Loading...
FLD2015-06021FLD2015-06021 203 N GLENWOOD AVE Date Received: 6/1/2015 8:53:58 AM George Alexander ZONING DISTRICT: Low Medium Density Residential LAND USE: Residential Urban (7.5 du/acre) ATLAS PAGE: 279A PLANNER OF RECORD: MHB PLANNER: Melissa Hauck -Baker, Planner II INDEX PAGE PAGE NAME FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION 1 SURVEY 2 SURVEY 3 STTEPLAN EXISTING UPPER LEVEL 4 SITEPLAN EXISTING LOWER LEVEL 5 EXISTING BUILDING ELEVATIONS 6 EXISTING BUILDING ELEVATIONS 7 LANDSCAPING PLAN 203N. GLENWOODAVENUE CL, _ARWA TSR, FLORIDA 33765 INDEX o (�(` + Planning & Development Department C earwater Flexible Development Application Attached Dwellings, Mixed -Uses or Non -Residential Uses IT IS INCUMBENT UPON THE APPLICANT TO SUBMIT COMPLETE AND CORRECT INFORMATION. ANY MISLEADING, DECEPTIVE, INCOMPLETE OR INCORRECT INFORMATION MAY INVALIDATE YOUR APPLICATION. ALL APPLICATIONS ARE TO BE FILLED OUT COMPLETELY AND CORRECTLY, AND SUBMITTED IN PERSON (NO FAX OR DELIVERIES) TO THE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY NOON ON THE SCHEDULED DEADLINE DATE. A TOTAL OF it COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS AND APPLICATION MATERIALS (1 ORIGINAL AND 10 COPIES) AS REQUIRED WITHIN ARE TO BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW BY THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE. SUBSEQUENT SUBMITTAL FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD WILL REQUIRE 15 COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS AND APPLICATION MATERIALS (1 ORIGINAL AND 14 COPIES). PLANS AND APPLICATIONS ARE REQUIRED TO BE COLLATED, STAPLED AND FOLDED INTO SETS. THE APPLICANT, BY FILING THIS APPLICATION, AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE. FIRE DEPT PRELIMARY SITE PLAN REVIEW FEE: $200 APPLICATION FEE: $1,205 PROPERTY OWNER (PER DEED): George R. Alexander MAILING ADDRESS: 203 N. Glenwood Ave. Clearwater, FL PHONE NUMBER: 727.666.1806 EMAIL: georgeralexander@gmail.com AGENT OR REPRESENTATIVE: Ellis Curry, Architect MAILING ADDRESS: 1880 Magnolia Dr. Clearwater, FL 33764 PHONE NUMBER: 813.598.1901 EMAIL: cuellcu@aol.com ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: 203 N. Glenwood Ave. Clearwater, FL PARCEL NUMBER(S): 11-29-15-31194-000-0640 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 64 Glenwood according to the plot thereof as recorded in plot book 8, page 14 PROPOSED USE(S): Existing Interior Attached Dwellings DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: This is an existing residential building that had previously been developed and operated with Specifically identify the request 'attached dwelling' units prior to purchase by (include al/ requested code flexibility; the current owner who believed he could continue using the property this way. e.g., reduction in required number of parking spaces, height, setbacks, lot Because it had previously been developed and used with these interior attached dwelling units, size, lot width, specific use, etc.): there are no additional deviations required (beyond those that previously existed prior to acquisition by the current owner). Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 1 of 8 Revised 01/12 LL o Planning & Development Department oPp rwater Flexible Development Application .� P Data Sheet PLEASE ENSURE THAT THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS FILLED OUT, IN ITS ENTIRETY. FAILURE TO COMPLETE THIS FORM WILL RESULT IN YOUR APPLICATION BEING FOUND INCOMPLETE AND POSSIBLY DEFERRED UNTIL THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION CYCLE. ZONING DISTRICT: LMDR FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATION: Residential Urban EXISTING USE (currently existing on site): Existing Interior Attached Dwellings PROPOSED USE (new use, if any; plus existing, if to remain): Existing Interior Attached Dwellings SITE AREA: -le, 44 sq. ft. 0.3729 acres -CA/2" <it- O l qo0 7 o GROSS FLOOR AREA (total square footage of all buildings): Existing: 3866.18 sq, ft. ,;-�y'c&� 1.2-4 i4- isk Proposed: exist. to remain sq. ft.l L Cc t e_ Maximum Allowable: NA sq. ft. r,� - cel \ lA �� 2��•�� GROSS FLOOR AREA (total square footage devoted to each use, if there will be multiple uses): C,>, 3 +'1 First use: NA sq. ft. L Second use: NA sq. ft. Third use: NA sq. ft. FLOOR AREA RATIO (total square footage of all buildings divided by the total square footage of entire site): Existing: NA Proposed: NA Maximum Allowable: NA BUILDING COVERAGE/FOOTPRINT (15` floor square footage of all buildings): Existing: 1859.79 sq, ft. ( 11.45 % of site) Proposed: no change sq. ft. ( % of site) Maximum Permitted: 6497.6 sq. ft. ( .40 % of site) GREEN SPACE WITHIN VEHICULAR USE AREA (green space within the parking lot and interior of site; not perimeter buffer): Existing: NA sq. ft. ( % of site) Proposed: NA sq. ft. ( % of site) VEHICULAR USE AREA (parking spaces, drive aisles, loading area): Existing: 2370.48 sq. ft. ( 14.59 % of site) Proposed: no change sq. ft. ( % of site) Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 2 of 8 Revised 01112 rpt IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RATIO (total square footage of impervious areas divided by the total square footage of entire site): Existing: .3475 South: Proposed: no change LMDR Maximum Permitted: .65 DENSITY (units, rooms or beds per acre): BUILDING HEIGHT: Existing: 3 units total Existing: 18 feet Proposed: no change Proposed: no change Maximum Permitted: 3 units Maximum Permitted: 30 OFF-STREET PARKING: Existing: 6 Proposed: no change Minimum Required: 2 per unit WHAT IS THE ESTIMATED TOTAL VALUE OF THE PROJECT UPON COMPLETION? $ 195,167 ZONING DISTRICTS FOR ALL ADJACENT PROPERTY: North: LMDR South: LMDR East: LMDR West: LMDR STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS`7 ' ",\ I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all Sworn to and subscribed before me this cq day of representations made in this application are true and `) CA c�� to me and/or by accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the L l S who is personally known has property described in this application. producedTLDLti C�E),2-21(0 —(o(- --(Ot — o. as identification. Signature of prope9ty owner or representati Notary public, My commission expires: Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 3 of 8 Revised 01/12 SONILA NASELLARI Notary Public, State of Florida Commission# EE 183792 My comm. expires Mar. 27, 2016 Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 3 of 8 Revised 01/12 LL o Planning & Development Department }earwater Flexible Development Application Site Plan Submittal Package Check list IN ADDITION TO THE COMPLETED FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT (FLD) APPLICATION, ALL FLD APPLICATIONS SHALL INCLUDE A SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL PACKAGE THAT INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION AND/OR PLANS: 0Responses to the flexibility criteria for the specific use(s) being requested as set forth in the Zoning District(s) in which the subject property is located. The attached Flexible Development Application Flexibility Criteria sheet shall be used to provide these responses. Responses to the General Applicability criteria set forth in Section 3-914.A. The attached Flexible Development Application General Applicability Criteria sheet shall be used to provide these responses. (A9A signed and sealed survey of the property prepared by a registered land surveyor including the location of the property, dimensions, acreage, location of all current structures/improvements, location of all public and private easements including official records book and page numbers and street right(s)-of-way within and adjacent to the site. NXIIf the application would result in the removal or relocation of mobile home owners residing in a mobile home park as 11�� provided in F.S. § 723.083, the application must provide that information required by Section 4-202.A.5. ® If this application is being submitted for the purpose of a boatlift, catwalk, davit, dock, marina, pier, seawall or other similar marine structure, then the application must provide detailed plans and specifications prepared by a Florida professional engineer, bearing the seal and signature of the engineer, except signed and sealed plans shall not be required for the repair or replacement of decking, stringers, railing, lower landings, tie piles, or the patching or reinforcing of existing piling on private and commercial docks. 950 A site plan prepared by a professional architect, engineer or landscape architect drawn to a minimum scale of one inch equals feet on a sheet size not to exceed 24 inches by 36 inches that includes the following information: Index sheet of the same size shall be included with individual sheet numbers referenced thereon. North arrow, scale, location map and date prepared. (v�Identification of the boundaries of phases, if development is proposed to be constructed in phases. Location of the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL), whether the property is located within a Special Flood Hazard Area, and the Base Flood Elevation (BFE) of the property, as applicable. Location, footprint and size of all existing and proposed buildings and structures on the site. RLocation and dimensions of vehicular and pedestrian circulation systems, both on-site and off-site, with proposed points oof access. c R��Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks, curbs, water lines, sanitary sewer lines, storm drains, fire hydrants and .nJ seawalls and any proposed utility easements. Location of onsite and offsite stormwater management facilities as well as a narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including calculations. Additional data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual may be required at time of building construction permit. Location of solid waste collection facilities, required screening and provisions for accessibility for collection. 4,® Location of off-street loading area, if required by Section 3-1406. �,�, [ All adjacent right(s)-of-way, with indication of centerline and width, paved width, existing median cuts and intersections "^�Vly-�'t'I and bus shelters. J� Dimensions of existing and proposed lot lines, streets, drives, building lines, setbacks, structural overhangs and building i,�`�-I separations. Building or structure elevation drawings that depict the proposed building height and building materials. Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 4 of 8 Revised 01/12 dTypical floor plans, including floor plans for each floor of any parking garage. HE Demolition plan. WEIdentification and description of watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, specimen trees, and other environmentally sensitive areas. NeIf a deviation from the parking standards is requested that is greater than 50% (excluding those standards where the 1—J difference between the top and bottom of the range is one parking space), then a parking demand study will need to be provided. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved. Please see the adopted Parking Demand Study Guidelines for further information. SA tree survey showing the location, DBH and species of all existing trees with a DBH of four inches or more, and identifying �"""L"�Ithose trees proposed to be removed, if any. RN�,! n� A tree inventory, prepared by a certified arborist, of all trees four inches DBH or more that reflects the size, canopy, and condition of such trees may be required if deemed applicable by staff. Check with staff. p� A Traffic Impact Study shall be required for all proposed developments if the total generated net new trips meet one or more NV of the following conditions: • Proposal is expected to generate 100 or more new trips in any given hour (directional trips, inbound or outbound on the abutting streets) and/or 1,000 or more new trips per day; or ■ Anticipated new trip generation degrades the level of service as adopted in the City's Comprehensive Plan to unacceptable levels; or ■ The study area contains a segment of roadway and/or intersection with five reportable accidents within a prior twelve month period, or the segment and/or intersection exists on the City's annual list of most hazardous locations, provided by the City of Clearwater Police Department; or ■ The Traffic Operations Manager or their designee deems it necessary to require such assessment in the plan review process. Examples include developments that are expected to negatively impact a constrained roadway or developments with unknown trip generation and/or other unknown factors. 14landscape plan shall be provided for any project where there is a new use or a change of use; or an existing use is improved r remodeled in a value of 25% or more of the valuation of the principal structure as reflected on the property appraiser's current records, or if an amendment is required to an existing approved site plan; or a parking lot requires additional landscaping pursuant to the provisions of Article 3, Division 14. The landscape plan shall include the following information, if not otherwise required in conjunction with the application for development approval: Location, size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names. 7Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and location, including drip line. Interior landscape areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressed both in square feet, exclusive of perimeter landscaped strips, and as a percentage of the paved area coverage of the parking lot and vehicular use areas. Location of existing and proposed structures and improvements, including but not limited to sidewalks, walls, fences, pools, patios, dumpster pads, pad mounted transformers, fire hydrants, overhead obstructions, curbs, water lines, sanitary sewer lines, storm drains, seawalls, utility easements, treatment of all ground surfaces, and any other features that may influence the proposed landscape. 17-7XI-ocation of parking areas and other vehicular use areas, including parking spaces, circulation aisles, interior landscape islands and curbing. Drainage and retention areas, including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations. Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscaped buffers including sight triangles, if any. Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 5 of 8 Revised 01112 I o Planning & Development Department , v prwater Flexible Development Application General Applicability Criteria PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO EACH OF THE SIX (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA EXPLAINING HOW, IN DETAIL, THE CRITERION IS BEING COMPLIED WITH PER THIS DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL. 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. This is an existing residential building originally built in 1940 with existing attached dwellings that were added in 1948. As such - for more than 60 years- it has been in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of the adjacent properties. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. As this existing residential building was already being used with interior 'attached dwelling' units it will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development or use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof; in fact nothing will have changed and everything will be as it always has been. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. Because this existing residential building was already being used with interior 'attached dwelling' units it will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. Because this existing residential building was already built and being used with interior 'attached dwelling' units it will have no effect on traffic. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. For more than 60 years this existing residential building has been in this neighborhood with interior attached dwellings; it is already part of the neighborhood fabric and is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. This is an existing residential building originally designed in 1940 with existing attached dwellings that were designed in 1948. Because it has been there more than 60 years it will have no adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. The owner is only requesting to continue the use of the existing 'attached dwelling' units. Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 6 of 8 Revised 01/12 Clearwater Planning & Development Department Flexible Development Application Flexibilitv Criteria PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO THE APPLICABLE FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR THE SPECIFIC USE(S) BEING REQUESTED AS SET FORTH IN THE ZONING DISTRICT(S) IN WHICH THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED. EXPLAIN HOW, IN DETAIL, EACH CRITERION IS BEING COMPLIED WITH PER THIS DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL (USE SEPARATE SHEETS AS NECESSARY). 1. This is an existing residential building that had previously been developed and operated with 'attached dwelling' units within it prior to purchase by the current owner who believed he could continue using it this way and would like to continue using the property this way. Because it had previously been developed and used with these interior attached dwelling units, there are no additional deviations required (beyond those that previously existed prior to acquisition by the current owner). Z Because this existing residential building was already being used with interior `attached dwelling' units it will not materially reduce the fair market value of the abutting properties. In fact nothing will have changed and everything will be as it always has been. 3 The owner is only requesting to continue the use of the existing interior 'attached dwelling' units. Because the existing interior `attached dwelling' units within this existing residential building are residential, they are otherwise permitted in the district. 4 The owner is only requesting to continue the use of the existing interior `attached dwelling' units. Because the existing interior `attached dwelling' units within this existing residential building are residential, they are compatible with the adjacent land uses. 5. Because the existing residential building had previously been developed and used with these interior `attached dwelling' units nothing will change within the immediate vicinity and everything will remain upgraded as it always has been. 6. Because this existing residential building had previously been designed with these interior attached dwelling units it had already created a residential form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate neighborhood and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 7. The owner is only requesting to continue the use of the existing `attached dwelling' units and continue to benefit the community character, of the immediate neighborhood and the City of Clearwater as a whole. No flexibility In regard to lot width, required setbacks, height, off-street parking, access or other development standards are being requested by the owner for this. 8. Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562.4865 Page 7 of 8 Revised 01112 Clearwater Planning & Development Department Flexible Development Application Affidavit to Authorize Agent/Representative 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed -PRINT full names: G -Ea RGE g o q;,> Ry ?c � 2. That 0 am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property: 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for (describe request): 4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: 'p— L__.L c S mac, 9 6 / as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. That (I/we), the u rsi ed authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS BEFORE ME THE UNDERSIGNED, AN OFFICER DULY COMMISSIONED BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, ON THIS �i ` DAY OF 14 Q r �O t _� PERSONALLY APPEARED (a e -a r �'- e . o�o \n -a :-A Al ' Q `XC�`-e 1'- WHO HAVING BEEN FIRST DULY SWORN "Y "'*"s ALVARO C STRAUB Notary Public - State of Florida N, 'o,-? My Comm. Expires Jun 3, 2018 Commission # FF 128705 Notary Sea[/Stamp THAT HE ]SHE SIGNED. 'v — Notary Public Signature J My Commission Expires: Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-662.4567; Fax: 727-562.4866 Page 8 of 8 Revised 01/12 JOB N! LIBER: 2015069 FOR THE BENEFIT OF. GEORGE ALEXANDER SECTION 11, TOWN: 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST PINELLA-, COUNTY, FLORIDA STREET ADDRESS.• 203 N. GLENWOOD A VENUE CLEARWA TSR, FL 33755 I LEGAL DESCRIPTION: I ABBREV1A77ON LEGEND: OT 64, BLOCK GLENWOOD SUBDIVISION, ICCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, S RECORDED IN PLA T BOOK 8, PAGE 14, IF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS -OUNTY, FLORIDA. I SURVEYORS NOTES: 1. ALL CORNERS FOUND HAVE NO NUMBER DESIGNATING THE PREVIOUS SURVEYOR OR COMPANY EXCEPT AS SHOWN. 2. ALL BEARINGS AND DISTANCES ARE MEASURED PER PLAT AND/OR DEED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. J. NO UNDERGROUND ENCROACHMENTS, FOUNDAT70NS OR UTILITIES HAVE BEEN LOCATED OR SHOWN UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 4. NO INSTRUMENTS OF RECORD REFLECTING EASEMENTS, RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND/OR OWNERSHIP HAVE BEEN FURNISHED EXCEPT AS SHOWN HEREON. 5. BASIS OF BEARINGS. SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF ROSEWOOD STREET, BEING N. 6922'50" E. PER PRIOR SURVEY (NO BEARINGS ON PLAT). 6. ACCORDING TO THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP NUMBER 12103CO 109H, (COMMUNITY NUMBER 125096, PANEL 0109, SUFF7X H) MAP REVISED DATE 9/3/2003, AND THE BUILDING SHOWN HEREON IS IN FLOOD ZONE X. 7. THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF PERVIOUS SURVEY PERFORMED BY AMERICAN SURVEYING AND MAPPING DA7FD 3/4/02. (S) REFLECTS THIS DATA F.I.R. = FOUND IRON ROD (SIZE INDICA IED) SEC. — SEC77ON S.I.R. = SET IRON ROD 1/2" LB7895 EMME" TWP. = TOWNSHIP F.I.P. = FOUND IRON PIPE (SIZE INDICATED) RGE. = RANGE F.P.P. = FOUND IRON PIPE PINCHED (SIZE INDICATED) (D) = DEED F.N.D. = FOUND NAIL & DISK (P) = PLAT S.N.D. = SET NAIL do DISK LB7895 EMME" (M) = MEASURED F.C.M. FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT (C) = CALCULATED P.R.M. = PERMANENT REFERENCE MONUMENT (F) = FIELD P.C.P. = PERMANENT CONTROL POINT (R) = RADIAL P.I. = POINT OF W7ERSEC710N P.B. = PLAT BOOK P.C. = POINT OF CURVE PG. = PAGE P.O.B. = POINT OF BEGINNING CONC. =CONCRETE R/W = RIGHT—OF—WAY C/C = COVERED CONC. TYP. TYPICAL ASPH. = ASPHALT S/W = SIDEWALK PWT. = PAVEMENT O.R. = OFFICIAL RECORDS ESMT. = EASEMENT P.S.M. PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR do MAPPER ELEV. = ELEVATION '--Q, DENOTES U77LITY POLE A/C = AIR COND17IONER WM DEN07ES WATER METER E/P = EDGE OF PAVEMENT COR. = CORNER H DENOTES POOL HEATER = CEN7FRLINE P DENOTES POOL PUMP DENOTES DRAINAGE MANHOLE -- OHw DENOTES OVERHEAD WIRE(S) DEN07ES LIGHT POLE ° ° DENOTES 6' WOOD FENCE IICBI DEN07ES IRRIGA71ON CONTROL BOX ° DENOTES 6' VTNLY FENCE FV DENOTES VERIZON UPUTY VAULT (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) ®(2 DENOTES CABLE BOX(S) SURVEYORS CER71F7CA710N. I CER77FIED AS A BOUNDARY SURVEY UNLESS IT BEARS THE SIGNATURE AND THE ELECTRONIC OR ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER, THIS DRAWING SKETCH, PLAT OR MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND IS .NOT VALID. THE SEAL APPEARING ON THIS DOCUMENT WAS AUTHORIZED BY ELIZABETH KATHLEEN MERTA ON MARCH 24, 2015. ELIZABETH KATHLEEN MERTA, P.S.M. ,e13 LAST DATE OF FIELD WORK. 03/24/2015 FIELD BOOK 1501, PG. 63 T—EMME Land Surveying, LLC. u .I . Page 1 of 2 1054 KAPP DRIVE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33765 &09%6� � SURVEY NOT COMPLETE F ---IF= OFFICE (727) 474-3751, FAX (727) 474-3753 j�/Z}/®UT PAGE 2 CER77RCA7E OF' AU77HORIZA770N LB NO. 7895 ema#. emmelandsurmyOgmaJl.comSEE PAGE 2 FAR ANAP AF SURVEY webslte: www.ammelandsurwytng.com 40B, NUMBER: 2015069 FOR THE BENEFI T OF.- GEORGE ALEXANDER SEC7701V 11, TOWNS? 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST PINELLAS LZUNTY, FLORIDA cl Radlus - 331.54(S) - Arc - 124.36(C) - Chord Bearing - N.6972'50'E. (M) O D Chord 12163'(M) 009 P) �05R Pmt. � 26 ASPM. i e, F.C.M. / a 3"x 3„ CONC. WALL, N_ CONC. DRIVE w F.I.R. 112" OAK 4 51.0'O O 47.6'a . 0 17.6 0.7' ON w Op 2 STORY .� p BRICK 21.0' 17.6 ..� LOT 65 wM 3' RESIDENCE o WOOD CONC. #203 WALK "+ DECK 41 WW�vv e� OAK 33' 10.7' ; 4 O c Da 3 d td TAIRS N a O 2.0' N O o Q ' 38.3' 12.7' Q 3 N LOT 64 Na° 38.4' 28.8' OAK 47" N S �' Cave W 0°DECK . 9.5 x 7.5' OAK 37" 8" VINYL SHED r ^ 2 CONC. WITH COVERED N v n WALL MA O AREA ND 1tici 12",13",15 15",15' 0.6' 24 lo S.90'00'00-W(M) 116'(P) 116.25(M) DREW STREET 50' ASPH. PVMT. T- EMME Land Smrveyins, LLC_ ■ �. ■ 1054 KAPP DRIVE, CLEARWA7ER, FLORIDA 33765 . 'r � OFTME (727) 474-3751, FAX (727) 474-3753 Q9TI n� CER 7/FICA7E OF A U THORIZA 77ON LB NO. 7895 �Te; " I 11. 1 ema11: e�rm&fandsurwyOgrv�f.carr LyJa webslt& www.dmme%►daurveying.com to 30 0 15 30 SCALE. 1 " = 30' Page 2 of 2 SURVEY NOT COMPLETE WITHOUT PAGE 1 Sa PAGE i FOR LEGAL DE=IP7701V, LEGEND & N07ES NOR THELEVA TION (ROSE WOCD) WEST ELEVA TION (GLENWOOD) 203N GLENWOOD A VENUE CL, ARWA TER, FL ORIDA 33765 Page 5 of 7 EXISTING BUILDING ELEVA TIONS SOUTHELEVA TION EAST ELEVA TION Page 6 of 7 203N. GLENLf�00DA VENUE Page BUILDING CL, ARWA TER, FL ORIDA 33765 ELEVA TIONS 203N. GLENWOOD A VENUE CL, EAR TSR, FLORIDA 33765 Page 4 of 7 PARKING PLAN AND EXISTING LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 20 0 10 20 / �e d a d e o •A N a SCALE.. 1 = 20' A. d" d . d .e e e .d. 00f)° O0 Y d' R j �O e. / >e l ade ,•. .a • d . ed IA'. a. d d F 61 F— 51 I I I I LI V/NG BED KITCHEN I I � �°e• GARAGE F— —1 e I I q 0 a I I I I GARAGE LQ KITCHEN BED o000 V LlV/NG BED I 8 ' a I . e .da 203N. GLENWOOD A VENUE CL, EAR TSR, FLORIDA 33765 Page 4 of 7 PARKING PLAN AND EXISTING LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN e o •A a e •a A. 203N. GLENWOOD A VENUE CL, EAR TSR, FLORIDA 33765 Page 4 of 7 PARKING PLAN AND EXISTING LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN k , 20 0 10 20 N SCALE. • 1" = 20' e A EX/ST OAK 40" d e e •' a .. a b d e EXIST CORN PLANT e. da : e e a � d. o' Y a CATHEDRAL LIVE OAK o°° CONFEDERATE ✓ASM/NE e 5' OC f0'HTx2.5"CALIPER Oe° 1 GALLON AT 24 -OC (19) bC°p° b00 000 O d ' DOO •Q 000 00 Q 000 00°0° EXIST OAK 33" ooog �:.. LAMP 0000°ooa13 oo °d 000000 a o 0 0 ° d' 00000 c3 FLAG a a .o a A EXIST BLUE PALM -• — SIMPSON STOPPER 36" OC 24 HTx24 SPD 3 GAL :•� EXIST OAK 37" EXIST HEDGE -in CREEPING FIG — 3 GALLON, J6 -OC (29) EX/ST OAK 47" e v .. • °' . . d e .14 e e a ° d EXIST MANGO 12",13",15",15,15" °'ad a. a °• : e. �e 203N. GLLNWOODA HEMS CLEAR WATFR, FLORIDA 33765 Page 7 of 7 LANDSCAPING PLAN Sm a a� ee • ' ° .e .. ••d •4e 4 e a . n ° e SIMPSog'STOPPER ,e 6"• OG,24*"HTx24.' SP9.3 • GAL : (72)a • ° . Q d e' e d .. e e4 ad d ° e• 'd.�• EX/ST OAK 40" d e e •' a .. a b d e EXIST CORN PLANT e. da : e e a � d. o' Y a CATHEDRAL LIVE OAK o°° CONFEDERATE ✓ASM/NE e 5' OC f0'HTx2.5"CALIPER Oe° 1 GALLON AT 24 -OC (19) bC°p° b00 000 O d ' DOO •Q 000 00 Q 000 00°0° EXIST OAK 33" ooog �:.. LAMP 0000°ooa13 oo °d 000000 a o 0 0 ° d' 00000 c3 FLAG a a .o a A EXIST BLUE PALM -• — SIMPSON STOPPER 36" OC 24 HTx24 SPD 3 GAL :•� EXIST OAK 37" EXIST HEDGE -in CREEPING FIG — 3 GALLON, J6 -OC (29) EX/ST OAK 47" e v .. • °' . . d e .14 e e a ° d EXIST MANGO 12",13",15",15,15" °'ad a. a °• : e. �e 203N. GLLNWOODA HEMS CLEAR WATFR, FLORIDA 33765 Page 7 of 7 LANDSCAPING PLAN Sm w SSP Q 9 2015 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPT CITY OF CLEAR WATER FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR 203 N. GLENWOOD AVENUE UE CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33765 INDEX PAGE PAGE NAME FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION 1 SURVEY 2 SURVEY 3 SITEPLAN EXISTING UPPER LEVEL 4 SITEPLAN EXISTING LOWER LEVEL 5 EXISTING BUILDING ELEVA'T'IONS 6 EXISTING BUILDING ELEVATIONS 7 LANDSCAPING PLAN 203N. GLF_NWOOD A flNUE CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33765 INDEX IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RATIO (total square footage of impervious areas divided by the total square footage of entire site): Existing: Proposed: Maximum Permitted: .3475 no change .65 DENSITY (units, rooms or beds per acre): Existing: 258 ,p ►, p$ Proposed: 2.. `% D Maximum Permitted: 2. // �-aUa- � �.._�,5 / �BUILDING HEIGHT: . 501 II Existing: OFF-STREET PARKING: Proposed: Existing: 6 Maximum Permitted: Proposed: no change Minimum Required: 2 per unit 18 feet no change 30 WHAT IS THE ESTIMATED TOTAL VALUE OF THE PROJECT UPON COMPLETION? $195,167 ZONING DISTRICTS FOR ALL ADJACENT PROPERTY: North: LMDR South: LMDR East: LMDR West: LMDR STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS q)� 1, the undersigned, acknowledge that all Sworn_to1a�nd subscribed before me this � day of representations made in this application are true and to me and/or by accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize —�-- City representatives to visit and photograph the (S GOY Nr _, who is personally known has property described in this application. pr duced D_ �(�C -1.(16 I q01 0as identification. V, — — Signature of property owner or repre tative Notary public, �v My commission expires: `fir (301 Gr. KLODJA A YMCA 1 Notary Public, State of Florida Commission # EE 222493 My comm. expires Aug. 5, 2016 Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727.562.4567; Fax: 727-562.4865 Page 3 of 6 Revised 0111112 o Planning & Development Department r C earwater . �., , � , Flexible Development Application 0 Site Plan Submittal Package Check list IN ADDITION TO THE COMPLETED FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT (FLD) APPLICATION, ALL FLD APPLICATIONS SHALL INCLUDE A SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL PACKAGE THAT INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION AND/OR PLANS: © Responses to the flexibility criteria for the specific use(s) being requested as set forth in the Zoning District(s) in which the subject property is located. The attached Flexible Development Application Flexibility Criteria sheet shall be used to provide these responses. Responses to the General Applicability criteria set forth in Section 3-914.A. The attached Flexible Development Application General Applicability Criteria sheet shall be used to provide these responses. A signed and sealed survey of the property prepared by a registered land surveyor including the location of the property, ]A)� dimensions, acreage, location of all current structures/improvements, location of all public and private easements including official records book and page numbers and street rights) -of -way within and adjacent to the site. fL=.J If the application would result in the removal or relocation of mobile home owners residing in a mobile home park as RE provided in F.S. § 723.083, the application must provide that information required by Section 4-202.A.5. til If this application is being submitted for the purpose of a b6atlift, catwalk, davit, dock, marina, pier, seawall or other similar marine structure, then the application must provide detailed plans and specifications prepared by a Florida professional engineer, bearing the seal and signature of the engineer, except signed and sealed plans shall not be required for the repair or replacement of decking, stringers, railing, lower landings, fie piles, or the patching or reinforcing of existing piling on private and commercial docks. 9A site plan prepared by a professional architect, engineer or landscape architect drawn to a minimum scale of one inch equals 50 feet on a sheet size not to exceed 24 inches by 36 inches that includes the following information: ®Index sheet of the same size shall be included with Individual sheet numbers referenced thereon. 12North arrow, scale, location map and date prepared. 41Identifiicatlon of the boundaries of phases, if development is proposed to be constructed in phases. Location of the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL), whether the property is located within a Special Flood Hazard Area, and the Base Flood Elevation (BFE) of the property, as applicable. Location, footprint and size of all existing and proposed buildings and structures on the site. Location and dimensions of vehicular and pedestrian circulation systems, both on-site and off-site, with proposed points of access. (Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks, curbs, water lines, sanitary sewer lines, storm drains, fire hydrants and seawalls and any proposed utility easements. �+ Location of onsite and offsite stormwater management facilities as well as a narrative describing the proposed t tormwater control plan including calculations. Additional data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual may be required at time of building construction permit. PiLocation of solid waste collection facilities, required screening and provisions for accessibility for collection. Nn Location of off-street loading area, if required by Section 3-1406. �� '� All adjacent rights) -of -way, with indication of centerline and width, paved width, existing median cuts and intersections r and bus shelters. Dimensions of existing and proposed lot lines, streets, drives, building lines, setbacks, structural overhangs and building separations. Building or structure elevation drawings that depict the proposed building height and building materials. Planning & Development Department,100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33766, Tel: 727-662-4567; Fax: 727.5624865 Page 4 of 8 Revised 01112 21Typical floor plans, including floor plans for each floor of any parking garage. HE] j Demolition plan. NIdentification and description of watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, specimen trees, and other environmentally sensitive areas. NE If a deviation from the parking standards is requested that is greater than 50% (excluding those standards where the ��---difference between the top and bottom of the range is one parking space), then a parking demand study will need to be provided. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved. Please see the adopted Parking Demand Study Guidelines for further information. A tree survey showing the location, DBH and species of all existing trees with a DBH of four inches or more, and identifying those trees proposed to be removed, if any. k� nA tree inventory, prepared by a certified arborist, of all trees four inches DBH or more that reflects the size, canopy, and t`4t�1 condition of such trees may be required if deemed applicable by staff. Check with staff. 1 p n A Traffic Impact Study shall be required for all proposed developments if the total generated net new trips meet one or more {�J of the following conditions: ■ Proposal is expected to generate 100 or more new trips in any given hour (directional trips, inbound or outbound on the abutting streets) and/or 1,000 or more new trips per day; or ■ Anticipated new trip generation degrades the level of service as adopted in the City's Comprehensive Pian to unacceptable levels; or ■ The study area contains a segment of roadway and/or intersection with five reportable accidents within a prior twelve month period, or the segment and/or intersection exists on the City's annual list of most hazardous locations, provided by the City of Clearwater Police Department; or • The Traffic Operations Manager or their designee deems it necessary to require such assessment in the plan review process. Examples include developments that are expected to negatively impact a constrained roadway or developments with unknown trip generation and/or other unknown factors. �or A landscape plan shall be provided for any project where there is a new use or a change of use; or an existing use is improved LL remodeled in a value of 25% or more of the valuation of the principal structure as reflected on the property appraiser's current records, or if an amendment is required to an existing approved site plan; or a parking lot requires additional landscaping pursuant to the provisions of Article 3, Division 14. The landscape plan shall Include the following information, if not otherwise required in conjunction with the application for development approval: Location, size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names. ©Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and location, including drip line. ®Interior landscape areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and Interior landscape coverage, expressed both in square feet, exclusive of perimeter landscaped strips, and as a percentage of the paved area coverage of the parking lot and vehicular use areas. ZLocation of existing and proposed structures and improvements, including but not limited to sidewalks, walls, fences, pools, patios, dumpster pads, pad mounted transformers, fire hydrants, overhead obstructions, curbs, water lines, sanitary sewer lines, storm drains, seawalls, utility easements, treatment of all ground surfaces, and any other features that may influence the proposed landscape. Location of parking areas and other vehicular use areas, including parking spaces, circulation aisles, interior landscape islands and curbing. Drainage and retention areas, including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations. Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscaped buffers including sight triangles, if any. Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562.4865 Page 5 of 8 Revised 011112 W 0 Planning & Development Department r 1�a aterFlexible Develo ment A lication P PP General Applicability Criteria PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO EACH OF THE SIX (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA EXPLAINING HOW, IN DETAIL, THE CRITERION IS BEING COMPLIED WITH PER THIS DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL. 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. This is an existing residence originally built in 1940 with existing interior attached non -family single occupant living facilities that were added in 1948. As such - for more than 60 years- it has been in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of the adjacent properties. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. As this existing residence was already being used with interior attached non -family single occupant living facilities it will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development or use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof; in fact nothing will have changed and everything will be as it always has been. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood oft a proposed use. Because this existing residence was already being used with interior attached non -family single occupant living facilities, it will not not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or orking in the neighborhood of the proposed use. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. Because this existing residence was already built and being used with interior attached non -family single occupant living facilities it will have no effect on traffic. