Loading...
04/18/2017 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING MINUTES CITY OF CLEARWATER April 18, 2017 Present: Chair John Funk, Board Member David E. Allbritton, Board Member Christopher J. Anuszkiewicz, Board Member Mary A. Lau, Board Member Mike Flanery, Board Member John Quattrocki, Acting Board Member Reed Haydon Absent: Vice Chair Michael Boutzoukas Also Present: Randy Mora - Attorney for the Board, Camilo Soto - Assistant City Attorney, Michael L. Delk - Planning & Development Director, Robert Tefft— Planning Manager, Nicole Sprague — ORLS Coordinator DRAFT A. CALL TO ORDER, INVOCATION, PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Chair called the meeting to order at 1:00 p.m. at City Hall, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. To provide continuity for research, items are in agenda order although not necessarily discussed in that order. B. ROLL CALL: C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING: March 21, 2017 Member Allbritton moved to approve the minutes of the March 21, 2017 Community Development Board meeting as submitted in written summation. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. D. CITIZENS TO BE HEARD RE ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA: None E. CONSENT AGENDA: The following cases are not contested by the applicant, staff, neighboring property owners, etc. and will be approved by a single vote at the beginning of the meeting: (Items 1-3) 1. PULLED FROM CONSENT AGENDA Case: FLD2016-11037 — 410 Maple Street Level Two Application Owner: Clearwater Gas System - Chuck Warrington, Managing Director Agent: Tara L. Kivett, Engineering Construction Manager; City of Clearwater (100 South Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756; phone: 727- 562-4758; email. Cara.kivett @myclearwater.com) Community Development 4/18/2017 1 Location: 7.43 acres located at the southwest corner of Maple Street and North Myrtle Avenue. Request: The Community Development Board (CDB) is reviewing the proposed redevelopment of an existing Governmental Use (Clearwater Gas Complex) in the Downtown (D) District and the Old Bay character of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan for the property located at 410 Maple Street. The project site is limited to that portion of the property west of the CSX rail line and involves the demolition of all existing buildings and the construction of seven new buildings between 20 and 50 feet in height, includes a minimum of 137 parking spaces, requests allowable flexibility with regard to parking, fencing and landscaping (Sections 2-903.D, 3-807-.E and 3-1202.G); and an increase in the otherwise permitted height from 40 feet to 50 feet via the provision of a major public amenity (Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan); and a two-year Development Order under the provisions of CDC Section 4-407. Neighborhood Association: Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition, Presenter: Mark T. Parry, AIC Member Anuszkiewicz declared a conflict of interest. Member Allbritton moved to accept Mark Parry as an expert witness in the fields of redevelopment planning, comprehensive planning, annexation implementation, zoning, land use/rezoning applications, land development, general planning code amendments, landscape ordinance, and special area plans/overlay districts. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Senior Planner Mark Parry reviewed the Staff Report. In response to a concern, Mr. Parry said the City had done studies on the property's environmental issues and would take care of any problems that may arise. In response to questions, he reviewed downtown architectural design guidelines. Project buildings will have robust landscaping on all sides and a mural on the rear of one building that faced Pinellas Trail. A bicycle rest and repair station was proposed for the trail adjacent to the site. Code permitted the 8-foot decorative fence surrounding the entire site for protection of the outdoor storage of propane tanks. Gas System Managing Director Chuck Warrington said the project will be a vast improvement to the site. Member Albritton moved to approve Case FLD2016-11037 based on the evidence and testimony presented in the application, the Staff Report and at today's hearing, and hereby adopt the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law stated in the Staff Report with conditions of approval as listed. The motion was duly seconded. Members Allbritton, Lau, Flanery, Quattrocki, Chair Funk, and Acting Member Haydon voted "Aye." Member Anuszkiewicz abstained. Motion carried. Community Development 