Loading...
REZ2017-100110 12C! TUSKAWILLA ST EZ2017-10011 { _�CLEARWATER 1 w post 10304 BRIGHT AND BEAUTIFUL• BAY TO BEACH p - Zoning Zoning: Office Atlas #: 305B ALL APPLICATIONS ARE TO BE FILLED OUT COMPLETELY AND CORRECTLY, AND SUBMITTED IN PERSON (NO FAX OR DELIVERIES) TO THE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY NOON ON THE SCHEDULED DEADLINE DATE. ONE (1) COMPLETE SET OF APPLICATION MATERIALS AS REQUIRED WITHIN IS -TO BE SUBMITTED DIGITALLY (COMBINED INTO A SINGLE PDF FILE ONTO A CD/DVD/USB DRIVE) FOR REVIEW BY THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE. SUBSEQUENT SUBMITTAL FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD WILL REQUIRE 11 COMPLETE SETS OF APPLICATION MATERIALS PRINTED (1 ORIGINAL AND 10 COPIES) AND ONE (1) COMBINED DIGITAL COPY IN A MANNER CONSISTENT WITH THE ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL. PLANS AND APPLICATIONS ARE REQUIRED TO BE COLLATED, STAPLED AND FOLDED INTO SETS. IT IS INCUMBENT UPON THE APPLICANT TO SUBMIT COMPLETE AND CORRECT INFORMATION. ANY MISLEADING, DECEPTIVE, INCOMPLETE OR INCORRECT INFORMATION MAY INVALIDATE YOUR APPLICATION. THE APPLICANT, BY FILING THIS APPLICATION, AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE. APPLICATION FEE: $775 Rezoning Only $0 If submitted concurrently with corresponding Future Land Use Map Amendment (FLUM Amendment fee inclusive of rezoning) PROPERTY OWNER(S) Edward And James White VFW Post 10304 (PER DEED): MAILING ADDRESS: 724 Tuskawilla St. 727-953-9295 EMAIL: rankenbauer@tampabay.rr.com AGENT OR REPRESENTATIVE: Robert Ankenbauer MAILING ADDRESS: 132 19th St. SE Largo FI. 33771 PHONE NUMBER: 727-686-5524 EMAIL: rankenbauer@tampabay.rr.com ADDRESS OF SUBJECT 720 Tuskawilla St. PROPERTY (if applicable): PARCEL NUMBER(S): 21-29-15-58068-016-0130 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Milton Park Blk 16 Lot 13 REASON FOR REQUESTED Change of Zoning to rr-nS-r,+„ t','o'/ -Vt. ; rtewt- L.;i4t fi C.st x-e.ys � AMENDMENT: Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567 Page 1 of 6 Revised 10/16 .' _�CLEARWATER `' 7flRICHT AND flFl�UTIRIL�BAY TC7 flFi�CH `` Planning & Development Department Zoning Atlas Amendment Application PLEASE ENSURE THAT THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS FILLED OUT, IN ITS ENTIRETY. FAILURE TO COMPLETE THIS FORM WILL RESULT IN YOUR APPLICATION BEING FOUND INCOMPLETE AND POSSIBLY DEFERRED UNTIL THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION CYCLE. FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATION PRESENT: Residential/Office General REQUESTED: Institutional ZONING DISTRICT Office REQUESTED: Institutional SITE AREA: 6325 sq. ft. 0.145 acres MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE DENSITY/INTENSITY(S) : USE(S): Current/Existing ® i% �AR0.50 Existing (currently on site Office Future Land Use(s): or previous use if vacant P )� � Proposed Future Lan�AR0.65 Proposed (new use, if any; Community Center Use(s) (if applicable). plus existing if to remain): (units, rooms or beds per acre or non- residential square footage) ZONING DISTRICTS FOR ALL ADJACENT PROPERTY: North: Office Institutional Institutional/Office Office South East: West: STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application Sworn to and subscribed before me this / y day of 1,r-��j �j�r / to me and/or by RobAn k�/7 bJff _ , who is personally known has produced � ✓erS %6L/IJI0' as identification. Signature of property owner or representative ,elm NotaryPuDlfcStateofFbrida Notary public, �� o�� �F ��'��0� M commission ex fires: M Commission FF 848598 y p ap pins 12/29/2018 Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567 Page 2 of 6 Revised 10/16 Planning & Development Department CLEARWAFLR Zoning Atlas Amendment Application BRIGHT AND BEAITI'BVL-BAY TD BEACH Submittal Package Checklist IN ADDITION TO THE COMPLETED ZONING ATLAS AMENDMENT APPLICATION, ALL ZONING ATLAS AMENDMENT APPLICATIONS SHALL INCLUDE A SUBMITTAL PACKAGE THAT INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING: ❑ Proof of ownership (e.g., copy of deed, title insurance policy, or other instrument demonstrating ownership) ❑ Legal description of the property. If the property is not a platted lot of record, a current boundary survey prepared, signed and sealed by a land surveyor currently registered in the State of Florida is required. ❑ A copy of deed restrictions applicable to the property to which the City is a party. ❑ Information demonstrating that the proposed amendment complies with the criteria set forth in Section 4-602.F. The attached Zoning Atlas Amendment Standards for Review sheet shall be used to provide these responses. ❑ Note: Any request for Zoning Atlas amendment which is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map designation must be