The URL can be used to link to this page

CPA2015-04001Clearwater City Commission Work session Item #: 9 . Agenda Cover Memorandum Final Agenda Item #: Meeting Date: 1/19/2016 SUBJECT/RECOMMENDATION: Approve amendments to the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use, Transportation, Coastal Management, Intergovernmental Coordination, and Capital Improvements Elements goals, objectives and policies regarding numerous provisions, including: repealing transportation concurrency and establishing a new Mobility Management System; allowing for non-contiguous annexations; encouraging strategies to reduce flood risk in coastal areas; and updating the Capital Improvements Revenue and Expenditures Summaries, consistent with State Statutes; and pass Ordinance No. 8805-16 on first reading. (CPA2015-04001) SUMMARY: This proposed ordinance contains numerous amendments to the goals, objectives and policies of the Future Land Use, Transportation, Coastal Management, Intergovernmental Coordination, and Capital Improvements Elements of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. The most substantial topic addressed is the proposed deletion of the transportation concurrency requirement and the creation of a Mobility Management System based on the Pinellas County Mobility Plan. The proposed amendments address changes made to the Community Planning Act in 2011, which amended 163.3180, Florida Statutes, by repealing certain state mandated concurrency requirements, including transportation concurrency. To address this change in the state statutes, the Pinellas County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) coordinated with the various local governments to develop an alternative approach to transportation concurrency which would also further the development of a countywide multi -modal transportation system that could better accommodate travel options other than the personal automobile. This work resulted in the Pinellas County Mobility Plan which was approved by the MPO in 2013. The proposed amendments will ensure that the City's Comprehensive Plan and concurrency management system is consistent with the countywide approach to mobility management and the Pinellas County Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance (TIFO), which is currently being renamed to the Multi -Modal Impact Fee Ordinance as part of Pinellas County's various amendments. The County's amendments are anticipated to be adopted on March 29, 2016, and as such Ordinance No. 8805-16 will be amended on second reading to update the Pinellas County ordinance number as the County does not assign ordinance numbers until after adoption. In addition to the above, staff is also proposing the following: • Coastal Management Element: Add development and redevelopment strategies and policies to help reduce the risk of flood for coastal properties; • Capital Improvements Element: Reflect updated data for level of service standards; update the Capital Improvement Program Revenue Summary and the Capital Improvement Program Expenditure Summary • Future Land Use Element: Update outdated language; add new policy regarding non-contiguous Type A Enclave annexations; and • Minor formatting changes to bring consistency between all of the Elements. Further detail on the proposed amendment is provided in the attached staff report and Ordinance No. 8805-16. The Community Development Board (CDB) reviewed the proposed amendment at its meeting on December 15, 2015 and unanimously recommended the amendment for approval. As this is a text amendment to the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan, review and approval by the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity is required. As part of the state review, the proposed amendments will be SA\Planning Department\Comprehensive Plan\2015 Amendments\CPA2015-04001, Mobility Plan & Misc\CPA2015-04001 CC Cover Memo.doc transmitted to the various State agencies and Pinellas County for review prior to second reading (adoption) by City Council, which is anticipated to occur in April. Attachments: Ordinance 8805-16 Staff Report SAPlanning Department\Comprehensive Plan\2015 Amendments\CPA2015-04001, Mobility Plan & Misc\CPA2015-04001 CC Cover Memo.doc ORDINANCE NO. 8805-16 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER (THE CITY), FLORIDA, AMENDING THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN BY AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT UPDATING THE CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND ALLOWING FOR NON-CONTIGUOUS ANNEXATIONS; BY AMENDING THE TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT ESTABLISHING A MOBILITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND REPEALING TRANSPORTATION CONCURRENCY, ESTABLISHING MULTI -MODAL DESIGN FEATURES, AND ENSURING THE CITY'S COORDINATION WITH THE METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION AND THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION; BY AMENDING THE COASTAL MANGEMENT ELEMENT BY REMOVING TRAFFIC FROM LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS AND ADDING POLICIES ENCOURAGING STRATEGIES AND ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS THAT REDUCE FLOOD RISK IN COASTAL AREAS; BY AMENDING THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT REMOVING REFERENCE TO ROAD LEVEL OF SERVICE; BY AMENDING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT REMOVING TRANSPORTATION LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS AND UPDATING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND EXPENDITURE AND REVENUE SUMMARIES; UPDATING VARIOUS TERMS AND REFERENCES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act of Florida empowers and requires the City Council of the City of Clearwater to plan for the future development and growth of the City, and to adopt and periodically amend the Comprehensive Plan, including elements and portions thereof; and WHEREAS, Florida House Bill 7207, also known as the Community Planning Act, was signed into law in 2011; and WHEREAS, the Community Planning Act removed State requirements for local government implementation of transportation concurrency management systems; and WHEREAS, the City of Clearwater participated in a multi jurisdictional Mobility Plan Task Force, facilitated by the Pinellas County Metropolitan Planning Organization, to develop a framework for a countywide approach to implementation of a mobility management system in place of transportation concurrency; and WHEREAS, the Pinellas County Metropolitan Planning Organization created the Pinellas County Mobility Plan to replace transportation concurrency; and WHEREAS, The Pinellas County Mobility Plan is applicable countywide; and WHEREAS, the City of Clearwater desires to replace transportation concurrency with a mobility management system approach that is multi -modal, and designed to better support redevelopment and associated transportation, land use, intergovernmental, and capital improvement goals; and Ordinance No. 8805-16 WHEREAS, additional amendments are proposed to address an Interfocal Service Boundary Agreement (ISBA) the city and Pinellas. County entered into which allows voluntary annexations of noncontiguous properties within "Type A" enclaves, as defined in the ISBA; and WHEREAS, such ISBA should be recognized in the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds it necessary, desirable and proper to adopt the amendments to the objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan in order to reflect changing conditions; now, therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. That Policy A.2.2.6 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Element, page A-10, be amended to read as follows: A.2.2.6 The Community Development Code shall provide for safe on-site traffic circulation and connections to adjacent arterial and collector streets consistent with Florida Department of TransportationLlnstitute of Traffic Engineers design guidelines, and other applicable roadway design standards, policies, and guidelines. Section 2. That Goal A.4 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Element, and its Objective and Policies, pages A-11 through A-12, be amended to read as follows: A.4 GOAL - THE CITY SHALL A1NOOT-PEP"A1�„n-T-DEVELOPMENT OCCUR UNLESS AN ADEQUATE LEVEL OF SERVICE AVAILABLE E TO ACCOMMODATE THE (IMPACTS . OF DEVELOPMENT. AREAS IN WHICH THE IMPAGT OF EXISTING DEVELOPMENT EXCEEDS THE DESIRED LEVELS A1C SERVICE WII 1 BE UPGRADED CONSISTENT >r �v--vi—vcrc�Tv�m �r� r WITH THE TARGET DATES FOR INIFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDED DED IN THE APPLICABLECTIONAL PLAN ELE4M JTWORK TOWARD A LAND USE PATTERN THAT CAN BE SUPPORTED BY THE AVAILABLE COMMUNITY AND PUBLIC FACILITIES THAT WOULD BE REQUIRED TO SERVE THE DEVELOPMENT. A.4.1 Objective - > wateF,seweF, gaFbage colleetion, and dFainage systeFns and shall PFGV"de data on sub seeters of the City an which seweGe defleiienGies exist OF on wh*Gh se " idequate to seFve existing and planned new development. This level of seFvore status woll be rensmdeFed and made paFt of the staff Fer. at the tome -e€ zoning, site plan,OF plat pFoval The -level -of niteriRg system shall be adjusted, at a i i ,nnually to deteMine adequacy of seMGe eapaeity. The City's Concurrency Management System will ensure the compatibility of all proposed development with the capacities of the existing and planned support facilities for which a level of service has been adopted. v;tems abode adopted levels permission to nreneed with the__deyelopmernGenGUFFent With the impaets of i development.intedURM the City has assWed that adequate M be avamla 2 Ordinance No. 8805-16 Policies A.4.1.1 Hewever, developmeRt eFdeFs Fray he phased E)r ethepNise modified GGRSiL+ieYf} The Concurrency Management System shall ensure proposed development is in conformance with existing and planned support facilities for which a level of service standard has been adopted and that such facilities and services are available, at the adopted level of service standards, concurrent with the impacts of development. A.4.1.2 The City's Concurrency Management System shall include, at minimum, level of service standards for parkland, potable water, sanitary sewer, solid waste, and stormwater. A.4.1.3 The City, when making decisions on requests to amend the Future Land Use Map or the Zoning Atlas (other than decisions on appropriate locations for mixed-use or transit oriented development), shall review the potential impact on the transportation system by considering the following: a. Ability of the surrounding existing and planned transportation network to meet the mobility objectives of the Comprehensive Plan: b. Capacity of the surrounding existing and planned transportation network to accommodate any projected additional demand: and c. Extent to which the proposed Future Land Use Map amendment or rezoning furthers the intent of the Comprehensive Plan to improve mobility. A.4.1.24 The City shall recognize the overriding Constitutional principle that private property shall not be taken without due process of law and the payment of just compensation, which principle is restated in Section 163.3194 (4) (a), Florida Statutes. Section 3. That Policy A.5.4.8 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Element, page A-14, be amended to read as follows: A.5.4.8 Study the e6tablishment of traR6POFtatiOR GORGUFFeRGy alteMatives Implement a Mobility Management System as detailed in the City's Community Development Code, to support higher densities along redevelopment corridors and in activity centers. Section 4. That Policy A.7.1.2 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Element, page A-24, be amended to read as follows: Ordinance No. 8805-16 A.7.1.2 When evaluating and prioritizing areas to annex, consideration should be given to the following: e Whether property was given high priority in the City's Sewer System Expansion Feasibility Study Update completed in 2002 2011; Section 5. That a new Policy A.7.2.4 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Element, page A-25, be added, with subsequent Policies renumbered, and that Policy A.7.2.6, as renumbered, be amended to fix a typographical error: A.7.2.4 Allow voluntary annexations for noncontiguous properties that are within an enclave as defined by Section 171.032(13)(a), Florida Statutes ("Type A" enclaves). A.7.2.45 Promote economic development programs and activities to businesses within the unincorporated areas of the Clearwater Planning Area. A.7.2.56 Continue to work with property owners and Pinellas County to permit development activities in the County prior to the effective date of annexation provided the proposed development complies with the provisions of the City of Clearwater Development Code. Section 6. That the Transportation Needs Summary section of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element, page B-1, be amended to read as follows: Traffic Circulation & Mobility Multi -modal transportation improvements to Clearwater Beach should continue to be planned and/or utilized to alleviate traffic congestion and parking demands on the Memorial Causeway and the beach. Access management to improve traffic flow will continue to be an important issue in development reviews, with particular emphasis on congested links. Belleair Road (CR462) and Clearwater Memorial Causeway (SR60) are physically and/or environmentally constrained and will Gentinue to epeFate below the aGGeptable levels of seFViGe. The City will continue to work with Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), Tampa Bay Area Regional Transportation Authority (TBARTA), Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority (PSTA) and other agencies to ud 4 Ordinance No. 8805-16 Section 7. That the Traffic Circulation section of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element, page B-3, be renamed as follows: TRAFFIC CIRCULATION & MOBILITY Section 8. That Goal B.1 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element, page B-3, be amended and a new Objective B.1.1 and its Policies be added to read as follows, with subsequent Objectives and Policies renumbered: B.1 GOAL - THE TRAFFIC CIRCULATION SYSTEM THE CITY SHALL PROVIDE FOR T#€ A SAFE,_CONVENIENT AND ENERGY EFFICIENT OE' € o; -PEOPLE MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM THAT SERVES TO INCREASE MOBILITY, EFFICIENTLY UTILIZE ROADWAY CAPACITY, REDUCE THE INCIDENCE OF SINGLE -OCCUPANT VEHICLE TRAVEL, REDUCE THE CONTRIBUTION TO AIR POLLUTION FROM MOTOR VEHICLES, AND IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF LIFE TO THE CITIZENS OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER. B.1.1 Objective – Maintain the major road network performance within the City while furthering development of a multi -modal transportation system that increases mobility for pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit users as well as for motorists. Policies B.1.1.1 The City shall implement the Mobility Manaqement System within the City's Community Development Code. The impacts of land development projects shall be managed through the application of Transportation Element policies, through requirements of the Community Development Code, and through the site plan review process. The Mobility Management System shall address the following: a. All development projects generating new peak hour trips shall be subject to Payment of a multi -modal impact fee. b. Development proiects that generate between 51 and 300 new peak hour trips of deficient roads shall be classified as tier 1 and required to submit a transportation management plan (TMP) designed to address their impacts while increasing mobility and reducing demand for single occupant vehicle travel. c. Development projects that generate more than 300 new peak hour trips on deficient roads shall be classified as tier 2, required to conduct a traffic impact study, and submit an accompanying report and TMP based on the report findings. d. Multi -modal impact fee assessments may be applied as credit toward the cost of a TMP. e. A traffic study and/or TMP for a development project not impacting a deficient road corridor shall be required if necessary to address the impact of additional trips generated by the project on the surrounding traffic circulation system. Ordinance No. 8805-16 B.1.1.2 The City shall continue to use roadway levels of service for planning purposes. 13.1.1.3 The Capital Improvements Element shall include reference to "deficient" roadways, as identified through the most recent version of the annual Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Level of Service Report, including facilities operating at peak hour level of service (LOS) E and F and/or volume -to -capacity (v/c) ratio 0.9 or greater without a mitigating improvement scheduled for construction within three years. B.1.1.4 The City shall utilize multi -modal impact fee revenue to fund multi -modal improvements to local, county, or state facilities that are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan as well as the MPO Long Range Transportation Plan 2040. 13.1.1.5 The City shall work cooperatively with the MPO and other local governments to complete the biennial update of the Multi -modal Impact Fee Ordinance through the MPO planning process. B.1.1.6 The City shall continue to work with the Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority (PSTA) to increase the efficiency of the fixed -route system by encouraging mass transit use through the application of the Mobility Management System and the City's site plan review process. Section 9. That Objective B.1.2 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element, as renumbered by this ordinance, page B-3, and its Policies be amended, and Policies B.1.2.3 through 13.1.2.8 be added to read as follows, with subsequent Objectives and Policies renumbered: ' B.1.42 Objective — . Future improvements to arterial and collector streets shall be context -sensitive by planning and designing the roadway based on the existing context of the surrounding built environment and the planned land use vision. B.1.42.1 The City shall continue to administer access management and right-of-way requirements through the Community Development Code. 13.1.42.2 The City will promote programs that ensure physical safety of non -motorized transportation users in accordance with the City's Shifting Gears: Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan. B.1.2.3 The City will operate, maintain, and improve the City transportation system consistent with the Florida Department of Transportation's (FDOT) Complete Streets Policy. B.1.2.4 The City shall coordinate efforts with FDOT to incorporate bicycle and pedestrian - friendly provisions in the design and construction of expansion and resurfacing projects on State roads, where feasible. 13.1.2.5 The City shall require land development projects to make adequate provisions for bicycle parking and storage as appropriate. Ordinance No. 8805-16 B.1.2.6 The City shall include sidewalks where feasible alongside roadways scheduled for resurfacing. B.1.2.7 The City shall install landscaping along sidewalks using tree canopy, where feasible, to provide shaded areas for pedestrians. B.1.2.8 The City shall incorporate livable community requirements such as Objective A.6.8 and its Policies to proposed developments or redevelopments. Section 10. That Objective B.1.3 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element, pages B-3 and B-4, and its Policies be amended as follows, with subsequent Objectives and Policies renumbered: B.1.34 Objective - The City will continue to improvements, to provide timely status Policies monitor traffic counts, accidents, and road evaluation of level of service conditions -16F B.1.34.1 The City will continue to review potential trips generated by Rrequests for amendment to the Future Land .Use Map will have an analysis of tFaffiG impa B.1.34.32 The GGRGUFFeRGY Mobility mManagement sSystem will be e^"�ed applied through improved departmental coordination_ Section 11. That Policies B.1.4.1 through B.1.4.7 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element, pages B-4 and B-5, be amended to read as follows, with subsequent Objectives and Policies renumbered: Policies B.1.45.1 The City shall continue to review trips generated by land development projects through the Mobility Management System. B.1.45.2 For those roads which are not currently operating at an acceptable LOS, or which do not have PFGgFaFnrned tG upgFade sePViGe to aR aGGeptable level a mitigating improvement scheduled for construction within three years, the seeoun=epsy Mobility mManagement sSystem shall be used to monitor traffic growth, Ordinance No. 8805-16 with the dual intent of maintaining average operating speeds and restricting the aggregate and individual trips generated by development in the City limits. 6.1.45.53 Faval by the State, i Redevelopment and/or revitalization projects shall be coordinated with the FDOT and the Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO) to assess impacts on US 19. 6.1.45.7-4 The City shall cooperate with the MPO to ensure consistency between. comprehensive plan amendments and the Pinellas MPO Long. Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) 2025 2040. Section 12. That Objective B.1.5 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element, page B-5, and its Policies be deleted: 8 Ordinance No. 8805-16 Section 13. That Objective B.2.1 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element, page B-6, be amended, and Policy 13.2.1.2 be added to read as follows: B.2.1 Objective - Roadway improvements to obtain desiFed Levels of Sewirse must be included in State, County, and City capital budgets. The City shall actively participate, on a continuing basis, with both the staff and elected official support, in the preparation, adoption and implementation of transportation plans and expenditure programs of the M.P.O. MPO, P.STAB PSTA, Board of County Commissioners, and the €�O.T FDOT. B.2.1.1 The City shall review and comment on the proposed capital improvement programs and provide input to the adopting agencies relative to consistency with Clearwater's Comprehensive Plan. 13.2.1.2 The City shall provide the MPO with available up-to-date traffic data, such as signal timings and traffic counts to assist with level -of -service monitoring and development of the MPO's Long Range Transportation Plan. Section 14. That Objective B.2.3 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element, page B-8, be amended, and that Policy B.2.3.2 be deleted as follows: B.2.3 Objective - The City of Clearwater shall annually update the City's a -ad coordinate with and provide input in the update of the Metropolitan Planning Organization's (MPO) Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) involving County and State roads. Mr.Mullen Booth Read at EnteFpFise Road A 9 Ordinance No. 8805-16 Policies 13.2.3.1 Road improvements which are currently programmed for construction should be continued in the Capital Improvement Element of the jurisdiction having operational responsibility for those roads. Section 15. That Objective B.4.4 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element, page B-14, and Policies 13.4.4.1 and B.4.4.2 be amended to read as follows: 13.4.4 Objective — The City shall participate and cooperate with agencies and committees to enhance and promote the use of mass t anstt public transportation system. B.4.4.1 Clearwater shall coordinate with PSTA and the MPO in the development of the Five -Year Transit Development PFegrar Plan to addFess +,-.,.,�;+ needs--Gensieient with adeptedIever-of service pelTGies and tFansit planR*Rg guidelines. identify and include transit improvements that benefit the City. 13.4.4.2 Clearwater will cooperate with PSTA and the MPO to GGiRGide with the *MPFE)vement detailed On the yeaF 2010 and 2016 1`1106t GUF 4 n of the I ORg Range Mass TFansit PIaR6. identify transit improvements that could be incorporated as part of corridor plans or development proiects. Section 16. That Objective E.1.5 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Coastal Management Element, page E-5, be amended to read as follows: E.1.5 Objective - Llevel of service standards as defined in the functional elements of the Comprehensive Plan (tr-afG, public utilities, recreation and open space), are established and are recognized as applicable to the coastal storm area. Section 17. That Objective E.1.6 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Coastal Management Element, page E-5, be amended to read as follows, and that new Policies E.1.6.2 and E.1.6.3 be added to read as follows, with subsequent Policies renumbered: E.1.6 Objective - Development and Firedevelopment areas established in the coastal storm area should address the needs and opportunities unique to those locations. E.1.6.1 Redevelopment proposals and plans shall be reviewed for compliance with the goals, objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan and other appropriate plans including Beach by Design: A Preliminary Design for Clearwater Beach and Design Guidelines and the City's NFIP Community Rating System Floodplain Management Plan. 10 Ordinance No. 8805-16 E.1.6.2 New development or redevelopment is encouraged to include principles, strategies, or engineering solutions that: a. reduce the flood risk in the coastal areas which results from high -tide events, storm surge, flash floods, stormwater runoff, and the related impacts of sea -level rise; b. may reduce losses due to flooding and claims made under flood insurance policies issued in this state. E.1.6.3 New development or redevelopment shall be consistent with, or more stringent than, the flood -resistant construction requirements in the Florida Building Code and applicable flood plain management regulations set forth in 44 C.F.R. part 60. Section 18. That the Intergovernmental Coordination Needs Summary of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Intergovernmental Coordination Element, page H-1, be amended to read as follows: Intergovernmental Coordination Needs Summary The following summarizes the Intergovernmental Coordination Element: Road improvements, and backlogged facilities, and levels of seFViGe need the coordination of all jurisdictions along the corridor in establishing and maintaining appropriate land use and traffic policies. Coordination with the Florida Department of Transportation(FDOT) is also a major issue to be addressed by continued participation in the M -P -O- process. In addition, Clearwater should continue to be involved with the Tampa Bay Area Regional Transportation Authority (TBARTA) planning process. Section 19. That Objective H.2.2 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Intergovernmental Coordination Element, page H-4, and its Policies be amended, and Policy H.2.2.3 be added to read as follows: H.2.2 Objective - The City shall adopt the F,--�T. MOT level of ce^•ii^e standards for State primary and secondary arterials as they may be modified by additional service designations (special transportation areas, etc.) approved by F.ter: MOT and shall use intergovernmental coordination agreements to secure maximum City control over access and management of roads in Clearwater. Policies H.2.2.1 The City shall continue to cooperate with X8 -0-T. FDOT in all matters of traffic signal access requests that affect the State highway system. H.2.2.2 Clearwater shall provide -D-9-T. FDOT with annual reports that document efforts at concurrency management on State roads. H.2.2.3 The City will consult with FDOT with regard to the access onto State facilities for new land development projects. 11 Ordinance No. 8805-16 Section 20. That the Capital Improvements Element Needs Summary of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element, page 1-1, be deleted as follows: Section 21. That Objective 1.1.1 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element, page 1-2, and Policies 1.1.1.2, 1.1.1.5, 1.1.1.9, 1.1.1.11, and 1.1.1.12 be amended to read as follows: 1.1.1 Objective — The Capital Improvements Element (CIE) of the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Clearwater shall be reviewed arnd-ado annually in light of the needs addressed in various elements of the Comprehensive Plan including the fifth year needs of eaGh subsequent adoption. 1.1.1.2 The Aannual JJupdate to the Five -Year Schedule of Capital Improvements !MPFE)vements File is hereby incorporated by reference and is located following aPolicy 1.1.6.3. 12 Ordinance No. 8805-16 1.1.1.5 Capital improvements projects proposed for inclusion in the schedule of capital improvements should be evaluated on the following criteria and considered in the priority listed below: 1.1.1.9 As stated in the City Charter, the total indebtedness of the City of Clearwater, which for the purpose of this limitation shall include revenue, refunding and improvement bonds, of the G;+„ of GleaFwate shall not exceed twenty percent (20%) of the current assessed valuation of all real property located in the City�e. Ttotal budgeted expenditures in any fiscal year shall not exceed the total estimated revenue plus any unencumbered funds carried forward from a prior fiscal year. 1.1.1.11 YeaFWeFkPF9gFaFn,2011 , adopted GR jUly 1, . The City will coordinate with the FDOT and the Pinellas County MPO to promote the inclusion of projects in the plans and programs of these agencies into the Five -Year Schedule of Capital Improvements. Section 22. That Policy 1.1.3.1 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element, page 1-5, be amended to read as follows: 1.1.3.1 Essential public facilities as defined in this plan include and are limited to those facilities relating to sanitary sewer, solid waste, stormwater, potable water, tFaespeFtatien, and parks and recreation systems. Section 23. That Policy 1.1.3.3 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element, page 1-5, be amended to read as follows: 1.1.3.3 If it is determined that sufficient capacity of essential public facilities will be available concurrent with the impacts of a proposed development, a final development order may be issued in accordance with the following schedule: Section 24. That Policy 1.1.3.5 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element, page 1-6, be amended to read as follows: 1.1.3.5 An applicant for a development order may request a determination of the capacity of the essential public facilities as part of the review and approval of the development order provided that: 13 Ordinance No. 8805-16 (c) Whenever an applicant's pro rata share of a public facility is less than the full cost of the facility; the City shall do one of the following: contract with the applicant for the full cost of the facility including terms regarding reimbursement of the applicant for costs in excess of the applicant's pro rata share; or ii. obtain assurances similar to those in subsection (b) above from other sources; or Section 25. That Table: Summary of Level of Service Standards in Policy 1.1.3.7 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element, page 1-7, be amended to read as follows: Table: Summary of Level of Service Standards Facilities Element LOS Standard TFanspeFtat per-ta#f Sanitary Sewer Utilities Average of 127gallons per person per day GPCD Solid Waste Utilities Average Solid Waste Generator Rate of 7.12 pounds per capita per da Stormwater Utilities Design storm: 10 — year storm frequency for all new Street developments for street drainage, storm systems, and culverts 25 — year storm frequency with positive outfall ... basin time f9F mnier StOFFn of .*for all new developments for channels and detention areas with outfalls 50 — year storm frequency when no autfall and doSGhaFge is te street Fight of *for all new developments for detention areas without outfalls 100 — year storm frequency wheR RG eatfatl *for all new developments for detention areas without outfalls which overflow onto private property when capacity is exceeded * Design standards for stormwater quality treatment/storage quantity shall conform to the current SWFWMD requirement [Presently being the SCS Unit Hydrograph design method, using the design storm frequency and a twenty-four 24 hour duration for sites ten 14 Ordinance No. 8805716 Section 26. That a new Policy 1.1.4.8 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element, page 1-8, be added to read as follows: Policies 1.1.4.8 The City will continue to use roadway level of service for planning purposes. Section 27. That Policy 1.1.5.1 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element, page 1-8, be deleted as follows, and that Policy 1.1.5.4, page 1-9, be amended to read as follows, with Policies renumbered: Policies 1.1.5.21 The City shall recognize the overriding Constitutional principle that private property shall not be taken without due process of law and the payment of just compensation, which principle is restated in Section 163.3194 (4) (a) Florida Statutes. 1.1.5.32 In the planning of capital improvements, the City shall consider the effect of such improvement on local resources listed on the National Register of Historic Places with the intent to preserve the integrity of such places. 1.1.5.43 In the planning of capital improvements, the City shall consider the effects of controversial public facilities, such as landfills, prisons, and power lines, with the intent of locating them in areas where they may best serve their purpose and have the fewest negative impacts. 15 Ordinance No. 8805-16 (10) acres or more, and the rational design method for sites under ten 10 acres]. Potable Water Utilities Average Water Consumption Rate and Natural 120 gallons per capita per day at a pressure of Ground Water 40-45 psi.* Aquifer *Continue to maintain water consumption of Recharge one hundred twenty (120) GPCPD or less as per the conditions set forth by Clearwater's Water Use Permit. Hurricane Coastal 16 hours (out of county for a category 5 -storm Evacuation Management event as measured on the Saffir-Simpson scale Parks Recreation 4 acres of parkland per one thousand (1,000) and Open persons for Citywide application Space Section 26. That a new Policy 1.1.4.8 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element, page 1-8, be added to read as follows: Policies 1.1.4.8 The City will continue to use roadway level of service for planning purposes. Section 27. That Policy 1.1.5.1 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element, page 1-8, be deleted as follows, and that Policy 1.1.5.4, page 1-9, be amended to read as follows, with Policies renumbered: Policies 1.1.5.21 The City shall recognize the overriding Constitutional principle that private property shall not be taken without due process of law and the payment of just compensation, which principle is restated in Section 163.3194 (4) (a) Florida Statutes. 1.1.5.32 In the planning of capital improvements, the City shall consider the effect of such improvement on local resources listed on the National Register of Historic Places with the intent to preserve the integrity of such places. 1.1.5.43 In the planning of capital improvements, the City shall consider the effects of controversial public facilities, such as landfills, prisons, and power lines, with the intent of locating them in areas where they may best serve their purpose and have the fewest negative impacts. 15 Ordinance No. 8805-16 1.1.5.,54 The City will require ,�o•, Fs development t thFeshold has beeR met be consistent with the provisions of the Mobility Management System established in Goal B.1 of the Transportation Element. Section 28. That the Annual Update to the Capital Improvements Element of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element, page 1-10 through 1-14, be amended to read as follows: FY20105/146 ANNUAL UPDATE TO THE SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT In the following, the concurrency -related public facilities (i.e., solid waste, potable water, stormwater, sanitary sewer; and parkland and are evaluated to determine that the City's adopted level of service (LOS) standards are currently being met and will be adequate to serve approved and planned development over the next five years. The adopted Clearwater Capital Improvement Program, FY2010/1 1r-FY2015-16 - FY2019/20 indicates the timing, location and funding of capital projects needed to meet future public facilities' demands and demonstrate that the Comprehensive Plan is financially feasible. Current populations (2806 2015 estimate): 110,831 110,679 Projected 2018 populations (per Future Land use Element): 120,028 SOLID WASTE: Current Capacity: 7.12 lbs per capita per day Current demand: "4.89 lbs per capita per day €*sGaIYeaF PFejested Der s"ape Pejerted Capae+t Nor Surplus t) 2009/40 549 742 4-93 204-0� 742 4-93 2444/4-2 549 7-42 4-.93 2 Q9Z 5.49 742 4.93 244-3 a 5-a s 742 4-.93 Totals (204344) 5.49 742 4-93 Fiscal Year Projected Demand (lbs per capita per da Projected Capacity (lbs per capita per da Surplus Deficit 2015/16 4.89 7.12 2.23 2016/17 4.89 7.12 2.23 2017/18 4.89 7.12 2.23 2018/19 4.89 7.12 2.23 2019/20 4.89 7.12 2.23 Totals 2019/20 4.89 7.12 2.23 Total solid waste generated by the City in 2008 (in tons) 104,898 16 Ordinance No. 8805-16 Current pounds of solid waste per capita per day: 6494,89 *The current capacity is based on the City's solid waste LOS standard. Capacity is actually greater since the City's Solid Waste Department is able to dispose of all waste produced within the City, as it coordinates with Pinellas County and other private facilities and vendors for waste disposal. The majority (80-85%) of all sSolid waste is disposed of at the Pinellas County Solid Waste to Energy Plant where most is incinerated and any remaining material is landfilled. According to the Pinellas County Technical Management Committee, the most recent projections take the life of the county landfill to year 2065. POTABLE WATER: Current capacity: 25 23.5 MGD Current demand: 42-2 11.4 MGD Fiscal Year Projected Demand Maximum Projected Capacity Minimum Surplus Deficit 2015/16 11.4 20.75 9.36 2016/17 11.4 20.75 9.36 2017/18 11.5 20.75 9.35 2018/19 11.5 20.75 9.35 2019/20 11.6 20.75 9.34 Totals 2019/20 11.6 20.75 9.34 MGD = million gallons per day; Projections as per the City's Water Master Plan. Potable water LOS standard: 120 gallons per capita per day Current capacity: Total potable water available per day in gallons: 25,090,000 23,500,000 (2" 23.5 MGD) Gallons available peF Gapita peF day: 225.56 Current demand: Total potable water consumption per day in gallons: 12,000,00 11.400,000 (42-.9 11.4 MGD) GaIIORG ,.ORGun ed per sepita per day: 108.27 STORMWATER: 17 Ordinance No. 8805-16 Lk_ • • . • • • • .EF9 •.Z MISS • • Stormwater LOS Standard: No adverse impacts to existing floodplain elevations and no increase in stormwater flow rate leaving a site. Notes - 1. The City of Clearwater Drainage Desi qn Criteria was updated in September 2015 which specifies the design storms for new development in the City. Design Storm 10 -year storm frequency for all new developments for street drainage, storm systems, and culverts 25 -year storm frequency for all new developments for channels and detention areas with outfalls 50 -year storm freguency for all new developments for detention areas without outfalls 100 -year storm frequency for all new developments for detention areas without outfalls which overflow onto private property when capacity is exceeded Design standards for stormwater quality treatment/storage quantity shall conform to the current SWFWMD requirement [Presently being the SCS Unit Hydrograph design method, using the design storm frequency and a twenty-four (24) hour duration for sites ten (10) acres or more, and the rational design method for sites under ten (10) acres . 2. Development plans are reviewed for stormwater on a permit -by -permit basis. The City only approves a development if it meets the LOS standards per the City's design criteria. 18 Ordinance No. 8805-16 3. Major watersheds within the City Limits with Watershed Master Plans are Alligator Creek, Allen's Creek, and Stevenson Creek. The City also includes Coastal Zones 1-4 , the Beach Zone and to a lesser extent,,_ Curlew Creek, Possum Creek, Bishop Creek, and Mullet Creek. 4. In establishing Capital Improvement Projects for City projects, projects are determined through the number of structures removed from the 100 -year floodplain and improvements in roadway level of service with consideration for regional needs and cost benefit. SANITARY SEWER: Current capacity: 257 gallons per capita per day Current demand: 427- 113 gallons per capita per day Fiscal Year Projected Projected Surplus Demand Capacity (Deficit) Maximum Minimum 2080 2015/16 444 12.5 MGD 28.5 MGD 44:4 16.0 1,000 MGD 201 gill 2016/17 44.2 12.5 MGD 28.5 MGD 44-3 16.0 MGD 2011/12 2017/18 44,2 12.5 MGD 28.5 MGD 444 16.0 MGD 3 2018/19 44-3 12.5 MGD 28.5 MGD 44.2 16.0 MGD 2013/14 2019/20 44.3 12.6 MGD 28.5 MGD 44-2 15.9 MGD Totals (2844 14.3 MGD 28.5 MGD 44-2 15.9 2019/20) 1 1 MGD MGD = million gallons per day; Projections as per the City's Water Pollution Control (WPC) Master Plan. Sanitary sewer LOS standard: Current capacity (in gallons): Gallons available per capita per day Current demand: Gallons available per capita per day Jc1:7►/Ad"I 127 gallons per capita per day 28,500,000 267.14 257.50 14,100,000 12,500,000 427.22 112.94 Current parkland acres: 1,711 Current parkland acres per 1,000 persons: 15.46 Minimum parkland acres to meet adopted LOS: 442.72 Fiscal Year PFGjested Projected Surplus Demand Adopted Capacity (De€iei#) Level of Service (Kni 2009/40 2015/16 4 per 1,000 13.31 15.46 per 9.34 11.46 per 1,000 1,000 204OA 4 2016/17 4 per 1,000 43-34 15.46 per 9734. 11.46 per 19 Ordinance No. 8805-16 Parkland LOS standard: 4 acres per 1,000 people Note: Parkland is calculated using parklands that are within City boundaries that are owned and/or operated by the City. meat demand: 440 430.74 asses @ 4 pep 1-000 peFsens T.,+aI /.Gree/reF-thousand r esene \• .1,4754-7 1 aGreen 13.31 1 �Dper. 1,000 peFsens ROADS: ies44de-The most current edition of the Pinellas County MPO Level of Service Report identifies roadways operating with deficient levels of service. Deficient facilities are those roads operating at a peak hour level of service of E or F, and/or a volume -to -capacity (v/c) ratio of 0.9 or greater with no mitioatina improvements scheduled within three vears. 20 Ordinance No. 8805-16 1,000 1,000 '^�12 2017/18 4 per 1,000 iMi 15.46 per 9-34 11.46 per 1,000 1,000 20� 2018/19 4 per 1,000 . 43.31 15.46 per 9-.34 11.46 per 1,000 1,000 2013114 2019/20 4 per 1,000 43.31 15.46 per 934 11.46 per 1,000 1,000 Totals 4 per 1,000 41 15.46 per 9,34 11.46 per 1,000 1,000 Parkland LOS standard: 4 acres per 1,000 people Note: Parkland is calculated using parklands that are within City boundaries that are owned and/or operated by the City. meat demand: 440 430.74 asses @ 4 pep 1-000 peFsens T.,+aI /.Gree/reF-thousand r esene \• .1,4754-7 1 aGreen 13.31 1 �Dper. 1,000 peFsens ROADS: ies44de-The most current edition of the Pinellas County MPO Level of Service Report identifies roadways operating with deficient levels of service. Deficient facilities are those roads operating at a peak hour level of service of E or F, and/or a volume -to -capacity (v/c) ratio of 0.9 or greater with no mitioatina improvements scheduled within three vears. 20 Ordinance No. 8805-16 .. ass�:rzrr:�rs.T.sz =OEM m Or rz EL-FRIMINFIRMUMMe R.0 .. ass�:rzrr:�rs.T.sz 21 Ordinance No. 8805-16 EL-FRIMINFIRMUMMe R.0 21 Ordinance No. 8805-16 22 Ordinance No. 8805-16 OEM N''- m rl ILM 22 Ordinance No. 8805-16 Section 29. That the Capital Improvement Program Revenue Summary of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element, page 1-15 through 1-17, be repealed and replaced to read as follows: 1,630,040 1,932,340 1,932,030 1,840,110 1,867,760 1,887,120 10,989,4 635,3io 635,34 639,740 665,3io 686,270 705,830 3,966,770 2,092,439 1,983,280 1,839,790 1,839,790 1,839,790 1,839,790 11,434,97-0 11,850,000 15,544,329 8,648,000 13,724,590 8,770,000 11,390,290 69,927,190 290,000 290,000 290,009 290,000 290,000 290,000 1,740,090 1,399,190 1,396,030 1,396,030 1,409,990 1,424,090 1,438,339 8,453,6 26,000 25,QGG 26,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 460,000 18,111,970 21,806,280 16,070,590 19,894,790 15,001,910 17,676,350 107,561,890 80,000 140,000 160,000 140,000 140,000 140,000 800,000 110,000 i0,000 10,900 !IQ'()-- - --- - --- 60,000 3110,000 235,090 210,000 235,000 235,000 235,000 1,460,000 6,920,070 875,000 1,967,590 2,576,000 375,009 375,000 12,188,6 2,666,600 4,719,170 4,100,000 4,696,870 5,468,080 4,997,630 26,648,350 250,000 97,570 22,640 20,210 29,010 27,780 437,110 600,000 1,072,350 28,900 10,820 15,()70 14,420 1,641,560 2,677,600 2,740,460 2,709,139 2,736,590 2,724,640 2,707,280 16,295,7 4,331,450 3,884,790 3,837,700 3,912,320 3,726,690 3,844,070 23,536,9 2,700,000 2,710,000 2,7-65,000 2,750,990 2,750,000 2,750,000 46,415,0 415,000 415,000 460,000 545,000 646,000 530,090 2,911,000 19,976,720 16,904,260 16,371,850 17,747,810 16,134,490 16,746,180 102,880,300 40,000 110,760 114,080 117,509 121,030 124,660 628,030 350,000 i 5Q'QQQ 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 1,200,000 0 4,000 0 15,000 24 Ordinance No.8805- • CAbITAI IRAPRMIrmMCAIT PROGRAM CV 2010 -2011 THROUGH CV 90.16_9046 GITV A1C G DC\/CAl1IC CIIMRAADV CADITAI IRADDQVCMCAIT CARWATCD CI IAlll 2Aa Ail 2011112- ReveRwe 1 ..„d -q 399-000 360,769 2012113 201314 289,080 9 °�8 2014/15 311,030 6 299,660 Te al • UNIMA ■ 25 Ordinance No. 8805-16 CAPITAL EMPROVEMENT PROGRAM REVENUE SUMMARY FY 2015-16 THROUGH FY 2020/21 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND CITY OF CLEARWATER 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 Total GENERAL SOURCES General Revenue Road Millage Penny for Pinellas Transportation Impact Fees Local Option Gas Tax Special Program Fund Grants - Other Agencies Donations To Be Determined Subtotal General Sources Marine Revenue Clearwater Harbor Marina Fund Aviation Revenue Parking Revenue Water Revenue Sewer Revenue Water Impact Fees Sewer Impact Fees Utility R&R Stormwater Utility Revenue Gas Revenue Solid Waste Revenue Recycling Revenue Subtotal Self -Supporting Funds INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS Garage Fund Revenue Administrative Service Revenue Subtotal Internal Services Fund BORROWING 2,836,150 3,003,140 3,256,980 3,129,530 6,981,480 3,043,560 22,250,840 2,060,100 2,060,100 2,060,100 2,060,100 2,060,100 2,060,100 12,360,600 6,021,820 14,980,060 5,439,840 10,263,460 9,555,250 0 46,260,430 190,000 190,000 140,000 140,000 140,000 140.000 940,000 1,438,330 1,450,000 0 0 0 0 2,888,330 935,000 530,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 1,585,000 1,485,000 560,000 80,000 960,000 3,040,000 0 6,125,000 100,000 50,000 0 0 0 0 150,000 0 22.397.000 1.483.740 1,929.880 2.227,150 2,223,390 30,261,160 15,066,400 45,220,300 12,490,660 18,512,970 24,033,980 7,497,050 122,821,360 95,000 70,000 70.000 70,000 70,000 70,000 445,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 150.000 25,000 155,000 35,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 260,000 2,409,000 410,500 406,000 407,500 409,000 409,000 4,451,000 2,586,000 2,240,470 3,071,000 4,651,000 4,271,000 4,251,000 21,070,470 8,412,830 7,879,280 5,200,960 4,853,500 6,161,480 7,040,510 39,548,560 24,000 24,000 24,000 24,000 24,000 24,000 144.000 82,130 12,460 12,460 12,460 12,460 12,460 144,430 8,667,170 9,205,680 3,939,040 4,030,390 4,030,390 4,367,030 34,239,700 5,498,550 5,825,100 5,831,860 6,348,450 6,729,430 6.294,000 36,527,390 6,050,000 4,050,000 13.850,000 4.050,000 4,050,000 4,050,000 36,100,000 535,000 535,000 535,000 535,000 535,000 535.000 3,210,000 90.000 100.000 100.000 100.000 100.000 100.000 590,000 34,499,680 30,532,490 33,100,320 25,122,300 26,432,760 27,193,000 176,880,550 77,400 79,720 82,110 84,580 87,110 89,730 500;650 1710,000 1350,000 1150,000 1150,000 1706,860 1475,000 8,541,860 1,787,400 1,429,720 1,232,110 1,234,580 1,793,970 1,564,730 9,042,510 26 Ordinance No. 8803-16 GENERAL SOURCES Purchase - General Fund 246,000 608,000 2,550,820 643,220 976,950 1,832,800 6,857,790 Lease Subtotal Borrowing/General Sources 246,000 608,000 2,550,820 643,220 976,950 1,832,800 6,857,790 SELF-SUPPORTING FUNDS Purchase - Stormwater 320,000 0 0 0 0 0 320,000 Lease Lease Purchase - Gas 161,000 0 0 0 0 0 161,000 Lease Purchase - Water 60,000 0 0 0 0 0 60,000 Lease Purchase - Sewer 109,000 0 700,000 0 0 0 809,000 Future Bond Issue - Water & Sewer 11,867,870 11,378,110 20,987,540 4,433,650 5,365,670 0 5.4,032,840 Subtotal Borrowing/Self Supporting Funds 12,517,870 11,378,110 21,687,540 4,433,650 5,365,670 0 55,382,840 INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS Purchase - Garage 5,441,000 5,520,440 5,620,850 5,223,270 5,327,730 5,434,290 32,567,580 Lease Lease Purchase - Administrative Services 405,000 405,000 405,000 410,000 410,000 500,000 2,535,000 Subtotal Borrowing/internal Service Funds 5,846,000 5,925,440 6,025,850 5,633,270 5,737,730 5,934,290 35,102,580 TOTAL: ALL FUNDING SOURCES 69,963,350 95,094,060 77,087,300 55,579,990 64,341,060 44,021,870 406,087,630 Source: 2015 — 2016 Annual Operating Budget and Capital Improvement Budget 27 Ordinance No. 8805-16 Section 30. That the Capital Improvement Program Expenditure Summary by Function of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element, page 1-17, be repealed as replaced to read as follows: 28 Ordinance No. 8805-16 ..... ..... . ... . ... ...... ..... --- --- ... - - ..... -- --- ... - --- ... - --- ... - --- ...... - --- - --- --- -- --- -- --- -- --- -- --- -- --- _ - --- - --- - --- - --- - --- - -- - --- --- --- . .... - --- .■• - --- . ..■ - --- r r•r - --- • ■M - --- . ■•• - --- _. -- ... --- - --- - - -- - - --- - - - - --- --- -- - - -- rrr •■• r■r err _.r rrr r rrr r rrr _, rrr _, rrr r rrr r rrr _ • • - -- - r rrr -- --- rr rrr -- --- -- r rrr _ ■•■ --- - --- rrr --- rr rrr - --- --- . ■• - -- r -- •■ rrr r• rrr r rrr r rrr • ■•■ r ON _ .f• •fir rrr - --- rrr - --- ._r rrr -- --- - rrr - --- - ._rrr - --- r rrr --- --- • - rrr --- •■■ --- • 0 r - --- • •r• - --- rrr --- • rrr - --- • rrr - --- rrr - --- r •■• . as • .r rrr r r r .. _.• . .• _r ■ rrr as .r r •_ rrr rr rrr rr rrr rr rrr •._ rrr 28 Ordinance No. 8805-16 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BY FUNCTION FY 2015/16 THROUGH FY 2020/21 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND CITY OF CLEARWATER Schedule of Planned Expenditures Function 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 Total Police Protection 200,000 3,305,000 0 0 0 0 3,505,000 Fire Protection 1,476,390 4,857,920 3,275,470 4,778,060 1,391,340 2,19.5,710 17,974,890 Major Street Maintenance 3,656,430 5,668,100 5,654,850 5,654,850 3,658,850 3,484,850 27,777,930 Sidewalk and Bike Trails 472,000 472,000 472,000 472,000 473,250 473,250 2,834,500 Intersections 335,000 335,000 331,990 315,410 315,400 315,390 1,948,190 Parkinq 2,389,000 19,482,500 381,000 382,500 384,000 384,000 23,403,000 Miscellaneous Engineerinq 935,000 535,000 35,000 35,000 2,460,000 35,000 4,035,000 Parks Development 6,735,000 5,037,000 3,564,840 3,325,000 7,125,000 1,440,000 27,226,840 Marine Facilities 410,000 385,000 390,000 390,000 390,000 390,000 2,355,000 Airpark Facilities 65,000 715,000 115,000 1,215,000 3,815,000 15,000 5,940,000 Libraries 115,580 387,350 27,340 462,720 35,000 0 1,027,990 Garage 5,639,400 5,700,160 5,702,960 5,307,850 .5,414,840 5,524,020 33,289,230 Maintenance of Buildings 902,000 881,850 794,070 2,161,630 1,084,590 1,045,650 6,869,790 General Public City Building 110,000 522,800 4,646,630 985,650 10,289,100 0 16,554,180 Miscellaneous 2,125,000 .5,995,000 1,625,000 1,630,000 1,955,000 2,045,000 15,375,000 Stormwater Utility 5,802,550 5,714,380 4,751,150 6,174,320 4,999,690 6,294,000 33,736,090 Gas System 6,211,000 4,050,000 13,850,000 4,050,000 4,050,000 4,050,000 36,261,000 Solid Waste & Recycling 625,000 635,000 635,000 635,000 635,000 635,000 3,800,000 Utilities Miscellaneous 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 120,000 Sewer System 24,469,000 23,260,000 16,260,000 11,400,000 10,200,000 10,150,000 95,739,000 Water System 7270 000 7135,000 14,555,000 6185000 5,645,000 5,=525 ,O00 46,315,000 69,963,350 95,094,060 77,087,300 55,579,990 64 341,060 44,021,870 406,087,630 Source: City of Clearwater Ordinance 8768-15, Exhibit B 29 Ordinance No. 8805-16 Section 31. Should any part or provision of this Ordinance be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the Ordinance as a whole, or any part thereof other than the part declared to be invalid. Section 32. This ordinance shall become effective when the Department of Economic Opportunity issues a final order determining the adopted amendment to be in compliance, or the Administration Commission issues a final order determining the adopted amendments to be in compliance, in accordance with Section 163.3184, F.S., as amended. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Approved as to form: George N. Cretekos Mayor Attest: Camilo Soto Rosemarie Call Assistant City Attorney City Clerk 30 Ordinance No. 8805-16 �= 16303► C ' Co�cJl'rex,L 01 on Av-enc45 ORDINANCE 14 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNTY OF PINELLAS ESTABLISHING A MOBILITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND REPEALING TRANSPORTATION CONCURRENCY BY AMENDING THE GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES OF THE TRANSPORTATION, FUTURE LAND USE AND QUALITY COMMUNITIES, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENTS AND CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT SECTION OF THE PINELLAS COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; PROVIDING FOR OTHER MODIFICATIONS THAT MAY ARISE FROM REVIEW OF THIS ORDINANCE AT THE PUBLIC HEARING AND/OR WITH OTHER RESPONSIBLE PARTIES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR LOCATION OF RECORDS; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Section 163, Part II, Florida Statutes, establishes the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Act; and WHEREAS, Pinellas County adopted its Comprehensive Plan on August 8, 1989, and significantly amended the Plan on March 18, 2008, based on the adopted Evaluation and Appraisal Report and following review by the State; and WHEREAS, Florida House Bill 7207, also known as the Community Planning Act, was signed into law in 2011; and WHEREAS, the Community Planning Act removed State requirements for local government implementation of transportation concurrency management systems; and WHEREAS, in the absence of state imposed transportation concurrency management requirements, the Pinellas County Metropolitan Planning Organization authorized a multi - jurisdictional task force to develop a countywide approach to manage the transportation impacts of development projects through local site plan review processes; and WHEREAS, the Mobility Plan Task Force participated in the development of a countywide mobility plan through a coordinated effort involving the local governments of Pinellas County, and the Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority, Pinellas Planning Council and Florida Department of Transportation which was approved by the Metropolitan Planning Organization on September 11, 2013; and WHEREAS, the Pinellas County Mobility Plan provides a more flexible and efficient alternative to the traditional form of concurrency management, which ties development approvals to maintaining adopted roadway level of service standards, while facilitating multi- modal transportation solutions; and WHEREAS, implementation of the Pinellas County Mobility Plan recommendations require amendments to local comprehensive plans to establish supporting policies, associated land development provisions and repeal existing transportation concurrency management systems; and WHEREAS, amendments to the Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan are needed to establish a mobility management system designed to implement the Pinellas County Mobility Plan; and WHEREAS, road and mass transit level of service standards are not recognized in the policies, codes and processes related to the implementation of the "Pinellas County Mobility Plan; and WHEREAS, the name of the St. Petersburg -Clearwater International Airport was changed to St. Pete -Clearwater International Airport; and WHEREAS, amendments to the goals, objectives and policies of the Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan are needed to reflect current practices and conditions and include references to the right-of-way utilization review process as it relates to the implementation of the Land Development Code; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to remove policies in the Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan focusing on strategies that are already addressed in existing policies; and WHEREAS, descriptions of mixed use projects and areas require revisions to address multi -modal transportation; and WHEREAS, implementation of the Pinellas County Mobility Plan requires amendments to the Capital Improvements Element regarding changes to the names of corresponding land development code sections and related processes and removal of reference to road and mass transit level of service standards that are not recognized in the policies, codes and processes related to the implementation of the Pinellas County Mobility Plan; and WHEREAS, revision of policy regarding transportation related infrastructure construction in coastal high hazard areas is necessary for clarification purposes; and WHEREAS, implementation of the Pinellas County Mobility Plan requires amendments to the Intergovernmental Coordination Element regarding the coordination of local governments, the Metropolitan Planning Organization, Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority, Florida Department of Transportation and Pinellas Planning Council and recognition of changes to the names of corresponding land development code sections and related processes; and WHEREAS, implementation of the Pinellas County Mobility Plan requires amendments to the Concurrency Management Section to repeal transportation concurrency management in unincorporated Pinellas County. NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of County Commissioners of Pinellas County, Florida, in its regular meeting duly assembled on this _ day of , 2014, that: 2 SECTION I: PURPOSE AND INTENT The main purpose of this Ordinance is to establish the policy framework for the establishment of a mobility management system designed to implement the Pinellas County Mobility Plan, a countywide multi -modal approach to managing the transportation impacts of development projects in accordance with the Community Planning Act amendments to Section 163, F.S. The mobility management system replaces the existing transportation concurrency management system. The Ordinance amends four elements and the Concurrency Management Section of the Comprehensive Plan as described below. • Transportation Element - Establish the purpose and framework of the mobility management system, remove road and mass transit level of service standards, repeal transportation concurrency, reflect current practices and procedures, address truck route planning regarding County roads, remove policies focusing on strategies already addressed in existing policies, and recognize a change in the name of the St. Pete -Clearwater International Airport. • Future Land Use and Quality Communities - Revise policies to address multi -modal transportation in mixed-use areas, and remove/revise language pertaining to transportation concurrency. • Capital Improvements - Remove reference to road and mass transit level of service standards and recognize proposed name change of Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance to Multi- modal Impact Fee Ordinance. • Intergovernmental Coordination - Addresses the coordination of local governments and partner agencies related to the implementation of the Pinellas County Mobility Plan, Metropolitan Planning Organization corridor plans, and transportation system monitoring. • Concurrency Management Section - Repeal transportation concurrency management and reflect current practices and procedures relative to existing concurrency management system associated with other public services and facilities. SECTION II: THE GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES SECTION OF THE TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: 1. GOAL: PROVIDE FOR A SAFE, CONVENIENT, AND ENERGY EFFICIENT MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM THAT SERVES TO INCREASE MOBILITY, REDUCE THE INCIDENCE OF SINGLE -OCCUPANT VEHICLES, EFFICIENTLY UTILIZE PROTECT ROADWAY CAPACITY, REDUCE THE CONTRIBUTION TO AIR POLLUTION FROM MOTORIZED VEHICLES AND IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF LIFE FOR THE CITIZENS OF PINELLAS COUNTY. Traffic Circulation and Level o f c,,,.:,en Mobility 1.1 Objective: Develop and maintain a multi -modal transportation system that increases mobility for bicyclists, pedestrians and transit users as well as motorists and users of aviation and rail facilities, and that promotes development patterns that reduce vehicle miles traveled and greenhouse gas emissions. 1.1.1 Policy: Pinellas County shall implement a Pinellas County Mobility Management System through the application of Transportation Element policies and site plan and right-of-way utilization review processes. Policies pertainingto o the application of the Mobility Management System are listed below. L1.1 a. All development projects generating new trips shall be subject to payment of a multi -modal impact fee. •'�.Z.b. Development projects that generate between 51 and 300 new peak hour trips on deficient roads shall be classified as tier 1 and required to submit a transportation management plan (TMP) designed to address their impacts while increasing_ mobility and reducing the demand for single occupant vehicle travel. c. Development projects that generate more than 300 new peak hour trips on deficient roads shall be classified as tier 2, required to conduct a traffic study, and submit an accompanying report and TMP based on the report findings. .44 d. Multi -modal impact fee assessments may be applied as credit toward the cost of a TMP. .9 .7 e. A traffic study and/or TMP for a development project not impacting a deficient road corridor shall be required if necessary to address the impact of additional trips generated by the project on the surrounding traffic circulation system. f. Deficient roads shall include those operating at peak hour level of service P (LOS) E and F and/or volume -to -capacity We) ratio 0.9 or greater without a mitigating improvement scheduled for construction within three years. g. Multi -modal impact fee revenue shall be utilized to fund multi -modal improvements to local, count' or state facilities that are consistent with the comprehensive plan as well as the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Long Range Transportation Plan. h. Pinellas County shall work cooperatively with the MPO and other local governments to complete the biennial update of the Multi -modal Impact Fee Ordinance through the MPO planning_ process, which includes review by the MPO Technical Coordinating Committee and MPO Policy Board. 1. 142. Policy: Road improvements undertaken by Pinellas County er- the Florida Depaftmen shall be designed to e"evie*e the ..ubstandar-d '—e' of sefyiee eenditions increase their efficiency while providing safer travel conditions for all users to the extent feasible. 1.1.63. Policy: ies, -&5—"proved --by the NVO, thr-etigh the—appliemien ef-t Gene,.