Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
LUP2017-10010
120 TUSKTWILLA ST `.. �CLEARWATER LUP2017-10010 �BFUGHT�BUUn�.BMTOeFACH Comprehensive F ,VFW post 10304 Indl�oning: Office Atlas #: 305B J ALL APPLICATIONS ARE TO BE FILLED OUT COMPLETELY AND CORRECTLY, AND SUBMITTED IN PERSON (NO FAX OR DELIVERIES) TO THE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY NOON ON THE SCHEDULED DEADLINE DATE. ONE (1) COMPLETE SET OF APPLICATION MATERIALS AS REQUIRED WITHIN IS TO BE SUBMITTED DIGITALLY (COMBINED INTO A SINGLE PDF FILE ONTO A CD/DVD/USB DRIVE) FOR REVIEW BY THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE. SUBSEQUENT SUBMITTAL FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD WILL REQUIRE 11 COMPLETE SETS OF APPLICATION MATERIALS PRINTED (1 ORIGINAL AND 10 COPIES) AND ONE (1) COMBINED DIGITAL COPY IN A MANNER CONSISTENT WITH THE ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL. PLANS AND APPLICATIONS ARE REQUIRED TO BE COLLATED, STAPLED AND FOLDED INTO SETS. IT IS INCUMBENT UPON THE APPLICANT TO SUBMIT COMPLETE AND CORRECT INFORMATION. ANY MISLEADING, DECEPTIVE, INCOMPLETE OR INCORRECT INFORMATION MAY INVALIDATE YOUR APPLICATION. THE APPLICANT, BY FILING THIS APPLICATION, AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE. APPLICATION FEE: $885 Future Land Use Map Amendment only, includes Zoning Atlas Amendment $0 Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment APPLICATION TO AMEND: K0 FUTURE LAND USE MAP (select one) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (TEXT) PROPERTY OWNER (PER DEED): Edward and James White VFW Post10304 MAILING ADDRESS: 724 Tuskawilla St PHONE NUMBER: 727-953-9295 EMAIL: rankenbauer@tampabay.rr.com AGENT OR REPRESENTATIVE: Robert Ankenbauer MAILING ADDRESS: 132 19th St. SE Largo FI. 33771 PHONE NUMBER: 727-686-5524 EMAIL: rankenbauer@tampabay.rr.com ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY (if applicable): 720 Tuskawilla St PARCEL NUMBER(S): 21-29-15-58068-016-0130 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Milton Park Blk 16 Lot 13 DESCRIPTION OF TEXT NA AMENDMENT (if applicable): Specifically identify the requested amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 1 of 7 Revised 10/05/2016 Planning & Development Department BRIGHT AND BEAITfIFIIL� BAY TO BEACH �CLEARWATER Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application _ Including Future Land Use Map Amendments PLEASE ENSURE THAT THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS FILLED OUT, IN ITS ENTIRETY. FAILURE TO COMPLETE THIS FORM WILL RESULT IN YOUR APPLICATION BEING FOUND INCOMPLETE AND POSSIBLY DEFERRED UNTIL THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION CYCLE. FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATION PRESENT: Residential/Office General (R/OG) REQUESTED: Institutional (1) COUNTYWIDE PLAN MAP CATEGORY PRESENT: Office REQUESTED: Public/Semi-Public ZONING DISTRICT PRESENT: Office REQUESTED: Institutional SITE AREA: 6325 sq. ft. 0.145 acres MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE DENSITY/INTENSITY(S) : USE(S): Current/Existing Existing (currently on site FAR 0.50 Vacant Future Land Use(s): or previous use if vacant): Proposed Future Proposed (new use, if any; FAR 0.65 plus existing if to remain): Social +Community Center Land Use(s): (units, rooms or beds per acre or non- residential square footage) FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATIONS FOR ALL ADJACENT PROPERTY: North: R/OG South: I East: I, R/OG West: R/OG STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this applicationp� Sworn to and subscribed before me this L day of "�,� n to me and/or by W a'Q who is personally known has produced L as identification. Signature of property owner or representative ) , Notary public, My commission expires: 8onftd Thru NOWY PUt>Sio UmW*"I us Planning .& Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4561; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 2 of 7 Revised 10/05/2016 Planning & Development Department �CLEARWATER Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application Submittal Package Checklist IN ADDITION TO THE COMPLETED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION, ALL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATIONS SHALL INCLUDE A SUBMITTAL PACKAGE THAT INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING: ❑ if the application is for an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map (CUP), in addition to the application, the applicant must also provide the following: ❑ Proof of ownership (e.g., copy of deed, title insurance policy, or other instrument demonstrating ownership) ❑ Legal description of the property. If the property is not a platted lot of record, a current boundary survey prepared, signed and sealed by a land surveyor currently registered in the State of Florida is required. ❑ Information demonstrating that the proposed amendment complies with the criteria set forth in Section 4-603.F. The attached Comprehensive Plan Amendment Standards for Review sheet shall be used to provide these responses. ❑ An assessment of the impact of the proposed change on the adequacy of public facilities, the environment, community character, and the fiscal condition of the city. ❑ if the application is for an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan text (CPA), and does not affect an individual parcel of land, in addition to the application, the applicant must also provide the following: ❑ Data and analysis to support such an amendment under Florida Statutes. ❑ Information demonstrating that the proposed amendment complies with the criteria set forth in Section 4-603.F. The attached Comprehensive Plan Amendment Standards for Review sheet shall be used to provide these responses. ❑ A Traffic Impact Study is not required as part of the application for an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map (LUP). A Traffic Impact Study may be provided at the applicant's discretion to supplement the assessment of the impact of the proposed change on the adequacy of public facilities (existing roadways). A Traffic Impact Study may be required at the time a site plan is submitted for .development review if the total generated net new trips generated by the proposed development meet one or more conditions outlined on the appropriate application. ❑ PUBLIC HEARING ATTENDANCE: The applicant or applicant's agent is advised to attend all public hearings scheduled for the proposed amendment including public hearings before the Community Development Board and City Council. Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 3 of 5 Revised 10/05/2016 �CLEARWATER Planning & Development Department BRI �1 GHT AND BEAU77FUL• RAY TO BEACH Comprehensive Plan Amendment Standards for Review PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO EACH OF THE SIX (6) STANDARDS FOR REVIEW EXPLAINING HOW, IN DETAIL, THE CRITERION IS BEING COMPLIED WITH PER THIS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT. 1. The amendment will further implementation of the comprehensive plan consistent with the goals, policies and objectives contained in the plan. The proposed amendment will further implementation of the comprehensive plan consistent with the goals, objectives and policies contained Within the plan. The proposed amendment is specifically with Goal AA and Objective A.6.2 of the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The amendment is not inconsistent with other provisions of the comprehensive plan. The proposed amendment is not inconsistent with other provisions of the comprehensive plan. 3. The available uses, if applicable, to which the property may be put are appropriate to the property in question and compatible with existing and planned uses in the area. The VFW has been located on the parcel since 1976 and purchased the subject parcel in 1985. The VFW has determined it needs to use the Subject parcel for additional development, which would be an accessory use to the main building. The VFW wishes to remain in the area and Is compatible with other properties in the area. 4. Sufficient public facilities are available to serve the property. Sufficient public facilities are available to serve the subject property. 5. The amendment will not adversely affect the natural environment. There are no wetlands or preservation on the subject property; therefore the proposed amendment would not adversely affect the natural Environment. 6. The amendment will not adversely impact the use of property in the immediate area. The VFW has been located at its currently location since 1976, and the proposed amendment will not adversely impact the use of property in The immediate area. Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tei: 727-582-49071 Falx: 727-562-4866 Page 4 of 5 Revised 10/05/2016 Planning & Development Department �CLEARVVATCR Comprehensive Plan Amendment BRIGHT AND BEAUTIFUL•BAY TO IIEAffidavit to Authorize Aeent/Reuresentative 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed — PRINT full names: Edward and James White VFW Post 10304 2. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property: Edward and James White VFW Post 10304 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for (describe request): Zoning change 4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: Robert Ankenbauer as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. That (1/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. Robert Ankenbauer ,Q,,�J, Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS BEFORE ME THE UNDERSIGNED, AN OFFICER DULY COMMISSIONED BY THE LAWS \OF^ -THE STATE OF FLORIDA, ON THIS DAY OF � Uzb �_` !�-'� ` PERSONALLY APPEARED V "It kk" b"(_ WHO HAVING BEEN FIRST DULY SWORN DEPOSED AND SAYS THAT HE/SHE FULLY UNDERSTANDS THE CONTENTS OF THE AFFIDAVIT THAT HE/SHE SIGNED. LAUREN M. WEISER MYCOMMISSI0N#FF91B%1 Notary Public Signature _ = EXPIRES: *gPmbkund � My Commission Bonded Thro Notary 1 � �, / • � � � Notary Seal/St, Expires: Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, TLW 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-882-+4865 Page 6 of 7 Revised 10/05/2016 �' S;LE W F E R 71 BRIGHT AND BFATYrJFUL- BAY M RFACIA PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: December 19, 2017 AGENDA ITEM: H.1. CASE: LUP2017-10010 REQUEST: To amend the Future Land Use Map designation from Residential/Office General (R/OG) to Institutional (I) GENERAL DATA: Applicant ......................... Robert Ankenbauer Owner ............................. Edward and James White VFW Post 10304 Location .......................... 720 Tuskawilla Street, located on the north side of Tuskawilla Street approximately 90 feet west of South Myrtle Avenue Property Size ................... 0.145 -acre portion of a 0.288 -acre parcel Background: This case involves 0.145 acres of a 0.288 -acre parcel located on the north side of Tuskawilla Street approximately 90 feet west of South Myrtle Avenue. The parcel, owned by Edward and James White Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFW) Post 10304 is comprised of two lots (Lots 13 and 14). The VFW has been located at the intersection of Tuskawilla Street and South Myrtle Avenue since 1976, and purchased the subject property (Lot 13) in 2003. The VFW utilizes a 644 square foot building located on Lot 14, and recently demolished a building that occupied Lot 13. As a result of the previous property acquisition, the parcel currently has two future land use designations: Institutional (I) on Lot 14 recognizing the VFW's social club use, and Residential/Office General (R/OG) on Lot 13, the proposed amendment area. Maps 1 and 2 show the general location of the property and an aerial view of the amendment area. The request is to change the Future Land Use Map designation of the proposed amendment area (Lot 13) from Residential/Office General (R/OG) to Institutional (I), thereby establishing a uniform future land use designation across the parcel. A request to rezone the proposed amendment area from the Office (0) District to the Institutional (I) District is being processed concurrently with this case (see REZ2017-10011). The VFW has indicated it would like to expand, adding an accessory structure on the site; however, no site plan has been submitted at this time. Level III Comprehensive Plan Amendment Review Map 1 Vicinity Characteristics: PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT LONG RANGE PLANNING DIVISION Map 2 Map 3 shows the existing surrounding uses. The site is largely surrounded by offices, which are located to the west, north and east of the site, across South Myrtle Avenue. In addition, there are two single family homes and a vehicle service use to the west. To the south and southeast is the Clearwater Municipal Cemetery. Map 3 Community! Development Board December 1Q, 2017 LUP2017-10010 - Page 2 of 8 i JASMINE WLJ \J - MAGNOLIA DR '--'UW t� - y0P MAGNOI.Iq pF LOTUS PATH - 'PAIR - q JEFFORDS :... Q PROJECT.sFOFDs I " . F sr w i W GRAND CENTRALSr SITE m o a pPlNELt A.S. z �y 2 Md ELLAS — W 6 '¢ J F WNLAST SOUTH ST °EST a !