The URL can be used to link to this page

LUP2017-09008t(-(PeOl7-0 1006 1528 LAKEVIEW RD LUP2017-09008 CLEARViiIM x,AR Comprehensive P1j Spare Investor Include .)' Zoning: High Density Residential Atlas #: 307A ` - -- - J ALL APPLICATIONS ARE TO BE FILLED OUT COMPLETELY AND CORRECTLY, AND SUBMITTED IN PERSON (NO FAX OR DELIVERIES) TO THE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY NOON ON THE SCHEDULED DEADLINE DATE. ONE (1) COMPLETE SET OF APPLICATION MATERIALS AS REQUIRED WITHIN IS TO BE SUBMITTED DIGITALLY (COMBINED INTO A SINGLE PDF FILE ONTO A CD/DVD/USB DRIVE) FOR REVIEW BY THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE. SUBSEQUENT SUBMITTAL FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD WILL REQUIRE 11 COMPLETE SETS OF APPLICATION MATERIALS PRINTED (1 ORIGINAL AND 10 COPIES) AND ONE (1) COMBINED DIGITAL COPY IN A MANNER CONSISTENT WITH THE ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL. PLANS AND APPLICATIONS ARE REQUIRED TO BE COLLATED, STAPLED AND FOLDED INTO SETS. IT IS INCUMBENT UPON THE APPLICANT TO SUBMIT COMPLETE AND CORRECT INFORMATION. ANY MISLEADING, DECEPTIVE, INCOMPLETE OR INCORRECT INFORMATION MAY INVALIDATE YOUR APPLICATION. THE APPLICANT, BY FILING THIS APPLICATION, AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE. APPLICATION FEE: $885 Future Land Use Map Amendment only, includes Zoning Atlas Amendment $0 Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment APPLICATION TO AMEND: X FUTURE LAND USE MAP (select one) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (TEXT) PROPERTY OWNER (PER DEED): Spare Investors Realty, LLC MAILING ADDRESS: 5900 98th Avenue North Pinellas Park FL 33782 PHONE NUMBER: 727-560-8916 EMAIL: tjerger@jergerllc.com AGENT OR REPRESENTATIVE: Crai¢ A. Taraszki, Esu. MAILING ADDRESS: Johnson Pope, 333 3rd Ave N. Suite 200, St. Petersburg, FL 33701 PHONE NUMBER: 727-800-5980 EMAIL: craigt@jpfirm.com ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY (if applicable): 1528 Lakeview Road Clearwater FL PARCEL NUMBER(S): 23-29-15-00000-210-0400 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: see attached Exhibit "A" DESCRIPTION OF TEXT N/A AMENDMENT (if applicable): Specifically identify the requested amendment to the Comprehensive Pian Planning a Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, TO 737-562-4567 Page 1 of 5 Revised 1 010 5/2 01 6 Planning & Development Department ,A Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application Including Future Land Use Map Amendments PLEASE ENSURE THAT THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS FILLED OUT, IN ITS ENTIRETY. FAILURE TO COMPLETE THIS FORM WILL RESULT IN YOUR APPLICATION BEING FOUND INCOMPLETE AND POSSIBLY DEFERRED UNTIL THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION CYCLE. FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATION PRESENT: Residential High (RH) Residential Low (RL) REQUESTED: Residential/Office General (R/OG) COUNTYWIDE PLAN MAP CATEGORY PRESENT: Residential High; Residential Low Medium SITE AREA: REQUESTED: Office ZONING DISTRICT PRESENT: High Density Residential (HDR); Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) REQUESTED: Office (0) 58,029 sq. ft. MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE DENSITY/INTENSITY(S) Current/Existing RH: 30 du/ac; 0.6 FAR Future Land Use(s): RL: 5 du/ac; 0.4 FAR Proposed Future R/OG: 15 du/ac; Land Use(s): 0.5 FAR (units, rooms or beds per acre or non- residential square footage) 1.332 acres USE(S): Existing (currently on site or previous use if vacant): medical clinic/office Proposed (new use, if any; plus existing if to remain): medical clinic/office FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATIONS FOR ALL ADJACENT PROPERTY: North: Residential High (RH) South: Residential/Office General (R/OG) & Residential Low (RL) East: Residential Low (RL) West: Residential High (RH) STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. Sworn to and subscribed before me this 16th day of October 2017 to me and/or by cvzmc� who is personally known has produced ALA= as identification. Signature of property owner okQresentative LESLEY K REYNOLDS Nota p i, `a = Commission Il GG 133567 :,• :.: fission expires: 1swu My FIM kisism Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater. FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567 Paye 2 of 6 Revised 10/06/2016 Planning & Development Department .A CLEAR ATER Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application ncErt rmawt.•nrnua mxwat Submittal Package Checklist IN ADDITION TO THE COMPLETED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION, ALL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATIONS SHALL INCLUDE A SUBMITTAL PACKAGE THAT INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING: Er'If the application is for an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map (LUP), in addition to the application, the applicant must also provide the following: Proof of ownership (e.g., copy o ee title insurance policy, or other instrument demonstrating ownership) ,.,_Legal description of the property. If the property is not a platted lot of record, a current boundary survey prepared, signed and sealed by a land surveyor currently registered in the State of Florida is required. ,,,,Information demonstrating that the proposed amendment complies with the criteria set forth in Section 4-603.F. The attached Comprehensive Plan Amendment Standards for Review sheet shall be used to provide these responses. t:('An assessment of the impact of the proposed change on the adequacy of public facilities, the environment, community character, and the fiscal condition of the city. ❑ if the application is for an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan text (CPA), and does not affect an individual parcel of land, in addition to the application, the applicant must also provide the following: ❑ Data and analysis to support such an amendment under Florida Statutes. ❑ Information demonstrating that the proposed amendment complies with the criteria set forth in Section 4-603.F. The attached Comprehensive Plan Amendment Standards for Review sheet shall be used to provide these responses. ❑ A Traffic Impact Study is not required as part of the application for an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map (LUP). A Traffic Impact Study may be provided at the applicant's discretion to supplement the assessment of the impact of the proposed change on the adequacy of public facilities (existing roadways). A Traffic Impact Study may be required at the time a site plan is submitted for development review if the total generated net new trips generated by the proposed development meet one or more conditions outlined on the appropriate application. ❑ PUBLIC HEARING ATTENDANCE: The applicant or applicant's agent is advised to attend all public hearings scheduled for the proposed amendment including public hearings before the Community Development Board and City Council. Planning & Development Department,100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567 Page 3 of 5 Revised 10/05/2016 Planning & Development Department 10cLEARvvA-rEr Comprehensive Plan Amendment a�cxr�xoewnma 6Ar�oeru» __.____.___ _ _ _ Standards for Review PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO EACH OF THE SIX (6) STANDARDS FOR REVIEW EXPLAINING HOW, IN DETAIL, THE CRITERION IS BEING COMPLIED WITH PER THIS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT. 1. The amendment will further implementation of the comprehensive plan consistent with the goals, policies and objectives contained in the plan. See attached applicaton supplement. 2. The amendment is not inconsistent with other provisions of the comprehensive plan. See attached application supplement. 3. The available uses, if applicable, to which the property may be put are appropriate to the property in question and compatible with existing and planned uses in the area. See attached application supplement. 4. Sufficient public facilities are available to serve the property. See attached application supplement. 5. The amendment will not adversely affect the natural environment. See attached application supplement. 6. The amendment will not adversely impact the use of property in the immediate area. See attached application supplement. Planning & Development Dapprtmant, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, PL 33756, Tel= 727.302-490T Page 4 of 6 Revised 1 0105/2 01 6 1528 Lakeview Road — Spare Investors Realty, LLC Comprehensive Plan Amendment Standards for Review — Supplemental Responses 1. The amendment will further implementation of the comprehensive plan consistent with the goals, policies and objectives contained in the plans. Table A-1. The primary use of the existing Residential High FLU is high-density residential and residential equivalent uses. The primary use of the existing Residential Low FLU is low-density residential. The primary use of the proposed Residential/Office General FLU is otic?, medium - density residential and residential equivalent uses. The property was developed in 1985 under RM -38 zoning as a medical office building and that has been its primary use for the past 30+ years. This application is to conform the FLU and zoning designation to the historical development and uses of the property. A.2 Goal. A sufficient variety and amount of future land use categories shall be provided to accommodate public demand and promote infill development. A.2.2.13 Policy. All land use categories on the Future Land Use Map shall be consistent with the density and intensity standards and other standards contained in the Pinellas Planning Council Countywide Plan Rules, including criteria and standards for nomenclature, continuum of plan classifications and categories, use and locational characteristics, map delineation, other standards, and special rules. The proposed Residential/Office General FLU are consistent with the density and intensity standards and other standards for the proposed Office Countywide Plan Map category. The property currently has split FLU and Countywide Plan Map categories. A.5 Goal. The City of Clearwater shall identify and utilize a citywide design structure comprised of hierarchy of places and linkages. The citywide design structure will serve as a guide to development and land use decisions while protecting those elements that make the city uniquely Clearwater. A.5.1 Objective. Establish the Hierarchy of Places as shown on Map A-14. A.5.1.5 Policy. Identify Neighborhood Shopping Centers And Surrounding Non -Residential Uses: a limited number of commercial establishments that fulfill the basic needs of residents within one mile of the center. According to Map A-14, the northwest and northeast corners of Lakeview Road and S. Highland Avenue is designated as a neighborhood shopping center. The subject property is just east of this shopping center area, which is an appropriate location for uses allowable within the proposed R/OG FLU category and Office zoning. According to the Attachment to Map A-14, the hierarchy of places is: 1. Major Activity Centers 2. Destination Points 3. Multi -Neighborhood Shopping Centers and Surrounding Non -Residential Uses 4. Neighborhood Shopping Centers and Surrounding Non -Residential Uses S. Landmarks 1528 Lakeview Road — Spare Investors Realty, LLC Comprehensive Plan Amendment Standards for Review — Supplemental Responses 6. Neighborhood Character Features The proposed FLU map amendment and rezoning will not negatively impact any major activity centers, destination points or multi -neighborhood shopping centers. The historical office use over the past 30+ years is a complementary non-residential use to the neighborhood shopping center designated on the north side of the intersection of Lakeview Road and S. Highland Avenue, which can be utilized to provide services and employment opportunities for the nearby residential uses. A.5.5.1 Policy. Development should be designed to maintain and support the existing or envisioned character of the neighborhood. A.5.5.4 Policy. The transition between intensive redevelopment areas and adjacent low density areas should be sensitive to the scale of development in those low density areas. The existing character of the neighborhood is a transition from intense commercial and retail within the neighborhood shopping center designated on the north side of the intersection of Lakeview Road and S. Highland Avenue, to moderate intensity office uses on the south side of Lakeview Road, including a law office and dental office. The proposed Residential/Office General FLU is a reasonable transition from Commercial General and Residential High FLU to the west of the subject property and Residential Low FLU to the east. While there is an existing residential use immediately west of the subject property, it is a multi -family use. 2. The amendment is not inconsistent with other provisions of the comprehensive plan. The proposed Residential/Office General FLU designation is not inconsistent with other provisions of the comprehensive plan. While there can be conflicts between non-residential and residential uses, the requirements of the Community Development Code are intended to mitigate and minimize those conflicts. From the available evidence, it appears that the existing building constructed in 1985 under RM -38 zoning with a special exception for use as a medical office building, so it passed additional scrutiny regarding compatibility with surrounding uses at that time. 3. The available uses, if applicable, to which the property maybe put are appropriate to the property in question and compatible with existing and planned uses in the area. The existing character of the neighborhood is a transition from intense commercial and retail within the neighborhood shopping center designated on the north side of the intersection of Lakeview Road and S. Highland Avenue, to moderate intensity office uses on the south side of Lakeview Road, including a law office and dental office. The proposed Residential/Office General FLU is a reasonable transition from Commercial General and Residential High FLU to the west and north of the subject property and Residential Low FLU to the east. While there is an existing residential use on the parcel immediately west of the subject property, it is a multi- family use and designated Residential High FLU. 2 1528 Lakeview Road — Spare Investors Realty, LLC Comprehensive Plan Amendment Standards for Review — Supplemental Responses 4. Sufficient public facilities are available to serve the property. From the available evidence, it appears that the existing building was constructed in 1985 under RM -38 zoning with a special exception for use as a medical office building. it is reasonable to assume that such development approval considered impacts to the adequacy of public facilities to serve the property. The property has split FLU designations. Approximately 83% is Residential High and 17% is Residential Low. Residential High allows for 30 du/ac and 0.6 FAR. Residential/Office General allows for 15 du/ac and 0.5 FAR. The proposed FLU map amendment to Residential/Office General will result in a reduction in residential and non-residential development potential, but will improve marketability by allowing uses more appropriate and historically successful at this property. Any redevelopment of the property must comply with the applicable Community Development Code provisions and establish that there are sufficient public facilities available to serve the property. 