«..eney Aa..nagew.ent System and the Capital 7mpfeyemefits Element, -11LTL��111�11 L, UJ «nl:eable. The shall be 7e�}dcc`'r-as necessary -� tene�d ieal �`PP" Pinellas Coun , shall coordinate with the MPO in the development and implementation of corridor plans and strategies intended to address operational and safety issues on the major road network. • 1. 142. Policy: Road improvements undertaken by Pinellas County er- the Florida Depaftmen shall be designed to e"evie*e the ..ubstandar-d '—e' of sefyiee eenditions increase their efficiency while providing safer travel conditions for all users to the extent feasible. 1.1.63. Policy: ies, -&5—"proved --by the NVO, thr-etigh the—appliemien ef-t Gene,.«..eney Aa..nagew.ent System and the Capital 7mpfeyemefits Element, -11LTL��111�11 L, UJ «nl:eable. The shall be 7e�}dcc`'r-as necessary -� tene�d ieal �`PP" Pinellas Coun , shall coordinate with the MPO in the development and implementation of corridor plans and strategies intended to address operational and safety issues on the major road network. ,_ • ••KIM • M�PJMWALOJPI 1 1 i _ \W I T.I 1 1 I • - ON . 1 pw IMARMTEMINORM _ \W I T.I 1 1 I • - . 1 pw 1.1.34. Policy: Pinellas County shall coordinate road improvement plans with the needs of local residents in terms of historic and community preservation. NOW..- -WrAlkTA - - OWN 1.1.34. Policy: Pinellas County shall coordinate road improvement plans with the needs of local residents in terms of historic and community preservation. • • ' .'� 1.1.5 Policy: Pinellas County shall continue to work with the Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority (PSTA) to increase the efficiency of the &Eed f transit system -by System, Site Plan Review Pr-eeess and the ifnplefnefiteAien ef NVO eer-f idef stfa*gy plans. Note: Most of the policies 1.1.6 - 1.1.23 listed below are underlined to indicate they were moved from the Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel and Public Transportation and Demand Management sections. New policies and revisions to existing policies in this group are shown in double underline. Issues/subjects addressed in policies proposed for deletion in the Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel Section and not included in 1.1.6 -1.1.23 are covered in other sections. 1.1.6. Policv: Pinellas Countv shall, when appropriate and feasible. incorporate bicvcle- �,� friendly design standards into all new and reconstructed collector and arterial roads by providing an area where bicyclists may travel adjacent to the outside vehicle lane. On existing collector and arterial roads, bicycle -friendly standards may be implemented at the next resurfacing by adjusting the width of the vehicle lane to a minimum of 11 feet to reserve an area along the outer edge of pavement. 1.1.7. Policy: Where sufficient pavement width exists, Pinellas County shall provide a designated bicycle lane with a minimum width of four feet on roads adjacent to curb and gutter and a minimum width of five feet on roads having no curb and gutter. Vehicle lanes shall meet or exceed the minimum width standards. 0 ORION 0111 • , ff • . • . • , • ' .'� 1.1.5 Policy: Pinellas County shall continue to work with the Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority (PSTA) to increase the efficiency of the &Eed f transit system -by System, Site Plan Review Pr-eeess and the ifnplefnefiteAien ef NVO eer-f idef stfa*gy plans. Note: Most of the policies 1.1.6 - 1.1.23 listed below are underlined to indicate they were moved from the Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel and Public Transportation and Demand Management sections. New policies and revisions to existing policies in this group are shown in double underline. Issues/subjects addressed in policies proposed for deletion in the Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel Section and not included in 1.1.6 -1.1.23 are covered in other sections. 1.1.6. Policv: Pinellas Countv shall, when appropriate and feasible. incorporate bicvcle- �,� friendly design standards into all new and reconstructed collector and arterial roads by providing an area where bicyclists may travel adjacent to the outside vehicle lane. On existing collector and arterial roads, bicycle -friendly standards may be implemented at the next resurfacing by adjusting the width of the vehicle lane to a minimum of 11 feet to reserve an area along the outer edge of pavement. 1.1.7. Policy: Where sufficient pavement width exists, Pinellas County shall provide a designated bicycle lane with a minimum width of four feet on roads adjacent to curb and gutter and a minimum width of five feet on roads having no curb and gutter. Vehicle lanes shall meet or exceed the minimum width standards. 0 1.1.8. Policy: When roads are improved to the standards identified in Policy 1.1.6., the ,1.3 bicycle lane shall be designated by markingand nd si ng age. 1.1.9. Policy: When it is not feasible for the area intended for bicycle travel to meet the , %.� minimum width standards, a bicycle lane shall not be designated. However, the width of vehicle lanes may be set at the minimum standard with the outside lane made as wide as possible. 1.1.10. Policy: Pinellas County shall include sidewalks alongside roadways scheduled for Ax -7 ' resurfacing in its Capital Improvement Program where feasible. 1.1.11. Policy: The planned Pinellas Trail Loop is critically important in the Count tewafd to allow bicycling and walking to become a more viable alternative- for commuter travel throughout Pinellas County. Therefore, Pinellas County shall prioritize efforts to develop the Pinellas Trail Loop, with east west eefifieeti - 1.1.12. Policy: Pinellas County shall ft sidewa& Construction of frontage sidewalks 43shall all be required in the all road rights-of-way under the jurisdiction of Pinellas County through - the application of the site plan --d right-of-way utilization review processes. Through a right-of-way utilization waiver process. Pinellas County may require the sidewalk to be constructed at alternative off-site locations when - the right-of-way conditions preclude the construction of the sidewa lk ad'ai cent tt theme proproposed development 1.1.13. Policy: Pinellas County; thfeugh amendment of its Land Develepment Cade, shall .6.(o require that new development and ep projects to make adequate provisions for storage/parking areas for bicycles as appropriate. 1.1.14. Policy: Pinellas County shall continue to implement sidewalk construction projects where necessary to close existing_gaps along arterial, collector and local roads through the CIP, and Getiet f-eney Management System site plan and right-of- way utilization review processes. 1.1.15. Policv: in assee-iatien with the tiodate to the County ,$..10 Pinellas County shall incorporate livable community requirements such as separatedibuffered walkways (e.g., sidewalks, crosswalks) 'connecting pedestrian facilities existing within adjacent road rights-of-way to buildings proposed for construction. As an alternative to extending_ pedestrian facilities through parking areas, the Code shall allow for proposed buildings to be oriented toward pedestrian facilities in adjacent road rights-of-way_ 1.1.16. Policy: Pinellas County shall work with the MPO's Bicycle Pedestrian Transportation 0S.1) Advisory Committee, FDOT's Community Traffic Safety Team, the MPO's 10 School Transportation Safety Committee, the Barrier Island Government Council (BIG -C) and other agencies and organizations as appropriate to identify locations where crosswalk improvements are needed to allow bicyclists and pedestrians to safely cross major roads to reach their destinations. 1.1.17. Policv: Pinellas Countv shall facilitate the provision of bus stop improvements and pullout bays along major roadways through the application of the site plan and right-of- �� way utilization review processes. off\ 1.1.18. Policy: Pinellas County shall continue to coordinate with TBARTA as necessary to J t A b provide ride sharing opportunities for (� Pinellas County employees. 1.1.19. Policy: Pinellas County shall continue to work with the MPO in identifying and monitoring "unmet" transportation disadvantaged needs within unincorporated Pinellas County. Residents in need of transportation assistance shall be informed of services available through the Pinellas County Transportation DisadvantagedProgram. transportation disadvantaged persons that would be affected by an evacuation order in the event of a natural disaster. Those needing to evacuate to a pub.1e- shelter who have no personal means available to transport them,_shall be provided the opportunity t�grister with Pinellas Count, f� or Special Needs assistance. where the need for pedestrian accommodations between bus stops and the sidewalk network is most pronounced from a safety standpoint and on the implementation of necessary improvements. 1.1.22. Policy: Pinellas County shall continue to work with the MPO and PSTA in support of transit initiatives designed to increase ridership. 1.1.23. Policy: Pinellas County shall continue to install landscaping along sidewalks using tree , 04.1'j„ canopy, where feasible, to provide shaded areas for pedestrians. 11 Land Use Coordination and Highway Beautifleation 1.32. Objective: The Transportation Element shall be coordinated with the goals, objectives and policies of the Future Land Use and Quality Communities Element in guiding population distribution, economic growth, and the overall pattern of urban development. J i.32.1. Policy: Pinellas County shall coordinate decisions on Future Land Use Map (FLUM) amendments with the mobility and safety needs of the principal modes of travel including bicycling, walking, transit and motor vehicles. 1.32_23. Policy: Pinellas County shall rely an use the Future Land Use Map as a baste tool for projecting population densities and housing and employment patterns for the process of forecasting traffic demand through the Tampa Bay Regional Transportation Planning Model (TBRPM). 1.2.34. Policy: In asseeiatien with he ttpda4e to the Land De elep ent Coco Pinellas County shall r-eeemmend _ develop:._ parking. standards : mixed-use development in coordination with the viflell s County raretr-e ,Bran Planning OfganimAien MPO. 1.32_4§. Policy: Pinellas County shall identify commercial and residential corridors in the unincorporated area in need of revitalization. Potential corridors include 54th Avenue North in Lealman, Seminole Boulevard, and 66th Street and 34th Street between Pinellas Park and St. Petersburg as part of the update to the Land Development Code. 1.32_56. Policy: After carrying out policy 1.32_43, Pinellas County shall study one of the corridors to develop a prototype approach for improving u,— Pr i?+t al i,,inv them. The study shall consider appropriate changes to the land development regulations, land use and zoning changes, access requirements, infrastructure improvements and other mechanisms that would improve conditions within these corridors. L32_6-7. Policy: Pinellas County shall identify opportunities to coordinate land use and transportation planning along the "coastal corridor" from Gulf Boulevard to the Pinellas/Pasco County Line. This coordination would be intended to create or highlight destinations and venues so that tourists can easily go from one community to another while experiencing the uniqueness of each. The 12 "coastal corridor" runs the length of the barrier island chain from St. Pete Beach to Clearwater Beach (Gulf Boulevard) and continues northward on Ft. Harrison Avenue/Edgewater Drive/Alternate U.S. Highway 19 to Pasco County. Right -of -Way Protection., a*d Functional Classification 1.-53. Objective: Provide for right-of-way and corridor protection for existing and future transportation facilities in accordance with the future right-of-way maps contained in the Transportation Element as Figures 3-1, 3 -la, 3 -lb, 3-1c and 3-ld. L-53.1. Policy: Preserve needed right-of-way, as identified in the future right-of-way maps referenced in Objective 1.-53, through the site plan and right-of-way utilization review processes. 1.-53.2. Policy: Pinellas County shall amend the future right-of-way maps, as deemed necessary, in order to reflect changes in right-of-way needs. L-53.3. Policy: Pinellas County shall not vacate public right-of-way until it is determined that the right-of-way is not required for present or future public use, including stormwater treatment facilities, reads transportation facilities and attendant use. 1.§3.4. Policy: Pinellas County shall coordinate with the municipalities regarding the maintenance responsibilities for County roads within their respective jurisdictions. 13 M. ...... .. Oil -0 TRINT ._ .. NO _ In. ■. ,•• RMI Em RI In. ■. ,•• In. go IpqOPTRIER1p go Safety, Efficiency and Goods Movement 1.54. Objective: Pinellas County's transportation system should provide for safety and efficiency in the movement of people and goods. L-54.1. Policy: Pinellas County shall continue to implement access management standards as identified in the Access Management Section of the Land Development Code, through the application of the Pinellas County Site Plan and Right -of -Way Utilization Review Processes and Genetir-feney Management System fef 1.54.2. Policy: Pinellas County shall continue monitoring signalized intersections to coordinate signal timing along major County and State facilities. 1.54.3. Policy: Pinellas County shall continue to implement an ongoing roadway maintenance program to provide for safe operating conditions for multi -modal travel and to preserve roadway capacity. 1.54.4. Policy: Pinellas County shall work with the MPO to promote bicycle and pedestrian safety education programs and the enforcement of rules and regulations, in cooperation with the MPO Bicycle Pedestrian Advisory Committee, pertaining to bieye-le bicycling, walking_and motor vehicle use. 1.84.5. Policy: Pinellas County shall continue to work with the MPO's advisory committees and local law enforcement officials to monitor high accident -frequency locations on State and County roadways to identify any design or operational improvements that may alleviate hazardous conditions and shall assign a priority implementation of accident reduction improvements through the CIP and TIP development processes. 1.54.6. Policy: Pinellas County, through its land development regulations, shall require that all fiew development to make adequate provisions for safe and efficient on- site traffic flow and provide adequate parking facilities. 17 L-84.7. Policy: Pinellas County shall cooperate with local law enforcement agencies, educational facilities, emergency service providers and transportation provider agencies for a multi -disciplinary approach to traffic safety. 1.54.8. Policy: Pinellas County shall expand the use of intelligent transportationsystems kITS) for transportation information gathering and incident management functions. 1.54.9. Policy: Pinellas County shall work with the MPO and all the cities of Pinellas County to establish continue developing and maintaining_a comprehensive traffic management system through the deployment of ITS. 1.54.10. Policy: Pinellas County shall coordinate with all the cities of Pinellas County to implement the ITS improvements, including the establishment of a primary control center, and the associated operations and maintenance needs, identified in the Pinellas County Long -Range ATMS/ITS Master Plan. 1.54.11. Policy: Pinellas County shall coordinate with the MPO, local governments, PSTA, FDOT and other affected agencies to implement non -roadway ITS improvements (e.g., transit fare systems, pedestrian street crossing enhancements, communications). 1.4.12. Policy_ Pinellas County shall continue to identify and maintain roadways suitable for truck travel. State, Regional and Local Coordination 1.95. Objective: Pinellas County shall coordinate its transportation planning with transportation planning at the local, regional and state level. 1.95.1. Policy: Pinellas County shall coordinate roadway and transit service improvements with the future needs of the St. Petershufg-Clearwater International Airport in the development of the CIP/CIE and the State's Five -Year Work Program through active involvement in the MPO planning process. This includes County staff participation in .the MPO's Technical Coordinating Committee (TCC) and Board of County Commissioner participation as members of the MPO Policy Board. 1.95.2. Policy: Pinellas County shall utilize the MPO's Congestion Management Process (CMP) to help identify small-scale transportation improvements needed on backlogged and constrained roadways. Implementation of such projects shall occur through the Genetiffeney Management System, as eaffied out thr-eugb construction of transportation management plan stfeAegies improvements spensered by developers, or through the CIP/CIE. 18 L95.3. Policy: Through the MPO's Technical Coordinating Committee, Pinellas County shall seek and incorporate input from local governments, FDOT District 7, the PSTA, and the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council (TBRPC) in the process of developing data and analysis necessary to administer and update Pinellas County's Transportation Element and Bey related land development codes . 1.95.4. Policy: Pinellas County shall seek amendments to the MPO Long Range Transportation Plan, during the MPO Plan Update process, as deemed necessary, to maintain consistency with the Transportation Element of the Pinellas County Comprehensive Plan. 1.95.65. Policy: Pinellas County shall coordinate efforts with FDOT to incorporate bicycle and pedestrian -friendly provisions in the design and construction of expansion and re -surfacing projects on State roads, where feasible. 1.95.76. Policy: Pinellas County shall review local government comprehensive plans and plan amendments and coordinate with the respective municipalities to the extent necessary to maintain consistency between the Transportation Element and local plans. 1.95.97. Policy: Pinellas County shall address air quality issues in transportation planning through the MPO's Technical Coordinating Committee and ensure that the Transportation Element and related land development codes Gefieuffeney Management System support the Florida State Implementation Plan (SIP), which sets forth actions necessary to maintain National Ambient Air Quality standards. 1.95.98. Policy: Pinellas County shall coordinate with local governments, transit providers and MPOs in the region as well as the Tampa Bay Afea Regi TfanspefteAien TBARTA) on the development and operation of multimodal transportation systems and a regional multimodal transportation master plan. 1.95.4-09. Policy: Pinellas County shall continue cooperative efforts between State and local transportation operating agencies for a unified approach to traffic management. 1.95.14-0. Policy: Pinellas County shall wer4 coordinate with the MPO to implement the Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan meted u......,.~ Ser-=iees Geffimute andNevFfeedeffi funds to address the mobility needs of the 19 transportation disadvantaged community in Pinellas County the --Tamp& 3&y 1.95.121. Policy: Pinellas County staff shall continue to work with PSTA in support of their planning activities and members of the Board of County Commissioners shall continue to participate in PSTA policy decisions as members of their policy board. 1.95.142. Policy: Pinellas County shall work with the MPO in support of efforts to coordinate the application of eenetiffeney management systems the Pinellas County Mobility Plan throughout the County. 1.95.1-53. Policy: Pinellas County shall pursue opportunities for funding for transportation projects through the following: • Partnerships with private interests as well as local, State and Federal agencies to leverage County transportation funding for projects to the fullest extent possible; • Seeking State and Federal grant monies and eder-al—eafmafks as appropriate; and • Supporting legislative activities to increase the return from Federal fuel taxes to the State. 1.95.164. Policy: Pinellas County shall coordinate with the Barrier Island Government Council (BIG -C) on the implementation of improvements to the Gulf Boulevard corridor. Ports and Aviation Note: None of the County's ports " aeility pei4s", as defined by Rule 9i 5, F. ^ .r , in Di~e"as County fall within the jurisdiction of the Board of County Commissioners, and therefore, are not examined in the Transportation Element. 2. GOAL: STIMULATE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN PINELLAS COUNTY THROUGH THE GROWTH AND EXPANSION OF THE ST. PETERSBURG- CLEARWATER INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT IN A MANNER THAT MINIMIZES IMPACTS ON THE SURROUNDING AREA AND THE ENVIRONMENT AND THAT IS COORDINATED WITH FEDERAL, STATE, REGIONAL AND LOCAL AGENCY, PLANS AND REGULATIONS. 20 2. 1. Objective: The Ports and Aviation Section of the Transportation Element shall be coordinated with the St. PeterClearwater International Airport Master Plan, Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) approved Airport Layout Plan, and any amendments or updates to these documents, which are hereby incorporated as part of the Pinellas County Comprehensive Plan pursuant to Section 163.3177(6)(k), F.S. 2.2. Objective: Expand the landside and airside capacity of the St. Pete -Clearwater International Airport to meet future demand consistent with the Airport Master Plan, Airport Layout Plan, and future demand and design studies. 2.2.1. Policy: Pinellas County shall implement taxiway and runway improvements identified in the Airport Master Plan and Airport Layout Plan in accordance with the CIP schedule as federal, state and local funds become available in order to meet the forecasted demand for airfield capacity. 2.2.2. Policy: Pinellas County shall expand access and terminal roads, automobile parking lots, aircraft parking capacity and air cargo facilities, office and warehouse and/or light industrial space based on the CIP and projected growth. 2.2.3. Policy: Pinellas County shall rezone existing land for additional aviation development based on recommendations contained in the Airport Master Plan and FAA - approved Airport Layout Plan in order to meet demand. 2.2.4. Policy: Pinellas County shall expand, rehabilitate and enhance the terminal and associated landside areas to accommodate existing and future passenger capacity. 2.2.5. Policy: Pinellas County shall coordinate with FDOT in obtaining the necessary funding for construction of access road improvements. 2.2.6. Policy: Pinellas County shall construct improvements that are specified and prioritized in the Airport Master Plan and Airport Layout Plan, and Joint Airport Capital Improvement Pro rg am. 2.2.7. Policy: Seek diversification and expansion of revenue sources through the utilization of land within and adjacent to the Airport in a manner that is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, Pinellas County Land Development Code and Airport Master Plan and Airport Layout Plan. 2.3. Objective: Ensure Airport operations are consistent with and protected by the Pinellas County Land Development Code and Future Land Use and Quality Communities Element regarding surrounding land uses and the environment. 2.3.1. Policy: New or expanded Airport facilities shall be directed away from environmentally -sensitive areas and consistent with the Natural, Historical 21 and Cultural Resources Element and the Surface Water Management Element and FAA regulations. 2.3.2. Policy: Pinellas County shall enforce the overlay zoning regulations in its Land Development Code that restrict heights of structures and objects of natural growth around the Airport. 2.3.3. Policy: The Future Land Use and Quality Communities Element shall restrict the land uses in the Airport overlay zoning area to industrial, aviation, preservation, public/semi-public and commercial uses as recommended in the Airport Master Plan and Airport Layout Plan. 2.4. Objective: Coordinate operations and planned expansions of the Airport with federal, state, regional and local agency plans. 2.4.1. Policy: The Airport Director shall submit all eligible capital improvement projects to the appropriate funding agencies for approval and funding assistance. 2.4.2. Policy: Pinellas County's Capital Improvements Element shall reflect the appropriate costs for the facilities recommended in the Airport Master Plan and Airport Layout Plan, and any amendments or additions to said document. SECTION III: OBJECTIVE 1.3. AND THE ASSOCIATED POLICIES OF THE FUTURE LAND USE AND QUALITY COMMUNITIES ELEMENT OF THE PINELLAS COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ARE AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: 1.3 Objective: Pinellas County, through its comprehensive planning program and land development regulations, shall support efforts to create, recreate, and maintain areas of mixed-use development at appropriate locations to achieve the following objectives: e provide vibrant and safe walkable areas; e concentrate growth in relatively discrete areas that are compatible with the community character, local traditions, and historic heritage; e place housing in proximity to employment opportunities, services and amenities; o establish urban areas that support transportation choices other than privately -owned vehicles and are more efficiently served by transit; o establish quality -designed urban environments that create vibrant, livable places; o provide locations that create a range of housing opportunities and choices, including the provision of affordable housing; - e provide urban areas that incorporate well-designed public spaces; o encourage development at an intensity and scale that is compatible with proximate residential neighborhoods; 22 • provide adequate buffering and a transition gradient between non- residential and/or higher density residential development and proximate residential neighborhoods and/or less intensive nonresidential development; • encourage development that is compatible with the natural environment and the overall vision of the community; • transition to a pattern of various types of land use that is more efficient in the use of energy and reduces the emission of greenhouse gases. 23 1.3.1. Policy: The following guidelines shall be used in determining appropriate locations for mixed-use development: Table 1 Type of Mixed - Use Develo ment FORM OF DEVELOPMENTZ O o on L 6> •C ^!7 � ami a� � ami ami z� E~A Neighborhoods Traditional - - - - Suburban - - - - Mobile Home & Manufactured - - - Large Multi -family Communities & Resorts - - R - Centers Urban A A A - Town A A A - Suburban Commercial A A Neighborhood A - A Village A - A - Corridors Interstate A A - - Commercial A A A - Employment A A - - Residential - - - - Scenic/Non-Commercia13 R R R - Coastal' A A A - Transit A A A A Districts Employment A A - Airport A A - University/College Campuses A A - - Arts and Cultural R A - - Medical R R - - Historic4 - A = This type of mixed-use development is generally appropriate within this specific form of development R = This type of mixed-use development should be regulated to ensure that it is compatible with this specific form of development ' = Limitations on residential densities within the coastal high hazard area and the coastal storm area may restrict residential development 2 = The general forms of development that comprise the urban land use morphology in Pinellas County are described in the Definition Section of the Future Land Use and Quality Communities Element 3 = Development policies specific to scenic/non-commercial corridors place additional requirements for locating mixed use development along these corridors 4 Appropriate types of mixed use development will depend upon the historic development pattern within the district. 24 In addition to using Table 1, appropriate locations for large-scale or neighborhood -scale mixed use development shall be determined based on a balancing of the guidelines listed below that are applicable to the area under consideration, and the appropriate location for transit oriented development shall be based on the requirements listed at the end of the following guidelines: LARGE-SCALE MIXED-USE PROJECT OR MIXED-USE AREA The location can serve as a walkable destination for nearby areas. 2. There is adequate infrastructure existing or planned that serves sefviffg the proposed location, including a transportation network that will meet the mobility needs of all principal modes of travel including bicycling, walking and transit as well as motor vehicles. 3. There are transportation choices other than privately -owned vehicles that service the proposed location. At least one of the following public transit services is available to serve the proposed mixed-use development: a. The location is served, or is scheduled to be served within 6 months, by enhanced bus service with no more than 15 minute headways during morning and evening rush hours. Service by more than one bus route is preferred, and the presence of a public or private circulator system that serves the location and has a service interconnection with the bus system may improve the location's suitability for mixed-use development. b. The location is served by a Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) route that is in operation or that has been selected for BRT service through the MPO process and there is a firm funding commitment to establish BRT and have it operational within 5 years. 4. The location has direct access or is in close proximity to a segment of the countywide or a local multi -use path or trail system. 5. The location can accommodate a mix of land uses, including a residential component, that are able to blend with surrounding uses without juxtaposing incompatible uses or building types. 6. The mixed-use development will create opportunities for providing a mix of housing types in a range of prices, a certain percentage of which will meet the County's affordable housing criteria. 7. The mixed-use development can accommodate one or more of the County's targeted industries or businesses. 8. The mixed-use development is of sufficient size to allow a decrease in density/intensity from the center of the mixed-use development to the periphery that is compatible with the surrounding land uses. 25 9. The mixed-use development will provide services (e.g. services such as convenience groceries, dry cleaners, and personal care) and amenities within walking distance of residential development within the mixed use project or area or of residents in the surrounding community, if applicable. 10. Compatibility of mixed-use development with other goals, objectives, and policies of the Pinellas County Comprehensive Plan. 11. The relationship of the mixed-use development to plans of other local governments and the Regional Planning Council, to the Countywide Plan, and to the strategies in Pinellas by Design. NEIGHBORHOOD -SCALE MIXED-USE PROJECT OR MIXED-USE AREA 1. The location can serve as a walkable destination for nearby areas. 2. There is adequate infrastructure existing or planned that serves sefv-i*g the proposed location, including a transportation network that will meet the mobility needs of all principal modes of travel including bicycling, walking and transit as well as motor vehicles. 3. The location can accommodate a mix of land uses, including a residential component, that are able to blend with surrounding uses without juxtaposing incompatible uses or building types. 4. The mixed-use development is of sufficient size to allow a decrease in density/intensity from the center of the mixed-use development to the periphery that is compatible with the surrounding land uses. 5. The mixed-use development will provide or have access to services (e.g. services such as convenience groceries, dry cleaners, and personal care) and amenities within walking distance of residential development within the mixed use project or area or of residents in the surrounding community, if applicable. 6. Compatibility of mixed-use development with other goals, objectives, and policies of the Pinellas County Comprehensive Plan. The relationship of the mixed-use development to plans of other local governments and the Regional Planning Council, to the Countywide Plan, and to the strategies in Pinellas by Design. TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT Transit oriented development shall be located within an easy walking distance (roughly '/2 mile) of transit stations that are part of a rail or fixed -guideway system as established in the 26 Pinellas County Metropolitan Planning Organization's Long -Range Transportation Plan. The specific station locations are determined through a multi -agency process for transit corridor planning that is based on the Federal Transit Administration planning process in Pinellas County. 1.3.2. Policy Mixed-use development shall be integrated into a walkable area, which exhibits most, if not all, of the following characteristics: a. A pedestrian -friendly environment that results in active, walkable streets. b. Building setbacks are reduced. c. Buildings are interconnected by a continuous network of safe, convenient, comfortable, and interesting sidewalks, paths, and bicycle routes. d. If residential neighborhoods and other walkable destinations are located nearby, mixed-use development is interconnected with the surrounding community by a network of safe, convenient, comfortable, and interesting sidewalks, paths, and bicycle routes. e. Pedestrian -scale streetlights and other amenities are installed. f. There is safe, convenient access to public transit. g. The development will provide well-designed public spaces (e.g. pocket parks and plazas) and space for civic uses such as libraries, community centers, law enforcement substations. h. Applicable livable community characteristics identified in the policies in support of Goal 2. 1.3.3. Policy: Pinellas County shall establish the Community Redevelopment District- Activity Center Future Land Use Map category to recognize those areas of the County that are appropriate locations for mixed use development that serve as community focal points of commerce, employment, and housing. 1.3.4. Policy: Use of the Community Redevelopment District -Activity Center Future Land Use Map (FLUM) category shall require a special area plan approved by the Board of County Commissioners. The special area plan shall, at a minimum, address the following: a. Permitted uses and locational criteria; 27 b. Density and intensity standards; c. Provisions for mixed use; d. Design guidelines, if any; e. Provisions for affordable housing and employment, if any; f. Provisions that achieve a walkable area; g. Impacts on public services and facilities; h. Integration with planned and existing mobility systems; i. Integration and compatibility with the surrounding community; j. Incentives that may be offered to encourage development that has an overall community benefit; and k. Consistency with the Pinellas County Comprehensive Plan. 1.3.5. Policy: Special area plans, as described in Policy 1.3.4., and the County's land development regulations as they apply to the Community Redevelopment District -Activity Center FLUM category may require that, in order to exceed an established base residential density or intensity of use, a project shall provide public benefits and amenities that support one or more of the objectives listed in Objective 1.3. Pinellas County would determine what public benefits and amenities would be acceptable for receiving additional development rights, and the extent of those additional development rights. 1.3.6 Policy: Special area plans, as described in Policy 1.3.4., and the County's land development regulations as they apply to the Community Redevelopment District -Activity Center FLUM category may require that development above an established base residential density or intensity of use rely upon the transfer of development rights from other properties to the subject property or properties. 1.3.7 Policy: Mixed-use development shall enhance, and not compromise, the integrity and viability of existing and planned residential neighborhoods. 1.3.8. Policy: Mixed-use development shall create a strong sense of community identity through consideration of such mechanisms as optional 28 and/or required urban design and architectural design criteria, recognizing historic setback patterns and lot sizes, the creation of places that are oriented to the pedestrian and alternative modes of travel such as bicycle use, providing greenspace and landscaping in public spaces, and other appropriate mechanisms that may be specific to a particular location. 1.3.9. Policy: When considering a Future Land Use Map amendment to designate a Community Redevelopment District -Activity Center, implementation of Policyies 4.2-rz.3. env 4.2.4. of the Future Land Use and Quality Communities Element shall take into consideration the area's historic development pattern, the interrelationship of the proposed designation with the surrounding community, whether the proposed Community Redevelopment District -Activity Center has historically served as a community focal point, the impact on traffic patterns resulting from mixed use development and an emphasis on pedestrian activity and non - motorized modes of travel, and the ability of the surrounding road network to distribute vehicle trips away from road corridors experiencing eenEaffeney con estion problems. 1.3.10. Policy: In association with the update to the Land Development Code, Pinellas County shall identify proposed amendments to the Land Development Code to include mixed-use development standards to achieve the intent expressed in Objective 1.3. The proposals shall also consider additional code amendments to implement recommendations in Pinellas by Design and the livable community objectives and policies under Goal 2 of this element. 1.3.11. Policy: In association with the update to the Land Development Code, Pinellas County in coordination with the Pinellas County Metropolitan Planning Organization shall recommend parking standards for mixed-use development. 1.3.12. Policy: Pinellas County will amend its land development regulations as determined appropriate based on the recommendations from Policy 1.3.11. 1.3.13. Policy: The Residential/Office Limited, Residential/Office General, Residential/Office/Retail, and Community Redevelopment District -Activity Center land use categories shall require a mixture of uses distributed as follows within each category: Residential (5 percent to 30 percent), and Non-residential (70 percent to 95 percent). 29 1.3.14. Policy: The Transit Oriented Development (TOD) land use categories, with the exception of the TOD — RC- E category, shall require a mixture of uses distributed as follows: Residential (20 percent to 75 percent), and Non-residential (25 percent to 80 .percent). SECTION IV: GOAL 4 AND THE ASSOCIATED OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES OF THE FUTURE LAND USE AND QUALITY COMMUNITIES ELEMENT OF THE PINELLAS COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ARE AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: GOAL FOUR: PINELLAS COUNTY SHALL WORK TOWARD A LAND USE PATTERN THAT CAN BE SUPPORTED BY THE AVAILABLE COMMUNITY AND PUBLIC FACILITIES THAT WOULD BE REQUIRED TO SERVE THAT DEVELOPMENT. 4.1. Objective: The Pinellas County Concurrency Management System will insure the compatibility of all proposed development with the capacities of the existing and planned support facilities for which a level of service standard has been adopted in this plan. 4.1.1. Policy: The Concurrency Management System will ensure proposed development to be considered for approval shall be in conformance with existing and planned support facilities for which a level of service standard has been adopted and that such facilities and services are available, at the adopted level of service standards, concurrent with the impacts of development. 4.1.2. Policy: On an annual basis, the Local Planning Agency of the Board shall develop and recommend adoption of a concurrency test statement that assesses the demands of existing and committed development upon support facilities. 4.2. Objective: The Concurrency Management System, applicable policies within the Pinellas County Comprehensive Plan, and the standards and the locational and use characteristics as set out in the Future Land Use Category Descriptions and Rules of the Future Land Use and Quality Communities Element comprise the County's program in which development shall be coordinated with the availability of public and private utilities. 4.2.1. Policy: Land use location and intensity shall be accurately defined and monitored through the Concurrency Management System, the Future Land Use and Quality Communities Element, including Policy 1.2.1., to ensure coordination with the availability of facilities and services. 30 4.2.2. Policy: Pinellas County's Land Development Regulations shall require developers to submit their proposed development plans to the affected public utilities, who will in turn submit to the County, prior to the County's issuance of development orders or building permits, a statement of their ability to serve the proposed development. 4.2.3. Policy: hand Use Map r T M)eats that „ia er-ease eek- in the . When makiniz decisions on requests to amend the Future Land Use Map (FLUMI or the Zonin2 Atlas ,other than decisions on appropriate locations for mixed-use development and transit oriented development), Pinellas County shall review the potential impact on the transportation system by considering the following: • Ability of the surrounding existing and planned transportation network to meet the mobility objectives of the Comprehensive Plan; • Capacity of the surrounding existing and planned transportation network to accommodate any projected additional demand; and • Extent to which the proposed FLUM amendment or rezoning furthers the intent of the Comprehensive Plan to improve mobility. 4.2.4. Policy: When making decisions on appropriate locations for mixed-use development and transit oriented development, Pinellas County shall use the guidelines in Policy 1.3.1 and Policy 1.3.9 of the Future Land Use and Quality Communities Element. 4.2.5. Policy: As a part of its water supply and water resource protection program, Pinellas County shall continue to implement its concurrency management system, to schedule capital improvements, and to make land use and development -related decisions that consider both existing and projected water demand as well as fiscal and environmental constraints. 4.3. Objective: Pinellas County Land Development Regulations shall require that the level of population density and development intensity in the coastal planning 31 area shall be compatible with the evacuation capabilities provided for in the hurricane evacuation program. 4.3.1. Policy: In order to limit the exposure of residents and property to coastal hazards and not increase existing and planned demands on hurricane evacuation corridors and public shelters, the population density and development intensity within the coastal planning area shall be consistent with Objective 1.3 of the Coastal Management Element and the supporting policies. 4.4. Objective: The Pinellas County Concurrency Management System shall insure that building permits and development orders for developments of regional impact are not authorized unless the needed support facilities and services are available or such authorization is conditioned on the availability of the facilities and services necessary to serve that development at the time it is needed. 4.4.1. Policy: Pinellas County's Concurrency Management System shall include, as a minimum, level of service standards for potable water, sanitary sewer, solid waste, drainage and recreation and open space. 4.5. Objective: Pinellas County's land development :regulations shall be applied to ensure the availability of suitable land for utility facilities necessary to support development. 4.5.1. Policy: The County shall maintain procedures in cooperation with utility companies by which the utilities are informed of development occurring in the County. 4.5.2. Policy: Public utilities shall be permitted in all future land use categories including planned residential developments and developments of regional impact provided the performance standards in the Power Plant Siting Act, Transmission Line Siting Act, Pinellas County Future Land Use and Quality Communities Element, Pinellas County Zoning Regulations, and any other applicable land development regulations are met. 4.6. Objective: Development and redevelopment activities along U.S. Highway 19 shall be consistent with state and local efforts to provide an efficient north/south limited access highway corridor within Pinellas County. 4.6.1. Policy: Mixed-use development, as provided in the Residential/ Office/Retail future land use designation, shall continue to be the preferred land use pattern along U.S. Highway 19. The restrictive floor area ratio and residential density requirements of this 32 designation shall be utilized to limit the impact of development upon the traffic carrying capacity of U.S. Highway 19. 4.6.2. Policy: The number of curb cuts on U.S. Highway 19 providing access to businesses and other development located along this corridor shall be kept to a minimum by requiring new development and redeveloped sites to provide access to adjacent projects whenever feasible. 4.6.3. Policy: As part of the County's sector planning program, Pinellas County, in coordination with affected local governments and agencies, shall study the U.S. Highway 19 corridor in north Pinellas County to determine if changes to the adjacent land use pattern could enhance both its function as a major commercial and employment corridor and as the primary north -south highway in the County. 4.7. Objective: The Future Land Use Element of the Pinellas County Comprehensive Plan shall be consistent with the Countywide Future Land Use Plan, including the categories, rules, policies, and procedures thereof. 4.7.1. Policy: Pinellas County shall, as a component of its Future Land Use and Quality Communities Element, establish and maintain consistency with the Countywide Future Land Use Plan and Rules. SECTION V: POLICY 1.2.1 OF THE CAPTIAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT OF THE PINELLAS COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: 1.2.1. Policy: County -funded infrastructure shall be prohibited within the coastal high hazafd storm area except for the following: 1. The expenditure is for the maintenance, repair or replacement of existing facilities; or 2. The expenditure is for restoration or enhancement of natural resources or public access; or 3. The expenditure is needed to address an existing deficiency identified in this plan; or 4. The expenditure is for the retrofitting of stormwater management facilities for water quality enhancement of stormwater runoff, or 5. The expenditure is for the development or improvement of pub4ie reads and bridges transportation facilities identified in the Transportation Element of this plan; or 6. The expenditure is for a public facility of overriding public interest as determined by the Board of County Commissioners. 33 SECTION VI: POLICY 1.3.1 OF THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT OF THE PINELLAS COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: 1.3.1. Policy: Pinellas County shall continue to implement its tfanspeftatieft multi -modal impact fee ordinance to finance transportation impfevemen mana eg_ment strategies necessitated by new development. SECTION VII: POLICY 1.5.1 OF THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT OF THE PINELLAS COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: 1.5.1. Policy: Upon plan adoption, Pinellas County shall use the following level of service standards in reviewing the impacts of new development and redevelopment upon public facility provision. Drainage All applicable federal, state, and local regulations (as indicated in the Regulatory Framework section of the Surface Water Management Element) relating to flood control, stormwater treatment and wetland protection, shall continue to be met in public and private project design. The twenty-five year storm design standard shall confine the runoff from a 25 year, 24 hour rainfall event, within drainage channel banks, or within designated twenty-five year floodplains, in order to protect human life and minimize property damage. The one -hundred year storm design standard shall protect homes and commercial buildings against flooding by a 100 year, 24 hour rainfall event. Preference shall be given to stormwater management options which restore floodplains and remove obstructions from floodways. Recreation Fourteen acres of County park and environmental lands for every 1,000 residents within the County. Solid Waste and Resource Recovery The level of service standard shall be to dispose of 1.30 tons per person per year. Water Supply Except as otherwise provided in the Master Water Supply Contract and in the associated Interlocal Agreement, all potable water required by Pinellas County Utilities to service its customers shall be supplied by Tampa Bay Water. In the event that Tampa Bay Water 34 determines that the regional system has experienced a "shortfall" or "production failure" as defined in the Interlocal Agreement, Pinellas County shall respond with one or more of the following actions and alternatives. 1. Institute additional water conservation measures; 2. Halt or otherwise restrict the issuance of development orders and permits; 3. Develop new sources of potable water within the parameters of the Interlocal Agreement; 4. Purchase potable water from suppliers other than Tampa Bay Water; 5. Cooperate with Tampa Bay Water, the Southwest Florida Water Management District, and the affected local governments to develop a regional response to the situation; and 6. Use actions and alternatives not identified within this policy. Pinellas County shall use the following Level of Service Standard when preparing its annual 5 - year and 20 -year potable water demand projections for the Pinellas County Water Demand Planning Area, which are required by the Master Water Supply contract to enable Tampa Bay Water to formulate its capital improvement program: Pinellas County Water Demand Planning Area (gpcd)* Year 1990 1994 1995 1997 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 gpcpd 150 145 135 125 125 120 120 120 115 115 To determine whether adequate capacity is available for a development or redevelopment project in the unincorporated County that is served by a municipal potable water system, Pinellas County will utilize the level of service standards adopted by the municipal service provider. Sanitary Sewer Pinellas County Utilities (PCU) shall provide the levels of service necessary for proper wastewater treatment, reuse and disposal in order to ensure the protection of its citizens and the environment and to provide adequate wastewater treatment capacity for all current and projected wastewater facility demands of Pinellas County Utility customers. Wastewater flows associated with existing and permitted development cannot exceed the wastewater treatment plant's permitted design capacity. Treated effluent and biosolids shall meet all pertinent federal, state and local standards and regulations for treatment, reuse and disposal. Pinellas County will, for concurrency management purposes, annually compare wastewater flows to permitted treatment capacity to determine the percentage of available capacity and 35 assess whether permitted treatment capacity exceeds the needs of existing and committed development. If available treatment capacity meets this standard, development can be permitted. Unpredictable situations where permitted capacity is temporarily exceeded due to unanticipated situations such as limited/extreme weather conditions shall not impact the determination of level of service conditions. Peak design flow capacity shall be between 1.5 and 2.5 times the average daily flow for each sanitary sewer system, based on the individual characteristics of the system. If an annual assessment evidences that a capacity deficit could occur within 10 years, Pinellas County Utilities will prepare a more detailed capacity analysis as directed by 62-600.405, F.A.C, and determine whether facility expansion is required or if the service area is built out. To determine whether adequate capacity is available for a development or redevelopment project in the unincorporated County that is served by a municipal wastewater system, Pinellas County will utilize the level of service standards adopted by the municipal service provider. Pinellas !' t ..halal use pa eies-undc-f Objeetive 1.1 of the T, ,..-r.,f; El^ .,t of the State and Alm these elie:^s shall be ed t,. ifnpleffiefit ,...,1 maintain the level f ser-viee st.,...1.fds F St„t^ and County .. Irl SECTION VIII: POLICY 1.5.4 OF THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT OF THE PINELLAS COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: 1.5.4. Policy: Pinellas County shall ensure that public facilities and services for which a level of service standard has been adopted and that are needed to support development will be available concurrent with the impacts of development. This policy shall.- be implemented through use of the Concurrency Management System adopted as part of the Pinellas County Coinprcl3elsi v e Plan. SECTION IX: POLICY 1.4.1 OF THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT OF THE PINELLAS COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: 36 1.4.1. Policy: As provided for within the Transportation Element, Pinellas County shall coordinate with the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority (PSTA) Pinellas Planning Council (PPC) and local governments concerning the implementation of the Pinellas County Mobility Plan and MPO corridor plans. the implefnentatien of jeng term eeneur-r-eney fAanageffient, the 14S Highway 19 Gefr-idef Aetien Plan, and any "Em, the Metr-epelitan Planning Ofganization, and SECTION X: POLICY 1.4.3 OF THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT OF THE PINELLAS COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: 1.4.3. Policy: Pinellas County shall continue to coordinate with the MPO, PSTA, FDOT and local governments )-in monitoring the performance of the:,. &ied *� the transportation system fmd the e-,*ent to „1 ieh it fneets t ceffient. SECTION XI: THE CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SECTION OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: I. PURPOSE The following statements contain the Pinellas County policy as it applies to establishing a Concurrency Management System for Pinellas County. II. DEFINITIONS A. Concurrency Management System The procedures and processes that Pinellas County shall utilize to ensure that Development Orders and permits when issued shall not result in a reduction of the adopted level of service standards at the time that the impact of development occurs except as defined in the Pinellas County Comprehensive Plan. 37 B. Concurrency GeAifieatiea Review Determination The eef4ifieatien Concurrency Review Determination, or finding by the County regarding whether a development proposal is subject to development limitations, and whether measures might be available to mitigate development impacts, based on the adopted Concurrency Test Statement. This finding is issued as a prerequisite to the issuance of any development order or development permit. The Geunty may issue deetimentatia" that At a minimum, the Concurrency Review Determination , shall include the following information: 1. Type of development proposal; 2. - Date of the, Gen ` - C p . Y.�_� Y� -}.Ci . __ .� _ »:i4 aifi�'ir:gJ -for a ucve opuio,u proposai, the + „heti,,,, egt6v 1164; and 3. Whether the development proposal is subject to development limitations, pufsuant to and any other limitations that may be identified in the adopted Concurrency Test Statement. DC. Concurrency Test Statement A public facility and service status report contained in Section 134 of the Pinellas County Land Development Code, annually approved and adopted by ordinance, which, at a minimum, establishes for eaeh.public facilityies and services, the following: 1. The existing and committed development in each service area; 2. The existing levels of service for each publie f6eility and sefyiee utilities, recreation and open space, and drainage; 4. Provisions and measufe 4heA shall apply within eeneuffeney management eeffidefs te 36. Updates of items 1 4, the above items, based upon the most recently adopted sear schedule of capital improvements from the Capital Improvements Element; and 46. The methods used in determining the nature of projected development impacts on public facilities and services for which a level of service standard has been adopted. 38 County reads tha4 are e -per -ming with defieient level of sefviee eenditiefis and that afte eemnatinifies� !ter .ee;xs"MrWW warw�w�rrww�i�www�ww�rw �1�i I NirW.W.i Ip M I -ID. Currently Available Revenue Sources An existing source and amount of revenue presently available to Pinellas County. It does not include Pinellas County's present intent to increase revenue sources which may require future action by the County. 3E. Public Facilities and Services which Must be Available Concurrent with the Impacts of Development. 39 Those covered by a comprehensive plan element for which level of service standards have been adopted by Pinellas County, which includes . sanitary sewer, solid waste, drainage, potable water, and recreation/open space and mass tfansA. KF. Final Local Development Order For purpose of this plan, a Final Development Order shall be that last discretionary approval necessary to carry out the development provided that the proposed project has been precisely defined. The last discretionary approval for a given type of development activity shall be as provided in Section 134 of the Land Development Code. Terms used in this definition shall be as defined in the Pinellas County Comprehensive Zoning and Land Development Code as subsequently adopted by the Board of County Commissioners. 1✓G. Final Site Plan Final site plan approval shall mean that a site development plan has been reviewed and approved by the appropriate Pinellas County Utilities,-Publie Wer4Es, and the departments of Envi.,..mnen for compliance with all currently applicable rules, regulations, and ordinances and has subsequently been reviewed, approved, and signed by the County Administrator. - . ! _ _! ! 40 VIM W- ..��resr:�rrrs •• • VIM W- --. fr." ifleltides the Sta •IN .• TRIM 9H. Lots of Record Either a lot or contiguous lots which exist under single ownership at time of adoption of this Comprehensive Plan and which are part of a subdivision, the plat of which has been recorded in the office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Pinellas County; or any parcel of land not part of a subdivision that has been officially recorded by deed in the office of the Clerk, provided such platted lot or parcel was of a size which met the minimum lot area requirement for the zoning district in which the lot or parcel was located at the time of recording, or provided that the deed for the lot or parcel was recorded prior to the effective date of zoning in the area where the lot is located. Notwithstanding the above, all lots of record shall also be consistent with any substandard lot provision contained in land development regulations developed pursuant to Section 163.3202, F.S. Statewide systefn ef high priority r-egional tr-anspe*4afiefl f4eilifies that ifleltides the Sta 41 1 7=:7 LUM om MM; �• • i pfeteet > , epfejeet phasing, afeej > wements> aeeess > > 1 7=:7 LUM om MM; �• • III. THE CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM The purpose of the Pinellas County Concurrency Management System is to ensure that facilities and services needed to support development are available concurrent with the impacts of such development. The concurrency management system requires that the adopted level of service standards for readways, potable water, sanitary sewer, solid waste, drainage, and recreation - be maintained. The Concurrency Management System shall ensure that issuance of a development order or development permit is conditioned upon the availability of public facilities and services for which a level of service standard has been adopted and that are necessary to serve new development, consistent with the provisions of Chapter 163, Part II, F.S., and Rule 9J-5, F.A.C. 42 A. Procedures 1. Application for Development - The concurrency management system is accessed by the property owner, or his/her representative, when an application for development containing the required documentation for the given development order or permit is submitted to the County. A Pinellas County representative shall then ascertain the completeness of the documentation, in a timely manner, to ensure that the required information is sufficient to accept the application for development for review. 2. When the application for a development order or permit has been accepted, it shall be processed and reviewed in accordance with adopted procedures. These procedures shall include a review of the application for development for reads; potable water, sanitary sewer, solid waste, drainage, and recreation and fnass tr-a +, as they may apply. 3. After an application for development is accepted, it will be compared to the most recently adopted Concurrency Test Statement. Pinellas County shall compare the application for development to the seven- (7) public facilities and services on the current Concurrency Test Statement, as they may apply to the location described on the application for development. 4-5. If the application for development is found by the latest Concurrency Test Statement to fall within an area with a deficient level of service for a facility or service for which a level of service standard has been adopted ethe f than reads, then a r of fifieat Concurrency Review Determination shall indicate, of its f tnefie~a' equivalent, shall state that development shall either not be authorized or be authorized with conditions to be identified in the Concurrency Test Statement. B. reef fi fieate of -Concurrency Review Determination - Continued Validity 1. The Gei4i fiee e eff Concurrency Review Determination, , shall indicate the date of issuance and will be valid for purposes of the issuance of development orders or permits for twelve months from date of issuance. 2. The Pinellas County Land Development Code shall specify the criteria determining the validity period for a development order, permit or application for development under an existing rem fiea4e of Concurrency Review Determination ems). FIN Oil -111k iNw- 4-5. If the application for development is found by the latest Concurrency Test Statement to fall within an area with a deficient level of service for a facility or service for which a level of service standard has been adopted ethe f than reads, then a r of fifieat Concurrency Review Determination shall indicate, of its f tnefie~a' equivalent, shall state that development shall either not be authorized or be authorized with conditions to be identified in the Concurrency Test Statement. B. reef fi fieate of -Concurrency Review Determination - Continued Validity 1. The Gei4i fiee e eff Concurrency Review Determination, , shall indicate the date of issuance and will be valid for purposes of the issuance of development orders or permits for twelve months from date of issuance. 