� �� McLENNAAI STS J GUEENST HLW�'�� 6EtLEWE WAY � BL VD LOCATION MAP Map 1 Vicinity Characteristics: PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT LONG RANGE PLANNING DIVISION Map 2 Map 3 shows the existing surrounding uses. The site is largely surrounded by offices, which are located to the west, north and east of the site, across South Myrtle Avenue. In addition, there are two single family homes and a vehicle service use to the west. To the south and southeast is the Clearwater Municipal Cemetery. Map 3 Community! Development Board December 1Q, 2017 LUP2017-10010 - Page 2 of 8 Level III Comprehensive Plan Amendment Review PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT LONG RANGE PLANNING DIVISION As shown on Map 4, the abutting future land use designations are Residential/Office General (R/OG) and Institutional (I). The surrounding vicinity has areas designated Industrial Limited (IL) to the west and northwest, and Residential Urban (RU) farther east, across South Myrtle Avenue. A comparison between the uses, densities and intensities allowed by the present and proposed Future Land Use Map designations appears in Table 1, along with the consistent zoning districts. 1 1 2 I i �' /j� I w I R10G" I I 'it30 6 4 1 2$22p5] 9 1 8 1 7 IB 5 �K 7 18_ 5 1 11238 4 1 32_1 7 yl 1 I o 8– Residential Equivalent; Office Clubs; Public Offices; Residential O7 i 3 2_11 W 1235'/+11 ' © 15 Dwelling Units Per Acre 12.5 Dwelling Units Per Acre 79331 12351 1 1 FAR 0.50; ISR 0.75 FAR 0.65; ISR 0.85 –5 –` 7132 iiflire7 rte.r:.. `� _ _ T f -i_ –7 J3113 Office (0) 114 8 I 9 iD it L 12 1 13 1d 1111,1 i� ., 14 15 1614 12°431 8 I 9 f0 1�7213 10 1 pIt11 12 14 r13 2 15 l8 e y 72.91 1 e n ni p 1 o ,.. �` 1 /] Qdg 1251 ' r 11 PINELL AS S7 _ CINELUS S`T $ 1 2 1 7 l\�iroJJl 6 5 7 1 2 I 1 III T 3 2 1 7 7 1 6 5 _ �.Jf 3 2 1 B 8 7 8 5" 1 3 �4 77 V a 9 10 tt 12 P3 74 7}�6 i2 3 Id 5 ,t l7 �'q 4 ,_. _ 04 17 I – V 8 I 8 10 ' t1 12 73 14 I 1 'd $ 617 11 19 14 15 16 i .` bl o 7usxawUJA ST 14 fus 7 i $ I4 2 7Y13JO"XI.A 3r 2 1 1 1 8 7 1 6 5 1 4 1 3 ' 2 2 1 1 1 1 8 7 1 6 5 1 4 1 3' 2 1 1 –1 _ _ 2 1 '1 � "r 2 4 10 I 1/ I 17 9 1 11� 1734 I0/3 4 B Il. 10 I it 1 /1 11_ J 1 IL 1_ rJ i :,21134 L — 3.8 Acid 1 1 1 1 x b 9 y 3.8 Apq FUTURE LAND USE MAP ZONING MAP Map 4 Map ' -5 Table 1. Uses, Densities and Intensities Allowed by Present and Proposed Future Land Use Designations Community Development Board — December 19, 2017 LUP2017-10010 - Page 3 of 8 . Residential/Office Medium Density Residential; Public/Private Schools; Social Primary Uses: Residential Equivalent; Office Clubs; Public Offices; Residential Equivalent Maximum Density: 15 Dwelling Units Per Acre 12.5 Dwelling Units Per Acre Maximum FAR 0.50; ISR 0.75 FAR 0.65; ISR 0.85 Intensity: Consistent Zoning Medium Density Residential (MDR); Institutional (1) Districts: Office (0) Community Development Board — December 19, 2017 LUP2017-10010 - Page 3 of 8 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT Level III Comprehensive Plan Amendment Review LONG RANGE PLANNING DIVISION REVIEW CRITERIA: Consistency with the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan [Sections 4-603.F.1 and 4-603.F.21 Recommended Findings of Fact: Applicable goals and objectives of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan which support the proposed amendment include: Goal A.2 A sufficient variety and amount of future land use categories shall be provided to accommodate public demand and promote infill development. Goal A.4. The City shall work toward a land use pattern that can be supported by the available community and public facilities that would be required to serve the development. Objective A.4.1 The City's Concurrency Management System will ensure that compatibility of all proposed development with the capacities of the existing and planned support facilities for which a level of service has been adopted. Objective A.6.4 Due to the built -out character of the city of Clearwater, compact urban development within the urban service area shall be promoted through application of the Clearwater Community Development Code. The VFW is already located on the parcel, but the future land use amendment is required to allow it to utilize the additional portion of the property for future expansion and/or accessory uses. The proposed Institutional (I) future land use designation is compatible with the surrounding office uses and cemetery. It is also compatible with the small number of single . family houses in the neighborhood. In addition, the proposal does not degrade the level of service for public facilities below the adopted standards (a detailed public facilities analysis follows in this report). Recommended Conclusions of Law: The request does not conflict with the goals, objectives and policies of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan and furthers said plan as indicated in the goals and objectives listed above. Consistency with the Countywide Rules Recommended Findings of Fact: The underlying Countywide Plan Map category on the proposed amendment area is Office (0). The proposed amendment area is on the edge of two districts, with Office (0) also on the surrounding properties to the north and west, and Public/Semi-Public (P/SP) to the east and south. The proposed City of Clearwater future land use designation of Institutional (I) will necessitate an amendment from the Office (0) category to the Public/Semi-Public (P/SP) category in order to maintain consistency between the City's Future Land Use Map and the Countywide Plan Map. Section 2.3.3.10 of the Countywide Rules states that the Public/Semi-Public (P/SP) category is intended to recognize institutional and transportation/utility uses that serve the community or region, especially larger facilities having acreage exceeding the thresholds established in other plan categories, and which are Cbthibunity Development Board — December 19, 2017 LUP2017-10010 - Page 4 of 8 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT Level RI Comprehensive Plan Amendment Review LONG RANGE PLANNING DIVISION consistent with the need, character, and scale of such uses relative to the surrounding uses, transportation facilities, and natural resource features. The proposed use, as indicated by the applicant, is a social club use, which is an appropriate use within the area and is consistent with the proposed and surrounding Countywide Plan Map categories. Recommended Conclusions of Law: The proposed Future Land Use Map amendment is consistent with the purpose of the proposed category in the Countywide Rules. Compatibility with Surrounding Properties/Character of the City & Neighborhood [Section 4-603.F.3 and Section 4-603.F.61 Recommended Findings of Fact: Existing surrounding uses consist of offices (north and east), cemetery (south and southeast), single family residential (west and east) and vehicle services (west). The continued use of the subject property as an expanded social club is compatible with the surrounding properties and neighborhood. The proposed Institutional (1) future land use category primarily permits institutional development at a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of 0.65. Residential equivalent uses are permitted at a density of 3 beds per dwelling unit at 12.5 dwelling units per acre. The future land use designations of surrounding properties include Residential/Office General (R/OG), Institutional (I) and Industrial Limited (IL). The proposed Institutional (I) future land use category, which primarily allows for institutional uses such as churches, social clubs, schools, or residential equivalent uses, is consistent with the surrounding future land use designations that exist in the vicinity of the subject property. The proposed amendment will allow the existing VFW to potentially expand in the future, and the use will remain consistent and in character with the surrounding properties and neighborhood. Recommended Conclusions of Law: The proposed Institutional (1) future land use category is in character with the Future Land Use Map designations in the area. Further, the proposal is compatible with surrounding uses and consistent with the character of the surrounding properties and neighborhood. Sufficiency of Public Facilities [Section 4-603.F.41 Recommended Findings of Fact: To assess the sufficiency of public facilities needed to support potential development on the proposed amendment area, the maximum development potential of the property under the present and requested City Future Land Use Map designations were analyzed. Community Development Board — December 19, 2017 LUP2017-10010 - Page 5 of 8 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT Level III Comprehensive Plan Amendment Review LONG RANGE PLANNING DIVISION Table 2. Development Potential for Existing & Proposed FL UM Designations :A • I VA 1 Net Change • , 0.145 AC 0.145 AC Site Area (6,316 SF) (6,316 SF) Maximum 2 DUs 0 DUs -2 DUs Development 3,158 SF 4,105 SF 947 SF Potential 0.50 FAR 0.65 FAR 0.15 FAR Notes: 1. Residential uses not permitted through consistent Institutional (I) District Abbreviations: FLUM — Future Land Use Map DUs — Dwelling Units AC — Acres FAR — Floor Area Ratio SF — Square feet As shown in the table, there is an increase in nonresidential development potential across the amendment area which would increase demand on most public facilities, but would not degrade them below acceptable levels as detailed below. The following analysis compares the maximum potential development of the proposed Institutional (1) future land use developed with a social club use (4,105 square feet) to the maximum development potential of the existing Residential/Office General (R/OG) future land use category developed with an office use (3,158 square feet). An increase in demand of the public facilities could be expected if the VFW expands; however, there is adequate capacity to serve the property. Potable Water The increase in development potential from this amendment would result in an increase in potable water use of 95.5 gallons per day. This is determined by comparing the potential potable water utilization of the maximum square footage allowed by the proposed land use developed with a social club use (410 gallons per day) to the potential utilization of an office built out to the maximum square footage allowed by the current land use designation (315 gallons per day). Wastewater The increase in development potential from this amendment would also result in an increase in wastewater production of 76 gallons per day. This is determined by comparing the potential wastewater generation of the proposed land use developed with a social club use (328 gallons) to the potential wastewater generation of the current land use designation developed with an office use (252 gallons). Solid Waste The proposed amendment could result in an increase of 15.7 tons per year of solid waste generated when comparing the amount of waste generated by a social club use to that of an office use. All solid waste disposal is handled by Pinellas County at the Pinellas County Waste -to -Energy Plant and the Bridgeway Acres Sanitary Landfill which has significant capacity. Additionally, the City provides a full-service citywide recycling program which diverts waste from the landfill, helping to extend the lifespan of Bridgeway Acres. There is excess solid waste capacity to serve the amendment area. Community Development Board — December 19, 2017 LUP2017-10010 - Page 6 of 8 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT Level III Comprehensive Plan Amendment Review LONG RANGE PLANNING DIVISION Parkland The City's adopted LOS for parkland acreage, which is 4 acres per 1,000 population, will not be impacted by this proposed amendment. Under both the existing and proposed land use, the LOS citywide will remain at 15.46 acres per 1,000 population. Stormwater Site plan approval will be required before the property can be redeveloped. At that time, the stormwater management system for the site will be required to meet all City and