FLS2004-09064
L
,..-
OIGINAL
\~
\
,"-
, ~~J
.....
~ Clearwater
o~
~
Planning Department
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone 727-562-4567
Fax 727"562-4865
CASE #.
DATE RECEIVED
RECEIVED BY (staff Initials)
ATLAS PAGE #
ZONING DISTRICT
L/1"!D USE CLASSIFICATION, ,
SURROUNDING USES OF AD!JACENT
PROPERTIES
NORTH
SOUTH
WEST
EAST
a SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
o SUBMlT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including
1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans
o SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ 10000
11< NOTE 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS)
FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
Single Family (LDR or LMDR only) Residential Infill Project (Revtsed IllI8/03)
-PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT ~
A APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202 A) i
APPLICANT NAME Wlsne Develoomen!. LLC
,
MAILING ADDRESS 3408 Beacon Street Pomoano Beach. Fl 33602 I
PHONE NUMBER 248-737-7247 FAX NUMBER - ,
~ -----..- ~ -~ ~-~ -
i (--. Ie:: /~ Ir::! ~ \VI - ,..- -.....
PROPERTY OWNER(S) W"",, O".loom,"!. LLe : I l ) b ~ 6 o/J ~ ,\
\
(Must mclude ALL owners as llsled on the deed - pro~lde onglnal slgnalure(s) on p;lg~ 6 _ . <.
- ,
AGENT NAME Keith E Zayac. P E . c/o Kerth Zayac & Associates, Inc OCT 8_ .J
... \i - -
MAILING ADDRESS 701 Enterprise Road East. Ste 404, Safety Harbor, FL 34695 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
PHONE NUMBER 727-793-9888 FAX NUMBER 727-793-9855 SERVICES
CITY OF CLEARWATER I
CELL NUMBER E-MAIL ADDRESS kelth@kellhzayac com
B
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
~ ~(C~~Wre
\ j-=:l
1~~1
PL/V..JNII';"o ,
_' [,PM[NT
STREET ADDRESS of subJect site
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
PARCEL NUMBER
See attached deed
(II not listed here, please note the location 01 \hIS document In the submittal)
09/29/15/65448/000/0 1 DO. 09/29/15/65448/000/0130
,z62~ I. ~ ("~I Z'O.tJO)
(acres, square leet) , ,
PROPOSED USE(S) AND S!ZE(S) 8 smQle family lols and common area CITY ("-
(number of dwelling Utllts, hotel rooms or square footage of nonreSidential use)
""'""'---=----
r'rJ
PARCEL SIZE
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S) See attachment A
Attach sheets and be SpeClftC wnenldentlfylog the request (loclllde all requested code de~latlons e g reduc~on Ln reqUired number of parking spaces, specific use etc)
I
" ..
ORlGINAL
'\
~
"-.
DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TOR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSL Y APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO 1!... (If yes, allach a copy of the applicable document~
C PROOF OF OWNERSHIP. (Code Section 4-202 A.5)
~ SUBMIT A COpy OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATIESTING OWNERSHIP (see
page 6)
o WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS (Code Section 3-913 A)
~ Provide complete resporlses to the SIX (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explalrl how each crltena is achieved In detail
The proposed development of the land Will be Irl harmorlY With the scale, bulk, coverage, denSity and cha racter of adJacent properties I rl which It
IS located
See attachment B
2 The proposed development Will nol hlrlder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land arld bUildings or slgnlflCarltly
Impair the value thereof
See attachment B
3 The proposed developmerlt Will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working In the neighborhood of the proposed
use
See attachment B
4 The proposed development IS deslgrled to minimize traffic congestion
See attachment B
5 The proposed development IS consistent With the community character of the Immediate VIClrllty of the parcel proposed for development
See attachment B
6 The deslgrl of the proposed development mlrllmlzes adverse effects, Irlcludlng Visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation Impacts,
on adjacent properties
See attachment 8
t5J- ProVide complete responses to the seven (7) RESIDENTIAL INFllL PROJECT CRITERIA - Explam how each crllena IS achieved, In detail
The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for developme ntls otherwise Impractical Without devlalions from the Intenslly and
development standards r 0 re ~ ~ n 1\/7 ~
See attachment C u; ~ [i; U \!/ [;
2 The development of the parcel proposed for development as a reslderltlal mfill proJect Will not mat
abutting properties (Include the eXlstlrlg value of the site and the proposed value of the site With the 1m
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENl
SERVICES
CITY OF CLEARWATER
" ,
PHONE NUMBER
~ ~J~ll'\( [,t.,.- c-
'7-tl>l3 ~~lqr.-. Pt:ltrWAJJD~,-F~ ~sJoZ-
f I j
~~7~7-7Z41
Wl~e: 1?e~.g~ vvC-
FAX NUMBER
PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME
ADDRESS
APPLICANT'S NAME
ADDRESS
PHONE NUMBER
AGENT NAME
I Ue:..
ADDRESS
PHONE NUMBER
I
IZ7-79~~~
, I
I
I
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINEUlAS
Sworn to and subscribed before m.f,~hls ';;;7 day of
c-Sj p;l; , AD, ~ ~ to 'rne and/or
,
me or has produced ~, D.i. & <. 26 '-{ 1 d Y \7 it .::81.:,
as Identlfica~ Ge-h~: €)C II- -{ "1
No a Jr , - ~-
a"'- L SCHMllT
my commission e Pf \ Notary Public, ,~rate of Flonda
My comm explre~ Mar 27,2007
No DO 197463
I
ONE NUMBER OF THE PERSON PREPARING THE PLAT
ION OF THE PROPERTY WITH U S SU RVEY SECTION, TOWNSHIP AND RANGE LINES,
EXISTING AND PROPOSED RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND EASEMENTS
Page 1
- ----,
o [E~[E~~~)i
~,
I
I
PROPOSED STREET NAMES,
NAMES, APPROPRIATELY POSITIONED, OF ADJOINING PLATS,
PLANNING & OEVELOPMENl
SERVICES
CITY OF ClEAI1WA1EQ
...
Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc.
CIVil Englneenng, Landscape Architecture, Planmng
701 S Enterpnse Road E , Ste 404
Safety Harbor, FL 34695
(727) 793-9888 Phone
(727) 793-9855 Fax
kelth@kelthzavac com
October 8,2004
Mr John Schodtler
CIty of Clearwater Planning Department
100 S Myrtle Ave
Clearwater, FL 33756
~31VMH\13l0.dO AlIO
lN3WlHVd30 E>NINN\f1d
~DUZ 9 0 !~O
RE: FLS2004-09064 - 300 PALM BLUFF ST.
a3^1303~
Dear Mr Schodtler
Enclosed please find fifteen full-sIze revIsed cIvil construction plans along with
reductions of the site and landscape plan addressing the following rtems
1 The enclosed descnptlon of request has been revIsed to a breakdown per lot of
the lot Sizes, setback reductions and heIght
2 The parcel sIze has been revised to the upland portion only The overall parcel
has also been calculated and IS shown In the site plan notes
3. The cover sheet has been revised to state that the drawings are a part of a
preliminary plan ThiS not appears under the sheet Index.
4 The dImenSions and area of the overall plat, each lot and common open space
to be dedicated to the HOA are shown on the preliminary plat There IS no
proposed public nght of way or street nghts of way proposed There IS an
access, utility and drainage easement proposed, and IS shown on the
preliminary plat
,
(~
K ,th Zayac, P E , RLA
P dent
Keith Zayac & Associates, lnc
'1
OR\G1NAL
See attacl1ment C
3 The uses wlthm the resldenllallnflll proJect are olherwlse permitted m the Clly of Clearwater
See attachment C
4 The uses or mix of use wlthrn the reSidential mfill prOJect are compatible with adjacent land uses
See attachment C
5 The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential mfill prOject will upgrade the Immediate vIcinity of the parcel
proposed for development
See attachment C
6 The deSign 01 the proposed reSidential mfill prOject creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the Immediate
vIcinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwaler as a whole
See attachment C
7 FleXibility In regard 10 lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parkmg are jusllfied by the benefits to community character and the
Immediate vlcmlty of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole
See attachment C
E STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS (City of Clearwater DeSign Criteria Manual and
4.202 A 21)
'a
",.-
/-'
--;;--
-/
-r
2"
~
STORMWATER PLAN including the followmg reqUirements
EXisting topography extendmg 50 feet beyond all property lines,
Proposed gradmg mcludmg finished floor elevations of all structures,
All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems
Proposed slormwater detenllonlretenlion area including top of bank toe of slope and outlet control structure,
Storm water calculatIOns for attenuation and water quality
Signature of Flonda registered ProfeSSional Engmeer on all plans and calculations
COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL
(SWFWMD approval IS requ Ired prior to Issuance of City BUlldmg Permit), if applicable
o
COpy OF STATE AND COUNTY STORMWATER SYSTEM TIE-IN PERMIT APPLICATIONS
8 2004
o
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES
CITY OF CLEARWATER
~
I
\'
ORIGINAL
F SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS (Code Section 4-202 A)
0-- SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (rncludlng legal descnpliOn of property) - One onglnal and 14 copIes
"'lZf TREE SURVEY (lncludrng eXisting trees on site and wlthrn 25' of the adJacent SIte, by speCies, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location,
Including dnp lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please deSign around the eXlslmg trees,
P" LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY
o PARKING DEMAND STUDY In COnjUnction With a request to make deViations 10 the parking standards (Ie Reduce number of spaces) Prior to
the submittal of thiS application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Com mun Ity Development Coordmator a nd shall be In
accordance With accepted traffic englneenng principles The findings of the study Will be used In determining whether or not deI/lations to the
parking standards are approved,
lJS.. GRADING PLAN, as applicable
(fiL PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note BUilding permits Will not be Issued unlll eVld<'nce of recardlng a fmal plat IS prOVided),
o COpy OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable,
G SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202 Al
tit. SITE PLAN With the follOWing Information (not to exceed 24" x 36')
All dimenSions,
North arrow,
Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one Inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared,
location map,
Index sheet referenCing indiVidual sheets Included In package,
Footprmt and size of all EXISTING bUildings and structures,
Footpnnt and size of all PROPOSED bUildings and structures,
All reqUired setbacks,
All eXisting and proposed pOints of access,
All reqUired Sight tnangles
Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses and specimen
trees including descnptlon and 10caliOn of understory, ground cover vegetation and Wildlife habitats, etc,
Location of all public and pnvate easements,
Location of all street rights-of-way Within and adJacent to the site
LocatIOn of eXisting publiC and pnvate utilities including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and 11ft stations gas
and water lines,
All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas,
Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all reqUired parking lot interior landscaped areas,
Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outSide mechanical equipment and all reqUired screening {per
Section 3-201 (D}(I) and Index #701}
Location of all landscape matenal,
location of all onSlle and of/site storm-water management facllllles,
LocatIOn of all outdoor lighting fixtures, and
Locallon of all eXisting and proposed Sidewalks
pIi;L.. SITE DATA TABLE for eXisting reqUIred and proposed developmenl In wnllenltabular form
Land area In square feet and acres
Number of EXISTING dwelling units
Number of PROPOSED dwelling urllls,
Gross floor area devoted to each use
Parkmg spaces total number, presented In tabular form With the rlumber of reqUired spaces,
Total paved area, Including all paved parking spaces and dnveways, expressed In square feet and percerltage of the paved vehicular area,
Size and speCies of all landscape matenal,
OffiCial records book and page numbers of all eXisting utility easement.
BUilding and structure heights
Impermeable surface ratio (I S R) and
Floor area ratiO (F A R ) for all nonreSidential uses
~ REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 'h X 11) and color rendenng If possible,
OCT
8 2004
~ FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, prOVide the follOWing additional mformatlon Orl site plan
_ One-foot contours or spot elevalions on Site,
Of/site elevatIOns If reqUired to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel,
All open space areas,
Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms
Lot lines and bUilding lines (dimensioned).
Streets and dnves (dimenSioned),
BUilding and structural setbacks (dimenSioned),
Structural overhangs,
Tree I nvef1tory , prepared by a "certified arbonst of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting Size, canopy (drip lines) and condlllon of such trees
PLANNING & OEVELOPMENl
SERVICES
CITY 01- CLEr~HWATER
~
~
:[
o
o
ORIGINAL
H LAfI,lDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS (SectIOn 4.1102 A)
LANDSCAPE PLAN
All eXisting and proposed structures,
Names 01 abutting slreets,
Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations,
Dehneailon and dimenSions of all reqUired penmeter landscape buHers,
Sight vIsibility triangles,
Dellneailon and dimenSions of all parking areas Including landscaping Islands and curbing,
Proposed and reqUired parking spaces,
EXISting trees on-SIte and Immediately adJacent to the Site, by species, size and locations, including dnplrne (as Indicated on
reqUl red tree survey),
Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) Indicating the Size, descnptlon, speCifications and quantities of all eXisting and proposed
landscape materials, including botanical and common names,
Location, Size, and quantities 01 all eXisting and proposed landscape matenals Indicated by a key relaling to the plant schedule
Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, SOil mixes, backfillmg, mulching and
protective measures,
Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and Intenor landscape coverage, expreSSing In both square feel and
percentage covered
~~~:;,~~n~o~~: prevIOus development approval {e g conditions Imposed by the Community DeveljPIl10eJltJ.!,o)arre r ~ n ~ fll~
REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 'h X 11) (color rendering If pOSSible), l!; ~ l!; U I!J 6
n~
1- =
I
~-1
..--"
-\
IRRIGATION PLAN (reqUired lor level two and three approval)
COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable
OCT
B 2004
~')
--
I Pc' .,.
I -
BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS (Section 4~202 A 23) SERVICES
ReqUIred In the event the application Includes a development where deSign standards are In Issue (e gl_191Jrlsl an&6b&R,fwhIDTslr\'dt1!fJr::a~ part
01 a ComprehenSive Inllll Redevelopment PrOject or a Resldenllallnflll ProJect
K BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all Sides of all bUildings including height dimenSions, COlors and materials,
---~ RE DUCED SUI LDI NG ELEVATIONS - lour Sides of bUilding With colors and materials to scal e (8 Y, X 11) (black and white and color rendell ng II
pOSSible) as reqUired
J.
o
SIGNAGE (DIVISion 19 SIGNS I Section 3-1806) (""7l
"">1
All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs PrOVide photographs a
to remain
~~ 7~1~ k7 11 C-oM"":?
-v\Z'O~eA,,^ ')
dimenSions (area, height, etc) 'ndicate whether they Will be removed or
o All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs, PrOVide details I ludlng location, SILe, height colors materials and draWing, freestanding signs
shall Include the street address (numerals)
o ComprehenSive Sign Program application, as applicable (sepa te application and fee reqUired)
o Reduced slgnage proposal (8 '" X 11) (color), If submitting omprehenslve Sign Program application
K TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY (Section 4-202
o Include as lequlred 11 pro
T np generallon shall b
C of the Community ev
L.
'---.....
1':1 "......l \ (".:;.0 u.; >rl' I A> E
STATE OF F!::'01tIDA, COUNTY OF P,INEI,..t.J;\S _/ CT t
S orn to and subSCribed before me thiS ~ day of
-.."- r\"\ In ,> L-, A 0 20 C'~\ to me and/or by
"'e:-Lc who IS personally known has
produced tJ~-\\J ,...s . . ( (> f'> ",I as
Identlflcallon
l\.l/U ~ , ,) (JC!.M\ )
Notary publiC,
My commission explres,"- _U_ ~ __~________'_~__j
! NOTAR'-'y PUBLIC WAYNE - MI
11\1'( COM MISSION EX PI R ES AUG 17 2006
, ,
-- -~-~----- ~ ~~- ~--------'---~~
( Signature of propert
ORIGINAL
AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT
'Wl<SWE:.- -vE~.JF"'t.-\~ (.".vC-- .::.../0 AL-AW WI?J~_ .~__E:. ~~~-
. .
--.. --..
-----...-
(Names o(all property owners on deed - please PRINT full names)
That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) 01 the following descnbed plOperty (address or general location)
-::.Ee- p.~~ ~~~
2 That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a (descnbe request)
B?o\ 71iliL€:.- ~1L.--"1':::;!.l\?Pl"\.71Cti J U>MTA.OLl ~
3 That the underSigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint
/l7R.I!€/TI-I..7A YAC 4i71-l2AY04C! ,~' Asra"I.47CS ~ {to/ ,f:#fJTc'~?/?lrr.
My CommiSSion Expires
CHRISTINE BOSS
NOTARY PUBLIC WAYNE - MI
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES AUG 17,2006
as (hIS/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to af/eU such pdlltlon,
4 That this aflidavlt has been executed to Induce the City of Clearwater, Flonda to consider and act on the above descnbed prope
5 That site VISits to the property are necessary by City representatives In order to process tillS application and the owner auth
representatives to VISit and photograph the property described In thiS application
6 That (I/we), the underSigned authonly, hereby certify that the foregOing IS true and correct
~
V 0'1-J~
COUNTY OF prNt:t'LtXS
~ 'c 1\\10,\..\1'-)
Before me the underSigned, an of/lcer duly commisSioned by the laws of the State of P1e'rida, on thiS
~ <.,,') .e.\'",~'>DL<- 2_Gc,',\ personally appeared ""'6 Q...E CC)
Deposes and says thaI heJshe fully understands the contents of the affidaVit that he she signed
(1"
'-- /
~ IPlanmng DeparlmsnllApphcallon Formsldevelopmem revlew\2003 FORMSlsmgle family resldemlal mllll application 2 3 doc
I 0 ~(C[E~~~ IrD~~
OCT I I J 1i
8 2004 ~
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES
CITY OF CLEr\RWATER
Rug: 16 04 04: lOp
r- ~
ORIGINAL
~8/11/04 02 JB FAX
0002
CERTIFICATE OF ll,ESOLUTiON
OF MA...1\lAG!:R OF
WfiSNE DEVELOPllliENT, JLLC
t. ihe 1l11derstgned, hereby certify !hallam th{ sole Mll.D.Ii8er of W lSIlC Development, LLC,
a Flondelumted hal)1bty companytthe "COiDpomy") 8 ,dtbattbe follOWIng IS a true and Conect CODY
of a resolutJon adopted by the $Ok: Man.ag~r of the Company as of August 11, 2G{l4
''WHEREA S, It 15 111 the best lIllerest of the Company thar checkIng and/or savmgs aCCOUllts
oe esublIshed wIth Ban.I.: of Amenca. N A.. ("Bank") in the name of the Company and ih3t
general bankmg busmess be authonzcd on bc.UD.Ifofthe Compomy,
"NOW THEREFORE
//
/
"BE IT RESOLVED \halt the Compan~ II be and IS h6cby authomed to establish
checkmg andlOl' saVings acc.ounts Wllh }he air a ct general baoIQng busmess WI th
the Bank ;md through such aceouni8,nd / / , k'i
"BE IT FURTHER RESOL VED John Brec ~reSlCr~..t o{the Company,
whose Signature LS as fo!lows~ i ,. be and k !s he.-eby
autbonzed. etDpower~d lmd dJr~cted ) the e and on b,ebalf of the COlllpany to
mal(e, enter mto, cltCcllie and d~]I'y r ~th to Bank any documents necessary 10
eSI<lbhshand maimam any cl1e~gaIl;d/or Sl!\' Ing;;'accounts wuh Bank, and to mlili:c
deposll.s to and withdraw21s frob sU)f 8CCOun tslon behalf of Comp=y "
J do f<lrther certify that ~ a~~f thr;/i'anager of (he Compan~1 was 1July taken 10
acr:oidanec Wlth the Operab.ng Agreement of !he }?Om]JWlY {bar then: IS no proVISion In the AI1lcles
ofOrganizanon or Operaung Agre.ement ofth~omp<llY lumhng the power of the Manage.rto pass
[11 e foregOing resolui.1on and \Jut th~ same ,(m oorno TI.lty WIth the pro\' lSlOns of S:lld ArtIcles of
Organu:auon and Operatmg Agr~/
IN WITt\r:ESS WHEREOF, 1 have hereunto ~lIb~cnbed my name as sole Manager of [he
Company, purswmt 10 due and lawful authority, as of August II, 2004
~~~
iJan L Wlsne, Sole Manager
o ~(C~~~~ '0-"
II l,lll
OCT 8 2004 L.::::/
I
I
PLANNING & DEVElOPMEN1
SERVICES
CITY OF CLEARWATER
I d
60IS-Sg.p.-tE2
i;)U$lM -1 Ul.'!'ltl
en.l! toO 21 Znu
v "J/ 1 UJ" ~ U 0" l..... ) ~ t4l\..\ t t. f '1 t:. J 44: J
bunDelt lltJe \gCnCy
Iii 0021 00 ~
Made t1'115 15th day of July, 2004 by
HANS JOACHIM PERLEBERG AND BETTINA
PERLEBERG, HUSBAND AND WIFE
ORIG'NAL
~ '9",
This Warranty Deed
3408 BEACON STREET
POMPANO BEACH, FL 33602
hereinafter called the grantor, to
WISNE DEVELOPMENT, LLC
whose post office address IS
OCT
8 2004
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
S ER viCES
hereinafter called the grantee I CITY or CLEr\RWA TER
(Whenever used nerem the term "grantor' and 'grantee" onclude all theWrtles to-tillS Instrument ano'theReifS;"""legal representallves and
assigns of InOlvl(luals and the stJccessors and assIgns of corporatlona)
Wltnosseth, that t he grantor for and In consideration of the sum 01 $10 00 and other va luable consideratIOns, receipt whereof r.3 hereby
acKnowledged hereby grants, ba19lllnS, sells aliens, remises releases conveys and confirms unto lhe grantee all t~1 certain land situate In
PINELLAS County Flonda, VIZ
Parcel 1
Begin on the West line of Osceola Avenue at the Southeast comer of Lot 14, Palm Bluff SUbdiVISiOn, according to the Map
or Plat thereof, as recorded In Plat Book 5, Page 14, of the PubliC Records of Pmellas County, Florida, then go N15022'41"
E a distance of 9773' thence NBO"04'57"W a dtstance of 373 35', thence S07"44'33"W a distance of 105 53' Thence
881 "23'01" E a dls lance of 356 09' to the POint of Beginning Together With any a nd all riparian and littoral rights the reunto
appertaining
Parcel 2
Commence on the West line of Osceola Avenue at the Southeast corner of lot 14, palm Bluff SlJbdlVlSion, according to
I
the Map or Plat thereof, as recorded In Plat Book 5, age 14 of the Public Records of Plnellas County, Flonda, then go
N15"22'41 "E a distance of 97 73' to a pOint of beginning, thence continue N 15"22'41 'E a IlIstance of 119 87' Thenr;e
N79"00'OQ"Wa distance of 149 94' thence S15"23'09"W a distance of 44 7b' thence N79"10'52"W a distance of 1)932
" Thence S17"24'09"W a diStance 018079' thence go S80"04'57"E a dlstanc.e of 32672 to the POInt of Beglnlllng, together
With any and all rlpanan and littoral nghts thereunto appertaining
Parcel 3
Beglnnmg at the Southwest comer of Lot 10 of PALM BLUFF, aecorcllng to the platthereol recorded lI'1 Plat Book 5, Page
14, PlneUas County Records, same being at average high water line Clearwater Bay, thence Westerly 705 feet on and
along the prOjected South line of said Lol1 0, thence In a NOrtherly course to a pOint opposite to and parallel With the
prOjected North line of the South 38 3 feet of lot 11 of said subdiVISiOn, thence Easterly 705 feet to the Northwest corner
of said 383 feet of lot 11, same being at the average high water line of Clearwaler Bay, thence In a Southerly course
along average hIgh water Ime to a POint of Beginning, all lYing and be1l1g In Section 9, TownShtp 29 South Range 15 East,
County of Plnellas, State of Florraa
Parcel 4
I-rom the Southeast of Govern,ment Lo12, Section 9, Township 29 South, Range 15 East run North 830 4 feet along the
East II ne of said SectIOn 9 thence North 79 degrees 00' West 1323 96 feel to POint of Begll1n I n9, same bell1g at
Northwest corner of lot 17, PALM BLUFF SUBDIVISION and average high water line of Clearwater Bay, thence North 79
deg rees 00' West 1612 7 feet to East stele of channel, thence South 21 degrees 13 Easl 184 2 feel tllence South 80
deg rees 07' East, 1503 9 feet to the Southwest co mer of property formerly owned by A A. LINCOLN AN D WilLIAM P
RICHARDS, same bemg at average high water line, Clearwater Bay, thence North 15 degrees 54' East 127 feet to POint of
Beginning, all lYing and being In Section 9, Township 29 South, Range 15 East, Pinel/as County, Florida
less that part thereof conveyed by Warranty Deed recorded m Deed Book 1385, page 195, Public Records of Pmellas
County, Florida
SUbject to covena rlts, restrIctions, easements of record end taxes for the current yea r
Parcelldonllfic8tJon Number 09/29/15/65448/Ooo/0100,09/29/15/a&w8/000/0130
Together With all the tenements hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or rn anYWise lloperl811lll1g
To Hav" and to Hold, the same 10 fee Simple forf-ver
And the grantor hereby covenanls 'Mlh said grante\:: that loe grantor IS lawfully aelZad of said land In ree Simple, thaI the grantor has good
nght and lawful aulhonty to sell and convey said land thel the grantor hereby fully warrents too hlle to said land and w.11 defend Ihe same
dgalnsf the lawful claims of all perso<1s wl1omsoever, aM that said land IS free or all encumbrances except taxes accrumg subsequent to
Oacember 31, 2003 I
In Witness Whllnlof lhe said grantor has Signed and sealed these presents the day and year ~rst above W<1t1en
\JUIHH::~ V 1 I l..-J. 't::: '"\~t HI....,.':.
I4J 00 )/005
ORIGINAL
==:J
ltness (Signature)
HANS
Province of
Country of
J he foregOing rnstNmenl was acknowledged before me this _ day of Ju Iy, 2004, by HANS JOACH 1M PE RLEBERG AN D BETTI N A
PERLEBERG, HUSBAND AND WIFE, who IS personally knOWl1 to me or Who has producM as Identification
NOTARY PUBUC (si9natu~)
Prfnt Name
My CommISsion Expires
Stamp/Seat
Prepallllf by and Returned to
Jacqueline II ~nJ8tadter
Sunbelt Title Agency
406 S AUfOr'3 Ave
Clearwater, FL 33166
File Number 7860403&6
r 0 ~(G~~~~ ~D- '/
OCT 8 2U04 L::::/ I
)
PLANNING & DEVElOPMENl
SERVICES
CITY OF ClEr\RWA TEP
1J..;;ltlU....LVV~t l.q J) 11\..:.\ tt.( lIt: jq.qj
~unbelt ritle ~gpncy
@OO4l005
/
ORIGINAL
Urkundenrolle Nr. 103 fUr das Jabr 2004
Die var ffilr gelelsteten Unterschnften
1) des Herm Hans-JoachtUl Perleberg, geb am 02 05 1948,
wohnhaft Bahrenbergnng 19,45259 Essen,
- ausgewlesen durch Vorlage semes gulhgen Relsepas~es Nr 5041477314-
2) der Frau Bettma Perleberg, geb am 10 02 1958,
wolmhaft Bahrenbergnng 19,45259 Essen,
- ausgewlesen durch Vorlage 1hres gulttgen Relsepdsse~ Nr 5041508155-
3) der Zeugm Petra Hoffmann, geb am 24 12 1966,
dlensransasslg Am Handelsbof 1, 45127 Essen,
- dem Notar van Person bekannt-
4) der Zeugm Marclke Schroder, geb am 1207 1984,
dlenstansasslg Am Handelshof 1, 45127 Essen,
- clem Notar van Person bckannt-
beglaublge leh hlermJt
DIe Betelhgten elklartcn 1m Hmblick auf g 3 Abs I Satz I Nr 7 BeurkG var Bcglau-
blgung und auf Befragen des bcglaublgenden Notars, daB wcdcr der beglaublgende
Notar noch Personcn, mlt dcnen 51Ch dlcser zur gememsamcn Berubdusubung
verbunden hat, au13erhalb lhrer Amtstahgkclt mlt dlcser Angelegenhclt befafH waren
oder ')md
Essen, den 13 Juh 2'004
N~MtS:
--~-
~'[.-l )~~~~\Il~
, I .I I
i lFil OCT 8 2004
\
I
PLANNING & OEVELOPMEN1
S ER\lICES
CITY OF CLEAKWATER
0'1
\
~~ ~~- ~-- ~...--_........._~_-.. --..... ~--
-=
ORIGINAL
" W J 00-10..1 ~J H"ld J "}ll J ;
I ~~
~ \f~>.BL\f~
3AV ~ gozl
~ \\lHOV_____ Iii;; Hal. ~ _I
I I
I (I
I] HI
'1'1 tlll;lll !II
tHllilllmli;iJtlll
I
I
tIl
~
~
~
p
~
~:~ .
II "
\!' 'I
~' -
~ .
,II. fll.li!.bU..""u
k 'I J I j I
lI!tltl~il"I!,\MlbfJ
fUlill, I . t.ltwllll
.mf~~~~nlit<...I~~lm
I jhuw[!lli1
~ !~I~I!l~ ,l:f
~ .....o.Q!-o~l!l"~.
~
J ,I jt"
lli~r.' I 1,'1
dl!illlllhll:rl~HH
;>lll~;l~l";,~.,;;'l
I
J
r.af'F:lo~j~
1/ ~
- "
,f
51 ~,
.; ..~
:0
~g
~
!
...... I.....t~
! ~~~'ro~,"
-
Ii'
tg
-,
,'1
,-
, J
.'
,
\
'- OO/SOO [i]
~,;:)U;::l.a" B11(1 11:rifIIJrl<...
~ ~ [~~~h.J [r:i~:..~t~[l-Wd ~
~ Itl.i .Jll~ ,HilL ~
"""I jI"",.>>v"S' P"UJ ~ "",. ,
~
~
,,:;
l[~~"
j,l,
!ili
, <'
.'!c'
h
iS~~
~!it
, '~
:~ j
'11)
Jl ~ ~
I ".
"I 1 -~
;(1
I
l!
-I
'F II
!~ II
I" ,
~ '"
[I I,
m ~
!~ 1&
~I !~
"
;iih!
J~,; i
JIII~i'
!i1t::'~I!
jl'~I'!
)~::f~1!I1ii!
11' ;~; II
9' -::j~l!;
; ;'!'! ~
'Hili'
'I!' .s'
!,,!~it ~
i'.l;~l ij
~'i~''''1
~ ' ~.!"~
~ i",~'ii i
ilij~
, l.gSj
h~~~~t '
. h"r!
;;i',d!,;
~. ,,~~"j
~:l~:J\
~~ (!'j'~jk:
...~:t.1~[;I:3'~
1""i,1
i t~~~1! ~
, h..lilt .
!Ii~~~~, i I
1> ~~~.,; I !
f~ ..tili;;;I~1!:
.ii~!~11 ~ '
~ n:J~,~~ !
~ h'D~;'H !
r 0 ~~~[~~
OCT 8 2004
-
~ i:;
PLANNING & OEVELOPMEN1
SERviCES ,n I
CITY OF CLer'\-=::~__
(",......i "'l'1 J J.., r ............. I ;!, -. .. r...., ~ ..
--~,
ORIGINAL
ATTACHMENT A
DESCRIPTION OF REQUESTS
o ReductiOn m ~etbacks anclmcrease In buIldmg heIght are a<, 101l0'.\''O
Flexible Standard Develooment Criteria
Proposed Setbacks ReqUIred Proposed B1dg ReqUIred B1dg
Setbacks Ht Ht.
LOT # I 20 00 FT (WEST) 15-?5 F I FRONT 443FT (I) 301'1 MAX
1500 FT (EAST) 15~25 FT FRONT
5 00 FT (N/S) 5 FT SlOE
LOI #2 1400 FT (WEST) 15-25 FT FRONT 403 Fl (2) 30 FT MAX
15 00 FT (EAS I ) 15-25 F1 FRONT
5 00 FT (N/S) 5 FT 8mE
LOT #3 30 14 FT (SOU fH) 15-25 FT FRONT 4 I 0 F I (1) 30 FT MAX
S 25 FT (EAST) 15-25 FT FRONT
5 00 FT (N/S) 5 FT SIDE
LOT #4 500 FT (SOUTH) I S~25 FT FRONT 430FT (I) 30 FT MAX
5 00 F1 (I?!W) 5 1" f SIDE
1 00 FT (NOR [ H) 15-25 F'I FRONT
LOl #5 484 FT (NORTH) 15-25 FT FRONT 3101"'1 (2) 30 FI MAX
I 5 00 FT (SOUTH) 15-25 rT FRON f
7 50 FT. (WEST) 1)-25 FT FRONT
500 FT (EAST) 5 F I SIDE
LOT #6 4 66 FT (NOR'l H) 15-25 f I FRONT 310FT (2) 30 [. r MAX
7 89 FT (EAST) 15-25 F1 FRONT
l8 05 FT (SOUTH) 15-25 FT FRONT
5 00 fT (WEST) 5 FT SlDb
LOT #7 I 7 40 FT (SOUTH) 15-25 FT FRONT 260}.T (2) 30 Fr MAX
500 F1 (EAST) ') FT SIDE
1012 FT (NORfH) 5-15 1'r REAR
6033 FT (WEST) 5 FT SIDE
LOT #8 500 F1 (SOUTH) 1)-25 FT FRON r 2 I 0 F1 (2 ) 30 FT MAX
913 FT (EASI) 5-15 FT REAR
26 04 FT (WEST) 5-15 Fl REAR
1000 FT (NORTH) 5 F I SlOE
*NOTE
(I) 11[ DO HT [S FROM GRAI1F 10
FLA l' ROOF '[ OP
(2) BLDG 1-11' IS r ROM FEMA
FLOOD LINE TO ROOF 1'01'
o ~~~~W~ D-~
l OCT . 8 2004 ) I
Pt ANNING 3. OE'VElOP~;\E Nl
S [RVll'lCS
Cl-...../ C F- r I ~-
.nTEr:t
r
1
I
ORIGINAL
I I
I
I
i
The proposed development of the land will be In harmony with the scale, bulk,
coverage, denSIty and character of adjacent propertIeS In which IllS located 1 I
,
I I
The proposed sIllgle~famlly homes wIll range III SIze from approximately 21,900
r
SF to 4,090 SF wIthIn lots that exceed the 5,000 SF mlOlmum wlthm the LNIDR
1 I
zomng The character of the houses will be tImeless claSSIC art deco to create the
j I
sense of commumty WIthm The '::iurroundmg houses are larger m nature along the
I
waterfront and contam many older homes With SimIlar claSSIC architecture ,I
,
I I
The proposed development will not hmder or dl'icourage the approprzate
I I
development and use of adjacent land and bUlldmg~ or Significantly Impart; tre
value thereof I
, I
The proposed 8-umt development wIll encourage the redevelopment of the older
f I
homes wlthm the cntena set forth m the LMDR ZOnIng Thc homes will
generally be very hIgh home') wlthm a fenced and gdted commulllty The valve rf
the surroundmg propertIes should Increase III value With the redevelopment ohI-its
property , I
i
I
The proposed development wlll not adversely afJeu the health or safeI{' rr
persons reSIding or workmg m the neIghborhood of the proposed use I
,
I
I
The development mcludes 8 stogIe fmmly reSIdences that fit mto the eXlstmg u'se
I I
of the area and does not mcIude any commercIal use that may adversely affect the
health or safety of the neighborhood I
I
ATTACHMENT B
GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA RESPONSES
2
3
The proposed development IS de:}{gned to mInimiZe traffic congestlOn 1
I
I
i
The development mcludcs an Internal pnvate roadway system that services ,6 of
I
the 8 ':>mglc-family reSIdences The mtemal roadway minimized the propps~d
access opcrungs to a total of 4 mcludlllg two pnvatc dnvcways and two roadwflY
connectiOns The northern entrance of the project extend" the current Sunset
Dnve dead end and contmucs to an mtersectlOn WIth Palm Bluff Strect
1
~ fhe proposed development 1~ conslstent With the commumty character of the
\.;J!lmmedtate VlClmty of the paral proposed for development I
4
,
The proposed slllglc-famlly development IS conslstent With the eXlstmg smg~e-
famIly reSidential neIghborhood
6
PLANNING & OEVELOP~.1ENl
SERVICES
CITY or ClE,\qWATER
ORIGINAL
,
: I
The project m1l11illlZeS the acoustic and olfactory Impacts of the project by
t I
constructIng a 6-fo01 hIgh fence along the publIc nghts of way Landscape
buffers and the fence along the property hnes ID1lllIDIZe the vIsual Impacts j The
project only contains 8 resldenhal uOlts, and wIll not mclude any busmes~es lor
commercial development I I
-0 ~~~~Vl~
OCT 8 2004
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENl
SERVICES '
ell"" OF Cu::,\8WATEr1.
--------------~ -------
"-
0/
ORIG,INAL
ATTACHMENT C
RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECT CRITERIA
G
,
The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development i IS
otherwIse ImpractIcal wzthout devwtLOns from the mtensIty and develop'mdnt
I
standards I
I
The devIatIOns requested mclude setbacks and heIght only There IS no requ6st
, I
for deViatIOns from mtensIty The project site IS very unusual for the CIty lof
Clearwater and contams severe topographIc, changes, numerous large trees: ahd
I
two abandoned houses The proposed development seeks a deViatIOn from the
I
allowable height to elevate the houses above the eXlstmg grade by the use of piers
rather than slab on grade to mmllTIIZe [ULand other Impacts.io the eXlstlt12 tri~
-bo:cf1:"~st~ The setback vanances are requested for the use of multI-sto;ry
houses wIth rrregular shapes that work around eXIstmg tree locatIOns and pro,vIQe
for an mternal private roadway system :
I
2 The development of the parcel proposed for development as a resldentwl In;Rll
project WIll not matenally reduce the fmr market value of abuttmg propertle'!'
(_r ~ 11\,e eXlslmg value of the property Wlth the two abandoned homes : IS
L ~ approXllnately $ 20 rmll10n The eIght proposed houses Will sell for III excess 'of
~ r$ll 0 nlllllon, whIch wtll sIgmficantly Increase the fair market value of abutting
nnn ::?: W I
~ 00::::1' n. ~ropertles
~ ~ ~tJ~1
= 0:> ifr Q ;Jfhe uses wlthm the re,ndentzal mfill project are otherWIse permitted m the City:of
nnJl 0'-"> I
~ <<l ffi u~learwater
r? 'YI !:-:: l'J Ul LL
~ ~ z 0 I
n n n 0 ~ ~1ihe project mcludes 8 slllgle-fan1l1y houses that are permitted wtthm the LMqR
L..L::::!....': :3 <-ahd other surroundmg zomngs :
~ 4 c. ~ uSe.! or mlX of use wlthzn the resldeotlO] znfiJl project are compatIble w:th
'-- - a~Jacenf land uses
The development mdude':i only SIngle-family reSidences WIth a rnlmmum floor
area of2,960 St, whIch are compal1ble With surroundmg houses
5 The development of the parcel proposed for development as a resldentiGl mfill
pro/eLl WIll upgrade the lmmedwte V/omty of the parcel propo~ed for
development
The proposed development of 8 smgle-fanuly hIgh-end homes will replace Q1e
two eXI'Stmg abandoned houses that are III a state of dIsrepair The IOfill pr0]eGt
Will also save a sIgmficant amount of eXl'Stmg trees that and mamtalO the wooded
chdractcr of the site and nnmedlate drea The homes Will be of higher value than
/
OR\G1NAL
I I
the eXIstmg surrounds older homes and wIll potentially mcrease the value of the
I
surroundlllg properties. I
: I
6 The deslgn of the proposed resldentwl mfill proJea creates a form and jUnctlfm
that enhances the commumty character of the lmmedlate vlumty of the p(fY~el
propo'Jedfor development and the CIty of Clearwater as a whole
I
The form of the project l~ centered on savmg the eXIstmg WOrthWhlle6.;)oFl ~e
property Great care has been taken to design the houses to create a sense Iof
tuneless archItecture whrle providIng unIque footprInts around and abov~ the
eXistIng tree root system The mternal dnveway IS free flowmg rather than hgld
to further work With the eXIstmg topography and create a sense of amva11 and
I
cornrnuruty.
7 Flexlblhty In regard to lot wldth, reqUlred setbacks, heIght and of.fstreet parkli;1g
are Jusnfied by the benefits to communzty character and the lmmedwle VlClnIty lof
the parcel proposedfor development and the CIty of Clearwater G!:, a whole
:
The requested flexIbilIty III reqUIred setbacks and heIght would allow fOF the
I
retentIOn of the eXIstmg canopy vegetatIOn on the site and lD harmony WIth the
I
ImmedIate VICInIty !
\~~~
\
\ OC1 B 2004
G & OEVElOPMENl
PLANNIN SERVICES
cn--< OF CLE.,\RWA1ER
,
FLS2004-09064
300 PALM BLUFF ST
Date Received: 09/29/2004
PALM BLUFFS
ZONING DISTRICT: LMDR
LAND USE: RU
ATLAS PAGE: 268B
PLANNER OF RECORD: KLG
CL WCoverSheel
.
