Loading...
11/29/1988 MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 29, 1988 - 1:30 PM Members Present: Chairman Johnson, Ms. Nixon, Messrs. Hamilton, Hogan, and Schwob Also present: M. A. Galbraith, Jr., City Attorney Members Absent: Messrs. Ferrell and Green A. Motion was made by Mr. Hogan, seconded by Mr. Hamilton, to continue approval of the minutes of the November 15, 1988 meeting to the meeting of December 13, 1988. Motion carried unanimously (5 to 0). Chairman Johnson outlined the procedures for conditional uses and advised that anyone adversely affected by a decision of the Planning and Zoning Board, with regard to conditional uses, has two weeks from this date in which to file an appeal through the City Clerk's Office. Florida Law requires any party appealing a decision of this Board to have a record of the proceedings to support the appeal. ITEMS ARE LISTED IN AGENDA ORDER THOUGH NOT NECESSARILY DISCUSSED IN THAT ORDER. B. Conditional Uses: 1. (CONTINUED FROM 11/15/88) Lot 14, Blk. 16, Milton Park (724 Tuskawilla) Edward & James White VFW Post 10304/Archie Marks CU 88-96 Request - 11-C (On Premise Consumption of Alcoholic Beverages) Zoned - P/SP (Public/Semi-Public) Ms. Harvey advised as follows: This is a request for on premise consumption of alcoholic beverages in the Public/Semi-Public zoning district; the specific State license being applied for is a new 11-C license which is issued to fraternal organizations; the governing sections of the Land Development Code are Sections 136.024 and 136.025(b); the Traffic Engineer expressed concern regarding the amount of parking on site as it would relate to the establishment if it were considered to be a bar; parking requirements have been met in regard to this use, the site plan has been approved and certified, and applicant has obtained its Certificate of Occupancy; and, the Police Department, in its initial comments, saw no reason to deny license to applicant. Ms. Harvey stated no variance to separation distance will be required. Ms. Harvey advised a letter of objection from the Church of God on Myrtle Avenue and a letter of objection from Ms. Irma Ezelle were received at the meeting on November 15, 1988. Ms. Harvey stated this request was continued from the November 15, 1988 meeting in order for staff to obtain further information from the Police Department regarding activities at the subject location. She stated the Police Department reviewed their records and provided information to staff, and the Police Department summarized that the VFW is located closely to two residences. She also stated the Police Department suggested a privacy fence be installed on the VFW's property. She further stated the Police Department found that all calls made to the department voicing concerns occurred in 1986 and 1987, which is prior to the use of the property by the VFW. She added the Police Department advised no calls were received by in 1988 and no written complaints were filed regarding the property. Ms. Harvey advised staff recommended approval of the above request subject to the following: 1) That the alcoholic beverage license be obtained within 6 months. Mr. Archie Marks, Commander of VFW Post 10304, appeared to answer the Board's questions. After questioning by Board members, Mr. Marks advised as follows: The VFW has been in operation at the subject location for approximately six months; it is unknown who occupied the property previously; he felt if there were complaints about the VFW the Police should issue a citation; there are approximately 180 members, 12 to 15 of whom are active members and if there is a party there may be more people; the VFW will make sure that people will not loiter and that the parking lot is cleared of people and vehicles after the club is closed; and, the membership consists mostly of World War II veterans. No persons appeared to speak in support of or in opposition to the above request. Mr. Hamilton felt the property was very well maintained but expressed concern about the close proximity of neighbors. He felt, though a fence is not required to be installed, the club should consider installing a fence. Mr. Hamilton felt the installation of a fence should not be a condition of approval. He felt it was worthy to note that there haven't been complaints since the club opened and suggested that possibly the complaints were about another group of people. Ms. Nixon expressed concern regarding compatibility and stated she is not in favor of the request. Mr. Schwob felt the older membership of the club would made a good neighbor. Mr. Hogan felt there should be no problems as long as members leave the parking lot when the club is closed. Motion was made by Mr. Schwob, seconded by Mr. Hogan, to approve the above request subject to the following: 1) That the alcoholic beverage license be obtained within 6 months. Motion carried (4 to 1) with Ms. Nixon voting "nay." 2. Part Lots 1 and 4, Lot 2, Blk. C, Island Estates, Unit 5 (20 Island Way) Twenty Island Way, Inc. (The Flagship Restaurant)/Daniel Simmons CU 88-107 Request - 4-COP-SRX (On Premise Consumption of Alcoholic Beverages) Zoned - CG (General Commercial) Ms. Harvey advised as follows: This is a request for on premise consumption of alcoholic