2. The Pinellas County Land Development Code shall specify the criteria determining the validity period for a development order, permit or application for development under an existing rem fiea4e of Concurrency Review Determination ems). FIN 3. For those Gert-i€eeAe—of Concurrency Review Determinations issued for a development agreement entered into by Pinellas County, pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 163.3220-163.3243, F.S., as amended, the duration of such determinations Gei4ifieeAe of G,...,.......oney (ef its fi inetienal equivalent) as issued, shall be for the time period stated within the development agreement. C. Development Order or Development Permit Compliance. All development orders and development permits issued and approved shall be based upon and in compliance with, the Ge fti fieate of -Concurrency Review Determination (er its funetienal equivalent) issued for that development proposal. A development order or development permit shall be in. compliance _.with . its underlying Cei4ineate ef Concurrency. Review Determination if the impacts associated with that development order or development permit are equal to or less than the allocations made in association with the underlying rei4i fieate ef. Concurrency Review Determination. D. Concurrency Test Statement 1. - On an annual basis, a Concurrency Test Statement shall be developed for final adoption by the Board of County Commissioners. 2. The County shall monitor and assess the status of public facilities and services on an annual basis. Information derived through this process shall be reflected in the Concurrency Test Statement. 3. The remaining capacity reported for each public facility and service on the annual Concurrency Test Statement should be determined by calculating the existing demand as well as the committed impacts including those associated with multi-year, phased development proposals or projects (including Developments of Regional Impact, Development Agreements, etc.). 4. A Concurrency Test Statement shall be issued every year. Nothing herein precludes the issuance and effectiveness of amendments to the current Concurrency Test Statement if updating or correction is deemed necessary by the Board of County Commissioners for, including, but not limited to, the following circumstances: errors in preparation and adoption are noted; the impact of issued development orders or permits, as monitored by the Planning Department, indicate an unacceptable degradation to an adopted level of service; where changes in the status of capital improvement projects, of the State or any local government, changes the underlying assumptions of the current Concurrency Test Statement. 5. Under no circumstances will an amended Concurrency Test Statement divest those rights acquired, pursuant to approval of a development e= valid —eerfifieeAr under the Concurrency Test Statement as it existed prior to amendment, except where a divestiture of such rights is clearly 44 established by the Board of County Commissioners to be essential to the health, safety or welfare of the general public. IV. LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS A. For the purpose of issuance of development orders and permits, Pinellas County shall adopt level of service standards for public facilities and services within Pinellas County for which Pinellas County has authority to issue development orders and permits. For the purposes of concurrency, public facilities and services include the following for which level of service standards shall be adopted: 1) r-eads, 2) sanitary sewer, 32) solid waste, 42) drainage, �4) potable water, and 65) recreation s If Pinellas County desires to make other public facilities and services subject to the concurrency management system, level of service standards of such additional facilities and services must be adopted in the comprehensive plan. B. The Capital Improvements Element shall set forth a financial feasibility plan which demonstrates that Pinellas County can achieve and maintain the adopted level of service standards. eer: �. 6 Y. MOM. 2MVP WTM . . . V. MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR CONCURRENCY A concurrency management system shall be developed and adopted to ensure that public facilities and services needed to support development are available concurrent with the impacts of such developments. M A. For potable water, sewer, solid waste, and drainage, at a minimum, provisions in the Pinellas County Comprehensive Plan and the Concurrency Test Statement that ensure that the following standards shall be met will satisfy the concurrency requirement: 1. The necessary facilities and services are in place at the time a development order or permit is issued; 2. A development order or permit is issued subject to the condition that, at the time of the issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent, the necessary facilities and services are in place and available to serve the new development; or 3. At the time the development order, or permit is issued, the necessary facilities and services are guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement that includes the provisions of V. A. 1 and 2 of this section. An enforceable development agreement includes development agreements pursuant to Section 163.3220, Florida Statutes, or an agreement or development order issued pursuant to Chapter 380, Florida Statutes. B. For recreation, Pinellas County shall satisfy the concurrencv. rern> rl m 'qt with the following standards: 1. At the time the development order or permit is issued, the necessary facilities and services are in place or under actual construction; or 2. A development order or permit is issued subject to the condition that, at the time of the issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent, the acreage for the necessary facilities and services to serve the new development is dedicated or acquired by the local government, or funds in the amount of the developer's fair share are committed; and a33. A development order or permit is issued subject to the conditions that the necessary facilities and services needed to serve the new development are scheduled to be in place or under actual construction not more than one year after issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent as provided in the adopted 6 -year schedule of capital improvements in the Pinellas County Capital Improvements Element; or b-}4. At the time the development order or permit is issued, the necessary facilities and services are the subject of a binding executed agreement which requires the necessary facilities and services to serve the new development to be in place or under actual construction not more than one year after issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent; or c-)5. At the time the development order or permit is issued, the necessary facilities and services are guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement, pursuant to Section 163.3220, Florida Statutes, or an agreement or development order issued pursuant to Chapter 380, Florida Statutes, to be in place or under actual construction 46 not more than one year after issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent. _r.Te!Etrf MINIM if 47 . ..... . . ........ . .......... . . ..... 1. - MR WIN.. . . ....... ....... _r.Te!Etrf MINIM if 47 • •INK MR N j- ;;, mig-4 48 - - - -rN on •M01 at -NN. • •INK MR N j- ;;, mig-4 48 KID ZM. W111111111M ..lliii!111 SECTION XII: SEVERABILITY If any section, paragraph, clause, sentence, or provision of the Ordinance shall be adjudged by any Court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such judgment shall not affect, impair, invalidate, or nullify the remainder of this Ordinance, but the effect therefore shall be confined to the section, paragraph, clause, sentence, or provision immediately involved in the controversy in which such judgment or decree shall be rendered. SECTION XIII: LOCATION OF RECORDS Pursuant to requirements of Section 125.68, Florida Statutes, this Ordinance to amend the Pinellas County Comprehensive Plan is incorporated into the Transportation Element of the Pinellas County Comprehensive Plan, located at, and maintained by, the Clerk of the Pinellas County Board of County Commissioners. SECTION XIV: FILING OF ORDINANCE: ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE Pursuant to Section 163.3184(3), Florida Statutes, if not timely challenged, an amendment adopted under the expedited provisions of this section shall not become effective until 31 days after adoption. If timely challenged, the amendment shall not become effective until the state land planning agency or the Administration Commission enters a final order determining the adopted amendment to be in compliance. No development orders, development permits, or land uses dependent on this Amendment may be issued or commence before the amendment has become effective. 49 PP-'I PINELLAS AA PLANNING % 4. COUNCIL COUNCIL MEMBERS 310 Court Street, Clearwater, FL 33756-5137 Councilmember Jim Kennedy, Chair Telephone 727-464-8250 - Fax 727-464-8212 Commissioner John Morroni, Vice -Chair www.pinellasplanningcouncil.org Commissioner Joanne "Cookie" Kennedy, Secretary Councilmember Doreen Hock-DiPolito, Treasurer Mayor Sandra Bradbury Mayor Julie Ward Bujalski Commissioner Dave Eggers Commissioner Cliff Merz Deputy Mayor Kevin Piccarreto January 12, 2016 Councilmember Darden Rice Commissioner Karen Williams Seel Mr. Kyle Brotherton, Planner Commissioner Michael Smith Commissioner John Tornga Planning & Development. Department _ _ _ _ a City of Clearwater Whit Blanton, FAICP 100 South Myrtle Avenue Executive Director P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, Florida 33758-4748 RE: Consistency Review of Ord. No. 8805-16 and 8806-16 Dear Kyle: Thank you for forwarding the proposed amendments to the City's comprehensive plan. Pursuant to Division 3.3 of the Countywide Rules, Pinellas Planning Council (PPC) staff have reviewed the amendments for consistency with the Countywide Plan Map and Rules. Our findings are as follows: Ord. No. 8805-16 The proposed comprehensive plan amendments removing references to transportation concurrency and estaiwishing a mobility management system in the Future Land Use, Transportation, and Capital Improvements Elements; recognizing the Interlocal Service Boundary Agreement between Pinellas County and municipalities in the Future Land Use Element; and addressing statutory requirements to encourage reduction of flood risk in the Coastal Management Element are not subject to the consistency criteria of the Countywide Rules. Ord. No. 8806-16 The proposed code amendments replacing provisions for transportation concurrency and proportionate fair -share with a mobility management system and multi -modal impact fee are not subject to the consistency criteria of the Countywide Rules. PLANNING FOR THE PINELLAS COMMUNITY Other While not required as part of this consistency review, the amendments have been forwarded to staff of the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for tracking and courtesy review. Any MPO staff suggestions will be forwarded to City staff. As a general reminder, per the provisions of Countywide Rules Section 4.2.2.1, we recommend that the City adopt a table or matrix in the Future Land Use Element that shows each local future land use category corresponding to one of the Countywide Plan Map categories; and per the provisions of Countywide Rules Section 4.2.7.3, we reconunend that the City amend its comprehensive plan or land development code to adopt requirements. governing local future land use map amendments in the Coastal High Hazard Area that are consistent with the balancing criteria found in Countywide Rules Section 4.2.7.1 A -H. Thank you for forwarding the proposed amendments for review. We recognize that the consistency process is an ongoing one and if either the City or the Council staff has failed to note a matter governed by the consistency process in the course of this review, we will be happy to work with you to resolve any such matter as may be necessary. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 464-8250. Sincerely, R r Linda Fisher, AIC Principal Planner cc: Councilmember Doreen Hock-DiPolito, PPC Representative From: Matzke Lauren To: Brotherton. Kyle Subject: FW: Mobility amendments Date: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 2:49:24 PM For your files. -----Original Message ----- From: Bartolotta, Al [maiIto :abartolotta(a co. pinellas.fl.us] Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 10:19 AM To: Matzke, Lauren Subject: RE: Mobility amendments Hey Lauren, Correct. Any objectives or policies tied to an LOS standard for roads would no longer be in play with the mobility changes. Al Bartolotta Planning Section Manager Pinellas County MPO (727) 464-8250 abartolotta@pinellascounty.org www.pinellascounty.org Subscribe to county updates and news All government correspondence is subject to the public records law. -----Original Message ----- From: Lauren. Matzke@MyClearwater.com [ Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 8:47 AM To: Bartolotta, Al Subject: Mobility amendments Al, I'm reviewing amendments someone on my team drafted re Mobility. I think, if I'm reading this correctly and I understand the County's changes, that this Objective and policies are not applicable anymore because the County is eliminating similar standards from its CP (former Objective 1.1 and subsequent policies). Before I suggest a full removal I wanted to confirm. I'm admittedly jumping between things so much right now I have less solid understanding of this work. I've attached a photo of our policies. Thanks for your help! �C��odt('ryv�n�-rl �C�3 .�1� �C�/. `��.� . C• c�i p_, n MOBILITY PLAN POLICIES 1. GOAL: PROVIDE FOR A SAFE, CONVENIENT, AND ENERGY EFFICIENT MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM THAT SERVES TO INCREASE MOBILITY, REDUCE THE INCIDENCE OF SINGLE -OCCUPANT VEHICLES, EFFICIENTLY UTILIZE ROADWAY CAPACITY, REDUCE THE CONTRIBUTION TO AIR POLLUTION FROM MOTORIZED VEHICLES AND IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF LIFE FOR THE CITIZENS OF PINELLAS COUNTY. 1.1 Objective: Maintain the performance of the major road network within the County while furthering development of a multi -modal transportation system that increases mobility for bicyclists, pedestrians and transit users as well as motorists. 1.1.1 Policy: [Local government] shall manage the impacts of land development projects and increase mobility through application of Transportation Element policies and Land Development Code provisions through the site plan review process in accordance with the Pinellas County Mobility Plan. 1.1.2 Policy: The land development regulatory system shall include the identification of "deficient" roadways, including facilities operating at peak hour level of service (LOS) E and F and/or volume -to -capacity (v/c) ratio 0.9 or greater without a mitigating improvement scheduled for construction within three years. Deficient roads will be identified through the annual MPO Level of Service Report. 1.1.3 Policy: [Local government] shall utilize impact fee revenue to fund multi -modal improvements to local, county or state facilities that are consistent with the comprehensive plan as well as the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Long Range Transportation Plan. 1.1.4 Policy: [Local government] shall work cooperatively with the MPO and other local governments to complete the biennial update of the Multi -modal Impact Fee Ordinance through the MPO planning process, which includes review by the MPO Technical Coordinating Committee and MPO Policy Board. 1.1.5 Policy: [Local government] shall continue to work with the Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority (PSTA) to increase the efficiency of the fixed -route system by encouraging mass transit use through the application of the Pinellas County Mobility Plan and the [local government] Site Plan Review Process. 1.1.6. Policy: [Local government] shall work with the MPO and other local governments to coordinate the application of the Pinellas County Mobility Plan throughout the County. 1 Note: The aforementioned goal, objective and policies are recommended for inclusion in the transportation elements of local comprehensive plans. Existing goals, objectives and policies referencing transportation concurrency throughout the comprehensive plan should be revised or removed as necessary. It is also recommended that supporting polices be included in other comprehensive plan elements that affect transportation planning, including elements addressing capital improvements, intergovernmental coordination and future land use. 2 MOBILITY PLAN CODE PROVISIONS Definitions Deficient facility means a road operating at peak hour level of service E or F, and/or a volume - to -capacity (v/c) ratio of 0.9 or higher with no mitigating improvements scheduled within three years. Land Development Regulatory System is the coordinated system of plans (e.g., comprehensive plans), regulations, code provisions and related status reports (e.g., concurrency test statement and transportation system report) that provide standards and guidance for land development related activities. New peak hour trip refers to a vehicle trip added to the major road network from and to a developed parcel of land during the weekday peak hour. This excludes "passer-by" or "diverted" trips, whereby the site is accessed as a secondary trip. Mobility plan is the framework providing for a countywide approach to managing the traffic impacts of development projects and to increasing mobility for pedestrians, bicyclists, transit users and motor vehicles through the implementation of the Multi -modal Impact Fee Ordinance and the transportation provisions of this section through the site plan review process. Peak hour, in describing traffic conditions, is the 100th highest volume hour of the year in the predominant traffic flow direction. Pre-existing use refers to the land use that occupied a parcel of land prior to the submittal of a permit/site plan application. In accordance with the Pinellas County Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance (TIFO), development projects are entitled to a credit equivalent to the impact fee assessment of any land use activity that existed on the property as of June 30, 1986, the original adoption date of the TIFO. The applicant must provide the necessary documentation to verify any pre-existing use activity not reflected in the current records of the Pinellas County Property Appraiser's Office. Transportation management plan, as developed by an applicant representing a proposed development, is submitted in conjunction with individual site plans seeking to utilize transportation management strategies to address their development impacts, protect roadway capacity and to increase mobility. These strategies include, but are not limited to, density/intensity reductions, project phasing, access controls, capital improvements and/or incentives encouraging mass transit, bicycle or pedestrian travel, ride -sharing or roadway improvements. Strategies that are standard site plan review requirements would not be eligible for inclusion in a transportation management plan. Transportation Management Plans must be submitted to the [Department of ] for review and approval. 3 Transportation management system refers to the management of development impacts on transportation facilities and implementation of mobility improvements pursuant to the Mobility Plan. (Note: This is intended to replace references to concurrency management system pertaining to transportation). Legislative Findings 1) Florida House Bill 7207, the Community Planning Act, was legislated in 2011. The Act eliminated state mandated concurrency management requirements related to transportation facilities for local governments. 2) In 2013, the Pinellas County Metropolitan Planning Organization approved the Pinellas County Mobility Plan Report. The intent of the Mobility Plan is to replace local transportation concurrency management programs with a system that provides local governments with the means to manage the traffic impacts of development projects without requiring developers to meet adopted level of service standards. 3) The transportation element of the comprehensive plan identifies a number of highway system facilities operating under deficient level of service conditions. These require the application of Mobility Plan provisions in order to manage transportation impacts and to increase mobility through the use of multi -modal impact fees to fund transportation improvements. 4) The 2012 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21St Century (MAP 21) Act, which sets forth requirements for metropolitan transportation planning, promotes integrated transportation systems that maximize mobility and accessibility and the preservation, rather than the construction, of highways. 5) The [local government] comprehensive plan provides data, analysis, and policies supporting the intent of the [local government] to manage the impacts of development on facilities operating with deficient level of service conditions through the application of the Pinellas County Mobility Plan and supporting land use policies. 6) Transportation management plan strategies are important tools for local governments to manage development impacts while maximizing mobility and accessibility consistent with the comprehensive plan and MAP 21. , 7) The Community Planning Act encourages the coordination of planning and growth management activities among local governments, the Metropolitan Planning Organization and regional and state government agencies. Purpose and Intent It is the purpose of this division to establish a transportation management system to ensure that the impacts of development on transportation facilities and services are effectively managed while increasing mobility for pedestrians, bicyclists, transit users and motor vehicles. 4 Transportation Management Plan 1) Transportation management plans are to be submitted by applicants of development projects in conjunction with their site plans. Transportation management plans are required for development applications seeking to utilize transportation management strategies/improvements to address their development impacts. The extent of the strategies/improvements included in an approved transportation management plan in terms of the scale of the project(s) and roadway capacity and/or mobility benefits provided shall be based primarily on the projected impact of the development project on the surrounding traffic circulation system. Specific conditions of the deficient road corridor impacted by the development will also be considered. Transportation management plan strategies/improvements applicable to development projects within deficient road corridors will be determined at the time of site plan review. Should the impacts of the development project impact a road under the jurisdiction of an adjacent local government or FDOT, the identification of appropriate TMP strategies shall be coordinated with the affected jurisdiction(s). Transportation management plans must be developed by the applicant and accepted by the [local government]. Transportation management plan strategies/improvements include, but are not limited to those listed below. a. Intensity reduction. The intensity of the proposal may be reduced through an across-the- board reduction of the permitted floor area ratio, as it would otherwise normally apply to the proposal. Other such corrective actions that would reduce the intensity of the proposal may also apply. b. Density reduction. The density of the proposal may be decreased by a reduction in the number of units per acre below that which would otherwise normally apply to the proposal. c. Project phasing. A project may be divided into logical phases of development by area, with later phases of the development proposal's approval withheld until the needed facilities are available. d. Outparcel deletion. Those portions of the proposal characterized as outparcels that create separate and unique impacts may be deleted from the total proposal. e. Physical highway improvements. A project may construct link capacity improvements, acceleration/deceleration lanes, intersection improvements or frontage roads. f. Operational improvements (signal). This includes efforts involving signal removal or signal timing improvements. g. Access management strategies. These include access management controls such as the preclusion of a direct connection to a deficient facility, right-in/right-out driveways, alternative driveway locations, reduction of a driveway, single point access, shared access or the implementation of median controls. h. Mass transit initiatives. A project may implement a plan to encourage transit (e.g., employer -issued bus passes). Other mass transit initiatives may include, but are not limited to, direct route subsidies, provision of feeder service or the construction of bus stop amenities, bus pull -off areas and dedication of park and ride parking spaces. 5 i. Demand management/commuter assistance. These include efforts to encourage ride - sharing (e.g., designated parking spaces for carpools, employer-sponsored carpool program, participation in transportation management organization/initiative programs), and to implement flexible work hour and telecommuting programs. j. Bicycle/pedestrian improvements. These would involve structural improvements or construction of a bikeway or sidewalk connecting an existing bikeway/sidewalk network or providing access to a school, park, shopping center, etc. These improvements may also include pedestrian treatments in parking areas, sidewalks connecting developments with adjacent land uses, trail improvements and bicycle rack and on -street bicycle lane installations, and the planting of trees to provide shade canopy along sidewalks. k. Intelligent transportation system improvements. This includes improvements pertaining to computerized traffic signal systems that automatically adjust to maximize traffic flow and to permit emergency vehicles to pass through intersections quickly. It also includes freeway management systems, such as electronic message signs, and electronic fare payment on public buses that reduce passenger boarding time. Livable community site design features. These include, but are not limited to, implementation of pedestrian friendly site design features such as orienting buildings toward the street and parking lots to the side or rear of buildings. 2) Transportation management plans seeking to implement strategies that do not involve structural improvements, such as ride -sharing and transit incentive programs, must include a monitoring program to ensure the strategies are carried out in accordance with the plan, as developed by the applicant and accepted by the [local government]. Deficient Road Corridors, Transportation Management Plan Strategies Applied 1) Deficient road corridors include parcels within one-half mile of the centerline or terminus of a facility operating under a deficient level of service. 2) In support of the provisions of this section regarding deficient road corridors, policies in the comprehensive plan seek to discourage future land use map (FLUM) amendments that allow for an increase in automobile trips generated from sites proposed for amendment. It is recognized that exceptions to this provision may apply within road corridors where the local government comprehensive plan is seeking increased densities and intensities for planning purposes. 3) Development projects located within deficient road corridors that generate between 51 and 300 new peak hour trips are classified as tier 1. a. Developers of tier 1 projects are required to submit a transportation management plan designed to address their impacts while increasing mobility and reducing the demand for single occupant vehicle travel. b. The cost of transportation management strategies implemented for tier 1 projects are creditable toward their multi -modal impact fee assessment in accordance with the Multi -modal Impact Fee Ordinance. If the cost of the improvement exceeds the assessment, the development project would not be subject to payment of the fee. R1 4) Development projects located within deficient road corridors that generate more than 300 new peak hour trips are classified as tier 2. Developers of tier 2 projects are required to conduct a traffic study and submit an accompanying report. The report shall include the results of the traffic study and a transportation management plan identifying improvements necessary to mitigate the impacts of the project. The report shall be submitted to the [ Department] for review. The cost of transportation management strategies implemented for tier 2 projects may be applied as credit toward the project's multi -modal impact fee assessment in accordance with the Multi -modal Impact Fee Ordinance or payment of the fee could be included as part of a transportation management plan. 5) Development projects that generate less than 51 new peak hour trips are required to pay a multi -modal impact fee in accordance with the Multi -modal Impact Fee Ordinance. They are not required to submit a transportation management plan or traffic study. 6) A traffic study and corresponding transportation management plan for a land development project generating more than 50 new peak hour trips outside a deficient road corridor may be required if through the site plan review process the local government determines that operational improvements such as intersection or median modifications are necessary to accommodate the additional trips generated by the proposed land use. Methodology Applied Determination of trip generation shall be based on the Pinellas County Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance fee schedules and latest edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual. Note: The aforementioned code provisions are recommended for inclusion in local land development codes. Existing code sections that contain language referencing or relating to transportation concurrency should be revised or removed as necessary. 7 Goals. Objectives and Policies Th pnse[A Transportation B. TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT The purpose of the Transportation Element is to plan for a multi -modal transportation system in Clearwater which includes public transit, bicycling, walking, air travel, rail facilities, vehicular traffic and parking facilities, establish intermodal connections and support the Future Land Use Element. Transportation Needs Summary The following summarizes Clearwater's transportation needs: Traffic Circulation • Multi -modal transportation improvements to Clearwater Beach should continue to be planned and/or utilized to alleviate traffic congestion and parking demands on the Memorial Causeway and the beach. • Access management to improve traffic flow will continue to be an important issue in development reviews, with particular emphasis on congested links. • Th traffic concurrency system will continue to monitor vehicle trips on the roadway system • Belleair Road (CR462) and Clearwater Memorial Causeway (SR60) are physically and/or environmentally constrained and will continue to operate below the acceptable levels -of -service. • The City will continue to work with Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), Tampa Bay Area Regional Transportation Authority (TBARTA), Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority (PSTA) and other agencies to promote transportation alternatives and demand management. • Recent and proposed FDOT improvements including new overpasses, frontage roads, and limited access to U.S. 19 are alleviating prior capacity issues that were due to both local traffic from adjacent development and regional movement, the control of which was beyond Clearwater's jurisdiction. Mass Transit • Mass transit service is provided by the system of buses operated by the Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority (PSTA). All arterial and collector streets in the City are now served by PSTA. • Fixed route service is generally adequate to provide service to low income and areas of elderly .----- concentration. Elderly and handicapped transportation is supplemented by dial -a -ride service. • Mass transit service is operated by a countywide agency subsidized by State and Federal funds and Ad Valorem taxes. • Mass transit provisions should be included in future road expansions to allow for more efficient commuter patterns. B-1 r+�alily P14"' v�enh �s • Clearwater Airpark is a general aviation airport with no control tower, it has a oals Objectives and Policies �t w� Trans rtaUon GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES TRAFFIC CIRCULATION 1 GOAL - THE TRAFFI CHICULATION SYSTEM SHALL PROVIDE FOR THE SAFE, CONVENIENT AND EFFICIENT DELIVERY OF PEOPLE AND GOODS OTH LOCALLY AND REGIONALLY BY [A MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM. Comment [KBl]: Based on County's Mobility --......- ------ - ---------... - ._ _ plan wording. B.1.1 Objective - Every expansion or extension of arterial and collector streets shall be 51na�� constructed consistent with Florida Department of Transportation engineering rn` � standardsEFuture improvements to arterial and collector streets shall include, where �� possible, enhanced design to accommodate bicycle/pedestrian traffic^^� Policies n B.1.1.1 The City shall continue to administer access management and right-of-way ' , L. 5 Y `Q `� te, requirements through the Community Development Code. 1.1.2 The City will promote programs that ensure physical safety of non-motorized �� • " transportation users in accordance with the City's Shing Gears: Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan. B.1.2 Objective - Traffic signals along arterials and collectors in the City and adjacent to the City will be operated by a central computer system. Policies B.1.2.1 Clearwater shall work with Pinellas County and engineering consultants to 2 • �• continue the implementation of the computerized traffic signal system, The Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) Master Plan, covering all of Clearwater and adjacent areas. B.1.2.2 The City shall continue to monitor the effectiveness of the Intelligent Transportation System (ITS), the City's implemented computerized traffic signal system. 13.1.2.3 The City shall monitor accident totals for all major intersections in the City. Intersections with the worst accident rates should be established as priorities for improvements when possible. B.1.3 Objective - The City will continue to monitor traffic counts, accidents, and road improvements, to provide timely status evaluation of level of service conditions for issuance of development approvals. Policies �.1 L3 1 Provide fora safe and secure transprtation system for allusers Comment [KB2]: County M.W14y Pian 13.1.3.4-2 Requests for amendment to the Future Land Use Map will have an analysis of traffic impacts. B-3 B.1.4 B-4 � S Goals. Objectives and Policies Transportation shall be coordinated with the FDOT and the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) to assess Impacts on US 19. V -1 B.1.4.6 of a . ' Powar - - COmrnCnt [KBS]: Can keepdelete; modify. ti -modal im act fee assessments ma b a _ .. _._ -- rhA�:.o+ 13.1.4.7 Re City shall eeepefate Yitb the MPO te eftsuye eonsistene between ee*fehensive T-^~ ~^t ~'^ionrp Plan ( DTP) 2025 A traffic study and/or TMP for a development pro ject not impacting a deficient road corridor shall be Muired if necessary to address the impact of additional trips generated by the project on the surrounding traffic circulation 2gLlem.Comment [KB6]: County Mobility Plan B.1.4.8 Deficient roads shall include those operating at peak hour level of service (LOS) E and F and/or volume -to -capacity ration 0.9 or greater without a mitigating improvement scheduled for construction within three years. B.1.4.9 Multi -modal impact fee revenue shall be utilized to fund multi -modal improvements to local facilities that are consistent with the comprehensive plan as well as the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) 2022035. B.1.5 Objective - All County roadways in Clearwater, except those identified as backlogged or constrained by the Pinellas County MPO, shall operate at level C average daily/D peak hour. Policies B.1.5.1 Acceptable peak -hour Levels -of -Service for arterial and collector streets as listed in the MPO's current "Level -of -Service Inventory Report" are the desired minimum levels. B.1.5.2 The City shall provide the MPO with available up-to-date traffic data, such as signal timings and traffic counts to assist with level -of -service monitoring and development of the MPO's Long Range Transportation Plan. B.1.5.3 Due to unique conditions of the natural and built environments, and/or seasonal traffic demand, Belleair Road and Clearwater Memorial Causeway shall be considered environmentally constrained facilities. B.1.5.4 The City shall ensure that comprehensive plan amendments are consistent with the Florida Department of Transportation's (FDOT) statewide minimum levels of service standards for roadway facilities. B.1.5.5 The City shall continue to participate with the MPO and/or its Technical Coordinating Committee (TCC) to ensure that the level of service standard for US B-5 Goals. Objectives and Policies Transportation Highway 19, a Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) facility is consistent with FDOT's LOS designation of D for this road. B.1.5.6 Recognize the LOS standard of C average daily/D peak hour and volume/capacity ratio of 0.9 on roads under county jurisdiction, in accordance with the MPO's countywide concurrency management standards. B.1.6 4 --"Objective — The City shall monitor seasonal traffic on Clearwater Beach and explore methods to address any issues identified. Policies B.1.6.1 The City shall evaluate the feasibility of traffic improvements on Clearwater Beach, as well as investigate funding sources for such improvements. B.1.7 Objective — The natural, recreational, scenic, historic, and cultural resources of the Courtney Campbell Causeway shall be preserved and enhanced for the City of Clearwater residents. Policies B.1.7.1 The City shall support the mission and goals, objectives and strategies of the Courtney Campbell Causeway Florida Scenic Highway designation as approved by the City Council on July 15, 2004 for the causeway located between McMullen Booth Road and Veteran's Highway as shown on Citywide Design Structure Map A-14 in the Future Land Use Element. B.1.7.2 The City shall support efforts to retain the current physical cross sectional character of the causeway reminiscent of its historic origin. B.1.7.3 The City shall participate in efforts to maintain the natural environment by supporting a coastal -style, native Florida landscape and promoting community partnerships to control litter on the causeway. B.1.7.4 The City shall support FDOT's pedestrian, bicycle and transportation initiatives for the causeway including safety enhancements. B.1.7.5 The City shall continue to participate with the Corridor Management Entity (CME) as an ongoing and effective sponsor and advocate for the Scenic Highway designation process and implementation of improvements. B.1.7.6 The City shall continue to cooperate with intergovernmental coordination efforts as one of the four governmental entities that include City of Clearwater, Pinellas County, City of Tampa and Hillsborough County. B.1.7.7 The City shall participate in the education program efforts for promoting the location and features of the causeway B-6 Goals Objectives and Policies Transportation Policies B.1.7.8 The City shall participate in the maintenance and enhancements of the recreational opportunities along the causeway and in establishing the Causeway as a tourist point of interest. B.1.7.9 The City shall cooperate with FDOT's enhancement efforts to improve the visual appearance of the causeway. Comment [KS7]: New Objective and Policies - - - - - .- based on County Mobility Plan, can look at and figure out which to do now, Which to do with the EAR 1.9. 1 The City shall incorporate bicycle friendly design standards into all new and reconstructed collector and arterial roads by providing an area where big lists in" travel adjacent to the outside vehicle land. Bicycle -friendly standards may be implemented at the next resurfacing by ad l✓usting the vehicle lane widths to a / minimum of l 1 feet. J shall be designated by signage and markings. B 1 8.4 A bicycle lane shall not be designated in areas where the intended bicycle lane would not meet minimum width standards. The width of the vehicle lane(s) shall be set at the minimum width standards with the outside lane made as wide as possible. B l 8 5 Ibe planned Pinellas Trail Loon is critically important to allow bicycling and walking to become a more viable alternative for commuter travel throughout Pinellas County. The City shall continue to work with the County to "prioritize efforts to develop the Pinellas Trail Loopy __.....--{ Comma►t [KB9]: stili gaps within pity limits. 1 8 6 The City shall require development projects to make adequate provisions for _ bicycle parkingand storage asappropriate------------------ - ---------- ----=ment[Ks1al:Delray Beach Policy D-34is similar B.1.8.7 The City shall require sidewalks where feasible alongside roadways scheduled for resurfacing. 1:8.8 The Cily shall require construction of frontage sidewalks in all road rights -of - ,way where feasible (Cornment [KBii]: similar to St Pete's T16.6 ............. (B 1 8 14 The Clay shall incorporate livable community requirements such as spparated/buffered walkways connecting, pedestrian facilities existing_ within adjacent road rights-of-way to buildings proposed for construction. As an B-7 Comment [KO12]: Similar to St. Peres T16.8 _ - - Goals Objectives and Policies Transportation Policies C) No new traffic signals that will reduce peak hour travel speeds will be permitted, unless a high accident rate exists. D) New or revised median openings will only be permitted where they do not impede free flow of traffic. E) Additional service enhancements, as appropriate. 13.2.2.1 The City shall require as a condition of permit approval, new development and redevelopment projects adjacent to state roads to obtain FDOT permits as required. B.2.2.2 Access points to collector and arterial streets from all development should be limited to one (1) major access point or curb cut along each roadway frontage; additional access and egress points may be granted for unusually large parcels, based on site characteristics or as considered appropriate by the Traffic Engineer and approving agencies, to provide for safe and efficient site -related traffic movements on adjacent street. 13.2.2.3 As a condition of site plan or subdivision plat approval for development or redevelopment, the access or egress points, or approved cross access easements to major collector or arterial streets may be relocated, restricted or otherwise controlled to facilitate traffic flow along the adjacent thoroughfare. 13.2.2.4 Out -parcels, created in previously approved developments, shall have no inherent right of direct access to major collector or arterial streets unless such access is the only access available to the property. New out -parcels a denied direct access to arterial or collector streets, unless approved byllFlorida D.O. . when the development abuts a State road. B.2.2.5 Where appropriate, primary access on backlogged streets should be directed to adjacent non-residential collector streets, with limited secondary access to adjacent arterials. B.2.3 Objective - The City of Clearwater shall annually update the City's Transportation Improvement Program to include projects that increase the capacity of roadways, and provide input in the update of the Metropolitan Planning Organization's _ (MPO) Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) involving County and State roads. The following transportation improvement projects that will enhance road capacity are scheduled for construction within City, County and State work programs for FY2008/09-2012/13: • Sunset Point Road US 19A to Keene Road County Summary: Construct to a 2 lane divided urban arterial roadway • McMullen Booth Road at Drew Street County Summary: Construct southbound right turn lane and extend left turn lanes • McMullen Booth Road at Enterprise Road County B-9 Goals. Obiectives and Policies Transportation B.2.5.2 The City's mission, vision and/or initiatives will continue to include transportation improvements as articulated in the annual budget document. B.2.6 Objective - The City shall preserve and protect existing and future transportation corridors by administering Article 3 of the Land Development Code, Division 9, General Applicability Standards which incorporate FDOT's Stand Specifications - and Roadway and Traffic and Design Standards and Clearwater's Subdivision Ordinance identify building setbacks to protect rights-of-way in accordance with the Pinellas County Future Rights -of -Way map. Goals Objectives and Policies Transportation B.2.6.1 The City shall protect existing and future transportation corridors by implementing the requirements of the subdivision ordinance, including mandatory dedication of rights-of-way, where required, as a condition of plat approval. B.2.6.2 The City shall require developer dedication of rights-of-way for all new development or redevelopment projects in the City where necessary. B.2.6.3 The City shall review all site plans and subdivision plats with consideration of future right-of-way needs, and shall require the preservation and advance acquisition of right-of-way prior to or concurrent with land development to the maximum extent feasible. MASS TRANSIT B.3 GOAL -THE CITY SHALL SUPPORT THE EFFORTS O MASS TRANSIT SERVICE OPERATORS TO PROVIDE GENERALIZED AND S —i RA SERVICES. B.3.1 Objective - Existing and future major trip generators should be provided with fixed route or para transit service when possible Policies B.3.1.1 Clearwater supports adequate funding for the Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority (PSTA) to provide fixed route and demand -responsive transit service to increase the mobility of the transit service population. B.3.2 Objective - The City of Clearwater shall encourage and promote mass transit with appropriate land use, zoning and land development policies. Policies B.3.2.1 Clearwater shall allow the establishment of park-and-ride lots, and smaller outlying terminals where appropriate, to support the operation of the main P.S.T. terminal in downtown. B.3.2.2 Clearwater shall coordinate planning efforts, where applicable, for future high-- speed rail in Hillsborough and Pinellas Counties. B.3.2.3 The City will encourage the development of water mass transit service between the mainland and beach destinations. B.4 GOAL - THE CITY SHALL CONTINUE TO ACTIVELY SUPPORT AND PARTICIPATE IN PSTA, THE DIRECT PRIMARY TRANSIT SERVICE PROVIDER IN THE CITY OF CLEARWATER r lV VV o w0 B.4.1 Objective - The City shall require that large scale developments (greater than fifty PVJWA [50] units) of housing specifically proposed to serve elderly, handicapped or low income populations either locate within one thousand (1,000) feet of an existing bus c MP B-11 Goals. Objectives and Policies Transportation Policies route; if service is not presently available the PSTA shall be petitioned to provide service. B.4.1.1 Whenever possible, community serving facilities and public offices should be located within one thousand (1,000) feet of an existing bus route. B.4.1.2 The City adopts one thousand (1,000) feet as the desired level of service standard for transit service to be applied as the minimum for all major generators and attractors or for all census tracts with a concentration of elderly, handicapped, low income or non -automobile owning households. B.4.2 Objective — Clearwater shall participate with the MPO in coordinating the planning and implementation of the Pinellas Mobility Initiative and the Pinellas Guideway which is intended to connect the beach and the downtown. Policies B.4.2.1 The City shall ensure that the proposed guideway corridors planned by the Pinellas Mobility Initiative and the Pinellas Guideway are protected from encroachment, where possible. B.4.2.2 Acquisition of future mass transit corridors and exclusive right-of-way should be considered eligible expenditures for use of transportation impact fees and for right-of-way at time of site plan or plat approval, once the corridors have been included in adopted corridor and right-of-way designation maps. B.4.2.3 Due to the constraints of development and available land, mass transit service shall be urged to provide recreation and commuter employee access to Clearwater Beach and Sand Key. B.4.2.4 A beach trolley system is encouraged to operate in order to reduce automobile trips on Clearwater Beach. B.4.3 Objective - The City, in coordination with PSTA, shall continue to develop model designs for transit shelters and benches to be integrated into new and existing development. Policies V Q B.4.3.1 Developers shall be encouraged to incorporate model transit stops with new development where appropriate. B.4.3.2 Where appropriate, the City shall support the placement and/or improvements of the local transit service terminal in the downtown. B-12 Goals Objectives and Policies Transportation 1.4.3.4 The City shall work with the Coonb PSTA, and the MPO to identify and improv sidewalk network is most pronounced Comment [K616j: County Mobility Plan --- B.4.4 Objective - The City shall participate and cooperate with agencies and committees to promote the use of mass transit. Policies 13.4.4.1 Clearwater shall coordinate with PSTA and the MPO in the continued adoption of the Five -Year Transit Development Program to address transit needs consistent with adopted level -of -service policies and transit planning guidelines. 13.4.4.2 Clearwater will cooperate with PSTA and the MPO to improve the transit system to coincide with the improvements detailed in the year 2010 and 2015 Long.-----~ Range Mass Transit Plans. 13.4.4.3 The City shall continue to participate on the board of PSTA and by other appropriate intergovernmental coordination mechanisms to assist the Pinellas County MPO and the PSTA implementing the countywide mass transit plan. 13.4.4.4 As initiatives are proposed to be adopted by the MPO, PSTA, FDOT and/or TBARTA, the City shall support transportation/commuter alternatives where appropriate. B.4.4.5 The City will coordinate with TBARTA on locating routes and feeder lines as well as locations for park and ride lots. AIRPORT B.5 GOAL - CLEARWATER AIRPARK SHALL CONTINUE TO SERVE THE GENERAL AVIATION DEMAND OF LOCAL AIRCRAFT OWNERS AND THE BUSINESS COMMUNITY IN A MANNER COMPATIBLE WITH NEARBY RESIDENTIAL USES. B.5.1 Objective - The 2002 Airport Master Plan shall be updated by 2010 and the City shall ensure compliance with current safety standards and land use regulations. Policies B.5.1.1 The City shall explore federal, state and county funding sources to supplement City expenditures for airport improvements. B.5.1.2 Operation and expansion of activities at the airpark shall be consistent with community land use and economic development objectives, with aviation related industrial use being the preferred function for any surplus airport land. B.5.1.3 The City shall program adequate resources from facility users, enterprise funds, and grants to maintain aviation facilities. B-13 Goals_ Obiectives and Policies Transportation Goals Objectives and Policies Transportation B.7.2.1 The existing monitor wells will continue to be maintained. B.7.2.2 The Airpark shall continue to be operated with land ownership and management review retained by the City. The City shall approve all leases and planned facility improvements. B.8 GOAL - INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION SHALL ENSURE SAFE, COST-EFFECTIVE AND RESOURCE -EFFICIENT OPERATION OF THE CLEARWATER AIRPARK. B.8.1 Objective'- The airport shall continue to coordinate operational and expansion activities with all appropriate agencies and City departments. Policies B.8.1.1 The City shall carry out all day-to-day airport operations and long-term development in a manner that will minimize any detrimental effects on the environment, through compliance with the permitting requirements of all applicable permitting agencies, including the monitoring of air, noise and water quality if necessary. B.8.1.2 Any revisions to the airport development plans shall be reviewed against the City's Comprehensive Plan to ensure consistency. B.8.1.3 The City will review and update, as needed, all airport horizontal, clear and obstruction zone maps for penetration of these zones due to natural or man-made occurrences to ensure safe operating conditions. B-15 TOWN OF KENNETH CITY 2008 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES Prepared by The Gail Easley Company in conjunction with the Pinellas Planning Council ADOPTED May 14, 2008 Town of Kenneth City 2008 Comprehensive Plan Town of Kenneth City 2008 Comprehensive Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS Section and Title Page 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 2.0 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROGRAM 1 3.0 GOALS, OBJECTIVES, POLICIES, AND MAPS 1 3.1 Introduction 1 3.2 Future Land Use Element 2 3.3 Transportation Element 7 3.4 Housing Element 9 3.5 Infrastructure Element 11 3.6 Conservation Element 14 3.7 Recreation And Open Space Element 17 3.8 Intergovernmental Coordination Element 20 3.9 Capital Improvements Element 24 3.10 Public School Facilities Element 29 LU -2 Future Land Use and Transportation. Map 30 Appendices Appendix A: Letter of Exemption to Public Schools Element 32 Appendix B: Future Land Use Categories 33 Appendix C: Pinellas County Ten -Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan 35 Appendix D: Potable Water Service Areas 36 May 14, 2008 Page ii Town of Kenneth City 2008 Comprehensive Plan Town of Kenneth City Goals, Objectives, and Policies 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Town of Kenneth City conducted an evaluation and appraisal of its comprehensive plan in 2006 and 2007. A number of recommendations resulted from that evaluation process. These recommendations formed the basis for an amendment to the comprehensive plan. The amendment to the comprehensive plan presented herein is an update of the plan, addressing not only the recommendations from the evaluation process, but also reorganization of the comprehensive plan to eliminate duplications. Agency references and dates for completion of specified actions are updated and corrected. Revisions are provided to ensure consistency with the Pinellas Planning Council Countywide Plan Rules. The adopted portion of this document is Section 3.0, Goals, Objectives, and Policies, together with Map LU -2, Future Land Use and Transportation. 