The URL can be used to link to this page

LUP2017-10011�CLEARWATER Planning & Development Department Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application � eekerN.veratmnn.•urmaacaj Including Future Land Use Map Amendments ALL APPLICATIONS ARE TO BE FILLED OUT COMPLETELY AND CORRECTLY, AND SUBMITTED IN PERSON (NO FAX OR DELIVERIES) TO THE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY NOON ON THE SCHEDULED DEADLINE DATE. ONE (1) COMPLETE SET OF APPLICATION MATERIALS AS REQUIRED WITHIN IS TO BE SUBMITTED DIGITALLY (COMBINED INTO A SINGLE PDF FILE ONTO A CD/DVD/USB DRIVE) FOR REVIEW BY THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE. SUBSEQUENT SUBMITTAL FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD WILL REQUIRE 11 COMPLETE SETS OF APPLICATION MATERIALS PRINTED (1 ORIGINAL AND 10 COPIES) AND ONE (1) COMBINED DIGITAL COPY IN A MANNER CONSISTENT WITH THE ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL. PLANS AND APPLICATIONS ARE REQUIRED TO BE COLLATED, STAPLED AND FOLDED INTO SETS. IT IS INCUMBENT UPON THE APPLICANT TO SUBMIT COMPLETE AND CORRECT INFORMATION. ANY MISLEADING, DECEPTIVE, INCOMPLETE OR INCORRECT INFORMATION MAY INVALIDATE YOUR APPLICATION. THE APPLICANT, BY FILING THIS APPLICATION, AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE. APPLICATION FEE: $885 Future Land Use Map Amendment only, includes Zoning Atlas Amendment $0 Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment APPLICATION TO AMEND: X FUTURE LAND USE MAP (select one) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (TEXT) PROPERTY OWNER (PER DEED): Rental Houses, LLC MAILING ADDRESS: 300 S. Duncan Ave., Suite 275, Clearwater, FL 33755 PHONE NUMBER: 727-461-7700 EMAIL: dee __tparentalhouses.com AGENT OR REPRESENTATIVE: Brian J. Aungst, Jr., Esq. Macfarlane Ferguson & McMullen MAILING ADDRESS: 625 Court Street, Suite 200, Clearwater, FL 33757 PHONE NUMBER: 727-441-8966 EMAIL: boaamacfar.com ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY (if applicable): 300 S. Duncan Ave., Clearwater, FL 33755 PARCEL NUMBER(S): PID 14-29-15-00000-130-0200 (northern portion only) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See attached for legal description. DESCRIPTION OF TEXT AMENDMENT (if applicable): N/A Specifically identify the requested amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567 Page 1 of 5 Revised 10/05/2016 Y Planning & Development Department C`'k"'V/k-ER Comprehensive Flan Amendment Application Including Future Land Use Map Amendments PLEASE ENSURE THAT THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS FILLED OUT, IN ITS ENTIRETY. FAILURE TO COMPLETE THIS FORM WILL RESULT IN YOUR APPLICATION BEING FOUND INCOMPLETE AND POSSIBLY DEFERRED UNTIL THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION CYCLE. FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATION PRESENT: _R/0G (Residential / Office General) REQUESTED: CG (Commercial General) COUNTYWIDE PLAN MAP CATEGORY PRESENT: Office REQUESTED: Retail and Services ZONING DISTRICT PRESENT. O REQUESTED: C SITE AREA: FLU change 122,459 sq. ft. FLU change 2.811 acres (Total site = 3.196 acres) A L MAXIMUM I DEN TE�[�{4QS� : USE(S): Current/Existing Existing (currently on site Future land Use(s):61 22_9 .gsf or previous use if vacant): 70,855 gsf Office Proposed Future Proposed (new use, if any; Land Use(s): 67,352 gsf (80,822 gsf w/TDR) plus existing if to remain): Self storage with ancillary retail (units, rooms or beds per acre or non- residential square footage) FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATIONS FOR ALL ADJACENT PROPERTY: North: RU (Residential Urban, across street) South: CG (Commercial Generali East: CG (Commercial General) West: CG (Commercial General) and R/OG (Residential / Office General) STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. -,,�y. Swomto and subscribed before me this ;2! _ day of mI c> r,nl,.ef` . ;2b 0 to me and/or by -1. 40. - f/ A_.,�Ijproduced' personally k�p as ////j,_ , — a identification. of property ow &( or represeritar i jpz My commission —f,Ay.r40MFA4SSiON.9'i f_L�_K45 EXPIRES July 29, 2018 Planning & Development Department,100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727662-4567 Page II of 6 Revised 10/05/2016 Planning & Development Department �CLEARWATER Comprehensive Plan Amendment Standards for Review PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO EACH OF THE SIX (6) STANDARDS FOR REVIEW EXPLAINING HOW, IN DETAIL, THE CRITERION IS BEING COMPLIED WITH PER THIS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT. 1. The amendment will further implementation of the comprehensive plan consistent with the goals, policies and objectives contained in the plan. See attached for response. 2. The amendment is not inconsistent with other provisions of the comprehensive plan. The amendment is consistent with and furthers the implementation of comprehensive plan, and is consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives contained in the plan by redeveloping the property consistent with the commercial redevelopment pattern of Gulf to Bay Blvd. 3. The available uses, if applicable, to which the property may be put are appropriate to the property in question and compatible with existing and planned uses in the area. The existing uses to the east, south, and west are all commercial along Gulf to Bay Blvd. 4. Sufficient public facilities are available to serve the property. Compared to the existing office on the property, the proposed use of self storage will generate less traffic and consume less water and sanitary capacity. 5. The amendment will not adversely affect the natural environment. The proposed self storage development will have less impervious area than the existing office development. The stormwater management system also will be upgraded to meet current standards. There are no wetlands or other sensitive environmental features on the property. 6. The amendment will not adversely impact the use of property in the immediate area. Compared to the existing office on the property, the proposed use of self storage facility will eliminate all traffic flow to Rainbow Drive and provide an enhanced buffer for the single-family residential lots to the north. The secured, enclosed design of the facility will also have a significant, positive impact on vagrancy on the property. Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567 Page 4 of 5 Revised 10/05/2016 Planning & Development Department Comprehensive Plan Amendment —�a�rrr,r�a�,Ura�-B,��a�►�, Affidavit to Authorize Agent/Representative 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed —PRINT full names: _Rental Houses LLC By: Barrett Family Partnership I, LTD, its Manager B: Mm ,je , its enera Partner () property: 2. That I am we are the owner(s)and record title holders of the followingdescribed 300 S. Duncan Ave.. Clearwater FL 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for (describe request): For the north portion of therp opert , change Future Land Use designation to Commercial General and Zoning to Commercial District (the southern portion already has these designations). 4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: Jonathan Dorman StorCon Development, LLC as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. That (1/we).nthe unciersjgLied authority, hereby certify�that the foregoing is true and correct. Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS BEFORE ME THE UNDERSIGNED, AN/OFFICER DULY COMMISSIONED BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, 0 THIS � -b ;DAY OF 7�ri ./3 �• .I b 1-7 0 ARP€A' WHO HAV G BEEN FI SWORN DEPOSED AND SAYS THAT HE/SHE FULLY UNDERSTANDS THE CONTENTS OF THE AFFIDAVIT THAT HE/SHE SIGNED. I CORNELIUS My Commission jMY COMMISSION #FF146045 Notary Seal/Stamp Expires: 7 _ on a o ary rvioe.00m w i+nin®R ggu &pnv�ti! PippAK9tiAhl, 140 S. My#rrtid Adenuo, Clearwater, FL 38769, Tel: 7117-GO-3bb7 Page 6 of 5 Ravlsed 10/05/2016 Planning & Development Department - A PIA/A-MU Comprehensive Plan Amendment . 1T9'* ... BRIGHTATIDBFAUSB.•BAY71D8EACH Affidavit to Authorize Agent/Representative 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed —PRINT full names: Rental Houses LLC By: Barrett Family Partnership 1, LTD, its Manager y: gm rle , its ( en3ra Partner () property: p y 2. That I am/we are) the owners an recordtitle holders of the followingdescribed ro ert: 300 S. Duncan Ave., Clearwater FL 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for (describe request): For the north portion of the property, change Future Land Use designation to Commercial General and Zoning to Commercial District (the southern portion already has these designations). 4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: Brian J. Aungst, Jr., Esq. Macfarlane Ferguson & McMullen as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. That (I/we), t ndersigned uthority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. Pr rtyOwner 7 r Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS BEFORE ME THE UNDERSIGNED, AN OFFICER DULY COMMISSIONED BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, ON THIS _ 2. LL ' 1 DAY OF !�j O:y.14 r 2 o 1 . PERSONALLY APPEARED WHO HAVING BEEN FIRST DULY SWORN DEPOSED AND SAYS THAT HE/SHE FULLY UNDERSTANDS THE CONTENTS OF THE AFFIDAVIT THAT HE/SHE SIGNED. Not Public Signature My Commission Notary Seal/Stamp Expires: CHERYL J CONISIELIU11 j" Y COMMISSION #FF146"5 Pmnntng a gg�rg[dQrnrnt 94�sr!#m i!±t, '144 S. Myrtle Avon us, ClearwL ater, F ' �! �F�y July 20, Zola Page 5 of 5 SECTION 14 TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH RANGE 15 EAST li PINELLAS COUNT,' FLORIDA I_2T � Ll ' +-Q�-',,;,. '� — •'�' �,- y.,..v,.>am Lam'' — _ — — — — — -«>L--dwI s e rs ��'� ttf .l•— •�I,1 i 1 f 1 1 1 I I I I 1 at. NI 1 1 1 - do. FIs .1 01, Im I I I 1+1 y i . �,y iA as.-pru iw � ♦ � t.r LJ It Ij ItW l •I 1 1 W WEP I l l t l l 11 - F .r•' °"^" w s 1 i C 111.000�I -1. �,!� iilli�liiili.tillik�li i�iiieiiliiAT � ii�li 11�{i�•i Iiiii�' iil' �✓��A> �-" � _Y ..:`_Lj r i 1 I#: 2012004993 BK: 1"14 PG: 347, 01/06/2012 at 01:29 PM, F--IRDING 1 PAGES $10.00 D DOC STAMP ,ECTION $0.70 KEN BURKE, CLERK OF C PINELLAS COUNTY, FL BY DEPUTY —ERK: CLKDMC4 ep , -' ITCLAIM DEED •Returri t6: Enclosed self addressed stamped envelope Name: J B Management, Inc. Address: 300 S. Duncan Ave. Suite 275 F ; Clearwater, FL 33755 This instrument Prepared by: Erika L. Barrett Proparty Appraisers Parcel Identification (Folio) Number(s): 14/29/15/00000/130/0200 Legal.Description. THIS QUITCLAim b#ED, Executed this 23n° day of December, 2011, by first party Erika L. Barrett as Trustee' of the i 4a L. Barrett Living Trust whose post office address is 300 S. Duncan Ave., Suite 175, Clearwater, FL 33755 to second party, Rental Houses, LLC whose post office address is 300 S. Duncan Ave., Suite 275, Clearwater, FL 33755. Legal Description:_ Frqm'$Corner of SW 'h of NE '% run W 393 ft(s) and N 50 Feet from POB then W 60 feet then N 588.5 Feet, then E 396.14 Feet, then S 309.5 Feet, then W 335.65 Feet, then S 280 Feet to POB continue 3.21 AC (C) thereof as recorded in Plat Book 8935, Page 271 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. WITNESSETH, That the said first party,, fora 41n consideration of the sum of $10.00, in hand paid by the said second party, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, does hereby remise, release and quit -claim unto the said second party forever, all the right, title, interest, claim and demand which the said first party has In and to the following described lot, piece or parcel of land, situate, lying and being in the County of Pinellas, State of Florida, to wit: To Have and to Hold, the same together 0i fi all and sl' gular the appurtenances thereunto belonging or in anywise appertaining, and all theestaie, right, title, Interest, lien, equity and claim whatsoever of the said first party, either in law or equity, to the only proper use, benefit and behoove of the said second party forever.' IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The said first pa"s signed anii sealed these presents the day and year first above written. , Signed, sealed and delivered in presence of: Witness AQ2tJ S�I2Um First Party Witness `- Second Party f ' 1� ivraT�c I STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OFPINELLAS t I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day, before me, an officer duly authorized in the'State aforesaid and in the County aforesaid to take acknowledgments, personally appeared Erika L. Barrett (personally known), being duly sworn, and) to me known to be the person the person describe in and who executed the foregoing instrument and who take an oatti..l t'> WITNESS my hand and official seal in the County and State last aforesaid this 231-° ;day of December., 2011. - My Commission Expires: 3/28/2015 VMUM M. BANC Maury Mlle - Noflloucl Notary Public ' 111 Co— 8*0 MlC"Wft" i a um SECTION 14 TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH RANGE 15 EAST PINELLAS COUNTY FLORIDA I I I., Ud Lo J 01 Fo I 1 1.01 tj I V11 A I I I I., Ud Lo J 01 Fo r 0* La R X Id n BMJ ix. LUP2017-10011 - Gulf to Bay Self Storage Responses to Comprehensive Plan Amendment Standards for Review The comprehensive land use amendment furthers the goals, objectives, and policies of the Comprehensive Plan by providing a sufficient variety and amount of future land use categories and accommodating public demand and promoting infill redevelopment. See Goal A.2. The amendment will allow for the development of a self -storage facility subject of the contemporaneously filed FLD2017-09018. The project will be a commercial land use and shall be located at the intersection of arterial or collector street (Gulf to Bay Blvd.) and will be sited in such a way as to minimize the intrusion of off-site impacts into residential neighborhoods. See Policy A.2.2.8. The project will provide for safe on- site traffic circulation and connections to adjacent arterial and collector streets consistent with Florida Department of Transportation, Institute of Traffic Engineers design guidelines, and other applicable roadway design standards, policies, and guidelines. See Policy A.2.2.11. The redevelopment will meet the safety, environmental, and aesthetic needs of the city pursuant to Goal A.3. The redevelopment will be supported by the available community and public facilities that are required to serve the development pursuant to Goal A.4. The redevelopment will support the character of the surrounding commercial properties consistent with Policies A.5.3 and A.5.4. The redevelopment will promote high quality design standards that support Clearwater's image and contribute to its identity consistent with Policy A.5.5. The redevelopment is innovative planned development that accomplishes infill development that is consistent and compatible with the surrounding environment pursuant to Policy A.6.2. The existing uses to the east, south, and west are all Commercial General. The uses to the north are LMDR. The subject site is currently a mixed use of Commercial General and Residential/Office General. The amendment will make the site's use consistent with the surrounding uses that front Gulf to Bay and abut Rainbow Drive. Page 1 of 1 SKETCH & DESCRIPTION A parcel of land in the SW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 14, Township 29 South, Range 15 East, Pinellas County, Florida, further described as follows: Start at the SE corner of the SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 14, Township 29 South, Range 15 East, and go N 01 degrees 11'31" W, along the 40 acre line, 50.14 feet; thence go N 88 degrees 47'06" W, 58.31 feet to the point of intersection of the West right-of-way line of Duncan Avenue and the North right-of-way line of Gulf to Bay Boulevard; thence N 00 degrees 33'28" W, along the West right-of-way line of Duncan Avenue, 280.00 feet to the Point of Beginning of this description; thence N 88 degrees 47'06" W, 395.63 feet; thence N 00 degrees 39'25" W, 308.52 feet to a point on the South right-of-way line of Rainbow Drive; thence S 88 degrees 56'09" E, along the South right-of-way line of Rainbow Drive, 396.14 feet to a point of intersection with the West right-of-way line of Duncan Avenue; thence S 00 degrees 3328" E, along the West right-of-way line -of Duncan Avenue 309.54 feet to the Point of Beginning. CONTAINING: 2.811 ACRES. MORE OR LESS. 1. BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF GULF TO BAY BOULEVARD, HAVING A GRID BEARING OF NORTH 88'43'42" WEST. 2. THERE MAY BE ADDITIONAL EASEMENTS, RESTRICTIONS, AND/OR MATTERS NOT SHOWN ON THIS SURVEY WHICH MAY BE FOUND IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF THIS COUNTY. 3. THIS SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER. 4. THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY. 5. BEARINGS AND DISTANCES ARE MEASURED AND RECORDED (R). SKETCH & LEGAL DESCRIPTION PROPOSED REZONING PARCEL 00A9 M &MIA NC. 111 FOREST LAKES BOULEVARD OLDSMAR. FLORIDA 34677 �n BOUNDARY -TOPOGRAPHIC -CONSTRUCTION STAKEOUT I LB PH: (813) 854-1342 SI. VEYOTAMPABAY.tRCOM, SHEET 1 4F 2 SURVEYOR'S I hereby certify that the SKET( hereon was prepared under my date(s) shown, and meets the: forth by the FLORIDA BOARD '0 MAPPERS In Chapter SJ -17, Ft pursuant to Section 472.027;-j KELLY O.WcCLUNG _1/ PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR and MAPPER ) 4 ADMINIS //�y� •CODE ; fA STATO S' `1 e S 13-1 L UI .......• WE �d • L ANS SKETCH & DESCRIPTION 0 S88 -56'09"E 396.14' (R) S880 53' 14"E 396.64' ozvz N88'47'06"W z L o 10 o a A 58.31' (R) w Q o o N880 47' 16"W Cc N N 58.19' GULF -TO -BAY BOULEVARD N 1 '11 ' 31 " W (R) N010 07'39"W---""1--40 acre line 50.14' % POINT OF COMMENCEMENT (NOT FOUND)-' SE CORNER OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST SKETCH & LEGAL DESCRIPTION PROPOSED REZONING PARCEL MAST LAND SURVE K NC. 111 FOREST LAKES BOULEVARD OLDSMAR. FLORIDA 34677 Le 4m BOUNDARY -TOPOGRAPHIC -CONSTRUCTION STAKEOUT PH: (813) 854-1342 S AIRVEYOTAMPABAY.RRAM SHEET 2 OF 2 SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINvro ;00 n op OF RAINBOW DRIVE w N O 00 M u- WO o t4-) of W > > = zz W M 00 - W 00 N N bo PORTION TO BE REZONED 00 M O Z Z LoLo O O 00 r) M POINT OF BEGINNING 395.63' N88'47'06"W (R) 395.82' N880 46'54"W ozvz N88'47'06"W z L o 10 o a A 58.31' (R) w Q o o N880 47' 16"W Cc N N 58.19' GULF -TO -BAY BOULEVARD N 1 '11 ' 31 " W (R) N010 07'39"W---""1--40 acre line 50.14' % POINT OF COMMENCEMENT (NOT FOUND)-' SE CORNER OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST SKETCH & LEGAL DESCRIPTION PROPOSED REZONING PARCEL MAST LAND SURVE K NC. 111 FOREST LAKES BOULEVARD OLDSMAR. FLORIDA 34677 Le 4m BOUNDARY -TOPOGRAPHIC -CONSTRUCTION STAKEOUT PH: (813) 854-1342 S AIRVEYOTAMPABAY.RRAM SHEET 2 OF 2 w ^ z W Z �M w u- WO o t4-) U z = zz Q ozvz N88'47'06"W z L o 10 o a A 58.31' (R) w Q o o N880 47' 16"W Cc N N 58.19' GULF -TO -BAY BOULEVARD N 1 '11 ' 31 " W (R) N010 07'39"W---""1--40 acre line 50.14' % POINT OF COMMENCEMENT (NOT FOUND)-' SE CORNER OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST SKETCH & LEGAL DESCRIPTION PROPOSED REZONING PARCEL MAST LAND SURVE K NC. 111 FOREST LAKES BOULEVARD OLDSMAR. FLORIDA 34677 Le 4m BOUNDARY -TOPOGRAPHIC -CONSTRUCTION STAKEOUT PH: (813) 854-1342 S AIRVEYOTAMPABAY.RRAM SHEET 2 OF 2 L October 6, 2017 Ms. Lauren Matzke, AICP, Manager City of Clearwater Planning & Development 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 Re: LUP2017-10011 (Comprehensive Plan Amendment), and REZ2017-10012 (Zoning Atlas Amendment) Gulf to Bay Self Storage, 300 S. Duncan Avenue Dear Ms. Matzke: We are writing in response to your letter of Incompleteness for the subject application, dated October 4, 2017. A listing of your comments and our responses (in italics) is provided below: Comprehensive Plan Amendment 1. Legal Description: Confirm the legal description listed on Page 1 of the application is only for that portion of the parcel requested to be amended (application states 2.811 acres). Response: The application has been revised to reference the supplemental sketch and description of only the area to be amended. 2. Property Designations: Because only a portion of the site is proposed to be amended, "present" designations on Page 2 of the application should list only the designation on that portion or the parcel. The present and requested Countywide Plan Map category is not listed. 2.811 acres site area is 122,447 SF, which differs from what is listed on the application — confirm all calculations and acreage match. Current allowable density / intensity should not include the additional development potential from the requested TDR; please include GSF both with and without the proposed TDR under proposed. Response: The application has been revised to show the present designation of only the area to be amended, and the Countywide Plan Map designations have been added. 122,459 SF is the correct parcel area, which equals 2.811 acres when rounded to the nearest thousandth of an acre. The GSF figures have been revised as requested. 3. Response to review standard 1 regarding consistency with the City's Comprehensive Plan does not reference any goals, objectives or policies of the Plan. Response to review standard 3 does not address 8437 Tuttle Ave, #412, Sarasota, FL 34243 (813) 310-8520 (813) 436-5466 Fax jon.dorman(a)hotmail.com [!TORCO!NVELOPMM, ru Gulf to Bay Self Storage, October 6, 2017 the uses on South Duncan Avenue or Rainbow Drive, on which the proposed amendment area is located. Response: The application has been revised to incorporate the following: The comprehensive land use amendment furthers the goals, objectives, and policies of the Comprehensive Plan by providing a sufficient variety and amount of future land use categories and accommodating public demand and promoting infill redevelopment. See Goal A.2. The amendment will allow for the development of a self -storage facility subject of the contemporaneously filed FLD2017-09018. The project will be a commercial land use and shall be located at the intersection of arterial or collector street (Gulf to Bay Blvd.) and will be sited in such a way as to minimize the intrusion of off-site impacts into residential neighborhoods. See Policy A. 2.2.8. The project will provide for safe on- site traffic circulation and connections to adjacent arterial and collector streets consistent with Florida Department of Transportation, Institute of Traffic Engineers design guidelines, and other applicable roadway design standards, policies, and guidelines. See Policy A.2.2.11. The redevelopment will meet the safety, environmental, and aesthetic needs of the city pursuant to Goal A.3. The redevelopment will be supported by the available community and public facilities that are required to serve the development pursuant to Goal A.4. The redevelopment will support the character of the surrounding commercial properties consistent with Policies A.5.3 and A.5.4. The redevelopment will promote high quality design standards that support Clearwater's image and contribute to its identity consistent with Policy A.5.5. The redevelopment is innovative planned development that accomplishes infill development that is consistent and compatible with the surrounding environment pursuant to Policy A. 6.2. The existing uses to the east, south, and west are all Commercial General. The uses to the north are LMDR. The subject site is currently a mixed use of Commercial General and Residential/Office General. The amendment will make the site's use consistent with the surrounding uses that front Gulf to Bay and abut Rainbow Drive. 4. The survey provided is for the entire parcel, but does not delineate the portion of the parcel proposed to be amended or provide a legal description of said portion. A sketch and legal description to supplement the parcel survey should be provided. Response: The requested supplemental sketch and legal description are enclosed. 5. It is not necessary to provide a survey for the parcel associated with the TDR application as part of this application. Response: Noted. Page 2 of 5 [ISTORCO!N Gulf to Bay Self Storage, October 6, 2017 VUOFK M uc Zoninq Atlas Amendment 1. Legal Description: Confirm the legal description listed on Page 1 of the application is only for that portion of the parcel requested to be amended (application states 2.811 acres). Response: The application has been revised to reference the supplemental sketch and description of only the area to be amended. 2. Property Designations: Because only a portion of the site is proposed to be amended, "present" designations on Page 2 of the application should list only the designation on that portion. 2.811 acres site area is 122,447 SF, which differs from what is listed on the application — confirm all calculations and acreage match. Current allowable density / intensity should not include the additional development potential from the requested TDR; please include GSF both with and without the proposed TDR under proposed. Response: The application has been revised to show the present designation of only the area to be amended. 122,459 SF is the correct parcel area, which equals 2.811 acres when rounded to the nearest thousandth of an acre. The GSF figures have been revised as requested. 3. The application did not include page 4 response to review standards; consider previous comments regarding the application for Comprehensive Plan Amendment where applicable, for the appropriate Zoning Atlas amendment criteria. Response: The application has been revised to incorporate the following: 1. The proposed amendment is consistent with and furthers the goals, policies and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan and furthers the purposes of the Community Development Code and other City ordinances and actions designed to implement the Plan in the following ways: The zoning atlas amendment furthers the goals, objectives, and policies of the Comprehensive Plan by providing a sufficient variety and amount of future land use categories and accommodating public demand and promoting infill redevelopment. See Goal A.2. The amendment will allow for the development of a self -storage facility subject of the contemporaneously filed FLD2017- 09018. The project will be a commercial zoning and shall be located at the intersection of arterial or collector street (Gulf to Bay Blvd.) and will be sited in such a way as to minimize the intrusion of off-site impacts into residential neighborhoods. See Policy A.2.2.8. The project will provide for safe on-site traffic circulation and connections to adjacent arterial and collector streets consistent with Florida Department of Transportation, Institute of Traffic Engineers design guidelines, and other applicable roadway design standards, policies, and guidelines. See Policy A.2.2.11. The redevelopment will meet the safety, environmental, and aesthetic needs of the city pursuant Page 3 of 5 STORCON DEYCiAPIdEl1l, u�c Gulf to Bay Self Storage, October 6, 2017 to Goal A.3. The redevelopment will be supported by the available community and public facilities that are required to serve the development pursuant to Goal A.4. The redevelopment will support the character of the surrounding commercial properties consistent with Policies A.5.3 and A.5.4. The redevelopment will promote high quality design standards that support Clearwater's image and contribute to its identity consistent with Policy A.5.5. The redevelopment is innovative planned development that accomplishes infill development that is consistent and compatible with the surrounding environment pursuant to Policy A.6.2. 2. The available uses to which the property may be put are appropriate to the property which is subject to the proposed amendment and compatible with existing and planned uses in the area. The existing uses to the east, south, and west are all Commercial General. The uses to the north are LMDR. The subject site is currently a mixed use of Commercial General and Residential/Office General. The amendment will make the site's use consistent with the surrounding uses that front Gulf to Bay and abut Rainbow Drive. This site will be developed as a self -storage facility which is the subject of the contemporaneously filed FLD 2017-09018. 3. The amendment does not conflict with the needs and character of the neighborhood and city. The zoning is consistent with the commercial redevelopment pattern of Gulf to Bay Blvd. The project is design as to mitigate the impact on the residential street to the north and will not conflict with the needs or character of the surrounding properties. 4. The amendment will not adversely or unreasonably affect the use of other property in the area. Compared to the existing office on the property, the proposed use of self -storage facility will eliminate all traffic flow to Rainbow Drive and provide an enhanced buffer for the single-family residential lots to the north. The secured, enclosed design of the facility will also have a significant, positive impact on vagrancy on the property. 5. The amendment will not adversely burden public facilities, including the traffic -carrying capacities of streets, in an unreasonably or disproportionate manner. Compared to the existing office on the property, the proposed use of self -storage will generate less traffic and consume less water and sanitary capacity. 6. The district boundaries are appropriately drawn with due regard to the locations and classifications of streets, ownership lines, existing improvements and the natural environment. The rezoning is restricted to one parcel that is currently a mixed -zoned parcel. The amendment will make the zoning of the parcel consistent with the other adjacent parcels zoned commercial. The proposed self - storage development will have less impervious area than the existing office development. The stormwater management system also will Page 4 of 5 STORCON DEVELOPMENT, to Gulf to Bay Self Storage, October 6, 2017 be upgraded to meet current standards. There are no wetlands or other sensitive environmental features on the property. 4. It is not necessary to provide a survey for the parcel associated with the TDR application as part of this application. Response: Noted. We trust the above responses and supplement information address your requirements to proceed with the review and approval of this application, but please feel free to contact me at jon.dorman(&-hotmail.com or 813-310- 8520 with any questions you may have. Sincerely yours, P� Jonathan Dorman, P.E. :jmd Enclosure: Sketch & Description, Revised Application Forms cc: Brian Aungst, Macfarlane Ferguson & McMullen Page 5 of 5 BwcHT hh'D sE11t] nnm- shy To wAcil PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CASE: REQUEST: GENERAL DATA: Applicant ......................... Owner............................. Location .......................... Property Size ................ Background: STAFF REPORT LUP2017-10011 To amend the Future Land Use Map designation from Residential/Office General (R/OG) to Commercial General (CG) Brian J. Aungst, Jr., Esq. Rental Houses, LLC 300 South Duncan Avenue, located on the west side of South Duncan Avenue approximately 280 feet north of Gulf to Bay Boulevard 2.807 -acre portion of a 3.196 -acre property This case involves 2.807 acres of a 3.196 -acre parcel located on the west side of South Duncan Avenue, approximately 280 feet north of Gulf to Bay Boulevard (SR 60). The property is owned by Rental Houses, LLC and is occupied by a three-story, 70,855 square foot (gross floor area) office building with ancillary off- street parking. The overall parcel is a flag lot, where the proposed amendment area has frontage on South Duncan Avenue (3 10 feet) and Rainbow Drive (3 96 feet). A narrow portion of the parcel extends to Gulf to Bay Boulevard (60 feet of frontage), approximately 345 feet west of South Duncan Avenue, providing access to the office (excluded from the proposed amendment). Maps 1 and 2 show the general location of the property and an aerial view of the amendment area. The existing office was constructed in 1976. A development proposal to demolish the existing office and replace it with a 76,490 square foot self -storage warehouse consisting of 700 units spread across four buildings on the proposed amendment area and an 875 square foot sales office located on the remainder of the parcel has been submitted for review (continued case FLD2017-09018). The proposed self -storage warehouse use is not allowed within the property's current zoning district. The request is to change the Future Land Use Map designation of the proposed amendment area from Residential/Office General (R/OG) to Commercial General (CG), thereby establishing a uniform future land use designation across the parcel. A request to rezone the proposed amendment area from the Office (0) District to the Commercial (C) District is being processed concurrently with this case (see REZ2017-10012). Level III Conprehensive Plan Amendment Review itl � I�1 < Lu Wo/E k Sr E < + i Zt M1R11 ST � G Z �$ D �.�_ -L �J z O� LAO . 9PpJ[1{ � 1""ST LO w w HARVARD ST <ww z t U ✓ �-- O RMNBOW DR y, FROJECT am W WZ (.Wl?1 R F � OLLF-TO.SAV BLVD < W _ < Z O 11 W X Y ' b 1IMER ST 5 w 111 7 TURIER ST = � ! n o LOCATION MAP PLANNING& DEVELOPMENT LONG RANGE PLANNING DIVISION Map 1 Map 2 Vicinity Characteristics: Map 3 shows the existing surrounding uses. The immediate area to the north across Rainbow Drive is developed with single-family houses. Abutting to the south is an office (Synovus Bank) and an automobile service station (Thorntons). The area to the east consists of offices, as well as attached dwellings and a single-family detached dwelling. The area to the west is a mixture of office and medical clinic uses. 30 --------- �« o 2 ems• f�fice Gas � j Office cucF-ro-aarecvD CUB Pia - O Map 3 C uununity Developm48t Doiud—11m,r3lillrl 14, 7617 Revised for City Council Meeting — January 18, 2018 Revised for Forward Pinellas — May 7, 2018 LUP2017-10011 -Page 2 of 9 N Level III Comprehensive Plan Amendment Review PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT LONG RANGE PLANNING DMSION As shown on Map 4, the abutting future land use designations are Residential/Office General (R/OG) to the west and Commercial General (CG) to the south. To the north, across Rainbow Drive, is Residential Urban (RU) and to the east, across South Duncan Avenue, is Commercial General (CO). The surrounding vicinity has additional areas designated Residential Urban (RU) along the north and south sides of Rainbow Drive, and a mix of Residential/Office General (R/OG) and Commercial General (CG) along the south side of Rainbow Drive. A comparison between the uses, densities and intensities allowed by the present and proposed Future Land Use Map designations appears in Table 1, along with the consistent zoning districts. Map 4 Present 1`1 1 � N1 Designation 1�esideiitial/(Jllice General (ft/0G) Requested NJullalion Commercial General (CG) Primary Uses: 1 i { ■ ro e a € €n Overnight Accommodations i 15 Dwelling Units Per Acre MR Maximum Density: Overnight Accommodation Units Per — � w Maximum Intensity: FAR 0.50; ISR 0.75 !q NBGW Consistent Zoning [ -v t E Districts: a M■UM E E si !9 R/OG _ R(OG_ CG W. .o ..