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. For more than 60 years this existing residence has been in this neighborhood with interior attached non -family single occupant living facilities; it is already part of the neighborhood fabric an J is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of OPE ration impacts, on adjacent properties. This is an existing residence originally designed in 1940 with existing attached non -family single occupant living facilities that were designed In 1948. Because it has been there more than 60 years it will have no adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 6 of 8 Revised 01112 I�� o %(�� Planning & Development Department Flexible Development Application Flexibility Criteria PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO THE APPLICABLE FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR THE SPECIFIC USE(S) BEING REQUESTED AS SET FORTH IN THE ZONING DISTRICT(S) IN WHICH THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED. EXPLAIN HOW, IN DETAIL, EACH CRITERION IS BEING COMPLIED WITH PER THIS DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL (USE SEPARATE SHEETS AS NECESSARY). 1. This is an existing residential building that had previously been developed and operated with interior. attached non- (qr t � family single occupant living facilities within it prior to purchase by the current owner who believed he could continue I `"I� using it this way and would like to continue using the property this way. Because it had previously been developed �/ �� /,r and used with these interior attached non -family single occupant facilities, there are no additional deviations required b �5 f beyond those that previously existed prior to acquisition by the current owner. The intention of the Community Development Code is to allow flexibility in the development standards to recognize these opportunities. The continued use of the existing parcel is otherwise impractical without these existing deviations and the requested flexibility is justified and is consistent with the City's Community Development Code. 2. Because this existing residential building was already being used with interior attached non -family single occupant living facilities it will not materially reduce the fair market value of the abutting properties. In fact nothing will have changed and everything will be as it always has been. Alternatively, not allowing the requested units would devalue the property and thus reduce the fair market value of the property and the surrounding properties. 3. Because the existing interior attached living facilities within this existing residential building are residential, they are otherwise permitted in the district. 4. Because the existing interior attached living facilities within this existing residential building are residential, they are compatible with the adjacent land uses. 5. Because the existing residential building had previously been developed and used with interior attached living facilities nothing will change within the immediate vicinity and everything will remain upgraded as it always has been. 6. Because this existing residential building had previously been designed with attached living facilities it had already created a residential form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate neighborhood and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 7. The owner is only requesting to continue the use that already benefits the community character, of the immediate neighborhood and the City of Clearwater as a whole. No flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height, off-street parking, access or other development standards are being requested by the owner for this beyond those that previously existed prior to acquisition by the current owner. The intention of the Community Development Code is to allow flexibility in the development standards to recognize these opportunities. The continued use of the existing parcel is otherwise impractical without these existing deviations and the requested flexibility is justified and is consistent with the City's Community Development Code. Planning & Development Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tei: 727-56211567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 7 of 8 Revised 01112 LL a R ualft & Development Deparbnent Yen at Flexible Development Application r P P� Affidavit to Authorizent Ke resentative 1. ProWde names of all property owners on deed — PRINT full names: 2. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property: Ta S N. Ct r—M WLoQ-ts PwE . 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for (describe request): 4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: Lt S. --Lk9i as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act an the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatfves in order to process this application acid the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. that (I w , the u ed authartty, ereby certify that the foregoing Is true and correct. Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner STATS OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PtNiOA AS Property Owner BEFORE ML THE UNDERSIGNED, AN OFFICER DULY COMMISSIONED BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, ON 'PHIS. ` i?AY OP r I � t � ,PERSONALLY APPEARED ¢. ,r Ca. ,� � .`T fr•t t 8 �cS.n .e P" WHO HAVING BEEN FIRST D,IULY SWORN UNDERAN FIDAVIT THAT HtrlSilE SIGNED. ALVARO C 6TRAUB r "' Notary Public - State of Flwide my Comm. Explru dun S. 2016 Commlaeb8 0 FF 126706 Notary SeaUSWM Notary Public Signature My Commission Expires; Phoning & 0eve"weat Mpartmont,100 S. Myrtle AVanae. C14an"Mr. PL 33764, TO. m- 727 Page 8 of 8 RDVIW; 81M2 �r�I s�P o s zos5�D V. 0 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPT Planning & Development Department F �amater I RWATE ex ble Development Application _ -�. P PP 0 Attached Dwellings, Mixed -Uses or Non -Residential Uses IT IS INCUMBENT UPON THE APPLICANT TO SUBMIT COMPLETE AND CORRECT INFORMATION. ANY MISLEADING, DECEPTIVE, INCOMPLETE OR INCORRECT INFORMATION MAY INVALIDATE YOUR APPLICATION. ALL APPLICATIONS ARE TO BE FILLED OUT COMPLETELY AND CORRECTLY, AND SUBMITTED IN PERSON (NO FAX OR DELIVERIES) TO THE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY NOON ON THE SCHEDULED DEADLINE DATE. A TOTAL OF 11 COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS AND APPLICATION MATERIALS (1 ORIGINAL AND 10 COPIES) AS REQUIRED WITHIN ARE TO BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW BY THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE. SUBSEQUENT SUBMITTAL FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD WILL REQUIRE 15 COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS AND APPLICATION MATERIALS (1 ORIGINAL AND 14 COPIES). PLANS AND APPLICATIONS ARE REQUIRED TO BE COLLATED, STAPLED AND FOLDED INTO SETS. THE APPLICANT, BY FILING THIS APPLICATION, AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE. FIRE DEPT PRELIMARY SITE PLAN REVIEW FEE: $200 APPLICATION FEE: $1,205 PROPERTY OWNER (PER DEED): George R. Alexander MAILING ADDRESS: 203 N. Glenwood Ave. Clearwater, FL PHONE NUMBER: 727.666.1806 EMAIL: georgeralexander@gmail.com AGENT OR REPRESENTATIVE: Ellis Curry, Architect MAILING ADDRESS: 1880 Magnolia Dr. Clearwater, FL 33764 PHONE NUMBER: 813.598.1901 EMAIL: cuelicu@aol.com ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: 203 N. Glenwood Ave. Clearwater, FL PARCEL NUMBER(S): 11-29-15-31194-000-0640 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 64 Glenwood according to the plot thereof as recorded in plot book 8, page 14 PROPOSED USE(S): Residence with existing interior attached non -family single occupant living facilities DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: This is an existing residence that had previously been developed and operated with Specifically identify the request interior attached non -family single occupant living facilities within it prior to purchase by the current owner (include all requested code flexibility; e.g., reduction in required number of parking spaces, height, setbacks, lot size, lot width, specific use, etc.): who believed he could continue using the property this way. Because it had previously been developed and used with these interior attached non -family single occupant living facilities there are no additional deviations required (beyond those that previously existed prior to acquisition by the current owner). Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 1 of 8 Revised 01112 o Planning & Development Department }C 1arwater�Flexible Development Application Data Sheet PLEASE ENSURE THAT THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION iS FILLED OUT, IN ITS ENTIRETY. FAILURE TO COMPLETE THIS FORM WILL RESULT IN YOUR APPLICATION BEING FOUND INCOMPLETE AND POSSIBLY DEFERRED UNTIL THE FOLLOWING APPUCA71ON CYCLE. ZONING DISTRICT: LMDR FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATION: Residential Urban EXISTING USE (currently existing on site): Existing Interior Attached Dwellings PROPOSED USE (new use, if any; plus existing, if to remain): Existing Interior Attached Dwellings SITE AREA: 7 �"� J • + sq. ft. D • :311 acres GROSS FLOOR AREA (total square footage of all buildings); Existing: 3866.18 sq. ft. Proposed: exist. to remain sq, ft, Maximum Allowable: NA sq. ft. GROSS FLOOR AREA (total square footage devoted to each use, if there will be multiple uses): First use: NA sq. ft. Second use: NA sq. ft. Third use: NA sq, ft. FLOOR AREA RATIO (total square footage of all buildings divided by the total square footage of entire site): Existing: NA Proposed: NA Maximum Allowable: NA BUILDING COVERAGE/FOOTPRINT (15` floor square footage of all buildings): Existing: 1859.79 sq, ft. ( 11.45 % of site) Proposed: no change sq. ft. ( % of site) Maximum Permitted: 6497.6 sq. ft. ( .40 % of site) GREEN SPACE WITHIN VEHICULAR USE AREA (green space within the parking lot and interior of site; not perimeter buffer): Existing: NA sq. ft. ( % of site) Proposed: NA sq. ft. ( % of site) VEHICULAR USE AREA (parking spaces, drive aisles, loading area): Existing: 2370.48 sq. ft. ( 14.59 % of site) Proposed: no change sq. ft. ( % of site) Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 2 of 8 Revised 01112 TOB NUMBER: 2015069 FOR THE BENEFI T OF. GEORGE ALEXANDER SECTM tl, 7V*PSH V SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST PINEL' AS LtVNTY, FLORIDA STT?EET ADERES 20, N. S7LENWOOD A MWE CLEARWATER FL J.7,755 I LEGAL DESCRIPnON. I ABBREWA77ON LEGEND: I OT 64, BLOCK GLENWOOD SUBDI MIL N, CCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEEREOF, S RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 8, PACE 14, IF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PIN'ELLI S OUNTY, FLORIDA. SURVEYORS NOTES: 1. ALL CORNERS FOUND HAVE NO NUMBER OESIC14A77NG THE PREVIOUS SURVEYOR OR COMPANY EXCEPT A5 SHOWN. 2. ALL BEARINGS AND DISTANCES ARE MEASURE: PER PLAT AND/OR DEED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. J. NO UNDERGROUND ENCROACHMENTS, FCUIVDA 79NS OR U77LI77ES HAVE BEEN LOCATED OR SHOWN UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 4. NO INSTRUMENTS OF RECORD REFLECTING EA�=MENTS� RIGHTS—OF—WAY AND/OR OWNERSHIP HAVE SEEN FURNISHED EXCEPT AS SHOWN HEREON. 5. BASIS OF BEARINGS. SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LIVE OF ROSEWOOD STREET, BEING N. 69 22'50" E. PER FfIOR SURVEY (NO BEARINGS ON PLAT). 6. ACCORDING TO 77 -IE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY NA77ONAL FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP NUMBER 12103CO109H, (COMMUNITY NUMBER 125096, PANEL 0109, SUFFIX H) MAP REVISED DA 7F 9/3,'3003, AND THE BUILDING SHOWN HEREON IS IN FLOOD BONE X. Z THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED WITH THE BENEfa r OF PERVIOUS SURVEY PERFORMED BY AMERICAN SUP'-FWNG AND MAPPING DATED 3/4/02. (S) REFLECTS 7H/. DATA FI.R. - FCJND Ind RO.) (SZE INDICA 71 D) .SLR - _ET IROJ ?OD 1/2' L87895 "DIME' F.LP. = FC -IND rr-N PIF_' (SZE (NDICAT D) FP.P. - rC/NO q --N PIFE PNCHED (SZZ INDICATED) F P. - i LUNO .J.L1 & -)ISK SN.ig. _ ?ET NAI. k D(S{ L57895 E'MMC' F.C.M. _ i'( -IND ',.'VCRET M7NUNENT P.R.d. - r ESRMAIF 4 T REFERENCE MONIMr'NT P_C.,' = PERMAAF,T COMTRC: POINT P.I. _ '(NNT U IN'7ER`ZC70A' P. C. _ ,'VYNT LF CURD P.O. 3. _ 'a/N r LF BECIMINC. RA = ?r,H r- Or- WAY TYP. = rT2ICAL SIN = 0EWAL4 C.R. = AT7CIA, df -CORDS P.S A. _ 'eOFES ►+NAL ?URV EYDR 6• M.-PPER '-Q � DEV )TES JrL/TY 'OLE Q DEV -)TES M TER METE? C DEV -)TES sXL HiATE7 C DEV -)TES 3 --OL PM'MP SEC. - SEC77ON TW. = TOWNSHIP RGE. - RANGE (D) = DEED (P) = PLAT (M) = MEASURED C) CAL (F) FIELDULATED (R) = RADIAL P.B. - PLAT BOOK PC. - PAGE CONC. -CONCRETE C/C = COVERED CONC ASPH. - ASPHALT PWT. - PAVEMENT ESMT. - EASEMENT ELEV. - ELEVA7100V A/C - AIR CONDITIONER E/P = EDGE OF PAVEMENT COR. = CORNER (� CEN7ERLINE C) i D0nTES 7�ANACE MINHOLE OHW DENOTES OVERHEAD N1RE(S) 0 D0nTES 1J T PILE - DENOTES 6' WOOD FENCE PE DtV)TES 'TWIGA7T)N C-Oh7ROL BO( —0-0'- DENOTES 6' VINLY FENCE Ewl D&nTES V3?)ZOA U77J7- VAULT (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) E (4 D6z*nTES r BLE 004 ) I SLRVEYORS CERTIFICATION: CEA TTF/E✓ AS 30 JN[ ARY SUPVEY UNLESS /r BEI,?S A -IE S/GNATi7?E AND THE ELECTRONIC OR ORIe'NAL RATS© SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER THI�- DRA {SING, SKETC 1 PLAT OR MAY IS FOR INFL)I?M,i 770N�,L PUPPL75ES ONL ✓ AND IS NOT VALID. THE SEAL APPEAffPIG CP% THIS DOCUMENT WAS AtITHORIZED BY ELIZABETH KA;VLEEIV MEF -TA CN P4ARCH 24, 2015. EL.ZABET4 KAT -LEES MERTA, P.Sot LAST D.1 rE Oi ,7ELD WORK: 03/24, F7ELD BOOK 15.1. PG. 63 13 [AE] .EMM.E Lcxnd Sbe-rveLLC, U � U Page 1 of 2 1054 KAPP DRIV, C.LS4WATER, FLORIVA .'+.5a. SURVEY NOT COMPLETE E'7 (727) 474-3751, FAX (7: 7) 78 5 R M UT PAGE 2 Fi li[--qtaER71FlCA OF Al/THQrrZATIAN LB NO NO 78y5 small: emmeland&.Isvw>Ogmall.c" SEE PAGE 2 FAR ANAP OF SURVEY webalta www. ernm:eandwr�s*g.=m JOB NUMBER: 2015069 FOR THE BENEFIT OF. GEORGE ALEXANDER SECTION 11, TOWNSh 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST PINELLAS v'OUNTY, FLORIDA 01 Radlus — 331.54(S) Arc — 124.36(C) f���T Chord Bearing - N.6972'50'E.(M) p �, Chord — 123.63'(M)OC�P) �,pS P�"? '� 26gSPH. G wl W �a q�za Q S 901?0'00"W.(M) 116'(P) 116.25(M) DREW STREET 50' ASPH. PVMT. EMME Land Surveying, LLC_ IN Mk L 11111 CLEARWAI FLORIDA 33765 OFFICE (727) 474-3751. FAX (727) 474-3753 CER AFlCAIE OF AUIHORIZA77ON LB NO. 7895 evna#. emmsfandeurve)ftmalcom • websit& www. amm&londsurvv*gx0m LOT 65 20 0 10 20 / N SCALE. 1" = 20'�" -�(�o09 'O I e I � a I I FAmxY it n II r-\ Q BED BA TH BED II T BED 203N. GLEMOODA CINUE CLEAR WA7FR, FLORIDA 33765 4• 4. 'da. Page 3 of 7 SITE PLAN AND EXISTING UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 20 0 10 20 / N T YY e e . e •°. SCALE." 1" = 2� d e / 100 60 e e '�O e a i e.d e'4 � o.. � °e .. .e• 2 d, m :.a I FOUR FOOT UTILITY . a• EASEMENT I e 4 a e d e e e e . • b •. 4' d. e. a 203 GLEN WOOD A I/E/V Page 4 of 7 UE PARKING PLAN AND CLEARWA TER, FLORIDA 33765 LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN e a e pe .d KIT�HENI BED I I I i WNG I I I I l—J L—--je aAn� GARAG �a F I I I I O L J THE BUILDING SHALL MEET THE O e GARAGE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE e. 5TH EDITION W STOR. I y (� e WORK STOR. SHOP I da I a �n I FOUR FOOT UTILITY . a• EASEMENT I e 4 a e d e e e e . • b •. 4' d. e. a 203 GLEN WOOD A I/E/V Page 4 of 7 UE PARKING PLAN AND CLEARWA TER, FLORIDA 33765 LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN NORTHELEM TION (ROS U DOD) LA •�'ti 1111111/1 s 203N vLENT1VOOD A VENUE CLEARGI A TEP,, RL.ORIDA 33765 Page q o -f 7 E.XI) TJdG BL'lLDhVG ELM TIONS SOUTHELEVA TION' EAST ELEVA TION Page 6 of 203N. GLENt��U 00DAG b�' ExisTNG 8L1~-IrNG OLFARWA TFfr FL 6RIDA 33765 20 0 10 20 a, a A d N d . e d . SCALE. • 1 " = 20''e tl a .a e a •. a. A o .e< .d a. d . ..� . e e �] d d tl e tl S/MPS0, % STOPPER d� B" OG 24 "H jx24.SPC3.3 GAL ; (72)a d d• •p''e d d d d a e e d 4 .tl . e 'd A d' • d ° EXIST OAK 40" tl 4' . tl. ° :e d tl A e EXIST CORN PLA T d " 0,.• ' a. 4 .. e e e .d ° a e a CATHEDRAL LIVE OAK CONFEDERATE JASM/NE a 5' OC 10'HTx2.5"CAL/PER o00 "OC (19) i0 PT 5`D�1,{c "' 1 GALLON AT 24 000 00,4.' 000 e 000 00 4 000 00°0° 000 EXIST OAK 33" o0000o e' ❑ 0000000000 000000 d LAMP 00 a ..0a° d � o°a 0000 a d 0000° :•' ❑ FLAG °000° CREEPING FIG — d. EXIST BLUE PALM 3 GALLON, 3670C (29) a b 'a a SIMPSON STOPPER 36' OC 24 HTx24 SPD d 3 GAL EX/ST OAK 47" e e e tl • e V .. EXIST OAK 37" d d .e C tl A d EX/ST HEDGE CRO TON ' EX/ST MANGO 12,13",15",15",15" tl e d. d ° dtl. M O d.. .. Page 7 of 7 203N. GLENWOOD A V NUE LANDSCAPING PLAN CL, ARWA TER, FLORIDA 33765 D AUG 0 32015 PLANNING 8 DE VEL DMENT DEPT F CLEARWATER CITY OF CLEAR WA TER FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICA TION FOR 203 N. GLENWOOD AVENUE CLEAR WATER, FLORIDA 33765 Fal a,Y INDEX PAGE PAGE NAME FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION 1 SURVEY 2 SURVEY 3 SITEPLAN EXISTING UPPER LEVEL 4 SITEPLAN EXISTING LOWER LEVEL 5 EXISTING BUILDING ELEVATIONS 6 EXISTING BUILDING ELEVATIONS 7 LANDSCAPING PLAN 203 N. GLENWOOD A V,ENUF CLEARWA TER, FLORIDA 33765 INDEX APlanning & Development Department 11'e- arwat�r Flexible Development Application Attached Dwellings, Mixed -Uses or Non -Residential Uses IT IS INCUMBENT UPON THE APPLICANT TO SUBMIT COMPLETE AND CORRECT INFORMATION. ANY MISLEADING, DECEPTIVE, INCOMPLETE OR INCORRECT INFORMATION MAY INVALIDATE YOUR APPLICATION. ALL APPLICATIONS ARE TO BE FILLED OUT COMPLETELY AND CORRECTLY, AND SUBMITTED IN PERSON (NO FAX OR DELIVERIES) TO THE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY NOON ON THE SCHEDULED DEADLINE DATE. A TOTAL OF 11 COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS AND APPLICATION MATERIALS (1 ORIGINAL AND 10 COPIES) AS REQUIRED WITHIN ARE TO BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW BY THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE. SUBSEQUENT SUBMITTAL FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD WILL REQUIRE 15 COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS AND APPLICATION MATERIALS (1 ORIGINAL AND 14 COPIES). PLANS AND APPLICATIONS ARE REQUIRED TO BE COLLATED, STAPLED AND FOLDED INTO SETS. THE APPLICANT, BY FILING THIS APPLICATION, AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE. FIRE DEPT PRELIMARY SITE PLAN REVIEW FEE: $200 APPLICATION FEE: $1,205 PROPERTY OWNER (PER DEED): George R. Alexander MAILING ADDRESS: 203 N. Glenwood Ave. Clearwater, FL PHONE NUMBER: 727.666.1806 EMAIL: georgeralexander@gmail.com AGENT OR REPRESENTATIVE: Ellis Curry, Architect MAILING ADDRESS: 1880 Magnolia Dr. Clearwater, FL 33764 PHONE NUMBER: 813.598.1901 EMAIL: cuellcu@aol.com ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: 203 N. Glenwood Ave. Clearwater, FL PARCEL NUMBER(S): 11-29-15-31194-000-0640 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 64 Glenwood according to the plot thereof as recorded in plot book 8, page 14 PROPOSED USE(S): Existing Interior Attached Dwellings DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: This is an existing residential building that had previously been developed and operated with Specifically identify the request 'attached dwelling' units prior to purchase by (include all requested code flexibility, the current owner who believed he could continue using the property this way. e.g., reduction in required number of parking spaces, height setbacks, lot Because it had previously been developed and used with these interior attached dwelling units, size, lot width, specific use, etc.): there are no additional deviations required (beyond those that previously existed prior to acquisition by the current owner). Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-5624567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 1 of 8 Revised 01112 0 �` Planning & Development Department LL � > c 'arwater ��Flexible Development Application Data Sheet PLEASE ENSURE THAT THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS FILLED OUT, IN ITS ENTIRETY. FAILURE TO COMPLETE THIS FORM WILL RESULT IN YOUR APPLICATION BEING FOUND INCOMPLETE AND POSSIBLY DEFERRED UNTIL THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION CYCLE. ZONING DISTRICT: LMDR FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATION: Residential Urban EXISTING USE (currently existing on site): Existing Interior Attached Dwellings PROPOSED USE (new use, If any; plus existing, if to remain); Existing Interior Attached Dwellings SITE AREA: 16,244 sq, ft. 0.3729 acres GROSS FLOOR AREA (total square footage of all buildings): Existing: 3866.18 sq. ft. Proposed: exist, to remain sq, ft. Maximum Allowable: NA sq. ft. GROSS FLOOR AREA (total square footage devoted to each use, If there will be multiple uses); First use: NA sq. ft, Second use: NA sq. ft. Third use: NA sq. ft. FLOOR AREA RATIO (total square footage of all buildings divided by the total square footage of entire site): Existing: NA Proposed: NA Maximum Allowable: NA BUILDING COVERAGE/FOOTPRINT (iso floor square footage of all buildings): Existing: 1859.79 sq. ft. ( 11.45 % of site) Proposed: no change sq. ft. ( % of site) Maximum Permitted: 6497.6 sq. ft. ( .40 % of site) GREEN SPACE WITHIN VEHICULAR USE AREA (green space within the parking lot and Interior of site; not perimeter buffer): Existing: NA sq. ft. ( % of site) Proposed: NA sq. ft. ( % of site) VEHICULAR USE AREA (parking spaces, drive aisles, loading area): Existing: 2370.48 sq. ft. ( 14.59 % of site) Proposed: no change sq. ft. ( % of site) Planning & Development Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562.4865 Page 2 of 8 Revised 011112 IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RATIO (total square footage of impervious areas divided by the total square footage of entire site): Existing: .3475 Proposed: no change Maximum Permitted: .65 DENSITY (units, rooms or beds per acre): Existing: 3 units total Proposed: no change Maximum Permitted: 3 units OFF-STREET PARKING: Existing: 6 Proposed: no change Minimum Required: 2 per unit BUILDING HEIGHT: Existing: Proposed: Maximum Permitted: 18 feet no change 30 WHAT IS THE ESTIMATED TOTAL VALUE OF THE PROJECT UPON COMPLETION? $ 195,167 ZONING DISTRICTS FOR ALL ADJACENT PROPERTY: North: LMDR South: LMDR East: LMDR West: LMDR STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINELLAS A I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all Sworn to and subscribed before me this c2 / day of representations made .in this application are true and(b to me and/or by accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize oqD City representatives to visit and photograph the n l S Gt,�-(A who is personally known has property described in ithis. application.produced 5MO D 16 6' (A000 as identification. �it �_ &S� i A. Signature of property owner or repres t five Notary public, ./ My commission expires: vim. `t- AM��+ SONILA NASELLARI ,q Notary Public, State of Florida Commission# EE 183792 My comm. expires Mar. 27, 2016 Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 3 of 8 Revised 01112 U. of `Planning & Development Department } cullwater - - - Flexible Development Application Site Plan Submittal Package Check list IN ADDITION TO THE COMPLETED FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT (FLD) APPLICATION, ALL FLD APPLICATIONS SHALL INCLUDE A SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL PACKAGE THAT INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION AND/OR PLANS: ®'Responses to the flexibility criteria for the specific use(s) being requested as set forth in the Zoning District(s) in which the subject property is located. The attached Flexible Development Application Flexibility Criteria sheet shall be used to provide these responses. j Responses to the General Applicability criteria set forth in Section 3-914.A. The attached Flexible Development Application General Applicability Criteria sheet shall be used to provide these responses. A signed and sealed survey of the property prepared by a registered land surveyor including the location of the property, dimensions, acreage, location of all current structures/improvements, location of all public and private easements including official records book and page numbers and street rights) -of -way within and adjacent to the site. Lt(� If the application would result in the removal or relocation of mobile home owners residing in a mobile home park as ����1LJ.I provided in F.S. § 723.083, the application must provide that information required by Section 4-202.A.5. iW o If this application is being submitted for the purpose of a boatlift, catwalk, davit, dock, marina, pier, seawall or other similar marine structure, then the application must provide detailed plans and specifications prepared by a Florida professional engineer, bearing the seal and signature of the engineer, except signed and sealed plans shall not be required for the repair or replacement of decking, stringers, railing, lower landings, fie piles, or the patching or reinforcing of existing piling on private and commercial docks. 1�A site plan prepared by a professional architect, engineer or landscape architect drawn to a minimum scale of one inch equals 50 feet on a sheet size not to exceed 24 inches by 36 inches that includes the following information: ©Index sheet of the same size shall be included with individual sheet numbers referenced thereon. [North arrow, scale, location map and date prepared. n Identification of the boundaries of phases, if development is proposed to be constructed in phases. Location of the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL), whether the property is located within a Special Flood Hazard Area, and the Base Flood Elevation (BFE) of the property, as applicable. Location, footprint and size of all existing and proposed buildings and structures on the site. [tocation and dimensions of vehicular and pedestrian circulation systems, both on-site and off-site, with proposed points of access. R("'(Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks, curbs, water lines, sanitary sewer lines, storm drains, fire hydrants and jseawalls and any proposed utility easements. 11771 Location of onsite and offsite stormwater management facilities as well as a narrative describing the proposed ! �stormwater control pian including calculations. Additional data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual may be required at time of building construction permit. Location of solid waste collection facilities, required screening and provisions for accessibility for collection. Nn Location of off-street loading area, if required by Section 3-1406. All adjacent right(s)-of-way, with indication of centerline and width, paved width, existing median cuts and intersections r and bus shelters. Dimensions of existing and proposed lot lines, streets, drives, building lines, setbacks, structural overhangs and building separations. Building or structure elevation drawings that depict the proposed building height and building materials. Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727.562.4567; Fax: 727-562.4865 Page 4 of 8 Revised 01112 21Typical floor plans, including floor plans for each floor of any parking garage. IY(,p,,, )Demolition plan. NE4 Identification and description of watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, specimen trees, and other environmentally sensitive areas. tqnif a deviation from the parking standards is requested that is greater than 50% (excluding those standards where the �1 aldifference between the top and bottom of the range is one parking space), then a parking demand study will need to be provided. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved. Please see the adopted Parking Demand Study Guidelines for further information. A tree survey showing the location, DBH and species of all existing trees with a DBH of four inches or more, and identifying those trees proposed to be removed, if any. A tree inventory, prepared by a certified arborist, of all trees four inches DBH or more that reflects the size, canopy, and condition of such trees may be required if deemed applicable by staff. Check with staff. tp r j A Traffic Impact Study shall be required for all proposed developments if the total generated net new trips meet one or more of the following conditions: • Proposal Is expected to generate 100 or more new trips in any given hour (directional trips, inbound or outbound on the abutting streets) and/or 1,000 or more new trips per day; or ■ Anticipated new trip generation degrades the level of service as adopted in the City's Comprehensive Plan to unacceptable levels; or • The study area contains a segment of roadway and/or intersection with five reportable accidents within a prior twelve month period, or the segment and/or intersection exists on the City's annual list of most hazardous locations, provided by the City of Clearwater Potice Department; or ■ The Traffic Operations Manager or their designee deems it necessary to require such assessment in the plan review process. Examples include developments that are expected to negatively impact a constrained roadway or developments with unknown trip generation and/or other unknown factors. ( A landscape plan shall be provided for any project where there is a new use or a change of use; or an existing use is improved t=1 or remodeled in a value of 25% or more of the valuation of the principal structure as reflected on the property appraiser's current records, or if an amendment is required to an existing approved site plan; or a parking lot requires additional landscaping pursuant to the provisions of Article 3, Division 14. The landscape plan shall include the following information, if not otherwise required in conjunction with the application for development approval: ILocation, size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names. Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and location, including drip line. Interior landscape areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressed both in square feet, exclusive of perimeter landscaped strips, and as a percentage of the paved area coverage of the parking lot and vehicular use areas. 10Location of existing and proposed structures and improvements, including but not limited to sidewalks, walls, fences, pools, patios, dumpster pads, pad mounted transformers, fire hydrants, overhead obstructions, curbs, water lines, sanitary sewer lines, storm drains, seawalls, utility easements, treatment of all ground surfaces, and any other features that may influence the proposed landscape. Z Location of parking areas and other vehicular use areas, including parking spaces, circulation aisles, interior landscape islands and curbing. Drainage and retention areas, including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations. ©11 Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscaped buffers including sight triangles, if any. Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562.4865 Page 5 of 8 Revised 01112 o Planning & Development Department earwater � Flexible Development Application General Applicability Criteria PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO EACH OF THE SIX (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA EXPLAINING HOW, IN DETAIL, THE CRITERION IS BEING COMPLIED WITH PER THIS DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL. 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. This is an existing residential building originally built in 1940 with existing attached dwellings that were added in 1948. As such - for more than 60 years- it has been in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of the adjacent properties. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. As this existing residential building was already being used with interior 'attached dwelling' units it will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development or use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof; in fact nothing will have changed and everything will be as it always has been. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. Because this existing residential building was already being used with interior 'attached dwelling' units it will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. Because this existing residential building was already built and being used with interior 'attached dwelling' units it will have no effect on traffic. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. For more than 60 years this existing residential building has been in this neighborhood with interior attached dwellings; it is already part of the neighborhood fabric and is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. This is an existing residential building originally designed in 1940 with existing attached dwellings that were designed in 1948. Because it has been there more than 60 years it will have no adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. The owner is only requesting to continue the use of the existing 'attached dwelling' units. Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562.4865 Page 6 of 8 Revised 01112 o Planning & Development Department }rClearwater FI 1 D 1 1' n �. Flexible Development Application Flexibility Criteria PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO THE APPLICABLE FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR THE SPECIFIC USE(S) BEING REQUESTED AS SET FORTH IN THE ZONING DISTRICT(S) IN WHICH THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED. EXPLAIN HOW, IN DETAIL, EACH CRITERION IS BEING COMPLIED WITH PER THIS DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL (USE SEPARATE SHEETS AS NECESSARY). 1. This is an existing residential building that had previously been developed and operated with 'attached dwelling' units within it prior to purchase by the current owner who believed he could continue using it this way and would like to continue using the property this way. Because it had previously been developed and used with these interior attached dwelling units, there are no additional deviations required beyond those that previously existed prior to acquisition by the current owner. Table 2-204. "LMDR" District Flexible Development, Residential Infill Projects note (2) states: The development standards for residential infill projects are guidelines and may be varied based on the criteria specified in Section 2- 204(E). Then Section 2-204(E) (7) states: Flexibility is regard to.lot width, required setbacks, height, off street parking, access, OR OTHER DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. Furthermore Table 2-204. "LMDR" District Flexible Development shows that there is NO MINIMUM Lot Size for Residential Infill Projects. However the Planning Review is taking a density based on acres (7.5 dwelling units per acre) and translating it to be literally the same based on any fractional unit thereof. The Planning Review is saying that 7.5 dwelling units per acre means that 5,808 square feet are required per dwelling unit. This is a misapplication that becomes increasingly distorted when applied to smaller lots which is why there is no minimum lot size for residential infill projects in Table 2-204. "LMDR" District Flexible Development. The intention of the Community Development Code as noted above is to allow flexibility in the development standards to recognize these opportunities. The continued use of the existing parcel is otherwise impractical without these existing deviations and the requested flexibility is justified. To further illustrate, Table 2-204. "LMDR" District Flexible Development shows the minimum lot size for an "Attached Dwelling" is 10,000 sf, but by the Planning Review interpretation a 10,000 sf lot could never be developed because it would still always be less than 2 dwelling units; 10,000 divided by 2 is only 5000 which according to the Planning Review interpretation is not enough. How can that be? What would be the point of having a minimum lot size of 10,000 sf when the minimum development would be 2 units or 1 dwelling unit per 5,000 sf. According to the planning review our lot size is 15,214 sf. which at 1 dwelling unit per 5000 sf would allow 3 dwelling units. Similarly, the definition of Dwelling unit (Section 8-102. — Definitions) means a building or portion of a building providing independent living facilities for one FAMILY including provision for living, sleeping, and COMPLETE kitchen facilities. Our existing residential building has 2 existing 1 bedroom efficiencies that are designed for a single occupant such as a retiree; not an entire family. Likewise, although we have provided 2 parking spaces per unit, they would not realistically ever be expected to require this amount of parking. Here again, the intention of the Community Development Code as noted above is to allow flexibility in the development standards to recognize these opportunities. The continued use of the existing parcel is otherwise impractical without these existing deviations and the requested flexibility is justified and is consistent with the City's Community Development Code. Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562.4865 Page 7 of 8 Revised 01112 2. Because this existing residential building was already being used with interior 'attached dwelling' units it will not materially reduce the fair market value of the abutting properties. In fact nothing will have changed and everything will be as it always has been. Alternatively, not allowing the requested existing 1 bedroom units would render them virtually useless and thus reduce the fair market value of the property and the surrounding properties. 3. The owner is only requesting to continue the use of the existing interior 'attached dwelling' units. Because the existing interior 'attached dwelling' units within this existing residential building are residential, they are otherwise permitted in the district. 