beverages in the General Commercial zoning district; the specific request is for a change of business ownership, which actually occurred a couple of years ago, of an existing 4-COP-SRX State license; the governing sections of the Land Development Code are Sections 136.024 and 136.025(b); the Traffic Engineer had no comment; and, the Police Department saw no reason to deny license to applicant. Ms. Harvey stated no variances to separation distance are required. She also stated that, after filing the application, the restaurant was destroyed by fire. Ms. Harvey stated she hoped the restaurant would be in operation very soon as it is a much needed facility. Ms. Harvey advised staff recommended approval of the above request. Atty. Timothy A. Johnson, Jr., representative of applicant, stated Twenty Island Way, Inc. is seeking technical approval of the change of business ownership which occurred in 1986. He stated that, through an oversight, the subject request has not been before this Board for approval. After questioning by Mr. Schwob, Mr. Johnson advised as follows: It is anticipated the exterior will essentially be the same but the interior will be different; and, there has been no problem complying with the 51% food sales requirement. After questioning by Mr. Hogan, Ms. Harvey advised as follows: This particular request happened at a time when the new Land Development Code was being instituted; Occupational Licenses was previously part of another department but now that Occupational Licenses is part of Planning and Development and part of the review process, more of this type of request should be discovered; another problem that occurs with change of business ownership is that the State does not require zoning approval; and, the State has been notified that Clearwater requires zoning approval of a change of business ownership and applicants are required to come before this Board for review. She added that the City is not involved in the State's review process on requests for approval of a change of ownership. She also added that Occupational Licenses are issued one time a year and the license can continue to be operated under by the new owner until the completion of that one year. She advised that a new business owner may be in operation several months before it is discovered as notices are sent out one time a year. She also advised that City manpower does not give staff the ability to do daily or weekly checks on incoming businesses and it is only the once-a-year notice of Occupational License that allows the City to discover changes in business ownership. No persons appeared in support of or in opposition to the above request. Motion was made by Mr. Hamilton, seconded by Mr. Schwob, to approve the above request. Motion carried unanimously (5 to 0). 3. Lots 7 through 13 and 15 through 20, Blk. B. Bayside Sub. #5 (678 Gulfview Boulevard South) E & G Investors, Inc., Gregory Politis and Elias Anastasopoulos (Walgreen Co.)/ Mudano Assoc. CU 88-108 Request - 3-PS (Package Sales of Alcoholic Beverages) Zoned - CB (Beach Commercial) Ms. Harvey advised as follows: This is a request for package sales of alcoholic beverages in the Beach Commercial zoning district; the specific request is for a new 3-PS State license; the governing sections of the Land Development Code are Sections 136.024 and 136.025(b); applicant is seeking conditional use approval of package sales out of a new Walgreen's Drug Store proposed to be located on south Clearwater Beach; the site is being redeveloped into a drug store, a continuation of the time share development, and retail shops; the site plan has been reviewed by the City Commission and forwarded to staff for final approval; the Traffic Engineer had no objection; and, the Police Department saw no reason to deny license to applicant. Ms. Harvey stated no variances to the separation distance are required. Ms. Harvey advised staff recommended approval of the above request subject to the following: 1) That the Building permit be obtained in accordance with the time limitations imposed on the site plan. After questioning by Ms. Nixon, Ms. Harvey stated no variance to separation distance is required because of the type of license requested and the manner in which the site is configured. Mr. John P. Ehrig, representative of applicant, stated no variances are required. He felt that applicant is in compliance with the Code. No persons appeared in support of or in opposition to the above request. Ms. Harvey stated one notice of support was received from Dorrice Tipton, 675 South Gulfview Boulevard. Motion was made by Mr. Schwob, seconded by Mr. Hamilton, to approve the above request subject to the following: 1) That the Building permit be obtained in accordance with the time limitations imposed on the site plan. Motion carried unanimously (5 to 0). 