�, µRU A� CG H o a, €e €e �p'3 Vie•. �f"c e F I€ € e A GULF-TO-BAYSM B Q FP D CG =�=z CP 1 11 T71 CG RU x FUTURE LAND USE MAP Map 4 Map 5 Table 1. Uses, Densities and Intensities Allowed by Present and Proposed Future Land Use Designations Present 1`1 1 � N1 Designation 1�esideiitial/(Jllice General (ft/0G) Requested NJullalion Commercial General (CG) Primary Uses: Medium Density Residential; Residential Office; Retail Sales and Service; Equivalent; Office Overnight Accommodations 15 Dwelling Units Per Acre 24 Dwelling Units Per Acre; 40 Maximum Density: Overnight Accommodation Units Per Acre Maximum Intensity: FAR 0.50; ISR 0.75 FAR 0.55; ISR 0.90 Consistent Zoning Medium Density Residential (MDR) Commercial (C) Districts: Office (0) M■UM Map 5 Table 1. Uses, Densities and Intensities Allowed by Present and Proposed Future Land Use Designations Cornmunity Development Rnard —De- e nilmr 19, 2017 ReVi5ed for Ui y Council Meeting — January 18, 2018 Revised for Forward Pinellas — May 7, 2018 LUP2017-10011 - Page 3 of 9 Present 1`1 1 � N1 Designation 1�esideiitial/(Jllice General (ft/0G) Requested NJullalion Commercial General (CG) Primary Uses: Medium Density Residential; Residential Office; Retail Sales and Service; Equivalent; Office Overnight Accommodations 15 Dwelling Units Per Acre 24 Dwelling Units Per Acre; 40 Maximum Density: Overnight Accommodation Units Per Acre Maximum Intensity: FAR 0.50; ISR 0.75 FAR 0.55; ISR 0.90 Consistent Zoning Medium Density Residential (MDR) Commercial (C) Districts: Office (0) Cornmunity Development Rnard —De- e nilmr 19, 2017 ReVi5ed for Ui y Council Meeting — January 18, 2018 Revised for Forward Pinellas — May 7, 2018 LUP2017-10011 - Page 3 of 9 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT Level III Comprehensive Plan Amendment Review LONG RANGE PLANNING DMSION Consistency with the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan [Sections 4-603.F.1 and 4-603.F.21 Recommended Findings of Fact: Applicable goal, objectives and policies of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan which support the proposed amendment include: Goal A.2 A sufficient variety and amount of future land use categories shall be provided to accommodate public demand and promote infill development. Goal A.4. The City shall work toward a land use pattern that can be supported by the available community and public facilities that would be required to serve the development. Objective A.4.1 The City's Concurrency Management System will ensure that compatibility of all proposed development with the capacities of the existing and planned support facilities for which a level of service has been adopted. Objective A.6.4 Due to the built -out character of the city of Clearwater, compact urban development within the urban service area shall be promoted through application of the Clearwater Community Development Code. Objective 13.1.5 The City shall specifically consider the existing and planned LOS the road network affected by a proposed development, when considering an amendment to the land use map, rezoning, subdivision plat, or site plan approval. The property is currently developed with a multi -story office building. The applicant has indicated the intention to develop the property with a self -storage warehouse which would be possible through the proposed future land use change and companion rezoning. Although the proposed Commercial General (CG) designation allows for more intense development, the proposed use is less intense in terms of potential impacts than the current use. In addition, the proposal does not degrade the level of service for public facilities below the adopted standards (a detailed public facilities analysis follows in this report). Recommended Conclusions of Law: The request does not conflict with the goals, objectives and policies of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan and furthers said plan as indicated above. Consistency with the Countywide Rules Recommended Findings of Fact: The underlying Countywide Plan Map category on the proposed amendment area is Office (0), which is on the edge of two districts found on the south side of Rainbow Drive, with Retail & Services (R&S) located to the east of South Duncan Avenue and Office (0) located to the west of the subject property. The proposed City of Clearwater future land use designation of Commercial General (CG) will necessitate an amendment from the Office (0) category to the Retail & Services (R&S) category to maintain consistency between the City's Future Land Use Map and the Countywide Plan Map. Community Development Board —December 19, 2017 Revised for City Council Meeting — January 18, 2018 Revised for Forward Pinellas — May 7, 2018 LUP2017-10011 - Page 4 of 9 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT Level III comprehensive Plan Amendment Review LONG RANGE PLANNING DIVISION Section 2.3.3.7 of the Countywide Rules states that the Retail & Services (R&S) category is intended to depict areas developed with, or appropriate to be developed with, a mix of businesses that provide for the shopping and personal service needs of the community or region, provide for employment opportunities and accommodate target employment uses, and may include residential uses as part of the mix of uses. The proposed amendment area is located across the Rainbow Drive right-of-way from single family homes to the north, to other office and medical clinic uses to the west, and across South Duncan Avenue from a mix of commercial and residential uses to the east. Retail & Services (R&S) is designated on properties to the south along Gulf to Bay Boulevard and east across South Duncan Avenue, and the Office (0) category is designated on the surrounding properties adjacent and to the west. Property along the north side of Rainbow Drive is designated Residential Low Medium (RLM). The proposed use, as indicated by the applicant, is a self -storage warehouse, which is consistent with the proposed and surrounding Countywide Plan Map categories. Recommended Conclusions of Law: The proposed Future Land Use Map amendment is consistent with the purpose of the proposed category in the Countywide Rules. Compatibility with Surrounding Properties/Character of the City & Neighborhood [Section 4-603.F.3 and Section 4-603.F.61 Recommended Findings of Fact: Existing surrounding uses consist primarily of single family residential (detached dwellings) (north) and offices and medical clinics (west and south). There is an assortment of offices and residential (attached dwellings) to the east, across South Duncan Avenue, and a gas station (south). The proposed Commercial General (CG) future land use category primarily permits nonresidential development at an intensity of 0.55 FAR. Residential development is permitted at a density of 24 dwelling units per acre (allowed through mixed-use), and overnight accommodations are permitted at 40 overnight accommodation units per acre. The future land use designations of surrounding properties include Residential Urban (RU), Residential Office/General (R/OG) and Commercial General (CG). The proposed Commercial General (CG) future land use category is consistent with the Commercial (C) zoning district, which permits a variety of commercial uses as minimum standard uses, including retail plazas, restaurants, offices, overnight accommodations, and vehicle sales/display. The proposed Commercial General (CG) future land use category is consistent with the future land use designations that exist to the east, south and west of the subject property. The proposed amendment will allow the site to be developed with a self -storage warehouse as proposed. Community Development Board —December 19, 2017 Revised for City Council Meeting — January 18, 2018 Revised for Forward Pinellas — May 7, 2018 LUP2017-10011 - Page 5 of 9 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT Level In Comprehensive Plan Amendment Review LONG RANGE PLANNING DIVISION Recommended Conclusions of Law: The proposed Commercial General (CG) future land use category is in character with the Future Land Use Map designations in the area. Further, the proposal is compatible with surrounding commercial and office uses on the surrounding properties. Sufficiency of Public Facilities [Section 4-603.F.41 Recommended Findings of Fact: To assess the sufficiency of public facilities needed to support potential development on the proposed amendment area, the maximum development potential of the property under the present and requested City Future Land Use Map designations were analyzed. Table 2. Development Potential for Existing & Proposed FL UM Designations As shown in the table, there is an increase in development potential across the amendment area which would increase demand on most public facilities, but would not degrade them below acceptable levels as detailed below. The following analysis compares the maximum potential development of the proposed Commercial General (CG) future land use developed with a self -storage use (67,249 square feet) to the maximum development potential of the existing Residential/Office General (R/OG) future land use category developed with an office use (61,136 square feet). Potable Water The increase in development potential from this amendment would result in an increase in potable water use of 612 gallons per day. This is determined by comparing the potential potable water utilization of the maximum square footage allowed by the proposed land use developed with a nonresidential use (6,725 gallons per day) to the potential utilization of a nonresidential use built out to the maximum square footage allowed by the current land use designation (6,113 gallons per day). Community Development Board —December 19, 2017 Revised for City Council Meeting — January 18, 2018 Revised for Forward Pinellas — May 7, 2018 LUP2017-10011 - Page 6 of 9 1 I Net Change Site Area 2.807 AC 2.807 AC (122,272 SF) (122,272 SF) Maximum 42 DUs' 67 DUs2 25 DUs Development 61,136 SF 67,249 SF 6,113 SF Potential 0.50 FAR 0.55 FAR 0.15 FAR Notes: 1. Residential uses permitted through consistent Office (0) District as part of mixed-use project. 2. Residential uses permitted through consistent Commercial (C) District as part of mixed-use project,or potentially through a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. Abbreviations: FLUM — Future Land Use Map DUs — Dwelling Units AC — Acres FAR — Floor Area Ratio SF — S uare feet As shown in the table, there is an increase in development potential across the amendment area which would increase demand on most public facilities, but would not degrade them below acceptable levels as detailed below. The following analysis compares the maximum potential development of the proposed Commercial General (CG) future land use developed with a self -storage use (67,249 square feet) to the maximum development potential of the existing Residential/Office General (R/OG) future land use category developed with an office use (61,136 square feet). Potable Water The increase in development potential from this amendment would result in an increase in potable water use of 612 gallons per day. This is determined by comparing the potential potable water utilization of the maximum square footage allowed by the proposed land use developed with a nonresidential use (6,725 gallons per day) to the potential utilization of a nonresidential use built out to the maximum square footage allowed by the current land use designation (6,113 gallons per day). Community Development Board —December 19, 2017 Revised for City Council Meeting — January 18, 2018 Revised for Forward Pinellas — May 7, 2018 LUP2017-10011 - Page 6 of 9 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT Level III Comprehensive Plan Amendment Review LONG RANGE PLANNING DMSION Wastewater The increase in development potential from this amendment would also result in an increase in wastewater production of 489 gallons per day. This is determined by comparing the potential wastewater generation of the proposed land use developed with a nonresidential use (5,379 gallons) to the potential wastewater generation of the current land use designation developed with a nonresidential use (4,890 gallons). Solid Waste The proposed amendment could result in an increase of 70.3 tons per year of solid waste generated when comparing the amount of waste generated by a warehouse use to that of an office use. All solid waste disposal is handled by Pinellas County at the Pinellas County Waste -to -Energy Plant and the Bridgeway Acres Sanitary Landfill which has significant capacity. Additionally, the City provides a full-service citywide recycling program which diverts waste from the landfill, helping to extend the lifespan of Bridgeway Acres. There is excess solid waste capacity to serve the amendment area. Parkland The City's adopted LOS for parkland acreage, which is 4 acres per 1,000 population, will not be impacted by this proposed amendment. Under both the existing and proposed land use, the LOS citywide will remain at 15.46 acres per 1,000 population. Stormwater Site plan approval will be required before the property can be redeveloped. At that time, the stormwater management system for the site will be required to meet all City and SWFWMD stormwater management criteria. Streets The subject property is located at the southwest side corner of South Duncan Avenue and Rainbow Avenue, approximately 280 feet north of Gulf to Bay Boulevard. To evaluate potential impacts to streets, the typical traffic impacts figure (trips per day per acre) in the Countywide Rules for the corresponding Countywide Plan Map categories (current and proposed) are compared. The current number of trips per day (250 trips) is calculated based on the typical traffic generation numbers for the Office (0) category (89 trips per day per acre). The proposed Countywide Plan Map category of Retail & Service (R&S) (433 trips per day per acre) would increase the number of trips per day to 1,215 trips per day. This is an increase of 965 trips per day compared to the number of trips under the current designation. The proposed self -storage use, if constructed, would generate fewer trips overall; however, evaluations of potential impacts are based on the maximum impacts possible through the proposed future land use changes. Recommended Conclusions of Law: Based upon the findings of fact, it is determined that although the proposed change will result in increased demand on many public facilities, it will not result in the degradation of the existing levels of service for potable water, sanitary sewer, solid waste, parkland, stormwater management and streets. Community Development Board —December 19, 2017 Revised for City Council Meeting — January 18, 2018 Revised for Forward Pinellas — May 7, 2018 LUP2017-10011 - Page 7 of 9 Level III comprehensive Plan Amendment Review Impact on Natural Resources [Section 4-603.F.51 PLANNING k DEVELOPMENT LANG RANGE PLANNING DMSION Recommended Findings of Fact: No wetlands appear to be located on the subject property. The City's codes require that development is compliant with the City's tree preservation, landscaping and stormwater management requirements. The City's codes require that development is compliant with the City's tree preservation, landscaping and stormwater management requirements. Recommended Conclusions of Law: Based upon the findings of fact, it is determined that the proposed Future Land Use Map amendment will not negatively impact natural resources on the subject property. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: No amendment to the Comprehensive Plan or Future Land Use Map shall be recommended for approval or receive a final action of approval unless it complies with the standards contained in Section 4-603.17, Community Development Code. Table 3 below depicts the consistency of the proposed amendment with the standards pursuant to Section 4-603.F: Table 3. Consistency with Community Development Code Standards for Review CDC Section 4-603 Standard Consistent Inconsistent F.1 The amendment will further implementation of the X Comprehensive Plan consistent with the goals, policies and objectives contained in the Plan. F.2 The amendment is not inconsistent with other provisions X of the Comprehensive Plan. F.3 The available uses, if applicable, to which the properties X may be put are appropriate to the properties in question and compatible with existing and planned uses in the area. F.4 Sufficient public facilities are available to serve the X properties. F.5 The amendment will not adversely affect the natural X environment. F.6 The amendment will not adversely impact the use of X properties in the immediate area. Community Development Board —December 19, 2017 Revised for City Council Meeting — January 18, 2018 Revised for Forward Pinellas — May 7, 2018 LUP2017-10011 - Page 8 of 10 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT Level Ill Comprehensive Plan Amendment Review LONG RANGE PLANNING DMSION Based on the foregoing, the Planning and Development Department recommends the following action: Recommend Approval of the Future Land Use Map Amendment designation from Residential/Office General (R/OG) to Commercial General (CG). Prepared by Planning and Development Department Staff. Lauren Matzke, AICP Long Range Planning Manager ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance No. 9101-18 Photographs of Site and Vicinity Community Development Board —December 19, 2017 Revised for City Council Meeting — January 18, 2018 Revised for Forward Pinellas — May 7, 2018. LUP2017-10011 -Page 9 of 9 SUBJECT/RECOMMENDATION: uearwater City Commission Work session Item #: Agenda Cover Memorandum Final Agenda Item # Work Session Meeting Date: 1/16/18 Deny a Future Land Use Map Amendment from the Residential/Office General (R/OG) category to the Commercial General (CG) category for 300 South Duncan Avenue; and do not pass Ordinance 9101-18 on first reading. (LUP2017-10011) SUMMARY: This Future Land Use Map amendment involves 2.807 acres of a 3.196 -acre parcel located on the west side of South Duncan Avenue, approximately 280 feet north of Gulf to Bay Boulevard (SR 60). The property is owned by Rental Houses, LLC and is occupied by a three-story, 69,000 square foot office building with ancillary off-street parking. The overall parcel is a flag lot, where the proposed amendment area has frontage on South Duncan Avenue (310 feet) and Rainbow Drive (396 feet). A narrow portion of the parcel extends to Gulf to Bay Boulevard (60 feet of frontage), approximately 345 feet west of South Duncan Avenue, providing access to the office (excluded from the proposed amendment). The applicant is requesting to change the Future Land Use Map designation of the proposed amendment area from Residential/Office General (R/OG) to Commercial General (CG). The requested amendment would allow the property to be redeveloped with a self -storage use. The applicant has submitted a Zoning Atlas amendment (see case REZ2017-10012) which is being processed concurrently with this case. The proposed Commercial General (CG) category allows a variety of uses, including retail sales and service, overnight accommodations, and office uses, and would permit nonresidential development at a FAR of 0.55. The site is currently developed with an office that was constructed in 1976 and is over 88% leased. The building currently houses many targeted industries (i.e., Financial and Professional Services) including medical offices, attorneys, mortgage firms, real estate office, accounting offices and other professional businesses. The City is committed to preserving land for targeted industries, and encourages the development of sites and buildings needed to accommodate higher intensity employment opportunities, and according to the City's Economic Development and Housing Department, the site is considered a strategic location for office uses and is well-suited for continued office use consistent with the goals of the Economic Development Strategic Plan. A development proposal to demolish the existing office and replace it with a 76,490 square foot self -storage facility is inconsistent with both the Economic Development Strategic Plan and the City's Comprehensive Plan. The existing use of the property constitutes a higher level of viable economic use. Additionally, the proposed Commercial General (CG) category is not appropriately located, and is not in character with the residential neighborhood to the north, along Rainbow Drive. While certain permitted uses may be compatible with the single-family uses in the area, these same uses are also already permitted through the existing Office (0) District. The Planning and Development Department determined that the proposed Future Land Use Map amendment is inconsistent with the provisions of the Clearwater Community Development Code as specified below: • The proposed amendment is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the Countywide Plan Rules. • The proposed amendment is incompatible with the surrounding property and character of the neighborhood. • The proposed amendment will have an adverse impact on the use of property in the immediate area. Please refer to the attached staff report for LUP2017-10011 for the complete analysis. S: (Planning Departmen6C D BU,and Use Amendments49ctive CaseslDuncan Ave 300 LUP2017-10011 -Rental Houses LMLUP2017-10011 CC Cover Memo.docx In accordance with the Countywide f Rules, this land use plan amendmei subject to the approval of Forward Pinellas, in its role as the Pinellas rlanning Council, and the Board of County Commissioners acting as the Countywide Planning Authority. The application is a small-scale amendment SQ review and approval by the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity and other state agencies is not required. Prior to the Community Development Board meeting, the city received one letter on behalf of the Skycrest Neighbors in opposition to this proposal. The Community Development Board reviewed this application at its December 19, 2017 public hearing and made a recommendation of approval to the Council, with four members voting in support of and three in opposition of the amendment. Attachments: LUP2017-10011 Staff Report Ordinance 9101-18 Site Photos S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BlLand Use AmendmentslActive CaseslDuncan Ave 300 LUP2017-10011 -Rental Houses LMLUP2017-10011 CC Cover Memo.docx BRJC.#rr AND RiAMIRIL- RAY W RfAC11 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: CASE: REQUEST: GENERAL DATA: Applicant ........ Owner ............. Location ......... Property Size ................... Background: December 19, 2017 H.5. LUP2017-10011 To amend the Future Land Use Map designation from Residential/Office General (R/OG) to Commercial General (CG) Brian J. Aungst, Jr., Esq. Rental Houses, LLC 300 South Duncan Avenue, located on the west side of South Duncan Avenue approximately 280 feet north of Gulf to Bay Boulevard 2.807 -acre portion of a 3.196 -acre property This case involves 2.807 acres of a 3.196 -acre parcel located on the west side of South Duncan Avenue, approximately 280 feet north of Gulf to Bay Boulevard (SR 60). The property is owned by Rental Houses, LLC and is occupied by a three-story, 69,000 square foot office building with ancillary off-street parking. The overall parcel is a flag lot, where the proposed amendment area has frontage on South Duncan Avenue (3 10 feet) and Rainbow Drive (396 feet). A narrow portion of the parcel extends to Gulf to Bay Boulevard (60 feet of frontage), approximately 345 feet west of South Duncan Avenue, providing access to the office (excluded from the proposed amendment). Maps 1 and 2 show the general location of the property and an aerial view of the amendment area. The existing office was constructed in 1976, and is over 88% leased. The building currently houses many targeted industries (i.e., Financial and Professional Services) including medical offices, attorneys, mortgage firms, real estate office, accounting offices and other professional businesses. Currently, there is 8,000 square feet of office space available, and the asking rent is $10 per square foot. A development proposal to demolish the existing office and replace it with a 76,490 square foot self -storage facility consisting of 700 units spread across four buildings on the proposed amendment area and an 875 square foot sales office located on the remainder of the parcel has been submitted for review (continued case FLD2017-09018). The proposed self - storage use is not allowed within the property's current zoning district. The request is to change the Future Land Use Map designation of the proposed amendment area from Residential/Office General (R/OG) to Commercial General (CG), thereby establishing a uniform future land use designation across the parcel. A W Uvd ID Campebwaik Plea Amaxkmt Review FL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT LONG RANGE PLANNING DIVISION request to rezone the proposed amendment area from the Office (0) District to the Commercial (C) District is being processed concurrently with this case (see REL2017-10012). L=J_;=C - � CLEVEDWO ST _._ 0 P-AMBOW J a PROJECT g WE am m —`_ � noaavatvo ` 1Zi S 6S. O ti LOCATION MAP Map 1 Vicinity Characteristics: 1 ✓ x°; ' , i a AERIAL MAP Map 2 Map 3 shows the existing surrounding uses. The immediate area to the north across Rainbow Drive is developed with single-family houses. Abutting to the south is an office (Synovus Bank) and an automobile service station (Thorntons). The area to the east consists of offices, as well as attached dwellings and a single-family detached dwelling. The area to the west is a mixture of office and medical clinic uses. Community Development Board —December 19, 2017 Revised for City Council Meeting — January 18, 2018 LUP2017-10011 - Page 2 of 11 Level HI Comprehensive Plan Amendment Review a c RETIC IBB L ■ � � IB7' `IBP � • iM .og X ice Gas 1 b Q cT O s�o 3 I_ Office entF�u.anrmw etaff Pla a p ' �L- • I -' L _ J Map 3 PLANNING & DEVELOPMEN I I-ONG RANGE PLANNPQG DIVISION As shown on Map 4, the abutting future land use designations are Residential/Office General (R/OG) to the west and Commercial General (CG) to the south. To the north, across Rainbow Drive, is Residential Urban (RU) and to the east, across South Duncan Avenue, is Commercial General (CG). The surrounding vicinity has additional areas designated Residential Urban (RU) along the north and south sides of Rainbow Drive, and a mix of Residential/Office General (R/OG) and Commercial General (CG) along the south side of Rainbow Drive. A comparison between the uses, densities and intensities allowed by the present and proposed Future Land Use Map designations appears in Table 1, along with the consistent zoning districts. Map 4 IR 21 A C N M T11- : ,ii r' $ Si I 6f9.F�70BAY�.Yb 1 9 C � c ZONING MAP Community Development Board —December 19, 2017 Revised for City Council Meeting — January 18, 2018 LUP2017-10011 - Page 3 of 11 Map 5 M® NL= B USE MAP Map 4 IR 21 A C N M T11- : ,ii r' $ Si I 6f9.F�70BAY�.Yb 1 9 C � c ZONING MAP Community Development Board —December 19, 2017 Revised for City Council Meeting — January 18, 2018 LUP2017-10011 - Page 3 of 11 Map 5 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT Level M Comprdw=ve Plan Amendment Review LONG RANGE PLANNING DMSION Table 1. Uses, Densities and Intensities Allowed by Present and Proposed Future Land Use Designations REVIEW CRITERIA: Consistency with the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan [Sections 4-603.F.1 and 4-603.F.2] Recommended Findings of Fact: The following goal, objectives and policies of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan are not supportive of the proposed amendment: Goal A.2 A sufficient variety and amount of future land use categories shall be provided to accommodate public demand and promote infill development. Objective A.2.2 Future Land Use in the City of Clearwater shall be guided by the City's Future Land Use Map, which shall be consistent with the Countywide Plan for Pinellas County (The Countywide Plan) including the Countywide Plan Map, and shall be implemented through the City's Community Development Code. Policy A.5.5.1 Development should be designed to maintain and support the existing or envisioned character of the neighborhood. Objective A.6.1 The redevelopment of blighted, substandard, inefficient and/or obsolete areas shall be a high priority and promoted through the implementation of redevelopment and special area plans, the construction of catalytic private projects, city investment, and continued emphasis on property maintenance standards. Policy A.6.1.6 Land use decisions in Clearwater shall support the expansion of economic opportunity, the creation of jobs and training opportunities as well as the maintenance of existing industries through establishment of enterprise zones, activity centers and redevelopment areas and by coordination with the Chamber of Commerce, Tourist Development Council and other economic development organizations and agencies. Policy A.6.2.2 Encourage land use conversions on economically underutilized parcels and corridors, and promote redevelopment activities in these areas. As stated in the introduction to the City's Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Element, the Goals, Objectives and Policies provide for sustainable redevelopment and infill development, as well as Community Development Board December 19, 2017 Revised for City Council Meeting — January 18, 2018 LUP2017-10011 -Page 4 of 11 Primary Uses: Medium Density Residential; Residential Office; Retail Sales and Service; Equivalent; Office Overnight Accommodations 15 Dwelling Units Per Acre 24 Dwelling Units Per Acre; 40 Maximum Density: Overnight Accommodation Units Per Acre Maximum Intensity: FAR 0.50; ISR 0.75 FAR 0.55; ISR 0.90 Consistent Zoning Medium Density Residential (MDR) Commercial (C) Districts: Office (0) REVIEW CRITERIA: Consistency with the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan [Sections 4-603.F.1 and 4-603.F.2] Recommended Findings of Fact: The following goal, objectives and policies of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan are not supportive of the proposed amendment: Goal A.2 A sufficient variety and amount of future land use categories shall be provided to accommodate public demand and promote infill development. Objective A.2.2 Future Land Use in the City of Clearwater shall be guided by the City's Future Land Use Map, which shall be consistent with the Countywide Plan for Pinellas County (The Countywide Plan) including the Countywide Plan Map, and shall be implemented through the City's Community Development Code. Policy A.5.5.1 Development should be designed to maintain and support the existing or envisioned character of the neighborhood. Objective A.6.1 The redevelopment of blighted, substandard, inefficient and/or obsolete areas shall be a high priority and promoted through the implementation of redevelopment and special area plans, the construction of catalytic private projects, city investment, and continued emphasis on property maintenance standards. Policy A.6.1.6 Land use decisions in Clearwater shall support the expansion of economic opportunity, the creation of jobs and training opportunities as well as the maintenance of existing industries through establishment of enterprise zones, activity centers and redevelopment areas and by coordination with the Chamber of Commerce, Tourist Development Council and other economic development organizations and agencies. Policy A.6.2.2 Encourage land use conversions on economically underutilized parcels and corridors, and promote redevelopment activities in these areas. As stated in the introduction to the City's Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Element, the Goals, Objectives and Policies provide for sustainable redevelopment and infill development, as well as Community Development Board December 19, 2017 Revised for City Council Meeting — January 18, 2018 LUP2017-10011 -Page 4 of 11 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT Level M Comprehensive Plan Amendment Review LONG RANGE PLANNING DIVISION neighborhood preservation, and are "... designed to preserve and enhance community character and quality of life, while ensuring continued economic vitality of the community." The Future Land Use Map depicts spatially where certain types of development are envisioned to occur. While the Community Development Code provides a path for individual property owners to request amendments to the Future Land Use Map, review of such requests must consider the achievement of the City's Goals on balance. In 201. 1, the City's Economic Development and Housing Department engaged TIP Strategies, Inc. to develop an Economic Development Strategic Plan to position Clearwater for future sustainable growth and economic prosperity. The Strategic Plan seeks to ensure long-term economic vitality through the guiding principles of tax base diversification, higher paying jobs, and business vitality. The City is committed to preserving land for targeted industries, and encourages the development of sites and buildings needed to accommodate higher intensity employment opportunities, consistent with the goals of the Economic Development Strategic Plan. Attracting target industries and higher wage jobs guide future economic development programs and activities in Clearwater. To attract target industries and accommodate higher -wage jobs, the City should more fully leverage existing sites for redevelopment. This site is considered a strategic location for office uses, given its proximity to the Downtown and SR 60. The subject property is designated Residential/Office General (R/OG), consistent with its current use as a multi -tenant office, and consistent with the properties to the west of the property on the south side of Rainbow Drive. The existing office is currently 88% leased, and many of the existing tenants are within targeted industries. According to the City's Economic Development and Housing Department, the site is well-suited for continued office use, consistent with the City's Economic Development Strategic Plan. Much of redevelopment is facilitated by removal of economically underutilized properties; however, the subject property is not economically underutilized, and the proposed use for the site as a self -storage use is the opposite of an office use. The existing office is a viable use, is not blighted or obsolete. Amending the future land use designation on the proposed amendment area would be inconsistent with Policy A.6.1.6 as it would permit redevelopment that does not expand economic opportunities or create jobs. Self -storage facilities of this size often have fewer than five employees, including part time employees. Such an amendment is also inconsistent with Policy A.6.2.2 as the site is not economically underutilized. Additionally, the current mix of future land use categories is sufficient in this area to support the envisioned character of the properties along Rainbow Drive and South Duncan Avenue, the primary frontages on which the subject site is located. The Residential/Office General (R/OG) future land use category that is found on the south side of Rainbow Drive, west of South Duncan Avenue, is consistent with both Office (0) District and Medium Density Residential (MDR) District, both of which permit uses that are in character with the single family residential neighborhood to the north of the property. Staff recognizes that that over time, uses may change, but the uses allowed through either of the consistent zoning districts are appropriate and in character with the surrounding residential development. Maintaining the subject property as Residential/Office General (R/OG) is consistent with Goal A.2, in that there is already a sufficient variety and amount of future land use categories within this general area promote infill development and there is not a need to add commercially designated property within this area. South Duncan Avenue forms the line of demarcation between the area envisioned to remain office to the west, and the area already designated as Commercial General (CG) to the east. Within the Commercial General (CG) area, there are many underutilized properties, including vacant parcels and closed businesses in one-story Community Development Board —December 19, 2017 Revised for City Council Meeting — January 18, 2018 LUP2017-10011 - Page 5 of 11 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT Lewd III Comprehensive Plan Amendment Review LONG RANGE PLANNING DIVISION buildings, that are envisioned to transition over time, consistent with the future land use designation in place. Commercial General (CG) is generally designated the length of Gulf to Bay Boulevard, and in most areas, is only applied to parcels with frontage on Gulf to Bay Boulevard and those abutting, or generally within the first 280 feet from the right-of-way. There are limited other areas, including the three blocks east of the proposed amendment area, where the entire block north to Rainbow Drive is all Commercial General (CG). However, these areas are more typically limited to the intersections of two arterials where there are larger parcels and the Commercial General (CG) future land use designation extends further north and south of Gulf to Bay. Recommended Conclusions of Law: The request is inconsistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan and conflicts said plan as indicated in the goals, objectives and policies listed above. The proposed change does not support the City's stated economic development goals and objectives. Consistency with the Countywide Rules Recommended Findings of Fact: The underlying Countywide Plan Map category on the proposed amendment area is Office (0), which is on the edge of two districts found on the south side of Rainbow Drive, with South Duncan Avenue currently serving as the dividing line between the two areas. Section 2.3.3.5 of the Countywide Rules states that the current Office (0) category is intended to accommodate areas developed, or appropriate to be developed, with office uses, low -impact employment uses, and residential uses (subject to a five -acre maximum threshold), in areas characterized by a transition between residential and commercial uses and in areas well-suited for community -scale residential/office mixed-use development. The proposed City of Clearwater future land use designation of Commercial General (CG) will necessitate an amendment from the Office (0) category to the Retail & Services (R&S) category to maintain consistency between the City's Future Land Use Map and the Countywide Plan Map. Section 2.3.3.7 of the Countywide Rules states that the Retail & Services (R&S) category is intended to depict areas developed with, or appropriate to be developed with, a mix of businesses that provide for the shopping and personal service needs of the community or region, provide for employment opportunities and accommodate target employment uses, and may include residential uses as part of the mix of uses. The proposed amendment area, which constitutes the majority of the parcel on which the proposed self -storage use would be located, is located across the Rainbow Drive right-of-way from single family homes to the north, and to other office and medical clinic uses to the west. Office (0) category is designated on the surrounding properties adjacent and to the west, and Retail & Services (R&S) is designated on properties to the south along Gulf to Bay Boulevard, and east across South Duncan Avenue. Property along the north side of Rainbow Drive is designated Residential Low Medium (RLM). Although the proposed Retail & Services (R&S) category is intended for a mix of employment, including targeted industries, it is also intended for other commercial uses, and is more typically developed with retail commercial (e.g., grocery, pharmacy, apparel, jewelry, electronics, sporting goods, specialty shops, building supplies, convenience goods, restaurant, indoor recreation/entertainment uses). While this category is partially consistent with the City's vision for this area, in that the City wants to maintain the property for office/targeted industries, the proposed self -storage use is not a target employment use. Additionally, the other uses that are consistent with this category are not appropriate in this area. Community Development Board —December 19, 2017 Revised for City Council Meeting — January 18, 2018 LUP2017-10011 - Page 6 of 11 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT Level ID ConVrdamww Plan Ammdmmt Review LONG RANGE PLANNING DIVISION The existing office building is an appropriate use in the area and is consistent with the current underlying Countywide Plan Map category and the designations on the surrounding properties. It is also consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as outlined above. The Countywide Plan Map currently uses South Duncan Avenue as the dividing line between the two categories, which is appropriate in this area, and the area currently designated with the Office (0) category appropriately serves as a transition between the commercial uses along Gulf to Bay to the south and east and the residential uses to the north and west. Recommended Conclusions of Law: While the proposed Future Land Use Map amendment is consistent with the purpose of the proposed category in the Countywide Rules it is inconsistent with the designations on the surrounding properties. The existing category in the Countywide Rules is appropriately designated and is consistent with the current use and surrounding designations on the Countywide Plan Map. Compatibility with Surrounding Properties/Character of the City & Neighborhood [Section 4-603.F.3 and Section 4-603.F.61 Recommended Findings of Fact: Existing surrounding uses consist primarily of single family residential (detached dwellings) (north) and offices and medical clinics (west and south). There is an assortment of offices and residential (attached dwellings) to the east, across South Duncan Avenue, and a gas station (south). The proposed use of the subject property is self -storage. The proposed Commercial General (CG) future land use category primarily permits nonresidential development at an intensity of 0.55 FAR. Residential development is permitted at a density of 24 dwelling units per acre (allowed through mixed-use), and overnight accommodations are permitted at 40 overnight accommodation units per acre. The future land use designations of surrounding properties include Residential Urban (RU), Residential Office/General (R/OG) and Commercial General (CG). The proposed Commercial General (CG) future land use category is consistent with the Commercial (C) zoning district, which permits a variety of commercial uses as minimum standard uses, including retail plazas, restaurants, offices, overnight accommodations, and vehicle sales/display. The proposed category and district do not appear to be appropriately located. While certain permitted uses may be compatible with the single-family uses in the area, these same uses are also already permitted through the existing Office (0) District. The request is not compatible with the surrounding area and may unreasonably affect the use of the properties in the area. Recommended Conclusions of Law: The proposed Commercial General (CG) future land use category is not in character with the Future Land Use Map designations in the area. Further, the proposal is incompatible with surrounding uses and inconsistent with the character of the surrounding properties and neighborhood. Community Development Board —December 19, 2017 Revised for City Council Meeting — January 18, 2018 LUP2017-10011 -Page 7 of 11 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT Level M ComprelMmave Plm Amendment Review LONG RANGE PLANNING DIVISION Sufficiency of Public Facilities [Section 4-603.F.41 Recommended Findings of Fact: To assess the sufficiency of public facilities needed to support potential development on the proposed amendment area, the maximum development potential of the property under the present and requested City Future Land Use Map designations were analyzed. Table 2. Development Potential for Existing & Proposed FL UM Designations As shown in the table, there is an increase in development potential across the amendment area which would increase demand on most public facilities, but would not degrade them below acceptable levels as detailed below. The following analysis compares the maximum potential development of the proposed Commercial General (CG) future land use developed with a self -storage use (67,249 square feet) to the maximum development potential of the existing Residential/Office General (R/OG) future land use category developed with an office use (61,136 square feet). Potable Water The increase in development potential from this amendment would result in an increase in potable water use of 612 gallons per day. This is determined by comparing the potential potable water utilization of the maximum square footage allowed by the proposed land use developed with a nonresidential use (6,725 gallons per day) to the potential utilization of a nonresidential use built out to the maximum square footage allowed by the current land use designation (6,113 gallons per day). Wastewater The increase in development potential from this amendment would also result in an increase in wastewater production of 489 gallons per day. This is determined by comparing the potential wastewater generation of the proposed land use developed with a nonresidential use (5,379 gallons) to the potential wastewater generation of the current land use designation developed with a nonresidential use (4,890 gallons). Community Development Board —December 19, 2017 Revised for City Council Meeting — January 18, 2018 LUP2017-10011 - Page 8 of 11 RIOG CG 2.807 AC 2.807 AC Net Change Site Area (122,272 SF) (122,272 SF) Maximum 42 DUsl 67 DUs' 25 DUs Development 61,136 SF 67,249 SF 6,113 SF Potential 0.50 FAR 0.55 FAR 0.15 FAR Notes: 1. Residential uses permitted through consistent Office (0) District as part of mixed-use project. 