09/18/2018 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING MINUTES
CITY OF CLEARWATER
September 18, 2018
Present: Chair Michael Boutzoukas, Vice Chair Christopher J. Anuszkiewicz, Board
Member Mary A. Lau, Board Member Mike Flanery, Board Member Jordan Behar,
Acting Board Member Elizabeth Van Scoyoc
Absent: Board Member John Quattrocki, Board Member Brian Barker
Also Present: Jay Daigneault - Attorney for the Board, Michael Fuino - Assistant City
Attorney, Michael L. Delk - Planning & Development Director, Gina Clayton - Assistant
Planning & Development Director, Patricia O. Sullivan - Board Reporter
A. CALL TO ORDER, INVOCATION, PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Chair called the meeting to order at 1:00 p.m. at City Hall, followed by the Pledge of
Allegiance.
To provide continuity for research, items are in agenda order although not
necessarily discussed in that order.
B. ROLL CALL:
C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING: August 21, 2018
Member Lau moved to approve the minutes of the August 21, 2018 Community
Development Board meeting as submitted in written summation. The motion was duly
seconded and carried unanimously.
D. CITIZENS TO BE HEARD RE ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA: None.
E. CONTINUED FROM AUGUST 21, 2018: (Items 1-4)
1. Level Two Application
Case: FLD2018-06015 — 1000 S. Myrtle Avenue and 705 Magnolia Drive
Owners: Rain Thatch Inc. and Concrete Fabricators, Inc.
Applicant: Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. (Robert Pergolizzi, 13825 ICOT Blvd., Suite
605, Clearwater, FL 33760; phone: 727-644-2695; email:
pergo a-gulfcoastconsultinginc.com)
Location: 3.11 acres at southwest corner of South Myrtle Avenue & Magnolia Drive.
Request: The Community Development Board is reviewing an 81,492 square-foot
self-storage facility use in the Commercial (C) and Industrial, Research and
Technology (IRT) Districts for the property addressed as 1000 South Myrtle Avenue
Community Development 9/18/2018 1
and 705 Magnolia Drive. The project is 28.5 feet in height in the C District and 37.33
feet in height in the IRT District, includes a minimum of 31 off-street parking spaces,
and requests allowable flexibility from height and landscape requirements (Sections
2-704.F., 2-1304.D., and 3-1202.G.).
Proposed Use: Self-Storage Warehouse
Neighborhood Association: Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition
Presenter: Robert G. Tefft, Senior Planner
It was stated information on signs for today's meeting faced the wall at the subject
property. It was hoped that the City took reasonable steps to ensure that signs were
properly posted.
Planning & Development Director Michael Delk said sometimes people moved or
removed City announcement signs. Staff tried to repost signs correctly when improper
placement was reported.
Member Lau moved to accept Robert Tefft as an expert witness in the fields of zoning,
site plan analysis, code administration, and planning in general. The motion was duly
seconded and carried unanimously.
Senior Planner Robert Tefft reviewed the Staff Report, recommending removal of
Condition of Approval #7 as proposed holly trees would conflict with trees on the adjacent
property.
An email from the adjacent property expressed concerns re sufficient landscaping
maintenance, flooding from the development, and disturbance of gas and electrical lines
and requested the developer widen and lengthen the ditch separating the properties to
stop flooding, plant crape myrtle trees rather than Engleston holly trees along the border,
and install a rear PVC fence to match existing fencing. The applicant indicated the
drainage system was designed to stop flooding.
Member Lau moved to accept Robert Pergolizzi as an expert witness in the fields of
planning, land use, and traffic impact studies. The motion was duly seconded and
carried unanimously.
Robert Pergolizzi, representing the applicant, displayed an August 8, 2018 photograph
of the sign, showing it had been posted properly; someone subsequently turned it
around.
Mr. Pergolizzi said the project would add stormwater ponds and significantly increase
open space on the site. He said the applicant agreed to plant crape myrtle trees along
the border and install PVC fencing in the rear as requested in the neighbor's email.