4/18/2017 2 2. Level Three Application Case: TA2017-03004 - Amendments to the Community Development Code Applicant: City of Clearwater Applicant: City of Clearwater Request: Review and recommendation to the City Council of an amendment to the Community Development Code. Neighborhood Association: Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Presenter: Robert G. Tefft, Development Review Manager 3. Level Three Application Case: LUP2017-01001 — 3111, 3109 Wolfe Road, 421, 501 N. McMullen-Booth Rd. Owner: City of Clearwater Applicant: Parks & Recreation Department (100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33765) Location: 0.83 acre directly at the southeast corner of Wolfe Road and N McMullen Booth Road. Request: The Community Development Board (CDB) is reviewing a request to amend the Future Land Use Map designation of four parcels totaling 0.83 acre from Residential Urban (RU) (County) to Recreation/Open Space (R/OS) (City) upon annexation (ANX2017-01002) and making a recommendation to City Council. Neighborhood Association: Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Presenter: Ellen Crandall, Senior Planner 4. Level Three Application Case: REZ2017-01001 — 3111, 3109 Wolfe Road, 421, 501 N. McMullen-Booth Rd. Owner: City of Clearwater Applicant: Parks & Recreation Department (100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33765) Location: 0.83 acre directly at the southeast corner of Wolfe Road and N McMullen Booth Road Request: The Community Development Board (CDB) is reviewing a request to amend the Zoning Atlas from R-3 (County) to Open Space/Recreation (OS/R) (City) upon annexation (ANX2017-01002) and making a recommendation to City Council. Neighborhood Association: Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Presenter: Ellen Crandall, Senior Planner Member Quattrocki moved to recommend approval of Cases TA2017-03004, LUP2017- 01001, and REZ2017-01001 on today's Consent Agenda based on evidence in the record, including the application(s) and the Staff Report(s), and hereby adopt the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law stated in the Staff Report(s). The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. F. LEVEL TWO APPLICATIONS: (Item 1) Community Development 4/18/2017 3 1. Case: FLD2017-01001 — 252 Dolphin Point Level Two Application Owner: Allen Cole and Sheila Cole Agent: Michael J. Palmer, Synergy Civil Engineering, Inc. (3000 Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard, Suite 201, Clearwater, FL 34685; phone: 727-796-1926; email. meal mer @synergycivi leng.com) Location: 0.18 acres located on the north side of Dolphin Point approximately 162 feet west of Larboard Way Request: The Community Development Board (CDB) is reviewing a proposed four- unit attached dwelling use in the Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District for the property located at 252 Dolphin Point. The project is 43 feet in height (from Base Flood Elevation to roof slab) and 47 feet in height (from Base Flood Elevation to highest architectural feature), and requests to allow flexibility from lot width, lot area, building height, landscape and setback requirements; and requests a two-year development order (Section 2-404.F, Section 3-1202.G, and Section 4-407). Neighborhood Associations: Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition, Island Estates Civic Association Presenter: Kevin W. Nurnberger, Senior Planner Attorney Anna Wiand requested Party Status on behalf of nearby homeowners Missy Waters, Emmanuel Goufas, Cynthia Aguilar, Dick and Patty Fritz, Denise Herbert, Andreas Fourtounis, Chuck and Nancy Kratz, and Phillippe and Audrey Cornu. Acting Member Haydon moved to grant Party Status to Attorney Anna Wiand on behalf of Missy Waters, Emmanuel Goufas, Cynthia Aguilar, Dick and Patty Fritz, Denise Herbert, Andreas Fourtounis, Chuck and Nancy Kratz, and Phillippe and Audrey Cornu. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Acting Member Haydon moved to accept Kevin Nurnberger as an expert witness in the fields of zoning, site plan analysis, planning in general, and the landscape ordinance. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Senior Planner Kevin Nurnberger reviewed the Staff Report. Attorney Brian Aungst, representing the applicants, requested approval of expert witnesses. Member Lau moved to accept Michael J. Palmer as an expert in the fields of civil engineering, land use, and planning. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Acting Member Haydon moved to accept Krassen Gueorguiev as an expert in the field of architecture. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Community Development 4/18/2017 4 Acting Member Haydon moved to accept Wilmer Eichler as an expert in the fields of property appraisal and residential property market value. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Member Anuszkiewicz moved to accept James Montgomery as an expert in the field of landscape architecture. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Attorney Aungst said the proposed redevelopment was consistent with Code, the Island Estates neighborhood plan, and Island Estates overlay district. He said the Code encouraged this type of redevelopment, which would renovate an eyesore with a modern, multi-family residential structure that will increase nearby property values. He said the residential infill will feature a minimal footprint and proposed side setbacks differed little from current ones. In response to questions from Attorney Aungst, Michael J. Palmer said the request adhered to the City's Comprehensive Plan and there was no legal basis for denial. He said setbacks were within minimum requirements and the height complied with Code. Wilmer Eichler said he inspected the neighborhood and opined the development would not hinder nearby development or reduce the value of adjacent properties. He said these types of developments historically enhanced nearby property values. He said abutting properties had limited water views. Attorney Aungst said all mechanicals will be enclosed on the roof and all trash will be enclosed and brought out on trash day. He said many nearby buildings exceeded the project's height with some taller than 100 feet. He said the proposal was consistent with neighboring properties and was less dense than permitted. Attorney Wiand requested that her time be extended. Acting Board Member Haydon moved to extend Attorney Wiand's time. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Attorney Wiand said homeowners had retained her yesterday. She was unsure if all neighbors were properly notified. She said before plans were developed. Ms. Cole met with Audrey Cornu, president of the abutting property's homeowner association, but did not provide project details. She said neighbors acknowledged the property had an older building that was an eye sore. She said a 40-page letter was prepared outlining opposition to the project i.e. the scale of the 16,000 square-foot condominium building and its base was too large for the lot, it did not comply with Code as it was not in harmony with the neighborhood, it was too close to properties to the east and west, adversely affecting them by replacing partial water views with a wall, it would decrease nearby property values, have a detrimental effect on the neighborhood, and nearby high rise buildings had more green space. She requested that the Board deny the request. In Community Development 4/18/2017 5 response to a question from Assistant City Attorney Camilo Soto, she said she had no evidence that the project would reduce the fair market value of neighboring properties. In response to Attorney Aungst's comments, Mr. Nurnberger agreed Ms. Cornu communicated with staff re the property on April 7, 2017, the Code and Island Estates Plan encouraged infill projects in this area and the project complied with the Code re lot area, width, and setbacks necessary to accommodate redevelopment of the parcel, the Code dictated development of infill medium high density residential properties on Island Estates, the project was less dense and had a lower ISR (Impervious Surface Ratio) than permitted by Code, and there were no lot area and lot width requirements for a residential infill project. Attorney Wiand expressed concern staff had posted the Consent Agenda online yesterday. She said one resident's notice of the meeting had 3 different postmarks. Attorney Soto said the City's infill program contemplated the type of project reflected in the proposal, which met the intent of Code. Attorney Aungst's submittal included the City's affidavit of mailing notices dated April 7, 2017 and an affidavit signed by the developer acknowledging the property was properly posted. One resident spoke in opposition. Attorney Aungst said the property owners respected their neighbors; Ms. Cole approached Ms. Cornu on April 7, 2017. He said the property was posted 10 days before required and a resident emailed the City about the project on April 10, 2017. He said the project met and exceeded all Code requirements and met the City's vision. He said the property owners complied with the law. He said Mr. Nurnberger testified the subject building setbacks were setbacks necessary to