2.0 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROGRAM The Town of Kenneth City is following the public participation requirements described in the 1999 Comprehensive Plan. The town further ensures that all participation requirements of Florida Statutes are followed. This process began with the adoption of an Evaluation and Appraisal Report in November 2006. During this process, citizens had opportunities to review and comment on the findings during the evaluation of the comprehensive plan. This document contains a proposed amendment to the 1999 Comprehensive Plan to implement recommendations of the Evaluation and Appraisal Report. The process for considering, transmitting, and adopting the amendment includes citizen workshops and public hearings. October 24, 2007 Workshop on proposed EAR -based amendment November 27, 2007 Transmittal hearing by the Planning and Zoning Commission (LPA) December 12, 2007 Transmittal hearing by Town Council May 14, 2008 Adoption hearing by the Town Council 3.0 GOALS, OBJECTIVES, POLICIES, AND MAPS 3.1 INTRODUCTION All goals, objectives, and policies, and Map LU -2, Future Land Use and Transportation, are included in this section. These goals, objectives, policies and map comprise the Town of Kenneth City 2008 Comprehensive Plan. The supporting data and analysis are located in a separate document and include both the data and analysis from the 1999 comprehensive plan as well as the evaluation and appraisal report -based amendment prepared in 2008. May 14, 2008 Page 1 Town of Kenneth City 2008 Comprehensive Plan 3.2 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT Goal 1: The residential and commercial character of the Town of Kenneth City shall be maintained and protected while: o Maximizing the potential for economic benefit resulting from the fact that the town serves the commercial needs of a larger population, including town residents, residents of surrounding communities, and visitors; o Enhancing natural and manmade resources for use by citizens and visitors; and e Minimizing the threat to health, safety, and welfare posed by hazards, nuisances, incompatible land uses, and environmental degradation. Objective 1.1: The Town shall ensure that redevelopment and new development occur in planned areas at the appropriate densities and intensities as indicated on, and consistent with, Map LU -2: Future Land Use and Transportation and this comprehensive plan. Policy 1.1.1: Map LU -2: Future Land Use and Transportation shall be consistent with the Rules Concerning the Administration of the Countywide Future Land Use Plan, As Amended adopted by Pinellas County Ordinance No. 89-4 effective February 6, 1989, and subsequent amendments. Policy 1.1.2: The Town of Kenneth City adopts the mixed-use land use category established on the Future Land Use Map, which implements this comprehensive plan based on and consistent with the following residential density standards and intensity standards for nonresidential uses. O Residential/Office General (R/OG), with a residential density of 0 to 15 units per acre in which the developmental threshold as a mix shall be a minimum parcel of 7,500 square feet, at a minimum of thirty percent (30%) residential, with a maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of 0.4 and a maximum Impervious Surface Ratio (ISR) of 0.65. Policy 1.1.3: The Town of Kenneth City adopts the residential land use categories established on the Future Land Use Map, which implement this comprehensive plan based on and consistent with the following residential density categories. o Residential Low (RL), density of 0 to 5 residential units per acre o Residential Urban (RU), density of 0 to 7.5 residential units per acre 0 Residential Medium (RM), density of 0 to 15 residential units per acre Policy 1.1.4: The Town of Kenneth City adopts the nonresidential and nonmixed use land use categories established on the Future Land Use Map. May 14, 2008 Page 2 Town of Kenneth City 2008 Comprehensive Plan • Commercial General (CG), with a maximum FAR of 0.4 and a maximum ISR of 0.8 • Industrial Limited - Warehouse (IL), with a maximum FAR of 0.5 and a maximum ISR of 0.65 • Recreation/Open Space (R/OS), with a maximum FAR of 0.25 and a maximum ISR of 0.4 • Preservation (P), with a maximum FAR of 0.1 and a maximum ISR of 0.2 • Institutional (1), with a maximum FAR of 0.5 and a maximum ISR of 0.65 • Water/Drainage Feature (FAR and ISR are not applicable to this category) Policy 1.1.5: All land use categories on the Future Land Use Map shall be consistent with the locational characteristics adopted in the Pinellas Planning Council Countywide Plan Rules. Policy 1.1.6: Any amendment to the Future Land Use Map that allows additional residential density or nonresidential intensity, either by a requested map amendment or the annexation of vacant residential lands, will require a re-evaluation of the infrastructure, transportation, recreational facilities, and any capital improvements needed to meet the adopted level -of - service standards. Objective 1.2: Future growth and development shall be managed through the implementation and enforcement of land development regulations, as established in the Town of Kenneth City Land Development Code and consistent with this adopted comprehensive plan. Policy 1.2.1: The land development regulations shall provide guidelines for the administration of the land use categories adopted by the Town of Kenneth City. Policy 1.2.2: Zoning districts defining specific uses and development densities and intensities shall implement the adopted land use designations. Policy 1.2.3: Guidelines for the subdivision and use of land, the protection of environmentally sensitive resources, landscaping, and flood hazard safety shall continue to be implemented. Policy 1.2.4: New developments and redevelopments shall limit disruption to the community, and minimize the displacement of residents. May 14, 2008 Page 3 Town of Kenneth City 2008 Comprehensive Plan Policy 1.2.5: Open space buffering, as appropriate, shall be required between the following: o Residential and non-residential land uses; e Educational or recreational development and other land uses; e Land uses with different densities or intensities; o Land uses and rights-of-way; and 0 Other incompatible or nonconforming land uses. Objective 1.3: Integrity and quality of life will be maintained in existing and future residential neighborhoods. Policy 1.3.1: Ensure that existing residential areas are protected from the encroachment of incompatible activities, and other land use areas shall be protected from the encroachment of incompatible residential activities. Policy 1.3.2: Ensure that future residential areas are located and designed to protect life and property from natural and manmade hazards such as flooding, excessive traffic, subsidence, noxious odors, and noise. Policy 1.3.3: Residential land uses shall be located in a manner that is compatible with the type and scale of surrounding land uses. Policy 1.3.4: The Town will use the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council Hurricane Evacuation Study for guidance pertaining to residential future land use densities in hurricane evacuation areas: Objective 1.4: Commercial development shall be compatible with environmental and economic resources, shall occur in a planned fashion, shall be consistent with Map LU -2: Future Land Use and Transportation, and the town's land development regulations, and shall be in keeping with the needs and character of the community. Policy 1.4.1: Commercial development shall be of a nature which is intended to serve the general retail needs, day-to-day commercial needs (e.g., convenience goods and services), and personal and professional service needs of the residents of the Town of Kenneth City and the residents and seasonal visitors of nearby communities and unincorporated Pinellas County. Policy 1.4.2: The Town shall work with Pinellas County to ensure that commercial/office development taking place along 54th Avenue and 66th Street, either in the town or county, is of a nature compatible with surrounding land uses and available public services and utilities. May 14, 2008 Page 4 Town of Kenneth City 2008 Comprehensive Plan Policy 1.4.3: The Town shall support the best use of the Commercial General and Residential/Office General land use categories through the redevelopment or rehabilitation of existing commercial or office uses. Policy 1.4.4: The Town shall ensure that commercial areas are located and designed to enhance safety, to provide for compatibility with existing uses, to provide adequate off-street parking and loading areas and to separate pedestrian and vehicular traffic. Policy 1.4.5: Access management provisions shall minimize traffic and land use conflicts, such as limiting direct access onto major roads by controlling the number and location of curb cuts. Objective 1.5: The Town shall provide for the use of innovative land development techniques, such as planned unit developments and mixed-use land categories. Policy 1.5.1: Planned unit developments shall, at a minimum, include creative development approaches, mixed-use development, required open space, safe and efficient traffic circulation, and cluster development. Policy 1.5.2: Provide that the Residential/Office General land use category shall be used for mixed-use purposes through policies contained in this comprehensive plan. Objective 1.6: Existing land uses or structures which are either incompatible or inconsistent with the desired town character, as established in Map LU -2: Future Land Use and Transportation, shall be deemed nonconforming. Policy 1.6.1: Those uses and structures that lawfully existed prior to the adoption of the town's comprehensive plan in September 13, 1989, and have been rendered nonconforming shall be considered grandfathered, as defined in the land development regulations. Objective 1.7: The Town shall continue to ensure the availability of suitable land for utility facilities necessary to support proposed development. Policy 1.7.1: The Town, through its site plan review and permitting procedures, will cooperate with those public utilities providing service to the community to assure that adequate land is available for those facilities necessary to support proposed development. May 14, 2008 Page 5 Town of Kenneth City 2008 Comprehensive Plan Policy 1.7.2: Consistent with state law, new electric substations shall be permissible in all land use categories, except Preservation and Conservation, in the town. Objective 1.8: The Town shall assist property owners in the identification, preservation, and protection of any structures that may become historically or architecturally significant. Policy 1.8.1:. By providing referral to the appropriate governmental agency(ies), the Town shall assist property owners in the identification of historically or architecturally significant structures. Policy 1.8.2: The Town shall assist property owners of historically or architecturally significant structures in applying for and utilizing state and federal assistance programs. Objective 1.9: The Town of Kenneth City shall support efforts that facilitate coordination of planning between the Town ,and the Pinellas County School Board for the location and development of public educational facilities. Policy 1.9.1: The Town of Kenneth City supports public school siting pursuant to the requirements of state law through the passage of Resolution 99-3, dated April 14, 1999. Policy 1.9.2: Public educational facilities of the Pinellas County School Board are an allowable use within the following future land use categories: o Residential Low o Residential Medium e Commercial General o Institutional Objective 1.10: The Town shall recognize private property rights pursuant to Sections 70.001 and 70.51, Florida Statutes. Policy 1.10.1: The Town shall, upon need, prepare and adopt procedures to deal with the appeal process as outlined in the Bert J. Harris, Jr. Private Property Rights Protection Act and the Environmental Dispute Resolution Act. May 14, 2008 Page 6 Town of Kenneth City 2008 Comprehensive Plan 3.3 _ TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT Goal 1: A safe, convenient, and efficient road system shall be available for all residents and visitors to the town. Objective 1.1: The epefa4ienal level of-ser-viee (LOS) "D" peak heiff shall be the slandafd 1bf all fftefial and eefleeter feads within !he ievffir Maintain a multi -modal transportation system that increases mobility for bicyclists, pedestrians and transit users as well as motorists, and that promotes development patterns that reduce vehicle miles traveled and greenhouse gas emissions. The Town shall implement a mobility management system through the application of Transportation Element policies and the site plan review process. Policies pertaining to the application of the Mobilitygement System are listed below. a. All development projects generating new trips shall be subject to payment of a multi- modal impact fee. b. Development projects that generate between 51 and 300 new peak hour trips on deficient roads shall be classified as tier 1 and required to submit a transportation management plan (TMP) designed to address their impacts while increasing mobility and reducing the demand for single occupant vehicle travel. c. Development projects that generate more than 300 new peak hour trips on deficient roads shall be classified as tier 2, required to conduct a traffic study, and submit an accompanying report and TMP based on the report findings. d. Multi -modal impact fee assessments may be qpplied as credit toward the cost of a TMP. e. A traffic study and/or TMP for a development project not impacting a deficient road corridor shall be required if necessary to address the impact of additional trips generated by the project on the surrounding traffic circulation system. f. Deficient roads shall include those operating at peak hour level of service (LOS) and F and/or volume -to -capacity (v/c) ratio 0.9 or greater without a mitigating improvement scheduled for construction within three years. g. Multi -modal impact fee revenue shall be utilized to fund multi -modal improvements to local county or state facilities that are consistent with the comprehensive plan as May 14, 2008 Page 7 Town of Kenneth City 2008 Comprehensive Plan well as the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Long Range Transportation Plan. h. The Town shall support the effort of the MPO to complete the biennial update of the Multi -modal Impact Fee Ordinance through the MPO planning_ process, which includes review by the MPO Technical Coordinating Committee and MPO Policy Board. Policy 1.1.32• The Town shall monitor the Metropolitan Planning Organization's annual traffic analysis for roads with.projected level -of -service problems within its jurisdiction. Objective 1.2: Transportation planning shall be coordinated with . Map LU -2: Future Land Use and Transportation, and roadway rights-of-way shall be identified, protected, reserved, or acquired. as needed. Policy 1.2.1: The Town shall enforce the minimum construction and regulatory requirements for new and existing roadways. Policy 1.2.2: The Town shall continue to ensure that existing densities and intensities of parcels along roadways with existing and/or projected level -of -service deficiencies are maintained or decreased. May 14, 2008 Page 8 Town of Kenneth City 2008 Comprehensive Plan Objective 1.3: The Town shall encourage the development and utilization of a safe, convenient, and energy efficient multi -modal transportation system, supporting motorized and non -motorized transportation, and meeting the special needs of the transportation disadvantaged. Policy 1.3.1: The Town shall continue to enforce parking requirements. Policy 1.3.2: When physically possible, the Town shall promote the use of bicycle and pedestrian ways that connect residential areas to recreation areas, schools, shopping areas, and transit terminal areas. Policy 1.3.3: Bicycle storage areas at shopping and recreational areas shall be required. Policy 1.3.4: The Town shall encourage county and state transportation authorities to provide sidewalks, crosswalks, and bicycle lanes on roadways within their jurisdictions. Policy 1.3.5: The Town shall support and coordinate public transportation services within the town with the Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority, as feasible. Policy 1.3.6: The Town shall coordinate with the Pinellas County Metropolitan Planning Organization regarding the provision of transportation disadvantaged services, as needed. Objective 1.4: The town transportation system shall emphasize safety and aesthetics. Policy 1.4.1: The Town shall enforce signage requirements along roadways within its jurisdiction. Policy 1.4.2: The Town shall review annual accident reports prepared by the Town's Police Department for county and state roadways under their jurisdiction to identify needed safety improvements. Policy 1.4.3: The Town, in cooperation with Pinellas County and the Florida Department of Transportation, shall control connections or access points of driveways to the roadway system. Objective 1.5: Transportation planning shall be coordinated with the town's Future Land Use Element, the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Long Range and 5 -Year Transportation Plans, the May 14, 2008 Page 9 Town of Kenneth 2008 Comprehensive Plan Pinellas County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Long -Range Transportation Plan, and the plans of neighboring jurisdictions. Policy 1.5.1: The Town shall consider adopting future land use amendments in order to be consistent with subsequent versions of the FDOT and the Pinellas County MPO Transportation Improvement Program and Long -Range Transportation Plan. Policy 1.5.2: The Town shall periodically review the transportation plans and programs of neighboring municipalities and Pinellas County, as they may be amended, for consistency with this element. Policy 1.5.3: All amendments to this transportation element shall be supported by appropriate transportation analysis. 3.4 HOUSING ELEMENT Goal 1: The Town shall encourage the provision of decent, safe, and sanitary housing in suitable neighborhoods at affordable costs to meet the needs of present and future residents, free from arbitrary discrimination because of race, sex, handicap, ethnic background, age, marital status, or householdcomposition. Objective 1.1: The Town shall encourage the private sector to provide and preserve adequate and affordable housing to meet the needs of the existing and future population. Policy 1.1.1: The Town shall provide information and technical assistance to the private sector for the development or redevelopment of additional housing units. Policy 1.1.2: The Town shall periodically review and update ordinances, codes, regulations, and the permitting process to streamline the private sector's ability to meet housing needs. Policy 1.1.3: The Town shall provide guidelines for the conservation, rehabilitation, and demolition of housing units to ensure the health, welfare, and safety of residents. Policy 1.1.4: The Town shall provide supportive infrastructure and facilities to residents in all areas of the town. Policy 1.1.5: The Town shall uphold the cooperation agreement with Pinellas County for the administration of the Community Development Block Grant program, and shall consider May 14, 2008 Page 10 Town of Kenneth City 2008 Comprehensive Plan the use of other appropriate federal, state, and local subsidy programs to create affordable housing. Policy 1.1.6: The Town shall coordinate with Pinellas County in the delivery of a multi jurisdictional program to address affordable housing. Objective 1.2: The Town shall encourage the private sector to provide a mixture of affordable housing units, including extremely low, very -low, low, and moderate -income housing, and manufactured homes. Policy 1.2.1: The Town shall permit a variety of residential densities and housing types, to allow the private sector to meet the housing needs of extremely low, very -low, low, and moderate - income households. Policy 1.2.2: The Town shall insure that any future affordable housing developed within the town shall be designed to avoid a concentration of units in any one geographic area. Objective 1.3: The Town shall protect the rights of all citizens to purchase or rent decent, safe, and sanitary housing, free from arbitrary discrimination because of race, sex, handicap, ethnic background, age, marital status, or household composition. Policy 1.3.1: The Town shall enforce the Pinellas County Fair Housing Ordinance. Policy 1.3.2: The Town shall notify enforcement agencies whenever housing discrimination is encountered. Policy 1.3.3: The Town shall have a multifamily land use category to encourage the private sector to provide a wide range of housing types and costs. Objective 1.4: Community residential homes licensed by the Florida Department of Children and Families shall be permitted in residential neighborhoods, pursuant to Chapter 419, Florida Statutes. Policy 1.4.1: Licensed community residential homes with six or fewer residents shall be allowed in any future land use map category that allows single-family homes, pursuant to state law. Policy 1.4.2: Licensed community residential homes with seven or more residents shall meet local siting requirements. May 14, 2008 Page 11 Town of Kenneth City 2008 Comprehensive Plan Objective 1.5: The useful life of the existing housing stock shall be conserved and extended, the character of existing residential neighborhoods shall be maintained or improved, and substandard housing shall continue to be eliminated. Policy 1.5.1: The Town shall enforce the housing codes and standards relating to care and maintenance of residential and neighborhood environments and facilities, to preserve the existing residential character, protect the quality of the housing stock, and ensure public health and safety. Policy 1.5.2: The Town shall encourage individual homeowners to increase private reinvestment in housing, by providing information and technical assistance programs. Policy 1.5.3: The Town shall maintain code enforcement activities, through regular inspections of the housing stock. Objective 1.6: The Town shall provide uniform and equitable treatment for persons and businesses displaced by local government programs. Policy 1.6.1: The Town shall follow state and federal guidelines to ensure that any persons displaced by public action shall have access to reasonably located, standard housing at affordable costs prior to their displacement. 3.5 INERASTRUCTU-RE ELEMENT Goal l: The Town shall ensure that needed sanitary sewer, solid waste, and potable water services will be provided by a safe and efficient system which maintains adequate facilities and provides for orderly growth and expansion. Objective 1.1: The Town of Kenneth City shall continue to implement procedures, in cooperation with its sewage, solid waste, and potable water system providers, to ensure that development permits are issued only when adequate facility capacity is available to serve the development and do not result in a reduction in the level -of -service standards adopted within this element. May 14, 2008 Page 12 Town of Kenneth City 2008 Comprehensive Plan Policy 1.1.1: The adopted level -of -service standards shall be as follows: Table 1: Adopted Level -of -Service Standards Facility Time Period Level -of -Service Standard Beginning of planning time 120 gallons per capita a day' Potable Water frame through 2019 2020-2025 115 gallons per capita a day To determine whether adequate wastewater treatment capacity is available for a development or redevelopment project in Sanitary Sewer To extend through 2025 the Town, Kenneth City will utilize the adopted level of service standard for the South Cross Bayou Wastewater Reclamation Facility.' Solid Waste To extend through 2025 7.1 pounds per capita a day (excludes recycled materials) Source: 'Pinellas County Planning Department, Exhibit B, Capital Improvements Element, October 16, 2007 and adopted March 18, 2008. Policy 1.1.2: The Town shall ensure that the development, expansion, replacement, or modification of infrastructure facilities is compatible with adopted level -of -service standards. Policy 1.1.3: The Town shall maintain formal agreements with Pinellas County to provide water and sewer services consistent with adopted level -of -service standards. Policy 1.1.4: When the Southwest Florida Water Management District updates its regional water supply plan, the Town will incorporate the appropriate updates into this comprehensive plan within 18 months. Objective 1.2: The Town and Pinellas County shall work together to encourage reduction in potable water demand. Policy 1.2.1: The Town shall require that low water usage plumbing fixtures be installed in all new buildings or in conjunction with renovations. Policy 1.2.2: The Town shall enforce the water conservation provisions of the Pinellas County Code and shall coordinate with Southwest Florida Water Management District to restrict the unnecessary consumption of potable water. May 14, 2008 Page 13 Town of Kenneth City 2008 Comprehensive Plan Policy 1.2.3: The Town shall require the installation of rain sensor devices for new irrigation systems which will override the timing cycle when adequate rainfall has occurred. Objective 1.3: The Town shall work with Pinellas County to reduce the demand for potable water through reuse of wastewater. Policy 1.3.1: The Town shall examine the feasibility of reusing treated wastewater for irrigation and landscaping. Objective 1.4: The Town shall work with its franchise solid waste collection provider and Pinellas County to maintain or reduce its per capita generation of non -recyclable solid waste. Policy 1.4.1: The Town shall provide a recycling program for appropriate waste products. Goal 2: The Town shall provide an efficient stormwater drainage system which protects human life, minimizes property damage, and improves stormwater quality and on-site retention. Objective 2.1: The Town shall continue to implement its master drainage plan. . Policy 2.1.1: The drainage level -of -service standard shall be the design requirements of the 25 -year frequency, 24-hour storm event or the highest feasible design requirements. Policy 2.1.2: The master drainage plan shall continue to address the following: e An inventory and evaluation of those areas which currently have flooding problems; o A hydrological map of Kenneth City showing natural and artificial drainage features; e A map of stormwater outfalls into lakes and retention ponds; and o A plan for correcting drainage deficiencies, including a prioritized list of corrective measures, and their projected implementation costs. Policy 2.1.3: Drainage regulations and standards shall meet all applicable federal, state, regional, and local standards. Policy 2.1.4: The Town shall maintain drainage facilities adjacent to roadways in its jurisdiction, and where necessary, shall consider the use of eminent domain condemnation to acquire property for drainage retention purposes. May 14, 2008 Page 14 Town of Kenneth City 2008 Comprehensive Plan Policy 2.1.5: The Town shall prevent iei3 of erosion; and excessive runoff, and protect natural drainage features through the site plan review and development process. Policy 2.1.6: The Town shall support the efforts of Pinellas County to improve the portions of the Joe's Creek drainage basin that fall within county jurisdiction. 3.6 CONSERVATION ELEMENT Goal 1: To ensure the highest environmental quality possible, the Town of Kenneth City shall conserve, protect, and appropriately manage its aquatic, wetland, and terrestrial resources. Objective 1.1: The Town shall continue to participate in the conservation of regional groundwater resources. Policy 1.1.1: The Town shall continue implementing its educational program encouraging residential and commercial consumers to conserve potable water. Policy 1.1.2: The Town shall continue to enforce the provisions set forth in the Southwest Florida Water Management District Water Shortage Plan. Policy 1.1.3: The Town shall protect the water storage and water quality enhancement functions of floodplain areas and the application of land and water management practices which provide for compatible uses. Objective 1.2: To maintain surface water quality and reduce flood damage, the Town shall protect the natural functions of floodplains, lakes, and the creek. Policy 1.2.1: Recognizing that parts of the community are located within the 100 -year floodplain, the Town shall strictly enforce all appropriate federal, state, and regional construction codes. Policy 1.2.2: The Town shall review and amend as necessary the current floodplain ordinance to ensure that hydrologically significant wetlands and other natural floodplain features are adequately protected. Objective 1.3: The Town shall conserve or improve any identified wetlands or wildlife habitat. May 14, 2008 Page 15 Town of Kenneth City 2008 Comprehensive Plan Policy 1.3.1: Upon identification in the town, areas such as marshes, swamps, or other wetlands shall be designated Preservation land on Map L U-24: Future Land Use and Transportation. Policy 1.3.2: The Town shall work with appropriate county, regional, and state agencies to identify, protect, and conserve the natural character and function of any identified wildlife habitat. Objective 1.4: The Town shall conserve, appropriately use, and protect trees and native vegetation. Policy 1.4.1: The Town shall encourage all new development to preserve, to the maximum extent practicable, trees and other native vegetation found on site. Policy 1.4.2: Native vegetation shall receive priority in the landscaping requirements. Policy 1.4.3: The Town shall prohibit the planting and encourage the removal of exotic species such as punk tree (Melaleuca quinquenervia), Australian pine (Casuarina spp.) and Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolus). Policy 1.4.4: The Town shall consider soil conditions and vegetation classifications when designating land use categories. Policy 1.4.5: Although only limited natural resources remain in Kenneth City, every effort shall be taken to protect these resources, including the following measures: e Recreational development shall be compatible with the surrounding environment, and shall be subject to performance standards adopted in land development regulations; e The clearing of trees and wetland vegetation shall be prohibited, unless a permit has been obtained; and o All applications for development approval shall be subject to site plan review. Policy 1.4.6: The Town shall participate in county, regional, and state programs designed to protect unique vegetative communities located in more than one local jurisdiction. Objective 1.5: All development activities shall be coordinated with topography and soil conditions, and shall ensure the protection of natural resources. Policy 1.5.1: Unique and irreplaceable natural resources are protected from the adverse effects of development, except in cases of overriding public benefit. May 14, 2008 Page 16 Town of Kenneth City 2008 Comprehensive Plan Policy 1.5.2: The suitability of topography and soil conditions shall be assessed as part of the development review process. Policy 1.5.3: All development shall be compatible with the surrounding environment and shall be subject to performance standards. Policy 1.5.4: Land use proposals which could potentially increase point -source air and water pollution shall be subject to a strict permitting process that conforms to all county, state, and federal regulations governing point -source discharges. Objective 1.6: The Town shall protect species with special status from adverse impacts of urban development. Policy 1.6.1: The Town shall comply with all state and federal regulations pertaining to species of special status (e.g., endangered, rare, species of special concern, and threatened) as required under the Florida Endangered and Threatened Species Act or the federal Endangered Species Act. Objective 1.7: The Town of Kenneth City shall continue its involvement in monitoring the proper handling, treatment, and disposal of hazardous waste within its jurisdiction. Policy 1.7.1: The Town shall follow the Pinellas County emergency response plan governing accidents involving hazardous waste. Policy 1.7.2: The Town shall support the Pinellas County pollution prevention program governing small generators of hazardous wastes. Policy 1.7.3: Through mailings and other media, the Town shall encourage residents and local businesses to deposit household chemical waste at the Pinellas County household chemical collection center. Objective 1.8: The Town shall continue efforts to comply with all state and federal standards for air quality. Policy 1.8.1: In order to reduce the negative effects of automobile emissions pollution, the Town shall: • Encourage vegetative buffer strips between roadways and residential development; • Promote alternative transportation modes such as ride -sharing, walking, and biking; and • Assure continued operation of roadways at acceptable levels of service. May 14, 2008 Page 17 Town of Kenneth C 2008 Comprehensive Plan Policy 1.8.2: The Town shall encourage the use of energy conservation methods in new developments and redevelopments. Objective 1.9: Land use planning shall be coordinated with hazard mitigation efforts, consistent with recommendations of the Pinellas County Local Mitigation Strategy. Policy 1.9.1: Land development regulations governing development or redevelopment in flood prone areas shall be implemented based on the criteria of the National Flood Insurance Program. Policy 1.9.2: Appropriate recommendations of interagency hazard mitigation reports, such as the Pinellas County Local Mitigation Strategy, shall be incorporated into this comprehensive plan. Policy 1.9.3: The Town will forward notice of proposed future land use plan amendments with potential hurricane shelter and evacuation route impacts to the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council and the Pinellas County Emergency Management Department which will be consulted, if necessary and appropriate, to ascertain the amount of currently available shelter space. 3.7 RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT Goal l: The Town shall ensure the provision, protection, and maintenance of a coordinated, efficient, and accessible system of public and private recreational parks and facilities which shall meet the needs of the town's current and future residents, tourists, and visitors. Objective 1.1: The Town shall, in cooperation with other governmental agencies, provide and maintain a system of parks, recreation facilities, and open space, meeting the needs of the current and future population. Policy 1.1.1: The standards shown in Tables 1 and 2 are the adopted level -of -service standards for the town. May 14, 2008 Page 18 Town of Kenneth 2008 Comprehensive Plan Table 1: Level -of -Service Standards for Parks and Open Space Park Facility Service Area/ Facilities 1 court per 6,000 Population Served 1 field per 6,000 Mini -Park 2 - 3 block area per 2,500 Play apparatus areas, benches, open 1 recreation center per 6,000 Shuffleboard space, landscaping, and picnic tables. Tennis 1 court per 6,000 Play apparatus areas, recreation buildings, Neighborhood 0.25 - 0.5 miles per 5,000 sports fields, multi-purpose fields, senior Park citizen areas, landscaping, open space, and free play areas. Open Space 1 acre per 1,000 Passive recreation area, trails, and commemorative structures. Table 2: Level -of -Service Standards for Specific Activities Activity/Facility Per Person Level -of -Service Standard Basketball 1 court per 6,000 Multi -Purpose 1 field per 6,000 General Play 1 playground per 3,000 Indoor Activities 1 recreation center per 6,000 Shuffleboard 1 court per 2,000 Tennis 1 court per 6,000 Policy 1.1.2: Park and recreation lands shall be planned for multiple uses and located in areas most suitable to satisfy the needs of the permanent and seasonal population, and tourists. Policy 1.1.3: Land set aside by new development for recreational purposes shall be determined suitable for that purpose during the site planning process, and should not be land which is remaining after development. Policy LII: The designation and acquisition of recreation and park sites shall be in accordance with long-range comprehensive plans for town development and redevelopment. Policy 1.1.5: The Town shall ensure that recreation sites be held inviolate against diversion to other uses, except in instances of overriding public need. Objective 1.2: The Town shall encourage the coordination of public and private recreation resources. May 14, 2008 Page 19 Town of Kenneth 2008 Comprehensive Plan Policy 1.2.1: The Town shall encourage local businesses and organizations to participate in community events, corridor beautification, and other recreation/open space projects. Policy 1.2.2: The Town shall encourage individuals to donate monies, gifts, or properties toward park restoration and improvements. Objective 1.3: Lands designated as Recreation/Open Space or Preservation on Map L U-2: Future Land Use and Transportation shall be protected from incompatible land uses. Policy 1.3.1: The Town shall maintain and enforce standards for open space, landscaping, and signage. Policy 1.3.2: The Town shall maintain passive open space in its parks, in order to preserve native habitats and recreational opportunities. Policy 1.3.3: The Town shall work with Pinellas County to preserve open space in the Joe's Creek corridor. Objective 1.4: The Town shall provide park and recreation facilities in an economically efficient manner. Policy 1.4.1: The Town shall actively pursue funding for the maintenance of park and recreation facilities, including county, state, and federal assistance funds. Policy 1.4.2: New residential developments or redevelopments shall provide for the future recreational needs generated by that development. Policy 1.4.3: The Town shall preserve, maintain, and enhance existing parks and recreation facilities through the use of adequate operating budgets, user fees, and proper management techniques. Policy 1.4.4: The Town shall include funds for the maintenance of recreation sites in its annual operating budget. Policy 1.4.5:. The Town shall explore entering into a formal agreement with the Pinellas County School Board for the use of countywide public school recreational facilities, as needed to meet recreational needs. May 14, 2008 Page 20 Town of Kenneth City 2008 Comprehensive Plan Objective 1.5: The Town shall ensure adequate access to public recreation sites, including aquatic resources, for all residents and seasonal visitors. Policy 1.5.1: The Town shall ensure that public recreational facilities maintain access for all age groups and the physically disabled. Policy 1.5.2: The Town shall ensure that public recreational facilities maintain adequate parking, and access for bicyclists and pedestrians. 3.8 INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT Goal 1: The Town shall participate in, and comply with, established provisions for intergovernmental coordination to implement the comprehensive plan consistent with state, regional, and countywide procedures and requirements. Objective 1.1: The Town of Kenneth City shall participate in the countywide planning process as provided for in the Special Act (Ch. 88-464, Laws of Florida, as amended) through its representation on the Pinellas Planning Council. Policy 1.1.1: The Town of Kenneth City shall coordinate its comprehensive plan and land development regulations with the Countywide Future Land Use Plan and Countywide Plan Rules. Policy 1.1.3: The Town shall comply with the specific procedural and substantive requirements of the Countywide Plan Rules concerning amendment of the comprehensive plan, Future Land Use Map, and land development regulations. Policy 1.1.4: A representative appointed by the Mayor may participate as a non-voting member of the Planners Advisory Committee of the PPC. Objective 1.2: Bring intergovernmental disputes to closure in a timely manner through the use of voluntary dispute resolution processes. Policy 1.2.1: The Town will pursue the resolution of conflicts that may arise from local comprehensive plan goals, objectives, and policies using the appropriate voluntary dispute resolution process identified in this element or other suitable process. May 14, 2008 Page 21 Town of Kenneth City 2008 Comprehensive Plan Policy 1.2.2: The Town will utilize the existing countywide planning process, as appropriate, to resolve local government future land use plan disputes, as well as other planning related intergovernmental disputes. Policy 1.2.3: The Town will utilize the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council in its role as a mediator and conciliator to reconcile differences on planning and growth management issues. Policy 1.2.4: In instances where the resolution of issues requiring intergovernmental concurrence has not been achieved, the Town may initiate informal mediation by filing with the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council a written request for mediation assistance, pursuant to Chapter 29H-13, Florida Administrative Code, and Chapter 186, Florida Statutes. Objective 1.3: Identify, implement, and coordinate joint planning areas for annexation and service provision. Policy 1.3.1: In order to ensure that growth resulting from future annexation does not have an adverse effect on the character of the community, sound urban development, adequate accommodation of growth, or the availability of community services, the Town shall ensure that annexations are conducted pursuant to the applicable provision_ s of the Town Charter. and Chapter 171, Florida Statutes. Policy 1.3.2: The Town may annex unincorporated enclaves in order to promote efficient provision of services. Policy 1.3.3: The Town will coordinate with the Pinellas Planning Council, and other jurisdictions as appropriate, to establish a more comprehensive and better integrated annexation process that will include consideration of the following: e Advance notice - A procedure that provides for advance notice of all annexations to the respective parties of interest. e Accurate legal description - A means to review and validate the legal descriptions for annexations. o State law compliance - Definitions and examples by which to determine compliance with the state law for contiguity, compactness, enclaves, and procedures for annexation- agreements. e Ability to serve - Pre -determined or administrative means to establish a municipality's ability to serve the area. o Service contracts - Enabling provisions for the County and each municipality to enter into mutually acceptable agreements to provide selected services where it is beneficial to the citizenry and cost-effective to do so in lieu of annexation. e Predictability - The delineation of areas eligible to be annexed by each jurisdiction. May 14, 2008 Page 22 Town of Kenneth 2008 Comprehensive Plan • Consistency - A requirement for consistency with the Countywide Future Land Use Plan at the time of annexation. • Coordination with state plan amendment review process - To establish eligibility for waiver of the requirement for plan amendment pursuant to Section 163.3171(3), Florida Statutes, at the time of annexation. Policy 1.3.4: The Town will provide a copy of its published or posted notice of annexation, via certified mail, to the Board of County Commissioners as required by Section 171.044(6), Florida Statutes. Goal 2: The Town shall establish a regular means of communication among officials of two or more political or other jurisdictions for the purpose of addressing and resolving issues of mutual interest that arise from the local government's comprehensive plan and plans of other entities. Objective 2.1: The Town shall continue to improve communication, cooperation, and coordination with area local governments, agencies, and districts. Policy 2.1.1: The Town of Kenneth City will, through site plan review, strive to ensure that development and/or redevelopment in the town will not negatively impact the cities of St. Petersburg and Pinellas Park or unincorporated Pinellas County. Policy 2.1.2: Recognizing the impacts of development extend beyond the limits of the community, the Town shall, through site plan review and permitting, ensure that development orders or permits are consistent with the objectives of the Southwest Florida Water Management District, the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council, state, or federal agencies. Policy 2.1.3 The Town will coordinate with service providers in the town to develop recommendations that address ways to improve coordination of the town's concurrency management methodologies and systems, and levels of service. Policy 2.1.4: The Town of Kenneth City shall continue to coordinate with the Pinellas County Planning Council, Pinellas County School Board, Pinellas County, Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council, Tampa Bay Water, Southwest Florida Water Management District, and other state and federal agencies on projects that fall within their jurisdictions or are multi - jurisdictional in nature. Policy 2.1.5: The Town will review the plans and independent special district facility reports of Pinellas County, the Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD), and Tampa Bay Water (TBW) and identify and resolve conflicts with the comprehensive plan, including concurrency related items. May 14, 2008 Page 23 Town of Kenneth City 2008 Comprehensive Plan Objective 2.2 : Identify and describe joint processes for collaborative planning on population projections, school siting, facilities subject to concurrency, and facilities with countywide significance. Policy 2.2.1: The Town will coordinate with the Pinellas County Planning Department in its effort to develop countywide population projections that include expected growth for the community. Policy 2.2.2: The Town will continue to coordinate with Pinellas County for the provision of countywide facilities, including but not limited to, solid waste disposal, wastewater treatment, and the Pinellas County Emergency Operations Center. Policy 2.2.3: The Town will coordinate, through the Metropolitan Planning Organization, its transportation needs with those of the remainder of the county and the Florida Department of Transportation. Policy 2.2.4: The Town will coordinate with the Southwest Florida Water Management District Regional Water Supply Plan through the Pinellas County Utilities from which it receives all retail water supplies. Objective 2.3: The Town shall review its comprehensive plan to: e Identify and coordinate issues that are of mutual interest to other local, state, and regional entities; o Address through coordination mechanisms, the impacts of development on other entities; and o Coordinate compatible level -of -service standards for public facilities with any state, regional, or local entity having operational and maintenance responsibilities for such facilities. Policy 2.3.1: When reviewing proposals for development, the Town shall coordinate such development with plans of adjacent local governments. Policy 2.3.2: If requested to do so, the Town will forward its standards for incompatible land uses to adjacent jurisdictions and the School Board to solicit comments pertaining to proposed actions. Policy 2.3.3: The Town will utilize the countywide planning process as an additional means of notifying adjacent jurisdictions of future land use plan map amendments. May ] 4, 2008 Page 24 Town of Kenneth City 2008 Comprehensive Plan Policy 2.3.5: The Town will coordinate its plans for bicycle and pedestrian ways with the Metropolitan Planning Organization and its Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committees in order to notify and allow for comment by other local governments. Policy 2.3.6: The Town will coordinate its , and land deyel,...,. ent o „taboos- with the Metrepelita Platt ing Organizatien, the z and Pinellas County to encourage compatibility with level of sefyiee and access management standards for county- and state -maintained roadways. Policy 2.3.7: The Town shall improve coordination with Pinellas County for involvement in the design of roadway improvements and enhancement planning for projects that are conducted by the county but located within the town limits. Policy 2.3.8: The Town will review and comment, if necessary, on the plans of the Pinellas County Community Development Department regarding the provision of extremely low, very - low, low, and moderate income housing. Policy 2.3.9: The Town will review and support the various Pinellas County housing assistance programs available to the town. Policy 2.3.10: The Town will notify adjacent jurisdictions that share wetlands of its protection plans and solicit comments pertaining to any proposed action. Policy 2.3.11: The Town will share information concerning significant native vegetative communities, terrestrial, marine, estuarine, and aquatic habitats, wildlife species, and upland habitat occurring in the town with adjacent local governments, appropriate agencies, or other interested groups. Policy 2.3.12: The Town will participate in the Local Mitigation Committee to ensure that the strategies are implemented and updated. 3.9 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT Goal 1: The Town shall undertake fiscal actions necessary to provide and maintain public facilities for all residents within its jurisdiction, at the adopted levels of service. May 14, 2008 Page 25 Town of Kenneth City 2008 Comprehensive Plan Objective 1.1: Capital improvements, contained in the adopted five-year Schedule of Capital Improvements, will be provided to correct existing deficiencies, to accommodate desired future growth, and to replace worn out or obsolete facilities, and will serve to coordinate land use decisions with available or projected fiscal resources in order to maintain adopted levels of service. Policy 1.1.1: The Town shall maintain a Capital Improvements Advisory Committee whose purpose shall be to evaluate projects proposed for inclusion in the five-year Schedule of Capital Improvements. Policy 1.1.2: The Town shall develop, and thereafter update annually, a multi-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP), the first year of which shall be the Capital Budget. Policy 1.1.3: Proposed capital improvement projects shall be evaluated according to the following guidelines: O Project is needed to eliminate a proven or obvious hazard to public health and safety; o Project is needed to fulfill a legal commitment; e Project is needed to preserve, maintain, refurbish, achieve full use of, or replace existing facilities; o Project will provide a new facility or bring an existing one up to an adopted level of service; o Project will increase efficiency or use of existing facilities, prevent or reduce future improvement cost, or provide service to all residents equitably; e Project furthers policies adopted in other elements of this plan; o Project needed to serve development for which a development order was issued prior to adoption of this comprehensive plan; o Project will increase the economic base or quality of life of the residents; e Budget impact of project, both capital and operating, will be considered and the Town Council will consider financial feasibility of project; and e Project will be reviewed for consistency with plans of other agencies having responsibility for public facilities within the jurisdiction. Policy 1.1.4: The Town shall ensure the availability of public facilities, at adopted levels of service, needed to serve developments for which development permits were issued prior to the adoption of this comprehensive plan. Such facilities shall be provided in keeping with guidelines for the evaluation and ranking of capital improvements established in this element. Policy 1.1.5: It is the policy of the Town of Kenneth City to set a capital improvements cost threshold of $100,000 for projects to be included in the Capital Improvements Element of this comprehensive plan. May 14, 2008 Page 26 Town of Kenneth City 2008 Comprehensive Plan Policy 1.1.6: The following Schedule of Capital Improvements is hereby adopted. Funding for these projects is the "Penny for Pinellas" local option sales tax and grants from the Southwest Florida Water Management District. Table l: Schedule of Capital Improvements (All numbers are in thousands) Type of Project & Name Total Fiscal Year Costs / Funding Source FY 07/08 FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 Drainage Improvements System Upgrade through Pipe Replacements 1,550 600 200 250 250 250 Income Fund Summary Penny for Pinellas 1,150 400 0 250 250 250 SWFWMD Grant 400 200 200 0 0 0 Source: Town of Kenneth City, 2007. Objective 1.2: Debt Management The Town shall manage its debt in a manner to retain the integrity of its fiscal resources. Policy 1.2.1: The Town shall confine long-term borrowing to capital improvements too large to be financed from current revenues. Policy 1.2.2: The Town Council will only approve bond issues structured to be paid back within a period not to exceed the expected useful life of the capital project. Policy 1.2.3: Where possible, special assessments, revenue or other self-supporting bonds will be used instead of general obligation bonds. Policy 1.2.4: Efforts shall be made to secure grants or private funds whenever available to finance capital improvements as determined by the Town Council. Objective 1.3: Levels of Service The Town shall utilize its fiscal resources to eliminate any identified existing deficiencies and to provide needed capital improvements for future development and redevelopment, through the May 14, 2008 Page 27 Town of Kenneth City 2008 Comprehensive Plan site plan approval process, at adopted levels of service as specified in the elements of this comprehensive plan. Policy 1.3.1: The Town shall work with other governmental jurisdictions to establish a strategy to ensure that the costs of providing necessary capital facilities, at adopted levels of service, for any new development or redevelopment within the jurisdiction shall not be borne entirely by existing residents. Policy 1.3.2: The Town shall coordinate with Pinellas County, state agencies, the water management district, and other municipalities that provide public facilities within the town's jurisdiction to ensure that projects are funded in a fiscally equitable manner, apportioning the costs of growth among those who are responsible for it. Policy 1.3.3: The Town shall, when appropriate, continue to administer existing and implement future impact fees. Policy 1.3.4: The Town shall ensure that development orders and permits are issued only when required capital facilities are present or scheduled in the five-year Schedule of Capital Improvements with funding identified. This review will ensure that the town is consistent with the maintenance of the level -of -service standards for affected public facilities adopted in this comprehensive plan. Policy 1.3.5: The adopted levels of service for public facilities within the jurisdiction of the Town of Kenneth City shall be those adopted in the other elements of this plan. Objective 1.4: The Town of Kenneth City shall provide, or require provision of needed infrastructure for development and redevelopment concurrently with their impacts through the use of a concurrency management system, implementation monitoring of the comprehensive plan, and enforcement of development regulations. Policy 1.4.1: The Town of Kenneth City shall ensure that all development and redevelopment taking place within its municipal boundaries does not result in a reduction of the level -of -service requirements established and adopted in the Infrastructure, Recreation/Open Space, and Transportation elements of this comprehensive plan. Policy 1.4.2: Public facilities and services shall be located so as to maximize efficiency, minimize cost, and minimize impacts on the natural environment. May 14, 2008 Page 28 Town of Kenneth City 2008 Comprehensive Plan Policy 1.4.3: The land development regulations shall contain provisions whereby the development of residential and commercial land is timed and staged in conjunction with provision of supporting community facilities. Aiey 1.4.4�- .Policy 1.4.51 The Town of Kenneth City shall adopt and incorporate into its land development regulations a monitoring system designed to ensure continued enforcement of levels of service on facilities for which level of service standards have been adopted and provision of required public facility capacity. Policy 1.4.6: The monitoring system shall be reviewed on an annual basis together with the review of the Capital Improvements Element and shall be updated as needed. Policy 1.4.7: Developments or redevelopments requiring the use of potable water, sanitary sewer, solid waste, or drainage facilities shall receive development orders subject to: • The public facilities being in place at the time of issuance of the certificate of occupancy; or • The provision of the facilities is guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement pursuant to Section 163.3220, Florida Statutes, or an agreement or development order issued pursuant to Chapter 380, Florida Statutes, to be in place at the time of certificate of occupancy issuance. Policy 1.4.8: Developments or redevelopments requiring the use of park and recreation facilities shall receive development orders subject to: • The facilities and services are in place or under construction at the time of development order issuance; or • Dedications of land and facilities or fees in lieu are committed by the time of certificate of occupancy issuance; or • The development order is issued conditioned on the necessary facilities and services scheduled to be in place or under construction not more than one year after certificate of occupancy issuance as provided in the Schedule of Capital Improvements; or • The necessary facilities are subject to a binding agreement which requires them to be in place or under construction not more than one year after certificate of occupancy issuance; or • When the development order is issued, the facilities and services are guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement stipulating that they will be in place or under construction not more than one year after certificate of occupancy issuance. May 14, 2008 Page 29 Town of Kenneth City 2008 Comprehensive Plan Policy 1.4.9 1.4.14: The Town will contact Pinellas County Utilities prior to issuance of a building permit for development and redevelopment that increases water usage to determine if adequate potable water supplies exist to serve the projected development. 3.10 PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT Not applicable. May 14, 2008 Page 30 Ilk Fm Policy 1.4.9 1.4.14: The Town will contact Pinellas County Utilities prior to issuance of a building permit for development and redevelopment that increases water usage to determine if adequate potable water supplies exist to serve the projected development. 3.10 PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT Not applicable. May 14, 2008 Page 30 Town of Kenneth City 2008 Comprehensive Plan LU -2: Future Land Use and Transportation Map May 14, 2008 Page 31 Town of Kenneth City 2008 Comprehensive Plan Appendix A: Letter of Exemption to Public Schools Element WALI"ER POWNALL. SFRNICLU,ttl"FR 11111 S Aida Roud Lanp,, iluidr13773 (P_7M-35216 School Board of rcn<ua, County. Fbdaa Chafrpc— Carol 1 Cook vice Chairycrson Mary L. Tws Ama�t 'zna�R. C'fak' Jane Caliveci itmn s. 1,xmr Mary'L Ruse" Sq-inta,dml Dr. Clayro M. Wit— Receive i'illcll�ls 1'azll�in.�; P1NEL.ASCOLIMi' Council SCHOOLS Gordon BeardSJee General Planning Administrator Pinellas County Planning Department 6000 Cleveland Street, Suite 750 Clearwater, FL 33755 Dear W. li—dslee: This will confirm that School District staffhas reviewed the methodology and information. used to determine exemption status for the Pinellas County jurisdictions listed below, and that the School District concurs that these jurisdictions are exempt from the need for a public school facilities' element. Jurisdictional Fkemptions Belleair Belleair Beach Belleair Bluffs Belliear Shores Kenneth City Indian Rocks Beach Indian Shores South Pasadena North Redington Beach Rcdington Beach Redington Shores Treasure Island As discussed, we are in the process of confirming eligibility for Kenneth City and Redington Shores due to their residential annexations and subsequent development orders. In addition we are in the process of confirming enrollment numbers for South Pasadena's eligibility. Feel free to contact me if you need any additional information. Sincerely. Stephen Fairchild Real Property/Facilities Specialist Ce: Frank Frail, Educational Specifications Specialist Jim Miller, Diredor, Real Property Jim Robinson, School Board Attorney Tony Dzielski, Director, Transportation Marshall Touchton, Demographic Specialist Jim Underhill, Planning Specialist JintMatklen, Directs', Unitary Status .—d—R�l. N,,, May 14, 2008 Page 32 Town of Kenneth C APPENDIX B: Future Land Use Categories 2008 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Density/Intensity Allowable Uses and Locational Criteria Category Residential Low 0 to 5 units/acre Intended for residential uses up to 5 dwelling units per gross acre, not restricted by dwelling unit (RL) type; and public educational facilities per Chapter 1013, F.S. Includes electric substations. Residential Urban 0 to 7.5 units/acre Intended for residential uses up to 7.5 dwelling units per gross acre, not restricted by dwelling unit (RU) type; and public educational facilities per Chapter 1013, F.S. Residential Intended for residential uses, as defined by Florida Statute and the town's Code of Ordinances, up Medium (RM) 0 - 15 units/acre to 15 dwelling units per gross acre not restricted by dwelling unit type; and public educational facilities per Chapter 1013, F.S. Includes electric substations. Residential dwelling Intended for moderate intensity residential uses up to 15 dwelling units per net acre, office uses, Residential/Office @ 0 - 15 units/acre; and public educational facilities per Chapter 1013, F.S. Such uses are suitable in areas having a full General (R/OG) Maximum FAR = 0.40 range of urban services and a high degree of accessibility to the residents of the service area. Maximum ISR = 0.65 Includes electric substations. Intended for commercial uses of varying intensity, with varying service areas, and encompassing Commercial Maximum FAR = 0.40 retail and wholesale trade, personal and business services. Such uses are suitable in areas having a General (CG) Maximum ISR = 0.80 full range of urban services and a high degree of accessibility to the residents of the service area. Includes electric substations. Intended for light industrial purposes, except those which may be offensive by reason of emission Industrial Limited Maximum FAR = 0.50 of odor, dust, smoke, gas, or noise. Such uses are suitable in areas having a full range of urban -- Warehouse (IL) Maximum ISR = 0.65 services and a high degree of accessibility to the residents of the service area. Includes electric substations. Recreation/Open Maximum FAR = 0.25 Intended for recreational uses where the predominant activities involve developed physical facilities Space (R/OS) Maximum ISR = 0.40 whether private or public. Includes electric substations. Intended for areas considered to be vital for the maintenance and recharge of water resources, areas of unique or valuable topographic or subsurface features, and areas of significant environmental or Preservation/ Maximum FAR = 0.10 ecological importance (e.g., coastal beach soils) which should be preserved. Also intended for low Conservation Maximum ISR = 0.20 intensive preservation (e.g., wildlife preserves, fresh and saltwater wetlands, coastal dunes, etc.), conservation and recreation, uses which require the retention of an essentially natural landscape with the predominating surface cover being vegetated and permeable. May 14, 2008 Page 33 Town of Kenneth City 2008 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Category Density/Intensity Allowable Uses and Locational Criteria Intended for those areas of the town that are now used, or appropriate to be used, for public/semi- public institutional purposes; and to recognize such areas consistent with the need, character, and Institutional (I) Maximum FAR = 0.50 scale of the institutional use relative to surrounding uses, transportation facilities, and natural Maximum ISR = 0.65 resource features. Those uses appropriate to and consistent with this category include: public/private schools, hospitals, church, religious institutions, fraternal, civic organizations, municipal office/public buildings. Includes electric substations. May 14, 2008 Page 34 Town of Kenneth Citv 2008 Comprehensive Plan Appendix C Pinellas County Utilities Ter -Year Water 5u 1 Facilities Word Plan �!cli roTdLa aLssa7taQ triir3iit a �FYa7 FY06 FY09 FYic FY11 FY`12 FYiB FY14 FY76 FY.1e- FY17 '13J7F'!i`rP47:, GFt:4RitF-. 67.W 67:03 1 67DO 1 67.M I E721 1 E7M 1 E-,.00. 6:r.G0 ezaa E7 as 6,- 7TYPE TYPE F'RIC _=CT TMLE FUMNO SOURCE LCnCAMN TEN YEAR aCHEOWE OF AWROVEMENT'S MOW SWvn 7n'Thous WQ Shark. Plain Tenial FVOT F'd08 FY88 I FY010 Fd11 FM FYU F.Y14 FY15' FY18 FY17 F:ngly F,eR ?nerrr 'Mvei 01IM'Aan MM.'s Vv�r'ENxtpff2e Fund Trso;Vhx3 Senite Arta S,4CO 4A50V3,2 3,:'CD 2233 3, 2a�" +,Z�GCr Zno 2,2n •..3s �«,:x5 Fa;17''•.ty Reytarer:-rn;: '�doSa Euo'G'}:slalbns 'Lt'ater Erfxrcrr Ftmd Thsc,;,pi rx. Smi:c Ama ACC+'. 253 50'- i,ES3 835 33 ir, ::?0 53 53 Fa ly Regis r.•eer8. f ooze a.,& 7matmr,'d wr_irr Er.eryMe Rmd IhrCIVhDLA fkxxd:r Area 2,11E 3151 _ S _ Far`-t1Y Feotxrr..erP,. 1'�'atu-Tranunkwon hk 47 x..448-IrKh hate-VWn Water E,.Y!T 3x Flmd -cucWhait aextKe Arra 3,SCIS' 1,432 w'.WU f3 � O k 0 4 0 17,33;. FZZ31y ReDtacrr� e, Qt^t'L #aa^ `:n;y7asr:- 'rater E-Wrilm FL -rd Ti!rr_Lgltalt..^�xtr ke Area i6E. 1,050 15 350 15 15 is 1S 15 1S .`•,025 Fa�Hy FeevtaCer^enl tVew Factti y Cs 1a,r~-trs'?u€dirga Cli u ? hater E�r�xr FLmd t art E rtse F 7 y Ttrrc4:Vtmt. cxranl:e'Am: 17'r --.i flhmt Scrote Area ZU ga .10 1.34E 40 :'x 336 8x7 3 035 @7 3 23L. 550 3 3 ~ ��E 127E E�E3 3.:35 550 3 :35 SFO 3 333*. 3,4E3 32;r -w FacUt • WY. -r Stndir Fax t ' 1.{ -Ira E le -r!x Furd Tria4 muk Ern:t:e .Arsa C ZS EX 16.733 0 :a 0 is 0 O N%v FarRI , Rease *Ys a1 ErrAnibm'' F.rn-f iErt� -Om Fund ;-wCkc#,"rea - ROM Ca mly 46 oo 341 2OG 17 EcTO Il 0 Q Q 17 0 �o >3 Ea 7- !e'r6.°FaJ 7y Rere'3't:lexm EapartJ3z,`' Ermtr EnterOv! Fund #rrk arra-.:cuiS Crum.! 2C0 :,7W I;c G: 0. i7 0 0'. :p 0 4, ?3a FYTL 226,816 72,256 'k$,28E 3$$88 7,481 7,538 B,diE6 8,8E8 &,068 e;068 a -,L'6 244,8b2 s: 0300 RILASffi; .. C erobam, Frgedl' ErVtnt Vit 01 Fai3t1e'8da".er 4W.xei t Vt�zl�',f€slrr Mupdse 1TTzuCtnit Smize.Art a i557 M 747 643 4.14 Z70 2;a3 27O zIn 27Q E,833 Ccwrvvatl:, Edcralcni Edxa1':¢n and Cutch WSW t kINIMIXT Ea.3rrPOW cxt Wde 620 EEO i:.6 ::ES� E6cS :E'.3 6�' ?>2 £E, M 6I= E,2K FY TL. T,177 1;382 1,37E 1,28k 'd,07?5 865 813 '132' 1 8662 1 8E2 882 12;118 ,. Fr.;ls . t�riedza Ctxr�ta �rrd3ar Uce f✓..i; rfmsivz.ovea eroa.r.caslzt zus#-a`ni�zaek z io.tX r� revrzs s€.`untti^rsut.Sw�-�:'7'. ir�U i>~Ya#eswhsolaza» *nv4:ti �u eikr tY Lleaostitsn. Gerr:� itmz;:rzFrtks nztY;,'fsrirr,Clztrspa saris Ci; cr13F telr<ivxl .r t.x�' a"uit�4 r z>i:4sdi4#CBrFl.Z'iTffiiYPa@i A Y F +t•%�fa.ru asf aas° r;as t a zvT ettia s�rrc z tg 1>Ca.�k L to O&Afts fwl wf* th iml:3v Bsuraraisth, 8mia,rt, u"a3Pa, ts.4 s" 3r rtt, Voun 73urtas''. ca^ir w- riai 3as::arat KaiYwtk r.ry', tme(rt; laada3 E'�xafi, i rrrr 9i rti t zit, ti'sarir�ry ILsAr,71as�8ri�'i„ da: Pkw tlzAraS := Srdz zrri Yraaeira 7NRrr1: QniirDar N a xihi xNrktx az ai Ombal 1, M6S. 5awt¢a'.a+limx 91112 are ea kz,elp •aalaF :snit F'zt7grirttt az,.dt4t, raxar_a ai. tias.. id ow RIv, .a �1✓e'x kbrtei�iY�;FFt.ab<ert�atw?s�ix,'rr-rar-rssar�u, ua iw�i�r�au um.6lna ru�zw!a�uwa byvavw wr�ras n� �se�ir �sia�;a kt 1 ai.um r�assi mvfKY t'rta k4�ctlis rr3 5� Frezet tlnc+Rr+°rar,1 T tv' -31x3»}, k"Ht �Y! tiaiti#�rvi�7 iYik'h tras ne'tllt PytiLirly 4YLsetfiW i i^.. ffi1t5ib+irf diPeP�:"4&0 A F%tiXgy M13Pf§Id't6f01�/'. Hx9aktr:/ 6yLEitfl t4t2l:gttYFa. ' Tta aslxtirrw_t, J9 t kzit'3^� L�btitx�(a Pim lieN4 wi1ir dYlT"&wo k}'at'tw "d r»mm— hS SIL' i w w an ntwF ai»-i w t t" hV wplwa ma xag ccre.rriK]i, m'ej� je Wein. www narwaa iti& .s o- 4taiw4it. Awl, Adt'ii:!'yfia8=PkP64k.@YZ'ai3d444.i'6°ft**P03W Ii,dAirp,A w wNin, iid da-eftC4 4, iskla.; osr ,nrsam4tai0zFr4 Af.a..v€aaaai M,*o Nir*agc'34 Alion" *u, khiYrz fai ibwwl (OV w1h., 60cro3o m, raa eXae&3ariN; stiF trrakzi3rrsvmAarcroi $ifrrg3Y9/lrai t" 331WSt:.� ii:NrBxa qii.: rY3tWi iiarsxaardl 'S $czk to iu'SikFr t ihifti( 2s eNix-;:Yi.�[3: it rtw hii, nd it1(ai5 wL iH34i NW.t3r o a !r^'iil: ki,&-100v nr0 lniiirf64.w41 w vXYii' ri,*Nft. ilYtiti Nl9MAv rt,� kM'd,p„,7 ffmid,66 Dirt irrMY.tltl rL tat l0. aLz.i GDstetj i8bkrsr at`CEd;t4fyCerraU,SiASadrk ippeie:+arF Yss491iw srs>E .xbz. anrrL4L3nP, .. rcuctxuect&.urs.,:uaaenz��narrnuru,a... Source: http://www.pinellascounty.org/Plan/pdf files/WSFWP.pdf May 14, 2008 Page 35 Town of Kenneth City 2008 Comprehensive Plan Appendix D May 14, 2008 Page 36 Mobility Management System Deficient Road Corridors (LOS E or F) .Less than 51 new peak hour trips Pay impact fee 51 - 300 new peak hour trips Transportation Management Plan More than 300 new peak hour trips Traffic study and Transportation Management Plan Non -Deficient Road Corridors Less than 50 new peak hour trips Pay impact fee 50 or more new peak hour trips City reviews traffic impacts. Transportation Management Plan or Traffic Study may be required depending on significance of impacts. 4 f Mobility Management System Flow Chart Is the project on a deficient corridor? Yes No How many new peak hour trips? More than 300 51 -300 Less than 51 Tier 1 Project: Developer must create a transportation management plan designed to address their impacts while increasing mobility and reducing demand for single occupant vehicle travel. TMPs can be credited towards the multi -modal impact fee assessment. How many new peak hour trips? Less than 50 Developer is required to only pay the multi -modal impact fee assessment. Tier 2 Project: Developer must conduct a traffic study and submit an accompanying report. The report shall include the results of the traffic study and a transportation management plan identifying necessary improvements. The cost of TMPs implemented can be credited against the multi -modal impact fee assessment. 