Community Development 9/18/2018 2
It was recommended that Condition of Approval #7 be modified to require the applicant to
plant crape myrtle trees and a new condition be added to require installation of PVC
fencing to match existing fencing in the rear.
Member Lau moved to approve Case FLD2018-06015 based on the evidence and
testimony presented in the application, the Staff Report and at today's hearing, and
hereby adopt the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law stated in the Staff Report
with conditions of approval as listed except Condition 7 to read "crape myrtle trees"
instead of holly trees and to add a condition requiring installation of PVC fencing that
matches existing fencing in the rear. The motion was duly seconded and carried
unanimously.
2. Case: LUP2018-02002 — 1510 Barry Road Level Three Application
Owner: 1510 Barry Holdings, LLC
Applicant: Todd Pressman (334 East Lake Rd., #102, Palm Harbor, FL 34695;
Phone: 727-804-1760; email: Todd(a)Pressmaninc.com)
Location: 2.137 acres located on the north side of Barry Road approximately 650
feet east of South Highland Avenue.
Request: The Community Development Board (CDB) is reviewing a request to
amend the Future Land Use Map designation from Residential/Office General
(R/OG) and Residential Urban (RU) to Institutional (I), and making a
recommendation to the City Council.
Neighborhood Association: Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition
Presenter: Lauren Matzke, AICP, Long Range Planning Manager
Planning & Development Director Michael Delk said Cases LUP2018-02002 and
REZ2018-02001 had to be continued due to advertising error. The applicant was unsure
when he could attend a future meeting. See below for motion to continue.
3. Case: REZ2018-02001 — 1510 Barry Road Level Three Application
Owner: 1510 Barry Holdings, LLC
Applicant: Todd Pressman (334 East Lake Rd., #102, Palm Harbor, FL 34695;
Phone: 727-804-1760; email: Todd(a)Pressmaninc.com)
Location: 2.137 acres located on the north side of Barry Road approximately 650
feet east of South Highland Avenue.
Request: The Community Development Board (CDB) is reviewing a request to
amend the Zoning Atlas from the Office (0) and Low Medium Density Residential
(LMDR) Districts to the Institutional (I) District, and making a recommendation to the
City Council.
Neighborhood Association: Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition
Presenter: Lauren Matzke, AICP, Long Range Planning Manager
Member Anuszkiewicz moved to continue Cases LUP2018-02002 and REZ2018-02001
to a date uncertain. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
Community Development 9/18/2018 3
4. Level Three Application
Case: TA2018-06003 —Amendments to the Community Development Code
Applicant: Brian J. Aungst, Jr, Esq. and Shaun Amarnani, Esq. (MacFarlane,
Ferguson & McMullen, 625 Court Street, Suite 200, Clearwater, FL 33756)
Request: The Community Development Board (CBD) is reviewing a request to
amend the Clearwater Community Development Code, to expand the allowance of
self-storage warehouses as a Flexible Standard Use to the Regional Center
Subdistrict of the U.S. Zoning District, where it is currently allowed only in the
Corridor Subdistrict, and making a recommendation to the City Council.
Neighborhood Associations: Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition, Tropic Hills
HOA, Glen Ellen MHP Association, Island in the Sun, Village on the Green- Condo
I'll & III.
Presenter: Lauren Matzke, AICP, Long Range Planning Manager
Member Anuszkiewicz reported he had a conflict of interest.
Member Behar moved to accept Lauren Matzke as an expert witness in the fields of
zoning, annexations, land use/rezoning applications and demographics, land
development code & land development code amendments, and general planning. The
motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
Long Range Planning Manager Lauren Matzke said applicant modifications to the
proposed Ordinance since last month's meeting were insufficient to change staff's
recommendation that the board deny this request. She reviewed the Staff Report.
Attorney Brian Aungst, representing the applicant, said application changes were based
on board member input. He said none of the 43 retailers that looked at the site since
2015 expressed interest in developing it with office, retail, or restaurant uses. He
reviewed difficulties with the site and current homeless activity. He said as now
proposed, 100% of the frontage and at least 20% of the ground floor would have active
uses other than self-storage. He said Orlando, Charlotte, and Miami allowed self-
storage in areas with the same development strategies and goals as Clearwater's US
19 zoning plan. He said Tampa's Westshore Boulevard was similar to US 19 and
allowed air-conditioned self-storage as a right with no associate uses.