5. The amendment will not adversely affect the natural environment. There are no distinct natural features or resources that will be adversely affected merely by the proposed FLU map amendment. From the available evidence, it appears that the existing building was constructed in 1985 under RM -38 zoning with a special exception for use as a medical office building. It is reasonable to assume that such development approval considered impacts to the natural environment. The subject property and immediately adjacent properties are all developed. The proposed FLU map amendment to Residential/Office General will result In a net reduction in residential and non-residential development potential. Any redevelopment of the property must comply with the applicable Community Development Code provisions which include protections against and mitigation of adverse impacts to the natural environment. 6. The amendment will not adversely impact the use of the property in the immediate area. From the available evidence, it appears that the existing building was constructed in 1985 under RM -38 zoning with a special exception for use as a medical office building. It is reasonable to assume that such development approval considered impacts to the use of the property in the immediate area. The historical office use over the past 30+ years is a complementary non- residential use to the neighborhood shopping center designated on the north side of the intersection of Lakeview Road and S. Highland Avenue, which can be utilized to provide services and employment opportunities for the nearby residential uses. . L-4ol q- Vlt)b'8 Planning & Development Department W MAM RW..T Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application [auc��r�xasv.�inrna�,•rarm�u.�rkz Including Future Land Use Map A m en dm en ts ALL APPLICATIONS ARE TO BE FILLED OUT COMPLETELY AND CORRECTLY, AND SUBMITTED IN PERSON (NO FAX OR DELIVERIES) TO THE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY NOON ON THE SCHEDULED DEADLINE DATE. ONE (1) COMPLETE SET OF APPLICATION MATERIALS AS REQUIRED WITHIN IS TO BE SUBMITTED DIGITALLY (COMBINED INTO A SINGLE PDF FILE ONTO A CD/DVD/USB DRIVE) FOR REVIEW BY THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE. SUBSEQUENT SUBMITTAL FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD WILL REQUIRE 11 COMPLETE SETS OF APPLICATION MATERIALS PRINTED (1 ORIGINAL AND 10 COPIES) AND ONE (1) COMBINED DIGITAL COPY IN A MANNER CONSISTENT WITH THE ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL. PLANS AND APPLICATIONS ARE REQUIRED TO BE COLLATED, STAPLED AND FOLDED INTO SETS. IT IS INCUMBENT UPON THE APPLICANT TO SUBMIT COMPLETE AND CORRECT INFORMATION. ANY MISLEADING, DECEPTIVE, INCOMPLETE OR INCORRECT INFORMATION MAY INVALIDATE YOUR APPLICATION. THE APPLICANT, BY FILING THIS APPLICATION, AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE. APPLICATION FEE: $885 Future Land Use Map Amendment only, includes Zoning Atlas Amendment $0 Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment APPLICATION TO AMEND: X FUTURE LAND USE MAP (select one) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (TEXT) PROPERTY OWNER (PER DEED): Spare Investors Realty, LLC MAILING ADDRESS: 5900 98th Avenue North, Pinellas Park, FL 33782 PHONE NUMBER: 727-560-8916 EMAIL: tjerger(&jergerllc.com AGENT OR REPRESENTATIVE: Craig A. Taraszki, Esq. MAILING ADDRESS: -Johnson Pope, 333 3rd Ave N, Suite 200, St. Petersburg, FL 33701 PHONE NUMBER: 727-800-5980 EMAIL: craigt@jpfirm.com ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY (if applicable): 1528 Lakeview Road, Clearwater, FL PARCEL NUMBER(S): 23-29-15-00000-210-0400 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: see attached Exhibit "A" DESCRIPTION OF TEXT N/A AMENDMENT (if applicable): Specifically identify the requested amendment to the Comprehensive Plan 1 528 LAKEVIEW RD LUP2017-09008 Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, (- Page 1 of5 ;Spare Investor ;Zoning: High Density Residential Atlas #: 307A Planning & Development Department '.�>�EAwa-rEa Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application ., �T�Including Future Land Use Map Amendments PLEASE ENSURE THAT THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS FILLED OUT, IN ITS ENTIRETY. FAILURE TO COMPLETE THIS FORM WILL RESULT IN YOUR APPLICATION BEING FOUND INCOMPLETE AND POSSIBLY DEFERRED UNTIL THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION CYCLE. FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATION PRESENT: Residential High (RH) ; Residential Low (RL) REQUESTED: Residential/Office General (R/OG) COUNTYWIDE PLAN MAP CATEGORY SITE AREA: PRESENT: Residential High; Residential Low Medium REQUESTED: Office ZONING DISTRICT PRESENT: High Density Residential MDR); Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) REQUESTED: Office (0) 57,132 sq. ft. MOL MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE DENSITY/INTENSITY(S) : Current/Existing Future Land Use(s): Proposed Future RH: 30 du/ac; 0.6 FAR RL: 5 du/ac; 0.4 FAR R/OG: 15 du/ac; Land Use(s): 0.5 FAR (units, rooms or beds per acre or non- residential square footage) 1.312 acres MOL USE(S): Existing (currently on site or previous use if vacant): medical clinic / office Proposed (new use, if any; plus existing if to remain): medical clinic / office FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATIONS FOR ALL ADJACENT PROPERTY: North: Residential High (RH) South: Residential/Office General (R/OG) & Residential Low (RL) East: Residential Low (RL) West: Residential High (RH) STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. �r Sworn to and subscribed before me this day of Signature of property owner on representative &—:Y?j-a14 6_-,C S-013 . to me and/or by 1a who is personally known has produced as identification. Notary public, My commission Commission # FF 904843 Expires August 23, 2019 B& -4W Thio TiO F4M kon mn 800438MID Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567 Page 2 of 5 Revised 10/05/2016 Planning & Development Department CLE,WRwAY"M ..Comprehensive rehensive Plan Amendment Application Submittal Package Checklist IN ADDITION TO THE COMPLETED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION, ALL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATIONS SHALL INCLUDE A SUBMITTAL PACKAGE THAT INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING: La"If the application is for an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map (LUP), in addition to the application, the applicant must also provide the following: EY Proof of ownership (e.g., copy o ee title insurance policy, or other instrument demonstrating ownership) L"Legal description of the property. If the property is not a platted lot of record, a current boundary survey prepared, signed and sealed by a land surveyor currently registered in the State of Florida is required. ff`�Information demonstrating that the proposed amendment complies with the criteria set forth in Section 4-603.F. The attached Comprehensive Plan Amendment Standards for Review sheet shall be used to provide these responses. �An assessment of the impact of the proposed change on the adequacy of public facilities, the environment, community character, and the fiscal condition of the city. ❑ If the application is for an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan text (CPA), and does not affect an individual parcel of land, in addition to the application, the applicant must also provide the following: ❑ Data and analysis to support such an amendment under Florida Statutes. ❑ Information demonstrating that the proposed amendment complies with the criteria set forth in Section 4-603.F. The attached Comprehensive Plan Amendment Standards for Review sheet shall be used to provide these responses. ❑ A Traffic Impact Study is not required as part of the application for an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map (LUP). A Traffic Impact Study may be provided at the applicant's discretion to supplement the assessment of the impact of the proposed change on the adequacy of public facilities (existing roadways). A Traffic Impact Study may be required at the time a site plan is submitted for development review if the total generated net new trips generated by the proposed development meet one or more conditions outlined on the appropriate application. ❑ PUBLIC HEARING ATTENDANCE: The applicant or applicant's agent is advised to attend all public hearings scheduled for the proposed amendment including public hearings before the Community .Development Board and City Council. Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567 Page 3 of 5 Revised 10/05/2016 Planning & Development Department ��t.�AR�'�'�TER Comprehensive Plan Amendment Standards for Review PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO EACH OF THE SIX (6) STANDARDS FOR REVIEW EXPLAINING HOW, IN DETAIL, THE CRITERION IS BEING COMPLIED WITH PER THIS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT. 1. The amendment will. further implementation of the comprehensive plan consistent with the goals, policies and objectives contained in the plan. See attached applicaton supplement. 2. The amendment is not inconsistent with other provisions of the comprehensive plan. See attached application supplement. 3. The available uses, if applicable, to which the property may be put are appropriate to the property in question and compatible with existing and planned uses in the area. See attached application supplement. 4. Sufficient public facilities are available to serve the property. See attached application supplement. 5. The amendment will not adversely affect the natural environment. See attached application supplement. 6. The amendment will not adversely impact the use of property in the immediate area. See attached application supplement. Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567 Page 4 of 5 Revised 10/05/2016 1528 Lakeview Road —Spare Investors Realty, LLC Comprehensive Plan Amendment Standards for Review — Supplemental Responses 1. The amendment will further implementation of the comprehensive plan consistent with the goals, policies and objectives contained in the plans. Table A-1. The primary use of the existing Residential High FLU is high-density residential and residential equivalent uses. The primary use of the existing Residential Low FLU is low-density residential. The primary use of the proposed Residential/Office General FLU is o ice medium - density residential and residential equivalent uses. The property was developed in 1985 under RM -38 zoning as a medical office building and that has been its primary use for the past 30+ years. This application is to conform the FLU and zoning designation to the historical development and uses of the property. A.2 Goal. A sufficient variety and amount of future land use categories shall be provided to accommodate public demand and promote infill development. A.2.2.13 Policy. All land use categories on the Future Land Use Map shall be consistent with the density and intensity standards and other standards contained in the Pinellas Planning Council Countywide Plan Rules, including criteria and standards for nomenclature, continuum of plan classifications and categories, use and locational characteristics, map delineation, other standards, and special rules. The proposed Residential/Office General FLU are consistent with the density and intensity standards and other standards for the proposed Office Countywide Plan Map category. The property currently has split FLU and Countywide Plan Map categories. A.5 Goal. The City of Clearwater shall identify and utilize a citywide design structure comprised of hierarchy of places and linkages. The citywide design structure will serve as a guide to development and land use decisions while protecting those elements that make the city uniquely Clearwater. A.5.1 Objective. Establish the Hierarchy of Places as shown on Map A-14. A.5.1.5 Policy. Identify Neighborhood Shopping Centers And Surrounding Non -Residential Uses: a limited number of commercial establishments that fulfill the basic needs of residents within one mile of the center. According to Map A-14, the northwest and northeast corners of Lakeview Road and S. Highland Avenue is designated as a neighborhood shopping center. The subject property is just east of this shopping center area, which is an appropriate location for uses allowable within the proposed R/OG FLU category and Office