accompanied by an Application for a Future Land Use Map Amendment (separate application). ❑ A Traffic Impact Study is not required as part of the application for an amendment to the Zoning Atlas (REZ). A Traffic Impact Study may be provided at the applicant's discretion to supplement the assessment of the impact of the proposed change on the adequacy of public facilities (existing roadways). A Traffic Impact Study may be required at the time a site plan is submitted for development review if the total generated net new trips generated by the proposed development meet one or more conditions outlined on the appropriate application. ❑ PUBLIC HEARING ATTENDANCE: The applicant or applicant's agent is advised to attend all public hearings scheduled for the proposed amendment including public hearings before the Community Development Board and City Council. Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567 Page 3 of 6 Revised 10/16 Planning & Development Department 'CLEARWATER Zoning Atlas Amendment / BRIGHT AND HFAUTIFUL•BAY 706EACH Standards for Review PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO EACH OF THE SIX (6) STANDARDS FOR REVIEW EXPLAINING HOW, IN DETAIL, THE CRITERION IS BEING COMPLIED WITH PER THIS ZONING ATLAS AMENDMENT. 1. The proposed amendment is consistent with and furthers the goals, policies and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan and furthers the purposes of the Community Development Code and other City ordinances and actions designed to implement the Plan. The proposed amendment will further implementation of the comprehensive plan consistent with the goals, objectives and policies contained Within the plan. The proposed amendment is specifically consistent with Goal A.4 and Objective A.6.2 of the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The available uses to which the property may be put are appropriate to the property which is subject to the proposed amendment and compatible with existing and planned uses in the area. The intent of the Institutional zoning district is to establish areas where public and private organizations can establish and operate Institutions with a public interest without adversely impacting the integrity of adjacent neighborhoods. The proposed Institutional zoning district Is compatible with existing and proposed uses in the area. 3. The amendment does not conflict with the needs and character of the neighborhood and city. The proposed amendment does not conflict with the needs and character of the surrounding neighborhood and/or the City. 4. The amendment will not adversely or unreasonably affect the use of other property in the area. The proposed amendment will not adversely or unreasonably affect use of other properties in the area. The VFW has existed at this location Since 1976. 5. The amendment will not adversely burden public facilities, including the traffic -carrying capacities of streets, in an unreasonably or disproportionate manner. The proposed amendment will not in and of itself adversely burden public facilities, and/or traffic carrying capacities of streets in an Unreasonable or disproportionate manner. 6. The district boundaries are appropriately drawn with due regard to the locations and classifications of streets, ownership lines, existing improvements and the natural environment. The district boundaries are appropriately drawn. Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567 Page 4 of 6 Revised 10/16 Planning & Development Department --- Zoning Atlas Amendment C L E A Ft'�f+JA BRIGHT AND BEAUTIFUL• BAY TO BEACH Affidavit to Authorize Agent/Representative 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed —PRINT full names: Edward and James White VFW Post 10304 2. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property: Edward and James White VFW Post 10304 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for (describe request): Yes 4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: Robert Ankenbauer as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. That (1/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true d correct. C Robert Ankenbauer _ - 14 Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS BEFOREMETHE UNDERSIGNED, AN OFFICER DULY COMMISSIONED BY THE LAWSOFTHE STATE OF FLORIDA, ON THIS / DAY OF © C 7 O be% , ' `/ (/ 7. PERSONALLY APPEARED kellb 0 lef- WHO HAVING BEEN FIRST DULY SWORN DEPOSED AND SAYS THAT HE/SHE FULLY UNDERSTANDS THE CONTENTS OF THE AFFIDAVIT THAT HE/SHE SIGNED. � " Notary Public Stell of Flofte • Sean Ambrose Notary Public Signature 11' My Commission is 848588 My Commission ���X �! M tatplres f ti29/2018 Notary Seal/Sta Expires: Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567 Page 5 of 6 Revised 10/16 ' u.,,tRWX; BIUGIkTWO SEJtL7'0'1FIJI.