Attorney Aungst said the proposed Ordinance would affect 15 lots by Countryside Mall
and 3 by Clearwater Mall, eliminate "D" and "E" frontages, increase the number of
parking spaces, and be governed by stricter rules than Orlando, Charlotte, and Miami
had. He said the majority of City Council supported self-storage in major activity
centers. He said the proposal would provide mixed-uses and meet many goals of the
City plan. He said the subject site could not accommodate a pedestrian oriented
building as sought in the US 19 zoning plan; a 90,000 square-foot office building could
never be built there.
Community Development 9/18/2018 4
In response to a concern that the Ordinance change would allow the Toys `R' Us site to
be redeveloped with self-storage which would not generate many jobs, Attorney Aungst
said self-storage needed to be near multifamily developments but 3 miles apart to be
marketable. He said the Toys `R' Us site had many other development opportunities due
to its much larger size and better access to US 19. Concern was expressed that busses
would not stop at a parcel few people wanted to visit and a self-storage facility would
not beautify the area. Attorney Aungst said the subject site was landlocked, on a
frontage road bypassed by US 19, and would not serve as a multi modal site. He said
the proposal was an improvement to current conditions.
Concern was expressed that proposed changes would disrupt plans by nearby property
owners who anticipated development that would increase employment and enhance
their customer base. Attorney Aungst said impacts of the zoning change would be
limited, affecting only 18 parcels on US 19.
Mr. Delk said it was rare for staff to recommend denial but staff had made a huge effort
since 2011 to develop the US 19 Comprehensive Plan. He said the proposal was ill
conceived and Attorney Aungst's claim that that the proposal was better than what was
there could not be further from the truth. The proposal could not be compared to
Charlotte and Orlando which were greenfield cities or Miami with its dynamic downtown;
Westshore Boulevard was the 4t" largest business district in Florida. The US 19 corridor
provided the biggest opportunity to diversity Clearwater's economy outside downtown.
Self-storage development was permitted on US 19 outside Regional Center
Subdistricts. The proposed ordinance would affect 15 sites in the City's key major
redevelopment area, was without merit, and was not supportable.
Joseph Farrales, representing the applicant, said the current Ordinance required 900
square-feet of retail while staff reported they wanted 1,200 to 3,500 square-feet of retail
in this development. He said 3,200 square-feet of retail would be large enough to house
2 average-sized Starbucks.
Attorney Aungst said Westshore Blvd. zoning attracted mixed uses even though it did
not exclude self-storage. He said the City Council supported and initiated the proposed
zoning change as it was consistent with City goals. He said it was not suggested that
the City discard its US 19 Comprehensive Plan which supported multi modal
transportation, active mixed uses and pedestrian traffic. He said self-storage
development now permitted on US 19 abutted residential development which people
opposed. He said no one was present to oppose this Ordinance change because it
would allow self-storage development not abutting homes.
Discussion ensued with the applicant complimented for great effort but concern was
expressed that the solution for one specific challenging site required a Code change
that would affect too many properties and increasing retail at a self-storage facility did
Community Development 9/18/2018 5
not make sense. It was hoped that a level two approval opportunity could exist for
difficult properties within the US 19 zoning plan. Opposition to the proposal was
expressed as the recently adopted zoning district plan was the result of many years of
City research and analysis that included community input encouraging development of
activity centers near City malls. It was stated the current plan was designed to guide
development for the next 40 years, and while assembling properties will take time, the
community needed to give the plan time to work. Support was expressed for the current
plan's inclusion of multi modal uses and its location on high ground which was important
in the new environment.
Member Lau moved to deny Case TA2018-06003 based on the evidence and testimony
presented in the application, the Staff Report and at today's hearing and hereby adopt
the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law stated in the Staff Report. Members Lau,
Flanery, Behar, Chair Boutzoukas, and Acting Board Member Elizabeth Van Scoyoc
voted "Aye"; Member Anuszkiewicz abstained. Motion carried.
