Loading...
04/17/2018 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING MINUTES CITY OF CLEARWATER April 17, 2018 Present: Vice Chair Michael Boutzoukas, Board Member Christopher J. Anuszkiewicz, Board Member Mike Flanery, Board Member John Quattrocki, Board Member Brian Barker, Board Member Jordan Behar, Acting Board Member Reed Haydon Absent: Board Member Mary A. Lau Also Present: Jay Daigneault - Attorney for the Board, Michael L. Delk - Planning & Development Director, Gina Clayton - Assistant Planning & Development Director, Patricia O. Sullivan - Board Reporter A. CALL TO ORDER, INVOCATION, PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Vice Chair called the meeting to order at 1:00 p.m. at City Hall, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. To provide continuity for research, items are in agenda order although not necessarily discussed in that order. B. ROLL CALL: C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING: March 20, 2018 Member Barker moved to approve the minutes of the March 20, 2018 Community Development Board meeting as submitted in written summation. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. D. ELECTION OF OFFICERS Member Anuszkiewicz moved to appoint Michael Boutzoukas as Chair. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Acting Member Haydon moved to appoint Christopher Anuszkiewicz as Vice Chair. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. E. CITIZENS TO BE HEARD RE ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA John Funk said he had withdrawn his application for reappointment to the CDB (Community Development Board). He recommended the Board hold evening Community Development 4/17/2018 1 meetings and work sessions for introduction/discussion of upcoming development plans, etc. He said the Complete Streets program was important. Mr. Funk was thanked for his service on the CDB. Patricia Noxon said the Realtor did not provide her sufficient information about her co-op before purchase, the land lease owner was suing the Drew Gardens homeowners association and all co-op owners, and onsite problems included drugs and gangs, she and her mother were attacked, and she was being monitored. She asked CDB to correct problems or direct her to someone in the City who could. Assistant Planning and Development Director Gina Clayton said Code Enforcement had inspected the property and issued notices of violation. It was stated the CDB did not have oversite over Drew Gardens. It was suggested Ms. Noxon seek legal counsel. F. REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE (Items 1-4) (Continue to May 15, 2018): 1. Level Three Application Case: LUP2017-09004 — Properties in the Downtown Gateway and Prospect Lake Character Districts (Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan Area) Owner: Not Applicable; City of Clearwater Initiated Amendment Applicant: City of Clearwater (100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756; phone: 727-562-4626; email: kyle.brotherton @myclearwater.com) Location: 175.148 acres, comprised of 969 properties in the Community Redevelopment Area (CRA) as expanded in 2003, generally located east of Prospect Avenue, south of Drew Street, north of Court Street, and west of Highland Avenue, and one property located on the southeast corner of Chestnut Street and Myrtle Avenue Request: The Community Development Board (CDB) is reviewing a request to amend the Future Land Use Map designation from seven different future land use categories to the Central Business District (CBD) category and making a recommendation to City Council. Neighborhood Associations: Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition, Country Club Addition Neighbors, Clearwater Downtown Neighborhood Association, Glen Oaks Park, Hillcrest Neighbors, Skycrest Neighborhood Association, Creekside Manor I & 11 & East Gateway Business and Neighbors Association. Presenter: Kyle Brotherton, Senior Planner See below for motion to continue. Community Development 4/17/2018 2 2. Level Three Application Case: REZ2017-09005 — Properties in the Downtown Gateway and Prospect Lake Districts (Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan Area) Owner: Not Applicable; City of Clearwater Initiated Amendment Applicant: City of Clearwater (100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756; phone: 727-562-4626; email: kyle.brotherton @myclearwater.com) Location: 175.148 acres, comprised of 969 properties in the Community Redevelopment Area (CRA) as expanded in 2003, generally located east of Prospect Avenue, south of Drew Street, north of Court Street, and west of Highland Avenue, and one property located on the southeast corner of Chestnut Street and Myrtle Avenue Request: The Community Development Board (CDB) is reviewing a request to amend the Zoning Atlas from eight different zoning districts to the Downtown (D) District and making a recommendation to City Council. Neighborhood Associations: Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition, Country Club Addition Neighbors, Clearwater Downtown Neighborhood Association, Glen Oaks Park, Hillcrest Neighbors, Skycrest Neighborhood Association, Creekside Manor I & 11 & East Gateway Business and Neighbors Association. Presenter: Kyle Brotherton, Senior Planner See below for motion to continue. 