4. Lots 7 through 11, J. B. Roberts Sub. AND Portion of Pom's Park Sub. lying south of Pinellas Street plus vacated right of way of Hamlet Avenue and part of vacated right-of-way of Tuskawilla Street (509 1/2 Pinellas Street) Morritt Homes, Inc. (Mighty Kleen Cars)/Lee Arnold Mgmt. Services CU 88-109 Request - Vehicle Service (Auto Detailing) Zoned - IL (Limited Industrial) Ms. Harvey advised as follows: This is a request for vehicle service in the Limited Industrial zoning district; the governing sections of the Land Development Code are Sections 136.025(b) and (c)(27); the request is for establishing an automobile detailing business; and, the Traffic Engineer had no objection if adequate parking is provided. Ms. Harvey stated applicant indicated on the drawing that adequate parking as required by Code is available to accommodate the subject use. Ms. Harvey advised staff recommended approval of the above request subject to the following: 1) That the Occupational License be procured within 6 months; and, 2) That there be no vehicle repair at the subject location. Mr. Bruce Heisler, representative of applicant, stated only auto detailing is performed by the applicant. After questioning by Board members, Mr. Heisler advised as follows: Automobile detailing includes cleaning the exterior; automobile detailing includes cleaning and vacuuming the interior; an older looking vehicle is made to look as new as possible; the only painting that is done is touching up nicks and is done within the building; there is no body work done; the engines are steamed cleaned; and, neither tire changing nor repair is done on site. No persons appeared in support of or in opposition to the above request. Motion was made by Mr. Schwob, seconded by Mr. Hamilton, to approve the above request subject to the following: 1) That the Occupational License be procured within 6 months; and, 2) That there be no vehicle repair at the subject location. Motion carried unanimously (5 to 0). 5. Part Lot 1, Lots 2, 3, 4, 24 & 25, Blk. B, Bayside Sub. No. 5 (630 Gulfview Boulevard South) Elias Anastasopoulos (Jo-Go Amusement Center) CU 88-110 Request - Outdoor Commercial Recreation/Entertainment Zoned - CB (Beach Commercial) Ms. Harvey advised as follows: This is a request for the expansion of an outdoor commercial recreation area on south Clearwater Beach in the Beach Commercial zoning district; the governing sections of the Land Development Code are Sections 136.025(b) and (c)(21); this request includes a request to eliminate a condition of approval of October 18, 1988, which condition imposed a closing time of 11:30 PM; and, the Traffic Engineer, in reviewing the subject request, had no comment. Ms. Harvey also advised as follows: On October 18, 1988, this Board approved a conditional use to allow improvement and expansion of an existing miniature golf operation; approval was conditioned for a portion identified as Phase I and the conditions of approval of Phase I included no consumption of alcoholic beverages on the premises, no external speakers, lights off at 11:30 PM, and all lighting be directed to minimize any glare beyond the property lines; at the October 18 meeting, applicant indicated to the Board that the conditions of approval posed no problem; and, following the meeting, applicant contacted staff that he had two concerns, one being the limitation on the hours of operation to the extent that without any improvements to the property he is permitted to operate later than 11:30 PM and one being the economics of the project indicate he will not be able to cover his initial costs for the project without being able to go forward with the additional 18 holes of golf. Ms. Harvey further advised as follows: Staff explained to applicant the only adjustments that could be made to the previous approval is to file another application in the form of an amendment and come before this Board; regardless of the action on the subject request, Phase I is approved with the stated conditions unless this Board decided to amend the condition of approval of October 18, 1988 regarding limitation of hours; the application specifically requests a change in the hours of operation to have the last guest enter the property at 11:59 PM; applicant is also proposing to amend the development plan to build a parking structure that is less than what was first planned; the first application proposed a two-level structure over the parking lot and the top level would contain the additional 18 holes of golf; and, this application proposes one level over the parking lot with the 18 holes of golf on the top level. Ms. Harvey stated staff recommended approval on the first application, which application was more extensive than the subject application. She also stated the lessening of the development or the impact should allay some concerns expressed at the previous meeting. Ms. Harvey further stated this Board approved Phase I only with the intent to give the applicant an opportunity exhibit his ability to operate this facility in accordance with the conditions of approval imposed and to display to those in opposition that there would not be problems at the facility. After questioning by Mr. Hogan, Ms. Harvey stated it is her understanding the parking lot will have a deck with the 18 holes of golf on the deck. After questioning by Ms. Nixon, Ms. Harvey stated if any changes are made to a conditional use approval it must be done by this Board and a conditional use is not based on economic hardship. She added that most times, with conditional use requests, economics are essential and are often the only reason an applicant comes before this Board. Ms. Harvey