4. The owner is only requesting to continue the use of the existing interior 'attached dwelling' units. Because the existing interior 'attached dwelling' units within this existing residential building are residential, they are compatible with the adjacent land uses. 5. Because the existing residential building had previously been developed and used with these interior 'attached dwelling' units nothing will change within the immediate vicinity and everything will remain upgraded as it always has been. 6. Because this existing residential building had previously been designed with these interior attached dwelling units it had already created a residential form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate neighborhood and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 7. The owner is only requesting to continue the use of the existing 'attached dwelling' units and continue to benefit the community character, of the immediate neighborhood and the City of Clearwater as a whole. No flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height, off-street parking, access or other development standards are being requested by the owner for this beyond those that previously existed prior to acquisition by the current owner. (Also see response number 1) Table 2-204. "LMDR" District Flexible Development, Residential Infill Projects note (2) states: The development standards for residential infill projects are guidelines and may be varied based on the criteria specified in Section 2-204(E). Then Section 2-204(E) (7) states: Flexibility is regard to lot width, required setbacks, height, off street parking, access, OR OTHER DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. Furthermore Table 2-204. "LMDR" District Flexible Development shows that there is NO MINIMUM Lot Size for Residential Infill Projects. However the Planning Review is taking a density based on acres (7.5 dwelling units per acre) and translating it to be literally the same based on any fractional unit thereof. The Planning Review is saying that 7.5 dwelling units per acre means that 5,808 square feet are required per dwelling unit. This is a misapplication that becomes increasingly distorted when applied to smaller lots which is why there is no minimum lot size for residential infill projects in Table 2-204. "LMDR" District Flexible Development. The intention of the Community Development Code as noted above is to allow flexibility in the development standards to recognize these opportunities. The continued use of the existing parcel is otherwise impractical without these existing deviations and the requested flexibility is justified. To further illustrate, Table 2-204. "LMDR" District Flexible Development shows the minimum lot size for an "Attached Dwelling" is 10,000 sf, but by the Planning Review interpretation a 10,000 sf lot could never be developed because it would still always be less than 2 dwelling units; 10,000 divided by 2 is only 5000 which according to the Planning Review interpretation is not enough. How can that be? What would be the point of having a minimum lot size of 10,000 sf when the minimum development would be 2 units or 1 dwelling unit per 5,000 sf. According to the planning review our lot size is 15,214 sf. which at 1 dwelling unit per 5000 sf would allow 3 dwelling units. Similarly, the definition of Dwelling unit (Section 8-102. — Definitions) means a building or portion of a building providing independent living facilities for one FAMILY including provision for living, sleeping, and COMPLETE kitchen facilities. Our existing residential building has 2 existing 1 bedroom efficiencies that are designed for a single occupant such as a retiree; not an entire family. Likewise, although we have provided 2 parking spaces per unit, they would not realistically ever be expected to require this amount of parking. Here again, the intention of the Community Development Code as noted above is to allow flexibility in the development standards to recognize these opportunities. The continued use of the existing parcel is otherwise impractical without these existing deviations and the requested flexibility is justified and is consistent with the City's Community Development Code. LL o Planning & Development Department ,,Clearwater Flexible PP Development Application P Affidavit to Authorize Agent/Representative i 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed -PRINT full names: 2. That (i am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property: 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for (describe request): 4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: '�_lrLt S. G.u,C(R as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. That the u rsi ed/authority�, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS BEFORE ME THE UNDERSIGNED, AN OFFICER DULY COMMISSIONED BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, ON THIS DAY OF� ,_ 1 , PERSONALLY APPEARED C4LQ r`� ,&cns� :.� (f1 l p XC"-,\.(+!' WHO HAVING BEEN FIRST DULY SWORN Y iVW Wt.%l •:�"" ALVARO C STRAUB Notary Public - State of Florida F My Comm. Expires Jun 8.2018 Commission #t FF 128705 Notary Seal/Stamp THAT HFJSHE SIGNED. 'v — Notary Public Signature My Commission Expires: 1) L' n 727 0 -2-,C> t Planning & Development Npartrnent,100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 88766, Telt n7 -N24567; Fax: 727.4624866 Page 8 of 8 Revised 01112 JOB NUMBER: 2015069 AOR THE BENEFIT OF: GEORGE ALEXANDER SEC7701V 11, TO Nk; ' 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA STREET ADDRESS: 203 N. GLENWOOD A VEWE CLEARWA ME FL 33,755 I LEGAL DESCRIP71011. I 4889?EVIA77ON LEGEND. LOT 64, BLOCK GLENWOOD SUBDMSION, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLA T THERECF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 8, 'AGE 14, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PYIELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. I SURVEYORS N07ES: 1. ALL CORNERS FOUND HAVE NO NUMBEF JESIGNATiNG THE PREVIOUS SURVEYOR OR COMPANY EXCEPT AS SHOWN. 2. ALL BEARINGS AND DISTANCES ARE ME4SURED PER PLAT AND/OR DEED UNLESS OTHERWISE NCTED. J. NO UNDERGROUND ENCROACHMENTS, FGUVDATIONS OR UTILITIES HAVE BEEN LOCATED OR SHOWN tI&LESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 4. NO INSTRUMENTS OF RECORD REFLEC77106 EASEMENTS, RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND/OR OWNERSHIP HAVE LEEN FURNISHED EXCEPT AS SHOWN HEREON. 5. BASIS OF BEARINGS: SOUTH RIGHT OF W74 Y LINE OF ROSEWOOD STREET, BEING N. 6922"50" E. PER PRIOR SURVEY (NO BEAR/NGS ON PLAT). 6. ACCORDING TO THE FEDERAL EMERGENC Y MANAGEMENT AGENCY NATIONAL FLOOD MISUFANCE RA IF MAP NUMBER 12103CO109H, (COMMUNITY NL''MBER 125096, PANEL 0109, SUFFIX H) MAP REVISED DATE !/3/2003, AND THE BUILDING SHOWN HEREON IS IN FlO'OD ZONE X. F.I.R. = FOUND IRON ROD (-,IZE' IJDIC47ED) S.LR. = SET IRON RCC 1/2' LEA -95 EMME" F.I.P. = FOUND IRON PIPE (SIZE rVD a mp) F.P.P. = FOUND IRON PIPE PINCHEfl !SIZE INDICATED) F.N.D. = FOUND NAIL do DIST S.N.D. = SET NAIL & DISK L3769. EMME" F.C.M. = FOUND CONCRETE MONVA.ENT P.R.M. = PERMANENT REFERENCE rONUMENT P.C.P. = PERMANENT CONTR X PC -NT P.I. = POINT OF IN cRSE=O1'I P. C. = POINT OF CURVE P.O.B. = POINT OF 86GINNIN: R/W = RIGHT -OF -VP Y TYP. = TYPICAL S/W = SIDEWALK O.R. = OFFICIAL RE(•ORDS P.S.M. = PROFESSION L SUR rEYDF &,NAPPER `-Ch DENOTES U71U„ POLL FW—Ml DENOTES WATER METER H DENOTES POOL HEA7E°? P DENOTES POOL PUMP SEC. = SEC77ON TWP. = TOWNSHIP RGE. - RANGE (D) — DEED (P) — PLAT (M) = MEASURED (C) - CALCULATED (F) - FIELD (R) = RADIAL P.B. PLAT BOOK PG. = PAGE CONC. = CONCRETE C/C = COVERED CONC. ASPH. = ASPHALT PWT. = PAVEMENT ESMT = EASEMENT ELEV. = ELEVATION A/C = AIR CONDITIONER E/P = EDGE OF PAVEMENT COR. CORNER - CENTERLINE D DENOTES DRAII-AGE A$4NF-&E "%v DENOTES OVERHEAD WiRE(S) DENOTES UGH] POLE ° ° DENOTES 6' WOOD FENCE IC DENOTES IRRIGA77ON :ON7?:)L BOX DENOTES 6' NNLY FENCE ❑V DENOTES VER120N UTE-JT) L'AULT (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) ® © DENOTES CARL_ BOX(i) SLRLE YOBS CER77FICA77ON: I CERTIFIED AS A EOUNL4E Y SURVEY UNLESS IT BEARS THE SICK A TURE AND THE ELECTRONIC OR ORIGINAL RAISED -EAL OF 4 FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER, THIS DR. 4 W/NC, S# -ETCH, PLAT OR MAR#tMF,,,,9R., INFORMA TIONAL P 'RPO 3E_' -,O/ IL Y AND IS A AL APPEARING ON TMS DJC(Iti'EIJT WAS A!,/ ��Y TH KATHLEEN MERTA ON NAPLH 24, 201%. _.•;i�iE 11t%`•. i►': Z THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED WITH THE &ENEFIT OF PERVIOUS SURVEY PERFORMED BY AMERICAt t SURVEYINGu.. AND MAPPING DATED 3/4/02. (S) REFLECT; THIS DATA ELIZABETH KATHLEEN P.S.M. 3 ' LAST DA 7E OF FIELD WORK: C.3/24/20 ��,"�"� OF FIELD BOOK 1501, ,'G. 6, , IT: F�UEMME Land Surveying, LLC_ ❑■ �� :� f' s. 1054 KAPP DRIVE, CIEARWA TER, FLORIDA 33765 1' ; � SURVEY I OMPLETE OFFlCE (727) 474-3:51, FAX (727) 474-3753I �l/THOUl" PAGE 2 Fii]F� CERAemok OF AL'T ndsur ADN LB N0. 7895 --� email: emm-ir7moutwyO vv>fn coin ❑ � � � � SEE PAGE 2 FOR MAP OF SURVEY website: www.ar-lmelaldsw-vaying.com JOB NUMBER: 2015069 FOR 'THE BENEFI T OF.- GEORGE ALEXANDER SECTION 11, TOM, ' 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA ci Radlus — 331.54(S) — Arc - 124.36'(C) Chord Becr/ng = N.6972 50 E.(M) OD s, Chord 123 63'(M)V� �� �W (P) R0,5PSA 26' ASPM' . e F. C. M. 3.x3„ 8'' ° CONC. .. w WALL, . 44 a N . w GtMC ' j • a 0Z1 w .° F.I.R. 1/2' OAK 4 C1 1 51.0' 0 47.6'17.6' 0.7' ON w Op 2 STORY cs 3' BRICK 21.0. 17.6' .� LOT 65 w W wM RESIDENCE o WOOD colic. #203 _ "J DECK W WALK OAK 33" TAIRS .N z a Z O v 20' QI �= U ° L7 0Q. 38.3' 0 ca e �v ;n 12.7' b ° 3N LOT 64 .N 38.4' 28.8' OAK 47" N S W o colic. O9.5'x 7.5' Amlk v OAK 37" 8" DECK NNK SHED r ^ 2 CONC. WW COVERED N v Z WALL 0)MA O AREA I N. \� 12",13"15,15"15" B 24 0 \1 OHW ^ ° nnPjn we i v °a S.90'00'00"W.(M) 116'(P) 116.25'(M) DREW STREET 50' ASPH. PVMT. FIE]'MME Land Surveying, LLC. U j.2. L 1054 KAPP DRIVE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33765 OMCE (727) 474-3751, FAX (727) 474-3753 � T ED CER71RCA7F OF AU7NOR/ZAHON LB NO. 7895 emo#. emmelandsurv*^mall.com ❑ website: www.ammelandsurveyfng.com 0.6' 47- — Lz O 0 30 0 15 30 SCALE. 1" = 30' Page 2 of 2 SURVEY NOT COMPLETE W11 THOUT PAGE 1 SEE PAGE 1 FAR LEGAL DESCRIP7IAN, LEGEND & N07ES NOR THELEVA TIC1V (ROS,Wv+9) w ` �f WEFT ELF(A TION,'GLENW-00P) 203A'. GLENWOODD A VEME CLEA, I?WA TEP, FLORIDA 3.76.E Page 5 v,{ i EV 3 TING B�YLD.NG ELEVA TIONS 20 0 10 20 N SCALE. 1 20' �� 009 '05 i�4 DINING KITCHEN LIWNG BA TH BED BED 5 A- - . , - I - 41 - A. .4.4 -e4 A -.4.- . IT BA TH FAMIL Y r\ r\ r\ BED DINING KITCHEN LIWNG BA TH 203N. GLENWOOD A CIENUE CL EAR WA TER, FL ORMA 33 765 Page 3 of 7 SITE PLAN AND EXISTING UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN BED BED 203N. GLENWOOD A CIENUE CL EAR WA TER, FL ORMA 33 765 Page 3 of 7 SITE PLAN AND EXISTING UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 20 010 20 / 203 GLEN WOOD A VENUE CLEAR WA TER, FLORIDA 33765 Page 4 of 7 PARK/NG PLAN AND LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN e , N f / �� e d' d e d SCALE. 1" = 20'° ^� .• .v .Q O•' 4 O, d os d ° { > d• • d a A d' d / d..d e•4 e d 4 O 'd 2 ..a •O e ° O •. O �. r 6 r 5 KI TCHEN/ BED LIVING RA G1 • r- --I Od O d GARAGE K1 TC d STOR. i y ° L116NG BED 203 GLEN WOOD A VENUE CLEAR WA TER, FLORIDA 33765 Page 4 of 7 PARK/NG PLAN AND LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 20 0 10 20 N SCALE. • 1 " = 20' EXIST OAK 40" EXIST CORN PLAY i a :CATHEDRAL LIVE OAK °O o d :-.5' OC 10'HTx2.5"CALIPER o o° 00°0° • : No e< . oco e oo 00 4 000 I o 00 ° ° 0000 000 EXIST OAK 33"o 0°0°00 0°0° ' ❑ 00000°c0000 d° LAMP 0000000 .4 000 gid. 00 o 00 " il• 00000 0000 ' ❑ FLAG 000° ° $ a a e• : EXIST BLUE PALM .a D d a SIMPSON STOPPER 36" OC 24 HTx24 SPD ° 3 GAL e a• .e �e Id a '* d A ° e Q < c .d a •° .e e.. S/MPSQIJ -STOPPER ° e 6:"- OG .24"1YTx24. SA9.3 •GAL :(72),j. d e °, e a •e A' e ° e. CONFEDERATE JASMINE 1 GALLON AT 24 -OC (19) CREEPING FIG — 3 GALLON, 36 -OC (29) � a d .e EXIST OAK 37" •e d •a e e A ° EXIST HEDGE CROTON EXIST MANGO 12" 13",15",15",15" 203N, GLENWOODA VENUE CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33765 EXIST OAK 47" Page 7 of 7 LANDSCAPING PLAN 40 IJ CONSENT AGENDA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD Date: Tuesday, October 20, 2015 Time: 1:00 p.m. Place: 112 South Osceola Street, 3rd Floor, Clearwater, Florida, 33756 (City Hall Council Chambers) Welcome the City of Clearwater Community Development Board (CDB) meeting. The City strongly supports and fully complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Please advise us at least 72 hours prior to the meeting if you require special accommodations. Assisted listening devices are available. An oath will be administered swearing in all participants in public hearing cases. If you wish to speak please wait to be recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons speaking before the CDB shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes. Kindly refrain from conducting private Conversations, using beepers, cellular telephones, etc. as they are distracting during the meeting. Florida Statue 286.0105 states: Any person appealing a decision of this 'Board must have a record of the proceedings to support such appeal. Community Development Code Section 4- 206 requires that any person seeking to: personally testify, present evidence, argument and witness, cross-examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests should request party status during the case discussion. Party status entitles parties to: personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses cross-examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests. If you have questions or concerns about a case, please contact the staff presenter from the Planning and Development Department listed at the end of each agenda item at 727-562-4567.. www.myclearwater.con-/gov/depts/planning Community Development Board Agenda — October 20, 2015 — Page 1 of 3 ii A. CALL TO ORDER, INVOCATION, PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE B. ROLL CALL: Chair Barker, Vice Chair Allbritton, Members Adelson, Anuszkiewicz, Boutzoukas, Funk, Lau, Alternate Member Quattrocki, City Staff C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING: September 15, 2015 D. CITIZENS TO BE HEARD, RE: ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA E. CONSENT AGENDA: The following cases are not contested by the applicant, staff, neighboring property owners, etc. and will be approved by a single vote at the beginning of the meeting (Items 1): 1. Case: FLD2015-08031— 668 Mandalay Avenue Level Two Application Owner: Somerset Vacation Townhomes Applicant: John Pantazes, AIA, Regency Development (2551 Drew Street, Clearwater, FL 33767; phone: (727) 726-6678; email: jpantazes e,icloud.com) Location: 0.40 acres located at the southwest corner of Mandalay Avenue and Somerset Street. \� Request: The Community Development Board is reviewing a proposed 20 -room hotel in the Tourist District for the property located at 668 Mandalay Avenue. The project is 50 feet in height, includes a minimum of 24 parking spaces and requests allowable flexibility from setback and lot area requirements (Section 2-803). Neighborhood Associations: Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition, Clearwater Beach Presenter: Mark T. Parry, AICP, Senior Planner F. LEVEL TWO APPLICATIONS (Items 1- 3): Case: FLD2015-07029— 704 Eldorado Avenue Level Two Application Owner: Lawrence A. Seigel \� Applicant: Gerhrad Boerner (425 Cypress Creek, Oldsmar, FL 34677; phone: (727) 789-2866; email: seacomcorp@gmai l.com) Location: 0.16 acres located on the west side of Eldorado Avenue 79 feet south of the Acacia Street and Eldorado Avenue Intersection. Request: The Community Development Board (CDB) is reviewing two proposed decks for a detached dwelling in the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District for the property located at 704 Eldorado Avenue. The decks are 3.3 feet and 14.5 feet in height (above BFE) and the application requests allowable flexibility from setbacks (Sections 2-204 and 3-905.C). Neighborhood Associations: Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition and Clearwater Beach Association Presenter: Kevin W. Nurnberger, Senior Planner Community Development Board Agenda — October 20, 2015 — Page 2 of 3 2. Case: FLD2015-06024 — 15 Avalon Street Level Two Application Owner: Avalon Land Holdings, LLC Applicant: Brian J. Aungst, Jr., Esquire (625 Court Street, Clearwater, FL 33756; phone: (727) 444- 1403; email: bja@macafar.com) Location: 0.50 acres located on the south side of Avalon Street and the north side of Kendall Street approximately 68 feet west of the Avalon Street and Mandalay Avenue intersection and 213 feet west of the Kendall and Mandalay Avenue intersection. Request: The Community Development Board (CDB) is reviewing a proposed 22 resort attached dwellings in the Tourist (T) District for the property located at 15 Avalon Street. The project is 71.6 feet in height, includes 46 parking spaces, and requests allowable flexibility from setback requirements, and the Design Guidelines of Beach by Design; as well as a Transfer of Development Rights for three dwelling units from 483 Mandalay Avenue (Sections 2-803 and 4-1403). Neighborhood Associations: Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition and Clearwater Beach Association Presenter: Kevin W. Nurnberger, Senior Planner 3. Case: FLD2015-06021— 203 N. Glenwood Avenue Owner: George R. Alexander Applicant: Ellis Currv. Architect (1880 Magnolia Level Two Application Drive, Clearwater, FL 33764; phone: (813) 598- �\L/ 1901; email: cuellcu °,aol.com) VV Location: 0.349 acres located at the northeast corner of Glenwood Avenue with Drew Street. Request: The Community Development Board (CDB) is reviewing the proposed conversion of a si gle-family dwelling into a duplex in the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District for the roperty located at 203 N. Glenwood Avenue. The project is 18 feet in height and includes four parking spaces (Section 2-204). Neighborhood Associations: Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition, Hillcrest Neighborhood Association, Glenwood Neighbors and Skycrest Neighborhood Association. Presenter: Melissa Hauck -Baker, AICP, Senior Planner G. ADJOURNMENT Community Development Board Agenda — October 20, 2015 — Page 3 of 3 Clearwater COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: October 20, 2015 AGENDA ITEM: E.3. CASE: FLD2015-06021 REQUEST: The Community Development Board (CDB) is reviewing the proposed conversion of a single -family dwelling into a duplex in the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District for the property located at 203 N. Glenwood Avenue. The project is 18 feet in height and includes four parking spaces (Section 2-204). GENERAL DATA: Applicant/ Owner............. George R. Alexander Location .......................... 203 N. Glenwood Avenue; northeast corner of Glenwood Avenue and Drew Street Property Size .................... 0.349 acres Future Land Use Plan...... Residential Urban (RU) Zoning .......................... Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District Special Area Plan.............. None Adjacent Zoning.... North: Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District South: Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District East: Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District West: Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District Existing Land Use............. Detached Dwelling Pr-)posed Land Use......... Attached Dwellings (2 units) AERIAL MAP Cleary aler Level II Flexible Development Application Review U ANALYSIS: Location and Existing Conditions: The 0.349 acre site is located along the east side of North Glenwood Avenue at the intersection with Drew Street. The corner lot features 110 feet of lot frontage along Glenwood Avenue and 124 feet of lot frontage along Rosewood Street. According to the Pinellas County Property Appraiser records, the site was developed in 1941 with a single-family dwelling. The City records reflect that the detached dwelling has existed as one unit since its construction. The subject property is located within the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District where the intent is to protect and preserve the integrity and value of existing, stable residential neighborhoods of low to medium density while at the same time, allowing a careful and deliberate redevelopment and revitalization of such neighborhoods in need of revitalization or neighborhoods with unique amenities which create unique opportunities to increase property values and the overall attractiveness of the City. The Future Land Use Plan category is Residential Urban (RU). The purpose of the RU category is to depict those areas of the county that are now developed, or appropriate to be developed, in an urban low density residential manner; and to recognize such areas as primarily well-suited for residential uses that are consistent with the urban qualities and natural resource characteristics of such areas. Tne immediate vicinity is characterized by single-family residential uses and the neighborhood surrounding the :ubiect property is zoned LMDR. ✓ode Compliance Analysis: There are no active Code Compliance cases for the ;vLject property. Development Proposal: Tfz pronosal is to convert the single-family detached ew:.ing to a two -unit attached dwelling. The upper .evel cf Y_1e structure will serve as the first unit with a f: oni door entry off of the Glenwood Avenue side of the PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISr3J JJACARANDA CIR � ^ RIOGEW .T w 3. g Z PINEWOOD ST NJ S W < w o Z PROJECT o ; F-1 S!TE 8 CRESTVIEW ST Z u 0 �D W DREW ST N GROVE ST LOCATION MAP — OAAK220 W�OOppD ST R 3D7 I rT' i8 —_ " 303 2ro 20 - O Q � 217 i 211 O RO4MOOD S 1 _ .V6 Z .. 206 z ro¢ R �` DRE'A'ST j in 124 123 r^~i aiTi 7�,' YD)? 1fa H � tt9 GROVE ST ZONING MAP 308 309 300 308 OAK1":OOD ST 220 307 _ Q 303 -I}p-- 214 215 T.S ' Z i 212 - g 217 Z 2141 215 RO _ _ 206 Ow�sT 20/ 2 Z .•.�. a v a 202. � 203 �fp DREW ST —� i � � h ryN Nhoti9h hh KK 126... 1N 11231 � � ���`�. �. $ fib- f1t j r11I .,111 o. '119tV T A• M $ r% ROVE ST EXISTING SURROUNDING USES MAP Community Development Board — October 20, 2015 FLD2015-06021 - Page 2 Level II Flexible Development Application Review DEVELOPMENT T DEVELOPMENT T REVIEW DIVISI( property, while the second unit will be on the lower level with a front door entry off of the Rosewood Street side. No physical changes are proposed to either the exterior of the existing structure or the existing site layout. The development proposal does, however, include striping the driveway for parking spaces and providing additional landscaping. The application is being processed as a Level Two, Residential Infill Project pursuant CDC Section 2-204.E. The development proposal's compliance with the various development standards of the CDC is discussed below: Special Area Plan: N/A Comprehensive Plan: The proposal is supported by applicable various Goals, Objectives and/or Policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan as follows: Future Land Use Plan Element: Policy A.3.2.1 - All new development or redevelopment of property within the City of Clearwater shall meet all landscape requirements of the Community Development Code. Policy A.5.5.1 Development should be designed to maintain and support the existing or envisioned character of the neighborhood. The subject site is located within the Residential Urban land use area of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map. The proposed project is consistent with the maximum permitted density of 7.5 dwelling units per acre and the maximum impervious surface ratio of 0.65. The proposal includes the creation of a second dwelling unit which is consistent with the existing character of the neighborhood. Additionally, the project includes the incorporation of supplemental landscaping materials which are consistent with the Community Development Code. Therefore, the proposal supports these applicable components of the City's Comprehensive Plan. Community Development Code: The proposal is supported by the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code as follows: Section 1-103.B.2. Ensuring that development and redevelopment will not have a negative impact on the value of surrounding properties and wherever practicable promoting development and redevelopment which will enhance the value of surrounding properties; and, Section 1-103.D. It is the further purpose of this Development Code to make the beautification of the city a matter of the highest priority and to require that existing and future uses and structures in the city are attractive and well-maintained to the maximum extent permitted by law; and, Section 1-103.E.3. It is the further purpose of this Development Code to protect and conserve the value of land throughout the city and the value of buildings and improvements upon the land, and minimize the conflicts among the uses of land and buildings. Community Development Board — October 20, 2015 FLD2015-06021 - Page 3 ment Application Review PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT Level II Flexible Develo p pp DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION The surrounding neighborhood consists of detached dwellings the majority of which are single- family dwellings with a limited number featuring more than one dwelling unit. The existing, code compliant, detached dwelling will be maintained and will thereby contribute to the consistent development pattern of the area. The proposed project includes development of a two unit attached dwelling of the existing detached dwelling. The project will add monetary value to the structure with the proposed improvements and ultimately will help increase the assessed value. The project complies with the required four off-street parking spaces and additional landscaping to screen the parking area. The proposed conversion to a two unit attached dwelling will provide for an increased assessed property value and therefore, the proposal supports the CDC sections. Compliance with Development Standards for Residential Infill Projects: Density: Pursuant to the Comprehensive Plan and CDC Section 2-201.1, within the Residential Urban (RU) future land use plan category, the maximum allowable density is 7.5 units per acre. As the lot area is 15,213.98 square feet (0.349 acres), two dwelling units are permissible. Impervious Surface Ratio (ISR) Pursuant to the Comprehensive Plan and CDC Section 2-201.1, within the RU future land use plan category, the maximum allowable ISR is 0.65. The proposed ISR is 0.35, which is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and this Code provision. Minimum Lot Area: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-204, within the LMDR District there is no minimum lot area for Residential Infill Projects. However, for a point of comparison, the minimum lot area for attached dwellings (Table 2-203) is 10,000 square feet. The subject property has a lot area of 15,213.98 square feet which is consistent with these Code provisions. Minimum Lot Width: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-204, within the LMDR District there is no minimum lot width for Residential Infill Projects. However, for a point of comparison, the minimum lot width for attached dwellings (Table 2-203) is 100 feet. The subject property has lot widths of 110 feet (Glenwood) and 124 feet (Rosewood), both of which are consistent with these Code provisions. Minimum Setbacks: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-204, within the LMDR District Residential Infill Projects may have a front setback between 10 feet and 25 feet and a side setback between zero and five feet. Rear setbacks do not apply to the subject site as it is a corner lot with two front and two side setbacks (Section 3-903.D.). No flexibility needs to be requested for either the front or side setbacks; therefore the development proposal is consistent with these Code provisions. Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent Front (north): 10 - 25 feet 34 feet x Front (west): 10 - 25 feet 38 feet x Side (south): Zero - five feet 11 feet x Side (east): Zero - five feet 17.6 feet x Community Development Board — October 20, 2015 FLD2015-06021 - Page 4 ELOPNENT PLANNING REVLevel II Flexible Development Application Review DEVELOPWNT REVIEW DIVISION ON Maximum Building Height: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-204, within the LMDR District the maximum building height is 30 feet for Residential Infill projects. The height of the existing structure is 18 feet as measured from grade to midpoint of the pitched roof, which is consistent with this Code provision. Minimum Off -Street Parking: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-204, for Residential Infill projects in the LMDR District, two parking spaces per unit are required. The proposal includes two parking spaces within the garage portion of the lower level and two spaces within the driveway area. Therefore, the development proposal is consistent with this Code provision. Solid Waste: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-201.D.1., solid waste containers shall be screened from view from streets and adjacent properties. The attached dwellings will be provided black barrels for solid waste disposal and those barrels will be stored in the garage consistent with this Code provision. Mechanical Equipment: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-903.I.1., air conditioning and similar mechanical equipment is exempt from the side setback requirements, but such equipment must be screened from view from streets and adjacent properties. The existing equipment is located behind the existing structure and the yard is fenced along the entire perimeter, which is consistent with the Code provision. Utilities: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-912, all utility facilities including individual distribution lines shall be installed underground unless such undergrounding is impractical. The subject property complies with this requirement. Compliance with General Applicability Standards: The proposal supports the General Applicability requirements of this Code as follows: Section 3-914.A.1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located; and, Section 3-914.A.2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof; and, Section 3-914.A.3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood; and, Section 3-914.A.4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion; and, Section 3-914.A.5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity; and, Section 3-914.A.6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. Community Development Board — October 20, 2015 FLD2015-06021 - Page 5 Level II Flexible Development Application Review PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT P APP DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION The proposal includes the development of an existing detached dwelling from one living unit to two living units. No exterior physical changes will be made to the structure as one unit will be located on the first floor and utilize the existing front door which faces Glenwood. The second unit will be located on the lower level and will utilize the entry door which is located adjacent to the garage door and faces the Rosewood frontage. The surrounding properties are developed with a variety of different styles of residential structures including detached and attached dwellings. The buildings in the immediate area range from one to two stories with mostly one-story detached dwellings on similarly sized lots as the subject property. And while no particular architectural style is dominant for the dwellings, the existing design does not feature any departures from the varied architectural styles. The proposal will not impair the value of adjacent properties or hinder their redevelopment. Developing the property in this manner will promote positive infill and remove the potential negative effects of a vacant structure. The proposal will likely have a positive effect on the health or safety of persons residing in the neighborhood as the existing design of the dwelling will not be altered through the project. The proposal will and has been designed to have a minimal effect on traffic congestion. Pursuant to Table 2-204 of the CDC, for Residential Infill projects, two parking spaces per unit are required. The proposal includes a garage with area to accommodate two cars and a driveway area for two additional cars. Additionally, the project includes landscaping as a method of screening the view of the parked cars in the driveway. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with the requirements of CDC Section 3-914.A.1-6. Compliance with Specific Use Flexibility Criteria: The proposal supports the specific Residential Infill Project criteria pursuant to CDC Section 2- 204.E.1-7., as follows: 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from one or more of the following: intensity; other development standards. As the subject property is a corner lot, there are 25 foot front setbacks along the north and west property lines. The existing lot layout complies with the required setbacks and contains a 3,628 square foot residential structure which was constructed in 1941. The subject property is 15,213.98 square feet and the required minimum lot size for two units would be 11,616 square feet. The existing lot meets the lot size requirement and the proposed project will result in two units within one structure. The proposed project will maintain consistency with the existing development parameters of the surrounding properties and the overall neighborhood. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. As previously discussed, the proposal includes the development of an existing single-family detached dwelling into a two -unit attached. This conversion is not expected to have a negative impact on the fair market value of abutting properties. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section. Community Development Board — October 20, 2015 FLD2015-06021 - Page 6 Level II Flexible Development lPLANNING &DEVELOPMENT p Application Review DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION 3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the district. In the LMDR District, Residential Infill Projects are listed as Level Two, Flexible Development use and attached dwellings are also permitted in the same fashion. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section. 4. The uses within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses. As previously discussed, the proposal is for the conversion of a single-family detached dwelling into a two -unit attached dwelling in a neighborhood characterized by residential uses such as detached and attached dwellings. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section. S. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. As previously discussed, the proposal is for the conversion of a single-family detached dwelling into a two -unit attached dwelling. While no changes are proposed to the exterior of the existing structure, the site will be upgraded through the provision of new landscaping. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section. 6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. As previously discussed, all surrounding properties are developed with a variety of residential uses including detached and attached dwelling units. The proposed attached dwelling units contained within the existing structure will be compatible with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section. 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height, off-street parking access or other development standards are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. As previously discussed, the existing development complies with the required setbacks and other code requirements, and no changes or flexibility is proposed. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section. Section 4-206.D.4: Burden of proof. The burden of proof is upon the applicant to show by substantial competent evidence that he is entitled to the approval requested. The applicant has adequately demonstrated through the submittal of substantial competent evidence that the request is entitled to the approval requested as required by CDC Section 4- 206.D.4. Community Development Board — October 20, 2015 FLD2015-06021 - Page 7 Level II Flexible Development Application Review PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT � p �p DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meeting of September 3, 2015, and deemed the development proposal to be legally sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB). Findings of Fact: The Planning and Development Department, having reviewed all evidence submitted by the applicant and requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact: 1. That the 0.349 acre site is located at the northeast corner of Glenwood Avenue at Drew Street; 2. That the subject property lot widths are 124 and 110 feet along the north and west property lines, respectively; 3. That the property is currently developed with an existing detached dwelling; 4. That the subject property is located within the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District and the Residential Urban (RU) Future Land Use Plan category; 5. That the proposal is to redevelop the subject property with a two unit attached dwelling; 6. That the proposal includes a front (north) setback of 34 feet (to dwelling) and front (west) setbacks of 38 feet (to dwelling); 7. That no flexibility is being requested to side setbacks, building height or number of off-street parking spaces; and, 8. That there is no active Code Compliance case for the subject property. Conclusions of Law: The Planning and Development Department, having made the above findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the pattern of development of the surrounding neighborhood; 2. That the proposal is consistent with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of the CDC pursuant to CDC Section 1-103; 3. That the proposal is consistent with the intent of the LMDR District and RU FLUP classification; 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards pursuant to CDC Table 2- 201.1; 5. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards pursuant to CDC Table 2- 204; 6. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria pursuant to CDC Section 2-204.E.; 7. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals pursuant to CDC Section 3-914.A.; and, 8. That the application is consistent with the requirement for the submittal of substantial competent evidence pursuant to CDC Section 4-206.D.4. Community Development Board — October 20, 2015 FLD2015-06021 - Page 8 Level II Flexible Development Application Review PLANNINGNT REVELDPMENT t p �p iDEVELOPMENT REVIEW DMSIDN The Planning and Development Department, having made the above findings of fact and conclusions of law, recommends APPROVAL of application FLD2015-06021, subject to the following conditions: Conditions of Approval: 1. That no permanent structure shall be built in the four foot utility easement on the southern property boundary; 2. That application for a building permit be submitted no later than October 20, 2016, unless time extensions are granted pursuant to CDC Section 4-407; 3. That prior to the issuance of any permit, all requirements of the Land Resource, Engineering (including Environmental, Stormwater and Traffic) and Fire Departments be addressed; 4. That issuance of a development permit by the City of Clearwater does not in any way create any right on the part of an applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the City for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law; and, 5. That all other applicable local, state and/or federal permits be obtained before commencement of the development. Prepared by Planning and Development Department Staff: Melissa Hauck -Baker, AICP, Senior Planner ATTACHMENTS: Resume, Photographs Community Development Board — October 20, 2015 FLD2015-06021 - Page 9 Melissa Hauck -Ba her, AICP, NJPP 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater Florida 33756 727.562.4567 x2855 melissa.hauck-bakerna,mvclearwater.com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIFNCF • Senior Planner, Development Review Division — August 2015 - Present • Planner II, Development Review Division - July 2013 to August 2015 City of Clea rwater, FL Provide professional urban planning services to citizens, City Officials and businesses regarding Land Development Review procedures and legal requirements of the Community Development Code for the City. Assist in the day to day planning and zoning operations as well as long range planning initiatives, interdepartmental cooperation and assistance. Conduct plan reviews, site investigations, report preparation, meeting attendance and presentation of findings as relating to proposed development projects and required regulatory review procedures Professional PbannerComultant - March 2010 toJune 2013 Melissa Hauck -Baker, AICP, NJPP Provide consulting services to clients as requested for various residential and commercial scale projects as relating to the necessary zoning and planning review processes required by the specific governing entity. Supervise the preparation of reports and plans, conduct site visits, attend and present findings at municipal and all related public meetings, coordinate with applicant, various municipal staff and related professional consultants. Senio r Associate — Janua ry 2 005 to Maw h 2 010 Project Manager- April 2001 toJanuary 2005 KEPG, LLC, Atlantic City, NJ Oversee consulting services provided to municipal clients in the area of zoning planning master planning and redevelopment planning Review all proposed projects before any required municipal board, authority and commission as well as any additional jurisdictional requirement of other local, state and federal entities Provide professional guidance regarding planning and zoning concepts, zoning ordinance development, urban design issues, master plans, and redevelopment plans as outlined within the New Jersey Municipal Land Use Law. Supervise the preparation of reports and plans, conduct site visits, attend and present findings at municipal and all related public meetings, coordinate with firm staff, various municipal staff and related consultants to effectuate an efficient and thorough review process. Zoning Administrator - June 1998 to April 2001 City Planner- November 1994 toMay 1998 Historic Preservation Specialist - September 1993 to October 1994 City ofReading, PA Staff liaison and administrator to the Zoning Hearing Board, Planning Commission, Historic Architectural Review Board, Reading Redevelopment Authority and Fine Arts Board. Enforcement, interpretation and regulatory cooperation of the following ordinances; subdivision, land development, historic preservation, redevelopment and zoning. Provide assistance with downtown, neighborhood, comprehensive master plan, parks, recreation, and public property planning Conduct site inspections, process violations, and pursue cases through the court system Assist with review of proposed development projects in conjunction with planning engineering and building code staff as well as with the preparation of the Comprehensive Master Plan Generate graphics for various presentations as required by the department. EDUCATION Bachelor of Landscape Architecture, Magna Cum Laude, State University of New York, Syracuse, 1993 LICENSES AND ASSOCIATION MEMBERSHIPS American Institute of Certified Planners # 0233 51 (20 09 to Present) American Planning Association (2001 to Present) Florida Chapter (2013 to Present) New Jersey Chapter (2001 to 2012) Licensed New Jersey Professional Planner #33LI00609500 (2009 to Present) 0 View looking east 203 N Glenwood Avenue FLD2015-C-6021 �UQ 2-o 1 5 - 0(002 � Hauck -Baker, Melissa From: FloridaBats@aol.com Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2015 10:58 AM To: Hauck -Baker, Melissa Subject: 203 N. Glenwood Dear Melissa, Thank you for sending me the report. I am not in favor of this project, however, since it appears to meet the criteria, I assume it will be approved. However, I think painting lines for parking spaces would make the building look more. like an apartment building and not fit the existing character of the neighborhood. Four spaces are required, but 2 of those are stated that they will be inside of the existing garage. Cyndi Marks 1526 Pinewood Street 727-420-2178 OCT 2 J 2015 RAIINNOMMMEW �'_DZo6 - 0602_'1 Hauck -Baker, Melissa From: Heather Foderingham [hfod@aol.com] RECIM Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2015 9:14 AM To: Hauck -Baker, Melissa OCT 2 p 2015 Cc: LaFonda Gorham; gcretekos@hotmail.com Subject: Re: 203 N Glenwood PLA INGDEPMMgW CRY OF CLIA MAI R Thank you. After a quick reading of this, I still strongly object. It is NOT consistent with the character of the neighborhood, nor is the neighborhood I need of "in fill" projects Thank you Heather Foderingham 1538 Ridgewood St 33755 Sent from my iPhone On Oct 20, 2015, at 8:31 AM, <Melissa.Hauck-Baker@MyClearwater.com> <Melissa.Hauck-Baker@MyClearwater.com> wrote: Please find attached the staff report for the proposed project at 203 N Glenwood. If you have any questions or need additional information, please let me know. Thank you, Melissa Hauck -Baker, AICP, PP Senior Planner Planning & Development Department City of Clearwater 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 T: (727)562-4567 x2855 E: melissa.hauck-baker@mvclearwater.com Hours of Operation Monday -Friday: 8am - 4:30pm Customer Service Hours Monday, Tuesday, Thursday, Friday: 8am-4:30pm Wednesday 8am-2:30pm <Glenwood203 FinalStaffReport.pdf> Mr. Mark Sims i 1525'Oaltwooc St. ~' Clearwater, FL 33755 0 X9 015 2 d�� EPS PMENS � Np1�NG &DSC EPRWP�ER Pl-P` rl l TAM PA F -L 33�5 rye ,.. llll�„"'lill�t'llil�iTl�llil'1'lull'l�l'��ll�ll'l�{�lil��ls'.jl �}, Y � Mark Sims 1525 Oakwood St. Clearwater, FI 33755 10/15/15 I would like to object to the property at 203 N. Glenwood Ave being turned into a duplex. If this is approved it will lower the values of the properties in this neighborhood and make it less desirable for families to move in. This neighborhood is well-established with single family homes and it should be allowed to stay that way. Mark ms CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday, October 20, 2015, beginning at 1:00 p.m., in the City Council Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Ave, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following request: NOTE: All persons wishing to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meeting. Those cases that are not contested by the applicant, staff, neighboring property owners, etc. will be placed on a consent agenda and approved by a single vote at the beginning of the meeting. George R. Alexander is proposing the conversion of a single-family dwelling into a duplex in the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District for the property located at 203 N. Glenwood Avenue. The project is 18 feet in height and includes four parking spaces (Section 2- 204). Parcel Number: 11-29-15-31194-000-0640 Case Number: FLD2015-06021 Assigned Planner: Melissa Hauck -Baker, AICP, Senior Planner (727) 562-4567 ext. 2855 Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearing or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning and Development Director or City Clerk prior to the hearing. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board or Council, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need to request a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Sec 4-206 states that party status shall be granted by the Board in quasi-judicial cases if the person requesting such status demonstrates that s/he is substantially affected. Party status entitles parties to personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross-examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests, and needs to be requested and obtained during the case discussion before the CDB. An oath will be administered swearing in all persons giving testimony in quasi-judicial public hearing cases. If you wish to speak at the meeting, please wait to be recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons without party status speaking before the CDB shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes. Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning and Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756. Please contact the assigned planner at 562-4567 to discuss any questions or concerns about the project and/or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan. Michael Delk Planning and Development Director Rosemarie Call, MPA,CMC City Clerk City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing. A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL (727) 562-4093 WITH THEIR REQUEST. To learn more about presenting to Clearwater boards and City Council, go to http://clearwater.granicus.comNiewPublisher.php?view_id=11 and click on "Resident Engagement Video." You can also check the informational video out from any Clearwater public library. ea W- l53 ---- 1526 Dakw�l LA L�l 6 kod lch-oIo��, �� § 2-903 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE e. The proposed development provides posed for development, or parking is for appropriate buffers, enhanced available through any existing or landscape design and appropriate dis- planned and committed parking fa- tances between buildings. cilities or the shared parking for- mula in Article 3, Division 14. D. Educational facilities. 4. The design of all buildings complies with 1. The parcel proposed for development fronts the Downtown District design guidelines on a road with at least four lanes. in Division 5 of Article 3. 2. The proposed development does not have an accessway which connects to a local street at a point more than 100 feet from the four lane road on which the parcel proposed for development fronts. 3. Height: The increased height results in an improved site plan and/or improved de- sign and appearance. E. Governmental uses. 1. Height: a. The parcel proposed for development is located to the west of Myrtle, south of Drew and north of Court; b. The increased height results in an improved site plan and/or improved design and appearance; 2. All street frontage is designed and used for commercial purposes or comparable governmental service purposes; 3. Off-street parking: a. The physical characteristics of a pro- posed building are such that the likely uses of the property will re- quire fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required or that the use of significant portions of the building for storage or other non - parking demand -generating purposes or the physical context, including adjacent buildings and uses are such that there is a high probability that patrons will use modes of transpor- tation other than the automobile to access the use; b. Off-street parking: Adequate park- ing is available on a shared basis as determined by all existing land uses within 1,000 feet of the parcel pro - F. Indoor recreation/ entertainment facility. Supp. No. 20 CD2:90 1. Off-street parking: a. Adequate parking is available on a shared basis as determined by all existing land uses within 1,000 feet of the parcel proposed for develop- ment, or parking is available through any existing or planned and commit- ted parking facilities or the shared parking formula in Article 3, Divi- sion 14; b. The physical characteristics of a pro- posed building are such that the likely uses of the property will re- quire fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required or the physical context, including adjacent buildings and uses are such that there is a high probability that pa- trons will use modes of transporta- tion other than the automobile to access the use. Height: a. The parcel proposed for development is located to the west of Myrtle, south of Drew and north of Court; b. The increased height results in an improved site plan andlor improved design and appearance. G. Limited vehicle sales/display. The use of the parcel proposed for devel- opment shall be located in an enclosed structure. 2. The use of the parcel proposed for devel- opment shall have no outdoor displays. 3. No vehicle service shall be provided on the parcel proposed for development. A. - CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday, October 20, 2015, beginning at 1:00 p.m., in the City Council Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Ave, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following request: NOTE: All persons wishing to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meeting. Those cases that are not contested by the applicant, staff, neighboring property owners, etc. will be placed on a consent agenda and approved by a single vote at the beginning of the meeting. George R. Alexander is proposing the conversion of a single-family dwelling into a duplex in the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District for the property located at 203 N. Glenwood Avenue. The project is 18 feet in height and includes four parking spaces (Section 2 - 204). Parcel Number: 11-29-15-31194-000-0640 Case Number: FLD2015-06021 Assigned Planner: Melissa Hauck -Baker, AICP, Senior Planner (727) 562-4567 ext. 2855 Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearing or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning and Development Director or City Clerk prior to the hearing. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board or Council, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need to request a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Sec 4-206 states that party status shall be granted by the Board in quasi-judicial cases if the person requesting such status demonstrates that s/he is substantially affected. Party status entitles parties to personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross-examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests, and needs to be requested and obtained during the case discussion before the CDB. An oath will be administered swearing in all persons giving testimony in quasi-judicial public hearing cases. If you wish to speak at the meeting, please wait to be recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons without party status speaking before the CDB shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes. Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning and Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756. Please contact the assigned planner at 562-4567 to discuss any questions or concerns about the project and/or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan. Michael Delk Rosemarie Call, MPA,CMC Planning and Development Director City Clerk City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing. A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL (727) 562-4093 WITH THEIR REQUEST. To learn more about presenting to Clearwater boards and City Council, go to http://clearwater.granicus.comNiewPublisher.php?view_id=11 and click on "Resident Engagement Video." You can also check the informational video out from any Clearwater public library. LD2015-06021 SI.MS MARK J HINSON ISAAC CLARK RICHARD 15J5 OAKWOOD ST 118 N GLENWOOD AVE 29 PRICE AVE CL ARWATER FL 33755 CLEARWATER FL 33755 ERLANGER KY 41018 KARANTONIS MICHAEL V VELARDE ERIC S KELLER ROBERT A KARANTONIS ANTHONY V 211 N HIGHLAND AVE KELLER PAULETTE J 8 PINEWOOD RD CLEARWATER FL 33755 1530 ROSEWOOD ST SALEM NH 03079 CLEARWATER FL 33755 VANLEUVEN FLORENCE KELLEHER DELL V ******** 215 N GLENWOOD AVE 1510 GROVE ST ******** CLEARWATER FL 33755 CLEARWATER FL 33755 ******** TINSLEY STEVEN B LOUGHRY RUSSEL W KICINSKI SARAH PAYSON 300 EDGEWOOD AVE 1529 OAKWOOD ST KICINSKI DUSTIN RYAN CLEARWATER FL 33755 CLEARWATER FL 33755 1532 ROSEWOOD ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 DONATELLO EVELYN R REVOCABLE YOUNG SUSAN D ALEXANDER GEORGE R DONATELLO DON A TRE 214 N GLENWOOD AVE 203 N GLENWOOD AVE 535 45TH AVENUE NE CLEARWATER FL 33755 CLEARWATER FL 33755 ST PETERSBURG FL 33703 ROSE CHRISTOPHER WATT KELLEE J PAPAS CLEM ROSE AMANDA E 431 S HARBOR DR FORET-PAPAS CINDY M 1520 ROSEWOOD ST INDIAN ROCKS BEACH FL 33785 1537 OAKWOOD ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 CLEARWATER FL 33755 LYNCH HERBERT RYAN MOSTERD ASTRID MARIA GRIEWAHN KRISTIAN M & DEBRA A 217 N HIGHLAND AVE 125 N HIGHLAND AVE GRIEWAHN KRISTIAN MATHEW TRE CLEARWATER FL 33755 CLEARWATER FL 33755 12036 101ST AVE SEMINOLE FL 33772 BAILEY MISTY L ANDRUS BRIAN LAWSON CYNTHIA M 215 N HIGHLAND AVE 500 N OSCEOLA AVE PH -E LAWSON MARC A CLEARWATER FL 33755 CLEARWATER FL 33755 1536 ROSEWOOD ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 SKUKALEK DAVID L BALLMER WARD C EBLING LAUREL B REVOCABLE TRU SKUKALEK DOROTHY J BALLMER ALICE R EBLING LAUREL B TRE 212 N GLENWOOD AVE 124 GLENWOOD AVE N 4500 FOX CREEK RD CLEARWATER FL 33755 CLEARWATER FL 33755 WILDWOOD MO 63069 GUINAND JOEL H TRE KORSON MATTHEW A TRUST POINTER FERDINAND P GUINAND LINDA K TRE KORSON MATTHEW A TRE 1926 CLEVELAND ST 20 BAYWOOD CT 11643 PARSIPPANY TER CLEARWATER FL 33765 PALM HARBOR FL 34683 NORTH POTOMAC MD 20878 KAYE MICHELLE R LICCIARDI SAMUEL A JR 1:.24 ROSEWOOD ST 1529 DREW ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 CLEARWATER FL 33755 BLACKBURN GREGORY D SKYCREST NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOC. BLACKBURN PEGGY C Joanna Siskin 220 N GLENWOOD AVE 121 N. Crest Ave. CLEARWATER FL 33755 CLEARWATER FL 33755 GUINAND JOEL H TRE GLENNWOOD NEIGHBORS GUINAND LINDA K TRE Julie Thompson 20 BAYWOOD CT 1460 Turner St PALM HARBOR FL 34683 CLEARWATER FL 33755 BRAZIL MEGAN E Board of County Commissioners SKOLFIELD SIMAEN E 315 Court Street 1526 ROSEWOOD ST 5th Floor CLEARWATER FL 33755 Clearwater FL 33756 SABILLON OLVIN Coalition of Clearwater Homeow 1533 ROSEWOOD ST PO Box 8204 CLEARWATER FL 33755 Clearwater FL 33758 PETRIE MARK J Clearwater Neighborhood Coalit 1532 GROVE ST Carl Schrader President CLEARWATER FL 33755 1541 S. Frederica Avenue Clearwater FL 33756 KOOSER VICTORIA 202 N GLENWOOD AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 MITCHELL ROBERT S 1507 DREW ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 CORDERO MANUEL CORDERO SANDRA 1525 ROSEWOOD ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 ALLBRITTON DAVID ALLBRITTON MARYHELEN 217 PALM ISL NW CLEARWATER FL 33767 ORtg�tAi. RECM LL CCT o� ei twatef U PLANNING MPAIidI11IENr CIIYOFCtIrA MER Case # SIGN POSTING ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I hereby acknowledge receipt of public notice signs to post on property I own and/or represent that is being considered by the City of Clearwater for site plan approval and agree to post said signs on the subject property in a location where it is capable of being read from the most significant adjacent street a minimum of 10 days before the Community Development Board hearing scheduled on Property Owner or Authorized Representative: Print tNName At Si Name Q C� Date Community Development Board Hearing Date: October 20, 2015 The sign shall be posted on the property no later than: October 10, 2015 A time/date stamped photo of the sign, in place, on the subject property must be sent to the case planner no later than 10 days prior to the Community Development Board hearing date. 11 11:00 AM Case number: FLD2015-06021 -- 203 N GLENW09D AVE Owner(s): George R Alexander 203 N Glenwood Ave Clearwater, FL 33755-6025 PHONE: (727) 666-1806, Fax: No fax, Email: No email Applicant: George Alexander 203 N Glenwood Ave Clearwater, FL 33755-6025 PHONE: (727) 666-1806, Fax: No fax, Email: Georgealexander@g mail. Com Representative: Ellis Curry 1880 Magnolia Drive Clearwater, FL 33764 PHONE: (813) 598-1901, Fax: No fax, Email: Cuellcu@aol.Com Location: The 0.349 acre subject property is located at the northeast corner of Glenwood Avenue and Drew Street. Atlas Page: 279A Zoning District: Low Medium Density Residential Request: Flexible Development application to permit the conversion of an existing single- family dwelling into a three unit apartment dwelling as a Residential Infill Project within the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) Zoning District under Section 2 -204.E of the Community Development Code. Proposed Use: Attached Dwellings Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhood Coalition Association(s): Hillcrest Glennwood Neighbors Skycrest Neighborhood Assoc Presenter: Melissa Hauck-Baker,,,Planner II We i , A" 9/3/2015 26 DRC_ActionAgenda "EQUAL EDtPL()YNtE�'T MND APFIm.km'E AcflON EmPT.owr,° Workflow: Review Name Task Status Status Date Last Name Determination of Completeness Complete 06/09/2015 Hauck -Baker Solid Waste Review No Review Required 06/12/2015 Pryor Engineering Review Comments 06/15/2015 Simpson Traffic Eng Review No Comments 06/15/2015 Elbo Parks and Rec Review No Comments 06/18/2015 Reid Stormwater Review Comments 06/19/2015 Bawany Environmental Review Comments 06/19/2015 Kessler Planning Review Comments 06/22/2015 Hauck -Baker Land Resource Review Comments 06/24/2015 Crandall Fire Review Comments 06/26/2015 Schultz Route to Meeting Ready for DRC 06/29/2015 Hauck -Baker Harbor Master Review No Review Required 06/29/2015 Hauck -Baker Art Review No Reveiw Required 06/29/2015 Hauck -Baker 9/3/2015 27 DRC_ActionAgenda "EQUAL Empm)NENT AND AFFIRMATR'E ArnON ENVLONER° The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: Engineering Review General Conditions: The site plan was reviewed for General Engineering criteria. The additional details provided in the plan set may have been necessary for other departmental reviews to provide flexible development approval. Construction details shall be reviewed more thoroughly prior to receipt of the building permit. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit review. Additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Please apply for a right-of-way permit for any work on City Right of Way. The form can be found online at: <http://myclearwater. com/gov/depts/pwa/engin/FormsApplications.asp>. Engineering Review Prior to Community Development Board: There is a four foot utility easement on the Southern portion of the property. Please show this easement on the plans. Engineering Review Prior to Building Permit: As per City of Clearwater Reclaimed Water System Ordinances, 32.351, and 32.376, use of potable water for irrigation is prohibited; the irrigation system shall be hooked up to the reclaimed water system that is available to this site. As per Community Development Code Section 3-1907B, Sidewalks/Bicycle paths and City Construction Standard Index No. 109 for Sidewalks, Applicant shall bring all sub -standard sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project up to standard, including A.D.A. standards (raised detectable tactile surfaces or truncated domes per most recent FDOT Indices #304 and 310). As per Community Development Code Section 3-1701 B, Sidewalks required, Plan considerations, if the remodeling of an existing structure will exceed by 50% of the assessed evaluation of the property where a sidewalk does not exist, an applicant shall provide for construction of a sidewalk in an easement or right-of-way. If the property owner qualifies for an exception, the property owner shall pay a fee in lieu of constructing the sidewalk to be used to construct a sidewalk at a future date. Environmental Review General Notes: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Additional permits from State agencies, such as the Southwest Florida Water Management District or Florida Department of Environmental Protection, may be required. Approval does not relieve the applicant from the requirements to obtain all other required permits and authorizations. 9/3/2015 28 DRC_ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT A\D ATEraMATMIE ACTION EMrLowr.° Fire Review Shall meet the requirements of the Florida Fire Prevention Code 5th edition. Please acknowledge prior to CDB. Land Resource Review On the landscape plan call out the distance from the proposed trees to the sidewalk. Keep trees 10 feet away from the sidewalk. Planning Review Planning Review General Site Plan and Application Comments 0"A 1. The property is located within the Low Medium Density Residential District and the Residential Urban Future Land Use Plan designation. 2. The permitted density within the LMDR-RU is 7.5 dwelling units per acre or 5,808 square feet per unit. 3. The minimum lot size required for three units would be 17,424 square feet and the subject property as determined by our Engineering Department based on the submitted survey is 15,213.98 square feet which will not support the requested density and therefore the recommendation is to DENY the application. Stormwater Review General Comments DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review. Additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. e�) — r,�'D 2— ]�- f-"'b J ALL �-� L) 9/3/2015 29 DRC_ActionAgenda °EQI AL EMPLo),mEti'r AND AFFTRMATIvF. AcriO\T EMPLOYER° 4:00 PM Case number: ATA2015-08002 -- 2147 BURNICE DR Owner(s): Anita K Platt 2147 Burnice Drive Clearwater, FL 33764-4859 PHONE: (012) 345-6789, Fax: No fax, Email: No email Applicant: PHONE: No phone, Fax: No fax, Email: No email Location: Generally south of Druid Road, west of Belcher Road, east of South Hercules Avenue and north of Lakeview Road. Atlas Page: 308B Zoning District: Low Medium Density Residential Request: City initiated annexation of five parcels (previously signed ATAs) consisting of four single family homes into the City of Clearwater. a) Future Land Use Map amendment from Residential Low (RL) category (Pinellas County) to Residential Low (RL) category (City of Clearwater); b) Zoning Atlas amendment from R-3, Single Family (Pinellas County) to Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) district (City of Clearwater) The annexation includes the following addresses: 2147 Burnice Drive, 2167 Burnice Drive, 2173 Burnice Drive, 2118 Pleasant Parkway. Proposed Use: Detached Dwelling Neighborhood Association(s): Presenter: Katie See, Planner III 9/3/2015 30 DRC_ActionAgenda TQI AL EMPLOYMENT Ai\TD AfFIRMATR'F. YmON EmPI.o'Y'ER° Workflow: Review Name Task Status Status Date Last Name Determination of Completeness Complete 08/04/2015 See Traffic Eng Review No Comments 08/14/2015 Elbo Solid Waste Review No Comments 08/17/2015 Pryor Engineering Review Comments 08/18/2015 Simpson Parks and Rec Review No Comments 08/20/2015 Reid Environmental Review No Comments 08/21/2015 Kessler Stormwater Review No Comments 08/24/2015 Bawany Planning Review No Comments 08/26/2015 See Land Resource Review No Comments 08/26/2015 Crandall Fire Review Comments 08/28/2015 Schultz 9/3/2015 31 DRC_ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT kND AFFIRMaTAT AMON EMPLOYER° The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: Engineering Review Annexation into the City of Clearwater will generate monthly stormwater utility fees. Please note, any changes to the site and/or building shall require bringing all sub -standard sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project up to standard, including A.D.A. standards (truncated domes per FDOT Index #304). Fire Review Hydrant providing coverage for 2147 Burnice Dr. is being supplied with a 4" water main. Water supply for any hydrant cannot be less than 6" in diameter. Therefore, the water supply to the fire hydrant shown for this property is insufficient for fire protection and must upgrade to at least a 6" supply. This water system is part of the Pinellas County water system and not the City of Clearwater water system. Hydrant providing coverage for 2167 Burnice Dr. is being supplied with a 4" water main and this property is more than 500 feet from the hydrant. Water supply for any hydrant cannot be less than 6" in diameter and the distance from a fire hydrant to the property cannot be greater than 500 feet. Therefore, the water supply and distance to the fire hydrant shown for this property is insufficient for fire protection and must upgrade to at least a 6" supply and be located within 500 feet of the property. This water system is part of the Pinellas County water system and not the City of Clearwater water system. Hydrant providing coverage for 2118 Pleasant Parkway. is being supplied with a 3" water main. Water supply for any hydrant cannot be less than 6" in diameter. Therefore, the water supply to the fire hydrant shown for this property is insufficient for fire protection and must upgrade to at least a 6" supply. This water system is part of the Pinellas County water system and not the City of Clearwater water system. 9/3/2015 32 DRC_ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION E,tPLovER° x 0 110 S��� Clearwater, FL Community F lopment Code Page 1 of 3 Section 4-202. - Applications for development approval. A. All applications for development approval shall include the following information in addition to the information that the community development coordinator may generally require unless waived or modified by the community development coordinator: An application with plans and relevant support materials (the number to be established by the community development coordinator). 2. Data sheet. 3. Written responses (or narrative) explaining how compliance with the general applicability criteria and applicable flexibility criteria is being achieved by the development proposal. 4. Affidavit to authorize agent/representative. 5. if the application would result in the removal or relocation of mobile home owners residing in a mobile home park as provided in F.S. § 723.083, the application must provide information sufficient to show that adequate mobile home parks or other suitable facilities exist for the relocation of the mobile home owners. Mobile home owners shall be defined as those persons who own their coach but rent a lot space within the subject property and are subject to the provisions and protections provided for in F.S. Ch. 723. The application shall include the following information: a. The total number of mobile homes in the park that are owned by mobile homeowners; and b. Monthly rent charged for each space occupied by a mobile homeowner; and c. A list of the names and mailing addresses of the present mobile home owners within the subject property. This list should identify those units that are suitable for moving and for which only vacant replacement lots will be identified; and d. Household profile for each owner -occupied mobile home within the park, including number of adults, number of children, and whether pets have been allowed in the park. Replacement units identified should be suitable for similar household profiles; and e. A list of other mobile home parks or other suitable facilities with vacant units available at the time of application that are of a similar cost profile to which owners residing in the subject property could reasonably expect to relocate. This list will include, at a minimum, name and address of the park, park contact name and phone number, the number of vacant spaces available and the cost of those spaces, park guidelines on age and condition of acceptable units, number of rental units available and the cost of those rentals. All parks or other suitable facilities must be located within a ten -mile radius of the subject property and serve the same age, household, and occupancy profiles as the subject property. f. Any other information that the applicant deems necessary to demonstrate that adequate mobile home parks or other suitable facilities exist for the relocation of the mobile home owners. I:1 about:blank 8/27/2015 ' Clearwater, FL Community L lopment Code Page 2 of 3 Simultaneous applications. If more than one approval is required (for example, Level One and Level Three) for a particular development proposal, with the exception of an application for a building permit, certificate of occupancy or business tax receipt, an applicant is required to submit all applications for development approval at the same time. C. Determination of completeness. 1. Determination of completeness. Within seven working days after the published application deadline, the community development coordinator shall determine whether an application is complete. a. Application complete. If the community development coordinator determines that the application is complete, he shall notify the applicant in writing that the application has been accepted for filing. b. Notice to abutting property owners. When the community development coordinator has accepted an application for level one approval (flexible standard development) for filing, he shall immediately notify the owners of the property within 200 feet of the property, excluding any water bodies within that distance, which is the subject of the application and any affected neighborhood association and any citywide neighborhood association in writing that an application has been filed, the nature of the approval requested and the procedure for consideration of the application, as well as the right of the owner to appeal a decision. c. Application not complete. If the community development coordinator determines that the application is not complete, he shall notify the applicant, specifying the deficiencies of the application. No further development review shall be taken by the community development coordinator until the deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. 2. Determination of legal sufficiency. Level one (minimum standard development). Within five working days after a determination that a level one (minimum development standards) application is complete, the community development coordinator shall determine whether the application is legally sufficient, that is whether the required application materials have been prepared in a substantively competent manner. If the community development coordinator determines that any portion of the application is insufficient, the community development coordinator shall notify the applicant of the reasons that the application is legally insufficient, that the application is deemed withdrawn and no further development review shall be conducted until the application is resubmitted. Such notification shall constitute an administrative decision which may be appealed to the community development board pursuant to Section 4-501(A)(2). 3. Determination of legal sufficiency: Level One (flexible standard development), Level Two or Level Three approvals.,Within 18 working days after a determination that the application is complete, -the members of the development review committee in the case of Level One (flexible standard development), Level Two or Level Three approvals shall determine whether the application is legally sufficient, that is whether the required application materials have been prepared in a substantively competent manner. If any member of the development review committee determines that any portion of the application is insufficient, the community development coordinator shall notify the applicant of the reasons that the application is legally insufficient, that the application is deemed withdrawn and no further development review shall be about:blank 8/27/2015 Clearwater, FL Community r lopment Code Page 3 of 3 conducted until the application is resubmitted. Such notification shall constitute an administrative decision which may be appealed to the community development board pursuant to Section 4-501(A)(2). D. Review by development review committee. After an application for development approval is determined to be complete and legally sufficient, the development review committee shall review the application in accordance with Division 3 of this Article if a Level One approval, Division 4 if a Level Two approval and Division 6 if a Level Three approval. E. Issuance of development order. The community development coordinator shall issue a development order for Level One (flexible standard) approval. F. Fees. Except for those applications submitted on behalf of governmental agencies, all applications for development approval shall be accompanied by the payment of a fee established from time -to - time by the city commission and maintained as Appendix A to the City Code. G. Resubmission of application affecting same property. No application shall be accepted during the following time periods after the denial of a substantially similar application affecting the same property or any portion thereof: a. Nine months for Level Two approvals. b. Twelve months for Level Three approvals. 2. The time periods specified in this subsection shall be deemed to have commenced only after the completion of any administrative or judicial review which may have been sought. (Ord. No. 6526-00, § 1, 6-15-00; Ord. No. 6928-02, §§ 94-97, 5-2-02; Ord. No. 6998-02, § 1, 7-18-02; Ord. No. 7106-03, §§ 12-14,9-18-03; Ord. No. 7449-05, §§ 27 -30,12 -15 -OS; Ord. No. 7616-06, § 2, 5-18-06; Ord. No. 7725-07, § 2, 2-15-07; Ord. No. 7835-07, § 20,1-17-08; Ord. No. 8042-09, § 4, 6-4-09; Ord. No. 8310-12, § 5, 2-2-12) about:blank 8/27/2015 LL AUG 2 5 2015 0>-'e Planning & Development Department Car�ater �4•FE�fi�.®� A6�® _�-- LEGISLATNE SRVCS DEPT Appeal Application IT IS INCUMBENT UPON THE APPLICANT TO SUBMIT COMPLETE AND CORRECT INFORMATION. ANY MISLEADING, DECEPTIVE, INCOMPLETE OR INCORRECT INFORMATION MAY INVALIDATE YOUR APPLICATION. ALL APPLICATIONS ARE TO BE FILLED OUT COMPLETELY AND CORRECTLY, AND SUBMITTED IN PERSON (NO FAX OR DELIVERIES) TO THE CITY CLERKS OFFICE. SECTION 4-S02.A: AN APPEAL OF A LEVEL ONE (FLEXIBLE STANDARD) APPLICATION MAY BE INITIATED BY AN APPLICANT OR PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN THE REQUIRED NOTICE AREA AND WHO PRESENTED COMPETENT SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE IN THE LEVEL ONE REVIEW, WHICH IS THE SUBJECT OF THE APPLICATION WITHIN SEVEN DAYS OF THE DATE THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER IS ISSUED. THE FILING OF AN APPLICATION/NOTICE OF APPEAL SHALL STAY THE EFFECT OF THE DECISION PENDING THE FINAL DETERMINATION OF THE CASE. SECTION 4-502.B: APPEAL OF ALL OTHER APPLICATIONS OTHER THAN LEVEL ONE APPROVAL FLEXIBLE STANDARD MAY BE INITIATED BY THE APPLICANT, OR BY ANY PERSON GRANTED PARTY STATUS WITHIN 14 DAYS OF THE DECISION. SUCH APPLICATION SHALL BE FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK IN A FORM SPECIFIED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR IDENTIFYING WITH SPECIFICITY THE BASIS FOR THE APPEAL AND ACCOMPANIED BY A FEE AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 4-202(E). THE FILING OF AN APPLICATION/NOTICE OF APPEAL SHALL STAY THE EFFECT OF THE DECISION PENDING THE FINAL DETERMINATION OF THE CASE. APPEALS TO THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD: $250 APPEALS TO HEARING OFFICER: $500 PROPERTY OWNER (PER DEED): George R. Alexander MAILING ADDRESS: 203 N. Glenwood Ave. Clearwater, FL PHONE NUMBER: 727.666.1806 EMAIL: georgeralexander@gmail.com AGENT OR REPRESENTATIVE: Ellis Curry, Architect MAILING ADDRESS: 1880 Magnolia Dr. Clearwater, FL 33764 PHONE NUMBER: 813.598.1901 EMAIL: cuellcu@aol.com ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: 203 N. Glenwood Ave. Clearwater, FL PARCEL NUMBER(S): 11-29-15-31194-000-0640 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 64 Glenwood according to the plot thereof as recorded in plot book 8, page 14 CASE NUMBER TO BE APPEALED: 'r�� �.C%� C� 06O2.I DATE OF DECISION: Planning & Development Department,100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-5624865 Page 1 of 2 Revised 01112 a SELECT THE SPECIFIC APPEAL: APPEALS TO THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD (CDB).