If r~',~(~i~nMI~
I'i I~~LSU\JIS
I. 1 ~, I
I' <
: l ; -~ll OCT" 8 aJJ4
I, )
'"
0"
Boen's Tree Service Inc,
P.O. Box 86
Ozona, Fl.,
34660-0086
ORIGINAL
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES
ell')' OF CLEARWATER
Tree Inventory - Prepared tor \-Visne De\teloprnent LLC., for property
located at Palm Bluff Street and Osceola Avenue
Site overview and tree canopy analysis
Tbe Sl. b]ect Pi <Jpefty I::. a pp1oJ\.1l1wtel)' 1 wO Beles Sl tllatcc! on a ilattll al b1 uff and SlOpiilg to
the shorehnc of Clearwater Harbor fhe :.ltes contams native tree species tYPical of the
bI uff enVlronnlcnt that pre-exIsted development of thIS Stte l'he n~tl ve u~derstory
vegetal10n ha<; been removed by the prevIOus occupants and replaced with vanous non-
1l1"\ as(ve eAOlle plant spccles Some 01 the Slllllbs lw\ e the effect oi 11\, lIlg sculptures as
age and off~hore wmd have combmed to produce appearancc':i atYPical 01 the SpCCIC':i
ThlS ':olle also contams l1atUl3liled CXOtlC trees mal most likely havc cO!OI1lZed on thell
own Natural bluffs are rare m thc State of flonua and as such thIS property represents
both a vdluJble and ul11Que H;~SOUI Ce A SelleS of wmdmg ten dces culmll1dtmg at d. I1dtUl dl
spnng at the bd~e of the bluff sets thIs property dpart from many other properties locatcd
on the bluff In dddItlOn, as Clearwater s development started along the bluff frontIng
Clearwatel l-larbOl, thIS sIte has historIcal slgmficance
Thc prolllment <;hade tree species present Includc the live oak (Quercus virgin/ana),
pignut hIckory (Carya glabra) and the s\Neetbay magnol1a (Magnolia vlrgmwna) The
live oak tree IS common sittIng atop the blut1s llngll1g Clearwater HarbOl dnd It.':.
sweepll1g .':.erpentll1e bI anches create the effect most IdentIfiable \Nlth the bluffs There ill e
JOlll notable bve oak tlccs (01 glUUpS 01' tlees) With 111gh d.:~thellc lJ.uahlle<; and '5ufficlent
health to wandnt thell prcscrvatlOn on :,Ite The pignut hIckory IS also wmmon on the
blurt and lIS aestJletK dppcal, oveJal! charactenstICs and lll':itoncal aSSOCIallOn Wllll the
bluffs nVdl the ilve oak There are three pignut hlckones tree::. eXlst1l1g on ':ilte that
eOll1tlbute to the site ambiance and should be 'pleserved 1he live oaL and h1C1..01)' hees
arc among the toughest trees relatIve to SurVIVll1g con':itructlon Impdcts and should
survive If proper tree preservatIOn techmque':> are Implemented dunng comtruetlOn The
swcetbay magnoha IS common on the lower slopes of thc bluff where seepage crcates a
mOist CllHlonment ancl111sh tiOplcal GOndltlOns Olle sweelbd) -Mtll dJ amatlc fOllll e\.I::.ts
on thls property but IS recommended for removal Il1 the lI1ventory dS It lS Judged to be
hazardous due to the presence or an enormous basal cav1t)'
In addltlon to the dbove Jefelenced shade tle:e,:> the slte pus::.e::.:.e::. many fine: palm tIees
and shmb/accent tree :.pecles The natIve ':iabal palm (Sabal palmetto) IS scattered
throughout the SlIe and several unusually tall speCImens are recommended f(H
preservatIOn and noted on the l11ventory The sIte IS laden wtth accent tree, shlUb and
groundeovcr plants that pos':iess out':itandmg aesthetic appeal because of their age and
ORIGiNAL
appeardnce and should also be consIdered 101 preservation EXOllC trees ~uch as the
bJazIhan pepper tIee (Schmus terebmthlfoLulI) dnd camphOl tree (Cmnmnomum
((III/pliol (j) dl L do wngl aded clnd I ceo ml11t,ndeu 1\:1l 1 cillO val, as the S tate ~ bx I) t](, Pc '>l
Pldnt Council lists them a~ category #1 ecologIcal pest~ The native cherry laurel tree
(h Linus CaI Ollrllana) IS growmg 10 abundance along ll1e SOUtJl :lnC1 eaSI propellY lmc clnC1
dlthough consIdered weedy by some plant professlOnah It IS recommended for retentIon
on thiS site Jor lt~ ~Cleel1lng plOperue::.
Tree Inventorv IJata
The tlce lllvel1tOly pIovldes a "snapshot" of the plopelt) and establishes a hleHilcl1.\' of
eXIstmg trees to a~Slst the site deSigner lD the proLe,;,; of choosmg tree') to be ll1eorporated
mto the site deSign I he 1l1ventory ll1cludes the followmg InformatiOn
I) T,-ee locd.hon - hach tJee IS h:'.leJ by a numbel thdt c011cspomb to the ~,U11e
number phYSically located on the Slte pldn mdleatmg the locatIOn of the tree tn the
field
2) Tree Mze expressed as dmmeter at bleasl height (DBH - the trunk chameter
measured at 4 5' above grdde) If there IS a fork a1 4 5', the mea')urement It taken
at the ndrrowest pomt below the fork
3) Tree ~pCCle!l me :'.hown by both "ammon and botanl"dl nall1t:~ the fiI~l tIme they
are listed In the mventory and only by common names thereafter
4) The trees overall vaiue ratmg r:mks Ule nee on ;} scale or 0-6 (hcllf mcremems are
used to mcrcase aCCUIdc,y) ba')cd on ItS overall health (condItion) Factors such dS
the :'.ILe, :'.pecle~ and appearance are al:'.o con:'.Iclered
3) The crown !lpread for all shdde tree ,>penes IS s!10\"11 dS dlst:l.11Ce dnc1 dIrectIOn
from the trunk (the crown spread rs only "hown wlthm the property Imes)
6) The comment section prOVides C01ll1Uentaly dlscussmg ~p<2(,djc ]J011l1S botll
positive and negative of the subject tree
l3elO\\ IS an cxplananon of the mung sysrem for the overall condillon 01' tlle eXIstmg
trees It should be noted that the trees eXlstlOg on till:'. SIte reflect general neglect and
:'.eveJaI of the uees will benefit flOm plOpel plUnmg and could be sLlb~equently
upgraded In addItIOn many of the trees WIll benefit from additIOnal tree care
medsures such as fertIil7atlon, cabhng and braclOg etc It IS further rccommended that
all lemedml work perfOlmed on the hees preserved at thl'; site be peIfOlmed by or
under the dIrectIon of an IntematiOndl SOCIety of Arbonculture (ISA) CertIfied
Arbonst
II [5 [E~[E~Yl[E ,
OCT - 8 aJ04 0
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES
CITY OF CLEARWATER
"
ORIGINAL
Ratmg System
o - A dead tree
1 -lree') lhOl arc Cl)mg, snelelY aecimmg, Ol haL.cllC10US ;}nd trees desIgn::llea by the
S tate of Honda's tXotK Pest Plant CouncIl as a category # I ecologlcal pest, 1 e ,
BiCl.Llhan peppel tlce A tlee with a #11at1l1g should be ltlllO\'cd Note: The camphoi
tree IS a category #1 ecological pest but provides valuable screenmg along the north
""'roperhl II nl: ",l..",r,,' ,t m""''''''d",r" (vn ...,,,..,,-1 Off Ih'" ."..,rAp'~rT" The d(,,,f'IA...."'r h...,s ,,,rl,, -;,1",,-1
p ...~t i 1111"'L...... i '" ~..l"'Y.l.l ........I...J Vl.l .....1.1."--+ .L..i................ ~.L.V '-' r l...~ ........ 1 .......iVp........... ....LIA Ll.L......~J."'-'l..-l-l......U
d de5lre to preserve the camphor tree,', so they have been rated m regmd,', to then
Ileal th dnd stJ uctUJ e and not thell 111 va',lve chal aclell <,t1(,')
:.: - flees eX1Ubllll1g senous 5tructural aefects 5Llch as CO-QOl1lll1am Stems \Vlln
lIleluded bark large caVItIes, crown chebdck, cracked/spilt branches etc Trees wtth
hedlth L"sues such d~ low enelg:y, low bve ClOwn lelllU, S':tJOll,', dI,',edse 01 ll1~ed
problems, nutntlOnal deficlenCle'l or pH related problems A tree With c1 #2 ratmg
should be removed unless the problem,> will be mItigated
3 - Trees that have good overall structure and 5ystemtc health With problems that can
be corrected With moderate mamtenance A tree WIth a #3 ratmg has an averagc
appearance, crown density and bve crown ra110 A tree wllh a #3 ratmg should be
pl eserved If possIble
4 - II e.:::, WI th good structlll e and ~ y ~ term cheal tl1 WIt h plO b I ems that Ldl1 eaSl J y be
corrected With mll10r mall1tenance Trees should exhIbit good foml WIth above
avclagc crown dcnsny Mature trees exhlDltlng scars ow \\OundS, small cavll1es or
other problems that are not debIhtatmg can be mcluded III th1s group parttcularly If
they possess Ll11JqUC f01111 01 othel ac<;thetic amenitIes lclatu1g to then age TIees wilh
a #4 ratll1g should be preserved and warrant sIte plan modrficatlon for preservatlOIl
,,_ Trf'''''' Bldh hloh 1,\,,,, erO"'I} raho "''''eent'onal Sl['" IL,r'" <'nd s),,,t"'m'c h{,,,lth OAA,-1
..J ~ ............;, )) ~W.l J.~ e~..L..l.i "'-'" ....y L..J. ~ .....:... I'" 1. J. !..- loA........... I..L_ rL-Ll..i. )............. 1.1 ~l..........~ll!j... b.....'v-.".J.
form and free from any senous dlsease, ll1sect problem or l1utntlOnal defiCIency A
tlee 111 tl11', categoJ y should ha\< e a bithmccd Clown \lylth c'\..ceptlolial aestheuc
quahttes Trees With a #5 ratmg lend conSIderable value to the SIte and 5hould be
lllcorpordtcd mto the SHe deSIgn Trees \VHI} a P.:J raung are \Vonny of slgmfieam Slle
plan modlficatlOns to ensure theIr preservahon
6- Specnnen ttee - A "peClmcn tIee IS a tlee that posses:::,\:,:::, a combmJ.twl1 of supenOI
quahhes relatmg to SIze, speCIe, form, umqueness, structure, systemic health and
crown denSIty A speCImen tree must be preserved and mcorporated mto d slIe deSIgn
With an undIsturbed area equal to the bee's dllplll1e (blanch spread 35 projected
vertically to thc ground)
10 ~~~~~M~ 0'
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
Sc:RvlCES
CI ry Or- CLE"RWATER
,r
OR\G\NAL
rl~o~- ~(C[E~\w[E
II
!I OCT - B 2004
Tree inventory
F'Ll\NNING & DEVELOPMENT
SERviCES
CI:Y OF Cl[)i~WATER
Tree# Size
Specie
Rating
crown spread
1-
10" DBH Pmdo Palm (BU1W cap/lata)
20
N/A
COl11.men!::' 1 blS t1 ec has 10 w aestht:tl-: valtle dlle to cl slllJll d 0\\111 and 1 es1l1cted .ell eas
on thc trunk The palm also has m1110l nutntlOnal dcficlCnCles,
/ -
n nBH <;: db" 1 P"lT'Yl (C',r, h,r,1 n/, '"",of' ,,)
I J.......... ..} ....tl ~ ~ILjl _IUjjW I~U""Jlr;.:.. 11.-"'-1
35
N/,8..
C0111l11ents ThlS tlee 1S located 011 the Palm 3h~ff ugh! of way and IS h<2althy Wltl, the
exceptlOn of mmor wounds on the trunk
3-
15" DBH Sabal Palm
3.0
N/A
Comments ThIs tree 1<; located on the Palm Bluff nght of way and IS an average tree
wlth small trunk wounds at the base
4-
24",21" DBB Sweetbay (Magnolia VI! gmlana) 3.0
20'N, 20'S, IS'E, 22'W
Comments ThIS bee l~ co-dommant at the ba~e that can lead to structural faIlurc, tt
has a small basal cavlty and ffimor decay on the central leader It has a ptcturesquc
form With average crown denSIty Preserve If posSIble and cOll';Ider cabl1l1g and
bracl11g for the co-domll1ant
5- 13" DBH Sabal Palm
30
N/A
Commems ThIS palm has an average cro\\n with vmes on the IlunK Adjacent oak
(U1d ~weetbay are causmg over~tory restnctiOns for growmg space
6 - 13' DBH Chll1esc Fan Palm (Lzvz~lOna Ch1l1en~lS) 4.0
N/A
Comments ThIS tree has a very dttractlve ::L.'1d healthy crown Remove vmes There 1$
some overstary competitiOn from adjacent sweetbdY tree
7- 15" DBH Sabal Palm
2.0
N/A
Commel1ls Tlll~ uee's crown IS rubbmg agam~t the scaffold branches of U1e adjacent
sweetbay tree Recommend removal of thIS palm
110 lS~~~WlS
OCT - 8 2004
o I ORIGINAL
8- 13-' 0 BH Sabal Palm PLANNING & CEVELOPM E Nl 2.5, NI A
I SER',/ICES
Comments 'I hi,) tree ha~ d s_tJa!li:lli'rJ1g"o\t1;..h~tirunJ(lthat wllJ eventudlly kdlthe pdlm
If the fig IS lemoved the palm wlil be upgraded to a 3 0 Thele 15 some ovedledd
co III petl t I on fro rn an ad J acen t oak tl ee
9- 36" LIve Oak (Quercus vlrgmlOna)
5.0 23'N, 20'S, 30'S, 28'W
Comments this tiee hd'i a <;mall bd~dl I..dVIl)' on tht: we~l ~IJe <lnd the suulhem most
scaffold branch IS 30% decaycd Ho\vever, thl~ branch has been prevIously cabled
Tne cable sl10uid be re-m5tallecl pel cUlrent is,'-\. :::.tandalds i he I'oII:16(; l1as good SIze
ancl color and the tree has average crown clem,lty ThIS tree ha,:> clramatlc aesthebc
appeR) due to the IJ11usual selpentllle (even f01 a II\!': oal..) Llanue of the blanch
structure ThIS tree IS enhanced by the pre5ence of a natural spnng and the effect of
the branch dIppIng Into the Spr111g J.J1d emerging Jg::nn IS prIceless FTh15 tree should be.
preserved at all LOst:::. and would benefit from "orne cablIng and proper prumng
10- 27 DBI-I Sv,,'eetbay
3.5
15'N, 18 S, J2'E, 16 W
Comment') rhIs tree has ITImOI decay en the base Inc co-domm811t 111 the lowel
trunk has a Wide-angle crotch WIth a branch bark ndge eXlstmg through the crotch
The crown IS healthy
11- 5",5" DBH LIgustrum (Llguslrumjaponlcum)
,.., -
.) )
N/A
Comments ThlS tree ha<; hIgh aesthetlc appeal and wli! Improve once adjacent
oleander IS removed
] 2- 36" DBH Sweet bay
1.0
14'N, 12'S, 10'E, 15'W
L 0111 111 enb I ]l1S nt:t: has d beaubful Lluwn With Vel)' high ae':>thetl<.., dppeal
However, thiS trec has a 16" Wide cavity at the bast, on the edst Side and the trunk 15
80% hollow Thl,) tree IS haLardous and should be removed
t3- 36 PJgnul I-ltckory l Caryu glubl a)
4.0 22'1'<,30 S, 21 S, \2 \\1
Comment') ThIS tree has good "tructure however It has minor dIe back 111 the upper
crown, mmor basal decay on the east SIde probably due to a tree thdt once grew there
and a metal pipe cmbedded m the 11 LInk
14- 38" DBH Live Oak
3.0 32'N, 32'S, 21 'E, 20'W
Comments IhIS tlec ha,:> an unJeH.lcvdoped crown WIth some decay, deadwood and
stubs m the upper portIOn There IS a 5ma11 caVIty on the south SIde With concretc
filler but thiS WIll not compromIse thc tree Needs to be pruned
ORIGINAL
15- 13' DBH Sdbal Palm
3.5
N/A
Comments rhl::> palm I~ groWIl1g from ba::>e of adJacent Live Oak but IS still
GOl11patlblc -[ hClc wlil bc ovelstOlY competition 1I1 the futUle [10m oak to the west,
tree # 16
16- 50" DBH Live Oak
2.5 18'N, 38'S, 48'1:" 10 W
Comments This hee has a health) SystemiC system although 1t has a (,a\ 1t) on the
east side (side of the lean) measunng ., l"S' wide at base and tapers to a pOll1t 7' above
the grade -! he core of heartwood IS present dnd hdld however the lean OP thl::> tree
has slgl1lficantly reduced the physical support The Jonner central leader broke off
lea" mg B hu ge wound llll:> tl ce has lugh aesthehc appeal, ho WeVel PL eseL v 111g this
tree creates a fisk due to the trunk decay [f the tlee IS preserved, proposed houses
<;hould be located out ot the target range area should thl<' tree Ll.II
17- 12" DBH Sabal Palm
2.5
N/A
Comments This Pdlm ha5 overhead competItIOn Will bc rated a 3 If #6 IS removed
18- 13 DBH Saba] Palm
2.5
N/A
Comments This tree has overhead competition Wlil be a 3 If#16 IS removed
19- 8" DBH Queen Palm (Syagru.s romanzoffiana) 3.0 NI A
Comments ThIs palm has competition trom #6, which wdllmpact 111 future
20- 5 DBI-j ScheHlera (&hefflel a aclll1ophylta)
20
N/A
Comment5 ThIs tlee IS a cold sensItIve \',feak wooded pbnt "vlth 3n extensIve root
system However It has ae::>thetlc appeal and IS healthy and can be preserved If
dCSll cd
21- 12' DBH Sabdl Palm
3.5
NIt>..
Comments Healthy young palm
22- 9" DBJ-I Queen Palm
40
N/A
Comments Good palm
23- Scheff1era
2.0
N/A
OCT - 8 2004
[
Comments see comments for tree #20
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES
CITY OF CLEARWATER
24- Schefflera
2.0
N/A
ORIGINAL
T6)[E~[E~\4~ C'
lfl1 OCT- 8 2004 .
Comments see comments 1'01 tl ee #2U
25- 13" DBH Saba! P:llm
'111
.., v
N /,L\.
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
Comments TillS tIee 15 Plctulcsque WIth Its ClOWn sllhouctted agall1SIL the Sky en~ ~~~~~\~~ATER
bay as a backdrop
26- 36' DBB Pignut Hickory
40
27'N, 27 S, 33'E. 20'W
COI11I11~nts 11m, tI~e has velY good ::,tlUctUle and 1~ pelched atop the bluff 1 he hee
has lost 3 large laterdl branGhe5 that will rcsult m decay. however It \ViiI not
slgl1lfieantly debliltdte the structural lI1tcgnty Thl'3 tlee should be preserved
'" ** * '" The trunks ot ~everal of the followmg trees appear to be on the ad Jac,ent
property Just north of the north property Ime They wIll be noted a'3 AP (adJdcent
property) 111 the comments section They are requIred to be mventoned by the City dS
their root sy<;tem extends lI1to the subJect plopcI1y dnd may be Impacted by the
plOpo5ed dcvelopment even though they may be off the ph)pelty 11l1e they offel
bcncfi ts '3UC h as <;creel1l ng '" * '" * * * '
27- 13" DBH Sabal Palm
3.0
N/A
Comments AP- ThiS liee ha<; a lestllcted trunk at bud
28- 7".8 '8 DBH Plttosporum (P:tto5porum tobna) 3.0 N/A
Conmlents AP- ThIS llee has some dlcbad.. and a tl1llll111lg ClOwn but has an
II1terestll1g form and provIdes ')crccmng
29- 13" DBJ-I Sabal Palm
4.0
N/A
Comments I hiS tl c(; 1') a tall palm with an lI1terest1l1g clOok 111 tI unk Rel..ommendeJ
for pleservatlOn
30- Senegal Date Palm cluster (Phoemx rechnata) 3.5
N/A
Comments AP- With care thiS palm cluster could provIde screel1lng and a stnkll1g
aesthetic amcl1lty
3] - ] 3" OBI-! Pmdo Palm
3.0
N/A
Comments ThiS tree IS an average palm but provides some ')creemng
32- 15" DRH Sabal Palm
4.0
N/A
r
ORIGINAL
Comments AP- Nice palm
33- ! 4" DBH S3baJ Palm
4.0
l'JI A
Comment:, AP- NIce palm
34- 13" DBH Sabal Palm
3.0
N/A
Comments: AP~ This palm has no clear trunk yet but has 5crcel1lng value
35- 1 r DBH Queen Palm
4.0
N/A
Comments AP- Good crown
36- 5" DBJ-I Viburnum (VIburnum odoratl)Jlmum) 3.0 N/A
Comments AP- Under-developed crown but has 5cleenmg value
37 - 36" DBH Laurel Oak (Quercus launJolla) 1.5 20'N, IS'S, 39'E, 9'W
COllll1J.,;'nts rhls tree has open cavitIes 10' np the Lmllk on tile nortlwvest Slue and
consIderable dleback 111 the crown Recommend removal
***** A.JI camphor and BrdZdld11 pepper trees arc on the State s c3te:;;ory one !Jst fOl
II1VaSIVe exotIc plants and consequently are rccommended for removal However, as
the camphOl hees plovlde all abundance of SCICCl1lng along the 1101th plopeliy lllie
and are not as notonous as the pepper tree, the developer may wIsh to feta1l1 them on
site Invasive eXOllC trees wIll be noted 1I1 the comments '5eCUon as IE (mvaslvc
exotI c) hereaftcr * * * * *
38- 17" DBH Camphor (Cmnamomum camphora)
2.5 18'S, 15'E, IS'W
Comments: IE- 11m, tree IS on thc property line and has golden pothos vmes groWll1g on
11 unk and mto the canopy
39- II" DRH Washmgton palm (Wa'ihmgtoma robu'ila) 3.5
N/A
Comments Good palm - try to preserve
40 Areca palm cluster (ChrysalI do carp us lutescens)
3.0
N/A
Comments Extends over both propertIes on the north side dnd makes a good butter
41- 26 DEB Camphor
25
15'S,2'W,5 E
ORIGINAL
COITIIl1er-:.ts IE-l"'\hlS tree has n11nor dH:b.:~ck In the upper cro\vn and the trunk 13 covered
by golden potho5 (Cplpremnum aureum) VlI1C Tree b provldll1g screenmg
42-17',16 DBI-Il\Vmcamphortrees
20
30'S, 25 \V, 20 E
Comm.ems fE- Tms tree has large aeadwood 111 the uppel Clown ll1at could oe removeCj
anc1ls co-clommant with mc\uc1ed bdrk 2 above grade Goldcn pathos vme on trunk
43- 9",9",9' , 10" DBH Camphor
2.0
25'S, O'W, 38 E
Comments I E- I hiS tree has co-domll1ant stcms wilh mmor dlebdck, a rubbmg bl anch
and golden pothos vlI1e on the hunk Plovldes sCleemng from adJacent property Could
be pre,;elved or removed
44- 11',14" DBH Camphor
2.0
IS'S 20'E
Comments IE-See comments for tree #43
45- 16', I] - DBH Camphor
2.0
20'E
Comments. IE-See conunents fCH Uee ~43
46- 17 DBH Camphor
..,n
_.v
22'S, 25'E, ! 5 W
Commcnts IE-See comments tal trcc #43
50- 12' DBH Queen Palm
3.0 N/A fg
'II r-
z
W 0:
[1illJ ~ w
2.5 N/A C3 0- ~
0
~ ~ ....JU)~
l}-lwO:
..->oJ
== CX) w_
0JhJ} 1 O>....J
c<:lIIU
lU LL
2.5 N/A g t; (!)(f)o
a ~ ~
11JlJl z u
5
~ 0-
3.5 N/A I: __J
lo..... ~ ____-.A
47- 8" DBH Queen Palm
Comments Average palm, has pits on trunk
48- 10" DBB Queen Palm
Comment') Below average palm
49- 8" DBH Queen Pdlm
Comments Below average palm
Comments Good palm
51 - S" OBB Queen Palm
'1':::
...I..J
N/A
Comment5 Palms #51, #52, #53 ure good palm5 and woulcl make an aUlactJve stand
o lc \~ b ~ W LS I r " ,
OCT - 8:rot lhV1
(I PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
52- 8' DBH QJen Palm SERVICES 3.5
\ CITY OF CLEARWATER
Comments See comments for tree #51
ORIGINAL
N/A
53- 9' DBH Queen Pdlm 3.5
N/A
Comment:) See comments for tree #51
54- 22" OBI-! Camphor
1 0
lO'N, 21'S, 18 E,20'W
Comments lE- Thls tree has a caVity at the bdse and should be removed
55- 13' DBH Sabal Palm
4.0
N/A
Comment:> Good palm
56- 11' DBH Queen Palm
') -
_.:'l
1\J!/\
Comment:> ThIS palm has a restncted lrunk and overstory compeutlon
57- IS" DBH Laurel Oak
2.5
ITN, 20'S, 14'W, 16'E
Comment:> ThiS tree has a poorly developed crown and IS attached at lOot flare to tree
#58 Recommend removal
58- 13" DBH Laurel Oak
2.5
18'N, IS'S, lO'E, 16'W
Comments ThiS tree has a poorly developed crown and IS dttac.hed at root flare to tree
#57 Recommend removal
59- 2- Sabal Palms
N/A
N/A
COl11menb One palm has If of dem trunk and the othel l' 01 cleJI tllmk 1 he)' me not
protected by ordll1ance so they Cdn be transplanted, protected or removed
60- 12' DBH I-long Kong Orchid (/3auhlnla btakeana) 2.5
IS'N, 12'S, 10 W, IS'E
CommenLs Cold ')ensltlve exotlc that nower:':> Could be pleserved 101 ae:>thetlc appeal
61- 30" DBH Live Oak
3.5
40'N 24'S, 20'S, 30'W
Comments ThIS tlee has a yOllng splcadlllg ClOwn wIth good stl\1ctUle that w1l1 evolve
Into an appealtng tfec Needs remedial prunmg
62- 6' DBH Hong Kong Orchid
1.5
N/A
,
ORIGINAL
Comments This tree has an underdeveloped Clown with pOOl "nuclure and IS undel tlee
#61 Recommend removal
65- 10" DBH Queen Palm
2.5
N/A
I'll ,....
z
UJ cr
0J1:D ~ UJ
g Q I-
~ 0 <
~ ....JU):<:
~wfr
= co w<:2~
0J1:D I 0>---1
<(la:o
g b t'lt:::u..
z 0
0 z ~
[1Rfl z 0
rO-V-~ :S
0..
rcQ
63~ 6" DBH Hong Kong Orchid
1 5
N/A
Comments See comments tar trec #62
64- 1]" DBI-J Quecn Palm
2.5
N/A
Comments '[ his palm IS wmpetmg with more valuable tree #6] Could remove
Comment:, Thl:, pdlm hdS numelOus pllS on tJ unk but h.l5 a mce crOWll
66~ 1 n ' DUH Q''''.AI' p;.ln'
v .L..I' u......'--" 1 .......... l
") ;;.
_...,
N/A
Comments I IllS palm has seal" on the trunk anu IS competmg .Wlth mOle valuable: oak
Recommend removal
67- 5 ' 081-1 Camphor
1.0
N/A
Comments IE-This tree has poor structure Recommend lemovaI
68- 6" DBB Camphor
1.0
N/A
Comments IE~ Tree has poor structure, ] ecommend removal
69- 11" DBI-I Quccn Palm
2.0
N/A
Comments This palm has decay and restnctJon In the trunk but has a I1ICC crown
70- 12" DBH Queen Palm
2.0
N/A
Comments rillS palm has decay and pitS on II unk and (,Quid be lemO\ ed
7] - ] 2' DBH Queen Palm
3.0
Nli\
Comments rhlS palm has mlllor pItS but a mee erO\\11
72- J.Agustrum
2.0
N/A
Comments Tlus IS a multI-stem tree that has potential If adJacent bushes are removed
73- 10" DSH Laurel Oak
2.5
10'N, IS'S, 12'E, 12'W
ORIGINAL
Comments This tree has poor structUle but provide", SLreemng from adJacent property _ ---
Keep for thIs purpose otherwIse ,ecommend for lemoval ill
I,~ """"
74- I]" DSH Sabal Pdlm 4.0 N/A j ,,- ~
[l-&[] 5:
~ ~ ~wO(f):
c_----~ _ Wi
= co ~S:2'
0>1
I "" cc I
W
t3 C)U)I
<::) Z I
Z
z
5
0..
Comments This IS a healthy palm despltc the presence of nails 111 trunk
75- 17" DBH Chmese Fan Palm
[lliJ]
g
M1J
76- 4' DBH Cherry Ldurel 2.0 N/II., ~
Comments Tlus hee h., an unJe,de,eloped eto""n ""tll 1'001 ,huet",e altd JeP ~
dorl1lnant stem Does provide sLreel1lng on property Ime Keep for thIs purpose or
4.0
N/A
Commenls AP- ThIS palm ha~ J' or cleal trunh. and 15 a healLl1)' specimen
remove
77- 10",6',5" DBB Camphor
2.0
IS'S, 8'E, lO'W
Comments IE- ThIs tlce has poor structure and has some decay at the base Recommend
removal
78- 12" DBH Sabal Palm
N/A
N/A
Comments This palm has only 3' of clear trunk but plovlde", screel11ng on the property
lme
79- 7",8" DBH Southern Red Cedar (Jumpenl\. :odlclcola) 25
lS'S, 12'W, 2"E
Comments ThIS tree has a CO-domm:l11t stem m tlle lOwer I1unk vmh mCluded bmk The
crown IS sparse With deadwood Needs remechal prunmg Provides sereenmg along
propelty hne
80- 12" DBE Southern Red Cedar
30
22'S, 10'W, 2 E
Comments This tlee has a sp<l\se ClOWn .let P10\ ides SCieen1l1g on plOflett) lille Needs
to be pruned
81- 7" DBH Southern Red Cedar
2.5
18'S, 10'W, 2'E
Comments see comments for tree #80
82- 11" DBH Southern Red Cedar
3.0
15'S, 10'W, S'f
Comments see comments for tree #80
ORIGINAL
83- 10" OBI-! Queen Palm
3.5
N/A
Comment':> 11115 IS d very tall palm located on the property lme that ha<, aesthetic value
84- 6" DBH Laurel Oak
1.5
10'S, 11 W,O'S
Comments ThIS tJ ee has pOOl SUllctm e ReCOfl1J11el1d 1 emo\' al unless llsed as SCI eel1il1g
on property line
85- l' DBH L~aurel Oak
1.5
10'S S'W O'E
Comments see comment') fol tl ce #84
86- 36 DI3l-1 Pignut HICkory
4.5
32'S, 30'W, 30 E
Comments I lus tlee hds good Sll udUle and neLu:::, only lTIlIlOI pI umng Shllt hou~c to
ptotect rool system Recommend preservatIOn
87- 9' DBH Cherry Laurel
1.5
15'S,6'W 10'E
Comments ThIS tree has poor structure with a co-dommant stem 5' above grade dmi IS
also growing under tree #86 Should be removed for hickory":> benefit
88- 5" OI3l-1 Laurel Oak
1.0
N/A
Comments 1 hIS tlee ha5 a vel y pOOl I..lown WI th weak sb UC1Ul e and a co-Jomll1dnt stem
Should be removed fOl Hickory's benefit
89- 20" DBH Laurel Oak
2.0
25'S, 10'E
COHlmeJits ThIS uee has a co-dol111l1ant stem at base WIth a potential fOl fmIme The
upper crown hds good strueture and spreads over the street Could be preserved If cable
~md brac.,es arc Jn5talled
90- 6" DB1-1 Laurcl Oak
1.0
15'SW
Commcnts ThiS tree has a very poor and underdeveloped crown Recommend removal
91- 9" DSH Queen Pdlm
3.0
N/A
1:--
o
~ ~
=
0d10
U
0d10
~
Comments A very tall palm 111 average conditIOn
92- 4",4" DBH Brazlildn Pepper (Schmu5 terebmthifoiIu'l) 1.0
N/A
Comments IE- Recommend remo" al
00
I
G
o
I--
Z
w
~
c..
o
....l(/)
~w
wU
0>
a::
oOw
f.9rJJ
Z
Z
z
:5
c..
ORIG\NAL
93- 28" DBH Red Gay (Penea borboma)
12'S, 12'W
1.0
Comments 5 :::,tem<, growmg trom rotted stump It 1:::' very unu5udl yet <:.hould be removed
94- 6' DBB Cherry Laurel
2.0
5N 5S,5'W
Comments ThIs tree 1S ~ro\Vmg over the nght of way Can be preserved for scrceflmg on
pro pelt y lllle
95- 5"' D81-! Red Bay
N/A
2.5
Comments ThIs tree IS growlllg over fight of way Can be preserved for screemng
96- 6" DBH Red Cedar
N/A
2.5
Comments ! hIS tree has a sparse ClOwn ProvIdes some screenmg on propcrty Ilnc
97- 18' DI3H Sabal Palm
4.0
N/A
Comments Healthy palm that needs prumng
98- 15' DBH Laurel Oak
2.5
15'N, 8'S, JO'E, 12'W
Comments Thl,) tree needs some prunll1g 10 remO\.e deadwood and stub') Could be
preserved for screemng along property Ime
99- BraLlhan Pepper stand
N/A
1.0
Comments II<> Rec.ommend removal
100- 9 , 7' 4 ,2" DI3H Red Cedar
18 N, o's, lS'W
2.5
Comments This tree IS d multI-Stem one-sldcd tree It IS crackll1g the retall1mg wall but
has screemng value
101- 10", 10" DBH Red Cedar
3.0
18'N 12'S, 22'W
Comments -I hiS tree has a burlll1 the lower trunk and needs some prumng Has ~cre~n.!!lg
value '(n
102- 10'" DBH Queen Palm 1.5 N/A
Comments ThiS palm has senous damage on the trunk Recommend removal
[1QJ]
~
~
c:::l
~
co
I
I-
c.J
C)
103- 21 ,. DBH Laurel Oak
2.5
==
13'N, 20'S, 25'W [1&[1
g
Q11J]
(Qb
- - ------- -
r-
Z
w 0:
:2 ill
a.. f-
a <t:
-lCf)~
~wr;;
w(,,;lw
0>-1
00 II 0
W
~U)u.
Z 0
Z ~
z -
:3 ()
a..
ORIGINAL
Commems This lree ha:, poor strucmre with cO-dommQl1l stems Tl1ere IS ~ome decay on
leader to the east and It also has a large branch graft There clre heavy vllles present <lod
:,[ub<, Proper prunmg can nnpro\e overclJJ LOl1chtlOn Prov,des scrcenmg on ptOpell) line
104- Brazlllan Pepper cluster
1.0
1\11 A
Commcnts U:- Recommend lemoval
105- I3razllllan pepper duster
1.0
N/A
Commcnts I E- Recommend removal
106- 4" DB H CitrUS (Citrus "'pp )
to
NIl\.
Commcnts Recommend removal
107- 7" DSH Cherry Laurel
2.5
10'N, 8'S, IO'W
Comments Provide::. :,creenmg on property Ime
108- BrazIlian pepper cluster
1.0
N/A
Comments IE- Recommend J emoval
109- 8" DBH L clurel Oak
2.0
N/,6~
COlllments Tlus tlee has an l.ll1delde\!clopc;d ClOW11 anclls 111 an oVelclowded C0J1dlt1011
Could be removed or savcd for sereenmg value
I 10- 4'" DBH Cherry laurel
1.0
N/A
Comments Recommend removal
111- 12" DBB Sabal Palm
3.0
N/A
Comments Palm has some VII1CS that should be removcd
112- 8" DBH Sabal Palm
4.0
N/A
Comments I hiS palm IS sl1 UdUl all y ~ound wl th :,c,ar:, on hunk and ~0mc vll1e~ on tht
trunk Thl:, palm should be preserved Ifposslblc
Commenb ThIS palm has 50me \llI1es that should be removed
, O*~~lE~\4lE ~D~--"',
OCT - 8 2004 I
113- ] 0" DBH Sabal Palm
3.0
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENl
SERVICES
CITY OF CLEARWATER
ORIGINAL
\\4- l3' DBl-! SJb~d Palm
l\J / A.
30
Comment::. Thl::. palm has. ~eclrs on ItS. LlUnh but I::' str LlctuJally SOund
\15- \3" DBI-T Sabdl Palm
N/A
3.5
Commcnts This palm hd':> 50me vmes 111 the caoopv that should be rcmoved
\ 16 - 9" DBH Live Oak
IO'N_ 8 S 15''''[ ( ~
'LC}j
[1[1J]
~
=
MJ]
U
Qd1J]
NfA. ~
2.5
Comments ThiS tree ha5 dn underdeveloped canopy \Nlth hcavy vines
I ] 7- 4" DBH Red Bay
N/I\
2.0
Comments Thl5 tree IS c.overed With vll1es but wIth prutllng could be saved
""=::l"
C:I
~
co
I
I---
U
o
118- BrazIlian Pepper cluster
1.0
N/A
Commcnts IE- Recommend lemo\'al
119- 32" DBH Laurel 03k
10
~
Z
LJ.J a:
::?: w
D- f-
a <
-.Jws
~w;r;
W 0 '
C>~
""cco
t5~u.
Z 0
z i::
z -
::i 0
D-
Comments ThiS tJee has 3 hollow (:a\/lty 111 the t11mb.. (jnd ,11dJOl dIcbacl.. Il1 upper CIOWll
It IS hazardous and should be removed Check with the City to determme If the tree IS on
the nght of way and If so, WIll they remove It
120- 9" DBH Washmgton Palm
N/A
3.5
Comments ThiS IS a tall graceful palm, but IS touchmg wIres Progress Energy could
place a wJap on the tam\..
121- 6' DBH Cltrlls
1.0
5'N, 5'S, 5'E, 5'W
Comments ThiS Citrus IS diseased and should be removed
122- 6" DBH Citrus
2.5
8'N, 5'S, 8'E, 8'W
Comments ThiS tree hd5 some dIeback but could be pruned, tertlhzed and preserved
123- 15" 0 BH P1l1do Palm
N/A
2,5
Comments ThiS palm IS attractive but has some decay at the base and IS gro'I,"lI1g under
utility wires that It IS about to tOUGh Should be removed
124- Cherry LaUl ell1edge
No lima neces.sary - see comment5
OR\GlNAL
fro
0Jb0
~
c:=
liJ1JJ
cg
[1l1[]
Commems Young cnelfY burel rfees form an LljmO~1 unblQken I1coge Jlong the somh
property lme Becduse they <lfe grOWll1g vel)' close together, l11dlVlduab wlthll1 the stand
have huh:: valw; Althuugh the pi unmg plOc..:dUle or luppmg b nevel lel-Ommenlkd to!
'3hdde trees, the cherry laurel IS more of an aecenl tree and lend~ It5elf to hedgmg ThiS
~tand w1l1 provIde good screel1lng amemtles along Palm Bluff <;treet If hedged
125- 12' 0 BH Sabal Palm
3.0
N/A
Comments Average palm
126- 13" DSH Sabal Palm
20
N/A
Comments Overhcad canopy willI estnct growth
127- 12" DBH Sabal Palm
40
N/A
g
c::>
C'J
co
!
1-
U
o
Comlnents The crock at the top glves thIS paInl very good de5thetlc. appeal
a good candidate tor preservatIOn
,....
z
W 0:
~ W
0... I-
o <r
---1 5
UJ if) n'
>UJ-~
w<,2t.J
O>....J
o::u
O/lw, '
l') U) LL I
Z 0
Z ~
Z [)
S
0..
128- M ulU-5tem Llgw,trum
2.5
N/A
Comments ThIS rlee nas ;1 lopslOed crown bur couln be reswled to ;1 u~efUI free wnh
proper prul1lng and general care, Ie, proper fcrtlhzatlOn, watenng etc
129- 9" DBH Queen Palm
3.0
N/A
Comment') Nice palm but w1l1 eventually grow 1I1to the canopy of tree #130
130- S 1" DBH Live Oak
4.5
18'N, 42'S, 18'E, S1 'W
Commcnts I hiS tree has a ul1lque appcarance due to a dr,lmallc lean to the west It has
good <;tluctUlC 111 the uppel Clown and velY appealIng blanch aldlltectllle rhele]S no
dIS(,,.;I mble de(,ay aJ ound the lout collar 1 0 ~Upp01 t ~uch d seveLe lean thIS ll,.;,.; hZls
developed an extenSive root ~ysLem LO the ~ast 'I hiS 1<; one of the finest tree') on the site
Jnd shaUl a be lncorpOIared uno the site deSign if thiS nee IS to be preservea It w]11 be
necessary to protect the rootmg zone to the east It IS cntlcally Important not to Impact the
Imge 5tl uct uHll lootS to the east If necessm y a lentll type footel S) stem should be
constructed over thiS tree's root system
11 L 8" [JBR Qu""en P",lm
l ~ l ~ ....... 1 ~ U.i.Lll
'") -
_.:'
N/A
Cl1111mcnts TIllS is a good palm but the pIe~ence of tlee #130 'wIll pleveJlt the canopy
from sprcadmg
132- 13" DBH Sabal Palm
2.0
N/A
ORIGINAL
Coml11-.:nts 1111s palm (,\)uld I.P0\\. Ihl0ugh <In eXI~tlllg openmg m the canopy of tJee
# 130 but ultImately the canop1es Will compete
133- 12" DBH Sabal Palm
N/A
1 5
Comments This palm will llkely grow to the 'South tar sunlight but will encountel the
oak cdllOpy Palm should probably be removed
134- 13" DBH Sabal Palm
N/A
3.0
Coml11enb 1 hI,', pdlm has a Ullve m the tlUnh. dnd l~ gIu\>vmg towaJd the soulhed~\ illS
an attractive palm wlth a large crown but restnU~ the VIew of tree # 130'5 crown NOTE
i lee # 1 30, J.S noted above, 15 d U1l1Q ue tree wIth serpenu ne oranches A dccl '3Jon should
be made conccrnmg the fdte of tree #'5, 125, 126 127, 129, 131, ] 32,133, and 134 The
deslgnel can 1.;,:a\..: thIS alea as a stand with the palms, oak. and hgustll.m Ot Icmoval some
or all of the pal ms to ')howcase the Stl ucture of the oak
135- Oleander cluster (Nermm oleander)
l\Tf '"
..1..'1..... li.
2.0
COlllments This ShlLlb has some vmes and IS lllegul81 m shape but cali be lestoled Vvlth
prumng
136- Oleander cluster
N/A
2.5
COl11mcnb Small c1ustel of oJeandeb that could be shaped and ll1corpow1ed mto site
landscape
137- 14' OBI-! Sabal Palm
1.0
N/A
Comments TIns palm IS located on the Palm Bluff nght of way aJld under utllIty wires
alld light Ask City to remove thIS tree
138- 10" DBH Queen Palm
N/A
r(~
lOJ
[1&0
~
=
0d111
g
0d111
has a 'C'}I ~
l___
2.5
Comments Will Improve 1f II1corporated mto sIte landscap1l1g and fertlll7cd
""'=T
<=I
~
co
I
t;
C)
139 Podocarpu~ cluster (Podocarpus maoophy//u<;) 2.0
N/A
CommenL~ RemOve unle,',5 11 IS u,',ed as eXlstll1g landSl.<lpmg
140- 15" DBH 'Sabal Pdm
N/A
3.5
COfLU11ents ThIS palm is located 011 the Palm BlLiff lIght of \Nay and
trunk but needs prunmg
l-
Z
L1J
:2;
0-
o :
--.J U) .