50 or more The City shall review and determine if the impacts of the project adversely affect the level of service of the surrounding road network. If it is determined that significant impacts will result, the City will require the developer to conduct a level of service analysis.. Based on the findings of the analysis, Tier 1 or Tier 2 requirements may be applied. LE31IMML Development Code and Comprehensive Plan January Changes to Statutes,, I,,,,-- I • 2009 Senate Bill 360 designated Pinellas County as a dense laird arearrtransportation concurrency exception area and introduced mobility plan/fee provisions • The 2011 Community Planning Act (HB 7207) made substantial amendments to Chapter 163, F.S. including repealing state mandated transportation concurrency Pinellas County Actions = The Pinellas County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) formed a Task Force made up of the various municipalities to address the changes = The Pinellas County Mobility Plan was developed in 2013 (endorsed by the MPO in September 2013) • The County conducted outreach during the development of the plan, including participation on the mobility plan task force (developers, real estate representatives, and citizens), as well as presentations t business groups, the citizens advisory committee, and the BEG- = County's amendments are scheduled to be adopted March 29, 2016 1V i I • • • TMOM 2 • Repeal level of service -based transportation concurrency management systems • Retain existing impact fee program • Utilize transportation management plan (TMP) approach to addres development impacts Pay and •• option • Intended to be a county -wide approach and improve e review process Aft C UR3XMM • Amendments are needed to the City's Comprehensive Plan and Community Development Code to remain consistent with the County • The amendments provide a tiered approach to land development or redevelopment projects • Smaller scale projects will be required to only pay the impact fee, while larger scale projects will be subject to traffic studies and/or transportation management plans • The transportation impact fee is being renamed to the impact fee The county -wide impact fee program and impact f changing and will still be administered as they are n y� e nulti-modal fists are not U 40k I I r" r,=, • Amend the Comprehensive Plan: • Add policies supporting implementation of the Mobility Plan • Remove objectives and policies related to transportation concurrency • Community Development Code: • Repeal transportation concurrency • Repeal Proportionate Fair -Share and replace with t Management System Mobility Management System Tiered development process Deficient; Road Corridors Less than 51 new peak hour trips Pay impact fee 51 - 300 new peak hour trips Transportation Management Plan More than 300 new peak hour trips Traffic study and Transportation Management Plan Non -Deficient Road Corridors Less than 50 new peak hour trips Pay impact fee 50 or more new peak hour trips City reviews traffic impacts Transportation Management Plan or Traffic Study may be required depending on significance of impacts. • Examples of Tier 1 projects (51 new peak hour trips) • 55 single family homes • 35,076 sq. ft. general office • 11,335 sq. ft. general commercial • Examples of Tier 2 projects (301 new peak hour trips) • 330 single family homes ® 298,393 sq. ft. general office • 68,035 sq. ft. general commercial Next Steps The Community Development Board unanimously recommended approval of amendments at the December 15, 2015 meeting e City Council first reading on January 21, 2016 Comprehensive Plan amendments will be reviewed by State Agencies after first reading • City Council second reading is scheduled for April 7, 2016 Mobility Management System Deficient Road Corridors (LOS E or F) Less than 51 new peak hour trips Pay impact fee 51 - 300 new peak hour trips Transportation Management Plan More than 300 new peak hour trips Traffic study and Transportation Management Plan Non -Deficient Road Corridors Less than 50 new peak hour trips Pay impact fee 50 or more new peak hour trips City reviews traffic impacts. Transportation Management Plan or Traffic Study may be required depending on significance of impacts. Mobility Management System Flow Chart Is the project on a deficient corridor? Yes No How many new peak hour trips? More than 300 51-300 Less than 51 Tier 1 Project: Developer must create a transportation management plan designed to address their impacts while increasing mobility and reducing demand for single occupant vehicle travel. TMPs can be credited towards the multi -modal impact fee assessment. How many new peak hour trips? Less than 50 Developer is required to only pay the multi -modal impact fee assessment. Tier 2 Project: Developer must conduct a traffic study and submit an accompanying report. The report shall include the results of the traffic study and a transportation management plan identifying necessary improvements. The cost of TMPs implemented can be credited against the multi -modal impact fee assessment. 50 or more The City shall review and determine if the impacts of the project adversely affect the level of service of the surrounding road network. If it is determined that significant impacts will result, the City will require the developer to conduct a level of service analysis. Based on the findings of the analysis, Tier 1 or Tier 2 requirements may be applied. Mobility Management System Deficient Road Corridors (LOS E or F) Less than 51 new peak hour trips Pay impact fee 51 - 300 new peak hour trips Transportation Management Plan More than 300 new peak hour trips Traffic study and Transportation Management Plan Non -Deficient Road Corridors Less than 50 new peak hour trips Pay impact fee 50 or more new peak hour trips City reviews traffic impacts. Transportation Management Plan or Traffic Study may be required depending on significance of impacts. Mobility Management System Flow Chart Is the project on a deficient corridor? Yes No How many new peak hour trips? More than 300 51-300 Less than 51 Less than 50 Tier 1 Project: Developer must create a transportation management plan designed to address their impacts while increasing mobility and reducing demand for single occupant vehicle travel. TMPs can be credited towards the multi -modal impact fee assessment. How many new peak hour trips? Developer is required'to only pay the multi -modal impact fee assessment. Tier 2 Project: Developer must conduct a traffic study and submit an accompanying report. The report shall include the results of the traffic study and a transportation management plan identifying necessary improvements. The cost ofTMPs implemented can be credited against the multi -modal impact fee assessment. 50 or more The City shall review and determine if the impacts of the project adversely affect the level of service of the surrounding road network. If it is determined that significant impacts will result, the City will require the developer to conduct a level of service analysis. Based on the findings of the analysis, Tier 1 or Tier 2 requirements may be applied. Mobility Management System Deficient Road Corridors (LOS E or F) Less than 51 new peak hour trips Pay impact fee 51 - 300 new peak hour trips Transportation Management Plan More than 300 new peak hour trips Traffic study and Transportation Management Plan Non -Deficient Road Corridors Less than 50 new peak hour trips Pay impact fee 50 or more new peak hour trips City reviews traffic impacts. Transportation Management Plan or Traffic Study may be required depending on significance of impacts. Mobility Management System Flow Chart Is the project on a deficient corridor? Yes No How many new peak hour trips? More than 300 51 -300 Less than 51 Tier 1 Project: Developer must create a transportation management plan designed to address their impacts while increasing mobility and reducing demand for single occupant vehicle travel. TMPs can be credited towards the multi -modal impact fee assessment. How many new peak hour trips? Less than 50 Developer is required to only pay the multi -modal impact fee assessment. Tier 2'Project: Developer must conduct a traffic study and submit an accompanying report. The report shall include the results of the traffic study and a transportation management plan identifying necessary improvements. The cost of TMPs implemented can be credited against the multi -modal impact fee assessment. 50 or more The City shall review and determine if the impacts of the project adversely affect the level of service of the surrounding road network. If it is determined that significant impacts will result, the City will require the developer to conduct a level of service analysis. Based on the findings of the analysis, Tier 1 or Tier 2 requirements may be applied. Mobility Management System Deficient Road Corridors (LOS E or F) Less than 51 new peak hour trips Pay impact fee 51 - 300 new peak hour trips Transportation Management Plan More than 300 new peak hour trips Traffic study and Transportation Management Plan Non -Deficient Road Corridors Less than 50 new peak hour trips Pay impact fee 50 or more new peak hour trips City reviews traffic impacts. Transportation Management Plan or Traffic Study may be required depending on significance of impacts. Mobility Management System Flow Chart Is the project on a deficient corridor? Yes No How many new peak hour trips? More than 300 51 -300 Less than 51 Tier 1 Project: Developer must create a transportation management plan designed to address their impacts while increasing mobility and reducing demand for single occupant vehicle travel. TMPs can be credited towards the multi -modal impact fee assessment. How many new peak hour trips? Less than 50 Developer is required to only pay the multi -modal impact fee assessment. Tier 2 Project: Developer must conduct a traffic study and submit an accompanying report. The report shall include the results of the traffic study and a transportation management plan identifying necessary improvements. The cost of TMPs implemented can be credited against the multi -modal impact fee assessment. 50 or more The City shall review and determine if the impacts of the project adversely affect the level of service of the surrounding road network. If it is determined that significant impacts will result, the City will require the developer to conduct a level of service analysis. ' Based on the findings of the analysis, Tier 1 or Tier 2 requirements may be applied. ** AMENDED FOR CITY COUNCIL ** COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD a ..� WAr PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: December 15, 2015 AGENDA ITEM: F.l CASE: CPA2015-04001 ORDINANCE NO.: 8805-16 REQUEST: Review and recommendation to the City Council, of amendments to the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan repealing transportation concurrency, establishing a Mobility Management System, allowing for non-contiguous annexations, amending certain provisions of the Capital Improvements Element for consistency with State Statutes, and updating various terms and references. INITIATED BY: City of Clearwater, Planning and Development Department BACKGROUND: The City of Clearwater Comprehensive Plan includes several policies addressing concurrency management in the Future Land Use, Transportation, Coastal Management, and Capital Improvements Elements. The application of concurrency management requirements through the local site plan review process, including the assessment of transportation impact fees, is the primary tool the City and other municipalities in Pinellas County use to manage the traffic impacts of development projects. Concurrency management requirements are imposed to ensure that permits are not issued for a development project without the public facilities and services necessary to handle its impacts being in place. Concurrency management rules also require local governments to adopt level of service standards for public services and facilities that must be maintained as a condition of development approval. The City has adopted levels of service for transportation, solid waste, sanitary sewer, stormwater, potable water, hurricane evacuation, and parks. Most impact fees are established within the Code of Ordinances, but transportation impact fees are established by the Pinellas County Code Chapter 150-40 (the Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance, or TIFO), and are applied countywide. The 2011 Community Planning Act made substantial amendments to Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, including repealing state mandated transportation concurrency. To address these changes, the Pinellas County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) coordinated with the various local governments to develop an alternative approach to transportation concurrency which would also further the development of a countywide multi -modal transportation system that could better accommodate travel options other than the personal automobile. The Pinellas County Mobility Plan was approved by the MPO in 2013, and model policies were adopted in 2014. The Pinellas County Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) approved on first reading amendments to their impact fee ordinance, changing the name to Multi -Modal Impact Fee Ordinance and creating a Mobility Management System within its land development regulations, in October 2014. It is anticipated that the Pinellas County BOCC's amendments will be adopted on March 29, 2016. The City, along with municipalities throughout the County, is amending its Comprehensive Plan and land development regulations to remain consistent with the countywide approach to mobility management and the TIFO. N, �1 Y4 ater Comprehensive Plan Amendment DEVELOPMENT �v�EwLnrnsiox The Mobility Management System that is envisioned through the new policies within this amendment would be a more flexible approach to manage the traffic impacts of development projects while increasing mobility for pedestrians, bicyclists, transit users and motor vehicles. The Mobility Management System, which is proposed to be established within the Community Development Code (see concurrent case TA2015-10006), will be a tiered development review approach requiring larger scale projects adding trips to the surrounding road network to implement transportation management strategies in -lieu of or as credit toward their impact fee assessment. These strategies could include, but are not limited to, trail, sidewalk, bus stop and intersection improvements or trip reduction programs such as carpooling or telecommuting. Smaller scale projects with limited impact on the transportation system would only be required to. pay an impact fee commensurate with the number of new trips they generate. The main purpose of the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments is to repeal transportation concurrency and set up the policy framework necessary to establish a Mobility Management System, and to remove references to transportation concurrency throughout the Comprehensive Plan. Other amendments are proposed to recognize the 2014 Interlocal Service Boundary Agreement (ISBA) between Pinellas County and municipalities, which allows voluntary annexation of non-contiguous parcels located in an enclave surrounded by city property on all sides ("Type A" Enclaves). Additionally, the Coastal Management Element is updated to address new statutory requirements by adding policies' that encourage new development to find solutions to help reduce the flood risk or flood losses and that require new development or redevelopment be consistent with or more stringent than Florida Building Code requirements. These policies add to existing policies addressing reduction of flood risk, as required by Chapter 163. Lastly, the proposed amendments include updates to the Capital Improvements Element. Many changes are. minor, including updates to reflect the most recent studies and capital improvements programs established by the MPO, Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), and the City. The Schedule of Capital Improvements is being replaced to reflect the current five-year projections and updated Revenue Summary and Program Expenditure tables for Fiscal Years 2015-2020. ANALYSIS: Substantial changes are being made to the Transportation Element, including the addition of policies pertaining to the establishment of a Mobility Management System, and the removal of language pertaining to transportation concurrency. Amendments'to the Future Land Use, Coastal Management, Intergovernmental Coordination, and Capital. Improvements Elements include removing obsolete language, updating language to be consistent with the proposed Mobility Management System, and adding policies regarding noncontiguous annexations and flood risk .and loss prevention as previously stated. Formatting changes are also being made to bring consistency among all of the elements. The proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan are summarized below: 1. Future Land Use Element [pages 2-4 of ordinance]: Simplifies the goal and objective for the Concurrency Management System; revises policies to remove transportation from concurrency requirements; updates the services for which levels of service have been adopted;. adds review criteria for Future Land Use Map and/or Zoning Atlas amendments; and adds a policy to allow voluntary annexations of non-contiguous properties within "Type A" Enclaves. Community Development Board — December 15, 2015 Revised for City Council — January 21, 2016 CPA2015-04001 —Page 2 OP mater er Comprehensive Plan Amendment DEVELO MENT REVI WLDIVSION 2. Transportation Element [pages 4-10 of ordinance]: Establishes the new Mobility Management System and related policies; adds a policy that includes transportation analysis for planning purposes; revises Objective B.1.2 and its policies to provide direction to use complete street policies when making improvements to the road network; removes references to transportation concurrency and replaces with references to the Mobility Management System; adds more policies regarding coordination with the MPO and FDOT; simplifies policies related to coordination with PSTA to identify public transit improvements; and updates various terms and plan years to most current editions. 3. Coastal Management Element [pages 10-11 of ordinance]: Removes reference to "traffic" as a required level of service objective and adds policies that aim to reduce flood risk and flood losses. 4. Intergovernmental Coordination Element [page 11 of ordinance]: Removes level of service requirement for road improvements; and adds a policy addressing coordination with FDOT with regards to access on State facilities for new development projects. 5. Capital Improvements Element [pages 11-28 of ordinance]: Removes the outdated Needs Summary; removes transportation from concurrency requirements and level of service requirements; adds reference to the Mobility Management System; updates the Schedule of Capital Improvements to the most recent five-year projections; updates the Revenue Summary and the Program Expenditures tables to the most recent five-year projections; and updates various terms and references. STANDARDS FOR REVIEW: Pursuant to Community Development Code Section 4-603.F., no amendment to the Comprehensive Plan shall be approved unless it complies with the following standards: 1. The amendment will further implementation of the Comprehensive Plan consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives contained in the plan. The proposed amendments to the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan are consistent with the following Objectives and Policy in the Plan: Policy A.6.5.3 All proposed development/redevelopment initiatives shall be reviewed for opportunities to improve pedestrian and bicycle access and consider the integration of bicycle and pedestrian transportation modes in all phases of transportation planning, new roadway design, roadway construction, roadway resurfacing, and other capital projects consistent with the City's Shifting Gears Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan 2006. On Clearwater Beach, pedestrian and bicycle improvements should adhere to the policies and design guidelines set forth in Beach by Design: A preliminary Design for Clearwater Beach and Design Guidlelines. Community Development Board — December 15, 2015 Revised for City Council—.Yanuary 21, 2016 CPA2015-04001 — Page 3 NT MA, PLANNING rD�Comprehensive Plan Amendment nEVE orMEr xv�w nrvs o1W9171'1"_X1'1'1%Wr1M _Fwl W_ C17 Objective A.6.8 Identify those areas of the City that are appropriate for redevelopment as livable communities and require that specific sustainable elements to- be used in the redevelopment of these areas. Objective H.3.1 The City shall continue to work with the PPC, the State, and the County in the orderly annexation of the City's existing enclaves. The Mobility Management System proposed within new Objective 13.1.1 and its associated policies looks to improve the transportation network for all users, including pedestrians, bicyclists, and public transit. Proposed Objective B.12 includes a policy that references Objective A.6.8, as well as other policies that further Objective A.6.8 related to Complete Streets, sidewalks, and other livable community improvements. The addition of voluntary non-contiguous "Type A" annexations allows those properties in "Type A enclaves to not have to wait until they become contiguous to City limits to annex into the City. As such, the proposed amendments will further implementation of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. 2. .The amendment is not inconsistent with other provisions of the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed amendments are not in conflict with other provisions of the Comprehensive Plan and bring further consistency between the goals, objectives, and policies and the map series. The proposed amendment will add several new objectives and policies to the Comprehensive Plan, while also simplifying other sections of the Plan. Proposed Objective B.1.1 and related policies expand the ways the city is addressing the impacts of new development on its transportation system that increases mobility for pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit users as well as for motorists. The new Mobility Management System objective and policies tie in with various Future Land Use Element policies, specifically the livable communities objective and policies which are captured in Objective A.6.8. Several proposed amendments address intergovernmental coordination between the City and other entities such as the MPO and PSTA. 3. The available uses, if applicable, to which the property may be put are appropriate to the property in question and compatible with existing and planned uses in the area. This is not applicable to the proposed amendments as they do not relate to a specific property or properties. 4. Sufficient public facilities are available to serve the property.. The adequacy of available public facilities will need to be assessed on a case-by-case basis as development proposals are received. The proposed amendments repeal transportation concurrency, however, new policies are being created that will maintain level of service as a planning tool that will be used to evaluate potential development proposals at the time of site plan review. Therefore, this is not applicable as the proposed amendments do not relate to a specific property or properties. 5. The amendment will not adversely affect the natural environment. This is not applicable to the proposed amendments. The amendments reflect updates to the state statutes and to recently approved local ordinances. Any proposed development will have to comply with Community Development Board — December 15, 2015 Revised for City Council — January 21, 2016 CPA2015-04001 —Page 4 aom Comprehensive Plan Amendment PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT � �e'rwater Chd .w'. p DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DMSION impervious surface ratio standards, tree preservation and landscaping requirements, and drainage and water quality requirements, which is evaluated at the time of site plan review. 6. The amendment will not adversely impact the use of property in the immediate area. This is not applicable to the proposed amendments as they do not relate to a specific property or properties. Any impacts would be determined at the time of site plan review, and would need to be mitigated before any development can proceed. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The purpose of this amendment is to update the Future Land Use, Transportation, Intergovernmental Coordination, and Capital Improvements Elements to reflect changes to the state statutes; to establish an objective and policies for the Mobility Management System; and to recognize the 2014 Interlocal Service Boundary Agreement between the City, Pinellas County, and other municipalities, all of which have been adopted since the last major update to the Comprehensive Plan in 2008. The proposed amendment is consistent with and will further the goals, objectives, and policies of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan, will not result in inappropriate or incompatible uses, will not adversely affect the natural environment or impact the use of property in the immediate area, and sufficient public facilities exist to implement the proposed amendment. Based upon the above, the Planning and Development Department recommends APPROVAL of Ordinance No. 8805-16 that amends the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. Prepared by Planning and Development Department Staff - Kyle Brotherton, Planner ATTACHMENTS: Resume Ordinance No. 8805-16 Community Development Board — December 15, 2015 Revised for City Council — January 21, 2016 CPA2015-04001 — Page 5 U> A,� ORDINANCE NO. 8805-16 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER (THE CITY), FLORIDA, AMENDING THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN BY AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT UPDATING THE CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND ALLOWING FOR NON-CONTIGUOUS ANNEXATIONS; BY AMENDING THE TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT ESTABLISHING A MOBILITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND REPEALING TRANSPORTATION CONCURRENCY, ESTABLISHING MULTI -MODAL DESIGN FEATURES, AND ENSURING THE CITY'S COORDINATION WITH THE METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION AND THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION; BY AMENDING THE COASTAL MANGEMENT ELEMENT BY REMOVING TRAFFIC FROM LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS AND ADDING POLICIES ENCOURAGING STRATEGIES AND ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS THAT REDUCE FLOOD RISK IN COASTAL AREAS; BY AMENDING THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT REMOVING REFERENCE TO ROAD LEVEL OF SERVICE; BY AMENDING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT REMOVING TRANSPORTATION LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS AND UPDATING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND EXPENDITURE AND REVENUE SUMMARIES; UPDATING VARIOUS TERMS AND REFERENCES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act of Florida empowers and requires the City Council of the City of Clearwater to plan for the future development and growth of the City, and to adopt and periodically amend the Comprehensive Plan, including elements and portions thereof; and WHEREAS, Florida House Bill 7207, also known as the Community Planning Act, was signed into law in 2011; and WHEREAS, the Community Planning Act removed State requirements for local government implementation of transportation concurrency management systems; and WHEREAS, the City of Clearwater participated in a multi jurisdictional Mobility Plan Task Force, facilitated by the Pinellas County Metropolitan Planning Organization, to develop a framework for a countywide approach to implementation of a mobility management system in place of transportation concurrency; and WHEREAS, the City of Clearwater desires to replace transportation concurrency with a mobility management system approach that is multi -modal, and designed to better support redevelopment and associated transportation, land use, intergovernmental, and capital improvement goals; and WHEREAS, additional amendments are proposed to address an Interlocal Service Boundary Agreement (ISBA) the city and Pinellas County entered into which allows voluntary annexations of noncontiguous properties within "Type A" enclaves, as defined in the ISBA; and WHEREAS, such ISBA should be recognized in the Comprehensive Plan; and Ordinance No. 8805-16 WHEREAS, the City Council finds it necessary, desirable and proper to adopt the amendments to the objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan in order to reflect changing conditions; now, therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. That Policy A.2.2.6 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Element, page A-1.0, be amended to read as follows: A.2.2.6 The Community Development Code,shall provide for safe on-site traffic circulation and connections to adjacent arterial and collector streets consistent with Florida Department of Transportation-and.lnstitute of Traffic Engineers design guidelines,, and other applicable roadway design standards, policies, and guidelines. Section 2. That Goal A.4 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Element, and its Objective and Policies, pages A-11 through A-12, be amended to read as follows: A.4 GOAL - THE CITY SHALL NOT PERMIT DEVELOPMENT TO OCCUR UNLESS ADEQUATE LEVEL -AF-SERVICE IS AVAILABLE TO ACCOMMODATE THE IMPACTS OF DEVELOPMENT. AREAS IN AMMIGH THE IMPACT OF EXISTING ^€V€L^PM€NT v»ci=rvT rncr� r . rrrzcrcv rr�l �r�luvr r r r �`, �+� v � o v -v �+�v+ c T €YtbCCI'1C THE ^CSIR1=o�€�-€F SERVICE W" I QC UPGRADED GANSIST€NT WIT�ETARG€T DATES FOR -AST,- _ -WRE-IMPROVEMENTr� IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE APPLICABLE CI NOTION A 1 PLAN N CI CMCAITWORK TOWARD A LAND USE PATTERN THAT CAN BE SUPPORTED BY THE AVAILABLE COMMUNITY AND PUBLIC FACILITIES THAT WOULD BE REQUIRED TO SERVE THE DEVELOPMENT. A.4.1 Objective - SeFv*Ge for reads, transit, water, sewer, gaFbage GelleGtien, and drainage systems level of ser,;mrae status will be Gens red andd ...-ade paFt of the staff FeGOMFnendati at the tome of zoning, site plan, OF plat appFeval. The level of seFVore MGnit GapaGity. The City's Concurrency Management System will ensure the compatibility of all proposed development with the capacities of the existing and planned support facilities for which a level of service has been adopted. wall not be granted until the Gity has aSSUFed t' be avamla GOnGUFFent with the impaets of development. Policies A.4.1.1 NO Rew development 9F FedevelepmeRt will be peFMitted WhiGh Gauses the level E) City -Lewises (ads, Feereatien-and open --spGe wateF, sewage treatment-, gaFbage—serieGtiG r—and drainage`-tv- fall bele_,., miniptable levels -,awever, develepment 9FdeFs may be phased OF etrTeFw,se modRe-GO„�t„� Ordinance No. 8805-16 with PFGY;GmGnS of the GORGUFFenGy management system to allow sepvires to The Concurrency Management System shall ensure proposed development is in conformance with existing and planned support facilities for which a level of service standard has. been adopted and that such facilities and services are available, at the adopted level of service standards, concurrent with the impacts of development. A.4.1.2 The City's Concurrency Management System shall include, at minimum, level of service standards for parkland, potable water, sanitary sewer, solid waste, and stormwater. A.4.1.3 The City, when making decisions on requests to amend the Future Land Use Map or the Zoning Atlas (other than decisions on appropriate locations for mixed-use or transit oriented development), shall review the potential impact on the transportation system by considering the following: a. Abilitv of the surroundina existina and planned transportation network to meet the mobility obiectives of the Comprehensive Plan: b. Capacity of the surrounding existing and planned transportation network to accommodate any projected additional demand: and c. Extent to which the proposed Future Land Use Map amendment or rezoning furthers the intent of the Comprehensive Plan to improve mobility. A.4.124 The City shall recognize the overriding Constitutional principle that private property shall not be taken without due process of law and the payment of just compensation, which principle is restated in Section 163.3194 (4) (a), Florida Statutes. Section 3. That Policy A.5.4.8 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Element, page A-14, be amended to read as follows: A.5.4.8 Study the establishment 9f #anspeFtatiOR GOnGuFFeRGy alteFnatives Use the City's Mobility Management System, as established in the City's Community Development Code, to support higher densities along redevelopment corridors and in activity centers. Section 4. That Policy A.7.1.2 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Element, page A-24, be amended to read as follows: A.7.1.2 When evaluating and prioritizing areas to annex, consideration should be given to the following: • Whether property was given high priority in the City's Sewer System Expansion Feasibility Study Update completed in 2-00 2011; Ordinance No. 8805-16 Section 5. That a new Policy A.7.2.4 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Element, page A-25, be added, with subsequent Policies renumbered, and that Policy A.7.2.6, as renumbered, be amended to fix a typographical error: , A.7.2.4 Allow voluntary annexations for noncontiguous properties that are within an enclave as defined by Section 171.032(13)(a), Florida Statutes ("Type A" enclaves). A.7.2.45 Promote economic development programs and activities to businesses within the unincorporated areas of the Clearwater Planning Area. A.7.2.56 Continue to work with property owners and Pinellas County to permit development activities in the County prior to the effective date of annexation provided the proposed development complies with the provisions of the City of Clearwater Development Code. Section 6. That the Transportation Needs Summary section of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element, page B-1, be amended to read as follows: Traffic Circulation & Mobility Multi -modal transportation improvements to Clearwater Beach should continue to be planned and/or utilized to alleviate traffic congestion and parking demands on the Memorial Causeway and the beach. Access management to improve traffic flow will continue to be an important issue in development reviews, with particular emphasis on congested links. Belleair Road (CR462) and Clearwater Memorial Causeway (SR60) are physically and/or environmentally constrained and Will GOntinue to opeFate below the aGGeptable levels of s The City will continue to work with Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), Tampa Bay Area Regional Transportation Authority (TBARTA), Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority (PSTA) and other agencies to . create and maintain a multi -modal transportation system that is safe and efficient for all users including bicyclists, pedestrians and transit users, as well as motorists. Ordinance No. 8805-16 Section 7. That the Traffic Circulation section of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element, page B-3, be renamed as follows: TRAFFIC CIRCULATION & MOBILITY Section 8. That Goal B.1 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element, page B-3, be amended and a new Objective B.1.1 and its Policies be added to read as follows, with subsequent Objectives and Policies renumbered: B.1 GOAL - THE TRAr-ArGIGG1 II ATION SYSTCIIA THE CITY SHALL PROVIDE FOR THE A SAFE,_CONVENIENT AND ENERGY EFFICIENT DELIVERY GIF PEOPLE AND GOODS BY A MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM THAT SERVES TO INCREASE MOBILITY, EFFICIENTLY UTILIZE ROADWAY CAPACITY, REDUCE THE INCIDENCE OF SINGLE -OCCUPANT VEHICLE TRAVEL REDUCE THE CONTRIBUTION TO AIR POLLUTION FROM MOTOR VEHICLES, AND IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF LIFE TO THE CITIZENS OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER. B.1.1 Objective — Maintain the major road network performance within the City while furthering development of a multi -modal transportation system that increases mobility for pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit users as well as for motorists. Policies B.1.1.1 The Citv shall establish a Mobilitv Manaqement Svstem within the City's Communi Development Code. Impacts of land development projects shall be managed through the application of Transportation Element policies, through requirements of the Community Development Code, and through the site plan review process. The Mobility Management System shall address the following: a. All development proiects generating new peak hour trips shall be subiect to payment of a multi -modal impact fee. b. Development proiects that generate between 51 and 300 new peak hour trips of deficient roads shall be classified as tier 1 and required to submit a transportation management plan (TMP) designed to address their impacts while increasing mobility and reducing demand for single occupant vehicle travel. c. Development projects that generate more than 300 new peak hour trips on deficient roads shall be classified as tier 2, required to conduct a traffic impact study, and submit an accompanying report and TMP based on the report findings. d. Multi -modal impact fee assessments may be applied as credit toward the cost of a TMP. e. A traffic study and/or TMP for a development project not impacting a deficient road corridor shall be required if necessary to address the impact of additional trips generated by the project on the surrounding traffic circulation system. B.1.1.2 The City shall continue to use roadway levels of service for planninq purposes. 8.1.1.3 The Communitv Development Code shall include the identification of "deficient" roadways, as identified through the annual Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Level of Service Report, including facilities operating at peak hour level of service (LOS) E and F and/or volume -to -capacity (v/c) ratio 0.9 or greater without a mitigating improvement scheduled for construction within three years. Ordinance No. 8805-16 6.1.1.4 The City shall utilize multi -modal impact fee revenue to fund multi -modal improvements to local, county, or state facilities that are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan as well as the MPO Long Range Transportation Plan 2040. B.1.1.5 The City shall work cooperatively with the MPO and other local governments to complete the biennial update of the Multi -modal Impact Fee Ordinance throuqh the MPO planning process. B.1.1.6 The City shall continue to work with the Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority (PSTA) to increase the efficiency of the fixed -route system by encouraging mass transit use through the application of the Mobility Management System and the City's site plan review process. Section 9. That Objective B.1.2 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element, as renumbered by this ordinance, page B-3, and its Policies be amended, and Policies B.1.2.3 through B.1.2.8 be added to read as follows, with subsequent Objectives and Policies renumbered: 8.1.42 Objective — . Future improvements to arterial and collector streets shall be context -sensitive by planning and designing the roadway based on the existing context of the surrounding built environment and the planned land use vision. B.1.42.1 The City shall continue to administer access management and right-of-way requirements through the Community Development Code. B.1.42.2 The City will promote programs that ensure physical safety of non -motorized transportation users in accordance with the City's Shifting Gears: Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan. B.1.2.3 The Citv will operate. maintain. and improve the Citv transportation system consistent with the Florida Department of Transportation's (FDOT) Complete Streets Policy. B.1.2.4 The City shall coordinate efforts with FDOT to incorporate bicycle and pedestrian- friendly provisions in the design and construction of expansion and resurfacing. projects on State roads, where feasible. B.1.2.5 The City shall require land development projects to make adequate provisions for bicycle parking and storage as appropriate. 8.1.2.6 The City shall include sidewalks where feasible alongside roadways scheduled for resurfacing. B.1.2.7 The City shall install landscaping along sidewalks usinq tree canopy, where feasible, to provide shaded areas for pedestrians. 6.1.2.8 The City shall incorporate livable community requirements such as Objective A.6.8 and its Policies to proposed developments or redevelopments. Ordinance No. 8805-16 Section 10. That Objective B.1.3 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element, pages B-3 and B-4, and its Policies be amended as follows: B.1.34 Objective - The City will continue to monitor traffic counts, accidents, and road improvements, to provide timely status evaluation of level of service conditions4of a ssuaAGe of development approvals-. Policies B.1.34.1 Requests fOF amendment to the F=UtUFe Land Use Map will have aR analysis of tFaffie iFApaGts. The City shallicontinue to review potential trips generated by Future Land Use Map amendments and Zoning Atlas Amendments based upon the Mobility Management System. B.1.34.32 The GGRGUFF8R6y Mobilily +Management system will be eRhaased applied through improved departmental coordination. Section 11. That Policies B.1.4.1 through B.1.4.7 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element, pages B-4 and B-5, be amended to read as follows: Policies B.1.45.1 The City shall continue to review trips generated by land 'development projects through the TFaffiG GGRGUFFenGy Management RFGgFam Mobility Management System. 8.1.45.2 For those roads which are not currently operating at an acceptable LOS, or which do not havea mitiaatina improvement scheduled for construction within three years, the GGRGUFFenGY Mobilily mManagement sSystem shall be used to monitor traffic growth, with the dual intent of maintaining average operating speeds and restricting the aggregate and individual trips generated by development in the City limits. Ordinance No. 8805-16 B.1.45.53 Redevelopment and/or revitalization projects shall be coordinated with the FDOT and the Department of Economic �o.V Opportunity (DEO) to assess impacts on US 19. fbe in plaGe OF undeF ;;4,�! nAPqtr,,iI ' A " fffith ' iA 3 yeaFs aft' of a building 6.1.45.74 The City shall cooperate with the MPO to ensure consistency between comprehensive plani amendments and the Pinellas MPO Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) 2425 2040. Section 12. That Objective B.1.5 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element, page B-5, and its Policies be deleted: - =M MMr - - - - - MW ■ar W"MMM-60I.M.W. MUNI Ordinance No. 8805-16 Section 13. That Objective B.2.1 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element, page B-6, be amended, and Policies 13.2.1.2 and B.2.1.3 be added to read as follows: B.2.1 Objective - Roadway improvements to obtain desired Levels ofS re -must be included in State, County, and City capital budgets. The City shall actively participate, on a continuing basis, with both the staff and elected official support, in the preparation, adoption and implementation of transportation plans and expenditure programs of the RAS MPO, PSTA, Board of County Commissioners, and the i`41 -0-.T FDOT. B.2.1.1 The City shall review and comment on the proposed capital improvement programs and provide input to the adopting agencies relative to consistency with Clearwater's Comprehensive Plan. B.2.1.2 The City shall provide the MPO with available up-to-date traffic data, such as signal timings and traffic counts to assist with level -of -service monitoring and development o� of the MPO's Long Range Transportation Plan. rd� �� •� �B.2.1.3 The City shall continue to participate with the MPO and/or its Technical Coordinating Committee (TCC) to ensure that the level of service standards for US Highway 19, a Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) facility, is consistent with FDOT's LOS designation of D for this road. Section 14. That Objective B.2.3 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element, page B-8, be amended, and that Policy B.2.3.2 be deleted as follows: B.2.3 Objective - The City of Clearwater shall annually update the Gity'^ TFanspeFtatlen and coordinate with and provide input in the update of the Metropolitan Planning Organization's (MPO) Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) involving County and State roads. The following tFansper-tation iMPFGvement PFGjeGtS that will • enhanGe Fead GapaGity aFe srheduled fGF GGRStFUGti0R within City, County and State AAc,hfi--11u. C County ,.�.nenRnn�othCoad �t-BTsS.. #eetSumrnaFy: GORCAFUGSt southbouRd Fight tum lane and e)deRd left tuFA lanes • MGMviteR-Q^v^vth Re --ad- at F=RteFPFise Reread County Policies Ordinance No. 8805-16 13.2.3.1 Road improvements which are currently programmed for construction should be continued in the Capital Improvement Element of the jurisdiction having operational responsibility for those roads. Section 15. That. Objective B.4.4 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element, page B-14, and Policies B.4.4.1 and B.4.4.2 be amended to read as follows: B.4.4 Objective — The City shall participate and cooperate with agencies and committees to enhance and promote the use ofmasstrans°+ public transportation system. B.4.4.1 Clearwater shall coordinate with PSTA and the MPO in the development of the Five -Year Transit Development P-regram-Plan to addFe6s tFaR i+ guideline identify and include transit improvements that benefit the City. B.4.4.2 Clearwater will cooperate with PSTA and the MPO to improve the tFansi+ sy6te.n +„ oe*nG*de with the detailed an the yeaF 2010 and 2016 MOSt GUFFeRt ver -cion of the Long Range Mass TFaRE;i+ P!aR . identify transit improvements that could be incorporated as part of corridor plans or development proiects. Section 16. That Objective E.1.5 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. Coastal Management Element, page E-5, be amended to read as follows: E.1.5 Objective - Ltevel of service standards as defined in the functional elements of the . Comprehensive Plan (traffic public utilities, recreation and open space), are �y established and are recognized as applicable to the coastal storm area. Section 17. That Objective E.1.6 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Coastal �SWanagement Element, page. E-5, be amended to read as follows, and that new Policies E.1.6.2 and \ E:1.6.3 be added to read as follows, with subsequent Policies renumbered: � v --n E.1.6 Objective - Development and Rredevelopment areas established in the coastal storm area should address the needs and opportunities unique to those locations. E.1.6.1 Redevelopment proposals and plans shall be reviewed for compliance with the goals, objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan and other appropriate plans including Beach by Design: A Preliminary Design for Clearwater Beach and Design Guidelines and the City's NFIP Community Rating System Floodplain Management Plan. E.1.6.2 New development or redevelopment is encouraged to include principles, strategies, or engineering solutions that: a. reduce the flood risk in the coastal areas which results from hiah-tide events storm surge, flash floods, stormwater runoff, and the related impacts of sea -level rise; b. may reduce losses due to floodina and claims made under flood insurance olicies issued in this state. 10 Ordinance No. 8805-16 E.1.6.3 New development or redevelopment shall be consistent with, or more stringent than, the flood -resistant construction requirements in the Florida Building Code and applicable flood plain management regulations set forth in 44 C.F.R. part 60. Section 18. That the Intergovernmental Coordination Needs Summary of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Intergovernmental Coordination Element, page H-1, be amended to read as follows: Intergovernmental Coordination Needs Summary The following summarizes the Intergovernmental Coordination Element: Road improvements; and backlogged facilities and levels of ce^^^e need the coordination of all jurisdictions along the corridor in establishing and maintaining appropriate land use and traffic policies. Coordination with the Florida Department of Transportation(FDOT) is also a major issue to be addressed by continued participation in the M..P-O- process. In addition, Clearwater should continue to be involved with the Tampa Bay Area Regional Transportation Authority (TBARTA) planning process. Section 19. That Objective H.2.2 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Intergovernmental Coordination Element, page H-4, and its Policies be amended, and Policy H.2.2.3 be added to read as follows: H.2.2 Objective - The City shall adopt the F, -I�T. MOTlevel of sew a Ge standards for State primary and secondary arterials as they may be modified by additional service designations (special transportation areas, etc.) approved by r- D 0 T MOT and shall use intergovernmental coordination agreements to secure maximum City control over access and management of roads in Clearwater. Policies H.2.2.1 The City shall continue to cooperate with .D.G.T. FDOT in all matters of traffic signal access requests that affect the State highway system. H.2.2.2 Clearwater shall provide .D.G.T. FDOT with annual reports that document efforts at concurrency management on State roads. H.2.2.3 The City will consult with FDOT with regard to the access onto State facilities for new land development projects. Section 20. That the Capital Improvements Element Needs Summary of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element, page 1-1, be deleted as follows: 11 Ordinance No. 8805-16 Section 21. That Objective 1.1.1 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element, page 1-2, and Policies 1.1.1.2, 1.1.1.5, 1.1.1.9, 1.1.1.11, and 1.1.1.12 be amended to read as follows: 1.1.1 Objective - The Capital Improvements Element (CIE) of the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Clearwater shall be reviewed and adopted annually in light of the needs addressed in various elements of the Comprehensive Plan including the fifth year needs of earsh subsequent adeption. 1.1.1.2 The Aannual Wuupdate to the Five -Year Schedule of Capital Improvements Capital Ele-men is hereby incorporated by reference and is located following p.Policy 1.1.6.3. 1.1.1.5 Capital improvements projects proposed for inclusion in the schedule of capital improvements should be evaluated on the following criteria and considered in the priority listed below: 1.1.1.9 As stated in the City Charter, the total indebtedness of the City of Clearwater, which for the purpose of this limitation shall include revenue, refunding and improvement bonds, of the City of GleaFwateF shall not exceed twenty percent (20%) of the current assessed valuation of all real property located in the City-;-, B. Ttotal budgeted expenditures in any fiscal year shall not exceed the total estimated revenue plus any unencumbered funds carried forward from a prior fiscal year. 12 Ordinance No. 8805-16 1.1.1.11 , 20 The City will coordinate with the FDOT and the Pinellas County MPO to promote the inclusion of projects in the plans and programs of these agencies into the Five -Year Schedule of Capital Improvements. ago M-10 . . Section 22. That Policy 1.1.3.1 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element, page 1-5, be amended to read as follows: 1.1.3.1 Essential public facilities as defined in this plan include and are limited to those facilities relating to sanitary sewer, solid waste, stormwater, potable water, ir�erfiatien, and parks and recreation systems. Section 23. That Policy 1.1.3.3 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element, page 1-5, be amended to read as follows: 1.1.3.3 If it is determined that sufficient capacity of essential public facilities will be available concurrent with the impacts of a proposed development, a final development order may be issued in accordance with the following schedule: Section 24. That Table: Summary of Level of Service Standards in Policy 1.1.3.7 Capital Improvements Element, of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan, page 1-7, be amended to read as follows: Table: Summary of Level of Service Standards Facilities Element LOS Standard TFanspeFtati Trite rnispmFtati LOS G daily and LOS D pm peak f9F all Feads Sanitary Sewer Utilities Average of 127gallons per person per day GPCD Solid Waste Utilities Average Solid Waste Generator Rate of 7.12 pounds per capita per da Stormwater Utilities Design storm: 10 — year storm frequency for all new street development using the rational design method 25 — year frequency with positive outfall for major storm systems with basin time of intensities controlling the duration.* 50 — year storm frequency when no outfall and discharge is to street right-of-way.* 13 Ordinance No. 8805-16 Section 25. That a new Policy 1.1.4.8 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements. Element, page 1-8, be added to read as follows: Policies Section 26. That Policy 1.1.5.1 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element, page 1-8, be deleted as follows, and that Policy 1.1.5.4, page 1-9, be amended to read as follows, with Policies renumbered: Policies 1.1.5.21 The City shall recognize the overriding Constitutional principle that private property shall not be taken without due process of law and the payment of just compensation, which principle is restated in Section 163.3194 (4) (a) Florida Statutes. 14 Ordinance No. 8805-16 100 — year storm frequency when no outfall and discharge is across private property.* * Design standards for stormwater quality treatment/storage quantity shall conform to the current SWFWMD requirement [Presently being the SCS Unit Hydrograph design method, using the design storm frequency and a twenty-four (24) hour duration for sites ten (10) acres or more, and the rational design method for sites under ten 10 acres]. Potable Water Utilities Average Water Consumption Rate and Natural 120 gallons per capita per day at a pressure of Ground Water 40-45 psi.* Aquifer *Continue to maintain water consumption of Recharge one hundred twenty (120) GPCPD or less as per the conditions set forth by Clearwater's Water Use Permit. Hurricane Coastal 16 hours (out of county for a category 5 -storm Evacuation Management event as measured on the Saffir-Simpson scale Parks Recreation 4 acres of parkland per one thousand (1,000) and Open persons for Citywide application Space Section 25. That a new Policy 1.1.4.8 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements. Element, page 1-8, be added to read as follows: Policies Section 26. That Policy 1.1.5.1 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element, page 1-8, be deleted as follows, and that Policy 1.1.5.4, page 1-9, be amended to read as follows, with Policies renumbered: Policies 1.1.5.21 The City shall recognize the overriding Constitutional principle that private property shall not be taken without due process of law and the payment of just compensation, which principle is restated in Section 163.3194 (4) (a) Florida Statutes. 14 Ordinance No. 8805-16 1.1.5.32 In the planning of capital improvements, the City shall consider the effect of such improvement on local resources listed on the National Register of Historic Places with the intent to preserve the integrity of such places. 1.1.5.43 In the planning of capital improvements, the City shall consider the effects of controversial public facilities, such as landfills, prisons, and power lines, with the intent of locating them in areas where they may best serve their purpose and have the fewest negative impacts. 1.1.5.54 The City will require develepefs development to be consistent with the provisions of the Mobility Management System established in Goal B.1 of the Transportation Element. Section 27. That the Annual Update to the Capital Improvements Element of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element, page 1-10 through 1-14, be amended to read as follows: FY20105/146 ANNUAL UPDATE TO THE SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT E Lztrvr�-�T In the following, the concurrency -related public facilities (i.e., solid waste, potable water, stormwater, sanitary sewer, and parkland and reads) are evaluated to determine that the City's adopted level of service (LOS) standards are currently being met and will be adequate to serve approved and planned development over the next five years. The adopted Clearwater Capital Improvement Program, FYOil —FY2015-16 – FY2019/20 indicates the timing, location and funding of capital projects needed to meet future public facilities' demands and demonstrate that the Comprehensive Plan is financially feasible. Current populations (2008 2015 estimate): 440,831 110,679 Projected 2018 populations (per Future Land use Element): 120,028 SOLID WASTE: Current Capacity: 7.12 lbs per capita per day Current demand: 54-9 4.89 lbs per capita per day Fiscal Year Projected Projected Surplus Demand (lbs per Capacity (lbs per Deficit ca ita er da capita per da 2015/16 4.89 7.12 2.23 2016/17 4.89 7.12 2.23 15 Ordinance No. 8805-16 2017/18 4.89 7.12 2.23 2018/19 4.89 7.12 2.23 2019/20 4.89 7.12 2.23 Totals 2019/20 4.89 7.12 2.23 Total solid waste generated by the City in 2008 (in tons): 104,898 Current pounds of solid waste per capita per day: 5a-9 4.89 *The current capacity is based on the City's solid waste LOS standard. Capacity is actually greater since the City's Solid Waste Department is able to dispose of all waste produced within the City, as it coordinates with Pinellas County and other private facilities and vendors for waste disposal. The majority (80-85%) of all solid waste is disposed of at the Pinellas County.Solid Waste to Energy Plant where most is incinerated and any remaining material is landfilled. According to the Pinellas County Technical Management Committee, the most recent projections take the life of the county landfill to year 2065. POTABLE WATER: - Current capacity: 2-5 23.5 MGD Current demand: 42411.4 MGD Fiscal Year Projected Demand Maximum Projected Capacity Minimum Surplus Deficit 2015/16 11.4 20.75 9.36 2016/17 11..4 20.75 9.36 2017/18 11.5 20.75 9.35 2018/19 11.5 20.75 9.35 2019/20 11.6 20.75 9.34 Totals (2QI2/201 11.6 1 20.75 12.34 MGD =million gallons per day; Projections as per the City's Water Master Plan. ' Potable water LOS standard: 120 gallons per capita per day Current capacity: Total potable water available per day in gallons: 2000,000 23,500,000 (25-.0 23.5 MGD) Gallons available per -capita peF day: 225.56 Current demand: 16 Ordinance No. 8805-16 Total potable water consumption per day in gallons: 12,000,000 11,400,000 (4-2-.0 11.4 MGD) Gallons $en6urted peF nanita p day: 108.27 STORMWATER: oo . . . a . •EFS • Vii. • • . • • • • • • n. • Effs • 0 11 • • a. Stormwater LOS Standard: No adverse impacts to existing floodplain elevations and no increase in stormwater flow rate leaving a site. Notes: 1. The City of Clearwater Drainage Design Criteria was updated in September 2015 which specifies the design storms for new development in the City. Design Storm 10 -year storm frequency for all new developments for street drainage, storm systems, and culverts 25 -year storm frequency for all new developments for channels and detention areas with outfalls 50 -year storm frequency for all new develo ments for detention areas without outfalls 100 -year storm frequency for all new developments for detention areas without outfalls which overflow onto private 12rol2erty when ca aci is exceeded Design standards for stormwater quality treatment/storage quantity shall conform to the current SWFWMD requirement [Presently being the SCS Unit Hydro -graph design method, using the desiqn storm frequency and a twenty-four (24) hour duration for sites ten (10) acres or more, and the rational design method for sites under ten (10) acres . 17 Ordinance No. 8805-16 2. Development plans are .reviewed for stormwater on a permit -by -permit basis. The City only approves a development if it meets the LOS standards per the City's design criteria. 3. Major watersheds within the City Limits with Watershed Master Plans are Alligator Creek, Allen's Creek, and Stevenson Creek. The City also includes Coastal Zones 1-4 , the Beach Zone and to a lesser extent, Curlew Creek, Possum Creek, Bishop Creek, and Mullet Creek. 4. In establishing Capital Improvement Projects for City projects, projects are determined through the number of structures removed from the 100 -year floodplain and improvements in roadway level of service with consideration for regional needs and cost benefit. SANITARY SEWER: Current capacity: 257 gallons per capita per day Current demand: 427 113 gallons per capita per day Fiscal Year Projected Projected Surplus Demand Capacity (Deficit) Maximum Minimum 2009110 2015/16 444 12.5 MGD 28.5 MGD 44.4 16.0 MGD 1 2016/17 44-2 12.5 MGD 28.5 MGD 4473 16.0 MGD 2011 A 2017/18 44-.2 12.5 MGD 28.5 MGD 444 16.0 MGD 201213 2018/19 44,3 12.5 MGD 28.5 MGD 44--2- 16.0 MGD 2013114-2019/20 444 12.6 MGD 28.5 MGD 44-.2 15.9 MGD Totals (2943/44 14.3 MGD 28.5 MGD 44-2 15.9 2019/20) MGD MGD = million gallons per day; Projections as per the City's Water Pollution Control (WPC) Master Plan. Sanitary sewer LOS standard: Current capacity (in gallons): Gallons available per capita per day Current demand: Gallons available per capita per day PARKLAND: 127 gallons per capita per day 28,500,000 2x714 257.50 44,100,000 12,500,000 42722 112.94 Current parkland acres: 1,711 Current parkland acres per 1,000 persons: 15.46 G grant demand: 4 aures nor 1,000 pepsene Minimum parkland acres to meet adopted LOS: 442.72 Fiscal Year Prejeet Projected Surplus Oemand Adopted Capacity (Deficit) Level of Service (M+R+ ) 18 Ordinance No. 8805-16 2989149 2015/16 4 per 1,000 431 15.46 per 9-34. 11.46 per 1,000 1,000 1 2016/17 4 per 1,000 13.31 15.46 per 9.34 11.46 per 1,000 1,000 201 11 2 2017/18 4 per 1,000 43.31 15.46 per 9:-34 11.46 per 1,000 1,000 o^� 2018/19 4 per 1,000 13.31 15.46 per 9:34- 11.46 per aEM MUM M -2 -M -2-- 1,000 1,000 2043144 2019/20 4 per 1,000 431 15.46 per 9:31. 11.46 per 1,000 1,000 Totals 4 per 1,000 431 15.46 per 9.31. 11.46 per 1,000 1,000 Note: Parkland is calculated using parklands that are within Citv boundaries that are owned and/or operated by the City. GUFFent demand: 440-430.74aGFeG @ 4 p^000 peFsees Teal(aaGFeslper�ousand-per-sens} 1,475 4 Q� ' aGFes @ 13 31 �r ^er . ,000 perrrsens ROADS: �- �-c i ) b . r�w+ov +� t�.b \ c 5 a � A rccer,T Kpo Lc� S Roadway LOS standard: C Average Daily, D Peak Hour Arterial and collector roadways currently operating below the adopted peak hour LOS standard include: 19 Ordinance No. 8805-16 oo�ao aEM MUM M -2 -M -2-- �! _ v_ 19 Ordinance No. 8805-16 Notes: 1. CR – County road; CL – City of Clearwater; SR – State road. 2. Policy constrained roadway per the 2935 2040 Pinellas County Long Range Transportation Plan. 3. Related capacity improvement identified in the Pinellas County Transportation Improvement Program, FY 2048 2015/16 _ FY 2845 2019/20. 4. Related capacity improvement identified in the Florida. Department of Transportation Five - Year Work Program, FY 2011 2015-2020. 5. 2025 2035 level of senrine nFe I ieniiGR6 indiGate impFavemnnt to OS n Source: Facility Level of Service Analysis, Pinellas County MPO, 2889 2015' Arterial and collector roadways projected to operate below the adopted LOS standard in 2825 2035 are listed below. Note: The Pinellas MPO does not calculate interim year LOS projections (e.g., 2015), therefore, 28252035 data is used. Volume/ # Roadway F dttFts} Road Length Capacity 2026 Level Type LM -4 Ratio # Roadway Segment Juris' LOS 504 Belleair Rd (Keene Rd to US 19)2 CR 21.1 1.969 1.042 F 565 Court St (Missouri Ave to Highland SR 4D 0.755 0.978 E Ave 568 Courtney Campbell Cswv 4D 5.235 1.143 F Hillborou h CL to Ba shore Blvd)SR 683 Ft Harrison Ave (Belleair Rd to CL 2D 1.551 1.195 F — Chestnut St)— — – 684 Ft Harrison Ave (Chestnut St to CL 2D 0.498 1.05 F — Drew St — – 857 McMullen Booth Rd (Gulf to Bay CR 6D 2.267 1.315 F Blvd to Sunset Point — – 858 McMullen Booth Rd (Sunset Point CR 6D 2.233 1.315 F Road to SR 580 — – 859 McMullen Booth Rd (SR 580 to CR 6D 1.768 0.964 F — Curlew Rd — 6D – 867 Memorial Causeway (Clwtr Beach SR 4D 0.447 0.964 E Roundabout to Island Way)— — — – 1099 US 19 (SR 580 to Curlew Rd) SR 6D 2.035 1.475 F3, a Notes: 1. CR – County road; CL – City of Clearwater; SR – State road. 2. Policy constrained roadway per the 2935 2040 Pinellas County Long Range Transportation Plan. 3. Related capacity improvement identified in the Pinellas County Transportation Improvement Program, FY 2048 2015/16 _ FY 2845 2019/20. 4. Related capacity improvement identified in the Florida. Department of Transportation Five - Year Work Program, FY 2011 2015-2020. 5. 