-BAY TO, MAC 14 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: CASE: REQUEST: RECOMMENDATION: GENERAL DATA: Applicant ......................... Owner ............................. Location .......................... Property Size ................. Background: December 19, 2017 H.2. REZ2017-10011 To amend the Zoning Atlas designation from Office (0) District to Institutional (I) District Approval Robert Ankenbauer Edward and James White VFW Posts 10304 720 Tuskawilla Street, located on the north side of Tuskawilla Street approximately 90 feet west of South Myrtle Avenue 0.145 -acre portion of a 0.288 -acre parcel This case involves 0.145 acres of a 0.288 -acre parcel located on the north side of Tuskawilla Street approximately 90 feet west of South Myrtle Avenue. The parcel, owned by Edward and James White Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFW) Post 10304 is comprised of two lots (Lots 13 and 14). The VFW has been located at the intersection of Tuskawilla Street and South Myrtle Avenue since 1976, and purchased the subject property (Lot 13) in 2003. The VFW utilizes a 644 square foot building located on Lot 14, and recently demolished a building that occupied Lot 13. As a result of the previous property acquisition, the parcel currently has two future land use designations: Institutional (I) on Lot 14 recognizing the VFW's social club use, and Residential/Office General (R/OG) on Lot 13, the proposed amendment area. Maps 1 and 2 show the general location of the property and an aerial view of the amendment area. The request is to change the Zoning Atlas designation of the proposed amendment area (Lot 13) from Office (0) to Institutional (I), thereby making the entire parcel a consistent zoning designation. A request to amend the future land use category of the proposed amendment area from the Residential/Office General (R/OG) category to the Institutional (I) category is being processed concurrently with this case (see LUP2017- 10010). The VFW has indicated it would like to expand, adding an accessory structure on the site; however, no site plan has been submitted at this time. Lc:d III /omnc 91In* \mo,,,4�io�l kc��_+. Map 1 Vicinity Characteristics: PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT LONG RANGE PLANNING DIVISION Map 3 shows the existing surrounding uses. The site is largely surrounded by offices, which are located to the west, north and east of the site, across South Myrtle Avenue. In addition, there are two single family homes and a vehicle service use to the west. To the south and southeast is the Clearwater Municipal Cemetery. i f 21 1 W _ _' _ _ _ _ _ 1 _ 1 > a_ 1911 8' T' a 5 1233 123$1 Off"WeS _ _ J �A3MWt W. 14 - MAGNOLIA OR i, ' 13 �i a I'�a ih 1 1 1 LOTUS PATH -Wi ii - 1 - V W GRAND y JL'r�l/HUS - '.¢ PROJECT CENTRAL ST ti SITE LOTUS PATH .�i �'411D4 .SI M1 � ti PlNELLAS ST hlHELLAS 1 ' , ._ S � PINEL�AS.ST 1 � Z � 1pQh WILLAST W i_--_�:5 q s.�..'WHEVIEYY RD 1 { SST St _ q + vo - TUSKAWILLAST $ T i1 1 $ NSKAWILLA ST L ,Cemetery .4� 1 '2 Nallill i 1 t cmcten jib O wu. qp WAY II 1 3 1 L2'1 34�j' I I 1 I 1 LOCATION MAP Map 1 Vicinity Characteristics: PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT LONG RANGE PLANNING DIVISION Map 3 shows the existing surrounding uses. The site is largely surrounded by offices, which are located to the west, north and east of the site, across South Myrtle Avenue. In addition, there are two single family homes and a vehicle service use to the west. To the south and southeast is the Clearwater Municipal Cemetery. Map 3 Community Development Board — December 19, 2017 REZ2017-10011- Page 2 of 8 i f 21 1 W _ _' _ _ _ _ _ 1 _ 1 > a_ 1911 8' T' a 5 1233 123$1 Off"WeS _ _ J 113--+-- __ 1'710411 14 Q 6 1 9 1 L 11 1 12 _ I 13 1 14 t l 1 i, ' 13 �i a I'�a ih 1 1 1 g s I �� Oces 1 N sick ntb I I1 PlNELLAS ST 1 ' , ' lig. ffices g tz 7p nt 1 13 e4 (j 61 10 11 12 43 14 14 17 5 6 17 8 19 11 15 1 16 TUSKAWILLAST $ 1 m i1 1 $ NSKAWILLA ST ,Cemetery .4� 1 '2 I4, 3 1 2 1 1 i 1 t cmcten jib O II 1 3 1 L2'1 34�j' I I 1 I 1 1 l ! 1 f � n 1 a > 1, 3.8 A-:c EXISTING SURROUNDING USES MAP Map 3 Community Development Board — December 19, 2017 REZ2017-10011- Page 2 of 8 I-evel III Zoning Atlas Amendment Review PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT LONG RANGE PLANNING DMSION As shown on Map 5, the abutting Zoning Atlas designations are Office (0) and Institutional (1). The surrounding vicinity has areas designated Industrial, Research and Technology (IRT) to the west and northwest, and Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) farther east, across South Myrtle Avenue. f I I a^ 1 G_- 1I, 21 6 j ,11 7 6 5 4 1 3 1 1 r\r]] 12757,27 2_ 7 1i1 I10 5_A 4 1111 1111937 71,11 8 5 I _I-O p 239 F f a1 �3 _i T1 _6 _3 _2 _ _y__ 6 10 1 _8 _I,(11 _ > 1 1 1 13 14 1 , 6 , 3 10 11 12 Q _L, i 13 14 .806d to It _ 4 I 13471 15 '.6 t 121, 171 13 N 1 1 1 9 111 12 1 13 l4 1 I $ t1 12 t3 to 'S '6 m { 1 1 _J I 1 12491 1251 1 , Ia O ml 1 2 1 1 1-_ PINELLAS ST W/06 1 n 7 I @ 6 5 3 2 I /y7 i `� 9 8 f 5 3 Il T ''J 2_: 1 _I _ PINELLAS ST �� 9 1 a 9 2 1 8 $B 0 m 125 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 1 13 �4 iT �1 i V 8 I B 10 1;112 13 14 g if� 3 14 a 17 F 19 14 15 1 lb '1 13 �4 li 1 6 1 9 10 11 t2 +3 t4 V 1 o o m 1112 14 51617 I9 14 151 16 , 11 -�L D 0 21m1 I I U 1 ti •I ___ 9 w i 21.1 i 1 1� TUSKAWILLA ST . 