The URL can be used to link to this page

FLS2013-02006'rO-- PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT April 14, 2014 Randy Austin Landon, Moree & Associates 31622 US Highway 19 N Palm Harbor, FL 33767 CITY OF CLEARWATER POST OFFICE BON 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758 -4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562 -4567 FAx (727) 562 -4865 RE: Development Order — FLS2013 -02006 — 650 Bay Esplanade Dear Mr. Austin: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Section 4- 202.E. On June 6, 2013, the Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed your request for Flexible Standard Development application to permit a 102 -room overnight accommodation use in the Tourist (T) District with a lot area of 41,232 square feet (0.95 acres), lot widths of 104 feet along Bay Esplanade (east); 289.98 feet along Bay Esplanade (south) and 182.06 feet along Poinsettia Avenue (west); a front (east) setback of 13.1 feet (to building); front (south) setback of 15 feet (to building); front (west) setbacks of 18 feet (to balconies) and 23 feet (to building); a side (north) setback of eight feet (to balconies) and ten feet (to building); a building height of 75 feet (from Base Flood Elevation to mid -point of decorative roof structure); 131 off - street parking spaces; and a request for a two -year Development Order, pursuant to the Community Development Code Section 2- 802.M, Section 4 -303 and the requirements of the Old Florida District of Beach by Design; and an increase in the maximum density through the allocation of 55 overnight accommodation units from the Hotel Density Reserve created pursuant to Beach by Design, as well as an increase in the percentage of palm trees to 100 percent where 75 percent is allowable, as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program, pursuant to the Community Development Code Section 3- 1202.G. The DRC recommended approval of the application based upon the following: Findings of Fact: 1. 0.95 acre subject property is located on the northeast corner of the Poinsettia Avenue and Bay Esplanade intersection; 2. The subject property is currently five vacant lots that will be tied together under a Unity of Title; 3. That the subject property is located in the Tourist (T) District and the Resort Facilities High (RFH) future land use plan category; 4. That the subject property is located in the Old Florida character district of Beach by Design and is subject to all applicable requirements set forth therein; 5. That the subject property has lot widths of 104 feet along Bay Esplanade (east), 289.98 feet along Bay Esplanade (south), and 182.06 feet along Poinsettia Avenue (west); 6. That the subject property is 41,232 square feet in lot area: s, "EQUAL EMPLOYMEN1 AND ArrIRMATWF. Acnn;. EMPLOYER" April 14, 2014 FLS2013 -02006 7. The proposal is to construct a mid - priced 102 -unit overnight accommodation use at a density of 107.7 units /acre, which includes the allocation of 55 units from the Hotel Density Reserve under Beach by Design; 8. A companion Development Agreement (DVA2013- 02001) must be approved by City Council that provides for the allocation of the 55 units from the Hotel Density Reserve; 9. The hotel will be 75 feet in height from the Base Flood Elevation (BFE) to the mid -point of decorative roof structure as allowed in the Old Florida character district in Beach by Design; 10. That the building will have a front (east) setback of 13.1 feet (to building) as allowed in the Old Florida character district in Beach by Design; 11. That the building will have a front (south) setback of 15 feet (to building) as set forth in the Old Florida character district in Beach by Design; 12. That the building will have a front (west) setback of 23 feet (to building) as allowed in the Old Florida character district in Beach by Design; 13. That the building will have a side (north) setback of 10 feet (to building) as set forth in the Old Florida character district in Beach by Design; 14. That the request includes a side (north) setback of eight feet (to balconies); 15. That the request includes a side (west) setback of 18 feet (to balconies); 16. That the building will have a front (east) stepback of 37.5 feet in width where a 20 foot wide stepback is required in the Old Florida character district in Beach by Design; 17. That the building will have a front (south) stepback of 18.6 feet in width where a 16 foot wide stepback is required in the Old Florida character district in Beach by Design; 18. That the hotels floorplates between forty-five feet and one hundred feet will be less than 25,000 square feet as set forth in Beach by Design guidelines; 19. That no more than two of three building dimensions of the hotel in the vertical or horizontal planes are equal in length as set forth in Beach by Design guidelines; 20. That the maximum building envelope above forty-five feet of the hotel will be 28.7 percent, less than the allowable 70 percent as set forth in the Beach by Design guidelines; 21. That the hotel will consist of a parking garage with a total of 131 parking spaces; 22. That the maximum allowable I.S.R. is 0.95. The proposed I.S.R. is 0.69; and 23. There is no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Conclusions of Law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Community Development Code Tables 2 -801.1 and 2 -802; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Community Development Code Section 2- 802.M; 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level One Approvals as per Community Development Code Section 3- 914.A; 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the Old Florida character district of Beach by Design; and 5. That the development proposal is consistent with the Design Guidelines of Beach by Design. I concur with the findings of the Development Review Committee and, through this letter, APPROVE your application for Flexible Standard Development with the following conditions: Conditions of Approval: 1. That approval of this Flexible Standard Development case is subject to the approval of a Development Agreement with the City (Case DVA2013- 02001); 2. That the development proposal shall be granted a two -year Development Order effective from the date the Development Order is issued by the Community Development Coordinator; April 14, 2014 FLS2013 -02006 3. That prior to the issuance of any building permit, parcels 05/29/15/54756/082 /0010; 05/29/15/54756/082 /0020; 05/29/15/54756/082 /0110; 05/29/15/54756/082 /0120, and 05/29/15/54756/082 /0130 shall be tied together under a Unity of Title; 4. That the prior to the issuance of any building permit, a public right -of -way permit shall be obtained for any work in the public right -of -way; 5. That prior to the issuance of any building permit, the location and visibility of electric equipment (electric panels, boxes and meters) be reviewed and, if located exterior to the building where visible from any street frontage, be painted the same color as the portion of the building to which such features are attached; 6. That prior to the issuance of any building permit, the location and visibility of electric equipment (electric panels, boxes and meters) be reviewed and, if located exterior to the building where visible from any street frontage, be painted the same color as the portion of the building to which such features are attached; 7. That prior to the issuance of any building permit, any applicable Public Art and Design Impact Fee be paid; 8. That prior to the issuance of any building permit, all Parks and Recreation fees be paid; 9. That prior to the issuance of any building permit, all comments from the Fire Department shall be addressed; 10. That prior to the issuance of any building permit, the Fire Department may require the provision of a Water Study perfonned by a Fire Protection Engineer in order to ensure that an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of the project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and /or fire pump. If a fire pinup is required, then the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. 11. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the elevations approved by the Development Review Committee; 12. That any change to the approved colors and /or finished materials shall be submitted to and approved by Staff, 13. That anv future attached or freestanding signage must be monument -style meeting Code requirements and be designed to match exterior materials and color of the building. Any proposed signage for the hotel shall be reviewed and approved by Staff through a separate sign permit; 14. That all landscaping plants and trees shall be Florida Grade #1 plant material with an automatic irrigation system; 15. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, all landscaping shall be installed; 16. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a hurricane evacuation plan for the hotel be submitted and approved by the City for all guests; 17. That prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, all utilities, including individual distribution lines serving this development within the right -of -way along Poinsettia Avenue and Bay Esplanade, as applicable, must be installed underground unless undergrounding is not practicable; and 18. That the books and records pertaining to use of each hotel room be open for inspection by authorized representatives of the City, upon reasonable notice, in order to confirm compliance with the Hotel Density Reserve criteria of Beach by Design as allowed by general law. This approval is based upon, and must adhere to, the application and development plans received June 13, 2013. Pursuant to CDC Section 4 -303, an application for a building permit shall be made within two years of the Flexible Standard Development approval (by July 23, 2015). The building permit must be obtained within six months of the initial permit application. This time frame to obtain the initial building permit may be extended for an additional six months for cause by the Community Development Coordinator. April 14, 2014 FLS2013 -02006 Time frames do not change with successive owners. All required certificates of occupancy must be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the building permit. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain building permits or pay impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Kevin W. Nurnberger, Planner III, at 727 -562- 4567 ext. 2502 or via email at Kevin .nurnberger(a�myclearwater.com. Sincerely, Michael elk, AlCP Planning Director '01900 ' oii , l' P `,,. NLOF �....,��`.� CITY OF CLEARWATER 4 POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CI EARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 A MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLEAVENUE CLEARWATER FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562 -4567 FAX (727) 562 -4865 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT July 23, 2013 Randy Austin Landon, Moree & Associates 31622 US Highway 19 N Palm Harbor, FL 33767 RE: Development Order — FLS2013 -02006 — 650 Bay Esplanade Dear Mr. Austin: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Section 4- 202.E. On June 6, 2013, the Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed your request for Flexible Standard Development application to permit a 102 -room overnight accommodation use in the Tourist (T) District with a lot area of 41,232 square feet (0.95 acres), lot widths of 104 feet along Bay Esplanade (east); 289.98 feet along Bay Esplanade (south) and 182.06 feet along Poinsettia Avenue (west); a front (east) setback of 13.1 feet (to building); front (south) setback of 15 feet (to building); front (west) setbacks of 18 feet (to balconies) and 23 feet (to building); a side (north) setback of eight feet (to balconies) and ten feet (to building); a building height of 75 feet (from Base Flood Elevation to mid -point of decorative roof structure); 131 off - street parking spaces; and a request for a two -year Development Order, pursuant to the Community Development Code Section 2- 802.M, Section 4 -303 and the requirements of the Old Florida District of Beach by Design; and an increase in the maximum density through the allocation of 55 overnight accommodation units from the Hotel Density Reserve created pursuant to Beach by Design, as well as an increase in the percentage of palm trees to 100 percent where 75 percent is allowable, as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program, pursuant to the Community Development Code Section 3- 1202.G. The DRC recommended approval of the application based upon the following: Findings of Fact: 1. 