3. Level Three Application Case: LUP2017-09005 — Properties within the Old Bay Character District Expansion Area (Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan Area) Owner: Not Applicable; City of Clearwater Initiated Amendment Applicant: City of Clearwater (100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756; phone: 727-562-4626; email: kyle.brotherton @myclearwater.com) Location: 10.848 acres generally located north of Nicholson Street, west of the Pinellas Trail, east of Clearwater Harbor, and within 285 feet of Cedar Street Request: The Community Development Board (CDB) is reviewing a request to amend the Future Land Use Map designation from Commercial General (CG), Residential Urban (RU), and Institutional (1) categories to the Central Business District (CBD) category and making a recommendation to City Council. Neighborhood Associations: Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition, Old Clearwater Bay Neighborhood Association Presenter: Kyle Brotherton, Senior Planner See below for motion to continue. Community Development 4/17/2018 3 4. Level Three Application Case: REZ2017-09006 — Properties within the Old Bay Character District Expansion Area (Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan Area) Owner: Not Applicable; City of Clearwater Initiated Amendment Applicant: City of Clearwater (100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater FL 33756; phone: 727-562-4626; email: kyle.brotherton @myclearwater.com) Location: 10.848 acres generally located north of Nicholson Street, west of the Pinellas Trail, east of Clearwater Harbor, and within 285 feet of Cedar Street Request: The Community Development Board (CDB) is reviewing a request to amend the Zoning Atlas from the Commercial (C), Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) and Institutional (1) Districts to the Downtown (D) District and making a recommendation to City Council. Neighborhood Associations: Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition, Old Clearwater Bay Neighborhood Association Presenter: Kyle Brotherton, Senior Planner Acting Member Hayden moved to continue Cases LUP2017-09004, REZ2017- 090057 LUP2017-09005, and REZ2017-09006 to May 15, 2018. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. G. CONTINUED FROM THE MARCH 20, 2018 (ITEMS 1-2): 1. Level Three Application Case: LUP2018-02001 — 3474 Aspen Trail, 3490 and 3492 Lake Shore Lane Owner: Friedel B. Roddey Family Trust, Benjamin Roddey III Trustee Agent: Benjamin Roddey IV (75 North Woodward Avenue No. 88120, Tallahassee, FL 32313; phone: 813-508-2163; email: ben(a)-serene.me) Location: 9.20-acre portion of a 24.46-acre parcel located at the southwest corner of Curlew Road and Lake Shore Lane Request: The Community Development Board (CDB) is reviewing a request to amend the Future Land Use Map designation for a 9.20-acre portion of property from Transportation Utility (T/U) and Preservation (P) (Pinellas County) to Residential Low (RL) and Transportation/Utility (T/U) Overlay (City of Clearwater) upon annexation into the City (ANX2017-12026) and making a recommendation to City Council. Neighborhood Associations: Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition, Wynwoods Landing HOA Presenter: Lauren Matzke, AICP, Long Range Planning Manager Long Range Planning Manager Lauren Matzke reviewed the Staff report. A site plan was not submitted. In response to questions, Ms. Matzke said the site plan would indicate if walls were planned. The applicant submitted the map with the lines and pond. She did not know Community Development 4/17/2018 4 the origin of the pond classified by SWFWMD (Southwest Florida Water Management District) as a stormwater feature; it had a drainage easement. The City Council considered annexation applications. If annexed, the City would be the applicant requesting the County to amend the Future Land Use Plan. The stormwater plan could be adjusted by other agencies during development review. Traffic Engineer Analyst Dave Larremore said Pinellas County would permit onsite roads and any connection to Curlew Road. Ron Beemiller, representing the applicant, said the Roddey Family had owned the property for several generations. He estimated the development would have 30 37000 - 4,000 square-foot houses equal to or better than nearby homes. He said they met with Trails of Countryside residents and were working to alleviate their concerns, including working with Ms. Matzke on managing ingress/egress. He said the project would develop the southern and western portions of the property and the brick wall would extend around the property. Paul Keleti, President of Trails of Countryside HOA, expressed concerns the 7 property owners had not submitted paperwork authorizing the applicant to act as their agent, the wetland report did not state the pond had been mischaracterized as Preservation, SWFWMD required 15 — 25 foot