 4 Development IS deSigned to mmUTIlze traffic congestIOn [X] [ ] 5 Development IS consistent WIth the commumty character of the [ ] [X] Immediate VICInity 6 DeSign of the proposed development mInimIZeS adverse effects, [ ] [X] mcludmg visual, acoustIC and olfactory and hours of operatton Impacts on adjacent propertIes Staff Report - Commumty Development Board - August 17, 2004 - Case FLD2004,030 18 - Page 5 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Comnuttee revIewed the applicatIOn and supportmg matenals at Its meetmgs on May 6,2004 and June 10,2004 The Planmng Department recommends DENIAL of the Flexible Development applIcatIOn to develop four resIdenttal attached dwelhng umts on (1) a 6,479 square foot lot (10,000 square feet IS reqUIred), wIth (2) a minImum lot width of 60 feet (100 feet IS reqUired), seekIng (3) a reductlOn In the front setback from 15 feet to SIX feet to pavement, (4) a reductIOn m the side (south) setback from 10 feet to zero feet to wooden deck walkway, (5) a reductton of the sIde (north) setback from 10 feet to eIght feet (to buddmg), (6) a reductIOn of the rear setback from 20 feet to 10 feet to wooden deck, and (7) a bUIldmg heIght Increase from 35 feet to 51 83 feet from FEMA to roof nudpomt under the provlSlons of SectIOn 2-803 B Bases for Demal: 1. The proposal does not comply WIth the FlexIble Development cntena per SectIOn 2-803 B 2 The proposal IS not In comphance With other standards In the Code mcludmg the General Appltcablhty Cntena per SectIOn 3-913 3 The development IS not compatible WIth the surroundmg area and wIll not enhance other redevelopment efforts m the VlcImty of the site 10catlOn, 4 The proposed development IS mconsIstent WIth what IS proposed wlthm Beach by DeSign for property wlthm the Old Flonda Dlstnct Prepared by Planmng Department Staff M1chael H Reynolds, AICP, Planner ill ATI ACHMENTS Aenal Photograph of Site and Vlcmlty LocatIOn Map Future Land Use Map Zomng Atlas Map ApplIcatIOn S \Plannmg Department\C D iJlFLElN'endmg cases\Upfor rile next CDEIlBay E~planade 669 La RIm II (TNJay E~planade 669 StaffReportll for Augusr 17 2004 meelmg doc Staff Report - Community Development Board - August 17, 2004 - Case FLD2004-030 18 - Page 6 ~ ) ') III (l!~~ ~~~~~l~F rilt....~ ~{~ ~'L".'7~~~ lio~~" ~....~(~.... ~;-,;.... \ I, "':. '" ':. ~~'Ii.......\. t' .F ~....,..~ tl~ · - .' '~q ~ . - .......ll ...c..;, :..::::=- ~~ ",10' ~ . ~ L'i:''' ...~... ---==- . "'-.~ -;'~~~~"~\Sf~\\ -,_,!)11E~'d' J 1 '--.QJJ:J1f-" CITY OF CLEARWATER loNG RANGE PlANNING DEVELOPMENT REvIEW PlANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUIWING, 100 SOUTH MYRnE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONI: (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 October 22,2004 Mr KeIth Zayak Keith Zayak & Associates, Ine 101 PhIlIppe Parkway Safety Harbor, Flonda 34695 RE Development Order - Case FLD2004-030 18 - 669 Bay Esplanade Dear Mr Zayak This letter constItutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206D,6 of the Commumty Development Code On October 19, 2004, the CommunIty Development Board revIewed your FlexIble Development applIcatton to pernut attached dwellIngs with (1) a reductIOn of the nummum lot area from 10,000 square feet to 6,479 square feet, (2) a reductIOn of nummum lot wIdth from 100 feet to 60 feet; (3) a reductIOn of the front setback from 15 feet to 569 feet (to pavement), (4) a reductton of the sIde (south) setback from 10 feet to four feet to extenor stmrs, (5) a reductton of the side (north) setback from 10 feet to 672 feet (to bUlldmg); (6) a reductIon of the rear setback from 20 feet to 10 feet (to wooden deck); and (7) a bUlldmg height mcrease from 35 feet to 51 83 feet from FEMA to nndpomt of the roof under the provIslOns of Section 2- 803 B for the SIte at 669 Bay Esplanade Based on the applIcatIon and the Staff recommendatIOn, the Commumty Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the applIcatIOn WIth the followmg condItIOns ConditIOns of Approval 1 That the fmal deSIgn and color of the bUIldmg be consistent With the conceptual elevatIOns subnutted to, or as modtfIed by, the CDB, 2 That boats moored at the eXIstmg and any future docks be for the exclUSive use by the reSIdents and/or guests ofthe condonunIums, 3 That all sIgnage meet Code and be archItecturally-mtegrated mto the deSign of the SIte and bUIldmg, 4 That there be no Jet ski or other lIke watercraft rental busmesses at thiS locatIOn, 5 That the SWFWlVlD penrut or letter of exceptIOn be proVIded to Plannmg staff pnor to any bmldmg penmt Issuance, 6 That a revIsed landscape plan be sublTIltted to the satIsfactIOn of Plannmg staff, pnor to any bUIldmg penrut Issuance, 7 That a revIsed tree survey be subnntted to the sattsfactIOn of Plannmg staff, pnor to any bmldmg penmt Issuance, BRIAN J AUN(;) I, /VL\ YOR-COMMJ",JONfR HoY! HAMlllOI'!, VICe l\1AYOR COMMI",IONfR WeJl [Nl'Y GRA'>, CO\j~ll,~IOI'.J R rHJ\!\~ H!llllARD, COMMl'>510NfR @ 13111 101'1'>0]\, COOI,\II~'lor'J R "EQUAl EMPI OYMrNT AND Ai IIRJ\1A IIVI Au ION [MPI OYrR" \ ') ') .... October 22,2004 KeIth Zayak, Page Two 8 That the fire servIce plpehne mstallatIOn be addressed to the satisfactIOn of Engmeenng staff, poor to bUIldmg penrut Issuance, 9 That Open Space, Recreation Land and RecreatlOn FacIl1ty Impact fees be satisfied pnor to the Issuance of bUIldmg permIts or final plat, whichever occurs fIrst, 10 That all FIfe Department requIrements be addressed poor to bUIldmg penrut Issuance, 11. That all proposed utll1tles (from the nghts-of-way to the proposed bUIldmgs) be placed underground and mstallatlon of condU1t(s) along the entlIe length of the site's street frontages be completed poor to the Issuance of the fIrst certificate of occupancy; 12 That Traffic Impact Fees be detemnned and patd poor to CertIficate of Occupancy Issuance, 13 That the condorrumum plat be recorded WIth Pmellas County pnor to the fIrst CertifIcate of Occupancy, and 14 That the applIcant mstall a six-foot bnck wall along the south property lme, consIstent with the revIsed site plan, so as to redirect pedestnan traffIc onto the adjacent southern property Pursuant to SectlOn 4-407, an apphcatlOn for a bUIldmg perrrut shall be made wIthm one year of FleXible Development approval (by October 19, 2005) All reqUIred certificates of occupancy shall be obtamed wIthm one year of the date of Issuance of the bUIldmg pemnt Time frames do not change With successive owners The Commumty Development Coordmator may grant an extensIOn of time for a penod not to exceed one year and only wIthm the ongmal penad of vahdJty The Commumty Development Board may approve one addItIOnal extensIOn of tIme after the Commumty Development CoordJnator's extension to Imtlate a bUlldmg penrut apphcatlon, The Issuance of thiS Development Order does not relIeve you of the necessIty to obtam any bUIldmg perrruts or pay any Impact fees that may be requIred In. order to facIhtate the Issuance of any penrut or lIcense affected by thIS approval, please bnng a copy of thIS letter WIth you when applymg for any permIts or lIcenses that reqUIre thIS pnor development approval AddItlonally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (FlexIble Development) may be InItlated pursuant to SectIon 4-502 B by the applIcant or by any person granted party status wlthm 14 days of the date of the Commumty Development Board meetmg The filIng of an applIcation/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the deCISIOn pendmg the fmal determmatlOn of the case The appeal penod for your case explfes on November 2, 2004 If you have any questIOns, please do not heSItate to call Michael H Reynolds, AICP, Planner m, at 727-562-4836 You can access zomng mformatlOn for parcels wIthm the CIty through our websIte www clearwater-fl com ) ') III October 22, 2004 KeIth Zayak, Page Three Smcerely, ~~' Cynthia H, Tarapam, AICP Planmng DIrector S \Planning Deparlment\C. D B\FLEXVnacllVe or FinIshed Appllcallons\Bay Esplanade 669 La Rlsa 1I (T) 10 19 04 CDB 'ApprovecNJay Esplanade 669 Development Order October 22, 2004 doc CDB Meeting Date Case Number Agenda Item Applicant Address October 19,2004 FLD2004-030 18 E2 Radcliffe Development Company, LLC 669 Bav Esplanade ALTERNATE APPROVAL CONDITIONS The follOWing are potentIal condItIons that may be lInposed should the applicatIon be approved ConditIOns of Approval 1 That the final desIgn and color of the bUIlding be consIstent WIth the conceptual elevatIOns submItted to, or as modified by, the CDB, 2 That boats moored at the eXIsting and any future docks be for the exclusIve use by the resIdents and/or guests of the condonumums, 3 That all slgnage meet Code and be archItecturallY-integrated Into the design of the sIte and bUIldmg, 4 That there be no Jet ski or other lIke watercraft rental busmesses at thiS locatIon; 5 That the SWFWMD permit or letter of exceptlOn be provided to Planning staff pnor to any bUIlding penrut Issuance, 6, That a revIsed landscape plan be subnutted to the satIsfactIOn of Planmng staff, pnor to any bUIlding permIt Issuance, 7 That a revised tree survey be submItted to the sattsfactIOn of Planmng staff, pnor to any budding permIt Issuance, 8 That the fire service pIpelIne installatIon be addressed to the satisfactIon of Engmeenng staff, pnor to bUIldmg pernut Issuance, 9 That Open Space, Recreation Land and Recreatton FacIhty Impact fees be satIsfied pnor to the Issuance of bUIlding penruts or final plat, whIchever occurs fust, 10 That all Fue Department reqUIrements be addressed pnor to bUIldmg pernut Issuance, 11 That all proposed utlhttes (from the nghts-of-way to the proposed bUIldings) be placed underground and installatIon of condUIt(s) along the entIre length of the sIte's street frontages be completed pnor to the Issuance of the fust certIfIcate of occupancy, 12 That Trafftc Impact Fees be determined and paid pnor to CertIficate of Occupancy Issuance, and 13 That the condominIUm plat be recorded WIth Plnellas County pnor to the first Certificate of Occupancy S \Plrmnmg Depanmen!\C D l1IFLEX\Pendmg cme~\Upfor lhe next CDlNJay EIoplanade 669lA Rlsa 1/ (T) 92104 CDlNJay Esplanade 669 Draft Approval Condltons, October 19,2004 dor CDB Meetmg Date Case Number Agenda Item Applicant Address October 19. 2004 FLD2004-030 18 E2 Radcliffe Development Company, LLC 669 Bay Esplanade DRAFT AL TERNA TE APPROVAL CONDITIONS The followmg are potentIal conditIons that may be Imposed should th pphcatlOn be approved ConditIOns of Approval 1 That the fmal desIgn and color of the bUIldmg be conSIstent WIth the conceptual elevatIons submItted to, or as modified by, the CDB, 2 That boats moored at the eXlstmg and any future docks be for the exclusive use by the residents and/or guests of the condommIUms, 3 That all slgnage meet Code and be archItecturally-mtegrated mto the desIgn of the sIte and bUIldmg, 4 That there be no Jet SkI or other hke watercraft rental busmesses at thIS locatIon, 5. That the SWFWMD permit or letter of exceptIOn be provIded to Planmng staff pnor to any bUIldmg permit Issuance, 6 That a revised landscape plan be submItted to the satIsfactIon of Planmng staff, pnor to any bUlldmg permit Issuance, 7 That a revised tree survey be submItted to the satisfactIon of Planmng staff, pnor to any bUlldmg penmt Issuance, 8 That the fire service pIpelIne mstallatlOn be addressed to the satIsfactIon of Engmeenng staff, pnor to bUlldmg permIt Issuance; 9 That Open Space, RecreatIon Land and RecreatIOn FacIlIty Impact fees be satIsfied pnor to the Issuance of bUIldmg permIts or final plat, whIchever occurs fIrst, 10 That all Fire Department requIrements be addressed pnor to bUIldmg permIt Issuance, 11 That all proposed utilities (from the nghts-of-way to the proposed bUIldmgs) be placed underground and mstallatlOn of condUIt(s) along the entire length of the SIte's street frontages be completed pnor to the Issuance of the fIrst certificate of occupancy, 12 That Traffic Impact Fees be determmed and paId pnor to Certificate of Occupancy Issuance, and 13 That the condommIUm plat be recorded with Pmellas County pnor to the fIrst CertIficate of Occupancy 5 \Planmng Depanmen^C D E1\FLEX\Pendmg cai>eiAUp for the next CDlNJay E~planade 669 La Rlsa II (T) 921 04 CDlNJay Esplanade 669 Draft Approval CondJlons, October 19,2004 doc SEHDIHG REPORT Oct 06 2004 01,34PM YOUR LOGO YOUR FRX NO CltyOfClearwater-Plan Dept 727 562 4865 NO OTHER FACSIMILE 01 97939855 START TIME USRGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT Oct. 05 01'33PM 01'28 SND 02 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT. PRESS 'MENU' 1tB4. ~ SElECT OFF BY U5ING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE. PlEASE a:lLL I-B00-HEI....P-FAX (435-7329). ,'" , ,.;) /J> CDB Meeting DJte Case Number Agenda Item Appilcdnt Address ORIGINAL SePtember 21. 2004 FLD2004-030 18 E2 Rddchffe Development Company, LLC 669 Bav Esplanade CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMA TION: REQUEST: EXISTING ZONING/ LAND USE: PROPERTY SIZE: PROPERTY USE: ADJACENT ZONING/ LAND USES: FlexIble Development approval to permit attached dwellIngs with (I) a reductIOn of the minimum lot area from 10,000 square feet to 6,479 square feet, (2) a reductIOn of mlmmum lot width from 100 fcet to 60 feet, (3) a reductIOn of the front setback from 15 feet to 569 feet (to pavement), (4) a reductIOn of the side (south) setback from 10 feet to four feet to extenor staIrs, (5) a reductIOn of the side (north) setback from 10 teet to 672 feet (to bUIldmg), (6) a reductIOn of the reat setback from 20 feet to 10 feet (to wooden deck), and (7) a buIldmg height mcrease from 35 feet to 51 83 feet from FEMA to mldpomt of the roof under the provlSlons of SectIOn 2- 803 B Tounst (T) Dlstnct, Resort FacilIties HIgh (RFH) Category o 148 acres, 6,479 square feet Current Use Apartments (8 UnIts) Proposed Use Multl-fdmtly reSldenllal (4 Units) North West Tounst Dlstnct (T), Overnight accommodations Tounst Dlstnct (T), OvernIght accommodatIons and attached dweIlmgs Clearwater Harbor and Tounst Dlstnct (T), Clearwater Hat ber Tounst DIstnct (T), Attached dwellings East South CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY: Scemc nOlth-south beach comdor, overnight lodgmg, multi-family residential, and commelclal StOll I Report - Commumty Developmenl Board - September 2 [ 2004 - Case FLD2004-030 18 - Page I I, ,. .,.I UPDATE: At the July 20, 2004 Community Development Board (COB) meetmg, a motion to approve thIs case faIled by a vole of 2-3 and the case was automdtlcally contmued to August This Cdse was contInued from the August 17, 2004 meetIng because of new plans submitted by the apphcant The staff report has been updated accordIngly The revlSlons Include a reductIOn m the front setback was changed from SIX feet (to pavement) to 5 69 feet (to pavement), a reductIOn 10 the side (south) setback was changed from zero feet (to wooden walkway) to four feet (to extenor stUlrs), a reduction m the side (north) setback was changed from eight feet (to buIidmg) to 672 feet (to bulldmg) (the section of the bUIldmg hOUSIng the dumpster now opens to the outsIde) and the ImpervIOUS surface ration was reduced from 0 75 to 0 70 ANAL YSIS: Site LocatIon and EXlstmg Conditions: ThIs 0 148-acre sIte IS located on the east sIde of Bay Esplanade, apploxlffiJtely 300 feet south of Somerset Street OvernIght accommodations and attached dwellmgs dominate the Immediate vlclmty to the west, south, and north By Code, the allowable denSIty on thIs site IS fIve hotel UTIlts or four dweIImg umts The site contdms an eXlstmg, smgle-story, elght-umt apartment bUIlding, with back out parkmg on Bay E~planade There IS an eXIstmg deck on the east side of the sIte and an eXlstmg walkway from the front of the site to the rear dlong the south property line The eXlstmg bUlld10g and Its parkmg area fit tightly onto the sIte There IS limited landscapIng There IS one eXIsting dock, located at the east slde of the site, IS plOposed to remam by thIs redevelopment request The site IS located withIn the special area redevelopment plan, Beach by DeHgn, as part of the "Old Flonda" Dlstnct This area hJS been deslgnated for multi-family townhomes and condOm1OlUmS of low to mldnse The Immedl3te V1ClOlty IS almost entIrely composed of attached dwellmgs and small motels BuildIng styles generally resemble archItecture from the 1950's and appear to have been progressively expanded Bay Esplanade, In thiS general VICInIty, IS a local street With no sidewalks where many SItes rely on the public nght-of-way to accommodate perpendicular, back-out parkmg Generally, the streetscape IS In need of redevelopment to I m pi 0 ve pdrkln g, pedes tn an acces s, and I ts des thetJ C appearance Beach by De", 1 g It reco gmzes site constraints of pdrcels m the neighborhood and dIfficultIes of redevelopment Proposal: The proposal IS to completely raze the eXIsting apartments and construct four attached dwellmgs ("Ld Rlsa II") The applicatIOn IS seekIng approval of the use, lot SIze and Width reductIOns, setback reductIons, plus an IOcrease m height The proposal shows SIX on-Site parkmg spaces at ground level The bUlldmg IS proposed to be tour stones above parkIng and reach to 51 83 feet from a FEMA bUIlding lIne to roof mldpomt ThiS sIte IS located wlthm a flood zone (Zone AE) WIth an elevatIOn of 11 feet The bUIlding elevatIOns show four stones WIth a rooftop terrace over parkmg There IS an elevator ovenun tower extending over the roof terrace The deSIgn of the bulldmg mcludes arched styling With some of the doorways and WIndows Large wmdows are show on the edst elevatIOn, With views of Cledrwdter Hatbor The plans show the bUildings to have a beIge color stucco fmlsh With a red-brown color roof Wmdows are ploposed to have alummum framing With a precast stone look tnm The roof IS shown to have a clay tile miSSIOn shape Wrought Iron ralhngs will be attached to walkways and platforms outSIde the building on flve levels The north and west Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 21 2004 - Case FLD2004-030 J 8 - Page 2 ,- elevatIOns show a decorative architectural medallion on the north and west sIdes of the elevator tower Extenor stairs are shown on the north elevatIOn, from the ground level to the roof Vehicular and pedestllan safety would be Improved, as there wlil no longer be any back out park10g onto Bay Esplanade Five cabanas and a rest room are shown on the site plan at the rear of the Site The deck and dock amemty IS proposed to be shared with residents of a residential development across the street to the west, (La Rlsa I) Trash collectIOn IS proposed to be made from a solid wasle dumpster located 10Slde the buildmg at the front (west side) of the site The dumpster IS dllec[\y accessible from a door open1Og to the site entrance from Bay Esplanade WhIle there IS a landscape plan, the proposed setbacks reduce the opportumty for green space A six-foot high opaque fence IS proposed along the south side of the property Preliminary stormwater deSign has been addressed The deSign IS essentially complete Beach by DesIgn does not specifIcally suggest the development as proposed by thiS apphcatlOn Beach by De.\1gn reads In part," the scale and mtenslty of the area, wIth relatively few exceptIOns, IS substantially less than comparable areas to the south" The document contemplates "hmlted new constructIOn where renovation IS not practIcal" What IS proposed IS a substantial 10Clease 10 scale to what eXists wlth10 the Old Flonda Dlstnct The development IS not visually 1Oterest1Og and the mass10g and scale do not comply with the 10tended character of the "Old Flonda Dlstnct" and Beach by De~lgn The apphcatlOn proposes to maXimize the allowable denSIty and IS seekIng seven vanatlOns from the Code to make thiS project work (reductIOns In lot Size, Width, setbacks, and an Increase In bUilding height) The proposed use IS acceptable, but the overall scale IS not compatible with the eXisting surroundmg land uses The proposed reductIOn In lot area will result 10 a bUlld1Og, whlch IS out of scale with eXisting bUIldings 10 the Immediate vlclmty of the parcel proposed for development The proposed 10creased 10 height does not result In an Improved site plan or Improved deSign and appearance The proposed reductions 10 Side setbacks do not result 10 J.n Improved site plan, more efflc..lent parkmg or Improved desIgn and appearance Development of the land, as proposed, will not be In halmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, denSity and character of adJacent propertIes DeSign of the proposed development does not minimiZe Visual adverse Impacts on adjacent propertles CODE ENFORCEMENT ANALYSIS: There dre no outstand1Og enforcement Issues associated with thls slte StJff Repurt - Commumty Development Board - September 2 I 2004 - Case FLD2004-030 18 . Page 3 STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: (Section 2-801.1 and 2-802): STANDARD PROPOSED CONSISTENT ~NCONSISTENT MAXIMUM Four dwellmg umts X DENSITY (maximum of four dwelling units permitted) IMPERVIOUS 07 X SURFACE RA TIO (ISR) (maximum ISR is .95) LOT AREA (10,000 o 148 acres, 6,479 square feet X* square feet is minimum requirement) LOT WIDTH (100 60 feet at nearest pOInt X* feet minimum required) FRONT SETBACK 569 feet at closest pOInt (to X* (35 feet minimum pavement) required) REAR SETBACK (20 10 feet (to deck) X* feet . . nummum requirement) SIDE SETBACK (10 North 672 feet X* feet . . South four feet to extenor staIrs mlDlmurn requirement) HEIGHT (35 - 100 51 83 feet X* feet allowable FLD ranee) PARKING SPACES SIX spaces, 1 5 spaces per umt X (1.5 per unit required) * See analysIs above for dIScussIon Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 2 I, 2004 - Case FLD20Q4-030 18 - Page 4 " . FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA (Section 2-803.B) applicable to lot area and width, building h ht d b k el~1 an set ac s: Consistent InconSIStent 1 The reductIOn m lot area will not result In a bUIlding, which IS out of scale with eXisting bUIldings m the Immediate vlclmty of the parcel [X] proposed for development 2 The use of the palcel proposed for development will not mvolve direct [X] access to an artenal street 3 The Increased height results m an Improved site plan or lmproved [ ] (X] desIgn and dppeJrance 4 The mcreased height IS necessary to allow the lmprovement of off- [X] ( ] street parkmg on the ground floor of the reSidential bUIldmg 5 The reductIOn III side setback does not prevent access to the rear of [ ] [X] any bUIlding by emergency vehicles 6 The reductIOn III side setback results m an Improved site plan, more ( ] [X] efflcJent parkmg or Improved design and appearance GENERAL STANDARDS (Section 3-913): Consistent I ncoru.l...tent 1 Development of the land will be m harmony WIth the scale, bulk, [ ] [X] coverage, densIty and character of adjacent propertles 2 Development WIll not hmder or discourage development and use of [X] [ ] adjacent land and bUlldmgs or significantly Impair the value thereof 3 Development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons [XJ [ ] resldmg or workmg m the neighborhood 4 Development IS designed to minimiZe traffic congestIon [X] [ ] 5 Development IS consIstent with the commumty character of the [ ] [X] ImmedIate VICInIty 6 Design of the proposed development mmlmlzes adverse effects, [ ] [X] including vIsual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation Impacts on adjacent properties StJff Repolt - Commumty Development Board - September 2 I 2004 - Case FLD2004-030] 8 - Page 5 ,- " SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDA TION: The Development Rev]ew Committee reviewed the applicatIOn and supportmg matenals at Its meetings on May 6,2004 and June 10,2004 The PlannIng Department recommends DENIAL of thc FlexIble Development apphcatlOn to develop foUl residential attached dwellmg umts on (1) a 6,479 square foot lot (10,000 square feet IS reqUired), WIth (2) a mmImum lot width of 60 feet (100 feet IS reqUired), seeking (3) a reduction m the front setback from 15 feet to 5 69 feet to pavement, (4) a reductlOTI In the side (south) setback from 10 feet to four teet to extenor stmrs, (5) a reductlOn of the side (no]1h) setback from 10 feet to 672 feet (to bUIldmg), (6) a reductlOn of the rear setback flOm 20 feet to 10 feet to wooden deck, and (7) a bUIldmg height Increase from 35 feet to 51 83 feet from FEMA to roof mldpomt under the provIsions ot SectIon 2-803 B Bases for Demal 1 The proposal does not comply With the FleXible Development cntena per Section 2-803 B 2 The proposal IS not m complIance WIth other standards m the Code mcludlng the General Appl1cabJi]ty Cntena per SectiOn 3-913 3 The development IS not compatible WIth the surroundmg area and will not enhance other redevelopment efforts m the VICinIty of the site location 4 The proposed development IS inCOnsIstent With what ]s proposed within Beach by Deslgn for property Within the Old Flonda Dlstnct Prepared by Planmng Department Staff A IT ACHMENTS Aenal Photograph of Site and Vlclmty location Map Futme Land Use Map ZOlllng Atlas Map Application S \Plarmmg Departmelll\C D B\FLEX\Pendlll/; 'U\('\\Up Jor tire 111')..1 CDlJVJay LIp/allude 669 La Rli>a If (TjlBav EIp/(mude 669 Staff H.eparl for tile September 21 2004 meetmg dor Stat t Report - CommUmLY Development Board - September 21, 2004 - Case FLD2004-030 18 - Page 6 01.' "I (JJf- ;:LOe:tt'tJJf- O..3t!J/d' -flG'I BAy t:SPL.4N.4IJc BOYES, JAMES R BOYES, GEORGIA 969 BRUCE AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1013 COATES I INC 873 ISLAND WAY CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1826 SEIFERT, MICHAEL E SEIFERT, NANCY S 5825 PERSIMMON DR MADISON WI 53711 - 5003 SMITH, MARK A SMITH, CHARLENE S 70 I SAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1409 JOHNSON, ROBERT A EDWARDS, CHRISTIE B 266 ESTEBAN WAY SAN JOSE CA 951 19 - 1515 HAYS, WILLIAM D 661 PO INSETTIA AVE # 304 CLEARWATERFL 33767 -1536 FRANKS, VIRGINIA B 669 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1503 PALMA, GEORGE 32 FORGE DR DOWNSVIEW ON M3N 2R3 00030 - CANADA LEWINSKI, WOJCIECH LEWINSKI, HANNA 661 P0lNSETTIA AVE # 306 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1537 NEIL, MARIE-THERESE 4 RUE DE SA VOlE PARIS 75006 00017- FRANCE HOLDEN, ROBERT L 12 STILLWATER HEIGHTS DR WEST BOYLSTON MA 01583 - 1122 FOLEY, DONALD F FOLEY, CATHERINE G 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 108 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1534 BANNON, MARY K TRE BANNON, PATRICK TRE 910 STRATFORD LN DOWNERS GROVE IL 60516 - 1951 FISHER, BRETT L 699 SAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1506 MEROLI, PETER 967 ELDORADO AVE CLEARWATER BEACH FL 33767 - 1020 JACKSON, LANNY R JACKSON, VICKI J 65 I BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767- CZIPRl, BRENDA K TRE 334 EAST LAKE RD STE 338 PALM HARBOR FL 34685 - 2427 BANNON, PATRICK J TRE! BANNON, MARY K TRE 910 STRATFORD LN DOWNERS GROVE IL 60516 - 1951 MOULIS, JAMES M CIO JUREWICZ, JAN 689 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1503 DE BELLIS, BARBARA 55 SOMERSET ST # 3 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1546 DEAN REAL E'STATE INV INC 647 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1617 LEWINSKl, WOJCIECH LEWINSKI, HANNA 60 SOMERSET # 3 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1543 RHOADS, JEFFREY L TRE PO BOX 861 DUNEDIN FL 34697 - 0861 SNO-BIRD PROP INC 10 PRINCE ST CUMBERLAND CTR ME 04021 - 4007 VERBAN, STEVE VERBAN, HELEN K 55 SOMERSET ST CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1546 LUNDELL, ROBERT LUNDELL, JANE 1989 S ST PAUL ST DENVER CO 80210 - 3533 SERETA, STANLEY D TRE 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 203 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1535 MOLEPSKE, MARK R WALSH, JOHN F CIO HENDERSON, KEITH 19071 F AIRHA V EN EXT SANTA