- Orders, CDB):Orders, requirements, decisions or determinations made X Any denials deemed to have occurred as result of the by an administrative official in the administration of the failure of the Community Development Coordinator to act Community Development Code, except for enforcement within the time limits provided in this Community actions. Development Code. „ Administrative interpretations of the Community ❑ Denials of any permit or license issued under the Development Code. provisions of the Community Development Code. ❑ Level One (Flexible Standard Development and Minimum Standard) approval decisions. APPEALS TO A HEARING OFFICER: ❑ Decisions of the Community Development Board regarding ❑ Decisions of the Community Development Board regarding Level One applications. Level Two applications. ❑ Any denials deemed to have occurred as a result of the failure of the Community Development Board to act within the time limits provided in the Community Development Code, or as a result of the failure of any other administrative official or body (other than the Community Development Coordinator or the City Council) to act within the time limits provided by any other applicable law, rule, policy, or regulation then in effect. BASIS OF APPEAL (Explain in detail the basis for the appeal): Originally Matt Jackson, City of Clearwater, said that this property qualified for 3 dwelling which is the main reason we went through the effort and expense of making the Flexible Development application. Then Melissa Hauck Baker, City of Clearwater, said our application was complete on June 29, 2015. Everyone supported the application except the Planning Review who now said we could not have 3 dwelling units only 2.6175; contrary to what had previously been stated. When we addressed their comment with a revised application resubmittal we were then told that our application was now legally insufficient and we were told to contact Melissa Hauck Baker with any questions. We had never been informed in advance of or given any opportunity to attend the DRC sufficiency meeting/action where this determination was made. We again revised and resubmitted our application showing the 2.6175 units that they required to cure their determination but Melissa Hauck Baker is now refusing to accept our application and she took an entire week to communicate this; her action being an attempt to toll the time limits and thwart this appeal. The administration of this application has been fraught with repeated errors, misapplication/misinterpretation of the code and obfuscation. STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all Sworn to and subscribed before me this 225 4t”- day of representations made in this application are true and l�l.l l Ca u S� QO 6 to me and/or by accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the tl; S (Z Curry who is personally known has property described in this application. produced Fto rdn. `D r we . S (2% es_vi S -P as identification. Signature of property owner or rept' entative N public, WI Notary Public, Sta%af Florid Commission # FF 27391 My commission expires: fires 1. 17 Planning & Development Department,100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 2 of 2 Revised 01112 CITE OF CLEARWATER. Pier Orrlce Box 4 748, CUARWATER, FLopmA 33758-4748 l;iANlclj;,o. SLwicEs BUn.DING, 1060 SOUTH MYRTLIiAVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33 756 Iri,ePt{ONIi (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT Ellis Curry; AIA 1880 Magnolia Drive Clearwater, FL 33764 RE: 203 N. Glenwood Avenue — FLD2015-06021 Dear Mr. Curry: August 7, 2015 Pursuant to Section 4-202.C.3., Community Development Code (CDC), the Level Two, Flexible Development, application for the property addressed as 203 N. Glenwood Avenue (FLD2015-06021) has been found to be legally insufficient. The reasons for this determination are as follows: • The subject property has a Countywide Future Land Use Designation of Residential Urban (RU), which permits a maximum of 7.5 dwelling units per acre of land (this is established as part of Policy. A.2.2.1 of the City of Clearwater Comprehensive Plan, as well as in Section 2-201.1., CDC, as it pertains to the subject property's zoning designation of Low Medium Density Residential). • According to the survey, prepared by EMME Land Surveying, LLC dated March 24, 2015; the subject property encompasses 15,213.98 square feet (0.349 acres). • Based upon the maximum permitted density and the property size, the subject property may have a maximum of two dwelling units. • It is noted that the actual calculation of dwelling units is 2.6175; however, pursuant to Section 3-902.E.. CDC, when calculating the density of a property, the total shall not be rounded up to the next whole number. • The development proposal originally submitted on June 1, 2015, and revised August 3, 2015, includes a request for three dwelling units on the subject property. • Pursuant to Section 3-902.A., CDC, notwithstanding any provision in Article 2 of this CDC, no application for development approval shall be granted for any development which exceeds the density for that development in the comprehensive plan. Based upon the above, it is not possible for this application to be approved. Therefore, pursuant to Section 4- 202.C.3., CDC, the application is deemed to be withdrawn and no further development review shall be conducted. This notification constitutes an administrative decision under Section 4-202.C.3., CDC, which may be appealed to the Community Development Board pursuant Section 4-501.A.2., CDC. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Melissa Hauck -Baker, AICP, Planner II, at (727) 562-4567 x2855 or via email at Melissa.hauck-baker Cmmvelearwater.coin. Sincerely. �--7 MichaG.1 elk. AICP I'lanninCY & Development Director VIr. Geor,,e R. \leiander. Properi\ 0 k ne: M 'EQUAL 1"MI'Lovau:N1 9:15 AM Case number: FLD2015-06021 -- 203 N GLENWOOD AVE Owner(s): George R Alexander 203 N Glenwood Ave Clearwater, FL 33755-6025 PHONE: (727) 666-1806, Fax: No fax, Email: No email Applicant: George Alexander 203 N Glenwood Ave Clearwater, FL 33755-6025 PHONE: (727) 666-1806, Fax: No fax, Email: Georgealexander@gmail.Com Representative: Ellis Curry 1880 Magnolia Drive Clearwater, FL 33764 PHONE: (813) 598-1901, Fax: No fax, Email: Cuellcu@aol.Com Location: The 0.373 acre subject property is located at the northeast corner of Glenwood Avenue and Drew Street. Atlas Page: 279A Zoning District: Low Medium Density Residential Request: Flexible Development application to permit the conversion of an existing single- family dwelling into a three unit apartment dwelling as a Residential Infill Project within the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) Zoning District under Section 2 -204.E of the Community Development Code. Proposed Use: Attached Dwellings Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhood Coalition Association(s): Hillcrest Glennwood Neighbors Skycrest Neighborhood Assoc Presenter: Melissa Hauck -Baker, Planner II 7/1/2015 14 DRC_ActionAgenda °EQi-AL BiPLOYMENTr AND AFFuzmk-fPt� AcOON EbtPLOwp," �d Workflow: Review Namer Task Status Status Date Last Name Determination of Completeness Complete 06/09/2015 Hauck -Baker Solid Waste Review No Review Required 06/12/2015 Pryor Engineering Review Comments 06/15/2015 Simpson Traffic Eng Review No Comments 06/15/2015 Elbo Parks and Rec Review No Comments 06/18/2015 Reid Stormwater Review Comments 06/19/2015 Bawany Environmental Review Comments 06/19/2015 Kessler Planning Review Comments 06/22/2015 Hauck -Baker Land Resource Review Comments 06/24/2015 Crandall Fire Review Comments 06/26/2015 Schultz Route to Meeting Ready for DRC 06/29/2015 Hauck -Baker Harbor Master Review No Review Required 06/29/2015 Hauck -Baker Art Review No Reveiw Required 06/29/2015 Hauck -Baker 7/1/2015 15 DRC_ActionAgenda "EQUAL ENtrt.oYINIENT , ND Amiu�i.AxrNr: ACTION ENtpt.oYER° '10 The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: Engineering Review General Conditions: The site plan was reviewed for General Engineering criteria. The additional details provided in the plan set may have been necessary for other departmental reviews to provide flexible development approval. Construction details shall be reviewed more thoroughly prior to receipt of the building permit. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit review. Additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Please apply for a right-of-way permit for any work on City Right of Way. The form can be found online at: <http://myclearwater.com/gov/depts/pwa/engin/FormsApplications.asp>. Engineering Review Prior to Community Development Board: There is a four foot utility easement on the Southern portion of the property. Please show this easement on the plans. Engineering Review Prior to Building Permit: As per City of Clearwater Reclaimed Water System Ordinances, 32.351, and 32.376, use of potable water for irrigation is prohibited; the irrigation system shall be hooked up to the reclaimed water system that is available to this site. As per Community Development Code Section 3-1907B, Sidewalks/Bicycle paths and City Construction Standard Index No. 109 for Sidewalks, Applicant shall bring all sub -standard sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project up to standard, including A.D.A. standards (raised detectable tactile surfaces or truncated domes per most recent FDOT Indices #304 and 310). As per Community Development Code Section 3-1701 B, Sidewalks required, Plan considerations, if the remodeling of an existing structure will exceed by 50% of the assessed evaluation of the property where a sidewalk does not exist, an applicant shall provide for construction of a sidewalk in an easement or right-of-way. If the property owner qualifies for an exception, the property owner shall pay a fee in lieu of constructing the sidewalk to be used to construct a sidewalk at a future date. Environmental Review General Notes: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Additional permits from State agencies, such as the Southwest Florida Water Management District or Florida Department of Environmental Protection, may be required. Approval does not relieve the applicant from the requirements to obtain all other required permits and authorizations. 7/1/2015 16 DRC_ActionAgenda �Qt �.L EmPI.01'A1F.�«`r :i\D AFFIlL1i.4T>L'G ACCIO\ 'tiPwl'Eli 1•A Fire Review Shall meet the requirements of the Florida Fire Prevention Code 5th edition. Please acknowledge prior to CDB. Land Resource Review On the landscape plan call out the distance from the proposed trees to the sidewalk. Keep trees 10 feet away from the sidewalk. Planning Review Planning Review General Site Plan and Application Comments 1. The property is located within the Low Medium Density Residential District and the Residential Urban Future Land Use Plan designation. 2. The permitted density within the LMDR-RU is 7.5 dwelling units per acre or 5,808 square feet per unit. 3. The minimum lot size required for three units would be 17,424 square feet and the subject property as determined by our Engineering Department based on the submitted survey is 15,213.98 square feet which will not support the requested density and therefore the recommendation is to DENY the application. Stormwater Review General Comments DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review. Additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. 7/1/2015 17 DRC_ActionAgenda "EQUAL Fmpi.O}`WF\T AND AFFitzmAmrF AC,nON ENmoYEI;n Hauck -Baker, Melissa From: Ellis Curry [cuellcu@aol.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2015 7:27 AM To: Hauck -Baker, Melissa Subject: Re: 203 N Glenwood Dear Mrs. Hauck -Baker, Did you receive our reply from June 25 and forward it to Mr. Tefft, and can you please provide his response? Please let me know. We would be happy to coordinate any of this with you. We were disappointed to see that there is already a recommendation to deny before the meeting has even taken place; shouldn't all the information be heard before a decision to deny has been made? After careful review, we are also extremely concerned about the way our request has been re -stated on the Cover sheet as "application to permit the conversion of an existing single family dwelling into a three unit apartment dwelling". That is not the request we provided and it does not fairly and accurately represent our application. If staff has an exception to our Description of Request, we would be happy to coordinate it with you but this needs to be corrected before proceeding because it does not fairly and accurately represent our application. Similarly, the Cover sheet request also states "with a front setback of 5 feet and side setback of zero feet as a Residential Infill Project". This also does not accurately represent our application. Can you please tell me where this language came from? Likewise, this would need to be corrected before proceeding. I presume that our application can simply be put on the next available meeting until this is coordinated. Please let me know this morning. We would very much like the opportunity to coordinate this with you all prior to the DRC meeting; I thought there was supposed to be some coordination. Thank you for your assistance with this, Ellis Curry -----Original Message ----- From: Melissa. Hauck -Baker <Melissa.Hauck-Baker(c)-MyClearwater.com> To: cuellcu <cuellcu _aol.com> Cc: georgeralexander <georgeralexander(agmail.com> Sent: Mon, Jun 29, 2015 8:25 am Subject: 203 N Glenwood Mr. Curry, Please find attached the comments of the Development Review Committee pertaining to the FLD2015-06021 application The item is scheduled for 9:15 am on Thursday, July 2nd meeting. If you have any questions or need additional information, please let me know. Thank you, Melissa Hauck -Baker, AICP, PP Planner II Planning & Development Department City of Clearwater 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 T: (727)562-4567 x2855 E: melissa.hauck-baker a-mvclearwater.com Hours of Operation Monday -Friday: 8am - 4:30pm Customer Service Hours Monday, Tuesday, Thursday, Friday: 8am-4:30pm Wednesday 8am-2:30pm Hauck -Baker, Melissa From: Ellis Curry [cuellcu@aol.com] Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2015 7:24 AM To: Hauck -Baker, Melissa Subject: Re: 203 N Glenwood Dear Mrs. Hauck -Baker, Thank you for your letter. We took the time to carefully review this and need to point out that we had already been told by Mr. Jackson at the City of Clearwater that 3 units were allowed on this property (added below); this is the reason we went through the effort and expense of making this application. That combined with the fact that we are simply trying to formalize 3 existing attached dwelling units that have been operated for more than 60 years would clearly make this an acceptable application to Staff. We realize that often these unit limits are intended for larger new construction and don't really work when applied to an existing small site. We hope that you all are able to acknowledge and accommodate these special circumstances. We are simply trying to continue in the same manner; operating peacefully and compatibly within the neighborhood. Thank you, Ellis Curry ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: <Matthew.Jacksonna myclearwater.com> Date: Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 4:09 PM Subject: 203 North Glenwood Avenue To: georgeralexander(o)amail.com George: Per our discussion I looked over the subject property to ascertain the allowable number of dwelling units and the proper application to establish attached dwelling use. The attached level II application is what you would use to request attached dwellings for the subject property. This is a full site plan review in which the site must be brought up to current Code standards including landscaping and parking. Two parking spaces are required for each unit and three units are allowed on the subject property which would require six spaces, one of these being handicapped. Please keep in mind that back -out parking is not permitted for attached dwelling use. These applications are typically submitted by and engineering, planning or architecture firm and see attached for the review calendar. Applications are due by noon on the submittal dates. Below are the criteria to be addressed on page seven of the application. Have a great day and let me know if I can be of further assistance. Residential infill projects. 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from one or more of the following: intensity; other development standards; 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties; 3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the district; 4. The uses within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses; 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; 6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole; 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height, off-street parking, access or other development standards are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. Sincerely, Watt Jackson Planner III City of Clearwater Planning & Development Department 100 S Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 727.562.4504 (work) -----Original Message ----- From: Melissa. Hauck -Baker <Melissa.Hauck-Baker@MyClearwater.com> To: cuellcu <cuelicu@aol.com> Sent: Thu, Jun 18, 2015 9:39 am Subject: 203 N Glenwood Mr. Curry, I have been directed by my Supervisor, Robert Tefft, to contact you regarding the submitted application for the case FLD2015-06021 at 203 N. Glenwood Avenue. The subject property is located within the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District and the density as established by Pinellas County is 7.5 dwelling units per acre. A three unit residential development would require a minimum lot size of 17,424 square feet and the subject property is 16,244 square feet. As the property is not large enough to accommodate the density staff is unable to support the application. We are contacting you at this point in order for you to have the opportunity to formally Withdraw the application and be refunded the submitted fees. Please let me know if you would like to discuss further and I am happy to provide you with any assistance possible Thank you, Melissa Hauck -Baker, AICP, PP Planner II Planning & Development Department City of Clearwater 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 T: (727)562-4567 x2855 E: melissa.hauck-bakerO-mvclearwater.com Hours of Operation Monday -Friday: 8am - 4:30pm Customer Service Hours Monday, Tuesday, Thursday, Friday: 8am-4:30pm Wednesday 8am-2:30pm t rK 4PUcA n,� Anpun��' �vitinuaM.ce, L ITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNuNc, & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTr3E T Possr OFrICE Box 4748; CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-44748 �q�hrY1b MUNICIPAL SERNTCES BUILDING, 100 SOL,'TH MYRTLE,VENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 jr+���1Yln TxLEPHomN (727) 562-4767 FAX (727) 562-4865. 9:15 AM Case number: FLD2015-06021 -- 203 N GLENWOOD AVE Owner(s): George R Alexander 203 N Glenwood Ave Clearwater, FL 33755-6025 PHONE: 7276661806, Fax: No fax, Email: No email Applicant: George Alexander 203 N Glenwood Ave Clearwater, FL 33755-6025 PHONE: 7276661806, Fax: No fax, Email: Georgealexander@g mail. Com Representative: Ellis Curry 1880 Magnolia Drive Clearwater, FL 33764 PHONE: 8135981901, Fax: No fax, .Email: Cuellcu@aol.Com Location: The 0.373 acre subject property is located at the northeast corner of Glenwood Avenue and Drew Street. Atlas Page: 279A Zoning District: Low Medium Density Residential Request: Flexible Development application to permit the conversion of an existing single- family dwelling into a three unit apartment dwelling as a Residential Infill Project within the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) Zoning District under Section 2 -204.E of the Community Development Code. Proposed Use: Attached Dwellings Neighborhood Hillcrest Association(s): Presenter: Melissa Hauck -Baker, Planner II 7/1/2015 "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMAIWE AcrION EmIILMER" DRC—Comments ��war CITY OF CLEARWATER ?= �✓� ; 9A PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT �`� `' a�• Possr OFFICE Boa 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 3.3758-4748 pre�4 �q(irJ MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100SOUTHMYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 +�x•x�- TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 5624865 The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: Engineering Review General Conditions: The site plan was reviewed for General Engineering criteria. The additional details provided in the plan set may have been necessary for other departmental reviews to provide flexible development approval. Construction details shall be reviewed more thoroughly prior to receipt of the building permit. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit review. Additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Please apply for a right-of-way permit for any work on City Right of Way. The form can be found online at: <hftp://myclearwater. com/gov/depts/pwa/engin/FormsAppl ications.asp>. Engineering Review Prior to Community Development Board: There is a four foot utility easement on the Southern portion of the property. Please show this easement on the plans. Engineering Review Prior to Building Permit: As per City of Clearwater Reclaimed Water System Ordinances, 32.351, and 32.376, use of potable water for irrigation is prohibited; the irrigation system shall be hooked up to the reclaimed water system that is available to this site. As per Community Development Code Section 3-1907B, Sidewalks/Bicycle paths and City Construction Standard Index No. 109 for Sidewalks, Applicant shall bring all sub -standard sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project up to standard, including A.D.A. standards (raised detectable tactile surfaces or truncated domes per most recent FDOT Indices #304 and 310). As per Community Development Code Section 3-1701 B, Sidewalks required, Plan considerations, if the remodeling of an existing structure will exceed by 50% of the assessed evaluation of the property where a sidewalk does not exist, an applicant shall provide for construction of a sidewalk in an easement or right-of-way. If the property owner qualifies for an exception, the property owner shall pay a fee in lieu of constructing the sidewalk to be used to construct a sidewalk at a future date. Environmental Review General Notes: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Additional permits from State agencies, such as the Southwest Florida Water Management District or Florida Department of Environmental Protection, may be required. Approval does not relieve the applicant from the requirements to obtain all other required permits and authorizations. 7/1/2015 2 DRC—Comments "EQUAL EmpLOYMENT AND .A.FFIRNIXMI: ACTION BMPLOYEV Fire Review Shall meet the requirements of the Florida Fire Prevention Code 5th edition. Please acknowledge prior to CDB. Land Resource Review On the landscape plan call out the distance from the proposed trees to the sidewalk. Keep trees 10 feet away from the sidewalk. Planning Review Planning Review General Site Plan and Application Comments 1. The property is located within the Low Medium Density Residential District and the Residential Urban Future Land Use Plan designation. 2. The permitted density within the LMDR-RU is 7.5 dwelling units per acre or 5,808 square feet per unit. 3. The minimum lot size required for three units would be 17,424 square feet and the subject property as determined by our Engineering Department based on the submitted survey is 15,213.98 square feet which will not support the requested density and therefore the recommendation is to DENY the application. Stormwater Review General Comments DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review. Additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. 7/1/2015 3 DRC—Comments "EQUAL BIPLOYNIENT kN'D .AFFIRM f5`E ACTION Emtpwy-ER° CITY OAFfC,LMEARWATErNr R PosT OFFICE Box 4748, CLMWATER, FLORIDA 33758 4748 p� 0`�S MuNmPAL SERvTCGS BuILDIT;G, 100 Souni MYRTU. Aw-Nur, CLEARwkiu, FLORIDA 33756 TRt.EPHONF. (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 5624576 June 5, 2015 ELLIS CURRY 1880 MAGNOLIA DRIVE CLEARWATER, FL 33764 VIA FAX: RE: FLD2015-06021 -- 203 N GLENWOOD AVE-- Letter of Completeness Dear ELLIS CURRY: The Planning and Development staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2015-06021. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is complete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on July 2, 2015, in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in downtown Clearwater. You will be contacted by the Planning Department's Administrative Analyst within one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. Additional comments may be generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 562-4567x2855 or melissa.Hauck- Baker@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, I-IL65A 4 -6A -90A Melissa Hauck -Baker Planner II 6/5/2015 Letter_ Of Completeness "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFEIRMATNE AcrION EMPLOYER" Map Request for APP, DVA, FLD, FLS, HDA and PLT Applications Planner Name: Melissa Hauck -Baker Case Number: FLD2015-06021 Address: 203 N Glenwood Avenue Date Requested: 6/15/15 Date Requested for (date): 7/15/15 Electronic copies of the following maps required ❑ YES ❑NO 1. Location Map 2. Aerial Map 3. Zoning Map 4. Existing Surrounding Uses Map Required Documents to be submitted to Engineering ❑ Legal Description (must be part of survey or warranty deed) ❑ Survey - PLEASE RETURN ❑ Map with Proposed Site Highlighted ❑ EDR - no hard copies submitted - all submission material is accessible through Accela IN ADDITION TO THE REQUESTED MAPS, PLEASE PROVIDE VERIFICATION THAT THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION WE HAVE PROVIDED IS CORRECT AND ACCURATE. Thomas Mahony PSM, Geographic Technology Manager Signature 09B N",IMBER: 2015069 FOR THE BENEFIT OF.• GE RGANDER SEC77ON 11, TOWNSHIF ) SOUTH, RANG 15 EAST PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA STREET ADDRESS: 203 N. GLENWOOD AVENUE CLEARWATER, FL 33755 LEGAL DESCRIP770N. I ABBREWA77ON LEGEND. LOT 64, BLOCK GLENWOOD SUED/VISION, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 8, PAGE 14, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS 'COUNTY, FLORIDA. SURVEYORS N07FS: 1. ALL CORNERS FOUND HAVE NO NUMBER DESIGNA77NG THE PREVIOUS SURVEYOR OR COMPANY EXCEPT AS SHOWN. Z ALL BEARINGS AND DISTANCES ARE MEASURED PER PLAT AND/OR DEED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. J. NO UNDERGROUND ENCROACHMENTS, FOUNDA71ONS OR U77LI77ES HAVE BEEN LOCATED OR SHOWN UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 4. NO INSTRUMENTS OF RECORD REFLEC77NG EASEMENTS, RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND/OR OWNERSHIP HAVE BEEN FURNISHED EXCEPT AS SHOWN HEREON. 5. BASIS OF BEARINGS. • SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF ROSEWOOD STREET, BEING N. 6972'50" E. PER PRIOR SURVEY (NO BEARINGS ON PLAT). 6. ACCORDING TO THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY NA77ONAL FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP NUMBER 12103CO109H, (COMMUNITY NUMBER 125096, PANEL 0109, SUFFIX H) MAP REVISED DATE 9/3/2003, AND THE BUILDING SHOWN HEREON IS IN FLOOD ZONE X. Z THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED WITH 7HE BENEFIT OF PERVIOUS SURVEY PERFORMED BY AMERICAN SURVEYING AND MAPPING DATED 3/4/02. (S) REFLECTS THIS DATA F.I.R. — FOUND IRON ROD (SIZE INDICATED) SLA = SET IRON ROD 1/2' L87895 EMME- FLP. = FOUND IRON PIPE (SIZE INDICATED) F.P.P. — FOUND IRON PIPE PINCHED (SIZE INDICATED) F.N.D. = FOUND NAIL do DISK SN.D. = SET NAIL & DISK L87895 EMME' F.C.M. = FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT P.R.M. = PERMANENT REFERENCE MONUMENT P.C.P. = PERMANENT CONTROL POINT P.I. = POINT OF INTERSECTION P.C. = POINT OF CURVE P.O.B. = POINT OF BEGINNING RIW = RIGHT—OF—WAY TYP. = TYPICAL S/W = SIDEWALK O.R. = OFFICIAL RECORDS P.SM. = PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR & MAPPER 71.) DENOTES UTILITY POLE wrn DENOTES WATER METER 8PH DENOTES POOL HEATER DENOTES POOL PUMP SEG = SEC77ON TW. = TOWNSHIP RGE. — RANGE (D) — DEED (P) = PLAT (M) = MEASURED (C) = CALCULATED (F) = RELD (R) = RADIAL P.B. — PLAT BOOK PC. = PAGE CONC. — CONCRETE CAC = COVERED CONO ASPH. — ASPHALT PVMT. = PAVEMENT ESMT. = EASEMENT ELEV. = ELEVATION A/C = AIR CONDITIONER E/P = EDGE OF PAVEMENT COR. = CORNER = CENTERLINE D DENOTES DRAINAGE MANHOLE' OHW 'LDEN07ES OVERHEAD W1RE(S) DEN07ES LIGHT POLE DEN07ES 6' WOOD FENCE IC DENOTES IRRIGA77ON CONTROL BOX DENOTES 6' WNLY FENCE V❑ DEN07ES VERIZON U77UTY VAULT (UNLESS 07HERWJSE NOTED) SURVEYORS CER77F7CA770N: CER77FIED AS A BOUNDARY SURVEY UNLESS IT BEARS THE SIGNATURE AND THE ELECTRONIC OR ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER, THIS DRAWING, SKETCH, PLAT OR MAP IS FOR INFORMA 77ONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT VALID. THE SEAL APPEARING ON THIS DOCUMENT WAS AUTHORIZED BY ELIZABE7H KATHLEEN MERTA ON MARCH 24, 2015. ELIZABETH KATHLEEN MERTA, P.S.M. jel,3 LAST DATE OF FIELD WORK: 03/24/2015 FIELD BOOK 1501. PG. 63 F41 11 EMME Land SurveyangLLC'. . L1" ,Ld:; LmU Page 1 of 2 1054 KAPP DRIVE. CLEARWA ME FLORIDA 33765 S E W Y NOT COMPLETE OFF7CE (727) 474-3751, FAX (727) 474-3753 ��� .` CERWIWE OF AUTHORIZA770M LB NO. 7895 —� moi IMME BA GE ema#. emmelandsurmyegma/l.com epi o SEE PAGE 2 FOR APAP OF SURVEY webslt& www. emmelandsurveying.com 40B .NUMBER. 2015069 FOR THE SENEF1 T OF. GEaRGE ALEXANDER SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP ) SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA Radlus = 331.54(S) Arc = 124.36'(C)��T — �--- Chord Bearing = N.6922'50"E.(M) OD ST Chorda 123.63'(M) s�WO—P? �VM 0 ' 26 Asr S.90170'00"W.(M) 116'(P) 116.25(M) DREW STREET 50' ASPH. PVMT. .EMME Larnd Surveying, LLC_ w i. Sk C F-qrl 1054 KAPP DRIV, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33765 r �� QMCE (727) 474-3751, FAX (727) 474-3753,ter Tj CERI1f1CAOF AUMORIZAnOW LB NO. 7895 161D T small: emmelandsurveyOgmall.com website: www.ammelandsurvoying.com LEJ LOT 65 30 0 15 30 SCALE. • 1" = 30' Page 2 of 2 SURVEY NOT COMPLETE lffJ1iQ.UT PAGE 1 S£E PACE 1 FOR LEGAL DESCRIPMOV, LEGEND & N0MS 0 M # F a 269B 270A 1 . y --- F"— ..-yT- td Jo{ } z j L 1 -��Lz'I ' LA .' ... PALMET' S - ..... . ;V .�... v LMEITC _. PYRY f �Y. �Y v �Y LV �v 4 V V k -7 v . . . CR -519 -- - --_ E®m 287B n WALNUT ST � `4`i-T-raTa e,ST��-_�1-r E �_ �_I` 1 {--- � PI`}'a I 13 /. 56 +_r x.•47 - r: it 111tctf ��ii tsf fs°�I i t l - f < X F > X Y k Y l '' J X X < X X X: J% -�%3z ELh7WOOD sT - XxXX Y YXi f! X tXXXX X XX r.x, YfffF x>`X -X X XXX nl In y Y ,k Y >, X a n ti X ��°t x; f ¢_E - T' .1 t_ ii} rf x� �,L \ , >� r r Y k XIX rza '!s r ti1a i - - `Y "(\X,X /�- , s X ,tX, X % X.X X, f tr �I.r;.._ E ;E U( _}._.� X r X X Y X x. XXX y 49an _ I – ;X,X X �C`I XX X x Y,f>YYX <�kttikLL ..I r4' XX XX XX x Ya > k ; x IX{1'X At_- In.. fk i-'3 iJ5IXw..._I / < Y ,X Y Y X! Y - x x X t Y X Y _,� -- _ }-•, .� - 1z 'T• I - _ C X '� i� Y Y f Y t f r X X X t i x X "uanar _ ,'� __.�'-= StMLLtIGO C!R C X Y Y Y .t ..,i ( ,� RCSEMEP.E RG < X �. yv , 1 'L \ t €"'t 3w_ Sze isY; Y- t ti X Y xx Y Y X f X - 1 k ti X 31z _ C. r---•S1E € .rnu 1< k X X 1 7. X X Y Y X a x X X { �__' i l� TI 3 sa--: r -t. €. P X. 7t.3C { ice,} l I i tL X rXt X - �x� X"""X. xk X Y Y _ X Y Y }__ X X> v x X Y X 't n' E-..` I i ars [ Y ---� Y X X - ., X> X> rd Courtay2l 6 y Y r i 30: 1 __t - I 'az ^� 1• _ I i Sa: i ^ 2 sE 1 Y Y Y Xf X r r 7 X Nat i t aid Ins �-' Eo9 e{ la. 4 'o; Ita 1 I --i > r- i ;.. } T[...._T• !\ � ( j,x : •.se �t ,,. ul� c Xk X Citi -.XT { 3'.4 - i i `�_ r }_i ell t - F__ r XY Y ([_' t�3 ` '" .Y X z -`dye" [-a7^/ 9 MAPLE ST :41AP I — — MAPLE ST ., e _ 1 . y --- F"— I r n WALNUT ST � `4`i-T-raTa e,ST��-_�1-r E �_ �_I` 1 {--- � PI`}'a I 13 /. 56 +_r x.•47 - r: it 111tctf ��ii tsf fs°�I i t l - f < X F > X Y k Y l '' J X X < X X X: J% -�%3z ELh7WOOD sT - XxXX Y YXi f! X tXXXX X XX r.x, YfffF x>`X -X X XXX nl In y Y ,k Y >, X a n ti X ��°t x; f ¢_E - T' .1 t_ ii} rf x� �,L \ , >� r r Y k XIX rza '!s r ti1a i - - `Y "(\X,X /�- , s X ,tX, X % X.X X, f tr �I.r;.._ E ;E U( _}._.� X r X X Y X x. XXX y 49an _ I – ;X,X X �C`I XX X x Y,f>YYX <�kttikLL ..I r4' XX XX XX x Ya > k ; x IX{1'X At_- In.. fk i-'3 iJ5IXw..._I / < Y ,X Y Y X! Y - x x X t Y X Y _,� -- _ }-•, .� - 1z 'T• I - _ C X '� i� Y Y f Y t f r X X X t i x X "uanar _ ,'� __.�'-= StMLLtIGO C!R C X Y Y Y .t ..,i ( ,� RCSEMEP.E RG < X �. yv , 1 'L \ t €"'t 3w_ Sze isY; Y- t ti X Y xx Y Y X f X - 1 k ti X 31z _ C. r---•S1E € .rnu 1< k X X 1 7. X X Y Y X a x X X { �__' i l� TI 3 sa--: r -t. €. P X. 7t.3C { ice,} l I i tL X rXt X - �x� X"""X. xk X Y Y _ X Y Y }__ X X> v x X Y X 't n' E-..` I i ars [ Y ---� Y X X - ., X> X> rd Courtay2l 6 y Y r i 30: 1 __t - I 'az ^� 1• _ I i Sa: i ^ 2 sE 1 Y Y Y Xf X r r 7 X Nat i t aid Ins �-' Eo9 e{ la. 4 'o; Ita 1 I --i > r- i ;.. } T[...._T• !\ � ( j,x : •.se �t ,,. ul� c Xk X Citi -.XT { 3'.4 - i i `�_ r }_i ell t - F__ r XY Y ([_' t�3 ` '" .Y X z -`dye" [-a7^/ 9 MAPLE ST :41AP I — — MAPLE ST ., e _ 1 . y --- ' LA e -- - --_ vT7-3-1[ I L -- v �� (�• T _ —_ 5C2 1 tIi �f2 �J } q _' �--€ E iq .:3 + m f 510 = t:a [ .14CARANDA CIF. 'J .. ___t G'T`i 3 87P RD , •._: �� "�t� FOREST'? I W •-_. - 3 - -TAT JACARANDA CIR S _. to u �_- - ♦ l(.-5..- F GB i I 311 E Hr - S _ �-t CRESTrIEWS': le j .. L... .._E `-•a:L...3 DREW.... ST DREW-- 1 . y --- 288A C 3 Z O soy Ser I S .. P,IDGE 000 nl < a h -j I_?_! 'WALNUT i I -�� (1 dWOOD S i i i L_ ` i �.�} }¢r 713E I� 1 y ' t } z'3 O K O LL A ilerwater "'?s U Prepared by: Engineering Department Geographic Technology Division 100 S. Myrtle Ave, Clearwater, FL 33756 Ph: (727)562-4750, Fax: (727)526-4755 www.MyClearwater.com Disclaimer Public information data is furnished by the City of Clearwater Engineering Department, and must be accepted and used by the recipient with the understanding that the data received was collected for the purpose of developing a graphic infrastructure inventory. As such, the City of Clearwater makes no wanrarties, expressed or implied, concernng the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of this data for any other particular use. Furthermore, the City of Clearwater assumes no liability whatsoever associated with the use or misuse of such data. Notice: This map may not I—porate the latest field information. For the most up -to -Me depiction of this infrastructure, consuf the City of Clearwatees GIS Napping Applications at http:llclesrwaterlGISfindex.asp N WE 200 100 0 200 S P—f Legend 1234 Address 123 MHP Lot Number 12345: Subdivision/Condo Number (- Refer to Plat) Block Number U Sub -Parcel Number 3�2 Parcel Number (M&B) Doo Land Hook (Common Ownership) Platted Subdivision Boundary f ' Lot Ownership Line Original Platted Lot Line ------ Trails Building Footprint Unincorporated City Owned Property: vacant Parks & Recreation Area Improved Leasehold CRA Owned HOUSE ATLAS Updated: 6/29/2015 SW 1/4 of 11-29-15 279A LA e vT7-3-1[ _ v MAPLE ST L_ ` i �.�} }¢r 713E I� 1 y ' t } z'3 O K O LL A ilerwater "'?s U Prepared by: Engineering Department Geographic Technology Division 100 S. Myrtle Ave, Clearwater, FL 33756 Ph: (727)562-4750, Fax: (727)526-4755 www.MyClearwater.com Disclaimer Public information data is furnished by the City of Clearwater Engineering Department, and must be accepted and used by the recipient with the understanding that the data received was collected for the purpose of developing a graphic infrastructure inventory. As such, the City of Clearwater makes no wanrarties, expressed or implied, concernng the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of this data for any other particular use. Furthermore, the City of Clearwater assumes no liability whatsoever associated with the use or misuse of such data. Notice: This map may not I—porate the latest field information. For the most up -to -Me depiction of this infrastructure, consuf the City of Clearwatees GIS Napping Applications at http:llclesrwaterlGISfindex.asp N WE 200 100 0 200 S P—f Legend 1234 Address 123 MHP Lot Number 12345: Subdivision/Condo Number (- Refer to Plat) Block Number U Sub -Parcel Number 3�2 Parcel Number (M&B) Doo Land Hook (Common Ownership) Platted Subdivision Boundary f ' Lot Ownership Line Original Platted Lot Line ------ Trails Building Footprint Unincorporated City Owned Property: vacant Parks & Recreation Area Improved Leasehold CRA Owned HOUSE ATLAS Updated: 6/29/2015 SW 1/4 of 11-29-15 279A 2.3.3.1 RESIDENTIAL CLASSIFICATION/LOW DENSITY RANGE — CONT'D. 2.3.3.1.5 Category/Svmbol — Residential Urban (RU). Purpose — It is the purpose of this category to depict those areas of the county that are now developed, or appropriate to be developed, in an urban low density residential manner; and to recognize such areas as primarily well-suited for residential uses that are consistent with the urban qualities and natural resource characteristics of such areas. Use Characteristics — Those uses appropriate to and consistent with this category include: • Primary Uses — Residential • Secondary Uses — Residential Equivalent; Institutional; Transportation/Utility; Public Educational Facility; Ancillary Nonresidential; Recreation/Open Space; Agricultural Locational Characteristics — This category is generally appropriate to locations removed from, but in proximity to urban activity centers; in areas where use and development characteristics are urban residential in nature; and in areas serving as a transition between more suburban and more urban residential areas. These areas are generally served by and accessed from minor and collector roadways which connect to the arterial and thoroughfare highway network. Traffic Generation Characteristics — The standard for the purpose of calculating typical traffic impacts relative to an amendment for this category shall be 68 trips per day per acre. Density/Intensity Standards — Shall include the following: • Residential Use — Shall not exceed seven and one-half (7.5) dwelling units per acre. • Residential Equivalent Use — Shall not exceed an equivalent of 2.0 to 3.0 beds per permitted dwelling unit at 7.5 dwelling units per acre. The standard for the purpose of establishing relative intensity and potential impacts shall be the equivalent of 2.5 beds per dwelling unit. • Nonresidential Use — Shall not exceed a floor area ratio (FAR) of .40, nor an impervious surface ratio (ISR) of .65. The standard for the purpose of establishing relative intensity and potential impacts shall be a FAR of .24 and an ISR of .50. Other Standards — Shall include the following: • Acreage Limitations — The following uses shall not exceed the respective acreage threshold designated for such uses. Any such use, alone or when added to existing contiguous like use(s), which exceeds the designated threshold shall require a plan map amendment that shall include such use and all contiguous like uses: 1. Ancillary Nonresidential; Transportation/Utility Use — Shall not exceed a maximum area of three (3) acres. 2. Institutional Use (except Public Educational Facilities which are not subject to this threshold) — Shall not exceed a maximum area of five (5) acres. Countywide Plan Rules 2-9 July 21, 2014 20 0 10 20 A SCALE.• I"= 20' 000 A 4. -'4 05 e. A A :q A 4-4 4A A. BATH FAMIL Y [DINING u KITCHEN LIVING BATH BED BED BED Page 3 of 7 203 N. GL, ENWO ODA VENUE SITE PLAN AND EXISTING CL EA R WA TER, FLORIDA 33 765 UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A. BED Page 3 of 7 203 N. GL, ENWO ODA VENUE SITE PLAN AND EXISTING CL EA R WA TER, FLORIDA 33 765 UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN Clearwater, FL Community' elopment Code Page 1 of 3 Section 4-202. - Applications for development approval. A. All applications for development approval shall include the following information in addition to the information that the community development coordinator may generally require unless waived or modified by the community development coordinator: 1. An application with plans and relevant support materials (the number to be established by the community development coordinator). 2. Data sheet. 3. Written responses (or narrative) explaining how compliance with the general applicability criteria and applicable flexibility criteria is being achieved by the development proposal. 4. Affidavit to authorize agent/representative. 