zoning. According to the Attachment to Map A-14, the hierarchy of places is: 1. Major Activity Centers 2. Destination Points 3. Multi -Neighborhood Shopping Centers and Surrounding Non -Residential Uses 4. Neighborhood Shopping Centers and Surrounding Non -Residential Uses S. Landmarks 1528 Lakeview Road—Spare Investors Realty, LLC Comprehensive Plan Amendment Standards for Review — Supplemental Responses 6. Neighborhood Character Features The proposed FLU map amendment and rezoning will not negatively impact any major activity centers, destination points or multi -neighborhood shopping centers. The historical office use over the past 30+ years is a complementary non-residential use to the neighborhood shopping center designated on the north side of the intersection of Lakeview Road and S. Highland Avenue, which can be utilized to provide services and employment opportunities for the nearby residential uses. A.5.5.1 Policy. Development should be designed to maintain and support the existing or envisioned character of the neighborhood. A.5.5.4 Policy. The transition between intensive redevelopment areas and adjacent low density areas should be sensitive to the scale of development in those low density areas. The existing character of the neighborhood is a transition from intense commercial and retail within the neighborhood shopping center designated on the north side of the intersection of Lakeview Road and S. Highland Avenue, to moderate intensity office uses on the south side of Lakeview Road, including a law office and dental office. The proposed Residential/Office General FLU is a reasonable transition from Commercial General and Residential High FLU to the west of the subject property and Residential Low FLU to the east. While there is an existing residential use immediately west of the subject property, it is a multi -family use. 2. The amendment is not inconsistent with other provisions of the comprehensive plan. The proposed Residential/Office General FLU designation is not inconsistent with other provisions of the comprehensive plan. While there can be conflicts between non-residential and residential uses, the requirements of the Community Development Code are intended to mitigate and minimize those conflicts. From the available evidence, it appears that the existing building constructed in 1985 under RM -38 zoning with a special exception for use as a medical office building, so it passed additional scrutiny regarding compatibility with surrounding uses at that time. 3. The available uses, if applicable, to which the property may be put are appropriate to the property in question and compatible with existing and planned uses in the area. The existing character of the neighborhood is a transition from intense commercial and retail within the neighborhood shopping center designated on the north side of the intersection of Lakeview Road and S. Highland Avenue, to moderate intensity office uses on the south side of Lakeview Road, including a law office and dental office. The proposed Residential/Office General FLU is a reasonable transition from Commercial General and Residential High FLU to the west and north of the subject property and Residential Low FLU to the east. While there is an existing residential use on the parcel immediately west of the subject property, it is a multi- family use and designated Residential High FLU. 2 1528 Lakeview Road—Spare Investors Realty, LLC Comprehensive Plan Amendment Standards for Review—Supplemental Responses 4. Sufficient public facilities are available to serve the property. From the available evidence, it appears that the existing building was constructed in 1985 under RM -38 zoning with a special exception for use as a medical office building. It is reasonable to assume that such development approval considered impacts to the adequacy of public facilities to serve the property. The property has split FLU designations. Approximately 83% is Residential High and 17% is Residential Low. Residential High allows for 30 du/ac and 0.6 FAR. Residential/Office General allows for 15 du/ac and 0.5 FAR. The proposed FLU map amendment to Residential/Office General will result in a reduction in residential and non-residential development potential, but will improve marketability by allowing uses more appropriate and historically successful at this property. Any redevelopment of the property must comply with the applicable Community Development Code provisions and establish that there are sufficient public facilities available to serve the property. 5. The amendment will not adversely affect the natural environment. There are no distinct natural features or resources that will be adversely affected merely by the proposed FLU map amendment. From the available evidence, it appears that the existing building was constructed in 1985 under RM -38 zoning with a special exception for use as a medical office building. It is reasonable to assume that such development approval considered impacts to the natural environment. The subject property and immediately adjacent properties are all developed. The proposed FLU map amendment to Residential/Office General will result in a net reduction in residential and non-residential development potential. Any redevelopment of the property must comply with the applicable Community Development Code provisions which include protections against and mitigation of adverse impacts to the natural environment. 6. The amendment will not adversely impact the use of the property in the immediate area. From the available evidence, it appears that the existing building was constructed in 1985 under RM -38 zoning with a special exception for use as a medical office building. It is reasonable to assume that such development approval considered impacts to the use of the property in the immediate area. The historical office use over the past 30+ years is a complementary non- residential use to the neighborhood shopping center designated on the north side of the intersection of Lakeview Road and S. Highland Avenue, which can be utilized to provide services and employment opportunities for the nearby residential uses. 3 I#: 2006004188 BK: 14853 PG: 882, 01/05/2006 at 11:29 AM, RECORDING 2 PAGES $18.50 D DOC STAMP CC- -CTION $9100.00 KEN BURKE, CLERK OF 'RT PINELLAS COUNTY, FL BY DEPUTY ( C: CLKPR03 THIS INSTRUMENT PREPARED BY AND RETURN TO: FREEDOM TITLE AGENCY, INC. 635 Cleveland Street Clearwater, FL 33755 Property Appraisers Parcel Identification (Folio) Numbers: 23/29/15/00000/210/0 400 Grantee SS #: SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDING DATA THIS WARRANTY DEED, made the 2nd day of January, A.D. 2006 by Joseph Francis, a married man, herein caned the grantor, to Spare Investors Realty, LLC, Florida Limited Liability Company whose post office address Is 5900 - 98th Avenue North, Pinellas Park, FL 33782, hereinafter called the Grantee: (Wherever used heroin the farms "grantor' and -grantee" Include all the parties to this instrument and the heir., legal repro... fall— and assigns of individuals, and the successors and: assigns of corporations) W I T N E S S E T H: That the grantor,.for and in consideration of the sum of TEN AND 001100'S ($10.00) Dollars and other valuable considerations, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, hereby grants, bargains, sells, aliens, remises, releases, conveys and confirms unto the grantee all that certain land situate in PINELLAS County, State of Florida, viz: SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF Subject to easements, restrictions and reservations of record, and to taxes for the year 2005 and thereafter. TOGETHER, with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the same in fee simple forever AND, the grantor hereby covenants with said grantee that the grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that the grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land, and hereby warrants the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever; and that said land is free of all encumbrances, except taxes accruing subsequent to December 31, 2003. _ IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said grantor has signed and sealed these presents the day and year first above written. and dlflivered in the presence of: #1 Witness #2 Signafu—re 1N " "" — v r r .Zwrr— Witness #2 Printed Name STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINELLAS KLTl16Q The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this Francis who i sonaffy nTc own to me or has produced SEAL My Commission Expires: '. 40D V5194 -G 7/ Joseph Francis—by Chris Esteir, his / (/ 3665 East Bay Drive #204.206, L rgo, FL 33771 / attorney in fact Chris Estey, attorney in fact for day of C, 20 OG by/Joseph VasidtHicatidn. Nota Signature Printed Notary Signature PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF. REC. BK 14853 PG 883 PARCELI Lot Eighteen (18), GATES KNOLL, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 33, page 56, public records of Pinellas County, Florida. PARCELII A parcel in the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 23, Township 29 South, Range 15 East, further described as follows: Begin from the Southeast comer of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 23-29e15, also the intersection of centerlines of rights-of-way for Lake Avenue and Lakeview Road; run thence along the centerline of the said Lakeview Road right-of-way North 88° 59'34" West, 670.52 feet; thence North 00°_.12' 40" West, 50.00 feet for a Point of Beginning; thence run along the Northerly right-of-way line of the said Lakeview Road, North 88° 59' 34" West, 173.16 feet; thence North 00° 10' 16" West, 258.30 feet; thence North 89° 57'57" East, 35.62 feet; thence South 76° 30'26" East, 141.29 feet; thence South 00° 12'40" East, 228.62 feet to the Point of Beginning. SURVEY of an Ingress/Egress easement in the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 23, Township 29 South, Range 15 East Further described as follows: Begin from the SE corner of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of the said Section 23-29-15, also the intersection of right-of-way centerlines for Lake Avenue and Lakeview Road, and run thence along the right-of-way centerline of the said Lakeview Road, N 88° 59'34" West, 670.52 feet; thence N 00° 12'40" West, 50.00 feet to a point along the Northerly right-of-way line of the said Lakeview Road; thence along the centerline of SKYVIEW AVENUE,'Per Gates Knoll S/D, Plat Book 33, Page 56 as recorded in the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, North 00° 12'40" West, 218.62 feet for a Point of Beginning; thence run North 80° 22' 27" West, 110.59 feet; thence along the arc of a curve to the right, R=50.00', D=50° 18'40.6", A= 43.90 feet, C=42.5I feet, CB=North 55° 13' 06.7" West; thence North 89° 57' 57" East, 6.47 feet; thence South 76° 35'57.83" East, 141.29 feet; thence South 000 12' 40" East, 10.00 feet to the Point of Beginning. PARCEL III A portion of Lot I, FORREST HILL ESTATES UNIT 51 according to the plat recorded in Plat Book 58, page 34, public records of Pinellas County, Florida being more particularly described as follows: Commence at the center of Section 23, Township 29 South, Range 15 East and run along the North-South centerline of said Section 23, North 0° 21'39" West a distance of.1331.53 feet to the 40 Acre Line; thence along said 40 Acre Line, run North 88° 59'34" West a distance of 670.52 feet; thence run North 0° 12'40" West a distance of 50.00 feet to the North right-of-way line of Lakeview Road; thence along said right-of- way line, run North 88° 59'34" West a distance of 173.08 feet to the Point of Beginning; thence run North 0° 10' 16" West a distance of 67.00 feet; thence run North 88° 59'34" West a distance of 54.84 feet; thence run South 0° 02'03" East a distance of 44.00 feet; thence run North 88° 59'34" West a distance of 54.00 feet; thence run South 0° 02' 03" East a distance of 23.00 feet; thence run South 880 59' 34" East a distance of 109 feet to the Point of Beginning. ALSO KNOWN AS: Lot 1, Block 1, KNIGHT & HARRIS, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 95, page 38 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, FLorida. THIS IS NOT THE HOMESTEAD OF THE GRANTOR HEREIN. EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY The land referred to herein below is situated in the County of Pinellas, State of Florida, and is described as follows: PARCELI Lot Eighteen (18), GATES KNOLL, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 33, page 56, public records of Pinellas County, Florida. PARCEL II A parcel in the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 23, Township 29 South, Range 15 East, further described as follows: Begin from the Southeast corner of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 23-29-15, also the intersection of centerlines of rights-of-way for Lake Avenue and Lakeview road; run thence along the centerline of the said Lakeview Road right-of-way North 88° 59' 34" West, 670.52 feet; thence North 00° 12' 40" West, 50.00 feet for a Point of Beginning; thence run along the Northerly right-of-way line of the said Lakeview Road, North 88° 59' 34" West, 173.16 feet; thence North 00° 10' 16" West, 258.30 feet; thence North 89° 57'57" East, 35.62 feet; thence South 76° 30'26" East, 141.29 feet; thence South 00° 12'40" East, 228.62 feet to the Point of Beginning. Ingress/Egress easement in the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 23, Township 29 South, Range 15 East, Further described as follows: Begin from the SE corner of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of the said Section 23-29-15, also the intersection of right-of-way centerlines for Lake Avenue and Lakeview Road, and run thence along the right-of-way centerline of the said Lakeview Road, N 88° 59' 34" West, 670.52 feet; thence N 00° 12'40" West, 50.00 feet to a point along the Northerly right-of-way line of the said Lakeview Road; thence along the centerline of SKYVIEW AVENUE, Per