2. Residential uses permitted through consistent Commercial (C) District as part of mixed-use project,or potentially through a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. Abbreviations: FLUM — Future Land Use Map DUs — Dwelling Units AC — Acres FAR — Floor Area Ratio SF — Square feet As shown in the table, there is an increase in development potential across the amendment area which would increase demand on most public facilities, but would not degrade them below acceptable levels as detailed below. The following analysis compares the maximum potential development of the proposed Commercial General (CG) future land use developed with a self -storage use (67,249 square feet) to the maximum development potential of the existing Residential/Office General (R/OG) future land use category developed with an office use (61,136 square feet). Potable Water The increase in development potential from this amendment would result in an increase in potable water use of 612 gallons per day. This is determined by comparing the potential potable water utilization of the maximum square footage allowed by the proposed land use developed with a nonresidential use (6,725 gallons per day) to the potential utilization of a nonresidential use built out to the maximum square footage allowed by the current land use designation (6,113 gallons per day). Wastewater The increase in development potential from this amendment would also result in an increase in wastewater production of 489 gallons per day. This is determined by comparing the potential wastewater generation of the proposed land use developed with a nonresidential use (5,379 gallons) to the potential wastewater generation of the current land use designation developed with a nonresidential use (4,890 gallons). Community Development Board —December 19, 2017 Revised for City Council Meeting — January 18, 2018 LUP2017-10011 - Page 8 of 11 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT LEVET III Coapmhensive Plan Amendrnmi Review LONG RANGE PLANNING DIVISION Solid Waste The proposed amendment could result in an increase of 70.3. tons per year of solid waste generated when comparing the amount of waste generated by a warehouse use to that of an office use. All solid waste disposal is handled by Pinellas County at the Pinellas County Waste -to -Energy Plant and the Bridgeway Acres Sanitary Landfill which has significant capacity. Additionally, the City provides a full-service citywide recycling program which diverts waste from the landfill, helping to extend the lifespan of Bridgeway Acres. There is excess solid waste capacity to serve the amendment area. Parkland The City's adopted LOS for parkland acreage, which is 4 acres per 1,000 population, will not be impacted by this proposed amendment. Under both the existing and proposed land use, the LOS citywide will remain at 15.46 acres per 1,000 population. Stormwater Site plan approval will be required before the property can be redeveloped. At that time, the stormwater management system for the site will be required to meet all City and SWFWMD stormwater management criteria. Streets The subject property is located at the southwest side corner of South Duncan Avenue and Rainbow Avenue, approximately 280 feet north of Gulf to Bay Boulevard. To evaluate potential impacts to streets, the typical traffic impacts _figure (trips per day per acre) in the Countywide Rules for the corresponding Countywide Plan Map categories (current and proposed) are compared. The current number of trips per day (250 trips) is calculated based on the typical traffic generation numbers for the Office (0) category (89 trips per day per acre). The proposed Countywide Plan Map category of Retail & Service (R&S) (433 trips per day per acre) would increase the number of trips per day to 1,215 trips per day. This is an increase of 965 trips per day compared to the number of trips under the current designation. The proposed self -storage use, if constructed, would generate fewer trips overall; however, evaluations of potential impacts are based on the maximum impacts possible through the proposed future land use changes. Recommended Conclusions of Law: Based upon the findings of fact, it is determined that although the proposed change will result in increased demand on many public facilities, it will not result in the degradation of the existing levels of service for potable water, sanitary sewer, solid waste, parkland, stormwater management and streets. Impact on Natural Resources [Section 4-603.F.51 Recommended Findings of Fact: No wetlands appear to be located on the subject property. The City's codes require that development is compliant with the City's tree preservation, landscaping and stormwater management requirements. Community Development Board —December 19, 2017 Revised for City Council Meeting — January 18, 2018 LUP2017-10011 - Page 9 of 11 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT Leve! M comprehensive Plan Amen"wl Review LONG RANGE PLANNING DIVISION The City's codes require that development is compliant with the City's tree preservation, landscaping and stormwater management requirements. Recommended Conclusions of Law: Based upon the findings of fact, it is determined that the proposed Future Land Use Map amendment will not negatively impact natural resources on the subject property. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: No amendment to the Comprehensive Plan or Future Land Use Map shall be recommended for approval or receive a final action of approval unless it complies with the standards contained in Section 4-603.17, Community Development Code. Table 3 below depicts the consistency of the proposed amendment with the standards pursuant to Section 4-603.F: Table 3. Consistency with Community Development Code Standards for Review CDC Section 4-603 Standard Consistent Inconsistent F.1 The amendment will further implementation of the X Comprehensive Plan consistent with the goals, policies and objectives contained in the Plan. F.2 The amendment is not inconsistent with other provisions X of the Comprehensive Plan. F.3 The available uses, if applicable, to which the properties X may be put are appropriate to the properties in question and compatible with existing and planned uses in the FA area. Sufficient public facilities are available to serve the X properties. F.5 The amendment will not adversely affect the natural X environment. F.6 The amendment will not adversely impact the use of X properties in the immediate area. The proposed use is inconsistent with certain goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed use is inconsistent with the City's strategic economic development plan. The property is not economically underutilized. The existing use of the property constitutes a higher level of viable economic use. The transition of properties along the Gulf to Bay Boulevard corridor to storage and warehousing does not. constitute a preferred or desirable characteristic of this corridor. Large parcels with limited to no impacts as the result of constrained or limited employment and little or no traffic or trip generation resulting from lack of economic activity are not inherently advantageous or compatible with adjoining communities. To the contrary, such uses and activities lend themselves more appropriately to areas more suitable for limited commercial, employment, and transportation constraints. Community Development Board —December 19, 2017 Revised for City Council Meeting — January 18, 2018 LUP2017-10011 - Page 10 of 11 Level III Comprehmsw Pimp Amendment Review PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT LONG RANGE PLANNING DMSION Based on the foregoing, the Planning and Development Department recommends the following action: Recommend DENIAL of the Future Land Use Map Amendment designation from Residential/Office General (R/OG) to Commercial General (CG). Prepared by Planning and Development Department Staff. Lauren Matzke, AICP Long Range Planning Manager ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance No. 9101-18 Resume Photographs of Site and Vicinity Community Development Board —December 19, 2017 Revised for City Council Meeting — January 18, 2018 LUP2017-10011 -Page 11 of 11 ORDINANCE NO. 9101-18 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY, TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF SOUTH DUNCAN AVENUE APPROXIMATELY 280 FEET NORTH OF GULF TO BAY BOULEVARD, WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS 300 SOUTH DUNCAN AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755, FROM RESIDENTIAL/OFFICE GENERAL (R/OG) TO COMMERCIAL GENERAL (CG); PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the amendment to the Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan of the City as set forth in this ordinance is found to be reasonable, proper and appropriate, and is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan; now, therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. The Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Clearwater is amended by designating the land use category for the hereinafter described property as follows: Property See attached Exhibit A for Legal Description (LU P2017-10011) Land Use Category From: Residential/Office General (R/OG) To: Commercial General (CG) The map attached as Exhibit B is hereby incorporated by reference. Section 2. The City Council does hereby certify that this ordinance is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect contingent upon and subject to the approval of the land use change by the Pinellas County Board of Commissioners, where applicable, and thirty- one (31) days post -adoption. If this ordinance is appealed within thirty (30) days after adoption, then this ordinance will take effect only after approval of the land use designation by the Pinellas County Board of Commissioners and upon issuance of a final order determining this amendment to be in compliance either by the Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO) or the Administration Commission, where applicable, pursuant to section 163.3187, Florida Statutes. The Community Development Coordinator is authorized to transmit to Forward Pinellas, in its role as the Pinellas Planning Council, an application to amend the Countywide Plan in order to achieve consistency with the Future Land Use Plan Element of the City's Comprehensive Plan as amended by this ordinance. Ordinance No. 9101-18 PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED George N. Cretekos Mayor Approved as to form: Attest: Camilo A. Soto Rosemarie Call Assistant City Attorney City Clerk Ordinance No. 9101-18 Exhibit "A" Legal Description A. parcel of land in the SW 1/4 of the NF 1/4 of Section 14, Township 29 South, Range 1.5 East, Pinellas County,'lorida`, further described as follows; Start at the SE corner of the SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 14, Township 29 South, Range 15 East, and go N 01 degrees 11'31" W, along the 40 acre line, 50.14 feet; thence go N 88 degrees 47'06" W. 58;31feet to the point of intersection of the West right-of-way line of Duncan Avenue and the North right-of-way line of Gulf to Bay Boulevard; thence M1N 00 degrees 33'28" W, along the West right-of-way line of Duncan Avenue, 280.00 feet to the Paint of Beginning of this description; thence N 88 degrees 47'06" W, 395.53 feet; thence N 00 degrees 39' 75" W, 308.52 feet to a point on the South right-of-way line of Rainbow Drive; thence 5 88 degrees 56'09" E, along the South right-of-way Nine of Rainbow Drive, 396.14 feet to a paint of intersection with the gest right-of-way line of Duncan Avenue; thence S 00 degrees 33'28" E, along the West right-of-way line -of Duncan Avenue 30'9.54 feet to the Point of Beginning. 108 b b r -- b 0 b RAINBOI Tr h ]314 301 300 RI OG 401 116] RU CG N v b bO NQ b b 205 302 305 6 W 204 211 308 311 310 bb 400 b CG 5-07 G b b r -- b 0 b RAINBOI Tr h ]314 301 300 RI OG 401 400 RU CG N v b bO NQ b b D4 0 Z 0 Y y 111 112 ' 115 �o o A 116 b b b b OUTH ST L1J 7 bb h h b b b b b b b 1� b 200 205 302 305 6 309 204 211 308 311 310 401 400 403 CG 5-07 G 208 404 - - - �9 511 510C 51 1 514 Y e b n 216 er^- 519 y L1J Exhibit B Im L - z Rev. 11/16/17 2161 1 219 e 301 b GULF -TO -BAY BLVD 302 305 6 309 308 311 310 401 400 403 CG 5-07 G o 404 - - - �9 511 510C 51 1 514 Y G b RU er^- 519 y FUTURE LAND USE MAP Owner(s): Rental Houses, LLC Case: Site: 300 South Duncan Avenue Property Size(Acres): Land Use Zoning Residential/Office PIN: From: General (R/OG) Office (0) To: Commercial Commercial (C) Atlas Page: General CG Exhibit B Im L - z Rev. 11/16/17 2161 1 219 0 �b Tr Q W N LUP2017-1001 1 REZ2017-10012 2.807 acres 14-29-15-00000-130-0200 1 2888 0 301 302 305 6 309 308 311 310 401 400 403 402 405 404 406 407 N O OO er^- 0 �b Tr Q W N LUP2017-1001 1 REZ2017-10012 2.807 acres 14-29-15-00000-130-0200 1 2888 Vj Land Use Plan and/or Zoning Atlas Amendment Map Request Planner Name: Lauren Matzke Case Number: LUP2017-1001 1 and REZ2017-10012 Date Request Submitted: 11 /9/2017 Date Requested for: 11/22/17 Full Rage Copies of the Following Maps Required (For Ordinance): ® Future Land Use Map ® Zoning Map Electronic Copies of the Following Maps Required (For Staff Report): ® Future Land Use Map ® Zoning Map ® Location Map ® Aerial Photograph ® Existing Surrounding Uses Map ® 2" x 2" PDF Map (for Newspaper) Required Documents to be submitted to n in Bring ® Legal Description (warranty deed survey) ® Map with Proposed Site Highlighte ® EDR - no hard copies submitted - all submission material is accessible through Accela Location Language (for Ordinance Title) Location: located on the west side of South u an Avenu p ro i ately 280 feet north of Gulf to Bay Boulevard PROVIDED LEGAL DESCRIPTION VERIFIED BY: Tho as ony, PSM, eogr hic Technology Manager MAP NAME Owner(s): Rental Houses, LLC Case: LUP2017-10011 REZ2017-10012 ~ Site: 300 South Duncan Avenue Property Size(Acres): 2.811 acres Land Use Zoning PIN: 14-29-15-00000-130-0200 Residential/Office From: General (R/OG) Office (0) To: Commercial Commercial (C) General CG Atlas Page: 2888 SAPlanning Department\C D B\Land Use Amendments\Active Cases\Duncan Ave 300 LUP2017-10011 - Rental Houses LLC\Maps\LUP2017-10011; REZ2017-10012 Map Request.docx 1 2 Am 4. 5. SKETCH 8c DESCRIPTION � A parcel of land in the SW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 14, Township 29 South, Range 15 East, Pinellas County, Florida, further described as follows: Start at the SE corner of the SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 14, Township 29 South, Range 15 East, and go N 01 degrees 11'31" W, along the 40 acre line, 50.14 feet; thence go N 88 degrees 47'06" W, 58.31 feet to the point of intersection of the West right-of-way line of Duncan Avenue and the North right-of-way line of Gulf, to Bay Boulevard; thence N 00 degrees 33'28" W, along the West right-of-way line of Duncan Avenue, 280.00 feet to the Point of Beginning of this description; thence'N 88 degrees 47'06" W, 395.63 feet; thence N 00 degrees 39` 25" W, 308.52 feet to a point on the South right-of-way line of Rainbow Drive; thence S 88 degrees 56' 09"E, along the South right-of-way line of Rainbow Drive; 396.14 feet to a point of intersection with the West right-of-way line of Duncan Avenue; thence S 00 degrees 33' 28" E, along the West right-of-way line -of Duncan Avenue 309.54 feet to the Point of Beginning. CONTAINING: 2.811 ACRES. MORE OR LESS. 2.0-0-07, BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF GULF TO BAY BOULEVARD, HAVING A GRID BEARING OF NORTH 88'43'42" WEST. THERE MAY BE ADDITIONAL EASEMENTS, RESTRICTIONS, AND/OR MATTERS NOT SHOWN ON THIS SURVEY WHICH MAY .BE FOUND IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF THIS COUNTY. THIS SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER. THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY S RRj/EY. BEARINGS AND DISTANCES ARE MEASURED AND RECORDED (R). l'I2OPO&ED RF.ZONJNG PtN,RC.El: SKETCH 8 LEGAL DESCRIPTION SHEET 1 OF 2 mAl�s In X17. A;ew 1 =100' pint to �a .472.#1Tx�Fi STA KKAn ST 10105,11 7_. �C,` KKM o a �iSri r NaELUNG A i STRETCH & DESCRIPTION S88'56'09"E 396.14' (R) S88` 53' 14"E 396.64' SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE in cp OF RAINBOW DRIVE 00 cO W O �d 00 - �r 0N CN �o N M PORTION TO BE REZONED o 0 rn o V) zZ �° CT; of 00 n Co POINT OF BEGINNING 395.63' N88'47'06"W (R) 395.82' N880 46'54 W w Z w z w o LL ^n > 0", =w 2z ZILL. v N88'47'06"W z bN 58.31' (R) < o r N88 47' 16„ W oo 58.19' GULF -TO -BAY BOULEVARD N1.11'31 "W (R) N01* 07'39"W 40 acre line 50.14' POINT OF COMMENCEMENT (NOT FOUND) SE CORNER OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST PROPOSED REZONING PARCEL -�8=4T LAPD SIAtYEYM INC, 111 FOREST LAKES BOULEVARD OLDSMAR, FLORIDA 34677 LB 45v BOUNDARY =T0MRAPHIC CONSTi 7JQNSTAKf yUt PN: (813).J644342:..5LStIRVE' AMPAMY2i. M, SKETCH & LEGAL DESCRIPTION O. PROJECT NNO.. -_ 1064 DRAWING 17064 SCALE 1"=100' -100' DRAWN KKM DATE 10/05/17 CHECKED/QC.. KKM FIELD CREW N/A _ BK. / PG. N/A SURVEY DATE . NIA SHEET 2 OF 2 i i -4 10 12 206 4 13 -101 -r0/ .100 17 16 I 8 i 9 1110 1 11 �2 11D Ir Y 1 b W lr ri'vblu e 11 14 1V-12 15 3V/ L 401 7 �� E E 402 405?tjV 13104 .,..-.. 407 _ adiaa_1 — 1•�3 1.12 Ac i 1 VAI MD W✓/s^d N 0 ! 04 301 300 L117 I I f--- -101 -r0/ .100 J 12 3 I 8 i 9 1110 1 11 �2 11D Ir Y 1 b W lr ri'vblu e LL Y 58.1 —— 6 7 8 9 10 '111 12 14 274w� 4 24 —hL�i 3 22 a, 21 Ii fL 20 1 ,I 1.9 1 �a� 8 141* 16 1- i 6 15 1 1a:8 E 12 lb- 2ti _ L�1ais 13 � 1 4 t 3_r t E 1__I 2 � a3 13102 /' t.... .- I 300 3:2+— A c tc1 r % J\\ \\\ r4722o I_ t '01, -' iE' J' ✓' ?�.. I 7 F._......„«..1� 130 403 ' I t 3V/ L 401 7 400 E E 402 405?tjV 13104 .,..-.. 407 _ adiaa_1 — 1•�3 1.12 Ac i 1 —rA[c ! r b ..................... .......__.. GULF TO BAY 17 I 1 .s�_ 11_13_ �4 25 60 14 r— I ,—_J 11 I ! # 30J 3011_1 I_ t '01, -' iE' 3x ?�.. I 7 F._......„«..1� 130 403 ' til_ 11 31� 3V/ L 401 7 400 403 402 405?tjV t �'� A6 .,..-.. 407 li 1_«s adiaa_1 D O rn 60 1-,13 12 F" j LVD 01 Ira SR -60 fl `^\ ', sa Ri 1 so F V YJj:i �'i ILI I r_ 2 _t rGi 598� 1 t 51 1 4 2978 30J 2 o '01, -' iE' 308 (V 30-1 ?It3 --- t I kF II f F._......„«..1� 400 403 1� I 14116 E ( _ 408 � 1M1i17 i y 407 i i— t 4'j5 t I w 1 t 14118 t E 1 li 1_«s LVD 01 Ira SR -60 fl `^\ ', sa Ri 1 so F V YJj:i �'i ILI I r_ 2 _t rGi 598� 1 t 51 1 4 2978 Matzke, Lauren From: Matzke, Lauren Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2018 2:38 PM To: Delk, Michael; Clayton, Gina Subject: Summary of zoning district uses (300 S Duncan) The following summarizes the development potential for the current and proposed future land use designations, as well as the various uses permitted by the consistent zoning districts, through'the different approval levels. The Mayor had asked about the various uses during work session. Current Future Land Use: Residential/Office General, consistent with Office & Medium Density Residential Districts (zoning); 15 dwelling units per acre, FAR .50/ISR .75 Current Zoning: Office District • Minimum Standard Uses: Funeral Homes, Medical Clinic, Offices, Parks & Recreation Facilities, Places of Worship, Schools, Telecommunications Towers • Flex Standard (Level 1) Uses: Educational Facilities, Funeral Homes, Medical Clinic, Nursing Homes, Offices, Off - Street Parking, Places of Worship, TV/Radio, Vets Offices • Flex Development (Level 2): Comprehensive Infill, Mixed Use, Nursing Homes, TV/Radio Proposed Future Land Use: Commercial General;,consistent with Commercial District zoning only; 24 dwelling units per acre; 40 overnight accommodations units per acre, FAR 0.55, ISR 0.90 Proposed Zoning: Commercial District • Minimum Standard Uses: Community Gardens, Funeral Homes, Governmental Uses, Indoor Rec/Entertainment, Medical Clinics, Mixed.Use,,Offices, Overnight Accommodations, Parks & Rec Facilities, Places of Worship, Restaurants, Retail Plazas, Retail Sales & Services, Social & Community Centers, Telecommunications Towers, Vehicle Sales/Display, Vet Offices • Flex Standard (Level 1) Uses: Accessory Dwellings, Alcoholic Beverage Sales, Automobile Service Stations, Bars, Brewpubs, Educational Facilities, Funeral Homes, Governmental Uses, Indoor Rec/Entertainment, Medical Clinics, Microbreweries, Mixed Use, Nightclubs, Offices, Off -Street Parking, overnight Accommodations, Places of Worship, Public Transportation Facilities, Restaurants, Retail Plazas, Retail Sales & Services, Schools, Social & Community Centers, Utility/Infrastructure Facilities, Vehicle Sales/Displays, Vet Offices • Flex Development (Level 2) Uses: Alcoholic Beverage Sales, Animal Boarding, Bars, Brewpubs, Comp Infill, Indoor Rec/Entertainment, Light Assembly, Limited Vehicle Service, Microbreweries, Mixed Use, Nightclubs, Offices, Off Street Parking, Outdoor Rec/Entertainment, Overnight Accommodations, Problematic Uses, Restaurants, Retail Plazas, Retail Sales & Services, RV Parks, Schools, Self Storage Warehouse, Social/Public Service Agencies, Vehicle Sales/Displays Minimum Standard — straight to building permit if minimum parcel size, parking, setbacks are met and max height not exceeded Flex Standard (Level 1) — staff level approval through Development Review Committee, allows flexibility to certain parameters, opens up more uses Flex Development (Level 2) — Community Development Board approval, more flexibility, uses, etc. Lauren Matzke, AICP Planning Manager, Long Range Planning Division Planning & Development Department, City of Clearwater PH: 727.562.4547 1 FAX: 727.562.4735 E: lauren.matzke@myclearwater.com C L.EARWATE R NE[ HBORHC)C3DS COALITION March 24, 2018 www.ClearwaterCoalition.org ClearwaterNeighborhoods@gmail.com Like us on Facebook Re: Agenda Item Concerning Proposed Self -Storage Facility at 300 S. Duncan Avenue Mayor Cretekos and Members of City Council: The Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition supports the Skycrest Neighborhood in objecting to the construction of a large storage facility at 300 S. Duncan Avenue on the grounds that this facility is incompatible with the scale and character of this neighborhood. Specifically, the developer is requesting permission to replace the existing office buildings with a 91,883 square foot self -storage facility, "with flexibility from lot width, height, setback and landscape requirements." The facility would include six buildings, maximum 35 feet high, and a minimum of 43 parking spaces. The area that is being considered is inside Skycrest neighborhood, a densely developed area consisting primarily of older, one-story homes, including small-scale"starter homes," mid-sized homes, and scattered two story apartment homes. Its neighborhood association has done a remarkable job of organizing its residents to work together to create a sense of "neighborhood" by providing a wide variety of activities for its own residents and for residents of the city. As one of Clearwater's older neighborhoods, Skycrest residents have shown a commendable initiative to rehabilitate their homes and revitalize their neighborhood. Property values have increased and the neighborhood won a well-deserved award for its efforts at our CNC mini conference earlier this month. CNC members point out that, in addition to its scale problems and its inappropriate "fit" with the character of that neighborhood, storage shed customers come and go at all hours, creating possible noise and privacy problems for the neighborhood. Furthermore, six buildings with flexibility from lot width, height, setback and landscape requirements increases concern for sustainability, as well as visual obstruction. Additionally, storage facilities represent "dead space," offering no potential for jobs and small businesses such as bakeries, hair salons, etc., for example, which would be more fitting with the character of this neighborhood. A storage facility is better suited for industrial areas and other less densely developed areas with lots not so narrowly spaced. It should be noted that we of the CNC are not opposed to development, but we believe that businesses and neighborhoods_ can benefit each other if properly placed and managed. We see no benefit to the . . neighborhood in this request and we strongly urge the council to reject it. Sincerely, Karen Cunningham, President Clearwater Neighborhoods Association Mission Statement: Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition works to enhance quality of life, safety and sustainability for our City and its neighborhoods. TO'k''R,$end Constructors, Inc. March 28, 2018 To Whom It May Concern, General Contractors CGCO58741 Roofing Contractors CCC057694 Mechanical Contractors CMC1249283 Plumbing Contractors CF•C1426566 Underground Utility Contractors CUC1224984 '�; Certif ird le WBENC W. -i B. Enerrpn e My name is Jim Townsend and my company, Townsend Constructors, Inc., owns the property located at 405 Souh Duncan Avenue. Recently, I was sent notice from the City that a property in the neighborhood located at 300 S. Duncan has been attempting to rezone to a Commercial zoning. I believe that this rezoning request is quite logical and brings a level of symmetry to the zoning map that it is currently lacking. My block for instance is exactly east of the area in question and has commercial zoning from Gulf to Bay all the way to Rainbow. Why should their block be zoned and treated any differently? Also, I believe that what Mr. Dorman and his group are doing will be a great improvement to the neighborhood. Currently 300 S. Duncan is an undesirable office structure that lacks the traffic and commercial frontage that is needed for a viable office complex today. Given the location of this property, it would seem that a use like storage would directly benefit the neighborhood more than an office complex; and may be the best use for this site. As it is now the 21st Century and technology has forced the office into our homes, automobiles, and pockets, the need for office space for smaller businesses is almost non-existent. This is evidenced by the increasing number of office properties becoming run down and obsolete; just like this one. As technology continues to change our society, the need for local government to keep up and evolve to meet the municipal needs is paramount. Zoning will need to continue to evolve to serve the public properly and get beyond the idea of preserving a past that is no longer relevant. And please remove the roundabout in front of this office building. It serves no purpose other than to confuse elderly drivers and destroy alignments on cars, trucks and buses as it has too short of a radius. Respectfully, Jim Townsend VP Townsend Constructors, Inc CC; file 405 South Duncan Avenue / Clearwater, Florida 33755 (727) 298-8077 / Fax (727) 441-2362 Matzke, Lauren From: Marino Kolitsopoulos<marino@advancedrealtygroupinc.com> Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2018 4:58 PM To: Kuligowski, Patricia; Call, Rosemarie; Matzke, Lauren Cc: Soto, Camilo Subject: 300 S. Duncan LUP-2017-10011 and REZ-2017-10012 To Whom It May Concern, My name is Marino Kolitsopoulos and my company, 1250 Main LLC, owns the property located at 1712 Gulf to Bay Blvd. Recently, I was sent notice from the City that a property in the neighborhood located at 300 S. Duncan has been attempting to rezone to a Commercial zoning. I believe that this rezoning request is quite logical and brings a level of symmetry to the zoning map that it is currently lacking. My block for instance is exactly east of the area in question and has commercial zoning from Gulf to Bay all the way to Rainbow. Why should their block be zoned and treated any differently? Also, I believe that what Mr. Dorman and his group are doing will be a great improvement to the neighborhood. Currently 300 S. Duncan is an undesirable office structure that lacks the traffic and commercial frontage that is needed for a viable office complex today. Given the location of this property, it would seem that a use like storage would directly benefit the neighborhood more than an office complex; and may be the best use for this site. As it is now the 21" Century and technology has forced the office into our homes, automobiles, and pockets, the need for office space for smaller businesses is almost non-existent. This is evidenced by the increasing number of office properties becoming run down and obsolete; just like this one. As technology continues to change our society, the need for local government to keep up and evolve to meet the municipal needs is paramount. Zoning will need to continue to evolve to serve the public properly and get beyond the idea of preserving a past that is no longer relevant. Respectfully, Marino Kolitsopoulos, CEO Advanced Realty Group, Inc. 2630 West Bay Drive Suite 105 Belleair Bluffs, FL 33770 7277518-8500 727-518-8553 fax Virus -free. www.avg.com December 18, 2017 Ms. Matzke, My Name is JoAnna Siskin and I am President of the Skycrest Neighborhood Assoc. I am writing on behalf of the neighborhood about the proposed project for 300 S Duncan. The neighborhood does not support the proposed change in land use and zoning for a storage facility. We feel it is not an appropriate project so close to a residential area. Such a large facility would be more suited to a warehouse or industrial district. Thank you for your attention to this matter; Sincerely, JoAnna Siskin President Skycrest Neighbors C EA WATE BIGHT AND BEAUTIFUL • BAY TO BEACH ...... ........ Case # LUP2017-10011 REZ2017-10012 SIGN POSTING ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I hereby acknowledge receipt of a public notice sign to post on property I own and/or represent that is being considered by the City of Clearwater for annexation, land use plan amendment and/or rezoning, and agree to post said sign on the subject property in a location where it is capable of being read from the most significant adjacent street a minimum of 10 days before the Community Development Board Meeting. Property Owner or Authorized Representative: matrL I J tr�GL�I Print Name AqAAJV sign Name Date Community Development Board Meeting Date: • December 19, 2017 City Council Public Hearing Dates: • April 4, 2018 (1St reading) • April 19, 2018 (2nd reading) The sign shall be posted on the property no later than: March 25, 2018 for City Council (continued cases) CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING 3t DEv>:LoeaiENr DErARraE,vr POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 337.58.4748 MUNICIPAL SERvICES BuimNG, 100 Sound yt ru AvENUE, CLEAMATER, FLORIDA 33756 G�A rB11SNFo�rS� TELEPHONE (72 7) 562-4567 y Conditions Associated with LUP2017-10011 300 S DUNCAN AVE The following conditions must be satisfied before the permit can be processed. Engineering Review Ivan Dimitrov 727-562-4779 10/20/2017 Please see Engineering conditions associated with FLD2017-09018. Parks and Recreation Review Debbie Reid 562-4818 10/23/2017 Please see P&R conditions associated with FLD2017- 09018. Planning Review Lauren Matzke 562-4547 10/25/2017 3. For CDB Submittal, remove all references to the Transfer of Development Rights currently found within the application. Planning Review Lauren Matzke 562-4547 10/25/2017 1. Community Development Code Section 4-603.F.2 requires that the amendment is not inconsistent with provisions of the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed amendment is inconsistent with the following Comprehensive Plan policies: (a) Policy A.2.2.8 requires commercial land uses to be located at the intersection of arterial or collector streets. (b) Policy A.5.5.1 states that development should be designed to maintain and support the existing or envisioned character of the neighborhood. Be advised that these inconsistencies are an issue in staff recommending approval. Planning Review Lauren Matzke 562-4547 10/25/2017 2. Community Development Code Section 4-603.F.3 requires that the available uses are compatible with existing and planned uses in the area. The requested amendment to Commercial General (CG) future land use and Commercial (C) District does not comply with this standard. Be advised that this incompatibility is an issue in staff recommending approval. Stormwater Review Ivan Dimitrov 727-5624779 Print Date: 12/15/2017 Page: 1 of 2 °EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRmKriv'E AcmoNi ENIPLOIRR° Status Met Met Met Not Met Not Met CaseConditions The following conditions must be satisfied before the permit can be processed. Status 10/20/2017 Please see Stormwater Engineering conditions Met associated with FLD2017-09018. Print Date: 12/15/2017 Page: 2 of 2 "EQuar. EMPLOYMENT AND AF77mav-E Ac ZION EMPLOYER" CaseConditions ri' CL '(ate• WATE R BRIGHT AND B AU FUL• BAYTO BEACH Case # LUP2017-10011 REZ2017-10012 SIGN POSTING ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I hereby acknowledge receipt of a public notice sign to post on property I own and/or represent that is being considered by the City of Clearwater for annexation, land use plan amendment and/or rezoning, and agree to post said sign on the subject property in a location where it is capable of being read from the most significant adjacent street a minimum of 10 days before the Community Development Board Meeting. Property Owner or Authorized Representative: JV1.Ja h K � in C4 Print Name • Date Community Development Board Meeting Date: • December 19, 2017 City Council Public Hearing Dates: • January 18, 2018 (1St reading) • February 1, 2018 (2nd reading) The sign shall be posted on the property no later than: December 9, 2017 it CITY OF C L E A R W A T E R PLkNNiNG & DEVELOP,VIENT DEPART-NiENP s� POST Oma Boa 4748, CLEARWATER, .FLORIDA 3375&4748 "1 q�S ,� MUNICIPAL SERVICES BunDL-%, 100 SOUPfl Myna AyENUE, CLEARVVATER, FLORIDA 33756 �9 TELEPHONE (7277) 562-4567 Conditions Associated with LUP2017-10011 300 S DUNCAN AVE The following conditions must be satisfied before the permit can be processed. Status Engineering Review Ivan Dimitrov 727-562-4779 10/20/2017 Please see Engineering conditions associated with Not Met FLD2017-09018. Parks and Recreation Review Debbie Reid 562-4818 10/23/2017 Please see P&R conditions associated with FLD2017- Not Met 09018. Planning Review Lauren Matzke 562-4547 10/25/2017 1. Community Development Code Section 4-603.F.2 Not Met requires that the amendment is not inconsistent with provisions of the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed amendment is inconsistent with the following Comprehensive Plan policies: (a) Policy A.2.2.8 requires commercial land uses to be located at the intersection of arterial or collector streets. The proposed amendment area is not located on an arterial or collector street. And the parcel overall (inclusive of the portion already designated R/OG on the future land use map and zoned Commercial (C) District) is not located at an intersection. (b) Policy A.5.5.1 states that development should be designed to maintain and support the existing or envisioned character of the neighborhood. Both South Duncan Avenue north of Gulf to Bay Boulevard and Rainbow Drive are primarily residential and office uses. Be advised that these inconsistencies are an issue in staff recommending approval. Print Date: 10/27/2017 Page: 1 of 2 CaseConditions "EQuat EMPLOYMENT AND AFr'IRmArr4'E ACTION ENIPLOYER" The following conditions must be satisfied before the permit can be processed Planning Review Lauren Matzke 562-4547 10/25/2017 2. Community Development Code Section 4-603.F.3 requires that the available uses are compatible with existing and planned uses in the area. The requested. amendment to Commercial General (CG) future land use and Commercial (C) District does not comply with this standard. While the properties to the east are zoned Commercial, the character of uses are office and multi- family. The amendment area is primarily surrounded by: single-family residential (north), single-family residential, small-scale multi -family residential, and low -intensity office uses (converted single-family residential) (east); and low -scale offices (west), currently designated Residential/Office General (R/OG), same as the amendment area. Commercial development is limited to buildings along Gulf -to -Bay Boulevard, which is a major commercial corridor, appropriate for larger -scale commercial uses. Applications for Future Land Use Map and Zoning Atlas amendments may not be conditioned to limit the development to a certain use; therefore, evaluations regarding the compatibility must be weighed based on maximum development potential established by the future land use and the range of uses available through the requested zoning. Be advised that this incompatibility is an issue in staff recommending approval. Planning Review Lauren Matzke 562-4547 Status Not Met 10/25/2017 3. For CDB Submittal, remove all references to the Not Met Transfer of Development Rights currently found within the application. Stormwater Review Ivan Dimitrov 727-562-4779 10/20/2017 Please see Stormwater Engineering conditions associated with FLD2017-09018. Print Date: 10/27/2017 Page: 2 of 2 "EQUAL Empw-T tEN'r AND AFFIRM rIvE AMON EMPLOYER" Not Met CaseConditions October 10, 2017 City of Clearwater Clearwater Planning & Development, Post Office Box 4748, Clearwater, Florida 33758-4748 100 South Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone (727) 562-4567 Fax (727) 562-4865 Brian J. Aungst, Esq. Macfarlane, Ferguson & McMullen 625 Court Street, Suite 200 Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: Case #LUP2017-10011: Application for Comprehensive Plan Amendment Case #REZ2017-10012: Application for Zoning Atlas Amendment Portion of Parcel #14-29-15-00000-130-0200 located at 300 S. Duncan Avenue Dear Mr. Aungst: The City of Clearwater Planning & Development Department has reviewed the above referenced applications requesting a future land use amendment from Residential/Office General (R/OG) to Commercial General (CG) and a rezoning from the Office (0) District to the Commercial (C) District for a portion of the property located at 300 S. Duncan Avenue. The applications have been entered into the Department's filing system and assigned the case numbers LUP2017-10011 and REZ2017-10012, respectively. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff determined that the applications are complete. The following review schedule is tentatively established for the applications. Should there be a change to a meeting time or location, the City will contact you immediately. The owner or owner's agent is required to attend the Development Review Committee, Community Development Board, and City Council meetings. The case will be forwarded to the Community Development Board upon being deemed sufficient by the City. 11/2/2017 Development Review Committee Meeting Time TBD* Municipal Services Building, 2nd floor Planning & Development Department, Conference Room 216 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL *Please call Sherry Watkins at 727.562.4582 no earlier than one week prior to the meeting for the approximate time of the case review. George N. Cretelaos, Mayor Doreen Caudell, Councilmember Bill Jonson, Counc bnember Dr. Bob Cundlff, Counalrnember 4' Hoyt Hamilton, Councllmernber T. 'Equal Employment and AffumatI Action Employer" 12/19/2017 Community Development Board Meeting 1:00 PM City Hall Council Chambers, 3rd Floor 112 S. Osceola Avenue, Clearwater, FL January City Council Public Hearing (first reading) 2018 TBD* City Hall Council Chambers, 3rd Floor 6:00 PM 112 S. Osceola Avenue, Clearwater, FL * City Council calendar is not adopted at this time February City Council Public Hearing (second reading) 2018 TBD* City Hall Council Chambers, 3rd Floor 6:00 PM 112 S. Osceola Avenue, Clearwater, FL * City Council calendar is not adopted at this time If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4547 or at lauren.matzke@myclearwater.com. Sincerely, um�"��k Lauren Matzke, AICP Long Range Planning Manager October 4, 2017 City of Clearwater Clearwater Planning & Development, Post Office Box 4748, Clearwater, Florida 33758-4748 100 South Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone (727) 562-4567 Fax (727) 562-4865 Brian J. Aungst, Esq. Macfarlane, Ferguson & McMullen 625 Court Street, Suite 200 Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: Case #LUP2017-10011: Application for Comprehensive Plan Amendment Case #REZ2017-10012: Application for Zoning Atlas Amendment Portion of Parcel #14-29-15-00000-130-0200 located at 300 S. Duncan Avenue Dear Mr. Aungst: The City of Clearwater Planning & Development Department has reviewed the above referenced applications requesting a future land use amendment from Residential/Office General (R/OG) to Commercial General (CG) and a rezoning from the Office (0) District to the Commercial (C) District for a portion of the property located at 300 S. Duncan Avenue. The applications have been entered into the Department's filing system and assigned the case numbers LUP2017-10011 and REZ2017-10012, respectively. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff determined that the applications are incomplete. The following items and/or information are required in order to make your application for Comprehensive Plan Amendment complete: 1. Legal Description: Confirm the legal description listed on Page 1 of the application is only for that portion of the parcel requested to be amended (application states 2.811 acres) 2. Property Designations: Because only a portion of the site proposed to be amended, "present" designations on Page 2 of the application should only list the designation on that portion or the parcel. The present and requested Countywide Plan Map category is not listed. 2.811 acres site area is 122,447 SF, which differs from what is listed on the application — confirm all calculations and acreage match. Current allowable density/intensity should not include the additional development potential from the requested TDR; please include GSF both with and without the proposed TDR under proposed. 3. Response to review standard 1 regarding consistency with the City's Comprehensive Plan does not reference any goals, objectives or policies of the Plan. Response to review standard 3 does not address the uses on South Duncan Avenue or Rainbow Drive, on which the proposed amendment area is located. George N. Cretd w% Ma)w Doreen Caudell, Comcilmernber AdEML Btll Jonson, Councilmember Dr. Bob Cundiff, Councibmember Hoyt Harniltm Cmuncilmernber 4P `Equal Employment and Affirmative Actton Moyer" 4. The survey provided is for the entire parcel, but does not delineate the portion of the parcel proposed to be amended or provide a legal description of said portion. A sketch and legal description to supplement the parcel survey should be provided. 5. It is not necessary to provide a survey for the parcel associated with the TDR application as part of this application. The following items and/or information are required in order to make your application for Zoning Atlas Amendment complete: 1. Legal Description: Conium the legal description listed on Page 1 of the application is only for that portion of the parcel requested to be amended (application states 2.811 acres) 2. Property Designations: Because only a portion of the site proposed to be amended, "present" designations on Page 2 of the application should only list the designation on that portion. 2.811 acres site area is 122,447 SF, which differs from what is listed on the application — confirm all calculations and acreage match. Current allowable density/intensity should not include the additional development potential from the requested TDR; please include GSF both with and without the proposed TDR under proposed. 3. This application did not include page 4 response to review standards; consider previous comments regarding the application for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment where applicable, for the appropriate Zoning Atlas amendment criteria. 4. The survey provided is for the entire parcel, but does not delineate the portion of the parcel proposed to be amended or provide a legal description of said portion. A sketch and legal description to supplement the parcel survey should be provided. 5. It is not necessary to provide a survey for the parcel associated with the TDR application as part of this application. Section 4-202(C) of the Community Development Code states that if an application is deemed incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff. No further development review action shall be taken until the deficiencies are corrected and the applications are deemed complete. Please submit the above information by 12:00 noon on Thursday, October 11, 2017 in order to keep these applications on schedule for the November 2, 2017 Development Review Committee meeting. Please note that additional comments may be forthcoming during sufficiency review. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4547 or at lauren.matzke@myclearwater.com. Sincerely, Lauren Matzke, AICP Long Range Planning Manager Matzke, Lauren From: JoAnna Siskin <siskinj54@gmail:com> Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2018 7:55 PM To: Matzke, Lauren Subject: [POSSIBLE SPAM] Fwd: 300 S Duncan ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: JoAnna Siskin <siskini54Ca@gmail.com> Date: Tue, Apr 3, 2018, 7:46 PM Subject: 300 S Duncan To:<lauren.matzke@myclrearwater.com> Ms. Matzke, I am writing on behalf of the Skycrest Association in reference to the proposed land -use and zoning changes of 300 South Duncan to commercial. This neighborhood is not opposed to responsible and sustainable development or redevelopment that fits the character of our neighborhood. We Believe that the office / residential land use and zoning should be kept in place. We are in full agreement with the professionals in the city's planning department that the change to a commercial designation would not be appropriate or in the best interest of our neighborhood or the city, and that the Council will agree. JoAnna Siskin President Skycrest Neighbors December 18, 2017 Ms. Matzke, My Name is JoAnna Siskin and I am President of the Skycrest Neighborhood Assoc. I am writing on behalf of the neighborhood about the proposed project for 300 S Duncan. The neighborhood does not support the proposed change in land use and zoning for a storage facility. We feel it is not an appropriate project so close to a residential area. Such a large facility would be more suited to a warehouse or industrial district. Thank you for your attention to this matter, Sincerely, JoAnna Siskin President Skycrest Neighbors EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A REPORT OF THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF 300 S DUNCAN AVE - OFFICE BLDG IN PINELLAS COUNTY, FL December 14, 2017 Prepared by: City of Clearwater Economic Development Department P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 '� w FL ARWATER I�Z7 - - cHT XqD ATAVnML-DAYTQMACH Prepared using Total Impact ■■: ■ IMPACT ■ ■■' DataSour ce 00000 PURPOSE & LIMITATIONS This report presents the results of an analysis undertaken by the City Economic Development Department using Total Impact, an economic an( analysis tool developed and supported by the Austin, TX based economic c Impact DataSource. The Total Impact model is a customized software program licensed t Clearwater Economic Development Department. The model includ assumptions, and other information developed by Impact DataSOL independent research effort detailed in City of Clearwater Economic Department's Total Impact User Guide. The analysis relies on prospective estimates of business activity that may n City of Clearwater Economic Development Department made reasonable of that the project -specific data entered into the Total Impact model rE estimates of future activity. No warranty or representation is made by City of Clearwater Economic Department or Impact DataSource that any of the estimates or results co study will actually be achieved. W.as'lll Data Executive Summary Total Impact 12 F I pedwI jejoi ijewwnS aniln:)ax3 CONTENTS Economic Impact Introduction....................................................................................................... Description of the Project................................................................................ Existing & Expanded Operations.................................................................... Economic Impact Overview............................................................................. Temporary Construction Impact..................................................................... Fiscal Impact Fiscal Impact Overview..................................................................................... Cityof Clearwater........................................................................................ PinellasCounty............................................................................................ Pinellas County Public Schools................................................................. Benefits for Other Taxing Districts............................................................ Methodology Overview of Methodology.............................................................................. About Impact DataSource............................................................................... Executive Summary Total Impact 14 300 S DUNCAN AVE - OFFICE BLDG I ECONOMIC Introduction This report presents the results of an economic impact analysis performed using Total Impact, a model developed by DataSource. The report estimates the impact that a potential project in Pinellas County will have on the local econom estimates the costs and benefits for local taxing districts over a 10 -year period. Description of the Project Evaluation of current condition. Employment figures are estimated based on median wages of professional office anc occupancy/SF rentable building area. Assumptions: Professional, Scientific & Technical Services; wages equal average for Pinellas County as published by Enterprise Florida on January 1, 2017. Occupancy at 90% to yield employment of Existing & Expanded Operations The Project under analysis represents the expansion of an existing company in Pinellas County. The existing operatioi currently support 185.0 direct jobs in the community and 196.3 indirect and induced jobs. The direct workers earn $4 year and the company supports $2.6 million per year in taxable sales and spending in the community. Additionally, tt supports taxable property valued at $2.2 million annually. The table below illustrates the company's economic impact over the next 10 years - including both the existing and e operations. Table 1. Economic Impact of Existing and Expanded Operations Over the Next 10 Years Executive Summary Total Impact 15 Existing Operations Expansion Existing & Expanded Ops Jobs Direct 185.0 0.0 185.0 Indirect & Induced 196.3 0.0 196.3 Total 381.3 0.0 381.3 Salaries Direct $92,351,589 $0 $92,351,589 Indirect &Induced $53,693,214 $0 $53,693,214 Total $146,044,803 $0 $146,044,803 Taxable Sales Direct $16,207,704 $0 $16,207,704 Indirect & Induced $9,423,159 $0 $9,423,159 Total $25,630,863 $0 $25,630,863 Executive Summary Total Impact 15 Executive Summary Total Impact 16 300 S DUNCAN AVE - OFFICE BLDG I ECONOMIC The tables below illustrates the company's fiscal impact - the net benefits for local taxing districts - over the next 10 yE including both the existing and expanded operations. Table 2. Fiscal Impact of Existing and Expanded Operations Over the Next 10 Years Net Benefits The remainder of this report will focus on only the economic and fiscal impact associated with the expanded operatic Economic Impact Overview The Project's operations will support employment and other economic impacts in the community. The 0.0 workers dii employed by the Project will earn approximately $47,000 per year on average over the next 10 years. This direct actio support 0.0 indirect and induced workers in the community earning $0 on average over the next 10 years. The total additional payroll or workers' earnings associated with the Project is estimated to be approximately $0.0 million over next 10 years. Accounting for various taxable sales and purchases, including activity associated with the Project, worker spending, a spending in the community, the Project is estimated to support approximately $0.0 million in taxable sales over the n years. Table 3. Economic Impact Over the Next 10 Years Indirect & Direct Induced Number of permanent direct, indirect, and induced jobs to be created 0.0 0.0 Salaries to be paid to direct, indirect, and induced workers $0 $0 Taxable sales and purchases expected in the City $0 $0 Executive Summary Total Impact 17 Existing Existing & Operations Expansion Expanded Ops City of Clearwater $641,044 $0 $641,044 Pinellas County $280,243 $0 $280,243 Pinellas County Public Schools $172,280 $0 $172,280 Southwest Florida WMD $7,809 $0 $7,809 Transit District $17,656 $0 $17,656 Juvenile Welfare Board $21,143 $0 $21,143 Pinellas County Planning Council $353 $0 $353 Total $1,140,528 $0 $1,140,528 The remainder of this report will focus on only the economic and fiscal impact associated with the expanded operatic Economic Impact Overview The Project's operations will support employment and other economic impacts in the community. The 0.0 workers dii employed by the Project will earn approximately $47,000 per year on average over the next 10 years. This direct actio support 0.0 indirect and induced workers in the community earning $0 on average over the next 10 years. The total additional payroll or workers' earnings associated with the Project is estimated to be approximately $0.0 million over next 10 years. Accounting for various taxable sales and purchases, including activity associated with the Project, worker spending, a spending in the community, the Project is estimated to support approximately $0.0 million in taxable sales over the n years. Table 3. Economic Impact Over the Next 10 Years Indirect & Direct Induced Number of permanent direct, indirect, and induced jobs to be created 0.0 0.0 Salaries to be paid to direct, indirect, and induced workers $0 $0 Taxable sales and purchases expected in the City $0 $0 Executive Summary Total Impact 17 300 S DUNCAN AVE - OFFICE BLDG I ECONOMIC The Project may result in new residents moving to the community and potentially new residential properties being cc as summarized below. Table 4. Population Impacts Over the Next 10 Years Indirect & Direct Induced Number of direct, indirect, and induced workers who will move to the County 0.0 0.0 Number of new residents in the County 0.0 0.0 Number of new residential properties to be built in the County 0.0 0.0 Number of new students expected to attend local school district 0.0 0.0 The Project is estimated to support an average of approximately $0.0 million in new non-residential taxable property over the next 10 years. The taxable value of property supported by the Project over the 10 -year period is shown in th, table. The taxable value of residential property represents the value of properties that may be constructed as a result of nes moving to the community. This analysis assumes the residential real property appreciation rate to be 2.0% per year. The Project's real property is to appreciate at a rate of 2.0% per year. The analysis assumes the Project's furniture, fixtures, and equipment will dep over time according to the depreciation schedule shown in Appendix A. Executive Summary Total Impact 18 Table 5. Value of Taxable Property Supported by the Project Over the Next 10 Years The Project's Property New Buildings & Furniture, Subtotal Residential Other Real Prop. Fixtures, & Nonresidential Year Property Land Improvements Equipment Property 2017 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 2018 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 2019 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 2020 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 2021 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 2022 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 2023 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 2024 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 2025 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 2026 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 The taxable value of residential property represents the value of properties that may be constructed as a result of nes moving to the community. This analysis assumes the residential real property appreciation rate to be 2.0% per year. The Project's real property is to appreciate at a rate of 2.0% per year. The analysis assumes the Project's furniture, fixtures, and equipment will dep over time according to the depreciation schedule shown in Appendix A. Executive Summary Total Impact 18 300 S DUNCAN AVE - OFFICE BLDG I ECONOMIC Temporary Construction Impact The Project will include an initial period of construction where $0.0 million will be spent to construct new buildings ai property improvements. It is assumed that 50.0% of the construction expenditure will be spent on materials and 50.0 The temporary construction activity will support temporary economic impacts in the community in the form of temp( construction employment and sales for local construction firms. Table 5. Spending and Estimated Direct Employment Impact of Project -Related Construction Activity Amount Total construction expenditure $0 Materials $0 Labor $0 Temporary Construction Workers Supported (Average Earnings = $44,000) 0 The following table presents the temporary economic impacts resulting from the construction. Table 6. Temporary Economic Impact of Project -Related Construction Activity Indirect & Direct Induced Number of temporary direct, indirect, and induced job years to be supported* 0.0 0.0 Salaries to be paid to direct, indirect, and induced workers $0 $0 Revenues or sales for businesses related to construction $0 $0 *A job year is defined os full employment for one person for 2080 hours in a 12 -month span. Sales tax calculations related to construction activity are presented in the following table. The sales tax revenue gene[ construction -period taxable spending is included in the fiscal impact for affected districts in Year 1 of this analysis. Table 7. Construction -Related Taxable Spending Estimate Expenditure for Materials $0 Percent of Materials subject to local tax 50.0% Subtotal Taxable Materials Expenditure for Labor/ Paid to construction workers $0 Percent of gross earnings spent on taxable goods and services 27.0% Percent of taxable spending done locally 65.0% Subtotal Taxable Construction Worker Spending $0 Expenditure for Furniture, Fixtures, & Equipment (FF&E) $0 Percent of FF&E subject to local tax 65.0% Subtotal Taxable FF&E Purchases 50 Total Construction -Related Taxable Spending $0 The above construction analysis focuses on the impact resulting from the Project's construction investments identifie construction will be phased in over several years or an expansion is planned in a later year, parallel calculations will b for those years. Executive Summary Total Impact 19 Executive Summary Total Impact 110 300 S DUNCAN AVE -OFFICE BLDG I FISCAL IMP, Fiscal Impact Overview The Project will generate additional benefits and costs for local taxing districts, a summary of which is provided belov of specific benefits and costs are provided in greater detail for each taxing district on subsequent pages. Overall, the receive approximately $ in net benefits over the 10 -year period and the Project will generate $ in total for all local taxing districts. Table 8. Fiscal Net Benefits Over the Next 10 Years for Local Taxing Districts Present Net Value of Benefits Costs Benefits Net Benefits* City of Clearwater $0 $0 $0 $0 Pinellas County $0 $0 $0 $0 Pinellas County Public Schools $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Florida WMD $0 $0 $0 $0 Transit District $0 $0 $0 $0 Juvenile Welfare Board $0 $0 $0 $0 Pinellas County Planning Council $0 $0 $0 $0 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 * The Present Value of Net Benef is expresses the future stream of net benefits received over several years as a single value in today's dollars. TodaJ dollar to be received at differing times in the future are not comparable because of the time value of money. The time value of money is the interes taxing entity's discount rate. This analysis uses a discount rate of 5% to make the dollars comparable. Figure 1. Net Benefits Over the Next 10 Years for Local Taxing Districts City of Clearwater Pinellas County Pinellas County Public Schools Southwest Florida WMD Transit District Juvenile Welfare Board Pinellas County Planning Council Executive Summary Total Impact 111 300 S DUNCAN AVE - OFFICE BLDG I FISCAL IMP, City of Clea Rmater The table below displays the estimated additional benefits, costs, and net benefits to be received by the City over the years of the Project. Appendix C contains the year -by -year calculations. Table 9. City of Clearwater. Benefits, Costs, and Net Benefits Over the Next 10 Years Subtotal Benefits Amount Sales Taxes* $0 Property Taxes - Project $0 Tangible Taxes - Project $0 Property Taxes - New Residential $0 Utility Revenue $0 Utility Franchise Fees $0 Utility Taxes $0 Building Permits and Fees $0 Impact Fees $0 Miscellaneous Taxes & User Fees $0 Subtotal Benefits $00 Cost of Providing Municipal Services $0 Cost of Providing Utility Services $0 Subtotal Costs SO Net Benefits $0 Present Value (5% discount rate) $0 * Share of local option infrastructure surtax Figure 2. Annual Fiscal Net Benefits for the City of Clearwater 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Year 2023 2024 2025 Benefits Costs —Net Benefits Executive Summary Total Impact 112 300S DUNCAN AVE -OFFICE BLDG I FISCAL IMP, The City will rec@ive benefits from the activity, spending, and Investments associated with (1) the Project and (2) the v These benefits, associated costs, and resulting net benefits for the next 10 years are shown below for these two catec Table 10: Net Benefits to the City from the Project and Workers Net Benefits $0 $0 $0 Percent of Total Net Benefits 0.0% 0.0% * Share of focal option infrastructure surtax. Executive Summary Total Impact 113 The Project Workers Total Sales Taxes* $0 $0 $0 Property Taxes - Project $0 $0 $0 Tangible Taxes - Project $0 $0 $0 Property Taxes - New Residential $0 $0 $0 Utility Revenue $0 $0 $0 Utility Franchise Fees $0 $0 $0 Utility Taxes $0 $0 $0 Building Permits and Fees $0 $0 $0 Impact Fees $0 $0 $0 Miscellaneous Taxes & User Fees $0 $0 $0 Subtotal Benefits $0 5-0 $0 Cost of Providing Municipal Services $0 $0 $0 Cost of Providing Utility Services $0 $0 $0 Subtotal Costs $0 $0_ 5-0 Net Benefits $0 $0 $0 Percent of Total Net Benefits 0.0% 0.0% * Share of focal option infrastructure surtax. Executive Summary Total Impact 113 300 S DUNCAN AVE - OFFICE BLDG I FISCAL IMP, Pinellas County The table below displays the estimated additional benefits, costs, and net benefits to be received by the County over years of the Project. Appendix C contains the year -by -year calculations. Table 11. Pinellas County: Benefits, Costs, and Net Benefits Over the Next 10 Years Amount Sales Taxes* $0 Property Taxes - Project $0 Tangible Taxes - Project $0 Property Taxes - New Residential $0 Utility Taxes $0 Tourist Development Taxes $0 Building Permits and Fees $0 Impact Fees $0 Miscellaneous Taxes & User Fees $0 Subtotal Benefits $0 Cost of Providing County Services $0 Subtotal Costs 00 Net Benefits $0 Present Value (5% discount rate) $0 * Share of local option infrastructure surtax Figure 3. Annual Fiscal Net Benefits for Pinellas County 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Year =Benefits Em Costs —Net Benefits Executive Summary Total Impact 114 300 S DUNCAN AVE - OFFICE BLDG I FISCAL IMP, The County will receive benefit6 from the activity, spending, and Investments associated with (1) the Project and (2) tl These benefits, associated costs, and resulting net benefits for the next 10 years are shown below for these two catec Table 12: Net Benefits to the County from the Project and Workers * Share of local option infrastructure surtax. Pinellas County Public Schools The table below displays the estimated additional benefits, costs, and net benefits to be received by the school distric next 10 years of the Project. Appendix C contains the year -by -year calculations. Table 13. Pinellas County Public Schools: Benefits, Costs, and Net Benefits Over the Next 10 Years Amount Property Taxes - Project The Project Workers Total Sales Taxes* $0 $0 $0 Property Taxes - Project $0 $0 $0 Tangible Taxes - Project $0 $0 $0 Property Taxes - New Residential $0 $0 $0 Utility Taxes $0 $0 $0 Tourist Development Taxes $0 $0 $0 Building Permits and Fees $0 $0 $0 Impact Fees $0 $0 $0 Miscellaneous Taxes & User Fees $0 $0 $0 Subtotal Benefits $00 .L0 Cost of Providing County Services $0 $0 $0 Subtotal Costs 5-0 $0 5-0 Net Benefits $0 $0 $0 Percent of Total Net Benefits 0.0% 0.0% * Share of local option infrastructure surtax. Pinellas County Public Schools The table below displays the estimated additional benefits, costs, and net benefits to be received by the school distric next 10 years of the Project. Appendix C contains the year -by -year calculations. Table 13. Pinellas County Public Schools: Benefits, Costs, and Net Benefits Over the Next 10 Years Amount Property Taxes - Project $0 Tangible Taxes - Project $0 Property Taxes - New Residential $0 Additional State and Federal Funding $0 Subtotal Benefits $00 Cost of Educating New Students $0 Subtotal Costs $00 Net Benefits $0 Present Value (5% discount rate) $0 Executive Summary Total Impact 115 300 S DUNCAN AVE - OFFICE BLDG I FISCAL IMP, Benefits for Other Taxing Districts The table below displays the estimated additional property taxes to be received by other taxing districts over the nex the Project. Appendix C contains the year -by -year calculations. Present Value (5% discount rate) Executive Summary Total Impact 116 Table 14. Other Taxing Districts: Benefits Over the Next 10 Years Property Tangible Residential Taxes Taxes Property Taxes Southwest Florida WMD $0 $0 $0 Transit District $0 $0 $0 Juvenile Welfare Board $0 $0 $0 Pinellas County Planning Council $0 $0 $0 Benefits $0 $0 $0 Present Value (5% discount rate) Executive Summary Total Impact 116 300 S DUNCAN AVE - OFFICE BLDG I METHODOI Overview of Methodology This report presents the results of an analysis undertaken by the City of Clearwater Economic Development Departm( Impact, an economic and fiscal impact analysis tool developed and supported by the Austin, TX based economic con: Impact DataSource. The Total Impact model combines project -specific attributes with community data, tax rates, and assumptions to estii economic impact of the Project and the fiscal impact for local taxing districts over a 10 -year period. The economic impact as calculated in this report can be categorized into two main types of impacts. First, the direct ( impacts are the jobs and payroll directly created by the Project. Second, this economic impact analysis calculates the and induced impacts that result from the Project. Indirect jobs and salaries are created in new or existing area firms, s maintenance companies and service firms, that may supply goods and services for the Project. In addition, induced jc salaries are created in new or existing local businesses, such as retail stores, gas stations, banks, restaurants, and sery companies that may supply goods and services to new workers and their families. The economic impact estimates in this report are based on the Regional Input -Output Modeling System (RIMS II), a v regional input-output model developed by the U. S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis. The RIN model is a standard tool used to estimate regional economic impacts. The economic impacts estimated using the RIK are generally recognized as reasonable and plausible assuming the data input into the model is accurate or based on assumptions. Impact DataSource utilizes county -level multipliers to estimate the impact occurring at the sub -county Two types of regional economic multipliers were used in this analysis: an employment multiplier and an earnings mu employment multiplier was used to estimate the number of indirect and induced jobs created or supported in the are earnings multiplier was used to estimate the amount of salaries to be paid to workers in these new indirect and indu( The employment multiplier shows the estimated number of total jobs created for each direct job. The earnings multil the estimated amount of total salaries paid to these workers for every dollar paid to a direct worker. The multipliers u analysis are listed below: 540000 Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services City County Employment Multiplier (Type II Direct Effect) 1.6049 2.0612 Earnings Multiplier (Type H Direct Effect) 1.3314 1.5814 The fiscal impacts calculated in this report are detailed in Appendix C. Most of the revenues estimated in this study rE calculations relying on (1) attributes of the Project, (2) assumptions to derive the value of associated taxable property and (3) local tax rates. In some cases, revenues are estimated on a per new household, per new worker, or per new sc student basis. The company or Project developer was not asked, nor could reasonably provide data for calculating some other revel example, while the city and county will likely receive revenues State Shared Revenue, fuel taxes, various charges for sf and forfeitures but the company cannot identify these amounts. Therefore, some revenues are calculated using an av approach. This approach uses relies on two assumptions: 1. The taxing entity has two general revenue sources: revenues from residents and revenues from businesses. 2. The taxing entity will collect (a) about the same amount of miscellaneous taxes and user fees from each ne that results from the Project as it currently collects from existing households on average, and (b) the same an miscellaneous taxes and user fees from the new business (on a per worker basis) will be collected as it collect existing businesses. Executive Summary Total Impact 117 300 S DUNCAN AVE - OFFICE BLDG I METHODOI In the case of the school district, some additional state and federal revenues are estimated on a per new school stud( consistent with historical funding levels. Additionally, this analysis sought to estimate the additional expenditures faced by the city and county to provide ser` households and new businesses. A marginal cost approach was used to calculate these additional costs. This approac two assumptions: 1. The taxing entity spends money on services for two general groups: revenues from residents and revenues businesses. 