F. REQUEST TO CONTINUE TO OCTOBER 16, 2018,: (Items 1-2)
1. Level Three Application
Case: LUP2018-06005 — 1434 and 1446 North Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue
Owner: Tampa Bay Community Development Corporation
Applicant: Caprena Latimore (2139 NE Coachman Road #1, Clearwater, FL 33765;
Phone: 727-364-1491; email: caprena.tampabaycdc(agmail.com)
Location: 0.3 acres located at the southwest corner of North Martin Luther King Jr.
Avenue and Grant Street.
Request: The Community Development Board (CDB) is reviewing a request to
amend the Future Land Use Map designation from Commercial General (CG) to
Residential Medium (RM), and making a recommendation to the City Council.
Neighborhood Associations: Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition and North
Greenwood Community
Presenter: Lauren Matzke, AICP, Long Range Planning Manager
See below for motion to continue.
2. Level Three Application
Case: REZ2018-06003 — 1434 and 1446 North Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue
Owner: Tampa Bay Community Development Corporation
Applicant: Caprena Latimore (2139 NE Coachman Road #1, Clearwater, FL 33765;
Phone: 727-364-1491; email: caprena.tampabaycdc(agmail.com)
Location: 0.3 acres located at the southwest corner of North Martin Luther King Jr.
Avenue and Grant Street.
Request: The Community Development Board (CDB) is reviewing a request to
amend the Zoning Atlas from the Commercial (C) District to the Medium Density
Residential (MDR) District, and making a recommendation to the City Council.
Community Development 9/18/2018 6
Neighborhood Associations: Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition and North
Greenwood Community
Presenter: Lauren Matzke, AICP, Long Range Planning Manager
Member Anuszkiewicz moved to continue Cases LUP2018-06005 and REZ2018-06003
to October 16, 2018. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
G. CONSENT AGENDA: The following cases are not contested by the
applicant, staff, neighboring property owners, etc. and will be approved by
a single vote at the beginning of the meeting: (Items 1-3)
1. Level Two Application
Case: FLD201 8-0601 7 —852 S. Martin Luther King Jr., Avenue
Owner: Habitat for Humanity of Pinellas Co. Inc. (13355 49th Street N, Clearwater, FL
33762)
Agent: Ken Rush (13355 49th Street N, Clearwater, FL 33762; phone (727) 536-4755;
email: krusha-habitatatpinellas.org)
Location: 0.137 acre property is located on the west side of South Martin Luther
King, Jr. Avenue approximately 100 feet south of the Druid Road East and South
Martin Luther King, Jr. Avenue intersection.
Request: The Community Development Board (CDB) is reviewing a proposed
detached dwelling in the Office (0) District for the property located at 852 South
Martin Luther King, Jr. Avenue. The project is 13 feet in height, includes a minimum
of 2 off-street parking spaces, and requests allowable flexibility from setback
requirements (Section 2-1004.A).
Proposed Use: Detached Dwelling
Neighborhood Associations: Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition and North
Greenwood Community
Presenter: Kevin W. Nurnberger, Senior Planner
See below for motion to approve.
2. Level Two Application
Case: FLD2018-06020 — 101 Coronado Drive and 41 Devon Drive
Owner: Decade Companies Income Properties and Decade Sea Captain LLC
Mainstream Partners, VIII, LTD (13555 Bishop Court, Brookfield, WI 53005; phone-
262-797-9215- email: ikeier(a�decadegroup.com)
Agent: Michael J. Palmer, P.E.; Synergy Civil Engineering, Inc. (3000 Gulf to Bay
Boulevard, Suite 201, Clearwater, FL 33579; phone: 727-796-1926; email.
mpalmer(a)synergycivileng.com)
Location: 0.60 acre at the southeast corner of Coronado and Devon drives
Atlas Page: 276A
Existing Zoning: Tourist (T) District
Community Development 9/18/2018 7
Request: The Community Development Board (CDB) is reviewing a proposed
parking garage in the Tourist (T) District for the properties located at 101 Coronado
Drive and 41 Devon Drive. The project is 45 feet in height, includes a minimum of
174 parking spaces and requests allowable flexibility from lot area and setback
requirements, the Design Guidelines of Beach by Design, a two-year Development
Order and an amendment to FLD2009-03013 (overnight accommodations) to
replace the approved surface parking with the proposed parking garage (Sections 2-
803.D., 2-803.K., 4-406, and 4-407).