SWFWMD stormwater management criteria. Streets The subject property is located on the north side of Tuskawilla Street approximately 90 feet west of South Myrtle Avenue. To evaluate potential impacts to streets, the typical traffic impacts figure (trips per day per acre) in the Countywide Rules for the corresponding Countywide Plan Map categories (current and proposed) are compared. The current number of trips per day (12 trips) is calculated based on the typical traffic generation numbers for the Office (0) category (89 trips per day per acre). The proposed Countywide Plan Map category of Public/Semi-Public (P/SP) (67 trips per day per acre) would decrease the amount of trips per day to 9 trips per day. This is a decrease of 3 trips per day compared to the number of trips under the current designation. Recommended Conclusions of Law: Based upon the findings of fact, it is determined that the proposed change will not result in the degradation of the existing levels of service for potable water, sanitary sewer, solid waste, parkland, stormwater management and streets. Impact on Natural Resources [Section 4-603.F.51 Recommended Findings of Fact: No wetlands appear to be located on the subject property. The City's codes require that development is compliant with the City's tree preservation, landscaping and stormwater management requirements. Recommended Conclusions of Law: Based upon the findings of fact, it is determined that the proposed Future Land Use Map amendment will not negatively impact natural resources on the subject property. Community Development Board — December 19, 2017 LUP2017- 100 10 - Page 7 of 8 Level III comprehensive Plan Amendment Review SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT LONG RANGE PLANNING DIVISION No amendment to the Comprehensive Plan or Future Land Use Map shall be recommended for approval or receive a final action of approval unless it complies with the standards contained in Section 4-603.F, Community Development Code. Table 3 below depicts the consistency of the proposed amendment with the standards pursuant to Section 4-603.F: Table 3. Consistency with Community Development Code Standards for Review F.1 The amendment will further implementation of the X Comprehensive Plan consistent with the goals, policies and objectives contained in the Plan. F.2 The amendment is not inconsistent with other provisions X of the Comprehensive Plan. F.3 The available uses, if applicable, to which the properties X may be put are appropriate to the properties in question and compatible with existing and planned uses in the area. FA Sufficient public facilities are available to serve the X properties. F.5 The amendment will not adversely affect the natural X environment. F.6 The amendment will not adversely impact the use of X properties in the immediate area. Based on the foregoing, the Planning and Development Department recommends the following action: Recommend APPROVAL of the Future Land Use Map Amendment from Residential/Office General (R/OG) to Institutional (I). Prepared by Planning and Development Department Staff: Kyle Brotherton Senior Planner ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance No. 9097-18 Resume Photographs of Site and Vicinity Community Development Board — December 19, 2017 LUP2017- 100 10 - Page 8 of 8 BIUGHT A M BFJ\U77rUL• BAY TO RFACH PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: December 19, 2017 AGENDA ITEM: H.2. CASE: REZ2017-10011 REQUEST: To amend the Zoning Atlas designation from Office (0) District to Institutional (I) District GENERAL DATA: Applicant ......................... Robert Ankenbauer Owner ............................. Edward and James White VFW Posts 10304 Location .......................... 720 Tuskawilla Street, located on the north side of Tuskawilla Street approximately 90 feet west of South Myrtle Avenue Property Size ................... 0.145 -acre portion of a 0.288 -acre parcel Background: This case involves 0.145 acres of a 0.288 -acre parcel located on the north side of Tuskawilla Street approximately 90 feet west of South Myrtle Avenue. The parcel, owned by Edward and James White Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFW) Post 10304 is comprised of two lots (Lots 13 and 14). The VFW has been located at the intersection of Tuskawilla Street and South Myrtle Avenue since 1976, and purchased the subject property (Lot 13) in 2003. The VFW utilizes a 644 square foot building located on Lot 14, and recently demolished a building that occupied Lot 13. As a result of the previous property acquisition, the parcel currently has two future land use designations: Institutional (I) on Lot 14 recognizing the VFW's social club use, and Residential/Office General (R/OG) on Lot 13, the proposed amendment area. Maps 1 and 2 show the general location of the property and an aerial view of the amendment area. The request is to change the Zoning Atlas designation of the proposed amendment area (Lot 13) from Office (0) to Institutional (I), thereby making the entire parcel a consistent zoning designation. A request to amend the future land use category of the proposed amendment area from the Residential/Office General (R/OG) category to the Institutional (1) category is being processed concurrently with this case (see LUP2017- 10010). The VFW has indicated it would like to expand, adding an accessory structure on the site; however, no site plan has been submitted at this time. Level III Zoning Atlas Amendment Review DRUID Rp L./ �. JASNINE ip ,..� GNOLIA DR w 2 t MAGNOLIA DR j.� LOTUS PATH + �- ')� LOTUS PATH Z I h JEFFORDS JEFFORDS Sr w '< PROJECT A 2 W GRAND CENTRAL ST ¢ - SITE z 2 P/NELLA$ s _ s ¢ T NNL.A S7 O 4 A ST, LAKEYIEw RD c W CST �11 I a Q SOUTH ST q x 3 EST i KfNGSLEYST NCLENNAN ST �! _ 2 ; QUFEN $T SELLEVIEWHLVD y _.F O I BELCEi Y}U-E.HLVID WKDWOOD WAY LOCATION MAP Map 1 Vicinity Characteristics: PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT LONG RANGE PLANNING DIVISION Map 2 Map 3 shows the existing surrounding uses. The site is largely surrounded by offices, which are located to the west, north and east of the site, across South Myrtle Avenue. In addition, there are two single family homes and a vehicle service use to the west. To the south and southeast is the Clearwater Municipal Cemetery. .1 13 10 11 12 i3 14 TUSR4W7LLA ST 8 I 2 / i 1 8 7 1 8 5 1 4 1 3 2 1 1 1 I 2 I ^I b r:7f I 1 2fl+ offic_es6 s 3I HT1 r siLW itb'1I aEe$I 3 4 15.67819 14 15 f 16 1 1 1 Qrt 21 I 1 ti S TUSKAWR,LA ST Cemetery 3.8 Auc, � n ss v I EXISTING SURROUNDING USES MAP Map 3 Cnmmnnity i evelopment Board Docember 19, 2017 REZ2017-09008- Page 2 of 8 I 1 7; 6 nom, I 11!70 1 5' 4 1 3 1 2 i i 14 8 1 = +� 11. 12; 73 � 14 1 ' o ice, " , TMIB.LAS ST Ic 1 I f8 � fflae3 .1 13 10 11 12 i3 14 TUSR4W7LLA ST 8 I 2 / i 1 8 7 1 8 5 1 4 1 3 2 1 1 1 I 2 I ^I b r:7f I 1 2fl+ offic_es6 s 3I HT1 r siLW itb'1I aEe$I 3 4 15.67819 14 15 f 16 1 1 1 Qrt 21 I 1 ti S TUSKAWR,LA ST Cemetery 3.8 Auc, � n ss v I EXISTING SURROUNDING USES MAP Map 3 Cnmmnnity i evelopment Board Docember 19, 2017 REZ2017-09008- Page 2 of 8 Level III Zoning Atlas Amendment Review PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT LONG RANGE PLANNING DIVISION As shown on Map 4, the abutting zoning atlas designations are Office (0) and Institutional (I). The surrounding vicinity has areas designated Industrial, Research and Technology (IRT) to the west and northwest, and Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) farther east, across South Myrtle Avenue. 1 t 2 11 ¢' Iw0G' • I I " 1 1�B 11129' ' ' 1 1 I 11711 1 f) + ' 1 ' 2 1, ' �n ' 1 T 6 5 , i ' I ' bf30 4 I 1 12311' I ,231 9 1 8 1 7 16 1 5 1 7 1 8 5 a I J 2 1' f 7y' e T I b 5 7351 1 ~I _'_' O _ -__ _ _ 1 J 1 2 1 1 W ` W 12295' I 1 1 _ -1-- 1131' , IM, .... 1__T__ a _ __ _r_ t23r_ _ IN 6-V 1 13 1 16 Q 8 , 10 1_y 12 1 13 1 Id i 1 2 11 t2 ^3 to 1• r. 17131 I 1 1 13 1 is a 8 I 9 10 K 1 tt L t2� 13 ; is —Il 1J t< a8 1 1 , la al 8061 1 M 9 ai 12224471 I 11si1 1 1 1 .l �I I N O 1227' 1 15611 1 R �1 P111IELA5 ST � PMELLAS ST S S a1 I b i �tl UE :IIT 11 `° �� �^ I 0 "s $ 12 1 22 7 6 5 3 2 1 9 6 7p 6m 5 3'__I_ 2 7 1 1 8 5 _ d 3 2 1 126 9 8 7 6 Sm 4 3e 1 13—�_ ��d 17 — _,i V 8 1 9 ,0 tt 12 13 16 1 I 1 13 17 1Q6 _I_ _ _ '122 V 10 B i 9 10 11 12 tJ 14 - IT i 19 16 15 I 226 1Id '^'n, 1 619 10 15 I 1b 1 1111 , 9 NEI' ' '-�i2 `` ,' 1 1 - - 1 1 h 7USKA1174LA ST $ .w I 1 224 S g t A 2 11 I 1 , I I 1 F TUSKAM9LLA ST 1 1�2%JJ 1 1 i , 1 1 i 1 1 1 i T I 1 1 q 1 A' , I ' 1 j I I 2 / 1 18 1 7 1 6 ' 5 1 d J 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 18 7 1 8 5 1 1 6 1 3 — 1 1 I i 9 'I m' 11 1 t2 O , B d ' 9 ' 10 1 11 I 12 Ir 3) 1 I L_91J113d rJ I O 11_9, _J 1B/t}� 1 1 1 ' n b 3.8 Acw1 � IO I 1 3.8 Ac c) FUTURE LAND USE MAP ZONING MAP Map 4 REVIEW CRITERIA: Map Consistency with the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan and Community Development Code and Regulations [Sections 4-602.F.11 Recommended Findings of Fact: Applicable goals and objectives of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan which support the proposed amendment include: Goal A.2 A sufficient variety and amount of future land use categories shall be provided to accommodate public demand and promote infill development. Goal A.4. The City shall work toward a land use pattern that can be supported by the available community and public facilities that would be required to serve the development. Objective A.4.1 The City's Concurrency Management System will ensure that compatibility of all proposed development with the capacities of the existing and planned support facilities for which a level of service has been adopted. Cnmmnnity Des7elogment Board December 19, 2017 REZ2017-09008- Page 3 of 8 PLANNING &. DEVELOPMENT Level III Zoning Atlas Amendment Review LONG RANGE PLANNING DIVISION Objective A.6.4 Due to the built -out character of the city of Clearwater, compact urban development within the urban service area shall be promoted through application of the Clearwater Community Development Code. Applicable section of the Community Development Code which supports the proposed amendment: Division 12. Institutional District, Section 2-1201. Intent and Purpose. The intent and purpose of the Institutional "I" District is to establish areas where public and private organizations can establish and operate institutions with a public interest in support of the quality of life of the citizens of the City of Clearwater without adversely impacting the integrity of adjacent residential neighborhoods, diminishing the scenic quality of the City of Clearwater or negatively impacting the safe and efficient movement of people and things within the City of Clearwater. The VFW is already located on the parcel, but the Zoning Atlas amendment is required to allow it to expand and/or add accessory structures as indicated is desired by the applicant. The proposed Institutional (I) District is compatible with the surrounding office and vehicle services uses in addition to the single family residential neighborhoods and cemetery. In addition, the proposal does not degrade the level of service for public facilities below the adopted standards (a detailed public facilities analysis follows in this report). Recommended Conclusions of Law: The request does not conflict with the goals, objectives and policies of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan and furthers said plan and the Community Development Code as indicated above. Compatibility with Surrounding Property/Character of the City & Neighborhood [Section 4-602.F.2, 4-602.F.3 and Section 4-602.F.41 Recommended Findings of Fact: Existing surrounding uses consist of offices (east and north), cemetery (south and southeast), vehicle services (west) and two single family homes (west). The proposed use of the subject property as a social club (currently developed as such) is compatible with the surrounding properties and neighborhood. The proposed Institutional (I) zoning district is consistent with the surrounding zoning districts that exist in the vicinity of the subject property. The proposed amendment will allow the existing VFW to potentially expand in the future, and the use will remain consistent and in character with the surrounding properties and neighborhood. Recommended Conclusions of Law: The proposed Office (0) zoning district is in character with the zoning districts in the area. Further, the proposal is compatible with surrounding uses and consistent with the character of the surrounding properties and neighborhood. Community Development Board —December 19, 2017 REZ2017-09008- Page 4 of 