2. The taxing entity will spend slightly less than its current average cost to provide local government services EMS, etc.) to (a) new residents and (b) businesses on a per worker basis. In the case of the school district, the marginal cost to educate new students was estimated based on a portion of the current expenditures per student and applied to the headcount of new school students resulting from the Project. About Impact DataSource Impact DataSource is an Austin economic consulting, research, and analysis firm founded in 1993. The firm has condi 2,500 economic impact analyses of firms, projects, and activities in most industry groups in Texas and more than 30 c In addition, Impact DataSource has prepared and customized more than 50 economic impact models for its clients tc their own analyses of economic development projects. These clients include the Metro Orlando (Florida) Economic D, Commission and the Frisco (Texas) Economic Development Corporation. Executive Summary Total Impact 118 APPROVAL OF LUP 2017-10011 AND REZ2017-10012 300 S. Duncan Ave./Gulf to Bay Blvd. Brian J. Aungst, Jr., Esq. Macfarlane Ferguson & McMullen, P.A. 625 Court Street, Suite 200 Clearwater, FL 33756 TABLE OF CONTENTS Land Use Amendment Application.................................................................................................1 RezoningApplication......................................................................................................................2 Zoning and Land Use Maps and Aerials..........................................................................................3 Pictures of current Office Development..........................................................................................4 Pictures of Proposed Commercial Development.............................................................................5 Market Conditions Opinion of Dennis Noto, MAI..........................................................................6 Downtown Master Plan Office Density Reserve Incentives............................................................7 US 19 Master Plan Office Incentives...............................................................................................8 Section 4-602 of the Community Development Code.....................................................................9 Resume of Jonathan Dorman, P.E.................................................................................................10 Resume of Dennis Noto, MAI.......................................................................................................11 Planning & Development Department -..:.: N:, �. •►k Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application Including Future Land Use Map Amendments ALL APPLICATIONS ARE TO BE FILLED OUT COMPLETELY AND CORRECTLY, AND SUBMITTED IN PERSON (NO FAX OR DELIVERIES) TO THE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY NOON ON THE SCHEDULED DEADLINE DATE. ONE (1) COMPLETE SET OF APPLICATION MATERIALS AS REQUIRED WITHIN IS TO BE SUBMITTED DIGITALLY (COMBINED INTO A SINGLE PDF FILE ONTO A CD/DVD/USB DRIVE) FOR REVIEW BY THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE. SUBSEQUENT SUBMITTAL FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD WILL REQUIRE 11 COMPLETE SETS OF APPLICATION MATERIALS PRINTED (1 ORIGINAL AND 10 COPIES) AND ONE (1) COMBINED DIGITAL COPY IN A MANNER CONSISTENT WITH THE ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL. PLANS AND APPLICATIONS ARE REQUIRED TO BE COLLATED, STAPLED AND FOLDED INTO SETS. IT 1S INCUMBENT UPON THE APPLICANT TO SUBMIT COMPLETE AND CORRECT INFORMATION. ANY MISLEADING, DECEPTIVE, INCOMPLETE OR INCORRECT INFORMATION MAY INVALIDATE YOUR APPLICATION. THE APPLICANT, BY FILING THIS APPLICATION, AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE. APPLICATION FEE: $885 Future Land Use Map Amendment only, includes Zoning Atlas Amendment $0 Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment APPLICATION TO AMEND: X FUTURE LAND USE MAP (select one) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (TEXT) PROPERTY OWNER (PER DEED): Rental Houses, LLC MAILING ADDRESS: 300 S. Duncan Ave., Suite 275, Clearwater, FL 33755 PHONE NUMBER: 727-461-7700 EMAIL: dee().tpare ntalhouses. corn AGENT OR REPRESENTATIVE: Brian J. Auncst. Jr., Esq. Macfarlane Ferguson & McMullen MAILING ADDRESS: 625 Court Street. Suite 200. Clearwater, FL 33757 PHONE NUMBER: 727-441-8966 EMAIL:bia anmacfar.com ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY (if applicable): PARCEL NUMBER(S): LEGAL DESCRIPTION: DESCRIPTION OF TEXT AMENDMENT (if applicable): Specifically identify the requested amendment to the Comprehensive Plan 300 S. Duncan Ave., Clearwater, FL 33755 PID 14-29-15-00000-130-0200 (northern portion only) See attached for legal description. N/A Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-5624567 Page 1 of 6 Revised 10/05/2016 Planning & Development Department �•t.:_ '°1`'' `` ;_l� Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application Including Future Land Use Map Amendments PLEASE ENSURE THAT THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS FILLED OUT, IN ITS ENTIRETY. FAILURE TO COMPLETE THIS FORM WILL RESULT IN YOUR APPLICATION BEING FOUND INCOMPLETE AND POSSIBLY DEFERRED UNTIL THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION CYCLE. FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATION PRESENT: R/OG (Residential / Office General) REQUESTED: CG (Commercial General) COUNTYWIDE. PLAN MAP_ CATEGORY PRESENT: Office REQUESTED: Retail and Services ZONING ptSTPC- T - -- PRESENT: _O REQUESTED: C F SITE AREA: FLU change 1222,�,4��5gg9 sq. ft. FLU change 2.811 acres (Total site = 3.198 acres) MAXIMUM ANPrYJINTEWSj : USE(S): Current/Existing Existing (currently on site Future Land Use(s): 61,229 gsf or previous use if vacant): 70,855 qsf Office Proposed Future Proposed (new use, if any; Land use(s): 67,352 gsf (80_,822 gsf w/TDR) Pius existing If to remain): Self storage with ancillary retail (units, rooms or beds per acre or non- residentio! square footage) FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATIONS FOR ALL ADJACENT PROPERTY: North: RU (Residential Urban, across street) South: CG (Commercial General) East: CG (Commercial General) West: CG (Commercial General) and R/OG (Residential / Office General) STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. Swom to and subscril3ed before me this _.� day of tome and/or by persona gy kn-awE+ has j A.presek produced 'as tifi ldencation. gn;x . eofpropertyo Notary publi:, _ My commission expiEL407) Qtt�Hvl J CORNELIUS s 45 EXPIREES July 29, 2018 floaideFt6ta &:.^.lce.cem Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727.562-4567 Page 2 of 5 Revised 1ti1051Z4fe Planning & Development Department � jt' :A*.�' ' .,!� ': Comprehensive Plan Amendment Standards for Review PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO EACH OF THE SIX (6) STANDARDS FOR REVIEW EXPLAINING HOW, IN DETAIL, THE CRITERION IS BEING COMPLIED WITH PER THIS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT. 1. The amendment will further implementation of the comprehensive plan consistent with the goals, policies and objectives contained in the plan. See attached for response. 2. The amendment is not inconsistent with other provisions of the comprehensive plan. The amendment is consistent with and furthers the implementation of comprehensive plan, and is consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives contained in the plan by redeveloping the property consistent with the commercial redevelopment pattern of Gulf to Bay Blvd. 3. The available uses, if applicable, to which the property may be put are appropriate to the property in question and compatible with existing and planned uses in the area. The existing uses to the east, south, and west are all commercial along Gulf to Bay Blvd. 4. Sufficient public facilities are available to serve the property. Compared to the existing office on the property, the proposed use of self storage will generate less traffic and consume less water and sanitary capacity. 5. The amendment will not adversely affect the natural environment. The proposed self storage development will have less impervious area than the existing office development. The stormwater management system also will be upgraded to meet current standards. There are no wetlands or other sensitive environmental features on the property. 6. The amendment will not adversely impact the use of property in the immediate area. Compared to the existing office on the property, the proposed use of self storage facility will eliminate all traffic flow to Rainbow Drive and provide an enhanced buffer for the single-family residential lots to the north. The secured, enclosed design of the facility will also have a significant, positive impact on vagrancy on the property. Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562.4567 Page 4 of 6 Revised 10/05/2016 Planning & Development Department Comprehensive Plan Amendment BRIGHT MIDHEAVMX*BAY9'0MACH Affidavit to Authorize. Agent/Representative 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed —PRINT full names: Rental Houses, LLQ _ By: Barrett Family Partnership I, LTD, its Manager 13 ►_ ivl mit'di a s( n�ra F a np`�r () g property: 2. That I am we are the owners an recor title holders of the following described 300 S. Duncan Ave., Clearwater FL 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for (describe request): For the north oortion of the property, change Future Land Use designation to Commercial General and Zoninr to Commercial District (the southern portion already has these designations). 4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: Jonathan Dorman StorCo_n Development, LLC as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; S. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. That (1/we vthe unoersiged authority, hereby cern that the foregoing is true and correct. Property poet ) Property Owner Property Owner - STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Property Owner BEFORE ME THE UNDERSIGNED, AN OFFICER DULY COMMISSIONED BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, 0 _ _ n_ THI5 �� _ DAY OF 201-7 �,at� { D L� 7S 42 WHO HAV G BEEN F1111,U SWORN j DEPOSED AND SAYS THAT HE/SHE FULLY UNDERSTANDS THE CONTENTS OF THE AFFIDAVIT THAT HE/SHE SIGNED. ; rS My Commission . CORNEWS 1MY COMMISSION OFF1.400d5 Notary Seal/Stamp Expires: _ .-- - - - ;.��_�"'"`-. '►fin �nrae ary e�.ocen" , Planning 6 Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tet: 727562.4567 Page 5 of 5 Revbed 1010 2610 Aid\n/h•i 1.i_-, sruarrrMmarw n-sAVM' erAce Planning & Development Department Comprehensive Plan Amendment Affidavit to Authorize Agent/Representative 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed —PRINT full names: Rental. Houses. LLC By: Barrett Family Partnersnhiip i, LTD, its Manager 2• That arrn/We arejthe owners ar►d recon title older(s) of the following described property: 300 S. Duncan Ave., Clearwater FL 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for (describe request): For the north portion of theproperty; chane Future Land Use designation to Commercial General and Zoning to Commercial District (the southem portion already has these designations). 4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: Brian J. Aungst, Jr., Esq. Macfarlane Ferguson & McMullen as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives In order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. That (1/we), t ndersigneduthorlty, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. Pra(>_rtyOw�ne// Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner _ — - --- — s STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS BEFORE ME THE UNDERSIGNED, AN OFFICER DULY COMMISSIONED BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, ON THIS DAY OF 7� � i _ • . �2 0 1'7 -• PERSONALLY APPEARED ��__•�_("f0/ U _R .• _____ ____,� WHO HAVING BEEN FIRST DULY SWORN DEPOSED AND SAYS THAT HE/SHE FULLY UNDERSTANDS THE CONTENTS OF THE AFFIDAVIT THAT HE/SHESIGNED. N y bl Signature My Commission Notary Seal/Stamp Expires: !A QS Coifs . �t7A • ' )• MY COMMISSION A Planning 6 Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FIL 4 1Std, 2016 marJ Page 5 of 5 1 l'� g_ —— SECTION 14 TOWNSHIP 29 SOWN RANGE 15 EAST PINELLAS COJNT" MORVA -Z I er0i ��ti en et i I 1 11. 14� !f A—Sam'' IvId . Z— AMC o' Crop D6 0,11-141 tie 1 fe .0 Ad ..0 le � I � w� .� Y,r 73i. .r,�,r '1 � M# t I#: 2012004993 BK: 17454 PG: 347, 01/06/2012 at 01:29 PM, RECORDING 1 PAGES $10.00 D DOC STAMP COLLECTION $0.70 KEN BURKE, CLERK OF COURT PINELLAS COUNTY, FL BY DEPUTY CLERK: CLKDMC4 QUITCLAIM DEED Return to: Enclosed self addressed stamped envelope Name: J B Management, Inc. Address: 300 S. Duncan Ave. Suite 275 Cleerwater. FL 33755 This Ntsbument Prepared by: Enka L. Ewa Proparty Appraisers Placer IdenUficudw (Folio) Number(s): 14/29/15/00000/130/0200 Legal Description: THIS QUIT(I" DEED, Executed this 23n° day of December, 2011, by first party Erika L. Barrett as Trustee -of the Erika L. Barrett Living Trust whose post office address is 900 S. Duncan Ave., Sulte 275, Clear grater, FL 33755 to second party, Rental Houses, LLC whose post oMfce addrose is 300 & Ouncen Ave., Sults 276, CWwwaler, FL 33755, Legal Description: From SE Corner of SW Y4 of NE 14 run W 393 ft(s) and N 50 Feet fim POB then W 60 feat drat N 588.5 Feet, thus► E 396.14 Feet, then S 309.5 Fest, then W 335.65 Feet, thea S 280 Fent to PO$ continue 3.21 AC (C) thoroof as recorded in Plat Book 8935, Page 271 of the Public 1%oords of Pinellas County, Florida. WITNESSETH, TIM the said first party, for and in consideration of the sum of $10.00, in hand release mOn said second id urao the said s second party fcrev �' ai claihereby m and demand which the sold fast party has In and to Ore following described lot, piece or parcel of land, situate, lying and being in the County of Pinellas, State of FkWa, to wit: To Hove and to Hob, the Same together with an and aktguiar the appurtenances t wwrito belonging or in anywise appertaining, and all the astma, right, ripe, huteres6 lien. equity and clabn whatsoever of the said first pally. efiher In Iaw or equity. to the only proper use. benefit and behoove of the said eeoorrd party forever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The sold test party has signed and seated these presents the day and year first above written, Signed, sealed and delivered In presence of: f tl.rr'".. �:'..� J+_ p MHt � Witness AQ2 tJ iZU M First Party Qt �. 3 Q . tT LdEia�G� Witness (� fl no C.$mmd Party STATE OF FLOPJOA COUNTY OF PINELLINS I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day, before mei an officer duly authorized In the ftw aforesaid and In the County aforesaid to We adcnowiedignants, personally appeared Erika L. 13wmd (personally known), being duly sworn, and) to me known to be the person the person describe In and wfc+ executed the f ragaing hist umer-4 and who take an cafdr. WITNESS my hand end dflo al seal M the Courcy and State Iasi aroresshf this 23'0 day d December.. 2011. Aly CommNsion EVInim: 3121112015 11111tUf11LltA1tliQ �� "s_ � w tsar • p1Y rxlMAq Notary Pubilc ter prr.a. t'rrirce liar a. train awr.wwe e � anso tit�rrt awn rrpr SECTION 14 TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH RANGE 15 EAST u P,NELLA5 COUNTY F10RIOs11Am r I rl ➢ sXT ,1,11 i of 1 I VolV1 l I - _. ♦w �i � Ike � � �_ i aE a;.,. I r kjw •1 I , 9:. W .._ • w 1 , 1 „ II I ....� " .. •– I � 1y�' �. j _ .� !r — �G. 9C .01 -II1 �; IIIIIiI�f l rllll,l111112s, �, _ I rN 1, / LI 1-4 w Row it SIR LUP2017-10011 - Gulf to Bay Self Storage Responses to Comprehensive Plan Amendment Standards for Review 1. The comprehensive land use amendment furthers the goals, objectives, and policies of the Comprehensive Plan by providing a sufficient variety and amount of future land use categories and accommodating public demand and promoting infill redevelopment. See Goal A.2. The amendment will allow for the development of a self -storage facility subject of the contemporaneously filed FLD2017-09018. The project will be a commercial land use and shall be located at the intersection of arterial or collector street (Gulf to Bay Blvd.) and will be sited in such a way as to minimize the intrusion of off-site impacts into residential neighborhoods. See Policy A.2.2.8. The project will provide for safe on- site traffic circulation and connections to adjacent arterial and collector streets consistent with Florida Department of Transportation, Institute of Traffic Engineers design guidelines, and other applicable roadway design standards, policies, and guidelines. See Policy A.2.2.11. The redevelopment will meet the safety, environmental, and aesthetic needs of the city pursuant to Goal A.3. The redevelopment will be supported by the available community and public facilities that are required to serve the development pursuant to Goal A.4. The redevelopment will support the character of the surrounding commercial properties consistent with Policies A.5.3 and A.5.4. The redevelopment will promote high quality design standards that support Clearwater's image and contribute to its identity consistent with Policy A.5.5. The redevelopment is innovative planned development that accomplishes infill development that is consistent and compatible with the surrounding environment pursuant to Policy A.6.2. The existing uses to the east, south, and west are all Commercial General. The uses to the north are LMDR. The subject site is currently a mixed use of Commercial General and Residential/Office General. The amendment will make the site's use consistent with the surrounding uses that front Gulf to Bay and abut Rainbow Drive. Page 1 of 1 SKETCH & DESCRIPTION A parcel of land in the SW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 14, Township 29 South, Range 15 East, Pinellas County, Florida, further described as follows: Start at the SE corner of the SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 14, Township 29 South, Range 15 East, and go N 01 degrees 11'31" W, along the 40 acre line, 50.14 feet; thence go N 88 degrees 47'06" W, 58.31 feet to the point of intersection of the West right-of-way line of Duncan Avenue and the North right-of-way line of Gulf to Bay Boulevard; thence N 00 degrees 33'28" W, along the West right-of-way line of Duncan Avenue, 280.00 feet to the Point of Beginning of this description; thence N 88 degrees 47'06" W, 395.63 feet; thence N 00 degrees 39' 25" W, 308.52 feet to a point on the South right-of-way line of Rainbow Drive; thence S 88 degrees 56'09" E, along the South right-of-way line of Rainbow Drive, 396.14 feet to a point of intersection with the West right-of-way line of Duncan Avenue; thence S 00 degrees 33'28" E, along the West right-of-way line -of Duncan Avenue 309.54 feet to the Point of Beginning. CONTAINING: 2.811 ACRES. MORE OR LESS. 1. BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF GULF TO BAY BOULEVARD, HAVING A GRID BEARING OF NORTH 88'43'42" WEST. 2. THERE MAY BE ADDITIONAL EASEMENTS, RESTRICTIONS, AND/OR MATTERS NOT SHOWN ON THIS SURVEY WHICH MAY BE FOUND IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF THIS COUNTY. 3. THIS SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER. 4. THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURY 5. BEARINGS AND DISTANCES ARE MEASURED AND RECORDED (R). SKETCH & LEGAL DESCRIPTION PROPOSEI) REZONING PARCEL LW , � {� III FOREST LAKES OWLEVARD QLDSMAR, FLORIDA 34577 LB BOM" TOPORAORC - 000"T&I STAKWJT Pfl: (813) 854-134 2WINWAY ASAY.14tt3IA1 SHEET 1 OF 2 I thereby certify that the SKETC herom was prepared urtder do)) show at y lath b the FLORIDA BOARD fl MAPPERS in Chapter 34-17, fL pursuant to Section 472.027,_f KELLY O.WcCLUNG PROFESSOW 16VE10 and MAPPER j � t `` c aiAit SKETCH & DESCRIPTION S88'56'09"E 396.14' (R) S880 53'14"E 396.64' 00 SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE in Co OF RAINBOW DRIVE N d ^ 00 M W O W 00 3 CO MN N M PORTION TO BE REZONED o 0 M o W 0 O O z ZLoLo of of POINT OF BEGINNING 395.63' N88'47'06"W (R) 395.82'N880 46'54"W W ^ z Of J 3M In LL 4 O MQ d U =m 00 z 2 U. 0 z 2 UU N88'47'06"W zN o o A 58.31' (R) Lu a O o N88' 47' 16"W m 0000 58.19' GULF -TO -BAY BOULEVARD N1'11'31 "W (R) NO ° 07'39"W �� 50.14' '�— 40 acre line POINT OF COMMENCEMENT (NOT FOUND) SE CORNER OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST SHEET 2 OF 2 SKETCH & LEGAL DESCRIPTION PROPOSED REZONING PARCEL PROJECT NO. 17064 DRAWING# 17064 SCALE 1"-100' SlA� l FORE LAPD &S AR QVC. DATE DRAWN ,. a/KM 111 FOREST LAKES OULEVARD CHECKED/QC KKM Q OLDSMAR, FLORIDA 34677 FIELD CREW WA LB 4W BOUNDARY :TOPOGRAPHIC-CONSTRUCDONSiAKEOUTBK. PG. WA PH: (813) W-1342 9 -SIM Y0TAMPABAYARC0II SURVEY DATE WA ��] DEWYN71 I =,-*I 9 Ao�� October 6, 2017 Ms. Lauren Matzke, AICP, Manager City of Clearwater Planning & Development 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 Re: LUP2017-10011 (Comprehensive Plan Amendment), and REZ2017-10012 (Zoning Atlas Amendment) Gulf to Bay Self Storage, 300 S. Duncan Avenue Dear Ms. Matzke: We are writing in response to your letter of Incompleteness for the subject application, dated October 4, 2017. A listing of your comments and our responses (in italics) is provided below: Comprehensive Plan Amendment 1. Legal Description: Confirm the legal description listed on Page 1 of the application is only for that portion of the parcel requested to be amended (application states 2.811 acres). Response: The application has been revised to reference the supplemental sketch and description of only the area to be amended. 2. Property Designations: Because only a portion of the site is proposed to be amended, "present" designations on Page 2 of the application should list only the designation on that portion or the parcel. The present and requested Countywide Plan Map category is not listed. 2.811 acres site area is 122,447 SF, which differs from what is listed on the application — confirm all calculations and acreage match. Current allowable density / intensity should not include the additional development potential from the requested TDR; please include GSF both with and without the proposed TDR under proposed. Response: The application has been revised to show the present designation of only the area to be amended, and the Countywide Plan Map designations have been added. 122,459 SF is the correct parcel area, which equals 2.811 acres when rounded to the nearest thousandth of an acre. The GSF figures have been revised as requested. 3. Response to review standard 1 regarding consistency with the City's Comprehensive Plan does not reference any goals, objectives or policios of the flan. Response to review standard 3 does not address 8437 Tuttle Ave, #412, Sarasota. FL 34243 (813) 310-8520 (813) 436-5466 Fax ion.dorman(a hotmail.com Gulf to Bay Self Storage, October 6, 2017 the uses on South Duncan Avenue or Rainbow Drive, on which the proposed amendment area is located. Response: The application has been revised to incorporate the following: The comprehensive land use amendment furthers the goals, objectives, and policies of the Comprehensive Plan by providing a sufficient variety and amount of future land use categories and accommodating public demand and promoting infill redevelopment. See Goal A.2. The amendment will allow for the development of a self -storage facility subject of the contemporaneously tiled FLD2017-09018. The project will be a commercial land use and shall be located at the intersection of arterial or collector street (Gulf to Bay Blvd.) and will be sited in such a way as to minimize the intrusion of off-site impacts into residential neighborhoods. See Policy A.2.2. 8. The project will provide for safe on- site traffic circulation and connections to adjacent arterial and collector streets consistent with Florida Department of Transportation, Institute of Trak Engineers design guidelines, and other applicable roadway design standards, policies, and guidelines. See Policy A.2.2.11. The redevelopment will meet the safety, environmental, and aesthetic needs of the city pursuant to Goal A.3. The redevelopment will be supported by the available community and public facilities that are required to serve the development pursuant to Goal A.4. The redevelopment will support the character of the surrounding commercial properties consistent with Policies A.5.3 and A.5.4. The redevelopment will promote high quality design standards that support Clearwater's image and contribute to its identity consistent with Policy A.5.5. The redevelopment is innovative planned development that accomplishes infill development that is consistent and compatible with the surrounding environment pursuant to Policy A. 6.2. The existing uses to the east, south, and west are all Commercial General. The uses to the north are LMDR. The subject site is currently a mixed use of Commercial General and ResidentlayOffice General. The amendment will make the site's use consistent with the surrounding uses that front Gulf to Bay and abut Rainbow Drive. 4. The survey provided is for the entire parcel, but does not delineate the portion of the parcel proposed to be amended or provide a legal description of said portion. A sketch and legal description to supplement the parcel survey should be provided. Response: The requested supplemental sketch and legal description are enclosed. 5. It is not necessary to provide a survey for the parcel associated with the TDR application as part of this application. Response: Noted, Page 2 of 5 Gulf to Bay Self Storage, October 6, 2017 uc Zoning Atlas Amendment 1. Legal Description: Confirm the legal description listed on Page 1 of the application is only for that portion of the parcel requested to be amended (application states 2.811 acres). Response: The application has been revised to reference the supplemental sketch and description of only the area to be amended. 2. Property Designations: Because only a portion of the site is proposed to be amended, "present" designations on Page 2 of the application should list only the designation on that portion. 2.811 acres site area is 122,447 SF, which differs from what is listed on the application — confirm all calculations and acreage match. Current allowable density / intensity should not include the additional development potential from the requested TDR; please include GSF both with and without the proposed TDR under proposed. Response: The application has been revised to show the present designation of only the area to be amended. 122,459 SF is the correct parcel area, which equals 2.811 acres when rounded to the nearest thousandth of an acre. The GSF figures have been revised as requested. 3. The application did not include page 4 response to review standards; consider previous comments regarding the application for Comprehensive Plan Amendment where applicable, for the appropriate Zoning Atlas amendment criteria. Response: The application has been revised to incorporate the following: The proposed amendment is consistent with and furthers the goals, policies and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan and furthers the purposes of the Community Development Code and other City ordinances and actions designed to implement the Plan in the following ways: The zoning atlas amendment furthers the goals, objectives, and policies of the Comprehensive Plan by providing a sufficient variety and amount of future land use categories and accommodating public demand and promoting infill redevelopment. See Goal A.2. The amendment will allow for the development of a self -storage facility subject of the contemporaneously filed FLD2017- 09018. The project will be a commercial zoning and shall be located at the intersection of arterial or collector street (Gulf to Bay Blvd.) and will be sited in such a way as to minimize the intrusion of off-site impacts into residential neighborhoods. See Policy A.2.2.8. The project will provide for safe on-site traffic circulation and connections to adjacent arterial and collector streets consistent with Florida Department of Transportation, Institute of Traffic Engineers design guidelines, and other applicable roadway design standards, policies, and guidelines. See Policy A.2.2.11. The redevelopment will meet the safety, environmental, and aesthetic needs of the city pursuant Page 3 of 5 .,�.E�kC�- Gulf to Bay Self Storage, October 6, 2017 to Goal A.3. The redevelopment will be supported by the available community and public facilities that are required to serve the development pursuant to Goal A.4. The redevelopment will support the character of the surrounding commercial properties consistent with Policies A.5.3 and A.5.4. The redevelopment will promote high quality design standards that support Clearwater's image and contribute to its identity consistent with Policy A.5.5. The redevelopment is innovative planned development that accomplishes infill development that is consistent and compatible with the surrounding environment pursuant to Policy A.6.2. 2. The available uses to which the property may be put are appropriate to the property which is subject to the proposed amendment and compatible with existing and planned uses in the area. The existing uses to the east, south, and west are all Commercial General. The uses to the north are LMDR. The subject site is currently a mixed use of Commercial General and Residential/Office General. The amendment will make the site's use consistent with the surrounding uses that front Gulf to Bay and abut Rainbow Drive. This site will be developed as a self -storage facility which is the subject of the contemporaneously filed FLO 2017-09018. 3. The amendment does not conflict with the needs and character of the neighborhood and city. The zoning is consistent with the commercial redevelopment pattern of Gulf to Bay Blvd. The project is design as to mitigate the impact on the residential street to the north and will not conflict with the needs or character of the surrounding properties. 4. The amendment will not adversely or unreasonably affect the use of other property in the area. Compared to the existing office on the property, the proposed use of self -storage facility will eliminate all traffic flow to Rainbow Drive and provide an enhanced buffer for the single-family residential lots to the north. The secured, enclosed design of the facility will also have a significant, positive impact on vagrancy on the property. 5. The amendment will not adversely burden public facilities, including the traffic -carrying capacities of streets, in an unreasonably or disproportionate manner. Compared to the existing office on the property, the proposed use of self -storage will generate less traffic and consume less water and sanitary capacity. 6. The district boundaries are appropriately drawn with due regard to the locations and classifications of streets, ownership lines, existing improvements and the natural environment. The rezoning is restricted to one parcel that is currently a mixed -zoned parcel. The amendment will make the zoning of the parcel consistent with the other adjacent parcels zoned commercial. The proposed self - storage development will have less impervious area than the existing office development. The stormwater management system also will Page 4 of 6 Gulf to Bay Self Storage, October 6, 2017 be upgraded to meet current standards. There are no wetlands or other sensitive environmental features on the property. 4. It is not necessary to provide a survey for the parcel associated with the TDR application as part of this application. Response: Noted. We trust the above responses and supplement information address your requirements to proceed with the review and approval of this application, but please feel free to contact me at ion.dormar (ED-hotmail.com or 813-310- 8520 with any questions you may have. Sincerely yours, Jonathan Dorman, P.E. : jmd Enclosure: Sketch & Description, Revised Application Forms cc: Brian Aungst, Macfarlane Ferguson & McMullen Page 5 of 5 2 c" ti ,,,. 1'► + i Planning & Development Department F� j IINN :tt 111 N) al —'1 t N 4. 11.14 .1 11 `j Zoning Atlas Amendment Application ALL APPLICATIONS ARE TO BE FILLED OUT COMPLETELY AND CORRECTLY, AND SUBMITTED IN PERSON (NO FAX OR DELIVERIES) TO THE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY NOON ON THE SCHEDULED DEADLINE DATE. ONE (1) COMPLETE SET OF APPLICATION MATERIALS AS REQUIRED WITHIN IS TO BE SUBMITTED DIGITALLY (COMBINED INTO A SINGLE PDF FILE ONTO A CD/DVD/USB DRIVE) FOR REVIEW BY THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE. SUBSEQUENT SUBMITTAL FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD WILL REQUIRE it COMPLETE SETS OF APPLICATION MATERIALS PRINTED (1 ORIGINAL AND 10 COPIES) AND ONE (1) COMBINED DIGITAL COPY IN A MANNER CONSISTENT WITH THE ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL. PLANS AND APPLICATIONS ARE REQUIRED TO BE COLLATED, STAPLED AND FOLDED INTO SETS. IT IS INCUMBENT UPON THE APPLICANT TO SUBMIT COMPLETE AND CORRECT INFORMATION. ANY MISLEADING, DECEPTIVE, INCOMPLETE OR INCORRECT INFORMATION MAY INVALIDATE YOUR APPLICATION. THE APPLICANT, BY FILING THIS APPLICATION, AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE. APPLICATION FEE: PROPERTY OWNER(S) (PER DEED): MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: EMAIL: AGENT OR REPRESENTATIVE: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: EMAIL: ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY (if applicable): PARCEL NUMBER(S): LEGAL DESCRIPTION: $775 Rezoning Only $0 If submitted concurrently with corresponding Future Land Use Map Amendment (FLUM Amendment fee inclusive of rezoning) Rental Houses, LLC 300 S. Duncan Ave., Suite 275, Clearwater, FL 33755 727-461-7700 deet-tparentalhouses. corn Brian J. Aungst Jr., Esq. Macfarlane Ferguson & McMullen 625 Court Street Suite 200 Clearwater FL 33757 727-441-8966 bia0macfar_com 300 S. Duncan Ave., Clearwater, FL 33755 PID 14-29-15-00000-130-0200 (northern portion only) See attached for legal description. REASON FOR REQUESTED Rezone northern portion the property from Office to Commercial (southern AMENDMENT: portion is already Commercial). This rezoning request is concurrent with a request to change the Future Land Use designation of the same land area, from R/OG (Residential / Office General) to CG (CQmrriQrcial General). Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727.562-4567 Page 1 of 6 Revised 10/05116 Planning & Development Department Zoning Atlas Amendment Application PLEASE ENISURE THAT THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS FILLED OUT, IN ITS ENTIRETY. FAILURE TO COMPLETE THIS FORM WILL RESULT IN YOUR APPLICATION BEING FOUND INCOMPLETE AND POSSIBLY DEFERRED UNTIL THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION CYCLE. FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATION PRESENT: R/OG (Residential / Office_ Generali REQUESTED: OG (COmmerclal General) ZONING DISTRICT PRESENT: Q REQUESTED: C SITE AREA: Rezoning 122,459 sq. ft. Rezoninq 2.811 acres (Total site = 139,218 sq. ft.) (Total site = 3.196 acres) (MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE DENSfTY/iNiTENSITY(S) : USE(S): Current/Existing Existing (currently on site Future Land Use(s): 61,229 gsf or previous use if vacant): 70,855 gsf Office Proposed Future Land 67,352 gsf Proposed (new use, if any; Use(s) (if applicable): (80,822 gsf w/TDR) plus existing if to remain): Self storage with ancillary retail (units, rooms or beds per acre or non- residentiaisquare footage) ZONING DISTRWrS FOR ALL ADJACENT PROPERTY: North: RU Residential Urbane across street) South: CG igomrrigrcial General) East: CG (Commercial General, _. West: CG (Commercial General)and_R/OGtResidgntial,/ Office General) STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS 1, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described M this application. Sworn to and subscribed before me this day of by o is personally koe wn has produced _ ~ as identification. 4..re of prop owner or �aaer�/alive Notary pubi My commission expires: � ( My COMMISSION OFF14MMS Planning A Development Department. 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, F "K �► 7��¢ July 29. 2016 Page 2 of 5 007130-0153 FI AI�,� com Planning & Development Department Zoning Atlas Amendment Standards for Review PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO EACH OF THE SIX (6) STANDARDS FOR REVIEW EXPLAINING HOW, IN DETAIL, THE CRITERION IS BEING COMPLIED WITH PER THIS ZONING ATLAS AMENDMENT. 1. The proposed amendment is consistent with and furthers the goals, policies and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan and furthers the purposes of the Community Development Code and other City ordinances and actions designed to implement the Plan. See attached for response. 2. The available uses to which the property may be put are appropriate to the property which is subject to the proposed amendment and compatible with existing and planned uses in the area. See attached for response. 3. The amendment does not conflict with the needs and character of the neighborhood and city. See attached for response. 4. The amendment will not adversely or unreasonably affect the use of other property in the area. See attached for response. S. The amendment will not adversely burden public facilities, including the traffic -carrying capacities of streets, in an unreasonably or disproportionate manner. See attached for response. 6. The district boundaries are appropriately drawn with due regard to the locations and classifications of streets, ownership lines, existing improvements and the natural environment. See attached for response. Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567 Page 4 of 6 Revised 10/05/16 Planning & Development Department _ Zoning Atlas Amendment BBIGH7AMBEA=UL I SM10BEACH Affidavit to Authorize Agent/Representative 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed—PRINT full names: Rental Hnusp�, LLC By: Barrett Family Partnership I, LTD. iManager its Maner 2. That�(iarn are a owner s) and ec) ordrtitle holder(s) of the following described property: 300 S. Duncan Ave., Clearwater FL 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for (describe request): For the north portion of the property, change Future Land Use designation to Commercial General and Zoning_ to Commercial District (the southern portion already has these designations). 4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: Jonathan_ Dorman _StorCon Development, LLC as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; S. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described In this application; 7. That (I/we),,..>!ne undersigned at orlty, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. G� _Property Owner � ��,� Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS BEFORE ME THE UNDERSIGNED, AN OFFICER DULY COMMISSIONED BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, ON THIS _ _ DAY OF _� R< 2 tl) ? PERSONALLY APPEARW.- - f� ra'ti n i'7n� f'. jL� . _ •. WHO HAVING BEEN FIRST DULY SWORN I DEPOSED AND SAYS THAT HE/SHE FULLY UNDERSTANDS THE CONTENTS OF THE AFFIDAVIT THAT HE/SHE SIGNED. I sGo rV Public Signature My Commission Notary Seal/Stamp Expires: �'" CHERYL J CORNEUMS MlsSt0#*FFj4W46 Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, mw t my 29. 291$ Page 5 of B pp ey,r� tte71�-0t69 Fiorieril� Planning & Development Department Zoning Atlas Amendment BRIGHTMWBFrU1n M,11"TOSEACH Affidavit to Authorize _ Agent Representative 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed— PRINT full names: Rental Houses, LLC By: Barrett Family Partnership I, LTD, its Manager B miOne, L'� t eneral P9� r.f_ _ y 2. That (�am a are) the owne�{s�and recorMfe holders) of the following described property: 300 S. Duncan Ave., Clearwater Fl - 3. L3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for (describe request): For the north Portion of the pp?perty, chance Future Land Use designation to Commercial General and Zoning to Commercial District (the southern Portion already has these designations): 4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: Brian J. Aungst, Jr., Esq. Macfarlane Ferguson & McMullen as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; S. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. That (I/we) the undersiJgn d authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. r- j2- operty Owner Property Owner Property Owner Property owner i STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS BEFORE ME THE UNDERSIGNED, AN OFFICER DULY COMMISSIONED BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, ON THIS ._, �' DAY OF O Z O �? ;� PERSONkLIY.APPFARRD jr tln Y _ (' i r C� WHO HAVING BEEN FIRST DULY SWORN DEPOSED AND SAYS THAT HE/SHE FULLY UNDERSTANDS THE CONTENTS OF THE AFFIDAVIT THAT HE/SHE SIGNED. I N tar Pu.,Iic Signature My Commission ` Notary Seal/Stamp Expires: _ CNE ------ _. , ,_. R'YL. J_CO_RN U, �''•;'a;CilylMlSSION#FF1gsp45 Planning 6 Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clear or, Page 5 of 6 (aor) 398-0153 , �(�� BEC ON 14 TnWMHIP 20 EOL"" PMIGE 15 EAST � vllrttt,S cocariv ►14+?Iw !� �,, � 1^ /p 1 t 1" 1 I i 9.R 11 1 1 {,{ JJt i I IA 1 1 1 1 lel 1 1 1 1 ✓, !I" .}'�'1I1F11 1"i.si�t.'cllll�.� :.}Illi✓yl I �".eF'�x � '� :• '•.: `' _ +.� �yjd �, P'j, , A . - f � 1*..I A eI ..-rte: ; WAIN rIi �Iy 7 „ice' `� �� ----•3.1 ' l;i r P it .�...�� R • wt• a - T:sT—.iia ~ 1 � � :. �< �".eF'�x � '� :• '•.: `' _ +.� �yjd �, P'j, , A . - f � 1*..I A eI ..-rte: ; III: 2012004993 8K: 17454 PG: 347, 01/06/2012 at 01:29 PM, RECORDING 1 PAGES $10.00 D DOC STAMP COLLECTION $0.70 KEN BURL , CLERK OF COURT PINELLAS COUNTY, FL BY DEPUTY CLERK: CLKDMC4 QUffCLAIM DEED Retun► to: Enclosed self addressed stamped envelope Name: Y B Management, Inc. Address: 300 S. Duncan Ave. Suite 275 Clearwater, FL 33755 This insbtnnertt Prepared by: Erika L. Barratt Property Appraisers Pave Idar0ication }Folio) Number(s): 142g/1MMM 3WO200 L,egai Description: THIS QUITCLAIM DEED, Exeated this 23e0 day of December. 2Dt1, by fkst parry Erika L. Barratt as Trustee pf ft Enke L. Barrett Living Trust whose post office address Is 300 S. Duncan Ave., Suite 275, Cieatwater, FL 33755 to second party, Rental Houses, LLC whose past office address is 300 & Duman Ave., Sum 275, Cleantader. FL 33755. Legal Description: From SE Corner of SW V4 of NE'h tun W 393 fi(a) and N 50 Feet firm POB then W 60 feet then N 586.5 Fat, then E 396.14 Feet, then S 309.5 Feet, then i W 335.63 Feet, then S 280 Fast to POB continue 32.1 AC (C) 0woof as tecotded in Plat Boob 8935, Page 271 of the Public Rfootde of Pinelles County, Florida. Wf1NESSETH, That the said first party. for and in consideration of the sum of $10.00, In hand paid by the said second by � release and gAOalm unto ft said "mid party ftmeelt r, allr the ftK We, hereby, does remiss, and demand w61c9t Ota said frac party has In and to to Wov*V desotbed lW. pleos or parcel of land, *M ate, hAng and heft In the County vt PWM*. Stale of F=lorida, to wit To Have and W Hold, Bre same together WM s0 and aktgular ttw app ntenan m thataurnto belonoV or in snywfae oppwbdning. and all the estab, rVK tMe, interest, flan, equity and dein wheboever of Bte said W party. a Mier In low or equity, to the only proper use, benefit and befoove ofthe saki second party forever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The sold find party fres sighed and sealed Utase presents the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and ddN W In presove of Witness rNp,ZT L) ^al CtU r -, First Party C� 2l i., p at'\tiQ vr Witness t1 C1 a 110, C,ra `Second Party STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINELLAS I HEREBY CERTIFY that on tttis day, before me, an officer duly atuUxxind in Uro Stale aforesaid and in the County aforesaid to take its, persoody appeared Er9w L Barrett (personally known), beim duly sworn, and) b me known to be the person She person describe In and who executed On fcrepolng Instrument and who take an oath. WITNESS my hand and oftlel seal in the County and State bat aforesaid this 2r day of December., 2011. My Commission Expires: 3Q&2015 trM WAA 1t. SAND CIa�cb..,, Mr4ry Mer • fto a now NOfary PubNc VVft .opkaVert1.>latl Diann tswrMwsrs urrrrirrr,' SECTION 14 TOWNSHIP 28 SOUTH RANGE 15 EAST P,1JELL15 COUNTY i•LOPIDA ;Sf-' JY �� A — .J'�Q '� . „vltsbarsio "'� /�'°i •/ — ./ .s- __ _ _ _ � -exp*• R~ !,y J � R C i! __ 610;_ _ - - - - - - �e1. a 1 t .S rl i 11 I s'n "1ol . l ...� 10 Ir .V4 R J r� -s i t[i✓ 7 1 1 YW m' h.� I i 1 l I t i ....G�.'-; :.- t � I}•%r' 1 G f • I t. I f t i.d„ 1 1 k �A f i Yl I, l i �, t (l l� •I f i i't i I f I �f , I l� i f t f L1 I -I „tl'r ;�•.srrx�ssu�ll ... ...y..� �.: gym_... s _ �'"s' ............,m.,_ .• 5 -� �b ,.�.�«,.e.. �' • .:.fie --. �s-- ` �e ."'sts�., ��,....'..'"t-".�.�^•-.....- ....�.._._'^....C�«-rte. '�^"" `:._� -...� SKETCH & DESCRIPTION A parcel of land in the SW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 14, Township 29 South, Range 15 East, Pinellas County, Florida, further described as follows: Start at the SE corner of the SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 14, Township 29 South, Range 15 East, and go N 01 degrees 11'31" W, along the 40 acre line, 50.14 feet; thence go N 88 degrees 47' 06" W, 58.31 feet to the point of intersection of the West right-of-way line of Duncan Avenue and the North right-of-way line of Gulf to Bay Boulevard; thence N 00 degrees 33'28" W, along the West right-of-way line of Duncan Avenue, 280.00 feet to the Point of Beginning of this description; thence N 88 degrees 4706" W, 395.63 feet; thence N 00 degrees 39'25" W, 308.52 feet to a point on the South right-of-way line of Rainbow Drive; thence S 88 degrees 56'09" E, along the South right-of-way line of Rainbow Drive, 396.14 feet to a point of intersection with the West right-of-way line of Duncan Avenue; thence S 00 degrees 33'28" E, along the West right-of-way line -of Duncan Avenue 309.54 feet to the Point of Beginning. CONTAINING: 2.811 ACRES. MORE OR LESS. t . BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF GULF TO BAY BOULEVARD, HAVING A GRID BEARING OF NORTH 88'43'42" WEST. 2. THERE MAY BE ADDITIONAL EASEMENTS, RESTRICTIONS, AND/OR MATTERS NOT SHOWN ON THIS SURVEY WHICH MAY BE FOUND IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF THIS COUNTY. 3. THIS SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER. 4. THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY $ICBM. 5. BEARINGS AND DISTANCES ARE MEASURED AND RECORDED (R). SKETCH & LEGAL DESCRIPTION PROPOSED REZONING PARC'l l_ VDAS? LAND M11E% NC 111 FOREST LAKES BOULEVARD OLDSMAR. FLORIDA 34677 L.W4—M 69sNDARY-TOPOSM01EC•C4,dST KTIMSTtJWJT PH: (813) W-1342 MWMAMPABAURON SHEET 1 OF 2 I hereby 4w3liy that the 'SKETOCAND hereon was prepared under my:REW date(:) shown. and meats the- forlh_ bY !hs FLDrtIDA BOARD OP ttAPPEriS In =qpter 53-17, OLORIt►A.` pursuant to Seatlon 477.017, FLORIDA KELLY O.WOCLUNG PRaISSIMAL 9AZY YDR and MAPPER 00 asusTRA��YE -CODE rAl1f►ES:''- s ;r SKETCH & DESCRIPTION GV S88'56'09"E 396.14' (R) S88' 53'14"E 396.64' SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE ;n ap OF RAINBOW DRIVE C6 M ,-. W M3 M 3 U) 00 MN rnM PORTION TO BE REZONED N 0 0 r7 z z Lo In of CA M m POINT OF BEGINNING 395.63' N88'47'06"W (R) 395.82' N88' 46'54"W w z J >. 3 0 W Z NM O gip, d U =� OC z z z z C7 LL N88'47'06"W 1-- 0' z w o - A 58.31' (R) w ¢ o 0 N88' 47' 16"W m 00C*4 58.19' GULF -TO -BAY BOULEVARD N1 *11'31 "W (R) _ NO1' 07' 39"W 0 ;—` 40 acre line 50.14' POINT OF COMMENCEMENT (NOT FOUND) SE CORNER OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST SHEET 2 OF 2 SKETCH & LEGAL DESCRIPTION PROPOSED REZONING PARCEL PROJECT NO. 17064 DRAWING# 17064 SCALE 1'=100' �p� y�y± DRAWN of mAu Lm a KM DE 10/ 7 111 FOREST LIKES BOULEVARD CHECKED/QC KKM OLDSMAR, FLORIDA 34677 FIELD CREW NIA Q L.B 4W BOUNDARY-TOPOGRAPHIC-CONSTRUMM STAKEOUTBK. PG. WA Pit (813) W-1342 SURVEY DATE NIA REZ2017-10012 - Gulf to Bay Self Storage Responses to Rezoning Atlas Amendment Standards for Review The proposed amendment is consistent with and furthers the goals, policies and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan and furthers the purposes of the Community Development Code and other City ordinances and actions designed to implement the Plan in the following ways: The zoning atlas amendment furthers the goals, objectives, and policies of the Comprehensive Plan by providing a sufficient variety and amount of future land use categories and accommodating public demand and promoting infill redevelopment. See Goal A.2. The amendment will allow for the development of a self -storage facility subject of the contemporaneously filed FLD2017-09018. The project will be a commercial zoning and shall be located at the intersection of arterial or collector street (Gulf to Bay Blvd.) and will be sited in such a way as to minimize the intrusion of off-site impacts into residential neighborhoods. See Policy A.2.2.8. The project will provide for safe on- site traffic circulation and connections to adjacent arterial and collector streets consistent with Florida Department of Transportation, Institute of Traffic Engineers design guidelines, and other applicable roadway design standards, policies, and guidelines. See Policy A.2.2.11. The redevelopment will meet the safety, environmental, and aesthetic needs of the city pursuant to Goal A.3. The redevelopment will be supported by the available community and public facilities that are required to serve the development pursuant to Goal A.4. The redevelopment will support the character of the surrounding commercial properties consistent with Policies A.5.3 and A.5.4. The redevelopment will promote high quality design standards that support Clearwater's image and contribute to its identity consistent with Policy A.5.5. The redevelopment is innovative planned development that accomplishes infill development that is consistent and compatible with the surrounding environment pursuant to Policy A.6.2. 2. The available uses to which the property may be put are appropriate to the property which is subject to the proposed amendment and compatible with existing and planned uses in the area. The existing uses to the east, south, and west are all Commercial General. The uses to the north are LMDR. The subject site is currently a mixed use of Commercial General and Residential/Office General. The amendment will make the site's use consistent with the surrounding uses that front Gulf to Bay and abut Rainbow Drive. This site will be developed as a self -storage facility which is the subject of the contemporaneously filed FLD 2017-09018. 3. The amendment does not conflict with the needs and character of the neighborhood and city. The zoning is consistent with the commercial redevelopment pattern of Gulf to Bay Blvd. The project is design as to mitigate the impact on the residential street to the north and will not conflict with the needs or character of the surrounding properties. Page i of 2 4. The amendment will not adversely or unreasonably affect the use of other property in the area. Compared to the existing office on the property, the proposed use of self -storage facility will eliminate all traffic flow to Rainbow Drive and provide an enhanced buffer for the single- family residential lots to the north. The secured, enclosed design of the facility will also have a significant, positive impact on vagrancy on the property. 5. The amendment will not adversely burden public facilities, including the traffic -carrying capacities of streets, in an unreasonably or disproportionate manner. Compared to the existing office on the property, the proposed use of self -storage will generate less traffic and consume less water and sanitary capacity. 6. The district boundaries are appropriately drawn with due regard to the locations and classifications of streets, ownership lines, existing improvements and the natural environment. The rezoning is restricted to one parcel that is currently a mixed -zoned parcel. The amendment will make the zoning of the parcel consistent with the other adjacent parcels zoned commercial. The proposed self -storage development will have less impervious area than the existing office development. The stormwater management system also will be upgraded to meet current standards. There are no wetlands or other sensitive environmental features on the property. Page 2 of 2 LLC October 6, 2017 Ms. Lauren Matzke, AICP, Manager City of Clearwater Planning & Development 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 Re: LUP2017-10011 (Comprehensive Plan Amendment), and REZ2017-10012 (Zoning Atlas Amendment) Gulf to Bay Self Storage, 300 S. Duncan Avenue Dear Ms. Matzke: We are writing in response to your letter of Incompleteness for the subject application, dated October 4, 2017. A listing of your comments and our responses (in italics) is provided below: Comprehensive Plan Amendment 1. Legal Description: Confirm the legal description listed on Page 1 of the application is only for that portion of the parcel requested to be amended (application states 2.811 acres). Response: The application has been revised to reference the supplemental sketch and description of only the area to be amended. 2. Property Designations: Because only a portion of the site is proposed to be amended, "present" designations on Page 2 of the application should list only the designation on that portion or the parcel. The present and requested Countywide Plan Map category is not listed. 2.811 acres site area is 122,447 SF, which differs from what is listed on the application — confirm all calculations and acreage match. Current allowable density / intensity should not include the additional development potential from the requested TDR; please include GSF both with and without the proposed TDR under proposed. Response: The application has been revised to show the present designation of only the area to be amended, and the Countywide Plan Map designations have been added. 122,459 SF is the correct parcel area, which equals 2.811 acres when rounded to the nearest thousandth of an acre. The GSF figures have been revised as requested. 3. Response to review standard 1 regarding consistency with the City's Comprehensive Plan does not reference any goals, objectives or policies of the Plan. Response to review standard 3 does not address 8437 Tuttle Ave, #412, Sarasota, FL 34243 (813) 310-8520 (813) 436-5466 Fax ion.dormanCd)hotmail.com lisiq=op- Gulf to Bay Self Storage, October 6, 2017 the uses on South Duncan Avenue or Rainbow Drive, on which the proposed amendment area is located. Response: The application has been revised to incorporate the following: The comprehensive land use amendment furthers the goals, objectives, and policies of the Comprehensive Plan by providing a sufficient variety and amount of future land use categories and accommodating public demand and promoting infill redevelopment. See Goal A.2. The amendment will allow for the development of a self -storage facility subject of the contemporaneously filed FLD2017-09018. The project will be a commercial land use and shall be located at the intersection of arterial or collector street (Gulf to Bay Blvd.) and will be sited in such a way as to minimize the intrusion of off-site impacts into residential neighborhoods. See Policy A.2.2.8. The project will provide for safe on- site traffic circulation and connections to adjacent arterial and collector streets consistent with Florida Department of Transportation, Institute of Trak Engineers design guidelines, and other applicable roadway design standards, policies, and guidelines. See Policy A.2.2.11. The redevelopment will meet the safety, environmental, and aesthetic needs of the city pursuant to Goal A.3. The redevelopment will be supported by the available community and public facilities that are required to serve the development pursuant to Goal A.4. The redevelopment will support the character of the surrounding commercial properties consistent with Policies A.5.3 and A.5.4. The redevelopment will promote high quality design standards that support Clearwater's image and contribute to its identity consistent with Policy A.5.5. The redevelopment is innovative planned development that accomplishes infill development that is consistent and compatible with the surrounding environment pursuant to Policy A. 6.2. The existing uses to the east, south, and west are all Commercial General. The uses to the north are LMDR. The subject site is currently a mixed use of Commercial General and Residential/Office General. The amendment will make the site's use consistent with the surrounding uses that front Gulf to Bay and abut Rainbow Drive. 4. The survey provided is for the entire parcel, but does not delineate the portion of the parcel proposed to be amended or provide a legal description of said portion. A sketch and legal description to supplement the parcel survey should be provided. Response: The requested supplemental sketch and legal description are enclosed. 5. It is not necessary to provide a survey for the parcel associated with the TDR application as part of this application. Response: Noted. Page 2 of 5 f) 1, Gulf to Bay Self Storage, October 6, 2017 Lam. � Zoning Atlas Amendment 1. Legal Description: Confirm the legal description listed on Page 1 of the application is only for that portion of the parcel requested to be amended (application states 2.811 acres). Response: The application has been revised to reference the supplemental sketch and description of only the area to be amended. 2. Property Designations: Because only a portion of the site is proposed to be amended, "present" designations on Page 2 of the application should list only the designation on that portion. 2.811 acres site area is 122,447 SF, which differs from what is listed on the application — confirm all calculations and acreage match. Current allowable density / intensity should not include the additional development potential from the requested TDR; please include GSF both with and without the proposed TDR under proposed. Response: The application has been revised to show the present designation of only the area to be amended. 122, 459 SF is the correct parcel area, which equals 2.811 acres when rounded to the nearest thousandth of an acre. The GSF figures have been revised as requested. 3. The application did not include page 4 response to review standards; consider previous comments regarding the application for Comprehensive Plan Amendment where applicable, for the appropriate Zoning Atlas amendment criteria. Response: The application has been revised to incorporate the following: 1. The proposed amendment is consistent with and furthers the goals, policies and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan and furthers the purposes of the Community Development Code and other City ordinances and actions designed to implement the Plan in the following ways: The zoning atlas amendment furthers the goals, objectives, and policies of the Comprehensive Plan by providing a sufficient variety and amount of future land use categories and accommodating public demand and promoting infill redevelopment. See Goal A.2. The amendment will allow for the development of a self -storage facility subject of the contemporaneously filed FLD2017- 09018. The project will be a commercial zoning and shall be located at the intersection of arterial or collector street (Gulf to Bay Blvd.) and will be sited in such a way as to minimize the intrusion of off-site impacts into residential neighborhoods. See Policy A.2.2.8. The project will provide for safe on-site traffic circulation and connections to adjacent arterial and collector streets consistent with Florida Department of Transportation, Institute of Traffic Engineers design guidelines, and other applicable roadway design standards, policies, and guidelines. See Policy A.2.2.11. The redevelopment will meet the safety, environmeW61, and aesthetic needs of the city pursuant Page 3 of 5 IMLLEIFS, Gulf to Bay Self Storage, October 6, 2017 to Goal A.3. The redevelopment will be supported by the available community and public facilities that are required to serve the development pursuant to Goal A.4. The redevelopment will support the character of the surrounding commercial properties consistent with Policies A.5.3 and A.5.4. The redevelopment will promote high quality design standards that support Clearwater's image and contribute to its identity consistent with Policy A.5.5. The redevelopment is innovative planned development that accomplishes infill development that is consistent and compatible with the surrounding environment pursuant to Policy A.6.2. 2. The available uses to which the property may be put are appropriate to the property which is subject to the proposed amendment and compatible with existing and planned uses in the area. The existing uses to the east, south, and west are all Commercial General. The uses to the north are LMDR. The subject site is currently a mixed use of Commercial General and ResidentiallOffice General. The amendment will make the site's use consistent with the surrounding uses that front Gulf to Bay and abut Rainbow Drive. This site will be developed as a self -storage facility which is the subject of the contemporaneously filed FLD 2017-09018. 3. The amendment does not conflict with the needs and character of the neighborhood and city. The zoning is consistent with the commercial redevelopment pattern of Gulf to Bay Blvd. The project is design as to mitigate the impact on the residential street to the north and will not conflict with the needs or character of the surrounding properties. 4. The amendment will not adversely or unreasonably affect the use of other property in the area. Compared to the existing office on the property, the proposed use of self -storage facility will eliminate all traffic flow to Rainbow Drive and provide an enhanced buffer for the single-family residential lots to the north. The secured, enclosed design of the facility will also have a significant, positive impact on vagrancy on the property. 5. The amendment will not adversely burden public facilities, including the traffic -carrying capacities of streets, in an unreasonably or disproportionate manner. Compared to the existing office on the property, the proposed use of self -storage will generate less traffic and consume less water and sanitary capacity. 6. The district boundaries are appropriately drawn with due regard to the locations and classifications of streets, ownership lines, existing improvements and the natural environment. The rezoning is restricted to one parcel that is currently a mixed -zoned parcel. The amendment will make the zoning of the parcel consistent with the other adjacent parcels zoned commercial. The proposed self - storage development will have less impervious area than the existing office development. The Mrmweter management system also will Page 4 of 5 Gulf to Bay Self Storage, October 6, 2017 be upgraded to meet current standards. There are no wetlands or other sensitive environmental features on the property. 4. It is not necessary to provide a survey for the parcel associated with the TDR application as part of this application. Response: Noted. We trust the above responses and supplement information address your requirements to proceed with the review and approval of this application, but please feel free to contact me at ion.dormane-hotmail.com or 813-310- 8520 with any questions you may have. Sincerely yours, CA Jonathan Dorman, P.E. :jmd Enclosure: Sketch & Description, Revised Application Forms cc: Brian Aungst, Macfarlane Ferguson & McMullen Page 5 of 6 3 12/120:17 QEARWATER i - 300 s. duncan X 4, _ Show search resul`=_ for 300s. dunean Zoning and Future Land Use —mmm %A INCREMENT P, USG 200ft -82.767 27.96, Degrees hftp:f/cityotlearwater.maps.arcgi 3.ccro/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=1787a41 a5bc7484fa-£ 9f6f4a 13539ac 1i� 12/12'017 Zoning and Future Land Use QEARY✓ATER Zoring and Future Lane- 10 f11O� U f �I �tiLr IU UAY BLIJD wity of Clearwater tF�4!I FCsytsJ@n213i_.r'7�n 200ft 411 0 �r r 11 -82.76627.961 Degr=es 3L' S L W c Countyi of Phellas, Esri, HERE, Garmin, INCREMENT P, USG http:/f,ityaf:iearwater.raaps.arcgis. contepps/webappviewer/index.html?id=17E 7a41 a5bc7484fa4d9f6f4a 13539ac 1/1 .. i < E r: Wa b;6w;D,r Ram D�Nc)r _Raan�owjZ0 Q South j > DuncanAve l nue .s, „ i rA , umlb_- EI Tliorntonss- _ e t ance Au et Ban AC nter erica �r'. "� The Orange " , M ma i Pap NewYo-. .g ,• ner r w . A J c©n ro "ulEio Bay Blv Hob - - n P gulf toEBr, B lvc� - r, gulf v M . ,e n AutoZone est rine ' ° Xt , .: n - yin 16 Monkey Bar q E ell as County` M As Givers License.F �, It c ° t•zs ,, o i American Legion oogle.�� 12/12/2017 Zoning and Future Land Use CLEARWATER Zoning fi L 300 s. dunican X Q,j ter; �t- AI Show search results -or 300 s. d uncian H milli NOW M 11's - 1 9 =0 own" OEM Pop I 6.3mi -82.750 27.958 Decrees http://cftyofclearwater.maps.arcgis.comlappslwebappviewerlindex.html?id=1787a4la5bc7484fa499f6f4al 3539ac Ma In City cf Tampa, Esri, HERE, Garmin, INCREMENT P, USGD, M ^Iw ■rte _ _. 5 rrs—" m urup�s.�rl rrreMri 1 e n Fl, 0 0 Iii n il u 0 0 4 parIda k�eQ Cen��Opedic- it N X 4 �`•tYf ^r7 3•'`+�. c `'� .inn �, i. i � a ,cry E it _ �{ 8 .. rJr _ K i 1¢ _ ' N�� - • '� !!'� '4��u. ;cry �,. n°. � � " � W t ash �• " �- �t - � � ¢ �"'` ^�1 x � � � y� � .ra ` °- e9 `P i M1 /��,. � d,,;.> ...1: '' k4"'� .w x��" ., t�' , ,_'4 �.. _-.sY-''^�� 1 l;;y' i,'�,*v � .iif '• `� �.-''' �` `1 .,+i�y4� 4'j. 5 mow/' � - � _ � � � �~ x t :.:s � � _ � � � � .- T.' -fir y✓ � �. _ _ � Y` I a �1; 4\ f^ . t .j 41r In tV AL So >^?�}••TIWP^r `- .r s. ., .-�+� stir � y' 1 4#��- � R a. ,�Y r i IY T - _ •, • �: wn�.IPr1��.. 1 . �-�.��r . - � - �" I�La �l 3?l ti. u^ w - R re y �, '� i..M1r'Ali+� a.:x�. 5 a. ° j4 ■ °d e `-' � ,.,'' • ^w�Y � ,1. .+ -\. -,. - i w•" `i:--!'�+ �..+�i' 7 :ENL .. � -. ., i ',.�� .. ".Y F fa'wa...:. '".•w v,'�w-w�.,w t f �. ..., .y.+!t...t• P.ws� �':..\P.,�yy 4: �� '� _ .:. � ,� - n - . � ""^^twYtamr ' Y..--.oye t�--• � 'Sn ,.� ... ,{� '�'`y •d ivy"..�J1' ,,_ 1y';7+�� .wt{,.yac•'rw a _,- •Z,. :.+ �aw ..,yw` - l �. � _ ?�- 1 �•a. �--.•. ,yam � � sew t1+ 5F-� ....gw s �•ei" 7 �' i �{ .. f r ��*��r�� a� � t'4�. ; �, -'4,ci ONioIt4 T firxi I. - � f 0 I I it ;l r } r '.v K f Z z fir _ .r , - Y ,x' . . c .. y, IM Fm fl lip P. am 1t to ,�Y v k n 'C drt{ � �I` z fy, c •.yi' J., ;his -.. •w ' :✓T.:' F�., •,�y'� „�, ' - ..i7 : �� ' ,� � � r..a .' �, ` � \ •,4i ~_ x'y; aft".��" i� '+ .� • r � �.. iY a f wlr, AMOK • �-�n•' .r:11w .�5.�; s k _.. +,� tit t N a,<.r' °a �r 7�r�h Fri %+�N�+ "},uG � rr$ � '. � r�� : � JL•�"^ yr X11 f o 3 .,{rr u. k '•,i b�,j 'a �g, r,f �y ^0'� �� •� tr FTS t "" . m �G kWawa 1 _ L 0 .. I.,✓^ ,' \\� e,�{�`, �j 'jam - d • 3 A x - . _, �. �s ;jai;,, v r, � a vd'y''��.: i �� :. , 1 , �� a, � � ', ` �e 1 � �: .. ` ,¢' fir, 4':s` �. � `` ��_ �'` � _ r;,� .� ,� eE . �.. d' re�'� � �•� ry� , I1 0 B 0 u u GULF TO BAY SELF STORAGE �j fl STORMWATER I'E.f%lMtTLmR WALL i k i s � ! s i BUILDING A v i ✓ L_._., BLDG C y t d ' Via' =• " � sm K r. fT iift a < e ', dt lig n'�'� ixV �� +I��`i � •As�l �� r • ry • k GRAPHIC -.g:+. ::.. .y � �� F w s.... Hyl or tt 4 s t .5 k. 7.• n. F r' S Sp4� ^ 'i%1 b y e� e„+:.+ �t'i n4 ay w'++` ?j4 y y t `� �... { 's.^ h 7(a'�Z • a L d a ty say, £�Y�'i.�`C�?' y�i f ;=F 'Yat E^r� h'"� e v,.. i / 4 z' EU m' k i r �t;e uMsr ui _ a y, r GULF TO BAY SELF STORAGE CURRENT USE PROPOSED USE Office Self Storage Traffic ITE Code 710 ITE Code 151 Daily Traffic 11.01 trips/ksf 780 Trips 2.50 trips/ksf 191 Trips Peak Hour Trips 1.49 trips /ksf 106 Trips 0.26 trips/ksf 20 Trips Driveways onto Rainbow Ave 3 None Building Area Floor Area Gross 70,855 sf 76,490 sf Site Coveraae Building Coverage 34,065 sf 30,315 sf Pavement Area 74,532 sf 43,145 sf Sidewalk Area 2,520 sf 4,200 sf Open Space 16,260 sf 56,577 sf Parking Area Open Space 11,860 sf 5,000s Total 139,237 sf 139,237 sf Stormwater Management Stormwater Quality Treatment None Current Standards Stormwater Detention None Current Standards CHANGE -589 -75% -86 -81% -100% 5,635 sf -3,750 sf -31,387 sf -42% 1,680 sf 40,317 sf 46% -6,860s 0 sf 100% 100% �o i n n 0 ul 0 0 0 f I u J s Market Analysis of NW/Quadrant of Gulf to Bay Blvd and S. Duncan Ave. 300 S. Duncan Ave., Clearwater Subject is 3 -story 43 year old 70,000 sf ± "X" shaped tenant occupied office building. It is 50% ± leased. Land is 3.21 acres. Physical Characteristics: Vestige of an office from decades ago. Suffers from significant deferred maintenance and pneeded capital improvements (HVAC replacements, roof, window leaks, parking lot, walls and carpet, etc.). fl Locational Characteristics: Frontage on 3 roads- Gulf to Bay Blvd, S. Duncan and Rainbow Dr. Gulf to Bay is predominantly retail with significant amounts of automotive use. Recent/new developments are predominantly commercial retail in nature. Lack of recent/new developments of office. Indication of lack of demand for office space in immediate area. Financial Characteristics: Subject rents for $9-10 per sf gross mostly month-to-month. Asking rents of subject smallest spaces is $12 per sf gross and $9 per sf for larger spaces. Would take $9 per sf for any. Market rents range from $8-15 per sf gross, indicating maximum net market rent below $10 per sf and near $8 per sf. Feasibility Tests: ITEM ACTUAL AT MARKET AT ASSESSED VALUE OF $2,150,000 Rent per SF $9.00 $10.00 $12.79 Potential Gross Income $630,000 $700,000 $895,000 Vacancy & Collection 50% 10% 10% Effective Gross Income $31.5,000 $630,000 $805,000 Operating Expenses per SF $560,000 $560,000 $560,000 Net Operating Income Indication If Cap Rate 7% $245,000 -0- $70,000 $1,000,000 $245,000 $3,500,000 Less Minimum Needed Deferred Maintenance and Capital Improvements ($1,000,000) ($1,000,000) ($1,000,000) NET INDICATOR ($1,245,000) -0- $2,500,000 Cva clnsaon: The subject office building has reached the end of its Economic Life and the site should be re- zoned to allow for an alternative Commercial use. FRONT VIEW OF SUBJECT LOOKING WEST REAR VIEW OF SUBJECT LOOKING SOUTH FROM RAINBOW DRIVE INTERIOR VIEW INTERIOR VIEW OF VACANT SPACE 0 n n Il ul hl !J COMMERCIAL USE TO THE IMMEDIATE EAST ACROSS DUNCAN AVE. COMMERCIAL USE (HVAC REPAIR BUSINESS) ON RAINBOW DR TO EAST ONE BLOCK EAST increment in the Community Redevelopment Area. This estimate will assist the City in planning and budgeting for capital improvements and other expenditures of the Community Redevelopment Agency. RELATIONSHIP OF DOWNTOWN PLAN TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE In addition to the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan, the Downtown Plan is the official statement of policy regarding the Downtown and in particular with regard to the use of land and public policies. All development of land, both public and private, undertaken within the Downtown shall be consistent with and further the goals of the Plan. All new or amended development regulations for Downtown shall be consistent with and further the goals of this Plan. The Plan establishes categories of permitted uses and prohibited uses; based on this Plan, the Community Development Code will enumerate the specific types of permitted and prohibited uses and their related development standards consistent with this Plan. The Plan establishes development potential and height for each character district that will govern all redevelopment activity. The tools identified in this Plan to consider additional development potential (Transfer of Development Rights and the Public Amenities Incentive Pool) may be used to increase the development potential in excess of that specified in the Character District upon a determination that the increase is consistent with and furthers the goals of this Plan. The Public Amenities Incentive Pool is the only tool identified to consider building height in excess of that set by the character districts. Other than those two tools specified above, the Plan's statements regarding development potential, allowable and prohibited uses and, maximum height shall not be varied except through an amendment to this Plan. Although the maximum height established by the Plan cannot be varied, except as described above, the process to reach maximum permitted heights within the allowable range is governed by the Community Development Code. Any development regulation not specifically addressed in the Plan objectives, policies, character districts and design guidelines shall be governed by the Community Development Code. However, should there be any discrepancy between this Plan and the Community Development Code, the goals and policies of this Plan shall govern. PUBLIC AMENITIES INCENTIVE POOL Purpose To overcome the numerous constraints affecting redevelopment, the Downtown Plan establishes the Public Amenities Incentive Pool to provide an opportunity for the private sector to gain additional development potential while assisting the public to achieve its redevelopment goals for Downtown Clearwater. 214 Eligible Amenities All property within the Downtown Plan boundaries will be eligible to use the Public Amenities Incentive Pool. Allocations from the Pool will be available to projects that provide one or more improvements and/or fees in -lieu of certain improvements that provide a direct benefit to Downtown revitalization. There shall be a correlation between the amount of the bonus and the incentive provided and the actual bonus amounts shall be set forth in the Community Development Code. The allocation of increased density or intensity through the Pool shall be at the discretion of the City as determined through the Community Development Code site plan review process. The types of amenities eligible for density/intensity bonuses may include, but are not limited to: • Residential uses in the Downtown Plan area; • Ground floor retail in the Downtown Core Character District; • Uses in particular locations and/or mixed use projects that further the Plan's major redevelopment goals and character district vision; • Day care facility; • Portion of project reserved for Affordable Housing; • Significant Public Space on site; • Public Art on site; • Preservation of a historic building to the Secretary of Interior's Standards; • Construction of public parking on site; • Cultural or Performing Arts Facility on site; • Contributions to Master Streetscape and Wayfinding Plan; • Contributions to Coachman Park or Station Square Master Plan; • Contributions to Pinellas Trail or connector trails; • Contributions to public parking facility; or • As determined by the City Commission. Amount of Development Potential in Pool The amount of floor area and dwelling units available in the Pool is created by the difference between the development potential allowed by the sum total of the potential prescribed by the 1995 Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, Downtown Clearwater Periphery Plan Update, and the underlying land use categories of areas not governed by one of these Plans as compared to the development potential permitted in this Plan. The methodology used to determine the amount of the Pool is contained in the Appendix 7. The amount of density/intensity available in the Pool is as follows: • 2,326 dwelling units and • 2,119,667 square feet of floor area for non-residential uses. In the event that either the total number of dwelling units or non-residential square feet available in the Pool is substantially or completely allocated, the City shall determine whether or not to allow a conversion of all or part of the remaining potential between dwelling units and non-residential floor area. In its sole discretion, the City shall establish the conversion methodology. 215 When all of the development potential in the Pool has been allocated, the Pool will cease to exist. Upon the Pool's termination, the only tool to increase density and intensity that will remain available is the use of Transfer of Development Rights. If the Pool is completely allocated during the valid term of this Plan, the City may elect to study alternatives to replenish the Pool. The alternatives studied may include, but are not limited to, a reduction in all or parts of this Downtown Plan area to create development potential or an evaluation of available facility capacity which would facilitate increased development potential in all or parts of the Downtown Plan area. It is recognized that replenishing the Incentives Pool may require the review of the Pinellas Planning Council and the Board of County Commissioners in their capacity as the Countywide Planning Authority. Pool Allocation Process The allocation of additional density/intensity shall be made in conjunction with a site plan application reviewed by the Community Development Board (CDB) through a process defined in the Community Development Code. The CDB will be responsible for ensuring that all projects utilizing the Pool meet the goals, objectives and policies of the Plan and is in keeping with the vision established for the character district in which the project is located. The CDB may consider granting an increase in the maximum building height specified in a character district if the developer of a site plan application provides a major public amenity as defined in the Community Development Code, and the increase in height does not exceed 20% of the maximum permitted height or a minimum of ten feet. Development potential obtained through the Pool shall not be transferred to any other site under any circumstance. DOWNTOWN STRATEGIES Strategy 1: Prepare a study evaluating effective incentives to encourage residential and commercial uses Downtown. Strategy 2: Prepare a zoning study to evaluate the appropriate zoning district boundaries for the following areas: • Areas with inconsistent zoning and land use plan designation. • East Gateway District -evaluate expansion of the Commercial district in certain locations along Gulf to Bay Boulevard to facilitate consolidated redevelopment sites. • Evaluate Downtown (zoning) and Central Business District (land use) (D/CDB) area along both sides of Cleveland Street from Missouri Avenue to the existing eastern border at (approximately) Fredrica Avenue. The purpose of the evaluation is to determine whether D/CBD is appropriate at that location or if the more appropriate zoning is Commercial District and varied residential districts. 