ANA CA 92705- BOERNER, SUSANA B 112 S LAUBER WAY TAMPA FL 33609 - 2615 RADA Y, DAVID M YOUNG, SEAN 2011 CROYDON DR CLEARWATER FL 33764- ... ~ BROWN, TONY S SPEAR, ROBERT E TRE LEWINSKI, HANNA 825 S OSPREY AVE # 308 102 CARRIAGE SQUARE CT LEWINSKI, WOJCIECH SARASOT A FL 34236 - 7807 HENDERSONVILLE NC 28791 - 661 POINSETTA AVE #306 1396 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1537 HENDERSON,AUDREY BEACH & GULF SANDS INC 01 DOMIZlO INVESTMCN 1'S INC 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 303 657 SAY ESPLANADE 9DMILVAN DR CLEAR WATER FL 33767 - 1536 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1515 TORONTO ON M9L 1Z6 00030- CANADA EYLER, CYNTHIA A LONG, MARIAN C SPERELAKlS, NICHOLAS SR HOLDEN, DONNA L 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 104 SPERELAKIS, DOLORES J 554 ADALINE AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1534 12114 PAULMEADOWS DR VANDALIA OH 45377 - 1802 CINCINNATI OH 45249 - 1330 NICHOLAS, JERRY CIUCEVICH, JOSEPH NIMA HOLDINGS INC C/O P APP AS, BETSY 736 BRUCE AVE 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 110 3002 STRAWBERRY RD #OFC CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1418 CLEARWATER FL 33767- PASADENA TX 77502 - 5230 RAUBESON,CRARLESF 01 DOMJZIO INVESTMENTS INC HALGREN, RALPH W PO BOX 367 90 MILVAN DR HALGREN,VELORA LARGO FL 33779 - 0367 TORONTO- ON M91 1Z6 00030- 56 SOMERSET ST CANADA CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1543 MC SWEENEY, GARY W EYLER, DONALD C ALBRECHT, YVETTE MC SWEENEY, CARMEN EYLER, CYNTHIA A 16 ASHENDEN WALK 20942 E GLEN HAVEN CIR 554 ADALINE AVE FARNHAM COMMON BUCKS NORTHVILLE M148167 - 2465 VANDALIA OR 45377 - 1802 SL23UF 00009- UNITED KINGDOM PIOLI, RICHARD T TRE MOSSER, RICHARD S BEARDSLEY, JAMES M PIOLI, ROBERTA B TRE 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 301 15 MAYFAIR LN 750 ISLAND WAY # 402 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1536 BUFFALO NY ]4201 - 1522 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1820 PASQUA, ANDREW HESSELSCHWERDT, BERND J D'ARRIGO, STEPHEN V 320 10TH AVE HESS ElSCHWERDT, 42 LOWELL ST INDIAN ROCKS BEACH FL BERNHARD ARLINGTON MA 02476 - 4131 33785 - 2871 55 SOMERSET ST # 5 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1546 FRANKS, VIRGINIA B COATES I lNC MAVITY, LEON L 669 SAY ESPLANADE 873 ISLAND WAY 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 307 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1503 CLEAR WATER FL 33767 - 1826 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1537 PASQUALE, JACK R TRE PASQUALE, PATRICIA A TRE 1433 NORMAN DR DARIEN IL 6056 I - 4434 SILLASEN, SEAJA YE 11503 BRIARWOOD DR LAKEWOOD CO 80226 - 371 1 FORLINT, DOMENICO G 808 MANDALA Y AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1324 ~ OJ DOMJZJO INVESTMENTS INC FITZGERALD, RONALD KOEGLER, WALTER A 90 MILV AN DR 665 POINSETTIA AVE KOEGLER, JEAN TORONTO ON M91 IZ6 00030- CLEARWATERFL33767- ]530 135 BRIGHTWATERDR CANADA CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2402 JACKSON, LANNY R THURMOND, W]LLlAM H HILDEBRAND, WILLIAM 0 JR JACKSON, VICKI J THURMOND, CAROL H 66 I POINSETTIA AVE # 107 65 I BAY ESPLANADE 643 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARW A TER FL 33767 - 1534 CLEARWATER FL 33767- CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1617 ARMBRUSTER, JOHN PETRAS, JAMES T 0] OOMIZ]O INVESTMENTS INC 661 PO]NSETTlA AVE # 209 31 ISLAND WAY # 1001 90 MILVAN DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1535 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2207 TORONTO ON M9L 126 00030 CANADA SPERELAKlS, NICHOLAS SR ROZENITS, FRED MASTORIDES, NICHOLAS SPERELAKJS, DOLORES J ROZENITS, ANNA MASTORIDES, LACEY 12114 PAULMEADOWS DR 31 ISLAND WAY # 1002 2187 VIOLA DR CINCINNA TJ OH 45249 - 1330 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2207 CLEARW A TER FL 33764 - 3738 CZJPRI, BRENDA K TRE GRASSO, JOSEPH F FIVE PALM CONDO ASSN INC 334 EAST LAKE RD STE 338 GRASSO, OLGA 673 BAY ESPLANADE PALM HARBOR FL 34685 - 2427 30 TURNER ST # 504 CLEARW A TER FL 33767 - 1503 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5258 WICKY, JERRY E KELLY INV & MGMT CORP CAPRI MOTEL CONDO ASSN WICKY, BETTYW PO BOX 3339 55 SOMERSET ST APT 3 231 LAFAYETTE BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 8339 CLEARWATERFL33767 - 1546 OLDSMAR FL 34677 - 3754 YOUNG, SEAN MEROLI, PETER COQUINA APTS INC 673 BAY ESPLANADE # 105 967 ELDORADO AVE 692 BA Y ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767- CLEARWATER BEACH FL 33767 CLEAR WATER FL 33767 - 1500 - 1 020 CZIPRI, BRENDA K TRE KIELMANN, LOTHAR E ROLLINSON, CLINTON F 334 EAST LAKE RD STE 338 KIELMANN, WENDY ROLLINSON, ANN C PALM HARBOR FL 34685 - 2427 35154 LEON ST 275 KNOLLWOOD RD L1VONIA MI 48150 - 2668 MANCHESTER CT 06040 - 2403 FRANKS, VIRGINIA B FERGUSON, MELODIE A D-GEM 669 BAY ESPLANADE PENNOCK, ROBERT M 625 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1503 665 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1617 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1598 Me FADDEN, ARLENE S THOMPSON, MICHAEL S WINCHESTER, GARY MC FADDEN, ROBERT G 1 HOMPSON MARIA WINCHESTER, PAMELA 66 I POINSETTIA AVE #204 BRENDON FEN POND RO IG rHEHM 673 BAY ESPLANADE # 207 NEAR SEVEN OAKS CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1535 KENT TNI5 91E 00003- CLEAR WATER FL 33767 - 1503 GREAT BRITAIN MC KINNEY, CARMELLA C MC KINNEY, GEORGE L 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 210 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1535 MERRITT, GORDON E MERRITT, M SUZANNA 661 POINSETTIA AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767- GEOMAR HOLDlNGS INC 115 ARGYLE KIRKLAND QC H9H 3H9 00030 CANADA WOSCHITZ, EVA TRE 302 POINSETTIA LAND TRUST 10 COURTWOOD PL TORONTO ON M2K lZ9 00030- CANADA Clearwater Neighborhood CoalItIon Doug Williams, President 2544 Fnsco Dr Clearwater, FL 33761 EPIC HOLDINGS SOUTH 139 SA YSIDE DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2502 ALISON, EMMA F 644 BAY ESPLANADE # 2 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1501 LETOURNEAU, WILLIAM T HIRSCH, DEBORA A 395 16TH ST NEWPORT MN 55055 - 1061 SMITH, RUPERT W JR SMITH, IRENE V 661 POINS ETTIA AVE # 106 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1534 KeIth Zayac, P E Robert Flynt 101 PhilIppe Parkway - Ste 205 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 PENTHOUSE SHORES ASSN INC 661 POINSETTIA AVE CLEARWATER FL33767 - 1561 DOM, MARY 65 SOMERSET ST CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1547 JAKSCH, ROBERT W C/O CONLEY, BEA TE 1596 SH IRLEY PL LARGO FL 33770 - 2218 Clearwater Beach AssocIatIOn David MacNamce 827 Mandalay Ave Clearwater, FL 33767 Radcliffe Development Company 2424 Curlew Rd Clearwater, FL 33683 ) ) III J1Jt1lZl~-"4_ G~~~~I\LCI' Fllt......:;,... \11<_\ ~,'UI71"-<<o,.~X_ ",,,,~.,, -._~~';. ,,"';;';',' \ II -~~ ",,'" "_~,.,.' /~/!Il.'" '" lll"""" - - - "_'" "'...... -= ' ~ll ...c;,l === ~4 "''j"":..--=- ~4 -:.17.&...- ,.'t'..''-:\ -,,; rli/.~"'v.'\i',\\ "'~~)1TE~'d,lt ~.j[:JlS' CITY OF CLEARWATER loNG RANCF PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REvIEW PlANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATIoR, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICiPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTIE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONF (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 October 22,2004 Mr Keith Zayak KeIth Zayak & AssOcIates, Inc 101 PhilIppe Parkway Safety Harbor, Flonda 34695 RE Development Order- Case FLD2004-03018 - 669 Bay Esplanade Dear Mr_ Zayak. ThIS letter constItutes a Development Order pursuant to SectIon 4-206D 6 of the Commumty Development Code On October 19, 2004, the Commumty Development Board revIewed your FleXIble Development applIcatIOn to penrut attached dwellIngs wIth (1) a reductIon of the rmmmum lot area from 10,000 square feet to 6,479 square feet; (2) a reductIon of nummum lot wIdth from 100 feet to 60 feet, (3) a reductIon of the front setback from 15 feet to 5.69 feet (to pavement), (4) a reductIOn of the side (south) setback from 10 feet to four feet to extenor staIrs, (5) a reductIon of the sIde (north) setback from 10 feet to 672 feet (to bUlldmg), (6) a reductIon of the rear setback from 20 feet to 10 feet (to wooden deck), and (7) a bUIldmg heIght mcrease from 35 feet to 51 83 feet from FEMA to rmdpomt of the roof under the proVIsIOns of SectIon 2- 803 B for the site at 669 Bay Esplanade Based on the applIcatIOn and the Staff recommendation, the Commumty Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the applIcatIOn With the followmg conditIons: ConditIons of Approval 1 That the fInal design and color of the bUlldmg be conSistent WIth the conceptual elevatIOns subrmtted to, or as mollifIed by, the CDB, 2 That boats moored at the eXIstIng and any future docks be for the exclusIve use by the resIdents and/or guests of the condOmInIums, 3 That all sIgnage meet Code and be archttecturally-mtegrated mto the deSIgn of the SIte and bUIldmg, 4 That there be no Jet ski or other like watercraft rental busmesses at thIS locatIOn; 5 That the SWFWMD permit or letter of exceptIOn be provIded to Plannmg staff pnor to any bUlldmg penrut Issuance, 6 That a revIsed landscape plan be subrrutted to the satIsfactIOn of PlannIng staff, pnor to any bUlldmg penrut Issuance, 7 That a revised tree survey be subrmtted to the satIsfactIOn of Plannmg staff, pnor to any bUlldmg penrut Issuance, BRIN'! J AUNGST, MA YO~ COMMI~<;IONfP lioYl HM'1II10N, VIO IV1J1yo~"COMMI~<;IONf~ WHITNl Y GRAY, CO\jW""IO~lll FRAAK I-IllJllJlRf"l, COMMI'>'>IONl R @ Bill JON:'Ol'<, CO"I\I[,> ,1m I j( "EQUAl EMPI OYMfNT AND AlllRMAllVI ACIION h1PI OYfR" ') ') October 22,2004 Keith Zayak, Page Two 8 That the fIre servIce pipelIne InstallatIon be addressed to the satIsfactIOn of EngIneenng staff, pnor to bmldIng penrut Issuance, 9 That Open Space, Recreatton Land and RecreatIOn FacIlIty Impact fees be satIsfted pnor to the Issuance of bmldmg penruts or fmal plat, whichever occurs first, 10 That all FIre Department reqUIrements be addressed pnor to bmldmg penrut Issuance, 11 That all proposed utilItIes (from the nghts-of-way to the proposed bUIldmgs) be placed underground and InstallatIon of condUIt(s) along the entIre length of the SIte's street frontages be completed pnor to the Issuance of the first certificate of occupancy, 12 That TraffIc Impact Fees be detennmed and paId pnor to CertIficate of Occupancy Issuance; 13 That the condomInIum plat be recorded WIth Pmellas County pnor to the fIrst CertifIcate of Occupancy, and 14 That the applIcant Install a sIx-foot bnck wall along the south property Ime, consIstent WIth the revIsed SIte plan, so as to redIrect pedestnan traffic onto the adJacent southern property. Pursuant to SectlOn 4-407, an applicatIOn for a bUIldmg penrnt shall be made wIthm one year of FleXIble Development approval (by October 19, 2005) All reqwred certifIcates of occupancy shall be obtaIned wlthm one year of the date of Issuance of the bUIldmg penrut Time frames do not change WIth successIve owners. The Commumty Development Coordmator may grant an extenSIOn of tIme for a penod not to exceed one year and only wlthm the angInal penod of validity The Commumty Development Board may approve one addlttonal extenSIOn of tIme after the Corpmumty Development Coordmator's extensIOn to InItIate a bwldIng permIt applIcatIOn. The Issuance of thIS Development Order does not relIeve you of the neceSSIty to obtam any bUildIng penruts or pay any Impact fees that may be reqUired In order to faclhtate the Issuance of any penmt or lIcense affected by thIS approval, please bnng a copy of thIS letter With you when applYIng for any permIts or lIcenses that reqUIre thIS pnor development approval AddltlOnally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (FlexIble Development) may be Initiated pursuant to SectIon 4-502.B by the applIcant or by any person granted party status WithIn 14 days of the date of the Commumty Development Board meetmg. The filIng of an applIcatIOn/notIce of appeal shall stay the effect of the deCISIOn pendIng the fInal determInatIOn of the case The appeal penod for your case expIres on November 2,2004 If you have any questIons, please do not heSItate to call MIchael H Reynolds, AICP, Planner ill, at 727-562-4836 You can access zomng mfonnatIon for parcels wlthm the City through our webslte www clearwater-fl com ) ~) ) i' I October 22,2004 KeIth Zayak, Page Three SIncerely, ~~ CynthIa H Tarapam, AICP PlannIng DIfector 5 \Plannmg Deparlmen^C 0 1J\FLEX\1nactlve or FmlShed AppllC'allons\Bay Esplanade 669 La Rt 10 II (T) 10 1904 COB - ApprovedllJay Esplanade 669 Developmem Order Oerober 22,2004 doe J I '....-: jUllI1ITD"" ~1'ft..r-l\LoF r#..;r..,. \~.j. ~l:P,....... 67r- \~~.~~ ~-?/i~ ~"~" I ~.~.......... q~",~ ,\ 1/ i \ ~ ~ t!~~:::- -_-' '<"l "r::~ ~-- ,''i Q"l ~~\ ~ _~ i< ~: ':.~"'-~- ,,~~\ .o:..~~~ l' '\ "'-.0:. !f.....m""'Y,'\)..\ ..........}lTH\,.". 8""611'" CITY OF CLEARWATER LONG RA.NGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT RJ:VlEW PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATFR, FlORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIP>J. SFRVlCF~ BUILD1NG, 100 SOU1 H MYRl1 E AVFN!.JE, CLEARWATER, F! ORID.;, 33756 Tcil.PHONr. (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 October 22, 2004 Mr KeIth Zayak KeIth Zayak & Associates, Inc 101 PhilIppe Parkway Safety Harbor, FIonda 34695 RE Development Order- Case FLD2004-030l8 - 669 Bay Esplanade Dear Mr Zayak ThIS letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206D 6 of the Commumty Development Code On October 19, 2004, the Commumty Development Board reviewed your Flexible Development applIcatiOn to permIt attached dwelhngs wIth (1) a reductIOn of the mtnImum lot area from 10,000 square feet to 6,479 square feet, (2) a reduction of mImmum lot Width from 100 feet to 60 feet, (3) a reductIOn of the front setback from 15 feet to 5 69 feet (to pavement), (4) a reductIOn of the SIde (south) setback from 10 feet to four feet to extenor stairs, (5) a reductIon of the SIde (north) setback from 10 feet to 672 feet (to bmldmg), (6) a reduction of the rear setback from 20 feet to 10 feet (to wooden deck); and (7) a bUlldmg height mcrease from 35 feet to 51 83 feet from FEMA to rmdpoInt of the roof under the provIsiOns of SectIOn 2- 803 B. for the site at 669 Bay Esplanade Based on the applIcatIOn and the Staff recommendatIOn, the Commumty Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the apphcatton With the followmg condttlons ConditIOns of Approval I That the fmal deSIgn and color of the bUlldmg be conSIstent With the conceptual elevattons submttted to, or as modified by, the CDB, 2 That boats moored at the eXlstmg and any future docks be for the exclUSIve use by the reSIdents and/or guests of the condommlUms, 3 That all sIgnage meet Code and be archttecturally-mtegrated mto the deSIgn of the site and bUIldmg, 4 That there be no Jet skI or other lIke watercraft rental bUSInesses at thIS locatIon, 5 That the SWFWMD permit or letter of exception be proVIded to Plannmg staff poor to any bmldIng penmt Issuance; 6 That a revised landscape plan be submItted to the satisfactIOn of PlannIng staff, pnor to any bUIldIng penmt Issuance, 7 That a revised tree survey be subrmtted to the satIsfactIOn of Planmng staff, poor to any bUlldmg permIt Issuance, BRlAN J AUNGST, MWOR COMMlYilONFR HoYT HAMIl lON, VleF M,WOR"CO~Ht]~~IONFR WHITNEY GR~Y, CO\.tMIS~lOMR rRANK HIBIlARD, GOMMIO~IONER * Bill JONSON, CO\I,\ll~~IO,\1 R "FQUAI EMPI QYMFNT AND Art lRM.;,11Vl Ac.nON FMPI OYTR' :\ f\ , October 22,2004 Keith Zayak, Page Two 8 That the fIre serVIce pIpelIne mstallatlOn be addressed to the satIsfactIOn of Englneenng staff, pnor to bUIldmg permit Issuance, 9 That Open Space, Recreation Land and RecreatIOn FacIlIty Impact fees be satIsfIed pnor to the Issuance of bUlldmg penruts or fInal plat, whIchever occurs fIrst, 10. That all FIre Department reqUIrements be addressed pnor to bUIldIng penrut Issuance, 11 That all proposed utIlIties (from the nghts-of-way to the proposed bUlldmgs) be placed underground and InstallatIOn of condUlt(s) along the entire length of the slte's street frontages be completed pnor to the Issuance of the fIrst certIficate of occupancy, 12 That Traffic Impact Fees be deternnned and patd poor to Certificate of Occupancy Issuance, 13. That the condorrunIum plat be recorded WIth Pmellas County pnor to the first CertIficate of Occupancy; and ~ 14 That the applIcant Install a sIx-foot bnck wall along the south property lIne, conSistent WIth the revlsed SIte plan, so as to redirect pedestnan traffIC onto the adJacent southern property Pursuant to SectIon 4-407, an applIcatIOn for a bUlldmg permit shall be made wlthm one year of FlexIble Development approval (by October 19, 2005) All reqUIred certifIcates of occupancy shall be obtamed wlthm one year of the date of Issuance of the bUIldmg pefmIt Time frames do not change WIth succeSSIve owners_ The CommunIty Development Coordmator may grant an extenslOn of tIme for a penod not to exceed one year and only wIthm the ongmal penod of valIdity. The CommunIty Development Board may approve one addItlOnal extensIOn of time after the CommunIty Development Coordmator's extensIOn to mItIate a bUlldmg permIt applIcation The Issuance of thiS Development Order does not relIeve you of the necessity to obtam any bUIldmg pefmIts or pay any Impact fees that may be reqUIred In order to facIlItate the Issuance of any pefmIt or hcense affected by thiS approval, please bong a copy of thiS letter WIth you when applymg for any pefmIts or lIcenses that reqUIre thIS pnor development approval AdditIOnally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (FleXIble Development) may be ImtIated pursuant to SectIOn 4-502 B by the applIcant or by any person granted party status wlthm 14 days of the date of the Commumty Development Board meetmg. The filIng of an applIcatIOn/nOtiCe of appeal shall stay the effect of the deCISIOn pendmg the final deternnnatlOn of the case The appeal penod for your case expIres on November 2, 2004. If you have any questIons, please do not heSItate to call MIchael H Reynolds, AICP, Planner ill, at 727-562-4836 You can access zonIng mformatton for parcels wlthm the CIty through our webslte www clearwater-fl com. \ \ , , October 22, 2004 Keith Zayak, Page Three Smcerely, ~~ Cynthia H Tarapam, AICP Plannmg Duector 5 \Planmng Departmen^C D 8\FLEJNnacllVe or FinIshed AppltcatlOns\Bay Esplanade 669 La RlSa II (T) 10 19 04 COB - ApprovetN3ay . Esplanade 669 Develop"umt Order October 22, 2004 doc , , , \, {lifJ/1ITQ.8,#.... t~~~~ ~LCF FlitA.... ,~..j, ~~'''''II... i,7~"" \\~t.~J ............_';,L.~ .."'~~' II, -~~":. <>~ .._~\........... /wr1-:..".... ~I!::"':J~-=- " ~~ ...~":. ~-=- , ~q ':. ,-,,":._ --=-- . n;;;: '" ~yA\..o:-........~ .,l~ r-....'--...' ~r.JP.IIIW" '<i:~,\ .............J1THtil/.'. "'JlI1' CITY OF CLEARWATER LONG RA."<GE PlAl.'1NING DEVf.l.OPMFNT Rl:v!f."W PlA.NNING DEPARTMENT POST OFllCE Box 4748, CI r.ARWATER, FlORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAl SERV!CI:S BUnniNG, 100 Soum MYRTLE AvI:.NUE, CLEARWAT[R, FlORIDA 33756 TFLFPHO'l[ (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 October 22, 2004 Mr KeIth Zayak KeIth Zayak & AssocIates, Inc 101 PhilIppe Parkway Safety Harbor, Honda 34695 RE Development Order - Case FLD2004-030 18 - 669 Bay Esplanade Dear Mr Zayak ThIS letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to SectIOn 4-206D 6 of the Commumty Development Code On October 19, 2004, the Commumty Development Board revIewed your FlexIble Development applIcatIOn to penrut attached dwelhngs wIth (1) a reductIon of the mmlmum lot area from 10,000 square feet to 6,479 square feet, (2) a reductIOn of mmImum lot wIdth from 100 feet to 60 feet; (3) a reductIOn of the front setback from 15 feet to 5 69 feet (to pavement); (4) a reductIon of the sIde (south) setback from 10 feet to four feet to extenor stairs; (5) a reductIOn of the side (north) setback from 10 feet to 6 72 feet (to buIldmg), (6) a reductIon of the rear setback from 20 feet to 10 feet (to wooden deck), and (7) a bUIldmg height mcrease from 35 feet to 51 83 feet from FEMA to ll1ldpomt of the roof under the provISIons of SectIon 2- 803 B for the site at 669 Bay Esplanade Based on the applIcatIon and the Staff recommendation, the Commumty Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the applicatIOn wIth the followmg conditions CondItIons of Approval' 1 That the fInal desIgn and color of the bUIldmg be conSIstent WIth the conceptual elevattons submttted to, or as modIfied by, the CDB, 2 That boats moored at the eXIsting and any future docks be for the exclusive use by the resIdents and/or guests of the condominIUms, 3 That all slgnage meet Code and be archltecturally-mtegrated mto the deSign of the sIte and bUIldmg, 4 That there be no Jet ski or other ltke watercraft rental busmesses at thIS locatIOn, 5 That the SWFWMD penrut or letter of exception be prOVided to Plannmg staff pnor to any bUIldmg permIt Issuance, 6 That a reVIsed landscape plan be submrtted to the satIsfactIOn of Plannmg staff, pnor to any bmldmg permIt Issuance, 7 That a reVised tree survey be submItted to the satisfactIOn of Planmng staff, pnor to any bUlldmg permIt Issuance, BRlMJ J AUNG>T, MAYOR COMMIS~ION[R HoYT HA.\111101'>, VleF MAYOR COM>.1I~~IONrR W~lITNEY GRAY, CO'v[MIS~IOHR FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONFR * Bill JONSON, CO\IW~\IONrR , EQUAl FMPI OYM]. N r AND At t IRMA llVI ACnON FM PI Q)TR" , October 22, 2004 Keith Zayak, Page Two 8 That the fIre servIce pIpelme mstallation be addressed to the satisfactIOn of Engmeenng staff, pnor to bUIldmg penmt Issuance, 9 That Open Space, RecreatIOn Land and Recreation FacIlIty Impact fees be satIsfIed pnor to the Issuance of bUildIng permits or final plat, whichever occurs first, 10. That all FIfe Department reqUirements be addressed pnor to bUIldmg pernut Issuance, 11 That all proposed utilItIes (from the nghts-of-way to the proposed bUIldmgs) be placed underground and InstallatIOn of condUIt(s) along the entIre length of the sIte's street frontages be completed pnor to the Issuance of the first certIficate of occupancy, 12 That TraffIc Impact Fees be deternuned and paId pnor to CertIficate of Occupancy Issuance, 13. That the condonnmum plat be recorded with PlneIlas County pnor to the fIrst CertIfIcate of Occupancy,and 14 That the applIcant mstall a sIx-foot bnck wall along the south property hne, consistent with the revIsed sIte plan, so as to redIrect pedestnan traffIc onto the adJacent southern property. Pursuant to SectIOn 4-407, an applIcatIOn for a bUlldmg pernut shall be made wlthm one year of FlexIble Development approval (by October 19, 2005) All requlfed certificates of occupancy shall be obtaIned wlthm one year of the date of Issuance of the bUildIng pernut TIme frames do not change wIth succeSSIve owners. The Commumty Development Coordmator may grant an extensIOn of tIme for a penod not to exceed one year and only wlthm the ongmal penod of valIdity The CommunIty Development Board may approve one additIOnal extensIOn of tIme after the Commumty Development Coordmator's extensIOn to ImtIate a bUildIng peront applIcatIon The Issuance of thIS Development Order does not relIeve you of the necessity to obtam any bUlldmg permIts or pay any Impact fees that may be requIred In order to facIlItate the Issuance of any penrut or lIcense affected by this approval, please bnng a copy of thiS letter WIth you when applymg for any peronts or hcenses that reqUIre this pnor development approval AddItionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (FleXIble Development) may be mmated pursuant to Section 4-502 B by the apphcant or by any person granted party status wlthm 14 days of the date of the Commumty Development Board meetmg The fIlmg of an applIcatIOn/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the deCISIon pendmg the fInal deternunatIOn of the case The appeal penod for your case expIres on November 2,2004. If you have any questIOns, please do not heSItate to call MIchael H Reynolds, AICP, Planner ill, at 727-562-4836 You can access zOnIng mformatIon for parcels wIthm the CIty through our webslte www clearwater-fl com jl , October 22, 2004 KeIth Zayak, Page Three Smcerely, ~~;t/ Cynthia H Tarapam, AICP PlannIng Director 5 \Plannmg Departmen^C 0 H\FLEXVnocllve or FlIltshed AppllcatlOns\Bay Esplanade 669 La RISa II (T) 10 19 04 COB - ApprovedlBay Esplanade 669 Development Order October 22, 2004 doc .) 11 , , fUl1l1fTO"-,, , ~ ~~f.\.~~LOF riff;;'" ....\Q~ ~jl{""''''''''''~ct~..I~_ ~..,,~... ............... Il-~.. I #ff- '" "Q.' ~\ I, ,~!i\ ':, ill~--" J-' ",c=a. -.= " -=s:: ..~;. -===-..~ ,.!;':tq "\P ~ - -~~ L\:"~ ':.~~"O._-==- ",~~\ ... ..,......-~.1 \- ~ 'Ir.