1 i P° TUS .ST I pe ,� I I 1 I , TUSKAWlLLA ST '�, 2) , I I ._, T 2 1 1 8 1 7 I 6 1 5 1 a 1 3 1 2 1 1 2 / 1 1 8 1 7 1$ 5 1 4, 3 1 2 1 1 Z 9 11 10 1 11 1 12 ' x1134 1 / 4 , 9 11 10 1 it 1 12 91134 B , 1 I 1 3.8 Ac1q I 1 i 1 38 Acm, FUTURE LAND USE MAP ZONING MAP Map 4 REVIEW CRITERIA: Map 5 Consistency with the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan and Community Development Code and Regulations [Sections 4-602.F.11 Recommended Findings of Fact: Applicable goals and objectives of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan which support the proposed amendment include: Goal A.2 A sufficient variety and amount of future land use categories shall be provided to accommodate public demand and promote infill development. Goal A.4. The City shall work toward a land use pattern that can be supported by the available community and public facilities that would be required to serve the development. Objective A.4.1 The City's Concurrency Management System will ensure that compatibility of all proposed development with the capacities of the existing and planned support facilities for which a level of service has been adopted. Community Development Board — December 19, 2017 REZ2017-10011- Page 3 of 8 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT Level III Zoning Adas Amendment Review LONG RANGE PLANNING DIVISION Objective A.6.4 Due to the built -out character of the city of Clearwater, compact urban development within the urban service area shall be promoted through application of the Clearwater Community Development Code. Applicable section of the Community Development Code which supports the proposed amendment: Division 12. Institutional District, Section 2-1201. Intent and Purpose. The intent and purpose of the Institutional "I" District is to establish areas where public and private organizations can establish and operate institutions with a public interest in support of the quality of life of the citizens of the City of Clearwater without adversely impacting the integrity of adjacent residential neighborhoods, diminishing the scenic quality of the City of Clearwater or negatively impacting the safe and efficient movement of people and things within the City of Clearwater. The VFW is already located on the parcel, but the Zoning Atlas amendment is required to allow it to expand and/or add accessory structures as indicated is desired by the applicant. The proposed Institutional (I) District is compatible with the surrounding office and vehicle services uses in addition to the single family residential neighborhoods and cemetery. In addition, the proposal does not degrade the level of service for public facilities below the adopted standards (a detailed public facilities analysis follows in this report). Recommended Conclusions of Law: The request does not conflict with the goals, objectives and policies of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan and furthers said plan and the Community Development Code as indicated above. Compatibility with Surrounding Property/Character of the City & Neighborhood [Section 4-602.F.2, 4-602.F.3 and Section 4-602.F.41 Recommended Findings of Fact: Existing surrounding uses consist of offices (east and north), cemetery (south and southeast), vehicle services (west) and two single family homes (west). The proposed use of the subject property as a social club (currently developed as such) is compatible with the surrounding properties and neighborhood. The proposed Institutional (1) zoning district is consistent with the surrounding zoning districts that exist in the vicinity of the subject property. The proposed amendment will allow the existing VFW to potentially expand in the future, and the use will remain consistent and in character with the surrounding properties and neighborhood. Recommended Conclusions of Law: The proposed Office (0) zoning district is in character with the zoning districts in the area. Further, the proposal is compatible with surrounding uses and consistent with the character of the surrounding properties and neighborhood. Community Development Board — December 19, 2017 REZ201.7-10011- Page 4 of 8 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT Level In Zoning Atlas Amendment Review LONG RANGE PLANNING DIVISION Sufficiency of Public