Proposed Use: Parking Garage and Lot (structure parking garage)
Neighborhood Associations: Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition and Clearwater
Beach Association
Presenter: Mark T. Parry, AICP, Senior Planner
Member Lau moved to approve Cases FLD2018-06017 and FLD2018-06020 on today's
Consent Agenda based on evidence in the record, including the application and the
Staff Report, and hereby adopt the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law stated in
the Staff Report, with conditions of approval as listed. The motion was duly seconded
and carried unanimously.
3. Level Three Application
Case: TA2018-07004 —Amendments to the Community Development Code
Applicant: City of Clearwater
Request: The Community Development Board (CBD) is reviewing a request to
amend the City of Clearwater's Community Development Code to repeal and
replace Chapter 51 and amend Chapter 47 to adopt new floodplain management
regulations utilizing the Florida Department of Emergency Management's (FDEM)
model ordinance, and making a recommendation to the City Council.
Neighborhood Association: Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition
Presenter: Lauren Matzke, AICP, Long Range Planning Manager
Member Lau moved to recommend approval of Case TA2018-07004 on today's Consent
Agenda based on evidence in the record, including the application and the Staff Report,
and hereby adopt the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law stated in the Staff
Report, with conditions of approval as listed. The motion was duly seconded and carried
unanimously.
H. LEVEL THREE APPLICATION: (Item 1)
1. Level Three Application
Case: DVA2009-00001A— Termination of a Development Agreement
Applicant: Decade Companies Income Properties
Request: The Community Development Board (CDB) is reviewing a termination of
the Development Agreement between Decade Companies Income Properties (the
property owner) and the City of Clearwater, which provided for the allocation of 72
Community Development 9/18/2018 8
units from the Hotel Density Reserve under Beach by Design for the property
located at 101 Coronado Drive because the applicant has successfully met the
obligations of the agreement and that the development of the property is consistent
with conceptual site plans that were part that agreement (Section 18 of the
Development Agreement), and making a recommendation to the City Council.
Neighborhood Associations: Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition and Clearwater
Beach Association
Presenter: Mark T. Parry, AICP, Senior Planner
Member Anuszkiewicz moved to accept Mark Parry as an expert witness in the fields of
redevelopment planning, comprehensive planning, annexation implementation, zoning,
land use /rezoning applications, land development, general planning, code amendments,
landscape ordinance, and special area plans /overlay districts. The motion was duly
seconded and carried unanimously.
Senior Planner Mark Parry reviewed the Staff Report.
Attorney Brian Aungst, representative for the applicant, said all obligations in the
terminated agreement were contractually fulfilled.
Member Lau moved to recommend approval of Case DVA2009- 00001A based on the
evidence and testimony presented in the application, the Staff Report and at today's
hearing, and hereby adopt the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law stated in the
Staff Report. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
I. DIRECTOR'S REPORT
In reference to last meeting's discussion re ex -parte communications, it was
recommended that members disclose ex -parte communications when the Chair
announces the agenda item. Attorney for the Board Jay Daigneault said the City
Attorney indicated the Code complied with the ex -parte disclosure requirement; he will
update the Board's Rules of Procedure with the new procedure.
J. ADJOURN
The meeting adjourned at 2:10 p.m.