~~~m" '<(~." ..........)lTEl""f. #'.8/111 CITY OF CLEARWATER LONG RA.f\JGI: PLANNING DEVELOI'MFNT RJ:vIEW PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, ClEARWATER, FlORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SJo.RVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUlH MYRnE AVJo.NUE, ClEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TnrpJ-lONC (727) 562.4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 October 22, 2004 Mr Keith Zayak Keith Zayak & ASSOCIates, Inc 101 PhilIppe Parkway Safety Harbor, Flonda 34695 RE Development Order - Case FLD2004-03018 - 669 Bay Esplanade Dear Mr. Zayak ThIS letter constItutes a Development Order pursuant to SectIon 4-206D 6 of the Commumty Development Code On October 19, 2004, the CommunIty Development Board revIewed your FlexIble Development applIcatIon to permIt attached dwellIngs WIth (1) a reductIOn of the mImmum lot area from 10,000 square feet to 6,479 square feet, (2) a reductIOn of mmlmum lot width from 100 feet to 60 feet, (3) a reductIOn of the front setback from 15 feet to 569 feet (to pavement), (4) a reductIOn of the SIde (south) setback from 10 feet to four feet to extenor stairs; (5) a reduction of the slde (north) setback from 10 feet to 6.72 feet (to bUIldmg), (6) a reduction of the rear setback from 20 feet to 10 feet (to wooden deck), and (7) a bUIldIng heIght mcrease from 35 feet to 51 83 feet from FEMA to mIdpomt of the roof under the provISIOns of SectIOn 2- 803 B. for the SIte at 669 Bay Esplanade Based on the apphcatlOn and the Staff recommendatIon, the Commumty Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the applIcatIon wIth the followmg conditIons Conditions of Approval 1 That the fInal desIgn and color of the bUIldIng be consistent with the conceptual elevatIOns submItted to, or as modifIed by, the CDB, 2 That boats moored at the eXIstmg and any future docks be for the exclUSive use by the resIdents and/or guests of the condomImums, 3 That all slgnage meet Code and be architecturallY-Integrated Into the deSign of the SIte and bUIldmg, 4 That there be no Jet ski or other lIke watercraft rental busmesses at thIS location; 5 That the SWFWMD permIt or letter of exception be provIded to Plannmg staff pnor to any bUIldmg permIt Issuance, 6 That a reVIsed landscape plan be submItted to the satisfactIOn of Planmng staff, pnor to any bUIldmg permIt Issuance; 7 That a reYlsed tree survey be subrrutted to the satisfactIon of Planmng staff, pnor to any bUIldmg permIt Issuance, BRI^," J AUNGS f, MAYOR COW.lI~'.,]ONLR HOYf HilMl1 TON, V](.F MArOR-COM"1I~~IONFR WliIfN[Y GR~Y, CO\1\t1S~IOf',rR FR/>J'<K HlBlJilRD, COMMI~~]ON[R * Bill JONSON, COIIW."lm I R "EQUAl FMPI OYMFNT Ai'lD All IRMA,l IV! Ac TIO'\J FMPI O'rTR" ;\ 1 I October 22, 2004 KeIth Zayak, Page Two 8 That the fIre servIce plpehne mstallation be addressed to the satisfaction of EngIneenng staff, pnor to bUIldIng permIt Issuance, 9 That Open Space, Recreation Land and RecreatIOn FacIlIty Impact fees be sahsfIed pnor to the Issuance of bUIldmg permIts or fmal plat, whIchever occurs fIrst, 10. That all FIre Department reqUIrements be addressed pnor to bUIldIng permIt Issuance, 11 That all proposed utlhttes (from the nghts-of-way to the proposed bUIldmgs) be placed underground and mstallatlon of condmt(s) along the entire length ofthe sIte's street frontages be completed pnor to the Issuance of the first certificate of occupancy, 12 That TraffIc Impact Fees be determIned and paId pnor to Certificate of Occupancy Issuance, 13 That the condommlUm plat be recorded WIth Pmellas County pnor to the fIrst CertIficate of Occupancy; and 14 That the applIcant mstall a sIx-foot bnck wall along the south property lIne, consistent wIth the revIsed SIte plan, so as to redIrect pedestnan traffiC onto the adJacent southern property Pursuant to SectIOn 4-407, an applIcatIOn for a bUIldmg penrut shall be made wlthm one year of FleXible Development approval (by October 19, 2005) All requIred certIficates of occupancy shall be obtaIned wIthm one year of the date of Issuance of the bUlldmg pefmIt Time frames do not change With successive owners The CommunIty Development CoordInator may grant an extensIOn of time for a penod not to exceed one year and only wIthm the ongmal penod of valIdlty_ The Commumty Development Board may approve one additIonal extensIOn of time after the Commumty Development Coordmator's extensIOn to InItlate a bUlldmg permIt apphcatIon The Issuance of thIS Development Order does not reheve you of the necessIty to obtam any bUIldmg pernuts or pay any Impact fees that may be reqUIred In order to facIlItate the Issuance of any permit or lIcense affected by thiS approval, please bnng a copy of thIS letter WIth you when applymg for any permIts or hcenses that reqUIre thiS pnor development approval Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexlble Development) may be mlt1ated pursuant to Section 4-502 B by the applIcant or by any person granted party status wIthm 14 days of the date of the CommunIty Development Board meetmg The filIng of an applIcatIOn/notIce of appeal shall stay the effect of the deCISIOn pendmg the fInal determmation of the case The appeal penod for your case expIres on November 2,2004 If you have any questIOns, please do not heSItate to call MIchael H Reynolds, AICP, Planner ill, at 727-562-4836. You can access zonmg mformatlOn for parcels wIthm the City through our webslte www clearwater-fl com I I' I October 22, 2004 Kel th Zayak, Page Three Smcerely, ~~ Cynthia H Tarapam, AICP Planmng DIrector 5 \Planning Department\C 0 lJIFLEXVnacllVe or Fmlshed AppllcallOnNJay Elplonode 669 La Rtsa II (T) 10 1904 COB - ApprovecNJay Esplanade 669 Development Order Ortober 22,2004 doc CDB Meetmg Date Case Number Agenda Item' Applicant Address August 17, 2004 FLD2004-030 18 El Radchffe Development Company. LLC 669 Bay Esplanade ALTERNA TE APPROVAL CONDITIONS The followmg are potentIal conditiOns that may be Imposed should the applIcatIOn be approved ConditiOns of Approval. 1 That the sIte plan be revised to remove the walkway proposed along the south sIde of the site, pnor to bUIldmg permit Issuance, 2 That the fmal deSign and color of the bUIldmg be conSistent WIth the conceptual elevatIOns submitted to, or as modifIed by, the CDB, 3 That boats moored at the eXistIng and any future docks be for the exclusIve use by the reSIdents and/or guests of the condomInIUms, 4 That all slgnage meet Code and be archltecturally-mtegrated mto the deSign of the sIte and bUIldmg, 5 That there be no Jet skI or other lIke watercraft rental busmesses at thIS locatIOn, 6 That the SWFWMD permtt or letter of exceptIon be provided to Planmng staff pnor to any buddmg penmt Issuance, 7 That a revIsed landscape plan be submitted to the satIsfactIOn of Plannmg staff, pnor to any bUIldmg permit Issuance, 8 That a revised tree survey be submItted to the satIsfaction of Plannmg staff, pnor to any bUIldIng permit Issuance, 9 That the fIre serVIce plpelme InstallatIon be addressed to the satisfactIOn of Engmeenng staff, pnor to bmldmg permIt Issuance, 10 That Open Space, Recreation Land and RecreatIon Facility Impact fees be sansfled pnor to the Issuance of bUlldmg permIts or fmal plat, whichever occurs fIrst, 11 That all Fire Department reqUIrements be addressed pnor to bUildIng permIt Issuance, 12 That all proposed utIlIties (from the nghts-of-way to the proposed bUIldmgs) be placed underground and mstallatlOn of condmt(s) along the entIre length of the site's street frontages be completed pnor to the Issuance of the first certIficate of occupancy, 13 That TraffiC Impact Fees be determIned and paId pnor to Certificate of Occupancy Issuance, 14 That the condomInIUm plat be recorded With Pmellas County pnor to the first CertIficate of Occupancy, and 15 That the fIre service plpelme be Installed by the contractor and the tapping sleeve/valve and backflow prevent or/meter be Installed by the City at the applIcant's expense, pnor to the first CertIficate of Occupancy 5 \Planmng Departmen^C 0 B\FLEX\Pendmg easei\Up for the next CDl!\Bay Elplannde 669 La Rrsa II (T]lBay EiJplanade 669 Alternate Summary and RecommendatIOn due r' ~ ORIGINAL COB Meeting Date Cd~e Number Agenda Item Apphcant Address. September 21, 2004 FLD2004-030 18 E2 Radchffe Development Company. LLC 669 Bay Esplanade CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: FlexIble Development approval to permIt attached dwellIngs wIth (1) a reductlon of the mmlmum lot area from 10,000 square feet to 6,479 square feet, (2) a reductIOn of mInImUm lot width from 100 feet to 60 feet, (3) a reductIon of the front setback from 1 ~ f~et to S 69 feet (to pavement); (4) a reductIOn of the sIde (south) setback ... from 10 feet to four feet to extenor staIrs, (5) a reductIon of the Side (north) setback from 10 feet to 6 72 _ feet (to bUlldmg), (6) a reduction of the rear setback from 20 feet to 10 feet (to wooden deck), and (7) a bUlldmg height mcrease from 3S feet to 51 83 feet from FEMA to mldpomt of the roof under the provIsIOns of Sectlon 2- 803 B ~;'#~OqI'Af if "w.e/ll':q "",,~ ~ EXISTING ZONING! LAND USE: Tounst (T) Dlstnct, Resort FacIhtles High (RFH) Category PROPERTY SIZE: o 148 acres; 6,479 square feet PROPERTY USE: Current Use. Apartments (8 UnIts) Proposed Use Multt-famIly resldenttal (4 UnIts) ADJACENT ZONINGI LAND USES: North Tounst Dlstnct (T), Overmght accommodations West Tounst DIstnct (T), Overnight accommodatIOnS and attached dwellings East. Clearwater Harbor and Tounst Dlstnct (T), Clearwater Harbor South Tounst DIstnct (T), Attached dwellmgs CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY: ScenIC north-south beach comdor, overnIght lodgmg, multI-farmly reSIdential, and commerclal Staff Report _ Commumty Development Board - September 21 2004 - Case FLD2004-030 18 - Page I UPDA TE: At the July 20, 2004 Commumty Development Board (CDB) meetmg, a motIOn to approve thIS case fatled by a vote of 2-3 and the case was automatically contmued to August ThIs case was continued from the August 17, 2004 meetmg because of new plans submitted by the apphcant The staff report has been updated accordmgly The reVISIons Include a reduction m the front setback was changed from SIX feet (to pavement) to 5 69 feet (to pavement), a reductlOn to the slde (south) setback was changed from zero feet (to wooden walkway) to four feet (to extenor staIrs), a reductIOn In the slde (north) setback was changed from eIght feet (to bUlldmg) to 672 feet (to bUildIng) (the sectlOn of the bUlldmg hOUSIng the dumpster now opens to the outsIde) and the ImperviOus surface ration was reduced from 0 75 to 0 70 ANAL YSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: ThIS 0 l48-acre site IS located on the east sIde of Bay Esplanade, approximately 300 feet south of Somerset Street Overmght accommodatIons and attached dwellIngs dominate the Immediate vlclmty to the west, south, and north By Code, the allowable denSIty on thIS sIte IS five hotel umts or four dwelling umts The site contams an eXlstmg, smgle-story, eIght-umt apartment bUIldmg, with back out parkIng on Bay Esplanade There IS an eXIstIng deck on the east sIde of the site and an eXlstmg walkway from the front of the site to the rear along the south property lme The eXistIng bUIldIng and ItS parkIng area fIt tightly onto the SIte There IS lImited landscapmg There IS one eXlstmg dock, located at the east side of the SIte, IS proposed to remam by thIS redevelopment request The sIte IS located withIn the specIal area redevelopment plan, Beach by Deslgn, as part of the "Old Flonda" Dlstnct ThiS area has been deSIgnated for multI-famIly townhomes and condomInIUms of low to mldnse The ImmedIate VICInity IS almost entlfely composed of attached dwellings and small motels. BUIlding styles generally resemble archItecture from the 1950's and appear to have been progressively expanded Bay Esplanade, to thiS general VICInIty, IS a local street with no sIdewalks where many sites rely on the publIc nght-of-way to accommodate perpendIcular, back-out parkIng Generally, the streetscape IS m need of redevelopment to Improve parking, pedestnan access, and ItS aesthetIC appearance Beach by Deslgn recognIzes SIte constramts of parcels In the neighborhood and dIfficultIes of redevelopment. Proposal: The proposal IS to completely raze the eXlstmg apartments and construct four attached dwellIngs ("La Rlsa II") The applIcation IS seekIng approval of the use, lot size and Width leductlOns, setback reductions, plus an Increase m height. The proposal shows SIX on-Site parlang spaces at ground level The bUIldmg IS proposed to be four stones above parkmg and reach to 51 83 feet from a FEMA bUIldIng lIne to roof midpOInt ThiS SIte IS located wlthm a flood zone (Zone AE) with an elevatIon of 11 feet The bmldmg elevatIOns show four stones wIth a rooftop terrace over parkmg There IS an elevator overrun tower extendmg over the roof terrace The deSign of the bUIldIng mcludes arched styling with some of the doorways and wmdows. Large wmdows are show on the east elevatIOn, WIth VIews of Clearwater Harbor The plans show the bUildIngs to have a beIge color stucco fimsh With a red-brown color roof, Wmdows are proposed to have alummum frammg WIth a precast stone look tnm The roof IS shown to have a clay tIle miSSIon shape Wrought Iron raIlIngs WIll be attached to walkways and platforms outside the bulldmg on five levels The north and west Slaff Report - Commumty Development Board - September 21, 2004 - Case FLD2004-030 18 - Page 2 elevatIOns show a decorative archItectural medalhon on the north and west sides of the elevator tower Extenor stairs are shown on the north elevatIOn, from the ground level to the roof Vehicular and pedestnan safety would be Improved, as there wIll no longer be any back out parkIng onto Bay Esplanade Five cabanas and a rest room are shown on the site plan at the rear of the site The deck and dock amemty IS proposed to be shared WIth resIdents of a reSidential development across the street to the west, (La Rlsa I). Trash collection IS proposed to be made from a sohd waste dumpster located mSlde the bUIldmg at the front (west side) of the SIte The dumpster IS directly accessible from a door opemng to the site entrance from Bay Esplanade While there IS a landscape plan, the proposed setbacks reduce the opportumty for green space A six-foot high opaque fence IS proposed along the south side of the property PrelimInary stormwater design has been addressed The design IS essentIally complete Beach by DeSign does not specIfically suggest the development as proposed by thIS applicatIOn Beach by Destgn reads m part, " . the scale and mtenslty of the area, WIth relatively few exceptIons, IS substantially less than comparable areas to the south" The document contemplates "lImited new constructIOn where renovatIOn IS not practical" What IS proposed IS a substantial Increase m scale to what eXists wlthm the Old Flonda Dlstnct The development 15 not Visually mterestmg and the massmg and scale do not comply WIth the mtended character of the "Old Flonda Dlstnct" and Beach by DesIgn The application proposes to maXimize the allowable density and IS seekIng seven vanatlons from the Code to make thiS project work (reductIOns m lot SIze, width, setbacks, and an mcrease In bUIldmg height) The proposed use IS acceptable, but the overall scale IS not compatible With the eXlstmg surroundmg land uses The proposed reductIOn m lot area will result m a bUildIng, whIch IS out of scale WIth eXlst10g bUIldmgs 10 the Immediate vlclmty of the parcel proposed for development The proposed Increased 10 heIght does not result 10 an Improved Site plan or Improved deSIgn and appearance The proposed reductIOns III side setbacks do not result In an Improved sIte plan, more effiCient parkmg or Improved design and appearance Development of the land, as proposed, WIll not be m harmony WIth the scale, bulk, coverage, denSIty and character of adJacent propertIes DeSIgn of the proposed development does not minImIZe Visual adverse Impacts on adJacent propertIes CODE ENFORCEMENT ANALYSIS: There are no outstanding enforcement Issues associated WIth thIS site Stafi Report - Community Development Board - September 2 I, 2004 - Case FLD2004-03018 - Page 3 STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: (Section 2-801.1 and 2-802): STANDARD PROPOSED CONSISTENT lNCONSISTENT MAXIMUM Four dwelhng umts X DENSITY (maximum of four dwelling units permitted) IMPERVIOUS 07 X SURFACE RATIO (ISR) (maximum ISR is .95) LOT AREA (10,000 0.148 acres; 6,479 square feet X* square feet is minimum requirement) LOT WIDTH (100 60 feet at nearest pomt X* feet minimum required) FRONT SETBACK 5.69 feet at closest pOInt (to X* (35 feet minimum pavement) required) REAR SETBACK (20 10 feet (to deck) X* feet . . nummum requirement) SIDE SETBACK (10 North: 672 feet X* feet . . South: four feet to extenor staIrs nummum requirement) HEIGHT (35 - 100 51 83 feet X* feet allowable FLD ranee) PARKING SPACES SIX spaces, 1.5 spaces per urnt X (1.5 per unit reQuired) * See analysIs above for dtscuSSIOn. Staff Report - Commumty Development Board - September 21, 2004 - Case FLD2Q04-030 18 - Page 4 FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA (Section 2-803.B) applicable to lot area and width, building h . h d b k eie.1 t an set ac s: Conslstent Inconsistent I The reduction In lot area will not result In a bUIldIng, whIch IS out of scale with eXlstmg buildmgs In the ImmedIate VICInIty of the parcel [X] proposed for development 2 The use of the parcel proposed for development WIll not mvolve dlfect [X] access to an artenal street 3 The Increased height results m an Improved SIte plan or Improved [ ] [X] desIgn and appearance 4 The Increased heIght IS necessary to allow the Improvement of off- [X] [ ] street parkmg on the ground floor of the resldenttal bUlldmg 5 The reductIon m SIde setback does not prevent access to the rear of [ ] [X] any buildmg by emergency vehIcles 6 The reductIon m Side setback results In an Improved Site plan, more [ ] [X] effiCient parkIng or Improved design and appearance GENERAL STANDARDS (Section 3-913): Consistent Inwnsistent 1 Development of the land WIll be In harmony WIth the scale, bulk, [ ] [X] coverage, densIty and character of adJacent propertIes. 2 Development Will not hmder or dIscourage development and use of [X] [ ] adJacent land and bUIldmgs or slgnrficantly Impalf the value thereof 3 Development Will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons [X] [ ] resldmg or workmg m the neIghborhood 4 Development IS designed to mlmrmze traffic congestIOn [X] [ ] 5 Development IS consistent wuh the communlty character of the [ ] [X] Immediate VICInIty 6 DesIgn of the proposed development mInimIZeS adverse effects, [ ] [X] Includmg VIsual, acousttc and olfactory and hours of operation IInpacts on adjacent propertIes Swff Report - Commumty Development Board - September 21, 2004 - Case FLD20Q4-030 18 - Page 5 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee revIewed the appltcatIon and supportmg matenals at Its meetmgs on May 6, 2004 and June 10, 2004 The Planmng Department recommends DENIAL of the Flexible Development apphcation to develop four residential attached dwellIng umts on (1) a 6,479 square foot lot (10,000 square feet IS reqUired), wIth (2) a mInImUm lot width of 60 feet (100 feet IS required), seekmg (3) a reductIOn m the front setback from 15 feet to 5.69 feet to pavement, (4) a reductIOn III the side (south) setback from 10 feet to four feet to extenor staIrs, (5) a reductIOn of the sIde (north) setback from 10 feet to 6.72 feet (to bUlldmg), (6) a reductIOn of the rear setback from 20 feet to 10 feet to wooden deck, and (7) a bUlldmg height Increase from 35 feet to 51 83 feet from FEMA to roof mldpomt under the provIsIOns of Section 2-803 B Bases for Demal 1 The proposal does not comply with the FlexIble Development cntena per SectIOn 2-803 B 2 The proposal IS not m complIance WIth other standards m the Code Includmg the General Appl I cablll ty Cn ten a per Section 3 -913 3 The development IS not compatible wIth the surroundmg area and WIll not enhance other redevelopment efforts In the vlcmlty of the SIte location 4 The proposed development IS InconsIstent wIth what IS proposed wlthm Beach by Deslgn for property wlthm the Old Flonda Dlstnct' Prepared by Plannmg Department Staff A IT ACHMENTS Aenal Photograph of Site and VICInIty Location Map Future Land Use Map ZOning Atlas Map ApplicatIon S \Plall1l1ng Deparlmell^C 0 E1\FLEXV'endmg ,au,'\Up for tile lint CD8IBay E~planade 669 La RlIa II (T)\Bay aplanade 669 Staff Report for the September 21, 200411leetmg dOf Staff Report - Communtty Development Board - September 21 2004 - CdSe FLD2004-030 18 - Page 6 [Common Area Restrictions] 30 DOCKS Dock usage IS restncted to (a) occupants and guests of docked or dockmg vessels, (b) umt owners, occupants and guests while flshmg or sunbathmg, (c) other lawful usage by unit owners or occupants subject to the rules and reguldtlons establIshed by the AssociatIOn No parties or similar assemblages shall be permltted on the docks 31 CABANAS Umt Owners are responsible to lock and secure the limIted common use cabana assigned to theIr Umt Each cabana must be locked when not muse Access to the common use cabana (the "Common Cabana") Will be by reservation with the ASsocIatIOn Occupants m good standmg WIth the AssociatIOn may reserve the Common Cabana by contactmg the AssocIatIOn In advance At the tIme of the occupant's reservatlOn, the occupant must contact the ASsoclatlOn, SIgn for the key and agree to abIde by the rules and restnchons set out by the AssoclatlOn for the use of the Common Cabana FaIlure to secure the Common Cabana after use may result m the suspensIOn of pnvileges pursuant to Paragraph 34, below 32 ASSEMBLAGES No parties or assemblages of persons are permitted on the Property In contraventlOn of any law, statute or ordmance 33 NOISES Use of radIOS (excludmg use of manne radIO), tape players, compact dISC players, or other sImilar musIC devICes, IS stnctly prohIbited In the Common Areas, Include, but not limIted to, the docks, pool, hot tub(s), and cabanas between the hours of 9 p m and 9 a ill At all other hmes, such devices shall be used m such a manner as to not disturb fellow occupants, owners and neighbors 34 VIOLATIONS OF COMMON AREA USAGE RESTRICTIONS FaIlure to comply with the restnctlOns on the use of common areas, mcludlng, but not lImited to, the cabanas and the docks, shall result In the suspensIOn of pnvileges for the use of the same / CDB Meetmg Date Case Number Agenda Item Apphcant Address August 17, 2004 FLD2004-030 18 El RadclIffe Development Company. LLC 669 Bay Esplanade CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTl\1ENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: FlexIble Development approval to permIt attached dwellmgs wIth (1) a reductIon of the mmlmum lot area from 10,000 square feet to 6,479 square fe.$k (2) a reductIon of rmmmum lot WIdth from 100 feet to 60 feet;@a reductIOn of the front setback from 15 feet to SIX feet (to pavement},@a reductIon of the SIde (south) setback f;:;; _10 feet to zero feet to wooden walkway, @a reduction of the SIde (north) setback from 10 feet to eIght feet (to bUIldmg), (6) a reductlOn of the rear setback from 20 feet to 10 feet (to deck), and (7) a bUIldmg heIght Increase from 35 feet to 51 83 feet from FEMA to mIdpomt of the roof under the provISIOns of SectIOn 2- 803 B EXISTING ZONINGI LAND USE: Tounst (T) Dlstnct, Resort FacIlIties High (RFH) Category PROPERTY SIZE: o 148 acres, 6,479 square feet PROPERTY USE: Current Use' Apartments (8 UnIts) Propo_sed Use Multi-famIly reSl/dentIal (4 umts) ADJACENT ZONINGI LAND USES: / North West Tounst Dlstnct (T), Overnight accommodatIOns Tounst Dlstnct (T), Overnight accommodations and attached dwelhngs Clearwater Harbor and Tounst Dlstnct (T), Clearwater Harbor Tounst Dlstnct (T), Attached dwellmgs East South CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY: ScenIc north-south beach comdor, overnIght lodgmg, multI-farmly residential, and commerCial Staff Report - Community Development Board - August 17, 2004 - Case FLD2004-030 18 - Page 1 ! CDB Meetmg Date Case Number Agenda Itcm Apphcant Address October 19,2004 FLD2004-030 18 E2 Radcliffe Development Company. LLC 669 Bav Esplanade ORIGINAL CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: FlexIble Development approval to penmt attached dwellIngs wIth (1) a reductIon of thc mImmum lot area from 10,000 square feet to 6,479 square feet, (2) a reductIOn of mmlmum lot width from 100 feet to 60 feet, (3) a reductIOn of the front setback from 15 feet to 5 69 feet (to pavement), (4) a reductIOn of the slde (south) setback from 10 feet to four feet to extenor stairs, (5) a reductIOn of the sIde (north) setback from 10 feet to 672 feet (to bUIldmg), (6) a reductIOn of the rear setback from 20 feet to 10 feet (to wooden deck), and (7) a bUlldmg heIght merease from 35 feet to 51 83 feet from FEMA to mIdpomt of the roof under the provIsIons of SectIOn 2- 803 B EXISTING ZONING I LAND USE: Tounst (T) Dlstnct, Resort FaclhtIes HIgh (RFH) Category PROPERTY SIZE: ~ .' ~ ...\. \i" , IPROPERTY USE: l' o 148 acres, 6,479 square feet Current Use Apartments (8 umts) Proposed Use Mu1tl-famlly reSidentIal (4 umts) ADJACENT ZONINGI LAND USES: East Tounst Dlstnct (T), OvernIght accommodatIOns TourIst DIStnCt (T), Overnight accommodatIOns and attached dwclllngs Clearwater Harbor and Tounst Dlstnct (T), Clearwater Harbor Tounst DIstnct (T), Attached dwellings North West South CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY: Scemc north-south beach comdor, ovcrnlght lodgmg, multl-falmly reSIdentIal, and commercial Staff Report - Commun 1 ty Development BOJrd - October 19, 2004 - CJ~e FL 02004-0301 is - Page I ORIGINAL UPDATE: At the July 20, 2004 Community Development Board (CDB) meeting, a motion to approve this case failed by a vote of 2-3 and the case was automatically contInued to August This case was contmued from the August 17, 2004 meeting because of new plans submitted by the applJcant The staff report has been updated accordmgly The reVISIOns Include a reductIOn m the front setback was changed from SIX feet (to pavement) to 5 69 feet (to pavement), a reductIOn m the SIde (south) setback was changed from zero feet (to woodcn walkway) to four feet (to extenor stairs), a reduction In the Side (north) setback was changed from eight feet (to bUildIng) to 6 72 feet (to bmldmg) (the section of the buildmg hOUSIng the dumpster now opens to the outside) and the Impervious surface ration was reduced from 075 to 070 ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: ThIs 0 148-acre site IS located on the east SIde of Bay Esplanade, approximately 300 feet south of Somerset Street Overnight accommodatIOns and attached dwellmgs domInate the Immediate VICIl1lty to the west, south, and north By Code, the allowable denslty on thIS sIte IS five hotel umts or four dwellmg umts The site contams an eXlstmg, smgle-story, elght-umt apartment bUlldmg, With back out parkIng on Bay Esplanade There IS an eXistIng deck on the east Side of the sIte and an eXistIng walkway from the front of the Site to the rear along the south property lme The eXlstmg bUlldmg and ItS parkmg area fit tightly onto the sIte There IS bmlted landscapmg There IS one eXlstmg dock, located at the east Side of the site, IS proposed to remam by this redevelopment request The site IS located WIthIn the specIal area redevelopment plan, Beach by Deslgn, as part of the "Old Flonda" Dlstnct TIllS area has been designated for multi-family townhomes and condommlUms of low to ffildnse The Immediate vlcmIty IS almost entirely composed of attached dwelhngs and small motels BUlldmg styles generally resemble architecture from the 1950's and appear to have becn progressively expanded Bay Esplanade, In thIS general vlclmty, IS a local street With no Sidewalks where many Sites rely on the pubhc nght-of-way to accommodate perpendIcular, back-out parkmg Generally, the streetscape IS In need of redevelopment to Improve parkmg, pedestnan access, and Its aesthetiC appearance Beach by De'ilgn recogmzcs SIte constramts of parcels In the neIghborhood and difficulties of redevelopment Proposal: The proposal IS to completely raze the eXlstmg apartments and construct four attached dwellIngs ("La Rlsa II") The applicatIOn IS seekIng approval of the use, lot size and Width reductIOns, setback reductions, plus an mcrease m height The proposal show') SIX on-Site parkmg spaces at ground Icvel The bUlldmg IS proposed to be four stones above parkIng and reach to 51 83 feet from a FEMA bUIldIng line to roof mIdpOint ThiS SIte 15. located Within a flood zone (Zone AE) WIth an elevation of 11 feet The bUIldIng elevations show four stones WIth a rooftop terrace over parkmg There IS an elevator ovemm tower extendmg over the roof terrace The deSIgn of the bUIlding Includes arched styling WIth some of the doorways and wmdows Large wmdows are show on the east elevatIOn, With views of Clearwater Harbor The plan5. show the bUlldmg5. to have a beige color stucco fimsh With a red-brown color roof WIndows are proposed to have alummum frammg With a precast stone look tnm The roof IS shown to have a clay hIe miSSIOn shape Wrought Iron ralhngs will be attached to walkways and platforms outSide the bUIldmg on five levels The north and wcst Staff Report - Commumty Development Board - Octo ber 19, 2004 - Ca ~e FLD2004-030 1 8 - Page 2 ORIGINAL elevatIOns show a decoratIve arch]tectural medallion on the north and west sldcs of the elevator tower Extenor staIrs are shown on the north elevatIOn, from the ground level to the roof VehIcular and pedestnan safety would be Improved, as there wIll no longer be any back out parkIng onto Bay Esplanade FIve cabanas and a rest room are shown on the sIte plan at the rear of the Site The deck and dock amemty IS proposed to be shared_ With residents of a residentIal development across the street to the west, (La Rlsa I) Trash collection IS proposed to be made from a solId waste dumpster located mSlde the bUIlding at the front (west SIde) of the site The dumpstcr IS dIrectly accessIble from a door opemng to the SIte cntrance from Bay Esplanade While there ]S a landscape plan, the proposcd setbacks reduce the opportumty for grcen space A SIx-foot hIgh opaque fence IS proposed along the south Side of the property Prellmmary stormwater design has been addressed The deSIgn IS essentIally complete Beach by DesIgn does not specIfically suggest the development as proposcd by thIS applIcatIon Beach by De~lgn reads In part," the scale and mtensIty of the area, wIth relat]vely few exceptIOns, IS substantIally less than comparable areas to the south" The document contemplates "hmlted new constructIon where renovatIOn IS not practIcal" What IS proposed IS a substantIal