8 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT Level III Zoning Attas Amendment Review LONG RANGE PLANNING DIVISION Sufficiency of Public Facilities [Section 4-602.F.51 Recommended Findings of Fact: To assess the sufficiency of public facilities needed to support potential development on the proposed amendment area, the maximum development potential of the property under the present and requested City Future Land Use Map designations were analyzed (see Table 1). Even though this is a Zoning Atlas amendment application, maximum development potential is based on the underlying future land use, so for purposes of this analysis sufficiency of public facilities is based on the future land use map designation. Table 1. Development Potential for Existing & Proposed FL UM Designations As shown in the table, there is an increase in nonresidential development potential across the amendment area which would increase demand on most public facilities, but would not degrade them below acceptable levels as detailed below. The following analysis compares the maximum potential development of the proposed Institutional (1) future land use developed with a social club use (4,105 square feet) to the maximum development potential of the existing Residential/Office General (R/OG) future land use category developed with an office use (3,158 square feet). An increase in demand of the public facilities could be expected if the VFW expands; however, there is adequate capacity to serve the property. Potable Water The increase in development potential from this amendment would result in an increase in potable water use of 95.5 gallons per day. This is determined by comparing the potential potable water utilization of the maximum square footage allowed by the proposed land use developed with a social club use (410 gallons per day) to the potential utilization of an office built out to the maximum square footage allowed by the current land use designation (315 gallons per day). Wastewater The increase in development potential from this amendment would also result in an increase in wastewater production of 76 gallons per day. This is determined by comparing the potential wastewater generation of the proposed land use developed with a social club use (328 gallons) to the potential wastewater generation of the current land use designation developed with an office use (252 gallons). Community Development Board — December 19, 2017 REZ2017-09008- Page 5 of 8 Net Change Site Area 0.145 AC 0.145 AC (6,316 SF) (6,316 SF) Maximum 2 DUs 0 DUs -2 DUs Development 3,158 SF 4,105 SF 947 SF Potential 0.50 FAR 0.65 FAR 0.15 FAR Notes: 1. Residential uses not permitted through consistent Institutional (I) District Abbreviations: FLUM — Future Land Use Map DUs — Dwelling Units AC — Acres FAR — Floor Area Ratio SF — Square feet As shown in the table, there is an increase in nonresidential development potential across the amendment area which would increase demand on most public facilities, but would not degrade them below acceptable levels as detailed below. The following analysis compares the maximum potential development of the proposed Institutional (1) future land use developed with a social club use (4,105 square feet) to the maximum development potential of the existing Residential/Office General (R/OG) future land use category developed with an office use (3,158 square feet). An increase in demand of the public facilities could be expected if the VFW expands; however, there is adequate capacity to serve the property. Potable Water The increase in development potential from this amendment would result in an increase in potable water use of 95.5 gallons per day. This is determined by comparing the potential potable water utilization of the maximum square footage allowed by the proposed land use developed with a social club use (410 gallons per day) to the potential utilization of an office built out to the maximum square footage allowed by the current land use designation (315 gallons per day). Wastewater The increase in development potential from this amendment would also result in an increase in wastewater production of 76 gallons per day. This is determined by comparing the potential wastewater generation of the proposed land use developed with a social club use (328 gallons) to the potential wastewater generation of the current land use designation developed with an office use (252 gallons). Community Development Board — December 19, 2017 REZ2017-09008- Page 5 of 8 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT Level III Zoning Atlas Amendment Review LONG RANGE PLANNING DIVISION Solid Waste The proposed amendment could result in an increase of 15.7 tons per year of solid waste generated when comparing the amount of waste generated by a social club use to that of an office use. All solid waste disposal is handled by Pinellas County at the Pinellas County Waste -to -Energy Plant and the Bridgeway Acres Sanitary Landfill which has significant capacity. Additionally, the City provides a full-service citywide recycling program which diverts waste from the landfill, helping to extend the lifespan of Bridgeway Acres. There is excess solid waste capacity to serve the amendment area. Parkland The City's adopted LOS for parkland acreage, which is 4 acres per 1,000 population, will not be impacted by this proposed amendment. Under both the existing and proposed land use, the LOS citywide will remain at 15.46 acres per 1,000 population. Stormwater Site plan approval will be required before the property can be redeveloped. At that time, the stormwater management system for the site will be required to meet all City and SWFWMD stormwater management criteria. Streets The subject property is located on the north side of Tuskawilla Street approximately 90 feet west of South Myrtle Avenue. To evaluate potential impacts to streets, the typical traffic impacts figure (trips per day per acre) in the Countywide Rules for the corresponding Countywide Plan Map categories (current and proposed) are compared. The current number of trips per day (12 trips) is calculated based on the typical traffic generation numbers for the Office (0) category (89 trips per day per acre). The proposed Countywide Plan Map category of Public/Semi-Public (P/SP) (67 trips per day per acre) would decrease the amount of trips per day to 9 trips per day. This is a decrease of 3 trips per day compared to the number of trips under the current designation. Recommended Conclusions of Law: Based upon the findings of fact, it is determined that the proposed change will not result in the degradation of the existing levels of service for potable water, sanitary sewer, solid waste, parkland, stormwater management and streets. Community Development Board — December 19, 2017 REZ201.7-09008- Page 6 of 8 Level III Zoning Atlas Amendment Review PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT LONG RANGE PLANNING DIVISION Location of District Boundaries [Section 4-602.F.61 Recommended Findings of Fact: The location of the proposed Institutional (I) District is logical and consistent with the boundaries of the subject property (Lot 13). Recommended Conclusions of Law: The District boundaries are appropriately drawn in regard to location and classifications of streets, ownership lines, existing improvements and the natural environment. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: No amendment to the Zoning Atlas shall be recommended for approval or receive a final action of approval unless it complies with the standards contained in Section 4-602.17, Community Development Code. Table 2 below depicts the consistency of the proposed amendment with the standards pursuant to Section 4-602.F: Table 2. Consistency with Community Development Code Standards for Review F.1 The proposed amendment is consistent with and features X the goals, policies and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan and furthers the purposes of this Development Code and other city ordinances and actions designed to implement the plan. F.2 The available uses to which the property may be put are X appropriate to the property which is subject to the proposed amendment and compatible with existing and planned uses in the area. F.3 The amendment does not conflict with the needs and X character of the neighborhood and the city. F.4 The amendment will not adversely or unreasonably affect X the use of other property in the area. F.5 The amendment will not adversely burden public X facilities, including the traffic -carrying capacities of streets, in an unreasonably or disproportionate manner. F.6 The district boundaries are appropriately drawn with due X regard to locations and classifications of streets, ownership lines, existing improvements and the natural environment. Community Development Board — December 19, 2017 REZ2017-09008- Page 7 of 8 Level III Zoning Atlas Amendment Review PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT LONG RANGE PLANNING DIVISION Based on the foregoing, the Planning and Development Department recommends the following action: Recommend APPROVAL of the Zoning Atlas amendment from Office (0) District to Institutional (I) District. Prepared by Planning and Development Department Staff: Kyle Brotherton Senior Planner ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance No. 9098-18 Resume Photographs of Site and Vicinity Community Development Board —December 19, 2017 REZ2017-09008- Page 8 of 8 LU P2017-10010 This case involves 0.145 acres of a 0.288 -acre parcel located on the north side of tuskawilla street approximately 90 feet west of south myrtle avenue. The parcel, owned by Edward and James White Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFW) Post 10304 is comprised of two lots (13 and 14). The VFW is located on Lot 14, and has occupied that lot since 1976. They purchased the subject lot, Lot 13, in 2003. The VFW utilizes a 644 sq ft building on lot 14, and recently demolished a building that occupied lot 13. As a result of the previous property acquisition, the parcel currently has two future land use designations: institutional (1) on lot 14 recognizing the VFW's social club use, and Residential/Office General (R/OG) on lot 13, the proposed amendment area. The request is to amend the future land use map designation of the proposed area, lot 13, from residential/office general (r/og) to Institutional (1), thereby establishing a uniform future land use designation across the parcel. A request to rezone the property from the Office (o) district to the institutional (1) district is be processed concurrently with this case (REZ2017-10011). The VFW has indicated it would like to expand, add an accessory structure on the site; however, no site plan has been submitted at this time. The site is largely surrounded by offices to the north and east, but there are also two single family homes to the west. Additionally, a vehicle service use exists at the western end of tuskawilla street, and the Clearwater municipal cemetery is to the south and southeast of the site. As detailed in the staff report, the request does not conflict with the goals, objectives and policies of the comprehensive plan and furthers said plan as indicated in the goals and objectives listed. The request will necessitate an amendment to the countywide plan map from the office (0) category to the public/semi-public (P/SP) category in order to maintain consistency between the City's future land use map and the countywide plan map. This proposed amendment is consistent with the purposed of the proposed category in the countywide rules as detailed in the staff report. The proposed institutional (1) future land use category is in character with the future land use map designations in the area, and the proposal is compatible with the surrounding uses and consistent with the character of the surrounding properties and neighborhood. As detailed in the staff report, the proposed changes will not result in the degradation of the existing levels of service for potable water, sanitary sewer, solid waste, parkland, stormwater management and streets. No wetlands appear to be located on the subject property, and as such, it is determined that the proposed future land use map amendment will not negatively impact natural resources on the subject property. Staff recommends approval of the future land use map amendment from residential/office general (r/og) to institutional (1). REZ2017-10011 This is the companion case for LUP2017-10010. It is the same lot, lot 13, as the previous case, and amends the zoning atlas designation from office (o) to institutional (1). The proposal meets all of the standards for review as detailed in the staff report and staff is recommending approval of the zoning atlas amendment from Office (0) to Institutional (1). D p DRUID RD M �W ❑C9 10/9/2017 MAGNOLIA DR WO W❑_WC�..._..