stated one notice of support was received from Dorrice Tipton, 675 South Gulfview Boulevard. Ms. Harvey stated a petition, with 46 signatures of individuals residing on Clearwater Beach, had been presented in opposition to the subject request. Atty. Harry Cline, representative of applicant, advised as follows: The property is zoned Beach Commercial and is a relatively large piece of land; the property is adjacent to commercial facilities on the east, motel/hotels and restaurants to the south, motels and apartments/condominiums on the north, and a gas station/convenience store operation to the west; the present and past use of the property is miniature golf; this request is to allow expanded outdoor recreation, specifically an additional 18 holes of miniature golf; upon review, applicant determined it was necessary to know at this time for economic reasons and due to development costs whether the second phase can be developed; and, previously there was concern regarding two levels of parking, but now parking is proposed only on ground level with 18 holes of miniature golf on the deck above the parking. Mr. Cline pointed out on the site plan submitted with the application the height of the project as it was requested on October 18, the height of the project as it was approved on October 18, and the height of the project as it is currently proposed. He advised the proposed plan will have reduced parking and reduced height. He also advised the proposed plan does not require any variances for parking. Mr. Cline stated the current operation is too small and too outdated. Mr. Cline stated as follows: Miniature golf is a family activity and is a good outlet for tourists with families; there are no family-oriented, recreation facilities, with the exception of the subject facility, on Clearwater Beach; the request is consistent with the beach zoning and land use; there will be virtually no traffic impact; all required parking has been provided; noise and lights will not be a problem; the present owner has never received complaints about his business; and, the criteria of the Code has been met. Mr. Cline felt there would only be a positive impact on the area; the presence of adults at the facility will help keep rowdiness to a minimum; and, there would be no decrease in property values. After questioning by Board members, Mr. Bill Walters, architect for applicant, advised as follows: The structural deck is 10 feet and the other 10 feet in height is to create contour and use for landscaping; the previous plan contained ground level parking plus one additional level of parking plus one level of miniature golf; and, the current plan contains ground level parking plus one level of miniature golf. Mr. Walters also explained the topography and height of the structures. After further questioning by Mr. Schwob, Mr. Cline advised applicant stated customers are on the golf course for approximately one hour and applicant's demand is usually until around 11:00 PM. Mr. Cline requested a condition of approval state that last ticket sales be at 11:00 or 11:30 PM or that lights be turned off at 12:00 midnight or 12:30 AM. He added the present 11:30 PM lights off restrictions requires that the last tickets be sold at 10:30 PM. In support of the above request, the following persons appeared to give their comments: Mr. Michel Hamel, owner of property at 620 Bayway Boulevard, stated he supports the project because Clearwater Beach currently has no entertainment. He stated this causes a problem trying to get tourists to the beach. He added there is no recreation for the family and the project is a good project for a family-oriented beach. Ms. Ann Garris, 38 Acacia, felt the miniature golf course could not generate any more noise than what is generated by traffic on Bayway Boulevard. She also felt that out of self-preservation the applicant would not allow teenagers to congregate at the facility. She felt the project was exciting for the area and a long-needed project. She stated the beach needs something different. She stated the beach does not need another lounge. After questioning by Mr. Schwob, Ms. Garris stated she felt, since she lived on north Clearwater Beach, she was not in a position to answer whether allowing the lights to remain on until 12:30 AM would out of keeping with other activities in the area. Mr. Gionis, 61 Midway Island, stated he has been a resident businessman on Clearwater Beach for a number of years and he felt the project would improve the image of Clearwater Beach. He felt the family-oriented facility will give people on Clearwater Beach something to enjoy. Mr. Greg Politis, 678 Gulfview Boulevard, stated he owns a resort a few hundred feet distant from the subject facility. He stated the tourists go to the beach during the day but they have nothing to go to in the evening. He stated the subject property needs updated. He advised other beach cities have similar projects and felt the project was a necessity for Clearwater Beach. Mr. Dean Anderson, 1755 Sharondale, felt the beach does need more family entertainment. He commented that family time is mainly during the summer and during the summer it doesn't get dark until 9:00 PM. He stated many people are visiting the beach