~wi
wQi
0> '
<<l c: I
\.,LI
(DU)
Z
Z
z
:5
0-
ORIGINAL
141- 8' ] I" DBH Cherry Ldurel
1.0
N/A
Comment::. J hiS tJ CC IS on the PdJm Bluff nght of WdY dnd I~ ~cveidy dedll1l11g C0I11,ld
City for removal
142- 4" DSH Podocarpus
20
N/A
Comment') ThIs tree has poor appearance recommend removal
143- 21' DBH Live Oak
35
26 N, 10'S, 36'E, 25'\\1
COl11l11cnb IhI~ tlee hd~ good CIO\Vl1 Jl2n~lty dl1d appcalmg stludlllc Piopel pllll1l1lg
wlil slgt1lficantly enhance aesthetic appeal nllS tree IS one 01 a stand dnd con~equently
grows to the north due to competition from adJacent trees Preserve as part of a stand
144- 18 21' DBH Live Odk
2.5
u'N, 36 S, 36'[ 20'\\7
COIT..Jnents Tl11S tree h3S been devalued due to the presence of d Lo-domlnant steIn lo'v In
the trunk Cabhng and bracmg can nlltlgate this situatIon Thl'i procedure IS highly
lecol11mended us the tlee IS sItuated 011 the Palm Bluff lIght of way and pedesul.:ll1S and
vehIGles wlil be targets 't ree's canopy should be elevated over road ThIs tree IS a
v:lluable memoer of an anractIve siano or live oakS Uldl enllance lile adJacem plOpell)
and should be preserved The City may be wtllmg to share the cost of cabhng and bracll1g
thiS tree
145- 20' DBH Live Oak
3.0
] 5'N 20'S, O'E, 2] 'W
Comments ThiS tree IS on the Palm Bluff nght of way and togethel with trees # 143 and
144 makc a very attractive stand The stand wlll show slgnrficant Improvement In health
and appearance If properly pruned ThlS tree has a small and IITcgular crown due to
competition but works well 111 the aforementIOned stand TillS tree has IIltelestlllg
tWIStll1g, droopmg branche':i that give It character Tree ha<; very good Grown denSity
146- ] 2" DBH Camphor
1.5
N/A
Comments IE~ 'thIS llee IS on the ral1l1 Bluff light of way and has pOOl f0l111, ",ill
damage the curb and IS competmg wIth deSirable native ltve oak stand Thl<; tree should
be removed Contact CIty dl1d request removal
147- 8 ' DI3H Queen Palm
2.5
N/A
Commems 'fillS tree IS on me Palm Bluff nghl of way ana IS growlllg IIllO llle cmoples
of tree #5 143,144 and 145 The tree Will have trouble III the future as It attempts to grow
through the I..dnopy I he e1Ted 1:) not all bad and the deC15lO11 to pI e:-.el Vf, 111l.~_1I w..-sbOl,lld """"1
rest WIth the sIte deSIgner 0 [E (C [E ~ Vi [E 0\:
OCT - 8 2OIl4 I
PLANNING & CEVELOPMENT
S ER'JICES
\ ~,l.
...
~ Clearwater
()~
~
,
Planning Department ~ R t G' N A L
100 South Myrtle Ave e
Clearwater, Flonda 33
Telephone 727-562-4567
Fax 727-562-4865
!:l SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
o SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION Including
1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans
Q SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ 10000
CASE #:
DATE RECEIVED
RECEIVED BY (s1a
ATLAS PAGE #
ZONING DISTRICT
LAND USE CLASSifiCATION
SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT
PROPERTIES
NORTH
SOUTH
WEST
EAST
* NOTE 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS)
FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
Single Family (LOR or LMDR only) Residentiallnfill Project (ReVised 11118/03)
~PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT"""
A APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION (Code Section 4-202.A)
APPLICANT NAME Wlsne Development llC
MAILING ADDRESS 3408 Beacon Street. Pompano Beach. FL 33602
PHONE NUMBER 248-737-7247 FAX NUMBER
PROPERTY OWNER(S) Wlsne~ Development. LLC
(Must Include ALL owners as listed on the deed - proVide anginal slgnalu
AGENT NAME Kerth E Zavac. P E . c/o Kerth Zavac & ASSOCiates, Inc
MAILING ADDRESS 701 Enteronse Road East. Ste 404. Safety Harbor, Fl34695
PHONE NUMBER 727-793-9888 FAX NUMBER 727-793-9855
CELL NUMBER 0)+4. 1f109
E-MAIL ADDRESS kelth@
B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION (Code Section 4-202.A)
STREET ADDRESS of subJect site 300 Pl7ftn bluFF /ICA()(P
,
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
See attached deed
Of not listed here please nOle the locahon 01 th IS document In the subm Ittal}
09129/15165448/00010100. 09/29115165448100010130
PARCEL NUMBER
-,
,....-=~
Prell' [1'-.
s8~J~~ \~~ ,_L~::_~_ - __
~\ I I I J I
\ ! Sr-D 2 9 LUU4 I, ~J
L- I
PL!'\ 'c"," -'::::LOPMENl
:.o:::8VICES
t'""" or: CLEARWATER
O~ {l~
PARCEL SIZE 7 62 acres
(acres, square feet)
PROPOSED USE(S) AND SrZE(S) 8 smale familY lots and common area
(number of dwelling Units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonreSidential use)
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S) See attachment A
Attach. sheets and be SpecifiC whenldentlfYlIlg the reqllest (Include all r~uested code deVIations, e 9 reduction In reqUired number 01 part<.lI1g spaces, Specific use, etc)
DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TOR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO !... (If yes, attach a copy of the applicable documenlf
C PROOF OF OWNERSHIP. (Code Section 4-202.A.5)
~ SUBMIT A COpy OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATIESTING OWNERSHIP (see
page 6)
D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A)
tiL Provide complete responses to the SIX (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - explain how each cntena IS achIeved, In detad
1 The proposed development of Ihe land will be In harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, denSity and character of adjacent properties In which It
IS located
See attachment B
2 The proposed developmenl will nol hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacenlland and bUildings or Significantly
Impair the value thereof
See attachment B
3 The proposed development WIll nol adversely affect the health or safety or persons resIding or wor1l.1ng In the neIghborhood of the proposed
use
See attachment B
f'?0~rfl e;C';-~
4 The proposed development IS designed to minimIZe traffic congestJon [)) IE rc C ,..' I ,~ -,
o ~ ,- , '
See attachment B '7~__ 1_ _ ~~ ! \ I
..r-- II, III
I \ I SFP 2 9 LuU4 I, jJI
' \ I
1 ,
5 U l 1-==-1
The p"""""" _opmeol ~ "'.......01 wrth ... oomm"nty ......-. of... r....... ~""",of'" - .......... fo< -"'1""'01
'), ,r- ~ ~1P~ 'ENl
SeeattachmentB . , ,',CES
, ':'_b,RWATER
'------
6 The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including Visual, acoustIc and olfactory and hours of operallon Impacts,
on adlacent properties
See attachment B o EUGlNAL
lIif- PrOVide complete responses to the seven (7) RESIDENTIALINFILL PROJECT CRITERIA - Explain how each cntena IS actlleved, In detal!
The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development IS otherwise Impractical without deviations from the Intenstly and
development standards
See attachment C
2 The development of the parcel proposed for development as a res Idenlla I Infill project WIll not matenally reduce the fair market value of
abutting properties (Include the eXisting value of the srte and the proposed value of the site WIth the Improvements)
See attachment C
3 The uses Within the resldentlallnfill prolect are otherwise perrmtted In the City of Clearwater
See attachment C
4 The uses or mix of use WIthin the resldentlallnfil1 prOject are compatible With adjacent land uses
See attachment C
5 The development of the parcel proposed for development as a resldentlallnfill project will upgrade the Immediate VIClnrty of the parcel
proposed for development
See attachment C
6 The design of the proposed resldentlallnfill project creates a form and function that enhances the communrty character of the Immediate
vlclnrty of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole
See attachment C
7 Flexibility In regard to lot Width, reqUired setbacks, height and off-street parking are Justified by the benefits to community character and the
Immediate VICinity of the parcel proposed for development and the Crty of Clearwater as a whole
See attachment C
E STORMWATER PLAN SUBMm AL REQUIREMENTS. (City of Clearwater Design Criteria Manual and
4-202.A 21)
"
."...-
----;;,-
~
-/
-,-
2"
l!J"-.
STORMWATER PLAN including the following reqUirements
Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines,
Proposed grading Includmg finished floor elevations of all structures,
All adjacent streets and mUniCipal storm systems,
Proposed stormwater detenllonlretentlon area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure,
Stormwater calculallons for attenuation and water quality,
Signature of Flortda registered Professional EngIneer on all plans and calculaltons
COpy OF PERMIT INQUIRY lETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL
(SWFWMD approvalls required pnor to Issuance of City BUilding Permt), If applicable
ORIGINAL
-PbIGATleN~aQPlica6le n-
r0J fC P ~\ 1/ I c:
o ) \\:1lS U \'J~' ~
\ SEP 2 9 ~
r::::::\
\~
o
COPY OF STATE AND COUNTY STORMWATER SYSTEM TIE-IN PERMIT A
pI !~, ~
o r'"
en" ry '_
)
F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A)
e... SI~ED AND SEALED SURVEY (Including legal descnptlon of property) - One ongmal and 14 COpies,
~ 0,E_~ SURVEY (mcludmg eXlstmg trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent Site, by species, sIZe (DBH 4" or greater), and location,
Includmg dnp lines and Indlcatmg trees to be removed) - please deSign around the eXlsung trees,
Itir LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY, V
o
PARKING DEMAND STUDY m conJuncbon with a request to make deviations to the parlung standards (Ie Reduce number of spaces) Prior to
the submlllal of thIS application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Commumty Development Coordmator and shall be m
accordance WIl:h accepted traffic engmeenng pnnClples The findmgs of the study Will be used m determining whether or not deViations to the
parl(lng standards a~e ~ved,
GRADING PLAN, ~PPllcable,
PRELIMINARY PLAT, a~ed (Note BUlldmg permlls Will not be ISSUed until evidence of recordmg a final plat IS provided),
R!L
IfiL
o
COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable,
G. S~LAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS (Section 4-202 A)
a SITE PLAN wllh the follOWing information (not to exceed 24" x 36")
An dimenSIOns,
North arrow,
Englneenng bar scale (mmlmum scale one Inch equals 50 feel), and dale prepared,
Location map,
Index sheet referenCIng mdNldual sheets Included In package,
Footpnnt and size of all EXISTING bUlldmgs and structures,
Footpnnt and size of all PROPOSED bUlldmgs and structures,
All required setbacks,
All eXlstmg and proposed pomts of access,
All required Sight tnangles,
Identification of envIronmentally umque areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen
trees, Includmg descnptlon and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc,
localion of aU publiC and pnvate easements,
Location of all street nghts-of-way wlthm and adjacent to the slle,
Location of eXisting public and pnvate Uti lilies, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer hnes, manholes and Ilft stations, gas
and water lines,
All parking spaces, dnveways, loadmg areas and vehicular use areas,
Depiction by shadmg or crosshatchmg of all reqUired parkmg lot mlenor landscaped areas,
location of all solid waste containers, recyclmg Of trash handllng areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screenmg {per
Section 3-201 (0)(1) and Index #701},
_ Location of all landscape matenal,
_ Location of all onslte and Offslte storm-water management faCIlities,
_ Location of all outdoor IIghtmg fixtures, and
_ Location of all eXisting and proposed Sidewalks
~ "'IT~TA TABLE for eXlstmg, reqUired, and proposed development, m wnllen/tabular form
_ V l~~d area m square feet and acres,
_ Number of EXISTING dweJllng Units,
_ Number of PROPOSED dwelling Units,
Gross floor area devoted to each use,
Parkmg spaces total number, presented m tabular form With the number of reqUired spaces,
Total paved area, includIng all paved parkmg spaces and dnveways, expressed m square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area,
Size and species of all landscape matenal,
OffiCial records book and page numbers of all eXlstmg ubllty easement,
BUilding and structure heights,
Impermeable surface rallo (I S R ), and
I ~r area rallo (F A R) for all nonresldenllal uses
~ MEDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 Y2 X 11) and color rendering If pOSSible,
~ f,O~VElOPMENTS O~ER ONE ACRE, proVide the followmg additional mformallon on slle pia
_ l7 ~~e-foot contours or spot elevatIons on site,
_ Offslte elevations If reqUired to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel,
_ All open space areas,
_ locallon of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms,
Lot lines and bUilding lmes (dimensioned),
Streets and dnves (dimenSioned),
BUlldmg and stNcturat setbacks (dImenSIoned),
i:~~::n~~~~~~gpS~red by a "certified amonst", of all trees 8' DBH or greater, reflecting Size, canopy (dQI21nGlcW,Alu trees
Ol~~[Er {~ rr=\o
Jul SEP ~dm Ji ~
PL^f\'~JI" -
Nl
r
------
.... r;::::::J~r;::::::Jnl\ nr:::::l r---~
;' 0 ):t: I ~___'_' 'II ' L..
H. L~ND CAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) ,~\~' _~
,I(j ( NDSCAPE PLAN ')
All existing and proposed structures, J ""1' ! })
Names of abutbng streets, f " ,r-o 2 ~ '- ~.i II '_
Dramage and retentJon areas mcludlng swales, side slopes and bottom elevations, l \
Del!neallon and dimensions of all required pen meter landscape buffers,
Sight Vlslblhty triangles, L----~__ __-----.J
Delineation and dlmenS10ns of all parkmg areas including landscaping Islands and curbing, PLJ\' "':," -'_ 'lPMENl
Proposed and reqUired parking spaces, ~ ~ n v I, ':S
EXISting trees on-sIte and Immediately adjacent to the site, by speCIes, sIze and locations, mclvdmg dnphn~.JasllQ9lc<!!~ on1WA TER
reqUJred tree survey),
Plant schedule WIth a key (symbol or label) Indicating the Size, descnptlon, specifications and quantllles of all eXJstmg and proposed
landscape matenals, mcludmg botamcal and common names,
Locallon, SIze, and quantities of all eXJstmg and proposed landscape matenals, Indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule,
Typical plantmg details lor trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants Including instructIOns, 5011 mixes, backfilling, mulching and
protective measures,
Intenor landscaping areas hatched andlor shaded and labeled and mtenor landscape coverage, expressing In both square feet and
percentage covered,
Conditions of a previous development approval (e g conditions Imposed by the Community Development Board),
Irngatlon notes
~UCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 1'2 X 11) (color rendenng If pOSSible),
'A
o IRRIGATION PLAN (reqUired lor level two and three approval),
CI COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM appl1cation, as appl!cable
I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23)
ReqUired In the event the apphcatlon Includes a development where deSign standards are In Issue (e g Tounst and Downtown Dlstncts) or as part
of a Comprehensive Inflfl Redevelopment PrOject or a Residentlallnflll Project
~ L.sG;LDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all Sides of all bUildings Including height dimenSions, colors and matenals,
~ ,
~ REDUCED BUILDING ELEV~ONS - four Sides of bUilding With colors and matenals to scale (81'2 X 11) {black and white and color renoenng, If
pOSSible) as reqUired -------
J.
SIGNAGE' (DIVISiOn 19. SIGNSI Section 3-1806) (-Sl ""tZ:'U -?~IL~ -A:? A 4;M':r"
~ ( -p'\t(:]~ "\
All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs, ProVIde photographs dImensions (area, helgh'( etc), indicate whether they Will be removed or
to remain
lJ
"---"
All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs, ProVide details I ludlng location, Size, height, colors, matenals and draWing, freestanding signs
shaJllnclude the street address (numerals)
lJ ComprehensNe Sign Program application, as applicable (sep te apphcatJon and fea reqUIred)
a
a Reduced slgnage proposal (8 v., X 11) (color), If submltllng omprehenslve Sign Program appllcatlon
K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY' {Section 4-202
o
de the acceptable level 01 service for any roadway as adopted In the ComprehenSive Plan
11101'1 of the Institute of Transportation Engmeer's Trip General Manual Refer to Sacllan 4-801
to thiS reqUirement
L.
C Signature of prope
M \<'l-...u&~.u WIAYAJE
STATE OFF'~ COUNTY OF P)lU:1,.M.S +J.
S m to and subSCribed before me this 1 f; - day of
+4... '0 ("", A D 20~ to me and/or by
(.. D , who IS personally known has
produced \:)",\J ~(<:. L Lit' ~'5.i? as
Id~e !catlon
_~~'4:)~.J
No ry public,
My commission expIres
NOTARY PUBLIC.. WAYNE. MI
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES AUG 17,2006
/'
AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT:
Wl~E::. ""DE~JFto-\~ l".vc..- ~ At.A.u Wl~ ,~--E: ~
,
~--..::;:-
~ -,.,tJ-
(Names 'ota1ij)foperty owners on deed - please PRINT full names)
That (J amlwe are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of lhe followmg descnbed property (address or general location)
,,:>~e:.- ,A."1"'1h:~ ~~
2 That thiS property constitutes the property for which a request for a (descnbe request)
B uY\ "71Ut4Le ~\l..;"(" ~tJfi!;Pt"l"7\Ol.l ~ ~P'tt..-tOW t\f1;::/\
3 That the underSigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint
.
e'
as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any pelltlons or other documents necessaJY to affect such p&tlllon,
4 That this affidaVit has been executed to Induce the City of ClealWater, Flonda to consider and act on the above descnbed prope ,
5 That site VISIts to the property are necessary by CIty representallves In order to process thiS application and the owner auth
representatives to vlsll and photograph the property described In this appllcal1on,
6 That (Jlwe), the undersigned authonty, hereby cerllfy that the foregoing IS true and correct
"---./
l.U ~'1 JJ E::
COUNTY OF PI'N'Et'LA:S
My Commission Expires
CHRISTINE BOSS
NOTARY PUBLIC - WAYNE. MI
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES AUG 17,2006
O hY(~~l\\fl~, ~
b ~7 l:.::J lu ~' I ~ I
---' I
\~D 2 ~ '
'-.-<: 'L----
ti \Plannmg Depal1men/lAppilcat/on Formsldava/opmen/ /'llVlsw\2003 FORMSlsmgla family res/d lIal mfill appllC8./IDn 2003 doc .
\ ~>LI' r, '
:l J I
~'-- [I e'l
-0 R \ G-\ NA L-
Aug 16 04 04:10p
f"'.....
08/11/04 02-38 FAX
iii 002
CERTIFiCATE OIF JI,ESOUJTlON
OF ~AGJ:R. Olli'
WDSNE DEVELOPlbiENT, .ILLC
1. the underStglled, hereby certify that I am the sole Mnnager of WisDe Development, LLC,
a Flonda hmlt.ed liability (,Ompany (the "Company") lrJ.d tbauhe following IS a true and coned: copy
oia resolutionadopkd by the sole Manager of the Company 3S of August] 1, 2004
"WHEREAS. it 1$ m the best interest oftb:: Company thai checkmg and/or savings accounts
" b~e established with Bank of Amenea,. N A. ("Bank") in the name of the Company and that
ge~eral banking business be authonzcd on be:mlf of the Company;
/~
11 be and IS ~ authonzed to establish
D. ct genemf banking busmess with
"NOW THEREFORE
~BE IT RESOLVED that the Company
checkmg and/or saVings accoml.ts with c
me Bank and throU8h such accounts, nd
"BE IT FURTHER R.E.SOL VED J~bn !hec refOlden! of the Company,
whose Slgnatun: is as fol1o.ws: I Ix and he is hereby
autbon"d. empowered and lbr l the e on beba1f o.f the Company to
make. enter into. cltecme.and d 11 r ~th to B, any documents necCSSB!)' to
estilbhshund ma!maln any thee g a~d1or sa~' in 'accounts.....,tb Bank, and to. make
deposiu to and wi1hdrawals b SUtjf accol.Gl on behalf of Company "
] do further cer\.lfy that . d a~ k the; ,.anager of Ehe Company was duly lakeD 1D
acwidance with the Operatmg ment of !he ])any. that then: is no provisiollln the ArtIcles
of Organizauoo. or OperatLl\g A ement ofth oU!p~ny hmHing the power of the ~agerto pass
thE! foregomg resolllbon and the same' m c;onfo -uuty with the provIsions of said Art1cles of
Organization and Operating Agr
IN WITNESS WHEREOF. I have hereunto <;ub$cnbed my name as sole Manager oflfte
Company, pursuant to due and lawful authority, as of August] \,2004
~~~
rlan L Wasee, Sole Manager
ORfGINAL ~-(
~
,
PLAN~II' ,..
c r
,
CITY 0' ,~
'-
! . d 60t9-Stv-tt2 eustM ~l u~aJ en:n VO 2i Snl::l
09~16/2004 14 52 ~AX 727 712 3443
Sunbelt Tltl~ ,geney
liliOO2l005
, '
This Warranty Deed
3408 BEACON STREET
POMPANO BEACH, FL 33602
o.1[~~n~~~~ ~~9~
.. I '
r="\ ' I ~r-D 2 9 LuiJ4 II" /
J L!I I ~~"
L~__ __ _--.J
PLf,' , I IJPMENl
\
"-
Made this 15th day of July, 2004 by
HANS JOACHIM PERLEBERG AND BETTINA
PERlEBERG. HUSBAND AND WIFE
herfunafter called the grantor, tp
WISNE DEVELOPMENT, LLC
whose post office address IS
~ EhJ,:'::ES
Cln' OF CLEAqWATER
heremafter called the grantee
(Whenever used herem the term 'grantor" and "grantee" Include all the partres to thiS Instrument and the heirs, legal representatives and
assIgns of mdlvlduals, and the successors and assIgns of corporations)
Witnesseth, that the grantor, fur and If\ consideration of the sum of $10_00 and other villuable consideratIons, receIpt whereof IS hereby
acknowledged, hereby grants, bargaIns sells alrens, remIses, releases conveys and conflons unto the grantee, all that certaIn land situate rn
PINELLAS County, Flonda, VIZ
Parcel 1
Begm on the West hne of Osceola Avenue at the Southeast comer of Lot 14, Palm Bluff SUbdivIsion, according to t~e Map
or Plat thereof, as recorded In Pial Book 5, Page 14, of the Public Records of Plnellas County, Florida, then go N15?22'41"
E a distance of 9773', thence N80004'57"W a distance of 37335', thence S07044'33"W a distance of 105 53' Thence
S81023'01"E a distance of 35609' to the Point of Beglnmng Together with any and all npanan and Illloral fights thereunto
appertaining
Parcel 2
Commence on the West hne or Osceola Avenue al the Southeast corner of Lot 14, palm Bluff SUbdIVISIon, according to
the Map or Plat thereof, as recorded In Plat Book 5, age 14, of the Public Records of Plnellas County, Flonda, thenl go
N15022'41"E a dIstance of97 73' to a pOInt of beginning, thence continue N 15"22'41 "E a dIstance of 119 81' Thenl:e
N79000'OO"Wa dIstance of 149 94' thence S15OZ3'09"W a distance of 44 75', thence N7go10'52"W a distance of 129 32'
',-- Thence S17024'09"W a dIStance of 8079', thence go S80"04'57"E a distance of 32672 to the Pomt of Beginning, together
With any and all riparian and littoral rights thereunto appertaining
Parcel 3
Beginning at the Southwest comer of Lot 1 0 of pALM BLUFF, according to the plat thereof recorded In Plat Book 5, Page
14, PlneUas County Records, same being at average high water line Clearwater Bay, thence Westeny 705 feet on and
along the prOjected South line of said Lot 10, thence In a Northerly course to a pOint opposite to and parallel With the
prOjected North line of the South 38 3 feet of Lot 11 of said subdllllSIon, thence Easterly 705 feet to the Northwest comer
of saId 38 3 feet of Lot 11, same being at the average high water line of Clearwater Bay, thence In a Southerly course
along average high water line to a POint of Beglnl1lng, all lYIng and being m SectIon 9, Township 29 South, Range 15 East,
County of PlneUas, State of Flonds
Parcel 4
From the Southeast of Gover~ment Lot 2, Section 9, TownShip 29 South, Range 15 East. run North 8304 feet along the
East line of said SectIOn 9, thence North 79 degrees 00' West 1323 96 feet to POlOt of BeglnnlOg, same being at
Northwest corner of Lot 17, PALM BLUFF SUBDIVISION and average high water line of Clearwater Bay, thence North 79
degrees 00' West 1612 7 feet to East side of channel, thence Soulh 21 degrees 13' East 184 2 feet, thence South 80
degrees OT East, 15039 feet to the Southwest corner of property formerly owned by A.A. LINCOLN AND WILLIAM P
RICHARDS, same being at average high water line, Clearwater Bay, thence North 15 degrees 54' East 127 feet to POIT1.t of
Beginning, alllYlOg and belOg In Section 9, Township 29 South, Range 15 East, PlneUas County, Flonda
Less that part thereof conveyed by Warranty Deed recorded In Deed Book 1385, page 195, Pubhc Records of PIne lias
County, Flonda
Subject to covenants, restrictIons, easements of record end t1xes fOf the current year
ParcelldentJficatron Number 09/ztI15/6544814l OOJ01 00, 09/29/151854481000/0130
Together With alllf1a tenements heredltamef1ts and appurtenances thereto belonging or In anywise appertaining
To Have and to Hold, the same In fee Simple forever
And the grantor hereby covenants WIth said grantee that 100 grantor IS lewfully serzed of sard land In fee SImple, that the grantor has good
fight and lawful authonty to sell and convey said land, that the grantor hereby fully warrants the tItle to said land and Will defend the same
''-_-' agamst the lawful claIms of all persor1s whomsoever, and lllat said land IS free of all enclImbrances except taxes accrumg sUbseQuenl to
December 31, 2003 '
In Wltll88B Whereof lhe said grantor has SlQned and sealed lhase presents the day !lIld year first above WTltlen
ORIGINAL
Q91l b/l004 J 4 53 FAX 727 7 J 2 344 J
~unbelt T1tJe ~gcncy
~
Province of
Counby of
@003/005
I
(Signature)
HANS
The foregoing Instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of July, 2(104, by HANS JOA.CHIM PERL.EBERG AND BETTINA
PERLE BERG, HUSbAND AND WIFE, who Is personally known to me or who has produced as Identification
NOTARY PUBLIC (signature)
Print Name
My CommISsion Expires
Stamp/Seal
Preparod,by and Returned to
Jacqueline- A Utl1atadter
Sunbelt Title Agency
406 S Aurora Awt
Clearwater, Fl. 33785
File Number 786040366
,,~
PLANNING '::
SErl,'
CITY OF CL l
ORIGINAL
09~lb/2004 14 53 FAJ 727 712 3443
SUllbel t '1'1 t J e Agency
~004/005
,,~
Urkundenrolle Nr. 103 fUr das Jahr 2004
Die vor IDlf gelclsteten Unterschnftcn
1) des Herro Hans-Joachun Perleberg, geb am 02,05 1948,
wohnbaft Bahrenbergring 19,45259 Essen,
- ausgewlesen durch V odage seines gultIgen Reisepasses N r 5041477314-
2) der Frau Bettina Perleberg, geb am 10,02.1958,
wohnhaft Bahrenbergnng 19,45259 Essen,
- ausgewlesen durch Vorlage thres gtiltlgen Relsepasses Nr 5041508155-
3) der Zeugm Petra Hoffmann, geb am 24 12 1966,
dleostansiisslg Am Handelsbof 1, 45127 Essen,
- dem Notar von Person bekannt-
4) dcr Zeugm Marclke Schr6der, geb. am 1207 1984,
dlenstansasslg Am H andelsho[ 1, 45127 Essen,
- dem Notar von PCr<ion bekannt-
beglaublge Ich htermit
DIe Betedlgten erklarten 1m Hinbhck auf 9- 3 Abs. 1 Satz I Nr 7 BeurkG vor Beglau-
blgung und auf Befragen des begldublgenden Notars, daB wedcr der beglaublgende
Notar noch Personen, mlt denen slch dleser zur gememsamcn Berufsausubung
verbunden hat, auBerhalb ihrer Amtst1ibgkelt mIl dleser Angelegenhelt befallt waren
oder smd
Essen, den 13 Juli 2'004
NL6 t:;;
PLANNIW-: F I
8ERv'I(
CIT'r Of: ClE,
rr;rN A L
T
ATTACHMENT A
DESCRJPTION OF REQUESTS
· ReductIOn 111 fTont setbacks for lots 1-8
· ReductIOn In rear setback for lot 7
· Increase 111 buIlding heIght for lots 1-8
~ t?0 rc n\\fi I~ r;o",
o ~~L=_~~~~~~! '
~ ::1)1
~2~ .! ! 0
PLANNlr 1(. " 1
St-Il
CITY or C
ORIGINAL
ATTACHMENT B
GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA RESPONSES
1 The proposed development of the land will be m harmony wllh the scale, bulk,
wverage, density and character of adjacent propertle" m which illS located
The proposed smgle-famIly homes WIll range m SIze from approxImately 2,900
SF to 4,090 SF WIthin lots that exceed the 5,000 SF mimmum WIthm the LMDR
zomng. The character of the houses will be timeless classic art deeo to create the
sense of community WIthm The surroundmg houses are larger in nature along the
waterfront and contam many older homes WIth similar classic architecture.
2 The proposed development will not hmder or dl~courage the appropnate
development and use of adjacent land and bulldmgs or 31gnificantly lmpmr the
value thereof
The proposed 8-umt development wIll encourage the redevelopment of the older
homes WIthm the cnteria set forth 111 tbe LMDR zoning The homes WIll
generally be very high homes wlthm a fenced and gated commumty The value of
the surrounding properties should mcrease In value With the redevelopment of this
property.
3 The proposed development wIll not adver~ely affect the health or safety or
persons resldmg or workmg m the neighborhood of the proposed use
The development lI1cludes 8 single famIly reSidences that fit lI1to the existll1g use
of the area and does not mclude any commercial use that may adversely affect the
health or safety of the neighborhood.
4 The proposed development IS deSigned to mmlmlze traffic congeMlOn
The development includes an internal private roadway system that servIces 6 of
the 8 smgle-farmly reSidences The Internal roadway mlmmlzed the proposed
access opemngs to a total of 4 mcludmg two private dnveways and two roadway
connectIOns The northern entrance of the proJect extends the current Sunset
Dnve dead end and continues to an mtersection With Palm Bluff Street
5 The proposed development IS consistent wllh the commumty (haracter of the
lmmedzate Vlcmlty of the parcel proposed for development
The proposed smgle-famIly development is conSistent WIth the eXisting smgle-
fmmly reSidential neighborhood
6
The deSign of the proposed development mmlmlzes adve';le.....!fficts. mcludmg l
v,maI. acOU},/IC and olfaclory and hours oj operatIOn Impact 0 [E ~ [E ~ Vi ~ ,\ 0 ~ 'I
OR\G\NAL f1 \:0 29 LC' ii
~ _J
[NT
The project mInImiZeS the acoustic and olfactory tmpacts of the project by
eonstructmg a 6-foot high fence along the publIc nghts of way Landscape
buffers and the fence along the property lines mmlmize the visual impacts The
project only contams 8 residentlal uruts, and wIll not mclude any busmesses or
commercIal development
PI'
~)-
,,\
::'r
~ ., (;
OR1G\NAL
,(C~-- '
I __
r-'" -~~
~~
~~
~
r--="-::J
rULQ
f? _~
ATTACHMENT C
RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECT CRITERIA
The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development H
otherwise Impractical without devwtlOns from the mtenslty and development
'itandard'i
The deviatIOns requested mclude setbacks and height only. There tS no request
for deVIatIOns from mtensity The project site is very unusual for the CIty of
Clearwater and contains severe topographic changes, numerous large trees and
two abandoned houses. The proposed development seeks a deviation from the
allowable height to elevate the houses above the eXisting grade by the use of pters
rather than slab on grade to mimmIze fill and other Impacts to the eXIstmg tree
root systems. The setback vanances are requested for the use of multi-story
houses with Irregular shapes that work around eXIstmg tree locatIOns and provide
for an Internal pnvate roadway system
2 The development of the parcel proposed for development as a resldentwl mjill
project will not matenally reduce the faIr market value of abuttmg propertles
The eXIsting value of the property WIth the two abandoned homes IS
approximately $ 2.0 millIon The eight proposed houses WIll sell for In excess of
$ 1 0 million, which WIll slgmficantly mcrease the faIr market value of abuttmg
propertIes
3 The uses wahm the resldentwl mjill project are otherwise permllted m the Cay of
Clearwater
The proJect includes 8 smgle-family houses that are permItted withm the LMDR
and other surrounding zonmgs
4. The uses or mIX of use wlthm the resident wI mfill project are compatIble wllh
a4Jacent land uses
~
C)
~
O"l
N
0-
l!..J
V)
The development lI1c1udes only smgle-famlly reSIdences WIth a mll1lmUm floor
area of2,960 SF, which are compatlble WIth surroundmg houses.
\
I
5;: fhe development of the parcel proposed for development as a resldentzal mjill
~: f l(roject wIll upgrade the lmmedzate VICInity of the parcel propm.ed for
~ ~ Jevelopment
u::: (f) ii \
~.> uJ A
L~' g wThe proposed development of 8 smgle-family high-end homes wlil replace the
C>.-ll . . .
<>6 ffi l.two eXlstmg abandoned houses that are m a state of disrepair The mfill prOject
~ (f) C ill also save a significant amount of eXlstmg trees that and maintam the wooded
~ ~c aracter of the site and lInmedtate area The houses will be of higher value than
'5 0
0..
1
OR\GlNAL
the eXlstmg surrounds older homes and will potentially mcrease the value of the
surroundIng properties
6 The de5lgn of the proposed resldenualmfill project creates a form and functwn
that enhances the commumty character of the lmmedwte vlclmty of the parcel
proposedfor development and the City of Clearwater a5 a whole
The form of the project IS centered on savmg the existmg worthwhIle tree on the
property. Great care has been taken to design the houses to create a sense of
tuneless archItecture while provldmg unique footpnnts around and above the
eXlstmg tree root system The mtemal dnveway is free flowmg rather than ngId
to further work with the eXlstmg topography and create a sense of amval and
commuruty
7 Flexlblbty m regard to lot width, reqUired setbacks, height and off-street parkmg
are Justified by the benefits to commumty character and the lmmedzate vlclmty oj
the parcel proposed/or development and the City a/Clearwater as a whole
The requested flexibilIty in required setbacks and height would allow for the
retentIOn of the eXIstmg canopy vegetation on the slte and m harmony WIth the
immedIate vlcmity
-------
If=-~~
.J1 "
~
~I1 g
? ~
r;:::::::::::-Cl
W ~
s: uJ
~ \-:-
/- .--
..-
Z a::
I;:! u.J
..,: l-
n.. <(
S(/)~
U) uJ -{
?(.)uJ
L.J - ,
c/~
erO
c4 \ jj u..
l" L.~ 0
,-
CL W CoverSheet
FLS2004-09064
c
.
300 PALM BLUFF ST
Date Received: 09/29/2004
PALM BLUFFS
ZONING DISTRICT: LMDR
LAND USE: RU
ATLAS PAGE: 268B
PLANNER OF RECORD: KLG
~-,
------...._~- ......------ --------..-........- -"'........-.. -- --~- -....-
~
1Il
~
~
~
j:I
w
I
::I
S
~
I
~
~oo/~oo~
~'I-'
~ J !~
r -!
ClBIElIEd MClV
--
I I
I' !II
1111 t 11.!lD JIl
IllJl!fIll~fl::lnll
,U..H~mll..
~ .1 I h
111111lItllb~!,4.!L..
IllH IIHI:Wfllnn
ll""",~.lttm
llh'lmlltnl
ld!lU mf
II II III
...~U,L'lIHQog,
d j I In'
; ~lfillill!n~~~
dll<'ltllnUo;/I,ll.ltoll
r
~~-
II
~ b'
lr'
~:
. '
(
~J~~
Ii l
'"' 5
Ii } ."
J, l .....
e/ ~ l->>..-,7i'~
:
r
'~
Ii
r.
I.
~j
h
,
ORIGINAL
~
A::JU"SV "n',L naquns
, i
'jih'
Lv ~
ill'~~~
Ii i-II
Ilf~I.~
;m.l!
~I'!l>~.
~ ,[!~j ~
~I~l'~~ '
;11'~'!i ~
-;'d~ij i
!. :j"!I ij
.lli~'"'
J '~~ij~~ I
~ a"a"~. I
,-
iH
. ~
!~~"
,!"
!n~
, /
i*
~i:i
l!~~
{i J,
J1~
ill ~ _ '
II' JI-
" t .
)\ ~
i
l~
)1
,~ II
I" '
m !i
..~ .,
IE
fi
!~ 19
~I !~
~"',
t"~
· hU,
hi!~~;
"'!bh
IIi' I.
i, ~I~.l:
ll"'. Ii
i":~1~1
<i~~~'.!
h-t~hH ~
,.'kilt S
J!i~~~i;; 1 !
'>1~'iati 0
" . ~. ~ "
,;~~~iVl ~ i!
i I'~ ..!.~ ~
~f;~'''),e I
,.~ii;;~~ll Ii
~r-~
~~~~ oll lol IYJ tS tl vOO,/gl/bO
----.;
....
.......~....\ I
!! ---- I
-- ~ -- -- -J:..c I -.-J
<(
~ .f'-4/i'A L
.. "'4
" 7'.e/i' ~ Z
/'
0-4y I -
'. (0
~. -r- -
...........- .....
~~l~ n:::
~-~- ,.... 0
Z
L.lJ CL
Dill :E L.lJ
<d" 0- f-
a <(
~ c::. UJS
c::. -l
C'.J L.lJ llJ r::
>
= m w 0<
~UJ
Dill N 0> -l
e6a:o
0- LD LL
g. ('JUJ
L!J Z 0
V) z 51
~ -dill] z
", ,r ~ :5
~ (L
i;
....
....
....
-,,"-
-~ -
r .
,
--
-"
!~
.s ~
: x !
n n~
un
; B -< ;
I ~
~
'"
f.l
z
'"
_ A V (
---..
~
( "0
-. Ii'/W)
~ :-:: _=- p ~ m
~ ,~~ "'as ~~ ;;~ ~ g
~ ..~ ~]~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ :
~ . ~ u~' ~ ~~ ~ ~
e3. ~!Z' '>;;'>i'r' ~Q m,. 1"'1
~ !~ ~ ~ ~~;8 ~ il
~ :~ ~; ~i ~~ ... ~ ~_ ~
~.< ~. ~< ~~ ~ ~
~ -; ~ ! ~ ~ ~ ~ i ! l
~_~A U - ~~-~~-~ ~--
~ ~~ :~ ~H~ ;! · ;
~ c ~.. 00 ~~ : ~
~ ~ ~" ~~ i; ~ ~
fj "'?i~; ~ ~
~ ~ ~~ ~~ ,
~~ ~; ~ g
~ ~,. ~ ?-
~" ~~ ~
~m ~
~
~ ~
~T-
~ ~
~ "
g
~
I j
___ __ _ ____ ____ _ ____ ~___ __ _ _ _ _1__
'~~~O~"B' ,- ~"~- -liS' ~~ ~~,~ ~'I~" ~ ~ - p~~ P8~ =~~~
~!~~e~~...~~!~~~! ~~.., ~ ~~ ~~~ ~!~ ~; ;; ~ g i~~ ~.,,~ ~'::~~
-~~i~ -~j~i-~~ii i-~i~~~'~~ ii ~ i~~~H~* f~i~:
~:c E'%'.o::.;<: ~g~ ~ ~ ~~ .;;;;::;. ~~ ~ '=' el: ~;iil:'IlJo ':V~<l' ~",~jfl
--- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~:~ ~~i l:g~~:
~ ~ ~ , ~~b ,;.~ ~1-~~
~ ~ a ,,:~:r:~~ "'if'~
~ i a ~ ~; ~ i~
o ~~
~
~
~
~
~
~ ~ 0 ~
~~~~-
- - ~
~:' c ~
~ i!: .::l
~ .
~
~~
\~
~~
-5
L_
,
J
... 'J: 00....... ~ P!JII' )o.iij
~
~
I
I
I
,,~ p'HeH; ~~ ~~ ~~
~~~"n"~ U~~{~
~difi~!~ ~ii~i~2~
1'" ~!i"'l:i! :g := ". :- l; ~ ~ ~
It a ~ ~ i s ~~
. .So ~ ~ll
". ~.. fJ ~
~ . . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~-~ I - ~ - - ,-
.""~~O~8S 0
.n _.::; ~ .i a ~ i ,.. -~ ""'~--i-
;:'it;:~~~ i: ii a
~ s e ~ g aa E~ ~
~ ,,~>. -!"~ ~
~ .!---'-' "~~.
'~-~-~'~~i'~~i ~
~ ~ ~~~dn ~d" ~
."~~~~~~. 'a. ~ ~
~ ~:~~::~ ~~!. < ~
~ ~s~~ ~ ~
~ jM.a "~ ~
~ ~~'~"H ~
Ai t ~~ ~
~ '! '! ~
~
'"
"
~
~
:;.
"
--..
--
--
!
~
~y ~ ~~f ~~ff t yf ~~ ~~
:;;i:.::: ~~..... ti.Lilt:l; ~ ~.::p;~:ij....~ ...<f~ ....i1;t:I..... ct<il: i
~~~~~~~~~~~~~=~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~ n~ ~ un ~~ ~i~ an~ U ~
~ nn \ PAlM BLUFF
~ .. .... ~ ,. ! W"JSN IS:: DEVELOPlJENT l. 1... C
~ Cli:ARWATER rLORIM 340a BOA CON STIl'Tl'
.
~ ;:::'I! POMPANO 8EACH E1..DRrDA :J300~
\l <D __Ill lR.ftt. 'IQoD'" ')ITF PLAN
~ ~"'I![M/llog.i[)Q'EI;
!F~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ;
~~mH :~~::::::: ::::::::::::: :::: ~
~ q~~~~~~~~~~~~~~q~~qqq~~~ ~
o
~ Hmmmmnmum~--_, ~
" I.....
-<~ .
..... ~,
-- ~.....
--
C-G-6"
-4/?~
'47'e./[>
1
IlJ!ll
I" t
II Ii!
l,ilf~
I
....-I
-- ,
--
---1:1'-;';
....~ j!I: ( ~
1> ",'" i ~
(' -
~.rr ." ~ u~' "
, . " , III
" I ,
" I ~I
/1', I I
~
/
,
:i
~~
~~
~'i
;~
9j
io
.-
x
OSc
(0 ( A
A\-"[
( 10
Ii'/IV )
_r_~~~~_~
.. ~ . '-' ..... ... - <:I
~'."."i
a..~ .
lUlU
iili~i -'
Jilll r
!H~~r
h~jlil'
l"',,~;;
I ~~.. ~
j .P~
~ 0
i 0
li~diii H Hi AI; If~::!
~::I iqi ./ hi ~. ;!
rill i if ii! a ~ tt
~.1 i.' ~. if' ~ '"
!ai! !.; :, I,; Po 1)
"pi' I h I; u. ii II
fl. ,~j !: !~! JI !;
H 'I'~! U " -!
l:! ; ,_ :1 lj I L ~ ~
il1 ~ ~ I~ &; ~ /1 "1 i
i j , f~ Ii i [. (I
S 1 iI I,! a ~
:',3! h. if! r; I:
j II tl r] ]
i li~' I; I
, it' i 0") !.-
i , "" !' ; oJ ,j ,: i --,
H H ll- Ii i ~; i~ H 1*
it ~ g~ f !l! f ri ill 1.1 ,.~~i
I i 2-j" 11' · E'" Iii - ~.
" 1 "' · I' I <, 'I (I',
i :. ~';f t I 14 'I j'if
; ; H 'i I; 1 ~, 11 ;jh
Iii; l~ 11 1 'j-!;; i:~;
. I " i .' 1 'f ~ll'
I ~ "I i 'i t -j ,~ ~l {~
~ i" ~i I ~ ji ~! ~ 1 ~ .l ,ii
; j it I !: : f II h.j
i i !; d f : · nU
- . ~ - i J ~ 0 , Ii",
! , .~ . ~, I I J '1'-
~ f ~-s: 'II; :I _~
: i:1 , ; I ~ - I i~;'
, , " I f ~ i .!Il
U!iii:; qjt
, ) ;1 ~ -', ;. ,
1.~.1!5 I fll
!i:!' i' !i-
j . .- 0 I " 0
, ~i I. i l. ~,
I fc 1 f 1 'l
q~ I ! I
" i" 1
!lll .i
:1 .l I
L i I
i!! -
[i ; .