216 Strategy 31: Assist the residents of the East Gateway residential areas in the formation of one or more neighborhood crime watch associations. Strategy 32: Provide a more visible community policing presence within the East Gateway neighborhood. Strategy 33: Continue to support the Police Department's Hispanic Outreach Program and Apoyo Center. The Apoyo Center addresses many of the service needs of the neighborhood through partnering with other organizations and businesses. Programs of the Apoyo Center include interpretation services, recruitment of bilingual officers, a victim advocacy outreach program, a domestic violence program, crime prevention and drug and alcohol education. Strategy 34: Continue to support the YWCA/City of Clearwater Hispanic Outreach Center and emphasize continuing and enhanced partnerships with social service agencies to assist East Gateway residents. Programs include childcare, diplomatic intervention, adult education, English classes, GED instruction, computer and job training and other related services as the need arises. Strategy 35: Research implementing a low-interest loan program to assist businesses with a variety of activities including the acquisition of buildings and/or properties and the rehabilitation or new construction of new office or commercial space. Strategy 36: Work with the Clearwater Regional Chamber of Commerce to target small business needs. Strategy 37: Establish partnerships with local banks to facilitate conventional loans to businesses in the area. 220 Incentive: Enterprise Zone (EZ) Program Goal/Brief Description: Newly expanded or redeveloped businesses located in the Enterprise Zone (Map 15, page 173), who collect or pay Florida sales and use tax and Florida Corporate Income Tax, may be eligible for tax incentives for promoting private sector investments and providing job opportunities for Enterprise Zone residents. The following are incentives available for businesses: Property tax credit (corporate income tax); jobs tax credit (corporate income tax); jobs tax credit (sales and use tax); sales tax refund for building materials used in rehabilitation of real property; sales tax refund for business machinery and equipment. Eli ibili : The zone encompasses the current and expanded Community Redevelopment Area; it has the same boundaries as the Brownfields program. Funding Source: Department of Revenue. Award Ranges: Varies according to incentive. Sample Proiects: Harbor Oaks, LLC; Walgreens; Publix. Contact: Economic Development & Housing Department - (727) 562-4054. Incentive: Regional Activity Center (RAC) Program Goal/Brief Description: The RAC designation increases the thresholds for hotel. and office uses that would trigger Development of Regional Impact review. Eli ib ility: The RAC encompasses the boundaries of the Central Business District plan category as indicated in the Downtown Redevelopment Plan 1995. FundingSource: ource: Not applicable. Award Ranges: Hotel threshold increases from 350 rooms to 750 rooms; office threshold increases from 300,000 square feet of floor area to 600,000 square feet. Sample Projects: None. Contact: Planning Department - (727) 562-4579. Incentive: Exemption of Open Space, Recreation Land and Recreation Facility Impact Fees Program Goal/Brief Description: Redevelopment or the expansion of currently developed properties located within the Community Redevelopment Area are exempt 243 AmSouth Block between Osceola Avenue, Fort Harrison Avenue, Cleveland Street and Drew Street or "Superblock" Parcel - Contains one large parcel, along with a few smaller properties. In total, the greater parcel could ultimately contain approximately 178,000 square feet or 4.1 acres. Development potential at this site could be over 712,000 square feet or 287 units. Harborview Parcel at Cleveland Street and Osceola Avenue - This City -owned 77,000 square foot or 1.8 -acre parcel, currently houses a 54,000 square foot Stein Mart Department Store, the City's civic and conference center space, the Pickles Plus Restaurant along with an adjoining small parking lot. It is envisioned that some time in the future, Stein Mart would be relocated to another Downtown site, and the structure demolished for redevelopment as a major mixed-use development with a combination of retail, entertainment, hotel, and conference destination space. The Commission has interest in redeveloping the parcel if a quality developer can be identified who would meet the stringent requirements for redevelopment on this critical parcel. Sale of the Harborview site will require approval of a referendum by Clearwater voters. Station Square Parking Lot Infill Parcel on Cleveland Street - Currently used as a City surface parking lot, this prime redevelopment parcel is owned by the CRA and has been offered to the public for redevelopment. The parcel contains 42,124 square feet or 0.97 acres, and is envisioned as a site for a garage structure (including public parking), retail, restaurant, and residential units. Development potential at this site could be over 168,000 square feet or 67 units. • Prospect Lake Park Area between Myrtle and Missouri Avenues - This Downtown area -surrounds the new urban Prospect Lake Park that has recently been completed by the City. The initial private redevelopment project in the area under construction is the 100 -unit Mediterranean Village in the Park townhouse project. This area has been identified by developers as a prime location for future infill townhouse and apartment projects due to its proximity to the beaches, regional employment centers, and the fact that a housing product can still be developed at a $150,000 to $300,000 price range, which accommodates the needs of many young professionals, young families and empty nesters. It is also envisioned that the adjacent Town Lake Business Park District might attract additional professional office users to expand the campus office setting now in place at the CGI office complex. East Gateway - Between Missouri and Highland Avenues and lying within the recently expanded CRA district are multiple infill parcels that over time will become attractive for redevelopment. 254 Tax Increment Revenue Projections Based on this overview,, it is evident that the CRA has the potential for developing several million square feet of development over the next two decades, including the attraction of up to 1,000 new urban housing units in the next five to ten years in the downtown core which will act as a catalyst for a substantial amount of new office use, retail and entertainment establishments. If all of these projects described above are realized, the increase in the tax roll could be upwards of $390 million. However, while opportunities are outstanding, it is the intent of the CRA to proceed forward cautiously with our TIF projections. The TIF projections are calculated separately for the original CRA and the expanded CRA because the base years for the property values are different. The CRA envisions continuing to use both the City's and the County's share of Tax Increment Financing dollars for capital projects in the original and expanded CRA. TIF is identified as one of the funding sources for several capital and infrastructure improvement projects outlined in the Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) section of this plan. These projects include the Cleveland Street, Fort Harrison, and Gulf to Bay Streetscapes and the Gulf to Bay Boulevard and Highland Avenue Gateway Intersection. In addition, TIF will be used for paying impact fees, "buying in" of public parking in private projects, assembling redevelopment sites, purchasing land and/or buildings, affordable and transitional housing projects, and fagade improvement grants. Below is a summary of the programs and initiatives that will use TIF as well as the estimated costs associated with each. The County's share of TIF shall only be used for the capital projects included in the table below. The City's share of TIF may be used for any initiative listed in the table. Programs and Initiatives Timing Estimated Cost Area Brownfields Environmental Cleanup * Ongoing $5,000,000 Building Fagade Improvement Program* Ongoing $1,000,000 itown Land Acquisition * Ongoing $21,000,000 Redevelopment Incentive Funding Ongoing $10,000,000 I Lease/Location Incentives Ongoing $5,000,000 Affordable and Transitional Housing Projects* Ongoing $5,000,000 Revolving Loan Fund Ongoing $1,000,000 *Capital projects and initiatives - County TIF shall only be used for these programs 255 CRA Area Brownfields Environmental Cleanup Proiects Due to the limited availability of state and federal environmental cleanup funds, TIF dollars will be required for environmental remediation for multiple projects, particularly those that have a history of petroleum contamination. A case in point is the Clearwater Auto Salvage Yard that is being acquired by the City, as well as a number of sites lying adjacent to the CGI (formerly IMRglobal) Campus west of Missouri. Project Cost: $5.0 million Time Frame: Ongoing CRA Building Facade Improvement Program This is an ongoing program funded by the CRA in concert with our Main Street Program. The Fagade Improvement Program provides grants and loans to eligible business property owners and tenants who wish to upgrade their exterior building facades. Project Cost: $1.0 million Time Frame: Ongoing Downtown Land Acquisition A critical function of the CRA is to assemble property for resale and redevelopment by the private sector. The principal purpose of property assembly is to assist in eliminating the slum and blight conditions that exist within the CRA by facilitating private redevelopment of these under -performing sites. This program enables the CRA to assemble, purchase and option property and structures within the CRA for redevelopment purposes consistent with this Plan. Examples of property acquisitions anticipated by this program include but are not limited to: acquiring property in the Town Lake Business Park Character District to facilitate the development of a suburban office campus; acquiring property in the East Gateway Character District to eliminate the problematic uses and/or contaminated sites, to improve the substandard housing conditions and to consolidate obsolescent and/or sites undersized as compared to current zoning requirements to allow commercial redevelopment; acquiring property within the Downtown to assist in the development of a major entertainment attraction including a movie theater, entertainment, retail and/or restaurant uses. Other property acquisitions that implement the goals, objectives and policies of this Plan may be achieved through the use of this CRA program. Total Cost: $21.0 million Time Frame: Ongoing 256 L 18 US 19 CLEARWATER -a ',(,, ,Prep iatlt'F P0,, Figure 12. REIS Norte Pinellas Submarket AMM Tarpon Springs ,! Swims Palm Harbor rirs�r.5, Dunedin Clearwater oosnore Town'o" T �� ' ;Cowatry satiny South HR94�o m t e..L. LOCAL COMPETITIVE MARKET The Nicrth Pinellas Submarket (see Figure 12) is projected to hold a stable, slightly increased share of the metro area's occupied retail stock (about 22 percen: of the total metropolitan area) and a decreasing share cf the vacant stock. By 2015 the occupied community and neightorhood retail stock in 1.e North Pinellas Submarket is expected to sur:,,ass eight nillion square feet. The retail market has long been the primary economic engine in the US 19 corridor, and the number of retail Businesses compared tc `he County, and employees compared US 19 Revevelopment Plan - Market Context to the number of households, epitomizes this fact. For example, the US 19 corridor makes up only four percent of the County's households, but makes up 12 percent of the clothing stores in the County. The corridor contains several regional malls and a plethora of community and neighborhood retail, all of which amounts to over 4.6 million square feet of retail space. Most of this stock was built in the 1970s and 1980s, and developments in the corridor have vacancies ranging from zero percent to almost 90 percent, with an overall average vacancy of 11 percent. The construction on the US 19 corridor has already caused some of the retail tenants to move and consolidate around major hubs like the Westfield Countryside Mall and the Clearwater Mall, but retail is still scattered along the corridor. DEMAND ANALYSIS To assess the demand opportunity for new retail in the County and the corridor, BEBR medium-high projections for Pinellas County released February 2012 were utilized. The square feet of retail supported by each household based upon a comparison of total retail square feet in the Tampa MSA from CB Richard Ellis was then compared to total Tampa MSA households from Moody's Economy.com. Esri data regarding the number of retail businesses in the study area versus the number of retail businesses in the County was utilized to determine the capture in the corridor. In addition, RCLCO determined an upside potential based upon the corridor capturing a higher amount of retail demand based upon offering new product and redevelopment. Based upon this analysis, there is the potential for between 120,000 and 220,000 square feet of new retail space in the corridor by 2030. This does not take into account any specific project for which the numbers could be higher or lower based upon a site-specific market study. The demand for the corridor is based upon the corridor's overall potential. Office Market The US office sector has achieved a modest rebound since the worst of the recession in 2009. The global economy is improving, with job — - ------ - — US 19 CLEARWATER 19 nrrino 1nnn:vrtr-f.rc Plocr- growth in select domestic markets leading to vacancy reductions and effecti ,,r-:? rent growth, albeit at a slow pace. Office demand should contin 1e to be driven by traditional factors such as global economic growth and employment growth in key office -using industries. However, recent office market performance has been largely uneven, with certain "pockets of excellence" in markets experiencing strong growth in the technology and energy sectors, compared to underperforming markets plaguEd by pre -recession overbuilding and weak employment growth. AlthoLAh the office outlook for 2012 and beyond remains cautiously optimistic, the trend toward less office space per employee represents a major t.ireat to current office owners and developers throughout the country. Growth in elderly populations and continued employment growth in the healthcare sector should drive medical office demand over the long-te-m. Domestic markets experiencing growth in aging populations should See increased demand for revamped medical office space to accomodate both the growing population as well as new technologies and se -rices. This could have major implications for various markets in Hod& and Tampa Bay, including Pinellas County. Given -iese macroeconomic and demographic trends, the most attractive national office opportunities will be focused on Class A properuies in central business districts, along with well -located medical office properties. Significant development of new spacE, appears to be far off (into the next real estate up -cycle, most likely) as domestic marke-s continue to work through existing inventories. While the worst o" the office market's recent troubles appear to have passed, improvement will continue at a slow, methodical pace as growing business confidence leads to steady absorption of global office space. Similar `o retail, the Tampa MSA office market has suffered during the downturn, but like the rest of the country, has seen a modest rebound in office space demand due to a confidence in the economy. In 2011, there was 561,000 square feet of positive net absorption while at the same time there were no new supply additions, allowing vacancy to drop to 20.6 percent by the end of 2011. In addition, there has been positive rent growth. According to REIS,"the robust performance seen in 2011, due mainly to the strong opening quarter, will be followed by a slower period ahead. Construction remains subdued" LOCAL COMPETITIVE MARKET Despite improving office market indicators in the Tampa MSA overall, the immediate space around the corridor has a long road to recovery. In 2010 and 2011, office vacancy hovered at 30 percent in the North Pinellas Submarket, and, while it is projected to decrease significantly over the next five years, it will still likely remain upwards of 20 percent because there is a substantial amount of vacant space in the submarket that must be absorbed. In the 1990s and early 2000s, the North Pinellas Submarket had a similar vacancy rate to the Tampa MSA, between 10 percent and 15 percent, but now it is almost 10 percent higher than the MSA (at 30 percent as stated earlier, versus 20 percent in the Tampa MSA according to REIS). Pinellas County has seen a steadily decreasing rental rate for office space (currently at $17.00 per square foot), whereas the rental rate in the larger North Pinellas Submarket has stayed relatively steady (currently at just under $18.00 per square foot). After the County rate peaked in the third quarter of 2007 at just over $20.00, its average rental rate has now fallen to under $17.00, which is lower than the Tampa MSA or the Submarket sub -area, but its vacancy rate, at about 14 percent, is also lower than either the Tampa MSA or the sub -area. This suggests that brokers/owners in the County have responded to the lack of leasing activity by dropping rental rates, and could explain why many tenants in the US 19 corridor have decided to locate out of the immediate area if they can find a "better deal" in a comparable location. Most of the office space in the corridor was built in the 1980s and 1990s and much of it is outdated and does not meet the current needs of tenants. While there is a total of 1.5 million square feet of office space in the corridor, it is parsed into small, scattered developments, most with buildings under 50,000 square feet. US 19 Redeyelejpm ntt Mar, - Market contteztt .z,, , CLEARVVATER DEMANpANALYSIS To asse.:s the demand opportunity for new office in the County and the corriclo-, Florida Department of Economic Opportunity's Labor Market Inform.2tion for Pinellas County employment projections were utilized to determ ne annual employment change in the County. To determine the amoun- of office demanded for each new job, several data points were compEwd.The total office square feet in the Tampa MSA from CB Richard Ellis wa; compared to totFI Tampa MSA employment from Moody's Econo-my.com, which yielded 42 square feet of office per employee. Second office absorption from REIS versus employment growth from Moody:; Economy.com from 1990 to 2010 was analyzed, which yielded 33 squiEre feet of office pe- employee. Then, the capture in the corridor was determined using the average of the two methods, or 37 square feet of new office demanced per new employee, as well as Esri data regarding the number of employees in the study area versus the number of employees in the Coun-y. In addition, an upside potential based upon tl-e corridor capturing a higher number of employees based upon offerin_ new product and redevelopment was determined. Based upon this anAysis, there are a potential 13,000 to 30,000 new square feet of office p=r year in the corridor for a potential total of 300,000 to 435,000 square-eet within the corridor by 2030. This does not take into account any spe::ific project for wNch the numbers could be higher or lower based) upon a site-specific market study. The demand for the corridor is based -pon the corridor's overall potential. For -Rent Residential Market Although the recent recession had a significant negative impact on all asset twDes, the national apartment sector has experienced a robust recove-v, supported by broad economic and demographic trends that suggest significant pent up demand for rental housing. The major drivers for the recovery are robust job recovery in some markets that generates new household growth and release of pent-up demand, a demographic wave ofyoung household; in prime renter age groups entering the market and continued declines in homeownership due to foreclosures NS 19 Recevelopment Plan - Mar�ea Qontteut and other distress that may potentially change preferences. Although these trends may be cyclical in nature, the near-term growth in demand for rental housing appears to be the most certain trend in real estate. A less positive, alternative medium-term economic scenario is possible for apartments if job growth fails to accelerate, or even cools off. Rent and Net Operating Income (NOI) growth projected by many investors may fail to materialize, or may slow, despite recent strong performance. The apartment market may face further challenges as developers bring meaningful supply additions to the market in various regions. The Tampa MSA apartment market has been in recovery similar to the US. Based upon an increase in demand, development and investor activity has been strong. In 2011, almost 2,800 units were absorbed, with no new market -rate apartments being delivered, helping to decrease vacancy. REIS reports that year end 2011 vacancy was only 6.1 percent. Construction is beginning again with almost 1,500 apartment units expected to be delivered in Tampa MSA in 2012 and 2,250 new units projected or 2013. Rents have been increasing and the average asking monthly rent was $848 per month at year end 2011. According to REIS, "While construction is on the rise, it is not expected to lose touch with demand; timely absorption of the new units is expected as the market enters a new period of supply -demand balance. Year-end vacancy rates in the neighborhood of 5.5 percent are expected for the foreseeable term. Rent growth rates are projected at 3.1 percent asking and 4.7 percent effective in 2012. Other favorable increases should follow.' LOCAL COMPETITIVE MARKET The North Pinellas Submarket is performing similarly to the market overall. As of year end 2011, vacancy was at 4.6 percent with an average asking rent of $888. Thirty-one different rental properties close to and within the corridor study area were considered. Of this set, the average rent was $1.03 per square foot for apartments within the corridor study area and $0.95 per square foot outside of the study area. Both of the areas had low vacancies at 5.4 percent. The highest rents in the CLEAR IM MER Likely, projects would be mixed horizontally (e.g., on the same site, but no- stacked over each other) rather than vertically (e.g., residential over retail). The right site would be necessary to create this type of devela:ment, but there is market demand for it. Table 6 outlines the retail strengths and weakresses in the corridor. Office The m2iket for office in the corridor, as with many places in the US, is currenti,r weak, except for opportunistic projects. Office vacancies are very high. and the space it the corridor is typically outdated. In fact, there its _urrently over one million square feet of vacant office space in the No -`h Pinellas Submarcet. All office buildings in the corridor are under - 50,000 square feet with an average size of 50,000 square feet. In add'i_-on, the corridor is oerceived as a retail location, and therefore it may be -Larder to attract office tenants to the area. While t --ere is quite a signi=icant amount of vacant space in the market not all of -the space is competitive in the current market. There is potential for redevelopment and the opportunity to create new bcidings, if the new sapace better meets tenant preferences. The strongest first opportunity is to focus on the types of businesses that are currently located in the co-ridor (e.g., services, finance, insurance, real estate, -ealth care), and bLild upon those. There is also 2n opportunity to create a mixed-use environment with the correct projec-. Table 7 lists the office s_-engths and challe-iges in the corridor. For -Reit Residential The demand in the area is strong for rental product.Thete are low vacancies, and apartment developers throughout Florida and the nation are look ng for locations to construct new apartments. Tie highest rents in the area average $1.32 per square foot for product on the water, high enougF to justify new construction. Overall rents average over $1.00 per squere foot, still very strong. In addition, all of the apartments in the �9S t9 Re©pmeatt Nan Markel ConBastt4 corridor were constructed prior to 2001, creating an opportunity for new product. As with the other land uses, the correct site needs to be located for the development of rental apartments. They would likely be walk-up, garden -style apartments, but there may be the opportunity to develop higher -density product, such as apartments that wrap around internal structured parking (the"Texas donut"), on a parcel that has both site and situational advantages from the perspective of an apartment developer. In addition, apartments would be a good use in a mixed- use project. They would likely be integrated into the project with good walking connections, but without a vertical integration of land uses. The strengths and challenges of rental apartments are laid out in more detail in Table 8. For -Sale Residential The short-term economic conditions for both attached and detached for -sale residential have depressed demand, but long-term demand fundamentals are strong within the corridor. The area has a lot of housing, and is well -located relative to services and employment cores. In order to sell residential within the corridor, it would likely be targeted to primary home buyers and be a value alternative to newer, more expensive product in Clearwater Beach or in downtown Tampa (the majority of attached product in study area sold for under $100,000 in 2011). The target audience for a project within the corridor would likely be a mixture of empty nesters and retirees as well as professionals working in the area. The specific product for for -sale residential would depend upon the identified site, but would likely include some type of attached product such as townhomes, plex products, and condominiums. The strengths and challenges associated with for -sale residential are listed in Table 9. ----------- --US 19CLEARWATER 2_ rreat+nq lnnovr `Fable 6. Retail Strengths & Chal lenges STRENGTHS High traffic counts in the corridor— certair points have between 75,000 to 100,000 traffic counts daily Large population base—over 100,000 households within a five -mile radius from L -S 19 and SR 580 Existing reputation as a strong retail corridor Vacated spots available to fill and the chance to consolidate retail into hubs Table 7. Me Strengths & Challengers STRENGTHS Increa!ing employment across key incustries and good regional access to potential employees and businesses Despit-2 decreasing rents and I °ncreasing vacancies post -2007, both stabilized in 2010-2011 and are projected to improve through 2016 High lErel of services and retail space helps increase office desirability, j although hard to access Great proximity and connectivity to existing office cores Table 8. For -Rent Residential Strengths & Challenges CHALLENGES STRENGHS t`iAtClrEfGS Visibility—lack of signage for retailers given new limited-a:cess road Uncertainty associased with US 19 construction and trEnsition to limited - access Lack of connection of retail to surrounding neighborhoods Oversupply of the market—with a strong retail base, risk of oversupply increases and new retailers need to be strategic Outdated centers w th high vacancy drag down rents CHALLENGES Vacancy rates have a long way to go—average office vacancy is almost 30% in the corridor Land prices and ach;evable rents in submarket make delivery of office space difficult Parking requirements of tenants versus available space—tenants often desire more spaces than available with the older buildings Competing with new office cores in greenfield locations Great access to employment cores Well executed projects achieve a 30+ percent premium over the average in the area Despite some existing product vacancy, the corridor has a high number of renters due to its superior access and could capture turnover from inside the corridor and elsewhere in the MSA Draw from both workforce population and 55+ population depending on product type positioning Most of the study area is not achieving a high dollar/sf Finding a piece of land large enough to allow a developer to create a good size project (250+/- units) Table 9. For -Sale Residential Strengths & Challenges STRENGTHS An increasing 55+ population in the Tampa MSA and the county and strong in -migration patterns Little new condo/townhome inventory in the study area or surrounding area Conversions of prime for -rent space possible once the area experiences greater recovery CHALLENGES The market collapse brought prices significantly down and recovery is coming to this area slowly Currently competing with areas that are higher -end or have less construction Numerous mobile home parks and older retail creates a perception of lower quality US 19 Redevelopment plan - Market Context CLEARWATER For unincorporated porticns of the study area located rorth of SR 580/ Main Street, land develop-nent and zoning are controlled by the Pinellas County Land Developmene Code. The primary County zoning district for parcel -directly on US 19 i3 Commercial Parkway (CP -1 or CP -2). Pockets of industrial parcels are wthin the Light Manufacturing and Industry (M- 1) district and mobile horpe residential parcels are with°n the Residential, Mobile Home Parks and Subdivisions (R-6) or Rural Residential (R -R) distric-s. Economic Development Strategic Plan In AuWst 2011, the City aoproved the Economic Development Strategic Plan tc evaluate the economic challenges facing Clearwater, evaluate oppor_inities, and establish guiding principles, goals, and priority strateaRs to best position the City for future investment. One of the City's g gals is to "encourage the development of sites and buildings needev to accommodate higher intensity employment opportunities" Since taro -thirds of the City's property tax base is from residential development, the City understands the importance of Encouraging emplogrnent uses to help diversify the tax base and enure long-term vitality. Promoting higher intensity employment uses vill be difficult given increased regional competition, the existing stock of commercial and in,--astrial buildings it Clearwater, and lack of available greenfield sites, bot adjustments to the City's land development p,:)licies and regular ons could set the !.tage to attract target industries and higher incom E! jobs. To accomplish this goal, the Economic Development StraregicPlan included a policy to "establish an employment center owerlayto encourage higher -wage employment in strategic locati ins" The plan references the US 19 and Gulf to Bay Boulevard corridors as logical places for the rjeation of a regional employment center given their access and existing professional office developments. However, existing barriers to the ::reation of an employment district in this area, including some US 19 Re4 mmlopment plans - Context Assessment FOF - aspects of the current zoning such as height restrictions and existing commercial retail development pattern need to be addressed. The plan recommends the creation of a fixed overlay district to encourage redevelopment and infill along the US 19 corridor. Specific actions outlined as part of this strategy include: > Establish a new overlay district to encourage new Class A office developments along US 19; > Consider applying the employment center overlay to the areas between Gulf to Bay Boulevard and Drew Street appropriate for higher intensity commercial office development; > Utilize the overlay district to encourage commercial office development on sites currently occupied by strip center retail, RV parks, and mobile home parks; and > Collaborate with neighboring jurisdictions on commissioning a US 19 corridor study. Clearwater Greenprint Prepared as the community's sustainability plan, Clearwater Greenprint identifies a series of tangible actions across eight topic areas that have the potential to reduce energy consumption, pollution and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, while stimulating the local economy and improving the quality of life. Approved in December 2011, the plan was developed by the City of Clearwater with grant funding from the US Department of Energy. As the framework plan to guide local government, resident, and business actions, the plan's recommended strategies provide a foundation for addressing sustainability issues for the next 25 years. Clearwater Greenprint includes measurable, achievable strategies that the City and local residents can take to help accomplish major goals such as lessening the amount of GHG emissions, making buildings and transportation systems more energy-efficient, expanding mobility choices, maintaining a healthy economy, creating "green"jobs, reducing 2igurel'o. Weair(o®cept =tuilly 'Iwo US 19 Re:�mrelop¢nerot Fan - Fre7ne nsork Man & Concepts , , s. The Concept Studyfor the Belleair Road area mul- i -family residential to the east side of was prepared to show how the shopping the - ite serving as a transition to existi ig center site could be come a new mixed-use resit ential uses. Redevelopment coulc start destination. The sketch shows new retail with residential, retail, and smaller office and small office use s near the intersection of buildings, with the larger -scale, corporate Belleair Road and l.S 19, larger -scale office office buildings coming on-line in futu-e buildings along the US 19 frontage, and project phases. mare 30, Sayview udens Concept Study --�+"�''�"....I�''. 'Kin-•. CJS 19 MARWATER 55 •ea -nc nnr, •rove -"'cc„ `V • �:�� ;* � �y - fir• a"n..� .. r,aAw,,.....•- r�„w” `v,c`". i� vqy-ty�-`.._ JJ av qP a A. "a. M t��'ia` • seri I fs 1 40 .10 Af to � F The Concept Study for Bayview Gardens Road and a new street c■opts«}V mnection to .` and surrounding sites was prepared to Clearwater Mall are shown as key elerr ents *f - show how mixee-use buildings can be in a new netwo,k of atreets and dr ves Better ' organized to preserve the existing stream, local connectivity c,a i provide altanataves define new outdoor parks and squares, aid to travel alcng Gulf n Bi MO.,r-'--I a Me Figure Sunset Print Concept Stimly . �, �;_- � ♦� _i� ;Er�li11VG RETAii. 'VEIGHBC)RtiGQCi ' ' o " 0C-GICE & FLEX SPACE `� ri � •± � 0 wipe, • 'C ' - +Ili-�i- a �,� s • �"��,'��''s�-+R � �y �. The �•)nce�t S-udyforthe northeast consolidation,1he area can support higher- a a „ a, 4 ti 1 �► quccrant cf Sunset Point Road and US intensity office uses with neighborhood- 19 eighborhood-1t 1 trat=s hi)w employment -intensive serving retail served by a shared stormwater'� uses zan be accommodated trough management s✓stem. Through the creation th='neJeve opnent of adjacent light of a new north south street, the benefits in•j-eirial and mobile home prk sites. of access, to US 19 can be extended to sites ". � •��'�* �{aa Wt -i zoorcinand planning or parcel north of Sunset Point Road_ US 19 Redevelopment Plan - Framework Plan & Concepts CLEARWATER is fnnovr> I iqu-L, =4:b Count rys5le Sonata Cmc t Study US 19 Redevelopment Plan - Framework Plan & Concepts Street & Drive Extensions. The extension of existing public streets a -id private access drives should be encouraged to distribute traffic and improve access. Street stubs and rights-of-way should be provided to allow for connections to future development or wdevelopment on adjacent sites. The provision of a pedestrian passage within a provided public right-of-way may be permitted v% here the extension of an existing street is not possible. Street & Streetscape Design. Existing and new streets and drives should be designed to serve as both local movement corridors a id important extensions of the community's public realm. Streets and drives within and adjacent to Centers should be designed to provide for the safe, convenient, and comfortable movement of p=destrians. Existing and new streets and drives should provide q jality environments for walking, convenient connections to neighborhoods, and comfortable and safe connections between p-•oximate destinations. While the design of individual streets and d -gives may vary considerably depending on their place within the larger street network, their intended character as active, attractive, and accessible public spaces should not be compromised. MIX & DISTRIBUTION OF USES New gwdelines and standards should also require that new development and redevelopment along the corridor include a mix and intensi=O/density of land uses which help achieve the following goals: > c-- ncentrate office and other employment -intensive uses in places yr-th easy access to US 19; > provide for retail, entertainment, and other uses that serve the needs of surrounding neighborhoods; > promote high-intensity uses in close proximity to planned transit s70ps to support more intensive use of transit; > lessen demands on local and regional street network by na aximizing opportunities for the localization of work, shopping, a-tid leisure trips; ii �01 M CLEARWATER 67 Figure 39. Buildings Defi ling Streets & Public Spaces US 19 Redevelopment Plan - Pan Strategies 72 US 19 CLEARIMATER Creating Innovative places Strategy 1.4 - Encourage Employment -Intensive and Transit -Supportive Land Uses The City should explore opportunities to promote a broader range of employment -intensive and transit -supportive uses along the corridor. The City should continue working to ensure existing and new future land use classifications and zoning districts allow research and development, laboratory, and light manufacturing uses, as well as uses like office and educational facilities that may generate higher demand for transit trips. These policy and regulatory provisions could be designed to accelerate the transition from retail to other uses in the In -Between Areas of the corridor as well as provide for a wider range of uses to support the redevelopment and adaptive reuse of older commercial properties. The City should also identify a preferred list of employment -intensive land uses that may be approved administratively as long as specific minimum design and development criteria (i.e., landscaping, setbacks, buffering, and parking) are met. Such uses should include office, lodging, and other uses identified as having a positive fiscal impact and helping improve the City's job -housing balance. 