0.95 acre subject property is located on the northeast corner of the Poinsettia Avenue and Bay Esplanade intersection; 2. The subject property is currently five vacant lots that will be tied together under a Unity of Title; 3. That the subject property is located in the Tourist (T) District and the Resort Facilities High (RFH) future land use plan category; 4. That the subject property is located in the Old Florida character district of Beach by Design and is subject to all applicable requirements set forth therein; 5. That the subject property has lot widths of 104 feet along Bay Esplanade (east), 289.98 feet along Bay Esplanade (south), and 182.06 feet along Poinsettia Avenue (west); 6. That the subject property is 41,232 square feet in lot area: MA "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND APHRMATm.. ACTION EMPLOYE " July 23, 2013 FLS2013 -02006 i 7. The proposal is to construct a mid- priced 102 -unit overnight accommodation use at a density of 107.7 units /acre, which includes the allocation of 55 units from the Hotel Density Reserve under Beach by Design; 8. A companion Development Agreement (DVA2013- 02001) must be approved by City Council that provides for the allocation of the 55 units from the Hotel Density Reserve; 9. The hotel will be 75 feet in height from the Base Flood Elevation (BFE) to the mid -point of decorative roof structure as allowed in the Old Florida character district in Beach by Design; 10. That the building will have a front (east) setback of 13.1 feet (to building) as allowed in the Old Florida character district in Beach by Design; 11. That the building will have a front (south) setback of 15 feet (to building) as set forth in the Old Florida character district in Beach by Design; 12. That the building will have a front (west) setback of 23 feet (to building) as allowed in the Old Florida character district in Beach by Design; 13. That the building will have a side (north) setback of 10 feet (to building) as set forth in the Old Florida character district in Beach by Design; 14. That the request includes a side (north) setback of eight feet (to balconies); 15. That the request includes a side (west) setback of 18 feet (to balconies); 16. That the building will have a front (east) stepback of 37.5 feet in width where a 20 foot wide stepback is required in the Old Florida character district in Beach by Design; 17. That the building will have a front (south) stepback of 18.6 feet in width where a 16 foot wide stepback is required in the Old Florida character district in Beach by Design; 18. That the hotels floorplates between forty-five feet and one hundred feet will be less than 25,000 square feet as set forth in Beach by Design guidelines; 19. That no more than two of three building dimensions of the hotel in the vertical or horizontal planes are equal in length as set forth in Beach by Design guidelines; 20. That the maximum building envelope above forty-five feet of the hotel will be 28.7 percent, less than the allowable 70 percent as set forth in the Beach by Design guidelines; 21. That the hotel will consist of a parking garage with a total of 131 parking spaces; 22. That the maximum allowable I.S.R. is 0.95. The proposed I.S.R. is 0.69; and 23. There is no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Conclusions of Law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Community Development Code Tables 2 -801.1 and 2 -802; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Community Development Code Section 2- 802.M; 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level One Approvals as per Community Development Code Section 3- 914.A; 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the Old Florida character district of Beach by Design-, and 5. That the development proposal is consistent with the Design Guidelines of Beach by Design. I concur with the findings of the Development Review Committee and, through this letter, APPROVE your application for Flexible Standard Development with the following conditions: Conditions of Approval: 1. That approval of this Flexible Standard Development case is subject to the approval of a Development Agreement with the City (Case DVA2013- 02001); 2. That the development proposal shall be granted a two -year Development Order effective from the date the Development Order is issued by the Community Development Coordinator; July 23, 2013 r FLS2013 -02006 3. That prior to the issuance of any building permit, parcels 05/29/15/54756/082 /0010; 05/29/15/54756/082 /0020; 05/29/15/54756/082 /0110; 05/29/15/54756/082 /0120, and 05/29/15/54756/082 /0130 shall be tied together under a Unity of Title; 4. That the prior to the issuance of any building permit, a public right -of -way permit shall be obtained for any work in the public right -of -way; 5. That prior to the issuance of any building permit, the location and visibility of electric equipment (electric panels, boxes and meters) be reviewed and, if located exterior to the building where visible from any street frontage, be painted the same color as the portion of the building to which such features are attached; 6. That prior to the issuance of any building permit, the location and visibility of electric equipment (electric panels, boxes and meters) be reviewed and, if located exterior to the building where visible from any street frontage, be painted the same color as the portion of the building to which such features are attached; 7. That prior to the issuance of any building permit, any applicable Public Art and Design .Impact Fee be paid; 8. That prior to the issuance of any building permit, all Parks and Recreation fees be paid; 9. That prior to the issuance of any building permit, all comments from the Fire Department shall be addressed; 10. That prior to the issuance of any building permit, the Fire Department may require the provision of a Water Study performed by a Fire Protection Engineer in order to ensure that an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of the project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and /or fire pump. If a fire pump is required, then the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. 11. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the elevations approved by the Development Review Committee; 12. That any change to the approved colors and /or finished materials shall be submitted to and approved by Staff, 13. That any future attached or freestanding signage must be monument -style meeting Code requirements and be designed to match exterior materials and color of the building. Any proposed signage for the hotel shall be reviewed and approved by Staff through a separate sign permit; 14. That all landscaping plants and trees shall be Florida Grade #1 plant material with an automatic irrigation system; 15. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, all landscaping shall be installed; 16. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a hurricane evacuation plan for the hotel be submitted and approved by the City for all guests; 17. That prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, all utilities, including individual distribution lines serving this development within the right -of -way along Poinsettia Avenue and Bay Esplanade, as applicable, must be installed underground unless undergrounding is not practicable; and 18. That the books and records pertaining to use of each hotel room be open for inspection by authorized representatives of the City, upon reasonable notice, in order to confirm compliance with the Hotel Density Reserve criteria of Beach by Design as allowed by general law. This approval is based upon, and must adhere to, the application and development plans received June 13, 2013. Pursuant to CDC Section 4 -303, an application for a building permit shall be made within two years of the Flexible Standard Development approval (by July 23, 2014). The building permit must be obtained within six months of the initial permit application. This time frame to obtain the initial building permit may be extended for an additional six months for cause by the Community Development Coordinator. July 23, 2013 FLS2013 -02006 Time frames do not change with successive owners. All required certificates of occupancy must be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the building permit. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain building permits or pay impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of thisAetter with you when applying for any permits or licenses. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Kevin W. Numberger, Planner III, at 727 -562- 4567 ext. 2502 or via email at kevin.n urn berger a,m_yclearwater.com. Sincerely, Michael Del , ICP Planning Director 4rrrrr� CITY" OF CLEARWATER PLANNmNG & DEVELOPME. T DuARTMEtiT POST Orrlc;e Box 4743, CLEnxwnTex, FLORIDA 337 58 -4748 MwrC[PAL SERA °rcES BUILDING, 100 Souzu MyRTLx.AvENuE, CLEnxwni'Ex, FLORA 33756 TFL -PH E / 27 562 4 >6 / FAx 2 562 -4865. May 17, 2013 RE: NOTICE OF FILING AN APPLICATION FOR FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AT 650 BAY ESPLANADE (FLS2013- 02006); OWNED BY: BAY ESPLANADE PROJECT LLC To Surrounding Property Owners: As a property owner within 500 feet of 650 BAY ESPLANADE, the City of Clearwater Planning and Development Department gives notice that an application has been submitted for Flexible Standard Development application to permit a 102 -room overnight accommodation use in the Tourist (T) District with a lot area of 41,232 square feet (0.95 acres), lot widths of 104 feet along Bay Esplanade (east); 289.98 feet along Bay Esplanade (south) and 182.06 feet along Poinsettia Avenue (west); a front (east) setback of 13.1 feet (to building); front (south) setback of 15 feet (to building); front (west) setbacks of 18 feet (to balconies) and 23 feet (to building); a side (north) setback of eight feet (to balconies) and ten feet (to building); a building height of 75 feet (from Base Flood Elevation to mid -point of decorative roof structure); 131 off - street parking spaces; and a request for a two -year Development Order, pursuant to the Community Development Code Section 2- 802.M, Section 4 -303 and the requirements of the Old Florida District of Beach by Design; and an increase in the maximum density through the allocation of 55 overnight accommodation units from the Hotel Density Reserve created pursuant to Beach by Design, as well as an increase in the percentage of palm trees to 100 percent where 75 percent is allowable, as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program, pursuant to the Community Development Code Section 3- 1202.G. On June 6, 2013, the Development Review Committee (composed of the City's professional staff) will review and determine whether the application demonstates compliance with the City's Community Development Code. Following that review and determination, the Planning Director will issue a Development Order approving, approving with conditions, or denying the application. The earliest date that the City will make a decision on the application will be June 6, 2013. The City encourages you to participate in the review of this application. You may contact me at 562- 4567x2502 or via email at Kevin .Nurnberger @myclearwater.com for further information, visit our office to review the files and /or submit written comments to be considered in the City review of the application. Please be advised that the applicant may submit additional or new information regarding this case which you may review during regular business hours. However, no further notice will be provided to you should the application be amended. An appeal of the decision of the Planning Director may be initiated by the applicant or property owners within the required notice area who present competent substantial evidence at, or prior to, the Development Review Committee meeting on June 6, 2013. An appeal must be filed, including an appeal fee, with the City Clerks Office within seven days of the issuance of the Development Order. Thank you for your interest in the City of Clearwater's development review process. You may access the Planning and Development Department through the City's website: www.myclearwater.com. Sincerely ours, 5/17/ 01 "EQUAL 51PLOYMENT AND AFFllt mm F.AcTlON EMPI.OYEit° Letter 01 Notirfioetion CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING & DFVhLOPMENT DEPAR1 ML N POST Qrrlc E Boa 4748; (,LFa vwrrx, FLORIDA 33758 -4748 MuNIcipm Swims ims BUILDING, 100 So'u m Mmu AVENUE, CLFARWATFR, FLORIDA 33 ?56 2jArER, `, TELEPHONE (727) 562 -4567 FAx (727) 562 -4865 Kevin Nurnberger Planner III 5/17/2013 Letler OF Notification "EQUAL EMPLoymENTT A-D AmnIM nw AmON EHPI,OYEIt° Nurnberger, Kevin From: Joe Burdette Oburdette505 @tampabay.rr.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2013 1:23 PM To: Nurnberger, Kevin Cc: 'Istvan Peteranecz'; 'Austin'; 'Landon; kcole @hwhiaw.com; DJD @TheDeNunzioGroup.com Subject: FLS2013 -02006 Reponse to Comment Kevin Nurnberger Clearwater Planning Department Via Email Re: FLS2013 -02006 Kevin In response to your email to Randy Austin, please accept this as our response to Item #13 to provide a statement as to why we are requesting a two -year development order For the past five years hotel financing has been practically non - existent not only in Clearwater, but in the entire state of Florida. At the present time the city of Clearwater has at least four hotels that have been approved in the last three or so years that have not been able to obtain financing for their projects. This would include the Patel Project on Beachwalk which was approved in 2006. As it sits today, the financing market has not shown any signs of "loosening" for hotel projects and it is anyone's guess as to when that might happen. The owner of this project is willing to take the risk that the financial markets may change soon, but one -year is not sufficient, hence the request for a two -year development order. Should you need any further information please let me know. Thank You Joe Burdette Owner's Representative Bay Esplanade Project, LLC. �' � �CLLARWATER �,BEyAtHi -. COMMERCE W4VW.lEA~ (N(�HA AIL M CLEARWATER'S TOURISM CHAMBER Promoting Tourism and the Business Community EXECUTIVE OFFICERS Eric Waltz Sandpead Resort Chairman ofihe Ronal Clearwater Beach Chamber Louis Stavropoulos 333 C. S. Gulfview Blvd. Supermarket -Nice Vim Chairman Clearwater Beach FL 33767 Jason Gibertoni Florida Free Rides May 16, 2013 Treasurer/Afembership Chair Carol Mears Coolers Restaurant R Bar Mayor George Cretekos Secretary 112 S Osceola Ave Darlene Kole Clearwater, FL 33756 Clearwater Beach Chamber PresidentiCE'O Paul Andre%vs spltard's Bench Reson Past C,hainnan Dear Mayor George Cretekos Pn , CIIAIRIIEN /DIRECTORS On behalf of our Board of Directors, we wish to extend full support .for Fran Bartlett Lobster Pot Bistro the proposed Fairfield Inn (DeNunzio Project). RResttirmtl Ileek Chair The proposed Fairfield Inn at 650 Bay Esplanade, we are told has Philippe Beau I'niversityofBordeaux already fulfilled all the criteria for Beach by Design. The DeNunzio Edttcalion and Market Research Chair Jen Carlisle Group is currently negotiating with Fairfield Inns (Marriott) for a flag Frencha is Tourism Mnrkelin g Council Chair as we understand. If the obtain this desi gn ation or any other reputable Frank Dante flag and meet every requirement under Beach by Design, we will fully Clearwater Marine Aquarium Chnalber Liaison support this project as City Staff has given it the green light. Bob Griffin Griffin Productions Rede.veloprue at/GovernmentIBItshtess Economic Development Chair Michele Johnson Since y Sandpcarl Beach Resort Chalk If'nik Chair T'rlsha Rodriguez The Tropical Boat Tours Special Events Chair DIRECTORS Darlene Cagle Flower Market Florist Eric Waltz ear Cheatham Cl Chairman of the Board Clearwater Gas System Theresa Crane Progress Energy Clearwater Beach Chamber of Commerce Nickolas Ekonomides Nickolas rkonomides. P.A. Alan Ebbert cc: Doreen Hock- DiPolito, Jay Polglaze, Bill Jonson, Paul F. Gibson, Frenchy's'Resmumnts Jack Guy Bill Horne Sheraton Sand Key Resort Jean lingan Sunsets at Pier 60 Daily Festivals Iloyt Hamilton Palm Pavilion Inn Emily llarris Surf Style Retail Management Brian Kramer Hyan Regency Beach Resort fi Spa Joanna Patterson Nihon Clearwater Beach Gaillard St.Clair JMC Resort Properties Jana wrettos HES S ?roovus Bank Crabb's Wright Bar P. O. Box 3573 � Clearwater Beach FL 33767 � (727) 447.7600 Crabby'$ Bar aF Gnll Bcachwalk > Fax (727) 443.7812 * U.S. Toll Free 888.799.3199 i r . twater U Case # DVA2013 -02001 SIGN POSTING ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I hereby acknowledge receipt of public notice signs to post on property I own and /or represent that is being considered by the City of Clearwater for a land use plan amendment, rezoning and Development Agreement and agree to post said signs on the subject property in a location where it is capable