until sunset and 11:00 PM during the summer is not considered late. He felt there was a need for activities for the family until midnight. In opposition to the above request, the following persons appeared to give their comments: Ms. Janet Nassif, Continental Towers, 675 South Gulfview Boulevard, stated residents spoke in opposition to the project on October 18 and she felt an equitable solution was reached. She felt the applicant knew the economics of the situation. She stated the hours of operation of the project were discussed very carefully at the previous meeting and the applicant felt the hours of operation were acceptable. She stated nothing has been said about the video games proposed for the project and she felt video games were a classic gathering place for teenagers. She felt it would be older crowds at the facility after 10:30 PM. She stated the one letter of support that was received was from a former owner. She stated, though there are no alcoholic beverages on the subject property, alcoholic beverages are available at the Pick Kwik adjacent to the subject property and Walgreen's just had package sales approved. She requested the Board give careful consideration to the subject request. She stated the residents also pay taxes. She felt everyone should work together and felt Phase I should be sufficient. Ms. Ann Unger, 640 Bayway Boulevard South, #203, stated she was very much in opposition to the project when it was before the Board in October. She stated she is not as opposed as she previously was, but she felt some of the items brought up at the first meeting should be continued, such as the lights out at midnight, no external speakers, lighting shields directed downward, and if security or trash became a problem applicant verbally agreed action would be taken. Mr. Peter Zhun, 675 South Gulfview Boulevard, stated he doesn't understand why this item is being heard. He felt nothing new has been submitted. He felt the hours of operation should not be extended. He felt having last tickets sold at 10:30 PM was reasonable but 11:59 PM means the lights won't be turned off until 1:30 AM because of cleanup. He felt Phase I should only be approved to see how it works out before an expansion is approved. Ms. Ellen Zhun, 675 South Gulfview Boulevard, read a letter of opposition to the Board (see attached), which stated Phase I was approved with the express stipulation that nothing would be done with Phase II until Phase I was complete and in operation, which would allow the City to evaluate the benefits versus the disadvantages to the community. She felt it is inconceivable for the Board to consider Phase II. She stated the year-round residents had every right to expect a reasonable atmosphere of security and enjoyment. In rebuttal, Mr. Cline stated there are restaurants and hotels in the area and there is a lot of activity going in the neighborhood at a later hour. He felt the hours of operation requested are not unreasonable. He stated since the Police substation is across the street there will not be a lot of rowdiness. He stated applicant meets criteria of the Code. He stated applicant is focusing on the family/tourist trade entertainment which doesn't currently exist. He stated the subject property is commercial beach property and Beach Commercial zoning. Mr. Hamilton stated he understands the feeling of the residents and felt there is somewhat of a problem with the commercial and residential areas. He stated he is excited about the development of the property because the development will clear up an eyesore area of the beach. He felt the project was a good idea with good people involved. He stated applicant also pays very high taxes. Mr. Hamilton felt applicant was trying to alleviate some of the concerns of residents. He felt the project would be a beautiful addition to the beach and he felt the noise will be a lot less than from the 24-hour operations in the area. He felt if there is a serious question on the hours of operation, a condition of approval for one year could be included but the condition should only be on the hours of operation. He stated he is very much in favor of the project. Mr. Hogan felt the property is currently an eyesore. He also felt the project will be a good, family project for the beach. He stated that he felt the project does not need to be open until 1:00 AM. Mr. Hogan felt most of the opposition is to the hours of operation. He felt family people will not be out at 1:00 AM and felt the lights should be turned off at midnight. Ms. Nixon stated she is more comfortable with the present request than with the previous request but felt the lights should be turned off at midnight. Mr. Schwob felt the lights should be turned off at either 12:00 midnight or 12:30 AM. He felt this project is different from the first project in that the two-level parking garage has been eliminated. Motion was made by Mr. Schwob, seconded by Mr. Hamilton, the approve the above request subject to the following: 1) That there be no consumption of alcoholic beverages on the premises; 2) That there be no external speakers; 3) That the lights be turned off at 12:00 midnight; and, 4) That the lighting be directed to minimize any glare beyond the property lines. Motion