Incrcase m scale to what eXIsts w]thln the Old Flonda D]stnct The development IS not vIsually mterestmg and the massIng and scale do not comply WIth the mtended character of the "Old Flonda D]stnct" and Beach by DeSIgn The applIcatIon proposes to maXImIze the allowable densIty and IS seekIng seven vanatlOns from the Code to make thiS proJect work (reductions In lot Size, wIdth, setbacks, and an Increase m bUilding heIght) The proposed use IS acceptable, but the overall scale IS not compat]ble With the eXlstmg surroundmg land uses The proposed reduction In lot area will result m a bUlldmg, whIch IS out of scale WIth eXIstmg bUIldIngs m the Immediate VICInIty of the parcel proposed for dcvelopmcnt The proposed mcreased m heIght does not result m an Improved SIte plan or Improved deSIgn and appearance The proposed reductions In Side setbacks do not result In an Improved SIte plan, more effiCient parkmg or Improved deSIgn and appearance Development of the land, as proposed, WIll not be m harmony WIth the scale, bulk, coverage, denSity and character of adJacent properties DeSign of the proposed dcvelopment does not mlmmlZC visual advcrsc Impacts on adjacent properties CODE ENFORCEMENT ANALYSIS: There are no outstandmg enforcement Issues assocIated WIth thIS SIte Stdtl Rcport - Community Dcvelopment Board - October 19,2004 - Case FLD2004-03018 - P'age 3 ORIGINAL STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: (Section 2-801.1 and 2-802): STANDARD PROPOSED CONSISTENT NCONSISTENT MAXIMUM Four dwelling UllIts X DENSITY (maximum of four dwelling units permitted) IMPERVIOUS 07 X SURFACE RATIO (lSR) (maximum ISR is .95) LOT AREA (10,000 o 148 acres, 6,479 square feet X* square feet is minimum req uircmen t) LOT WIDTH (100 60 feet at nearest pomt X* feet minimum required) FRONT SETBACK 569 feet at closest pomt (to X* (35 feet minimum pavement) required) REAR SETBACK (20 10 feet (to deck) X* feet . . mmlmum requirement) SIDE SETBACK (10 North 672 feet X* feet . . South four feet to extenor stalrs mlDlmum req u iremen t) HEIGHT (35 - 100 5 I 83 feet X* feet allowable FLD ran2e) PARKING SPACES SlX spaces, I 5 space::. per umt X (1.5 per unit required) * See analysiS above for dIScussIon S la IT Report - CommUI1l ty Development Board - October 19, 2004 - Case FLD2004-030] 8 - Page 4 OR\G\NAL FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA (Section 2-803.B) applicable to lot area and width, building h ht d tb k elgl an se ac s: Consistent I nco nSlstent I Thc reduction III lot area will no( result III a bUIldmg, whIch IS out of scale with eXlstlllg bUIldings III the ImmedIate VICinIty of the parcel [X] proposed for development 2 The use of the parcel proposed for development will not Involve dlrcct [X] access to an artenal street 3 The Increased height results III an Improved Site plan or Improved [ ] [X] deSIgn and appearance 4 The Increased height IS necessary to allow the Improvement of off- [X] [ ] street parking on the ground floor ofthe residential bUlldmg 5 The reductIOn m side setback does not prevent access to the rear of [ ] [X] any bUIldmg by emergency vehicles 6 The reduction m side setback results III an Improved site plan, more [ ] [X] efficient parkmg or Improved deSIgn and appearance GENERAL STANDARDS (Section 3-913): Consl~tent Inconsistent t Development of the land will be In harmony With the scale, bulk, [ ] [X] coverage, dcnslty and character of adjacent properties 2 Development WIll not hmder or discourage development and use of [X] [ ] adJacent land and bUlldmgs or SIgnificantly ImpaIr the value thereof 3 Development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons [X] [ ] resldmg or workmg In the neighborhood 4 Development IS deSigned to mmlmIze traffic conge~tlOn [X] [ ] 5 Development IS conSIstent With the community character of the [ ] [X] Immcdmte VICInIty 6 DeSign of the proposed development minImIZeS adversc effects, [ ] [X] mcludmg VIsual, acoustIc and olfactory and hours of operation Impacts on adjacent propertIes Slaff Report - Commumty Development Board - October 19, 2004 - Celse FLDZ004-0J 018 - Page 5 ORIGINAL .SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Rcvlew Committee reviewed the application and supportmg matenal& at Its meetmgs on May 6,2004 and June 10,2004 The Plannmg Department recommends DENIAL of the Flexible Development applicatIOn to develop four residentIal attached dwellmg umts on (1) a 6,479 square foot lot (10,000 square feet IS reqUired), with (2) a mlmmum lot width of 60 feet (100 feet IS reqUIred), seekmg (3) a reductIOn m the ITont setback ITom 15 feet to 5 69 feet to pavement, (4) a reductIOn m the side (south) setback from 10 feet to four feet to extenor stairs, (5) a reductIon of the side (north) setback from 10 feet to 6 72 feet (to bUIldmg), (6) a reductIOn of the rear setback from 20 feet to 10 feet to wooden deck, and (7) a bUIlding height mcrease from 35 feet to 51 83 feet from FEMA to roof mldpomt under the proVIsIons of SectIon 2-803 B Bascs for Demal 1 The proposal does not comply WIth the FlexIble Development cntena per Section 2-803 B 2 The proposal IS not m complIance WIth other standards In the Code mcludmg the General ApplIcabIlIty Cntena per Section 3-913 3 The development IS not compatible wlth the surroundmg area and will not enhance other redevelopment efforts m the VICInIty of the site locatIOn 4 The proposed development IS InconSistent With what IS proposed wlthm Beach by Deslgn for property wlthm the Old Flonda DIStrICt Prepared by Plannmg Department Staff /U/~~ 1'3-. ~ MIchael H Reynolds, AICP, Planner III ATTACHMENTS Aenal Photograph of Site and VICInIty LocatIOn Map Future Land Use Map ZOlllng Atlas Map ApplicatIOn 'i' \Planmng Depm ImellllC D,BlrLi'.X\f'endlllg cases I Up for the 1Ie..t CDBIBay Esplanade 6ti9 fa R,va If (7)\Bay Lsplanade 669 StaR Report for the September 11 2004 meetmg doc Slaff Report - Commumty Development Board - Ottober I 9, 2004 - Case FLD2004-030 18 - Page 6 ~ CDB Meetmg Date Case Number Agenda Item ApplIcant Address October 19, 2004 FLD2004-030 18 E2 RadclIffe Development Company. LLC 669 Bay Es?lanade ORIGINAL AL TERNA TE APPROVAL CONDITIONS The followmg are potentIal condItIons that may be Imposed should the applIcatIon be approved Conditions of Approval 1 That the fmal design and color of the bUIldIng be consistent with the conceptual elevatIOns submItted to, or as modifIed by, the CDB, 2 That boats moored at the eXIstmg and any future docks be for the exclusive use by the residents and/or guests of the condommlUms, 3 That all slgnage meet Code and be architecturallY-Integrated mto the design of the sIte and bUlldmg, 4 That there be no Jet slo or other lIke watercraft rental busInesses at thiS location, 5 That the SWFWMD pefmIt or letter of exceptIOn be proVided to Plannmg staff pnor to any bUIldIng permIt Issuance, 6 That a revIsed landscape plan be submttted to the satIsfactIOn of PlannIng staff, pnor to any bUIldIng permIt Issuance, 7 That a revised tree survey be submItted to the satIsfactIOn of Planmng staff, pnor to any bUIldIng permIt Issuance, 8 That the fire service pipelIne mstallatlOn be addressed to the satIsfactIOn of Engmeenng staff, pnor to bUIldIng pefmIt Issuance, 9 That Open Space, Recreation Land and RecreatIOn FaCIlIty Impact fees be satIsfied pnor to the Issuance of bUlldmg permits or final plat, whichever occurs fIrst, 10 That all Fire Department reqUIrements be addressed pnor to bUIldIng permIt Issuance, 11 That all proposed utilities (from the nghts-of-way to the proposed bUIldmgs) be placed underground and mstallatlOn of condUlt(s) along the entire length of the SIte's street frontages be completed pnor to the Issuance of the first certificate of occupancy, 12 That TraffiC Impact Fees be determIned and paid pnor to Certificate of Occupancy Issuance, 13 That the cOndOmInIUm plat be recorded with Pmellas County pnor to the first Certificate of Occupancy, and 14 That the applIcant mstall a SIx-foot bnck wall along the south property hne, conSistent wIth the reVIsed SIte plan, so as to redlfect pedestnan traffic onto the adJacent southern property 5 \Plannmg DepamnenAC D 8IFLEX\Pendmg casei'lUp for the next CDlNJay Elplanade 669 La RIm 11 (T) 92104 CDlN3ay Esplanade 669 Draft Approvol Condllons, October 19,2004 doc ...- --~ v -' CDB Meetmg Date Case Number Agenda Item Applicant Address July 20, 2004 FLD2004-030 18 E7 Radcliffe Development Company, LLC 669 Bay Esplanade ORIGINAL CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNlNGDEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: FlexIble Development approval to permIt attached dwelhngs with (1) a reductIOn of the minImUm lot area from 10,000 square feet to 6,479 square feet, (2) a reduction of mImmum lot wIdth from 100 feet to 60 feet, (3) a reductI on of the front setback from 15 feet to SIX feet (to pavement), (4) a reductIon of the side (south) setback from 10 feet to zero feet to wooden walkway, (5) a reductIOn of the side (north) setback from 10 feet to eight feet (to bUIldmg), (6) a reductIon of the rear setback from 20 feet to 10 feet (to deck), and (7) a bUIldIng height Increase from 35 feet to 51 83 feet from FEMA to mldpomt of the roof under the proVIsIOns of SectIOn 2- 803 B EXISTING ZONINGI LAND USE: Tounst (T) Dlstnct, Resort FaClhtIes High (RFH) Category PROPERTY SIZE: o 148 acres, 6,479 square feet PROPERTY USE: Current Use. Apartments (8 umts) Proposed Use Multi-famIly residential (4 umts) ADJACENT ZONINGI LAND USES: North Tounst Dlstnct (T), OvernIght accommodatIOns West Tounst Dlstnct (T), Overmght accommodatIOns and attached dwellIngs East Clearwater Harbor and Tounst DIstnct (T), Clearwater Harbor South Tounst Dlstnct (T), Attached dwellings CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY: Scemc north-south beach comdor, overnIght lodgmg, multi-famIly resIdentIal, and commercIal Staff Report - Commumty Development Board - July 20, 2004 - Case FLD2004-0301S - Page I ...., ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: This 0 148-acre sIte IS located on the east side of Bay Esplanade, approximately 300 feet south of Somerset Street OvernIght accommodatIOns and attached dwellIngs dOmInate the nnmedlate vlcImty to the west, south, and north By Code, the allowable densIty on thIS sIte IS five hotel umts or four dwelhng umts. The sIte contaIns an eXIstIng, smgle-story, elght-umt apartment bUIldIng, with back out parkmg on Bay Esplanade. There IS an eXlstmg deck on the east side of the site and an eXlstmg walkway from the front of the site to the rear along the south property lIne The eXIstIng bUIldmg and ItS parkIng area fit tightly onto the sIte There IS lImIted landscapmg There IS one eXIsting dock, located at the east side of the sIte, IS proposed to rem am by thIs redevelopment request The sIte IS located WIthIn the specIal area redevelopment plan, Beach by Deslgn, as part of the "Old Flonda" Dlstnct ThiS area has been designated for multi-family townhomes and condommIUms of low to mIdnse The ImmedIate vlcmlty IS almost entIrely composed of attached dwellmgs and small motels BUlldmg styles generally resemble archItecture from the 1950's and appear to have been progressively expanded Bay Esplanade, m thiS general vlcmlty, IS a local street With no sidewalks where many sites rely on the publIc nght-of-way to accommodate perpendIcular, back-out parkIng Generally, the streetscape IS In need of redevelopment to Improve parkmg, pedestnan access, and Its aesthetIc appearance Beach by Deslgn recogmzes site constramts of parcels m the neIghborhood and diffIculties of redevelopment Proposal: The proposal IS to completely raze the eXlstmg apartments and construct four attached dwellIngs ("La Rlsa II") The applicatIOn IS seekIng approval of the use, lot size and WIdth reductlOns, setback reductIOns, plus an Increase In heIght The proposal shows SIX on-sIte parlang spaces at ground level The bUIldIng IS proposed to be four stones above parkIng and reach to 51 83 feet from a FEMA bUlldmg lIne to roof mIdpOInt ThIS site IS located WIthIn a flood zone (Zone AE) WIth an elevatIOn of 11 feet The bUIldmg elevatIOns show four stones With a rooftop terrace over parlang There IS an elevator overrun tower extendIng over the roof terrace The deSign of the bUlldmg mcludes arched styling WIth some of the doorways and wmdows Large wmdows are show on the east elevatIOn, With VIews of Clearwater Harbor The plans show the bUIldmgs to have a beIge color stucco fimsh With a red-brown color roof Wmdows are proposed to have aluminum frammg WIth a precast stone look tnm The roof IS shown to have a clay tile mISSIOn shape Wrought Iron railIngs Will be attached to walkways and platfonns outsIde the bUIldmg on five levels The north and west elevatIOns show a decoratIve archItectural medallIon on the north and west Sides of the elevator tower Extenor statrs are shown on the north elevatIOn, from the ground level to the roof Wmdows and doors proposed on the north and south elevatIOns do not meet BUIldmg Code The setbacks as proposed lImit the use of wmdows and doors to 10 percent of the bUlldmg fa<;ade Vehicular and pedestnan safety would be Improved, as there WIll no longer be any back out parkmg onto Bay Esplanade. A wooden walkway IS proposed along the south SIde of the property for access to the rear deck and dock Five cabanas and a rest room are shown on the site plan at StatfReport - CommunIty Development Board - July 20, 2004 - Case FLD2004-03018 - Page 2 the rear of the site The deck and dock amemty IS proposed to be shared WIth resIdents of a residential development across the street to the west, (La Rlsa I) Trash collectIon IS proposed to be made from a solId waste dumpster located InsIde the bUIldIng at the front (west side) of the site The dumpster IS to be rolled out by complex mamtenance to a stagtng area WhIle there IS a landscape plan, the proposed setbacks reduce the opportumty for green space A six-foot hIgh opaque fence IS proposed along the south side of the property PrelImmary stormwater deSign has been addressed The desIgn IS essentially complete Beach by Deslgn does not specIfically suggest the development as proposed by thiS applIcatIon Beach by DeSign reads m part," the scale and Intensity of the area, with relatively few exceptIons, IS substantIally less than comparable areas to the south" The document contemplates "limIted new constructIOn where renovatIon IS not practical" What IS proposed IS a substantml mcrease m scale to what eXists wlthm the Old Flonda Dlstnct The development IS not Visually mterestmg and the massmg and scale do not comply with the mtended character of the "Old Flonda Dlstnct" and Beach by Deslgn The applicatiOn proposes to maXimIze the allowable denSIty and IS seekmg seven vartatlons from the Code to make thiS proJect work (reductIOns m lot SIze, WIdth, setbacks, and an mcrease In bU11dmg heIght) The proposed use IS acceptable, but the overall scale IS not compatible wIth the eXlstmg surroundmg land uses The proposed reductIon m lot area will result In a bUIldmg, WhICh IS out of scale with eXistIng bUIldIngs In the ImmedIate VICInIty of the parcel proposed for development The proposed Increased m height does not result m an Improved SIte plan or Improved desIgn and appearance The proposed reductIons m sIde setbacks do not result m an Improved SIte plan,.more effIcIent parkmg or Improved desIgn and appearance Development of the land, as proposed, wIll not be In harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, denSity and character of adJacent properties DesIgn of the proposed development does not mITIImIZe Visual adverse Impacts on adjacent properties CODE ENFORCEMENT ANALYSIS: There are no outstandmg enforcement Issues associated with thiS site Staff Report - Community Development Board - July 20, 2004 - Case FLD2004-030 18 - Page 3 STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: (Section 2-301.1 and 2M304): STANDARD PROPOSED CONSISTENT NCONSISTENT MAXIMUM Four dwellmg umts X DENSITY (maximum of four dwelling units permitted) IMPERVIOUS 075 X . SURFACE RA TIO (lSR) (maximum ISR is .95) LOT AREA (10,000 o 148 acres, 6,479 square feet X* square feet is minimum requirement) LOT WIDTH (l00 60 feet at nearest pomt X* feet minimum required) FRONT SETBACK SIX feet at closest pomt (to pavement) X* (35 feet minimum required) REAR SETBACK (20 10 feet (to deck) X* feet . . nummum requirement) SIDE SETBACK (10 North eIght feet X* feet . . South zero feet to walkway nummum requirement) HEIGHT (35 M 100 51 83 feet X* feet allowable FLD ran2e) PARKING SPACES SIX spaces, 1 5 spaces per unIt X (1.5 per unit required) * See analYSIS above for diSCUSSIon Staff Report - Commumty Development Board - July 20, 2004 - Case FLD2004-030 18 - Page 4 FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA (Section 2-803.B) applicable to lot area and width, building h'h d tbk et21 t an se ac s: Consistent Inconsistent 1 The reductiOn m lot area will not result m a buIldmg, which IS out of scale wIth eXlstmg buddmgs m the ImmedIate vlcmlty of the parcel [Xl proposed for development 2 The use of the parcel proposed for development will not Involve dlfect [Xl access to an artenaI street . 3 The Increased heIght results m an Improved site plan or Improved [ J [X] design and appearance 4 The mcreased height IS necessary to allow the Improvement of off- [Xl [ ] street parkmg on the ground floor of the residentIal bUlldmg 5 The reduction In side setback does not prevent access to the rear of [ 1 [X] any bUlldmg by emergency vehIcles 6 The reduction m side setback results m an Improved SIte plan, more [ ] [X] effIcIent parkmg or Improved design and appearance GENERAL STANDARDS (Section 3-913): Consistent Inconsistent 1 Development of the land wIll be In harmony with the scale, bulk, [ ] [X] coverage, density and character of adJacent properties 2 Development will not hInder or discourage development and use of [X] [ ] adjacent land and bUIldIngs or sIgmflcantly Impalf the value thereof 3 Development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons [X] [ ] resIdIng or workmg In the neighborhood 4 Development IS desIgned to mInImIZe traffIc congestion [X] [ ] 5 Development IS consistent wIth the commumty character of the [ ] [X] Immediate vlclmty 6 Design of the proposed development mInImiZeS adverse effects, [ ] [X] mcludmg visual, acoustIC and olfactory and hours of operatIOn Impacts on adjacent propertIes Staff Report - Commumty Development Board - July 20, 2004 - Cuse FLD2004-030 18 - Page 5 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development ReVIew CommIttee reviewed the applIcatIOn and supportmg matenals at Its meetmgs on May 6,2004 and June 10,2004 The Planmng Department recommends DENIAL of the FlexIble Development applIcation to develop four resIdential attached dwellIng umts on (1) a 6,479 square foot lot (10,000 square feet IS reqUired), wIth (2) a mInimum lot wIdth of 60 feet (100 feet IS reqUIred), seekmg (3) a reductIon In the front setback from 15 feet to SIX feet to pavement, (4) a reductIOn In the sIde (south) setback from 10 feet to zero feet to wooden deck walkway, (5) a reductIOn of the sIde (north) setback from 10 feet to eIght feet (to bUIldmg), (6) a reduction of the rear setback from 20 feet to 10 feet to wooden deck, and (7) a bUIldmg height Increase from 35 feet to 51 83 feet from FEMA to roof mldpomt under the provISIons of SectIOn 2-803 B Bases for DenIal 1 The proposal does not comply with the Flexible Development cntena per SectIOn 2-803 B 2 The proposal IS not In comphance WIth other standards In the Code mcludIng the General ApplIcabIlity Cntena per SectIon 3-913 3 The development IS not compatIble wIth the surrounding area and WIll not enhance other redevelopment efforts m the VICInIty of the sIte locatIon 4 The proposed development IS mconSlstent wIth what IS proposed wlthm Beach by DeSIgn for property wlthm the Old Flonda Dlstnct Prepared by PlannIng Department Staff h1/~ /fl. ~ Michael H Reynolds, AICP, Planner ill ATIACHMENTS Aenal Photograph of SIte and VICInity LocatIOn Map Future Land Use Map ZOnIng Atlas Map ApplIcation S \Plannmg Departmen^C D E1\FLEX\Pendmg cases\Up for the next CD/JI.Bay Esplanade 669 La Rlsa II (TJlBay E'planade 669 Stuff Report doc Staff Report - Community Development Board - July 20, 2004 - Case FLD2004-030 18 - Page 6 Rice. Scott To: Cc: Subject. Reynolds, Mike Melone, Donald FLD2004-03018 - 669 Bay Esplanade s.~ ~tJ{J{ Mike Two of the Engmeermg conditions on this application have not been met: 1) The fire service pIpeline to the proposed stand pipe cannot be mstalled on a restricted Ime 6/24/04 - NOT MET - THIS FIRE SERVICE LINE IS RESTRICTED BY A DDCV 2) SEE SHEET 7 OF 10, THE FIRE SERVICE PIPELINE IS TO BE INSTALLED BY THE CONTRACTOR. THE TAPPING SLEEVENALVE AND BACKFLOW PREVENTORlMETER WILL BE INSTALLED BY THE CITY AT THE APPLICANTS EXPENSE, The two above Items could be handled as conditions, but It would be better if they were resolved prior to distribution of the plans to the CDB rr (..v<.:> .ornrcondltlon~that should be Included III your staff report IS Prior to building permit, proVide a copy of a SWFWMD permit or letter of exemption D. Scott Rice Land Deve/. Engr. Manager 727-562-4781 scott.rice@MyClearwater.com P(2l01t.- +=- ??/l-) I e~ ~C- DC<:""'-".(J fM.c- 1 J 1 _I '- I F <AJ l 0\ e.. e r-J (c-,\ P....c C ~(Af-, DL t'2.e (O/Ld-,.... '\ o t CL..Ad <::> 1 ~ ~{.biJO()t/ -03011 "J;loq I!;;wr./ _ c~:t2 }"l!2dfl2.~ t' " ,~ CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTJCE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS The Cummunlty Development Board of the CIty of Clearwater Flonda, wlll hold pubhe heanngs on fuesddY, August 17, 2004 begmnmg at 1 00 pm., III the City CounCIl Chdmbcr<;, 111 City I-Iall, 3rd Ooor, ] 12 South O<;G(,Old Avenue, Ckdrwater, Flonda, to con~lder the followmg relluest~ NO I E All persons wlshm(! to address an Item need to be pre~ent .It the BEGINNING of the meetlfll!. TllO'lC cases that arc not conte~ted bv the applicant. statt. nel2hbonn[! propertv OWllcn, cte will be placed on a cOllsent al!end.l and d ppro "ed bv a sm21e vote at th e bC[!1Il1ll1l1! of the meetllll! ] Vlre:lll1a R Franks (Rddchffe Development Company, LLC) are requestlllg a Flexible Development dpproval to develop 4 resH]enlldl dltached dwelhng umts on a 6,479 sq ft lot (10,000 sq ft I'> required), with a Immmum lot WIdth of 60 ft (100 ft IS required), a reductIOn 111 the front "etbdGk from] 5 n to 6 ft to pavement, a reduction m the Side (south) setback from lOft to zero ft to wooden deGk walkway, a reduchon of the SIde (north) setbdck from] 0 ft to 8 ft (to bUlldmg), .I reductIOn of the re,lr setback from 20 ft to 10 ft to wooden deck, dnd a bUlldmg heIght mcrease from 35 ft to 51 83 ft from FEMA to roof mldpomt under the provI~lon';. of SCGtlOn 2-803 B (Proposed Use Attached dwellmgs) at 669 Rav Esplanade, M,mddlay U11lt No 5 Rcpldt, Blk 77, Lot 8 fr:b2004'!03~ 2 Jo.lIln A Palmen IS requesting d Flexlblc Development approval to permit the conversIOn of a smgle-famlly detached dwellmg mto an attdched dwGlhng (duplex) under the prOVISIons of SectIon 2-204 b d~ d Re';.ldent131 ]nfill Project (Proposed Use: Duplex m associatIOn With an eXlsttng smgle-fdml]Y home) dt 517 Skvvlew Ave, Boulevard Pmes, Blk A, Lot~ ] 7 -] 8 & part of Lot ] 9 F L1J2004~0403 0 1 \Vdhdm 1\1 Shephard TRI<~ I Lae:oon Resort Motel arc requestmg a FleXible Development approvdl for the construetlOn of a 22 7 5 sq ft addItIOn (prevIOusly constructed Without permIt) to an eXlstmg 2 775 ~q ft commercial dock under the provIsIOns of SectIOn 3-60 I (Proposed Use: Addlhon to an cXlstmg dock for Shf-pard's) at 619 South Gulf vIew Blvd, Bayslde Sub No 5, Blk C, Lots 1-5 FLD2004-05033 4 )< ulvlO & 1\1dddalena Dlvcllo are requestmg a Fltxlble Development approval to Tenmnate the StdtuS of a Nonconfonmty for denSIty Wlthlll the Tounst Dlstnct to permit the relocdtlon of five overnIght aGconmlOddtlon Ul1lts from the southern bUlldmg (BUlldmg A) to the northern bUllchng (BUlldlllg B) and the converSIOn of 5 overl1lght aceommoddhon Ulllt';. In the southern bUlldmg (Bw]dmg A) to deCe%Ory <;tordg(, and hotel office usage with a reduction to the front (we<;t) setback from ] 5 ft to zero ft (to eXlstlllg pavement), a reduetlOn to the front (south) setback from ] 5 ft to 7 fl: (to eXlshng pavement), a reductlOn to the "Ide (north) setback from ] 0 ft to 3 ft (to eXisting pdvement), d reductlOn to the Side (ea"t) setback from 1 0 ft to 3 ft (to eXlstlllg pavement), an mcredse to height from 35 ft to 48 ft (exlslmg BUlldmg A) dnd from 35 ft to 67 ft (exlstlllg BUlldmg B) dnd to ehmmatE. the 5 foot WIde foundatIOn landscape area adjacent to the southern bUlld1l1g (BUlldmg A), under the provI<;lons of SectIOn 6-]09 C and SectIOn 2-803 I, With a Comprehemlve Ldndscape Program, under the provl<,lOns of SectIOn 3-] 202 G (Propo~ed U~e OvernIght accommodallOn use of a proposed total of] 10 UllltS) dt 445 1I..mde" Dr , Columbia Sub No 5, Lots 4 - 1] lIlcl & npanan fights & land adJ FLlJ2004-04021 5 Rchl!lOllS CommullItv Servlces (RCS). Inc. (F Blake Longacre) drc reque<,tmg .I Fkxlble Development approval to pern11t a t111xed use development With reductIOns to the front (east) setback along Myrtle Ave from 25 ft to ]5 ft (to Pdvement) and 2] ft (to bUl]dmg) dnd the "Ide (~oulh) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to pavement), dnd .I butldmg heIght Increase from 25 ft to 59 ft from Base rlood ElcvdtlOn (BFE) to roof mldpomt, under the prOVISIOns of SectIOn 2-704 F (Proposed Use Mixed-use development WIth 48 attached dwellmgs, 2,757 sq ft ofretalJ spdce dnd ] ,600 sq ft of rcstaurdnt "pace) at 610 South Mvrtlc Ave, Magnoha Park, Blk 2], Lots ]-3 & 6-]0 mcl and Magnolia Park, Blk 26, Lots 1,2,9&10 dnd part of Lots 3,4, 5 &8 FL02004-05039 6 Global FlIl,mclal Investments. LLC (FKA. Corpor.lte Properties. LLC) & Geore:e C Clark Invcstments. L TO dre requestll1g a FleXIble Development approval WIth reduGhon 0] Ihe fronl (west) <;clback along Lawson Rd from 25 ft to 14 ft (to bUlld1l1gt frum 25 ft to 10 ft (to pavement), reductlOn~ to front (ea'>t) ~Gtback along Law<;on Rd from 25 ft to 7 ft (to patlOs), from 25 ft to ] I ft to (bmldmg) and from 25 ft to 10 ft (to pavcmwt), d redllGtlOn of the front (north) ~ctback along Blackburn St from 25 ft to 8 tt (to pavement), and reductlOns to a ldnlbcdpc buffel from 10ft to 7 ft (to pallO'>) along the east SIde of Ld\V~on Rd, from 10ft to 6 ft (to pavement) along the west ~Ide of Llw<,un Rd, and from 10 ft to 8 ft (to pavement) along the north Side of Blackburn St, as a Resldenl1aJ lnfill P10Jcct, Ull(kl the provl<;lOns of Section 2-304 C, and Prel11111nary Plat dpprovdl for 281 lOIS, and a<; a Comprehen<;lve Landscape Program, undu the provIsIons of SectIOn 3- \. ~~ 1202 G (Propowd Use A reSidentIal development of 281 attached dwellings) dt 2520 Sunsct POInt Rd , Bldckbllm''l Sub, part of Lots] I & ] 2 & vac sl FLD2004-020 II 7 Commul1ltv Redevelopment Al!cncv & Tone 40. LLC are requesting a Flexlbk Dcvelopmwt dpproval to permIt a mIxed-use development and a bUlldl11g wlthlll the reqlllfcd sight V1Slblllty tndngle'l JIang Ldllfd Street bdlcol11es along the front (north) fd((udc along Laura Street which extend 50 1I1ches 11110 a public nghl-of-WdY, reduction of thc IcqUlred number of pJrkmg spaces from 229 spdce~ to 196 space'l, an mcrease 111 the permitted height from 30 feet to 165 feet (buddtng hClght of 158 feet and a ~cven foot parapet wall) and an IllCrCd:,C of the permitted density from 64 dwellmg umh to 126 dwclhng umts by mlllg 62 dwellmg umts from the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan dred Pubhc Amemtles Incentive Pool, as a ComprehensIve [nfill Redevelopment Project, under the provISIons of SectIOn 2-901 C and a ComprehensIve Landscape Progr<ml to chmmate the reqUIrement to provide foundatIOn plantmgs, under the provl~lons