;z. !ilIiEo 01 t
It. f f i ~
· ;; ! I
I " " !
. i, I <
I i I
! '
I
!
!
t
,
! '" ~ Ii:
0 ~ - ~
~ ~ .
Ia i:::'"
III '"
\'I n __
-l...IWU:Cl-
-~~
1! t~ ; Hii !; ; !{: I;
H l~ !l _IU ~. i ill ~I
.l'J l! i J'i I i _~.! ::r
-i J~ ~ d.~ i ~ bit
z. Ii I it-II ;: ~ ~l!
h I, I 0" f:.;.
!HJ< ; ;J;j · I i~1
. i" "" '. I ~ f ,I.
I! 2' f ~r - I, ,I.
1 l~' 1 ~i '1' ;f:
I ,'~ il 'i l _l,
f .- 1 ;. U i/
! II t I, ~ I ~ n. .
~ ~II iiI '5. ~ 1M.
1 ,l L" I J If :
: 1; :'i i i fi I
I I ~ .11 . ~ ~J I
I ! I :.~ ;' I; 1
~ I ~ :~i t i ~~ j
~ .; "I ' f I' !
t I' ~ '~. ! I ,~ i
-, ~!l .I! ;
I.! l, i, .
i!< : ~ Ii I
.
;
~
CLEARWATER FLORI DA
,-t IT! i I_A Y N.. ..;\5::<. X-l \1 [---::> INC.-
.'SHE DE:VELOPME.VT I...LC ~~~~I*m~.A.~nl.LJU;L r'lA.~
~(tfi Hr'.At"ON ",TfUIt'r iAnPloI,!iY(!l"lI.JJQ)!,j,l.:o>\
POkl5li\"O Bf.ACll !-'l.()mn" 33062 ~--......::::
::...~. ~
PAlM III un
T.AN DSC AP t PLAN
-.J
<1:
:z
<...!)
0:::
o
-.J
;f
--
C!)
--
Cc
C)
---
~
~~~~~'W~
SEP ft 9 2004
~
,
PLA.NNING & DeVELOPMENl
SERVICES
CITY OF CLEARWATER
0,
I,
, oen's Tree Service Inc.
I
P.O. Box 86
Ozona, FI.,
34660-0086
ORIGINAL
Tree inventory - Prepared for "Visne Uevelopment LLC., for property
located at Palm Bluff Street and Osceola Avenue
Site overview and tree canopy analysis
The su bJect plO pel ty IS apPlO"\.unatcly tvvo JCl cS sltUiHecl 011 a natural blufl and SlOpulg to
the shorelll1c of Clearwater Harbor 'I he sItes contams native tree specIes tYPical of the
bl" fF "'l1\'lronmr..,t thdl prr-'-f"'V 'sted cl"'''elop.,~,.,.,~t "f thl~ SIt", Tl~'" n ,t, \'''' "nd"'rsto~\'
~1""1I. 1.......1 !j '-"11.... "'.. ___ ......l\.J;. I;,. ....... ,.J1Il.....J.I..... V.... ..;t 1"...... .1....... .........l........ r;..~l.i W L...
vcgetatlon has been removed by the prevIous occupants and repldced with vanous non-
1m aSI vc C"\otlC plallt speCies Some of the Slllllbs have: the effect of Ii'" mg sc III ]Jtm es as
age and offshore wmd have combmed to produce appearances atypical of the speclcs
ThiS sHe also contam$ narUlahzed exotic trces that mOSt likely have col0111zed on [heir
own Natural blllfls are rare In the State of flonda and as such tlllS propcrty represents
both d valudble anJ umque te50Ulee A SICIle::. of wmdll1g lendces Udl11111dtmg at d ndlulal
spnng at the base of the bluff sets thIS property apart from many other properties locatcd
on the bluff In dddltlon, as Clearwater's development started along the bluff front1l1g
Cledl watel Hal bOl, thiS slte has hlstollcal slgl1lficance
The promment 5hade tree specle'i present mclude the lIve oak (Quercw vlrgmtana),
pignut hIckory (Carya g!abra) and the sweetbay magnoha (Magnolw vlrgmtana) The
IIvc oak tree 1<; common :':.ltt1l1g atop the bluffs rlngmg Cleaf\.Vatcr H81 bor and Us
sweeping serpentme b1 anches create the effect most Identlfiable wIth the bluffs There alc
COUl notable h ve uak tll:eS (01 glOUpS 0 f t1 ees) with 11Igh desthelic q uah tIes and ~LlHicIent
hcalth to warrant thell preservation on sIte "I hc pIgnut hICkory IS al~o common on the
bluff and IlS aeslhctlc appeal, oveJall charaClenstlcs and hmoncal a::,::,ocmtlOn With the
bluffs rlvdl the hve oak There are three pIgnut hlekones tree~ eXI<;l1l1g on 5Ite that
contnbtlte to the site ambIance and should be ]JIesel\'ed The Irvc oak 81ld hKlOly bees
are among the toughest trees relative to SurVi vmg constructlOn Impacts and should
survIve Ii proper tree preservdtlOl1 techmques are lmplemented dUring constructJOn The
swcctbay tnagnoha IS common on the lower slopes of the bluff where 5eepage creates a
mOIst envIronment and lush tloplCal conclltlOllS One sweetbay wIth dl811latlc f0ll11 e,-lsts
on tlllS property but IS recommended for removal 111 the II1ventory as It IS Judged to be
hazardous due to the presence of an enormous basal cavity
In add1tlOl1 tu the above lefelenced shade llee~ the site pos':.es~e~ n1dny fine pdlm bees
dnd shrub/accent tree species The native sabal palm (Saba! palmetto) IS scattered
throughout the 51te and several unusually tall speclmcns are recommended for
preservation and noted on the II1ventory The site IS laden With accent tree, shrub and
groundeover plants that possess olltstdndll1g aesthetlC appeal because of theIr age and
ORIGINAL
appearance and should also be consIdered CO! preservatlon Exul1c trees 5uch as the
bwzIiJan pepper tree (Schmus tel e/Jlnlhr/olLU'>) and camphor !lee (Cmnamomum
t-amphonl) dl e downgl adcd dnd lec,oll1I11l:ndcd f,,)1 lemovdJ, a5 the Stolte::, LXOtlL PLSt
Pldnt Cuuncll II <;ts them d~ category # I ecological pe::,ts The natJve cherry Id.urel tree
IJ', unu.s em olin/ana) IS gro\vmg 111 abundance along tJ1C 50mh and eaSi propclt) ime and
although comldered weedy by some pla.nt profe55lonah It IS recommcnded for retentIOn
on thl s sHe lor I L 5 ':>Lreel1lng pi 0 pertl e"
Tree Il1ventory Data
The tie~ i!1veJ1tOl} ploYldes a "snap::.hoL" of the jJlOpell) and estabhshes a hlelmchy of
eXIstIng tree" to assIst the Site desIgner 111 the process of choosmg trces to be Incorporated
Into the sJte de51gn The 1I1'ventory mcludes the followmg mtonnatlOn
I) CI I cc locatIOn - bach Llee IS Il~ted by a llUmbel thdt cunespond-, to Lhe ~,U11C
number physlcally located on the ::'Ite plan mdlcat111g the locatIon ofthe tree 111 the
field
2) Tree sIZe expressed as dIameter at breast height (DBH - the trunk dIameter
mcasured at 4 5' above grade) If there ]S a fork at 4 ')', thc mea5urement It taken
at the narrowest pomt belov'i the fork
3) CI rec species are shown by both common and bolal1lLd] name::, the first tune they
are h::,ted 111 the mventory and only by eommon ndmes thcreafter
4) The trcc!> overall value rating ranks the cree on Q sWle of 0-6 (holf II1cremems are
used to mcrease aecuracy) ba<;ed on Its overall hedlth (condItion) Factors such a5
Lhe 5iLe, 5pecle::' and appearance are abo consIdered
5) The crown spread for all shdcle !~ee spec'e5 IS sl1o"'n d5 c!]sta...'1ce and duectlOD
from the trunk (the crown spread IS only shown wIthm the property hoe5)
6) The comment section plovldes cOI11J1lental,)' dlSClISSl11g ::opecIfic pomts both
posItive and negative of the subJect tree
Below IS an explanauon of the mung <>yslem for the overall condlllon of the cXlsung
trees It ::,hould be noted that the trees eXlstmg on thIs SIte reflect gencra! neglect and
sevelal of the tree::, wtll benet1.t [10111 plOpel plUl1mg and COLlld be subsequently
upgrdded In addItIOn many of the tree5 wIll benefit (rom addltlond.1 tree care
measures such as fertllIzalion, cablmg dnd bracmg etc It IS further recommended that
all 1 emedIal work performed on the trees Pleserved at this slte bc pel fOl med by 01
under the duectton of an InternatIOnal SOCiety of Arbonculture USA) CertIfied
SEP ? 9 2004
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Ratmg System
ORtG1NAL
o ~ A dead tree
1 - 'Crees Ulal are d)1l1g, sCVClel) aecll11l11g 01 haz~l1ctou~ JJ1d trees aesIgnated by {he
';tate of Flonda's Exotic Pest Plam CouncIl as a category #J ecologIcal pest, Ie,
Bl8Z1lJ,m peppel tIce A tIee wlth a #11ctt111g should be lemovcd Note. The camphol
tree 15 8 category #1 ecologIcal pest but provides valuable screel1lng along the north
prOperlY lIne \vhere It lneanders on and off the property f'rhe developer ha~ Indicated
a desire to preserve the camphor trce<, 5,0 tlley have been rated In regards to their
heal tl1 and Stl UCtUl e and not then 111\ aSI \,C cl1J.l actell "t]CS
:2 - Trees cXlllbnmg senous 5uucmral defecls SUCh as co-dom1l1om stems wnl1
mducled bark, large cavIties, crown dleback, cracked/spllt branches et<., Trees wIth
health IS~lle5 ~uch a~ low eneIgy, tow hve clown latl0, selIOUS dlsed~e uJ m~t,d
problems, nutntIOnal deficIencIes or pH related problems A tree WIth a #2 ratll1g
sho ul d be removed un I e:; s the pro b I ems' wIll be ml tl gated
3 - 'I ree5 that have good overall structure and systemIc health WIth problems that can
be corrected WIth moderate mamtenance A tree WIth a #3 ratmg has an average
appearance, (,fown denslty and hvc crown raHo A tree wlth a #3 ratmg ShOUld be
plesel ved If pOSSIble
4 - hees WIth gOud 5tIudUlt- dnd ~y~temlc health WIth plOblems that Lan ea~Ily be
corrected With mll10r mamtenance Trees should exhibIt good form With abovc
avelage crown denslt) Mature crees cxhitmll1g scars, old wound<" smail cavities 01
other problems that are not deblhtatmg can be lI1c\ucled In thl5 group particularly If
they possess. llmqLle fOlln 01 othel aesthetIc ame11111es relatmg to then age T1ees wIth
a #4 ratmg should be preserved and warrant SIte plan modificatIon for preservatlOn
5- Trees With hIgh lIve crovm ratIO. e'(ceptlOna! structure and sy<:,lemlC health good
form and free from any senou,> dIsease, lI1sect problem or nutntJOnal deficiency A
tiee 111 tl115 categOly should have a balanced CI\Twl1 wIth e"cepttonal aestJletJc
qualities Trees wlth a #5 ratmg lend conSiderable value to the SltC and should be
Il1corpormed II1tO the sne deSign Trees wIll1 a #5 ratlng are worthy of sIgmficam SHe
plan modificatIOns to ensure thelT prcservation
6- ~peumcn Uee - A ~peC1l11en tJec l,s a tJ ee that pos.se,>~e~ a cOmbll1dtlOl1 of .':.UpCllOI
quahtlcs relatmg to Slze, speCIe, form, umqueness, structure, systemle health and
crown densIty A specimen tree must be preserved and II1LOrporated ml0 a SIte design
With an undlsturbed area equal to the bee's dllplmc (branch spread as proJected
vertleally to the ground) -----
'I~E:p:'~\~o~1'D '\
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES
CITY OF CLEARWATER
ORIGINAL
Tree inventory
Tree# Size
Specie
Ratmg
crown spread
[-
10" DBH PIndo Palm (Butta capllala)
2.0
N/A
C0B11iklitS ThIS tlee has low aesthetlc value due to d small ClOwn and lC~111cted meflS
on the trunk The palm also has mInor nutntlOnal dellclencles
') -
1 '1.' nBw Qqh,:,] po;;lm ((:"1,,,,' n{lf,,,,oIU'\
........ L..r ....1. IoJ \..l V""""" I a.L. \'"-llAv......"'....l./!I,. 1,1o..--..V)
35
l\J! A
Comments 'lJllS tlee IS located on the falm Bluff light of way and 15 healthy willi the
exceptIOn of I11mor wounds on the trunk
3-
15' DBH Sabal Palm
30
N/A
Comment~ ThIs tree IS located on the Palm Bluff nght of way and IS dn average tree
with small trunk wounds at the base
4- 24",21" DSH Sweetbay (Magnolza vlrgmwna) 3.0
20'N, 20'S, l5'E, 22'W
Comments This tlee IS co-dommant at the base that can lead to structural failure, It
has a small basal cavity and mll10r decay on the central leader Tt has a picturesque
form with average crown density Preserve If possible and comlder cablIng and
bracmg tOl the co-dommant
5- 13" DBH Sabal Palm
3.0
N/A
Comments ThiS palm has an average crown WIth VlI1CS on the trunk Adpcem oak
and sweetbay are caU<;lng overstory restnctlOlls for growmg space
6 - IJ DBB Chme:"e Fan Palm (Ln'lslOna c,hmemis) 4.0
1\I/A
Comments ThlS tree ha~ a verv attrac.tive and healthy CfO\Vn Remove VInes There lS
some overstory eOmpetltlOn from adJacent sweet bay tree
7- IS" DBH Sabal Palm 2.0 _ N/i\
I [---~ rs ~ p n ~-r~-r=-'-
Commcms ThIS 11 ee's crown IS ruOOlllg .1g::Ul1St me scaffol<1l Bohg (ilVI1~dJa~en1::J I r--
sweetbay tree Recommend removal of tills palm lrO s: 2: 2:04~ i LJ /1
I~I
PLANNING & OEVELOPMENl I
SERVICES
CITY OF CLEc\RWATfR
ORIGINAL
8- 13" DBH Saba! Palm
2.5
N/A
Comments rhl::' lJee has a strangler fig on the trunk thdt w1l1 eventually kill the palm
If the fig is lemoved the palm wJiI be upgraded to a 3 0 "I hele 15 some ovclhead
competl tlOO 110m an adJacent oak tree
9- 36" LIve Oak (Quercus vlrglnwna)
50 23'N, 20'S, 30'E, 28'W
COll1menb Uus tlee hds a ::'l11all ba'>dll.dVIly Lln the we~t ~Ide amltl1c ,>outhem 1110::.[
scaffold branch IS 30% deca}ed Ho\\ever, thlS branch has been previously cabled
T11t: LJOle should be re-lI1swlled pCI CUllent ISA "tandinds 1he raIlage IlaS gOOd SIZC
and color and the tree has average crown denSIty ThI5 tree ha" dramoltlc aesthetic
appc81 due te. the llIHlsUal selventule (e veti fOl <, live oak) l1dtwe of the DJittlCh
structure ThiS tree IS enhanced by the presence of a natural sprmg and the effect of
th'" br ~11'- h ..-l, p"'-lnu Into th'" <,nr' n" and "'o,pr"'n" ~(Ja]n 1 S n,.." ,']r'",s T, t..IS "'''''''P <;h"lllrl be
Ll........ l........ '-.1 UL ,tJ _oc ..... ........1-' ..L.l bb ~ ...... .l.L"-'J..e1 c.......b l~..L. L......................L.J 1], ""................ ........!...l..V !.........
Pleserved at all costs and would benefit II00n some cabhng and proper prumng
10- 27- DBI-I Sweetbay
15 N, JS'S, 12'E, 16 W
3.5
Comment') T!1lS tree has mmor decay ell the base "(he co-dommant 111 the lowel
trunk hd5 a wldc-angle crotch With a branch bark ndge eXIsting through the erotch
The crown l':i healthy
11- 5"5" DBH Llgustrum (Llgustrum japomcum) 3 5
NIA
Comment:. ThlS tree ha:> high aesthetic appeal and WIll Improve once adJacent
oleander IS removed
12- 36" DBH Sweetbay
1.0
14'N, 12'S, 10'E, 15'W
Commenb 1 hiS h ee hd~ a beaull[ul L.JOwn WIth vel Y l11gh desthetlC, appeal
However, thlS tree has a 16" wide caVIty at the base on the east side and the trunk IS
80% hollow Tills tree IS hazardous dnd should be removed
l J - J 6 Pignut I-hckory (Ca; ya gLabl a)
4.0 22 N 30 S, 21'E, 12 W
Comments ThiS tree has :;ood structure hO\vever It has mmor d1e back in the upper
crown, mll10r basal decay on the e<i'>t sIde probably due to a tree that once grew there
and a metal pipe embedded In tile trunk
14- 38" DBH LIVe Oak
30 32'N, 32'S, 21 'E, 20'W
Commenh lIus uee ha~ an undeldcvdoped clown With some d1ecdY, d{tP:WH~Y,ed~ ~n ~
stubs In the upper portIOn 1hcre IS a small cavity on the 50uthl SfO'e\<Wlm cppcrete \ r
~I l':::::J\~CJ ~
filler but thIS will not compromise the tree Needs to be pruned 1-..1
SEP 2 9 2004
PLANNING & D[VElOPMENT
SERVICES
CITY OF CLEARWATER
15- I)' DBH Sabal Palm
3.5
nq!GI~JA,L
N/A
Comments ThlS palm IS growing trom base of adJacent Live Odk but IS :.fl/I
compatIble Thele will be ovelstolY competJtlOn III the futmc flom oak to the west,
tree # 16
16- 50" DBH Live Oak
2.5 ] 8'N, 38'S, 48 E, IO'W
Co l11mentS ThIS bee bas a healthy SystemiC system although It 11'15 " (.a, It)' on the:
east side (Side of the lean) measunng 3 Yz' wIde at base and taper,> to a pomt 7' above
the grdde The core of heartwood ]s present and hdrd however the ledn on thIs tree
has sIgnificantly reduced the phY51cdl support "[ he former central leader broke off
leavltlg a lfuge ~vol1lid Thls llee has hIgh aesthetIc appeal, howcvcl pieSel"Vl!1g thIS
tree creates a nsk due to the trunk decay If the tree IS prc<;erved, proposed houses
should be located out ot the target range area ::.hould thIs tree tall
17- 12" DBH Sabal Palm
2.5
N/A
Comments This palm has overhead compctltlOn Wlil be rated a 3 If #6 IS removed
18- 13' DBH SabaI Palm
2.5
N/A
Comments This tree has overhead competltlon Wlil be a 3 1f#16 IS removed
19- 8" DBH Queen Palm (Syagru.s romanzoffiana) 3.0 N/A
Comments This palm has competition from #6, which \\lIllImpact 111 future
20- 5' DBH SchemeIa lScheJJlcla QCllnophylla)
2.0
N/A
Comments ThIs tree lS d cold sensitIve weak ,,','ooded p!dnt WIth an extensIve root
system However It has aesthetlc appeal and lS healthy and can be preserved It
de<;Jrcd
21- 12"' DBH Sabal Pdlm
3.5
N/A
Comments Healthy young palm
22- 9" DBI-I Queen Pdlm
4.0
N/A
Comments Good palm
23- Schefflera
2.0
Comments <;ee comments for tree #20
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES
CITY OF Ct_Er\RWATER
24- Schefflera
2.0
N/A
OR\G\NAL
Comments see comments [01 ltee #2U
25- 13" DBH Sabal Palm
3.0
l'-Ji "',
COl1il1knts ThIs tlee IS plCtll1esque With Its ClOwll sllhOlletted aga1l1st the sly <wc1 the
bay as a backdrop
26- 36" DBH Pignut HIckory
4.0
27'N, 21'S, 33'E, 20 W
Cornmt':l1b I h]~ tJ C~ has V~l y gl)od Stl UUUI e dnd I~ p~ll_h~d dtop the bluU 1 he tJ ~e
has I05t 3 large laterdl brdnche5:. that will result 111 decay, however It WIll not
slgl1lficantly debilItate the structural mtcgnty -I his !lee should be prc5erved
H*** The trunks of scvetal of the followll1g tree,> dppear to be on the ddJdc,cnt
property Just north of the north property Ime They wlil be noted d~ AP (adJacent
property) m the comments section 'I hey are reqUired to be II1ventoned by the City d5:.
their root system extends mto the subJect ptopt:tiy dnJ may be Impacted by the
plopo~ed development tven though they l11dY be off Ihe plOperty line they olTer
benefits such as SCIeemng ******
27- 13" DBH Sabal Palm
30
N/A
Comments AP~ ThIS tl ec has a I estltcted tnmk at bud
28- 7"X'"8" OBH P1ttosporum (P!fto~porum lob/ro) 3 0 N/A
Comments AP- clllls tlee has some cllcbach. dnd a thll1l11ng ClOw11 but has an
InterestIng form and provIdes screel1l ng
29- 13" DI3H Sabal Palm
4.0
N/A
Comments 1 hIS llee I:'. a tall palm wIth alll11telestmg cloak m tJ unk Recommended
for prcscrvahon
30- Senegal Date Palm cluster (Phoenix reclmala) 3.5
N/A
Comment,; AP- With care thiS palm cluster Gould provIde screemng and a :'.tnkmg __
aesthetIc amel11tv - -~ ----
31- 13" DBH p:ndO Palm 3.0 Nt A I! ~ z
1l[lJ] ~ ffi
"'=T 0.. l-
~ ~ SCf)~
== !:U UJ a::
0') LUU'1.:
0d1D1 N 05::;
QJJd]~~ I fb ~ ~ ~
CI) z r:
z -
~ 5 u
'LQb ~
Comments ThIS tree IS an average palm but provIdes some screemng
32- 15" DBH Sabdl Palm
4.0
N/A
Comments AP- Nice palm
ORIGINAL
33- 14" DBH ~abal Palm
N/,d,
40
Comment::, AP- NIce palm
34- 13" DBH Sabdl Pdlm
3.0
N/A
Comment:'.: AP- ThiS palm ha"i no clear trunk yet but has scrcel1lng value
35- 13" DBH Queen Palm
N/A
4.0
Comments AP- Good crown
36- 5" DBH VIburnum (VIburnum odorallJSlmum) 3.0 N/A
Comments AP- Under-developed erown but has screcmng value
37 - 36" DBJ-l Laurel Oak (Quercu.s launjolla) 1.5 20'N, I8'S, 39'E, 9'W
Commelll"i Thl'> l1<:.e has open Cd'dtles 10' up lhe llUllk on the llottll\vest Side and
conSIderable dleback 111 the crown Recommend removal
**** * A,Jl camphor and BrazIban pepper lrees are on the ~tate'" category one 11st for
II1vaSlve exotic plants and consequently are recommended for removal However, as
the cam]JhOl ttees proVide an abundance of SCleenlng along tbe HOith jJ10pE:lly 11lle
and are not as notonous as the pepper tree, the developer may Wish to retam them on
site InvaSive eXOtlC Uee<; \vIII be noted III the comments seCllon as IE (mvasJ\'e
exo bc) hereafter ** * * *
38- 17" DB1-1 Camphor (Cmnamomum wmphora)
2.5 I8'S, l5'E, 15'W
Commcnts: JE- I hl"i tree 1<; on the property lmc and hds golden pothos vmes growmg on
trunk and mto the canopy
39- 11" DBH Washll1gton palm (Washmgtonta rOhU'ila) 3.5
N/A
~
,'0
[1&[J )
~
=
Comments Extends over both properties on the north sIele and makes a good butfen !1J1JJ I
IS'S, 2'W, 5 E <f~
0d1[J
,(O~
Comments Good palm - try to preserve
40 Areca palm cluster (Chrysalidocarpus lutescen~)
3.0
N/A
41- 26' DEE Camphor
2S
~
C1)
N
c....
LU
(,I)
I-
Z
W
:::;;:
Q.
o
ujU)
>w
wO
05
~II
w
(.9U)
~
z
z
5
0...
1,\0
N/A
I,: \1DJ1 \
\~
\ r-==
51- 8' DBH Queen Palm 3.5 N/A \ t111D \
\ (( 51 t
Comment~ PaJm5 #51, ;:;.52, #53 ale good palms and would make an attIactIve st~ndl~Jn
\ IldlJ _
~--/-::::U
\ (-,,--
L_j~
_ 4 _ ~ ________
ORIGINAL
Comlnenls IE- 1 hlS tree hdS lnl~ur dleback tn the upper cro'~,/n and the trup.u1.c IS lovered
by golden potho<; (Eplpremnum aureum) Vll1C Trcc IS provldmg screemng
42- 17',16' DBH twm camphor Uee"
2.0
30'S,25 W 20'[0,
Commel1Is IE- ThiS tree n.lS brge dc-adwood 111 tJ1e upper Clown tl1at Could be 1 emoved
and IS CO-c10lTIlOant with 1I1cluded bark 2' above grade Golden pothos v1l1e on trunk
43- 9',9",9 " 10" DBH Camphor
2.0
25'S, O'W, 38'E
Comments I E- I hiS tree ha:. Lo-dom111ant 'items with ml nOl dleback, d rubbll1g bwnch
and golden potho'i V111e on the trunk Plovlde~ sCIeemng flam adjacent property Could
be pre~ervcd or removed
44- II", 14" DBH Camphor
2.0
15 S,20'E
Comments IE-See comments for tree #43
45- 16', I I ' DBH Camphor
2.0
20'S
Comments: iE-See comments fen tIee #43
46- 1 T DBH Ca..'11phor
2.0
22''3
'1" '"I: l.::;'\At
_..J ..............L..... rT
Comments IlL-See COllUllents 1"01 Uee #43
47- 8" OBI-! Queen Palm
30
N/A
Comments Average palm, has pltS on trunk
48- 10" DBH Queen Palm
2.5
N/A
Comments Below average palm
49- 8" DBH Queen Palm
2.5
N/A
Comments Below average palm
50- 12" DBH Queen Palm
3.5
Comment5 Good palm
""""
Cj
~
0">
N
n..
L!J
f../)
I-
Z
W c:
:::i W
(1- 1,;(
o .....
uj[j)&;
_ w ~
? O'~
lli _ uJ
0""";>...)
06ffio
<..')(/)u-
Z 0
Z ~
z -
5 0
(1-
[\~~~~~~~~ I[))\
52 8 ' DBH Queen PlliJ lr\~N:: &2D~V:PME~ \
\ SERviCES
Comments See eomments for treedfD'11 OF ClE,\RWATER
1-
ORIGINAL
N/A
51- 9' DBH Queen Palm
3.5
N/A
Comments See comment,> for tree #51
54- 22" Om-I Camphor
1.0
10'N, 21'S, 18'E,20'W
Comments lE- Thl::' tree has a cavity at the base and <;hould be removed
55- 13" DBH Sabal Palm
4.0
N/A
Commenls Good palm
56- 11' DBH Queen Palm
.., ~
_.:l
N/A
Comments ThIs palm has d le::,tncted trunk and over5tOfy competition
57 - IS" DBH Laurel Oak
2.5
17 N, 20'S, 14'W, 16'E
Commcm<; This tree has a poorly developed crown and 15 dnached at root flare to tree
#58 Recommend removal
58- lY DBH Laurel Oak
2.5
18'N, 15 S, 10'E, 16'W
Comment~ ThIs tree has a poorly developed crown and IS attached at root Hare to tree
#57 Recommend removal
59- 2- Sabal Palms
N/A
N/A
Commenb One palm has g' of dedi trunk and the otht;;;l 1 01 dedi trunk I hey me not
protected by ordmance so they l,an be transplanted, protectE-d or removed
60- 12" DBHHong Kong Orchid (Bauhmw biakmna) 2.5
lS"N, 12'S, 10',#, lS'E
CGmments Cold sen.sltlVC e>..otlc that Dowers Could be pleserved for ae<;thetlc appeal
61- 30' DEB Lrve Oak
3S
40'N, 24'S, 20'~ 30'\\1
Comments TlllS bee has a young spll:admg CIO\Nll vdth good S!lUctlllC thdt wtll evoI-ve
1I1to an appeahng tree Necds remedial prunmg
62~ 6" DBH Hong Kong OrchId
1.5
N/A
ORIGINAL
Comments ThIS tree has an under developed (,J own with pOOl stlUclure and IS undeI tree
#61 Recommend rcmoval
63- 6" DBH Hong Kong Orchid
1.5
N/A
Comments See comments for tree #62
64- 11" DBH Queen Palm
25
N/A
Comment~ This palm I':. competll1g wIth more valuable tree #61 Could remove
65- 10" OBH Queen Palm
2.5
N/A
Commenl~ Tlll~ palm has numelOUS pas on II unk, but ha~ a I1Ice CroW11
66- 10" DBH Queen Palm
" .::
-.-'
N/A
COliunelllS TIllS palm has sealS on the trunk and IS eOl11~etlllg with mOle valuable oak
Recommend rcmoval
67- 5" OBI-I Camphor
N/A
1 0
Commcnts IE-ThIs tree has poor structure Recommend removal
68- 6" DBH Camphor
10
N/A
Commcnts IE-Tree has poor structure, recommend removal
69- 11" OBH Queen Palm
2.0
N/A
Comments ThiS palm has decay and restnctlon 111 the trunk but has a I1lce crown
70- 12" DBH Queen Palm
20
N/A
Comments ThIS palm has decay and pitS on 11 unk and could be lemo'ved
71- l2' DBB Queen Palm
30
N/A
Comments ThIS palm has mll10r pitS but a I1lce crown
72- Llgustrum
N/A
20
It r5J
I
I n.JLn I
I~
r=
I [J11JJ
Ig
[ Lfl-.1]
r:-v?
'.O~
<::::t
c::>
~
Cl>
N
CL
L!.J
V)
I-
Z
W cr
~ w
a.. t-
o <:(
....J(/)~
!:Uwcr
"'0'1:
W_w
O>....J
~a:o
Cj~LL
z 0
z r:
z -
5 0
a..
Commcnts ThiS IS a multI-stem tree that has potentIal If adJacent bushe~ are removcd
73- 10' DBH Laurel Oak
2.5
10'N, IS'S, 12'E 12'W
ORIGINAL
Comments Thl<; tree has poor structure but provIdes sGrccnmg from adJacent propeJty
Keep for thl <; purpo<;c otherwise recommend for I emoval
74- 13" DBH Sabal Pdhn
40
N/A
Comments 1 his IS a healthy palm desplte the presence afnalis H1 trunk
75- 1 T' DBH Chll1ese Fan Pdlm
4.0
N/A
CammenL~ AP- TIlls palm has J' at clem Hunk and 1:' a 11e.illllY specimen
76- 4" DBH Cherry LdL'rel
20
1'.1/,11..
COlnments This tlee has all wlderde-\ eloped CIOwll with pe,Ol stlLlctule Mid a co-
dommant stem Does provIde screemng on property Ime Keep for this purpose or
rcmovc
77- 10",6',5" DBH Camphor
2.0
18'S, 8'E, 10 W
Comments IE- ThIs tree has poor structure and has sOllie decay at the base Recommend
removal
78- 12' DBH Sabal Palm
N/A
N/A
Comments This palm has only 3' of cleaI hunk but pIovldes screel1lng on the property
hne
79- 7",8" DBI-J Southern Red Cedar (Jumperu.s .stllc/coia) 2.5
IS'S, 12'W, 2'E
Commems TIllS tree 11as a (,Q-dOmm:1m 5Iem III tl1e lower nunk \\lIh lllCIUdCd bark The
crown IS sparse with deadwood Needs remedml prunmg PrOVides serccl1mg along
property lmc
80- 12" OBl-! 'Southern Red Cedar
3.0
22'S, JO'W, 2'E
Comments ThIS tree has a spalse ClOW(l yet 1:1l0"Vldes scree11111g 011 PlOPetty 1111e Needs
to be pruned
81- 7" DBH Southem Red Cedar
2.5
IS'S, lO'W, 2'1'1 q
I fUJJJ I
1- ""'=T
I~ ~
I ---
IS'S 10'W 5'E~--' en
, 'iLl-D-DI N
ii' ~~ L lli
...~- -- V :=::J
~-'1, ~
~I -.J
4 :~___ ~
Comments see comments for tree #80
82- 11" DBH Southcm Red Cedar
3.0
Comments see comments for tree #80
1-
Z
W a:
::2. W
Q_ f-
a <i
-..l 5:
!,UfBa:
U;~~
O>.-l
0ccU
LJj lJ...
'-'(/)0
Z
Z ~
z -
:5 U
a.
ORIGINAL
83- 10" DRH Queen Palm
3,5
N/A
Comments ThIs IS a very ta\1 palm locdted on thc property line that has aesthetIC value
84- 6" DBH Laurel Oak
IO'S, ll-W, O'E
I.:'
Comments This tl cc has pOOl sti UClLUe ReC0l111lle1ld lemovnl w11c3s lised as sCleerllng
on property line
35- 2" DDH Laurel Odk
IO'S
'::;'\AT n'r.:
.... ".... V ...L...J
1.5
Comments see comment,> [0) [1 cc #84
l56- 36" DBH Pignut l-hckory
32'S, 30 W, 30 t,
4.5
Commcnb 11m, lIce has good ::.tlUl-lule oll1d need5 only 1111111)1 plunmg ~hltt hl)u~(; to
protcct root system Recommcnd preservatIOn
87- 9" DBH Cherry Laurel
15'S, 6'W, 10 E
1.5
Comments ThiS tree has poor structure with a co-dolTImant stem 5 abovc grade and IS
also growmg under trcc #86 Should be removed for hickory',> benelit
88- 5" DBH Laurel Oak
1.0
N/A
Co mmcl1 ts 1 hI5 tl ee ha5 a vel Y pOOl CIO WI1 wIth weak 5tl uctUI ~ and a co-J0l11111dnt stem
Should be removed fOl Hickory's benefit
89- 20' DBH Laurel Oak
25'S, 10'E
2.0
Comments -lhlS liee has a CO-dOl1l1l1dnt stem at base With a potent,al fOl falItue The
uppcr crown has good structure and sprcads over the stl eet Could be preserved I r ('dble
,md brace~ :lfe mstaHed
90- 6'> DBB Laurel Oak
1.0
l5'SW
Comments I hiS tfee has a very poor and undeldeveJoped crown Recommend removal
91- 9" DBH Queen Palm
N/A
-
:(( 51
1 J
!111L1
C:::::..::
~
=
illW
((:j)
G-11D
r---v .- ]
,or
-- --~
3.0
Comments A very tall palm 111 average eondltlOn
92- 4",4' DBH Rrazlhan Pepper (Schmu'J terebmthifnllUs) 1.0
N/A
C3
~
0')
N
0-
W
V)
Comments IE- Recommend removal
f-
Z
~ ffi
Q f-
a <::
....JUJ$
~WII
'>0"-':
U_uJ
O>....J
e.6O::U
llJL..l..
~UJo
Z i::
z -
:S u
a...
ORIGINAL
93- 28' DBH Red Bay (l'er.sea burboma)
1.0
12'S, 12'W
Comments 5 stems growmg trom rotted stump It 1<) velY unu<)ual yet should be removed
94- 6 OI3I-1 Chen) LaUlel
2.0
.5 N, 5'S, 5'W
Comments Thl::. tree IS growmg over the nght of way CJn be presel\'ed for scrcerlng on
property hne
95- .5' OI3I-j Red Bay
25
N/A
Comment5 ThiS tree IS growlI1g over nght ot way Can be preserved for scrcemng
96- 6' DBH Red CedaJ
2.5
N/A
Comments 'I hIS tree has a sparse crown Provldes some screemng on property Ime
97- 18' DBH Sabal Pdlm
4.0
N/A
Comment<; Healthy palm that needs pmmng
98- 15" DSH Laurel Oak
2.5
15'N, 8'S, lO'E, 12'W
Commems ThIS tree needs some prunmg W lemove deJ.dwOOd and stubS COUJCj be
pre::.erved for sereenmg along property Imc
99- BraLlhan Pepper stanl!
1.0
N/A
Comments IE- Recommend removal
100- 9 , 7',4 ,2' DI3H Red Cedal
2.5
l~ N, O'S, 15 W
Comments ThiS tree lS a multI-stem one-slded tree It IS cracKlI1g me rewll1l11g \\all but
has screemng vdlue
101- 10", 1 0" DBH Red Cedar
3.0
18'N, 12'S, 22'W
COlTlments ThIS tree has a burlm the lower trunk and needs some pruning Has <;ereemng..-
value ~
102- 10" DBH Queen Palm 1.5 N/A !l0
\111J]
Comments TillS palm has senous damage on the trunk Recommend removdl . '~':'~ \ !
103~ 21"DBH Laurel Oak 2.5 l3'N,20'S,25~~jtD ~ ~
I ,1 ~ ~
l'-J}
, ,'-.::::]
, (
~ ~ --:=J
I-
Z
UJ a:
:20 ~
n.. '"
o --.
LdUlfi
>w.-(
wS:2uJ
o>~
<<:Jffio
~Ulu..
~ 0
z ~
Z <3
:5
0.
~----
112- 8" DBH Sabal Palm 4.0 N/ A
Comments 11m palm I; ;hucturally ,",und WIth ;c.,; on hunk and ;ome Vl"';';;;~
trunk This palm should be preserved IfPOS51ble 11 _
N/A \ OJl,---n I
~
c---
=
: [1:ILi] 1
i ~() -~ l tg
I, ,I-XU]
- <' ..=:j
....
ORIGINAL
Comments This Iree hal) poor strUC[Ule wlIh co-oommam siems Tl1ele IS some aecay on
leader to the east and It also has a large branch graft There are heavy vmes present and
~tllb.', Propel prW1l1lg can Improve overdll condltlOn ProvIdes screenmg on plopen)' lme
104- Brazlbn Pepper duster
1 0
l\J/A
Comments IE- Recommend remO\,al
\ 05- Brazllltan pepper cluster
N/A
1.0
Comment.':> n.:- Recommend removal
106- 4" DBH CItruS (Caru,', ~pp)
1 0
N/A.
Commcnts Rccommcnd rcmoval
107- 7" DBH Cherry Laurel
1 O'N, 8'S, 1 Q'W
2.5
Comments Provides screemng on property lmc
t08- Brazilian pepper cluster
N/A
1.0
Comments IE. Recommend temoval
109- 8" DB H Laure! Odk
N/l\
2.0
Comments Tlus nee has an undeldeveloped crown and IS 111 an O\lEiCIOVvdcd condltion
Could be removed or saved for scrCCl1mg value
110- 4" DBH Cherry laurel
N/A
1.0
Comments Recommend removal
i 11- 12" DBH Sabal Palm
3.0
N/A
Comments Palm has some vmes that .':>hould be removed
113- 10" DBH Sabal Palm
3.0
Comments ThiS palm has some \lmes that should be removed
;3
Ea
CJ')
N
-~
l-
Z
W 0:
2. w
Q j-
o <(
....l<J)~
~wS
wS2U'J
0>-1
<>CIffiu
C') <J) LL
Z 0
Z ~
z -
5 u
0...
--~ --- -
.. -.
(-~"\
lL~1
10'N 8'S 15'W - ~-.--1
, I1fllJ
~
~
Wi
~~:~~n:B:h:c:e:~: covered with vme, but mth ;::mng could be save:1 ~ ~ I
N/A:~
ORIGINAL
114~ ! 3" DBH Saba! Palm
30
1\J/ A,
Comments -rh15 palm ha~ ~car5 on Il~ trunk bUL 1~ structuldl1y ~ound
115- 13" DBH Sabal Palm
3.5
N/A
Comment') rhlS palm has some V1l1e5 111 the canopv thai should be removed
I 16 - 9" DBH Live Oak
2.5
Comment5 ThJ<'; tree ha') an undeldeveloped canopy with hcavv vines
I 18- Brazilian Peppcr cluster
1 0
Comments IE- Recommend lcmoval
119- 32" DBH Laurel Oak
1.0
NIl\.
COl1llm:nts ThIs tlee has a hollow cavity Il1 the tam\... and 1l13JOl dleback 111l1PI)(.~1 ClOWn
It IS hazardous and should be removed Check with the Cny to deterrnme j[the tree IS on
the nght of way and If so, will they remove It
120- 9" DBH Wa5hmgton Palm
3.5
N/A
Comments This IS a tall graceful palm, but IS touchmg wires Progress Energy could
place a wlap on the hunk
121- 6"]) BH Citrus
1.0
5'N, 5'S, 5 E 5'W
Comments 'I hiS Citrus IS dIseased and should be removed
122- 6" 0 Bf-! Citrus
2.5
8'N, 5'S, 8'E, 8'W
Comments -I hl<; tree has some dleback but could be pruned, tertlllzcd and preserved
123- 15" DBB Pll1do Palm
,., a
"".-'
N/A
Comments ThiS palm 15 dttractlve but has some decay at the bd5e dod l~ growIng under
utlilty wires that It IS about to touch Should be removed
124- Cherry Laurel hedge
No daLd nece5sary - see comment5
B
~
0)
'"
8J
en
J-
Z
UJ cr
~ W
Q. '--
o <l:;
dVJs
;:.UJa:
l.1.l () -~
05::;
",,0:0
<.'.lUlu..
2(1)0
7- i':
2 _
.5 0
a..