carried unanimously (5 to 0). C. Annexation and Zoning: 1. Lot 3, Blk. D, Oak Acres Add. Sub. (Located on the north side of Lakeview Road, east of Duncan Avenue) (Pappas) A 88-35 Request - Annexation and Zoning, RS-6 (Single Family Residential "Six") The above property is located on the north side of Lakeview Road, east of Duncan Avenue. The applicant was not present. Ms. Harvey advised as follows: This is a request for annexation and RS-6 (Single Family Residential "Six") zoning; there is an existing single family residence on the property; and, City sewer and water and natural gas are available. Ms. Harvey advised staff recommended approval of the request for annexation and RS-6 (Single Family Residential "Six") zoning. No persons appeared in support of or in opposition of the above request. Motion was made by Mr. Hogan, seconded by Mr. Schwob, to recommend approval of the request for annexation and RS-6 (Single Family Residential "Six") zoning. Motion carried unanimously (5 to 0). D. Annexation, Zoning, Land Use Plan Amendment, and Local Planning Agency Review 1. M&B 13.15, Sec. 12-29S-15E (Located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Hercules Avenue and Palmetto Street) (DEM Partnership) A 88-34 LUP 88-25 Request - Annexation and Zoning, IL (Limited Industrial) Land Use Plan: FROM: Commercial/Tourist Facilities TO: Industrial The above property is located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Hercules Avenue and Palmetto Street. The applicant was not present. Ms. Harvey stated it is not necessary that the above item be continued unless the Board feels the item should be continued. Ms. Harvey advised as follows: This is a request for annexation and IL (Limited Industrial) zoning and a Land Use Plan amendment from Commercial/Tourist Facilities to Industrial; the property is presently vacant and an office/warehouse use is proposed; and, City sewer and water and natural gas are available. Ms. Harvey stated a site plan, approved under the jurisdiction of the County, for the subject property has been given a courtesy review and it was suggested to the applicant that the building be relocated. Ms. Harvey advised staff recommended approval of the request for annexation and IL (Limited Industrial) zoning and a Land Use Plan amendment from Commercial/Tourist Facilities to Industrial. No persons appeared in support of or in opposition to the above request. Motion was made by Mr. Hamilton, seconded by Mr. Schwob, to recommend approval of the request for annexation and IL (Limited Industrial) zoning and a Land Use Plan amendment from Commercial/Tourist Facilities to Industrial. Motion carried unanimously (5 to 0). 2. Lot 1, Blk. 3, Acker's Sub. (Located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Charles Avenue and Daniel Street) (Maher/Vogel) A 88-36 LUP 88-26 Request - Annexation and Zoning, OL (Limited Office) Land Use Plan: FROM: Low Density Residential TO: Residential/Office The above property is located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Charles Avenue and Daniel Street. Mr. Donald Francis, representative of property owners, explained the uses of the surrounding property. He stated the Limited Office zoning is requested, there will be no structure on the property, and the property will be used for retention and parking. Ms. Harvey advised as follows: This is a request for annexation and OL (Limited Office) zoning and a Land Use Plan amendment from Low Density Residential to Residential/Office; the request for annexation is prompted by the ability to join the subject property with a project proposed to be built in the City on the north side of Daniel Street; it is applicant's intent to use the property for parking in support of the proposed office development; City sewer is not currently available and if the property is developed, sewer would be required to be extended to the property; City water is not available nor is natural gas; Public Works advised that, in order for the property to be contiguous to City limits, it would be necessary to include in the annexation the abutting right-of-way of Daniel Street; and, in regard to the Land Use Plan amendment, the City would not want to extend Limited Office any farther. Ms. Harvey advised staff recommended approval of the request for annexation and OL (Limited Office) zoning and a Land Use Plan amendment from Low Density Residential to Residential/Office. After questioning by Mr. Schwob, Ms. Harvey stated if a parking lot is proposed she thought a conditional use would be required. No persons appeared in support of or in opposition to the above request. Motion was made by Mr. Schwob, seconded by Mr. Hamilton, to recommend approval of the request for annexation and OL (Limited Office) zoning and a Land Use Plan amendment from Low Density Residential to Residential/Office. Motion carried unanimously (5 to 0). F. Director's Items Ms. Harvey advised the Board that the annual Planning and Zoning Board Christmas Luncheon will be held before the meeting scheduled for December 13, 1988. She added the luncheon will begin at 12:00 Noon and the meeting will begin at 2:00 PM. She also added that written notice will be sent to the members in a few days. Meeting adjourned at 3:25 PM.