of SectIOn 3-1202 G (J>roposed Use A mixed-use development wIth 126 JttaGhed dwe]hng'l and 10,000 sq ft of restaurant and retail ~dle~ and service) at 628 Clcveland St, Gould & EW\lJg's 2nd Add, Blk 19, Lots 4-11 and pJrt of Lot 12 F L D2004-05 03 6 8 Clearwater HOU1.ml! Authorltv IS requestmg a FleXible DGvdopment approval (1) to penmt a mixed use development (nonresIdential and dttaGhed dwelllllgs) III the proposcd Commercial (C) D1StrlCt With d reductIOn to the front (mtemal proposed street:,) ~etbaek from 25 ft to zero ft (to bUlldmg and pavement) dnd dn mGrGasc to blllldmg heIght from 25 ft to 50 ft <IS a ComprehensIve Infill Redevdopment Project, under the prOVISIOns of Section 2-704 C, and (2) (a) to permit attached dwellmgs III the proposed Medium DenSity ReSIdential (MDR) DI~tnGt WIth a reductIon to the front (north - Drew St) setback from 25 ft to 22 ft (to patms), reductmlJ!. to thc front (east - Bayvlew Blvd) setbaGk from 25 ft to 15 ft (to pavement) and from 25 ft to 22 ft (to dumpster enclosure), reductIOns to thG front (mtemal proposed streets) from 25 ft to ] 0 ft (to buddmg and pdvement), an lDcrease to blllldmg hClght from 30 ft to 50 ft and a deViatIOn to reduce the height of fence or wall from 4 ft to 3 ft to screen parklllg from adjacent pdrGcJs or street nghts-of-wilY, dnd (b) to permit detached dwellings With d rcductlOn to lot dred from 5,000 sq ft to 4,600 sq ft, d reduGtJon to lot WIdth from 50 fl to 40 ft, a reduUlOn to the front (mtcmal proposed streets) setbdck from 25 ft to 16 ft (to bUlldlllg) dnd from 25 ft to 10 It (to bUlldmg - GOmer lots), a rcduGtlOn to the Side setback from 5 It to zero ft (to bUlldll1g and pavf-ment) and a deViatIOn to allow the reduced lot .IRa and Width for new lots, ,IS a ReSidentIal lnfill Project, under the proVISIOns of SectIOn 2-304 G, (3) d Prehm1l1ary Plat for 25 attdched dwel1mg (townhome) 10t~ dnd 67 detached dwelhng (zero-Iot-lme) lots and (4) the vacatIOn of the Tangkwood Dr ,lIld Sandlewood Dr rights-of-way and easements 011 the subject property (Proposcd Usc A mIxed-use development of 295 totdl dwclhng umts (lllcludmg 67 detached dwellmgs and 228 dttdGhcd dwelhngs), 30,000 sq ft of retail use, 5,000 sq ft accessory day care center, 22,000 sq ft accessory commulllty center, 5,450 sq ft clubhouse) at 2995 Drew St, See 17-29- ] 6, M&B II 01 F L D2004-05034/P L T2 004-000 06 9 AntonJos MarkODoulos. T M Me!:!as and Kolo'lsos [nn. Inc are requestlllg (I) FleXIble Dcvelopment approval to I ermllldte thG Status of a Noneonfomllty for denslty wlthm the I'ounst Dlstnct, under the proVISIOns of SectIOn 6-109 C, (2) FleXible Development dpproval to permit 350 overlllght dccommodatlOn umts and 75 dttdched dwdhngs a:, a mIxed use (WI th \lJcrea~e III dGn~1 ty of 250 hote I room~ from the Beach by DeSign den~1 ty pool), with a reductIOn to the front (eJ:,t along Coronddo Dr) setback from 15 ft to Lero ft (to bUlldmg), J reductIOn to the front (south along proposed Sccond SI ) sctbdGk from 15 ft to zero ft (to bUlldlllg), a reductIOn to the front (west and north along South Gulfvlcw Blvd) setback from 15 ft 10 Lero ft (to bmldmg) an Increase to lhe bUllchng heIght from 35 ft to 150 fl (to foof deck) WIth an dddltlOnal 5 n fOf penmeter paJdpets (from roof deck) ilnd <In addltlOnal 33 ft for ckvator, stan, mechameal rooms/archltcctural embclhshments (from roof deck), deVIatIOns to allow <,tdGked parkmg and allow a bwldmg wlthm the reqUIred Sight vlslblllty tnangles at the mtersectlOn of Coronado Dr and propo<,ed Second St , as a ComprehenSIve Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provlSlOns of Section 2-803 C, and to ehmmate the requlrf-d foundatIOn landscapmg along Coronado Dr and proposed Second St, as a Comprehen~lve LandsGdpe Program, under the proVISions of Secllon 3- 1202 0, and (3) the VdcdtlOn of a portion the nght-of-way for Oulfvlew Blvd between Coronado Dr and propo::,ed Scwnd St, the vdeatlon of the First St nght-ot-way between Coronado Dr and Gulf vIew Blvd, thc dedlcatlOn of right-of-way for proposed Second St between Coronado Ave and GulfvKw Blvd and the dedlcatlOn ofnght-of-way for Coronado Dr between proposed Second St and Gulfvlc\V Blvd (Proposed Use Hotel of 350 rooms, 75 dttaehed dwcllmgs and a maxImum of 37,000 sq f1 0/ Jmemt1C'l accessory to thG hotel) at 100 Coronado Dr , Lloyd- Whlte-Skll1ner Sub, Lob 44-55, 90-100 102, pdrt of Lot 56 & 101, and Co]umbla Sub, Blk A, Lot] FL02004-02013 II]tGrGstcd partIes may dppcar and be heard at the heilnng~ or file wntten notice of approval or ObjCGtlon WIth thc Pl,mnll1g DIrector or City Clerk prior to the heanngs Any person who deCIdes to dppedl any deGlSlOn mddc by the Board, With respect to any matter consldercd dt SLIGh heanng'l, w1l1 need to reque'lt tlnel obtdllJ pJI1y ::,tatus by the BOdrd dUring the case d I SCUS~lon a record of the p rocecdmgs anu, for such put pose , may need to ensure thdt d vcrbdtllTI reGord of the proceedmgs IS made, whICh record mcludes thc testImony and eVIdence upon whIch the appedl 15 to be bdsed per Flonda Statute ~ " 286 0105 Commumty Development Code SectIOn 4-206 stales that party status shall be gnmted by the Board If person reque<;tlllg <;uch demonstrates that slhe I'> substantially dffected Party ~tdtu~ entitle,> ralile~ to pcr,>on,dly testdy pre~ellt eVidence, argument and wltnef>Se&, cros,>-examme wltnef>&es, appeallhc dCCI'>lOn ,md speak on reconsideratIOn request'> An oath wlll be admlIlIstercd ,>wearIng all pdrt1(.lpants III publlc hearIng cases I f you wish to speak plea~e walt to be recogmzed, then state dnd spell your name dnd provide your address Persons spedkmg before the COB ,>hall be hmlted to three m1l111tes unless an mdlvldual 1& reprc<;entIng a group III whIch case the Chdlrpcr<,on may ,mthonze a reasonable amount of tlmc up to 10 mlllllte<; Five days pnor to the meetlllg, stdff reports and recommendatIOn,> on the above requests WI]] be available for review by lllterested partie,> between the hours of 8 30 a m and 4 30 pm, weekdays, at the CIty of Clearwdter, PI,mnlllg Department 100 S Myrtle Ave, Clearwater, FI.., 33756 Please contact frank GGrlock Development ReVIeW Manager, at 562-4557 to diSCUSS any questions or concern,> about the project dndlor to better understand the proposal and revIew the SIte plan TIm nollce was sent by the Officldl Records and Legl<,]atJvc Serv1(.es Department, CynthIa E Goudeau, CMC, CIty Clerk Lisa Flerce Plannlllg Depdrtmcnt Cyntlm E Goudeau, CMC CIty Clerk CIty ofClLarwater POBox 4748, Clcdfwater, FL 33758-4748 NOTE ApplICant or representatIve mll,>t be present at the heallng YOU ARE BEING SENe! fHIS NOTICE IF YOU ARE THE APPLICANT OR OWN PROPERTY WITHIN 200 FT OF THF SUBJECT PROPERTY A COPY OF' THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN THE OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES DEPT. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODA nON IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATF IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL THE OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES DEPT WITH THEIR REQUEST AT (727) 562-4090 Ad 08/01/04 Cotoq f~~. · HOLDEN, ROBERT L 12 STILLWATER HEIGHTS DR WEST BOYLSTON MA 01583 - 1122 ~~AO?XJlg ML DEAN REAL EST ATE INV INC 647 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATERFL33767 -1617 BOYES, JAMES R BOYES, GEORGIA 969 BRUCE A VB CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1013 COATES I INC 873 ISLAND WAY CLEARWATERFL 33767 -1826 SEIFERT, MICHAEL E SEIFERT, NANCY S 5825 PERSIMMON DR MADISON WI 53711 - 5003 SMITH, MARK A SMITH, CHARLENE S 701 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 1409 JOHNSON, ROBERT A EDWARDS, CHRISTIE B 266 ESTEBAN WAY SAN JOSE CA 95119 - 1515 HAYS, WilLIAM D 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 304 CLEARWATER FL 33767 ~ 1536 FRANKS, VIRGINIA B 669 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATERFL 33767 -1503 PALMA, GEORGE 32 FORGE DR DOWNSVIEW ON M3N 2R3 00030 - CANADA LEWINSKI, WOJCIECH LEWINSKI, HANNA 661 POINSETTIA A VB # 306 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1537 NEIL, MARIE-THERESE 4 RUE DE SA VOlE PARIS 75006 00017- FRANCE FOLEY, DONALD F FOLEY, CATHERINE G 661 POINSETTIA A VB # 108 CLEARW A TER FL 33767 - 1534 BANNON, MARYK TRE BANNON, PATRICK TRE 910 STRATFORD LN DOWNERS GROVE II.. 60516 - 1951 FISHER, BRETT L 699 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 1506 :MEROLI, PETER 967 ELDORADO AVE CLEARWATER BEACH FL 33767 - 1020 JACKSON, LANNY R JACKSON, VICKI J 651 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARW A TER FL 33767 - CZIPRI, BRENDA K mE 334 EAST LAKE RD STE 338 PALM HARBOR FL 34685 - 2427 BANNON, PATRICK J TRE BANNON,MARYK TRE 910 STRATFORD LN DOWNERS GROVE II.. 60516 - 1951 MOULIS, JAMES M C/O JUREWICZ, JAN 689 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 1503 DE BELLIS, BARBARA 55 SOMERSET 81 # 3 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1546 LEWINSKI, WOJCIECH LEWINSKI, HANNA 60 SOMERSET # 3 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1543 RHOADS, JEFFREY L TRE PO BOX 861 DUNEDIN FL 34697 - 0861 SNO-BIRD PROP INC 10 PRINCE ST CUMBERLAND CTR ME 04021 - 4007 VERBAN, STEVE YERBAN, HELEN K 55 SOMERSET ST CLEARWATERFL 33767 -1546 LUNDELL, ROBERT LUNDELL, JANE 1989 S STPAUL ST DENVER CO 80210 - 3533 BERETA, STANLEYD TRE 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 203 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1535 MOLEPSKE, MARK R WALSH, JOHN F C/O HENDERSON, KEITH 19071 FAIRHA YEN EXT SANT A ANA CA 92705 - BOERNER, SUSANA B 112 S LAUBER WAY TAMPA FL 33609 - 2615 RADA Y, DAVID M YOUNG, SEAN 2011 CROYDON DR CLEARWATER FL 33764 - PASQUALE, JACKR TRE PASQUALE, PATRICIA A TRE 1433 NORMAN DR DARIEN IL 60561 - 4434 SILLASEN, SEAJAYE 11503 BRIARWOOD DR LAKEWOOD CO 80226 - 3711 FORLINI, DOMENICO G 808 MANDALA Y AVE CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 1324 DI DOJ\1IZIO INVESTMENTS INC FITZGERALD, RONALD KOEGLER, WALTER A 90MlLVANDR 665 POINSETTIA A VB KOEGLER, JEAN TORONTO ON M911Z6 00030- CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 1530 135 BRIGHTWATERDR CANADA CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2402 JACKSON, LANNY R THURMOND, WILLIAM H HILDEBRAND, WILLIAM 0 JR JACKSON, VICKI J THURMOND, CAROL H 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 107 651 BAY ESPLANADE 643 BA Y ESPLANADE CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 1534 CLEARWATERFL 33767. CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1617 ARMBRUSTER, JOHN PETRAS, JAMES T DI DOMIZIO INVESTMENTS !NC 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 209 31 ISLAND WAY # 1001 90MILVANDR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1535 CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2207 TORONTO ON M9L lZ6 00030 CANADA SPERELAKIS, NICHOLAS SR ROZENITS, FRED MASTORIDES, NICHOLAS SPERELAKIS, DOLORES J ROZENITS, ANNA MASTORIDES, LACEY 12114 PAULMEADOWS DR 31 ISLAND WAY # 1002 2187 VIOLA DR CINCINNATI OH 45249 - 1330 CLEAR WATER FL 33767 - 2207 CLEARWATERFL 33764 - 3738 CZIPRI, BRENDA K TRE GRASSO, JOSEPH F FIVE PALM CONDO ASSN!NC 334 EAST LAKE RD STE 338 GRASSO, OLGA 673 BAY ESPLANADE PALM HARBOR FL 34685 - 2427 30 TURNER ST # 504 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1503 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5258 WICKY, JERRY E KELLY INV & MGMT CORP CAPRI MOTEL CONDO ASSN WICKY, BETTY W PO BOX 3339 55 SOMERSET ST APT 3 23lLAFAYETTEBLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 8339 CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 1546 OLDSMAR FL 34677 - 3754 YOUNG, SEAN MEROLI, PETER COQUINA APTS TNC 673 BAY ESPLANADE # 105 967 ELDORADO AVE 692 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - CLEARWATER BEACH FL 33767 CLEARWATERFL 33767 ~ 1500 - 1020 CZIPRI, BRENDA K TRE KIELMANN, LOTHARE ROLLINSON, CLINTON F 334 EAST LAKE RD STE 338 KIELMANN. WENDY ROLLINSON, ANN C PALM HARBOR FL 34685 - 2427 35154 LEON ST 275 KNOLLWOOD RD LIVONlA MI 48150 - 2668 MANCHESTER CT 06040 - 2403 FRANKS, VIRGINlA B FERGUSON, MELODIE A D-GEM 669 BAY ESPLANADE PENNOCK, ROBERT M 625 BAY ESPLANADE CLEAR WATER FL 33767 - 1503 665 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1617 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1598 MC FADDEN, ARLENE S THOMPSON, MICHAEL S WINCHESTER, GARY MC FADDEN, ROBERT G THOMPSON, MARIA WINCHESTER, PAMELA 661 POINSETTIA A VB #204 BRENDON FEN POND RD IGTHEHM 673 BA Y ESPLANADE # 207 NEAR SEVEN OAKS CLEARWATERFL33767 -1535 KENT TN15 9JE 00003. CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 1503 GREAT BRITAIN MC KINNEY, CARMELLA C MC KINNEY, GEORGE L 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 210 CLEARWATERFL 33767 -1535 MERRITT, GORDON E MERRITT, M SUZANNA 661 POINSETTIA AVE CLEARWATERFL 33767- GEOMAR HOLDINGS INC 115 ARGYLE KIRKLAND QC H9H 3H9 00030 CANADA WOSCHITZ, EVA TRE 302 POINSETTIA LAND TRUST 10 COURTWOOD PL TORONTO ON M2K lZ9 00030- CANADA Radcliffe Development Company 2424 Curlew Rd Clearwater, FL 33683 EPIC HOLDINGS SOUTH 139 BA YSIDE DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2502 ALISON, EMMA F 644 BAY ESPLANADE # 2 CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 1501 LETOURNEAU, WILLIAM T lllRSCH, DEBORA A 395 16TH ST NEWPORT MN 55055 ~ 1061 SMITH, RUPERT W JR SMITH, IRENE V 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 106 CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 1534 Clearwater Beach AssocIatIon DaVld MacNamee 827 Mandalay Ave Clearwater, FL 33767 PENTHOUSE SHORES ASSN INC 661 POINSETTIA AVE CLEARWATERFL33767 -1561 DOM, MARY 65 SOMERSET S1 CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 1547 JAKSCH, ROBERT W C/O CONLEY, BEATE 1596 SHIRLEY PL LARGO FL 33770 - 2218 KeIth Zayac, P E 101 Philippe Parkway, Ste 205 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 Clearwater NeIghborhood Coalition Doug WIll1ams, President 2544 Fnsco Dr Clearwater, FL 33761 FLD2004-030 18 ... .. '" Aerial Map Site: 669 Bay Esplanade I Case: Property Size(Acres) : FLD2004-o30 18 Owner. Virgina Franks 0.15acres PIN: OS/29/15/54756/077/0080 A tlas Page: 258A -J- . --- Views looking east at front of property Views looking west from rear of property View looking northwest 669 Bay Esplanade View looking southwest FLD2004-030 18 Owner I Vlrglna Franks g L "" O;Q1J · 0 ~-f1 LI 0" n 0 o~D lU:rr ~On;D of, rr~ cro ID~,D D! ~~ig. I\CAaIl Sf lPMER3I!:TC=:I c::::::::J 0" c.wIlRIA 'iI c::::::::J " c:::J """"'" """.....w.. PROJECT ~D~ SITE i:=:J ~ My ~ /lv~m & ~......~ i\JI [=:J Oil f;; ~[ g~ 3L BAYMONT Sf !3ti~[ PJlPA'fA 51 1nfl ~ 0"",,_- . 'I '/; .. " b b ,. i ~ Location Map Site 669 Bay Esplanade I Case' Property Size (Acres) FLD2004-Q30 18 0.15acres PIN OS/29/15/54756/077/0080 I Atlas Page 258A Fll E COpy .., J~ ,r~l {\ ~ -}I-I I r I I I 1 I I I j I l I r I J J I I I L--''l _.... _.J.l _-- L.--- !r -l ~- I 1 1 I ,T"}, ~ J II--~-'---I -i-l I -~ Ef i 1 I r'f" II I ,~ I I I" I .:- I \ J 1_ I 1--1 1 I I -- 1 I - - 1 1 I I 1 1 1 -~ ~-- J 1 <'I 1 I a I'" I I .J I,., 6~2 __1-"1 '''r-:...! -- "'--- 1__'11 fll Ii!! I 'l:l P'~ I \ \r9J"'""-,""l_j - SOMERSET ST ~_...J ~~ OJ ....;:. )0. -< ! C.-AC~~I;'b"datjO ~ ~~~;---j -0 J~ .-r:-I -__Jl - I-~ r- ~I <F '-' 1 I 6li" )> 1 5 I I Z 168 1_ !\tiactie-a--l ~ ~~__~:'r_ !>wellings ! m! IYtat:~ d d$51 I I-A- Llc~'_. ~~J!W\ ~s I --I --j ttaql ..d I..oaw.~_j) l....r, : : - I I --I [J't '\--' y- t1/",,'A:~'~ / 1'" (:,r '64,,/ 'vJ ,- - -j I --~; ----1 - ---1 I --1 -I I I I I ---' ~ ----l I "LJ < ,--, ~-- I I ~ ____J --I r~ ) r 9 ~" l...:'Ac I I --, 1 -, ,vn L_~": i---ef2 --~2 I I ---tj58 I I ---I ~ ----..,. ~-1 Jo I -----, I fLw---' 1 I I :..:--r -::.'-=..:1 '1 : iLL 64~ -~ I-I ,-I I - --63s1 e: _ _~ ROYAL WAY . . _"1..1 ,"2.- r!Q-/ I 1 \ - 11 1 I 1__-,1 r--J r--.J 7o!-J I f ?QI;-l - L~_J 6+---"] I 661 1_ _ gs rl r- - I I 1 I I .11067 jl ~ ....... _~ I ~ __l} ~ ,__ ~-:" I I ....." 1 11<------...- J _--' l ,--_-:J -~ 19ht ~\ .........\....__~\ tion ,~1 A I I ,,"' 'l_ '" /_ - L ~ /' d i-I <... ~1~ I I 11-' ~ ;elli)lgs "II ,,,I - '....~~1 J ~I/ :5: I '-----, .q: I 62~ s: ~ .... l.lJ CI) ~ o a. I 1-1 I /_ II I L I) J lit I, II" ..... 1'0 II Jf)' } \ ".ps ,/ S " /' \ \ ~--"\,. ~~~, \ 6.........~_,.1 \ j ---.-~} 6\1 _I ;- I 6n--I-=- 8 ~ '" .\ I-~ '\ ~ ,J v c\...--)lr-~ ...J 61~ I, ~ ~ \ ,---li' LI 6.to 1 \, (1J -r---- "1 ~':..=:.-- !"'6Oi.i- - 6.s>6 )0. ~OV" -; \ \1 ~f8_ L 1 \ <I- r - ...., If; --, m ~~ I _\r-~::i"~.2\ \ i I ~ \ .l. ,\ r 'J JliU<' Existing Land Use Map lease Property Slze{Acres) Owner: I Vlrglna Franks Site 669 Bay Esplanade PIN I Atlas Page A\ !i\/iI I!f\jj FLD2004-030 18 o 15acres OS/29/15/54756/077/0080 258A .., ,1h ,I'?, ~ ~ -l'i I' I I I I I 1 I l I ,.I L1 --I:.J I '--1' ~--'" _;--' !r -1 i r] -, ,;; -:r-t: 1 ----'---, ---, , ~ Ef I 1 I! II" I ill "g I I I 1 'F"~ I ,I I " ) I" I .c1 1 \ J ,- I "--1 I I I L__ 'I - - I I I , , I I -~ "-_ J <~n ,,' ,,,,,,~ "", uf' 5 ~I' "",...J -- ">---~ '-_'4 1ll ~ I "1 L , .---' -~ SOMERSET ~T . _ ~ n.--;-~~l.:~:"~ . \ ;; II -- "CCO~llmULTatjO 1~ 16~9 -~1 .1"':-, _~__CI l-~ ~ ~I 'f'5,r , i ~ 'J> 11l5' Z ,6 ,~_ ~:Haaie-a--l ~ "_~~:~, I J J ,tlwellings : m A.tta~.h d I I ~~ <'155' ---,, ~-=-A-1t.llklL -d' t---~J!~ ~s I --: qq.'"' L-..~_,_U -.....-, j I =-_ -C:;:.i. ~-~ ....-, ~J I Tgs 1lw] r I I L~'l: '" ,_ :. I I ~ !;--j "':.- --.: ~ t ...../.... "'..t.' ~l.. i. i- -1 '......' r.;). ~~llelll : I _;--..- :/ /'~~ ' -- \,' J r ,----' / .7' ,= I 1', ~ 11k"/ 'v I-- ----I I ____J ----1 ----, I --1 --I , I , , _J , ~ ----1 , '>-, : _ i"--=; ~-- I I .I ____J --, ,.I ~'i r 9 JV''''' '-'Ac I I -, ! ~l ,'i_ r\ll_, , \f - '1 -1,.-_1 ~_~.J' ,.__J I 70.5-1 I -"i-- 704, L L__l 69~---1 I ~9.1"""-'J-l ~""'l I.......' I ,""I --- I \--6"p , --~;? I I 66l ---'fj58 I I ---, ~ ~---""l t --, do , ------, I I , i'-.--1 , I : :....-,. I :~~J I I ~~"l ,_=' '-I ,--, I ---t>'l8J ~ -- ROYAL WA Y -.. Igbt . ~\-'~\\_~-\A I ~ hOD f}1 -;r.:/I:- d ___ L - {~/ji I I II-, 'lr ~'~ !.U !t,eIlWgs ^'!i fJl I -~-;! 7 I ~~___, ~ 1'~1 .J 1211 ..,1 J If ,~ "), \ l _ 52l ~ ~ ~y;;/,,/\ ""' -,-.-, (') \ ... ~ll 1 .0( \ <> \ -, '\ '---" ~ \ 1 ~ '~l--_~.lll-,\ r, --., \ w~ ~ r )J ( f.J 6Il2 6..........0 f 2: " ~ c: \ r---~LJ "I ~~ ~ -, \ ~ \ I ... __---, _ 0 _ \ I , v. r I r ____ --~._",-, r.- -~ .... I I \ 1 611 ,6O!i- _ "'" ~&-l, 1 I ~fV8 ~r I I l \ < ~ '; , __....~_ r- 1 .. I -'j m \,60$--1 I \L_:=:"r ';\ (1--' "~ I I" 1 !' ~ I' \ 6-- I , l-'.---.l ""8 \ '--- _~ 3l1E ~..... Existing Land Use Map Owner I Virglna Franks I Case Site 669 Bay Esplanade Property Size (Acres) PIN I A tIcs Page . ~\ f\!j! I!J\jj FLD2Q04-030 18 o 15acres OS/29/15/54756/077/0080 258A :1it", ,r~l ,J 1 I I I I LL.JL. J -, -, rlll')"i I 1"1 --- 1 --~-"l r-""Kp --~2 1 I -----tj58 1 1 ----I 1 --, -I 1 1 1 1 -~ ----, 1 ....."!.._J r--l -- 1 1 " -~-_.I' , Jo -----1 1 r"~-~ I I I...!"~ ---", 1 ~L 6f..J 1 ~ '1 1 c~ ) ,r -, r-I ---t>381 ROYAL WAY RIDS 6~;---1 .JJ F=-I 685 : ...r.....-r...,-..... I I I -----;> RFH ~ oq :! t 1LI ~ o Q, i I I II 1 J ,,'I "I J ~II :'11 ~ I l i ~ 1 r \ Future Land Use Map Owner I Vlrglna Franks Site Case 669 Bay Esplanade Property Size {Acres} PIN. I A tIcs Page . ^ f'JjI R I!/\!J WATER F LD2004-030 18 0.15acres OS/29/15/54756/077/0080 258A ~ S \ENGIN\I\UTOCAD\I\TLASI258A dwg 02113101 03 09 31 PM e '" OS/R CRt..:: $ Rn....,."""" .. C_I~! t -i~J" .. ~Ift~~ ~ ~iUf8"" ~~~ n!~ I ~ i;.G i~; ~~.~ ; Ii ~"\ ~ "u;.. '''''''':' .~t;I""I~~ · .. j' r:r:!'\--8':-":~YQJl<JllDO g : ~ ~,,: .." II ",,, ~=t; ": <:I''; "',..,,: '" ....;:...~ r'iIH ~ .:; ....i!l"'o;;~" ~ ......~8~ "':; ....M...:; '" :;;;..".... ~.. g!.~ B r..;E:,FuA ....a; '~_.,H ...... ~ ~~=..:s."",.l.I. ~.Il""" ....'!ll~~ ~,,'!l~ ...." ~~~ "II: ~r'l ::.. ~.. i'- : _t'"l:!l;::: or.. ~ 0 n '" ~ .... "':: "'~ .. - .. l ~Ii ~ Q '" ... ":! '" '" ~/j;ii! ..0; ~:'!l~~d ~"..~~c'IB'" ~..;:; "': :"0 "'L" :0.. L...:...... Ij ~U~ it I lIAlU).....y ~ - "'" MNtD........y "'I8fIJl: ~ ... ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~,t! .~ '.. ~ ~ ~S1"~~~ ~; "e~;~ ~..~t~~i~I-i!!yNoW~: l~:>~:?c: ~: i~..~~~I- ~:~ ~ :--.., n d · ~., _ " e' <1 ~ 9.-.iil'?'" ~ I ..t!..~ :'~r;.: f(D" .. .. _ .... ..~. t!c i 3 . ;g ;;1;1.. ~ i:!iI n W .. -::!(5 ~ ~ ~: I ~ ~ i! ~.. '" ~'I...i 0fIUCE"'" ~ ~ " :~l ~ e'" E ~~ \__!E111j! "~.."-:-12g .. ~ ;;;"J: ~~..-n I · .. ~ 2: 0 REP~TJRLK ::8Q.kQ 1 ;;;~ .. Q_ . I; .. -_. ... ..I.. ~ .:z:: T' -, ~ .. 0$.., ..- ""'...~, j" .. .. "'.. ~ Ji' ." - -< - ~ " '" ,I.. . - l:1('1"t.... ''''In''''~ 1:.oI~ .,... .......,.. ...... !tft '9~ 111''11:1'''...1 ;v 'IA F;IIiI ~ I~ g.o ~.. 4 ~ ~ ,:; ...... ''';; ..i!!-~ 1~ ~<.l ':1:t' ~.. .." ,,..-- .. ~ ~"L-- - 4~Q ld~ ~ T<:ig8~"~' 1oO~1 - G '~f:-.N\~" \~~iA; ~.. I ~ ~ I ~\ ~ ~8~~ He- ~ ~"" ... .. &l~ L ~ i.... 'f;;1. 1-_ O~.. ~'!\.1~ ~..... ~ ',- fewrtrYr- ! 00' ~t t i~iH~~:,: 2 ~! ; 's~:l ~<f.. ~r-i-':r- ~n. .............-;;- ~~';. - ~ - - I t= ~ ~ ~ .. ~ -a.. " - ~~:'~:-dI1~ ,~~IJ~ .: lo-li ~.. ~.. ~.. ~ ..1. ~~ ~:~~ ~ N 0'1 -...l CO .. tnlll :E I,N N.... 0 ~~ Z Il'llZ U; g C'> o I'T1Z )> -I Nr (J1)> (XlV) )> eng,n_5.merge po:;3 .. ~uIf 0{ J/;L ~ic,(S)- H. ~ IlD.Oo . 00-'1 ~~~ ~ Om~ ~~~ - - - - -~ - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - o,j ___ 01 o i ;;:: , OO~~ · ~ :::00 ~........... "~ --< ~ 8 ( - Y5 tW/r'-waicvr- ~ Jf ar-&f5Yr- $;'>A ,?#.li:> b.~- 9"~" ~)~t. I -----_n____________~ - \-l\~,,~ .... ~ 5 ; ~ ;, ~ .,. SSC;l 3: i' ~ @ l:::' . .. 'W hi e., ,--- := 0.:..1 .... rTJ C1 '" ~ Q ,. g~ n r '" rrl " --< <> :; ':l g z i!i z -< ~ -0" "" " "'" I:; - <:::' " M 0'" r " ,... <> ~ ~ ,.," ~ :;:: " z '" :s ~~ :; ~ C '" '" .., "' '" '" '" "' a " .... )>)> ,... '" ~ z '" " '" Z '" "'; a ,. "" f'l 8 is ~ z ~ ~ ~ z ~ z ';:i '" p "" ..., :; ~ ~ "" r ~ Vl ... ~ i~~H~[H W . ~ ;:.~~:.. [~.-.- f '" ~ i", :C[]~'<~~ a.~! . ... ..ji~~fh:~ ;; 2.. ~.~~g"Hq '" f: ~ Hii'!:l. ~ ~ '" ., II ~!;:~;! ~i:~ 0- n '" ~-. ~ '" EeZ ~!! ii' J -.,!i ~:- ~ ~[ii' ~;!'8 ... n ~~i~ ~ !.3"= ~ ~~;:.~ 1ii ... ~ [f;;]' ti :i"-;i:!, ::TJ: ~ ....~,..,. ~ ::l 0--( ~- i~~!! '!i;;;51 J~iIl: ~ Ec;~ ~..- J~~:r~I;!~ .~ -= .. dO nt.,!.. 0 a :;-: ~ - _l!!:"2~ lr-.p-~ (~l~~ 0 <> I ;8::~~~ f 8~n '" '" if[ 2,~ ~w = ^ ~~~~~i.~;3 ~ -;:~~E; ~-&; ti9: ~ ~s:.~; ~:.!~ ~,. .:i!:2!( J&j ~g ~c;-~~~ ~~ ~ i~1~: g::!;p -, to ..l f~" ~ s ~ '" '" iig,l~il:]:2 ~ '" . It: ::! i11l ...; '" ~ c i: :fi:'i~ ~:1:;: ~ ... t"'l = <l' ;:''-~Z' :;c -:u 0,.,., ~s "'~ :0-0 CO 02.,01 COMMUNITY IWVI~I Ofi!\'WNT CCJl}r 2 fhe use of the pJ.rcel ploposed fOl c1evel- opmen t does not lIlvolve <JOHn ,11 confine- ment fLlcllltles th., t are open to the out- side 3 Lot (1/ ('(I a!ld !lIIe! tli The I eductIon III lot ell eel and width wJ!1 not I eSlllt u. a uuJid- I ng wh l<..h IS out of scale with cXIstmg buddll1gs In the lmmC'dw.te vIcinity of the pal eel pi oposed fOI develop men t 4 Side alld I eell sctbac/~ ,\ The I cd udlOn 111 side audIO! J(',1I :,etback does not prevent access to the le.,r of any buildmg by emel- gpncy vehIcles b 'l'lw reductlOn 1I1 Side ,HIll/o[ I e,ll setback results 1I1 an !lnp! oved sIte plan, more effiCient parlung, or Im- Plovcd deSign ,md "ppear.lnce [mcl Inn!! sc,.ped a re,I'-, al e LIl excess 01 the llUnllJlUm lequlred i'j FI ont setback The reductlOl1 lH front ..,et- back lesuJts In dn unproved slte plan or Improved deSIgn and appear.u,te (01 d No 6526-00, ~ 1,6-15-00, Ord No 6680-01, ~ J, 4-5-01, Orrl No 6928-02, ~~ 15, 16, 5-2-02, 01(1 No 7 J 06-03, ~ 1, Q-18-0::l) DIVISION 8 TOURIST DISTRICT ("T") SectIOn 2-801. Intent and purpose. The mtent and purpose of the TOllllSt Dlstllct ("'1''') IS to plovlde a safe .Hld "ttractlvP tOllllst destlna tiOn 111 the City of Cle~u watcr \V Ith a full complement of tOUrist accommodatIOns nnrl con- venient dccess to goorls and C;el Vices SectIOn 2-801.1. MaXimum d(>velopmcnt po- tential. The ToUl 1St DIstrict ("'1''') J1l.1y he Im..flled In mOl e th.m one land use c.ltegOl y [t IS the 1I1 tent of the '1' Dlstnct tha t develoJlment be con slstellt with the CountYWIde Futu re Land Use Plan as I eq lurcd by state law The develop men t poten tral of a palcd of land wlthlll the T Dlstl let ...11,dl be determllled by the st,mdards fOLlnnll1 thiS Devel- opment Code :1<; well ,1S the Countywide Future Land Use Dpc;lgn<ltlOll of the pi opel ty F'0l I ho<..,p pal cels wlthll1 the T Dl<,tllc.t th,lt h.lye em ,[1 P'\ wlthll1 the bounclm les of ,H,d gOVf:1 ned by ,l. "p<>- ual e1l8<"1 pt.n approved by the CIty Comml..,<;lon and the CountywIde PJ"nl11og Author Ity, 1ll,l'{I- Illll m development potentlZlJ shall be a::, set fOI th for each cbssdiutlOl1 of use and locatIOn 10 tbe [lpproved plan Development potentia! for the CountywIde FutUle Land Use Deslgn.1Ltons th..t [lpply to the T Dlstllct are :lS follows ) I lOr" '''''flll ('OUIII\fP,dt) flll/tUe ,"III \ IIItl/1II nll."!I,,,>:" (lilli, 1"1,,, '''' III Ii I' hUH ,\" (I Nn /", I IIr'(JlIIlIJr)d(//IfIli~ I." ",! f l'l' /)(" 1.;11" 11011 /'1'1 1Ir,,' of f,n 11I1 [III P('I "'10'" ,<,,,, (enl' aolw (llllh I!lI lu(' I (('~Ol t F,l( ,I,I ".~ 111~h 10 dWl'I' m: \l1l1t<. ]"'1' ,J( r(' I";\I{ 1 ll/J:-'I{ <)') ~O tll"I.-. Jll I ,I{ l{ (Old No 6526-00, ~ 1,6-15-00, Old No 6680-0], ~ 7,/1-5-011 S~'dlOn ~-HO~ FI('Aible standard develop- ment. l'he (ollowlng uses 3l e LevpI One pE'l nllttpcl I I '-,("<., I II LllP '[' Dl::.tI Ict su bJec.t to the Sb.ncl.11 r]& ,\lId (I If C 11.1 'oct out 1H tlll s sectJoll "nel othel appllc 1- b1e pl ()V 10, lon'o of i\l tlele 3 ~ d I) I ~ \.;' fl t I Post-It'" Fax Note To 7671 Dale Co Phone # Phone # Fax # Fax # C02 Gt~ - ~-..