of being read from the most significant adjacent street a minimum of 10 days before the Community Development Board Meeting. Property Owner or Authorized Representative: 4�Z4//,5 Date Community Development Board Meeting Date: • June 18, 2013 City Council Public Hearing Dates: • July 18, 2013 The sign shall be posted on the property no later than: June 7, 2013 fofj r ** ,�$, CITY OF CLEARWATER PLAN VIIVG & IiE-vFLOPMI NT DI PART MINT VT i Posy QITlc,F Boa X748; GLLl;AARWATrR, FLnRIDA 33758 4748 MITVICfPAL SERvicF_9 BufMING, .100 Sourim MYRYLE AYEtiIIE, CU RWATFR, FLoRWA 33756 °7ArER�k°` t EI.EPHONE (727) 5624567 FAx ( 727) 5624865 May 17, 2013 RE: NOTICE OF FILING AN APPLICATION FOR FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AT 650 BAY ESPLANADE (FLS2013- 02006); OWNED BY: BAY ESPLANADE PROJECT LLC To Surrounding Property Owners: As a property owner within 500 feet of 650 BAY ESPLANADE, the City of Clearwater Planning and Development Department gives notice that an application has been submitted for Flexible Standard Development application to permit a 102 -room overnight accommodation use in the Tourist (T) District with a lot area of 41,232 square feet (0.95 acres), lot widths of 104 feet along Bay Esplanade (east); 289.98 feet along Bay Esplanade (south) and 182.06 feet along Poinsettia Avenue (west); a front (east) setback of 13 feet (to building); a front (south) setback of 15 feet (to building); a front (west) setback of 23 feet (to building); a side (north) setback of eight feet (to balconies) and ten feet (to building); a building height of 75 feet (from Base Flood Elevation to mid -point of decorative roof structure); 131 off- street parking spaces; and a request for a two -year Development Order, pursuant to the Community Development Code Section 2- 802.M, Section 4 -303 and the requirements of the Old Florida District of Beach by Design; and an increase in the maximum density through the allocation of 55 overnight accommodation units from the Hotel Density Reserve created pursuant to Beach by Design, as well as an increase in the percentage of palm trees to 100 percent where 75 percent is allowable, as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program, pursuant to the Community Development Code Section 3- 1202.G. On June 6, 2013, the Development Review Committee (composed of the City's professional staff) will review and determine whether the application demonstates compliance with the City's Community Development Code. Following that review and determination, the Planning Director will issue a Development Order approving, approving with conditions, or denying the application. The earliest date that the City will make a decision on the application will be June 6, 2013. The City encourages you to participate in the review of this application. You may contact me at 562- 4567x2502 or via email at Kevin .Nurnberger @myclearwater.com for further information, visit our office to review the files and /or submit written comments to be considered in the City review of the application. Please be advised that the applicant may submit additional or new information regarding this case which you may review during regular business hours. However, no further notice will be provided to you should the application be amended. An appeal of the decision of the Planning Director may be initiated by the applicant or property owners within the required notice area who present competent substantial evidence at, or prior to, the Development Review Committee meeting on June 6, 2013. An appeal must be filed, including an appeal fee, with the City Clerks Office within seven days of the issuance of the Development Order. Thank you for your interest in the City of Clearwater's development review process. You may access the Planning and Development Department through the City's website: www.myclearwater.com. Sincer yours, 5/17/2 13 lQu3AL EitpLoYMFVT Ayn _NFFwiATR F. ACTION Ertpmy.ot" Letter OI Nofifi a ion tLCxtlpl - PAM DUBOV, CFA, CAE Pinellas County Property Appraiser www.pcpao.org pam @pcpao.org Run Date: 17 May 2013 Subject Parcel: 05- 29- 15- 54756- 082 -0120 Radius: 500 feet Parcel Count: 162 Note: Parcels with protected address status are not included in this report. Total pages: 7 Public information is furnished by the Property Appraiser's Office and must be accepted by the recipient with the understanding that the information received was developed and collected for the purpose of developing a Property Value Roll per Florida Statute. The Pinellas County Property Appraiser's Office makes no warranties, expressed or implied, concerning the accuracy, completeness, reliability or suitability of this information for any other particular use. The Pinellas County Property Appraiser's Office assumes no liability whatsoever associated with the use or misuse of such information. 0 MAIN BRANCH- COURTHOUSE 315 Court St. — 2 "d Floor Clearwater, FL 33756 MAIL: PO Box 1957 Clearwater, FL 33757 TEL: (727) 464 -3207 FAX: (727) 464 -3448 HEARING IMPAIRED: (727) 464 -3370 EXEMPTIONS: TEL: (727) 464 -3294 FAX: (727) 464 -3408 COMMERCIAL APPRAISALS: TEL: (727) 464 -3284 RESIDENTIAL APPRAISALS: TEL: (727) 464 -3643 (CND ❑ NORTH COUNTY ❑ TYRONE (SOUTH) ❑ MID - COUNTY 29269 US Highway 19 N 1800 66TH St. N CUSTOMER SERVICE CENTER— WALK -IN Clearwater, FL 33761 St. Petersburg, FL 33710 13025 Starkey Rd., Largo (Tax Collector) TEL: (727) 464 -8780 TEL: (727) 582 -7652 TANGIBLE PERSONAL PROPERTY FAX: (727) 464 -8794 FAX: (727) 582 -7610 TPP TEL: (727) 464 -8484 TPP FAX: (727) 464 -8488 MAIL: PO Box 1957 — Clearwater, FL 33757 SUNSET COTTAGES LLC SUNSET COTTAGES LLC M M M HOMECARE LLC 610 MANDALAY AVE 610 MANDALAY AVE 5801 ULMERTON RD STE 200 CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1632 CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1632 CLEARWATER FL 33760 -3951 REEVES, RONALD A M M M HOMECARE LLC BAY ESPLANADE HOLDINGS LLC REEVES, BARBARA J 5801 ULMERTON RD STE 200 107 MASTERS LN 3912 E HILLS DR CLEARWATER FL 33760 -3951 SAFETY HARBOR FL 34695 -3722 SAINT JOSEPH MO 64503 -2239 KEYS, RANDALL D NYLANDER, MAGNUS ROLLINSON, ANN C 4014 W MULLEN AVE NYLANDER, MARINA 1364 ELLINGTON RD TAMPA FL 33609 -4429 AKERBARSTIGEN 28 SOUTH WINDSOR CT 06074 -2600 125 56 ALVSJO STOCKHOLM DOM, MARY KRUEGER, MARGARET E M M M HOMECARE LLC TANGAS, GUS PO BOX 20067 5801 ULMERTON RD STE 200 65 SOMERSET ST ST PETERSBURG FL 33742 -0067 CLEARWATER FL 33760 -3951 CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1547 DE NUNZIO GROUP LLC MAVITY, LEON L WITHAM, DARLENE 305 CAMBRIDGE ST STE 3 661 POINSETTIA AVE APT 307 55 SOMERSET ST UNIT 1 CAMBRIDGE MA 02141 -1207 CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1537 CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1546 FOLINO, SERGIO NATSIS, EVANGELOS SMITH, MARK A 181 TILFORD RD NATSIS, MARIA SMITH, CHARLENE S OAKVILLE ON L61- 4Z2 622 POINSETTIA AVE 701 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1638 CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1409 WAGNER, LARRY H THE MASTORIDES, NICHOLAS SAGONIAS, STAMATINA 240 WINDWARD PSE # 1202 MASTORIDES, LACEY 235 OLD OAK CIR CLEARWATER FL 33767 -2249 2187 VIOLA DR PALM HARBOR FL 34683 -5862 CLEARWATER FL 33764 -3738 PENTHOUSE SHORES ASSN INC M M M HOMECARE LLC M M M HOMECARE LLC 661 POINSETTIA AVE 5801 ULMERTON RD STE 200 5801 ULMERTON RD STE 200 CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1561 CLEARWATER FL 33760 -3951 CLEARWATER FL 33760 -3951 M M M HOMECARE LLC GEHRAND, GERALD L WINCHESTER, GARY 5801 ULMERTON RD STE 200 4500 140TH AVE N STE 109 WINCHESTER, PAMELA CLEARWATER FL 33760 -3951 CLEARWATER FL 33762 -3848 17111 HANNA RD LUTZ FL 33549 -5666 M M M HOMECARE LLC E B C 0 LLC LUCKY STAR LAND TRUST 5801 ULMERTON RD STE 200 145 BAYVIEW DR SHERMAN, DIANE L THE CLEARWATER FL 33760 -3951 BELLEAIR FL 33756 -1403 3380 LEPRECHAUN LN PALM HARBOR FL 34683 -2326 �A MONACO RESORT CONDO ASSN INC MAYES, ANTHONY AMERPOL HOTELS & MOTELS INC 648 POINSETTIA AVE N GOODACRE- MAYES, BARBARA 457 S ELLIS ST CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1513 1 SCHOOL ROAD BENSENVILLE IL 60106 -2646 SIBEL HEDINGHAM HALSTEAD ESSEX C09 3NR CONCLEAR II LLC SOMERSET PLACE LLC G S J FL INVESTMENT INC 1000 MARKET ST STE 300 9 SUNSET BAY DR 1004 US HIGHWAY 19 N STE 102 PORTSMOUTH NH 03801 -3358 BELLEAIR FL 33756 -1644 HOLIDAY FL 34691 -5630 M M M HOMECARE LLC M M M HOMECARE LLC SILLASEN, SEAJAYE 5801 ULMERTON RD STE 200 5801 ULMERTON RD STE 200 12313 W LOUISIANA AVE CLEARWATER FL 33760 -3951 CLEARWATER FL 33760 -3951 LAKEWOOD CO 80228 -3829 M M M HOMECARE LLC M M M HOMECARE LLC M M M HOMECARE LLC 5801 ULMERTON RD STE 200 5801 ULMERTON RD STE 200 5801 ULMERTON RD STE 200 CLEARWATER FL 33760 -3951 CLEARWATER FL 33760 -3951 CLEARWATER FL 33760 -3951 KIELMANN, LOTHAR E SEIFERT, MICHAEL E SILLASEN, SEAJAYE NODGE, WENDY K SEIFERT, NANCY S 12313 W LOUISIANA AVE 35154 LEON ST 5825 PERSIMMON DR LAKEWOOD CO 80228 -3829 LIVONIA MI 48150 -2668 MADISON WI 53711 -5003 673 BAY ESPLANADE LLC PANGRITZ, GABRIELLA M M M M HOMECARE LLC G P T LLC 10306 ANTILLES DR 5801 ULMERTON RD STE 200 1596 SHIRLEY PL LARGO FL 33774 CLEARWATER FL 33760 -3951 LARGO FL 33770 -2292 GEVERS,THEODOOR KROMER, JOHN WENGER, TERRY AERTS, DENISE KROMER, JANET WENGER, CARLA 661 POINSETTIA AVE APT 201 14629 GALT LAKE DR 363 SOUTH 350 WEST CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1535 TAMPA FL 33626 -3362 VAL PARAISO IN 46385 -9630 SEA SIDE ON ESPLANADE LLC M M M HOMECARE LLC NORTH SUNRISE MOTEL II LLC 345 HAMDEN DR 5801 ULMERTON RD STE 200 175 US ALT 19 S CLEARWATER FL 33767 -2450 CLEARWATER FL 33760 -3951 PALM HARBOR FL 34683 -5541 PALMA, GEORGE M M M HOMECARE LLC M M M HOMECARE LLC 1200 WYNCHGATE ST 5801 ULMERTON RD STE 200 5801 ULMERTON RD STE 200 OAKVILLE ON L6L 21-4 CLEARWATER FL 33760 -3951 CLEARWATER FL 33760 -3951 SNO -BIRD PROP INC DIDOMIZIO INVESTMENTS INC PASQUALE, JACK R THE 10 PRINCE ST 648 POINSETTIA AVE N PASQUALE, PATRICIA A THE CUMBERLAND CTR ME 04021 -4007 CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1513 1433 NORMAN DR DARIEN IL 60561 -4434 LUCKY STAR LAND TRUST LABRICCIOSA, ELENA M M M HOMECARE LLC SHERMAN, DIANE L THE 653 MANDALAY AVE 5801 ULMERTON RD STE 200 3380 LEPRECHAUN LN CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1523 CLEARWATER FL 33760 -3951 PALM HARBOR FL 34683 -2326 FRIARS MINOR ORD OF ST FRANCIS HAYS, WILLIAM D FIVE PALM CONDO ASSN INC PROVINCIAL CURIA 661 POINSETTIA AVE APT 304 673 BAY ESPLANADE 125 THOMPSON ST CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1536 CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1503 NEW YORK NY 10012 -3110 MC FADDEN, ARLENE S M M M HOMECARE LLC M M M HOMECARE LLC MC FADDEN, ROBERT G 5801 ULMERTON RD STE 200 5801 ULMERTON RD STE 200 661 POINSETTIA AVE APT 204 CLEARWATER FL 33760 -3951 CLEARWATER FL 33760 -3951 CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1535 CAPRI MOTEL CONDO ASSN SOMERSET PLACE INC PETER PAN DEVELOPMENTS LLC 55 SOMERSET ST APT 3 610 MANDALAY AVE 5210 WEBB RD CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1546 CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1632 TAMPA FL 33615 J B BARNES LLC EYLER, DONALD C FULLER, ROBERT A JR 155 SANGRA CT # 7 EYLER, DANIEL N FULLER, DANIEL C STREAMWOOD IL 60107 -2913 701 CLEARBROOKE CT 2114 CENTERVIEW CT S VANDALIA OH 45377 -1522 CLEARWATER FL 33759 -1009 MONACO RESORT CONDO ASSN INC SPEAR, ROBERT E THE SPERELAKIS, SOPHIA ANN 648 POINSETTIA AVE N 102 CARRIAGE SQUARE CT SPERELAKIS, THOMAS ANDREAS CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1513 HENDERSONVLLE NC 28791 -1396 6327 JAMISON WAY LIBERTY TOWNSHIP OH 45044 -9505 BERETA, DEBORAH A M M M HOMECARE LLC COATES 1 INC BERETA, GERARD J 5801 ULMERTON RD STE 200 873 ISLAND WAY 311 ARLINGTON ST CLEARWATER FL 33760 -3951 CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1826 INKSTER MI 48141 -1299 LENTRICCHIA, KARIN S LIVING TRUST E B C 0 LLC M M M HOMECARE LLC LENTRICCHIA, KARIN S THE 145 BAYVIEW DR 5801 ULMERTON RD STE 200 661 POINSETTIA AVE APT 303 BELLEAIR FL 33756 -1403 CLEARWATER FL 33760 -3951 CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1536 MAHONEY, STEVEN T G S J FL INVESTMENT INC BAY ESPLANADE PROJECT LLC MAHONEY, LETIZIA 1004 US HIGHWAY 19 N STE 102 305 CAMBRIDGE ST STE 3 5343 GROVEMONT DR HOLIDAY FL 34691 -5630 CAMBRIDGE MA 02141 -1207 ELKRIDGE MD 21075 -5564 MOUNTAIN TOP N C LLC PETER PAN DEV M M M HOMECARE LLC PO BOX 4087 610 MANDALAY NE 5801 ULMERTON RD STE 200 CLEARWATER FL 33758 -4087 CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1632 CLEARWATER FL 33760 -3951 M M M HOMECARE LLC DE & SC LLC M M M HOMECARE LLC 5801 ULMERTON RD STE 200 821 LANCIA LN 5801 ULMERTON RD STE 200 CLEARWATER FL 33760 -3951 GALLOWAY OH 43119 CLEARWATER FL 33760 -3951 MORRISON, GEORGE ROBERT ALBERT NICHOLAS, JERRY ZHANG, FUGUI 4300 RUE ST AMBROISE # A604 C/O NICHOLAS, PENNY WANG, XUAN MONTREAL OB H4C 3R3 145 ISABELLA ST 5581 HIPPOLYTE- LANCTOT ST PARRY SOUND ONT P2A 1 N3 MONTERAL QC H1 K 5G6 LIRA, NESTOR NORTH CLEARWATER BEACH DEV LLC M M M HOMECARE LLC 9330 JAMAICA DR PO BOX 4189 5801 ULMERTON RD STE 200 MIAMI FL 33189 -1706 CLEARWATER FL 33758 -4189 CLEARWATER FL 33760 -3951 M M M HOMECARE LLC ROYAL NORTH BEACH LLC PETER PAN DEVELOPMENTS LLC 5801 ULMERTON RD STE 200 PO BOX 703 5210 WEBB RD CLEARWATER FL 33760 -3951 ODESSA FL 33556 -0703 TAMPA FL 33615 -4518 M M M HOMECARE LLC VASIL, VALERIE M M M HOMECARE LLC 5801 ULMERTON RD STE 200 711 OSCEOLA RD 5801 ULMERTON RD STE 200 CLEARWATER FL 33760 -3951 BELLEAIR FL 33756 -1024 CLEARWATER FL 33760 -3951 M M M HOMECARE LLC SPERELAKIS, ANTHONY MOSSER, RICHARD S 5801 ULMERTON RD STE 200 SPERELAKIS -BABB, CHRISTINE MARIE 326 WESTEIGHTS DR CLEARWATER FL 33760 -3951 10130 SLEEPYRIDGE DR KITCHENER ON N2N 1 K1 LOVELAND OH 45140 -1922 LONG, MARIAN C M M M HOMECARE LLC CIUCEVICH, JOSEPH 661 POINSETTIA AVE APT 104 5801 ULMERTON RD STE 200 736 BRUCE AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1534 CLEARWATER FL 33760 -3951 CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1418 HILDEBRAND, WILLIAM 0 JR FORLINI FAMILY REV LIVING TRUST M M M HOMECARE LLC 661 POINSETTIA AVE APT 107 FORLINI, DOMENICO G THE 5801 ULMERTON RD STE 200 CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1534 808 MANDALAY AVE CLEARWATER FL 33760 -3951 CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1324 BEARDSLEY, JAMES M BAY ESPLANADE PROJECT LLC SILVEIRA, CHARLENE 15 MAYFAIR LN C/O DE NUNZIO, DUSTIN MOFFIT, MARJORIE BUFFALO NY 14201 -1522 305 CAMBRIDGE ST STE 3 51 ACACIA ST CAMBRIDGE MA 02141 -1207 CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1404 BAY ESPLANADE PROJECT LLC E B C 0 LLC ANGO, RICHARD 305 CAMBRIDGE ST STE 3 145 BAYVIEW DR 54 SOMERSET ST CAMBRIDGE MA 02141 -1207 BELLEAIR FL 33756 -1403 CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1543 BOERNER, SUSANA B M M M HOMECARE LLC M M M HOMECARE LLC 112 S