�LIA O � LOTUS -PATH .�0�� D� a LOTUS PATH W ' ti JEFWORDS PROJECT >❑Q� �> O n Q J GRAND CENTRAL ST SITE o I�JEFFORDS ST W 2co oy�Q� V Q = PINELLAS y0 C7 a = a =PINE LL ST 2 a -i ,,.j, Z to LU T S WILLA-S•T� y 0 ' 1 HH ••--- A ST LAKEVIEW RD ;- •mss .'-- 't i ST n Q SOUTH ST Q O C7 O OO � '? Y W z .: r;::.•::•; EST 3= KINGSLEY ST a m •`.�:���'.ENT .� M L� � QUEEN ST W `.??:'%BELLEVIEW BLVD BELLE�VUE BLVD '• WILDWOOD WAY co LOCATION MAP Owner(s): Esward and James White VFW Post 10304 Case: LUP2017-10010 REZ2017-10011 Site: 720 Tuskawilla Street Property Size (Acres): 0.145 Land Use Zoning PIN: 21-29-15-58068-016-0130 Residential/Office From: General (R/OG) Office (0) Atlas Page: 305B To: Institutional (1) Institutional (1) LUP2017-10010 REZ2017-10011 CLEARWATER CITY OF CARTER GAIL O TRE ATTN: CASH & INVESTMENTS MGR CARTER GARY F TRE PO BOX 4748 225 TURTLE CREEK CIR CLEARWATER FL 33758 OLDSMAR FL 34677 RIVES HOWARD P III CHACON RAFAEL S RIVES MARIE T PANELLAS AIDA-LUCRECIA A 1265 S MYRTLE AVE 805 PINELLAS ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 CLEARWATER FL 33756 FREEMAN EDMUND J JENNINGS THOMAS C III FREEMAN MARCIA R HALL-JENNINGS LORENE L 814 TUSKAWILLA ST 711 PINELLAS ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 CLEARWATER FL 33756 MYRTLE EXECUTIVE CENTER LLC VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS POST 311 PARK PLACE BLVD SUITE 600 724 TUSKAWILLA ST CLEARWATER FL 33759 CLEARWATER FL 33756 WILDE INDUSTRIES CORP CLEARWATER CITY OF 715 PINELLAS ST ATTN: CASH & INVESTMENTS MGR CLEARWATER FL 33756 PO BOX 4748 CLEARWATER FL 33758 ENGLANDER ENTERPRISES INC GIBSON CHARLES F 703 GRAND CENTRAL ST GIBSON JENNIFER E CLEARWATER FL 33756 12700 106TH ST LARGO FL 33773 MELCHER JERRY MYRTLE EXECUTIVE CENTER LLC MELCHER BARBARA 311 PARK PLACE BLVD SUITE 600 808 TUSKAWILLA ST CLEARWATER FL 33759 CLEARWATER FL 33756 GIBSON CHARLES F MYRTLE EXECUTIVE CENTER LLC GIBSON JENNIFER E 311 PARK PLACE BLVD SUITE600 12700 106TH ST CLEARWATER FL 33759 LARGO FL 33773 TOUCHTON ELBERT R PROPERTY TRUST # 803 TOUCHTON LORETTE M FARBER MICHELE TRE 721 PINELLAS ST PO BOX 7445 CLEARWATER FL 33756 CLEARWATER FL 33758 NOELL ROBERT E SINGH BELINDA NOELL JEAN L 900 NW SNUG HARBOR PO BOX 727 CRYSTAL RIVER FL 34428 OZONA FL 34660 POLLICK RICHARD 1458 S HILLCREST AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 GATLIN CHARLIE D 718 TUSKAWILLA ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 CLEARWATER CITY OF ATTN: CASH & INVESTMENTS MGR PO BOX 4748 CLEARWATER FL 33758 Board of County Commissioners 315 Court Street 5th Floor Clearwater FL 33756 Coalition of Clearwater Homeow, PO Box 8204 Clearwater FL 33758 Clearwater Neighborhood Coalit Carl Schrader President 1541 S. Frederica Avenue Clearwater FL 33756 CITY OF CLEARWATER PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE LAND USE PLAN AND ZONING ATLAS AMENDMENTS NOTE. All persons wishing to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the Community Development Board meeting. Those cases that are not contested by the applicant, staff, nei_ghborin_g property owners, etc, will be placed on a consent agenda and approved by a single vote at the beginning of the meeting. The City of Clearwater, Florida, proposes to adopt the following ordinances: ORDINANCE NO. 9097-18 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY, TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR A 0.145 -ACRE PORTION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF TUSKAWILLA STREET APPROXIMATELY 90 FEET WEST OF SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS 720 TUSKAWILLA STREET, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756, FROM RESIDENTIAL/OFFICE GENERAL (R/OG) TO INSTITUTIONAL (1); PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. ORDINANCE NO. 9098-18 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF THE CITY BY REZONING A 0.145 -ACRE PORTION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF TUSKAWILLA STREET APPROXIMATELY 90 FEET WEST OF SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS 720 TUSKAWILLA STREET, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756, FROM OFFICE (0) TO INSTITUTIONAL (1); PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Schedule of Public Hearings: Tuesday, December 19, 2017 before the Community Development Board, at 1:00 p.m. Thursday, January 18, 2018 before the City Council (15' Reading), at 6:00 p.m. Thursday, February 1, 2018 before the City Council (2nd Reading), at 6:00 p.m. All public hearings on the ordinances will be held in Council Chambers, 3rd floor of City Hall, 112 South Osceola Ave., Clearwater, Florida. (Edward and James White VFW Post 10304) LUP2017-10010/REZ2017-10011 Assigned Planner Kyle Brotherton, Senior Planner (727) 562-4626 Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearing or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning and Development Director or City Clerk prior to the hearing. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board or Council, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need to request a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Sec 4-206 states that party status shall be granted by the Board in quasi-judicial cases if the person requesting such status demonstrates that s/he is substantially affected. Party status entitles parties to personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross-examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests, and needs to be requested and obtained during the case discussion before the CDB. An oath will be administered swearing in all persons giving testimony in quasi-judicial public hearing cases. If you wish to speak at the meeting, please wait to be recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons without party status speaking before the CDB shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes. The Community Development Board will review the case and make a recommendation to the City Council for final disposition. Five days prior to the CDB meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning and Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756. Please contact the Planning Department 562-4567 to discuss any questions or concerns about the project and/or to better understand the proposal. Michael Delk Rosemarie Call, MPA, CMC Planning and Development Director City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 City Clerk YOU ARE BEING SENT THIS NOTICE IF YOU ARE THE APPLICANT OR OWN PROPERTY WITHIN 200 FT OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN OFFICIAL RECORDS & LEGISLATIVE SERVICES. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL (727) 562-4093 WITH THEIR REQUEST. Ad: 12/8/17 $ 1/19/17 ~ LE WATER BlUGHT ^DSFAUnnX- BAY TO REACH PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: December 19, 2017 AGENDA ITEM: F.I. CASE: LUP2017-10010 REQUEST: To amend the Future Land Use Map designation from Residential/Office General (R/OG) to Institutional (I) RECOMMENDATION: Approval GENERAL DATA: Applicant ......................... Robert Ankenbauer Owner ............................. Edward and James White VFW Post 10304 Location .......................... 720 Tuskawilla Street, located on the north side of Tuskawilla Street approximately 90 feet west of South Myrtle Avenue Property Size ................... 0.145 -acre portion of a 0.288 -acre parcel Background: This case involves 0.145 acres of a 0.288 -acre parcel located on the north side of Tuskawilla Street approximately 90 feet west of South Myrtle Avenue. The parcel, owned by Edward and James White Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFW) Post 10304 is comprised of two lots (Lots 13 and 14). The VFW has been located at the intersection of Tuskawilla Street and South Myrtle Avenue since 1976, and purchased the subject property (Lot 13) in 2003. The VFW utilizes a 644 square foot building located on Lot 14, and recently demolished a building that occupied Lot 13. As a result of the previous property acquisition, the parcel currently has two future land use designations: Institutional (I) on Lot 14 recognizing the VFW's social club use, and Residential/Office General (R/OG) on Lot 13, the proposed amendment area. Maps 1 and 2 show the general location of the property and an aerial view of the amendment area. The request is to change the Future Land Use Map designation of the proposed amendment area (Lot 13) from Residential/Office General (R/OG) to Institutional (1), thereby establishing a uniform future land use designation across the parcel. A request to rezone the proposed amendment area from the Office (0) District to the Institutional (I) District is being processed concurrently with this case (see REZ2017-10011). The VFW has indicated it would like to expand, adding an accessory structure on the site; however, no site plan has been submitted at this time. PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT Level III Comprehensive Plan Amendment Review LONG RANGE PLANNING DIVISION DRUG RO LJ. p�GP , JASMINE W, �. MAGNOLIA DR V y0' MAGNOLIA OR N ¢A ° _1 L07US PATH ..a - �. LOTUS PATH J� y JEFFORDS PROJECT `- JErwaos sr Z. W GRAND CENTRAL ST SITE [ w y 2 t PINELLAS ° C Y ti._S� ° U ¢ ' H w PINEL,1�._5' f 3 Q - WILLASI - AST 1 }}} tjjt}} LAKE PST t Ski SS �{ '¢�i _•_._.> E'L'Q w� LJ < { SOYTII .057 1 Y ! EST �FKINGSLEY' McLENNMIS SELLEVIEW I h' < BfLL FVUE 8I.VD - WILDWOODWAY LOCATION MAP Map 1 Vicinity Characteristics: Map 2 Map 3 shows the existing surrounding uses. The site is largely surrounded by offices, which are located to the west, north and east of the site, across South Myrtle Avenue. In addition, there are two single family homes and a vehicle service use to the west. To the south and southeast is the Clearwater Municipal Cemetery. ''' .-I,\'t ' Q 7 6 s I A I 3± 2 '1 1 �„ ffi9711 0 1 7 1 6 5 O.LI �.Je --- & ----- ---- - 1 Offices 1 1 J i 1„ tt 1 13 I 1A 1 i s IS �I� O4ce! b PTNELLAS ST a � 1 maes f3 Ia 2 1 1 p 6 2 1 t 9 8 7S ng!"�m A' 3+ sl O 1 ,J �4 V 6� 19 �1113 , Ifi 1716 �1 TUSKAW/LLA ST t l I i f I 1 I , @ TUSKAWKLA ST 2 I ,CeihetnrY i 1 I 7 1 6 S I A, 3 1 2 1 1 ' _ i - ,r 1 , 1 Cemetery A' 9 1 11 1 12 t I 1 9'19i1� 7 1 Aa 8/3 1 1L_ O 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 3.8 Acca x EXISTING SURROUNDING USES MAP Map 3 Community Development Board — December 19, 2017 LUP2017-10010 - Page 2 of 8 r Afti. .Y 1 7 Ilk t .I .. �, ., % Z JFK t{ iLLA Yt4f. S 1; S7 1 y 4 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH Map 2 Map 3 shows the existing surrounding uses. The site is largely surrounded by offices, which are located to the west, north and east of the site, across South Myrtle Avenue. In addition, there are two single family homes and a vehicle service use to the west. To the south and southeast is the Clearwater Municipal Cemetery. ''' .-I,\'t ' Q 7 6 s I A I 3± 2 '1 1 �„ ffi9711 0 1 7 1 6 5 O.LI �.Je --- & ----- ---- - 1 Offices 1 1 J i 1„ tt 1 13 I 1A 1 i s IS �I� O4ce! b PTNELLAS ST a � 1 maes f3 Ia 2 1 1 p 6 2 1 t 9 8 7S ng!"