ORIGINAL
Comments Young Chen y laurel u ees TOI m an al n1051 un 01 OKen Iledge along me souUl
property line Because they <lie growlI1g very close togethcl, lI1dlVlducl!s wltlun the stand
hd ve little value Although the pllll1mg pI l)CiCdul t- 0 r loppmg I~ neveI 1 eCl)Il1Il1~nd~d fVI
shade trees, the cherry laurel IS more of an accent tree and lends It~elf to hedging _Thls,::,,:--
stand wIiI provide good screel1lng amenities along Palm 81uffStleet If hedged ;' r--, '\
~
N/A [1[Ln I
"""'"
~ ~
Commcnts Average palm
.-
z
u.J a:
~ 1..J
D- /"--
9 ~
u.J(j):S
>u.J~
= 0> w<;2w
n nJ f'J' N L > -..J
N/A ~ <(l a: ()
g ~ ~~t)
nnn ~ ~
~ :5 ()
127- 12" DBH Sabal Palm 4.0 N/~ ro-r a: :
Comments The crook at the top gIves thIS Pd'm very ~ood .lesthetIc appea: ;!h9.~
a good candidate tor pre,:>ervatJon
126- 13" DBH Sabal Palm
20
125- 12' DBH Sabal Pdlm
3.0
Comments Overhead canopy wlillestflct grO\vth
128- IV[ ultl-~tem LIgUSlJ um
2.5
N/A
Comment'> ThIS lree I1as :l lopsldea Cro\Vll bm could be leSIOlea to a u::.efu! nee \Nllll
proper pruning and general care, Ie, proper fertilizatIon, watenng etc
129- 9" DBH Queen Palm
3.0
N/A
Comments Nice palm but wlll eventually grov,,r mto the canopy of tree #130
130- 51" DBH LlVe Oak
4.5
18'N, 42'S, J 8'E, 51 'W
Comments I hlS tree has a u11lque appearance due to a dramatic lean to the west It has
good <;tructUle m the upper Clown and velY appealmg blanch aJchlteclUJe Thele I':> no
dl::>ct:ll1lbJe decay aJOund the lOot coJjaJ 10 WppOIt such a s~vele l~an thiS tlee hi1~
developed an extensive root sy~tem to the ea5t ThiS IS one of the finest trees on the SIte
ana SI10uld be 111eorpOli1led 111(0 1!1e SHe aeslgn if [1115 nee IS LO be preserved 11 \VIII be
necessary to protect the rootmg zone to the east It is CrItIcally Important not to Impact the
lalge stluctUlal loots to the cast If necessaIy a lenlll type footer syste1il should be
constructed over thiS tree's root system
11 L 8' DRH Ql'''''''''' P,lm
oJ l .L..IJ. J'v~.l.l .i .........l...~
" ~
......1
N/A
C01llments ThIS 1S a good palm but the plesence of bee #130 'will plevent the canopy
from spreadmg
132- 13' DBH Saba! Palm
2.0
N/A
I'
ORIGINAL
Commenb I Ins palm Lould glOw thlOUgh <In eAbtlng apL.l1Ing ll1 the canopy at tIL.0
# 130, but ultllTlatel y the canople::. \\i 11 I compete
133- 12" DBI-! Sabal Palm
1.5
N/A
Comments ThIs palm will likely grow to the south for sunlight but wlil encountel the
oak canopy Palm should probably be rcmoved
134- 13' DBH Sabal Palm
3.0
N/A
Commenb 1 hiS pdlm has d cm ve m the hunk and 15 glO\VlI1g towal J thl;:., ...,oulhe(JSl. 11 IS
dn attracttvc palm WIth a large crown but restncts the Vle\\ of tree # 130's crown NOTE
T lee # j 30, as notcd above, lS a umq ue u ee WI Ul sel pcnt! ne oranches A deuslOn 'mould
be made concerning the fate of tree # s 125, 126, 127, 129, 13 I, 132,133, and 134 The
clcs1gne1 can leave lhlS a.lea as a stallc! vvlth the iJRlms, oak rUlc! hgllSllLll11 01 lCl110val some
or all of the pnlms to <;howcase the structure of the oak
1,5- OlcJncler duster (JIlenum oleander)
1.0
N / .t'~
Comments flus sluub ha.s some vll1eS and IS lllegulm III shape but can be lestOled WIth
prul1lng
136- Oleander cluster
25
N/A
Commenb Small clUSlel of oleandeh that Lould be shaped and I11corplHateJ mta Site
landscape
137- 14" DSH Sabal Palm
1.0
N/A
Comment') TIllS palm IS located on the Palm Bluff nght of WolY and unclcl uttijlty~ -wIres~ -
and light A<;k Cny to remove tim, lIee i f (~
138- 10" DBB Queen Palm 2.5 N/A I1&!J I
~
=
rul
~I
.(O~
and has a v131y-good
Comments Will Improvc lf mcorporated mto site landscdpmg and fertlhzed
""""
c:>
~
0)
<'J
CL
W
V)
139 Podocarpus cluster (Podocarpu.s mao ophyLLus) 2.0
N/A
Comment::. Remove unle5& illS used as eJ\lstmg landscapmg
140- t5" DBH Sabdl P3.!m
35
N/A
Commel1ts ThIS palm 1S located on the Palm Bhlff llght of 'way
trunk but needs prul1Ing
.-
2:
li.J rr
~ w
Q .-
S ~
w(J)6:
~UJ.-'
uQw
c....>....J
<4ffiU
l'JU)'--
2: 0
z i:
~ 01
14 I - If'. II" DRH Cherry Laurel
I 0
N/A
ORIGINAL
CoJl11l11t:llt5:. 111l~ tn,(; IS on the Palm BlulllIghtuf way dnd l~ ~t.-v(;ldy dechnll1g-b\.mtaL.l~- --=-
City for removal I - -0 ~ ~ [E ~%7 ~ : I .
142- 4" DBH Podocarpus 2JI N/_i ~~ [l__::!./(,
Comments This tree has poor appearance recommend temoval U U SEP 2 9 2004
I
143- 21' DBf-1 Live Oak
35 26'N,! a's, ~vEJI'2&G\\~ D[VElOPMENT
SERVICES
Commt:nb I Ill') tlt:c ha:::. good clown den~lly and appealmg stJ ue ute hQ6~p2&.]~MrRWATER
wlil '7ilgt1lficantly enhance aesthetlC appeoll Thl5 tree IS one of a stand and GUnsequently
grows to the north due to competitIon from adJacent trees Preserve as part 01 a <;tand
14...J.- 18" 21" DI3I-1 LIve Oak
2.5
u'N, 36 S, 36'E, 20 \V
COlnn1entc) ThIS tree h~IS been devalued due to the presence of a co-domlndnt stenl lo\v In
the trunk Cabling and bracll1g can 111l1lgate thiS SituatIOn ThiS procedure IS lughly
It.-....ollllllcnded as the tlee is sItuated 011 the Palm Bluff ught of way and pedestliculS alld
vehicles will be targets Tree's canopy should be elevated over road rhls tree IS a
valuable member of an ::uuacuve stand of lIve oaKS mal enI1::ll1Ce 1M :1djacel1l plopeny
ancl should be preserved The CIty may be wll1mg to share the (.Osl of cdbhng and braemg
thIS tree
145- 20' DBH Live Oak
3.0
lS'N, 20'S, O'E, 21 W
Comments ThiS tree IS on the Palm Bluff nght of way and togethel with trees # 143 and
144 make a very attrdctlve stand The stand will show <;lgl1lficant Improvement III health
ana appearance If properly pruned ThiS tree has a small and lITegular Clown due 10
competJ tlOn but WOt ks well In the afOl ementlOned stand TIllS tree has mtel estlllg
lWl5tmg, droopmg branches that gIve It character Tree ha5:. very good cro\<vn denSity
146- 12" DHH Camphor
1.5
N/A
Comme!its lE- TIllS liee is 011 the Palm Bltdf llght of way and has pOOl f01111, \Nl11
damage the curb and 1<; competmg with dc':mable native hve oak stand ThiS tree should
be remo"ed Contact City and request removal
147- 8' DSH Queen Palm
2.5
N/A
Commems TJllS tree IS on the Palm Bluff nght of wa) and IS growmg IntO tile canopIes
of tree #s 143,144 and 145 ]he tree will have trouble In the future as It attempts to grow
thlOugb the canopy 1 he effect 15:. not all bad <lnJ the deCI~lOl1 to pi eSt: I ve thiS tree ~hould
rest With the Site deSigner
:4
~
.~
~
"'
CITY OF CLEARWATER
'j \ '/,
IL f t \ 1 ~
" -
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
Posr OHIO. Box 4748, ClI-AR\VATER, FWRlDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAl SERVJCE~ BUILDING, 100 501JTH MYRTIE AVFNlJE, Cn.ARwATER, FWRlDA 33756
TLLEPHONl (727) 562-4567 FAA (727) 562-4576
~
loNG RANGr PI.MNING
DEVELOPMENT REV1[\V
May 16,2005
KeIth Zayac & AssOcIates
701 Enterpnse Road, SUIte 404
Safety Harbor, FL 34695
RE Development Order regardmg case FLS2004-09064/ PLT2004-00014 at 300 Palm Bluff Street
(palm Bluff SubdivIsion)
Dear Mr Zayac
ThIS letter constltutes a Development Order pursuant to SectIOn 4-202 E of the Community
Development Code On November 12, 2004, the Development ReVIew CommIttee (DRC) revIewed
your appheatlon for PrelImmary Plat approval to create eIght new resldentlallots and one common area
lot (PLT2004-00014) and FlexIble Standard Development (FLS2004-09064) to construct eIght new
detached dwellIng umts, m the LMDR zomng dlstnct, per Seetlons 2-203 C (ResIdentIal Infill ProJect)
and 4-703 A The request mcludes
Lot 1 Front (west) Setback from 25 0 fcet to 12 7 feet to bmldmg
Increase m bmldmg height from 25 feet to 35 feet measured from the mean average of eXIstmg
grade to the flat rooftop
Lot 2 Front (west) Setback from 250 feet to 4 96 to bmldmg
Front (east) Setback from 25 0 feet to 15 0 feet to building
Front (south) Setback from 25 0 feet to 5 0 feet to bmldmg
hlcrease m bUIldmg hClght from 25 feet to 35 feet measured from the mean average of eXlstmg
grade to the flat rooftop
Lot 3 Front (east) Setback from 250 feet to 150 feet to bmldmg
Increase m hmldmg heIght from 25 feet to 35 feet measured from the mean average of eXIstmg
grade to the flat rooftop
Lot 4 Front (south) Setback from 25 0 feet to 15 0 feet to bmldmg
Front (west) Setback from 250 feet to 50 feet to bmldmg
Front (west) Setback from 25 0 feet to 5 0 feet to butldmg
BKIAN J AUN(.~ I M-I. 'tOR
I H.AM.. HIllHAK[) Vie I MA \ OK
!:III L JON"ON, Cal'NCIU,jr\lIJrH
I-I aYI HAMIL I at-<, CallNULI fr\IHrR
(\RLI N A PL'I K'I 'J, COl'''( 11"\llIIBI R
@
"[au II 1'.\11'1 OY~IFN I ANI) ArrlRM'\l IvF Ac I ION CMPLO\l:R"
'1
".
May \6, 2005
Zayac & Assoc - Pdge Two
Lot 4 Side (east) Setback from 25 0 feet to zero feet to pavement
Side (north) Setback flom 25 0 feet to zelO feet to pavement
Increase 111 bUIldmg height from 25 feet to 35 feet mea<;ured flOm the mean avewge of eXlstll1g
grade to the fla t rooftop
Lot 5 Front (west) Setback from 25 0 feet to 7 0 feet to butldll1g
Front (south) Setback from 25 0 feet to \5 11 feet to buJidll1g
Front (north) Setback from 25 0 feet to 8 22 feet to bUlldll1g
Lot 6 Front (east) Setback from 2S 0 feet to 539 feet to bUIldIng
Front (south) Setback from 25 0 feet to 18 2 feet to bUlldmg
Front (north) Setbaek from 25 0 feet to 70 feet to bUIldll1g
Lot 7 Front (south) Setback from 2S 0 feet to 1746 feet to bmldmg
Rear (north) Setback from 15 0 feet to 10 12 feet to bUIldIng
Side (east) Setback from 5 0 feet to 2 0 feet to pavement
Lot 8 Front (south) Setback from 25 0 feet to 5 0 feet to bUlldll1g
Front (east) Setback from 25 0 feet to 5 63 feet to bmldmg
The ORC recommended approval of the applicatIOn with the folloWIng bases and condItions
Bases for Approval
1 The proposal comphe5 wIth Residential Infill Cntena under the provIsIOns of SectlOn 2-203 C,
2 The plan complies with General Applicability Cn tena under the provISIons of SectIOn 3-913, and
3 The proposed development IS compatible with the surroundmg area
CondItions for Approval
I That Final plat appllcatIon and plat be submitted to the EngIneenng Department Plat must be
approved by City CounCil pnor to recordmg wIth Pmella& County
2 That Filla! plat IS recorded wIth Pmcllas County pnoT to the Issuanee of a bUIldlllg permit
3 That any future addItIons to lots 1 through 8 comply with a 0 65 Impervious Surfdce Ratio (ISR)
4 That pnor to Issuance of a bUlldmg permIt, plans wdlllldIcate how entrance gates Will be operated
I e gate console,
5 That pnor to Issuance of a bmldlllg permit, proVIde a double nng Illfiltrometer test at the retentlOn
pond demonstratmg a 24 hour recovery time,
6 That pnor to Issuance of a bmldmg permit, plans Will 111dlcate the garage floor elevatlOns for all the
homes and show that 111 a IOOyr storm that they will not flood,
7 That pnor to Issuance of a bmldmg permit, provide a Tree PreservatlOn Plan prepared by a certIfied
arb on st, consul tmg arbonst, land&cape archl teet or other specmh s t m th e fi el d 0 f arbon cui tUfe, an d
8 That all Fire Department Code reqUirements be met pnor to the Issuance of any permits
S IPlalllllllg Depw /men/le D BIFle;r; :'/andm d (FL '5)IPendlllg Casesl2 - ReViewed (lnd Pelldmg\Palm Bluff 300 (LMDR) l1\VallJlIg resub lVSIPalm Bluff
51 300 fJevelopmel1l Orde' doc
'.
May 16,2005
Zayac & A ",>oc - Page Three
I concur with the findl11gs of the Development RevIew Committee and, through tlus letter, olpprove
your apphcatlOn for Flexible Standard Development with the above eIght condltlon::. The approval IS
based on and must adhere to the sIte plan and applicatIOn received October 8, 2004, revIsed buddl11g
elevatlOns dated I eCeJved January 27, 2005 and the revised site plan dated I ecelved May 6, 2005
Pursuant to SectIOn 4-303, an appl1catlOn for a buIldlllg permit ::.hall be made wlthm one year of
Flcxl ble Standard Development approval (May 16, 2006) All reqUl red certIficates of oc(,Upancy 5hall
with <,uccesslve owners
The Issuance of thl& Development Order does not rel1eve you of the nece&<y to obtam any bUlldll1g
permits or pay any Impact fees that may be reqUired In order to facIhtate the Issuance of any permIt or
license affected by thl& approval, please bnng a eopy of thl5 letter With you when applYing for any
permits or licenses that require this pnor development approval
Pursuant to Section 4-502 A, an appeal may be Imtlated wIthll1 seven days of the date the Development
Order IS Issued by an applIcant or property owners wlthm the reqUired notIce area and who presented
compctent substantIal eVIdence m the Level One review A copy of the Development Order IS bemg
sent to those surroundmg property owners who presented competent substantral eVidence m the Level
One reVIew The filIng of an apphcatlOnlnotJce of appeal shall stay the effect of the decl~lOn pendmg
the final determmatlon of the case The appeal penod for your case will explre on May 23, 2005,
(seven days from date of Development Order)
if you have any questions, please do not heSItate to call John Sehodtler, Planner I, at 727-562-4604
You can access zonmg for parcels wlthll1 the City through our webslte www myc1earwater com *
Make Us Your Favontel
~~
Michael Delk, AiCP
Planmng Director
S IPlanl1lllg Depilllment\C D BIFlel' Standard (FLS)IPendmg Cases\] - Reviewed and PendmglP{llm Bluff 300 (LMDR) awaumg resub JVS\Palm Bluff
;:'1300 Development O/del doc
;SEHD It 113 REPORT
May 17 2005 09:46RM
YOUR LOGO
YOUR FRX NO
CltyOfClearwater-Plan Dept
727 562 4865
NO. OTHER FRCSIMILE
01 97939855
START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PRGES RESULT
May 17 09.43RM 02'30 SND 04 OK
TO Tl..IRN OFF REPORT. PRESS · MENU' l:UM.
THEN SB.ECT OFF BY US I NG '+. OR · -' .
FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASS I STANCE. PLEASE o::tLL 1-800-HEL.P-FAX (435-7329).
~~a~~arwater
I-- '" _ I
U
TO:
FAX COVER MEMO
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
100 s. MYRTLE AVE., 2nd Floor
CLEARW A TER, FL 33756
(727) 562..4567 FAX: (727) 562..4865
K'-Q..dL L-Q.\.;\Al;C..--
793 - 9~5
FAX:
Phone:
FROM: 00\1 0{) S Phone:
DATE: oS I 7 D S- SUBJECT:
MESSAGE:
NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE)
tf
. ....'
PALM BLUFF SUBDIVISION
PRELIMINARY ENGINEERS OPINION OF COST
Description Amount Units U nit Cost Total
General Conditions
1 Silt Fence 1500 LF $ 1 00 $1,50000
Subtotal $1,50000
Earthwork and Gradlnq
1 Imported Fill 8000 CY $ 700 $56,00000
2 FInal Grading 1 LS $ 25,000 00 $25,00000
4 Sod 12900 SY $ 300 $38,700 00
Subtotal $119,700 00
Storm Dralnaae System
1 Storm Inlet 3 EA $ 2,50000 $7,50000
2 Class III PIpe 436 LF $ 3000 $13,08000
3 MItered End Section 1 EA $ 1,50000 $1,50000
4 Storm Manhole 2 EA $ 2,500 00 $5,00000
5 Retalmng Wall Mod 1 LS $ 5,000 00 $5,000 00
Subtotal $32,08000
Sanltarv Sewer
1 8" San PVC 125 EA $ 1800 $2,25000
2 Samtary Manhole 1 LF $ 2,500 00 $2,50000
3 2" PVC FM 460 LF $ 1200 $5,52000
4 Sanitary Services 8 EA $ 500 00 $4,00000
5 lift Station 1 LS $ 30,00000 $30,00000
6 Connect to EXist 1 LS $ 500 00 $500 00
7 Directional Bore 150 LF $ 180 00 $27,00000
Subtotal $71,77000
Water Distribution System
1 6" PVC W M 410 LF $ 1500 $6,15000
2 Fire Hydrant 1 EA $ 2,10000 $2,10000
3 Water Services 8 EA $ 500 00 $4,00000
Subtotal $12,25000
Pavement & Misc.
1 Asphalt Pavement 1350 SY $ 1600 $21,60000
2 Open Cut and Repair 350 SY $ 3200 $11,200 00
3 Concrete Curbing 1,500 LF $ 800 $12,00000
4 Pavement Markings 1 LS $ 5,00000 $5,00000
5 Screen Wall 1200 LF $ 7500 $90,00000
6 Sidewalk 540 LF $ 1500 $8,10000
Page I of 1
Schodtler, John
From
Sent
To
Subject
Keith Zayac [kelth@kelthzayac com]
Wednesday, Apnl 20, 2005 1 54 PM
Schodtler, John
Re Palm Bluff
Please change my request to the revised request as noted
Keith E Zayac, P E, RLA
KeIth Zayac & AssocIates, Inc
701 Enterpnse Road E , Ste 404
Safety Harbor, FL 34695
727-793-9888 phone
727-793-9855 fax
--~-- Onglnal Message -----
From John Schodtler@myClearwater com
To kelth@kelthzayac com
Sent Tuesday, Apn119, 2005256 PM
Subject RE Palm Bluff
Keith, I think you have that back words
Please delete the previously submitted cross sections of the homes from this project file The remaining
Individual home elevations across the site will remain part of this submittal
-----Ong I nal Message-----
From: Keith Zayac [mallto'kelth@kelthzayac corn]
Sent: Fnday, Apn115, 2005 5'44 PM
To: Schodtler, John
Subject: Palm Bluff
John per our conversation please delete the previously submitted individual home elevations from this
project file The remaining cross sedons of the homes across the site Will remain part of thiS submittal
Also attached IS an opinion of cost for the project
Keith E Zayac, P E , RLA
Keith Zayac & ASSOCiates, Inc
701 Enterpnse Road E , Ste 404
Safety Harbor, FL 34695
727-793-9888 phone
727 -793-9855 fax
4/2012005
.
...
"
.
Page I of2
Schodtler, John
From Schodtler, John
Sent Tuesday, Apnl 26, 2005 845 AM
To 'rbames'
Subject RE PALM BLUFF PRESERVE
Richard,
Attached IS the definition of bUilding height This should help to answer the questions below
Helght, but/dmg or structure, means for bmldmgs, the vertIcal distance from the mean elevatIOn of the
eXlst1l1Kgrade to the highest fimshed roof surface 111 the case of a bmldmg wIth a flat roof, or the vertical
distance from the eXIstmg grade to a pomt representmg the mIdpoint of the peak and eave helghts of the
mam roof structure of the roof of a buildmg havmg a pItched roof For other structures, thc vertlcal
distance from eXIstmg grade to the hIghest pomt of the structure above such eXIstmg grade Where
minimum floor elevatIOns m flood p-rone areas have been establIshed by law. the bUlldmg heIght may- be
measured as though the regmred mmlmum floor elevations constitute eXlstmg grade In addition, (1)
lInear radio and teleVIsIon antennas shall be penmtted to proJect ten feet hIgher than the maximum
heIght otherwise specIfied for the zonmg dIstnct wIthm whlch the antenna IS located Parabohc and
other geometrIcally shaped antenna shall not be permitted thIS heIght mcrease (2) Flagpoles located on
top ofbmldlngs shall be penmtted to proJect ten feet higher than the maximum heIght otherwise
speCified for the zonmg dlStnct assigned to the property (3) Elevator eqUlpment rooms and hke
mechanical eqmpment enclosures shall be permitted to 12roJect up to 16 feet hIgher than the maximum
heIght otherwise speCIfied for the ZOning dlStnCt assIgned to the property. (4) Parapet walls constructed
on bmldmgs wlth flat roofs shall be perrllltted to extend not hIgher than 30 mches over the maXimum
height speclfied for the zomng dlstnct m WhICh the bmldmg IS located
-----Ongmal Message--m
From: rbames [mallto rbames@bellsouth net]
Sent: Monday, Apnl 25, 2005 5'08 PM
To: Schodtler, John
Subject: Re PALM BLUFF PRESERVE
MR SCHODTLER
I'VE BEEN IN CONVERSATION WITH SHANE AMES, OUR PRICIPAL & JOHN BRECO ONE OF THE
OWNERS, TO BE ALBE TO SOLVE THIS HEIGHT ISSUE AS SOON AS POSSIBLE
I HAVE A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS, IS THE AVERAGE GRADE MEASSURED FROM THE
PROPOSED GRADE OR IS FROM THE EXISTING GRADE, ALSO ARE THE ELEVATOR TOWERS
AND PARAPET WALLS INCLUDED IN THIS HEIGHT RESTRICTION OR CAN THESE ELEMENTS
EXCEED THE 35 FEET, I WOULD GRATEL Y APPRICIATE IF YOU CAN ANSWER ME AS SOON AS
POSSIBLE, SO I CAN FINISH ALL MY CALCULATIONS AND ADJUST MY DRAWINGS TO BE ABLE
TO SUSMITT AGAIN
THANKS AGAIN
RICHARD
----- Onglnal Message -----
From John Schodtler@mvClearwatercom
To rbames@bellsouth net
Sent Thursday, Apn121, 2005 342 PM
Subject RE PALM BLUFF PRESERVE
4/2612005
.
.
.'
/,
...
.
Page 2 of2
Richard,
At the Development Review Meetll1g and the followll1g meeting It was discussed that the bUildings
located along Osceola Avenue could be Justified to a maximum bUilding height of 35 feet (from the
average grade of each mdlvlduallot) with staff's recommendation All other bUlldmgs would have to
meet minimum code I have been waiting for a revised site data table ll1dlcatlng the bUlldll1gs comply as
stated above and was not aware there was a problem
John Schodtler
Planner I
-----Onglnal Message-----
From: rbames [mallto rbames@bellsouth net]
Sent: Wednesday, Apn120, 20052.33 PM
To: Schodtler, John
Subject: PALM BLUFf PRESERVE
GOOD AfTERNOON MR SCHODTLER
I'M RICHARD FROM AMES DESIGN INTERNATIONAL, WE ARE THE ARCHITECTS FOR
THE PLAM BLUFF PRESERVE PROJECT
I HEARD FROM THE OWNER THAT THERE IS AN ISSUE WITH THE HEIGHT OF SOME OF
THE BUILDINGS I WILL BE VERY HAPPY TO GET IN TOUCH WITH YOU TO SOLVE THIS
PROBLEM AS SOON AS POSSIBLE YOU CAN EITHER CONTACT ME BY PHONE OR BY
E-MAIL,
THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR YOUR TIME
Cordially yours
Richard Brummer
Ames DeSign International
Ph 561-2746444
4/26/2005
Page 1 of 1
Schodtler, John
From Schodtler, John
Sent Tuesday, Aprtl19, 2005257 PM
To 'Keith Zayac'
Subject RE Palm Bluff
Keith, I think you have that back words
Please delete the previously submitted cross sections of the homes from thls project file The remaining
individual home elevations across the site Will remain part of thiS submittal
-----Onglnal Messagen---
From: Keith Zayac [mallto'kelth@kelthzayac com]
Sent: Fnday, Apn115, 2005 5 44 PM
To: Schodtler, John
Subject: Palm Bluff
John per our conversation please delete the prevIously submitted individual home elevations from thiS
project file The remaining cross sections of the homes across the site Will remain part of thiS submittal
Also attached IS an opinion of cost for the project
Keith E Zayac, P E , RLA
Keith Zayac & ASSOCiates, Inc
701 Enterprtse Road E , Ste 404
Safety Harbor, FL 34695
727-793-9888 phone
727-793-9855 fax
4/19/2005
v
Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc.
CIVIl Englneenng, Landscape Architecture, Planning
701 S Enterpnse Road E , Ste 404
Safety Harbor, FL 34695
(727) 793-9888 Phone
(727) 793-9855 Fax
kelth@kelthzavac com
Apnl 5, 2005
Il- I~ -\ II::::::' ~l ~ J
-- r 1'- II' I
- -=' \'/)--
. L_ \V IL! '\1 [- j I
- ,,~ -- J l --, I I
Mr John Schodtler
City of Cleatwater PlannIng Department
100 S Myrtle Ave
Clearwater, FL 34695
OR \"G \ NAla 2005
RE: FLS2004-09064 300 PALM BLUFF ST
-
,,~, ,,,"G C ~ cVElOPi'M:J~T
Sf f1ViCES
)' OF CL~!'~':~:~!ER
Dear Mr Schodtler
Enclosed please find (8) eight sets of reVIsed CIvil construction plans based on the previously
transmitted site plan and addressing remaining staff comments Including the follOWIng
ENGINEERING
. A note has been added to the plans stating that the adjacent sidewalks will be Improved
to current standards If necessary
. A staging area has been added for black barrel trash containers
. A note has been added to plans acknowledging that the City WIll field locate all water
meters pnor to utility construction
. Exlstmg lot #17 IS currently a double lot with access to the public roadway north of the
project If the lot was spilt, It would be the responsIbility of the property owner to prOVide
an access easement to the eXisting publiC nght of way access, and not across the pnvate
property thiS project occupies. ThiS was discussed and agreed upon at our prevIous
meebng.
. Per our preViOUS meetmg, the Sidewalk WIll not proVide access to the north nght of way
but stop at the northern most dnveway, since thiS access IS open only to emergency and
trash service The proposed Sidewalk along the main dnve WIll prOVide Internal
pedestrian access only to Palm Bluff 81.
. A note has been added to the plans Identlfymg the lots WIth three and two car garages
Based on the three and two car garages the project exceeds City reqUired parkmg
. The Sidewalk WIdth has been reVised to 5 0 feet
. There are no proposed pedestnan gate and SIdewalk access pOInts to the northern
emergency access per our prevIOus meeting
. A note has been added to the utility plan calling for the manhole at Palm Bluff 8t and
Osceola Ave to be hned
. An ADA handicap ramp will be Installed at Palm Bluff and Osceola Intersection
. Per our meeting the connectlon currently shown to the 4" water line IS acceptable
I
J "
, ,
!)I
j I
. I
I
I
i
---1
<(
z
-
<..!)
-
~
o
. Based on my telephone conversatIOns WIth the Fire Marshall, a 20 ft Wide dnveway Will
be acceptable due to the short distance of the dnve It IS antiCIpated that a fire truck
would stage wrthln the eXisting nghts of way
. A hose bib has been added near the 11ft station
. The sanitary serviceS have been revised to 6" wyes
. The City detail has been Included In these plans to show a c1eanout on all proposed
sanitary seMces
. The street name has been changed to Sunset Dnve and Will be submitted to the
appropnate agencies pnor to construction
. The sidewalk has been detailed per IndeX #109
. The proposed gate on the north side Will open for emergency and to proVIde adequate
access for the garbage trucks, and not require an Internal turn around A staging area
has been established on the site plan
. A note IS not the utility plan calling for all eXisting and proposed utilities to be located
underground
. AlC pads approXImate locations have been added to the site plan
. The water meter location for lot #8 has been revised as requested
PRELIMINARY PLAN
. The easements have been dimenSioned
. The "foor marks have been added to the length dimenSions
. The easements have been labeled as "access, utility and drainage easements (typ r
ENGINEERING CONDITIONS
. A statement regarding vehicular access locations has been added to the site plan
. A drainage easement over the pond has been added
r 1l
. The gate controls, power, etc WIll be located WIthin Tract A and easements shown
FIRE CONDITION
. A note has been added to the site plan acknowledging that the entry gates must open to
the entire WIdth of the roadway, and that an emergency vehicle access system must be
Installed and comply wrth Plnellas County Ordinance #98-4.
. We have once again venfled with the architect that the proposed houses Will not be
spnnklered
. Based on our conversation with the Office of the Fire Marshall, the roadway WIdth IS
adequate as deSigned.
'"
, ,
r... ^ _
, ,
l:'
. I
,
,
,
I.
" .
"
'.
"
, ,
I,
-'
,
{, )
.!
" "\-J ..
, "
-, .
",
, '
,
.
. - ~
I "
, ,
...
,"
,..
...:~ , J
.,
'1
",
~) IE ~'~ ~\~? I,' ,
I f f.....J< J r----
1, ,Ai'N 8 2005
L ".
- 4_;- -~_l
-r .
PLl1..NI~ING g ~,.::VELOPMLln
SEi1V1CES '
r y or'CIJ:MWVATER
_Ill.-.
, , I
,
,1/1
~./
I
I
I
L,~
""""""
",,r,-~
~
-~
"""="-
(i~)
'---..,
~~
--..J
CJ
v
--'
c:::(
-z
--
u:>
--
ex:.
o
LANDSCAPE
. The required site tnangles are shown on the plans Site tnangles are not shown at the
northern entrance since It IS for emergency and trash pickup only.
. The SN has been removed and the av relocated outsIde of the southern entrance srte
tnangles
. The plans on the southeast comer have been labeled
.'lfn~r)notf(UI9~ been added to the plans reqUlnng adequate Internal trees to be planted on
k~!-eacb lot'at time of IndIVIdual house perrmtbng and construction
~J A tree preservation plan WIll be submitted pnor to building permrt.
FR RECREATION IMPACT FEE
. It IS acknowledged that a $1400 fee ts due pnor to buIlding permit ISSuance or final plat.
SOLID WASTE CONDITION
. It IS acknowledged that residents must supply their own cans.
ZONING CONDITION
. Lot conflQuratJon and access dnve tract have been redesigned per the preViously
submitted site plan to address 0 65 ISR maximum
o · The cost estimate will be emalled
. The fencmglwall along Palm Bluff and Osceola Avenue has been relocated to be setback
three feet from the property hnes and buffer shrubs moved to the outside
. Photographs regarding height have been previously submitted The photographs were
proVIded to show similar conditIons near the proposed project
. The building height notes have been revised to show buildings wrthln zone X height
measurements from eXIsting grade
0-
O.
The FFE elevations shown Within the flood zones are all above the minimum height The
elevations are deSigned to prOVide a garage on the first level on several of the umts
The architectural height vanes WIth each IndIVIdual unit as noted on the site plan
Kert
Pre ant
Keith Zayac & AssOcIates, Ine
'0.
~ '
t,....I" r
I'
. ,
I '
,.1 :
" .
, ,
, .
" -
,~
"
, ,
0,
j
I I .... 1 'I
"-
(
<
'.
'j
" ,
" ,
l.J t I
e,
"
"
"
, -
,"
- ,
,
, ,
'.
>,-
~
-~~~--- -~ - ~ ~ -......... - ~- ~----~- ~ - -
r,
,';f5)~~~~'l~ \ F:\ i
" I',' '_" , " I j 1\
, ~:' 'API{ ~ 8'2005 3
L, \
PU,Nl";ING & DtVELOP~/L!:i-.jT
,<, SERV1CJi:S, ,
ell' OF CLEARWATER '
~--~~--~ ~~~-~-------~~-
~ .., Ii _ it:'-
1 it;: {
- ..
" ,
I, ,
I'
;:
"
c,
'I .
r ,
, '
:
f
Iln._
~
~v
-.::.
-""
Q)
t-.c.,,"l<~
~
o
, ~
~
,I
I,
If
y
Conditions Associated With
FLS2004-09064
300 PALM BLUFF ST
Engmeerlng Condition
1) All adjacent sidewalks to be Improved to current standards Including ADA Not Met
2) Solid waste trucks will only be able to drive main roadway Suggest a staging area for black
barrels 2/11/05 - SEE SOLID WASTE COMMENT
3) Need to show water main construction 2/4/05 - MET
4) Each water meter will be set by the City All a pphca b I e fees to be paid by the applicant 2/4/05-
CITY WILL FIELD LOCATE ALL WATER METERS
5) All proposed sal1ltary service wyes to be 6-lnch not 4-lnch as shown 2/11/05 - SEWER
SYSTEM IS PRIVATE AND INTERNAL TO SITE
6) The sanitary sewer system will be privately operated and maintained by the assOCiation 2/4105
- ACKNOWLEDGED
7) How does Lot #17, Palm Btuff SubdivIsion, gain access to their property? 2/11/05 LOT#17
AND ADJACENT LOT HAVE COMMON OWNERSHIP ACCESS IS PROVIDED FROM
ADJACENT LOT
8) Need to provide pedestraln access gates to eXlsttng rights-of-way 2/11/05 - PEDESTRIAN
GATE SHOWN TO PLAM BLUFF - OK
9) Where do VISitorS park? (Guests, service, deliveries, etc) 2/11/05 - SEE APPLICANT
RESPONSE
10) Need to provide pedestrian Sidewalks along a minimum on one Side of the private streets
2/11/05 - SIDEWALK PROVIDED ALONG ONE SIDE OF PRIVATE STREET
11) There may be additional comments based upon submittal of proposed water main location
and responses to these comments
2/4105
A) Sanitary sewer manhole at Palm Bluff Street and Osceola Avenue to be lined by apphcant per
City Standards
B) A D A handicap ramp with truncated domes per DOT Index #304 including the intersection
of Palm Bluff Street and Osceola Avenue
C) Need to extend proposed 6" water main up to Engman Street and connect to the eXisting 6"
water main for fire protection 2/23/05 - PER DISCUSSION WITH UTILITIES ENGINEERING,
LOOPING THE INTERNAL WATER LINE TO THE 4-INCH LINE ALONG SUNSET DRIVE IS
ACCEPTABLE
D) Need to have a water meter Installed for the hose bib located near the proposed lift station
E) Need to Install a clean out on all proposed sanitary service wye's per City of Clearwater
Contract Specifications and Standards, Part "C", Construction Standards, Index #305. 1 of 2
2/11/05 - CLEANOUTS SHOW N ON SHEET 9 OF 10
I) PRIOR TO FINAL PLAT APPROVAL, proposed street name will need to be approved by the
Post Office, Plnellas County and "911" City suggests the mternal main drive to be Sunset Drive
J) The proposed Sidewalk along Palm Bluff Street to be 4" thick 3,000 pSI fibrous concrete to be
Installed per City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards, Part "C", Construction
Standards, Index #109 2/11/05 - SHOWN ON SHEET 8 OF 10
K) All above grade utilities to be buried by the developer 2/11/05 - SEE SHEET 7 OF 10, NOTE
12
0) Need to show air conditioner pads for each Single-family home 2/11/05 - PROPOSED TO BE
INSTALLED UNDER CANTILEVERED STRUCTURE OR ON ROOF
P) Water meter for proposed Lot #8 will be Installed on the proposed 6" water mam Do not need
to Install the 6" x 4" tee, Install a 6" - 90 degree elbow Instead
Q) As proposed Sidewalk IS located at the back of curb, It must be 5' Wide
Plat Comments
1) All easements to be dimensioned
2) Units of length dimenSions not Identified
3) Need to label Ingress/egress easements
CaseCondltons
04/08f2005
Page 1 of 4
FLS2004-09064
300 PALM BLUFF ST
Engineering Condition
4) Need to Include a statement prohibiting access from Lots 1 - 2- 3 to Osceola and from Lots 3-
4 - 5 - 6 to Palm Bluff
5) Need a drainage easement for pond on pnvate property and that portion of the pond being
being constructed Within common area
6) Need easements for gate controls, power, etc on Lots 1 - 5 - 6
Prior to building permit
Record final plat With Plnellas County
Show locattons of proposed mailboxes
Fire Condition Joe Colbert Initials MIssing
01/18/2005 Entry gates must open to the entire Width of the roadway for Emergency Vehicle access An Not Met
Emergency Vehicle Access System must be Installed In gate and comply With Plnellas County
Ordinance # 98-4 PLEASE ACKNOWLEDGE
1/18/05 J _ C No acknowledgement made to cond Itlon of 1 0/22/04
01/31/2005 The architectural draWings submitted and received on 1/27/05 indicate that these homes are three Not Met
(3) stones Depending on the type of construction, these homes Will most likely have to Include
Fire Sprinklers and must have Hydrants and Fire Department Connections available for the
homes The Site plan must show the additional water supply for the Spnnkler coverage
02/01/2005 All drive lanes and streets must be a minimum unobstructed Width of 24 feet Not Met
As per Directive #2004-11-01-01 from the Offtce of the Fire Marshal
Landscape Site Triangle Cond Arden Dittmer 562-4604
10/25/2004 Landscape Plan does not show the Sight triangles as described In Article 3, DIVISion 9, revise the
plan to show these triangles at all the street and driveway Intersections
Not all are shown
Not Met
Landscape Site Triangle Plan Arden Dittmer 562-4604
10/25/2004 Per Section 3-1204 H Plants In the Sight triangles must be Installed In accordance With the
reqUIrements In Article 3, DIVISion 9 to minimiZe trafftc hazards
** There are two "SN" and one "QV" which Will create VISibility problems as they mature
Not Met
Landscape Perimeter Condltl Arden Dittmer 562-4604
1 0/25/2004 Plan does not meet the req Ulrements of perimeter pia ntlngs I n Cod e Section 3-1202 D
** 10 foot buffer reqUIred from street right of ways
Not Met
Landscape
1 0/25/2004
Arden Dittmer
562-4604
10/25/2004
The eXisting canopies of ALL trees must be shown The plan does not show ALL of them Please Not Met
darken slightly to clarify and somehow differentiate the canopies of trees proposed to remain from
those to be removed
There are a few errors on the plan Please correct and resubmit for review Not Met
1 Plant list IS missing a few plants shown on plan
2 Plants on SE corner are not labeled
3 Check the number of trees on each parcel vs the reqUired number based on the lot area
respectlvely
CaseCondllons
Print Dale 04/08/2005
Page 2 of 4
FLS2004-09064
300 PALM BLUFF ST
11/09/2004
Land Resource Condition
Rick Albee
562-4741
Provide a Tree Preservation Plan prepared by a certified arborlst, consulting arbonst, landscape Not Met
architect or other specialist m the field of arborlculture This plan must show how the proposed
bUlldmg, parkmg, stormwater and utilities Impact the cntlcal root zones (dnp lines) of tree to be
preserved and how you propose to address these Impacts Ie, crown elevating, building Imtels, root
pruntng and/or root aeration systems Other data reqUired on this plan must show the trees
canopy line, actual tree barricade limits (2/3 of the dnp Ime and/or m the root prune lines If
reqUired), and the tree barricade detail And any other pertment Informatton the arborlst feels
relates to tree preservation PrOVide prior to building permit
SFR Recreation Impact Fee
A Recreation FacIlity Impact fee of $1,400 IS due prior to bUlldmg permit Issuance or final, plat (If Not Met
applicable) whichever occurs first Contact Deb Richter at 727-562-4817 If questions
Solid Waste Condition Imtlals Mlssmg Initials MISSing
Residents must supply their own garbage cans according to City Code of Ordinances Sec 32 280 Not Met
2b Rear end service Will be utilized
Zonmg Condition John Schodtler 562-4604
S' 01/13/2005 Clanfy IS R calcu latlo ns For exam pie, how IS lot #5 meeting 0 65 I SR? It a ppea rs to be more Not Met
than 065
02/03/2005
B'01/13/2005
~ 01113/2005
U 02/03/2005
~~ 1'A~
o 02/03/2005
o 02/05/2005
PrOVide estimated project value via e-mail John schodtler@myclearwater com I can not locate Not Met
this Info within the last two re-submlttals
10/18/2004 PrOVide estimated project value
ReVised FenCing along Palm Bluff and Osceola Avenue Will need to be setback three feet from Not Met
front property lines and landscaped along the outSide pen meter per code
10/11/2004 Provide evidence supportmg how the characteristics of the fence heights and
setbacks are characteristic of other fence structures In the surrounding neighborhood
Photographs With dimenSions and/or surverys are acceptable
01/13/05 - Cia rlfy how eVld e nce prOVided supports bu lid Ing heights In excess of thirty feet? Not Met
PrOVide eVidence supportmg how the charactenstlcs of the requested Increased bUlldmg heights
are characteristic of other structures In the surrounding neighborhood Photographs With
dimenSions are acceptable
ReVised bUilding heights on lots located entirely In FEMA zone "X" to be measured from eXisting Not Met
grade While engmeenng reqUires the flntshed floor elevation (FFE) to be one foot above the
crown of the road, the bUlld1l1g height In these FEMA non-flood pla1l1 areas IS stili measured from
eXisting grade
ReVise FFE data on the site plans and bUilding elevations to reflect the follOWing 1) that lots Not Met
located In the FEMA flood plain VE14 Indicate FFE IS 14 feet 2)that lots located In the FEMA
flood plam AE12 mdlcate FFE IS 12 feet 3) that lots located m a FEMA flood plain X 1l1dlcate FFE
IS an average of eXisting grade from the highest elevation on the property to the lowest elevation
on the property .
Clanfy the requests for bUilding height The architectural elevations are shOWing a theme With a Not Met
35 foot Ime Has the request for building height changed?