LAUBER WAY 5801 ULMERTON RD STE 200 5801 ULMERTON RD STE 200 TAMPA FL 33609 -2615 CLEARWATER FL 33760 -3951 CLEARWATER FL 33760 -3951 M M M HOMECARE LLC M M M HOMECARE LLC MIRANDA, ALPHONSE 5801 ULMERTON RD STE 200 5801 ULMERTON RD STE 200 2710 HIBISCUS DR W CLEARWATER FL 33760 -3951 CLEARWATER FL 33760 -3951 BELLEAIR BEACH FL 33786 -3528 SMITH, IRENE V LA QUALE, GERARDO FOLEY, CATHERINE G PO BOX 113 LA QUALE, AMELIA P 661 POINSETTIA AVE APT 108 WILTON NH 03086 -0113 594 MAIN ST CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1534 EAST GREENWICH RI 02818 -3608 LEWINSKI, WOJCIECH BAY ESPLANADE PROJECT LLC 1066363 ONTARIO LTD LEWINSKI, HANNA 305 CAMBRIDGE ST STE 3 152 CLARENDON ST 661 POINSETTIA AVE APT 306 CAMBRIDGE MA 02141 -1207 SOUTHAMPTON ON NOH 21-0 CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1537 CHMELA, EVA E THOMPSON, MICHAEL S M M M HOMECARE LLC CHMELA, WALTER F THOMPSON, MARIA 5801 ULMERTON RD STE 200 10 COURTWOOD PL 5 DRYLAND RD BOROUGH GREEN CLEARWATER FL 33760 -3951 TORONTO ON M2K 1Z9 SEVEN OAKS KENT TN15 9SG RHOADS, JEFFREY L THE BAY ESPLANADE PROJECT LLC LETOURNEAU, WILLIAM T PO BOX 861 305 CAMBRIDGE ST STE 3 HIRSCH, DEBORA A DUNEDIN FL 34697 -0861 CAMBRIDGE MA 02141 -1207 661 POINSETTIA AVE APT 305 CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1536 GTE FLORIDA INCORPORATED ROZENITS, FRED PETER PAN DEVELOPMENTS LLC C/O PROPERTY TAX SECTION ROZENITS, ANNA 5210 WEBB RD PO BOX 152206 31 ISLAND WAY APT 1002 TAMPA FL 33615 -4518 IRVING TX 75015 -2206 CLEARWATER FL 33767 -2207 DE NUNZIO GROUP LLC BAYESPLANADE.COM LLC SEA SIDE ON ESPLANADE LLC 305 CAMBRIDGE ST STE 3 627 BAY ESPLANADE 345 HAMDEN DR CAMBRIDGE MA 02141 -1207 CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1617 CLEARWATER FL 33767 -2450 NORTH CLEARWATER BEACH DEVELOPMENT BAYESPLANADE.COM LLC BAYESPLANADE.COM LLC PO BOX 4189 627 BAY ESPLANDE 627 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33758 -4189 CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1617 CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1617 SEA SIDE ON ESPLANADE LLC THURMOND, CAROL HESS LIVING TRUST DEAN REAL ESTATE INV INC 345 HAMDEN DR THURMOND, CAROL HESS THE 647 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 -2450 829 OLEANDER DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1617 AIKEN SC 29801 -5165 SURF & SAND FLORIDA LLC SURF & SAND FLORIDA LLC SURF & SAND FLORIDA LLC 345 HAMDEN DR 345 HAMDEN DR 345 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 -2450 CLEARWATER FL 33767 -2450 CLEARWATER FL 33767 -2450 KELLEY,PAUL KELLEY, TRACEY 667 BAY ESPLANDE CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1550 PENNOCK, ROBERT M II VAN ASDALE, MELODIE A 665 BAY ESPLANADE APT 3 CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1598 BAYESPLANADE.COM LLC 627 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1617 SEA SIDE ON ESPLANADE LLC 345 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 -2450 PENNOCK, ROBERT M II VAN ASDALE, MELODIE A 665 BAY ESPLANADE APT 3 CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1598 ALBRECHT, YVETTE CHURCH FARM BARN - -- CHURCH LANE SHURDINGTON CHELTENHAM GLOS GL51 4TQ KELLEY, PAUL KELLEY, TRACEY 667 BAY ESPLANDE CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1550 t Nurnberger, Kevin From: Matzke, Lauren Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2013 4:24 PM To: Jackson, Matthew; Nurnberger, Kevin Subject: FW: A04- 01420: Development Agreements - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Dougall- Sides, Leslie Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 12:34 PM To: Dewitt, Gina; Matzke, Lauren; Tefft, Robert Subject: RE: A04- 01420: Development Agreements My issues are: Consultation with Legal prior to implementing creative concepts which could have legal consequences; Forwarding draft DVAs for review to Legal prior to Legal's receiving DRC agenda packet, Coordination with Legal re any comments that we have; Planner providing ORLS with ,,_: . information necessary to advertise DVA correctly [density, intensity, height] ;; Keeping Legal in the loop prior to CDB and CC meetings, especially re any changes; For DVAs where substantial opposition is expected, having pre- hearing preparation meeting; Obtaining DVA in electronic form and ensuring that applicant provides Legal with DVA executed by applicant with all Exhibits and with blanks filled in [e.g., FLD No.] prior to CC Worksession. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Dewitt, Gina Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 11:22 AM To: Matzke, Lauren; Tefft, Robert Cc: Dougall- Sides, Leslie Subject: RE: A04- 01420: Development Agreements My main concern is that they know that we need a final, signed agreement before the DVA goes to worksession. That and that all DVA's require a resolution. I know Leslie will have more input. regarding Legal's involvement during the process. Take care of the baby! - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Matzke, Lauren Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 10:17 AM To: Dewitt, Gina; Tefft, Robert Cc: Dougall- Sides, Leslie Subject: RE: Development Agreements I had only pulled together relatively loose procedures. Not sure if Robert had anything together or not. This is on my work program for this year, so it is something to definitely get done. Won't be in the next couple of weeks, but I can definitely work with you as I pull them together. If you have any comments off the top of your head that you want to be sure get included, please feel free to send some bullets over. It seems to be fresh on your mind (understandably) so it is probably best to capture at least some of your notes now. Leslie - I'd like you to chime in on how Planners should collaborate with Legal (you and /or VI Pam) during all the back and forth that can take place before DRC (assuming this still happens - it did on the couple of DVAs I was part of or watched closely). I know each one is different and the level of involvement varies, but that is something key to capture since it is definitely handled differently than typical cases. I know the basic key things to remember are the need to include height, density, etc. in title /agenda item (CDB) /ads and making sure Yellow Signs are posted (normal for long range, not for development review). At time of Novus, Planner needs to attach resolution with DVA and any other exhibits as worked out in the DVA. Feel free to jot things down and send them over. I'm out today (sick kid) which will throw me a little further behind, but I can keep this towards the top of my list and try to get to it in the next month or so. - Lauren From: Dewitt, Gina Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 12:21 PM To: Tefft, Robert; Matzke, Lauren Cc: Dougall- Sides, Leslie Subject: Development Agreements Hi Lauren and Robert, I know Lauren was working on procedures for your department. Do you have written procedures for Development Agreements? If so, can I see them? I ask because we've had different planners doing DVA's and we have had different issues with the procedures. I was hoping to see your procedures and possibly make some suggestions so the planners know what we need during the process. Thanks! Gina DeWitt Legal Office Administrator City of Clearwater 727.562.4011 gina.dewitt @myclearwater.com 2 l ,f II I I I I 1 _ _,� of rum �,euc .. I i i i 3 ..I .au,os—s SI I OPPxfv i o,r ., .c r z m � — is Z O ir I I Pa0lELT TIrtE: I >. y FIRST FLOOR PLAN •• • s -L PLANNING DEPARTMENT / CITY OF CLEARWATER 650 Bay Esplanade: Ovemight Accommodation DEN 12.02 Level Principal Use Accessory Use Garage Notes —..T— L -6 16,125 0 0 Plans L -5 16,125 0 0 Level L -4 15,505 620 Ezemise Room as Accessory L-3 5,080 0 18510 ii--- L -2 2,650 2,690 18510 Meeting ROOM arid Prefunction as Accessory 2013.04.10 L -1 4,015 1,340 16,300 Breakfast Area as Accessory; Level 1 is above Base Flood Elevation Totals 59,500 4,650 53,320 7.82% %Accessory to Principal Use A -001 t { I I I I — ,v FvE r i r I mM, it 1 ID I ......__........... — i � I r -I z g1 I w w I UJ I) I r a..ww I aaaue:errmE. CL cr I -- v v ___r - -�___ �_ _______ _. - y m d cm ,IESP�/ m m° Z 0 E cc w a m II / SECO MD FLOOR PLAN A`= I / ' �DEN12.02 Plans Level 2 ,,,m rs�E dre ua�so um mn�m „Kn 2013.04.10 ..aso n,,m f•M ns.o um urm .«unn�mwoRU.�,b,..K...e:. sren. ra„e saso s,,>o v.m d .� o A -002 I I w a z w z a wIa 5", Z Q U w w N w Z Y O cr m a- U w FOURTH FLOOR PLAN 31 KEYS r -,a I I v c� � gv I o � m r ss,wo ss,wo 0 .m ss,y,m .a,s s,no vmo x J Z J p� O o d y O m m N f . m � c y E m U m L) Plans Level 4 2013.04.10 A -004 II I I I .,. .,) .,. .,. IG I 1 1 i I i i i I I I I i I I I g w � a I I I W EU I gl � I _ 000E I I I �i m v� se sa sn sa s>s sz. >a s:: IK ow w n � E — _— �— � - - - -- - I I v �.m,waE.aEa oE, w e a cr U o I I i w N m np I ?IN E N m> U m U I /I I FIFTH FLOOR PLAN 32 KEYS Ad_ I/ DEN12.02 D- TIL Plans awmrEmn.ea. oan�aaa.naam,be Level 5 ssaoo �swEw,E. ss ao 0 I.�o Iwo ,�W.�ma9aa�,r 2013.04.10 .rn ss m Ea 3S0 3yro 19,fi00 auah�RmmaNlulunbna.muorr 9,afE. a,65p 3p10 39.0 &u9pn.aea a,acaeaom.lau134a0ow Eau noaJE4wibn Tone 9)b90 9P30 Si,mO A -005 I l I l i ' I TI W W UJ U I I I � I — i q � FD N N 1 O o U a co Z m w E I I 1 i so 0) m co m r I SIXTH FLOOR PLAN 30 KEYS Ap- DEN12.02 Plans Level 6 w ° 2013.04.10 A -006 PP- I V 1W 12WINW, Am NOW .150 1!pj P lilt e fit x- - "1010 jF- U&I W. '—s-80111—U002 poor Immuramor won 1" NMI on 0 mu Ito Eli a" AM an no B: 7LP it I Building Color 1 Building Color 2 BM OC -108 BM 2097 -50 Pale Moon Hint of Mauve 4 MATERIALS LEGEND Roof: Color 3 Railings: Color 4 Red Tile BM 1613 Silent Night Red Tile Roof - - Stucco Trim, Color 2 Stucco, Color 2 Signage Location. Prefinished metal railings, typical. White Stucco body Color 2 Stucco, Color 1 Red tile roof Stucco Trim, Color 2 Stucco, Color 1 Building Base Color 2. West Elevation FIM � r d U O T tu d N O W � N m C m :3 m ap Z w a 41 m E U m U Roh DEN12.02 East 8 West Elevations ENLARGED TYPICAL BUILDING ELEVATION �- 2012.04.10 3 East Elevation tE, f A -008 torn, LOX, '"� � CITY OF CLEARWATER s m PLANNING & DEvaopmhn'r DEPARTMENT / POST Omlre Boa 4748, CLHtitWATCR, FLORIDA 337 >8 -t748 MUNTciPAL SERvicES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH M5'RTLE AVENUE, CLEAMATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (7127) 562 476% FAX ( 727) 5624865 April 16, 2013 RE: NOTICE OF FILING AN APPLICATION FOR FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AT 650 BAY ESPLANADE (FLS2013- 02006); OWNED BY: BAY ESPLANADE PROJECT LLC To Surrounding Property Owners: As a property owner within 500 feet of 650 BAY ESPLANADE, the City of Clearwater Planning and Development Department gives notice that an application has been submitted for Flexible Standard Development application to permit a 102 -room overnight accommodation use in the Tourist (T) District with a lot area of 41,232 square feet (0.95 acres), lot widths of 104 feet along Bay Esplanade (east); 289.98 feet along Bay Esplanade (south) and 182.06 feet along Poinsettia Avenue (west); a front (east) setback of 15 feet (to building); a front (south) setback of 15 feet (to building); a front (west) setback of 21 feet (to building); a side (north) setback of 5 feet (to balcony) and 10 feet (to building); a building height of 65 feet (from Base Flood Elevation to flat roof); and 129 off - street parking spaces, pursuant to the Community Development Code Section 2 -802.M and the requirements of the Old Florida District of Beach by Design; and an increase in the maximum density through the allocation of 55 overnight accommodation units from the Hotel Density Reserve created pursuant to Beach by Design, as well as an increase in the percentage of palm trees to 100 percent where 75 percent is allowable, as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program, pursuant to the Community Development Code Section 3- 1202.G. On May 2, 2013, the Development Review Committee (composed of the City's professional staff) will review and determine whether the application demonstates compliance with the City's Community Development Code. Following that review and determination, the Planning Director will issue a Development Order approving, approving with conditions, or denying the application. The earliest date that the City will make a decision on the application will be May 2, 2013. The City encourages you to participate in the review of this application. You may contact me at 562- 4567x2502 or via email at Kevin .Nurnberger @myclearwater.com for further information, visit our office to review the files and /or submit written comments to be considered in the City review of the application. Please be advised that the applicant may submit additional or new information regarding this case which you may review during regular business hours. However, no further notice will be provided to you should the application be amended. An appeal of the decision of the Planning Director may be initiated by the applicant or property owners within the required notice area who present competent substantial evidence at, or prior to, the Development Review Committee meeting on May 2, 2013. An appeal must be filed, including an appeal fee, with the City Clerks Office within seven days of the issuance of the Development Order. Thank you for your interest in the City of Clearwater's development review process. You may access the Planning and Development Department through the City's website: www.myclearwater.com. Since�l yours, 4/16/2013 °EQUAL &PLOFMFN- T AvD -APFuwATIVE ACTION EHPLoiTie Letter Of Nofff —lion FLT PAM DUBOV, CFA, CAE - -- Pinellas County Property Appraiser www.pcpao.org pam@pcpao.org Run Date: 18 Apr 2013 Subject Parcel: 05- 29 -15- 54756- 082 -0120 Radius: 500 feet Parcel Count: 162 Note: Parcels with protected address status are not included in this report. Total pages: 7 Public information is furnished by the Property Appraiser's Office and must be accepted by the recipient with the understanding that the information received was developed and collected for the purpose of developing a Property Value Roll per Florida Statute. The Pinellas County Property Appraiser's Office makes no warranties, expressed or implied, concerning the accuracy, completeness, reliability or suitability of this information for any other particular use. The Pinellas County Property Appraiser's Office assumes no liability whatsoever associated with the use or misuse of such information. 