Gates Knoll S/D, Plat Book 33, Page 56, as recorded in the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, North 00° 12' 40" West, 218.62 feet for a Point of Beginning; thence run North 80° 22' 27" West, 110.59 feet; thence along the arc of a curve to the right, R= 50.00', D= 50° 18'40 .6", A= 43.90 feet, C= 42.51 feet, CB= North 55° 13'06.7" West; thence North 89° 57' 57" East, 6.47 feet; thence South 76° 35' 57.83" East, 141.29 feet; thence South 00° 12'40' East, 10.00 feet to the Point of Beginning. Parcel III A portion of Lot 1, FORREST HILL ESTATES UNIT 5, according to the plat recorded in PLat Book 58, page 34, public records of Pinellas County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: Commence at the center of Section 23, Township 29 South, Range 15 East and run along the North-South centerline of said Section 23, North 0° 21'39" West a distance of 1331.53 feet to EM the 40 Acre Line; thence along said 40 Acre Line, run North 88° 59' 34" West a distance of 670.52 feet; thence run North 0° 12'40" West a distance of 50.00 feet to the North right-of-way line of Lakeview Road; thence along said right-of-way line, run North 88° 59'34" West a distance of 173.08 feet to the Point of Beginning; thence run North 0° 10' 16" West a distance of 67.00 feet; thence run North 88° 59' 34" West a distance of 54.84 feet; thence run South 0° 02' 03" East a distance of 44.00 feet; thence run North 88° 59' 34" West a distance of 54.00 feet; thence run South 0° 02'03" East a distance of 23.00 feet; thence run South 88° 59'34" East a distance of 109 feet to the Point of Beginning. Also Known as: Lot 1, Block 1, KNIGHT & HARRIS, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 95, page 38, public records of Pinellas County, Florida. A-2 JOHNSON POPE 333 3rd Avenue North Suite 200 St. Petersburg, Florida 33701 BOKOR RU P P E L & Telephone: (727) 800-5980 Facsimile: (727) 800-5981 BURNS, LLP Email: CraigT@JPFirm.com COUNSELORS AT LAW TAMPA ■ CLEARWATER ■ ST. PETERSBURG Craig A. Taraszki File No. 064508.137104 September 1, 2017 VIA HAND DELIVERY L tA FZ}�� City of Clearwater Planning & Development Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 Re: Comprehensive Plan (FLU Map) Amendment & Zoning Atlas Amendment Application 1528 Lakeview Road Parcel No. 23-29-15-00000-210-0400 On behalf of Spare Investors Realty, LLC, the owner of the above referenced property, please find enclosed the following items in support of their applications: 1. One (1) original of the completed Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application, including: a. Submittal Package Checklist b. Standards for Review c. Standards for Review — Supplemental Responses d. Copy of Warranty Deed recorded January 5, 2006, in Book 14853, Page 882, of the Official Records of Pinellas County, Florida e. Exhibit "A" Legal Description of Property 2. One (1) original of the completed Zoning Atlas Amendment Application, including: a. Submittal Package Checklist b. Standards for Review c. Standards for Review — Supplemental Responses d. Copy of Warranty Deed recorded January 5, 2006, in Book 14853, Page 882, of the Official Records of Pinellas County, Florida e. Copy of Resolution 59-30 by the City of Clearwater, recorded April 30, 1959, in Book 591, Page 265, of the Official Records of Pinellas County, Florida f. Exhibit "A" Legal Description of Property 3. One (1) copy of the Project Narrative; 4. One (1) copy of the Survey of the subject property prepared by Target Land Surveying, Inc., last revised January 3, 2006; 5. One (1) executed original of the Affidavit of Ownership; 6. One (1) USB drive containing a PDF of items 1-5 above; and 7. Check No. 7034 in the amount of $885.00 payable to the City of Clearwater. 7JOHNSON PE D BOKOR RUPPEL & BURNS, LLP COUNSELORS AT LAW TAMPA ■ CLEARWATER ■ ST. PETERSBURG 1528 Lakeview Road — FLU Map & Zoning Atlas Amendment September 1, 2017 Page 2 Regards, JOHNSON, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, LLP Craig A. Taraszki Enclosures (7) cc (email): Tom Jerger Peter Monroe r 1flUGFff .4ND BE14U*n FUL • BAY M MACH s PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: November 21, 2017 AGENDA ITEM: G.3. CASE: LUP2017-09008 REQUEST: To amend the Future Land Use Map designation from Residential Low (RL) and Residential High (RH) to Residential/Office General (R/OG) GENERAL DATA: Applicant ......................... Craig A. Taraszki, Esq., Johnson Pope Owner ............................. Spare Investors Realty, LLC Location .......................... 1528 Lakeview Road, approximately 500 feet east of South Highland Avenue Property Size ................... 1.332 acres Background: This case involves a 1.332 -acre property located on the north side of Lakeview Road approximately 500 feet east of South Highland Avenue. The parcel, owned by Spare Investors Realty, LLC, is occupied by a vacant 10,196 square foot office building. Currently, the property has two future land use map designations: the office building and main parking lot occupy the portion designated Residential High (RH) which is applied to the majority of the site, and additional parking and landscaping occupy the remainder of the site, which is designated Residential Low (RL). Maps 1 and 2 show the general location of the property and an aerial view of the amendment area. The site was originally developed in 1985 as a one-story medical clinic and was used as an orthopedic surgery center for many years. The building is currently listed for sale as a general office. It is important to note that neither medical clinics nor offices are listed permitted uses within the current residential zoning districts, consistent with the underlying future land use categories. This disconnect between the design purposes of the building and the property's current designations has hampered efforts by the property owner to attract new tenants. The request is to change the Future Land Use Map designations of the property from Residential Low (RL) and Residential High (RH) to Residential/Office General (R/OG). A request to rezone the property from the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) and High Density Residential (HDR) Districts to the Office (0) District is being processed concurrently with this case (see REZ2017-09008). The requested amendments would allow the property to continue to be used as an office or medical clinic, consistent with its historic use. The City is committed to preserving land and buildings that are needed to 0 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT Level III Comprehensive Plan Amendment Review LONG RANGE PLANNING DIVISION attract target industries and accommodate higher -wage jobs, such as this one. The proposed change is supported by the City's stated economic development goals and objectives. O ¢ RACIIEL CT W q C ¢ W G � O L J N Z 2 Y ¢ U BUDLEIGN ST Q "' 0 JEFFORDS ST JEFFORDS ST y JEFF Sr I BARRY S7 BARRY RD PROJECT i SITE TUSCOLA ST ; TUS COLA RD MILTONST Y O ILLINOIS RD BROWNING ST --- OIIA—NU i i LAKEVIEW Rp y O VALENCIA ST = NORMANDVPARK DR p TANGERINE ST y BALMORAL DR 0 SATSUMA ST PINEWOOD DR A� SATSUMA ST tiPARKSIOE ORANGE ST OR U ORANGE ST ME ST LIME ST o TEMPLE ST O CITRUS ST C CITRUS ST i I LOCATION MAP Map 1 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH Community Development Board — November 21, 2017 LUP2017-09008 - Page 2 of 9 Map 2 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT Level III Comprehensive Pian Amendment Review LONG RANGE PLANNING DIVISION Vicinity Characteristics: Map 3 shows the existing surrounding uses. To the east and the south, in unincorporated Pinellas County, are single family neighborhoods. To the north are two age restricted (55+) residential communities (Pine Berry Senior Apartments and Kalmia Condominiums), one of which accesses Lakeview Road to the west of the subject property. Also to the southwest are offices, and to the west there are commercial uses. Map 3 As shown on Map 4, the abutting future land use designations are Residential High (RH) to the north and immediately adjacent to the west, and Residential Low (RL) to the east and south (Pinellas County). The intersection of South Highland Avenue and Lakeview Road has Commercial General (CG) along the north side of the intersection, and Residential/Office General (R/OG) along the south side of the intersection. Both of those designations extend to the east of the intersection towards the subject property . A comparison between the uses, densities and intensities allowed by the present and proposed Future Lan d Use Map designations appears in Table 1, along with the consistent zoning districts. Community Development Board —November 21, 2017 LUP2017-09008 -Page 3 of 9 BARapV� R, BAR"" ntia gi F hi y tia �f r— ------ 7VSCOLA RO o -L F mi es' tie U I- r i 'N.R.WOfS RD N OTTAWA RD ® �(D i - LAKEWWRO �i'f lCf 7 VALENCIAST Sig - Fa EXISTING SURROUNDING USES MAP Map 3 As shown on Map 4, the abutting future land use designations are Residential High (RH) to the north and immediately adjacent to the west, and Residential Low (RL) to the east and south (Pinellas County). The intersection of South Highland Avenue and Lakeview Road has Commercial General (CG) along the north side of the intersection, and Residential/Office General (R/OG) along the south side of the intersection. Both of those designations extend to the east of the intersection towards the subject property . A comparison between the uses, densities and intensities allowed by the present and proposed Future Lan d Use Map designations appears in Table 1, along with the consistent zoning districts. Community Development Board —November 21, 2017 LUP2017-09008 -Page 3 of 9 3 As shown on Map 4, the abutting future land use designations are Residential High (RH) to the north and immediately adjacent to the west, and Residential Low (RL) to the east and south (Pinellas County). The intersection of South Highland Avenue and Lakeview Road has Commercial General (CG) along the north side of the intersection, and Residential/Office General (R/OG) along the south side of the intersection. Both of those designations extend to the east of the intersection towards the subject property . A comparison between the uses, densities and intensities allowed by the present and proposed Future Lan d Use Map designations appears in Table 1, along with the consistent zoning districts. Community Development Board —November 21, 2017 LUP2017-09008 -Page 3 of 9 n PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT Level III Comprehensive Plan Amendment Review LONG RANGE PLANNING DMSION _`. .. - - FLUM Designation Present FLUM Designation Reqnested FLUM Designation ResidentialPresent 1 Is Low Density Residential High Density Residential; Medium Density Residential; Primary Uses: Residential Equivalent Residential Equivalent; Office Maximum Density: 5 Dwelling Units Per Acre 30 Dwelling Units Per Acre 15 Dwelling Units Per Acre Map 4 Map 5 Table 1. Uses, Densities and Intensities Allowed by Present and Proposed Future Land Use Designations FLUM Designation Present FLUM Designation Reqnested FLUM Designation ResidentialPresent Low Density Residential High Density Residential; Medium Density Residential; Primary Uses: Residential Equivalent Residential Equivalent; Office Maximum Density: 5 Dwelling Units Per Acre 30 Dwelling Units Per Acre 15 Dwelling Units Per Acre Maximum FAR 0.40; ISR 0.65 FAR 0.60; ISR 0.85 FAR 0.50; ISR 0.75 Intensity: Consistent Zoning Low Density Residential (LDR); Medium High Density Medium Density Residential Districts: Low Medium Density Residential Residential (MHDR); High (MDR); Office (0) a,MDR) Densitv Residential (HDR) Conununity Development Board — November 21, 2017 LUP2017-09008 - Page 4 of 9 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT Level III Comprehensive Plan Amendment Review LONG RANGE PLANNING DIVISION REVIEW CRITERIA: Consistency with the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan [Sections 4-603.F.1 and 4-603.F.21 Recommended Findings of Fact: Applicable goals, objective and policy of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan which support the proposed amendment include: Goal A.2 A sufficient variety and amount of future land use categories shall be provided to accommodate public demand and promote infill development. Goal A.4. The City shall work toward a land use pattern that can be supported by the available community and public facilities that would be required to serve the development. Policy A.5.5.1 Development shall be designed to maintain and support the existing or envisioned character of the neighborhood. Objective A.6.4 Due to the built -out character of the city of Clearwater, compact urban development within the urban service area shall be promoted through the application of the Clearwater Community Development Code. The proposed Residential/Office General (R/OG) future land use designation is compatible with the surrounding single family residential, multi -family residential, office and commercial uses. The applicant has indicated that the property will continue to be utilized as an office, which is the historical use of the property. In addition, the proposal does not degrade the level of service for public facilities below the adopted standards (a detailed public facilities analysis follows in this report). The Residential/Office General (R/OG) designation allows for less intense development than the current Residential High (RH) designation located on a majority of the parcel, but allows for more intense development than the Residential Low (RL) designation on the eastern portion. Overall, the scale of development allowed will be less than permitted by the current land use designations. Recommended Conclusions of Law: The request does not conflict with the goals, objectives and policies of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan and furthers said plan as indicated in the goals, objective and policy listed above. Consistency with the Countywide Rules Recommended Findings of