CaseCondltons
Pnnt Date 04/08/2005
Page 3 of 4
Page 1 of 1
Schodtler, John
From: Schodtler, John
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005110 PM
To 'kelth@kelthzayaccom'
Cc: Parry, Mark
Subject. RE Palm Bluff
KeIth,
I spoke With management about the ISRlOSR under the bUlldll1g Issue and I was told that areas located under the
bUlldmgs are considered Impervious by the definition of "Open Space"
Open space means an area of a lot recelvmg permeable vegetative landscape treatment For the purpose
of computmg the I1lIllimUITI open space of any lot or front yard, retention and detentIOn areas may be
counted as open space and grassed surface parkmg spaces wInch are reqUIred by thIS development code
are not counted as open space
ThIS wIll reqUIre that the plans be revIsed to meet the 0 65 ISR reqUIrements
John Schodtler
Planner I
2/15/2005
Schodtler. John~' "Ac'. "1~~'f~V8~"~~"""~~."'~lr;;fA'4l:~1;yi.y+h';*" '<""VI .t~" ,t1
From Rice, Scott
Sent Monday, February 14, 2005 11 25 AM
To: 'Kelth@KelthZayac com'
Cc Schodtler, John
Subject. FLS2004-09064 - 300 Palm Bluff
Keith,
Two Issues were left outstanding on FLS2004-09064 - 300 Palm Bluff after our meeting last
Fnday
Lining manhole at Palm Bluff & Osceola As the proposed development wllllnvoJve installing a
force main and conng Into the manhole, CIty policy IS that the manhole must be relined In
accordance with City Standards
Extending the 6" water main up to Engman Street I venfled this reqUIrement with our Utilities
Engmeenng Manager EIther the eXisting 4" main along Sunset must be upgraded to 6" or a new
6" line Installed up to the pOlOt where It can be looped back Into a 6" main
D. Scott Rice
Land Deve/. Engr. Manager
727-562-4781
scott.rice@MyC/earwafer.com
i.IIII".'.I-~
1"~Ul-lq;;'
.,~",,..~..,,~&-
:~~'!~~\ ~1
..("lJ. _ _ ~.q:~
~ij;i.:~ J:::).
....?" -~ 9t:
".~.r.pJJ?~"~~\
....... ::4TEl\..".
Eng Ineerl ng4C'"dHa Itlon
1) All adjacent sidewalks to be Improved to current standards including ADA Not Met
2) Solid waste trucks will only be able to dnve main roadway Suggest a staging area for black
barrels 2/4/05 - NOT SHOWN ON REVISED SITE PLAN
3) Need to show water main construction 2/4/05 - MET
4) Each water meter will be set by the City All applicable fees to be paid by the applicant 2/4/05-
CITY WILL FIELD LOCATE ALL WATER METERS
5) All proposed sanitary service wyes to be 6-Inch not 4-lnch as shown 2/4/05 - NOT MET
6) The sal1ltary sewer system will be pnvately operated and maintained by the aSSOCiation 2/4/05
- ACKNOWLEDGED
7) How does Lot #17, Palm Bluff SubdivIsion, gain access to their property? 2/4/05 - NOT
SHOWN ON REVISED SITE PLAN
8) Need to provide pedestraln access gates to eXisting nghts-of-way 2/4/05 - NOT SHOWN ON
REVISED SITE PLAN
9) Where do vIsitors park? (Guests, service, dehvenes, etc) 2/4/05 - NEED TO SHOW ON SITE
PLAN
10) Need to provide pedestnan Sidewalks along a minimum on one Side of the private streets
2/4/05 - NOT MET NEED TO PROVIDE A 5 FT SIDEWALK ALONG BACK OF CURB
11) There may be additional comments based upon submittal of proposed water main location
and responses to these comments
Conditions Associated With
FLS2004-09064
od-! lllO~
300 PALM BLUFF ST
2/4/05
A) Pedestnan gate and concrete Sidewalk not shown for Sunset Dnve connectlont3 ~ 5~
B) Sanitary sewer manhole at Palm Bluff Street and Osceola Avenue to be lined by applicant per - 'Sf< uk\f\.t1
City Standards U
C) A D A handicap ramp with truncated domes per DOT Index #304 including the intersection 0
of Palm Bluff Street and Osceola Avenue
D) Need to extend proposed 6" water main up to Engman Street and connect to the eXisting 6" - 512 ~
water main for fire protection U
E) Dnve aisle Width to be a minimum of 24 ft of pavement (face of curb to face of curb) not 20 ft n L . ,
back of curb to back of curb as shown Lf. ,:p"iL.
F~ Need to have a water meter Installed for the hose bib located near the proposed 11ft station a 0 ~, '1' ~
G) All sal1ltary sewer service wye's to be 6" not 4" as shown Per City of Clearwater Contract ~ SA.
SpeCifications and Standards, Part "C", Construction Standards, Index #305, 1 of 2
H) Need to Install a clean out on all proposed sanitary service wye's per City of Clearwater
Contract SpeCifications and Standards, Part "C", Construction Standards, Index #305, 1 of 2
I) Proposed street name Will need to be approved by the Post Office, Plnellas County and "911"
City suggests the Internal mal n dnve to be Su nset Drive f"'tZ.l 0 \l.. lOP:> \...0 u.. ~6-(LM 'J '81
J) The proposed Sidewalk along Palm Bluff Street to be 4" thick 3,000 pSI fibrous concrete to be
11lstalled per City of Clearwater Contract SpeCifications and Standards, Part "C", Constructlon K&l 'SR ~
Standards, Index #109
K) All black barrel garbage containers need to be placed on same Side of dnve aisle on pick-up TOM GLE t-JrJ
day Developer has not prOVided a means of turning the truck around Lot #7 wlil need to place 7C>l
their barrel east Side of dnve aisle on Palm Bluff Street Need to prOVide staging area 00.0 Sf<. ~
L) Proposed Sidewalk located at the back of curb, Will need to be 5 ft In Width not 4 ft as shown fP :st<. &...J....oU
M) Need to show location of all mailboxes for proposed homes l2!3..:5/'2..... cl.tJ...d:::,.
N) All above grade utilities to be buned by the developer ~ SF- ~
0) Need to show alf conditioner pads for each Single-family home t:;i olLLcb..
P) Water meter for proposed Lot #8 will be Installed on the proposed 6" water main
to Install the 6" x 4" tee, Install a 6" - 90 degree elbow Instead
Do not need
t$3 K:Z... ~
1\.I.Ai~
Plat Comments
1) All easements to be dimenSioned
2) Units of length dimenSions not Identified
3) Need to label mgress/egress easements
Pnnt Date
CaseCondltons
1 of 3
FLS2004-09064
300 PALM BLUFF ST
Engmeermg Condition
4) Need to Include a statement prohibiting access from lots 1 - 2- 3 to Osceola and from lots 3-
4 - 5 - 6 to Palm Bluff
5) Need a drainage easement for pond on pnvate property and that portion of the pond being
being constructed within common area
6) Need easements for gate controls, power, etc on Lots 1 - 5 - 6
Fire Condition
01/18/2005
01/31/2005
02/01/2005
Pnor to bUilding permit, record final piat with PlneJlas County
Joe Colbert
562-4567 xt 3548
Entry gates must open to the entire Width of the roadway for Emergency Vehicle access An Not Met
Emergency Vehicle Access System must be Installed In gate and comply With Plnellas County
Ordinance # 98.4 PLEASE ACKNOWLEDGE
1/18/05 J_C No acknowledgement made to condition of 10/22/04
The architectural draWings submitted and received on 1/27/05 indicate that these homes are three Not Met
(3) stones Depending on the type of construction, these homes Will most likely have to Include
Fire Spnnklers and must have Hydrants and Fire Department Connections available for the
homes The Site plan must show the additional water supply for the Spnnkler coverage
All drive lanes and streets must be a minimum unobstructed WIdth of 24 feet Not Met
As per Directive #2004-11-01-01 from the Office of the Fire Marshal
Landscape Site Triangle Condl Arden Dittmer 562-4604
10/25/2004 landscape Plan does not show the Sight triangles as descnbed In Article 3, DIVISion 9, revise the
plan to show these tnangles at all the street and dnveway Intersections
Not all are shown
Not Met
Landscape Site Triangle Plant! Arden Dittmer 562-4604
10/25/2004 Per Section 3.1204 H Plants In the Sight triangles must be I nstalled In accordance With the
requirements In ArtIcle 3, DIVISion 9 to minimize traffic hazards
** There are two "SN" and one "QV" which Will create VISIbIlity problems as they mature
Not Met
Landscape Perimeter Conditio Arden Dittmer 562-4604
1 0/25/2004 Plan does not meet the requ Irem ents of penmeter plantl ngs I n Code Section 3-1202 D
** 1 0 foot buffer reqUired from street nght of ways
Landscape
1 0/25/2004
10/25/2004
Not Met
Arden Dittmer
562 -4604
The eXisting canopies of ALL trees must be shown The plan does not show ALL of them Please Not Met
darken slightly to clanfy and somehow differentiate the canopies of trees proposed to remam from
those to be removed
There are a few errors on the plan Please correct and resubmit for review Not Met
1 Plant list IS missing a few plants shown on plan
2 Plants on SE corner are not labeled
3 Check the number of trees on each parcel vs the reqUired number based on the lot area
respectively
11/09/2004
Land Resource Condition
Not Met
Pnnt Date
Rick Albee
562-4741
Provide a Tree Preservation Plan prepared by a certified arbonst, consulting arbonst, landscape
architect or other speclaltst In the field of arbonculture ThiS plan must show how the proposed
CaseCondltons
2 of 3
FLS2004-09064
300 PALM BLUFF ST
land Resource Condition Rick Albee 562-4741
bUlldmg, parking, stormwater and utilities Impact the critical root zones (dnp lines) of tree to be
preserved and how you propose to address these Impacts Ie, crown elevating, bUlldmg IlI1tels, root
pruning and/or root aeration systems Other data reqUIred on this plan must show the trees
canopy line, actual tree barncade limits (2/3 of the dnp line and/or In the root prune lines If
reqUIred), and the tree barncade detail And any other pertinent Information the arbonst feels
relates to tree preservation Provide pnor to bUlldll1g permit
SFR Recreation Impact Fee
A Recreation FacIlity Impact fee of $1 ,400 IS due pnor to bUilding permit Issuance or final plat (If Not Met
applicable) whichever occurs first Contact Deb Richter at 727-562-4817 If questions
Solid Waste Condition Inrtlals Mlssll1g Inltrals Mlssll1g
Residents must supply their own garbage cans according to Crty Code of Ordll1ances Sec 32 280 Not Met
2b Rear end servrce Will be utilized
ZOning Condition John Schodtler 562-4604
01/13/2005 Clarrfy ISR calculations For example, how IS lot #5 meetll1g 0 65 ISR? It appears to be more Not Met
than 0 65
02/03/2005
01/13/2005
01/13/2005
02/03/2005
02/03/2005
02/05/2005
Pnnt Date
Provide estimated project value via e-mail John schodtler@myclearwater com I can not locate Not Met
thiS Info Within the last two re-submlttals
10/18/2004 PrOVide estl mated project value
ReVised Fencll1g along Palm Bluff and Osceola Avenue Will need to be setback three feet from Not Met
front property lines and landscaped along the outside perrmeter per code c.o S <:..'
10/11/2004 Provide eVidence su pportmg how the charactensttcs of the fence heights and C-.L.o ~v\.;-r ~ '::
setbacks are characteristic of other fence structures In the surrounding neighborhood )1 6 AA "5
Photographs With dimenSions and/or surverys are acceptable tIj L-AN:>5C4.'1P' rv& '
01/13/05 - Clarify how eVidence provided supports bu Ildmg heights In excess of th Irty feet? Not Met
Provide eVidence supportll1g how the characteristiCS of the requested mcreased bUilding heights
are characteristic of other structures m the surroundmg neighborhood Photographs With
dImenSions are acceptable
ReVised bUilding heights on lots located entirely In FEMA zone "X" to be measured from eXisting Not Met
grade While engmeerlng requires the finished floor elevation (FFE) to be one foot above the
crow-n of the road, the bUilding height m these FEMA non-flood plain areas IS stili measured from
eXlstmg grade
ReVise FFE data on the site plans and bUilding elevatIons to reflect the follOWing 1) that lots Not Met
located In the FEMA flood plam VE14 mdlcate FFE IS 14 feet 2)that lots located In the FEMA
flood plain AE12 Indicate FFE IS 12 feet 3) that lots located In a FEMA flood plam X lI1dlcale FFE
IS an average of eXlstmg grade from the highest elevation on the property to the lowest elevation
on the property
Clarify the requests for bUlldmg height The architectural elevatIons are showmg a theme With a Not Met
35 foot line Has the request for bUlldmg height changed?
CaseCondltons
3 of 3
If ..,., ~,'IiII.r..rOIl
;l,~q?>\
~~~S!'~
;.CI":!. -=-, ~
r_~~ $j~
r':.'.,~ ~""
~~ - L'~~'
~~nPf\.V
Engineenng C'dH~tlon
1) All adjacent sidewalks to be Improved to current standards including ADA
2) Solid waste trucks will only be able to dnve main roadway Suggest a staging area for black
barrels 2/4/05 - NOT SHOWN ON REV]SED SITE PLAN
3) Need to show water main construction 2/4105. MET
4) Each water meter will be set by the City All applicable fees to be paid by the applicant 2/4/05-
CITY WILL FIELD LOCATE ALL WATER METERS
5) All proposed sanitary service wyes to be 6-lnch not 4-lnch as shown 2/4/05 - NOT MET
6) The sanitary sewer system Will be privately operated and maintained by the association 2/4/05
- ACKNOWLEDGED
7) How does Lot #17, Palm Bluff SubdivIsion, gain access to their property? 214/05 - NOT
SHOWN ON REVISED SITE PLAN
8) Need to provide pedestraln access gales to eXisting rights-of-way 2/4/05 - NOT SHOWN ON
REVISED SITE PLAN
9) Where do vISitors park? (Guests, service, dellvenes, etc) 2/4/05 ~ NEED TO SHOW ON SITE
PLAN
10) Need to provide pedestrian Sidewalks along a minimum on one Side of the private streets
2/4/05 - NOT MET NEED TO PROVIDE A 5 FT SIDEWALK ALONG BACK OF CURB
11) There may be additional comments based upon submittal of proposed water main location
and responses to Ihese comments
~onditions Associated With
FLS2004-09064
300 PALM BLUFF ST
2/4/05
A) Pedestrian gate and concrete Sidewalk not shown for Sunset Drive connection
B) Sanitary sewer manhole at Palm Bluff Street and Osceola Avenue to be lined by applicant per
City Standards
C) A 0 A handicap ramp with truncated domes per DOT Index #304 including the Intersection
of Palm Bluff Street and Osceola Avenue
D) Need to extend proposed 6" water main up to Engman Street and connect to the eXisting 6"
water main for fire protection
E) Dnve aisle Width to be a minimum of 24 ft of pavement (face of curb to face of curb) not 20 ft
back of curb to back of curb as shown
F) Need to have a water meter Installed for the hose bib located near the proposed 11ft station
G) All sanitary sewer service wye's to be 6" not 4" as shown Per City of Clearwater Contract
SpeCifications and Standards, Part "C", Construction Standards, Index #305, 1 of 2
H) Need to Install a clean out on all proposed sanitary service wye's per City of Clearwater
Contract SpeCifications and Standards, Part "C", Construction Standards, Index #305, 1 of 2
I) Proposed slreet name Will need to be approved by the Post Office, Plnellas County and "911"
City suggests the Internal main dnve to be Sunset Dnve
J) The proposed Sidewalk along Palm Bluff Street to be 4" thick 3,000 pSI fibrous concrete to be
Installed per City of Clearwater Contract SpeCifications and Standards, Part "C", Construction
Standards, Index #109
K) All black barrel garbage containers need to be placed on same Side of drive aIsle on pick-up
day Developer has not prOVided a means of turning the truck around Lot #7 Will need to place
their barre] east Side of drive aisle on Palm Bluff Street Need to prOVide staging area
L) Proposed Sidewalk located at the back of curb, Will need to be 5 ft In Width not 4 ft as shown
M) Need to show location of all mailboxes for proposed homes
N) All above grade utilities to be buried by the developer
0) Need to show air conditIoner pads for each Single-family home
P) Water meter for proposed Lot #8 Will be Installed on the proposed 6" water main Do not need
to Install the 6" x 4" tee, Install a 6" - 90 degree elbow Instead
Plat Comments
1) All easements to be dimensioned
2) Units of length dimenSions not Identified
3) Need to label Ingress/egress easements
Pnnt Date 02/07/2005
Page 1 of 3
Not Met
CaseCondltons
FLS2004~09064
300 PALM BLUFF ST
Englneenng Condition
4) Need to Include a statement prohibiting access from Lots 1 - 2- 3 to Osceola and from Lots 3 -
4 - 5 - 6to Palm Bluff
5) Need a drainage easement for pond on pnvate property and that portion of the pond being
being constructed within common area
6) Need easements for gate controls, power, etc on Lots 1 - 5 - 6
Prior to bUilding permit, record final plat with PlneJlas County
Fire Condition
01/18/2005
Joe Colbert
562-4567 xt 3548
01/31/2005
!
Entry gates must open to the entire Width of the roadway for Emergency Vehicle access An
Emergency Vehicle Access System must be Installed In gate and comply with Plnellas County
Ordinance # 98-4 PLEASE ACKNOWLEDGE
1/18/05 J _ C No acknowledgement made to cond Itlon of 1 0/22/04
The architectural draWings submitted and received on 1/27/05 Indicate that these homes are three
(3) stones Depending on the type of construction, these homes Will most likely have to Include
Fire Sprinklers and must have Hydrants and Fire Department Connectrons available for the
homes The Site plan must show the additional water supply for the Spnnkler coverage
All dnve lanes and streets must be a minimum unobstructed Width of 24 feet
As per Directive #2004-11-01-01 from the Office of the Fire Marshal
02/01/2005
Landscape Site Tnangle Cond Arden DIttmer 562-4604
10/25/2004 Landscape Plan does not show the sight tnangles as descnbed In Article 3, DIVISion 9, revIse the
plan to show these tnangles at all the street and dnveway Intersectlons
Not all are shown
Landscape Site Tnangle Plan Arden Dittmer 562-4604
10/25/2004 Per Section 3-1204 H Plants In the sight tnangles must be Installed In accordance with the
reqUirements In Article 3, DIVIsIon 9 to minimize traffic hazards
** There are two "SN" and one "QV" which Will create VISibility problems as they mature
Landscape Pen meter Condlti Arden Dittmer 562-4604
10/25/2004 Plan does not meet the requ Irements of pen meter plantlngs In Code Section 3-1202 D
*.. 10 foot buffer reqUired from street nght of ways
Landscape
10/25/2004
Arden DIttmer
562-4604
10/25/2004
The eXisting canopies of ALL trees must be shown The plan does not show ALL of them Please
darken slightly to clanfy and somehow differentiate the canopies of trees proposed to remain from
those to be removed
There are a few errors on the plan Please correct and resubmit for review
1 Plant list IS mlssmg a few plants shown on plan
2 Plants on SE corner are not labeled
3 Check the number of trees on each parcel vs the reqUired number based on the lot area
respectively
land Resource Condition
Rick Albee
562-4741
11/09/2004
ProVide a Tree Preservation Plan prepared by a certified arbonst, consulting arbonst, landscape
architect or other speclaltst In the field of arbonculture ThiS plan must show how the proposed
bUilding, parkmg, stormwater and utilities Impact the cntlcal root zones (dnp lines) of tree to be
Print Date 02107/2005
Page 2 of 3
Not Met
Not Met
Not Met
Not Met
Not Met
Not Met
Not Met
Not Met
Not Met
CaseCondllons
FLS2004-09064
300 PALM BLUFF ST
land Resource Condition Rick Albee 562-4741
preserved and how you propose to address these Impacts Ie, crown elevating, bUilding ltntels, root
pruning and/or root aeratlon systems Other data reqUired on this plan must show the trees
canopy line, actual tree bafflcade limits (2/3 of the dnp line and/or In the root prune lines If
reqUired), and the tree barncade detail And any other pertinent information the arbonst feels
relates to tree preservatIon Provide pflor to bUlldll1g permit
SFR Recreation Impact Fee
A Recreation FacIlity Impact fee of $1,400 IS due prior to bulldlng permit Issuance or final plat (If
applicable) whichever occurs first Contact Deb Richter at 727-562-4817 If questions
Not Met
Solid Waste Condition
Initials Mlssll1g
Inttlals MIssing
Residents must supply their own garbage cans according to City Code of Ordinances Sec 32280 Not Met
2b Rear end service will be utilized
Zonmg Condition John Schodtler 562-4604
01/13/2005 Clarify ISR calculations For example, how IS lot #5 meeting 0 65 ISR? It appears to be more Not Met
than 0 65
02/03/2005
01/13/2005
01/13/2005
02/03/2005
02/03/2005
02/05/~005
Provide estimated project value vIa e-mail John schodtler@myclearwater com I can not locate Not Met
thiS Info within the last two re-submltlals
10/18/2004 Provide estImated project val ue
RevIsed Fencll1g along Palm Bluff and Osceola Avenue will need to be setback three feet from Not Met
front property lines and landscaped along the outside penmeter per code
10/11/2004 Provide eVidence supporting how the charactenstlcs of the fence heights and
setbacks are charactenstlc of other fence structures In the surrounding neighborhood
Photographs with dimenSions and/or surverys are acceptable
01/13/05 - Clarify how eVidence provided supports bUilding heights In excess of thirty feet? Not Met
Provide eVidence supporting how the charactenstlcs of the requested Increased bUilding heights
are charactenstlc of other structures In the surrounding neighborhood Photographs with
dimenSions are acceptable
RevIsed bUilding heights on lots located entirely In FEMA zone "X" to be measured from eXlsttng Not Met
grade While englneenng reqUires the finished floor elevation (FFE) to be one foot above the
crown of the road, the bUilding height In these FEMA non-flood plain areas IS stili measured from
eXisting grade
Revise FFE data on the site plans and bUilding elevations to reflect the following 1) that lots Not Met
located In the FEMA flood plain VE14 indicate FFE IS 14 feet 2)that lots located In the FEMA
flood plain AE12 Indicate FFE IS 12 feet 3) that lots located In a FEMA flood plain X Indicate FFE
IS an average of eXisting grade from the highest elevation on the property to the lowest elevation
on the property
Ctaflfy the requests for bUlldmg height The architectural elevations are shOWing a theme with a Not Met
35 foot line Has the request for bUilding height changed?
CaseCondltons
Pflnt Date 02/07/2005
Page 3 of 3
--
.
"
FAX COVER MEMO
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
100 S. MYRTLE AVE., 2nd Floor
CLEARW A TER, FL 33756
(727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562..4865
TO:~-e,I'+h z,oit;o
FAX: 7 q :3 - q 5
Phone:
FROM:
~hn ~
Phone:
DATE: Od-.O 7 05
SUBJEcr: :~:~~~~
~1}/t~t~-i r:4:iY^/W'J~ '
MESSAGE:~,o. XA ~
NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE)
SEt,1[) IHG REPORT
Feb 07 2005 10 14RM
YOUR LOGO
YOUR FRX 1'10
Clt~OfClearwater-Plan Dept
727 562 4865
NO OTHER FACSIMILE
01 '37939855
START TIME USRGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT
Feb.07 10 09AM 02'52 SND 04 OK
TO T\JRN OFF RfflORT. PRESS · MENU' **04.
~ SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'.
I
I
FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE. PLEASE CALL 1-800--t-RPjFAX (435-7329),
I
I
I
I
I
..
,..
Keith Zayac & Associates. Inc.
CIvil Englneenng, Landscape Architecture, Planmng
701 S Enterpnse Road E, Ste 404
Safety Harbor, FL 34695
(727) 793-9888 Phone
(727) 793-9855 Fax
kerth@kelthzavac com
January 11, 2005
Mr John Schodtler
City of Clearwater
100 S Myrtle Ave
Clearwater, FL 33756
ORIG!~\! 1\ L
II \; \
RE: 300 PALM BLUFF ST.; FLS 2004-09064
Dear Mr Schodtler
Enclosed please find 8 sets of revised plans addressing staff comments regarding thiS
project Including the folloWing
ZONING CONDITION
1 A note has been added to the grading and draInage plan calling for the facllrtles
to be underground
2 The ISR calculations for each IndIVIdual lot have been added to the site plan
3 A note has been added to the srte plan regarding Installation of the streets pnor
to recording the final plat
LANDSCAPE
1 The plant list has been revised to Include all plants
2 The plants at the SE comer have been labeled
3 We propose that the trees to be planted on IndIVIdual lots Will be done along
with the constructIon of the Individual homes to avoid damage If planted pnor to
homes We request that thiS be a condition of approval
4 The canopies of all trees to remain have been delineated and darkened
STORMWATER CONDITION
1 A stormwater easement has been plqced over the outfall pipe
~\
j
OR\G\NAL
SOLID WASTE CONDITION
1 A note has been added to the plans that the solid waste Will be provided by roll
out containers Access Will be provided through the main entrance gate and
secondary emergency gate to aVOId a truck turn around area In this small
subdivIsIon
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
1 The srte distance tnangles have been added to Intersections and dnveways
excluding the secondary emergency gate that Will not be used for general
access Objects Within the mangles have been reduced In height as noted on
the site plan
2 A pedestnan gate has been graphically shown at the main entrance gate
ZONING CONDITION
~R1Ga~ for the Individual lots have been added to the site plan
2 BUilding elevations are currently being revised and will be submitted under
separate cover by the project architect
@1 Attached IS a wntten response supporting how the charactenstlcs of the
requested Increased bUilding heights conform to the surrounding neighborhood,
along WIth dimensioned photographs of surrounding building heights
~ Attached IS a wntten response supporting the charactenstlcs of the proposed
fence heIghts and setbacks conform to the surrounding neighborhood, along
WIth dimensioned photographs of surrounding walls and fences
@? A preliminary engineers opinion of cost IS Included
<67 Attached IS a written response supporting how the charactenstlcs of the
requested reduced setbacks conform to the surrounding neighborhood, along
with dimensioned photographs of surrounding bUildings
I ,
C; L----
Zayac, P E , RLA
Pr ent
Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc
~
Should have comments back by Friday or Monday Your last resubmlttal was Thursday, January
27, 2005 and I give one week for the ORe members to review and get their comments back to
me
-~mOnglnal Me5sage----~
From: Keith Zayac [mallto kelth@kelthzayac com)
Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 20055.42 PM
To: Schodtler, John
Subject: Palm Bluff
John do you have anything for me from the review of this proJect?
Keith E Zayac, P E , RLA
Keith Zayac & AssocIates, lnc
701 Enterprise Road E , Ste 404
Safety Harbor, FL 34695
727 ~ 793-9888 phone
727-793-9855 fax
>
10/11/2004 15'27 7277?i~?='
"\
,~
Keith Zayac & AssOtiates. Inc.
Civil Engineering, Landsc8pe Architecture, Planning
fM TRA~'MITT AL
,
DATE: October 11, ft04
TO: JohnSc~,r&&2~76
FROM: Keith zayac
RE:
Total hU":
ZAYAC
,
--4
PAGE 01
70 I Enterprise Road E , Ste 404
Safety Harbor. FL 34695
(727) 793-9888 PhQoe
(727) 793-9855 Fax
keith@);.etthzayac,com
{O). [E ~ [E 0 W [E finl
1\ID OCT 1--2 - IUD
OEV8.0PMENT SERVICES oEPT
erN Of ~RWATER
'1~ cr ~~
Scott Rice IS out until Thursday and I am waiting to hear back from him on whether or not all of
his departments have made their comments
Thursday IS ORe
Most likely comments will be faxed to you on Monday, unless I get them back earlier and have
time to fax them to you
-----anginal Messagen---
From: Keith Zayac [mallto'kelth@kelthzayac com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2005 12 24 PM
To: Schodtler, John
Subject: Re' Plans for FL52004-09064 300 Palm Bluff St
John when do you think we will received comments Also please make Bennett aware
that these are three and four car garages so parking should be m excess
Keith E Zayac, P E, RLA
KeIth Zayac & ASSOCiates, Inc
701 Enterpnse Road E , Ste 404
Safety Harbor, FL 34695
727-793-9888 phonc
727-793-9855 fax
----- Ongmal Message -----
~JohnSchodtlmr@ mvClearwater com
~~
~~-- -
Jflddler@aol com
-~
Sent Monday, January 24,2005323 PM
Subject RE Plans for FLS2004-09064 300 Palm Bluff St
The representative resubmitted plans last week and yes they did move the front
setbacks back from Palm Bluff and Osceola Ave
They did not reduce the number of units from their anginal request (8 total)
The road access has not changed from the ongll1al request The parking and trafftc
access IS reviewed by Bennet! Elba, Traffic Englneenng 562-4775
They are still askmg for 40' In height
-----anginal Message-----
From: Jfiddler@aol com [mallto.Jfiddler@aol com]
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 1 03 PM
To: 5chodtler, John, WI5NELLC@aol com
Subject: Plans for FLS2004-09064 300 Palm Bluff 5t
Hello John,
Could you please give me a call and let me know what IS gOIng on
at the project at 300 Palm Bluff Street Have new plans been
submitted? Has the access roads In and out been established?
Has the density changed? Are there updated plans that I might
have access to?
I understand that the setbacks have been changed I have no
problems with the rest of the project concerning heights I am stili
concerned about the matter of traffic and parking on Palm Bluff
Street and would like very much to talk the person responsIble for
that part
Thanks, John Ware
303 Palm Bluff Street
Clearwater, FL 33755
727 443-0375
Iflddler@aol com
.J
Keith Zayac & Associates.. Inc.
CivIl Engmeenng, Landscape ArchItecture, Planning
701 Enterpnse Road E , Ste 404
Safety Harbor, FL 34695
(727) 793-9888 Phone
(727) 793-9855 Fax
kelth@kelthzayac com
TO:
John Schodtler
City of Clearwater Plannmg Department
100 S Myrtle Ave
Clearwater, FL 33756
DATE:
JOB#:
RE:
January 26, 2005
334-04
Palm Bluff SubdivIsion
WE ARE SENDING YOU THE FOLLOWING ITEMS
[x ] Attached
[ ] Shop Drawmgs
[ ] Copy of Letter
] Under Separate Cover via
] Prints
] Change Order
F~ni=:-.lr CoUfl FIL--
[ ] Plans [ 1 Samples
[ ] Specifications [] See Below
COPIES DATE DESCRIPTION
8 ReVised Buddmg Elevations
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED As Checked Below
L ] For approval [J ReViewed, no comments
[ x] For your use [] ReViewed, comments as noted
[ ] As requested [] Returned for correctIOns
[ ] For review and comment
] Resubmit _ copies for approval
] Submit _ copies for distribution
] Return _ corrected prmts
REMARKS:
These are the elevatIOns mentIOned In my prevIous transmittal to eome under separate
cover
I CC:
I
I
I
II
II
II
1
I SIGNED:
I NAME:
II TITLE:
I Presl e
I kelth@kelthzayae eom
~
~
The representative resubmitted plans last week and yes they did move the front setbacks back
from Palm Bluff and Osceola Ave
They did not reduce the number of units from their anginal request (8 total)
The road access has not changed from the anginal request The parking and traffic access IS
reviewed by Bennett Elba, Traffic Engineering 562-4775
They are stili asking for 40' In height
-----Onglnal Messagen---
From: Jfiddler@aol com [mallto Jfiddler@aol com]
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 1 03 PM
To: Schodtler, John, WISNELlC@aol com
Subject: Plans for FLS2004-09064 300 Palm Bluff St
Hello John,
Could you please give me a call and let me know what IS gOing on at the
project at 300 Palm Bluff Street Have new plans been submitted? Has the
access roads In and out been established? Has the density changed? Are
there updated plans that I might have access to?
I understand that the setbacks have been changed I have no problems
with the rest of the project concerning heights I am stili concerned about
the matter of traffic and parking on Palm Bluff Street and would like very
much to talk the person responsible for that part
Thanks, John Ware
303 Palm Bluff Street
Clearwater, FL 33755
727443-0375
Iflddler@aol com
.
,
Page I of2
Schodtler, John
From Schad tier, John
Sent Wednesday, January 19,20051 32 PM
To' 'Jlfllansphotography@tampabay rr com'
Subject RE re palm Bluff
It IS my understanding that the developer has to show documentation that lI1dlcates the need for 40 ft
FEMA 11I1es, etc the estimate from 100kll1g at the plans appears to be that they are tryll1g to provide a
view from all of the houses A view IS not a hardship for example If they cannot prove the need for such
height, It would be my guess that you Will enforce the height restrictions already 111 place for that zonll1g
dlstnct
They have not shown how It IS supported as of yet Therefore It cannot be approved as requested
I also believe that the time for pubhc lI1put has passed I thll1k It IS 111 the hands of the Zoning Department
now Am I correct on thiS?
Yes, The DRC meetll1g was the deadline for Input I am stili takll1g Input as a courtesy, but the Input has not been
anything 111 addition to the concerns the Development Review Committee has already addressed as lI1SUfflclent
With the applicant
Thanks for your time, and please confirm the protection of the natural spnng located on said property
We certall1ly do not want to overlook thiS natural element
The plans submitted do not lI1dlcate any development In the area of the spnng The sprll1g IS not protected by the
City, however, we did address thiS concern With the applicant, as requested by several of the surroundll1g
property owners Once again, their plans show no lI1terference With the spnng
From: John Schodtler@myClearwatercom [mallto'John Schodtler@myClearwatercom]
Sent: Wednesday, January 19/2005 11.21 AM
To: Jllllansphotography@tampabay,rr com
Subject: RE re palm Bluff
They have not shown how It IS supported as of yet
-----Ong Ina I Messagenn-
From: Jill Heath [mallto'Jllltansphotography@tampabay rr com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 20059.37 AM
To: Schodtler, John
Subject: RE' re palm Bluff
They Will not get the 40ft though correct?
Fro m: John Schodtler@myClearwater com [mallto John, Schodtler@myClearwater com]
sent: Wednesday, January 19, 20057'56 AM
To: J IlIla nsphotog ra phy@tampabay,rr,com
Subject: RE re palm Bluff
1/19/2005
.
..
.
1/1912005
Page 20f2
The applicant resubmitted their plans with front setbacks adjusted from five feet to fifteen feet
They are stili seeking the forty feet In height
The spring to my knowledge Will not be affected by their proposal
n---Ongmal Message-----
From: Jill Heath [mallto'Jllllansphotography@tampabay rr com]
sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005451 PM
To: Schodtler, John
Subject: re palm Bluff
John,
How are you -hope weill
Please keep me lI1formed on the Palm Bluff developments
A concern IS also about the natural sprll1g located on that property What IS proposed to
protect thiS natural spnng?
Please adVise, Jill Heath
OCBNA
727-446-4559
Community Response Team
Planning Oept. Cases - ORC
i~
Meeting Date: 01/27/05
Case No. FLS2004-12082
LocatIon: 1490 N Belcher Rd
o Current Use' New Construction
o Active Code Enforcement Case (no)
o Address number (no)
o Landscaping (no)
o Overgrown (yes)
o DebrIS (yes)
o Inoperative vehicle(s) (no)
o BUlldmg(s) Under construction
o Fencing (none)
o Pamt (under construction)
o Grass Parking (no)
o Residential Parking Violations (no)
o Signage (none)
o Parkmg (n/a)
o Dumpster (n/a)
o Outdoor storage (yes - bUilding materials)
Comments/Status Report (attach any pertinent documents)
Date 01/18/05 Reviewed by Gabe
Revised 03-29-01 02-04-03
Telephone '-f 1 ! J
~
I
-
()
FAX CO'VER MEMO
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
100 S. MYRTLE AVE., 2nd Floor
CLEARWATER, FL 33756
(727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865
TO:--Ke.,.,-W ZAYAC-
FAX: 7Cf 3 -- QS55
Phone:
FROM: ~ h Y"'\ S. Phone:
DATE:_I;2 ;)..7 D~ SUBJECT: 300 Ptv\M t::llAlf
MESSAGE: t~~/& ~,oyY\vY\{:l~
th ~ bEr.~~ j
NUMBER OF PAGES(lNCLUDING THIS PAGE)
~
f11' ."I'Q
11~C. f1Jf~ '....
~\W....~""':.
1l!J'"~...~4 'J. \""';
:~~ --- ~-!'l:~
..~~I~ ~~;
~~\.~ ~
\.!Ifi="~~'\
"""""J. TEl\.I,1
Engineering C'dHoltlon
1) All adjacent sidewalks to be Improved to current standards including ADA
2) Solid waste trucks Will only be able to dnve main roadway Suggest a staging area for black
barrels
3) Need to show water main construction
4) Each water meter Will be set by the City All applicable fees to be paid by the applicant
5) All proposed sal1ltary service wyes to be 6-lnch not 4-lnch as shown
6) The sanitary sewage system Will be pnvately operated and maintained by the association
7) How does Lot #17, Palm Bluff SubdivIsion, gain access to their property?
8) Need to provide pedestraln access gates to eXisting nghts-of-way
9) Where do vIsitors park? (Guests, service, deltvenes, etc )
10) Need to provide pedestrtan Sidewalks along a minimum on one Side of the private streets
11) There may be additional comments based upon submittal of proposed water main location
and responses to these comments
Conditions Associated With
FLS2004-09064
300 PALM BLUFF ST
Not Met
Plat Comments
1) All easements to be dimenSioned
2) Units of length dimenSions not Identlfted
3) Need to label Ingress/egress easements
4) Need to Include a statement prohibiting access from Lots 1 - 2- 3 to Osceola and from Lots 3-
4 - 5 - 6 to Palm Bluff
5) Need a drainage easement for pond on private property and that portion of the pond being
being constructed within common area
6) Need easements for gate controls, power, etc on Lots 1 - 5 - 6
Prior to bUilding permit, record final plat with Plnellas County
Fire Condition
Joe Colbert
562-4567 xt 3548
1 0/22/2004
Entry gates must open to the entire Width of the roadway for Emergency Vehicle access An
Emergency Vehicle Access System must be Installed In gate and comply with Plnellas County
Ordinance # 98-4 PLEASE ACKNOWLEDGE
Not Met
Landscape Site Triangle Cond Arden Dittmer 562-4604
10/25/2004 Landscape Plan does not show the sight trtangles as descrtbed In Article 3, DIVISion 9, revise the
plan to show these tnangles at all the street and dnveway Intersecttons
Not all are shown
Not Met
Landscape Site Tnangle Plan Arden Dittmer 562-4604
10/25/2004 Per Section 3-1204 H Plants In the sight trtangles must be Installed In accordance with the
requirements In Article 3, DIvIsion 9 to minimize trafftc hazards
U There are two "SN" and one "QV" which Will create vIsibility problems as they mature
Not Met
Landscape Perimeter Condltl Arden Dittmer 562-4604
1 0/25/2004 PI a n does not meetlhe req Ul re ments of pertm eter plantlngs In Code Section 3-1202 0
U 10 foot buffer required from street right of ways
Not Met
Landscape
10/25J2004
Arden Dittmer 562-4604
There are a few errors on the plan Please correct and resubmit for review Not Met
1 Plant list IS missing a few plants shown on plan
2 Plants on SE corner are not labeled
CaseCondltons
Pnnt Date 12/27/2004
Page 1 of 3
Landscape
10/25/2004
FLS2004-09064
300 PALM BLUFF ST
Arden Dittmer 562-4604
3 Check the number of trees on each parcel vs the required number based on the lot area
respectIVely
The eXisting canopies of ALL trees must be shown The plan does nol show ALL of them Please Not Met
darken slightly to cJanfy and somehow differentiate the canopies of trees proposed to remam from
those to be removed
11/09/2004
land Resource Condition
Rick Albee
562-4741
11/09/2004
11/09/2004
Provide a Tree Preservation Plan prepared by a certified arboflst, consultmg arboflst, landscape Not Met
architect or other specialist m the field of arborlculture This plan must show how the proposed
bUilding, parkmg, stormwater and utilities Impact the cntlcal root zones (dnp lines) of tree to be
preserved and how you propose to address these Impacts Ie, crown elevating, bUlldmg lintels, root
prunmg and/or root aeratlon systems Other data reqUired on this plan must show the trees
canopy line, actual tree barricade limits (2/3 of the drip line and/or m the root prune lines If
reqUired), and the tree barricade detail And any other pertmen! Information the arboflst feels
relates to tree preservation Provide prior to bUilding permit
Reroute the sanitary lateral away from tree #14 pnor to DONat Met
Reroute the water main away from tree #61 pnor to 0 0 Not Met
SFR Recreation Impact Fee
A Recreation Facility Impact fee of $1,400 IS due prior to bUilding permit Issuance or final plat (If
applicable) whichever occurs first Contact Deb Richter at 727-562-4817 If questions
Not Met
Bob Maran
562-4592
1 0/19/2004
Storm Water ConditIOn
Not Met
Pnor to D 0 the plan IS to s how a 15 foot d ra Inag e easement over the proposed 15" storm pi pe
for dramage from Sunset Onve and easemant IS to be dedicated to the City of Clearwater
Prior to Issuance of a bUilding permit the followmg Items are to be addressed
1) A double nng Inflltrometer test IS to be performed at the retention pond showmg a 24 hour
recovery time
2) PrOVide garage floor elevations for all the homes and show that In a 100yr storm that they Will
not flood ThiS concern IS for a storm event and IS mdependent of FEMA storm surge reqUirement
Solid Waste Condition Initials MISSing Initials MISSing
10/25/2004 ExpJall1 how solid waste & recycling be Will handled, need truck turn around area Please contact Not Met
Bob Cantrell 727-224-7392
TraffiC Eng Condition Bennett Elbo 562-4775
10/27/2004 1 Show 20' x 20' Sight distance tnangle at all dnveways and intersections The triangles are Not Met
measured from the property line per (City of Clearwater's Land Development Code) Objects
Within the Sight distance tnangles must not exceed 30" 111 height from the pavement
2 The face of gate must be 20' from the back of Sidewalk
3 Provide a pedestrian gate to the site which must be acceSSible to the disabled and Internal
Sidewalks
4 All of the above to be addressed prior to 0 0
.. TraffiC Impact Fee to be determined and paid prior CO
Zonmg Condition John Schodtler 562-4604
10/07/2004 PrOVide ImperviOus Surface Ration (ISR) calculations for each mdlvlduallot ReSidential Urban
Not Met
CaseCondllons
Pnnt Date 12/27/2004
Page 2 of 3
FLS2004-09064
300 PALM BLUFF ST
Zoning CondItion John Schodtler 562-4604
land use reqUires each lot meet 065 ISR
1 0/11/2004 Resu bm It bu Ildl ng elevations Provld e dimensions Incl ud Ing base flood, maxim u m bu lid Ing
height, etc
10/11/2004
10/11/2004
10/18/2004
11/02/2004
Provide eVidence supporting how the characteristics of the requested Increased bUilding heights
are characteristic of other structures In the surrounding neighborhood Photographs with
dimensions are acceptable
Provide eVidence supporting how the characteristics of the fence heights and setbacks are
characteristic of other fence structures In the surrounding neighborhood Photographs With
dimensions and/or surverys are acceptable
Provide estimated project value
Provide eVidence supporting how the characteristics of the requested reduced front setbacks are
characteflshc of other structures m the surroundmg neighborhood Photographs With dimensions
and/or surverys or a block survey are acceptable
Print Date 12/27/2004
Page 3 of 3
Not Me!
Not Met
Not Met
Not Met
Not Met
CaseCondltons
~
':::Hm Il IG REF'[lRT
NO. OTHER FACSIMILE
01 97939855
I
YOUR LOGO
YOUR FRX NO
DEe 27 2004 10 44RM
Clt~OfClearwater-Plan Dept
727 552 4855
STRRT TIME USRGE TIME MODE PRGES RESULT
Dec.27 10 42RM 02'25 SND 04 OK
TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' 004.
lHEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '~'.
FOR FRX FlDVANTRGE ASSISTRNCE. PLEASE: CALL 1-BOO-HELP-FRX (435-7329).