0 MAIN BRANCH- COURTHOUSE EXEMPTIONS: 0 NORTH COUNTY 0 TYRONE (SOUTH) 0 MID - COUNTY 315 Court St. — 2" Floor TEL: (727) 464 -3294 29269 US Highway 19 N 1800 66rN St. N CUSTOMER SERVICE CENTER — WALK -IN Clearwater, FL 33756 FAX: (727) 464 -3408 Clearwater, FL 33761 St. Petersburg, FL 33710 13025 Starkey Rd., Largo (Tax Collector) MAIL: PO Box 1957 COMMERCIAL APPRAISALS: TEL: (727) 464 -8780 TEL: (727) 582 -7652 TANGIBLE PERSONAL PROPERTY Clearwater, FL 33757 TEL: (727) 464 -3284 FAX: (727) 464 -8794 FAX: (727) 582 -7610 TPP TEL: (727) 464 -8484 TEL: (727) 464 -3207 RESIDENTIAL APPRAISALS: TPP FAX: (727) 464 -8488 FAX: (727) 464 -3448 TEL: (727) 464 -3643 (Cli) MAIL: PO Box 1957 — Clearwater, FL 33757 HEARING IMPAIRED: (727) 464 -3370 SUNSET COTTAGES LLC SUNSET COTTAGES LLC M M M HOMECARE LLC 610 MANDALAY AVE 610 MANDALAY AVE 5801 ULMERTON RD STE 200 CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1632 CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1632 CLEARWATER FL 33760 -3951 REEVES, RONALD A M M M HOMECARE LLC BAY ESPLANADE HOLDINGS LLC REEVES, BARBARA J 5801 ULMERTON RD STE 200 107 MASTERS LN 3912 E HILLS DR CLEARWATER FL 33760 -3951 SAFETY HARBOR FL 34695 -3722 SAINT JOSEPH MO 64503 -2239 KEYS, RANDALL D NYLANDER, MAGNUS ROLLINSON, ANN C 4014 W MULLEN AVE NYLANDER, MARINA 1364 ELLINGTON RD TAMPA FL 33609 -4429 AKERBARSTIGEN 28 SOUTH WINDSOR CT 06074 -2600 125 56 ALVSJO STOCKHOLM DOM, MARY KRUEGER, MARGARET E M M M HOMECARE LLC TANGAS, GUS PO BOX 20067 5801 ULMERTON RD STE 200 65 SOMERSET ST ST PETERSBURG FL 33742 -0067 CLEARWATER FL 33760 -3951 CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1547 DE NUNZIO GROUP LLC MAVITY, LEON L WITHAM, DARLENE 305 CAMBRIDGE ST STE 3 661 POINSETTIA AVE APT 307 55 SOMERSET ST UNIT 1 CAMBRIDGE MA 02141 -1207 CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1537 CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1546 FOLINO, SERGIO NATSIS, EVANGELOS SMITH, MARK A 181 TILFORD RD NATSIS, MARIA SMITH, CHARLENE S OAKVILLE ON 1-61- 4Z2 622 POINSETTIA AVE 701 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1638 CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1409 WAGNER, LARRY H THE MASTORIDES, NICHOLAS SAGONIAS, STAMATINA 240 WINDWARD PSE # 1202 MASTORIDES, LACEY 235 OLD OAK CIR CLEARWATER FL 33767 -2249 2187 VIOLA DR PALM HARBOR FL 34683 -5862 CLEARWATER FL 33764 -3738 PENTHOUSE SHORES ASSN INC M M M HOMECARE LLC M M M HOMECARE LLC 661 POINSETTIA AVE 5801 ULMERTON RD STE 200 5801 ULMERTON RD STE 200 CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1561 CLEARWATER FL 33760 -3951 CLEARWATER FL 33760 -3951 M M M HOMECARE LLC GEHRAND, GERALD L WINCHESTER, GARY 5801 ULMERTON RD STE 200 4500 140TH AVE N STE 109 WINCHESTER, PAMELA CLEARWATER FL 33760 -3951 CLEARWATER FL 33762 -3848 17111 HANNA RD LUTZ FL 33549 -5666 M M M HOMECARE LLC E B C 0 LLC LUCKY STAR LAND TRUST 5801 ULMERTON RD STE 200 145 BAYVIEW DR SHERMAN, DIANE L THE CLEARWATER FL 33760 -3951 BELLEAIR FL 33756 -1403 3380 LEPRECHAUN LN PALM HARBOR FL 34683 -2326 MONACO RESORT CONDO ASSN INC MAYES, ANTHONY AMERPOL HOTELS & MOTELS INC 648 POINSETTIA AVE N GOODACRE- MAYES, BARBARA 457 S ELLIS ST CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1513 1 SCHOOL ROAD BENSENVILLE IL 60106 -2646 SIBEL HEDINGHAM HALSTEAD ESSEX C09 3NR CONCLEAR II LLC SOMERSET PLACE LLC G S J FL INVESTMENT INC 1000 MARKET ST STE 300 9 SUNSET BAY DR 1004 US HIGHWAY 19 N STE 102 PORTSMOUTH NH 03801 -3358 BELLEAIR FL 33756 -1644 HOLIDAY FL 34691 -5630 M M M HOMECARE LLC M M M HOMECARE LLC SILLASEN, SEAJAYE 5801 ULMERTON RD STE 200 5801 ULMERTON RD STE 200 12313 W LOUISIANA AVE CLEARWATER FL 33760 -3951 CLEARWATER FL 33760 -3951 LAKEWOOD CO 80228 -3829 M M M HOMECARE LLC M M M HOMECARE LLC M M M HOMECARE LLC 5801 ULMERTON RD STE 200 5801 ULMERTON RD STE 200 5801 ULMERTON RD STE 200 CLEARWATER FL 33760 -3951 CLEARWATER FL 33760 -3951 CLEARWATER FL 33760 -3951 ARMBRUSTER, JOHN KIELMANN, LOTHAR E SEIFERT, MICHAEL E 661 POINSETTIA AVE APT 209 KIELMANN, WENDY SEIFERT, NANCY S CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1535 35154 LEON ST 5825 PERSIMMON DR LIVONIA MI 48150 -2668 MADISON WI 53711 -5003 SILLASEN, SEAJAYE 673 BAY ESPLANADE LLC PANGRITZ, GABRIELLA M 12313 W LOUISIANA AVE G P T LLC 10306 ANTILLES DR LAKEWOOD CO 80228 -3829 1596 SHIRLEY PL LARGO FL 33774 LARGO FL 33770 -2292 M M M HOMECARE LLC GEVERS, THEODOOR KROMER, JOHN 5801 ULMERTON RD STE 200 AERTS, DENISE KROMER, JANET CLEARWATER FL 33760 -3951 661 POINSETTIA AVE APT 201 14629 GALT LAKE DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1535 TAMPA FL 33626 -3362 WENGER, TERRY SEA SIDE ON ESPLANADE LLC M M M HOMECARE LLC WENGER, CARLA 345 HAMDEN DR 5801 ULMERTON RD STE 200 363 SOUTH 350 WEST CLEARWATER FL 33767 -2450 CLEARWATER FL 33760 -3951 VAL PARAISO IN 46385 -9630 NORTH SUNRISE MOTEL II LLC PALMA, GEORGE M M M HOMECARE LLC 175 US ALT 19 S 1200 WYNCHGATE ST 5801 ULMERTON RD STE 200 PALM HARBOR FL 34683 -5541 OAKVILLE ON L6L 21-4 CLEARWATER FL 33760 -3951 M M M HOMECARE LLC SNO -BIRD PROP INC DIDOMIZIO INVESTMENTS INC 5801 ULMERTON RD STE 200 10 PRINCE ST 648 POINSETTIA AVE N CLEARWATER FL 33760 -3951 CUMBERLAND CTR ME 04021 -4007 CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1513 PASQUALE, JACK R THE LUCKY STAR LAND TRUST LABRICCIOSA, ELENA PASQUALE, PATRICIA A THE SHERMAN, DIANE L THE 653 MANDALAY AVE 1433 NORMAN DR 3380 LEPRECHAUN LN CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1523 DARIEN IL 60561 -4434 PALM HARBOR FL 34683 -2326 M M M HOMECARE LLC FRIARS MINOR ORD OF ST FRANCIS HAYS, WILLIAM D 5801 ULMERTON RD STE 200 PROVINCIAL CURIA 661 POINSETTIA AVE APT 304 CLEARWATER FL 33760 -3951 125 THOMPSON ST CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1536 NEW YORK NY 10012 -3110 FIVE PALM CONDO ASSN INC MC FADDEN, ARLENE S M M M HOMECARE LLC 673 BAY ESPLANADE MC FADDEN, ROBERT G 5801 ULMERTON RD STE 200 CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1503 661 POINSETTIA AVE APT 204 CLEARWATER FL 33760 -3951 CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1535 M M M HOMECARE LLC CAPRI MOTEL CONDO ASSN SOMERSET PLACE INC 5801 ULMERTON RD STE 200 55 SOMERSET ST APT 3 610 MANDALAY AVE CLEARWATER FL 33760 -3951 CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1546 CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1632 PETER PAN DEVELOPMENTS LLC J B BARNES LLC EYLER, DONALD C 5210 WEBB RD 155 SANGRA CT # 7 EYLER, DANIEL N TAMPA FL 33615 STREAMWOOD IL 60107 -2913 701 CLEARBROOKE CT VANDALIA OH 45377 -1522 FULLER, ROBERT A JR MONACO RESORT CONDO ASSN INC SPEAR, ROBERT E THE FULLER, DANIEL C 648 POINSETTIA AVE N 102 CARRIAGE SQUARE CT 2114 CENTERVIEW CT S CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1513 HENDERSONVLLE NC 28791 -1396 CLEARWATER FL 33759 -1009 SPERELAKIS, SOPHIA ANN BERETA, DEBORAH A M M M HOMECARE LLC SPERELAKIS, THOMAS ANDREAS BERETA, GERARD J 5801 ULMERTON RD STE 200 6327 JAMISON WAY 311 ARLINGTON ST CLEARWATER FL 33760 -3951 LIBERTY TOWNSHIP OH 45044 -9505 INKSTER MI 48141 -1299 COATES 1 INC LENTRICCHIA, KARIN S LIVING TRUST E B C 0 LLC 873 ISLAND WAY LENTRICCHIA, KARIN S THE 145 BAYVIEW DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1826 661 POINSETTIA AVE APT 303 BELLEAIR FL 33756 -1403 CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1536 M M M HOMECARE LLC MAHONEY, STEVEN T G S J FL INVESTMENT INC 5801 ULMERTON RD STE 200 MAHONEY, LETIZIA 1004 US HIGHWAY 19 N STE 102 CLEARWATER FL 33760 -3951 5343 GROVEMONT DR HOLIDAY FL 34691 -5630 ELKRIDGE MD 21075 -5564 BAY ESPLANADE PROJECT LLC MOUNTAIN TOP N C LLC PETER PAN DEV 305 CAMBRIDGE ST STE 3 PO BOX 4087 610 MANDALAY NE CAMBRIDGE MA 02141 -1207 CLEARWATER FL 33758 -4087 CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1632 M M M HOMECARE LLC M M M HOMECARE LLC EYLER, DONALD C 5801 ULMERTON RD STE 200 5801 ULMERTON RD STE 200 701 CLEARBROOKE CT CLEARWATER FL 33760 -3951 CLEARWATER FL 33760 -3951 VANDALIA OH 45377 -1522 M M M HOMECARE LLC MORRISON, GEORGE ROBERT ALBERT NICHOLAS, JERRY 5801 ULMERTON RD STE 200 4300 RUE ST AMBROISE # A604 C/O NICHOLAS, PENNY CLEARWATER FL 33760 -3951 MONTREAL OB H4C 3R3 145 ISABELLA ST PARRY SOUND ONT P2A 1 N3 ZHANG, FUGUI LIRA, NESTOR NORTH CLEARWATER BEACH DEV LLC WANG, XUAN 9330 JAMAICA DR PO BOX 4189 5581 HIPPOLYTE- LANCTOT ST MIAMI FL 33189 -1706 CLEARWATER FL 33758 -4189 MONTERAL QC H 1 K 5G6 M M M HOMECARE LLC M M M HOMECARE LLC ROYAL NORTH BEACH LLC 5801 ULMERTON RD STE 200 5801 ULMERTON RD STE 200 PO BOX 703 CLEARWATER FL 33760 -3951 CLEARWATER FL 33760 -3951 ODESSA FL 33556 -0703 PETER PAN DEVELOPMENTS LLC M M M HOMECARE LLC VASIL, VALERIE 5210 WEBB RD 5801 ULMERTON RD STE 200 711 OSCEOLA RD TAMPA FL 33615 -4518 CLEARWATER FL 33760 -3951 BELLEAIR FL 33756 -1024 M M M HOMECARE LLC M M M HOMECARE LLC SPERELAKIS, ANTHONY 5801 ULMERTON RD STE 200 5801 ULMERTON RD STE 200 SPERELAKIS -BABB, CHRISTINE MARIE CLEARWATER FL 33760 -3951 CLEARWATER FL 33760 -3951 10130 SLEEPYRIDGE DR LOVELAND OH 45140 -1922 MOSSER, RICHARD S LONG, MARIAN C M M M HOMECARE LLC 326 WESTEIGHTS DR 661 POINSETTIA AVE APT 104 5801 ULMERTON RD STE 200 KITCHENER ON N2N 1K1 CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1534 CLEARWATER FL 33760 -3951 CIUCEVICH, JOSEPH HILDEBRAND, WILLIAM 0 JR FORLINI FAMILY REV LIVING TRUST 736 BRUCE AVE 661 POINSETTIA AVE APT 107 FORLINI, DOMENICO G THE CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1418 CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1534 808 MANDALAY AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1324 M M M HOMECARE LLC BEARDSLEY, JAMES M BAY ESPLANADE PROJECT LLC 5801 ULMERTON RD STE 200 15 MAYFAIR LN C/O DE NUNZIO, DUSTIN CLEARWATER FL 33760 -3951 BUFFALO NY 14201 -1522 305 CAMBRIDGE ST STE 3 CAMBRIDGE MA 02141 -1207 SILVEIRA, CHARLENE BAY ESPLANADE PROJECT LLC E B C 0 LLC MOFFIT, MARJORIE 305 CAMBRIDGE ST STE 3 145 BAYVIEW DR 51 ACACIA ST CAMBRIDGE MA 02141 -1207 BELLEAIR FL 33756 -1403 CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1404 ANGO, RICHARD BOERNER, SUSANA B M M M HOMECARE LLC 54 SOMERSET ST 112 S LAUBER WAY 5801 ULMERTON RD STE 200 CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1543 TAMPA FL 33609 -2615 CLEARWATER FL 33760 -3951 M M M HOMECARE LLC M M M HOMECARE LLC M M M HOMECARE LLC 5801 ULMERTON RD STE 200 5801 ULMERTON RD STE 200 5801 ULMERTON RD STE 200 CLEARWATER FL 33760 -3951 CLEARWATER FL 33760 -3951 CLEARWATER FL 33760 -3951 MIRANDA, ALPHONSE SMITH, IRENE V LA QUALE, GERARDO 2710 HIBISCUS DR W PO BOX 113 LA QUALE, AMELIA P BELLEAIR BEACH FL 33786 -3528 WILTON NH 03086 -0113 594 MAIN ST EAST GREENWICH RI 02818 -3608 FOLEY, CATHERINE G LEWINSKI, WOJCIECH BAY ESPLANADE PROJECT LLC 661 POINSETTIA AVE APT 108 LEWINSKI, HANNA 305 CAMBRIDGE ST STE 3 CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1534 661 POINSETTIA AVE APT 306 CAMBRIDGE MA 02141 -1207 CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1537 1066363 ONTARIO LTD CHMELA, EVA E THOMPSON, MICHAEL S 152 CLARENDON ST CHMELA, WALTER F THOMPSON, MARIA SOUTHAMPTON ON NOH 21-0 10 COURTWOOD PL 5 DRYLAND RD BOROUGH GREEN TORONTO ON M2K 1Z9 SEVEN OAKS KENT TN15 9SG M M M HOMECARE LLC RHOADS, JEFFREY L THE BAY ESPLANADE PROJECT LLC 5801 ULMERTON RD STE 200 PO BOX 861 305 CAMBRIDGE ST STE 3 CLEARWATER FL 33760 -3951 DUNEDIN FL 34697 -0861 CAMBRIDGE MA 02141 -1207 LETOURNEAU, WILLIAM T GTE FLORIDA INCORPORATED ROZENITS, FRED HIRSCH, DEBORA A C/O PROPERTY TAX SECTION ROZENITS, ANNA 661 POINSETTIA AVE APT 305 PO BOX 152206 31 ISLAND WAY APT 1002 CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1536 IRVING TX 75015 -2206 CLEARWATER FL 33767 -2207 PETER PAN DEVELOPMENTS LLC DE NUNZIO GROUP LLC BAYESPLANADE.COM LLC 5210 WEBB RD 305 CAMBRIDGE ST STE 3 627 BAY ESPLANADE TAMPA FL 33615 -4518 CAMBRIDGE MA 02141 -1207 CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1617 SEA SIDE ON ESPLANADE LLC NORTH CLEARWATER BEACH DEVELOPMENT BAYESPLANADE.COM LLC 345 HAMDEN DR PO BOX 4189 627 BAY ESPLANDE CLEARWATER FL 33767 -2450 CLEARWATER FL 33758 -4189 CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1617 BAYESPLANADE.COM LLC SEA SIDE ON ESPLANADE LLC THURMOND, CAROL HESS LIVING TRUST 627 BAY ESPLANADE 345 HAMDEN DR THURMOND, CAROL HESS THE CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1617 CLEARWATER FL 33767 -2450 829 OLEANDER DR AIKEN SC 29801 -5165 DEAN REAL ESTATE INV INC SURF & SAND FLORIDA LLC 647 BAY ESPLANADE 345 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1617 CLEARWATER FL 33767 -2450 SURF & SAND FLORIDA LLC KELLEY, PAUL 345 HAMDEN DR KELLEY, TRACEY CLEARWATER FL 33767 -2450 667 BAY ESPLANDE CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1550 ALBRECHT, YVETTE PENNOCK, ROBERT M II CHURCH FARM BARN - -- CHURCH LANE VAN ASDALE, MELODIE A SHURDINGTON 665 BAY ESPLANADE APT 3 CHELTENHAM GLOS GL51 4TQ CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1598 KELLEY, PAUL BAYESPLANADE.COM LLC KELLEY, TRACEY 627 BAY ESPLANADE 667 BAY ESPLANDE CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1617 CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1550 SURF & SAND FLORIDA LLC 345 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 -2450 SEA SIDE ON ESPLANADE LLC 345 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 -2450 PENNOCK, ROBERT M II VAN ASDALE, MELODIE A 665 BAY ESPLANADE APT 3 CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1598 OfIr", CITY OF CLEARWATER PiANVINc, & DEVELOPMENT DF7'ARTMLNT �v POST OITI('E. Box ! 