Attest
Board R; % 'er
Chair
Community Develop ent Board
Community Development 9/18/2018 9
FORM 8B MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT FOR
COUNTY, MUNICIPAL, AND OTHER LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS
T NAME —FIR T NAME — MIDDLE NAME
NAME OF OARD, COUNCIL, COMMISSION, AUTHORITY, OR COMMITTEE
MAILING AD RESS
1(if 1
14 OtiklA
to
THE BOARD, COUNCIL, COMMISSION, AUTHORITY OR COMMITTEE ON
OICH I SERVE ISA UNIT OF:
CITY ❑ COUNTY ❑ OTHER LOCAL AGENCY
CITY ^
�/�
�OTjEOC1.►�
OUNTY
NAME OF POLITICAL SUBDIVISION:
DATE ON VNilt- RE�
/
//
��
MY POSITION IS:
❑ ELECTIVE i APPOINTIVE
T
WHO MUST FILE FORM 8B
This form is for use by any person serving at the county, city, or other local level of government oil'an appointed or. elected board; council,
commission, authority, or committee. It applies to members of advisory and non - advisory bodies who are presented with a voting conflict of
interest under Section 112.3143, Florida Statutes.
Your responsibilities under the law when faced with voting on a measure in which you have a conflict of interest will vary greatly depending
on whether you hold an elective or appointive position. For this reason, please pay close attention to the instructions on this form before
completing and filing the form.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 112.3143, FLORIDA STATUTES
A person holding elective or appointive county, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which
would inure to his or her special private gain or loss. Each elected or appointed local officer also MUST ABSTAIN from knowingly voting on
a measure which would inure to the special gain or loss of a principal (other than a govemment agency) by whom he or she is retained
(including the parent, .subsidiary, or sibling' organization' of a principal by which lie or she is.retained) to the special• private gain or Toss of a
relative; or to the special private gain or Toss of a business associate. Commissioners of community.redevelgpment agencies (CRAs) under
Sec. 163.356 or 1'63.357, F.S.,"arid officers of independent Special tax districts elected on a one -acre, one -vote basis are not prohibited
from voting in that capacity. „
For purposes of this law, a "relative" includes only the officer's father, mother, son; daughter, husband, wife, brother, sister, father -in -law,
mother -in -law, son -in -law, and daughter -in -law. A "business associate" means any person or entity engaged in or carrying on a business
enterprise with the officer as a partner, joint venturer, coowner of property, or corporate shareholder (where the shares of the corporation
are not listed on any national or regional stock exchange).
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
ELECTED OFFICERS:
In addition to abstaining from voting in the situations described above, you must disclose the conflict:
PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of your interest in the measure on which you are
abstaining from voting; and
WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by completing and filing this form with the person responsible for recording the
minutes of the meeting, who should incorporate the form in the minutes.
*
* * *
APPOINTED OFFICERS:
Although you must abstain from voting in' the situations described above, you are nor prohibited 'by Section 112.3143 from otherwise
participating in these matters. However, you must disclose the nature of the conflict before making any attempt to influence the decision,
whether orally or in writing and whether made by you or at your direction.
IF YOU INTEND TO MAKE ANY ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION PRIOR TO THE MEETING AT WHICH THE VOTE WILL BE
TAKEN:
• You must complete and file this form (before making any attempt to influence the decision) with the person responsible for recording the
minutes of the meeting, who will incorporate the form in the minutes. (Continued on page 2)
CE FORM 88 - EFF. 11/2013
Adopted by reference in Rule 34- 7.010(1)(f), F.A.C.
PAGE 1
APPOINTED OFFICERS (continued)
• A copy of the form must be provided immediately to the other members of the agency.
• The form must be read publicly at the next meeting 'after the form is filed.
IF YOU MAKE NO ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION EXCEPT BY DISCUSSION AT•THE MEETING:
• You must disclose orally the nature of your conflict in the measure before participating.
• You must complete the form and file it within 15 days after the vote occurs with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the
meeting, who must incorporate the form in the minutes. A copy of the form must be provided immediately to the other members of the
agency, and the form must be read publicly at the next meeting after the form is filed.