setbacks from conservation areas, and he read a list of conservation area types and the City's intent and purpose of protecting waters. He said Mrs. Roddey's obituary mentioned her final days shared with the land and birds. He opposed changing the pond's Preservation designation. Discussion ensued with comments the site plan would address setbacks and overall boundaries, the stormwater feature was not described as a wetland and may be modified as new land uses would increase runoff, and the request was to develop 9.2 acres on the 24 acre site. Concerns were expressed the lake could have been created by sinking land, it appeared to be historic wetlands, and support was expressed for retaining the Preservation designation. In response to questions, Environmental Specialist III Sarah Kessler said impacts on the lake could not be determined without a site plan. Setbacks from stormwater ponds were required. She agreed with the outside consultant's report that the pond was mischaracterized as Preservation. The lake was not isolated and was considered "other surface water," a generic term referencing a body of water with water coming from a number of places including roads and drainage. The pond had some wetland functions with birds and fish. SWFWMD's classification would not change. Planning & Development Director Michael Delk said documentation appeared to be in order but staff would review it. The development would require stormwater permits. Benjamin Roddey, representing the applicant, said the other grantees had provided him authority to pursue this application via Power of Attorney. Community Development 4/17/2018 5 Member Anuszkiewicz moved to recommend approval of Case LUP2018-02001 based on the evidence and testimony presented in the application, the Staff Report and at today's hearing, and hereby adopt the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law stated in the Staff Report. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. 2. Level Three Application Case: REZ2017-12013 — 3474 Aspen Trail, 3490 and 3492 Lake Shore Lane Owner: Friedel B. Roddey Family Trust, Benjamin Roddey III Trustee Agent: Benjamin Roddey IV (75 North Woodward Avenue No. 88120, Tallahassee, FL 32313; phone: 813-508-2163; email: ben(a)serene.me) Location: 24.46 acres located at the southwest corner of Curlew Road and Lake Shore Lane Request: The Community Development Board (CDB) is reviewing a request to amend the Zoning Atlas from the A-E Agricultural Estate Residential and R-3 Single Family Residential Districts (Pinellas County) to the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District upon annexation into the City (ANX2017-12026) and making a recommendation to City Council. Neighborhood Associations: Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition, Wynwoods Landing HOA Presenter: Lauren Matzke, AICP, Long Range Planning Manager Ms. Matzke requested that testimony for Case LUP2018-02001 be part of this companion piece. She reviewed the Staff report. In response to questions, Ms. Matzke reviewed LMDR (Low-Medium Density Residential) standards. The water feature was excluded when determining density. Ms. Clayton said a 30-unit development was proposed; 46 units could be permitted. LDR (Low Density Residential) lots could be flexed down to 10,000 square-feet. Paul Keleti, President of Trails of Countryside HOA, said the development conflicted with the surrounding neighborhood character. He said the current A-E designation allowed 1 dwelling per 2 acres and expressed concern the request would increase density 10-fold and increase traffic. He said his subdivision would not be buffered from the development. He said LDR would be a more appropriate zoning similar to neighboring properties. Concern was expressed that after the zoning was changed, the property could be sold and developed with 46 units. It was suggested lots south of the subject property appeared smaller than 20,000 square-feet. It was felt higher density was appropriate for land close to a road. It was noted the request was consistent with the 6 listed CDC (Community Development Code) standards in the Staff Report. Community Development 4/17/2018 6 Member Barker moved to recommend approval of Case REZ2017-12013 based on the evidence and testimony presented in the application, the Staff Report and at today's hearing, and hereby adopt the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law stated in the Staff Report. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. H. CONSENT AGENDA: The following case is not contested by the applicant, staff, neighboring property owners, etc. and will be approved by a single vote at the beginning of the meeting: (Item 1) 1. Case: FLD2018-01004 — 651 Old Coachman Road Level Two Application Owner: City of Clearwater (Kevin Dunbar, Director; Parks and Recreation Department) Agent: Brian Barker; Duel & Associates (565 South Hercules Avenue Clearwater, FL 33764; phone: (727) 535-7090; email: briana-deuelengineering.com) Location: 51.01 acres (38.71 acres - City; 12.30 acres - Duke Energy) consisting of two parcels generally at the northwest corner of US 19 North and Drew Street. Atlas Page: 281 B Zoning: Institutional (1), Preservation (P), Open Space/Recreation (OS/R) and US 19 - Regional Center (US 19-RC) Districts Request: The Community Development Board is reviewing an amendment to existing Level 11 Flexible Development approvals (FLD2002-07021, FLD2002- 07021A, FLD2002-07021 B, FLD2004-07055 and FLD2004-07055A) for an existing Sporting Facility (Spectrum Field) within the Institutional (1), Open Space/ Recreation (OS/R), Preservation (P) and US-19 Regional Center (US 19-RC) Districts. The site consists of two parcels generally addressed as 651 Old Coachman Road. The proposal includes adding a 105-unit dormitory and dining hall building and a second floor addition to an existing clubhouse and requests allowable flexibility with regard to setbacks, height and landscaping (CDC Sections 2-1404.A and 3-1202.G); and a two-year Development Order under the provisions of CDC Section 4-407). Neighborhood Association: Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition. Presenter: Mark T. Parry, AICP, Senior Planner Members Anuszkiewicz and Barker declared conflicts of interest. Acting Member Haydon moved to approve Case FLD2018-01004 on today's Consent Agenda based on evidence in the record, including the application and the Staff Report, and hereby adopt the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law stated in the Staff Report, with conditions of approval as listed. The motion was duly seconded. Members Flanery, Quattrocki, Behar, Vice Chair Boutzoukas and Acting Member Haydon voted "Aye"; Members Anuszkiewicz and Barker abstained. Motion carried. Community Development 4/17/2018 7 H. DIRECTOR'S REPORT 1. Update on the new Downtown Zoning District and Development Standards Senior Planner Kyle Brotherton reviewed proposed Downtown Zoning District and Development Standards. In March, the City Council approved the Downtown Plan Vision: 1) urban core & heart of City; 2) center of business & government; and 3) attractive place to live, work, shop, and play, featuring: 1) quality urban design; 2) high quality public realm; and 3) dense and livable pattern. The form-based code streamlined the development review process, incorporated design standards into the Code, and eliminated most parking requirements. Character district standards - density (35 - 75 dwelling units/acre), intensity (0.5 — 4 Floor Area Ratio), height (35 feet - unlimited), residential and nonresidential uses, parking requirements limited to residential uses, and approval process via building construction permit and/or Community Development Coordinator approval. Building frontage type locations regulated by street types. Examples: 1) PURPLE - Cleveland Street; 2) RED - Myrtle Avenue; 3) PINK - Drew Street; 4) BLUE - Missouri Avenue; 5) ORANGE— Garden Avenue; and 6) YELLOW— Laura Street. PURPLE, RED & PINK streets with high levels of pedestrian activity - Storefront 1 Building Frontage - minimum 16-foot ground floor height, windows on 65% of front fagade, 0 — 3 foot front setback as streetscape extension, front entries to individual tenants, parking behind building. RED & PINK streets with high levels of pedestrian activity - Urban Residential 1 Building Frontage - ground floor units above grade elevation, 3 — 5 foot front setbacks for stoops/landscaping, front entries to individual units, parking behind building. PINK streets with moderate pedestrian activity - Storefront 2 Building Frontage - minimum 16-foot ground floor height, windows on 50% of front fagade, 0 — 3 foot front setback as streetscape extension, front entries to individual tenants, parking to side and behind building. BLUE streets in areas with mixed building types - Workshop/Flex Building Frontage - windows on 40% of front fagade, 5 — 10 foot front setback with landscape beds and walkways to entries, front entries to individual tenants or common lobbies with thresholds that may be above grade, parking to side and behind building. Community Development 4/17/2018 8 BLUE streets in areas with mixed building types - Urban Residential 2 Building Frontage - ground floor units above grade elevation, 5 — 15 foot front setback with landscape beds and walkways to individual or common entries, parking behind building. ORANGE streets in areas with mixed residential types - Neighborhood Infill Building Frontage - ground floor units above grade elevation, 5 — 15 foot front setback with modest landscaping, porches, or stoops, front entries to ground floor units or common lobbies, parking behind building. YELLOW streets in areas with single family residential and duplexes - Neighborhood Conservation Building Frontage - 20-foot minimum front setback accommodating driveway for parking. Site design standards being drafted considered development pattern of street grids, lots, and blocks, access and circulation re curb cuts, pedestrian circulation, and connection to trails, parking, service area, bike parking, landscaping, fencing, walls, and open space. Building design standards considered attached dwelling types such as duplex, townhouse, carriage house, etc., architectural