�m A' 3+ sl O 1 ,J �4 V 6� 19 �1113 , Ifi 1716 �1 TUSKAW/LLA ST t l I i f I 1 I , @ TUSKAWKLA ST 2 I ,CeihetnrY i 1 I 7 1 6 S I A, 3 1 2 1 1 ' _ i - ,r 1 , 1 Cemetery A' 9 1 11 1 12 t I 1 9'19i1� 7 1 Aa 8/3 1 1L_ O 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 3.8 Acca x EXISTING SURROUNDING USES MAP Map 3 Community Development Board — December 19, 2017 LUP2017-10010 - Page 2 of 8 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT Level III Comprehensive Plan Amendment Review LONG RANGE PLANNING DIVISION As shown on Map 4, the abutting future land use designations are Residential/Office General (R/OG) and Institutional (I). The surrounding vicinity has areas designated Industrial Limited (IL) to the west and northwest, and Residential Urban (RU) farther east, across South Myrtle Avenue. A comparison between the uses, densities and intensities allowed by the present and proposed Future Land Use Map designations appears in Table 1, along with the consistent zoning districts. Map 4 Map 5 Table 1. Uses, Densities and Intensities Allowed by Present and Proposed Future Land Use Designations Community Development Board — December 19, 2017 LUP2017-10010 - Page 3 of 8 Medium Density Residential; Public/Private Schools; Social Primary Uses: Residential Equivalent; Office Clubs; Public Offices; Residential Equivalent Maximum Density: 15 Dwelling Units Per Acre 12.5 Dwelling Units Per Acre Maximum FAR 0.50; ISR 0.75 FAR 0.65; ISR 0.85 Intensity: Consistent Zoning Medium Density Residential (MDR); Institutional (I) Districts: Office (0) Community Development Board — December 19, 2017 LUP2017-10010 - Page 3 of 8 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT Level M Comprehensive Plan Amendment Review LONG RANGE PLANNING DIVISION REVIEW CRITERIA: Consistency with the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan [Sections 4-603.F.1 and 4-603.F.21 Recommended Findings of Fact: Applicable goals and objectives of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan which support the proposed amendment include: Goal A.2 A sufficient variety and amount of future land use categories shall be provided to accommodate public demand and promote infill development. Goal A.4. The City shall work toward a land use pattern that can be supported by the available community and public facilities that would be required to serve the development. Objective A.4.1 The City's Concurrency Management System will ensure that compatibility of all proposed development with the capacities of the existing and planned support facilities for which a level of service has been adopted. Objective A.6.4 Due to the built -out character of the city of Clearwater, compact urban development within the urban service area shall be promoted through application of the Clearwater Community Development Code. The VFW is already located on the parcel, but the future land use amendment is required to allow it to utilize the additional portion of the property for future expansion and/or accessory uses. The proposed Institutional (1) future land use designation is compatible with the surrounding office uses and cemetery. It is also compatible with the small number of single family houses in the neighborhood. In addition, the proposal does not degrade the level of service for public facilities below the adopted standards (a detailed public facilities analysis follows in this report). Recommended Conclusions of Law: The request does not conflict with the goals, objectives and policies of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan and furthers said plan as indicated in the goals and objectives listed above. Consistency with the Countywide Rules Recommended Findings of Fact: The underlying Countywide Plan Map category on the proposed amendment area is Office (0). The proposed amendment area is on the edge of two districts, with Office (0) also on the surrounding properties to the north and west, and Public/Semi-Public (P/SP) to the east and south. The proposed City of Clearwater future land use designation of Institutional (I) will necessitate an amendment from the Office (0) category to the Public/Semi-Public (P/SP) category in order to maintain consistency between the City's Future Land Use Map and the Countywide Plan Map. Section 2.3.3.10 of the Countywide Rules states that the Public/Semi-Public (P/SP) category is intended to recognize institutional and transportation/utility uses that serve the community or region, especially larger facilities having acreage exceeding the thresholds established in other plan categories, and which are Community Development Board — December 19, 2017 LUP2017-10010 - Page 4 of 8 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT Level ill Comprehensive Plan Amendment Review LONG RANGE PLANNING DIVISION consistent with the need, character, and scale of such uses relative to the surrounding uses, transportation facilities, and natural resource features. The proposed use, as indicated by the applicant, is a social club use, which is an appropriate use within the area and is consistent with the proposed and surrounding Countywide Plan Map categories. Recommended Conclusions of Law: The proposed Future Land Use Map amendment is consistent with the purpose of the proposed category in the Countywide Rules. Compatibility with Surrounding Properties/Character of the City & Neighborhood [Section 4-603.F.3 and Section 4-603.F.6] Recommended Findings of Fact: Existing surrounding uses consist of offices (north and east), cemetery (south and southeast), single family residential (west and east) and vehicle services (west). The continued use of the subject property as an expanded social club is compatible with the surrounding properties and neighborhood. The proposed Institutional (I) future land use category primarily permits institutional development at a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of 0.65. Residential equivalent uses are permitted at a density of 3 beds per dwelling unit at 12.5 dwelling units per acre. The future land use designations of surrounding properties include Residential/Office General (R/OG), Institutional (I) and Industrial Limited (IL). The proposed Institutional (I) future land use category, which primarily allows for institutional uses such as churches, social clubs, schools, or residential equivalent uses, is consistent with the surrounding future land use designations that exist in the vicinity of the subject property. The proposed amendment will allow the existing VFW to potentially expand in the future, and the use will remain consistent and in character with the surrounding properties and neighborhood. Recommended Conclusions of Law: The proposed Institutional (I) future land use category is in character with the Future Land Use Map designations in the area. Further, the proposal is compatible with surrounding uses and consistent with the character of the surrounding properties and neighborhood. Sufficiency of Public Facilities [Section 4-603.F.41 Recommended Findings of Fact: To assess the sufficiency of public facilities needed to support potential development on the proposed amendment area, the maximum development potential of the property under the present and requested City Future Land Use Map designations were analyzed. Community Development Board — December 19, 2017 LUP201.7-10010 - Page 5 of 8 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT Level III Comprehensive Plan Amendment Review LONG RANGE PLANNING DIVISION Table 2. Development Potential for Existing & Proposed FL UM Designations As shown in the table, there is an increase in nonresidential development potential across the amendment area which would increase demand on most public facilities, but would not degrade them below acceptable levels as detailed below. The following analysis compares the maximum potential development of the proposed Institutional (1) future land use developed with a social club use (4,105 square feet) to the maximum development potential of the existing Residential/Office General (R/OG) future land use category developed with an office use (3,158 square feet). An increase in demand of the public facilities could be expected if the VFW expands; however, there is adequate capacity to serve the property. Potable Water The increase in development potential from this amendment would result in an increase in potable water use of 95.5 gallons per day. This is determined by comparing the potential potable water utilization of the maximum square footage allowed by the proposed land use developed with a social club use (410 gallons per day) to the potential utilization of an office built out to the maximum square footage allowed by the current land use designation (315 gallons per day). Wastewater The increase in development potential from this amendment would also result in an increase in wastewater production of 76 gallons per day. This is determined by comparing the potential wastewater generation of the proposed land use developed with a social club use (328 gallons) to the potential wastewater generation of the current land use designation developed with an office use (252 gallons). Solid Waste The proposed amendment could result in an increase of 15.7 tons per year of solid waste generated when comparing the amount of waste generated by a social club use to that of an office use. All solid waste disposal is handled by Pinellas County at the Pinellas County Waste -to -Energy Plant and the Bridgeway Acres Sanitary Landfill which has significant capacity. Additionally, the City provides a full-service citywide recycling program which diverts waste from the landfill, helping to extend the lifespan of Bridgeway Acres. There is excess solid waste capacity to serve the amendment area. Community Development Board — December 19, 2017 LUP2017-10010 - Page 6 of 8 Net Change Site Area 0.145 AC 0.145 AC (6,316 SF) (6,316 SF) Maximum 2 DUs 0 DUs -2 DUs Development 3,1.58 SF 4,105 SF 947 SF Potential 0.50 FAR 0.65 FAR 0.15 FAR Notes: 1. Residential uses not permitted through consistent Institutional (1) District Abbreviations: FLUM — Future Land Use Map DUs — Dwelling Units AC — Acres FAR — Floor Area Ratio SF — Square feet As shown in the table, there is an increase in nonresidential development potential across the amendment area which would increase demand on most public facilities, but would not degrade them below acceptable levels as detailed below. The following analysis compares the maximum potential development of the proposed Institutional (1) future land use developed with a social club use (4,105 square feet) to the maximum development potential of the existing Residential/Office General (R/OG) future land use category developed with an office use (3,158 square feet). An increase in demand of the public facilities could be expected if the VFW expands; however, there is adequate capacity to serve the property. Potable Water The increase in development potential from this amendment would result in an increase in potable water use of 95.5 gallons per day. This is determined by comparing the potential potable water utilization of the maximum square footage allowed by the proposed land use developed with a social club use (410 gallons per day) to the potential utilization of an office built out to the maximum square footage allowed by the current land use designation (315 gallons per day). Wastewater The increase in development potential from this amendment would also result in an increase in wastewater production of 76 gallons per day. This is determined by comparing the potential wastewater generation of the proposed land use developed with a social club use (328 gallons) to the potential wastewater generation of the current land use designation developed with an office use (252 gallons). Solid Waste The proposed amendment could result in an increase of 15.7 tons per year of solid waste generated when comparing the amount of waste generated by a social club use to that of an office use. All solid waste disposal is handled by Pinellas County at the Pinellas County Waste -to -Energy Plant and the Bridgeway Acres Sanitary Landfill which has significant capacity. Additionally, the City provides a full-service citywide recycling program which diverts waste from the landfill, helping to extend the lifespan of Bridgeway Acres. There is excess solid waste capacity to serve the amendment area. Community Development Board — December 19, 2017 LUP2017-10010 - Page 6 of 8 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT Level III Comprehensive Plan Amendment Review LONG RANGE PLANNING DIVISION The City's adopted LOS for parkland acreage, which is 4 acres per 1,000 population, will not be impacted by this proposed amendment. Under both the existing and proposed land use, the LOS citywide will remain at 15.46 acres per 1,000 population. Stormwater Site plan approval will be required before the property can be redeveloped. At that time, the stormwater management system for the site will be required to meet all City and SWFWMD stormwater management criteria. Streets The subject property is located on the north side of Tuskawilla Street approximately 90 feet west of South Myrtle Avenue. To evaluate potential impacts to streets, the typical traffic impacts figure (trips per day per acre) in the Countywide Rules for the corresponding Countywide Plan Map categories (current and proposed) are compared. The current number of trips per day (12 trips) is calculated based on the typical traffic generation numbers for the Office (0) category (89 trips per day per acre). The proposed Countywide Plan Map category of Public/Semi-Public (P/SP) (67 trips per day per acre) would decrease the amount of trips per day to 9 trips per day. This is a decrease of 3 trips per day compared to the number of trips under the current designation. Recommended Conclusions of Law: Based upon the