748,. CLE" ATr.R, FLORIDA 33758-4748 M UNICIP4,L SEPv s BuRDINC, 10O SOUTH MYRTLE.A.VENUE, CLEAMATER, FLORIDA 33756 4TER,,,lot, TELEPHONE (727) 5624567 FAX (727) %24865 April 16, 2013 RE: NOTICE OF FILING AN APPLICATION FOR FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AT 650 BAY ESPLANADE (FLS2013- 02006); OWNED BY: BAY ESPLANADE PROJECT LLC To Surrounding Property Owners: As a property owner within 500 feet of 650 BAY ESPLANADE, the City of Clearwater Planning and Development Department gives notice that an application has been submitted for Flexible Standard Development application to permit a 102 -room overnight accommodation use in the Tourist (T) District with a lot area of 41,232 square feet (0.95 acres), lot widths of 104 feet along Bay Esplanade (east); 289.98 feet along Bay Esplanade (south) and 182.06 feet along Poinsettia Avenue (west); a front (east) setback of 15 feet (to building); a front (south) setback of 15 feet (to building); a front (west) setback of 21 feet (to building); a side (north) setback of 5 feet (to balcony) and 10 feet (to building); a building height of 65 feet (from Base Flood Elevation to flat roof); and 129 off - street parking spaces, pursuant to the Community Development Code Section 2 -802.M and the requirements of the Old Florida District of Beach by Design; and an increase in the maximum density through the allocation of 55 overnight accommodation units from the Hotel Density Reserve created pursuant to Beach by Design, as well as an increase in the percentage of palm trees to 100 percent where 75 percent is allowable, as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program, pursuant to the Community Development Code Section 3- 1202.G. On May 2, 2013, the Development Review Committee (composed of the City's professional staff) will review and determine whether the application demonstates compliance with the City's Community Development Code. Following that review and determination, the Planning Director will issue a Development Order approving, approving with conditions, or denying the application. The earliest date that the City will make a decision on the application will be May 2, 2013. The City encourages you to participate in the review of this application. You may contact me at 562- 4567x2502 or via email at Kevin .Nurnberger @myclearwater.com for further information, visit our office to review the files and /or submit written comments to be considered in the City review of the application. Please be advised that the applicant may submit additional or new information regarding this case which you may review during regular business hours. However, no further notice will be provided to you should the application be amended. An appeal of the decision of the Planning Director may be initiated by the applicant or property owners within the required notice area who present competent substantial evidence at, or prior to, the Development Review Committee meeting on May 2, 2013. An appeal must be filed, including an appeal fee, with the City Clerks Office within seven days of the issuance of the Development Order. Thank you for your interest in the City of Clearwater's development review process. You may access the Planning and Development Department through the City's website: www.myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, 4/16/2013 "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT A:NTD AFFiiwATIVE AcnoN.EMPLOYER" Letter_OI Notlft a ion CITY OF CLEARWATER. PLkNINI VG- & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT POST Orrice Box 4748, CuARWATER, FLoRiDA 33758-4748 -icE G -R, FLomA 33756 Mu mum. SERv s BwwiN 100 Sou..,i'H Mmu AvENUE, CuARwATE TELEPHoNt (727) 562-4567 FAX. (727) 5624865 Kevin Numberger Planner III 4/16/2013 Lette ..Of.NofifiOatlon "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT ND -AffiRmAm Ac HON EMPLOYER" VICINITY MAP s_ NI x[nm SITE " `"•n LEGAL DESCRIPTION emau (was rxw[[ i twru�,¢xo.�u�o�w] urvais[m"amia,DE n�cw�[. was mx ,.wm >o ]¢'t to ros Pd6�] rtam� xo. rrI ZT, xpav x0. R„¢ a. a' m[ neat scams m rwnxns caxn. PROJECTTEAM a.uw A aann. • a auo,i.w. K Irhk In]I ]1auM. +.eNpmm am � Rrmrev, xe toa R„xexsawx ar Wrmia. v]re W3 awry Bowl PSncaarbwaast Insk lassl m -tom, urwp.ereempmn R,>.eunlOa,p. LLC atzs xm. Rue. nn TM1a]. tt axeu IRak fn71 zss+xas.O.Rx'sOm� :Iowa, irtkip Iwn.e 17�1 IRRk M7)saa -aam n coomnarac IRnk 1]n, ro,am, ALL ELEVATIONS REFER TO NAVD 88 DATUM UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED CONSTRUCTION PLAN FOR: DeNunzio Hotel SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA Prepared For: Bay Esplenade Project, LLC 305 CAMBRIDGE ST, SUITE 3 CAMBRIDGE, MA 02141 Ph. (617) 945 -2555 DJD@TheDeNunz!oGroup.com Prepared By: MMMM L M A ■ ■M■ ■ ■M■ Landon, Moree & Associates, Inc. Civil 8 Environmental Engineers - Planners - Surveyors 31633 U.s. 19 NORTH PALM HARSOR MCMDA UC PDOxNx (131)7asaGl4 Fax (T3T)T3T M, TN Pnaex 1d0D3a3• M Y1W111131AENGR.1'ON ER WORE �iw.�.�si.FOw,wCONOSSF"�pN� � �u mrwn --.E sx]i.�r::wM, n�o�v raxrcomm ertrtrouwfx RCRatNOSUxmi<ei • ri or<wk-t�aaw�.m�im ].E Oxnff Daww ",aR,uto oexiar.cRrmoE DarROxror errors aeonewewomc RROwce.axE % PLAN INDEX 1. COVER SHEET 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS 3. SITE PLAN 0. PAVING, GRADING, DRAINAGE 8 UTILITY PLAN S. DETAILS S CONSTRUCTION NOTES 8. DETAILS f SITE DATA 1 PARGELwa 1azalsaaTSxuas3 ]0010, laysrfs]sa3swsamlua f srnnvxTSSNwaf fa +srzgf3rsaTSerovrouo a fsDwf 3I61TSSNS3pf 30 sw]f.Knxx[ �-(MKR�oeea3a oRwa nE �,rvx.rro :.,zu av m+saw,:si rRaRaamr..R:��. rnaROSEOkexom '05�emRr: �. RRaROaeu ar •m.F are euxvwo se]e.us rRan]- ts.soa. tv, r�wR.,v Ems"" cowwmoN Sr laa%1 ar venuin U "arEn�vSF arrowl ]orK aReR sv.�:n.m ff I,m�l PROPOSED CONDITIONS (GROUND i R)l xepaxsr (]a3Y, PMIUNQ REOUIREMR EN OtRimWS.,asP "CEs vROVm[D: ,z] �INakuDNCawc saux:sr r�aaxa� REVISIONS FEB 0 1 2013 GRAPHIC SCALE (r�l N i €" ITI I I�s I , I , I � I I I 11 I I I Kal 5 1, I I I I I ' I a�mE e� f 2), t l I ► � �ly STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION NOTES i.e . us.°. a ..... aw .o.ewa.o-"".d.d.+� •aim e. „x... ,u, m� em a w. w _ _ a urow..M�r n. m.+. ,,.ri.r me w e..e,er .luYO w muurrle,. reo-en .un w LOT 3 EI I I swwoo'E 11 I ,1 «x LOT 2 °'I`" qO PARCEL P "x Is— ;II U I� ,u ,II , It it ,u 9a Iao LOT 1 ®I PARCEL I I c ill I - 1;1 I /' W � 1 � i r� I� BLOCK 82 LOT 10 "XlY'' ax LOT 11 Sig PARCEL 3 vaCV. >aII (M.�a�B LOT 13 PARCEL 5 LOT 12 "rc PARCEL 4 W% - INSTALLING A ,,i.q< All ^ARRIC SI aT'FENCE =r ..r I 1 1 1 v �j 11 '1 II �Z 11 III �T yo 11 1" 1 °yi fw l' INSTALLING A Fl TFR FABRI e' LT FENCE w 1 i8 un I� 1 PARCEL I b LOT 8 ° BLOCK 77 Irt tyRCVIr) I I �5 ►�� Et FEB 01 2013 PLANNING NING u DEVEL.OPMENT DEPT C:rRFV.'AfER ti�tt se E: €��i, ? ✓'::_� it qtr i(�IE�llEEil16E1s' 11/, EXISTING CONDITIONS II'II�I J J x In o a` NC ¢ �� v�o 3 � yam Z a U, Lu o� WR Cal owns C::Cas� H 2 E T OF 6 LEGEND 0 _ � �LQfSiu V - <R MtORNIi • -OUR ,U[I p - RYYNp[ • -PoYp W[ a - raawm .Ym YaR m- lea)Ym Y.m rua - snlNtt SlfR YNMgF - ,+Taal fRYA ®_,mlEm —1 - - - - -U. YOI LLa VtRUNn YM THE FIVE PALMS MOTEL, - .c slaw Y.p vE rtR uwn Yv A CONDOMINIUM -uc.um ua aY Unm Yrn CONDO P.B. 73, PGS. 69 & 70 • -vua w 1 i8 un I� 1 PARCEL I b LOT 8 ° BLOCK 77 Irt tyRCVIr) I I �5 ►�� Et FEB 01 2013 PLANNING NING u DEVEL.OPMENT DEPT C:rRFV.'AfER ti�tt se E: €��i, ? ✓'::_� it qtr i(�IE�llEEil16E1s' 11/, EXISTING CONDITIONS II'II�I J J x In o a` NC ¢ �� v�o 3 � yam Z a U, Lu o� WR Cal owns C::Cas� H 2 E T OF 6 GRAPHIC SCALE IT ,gin Pm'n I N P I 1 I I J�4` w / I iII I ®v f °ro wa 1 I� I, I I FEB 0 1 2013 PLANINNG & QEVELOPMEPd i DEPT H SITE PLAN E oF3 I auao. I I I 1� ' II I . I ) I •fR1,0r I 111 1, tlY O ---�r I} aII , I p uwscmc amps Ai" 1 PARCEL I 0 Q Ne i Z 1 tl I mswcr tp aanxc 41 I! man Pan rP°a ini CONGA° — _ _ !1 I // LOT 8 BLOCK 77 = llml p L a& •! LEGEND 0 V { �# I I - �� _ ,.�� .. .....:........, — _____ _--�_— ° -cae tv rt¢six - cur�na �� = LL V - OUIiR HIAUn - [ NP W i UJ LOT 3 LOT 10 I 7 i =ttuta aml - uu,um urta vux In = jf I I I I I - vaouvr 2wA wanE e- (—T) I ➢4[� smxY rnr I I g' I ➢1¢[ naY CBS I t I �wrnr. I i { I 11 1'I I�nnc v¢cstu e - t6ua aaslu ®- uts �trta Itl Mff Sla, C$5 I , � Y�0 � 11 mater � -YAl[q YNK u -n -oz - I - 1 ! - U:G Y—IIIWY 5[aA IlE - swlw, saa ue nx a Wn Ilrr uwawPC exrwYaxuaa area a a a ; THE FIVE PALMS MOTEL, �c - us SIM sc,a w Pla i a ; o A CONDOMINIUM — as arum Wv - ue..tra u�em arum nn O Q I CONDO P.B. 73, PGS. 69 & 70 w / I iII I ®v f °ro wa 1 I� I, I I FEB 0 1 2013 PLANINNG & QEVELOPMEPd i DEPT H SITE PLAN E oF3 I auao. I I I 1� ' II I . I ) I •fR1,0r I 111 1, tlY O ---�r I} aII , I p uwscmc amps Ai" 1 PARCEL I 0 Q Ne i Z 1 tl I mswcr tp aanxc 41 I! man Pan rP°a ini CONGA° — _ _ !1 I // LOT 8 BLOCK 77 = llml p L a& •! 0 { �# I I - �� _ ,.�� .. .....:........, — _____ _--�_— mfg = LL v[x UJ 7 In w / I iII I ®v f °ro wa 1 I� I, I I FEB 0 1 2013 PLANINNG & QEVELOPMEPd i DEPT H SITE PLAN E oF3 GRAPHIC SCALE .tee -m Ia N LEGEND PA _ Nfl I .CT s _OT to I �_ A. Y w 5W 191 A fsWY CUe I.I nP, rsa M4 I' @y� I'll .�• ®- �1¢vots,4 II� � ........ b-,j — — — _ UG SNYINIY 4fA I•F IYR uN1Y W➢ �"-} 3 `-'� IYY 1eA.a uG Slad YIEn u( 8 d THE °N. lr,( It LI�TGL - -- uG S10W 4iOl W(Ip1ubM1YW _ I vd .ru•m - — o. nv...•DOw no b . A. ;1'Ilrif1. rN;M -- �-- u�I.. -.-- w,°� I i I rw°rtw s 'y •° rl'u`s ,m a,rswo• (,j \DO P.E. 73, POS. Fig h: 70 ww lc.'AO�9Or w,w �• �,� f I I « �4, .. _ I - � Ip�1�'�[�:� m� ,�°'�' g 'y d �{ '�� ' .� _ •o,Aw ,r.w� nr••i• b I I I � -, `4 `l'O � `� '�C i b" ® � I ' -., I I• `1 � ��rAAr II III,dl,1' � � .®"1P.c.G - '1"'*nW - ii O � 1 1•ee 9�`�� titi�e ly.( `�' —�` .hp ¢ttv¢iNlamleWUfl a.n �' :.� �VOaAM nv�pllr � � � N �� .i 7� I�l .el�i s . w,a ®r. AwA•[ M . auv uexo� � - �1[ � ws _w tlY `° + V - '- I I i it •n. • v r alv i y � � - - _ ��' � '.II 1 1 � = J �,1 1Is� I PARfEL I = 0 Va N 1 �•o ip rA« .- ra°ro•�°xo - vlP la I41 LOT d W •O- co 1I F, II I I nLU ^ , �• OQ S"s,. s.x _ rr °. rl �yY ', ., .'I `LiLOC< 77' a� it m� -frF — - T \� af! r.��j�.,1 �(f� w N bb s �' Liz m oexnc snar ) II w, ./ /% I�ic��- + v - --�,�I • — 1 �a xa _ 1p — — — Yr� -Ywva tl 'll I.II' ��m �9 /� �•� —i —� —_ -- �1 �� 1 'r 4� FEB 0 2013 „� �\ _ — — i ••� w • °"• Wtt PL; IMI iNG a DEVEI OPPAENT DEFT # [ff riT'! GE -cNiV.�ACtF i w,l - -.= -,� - -- - - -f ��/ \'\ L�1 • b ' stw0 r!°i SttoM o]xpnees wvAx¢ qn¢ 6 R'aXm. Imdw¢ �~ �� I ►i � r� w� tae .� m� m-..w • � n � �I iii 3. I/ w .ass I I :M. as a e aPo� m ¢ w a� 4 ME I .ji SECT an - ••+•,/T••°'o smnuc wu. a oawm .v ova Fnax<m un �Arowx .nccr�l[c, ,o .wn mwic,s •m ..xo m.x pus ./ BEcn @& ALL ELEVATIONS REFER TO RAVD B8 DATUY URLE" OTHERWIDE ROTED V YYWG pt3 E w nAnoa,orm+o•+n,e wA,unaw.Ae,uwA,en sFavlrr_ E i� DRAINAGE & PAVING, GRADING I�,.wlw AR��Y w GE UTILITY PLAN — i OF 6 -~--~ ''----'--~----'--'------ �x�=�=�=�-----~'----'--- '--''-----'-------~~~ ��----_~�'-_�'-----_'----�' -~-'''-'------- '-----'---- ^------`---`---`--`-��-- -'--~---~---'----- ---'------- -'----'-------- ^`----------^� -'-----------'--'^ �====,===p====�=� ------`---~- ' '-- '--~------'---- '----'--'~--'---~-'--- = ~----^----'''-----~--~ �WE� AVE & IIUIX 1-�� -----'''--''- .�--�-'-.--- '---------'--'- '--------- -~'--'--'-'--'----'`- n=� --------------'-- STREET AND OF TYPICAL DOUBLE ACCESSIBLE-P-ARKING STOLL � --------r =� SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE COVER L= J-17JF L CONCRETE SWALE DETAIL VALLEY GU TTER QQM [��- DETAILS & CC �L - Mil F� � W Widikimmm PLANNING & DOVEVOPMENT DEFT CITY OF CI-1'7ARVvXriFR .TYPICAL SIDEWALK CONSTRU�V?H RAMP DETAIL TYPICAL DOUBLE ACCESSIBLE-P-ARKING STOLL � --------r =� SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE COVER L= J-17JF L CONCRETE SWALE DETAIL VALLEY GU TTER QQM [��- DETAILS & CC �L - Mil F� � W Widikimmm PLANNING & DOVEVOPMENT DEFT CITY OF CI-1'7ARVvXriFR ES � � - |� �ca Y » = x c �� ~~ OF 6 b Tw OH DIV 00 o x 0 In RW SETTINQ PVC PIPE��L,�,E�TRAINING TYPICAL METEF RACKFLOW PRFVENTERS —7 w 76� CL Z! 2' PAR§kL TYPICA� RCClElPlUND WAT61�R MITER SET S 3� 'k MODELS TYPICAL COMPOUND WATER METER SET 45'ajo�k�;,4, 6" M.9&LL-5 CHLORINATION TAP 2 < z w ra -H -w u � L) V) .1 Lu =7 ag Im POND UNDERDRAIN DETAIL U B 2013 no an on 'N! N QRIFIQE DEIAIL- 5EC-nQN B—B F.D.O.T. INDE;232 TYPE D 'MODIFIED' OUTFALL STRUCTURE *2 DETAILS s E I 1 -- - E T b RE(o% JUN 13 2013 c Response to Comments FLS2013 -02006 -- 650 BAY ESPLANADE Bay Esplanade Project LLC �s C of O Condition - Parks 02/28/2013 - The project's Developer must comply with the terms of the Public & Rec Art Ordinance and install artwork valued at no less than 1 % of the project's aggregate job value, or donate 0.75% of the project's AJV to the City's Public Art Fund, prior to the issuance of a CO. Acknowledged. Engineering Review Prior to Building Permit: 1. As per Section 3- 1907B, Sidewalks /Bicycle paths and City Construction Standard Index No. 109 for Sidewalks, Applicant shall bring all sub - standard sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project up to standard, including A.D.A. standards (per FDOT Index #304 FY 2012/2013). Sidewalk ramps shall be constructed at the southeast and southwest corners of the sidewalk. Acknowledged. 2. If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site - specific water capacity and pressure requirements and /or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. Acknowledged. 3. As per Clearwater Code of Ordinances, Article IX., Reclaimed Water System, Section 32.376, Use of potable water for irrigation is prohibited, no person shall use potable water for irrigation through a new or existing lawn meter on property where reclaimed water distribution facilities are available. Reclaimed water is available in the right of way for Poinsettia Avenue and Bay Esplanade. The irrigation plans note the use of the existing V reclaimed water meter for the landscape irrigation. General Note: 1. Sheets 1 -2, 5 -6, LA1 -LA2 and IR2 were not reviewed. The additional details provided in the plan set may have been necessary for other departmental reviews to provide flexible development approval. Construction details shall be reviewed more thoroughly prior to receipt of the building permit. Acknowledged. 2. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review. Additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Acknowledged. Environmental Review General Note(s) 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Acknowledged. 2. Prior to issuance of building permit, provide stormwater vault specifications showing the vault provides water quality benefits and provide a vault maintenance schedule that has been signed and accepted by the owner. Acknowledged. 3. Prior to issuance of building permit, please provide a sedimentation and erosion control plan for the site. Acknowledged. See sheet 2 of the Engineering plans. Fire Review 1) Provide Fire Flow Calculations / Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. Calculations / Water Study ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT Fire flow calculations have been ordered. Results and water study to be provided prior to issuance of building permit. 2) Automatic Class I wet standpipe w/ fire pump providing 100 psi at roof.. Fire Pump to be located above Base Flood Elevation The system shall be designed so as not to incorporate Pressure Regulating Devices (PRD). The system must be designed as a zoned system. This provides a safe operating condition for firefighters that will use the system. If the design of the system requires PRDS they will be required to be Elkhart Adjustable devices. ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO D.O. Standpipe locations to be provided during permitting process. 3) FDC is required, and shall be a minimum of 15 feet from building and shall have a fire hydrant within 40 feet. ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO D.O. See sheet 4 of the Engineering plans for FDC locations. 6/2/2013 3 DRC Comments 4) Fire Department Connections shall be identified by a sign that states No Parking, Fire Department Connection and shall be designed in accordance with Florida Department of Transportation standards for information signage and be maintained with a clearance of 71/2 feet in front of and to the sides of appliance as per Florida Fire Prevention Code 2010 edition. Please acknowledge intent to comply ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO D.O. See revised Sheet 4 of the Engineering plans for FDC location and "No Parking Fire Department Connection" sign. 5) A fire sprinkler system in accordance with NFPA 13 2007 edition is required. ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO D.O. Acknowledged. 6) Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, they shall be installed, completed, and in service prior to construction as per NFPA 241. All underground fire lines and hydrants must be installed by a contractor with a class 1,11 or V license. ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO D.O. Acknowledged. 7) Must Comply with Ordinance No. 7617 06 Radio System Regulations for buildings, install 911 Radio Repeater Antenna Booster System ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO D.O. At time of construction (completion of floors and outer walls) the structure will be tested and must meet the minimum requirement of Negative 95 BDM. If this requirement is met, the radio system will not be required. If we do not meet the requirement an RF engineer will be consulted and the required radio system installed. 8) A Knox Box will be required, form may be obtained from the Division of Fire Prevention Services by calling (727) 562 -4327 extension 3062 ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO D.O. No gate is proposed, main entrances to be open and will not require a knox box. 9) Provide clarity on height of this structure this is close to being a High Rise road grade unclear 3.3.27.6 High -Rise Building. A building where the floor of an occupiable story is greater than 75 ft (23 m) above the lowest level of fire department vehicle access. [5000, 2009] Sheet 3 of 8 under the Flexible Standard Development Application Building Height is proposed at 65 feet above BFE provide clarity ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO D.O. Highest occupiable floor is 58' -2" above adjacent grade. < 75 F. Revised plans were submitted at DRC Acknowledged. 10) Provide details to show if the parking garage will be open or closed meeting the requirements of NFPA 88 A, 2007 edition Standard for Parking Structures ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO D.O. Parking garage is to be closed and will meet the requirements of NFPA 88A Standard for Parking Structures 2007 Edition. 11) Note: This is a D.R.C.approval only. Other issues may develop and will be addressed at building permit stage Such as separate permits for fire alarm, fire underground, fire sprinkler, fire pump. Plan shows a separation between existing building and new structure, must provide adequate fire separation to meet building and fire codes for openings. Design Professional will need to address this condition ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO D.O. Acknowledged. Land Resource Review DRC is a prerequisite and additional comments may apply at building permit time such as details on tree preservation. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, prior to issuance of a building permit any and all performance based erosion and sedimentation control measures must be approved by Environmental and or Stormwater Engineering, be installed properly, and inspected. Acknowledged. Parks and Recreation 4/19/13 - Site data table has been corrected. Open Space /recreation impact fees are due prior Review to the issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable), whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Debbie Reid at 727 -562- 4818 to calculate the assessment. Acknowledged. 2/26/13 -Site data table needs to reflect what was previously on the property as well as the proposed number and types of units (residential or hotel/motel). At that time it can be determined if the Parks and Recreation Impact fee will be due on this project. Planning Review Planning Review 1. Sheet A- 001 -006 - third floor plan shows a front setback of 21 foot rather than 23 feet. Revise. Revised plans were submitted at DRC. 6/2/2013 4 DRC—Comments 2. The tiki bar structure is located within the required 16 foot stepback (identified as step back two). No structure shall be located within the stepback. The tiki bar needs to removed or relocated. Staff also has concerns regarding the location of the tiki bar and recommends that if not removed it shall be located along the south side of the building due to concerns over live music and hours of operation on adjacent property owners. Show on revised site plan and building elevations drawings; Tiki Bar removed, Revised plans were submitted at DR . 3. The balconies on the front (west) building facade shall be reduced to 24 inches in width or the applicant will need to request a five foot setback reduction which will result in a requires ten foot stepback. Show all balconies on site plan ;; Western balconies were reduced to 24" / Revised plans were submitted at DRC. t/ 4. Beach by Design requires an aesthetically inviting an easily identified entrance. The submitted site plan shows a pronounced stairway leading to the primary entrance. The materials of the stairway are to be constructed pavers patterned or distressed which distinguished it from other suburban concrete sidewalks. It shall be a condition of approval that the stairway be constructed of pavers patterned or distressed. Prior to any building permit, the stairway on the site plan shall be shown to be constructed of pavers patterned or distressed as required in Beach by Design; A differentiating paver pattern is proposed for the primary building entrance. Revised plans were submitted at DRC. 5. The submitted site plan indicates that the proposed sidewalks will be of concrete materials. Sidewalks are to be constructed of pavers patterned or distressed which distinguish it from other suburban concrete sidewalks. It shall be a condition of approval that the sidewalk be constructed of pavers patterned or distressed. That prior to any building permit, the sidewalks on the site plan shall be shown to be constructed of pavers patterned or distressed as required in Beach by Design; See Sheet 3 of the Engineering plans for sidewalk pave notes. 6. Show a 5 foot unobstructed path along the north side of the building as required in Old Florida District for reduced setbacks; and 5 ft. unobstructed path is provided along the north of the building. The sidewalk and the ornamental peanut. The ornamental peanut is a non -viney ground cover that is approximately 3 "-4" in height, much like sod, but will grow better in the shade conditions of the north side of the building. See Sheet 3 of the Engineering plans and Sheet LA1. A site plan and building elevation plan shall be submitted that shows required changes to building at DRC. Revised plans were submitted at DRC. Planning Review Conditions of Approval: 1. That approval of this Flexible Standard Development case is subject to the approval of a Development Agreement with the City (Case DVA2013 -02001); 2. That the development proposal shall be granted a two-year Development Order effective from the date the Development Order is issued by the Community Development Coordinator, 3. That prior to the issuance of any building permit, parcels 05/29/15/54756/082 /0010; 05/29/15/54756/082 /0020; 05/29/15/54756/082 /0110; 05/29/15/54756/082 /0120, and 05/29/15/54756/082 /0130 shall be tied together under a Unity of Title; 4. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the elevations approved by the Development Review Committee; 5. That prior to any building permits, the site plan shall be revised to show the stairway leading towards the primary entrance of the hotel to be constructed of pavers patterned or distressed as required in Beach by Design; 6. The balconies on the front (west) building facade shall be reduced to 24 inches in width or the applicant will need to request a five foot setback reduction which will result in a requires ten foot stepback; 7. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, the sidewalks on the site plan shall be shown and noted to be constructed of pavers patterned or distressed as required in Beach by Design; 8. That any future attached or freestanding signage must be monument -style meeting Code requirements and be designed to match exterior materials and color of the building. Any proposed signage for the hotel shall be reviewed and approved by Staff through a separate sign permit; 9. That all landscaping plants and trees shall be Florida Grade #1 plant material with an automatic irrigation system; 10. That the prior to the issuance of any building permit, a public right -of -way permit shall be obtained for any work in the public right -of -way; 11. That the books and records pertaining to use of each hotel room be open for inspection by authorized representatives of the City, upon reasonable notice, in order to confirm compliance with the Hotel Density Reserve criteria of Beach by Design as allowed by general law; 12. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a hurricane evacuation plan for the hotel be submitted and approved by the City for all Guests; 13. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, the location and visibility of electric equipment (electric panels, boxes and meters) be reviewed and, if located exterior to the building where visible from any street frontage, be painted the same color as the portion of the building to which such features are attached; 14. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, any applicable Public Art and Design Impact Fee be paid; 15. That prior to the issuance of any building permits all Parks and Recreation fees be paid; 16. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, all requirements of General Engineering, Stormwater Engineering, and Traffic Engineering shall be addressed; 17. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, all comments from the Fire Department shall be addressed;That prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, all utilities, including individual distribution lines serving this development within the right -0f -way along Poinsettia Avenue and Bay Esplanade, as applicable, must be installed underground unless undergrounding is not practicable; Planning conditions of permit are acknowledged and agreed to. Planning Review 19. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, the Fire Department may require the provision of a Water Study performed by a Fire Protection Engineer in order to ensure that an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of the project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and /or fire pump. If a fire pump is required, then the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity Acknowledged. Solid Waste Review Restricted to a 4cy Dumpster on wheels and housing Dumpster inside will require room to be set up with fire suppression equipment. Acknowledged. Stormwater Review Prior to Building Permit: 1. The final discharge point of the vault shall be located at the east side of the site to replicate the existing drainage pattern from west to east. Current design does not match the historical flow pattern. Stormwater design and final discharge to be coordinated with staff prior to building permit Prior to Certificate of Occupancy: 1. A copy of the approved SWFWMD permit shall be provided. Acknowledged. 6/2/2013 7 DRC_Comments A . 2. Prior to requesting for final Stormwater inspection, contractor to submit a signed and sealed as -built certifying by the engineer of record that the stormwater system was built per design and meet all regulations. Acknowledged. General Comments: 1. All resubmittals shall be accompanied with a response letter addressing how each department condition has been met. Enclosed. 2. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Acknowledged. Traffic Eng Review Prior to a Development Order: On both the civil site plan and landscape plan , the 20'x 20' sight visibility triangles shall be drawn at the property lines per City's Community Development Code, Section 3 -904 (see figure). There shall be no objects in the sight triangle which do not meet the City's acceptable vertical height criteria at a level between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade. For example the vertical height of a wall or decorative fence inside the sight visibility triangle shall be only 30" high or less. See revised Sheet 3 of the Engineering plans and Sheet LA1 for site visibility triangles. 4552487v1 PIP lei E-� tm be!!n RECEIVED MAY 17 2013 f= OF CUAMWM OUItSU N&h a SoLlh EWM. 2013,0515 A4)(F7 I ►� °- • e iii��s_is� e e • ire' 7 �.�_ • •` Olt .ee• •� y 10000,OI -n r �i�� 1 9 %V 14 R0Q"NK'WtV -.m CCwMAM m I NO IN p olef C-1 1 � ELEVATION c 0 eiosc .c DEN 2.02 Elevat,c- 2012 02.0' A-002 LU ci Uj CL � u w CO LL LL. Z c 0 eiosc .c DEN 2.02 Elevat,c- 2012 02.0' A-002 2:00 PM Case number: FLS2013 -02006 -- 650 BAY ESPLANADE Owner(s): Bay Esplanade Project Llc 305 Cambridge St Ste 3 Cambridge, MA 02141 -1207 PHONE: No phone, Fax: No fax, Email: No email Applicant: Bay Esplanade Project Llc 305 Cambridge St Ste 3 Cambridge, MA 02141 -1207 PHONE: (617) 945 -2555, Fax: No fax, Email: Djd @thedenunziogroup.Com Representative: Randy Austin Landon, Moree & Associates 31622 Us19N Palm Harbor, FL 34684 PHONE: (727) 789 -5010, Fax: No fax, Email: Austin @lmaengr.Com Location: The five subject parcels (0.95 ares) are located on the northeast corner of the Poinsettia Avenue and Bay Esplanade intersection. Atlas Page: 258A Zoning District: Tourist Request: Flexible Standard Development application to permit a 102 -room overnight accommodation use in the Tourist (T) District with a lot area of 41,232 square feet (0.95 acres), lot widths of 104 feet along Bay Esplanade (east); 289.98 feet along Bay Esplanade (south) and 182.06 feet along Poinsettia Avenue (west); a front (east) setback of 13.1 feet (to building); front (south) setback of 15 feet (to building); front (west) setbacks of 18 feet (to balconies) and 23 feet (to building); a side (north) setback of eight feet (to balconies) and ten feet (to building); a building height of 75 feet (from Base Flood Elevation to mid -point of decorative roof structure); 131 off - street parking spaces; and a request for a two -year Development Order, pursuant to the Community Development Code Section 2- 802.M, Section 4- 303 and the requirements of the Old Florida District of Beach by Design; and an increase in the maximum density through the allocation of 55 overnight accommodation units from the Hotel Density Reserve created pursuant to Beach by Design, as well as an increase in the percentage of palm trees to 100 percent where 75 percent is allowable, as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program, pursuant to the Community Development Code Section 3- 1202.G. Proposed Use: Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhood Coalition Association(s): Clearwater Beach Association Presenter: Kevin Nurnberger, Planner III 6/6/2013 45 DRC_ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATNE ACTION EMPLOYER" Workflow: . Review Name Task Status Status Date Last Name Determination of Completeness Complete 02/06/2013 Nurnberger Route to Meeting Ready for DRC 04/11/2013 Nurnberger Development Review Committee Return to DRC 04/11/2013 Nurnberger Traffic Eng Review Comments 04/12/2013 Elbo Fire Review Comments 04/15/2013 Keller Engineering Review Comments 04/19/2013 Shannon Parks and Rec Review Comments Site data table has been corrected - please see conditions. 