5. If the application would result in the removal or relocation of mobile home owners residing in a mobile home park as provided in F.S. § 723.083, the application must provide information sufficient to show that adequate mobile home parks or other suitable facilities exist for the relocation of the mobile home owners. Mobile home owners shall be defined as those persons who own their coach but rent a lot space within the subject property and are subject to the provisions and protections provided for in F.S. Ch. 723. The application shall include the following information: a. The total number of mobile homes in the park that are owned by mobile homeowners; and b. Monthly rent charged for each space occupied by a mobile home owner; and c. A list of the names and mailing addresses of the present mobile home owners within the subject property. This list should identify those units that are suitable for moving and for which only vacant replacement lots will be identified; and d. Household profile for each owner -occupied mobile home within the park, including number of adults, number of children, and whether pets have been allowed in the park. Replacement units identified should be suitable for similar household profiles; and e. A list of other mobile home parks or other suitable facilities with vacant units available at the time of application that are of a similar cost profile to which owners residing in the subject property could reasonably expect to relocate. This list will include, at a minimum, name and address of the park, park contact name and phone number, the number of vacant spaces available and the cost of those spaces, park guidelines on age and condition of acceptable units, number of rental units available and the cost of those rentals. All parks or other suitable facilities must be located within a ten -mile radius of the subject property and serve the same age, household, and occupancy profiles as the subject property. f. Any other information that the applicant deems necessary to demonstrate that adequate mobile home parks or other suitable facilities exist for the relocation of the mobile home owners. B. about:blank 8/5/2015 Clearwater, FL Community' elopment Code Page 2 of 3 v Simultaneous applications. If more than one approval is required (for example, Level One and Level Three) for a particular development proposal, with the exception of an application for a building permit, certificate of occupancy or business tax receipt, an applicant is required to submit all applications for development approval at the same time. C. Determination of completeness. 1. Determination of completeness. Within seven working days after the published application deadline, the community development coordinator shall determine whether an application is complete. a. Application complete. If the community development coordinator determines that the application is complete, he shall notify the applicant in writing that the application has been accepted for filing. b. Notice to abutting property owners. When the community development coordinator has accepted an application for level one approval (flexible standard development) for filing, he shall immediately notify the owners of the property within 200 feet of the property, excluding any water bodies within that distance, which is the subject of the application and any affected neighborhood association and any citywide neighborhood association in writing that an application has been filed, the nature of the approval requested and the procedure for consideration of the application, as well as the right of the owner to appeal a decision. c. Application not complete. If the community development coordinator determines that the application is not complete, he shall notify the applicant, specifying the deficiencies of the application. No further development review shall be taken by the community development coordinator until the deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. 2. Determination of legal sufficiency. Level one (minimum standard development). Within five working days after a determination that a level one (minimum development standards) application is complete, the community development coordinator shall determine whether the application is legally sufficient, that is whether the required application materials have been prepared in a substantively competent manner. If the community development coordinator determines that any portion of the application is insufficient, the community development coordinator shall notify the applicant of the reasons that the application is legally insufficient, that the application is deemed withdrawn and no further development review shall be conducted until the application is resubmitted. Such notification shall constitute an administrative decision which may be appealed to the community development board pursuant to Section 4-501(A)(2). 3. Determination of legal sufficiency. Level One (flexible standard development), Level Two or Level Three approvals. Within 18 working days after a determination that the application is complete, the members of the development review committee in the case of Level One (flexible standard development), Level Two or Level Three approvals shall determine whether the application is legally sufficient, that is whether the required application materials have been prepared in a substantively competent manner. If any member of the development review committee determines that any portion of the application is insufficient, the community development coordinator shall notify the applicant of the reasons that the application is legally insufficient, that the application is deemed withdrawn and no further development review shall be about:blank 8/5/2015 .J Clearwater, FL Community ' 'elopment Code Page 3 of 3 conducted until the application is resubmitted. Such notification shall constitute an administrative decision which may be appealed to the community development board pursuant to Section 4-501(A)(2). D. Review by development review committee. After an application for development approval is determined to be complete and legally sufficient, the development review committee shall review the application in accordance with Division 3 of this Article if a Level One approval, Division 4 if a Level Two approval and Division 6 if a Level Three approval. E. Issuance of development order. The community development coordinator shall issue a development order for Level One (flexible standard) approval. F. Fees. Except for those applications submitted on behalf of governmental agencies, all applications for development approval shall be accompanied by the payment of a fee established from time -to - time by the city commission and maintained as Appendix A to the City Code. G. Resubmission of application affecting same property. No application shall be accepted during the following time periods after the denial of a substantially similar application affecting the same property or any portion thereof: a. Nine months for Level Two approvals. b. Twelve months for Level Three approvals. 2. The time periods specified in this subsection shall be deemed to have commenced only after the completion of any administrative or judicial review which may have been sought. (Ord. No. 6526-00, § 1, 6-15-00; Ord. No. 6928-02, §§ 94-97, 5-2-02; Ord. No. 6998-02, § 1, 7-18-02; Ord. No. 7106-03, §§ 12-14, 9-18-03; Ord. No. 7449-05, §§ 27-30,12-15-05; Ord. No. 7616-06, § 2, 5-18-06; Ord. No. 7725-07, § 2, 2-15-07; Ord. No. 7835-07, § 20,1-17-08; Ord. No. 8042-09, § 4, 6-4-09; Ord. No. 8310-12, § 5, 2-2-12) about:blank 8/5/2015 �p3 sJ 61k,wa� U �t J--) g--., / rL) To the best of your knowledge, do your records show any unresolved zoning code violations? Yes, there are open violations on file in our records. (See attached list and/or copies/cases) No, there are no open violations on file in our records. *Please note, this request is for open violations of which you are aware. PZR is not requesting an inspection be made. To the best of your knowledge, do your records show any unresolved building code violations and/or complaints? 0 Yes, there are open violations on file in our records. (See attached list and/or copies/cases) No, there are no open violations on file in our records. *Please note, this request is for open violations of which you are aware. PZR is not requesting an inspection be made. Please call the undersigned at extension if you have questions or concerns. Sincerely: Name: Title: Department: Email: Hauck -Baker, Melissa From: Matzke, Lauren Sent: Monday, August 17, 2015 10:27 AM To: Hauck -Baker, Melissa Subject: RE: 203 N. Glenwood Avenue — FLD2015-06021 Under the updated Countywide Rules (still technically not effective, but will be soon), this property would be within the Residential Low Medium (RLM) future land use designation. RLM allows a density of up to 10 units per acre. Part of the guidance from the Special Act (2012) which authorized the rewriting of the Countywide Rules was to focus on issues deemed to have impact countywide, and as such, the Map / Categories are broader in nature and future -oriented. The Rules are clear, however, that the authority remains with the local governments to determine the appropriate density and intensity for parcels within their jurisdictions (pasting below). The allowable densities/intensities for the land use categories defined by the City are contained within the City's Comprehensive Plan. As of now, the City does not plan to amend the various categories' established development potentials. So, although a parcel may now be categorized as RLM on the Countywide Map, the future land use category assigned by the City may be more restrictive and still meet the consistency requirements within the CW Rules. The new Rules require each jurisdiction to include a table in the FLUE to show which local future land use categories correspond to the Countywide Plan Map categories. The City is in the process of amending the Comprehensive Plan to address this requirement (drafted). SEC. 2.3.3 COUNTYWIDE PLAN MAP CATEGORIES. The Countywide Plan Map categories, symbols and the purpose, use characteristics, locational characteristics, traffic generation characteristics, density/intensity standards and other standards shall be as set forth for each of the following categories. Within the framework provided by these standards, local governments shall have the authority to determine appropriate density and intensity standards for parcels within their jurisdictions. Local plans and regulations may be more restrictive, in accordance with the local government consistency provisions of Article 3, and should be consulted for authorized uses and applicable standards. From: Hauck -Baker, Melissa Sent: Monday, August 17, 2015 8:55 AM To: Matzke, Lauren Subject: FW: 203 N. Glenwood Avenue — FLD2015-06021 Good Morning Lauren, I took a look at the Countywide rules and as the subject property is in our LMDR and previously RU, I am not sure which new Countywide residential classification will apply. Could you please help me with this? Thanks, Melissa Hauck -Baker, AICP, PP Senior Planner Planning & Development Department City of Clearwater 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 T: (727)562-4567 x2855 E: melissa.hauck-baker@mvclearwater.com Hours of Operation Monday -Friday: Sam - 4:30pm Customer Service Hours Monday, Tuesday, Thursday, Friday: 8am-4:30pm Wednesday 8am-2:30pm From: Delk, Michael Sent: Friday, August 14, 2015 5:24 PM To: Hauck -Baker, Melissa Subject: FW: 203 N. Glenwood Avenue — FLD2015-06021 Melissa — Let's discuss this. I'm sure I'll be responding again. Michael From: Delk, Michael Sent: Friday, August 14, 2015 5:23 PM To: 'Ellis Curry' Subject: RE: 203 N. Glenwood Avenue — FLD2015-06021 Mr. Curry — As indicated, we'll confirm status of recent changes to the rules the City is governed by. It is not anticipated we will amend our position on the non-compliance of multiple units. Michael L. Delk, AICP Planning and Development Director City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Clearwater, FL 33756 P.O. Box 4748, 33758-4748 727-562-4561 727-562-4865 (fax) From: Ellis Curry [mailto:cuellcu( )aol.com] Sent: Friday, August 14, 2015 2:44 PM To: Delk, Michael Subject: Re: 203 N. Glenwood Avenue — FLD2015-06021 Dear Mr. Delk, I realize that you have said that Allowable density is not subject to flexibility criteria but again could you please address how it is that allowable density is specifically subject to flexibility criteria in the code for residential infill projects? This is the part that has not been addressed. The code appears to be self contradictory because the Flexibility Criteria E specifically for residential infill projects specifically allows for deviations from one or more of the following: intensity; other development standards. And this is preceded by Table 2-204. "LMDR" District Flexible Development, Residential Infill Projects note (2) stating: The development standards for residential infill projects are GUIDELINES AND MAY BE VARIED based on the criteria specified in Section 2-204(E). Could you please explain how allowable density is both specifically allowed for residential infill but then supposedly not allowed? It appears that you could just as well decide that county -wide rules do allow this and that it is consistent with the land development regulations of the City and appropriate for this location. Thank you, Ellis Curry -----Original Message ----- From: michael.delk<michael.delk(a)MyClearwater.com> To: cuellcu <cuellcu(o)aol.com> Cc: Terry.Teunis <Terry. Te u n is(cDmyclearwater. com>; Matthew.Smith <Matthew. Smith(a)MyClearwater.com>; Robert.Tefft <Robert.Tefft(aMyClea rwater.com> Sent: Fri, Aug 14, 2015 12:02 pm Subject: RE: 203 N. Glenwood Avenue — FLD2015-06021 Mr. Curry: In talking with staff, I am advised that the size of the parcel would accommodate only 2 units under the county -wide rules. This is based on property survey acreages submitted to us. In that case, we do not have flexibility to exceed county -wide rule limitations. There have been some recent changes in the county -wide rules and staff will check that to make sure there are no changes that would affect that number. Regardless and notwithstanding the potential for either two or three units, we believe this area to be zoned for and suitable for single family dwellings: The use of this parcel for multiple dwelling units has been alleged in the past. We have documentation specific to this property by previous owner/occupants asserting without question that this structure was utilized exclusively as a single family dwelling. That is what is allowed. As such, we believe multiple units is both inconsistent with the land development regulations of the City and inappropriate for this location. Therefore, we will not support approval of a multiple attached dwellings at this location. Existence of multiple units as you indicate exists may be ground for code enforcement action. Michael L. Delk, AICP Planning and Development Director City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Clearwater, FL 33756 P.O. Box 4748, 33758-4748 727-562-4561 727-562-4865 (fax) From: Ellis Curry [mailto:cuellcuCcbaol.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 7:27 AM To: Delk, Michael Subject: Re: 203 N. Glenwood Avenue — FLD2015-06021 Dear Mr. Delk, Thank you for your reply; I appreciate your assistance. You commented that due to the size of the parcel, the site cannot accommodate three units so I just wanted to make sure you understand that this is an existing condition; the site already accommodates these units and has for decades and we had already been told at the onset by Mr. Jackson at the City of Clearwater that 3 units were allowed on this property (let me know if you need his email); this is the reason we went through the effort and expense of making this application. We were simply trying to accommodate the City and formalize 3 existing attached units that have been operated for more than 60 years. As you can imagine we are starting to feel a little ambushed for what was supposed to be simply formalizing an existing condition. I don't even think this flexibility code was intended to apply to this situation in the first place.These unit limits are typically intended for larger new construction and don't really work when applied to an existing small site. We thought that you all were able to acknowledge and accommodate these special circumstances. We are simply trying to continue in the same manner; operating peacefully and compatibly within the neighborhood as they always have. You also said that Allowable density is not subject to flexibility criteria but again the Flexibility Criteria E specifically for residential infill projects specifically allows for deviations from one or more of the following: intensity; other development standards. And this is preceded by Table 2-204. "LMDR" District Flexible Development, Residential Infill Projects note (2) stating: The development standards for residential infill projects are GUIDELINES AND MAY BE VARIED based on the criteria specified in Section 2-204(E). So, as I previously noted, allowable density is specifically subject to flexibility criteria. Is the code self contradictory or why is it specifically saying intensity is subject to flexible criteria for residential infill? Please let me know today as soon as possible. Thank you, Ellis Curry -----Original Message ----- From: michael.delk<michael.delk(cDMyClearwater.com> To: cuellcu <cuellcu .aol.com> Cc: Melissa. Hauck -Baker <Melissa.Hauck-BakeO( MyClearwater.com> Sent: Mon, Aug 10, 2015 2:49 pm Subject: RE: 203 N. Glenwood Avenue — FLD2015-06021 Mr. Curry — In short, due to the size of the parcel, the site cannot accommodate three units. Allowable density is not subject to flexibility criteria. The site can only accommodate two units. Michael L. Delk, AICP Planning and Development Director City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Clearwater, FL 33756 P.O. Box 4748, 33758-4748 727-562-4561 727-562-4865 (fax) From: Ellis Curry [mailto:cuellcuC&aol.com] Sent: Monday, August 10, 2015 7:35 AM To: Delk, Michael Subject: Re: 203 N. Glenwood Avenue — FLD2015-06021 Dear Mr. Delk, In your sixth bullet you note that Pursuant to Section 3-902.A., CDC NOTWOTHSTANDING any provision in Article 2 of this CDC. Article 2 of this CDC, Section 2-204. - Flexible development, Flexibility Criteria, E. Residential infill projects 1. states: 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from one or more of the following: intensity; other development standards; So pursuant to Article 2 of this CDC, Section 2-204. - Flexible development, Flexibility Criteria, E. Residential infill projects item 1 deviations from intensity may be granted and it is possible for this application to be approved. This is one of the exceptions to this rule and is what we described in our responses to the Flexibility criteria including item 1 and 7 in our application. It is also noted that Table 2-204. "LMDR" District Flexible Development, Residential Infill Projects note (2) states: The development standards for residential infill projects are GUIDELINES AND MAY BE VARIED based on the criteria specified in Section 2-204(E). Your determination did not specifically address the exceptions provided by Section 3-902.A and requested by us. Would you please reply today and provide the specific reasons for why our application is being denied these specific deviations in intensity as requested and allowed by the CDC as noted above? Thank you, Ellis Curry P Goals, Obiectives and Policies Future Land Use approved by the Engineering Department and/or City Council, and in coordination with the Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD). A.1.1.9 The effects of erosion shall be carefully controlled through local permitting and construction standards, procedures and regulations, and through the development of local and regional erosion control management programs. A.1.1.10 The Community Development Code shall provide for on-site drainage detention and/or retention or payment in lieu thereof for compatibility with community master drainage plans. A.1.2 Objective — Population densities in the coastal storm areas are restricted to the maximum density allowed by the Countywide Future Land Use Designation of the property, except for specific areas identified in Beach by Design: A Preliminary Design for Clearwater Beach and Design Guidelines, in which case densities identified in Beach by Design shall govern. All densities in the coastal storm area and shall be consistent with the Pinellas County Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan and the Regional Hurricane Evacuation Study. Policies A.1.2.1 The City shall require new or redeveloped overnight accommodations uses located within the City's coastal storm area to have a hurricane evacuation plan, approved by the City, for all guests. This plan shall require the commencement of evacuation of hotel guests as soon as a hurricane watch is posted for the City. A.1.2.2 Continue to cooperate with the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council and Pinellas County to meet the regional objectives for evacuation of permanent populations as well as other emergency concerns. A.2 GOAL — A SUFFICIENT VARIETY AND AMOUNT OF FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORIES SHALL BE PROVIDED TO ACCOMMODATE PUBLIC DEMAND AND PROMOTE INFILL DEVELOPMENT. A.2.1 Objective — Public institutions, such as hospitals, parks, utility facilities and government facilities, shall be provided sufficient land area to accommodate identified public needs. Policies A.2.1.1 Utility facilities shall continue to be allowed in all City of Clearwater land use categories and zoning districts consistent with City regulations. A.2.1.2 Growth of Morton Plant hospital shall continue to be consistent with the Morton Plant Hospital Master Plan. A.2.2 Objective — Future Land Use in the City of Clearwater shall be guided by the Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map and implemented through the City's Community Development Code. Map categories are further defined in Policy #A.2.2.1 below. Policies A.2.2.1 Land Uses on the Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map shall generally be interpreted as indicated in the following table. The intensity standards listed in the table (FAR — floor area ratio; ISR — impervious surface ratio) are the maximum allowed for each plan category, except where otherwise permitted by special area plans or redevelopment plans approved by the City Council. Consequently, A-4 Goals. Objectives and Policies Future Land Use individual zoning districts, as established by the City's Community Development Code, may have more stringent intensity standards than those listed in the table but will not exceed the maximum allowable intensity of the plan category, unless otherwise permitted by approved special area plans or redevelopment plans. (REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK) A-5 Goals, Objectives and Policies Future Land Use PLAN PRIMARY USES PER CLASSIFICATION PLAN CATEGORY MAX. DENSITY / INTENSITY PER PLAN CATEGORY CONSISTENT ZONING DISTRICTS Residential Estate Very Low Density I Dwelling Unit Per Acre; FAR 0.30; ISR 0.60 Low Density Residential (LDR) RE Residential Residential Suburban Low Density Residential 2.5 Dwelling Units Per Acre; FAR 0.30; ISR 0.60 Low Density Residential (LDR) RS Residential Low Low Density Residential 5 Dwelling Units Per Acre; FAR 0.40; ISR 0.65 Low Density Residential (LDR); RL Low Medium Density Residential LMDR Residential Urban Urban Low Density 7.5 Dwelling Units Per Acre; FAR 0.40; ISR 0.65 Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR); RU Residential Medium Density Residential MDR Residential Low Medium Low to Moderate Density 10 Dwelling Units Per Acre; FAR 0.50; ISR 0.75 Mobile Home Park (MHP); RLM Residential Medium Density Residential MDR Residential Medium Moderate to High Density 15 Dwelling Units Per Acre; FAR 0.50; ISR 0.75 Medium Density Residential (MDR); RM Residential Medium High Density Residential MHDR Residential High High Density Residential 30 Dwelling Units Per Acre; FAR 0.60; ISR 0.85 Medium High Density Residential (MHDR); RH High Density Residential HDR 30 Dwelling Units Per Acre; FAR 1.2; ISR 0.95; 50 Overnight Accommodation Units Per Acre; FAR 1.2; ISR 0.95 Base Overnight Accommodations: Less 0 Units Per Acre; FAR 2.0; ISR Than 1 Acre(Alternative) .95 Overnight Accommodations: Between 0 Units Per Acre; FAR 3.0; ISR Resort Facilities High High Density Tourist (T); (�H) ResidentiallOvernight 1 and 3 Acres Alternative •95 High Density Residential (HDR); Accommodations Commercial (C) Overnight 110 Units Per Acre; FAR 4.0; Accommodations: Greater SR 0.95 Than 3 Acres(Alternative) Or as set forth in Beach by Design: A Preliminary Design for Clearwater Beach and Design Guidelines, the special area plan governing Clearwater Beach adopted by Ord. No. 6689- 01 and as amended. Residential/Office Limited Low Density Office (0); (R/OL) Residential/Office 7.5 Dwelling Units Per Acre; FAR 0.40; ISR 0.75 Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) Residential/Office General Medium Density 15 Dwelling Units Per Acre; FAR 0.50; ISR 0.75 Office (0); (R/OG) Residential/Office Medium Density Residential MDR Central Business District Residential; Office; Retail; As set forth in the approved Redevelopment Plan I Downtown D A-6 Goals. Obiectives and Policies Future Land Use PLAN PRIMARY USES PER CLASSIFICATION PLAN CATEGORY MAX. DENSITY / INTENSITY PER PLAN CATEGORY CONSISTENT ZONING DISTRICTS (CBD) Public/Semi-Public Uses as indicated in approved Redevelo ment Plan Transit Oriented Minimum and Maximum Intensity Development (TOD) FAR 3.0-10.0 (40-100 Dwelling Units Per Acre) within 1/8 Transit Station Residential; Office; Retail; mile radius of the transit station Area Type I: Urban Institutional; Public/Semi- Transit Oriented Development" FAR 1.5-7.0 (40-100 Dwelling Units Per Acre) between 1/8 Center Downtown Public mile radius of the transit station and the station area boundary Transit Station Residential; Office; Retail; Area Type II: Institutional; Public/Semi- FAR 0.5-5.0 (30-50 Dwelling Units Per Acre) Transit Oriented Development" Suburban Center Public Transit Station Residential; Office; Retail; Area Type III: Institutional; Public/Semi- FAR 0.5-3.0 (10-20 Dwelling Units Per Acre) Transit Oriented Development" Neighborhood Public Center Transit Station Residential; Office; Retail; Area Type IV: Complete Street Institutional; Public/Semi- FAR 0.5-2.0 (10-20 Dwelling Units Per Acre) Transit Oriented Development" Corridor Public Residential; Residential 18 Dwelling Units Per Acre; FAR 0.40; ISR 0.85 Office (0); Residential/Office/Retail Equivalent; Office; Retail; (R/O/R) Overnight accommodation; Commercial (C); Personal/Business Services 30 Overnight Accommodation Units Per Acre; FAR 0.40; ISR Medium Density Residential (MDR) 0.85 Commercial Neighborhood Office; Retail; Personal Commercial (C); (CN) Service 10 Dwelling Units Per Acre; FAR 0.40; ISR 0.80 Office (0) Office; Retail; Overnight 18 Dwelling Units Per Acre; FAR 0.45; ISR 0.85 Commercial Limited (CL) Accommodations; Personal Commercial (C); Office (0) 30 Overnight Accommodation Units Per Acre; FAR 0.45; IS Service 0.85 A-7 Goals, Objectives and Policies Future Land Use PLAN CLASSIFICATION PRIMARY USES PER PLAN CATEGORY MAX. DENSITY / INTENSITY PER PLAN CATEGORY CONSISTENT ZONING DISTRICTS Office; Retail; Personal 24 Dwelling Units Per Acre; FAR 0.55; ISR 0.90 Commercial General Service; Overnight Commercial (C); 40 Overnight Accommodation Units Per Acre; FAR 0.55; ISR (CG) Accommodations; Office (0) Wholesale; Warehouse 0.90 FAR 0.65; ISR 0.85 50 Overnight Accommodation Units Per Acre: FAR 0.65; ISR Light Manufacturing; Industrial Limited Overnight Accommodations; 0.85 [Subject to Master Development Plan requirements in (IL) Research/Development; Section 2.3.3.6.1 of the Countywide Plan Rules] (Base Industrial, Research and Technology (IRT) 75 Overnight Accommodation Units Per Acre; FAR 1.5; ISR Wholesale; Warehouse 0.85 [Subject to Master Development Plan requirements in Section 2.3.3.6.1 of the Countywide Plan Rules] (Alternative) Light and/or Heavy Industrial General Manufacturing; Wholesale; (IG) Warehouse; FAR 0.75; ISR 0.95 Industrial, Research and Technology (IRT) Research/Development; Vehicular Salvage Recreation/Open Space Public/Private Open Space (R/OS) and/or Recreation Facility; FAR 0.25; ISR 0.60 Open Space/Recreation (OS/R) Beach/Water Access Preservation Natural/Undeveloped Water FAR 0.10; 1 S 0.20 Preservation (P) P Features; Beaches and Dunes Public/Private Schools; 12.5 Dwelling Units Per Acre; FAR 0.65; ISR 0.85; Hospital Institutional Churches; Public Offices; Bonus Provision FAR 1.0 Subject to Bonus Provisions Institutional (I) (1) Hospitals Provided Below Transportation/Utility (T/U) Airports; Marina; Utility Facilities FAR 0.70; ISR 0.90 Institutional (I) Transportation/Utility (T/U) Utility transmission line FAR and ISR based on underlying plan classification; All categories Overlay located in an easement applicable to properties ten 10 acres or less in area Water Body and/or Drainage Submerged land; drainage feature (other than as an overlay) - Water/Drainage Feature(s) Features No density/intensity allocation; for water bodies, applicable to All categories those of three 3 or more acres in area Drainage Feature Overlay Drainage features Density, FAR and ISR based on the underlying plan All categories classification A-8 Goals. Obiectives and Policies Future Land Use Notes: * The Transit Oriented Development (TOD) categories are assigned a minimum and maximum intensity standards measured in terms of floor area ratio (FAR) and inclusive of residential and non-residential square footage. If a development has a residential component, the residential use shall be limited to the dwelling units per acre ranges specified for each TOD category. Development intensity shall be greatest within a core of approximately 1/8" mile from the center of the transit station area and transition to lower intensities with increasing distance from the center. ** The general term for the zoning district "Transit Oriented Development' will be used until the station locations arc determined and transit station arca plans are developed, at which time the zoning district will be specific to the geographic location of the transit station area. *** FAR bonus provisions for hospital uses in the Institutional classification: 1. Hospital uses must be based on and subject to an approved final master plan or site plan; and The master plan or site plan must include any and all adjacent, contiguous, or touching property, structures, facilities, and uses, which are: a. Attributable to common ownership; or b. Part of a common plan of operation, administration, promotion, advertising, service, or business; or c. Voluntarily sharing facilities or infrastructure; or d. Used in any way in conjunction with the hospital use; and Where the municipal boundary of any adjoining local government is contiguous to or within 150 feet of the hospital use, the provisions set forth hereunder shall apply. The City shall approve the final master or site plan or any amendment thereto, subject to the following specific provisions: a. The hospital use shall not exceed a FAR of 0.65 for the uses located within 150 feet of a municipal boundary of adjoining local government(s); b. Adjoining local government(s) shall be given an opportunity to review and comment on the master plan or site plan, or any amendment thereto, as it applies to the property within 150 feet of the municipal boundary. This shall include the following: 1) Transmittal of two copies of the master plan or site plan or any amendment thereto, to the adjoining local govemment(s) not less than 30 days prior to scheduled action by the City; 2) The opportunity and specific process by which to provide comments and recommendations by the adjoining local government(s) so as to be timely and meaningfully considered by the City. c. Any proposed use within 150 feet of adjoining local govcmmcnt(s) shall be so designed and located as to consider specifically each of the following: 1) The height of any building or structure in relationship to the distance form adjoining property and buildings in the adjoining jurisdiction(s) to ensure minimum negative visual impact based on the standards for setback, separation distance and buffering in the adjoining local government(s). 2) The separation distance and landscape buffer provisions for any vehicular use, storage, or service area or structure, consistent with the character and use of the adjoining property based on the standards for such buffer area in the adjoining local government(s). 3) The landscape treatment, including the type, size and intensity of vegetative buffer areas consistent with the character and use of the adjoining property based on the standards for such landscape treatment in the adjoining local government(s). 4) That no use shall constitute a nuisance with respect to noise, odor, air quality, fire or explosive hazard, vibration or electromagnetic interference based on the performance standards in the adjoining local government(s). A-9 Goals, Objectives and Policies Future Land Use A.2.2.2 Residential land uses shall be sited on well -drained soils, in proximity to parks, schools, mass transit and other neighborhood -serving land uses. A.2.2.3 Commercial land uses shall be located at the intersection of arterial or collector streets and should be sited in such a way as to minimize the intrusion of off-site impacts into residential neighborhoods. New plats and site plans shall discourage the creation of "strip commercial' zones by insuring that adequate lot depths are maintained and by zoning for commercial development at major intersections. A.2.2.4 Industrial land uses shall be located along arterial or major collector streets, with rail access if possible. Siting and operation of industrial land uses should not create adverse off-site impacts, particularly as these off-site impacts may degrade residential areas. A.2.2.5 Subdivision of land shall be consistent with and governed by the Comprehensive Plan objectives and policies regarding land use, transportation, conservation, and utility services. A.2.2.6 The Community Development Code shall provide for safe on-site traffic circulation and connections to adjacent arterial and collector streets consistent with Florida Department of Transportation and Institute of Traffic Engineers design guidelines. A.2.2.7 The City will provide density bonuses for affordable housing developments that demonstrate that a minimum of 15% of the total units are reserved as affordable housing units. Such bonuses shall not exceed 50% of the density permitted by the Future Land Use Map and shall not include properties located in the Coastal Storm Area. The density bonus shall be established by ordinance in the Community Development Code. A.2.2.8 All land use categories on the Future Land Use Map shall be consistent with the density and intensity standards and other standards contained in the Pinellas Planning Council Countywide Plan Rules, including criteria and standards for nomenclature, continuum of plan classifications and categories, use and locational characteristics, map delineation, other standards, and special rules. A.3 GOAL - THE CITY OF CLEARWATER SHALL ENSURE THAT ALL DEVELOPMENT OR REDEVELOPMENT INITIATIVES MEET THE SAFETY, ENVIRONMENTAL, AND AESTHETIC NEEDS OF THE CITY THROUGH CONSISTENT IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE. A.3.1 Objective — All signage within the City of Clearwater shall be consistent with the Clearwater sign code, as found within the Community Development Code, and all proposed signs shall be evaluated to determine their effectiveness in reducing visual clutter and in enhancing the safety and attractiveness of the streetscape. Policies A.3.1.1 Commercial signs in Clearwater shall be restricted to discourage the proliferation of visual clutter, promote community aesthetics, provide for highway safety, and to allow the identification of business locations. A.3.1.2 Proliferation of billboards along major collector and arterial streets shall be prevented as is currently provided. A-10 Hauck -Baker, Melissa From: Hauck -Baker, Melissa Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2015 9:39 AM To: 'Ellis Curry' Subject: 203 N Glenwood Mr. Curry, I have been directed by my Supervisor, Robert Tefft, to contact you regarding the submitted application for the case FLD2015-06021 at 203 N. Glenwood Avenue. The subject property is located within the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District and the density as established by Pinellas County is 7.5 dwelling units per acre. A three unit residential development would require a minimum lot size of 17,424 square feet and the subject property is 16,244 square feet. As the property is not large enough to accommodate the density staff is unable to support the application. We are contacting you at this point in order for you to have the opportunity to formally Withdraw the application and be refunded the submitted fees. Please let me know if you would like to discuss further and I am happy to provide you with any assistance possible. Thank you, Melissa Hauck -Baker, AICP, PP Planner II Planning & Development Department City of Clearwater 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 T: (727)562-4567 x2855 melissa.hauck-baker@myclearwater.com Hours of Operation Monday -Friday: 8am - 4:30pm Customer Service Hours Monday, Tuesday, Thursday, Friday: 8am-4:30pm Wednesday 8am-2:30pm Clearwater, FL Community De—lopment Code Page 1 of 5 DIVISION 2. - LOW MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT ("LMDR") Section 2-201. - Intent and purpose. The intent and purpose of the Low Medium Density Residential District ("LMDR") is to protect and preserve the integrity and value of existing, stable residential neighborhoods of low to medium density while at the same time, allowing a careful and deliberate redevelopment and revitalization of such neighborhoods in need of revitalization or neighborhoods with unique amenities which create unique opportunities to increase property values and the overall attractiveness of the City. Section 2-201.1. - Maximum development potential. The Low Medium Density Residential District ("LMDR") may be located in more than one land use category. It is the intent of the LMDR District that development be consistent with the Countywide Future Land Use Plan as required by State law. The uses and development potential of a parcel of land within the LMDR District shall be determined by the standards found in this Development Code as well as the Countywide Future Land Use Designation of the property, including any acreage or floor area restrictions set forth in the Rules Concerning the Administration of the Countywide Future Land Use Plan, as amended from time to time. Development potential for the Countywide Future Land Use Designations that apply to the LMDR District are as follows: ... _ . .............. .. ............ ..... Countywide Future Maximum Dwelling Units per Acre of Maximum Floor Land Use Land Area Ratio/Imper- Designation vious Surface Ratio Residential Low 5 dwelling units per acre FAR .40/ISR .65 Residential Urban 7.5 dwelling units per acre FAR .40/ISR .65 (Ord. No. 6526-00, § 1, 6-15-00; Ord. No. 7449-05, § 3,12-15-05; Ord. No. 8043-09, § 4, 9-3-09) Section 2-202. - Minimum standard development. The following uses are Level One permitted uses in the LMDR District subject to the minimum standards set out in this section and other applicable provisions of Article 3. Table 2-202. "LMDR" District Minimum Standard Development Use Min. Min. Lot Width Lot (ft.) Size (sq. ft.) Community Gardens n/a n/a Community Residential Homes (up to 6 residents)(z) 5,000 50 Detached Dwellings 5,000 50 Min. Setbacks (ft.) I Max. Height (ft.) Min. Off - Front( Side I Rear Street (1) Parking 10 2.5 Z5 5 5 I n/a n/a 5 10 30 2/unit 5 10 30 f 2/unit (1) Waterfront detached dwellings in LMDR District should be 25 feet except as provided in Article 3 Division 8, Section 3-805 and Division 9, Section 3-904 and except where adjacent structures on either side of the parcel proposed for development are setback 20 feet and then the rear setback shall be 20 feet. The Building Code may require the rear setback to be at least 18 feet from a seawall. (2) Community residential homes shall not be located within 1,000 feet of one another. about:blank 6/17/2015 i Clearwater, FL Community De—lopment Code LOW MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT ("LMDR') MINIMUM STANDARD DEVELOPMENT SF(d) ... _...'.0...... SETBACK: REAR FEET [EXCEPT WATERFRONT] i ............._.._... CRH 10 SETBACK: REAR FEET ACCESSORY 10 STRUCTURES SETBACK: REAR ACCESSORY STRUCTURES € 5 SETBACK: SIDE FEET SF(d) ; SETBACK: SIDE 5 FEET ..................... GRH , ..... ...... _._ SETBACK; SIDE ( 5 FEET LOT AREA SF(d) 5,000 S.F. CRH 5,000 S.F. _ ACC.FSSORYSIRU LURES NIA LOT WIDTH i SF(d) 50 FEET 1111 ..............._..__. CRH 50 FEET ACCESSORYSIRUCil RFS N/A MAX. HEIGHT _..................... __................. 1111. ............ SF(d) 30 FEET SF(d) ry 25 SETBACK: FRONT FEET CRH �25� SETBACK: FRONT j FEET CRH 30 FEET Page 2 of 5 LMDR Minimum Standard Development Diagram (Ord. No. 6417-99, § 2, 8-19-99; Ord. No. 6526-00, § 1, 6-15-00; Ord. No. 6928-02, §§ 4, 5, 5-2-02; Ord. No. 7449-05, §§ 4, 5,12-15-05; Ord. No. 7631-06, § 20, 11-2-06; Ord. No. 8540-14, § 3,4-3-14; Ord. No. 8654-15, § 4,2-5-15) Section 2-203. - Flexible standard development. The following Level One uses are permitted in the LMDR District subject to the standards and criteria set out in this Section and other applicable regulations in Article 3. Table 2-203. "LMDR" District Flexible Standard Development Use Min. Min. Lot Width Min. Setbacks (ft.) Max. Height (ft.) Min. Lot(ftJ............. ..............1 ........... .--- _ 1 .11...1...1-_1 Off - Size >Front Side Rear Street (sq. (1) Parking ... ft) ......... _ ............... . .......__. j .......... Attached Dwellings 10,000 100 25 10 15 1 30 2/unit about:blank 6/17/2015 k Clearwater, FL Community De—lopment Code .... ......... _I ._._... Detached Dwellings 5,000 50 ........ Residential Infill Projects(3) n/a n/a Utility/Infrastructure Facilities(2) n/a n/a Page 3 of 5 15-25 5 5-15 ! 30 2/unit .......... 10-25 0-5 0-15 30 2/unit 2�...........- 10 .........15 .�....._.. n/a... n/a.... (1) Waterfront detached dwellings in LMDR District should be 25 feet except as provided in Article Division 8, section 3-805 and Division 9, section 3-904 and except where adjacent structures on either side of the parcel proposed for development are setback 20 feet and then the rear setback shall be 20 feet. The Building Code may require the rear setback to be at least 18 feet from any seawall. (2) Utility/infrastructure uses shall not exceed three acres. Any such use, alone or when added to contiguous like uses which exceed three acres shall require a land use plan map amendment to Transportation which shall include such uses and all contiguous like uses. (3) The development standards for residential infill projects are guidelines and may be varied based on the criteria set forth in Section 2-203(C). Flexibility Criteria: W — A. Attached dwellings. 1. The parcel proposed for development is a corner lot and is vacant on the date of adoption of this Development Code; 2. The buildings are designed with front setbacks on both streets; 3. Off-street parking is screened from adjacent parcels of land by a landscaped wall or fence of at least four feet in height; 4. No more than two of the front doors of the dwelling units front on a single street; 5. The development of the attached dwellings does not require the removal of a protected tree; 6. The dwelling units are contained in no more than two buildings; 7. The buildings are consistent with the architectural style of existing dwellings in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; 8. The parcel proposed for development is not located in a designated Neighborhood Conservation District, or if the parcel is within the boundaries of a designated Neighborhood Conservation District, the lot area, lot width and setbacks are not less than 90 percent of the average lot area, lot width and setbacks of all improved parcels of land which are located within the Neighborhood Conservation Immediate Vicinity Area and the height does not exceed 120 percent of the average height of buildings and structures located within the Neighborhood Conservation Immediate Vicinity Area. B. Detached dwellings. 1. Frontsetback: a. A determination of the front setback shall consider the extent to which existing structures in the neighborhood have been constructed to a regular or uniform set back from the right-of-way; b. The reduction in front setback will not adversely affect adjacent property values. c. The reduction in front setback is consistent with neighborhood character; and d. The reduction in front setback results in an efficient house layout. 2. Rear setback: a. The reduction in rear setback will allow for the preservation of existing vegetation which could not otherwise be preserved; or b. The reduction in rear setback will allow the development or redevelopment of a substandard lot which would otherwise not be feasible; or c. The reduction results in an efficient house layout; and d. The structures located within the rear setback otherwise required in the LMDR District are buffered with landscape material or fences to protect the privacy and value of adjacent properties. 0 3. Side setback: The reduction inside setback will allow for the preservation of existing vegetation which could not otherwise be preserved. Residential infill projects: 1. Single-family detached dwellings are the only permitted use eligible for residential infill project application; 2. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from one or more of the following: intensity; other development standards; 3. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties; 4. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the district; 5. The uses within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses; 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; 7. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole; 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height, off-street parking access or other development standards are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. D. Utility/infrastructure facilities. 1. No above ground structures are located adjacent to a street right-of-way; 2. Any above ground structure other than permitted telecommunication towers and utility distribution lines located on or along a rear lot line shall be screened from view by a landscaped opaque wall or fence which is at least two-thirds the height of the above ground structure and shall be landscaped with trees and hedges which five years after installation will substantially obscure the fence or wall and the above ground structure. (Ord. No. 6526-00, § 1, 6-15-00; Ord. No. 6680-01, § 2, 4-5-01; Ord. No. 7413-05, § 3, 5-5-05; Ord. No. 7449-05, § 38,12-15-05; Ord. No. 7605-06, § 21, 4-20-06) Section 2-204. - Flexible development. The following Level Two uses are permitted in the LMDR District subject to the standards and criteria set out in this section and other applicable regulations in Article 3. about:blank 6/17/2015 0 Clearwater, FL Community De— lopment Code Use Table\2-204. "LMDR" District Flexible Development Min.\Lot Min. Lot Width Min. Setbacks (ft.) Size (ft.) (sq. ft.) Front Side . ........... ............ Attached Dwellings ............................................ __............. .............. _............ Detached Dwellings _. _.... ......... Non -Residential Off -Street Parking ........ Parks and Recreation Facilities Rear (1) Page 4 of 5 Max. Height Min. Off - (ft.) Street Parking 10,000 I 100 2L 5 15 30 3,000— 25-50 15-25 2-5 5-15 30 5,000 n/a n/a 25 10 10 n/a n/a n/a 35 f 20 25 30 .............. .............. ...... .... ..... .. . ......... 11 11 i .. . .. ...... ... Residential Infill Projects(2) n/a n/a 10-25 0-5 0-15 30 ...... Schools ....... _ 40,000 200 35 �... 15.... _......._30 2/unit 2/unit n/a 1 per 20,000 SF land area or as determined by the community development director based on ITE Manual standards ..................I 2/unit 1/3 students (1) Waterfront detached dwellings in LMDR District should be 25 feet except as provided in Article 3 Division 8, Section 3-805 and Division 9, Section 3-904 and except where adjacent structures on either side of the parcel proposed for development are setback 20 feet and then the rear setback shall be 20 feet. The Building Code may require the rear setback to be at least 18 feet from a seawall. (2) The development6eJ standards for residential infill projects are guidelines and maybe varied based on the criteria specified in Section 2-204(E). Flexibility Criteria: Iv V vA. Attached dwellings. 1. The parcel proposed for development is a corner lot and is vacant on the date of adoption of this Development Code; 2. The buildings are designed with front setbacks on both streets; 3. Off-street parking is screened from adjacent parcels of land by a landscaped wall or fence of at least four feet in height; 4. No more than two dwelling units front on a single street; S. The development of attached dwellings does not require the removal of a protected tree; 6. The dwelling units are contained in no more than two buildings; 7. The buildings are consistent with the architectural style of existing dwellings in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; 8. The parcel proposed for development is not located in a designated Neighborhood Conservation District; or if the parcel is within the boundaries of a designated Neighborhood Conservation District, the lot area, lot width and setbacks are not less than 90 percent of the average lot area, lot width and setbacks of all improved parcels of land which are located within the Neighborhood Conservation Immediate Vicinity Area and the height does not exceed 120 percent of the average height of buildings and structures located within the Neighborhood Conservation Immediate Vicinity Area. B. Detached dwellings. 1. Minimum lot size per dwelling of less than 5,000 square feet is an existing lot or a lot size of less than 5,000 square feet is necessary to the development or redevelopment of a vacant lot which would otherwise not be economically feasible; 2. Access is provided to each lot by frontage on a public street or by an easement of access at least 15 feet in width; 3. The volume to lot size ratio of the structures to be developed on the lot is no more than ten percent greater than the average volume to lot size ratio of all existing structures within 500 feet of the lot; 4. Front setback: a. The existing structures along the same side of the road have been constructed with irregular setbacks and the proposed reduction in front setback will not be out of character with the neighborhood; b. The extent to which existing structures in the neighborhood have been constructed to a regular or uniform set back from the right-of-way; c. The reduction in front setback will not adversely affect adjacent property values; 5. Rear setback: a. The reduction in rear setback will allow for the preservation of existing vegetation which could not otherwise be preserved; or b. The reduction in rear setback will allow the development or redevelopment of a substandard structure which would otherwise not be feasible; or about:blank 6/17/2015 Clearwater, FL Community De—lopment Code Page 5 of 5 TWO c. The reduction results in an efficient house layout. 6. Side setback: The reduction in side setback will allow for the preservation of existing vegetation which could not otherwise be preserved. C. Non-residential off-street parking. 1. The parcel proposed for development is contiguous to the parcel on which the non-residential use which will be served by the off-street parking spaces, is located and has a common boundary of at least 25 feet, or the parcel proposed for development is located immediately across a public road from the non- residential use which will be served by the off-street parking spaces, provided that access to the off-street parking does not involve the use of local streets which have residential units on both sides of the street. 2. No off-street parking spaces are located in the required front setback for detached dwellings in the LMDR District or within ten feet, whichever is greater, or within ten feet of a side or rear lot line, except along the common boundary of the parcel proposed for development and the parcel on which the non- residential use which will be served by the off-street parking spaces. 3. Off-street parking spaces are screened by a wall or fence of at least three feet in height which is landscaped on the external side with a continuous hedge or non -deciduous vine. 4. All outdoor lighting is automatically switched to turn off at 9:00 p.m. 5. All parking spaces shall be surface parking. D. Parks and recreation facilities. 1. The proposed use is compatible with the surrounding properties. 2. Off-street parking is screened from adjacent parcels of land and any street by a landscaped wall or fence of at least four feet in height. 3. All outdoor lighting is designed so that no light fixtures cast light directly on adjacent land used for residential purposes. 4. The characteristics of the parcel proposed for development are such that the uses of the property will require fewer parking spaces than otherwise required or that the use of significant portions of the property will be use for passive recreational purposes. E. Residential infill projects. 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from one or more of the following: intensity; other development standards; 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties; 3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the district; 4. The uses within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses: 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; 6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole; 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height, off-street parking, access or other development standards are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. F. Schools. 1. The parcel proposed for development fronts on a major arterial street; 2. All off-street parking is located at least 200 feet from any property used for residential purposes or is designated as residential in the Zoning Atlas; 3. All outdoor lighting is designed and located so that no light fixture is within 200 feet from the nearest existing building used for residential purposes and so that no light falls on residential property. (Ord. No. 6526-00, § 1, 6-15-00; Ord. No. 6S95-00,5 2, 9-7-00; Ord. No. 7413-05, § 4, 5-5-05; Ord. No. 7449-05, § 38,12-15-05; Ord. No. 7605-06, § 22, 4-20-06) about:blank 6/17/2015 1�i2 QroQer�h� t,Mn(z 1-7�/� /2 v5 5- 00 00 fl - C14 E z z O 269B i C2q OSI ..4� t ♦ T__77 W I so i _ E a 2878 - i ._..._ ............. ...._.. . --- --- PALMETTO ST CR-SaE C ETV R S IEW t J- ti.w- __.... "..._.. DREW &maa L-3 : /4j I' i \�� JHJI:ArtHi'd'JH LIf< N V✓ 3 �, -- JAul CARANDA CR S S j L � I a a I 1 z TV e ST 9011110 E. Legend ___ -° -"" it ii w� � nj� OR I rtt r' a F -_<s] SUB NUMBER (' - Refer to Plat) 30 w 7 BLOCK NUMBER w_ - O SUB PARCEL NUMBER P L=' y svoz PARCEL NUMBER (M&B) ------ '- LAND HOOK (Common Ownership) PLATTED SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY MAPLE Si _ W 771 `l T-' 3 LMDR - Low Medium Density Residential ---- Trails Property with Agreement to Annex: it 1 MHDR Medium High Density Residential C ETV R S IEW t J- ti.w- __.... "..._.. DREW &maa L-3 : /4j I' i \�� JHJI:ArtHi'd'JH LIf< N V✓ 3 �, -- JAul CARANDA CR S S j L � I a a I 1 z TV e ST 9011110 E. Legend ___ -° -"" it ii w� � nj� OR I R—OSEM�ERE RD WALNUT nwc!'= ST fan ST L/VU i -T' - learwater U Prepared by: - Engineering Department F Geographic Technolo Division t7. r t9Y 100 S. Myrtle Ave, Clearwater, FL 33756 Al Ph: (727)562-4750, Fax: (727)526-4755 ' j' .. /�4-' - i- -` www.MyClearwateccom - - Disclaimer: - :vALNyT ST Public information data is fumished by the City of Clearwater Engineering Department, and must be accepted and used by the recipient with the understanding that the data received was collected for the purpose of developing a graphic infrastructure imentory. As such, the City of Clearwater makes no warranties, expressed or implied, concerning the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of this data for any other particular use. Furthermore, the City of Cleanwater assumes no liability whatsoever associated with the use or misuse of such data. Notice: STELM'.MDOD ST This map may not incorporate the latest field information. For the most up4o-0ste depletion of this infrastructure, consult the City of Clea tees GIs Mapli J _-,7- , t-�- _ Applications at http:fclearwatedGiShndea.asp s-�-s } ia, •-3 N W E 200 100 0 200 Feet -- -- E. Legend ___ -° -"" it ii ♦ City Owned Property OR I rtt r' a F -_<s] SUB NUMBER (' - Refer to Plat) 30 WALNUT nwc!'= ST fan ST L/VU i -T' - learwater U Prepared by: - Engineering Department F Geographic Technolo Division t7. r t9Y 100 S. Myrtle Ave, Clearwater, FL 33756 Al Ph: (727)562-4750, Fax: (727)526-4755 ' j' .. /�4-' - i- -` www.MyClearwateccom - - Disclaimer: - :vALNyT ST Public information data is fumished by the City of Clearwater Engineering Department, and must be accepted and used by the recipient with the understanding that the data received was collected for the purpose of developing a graphic infrastructure imentory. As such, the City of Clearwater makes no warranties, expressed or implied, concerning the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of this data for any other particular use. Furthermore, the City of Cleanwater assumes no liability whatsoever associated with the use or misuse of such data. Notice: STELM'.MDOD ST This map may not incorporate the latest field information. For the most up4o-0ste depletion of this infrastructure, consult the City of Clea tees GIs Mapli J _-,7- , t-�- _ Applications at http:fclearwatedGiShndea.asp s-�-s } ia, •-3 N W E 200 100 0 200 Feet -- -- E. Legend ___ -° -"" ♦ City Owned Property OR I zD� Transfer of Development Rights r' a F -_<s] SUB NUMBER (' - Refer to Plat) 30 w 7 BLOCK NUMBER w_ - O SUB PARCEL NUMBER P L=' y svoz PARCEL NUMBER (M&B) ------ '- LAND HOOK (Common Ownership) PLATTED SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY MAPLE Si MAPLE ST W COUNTY HIGHWAY STATE HIGHWAY s U.S. HIGHWAY `l T-' 3 LMDR - Low Medium Density Residential ---- Trails Property with Agreement to Annex: it 1 MHDR Medium High Density Residential \ Other ATA 0 Records i ; I _ 1 ! - Sanitary Only ATA - 0 Records RICvEVti00Da=:Sanitary _ & Water ATA- 0 Records a 0 O J ``IIII Water Only ATA - 0 Records (""''� Y Solid Waste Only ATA - 0 Records I ® ATA Outside Chain of Title - 0 Records E a Unincorporated Enclave Type "A" - 7 , Unincorporated Enclave Type "B" FA's Outside Clearwater Service w_ - of Area - Zoning Legend RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS LDR - Low Density Residential `l LMDR - Low Medium Density Residential MDR Medium Density Residential MHDR Medium High Density Residential - HDR - High Density Residential 0 MHP - Mobile Home Park _ CRNCOD - Coachman Ridge Neighborhood Conservation - 0 Overlay District IENCOD - Island Estates Neighborhood Conservation y' E - p_i- Overlay District _ . ` _ s. COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS SPECIAL USE DISTRICTS 1 O - Office IRT - Industnai, Research and Technology T -Tourism I-Institutuional - s7 C - Commercial OS/R - Open Space/Recreational D - Downtown P Preservation Area 1 Zoning Atlas 13' k _ Updated: 6/29/2095 SW 1/4 of 11-29-15 nIN 279A I#: 2012007567 BK: 17456 r-- 1745, _f$18560 D DOC STAMP COLLEC' S $1050 COUNTY, FL BY DEPUTY CLERK: CLKDMC5 Prepared by: Leah Negri Star Title Partners of Palm Harbor, LLC 35095 US Highway 19 North, Suite 102 Palm Harbor, Florida 34684 File Number. PHSS11772 01/10/2012 at 10:58 AM 'RECORDING 2 PAGES .00 KEN BURKE, CLERK COURT PINELLAS General Warranty Deed - Made this January 6, 2012 A.D. By Eileen F. Pearson f/k/a Eileen F. Meyers -Pearson, a\dingle rvbtnan, whose address is: 2025 Arbor Lane, Clearwater, Florida 33763, hereinafter called the gra4tor, to G�oYge R: Alexander, whose post office address is: 203 N. Glenwood Ave, Clearwater, Florida 33755, Thereinafter walled the grantee: (Whenever used herein the term "grantor" and "grantee" include all the parties ta-thts instrument and the heirs, legal representatives and assigns of individuals, and the successors and assigns of corporations) ' > Witnesseth, that the grantor, for and in consideration of the suniDfTgn Dollars, ($10.00) and other valuable considerations, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, hV'r:eby grants, bargains, sells, aliens, remises, releases, conveys and confirms unto the grantee, all that-certaiir 6d'si�uate in Pinellas County, Florida, viz: > Lot 64, Glenwood Subdivision, agcording to;the plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 8, Page 14, of the Public Records of,Pii�)e .County, Florida. Parcel ID Number: 1129153119�DOU0640' ' ;> Together with all the tenetxents, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. To Have and.to I 61d, the same in fee simple forever. And the-grantoriereby covenants with said grantee that the grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that, the gt'atitor has -good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land; that the grantor hereby fully warranfs,' titlb.to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever; and that\gaid land is 6 6 of all encumbrances except taxes accruing subsequent to December 31, 2011. Page 1 of 2 DEED Individual War anty Deed - Legal on Face Closers Choice (PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF. REr BK 17456 PG 1746 .l Prepared by: Leah Negri Star Title Partners of Palm Harbor, LLC 35095 US Highway 19 North, Suite 102 Palm Harbor, Florida 34684 File Number. PHSS11772 In Witness Whereof, written. the said grantor has signed and sealed these presents the day and j�Oitst above Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence: - - - (Seal) Eileen F. Pearson f/k/a Eileen t -..Meyers -Pearson Address: 2025 Arbor Lane, Clearwater, Florida 33763 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before this January 6, 2012, by Eileen F. Pearson f/k/a Eileen F. Meyers -Pearson, a single woman, 'y 119" A/are '_personally known to me or who has produced a6.identiidation. �.r Pu4Notary Public State.of Florid. i Negri o e Leh pm j*ston l. E,029600my C , 0 . (Seal �i'o' � E,Pires O 10119(2 if 1 � �1 lA Cit' G O)'e, DEED Individual Warranty Deed - Legal on Face Closers' Choice Page 2 of 2 1, COMPLAINT NOTIFICATION ADDRESS: DATE RECEIVED: ,',.'ATURE OF COMP' JAINT.: ,;--I T- is F. COMPLAINT NOTIFICATION ADDRESS: DATE RECEIVED: ,',.'ATURE OF COMP' JAINT.: ,;--I T- f r, 2. •,�} .. ` I � � - mak' _'' .1. tt `�� Bis lriic, S�ie of �lOni bon got. a a" August 29, 1986 Ms . Sally H. Foote 312 North Glenw-od Avenue Clearwater, FL -33515 T I 1Yww1�a arvoF I. a-vvw. I directed my staff to review the matters you BroughDat our attention regarding the use of residences loc e'317 N. Highland.Avenue, 403 N. Highland Avenue a d 2Glenwood Avenue. We are aware that these reside es other similar residences in our older Clearwater neighbor- hoods have garage apartments that were initially permitted as additions for the purpose of housing family members, such as an older pa-ent or other relative. over the years, as the original nee,l for the additional structure no longer existed, the ext. living space has been used as an inde- pendent apartment separate from the main residence. The City does not endorse the establishment of apartments or extra residential units in neighborhoods which are zoned for single family use only. I do not propose however to "go back" and require those properties which established.:. Separate living units in years past to eliminate the extra . unit. Instructions are being forwarded to our Building Department;; to be watchful of those permits being requested in single family zoning districts which might result in two or more independent living units being constructed on one lot. If they find such a situation being created upon inspection of the property, a "stop work" order and/or a citation will..• be issued. In addition, I asa requesting our Code Administrator to draft an amendment to the Code which would recognize and allow legitimate extra living space additions to single family homes to accommodate additional family members but would prohibit the conversion of the extra living area to an independent living unit. J I Page Two. August 29, 1986 Ms. Sally H. Foote We Rnpreciat" you . notifying the CitY--'Of the conditions in your neighborhood. Hopefully, the plans I have out- lined to you will help to insure homogenous single family neighborhoods throughout Clearwater.•• Sincerely, Anthony L. Shoemaker City Manager CC: John Richter Code Adminiitratot V / J y CITY OF CLEARWATER John Richter, Code Administrator thru Intordaoort .ant Cernspondenta 5h..t TO: Joe McFate, Director of Planning Urb�n Deve �ment.i FROM Anthony L. Shoemaker, City Manager/Jt COPIES: SUBJECT: Living Area Additions to Houses in Single Family Zoning Districts DATE: August 29, 1986 In light of correspondence we received recently regarding the conversion of additional structures on single family lots into separate, independent dwelling units, I am requesting you and your staff to research and draft a proposal for amendment to the Land Development Code addressing this situation. My purpose in requesting such an amendment would be to allow the addition or construction of additional living area to a single family home in a single family toning district to provide space for additional persons residing with the household. Such an amendment must preclude the conversion of the additional area into another dwelling unit by clearly defining what type facilities may or may not be allowed to be provided in the additional living area. I am aware that other communities provide for "mother-in-law" type additions to single family homes. I would like to bring this issue before the Commission in the Format of a proposed Code amendment. �C CNj LA X,9___ • s: �. ...QFFARTK:a ' i fed A100J) qa, TO: City Manager Anthony L. Shoemaker FROM: John D. Richter, De-i%c?opment Code Administror COPIES: Joseph R, McFate, 11, Director of Planning & Urban Development SUBJECT: Living Area Additions to Houses in Single Family Zoning Districts DATE: September 22, 1986 This is to respond to your memorandum to me dated August 29, 1986. Single family zoning districts are reserved for single family residential development and, accordingly, the permitted uses include detached single family dwellings. A single family dwelling is "[a) detached building designed for or occupied exclusively by one family; no portion of which building interior, including any complete kitchen shall be so designed, arranged or closed off in a manner that eliminates access thereto or exit therefrom." Responding to my request for interpretation, Al Galbraith informs me that multiple detached buildings may be built for dwelling purposes on a single property and still qualify as one single family dwelling providing there is only one complete—Tcitchen per property. Please give me further direction if you still wish for me to process an amendment to the code. JDR/cc E108 NUMBER. 2015069 SEC77ON 11, TOWSh.. 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST FOR THE BENEFIT OF. RINEU AS COUNTY FLORIDA GEORGE ALEXANDER ��, ; �52f3 •�o sy �- �� Radius = 331.54(S) Arc = 124.J6(C) Chord Bearing = N 69'72'50-E (M) ®� CJ r /�GQ A p. 6 A s Chord= 123.63(M) ® R 5�fv%®/(P) PNET. 26ASPN. F.C.M. 3 x 3" CONC i w WALL 44- Q CON,b N_ C DRIVE F.I.R. 112" OAK 4 r [ 1 i 51.0' t� ON op 2 STORY ci BRICK 21.0' 17.6 LOT 65 CONC. RESIDENCE o WOOD cc N DECK WALK OAK 33' #203 10.7' t� wv ¢ v'n: TAIRS I O 2.0' << \ 38.3' l� 12.7" o N LOT 64 z 38.4' 28.8' OAK 47' � S CONC. 'DECK. 9.5x 75' 4 a OAK 37" 8" VINYL SHED r ^ 2 CONC WTH COVERED N v 0 WALL II� A4A GO AREA .D. '), 0.6FN 24 0 oHW S. I. R CONC. WALK 2' CONC. CURB S-90-00-00-W(M) 116'(8) 116.25(M) DREW STREET 50' ASPH. PVMT. 30 0 15 30 SCALE.1 3 ' .EMME,L""a S".�vt--y Page 2 of 2 17-7 �a 1054 KAPP DRIVE, CLEARWAWF FLORIDA 33755 OFRCECER7I CA7F 474-3751, AU7HORIZAX77ON2LB NO 789 LiA „ , �" •�®' Ta �VEY 'Q Z: ELZa emak emmelandsurmyOgmaiLcom wabs/t& ww .emmelandsur,,eying corn SEE PAGE 1 FOR LEOPAL t DESCRIP7ICN, tZGEND & ,NO"M d08' I IMBER: 2015069 FOR THE BENEFI T OF: GEORGE ALEXANDER SEC77ON 11, TOMSt,._ 29 SOUK, RANGE 15 EAST PINELLAS COUNTn FLORIDA STREET ADDRES'�: 20,E N. GLENWOOD ,A VENUE CLEARWA TER, FL 3°3755 LEGAL DESCRIP770N. I ABBRE✓7A77ON LEGEND. LOT 64, BLOCK GLENWOOD SUBDIWSION, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 8, PAGE 14, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. I SURVEYORS NOTES: I 1. ALL CORNERS FOUND HAVE NO NUMBER DESIGNATING THE PREVIOUS SURVEYOR OR COMPANY EXCEPT AS SHOWN. 2 ALL BEARINGS AND DISTANCES ARE MEASURED PER PLAT AND/OR DEED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. J. NO UNDERGROUND ENCROACHMENTS, FOUNDA77ONS OR UTILITIES HAVE BEEN LOCATED OR SHOWN UNLESS OTHERMSE NOTED. 4. NO INSTRUMENTS OF RECORD REFLECTING EASEMENTS, RIGHTS—OF—WAY AND/OR OWNERSHIP HAVE BEEN FURNISHED EXCEPT AS SHOWN HEREON. 5. BAS/S OF BEARINGS. SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF ROSEWOOD STREET, BEING N. 6922'50- E. PER PRIOR SURVEY (NO BEARINGS ON PLAT 6 ACCORDING To THE MANAGEMENT AGENCY NA77ONALLFLOODGENCY INSURANCE RATE MAP NUMBER 12103C0109H, (COMMUNITY NUMBER 125096, PANEL 0109, SUFFIX H) MAP REVISED DATE 9/3/2003, AND THE BUILDING SHOWN HEREON lS IN FLOOD ZONE X. 7. THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF PERVIOUS SURVEY PERFORMED BY AMERICAN SURVEYING AND MAPPING DATED 3/4/02 (S) REFLECTS THIS DATA F.I.R. = FOUND IRON ROD (SIZE INDICATED) SEC. = SEC77ON .SI.R. = SET IRON ROD 1/2' LB7895 £MME' ThP. = TOWNSHIP ):!I.P. = FOUND IRON PIPE (SIZE INDICATED) RGE. = RANGE F.P.P. = FOUND IRON PIPE PINCHED (SIZE INDICATED) (D) = DEED F.N.D. = FOUND NAIL 3 DISK (P) = PLAT aN.D. = SET NAIL do DISK LB7895 cMME (M) = MEASURED F.C.M. = FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT (C) = CAL CULA7ED P.R.M. = PERMANENT REFERENCE MONUMENT (F) = FIELD P.C.P. = PERMANET.IT CONTROL POINT (R) = RADIAL Pd. —POINT OF INTERSEC77ON P.B. = PLAT BOOK P. C. = POINT OF CURVE PG. = PAGE P.V.B. = POINT GF OGWIY%V%IYG (.DTVI.. _ (.VNCRC IG R/W = RIGHT—OF-WAY CIC = COVERED CONC. TYR = TYPICAL ASPH. = ASPHALT S/W = SIDEWALK PV1i lT. = PAVEMENT O.R. = OFFICIAL RECORDS ESMT. = EASEMENT P.S.M. = PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR do MAPPER ELEV. = ELEVA77ON `D, DEN07ES UTILITY POLE A/C = AIR COND177ONER FW—Ml DENOTES WATER METER E/P = EDGE OF PAVEMENT 8 DEN07ES POOL HEATER COR. = CORNER (j, = CENTERLINE P DEN07ES POOL PUMP DENOTES DRAINAGE MANHOLE 0Hw DENOTES OVERHEAD WRE(S) DENOTES LIGHT POLE ° DEN07ES 6' KVOD FENCE CB DENOTES IRRIGA770N CONTROL BOX DENOTES 6' V1NLY FENCE DENOTES VERIZON U77LITY VAULT (UNLESS 07HERMSE NOTED) �^ DEN07ES CABLE BOX(S) SURVEYORS CER77FICA77ON: CER77FIED AS A BOUNDARY SURVEY UNLESS lT BEARS THE SIGNATURE AND THE ELECTRONIC OR ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA IICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER, THIS DRAWN6, SKETCH, PLAT OR ;194P ;S Fl7R INFORMA TIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND IS .NOT VALID. 7HE SEAL APPEARING ON 7H/S DOCUMENT WAS AUTHORIZED BY ELIZABETH KATHLEEN MERTA ON MARCH 24, 2075. ELIZABETH KATHLEEN MERTA, P.SM. /y6713 LAST DA 7E OF FIELD WORK: 03/24/2015 FIELD BOOK 1501, PG. 63 1054 KAPP DRIVE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33765 OMC£ (727) 474-3751, FAX (727) 474-3753 ' CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION LB ND. 7895 emoll.' emmelandsurveyoymoll.com webslte: ;emmelandsurvez ng.com Page 1 of 2 FLAT 4)F SURVEY )(tiCR!+' IiC'N (A5 !1!5) x) ! OT 64, F' t NWOC,0. At C^tP;Y'I!; 10 THE +)l Ai 1H( !il (1f `+':I It. Of ilii P1001.1c FiJ.r:Oiii; ; (1i fF•NFL(A5 f:T11.1N!v FLOWNk !7C?SF WOOD STRE-r_ s,) vi..AiIFD solul! Of INA', A',r>HALT ROADWAY .- '411.54'(1) -- — L "2955" . B = S69*22150"'w j. ;i oAl. •5 1rI vF f otmo 1/7' .HON R(Io NO wuFM9 (OuND NAH • oisN (1FVt SE CORNIR lot 26 DCM 1 COMM rt DP1rf • " . � r I o eto I, .� • e, Ea . 3MAW(C) A• "W44, Ib00'(p) L . 11 ce - tM Iw- m — ---._...( — RC1) ND Nuwm:R Nt rnkmfR LOI tib t1ti.V+0 3'xl• CONCRETE 41 ND MUwK.R LOT 64 28.S —._— I.0 i (,.17 II P TAI r•i'� i •r �.-1 !1 li f 4 ii (..' i. (... - _ r (NA C(NNtR NOT ACC1_S`:IiI F _ - FIE 6A% (1000 E11YAn13H K.c •4 ,r CTf-Nf3: tl':A. OKN/H%,D UIN)T7 li 0,q�001Nc A i• f._ .c _.].. ._. ... 11 vNY in (''�,lwi li � �• (''-, .. Cr•:)'i5 NAC'u': IFS M l!A 1:+UL ^(l' of KRYAMCNt CONTROL P01N1 y(ptT (Y INTERSECTION `�.<.' ; DI MU Its ANC Cf NGiN t POINT Cl IANUNCY . - - /-•, (.`t..'.1 .' ' , 1 1 ,.;1 ( J_:l, ) t l.il I.1,ow) R(At.*G PC PONE M Cl—AftM CERTIFIED f0: • i `1'�' Hrulr a UAY IINf X11 r 01HN tiw EENCIE low iEM(f EIIFEN f. Pf.ARSON }'') ^ ) �•.-:.'�-�.. v .. : i.,., it I'tR r1 Ar fu� v.A,uREu AIR CAt_ /. ,, / , -, "�.. '...f. 't •- /, •.�, WASHNGION ►1U MAL HANK f A ti .J 1` Nir: Ni C.D'+F NV II A f. A/ I U1 • -. ,... r -• '. r.l)w • . RA(, S'011r RA(, 1 .:. 90.00'00" r 115.32 Fot1NO NAM As fu!x 18#24 l iwvl w,tx IS n.2' (IO F At NN K IS DREW STIRLF -1 Ill AfIED Wl;lii C! WAY I H0At11YAY 1e m? ) v f r „ , : 31'r'2` AS 1 r•i'� Pt)NT d RfKNSf C:.AtYAlll1+( f 4 ii (..' i. (... - _ (NA C(NNtR NOT ACC1_S`:IiI F _ - FIE 6A% (1000 E11YAn13H K.c •4 ,r CTf-Nf3: tl':A. OKN/H%,D UIN)T7 li 0,q�001Nc A 6UWSS Al :MD SUNK NC SMS'; f._ .c _.].. ._. ... vNY LAND gfNKYd1 PtRYANfNi RULRfNCF YONV12[NT (''�,lwi li � �• (''-, .. Cr•:)'i5 NAC'u': IFS M l!A 1:+UL ^(l' of KRYAMCNt CONTROL P01N1 y(ptT (Y INTERSECTION `�.<.' ; DI MU Its ANC Cf NGiN t POINT Cl IANUNCY . - - /-•, (.`t..'.1 .' ' , 1 1 ,.;1 ( J_:l, ) t l.il I.1,ow) R(At.*G PC PONE M Cl—AftM CERTIFIED f0: • i `1'�' Hrulr a UAY IINf X11 r 01HN tiw EENCIE low iEM(f EIIFEN f. Pf.ARSON }'') ^ ) �•.-:.'�-�.. v .. : i.,., it I'tR r1 Ar fu� v.A,uREu AIR CAt_ /. ,, / , -, "�.. '...f. 't •- /, •.�, WASHNGION ►1U MAL HANK f A ti .J 1` Nir: Ni C.D'+F NV II A f. A/ I AIR C,pNI)(Sl(NIR if Rl.ttx wA1.I 1RANSCONIINENIAL Illil. ColAPANr I. [fWfNl")t Rpm . RA(, S'011r RA(, O(.D Rf PURI IC N A TION AI 1111f i : L`. ,, '•� •— w•.... ._ _. 1 HAVE EXANINI-D 1111; F.1 R M. (:OMMUt,i I PANI I. NO 12x096 0016 D DATED E/19/91 ANO t(M)ND THE SUBJLCT PROVE RIY API IARS If) lJE IN 7(:N( Y. AREA DUIS10f IDO YEAR IIOI() KARINGS jjJREDN rlA%'Il) (01 TmE NIEI RINEEIF ll BEING N S10OD'DO• C AN ASSIJ4F.0 DAIUu (fEEI1) I)AIE_) 2155 .._ Rf_VI:JR tC• A! E 1� �� .lA If E. _. ... WOOD FENC!_ - BCP2002.043 203 N GL, EMVODU AVE ATlac W)T MUMUM.4Wri.ri 5 243 % Gtfluwaac AVE BCP2002-04388 1. m. S(fR%4_Y0N HAS t1U1 AOSIRACTIA) DE: LAND fil0*N IIfRCON 1012 I.ASFUE:NES. RICA p' WAY, RES(RICIIC.NS Gf f2E(,ORr) YAUCH MAY Af rECT T►if IITI f. (i!2 119 OF I1K LAND 2. NO UNDERGROUND IME'R0'A:4FN T5 NAVE HUN LOCATED CXC(:Pf AS ti(OWN. 1 NOT YAIIO 1111111(011 T1! !:LNAIVNE AND Rif. (filG!NA!. HAISEU SEAL OF A I I Dl(%DA IAA NSI O SIJRYI:YCIt AND NAI'E'UR. 1 I,v,hy c011[1• 11-1 .• hc.. r.rfen,,.•1 r 11.14 wrvor of 12.. Ld.�n datFlAtd pr-rcrty, let ! IM pmyc,. h.r►o0 da,uo,td, that (hl. :3'1 111��� r euro w.loNon el IhC) )uF+.y ow In$%%$ II�I�b.Y un. ec'.*! 1007 A. ,.1 fer IN M N :1UIjy�Y1NG $ j(Mi'ING� C1 'p of kC!jjyy`)5/r Im1An AAmI,'1I191!�0 V -! �I ••k/VJ,,r�(,.t/�p_1 ir.orl.^rd,+ :a1v1<. rn �.�*I " eAL'�►aD� RORUA CAf V? sC, fICLL !'SIA.: 4'" `. ll!(1L Ql Z�r' ,2rf r Surrounding Property Analysis Low Medium Density Residential District Address Homestead Status Year Constructed Number of Units 315 Orangeview Yes 1940 2 411 Orangeview Yes 1927 2 310 N Hilltop No 1926 2 319 N Hilltop No 1948 2 1444 Drew Yes 1926 2 317 N Highland No 1943 3 405 N Highland No 1953 2 415 N Highland Yes 1942 2 1525 Maple Yes 1925 2 301 Edgewood No 1950 2 312 Orangewood Yes 1926 2 315 Orangewood—F— rangewood Yes 1926 2 20 2 zK nV,4 4. "ll .,rk,IVM Addtest�-,' �,X Yea d6d-- eqc,�� ri teu , Nil U; W Of U ii 315 Orangeview Yes 1940 2 411 Orangeview Yes 1927 2 io -VO N Hilltop No 1926 2 319 N Hilltop No, 1948 2 1444 Drew Yes 1926 2 317 N Highland No 1943 3 405 N Highland No 1953 2 415 N Highland, Yes 1942 2 1525 Maple Yes 1925 2 301 Edgewood No, 1950 2 312 Orangewood Yes 1926 2 315 Orangewood Yes 1926 2 �06 (,P6� '2 .,S L\ A01 68 z.5 E; (--7 2A 00� 1'2- 612 3o SZ� -T -T (.-7 22-1 1345 Clearwater, FL Community Dt )pment Code b Page 1 of 5 DIVISION 2. - LOW MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT ("LMDR") Section 2-201. - Intent and purpose. The intent and purpose of the Low Medium Density Residential District ("LMDR") is to protect and preserve the integrity and value of existing, stable residential neighborhoods of low to medium density while at the same time, allowing a careful and deliberate redevelopment and revitalization of such neighborhoods in need of revitalization or neighborhoods with unique amenities which create unique opportunities to increase property values and the overall attractiveness of the City. Section 2-201.1. - Maximum development potential. The Low Medium Density Residential District ("LMDR") may be located in more than one land use category. It is the intent of the LMDR District that development be consistent with the Countywide Future Land Use Plan as required by State law. The uses and development potential of a parcel of land within the LMDR District shall be determined by the standards found in this Development Code as well as the Countywide Future Land Use Designation of the property, including any acreage or floor area restrictions set forth in the Rules Concerning the Administration of the Countywide Future Land Use Plan, as amended from time to time. Development potential for the Countywide Future Land Use Designations that apply to the LMDR District are as follows: Countywide Future Maximum Dwelling Units per Acre of Maximum Floor Land Use Land Area Ratio/Imper- Designation vious Surface Ratio Residential Low 5 dwelling units per acre FAR .40/ISR .65 Residential Urban 7.5 dwelling units per acre FAR .40/ISR .65 (Ord. No. 6526-00, § 1, 6-15-00; Ord. No. 7449-05, § 3,12-15-05; Ord. No. 8043-09, § 4, 9-3-09) Section 2-202. - Minimum standard development. The following uses are Level One permitted uses in the LMDR District subject to the minimum standards set out in this section and other applicable provisions of Article 3. Table 2-202. "LMDR" District Minimum Standard Development Use Min. 10 Lot Size 50 (sq. 25 ft.) Community Gardens 2/unit n/a Community Residential Homes (up to 6 residents)(z) 5,000 Detached Dwellings 2/unit 5,000 Min. Lot Width Min. Setbacks (ft.) Max. Height (ft.) (ft.) __.._... _.._._....... _. ._._. Front Side Rear (1) n/a 5 10 50 �S 50 10 25 Min. Off - Street Parking 5 5 n/a n/a 5 10 30 2/unit 5 10 30 2/unit (1) Waterfront detached dwellings in LMDR District should be 25 feet except as provided in Article 3 Division 8, Section 3-805 and Division 9, Section 3-904 and except where adjacent structures on either side of the parcel proposed for development are setback 20 feet and then the rear setback shall be 20 feet. The Building Code may require the rear setback to be at least 18 feet from a seawall. (2) Community residential homes shall not be located within 1,000 feet of one another. about:blank 9/23/2015 Clearwater, FL Community D( )pment Code Page 2 of 5 LOW MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT ("LMDR") MINIMUM STANDARD DEVELOPMENT SF(d) ;._.