-.! ZONING DISTRICTS ~ 2-802 Thble 2-802 "T" Dlstnct FleXible Standard Development Standards Mm Lot Mm Lot Max. Area Width Height Mm Setbacks Mm. Off-Street Use (sq ft.) (ft.) (ft. ) (ft.) Density Parkmg Front Side Rear Accessory Dwellings nla nla wa wa nla nla 30 units! lJurnt acre Alcoholic Beverage Sales 5,000 50 35 10-15 10 20 nia 5 per 1,000 GFA Attached Dwellmgs 10,000 100 35-50 10-15 10 10-20 30 Uill ts! 1 5 per umt acre Govemmental Uses(1) 10,000 100 35-50 10-15 o-IO 10-20 nla 3--411,000 GFA Indoor Recreabon1Entertmn- 5,000 50 35-100 o-I5 0-10 20 nla 10 per I,OOO GFA went Med1cal ClmlC 10,000 100 30--50 10-15 10 20 20 2--311,000 GFA Nightclubs 5,000 50 35 15 10 20 nla 10 per 1,000 GFA Non-Resldenbal Off-Street nia nia nla 25 5 10 nla nia Parkmg Offices 10,000 100 35-50 10-15 0-10 10-20 nla 3----4 spaces per 1,000 GFA 25 spaces per 1,000 sq ft of lot area or Outdoor Recreabon/Enter- as determmed by 5,000 50 35 10-15 10 20 nla the community de- tamment velopment drrector based on lTE Man- ual standards Ovenught Accommodabons 20,000 100-150 35-50 10-15 0-10 10-20 40 roomsl 1 per Ulllt acre ParkIng Garages and Lots 20,000 100 50 15-25 10 10--20 nla nla 1 per 20,000 SF land area or as de- Parka and Recreation Fac1h- termmed by the nla nla 50 25 10 20 nla community develop- bes ment coordInator based on lTE Man- ual standards PublIc Transportation Faclh- nla nia 10 nia nla nJa nla nia bes(2) Sidewalk Vendors nla nla n1a rJa nla Dia nla nia Restaurants 5,000- 50-100 25-35 Io-15 0-10 10-20 nla 7-15 spaces per 10,000 1,000 GFA RetaIl Sales and Semces 5,000- 50-100 35-50 10-15 0-10 10-20 nla 4------5 spaces per 10,000 1,000 GFA Socml and Comwumty Center 5,000- 50-100 35-50 Io-15 0-10 10-20 Dia 4------5 spaces per 10,000 I,OOO GFA UtlhtylInfrastrocture Faclh- nia nla nla 25 10 10 nia nla bes(3) Supp No 6 CD2 65 ~ 2-802 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE (1) Governmental uses shall not exceed five acres Any such use, alone or when added to contIguous like uses which exceed five acres shall reqUlre a land use plan map amendment to InstItutIonal whIch shall mclude such uses and all contIguous like uses (2) Pubhc transportatIOn facilItIes shall not exceed three acres Any such use, alone or when added to contIguous lIke uses whIch exceed three acres shall reqUIre a land use plan map amendment to TransportatIOn/Utlhty WhlCh shall mclude such uses and all contIguous hke uses (3) UblIty/mfrastructure uses shall not exceed three acres Any such use, alone or when added to contlguous hl..e uses whIch exceed three acres shall reqUIre a land use plan map amendment to TransportatlOn/Utlllty whIch shall mclude such uses and all contIguous lIke uses Flexibility criteria: A Alcoholtc beverage sales 1 Locatwn a The parcel proposed for development IS not contlguous to a parcel of land whIch IS deslgnated as resIdentIal m the Zornng Atlas, b The use of the parcel proposed for development WIll not lllvolve drrect access to a major artenal street, c The deSIgn of all buIldmgs comphes With the '!bunst DlStnct deSIgn gUIde- !mes III DIVlSlon 5 of ArtIcle 3 2 Front setback: a The reductIOn m front setback con- tnbutes to a more actIve and dy- naImc street hfe, b The reductIon lD front setback re- sults 10 an Improved Slte plan or Improved deSIgn or appearance B Attached dwellmgs 1 Hetght a The mcreased heIght results m an Improved SIte plan or Improved de- SIgn and appearance, 2 The mcreased heIght IS necessary to allow the Improvement of off-street parkmg on the ground floor of the resIdentIal bUlldmg Parkmg Off-street parkmg wIthm the footpnnt of the resldenttal bmldmg 15 deSigned and constructed to create a street level facade comparable to the archltec- b Supp No 6 CD2 66 ....,. tural character and fimshes of a resIden- tJ.al bUlldmg WIthout parlong on the ground level, 3 Locatwn' The use of the parcel proposed for development will not Involve dIrect access to a major artenal street, 4 Setbacks a The reductlon In front setback con- tnbutes to a more arnve and dy- nanuc street hfe, b The reducbon In front setback re- sults m an rmproved site plan or improved deSign and appearance, c. The reductIon m rear setback does not prevent access to the rear of any bmldmg by emergency vehIcles, d The reductJ.on in rear setback re- sults In an Improved SIte plan, more effiCIent parking or Improved deSIgn and appearance, e The reductIOn 10 rear setback does not reduce the amount oflandscaped area otherwise reqUITed 5 The deSIgn of all bUlldmgs complies WIth the Thunst DIstnct deSIgn gw.debnes m DiVlSlOn 5 of ArtIcle 3 ~ C Governmental uses 1 Hetght The mcreased heIght results III an lmproved sIte plan or Improved deSign and appearance, 2 Stgns No SIgn of any kmd IS deSIgned or located so that any portIOn of the SIgn 15 more than SIX feet above the fimshed grade of the front lot hne of the parcel ZONING DISTRICTS ~ 2-802 proposed for development unless such D Indoor recreatwn I en tertamment sign age IS a part of an approved compre- 1 The deSIgn of all bU1ldings comphes wIth henSlve SIgn program, the Tourist Thstnct deSIgn gmdehnes m 3 Locatwn The use of the parcel proposed DIVISion 5 of Article 3. for development will not Involve dIrect 2 Setbacks access to a major artenal street; The reduction In front setback con- a 4 Setbacks tnbutes to a more actIve and dy- a The reductlOn ill front setback con- narmc street hfe; tributes to a more actIve and dy- b The reduction m front setback re- namlC street hfe; suIts m an unproved deSign and ap- b The reduction In front setback re- pearance; solts ill an Improved Site plan or c The reductIOn m sIde setback. does Improved deSIgn and appearance, not prevent access to the rear of any c The reductIon In side and rear set- bU1lding by emergency velucles; back does not prevent access to the d. Tbe reductIon ill Side setback results rear of any bwldmg by emergency In an improved Site plan, more effi- vehicles, Clent parkIng or unproved deSign d The reductton In side and rear set- and appearance back results III an Improved Site plan, e The reduchon in Side setback results more effiCient parkmg or Improved In landscaped areas III excess of the "'<::';;:~H-"j deSign and appearance; IIlIDlD1um reqwred e The reductIon In SIde and rear set- 3. ReLght Tbe increased height results in an back does not reduce the amount of unproved site plan or unproved deSign landscaped area othel'Wlse reqwred. and appearance. 5 Offstreet parkmg E MedLcal clmre a Adequate parkmg IS available on a 1. The use of the parcel proposed for devel- shared baSIS as detenmned by all opment 18 compatIble WIth surrounchng eXIstmg land uses WIthIn 1,000 feet properlles of parcel proposed for development, or parkIng IS available through any 2 Off-street parkmg' exIStmg or planned and conumtted a Adequate parking IS available on a parkmg faclIttIes or the shared park- shared baSIS as determmed by all mg formula In Article 2, D1Vlslon 14, eXlstmg land uses WIthm 1,000 feet b The phYSical charactenstIcs of a pro- of the parcel proposed for develop- posed bU1ldmg are such that the ment, or parking IS available through lIkely uses of the property WIll re- any eXIstmg or planned and commIt- qwred fewer parkmg spaces per floor ted parkIng faCIhtIes or the shared area than otherwise required or that parkmg formula in ArtIcle 2, DIVl- the use of sIgruficant portIOns of the sian 14, bUlldmg will be used for storage or b The phYSIcal charactenstIcs of a pro- other non-parkmg demand-generat- posed bUlldmg are such that the mg purposes. lIkely uses of the property Will re- 6 The deSign of all bUlldmgs complies WIth qUIre fewer parkIng spaces per floor the Tounst DIStnCt deSIgn gUIdelmes m area than otherwIse reqUIred or that DIVISion 5 of Article 3 the use of Significant portIOns of the Supp No 6 CD2 67 ~ 2-802 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE buIldmg wIll be used for storage or other non-parkmg demand-generat- mg purposes 3. Front setback a The reductIOn In front setback con- tributes to a more active and dy- narmc street hIe; b The reductIOn In front setback re- sults m an Improved Slte plan or rmproved desIgn and appearance 4 Helght The Increased heIght results In an improved site plan Or Improved deSIgn or appearance F. Nlghtclubs L Locatwn a The parcel proposed for development IS not contiguous to a parcel of land whIch IS deSIgnated as resldentIal m the Zomng Atlas, b. The use of the parcel proposed for development will not Involve dIrect access to a major artenal street; The deSIgn of all bmldings complies with the 'lbunst DIstnct deSign gUIdehnes In DIVIsion 5 of ArtIcle 3 2 G Non-resLdentwl off-street parkmg 1 The parcel proposed for development IS contiguous to the parcel on whIch the non-resIdentIal use wh:1ch will be served by the off-street parking spaces, 18 located and has a common boundary of at least 25 feet, or the parcel proposed for develop- ment IS located Immediately across a pub- hc road :from the nOll-residentIal use whIch will be served by the off-street parlung spaces, prOVIded that access to the off- street park.mg does not mvolve the use of local streets wluch have reSidential UOlts on both Sides of the street 2. No off-street parkmg spaces are located 10 the reqUIred front setback for detached dwellmgs In the T DIstnct or wlthm ten feet, whlchever IS greater, or WithIn (10) feet of a SIde or rear lot bne, except along the common boundary of the parcel pro- 8upp No 6 CD2 68 posed for development and the parcel on wluch the non.resIdenttal use whIch WIll be served by the off~street parlung spaces 3 Off-street parking spaces are screened by a wall or fence of at least four feet 10 helght winch IS landscaped on the exter- nal SIde With a contmuous hedge or non- deCIduous vine 4 All outdoor ltghtmg IS automatIcally SWItched to turn off at 9 00 P m. 5 All parkmg spaces shall be surface park- mg 6 The deSign of all bUIldIngs compIles WIth the Tounst Thstnct deSign guidehnes m DIVISion 5 of ArtIcle 3 H Offiees. 1 The use of the parcel proposed for devel- opment fronts on but will not mvolve dIrect access to a major artenal street, 2. All slgnage IS a part of the comprehensive Sign program, ~ The design of all bUIldmgs comphes wlth the Tounst Dlstnct deSIgn gw.dehnes In Article 3 DIviSIOn 5. 4 Setbacks 3 a The reductlOn III front setback con- tnhutes to a more actlve and dy. naIDlC streetlIfe; b The reductIon In front setback re- sults In an rmproved site plan or lmproved deSIgn and appearance, c The reductlOn m Side and rear set- backs does not prevent access to the rear of any bmldmg by emergency vehlcles, d The reductlOn 10 SIde and rear set- backs results 10 an Improved site plan, more efficlent parlung or Im- proved deSign and appearance, e The reductIOn m SIde and rear set- backs results In landscaped areas III excess of the mIlllmum reqUIred ZONING DISTRICTS ~ 2-802 5 Off-street parkmg. 6. Front setback a. Adequate parking IS avaliable on a a. The reduction m front setback con- shared basIs as detennmed by all tnbutes to a more active dynamtc eXlstIng land uses withm 1,000 feet street hfe, of parcel proposed for development, b The reduction 10 front setback re- or parkmg IS avaliable through any suIts 10 an lmproved SIte plan or eXlstmg or planned and comrmtted park1ng facilities or the shared park- Improved deSIgn and appearance 109 formula In ArtIcle 2, DIVlsIon 14, 7. Off-street parkmg b The phYSICal cbaractenstIcs of a pro- a. Adequate parkIng IS avaliable on a posed building are such that the shared baSIS as deternuned by all hkely uses of the property will re- eXlStmg land uses WIthIn 1,000 feet qwre fewer parkIng spaces per floor of the parcel proposed for develop- area than othel'WlSe requU'ed or that ment, or parking is available through the use of SIgnificant portions of the any existIng or planned and COmmIt- bwldmg will be used for storage or ted parkmg facIhtIes or the shared other non-parking demand-generat- parking formula In ArtIcle 2, DIVl- mg purposes. swn 14; or 6 Hezght. The Increased beight results m an b. The phYSIcal cbaractenstIcs of a pro- improved SIte plan or rmproved deSIgn posed buIlding are such that the and appearance. hkely uses of the property will re- ....""Rt~~ ",.,. I Outdoor recreatLOn I entertainment. quU'e fewer parkIng spaces per floor area than othelWlse required or that L The parcel proposed for development IS the use of sIgmficant portions of the not contiguous to a parcel ofland wluch IS buIlding are used for storage or other designated as resIdentIal in the Zomng non-parkIng demand-generating pur- Atlas, poses. 2 All signage IS a part of a comprehensIve J. Overmght accommodatwns sign program, 1 Locatwn The use of the parcel proposed 3 Sound ampWicatlOn 15 designed and con- for development will not Involve dU'ect structed to ensure that no ampWied sound access to a major artenal street, can be heard to the extent that the sound 2. Hezght Tbe10creased heIght results 10 an 15 recognIzable In terms of tbe meamng of improved SIte plan and/or Improved de- words or melody when WInd condItIons SIgn and appearance, are less than ten nnles per hour at a dIstance of more than 100 feet In all 3 Szgns' No SIgn of any lond IS deSIgned or dIrectIOns or when WInd condItions are located so that any portIon of the sign IS ten mIles per hour or greater at a distance more than su: feet above the fimshed of more than 150 feet 10 all dIrectIons, grade of the front lot hne of the parcel All outdoor Ilght10g IS deSIgned and con- proposed for development unless such 4 slgnage IS a part of an approved compre- structed so that no hght falls dll'ectlyon hensIVe SIgn program, land other than the parcel proposed for development, 4 Setbacks. 5 The deSIgn of all bUIldings compiles With a. The reductIOn ill front setback con- the Tonnst DIstnct deSign gwdehnes ill tnbutes to a more actIve and dy- DlVlSlon 5 of ArtIcle 3 nanuc street hfe, Supp No 6 CD2 69 ~ 2-802 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE The reductIon In front setback re- sults in an Improved sIte plan or lmproved desIgn and appearance, The reductiOn In side and rear set- backs does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emergency vehIcles, The reG.uctlOn In sIde and rear set- backs results III an rmproved site plan, more efficIent parkIng or Im- proved desIgn and appearance; The reductIon In sIde and rear set. backs does not reduce the amount of landscaped area otherwIse reqUJred. 5. The deSign of all buIldmgs complIes Wlth the '!bunst Distnct deSIgn gwdellOes 10 DIVlslOn 5 of ArtIcle 3 Lot w~dth The reductlon mlot Wldth WIll not result m a butldmg whtch IS out of scale WIth eXlstIng bwldmgs In the imme- dIate VlClDlty of the parcel proposed for development K. Parkmg garages and lots 1 The parcel proposed for development IS not contIguous to land deSignated as res- Idenbalm the Zomng Atlas; Access to and from the parkmg garage or lot shall be based on the findmgs of a transportatlon analysIs approved by the CIty, The stackmg spaces avatlable for cars waltmg to pass through a parlung tIcket dispensable or booth to enter the garage or lot shall be based on the deslgn and sIze of the garage or lo~" Any frontage along a pubhc street IS land- scaped or deSIgned to be sumlar m char- acter and use to other uses frontmg on each street for a dIstance of 250 feet In elther dIrectIOn along the street or the nearest mtersectlOns, wluchever IS less, 5. ParkIng structures are deSIgned, con- structed and fimshed so that the struc- ture of the garage IS archItecturally com- patlble the deSIgn and character of adJ acent pnnclpal uses, b c d e 6 2 3 4 Supp NQ 6 CD2 70 6 There IS an unmet eXistIng demand for addItIOnal parkIng III the nnmedmte VI- ........ cuuty of the parcel proposed for develop- ment, 7 ConstructIon of a parkIng structure would not otherwise be phYSIcally feaSIble, 8 The front and rear setbacks wluch are proVIded are Improved as an arcade or WIth other active pedestnanlcommerClal areas for SIdewalk cafes, sidewalk ven- dors, street furniture or urban amenities; 9 The design of all bwldings comphes with the '!bunst Distnct deSIgn guIdelines In DiVISion 5 of ArtIcle 3. 10 Front setback. a. The reductJ.on In front setback con- tnbutes to a more actIve dynanuc street life; b. The reduction In front setback re- sults In an improved site plan or Improved deSIgn. and ~ppearance ~ 11 Rear setback: a. The reduction in rear setback. does not prevent access to the rear of any bwldmg by emergency vehtcles, b The reduction In rear setback r& sults m an rmproved Slte plan, more effiCient parkIng or rmproved design and appearance, c. The reducnon III rear setback re- sults In landscapll1g in excess of the mlmmum requIred L Parks and recreatwn facthttes. 1 Tbe proposed use IS compatible wlth the sUITOUndlOg propertIes. 2 Off-street parking 18 screened from adJa- cent parcels of land and any street by a landscaped wallar fence of at least four feet III heIght 3 All outdoor lIghtIng IS deSigned so that no light fixtures cast hght directly on adJa- cent land used for resldentlal proposes 4 Off-street parkIng Adequate parkIng 18 avaIlable on a shared baSIS as deternnned ~ 2-802 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE 2 out of scale WIth eXlStmg bUlldmgs ill the munernate VlCInIty of the parcel proposed for development; Locatwn The use of the parcel proposed for development will not Involve drrect access to a major artenal street, Helght The mcreased height results In an unproved Sltt'! plan or Improved desIgn and appearance; Setbacks a The reductIOn In front setback con- tnbutes to a more actIve and dy- namIC street lIfe, b The reductIOn ill front setback re- sults 10 an unproved site plan or unproved desIgn and appearance; c The reductIon In sIde and rear set- backs does not prevent access to the rear of any buIldmg by emergency vehIcles; d The reductIOn In sIde and rear set- backs results m an Improved sIte plan, more efficIent parkmg or rm- proved deSIgn and appearance, e The reductIon In SIde and rear set- backs does not reduce the amount of landscaped area otherwIse reqwred, Off-street parkmg a The phYSICal charactenstIcs of a pro- posed bwlding are such that the ltkely uses of the property will re- qwre fewer parking spaces per floor area than othertvlse reqUired or that the use of sIgmficant portIOns of the buddmg WIll ae used for storage or other non-par lung demand-generat4 mg purposes, b Adjacent land uses are of a nature that there IS a mgh probabIlIty that patrons WIll use modes of transpor- tabon other than the automoblle to access the use, c Adequate parkIng IS avmlable on a shared baSIS as determmed by all eXIstmg land uses Wlthm 1,000 feet of the parcel proposed for develop- 3 4 5 Supp No 6 roent, or parkIng 15 avaIlable through any eXlstmg or planned and COmmlt- ted parkmg facilitIes or the shared parkmg formula III Article 2, DIVI- SIOn 14 6 The desIgn of all buIldmgs complIes with the Tounst DlStnCt deSign gwdelines m DIVIsion 5 of ArtIcle 3 p_ Stdewalk vendors 1 The locatIon of the SIdewalk vendor does not rmpall' pedestnan movement 2 The land occupIed by a SIdewalk vendor IS not deSIgnated or used for requll'ed off- street parkmg Q_ Soczal and commumty center 1 The parcel proposed for development does not abut any property d8S1gnated as res- Idenbalm the Zomng Atlas 2 Front setback The reduction in front set- back results In an unproved SIte plan or unproved desIgn and appearance. 3 Szde and rear setback The reduction In SIde and/or rear setback IS necessary to preserve protected trees and/or results In an Improved site plan or more efficient deSIgn and appearance and results in landscapmg In excess of the mllumum reqwred R Utlltty I znfrastructure faczlztzes 1 Any above ground structure other than penmtted telecommumcation towers and utIhty dIstrIbutIon lmes located on or along a rear lot line shall be screened from VIew by a landscaped opaque wall or fence wmch IS at least tw04thIrds the heIght of the above ground structure and shall be landscaped WIth trees whIch five years after mstallatlOu substanbally wtll obscure the fence or wall and the above ground structure, 2 The deSIgn of all bmldmgs comphes WIth the Tounst DIStnCt deSIgn gwdelInes m DIVISiOn 5 of Artlcle 3 (Ord No 6526*00,91,6-15-00, Ord No 6928-02, 99 17-20, 5-2-02) ~ CD272 ZONING DISTRICTS {i 2.803 Section 2.803. Flexible development. The followmg uses are Level 'I'wo penmtted uses pernutted 10 the Tounst "T" Dlstnct subject to the standards and cnteria set out m tlus sectton and other apphcable proVIsIOns of ArtIcle 3 Table 2 803 "T" Flextble Deuelopment Standards Mtn Lot Mm Lot Max. Mtn Mm Area Width HeIght Front Mm Sfde Rear Mln Off-Street Use (sq ft) (ft ) (ft ) (ft ) (ft ) (ft ) Denstty ParkIng AlcoholIc Beverage Sales 5,000 50 35-100 0-15 0-10 10-20 nla 5 per 1,000 GFA Attached Dwellmga 5,000- 50-1.00 35---100 0---15 0--10 10-20 30 umtsl 1 5 per Wllt 10,000 acre Deternllned hy the 30 Ullltsl communIty devel. ComprehensIve Infill acre, 40 opment coordmator nla nla nla nla nla nla based on the spe- Redevelopment ProJect(l) rooms! Clfic use andlor acre ITE Manual stan- dards Luw.ted Velude Sales and 5,000 50 35---100 0--15 0-10 10-20 nla 4--5 spaces per Dtsplay 1,000 GFA Marma Faohtles 5,000 50 25 10-15 0-10 10-20 Dla 1 space per 2 sbps Nightclubs 5,000 50 35---100 0-15 0-10 10-20 nla 10 per 1,000 GFA Offices 10,000 100 35---100 0-15 0-10 10-20 nla 3---4 spaces per 1,000 GFA 2 5 spaces per 1,000 SQ IT of lot area or as deter- Outdoor RecreatlonlEnter- 5,000 50 35 5-15 0-10 10-20 nla IIlllled by the com- tamment mumty develop- ment coordmator based on ITE Man- ual standards Overmght Accommodatwns 10,000- 100-150 35---100 0-15 0-10 0-20 40 rooms/ I per Ulllt 20,000 acre Reataurants 5,000- 50-100 25---IOO 0-15 0-10 10-20 nla 7-15 spaces per 10,000 1,000 GFA Rewl sales and services 5,000- 50-100 a5-IOO 0--15 0-10 10-20 nla 4-5 spaces per 10,000 1,000 GFA (1) Any use approved for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project shall be pernutted by the underlymg Future Land Use Plan Map deSignation 1 Location: a_ The parcel proposed for development IS not contIguous to a parcel of land whIch IS deSIgnated as resldentmllll the Zomng Atlas, 2 The use of the parcel proposed for development WIll not 1Ovolve duect access to a major artenal street, Hetght The Increased helght results In an Improved SIte plan and/or unproved de- SIgn and appearance, Flexibility criteria: A Alcoholw beverage sales b 3 Stgns No SIgn of any land IS deSIgned or located so that any portIOn of the SIgn IS Supp No 6 CD2 73 ~ 2-803 COMMUNITY DEVEI>.OPMENT CODE more than SIX feet above the fimshed grade of the front lot hne of the parcel proposed for development unless the SIgn IS a part of a comprehenslve SIgn pro~ gram, 4 Setbacks a The reductIOn In front setback con- tnbutes to a more actIve and dy- nanuc street hfe, b The reduchon In front setback re- sults In an Improved SIte plan or Improved deSIgn and appearance, C The reductIOn In SIde and rear set~ back does not prevent access to the rear of any brnldIng by emergency vehicles, q The reductlOn In sIde and rear set- a back results 10 an unproved site plan, more effiCient park10g or lmproved deSign and appearance, 5 The design of all bUIldmgs comphes With the Tounst DIStrict deSign gUIdehnes m DIVIsion 5 of Arhcle 3. B Attached dwelltngs. 1 Lot area and wtdth The reduchon ill lot area mIl not result In a bUIldmg wh1ch IS out of scale With eXIShng bUIldmgs In the ImmedIate Vlcilllty of the parcel proposed for development, 2 LocatIOn The use of the parcel proposed for development win not Involve dIrect access to an artenal street, 3 Hetght a. The mcrensed helght results In an Improved site plan or Improved de- SIgn and appearance, h The mcreased height IS necessary to allow the unprovement of off-street parkIng on the ground floor of the reSidentIal bUIldmg, Setbacks 4 a The reductIOn III front setback con- tnhutes to a more actIve and dy- namIC street hfe, Bupp No 6 CD2 74 b. The reduction III front setback re- sults III an Improved site plan or Improved deSIgn and appearance, c The reduction In sIde and rear set- back does not prevent access to the rear of any bUlldmg by emergency vehIcles, d The reductIOn ill Side and rear set- back results In an Improved Site plan, more effiCIent parkmg or Improved deSIgn and appearance, --- Off-street parkmg: a. The phYSIcal charactenstics of a pro. posed buIldmg are such that the hkely uses of the property Wlll re- quae fewer parlung spaces per floor area than otherwIse required or that the use of sIgmficant portions of the bwldmg for storage or other non- parking demand-generatIng purposes or that the nature of the mdiVldual dwelhng UnIts and their locahon IS lIkely to lead to dependency on non- automobile modes of transportatton, b Off-street parkmg Wlth1n the foot- pnnt of the reSIdentIal bwldmg IS deSIgned and constructed to create a street level facade comparable to the arcmtectural character and fimshes of a reSidentIal bwldmg Without park- mg on the ground level. 6 The design of all bUIldmgs complies Wlth the Tounst Dlstnct deSIgn gUIdebnes In DIVlsIon 5 of Arhcle 3 5 C Comprehenswe mfill redevelopment projects 1 The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development IS other- W1se ImpractIcal WIthout deVIattons from the use, mtensIty and development stan- dards, 2 The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehenslve mfill redevelopment project Will not reduce the faIr market value of abuthng propertIes, ZONING DISTRICTS ~ 2-803 3 The uses withm the comprehensIve milll 3 No velucIe semce shall be proVIded on redevelopment project are otherwise per- the parcel proposed for development mltted In the CIty of Clearwater, E Manna facLlttteS 4 The uses or mix of uses within the caro- l The parcel proposed for development IS prehenslve mfiII redevelopment project not located ill areas Identrlied m the Com. are compatIble With adjacent land uses, prehensIve Plan as areas of enVIronmen- 5 SUltable SIteS for development or redevel- tal sIgmficance mcIudmg opment of the uses or IDlX of uses wltlun a. The north end of Clearwater Beach, the comprehensive mfill redevelopment b Clearwater Harbor grass beds; project are not otherwIse avm.1able m the CIty of Clearwater; c Cooper's Point, 6_ The development of the parcel proposed d Clearwater Harbor spoulslands, for development as a comprehensIve mfill e Sand Key Park. redevelopment project wIll upgrade the f The southern edge of Alhgator Lake_ IIDmedIate VICInity of the parcel proposed 2 No commercJ.al activitIes other than the for development, moonng of boats on a rental basis shall be 7 The design of the proposed comprehen- perDlltted on any parcel of land wluch IS sIve in:fill redevelopment project creates a contiguous to a parcel of land which IS form and functIon wluch enhances the desIgnated as resIdentIal m the Zomng commumty character of the Immediate Atlas, unless the marina facility 18 totally VIClOlty of the parcel proposed for devel- screened from VIew from the contlguous opment and the City of Clearwater as a land which IS designated as residential whole; and the hours ofaperatlon of the cammer. 