standards, quality of materials, and historic building standards. Standards will be presented to the Downtown Development Board in May, CDB in June, and City Council in July/August for an August 2, 2018 effective date. Mr. Brotherton said parking was expensive (approximately $18,000 per parking garage space); the market and developers would dictate projects' parking needs. The proposal received considerable public input at a public meeting on March 28, 2018 at the Main Library. Slight changes were planned prior to adoption. Concern was expressed that street trees were an important part of standards and should be required in rights-of-way. Mr. Delk said historically the City requested developers to install streetscaping in front of the development. The CRA (Community Redevelopment Agency) Director did not want to wait for private development to improve the public realm in every case. It was hoped the City planned additional landscaping. It was stated that Cleveland Street was a great example of installing streetscaping all at once rather than piecemeal. Dislike was expressed for Cleveland Street bike lanes. It was suggested that residential units have room for backyard gardens. Support was expressed for additional workshops. Community Development 4/17/2018 9 In response to questions, Mr. Brotherton said form -based code regulated building placement and its interaction with pedestrians and the street; the current code was use - based. Ms. Clayton said a place to store cars was being established. Lenders would not finance projects with insufficient parking. Form -based code was used for more than 30 years. Mr. Delk said Clearwater wanted to create an urban environment downtown where 100s of small properties existed. The Code would have minimal obstacles to attract investment and allow the private sector free range to respond to the market. Larger projects would want to park themselves. Staff was thanked for a great presentation. J. ADJOURN The meeting adjourned at 2:45 p.m. , Eimer- Chair Community Develop ent Board Community Development 4/17/2018 10 FORM 8B MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT FOR COUNTY, MUNICIPAL, AND OTHER LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS LAS NAME —FIRST NAME — MIDDLE NAME isc 10 (all"'I S4,0 IL2 'PIS NAME OF BOARD, COUNCIL COMMISSION, AUTHORITY, OR COMMITTEE C.D MAILING ADDRESS I �� ��, `^ A �5 �J r JI� ✓j,L)�V THE BOARD, C CIL, COMMISSION, AUTHORITY OR COMMITTEE ON WHICH 1 SERVE IS OF: ❑CITY ❑COUNTY 0 OTHER LOCAL AGENCY CITY'f•, 61-404 , _ n COUNTY NAME OF POLITICAL SUBDIVISION: DATE ON,419H OCr Rf�•D 1 (7/"L)�/��(j/� MY POSITION IS: 0 ELECTIVE APPOINTIVE WHO MUST FILE FORM 8B This fbrm is for use by any person serving at.the county, city, or other local level of government on an appointed or elected board, council, commission, authority, or committee. It applies to members of advisory and non - advisory bodies who are presented with a voting conflict of interest under Section 112.3143, Florida Statutes. Your responsibilities under the law when faced with voting on a measure in which you have a conflict of interest will vary greatly depending on whether you hold an elective or appointive position. For this reason, please pay close attention to the instructions on this form before completing and filing the form. INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 112.3143, FLORIDA STATUTES A person holding elective or appointive county, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which would inure to his or her special private gain or loss. Each elected or appointed local officer also MUST ABSTAIN from knowingly voting on a measure which would inure to the special gain or Toss of a principal (other than a government agency) by whom he or she is retained (including the parent, subsidiary, or sibling organization of a principal by which he or she is retained); to the special private gain or loss of a relative; or to the special private gain or loss of a business associate. Commissioners of community redevelopment agencies (CRAB) under Sec. 163.356 or 163.357, F.S., and officers of independent special tax districts elected on a one -acre, one -vote basis are not prohibited from voting in that capacity. For purposes of this law, a "relative" includes only the officer's father, mother, son, daughter, husband, wife, brother, sister, father -in -law, mother -in -law, son -in -law, and daughter -in -law. A "business associate" means any person or entity engaged in or carrying on a business enterprise with the officer as a partner, joint venturer, coowner of property, or corporate shareholder (where the shares of the corporation are not listed on any national or regional stock exchange). * * * * * * * * * * * ELECTED OFFICERS: In addition to abstaining from voting in the situations described above, you must disclose the conflict: PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of your interest in the measure on which you are abstaining from voting; and WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by completing and filing this form