- ............. SETBACK: REAR i F T [EXCEPT WATERFRONT] i__.__. EET CRH 10 SETBACK: REAR ? FEET ACCESSORY -W 10 SETBACK: FEET SETBACK: REAR �---- ACCESSORY STRUCTURES 5 SETBACK: SIDE FEET SF(d) SETBACK: SIDE 5 FEET CRH SETBACK: SIDE FEET] LOT AREA SF(d) 5,000 S.F. ............................................................................... .......-.. ......................... —.............. CRH 5,000 S.F. ACCBSORY SIRUCI URES N/A SF(d) x....25 SETBACK: FRONT FEET CRH [FEET 2SETBACK: FRONT MAX, HEIGHT SF(d) 30 FEET CRH 30 FEET LMDR Minimum Standard Development Diagram (Ord. No. 6417-99, § 2, 8-19-99; Ord. No. 6526-00, § 1, 6-15-00; Ord. No. 6928-02, §§ 4, 5, 5-2-02; Ord. No. 7449-05, §§ 4, 5,12-15-05; Ord. No. 7631-06, § 20, 11-2-06; Ord. No. 8540-14, § 3, 4-3-14; Ord. No. 8654-15, § 4, 2-5-15) Section 2-203. - Flexible standard development. The following Level One uses are permitted in the LMDR District subject to the standards and criteria set out in this Section and other applicable regulations in Article 3• Table 2-203. "LMDR" District Flexible Standard Development Use Min. Min. Lot Width Lot Size (sq. .... ..... ..ft•).... .. Attached Dwellings 110,000 I 100 about:blank Min. Setbacks (ft.) Max. Height (ft.) Min. __...._ _. .. .... ...__.....__... Off - >Front Side Rear Street (�) Parking ... Z5 ..._ 10 15 L 30 2/unit 9/23/2015 Clearwater, FL Community Df )pment Code Page 3 of 5 Detached Dwellings 5,000 50 , 15-25 5 5-15 30 I 2/unit Residential Infill Projects(3) nla n/a 10-25 0-5 0-15 30 2/unit Utility/Infrastructure Facilities(2) n/a n/a 25 10 15 n/a n/a (1) Waterfront detached dwellings in LMDR District should be 25 feet except as provided in Article 3 Division 8, section 3-805 and Division 9, section 3-904 and except where adjacent structures on either side of the parcel proposed for development are setback 20 feet and then the rear setback shall be 20 feet. The Building Code may require the rear setback to be at least 18 feet from any seawall. (2) Utility/infrastructure uses shall not exceed three acres. Any such use, alone or when added to contiguous like uses which exceed three acres shall require a land use plan map amendment to Transportation which shall include such uses and all contiguous like uses. (3) The development standards for residential infill projects are guidelines and may be varied based on the criteria set forth in Section 2-203(C). Flexibility Criteria: A. Attached dwellings. 1. The parcel proposed for development is a corner lot and is vacant on the date of adoption of this Development Code; 2. The buildings are designed with front setbacks on both streets; 3. Off-street parking is screened from adjacent parcels of land by a landscaped wall or fence of at least four feet in height; 4. No more than two of the front doors of the dwelling units front on a single street; 5. The development of the attached dwellings does not require the removal of a protected tree; 6. The dwelling units are contained in no more than two buildings; 7. The buildings are consistent with the architectural style of existing dwellings in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; 8. The parcel proposed for development is not located in a designated Neighborhood Conservation District, or if the parcel is within the boundaries of a designated Neighborhood Conservation District, the lot area, lot width and setbacks are not less than 90 percent of the average lot area, lot width and setbacks of all improved parcels of land which are located within the Neighborhood Conservation Immediate Vicinity Area and the height does not exceed 120 percent of the average height of buildings and structures located within the Neighborhood Conservation Immediate Vicinity Area. B. Detached dwellings. 1. Front setback: a. A determination of the front setback shall consider the extent to which existing structures in the neighborhood have been constructed to a regular or uniform set back from the right-of-way; b. The reduction in front setback will not adversely affect adjacent property values. c. The reduction in front setback is consistent with neighborhood character, and d. The reduction in front setback results in an efficient house layout. 2. Rear setback: a. The reduction in rear setback will allow for the preservation of existing vegetation which could not otherwise be preserved; or b. The reduction in rear setback will allow the development or redevelopment of a substandard lot which would otherwise not be feasible; or c. The reduction results in an efficient house layout; and d. The structures located within the rear setback otherwise required in the LMDR District are buffered with landscape material or fences to protect the privacy and value of adjacent properties. 3. Side setback: The reduction inside setback will allow for the preservation of existing vegetation which could not otherwise be preserved. C. Residential infill projects: 1. Single-family detached dwellings are the only permitted use eligible for residential infill project application; 2. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from one or more of the following: intensity, other development standards; 3. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties; 4. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the district; 5. The uses within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses; 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; 7. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole; 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height, off-street parking access or other development standards are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. D. Utility/infrastructure facilities. 1. No above ground structures are located adjacent to a street right-of-way; 2. Any above ground structure other than permitted telecommunication towers and utility distribution lines located on or along a rear lot line shall be screened from view by a landscaped opaque wall or fence which is at least two-thirds the height of the above ground structure and shall be landscaped with trees and hedges which five years after installation will substantially obscure the fence or wall and the above ground structure. (Ord. No. 6526-00, § 1, 6-15-00; Ord. No. 6680-01, § 2, 4-5-01; Ord. No. 7413-05, § 3, 5-5-05; Ord. No. 7449-05, § 38,12-15-05; Ord. No. 7605-06, § 21,4-20-06) Section 2-204. - Flexible development. The following Level Two uses are permitted in the LMDR District subject to the standards and criteria set out in this section and other applicable regulations in Article about:blank 9/23/2015 Clearwater, FL Community Df )pment Code Page 4 of 5 Table 2-204._LMDR'_District-Flexible_Development Use Min. Min. Lot Width Min. Setbacks (ft.) Max. Height Lot (ft.) (ft.) Size (sq. ft.) Front Side Rear (1) Attached Dwellings 10'00Q__100_=. -_:15;'30--^—J Detached Dwellings 3,000— 25-50 15-25 2-5 5-15 30 5,000 Non -Residential Off -Street Parking(3) n/a n/a 25 10 10 n/a Parks and Recreation Facilities n/a n/a 35 20 25 30 Min. Off -Street Parking 2/unit n/a 1 per 20,000 SF land area or as determined by the community development director based on ITE Manual standards Schools 40,000 200 35 1 25 1 1 S 30 1/3 students (1) Waterfront detached dwellings in LMDR District should be 25 feet except as provided in Article 3 Division 8, Section 3-805 and Division 9, Section 3-904 and except where adjacent structures on either side of the parcel proposed for development are setback 20 feet and then the rear setback shall be 20 feet. The Building Code may require the rear setback to be at least 18 feet from a seawall. (2) The development standards for residential infill projects are guidelines and may be varied based on the criteria specified in Section 2-204(E). (3) Non-residential parking lots shall not exceed three acres. Any such use, alone or when added to contiguous like uses which exceed three acres sshall�re �ea land use plan map amendment to the appropriate land use category. Flexibility Criteria: A. Attached dwellings. 1. The parcel proposed for development is a corner lot and is vacant on the date of adoption of this Development Code; 2. The buildings are designed with front setbacks on both streets; C / 3. Off-street parking is screened from adjacent parcels of land by a landscaped wall or fence of at least four feet in height; 4. No more than two dwelling units front on a single street; 5. The development of attached dwellings does not require the removal of a protected tree; 6. The dwelling units are contained in no more than two buildings; 7. The buildings are consistent with the architectural style of existing dwellings in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; 8. The parcel proposed for development is not located in a designated Neighborhood Conservation District; or if the parcel is within the boundaries of a designated Neighborhood Conservation District, the lot area, lot width and setbacks are not less than 90 percent of the average lot area, lot width and setbacks of all improved parcels of land which are located within the Neighborhood Conservation Immediate Vicinity Area and the height does not exceed 120 percent of the average height of buildings and structures located within the Neighborhood Conservation Immediate Vicinity Area. B. Detached dwellings. 1. Minimum lot size per dwelling of less than 5,000 square feet is an existing lot or a lot size of less than 5,000 square feet is necessary to the development or redevelopment of a vacant lot which would otherwise not be economically feasible; 2. Access is provided to each lot by frontage on a public street or by an easement of access at least 15 feet in width; 3. The volume to lot size ratio of the structures to be developed on the lot is no more than ten percent greater than the average volume to lot size ratio of all existing structures within 500 feet of the lot; 4. Front setback: a. The existing structures along the same side of the road have been constructed with irregular setbacks and the proposed reduction in front setback will not be out of character with the neighborhood; b. The extent to which existing structures in the neighborhood have been constructed to a regular or uniform set back from the right-of-way; c. The reduction in front setback will not adversely affect adjacent property values; about:blank 9/23/2015 Clearwater, FL Community D( )pment Code Page 5 of 5 5. Rear setback: a. The reduction in rear setback will allow for the preservation of existing vegetation which could not otherwise be preserved; or b. The reduction in rear setback will allow the development or redevelopment of a substandard structure which would otherwise not be feasible; or c. The reduction results in an efficient house layout. 6. Side setback: The reduction inside setback will allow for the preservation of existing vegetation which could not otherwise be preserved. C. Non-residential off-street parking. 1. The parcel proposed for development is contiguous to the parcel on which the non-residential use which will be served by the off-street parking spaces, is located and has a common boundary of at least 25 feet, or the parcel proposed for development is located immediately across a public road from the non- residential use which will be served by the off-street parking spaces, provided that access to the off-street parking does not involve the use of local streets which have residential units on both sides of the street. 2. No off-street parking spaces are located in the required front setback for detached dwellings in the LMDR District or within ten feet, whichever is greater, or within ten feet of a side or rear lot line, except along the common boundary of the parcel proposed for development and the parcel on which the non- residential use which will be served by the off-street parking spaces. 3. Off-street parking spaces are screened by a wall or fence of at least three feet in height which is landscaped on the external side with a continuous hedge or non -deciduous vine. 4. All outdoor lighting is automatically switched to turn off at 9:00 p.m. 5. All parking spaces shall be surface parking. D. Parks and recreation facilities. 1. The proposed use is compatible with the surrounding properties. 2. Off-street parking is screened from adjacent parcels of land and any street by a landscaped wall or fence of at least four feet in height. 3. All outdoor lighting is designed so that no light fixtures cast light directly on adjacent land used for residential purposes. 4. The characteristics of the parcel proposed for development are such that the uses of the property will require fewer parking spaces than otherwise required or that the use of significant portions of the property will be use for passive recreational purposes. E. Residential infill projects. 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from one or more of the following: intensity; other development standards; 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties; 3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the district; 4. The uses within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses; 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; 6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity ofthe parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole; 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height, off-street parking, access or other development standards are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. F. Schools. 1. The parcel proposed for development fronts on a major arterial street; 2. All off-street parking is located at least 200 feet from any property used for residential purposes or is designated as residential in the Zoning Atlas; 3. All outdoor lighting is designed and located so that no light fixture is within 200 feet from the nearest existing building used for residential purposes and so that no light falls on residential property. (Ord. No. 6526-00, § 1, 6-15-00; Ord. No. 6595-00, § 2, 9-7-00; Ord. No. 7413-05, § 4, 5-5-05; Ord. No. 7449-05, § 38,12-15-05; Ord. No. 7605-06, § 22, 4-20-06; Ord. No. 8715-15, § 4, 6-18-15) about:blank 9/23/2015 I aAA, A, 2. 2 -- 2,2,1 203 N Glenwood 203 N Glenwood i. x g �� {, r mfr , � #� ^_ '�• �• . f t 11 _ •� Y fiY 2r.. View looking cast "NOW 8 8 View looking S011th ( I , r") 116-1 IF L- ... . . ......... - ................. ... ..... . ........ ......... . ........ `T � . .......O. zr t, '1 OS/R 52 P11. L V 11Q Irk WIT Not 0� `�4�IWZA (ter Rt".mi 0 270A l�i�mrry t I I I ;, €-., 269B R-548 RD cow ` Y l '—`-35:3 E 2 r.l l^ uIN Gt3 FI —F^ f F � R ' `12 �"•_�a � � a -7 - - PALMETTO ST f h A 724 r w im t 3'1 _ � � c o i 1--+'� 't' �1 E_-1:..�A.• 1 i.�.a'=t _ 3 ST '1 OS/R 52 P11. L V 11Q Irk WIT Not 0� `�4�IWZA (ter Rt".mi 0 270A l�i�mrry --T" t I I I ;, €-., 'e•1 R-548 RD cow ` Y l '—`-35:3 2 r.l l^ uIN Gt3 FI F � R ' `12 �"•_�a � � a -7 f h A 724 r w im t 3'1 --T" t I I I ;, €-., 'e•1 ROSEMERE RD cow ` Y l '—`-35:3 2 r.l l^ uIN Gt3 FI � jai' f f h A nit im _ � � c o i 1--+'� 't' �1 E_-1:..�A.• 1 i.�.a'=t _ 3 ST a CRESTVIEW - oil JACARANDA CIR N , JACARANDA CIR S v 1 1- ST t I I I s> _T ' I f,,;, cow r.l l^ uIN Gt3 FI � WALNUT ST MAPLE ST Rf0GEWOOD c -If --o") � NINE®,all Z - -�, 4 - I 4 WALNUT ST ST ELMWOOD ST IY ` dLl- SpA, g..l... &�: 3 325 _ uIN Gt3 FI � jai' f f h A nit 0 OEM 174 c -If --o") � NINE®,all Z - -�, 4 - I 4 WALNUT ST ST ELMWOOD ST IY ` dLl- SpA, g..l... &�: 3 325 I♦� n MAPLE ST ia _ z Gt3 FI d k�1 jai' f f h A nit I♦� n MAPLE ST ia ��x.rellt 0 Clearwater U Prepared by: Engineering Department Geographic Technology Division 100 S. Myrtle Ave, Clearwater, FL 33756 Ph: (727)562-4750, Fax: (727)526-4755 www.MyCleamater.com Disclaimer.' Public information data is furnished by the City of Clearwater Engineering Department, and must be accepted and used by the recipient with the understanding that the data received was collected for the purpose of developing a graphic infrastructure inventory. As such, the City of Clearwater makes no i—arties, expressed or implied, conceming the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of this data for any other particular use. Furthermore, the City of Clearwater assumes no liability whatsoever associated with the use or misuse of such data. Notice: This map may not incorporate the latest field information. For the most up-to-date depictbn of this infrastructwe, consult the City of Cloonvattes GIS Mapping Applications at: http:ucle—t*rIGlsrMex.asp N VV E 200 100 0 200 s Feet Legend ♦ City Owned Property "colt Transfer of Development Rights ,za<sJ SUB NUMBER (* - Refer to Plat) O BLOCK NUMBER Oi SUB PARCEL NUMBER O PARCEL NUMBER (M&B) LAND HOOK (Common Ownership) I PLATTED SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY COUNTY HIGHWAY O STATE HIGHWAY ,e U.S. HIGHWAY ---- Trails Property with Agreement to Annex: Other ATA - 0 Records Sanitary Only ATA - 0 Records Sanitary & Water ATA - 0 Records Water Only ATA - 0 Records Solid Waste Only ATA - 0 Records ® ATA Outside Chain of Title - 0 Records Unincorporated Enclave Type "A" nincorporated Enclave Type "B" �,-- - ilearwatel Service Area ---------------- Zoning I Le nd�' RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS LDR - Low Density Residential LMDR - Low Medium Density Residential MDR - Medium Density Residential MHDR - Medium High Density Residential HDR - High Density Residential MHP - Mobile Home Park CRNCOD - Coachman Ridge Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District IENCOD - Island Estates Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS SPECIAL USE DISTRICTS O - OfficeIRT - Industrial, Research and Technology T -Tourism I-Instilutuional C - Commercial OS/R - Open Space/Recreational D - Downtown P - Preservation Area Zoning Atlas Updated. 6129/2015 SW 1/4 of 11-29-15 279A d k�1 ��x.rellt 0 Clearwater U Prepared by: Engineering Department Geographic Technology Division 100 S. Myrtle Ave, Clearwater, FL 33756 Ph: (727)562-4750, Fax: (727)526-4755 www.MyCleamater.com Disclaimer.' Public information data is furnished by the City of Clearwater Engineering Department, and must be accepted and used by the recipient with the understanding that the data received was collected for the purpose of developing a graphic infrastructure inventory. As such, the City of Clearwater makes no i—arties, expressed or implied, conceming the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of this data for any other particular use. Furthermore, the City of Clearwater assumes no liability whatsoever associated with the use or misuse of such data. Notice: This map may not incorporate the latest field information. For the most up-to-date depictbn of this infrastructwe, consult the City of Cloonvattes GIS Mapping Applications at: http:ucle—t*rIGlsrMex.asp N VV E 200 100 0 200 s Feet Legend ♦ City Owned Property "colt Transfer of Development Rights ,za<sJ SUB NUMBER (* - Refer to Plat) O BLOCK NUMBER Oi SUB PARCEL NUMBER O PARCEL NUMBER (M&B) LAND HOOK (Common Ownership) I PLATTED SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY COUNTY HIGHWAY O STATE HIGHWAY ,e U.S. HIGHWAY ---- Trails Property with Agreement to Annex: Other ATA - 0 Records Sanitary Only ATA - 0 Records Sanitary & Water ATA - 0 Records Water Only ATA - 0 Records Solid Waste Only ATA - 0 Records ® ATA Outside Chain of Title - 0 Records Unincorporated Enclave Type "A" nincorporated Enclave Type "B" �,-- - ilearwatel Service Area ---------------- Zoning I Le nd�' RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS LDR - Low Density Residential LMDR - Low Medium Density Residential MDR - Medium Density Residential MHDR - Medium High Density Residential HDR - High Density Residential MHP - Mobile Home Park CRNCOD - Coachman Ridge Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District IENCOD - Island Estates Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS SPECIAL USE DISTRICTS O - OfficeIRT - Industrial, Research and Technology T -Tourism I-Instilutuional C - Commercial OS/R - Open Space/Recreational D - Downtown P - Preservation Area Zoning Atlas Updated. 6129/2015 SW 1/4 of 11-29-15 279A ecord Details `d ID: SWO2015-10007 A notice was added to this n Condition: Severity: Notice ,Total conditions: 4 (Noticq. Menu Reports on 2002-05-24. Help wa Page 1 of 2 File Date: 10/05/2015 Application Status: Stop Work Order Application Detail: Detail Application Type: Building/Enforcement/Stop Work Order/SWO Address: 203 N GLENWOOD AVE. CLEARWATER, FL 33755 Owner Name: GEORGE R ALEXANDER Owner Address: 203 N GLENWOOD AVE. CLEARWATER, FL 33755-6025 Application Name: Parcel No: 11-29-15-31194-000-0640 Condition Status: Name Short Comments Status Apply Date 4-203A. 1 - Permit Req... 4-203.A.1 - No person ... Not Met 10/16/2015 47.083 - No Permit 47.083 - Work commenci... Not Met 10/16/2015 47.111 -Required Insp... 47.111 - The permit ho... Not Met 10/16/2015 Acc. Dwelling GARAGE APARTMENT ( ONE... Not Met 05/24/2002 Workflow Status: Task Assigned To Status Status Date Complaint Received In Violation 10/16/2015 Enforcement Notice Of Vi... 10/16/2015 Code Board Final Disposition Licensed Professionals Info: Primary License Number License Type Name Busi Contact Info: Name ........... ........... Organization Name .... ...._ - Contact Type Relationship Description of Work: ***3X FEE*** INSTALLED NEW FENCE WITHOUT PERMIT Job Value: $0.00 Total Fee Assessed: $0.00 Total Fee Invoiced: $0.00 Balance: $0.00 Application Specific Info: SWO Assigned Inspector Atlas Page Gabe Parra 279A Source of Violation Name Phone Num Response RI Anonymous CONDITIONS No Inspections Specifically ADDITION / ALTERATION OF WALL FENCE WITHOUT PERMITS OR INSF Work Without Permits https://ay.prod.myclearwater.comlportletslcaplcapsummarylCapTabSummary.do?mode=t... 10/19/2015 '1411ecord Details Page 2 of 2 https://ay.prod.myclearwater.comlportlets/caplcapsummarylCapTabSummary. do?mode=t... 10/19/2015 c ,-v 0 0 HP 5 Apt 2014 1 A� jr At +.Iv � 4 i f 2. U r, t a do a > ' �s e-- 4 i I R, M ROOM r iA AW n 7 ♦ �� � � ,' �r�AR"'Ad4 rte"-�11If'.�1* �d� < '� ':. i F u y x' S9 7*71, i Record Details Record ID: BIZ2015-00080 A notice was added to this record on 2002-05-24. Condition: Severity: Notice Total conditions: 3 (Notice: 3) View notice Menu Reports Help File Date: 02/17/2015 Application Status: Void Application Detail: Detail Application Type: Code Compliance - Business Code Address: 203 N GLENWOOD AVE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 Owner Name: GEORGE R ALEXANDER Owner Address: 203 N GLENWOOD AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755-6025 Application Name: GEORGE ALEXANDER Parcel No: 11-29-15-31194-000-0640 Contact Info: Name Organization Name Contact Type ......... . .................. GEORGE R ALEXANDER Owner/Business Licensed Professionals Info: Primary License Number License Type Name Description of Work: RENTAL PROPERTY NO BTR Job Value: $0.00 Total Fee Assessed: $0.00 Total Fee Invoiced: $0.00 Balance: $0.00 Application Specific Info: BIZ Assigned Inspector Dee Shawen Source of Violation Dee Shawen Violation Category Business Tax Page 1 of 2 Relationshir Busi Specifically RENTAL PROPERTY/ BUSINESS TAX RECEIPT REQUIRED: Based on a search of public records, this n SIGNS IN THE ROW Message Phone Number https://ay.prod.myclearwater.comlportletslcaplcapsummarylCapTabSummary.do?mode=ta... 8/13/2015 F 10 Record Details Page 2 of 2 Website VIOLATIONS Violation Category Violation Detail Biz Tax 29.30(1) - BTR Required Biz Tax 3-2302. - Res Rental BTR ROW SIGNS Date Sent Amt Due (Money) Date Paid Amt Paid (Money) NTA Status Inspector Location Please enter all information accurately Workflow Status: Task Assigned To Status Status Date Complaint Received Courtesy Let... 02/17/2015 Courtesy Phase Void 03/25/2015 Enforcement Code Board Court Condition Status: Name Short Comments Status Apply Date Biz Tax - 29.30(1) - B... 29.30(1) - -BUSINESS ... Not Met 02/17/2015 Biz Tax - 3-2302. - Re... 3-2302. - "RESIDENTIA... Not Met 02/17/2015 Acc. Dwelling GARAGE APARTMENT ( ONE... Not Met 05/24/2002 Application Comments: View ID Comment Date https://ay.prod.myclearwater.comlportletslcaplcapsummarylCapTabSummary.do?mode=ta... 8/13/2015 Record Details Record ID: BCP2015-03514 A notice was added to this record on 2002-05-24. Condition: Severity: Notice Total conditions: 1 (Notice: 1) View notice Page 1 of 4 Menu Reports Help File Date: 03/20/2015 Application Status: Completed Application Detail: Detail Application Type: Building - Construction Permit Address: 203 N GLENWOOD AVE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 Owner Name: GEORGE R ALEXANDER Owner Address: 203 N GLENWOOD AVE. CLEARWATER, FL 33755-6025 Application Name: GEORGE ALEXANDER Parcel No: 11-29-15-31194-000-0640 Condition Status: Name Short Comments Status Apply Date Acc. Dwelling GARAGE APARTMENT ( ONE... Not Met 05/24/2002 Workflow Status: Task Assigned To Status Status Date Application Submittal Route to Review 03/20/2015 Mechanical Review Plumbing Review Engineering Review Environmental Review Land Resources Review Gas Review Planning Review Fire Review Traffic Engineering Re... Stormwater Review Parks and Recreation R... Art Review Utility Review Building Review Approve 03/20/2015 Electrical Review Approve 03/20/2015 Permit Verification Issue 03/20/2015 Active Permit Completed 04/08/2015 Licensed Professionals Info: Primary License Number License Type Name Bu; Yes CBC1260161 Contractor RICHARD GARDNER PHI ER13014908 Contractor DAVAN MILFORD GU Contact Info: Name ...... ..... .......... Organization Name ......... Contact Type _ . Relationship Description of Work: SW0201502016 - BUILD PARTITION FOR STORAGE AREA Job Value:5$ 00.00 Total Fee Assessed: $141.89 Total Fee Invoiced: https://ay.prod.myclearwater.comlportletslcaplcapsummarylCapTabSummary.do?mode=ta... 8/13/2015 Record Details $141.89 Balance: $0.00 Application Specific Info: BCP1 Bin Number Atlas Page 279A Type of Permit Replacement Type of Owner Private Structure Use 1 & 2 Family Residence Proposed Structure Use 1 & 2 Familv Residence WORK INCLUDES BLD ELE PLM J J ROOF GAS C -G Walk-Thru Yes Fee Type Buildino Code - Residential Dwelling Yes MEC Number of Trades 2 Sets of Drawings Submitted 1 Need Tree Permit No Tree Verification Required BCP4 FEMA Flood Zone NAVD X Unshaded - Outside 500 Yr Flood Structure Value (Prior to Improvement) Elevation Certificate Required Elevation Certificate Not Required (Check One) UNS - Mandatory Improvement Improvement Less Than 50 Percent Not Located in Flood Zone Panel Number Page 2 of 4 PERMIT DATES Received 03/20/2015 Issued 03/20/2015 Finaled 04/08/2015 STRUCTUREINFO Stories Living Area 0 Garage -Carport 0 Commercial 0 Other 0 Total Area 0 Te E) 1C Occ Desi Con A/C TRE Nurr Nurr Rep Nurr Calil Defi, Rep https:Hay.prod.myclearwater. comlportlets/caplcapsummarylCapTabSummary. do?mode=ta... 8/13/2015 Record Details Page 3 of 4 t Elevations (FT) App Base Flood Flood Notes - Under Construction Finished BCPS Project Type SF Detached SF Attached Duplex -Triplex Apartment Condo Mobile Home Retail Office Manufacturing Downtown Density Pool - Hotel Reserve Hotel Rooms Affordable Housing Units Downtown Density School Board Status School Board Application Date School Board Approval Date BCP7 Fire Protection Systems - All Alarm Armover Nt Nt LP Storage Cylinders Flam-Comb Hood Nt Fire Supp Ansul Liquid Storage Standpipe Systems - Nt Pre -Eng Supp Fixed Hotwork Fuel Tank Nt Nt Underground Fire Lines Fire Pumps Tank Removal Ni Alarm Fee - Tank Fee 3rd Plan Review Fee BCP8 Location of Work Description of Work Starting Date Ending Date https://ay.prod.myclearwater.comlportletslcaplcapsummarylCapTabSummary.do?mode=ta... 8/13/2015 Record Details n Brick Paver Landscaping PLAN REVIEW Review Type Comment Page 4 of 4 FENCE Material Height (Number) Length (Number) Landscaping Application Comments: View ID Comment Date ........ ............. ................. ................. https:Hay.prod.myclearwater.com/portlets/cap/capsummary/CapTabSummary.do?mode=ta... 8/13/2015 C M Ma R' 0 '0 ondi ibn' il C161, "dlfti h: Hist''llry .ondition, Name koc. Dwelling. 'tatus NotblElt(Appl V 4 1 t bort Comments M,Sta:ndard Comment GAF E TSS EN I T ONE, lif-'ATEA METER IN 198 6) -'J rt, 40 V "W Pinellas County Property Apr er Page 1 of 1 PAM DUBOV CFA, CAE Meet Pam Property Appraiser HOME Search Our Database Appraisal Info Forms/Applications Change of Address Form Exemption / Save -Our - Homes / Portability How to Estimate Taxes Tangible Personal Property Downloads/Reports/Maps', Truth In Millage Glossary / FAQ's Additional information Links / Florida Property Appraisers MissionNisionNalues Employment Contact Us Tax Encamps fiN Qll�I�fA� �C�iiB4" IMA http://www.pcpao.org/?pg=http://www.pepao.org/general.php?strap=152911311940000640 6/25/2015 Property/Land Use Description Code (DOR code) I 0000 Vacant Residential - lot & acreage less than 5 acres 0030 Vacant Condo (development land) 0033 IVacant PUD 0040 Vacant Condo Rec Area Dev Own- w/possible XFSB 0060 Mobile Home, Vacant - individual lot owners in a platted subdivision 0061 Mobile Home Park Subdivision, Vacant 0090 Vacant Residential Land w/XFSB 0110 Single Family Home 0133 Planned Unit Development 0260 Mobile Home, with improvement - individual lot owners in a subdivision Mobile Home -Improved w/ condo or co - 0261 op. Individual or assn owned -in recorded sub or unrecorded MH pk 0310 Apartments (50 units or more) 0311 Apartments (10 units to 49 units) 0430 Condominium 0431 Condominium (lease only) 0435 Condo Parking Space, Garage Space, Storage Units, Cabanas 0436 Condo Conversion - apartments/Platted Condo with apartment use 0442 Interval Ownership 0443 Time Share 0550 CO-OP Apartments 0752 Miscellaneous Residential - boarding house, etc. ALF less than 10 units 0810 Single Family - more than one house per parcel 0820 Duplex-Triplex-Fourplex 0822 Apartment House -Boarding House (5-9 units) ? 0904 Condo Common Area Assn Own - f open/green space (939) Subdivision common area - open/green 0905space, 7 assn owned (938 -all Dept except TWIT W A • QIQ_NAT W A T)P„t iic,- IMA http://www.pcpao.org/?pg=http://www.pepao.org/general.php?strap=152911311940000640 6/25/2015 Property Appraiser General 1, nation Page 1 of 4 Interactive Map of this parcel Sales Quen- Back to Query Results New Search Tax Collector Home Pale Contact is WM 11-29-15-31194-000-0640 71 Compact Property Record Card Portability Data Current as of June Radius Improvement Value Calculator 2592015 Email Print Search per F.S. 553.844 Ownership/Mailing Address Chan2c Site Address MailingAddress Most Recent ALEXANDER, GEORGE R 203 N GLENWOOD AVE 203 N GLENWOOD AVE CLEARWATER CLEARWATER FL 33755-6025 Sales Comparison Property Use: 0110 (Single Family Home) [click here to hide] Legal Description GLENWOOD LOT 64 Mortgage Letter File for Homestead 2015 Parcel Use Living Units: 1 [ Exemption 11 2015 11 2016 1 Homestead: 11 No No Homestead Use Percentage: 0.00% Government: No No I Non -Homestead Use Percentage: 100.00% Institutional: I No 11 No Classified Agricultural: No Historic: No No Parcel Information Latest Notice of Proposed Property Taxes (TRIM Notice) 17456/1745 $217,400 Sales 121030265003 NON EVAC 008/014 uer 2014 Final Value Information Evacuation Zone School Most Recent Value SOH Cap Taxable Value Taxable Value Taxable Value 2014 $195,167 $149,212 $149,212 Plat Recording Sales Comparison Census Tract (NOT the same as a FEMA Book/Page Year Value/ Exemption Value Taxable Value Taxable Taxable Value SOH Cap Value Flood Zone $195,167 17456/1745 $217,400 Sales 121030265003 NON EVAC 008/014 uer 2014 Final Value Information Year Just/Market Assessed Value/ CO2DII School Municipal. Value SOH Cap Taxable Value Taxable Value Taxable Value 2014 $195,167 $149,212 $149,212 $195,167 $149,212 [click here to hide] Value History as Certified (yellow indicates correction on file) Assessed County Homestead Just/Market School Municipal Year Value/ Exemption Value Taxable Value Taxable Taxable Value SOH Cap Value 2014 No $195,167 $149,212 $149,212 $195,167 $149,212 http://www.pepao.org/general.php?strap=152911311940000640 6/25/2015 Property Appraiser General L enation 2013 No $135,647 $135,647 2012 Yes $175,354 $153,150 2011 Yes $160,928 $148,689 2010 Yes $168,597 $146,492 2009 Yes $216,065 $142,641 2008 Yes $229,600 $142,499 2007 Yes $288,300 $139,465 2006 Yes $404,200 $136,063 2005 Yes $246,500 $132,100 2004 Yes $246,300 $128,300 2003 Yes $191,100 $125,900 2002 Yes $157,400 $123,000 2001 Yes $147,700 $121,100 2000 Yes $135,500 $117,600 1999 Yes $128,600 $114,600 1998 Yes $116,900 $112,800 1997 Yes $111,800 $111,000 1996 Yes $115,000 $107,800 2014 Tax Information Click Here for 2014 Tax Bill Tax District: CW Tax Collector Mails 2014 Tax Bills October 31 2014 Final Millage Rate 21.2599 2014 Est Taxes w/o Cap or $4,149.23 Exemptions A significant change in taxable value may occur when sold due to changes in the market or the removal of exemptions. Click here for more information. Sal 06 Jan 17456 / 1745 ® $150,000 Q I 2012 22 Dec 07160 / 0610 ® $93,000 Q 1 1989 03600/ $22,100 Q 0634 0 Page 2 of 4 $1.35,647 $135,647 $135,647 $103,150 $128,150 $103,150 $98,689 $123,689 $98,689 $96,492 $121,492 $96,492 $92,641 $117,641 $92,641 $92,499 $117,499 $92,4991 $114,465 N/A $114,465 $111,063 N/A $111,063 $107,100 N/A $107,100 $103,300 N/A $103,300 $100,900 N/A $100,900 $98,000 N/A $98,000 $96,100 N/A $96,100 $92,600 N/A $92,600 $89,600 N/A $89,600 $87,800 N/A $87,800 $86,000 N/A $86,000 $82,800 N/A $82,800 Ranked Sales (what are Ranked Sales?) See all transactions e Date Book/Page Price Q/U VII 2014 Land Information Seawall: No Frontage: None View: Land Unit Total Adjusted Land Use Units Method Size Value Adjustments Value Single Family 124x131 985.00 124.0000 0.9657 $117,951 FF (01) [click here to hide] 2015 Building 1 Structural Elements Back to Ton Site Address: 203 N GLENWOOD AVE Quality: Average Square Footage: 3628.00 Foundation: Continuous Footing http://www.pcpao.org/general.php?strap=152911311940000640 6/25/2015 Property Appraiser General hnation Page 3 of 4 Floor System: Wood Exterior Wall: Masonry Brick Roof Frame: Gable Or Hip 1 t Roof Cover: Shingle 21 LAF Composition e Stories: 1 Living units: 1 to Floor Finish: �1� Carpet/Hardtile/Hardwood1z `L26 GRF 14 Interior Finish: Drywall/Plasterts--' Fixtures:9 to BAF tb Year Built: 1941 �2` ' Effective Age: 32 Heating: Central Duct Cooling: Cooling (Central) Description Open Porch Lower Area Finished. Garage Basement Base Semi -finished Base 1� zt BSF to I. 1 -ss -- Building 1 Sub Area Information Livine Area Ft Gross Area Ft 0 60 366 366 0 702 0 598 672 672 1,230 1,230 Total Living SF: 2,268 Total Gross SF: 3,628 Factor 0.20 0.70 0.35 0.30 0.80 1.00 Total Effec [click here to hide] 2015 Extra Features Description Value/Unit Units Total Value as New Depreciated FIREPLACE $6,000.00 1.00 $6,000.00 $2,4 PATIO/DECK $30.00 252.00 $7,560.00 $3,7 [click here to hide] Permit Data 11 Permit information is received from the County and Cities. This data may be incomplete and may exclude permits that do not result in field reviews (for example for water heater replacement permits). We are required to list all improvements, which may include unpermitted construction. Any questions regarding permits, or the status of non -permitted improvements, should be directed to the permitting office in which the structure is located. Permit Number Description Issue Date I Estimated Value BCP2012-09328 11 ROOF 18 Sep 2012 $4,901 BCP2008-06265 SPECIAL USE 08 Jul 2008 $10,001 BCP2008-03136 11 HEAT/AIR 11 09 Apr 2006-8-11 $5,601 http://www.pcpao.org/general.php?strap=152911311940000640 6/25/2015 Property Apprai3er Genem-1 I, -nas:)-i Page 4 of 4 Interactive rlikof } is parcel Man ,ales Bad :, Quer Neti Tax Col ector Tone Contact Leae>J cover, Reszlts Seai-rh Page Us http://www.p-.-mac-r�/gene-a_.php?strap=- 52911= _ 1940000-3-0 6/25/015 I#: 2012007567 BK: 17456 F 1745, 01/10/2012 at 10:58 AM 'CORDING 2 PAGES ., $18..50 D DOC STAMP COLLECT_ _ _4 $1050.00 KEN BURKE, CLERK G.. COURT PINELLAS COUNTY, FL BY DEPUTY CLERK: CLKDMCS Prepared by: Leah Negri Star Title Partners of Palm Harbor, LLC 35095 US Highway 19 North, Suite 102 Palm Harbor, Florida 34684 File Number. PHSS11772 General Warranty Deed - Made this January 6, 2012 A.D. By Eileen F. Pearson f/k/a Eileen F. Meyers -Pearson a\gingle vybman, whose address is: 2025 Arbor Lane, Clearwater, Florida 33763, hereinafter called the graf�tor, to G.�,orge-R: Alexander, whose post office address is: 203 N. Glenwood Ave, Clearwater, Florida 33755, hI reinafter'called the grantee: (Whenever used herein the term "grantor" and "grantee" include all the parties tb-this instrtunent and the heirs, legal representatives and assigns of individuals, and successors and assigns of corporations) ,'> Witnesseth, that the grantor, for and in consideration of the suii:Y co f Ten Dollars, ($10.00) and other valuable considerations, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, *fir y grants, bargains, sells, aliens, remises, releases, conveys and confirms unto the grantee, all that aertairr land'sivate in Pinellas County, Florida, viz: > Lot 64, Glenwood Subdivision, agco'rding to;the plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 8, Page 14, of the Public Records 6f,Pija�I! s .County, Florida. Parcel ID Number: 1129153119411600640' > Together with all the tenements, heeeditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. - To Have and.to H61d, the same in fee simple forever. And the -grantor �iereby covenants with said grantee that the grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that, fihe gfiantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land; that the grantor hereby fully warranfs,' titl�,to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever; and that -said land is free'of all encumbrances except taxes accruing subsequent to December 31, 2011. Page 1 of 2 DEED Individual Warranty Deed - Legal on Face Closers' Choice PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF. REC K 17456 PG 1746 Prepared by: Leah Negri Star Title Partners of Palm Harbor, LLC 35095 US Highway 19 North, Suite 102 Palm Harbor, Florida 34684 File Number: PHSS 11772 In Witness Whereof, written. the said grantor has signed and sealed these presents the day andNarjirst above Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence: (Seal) Eileen F. Pearson f/k/a Eileen E: Meyers -Pearson Address: 2025 Arbef Lane, Clearwater, Florida 33763 , The foregoing instrument was acknowledofl before ,n' this January 6, 2012, by Eileen F. Pearson f/k/a Eileen F. Meyers -Pearson, a single woman, 'A/are \ _�ersonally known to me or who has produced 0,identi`hdation. "0 ou4 Notary Public StffieAf Florida ro' Leah Negri �029800 o` My compfssion E (.Seal �iioif�o° Ex Ores 19f13(20M C�4t& 11, _�_- . Gpia, DEED Individual Warranty Deed - Legal on Face Closers' Choice Page 2 of 2