Fact: The underlying Countywide Plan Map categories on the proposed amendment area are Residential High (RH) and Residential Low Medium (RLM). Residential properties to the east and south are Residential Low Medium (RLM), with Residential High (RH) designated to the north and west. There are properties designated Office (0) to the south and designated Retail & Services (R&S) to the west at the intersection of Highland Avenue and Lakeview Road. The proposed City of Clearwater future land use designation of Residential/Office General (R/OG) will necessitate a Countywide Plan Map amendment from the Residential Low Medium (RLM) and Residential High (RH) categories to the Office (0) category in order to maintain consistency between the City's Future Land Use Map and the Countywide Plan Map. Community Development Board — November 21, 2017 LUP2017-09008 - Page 5 of 9 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT Level LII Comprehensive Plan Amendment Review LONG RANGE PLANNING DIVISION Section 2.3.3.5 of the Countywide Rules states that the Office (0) category is intended to accommodate areas developed, or appropriate to be developed, with office uses, low -impact employment uses, and residential uses (subject to an acreage threshold), in areas characterized by a transition between residential and commercial uses and in areas well-suited for community -scale residential/office mixed-use development. The current and proposed use, as indicated by the applicant, is' an office use, which is an appropriate use within the area and consistent with the proposed and surrounding Countywide Plan Map categories. Recommended Conclusions of Law: The proposed Future Land Use Map amendment is consistent with the purpose of the proposed category in the Countywide Rules. Compatibility with Surrounding Properties/Character of the City & Neighborhood [Section 4-603.F.3 and Section 4-603.F.61 Recommended Findings of Fact: Existing surrounding uses consist of single family homes (east and south), offices (southwest), multi -family residential (north and west) and commercial (west). The proposed use of the subject property as office (currently developed as such) is compatible with the surrounding properties and neighborhood. The proposed Residential/Office General (R/OG) future land use category primarily permits residential development at a density of 15 dwelling units per acre and non-residential development at a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of 0.50. The future land use designations of surrounding properties include Residential Low (RL), Residential High (RH), Residential/Office General (R/OG) and Commercial General (CG). The proposed Residential/Office General (R/OG) future land use category, which primarily allows for moderate density residential, residential equivalent uses and office uses, is consistent with the surrounding future land use designations that exist in the vicinity of the subject property, which primarily allow low and high density residential uses as well as office uses. The proposed amendment will allow development that will serve as a transition from the high intensity commercial uses at the intersection of South Highland Avenue and Lakeview Road west of the subject property to the single family residential uses to the east of the property. Recommended Conclusions of Law: The proposed Residential/Office General (R/OG) future land use category is in character with the Future Land Use Map designations in the area. Further, the proposal is compatible with surrounding uses and consistent with the character of the surrounding properties and neighborhood. Sufficiency of Public Facilities [Section 4-603.F.41 Recommended Findings of Fact: To assess the sufficiency of public facilities needed to support potential development on the proposed amendment area, the maximum development potential of the property under the present and requested City Future Land Use Map designations were analyzed. Community Development Board — November 21, 2017 LUP2017-09008 - Page 6 of 9 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT Level M Comprehensive Plan Amendment Review LONG RANGE PLANNING DIVISION Table 2. Development Potential for Existing & Proposed FL UM Designations As shown in the table, there is a decrease in development potential across the amendment area which would reduce demand on public facilities as detailed further below. The following analysis compares the maximum potential development of the proposed Residential/Office General (R/OG) future land use developed with an office use (29,010 square feet) to the maximum development potential of the existing Residential Low (RL) and Residential High (RH) future land use categories developed with a residential use (34 dwelling units). However, since the current and proposed use of the property is that of an office, it is likely that the demand on current public facilities will remain the same. Potable Water The reduction in development potential from this amendment would result in a decrease in potable water use of 5,952 gallons per day. This is determined by comparing the potential potable water utilization of a nonresidential development built to the maximum square footage allowed by the proposed land use (2,901 gallons per day) to the potential utilization of a residential development built to the maximum number of dwelling units allowed by the current land use designation (8,853 gallons per day). Wastewater The reduction in development potential from this amendment would also result in a decrease in wastewater production of 5,648 gallons per day. This is determined by comparing the potential wastewater generation of the proposed land use developed with a nonresidential use (2,320 gallons) to the potential wastewater generation of the current land use designation developed with a residential use (7,968 gallons). Solid Waste The proposed amendment could result in a decrease of 7.9 tons per year of solid waste generated when comparing the amount of waste generated by an office use to that of 34 dwelling units. All solid waste disposal is handled by Pinellas County at the Pinellas County Waste -to -Energy Plant and the Bridgeway Acres Sanitary Landfill which has significant capacity. Additionally, the City provides a full-service citywide recycling program which diverts waste from the landfill, helping to extend the lifespan of Bridgeway Acres. There is excess solid waste capacity to serve the amendment area. Community Development Board -- November 21; 2017 LUP2017-09008 - Page 7 of 9 1 Net Change Site Area 0.177 AC 1.155 AC 1.332 AC (7,710 SF) (50,311 SF) (58,021 SF) Maximum 1 DUs 34 DUs 19 DUs -16 DUs Development 0 SF' 30,187SF 29,010 SF -1,177 SF Potential 0.40 FAR 0.60 0.50 FAR -0.10 FAR Notes: 1. Nonresidential uses not permitted through consistent Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District Abbreviations: FLUM — Future Land Use Map DUs — Dwelling Units AC — Acres FAR — Floor Area Ratio SF — Square feet As shown in the table, there is a decrease in development potential across the amendment area which would reduce demand on public facilities as detailed further below. The following analysis compares the maximum potential development of the proposed Residential/Office General (R/OG) future land use developed with an office use (29,010 square feet) to the maximum development potential of the existing Residential Low (RL) and Residential High (RH) future land use categories developed with a residential use (34 dwelling units). However, since the current and proposed use of the property is that of an office, it is likely that the demand on current public facilities will remain the same. Potable Water The reduction in development potential from this amendment would result in a decrease in potable water use of 5,952 gallons per day. This is determined by comparing the potential potable water utilization of a nonresidential development built to the maximum square footage allowed by the proposed land use (2,901 gallons per day) to the potential utilization of a residential development built to the maximum number of dwelling units allowed by the current land use designation (8,853 gallons per day). Wastewater The reduction in development potential from this amendment would also result in a decrease in wastewater production of 5,648 gallons per day. This is determined by comparing the potential wastewater generation of the proposed land use developed with a nonresidential use (2,320 gallons) to the potential wastewater generation of the current land use designation developed with a residential use (7,968 gallons). Solid Waste The proposed amendment could result in a decrease of 7.9 tons per year of solid waste generated when comparing the amount of waste generated by an office use to that of 34 dwelling units. All solid waste disposal is handled by Pinellas County at the Pinellas County Waste -to -Energy Plant and the Bridgeway Acres Sanitary Landfill which has significant capacity. Additionally, the City provides a full-service citywide recycling program which diverts waste from the landfill, helping to extend the lifespan of Bridgeway Acres. There is excess solid waste capacity to serve the amendment area. Community Development Board -- November 21; 2017 LUP2017-09008 - Page 7 of 9 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT Level III Comprehensive Plan Amendment Review LONG RANGE PLANNING DIVISION Wo llIreI 1 The City's adopted LOS for parkland acreage, which is 4 acres per 1,000 population, will not be impacted by this proposed amendment. Under both the existing and proposed land use, the LOS citywide will remain at 15.46 acres per 1,000 population. Stormwater Site plan approval will be required before the property can be redeveloped. At that time, the stormwater management system for the site will be required to meet all City and SWFWMD stormwater management criteria. Streets The subject property is located on the north side of Lakeview Road approximately 500 feet east of South Highland Avenue. To evaluate potential impacts to streets, the typical traffic impacts figure (trips per day per acre) in the Countywide Rules for the corresponding Countywide Plan Map categories (current and proposed) are compared. The current number of trips per day (198 trips) is calculated based on the traffic generation numbers for the Residential Low Medium (RLM) category (67 trips per day per acre) and the Residential High (RH) category (162 trips per day per acre). However, the site is developed with an office, which based on the traffic generation numbers for the corresponding Countywide Plan Map category of Office (0) (89 trips per day per acre), would generate 118 trips. This is a decrease of 80 trips per day compared to the number of trips under the current designations. Recommended Conclusions of Law: Based upon the findings of fact, it is determined that the proposed change will not result in the degradation of the existing levels of service for potable water, sanitary sewer, solid waste, parkland, stormwater management and streets. Impact on Natural Resources [Section 4-603.F.51 Recommended Findings of Fact: No wetlands appear to be located on the subject property. The City's codes require that development is compliant with the City's tree preservation, landscaping and stormwater management requirements. Recommended Conclusions of Law: Based upon the findings of fact, it is determined that the proposed Future Land Use Map amendment will not negatively impact natural resources on the subject property. Conun-wi-Ity Development Board — November 21, 2017 LUP2017-09008 - Page 8 of 9 Level III Comprehensive Plan Amendment Review SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT LONG RANGE PLANNING DIVISION No amendment to the Comprehensive Plan or Future Land Use Map shall be recommended for approval or receive a final action of approval unless it complies with the standards contained in Section 4-603.F, Community Development Code. Table 3 below depicts the consistency of the proposed amendment with the standards pursuant to Section 4-603.F: Table 3. Consistency with Community Development Code Standards for Review CDC Section 4-603 Standard Consistent Inconsistent F.1 The amendment will further implementation of the X Comprehensive Plan consistent with the goals, policies and objectives contained in the Plan. F.2 The amendment is not inconsistent with other provisions X of the Comprehensive Plan. F.3 The available uses, if applicable, to which the properties X may be put are appropriate to the properties in question and compatible with existing and planned uses in the area. FA Sufficient public facilities are available to serve the X properties. F.5 The amendment will not adversely affect the natural X environment. F.6 The amendment will not adversely impact the use of X properties in the immediate area. Based on the foregoing, the Planning and Development Department recommends the following action: Recommend APPROVAL of the Future Land Use Map Amendment from Residential Low (RL) and Residential High (RH) to Residential/Office General (R/OG). / Prepared by Planning and Development Department Staff- - ' Kyle Brotherton Senior Planner ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance No. 9094-18 Resume Photographs of Site and Vicinity Community Development Board — November 21, 2017 LUP2017-09008 - Page 9 of 9 ORDINANCE NO. 9094-18 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY, TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR 1.332 ACRES OF REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF LAKEVIEW ROAD APPROXIMATELY 500 FEET EAST OF SOUTH HIGHLAND AVENUE, WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS 1528 LAKEVIEW ROAD, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756, FROM RESIDENTIAL LOW (RL) AND RESIDENTIAL HIGH (RH) TO RESIDENTIAL/OFFICE GENERAL (R/OG); PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the amendment to the Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan of the City as set forth in this ordinance is found to be reasonable, proper and appropriate, and is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan; now, therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. The Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Clearwater is amended by designating the land use categories for the hereinafter described property, as follows: Property Land Use Category See attached Exhibit A for Legal Description From: Residential Low (RL) and Residential High (RH) To: Residential/Office General (R/OG) (LUP2017-09008) The map attached as Exhibit B is hereby incorporated by reference. Section 2. The City Council does hereby certify that this ordinance is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect contingent upon approval of the land use designation by the Pinellas County Board of Commissioners, where applicable, and thirty-one (31) days post -adoption. If this ordinance is appealed within thirty (30) days after adoption, then this ordinance will take effect only after approval of the land use designation by the Pinellas County Board of Commissioners and upon issuance of a final order determining this amendment to be in compliance either by the Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO) or the Administration Commission, where applicable, pursuant to section 163.3187, Florida Statutes. The Community Development Coordinator is authorized to transmit to Forward Pinellas, in its role as the Pinellas Planning Council, Ordinance No. 909418 an application to amend the Countywide Plan in order to achieve consistency with the Future Land Use Plan Element of the City's Comprehensive Plan as amended by this ordinance. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED George N. Cretekos Mayor Approved as to form: Attest: Camilo A. Soto Rosemarie Call Assistant City Attorney City Clerk Ordinance No. 9094-18 PARCEL I Lot Eighteen (18), GATES KNOLL, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 33, page 56, public records of Pinellas County, Florida. PARCEL II A parcel in the Northeast 114 of the Northwest 114 of Section 23, Township 29 South, Range 15 East, further described as follows: Begin from the Southeast comer of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 23-29-15, also the intersection of centerlines of rights-of-way for Lake Avenue and Lakeview Road; run thence along the centerline of the said Lakeview Road right-of-way North 88° 59'34" West, 670.52 feet; thence North 00° 12'40" West, 50.00 feet for a Point of Beginning; thence run along the Northerly right-of-way line of the said Lakeview Road, North 88° 59'34" West, 173.16 feet; thence North 00° 10' 16" West, 258.30 feet; thence North 89° 57'57" East, 35.62 feet; thence South 76° 30'26" East, 141.29 feet; thence South 00° 12'40" East, 228.62 feet to the Point of Beginning. SURVEY of an Ingress/Egress easement in the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 23, Township 29 South, Range 15 East Further described as follows: Begin from the SE corner of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest114 of the said Section 23-29-15, also the intersection of right-of-way centerlines for Lake Avenue and Lakeview Road, and run thence along the right-of-way centerline of the said Lakeview Road, N 88° 59'34" West, 670.52 feet; thence N 00° 12'40" West, 50.00 feet to a point along the Northerly right-of-way line of the said Lakeview Road; thence along the centerline of SK YVIEW A VENUE, Per Gates Knoll S/D, Plat Book 33, Page 56 as recorded in the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, North 00° 12'40" West, 218.62 feet for a Point of Beginning; thence run North 80° 22' 27" West, 110.59 feet; thence along the arc of a curve to the right, R=50.00', D=50° 18'40.6", A= 43.90 feet, C=42.51 feet, CB=North 55° 13'06.7" West; thence North 89° 57'57" East, 6.47 feet; thence South 76° 3557.83" East, 141.29 feet; thence South 00° 12'40" East, 10.00 feet to the Point of Beginning. PARCEL III A portion of Lot 1. FORREST HILL ESTATES UNIT 5, according to the plat recorded in Plat Book 58, page 34, public records of Pinellas County, Florida being more particularly described as follows: Commence at the center of Section 23, Township 29 South, Range IS East and run along the North-South centerline of said Section 23, North 0° 21'39" West a distance of 1331.53 feet to the 40 Acre Line; thence along said 40 Acre Line, run North 88° 59' 34" West a distance of 670.52 feet; thence run North 0° 12' 40" West a distance of 50.00 feet to the North right-of-way line of Lakeview Road; thence along said right-of-way line, run North 88° 59'34" West a distance of 173.08 feet to the Point of Beginning; thence run North 0° 10' 16" West a distance of 67.00 feet; thence run North 88° 59'34" West a distance of 54.84 feet; thence run South 0° 02'03" East a distance of 44.00 feet; thence run North 88° 59'34" West a distance of 54.00 feet; thence run South 0° 02' 03" East a distance of 23.00 feet; thence run South 88" 59' 34" East a distance of 109 feet to the Point of Beginning. ALSO KNOWN AS: Lot 1, Block 1, KNIGHT & HARRIS, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 95, page 38 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, FLorida. Exhibit A Exhibit B BAR 122482 60r1227 12261224 155 1228 /� 6 69 67 r 64 9034 v 1232 84 J 1228_ _ _12?gL 1225 Son 55 n56 n 57 0 58 059 1236"- 86 Rev. 9/18/2017 1231 1238 1232156 I — --I TUSCOLA W 111 1238AF 881236 , 1235 1240A r— RD 45063 _� 1235 e 3 110 1242A I I 90 1239 5 5 o n n 1 n u•`i I fT' e ^ ' ' ' ' •411 4 W d 53 52 51 150 1 49' 47 1 46 —124 109 92 Y 1243 1246 1244 Q ------- • , 1240 r -M35— 1 4 «• :, ra ," - 5065 J t2$E" 158 8 1248 41 o * 'Y�f r 'Ji, u� S 1�. <4 '. 1247 _ 94 C 12506 " `"a 1235 " '; 1248 107 �1254A y • : a5os7 r �; .. :ILLINOIS"RD; :: ;•: ,': • : " ` 1251 159 1254 96 1256 1252 106 i35$a _ _ 4 — J ''"_ , • • • ,."+. .'.. : -. 12610 I I "�-T '..«+ .' " , "• ".. �. .•• , `."� .," ." �.';. V " 1256 1255 1260 98 1261 160 1260A ; - •: -• " " i •33 . 87,+, ✓S7> ;ad«`. Q9," •28: T --—� u�i}6+ 3�" 34.z - 105 1262 1269 3 1 L506$ 7705 1266 Q Q —'3� — — — — — — — — — 1235 Y FYI+O V. •"�• .'+'• "•" •^«HL T4 1268 m 1 104 68A Z RH i , 40 b. 4�a 42 N •"•23••m. •'i•,4 ao" .. "'5' • : 26:.ti :27 ; • ` aa'« ,i' ". '" 'R QG Z! a 3 161 1270 102 J = 1277 29034 2 r I OTTAWA' RD " •°� 101 0 L2 J "- 12851 "I 1.31 Ac 1e + '�S •.11..13,", , R. ",��" I,;a ; L �= f O O Ac o' f]l2.O 1 ^ 3 '1� •"•••+3,0 -4." «5"•" *fi'" "°J"•• "8 "• •9: 1 h LAKEVIEW RD s La 3950 J O L9034 J i )° V V 21 493 vE' �"..w�.�♦• "•'1l.s, •"o»'e h` i? �7 'je"� • " .e�"}•�}••' •."••a3.�3•r R" .. ':3f'6 N,+ / _ 13707 RIQG 8n0 2R 24 27 :2?io. :3t`11305 ., ."�' •^ 'O_"o ♦ :; F s�. •k zyol • :' 41 " :,r"s.,o 7 A ::•�' 3-, • mb 4st,R- :" •• p•.a.o ' . .' ":,}8 R."4• 1100 ".`�. - ,vm{+l.• � yam4." �'�'� ' �n tp.: .'� . r , .1f .',•� , �i.' .�i � $ . ��' VALENCIA;SF• RM •41Ef .t 1bjd f _-•!„ q: q *f"�. s .•YYi ±s �:•w Ir,}�9" R 5¢' •Sf. .52. '51' '54. ;5�'•". .�5. �/. 5� b9,'•' ,�9•M ;Gt' A. 61 •6r9•••. 08 •5N Be . Y5, �! " •`I y .6+8. i,�•' 1'A'111GERINE'ST �," »„„c,=• FUTURE LAND USE MAP LUP2017-09008 Owner(s): Spare Investors Realty, LLC Case: REZ2017-09008 Property Site: 1528 Lakeview Road 1.332 Size(Acres): Land Use Zoning PIN: 23-29-15-00000-210-0400 From: RL, RH LMDR, HDR To: R/OG O Atlas Page: 307A Exhibit B Kyle E. Brotherton 100 South Myrtle Avenue I Clearwater, FL 33756 (727) 562-4626 1 kyle.brotherton@myclearwater.com Education The Ohio State University, Graduated December 2013 • Bachelor of Science in City and Regional Planning Experience City of Clearwater Clearwater, FL I June 2014 - Present Senior Planner • Assist residents with annexing into the City, use appropriate software to track the workflow • Create various maps and models for the US 1.9 Plan, Downtown Plan update, and others • Research, review, and propose comprehensive plan and development code amendments • Process Land Use Map amendments and Zoning Atlas amendments • Lead City contact for the DEO Coastal Vulnerability Assessment and Adaptation Plan City of Bexley Bexley, OH I June 2013 -August 2013 Planning Intern • Created a redevelopment plan for the Livingston Avenue Area using InDesign, Photoshop, and SketchUp • Recommended policy changes, implementation steps, four development scenarios, and zoning changes • Predicted potential increases in tax revenue over current tax revenue for each scenario Skills Software: MS Office; Adobe CS: Photoshop, InDesign, Illustrator; Trimble: SketchUp; ESRI: ArcMap Planning: Complete Streets, Comprehensive Planning, Urban Planning, Mixed Use, Planned Unit Developments Projects US 19 Design Standards Clearwater Planning & Development Department, Clearwater, FL • Created numerous maps for public review and for the final zoning and design standards • Reviewed parcel level data and created lists for mailing and land use and zoning amendments • Constructed final document using InDesign; created frontage map using Illustrator Clearwater Downtown Plan and Zoning Standards Update Clearwater Planning & Development Department, Clearwater, FL • Reviewed plan and zoning district standards for potential updates and changes • Created new maps utilizing new City colors and style for integration into the Plan • Created models to visualize height and transitional requirements for areas along plan boundaries Personal Websites LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/kyle-brotherton/5a/306/a54 Organizations 0 APA Florida View looking north at the subject property 1528 Lakeview Road West of the subject property East of the subject property Across the street, to the south of the subject property View looking easterly along Lakeview Road View looking westerly along Lakeview Road LUP2017-09008 / REZ2017-09008 Spare Investors Realty LLC 1528 Lakeview Road --moiA !/NATE SLE R R BRIGHT AND BEAUTIFUL • BAYTO BEACH Case # LUP2017-09008 REZ2017-09008 SIGN POSTING ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I hereby acknowledge receipt of a public notice sign to post on property I own and/or represent that is being considered by the City of Clearwater for annexation, land use plan amendment and/or rezoning, and agree to post said sign on the subject property in a location where it is capable of being read from the most significant adjacent street a minimum of 10 days before the Community Development Board Meeting. Property Owner or Authorized Representative: �2�.� l 1c►'�S Z1G� Print Name Sign Name « 1 -7 Date Community Development Board Meeting Date: • November 21, 2017 City Council Public Hearing Dates: • January 18, 2018 (1St reading) • February 1, 2018 (2nd reading) The sign shall be posted on the property no later than: November 11, 2017 9 N.8839 34 1► 34 84'(8) FND I" IP N.88'58'16 W.. 54.82 (AI) LB #3889 .- wsoo FENCE _. (NG 11f 6- \ 67.16'(8) I WCa�00OF Q f OFF 0.1 .' ON 6:3FND 4'x4CM " `J].J•- - tnvERm AREA \ / 32.0• - - - - ' :-:g:e_- _ O W -85-5934-W. 97.16'(R) �- . ly\ \ / •N.88'S7 54�'N! 97 19'07 - ) SANITARY M.H. I \ / ,, CONca5 /w FND 1" IP I \ /•.. iE #3689 I PORTICO ': This property lies within Flood Zone X os depicted on Flood Insurance LOT 1, GATES KNOLL LEGEND: BM - Benchmark OR - Concrete Block CL - Centerline CM - Concrete Monument Elevation FND - Found IP - Iron Pipe IR - Iron Rod ASP - Asphalt Rate Map Community Panel # 12103C0109H Dated: 5-17-05 I LINE TABLE ELEV - LS# - Land Surveyor Registrctior Number A'/T - Ncil & TOO h' &D - Nail & Disk North CURVE TABLE Line 6eerine Distance M.N. - Manhole P.R.M. - Permcnent Reference Mor,ument R/VI - Right Of Way Concrete P.C. Point OF CF.C.C. e P.T. -Faint Of Tangent BENCHMARK: N0. RADIUS DELTA ARC TANGENT CHORD CHORD HEARING L7 h'.80'2227'W 710.59' CONC - Curve Ra iu Chord e P.R.C. -Faint Of Reverse Curvature F.C.C. - point -ii Comp Spike RAD. -Radius R.R.S. - Rcilrecd BASE FLOOD ELEVATION: b 7 50.00, 50'78'49" 43.97' 23.48' 42.57 h'.55'13'OTiN. L2 N.89'57'S7'E. 6.47' P.P. - Pcwer Pole W.M. - Water Meter pike R - Record D - Deed M -Measured C - Calcu'cted C.B. -Geed Book 5'tCTION- //jj 3 1 fC.- . L3 S.76'35'58'E. 741.29' L4 S.00.12'401E. 70.00' F.B. - Pict Beck O.R. - Officicl Record Bock PG - Page PVMT - Pavement P.O.B. Point Of Beginning P.O.C. Point Of Commencement CH.B. Chord Bearing L.L -TOWN.S'HIP-Z.��_rrANGE_ BASIS OF BEARINGS: CENTERLINE CF LAKEV'EW ROAD, BEING 5.88'59 34 E. R.P. - Radius Point CLF - Chain Link Fence P.C.P. - Permanent Control Point 0 ' -�- ... '. ..• i) .. . NAIL&DfSK """ P.J. - Point of Intersection PARCEL 1: I GENERAL NOTES: LOT 18, GATES KNOLL, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 33, .jI..., •' •':� '. L No instruments of record reflecting easements, rights-of-way, and/or ownership were PAGE 56, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY FLORIDA. FND NAIL DISC • :......::..:.: .:... 5LS #2 .: •:. .. ...:., , :. '. furnished, except as shown. 2. No foundations or underground improvements located except as shown. based on N.G.V.D. 1929 (MSL = 0.00'), : :.'