with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who should incorporate the form in the minutes. * * * * * * * * * * * « APPOINTED OFFICERS: Although you must abstain from voting in the situations described above, you are not prohibited by Section 112.3143 from otherwise participating in these matters. However, you must disclose the nature of the conflict before making any attempt to influence the decision, whether orally or in writing and whether made by you or at your direction. IF YOU INTEND TO MAKE ANY ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION PRIOR TO THE MEETING AT WHICH THE VOTE WILL BE TAKEN: • You must complete and file this form (before making any attempt to influence the decision) with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who will incorporate the form in the minutes. (Continued on page 2) CE FORM 8B - EFF. 11/2013 Adopted by reference in Rule 34- 7.010(1)(f), F.A.C. PAGE 1 APPOINTED OFFICERS (continued) • A copy of the form must be provided immediately to the other members of the agency. • The form must be read publicly at the next meeting after the form is filed. IF YOU MAKE NO ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION EXCEPT BY DISCUSSION AT THE MEETING: • You must disclose orally the nature of your conflict in the measure before participating. • You must complete the form and file it within 15 days after the vote occurs with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who must incorporate the form in the minutes. A copy of the form must be provided immediately to the other members of the agency, and the form must be read publicly at the next meeting after the form is filed. //'��`j2 `�'�,��'� ., (� DISCLOSURE OF LOCAL OFFICER'S INTEREST 1, � AMA [ � /(Ift, , hereby disclose that on Ae Q-1 L 17 I ( measure came or will come before my agency which (check one or more) inured to my special private gain or Toss; inured to the special gain or loss of my business associate, inured to the special gain or Toss of my relative, ,20it: inured to the special gain or loss of by whom I am retained; or inured to the special gain or loss of which is the parent subsidiary, or sibling organization or subsidiary of a principal which has retained me. (b) The measure before my agency and the nature of my conflicting interest in the measure is as follows: wits ?Sit_ lANDQvQ# We-It t-r iz 17-0- Gl LD2-0 1' (31D4 If disclosure of specific information would violate confidentiality or privilege pursuant to law or rules goveming attorneys, a public officer, who is also an attorney, may comply with the disclosure requirements of this section by disclosing the nature of the interest in such a way as to provide the public with notice of the conflict. 7 / Date Fil Si gnat r g e NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES §112.317, A FAILURE TO MA NY REQl7IRED DISCLOSURE CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF T FOLLOWING: IMPEACHMENT, REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION, REDUCTION IN SALARY, REPRIMAND, OR A CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED $10,000. CE FORM 8B - EFF. 11/2013 Adopted by reference in Rule 34- 7.010(1)(f), F.A.C. PAGE 2 FORM 8B MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT FOR COUNTY, MUNICIPAL, AND OTHER LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS LAST N —FIRST NAME —MID NAME �J DAT knir- )rl a-» AnLeiiyi/ NAME OF BOARD, COUNCIL COMMISSION` AUTHORITY, OR MMITTEE COMM will/ ��l/� /oP D�tr� MAILING ADDRESS SCs s Nercu le_s ,4V THE BOARD, COUNCIL /COMMISSION, AUTHORITY OR COMMITTEE ON WHICH I SERVE ISA UNIT OF: TY ❑ COUNTY ❑ OTHER LOCAL AGENCY CITY COUNTY C/ A ,_ vich � ` fu A J/A S „G / NAME OF POLITICAL SUBDIVISION: DATE ON WHICH VOTE OC UR5E / // MY POSITION IS: ❑ ELECTIVE 0.PPOINTIVE WHO MUST FILE FORM 8B This form is for use by any person serving at the county, city, or other local level of govemment on an appointed or elected board, council, commission, authority, or committee. It applies to members of advisory and non - advisory bodies who are presented with a voting conflict of interest under Section 112.3143, Florida Statutes. Your responsibilities under the law when faced with voting on a measure in which you have a conflict of interest will vary greatly depending on whether you hold an elective or appointive position. For this reason, please pay close attention to the instructions on this form before completing and filing the form. INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 112.3143, FLORIDA STATUTES A person holding elective or appointive county, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which would inure to his or her special private gain or Toss. Each elected or appointed local officer also MUST ABSTAIN from knowingly voting on a measure which would inure to the special gain or loss of a principal (other than a govemment agency) by whom he or she is retained (including the parent, subsidiary, or sibling organization of a principal by which he or she is retained); to the special private gain or loss of a relative; or to the special private gain or Toss of a business associate. Commissioners