allow for this development. He said the modern and beautiful redevelopment featured sprinklers, an extra hydrant and would increase nearby property values. Discussion ensued. It was stated evidence indicated the meeting was properly noticed and the board could not speculate on the project's impacts on future fair market values; the market would dictate if the project was viable. It was noted if seriously damaged by storms, neighborhood structures would have to be rebuilt at required BFE heights. It was stated the Board must base its decision on the Code and the project met Island Estates' stringent rules, Code, and was of proper scale. Concerns were expressed: 1) the application requested a lot of flexibility; 2) the proposed setback was not appropriate; the Staff Report did not list requirements for building setbacks between 5-story and 2-story buildings on adjoining properties; 3) the design was commercial, unattractive, too large, and may negatively affect the immediate vicinity; and 4) the project did not fit in the community. Community Development 4/18/2017 6 Attorney for the Board Randy Mora said a previous variance for the property was not relevant to the Board's analysis. He said the Board should base their decision on criteria presented. Planning & Development Director Michael Delk said staff did not prescribe to an architectural style. Mr. Nurnberger said staff found the proposed development was consistent with Code, including the number of required parking spaces, and recommended approval. Member Allbritton moved to approve Case FLD2017 -01001 based on the evidence and testimony presented in the application, the Staff Report and at today's hearing, and hereby adopt the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law stated in the Staff Report with conditions of approval as listed. The motion was duly seconded. Members Allbritton, Lau, and Quattrocki voted "Aye "; Members Anuszkiewicz, Flanery, Chair Funk, and Acting Member Haydon voted "Nay." Motion failed. Member Anuszkiewicz moved to deny Case FLD2017 -01001 based on the evidence and testimony presented in the application, the Staff Report and at today's hearing. The motion was duly seconded. Members Anuszkiewicz, Flanery, Chair Funk, and Acting Member Haydon voted "Aye "; Members Allbritton, Lau, and Quattrocki voted "Nay." Motion carried. G. ADJOURN Attest The meeting adjourned at 2:50 p.m. /1 oard Reporter Chair' Community Development Board Community Development 4/18/2017 7 FORM 813 MEMOKANUUM U1- VO 1 INU UUNI-LIC:-I- FUiR COUNTY, MUNICIPAL, AND OTHER LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS ST NAME —FIRST NAME — MIDDLE NAME NAME OF HOARD, COUNCIL, COMMISSION, AUTHORITY, OR COMMITTEE -PAN (JSZ vezu 1 C_z_ Ck-AttA 5 C., D 41LlNG ADDRESS THE BOARD, COUNCIL, COMMISSION, AUTHORITY OR COMMITTEE ON � �� 40 A Wy11CH 1 SERVE IS A UNIT OF- 0 l,11r °COUNTY CI OTHER LOCAL AGENCY TY OUNTY I %TE ON WHICH VOTE OCCURRED 4 /IP / )1 NAME OF POLITICAL SUBDIVISION: MY POST IS: 0 ELECTIVE V APPOINTIVE WHO MUST FILE FORM 8B 'his form is for use by any person serving at the county, city, or other local levet of government on an appointed or elected board, counci ommission, authority, or committee. It applies equally to members of advisory and non - advisory bodies who are presented with a votin+ onflict of interest under Section 112.3143, Florida Statutes. our responsibilities under the law when faced with voting on a measure In which you have a conflict of interest will vary greatly depending n whether you hold an elective or appointive position. For this reason, please pay close attention to the instructions on this form beforr ompleting the reverse side and filing the form. INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 112.3143, FLORIDA STATUTES person holding elective or appointive county. municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which ures to his or her special private gain or loss. Each elected or appointed local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting on a mea- ire which inures to the special gain or Toss of a principal (other than a government agency) by whom he or she is retained (including the Trent organization or subsidiary of a corporate principal by which he or she is retained); to the special private gain or loss of a relative; or the special private gain or loss of a business associate. Commissioners of community redevelopment agencies under Sec. 163.356 or i3 357, F.S., and officers of independent special tax districts elected on a one -acre. one -vote basis are not prohibited from voting in that .pacify. Ir purposes of this law, a "relative" includes only the officer's father, mother, son, daughter, husband, wife, brother, sister, father -in -law, ,they -in -law, son-in -taw, and daughter -in -law. A `business associate" means any person or entity engaged in or carrying on a business iterprise with the officer as a partner, joint venturer, coowner of property, or corporate shareholder (where the shares of the corporation a not listed on any national or regional stock exchange). LECTED OFFICERS: addition to abstaining from voting in the situations described above, you must disclose the conflict: PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly-stating to the assembly the nature of your interest in the measure on which you are abstaining from voting; and WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by completing and filing this form with the person responsible for recording the min- utes of the meeting, who should incorporate the form in the minutes. • • • • • PPOINTED OFFICERS: hough you must abstain from voting in the situations described above, you otherwise may participate in these matters. However, you ist disclose the nature of the conflict before making any attempt to influence the decision, whether orally or in writing and whether made you or at your direction. - YOU INTEND TO MAKE ANY ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION PRIOR TO THE MEETING AT WHICH THE VOTE WILL BE KEN: You must complete and file this form (before making any attempt to influence the decision) with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who will incorporate the form in the minutes. (Continued on other side) F=ORi.18E; EFF 1/2000 OINTED OFFICERS (continued) opy of the form must be provided immediately to the other members of the agency. form must be read publicly at the next meeting after the form is filed. U MAKE NO ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION EXCEPT BY DISCUSSION AT THE MEETING: i must disclose orally the nature of your conflict in the measure before participating. i must complete the form and file it within 15 days after the vote occurs with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the acing, who must incorporate the form in the minutes. A copy of the form must be provided immediately to the other members of the ncy, and the form must be read publicly at the next meeting after the form is filed. DISCLOSURE OF LOCAL OFFICER'S INTEREST C- j �fJt��C.14� eJ1L2 , hereby disclose that on z(//45 ,20 f ( Ieasure came or will come before my agency which (check one) inured to my special private gain or Toss; inured to the special gain or loss of my business associate, inured to the special gain or loss of my relative, nured to the special gain or Toss of by whom 1 am retained; or nured to the special gain or loss of , which s the parent organization or subsidiary of a principal which has retained me. measure before my agency and the nature of my conflicting interest in the measure is as follows: !led Oct4)4- 11_19 (0 11°37 WA5 —Ftic M,JDsc'S4& -H r oP. P-4 M j C-,0,00003 ie 4s 6C4 -D -r ati bituns $4PP. sit4N. E: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES §112.3173.A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRED DISCLOSURE 1TUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: IMPEACHMENT, /.AL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OP. EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION. REDUCTION IN :SAI. ARY REPRIN ANO. 00 A.. 'iOT TO EXCccr CITY OF CLEARWATER CLEARWATER PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT, POST OFFICE. Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758 -4748 MUNICIPAL.: SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 Interdepartmental Correspondence Sheet TO: Community Development Board Members FROM: Robert Tefft, Development Review Manager COPIES: Camilo Soto, Assistant City Attorney; Susan Chase, Documents and Records Specialist, /Pat Sullivan, Board Reporter SUBJECT: Agenda Items for DATE: April 18, 2017 CDB packets being distributed contain the following. Unapproved minutes of previous meeting March 21, 2017 Site investigation form LEVEL TWO APPLICATIONS (ITEMS 1- 2) 1. Case: Case: FLD2017-01001 — 252 Dolphin Point Presenter: Key' W. Nurnberger, Senior Planner Yes: No: 2. Case: FLD2016 -11037 — 410 Maple Street Presenter: Parry, AICP, Senior Planner Yes: No: LEVEL THREE APPLICATIONS (ITEMS 1 -3) 1. Case: TA2017 -03004 — Amendments to the Clearwater Community Development Code Presenter: Robert Tefft, Development Review Manager 2. Case: LUP2017 -01001 -& REZ2017 -01001 3111, 3109 Wolfe Road, 421, 501 N McMullen Booth Road Presenter: Ell / Crandall, Senior