...
~
".
MICHAEL C BERRY & ASSOCIATES, P A
Attorneys and Counselors at Law
1106 N Fort Ha1f1son Avenue, SUite I
Clearwater, FL 33755
Telephone 727/447-0533
FacslInlle 727/446-3033
E-maIl mcber'1,@bel}ylaw com
Web www be} rvlaw com
November 12, 2004
John Schodtier, Plailllcr I
City of Clearwater Planmng Department
MUniCipal Servlccs BUlldmg
100 South Myrtle Ave
Clearwater, Flonda 33756
RE 300 Palm Bluff Street (FLS 2004-09064) Flexible Standard Development Approval
Dear Mr Sehodtler
I am the owner of two properties which WIll be Impacted by the above development, 1106
N F0l1 Hamson and 405 Palm Bluff The development concept presented IS a welcome addItion
to the neIghborhood The attempt to ClUm a lot of square footage of stJ ucture mto the property
seems a bIt high 111 that the setbacks are virtually non-exIstent I hopc that the City ofCleal\vatel
and the developer can find a happy medIUm to allow the proJcct to move forward Pomts made
at the heanng today concernmg the VISitor parkmg would most lIkely be lemedIed by setback
enhancement creatmg a pmkmg area
On another note, I have heard about a "Homeowner's ASSOCiatIon" for this area before I
would lIke to pomt out that thelc has never been a "Homeowner's ASSOCiatIon" that has
lepresented me or some of the other properties m the mea I have not met thc alleged
I epresentatIves, been notIced or mVI ted to any meetmgs or been asked to support any of thelr
views The pIoperhes I own are 110t subject to any homeowner assocIatIOn's nghts or pnvlleges
It appears to be a pnvate lobbymg orgamzatlOl1, which IS fine, and they are entItled to their
opmlOl1S as well as the rest of us But please do not take their commcnts as "arca
repIesentatIves" A pelson's fundamental constItutIOnal fight to use lus or hel land IS a
yh"pJ"lshcd thmg under the Idw and ,:;hould not be tampered w1th unless It 1':; a safety or health
problem or publIc nUIsance Zonll1g should not be unduly restnchve wlllch IS undoubtedly why
there IS the Flexible Development ReView process I recogmze lt 1':i ddficult for the CIty of
Clearwater to keep everyone happy I Wish you and your staff the best and hope thiS mea wlil
finally be developed The CIty of Clearwater has sufTered due to the absence of posItIve,
forward thll1kll1g development
l!f~ii~n. --!E-rnl
,I dU t ~ J 1 fl , U
J I
Respectful]},
/I (~j{J,..&j /
Michael C Betry, Sr
PLANI\J!N ~ DEVelOPMENT SVC8
_-!:~1"'v 0~ ClEAPWArER
~
..
~
Schodtler, John
Page 1 of I
From
Sent
To
Subject
Robin Lee [rlee7@tampabay rr com]
Thursday, November 11,2004 1 05 PM
Schodtler, John
Oceola development
Dear Mr Schodtler,
I was given your e-maIl so as I mIght ask you about thIS meetmg wIth
the City of Clearwater concernmg thIS proposed development gomg m
off Oceola I cannot attend the meetmg, personally, but from what I
understand we aren't allowed to speak anyways
I am not happy with this development plan it appears they have expandcd this proJcct to
mclude more homes than were dIscussed at our neighborhood meetmg I
am especIally unhappy wIth the propo5.ed plan for one of the entrances
to thiS "development" commg off Sunset and Engman Streets I have
lIVed here, m thIS home, at the comer ofthese two streets, 300
(Engman), for almost 22 years and feel the amount of traffic thiS
httle proposed commumty would IllICit to be totally mappropnate for
thiS area When you conSider each of these homes havmg at least two
cars, then add the cars of theIr VIsItors & guests, theIr servIce
people and theIr vehicles, repair trucks-all thIS to say the least, IS
Just too much I thlllk It unfair that we may have to forfeit the peace
and qUIet of our spot III thiS neIghborhood to accommodate the needs of
thIS developer
Slllcerely,
Robm Lee
300 Engman Street
Clearwater, Flonda
11/12/2004
Page I of I
Schodtler, John
From
Sent
To
Subject
Importance
Jill Heath [Jllllansphotography@tampabay rr com]
Thursday, November 11, 2004 1030 AM
Schodtler, John
Re Palm Bluff
High
John,
The new developers of 303 Palm Bluff have shown us a v1sually stunn1ng render1ng as
an example of the type of home proposed there However, the var1ance requests do
not stay w1th1n the current development code and are unacceptable for our
ne1ghborhood
The OCBNA held a meet1ng on Monday, 11/8/04, and the proposed development was
d1scussed OCBNA 1S 1n agreement w1th the letter subm1tted to your department by
Jon Ware regard1ng th1S proposed development The most cr1t1cal 1ssues regard1ng
th1S proposed development are as follows
1) The he1ght var1ance should not exceed 30 feet Th1S 1S cons1stent
w1th the ne1ghborhood development code
2) The setbacks are requ1red to be a m1n1mum of 25 feet and must
stay w1th1n these gU1del1nes
These var1ances to the C1ty'S development code and our ne1ghborhood are
unacceptable and OCBNA w1ll not support the proposed development as currently
subm1tted We look forward to hear about your response to our concerns
slncerely,
J1ll Heath
OCBNA pres1dent
11/12/2004
Schodtler, John
Page I of I
From
Sent
To
Subject
Schodtler, John
F rid ay, Nove mber 12, 2004 8 09 AM
'J 1IIIa nsphotog ra phy@lampabay rr com'
RE Palm Bluff
1) The he~ght var~ance should not exceed 30 feet Th~s ~s cons~stent
w~th the ne~ghborhood development code I agree w~th your concern
2) The setbacks are requ~red to be a m~n~mum of 25 feet
stay w~th~n these gu~del~nes The maJor~ty of the homes ~n
eXlst today at less than a twenty-f~ve foot front setbacks
has not Just~f~ed the~r setback requests as of yet
11112/2004
and must
your ne~ghborhood
The appl~cant
N6'vember 10, 2004
Jolm and Geneva Ware
303 Palm Bluff Street
Clearwater, FI 33755
727443-0375 ifiddler@aol com
RE' Planned development at 300 Palm BluffSt. (FLS2004-09064)
To' John Schodtler - CIty of Clearwater Planmng Department
TIns is m response to the planned development, winch is located directly north of our
three propertIes at 303,309 and 311 Palm Bluff Street. We have found concerns about
the plan in the followmg areas
I) Too many umts for the area. Greater density than any of the sUIToundmg
neIghborhood. We feel that our block of Palm Bluff would become a "wall" of
concrete interrupted only by garages and a main entrance The many zero proposed
setbacks would only add to this feelmg of congestIon
2) The only fulltnne entrance to the property would be on Palm Bluff Street This IS
far too much traffic for our bttle street We feel like at the very least there should
be a full tune entrance on Osceola and Sunset Dnve to have more access With the
only entrance bemg on Palm Bluff the overflow parkIng would fill up our street
We find tlus totally unacceptable.
3) The height vanance should not exceed 30 feet This IS consistent WIth the
neIghborhood code
4) We are agamst all zero setbacks on proposed lots 4,5,6 and 7. I have enclosed a Itst
of the vanances we do not accept.
Thank you for tins opportunIty to express our thoughts We would welcome responsible
development of tlus neIghborhood but feel lIke tlus is not a realIstic approach. We are
open to new Ideas and would like to see the development continue in some other manneroPlease keep us informed.
S~t~~
John: and Geneva Ware
~
. ReductIOn III setbacks and mcrease III bUl1dme he]Q:ht are as follows
Flexlb]e Standard Develovment Cntena
Proposed Setbacks Required Proposed Bldg. Required Bldg Ht.
Setbacks Ht
LOT #1 o 00 FT PVMT (WEST) 15-25 FT FRONT 443FT(l) 30 FT MAX
3 00 Ff WALL (EAST) 15-25 FT FRONT
150FT BLDG (EAST) 15-25 IT FRONT
5 00 IT BLOG (NORTH) 5 FT SIDE
o 00 FT PVMT (NORTH 5 IT SIDE
5 00 FT BLOG SOUTH 15-25 IT FRONT
o 00 FT PVMT SOUTH 15-25 FT FRONT
LOT #2 o 00 FT PVMT WEST) 15-25 FT FRONT 403FT (2) 30 IT MAX
3 00 IT WALL (EAST) ] 5-25 IT FRONT
15 00 FT BLOG (EAST) 15-25 FT FRONT
5 00 FT BLDG SOUTH ] 5-25 FT FRONT
o 00 IT PVMT SOUTH 15-25 FT FRONT
o 00 FT PVMT NORTH) 15-25 IT FRONT
5 00 FT BLOG NORTH) ] 5-25 IT FRONT 1..- ~
LOT #3 o 00 FT PVMT WEST) 15-25 IT FRONT 4] 0 FT (I) \l 30 FT MAX
5 25 FT BLOG EAST) 15-25 FT FRONT
300 FT WALL EAST) , / 15-25 FT FRONT)
o 00 FT PVMT (NORTH) 5 FT SIDE
LOT #4 000 FT PVMT WEST) ( 5 IT SIDE J fI 430FT (I) 11 30 FT MAX
000 FT PVMT (EAST) 5 FT SIDE ")
o 00 FT PVMT (NORTH) ] 5-25 FT FRONT
2000 IT BLDG (NORTH) ] 5-25 FT FRONT
5 00 FT BLDG (SOUnD ' 15-25 FT FRONT )
300FT WALL SOUTH) 15-25 FT FRONT 1
LOT #5 o 00 FT PVMT WEST) 15-25 Ff FRONT") 310FT (2) 30 IT MAX
17 50 FT BLOG (WEST) 15-25 FT FRONT
o 00 FT PVMT EAST) 5 IT SIDE
o 00 FT PVMT NORTH) 15.25 FT FRONT
o 00 IT PVMT SOUTH 15-25 IT FRONT
150FT BLOG SOUTH 15-25 FT FRONT
3 00 FT WALL ( SOUTH J ] 5-25 FT FRONT 1
LOT #6 o 00 IT PVMT WEST) 5 FT SIDE 3]OIT(2) 30 FT MAX
o 00 FT PVMT (EAST) ( ] 5-25 FT FRONT,')
17 89 FT BLOG (EAST) 15-25 FT FRONT"
] 8 05 FT BLOG (SOUTH) 15-25 IT FRONT
o 00 FT PVMT (SOUTH) ( ] 5-25 FT FRONT ),
3 00 FT WALL (SOUTH) ( 15-25 FT FRONT '1
o 00 FT PVMT (NORTH) 15-25 FI fRONT -
LOT #7 2 00 FT PVMT (EAST) tr 5 FT SIDE '1l 260FT (2) 30 IT MAX
10 ]2 FT BLOG (NORTH) 5-15 FT-R.Ej(R
3 00 FT WALL (SOUTH) f15-25 FT FRONT i,
17 40 FT BLOG SOUTH) 15-25 IT FRONT
LOT #8 o 00 FT PVMT WEsn t5-25 IT fRONT 21 0 IT (2) 30 FT MAX
o 00 FT PVMT ( EAST) 15-25 FT FRONT
o 00 FT PVMT ( NORTH) 5 FT SIDE
10 00 FT (NORTH) 5 FT SlOE
*NOTE
(1) BLDG HT IS FROM GRADE TO
FLAT ROOF TOP
(2) BLOG HI IS FROM FEMA
FLOOD LINE TO ROOF TOP
. 60 FTHIGH WALL VARIANCE FROM 36 INCH WALL
e
e
November 8, 2004
Re: Notice offilIng of an applicatwnfor flexIble standard development
approval at 300 Palm Bluff St (FLS2004-09064)
To John Schodtler
I would like to address my concerns wIth the proposed plans. 1 own 1212
Sunset Dr This area in my OpInlOn has historzcal value ( my house was
built in 1918) My property was purchasedfor a $lmilllOn, I have taken
great care and a lot of money to bring this house back to its orzgInal
grandeur 1 would like to see that whole area come back and am willing to
do this The proposal as It is wlll Increased congestlOn around the property
The property IS changingfor higher end homes not track housmg, which 1
thInk this would do. The eXIsting zoning on the property does not offer any
hardship to the area
I feel that the currant proposal has not shown a warrant for a hardship in
the area or densIty hardship The property can easily be developedfor the
current 5 structures wIth no problem increasmg the density to 8 lots only
puts more money into the hands of the developer (whlch IS not a basIs of
hardship) but rather puts the hardship onto the commumty thru the needfor
Increased mumcipal servIces and once agam added congestion
Thankyou for this opportumty to allow me to gIve my views
Smcerely,
Peaches Pook
1212 Sunset Dr.
\
1\
Page 1 of I
Schodtler, John
From
Sent
To
Subject
Importance
Alex Schoenherr [decaI21x@yahoo com]
Monday, November 08,2004630 AM
Schodtler, John
[BULK] 300 Palm Bluff variance (FLS2004-09064)
Low
I resIde at 1402 Sunset Dnve, approx 6 houses North of the proposed development I have lIved III this
neighborhood for Just short of 20 years now r am happy to see development on this property but I am
agamst the proposed use of the property to contam 8 lots with 8 houses The set back changes I am
opposed to, some of them, but not all 1 am particularly opposed to the change of the setback
reqUIrements of the PVMT from either 000 or 2 00 versus the normal 15-20 or 5 ft III the case oflot #7
The other setbacks are a matter of chOIce (although 1 disagree with them also) because they will have to
be lived with by whoever buys mto their development, but the other setbacks affect me as a resldel1t of
the neIghborhood I also do not thmk that the flat roof deSign they propose IS a great Idea, but I do 110t
thmks that IS part of the vanance asked for, but I thll1k It IS essel1tml to the Idea oftrYl11g to squeeze 8
lots onto that piece of property I do agree With the vanance of the wall heIght beIng asked for from 3
feet to 6 feet I thll1k that Will enhance the pnvacy ofthClr community, somethl11g that the people paYl11g
mIllions of dollars for those homes should be able to have given their expense to get It We stIll have a
neighborhood that contall1S allot ofless than honest people and thiS IS one way to dIscourage those
mdlvIduals from havmg free reign Please feel free to contact me If you have any further questions as to
my posItIon
Alcx Schoenherr
1402 Sunset Dnve
Clearwatcr, FI 3375
(727) 447-7505- Home
11/8/2004
November 10, 2004
Page I of2
Schodtler, John
From JOHN WARE []flddler1@venzon net]
Sent Wednesday, November 10,20041 15 PM
To Schodtler, John
Cc Jllhansphotography@tampabay rr com
Subject 300 Palm Bluff Proposed Development
November 10,2004
John and Geneva Ware
303 Palm Bluff Street
Clearwater, FI 33755
727 443-0375 jfiddler@aol com
RE: Planned development at 300 Palm Bluff St. (FLS2004-09064)
To: John Schodtler - City of Clearwater Planmng Department
ThiS IS In response to the planned development, which IS located directly north of our
three properties at 303, 309 and 311 Palm Bluff Street We have found concerns about
the plan In the followmg areas:
1) Too many umts for the area Greater density than any of the surroundIng
neighborhood. We feel that our block of Palm Bluff would become a "wall" of
concrete mterrupted only by garages and a mam entrance The many zero proposed
setbacks would only add to thiS feelmg of congestion.
2) The only fulltIme entrance to the property would be on Palm Bluff Street ThiS 1S
far too much traffic for our httle street We feel hke at the very least there should
be a full time entrance on Osceola and Sunset Dnve to have more access. With the
only entrance bemg on Palm Bluff the overflow parkIng would fill up our street.
We find thiS totally unacceptable.
3) The height vanance should not exceed 30 feet ThIS IS conS1stent With the
neIghborhood code
4) We are agamst all zero setbacks on proposed lots 4,5,6 and 7 T have enclosed a Itst
of the vanances we do not accept.
Thank you for thiS opportumty to express our thoughts. We would welcome responsIble
development of thIS neIghborhood but feel hke thIS 1 s not a realIstIc approach Weare
open to new Ideas and would hke to see the development contInue m some other manner.
11/10/2004
Page 1 of I
, ,
Schodtler, John
From Schodtler, John
Sent Wednesday, November 10, 2004 914 AM
To 'Jilliansphotography@tampabay rr com'
Subject RE re palm bluff
Jill,
The meeting IS scheduled to start at 9 20am
Please be aware this IS not a public heanng and the diScussion will primarily be between the applicant and the
City Staff due to the limited time we have to handle all of the cases gOing to the board
I recommend you put your concerns Into an emal] or a letter and provide It to me prior to the meeting Friday
This will allow me to take all of the neighboring concerns and pose them to the applicant dUring the meeting
This saves lots of time while In the meeting
John Schodtler
-----Onglnal Message-nn
From: JIll Heath [malJto Jllllansphotography@tampabay,rr,com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 20048 59 AM
To: Schodtler, John
Subject: re palm bluff
HI John,
The QCBNA IS very concerned about the Vanance requests for Palm Bluff The meeting as I understand
IS Fnday the 12th, time? We would like to attend Could you please e-mail the Information on this
meeting?
Thanks, Jill Heath
727 -446-4559
Jillian's
Photography
I III 0/2004
Page I of I
Schodtler, John
From
Sent
To
Subject
Jill Heath [Jilliansphotography@tampabay rr com]
Wednesday, November 10, 2004 919 AM
Schodtler, John
RE re palm bluff
Thanks, John I will get that to you by tomorrow
Jill
From: John Schodtler@myClearwater,com [mallto John Schodtler@myClearwater.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 20049 14 AM
To: Jllliansphotography@tampabay,rr com
Subject: RE re palm bluff
Jill,
The meeting IS scheduled to start a19 20am
Please be aware this IS not a public hearing and the discussion will pnmanly be between the appl1cant and the
City Staff due to the limited time we have 10 handle all of the cases gOing to the board
I recommend you put your concerns Into an emall or a letter and provide It to me prior to the mee1lng Friday
ThiS Will allow me 10 take all of the nelghbonng concerns and pose them to the applicant dUring the meeting
ThiS saves lots of time while In the meeting
John Schodtler
nmOnglnal Message-~m
From: Jill Heath [malltoJllllansphotography@tampabay.rr com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 20048.59 AM
To: 5chodtler, John
Subject: re palm bluff
HI John,
The OCBNA IS very concerned about the Variance requests for Palm Bluff The meeting as I understand
IS Fnday the 12til, time? We would like to attend Could you please e-mail the information on thiS
meeting?
Thanks, Jill Heath
727-446-4559
Jillian's
Photography
11/10/2004
it';.""'-'
,\~"'~j,::~;:..-~
. ~{'!~
~'~..,\I;< 7 \"':'
~C"l>.~ :'III~"
"r::~~ <e:::)"
':......~ -s.:'
~~-- "'~'
~~~~~m~;.'l
Parks & Rec act Fees
A RecreatIon Facility Impact fee of $1,400 IS due prior to fmal plat Contact Deb Richter at
727-562-4817 If questions
Conditions Associated With
PL 12004-00014
300 PALM BLUFF ST
Zomng Condition John Schodller '562-4604
11/02/2004 All utility facIlities and s tormwater d ra In age faCilities are req UI red to be I nsta lied u nd ergrou nd
11/02/2004
Provide Impervious Surface Ration (ISR) calculations for each Individual Jot ReSidential Urban
land use reqUires each lot meet 0 65 ISR
All curbs, gutters and base matenals for all streets, whether public or pnvate be Installed pnor to
the recordmg of the final plat
11102/2004
Pnnt Date 11/05/2004
Page 1 of 1
Not Met
Not Met
Not Me!
Not Met
CaseCondltons
Landscape
10/25/2004
10/25/2004
FLS2004-09064
300 PALM BLUFF ST
Arden Dittmer
562-4604
There are a few errors on the plan Please correct and resubmit for review Not Met
1 Plant list IS missing a few plants shown on plan
2 Plants on SE corner are not labeled
3 Check the number of trees on each parcel vs the required number based on the lot area
respectively
The eXisting canopies of ALL trees must be shown The plan does not show ALL of them Please Not Met
darken slightly to clarify and somehow differentiate the canopies of trees proposed to remam from
those to be removed
SFR Recreation Impact Fee
A Recreation FacIlity Impact fee of $1,400 IS due prior to bUlldmg permit Issuance or fmal plat (If
applicable) whichever occurs first Contact Deb Richter at 727-562-4817 If questions
10/19/2004
Storm Water Condition
562-4592
Bob Maran
Prior to D 0 the plan IS to show a 15 foot dral nage easement over the proposed 15" s term pi pe
for dramage from Sunset Drive and easemant IS to be dedicated to the City of Clearwater
Prior to Issuance of a bUilding permit the followmg Items are to be addressed
1) A double ring Inflltrometer test IS to be periormed al the retention pond showmg a 24 hour
recovery time
2) Provide garage floor elevations for all the homes and show that m a 100yr storm that they Will
not flood ThiS concern IS for a storm event and IS mdependent of FEMA storm surge requirement
Solid Waste Condition
Explam how solid waste & recyclmg Will handled, need truck turn around area
TraffiC Eng Condition Bennett Elbo 562-4775
10/27/2004 1 Show 20' X 20' Sight distance triangle at all driveways and Intersections The triangles are
measured from the property line per (City of Clearwater's Land Development Code) Objects
wlthm the Sight distance triangles must not exceed 30" m height from the pavement
2 The face of gate must be 20' from the back of Sidewalk
3 PrOVide a pedestrian gate to the site which must be accessible to the disabled and mternal
Sidewalks
4 All of the above to be addressed prior to 0 0
* TraffiC Impact Fee to be determmed and paid prior C 0
Zoning ConditIOn John Schodtler 562-4604
10/07/2004 PrOVide ImperviOus Suriace Ration (ISR) calculations for each mdlvlduallot ReSidential Urban
land use reqUires each lot meet 0 65 ISR
10/11/2004
10/11/2004
10/11/2004
Resubmit bUilding elevations PrOVide dimenSions Including base flood, maximum bUilding
height, etc
PrOVide eVidence supportmg how the characteristics of the requested Increased bUilding heights
are characteristic of other structures In the surrounding neighborhood Photographs With
dimenSions are acceptable
PrOVide eVidence supportmg how the characteristics of the fence heights and setbacks are
characteristic of other fence structures m the surrounding neighborhood Photographs With
dimenSions and/or surverys are acceptable
Print Date 11/05/2004
Page 2 of 3
Not Met
Not Met
Not Met
Not Met
Not Met
Not Met
Not Met
Not Met
CaseCondltons
~ I I ..
FLS2004~09064
300 PALM BLUFF ST
Zonmg ConditIOn John Schodtler
10/18/2004 Provide estimated project value
562-4604
11/02/2004
Provide eVidence supporting how the characteristics of the requested reduced front setbacks are
characteristic of other structures In the surrounding neighborhood Photographs with dimensions
and/or surverys or a block survey are acceptable
Pn nt Date 11/05/2004
Page 3 of 3
Not Met
Not Met
CaseCondltons
~ {~!~1' ;e~:: 'I" rwater
rlrll,1 ",,-_~-.0-
>-11',,\ ,< "~'i
, .
I:-- ~_ ~ _ III
o
FAX COVER MEMO
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
100 S. MYRTLE AVE., 2nd Floor
CLEARWATER, FL 33756
(727) 562..4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865
To:-Ji~ Z~
FAX: 7'1?" '1~ 55
Phone:
FROM: <:sO \-a 1"\ ~
DATE: , I 0"," ~ t./
Phone:
SUBJECT: "'P~C ~-~ r-
300 p~~~ 3t.
MESSAGE:
NUMHER OF PAGES(INCl,UOING THIS PAGE)
SEHD 11'1[1 REPORT
Nov 05 2004 11.44AM
YOUR LOGO
YOUR FAX NO
Clt~OfC1EarwatEr-Plan Dept
727 562 4865
NO OTHER FACSIMILE
01 97939855
START TIME USRGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT
Nov.05 11 42AM 01'58 SND 04 OK
TO TURN OFF ReJORT, PRESS · MENU' **04.
THB>I SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'.
FOR FRX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE. PLEASE CALL l-BOO---t-laP-FRX (435-7329)
Page ] of I
Schodtler, John
From
Sent
To
Subject
Schodtler, John
Wednesday, November 03, 2004 12 36 PM
'J 1IIIa nsphotogra phy@tampabay rr com'
RE HI John
With regards to denSity the subject property will support eleven dwelling units total
The applicant IS asking to plat a subdivISion that will Include eight residential units/lots and one
common/recreation lot
John Schodtler
Planner I
---nOnglnal Message-nn
From: Jill Heath [mallto Jllllansphotography@tampabay rr com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 03,2004 10,54 AM
To: Schodtler, John
Subject: HI John
! would like to get more Info on the vanance for 330 palm bluff What IS the allotment for the parcel now?
I understood It was 5 Individual dwellings and the developers are asking to put In 8
Please advise,
Jill Heath727-446-4559
J illian' s
Photography
11/3/2004
r
~~
~(>8iHrwater
:: \.~....._ /:: ........--...--.r
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING
100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
WWW MYCLEAR WATER COM
u
October 18, 2004
RE: NOTICE OF FILING OF AN APPLICATION FOR FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT
APPROV AL AT 300 PALM BLUFF ST (FLS2004-09064)
To Surroundmg Property Owners
As a property owner wlthm 200 feet of 300 PALM BL UF F ST, the City of Clearwa ter Planmng Department
gives notIce that an apphcatlon for FlexIble Standard Development to plat mne residential lots and construct
eight new detached dwelhng umts, m the LMDR zonmg dlstnct, per SectIons 2-203 C and 4-703 A Please see
the attached matnx for complete project request
On November 12,2004, the Development Review Comlmttee (composed of the CIty's professiOnal staff) will
review and detenmne whether the applicatIOn demonstrates comphance with the City'S Commumty
Development Code Followmg that revIew and detenmmatlOn, the Planmng Duector wIillssue a
Development Order approvmg, approvmg wIth conditions, or denymg the applicatIOn The earhest date that
the CIty will make a decIsion on the appltcatlon will be November 12, 2004
The City encourages you to participate m the review of this apphcatiOn You may contact me at 727-562-4604
or John Schodtler@myclearwater com for further mformatlOn, VISlt our office to review the files and/or submit
wntten comments to be conSidered m the CIty'S revIew of the apphcatlOn Please be advised that the apphcant
may submit addItional or new mformatiOn regardmg this case, which you may reVlew dunng regular busmess
hours However, no further notice will be provided to you should the application be amended
An appeal of the decIsion of the Planmng Director may be mltmted by the apphcant or property owners wlthm
the reqUIred notice area who present competent substantIal eVidence at, or pnor to, the Development ReView
Committee meetmg on November 12,2004 An appeal must be filed, mciudmg an appeal fee, wIth the
Plannmg Department withIn seven days ofthe date ofthe Development Order
Thank you for your mterest m the CIty of Clearwater's development review process You may access our
Plannmg Department through the City'S webslte www myclearwater com
Smcerely yours,
~'--
Planner I
Lelia Of No IIfl callOrl - FLS2004-09064 - 300 PAl M BLUFF ST
9'
..r"~I'*:I
Ilb.\AllI'r~'::"':,O ,
l~'''''''''>:>.~&
,Q]:0 I J.. 1 'i e.~
rIiiI~~ "~1IIi
~ r::: ~ c:s"
':.i1"\~ """':
~~.~.n'" ~
.......~~4TE~,.,..
Zonmg Conamtlli John SchodtJer
10/07/2004 Provide Impervious Surface Ration (ISR) calculations for each IndiVidual lot Residential Urban
land use reqUires each lot meet 0 65 ISR
Resubmit bUilding elevations Provide dimensions Including base flood, maximum bUilding
height, etc
Provide eVidence supporting how the charactenstlcs of the bUilding heights and setbacks are
charactenstlc of other structures In the surrounding neighborhood Photographs and/or surverys
are acceptable
Provide eVidence supporting how the charactenstlCS of the fence heights and setbacks are
charactenstlc of other fence structures In the surrounding neighborhood Photographs and/or
surverys are acceptable
Conditions Associated With
FLS2004-09064
300 PALM BLUFF 5T
562-4604
1 0/11/2004
10/11/2004
10/11/2004
Print Date 10/12/2004
Page 1 of 1
Not Met
Not Met
Not Met
Not Met
CaseCondllons
u
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING
100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
WWW MYCLEAR WATER COM
October 12, 2004
Keith Zayac
1 01 PhillIppe Parkway
Ste 205
Safety Harbor, FI 34695
RE FLS2004-09064 -- 300 PALM BLUFF ST -- Letter of Completeness
Dear Keith Zayac
The Plailllll1g Staff has entered your apphcatIon mto the Department's filmg sy&tem and assigned the
case number FLS2004-09064 After a prehmmary review of the submitted documents, staffhas
detennmed that the applIcation IS Comvlete
The Development RevIew CommIttee (DRC) Will reVIew the applIcation for sufficiency on
November 12,2004, m the Plannmg Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor
of the MUl11Clpal SerVIces BUIldmg The bUildIng IS located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue In
downtown Clcarwater Please call Sherry WatkIns, AdmInistratIve Analyst, at 727-562-4582 no
ear\tcr than one week pnor to the meetIng date for the approximate tIme that your case will be
revIewed You or your representatIve (as applicable) must be present to answer al1Y questIol1s that the
DRC may have regardIng your applIcatIOn AddItIOnal comments may be generated by the DRe at the
tIme of the meetmg
If you have any questIOns, please do not hesItate to contact me at 727-562-4604 or
John Schodtler@mycIearwater com
Smcerely yours,
John Schodtler
Planner I
Leller of Completeness - f! ')2004-09064 - 300 PALM BLun Sf
, .I.'"'~~
,1~C. "'~<11~"""
~~~~";;.':.
,......"", oJ,. ~ ~-
:~<,/ i l :;
..~l = ~~..
':......~~ ~"
-~-- :
";.7/p" =,,, ~,
-........;fTE~:.,'.
ZOning ConiJrntfn John Schodtler
1 0107/2004 Provld elm pervious Su rface Ration (I S R) calcu lations for each I nd IVld uallot Res Identla I Urba n
land use requires each lot meet 0 65 ISR
Description of Request appears to be Incomplete 1) Request should Include setback reductions
from pavement 2) Some of the proposed setbacks do not appear to be measured from property
lines 3) Request should Include SIX foot high wall located In front setbacks Resubmit request
page
10/11/2004
10/11/2004
1 0/11/2004
10/11/2004
,"
Conditions Associated With
FLS2004-09064
300 PALM BLUFF ST
562-4604
Resubmit bUilding elevations Provide dimensions including base flood, maximum bUilding
height, etc
Provide eVidence supporting how the charactenstlcs of the bUilding heights and setbacks are
characteristic of other structures In the surrounding neighborhood Photographs and/or surverys
are acceptable
Provide eVidence supporting how the charactenstlcs of the fence heights and setbacks are
charactenstlc of other fence structures In the surrounding neighborhood Photographs and/or
surverys are acceptable
Pn nt Date 1 0/11/2004
Page 1 of 1
Not Met
Not Met
Not Met
Not Met
Not Met
CaseCondltons
<'
~
LL~~i
~~Ce-arwater
':::~~
o
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING
100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
WWW MYCLEARW A TER COM
October 18, 2004
RE: NOTICE OF FILING OF AN APPLICATION FOR FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT
APPROVAL AT 300 PALM BLUFF ST (FLS2004-09064)
To Surroundmg Property Owners
As a property owner wlthm 200 feet of 300 PALM BLUFF ST, the CIty of Clearwater Plannmg Department
gIves notIce that an apphcatlOn for FleXIble Standard Development to plat mne resldenttallots and construct
eight new detached dwellmg umts, m the LMDR zomng dlstnct, per SectIOns 2-203 C and 4-703 A Please see
the attached matnx for complete project request
On November 12, 2004, the Development RevIew Comnuttee (composed ofthe City'S professIOnal staff) WIll
reVIew and detemnne whether the apphcatIOn demonstrates comphance WIth the CIty'S Commumty
Development Code Followmg that reView and determlmatlOn, the Plannmg DIrector wIll Issue a
Development Order approvmg, approvmg wIth condlttons, or denymg the apphcatton The earhest date that
the CIty WIll make a decIsIOn on the apphcatton WIll be November 12, 2004
The CIty encourages you to partiCIpate m the reVIew OfthlS apphcatton You may contact me at 727-562-4604
or John Schodtler@myclearwater com for further mformatton, VISIt our office to reVIew the files and/or submIt
wntten comments to be conSIdered m the City's reVIew of the apphcatlOn Please be adVIsed that the apphcant
may submIt addlttonal or new mformatIOn regardmg thIS case, whIch you may reVIew dunng regular bus mess
hours However, no further notIce Will be proVided to you should the apphcatton be amended
An appeal of the deCISIOn of the Planmng DIrector may be lmttated by the apphcant or property owners wlthm
the reqUlred nottce area who present competent substantial eVIdence at, or pnor to, the Development RevIew
CommIttee meetmg on November 12,2004 An appeal must be filed, mcludmg an appeal fee, with the
Planmng Department wlthm seven days of the date of the Development Order
Thank you for your mterest m the City of Clearwater's development reView process You may access our
Plannmg Department through the CIty'S web sIte www myclearwater com
Planner I
Letter ofNollficatlO1/ - HS2004-09064 - 300 PALM BLUFF ST
~ ,;
Rd
b k d
b ld h h
fi 11
. e llctlOn m set ac s an mcrease m UI mg elgJ t are as 0 ows
Flexible Standard Develonment Cnterla
Proposed Setbacks ReqUIred Proposed BIdg ReqUIred Bldg Ht
Setbacks Ht
LOT #1 000 FT PYMT WEST) 15-25 FT FRONT 44 3 IT (1) 30 FT MAX
300 FT WALL EAST) 15-25 FT FRONT
15 0 IT BLOG ( EASn 15-25 FT FRONT
5 00 FT BLOG [NORTH) 5 FT SIDE
000 IT PYMT (NORTH) 5 FT SIDE
5 00 FT BLDG SOUTH 15-25 FT FRONT
o 00 FT PYMT SOUTH 15-25 IT FRONT
LOT #2 o 00 IT PVMT WEST) 15-25 FT FRONT ' 403FT (2) 30 FT MAX
3 00 IT WALL I EAST) 15-25 IT FRONT
15 00 FT BLOG (EAST) 15-25 FT FRONT
5 00 FT BLOG SOUTH 15-25 FT FRONT
o 00 FT PVMT SOUTH 15-25 FT FRONT
o 00 FT PVMT :NORTH ] 5-25 FT FRONT
5 00 FT BLDG NORTH 15-25 IT FRONT
LOT #3 o 00 FT PVMT WEST) 15-25 FT FRONT 410FT (I) 30 FT MAX
5 25 FT BLOG EASn 15-25 FT FRONT
300 FT WALL EAST) 15-25 FT FRONT
o 00 FT PVMT (NORTH) 5 FT SIDE
LOT #4 o 00 FT PVMT WESn 5 FT SIDE 430FT (1) 30 FT MAX
o 00 FT PVMT EASn 5 FT SIDE
o 00 FT PVMT :NORTH) 15-25 FT FRONT
2000 FT BLOG (NORTH) 15-25 FT FRONT
5 00 IT BLOG I SOUTH) 15-25 FT FRONT
300 FT WALL SOUTH) 15-25 IT FRONT
LOT #5 o 00 IT PVMT WEST) 15-25 IT FRONT 31 0 IT (2) 30 IT MAX
17 50 FT BLOG (WES n 15-25 FT FRONT
o 00 FT PVMT EAST 5 FT SIDE
o 00 FT PVMT :NORTH 15-25 FT FRONT
o 00 FT PVMT SOUTH 15-25 IT FRONT
150FT BLOG SOUTH 15-25 FT FRONT
300 FT WALL SOUTH 15-25 FT FRONT
LOT #6 o 00 FT PVMT WEST) 5 FT SIDE 310FT (2) 30FT MAX
o 00 IT PVMT EASn 15-25 FT FRONT
17 89 FT BLOG (EAST) 15-25 FT FRONT
18 05 FT BLOG (SOUTH) 15-25 FT FRONT
o 00 IT PVMT SOUTH) 15-25 FT FRONT
3 00 IT WALL I SOUTH) 15-25 FT FRONT
o 00 FI PVMT (NORTH) 15-25 FT FRONT
LOT #7 2 00 IT PVMT (EASn 5 FT SIDE 260FT (2) 30 FT MAX
10 12 FT BLOG (NORTH) 5-]5 FT REAR
3 00 FT WALL (SOUTH) 15-25 IT FRONr
] 740 IT BLOG (SOUTH) ] 5-25 FT FRONT
LOT #8 o 00 F r PVMT (WEST) 15-25 IT FRONT 210FT (2) 30 FT MAX
o 00 FT PVMT (EAST) 15-25 Ff FRONT
000 FT PVMI (NORTH) 5 IT SIDE
10 00 FT (NORTH) 5 FT SIDE
*NOIE
(1) BLOG HI IS FROM GRADE TO
FLAT ROOF TOP
(2) BLOG HI IS FROM FEMA
FLOOD LINE TO ROOF TOP
. 60FT HIGH WALL V ARlANCE FROM 36 INCH WALL
J tf () ~PI1L/tJ ffLt( ~/; .:J S
MC CORMICK, JOHN
1201 N OSCEOLA AVE
CLEARW ATER FL 33755 - 2466
PURCELL, LEE H
PURCELL, JANET L
1012 N OSCEOLA AVE
CLEARW ATER FL 33755 - 3064
PRESIDIO PROPERTIES INC
300 N OSCEOLA AVE # 6B
CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3917
WARE, JOHNM
303 PALM BLUFF DR
CLEARW ATER FL 33755 - 3048
PERLEBERG, HANS J
IPERLEBERG,BETTINA
I , 1208 SUNSET DR
I CLEARWATERFL 33755 - 2449
CARNEGIE, DANIEL C
, CARNEGIE, BRENDA K
11217 N OSCEOLA AVE
I
CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 2439
SHROCK, KARL M W ARE, JOHN M LEE, ROBIN G
SHROCK, SHIRLEY S ' 303 PALM BLUFF ST 300 ENGMANN ST
308 ENGMAN ST CLEARWATERFL 33755 - 3048 CLEARWATERFL 33755 - 2401
CLEARWATERFL 33755 - 2400
BERRY, MICHAEL C SR LEWIS, RONALD L TRE I POOK, PEACHES
BERRY, PAULAM I ,I LEWIS, STEPHANI K TRE : 'I 234 DOLPHIN POINT RD # 1
1106 N FT HARRISON AVE # 1 I I 1498 DE TRACEY ST CLEARWATER FL 33767-
I CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3020 :, SAN JOSE CA 95128 - 4442
PERLEBERG, HANS J I MC CORMICK, JOHN D . MC CORMICK, JOHN
PERLEBERG, BETTINA MC CORMICK, CARL YNN L 15020 BURWOOD DR
1208 SUNSET DR 15020 BURWOOD DR I PERRIS CA 92570 - 9499
CLEARW ATER FL 33755 - 2449 PERRIS CA 92570 - 9499 'I
CARNEGIE, DANIEL C I r WARE, JOHNM I AND INDUSTRIES INC
CARNEGIE, BRENDA K I 303 PALM BLUFF ST ; 8123 RIVER COUNTRY DR
4409 WORTHINGTON CIR ! : I CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3048 SPRING HILL FL 34607 - 2132
PALM HARBOR FL 34685 - 1159 ' .1
' I
FETROW, DENNIS SCHOENHERR, KARIN : WELLS, DEBORAH
705 S MAIN ST : 1217 SUNSET DR 2919 WEST BAY DR
I
NEVADA MO 64772 - 3557 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 2450 I BELLE AIR BLUFFS FL 33770 -
I
FETROW, DENNIS J KEARNS, WAYNE D BERC, CAROL A TRE
705 S MAIN ST KEARNS, GERTRUDE i 11000SCEOLAAVEN
NEV ADA MO 64772 - 3557 404 PALM BLUFF ST i, CLEARWATERFL 33755 - 3042
I CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3049 ' ,
.
WELLS, DEBORAH " MC DOUGALL, JAMES I ' '
I
2919 WEST BAY DR 1213 N OSCEOLA AVE I
BELLEAlR BLUFFS FL 33770 - CLEARWATERFL 33755 - 2439
j'
. "
~~iarwater
~ -'-c ~
o
- C I T Y 0 F C L E fR W ATE R
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING
100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
WWW MYCLEAR WATER COM
October 11, 2004
Keith Zayac
101 Phillippe Parkway
Ste 205
Safety Harbor, Fl 34695
RE FLS2004-09064 -- 300 PALM BLUFF ST ~- Letter of Incompleteness
Dear Keith Zayac
The PI3illlmg Staff has entered your applIcatIOn mto the Department's filing system and assIgned the
case l1umber FLS2004-09064 After a prelImll1ary reVIew of the submitted documents, staff has
determmed that the applicatIOn IS Incomplete wIth the followmg comments
DescnptlOn of Request appears to be ll1complete 1) Request should mc1ude setback
reductIons from pavement 2) Some of the proposed setbacks do not appear to be measured
from property lines 3) Request should mc1ude SIX foot hIgh wall located m front setbacks
ResubmIt request page
Section 4-202 of the Commumty Development Code states that Ifan applIcatiOn IS deemed
mcomplete, the defiCienCies of the applIcatIOn shall be speCified by Staff No further development
reVIew actIon shall be taken untIl the defiCIenCies are corrected and the applIcatton IS deemed
complete Please resubmit by Monday, October I I, 2004 (4 30 pm) to stay on track for the
Novcmber 12,2004 Development Review Comrmttee meetmg
If you have any questIons, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4604 or
John Schodtler@myc1earwater corn
Smcerely yours,
~. ~'^^'--
John Schodtler
Plailller I
I e/ler of Incompleteness - Ff )2004-09064 - 300 PALM BLUr}' ,5 T
-
"
..