2025 2035 level of senrine nFe I ieniiGR6 indiGate impFavemnnt to OS n Source: Facility Level of Service Analysis, Pinellas County MPO, 2889 2015' Arterial and collector roadways projected to operate below the adopted LOS standard in 2825 2035 are listed below. Note: The Pinellas MPO does not calculate interim year LOS projections (e.g., 2015), therefore, 28252035 data is used. 20 Ordinance No. 8805-16 F # Roadway F dttFts} Length 2026 Level Type {mi} AA1V of SeFyic@ 548 ��i I IC 41# 10/Crinen4er /�AvrFle in may SR 2-U 2.091 24742 20 Ordinance No. 8805-16 21 Ordinance No. 8805-16 MEW== _ - mw,nlmam�- ©©®© 0 - : 0 _ '- - - © -- - __ - ©© �• O 21 Ordinance No. 8805-16 # Roadway Segment Juris' Road Length AADT2 LOS Type mi 573 — Belcher Rd (Gulf to Bay Blvd to NE Coachman Rd CR — 4E — 0.805 33,361 F — 574 — Belcher Rd (NE Coachman Rd to CR — 41) — 1.237 40,000 F — Sunset Point Rd 581 Belleair Rd (US 19 to Keene RdZ CR 2E 1.969 16,743 F 582 Belleair Rd (Keene Rd to Missouri Ave) CR 2U 1.523 13,333 F 583 Belleair Rd (Missouri Ave to MLK Jr. CR 2U 0.252 11.000 E Ave 650 Countryside Blvd (Belcher Rd to US 19) CL 4D 0.538 32,500 E 657 Court St (Missouri Ave to Highland Ave) SR 14D 0.755 35,334 1F 660 — Courtney Campbell Cswy (Hillsborough SR — 4D — 5.235 68,000 F — CL to Ba shore Blvd 727 Druid Rd (US 19 to Belcher Rd) CL 2D 1.09 12,500 E 728 Druid Rd (Belcher Rd to. Keene Rd) CL 2U 1.007 11,000 E 729 Druid Rd (Keene Rd to Highland Ave) CL 2U 0.774 12,163 F 785 — Ft Harrison Ave (Belleair Rd to Chestnut St)— CL 2D — 1.551 25,167 F — 786 Ft Harrison Ave (Chestnut St to Drew CL 2D 0.498 24,234 F St) 827 to Bay Blvd (Bayshore Blvd to US SR 6D 1.512 66,960 F Gulf 828 Gulf to Bay Blvd (US 19 to Belcher Rd) SR 6D 0.986 67,500 F 830 Gulf to Bay Blvd (Highland Ave to Keene Rd SR — 6D 0.756 60,999 F — 831 Gulf to Bay Blvd (Keene Rd to Belcher SR 6D 1.026 62,754 F Rd) 832 — Gulfview Blvd (Clearwater Pass to Roundabout)— CL 2D — 1.132 18,020 F — 848 Highland Ave (Belleair Rd to Druid Rd) CR 2U 1.255 16,500 F 850 Highland Ave (Gulf to Bay Blvd to Drew CL 2D 0.506 18,174 F S11 851 Highland Ave (Drew St to Sunset Point CL 2D .1.512 18,668 F Bdj 852 Highland Ave (Sunset Point Rd to Union CL 2U 0.504 18,000 F St 892 Keene Rd (Belleair Rd to Druid Rd) CR 4D 1.255 34,801 F 895 Keene Rd (Drew St to Sunset Point Rd) CR 4D 1.518 34,500 F 968 — McMullen Booth Rd (Gulf to Bay Blvd to CR — 6D — 2.267 72,011 F — Sunset Point Rd 969 — McMullen Booth Rd (Sunset Point Rd to CR — 6D — 2.233 74,000 F — SR 580 970 McMullen Booth Rd (SR 580 to Curlew CR 6D 1.768 66,000 F Rd 979 — Memorial Cswy (Clwtr Beach Roundabout to Island Wa SR — 4D — 0.447 41,500 F — 1008 NE Coachman Rd (Drew St to US 19) SR 2U 1.741 25.068 F 22 Ordinance No. 8805-16 1019 1 Nursery Rd (US 19 to Belcher Rd) CR 2E 0.961 11,500 E 1154 SR 580 (US 19 to Belcher Rd) SR 6D 0.556 55,000 F 1192 Sunset Point Rd (Keene Rd to Belcher CR 4D 1.098 34,003 F Bdj 1193 Sunset Point Rd (Belcher Rd to US 19) CR 4D 0.959 36,562 F 112301 US 19 (SR 580 to Curlew Rd) SR 6P 2.035 100,000 E Notes: 1. CR — County road; CL — City of Clearwater; SR — State road. 2. AADT — Annual Average Daily Traffic. 3. Policy constrained roadway per the 2935 2040 Pinellas County Long Range Transportation Plan or Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. Source: Year 20215 2015 AADT Traffic Forecast and PM Peak Level Sof Service, Pinellas County MPO, 2009. 23 Ordinance No. 8805-16 Section 28. That the Capital Improvement Program Revenue Summary of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element, page 1-15 through 1-17, be repealed and replaced to read as follows: 24 Ordinance No. 8805-16 .. ... ... - --- .. ... ... - --- . •. MINIM ... - --- .. •. ... ... - --- .. ... ... - --- •. ... ... - -- •-- .. ... .... -- --- - .. ... -- --- ... - --- - --- .. ... -- --- ... - --- - --- .. ... --- --- ... - --- - --- MIM .. .. -- --- ... - --- - --- . .. ... -- --- ... - --- - --- .. -- ... --- ... - --- - --- ... --- .. --- ..... -- --- -- --- - - -- --- -- --- -- --- -- --- --- --- .... . .... . ... . ... . ... ... ... . ..... ... 24 Ordinance No. 8805-16 '^sv11112 360;760 2012113 289,080 361,520 361,620 1,$79,160 X60 292,600 341,038 299,660 1,843,030 640,:760 942,660 333;650 4,948,600 25 Ordinance No. 8805-16 a TNT& •! ! •. ! �! 25 Ordinance No. 8805-16 CITY OF CLEARWATER 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 Total GENERAL SOURCES General Revenue 2,836,150 3,003,140 3,256,980 3,129,530 6,981,480 3,043,560 22,250,840 Road Millage 2,060,100 2,060,100 2,060,100 2,060,100 2,060,100 2,060,100 12,360,600 Penny for Pinellas 6.021,820 14,980,060 5,439,840 10,263,460 9,5 5,250 0 46,260.430 Transportation Impact Fees 190,000 190,000 140,000 140,000 140,000 140,000 940,000 Local Option Gas Tax 1,438,330 1,450.000 0 0 0 0 2,888,330 Special Program Fund 935,000 530,000 30.000 30,000 30,000 30.000 1.585,000 Grants - Other Agencies 1.485,000 560,000 80.000 960,000 3,040,000 0 6,125,000 Donations 100.000 50,000 0 0 0 0 150,000 To Be Determined 0 22,397,000 1483740 1 929,880 2 227,150 " 2,223,390 30,261 160 Subtotal General Sources 15,066,400 45,220,300 12,490,660 18,512,970 24,033,980 7,497,050 .122,821,360 SELF-SUPPORTING FUNDS Marine Revenue 95,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 445.000 Clearwater Harbor Marina Fund 25,000 25,000 25.000 - 25,000 25,000 25.000 150,000 Aviation Revenue 25.000 155,000 35,000 15.000 15,000 15.000 260,000 Parking Revenue 2,409,000 410.500 406.000 /407,500 409,000 409,000 4,451,000 Water Revenue 2.586,000 2,240,470 3,071,000 4,651,000 4,271,000 4,251,000 21,070,470 Sewer Revenue 8,412,830 7.879.280 5,200,960 4.853,500 6,161,480 7,040,510 39.548,560 Water Impact Fees 24,000 24,000 24,000 24,000 24,000 24,000 144,000 Sewer Impact Fees 82,130 12,460 12,460 12,460 12,460 12,460 144,430 Utility R&R 8,667.170 9,205,680 3,939,040 4,030,390 4,030,390 4,367,030 34,23000 Stormwater Utility Revenue 5,498,550 5.825,100 5.831,860 6,348,450 6,729,430 6,294,000 36,527,390 Gas Revenue 6,050.000 4.050,000 13,850,000 4,050,000 4,050,000 4,050.000 36,100,000 Solid Waste Revenue 535,000 535,000 535,000 535,000 535,000 535,000 3,210,000 Recycling Revenue 90.000 100,000 100,000 100.000 100.000 100.000 590.000 Subtotal Self -Supporting Funds 34,499,680 30,532,490 33,100,320 25,122,300 26,432,760 27,193,000 176,880,550 INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS Garage Fund Revenue 77,400 79,720 82,110 84,580 87.110 89,730 500,650 Administrative Service Revenue 1,710.000 1,350,000 1.150.000 1,150.000 1.706,860 1,475.000 8,541,860 Subtotal Internal Services Fund 1,787,400 1,429,720 1,232,110 1,234,580 1-793,970 1,564,730 9,042,510 MITIVINT4 26 Ordinance No. 8805-16 Lease Purchase - General Fund 246,000 608,000 2550,820 643,220 976,950 1,832,800 6,857,790 Subtotal Borrowing/General Sources 246,000 608,000 2,550,820 643,220 976,950 1,832,800 6,857,790 SELF-SUPPORTING FUNDS Lease Purchase - Stormwater 320,000 0 0 0 0 0 320,000 Lease Purchase - Gas 161,000 0 0 0 0 0 161,000 Lease Purchase - Water 60,000 0 0 0 0 0 60,000 Lease Purchase - Sewer 109,000 0 700,000 0 0 0 809,000 Future Bond Issue - Water & Sewer 11,867,870 11,378,110 20,987,540 4,433,650 5,365,670 0 54,032,840 Subtotal Borrowing/Self Supporting Funds 12,517,870 11,378,110 21,687,540 4,433,650 5,365,670 0 55,382,840 INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS Lease Purchase - Garage 5,441,000 5,520,440 5,620,850 5,223,270 5,327,730 5,434,290 32,567,580 Lease Purchase - Administrative Services 405,000 405,000 405,000 410,000 410,000 500,000 2,535,000 Subtotal Borrowing/Internal Service Funds 5,846,000 5,925,440 6,025,850 5,633,270 5,737,730 5,934,290 35,102,580 TOTAL: ALL FUNDING SOURCES 69,963,350 95,094,060 77,087,300 55,579,990 64,341,060 44,021,870 406,087,630 Source: 2015 — 2016 Annual Operating Budget and Capital Improvement Budget 27 Ordinance No. 8805-16 Section 29. That the Capital Improvement Program Expenditure Summary by Function of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element, page 1-17, be repealed as replaced to read as follows: 28 Ordinance No. 8805-16 ..... ... ... .. ..... ... ..... ..... ... .... ... ... ..... ... .... ... ... .... . ... ... ... ... ...PRO... ... . ... ...... ... ... ... .... ...... ...... .... ... .... . . ..... -- --- . ... . .... ..... ..... -- --- -- ... .... --- . .... .... -- --- ..... ... --- .... -- --- . ...- .... -- --- . . _ ...... .. . -- --- . OTMA Iff .. .. ._ ._ 28 Ordinance No. 8805-16 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BY FUNCTION FY 2015/16 THROUGH FY 2020/21 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND CITY OF CLEARWATER Schedule of Planned Expenditures Function 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 Total Police Protection 200,000 3,305,000 0 0 0 0 3,505,000 Fire Protection 1,476,390 4,857,920 3,275,470 4,778,060 1,391,340 2,195,710 17,974,890 Major Street Maintenance 3,656,430 5,668,100 5,654,850 5,654,850 3,658,850 3,484,850 27,777,930 Sidewalk and Bike Trails 472,000 472,000 472,000 472,000 473,250 473,250 2,834,500 Intersections 335,000 335,000 331,990 315,410 315,400 315,390 1,948,190 Parkinq 2,389,000 19,482,500 381,000 382,500 384,000 384,000 23,403,000 Miscellaneous Engineering 935,000 535,000 35,000 35,000 2,460,000 35,000 4,035,000 Parks Development 6,735,000 5,037,000 3,564,840 3,325,000 7,125,000 1,440,000 27,226,840 Marine Facilities 410,000 385,000 390,000 390,000 390,000 390,000 2,355,000 Airpark Facilities 65,000 715,000 115,000 1,215,000 3,815,000 15,000 5,940,000 Libraries 115,580 387,350 27,340 462,720 35,000 0 1,027,990 Garage 5,639,400 5,700,160 5,702,960 5,307,850 5,414,840 5,524,020 33,289,230 Maintenance of Buildings 902,000 881,850 794,070 2,161,630 1,084,590 1,045,650 6,869,790 General Public Cit Building 110,000 522,800 4,646,630 985,650 10,289,100 0 16,554,180 Miscellaneous 2,125,000 5,995,000 1,625,000 1,630,000 1,955,000 2,045,000 15,375,000 Stormwater Utility 5,802,550 5,714,380 4,751,150 6,174,320 4,999,690 6,294,000 33,736,090 Gas System 6,211,000 4,050,000 13,850,000 4,050,000 4,050,000 4,050,000 36,261,000 Solid Waste & Recycling 625,000 635,000 635,000 635,000 635,000 635,000 3,800,000 Utilities Miscellaneous 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 120,000 Sewer System 24,469,000 23,260,000 16,260,000 11,400,000 10,200,000 10,150,000 95,739,000 Water System 7,270,000 7,135,000 14,555,000 6,185.000 5,645,000 5,525,000 46,315,000 69,963,350 95,094,060 77 087,300 55,579,990 64,341,060 44,021,870 406,087,630 Source: City of Clearwater Ordinance 8768-15, Exhibit B 29 Ordinance No. 8805-16 Section 30. Should any part or provision of this Ordinance be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the Ordinance as a whole, or any part thereof other than the part declared to be invalid. Section 31. This ordinance shall become effective when the Department of Economic Opportunity issues a final order determining the adopted amendment to be in compliance, or the Administration Commission issues a final order determining the adopted amendments to be in compliance, in accordance with Section 163.3184, F.S., as amended. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Approved as to form: George N. Cretekos Mayor Attest: Camilo Soto Rosemarie Call Assistant City Attorney City Clerk 30 Ordinance No. 8805-16 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD Clearwater . PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: December 15, 2015 AGENDA ITEM: F.1 CASE: CPA2015-04001 ORDINANCE NO.: 8805-16 REQUEST: Review and recommendation to the City Council, of amendments to the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan repealing transportation concurrency, establishing a Mobility Management System, allowing for non-contiguous annexations, amending certain provisions of the Capital Improvements Element for consistency with State Statutes, and updating various terms and references. INITIATED BY: City of Clearwater, Planning and Development Department BACKGROUND: The City of Clearwater Comprehensive Plan includes several policies addressing concurrency management in the Future Land Use, Transportation, Coastal Management, and Capital Improvements elements. The application of concurrency management requirements through the local site plan review process, including the assessment of transportation impact fees, is the primary tool the City and other municipalities in Pinellas County use to manage the traffic impacts of development projects. Concurrency management requirements are imposed to ensure that permits are not issued for a development project without the public facilities and services necessary to handle its impacts being in place. Concurrency management rules also require local governments to adopt level of service standards for public services and facilities that must be maintained as a condition of development approval. The City has adopted levels of service for transportation, solid waste, sanitary sewer, stormwater, potable water, hurricane evacuation, and parks. Most impact fees are established within the Code of Ordinances, but transportation impact fees are established by the Pinellas County Code Chapter 150-40 (the Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance, or TIFO), and are applied countywide. The 2011 Community Planning Act made substantial amendments to Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, including repealing state mandated transportation concurrency. To address these changes, the Pinellas County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) coordinated with the various local governments to develop an alternative approach to transportation concurrency which would also further the development of a countywide multi -modal transportation system that could better accommodate travel options other than the personal automobile. The Pinellas County Mobility Plan was approved by the MPO in 2013, and model policies were adopted in 2014. The Pinellas County Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) approved on first reading amendments to their impact fee ordinance, changing the name to Multi -Modal Impact Fee Ordinance and creating a Mobility Management System within its land development regulations, in October 2014. It is anticipated that the Pinellas County BOCC's amendments will be adopted on March 29, 2016. The City, along with municipalities throughout the County, is amending its Comprehensive Plan and land development regulations to remain consistent with the countywide approach to mobility management and the TIFO. o' 1 Clearwater CommunityDevelopment Code Text Amendment PLANNING &DEVELOPMENT p DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION The Mobility Management System that is envisioned through the new policies within this amendment would be a more flexible approach to manage the traffic impacts of development projects while increasing mobility for pedestrians, bicyclists, transit users and motor vehicles. The Mobility Management System, which is proposed to be established within the Community Development Code (see concurrent case TA2015-10006), will be a tiered development review approach requiring larger scale projects adding trips to the surrounding road network to implement transportation management strategies in -lieu of or as credit toward their impact fee assessment. These strategies could include, but are not limited to, trail, sidewalk, bus stop and intersection improvements or trip reduction programs such as carpooling or telecommuting. Smaller scale projects with limited impact on the transportation system would only be required to pay an impact fee commensurate with the number of new trips they generate. The main purpose of the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments is to repeal transportation concurrency and set up the policy framework necessary to establish a Mobility Management System, and to remove references to transportation concurrency throughout the Comprehensive Plan. Other amendments are proposed to recognize the 2014 Interlocal Service Boundary Agreement (ISBA) between Pinellas County and municipalities, which allows voluntary annexation of non-contiguous parcels located in an enclave surrounded by city property on all sides ("Type A" Enclaves). Additionally, the Coastal Management Element is updated to address new statutory requirements by adding policies that encourage new development to find solutions to help reduce the flood risk or flood losses and that require new development or redevelopment be consistent with or more stringent than Florida Building Code requirements. These policies add to existing policies addressing reduction of flood risk, as required by Chapter 163. Lastly, the proposed amendments include updates to the Capital Improvements Element. Many changes are minor, including updates to reflect the most recent studies and capital improvements programs established by the MPO, Florida Department of Transportation, and the City. The Schedule of Capital Improvements is being replaced to reflect the current five-year projections and updated Revenue Summary and Program Expenditure tables for Fiscal Years 2015-2020. ANALYSIS: Substantial changes are being made to the Transportation Element, including the addition of policies pertaining to the establishment of a Mobility Management System, and the removal of language pertaining to transportation concurrency. Amendments to the Future Land Use, Coastal Management, Intergovernmental Coordination, and Capital Improvements Elements include removing obsolete language, updating language to be consistent with the proposed Mobility Management System, and adding policies regarding noncontiguous annexations and flood risk and loss prevention as previously stated. Formatting changes are also being made to bring consistency among all of the elements. The proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan are summarized below: 1. Future Land Use Element [pages 2-4 of ordinance]: Simplifies the goal and objective for the Concurrency Management System; revises policies to remove transportation from concurrency requirements; updates the services for which levels of service have been adopted; adds review criteria for Future Land Use Map and/or Zoning Atlas amendments; and adds a policy to allow voluntary annexations of non-contiguous properties within "Type A" Enclaves. Community Development Board — December 15, 2015 CPA2015-04001 — Page 2 1 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT C earwater Community Development Code Text Amendment DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION 2. Transportation Element [pages 4-10 of ordinance]: Establishes the new Mobility Management System and related policies; adds a policy that includes transportation analysis for planning purposes; revises Objective B.1.2 and its policies to provide direction to use complete street policies when making improvements to the road network; removes references to transportation concurrency and replaces with references to the Mobility Management System; adds more policies regarding coordination with the MPO and FDOT; simplifies policies related to coordination with PSTA to identify public transit improvements; and updates various terms and plan years to most current editions. 3. Coastal Management Element [pages 10-11 of ordinance]: Removes reference to "traffic" as a required level of service objective and adds policies that aim to reduce flood risk and flood losses. 4. Intergovernmental Coordination Element [page 11 of ordinance]: Removes level of service requirement for road improvements; and adds a policy addressing coordination with FDOT with regards to access on State facilities for new development projects. 5. Capital Improvements Element [pages 11-28 of ordinance]: Removes the outdated Needs Summary; removes transportation from concurrency requirements and level of service requirements; adds reference to the Mobility Management System; updates the Schedule of Capital Improvements to the most recent five-year projections; updates the Revenue Summary and the Program Expenditures tables to the most recent five-year projections; and updates various terms and references. STANDARDS FOR REVIEW: Pursuant to Community Development Code Section 4-603.F., no amendment to the Comprehensive Plan shall be approved unless it complies with the following standards: 1. The amendment will further implementation of the Comprehensive Plan consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives contain in the plan. The proposed amendments to the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan are consistent with the following Objectives Policies in the Plan: Policy A.6.5.3 All proposed development/redevelopment initiatives shall be reviewed for opportunities to improve pedestrian and bicycle access and consider the integration of bicycle and pedestrian transportation modes in all phases of transportation planning, new roadway design, roadway construction, roadway resurfacing, and other capital projects consistent with the City's Shifting Gears Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan 2006. On Clearwater Beach, pedestrian and bicycle improvements should adhere to the policies and design guidelines set forth in Beach by Design: A preliminary Design for Clearwater Beach and Design Guidlelines. Community Development Board — December 15, 2015 CPA2015-04001 — Page 3 Clearwater Community Development Code Text Amendment PLANNING &DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION Objective A.6.8 Identify those areas of the City that are appropriate for redevelopment as livable communities and require that specific sustainable elements to be used in the redevelopment of these areas. Objective H.3.1 The City shall continue to work with the PPC, the State, and the County in the orderly annexation of the City's existing enclaves. The Mobility Management System proposed within new Objective 13.1.1 and its associated policies looks to improve the transportation network for all users, including pedestrians, bicyclists, and public transit. Proposed Objective 13.1.2 includes a policy that references Objective A.6.8, as well as other policies that further Objective A.6.8 related to Complete Streets, sidewalks, and other livable community improvements. The addition of voluntary non-contiguous "Type A" annexations allows those properties in "Type A" enclaves to not have to wait until they become contiguous to City limits to annex into the City. As such, the proposed amendments will further implementation of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. 2. The amendment is not inconsistent with other provisions of the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed amendments are not in conflict with other provisions of the Comprehensive Plan and bring further consistency between the goals, objectives, and policies and the map series. The proposed amendment will add several new objectives and policies to the Comprehensive Plan, while also simplifying other sections of the Plan. Proposed Objective B.1.1 and related policies expand the ways the city is addressing the impacts of new development on its transportation system that increases mobility for pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit users as well as for motorists. The new Mobility Management System objective and policies tie in with various Future Land Use Element policies, specifically the livable communities objective and policies which are captured in Objective A.6.8. Several proposed amendments address intergovernmental coordination between the City and other entities such as the MPO and PSTA. 3. The available uses, if applicable, to which the property may be put are appropriate to the property in question and compatible with existing and planned uses in the area. This is not applicable to the proposed amendments as they do not relate to a specific property or properties. 4. Sufficient public facilities are available to serve the property. The adequacy of available public facilities will need to be assessed on a case-by-case basis as development proposals are received. The proposed amendments repeal transportation concurrency, however, new policies are being created that will maintain level of service as a planning tool that will be used to evaluate potential development proposals at the time of site plan review. Therefore, this is not applicable as the proposed amendments do not relate to a specific property or properties. 5. The amendment will not adversely affect the natural environment. This is not applicable to the proposed amendments. The amendments reflect updates to the state statutes and to recently approved local ordinances. Any proposed development will have to comply with Community Development Board — December 15, 2015 CPA2015-04001— Page 4 kafwatef Community Development Code Text Amendment PLANNING& DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION impervious surface ratio standards, tree preservation and landscaping requirements, and drainage and water quality requirements, which is evaluated at the time of site plan review. 6. The amendment will not adversely impact the use of property in the immediate area. This is not applicable to the proposed amendments as they do not relate to a specific property or properties. Any impacts would be determined at the time of site plan review, and would need to be mitigated before any development can proceed. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The purpose of this amendment is to update the Future Land Use, Transportation, Intergovernmental Coordination, and Capital Improvements Elements to reflect changes to the state statutes; to establish an objective and policies for the Mobility Management System; and to recognize the 2014 Interlocal Service Boundary Agreement between the City, Pinellas County, and other municipalities, all of which have been adopted since the last major update to the Comprehensive Plan in 2008. The proposed amendment is consistent with and will further the goals, objectives, and policies of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan, will not result in inappropriate or incompatible uses, will not adversely affect the natural environment or impact the use of property in the immediate area, and sufficient public facilities exist to implement the proposed amendment. Based upon the above, the Planning and Development Department recommends APPROVAL of Ordinance No. 8805-16 that amends the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. t Prepared by Planning and Development Department Staff: Kyle Brotherton, Planner ATTACHMENTS: Resume Ordinance No. 8805-16 Community Development Board — December 15, 2015 CPA2015-04001 — Page 5 Revise the Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan CPA2015-04001 by amending Policy B.1.1.1, page 5 of ordinance, to read as follows: B.1.1.1 The City shall establish a Mobility Management System within the City's Community Development Code. Impacts of land development projects shall be managed through the application of Transportation Element policies, through requirements of the Community Development Code, and through the site plan review process. The Mobility Management System shall address the following: a. All development projects generating new peak hour trips shall be subject to payment of a multi -modal impact fee. b. Development projects that generate between 51 and 300 new �- peak hour trips of deficient roads shall be classified as tier 1 and required to submit a transportation management plan (TMP) designed to address their impacts while increasing mobility and reducing demand for single occupant vehicle travel. c. Development projects that generate more than 300 new peak hour trips on deficient roads shall be classified as tier 2, required to conduct a traffic impact study, and submit an accompanying report and TMP based on the report findings. d. Multi -modal impact fee assessments may be applied as credit toward the cost of a TMP. e. A traffic study and/or TMP for a development project not impacting a deficient road corridor shall be required if necessary to address the impact of additional trips generated by the project on the surrounding traffic circulation system. Revise the Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan CPA2015-04001 by amending Policy B.1.1.3, page 5 of ordinance, to read as follows: B.1.1.3 The GemmuRity DevelopmeRt Code Capital Improvements Element shall include the identification of "deficient" roadways, as identified through the annual Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Level of Service Report, including facilities operating at P4A-. peak hour level of service (LOS) E and F and/or volume -to -capacity (v/c) ratio 0.9 or greater without a mitigating improvement scheduled for construction within three years. 30 Ordinance No. 8805-16 ORDINANCE NO. 8805-16 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER (THE CITY), FLORIDA, AMENDING THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN BY AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT UPDATING THE CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND ALLOWING FOR NON-CONTIGUOUS ANNEXATIONS; BY AMENDING THE TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT ESTABLISHING A MOBILITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND REPEALING TRANSPORTATION CONCURRENCY, ESTABLISHING MULTI -MODAL DESIGN FEATURES, AND ENSURING THE CITY'S COORDINATION WITH THE METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION AND THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION; BY AMENDING THE COASTAL MANGEMENT ELEMENT BY REMOVING TRAFFIC FROM LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS AND ADDING POLICIES ENCOURAGING STRATEGIES AND ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS THAT REDUCE FLOOD RISK IN COASTAL AREAS; BY AMENDING THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT REMOVING REFERENCE TO ROAD LEVEL OF SERVICE; BY AMENDING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT REMOVING TRANSPORTATION LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS AND UPDATING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND EXPENDITURE AND REVENUE SUMMARIES; UPDATING VARIOUS TERMS AND REFERENCES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act of Florida empowers and requires the City Council of the City of Clearwater to plan for the future development and growth of the City, and to adopt and periodically amend the Comprehensive Plan, including elements and portions thereof; and WHEREAS, Florida House Bill 7207, also known as the Community Planning Act, was signed into law in 2011; and WHEREAS, the Community Planning Act removed State requirements for local government implementation of transportation concurrency management systems; and WHEREAS, the City of Clearwater participated in a multi jurisdictional Mobility Plan Task Force, facilitated by the Pinellas County Metropolitan Planning Organization, to develop a framework for a countywide approach to implementation of a mobility management system in place of transportation concurrency; and WHEREAS, the City of Clearwater desires to replace transportation concurrency with a mobility management system approach that is multi -modal, and designed to better support redevelopment and associated transportation, land use, intergovernmental, and capital improvement goals; and WHEREAS, additional amendments are proposed to address an Interlocal Service Boundary Agreement (ISBA) the city and Pinellas County entered into which allows voluntary annexations of noncontiguous properties within "Type A" enclaves, as defined in the ISBA; and WHEREAS, such ISBA should be recognized in the Comprehensive Plan; and Ordinance No. 8805-16 WHEREAS, the City Council finds it necessary, desirable and proper to adopt the amendments to the objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan in order to reflect changing conditions; now, therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. That Policy A.2.2.6 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Element, page A-10, be amended to read as follows: A.2.2.6 The Community Development Code shall provide for safe on-site traffic circulation and connections to adjacent arterial and collector streets consistent with Florida Department of Transportation-and,_lnstitute of Traffic Engineers design guidelines, and other applicable roadway design standards, policies, and guidelines. Section 2. That Goal A.4 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Element, and its Objective and Policies, pages A-11 through A-12, be amended to read as follows: A.4 GOAL - THE CITY SHALL NOT PERMIT DEVC1 OCMENT 40 OCCUR UNLESS CCC AAI ADEQUATE LEVEL OF SERVICE ISAVAILAB1 C TO ACCOMMODATE THE IMPA�`TC OF DEVELOPMENT. AREAS IN W141CH THE IMPACT- A1C EXISTING DEVELOPM€NT CYf`CCDS THE DESIRED LEVELS C A1C SERVICE WII 1 BE UPGRADED CONSIST -ENT WIT�ETARQET DATES FOR IAIIFI ACTRUCTI ICC IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDED DED IN THE APPLICABLE C CI NCTIONAI PLAN CI MENT:1:ORK TOWARD A LAND USE PATTERN THAT CAN BE SUPPORTED BY THE AVAILABLE COMMUNITY AND PUBLIC FACILITIES THAT WOULD BE REQUIRED TO SERVE THE DEVELOPMENT. A.4.1 Objective - shall PFGV*de data on sub seGtem of the City in whiGh seR.Fin-e- de-fin-genGles exist whaGh seFvwGes aFe ad ' ' ' �Fve existing and planned new development. This level of se pe st—atus will 11 be GensideFed and made paFt of the staff FeGemmendation at the tome of zening, site plan, AP plat .,....., val. The -level ofserviGe Fnentefing eapaeity. The City's Concurrency Management System will ensure the compatibility of all proposed development with the capacities of the existing and planned support facilities for which a level of service has been adopted. Should -a requested development peFM*t Fesult in appFevals whirh would bUFden sew*Ge systems above adopted levels, peffniSS on to PFOGeed with the development wall not be gFanted until the City has assWed t M be available GORGUFFent with the impaGts of development. Policies A.4.1.1 Ale ne.Ai development OF redevelopment will he permuted whish r-'auses the level ^A riVfty seFViGes (Fends, reGFe �tien and open--spz.Ge, watererew a #eatmer�t-, qaFbage G9IleGti9A, and- d-rainage) to fall below minimum aGGeptable levels. HeweveF, development orders may be pha6ed OF otheFwase modified GGnsisteRt Ordinance No. 8805-16 The Concurrency Management System shall ensure proposed development is in conformance with existing and planned support facilities for which a level of service standard has been adopted and that such facilities and services are available, at the adopted level of service standards, concurrent with the impacts of development. A.4.1.2 The City's Concurrency Management System shall include, at minimum, level of service standards for parkland, potable water, sanitary sewer, solid waste, and stormwater. A.4.1.3 The City, when making decisions on requests to amend the Future Land Use Map or the Zoning Atlas (other than decisions on appropriate locations for mixed-use or transit oriented development), shall review the potential impact on the transportation system by considering the following_ a. Abilitv of the surroundina existina and planned transportation network to meet the mobility objectives of the Comprehensive Plan: b. Capacity of the surrounding existing and planned transportation network to accommodate any projected additional demand: and c. Extent to which the proposed Future Land Use Map amendment or rezoninq furthers the intent of the Comprehensive Plan to improve mobility. A.4.124 The City shall recognize the overriding Constitutional principle that private property shall not be taken without due process of law and the payment of just compensation, which principle is restated in Section 163.3194 (4) (a), Florida Statutes. Section 3. That Policy A.5.4.8 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Element, page A-14, be amended to read as follows: A.5.4.8 Study the establishment Of tFanspeFtati9R GenGUFFenGy alteFRatives Use the City's Mobility Management System, as established in the City's Community Development Code, to support higher densities along redevelopment corridors and in activity centers. Section 4. That Policy A.7.1.2 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Element, page A-24, be amended to read as follows: A.7.1.2 When evaluating and prioritizing areas to annex, consideration should be given to the following: • Whether property was given high priority in the City's Sewer System Expansion Feasibility Study Update completed in 2002 2011; Ordinance No. 8805-16 Section 5. That a new Policy A.7.2.4 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Element, page A-25, be added, with subsequent Policies renumbered, and that Policy A.7.2.6, as renumbered, be amended to fix a typographical error: A.7.2.4 Allow voluntary annexations for noncontiguous properties that are within an enclave as defined by Section 171.032(13)(a), Florida Statutes ("Type A" enclaves). A.7.2.45 Promote economic development programs and activities to businesses within the unincorporated areas of the Clearwater Planning Area. A.7.2.56 Continue to work with property owners and Pinellas County to permit development activities in the County prior to the effective date of annexation provided the proposed development complies with the provisions of the City of Clearwater Development Code. Section 6. That the Transportation Needs Summary section of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element, page B-1, be amended to read as follows: Traffic Circulation & Mobility Multi -modal transportation improvements to Clearwater Beach should continue to be planned and/or utilized to alleviate traffic congestion and parking demands on the Memorial Causeway and the beach. Access management to improve traffic flow will continue to be an important issue in development reviews, with particular emphasis on congested links. Belleair Road (CR462) and Clearwater Memorial Causeway (SR60) are physically and/or, environmentally constrained and Will GGRtinue to epeFate below the aGGeptable levels of The City will continue to work with Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), Tampa Bay Area Regional Transportation Authority (TBARTA), Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority (PSTA) and other agencies to speFtation alternatives and demand managemeRt.- create and maintain a multi -modal transportation system that is safe and efficient for all users, including bicyclists, pedestrians and transit users, as well as motorists. 4 Ordinance No. 8805-16 Section 7. That the Traffic Circulation section of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element, page B-3, be renamed as follows: TRAFFIC CIRCULATION MOBILITY Section 8. That Goal B.1 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element, page B-3, be amended and a new Objective B.1.1 and its Policies be added to read as follows, with subsequent Objectives and Policies renumbered: B.1 GOAL - THE TRAFFIC GIRD ii AT1/1A1 SYSTEMA THE CITY SHALL PROVIDE FOR THE A SAFE,_CONVENIENT AND ENERGY EFFICIENT DELIVERY OF PEOPLE AND GOODS BY A MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM THAT SERVES TO INCREASE MOBILITY, EFFICIENTLY UTILIZE ROADWAY CAPACITY, REDUCE THE INCIDENCE OF SINGLE -OCCUPANT VEHICLE TRAVEL, REDUCE THE CONTRIBUTION TO AIR POLLUTION FROM MOTOR VEHICLES, AND IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF LIFE TO THE CITIZENS OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER. B.1.1 Objective — Maintain the major road network performance within the City while furthering development of a multi -modal transportation system that increases mobility for pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit users as well as for motorists. Policies B.1.1.1 The Citv shall establish a Mobilitv Manaaement Svstem within the Citv's Communi Development Code. Impacts of land development proiects shall be managed through the application of Transportation Element policies, through requirements of the Community Development Code, and through the site plan review process. The Mobility Management System shall address the following: a. All development proiects generating new peak hour trips shall be subject to payment of a multi -modal impact fee. b. Development proiects that generate between 51 and 300 new peak hour trips of deficient roads shall be classified as tier 1 and required to submit a transportation management plan (TMP) designed to address their impacts while increasing mobility and reducing demand for single occupant vehicle travel. c. Development projects that generate more than 300 new peak hour trips on deficient roads shall be classified as tier 2, required to conduct a traffic impact study, and submit an accompanying report and TMP based on the report findings. d. Multi -modal impact fee assessments may be applied as credit toward the cost of a TMP. e. A traffic study and/or TMP for a development project not impacting a deficient road corridor shall be required if necessary to address the impact of additional trips -generated by the project on the surrounding traffic circulation system. B.1.1.2 The City shall continue to use roadway levels of service for planning purposes. B.1.1.3 The Communitv Development Code shall include the identification of "deficient" roadways, as identified through the annual Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Level of Service Report, including facilities operating at peak hour level of service (LOS) E and F and/or volume -to -capacity (v/c) ratio 0.9 or greater without a mitigating improvement scheduled for construction within three years. Ordinance No. 8805-16 B.1.1.4 The City shall utilize multi -modal impact fee revenue to fund multi -modal improvements to local, county, or state facilities that are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan as well as the MPO Long Range Transportation Plan 2040. 8.1.1.5 The City shall work cooperatively with the MPO and other local governments to complete the biennial update of the Multi -modal Impact Fee Ordinance through the MPO planning process. B.1.1..6 The City shall continue to work with the Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority (PSTA) to increase the efficiency of the fixed -route system by encouraging mass transit use through the application of the Mobility Management System and the City's site plan review process. Section 9. That Objective B.1.2 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element, as renumbered by this ordinance, page B-3, and its Policies be amended, and Policies B.1.2.3 through B.1.2.8 be added to read as follows, with subsequent Objectives and Policies renumbered: B.1.42 Objective — . Future improvements to arterial and collector streets shall be context -sensitive by planning and designing the roadway based on the existing context of the surrounding built environment and the planned land use vision. 8.1.42.1 The City shall continue to administer access management and right-of-way requirements through the Community Development Code. 6.1.42.2 The City will promote programs that ensure physical safety of non -motorized transportation users in accordance with the City's Shifting Gears: Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan. B.1.2.3 The Citv will operate, maintain. and improve the Citv transportation system consistent with the Florida Department of Transportation's (FDOT) Complete Streets Policy. B.1.2.4 The City shall coordinate efforts with FDOT to incorporate bicycle and pedestrian - friendly provisions in the design and construction of expansion and resurfacing projects on State roads, where feasible. B.1.2.5 The City shall require land development projects to make adequate provisions for bicycle parking and storage as appropriate. B.1.2.6 The City shall include sidewalks where feasible alongside roadways scheduled for resurfacing. B.1.2.7 The City shall install landscaping along sidewalks using tree canopy, where feasible, to provide shaded areas for pedestrians. B.1.2.8 The City shall incorporate livable community requirements such as Obiective A.6.8 and its Policies to proposed developments or redevelopments. Ordinance No. 8805-16 Section 10. That Objective B.1.3 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element, pages B-3 and B-4, and its Policies be amended as follows: B.1.34 Objective - The City will continue to monitor traffic counts, accidents, and road improvements, to provide timely status evaluation of level of service conditions Policies B.1.34.1 Requests fGF amendmeRt te the Futwe Land Use Map will have an analysis Of tFafft +masts. The City shall continue to review potential trips generated by Future Land Use Map amendments and Zoning Atlas Amendments based upon the Mobility Management System. 6.1.34.32 The seesUFFeeEy Mobilily mManagement system will be PRhARAed applied through improved departmental coordination_ Section 11. That Policies B.1.4.1 through B.1.4.7 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element, pages B-4 and B-5, be amended to read as follows: Policies 8.1.45.1 The City shall continue to review trips generated by land development projects through the Mobility Management System. B.1.45.2 For those roads which are not currently operating at an acceptable LOS, or which do not have PFGgFaFnFned to upgFade seFYiGe tG an aeGeptable level a mitigating improvement scheduled for construction within three years, the ser►sufrenGy Mobility +;Management sSystem shall be used to monitor traffic growth, with the dual intent of maintaining average operating speeds and restricting the aggregate and individual trips generated by development in the City limits. Ordinance No. 8805-16 1.45.53 Redevelopment and/or revitalization projects shall be coordinated with the FDOT and the DepaFtFneRt of Gammunity AffaiFs Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO) to assess impacts on US 19. 6.1.45.74 The City shall cooperate with the MPO to ensure consistency between comprehensive plan amendments and the Pinellas MPO Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) 242-5 2040. Section 12. That Objective B.1.5 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element, page B-5, and its Policies be deleted: Ordinance No. 8805-16 Section 13. That Objective B.2.1 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element, page B-6, be amended, and Policies 6.2.1.2 and 6.2.1.3 be added to read as follows: B.2.1 Objective - Roadway improvements to obtain desiFed Levelsofbe included in State, County, and City capital budgets. The City shall actively participate, on a continuing basis, with both the staff and elected official support, in the preparation, adoption and implementation of transportation plans and expenditure programs of the MAG. MPO, P.ST..A. PSTA, Board of County Commissioners, and the F4) -.G -.T FDOT. B.2.1.1 The City shall review and comment on the proposed capital improvement programs and provide input to the adopting agencies relative to consistency with Clearwater's Comprehensive Plan. 13.2.1.2 The City shall provide the MPO with available up-to-date traffic data, such as signal timings and traffic counts to assist with level -of -service monitoring and development of the MPO's Long Range Transportation Plan. 13.2.1.3 The Cify shall continue to l2articipate with the MPO and/or its Technical Coordinating Committee (TCC) to ensure that the level of service standards for US Highway 19, a Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) facility, is consistent with FDOT's LOS designation of D for this road. Section 14. That Objective 13.2.3 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element, page B-8, be amended, and that Policy B.2.3.2 be deleted as follows: B.2.3 Objective - The City of Clearwater shall aRRually update the Gilty's end coordinate with and provide input in the update of the Metropolitan Planning Organization's (MPO) Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) involving County and State roads. The following UaMpeFtatien pFejeGts that will Policies Ordinance No. 8805-16 B.2.3.1 Road improvements which are currently programmed for construction should be continued in the Capital Improvement Element of the jurisdiction having operational responsibility for those roads. Section 15. That Objective B.4.4 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element, page B-14, and Policies 8.4.4.1 and 13.4.4.2 be amended to read as follows: B.4.4 Objective — The City:shall participate and cooperate with agencies and committees to enhance and promote the use ass t ansit public transportation system. 8.4.4.1 Clearwater shall coordinate with PSTA and the MPO in the development of the Five -Year Transit Development P-regram-Plan to addFeS +guidelines identify and include transit improvements that benefit the City. B.4.4.2 Clearwater will cooperate with PSTA and the MPO to oroion of the Long Range Mass T-FaRsit DIaRs identify transit improvements that could be incorporated as part of corridor plans or development projects. Section 16. That Objective E.1.5 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Coastal Management Element, page E-5, be amended to read as follows: E.1.5 Objective - Ltevel of service standards as defined in the functional elements of the Comprehensive Plan (tFaffiG, public utilities, recreation and open space), are established and are recognized as applicable to the coastal stone area. -- Section 17. That Objective E.1.6 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Coastal Management Element, page E-5, be amended to read as follows, and that new Policies E.1.6.2 and E.1.6.3 be added to read as follows, with subsequent Policies renumbered: E.1.6 Objective - Development and Rredevelopment areas established in the coastal storm area should address the needs and opportunities unique to those locations. E.1.6.1 Redevelopment proposals and plans shall be reviewed for compliance with the goals, objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan and other appropriate plans including Beach by Design: A Preliminary Design for Clearwater Beach and Design Guidelines and the City's NFIP Community Rating System Floodplain Management Plan. E.1.6.2 New development or redevelopment is encouraged to include principles, strategies, or engineering solutions that: a. reduce the flood risk in the coastal areas which results from high -tide events storm surge, flash floods, stormwater runoff, and the related impacts of sea -level rise; b. may reduce losses due to floodina and claims made under flood insurance olicies issued in this state. 10 Ordinance No. 8805-16 E.1.6.3 New development or redevelopment shall be consistent with, or more stringent than, the flood -resistant construction requirements in the Florida Building Code and applicable flood plain management regulations set forth in 44 C.F.R. part 60. Section 18. That the Intergovernmental Coordination Needs Summary of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Intergovernmental Coordination Element, page H-1, be amended to read as follows: Intergovernmental Coordination Needs Summary The following summarizes the Intergovernmental Coordination Element: Road improvements, and backlogged facilities, need the coordination of all jurisdictions along the corridor in establishing and maintaining appropriate land use and traffic policies. Coordination with the Florida Department of Transportation(FDOT) is also a major issue to be addressed by continued participation in the M..P-O- process. In addition, Clearwater should continue to be involved with the Tampa Bay Area Regional Transportation Authority (TBARTA) planning process. Section 19. That Objective H.2.2 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Intergovernmental Coordination Element, page H-4, and its Policies be amended, and Policy H.2.2.3 be added to read as follows: H.2.2 Objective - The City shall adopt the F.D.G.T: MOT level of ^A^•'^^ standards for State primary and secondary arterials as they may be modified by additional service designations (special transportation areas, etc.) approved by F.D.G..T. MOT and shall use intergovernmental coordination agreements to secure maximum City control over access and management of roads in Clearwater. Policies H.2.2.1 The City shall continue to cooperate with €.D.0 -T. FDOT in all matters of traffic signal access requests that affect the State highway system. H.2.2.2 Clearwater shall provide F.D.G.T. FDOT with annual reports that document efforts at concurrency management on State roads. H.2.2.3 The City will consult with FDOT with regard to the access onto State facilities for new land development projects. Section 20. That the Capital Improvements Element Needs Summary of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element, page 1-1, be deleted as follows: 11 Ordinance No. 8805-16 Section 21. That Objective 1.1.1 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element, page 1-2, and Policies 1.1.1.2, 1.1.1.5, 1.1.1.9, 1.1.1.11, and 1.1.1.12 be amended to read as follows: 1.1.1 Objective — The Capital Improvements Element (CIE) of the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Clearwater shall be reviewed and adopted annually in light of the needs addressed in various elements of the Comprehensive Plan including the fifth year needs of earh subsequent adeption. 1.1.1.2 The Aannual Jlupdate to the Five -Year Schedule of Capital Improvements Oapitaal %meRts Ele..,�..+ is hereby incorporated by reference and is located following pPolicy 1.1.6.3. 1.1.1.5 Capital improvements projects proposed for inclusion in the schedule of capital improvements should be evaluated on the following criteria and considered in the priority listed below: 1.1.1.9 As stated in the City Charter, the total indebtedness of the City of Clearwater, which for the purpose of this limitation shall include revenue, refunding and improvement bonds, shall not exceed twenty percent (20%) of the current assessed valuation of all real property located in the Citye. Ttotal budgeted expenditures in any fiscal year shall not exceed the total estimated revenue plus any unencumbered funds carried forward from a prior fiscal year. 12 Ordinance No. 8805-16 1.1.1.11 , 20 The City will coordinate with the FDOT and the Pinellas County MPO to promote the inclusion of projects in the plans and programs of these agencies into the Five -Year Schedule of Capital Improvements. Section 22. That Policy 1.1.3.1 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element, page 1-5, be amended to read as follows: 1.1.3.1 Essential public facilities as defined in this plan include and are limited to those facilities relating to sanitary sewer, solid waste, stormwater, potable water, #anspeFtatien, and parks and recreation systems. Section 23. That Policy 1.1.3.3 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element, page 1-5, be amended to read as follows: 1.1.3.3 If it is determined that sufficient capacity of essential public facilities will be available concurrent with the impacts of a proposed development, a final development order may be issued in accordance with the following schedule: Section 24. That Table: Summary of Level of Service Standards in Policy 1.1.3.7 Capital Improvements Element, of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan, page 1-7, be amended to read as follows: Table: Summary of Level of Service Standards Facilities Element LOS Standard TFanspeFtatiee Sanitary Sewer Utilities Average of 127gallons per person per day GPCD Solid Waste Utilities Average Solid Waste Generator Rate of 7.12 pounds per capita per da Stormwater Utilities Design storm: 10 — year storm frequency for all new street development using the rational design method 25 — year frequency with positive outfall for major storm systems with basin time of intensities controlling the duration.* 50 — year storm frequency when no outfall and discharge is to street right-of-way.* 13 Ordinance No. 8805-16 Section 25. That a new Policy 1.1.4.8 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element, page 1-8, be added to read as follows: Policies 1.1.4.8 The City will continue to use roadway level of service for planning purposes. Section.26. That Policy 1.1.5.1 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element, page 1-8, be deleted as follows, and that Policy 1.1.5.4, page 1-9, be amended to read as follows, with Policies renumbered: Policies 1.1.5.21 The City shall recognize the overriding Constitutional principle that private property shall not be taken without due process of law and the payment of just compensation, which principle is restated in Section 163.3194 (4) (a) Florida Statutes. 14 Ordinance No. 8805-16 100 — year storm frequency when no outfall and discharge is across private property.* * Design standards for stormwater quality treatment/storage quantity shall conform to the current SWFWMD requirement [Presently being the SCS Unit Hydrograph design method, using the design storm frequency and a twenty-four (24) hour duration for sites ten (10) acres or more, and the rational design method for sites under ten 10 acres]. Potable Water Utilities Average Water Consumption Rate and Natural 120 gallons per capita per day at a pressure of Ground Water 40-45 psi.* Aquifer *Continue to maintain water consumption of Recharge one hundred twenty (120) GPCPD or less as per the conditions set forth by Clearwater's Water Use Permit. Hurricane Coastal 16 hours (out of county for a category 5 -storm Evacuation Management event as measured on the Saffir-Simpson scale Parks Recreation 4 acres of parkland per one thousand (1,000) and Open persons for Citywide application Space Section 25. That a new Policy 1.1.4.8 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element, page 1-8, be added to read as follows: Policies 1.1.4.8 The City will continue to use roadway level of service for planning purposes. Section.26. That Policy 1.1.5.1 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element, page 1-8, be deleted as follows, and that Policy 1.1.5.4, page 1-9, be amended to read as follows, with Policies renumbered: Policies 1.1.5.21 The City shall recognize the overriding Constitutional principle that private property shall not be taken without due process of law and the payment of just compensation, which principle is restated in Section 163.3194 (4) (a) Florida Statutes. 14 Ordinance No. 8805-16 1.1.5.32 In the planning of capital improvements, the City shall consider the effect of such improvement on local resources listed on the National Register of Historic Places with the intent to preserve the integrity of such places. 1.1.5.43 In the planning of capital improvements, the City shall consider the effects of controversial public facilities, such as landfills, prisons, and power lines, with the intent of locating them in areas where they may best serve their purpose and have the fewest negative impacts. 1.1.5.54 The City will require dev '�Fs development to ;..,. aGt ♦hFeGheld has been Fnet. be consistent with the provisions of the Mobility Management System established in Goal B.1 of the Transportation Element. Section 27. That the Annual Update to the Capital Improvements Element of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element, page 1-10 through 1-14, be amended to read as follows: FY20105/14-6 ANNUAL UPDATE TO THE SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT In the following, the concurrency -related public facilities (i.e., solid waste, potable water, stormwater, sanitary sewer; and parkland and -Feads) are evaluated to determine that the City's adopted level of service (LOS) standards are currently being met and will be adequate to serve approved and planned development over the next five years. The adopted Clearwater Capital Improvement Program, FY201 Oil 1--FY2015-16 — FY2019/20 indicates the timing, location and funding of capital projects needed to meet future public facilities' demands and demonstrate that the Comprehensive Plan is financially feasible. Current populations (2 -ON 2015 estimate): 110,831 110.679 Projected 2018 populations (per Future Land use Element): 120,028 SOLID WASTE: Current Capacity: 7.12 lbs per capita per day Current demand: 54-9 4.89 lbs per capita per day Fiscal Year Projected Projected Surplus Demand (Ibs per Capacity (Ibs per Deficit ca ita Der da ca ita er da 2015/16 4.89 7.12 2.23 2016/17 4.89 7.12 2.23 15 Ordinance No. 8805-16 m Orrrrrm.-Ty 112 ILL:2 go Fiscal Year Projected Projected Surplus Demand (Ibs per Capacity (Ibs per Deficit ca ita Der da ca ita er da 2015/16 4.89 7.12 2.23 2016/17 4.89 7.12 2.23 15 Ordinance No. 8805-16 2017/18 4.89 7.12 2.23 2018/19 4.89 7.12 2.23 2019/20 4.89 .7.12 2.23 Totals (2QI9/201 4.89 7.12 2.23 Total solid waste generated by the City in 2008 (in tons): 104,898 Current pounds of solid waste per capita per day: 64-94.89 "The current capacity is based on the City's solid waste LOS standard. Capacity is actually greater since the City's Solid Waste Department is able to dispose of all waste produced within the City, as it coordinates with Pinellas County and other private facilities and vendors for waste disposal. The majority (80-85%) of all sSolid waste is disposed of at the Pinellas County Solid Waste to Energy Plant where most is incinerated and any remaining material is landfilled. According to the Pinellas County Technical Management Committee, the most recent projections take the life of the county landfill to year 2065. POTABLE WATER: Current capacity: 25 23.5 MGD Current demand: 42:2 11.4 MGD Fiscal Year Proiected Demand Maximum Projected Ca aci Minimum Surplus Deficit 2015/16 11.4 20.75 9.36 2016/17 11.4 20.75 9.36 2017/18 11.5 20.75 9.35 2018/19 11.5 20.75 9.35 2019/20 11.6 20.75 9.34 Totals (2Qla/201 11.6 1 20.75 12.34 MGD = million gallons per day; Projections as per the City's Water Master Plan. Potable water LOS standard: 120 gallons per capita per day Current capacity: Total potable water available per day in gallons: 2600,000 23.500,000 (25:8 23.5 MGD) Gallons available -per-capita perch,: 225.56 Current demand: 16 Ordinance No. 8805-16 Total potable water consumption per day in gallons: 42,000,000 11,400.000 (42-0 11.4 MGD) Gallnnc. nuns umed peF Gapita peF day-. 1-08.27 STORMWATER: Fe a EL rn. .E L,. Stormwater LOS Standard: No adverse impacts to existing floodplain elevations and no increase in stormwater flow rate leaving a site. Notes: 1. The City of Clearwater Drainage Design Criteria was updated in September 2015 which specifies the design storms for new development in the City. Design Storm 10 -[ear storm frequency for all new developments for street drainage, storm systems, and culverts 25 -year storm frequency for all new developments for channels and detention areas with outfalls 50 -year storm frequency for all new developments for detention areas without outfalls 100 -year storm frequency for all new developments for detention areas without outfalls which overflow onto private 12ropedy when capacily is exceeded Design standards for stormwater quality treatment/storage quantity shall conform to the current SWFWMD requirement (Presently being the SCS Unit Hydrograph design method, using the design storm frequency and a twenty-four (24) hour duration for sites ten (10) acres or more, and the rational design method for sites under ten (10) acres . 17 Ordinance No. 8805-16 2. Development plans are reviewed for stormwater on a permit -by -permit basis. The City only approves a development if it meets the LOS standards per the City's design criteria. 3. Major watersheds within the City Limits with Watershed Master Plans are Alligator Creek, Allen's Creek, and Stevenson Creek. The City also includes Coastal Zones 1-4 , the Beach Zone and to a lesser extent, Curlew Creek, Possum Creek, Bishop Creek, and Mullet Creek. 