Planner Yes: f No: I have conducted a perso ' I investigation on the personal site visit to the following roperties. C-- l Date: S: (Planning Department\C D B\Agendas DRC & CDBICDB12017104 April 201711 Cover MEMO 2017.docx CITY OF CLEARWATER CLEARWATER PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT, POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758 -4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 Interdepartmental Correspondence Sheet TO: Community Development Board Members FROM: Robert Tefft, Development Review Manager COPIES: Camilo Soto, Assistant City Attorney; Susan Chase, Documents and Records Specialist, /Pat Sullivan, Board Reporter SUBJECT: Agenda Items for DATE: April 18, 2017 CDB packets being distributed contain the following. Unapproved minutes of previous meeting March 21, 2017 Site investigation form LEVEL TWO APPLICATIONS (ITEMS 1- 2) 1. Case: Case: FLD2017-01001 — 252 Dolphin Point Presenter: Kin W. Nurnberger, Senior Planner Yes: No: 2. Case: FLD20 -11037 — 410 Maple Street Presenter: ark T. Parry, AICP, Senior Planner Yes: No: LEVEL THREE APPLICATIONS (ITEMS 1 -3) 1. Case: TA2017 -03004 — Amendments to the Clearwater Community Development Code Presenter: Robert Tefft, Development Review Manager 2. Case: LUP2017 -01001 -& REZ2017 -01001 3111, 3109 Wolfe Road, 421, 501 N McMullen Booth Road Presenter: Ella Crandall, Senior Planner Yes: No: I have conducte % p • on vestigation on the personal site visit to the following properties. Signature: t La,v PRINT NAME Date: //%71?,c7/7 S: \Planning Department1C D B\Agendas DRC & CDBICDB12017104 April 201711 Cover MEMO 2017.docx CITY OF CLEARWATER CLEiARWATI:R PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT, POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWITER, FLORIDA 33758 -4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDvG, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562 -4567 Interdepartmental Correspondence Sheet TO: Community Development Board Members FROM: Robert Tefft, Development Review Manager COPIES: Camilo Soto, Assistant City Attorney; Susan Chase, Documents and Records Specialist, /Pat Sullivan, Board Reporter SUBJECT: Agenda Items for DATE: April 18, 2017 CDB packets being distributed contain the following. Unapproved minutes of previous meeting March 21, 2017 Site investigation form LEVEL TWO APPLICATIONS (ITEMS 1- 2) 1. Case: Case: FLD2017-01001 — 252 Dolphin Point Presenter: Kevin W. Nurnberger, Senior Planner Yes: J No: 2. Case: FLD2016 -11037 — 410 Maple Street Presenter /Mark T. Parry, AICP, Senior Planner Yes: 1 No: LEVEL THREE APPLICATIONS (ITEMS 1 -3) 1. Case: TA2017 -03004 — Amendments to the Clearwater Community Development Code Presenter: Robert Tefft, Development Review Manager 2. Case: LUP2017 -01001 -& REZ2017 -01001 3111, 3109 Wolfe Road, 421, 501 N McMullen Booth Road Presenter• Ella Crandall, Senior Planner Yes: No: I have conducted a personal investigation on the personal site visit to the following properties. Signature: _ P--e) p)` ;7 PRINT NAME Date: �8/ZOl7 S: (Planning Department\C D BlAgendas DRC & CDBICDB12017104 April 201711 Cover MEMO 2017.docx CITY OF CLEARWATER CLEARWATER PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT, POST OFFICE Box 47.48, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758 -4748 MUNICIPAL. SERVICES BUILDING, 100 Soum MYRTLE AVENUE, CLLARW.ATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 Interdepartmental Correspondence Sheet TO: Community Development Board Members FROM: Robert Tefft, Development Review Manager COPIES: Camilo Soto, Assistant City Attorney; Susan Chase, Documents and Records Specialist, /Pat Sullivan, Board Reporter SUBJECT: Agenda Items for DATE: April 18, 2017 CDB packets being distributed contain the following: Unapproved minutes of previous meeting March 21, 2017 Site investigation form LEVEL TWO APPLICATIONS (ITEMS 1- 2) 1. Case: Case: FLD2017-01001 — 252 Dolphin Point Presenter: Kevin W. Nurnberger, Senior Planner Yes: No: 2. Case: FLD2016 -11037 — 410 Maple Street Presenter: Mark T. Parry, MCP, Senior Planner Yes: No: LEVEL THREE APPLICATIONS (ITEMS 1 -3) 1. Case: TA2017 -03004 — Amendments to the Clearwater Community Development Code Presenter: Robert Tefft, Development Review Manager 2. Case: LUP2017 -01001 -& REZ2017 -01001 3111, 3109 Wolfe Road, 421, 501 N McMullen Booth Road Presenter: Ella Crandall, Senior Planner Yes: ICJ No: I have co Signar!� W 4Z.) /'a,'7 PRI NAME investigation on the personal site visit to the follpwing properties. Date: i 77' / S: (Planning Department\C D BlAgendas DRC & CDBICDBI2017104 April 201711 Cover MEMO 2017.docx