DISCLOSURE OF LOCAL OFFICER'S INTEREST
I, cfriIi.LS 05 C_iltivict hereby disclose that on 2 ` 2/
i measure came or will come before my agency which (check one or more)
inured to my special private gain or loss;
inured to the special gain or loss of my business associate,
inured to the special gain or loss of my relative
, 20 IS
inured to the special gain or loss of , by
whom I am retained; or
inured to the special gain or loss of , which
is the parent subsidiary, or sibling organization or subsidiary of a principal which has retained me.
(b) The measure before my agency and the nature of my conflicting interest in the measure is as follows:
C.CiL - r 1=3 I4,E, G.1 mil 1v/ FAxe3yrde &4Q-tT>4-'1 -,
If disclosure of specific information would violate confidentiality or privilege pursuant to law or rules governing attorneys, a public officer,
who is also an attorney, may comply with the disclosure requirements of this section by disclosing the nature of the interest in such a way
as to provide the public with notice of the conflict.
2 t �b
201
Date Filed Signatu
/.
irr■
NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES §112.317, A FAILURE TO MAKE A • • UIRE
D DIS LOSURE
CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FO OWING: IMPEACHMENT,
REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION, REDUCTION IN SALARY, REPRIMAND, OR A
CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED $10,000.
CE FORM 8B - EFF. 11/2013
Adopted by reference in Rule 34- 7.010(1)(f), F.A.C.
PAGE 2
CITY OF CLEARWATER
(:LE.aR V vr,.R PLANNING 8; DEVELOPMENT, ME E, POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
Mc Mein.. P, SI:RV1 S BUIU iNG, 100 SOUTH MYRT1E AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
Ed[HONE (727) 562 -4567
Interdepartmental Correspondence Sheet
TO: Community Development Board Members
FROM: Michael Delk, Planning and Development Director
COPIES: Michael Fuino Assistant City Attorney; Susan Chase, Documents and Records
Specialist, /Pat Sullivan, Board Reporter
SUBJECT: Agenda Items for
DATE: September 10, 2018
CDB packets being distributed contain the following.
Unapproved minutes of previous meetings August 21, 2018 to arrive
The remainder of the September CDB packet will be delivered on Thursday, September 13,
2018.
CONTINUED FROM THE MEETING OF August 21, 2018 (ITEM 1 -5)
LEVEL TWO APPLICATIONS (Item 1)
1. Case: FLD2018 -06015 —1000 S. Myrtle Avenue and 705 Magnolia Drive
Presenter: ' ..ert G. Tefft, Senior Planner
Yes: No:
LEVEL THREE APPLICATIONS (ITEMS 2 -5):
2 &3. Case: LUP2018 -02002 & REZ2018 -02001 —1510 Barry Road
Presenter: Ellen Crandall, Development Review Manager
4 &5. Case: LUP2018 -06005 & REZ2018 -06003 —1434 and 1446 North Martin Luther King Jr.
Avenue
Planner: Laufkn Matzke, AICP, Long Range Planning Manager
Yes: 1 No:
1
To be delivered on Thursday, September 13, 2018.
1. Case: TA2018 -06003 — Amendments to the Community Development Code
Level Three Application
Planner: Lauren Matzke, Long Range Planning Manager
LEVEL TWO APPLICATIONS (ITEMS 1 -2):
1. Case: FLD2018 -06017 — 852 S. Martin Luther King Jr., Avenue
Planner: Key' W. Nurnberger, Senior Planner
Yes: No:
Level Two Application
2. Case: FLD2018 -06020 — 101 Coronado Drive and 41 Devon Drive Level Two Application
Planner: M T. Parry, AICP, Senior Planner
Yes: No:
LEVEL THREE APPLICATIONS (ITEMS 1 -2):
1. Case: TA2018 -07004 — Amendments to the Community Development Code
Level Three Application
Planner: Lauren Matzke, AICP, Long Range Planning Manager
Yes: No:
2. Case: DVA2009- 00001A — Termination of a Development Agreement
Level Three Application
Planner: Mark T. Parry, AICP, Senior Planner
Yes: No:
I have conducted a /ersodnal investigation on the personal site visit to the following properties.
Signature: 1��`'I �� k.. f, Date:
) / 0 II
PRINT NAME
2