... , J. If elevations are shown, such elevations are Except Pinellas County Where elevations are based on N.A.VD. 1988 (MSL = 0.00'). to PARCEL 2: NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 23, A PARCEL /N THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NTOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, Z 3 SCALE: 1 rr= 0 OF 4. Declaration is mode to original purchaser of the survey. It is not transferable institutions owners. RANGE 15 EAST FURTHER DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; BEGIN FROM THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE FND 1 " IP " FOINT.OF' • • .. . . '')' !... additional or subsequent 5, Surveyormodeinvestigation earcevidecoo oeasements a e e is oforecord, d tle search aw independent NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 23-29-15, ALSO THE INTERSECTION OF • '. S89'3T57 35.6 ' brahas , rship disclose. CENTERLINES OF RIGHTS-OF-WAY FOR LAKE AVENUE AND LAKEVIEW ROAD; RUN THENCE ALONG THE FND 4"x4" CM. 5.89'4224 34.92' FND NAIL &DISK LS #2512 that an accurate and current title search may 6. No water meters located except as shown. CENTERLINE of THE SAID LAKEVIEW ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY NORTH 88'59'34" WEST, 670.52 FEET• LS #7938 S�63026y 7. This Survey is prepared for the exclusive use of those parties certified herein and is valid for one (1) from Dote of Certification. THENCE NORTH 00"72'40" WEST 50.00 FEET FOR A POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE RUN ALONG THE N.89 -01'03 W 173.14'(M) year NORTHERLY Y L INE OF THE SAID LAKEVIEW , NORTH THENCE \ <I 5,6378E RJ ] .. ::.., 258,30 FEET' THENCE 7 40""EAST, T $1V CORNER of Lor T KNOLL 741.jj ..I .. y SOUTH 76'30' 2 EAST, 1.29 FEET,' THENCE SOUTH 00*12 228.62 FEET O THE POINT ,} (NO #) GARS - . _ . - I BEGINNING.1 \ RlN. EASEMENr _ \ F ND NAIL &DISK SURVEY OF AN INGRESS/EGRESS EASEMENT IN ThE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF � 512 LS #2 SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 75 EAST FURTHER DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS,- i warERva.vE I .. BEGIN FROM THE SE CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST 7/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 7/4 OF TriE SAID SECTION 23-29-15, ALSO HE INTERSECTION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY CENTERLINES FOR LAKE AVENUE AND LAKEVIEW I � - . ` ' OTTAWA ROAD (60 R/W) ROAD, AND RUN THENCE ALONG THE RIGHT-OF-WAY CENTERLINE OF THE SAID LAKEVIEW ROAD, NORTH THE 6' WOOD FENpE / 1 _ 88'5934" WEST 670.52 FEET' THENCE NORTH 00.12'40" WEST 50.00 FEET TO A PO/NT ALONG ql NN� q/ B 61NNI G OF � ''� �r �- NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE SAID LAKEVIEW ROAD; THENCE ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF I STORM DRAIN 6' wpoD FENCE R/W EASEMENT SKYV/EW AVENUE, PER GATES KNOLL SID, PLAT BOOK 33, PAGE 56, AS RECORDED IN THE PUBLIC IJ 2'CONC. CURB RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, NORTH 00'12'40" WEST, 278.62 FEET FOR A POINT OF I a ° c BEGINNING; THENCE RUN NORTH 80'2227" WEST 110.59 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE 1 g. W 0 RRE HYDRANT I TO THE RIGHT, RADIUS = 50.00 FEET, DELTA = 50'18'40.6", ARC = 43.90 FEET CHORD = 42.51 PgT/0 I DRAINAGE POND I I FEET CHORD BEARING = NORTH 55' 13'06.7" WEST' THENCE NORTH 89'ST57" EAST, 6.47 FEET BLOCK^ ^� I 1 :: '. 'FND NAIL. . fllsK' ' . _ K `l.: S.88159 34 E 96.89'(8) I I THENCE SOUTH 76'35'57.83" EAST, 141.29 FEET' THENCE SOUTH 00' 12'40" E4ST 10.00 FEET TO THE OF BEGINNING. / LS '2512 A. S.883547 E 97. 14'(M) I I FND 4x4" CAI POINT ' '�, •� 1 cONC. RETNNMENT will] I ' '_.__ :. SroRN INLET J0.0'(RJ 66.89(! // �/ `NO Tr) cu, ON O.5' PARCEL 3: A PORTION OF LOT 1, FORREST HILL ESTATES UNIT 5, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN PLAT 1�Nc. s W / BOOK 58, PAGE 34, PUBLIC RECORDS of PINELLAS COUNTY FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY io I f DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS,' ^ COMMENCE AT THE CENTER OF SECTICh 2 , TOWNSHIP 29 SCUTE, RANGE 75 EAST AN RUN ALONG O ' THE NORTH -SOUTH CENTERLINE OF SAID SECTION 23, NORTH 0'2139" WEST A DISTANCE OF 1331.53 Q _ TRANSNRMER I FEET TO TriE 40 ACRE LINE, THENCE ALONG SAID 40 ACRE LINE, RUN 59'34" WEST A o " " APPARENT ' LOT 7 8, GATES KNOLL.'.: DISTANCE OF 670.52 FEET; THENCE RUN I ORT DISTANCE F 50.00 FEET TO T�7E Z A/C UNITS - :. ' . ;VACANT0" .. ; . J ^ LOT 17, GATES KNOLL NORTH RIGhT OF -WAY LINE OF LAKEVIEW ROAD; THENCEALONGSAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, RUN NORTH 1 ON coNc _: •SK>'�!tEw O nj O 88'5934" WEST A DISTANCE OF 173.08 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE RUN NORTH AA: UNITS ON o"o, .R,,!V boN O 0 00'10'16" WEST A DISTANCE OF 67.00 FEET THENCE RUN NORTH 88'59'34" WEST A DISTANCE OF [� .._ TAX' AUIP% ASP. PVMT...': •:.•. Q /3 54 84 FEET HENCE RUN SOUTH 00'02'03" EAST A DISTANCE OF 44 00 FEET THENCE RUN NORTH RUN SOUTH 00 02'03" EAST A DISTANCE 0 F - - �- 1 LIGrr POST 4i 0) • 88'59'34" WEST A DISTANCE OF 54.00 FEET THENCE 23.00 FEET' THENCE RUN SOUTH 88.59'34" EAST A DISTANCE OF 709 FEET TO THE POINT OF O rX BEGINNING. 0 o ONE STORY MASONRY Po a h COMMERCIAL # 1528 ;... '>:' .. I . '� :: ' ':; ; ' . f. ,::' ::. ..:... ., ...' :: ' ::.'..::' ::.''. I Ui wood FENCE CFF O.d' N.8839 34 1► 34 84'(8) FND I" IP N.88'58'16 W.. 54.82 (AI) LB #3889 .- wsoo FENCE _. (NG 11f 6- \ 67.16'(8) I WCa�00OF Q f OFF 0.1 .' ON 6:3FND 4'x4CM " `J].J•- - tnvERm AREA \ / 32.0• - - - - ' :-:g:e_- _ O W -85-5934-W. 97.16'(R) �- . ly\ \ / •N.88'S7 54�'N! 97 19'07 - ) SANITARY M.H. I \ / ,, CONca5 /w FND 1" IP I \ /•.. iE #3689 I PORTICO ': LOT Z GATES KNOLL p-p_p,_pT'P.{�p_p_p P_p_p_p < ..,.. �TPr---P P P -P P' P-P-P-P-P-P_P-P_P_ ,P -F -P-P GUY AHCNOR h POWERLINEE Woos P.P. >> W000 P . E' . .. Po I nRE HroRA�r ZI LAKEVIEW ROAD (R/W WIDTH VARIES) _ _ - _ S.88.59'34'E. 670.52(8&M) ASP. PVMT. LINE LEGEND: CENTERLINE-- _ BOUNDARY LINE-� BUILDING LINE PLAT LOT LINE --a_ EASEMENT LINE_-� POWER LINE- _,_P- P -P-- WOOD FENCE CHAIN LINK FENCE -a . WIRE FENCE a. WATER1FLOOD_ZONE LINE BUILDING T/E(DIMENSION)-j REVISED: 1-3-06 (EASEMENT) MATCH LINE M I� S P.l. OF LAKEVIEW ROAD AND LAKE AVENUE I cV P.O.C. OF O PARCEL 2 & 2 - R/W EASEMENT SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 7/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 29S, RANGE P.O.C. OF 15E PARCEL 3 CENTER OF SECTION 23, MATCH LINE TOWNSHIP 28S, RANGE 15E l LOT 1, GATES KNOLL I i I' W lJ ". .. ,. ' ASP. PVMT. sm �'-iHlrr b .. .... .. .... .: .' .'..:. ..,: �..�.... ' PARCEL 3 _ 'STORM I'LLT;'. ; ,^o': �. . 0 ' -�- ... '. ..• i) .. . NAIL&DfSK """ �FND" . . . •: I : • .':...`. �.• ; .. LS #25.7_ . :.. .jI..., •' •':� '. FND NAIL DISC • :......::..:.: .:... 5LS #2 .: •:. .. ...:., , :. '. :� _ -... : :.'... , "aPOINT OF . . "o. FND 1 " IP " FOINT.OF' • • .. . . '')' !... BEGINNING OF PARCEL 2 • (NO #) OPEN BEGINNING . . .. I. • ,-: SIGN OF PARCEL 3 ISKrN . . CLF ON 0.3' h h 588'39;34' 109.00'(8) FND 1" 1P I_ : N.88'S934"lN. 173.16'(8) !. - (ND�2" IR I I 588'59.50' 108-90,(m) LB #3889 N.89 -01'03 W 173.14'(M) . .. BACKFLOW METER ] .. ::.., 'I I ^ FND 4"x4" CM $1V CORNER of Lor T KNOLL ..I .. y ,} (NO #) GARS - . _ . - I LOT Z GATES KNOLL p-p_p,_pT'P.{�p_p_p P_p_p_p < ..,.. �TPr---P P P -P P' P-P-P-P-P-P_P-P_P_ ,P -F -P-P GUY AHCNOR h POWERLINEE Woos P.P. >> W000 P . E' . .. Po I nRE HroRA�r ZI LAKEVIEW ROAD (R/W WIDTH VARIES) _ _ - _ S.88.59'34'E. 670.52(8&M) ASP. PVMT. LINE LEGEND: CENTERLINE-- _ BOUNDARY LINE-� BUILDING LINE PLAT LOT LINE --a_ EASEMENT LINE_-� POWER LINE- _,_P- P -P-- WOOD FENCE CHAIN LINK FENCE -a . WIRE FENCE a. WATER1FLOOD_ZONE LINE BUILDING T/E(DIMENSION)-j REVISED: 1-3-06 (EASEMENT) MATCH LINE M I� S P.l. OF LAKEVIEW ROAD AND LAKE AVENUE I cV P.O.C. OF O PARCEL 2 & 2 - R/W EASEMENT SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 7/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 29S, RANGE P.O.C. OF 15E PARCEL 3 CENTER OF SECTION 23, MATCH LINE TOWNSHIP 28S, RANGE 15E l FORWh„j PINELLAS P: (727) 464.8250 F: (727) 464.8212 forwardpinellas.org 310 Court Street Clearwater, FL 33756 May 11, 2018 Mayor George Cretekos City of Clearwater PO Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33756-4748 RE: May 8, 2018 CPA Follow-up for City of Clearwater Case CW 18-10 Dear Mayor Cretekos: At its May 8, 2018 meeting, the Board of County Commissioners, acting as the Countywide Planning Authority, took action to approve Case CW 18-10 which was initiated by your city. The ordinance associated with this action is attached. W Sinc,ey, B k,FA:ICP Executive Director Enclosure cc: Michael Delk, Director of Planning INTEGRATING LAID USE & TRANSPORTATION ORDINANCE NO. 18-19 (Corrected on May 15, 2018) AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE COUNTYWIDE PLAN MAP OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY ACTION ON CASE NUMBER CW 18-10 INITIATED BY THE CITY OF CLEARWATER AND TRANSMITTED TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS IN ITS CAPACITY AS THE COUNTYWIDE PLANNING AUTHORITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIAL ACT; PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENT TO THE PLAN; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR FILING OF THE ORDINANCE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, a proposed amendment to the Countywide Plan Map, which is an element of the Countywide Plan of Pinellas County, Florida, has been presented at a public hearing to the Board of County Commissioners in its capacity as the Countywide Planning Authority; and WHEREAS, notices of public hearings have been accomplished as required by Chapter 2012-245, Laws of Florida; and WHEREAS, procedures of the Special Act and County Charter have been followed concerning Forward Pinellas, in its role as the Pinellas Planning Council, and the Countywide Planning Authority, for the proposed amendment to the Countywide Plan; and WHEREAS, the City of Clearwater initiated a proposed amendment which was considered at a public hearing by Forward Pinellas, in its role as the Pinellas Planning Council, on April 11, 2018 with recommendations made by Forward Pinellas that are documented in the reports referred to as Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners in its capacity as the Countywide Planning Authority has conducted a public hearing and taken action that is documented by ordinance for approvals or partial approvals and partial denials and by resolution for denials, with both documents including the relevant Board reports as attached. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of Pinellas County, Florida, in its capacity as the Countywide Planning Authority, in regular meeting duly assembled on May 8, 2018 as follows: Section 1. Amending the Countywide Plan Map The Countywide Plan Map for Pinellas County adopted in Section 2 of Ordinance 15-30, as amended, is amended to reflect the changes adopted as follows: #CW 18-10 1.3 acres m.o.l., located at 1528 Lakeview Road, from Residential High (RH) and Residential Low Medium (RLM) to Office (0). Section 2. Severability. If any Section, Subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or provision of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by a Court of Competent Jurisdiction, such holding shall not be construed to render the remaining provisions of this Ordinance invalid or unconstitutional. Section 3. Filing of Ordinance; Effective Date. A certified copy of this ordinance shall be filed with the Secretary of State with the Ordinance and Exhibit A to be filed with the Clerk of the Circuit Court. This Ordinance shall take effect upon filing with the Department of State. APPROVED AS TO FORM By: '.-P ty Attorney 2 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINELLAS I, KEN BURKE, Clerk of the Circuit Court and Ex -officio Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners, in and for the State and County aforesaid, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an Ordinance adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Pinellas County, Florida, on May 8, 2018 relative to: ORDINANCE NO. 18-19 (Corrected on May 15, 2018) AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE COUNTYWIDE PLAN MAP OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY ACTION ON CASE NUMBER CW 18-10 INITIATED BY THE CITY OF CLEARWATER AND TRANSMITTED TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS IN ITS CAPACITY AS THE COUNTYWIDE PLANNING AUTHORITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIAL ACT; PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENT TO THE PLAN; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR FILING OF THE ORDINANCE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand and. official seal this May 15, 2018. C !s �'rittlT6t'L` KEN BURKE Clerk of the Circuit Court and .Ex -officio Clerk to the Board eof Country Commissioners orman D. Loy, Dep(jt� Clerk FORM,. MNELLAS P: (727) 464.8250 F: (727) 464.8212 forwardpinellas.org 310 Court Street Clearwater, F133756 April 13, 2018 William Horne, City Manager City of Clearwater PO Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 RE: Case CW 18-10 — City of Clearwater April 11, 2018 Forward Pinellas Meeting Follow-up Dear Mr. Horne: Forward Pinellas, in its role as the Pinellas Planning Council (PPC), considered and recommended approval at public hearing the application indicated above from the City of Clearwater for amendment of the Countywide Plan Map. The Board of County Commissioners acting pursuant to its Countywide Planning Authority (CPA), will now conduct the final public hearing on May 8, 2018. Thank you and your staff for your assistance in the coordination of our countywide planning process. Sinc r y, Whit Blanton, FAICP Executive Director Enclosure cc:•"Michael Delk, Planning Director J Spare Investors Realty, LLC Craig, A. Taraszki, Esq. INTEGRATING LAND USE & TRANSPORTATION April 11, 2018 6A4. Case CW 18-10 — City of Clearwater SUMMARY From: Residential High and Residential Low Medium To: Office Area: 1.3 acres m.o.l. Location: 1528 Lakeview Road FORWARD tPINELLAS Integrating land Use & Transportation This proposed amendment is submitted by the City of Clearwater and seeks to amend a property totaling approximately 1.3 acres from Residential High (used to depict areas that are primarily well-suited for high-density residential uses at a maximum density of 30 dwelling units per acre) and Residential Low Medium (used to depict areas that are primarily well-suited for suburban, low density or moderately dense residential uses at a maximum density of 10 dwelling units per acre) to Office (used to depict areas that are developed, or appropriate to be developed, with office uses, low -impact employment uses, and residential uses (subject to an acreage threshold), in areas characterized by a transition between residential and commercial uses and in areas well-suited for community -scale residential/office mixed- use development).This amendment qualifies as a Type A subthreshold amendment because it is less than five acres in size and meets the balancing criteria. The subject property contains a vacant medical clinic/office building. If approved, this amendment will be consistent with the City of Clearwater's Comprehensive Plan. FINDINGS Staff submits the following findings in support of the recommendation for approval: A. The Office category recognizes the proposed use of the site, and is consistent with the criteria for utilization of this category. B. The proposed amendment either does not involve, or will not significantly impact, the remaining relevant countywide considerations. Please see accompanying attachments and documents in explanation and support of these findings. LIST OF MAPS & ATTACHMENTS: Map 1 Locator Map Map 2 Site Map Map 3 Aerial Map Map 4 Current Countywide Plan Map Map 5 Proposed Countywide Plan Map MEETING DATES: Planners Advisory Committee, March 5, 2018 at 1:30 p.m. Forward Pinellas, April 11, 2018 at 1:00 p.m. Countywide Planning Authority, May 8, 2018 at 9:30 a.m. ACTION: Board, in its role as the Pinellas Planning Council, to recommend approval or denial of the requested amendment to the Countywide Planning Authority. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends to the board that it recommend approval of the requested amendment. ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: At its March 5, 2018 meeting, the Planners Advisory Committee voted 13-0 to accept this map adjustment. FORWARD PINELLAS BOARD RECOMMENDATION: The Board met on April 11, 2018 and voted 12- 0 to recommend approval of this amendment. IRABIN*PARKER ATTORNEYS AT LAW November 17, 2017 VIA E-MAIL: (gclayton@clearwater-fl.com) and REGULAR U.S. MAIL City of Clearwater Attn: Gina Clayton, Assistant Director 100 South Myrtle Ave Clearwater, Florida 33765 BENNETT L. RABIN MONIQUE E. PARKER 28059 U.S. HIGHWAY 19 NORTH, SUITE 301 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33761 727.475.5535 PHONE 0727.723.1131 FAX O WWW.RABINPARKER.COM Re: Kalmia Condominium No. 7, Inc. / Spare Investors Realty Inc., Zoning and Land Use Application Our Matter No.: 10231-001 Dear Ms. Clayton: This firm represents Kalmia Condominium No. 7, Inc. (the "Association"), and it is in this capacity that we have been authorized to communicate with you regarding Spare Investors Realty, Inc.'s applications to both rezone and amend the map designations for 1528 Lakeview Road, which abuts the Association's property. I have reviewed the proposed applications with the Association and they have a couple of concerns and/or objections to same. To begin, the purpose of this communication is to ensure that should these applications be approved, the only effect will be an alteration of the zoning and land use designations for the lot in which the medical office building actually sits. As it stands, the Association's property lies in the same zone and residential use designation (High Density Residential and Residential High, respectively) as the medical office, and the Association will object to any changes in their zoning and land use designations which result from an approval of applications submitted by an unrelated party. Additionally, the Association requests that any such approval(s) contain a condition which strictly limits the use of the building as a medical office, which has been its historical use. The Association has become aware that a change in zoning designation from High Density Residential to Office may allow the building to be used for other purposes (such as a funeral home or education facility, for example), and the Association will object to any approval which allows the building to be used for any other purpose which alters or diminishes the value and integrity of the condominium community. We understand that a meeting is currently scheduled to be held on November 21, 2017 for the review of the aforementioned applications. Upon the close of the meeting, please advise as to the outcome of same and if any additional meetings or hearings become scheduled in order to allow the Association the opportunity to attend and voice their concerns. We thank you for your anticipated courtesy and cooperation. Sincerely, en W. SWG cc: Kalmia Condominium Association, Inc., via e-mail RECEIVED NOV12017 11-21-17 OFFICIAt RECORDS DS A li LEGISLAT SMS DER To: Community Development Board 1 00 p. m. l 1 -2 -1 -17 -City of Clearwater Council Chamber From: Residents-Kalmia Condominium Association Building 5 1235; $. Highland Avenue, Clearwater, Fl. 33756 Earn a resident of KalmiaCondominium Association, Building 5, Unit 604, Ctearurater,'Florida, 33756, and T am speaking on my behalf and the behalf of a number of residents of the above- named condominium as we ogpose the City of Clearwater, Florida adopting the following ordinances.: ORDINANCE NO, 9094-I8 AN ORDINANCE OF'THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE COTuiPRENENSIVEPLAN OF THE.CITi TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGrNATION FOR 1.332 ACRES OF REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORT14 SIDE OF LAKEVIEW ROAD APPRoXIMATLEY 506 FEET EAST OF SOUTH HIGHLAND AVENUE, WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS. IS 1528 LAKEVIEW ROAD,, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756, FROM RESIDENTIAL LOW (RL) AND RESIDENTIAL HIGH(RH) TO RESIDENTIAL/OFFICE GENERAL. (R/OG); PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. ORDINANCE NO. 9095-48 AN' ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF THE CITY BY REZONING 1.3:32 ACRES OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTHSIDE OF LAKEVIEW ROAD APPROXIMAELY 500 FEET. EAST Of SOUTH HIGHLAND AVENUE,. WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS: 1518 LAKEVIEW ROAD, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: 33156, FROM LOW MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL. (LMDR) AND HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (HDR) TO OFFICE (0); PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. We are in opposition to the above; rezoning requests by Spare Investors Realty, LLC as these zoning changes. will adversely impact the integrity of our residential neighborhood with no benefit. to residents. Per the Zoning Atlas Amendment Application, submitted by Craig Taraszki, Esq. of Johnson Pope of St. Petersburg, Florida, he writes, `Based on available evidence, the existing building was constructed in 198$ under RM -38 zoning with a. special exception approval for use as a medical office building. Such use has continued for over 30 years, but would be considered non -conforming with the current HDR and LMDR zoning." Mr. Taraszki is correct that the building is non -conforming with current zoning. It was.used as a. medical :office. for a number of years, but it has not been usedfor this purpose for many years and has'been empty until approximately 3 weeks ago when a sign was posted with. thebusiness names of TJ Jerger MGA, Intercoastal Security & Holdings, West Point Underwriters and ATIC- American Tradition Insurance Company, and employees began to work there and park approximately 25 vehicles on the property at 1528 Lakeview Road which as noted .on the Plahnirig.and Community Development Board Staff report, is approximately 500 feet South of Highland Avenue. The. Staff reported that the -'10,196 square foot office building on the land parcel under discussion was emptyand, at this time, it is not. The staff report also states, "The building is currently listed for sale as a general ofce: I:t is important to note that neither medical. clinics nor oil_ices are listed perinitted.uses within the current residential zoning districts, consistent with the underlying future land. use categories."* Mr. Taraszki's statetnent on the Zoning Atlas Amendment Application is incorrect when stating the above building's use under RM -38 zoning with special exception approval for use as a medical office building has continued over.30 years.. The building has not been continuously occupied and used as a medical .office for this amount of time, as it has been empty for. many years, He wrote also on this application, "This rezoning would establish the historical office use as a legally conforming use. We take issue that this building has not had historical. off ice -use as. it has been vacant for a long period of time. The parcel :and building should .remain with its' present zoning and be developed as residential .property which conforms with all the properties .directly adjacent to it.and. near it. Any development of this property should be consistent with other properties. in the neighborhood. and be. partof the community and bring value to. residents living in that area. In answer to the responses to each of the six (6) standards. for review which Mr.. Taraszki .noted .in his application for Spare Investors Realty,..LLC, our comments are as.follow:s: 'Mr. Taraszki writes, " The proposed amendment is consistent with and furthers the goals and policies and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan... This.is not correct. *See statement by City ofClearwaterPlanning staff as noted above. Mi. Taraszki again discusses .30-'r years of the medical office building use and this is incorrect, and he discusses land use and density andintensity standards and Hierarchy of Places and shopping centers and;non-residential uses, ignoring that said. building and parcel is surrounded on all. sides by residential properties.. Katmia Building 5 and its' parking lot are less than 200 feet to the backside of the.property and building,. Kaimia Building 7 is.less than 50 feet .from one side of the building, with.the other side having a single-family residence less than 200feet from the parking lot of the parcel and the:front of the building faces primarily residential homes. The proposed FLU map' amendrrI t and rezoning will negatively impact the residential character of the neighborhood it. is directly adjacent to, in this area.. Major activity centers; destination points or multi - neighborhood shopping centers are not within 200..feet of this discussed property as are the. residences, arid. -in fact, are on Highland Avenue. and on the corners of Highland. Avenue and Lakeview which are not affected by this parcel being discussed at this time. Also this business of underwriters and other insurance eompanieswill not, as Mr. Taraszki states provide services to nearby residences as a large amount of the said insurance businesses is in mobile homes,. which do not exist in this area, and no employment. opportunities are available to. residents. as the companies came to the property with their present employees. Sothis point made by Mr.. Taraszki is moot, As far asthe.businesses contributing -to the community in other ways; we do. not see this. happening. The employees.will arrive at work in the early morning, -leave in the evening and not participate in any. way in. our community, not even to support our local businesses.. They will not. volunteer in. our community or provide any foreseeable benefit. to. the residents of this area. The..existing character of 'the neighborhood which we: want to protect has two, very large, very well-maintained.:over-fifty five, age condominium residences. Kalmia condominium has existed for more -than 40 years and is a historical part.ofthis area of Clearwater. The other condominium is very. attractive and up -scale looking and .is less than 15 years old and. completely occupied. The restof the neighborhood is'comprised of residential homes, two -elder -care facilities, a large; community, well -used, Y.M.C.A, and all .offices, strip=malt and commercial and. retail establishments are appreciated and supported..by the community,. but these. establishments are relegated to Highland Avenue with .three, additional businesses on the corners of Highland and Lakeview, There has 'been a recent movement to improve the strip -mail and it has: been undergoing attractive renovations and the vacant stores are lessening and across the streei.from this.mall, the. oficebuilding has also been renovated and increased rentals. are occurring on this property- We, in the neighborhood, support these establishments and hope to see more businesses in the area succeed, and we support Highland Avenue as the commercial area of this neighborhood, keeping the residential areas intact and empty parcels and buildings used for housing. needs of our loved community. While we welcome the businesses to Clearwater and recognize their valued contribution to our city, we believe their best interests would be better. realized in an area that is zoned for offices and/or commercial and retail establishments. To change:zoning of this parcel is not for the public good of our Clearwater community and it would damage the character of the neighborhood and not fit our needs. We respectfully ask that the Clearwater Communi ty.Development Board and City of Clearwater Commission deny the rezoning of the area discussed here. Thank you for the consideration of our proposal as we.are the community members. directly bordering this parcel,. and the .residents most affected. Wealso. look forward .to. continuing. to work together with all people in Clearwater to improve our beautiful city. Marsh Sinon-Cohen. and other residents ofKalmia Condominium Complex.. Building 5 123.5 S. Highland Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33.756 11-21-17 Zoning Photo Addendum -Lakeview Zoning.Change Denial., Request -MS -Cohen 1. Trash in back, of building. No dumpster on property. .2. Employees smoking in back of office building next to. Kalmia 5,Parking lot. 3.. Close up..of employees smoking in back of office building, d. Wire with moss used as barrier fencing on Ottawa side of property. 5.. Office parking lotwith.25 vehicles parked. 6. Kalmia 7 building:10 feet from east side of.office building 7. Office building,south:side-- Ottawa Street merging into. residential area.: � y. .. . w§�� .\�� ..«��« y a � �� « . �� , » ° � ^°�- »«w 6 MAIM a.? _ � p fill g ^ Y'a ' IFF lot _�, - Kw Y t ' .. , t 'n k IFF lot _�, - Kw Y t ' .. , gg I'M MK