Facilities [Section 4-602.F.51 Recommended Findings of Fact: To assess the sufficiency of public facilities needed to support potential development on the proposed amendment area, the maximum development potential of the property under the present and requested City Future Land Use Map designations were analyzed (see Table 1). Even though this is a Zoning Atlas amendment application, maximum development potential is based on the underlying future land use, so for purposes of this analysis sufficiency of public facilities is based on the future land use map designation. Table 1. Development Potential for Existing & Proposed FL UM Designations As shown in the table, there is an increase in nonresidential development potential across the amendment area which would increase demand on most public facilities, but would not degrade them below acceptable levels as detailed below. The following analysis compares the maximum potential development of the proposed Institutional (I) future land use developed with a social club use (4,105 square feet) to the maximum development potential of the existing Residential/Office General (R/OG) future land use category developed with an office use (3,158 square feet). An increase in demand of the public facilities could be expected if the VFW expands; however, there is adequate capacity to serve the property. Potable Water The increase in development potential from this amendment would result in an increase in potable water use of 95.5 gallons per day. This is determined by comparing the potential potable water utilization of the maximum square footage allowed by the proposed land use developed with a social club use (410 gallons per day) to the potential utilization of an office built out to the maximum square footage allowed by the current land use designation (315 gallons per day). Wastewater The increase in development potential from this amendment would also result in an increase in wastewater production of 76 gallons per day. This is determined by comparing the potential wastewater generation of the proposed land use developed with a social club use (328 gallons) to the potential wastewater generation of the current land use designation developed with an office use (252 gallons). Community Development Board — December 19, 2017 REZ2017-10011- Page 5 of 8 ' Net Change 1 I 0.145 AC 0.145 AC Site Area (6,316 SF) (6,316 SF) Maximum 2 DUs 0 DUs -2 DUs Development 3,158 SF 4,105 SF 947 SF Potential 0.50 FAR 0.65 FAR 0.15 FAR Notes: 1. Residential uses not permitted through consistent Institutional (I) District Abbreviations: FLUM — Future Land Use Map DUs — Dwelling Units AC — Acres FAR — Floor Area Ratio SF — Square feet As shown in the table, there is an increase in nonresidential development potential across the amendment area which would increase demand on most public facilities, but would not degrade them below acceptable levels as detailed below. The following analysis compares the maximum potential development of the proposed Institutional (I) future land use developed with a social club use (4,105 square feet) to the maximum development potential of the existing Residential/Office General (R/OG) future land use category developed with an office use (3,158 square feet). An increase in demand of the public facilities could be expected if the VFW expands; however, there is adequate capacity to serve the property. Potable Water The increase in development potential from this amendment would result in an increase in potable water use of 95.5 gallons per day. This is determined by comparing the potential potable water utilization of the maximum square footage allowed by the proposed land use developed with a social club use (410 gallons per day) to the potential utilization of an office built out to the maximum square footage allowed by the current land use designation (315 gallons per day). Wastewater The increase in development potential from this amendment would also result in an increase in wastewater production of 76 gallons per day. This is determined by comparing the potential wastewater generation of the proposed land use developed with a social club use (328 gallons) to the potential wastewater generation of the current land use designation developed with an office use (252 gallons). Community Development Board — December 19, 2017 REZ2017-10011- Page 5 of 8 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT Level III Zoning Atlas Amendment Review LONG RANGE PLANNING DIVISION Solid Waste The proposed amendment could result in an increase of 15.7 tons per year of solid waste generated when comparing the amount of waste generated by a social club use to that of an office use. All solid waste disposal is handled by Pinellas County at the Pinellas County Waste -to -Energy Plant and the Bridgeway Acres Sanitary