findings of fact, it is determined that the proposed change will not result in the degradation of the existing levels of service for potable water, sanitary sewer, solid waste, parkland, stormwater management and streets. Impact on Natural Resources [Section 4-603.F.51 Recommended Findings of Fact: No wetlands appear to be located on the subject property. The City's codes require that development is compliant with the City's tree preservation, landscaping and stormwater management requirements. Recommended Conclusions of Law: Based upon the findings of fact, it is determined that the proposed Future Land Use Map amendment will not negatively impact natural resources on the subject property. Community Development Board — December 19, 2017 LUP2017- 100 10 - Page 7 of 8 Level nI Comprehensive Plan Amendment Review SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT LONG RANGE PLANNING DIVISION No amendment to the Comprehensive Plan or Future Land Use Map shall be recommended for approval or receive a final action of approval unless it complies with the standards contained in Section 4-603.17, Community Development Code. Table 3 below depicts the consistency of the proposed amendment with the standards pursuant to Section 4-603.F: Table 3. Consistency with Community Development Code Standards for Review F.1 The amendment will further implementation of the X Comprehensive Plan consistent with the goals, policies and objectives contained in the Plan. F.2 The amendment is not inconsistent with other provisions X of the Comprehensive Plan. F.3 The available uses, if applicable, to which the properties X may be put are appropriate to the properties in question and compatible with existing and planned uses in the area. F.4 Sufficient public facilities are available to serve the X properties. F.5 The amendment will not adversely affect the natural X environment. F.6 The amendment will not adversely impact the use of X Dronerties in the immediate area. Based on the foregoing, the Planning and Development Department recommends the following action: Recommend APPROVAL of the Future Land Use Map Amendment from Residential/Office General (R/OG) to Institutional (I). Prepared by Planning and Development Department Staff: Kyle Brotherton Senior Planner ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance No. 9097-18 Resume Photographs of Site and Vicinity Community .Development Board — December 19, 2017 LUP2017-10010 - Page 8 of 8 CLEARWATER BRUGI I AND BEAU'U'li'T.IL • BAY TO BEACH Case # LUP2017-10010; REZ2017-10011 SIGN POSTING ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I hereby acknowledge that the sign required for this case being considered by the City of Clearwater for a land use and zoning atlas amendment was posted a minimum of 10 days before the Community Development Board meeting. The sign was posted on the subject property in a location where it is capable of being read from the most significant adjacent street. Planning & Development Department Staff: Print ame Sign Name Community Development Board Date: City Council Public Hearing Dates: • January 18, 2018 (1St reading) • February 1, 2017 (2nd reading) Date Posted December 8, 2017 Photo of sign uploaded into Accela tZ- I i- la Date December 19, 2017 Deadline to Post December 9, 2017 Land Use Plan and/or Zoning Atlas Amendment Map Request Planner Name: Kyle Brotherton Case Number: LUP2017-10010 and REZ2017-10011 Date Request Submitted: 10/4/2017 Date Requested for: 10/18/2017 Full Page Copies of the Following Maps Required (For Ordinance): ® Future Land Use Map ® Zoning Map Electronic Copies of the Following Maps Required (For Staff Report): ® Future Land Use Map ® Zoning Map ® Location Map ® Aerial Photograph ® Existing Surrounding Uses Map ® 2" x 2" PDF Map (for Newspaper) Required Documents to be submitted to Engineering ® Legal Description (warranty deed or survey) ® Map with Proposed Site Highlighted ❑ EDR - no hard copies submitted - all submission material is accessible through Accela Location Language (for Ordinance Title) Location: On the north side of Lakeview Roaa roximat I 0 f t ast of South Highland Avenue. PROVIDED LEGAL DESCRIPTION VERIFIED BY: d Thomas ahony, SM, a aphic Tech of y Manager MAP NAME Owner(s): Esward and James White VFW Post 10304 Case: LUP2017-10010 REZ2017-10011 Site: 720 Tuskawilla Street Property Size(Acres): 0.145 Land Use Zoning PIN: 21-29-15-58068-016-0130 Residential/Office From: Office (0) General (R/OG) Atlas Page: 3058 To: Institutional (1) Institutional (1) SA\Planning Department\C D B\Land Use Amendments\Active Caseffuskawilla St 720 LUP2017-10010 - Edward and James White VFW Post 10304\Maps\LUP2017-10010; REZ2017-10011 Map Request.docx V:\GIS\P1anning\P1anning Requests\Land Use Zoning\LUP2017-10010, REZ2017-1.0011\IocLUP2017-10010; REZ2017-10011.docx DRUID RD ❑❑ d `a � h W - - — - �~ ❑, ❑ MAGNOLIA a JASMINE z z 0§1 Rev. 10/9/2017 , a Z DR W W❑W �8❑ LOTUS=PATH �y0 MAGNOLIA DR D D i--, a �DS LOTUS PATH o o J :Ey JEFFORJEFFORDS ST ❑¢ �' � PROJECT m GRAND SITE CENTRAL ST� O Z J � W y y oy❑Q� = PINELLAS 0 = a ❑� PINELLAS ST Z y ijo- • yW y�.�';.; 0 T WILLA-ST ❑ j AST LAKEVIEW RD —�-B ST S :::� W • . . Q .•' � W W QS� ;.. ST IQ Q SOUTH ST p Z 2 W ❑ y O W Q. :' ESTDi = KINGSLEY ST r"l7 — m� EL N AN ST QUEEN ST W �'• BELLEVIEW BLVD Q Z BLVD WILDWOOD WAY g �' LOCATION MAP Owner(s): Esward and James White VFW Post 10304 Case: LUP2017-10010 REZ2017-10011 Site: 720 Tuskawilla Street Property Size(Acres): 0.145 Land Use Zoning PIN: 21-29-15-58068-016-0130 Residential/Office From: Office (0) General (R/OG) Atlas Page: 3056 To: Institutional (1) Institutional (1) V:\GIS\P1anning\P1anning Requests\Land Use Zoning\LUP2017-10010, REZ2017-1.0011\IocLUP2017-10010; REZ2017-10011.docx m V:\GIS\Planning\Planning Requests\Land Use Zoning\LUP2017-10010, REZ2017-10011\aerLUP2017-10010; REZ2017-1001 I.doex V:\GISTIanningTianning Requests\Land Use Zoning\LUP2017-10010, REZ2017-10011\fluLUP2017-10010; REZ2017-10011.docx I]1314 12271 1 1 •- 2 1 1 I 12291 1231 I 1 In a r 0 7 6 5 4 1 3W 91817 Iq 12331Q 1 65 —_W 1235/�-{}�/�1—� t23Z�/.� / / /■ �— Rev. 10/9/20171239 Imo/ V�/1 — 13 1 14 Q 8 I 9 10 1 I1�1243111 12411 f 12 13 14 15 16 ^ . 80681 ti 1245 1247163.9 1 12511 o w oNo ocVa PINELLAS ST o 0 1 cLO No 1 1 60 1 i 1 116 aV MLO•- /� M co 00 v00 Go 3 1 2 —I-1 7, 6 5 _ I 3 2 I 1 v 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 1 13 I^ %� I I Q4 1% I 8 1 9 10 11 12 13 14 I 6 17 19 14 15 1 1 01 0 o v [15 16 I I ^1 i U—'1 IL.50 TUSKAWILLA ST 001 Iv I loo TUSKAW/LLA ST I 30 2 / 1 1 8 1 7 1 6 5 1 4 1 3 2 1 1 1 1 1 I r � 1 1 30 1 I I 4 1� I 10 i 1�1 i 911134 1 12 ��/os O I B /3 1 I I 1__ _i 1 zz/oa 3.8 Ac(c) 0 30 33 33 33 FUTURE LAND USE MAP Owner(s): Esward and James White VFW Post 10304 Case: LUP2017-10010 REZ2017-1001 1 Site: 720 Tuskawilla Street Property Size (Acres): 0.145 Land Use Zoning PIN: 21-29-15-58068-016-0130 Residential/Office From: General (R/OG) Office (0) Atlas Page: 305B To: Institutional (1) Institutional (1) V:\GISTIanningTianning Requests\Land Use Zoning\LUP2017-10010, REZ2017-10011\fluLUP2017-10010; REZ2017-10011.docx VAGISTianningTIanning Requests\Land Use Zoning\LUP2017-10010, REZ2017-1001 I\zonLUP2017-10010; REZ2017-10011.docx 12271I 112291 I co 2 1 1 1 1 11230 1231 1 01 Q 7 1 6 5 1 1 4 1 3 12 1 1 1 12331 8 1 I 1 7 1 6 5 a > -—-— p--�——-— 1 — — T — — N — — — — — — — --—--- -+ — — — — — Q J 1235,——�— �3Z _ — i— _ Rev. to/s/2017 ' 1 1 J 1 1 I 1239 1 13 I 14 8 9 10 1 11 12 I 13 I 14 —L —11 1 � 1241 111431 11 1 1 12 13 14 15 16 oo ^ 1� 0 8068 I 1 �� —� ti 12471 1 N It 63';9 I O 12491 1251 0 o 1 e- e� N N CO 00 00 00 PI'NELLAS ST o 0 hill so 1 I I 116 O coo 000 00 0`00 Oo 00 3 1 2 1 1 7 1 6 5 3 2 1 125 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 1 13 I^- 4�4 17 V 8 1 9 10 11 121131'4 1PB 1 1 1 1 1 c1 0 1IZ314 5 F- 617819 14 151 16 1 I_— 1 �I i ►. 50 1I 080 I 2 1 DUS4-4W LLA,ST I 001 la � I I� TUSKAWILLA ST 2D I 1 I I 1 I I i I � 30 2 / 1 18 1 7 1 6 1 5 1 4 1 3 1 2 1 1 I 1 I I 1 30 4s ' 14 1 9 1 10 1 11 I —, 12 B/ 1 0134 1 i 11/05 /3/ 1 1 I I 3.8 Ac(c) 3 30 0 33 33 f �'� (� r- 33 ZONING MAP Owner(s): Esward and James White VFW Post 10304 Case: LUP2017-10010 R EZ2017-1001 1 Site: 720 Tuskawilla Street Property Size(Acres): 0.145 Land Use Zoning PIN: 21-29 15-58068-016-0130- Residential/Office From: General (R/OG) Office (0) Atlas Page: 305B To: Institutional (1) Institutional (1) VAGISTianningTIanning Requests\Land Use Zoning\LUP2017-10010, REZ2017-1001 I\zonLUP2017-10010; REZ2017-10011.docx I I I I 1 12291 1 ^ A 00 2 11 I I I I 1 11230 I 12311 ' ' 1 —T — Q Q 7 1 6 5 4 1 3 12 1 1 —0 -—•--- — — — —— Q 1233' 8 1 7 1 6 5 1235' —~— —,-———�{—-— I W 1237 _ —'— Rev. 10/9/2017 I 1 I I I I � 1239 — — I 13 I 14 8 9 10 11 . 12 I 13 1 14 of 1 r ---I- —��— ---� I yam. z 12411I 111431 11 1 12 13 14 15 16 1 I oto 08468 1 ul 1245 I 1 0 _ I( 12471 12511 1 w w oNo cNo PINELLAS ST O Cli 1 I 60to ^ ^ 1 ^ czo 03 N Q I I I 16 000 V- oNo oNo 3 2 1 1 — — —1— 1 7 1 6 5 3 2 1 1 — — 4 125 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 f 13—IN— � --1—- — If ir 11 U4 1 17 I 8 1 9 10 11 1213 141 1 1 112314 5 1 1 617 819 14 151 16 OI c I I --— V - —N s4 I 3A0 211 I TUSKAW/LLA STT 0 1 ler IoNo TUSKAWILLA ST 2 D1 I I � i 1 i I i I i 30 2 i / 1 1 8 1 7 1 6 5 1 4 1 3 2 1 1 r I I I 1 30 4s / 4 1 9 1 10 1 11 I 12 911134 I� lvos O B911134 /3/1 r—J zz/oa 1 3.8 Ac(c) 30 3 0 33 33 33 EXISTING SURROUNDING USES MAP Owner(s): Esward and James White VFW Post 10304 Case: LUP2017-10010 R EZ2017-10011 Site: 720 Tuskawilla Street Property Si7f-(Acres); 0.145 Land Use Zoning PIN: 21-29-15-58068-016-0130 Residential/Office From: General (R/OG) Office (0) Atlas Paqe: To: Institutional (1) Institutional (1) 3456 V:\G1S\P1anning\P1anning Requests\Land Use Zoning\LUP2017-10010, REZ2017-10011\exiLUP2017-10010; REZ2017-1001 I.docx PINELLAS ST I TUSKAWILLA S This Warranty Deed made this 20A, day of October, 2003 between Harlan Johnson and Cloyce Johnson, husband and `rife whose post office address is 29. Velria Dr., Largo, FL 33770, grantor, and Edward & James White Post #10304 Vererants of Foreign Wars of the'tinited States, a Florida not for profit corporation whose post office address is 724 Tuskaivilla Street, Clearwater, FL 33756,..g" tee: (Whenever used herein the terms "grantor" and "greniec'`nc3ude.a}.litle parties to this instrument and the heirs, legal representatives, and assigns of individuals, and the successors and assigns of corporations, tnrstsW tnrstce§j<; Witnesseth, that said grantor, for and in conAeration of t* sum of TEN AND N0/100 DOLLARS (S10.00) and other good and valuable considerations to said grantorin. hand paid by said, grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, and sold to the said grantee :;%rid grantpe7 heirs and assigns forever, the following described land, situate, lying and being in Pinellas County, Florida to -wit: Lot 13, Block 16, MILTON PARK, according to ,map:: or'ptgt thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 1, Page 69 of the Public Records of Pinellas County 10:1:rkft ; Parcel Identification Number: 21-29-15-58068-01&0130 and Lot 14, Block 16, MILTON PARK, according to map or plat: thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 1, Page 69, LESS AND EXCEPT that portion Deeded to the Se`of Florida in OR Book 151, Page 215, filed for record August 12, 1957; AND LESS ALSO that part Deeded n 4R;"io k 885, Page 115, filed for record April 22, 1960, all inthe Public Records of pinellas Count:`Florida J. Parcel Identification Number: 21-29-15-58068416-0140 Together with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertain . To Have and to Hold the same is fee simple forever. And the grantor hereby covenants with said grantee that the grantor is lawfully seized of said land in.:. -fee simple; than: grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land; that the grantor hereby fully warfants the1itle'tn's land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever, and that said land is free of encumbrances, except taxes accruing subsequent to December 31, 2002. In, Witness Whereof, grantor has hereunto set grantor's hand and seal the day and year first above written. Doublertme® KAK0 F. DE P -MR, CM OF MT PIELLAS MNTY, FUID1 (M) 464-3008 4CM73 10-22-2M 16:57:10 RF 51 DED -UNITE 000001 s PAGES - 15:03452392 B :13161 x'6:0307 EPG: MB Stephen: G VVgtts CHG AW ---' SIE 002 P 1 $10.50 ;,::.. Attorstey at:aw CKAr rr �-- _ DOC STAMP �- DR219 3 $315.00 Stephen G.;`attsy. PSA. 809 Druid., ad flg 9 TOTAL: $325.50 _____� Clearwater .