8 Flexibility in regard to lot Width, reqUll'Eld CIa! actiVItIes are lImIted to the tIme pe- setbacks, heIght and off-street parkIng nod between sunnse and sunset, are Justrlied by the benefits to commumty 3 Setbacks character and the Immediate VICinIty of a The reduction in front setback con- the parcel proposed for development and tnbutes to a more actIve and dy- the CIty of Clearwater as a whole, nannc street hfe, 9 Adequate off-street parkIng m the unme- b. The reduction in front setback re- dIate VlCUUty aceordmg to the shared park- suIts in an unproved Site plan or ing formula III DiviSIOn 14 of A.rtt.cle 3 WIll unproved deSign and appearance, be avatlable to aVOId on-street parkmg in c The reduction m SIde and rear set- the immedIate viClmty of the parcel pro- back does not prevent access to the posed for development, rear of any bUlldmg by emergency 10 The deSIgn of all bUlldmgs complIes With vehtcles, the Tounst Dlstnct deSIgn gUldelmes m d The reductIOn ill SIde and rear set- Dlvislon 5 of Article 3 back results In an Improved site plan, Ltm~ted vehl-Cle sales and dlsplay more efficlent parkmg or unproved D deSIgn and appearance 1 The use of the parcel proposed for devel- 4 The design of all bUlldmgs comphes WIth opment shall be located In an enclosed the Tounst Dlstnct deSign guldehnes III structure DIVISIOn 5 of ArtIcle 3 2 The use of the parcel proposed for devel- 5 All manna faCIlItIes shall comply with the opment shall have no outdoor dIsplays commercIal dock requirements set forth Supp No 6 CD2 75 g 2-803 CO:MMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE III SectIon 3-601 C 3 and the manna and 2. Stgns No Sign of any kmd IS deSigned or manna facilities reqll1rements set forth m located so that any portIOn of the SIgn IS SectIOn 3-603 more than SIX feet above the fimshed F Nlghtclubs grade of the front lot line of the parcel proposed for development unless such 1 Locatwn slgnage IS a part of an approved com pre- a The parcel proposed for development henslve Sign program, IS not CC'ltIguous to a parcel of land 3 Locatwn The use of the parcel proposed whIch IS deSignated as resIdentIal In for development will not mvolve dIrect the Zonmg Atlas, access to a major artenal street, b The use of the parcel proposed for 4 Setbacks development WIll not mvolve dIrect a The reductIOn ill front setback con- access to a major artenal street, tnbutes to a more acb.ve and dy- 2 Helght The Increased height results In an namlC street hfe; Improved Site plan andlor Improved de- b. The reductIon m front setback re- Sign and appearance; suIts m an unproved site plan or 3 Slgns No Sign of any k10d IS deSigned or Improved deSign and appearance, located so that any portIon of the Sign IS c. The reducbon ill side and rear set- more than SIX feet above the finished back does not prevent access to the grade of the front lot hne of the parcel rear of any bullding by emergency proposed for development unless the SIgn velucles, IS a part of a comprehensIve Sign pro- d. The reduction In sme and rear set- gram, back results 10 an improved Site plan, 4 Setbacks more effiCient parkmg or rmproved a. The reduct10n 10 front setback con- design and appearance, tnbutes to a more active and dy- 5 Off-street parkmg nannc street hfe, The reduction 10 front setback re- a The phYSICal charactenstIcs of a pro- b posed butldmg are such that the suits In an Improved Slte plan or likely uses of the property Will re- Improved deSIgn and appearance, qUITe fewer parkmg spaces per floor c The reductIOn m Side and rear set- area than othel"Wlse reqUITed or that back does not prevent access to the the use of Significant portIons of the rear of any bUIldmg by emergency bUIldmg wtll be used for storage or vehicles, other non-parkmg demancl-generat- d. The reductIOn 10 SIde and rear set- 109 purposes, back results m an Improved SIte plan, b Adequate parktng IS avaIlable on a more effiCIent parlung or Improved shared baSIS as detenmned by all deslgn and appearance, eXIstmg land uses wlthm 1,000 feet 5 The deslgn of all bUildmgs compILes With of the parcel proposed for develop- the Tounst Dlstnct deSign gUIdelInes m roent, or parkmg IS aVallable through DIVlslOn 5 of Article 3 eXIstmg or planned and commItted park10g faCIlities or the shared park- G Offices mg formula 10 ArtIcle 3, D1VlSlOll 14 1 Hetght The mcreased height results III an 6 The deSIgn of all bmldlllgs complies WIth Improved SIte plan or Improved deSIgn the Tounst Dlstnct deSIgn gUIdehnes 10 and appearance, DlvIslon 5 of Arttcle 3 Supp No 6 CD276 ZONING DISTRICTS ~ 2-803 H Outdoor recreatwn I entertamment or planned and comlmtted parkIng faclli. The parcel proposed for development IS tIes or the shared parkIng formula In 1. ArtIcle 3, DIV1slOn 14 not conbguous to a parcel ofland whIch IS deSignated as resIdential m the Zonmg I Overmght accommodatwns. Atlas, 1 Locatton The use of the parcel proposed 2. All slgnage IS a part of a comprehensive for development will not mvolve mect Sign program, access to an artenal street; 3 Sound ampltficatton IS deSIgned and con- 2. Hetght The increased height results in an structed to ensure that no amphfied sound Improved Site plan and/or improved de- can be heard to the extent that the sound SIgn and appearance; IS recogrozable In mearung of or Identity 3 Szgns: No Sign of any kind is deSigned or of a melody when wmd condttions are less located so that any pomon of the sign 18 than ten nules per hour at a dIstance of more than SIX feet above the finished more than 100 feet In all d1rections or grade of the front lot line of the parcel when wmd condittons are ten mtles per hour or grater at a wstance of more than proposed for development unless such slgnage 15 a part of an approved compre- 150 feet ill all duecttons, hensive Sign program; 4 All outdoor lighting is deSIgned and con. 4 Setbacks' structed so that no light falls dtrectly on land other than the parcel proposed for a The reductton in front setback con- development, tnbutes to a more active and dy. namtc street lue, 5 Setbacks The reductIon In front setback re- b a The reductlOn 10 front setback con- sults In an Improved site plan or tnbutes to a more acttve and dy- rmproved design and appearance; namic street bfe, The reductton In Side and rear set- c b The reductton 10 front setback re- back does not prevent access to the sults 10 an Improved SIte plan or rear of any building by emergency Improved deSIgn and appearance, vehicles, c The reductton In side and rear set- d The reduction In Side and rear set- back does not prevent access to the back results In an improved Site plan, rear of any bwldmg by emergency more effiCient parkmg or Improved vehIcles; deSIgn and appearance; d The reductton m Side and rear set~ 5 The deSIgn of all butldtngs comphes With back results m an unproved Site plan, the Tounst Dlstnct deSign guldehnes In more effiCIent park::mg or Improved DIV1slon 5 of Arttcle 3. deSign and appearance Lot area and wldth The reductton 10 lot 6 6 The deSign of all butldmgs complies With area and/or lot WIdth WIll not result m a the Tounst Dlstnct deSIgn gutdehnes m btuldmg whIch IS out of scale With eXlst- D1V1s1on 5 of Arttcle 3 mg bwldmgs In the lmmed18te V1clmty of 7 Off-street parhng' Adequate parkmg IS the parcel proposed for development avatlable on a shared baSIS as determmed J Restaurants by all eXlstIng land uses Wlthm 1,000 feet Lot area and wldth The reductIOn m lot of the parcel proposed for development, or 1 park:mg IS avallable through any eXlstmg area will not result 10 a bUlldmg WhICh IS Supp No 6 C02 77 ~ g 2-803 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE out of scale WIth eXIstmg bmldmgs 10 the Immediate vIcmIty of the parcel proposed for development, Q 2 Locatwn The use of the parcel proposed for development WIll not mvolve direct access to a major arlenal street, 3 Helght The mcreased heIght results III an Improved SIW plan and/or Improved de~ Sign and appearance, 4 Signs No Sign of any kmd 15 deSIgned or located so that any portlOn of the Sign IS more than SIX feet above the fimshed grade of the front lot lme of the parcel proposed for development unless the sign IS a part of a comprehensive SIgn pro- gram; 5 Setbacks a. The reductlOn In front setback con- tnbutes to a more actlVe and dy- namIC street life, b. The reductIOn m front setback re- sults In an Improved Site plan or unproved deSIgn and appearance, c The reductiOn In SIde and rear set- back does not prevent access to the rear of any bUIldmg by emergency vehicles; d The reductIon m Side and rear set- back results 10 an unproved Site plan, more efficIent parkmg or unproved deSIgn and appearance, 6. Offstreet parkmg a The phYSIcal charactenstlcs of a pro- posed buildmg are such that the lIkely uses of the property WIll re- qUIre fewer parkmg spaces per floor area than otherwlse reqUired or that the use of sIgmficant portIOns of the bUIldmg for storage or other non- parkmg demand-generatIng purposes, b Fast food restaurants shall not be eligtble for a reductIon m the num- ber of off-street parkmg spaces, c Adequate parkmg IS avallable on a shared baSIS as determmed by all eXIstmg land llses WIthm 1,000 feet Supp No 6 CD2 78 of the parcel proposed for develop- ment, or parkmg IS available through any extstmg or planned and comnnt- ted parlung faCIlitIes or the shared parlong formulas In ArtIcle 3, DIVI- SIOn 14 7 The deslgn of all bUIldmgs comphes WIth the Tounst Thstnct deSIgn gUldehnes In DIV1slon 5 of ArtIcle 3 K Retml sales and servwes 1 Lot area and wldth The reduction ill lot area will not result m a bmldmg wh1ch IS out of scale with eXIstmg butldmgs In the rmmedtate VIClwty of tbe parcel proposed for development, Locatwn: The use of the parcel proposed for development WIll not mvolve dtrect access to a major artenal street; 2 3 Hetght The Increased helght results m an Improved SIte plan or rmproved design and appearance; Setbacks. a The reductIon In front setback con- tnbutes to a more actIve and dy- namlC street hie, b The reductIon In front setback re. suIts In an Improved SIte plan or unproved deSIgn and appearance, c The reduction m SIde and rear and setbacks does not prevent access to the rear of any bU1ldmg by emer- gency velucIes, d The reductIon In SIde and rear set- backs results m an Improved SIte plan, more effiCIent parking or 1m. proved deslgn and appearance, 4 5 Off-street parkmg a The physlcal charactensttcs of a pro- posed bUIldmg are such that the lIkely uses of the property WIll re- qUIre fewer parkmg spaces per floor area than otherwIse reqUIred or that the use of sIgmficant portIOns of the ZONING DIST-RICTS ~ 2-902 buildmg will be used for storage or other non-parlung demand-generat- mg purposes Adjacent land uses are of a nature that there is a lngh probabihty that patrons will use modes of transpor- tation other than the automobile to access the use; c Adequate parking is avatlable on a shared baslS as detennined by all eXlstmg land uses witlnn 1,000 feet of the parcel proposed for develop- ment, or parlong is available through any exIStIng or planned and COIDmlt- ted parking facwnes or the shared parkIng formula m Article 3, Divi- sion 14. b , , 6 The design of all bwldmgs complies With the Thunst Distnct des1gn gwdelines m DiVlsion 5 of Article 3 (Ord No 6526-00, ~ 1,6-15-00, Ord. No 6928-02, ~ 21, 5-2-02) DMSION 9 DOWNTOWN DISTRICT ("0") Section 2.901. Intent and purpose. The intent and purpose of the Downtown DiS- tnct is to estabhsh a nuxed use downtown where crtlzens can work, live, and shop m a place WhlCh is the econOJIllC, governmental, entertainment and cultural focal pomt of a liveable Clty Section 2-901.1. Maximum development po- tential. It 1S the mtent of the Downtown DlStnct ("0") that development be conslstent With the Countywide Future Land Use Plan as reqUlred by state law. The development potential of a parcel of land Wltlnn the D Distnct shall be detenmned by the standards found m th1s Development Code as well as the Countywide Future Land Use Deslg- natlOn of the property. For those parcels wlthm the 0 DIStnct that have a Future Land Use of Central Busmess Dlstnct ("CBD"), maXlmum de- velopment potential shall be as set forth for each claSSIficatiOn of use and location III the approved redevelopment plan Supp No 6 Section 2-902. Flexible standard develop- ment. The followmg uses are Level One permItted uses In the Downtown Distnct subject to the standards and cntena set out in tIns sectlOD and other apphcable proVlslOns of Artlcle 3 Table 2-902 "D" FleXible Standard Development Standards Max.. Herght Mm. Off-Street Use (ft ) Parkrng Accessory Dwellmgs nla nla Alcohohc Beverage 30-50 3---5 per 1,000 GFA Sales Attached Dwelhngs 30--50 1-15 per uwt ConventlOn Center 30-50 5 per 1,000 GFA Indoor RecreatJonJEn- 30--50 3---5 per 1,000 GFA terl;alnment FaCIlIty Nightclubs 30--50 3-10 per 1,000 GFA Offices 30-50 1-----3 per 1,000 GFA OvenugbtAceommoda- 30--50 75---1 per uwt bons Parkmg Garages and 50 nla Lots Parks and Recreatlon 50 1 per 20,000 SF or as Facl.l1tJes detenmned by the com~ mumty development coordmator based on ITE Manual standards Places of Worship 30--50 5---1 per 2 seats Public Transportation 10 nla FaCIlities Restaurants 30-50 5---15 per 1,000 GFA Reta11 Sales and Ser- 30-50 2-4 per 1,000 GFA Vlce Sldewalk Vendors nla nla SOCIal and Commumty 30-50 2-4 per 1,000 GFA Centers UtJlltylInfrastructure nla nla FaClhtles Flexibility standards: A Accessory dwellmgs One accessory dwell- mg, wluch is subordinate and accessory to a pnnclpal permitted use proVlded that 1 Title to the accessory dwelhng lS vested m the ownerslup of the pnncipal use; 2 The floor area of the accessory dwelhng does not exceed 25 percent of the floor area of the pnnclpal use CD2 79 - f"t./)~'I-O&o/1 fV1t{~ tt'~-Ll ~ CITY OF CLEARWATER 1""7 NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS The Community Development Board of the City of Clcarwaler, F]onda, wd] hold public heanngs on Tuesday, October 19, 2004, begmnmg at 2 00 pm, In the Clty Council Chdmber~ m CIty Hdll, 3rd floor, 1] 2 South Osceola A vGnue, Clearwater, F]onda, to consider the following requests: NOTE: All persons wlshml?: to address an ltem need to be ore..ent at the BEGINNING of the meetll11! Those ca..es that are not contested by the applicant. ..taff. nel1!hborml?: property owners, ete will be placed on a consent ae:enda and approved bv a sme:le vote at the bel?:mmne: of the meetm!:! ] K & P Clearwater Estdte. LLC the City IS requestmg for the only purpose of attachmg eondJtlOns of dpprova], of (]) f1ex]ble Development approval to Tenmnate the Status of a Noncooform]ty for denslty w]thm thc Tounst Dlstnct, under the prOV1SIOIlS of Section 6-109 C, (2) Flex]ble Development approval to pennlt 350 overnight accommodatIOn umts and 75 dttdched dwelhng<; as a nuxed use (wlth mcrease m denSity of 250 hotel rooms from the Beach by DeSign denSity pool), with a reductIOn to the front (east along Coronado Dnve) ~etbdck from] 5 feet to zero feet (to bulldmg), a reductIOn to the front (south along propo~cd Second Street) setback from IS feet to zero feet (to bUl]dmg), a reduction to the front (west and north d]ong South Gulfvlew Bou]evard) setback from] 5 feet to zero feet (to bUIlding), an Increase to the bUlldmg height from 35 feet to 150 feet (to roof deck) with an ddd]tlOna] five feet for penmeter parapets (from roof deck) and an add]tlOnal 33 feet for elevator, ~td]r, mechamcal rooms/arehltectura] embellishments (from roof deck), deViatIOn,; to dllow stacKed pdrklng, dllow access to a major artena] street and allow a bU1ldlllg wit!t1l1 the reqUIred sight ViSlblhty tnangle:;. at the mtersectlOn of Coronado Dnve dnd propo,>ed Second Street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment ProJect, under the prOV]~lOn,> of SectIOn 2-803 C, and to ehmmate the requtred foundatIOn landscapmg along Coronado Dnve and prop05ed Second Street, d;, a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the prOVISIOns of SectIOn 3-1202 G, and (3) the vacatIOn of a portIOn the nght-of-way for Gu]fv]ew Boulevdrd between Coronado Dnve and proposed Second Street, the vacatIOn of the Ftr,;t Street nght-of-way between Coronado Dnve and Gu]fvlew Boulevdrd, the ded]cdtJon of nght-of-way for proposed Second Street between Coronado A venue and Gu]fvlew Bou]evard and the dedicatIOn of nght-of-way for Coronado Dnve between proposed Second Street and Gulfv]ew Boulevard [Proposed Use' Hotel of350 rooms (127 78 room')/acre 011 total s]te) , 75 attached dwellmgs (2738 Ulllt~/acre on totd] ~Ite) dnd a maximum of 37,000 sq ft (031 FAR on total site) of amemhes accessory to the hotel, at a height of 150 ft (to roof deck) WIth an addltlona] 5 ft for penmeter parapet'; (frolO roof deck) and dn dddltlOnal 33 ft for elevator, stair, mechamca] rooms/archltectura] embellishments (from roof deck)] at 100 Coronado Dr & 201. 215 and 219 South Gullvlew Blvd, LJoyd-Whlte-SklOner Sub, Lots 44-55,90-100, 102, part of Lot 56 & 101, and Columbia Sub, Blk A, Lot] FLD2004-02013 (2) (cant from 9/2112004) Vlrl:!ml3 B Franks (Radcliffe Developmcnt Company, LLC) ]S rcquestlOg a F]ex]b]e 'l5eve]opment approval to develop 4 rc<;]dentldl attached dwelling umts on a 6,479 sq ft lot (10,000 sq ft IS reqUIred), With a m]mmum lot Width of 60 ft (lOa ft lS requued), a reductIOn m the front setback from IS ft to 569 ft to pavement, a reductlOD m the Side (,>outh) setback from 10 rt to 4 ft (to extenor slans) a reductIOn of the slde (north) setback from ] 0 ft to 672ft (to bUlldmg), a reductIOn of the rear setback from 20 ft to 10 ft to wooden dee.k, and a bUlldmg height Increase from 35 ft to 5 83 ft fr m F to roof m]dpomt under the provlSlons of SectIOn 2-803 B (Proposed U:;.e' Attached dwellmgs) t 69. iRa. iEs lanade, Manddlay Umt No 5 Rep]at, B]k 77, Lot 8 FLD2004-030IH 3 (cont from 9/2 ]/2004) Brll!htwater Pomt, LLC is requcstmg a Flex]ble Deve]opment to permIt a multi-use dock, under the prOVISIOns of SectIOn 3-601 (Proposed Use ConstruGt 2 mu]tl-use docks of 2,478 sq ft for 14 slips) at 205,209 and 214 Bnl!htwater Dr, Bays]de Sub No 2, Lots 27,28 & 29 FLD2004-06046 4 (cant from 9/21/2004) 1504 Garden Inc. IS reque<;tmg a Flex]ble Development approval to permit retall sak~ w]thm an eXlstll1g two-story commercial bUlldmg wlth a reduchon to lot area from ]0,000 sq ft to 7,720 ~q ft, a reductIOn to lot Width (west) from] 00 ft to 50 81 ft, reduction,; to the front (north) setback from 25 ft to ] 9 ft (to eXlstlllg and proposed bUlldlllg) and from 25 ft to ]4 ft (to proposed pavement), a reductIOn to the front (west) setback from 25 ft to i 5 ft (to proposed pavement), reductIOns to the Side (south) <;etback from ] 0 ft to ] ft (to eXlstmg and proposed bulldlllg) and from lOft to zero ft (to proposed pavement) dlld a reductIOn to reqUIred parklOg from 5 to 4 5 spaces per 1,000 <;q ft, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment ProJect, under the prov]SlOns of ScctlOn 2-704 C, and a reductIOn to the landscape bufTer along the "oulh property line from 5 ft to zero ft and a reductlOn 1tl the WIdth of the reqUIred foundatIOn landscapmg adjacent to the. bulldmg (wc~t ~lde) from 5 ft to 3 75 ft, as part of a ComprehensIve Landscape Program, under the proViSIOns of SectIOn 3- 1202 G (Pruposed Use Retal] sa]e" "nd services) dt 503 M drshdll Sf. E A M drshall 's Sub, Lot 10 & W Y2 of vac alley on E FLD2004-02010 - ,\ '. 5 (wnt from 9/2l!2004) Qualltv Boats Ioe & Clearwater Manne AQuarium. loe (Harbour Watch, LLC) are requestmg a Flexible Development approval to permIt 31 attached reSidential umts with .I front (north) ~etback of 66ft (to pavement) and 26 12 ft (to bUlldmg), a Side (ea~t) ~ctback of22 75 ft (to bUlldmg), a redr (~outh) ~etbdck of20 ft (to pool and cabana) and 53 56 It to bUlldmg, and a ~ld(:, (we~t) ~elbacK of zero ft (to pavement) and 22 74 ft (to bUlld1l1g), dnd a bmldmg helght of 85 ft from Base Flood ElevatiOn to mldpomt of the roof, as pdrt of .I Comprehensive 1nfill Redevelopment Project, under the provIsIOns of SectlOlls 2-704 C (Propo~ed Use Multl-famJiy reSidential) at 279 Wmdward Passaee, Island Estates of Clearwater Urnt 5, Blk C, W 50' of Lots 1 and 4 and all of Lots 5, 6, 7 and 8 FLD2004-06042 6 Windward Passaee CondomlOllIms. LLC I Hll!h and Dry Mdrma. Ine lS request1l1g a Flexlble Development to perm]t a multI-use dock Wlth a reductIOn to the ~Ide (cast) setback from 429ft to 187ft, under the prOVISIOns of SectIOn 3- 601 [Proposed Use ConstructIOn of a multi -use dock for 20 slips totaling 4720 ,>q ft, With each dock mCd~unng 50 ft In length from a lOft Wide boardwalk adjacent to the seawall (111 associatIOn With an approved 55 umt condommlum proJect)] at 202 Wmdward Passal!e, Island Estdtes of Clearwater Umt 5, Blk 0, part of Lot 9 and all of Lots 10-13 mel FLD2004- 05035 7 The MoorlOes Town Homes n. LLC lS requeshng a FleXible Development to penrut a multl-use dock, under the provlslOm of SectIOn 3-601 [Proposed Use. ConstructIOn of .I 740 sq ft multi-use dock for 6 shps, WIth each dock measunng 40 ft m length from the seawall (m association WIth an approved 6 urut townhome project)] at 674 Bavwav Boulevard, Moonngs Townhomes II, Lots 1-6 FLD2004-07049 8 Brw:htwater Cove LLC lS requesting a FleXible Development approval to penrut a mulu-use dock for 9 slips WIth a reductIOn to the Side (east) setback from 179ft to 7 ft, a reducl10n to the Side (west) setback from 179 fI: to 9 ft and an mcrease to the Width of the dock from 75 percent of/he lot Width (134 ft) to 90 5 percent of the lot wldth (162 ft), under the provI:>lOns of SectIOn 3-601 [Proposed Use Con~tructlOn of a 1700 sq ft multI-use dock for 9 "hp", WIth each dock measurmg a maximum of 589ft m length from the seawall (m aSSOCiatIOn Wlth an approved 9 umt townhome proJect)] at 130 Bnehtwater Dnve, Bnghtwater Cove, Lots 1-9 FLD2004-07051 9 DaVid A. & Sharon A Cote are reque:>l1ng a FleXible Development approVdI for (1) the TermmatlOn of Statu:> of Nonconfonmty for denSIty for the purpose of addmg a 3 car garage, under the proVISIOns of Section 6-109, and (2) the expansIOn of attached dwellmg::. With a reductIOn to the front (north) setback from 25 ft to 20 ft (to bUIlding) dnd a reductIOn to the SIde (south) setback from 10ft to 5 ft (to bUlldmg), as a ReSidential Infill Project, under the prOV1Slons of SectIOn 2- 203 C [Proposed Use' ConstructJOn of a 3 car attached garage m a~socIatlOn Wlth an eXlstlOg nonconfonmng attached dwelling (duplex)] at 115 North Keystone Drlye, Keystone Manor, Blk D, Lot 1 & 20 FLD2004-06044 10 John S. Tavlor. III/Interstate Hotels and Resorts (Continental DeSign & Supplies, LLC) are requestmg a FleXible Development approval to penrut a reductIOn to the number of parkmg space:> from 445 to 324 spaces at an eXlstmg overmght dcconunodal1on and retml sales use (Hilton Hotel), .IS a ComprehenSIve [nfill Redcvelopment Project, under the provI~lons of SectIOn 2-803 C [Proposed Use: EhmmatlOn of35 eXlstmg parkmg space~ m conJuncllon Wlth lmprovements to an eXIstmg hotel (Hilton)] at 400 Mandalay Avenue, Sec 08-29-15, M&B 2301 FLD2004-04027 1] Clly of Clearwater are requesting a Flexlblc Development appheatlOn to amend a preVIOusly approved FLD2002- 07021 A (COB approved on Apnl 15, 2003) to ehmlnate landscape Islands and <,cp,uators m the parkmg area south of the stadIUm and to add addltlonal land area wlthm the Progress Energy nght-of-way south of the ~tJ.dlUm for gras~ pdrklng, under the proVISIOns of SectIOns 2-704 Band 2-1404 A and to amend a preVIOusly approved Comprehenslve Slgn Program (SGN2003-0 I 002) for the stadIUm, under the proVISIOns of SectIOn 3-1807 (Proposed Use: AddItIOn of grass parkIng area wlthm Progress Energy flght-of-way adjacent to dnd :>outhwest of the Bnght Hou~c Networks stadIUm, ehmmatlOn of landscdpe I~lands and separator,> from paved parkmg .Ired <,outh of the stadlUm and amendment to the approved slgnage) at 601 Old Coachman Road, Sec 07-29-16, M&B 4101 & 4301 & Cledf\vater CollectIon 2nd Replat FLD2004- 07055/SGN2 004-0800 1 12 Clearwater Seashell Resort. L C. IS reque&tmg a FleXible Development apphcatJOn to amend a prevlOusly approved FL 01-01-0 I (CDS approved on February 20, 2001) to pem1lt an addll10nal 24 overnight accommodal1on umts from the den:>lty pool (m addll10n to the prcvlOusly approved 250 overnIght accommodatIOn umts) as a mixed use, With a maximum of70,000 sq ft of amcmtles accessory to the hotel and a mllllillum of 400 public parklllg space~, d~ d ComprehenSive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the proVISIOns of Sechon 2-803 C [Proposed Use Hotel of 250 rooms (153 37 room<;/acrc on total SIte), 18 altached dwelhngs (11 04 umts/acre on totdl &Ite) and a maximum of70,000 sq f't (098 FAR on tolal ::'lle) of amemlies dcccssory to the hotel, .It .I height of 150 ft (to roof dcck)] dt 229 and 301 &outh Gulhlew Boulevm d and . Ij 230.300 and 304 Coronado Dnve (Related to DVA2004-00002), lloyd-WhIte Skllmer Sub, Lots 57,58,59, 104, 105 & 106 and part of Lots 56, 103, & 107 FLD2004-07052 13 8a,'watch SUIte.. Inc 1 Valentmos Koumouhdls IS reque<;tmg a FlexIble Development apphcatiOn to pemllt attached dwelllDg~ wIth reduGhons to the front <;etback from 15 ft to zero ft: (to pavement and trash staging area), a reductiOn to the SIde (cast) setback from 10 ft to three ft: (to pavement), rcductiOns to the ,>]de (west) setback from 10 ft to 71ft (to pavement) and 73ft to bUilding, reductIOns of the rear <;etback from 20 ft to zero ft (to pool deck) and from 20 ft to 97ft (to bUIlding), as a ComprehensIve Infill Redevelopment Project, under the prov]Slons of SectiOn 2-803 C and the Transfer of Development R]ghts for 3 dwelling umts from 620 Bayway Boulevard (1 umt), 674 Bayway Boulevard (l umt), and 645 Bayway Boulevard (1 umt) [Proposed Use, Attached dwellmg umts (19 umt condommlUffi, 4 levels of hvmg area over ground-level parking)] at 600 Bayway Boulevard, Bayslde Sub No 5, Lots 6-8 & npanan nghts FLD2004- 07050/TOR2004-09012 14 Elhs & Co. Ltd, a Flonda Llffi]ted PatnershlP ]~ requestlllg a FleXible Development approval for the change of use of an eXlstmg automob]le <;ervlce statIOn to a 2,266 sq ft restaurant, wlth a reduction to the front (west) <;etback from 25 ft to 15 ft (to pavement), a reductiOn of the front (north) setback from 25 ft to 15 ft (to pavement), reductiOns of the slde (west) setback from lOft to 3 ft (to bUlldmg) and 10ft to zero ft (to extenor seatlllg wood deck), a reductiOn of the ~]de (south) setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to pavement), as a Comprehenslve Infill Redevelopment Project, under the proVISIOns of SectiOn 2-704 C, and as part of a Comprehewilve Landscape Program, under the proV1Slon:;, of SectIOn 3-1202 G (Proposed Use Restaurant) at 2201 Gulfto Bay Boulevard, Sec 18-29-16, M&B 32/04 and 32/05 FLD2004-08058 15 City of Clearwater IS rcquestmg a Flex]ble Development approval for mstallatiOn of a secunty fence at an eXlstmg potable watcr faCility The request mc1udes placement of an 8 ft fence cons]stlng of masonry columns wIth sub,>tdntldl ulummum grillwork Wlthm a front (north) setback and cxemptiOn from the landscapmg rcqUlrements along the proposed cham hnk fencmg proposed for the eastern and southern propcrty boundanes, as a ComprehensIve lnfill Redevelopment ProJect, per sectIOn 2-1204 A (Proposed Use: Secunty Fence) at 2775 State Road 580. Sec 29-28-16, M&B 31/01 FL 02004-09064 16 Ronald J. & MlreJlle Pollack are requestmg a FleXIble Development for an addltlOn to an ex]"tmg smgle-fam]ly resIdence The request lS for reduction to the Coastal Construction Control Lme (west) setback from 25 ft to 8 ft to the structure, a" part of a ResldentJal lnfill Project under the proVISIOns of SectlOn 2-203 C (Proposed Use" Detached Dwelhng) at 1000 Eldorado Avenue, Mandalay, Blk 69, Lot 6 & part ofLat 5 & npanan nghts FL02004-08056 1 7 Manal Od. Inc. lS requestmg an Appeal of an admllustratlve detenmnatlOn denymg the expanSiOn of the ret,1.I1 sales portIOn (convemcnce store) of a nonconformmg automobile serv]cc station, under the provlslons of SectlOns 4-501 A 2 and 4-503 (Proposed Use' ExpanSIOn of an automobilc servlce statIOn) at 1310 Cleveland Street, Brookwood Terrace Rev]sed, Blk 2, Lots 30-33 APP2004-00006 Interested partle<; may appear and be heard at the hearmgs or file written notice of approval or objection wIth the Planmng Director or CIty Clerk pnor to the heanngs Any person who deCides to appeal any declSlOn made by the Board, With re<;pect to any matter conSIdered at such heanng<;, Will need to request and obtam party status by the Board durmg the case d]~cusslOn, a record of the proceedmg<; and, for such purpose, may need to cnsure that a verbatIm record of the proceedmgs lS made, WhlCh record mcludes the testlmony and ev]dt.nce upon whIch the appeal ]~ to be based per Honda Statute 286 0105 Commumty Development Code SectIOn 4-206 <;tates that party statu:;, shall be granted by the Board lf person requestmg such demomtrates that Yhc ]s substantIally affected Party status entitles parties to personally testlfy, present l-v]dence, argument and wItnesses, cros:;,-exanune Wltne~<;es, appeal the declSlon and speak on reconsideratIOn requests An oath W]1l be adm]ll1stered sweanng all partiCIpants III pubhc heanng casc~ If you WIsh to "peak please walt to be recogmzed, then state and spell your name and proVide your address Persons speakmg before the CDB shall be !tmlted to three mmutes unle:;,:;, an mdlvldua] ]s representIng a group III which case the Ch3lrperson may authonze a rea~ondble amount oft]me up to 10 mlllute<; F]ve days pnor to the meetmg, staff reports and recommendations on the abovc rcque<;ts wlll be available for reVlew by mtcre<;ted part]e<; between the hours of 830 a ill and 4 30 pm, weckdays, at the CIty of Clearwater, Plalllung Department, 100 S Myrtle Ave, Clearwater, FL 33756 Please contact Frank Gerlock, Development Rev]ew Manager, at 562-4557 to dlscu~<; any que::,t]ons or concerns about the proJcct and/or to better understand the proposal and revIew the <;lte plan I hIS notIce was sent by the OffiGla] Rccords and LegIslatIve Services Depdrtment, Cynthld E Goudeau, CMC, CIty Clcl k - Cyndl T "rapam IJlanlllng Department Cynthia E GOUdCdU, CMC CIty Clerk CIty of Clearwater POBox 4748, Cleanvater, FL 33758-4748 NOTE Apphcant or reprc~cntatJYe must be pre<;cnt at the heanng YOU ARE BEING SENT [HIS NOTICE IF YOU ARE THE APPLICANT OR OWN PROPERTY WITHIN 200 FT OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN THE OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES DEPT. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL THE OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLA TIVE SERVICES DEPT WITH THEIR REQUEST AT (727) 562-4090. Ad 10/03/04 ~~ ""1 !':tI1 ~ /'')> mtl'1 m[/l _[/l ~...., i>...., B m _tl'1 C> ". -r' ",r' B em m < < '" )> )> ...., ...., 0 ...... ~ Z I ~ ~ ~i~~~ ~ ~~ [!! '" ~i~5~ ~~ ~ ". 2 ~ ~ lil ~Gl~ ~ ::l: ~ "'Sl~::l: ~~ ~ ~ f;, ~ l!! ~ &'" 10 I ~ ~ r m =1 )lJ -" ~, \ '" I D rn ~ ----f-J lllZ 1'0 mi"i L...3 ~::r: etl'1 r' ~ ~ 5 z 1;[/l 1'0 me ~...., ::r: "m r tI1 < ')> :j o z 1 t '''i _{~I " b . '" . "'''' ... . '" . ~~ I f'o; - l ~ ~. ~ ~ m '" 2 ~ ~! p ~ ~ '" ~ !!:~! " '" =< ". ". l! i! ~ 20 /,<;;; -< ,., " ;n 0 i '" ~~~ ....m ~ ih ;n 8 ;n ~ l> ~~ 8 '" 8 ;{i ()~ ~ '" '" m ~ i:: > I N " ~ ~ g g ~:j~..