Landfill which has significant capacity. Additionally, the City provides a full-service citywide recycling program which diverts waste from the landfill, helping to extend the lifespan of Bridgeway Acres. There is excess solid waste capacity to serve the amendment area. Parkland The City's adopted LOS for parkland acreage, which is 4 acres per 1,000 population, will not be impacted by this proposed amendment. Under both the existing and proposed land use, the LOS citywide will remain at 15.46 acres per 1,000 population. Stormwater Site plan approval will be required before the property can be redeveloped. At that time, the stormwater management system for the site will be required to meet all City and SWFWMD stormwater management criteria. Streets The subject property is located on the north side of Tuskawilla Street approximately 90 feet west of South Myrtle Avenue. To evaluate potential impacts to streets, the typical traffic impacts figure (trips per day per acre) in the Countywide Rules for the corresponding Countywide Plan Map categories (current and proposed) are compared. The current number of trips per day (12 trips) is calculated based on the typical traffic generation numbers for the Office (0) category (89 trips per day per acre). The proposed Countywide Plan Map category of Public/Semi-Public (P/SP) (67 trips per day per acre) would decrease the amount of trips per day to 9 trips per day. This is a decrease of 3 trips per day compared to the number of trips under the current designation. Recommended Conclusions of Law: Based upon the findings of fact, it is determined that the proposed change will not result in the degradation of the existing levels of service for potable water, sanitary sewer, solid waste, parkland, stormwater management and streets. Community Development Board — December 19, 2017 REZ2017-10011- Page 6 of 8 Level III Zoning Atlas Amendment Review PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT LONG RANGE PLANNING DIVISION Location of District Boundaries [Section 4-602.F.61 Recommended Findings of Fact: The location of the proposed Institutional (I) District is logical and consistent with the boundaries of the subject property (Lot 13). Recommended Conclusions of Law: The District boundaries are appropriately drawn in regard to location and classifications of streets, ownership lines, existing improvements and the natural environment. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: No amendment to the Zoning Atlas shall be recommended for approval or receive a final action of approval unless it complies with the standards contained in Section 4-602.F, Community Development Code. Table 2 below depicts the consistency of the proposed amendment with the standards pursuant to Section 4-602.F: Table 2. Consistency with Community Development Code Standards for Review FA The proposed amendment is consistent with and features X the goals, policies and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan and furthers the purposes of this Development Code and other city ordinances and actions designed to implement the plan. F.2 The available uses to which the property may be put are X appropriate to the property which is subject to the proposed amendment and compatible with existing and planned uses in the area. F.3 The amendment does not conflict with the needs and X character of the neighborhood and the city. FA The amendment will not adversely or unreasonably affect X the use of other property in the area. F.5 The amendment will not adversely burden public X facilities, including the traffic -carrying capacities of streets, in an unreasonably or disproportionate manner. F.6 The district boundaries are appropriately drawn with due X regard to locations and classifications of streets, ownership lines, existing improvements and the natural environment. Community Development Board — December 19, 2017 REZ2017-10011- Page 7 of 8 Level III Zoning Atlas Amendment Review PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT LONG RANGE PLANNING DIVISION Based on the foregoing, the Planning and Development Department recommends the following action: Recommend APPROVAL of the Zoning Atlas amendment from Office (0) District to Institutional (I) District. Prepared by Planning and Development Department Staff: Kyle Brotherton Senior Planner ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance No. 9098-18 Resume Photographs of Site and Vicinity Community Development Board — December 19, 2017 REZ2017-10011- Page 8 of 8 rPlanning & Development Department �CLEARWATER Zoning Atlas Amendment J BRIGHT AND BEAU7TFUL • BAY TO BEACH / Standards for Review PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO EACH OF THE SIX (6) STANDARDS FOR REVIEW EXPLAINING HOW, IN DETAIL, THE CRITERION IS BEING COMPLIED WITH PER THIS ZONING ATLAS AMENDMENT. 