-%%L 3375.6:`: `" _ 'tfilT. -" Nf . TUM: $M5.50 727-4x1 CHANGE: $.00 File Number: 6468 Pic`:;. '-'—'r BY DEPUTY M( Will Call No.: 495 REV �— ;3t3iAL Space Above This Line For Recording Datal— 03-452392 OCT -22-2003 4 :57 pr1 PI NELLAS CO BK 13161 PS 387 i Warranty Deed IIIIIf11ERMUD1111llONIM11l This Warranty Deed made this 20A, day of October, 2003 between Harlan Johnson and Cloyce Johnson, husband and `rife whose post office address is 29. Velria Dr., Largo, FL 33770, grantor, and Edward & James White Post #10304 Vererants of Foreign Wars of the'tinited States, a Florida not for profit corporation whose post office address is 724 Tuskaivilla Street, Clearwater, FL 33756,..g" tee: (Whenever used herein the terms "grantor" and "greniec'`nc3ude.a}.litle parties to this instrument and the heirs, legal representatives, and assigns of individuals, and the successors and assigns of corporations, tnrstsW tnrstce§j<; Witnesseth, that said grantor, for and in conAeration of t* sum of TEN AND N0/100 DOLLARS (S10.00) and other good and valuable considerations to said grantorin. hand paid by said, grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, and sold to the said grantee :;%rid grantpe7 heirs and assigns forever, the following described land, situate, lying and being in Pinellas County, Florida to -wit: Lot 13, Block 16, MILTON PARK, according to ,map:: or'ptgt thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 1, Page 69 of the Public Records of Pinellas County 10:1:rkft ; Parcel Identification Number: 21-29-15-58068-01&0130 and Lot 14, Block 16, MILTON PARK, according to map or plat: thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 1, Page 69, LESS AND EXCEPT that portion Deeded to the Se`of Florida in OR Book 151, Page 215, filed for record August 12, 1957; AND LESS ALSO that part Deeded n 4R;"io k 885, Page 115, filed for record April 22, 1960, all inthe Public Records of pinellas Count:`Florida J. Parcel Identification Number: 21-29-15-58068416-0140 Together with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertain . To Have and to Hold the same is fee simple forever. And the grantor hereby covenants with said grantee that the grantor is lawfully seized of said land in.:. -fee simple; than: grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land; that the grantor hereby fully warfants the1itle'tn's land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever, and that said land is free of encumbrances, except taxes accruing subsequent to December 31, 2002. In, Witness Whereof, grantor has hereunto set grantor's hand and seal the day and year first above written. Doublertme® P f NELLAS COUNTY FLR . OFF . REC . BK 13151 PG 388 livered y*i pur presence: Ian Jo on [Notary Seal1 My Warranty Deed - Page 2 Qctober, 200 by Harlan Johnson and Cloyce Stephea G. Watts Ca�mfsdaoz � tm14�b'A e En 6cum DoubleTimee ._dr I � i GO Di i I L_j PINELLAS ST W 6 i 1 —, I, ( 4 13 2 II 1 1 (1 TZ 7 1 16 t J II 3 1,30 I 1 w _ I_ 58048 2 �_ 11240 6 8 $ I �9 j 1 ._dr I � i GO Di i I L_j PINELLAS ST Q 71 I I 1 —, I, ( 4 13 2 II 1 1 7 1 16 1 5 11 4 II 3 1,30 I 1 111 I 12� I h3 i 14 1 L_� 1 I I I t 1 I I I 1 $ I �9 j 1 10 11 11 118068 11 12� . q3 14J1 1 1 W O O PINELLAS ST �J .ter. . OWMA D Engineering Department Geographic Techriology Divisic 100 S. Myrtle Ave, Clearwater, FL Ph: (727)562-4750, Fax: (727)526-d www.MyClearwater.com Disclaimer. Public information data is furnished by the City of Clearu Department, and must be accepted and used by the r understanding that the data received was collected fo developing a graphic infrastructure inventory. As st Clearwater makes no warranties, expressed or imphea accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of ti other particular use. Furthermore, the City of Clearw:: liability whatsoever associated with the use or misus Notice: This map may not incorporate the latest field information. For th depiction of this infrastructure, consult the City of Clearwater's I Applications at: http:llclearwaterlGISfindexasp N W E 200 100 0 S Feet Legend 1234 Address 123 MHP Lot Number 12345 Subdivision/Condo Numk C - Refer to Plat) Block Number Sub -Parcel Number 32/Oz Parcel Number (M&B) —> Land Hook (Common Ov► Platted Subdivision Boun Lot Ownership Line September 21, 2017 DEPARTMENT OF FLORIDA DISTRICT 9 To Whom It May Concern: Veterans of Foreign Wars 1720 TUSKAWILLA ST EZ2�� 0011 /000 FW post 10304 '�D,ning: Office Atlas #: 3056 This letter will serve as confirmation that under Section 709 of the Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States Congressional Charter By -Laws, Post Commander, Robert Ankenbauer and Quartermaster, Charles Koss are duly authorized to sign legal documents and/or contractual obligations on -behalf of the Edward and James White VFW Post 10304 located at 724 Tuskawilla Street, Clearwater, Florida 33756-3450 Should you need any further information, feel free to contact me. Respectfully, Wendell Estell, District 9 Commander Department of Florida Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States 200183' Ave N Lot 1042 Saint Petersburg, FL 33702 727-479-7574 Cc: Robert Ankenbauer, Commander Edward and James White VFW Post 10304 FORMind PINELLAS P: (727) 464.8250 F: (727) 464.8212 forwardpinellas.org 310 Court Street Clearwater, FL 33756 May 11, 2018 Mayor George Cretekos City of Clearwater PO Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33756-4748 RE: May 8, 2018 CPA Follow-up for City of Clearwater Case CW 18-08 Dear Mayor Cretekos: At its May 8, 2018 meeting, the Board of County Commissioners, acting as the Countywide Planning Authority, took action to approve Case CW 18-08 which was initiated by your city. The ordinance associated with this action is attached. / Sin erely, t i, it nto , FAICP Executive Director Enclosure cc: Michael Delk, Director of Planning INTEGRATING LAND USE & TRANSPORTATION ORDINANCE NO. 18- 18 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE COUNTYWIDE PLAN MAP OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY ACTION ON CASE NUMBER CW 18-08 INITIATED BY THE CITY OF CLEARWATER AND TRANSMITTED TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS IN ITS CAPACITY AS THE COUNTYWIDE PLANNING AUTHORITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIAL ACT; PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENT TO THE PLAN; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR FILING OF THE ORDINANCE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, a proposed amendment to the Countywide Plan Map, which is an element of the Countywide Plan of Pinellas County, Florida, has been presented at a public hearing to the Board of County Commissioners in its capacity as the Countywide Planning Authority; and WHEREAS, notices of public hearings have been accomplished as required by Chapter 2012-245, Laws of Florida; and WHEREAS, procedures of the Special Act and County Charter have been followed concerning Forward Pinellas, in its role as the Pinellas Planning Council, and the Countywide Planning Authority, for the proposed amendment to the Countywide Plan; and WHEREAS, the City of Clearwater initiated a proposed amendment which was considered at a public hearing by Forward Pinellas, in its role as the Pinellas Planning Council, on April 11, 2018 with recommendations made by Forward Pinellas that are documented in the reports referred to as Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners in its capacity as the Countywide Planning Authority has conducted a public hearing and taken action that is documented by ordinance for approvals or partial approvals and partial denials and by resolution for denials, with both documents including the relevant Board reports as attached. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of Pinellas County, Florida, in its capacity as the Countywide Planning . Authority, in regular meeting duly assembled on May 8, 2018 as follows: Section 1. Amending the Countywide Plan Map The Countywide Plan Map for Pinellas County adopted in Section:2 of Ordinance 15-30, as amended, is amended to reflect the changes adopted as follows: #CW 18-08 0.1 acres m.o.l.,.located at 720 Tiskawilla Street, from Office (0) to Public/Semi- Public (P/SP). Section 2. Severability. If any Section, Subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or provision of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by a Court. of Competent Jurisdiction, such holding shall not be. construed to render the remaining provisions of this Ordinance invalid or unconstitutional. Section 3. Filing of Ordinance: Effective Date. A certified copy of this ordinance shall be filed with the Secretary of State with the Ordinance and Exhibit A to be filed with the Clerk of the Circuit Court. This Ordinance shall take effect upon filing with the Department of State. 2 FORM._ MELLAS P: (727) 464.8250 F: (727) 464.8212 forwardpinellas.org 310 Court Street Clearwater, R 33756 April 13, 2018 William Horne, City Manager City of Clearwater PO Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 RE: Case CW 18-08 — City of Clearwater April 11, 2018 Forward Pinellas Meeting Follow-up Dear Mr. Horne: Forward Pinellas, in its role as the Pinellas Planning Council (PPC), considered and recommended approval at public hearing the application indicated above from the City of Clearwater for amendment of the Countywide Plan Map. The Board of County Commissioners acting pursuant to its Countywide Planning Authority (CPA), will now conduct the final public hearing on May 8, 2018. Thank you and your staff for your assistance in the coordination of our countywide planning process. Sinc ely, Whit Blanton, AICP Executive Director Enclosure cc: Michael Delk, Planning Director Edward & James White Robert Ankanbauer INTEGRATING LAND USE & TRANSPORTATION April 11, 2018 FORWARD 6A3. Case CW 18-08 — City of Clearwater L , ' P I N E L LAS Imegialing land Use & lranswation SUMMARY From: Office To: Public/Semi-Public Area: 0.1 acres m.o.l. Location: 720 Tuskawilla Street This proposed amendment is submitted by the City of Clearwater and seeks to amend a property totaling approximately 0.1 acres from Office (used to depict areas that are developed, or appropriate to be developed, with office uses, low -impact employment uses, and residential uses (subject to an acreage threshold), in areas characterized by a transition between residential and commercial uses and in areas well-suited for community -scale residential/office mixed-use development) to Public/Semi-Public (intended to recognize institutional and transportation/utility uses that serve the community or region, especially larger facilities having acreage exceeding the thresholds established in other plan categories, and which are consistent with the need, character, and scale of such uses relative to the surrounding uses, transportation facilities, and natural resource features). This amendment qualifies as a Type A subthreshold amendment because it is less than five acres in size and meets the balancing criteria. The subject property is vacant. An accessory structure to the Veterans of Foreign Wars building, which is located adjacent to the lot property being amended, is being proposed for the site. If approved, this amendment will be consistent with the City of Clea►water's Comprehensive Plan. FINDINGS Staff submits the following findings in support of the recommendation for approval: A. The Public/Semi-Public category recognizes the proposed use of the site, and is consistent with the criteria for utilization of this category. B. The proposed amendment either does not involve, or will not significantly impact, the remaining relevant countywide considerations. Please see accompanying attachments and documents in explanation and support of these findings. LIST OF MAPS & ATTACHMENTS: Map 1 Locator Map Map 2 Site Map Map 3 Aerial Map Map 4 Current Countywide Plan Map Map 5 Proposed Countywide Plan Map MEETING DATES: Planners Advisory Committee, March 5, 2018 at 1:30 p.m. Forward Pinellas, April 11, 2018 at 1:00 p.m. Countywide Planning Authority, May 8, 2018 at 9:30 a.m. ACTION: Board, in its role as the Pinellas Planning Council, to recommend approval or denial of the requested amendment to the Countywide Planning Authority. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends to the board that it recommend approval of the requested amendment. ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: At its March 5, 2018 meeting, the Planners Advisory Committee voted 13-0 to accept this map adjustment. FORWARD PINELLAS BOARD RECOMMENDATION: The Board met on April 11, 2018 and voted 12- 0 to recommend approval of this amendment.