2. COMPETITIVENESS Public expenditures on infrastructure and economic development programs, the implementation of development regulations and review processes, and the levy of fees and taxes all have a powerful effect on the pace and pattern of private investment. To maximize its potential to spark reinvestment and redevelopment along US 19, the City should realign actions and programs affecting the corridor's competitive position. Organized around the following broad categories, these strategies are designed to help accelerate the pace of improvement .along the corridor as US 19 improvements continue and national and regional economic conditions improve. US 19 Redevelopment Plan - Plan Strategies The competitiveness strategies for the US 19 corridor are organized around the following broad categories: > Expand Development Incentives; > Facilitate Review Processes; > Create a Corridor Improvement Organization; > Install Wayfinding Signs; > Strengthen Brand Identity; and > Enhance Gateways, Landscapes & Streetscapes. Strategy 2.1- Expand Development Incentives The City should expand the current list of direct and indirect assistance available to projects that advance local economic development goals and improve the corridor's competitive position in the Tampa Bay Region. Specifically, the City should explore the potential to reduce permit fees, provide local economic development tax exemptions using the authority approved by voters in November 2012, and offer other direct or indirect financial incentives for projects along US 19 that advance economic development objectives in the Economic Development Strategic Plan (2011). The City should also work with local stakeholders to identify strategies and funding sources to support individual property owner efforts to fix -up and clean-up existing sites and buildings, or, where reinvestment may be infeasible, remove older buildings. Such a program could be modeled after the existing programs in Downtown Clearwater. Through the downtown Fagade Improvement Program, the City of Clearwater Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) seeks to help improve the attractiveness of buildings and the overall attractiveness of Downtown by providing financial assistance for fagade design services and the completion of improvement projects. Under the program, owners can access up to $3,000 of design assistance from local architects and up to $10,000 of grant and $25,000 of loan funds. we 17-!Z 201- i; Clearwater, FL Community Development Code Section 4-602. - Zoning Atlas amendments. A. Purpose and applicability. It is the purpose of this section to establish a procedure for amending the Zoning Atlas of the city in accordance with Florida Statutes. B. Application/initiation requirements. An application for an amendment of the Zoning Atlas of the city may be initiated by the city council, the community development coordinator, the community development board or by the owner of the property or his representative which is the subject of the amendment. Proposed Zoning Atlas amendment applications shall include such information as is applicable in Section 4-202.A and the fee required by Section 4-202.F. C. Staff review and recommendation. After the community development coordinator has reviewed the application with the development review committee in accordance with the provisions of Section 4-202(C) and (D), he shall send a written report and recommendation to the community development board, with a copy to the applicant, if any, setting forth whether the application should be approved, approved with conditions or denied and the grounds for such recommendation. D. Community development board review/recommendation. Upon receipt of the recommendation of the community development coordinator, the community development board shall conduct a public hearing on the application in accordance with the requirements of Section 4-206 and issue a recommended order to the city council setting forth the board's findings in regard to whether the proposed amendment will satisfy the standards set forth in Section 4-602(F) and may include any proposed modifications or conditions to the proposed amendment. E. City council review/decision. Upon receipt of the recommended order of the community development board, the city council shall conduct a public hearing in accordance with the provisions of Section 4-20 and shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny the amendment. Upon adoption of an ordinance amending the Zoning Atlas, the Zoning Atlas shall be deemed amended as of the effective date of the ordinance. The community development coordinator shall revise and may republish from time to time the Zoning Atlas or portions thereof as amended, but a failure to revise or republish shall not affect the validity of any ordinance amending the Zoning Atlas. F. Standards for review. No amendment to the Zoning Atlas shall be approved unless the city council finds that such amendment complies with the following standards: 1. The proposed amendment is consistent with and furthers the goals, policies and objectives of the comprehensive plan and furthers the purposes of this Development Code and other city ordinances and actions designed to implement the plan. 2. The available uses to which the property may be put are appropriate to the property which is subject to the proposed amendment and compatible with existing and planned uses in the area. 3. The amendment does not conflict with the needs and character of the neighborhood 1/2 1 2.12 =2Q1 �r•< Clearwater, FL Community Development Code and the city. 4. The amendment will not adversely or unreasonably affect the use of other property in the area. 5. The amendment will not adversely burden public facilities in an unreasonably or disproportionate manner. 6. The district boundaries are appropriately drawn with due regard to locations and classifications of streets, ownership lines, existing improvements and the natural environment. (Ord. No. 6928-02, § 105, 5-2-02; Ord. No. 8310-12, § 7, 2-2-12; Ord. No. 8806-16, § 2, 5-5-16) 2/2 10 DEVELOPER CREDENTIALS Jonathan M. Dorman, P.E. Business Experience: 1995 - 2007 Office Leader, Wal-Mart Team Leader, and Company Shareholder, Kimley- Horn and Associates, Inc., Tampa, Florida (also Sarasota, FL; Raleigh, NC; and Charlotte, NC). Company Vice President and leader of a 45 -person office consulting to multiple clients and disciplines of civil engineering. 2007 - Present Co-founded StorCon Development, LLC, 50% owner and president. Company purpose is to locate sites, develop and construct new self storage facilities primarily in Florida. Developed and/or managed 25 self -storage facilities in Florida and North Carolina. Budget Management, Inc. — 50% owner and vice president. Self Storage management company that directs operations and financial management of all Florida self storage facilities, including property management of all facilities formerly branded as "Budget Self Storage". Education: 1995 Bachelor of Science Civil Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 1997 Master of Civil Engineering, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida Professional Licensure: Professional Engineer Licensed in Florida and N. Carolina Real Estate Agent Licensed in Florida References for Jonathan Dorman: Mr. John Patterson, Esq. Shutts & Bowen, LLP 46 North Washington Boulevard, Suite 1 Sarasota, FL 34236 (941) 365-0550 Mr. Jim Porter, Esq. Adams & Reese, LLP Bank of America Building 101 E. Kennedy Blvd, Suite 4000 Tampa, Florida 33602 (813) 402-2869 Mr. Scott Gilner, P.E. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. The Franklin Exchange 615 North Franklin Street, Suite 150 Tampa, Florida 33602 813-620-1460 Mr. Gerald E. Ludwig, Jr. Ludwig -Walpole Company 300 S. Orange Avenue Sarasota, FL 34236 (941) 487-1244 Richard B. Bennett Business Experience: 1960 -1967 Incorporated Richard Bennett Homes, Ltd. in London, Ontario, building and marketing approximately 300 custom homes. Acted as President and CEO. 1967 - 1969 Incorporated Bennett -Webb Ltd. in London, Ontario. Built and sold three rental projects, totaling approximately 200 units. Acted as President and CEO 1970 -1981 Incorporated the Richard Bennett Corp. in London, Ontario. Built and sold approximately 1500 units of rental town houses, condominiums and apartments, 1.5 million square feet of commercial and industrial lease back space, and developed and subdivided plans of subdivisions. Acted as President and CEO. 1977 - 1981 Incorporated Bennett -Hunt, Ltd. in Sarasota, Florida. Built and sold Lawrence Point Condominiums, Lido Towers Condominiums, and Bayport Beach and Tennis Condominiums. Developed and sold the land for the Beaches of Longboat and Longboat Cove. Also, purchased Bird Bay Shopping Plaza, finished its construction, and leased and later sold the same. 1982 - present Develop and manage over 45 of self -storage facilities in Florida, North Carolina, and Ontario under the trade name of Budget Self Storage and Self Storage Plus, and currently active in expanding these operations. Currently 50% owner of StorCon Development, LLC; and 50% owner and President of Budget Management, Inc. References for Richard B. Bennett: Mr. Ted Starkey Mr. John Patterson, Esq. Wells Fargo Securities Shutts & Bowen, LLP 100 S. Ashley Drive #950 46 North Washington Boulevard, Suite 1 Tampa, FL 33602 Sarasota, FL 34236 (813) 276-6632 (941) 365-0550 Mr. Jeff Cash Mr. Dick Goble, CPA Regions Bank Kerkering and Barberio & Co. PA 13535 Feather Sound Drive #610 1858 Ringling Blvd. Clearwater, FL 33762 Sarasota, FL 34230 (813) 538-1195 (941) 365-4617 Life Storage 1705 W. Kennedy Blvd. a Tampa, Florida )f Opened July, 2017 e 1 ti k. Extra Space Storage 11097 University Blvd. Orlando, Florida Ananad Anril_ 2n17 F B Ul 0 u Ul 0 0 1 H! li] D 0 0 ni ull Lil u III v di 1 1 s a a N Hi LIJ u U u u �1� LifeStorage (fka Uncle Bob's)�a+ 8354 W. Hillsborough Ave. Tampa, Florida Opened October, 2009 tik d 1 w D STORCONLuB lu GjE:T :FimuR..M.E DEVELOPMENT, ux SELF STORAGE EXPERIENCE f 0 I '' a -a FE -00 E Portfolio Currently Owned: Self Storage Experience East Hillsborough Storage Associates, Tampa, FL — 40.0% owner and managing partner in a 70,099 nrsf (790 unit) storage facility. Under construction, opening Summer, 2018. 4th Street Storage Associates, St. Petersburg, FL — 40.2% owner and managing partner in a 54,055 nrsf (658 unit) storage facility. Under construction, opening Summer, 2018. Robinhood Storage Associates, Winston-Salem, NC — 20% owner and managing partner in an 71,005 nrsf (775 unit) storage facility. Under construction, opening Spring, 2018. MCC Storage Associates, Charlotte, NC — 24% owner and managing partner in a 65,977 nrsf (681 unit) storage facility. Under construction, opening Winter, 2017. Morehead Storage Associates, Charlotte, NC — 50% owner and managing partner in a 71,780 nrsf (863 unit) storage facility. Under construction, opening Fall, 2017. Kennedy Storage Associates, Tampa, FL — 42.4% owner and managing partner in a 52,692 nrsf (634 unit) storage facility. Opened July, 2017. Tyrone Storage Associates, St. Petersburg, FL — 39.8% owner and managing partner in an 69,764 nrsf (750 unit) storage facility. Opened June, 2017. Sandrala Storage Associates, Sarasota, FL — 40.3% owner and managing partner in a 53,236 nrsf (629 unit) storage facility. Opened June, 2016. Semoran Storage Associates, Orlando, FL — 42.2% owner and managing partner in an 60,855 nrsf (717 unit) storage facility. Opened December, 2015 Bloomingdale Storage Associates, Brandon, FL — 50% owner and managing partner in an 68,202 nrsf (663 unit) storage facility. Opened March, 2014. Gunn Storage Partnership, LLC, Tampa, FL 28% owner and managing partner in an 65,128 sf (813 unit) storage facility. Opened May, 2000. Gandy Storage Partnership, St. Petersburg, FL — 28.25% owner and managing partner in a 74,844 nrsf (858 unit) storage facility. Opened May, 1999. Fruitville Road Storage Partnership, Sarasota, FL — 31 % owner and managing partner in a 48,142 nrsf (609 unit) storage facility. Opened March, 1997. Bee Ridge Storage Partnership, Sarasota, FL 20% partner and managing partner in a 62,946 nrsf (789 unit) storage facility. Opened October, 1994. Page 2 of 5 I 0=11 L5_io Wtv �_� Self Storage Experience STo On O 49th Street Storage Partnership, St. Petersburg, FL — 24% owner and managing partner in a 66,539 nrsf (780 unit) storage facility. Opened March, 1991. Self Storaae Facilities Previously Owned and Sold: Hillsborough Storage Associates, Tampa, FL — 38.2% owner and managing partner in a 78,665 nrsf (816 unit) storage facility. Opened October, 2009. SOLD TO PUBLIC STORAGE July, 2017. Stormerica, LLC, Orlando, FL — 100% owner of a 66,787 nrsf (667 unit) storage facility. COMPLETED AND SOLD TO EXTRA SPACE STORAGE April, 2017. Corsoto Storage Associates, Sarasota, FL — 35.6% owner and managing partner in an 85,000 gsf (728 unit) storage facility. Opened August, 2009. SOLD TO PUBLIC STORAGE January, 2016. Corsoto Storage Associates, Bradenton, FL — 35.6% owner and managing partner in a 67,000 gsf (471 unit) storage facility. Opened June, 2009. SOLD TO PUBLIC STORAGE January, 2016. Valrico Storage Associates, Valrico, FL — 38.8% owner and managing partner in an 80,000 gsf (725 unit) storage facility. Opened February, 2009. SOLD TO W.P. CAREY January, 2015. Harris Blvd. Storage Partnership LLC, Charlotte, NC — 27.5% owner and managing partner in an 85,000 gsf (748 unit) storage facility. SOLD TO PUBLIC STORAGE May, 2014. Albemarle Storage Partnership LLC, Charlotte, NC — 27.5% owner and managing partner in an 86,700 gsf (867 unit) storage facility. SOLD TO PUBLIC STORAGE May, 2014. TriStore Storage Partnership (Crump Road, Tryon Street, and Sharon Amity), Charlotte, NC. 30% owner and managing partner in a three -facility portfolio totaling approximately 225,000 gsf (1,856 units). SOLD TO PUBLIC STORAGE May, 2014. 22nd Avenue Associates, St. Petersburg, FL — 85% owner and managing partner in a 97,000 gsf (880 unit) storage facility. Opened November, 2007. SOLD TO W.P. CAREY January 2014. Clearwater Storage Company LLC, Clearwater, FL — 50% owner and managing partner in a 75,000 gsf (806 unit) storage facility. SOLD TO SOVRAN SELF STORAGE December 2012 Page 3 of 5 Self Storage Experience Drew Street Storage Partnership LLC, Clearwater, FL — 37% owner and managing partner in a 60,000 gsf (628 unit) storage facility. SOLD TO SOVRAN SELF STORAGE December 2012 Manatee Avenue Storage Partnership, Bradenton, FL — 31% owner and managing partner in a 75,000 gsf (812 unit) storage facility. Opened March, 1998. SOLD TO SOVRAN SELF STORAGE December 2012 Cleveland Storage Partnership, Ft. Myers, FL 26% owner and managing partner in a 58,000 gsf storage facility. Opened June, 1998. SOLD TO SOVRAN SELF STORAGE December 2012 University Pkwy Storage Partnership, Winston-Salem, NC 30.7% owner and managing partner in a 64,000 gsf storage facility. Opened June, 1998. SOLD 2007 Lawndale Storage Partnership, Greensboro, NC 28% owner and managing partner in a 82,000 gsf storage facility. Opened Jan. 1999. SOLD 2007 Peters Creek Storage Partnership LLC, Winston-Salem, NC — 28% owner and managing partner in a 68,000 gsf storage facility. SOLD 2007 High Point Storage Partnership LLC, Greensboro, NC — 30% owner and managing partner in an 82,000 gsf storage facility. SOLD 2007 Adelaide Street Storage JV, London, Ontario. 17.8% owner and managing partner in a 66,000 gsf storage facility. SOLD, 2006 Commissioners Road Storage, London, Ontario. 55,000 gsf storage facility. SOLD 2006 Sheppard Avenue East, Toronto, Ontario 18% owner of a 93,000 gsf storage facility. SOLD October 2006 Kipling Avenue, Toronto, Ontario. 18% owner of a 100,000 gsf storage facility. SOLD 2006 Todd Bayliss Blvd., Toronto, Ontario. 14% owner of a 100,000 gsf storage facility. SOLD 2006 *Largo Storage, Inc. Completed construction of a 67,000 gsf (802 unit) storage facility June, 1985. Owned by Florida Storage Associates. SOLD TO SOVRAN SELF STORAGE Ultra Storage Partnership, St. Petersburg, FL. 50,000 gsf storage facility. Owned by Florida Storage Associates January, 1988. SOLD TO PUBLIC STORAGE Page 4 of 5 i7 ME, Self Storage Experience 't ti 22nd Avenue Associates. St. Petersburg, FL 33 1/3% partner in a 74,000 gsf (948 unit) storage facility. SOLD TO SAFEGUARD STORAGE Shannsongs, Inc., Venice, FL 33 1/3% partner in a 43,000 gsf (546 unit) storage facility SOLD TO PUBLIC STORAGE *Dollar Storage, Belcher Road, Clearwater, FL Owned by Florida Storage Associates. 54,000 gsf (677 unit) storage facility. SOLD TO SOVRAN SELF STORAGE *Dollar Storage, Columbus Avenue, Tampa, FL Owned by Florida Storage Associates. 76,000 gsf (917 unit) storage facility. SOLD TO SOVRAN SELF STORAGE Bradenton Storage Partnership - Bradenton, FL 50% partner and managing partner in a 72,000 gsf (700 unit) storage facility. SOLD TO METRO STORAGE Waters Avenue Storage Partnership, Tampa, FL 20% partner and managing partner in a 66,000 gsf (575 unit) storage facility. SOLD TO SOVRAN SELF STORAGE Dale Mabry Storage Partnership, Tampa, FL 20% partner, and managing partner in a 71,000 gsf (792 unit) storage facility. Opened in April, 1996. SOLD Self Storage Facilities Foreclosed or Sold Under Short Sale: NONE. Page 5 of 5 11 Curriculum Vitae of Dennis J. Noto MAI, State -Certified General Real Estate Appraiser and Realtor REAL ESTATE EXPERIENCE Dennis Noto & Associates LLC: Jan., 2000 to Present, Principal and Commercial Real Estate Appraiser Balseiro & Associates, Inc.: 1990 to 1999, Vice President and Manager of Commercial Real Estate Appraisals. Dennis J. Noto Realty, Inc. and related entities.: 1982-1990, Co-owner and Licensed Real Estate Broker of brokerage and development entities involved in multi -family, retail, office, and commercial properties. Brokered, invested, developed, and managed real estate. Site Selection Consultants, Inc.: 1976-1982. Vice President and Licensed Real Estate Broker. Provided economic feasibility studies, branch and de -novo bank applications, and real estate brokerage for financial institutions. First Federal Savings and Loan Association of Tampa: 1972-1976. Assistant Vice President of office development and operations. Real estate acquisition and economic feasibility studies. Exchange National Bank of Tampa: 1969-1972. Marketing Research and Management Trainee. REAL ESTATE EDUCATION (abridged) Fundamentals of Separating Real Property, Personal Property and Intangible Business Assets; Analyzing Operating Expenses; Subdivision Valuation; Florida State Law; National USPAP; Apartment Appraising; Business Practice and Ethics; Litigation Appraising; Condemnation Appraising; Appraiser as an Expert Witness; REO Appraisal; Market Analysis/Site to Do Business; Special Purpose Properties; Option Value; Analyzing Distressed Properties; Basic Principles and Advanced Topics; Florida Condemnation and Appraiser Liability; Report Writing and Valuation Analysis; Advanced Applications; Capitalization Theory and Techniques; Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice; Basic Valuation Procedures; Real Estate Appraisal Principles; Financing Commercial Real Estate; USPAP Law Update; CLE on Eminent Domain. EDUCATION University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, B.A. in Business Administration; University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida; Jesuit High School, Tampa, Florida. PROFESSIONAL AND OTHER DESIGNATIONS/AFFILIATIONS Appraisal Institute -Member (MAI) State -Certified General Real Estate Appraiser (RZ1817) Appraisal Institute -Advanced Professional Development/Member of (1) SBA Going Concern Registry, (2) Litigation Registry and (3) Valuation of Business Enterprise Registry Licensed Real Estate Broker and Realtor (GTAR) Economic Club of Tampa Bay -Member Impact Tampa Bay -Past Board Member Lifework Leadership -Past Board Member Association of Eminent Domain Professionals -Member & Past Director Tampa Sports Club and Foundation -Past President National Multiple Sclerosis Society/Gulf Coast -Past President University of South Florida Alumni/Hillsborough-Past President Bayside Community Church -Member OTHER Expert Witness in real estate before Federal and State courts, State Office of the Comptroller, Div. of Banking, FDIC, FDOT, and local judicial systems. Clients have included U.S. Dept. of Justice, State Dept. of Insurance; Forbes 400 individuals, county school boards; counties and cities; attorneys (litigation, estate and eminent domain cases); financial institutions; CPAs; pro sports teams; asset managers; developers and investors. Speaker at Continuing Legal Education and Florida Water Management District. N RIM EL.=69.86' 24" RCP O W (9 Z z Z 337.82' FOUND FOUND CAPPED IRON PIPE (SIZE NOTED) XA BENCHMARK . . - . - . 8" CLAY RIM EL.=69.82 ('RE QED PIPE /-NS-65 • 70.04'-1 x 69h ss'� 6966 o� FCM 4X4 m 'U-)V rn(0'DID 69.52' m co ro ID z 3: W 9.46' o: Z 6" PVC I 064 X. I 70.27' 70.41 v io p� N RIM EL.=70.30' w=66.82. NOTES: 1. SURVEY CREW: DAN McINTURFF, DINO SPENDL. 2. NO UNDERGROUND INSTALLATIONS OR IMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN LOCATED EXCEPT AS SHOWN. 3. NO INSTRUMENTS OF RECORD REFLECTING EASEMENTS, RIGHT OF WAY AND/OR OWNERSHIP WERE FURNISHED TO THIS SURVEYOR EXCEPT AS SHOWN, 4. THIS I SURVEY RV Y D OE S NOT REFLECT OR DETERMINE OWNERSHIP. 5. USE OF THIS SURVEY BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THOSE PREPARED FOR WILL BE THE RE -USERS SOLE RISK WITHOUT LIABILITY TO THE SURVEYOR. 6. THERE MAY BE ITEMS DRAWN OUT OF SCALE TO GRAPHICALLY SHOW THEIR LOCATION. 7. THE SURVEY WAS PREPARED PER TITLE COMMITMENT BY CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY;, ORDER No.:6379860. EFFECTIVE DAT: MAY 17, 2017 AT 5:00 PM, AND IS SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND SIMILAR MATTERS OF TITLE. B. NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER. 9. ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE IN FEET AND REFER TO THE NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988. (N.A.V.D.) REFERENCE BENCHMARK No.1: CITY OF CLEARWATER BENCHMARK "E-09" ELEVATION = 71.87' 10. PROPERTY LIES IN FLOOD ZONE "X" ACCORDING TO FEMA MAP 12103CO109H, EFFECTIVE DATE 5/17/2005. SECTION 14 TOWNS -HIP 29 SOUTH RANGE 15 EAST f r- ASPHALT J .ASO LEGAL DESCRIPTION (FROM TITLE COMMITMENT): Parcel I: A parcel of land In the SW 1 4 of the NE 1 4 of Section 14 Township 29 South Range 15 East Pinellas p / / p g , County, Florida, further described as follows: Start at the SE corner of the SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 14, Township 29 South, Range 15 East, and go N 01 degrees 11'31" W, along the 40 acre line, 50.14 feet; thence go N 88 degrees 47' 06" W, 58.31 feet to the point of intersection of the West right-of-way line of Duncan Avenue and the North right-of-way line of Gulf to Bay Boulevard; thence N 00 degrees 33' 28" W, along the West right-of-way line of Duncan Avenue, 280.00 feet to the Point of Beginning of this description; thence N 88 degrees 47'06" W, 395.63 feet; thence N 00 degrees 39' 25" W, 308.52 feet to a point on the South right-of-way line of Rainbow Drive; thence S 88 degrees 56'09" E, along the South right-of-way line of Rainbow Drive, 396.14 feet to a point of intersection with the West right-of-way line of Duncan Avenue; thence 5 00 degrees 33' 28" E, along the West right-of-way line -of Duncan Avenue 309.54 feet to the Point of Beginning. PARCEL II: A parcel of land lying in the SW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 14, Township 29 South, Range 15 East, Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida, and being further described as follows: Commence at the SE corner of the SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of said Section 14; run thence N 01 degrees 11' 31" W, 50.04 feet (as shown In Deed, 50.14 as measured) along the 40 acre line; run thence N 88 degrees 47'06" W, 393.48 feet along the Northerly right-of-way line of Gulf -to -Bay Boulevard to the Point of Beginning; continue thence N 88 degrees 47'06" W, 60.00 feet along said Northerly right-of-way line of Gulf -to -Bay Boulevard; run thence N 00 degrees 39' 25" W, 280.00 feet; run thence S 88 degrees 47'06" E, 60.00 feet; run thence S 00 degrees 39' 25" E, 280.00 feet to a point in the North right-of-way line of Gulf -to -Bay Boulevard the Point of Beginning. CONTAINING 3.196 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. PINEL_L.AS COUNTY h N RIM EL.=69.56' :1N-65.66' W=66.38' S=65.57' FLORIDA SCHEDULE BII EXCEPTIONS: 1. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires for value of record the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. (NOTA MATTER OF SURVEY) 2. Taxes and assessments for the year 2017 and subsequent years, which are not yet due and payable. (NOT A MATTER OF SURVEY) 3. Standard Exceptions: A. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land. (NOT A MATTER OF SURVEY) B. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. (NOT A MATTER OF SURVEY) C. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, or materials heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. (NOT A MATTER OF SURVEY) D. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens in the public records. (NOT A MATTER OF SURVEY) 4. Non -Exclusive Grant of Easement, recorded in Official Records Book 4243, Page 749. (AFFECTS PARCEL II, BLANKET IN NATURE) S. Easement in favor of Florida Power. Corporation, recorded in Official Records Book 4249, Page 1975. (AFFECTS PARCEL I, BLANKET IN NATURE) 6. Easement in favor of Florida Power Corporation, recorded in Official Records Book 4359, Page 69. (AFFECTS PARCEL 11, SHOWN) 7. Rights of tenamt(s) in possession, if any, under lease(s) not recorded in the Public Records. (NOT A MATTER OF SURVEY) N1'11'31"W (R) N 1 °07'39 "W (C) 50.14' (R) N88.47'06"W (R) (7 N88°47'16"W (C) I 58. 19' (C)Z 0 0) Z)�w LL, w U) LEGEND N RIM EL.=67.58' I F- Z LU NOT TO SCALE N=62 05' N RIM EL.=66.85' GRAPHIC SCALE 30 0 15 30 60 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 30 ft. N=64.23' O W (9 Z z Z FND, FCIP FOUND FOUND CAPPED IRON PIPE (SIZE NOTED) 11 BENCHMARK . . - . - . 8" CLAY I" U- FCIR FOUND CAPPED IRON ROD (SIZE NOTED) • BOLLARD/POST CEDAR Z W O FCM FIP FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT SIZE NOTED) FOUND IRON PIPE CHINABERRY BURIED CATV MARKER a = CITRUS (SIZE NOTED)A© Q POST FN&D LB5985FIR N RIM EL.=66.64' F d'F-SIZE W njA y0 FOUND IRON ROD NOTED ( ) ELM CABLE TV BOX W=64.28' Z O0 FN&D FOUND NAIL &BRASS DISK JACARANDA 60 69. O FPP FOUND PINCHED PIPE (SIZE NOTED) { CONCRETE LIGHT POLE FIR 1/2BENT WFRR N FOUND RAILROAD SPIKE OAK ¢ 0.2' E 2 W N PK PARKER KAYLON NAIL PINE CONCRETE UTILITY POLE PODACARPUS 2 = D- SCIR SET 1/2" CAPPED IRON ROD "LB 4513"0 C7 (NO ACCESS) ' 00 x6A�� , xL-69.71' O - X SN&D SET NAIL & BRASS DISK "LB 4513" CLEANOUT LL O U) LB LICENSED BUSINESS A DECORATIVE LIGHT Z O PLS PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR INLET C CALCULATED El ELECTRIC BOX X0°'^ Z I- `- O W R) RECORDED 0.7' S --� Z P' M MEASURED OE ELECTRIC MANHOLE X 690 O W a M `- P� PB PLAT PLAT BOOK ® ELECTRIC METER I- Z PG PAGE ® FIBER OPTIC CABLE BOX I LL POB POINT OF BEGINNING O I- POC` POINT OF COMMENCEMENT FIRE HYDRANT W W BFP BACKFLOW PREVENTER ® GAS MARKER POST Z to CLD CENTERLINE DITCH z DIA. DIAMETER © GAS METER/REGULATOR O DCV DOUBLE CHECK VALVE GAS VALVE (� EL. ELEVATION FFE FIIN/IIS TFLOOR ELEVATION © GREASE -TRAP MANHOLE I LU NV No. NUMBER GUY WIRE ORB OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK ICV R/W RIGHT OF WAY M IRRIGATION CONTROL VALVE I TBM TEMPORARY BENCHMARK ® MAIL BOX TOB TOP OF BANK TOS TOE OF SLOPE 3 METAL LIGHT POLE UG UG TYPICAL UNDERGROUND METAL UTILITY POLE NORTHERLY RNV LINE I A/C AIR CONDITIONER ® MONITOR WELL BWF BARB WIRE FENCE CLF CHAIN LINK FENCE ® RECLAIMED WATER METER BOX WDF WOOD PANEL FENCE RECLAIMED WATER VALVE C/B CONCRETE BLOCK C&G CURB AND GUTTER crd ROOF DRAIN �- FCG F -TYPE CURB AND GUTTER VCG VALLEY CURB AND GUTTER QS SANITARY MANHOLE I CMP CORRUGATED METAL PIPE SV DIP DUCTILE IRON PIPE SANITARY VALVE ERCP ELLIPTICAL REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE OI SIGN HDPE HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE PIPE I M PVC POLYVINYL CHLORIDE PIPE SOIL BORING LOCATION RCP REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE EOP EDGE OF PAVEMENT Up STORM OR DRAINAGE MANHOLE CONC CONCRETE STREET LIGHT ACCESS BOX I FES MES FLARED END SECTION MITERED END SECTION O TELECOMMUNICATIONS MANHOLE FCIR 5/SILL FOC MH FIBER TIC CABLE MANHOLE © TELEPHONE BOX a I OHW OVERHEAD WIRES (CABLE, TELEPHONE, ELECTRICAL) ® TELEPHONE LINE MARKER POST TRAN TRANSFORMER ,Q 3 -CTV- PAINT OR FLAG MARKING UG CABLE TELEVISION LINE la TRAFFIC SIGNAL ACCESS BOX r` -E- PAINT OR FLAG MARKING UG ELECTRIC C70-,> TRAFFIC SIGNAL POLE Op ro -FOC- PAINT OR FLAG MARKING UG FOC QV VERIZON ACCESS BOX Z PAINT OR FLAG MARKING UG GAS LINE O WATER MANHOLE ` -RCW-- PAINT OR FLAG MARKING UG RECLAIMED WATER- ® WATER VALVE -S- PAINT OR FLAG MARKING UG SANITARY SEWER © WATER METER BOX `T_ PAINT OR FLAG MARKING UG TELEPHONE LINE O WELL I -VZ- PAINT OR FLAG MARKING UG VERIZON LINE WOOD LIGHT POLE -W- PAINT OR FLAG MARKING UG WATER LINE WOOD UTILITY POLE I TREE LEGEND a I ® BAY `ne a CONCRETE I m MEDIAN 8" CLAY CARROTWOOD CI CEDAR ® c-69.33' I CHINABERRY ® a Q CITRUS ,yp 96 Q $ 01 60' 60 njA y0 X ELM 60,• HICKORY IF X X0. ° JACARANDA 60 69. O s69 y0 X MAPLE x 0ph^ x FIR 1/2BENT E i N 0.1' S OAK ¢ 0.2' E PALM PINE PODACARPUS ® INLET , C7 (NO ACCESS) ' 00 x6A�� , xL-69.71' x-69.57' N RIM EL.=68.50' I W-65.05' 15" RCP S=62.24' CONCRETE TOP 8"DIP=66.11' MEDIAN 15" RCP INLET I 68.53' (NO ACCESS) 6^ X6b 0 X0°'^ Z FCIR 5/8L67386 , 0.7' S --� 1.4' W 1 O 6g• X 690 1 X 690 J I68.61' 8" CLAY U' W 331.99' _ O i -N RIM EL.=70.16' N PARKING: HANDICAPPED = 7 SPACES REGULAR =190 +/- SPACES TOTAL=1 97 +/- SPACES NOTE: SOME PARKING LINES WERE TOO FADED TO DETERMINE NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES 6 e FN&D L82168 FN&D LB2168 WITH SIZES (IN INCHES) AS NOTED ® BAY `ne BOTTLEBRUSH BUSH m CAMPHOR ® CARROTWOOD CI CEDAR ® CHERRY LAUREL ® CHINABERRY ® CHINESE TALLOW Q CITRUS ® CREPE MYRTLE $ CYPRESS ELEPHANT -EAR ELM ® HICKORY IF HOLLY ° JACARANDA JAPANESE PLUM MAGNOLIA MAPLE Q MIMOSA MULBERRY } OAK ® ORCHID PALM PINE PODACARPUS ® SWEETGUM SYCAMORE p UNKNOWN OTHER (as labeled) To (name of insured, if known), (name of lender, if known), (name of insurer, if known), (names of others as negotiated with the client): This is to certify that this map or plat and the survey on which it is based were made in accordance with the 2016 Minimum Standard Detail Requirements for ALTA/ACSM Land Title Surveys, jointly established and adopted by AL TA and NSPS, and includes Items 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7,8, 9, 10 11, 13,-14, 16, 17, AND 20 of Table A thereof. The field work'was corp leteq on June 27, 2017. Date of -Plat 'r Map,June 29, 017 � r t 1( of in z 0 a- U to W 0 d v O SUOiSiA9d UJ LJ. W U j LO ami LLJ C7 m Q-0 w IL Q D D Z(D� Q O W U Q � D m Go O r E 4- U '0 L (L J J W Q. 0 r) 0 LJ... 0 NW L1. Q 0 a LL L7.. �-1 OLLJ C)% V) Q o ZQ H ry O0 - WI� ::) Q ��@ m 0> V) U Cr L,i Q I ::) Q U -I Q J - V) V)Q �� a CYo Oa t1 a d - Lo 100 n Q CO Z O M 0- FLD2017-09018 LU P`6 17-10011 REZ2017-10f-'1 2 , SYNOVUS BANK OF TAMPA BAY BROWDER DAVID JR TRE PALMER SAMUEL P JR C/O TAX APPEAL COUNSELORS LLC 305 S DUNCAN AVE PALMER SUSAN D PO BOX 2026 CLEARWATER FL 33755 216 S JUPITER AVE ROSWELL GA 30077 CLEARWATER FL 33756 GALANIDA LORI K SCHROETER JOSIE J PROIOS STAMATIOS I GALANIDA JOANNE N 1668 RAINBOW DR PROIOS JOANNA 1649 DARTMOUTH ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 1004 OAKVIEW DR CLEARWATER FL 33755 CLEARWATER FL 33756 KRUEGER & BONG-KRUEGER LINCO AUTO PARTS INC STREAMS OF LIFE CHURCH OF GOD 1651 RAINBOW DR PO BOX 15060 302 S JUPITER AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 BRADENTON FL 34280 CLEARWATER FL 33755 G P T GIG BOA PORTFOLIO OWNER RESULOVSKI SELAEDIN LA HAIE NICOLE C/O NATIONAL TAX SEARCH LLC RESULOVSKA RUZHDIMA 1673 DARTMOUTH ST 303 EAST0.123 ACKER DR STE 900 204 S DUNCAN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 CHICAGO IL 60601 CLEARWATER FL 33755 MULVIHILL GREG GULF TO BAY CENTER LLC ESA INC MULVIHILL CAROL J 2727 S OCEAN BLVD APT 906 KOUTRAS ANDREW 35246 US HWY 19 N UNIT 254 HIGHLAND BEACH FL 33487 1921 SOUVENIR DR PALM HARBOR FL 34684 CLEARWATER FL 33755 ISMAJLOVSKI KAPLAN T LIVADAROS SOTIRIA GOURDINE DAVID T 208 S DUNCAN AVE 1657 DARTMOUTH ST GOURDINE MICHELLE M CLEARWATER FL 33755 CLEARWATER FL 33755 215 S DUNCAN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 DHANA MIMOZA AUTO ZONE INC # 1298 GONZALEZ DIANNE F DHANA ROBERT C/O DEPT 8800 GONZALEZ CRUZ A SR 1660 RAINBOW DR PO BOX 2198 212 S JUPITER AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 MEMPHIS TN 38101 CLEARWATER FL 33755 RENTAL HOUSES LLC SWAY 2014-1 BORROWER LLC LOHSS FELICE A 300 S DUNCAN AVE STE 275 PO BOX 1226 301 S DUNCAN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 OAKLAND CA 94604 CLEARWATER FL 33755 HARRIS EARL W DEERWESTER PATRICIA FRAZIER'S A/C & REFRIG INC HARRIS MARGARET M 1669 DARTMOUTH ST 1709 RAINBOW DR 406 S JUPITER AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 CLEARWATER FL 33755 CLEARWATER FL 33755 THORNTONS INC DI BERNARDO ANTHONY STREAMS OF LIFE CHURCH OF GOD 10101 LINN STATION RD 1644 RAINBOW DR 301 JUPITER AVE LOUISVILLE KY 40223 CLEARWATER FL 33755 CLEARWATER FL 33755 TOWNSEND JAMES W TRE PERRI DANIEL M Board of County Commissioners TOWNSEND JANICE M TRE 1664 RAINBOW DR 315 Court Street 405 S DUNCAN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 5th Floor CLEARWATER FL 33755 Clearwater FL 33756 LOY JOHN F GULF TO BAY CENTER LLC Coalition of Clearwater Homeow 1655 DARTMOUTH ST 2727 S OCEAN BLVD APT 906 PO Box 8204 CLEARWATER FL 33755 HIGHLAND BEACH FL 33487 Clearwater FL 33758 VESTINOS FAMILY TRUST MILLARES MAIKEL D Clearwater Neighborhood Coalit VESTINOS THEODORE TRE 1660 DARTMOUTH ST Carl Schrader President 1650 RAINBOW DR CLEARWATER FL 33755 1541 S. Frederica Avenue CLEARWATER FL 33755 Clearwater FL 33756 KOUBOS LOUIS RESULOSKA AJTEN KOUBOS VERONICA 307 LIVE OAK LN 1658 RAINBOW DR LARGO FL 33770 CLEARWATER FL 33755 IRWIN JOHN VRBOS FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST IRWIN ANN K VRBOS LOVRO TRE 1016 S DUNCAN AVE 1210 PALM BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33756 DUNEDIN FL 34698 SAOULIS NORMA B 1250 MAIN LLC 205 S KEYSTONE DR 2630 WEST BAY DR STE 105 CLEARWATER FL 33755 LARGO FL 33770 HUGHES JACQUELINE M BROWN ANNA R 1661 DARTMOUTH ST 211 S KEYSTONE DR CLEARWATER FL 33755 CLEARWATER FL 33755 CREEGAN MICHAEL C NICHOLS WALTER G 334 MANATEE LN WALDRON SALLY J TARPON SPRINGS FL 34689 407 S DUNCAN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 ******** VRBOS FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST ******** VRBOS LOVRO TRE ******** 1210 PALM BLVD ******** ** ***** DUNEDIN FL 34698 TUCKER SHIRLEY G REVOCABLE TR SKYCREST NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOC. TUCKER SHIRLEY G TRE Joanna Siskin 475 ISLAND WAY 121 N. Crest Ave. CLEARWATER FL 33767 CLEARWATER FL 33755 CITY OF CLEARWATER PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE LAND USE PLAN AND ZONING ATLAS AMENDMENTS NOTE: All persons wishing to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the Community Development Board meeting. Those cases that are not contested by the applicant, staff, neighboring property owners, etc. will be placed on a consent agenda and approved by a single vote at the beginning of the meeting. The City of Clearwater, Florida, proposes to adopt the following ordinances: ORDINANCE NO. 9101-18 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY, TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF SOUTH DUNCAN AVENUE APPROXIMATELY 280 FEET NORTH OF GULF TO BAY BOULEVARD, WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS 300 SOUTH DUNCAN AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755, FROM RESIDENTIAL/OFFICE GENERAL (R/OG), TO COMMERCIAL GENERAL (CG); PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. ORDINANCE NO. 9102-18 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF THE CITY BY REZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF SOUTH DUNCAN AVENUE APPROXIMATELY 280 FEET NORTH OF GULF TO BAY BOULEVARD, WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS 300 SOUTH DUNCAN AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755, FROM OFFICE (0) TO COMMERCIAL (C); PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Schedule of Public Hearings: Tuesday, December 19, 2017 before the Community Development Board, at 1:00 p.m. Thursday, January 18, 2018 before the City Council (1St Reading), at 6:00 p.m. Thursday, February 1, 2018 before the City Council (2nd Reading), at 6:00 p.m. All public hearings on the ordinances will be held in Council Chambers, 3rd floor of City Hall, 112 South Osceola Ave., Clearwater, Florida. (Rental Houses, LLC.) LUP2017-10011/REZ2017-10012 Assigned Planner Lauren Matzke, Planning Manager (727) 562-4547 Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearing or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning and Development Director or City Clerk prior to the hearing. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board or Council, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need to request a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Sec 4-206 states that party status shall be granted by the Board in quasi-judicial cases if the person requesting such status demonstrates that s/he is substantially affected. Party status entitles parties to personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross-examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests, and needs to be requested and obtained during the case discussion before the CDB. An oath will be administered swearing in all persons giving testimony in quasi-judicial public hearing cases. If you wish to speak at the meeting, please wait to be recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons without party status speaking before the CDB shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes. The Community Development Board will review the case and make a recommendation to the City Council for final disposition. Five days prior to the CDB meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning and Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756. Please contact the Planning Department 562-4567 to discuss any questions or concerns about the project and/or to better understand the proposal. Michael Delk Rosemarie Call, MPA, CMC Planning and Development Director City Clerk City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 YOU ARE BEING SENT THIS NOTICE IF YOU ARE THE APPLICANT OR OWN PROPERTY WITHIN 200 FT OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN OFFICIAL RECORDS & LEGISLATIVE SERVICES. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL (727) 562-4093 WITH THEIR REQUEST. Ad: 12/8/17 & 1/19/17