4. In establishing Capital Improvement Projects for City proiects, projects are determined through the number of structures removed from the 100 -year floodplain and improvements in roadway level of service with consideration for regional needs and cost benefit. SANITARY SEWER: Current capacity: 257 gallons per capita per day Current demand: 427 113 gallons per capita per day Fiscal Year Projected Projected Surplus Demand Capacity (Deficit) Maximum Minimum 0 2015/16 44-4112.5 MGD 28.5 MGD 44-4 16.0 MGD 2010111 2016/17 44.2 12.5 MGD 28.5 MGD 443 16.0 MGD 2011 M 2 2017/18 444 12.5 MGD 28.5 MGD 444 16.0 MGD 2012113 2018/19 4473 12.5 MGD 28.5 MGD 444 16.0 MGD 29401442019/20 44:312.6 MGD 28.5 MGD 44.-2 15.9 MGD Totals (281314 14.3 MGD 1 28.5 MGD 44.2 15.9 221201 MGD MGD = million gallons per day; Projections as per the City's Water Pollution Control (WPC) Master Plan. Sanitary sewer LOS standard: Current capacity (in gallons): Gallons available per capita per day Current demand: Gallons available per capita per day PARKLAND: 127 gallons per capita per day 28,500,000 244 257.50 14,100,009 12,500,000 427 22 112.94 Current parkland acres: 1,711 Current parkland acres per 1,000 persons: 15.46 Minimum parkland acres to meet adopted LOS: 442.72 Fiscal Year PFejest Projected Surplus Demand Adopted Capacity (Deficit) Level of Service (dna) 18 Ordinance No. 8805-16 2909/9 2015/16 4 per 1,000 13.31 15.46 per 944- 11.46 per 1,000 1,000 201011 1 2016/17 4 per 1,000 13.31- 15.46 per 9-34- 11.46 per 1,000 1,000 28112 2017/18 4 per 1,000 43.31 15.46 per 94-1. 11.46 per 1,000 1,000 2012113 2018/19 4 per 1,000 13.31 15.46 per 9-.34- 11.46 per 1,000 1,000 2013/44 2019/20 4 per 1,000 13.31 15.46 per 934 11.46 per zmn - 1,000 1,000 Totals 4 per 1,000 13.34 15.46 per 9-.34 11.46 per oo�a�i 1,000 1,000 • Note: Parkland is calculated using parklands that are within City boundaries that are owned and/or operated by the City. s 4,000 Pe.GGRG ROADS: Roadway LOS standard: C Average Daily, D Peak Hour Arterial and collector roadways currently operating below the adopted peak hour LOS standard include: 19 Ordinance No. 8805-16 v - = oo�ao 000�o zmn - M.M. - oo�a�i oo�aoAT 19 Ordinance No. 8805-16 Notes: 1. CR – County road; CL – City of Clearwater; SR – State road. 2. Policy constrained roadway per the 2925 2040 Pinellas County Long Range Transportation Plan. 3. Related capacity improvement identified in the Pinellas County Transportation Improvement Program, FY 2910 2015/16 – FY 2845 2019/20. 4. Related capacity improvement identified in the Florida Department of Transportation Five - Year Work Program, FY 2011 2045 2015-2020. 5. 2026 2035 !eye' of GtiGAS to LOS D. Source: Facility Level of Service Analysis, Pinellas County MPO, 2899 2015 Arterial and collector roadways projected to operate below the adopted LOS standard in 2925 2035 are listed below. Note: The Pinellas MPO does not calculate interim year LOS projections (e.g., 2015), therefore, 2925 2035 data is used. Volume/ Capacity dtis� dead Road Length 2026 Level T emi Ratio # Roadway Segment Juris' LOS 504 Belleair Rd (Keene Rd to US 19)2 CR 2U 1.969 1.042 F 565 Court St (Missouri Ave to Highland SR 4D 0.755 0.978 E Ave 568 Courtney Campbell Cswy SR 4D 5.235 1.143 F — Hillborou h CL to Ba shore Blvd — – 683 Ft Harrison Ave (Belleair Rd to CL 2D 1.551 1.195 F — Chestnut St - — — – 684 Ft Harrison Ave (Chestnut St to CL 2D 0.498 1.05 F — Drew St — — 857 McMullen Booth Rd (Gulf to Bay CR 6D 2.267 1.315 F — Blvd to Sunset Point Rd — — – McMullen Booth Rd (Sunset Point 858 — CR — 6D — 2.233 1.315 F – Road to SR 580 McMullen Booth Rd (SR 580 to 859 — Curlew Rd CR — 6D — 1.768 0.964 F – 867 Memorial Causeway (Clwtr Beach SR 4D 0447 0.964 E Roundabout to Island Way)— — — – 1099 US 19 (SR 580 to Curlew Rd) SR 6D 2.035 1.475 F3, a Notes: 1. CR – County road; CL – City of Clearwater; SR – State road. 2. Policy constrained roadway per the 2925 2040 Pinellas County Long Range Transportation Plan. 3. Related capacity improvement identified in the Pinellas County Transportation Improvement Program, FY 2910 2015/16 – FY 2845 2019/20. 4. Related capacity improvement identified in the Florida Department of Transportation Five - Year Work Program, FY 2011 2045 2015-2020. 5. 2026 2035 !eye' of GtiGAS to LOS D. Source: Facility Level of Service Analysis, Pinellas County MPO, 2899 2015 Arterial and collector roadways projected to operate below the adopted LOS standard in 2925 2035 are listed below. Note: The Pinellas MPO does not calculate interim year LOS projections (e.g., 2015), therefore, 2925 2035 data is used. 20 Ordinance No. 8805-16 Yea -r- # dtis� dead Leek 21 2026 Level 515 US 41+ 4 D/Crinc+wn4nr /Mvhle to BFeadway SR 2-U2.091 24712 i= 20 Ordinance No. 8805-16 M ME RM N mm -w NET - 0 - • ' - - 000 I ��Wwmm= MILL - NO 21 Ordinance No. 8805-16 # Roadway Segment Juris' Road Length AADT2 LOS Type mi 573 - Belcher Rd (Gulf to Bay Blvd to NE Coachman Rd CR 4E 0.805 33,361 F 574 - Belcher Rd (NE Coachman Rd to Sunset Point Rd CR 4D 1.237 40,000 F 581 Belleair Rd (US 19 to Keene RdZ CR 2E 1.969 16,743 F 582 Belleair Rd (Keene Rd to Missouri Ave) CR 2U 1.523 13,333 F 583 Belleair Rd (Missouri Ave to MLK Jr. Ave CR 2U 0.252 11.000 E 650 Countryside Blvd (Belcher Rd to US 19) CL 4D 0.538 32,500 E 657 Court St (Missouri Ave to Highland Ave) SR 4D 0.755 35.334 F 660 - Courtney Campbell Cswy (Hillsborough SR 4D - 5.235 68,000 F - CL to Ba shore Blvd)- 727 Druid Rd (US 19 to Belcher Rd) CL 2D 1.09 12,500 E 728 Druid Rd (Belcher Rd to Keene Rd) CL 2U 1.007 11,000 E 729 Druid Rd (Keene Rd to Highland Ave) CL 2U 0.774 12,163 F 785 - Ft Harrison Ave (Belleair Rd to Chestnut St CL 2D 1.551 25,167 F 786 Ft Harrison Ave (Chestnut St to Drew CL 2D 0.498 24.234 F St 827 Gulf to Bay Blvd (Bayshore Blvd to US SR 6D 1.512 66.960 F 191 828Gulf to Bay Blvd (US 19 to Belcher Rd) SR 6D 0.986 67.500 F 830 - Gulf to Bay Blvd (Highland Ave to Keene Rd SR 6D 0.756 60,999 F 831. Gulf to Bay Blvd (Keene Rd to Belcher SR 6D 1.026 62.754 F Rd) 832 - Gulfview Blvd (Clearwater Pass to CL - 2D - 1.132 18,020 F - Roundabout 848 Highland Ave (Belleair Rd to Druid Rd) CR 2U 1.255 16.500 F 850 Ave (Gulf to Bay Blvd to Drew CL 2D 0.506 18.174 F Highland 851 Highland Ave (Drew St to Sunset Point CL 2D 1.512 18.668 F Rd 852 Highland Ave (Sunset Point Rd to Union CL 2U 0.504 18,000 F 5-11 892 Keene Rd (Belleair Rd to Druid Rd) CR 4D 1.255 34,801 F 895 Keene Rd (Drew St to Sunset Point Rd) CR 14D 1.518 34,500 F 968 - McMullen Booth Rd (Gulf to Bay Blvd to CR - 6D - 2.267 72,011 F - Sunset Point Rd 969 - McMullen Booth Rd (Sunset Point Rd to CR 6D 2.233 74,000 F SR 580 970 Booth Rd (SR 580 to Curlew CR 6D 1.768 66.000 F RMdcMullen 979 - Memorial Cswv (Clwtr Beach Roundabout to Island Way) SR 4D 0.447 41.500 F 1008 NE Coachman Rd (Drew St to US 19) 1 SR 2U 11.741 25.068 F 22 Ordinance No. 8805-16 10191 Nursery Rd (US 19 to Belcher Rd) CR 2E 0.961 11,500 E 1154 SR 580 (US 19 to Belcher Rd) SR 6D 0.556 55,000 F 1192 Sunset Point Rd (Keene Rd to Belcher CR 4D 1.098 34,003 F BdI 1193 Sunset Point Rd (Belcher Rd to US 19) 1 CR 4D 0.959 36.562 F 1230 I US 19 (SR 580 to Curlew Rd) SR 6P 2.035 100,000 I E Notes: 1. CR — County road; CL — City of Clearwater; SR — State road. 2. AADT — Annual Average Daily Traffic. 3. Policy constrained roadway per the 2035 2040 Pinellas County Long Range Transportation Plan or Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. Source: Year 2026 2015 AADT Traffic Forecast and PM Peak Level Sof Service, Pinellas County MP0—'2898. 23 Ordinance No. 8805-16 Section 28. That the Capital Improvement Program Revenue Summary of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element, page 1-15 through 1-17, be repealed and replaced to read as follows: SELF SUPPORTING F1 INDS ...45,000 ... ...45,090 45,900 ..... PaFking ReVeRue 31 Q'QQQ 235,000 240,000 235,000 235,900 235,000 4,469,009 VV.ateF Revepue 6,020,07-0 875,000 4,967,580 2,576,000 375,()Qg 375,000 42,498,650 S9W9F R8V8Rwe 2,666,6500 4,719,170 4,490,000 41,696,879 5,468,080 4,997,639 26,648,350 .... 87,570 22,640 29,219 20,040 27,780 437,440 SeweF 'FnpaGt Fees 500,000 4,07-2,350 28,900 40,820 45,07-0 44,429 4,644,560 .. .. Stermwater Utility ReveRUe 4,334,450 .. 3,837,709 Gas R8VeRUO ..... 2,740,000 ... 2,759,000 .... .... 46,445,000 Solid VVa6te ReYeRUe 445,000 445,000 460,GOO 545,000 546,000 530,090 2,944,000 Subtotal Self-SuppoFting Funds 19,97-6,720 ,.. 0. INTERNAL SERVICS FUNDS GaFage FURGI Revenue 40,000 440,7-60 444,080 .. 424,030 424,660--.. .. ReVeRUe .... 450,000 ... 4 75,OOG 476,000 ... 4,200,000 ReVeRwe. . . . ... . ... 24 Ordinance No. 8805-144 - - - • I - SMT I _ filwAKGw!T!• - f btli 25 Ordinance No. 8805-16 CAPITAL EMPROVEMENT PROGRAM REVENUE SUMMARY FY 2015-16 THROUGH FY 2020/21 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND CITY OF CLEARWATER 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 .2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 Total GENERAL SOURCES General Revenue 2,836,150 3,003,140 3,256,980 3,129,530 6.981,480 3,043,560 22,250,840 Road Millage 2,060,100 2,060,100 2,060,100 2,060,100 2,060,100 2,060,100 12,360,600 Penny for Pinellas 6,021,820 14,980,060 5.439,840 10.263,460 9.555,250 0 46,260.430 Transportation Impact Fees 190,000 190,000 140.000 140,000 140,000 140,000 940,000 Local Option Gas Tax 1.438.330 1.450,000 0 0 0 0 2.888.330 Special Program Fund 935.000 530.000 30.000 30.000 30.000 30,000 1,585,000 Grants - Other Agencies 1,485,000 560,000 80,000 960,000 3,040,000 0 6.125,000 Donations 100.000 50,000 0 0 0 0 150,000 To Be Determined 0 22,397,000 1,483,740 1,929,880 2,227,150 2,223,390 30,261,160 Subtotal General Sources 1.5,066,400 45,220,300 12,490,660 18,512,970 24,033,980 7,497,050 122,821,360 SELF-SUPPORTING FUNDS Marine Revenue 95,000 70.000 70.000 70,000 70,000 70.000 445,000 Clearwater Harbor Marina Fund 25,000 25.000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25.000 150,000 Aviation Revenue 25,000 155.000 35,000 15,000 15.000 15.000 260,000 Parking Revenue 2,409.000 410.500 406.000 407,500 409.000 409.000 4,451,000 Water Revenue 2,586.000 2.240,470 3,071.000 4,651,000 4,271,000 4,251,000 21,070,470 Sewer Revenue 8.412,830 7,879,280 5.200.960 4,853,500 6.161.480 7,040,510 39,548.560 Water Impact Fees 24.000 24,000 24,000 24,000 24,000 24,000 144,000 Sewer Impact Fees 82,130 12,460 12,460 12,460 12,460 12,460 144,430 Utility R&R 8.667,170 9,205,680 3.939,040 4,030,390 4,030,390 4,367,030 34,239,700 Stormwater Utility Revenue 5,498.550 5,825,100 5,831,860 6,348,450 6,729,430 6,294,000 36,527,390 Gas Revenue 6.050.000 4,050,000 13,850,000 4,050,000 4.050,000 4,050,000 36,100,000 Solid Waste Revenue 535,000 535,000 535,000 535,000 535,000 535,000 3,210,000 Recycling Revenue 90,000 100,000 100.000 100.000 100.000 100.000 590,000 Subtotal Self -Supporting Funds 34,499,680 30,532,490 33,100,320 25,122,300 26,432,760. 27,193,000 176,880,550 INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS Garage Fund Revenue 77,400 79,720 82,110 84.580 87,110 89.730 500.650 Administrative Service Revenue 1,710,000 1.350,000 1,150,000 1,150.000 1,706,860 1.475,000 8,541,860 Subtotal Internal Services Fund 1,787,400 1,429,720 1,232,110 1,234,580 1,793,970 1,564,730 9,042,510 BORROWING GENERAL BC 26 Ordinance No. 8805-16 Lease Purchase - General Fund 246,000 608,000 2,550,820 643,220 976,950 1,832,800 6,857,790 Subtotal Borrowing/General Sources 246,000 608,000 2,550,820 643,220 976,950 1,832,800 6,857,790 SELF-SUPPORTING FUNDS Lease Purchase - Stormwater 320,000 0 0 0 0 0 320,000 Lease Purchase - Gas 161,000 0 0 0 0 0 161,000 Lease Purchase - Water 60,000 0 0 0 0 0 60,000 Lease Purchase - Sewer 109,000 0 700,000 0 0 0 809,000 Future Bond Issue - Water & Sewer 11,867,870 11,378,110 20,987,540 4,433,650 5,365,670 0 54,032,840 Subtotal Borrowing/Self Supporting Funds 12,517,870 11,378,110 21,687,540 4,433,650 5,365,670 0 55,382,840 INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS Lease Purchase - Garage 5,441,000 5,520,440 5,620,850 5,223,270 5,327,730 5,434,290 32,567,580 Lease Purchase - Administrative Services 405,000 405,000 405,000 410,000 410,000 500,000 2,535,000 Subtotal Borrowing/Internal Service Funds 5,846,000 5,925,440 6,025,850 5,633,270 5,737,730 5,934,290 35,102,580 TOTAL: ALL FUNDING SOURCES 69,963,350 95,094,060 77,087,300 55,579,990 64,341,060 44,021,870 406,087,630 Source: 2015 — 2016 Annual Operating Budget and Capital Improvement Budget 27 Ordinance No. 8805-16 Section 29. That the Capital Improvement Program Expenditure Summary by Function of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element, page 1-17, be repealed as replaced to read as follows: . .. - . f .. a a I .. ... ..f ... .. .. r�.T. ... ... ..... - --- --- . ... -- ... --- !To ..... -- --- I M ... -- --- -- ... ... --- ... I -- --- ... ...... _ - --- .. . _.. . .. .. .�� . . . . .r a a . .. ... . . . ... .... . ... ..... a 2 a .... ...... a 2 a . ... ..... . . ... .. . -- --- -- --- -- --- -- --- -- --- -- --- - -- --- --- - --- - --- --- Sam - --- - --- - --- . ... . ... . ..... . . . IN 28 Ordinance No. 8805-16 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BY FUNCTION FY 2015/16 THROUGH FY 2020/21 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND CITY OF CLEARWATER Schedule of Planned Expenditures Function 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 Total Police Protection 200,000 3,305,000 0 0 0 0 3,505,000 Fire Protection 1,476,390 4,857,920 3,275,470 4,778,060 1,391,340 2,195,710 17,974,890 Major Street Maintenance 3,656,430 5,668,100 5,654,850 5,654,850 3,658,850 3,484,850 27,777,930 Sidewalk and Bike Trails 472,000 472,000 472,000 472,000 473,250 473,250 2,834,500 Intersections 335,000 335,000 331,990 315,410 315,400 315,390 1,948,190 Parkinq 2,389,000 19,482,500 381,000 382,500 384,000 384,000 23,403,000 Miscellaneous Engineering 935,000 535,000 35,000 35,000 2,460,000 35,000 4,035,000 Parks Development 6,735,000 5,037,000 3,564,840 3,325,000 7,125,000 1,440,000 27,226,840 Marine Facilities 410,000 385,000 390,000 390,000 390,000 390,000 2,355,000 Airpark Facilities 65,000 715,000 115,000 1,215,000 3,815,000 15,000 5,940,000 Libraries 115,580 387,350 27,340 462,720 35,000 0 1,027,990 Garage 5,639,400 5,700,160 5,702,960 5,307,850 5,414,840 5,524,020 33,289,230 Maintenance of Buildings 902,000 881,850 794,070 2,161,630 1,084,590 1,045,650 6,869,790 General Public City Building 110,000 522,800 4,646,630 985,650 10,289,100 0 16,554,180 Miscellaneous 2,125,000 5,995,000 1,625,000 1,630,000 1,955,000 2,045,000 15,375,000 Stormwater Utility 5,802,550 5,714,380 4,751,150 6,174,320 4,999,690 6,294,000 33,736,090 Gas System 6,211,000 4,050,000 13,850,000 4,050,000 4,050,000 4,050,000 36,261,000 Solid Waste & Recycling 625,000 635,000 635,000 635,000 635,000 635,000 3,800,000 Utilities Miscellaneous 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 120,000 Sewer System 24,469,000 23,260,000 16,260,000 11,400,000 10,200,000 10,150,000 95,739,000 Water System 7,270,000 7,135,000 14,555,000 6.185,000 5,645,000 5,525,000 46,315.000 69,963,350 95,094,060 77,087,300 55,579,990 64,341,060 44,021,870 406,087,630 Source: City of Clearwater Ordinance 8768-15, Exhibit B 29 Ordinance No. 8805-16 Section 30. Should any part or provision of this Ordinance be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the Ordinance as a whole, or any part thereof other than the part declared to be invalid. Section 31. This ordinance shall become effective when the Department of Economic Opportunity issues a final order determining the adopted amendment to be in compliance, or the Administration Commission issues a final order determining the adopted amendments to be in compliance, in accordance with Section 163.3184, F.S., as amended. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Approved as to form: Camilo Soto . Assistant City Attorney George N. Cretekos Mayor Attest: Rosemarie Call City Clerk 30 Ordinance No. 8805-16 ORDINANCE NO. 8805-16 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER (THE CITY), FLORIDA, AMENDING THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN BY AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT UPDATING THE CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND ALLOWING FOR NON-CONTIGUOUS ANNEXATIONS; BY AMENDING THE TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT IMPLEMENTING A MOBILITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND REPEALING TRANSPORTATION CONCURRENCY, ESTABLISHING MULTI -MODAL DESIGN FEATURES, AND ENSURING THE CITY'S COORDINATION WITH THE METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION AND THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION; BY AMENDING THE COASTAL MANGEMENT ELEMENT BY REMOVING TRAFFIC FROM LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS AND ADDING POLICIES ENCOURAGING STRATEGIES AND ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS THAT REDUCE FLOOD RISK IN COASTAL AREAS; BY AMENDING THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT REMOVING REFERENCE TO ROAD LEVEL OF SERVICE; BY AMENDING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT REMOVING TRANSPORTATION LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS AND UPDATING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND EXPENDITURE AND REVENUE SUMMARIES; UPDATING VARIOUS TERMS AND REFERENCES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act of Florida empowers and requires the City Council of the City of Clearwater to plan for the future development and growth of the City, and to adopt and periodically amend the Comprehensive Plan, including elements and portions thereof; and WHEREAS, Florida House Bill 7207, also known as the Community Planning Act, was signed into law in 2011; and WHEREAS, the Community Planning Act removed State requirements for local government implementation of transportation concurrency management systems; and WHEREAS, the City of Clearwater participated in a multi -jurisdictional Mobility Plan Task Force, facilitated by the Pinellas County Metropolitan Planning Organization, to develop a framework for a countywide approach to implementation of a mobility management system in place of transportation concurrency; and WHEREAS, the City of Clearwater desires to replace transportation concurrency with a mobility management system approach that is multi -modal, and designed to better support redevelopment and associated transportation, land use, intergovernmental, and capital improvement goals; and WHEREAS, additional amendments are proposed to address an Interlocal Service Boundary Agreement (ISBA) the city and Pinellas County entered into which allows voluntary annexations of noncontiguous properties within "Type A" enclaves, as defined in the ISBA; and WHEREAS, such ISBA should be recognized in the Comprehensive Plan; and [A04-01420 /179548/11 Ordinance No. 8805-16 III WHEREAS, the City Council finds it necessary, desirable and proper to adopt the amendments to the objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan in order to reflect changing conditions; now, therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. That Policy A.2.2.6 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Element, page A-10, be amended to read as follows: A.2.2.6 The Community Development Code shall provide for safe on-site traffic circulation and connections to adjacent arterial and collector streets consistent with Florida Department of Transportation-nd_lnstitute of Traffic Engineers design guidelines, and other applicable roadway design standards policies, and guidelines. Section 2. That Goal A.4 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Element, and its Objective and Policies, pages A-11 through A-12, be amended to read as follows: A.4 GOAL – THE CITY SHALL NOT PERMIT DEVELOPMENT TO OCCUR UNLESS AN ADEQUATE LEVEL OF SERVICE IS AVAILABLE C TO ACCOMMODATE THE IMPACTS OF DEVELOPMENT. AREAS IN WHIGH THE IMCAGT OF EXISTING DEVELOPMENT -vcrccvr�nz-rte-r.—rtrcc-r�v-rtrT�-rrvrr� ..... .. _ . _ . —. _. _ ... _ _'.. .. :. EXCEEDS TLC DESIRED LEVELS S OF SERVICE WILL BE UPGRADED CONSISTENT WITH THE TARGET DATES CAC INIFI ASTRUCT IURE IMPROVEMENTS INC I DED IN TUE APPLICABLE E FUNCTIONAL PLAN EI EMENTWORK TOWARD A LAND USE - PATTERN THAT CAN BE SUPPORTED BY THE AVAILABLE COMMUNITY AND PUBLIC FACILITIES THAT WOULD BE REQUIRED TO SERVE THE DEVELOPMENT. A.4.1 Objective - The City shall examine and upgrade the CenGUFrenGy Management and nfermation system as appropriate for Fenting development permitS. This systeFR shall Genfinue to Gensoder the eurrent, interim, and ultimately desired Levels of ServiGe for Feads, transit, wateF, sewer, garbage relleGtien, and dFainage systems and shall PF9VIde data on sub seGtoFs of the Gity in whiGh sewirae defirienGies exist OF in wh"r.h seFv*ees aFe adequate to serve existing and planned new development. This level of servaGe status will be considered and made part of the staff Feeemmendation at the fime of zening, sate plan, OF plat appFoyal. The level of seFyirae meniteFiRg saPaeity. The City's Concurrency Management System will ensure the compatibility of all proposed development with the capacities of the existing and planned support facilities for which a level of service has been adopted. Should a Fequested development peFMit result approyals whiGh would burden stems above adopted levels, peMissien tG PFOGeed with the development IMF Fed that adequate serviGes w heavai-ah-e conGUFrent with the DPA-. Policies A.4.1.1 [A04-01420 /179548/1] 2 Ordinance No. 8805-16 development.HeweveF, development eFdeFs may be phased OF ethepNise modified Gensistent The Concurrency ? �, Management System shall ensure proposed development is in conformance with existing and planned support facilities for which a level of service standard has been adopted and that such facilities and services are available, at the adopted level of service standards concurrent with the impacts of development. . r l A.4.1.2 The Cites Concurrency Management System shall include, at minimum, level service standards for parkland, potable water, sanitary sewer, solid waste, and stormwater. A.4.1.3 The City, when making decisions on requests to amend the Future Land Use May or the Zoning Atlas (other than decisions on appropriate locations for mixed-use or transit oriented development) shall review the potential impact on the transportation system by considering the following: a. Ability of the surrounding existing and planned transportation network to meet the mobility obiectives of the Comprehensive Plan; �� { b. Capacity of the surrounding existing and planned transportation network to accommodate any projected additional demand; and`k' c. Extent to which the proposed Future Land Use Map amendment or rezoning furthers the intent of the Comprehensive Plan to improve mobility. A.4.1.24 The City shall recognize the overriding Constitutional principle that private property P' shall not be taken without due process of law and the payment of just. compensation, which principle is restated in Section 163.3194 (4) (a)/Land FI rida Statutes. }, Section 3. That Policy A.5.4.8 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Futu Use v Element, page A-14, be amended to read as follows: A.5.4.8 _ Imr�lement a MobilityMana ement S stem hereinafter the Mobili M na a ement S stem2ass V detailed in the City's Community Development Code, to support Higher densities along redevelopment corridors and in activity centers. Section 4. That Policy A.7.1.2 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use�� Element, page A-24, be amended to read as follows: IDA A.7.1.2 When evaluating and prioritizing areas to annex, consideration should be given to thet following: " Q • Whether property was given high priority in the City's Sewer System Expansion A y [A04-01420 /179548/1] ( , 3 Ordinance No. 8805-16 ,��.��r��f' •" Feasibility Study Update completed in 2002 2011; Section 5. That a new Policy A.7.2.4 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Element, page A-25, be added, with subsequent Policies renumbered, and that Policy A.7.2.6, as renumbered, be amended to fix a typographical error: A.7.2.4 Allow voluntary annexations for noncontiguous properties that are within an enclave as defined by Section 171.032(13)(a) Florida Statutes ("Type A" enclaves). A.7.2.45 Promote economic development programs and activities to businesses within the unincorporated areas of the Clearwater Planning Area. A.7.2.56 Continue to work with property owners and Pinellas County to permit development activities in the. County prior to the effective date of annexation provided the proposed development complies with the provisions of the City of Clearwater Development Code. Section 6. That the Transportation Needs Summary section of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element, page B-1, be amended to read as follows: Traffic Circulation & Mobility • Multi-modal transportation improvements to Clearwater Beach should continue to be planned and/or utilized to alleviate traffic congestion and parking demands on the Memorial Causeway and the beach. • Access management to improve traffic flow will continue to be an important issue in development reviews, with particular emphasis on congested links. &ystern. • Belleair Road (CR462) and Clearwater Memorial Causeway (SR60) are physically and/or environmentally constrained and will Gentinue to epeFate below the eptable levels of seFViGe. The City will continue to work with Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), Tampa Bay Area Regional Transportation Authority (TBARTA), Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority (PSTA) and other agencies to pFemete tFaRSPOFtation alteMatives and demand FnanageMeRt. create and maintain a multi-modal transportation system that is safe and efficient for all users including bicyclists pedestrians and transit users as well as motorists. [A04-01420 /179548/1] Section 7. That the Traffic Circulation section of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element, page B-3, be renamed as follows: TRAFFIC CIRCULATION & MOBILITY Section 8. That Goal B.1 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element, page B-3, be amended and a new Objective B.1.1 and its Policies be added to read as follows, with subsequent Objectives and Policies renumbered: B.1„ GOAL - THE TRAFFIC GIRGULATION SYSTEM THE CITY SHALL PROVIDE FOR THE A_SAFE,_CONVENIENT AND ENERGY EFFICIENT ni DE Eov OF PEOPLE AN -D MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM THAT SERVES TO INCREASE MOBILITY, EFFICIENTLY UTILIZE ROADWAY CAPACITY, REDUCE THE INCIDENCE OF SINGLE -OCCUPANT VEHICLE TRAVEL, REDUCE THE CONTRIBUTION TO AIR POLLUTION FROM MOTOR VEHICLES, AND IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF LIFE TO THE CITIZENS OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER. B.1.1 Objective — Maintain the major road network performance within the City while furthering development of a multi -modal transportation system that increases mobility for pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit users as well as for motorists. Policies 8.1.1.1 The Citv shall implement the Mobilitv Manaqement Svstem within the _City's Community Development Code. The impacts of land development projects shall be managed through the application of Transportation Element policies, through requirements of the Community Development Code, and through the site plan review process. The Mobility Management System shall address the following: a. All development proiects generating new peak hour trips shall be subject to payment of a multi -modal impact fee. b. Development projects that generate between 51 and 300 new peak hour trips of deficient roads shall be classified as tier 1 and required to submit a transportation management plan (TMP) designed to address their impacts while increasing mobility and reducing demand for single occupant vehicle travel. c. Development projects that generate more than 300 new peak hour trips on deficient roads shall be classed as tier 2, required to conduct a traffic impact study, and submit an accompanying report and TMP based on the report findings. d. Multi -modal impact fee assessments may be applied as credit toward the cost of a TMP. e. A traffic study and/or TMP for a development project not impacting a deficient road corridor shall be required if necessary to address the impact of additional trips generated by the project on the surrounding traffic circulation system. B.1.1.2 The City shall continue to use roadway levels of service for planning purposes. B.1.1.3 The Capital Improvements Element shall include reference to "deficient' roadways, as identified through the most recent version of the annual Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Level of Service Reportincluding facilities operating at peak [A04-01420 /179548/11 5 Ordinance No. 8805-16 hour level of service (LOS) E and F and/or volume -to -capacity (v/c) ratio 0.9 or greater without a mitigating improvement scheduled for construction within three years. 13.1.1.4 The City shall utilize multi -modal impact fee revenue to fund multi -modal improvements to local, county, or state facilities that are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan as well as the MPO Long Range Transportation Plan 2040. 8.1.1.5 The City shall work cooperatively with the MPO and other local governments to complete the biennial update of the Multi -modal Impact Fee Ordinance through the MPO planning process. 6.1.1.6 The City shall continue to work with the Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority (PSTA) to increase the efficiency of the fixed -route system by encouraging mass transit use through the application of the Mobility Management System and the City's site plan review process. Section 9. That Objective 6.1.2 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element, as renumbered by this ordinance, page B-3, and its Policies be amended, and Policies 13.1.2.3 through 13.1.2.8 be added to read as follows, with subsequent Objectives and Policies renu bered: 13.1] Objective— Every expansion OF extension of aFteFial and GolleCtOF streets shall be possible, enhanced design to acGemmedate bieyeleipedestrian traffir.; e Futur improvements to arterial and collector streets shall be context -sensitive by planning and designing the roadway based on the existing context of the surrounding built environment and the planned land use vision. 6.1. 1 The City shall continue to administer access management and right-of-way requirements through the Community Development Code. B.i.�Zlj2 The City will promote programs that ensure physical safety of non -motorized transportation users in accordance with the City's Shifting Gears: Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan. 6.1.2.3 The City will operate, maintain, and improve the City transportation system consistent with the Florida Department of Transportation's (FDOT) Complete Streets Policy. 13.1.2.4 The City shall coordinate efforts with FDOT to incorporate bicycle and pedestrian - friendly provisions in the design. and construction of expansion and resurfacing projects on State roads, where feasible. 8.1.2.5 The City shall require land development projects to make adequate provisions for bicycle parking and storage as appropriate. B.1.2.6 The City shall include sidewalks where feasible alongside roadways scheduled for resurfacing. [A04-01420 /179548/11 6 Ordinance No. 8805-16 Section 10. That Objective B.1.3 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element, pages B-3 and B-4, and its Policies be amended as follows: 8.1.34 Objective -The_ City will continue to monitor traffic counts, accidents, and road �........ _ 44.4........4.._ ............... improvements, to provide timely status evaluation of level of service conditions4or of development appFeyals. Policies 6.1.344.1 Requests for amendment to the Futwe Land Use Map will have an analysis of tFa {repasts. The City shall continue to review potential trips generated by Future Land Use Map amendments and Zoning Atlas Amendments 1.1-111 k 1110 0111 B.1.34.32 The seasurrensy Mobili aiManagement sSystem will be eRhansed applied through improved departmental coordination, and the PFeaGtiVe ideRtifiGatiw; and Feselution of level of 6epv*Ge �..__ 'jy�e G.��re.q 1Iti� 3�ovll•...atf Section 11. ThatPolicies 8.1.4.1 through 8.1.4.7 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Transportation Ele� nt, pages B B-5, be4mended to read as follows: Policies 8.1.45.1 The City shall continue to review trips generated by land development projects through the TFaffiG GenGUFFenGy MaRagement PFOgFaFn Mobility Management System. 8.1.45.2 For those roads which are not currently operating at an acceptable LOS, or which do not have PF99Farnmed impmyements to upgFade seFvbee te an aGeeptable level a mitigating improvement scheduled for construction within three years, the sensurrepsy Mobili foManagement sSystem shall be used to monitor traffic growth, with the dual intent of maintaining average operating speeds and restricting the aggregate and individual trips generated by development in the City limits. B.4.4.3 The raenGwFenrsy management system shall addFess thFesholds an applying the [A04-01420 /179548/1] 7 Ordinance No. 8805-16 Section 13. That Objective B.2.1 of the Clea rwT r Com• rehens.Ke Plan Transportation Element, page B-6, be amended, and Policies 8.2.1.2 aN� added to read as follows: B.2.1 Objective - Roadway improvements must be included in State, County, and City capital budgets. The City shall actively participate, on a continuing basis, with both the staff and elected official support, in the preparation, adoption and implementation of transportation . plans and expenditure programs of the M.P.O. MPO, ;P SQA. PSTA, Board of County Commissioners, and the F.D.O.T FDOT. 8.2.1.1 The City shall review and comment on the proposed capital improvement programs and provide input to the adopting agencies relative to consistency with Clearwater's Comprehensive Plan. B.2.1.2 The City shall provide the MPO with available up-to-date traffic data, such as signal timings and traffic counts to assist with level -of -service monitoring and development of the MPO's Long Range Transportation Plan. Section 14. That Objective B.2.3 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element, page B-8, be amended, and that Policy B.2.3.2 be deleted as follows: 6.2.3 Objective...-_The_City_of Clearwater shall._ annually ..........................._...._._i....'.....__.__._..... __....... _.._..............._...Frerdcodecha I and coordinate with and provide input in the update of the Metropolitan Planning Organization's (MPO) Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) involving County and State roads. The following transpeFtati it pFejerts that will work programs fOF FY2008109 2012/13: USHwghwayl9FFOM�SefSey"!!eB!vd.toNefSR60 State [A04-01420 /179548/1] 9 Ordinance No. 8805-16 *-.7 10 \'y "Y Policies 13.2.3.1p gad im rovements which are currently programmed for construction should be commentlre6lj.I'dorrotrememberJoncon continued in the Capital Improvement Element of the jurisdiction having operational askin eommentttgo.this nhaito�essvt`d im met was along the lines whydo we have other reSpOnSIbllltyforthOSerpadS. juttsdicton'r6adswithinourconpplan "" ' Comment [WU2je i;Auren, your thoughts on 13.2.3.2 When designing Feadway *MPFGvements, the &ty will rensWeF whit was meant, by "Jonson's commentTl want to 'ensure that it's beinjaddressedby what's currently -= drafted here. Section 15. That Objective 6.4.4 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element, page B-14, and Policies 13.4.4.1 and 13.4.4.2 be amended to read as follows: 6.4.4 Objective —The City shall participate and cooperate with agencies and committees to enhance and promote the of mass tFansmt public transportation system. 13.4.4.1 Clearwater shall coordinate with PSTA and the MPO in the Gentinued adopt development of the Five-Year Transit Development Pfegram-Plan to addFess tFaRsi guideliaes. identify and include transit improvements that benefit the City. 6.4.4.2 Clearwater will cooperate with PSTA and the MPO to'the tFansit system to G06RE;We with the impFavement detailed in the yeaF 2010 and 2046 FAGSt GLIFFePA veFsen f the Long o..nge Mass T.Fans°t Plans. identify transit improvements that - could be incorporated as part of corridor plans or development projects. Section 16. That Objective E.1.5 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Coastal Management Element, page E-5, be amended to read as follows: E.1.5, _Objective - Llevel of service standards as defined in the functional elements_ of the IF erdcode a ed I _ -. _ _.. Comprehensive Plan (tra#iG, public utilities, recreation and open space), are established and are recognized as applicable to the coastal storm area. Section 17. That Objective E.1.6 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Coastal Management Element, page E-5, be amended to read as follows, and that new Policies E.1.6.2 and E.1.6.3 be added to read as follows, with subsequent Policies renumbered: E.1.6 Objective - Development and Rredevelopment areas established in the coastal storm area should address the needs and opportunities unique to those locations. E.1.6.1 Redevelopment proposals and plans shall be reviewed for compliance with the goals, objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan and other appropriate plans including Beach by Design: A Preliminary Design for Clearwater Beach and Design Guidelines and the City's NFIP Community Rating System Floodplain Management Plan. E.1.6.2 New development or redevelopment is encouraged to include principles, strategies, or engineering solutions that: [A04-01420 /179548/11 10 Ordinance No. 8805-16 a. reduce the flood risk in the coastal areas which results from high -tide events, storm surge flash floods, stormwater runoff, and the related impacts of sea -level riaL b. may reduce losses due to flooding and claims made under flood insurance policies issued in this state. E.1.6.3 New development or redevelopment shall be consistent with, or more stringent than, the flood -resistant construction requirements in the Florida Building Code and applicable flood plain management regulations set forth in 44 C.F.R. part 60. Section 18. That the Intergovernmental Coordination Needs Summary of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Intergovernmental Coordination Element, page H-1, be amended to read as follows: Intergovernmental Coordination Needs Summary The following summarizes the Intergovernmental Coordination Element: • Road improvements, and backlogged facilities, and levels of ^^^^^^ need the coordination of all jurisdictions along the corridor in establishing and maintaining appropriate land use and traffic policies. Coordination with the Florida Department of Transportation(FDOT) is also a major issue to be addressed by continued participation in the M.P-0. process. In addition, Clearwater should continue to be involved with the Tampa Bay Area Regional Transportation Authority (TBARTA)laP nning process. Section 19. That Objective H.2.2 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Intergovernmental Coordination Element, page H-4, and its Policies be amended, and Policy H.2.2.3 be added to read as follows: H.2.Z_ Objective - The City shall adopt the F:9:�T. FDOT level of serviGe standards for State { Freed c«i changes primary and secondary arterials as they may be modified by additional service designations (special transportation areas, etc.) approved by F.D.O.T. FDOT and shall use intergovernmental coordination agreements to secure maximum City control over access and management of roads in Clearwater. Policies H.2.2.1 The City shall continue to cooperate with F, -o-� . FDOT in all matters of traffic signal access requests that affect the State highway system. H.2.2.2 Clearwater shall provide F.D.O..T. FDOT with annual reports that document efforts at concurrency management on State roads. H.2.2.3 The City will consult with FDOT with regard to the access onto State facilities for new land development projects. Section 20. That the Capital Improvements Element Needs Summary of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element, page 1-1, be deleted as follows: [A04-01420 /179548/11 11 Ordinance No. 8805-16 Capital iMPFOvements Element-Needs SummaFy annually by the &ty Goundl: BeuleyaFd. Funding is Penny for PiRellas M. Waste funds. • The $1.2 million ReGlaimed WateF DiStFibutien System GIP projeGt being funded thFOUgh wateF funds. • The $9.885 million SanitaFy Sewer ExtensienS GIP pFojeGt is being funded through: $1.64-2 m6ilign from SeweF !FnpaGt, $4A01 million thFOUgh Utility Renewal and ReplaGeMeAt, aAd $4.442 • The $23.883 million Pa*s Deyelopment proje6ts eyeF the six yeaF CIP peFied aFe being funded I— EyeRts Revenue. Section 21. That Objective 1.1.1 of the cul er Compreh nsive Plan Capital t y Improvements Element, page 1-2, and Policies 1.1.1;; 1. 9, 1.1.1.11, and 1.1.1.12 beamended to read as follows:` 1.1.1 Objective — The Capital Improvements Element (CIE) of the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Clearwater shall be reviewed and adopted annually in light of the needs t - addressed in various elements of the Comprehensive Plan including the fifth year need . xxxxx 1.1.1.2 The Aannual Uppdate to the Five-Year Schedule of Capital Improvements Capital is hereby incorporated by reference and is located following pPolicy 1.1.6.3. `%AZ xxxxx � 1.1.1.5 Capital-improvemes' fojects proposed for inclusion in the schedule of capital improvements shout be evaluated on the following criteria and considered in the priority listed below: ,! [A04-01420 /179548/1] 12 Ordinance No. 8805-16 1.1.1.9 As stated in the City Charter, the total indebtedness of the City of Clearwater, which for the purpose of this limitation shall include revenue, refunding and improvement bonds, of the City ef Gleapwate shall not exceed twenty percent (20%) of the current assessed valuation of all real property located in the City; nd4he. Ttotal budgeted expenditures in any fiscal year shall not exceed the total estimated revenue plus any unencumbered funds carried forward from a prior fiscal year. 1.1.1.11 . The City will coordinate with the FDOT and the Pinellas County MPO to promote the inclusion of projects in the plans and programs of these agencies into the Five-Year Schedule of Capital Improvements. 1.1.1.12 era dune 9,2918: Section 22. That Policy 1.1.3.1 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element, page 1-5, be amended to read as follows: 1.1.3.1 Essential public facilities as defined in this plan include and are limited to those facilities relating to sanitary sewer, solid waste, stormwater, potable water, transpeFtafien, and parks and recreation systems. Section 23. That Policy 1.1.3.3 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element, page 1-5, be amended to read as follows: 1.1.3.3 If it is determined that sufficient capacity of essential public facilities will be available concurrent with the impacts of a proposed development, a final development order may be issued in accordance with the following schedule: that Fe , lts in ♦rater generatieR_ Section 24. That Policy 1.1.3.5 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element, page 1-6, be amended to read as follows: 1.1.3.5 An applicant for a development order may.request a determination of the capacity of the essential public facilities as part of the review and approval of the development order provided that: (c) Whenever an applicant's pro rata share of a public facility is less than the full cost of the facility; the City shall do one of the following: i. contract with the applicant for the full cost of the facility including terms regarding reimbursement of the applicant for costs in excess of the applicant's pro rata share; or [A04-01420 /179548/11 13 Ordinance No. 8805-16 ii. obtain assurances similar to those in subsection (b) above from other sources; or i". amend this GeFnpFehensive plan to Fnedify the adopted standard fGF the level of (FIHS), and TFanspaFtatien Regional Impast PFejeet (TRIP) funded state Feads. Section 25. That Table: Summary of Level of Service Standards in Policy 1.1.3.7 Capital Improvements Element, of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan, page 1-7, be amended to read as follows: Table: Summary of Level of Service Standards Facilities Element LOS Standard TFanspeFtatfer} T-ranspeFtatien LOS G daily and LOS D pm peak fGF all Feads Sanitary Sewer Utilities Average of 127gallons per person per day GPCD Solid Waste Utilities Average Solid Waste Generator Rate of 7.12 pounds per capita per da Stormwater Utilities Design storm: 10 — year storm frequency for all new street development using the rational design method 25 — year frequency with positive outfall for major storm systems with basin time of intensities controlling the duration.' 50 — year storm frequency when no outfall and discharge is to street right-of-way.' 100 — year storm frequency when no outfall and discharge is across private property.' Design standards for stormwater quality treatment/storage quantity shall conform to the current SWFWMD requirement [Presently being the SCS Unit Hydrograph design method, using the design storm frequency and a twenty-four (24) hour duration for sites ten (10) acres or more, and the rational design method for sites under ten 10 acres]. Potable Water Utilities Average Water Consumption Rate and Natural 120 gallons per capita per day at a pressure of Ground Water 40-45 psi.' Aquifer 'Continue to maintain water consumption of Recharge one hundred twenty (120) GPCPD or less as per the conditions set forth by Clearwater's Water Use Permit. Hurricane Coastal 16 hours (out of county for a category 5 -storm Evacuation Management event as measured on the Saffir-Simpson scale Parks Recreation 4 acres of parkland per one thousand (1,000) and Open persons for Citywide application Space [A04-01420 /179548/11 14 e Ordinance No. 8805-16 . Section 26. That a new Policy 1.1.4.8 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element, page 1-8, be added to read as follows: Policies 1.1.4.8 The City will continue to use roadway level of service for planning purposes. Section 27. That Policy 1.1.5.1 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element, page 1-8, be deleted as follows, and that Policy 1.1.5.4, page 1-9, be amended to read as follows, with Policies renumbered: Policies I.I.&I in 1990, the City instituted a GORGUFFeRGy management WdinanGe feF the theFoughfaFe system, which states that SUffiGient eapae'ty exists PFi0F to GeFtifiGate of the 1=08 FepE)Ft te ensure the Gentipmed meniteFing of the LOS usiRg data available fFeFn the Gemputeizized tFaffiG signal system. This system shall sentinue to inGlu 1.1.5.31 The City shall recognize the overriding Constitutional principle that private property shall not be taken without due process of law and the payment of just compensation, which principle is restated in Section 163.3194 (4) (a) Florida Statutes. 1.1.5.32 In the planning of capital improvements, the City shall consider the effect of such improvement on local resources listed on the National Register of Historic Places with the intent to preserve the integrity of such places. 1.1.5.43 In the planning of capital improvements, the City shall consider the effects of controversial public facilities, such as landfills, prisons, and power lines, with the intent of locating them in areas where they may best serve their purpose and have the fewest negative impacts. 1.1.5.64 The City will require develepeFs development t impaGt thFeshold has been met be consistent with the provisions of the Mobility Management System established in Goal B.1 of the Transportation Element. Section 28. That the Annual Update to the Capital Improvements Element of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element, page 1-10 through 1-14, be amended to read as follows: FY20105/146 ANNUAL UPDATE TO THE SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS CI CSAENT - - In the following, the concurrency -related public facilities (i.e., solid waste, potable water, stormwater, sanitary sewer, and parkland and Feads) are evaluated to determine that the City's adopted level of [A04-01420 /179548/1] 15 Ordinance No. 8805-16 service (LOS) standards are currently being met and will be adequate to serve approved and planned development over the next five years. The adopted Clearwater Capital Improvement Program, N'^19/11r—FY2015-16 - FY2019/20 indicates the timing, location and funding of capital projects needed to meet future public facilities' demands and demonstrate that the Comprehensive Plan is financially feasible. Current populations (2998 2015 estimate): 119,831 110.679 Projected 2018 populations (per Future Land use Element): 120,028 SOLID WASTE: Current Capacity: 7.12 lbs per capita per day Current demand: 649 4.89 lbs per capita per day Fiscal Yeas Rrejested senaand E►bs per Pfejested Gapac}ty-flbsi3 SaFPlas (est) 2099119 8-49 7-4-2 4-93 2040144 a 49 742 4-93 2G44 2 5 9 742 4-93 20429Z Sa 9 742 4--93 2813144 &.49 7:4-2 4-.93 5-19 1742 4-93 Fiscal Year Proiected Demand (Ibs per capita r da Projected Capacity (lbs per ca ita per da Surplus Deficit 2015/16 4.89 7.12 2.23 2016/17 4.89 7.12 2.23 2017/18 4.89 7.12 2.23 2018/19 4.89 7.12 2.23 2019/20 4.89 7.12 2.23 Totals 2019/20 4.89 7.12 2.23 Total solid waste generated by the City in 2008 (in tons): 104,898 Current pounds of solid waste per capita per day: 5494.89 "The current capacity is based on the City's solid waste LOS standard. Capacity is actually greater since the City's Solid Waste Department is able to dispose of all waste produced within the City, as it coordinates with Pinellas County and other private facilities and vendors for waste disposal. The majority (80-85%) of all sSolid waste is disposed of at the Pinellas County Solid Waste to Energy Plant where most is incinerated and any remaining material is landfilled. According to the Pinellas County Technical Management Committee, the most recent projections take the life of the county landfill to year 2065. POTABLE WATER: Current capacity: 25 23.5 MGD Current demand: 42.2 1111.4 MGD r�-r�SaiTear . [A04-01420 /179548/11 16 Ordinance No. 8805-16 Fiscal Year Projected Demand Maximum Projected Capacity Minimum Suralus Deficit 2015/16 11.4 20.75 9.36 2016/17 11.4 20.75 9.36 2017/18 11.5 20.75 9.35 2018/19 11.5 20.75 9.35 2019/20 11.6 1 20.75 9.34 Totals (2019/20) 11.6 1 20.75 9.34 MGD = million gallons per day; Projections as per the City's Water Master Plan. Potable water LOS standard: 120 gallons per capita per day Current capacity: Total potable water available per day in gallons: 26,000,008 23,500.000 (25-9 23.5 MGD) Gallens a.,.�bep der day: 22566 Current demand: Total potable water consumption per day in gallons:42 000,000 11.400,000 (42-0 11.4 MGD) Gal;o„s sa„sumed peF capita Per da.,: 198.27 STORMWATER: . _..Ma • . . fi. GuFFentGan pity: 10 yeaF LOS standaFd (Min.)* Gur ent demand 10 yeaF LOS stan.daF d (Min.)* Tviai: 10 yeaF LOS standaF d (Min.)* above. Stormwater LOS Standard: No adverse impacts to existing floodplain elevations and no increase in stormwater flow rate leaving a site. Notes: 1. The City of Clearwater Drainage Design Criteria was updated in September 2015 which specifies the design storms for new development in the City. Design Storm 10 -year storm frequencyfor all new developments for street drainage, storm systems, and culverts 25 -year storm frequency for all new developments for channels and detention areas with outfalls 50 -year storm frequency for all new developments for detention areas without outfalls 100 -year storm frequency for all new developments for detention areas without outfalls which overflow onto private property when capacily is exceeded Design standards for stormwater quality treatment/storage quantity shall conform to the current SWFWMD requirement [Presently being the SCS Unit Hydrograph design method using the design storm frequency and a twenty-four (24) hour duration for sites ten (10) acres or more, and the rational design method for sites under ten (10) acres1l. 2. Development plans are reviewed for stormwater on a permit -by -permit basis. The City only approves a development if it meets the LOS standards per the City's design criteria. 3. Major watersheds within the City Limits with Watershed Master Plans are Alligator Creek, Allen's Creek and Stevenson Creek. The City also includes Coastal Zones 1-4 , the Beach Zone and to a lesser extent, Curlew Creek, Possum Creek, Bishop Creek, and Mullet Creek. 4. In establishing Capital Improvement Projects for City projects, projects are determined through the number of structures removed from the 100 -year floodplain and improvements in roadway level of service with consideration for regional needs and cost benefit. SANITARY SEWER: Current capacity: 257 gallons per capita per day Current demand: 42-7 113 gallons per capita per day Fiscal Year Projected Projected Surplus Demand Capacity (Deficit) Maximum Minimum [A04-01420 /179548/11 18 Ordinance No. 8805-16 2009/40 2015/16 44,412.5 MGD 28.5 MGD 444 16.0 127 gallons per capita per day Current capacity (in gallons): 28,500,000 MGD 201 0/1 1 2016/17 44-212.5 MGD 28.5 MGD 44-.3 16.0 427 22 112.94 PARKLAND: 43-31- 15.46 per MGD 2011 A 22 2017/18 44-212.5 MGD 28.5 MGD 4473 16. Minimum parkland acres to meet adopted LOS: 442.72 4334 15.46 per MGD 2012/13 2018/19 444 12.5 MGD 28.5 MGD 44--2 16.0 X42 2017/18 4 per 1,000 4334 15.46 per MGD ''^'42019/20 44-312.6 MGD 28.5 MGD 44-.2 15.9 2012/13 2018/19 4 per 1,000 4334 15.46 per MGD Totals (2043/44 14.3 MGD 28.5 MGD 44.2 15.9 2019/20) 4 per 1,000 43.4 15.46 per MGD MGD = million gallons per day; Projections as per the City's Water Pollution Control (WPC) Master Plan. Projected Sanitary sewer LOS standard: 127 gallons per capita per day Current capacity (in gallons): 28,500,000 Gallons available per capita per day 2544 257.50 Current demand: 44,100,000 12,500,000 Gallons available per capita per day 427 22 112.94 PARKLAND: 43-31- 15.46 per 9734 11.46 per Current parkland acres: 1,711 Current parkland acres per 1,000 persons 15.46 r tdemand: 4 ..GFes peF 1,000 pe.-sens Minimum parkland acres to meet adopted LOS: 442.72 4334 15.46 per Fiscal Year Prejeeted Projected Surplus- urplus Demand Demand Adopted Capacity -(Deists - Level of Service (Minimum) 20011010 2015/16 4 per 1,000 43-31- 15.46 per 9734 11.46 per 1,000 1,000 2848/41 2016/17 4 per 1,000 4334 15.46 per 944 11.46 per 1,000 1,000 X42 2017/18 4 per 1,000 4334 15.46 per 9,31 11.46 per 1,000 1,000 2012/13 2018/19 4 per 1,000 4334 15.46 per 9:34 11.46 per 1,000 1,000 2043/14 2019/20 4 per 1,000 43.4 15.46 per 9.34 11.46 per 1,000 1,000 Totals 4 per 1,000 4334 15.46 per 9,34 11.46 per 1,000 1,000 Su+,n demand: 440 430.74 asres @ 4—peF 000 inns Total (avres{peF thousand peffiGn ): 1,475 1 711 n s @ 13.31 IE&j-pe 1,000 Rs ROADS: Roadway LOS stan,dnr,d: --- G Ay email. n Peak Hou Arte Fial and nnllentnr roadways ays n ently er��_Fatiting below the a dnntell ggh i.e„r LOS stanidaFd- inslude=The most current edition of the Pinellas County MPO Level of Service Report identifies rnnriwwc nnarntinn with riafiriant lavals of icarvirr: ' [A04-01420 /179548/1] 20 Ordinance No. 8805-16 . ....... OEM M arm MV -1-1. NWrWA T. WAEL [A04-01420 /179548/1] 20 Ordinance No. 8805-16 91-5088 'ON 33UPU 0 [Z 1118b56LU OZ 710-b0A 8L mg mm =man Q7.7im, ==Man . . . . . . . . . . . . w MMMEW Wa SO= NEWMA MMMEM - - -------- mmman F. � Rw [A04-01420 /179548/11 CAPITAL EMPROVEMENT PROGRAM REVENUE SUMMARY FY 2015-16 THROUGH FY 2020/21 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND CITY OF CLEARWATER 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 Total GENERALSOURCES General Revenue 2,836,150 3,003,140 3,256,980 3,129,530 6,981,480 3,043,560 22,250,840 Road Millage 2,060,100 2,060,100 2,060,100 2,060,100 2,060,100 2,060,100 12,360,600 Penny for Pinellas 6,021,820 14,980,060 5,439,840 10,263,460 9,555,250 0 46,260,430 Transportation Impact Fees 190,000 190,000 140,000 140,000 140,000 140,000 940,000 Local Option Gas Tax 1,438,330 1,450,000 0 0 0 0 2,888,330 Special Program Fund 935,000 530,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 1,585,000 Grants - Other Agencies 1,485,000 560,000 80,000 960,000 3,040,000 0 6,125,000 Donations 100,000 50,000 0 0 0 0 150,000 To Be Determined 0 22,397,000 1,483,740 1 929 880 2,227,156 2 223 390 30,261,160 Subtotal General Sources 15,066,400 45,220,300 12,490,660 18,512,970 24,033,980 7,497,050 122,821,360 SELF-SUPPORTING FUNDS Marine Revenue 95,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 445,000 Clearwater Harbor Marina Fund 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 150,000 Aviation Revenue 25,000 155,000 35,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 260,000 Parking Revenue 2,409,000 410,500 406,000 407,500 409,000 409,000 4,451,000 Water Revenue 2,586,000 2,240,470 3,071,000 4,651,000 4,271,000 4,251,000 21,070,470 Sewer Revenue 8,412,830 7,879,280 5,200,960 4,853,500 6,161,480 7,040,510 39,548,560 Water Impact Fees 24,000 24,000 24,000 24,000 24,000 24,000 144,000 Sewer Impact Fees 82,130 12,460 12,460 12,460 12,460 12,460 144,430 Utility R&R 8,667,170 9,205,680 3,939,040 4,030,390 4,030,390 4,367,030 34,239,700 Stormwater Utility Revenue 5,498,550 5,825,100 5,831,860 6,348,450 6,729,430 6,294,000 36,527,390 Gas Revenue 6,050,000 4,050,000 13,850,000 4,050,000 4,050,000 4,050,000 36,100,000 Solid Waste Revenue 535,000 535,000 535,000 535,000 535,000 535,000 3,210,000 Recycling Revenue 90,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 590,000 Subtotal Self -Supporting Funds 34,499,680 30,532,490 33,100,320 25,122,300 26,432,760 27,193,000 176,880,550 INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS Garage Fund Revenue 77,400 79,720 82,110 84,580 87,110 89,730 500,650 Administrative Service Revenue 1,710,000 1 350 000 1,150,000 1 150 000 1,706,860 1 475 000 8,541,860 Subtotal Internal Services Fund 1,787,400 1,429,720 1,232,110 1,234,580 1,793,970 1,564,730 9,042,510 [A04-01420 /179548/1] 26 Ordinance No. 8805-16 BORROWING GENERAL SOURCES Lease Purchase - General Fund 246,000 608,000 2,550,820 643 220 976,950 1,832,800 6 857 790 Subtotal Borrowing/General Sources 246,000 608,000 2,550,820 643,220 976,950 1,832,800 6,857,790 SELF-SUPPORTING FUNDS Lease Purchase - Stormwater 320,000 0 0 0 0 0 320,000 Lease Purchase - Gas 161,000 0 0 0 0 0 161,000 Lease Purchase - Water 60,000 0 0 0 0 0 60,000 ; Lease Purchase - Sewer 109,000 0 700.000 0 0 0 809,000 Future Bond Issue - Water & Sewer 11,867,870 11,378,110 20,987,540 4,433,650 5 365 670 0 54,032,840 Subtotal Borrowing/Self Supporting Funds 12,517,870 11,378,110 21,687,540 4,433,650 5,365,670 0 55,382,840 INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS Lease Purchase - Garage 5,441,000 5,520,440 5,620,850 5,223,270 5,327,730 5,434,290 32,567,580 Lease Purchase - Administrative Services 405,000 405,000 405,000 410,000 410,000 500,000 2,535,000 Subtotal BorrowinglInternal Service Funds 5,846,000 5,925,440 6,025,850 5,633,270 5,737,730 5,934,290 35,102,580 TOTAL: ALL FUNDING SOURCES 69.963.350 95.094.060 77.087.300 55.579.990 64,341,060 44,021,870 406,087,630 Source: 2015 — 2016 Annual Operating Budget and Capital Improvement Budget [A04-01420 /179548/1] 27 Ordinance No. 8805-16 [A04-01420 /179548/1] 28 [A04-01420 /179548/11 28 Ordinance No. 8805-16 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BY FUNCTION FY 2015/16 THROUGH FY 2020/21 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND CITY OF CLEARWATER Schedule of Planned Exaenditures Function 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 Total Police Protection 200,000 3,305,000 0 0 0 0 3,505,000 Fire Protection 1,476,390 4,857,920 3,275,470 4,778,060 1,391,340 2,195,710 17,974,890 Maior Street Maintenance 3,656,430 5,668,100 5,654,850 5,654,850 3,658,850 3,484,850 27,777,930 Sidewalk and Bike Trails 472,000 472,000 472,000 472,000 473,250 473,250 2,834,500 Intersections 335,000 335,000 331,990 315,410 315,400 315,390 1,948,190 Parking 2,389,000 19,482,500 381,000 382,500 384,000 384,000 23,403,000 Miscellaneous Engineering 935,000 535,000 35,000 35,000 2,460,000 35,000 4,035,000 Parks Development 6,735,000 5,037,000 3,564,840 3,325,000 7,125,000 1,440,000 27,226,840 Marine Facilities 410,000 385,000 390,000 390,000 390,000 390,000 2,355,000 Airpark Facilities 65,000 715,000 115,000 1,215,000 3,815,000 15,000 5,940,000 Libraries 115,580 387,350 27,340 462,720 35,000 0 1,027,990 Garage 5,639,400 5,700,160 5,702,960 5,307,850 5,414,840 5,524,020 33,289,230 Maintenance of Buildings 902,000 881,850 794,070 2,161,630 1,084,590 1,045,650 6,869,790 General Public City Building 110,000 522,800 4,646,630 985,650 10,289,100 0 16,554,180 Miscellaneous 2,125,000 5,995,000 1,625,000 1,630,000 1,955,000 2,045,000 15,375,000 Stormwater Utility 5,802,550 5,714,380 4,751,150 6,174,320 4,999,690 6,294,000 33,736,090 Gas System 6,211,000 4,050,000 13,850,000 4,050,000 4,050,000 4,050,000 36,261,000 Solid Waste & Recycling 625,000 635,000 635,000 635,000 635,000 635,000 3,800,000 Utilities Miscellaneous 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 120,000 Sewer System 24,469,000 23,260,000 16,260,000 11,400,000 10,200,000 10,150,000 95,739,000 Water System 7,270,000 7 135 000 14,555,000 6,185,000 5 645 000 5,525,000 46 315 000 69,963,350 95,094,060 77,087,300 55,579,990 64,341,060 44,021,870 406,087,630 Source: City of Clearwater Ordinance 8768-15, Exhibit B [A04-01420 /179548/1] 29 Ordinance No. 8805-16 [A04-01420 /179548/1] 30 Section 31. Should any part or provision of this Ordinance be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the Ordinance as a whole, or any part thereof other than the part declared to be invalid. Section 32. This ordinance shall become effective when the Department of Economic Opportunity issues a final order determining the adopted amendment to be in compliance, or the Administration Commission issues a final order determining the adopted amendments to be in compliance, in accordance with Section 163.3184, F.S., as amended. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Approved as to form: Camilo Soto Assistant City Attorney [A04-01420 /179548/11 r COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD Clearw - PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ' STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: December 15, 2015 AGENDA ITEM: F.1 CASE: CPA2015-04001 ORDINANCE NO.: 8805-16 REQUEST: Review and recommendation to the City Council, of amendments to the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan repealing transportation concurrency, establishing a Mobility Management System, allowing for non-contiguous annexations, amending certain provisions of the Capital Improvements Element for consistency with State Statutes, and updating various terms and references. INITIATED BY: City of Clearwater, Planning and Development Department BACKGROUND: The City of Clearwater Comprehensive Plan includes several policies addressing concurrency management in the Future Land Use, Transportation, Coastal Management, and Capital Improvements elements. The application of concurrency management requirements through the local site plan review process, including the assessment of transportation impact fees, is the primary tool the City and other municipalities in Pinellas County use to manage the traffic impacts of development projects. Concurrency management requirements are imposed to ensure that permits are not issued for a development project without the public facilities and services necessary to handle its impacts being in place. Concurrency management rules also require local governments to adopt level of service standards for public services and facilities that must be maintained as a condition of development approval. The City has adopted levels of service for transportation, solid waste, sanitary sewer, stormwater, potable water, hurricane evacuation, and parks. Most impact fees are established within the Code of Ordinances, but transportation impact fees are established by the Pinellas County Code Chapter 150-40 (the Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance, or TIFO), and are applied countywide. The 2011 Community Planning Act made substantial amendments to Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, including repealing state mandated transportation concurrency. To address these changes, the Pinellas County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) coordinated with the various local governments to develop an alternative approach to transportation concurrency which would also further the development of a countywide multi -modal transportation system that could better accommodate travel options other than the personal automobile. The Pinellas County Mobility Plan was approved by the MPO in 2013, and model policies were adopted in 2014. The Pinellas County Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) approved on first reading amendments to their impact fee ordinance, changing the name to Multi -Modal Impact Fee Ordinance and creating a Mobility Management System within its land development regulations, in October 2014. It is anticipated that the Pinellas County BOCC's amendments will be adopted on March 29, 2016. The City, along with municipalities throughout the County, is amending its Comprehensive Plan and land development regulations to remain consistent with the countywide approach to mobility management and the TIFO. 0 CleafWater Community Development Code Text Amendment PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION The Mobility Management System that is envisioned through the new policies within this amendment would be a more flexible approach to manage the traffic impacts of development projects while increasing mobility for pedestrians, bicyclists, transit users and motor vehicles. The Mobility Management System, which is proposed to be established within the Community Development Code (see concurrent case TA2015-10006), will be a tiered development review approach requiring larger scale projects adding trips to the surrounding road network to implement transportation management strategies in -lieu of or as credit toward their impact fee assessment. These strategies could include, but are not limited to, trail, sidewalk, bus stop and intersection improvements or trip reduction programs such as carpooling or telecommuting. Smaller scale projects with limited impact on the transportation system would only be required to pay an impact fee commensurate with the number of new trips they generate. The main purpose of the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments is to repeal transportation concurrency and set up the policy framework necessary to establish a Mobility Management System, and to remove references to transportation concurrency throughout the Comprehensive Plan. Other amendments are proposed to recognize the 2014 Interlocal Service Boundary Agreement (ISBA) between Pinellas County and municipalities, which allows voluntary annexation of non-contiguous parcels located in an enclave surrounded by city property on all sides ("Type A" Enclaves). Additionally, the Coastal Management Element is updated to address new statutory requirements by adding policies that encourage new development to find solutions to help reduce the flood risk or flood losses and that require new development or redevelopment be consistent with or more stringent than Florida Building Code requirements. These policies add to existing policies addressing reduction of flood risk, as required by Chapter 163. Lastly, the proposed amendments include updates to the Capital Improvements Element. Many changes are minor, including updates to reflect the most recent studies and capital improvements programs established by the MPO, Florida Department of Transportation, and the City. The Schedule of Capital Improvements is being replaced to reflect the current five-year projections and updated Revenue Summary and Program Expenditure tables for Fiscal Years 2015-2020. ANALYSIS: Substantial changes are being made to the Transportation Element, including the addition of policies pertaining to the establishment of a Mobility Management System, and the removal of language pertaining to transportation concurrency. Amendments to the Future Land Use, Coastal Management, Intergovernmental Coordination, and Capital Improvements Elements include removing obsolete language, updating language to be consistent with the proposed Mobility Management System, and adding policies regarding noncontiguous annexations and flood risk and loss prevention as previously stated. Formatting changes are also being made to bring consistency among all of the elements. The proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan are summarized below: 1. Future Land Use Element [pages 2-4 of ordinance]: Simplifies the goal and objective for the Concurrency Management System; revises policies to remove transportation from concurrency requirements; updates the services for which levels of service have been adopted; adds review criteria for Future Land Use Map and/or Zoning Atlas amendments; and adds a policy to allow voluntary annexations of non-contiguous properties within "Type A" Enclaves. Community Development Board — December 15, 2015 CPA2015-04001 — Page 2 'J, PLANNING DEVELOPMENTClearWater CommunityDevelopment Code Text Amendment DEVELOPMENT R�VEV j?JVA$JQY 2. Transportation Element [pages 4-10 of ordinance]: Establishes the new Mobility Management System and related policies; adds- a policy that includes transportation analysis for planning purposes; revises Objective B.1.2 and its policies to provide direction to use complete street policies when making improvements to the road network; removes references to transportation concurrency and replaces with references to the Mobility Management System; adds more policies regarding coordination with the MPO and FDOT; simplifies policies related to coordination with PSTA to identify public transit improvements; and updates various terms and plan years to most current editions. 3. Coastal Management Element [pages 10-11 of ordinance]: Removes reference to "traffic" as a required level of service objective and adds policies that aim to reduce flood risk and flood losses. 4. Intergovernmental Coordination Element [page 11 of ordinance]: Removes level of service requirement for road improvements; and adds a policy addressing coordination with FDOT with regards to access on State facilities for new development projects. 5. Capital Improvements Element [pages 11-28 of ordinance]: Removes the outdated Needs Summary; removes transportation from concurrency requirements and level of service requirements; adds reference to the Mobility Management System; updates the Schedule of Capital Improvements to the most recent five-year projections; updates the Revenue Summary and the Program Expenditures tables to the most recent five-year projections; and updates various terms and references. STANDARDS FOR REVIEW: Pursuant to Community Development Code Section 4-603.F., no amendment to the Comprehensive Plan shall be approved unless it complies with the following standards: 1. The amendment will further implementation of the Comprehensive Plan consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives contain in the plan. The proposed amendments to the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan are consistent with the following Objectives Policies in the Plan: Policy A.6.5.3 All proposed development/redevelopment initiatives shall be reviewed for opportunities to improve pedestrian and bicycle access and consider the integration of bicycle and pedestrian transportation modes in all phases of transportation planning, new roadway design, roadway construction, roadway resurfacing, and other capital projects consistent with the City's Shifting Gears Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan 2006. On Clearwater Beach, pedestrian and bicycle improvements should adhere to the policies and design guidelines set forth in Beach by Design: A preliminary Design for Clearwater Beach and Design Guidlelines. Community Development Board — December 15, 2015 CPA2015-04001 — Page 3 a Clearwater CommunityDevelopment Code Text Amendment PLANNING &DEVELOPMENT P DEVELOPMENT RE _W DJ,V�.$JQN Objective A.6.8 Identify those areas of the City that are appropriate for redevelopment as livable communities and require that specific sustainable elements to be used in the redevelopment of these areas. Objective H.3.1 The City shall continue to work with the PPC, the State, and the County in the orderly annexation of the City's existing enclaves. The Mobility Management System proposed within new Objective B.1.1 and its associated policies looks to improve the transportation network for all users, including pedestrians, bicyclists, and public transit. Proposed Objective B.1.2 includes a policy that references Objective A.6.8, as well as other policies that further Objective A.6.8 related to Complete Streets, sidewalks, and other livable community improvements. The addition of voluntary non-contiguous "Type A" annexations allows those properties in "Type A" enclaves to not have to wait until they become contiguous to City limits to annex into the City. As such, the proposed amendments will further implementation of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. 2. The amendment is not inconsistent with other provisions of the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed amendments are not in conflict with other provisions of the Comprehensive Plan and bring further consistency between the goals, objectives, and policies and the map series. The proposed amendment will add several new objectives and policies to the Comprehensive Plan, while also simplifying other sections of the Plan. Proposed Objective B.1.1 and related policies expand the ways the city is addressing the impacts of new development on its transportation system that increases mobility for pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit users as well as for motorists. The new Mobility Management System objective and policies tie in with various Future Land Use Element policies, specifically the livable communities objective and policies which are captured in Objective A.6.8. Several proposed amendments address intergovernmental coordination between the City and other entities such as the MPO and PSTA. 3. The available uses, if applicable, to which the property may be put are appropriate to the property in question and compatible with existing and planned uses in the area. This is not applicable to the proposed amendments as they do not relate to a specific property or properties. 4. Sufficient public facilities are available to serve the property. The adequacy of available public facilities will need to be assessed on a case-by-case basis as development proposals are received. The proposed amendments repeal transportation concurrency, however, new policies are being created that will maintain level of service as a planning tool that will be used to evaluate potential development proposals at the time of site plan review. Therefore, this is not applicable as the proposed amendments do not relate to a specific property or properties. 5. The amendment will not adversely affect the natural environment. This is not applicable to the proposed amendments. The amendments reflect updates to the state statutes and to recently approved local ordinances. Any proposed development will have to comply with Community Development Board — December 15, 2015 CPA2015-04001 — Page 4 10 ChfWatef Community Development Code Text Amendment PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW RdV��QN impervious surface ratio standards, tree preservation and landscaping requirements, and drainage and water quality requirements, which is evaluated at the time of site plan review. 6. The amendment will not adversely impact the use of property in the immediate area. This is not applicable to the proposed amendments as they do not relate to a specific property or properties. Any impacts would be determined at the time of site plan review, and would need to be mitigated before any development can proceed. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The purpose of this amendment is to update the Future Land Use, Transportation, Intergovernmental Coordination, and Capital Improvements Elements to reflect changes to the state statutes; to establish an objective and policies for the Mobility Management System; and to recognize the 2014 Interlocal Service Boundary Agreement between the City, Pinellas County, and other municipalities, all of which have been adopted since the last major update to the Comprehensive Plan in 2008. The proposed amendment is consistent with and will further the goals, objectives, and policies of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan, will not result in inappropriate or incompatible uses, will not adversely affect the natural environment or impact the use of property in the immediate area, and sufficient public facilities exist to implement the proposed amendment. Based upon the above, the Planning and Development Department recommends APPROVAL of Ordinance No. 8805-16 that amends the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. Prepared by Planning and Development Department Staff: Kyle Broth Planner ATTACHMENTS: Resume Ordinance No. 8805-16 Community Development Board — December 15, 2015 CPA2015-04001 —Page 5 ORDINANCE NO. 8805-16 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER (THE CITY), FLORIDA, AMENDING THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN BY AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT UPDATING THE CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND ALLOWING FOR NON-CONTIGUOUS ANNEXATIONS; BY AMENDING THE TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT ESTABLISHING A MOBILITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND REPEALING TRANSPORTATION CONCURRENCY, ESTABLISHING MULTI -MODAL DESIGN FEATURES, AND ENSURING THE CITY'S COORDINATION WITH THE METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION AND THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION; BY AMENDING THE COASTAL MANGEMENT ELEMENT BY REMOVING TRAFFIC FROM LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS AND ADDING POLICIES ENCOURAGING STRATEGIES AND ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS THAT REDUCE FLOOD RISK IN COASTAL AREAS; BY AMENDING THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT REMOVING REFERENCE TO ROAD LEVEL OF SERVICE; BY AMENDING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT REMOVING TRANSPORTATION LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS AND UPDATING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND EXPENDITURE AND REVENUE SUMMARIES; UPDATING VARIOUS TERMS AND REFERENCES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act of Florida empowers and requires the City Council of the City of Clearwater to plan for the future development and growth of the City, and to adopt and periodically amend the Comprehensive Plan, including elements and portions thereof; and WHEREAS, Florida House Bill 7207, also known as the Community Planning Act, was signed into law in 2011; and WHEREAS, the Community Planning Act removed State requirements for local government implementation of transportation concurrency management systems; and WHEREAS, the City of Clearwater participated in a multi jurisdictional Mobility Plan Task Force, facilitated by the Pinellas County Metropolitan Planning Organization, to develop a framework for a countywide approach to implementation of a mobility management system in place of transportation concurrency; and WHEREAS, the City of Clearwater desires to replace transportation concurrency with a mobility management system approach that is multi -modal, and designed to better support redevelopment and associated transportation, land use, intergovernmental, and capital improvement goals; and WHEREAS, additional amendments are proposed to address an Interlocal Service Boundary Agreement (ISBA) the city and Pinellas County entered into which allows voluntary annexations of noncontiguous properties within "Type A" enclaves, as defined in the ISBA; and WHEREAS, such ISBA should be recognized in the Comprehensive Plan; and ] Ordinance No. 8805-16 WHEREAS, the City Council finds it necessary, desirable and proper to adopt the amendments to the objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan in order to reflect changing conditions; now, therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. That Policy A.2.2.6 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Element, page A-10, be amended to read as follows: A.2.2.6 The Community Development Code shall provide for safe on-site traffic circulation and connections to adjacent arterial and collector streets consistent with Florida Department of Transportation-and_lnstitute of Traffic Engineers design guidelines, �Y , and other applicable roadway design standards, policies, and ulde in Section 2. That Goal A.4 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Element, and its Objective and Policies, pages A-11 through A-12, be amended to read as follows: A.4 GOAL — THE CITY SHALL IN TWE APPLICABLE c-uNrTIONA.1 PI RK TOWARD A LAND USE PATTERN THAT CAN BE SUPPORTED BY THE AVAILABLE COMMUNITY AND PUBLIC FACILITIES THAT WOULD BE REQUIRED TO SERVE THE DEVELOPMENT. A.4.1 Objective - The City shall examine and upgrade the COAGUFFeney Management an shall Gonfinue to Gens-deF the GUFrent, inteFiM, and ultimately desired Levels GIF which servoees aFe adequate to seFve existing and planned new development: This level of serymee status will be considered and made part ef the staff FeGemmendation at the time of zening, site plan, OF plat approval. The level of seNiGe Menitering system shall be acqusted, at a Fninimum, annually to determine adequary.of seNiGe sapasity. The City's Concurrency Management System will ensure the compatibility of all proposed development with the capacities of the existing and planned support facilities for which a level of service has been adopted. Should a requerAed development permit result on approvals whiGh would bUFden - . ystems above adopted levels, peFmissien to PFOGeed with thf wall not be qFanted until the Gity has assUFed that adequate seFViGes will be available eenGlUlffent with the imparats of development. Policies A.4.1.1 No new develepMent 9F Fedeyeloprnent will be peffAitted whiGh Gauses the level 9f City seFyiGes (Mads, Fer.FeatieR and open spaGe, wateF, sewage ti:eatment� 2 Ordinance No. 8805-16 The Concurrency Management System shall ensure proposed development is in conformance with existing and planned support facilities for which a level of service standard has been adopted and that such facilities and services are available, at the adopted level of service standards, concurrent with the impacts of Bevelonmetl camment(xl�zf: Gonc�,rrrncy magemeoi,g stat used for Rap, potable water, sewer garbagex_ A41.2 The City's Concurrency Management System shall include, at minimum, level of 9 Y sndsturmwater Thealeasavaued3Osw�ttun tt�e�code 1 -. f A& - service standards for parkland, potable water, sanitary sewer, solid waste, and stormwater. A.4.1.3 The City, when making decisions on requests to amend the Future Land Use Map or the Zoning Atlas (other than decisions on appropriate locations for mixed-use or transit oriented development), shall review the potential impact on the transportation system by considering the following: a. Ability of the surrounding existing and planned transportation network to meet the mobility objectives of the Comprehensive Plan: b. Capacity of the surrounding existing and planned transportation network to accommodate any projected additional demand: and c. Extent to which the proposed Future Land Use Map amendment or rezoning furthers the intent of the Comprehensive Plan to improve mobility. A.4.1.24 The City shall recognize the overriding Constitutional principle that private property shall not be taken without due process of law and the payment of just compensation, which principle is restated in Section 163.3194 (4) (a), Florida Statutes. Section 3. That Policy A-5.4.8 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Element, page A-14, be amended to read as follows: A.5.4.8 Study the establishment 9f tFanspeRatien G9AGSUFFenray alteMatives Use the City's - Mobility Management System, as established in the City's Community Development Code, support higher densities alon_g_redeyelop Tent corridors and -------------------- _-- Cominrt[Ra�3�oAislsrherApoiaon ': in activity centers. Section 4. That Policy A.7-1.2 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Element, page A-24, be amended to read as follows: A.7.1.2 When evaluating and prioritizing areas to annex, consideration should be given to the following: • Whether property was given high priority in the City's Sewer System Expansion Feasibility Study Update completed in 2982 2011; 3 Ordinance No. 8805-16 Section 5. That a new Policy A.7.2.4 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Element, page A-25, be added, with subsequent Policies renumbered, and that Policy A.7.2.6, as renumbered, be amended to fix a typographical ____________________________________ A.7.2.4 Aliow voluntary annexations for noncontiguous properties that are within an enclave as defined by Section 171.032(13)(x), Florida Statutes ("Type A" enclaves). A.7.2.45 Promote economic development programs and activities to businesses within the unincorporated areas of the Clearwater Planning Area. A.7.2.66 Continue to work with property owners and Pinellas County to permit development activities in the County prior to the effective date of annexation provided the proposed development complies with the provisions of the City of Clearwater Development Code. Section 6. That the Transportation Needs Summary section of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element, page B-1, be amended to read as follows: Traffic Circulation & Mobility Multi -modal transportation improvements to Clearwater Beach should continue to be planned and/or utilized to alleviate traffic congestion and parking demands on the Memorial Causeway and the beach. Access management to improve traffic flow will continue to be an important issue in development reviews, with particular emphasis on congested links. Belleair Road (CR462) and Clearwater Memorial Causeway (SR60) �' physically and/or environmentally constrained and we'! eentinue to epeFate belew the aGGeptable levels of serv*G-e-. The City will continue to work with Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), Tampa. Bay Area Regional Transportation Authority (TBARTA), Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority (PSTA) and other agencies to . create and maintain a multi -modal transportation system that is safe and efficient for all users, including bicyclists, pedestrians and transit users, as well as motorists. Ordinance No. 8805-16 Section 7. That the Traffic Circulation section of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element, page B-3, be renamed as follows: TRAFFIC CIRCULATION & MOBILITY Section 8. That Goal B.1 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element, page B-3, be amended and a new Objective B.1.1 and its Policies be added to read as follows, with subsequent Objectives and Policies renumbered: B.1 GOAL - TI IE TRAFFIC CIRCULATION SYSTEM THE CITY SHALL PROVIDE FOR THE A SAFE,_ CONVENIENT AND ENERGY EFFICIENT 5C61YERvY OF PEOPLE AND MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM THAT SERVES TO B.1.1 Obiective — Maintain the maior road network performance within the City while furthering development of a multi -modal transportation system that increases mobility for pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit users as well as for motorists. Policies B.1.1.1 The City shall establish a Mobility Management System within the City's Community Development Code. Impacts of land development proiects shall be managed through the application of Transportation Element policies, through requirements of the Community Development Code, and through the site plan review process. The Mobility Management System shall address the following: a. b. trips of deficient roads shall be classified as tier 1 and required to submit a transportation management plan (TMP) designed to address their impacts while increasing mobility and reducing demand for single occupant vehicle travel. c. Development projects that generate more than 300 new peak hour trips on deficient roads shall be classified as ter 2, required to conduct a traffic impact study, and submit an accompanying report and TMP based on the report findings. d. Multi -modal impact fee assessments may be applied as credit toward the cost of a TMP. e. A traffic study and/or TMP for a development project not impacting a deficient road corridor shall be required if necessary to address the impact of additional trips generated by the project on the surrounding traffic circulation system. 8.1.1.2 The City shall continue to use roadway levels of service for planning purposes. 5 6.1.1.4 The City shall utilize multi -modal impact fee revenue to fund multi -modal improvements to local countv, or state facilities that are consistent with the -tNtin� tl ftli Tari s well as the MPO Long Range Transportation Plan 2040. 13.1.1.5 The City shall work cooperatively with the MPO and other local governments to complete the biennial update of the Mufti -modal Impact Fee Ordinance through the MPO planning process. 8.1.1.6 The City shall continue to work with the Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority (PSTA) to increase the efficiency of the fixed -route system by encouraging mass transit use through the application of the Mobility Management System and the City's site plan review process. Section 9. That Objective B.1.2 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element, as renumbered by this ordinance, page B-3, and its Policies be amended, and Policies 6.1.2.3 through 6.1.2.8 be added to read as follows, with subsequent Objectives and Policies renumbered: B.1.42 Objective — Future improvements to arterial and collector streets shall be context -sensitive by planning and designing the roadway based on the existing context of the surrounding built environment and the planned land use vision. 6.1:42.1 The City shall continue to administer access management and right-of-way requirements through the Community Development Code. 13.1.42.2 The City will promote programs that ensure physical safety of non -motorized transportation users in accordance with the City's Shifting Gears: Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan. 6.1.2.3 The Citv will operate, maintain, and improve the Citv transportation system consistent with the Florida Department of Transportation's (FDOT) Complete Streets Policy. 6.1.2.4 The City shall coordinate efforts with FDOT to incorporate bicycle and pedestrian - friendly provisions in the design and construction of expansion and resurfacing projects on State roads, where feasible. 8.1.2.5 The City shall re uire land development probects to make adequate provisions for bicycle parking and storage s:a "ro nate 8.1.2.6 The City shall include sidewalks where feasible alongside roadways scheduled for resurfacing. B.1.2.7 The City shall install landscaping along sidewalks using tree canopy, where feasible, to provide shaded areas for pedestrians. 8.1.2.8 The City shall incorporate livable community requirements such as Objective A.6.8 and its Policies to proposed developments or redevelopments. Ordinance No. 8805-16 rte........... -- Section 10. That Objective B.1.3 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element, pages B-3 and B-4, and its Policies be amended as follows: B.1.34 Objective - The City will continue to monitor traffic counts, accidents, and road improvements, to provide timely status evaluation of level of service conditions4er of development approvals. Policies 8.1.344.1 Requests feF amendment t9 the F-utUFe Land Use Map will have an analysis ef tFa +a�parts. The City shall continue to review potential trips generated by Future Land Use Map amendments and Zoning Atlas Amendments based upon the Mobili management vstbrd- B.1.34.32 The sepsuFreacy Mobility fnManagement 6Sjystem will be eAhaaeed applied through improved departmental coordination. and the PFGaGtiVP. and Section 11. That Policies B.1.4.1 through 8.1.4.7 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element, pages B-4 and B-5, be amended to read as follows: Policies 8.1.45.1 The City shall continue to review trips generated by land development projects through the Mobility Management System. 8.1.45.2 For those roads which are not currently operating at an acceptable LOS, or which do not have pFegrammed impFevements to upgFade sepvise to an aGeeptable leyel a mitigating improvement scheduled for construction within three years, the senr.UFFeasy Mobili rnManagement sSystem shall be used to monitor traffic growth, with the dual intent of maintaining average operating speeds and restricting the aggregate and individual trips generated by development in the City limits. 7 Ordinance No. 8805-16 B.1.45.53 Redevelopment and/or revitalization projects shall be coordinated with the FDOT and the Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO) to assess impacts on US 19. B.1.45.7-4 The City shall cooperate with the MPO to ensure consistency between comprehensive plan amendments and the Pinellas MPO Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) 2026 2040. Section 12. That Objective B.1.5 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element, page B-5, and its Policies be deleted: Ordinance No. 8805-16 Section 13. That Objective B.2.1 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element, page B-6, be amended, and Policies 8.2.1.2 and B.2.1.3 be added to read as follows: B.2.1 Objective - Roadway improvements to obtain desiped Leyels of SeFviGe must be included in State, County, and City capital budgets. The City shall actively participate, on a continuing basis, with both the staff and elected official support, in the preparation, adoption and implementation of transportation plans and expenditure programs of the M.P.O. MPO, P.S.T:A. PSTA, Board of County Commissioners, and the F.D.O.T FDOT. - B.2.1.1 The City shall review and comment on the proposed capital improvement programs and provide input to the adopting agencies relative to consistency with Clearwater's Comprehensive Plan. 8.2.1.2 The City shall provide the MPO with available up-to-date traffic data, such as signal timings and traffic counts to assist with level-of-service monitoring and development of the MPO's Long Range Transportation Plan. 8.2.1.3 The City shall continue to participate with the MPO and/or its Technical Coordinating Committee (TCC) to ensure that the level of service standards for US Highway 19. a Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) facility, is consistent with FDOT's LOS designation of D for this road. Section 14. That Objective B.2.3 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element, page B-8, be amended, and that Policy 8.2.3.2 be deleted as follows: B.2.3 Objective - The City of Clearwater shall annually update the City's TFanspeFtatien and coordinate with and provide input in the update of the Metropolitan Planning Organization's (MPO) Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) involving County and State roads. The fellewiRg tFanspeFtati it pFejeGtS that will enhance FGad GapaGity aFe sGheduled feir ren-nmthrunattine.n. within City, Gounty and State • Sunset129t Read—US 19A to Keene Read GGURt • Mr.Mullen Reef, Read at DFewStreet County SuFnmaFyi GORStFUGt southbound �ight tum lane and extend left tuFn lanes • MeMulien Booth Read at Read County US Hag y 19 FFGM: N of Whitney Rd. to S of Seville Blvd. State • US Highway 19 FF^vM.! v of Seville Blvd to N of SR an --Sate Policies 9 Ordinance No. 8805-16 6:2.3.1 Road improvements which are currently programmed for construction should be continued in the Capital Improvement Element of the jurisdiction having operational responsibility for those roads. Section 15. That Objective 13.4.4 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element, page B-14, and Policies 13.4.4.1 and 13.4.4.2 be amended to read as follows: - wA , _ 3bjectrve The tarty shad parfacrpata ar�d cooperate wrttr ac ncies an commrtCees o ehhaceand combt �F .. �ys��publrc..Crar'rsportatrn V tem; Section 16. That Objective E.1.5 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Coastal Management Element, page E-5, be amended to read as follows: E.1.5 Objective - Ltevel of service standards as defined in the functional elements of the Comprehensive Plan (traffic, public utilities, recreation and open space), are established and are recognized as applicable to the coastal storm area. Section 17. That Objective E.1.6 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Coastal Management Element, page E-5, be amended to read as follows, and that new Policies E.1.6.2 and E.1.6.3 be added to read as follows, with subsequent Policies renumbered: E.1.6 Objective - Development and Rredevelopment areas established in the coastal storm area should address the needs and opportunities unique to those locations. E.1.6.1 Redevelopment proposals and plans shall be reviewed for compliance with the goals, objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan and other appropriate plans including Beach by Design: A Preliminary Design for Clearwater Beach and Design Guidelines and the City's NFIP Community Rating. System Floodplain Management Plan. E.1.6.2 New development or redevelopment is encouraged to include principles, strategies, or engineering solutions that: a. reduce the flood risk in the coastal areas which results -from _high -tide events storm surge flash floods, stormwater runoff, and the related impacts of sea -level rise• b. may reduce losses due to flooding and claims made under flood insurance policies issued in this state. .10 Ordinance No. 8805-16 E.1.6.3 New development or redevelopment shall be consistent with, or more stringent than, the flood -resistant construction requirements in the Florida Building Code and applicable flood plain management regulations set forth in 44 C.F.R. part 60. Section 18. That the Intergovernmental Coordination Needs Summary of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Intergovernmental Coordination Element, page H-1, be amended to read as follows: Intergovernmental Coordination Needs Summary The following summarizes the Intergovernmental Coordination Element: • Road improvements; and backlogged facilities, and levels of serviee need the coordination of all jurisdictions along the corridor in establishing and maintaining appropriate land use and traffic policies. Coordination with the Florida Department of Transportation(FDOT) is also a major issue to be addressed by continued participation in the M -P -O- process. In addition, Clearwater should continue to be involved with the Tampa Bay Area Regional Transportation Authority (TBARTA)lap nning process. Section 19. That Objective H.2.2 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Intergovernmental Coordination Element, page H-4, and its Policies be amended, and Policy H.2.2.3 be added to read as follows: H.2.2 Objective - The City shall adopt the F.D:A� FDOT 'eve! ofv;re standards for State primary and secondary arterials as they may be modified by additional service designations (special transportation areas, etc.) approved by I`9:G.T. MOT and shall use intergovernmental coordination agreements to secure maximum City control over access and management of roads in Clearwater. Policies H.2.2.1 The City shall continue to cooperate with F, D.G.T. FDOT in all matters of traffic signal access requests that affect the State highway system. H.2.2.2 Clearwater shall provide F, D.^. FDOT with annual reports that document efforts at concurrency management on State roads. H.2.2.3 The City will consult with FDOT with regard to the access onto State facilities for new land developmenty6ects. Section 20. That the Capital Improvements Element Needs Summary of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element, page 1-1, be deleted as follows: Capital IMPFevements Element Needs SuFnFnafy annually by the City GeunGil: I I Ordinance No. 8805-16 The $2.6 millien BaysheFe BouleyaFd Realignment PFGjeGt is planned in FY2012ilg. Thus PFqjeGt will eliminate a dangemus ruFve just neFth of Drew StFeet on heavily tFaveled BaysheFe BeuleyaFd. Funding is Penny feF Pinellas 11'. - The Gity's Strpptc; Rnd Sidewalks PFOgFaFn is rauFfently budgeted feF $41.166 million in the sk- The Gity pmpeses a total of $29.709 millien of impFavements within the City's Sten:Awa Waste funds. The $1.2 million ReGlaimed WateF DistFibution System GIP pFgjeGt is being funded thFough wa funds. mmilmen fFgFn SeweF !FnpaGt, $4.104 million thF9Ugh Wility Renewal and ReplasemeAt, and $4.142 The $23.883 million PaFks Development PFejeGtS eveF the six yeaF GIP peFied aFe being fund Events Revenue. Section 21. That Objective 1.1.1 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element, page 1-2, and. Policies 1.1.1.2, 1.1.1.5, 1.1.1.9, 1.1.1.11, and 1.1.1.12 be amended to read as follows: 1.1.1 Objective — The Capital Improvements Element (CIE) of the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Clearwater shall be reviewed and adapted annually in light of the needs addressed in various elements of the Comprehensive Plan including the fifth year needs of eash subsequent adeption. 1.1.1.2 The Aannual Update to the Five -Year Schedule of Capital Improvements Sapital is hereby incorporated by reference and is located following. pPolicy 1.1.6.3. 1.1.1.5 Capital improvements projects proposed for inclusion in the schedule of capital improvements should be evaluated on the following criteria and considered in the priority listed below: 1.1.1.9 As stated in the City Charter, the total indebtedness of the City of Clearwater, which for the purpose of this limitation shall include revenue, refunding and improvement bonds, shall not exceed twenty percent (20%) of the current assessed valuation of all real property located in the City;; ^tee. Ttotal budgeted expenditures in any fiscal year shall not exceed the total estimated revenue plus any unencumbered funds carried forward from a prior fiscal year. 12 Ordinance No. 8805-16 xxxxx 1.1.1.11 . The City will coordinate with the FDOT and the Pinellas County MPO to promote the inclusion of projects in the plans and programs of these agencies into the Five -Year Schedule of Capital Improvements. 1.1.1.12 en june 9, 2010, Section 22. That Policy 1.1.3.1 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element, page 1-5, be amended to read as follows: 1.1.3.1 Essential public facilities as defined in this plan include and are limited to those facilities relating to sanitary sewer, solid waste, stormwater, potable water, transpertatierand parks and recreation systems. xxxxx Section 23. That Policy 1.1.3.3 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element, page 1-5, be amended to read as follows: 1.1.3.3 If it is determined that sufficient capacity of essential public facilities will be available concurrent with the impacts of a proposed development, a final development order may be issued in accordance with the following schedule: that results in tFaffiG geneFation. Section 24. That Table: Summary of Level of Service Standards in Policy 1.1.3.7 Capital Improvements Element, of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan, page 1-7, be amended to read as follows: Table: Summary of Level of Service Standards Facilities Element LOS Standard T-FaAspeFtatleR TFanspeFtation Sanitary Sewer Utilities Average of 127gallons per person per day GPCD Solid Waste Utilities Average Solid Waste Generator Rate of 7.12 pounds per capita per da Stormwater Utilities Design storm: 10 — year storm frequency for all new street development using the rational design method 25 — year frequency with positive outfall for major storm systems with basin time of intensities controlling the duration.* 50 — year storm frequency when no outfall and discharge is to street right-of-way.* 13 Ordinance No. 8805-16 4 Section 25. That a new Policy 1.1.4.8 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element, page 1-8, be added to read as follows: Policies 1.1.4.8 The City will continue to use roadway level of service for planning purposes. Section 26. That Policy 1.1.5.1 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element, page 1-8, be deleted as follows, and that Policy 1.1.5.4, page 1-9, be amended to read as follows, with Policies renumbered: Policies 1.4.6.4 in 1990, the City instituted a GORGUFFenGy management GFdiRaFIGe fGF the GGGupanGy. The City shall Gonfinue to weFk with Pinellas County MPO on updates4o the LOS Fepert to ensure the eenfiAued FnenitWing of the LOS USiRg data availa # 'f}l he Mnputedzed trafffiG 6igRal system. This system shall Rtin.,e to i ,.!U �e 1.1.5.21 The City shall recognize the overriding Constitutional principle that private property shall not be taken without due process of law and the payment of just compensation, which principle is restated in Section 163.3194 (4) (a) Florida Statutes. 14 Ordinance No. 8805-16 100 — year storm frequency when no outfall and discharge is across private property.* * Design standards for stormwater quality treatment/storage quantity shall conform to the current SWFWMD requirement [Presently being the SCS Unit Hydrograph design method, using the design storm frequency and a twenty-four (24) hour duration for sites ten (10) acres or more, and the rational design method for sites under ten 10 acres]. Potable Water Utilities Average Water Consumption Rate and Natural 120 gallons per capita per day at a pressure of Ground Water 40-45 psi.* Aquifer *Continue to maintain water consumption of Recharge one hundred twenty (120) GPCPD or less as per the conditions set forth by Clearwater's Water Use Permit. Hurricane Coastal 16 hours (out of county for a category 5 -storm Evacuation Management event as measured on the Saffir-Simpson scale Parks Recreation 4 acres of parkland per one thousand (1,000) and Open persons for Citywide application Space Section 25. That a new Policy 1.1.4.8 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element, page 1-8, be added to read as follows: Policies 1.1.4.8 The City will continue to use roadway level of service for planning purposes. Section 26. That Policy 1.1.5.1 of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element, page 1-8, be deleted as follows, and that Policy 1.1.5.4, page 1-9, be amended to read as follows, with Policies renumbered: Policies 1.4.6.4 in 1990, the City instituted a GORGUFFenGy management GFdiRaFIGe fGF the GGGupanGy. The City shall Gonfinue to weFk with Pinellas County MPO on updates4o the LOS Fepert to ensure the eenfiAued FnenitWing of the LOS USiRg data availa # 'f}l he Mnputedzed trafffiG 6igRal system. This system shall Rtin.,e to i ,.!U �e 1.1.5.21 The City shall recognize the overriding Constitutional principle that private property shall not be taken without due process of law and the payment of just compensation, which principle is restated in Section 163.3194 (4) (a) Florida Statutes. 14 Ordinance No. 8805-16 1.1.5.32 In the planning of capital improvements, the City shall consider the effect of such improvement on local resources listed on the National Register of Historic Places with the intent to preserve the integrity of such places. 1.1.5.43 In the planning of capital improvements, the City shall consider the effects of controversial public facilities, such as landfills, prisons, and power lines, with the intent of locating them in areas where they may best serve their purpose and have the fewest negative impacts. 1.1.5.54 The City will require develepers development to 0 mpaGt threshold has been met be consistent with the provisions of the Mobility Management System established in Goal B.1 of the Transportation Element. Section 27. That the Annual Update to the Capital Improvements Element of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element, page 1-10 through 1-14, be amended to read as follows: FY20105/14-6 ANNUAL UPDATE TO THE SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS CI C�IICAIT �T In the following, the concurrency -related public facilities (i.e., solid waste, potable water, stormwater, sanitary sewer, and parkland and reads) are evaluated to determine that the City's adopted level of service (LOS) standards are currently being met and will be adequate to serve approved and planned development over the next five years. The adopted Clearwater Capital Improvement Program, FY2010A! FY2015-16 — FY2019/20 indicates the timing, location and funding of capital projects needed to meet future public facilities' demands and demonstrate that the Comprehensive Plan is financially feasible. Current populations (2998 2015 estimate): 140,831 110,679 Projected 2018 populations (per Future Land use Element): 120,028 SOLID f UYAST: --------------- - ---------------- - ----- --------- ---------------------- ----------- Current Capacity: 7.12 lbs per capita per day Current demand: 5-48 4.89 lbs per capita per day Fiscal Year Demand Demand (Ibs per 1�rejj.ersted G^I'aity (Ibs per- Surplus 200940 649 742 4A 8^3 2949/44 3a 9 74-2 41J3 204442 a-49 742 4-93 294243 349 74-2 4-93 2443144 164-9 17.4.2 4 &3 Totals (201W14) 1 &4-9 17-42 14-.93 Fiscal Year Projected Projected Surplus Demand (Ibs per Capacity (Ibs Der Deficit ca ita r da capita -per da 2015/16 4.89 7.12 2.23 2016/17 4.89 7.12 2.23 15 Ordinance No. H05-16 2017/18 14.89 7.12 2.23 2018/19 4.89 7.12 2.23 2019/20 4.89 7.12 223 Totals 2019/20 4.89 7.12 2.23 Total solid waste generated by the City in 2008 (in tons): 104,898 Current pounds of solid waste per capita per day: 6-494.89 'The current capacity is based on the City's solid waste LOS standard. Capacity is actually greater since the City's Solid Waste Department is able to dispose of all waste produced within the City, as it coordinates with Pinellas County and other private facilities and vendors for waste disposal. The majority (80-85%) of all sSolid waste is disposed of at the Pinellas County Solid Waste to Energy Plant where most is incinerated and any remaining material is landfilled. According to the Pinellas County Technical Management Committee, the most recent projections take the life of the county landfill to year 2065. POTABLE,W-7 ft------------------- ---------------------------------------------------- ------ ----------------- Current capacity: 2-5 23.5 MGD Current demand: '�.' 1111.4 MGD Fiscal Year Projected Demand Maximum Projected Capacity Minimum Surplus Deficit 2015/16 11.4 20.75 9.36 2016/17 11.4 20.75 9.36 2017/18 11.5 20.75 9.35 2018/19 11.5 20.75 9.35 2019/20 11.6 20.75 19.34 Totals 2019/20 11.6 20.75 1 9.34 MGD = million gallons per day; Projections as per the City's Water Master Plan. Potable water LOS standard: 120 gallons per capita per day Current capacity: Total potable water available per day in gallons: 26,008;998 23.500.000 (2579 23.5 MGD) Current demand: 16 Ordinance No. 8805-] 6 Total potable water consumption per day in gallons: 42,000,008 11,400,000(4".11.4 MGD) Ga"()R6-69a${ med perrapita p 108.27 STORMWATER: Rssal Yea[ PFejerted Pfejested SUFplas Demand Caparity (De€+eit) 2QG914G10 YeaF LOS NhV 2849E44 404-eaF-LAS 1 ^-Yea i NW 24"42 404 -ear -LAS 40-Yeaj -6 NW 204293 48 aFeaFL-OS 10 YeaF L NW 2943/44 40 4eaFLAS 1 ^,—e� NFA' - 4A eaF-698 40 YeaF 6AS NW Stormwater LOS Standard: No adverse impacts to existing floodplain elevations_ and no increase in stormwater flow rate leaving a site. Notes: 1. The City of Clearwater Drainage Design Criteria was updated in September 2015 which specifies the design storms for new development in the City. Design Storm 10 -year storm frequency for all new developments for street drainage, storm systems, and culverts 25 -year storm frequency for all new developments for channels and detention areas with outfalls 50 -year storm frequency for all new developments for detention areas without outfalls 100 -year storm frequency for all new developments for detention areas without outfalls which overflow onto private property when capacity is exceeded Design standards for stormwater quality treatment/storage quantity shall conform to the current SWFWMD requirement [Presently being the SCS Unit Hydrograph design method, using the design storm frequency and a twenty-four (24) hour duration for sites ten (10) acres or more, and the rational design method for sites under ten (10) acres]. 17 Ordinance No. 8805-16 2. Development plans are reviewed for stormwater on a permit -by -permit basis. The City only approves a development if it meets the LOS standards per the City's design criteria. 3. Major watersheds within the City Limits with Watershed Master Plans are Alligator Creek, Allen's Creek, and Stevenson Creek. The City also includes Coastal Zones 1-4 , the Beach Zone and to a lesser extent. Curlew Creek, Possum Creek, Bishop Creek, and Mullet Creek. 4. In establishing Capital Improvement Projects for City projects, proiects are determined through the number of structures removed from the 100 -year floodplain and improvements in roadway level of service with consideration for regional needs and cost benefit. SANITARY f F =-------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------- Current capacity: 257 gallons per capita per day Current demand: 4-17 113 gallons per capita per day Fiscal Year Projected Projected. Surplus Demand Capacity (Deficit) Maximum Minimum 2899A 0 2015/16 44412.5 MGD 28.5 MGD 44-4 16.0 MGD 20Oil! 2016/17 44-212.5 MGD 28.5 MGD 44-3 16.0 MGD '^11A2 2017/18 44-2 12.5 MGD 28.5 MGD 444 16.0 MGD 284213 2018/19 444 12.5 MGD 28.5 MGD 44 2 16.0 MGD 2013A4 2019/20 44-312.6 MGD 28.5 MGD 44-2 15.9 MGD Totals (2043/44 14.3 MGD 28.5 MGD 44--2 15.9 2019/20) MGD MGD = million gallons per day; Projections as per the City's Water Pollution Control (WP(;) Master Plan. Sanitary sewer LOS standard: Current capacity (in gallons): Gallons available per capita per day Current demand: Gallons available per capita per day 127 gallons per capita per day 28,500,000 257.14 257.50 44,100,000 12, 500,000 127.2-2 112.94 P�� Aiz1RK.LARiD Current parkland acres: 1,711 -------------------------- ---- Current parkland acres per 1,000 persons: 15.46 Minimum parkland acres to meet adopted LOS: 442.72 Fiscal Year Pfejeeted Projected Surplus Demand Adopted Capacity (Deficit) Level of Service (Minimum) 18 Ordinance No. 8805-16 MOBS # Roadway Seciment Juris' Road Length Volume/ LOS Capacity T mi Ratio 504 # Roadway Seciment Juris' Road Length Volume/ LOS Capacity T mi Ratio 504 Belleair Rd (Keene Rd to US 19)2 CR 2U 1.969 1.042 F 565 Court St (Missouri Ave to Highland SR 4D 0.755 0.978 E Ave) 568 — Courtney Campbell Cswy Hillborou h CL to Ba shore Blvd SR — 4D — 5.235 1.143 F – 683 — Ft Harrison Ave (Belleair Rd to CL 2D — 1.551 1.195 F – Chestnut St)— 684 — Ft Harrison Ave (Chestnut St to CL 2D — 0.498 1.05 F – Drew St)— 857 — McMullen Booth Rd (Gulf to Bay CR 6D — 2.267 1.315 F – Blvd to Sunset Point Rd)— 858 — McMullen Booth Rd (Sunset Point CR 6D — 2.233 1.315 F – Road to SR 580)— 859 — McMullen Booth Rd (SR 580 to CR 6D 1.768 0.964 F – Curlew Rd 867 — Memorial Causeway (Clwtr Beach SR 4D 0.447 0.964 E Roundabout to Island Wa 1099 US 19 (SR 580 to Curlew Rd) SR 61) 2.035 1.475 ________ Notes: 1. CR – County road; CL – City of Clearwater; SR – State road. 2. Policy constrained roadway per the 2836 2040 Pinellas County Long Range Transportation Plan. 3. Related capacity improvement identified in the Pinellas County Transportation Improvement Program, FY 2010 2015/16 – FY 2015 2019/20. 4. Related capacity improvement identified in the Florida Department of Transportation Five - Year Work Program, FY 2011 2015-2020. Source: Facility Level of Service Analysis, Pinellas County MPO, 2988 2015 Arterial and collector roadways projected to operate below the adopted LOS standard in 2825 2035 are listed below. Note: The Pinellas MPO does not calculate interim year LOS projections (e.g., 2015), therefore, 2023 2035 data is used. . 4 Road Length YeaF 2026 Level OdFTS T--__ (n 202 tlf'VCFviCIP. �3US Alt 1 SR 2l4 2 091*Tl 2472 F y 20 Ordinance No. 8805-16 2999110 2015/16 4 per 1,000 13.31 15.46 per 9-34 11.46 per 1;000 1,000 2010/14 2016/17 4 per 1,000 4334 15.46 per 9-34 11.46 per 1,000 1,000 2011112 2017/18 4 per 1,000 4334 15.46 per 934 11.46 per 1,000 1,000 29421132018/19 4 per 1,000 4331 15.46 per 9�4 11.46 per 1,000 1,000 204M42019/20 4 per 1,000 13.31 15.46 per 97411.46 per 1,000 1,000 Totals 4 per 1,000 43.3-115.46 per 9:34 11.46 per 1,000 1,000 4§&g peF 1,000 peFsens. Note: Parkland is calculated using parklands that are within City boundaries that are owned and/or operated by the City. SuFFent demand440 430.7-4 e @ eFvi4-- peFsens Total (asreslpeF thousand peFsens): 1,476 1 711 Fe {0 10.01 10 89 p 1,000 peFsens - ROADS: Roadway LOS standard: C Average Daily, D Peak Hour Arterial and collector roadways currently operating below the adopted peak hour LOS standard include: 19 Ordinance No. 8805-16 21 Ordinance No. 8805-16 - - fig ! - - - oao= MEW== IF WA maw== MEW== MEW== 21 Ordinance No. 8805-16 # RoadwaySe ment Juris' Road Length AADT2 LOS T mi 573 - Belcher Rd (Guff to Bay Blvd to NE CR 4E - 0.805 33.361 F - Coachman Rd)- 574 - Belcher Rd (NE Coachman Rd to CR - 4D - 1.237 40000 . F - Sunset Point Rd 581 Belleair Rd (US 19 to Keene Rd)3 CR 2E 1.969 16,743 F 582 Belleair Rd (Keene Rd to Missouri Ave) CR 21-1 1.523 13,333 F 583 Belleair Rd (Missouri Ave to MLK Jr. CR 2U 0.252 11.000 E Ave 650 Countryside Blvd (Belcher Rd to US 191 CL 4D 0.538 32.500 E 657 Court St (Missouri Ave to Highland Ave) SR 4D 0.755 35,334 F 660 - Courtney Campbell Cswy (Hillsborough SR - 4D - 5.235 68.000 F - CL to Ba shore Blvd 727 Druid Rd (US 19 to Belcher Rd) CL 2D 1.09 12.500 E 728 Druid Rd (Belcher Rd to Keene Rd) CL 21-1 1.007 11,000 E 729 Druid Rd (Keene Rd to HighlandAve) CL 2U 0.774 12,163 F 785 - Ft Harrison Ave (Belleair Rd to Chestnut CL 2D 1.551 25.167 F - 786 Ft Harrison Ave (Chestnut St to Drew CL 2D 0.498 24,234 F St 827 G9 ff to Bay Blvd (Bayshore Blvd to US SR 6D 1.512 66,960 F 828 Gulf to Bay Blvd (US 19 to Belcher Rd) SR 6D 0.986 67,500 F 830 Gulf to Bay Blvd (Highland Ave to SR - 0.756 60.999 F Keene Rd 831 Gulf to Bay Blvd (Keene Rd to Belcher SR 6D 1.026 62.754 F Rd 832 - Gulfview Blvd (Clearwater Pass to CL 2D - 1.132 18,020 F - Roundabout)- 848 Highland Ave (Belleair Rd to Druid Rd) CR 2U 1.255 16.500 F 850 Highland Ave (Gulf to Bay Blvd to Drew - - 0.506 18,174 F St 851 Highland Ave (Drew St to Sunset Point CL 2D 1.512 18,668 F Edj 852 Highland Ave (Sunset Point Rd to Union CL 2U 0.504 18,000 F St 892 Keene Rd (Belleair Rd to Druid Rd) CR 4D 1.255 34.801 F 895 Keene Rd (Drew St to Sunset Point Rd) CR 4D 1.518 34.500 F 968 - McMullen Booth Rd (Gulf to Bay Blvd to CR 6D - 2.267 72,011 F - Sunset Point Rd)- 969 - McMullen Booth Rd (Sunset Point Rd to CR 6D - 2.233 74.000 F - SR 580)- 970 Booth Rd (SR 580 to Curlew CR 6D 1.768 66.000 F RMdcMullen 979 - Memorial Cswv (Clwtr Beach Roundabout to Island Way)- SR 4D - 0.447 41.500 F - 1008 NE Coachman Rd (Drew St to US 19) SR 2U 1.741 25.068 F 22 Ordinance No. 8805-16 1019 Nursery Rd (US 19 to Belcher Rd) CR 12E 0.961 111,500 E 1154 1 SR 580 (US 19 to Belcher Rd) SR 6D 0.556 55.000 F 1192 Sunset Point Rd (Keene Rd to Belcher Rd) CR 4D 1.098 34.003 F 1193 Sunset Point Rd (Belcher Rd to US 19) CR 4D 0.959 36.562 F 1230 US 19 (SR 580 to Curlew Rd) SR 6P 2.035 100.000___________ Notes: 1. CR —County road; CL —City of Clearwater; SR —State road. 2. AADT —Annual Average Daily Traffic. 3. Policy constrained roadway per the 2036 2040 Pinellas County Long Range Transportation Plan or Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. Source: Year2025 2015 AADT Traffic Forecast and PM Peak Level Sof Service, Pinellas County MPO, 200 . Section 28. That the Capital Improvement Program Revenue Summary of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element, page 1-15 through 1-17, be repealed and replaced to read as follows: .. •. ... -- --- ISO - --- ..... -- --- ... - --- - --- . ., .. ... -- --- ... - --- ..... i. - --- ... - --- - --- .. . .. .! ... -- --- ... - --- ..... _ ilrk -- --- ... - --- - --- . .. .. ... •. -- --- -- ... - --- ..... ..... - --- ... - --- - --- . .. 0 .. --- -- m e ! - --- ..... - --- ...Gas - --- - --- .__ . .. as --- ... - --- ...... j - --- --- - --- - --- . .. ... - --- . .. . -- --- i --- .. .. . -- --- -- --- ..... .... ... .... .... .... ... A A A A �5 AAA A i 5,099 1 Ordinance No. 8805-16 • • • ■ ■ e • • _■ a _e •, __■ e • ee _ � •, e e ■ � e eee e e e ee eee ■ ■ ■ e e ee eee _ e • gee e _. •e ee a •_ ee • _ee e e e .■ e e • e e ee e _ee e e e ee __ e _ •e .ee •ee ee eee eee .ee eee ee eee e_ eeeW,a ee• •T . 1 1_ e e e ■ e - e e Ordinance No. 8805-16 CAPITAL EMPROVEMENT PROGRAM REVENUE SUMMARY FY 2015-16 THROUGH FY 2020/21 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND CITY OF CLEARWATER 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 Total GENERAL SOURCES General Revenue 2,836,150 3,003,140 3,256,980 3,129,530 6,981,480 3,043,560 22,250,840 Road Millage 2,060,100 2,060,100 2,060,100 2,060,100 2,060,100 2,060,100 12,360,600 Penny for Pinellas 6,021,820 14,980,060 5,439,840 10,263,460 9,555,250 0 46,260,430 Transportation Impact Fees 190,000 190,000 140,000 140,000 140,000 140,000 940,000 Local Option Gas Tax 1,438,330 1,450,000 0 0 0 0 2,888,330 Special Program Fund 935,000 530,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 1,585,000 Grants - Other Agencies 1,485,000 560,000 80,000 960,000 3,040,000 0 6,125,000 Donations 100,000 50,000 0 0 0 0 150,000 To Be Determined 0 22,397,000 1,483,740 1 929 880 2,227,150 2 223 390 30,261,160 Subtotal General Sources 15,066,400 45,220,300 12,490,660 18,512,970 24,033,980 7,497,050 122,821,360 SELF-SUPPORTING FUNDS Marine Revenue 95,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 445,000 Clearwater Harbor Marina Fund 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 150,000 Aviation Revenue 25,000 155,000 35,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 260,000 Parking Revenue 2,409,000 410,500 406,000 407,500 409,000 409,000 4,451,000 Water Revenue 2,586,000 2,240,470 3,071,000 4,651,000 4,271,000 4,251,000 21,070,470 Sewer Revenue 8,412,830 7,879,280 5,200,960 4,853,500 6,161,480 7,040,510 39,548,560 Water Impact Fees 24,000 24,000 24,000 24,000 24,000 24,000 144,000 Sewer Impact Fees 82,130 12,460 12,460 12,460 12,460 12,460 144,430 Utility R&R 8,667,170 9,205.68 3,939,040 4,030,390 4,030,390 4,367,030 34,239,700 Stormwater Utility Revenue 5,498,550 5,825,100 5,831,860 6,348,450 6,729,430 6,294,000 36,527,390 Gas Revenue 6,050,000 4,050,000 13,850,000 4,050.000 4,050,000 4,050,000 36,100,000 _ Solid Waste Revenue 535,000 535,000 535,000 535,000 535,000 535,000 3,210,000 Recycling Revenue 90,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 590,000 Subtotal Self -Supporting Funds SERVICE 34,499,680 30,532,490 33,100,320 25,122,300 26,432,760 27,193,000 176,880,550 INTERNAL FUNDS Garage Fund Revenue 77,400 79,720 82,110 84,580 87,110 89,730 500,650 Administrative Service Revenue 1,710,000 1 350 000 1,150,000 1 150 000 1,706,860 1 475 000 8,541,860 Subtotal Internal Services Fund 1,787,400 1,429,720 1.232,110 1,234.580 1.793.970 1.564.730 9.042.510 36I:K*]5'Il.10 1 Ordinance No. 8805-16 Lease Purchase - General Fund 246,000 608,000 2,550,820 _ 643,220 976,950 1,832,800 ..;: 6.857,790 Subtotal Borrowing/General Sources 246,000 608,000 2,550,820 643,220 976,950 1,832,800 6,857,790 f SELF-SUPPORTING FUNDS Lease Purchase - Stormwater 320,000 0 0 0 0 0 320,000 : e" " Lease Purchase - Gas 161,000 0 0 0 0 0 161,000 Lease Purchase - Water 60,000 0 0 0 0 0 60,000 " Lease Purchase - Sewer 109,000 0 700,000 0 0 0 809,000 Future Bond Issue - Water & Sewer 11,867,870 11,378 110 20,987,540 4,433,650 5,365,670 0 54,032,840 Subtotal_ Borrowing/Self Supporting Funds 12,517,870 11,378,110 21,687,540 4,433,650 5,365,670 0 55,382,840 € '' INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS Lease Purchase - Garage 5,441,000 5,520,440 5,620,850 5,223,270 5,327,730 5,434,290 32,567,580 Lease Purchase - Administrative Services 405,000 405,000 405,000 410,000 410,000 500,000 2,535,000 ; Subtotal Borrowing/Internal Service Funds 5,846,000 5,925,440 6,025,850 5,633,270 5,737.730 5,934,290 35,102,580 406,087,630 TOTAL: ALL FUNDING SOURCES 69,963,350 95,094,060 77,087,300 55,579,990 64,341,060 44,021,870 Source: 2015 — 2016 Annual Operating Budget and Capital Improvement Budget `A Ordinance No. 8805-16 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BY FUNCTION FY 2015/16 THROUGH FY 2020121 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND CITY OF CLEARWATER Schedule of Planned Expenditures Function 2015116 2016117 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 Total Police Protection 200,000 3,305,000 0 0 0 0 3,505,000 Fire Protection 1,476,390 4,857,920 3,275,470 4,778,060 1,391,340 2,195,710 17,974,890 Major Street Maintenance 3,656,430 5,668,100 5,654,850 5,654,850 3,658,850 3,484,850 27,777,930 Sidewalk and Bike Trails 472,000 472,000 472,000 472,000 473,250 473,250 2,834,500 Intersections 335,000 335,000 331,990 315,410 315,400 315,390 1,948,190 Parking 2,389,000 19,482,500 381,000 382,500 384,000 384,000 23,403,000 Miscellaneous Engineering 935,000 535,000 35,000 35,000 2,460,000 35,000 4,035,000 Parks Development 6,735,000 5,037,000 3,564,840 3,325,000 7,125,000 1,440,000 .27,226,840 Marine Facilities 410,000 385,000 390,000 390,000 390,000 390,000 2,355,000 Airpark Facilities 65,000 715,000 115,000 1,215,000 3,815,000 15,000 5,940,000 Libraries 115,580 387,350 27,340 462,720 35,000 0 1,027,990 Garage 5,639,400 5,700,160 5,702,960 5,307,850 5,414,840 5,524,020 33,289,230 Maintenance of Buildings 902,000 881,850 794,070 2,161,630 1,084,590 1,045,650 6,869,790 General Public City Buildin110,000 522,800 4,646,630 985,650 10,289,100 0 16,554,180 Miscellaneous 2,125,000 5,995,000 1,625,000 1,630,000 1,955,000 2,045,000 15,375,000 Stormwater Utility 5,802,550 5,714,380 4,751,150 6,174,320 4,999,690 6,294,000 33,736,090 Gas System 6,211,000 4,050,000 13,850,000 4,050,000 4,050,000 4,050,000 36,261,000 Solid Waste & Recycling 625.000 635,000 635,000 635,000 635,000 635,000 3,800,000 pv Utilities Miscellaneous 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 120,000 Sewer System 24,469,000 23,260,000 16,260,000 11,400,000 10,200,000 10,150,000 95,739,000 Water System tem 7 270,000 7,135,000 14,555,000 6,185,000 5,645,000 5,525,000 46,315,000 69,963,350 95 094,060 77,087,300 55,579,990 64,341,060 44,021,870 406,087,630 Source: City of Clearwater Ordinance 8768-15, Exhibit B 9 Section 30. Should any part or provision of this Ordinance be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the Ordinance as a whole, or any part thereof other than the part declared to be invalid. Section 31. This ordinance shall become effective when the Department of Economic Opportunity issues a final order determining the adopted amendment to be in compliance, or the Administration Commission issues a final order determining the adopted amendments to be in compliance, in accordance with Section 163.3184, F.S., as amended. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Approved as to form: Camilo Soto Assistant City Attorney George N. Cretekos Mayor Attest: Rosemarie Call City Clerk