;(<Jltrwater
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING
100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
WWW MYCLEARWATER COM
u
October 0 I, 2004
Keith Zayac
101 PhIllippe Parkway
Ste 205
Safety Harbor, Fl 34695
RE FLS2004-09064 n 300 PALM BLUFF 8T -- letter of Incompleteness
Dcar KClth Zayac
Thc PlannIng Staff has entcrcd your application mto the Department's fihng system and assigned the
casc number FLS2004-09064 After a prelImmary rcvlew of the submlttcd documents, staffhas
detennmed that thc apphcatIon IS Incomplete wIth the followmg comment~
I DescnptlOn of Request appears to bc mcomplete To make descnptIon eaSICr perhaps gIVC a
breakdown pcr lot Request should mclude lot Size, setback rcducttons from bUIldmgs and
pavcment and any mcreasc') to maXImum height
2 RevIse parcel size to reflect only non-submerged lands A note to mdlcdte therc IS an addItIon
6 03 acres of submerged land Included with the propcrty IS acceptable
3 Provide IdcntlficatlOn c1edrly statmg that the drawmgs arc apart of a prehmmary plat
4 ProvIde approXImate (to the nearest foot) dlmesnslOlls and arca of a) the overall plat, b) each
lot, c) street nghts-of-ways, d) common open space or othcr land to be dedicated for a publIc
purpose If any
SectIon 4-202 of the Commumty Dcvelopment Code ~tdtes that If an applIcatlOn IS decmcd
Incomplete, the dcficlcncIes of lhe application shall be specified by Staff No further development
revIew achOD shdll be taken unttl the defiCIencIes arc corrected and the apphcatlOn lS deemed
complete Pledse resubmIt by Fnday, October 8,2004
IfYOLl have any questtons, plca')e do not heSitate to contact me dt727-562-4604 or
John Schodtler@myclcarwater com
Smcerely yours,
~~~lu.-
John Schodtler
Planncr I
LeIIU ojfncvmplelweH - Ff S2004-09064 - 300 PALM SLUFF ST
10/11/2004 16.27
7277239?:n
ZAYAC
_I:'AGE 02
RECEIVED
..-
~
RECEIVED
OCT 1 2 200~ I If' T ,J 1 11lI1~
ATTACHMENT A
P~Nb~~~~~=~T DESCRIPTION OF REQUESTS PLANNING DEPARTMENT
· Reductlon in setbacks and increase ln budding height are as folloClTV OF ClEARWATEP
FIe.1bIe SUDd*rd DeveJomueat Criteria
Pryposed SetbukJ Required Proposed Required BIdg.
/ SetbBCIuJ 814:12. Ht. Hl
LOT Nt v' 0 00 FT PVMT r'WEs 1 15-25 FT. FRONT 44.3 FT (I) 30 FT MAX
3 00 Ff WALL (EASl 15-25 FT. fRONT
1:5.0 FT. BLOO lEAST 15~25 IT FRONT
....5'00 IT BLOG "NORTH 5 IT SIDE
./ 0.00 Fr PVMT :NORTH 5 IT SIDE
5.00 IT BLOO. SOUTl 15-25 fiT FRONT
0.00 FT. PVMT. SOOT 15.25 FT. FRONT
LOT tn. ,,'0.00 FT. PYMT :wEST 15-2j; FT FRONT 40 3 Ff (2) 30 IT MAX
-1~ .3 00 IT WALL EASTl 15-25 FT. fRONT
t500 Fr. SLOG lEAST) 15-25 FT FRONT
... 5.00 IT BLDG SOUTH 15.25 FT FRONT
~ I 0.00 FT PYMT SOUTH ) 5-25 IT FRONT
000 IT PVMT aRT 15-25 IT fRONT
5" 00 FT. BLDG ORT! 15-25 IT FRONT
4 ~ .t, LOT It3 0.00 FT PVMr (EST 15-25 IT FRONT 410n.(l) 30 IT. MAX
5 2S FT BLDG. EASn 15.25 FT FRONT
, r,..~ 3 00 IT WALL /EASn 15~25 IT fRONT
o 00 FT PVMT (NORTH) 5 FT. SIDE
LOT N4 D.OO IT PVMT WES 5 IT SIDE 43 0 IT (1) 30 Ff MAX
000 fT PYMf EAg" 5 IT SIDE
0.00 IT PVMT [NOR H1 15-25 IT FRONT
20.00 fT BLIXt (NORTH) 15-25 IT FRONT
500FT BLDG SOUTH) 15-25 FT FRONT
300FT WALL sour: 0 15.25 FT FRONT
WTH! 0.00 FT PVMT WESl 15.25 FT_ FRONT 31 0 Ff (2) ]0 FT MAX
17 SOFT BLOO WES n 15-2,5 FT FRONT
o 00 FT PVMT. EAST 5 fT SIDE
o 00 FT. PVMT NORT 15~25 FT FRONT
o 00 FT. PVMT. sou 15-25 FT FRONT
15.0 FT BLDG SOU 15-25 IT FRONT
3.00 Ff WALL j SOU 15-25 IT FRONT
WT#6 0,(1) IT PVMT rwESn 5 IT SIDE ]1 OFT (2) 30 FT MAX
000 FT PVMT rEASD 15-25 FT. FRONT
11 89 FT. BLDG. lEAST) 15-25 IT FRONT
18GS FT BLOO (SOUTH) 15-25 IT FRONT
000 IT PVMr. SOtmf 15.25 FT FRONT
300FT WAlllSOUTH 15-25 FT FRONT
000 FT. PVMT QiORTH} 15-25 FT FRONT
LOT trT 2.00 FT. pVMfiEASn 5 IT SIDE 26 0 IT (2) 30 IT MAX.
10.12 IT BLOO (NORTIn 5-15 FT. REAR
300FT WALL (SOlTID 15-25 FT FRONT
17.40 IT BLDG. (SOUTID 15-25 FT FRONT
LOT #8 000 FT PVMT. (WE ST) 15-25 fT FRONT 21.0 FT (2) 30 FT. MAX
OJXl FT. PVMT EAST) 15.25 FT. FRONT
000 FT PVMi (NORTffl 5 IT SIDE
10/11/2004 16'27 727723q~~7
ZAYAC
PAGE 03
to 00 FT (NORTH) 5 FT SIDE I
'NOTE
(1) BLOO FlT IS FROM GRADE
TO FLAT ROOf TOP
(2) BLDG HT IS FROM FEMA
FLOOD LINE TO ROOF TOP
· 6.0 Ff IllGH WAIL VARIANCE FROM 36 INCH WAIL RECEIVED
OCT I (', ~oo~
plANNING DEPARTMENT
C\1Y OF CLEARWATER
8..;y
)
"'tJ I C=:l
l
()~ m
~ s:
< ,.... 5C
~;; ;:lO
~~, Q m
- ~
~~' ~ cg
):0'5:
m~ m
:1)-1
~ ~
.
, , !
~ I- . ~
" .
~='i'=:I~ .. ..'
I
I
/
!
..
I. I~
~I
. E
11
t x I i ~
HIli ~
!! ~ I <>
f R I
I ~
.....,..... l'ALVllILUTF
...." ''''''~A'l'KR l'LD1lIDA
I(UfH ZAYAC..A5SCXJATr:5.INC
(.I'd rMIN"~lI:N(l L~"T ~l..n1TT~"'~r "l>>...~
WISN:B ~ LLC ~"4r~~~
9408 BRACOM 9'J'RIiZJ' "t......, F!J"J"<~
~ ~ I1JmiI>>. 3:tOR ~J;~~
SITE PLAN
('
'-
...
6'4y
~ c=:r
2'
(")5 rn
-z
:.10 3::
~; "... ts=a
:::0
om = m
~~ - c=7
~!ij .....'
~ ~
):>E:
rTll'T'l M
:D~
en
<
~ [
I
(
/
!
- -
--
..
l; I~
a
. E
II
: xi' i
! I -
Hln !;;
~
n ~ I 0
I · I
I ~
011
....:.. - ., '!II
L<<'
CUWlWATER FLOJlIDA
KEJTH ZAYAC..AS.50{JATES,INC
YISNI: ~ LLt ~~r-;.~':~lUtTlf'il~~\~j~~~~ ~~"!~\
S4lI8 BRAOOJri :Il'RIi:I:T ~.!!.....IJ...Er.3...~iIWlIli_____ ~_ _ _ _-=----"-
POlIPiNO:BI.ICB. J'J.OImit. ~ ~~'Y'!f!.~;
IliUI...ID1I*JI[2.\'U,I,~_ _~ _ _ _
PALM MUFF
!i: ~!i
SITE PLAN
=-=~~~:~ hQ. ~Ti ~
"
(
LOT 1 ARCHITECT CIVIL
SQFT % SQFT %
LOT AREA 5626 100 558354 100
SLOG AREA 2746 488 274718 492
PAVING AREA 263 46 26261 47
IMPERVIOUS AREA 3009 534 3009 79 539
GREEN AREA 2617 577 2573 75 4609
ARCH FAR 7397 1 31 N/A N/A
LOT 2 ARCHITECT CIVIL
SQFT % SQFT %
LOT AREA 6886 100 6833 11 100
SLOG AREA 3005 436 3023 33 4424
PAVING AREA 621 9 620 81 908
IMPERVIOUS AREA 3626 426 3644 14 5333
GREEN AREA 3230 574 318897 4666
ARCH FAR 6768 098 N/A N/A
LOT 3 ARCHITECT CIVIL
SQFT % SQFT %
LOT AREA 6203 100 6203 61 100
SLOG AREA 2585 367 2584 7 4166
PAVING AREA 654 105 653 43 1053
IMPERVIOUS AREA 3239 472 3238 13 5219
GREEN AREA 2964 528 2965 48 478
ARCH FAR 6197 099 N/A N/A
LOT4 ARCHITECT CIVIL
SQFT % SQFT %
LOT AREA 6005 100 6008 38 100
SLOG AREA 2974 495 262301 4365
PAVING AREA 854 142 8543 1421
IMPERVIOUS AREA 3828 637 3477 31 5787
GREEN AREA 2177 363 2531 07 4212
ARCH FAR 6768 1 13 N/A N/A
LOTS ARCHITECT CIVIL
SQFT % SQFT %
LOT AREA 5000 100 508651 100
SLOG AREA 2881 576 2857 27 5713
PAVING AREA 362 72 371 96 743
IMPERVIOUS AREA 3243 648 3229 23 6348
GREEN AREA 1757 352 1857 28 3651
ARCH FAR 6732 1 35 N/A N/A
LOT6 ARCHITECT CIVIL
SQFT % SQFT %
LOT AREA 5026 100 5026 62 5026 62
SLOG AREA 2881 573 2852 04 5684
PAVING AREA 336 66 345 76 687
~ I
r- -^~
z
0~ Inn]
~z 3:
~("'l
Q~ );> ~
::0
~~ 0- m
- c=:J
l2 "... 'c:g
'';,:I
~
rTIr., @
:o~
(I)
@ L( , J
(i
IMPERVIOUS AREA 3217 639 31978 6361
GREEN AREA 1809 361 1828 82 3638
ARCH FAR 6219 1 23 N/A N/A
LOT 7 ARCHITECT CIVIL
SQFT % SQFT %
LOT AREA 11750 100 11557 78 100
SLDG AREA 2712 23 271546 2349
PAVING AREA 1453 123 674 18 583
IMPERVIOUS AREA 4165 353 3359 64 2906
GREEN AREA 7585 647 8198 14 7093
ARCH FAR 4376 037 NIA N/A
LOTS ARCHITECT CIVIL
SQFT % SQFT %
LOT AREA 8488 100 8580 8 100
SLDG AREA 4090 481 4090 4766
PAVING AREA 171 2 620 81 726
IMPERVIOUS AREA 4261 501 471081 5489
GREEN AREA 4227 499 3869 99 451
ARCH FAR 7920 093 N/A N/A
TRACT "A" ARCHITECT CIVIL
SQFT % SQFT %
LOT AREA 0 0 9268 6 100
- 0 0 0 0
PAVING AREA 0 0 7989 5 8619
IMPERVIOUS AREA 0 0 7989 5 8619
GREEN AREA 0 0 1279 1 138
ARCH FAR 0 0 N/A N/A
~ r- ^~~J
z
()~ fiinJ
-.".
:;10 ~
~; ::0 ~
om Q IM1
F~ --
~, r- r:::::J
'..i0 ,
<. ... -) ~
,l.': (..)
?rn VI
7' nri1
.:0....
(n
<: ~
@
f'
O>..,<} ;.-
~ ~ 0 I~~~ ~ I=; 5
~ li ~ lQl~~ ~ l\ i
,,~ I) b gl;" 0....
m ... ,. "m
~,. .. ~;> ....
~
~1JQJ5
d:~ --{
"l11!' ~
gl; ~
"I;~
~
!2~:~ ~ ~~l ~
"1;::::: ~ :: ~ ~
~~!;~ ~ ~~ ~
1,01I ~ N
,.
sl'lm~ ~ ~ I~~~ l!j
~ !:i
~ ;~~:"'l8 Q
~ =
n "
.... ....
)>
"
;;~ ~:~ 2
;:0
"'
"
....
~!:.
m .,
""~ !
~ ~ ~
,. ~
!il!:~"E
~~~~~i
~ "l;l;"l;l;~
51 ~~~
..
I~~!~ ~ ~
"''11; ~
~ ",. ~ r-
o c;.;. 0
-I ((,I': ....
... l; ...
'l!
,.
:iU :~ ;~H
!:i !.i
_~~8 Q ~~ e~8 Q
~ ~
n n
.... ....
'" ~~ ~3
~
....~:Q;;8 ~
;:0
"'
"
..
~~~~ 8
e~~!! ~
-ti:;!~~"
is
I>
"
""to.... ~ n
li...~ ~8 %
;j
"
....
~ ~~
I>
8 ~
::;
"'
"
....
...~'W~
~~ ~~
~ II>>~
~ n
O!
:~ 4. a F
,. ~:;! u
- '!'" ~~ n
O!
~~~; -o.~F
~~ ~~ 0
"" ~~... n
O!
~:~~~~;q"
"ii! ~ ~~
~~t; ;~n
O!
~ ~~6~~F
7 ~ " ~..o
~I;j~~ ~
~ :::::: n
::e
,. l!;lij~F
~~"'\i~~~
:;:: "c:; t:::: ~ n
m :;;:
~ :.I'" - F
~1.lS:~1l
~-;:;~ ~(;
~:ijj t;r>~
- n
O!
" ;~tB F
11
"-l;j"; l:iO
;:: 8~~~
~ -"
O!
~ ~""'~"';;l!Iq=
~_&o~
~u
- ~ ,~
/
!
I~
~
~
I;;
a
.~
, I
,. )( I ~
. I I ..
UIII B
lip i5
P 15
I ~
~lCl;,i'lQll,
CLEARWATER FLOJl]]).I.
KurH ZAY AC8-AS.SCXlATr..5.INC
WISNI: ~ LLC ~~':~urr~~~~~JfIT(.TlJI:r ~_~..
3409 BEACOH S'I'REEf ~~~\-"'--== ....___
POKPatlO BbaL J'WIIIDIl ~ E~~~.(~__ _ ~ _ __~_ _
PALVllJLUFF
lil
I ! ;
SlTE PLAN
_......UUJIII-....
[1IIK!I1:ZIII....lIIJKIIIIII<fIDCI~
..-
~
'I
WlSNE Development LLC
"Palm Bluff Preserve"
OR\G\NAL
It is the intention of the Wisne Development LLC to provide a community
exemplary of all that is good with the natural surroundings here in
Clearwater on the Bluff. We are making the very most of the undulating
characteristics of the land. All structures will have unobstructed water,
beach and sunset views.
While some homes have been built with a few of our features, no
communities have taken a posture qUIte like this All eco friendly, the
homes close to the waterfront will be lower 10 height than those at the rear of
the property.
None of the homes will have traditiOnal hip or gable roofs. All roofs will be
flat marble mosaic terraces appointed with beautiful railings and balustrades.
Urns planted with palm trees, selected specimen foliage and bougainvillea
will be featured on all terraces with outdoor umbrella tables as well.
The homes will be built on pilings and piers as not to dIsturb the root system
of the mature Oak trees currently on site. Minimal portion of the homes
will actually cut into the land. While considerately more expensive, we feel
it is well worth the expense to spare the trees.
r
4
We feel that Clearwater is the perfect locatIOn to produce a proto type of this
nature WIth what we believe will garner national recognition for this enclave.
The majestic height and girth of the trees was indeed the inspiration for this
type of community.
Two of the homes on the site have been designed to be built around the trees
with the trunk and branches to be viewed from most rooms within the
structure - we choose to build around, and with nature instead of against it.
All driveways and private roads will be done with individual pavers as to
promote aeration and irrigation for the trees. There will be no grass on the
grounds. Xeriscape is the key to all the selections of plantings. Only
beautiful gardens and flowering trees will be implemented where ever
possible.
We are consulting with Alan Mayberry; Clearwater's most well known
arborist every step of the way.
The majority of builders, for economic reasons, strip the land first, and then
build, consequently loosing the great patina and character of age that comes
with mature trees and plantings.
Weare building around them with the vision that upon completion, the
homes will look like they have always been there.
OR1GINAL
1
The classic architecture and styling of the homes have nuances that date
,
back to the 1920's and 30's. With their Art Deco influence they appear to
be timeless and we belIeve will fit into the eclecticism of Clearwater most
comfortably The sImplicity of our homes is what will make them feel
harmonious to the Clearwater area.
The decorative walls and fencing around this enclave will consist of stucco
columns, light wrought iron detailing and lighting. Upon completion of
landscaping, the formal hedge rows, flowering trees and low beds of flowers
and cover the structure of the wall wdl appear to be seasoned and to have
been there for many years as well.
It is with great excitement that we embark upon a project that is so sensitive
and cognizant to the land and that which grows upon it.
Thank you,
John Breco
OR\G\NAL
..Ii.
..Ii.
0
0
0
en
(")
CD
0
-
m
I
(II
~
m
-
-
-.
..Ii.
-
0
....
....
..
0
3
"tJ
Q)
-
3
OJ
-
c
=I:
QO
0
en
n
CD
0
-
m
,.
,//
.
4
C Za:
LU U") ~~
> <=) ~3f
'::)
.:-.... ffi~
- C"':
W C-'
U -z (!)u
zu..
4 -0
W ~ ~~
~ :5<J
0-
OR\G\NAL
--!.
0
.-+
en
0
C
.-+
::r
0
---+t
--!.
--!.
0 ~
0
0
(f)
()
CD
0 ,~
Q) -
.
Qo
-0 r .
Q)
3
CD
c
:::t
,.
01 .. t
- ~ # '\.
~ ;'$
. .
" .-
0' " ..r!'
1\' t
0 I.," .~'"'
.-+ r.
"
~ .J t~
- ..' -~!f
Q) ",.
- ~<f;
0 'l:
::J ~, ~.. ....
~ \~
en v:!- A .
. t" -fa
.-+ ".!. r "
.., ..(.1 ,
CD "~
CD ~.t
.-+ ~~~.b .
.. '"~ I
~ .-oc
-_.
,
r
,
c z
>LU ~ ~I
~ il
W- cr: ill ~
0-'
O "Z 00
W ~ ~O
Q: ~fj
.0
"'\ ~ \,
\ \
z
o
'"'0::1-
m :::T
3 :E
(l)
CJ~
~~
I 3
ct(l)
:J ...,
o en
(l) c:
o :J
:J ~
en .....
=rQo
(l) m
m.:J
oce
< 3
(l) m
..., :J
0'>,
mO
:J
:J (l)
:::TO"
(l) 0
ce. ~
:::T ....,
.....0
3
.,.J'
?
~
~ I
-
",.
~~
-'.....
...~-~
'.
~
.,-:
~
'""~
...
...
-
~ --~. ....
... -
..
...
t
C ~'k
~ U") ~i
C:;)
I:::)
c..., tE'k
- cY':> wi$
W - , Q-J
U Z (DO
ZLL
.::( -0
W -, Z~
~ ~-
0..0
ORIG[NA~
. . . .
0 Qo (') Z
en CD :f::
0 0-
CD D> (')
0 ..., 0
D> ...,
:J
CD
...,
.
C 2~
~ g ~~
- ~ ~~
w cYj ffi UJ
O ..--j c .....
:z (!)u
LU ~ ~o
~ ~~
Q..o
OR\G\Nf\l
\
~--
f
f
lit.
I ,
/
C/
Ie
~.
.~
V,
Ii
'I.
.. ,."
~
~-
p; - -
- ..
~.".
...............
-~~- .
r- .
\~
\11.:." ...
. . . .
0 Qo C1 Z
en CD ~
0 a.
CD Q) C1
0 .., 0
m ..,
:::J
CD
..,
~
0 !Z
~ we::
Lr') ~~
<=:)
<=:) ~~
.......
- ffii2i
W C\";,)
.- 0......
U z <.!)u
.:::( ZLL
W -, -0
z
Q! ~~
Q.U
OR\G\NAl
Z \
~
n
0 I:
-, I
:::J
CD
-,
()
CD
0-
m
-,
Qo
0
(/J
n
CD
0
m
~
~. ~
4."
.~. ~-
....... \
:,.,;,
l.{
:l~~
.
-if _,
I
.,.."
,,' ''''
'~':;
i' i
"r........
r
t
,
, ~
\.t
II
J
a ~~
~ Ln ~i
=== ~ i!~
LU C'I':l w~
....... 0-,
O z (!)o
<( ZLL
W -, zO
Q: s~
n.;U
OR\G\NAL
~
VJ
o
N
en
C
:J
C/'J
CD
r-+
I
"
CD
:J
C'>
CD
o
:J
en
r-+
..,
CD
CD
r-+
::::T
-.
a.
-.
:J
co
::u
<
. .
. .
.. .. .... . . . '\
. .. , ~ . ... '\ . "
.. .. . .. . . " .. "
.~""""."",
"~""...'\"\
1iII.".....,."."......"
"'~"Ilo'..""...,,'
..,~"...,......'t....... '" '.,
'\ .... , ... ... " " · · " . .. " " " ... 'It. ... . ...
... .", ) , " ... " '\ . '" . to " ... '" ... " " " ..
, ' , ' , . .' , . , ' , " ' ,. . ... , '. . ,. '. " ' , " ',' >,' .:...
~.,..'...""""..,........,......... ~....
........ .........,,,.... ..".,...."....... '...
... .. --
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
.
.
- ...
.
, .
'(
.
.. w __ - - --.-..
.
. . . . ~ ~ - - . . ~ . - - - . . . ~ - -
..-.....,,' '. ...,'.........
'............... .............,.... :-
,.............. ........,....,~...
......,............................"
"........,...........,......",...
""" .....................
..........................................
. ~ .. .. .. .. .. ... ~ . ~ ~ ~ ..
.. ... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . . ~ .. ...
.. .. · . . ~ :. .. lo ) . . . . . . ~ .'
. ............~......... ..~... .........
.~.... . ~ ~ ~ ~ : + . . ~ ... - - ~
. . ... . > .. ~ ^ . ~ . ~ ~ ~ .. ~
· · ~ · · . . . . . . ft .. .. ..
. . . ... ... , .) . . . '. ~ ~ .. p
. . . . .~ . . . . . ~ ... .. .. ,
... +.+ . ............ 1- ~ .. '"
i'
,
. "","'...
.... e".. .....
. .... .. ..
... '" .. ... ..
. .... .... 10 ... ..
... .... " .... ... ..
. ,.... ... .. ., ... ...
" .. .. ~ ~ ':-."" ...
~
'. .... .. ~'... ....... ...
. . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . .
............ ........
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
· · . . . . . . . . 9 .
. . . . . . . . . . . .
..................... ',....
.................... .......
..................:.:.:.:.:.:..
:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:..........:.:.:..
.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:....:.:.:..
,................................... .....
40....................................... .
.... . . . . - - . - ............ . . . . ....
'.:.:.:.:-:-:.:.::::.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:..._--
.. ... .. - .. .. - -
.......).......1"...
, ~ ~ ~ . . . . . ? ~
, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .. . . . .
.. . . . . . . . . . . .
'..........
.. . . · . . . . . . 4
..........
. . . . . . . . 4
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . - ..
.......
........
......
.......
. . . .. .
. . .. . ..
. . . .
.. .. - .
-.:::=
.
I
.....
".,.. Z Q:
..... LLI ~
LU ~ ~~
:> ~ iS~
- C'l') 0 -.I
W .- (!)o
O ~ ~o
-, z~
W ~o
Q:: Q.
ORIGINAL
I
0
c
C/J
CD
Q)
.....
z
0
(J) ;::l..
;::+: ::r
C/J ~
CJ1 CD
C/J
0 .....
~ ()
0 0
"""" ..,
..... ::J
::r CD
CD ..,
C/J 0
0- C/J
(')
CD CD
~ 0
Q,) Q)
" Q)
::J
0-
s: r11!1111llr
Q,) 1 I I ! \ l I ~ I
.., ! ; ~, !
C/J 1 ' I ".
::r .~ !
Q)
-
a ....
za::
~ &.l") ~~
C) ~3:
C)
C"o.I ~o:.
-
LU cr:> ~~
.....,
0 ::z: (!)u
<t ZLL
-0
LLI --, zj!:
~ ~o
C\'I~\\iAL
....Jr.
c.u
0
" ::c I\.)
CD 0 (J)
(J) :J $tO c: c:
...... 0 CJ) :J
CD CD CD CJ)
~ 0 CD
:J ......
O~. I;~L
c Z~
w~
LLI Lt') I~
~ ~
~
C"ooI
C"':)
W ~ 0....1
(!)u
0 :z zu..
<( -0
-, z
LLI ~6
~
Q..
\j
\N
0
" )> en
... N " '"tJ 0 0 0
0 c.n " D>> s:
:::1:3 ~ ... - tn 0 ~
0 0 3 Qo n ... :T
!. en w >< (I) ~ (I)
-. m 0 (I) D>>
(Q~ 0 3 - - ... tn
:TCil ar D>> s: D>> ~
~(I) ~ =:
~ (I) (I)
-. ~ -
~ '<
~
~
,
..
RECEIVED
Jt.l '-I ;~ LtiLJ
PLANNING DE.PARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
o
;:0
-
GJ
-
Z
.l>
rr-
"'T1
...
z 0 )> en
0 3 N "C "U 0 0 0
en (II "C Q) c
-I ... - en 0 ,...
m .... ,... 0 3 (') ... :r
... 0 QO
. . CD >< CD j CD
." CD W -. OJ 0 CD Q)
- ,... Q 3 - - ... en
Q) -. cr Q) c Q) ....
.... j .... =:
::a :t CD CD
.... -
0 CD '<
a -.
ca
::r
....
III
~
"
R-=-"r-" ~D
\.... -".... J V t:
JJ.\ I~ :1 Ll.il,i;)
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
o
:::0
-
G)
-
;Z
~
.-" -
... (~
'~~
~)4
,]~
~'"( ~
~ 'J
B
'_...~. --.
" J
\1\
\1~-3 1]\
pr- \\
I ~""Eq/
/ ~ ..-/,
/ ===r,-v, ,
'~~ ~,~
~
~
-.~J\.
\q~
\;
~
-
)>
... ~
"tI ... N
0 0 :T 0
Q) 0 (1) ~
- U)
3 ., z 0
QO 0 ::I
OJ (1) (1) 0 U)
0 ., ~ 0
- - 0 CD
C AI ::T
~ .... CD 0
AI -
U) Q)
...
..
RECEIVED 0
;0
-
JAN 1 3 2005 GJ
-
Z
PLANNING DEPARTMENT -
CllY OF CLEARWATER ...
T -
""~
~ii
~~
~,~
~.~
;A;
.,-~.,. ~
....,...... >- .J., '.
-.. "
.~,
. _'\... .~~~...~ t?
...... ,ji-Y
I
i!: UJI
- :1 I I ,I
I\)
~
at
CD
- )>
::J )> - ~
'"C - I\)
:c '"C "'0 0 0 '::T 0
CD .., Q) 0 CD ~
0 - en
3 ..,
co ~. QO 0 ::J Z 0
'::T 3 OJ CD CD 0 en
- 0 .., ;:+ 0
..... Q) c: Q) 0 '::T CD
a - ~
(1) ..... CD 0
3 '<" Q) Q)
en
en -
-
..,
CD
CD
-
r~.J
1""1
".... ,.
./ ,
~':J
r -~I
----I
j .
--- ~.
,~ -"/}1
J
OLJ,~_~j
1 "I' r
~:i4
RECEIVED
o
::0
-
G)
-
z
)::>
r-
JAN 1 3 2005
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
crrv OF CLEARWAlER
. ""'\)
0 )>
::J G) -f
r-+ 0-
::r I'\.) 0) 0- 0) m :E
CD "'0 ;:+ ..., ::J 0
:E 01 "'0 0 0) 0-
..., c.c ::r:
Q) ::J 0 ::J CD 0 0
r-+ X CJ) ...... c
CD ::r 3 0 0 (J) CJ)
..., CD ::J
r-+ 0) ::J C CD
0 c.c r-+ ::r en ::J CJ)
:;j CD r-+ CJ) ......
CJ) r-+ 0 ..., CD ...,
r-+ '< C CD 0
..., CD r-+
CD CJ) 3
CD CD r-+
r-+
G
;:0
CJ)
-
z
)>
r-
RECEIVED
JAN 1 3 2005
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
r-
\
I
-
Z.
11 W )> W
\"
0 0 ""C 0 I
c
\) .. ""C 0 0
~
::T a -u c
~ Q) co ~cn
L r-+ -- X Q) -, co
COCO -- - 0
(tl 3 3
-s ::T 3 0
r-+ Q) :J
\J.)lN 0 r-+ OJ co
)> 0 :J co -
~ - - c -
'< ~ 0
~ ~ r-+
g r
0
..
RECEIVED
"--'
:::::0
G)
Z
-.
JAN 13 2005
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF Cl.EARWAlER
~
-
, .
0 w :c
0 - 0
CD 0 0
:::J (J) - 0 ,...... c:
~ 0 c: ...... (J)
=R -u ..., CD
CD 0
Q) 0 0 Q) 3 0
,...... -
- :::J ::J
CD Q) 3
..., CD
o
::;0
-
G)
-
~
h
RECEIVED
JAN 1 3 2005
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
CllV OF CLEARWAlER
r-
;
I
o
c
00
CD
o
:J
~CD
c.nQ"
- r+
0-.,
0-,
00
+ 3
00 c..v
.00
C 0
OJ "'lJ
-, OJ
CD _
&3
~~
o C
:J ~
~ I
OJ OJ
r+"O
~"O
-,
o
x
-.
3
m
r+
CD
-
'<
r- '\
, -'
:'~J
RECEIVED
JAN 1 3 2005
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
cnv OF CLEARWATER
.
..
. ., .
,
A
II I
1 I
\ -
/
I . I
,j..~ '~
~' ~ J
I ; 1:
I J.. I
~/
.!. I
/
I IJ " I
. . , '. I
,.' \:
.
. I -- J
t ! . .11. -
"
. . I ,
tl~ III \. \, --- -
1\ " .
~ i; .. "I -
r. ~
t~ ". . J.-
.' It- J.
I ',' 91 ~ .
. ~
-
:JG)
(") Q)
:::r...,
CD Q)
encc
---+a CD
...,
o 0
3 0
(J)Q
r-+CIJ
...,
CD ~
CD ex>
r-+
;0
CD
:J C
o :J
< 0..
Q) CD
r-+
-. ...,
o
:J
Q
~~
-
LLI ~
O:i
LU-'
~
(J)
C
:J
en
CD
r-+
o
~
r-+r-
::T
CD
CD
:J
0..
o
---+a
-I
~
o
0..
o
o
...,
en
Z
o
;::la
::J
to-
20::-
Ww
~~
a::3f
~~
Co
(!)LL.
~O
Z~
~U
o
:::0
-
G)
-
Z
)::>
r
(-,......, .
. . ......", ~. . i.
>jf l' .
~~' i.
- t I,
,
,.
\,
t
\' .;.. ..
<4{ ( c
'~~;_#~.;'
_ . ,c . ....,,-
.t. f
;: t ~'f
) !~
I
,
,
0 ~
::3 ~
-I 0
:::r I\.)
o~ ~ CD (f) 0
~z '- rn (f) c ?J
0- > 0 -
-nZ ::z: r-+ :J G)
OCi)
.....0 ~ m .., en -
ii ~ CD z
- CD
r.,) ;;:i CD ):>
~~ (::)
(::) r-+
Con r-+ I
::;:1m
;o~ 0
(
-,
I
I
t
11
'.
'""
"-
'....
,.
"""'.
'..'
, '"
I
I .
,
--'~'.-.- -'~ .-..... ....,
OJ ~
C ~
--
- 0
r"+
r"+ ~
""tJ ;tJ 0 en
Oi
~Z e.- m en c 0
0- )> 0 r"+ :J ::0
"TIZ :z: ....,
o(i) -
~ m CD en GJ
i~ (..L:)
<:: CD CD -
r-.,) ~7
~~ ~ r"+
~ r"+
c.n m ):>
iilm C
~z I
-t
,>
,,'
:~. r'
. .
-::,
~
.
mJ
"""!.~""
, -
, , .
~
CJ) OJ w
-- c 0
c.
-- CD
CD -
r-+
o~ ^' ~ 0 (J)
~Z C-. rn Q) ::J C
0- > 0
"TIZ - :J
o(i) :z " r-+ 0
'-0 ........ rn 0 en ;0
~i c..:>
- CD -
~ <
i~ C) G)
C) ,.-+
c..n rn
n:lm -7
~z 0 ~
-t );>
r-
- 1
"
.~
j.~'" ", ,..:'.!
...-. . . . ' # :bj.. .':~ l~:JIiI~:~'
~t~,',{~f:i
.4
~~
:;.;;.:.:
,~~t~~1W 2
J
OJ
c:
-- ~
-
r-t- W
n~ r-t- 0
^' 0
~Z m CD
t.- en
o- J> 0
'TIZ en
OCi) z
--
~~ ~ m 0. c: 0
CJ,:l
;;gi ~ :<: CD ::J :;0
~~ ~
~ ~ -
c.n rn (J) G)
~m
.oZ C CD
... tu -7
r-t- ~--
- ....
^ ,'>
-
r-
\
\
.'," I J I
I I ,
I I I I
I I " '.
~ ~I',
-1o:!
o en
-'-0
..., Q)
o (")
a CD
0.-.
o ...,
o 0
., 3
o en
-. -.
:J'"o.
o CD
c :E
en Q)
CD "
o
en
(")
CD
o
Q)
z
en~
-0 ()
Qo ::::::!. 0
:J .,
(Q :J
CD
.,
oi
~z
0-
-n~
00
~~
~;o
~i
::tJ25
11
'"
rn
~O
~ m
:<
~rn
C
o
:::0
-
G)
-
- .,.
r _
~
r
."
(3
~ en
...
c " 0 0 0
c
0 A) tn 0 ...
- ::r
0 3 (') ..,
.., go (1) ~ (1)
0 OJ 0 (1) Q)
~ - - .., tn
C A) ...
en =:
-.
Q.
^' CD
o~ ~
m Q) 0
-
~z c.....- O ~ :::::0
)>
~z z -
o(i) ~ m G)
c C,.I.:l <:
~m
i ~ -7
c::t ~-
~~ c::t rn ~
c..n
i~ C r-
~- -- .-..
. ---"- ~
~
-=
~.J
)>
"0
"0
..,
0
~.
3
Q) 0 ~
CD 0 (..)
'< 0 0
.., ~
O~ :::tI 01 ..... m
ex> 0
rn en ::J
~z to- ::J ..... co
0- )> 0 0 CD 3 0
-n~ :z: =s-
CD CD m -;0
Pc ~ m en ..... ::J
il w <: .....
~ 0 l )
I c::;)
c::;) en
c.J'1 rn .....
..,
;om C CD
a1 CD
.....
~ )> )>
0
""C -- ~ I
- ..., I
:::J ""C W
en ('") I
('") ..., 0 I
,..... 0 0
..., ::T ~
oi ~ CD CD >< :::J
~z IT1 CD -- 0.. m G
c..- en 3
0- )> 0 :>J
"""z z ,..... -- :::J
OCil ,.....
......, Q) --
.-0 ~ m 0 co C/)
ii C;.:> ...,
:< 0 ,..... -
f'o.,) CD :::J 3
~ c::> Z
c::> 3
U'I rn - -- ):>
;:am C '< ::J Q)
~ CO :J I
-u --\.
0 W
en
0
""0 ^' .-+ 0
oi I\J
~z m 0 ::::0
'-- 0
o- J> :::J (J) -
-nZ Z CJ)
oCi) ~ m (J) c::: -
~~ CJ,.:l <: z
~I ......., r-+ ::J ):>
~
~ ITI ..., en
U"I I
~m C (1) CD
~~ (1)
r-+
r-+
(J)
-.
x Z
CD' -6- CD
CD ~
r-+ -c r-+
0 ..., (J) 0
o~ 0
~ ~ X C ...Jrr.
r-+ -. :::J m w
~z e.- rn ::r 3 en r-+ 0
o- J> 0 CD m ~ C.I
.,,~ ...Jrr.
Z CD
00 CJ) m ::.J
I-" m r-+ -
~I CJ.j CD '< :::J
'" <: CD co G)
~ c:::) 3
c:::) r-+ -.-
U1 m m Z
iilm
"'2:i C :::J )::>
I
r
. t
"
~f .'
I .
~
r.
,
i }~
)>
-
-
:::r ;c ~
Q) CD 0
..., :J C -... 0
0- en
0 r-+
~~ ^' CJ) < :J c: :::r 0-
m c Q) 0- :::J CD 0 C
0% <<- CD CJ) 0
"T'IZ > 0 ~ ~ CD ' ,I
00 z: -- ..., CD ...,
~i ~ m 0 :J en ")
C,l.:) ~
:<: 0 ::J -
;el ~ 0- ?
c;:) Z
~ ~ CD . -
rn )/
;om 0 0
! C ,
...., ;::1
=:T
g~ ^'
o~ c...... rn
'TIZ )> 0
o(i) Z
i~ ~ ITI
;e~ ~ -
~31! ~ ~
'" ~ e:J
r
en 0=
c: (1)
&~
~ I
en Q.)
....,
0..
~
~
o
'"
en
c:
::J
en
CD
r-+
o
?
- -
G)
-
-7
.:::..-
):> I
r
~
.~
r
Q ?
:< ~
o -
'102'
orne;;
r-::nQr>
f!1Sa
i)orn
~[J]~
.h r-
rrt 0
:b ~
",
2
-I
,
J '
r;=: D I
\,~-
o.l_,..._....a_
._--~-,-
w.~~_...---......
::::::t..:: Z90CC "a~O'Lt )Ur"m O"WdROd
__............. .L3:nus No.JY30 QOtC
':J.,NNlJ 'Ul-InaOw"1W'Xcldl --:;.';;;;~~-; ':11 ~ '.LH3"dO'L~^,,1tI SNSI.
.IN! S- U.V[:x:"';S Y" :JV,W'''''I Ilr PI
;~ i j '.
t t " t e '~'i
~ . . . ~ A "'ar~
p " E " h;!
" B " ~~"i
e < ~ "
. . . . : ; B .
i
~ t ~ ...~ ~
~; 0:
5 ~'" ~~
..a 8 ~ ~ 'z i !!~!!:!!:!:H!!:!!!~!:~m~: ~ ~ ~! ~
~ " i~ " . < "
i;~J · . ~ r a ~ .~ ~~ :;
ll~~ ; ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.~~~~~.~~~~~~ o~
~" . ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~*h *~~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ;! ~~ ;l! :l
< . f< ~ ~ i .
'~i!~ H ~ i ~~~~~f~~hHIHlil~i~UI~ ~~ r 't
:I !! .il ~<' ~ 0 l ~~ ~~ ~~
~> ~ig ~ $ . ! :;
~~:u .. ~ ~~~~cc~~~~c:ctc~c~~~r~~=~ccc ~~ ' ~ 0
1~!8!'~S8!8!.8~8!.!8V!~;8~a8 ~ :l\ ~.
~~~gg ~. ~~; ~ ~ ~_ lit .. ~ .~...", ""_"'t: JI ......JI:, ~e ~~ ' ~ ~~ ~
~a '~ ~ ~ F g
s_.... r r ~f f i5
0; '1 ., '1 0; V ~~ ~; u ~
1i 5 .. '- " e '- " .. . ~l! ~f i
ji . I I I I I I I i ." ~l -- ~~
~ i ~ ; ~ ~ ~~ J ~ ~
~ ~ ~ !I E ~, .( .~
~ ~~ ~~ F
Ii! .. .. .. .. .. .. g ~. ~ ~
. . <l "< ~.....
~ ~ ~ .. a .. .. .. ~~ ~<
~ ~~ ~~ t. ~~
~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~~ i
i: ' , ~ . ~ . . ~ ~s H
" . ~ . ! ! ~ -.. 1< i
~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ i : Q . ~b H :~ If
~~ H .. " .. ~ .. ~i
a. ~ 2 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ !i ~ ~: ~~ L ~
~ ~ = ~
( 1If/<1 .0. )
o
~
<>
~
i,
HH
H J _P_~
, I .
s x .q
--.~
r-
J
.2)
u=u
=
~
J [FUll
_:2]
VOll101.l
~
d
~
~
~
!
...
~!
".
",'
; . . ;;' I
d~ ; ;H
~!.! ,:~~,
~~! i
5 ~ ~:; ~
~ =- ~ 2 e
l~ ~.~.. -
'_I~..~" H
r~ ~ ~. d ~ ~
i~ ~~-=::l:;.CI~
i~ ~ ~! i
i~ ~ ~ ~ g
~
t
r-
dl ~
i~ ;~ r
. ".,
~i ~i!
~
'I
~l :t
'J~
1: j
l{ ,
J '" ~ !
,. J 0 -
:1 J S 0 ih
~H
:;"'--.;,.~ 3'
~~~'ll~ Y
Ji'-)(~ ~-I
ill<
.'l"
~!=P:
;\
Ii
li~! ,,!
'I :1; \!i
to, 0 "'.
~!' :ptj-
~ ~_..I~~
I
~~
~i
t!'
..{ f/ (7
,
cY..x: '
;.z":f, --
'IcYf/.:r - ~
~_. <~
il .~
."'.,'1'" _
~~ -
l i ~
.
~
l)
.I. ,;; .. tn
III i
Nl'1d 3dV:)SONI'1
1IiIIl'...:1I>....-,:,.,.
=:: ~ mKltt VQJlIcru 'HJYJB O.NYd"Od
_~.......,., .&.:33H.l.S NO:)V]8 BOtE
'>HHl.J ';jf"l-l~""-';:';;';;:~ :)-'1 o.ul3"d013A30 :JNSJ_
JNI<'~.HVD. )<,'<.,V ~:JV AV7 ~ I.U-A~
. .
,
H
'.
. .
I I
~I
~
~~
'I ~I
,.
i
II JJ]
:.~
=
~ 1I J1 J]
~ ~ ')
il~ I \ )
I ~ !i'~i [I ILlJ
, o ~..
',1 hWI
I " JI' J
J JI jl j r-
;'11)1
11 :JH Ii
~I!iur~l
a.. t! ."~I~
.. ~ '.
--
VGlH013 'H3.LVAlHV31J
llLlll1lt(lv.1
, i
. i
~ :I
:i
:,
.,.
~
"
,
/
/
, /
I!. ,,/
,. . I /
1.1 ~" -/
,~l!V'~/
\~4~.
':4~I~':
~J~+:
, .
I I 1-"'
I' I'
I! I!
~J:;
I 'II"
I III
'll!i,
;
; : -: ~~~!!:::l~
! :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::(::
_--:--""4
- - ~.
."
. .
<I;...~ 1,
'..
.;.
l<
-',
.f
.."
k/
. ./.- I'l bf, "
F..)
I I
~~'
--- -, )
~
co
I
l--
U
<::)
. --,
~-
'- -
, ~ ~
. .
I .
~ r . r-
~
o S
l'; '"
o ~
~
'"
~
z
UJ cr
:;: u.,
u. f-
a <1:
(/)
LJ r~
w'
'5~
a:u
w
(j)(s
'.
bl
-,