of community redevelopment agencies (CRAs) under Sec. 163.356 or 163.357, F.S., and officers of independent special tax districts elected on a one -acre, one -vote basis are not prohibited from voting in that capacity. For purposes of this law, a "relative" includes only the officer's father, mother, son, daughter, husband, wife, brother, sister, father -in -law, mother -in -law, son -in -law, and daughter -in -law. A "business associate" means any person or entity engaged in or carrying on a business enterprise with the officer as a partner, joint venturer, coowner of property, or corporate shareholder (where the shares of the corporation are not listed on any national or regional stock exchange). • • Y k k f R k t R R ELECTED OFFICERS: In addition to abstaining from voting in the situations described above, you must disclose the conflict PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of your interest in the measure on which you are abstaining from voting; and WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by completing and filing this form with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who should incorporate the form in the minutes. 4 M t APPOINTED OFFICERS: Although you must abstain from voting in the situations described above, you are not prohibited by Section 112.3143 from otherwise participating in these matters. However, you must disclose the nature of the conflict before making any attempt to influence the decision, whether orally or in writing and whether made by you or at your direction. IF YOU INTEND TO MAKE ANY ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION PRIOR TO THE MEETING AT WHICH THE VOTE WILL BE TAKEN: • You must complete and file this form (before making any attempt to influence the decision) with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who will incorporate the form in the minutes. (Continued on page 2) CE FORM 8B - EFF. 1112013 Adopted by reference in Rule 34- 7.010(1)(f), F.A.C. PAGE 1 APPOINTED OFFICERS (continued) • A copy of the form must be provided immediately to the other members of the agency. • The form must be read publicly at the next meeting after the form is filed. IF YOU MAKE NO ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION EXCEPT BY DISCUSSION AT THE MEETING: • You must disclose orally the nature of your conflict in the measure before participating. • You must complete the form and file it within 15 days after the vote occurs with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who must incorporate the form in the minutes. A copy of the form must be provided immediately to the other members of the agency, and the form must be read publicly at the next meeting after the form is filed. DISCLOSURE OF LOCAL OFFICER'S INTEREST hereby disclose that on (a) A measure came or will come before my agency which (check one or more) inured to my special private gain or loss; inured to the special gain or Toss of my business associate, inured to the special gain or loss of my relative inured to the special gain or loss of e j A -s'soC /u-ieS whom I am retained or /{i4 f/O e d inured to the special gain or loss of / , which is the parent subsidiary, or sibling organization or subsidiary of a principal which has retained me. (b) The measure before my agency and the nature of my conflicting interest in the measure is as follows: 20 /6 , by F b g —0/00y —‘5/ o/d Coa eAman If disclosure of specific information would violate confidentiality or privilege pursuant to law or rules goveming attorneys, a public officer, who is also an attorney, may comply with the disclosure requirements of this section by disclosing the nature of the interest in such a way as to provide the public with notice of the conflict. Date Filed Signature NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES §112.317, A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRED DISCLOSURE CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: IMPEACHMENT, REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION, REDUCTION IN SALARY, REPRIMAND, OR A CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED $10,000. CE FORM 88 - EFF. 11/2013 Adopted by reference in Rule 34- 7.010(1)(f), F.A.C. PAGE 2 CITY OF CLEARWATER Ci.ii,.id∎v :R PLANNING & Dr•.ra c, ti:rxIr, POST C)n R r. B 7.z 4748, CI 1. Pic OR M:\ 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SFIRCICES BUILDING, 100 Sc'i is M7RTi i, 1, ENu i , C jai A.TER, 1,L >luDA 73756 TH.EPxc>N '. (727) 562 -45617 Interdepartmental Correspondence Sheet TO: Community Development Board Members FROM: Michael Delk, Planning and Development Director COPIES: Pam Akin City Attorney; Susan Chase, Documents and Records Specialist, /Pat Sullivan, Board Reporter SUBJECT: Agenda Items for April 17, 2018 DATE: April 11, 2018 CDB packets being distributed contain the following: Unapproved minutes of previous meetings March 20, 2018 RESQUEST TO CONTINUE TO THE MAY 15, 2018 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING (Items 1 -4) 1. Case: LUP2017 -09004 & REZ2017- 09005— Properties in the Downtown Gateway and Prospect Lake Character Districts (Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan Area Level Three Application Presenter: Kyle Brotherton, Senior Planner 2. Case: LUP2017 -09005 & REZ2017- 09006— Properties within the Old Bay Character District Expansion Area (Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan Area) Level Three Application Presenter: Kyle Brotherton, Senior Planner CONTINUED FROM THE MARCH 20, 2018 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING (ITEMS 1 -2) 1. Case: LUP2018 -02001 — 3474 Aspen Trail, 3490 and 3492 Lake Shore Lane Presenter: Lauren Matzke, AIQP, Long Range Planning Manager Yes: No: 2. Case: REZ20 7 -12023 — 3474 Aspen Trail, 3490 and 3492 Lake Shore Lane Presenter: Lauren Matzke, AIC , Long Range Planning Manager Yes: No: LEVEL TWO APPLICATIONS (Items 1 1. Case: Case: FLD2018- 01004— 651 Old Coachman Road Presenter: Mark T. Parry, AICP, Senior Planner Yes: • No: I have conducted a Signature: ation on the ersonal site visit to the oll • win ! � rs Date: Ol • r' erties. PRINT NAME S: (Planning Department\C D BlAgendas DRC & CDBICDBI2018104 April 17, 201811 Cover MEMO 2018.docx CITY OF CLEARWATER CLEARW A SLR PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT, POST OITIC : BOY 4748, CLEARvv ATLR. Ft ('R.Dr. 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 Sot:T:11Myi ri i. -iVEM1I t, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 Ti:7.ePla,,.. (72') 562 -4567 Interdepartmental Correspondence Sheet TO: Community Development Board Members FROM: Michael Delk, Planning and Development Director COPIES: Pam Akin City Attorney; Susan Chase, Documents and Records Specialist, /Pat Sullivan, Board Reporter SUBJECT: Agenda Items for April 17, 2018 DATE: April 11, 2018 CDB packets being distributed contain the following: - Unapproved minutes of previous meetings March 20, 2018 RESQUEST TO CONTINUE TO THE MAY 15, 2018 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING (Items 1 -4) 1. Case: LUP2017 -09004 & REZ2017- 09005— Properties in the Downtown Gateway and Prospect Lake Character Districts (Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan Area Level Three Application Presenter: Kyle Brotherton, Senior Planner 2. Case: LUP2017 -09005 & REZ2017- 09006— Properties within the Old Bay Character District Expansion Area (Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan Area) Level Three Application Presenter: Kyle Brotherton, Senior Planner CONTINUED FROM THE MARCH 20, 2018 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING (ITEMS 1 -2) 1. Case: LUP2018 -02001 — 3474 Aspen Trail, 3490 and 3492 Lake Shore Lane Presenter: Lauren Matzke, AICP, Long Range Planning Manager Yes: No: 2. Case: R'1 Z2017 -12023 — 3474 Aspen Trail, 3490 and 3492 Lake Shore Lane Presenter: Lauren Matzke, ICtP, Long Range Planning Manager Yes: No: LEVEL TWO APPLICATIONS (Items 1 1. Case: Case: FLD2018- 01004— 651 Old Coachman Road Presenter: ark T. Parry, AICP, Senior Planner Yes: N p_ I have co Signatur P du;�::,,,,,;�,,,, • ; �', on the personal site visit to the of owin roe ies. Date: . r NAME S:\Planning DepartmentlC D BlAgendas DRC & CDBICDB12018104 April 17, 201811 Cover MEMO 2018.docx CITY OF CLEAR`ATER xvI;•\,G & DiI.eLao vn..NT, P(sr Ori'R:u BON 4748, CIT'ARV 1TF ::RR, FLORIDA 33758-4748 NItim {.I3 a Sfa.ui S BUILDING, 100 SOLTIIMYIULE AVENUE, ( A ,.\12VIATER, FLORIDA 33756 '1 I i.fPHO',i (727) 562.4567 Interdepartmental Correspondence Sheet TO: Community Development Board Members FROM: Michael Delk, Planning and Development Director COPIES: Pam Akin City Attorney; Susan Chase, Documents and Records Specialist, /Pat Sullivan, Board Reporter SUBJECT: Agenda Items for April 17, 2018 DATE: April 11, 2018 CDB packets being distributed contain the following: Unapproved minutes of previous meetings March 20, 2018 RESQUEST TO CONTINUE TO THE MAY 15, 2018 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING (Items 1 -4) 1. Case: LUP2017 -09004 & REZ2017- 09005— Properties in the Downtown Gateway and Prospect Lake Character Districts (Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan Area Level Three Application Presenter: Kyle Brotherton, Senior Planner 2. Case: LUP2017 -09005 & REZ2017- 09006— Properties within the Old Bay Character District Expansion Area (Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan Area) Level Three Application Presenter: Kyle Brotherton, Senior Planner CONTINUED FROM THE MARCH 20, 2018 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING (ITEMS 1 -2) 1. Case: LUP2018 -02001 — 3474 Aspen Trail, 3490 and 3492 Lake Shore Lane Presenter: Lauren Matzke, AICP, Long Range Planning Manager Yes: No: 2. Case: REZ2017 -12023 — 3474 Aspen Trail, 3490 and 3492 Lake Shore Lane Presenter: Lauren Matzke, AICP, Long Range Pl3tnning Manager Yes: No: LEVEL TWO APPLICATIONS (Items 1 1. Case: Case: FLD2018- 01004— 651 Old Coachman Road Presenter: Mark T. Parry, AICP, Senior Planner Yes: No: I have conducted^ person e invest• ;. t on the personal site visit to the fol ;owjng properties. Signature: Date: PRINT NAME S:\Planning DepartmentlC D BlAgendas DRC & CDBICDBI2018104 April 17, 2018\1 Cover MEMO 2018.docx