~ II (, z 3 1Ii 0 ~ ~~~ ~~ r ~!ill<: Cl~F ~~~ i51'l> '" fi;'~ ~.-;:: ~ ""<)0 "'", ,,'n'n La RIsa II Condoffilmums ~~ ~~ Qi[KG9CBIlG9 ~mr:UDQfrG9a;&~ unoa.:o 2424 CURLE:W RO Fl UC AIL t-oOO.=l.40 PAUoi I'I.tRijOR f'tOAIOA J ,,-s.s:s 12'-1l!;1 -581!l! [.10.:( 761-02=:i~ www ~k..rllllorL:"1'I cClm tl1 ...... CD <: ~ o :::l en Clearwater, Florida @~ :!: ('; Cl :;.,~ ~ ""'0 ::;~C _Z ~O' 'Tl r' o o ~ ." r' >- Z @~ 1'\;:0 1'0 :0 iil'Tl _-l ern ~ >- n "Tj ." r' >- Z J __1__- il-l -------- --r 0 -t- . _---- I ,_'! " " I I 'I 'P---q ^ - ~~) , I I I --1 I I . , r~- I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I l, 12 n -" ". ~ ~ '" ~ -- --1-- __uu -- ~ m ~~ ,..- r-DI~ o;n ~~ - "... ~. r:;::::;::--_-_-_-.:~-~-~.:;:;'i - - --~ ~: ~:! ! ~ I: I ~.::::::-_-__:..-_-_-_~~~ >~.l. ~ _ __J @~ '-1';- ~ ~ ~ " ejijN ;: _ Z g" 0' ~ 'w ? z:; " 0' ~ ~ -l ::r: -rj ~ r' 0 0 i\!~ ;;0 ~i ,.~ ." r' >- ~ Z ~ I ~ ~ L__I t-~-1 1==-::1 r~- I I I I I I I I L_--, ---t . I . . I , , I , i , ~ ~ z , \ ~~ l-Q"Tj ~g tIl ""1 \ I ,--------~------/ _} , it In I I I ~ __..~...-.....-.-... L l'l ------ 7'\. ....,-..... ....--... ,.-...............--- ~ > I ...... ~ '!l g 0 g II .. iiI B ~ IS ':' l:: 3 g ~ La Rlsa II COndOmIniUmS I Clcarwatc r, n 1 Flomld ...... ..,.................,. ,...,..,...>-..<~~ ~ - ~. ~~I~~ ;.~? {'<<~J/jl; J) I 'p~ 'H . i 1 l{jljl ~~1 .~i~ ,l: 413:1:j )~ i' ~l~'t~t H;~- .tR , f--' - ~5 ~ : ~ jf!~ ~ ,I' "m f ' ",....7- , I (~:S' , ~, l( : j.n.13Jt1 ~ : j l I l: '~ p, , ,< 1 :,~ctt -7J 4 I }:-H-tJ 1-t -.i i ~.c04 i: ~, :: U i'lnI ~~ .., I ft' :tt~r-[~ ~ "ji:ti>l~\' '1 (t ~ ';. l I l ~t_')I(I!~ ~ 1 ~ f ~ ~: c I~ht\!> I: d l "".0:: t t ~\~~,,:q i ) - i' ~~ --- P-~'" ~ ;JI ~ '" ~ 'ii "". i:1~ "l '"I/: ~~ ~~ ~~ .'I~ccfe .L'h'cllitct:ts iut:o :2424 CURLEW RD FII. L,I'C AA COOD~,U] p......... HARe:OR' Fl.ORIIJ'.i\ ':;46B3 721-7B.1-~!l.Ei:i r",x "f.B1-1)2.55 ......... -o~..f;!l-l;lr~I1I;.Qm -- '<c . ~ OR ~ , _-IIIr","- ~l ~ ~_(III~:,'li, I I I III I'll l1'm)_ I I, II h.. ROa= TEflRACE - ,........" .- ..... ~ .I i'oo,. ~- ~- ~ I-- ++ I- , + Il - - I- T H ....- - '-- FaRrW FlOOR ,........" ~ .- ..... i'oo,. - ~- ~ - ACcENT AFOl .~ I-- I-- H , iii .t r r-- .. 1- .,- ~ - ~ + - - - Tl-IIFlP flOOR Il ,........" ,--... /' &tuXO RNleH. PANTED ~ ~ ~ "- ~ ANODIZE COl..OR ... ...- / ~ 68tD1-1 (F'ORTER PAW) - .~ I-- I-- , Il h 1-- . I .-. - ~ ~ flOOR - ~ ~- .....i'oo,. ".-..., -- -- ~ + il .t - ~ I I -- ~T FlOOR ,----., ~ / ""\ , "'\ . ~~ FB1A ---- ----- ~-- ------ --- -- ___ ....3 ~ in GRaH> FLOOR I;> in SEA LS\IEl. :AT 0'v9iRIf ,.... EAST ELEVATION I ~! f 1 I~~I", 8' 204' ~' ",.,OJ , --I Ie: -. L--i t-_. . .- . I l _), .:r ~ - ~ z :::) """"'l COl..OR SCl-ECIJ.E, lUall: Port<< Paint, AkIond BbMoII. 681)1-1 Tra Port<< Paint, lIMe Ap1cDt. 6~1 FIL~ 80PY __J . El..EVATOR ~ ~..~ ;c:~ '" "A' ..... '" .... JIll '.. ~ ...... ~ ~~: '" '1if;T"'~"'..~~ EXPOSED DECORATIvE R.6FTER EDGES r-- J- 'M' ,:~ ;.; f :,I'~:i.~;'r:;.. '-oi:. ' RI?G'f TERRACE .;. - ~~-.. ;;:,. - . == == ~ == t- t- ~ f= r FC\RfI.l FlOOR I- I === II II II II ~ II tl II II C C II - == . === ; 3 - - t- - ~ ~ ~ ~ r -- .....- L....J 1 n.l1RD Fl.OOR 1t ~ . I .~ C lJ tl lJ II lJ lJ II - ~ ~ I ~ r llRX.GlT JRQ.l I ; TYFE RAlLNS, - l- t- - ~ TYP. I I .,. bI -..... eeccw R..OOR ~ Il II lJ 1:1 lJ c II II '---- :=:::: ~ ; ~ I-- - - t- - 1 ~ I ~ r -..... F~T FLOOR ~ == C II lJ 1:1 tl II II C '---- ~ == -0- == ;0 ~~ = ___ .....l FEHA ~ --- ~--------------- -- \ OFEN TO CiARA6E ~ ~ -' an I GRC4.tID FlOOR I' l- . in eEA LEvEL WEST ELEVATION I I I I tJ' &' 24' 40' ~ 6OEDlLf: 1lI/I1~ Porter Pa~ AIIlonc:l 61oeeo11,68rtlI-1 Trill: Porter Paint. UhIta Apricot. 6199-1 . _ ..F _ ~ ...- .--. _~. ~_ ."... .... I"" " .,.. .....__ ...... __ ....... ... _'"' .... .............. _"'" It . ....... .,- - . -- ..,. .' ,,- ... ."'. - .... ... .. - . . - .....:... "':':":'::-'"... .~.,.. TL~.." ~.:V .-::~ .r~.;:~.r:. . ..... --. .... .~ .. _. .... ........ -........ ,....,..... -.. Nlal It ~ I'\.OCllt it . TIlR) Fl.OOR :It it . 6ECCN) Fl.OOR ~ I'NTP\..OCIIt \ ~ -- ---- ~ ~ R..OOR . 'r eeA LE'.'El. ill \ OPEN TO cww.E NORTH ELEVATION r'~4 F"'~~'-~~'1 " 24' 4If ~ CGlllR eoe:w:. 11II11. PorW....N, AIDId ~ H!II-I ,.,... PorW PIN, .... ,lp1cc>l, 6?lS-1 f.,.~r' I'~ 4' - r1 "n, -I r- ~l :.,'_ - :s -.... " " 1\ ':-',c... oW i~.;. -~ _.._.:, 1 ..-~ '":J i -::J C---J J::. \ -- .----' . - ~ .,. ClAY ~ Tl.E ELEVATOR~ ~ I"EPAL.I..Dl R:la' 'I!RUa! 1IlEW5. DAl'IC: ILI:lOD LOCK II , ~ AIIDllTEC1\IIfA e.AN:l, ~T eTae LOCK OPEN STAIR B.EVATOR CMRUl ~ I"CIR:Il. o.w: uoc::o l.O(X eu:co ...... PAInED ~ A4lXllZE CXIU:lR "'I~ PANr8 . . " :. SOUTH ELEVATION I I I I ~ w 24' IrIf CXIU:lR llOEIltLEs 11IIIo I"c:Nr PI" AIIad ~...I ,.,. 1"'c:rW..... Ufte .f4:IrlOOI,'~ I :r IIUl TTfE IlOCI' ~ " Jl I'QImII'l.Oat ~ TIlIJiI[) fUXIlt ~ ~ fUXIlt " II FRlT R.OOR ~ ~ FB1A ~ GRUCI'\..OOIIt ~ eEA UML -f ~iJ:g Yo , , -\\~:~" ,b! II "lil~ III \ " \ ------- ~ ~?>n~ ' -, \ " \~ , " \ \ "--- , - -, " ~ ' ~ l~~\ \ -,- :' I ~ ~ .~! I ~ ~.' I ~,li' l~ - - -I' : ,.\ ! .,.. :..' ,/ / , . -. - '" II!II~ iiliiiibiiiiii l; In~ I dlll!t ~ ~. 'I.,.~r ~ .0 :uu r ~! '" ,~:~ gi ~ ~8~~ ~: ~ ~ . ~ . --,.:::: -=-=--"'" -_ iJ I \~ "~ ~ tf:~ . '-:1 I' -~ ~ ' l~t .- r t l . - I I ., _ \. l l S~~ :5 ~')' ~jl-l;f -, IL :: l I 1.r' VC- :?=5 ~ J &;.- .::_=.1 w. I ~~_ _-r..----"...:. - :j ~ t;': _ fO ::. t: 't'" '" ;>. r ......... ~ :;:.J :'" 'It f ~ il ~ t j;: :lit f~ ~ ~ , ! d !' J ; } 'J. Ill' ! .:' .~ Ii I"', ~ ! Ii! ( . h, J~ i .'J! 'Il! :: j'l t _ K I I ~ I ~I T, .1 , ~i t~ Ii f'll ~ " ~ !' i ! ~; l. ,~ : ill .1 '( .-. ~ . 1 If' "'i' Ii · '" fl.. fl. ~ . . . ,. " I 1 "I 1 ,,~! . , . . . , !~ if !; I 1"1 'u . : I ! II.' Ii'" ~ 1 'I' ;21.1 I" ., '. j I I I' - " i j < 'f f " 1 (' It ii'j iii' I" P if i :! qJ;t <J h I ,j I 11 ~ I' f I tl.( ~ Iii I f: ! !! i ,t! hi) 1 f I J , l~ 1 l' , ii ' ~h$ ill lb' 1 . j i., 1 . l" ~, i F 'j'~ I; :' t'! f i1 i ~ i !~I~ ; f 1 f . i " , i · I II i l ] t" i' i 1 ,il. l; i n' I ~ l P i jiii . 1 ; :( i . i ,I ! it; i i Ii! ~ Jl l t t ~ ~ jiI ~ ~ <"> ::;j ,. ..... nil go.' , ~ ~ . ~o ~~~ ~~~It@".-.. .: 1"'IIIlUC1_ ~' o ' ,1i.. ." \ ' -....-""' ... --- .-;;. -~ ~ ": r . rr...T\ft-;}.j ill II! l;' O! II '<l ~ hl!i n :Ii~ I!ll! hi, If ;2 · ill' " · -; , j: i~ :! ! It,l :1 } dill ;1 'i j 'l" ~ I: j" 'I ,I n i !hl ,'- I' \' .- o! '1 i! · ~i i; i Ii!; :. III I :1 Ii : ~~, I . I ifi I " 11 ,'f P _ t ul 1 }" 1" ". 'fi I I III i ! Ii '" 1;" I I !f. r · ! I !j I If'. ! f Ji : .f ~, iil 'J .. t I I J". 1 I I! ~ I !: i" '. 1 . I I' i~1 J! h ~ Ii'! U'~"'l 1 [t f' ~ j! I. f 1 '~ :ll H ~i } i i :l! t I I' I ! P III ;! ~! I I. ., I. I, i I Ii' ~ ~ ~t I >- C- C) <<:.:) ..... ..J - ...... ,. g ~ - <> l. ~ '" .1 .n .:;; k 1=,' .i Ki I 1.A R&A U ""'V-I...-r.;:o;.o._ ..." _ CLEARWATER FLORJl)A LAND ~CAPE PLAN Kl'nll 1lA0000F"l'E DE\'ELOPMEIl'T LL.C CM~~~f\C"'\5:;(l(~\TLS.INC 242.. CURLEW ROAD ~"'Rb'''~I!lIf1i'''' ~11'ILO....-:r.. I\Al'N'IG PAU. jf~BOR .f'L ~68J """'IHI; -':::""1IRDlo_ ~ ""!I':I->n"l ~~(~ ~ ~ 8 ~ ;;S ~ I., ......L " TABLE,60G '( ~~ .. TABLE 600 FIRE RESISTANCE RATINGS REQUIRED FIRE RESISTANCE IN HOURS 'j I" i I TYPE IV TYPE V TYPE VI STRUCTURAL TYPE I TYPE II TYPE lU 1.Hour , 1-Hour 1-Hour ELEMENT Protected Unproteeted Protecled Unprotected Protected Unprotected "J>AIUY.AND ARe WALLS (a) 4 4 4 4 \ 4 4 4 4 4 Ir-.'TERIOR BEARING WAUS (I) , Supponmg columns, olller beanng walls or more lhan one floor 4 3 2 1 NC 1 (h) o (h) 1 0 Suppllftmg one floor only 3 2 I 1 NC I 0 1 0 ~Uppnnlng roofs only 3 2 I I NC I 0 I 0 INTERIOR NONBEARING PARHflONS &e 609 2, 704 I, 704 2 and 705 2 COLUMNS (q) (I) See 605 Supponmg olller columns or more lhan one floor 4 3 H(d) I NC I 0 I 0 ~upportmg one floor only 3 2 H(d) I NC I 0 I 0 Supportmg roofs only 3 2 H(d) 1 NC I 0 1 0 BEAMS GIRDERS, TRUS~ES & ARCHES (I) See 6Q5 Suppornog columns or more I han on~ floor 4 3 H(d) I NC I 0 I 0 \uppomng one floor only 3 2 H(d) I NC 1 0 I 0 \uppoTllng roofs ooly II/l{e p) I(e f p) H(d) 1(e p) NC(e) I 0 I 0 ~ FLOORS & FLOOR/CEILING (1) See 60S In) (n,o) (n) (m,n 0) (0) A5SE~~L1ES 3 2 H (0) I NC I 0 1 0 . ROO,? ,& ROOF/CEILING See 605 ....~SEMqLlES (g) 11/2(e p) 1 (efp) H(d) I(e,p) NC(e) I 0 I 0 EXTERIOR BEARING WALLS and gable ~nds of roof (g I J) (% mdlcales percent of prOlecled and unprotecled ~ all openmgs penruttcd See 705 I I for protecuon requirements ) , H nn zOnla I separation (dl.I..m~e from common propeny hne or assumed prop.:n y hne) o fl to 3 fl (c) 4(0%) 3(0%) 3(0%){b) 2(0%) . 1(0%) 3(0%)(b) 3(0%)(b) 1(0%) 1(0%) ow~3 fllo 10 ft (c) 4(10%) 3(10%) 2(10%)(b) 1(10%) 1(10%) 2{IO%)(b) 2(1O%)(b) 1(20%) 0(20%) o\er lOft CO 20 fI (c) 4(20%) 3(20%) 2(20%)(b) 1(20%) NC(20'll) 2(20%)(b) 2(20%)(b) 1(40%) 0(40%) ol'Cr 20 fI (0 30 fl 4(40%) 3(40%) 1(40%) 1(40%) NC(40%) 1(40%) 1(40%) 1(60%) 0(60%) ,over 30 fI 4(NL) 3(NL) I(NL) I(NL) NC(NL) l(NL) I(NL) '<NL) O(NL) , EXTERIOR NONBEARING WALLS and gable ends 9( roof (g, l.j) (% IDdJ.cales pereep( of protected and unprotecled wall opemngs penrulted See 705 I I for protectIon requuements ) , , " Honzonul scparauon ldlslance from common propen)' hoe or assumed propcny hne) o fllo 3 fI (c) 3(0%) 3(0%) 3(0%)(b) 2(0%) 1(0%) 3(0%)(b) 3(0%)(b) 1(0%) 1(0%) over 3 fllD 10 fI (c) 2(10%) 2{10%) 2(10%)(b) 1(10%) 1(10%) 2(lO%)(b) 2(tO%)(b) 1(20%) 0(20%) 0\ er 10 !Ita 20 fI (c) 2(20%) 2(20%) 2(20%)(b) 1(20%) NC(20%) 2(20%)(b) 2(20%)(b) 1(40%) 0(40%) Oler 20 fl (0 30 fl 1(40%) 1(40'*) 1(40%) NC(40%) NC(40%) 1(40%) 1(40%) 0(60%) 0(60%) o\er 30 fl (L) NC (NL) NC(NL) NC(NL) NC(NL) NC(NL) NC(NL) NC(NL) O(NL) O(NL) ~ f ( J , l' , \ ~ w1. :, , For 51 I fl '" 0 305 m NC '" Noncombusl.lble Nt", No Lllruts H '" Heavy Timber Sizes '; 64 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE - BUILDING J' I IC t ~ , l TABLE 600 NOTES '" l'\Oles: a See 704 5 for extensll,m of pany walls and flfC walls b See 104 5 for parapets c See 105 for protection of wall opewngs d > Where honzontal separatIOn of 20 fI or more IS provIded wood columns, arches, beams, and roof deck coofomung to heavy tlmber SlZes may be used ~ externally -' e In bUlldmgs nOI over !Wo stones approved fire retardant ueated ....nod may be used f In one-story bUlldlDgs, structural members of heavy timber SIZes may be used as an alternate to unprotected structuml roof members StadiUms, field houses and arellll$ WIth heavy umber wood dome roofs are pemuned An appro~ed automatic spnnkler syslCm shall be IDstalled In Ihose areas where -20 ft c1carance 10 the floor or balcony below IS nOI provided g See IS II for penlhouses and roof struClures h The use of combushble consttuctlon for Intener bearing partlUons shall be Imuted 10 the support of not rnoA: than two floors and a roof Ex tenor wa lis shall be fire tested ID accordance WIth 60 I 3 The fire resistance reqUIrements for eltenor walls with 5 ft or less honlOnta I scparalton shall be based upon both lntenor and e:uenor fire exposure The fire reSlSl:lnce requirements for C:l>tenor walls With rnoA: than 5 fI bortzootal scparalton shall be based upon mtenor fire exposure only Where Appendix F IS specifically Included III the adopl1ng ordinance, see FI02 26 for fire resistance requirements for extenor walls of Type IV bUlld- mgs III Fire DlStnct k Walls or panels shall be of noncombusuble matenal or fire retardant treated wood, e:l>cept for Type VI conStJlICtlon For Group A - Large Assembly, Group A - Small Assembly, Group B. Group E, Group F, Group R occ:upanclCS and Automobtle Parkmg Structures , occupancies of 'tYpe I construClLon. panltlons. columns, U'IIsses, gmlers, beams. and floors may be reduced by I hour If !he bullWng IS eqUipped With an aUlomatJc spnnkler sysu:m throughoul, but no oomponent or assembly may be less than I hour m Group A - Large Assembly (no slage requmng proscemum OpeDlng protection) and Group A - Small Assembly OC1:upancles of Type V Unprotected con- SlruCtlOll shall have I-hour fire reSISlan1 floors ovcr any craw I space or base mCDt n For Group B and Group M occupancIes of Type IV or Type V constructJon "hen five or more stones m height a 2.hour lire reSISlan1 floor shall be requIred over the bascment o For unspnnldered Group E OC1:upancles of Type III, 'I)tpe IV Unprotected, 'tYpe V UnproteclCd or 'tYpe VI UnprotCCled, floors located IInmedL:ltely above useable space m bascments shall have a fire resistant ratmg of not Icss than I hour ,p In bUildings of Group A, B, E and R occupancies. the reqUired lire reS1Sl:lnce of the roof or roof/cclllng assembly IOcIudlOg the beams, girders. tJ'IISS. es or archcs that support the roof only may be ormtted ....here every part of the roof structural members have a clear height of 20 ft (6096 mm) or more above any floor, mezzamne or balcony q See 7014 ;. \ ( t ( I ~ ~~ ~ ( ~ t l ,. " -'. l' ~ " \ -~ v ~ 6.5 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE - BUILDING , - , c ____ ~....J..-...- I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ J tt.h ~ ~I , ,\! separate exterior walls meeting the requirements of Table 600 for zero clearance from propeny hnes as required for the type of construction Separate extenor walls shall mclude one of the followmg I A parapet not less than 18 Inches (457 mm) abO\e the roof line 2 Roof sheathmg of noncombustible matenal or fire retar. dant treated wood. for not less than a 4 ft (1219 mm) wIdth on each side of the extenor dlvldmg wall ~ 3 One layer of 5/8 mch (15 9 mm) Type X gypsum board attached to the underslde of roof deckmg, for nOlless than a 4 ft (1219 mm) Width on each Side of the extenor diVIding wall 704.4.2 When not more than 3 stones In height. town- houses may be separated by a Single wall meetmg the fol- lowmg requlfements I Such wall shall proVide not less than a 2.-hour fire resistance ratlOg Plumbing. plpmg, ducts. e1ectncal or other bUlldmg services shall not be mstalted wlth- m or through the 2. hour wall. unless such matenals and methods of penetratIOn have been tested In accordance With 70 I 2 ,c 2 Such wall shall be contmuous from the foundallon to the underside of the roof sheathmg Q.r shall have ;, a parapet eXlendmg nOI less than 18 Inches (457 mm) above the rooflme When such wall tenmnates " ";, .' at the underside of the roof she~thmg. Ihe roof sheathmg for not less than a 4 fl (1219 mm) Width r on each Side of the wall shall be of noncombuslLble matenal. or fire retardant treated wood, or one layer of 5/8 mch (15 9 mm) Type X gypsum wallboard attached to the underside of the roof deckmg "" - 3 Each dwelhng Unit sharmg such wall shall be , deslgned and constructed to mamtam lts structural Integnty mdependent of the Unit on the opposite Side of the wall ~ 'l ~, ~ , -, , " Exception: Satd wall may be penetrated by roof and floor struClural members prOVided that the fire reSistance rating and the structural mtegf1ty of the wall IS mamtamed , -. ) f I , ' , , i' " " 704.S:Fire wall el.tensions and parapets ", 704,5.1 Fire "all extensions '~704.5_1.1 Party walls and fire walls shall extend not ~ ,~'Iess than 3 ft (914 mm) above the roof " <0" ') I~ , , I- " ~ 'ii ~ " " Exception: Fife walls shall not be required to f '. extend above the roof where the roof IS .. ~? , I Noncombustible m Types I. II and IV con- > ~ structlOn, or _ .:: " 2 Noncombusllble or fire retardant treated wood ,':'. ' for an area wlthm 40 ft (122m) of each slde ~ ~ 'r: of the wall m Types III. V and VI construction '" ~704.S.1.2 Party walls and fire walls shall extend not - "'Iess than 18 IOches (457 mm) past ex tenor IOtersechng ',: walls of combustible construCllon or extenor noncom- I' ';" bustlbJe walls With combustible proJecllons or veneers The party or fire wall shall extend not less Ihan 18 lOch- I \ ..... l , , , ~ ~ . FLORIDA BUILDING CODE - BUILDING , ,~ ~ -~- 704 4 2.705.1 21 es (457 mm) past any combustible proJecllOn or veneer Party walls or fire walls shall extend to the mSlde fac- mg of the extenor surface of noncombustible construc- tIOn 70.t5.1.3 Flre \\alls shall be In accordance With the reqUirements of NCMA- TEK 5-8 or eqUivalence In bnck or poured concrete or other nallonally recognized tested systems I 70-4.5.2 Parapet Walls In Type III and Type V ConstructiOn. eXlenor walls shall extend not less than 18 mches (457 mm) above the roof El.t:eptions: 1 Walls located more than 15 fl (457 m) from a common property Ime or centerhne of a public way 2 Where the roof slopes more than 4 12 from the back of the extenor wall SECTION 705 PROTECTION OF OPENINGS 705.1 Protection of wall openings 705.1.1 Protection of openings in exterior "ails 705.1.1.1 The proVISions of 705 1 I do not apply to Group R3 occupancies 70S 1.1.2 Every extenor wall Within 15 ft (4572 mm) of a property hne shall be eqUipped With approved opemng protectlves Exceptions: I Extenor walls not reqUired by Table 600 to have a fire resistance ralmg 2 Show Windows fronting on a street or public space 3 Open parkmg structures meet 109 the reqUire- ments of 411 3 705.1.1.3 Where openmgs m an exlenor wall are above and wlthm 5 ft ( 1524 mm) laterally of an openmg of the story below, such opemngs shall be separated by an approved noncombusuble flame barrier extendmg 30 Inches (762 mm) beyond the exlenor wall 10 the plane of the floor or by approved vertlcal flame barners not less than 3 ft (914 mm) high measured vertically above the top of the lower openmg Such flame barners are not reqUired when a complete approved automatlc spnnkler syslem lS Installed 705.1.1.4 Fresh alr Intakes shall be protected agamst extenor fire exposure by means of approved fire doors, dampers or other SUitable protection 10 accordance With the degree of exposure hazard 705.1.2 Protection of openings in interior walls 705.1.2.1 General. Opemngs m mteflor walls and par- titiOns shall be protected m accordance With 705 1 2 and Table 705 I 2 7.7 ~ ~ ~ b ~ ~ }. .......... ~ -.. .' '1 ' .... -~ I r J ~.- -l - - - -1~ l J, "", ~ ,. II lr-- - -.... <-;; 1i . J: ~ .- II :; - - .... - -," ,~?::--:;~~----~.!~-~~:~ I:: J _ ~" " i', i-;:-::-._,..!.~" 1 '-I,=",,,,,,,~..,,.,,,,,,,J ~~, ,I I {,..j';. '~f J [.::' 11 J--=-- I("'-.:~ I '/';' lJ ~ j , -' I J '/_:.:::-----..",....J \ -~t ..,....,., I'..... ~~ "'+P;:~I ">..............-b Ii:: .-... " ' . {'t. J 't' I t, " \f'}- - - -' , ~, " , 1%1 \ 1 " f I I", J:,.,;-h 1 / l ,I;:::.: ~-,\.'I": I ~) - -:.-r~-~;::, ~ %} w-:r: ~ t '....-t 1';" _ i(. },-::,,~...'" .fr~ I.... 'i" ~~--.lj~...t'"1..... Jv'" L" ....... ;' I!"" ..", I})" - "fi" -I '" ~~, .".""', , 'I;, - ... ~ ) -<";; '1-1:.':"'..t 1 < ~'i" ~ ,,'\ /..,.. ~, 1:- -11.0 -r,"",~,",,,,{ :~...r: ~r! :"J j :10 ,,'" ;.rq~..jl~-i~ :.l '*-'-.,........ 1'1.~'i:... _~/ ...~ I 1\1 ;. v... )1.41J"....t....{;..~'\.,,~....i~J* ..~1. ~... ~ fl \ I ~ ~ '<.-~)!'} I ,l~"-"f~~'<'"" .."'>\""1'-"~.-:-~I" 'f ~f""-t' (...~! '- l , I "} j 'Ij.... ~r'j ~ j( ! J.... f'! '" ... j.. t :,'" ru , ..J _.." "1.,.<~",,,;- '1", : /~ " ~ , - \ i i ~ ~""L 1 ....,. 'l. ,>i':.---~ J "-<. ~ "" -. --- it ...t -">' ":r~::1 ___ \ ~ J t' .. ~ t fl..." .,.1-+~...---l;:,;ir.J\.r-.}~'l t"'......~ ~.i\ t~t'11 I ~""'r J~ .... ~........ ~>.::- A: ~ \: j ~ : _ ~ (1'"... -( "......e;, to .... S \ -'l J fJ ..... , J'" ""<j!:..{<Tc"~~\~>.i,,,.wr';~.......,"'V,..'W~ '4 i ~ ;..._-....t.; ..~.: -4"1' ~..... ~Irj ,"11.., ,",~1-4 f~l h"1\~J'f' i^~'1' r~ ~~~f'j'l'< ..... ~ '- , ~ ~ "tl ~ - ~ S ~ b ~ ~ 'Ci' .... Q (ll ~ E? :!l ~ i:l () ~ a (~~ g' d S -3' ~ ~ [{: 8 0 d ~ e; s:-...., < '""I ;:t. ::l l1l..... 0 l1l ::l ::I ....., l1l l1l (1) p.:l ::r ::;. @- - 0.. cs ?-"g c (ti1~ VI l1l [{:. Il)""d ::s (1) ~~~~-~0~~o2-x~VI~os ....~~ 0(1:>< (1) _::I 3-.... ~ ~~"d3l1l(1)3~0"~~~(')o ~x - ~ (1) l1l:3 - - 0 (') e; ~ 0 15 [:g.-.< < 0 .... l1l (JQ:Y g I:j a Pl - "d ....., ::Igo~g::s~g3~~~3g-.<~ffi ~_::s~nQ) ~ ::r-"d::so(l:>D.: ~O"~No(')g;Q)~0"l1l3-p.:l2 .... :4 ~~ ~ ~ g o..~ 0. ~ a ~ @- &. ~ ~ ~ (l:>l1l g a~-~~aoVl ~n~ tTl t""" ~ S. 3- l1l S ::I < ~ 0 gO',......., ~ ..gj 0 ~ ::s ~ - o~ 0 l1ls l1l ~.::r ~ ~ l::j_.....,~o-(t"d(l:><: '""IlI>O lI> (l:>Q) l1l1:j0..3 tlll1lo::t.o ::t =::l 0 (JQ Pl cr ::l ::l ::l 0.. Q) _. 8..~~~~:;rS g &.g (Ii ~(JQ ~ & ~ I 0 - Pl .... ,",. Pl 0 ,. I;::+) , ~ '""I ;'o'Q s:- _ r;; cr 0 :;! ~ ~ 5 5 ~ ::r l1l d 0 I:j ~ 0 ::l _. n 0 , ;J>(JQ::l _ ....... 0.. (1) ~ 0 _ ::l o..em ~ '""I I 0 (JQ ::r l!;. ~::l .......::r Pl 8- ::r VI I>; lI> - ..... l1l .... .... lI> "d ::l 0 C a o..::rs::l g[{:::;'O'"i-o..::l(l:>~t.n ~ ~"d s:- n ;;:;-"-< ~ ffi ~ -3 a J" D.: 0.. 0.. (Il'""l-o...... n- <: n IS 0.. ~ ~ 3 g' ~::l VI ~ ~ ~ ~ O;j a \ rm(llSl1lS ~s:-~-o..:::-:g~gEi Pl'" Il)co-na NOO_ tIl~(Il:3I:j~:G.e; Z::l~::r::ls::3 ~5g.PlM._Sos:-~~15~;.~g :::;. (JQ :;-' << << 0 (JQ Pl n <: <: ::l '< (1) lI> l1l \ '.J (") q ~ (") - (ll ~ i:l - <'l:I ..... ~ c .... ~ " "" \<-t'l '4 1::'/ r-" '" , g~!!.g;~~6~Qgg; S C'" Pl 0.. So::l :1 ..... I:j ::l c.. "d Ul C ..... l1l ~ b" ft ::t :!? !:; ....... -<::l e. 0 ::l e. c. ;:;0 Pl Pl 2.(t ~-.<"""e ~o 0....., g:::l'< r;; g ~>E..o::l ~D'" (Il- _n;:rO PlO"'p.:l(ll .... (til-< ::r (ll ~ g (') !l ~ Q) !:; Pl Ul .... _,::r.... Pl ~ (1) -~ 0:I::e: Pl(JQ - <:'< (ll ~- .....,o~ ::rog Pl lI>'<l1l ~(Il~~So::lr;;O'" xSOl1lIl)....g(ll !l o....n(ll<VI~::r-oa .... (Il (Il (Il ~..... 0 (1:1 Pl <: SoUl'S!:;,,>;;:rem 0 ~ O::l g (ll tIl - (ll ~ (ll c.. ..... ;:l. ::s gJlll1lg"ffi:ac!:;> Ul ....... tIl ......... (Il 0 (Il (1:1 l1l 0 g D"''' ~_ ~ Q) Vl r;; D.: Q) Q) ~ Q) Q) ::I Pl So _. n ;:r::l ~ S:-<=DR a (Il.:;t 58.,; ~ =""'3 -. c:r ~n -.. : l4.0 !: "!j - = ., ...' =- = co CD ~ ~ =:r c:r -c: fi:=ll CD en u:::2 :::s ~-_...... ..! ~ ~ ~rfiirlll'III1IIIIII1"1I11 'in'il:UII!'lmm~ ...J = ~ I '" .... " '1"---"'" 'IT :~~t , 1- III r- - II - I ' ~ 1-1 - ~ II I ~ I,....-~ ~ -0' "' '__' I ~ t+ I I ' fL F I ~ ~ r- - ~ _ _ I 1r I~ 1 ELEVATOR 0VERRlJN Q -.- ~ r= ~ '+' ,~ ~ r- I r---... == ~ -1- r -I = :t r~ ~ +- t:: - ..., il~ == 1= J I I = ,..,..-- .: rlr + - -11== : r" to- -'-="l.... ~ '\ P I I EAST ELEVATION I I I I 0' 8' 24' COlO~ SCl-lEDJLE: UJ/lll: Port~ Paint, Almond Blo&eom, 0001-1 Trim: portsr painl, liMa Apricot, hm-I ~ / -1 - I '" 9 'l' 9 ;., ~ ;" ~ ROCf TE~E roJRT~ R.OOR ACCENT A~14 TI-IIRD FLOOR 5T1JXO FINISl-I, PAINTED ElRCNZE .woDIZE COLOR ~ '" 6801-1 (PORTER PAINTS) ..,. SECOND FLOOR FIRST FLOOR ";' ;" _ -'Ir- ~ FEMA 40' ~ ;., ~ ;,., ~ FLOOR SEA LEVEL f' r.-:' I~ t_- J' ~ ! - L J .~ 4 PL.t rill' ~ j i J,2 ,;'\EN1 ~rR I I ELEV,.l,TOR olERIUI EXPO&ED DECORAflYE ~R EDUE5 ROO' TER~ ." Q FOURTH flOOR B 8j ~ ~ Q ~ = THIR) FLOOR ~ ~l 8j ~T~ 1- - ~ ltl d; ~ RAILI~ !:l frp. SECOND FLOOR 8j ;" ~ Fl~T FLOOR 0; .. ij> FEMA ... \ 0F9< TO 6AR.l6E ~ .., C':IROJND FlOOR 0;- ;., SEA LEva WEST ELEVATION I I I I 0' 8' 24' 40' co..oR SCJ.a)ULE: Ulll. Porl9" Paint, Alnond 6lmsClII. &601-1 Trl", f'a'l..... PaIn!, llllile Aprk:ol, b 1~.1 . . . 4'!.&1 ~ ~ ~ 1> ~ ... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -. :I: r- TI " ;U ,n -n ~ ~ .- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :I: 12'-D' ~'.~' ~'-3' .'.':l" ll7-e' IO'-~' IC'-C' Ie'-C' =J;I~ q Z :1".. ??~ 0 iiI{ -n-n~ <l! ~ 11!!' ~[ =t -Rill "I ~[ ~ . ~ ~ ~- lEll' -f l..~ ~ tI1 0 [;\ ~ ~ 1-3 ~ J>, ~ q HJ'.'O' ~ ~~~--- ~ ~~i: .....- g; -0 2i rr- j!lP ~~ ~~ i~ f I l' / L- PLAf\ SL. h CIT\ C'f- C,- i~~~~ -~Iil~-.. inOl~ ill~~~ O() ~~ ~~ ~j ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~~~ C?! en 0 if~~ ~ Ii" "'l "lIlIO ~ .. "'F !!~fJ1 !Hr s~ tr:l ~ iOl Jf ~ .... tr:l --'\I' f~ '" .." ~ 5~~ ~l:>:r: ... !il!l4~ r= ~ .m !ll~r- ::I ~!;p' ....-c ! ~ge 0 i ~..- -:.. Z r-t:-:' .... ~~~ Q 60'-1:" o 2 4 6'-'51 'jl'.S' 'D'.S' IC'-!l' ,- m ill ~ II: g ~ r ~ jD ~ i l ~~ ~ ~ - rr:- - \' I -" \ \ I I i li L r . \'~ I'Nr, 2, S plJl.NN', '- ERVICE ,r, S ClE RW A _ ("TV O~ 4~'-!y ~ ~ "1J ~ ~i \00 0"""" c ~Jl '""f!:::e en (')G> ('.:) m r-'O c;..:l ~ ~tB ~ ~ ~~ c:=o m c:=o ...... ~~ QJ mm AJ~ ~ tll:E I m sa )> ~m C/l _C/l ::l:' -l "'-l S tri -m " -...... \lr< ~ Go, tri -< -< )> )- :j -l ...... ~ 0 Z I ~ \:! ~ ~ .. ~ ~ 0 8 =1 ~ ;J1 \'1. ~ ~ ~ iil =1 AI -" ~ '" !l:Z 1'0 [";;tl ~~ 11m r< ~ >- -l 5 Z 1>C/l 1'0 ~, c:: <i:-l :r: \1m r< tri -< > -l o Z l) tr- ~ n U'II ~ig~~ .tit - - fa .....:u~u~ o (l (11:;'- ~~{~if ~~~L ~~ g~ "'-" '-0 ~~ n I [[] - ~~ -, --rt\ UD ~-I I ~ 1 -p-{-LL+ ., iO . 1 1<75 '" . I~ " ~~ I (;;'!i, -l'= I ~ " 10 " 2 @ ~ 2:~a ~a P- O; ~ "1 g i'{ ~ AI =1 .. .- z .. G '2 ~ ~o_ -< ~ Q ;n ,lJ ;n ~ r~ ~ (J " ~ '" '-~m rm ;U 8 ~ ~HJ 8 AJ " ~~i " AI Ai ;i ~ AJ il " " - I >-- I N ~ ! ~ ~ ~ ~... '" ~ o * z ~ 0 ~ tT1 ...... ~ <: a - o t:J Ul La RIsa II Condomimums Clearwater, Flonm.. f'! '" ;;:: ~ ~ ! "I ; ~~~ n:t:>-r ~'fll'" oOi- ri=l ~ ~;. z~fll I!'~.. "'. 1" - ~'-;;: :'; "-G o~~ ~~ ~~ <3.D~i]i]!'fi] A][f(];[Joofri](];fr&"l o OO(]; 0 2424 C U ~LEW RO n Lie AA C{lOQS,(1JI P"'L.M HAftEj:DR' FI,.ORIDA .l'(58J. 7:z7-7~1-s.e.e.5 r.. 1!1-0"2S::io www \Jk...r"l:JIr~1i eo..... ~--~,- .'d'olo -" ,!,s?,r- "0 ~ ?,O~ ~ '~p !I! i. --3 , it I d. 'I. t=! j; 1 I- II ~9:l Ii liIi~lit I"l ~ 'I lit liii2 ~ I i Ill! J I II ii i=i h I ,I I II I I !uh l!lll hi.. ~ .1 , " I; ~ '" a n .. ~ - s . I ~ ... I . <; i I 8 I ~ I ' ,'- -.-- ------- ~ ~ III o " ~ ill c; ~,~..;;;; - - ~ -. - .... "" -.. . · l' t1 I I · n II 11 I .111 fl '''1 I II.} I 11 !III .I ! ~~ il ill!IJI I j I I I ! I I! I; 1(' r II fr ;' I I I I' I g' f I I II " '{ ,I' d: I,! d Ii !II I ]!a,I: I !ih J 't t I I f I I 'I" ,..' I I j , ;; . 1 It lfU i i; j i H if I n i llii li!j I I' II r- III 1 . · (Its I I II lit l J ,:. I I t I .; : ! t ! ~ I ~I," i 'I :r "! t I, i I ili I I. I} I, I i I ; , 1 jll: " I I! 1 B I II I I i I 1 I '1 ' if, · i i 't r j I 'f I I Ihff l. I' I 1 i. mill' biiiiii l~ Ill' li!j ~ jli Ii 11 ;; Illf.1 ~ I J ~ ~~ff J I tltll q 'I ~ ;uh i f~!f I H ~ll'! i' It 'I~H~f ~ '.l'lt 1,1 II lIt if d ~.;!. roll I fill [Ill l~~~g~ f. I( I ~ll i!} ; ~ ' F I II ! tit f: L ! '. t 11 jl I \' I ft i {II. J', f. I J j 1 1 IJ (, It , il1Iahr~l. · I I I' ~I g I y .! I ~ tl If (I · 'I" I' · 'I' Jl ., II Ill' jll} ;~ J ~.lll )> .1, I 'i' ,I!i f )> P :11I~! f.; 'tal I il . till '11 I . II' J 111 I III 1 II! ~ f 1 I I I . {it ,I}.... } 1" 1 i ,I If' ., 11111 th f I , J 1 I If' I f n · 1 ; l I~f ; f ij ! I I: J5 I:. f I I " I . 5J l i I! I t f r~ I i Ii NIl'. ii i t " .1 I. 1 ! if iiJ n H I I J fl. I' U 1 LA RlSA II Kl fTI11AYAC ~A")."'- 'CIATL'" INC '^'~ ~t.Cttn. L"l.NHG RAOCUf'fE DEVELDPWENT. L.l...C ..._........__ 2424 CURLEW RoAD .!!'!,. ............'U:IIt._ PAUl HARBOR. F1.. 34683 =- ;::: _t--........... CLEARWATER. FLORIDA LANDSCAPE PLAN ....---- --...- .. ;p I ...... @~ ~o ":AJ :0 ~c ;8 'ij @~ ~ !'(- 1:\" f./J 2m-'l ::j ~ I'-' ~ z: g ~ 0 ." ,... w 8 :AJ '" 0 ..,. -; :c 'Tl l' 0 0 :AJ "'0 {""" >- Z fB.~ pc j;, 0 :0 i>'Tl ~-l (jtT1 :AJ ;;>:l >- () m "'0 {""" >- Z J ~ -~--I-- -~~ ~~-~~-~-------~~ .- I ~ r.- ~~ I --, I I I ,-- I I , i . , I I I : ~ " ~ -~I r--~I ~=:I I-~I I I I I I I I L~--, It' l> 1)1 r~~ n n_nn -----1- ------ ---- l' ~ rn ~~ ,.... 'Tl t"'" o o ;;>:l "'0 r >- Z rol-"c-'; o;n ~~ ......11<I1 ~ ~ ''''' I I I I I I l.... " , r ~ ~ T---------~~.~i; i - - - - i :: I i l t..:-:~_-~-_-_-_-_~_:::'=_l_ _ _ _ J ~ "- ,-------~-------~ I . I 11':1- .--.....-.. --- ~ ~--~------~ L" --- 1'i ~.......---. --- -- , tot Inll ~~ P' n~g lil::: ~ In H~ ~ ~ "'tl"Ti -...... P.:l 0 ::3 0 I:/l '""'t La Rlsa II Condoffilmums Clearwater, Flonu .) "} I Jl"tIDj tl' I <( 1,,11,\, , :. ;]t,tl.tl '; r,~' Il' ("i < [~~ffljl h'i Ii ,;hj , ~ Ii I ~ t ~ ~ <-t;'l,';j,l; t~ , .Jl,!lt ~1 t "'-I ~;:3:h '111111j H , ,\lj1 " <.lI {. ~<j"j ;t~ i+Hj 'Jl ,':1: ,.j j \~" ' t"f- 1 :b'\\ 1+', ~~ ~~hp- ~ J:.. :t..~~J ".r;: . ,. \ I -' :P"'~ r'1 "l -<'~..v I .L~;7~ u ~~ , tr t ir .1; " '" ~ i " '" ~ ~~ ~~ i!< t nl " ~ ()~ JJ] :<2: m O~ :Jl> .".~ c::- O 0(;) Ci) r-O N m ~m O.:l = ~ r-o..J ~ ":;0 = = m ~=l - 9~ lQJ mITt ;g~ =l ~~ ~~ ."Keefe ~1.t.:hitC4'::ts illt:. :2 424 CU FH.E:W RO Fl lie AA CQoos"o p....LM HARIilOR FLORID'/!' UG8J. 727-7.fl.-:H;.e;~ r.....;( 7.eI-D255 ....ww I;IlI!iII..F..cn:k lI:om