1. The proposed amendment is consistent with and furthers the goals, policies and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan and furthers the purposes of the Community Development Code and other City ordinances and actions designed to implement the Plan. Yes/Change to Institional/Storage 2. The available uses to which the property may be put are appropriate to the property which is subject to the proposed amendment and compatible with existing and planned uses in the area. Yes 3. The amendment does not conflict with the needs and character of the neighborhood and city. Yes 4. The amendment will not adversely or unreasonably affect the use of other property in the area. Correct 5. The amendment will not adversely burden public facilities, including the traffic -carrying capacities of streets, in an unreasonably or disproportionate manner. Correct 6. The district boundaries are appropriately drawn with due regard to the locations and classifications of streets, ownership lines, existing improvements and the natural environment. Correct Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567 Page 4 of 6 Revised 10/16 �CLEARWATER ��BRICHT AND BEAVTFULBAY'N BEACN /// Planning & Development Department Zoning Atlas Amendment Application PLEASE ENSURE THAT THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS FILLED OUT, IN ITS ENTIRETY. FAILURE TO COMPLETE THIS FORM WILL RESULT IN YOUR APPLICATION BEING FOUND INCOMPLETE AND POSSIBLY DEFERRED UNTIL THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION CYCLE. FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATION PRESENT: Office REQUESTED: Institutional/Storage ZONING DISTRICT Office REQUESTED: Institutional/Storage SITE AREA: 6325 sq. ft. 0.145 acres MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE DENSITY/INTENSITY(S) : USE(S): Current/Existing Office Existing (currently on site Office Future Land Use(s): previous use if vacant or p ): Proposed Future Land Institutional Proposed (new use, if any; Institutional/Stora e g Use(s) (if applicable): plus existing if to remain): (units, rooms or beds per acre or non- residential square footage) ZONING DISTRICTS FOR ALL ADJACENT PROPERTY: North: Office South: Institutional East: Institutional/Office West: Office STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. Sworn to and rtsubscribed before me this �I day of ,� / 1 to me and/or by b--Mu'r'/�w who is personally known has produced a= 0�_ 1 as identification. Signature of property owner or representative rtm N LAUREN LtVOSER Notarypu ic, My WmmISSION i FF 918951 1�% (�R / n tNt a Novernber 2 2019 My commission expires: ' Bonded Thiu Notary Public UrdenRlters Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567 Page 2 of 6 Revised 10/16 Planning & Development Department �CLEARWATER Comprehensive Plan Amendment �' � awcKr nxn ee�uleuc-air ro seacH Standards for Review PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO EACH OF THE SIX (6) STANDARDS FOR REVIEW EXPLAINING HOW, IN DETAIL, THE CRITERION IS BEING COMPLIED WITH PER THIS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT. 1. The amendment will further implementation of the comprehensive plan consistent with the goals, policies and objectives contained in the plan. Land use on'h of parcel so the complete parcel is consistent with the use of the property which is the VFW This is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The amendment is not inconsistent with other provisions of the comprehensive plan. The amendment is necessary to allow for an a to existing institutional use to expand slightly by Adding storage and that nothing would be inconstant with the plan. 3. The available uses, if applicable, to which the property may be put are appropriate to the property in question and compatible with existing and planned uses in the area. The VFW have been located on the parcel located at Myrtle Ave. and Tuskawilla since 1976 and about 1985 it bought the additional land for storage. Since that time the VFW has determined it needs additional storage space and would like tp have a building on the property. This would be an accessory to the VFW which wants to remain in this area. The VFW is compatible with other properties in the area 4. Sufficient public facilities are available to serve the property. The public will not have access to the building. 5. The amendment will not adversely affect the natural environment. Correct 6. The amendment will not adversely impact the use of property in the immediate area. Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 4 of 7 Revised 10/05/2016 r.nrrim rt Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 5 of 7 Revised 10/05/2016 -Planning &Development Department BRIGHT AND BEAUTTNL� BAY 7+D BGCti CLEARWATER Comprehensive Plan Amendment Standards for Review PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO EACH OF THE SIX (6) STANDARDS FOR REVIEW EXPLAINING HOW, IN DETAIL, THE CRITERION IS BEING COMPLIED WITH PER THIS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT. 1. The amendment will further implementation of the comprehensive plan consistent with the goals, policies and objectives contained in the plan. Consistent with goal A.4 objective A.6.2 2. The amendment is not inconsistent with other provisions of the comprehensive plan. Is not inconsistent with the other provisions of the plan 3. The available uses, if applicable, to which the property may be put are appropriate to the property in question and compatible with existing and planned uses in the area. The VFW have been located on the parcel located at Myrtle Ave. and Tuskawilla since 1976 and about 1985 it bought the additional land for storage. Since that time the VFW has determined it needs additional storage space and would like tp have a building on the property. This would be an accessory to the VFW which wants to remain in this area. The VFW is compatible with other properties in the area 4. Sufficient public facilities are available to serve the property. Public facility's are available . 5. The amendment will not adversely affect the natural environment. Not affective 6. The amendment will not adversely impact the use of property in the immediate area. Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 4 of 7 Revised 10/05/2016 The VFW has been at that location since 1976 and the proposed amendment will not adversely affect the nearby properties Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Revised 10/05/20`16865 Page 5 of 7 )CLEARWATER Planning & Development Department BEACH onBZing Atlas Amendment �JBWGHT AND EAUTIFUL•BAY TO Standards for Review PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO EACH OF THE SIX (6) STANDARDS FOR REVIEW EXPLAINING HOW, IN DETAIL, THE CRITERION IS BEING COMPLIED WITH PER THIS ZONING ATLAS AMENDMENT. 1. The proposed amendment is consistent with and furthers the goals, policies and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan and furthers the purposes of the Community Development Code and other City ordinances and actions designed to implement the Plan. Consistent with goal AA objective A.6.2 2. The available uses to which the property may be put are appropriate to the property which is subject to the proposed amendment and compatible with existing and planned uses in the area. Proposed Institution District is compatible with existing land use for the area 3. The amendment does not conflict with the needs and character of the neighborhood and city. The proposed amendment does not conflict with the needs and character of the surrounding neighborhood 4. The amendment will not adversely or unreasonably affect the use of other property in the area. The proposed amendment will not unreasonable affect use of other properties in the area 5. The amendment will not adversely burden public facilities, including the traffic -carrying capacities of streets, in an unreasonably or disproportionate manner. The proposed amendment will not adversely affect public facilities and traffic in the area t 6. The district boundaries are appropriately drawn with due regard to the locations and classifications of streets, ownership lines, existing improvements and the natural environment. The district is a properly drawn Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567 Revised 10/16 Page 4 of 6 Planning & Development Department `- � -E rtZoning Atlas Amendment BRIGHT )OM BSAUTIRX-BAY TO BEACH Affidavit to Authorize Agent/Representative 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed —PRINT full names: Edward and James White VFW Post 10304 2. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property: Edward and James White VFW Post 10304 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for (describe request): Yes 4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: Robert Ankenbauer as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. That (1/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. Robert Ankenbauer Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Property Owner BEFORE ME THE UNDERSIGNED, AN OFFICER DULY COMMISSIONED f OrMMISSIONED BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, ON THIS DAY OF "�`i-�I P-- i I PERSONALLY APPEARED V u 1 XnKLl WHO HAVING BEEN FIRST DULY SWORN DEPOSED AND SAYS THAT HE/SHE FULLY UNDERSTANDS THE CONTENTS OF THE AFFIDAVIT THAT HE/SHE SIGNED. LAUREN M.' EISER ALW� �. MYCOMMISSIONiFF 1 Notary Public Signature EXPIRES: November 2, 2019 Y g .�...... aw*dThruNoWyPuMUrderwftrs My Commission Notary Seal/Sta Expires: Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567 Page 6 of 6 Revised 10/16