04/19/2013 Reid Art Review Comments 04/22/2013 Hubbard Due to the valuation of this project at $8,000,000, the Public Art and Design Program fee will be due and payable on this project prior to the issuance of a Building Construction Permit. This fee may be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Christopher Hubbard at (727) 562 -4837 to discuss the fee assessment. Stormwater Review Comments 04/22/2013 Sides Solid Waste Review Good to go. Comments 04/22/2013 Pryor Environmental Review Comments 04/23/2013 Josuns Land Resource Review No Comments 05/28/2013 Crandall 6/6/2013 46 DRC ActionAgenda "EQUAL. EMPLOYMENT AND .AEFLRMATjw AMON EMPLOYER" The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: C of O Condition - Parks 02/28/2013 - The project's Developer must comply with the terms of the Public & Rec Art Ordinance and install artwork valued at no less than 1 % of the project's aggregate job value, or donate 0.75% of the project's AJV to the City's Public Art Fund, prior to the issuance of a CO. Engineering Review Prior to Building Permit: 1. As per Section 3- 1907B, Sidewalks /Bicycle paths and City Construction Standard Index No. 109 for Sidewalks, Applicant shall bring all sub - standard sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project up to standard, including A.D.A. standards (per FDOT Index #304 FY 2012/2013). Sidewalk ramps shall be constructed at the southeast and southwest corners of the sidewalk. 2. If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site - specific water capacity and pressure requirements and /or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. 3. As per Clearwater Code of Ordinances, Article IX., Reclaimed Water System, Section 32.376, Use of potable water for irrigation is prohibited, no person shall use potable water for irrigation through a new or existing lawn meter on property where reclaimed water distribution facilities are available. Reclaimed water is available in the right of way for Poinsettia Avenue and Bay Esplanade. General Note: 1. Sheets 1 -2, 5 -6, LA1 -LA2 and IR2 were not reviewed. The additional details provided in the plan set may have been necessary for other departmental reviews to provide flexible development approval. Construction details shall be reviewed more thoroughly prior to receipt of the building permit. 2. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review. Additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental Review General Note(s) 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. 2. Prior to issuance of building permit, provide stormwater vault specifications showing the vault provides water quality benefits and provide a vault maintenance schedule that has been signed and accepted by the owner. 3. Prior to issuance of building permit, please provide a sedimentation and erosion control plan for the site. 6/6/2013 47 DRC ActionAgenda °EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND A,FFmmTjvE ACTION EMPLOYER° Fire Review 1) Provide Fire Flow Calculations / Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. Calculations / Water Study ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT 2) Automatic Class I wet standpipe w/ fire pump providing 100 psi at roof.. Fire Pump to be located above Base Flood Elevation The system shall be designed so as not to incorporate Pressure Regulating Devices (PRD). The system must be designed as a zoned system. This provides a safe operating condition for firefighters that will use the system. If the design of the system requires PRDS they will be required to be Elkhart Adjustable devices. ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO D.O. 3) FDC is required, and shall be a minimum of 15 feet from building and shall have a fire hydrant within 40 feet. ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO D.O. 4) Fire Department Connections shall be identified by a sign that states No Parking, Fire Department Connection and shall be designed in accordance with Florida Department of Transportation standards for information signage and be maintained with a clearance of 7 1/2 feet in front of and to the sides of appliance as per Florida Fire Prevention Code 2010 edition. Please acknowledge intent to comply ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO D.O. 5) A fire sprinkler system in accordance with NFPA 13 2007 edition is required. ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO D.O. 6) Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, they shall be installed, completed, and in service prior to construction as per NFPA 241. All underground fire lines and hydrants must be installed by a contractor with a class 1,11 or V license. ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO D.O. 7) Must Comply with Ordinance No. 7617 06 Radio System Regulations for buildings, install 911 Radio Repeater Antenna Booster System ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO D.O. 8) A Knox Box will be required, form may be obtained from the Division of Fire Prevention Services by calling (727) 562 -4327 extension 3062 ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO D.O. 9) Provide clarity on height of this structure this is close to being a High Rise road grade unclear 3.3.27.6" High -Rise Building. A building where the floor of an occupiable story is greater than 75 ft (23 m) above the lowest level of fire department vehicle access. [5000, 2009] Sheet 3 of 8 under the Flexible Standard Development Application Building Height is proposed at 65 feet above BFE provide clarity ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO D.O. 10) Provide details to show if the parking garage will be open or closed meeting the requirements of NFPA 88 A, 2007 edition Standard for Parking Structures ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO D.O. 11) Note: This is a D.R.C.approval only. Other issues may develop and will be addressed at building permit stage Such as separate permits for fire alarm, fire underground, fire sprinkler, fire pump. Plan shows a separation between existing building and new structure, must provide adequate fire separation to meet building and fire codes for openings. Design Professional will need to address this condition ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO D.O. 6/6/2013 48 DRC_ActionAgenda °EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFPmmTTvE ACTION EMPLOYER" Land Resource Review DRC is a prerequisite and additional comments may apply at building permit time such as details on tree preservation. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, prior to issuance of a building permit any and all performance based erosion and sedimentation control measures must be approved by Environmental and or Stormwater Engineering, be installed properly, and inspected. Parks and Recreation 4/19/13 - Site data table has been corrected. Open Space /recreation impact Review fees are due prior to the issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable), whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Debbie Reid at 727 - 562 -4818 to calculate the assessment. 2/26/13 - Site data table needs to reflect what was previously on the property as well as the proposed number and types of units (residential or hotel /motel). At that time it can be determined if the Parks and Recreation Impact fee will be due on this project. 6/6/2013 49 DRC_ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" Planning Review 6/6/2013 Planning Review 1. Sheet A- 001 -006 - third floor plan shows a front setback of 21 foot rather than 23 feet. Reviss' 2. The tiki bar ructure is located within the required 16 foot stepback (identified asAtep back two). No structure shall be located within the stepback. The tiki bafneeds to removed or relocated. Staff also has concerns regarding the loca ' n of the tiki bar and recommends that if not removed it shall be locate along the south side of the building due to concerns over live music and h6urs of operation on adjacent property owners. Show on revised site plan and building elevations drawings; 3. The balconies on the front (west) building facade shall be reduced to 24 inches in width or the applicant will need to request a five foot setback reduction which will result in a requires ten foot stepback. Show all balconies on site plan; 4. Beach by Design requires an aesthetically inviting an easily identified entrance. The submitted site plan shows a pronounced stairway leading to the primary entrance. The materials of the stairway are to be constructed pavers patterned or distressed which distinguished it from other suburban concrete sidewalks. It shall be a condition of approval that the stairway be constructed of pavers patterned or distressed. Prior to any building permit, the stairway on the site plan shall be shown to be constructed of pavers patterned or distressed as required in Beach by Design; 5. The submitted site plan indicates that the proposed sidewalks will be of concrete materials. Sidewalks are to be constructed of pavers patterned or distressed which distinguish it from other suburban concrete sidewalks. It shall be a condition of approval that the sidewalk be constructed of pavers patterned or distressed. That prior to any building permit, the sidewalks on the site plan shall be shown to be constructed of pavers patterned or distressed as required in Beach by Design; 6. Show a 5 foot unobstructed path along the north side of the building as required in Old Florida District for reduced setbacks; and 7. A site plan and building elevation plan shall be submitted that shows required changes to building at DRC. 50 DRC_ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE AMON EMPLOYER° Planning Review Conditions of Approval: 1. That approval of this Flexible Standard Development case is subject to the approval of a Development Agreement with the City (Case DVA2013- 02001); 2. That the development proposal shall be granted a two -year Development Order effective from the date the Development Order is issued by the Community Development Coordinator; 3. That prior to the issuance of any building permit, parcels 05/29/15/54756/082 /0010; 05/29/15/54756/082 /0020; 05/29/15/54756/082 /0110; 05/29/15/54756/082 /0120, and 05/29/15/54756/082 /0130 shall be tied together under a Unity of Title; 4. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the elevations approved by the Development Review Committee; 5. That prior to any building permits, the site plan shall be revised to show the stairway leading towards the primary entrance of the hotel to be constructed of pavers patterned or distressed as required in Beach by Design; 6. The balconies on the front (west) building facade shall be reduced to 24 inches in width or the applicant will need to request a five foot setback reduction which will result in a requires ten foot stepback; 7. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, the sidewalks on the site plan shall be shown and noted to be constructed of pavers patterned or distressed as required in Beach by Design; 8. That any future attached or freestanding signage must be monument -style meeting Code requirements and be designed to match exterior materials and color of the building. Any proposed signage for the hotel shall be reviewed and approved by Staff through a separate sign permit; 9. That all landscaping plants and trees shall be Florida Grade #1 plant material with an automatic irrigation system; 10. That the prior to the issuance of any building permit, a public right -of -way permit shall be obtained for any work in the public right -of -way; 0 That the books and records pertaining to use of each hotel room be open inspection by authorized representatives of the City, upon reasonable notice, in order to confirm compliance with the Hotel Density Reserve criteria of Beach by Design as allowed by general law; 12. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a hurricane evacuation plan for the hotel be submitted and approved by the City for all Guests; 13. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, the location and visibility of electric equipment (electric panels, boxes and meters) be reviewed and, if located exterior to the building where visible from any street frontage, be painted the same color as the portion of the building to which such features are attached; 14. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, any applicable Public Art and Design Impact Fee be paid; 15. That prior to the issuance of any building permits all Parks and Recreation fees be paid; 16. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, all requirements of General Engineering, Stormwater Engineering, and Traffic Engineering shall be addressed; 17. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, all comments from the Fire Department shall be addressed; 18. That prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, all utilities, including individual distribution lines serving this development within the right - of -way along Poinsettia Avenue and Bay Esplanade, as applicable, must be installed underground unless undergrounding is not practicable; 6/6/2013 51 DRC_ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE AcriON EMPLOYER" Planning Review 19. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, the Fire Department may require the provision of a Water Study performed by a Fire Protection Engineer in order to ensure that an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of the project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and /or fire pump. If a fire pump is required, then the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity Solid Waste Review Restricted to a 4cy Dumpster on wheels and housing Dumpster inside will require room to be set up with fire suppression equipment. Stormwater Review Prior to Builiding Permit: 1. The final discharge point of the vault shall be located at the east side of the site to replicate the existing drainage pattern from west to east. Current design does not match the historical flow pattern. Prior to Certificate of Occupancy: 1. A copy of the approved SWFWMD permit shall be provided. 2. Prior to requesting for final Stormwater inspection, contractor to submit a signed and sealed as -built certifying by the engineer of record that the stormwater system was built per design and meet all regulations. General Comments: 1. All resubmittals shall be accompanied with a response letter addressing how each department condition has been met. 2. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Traffic Eng Review Prior to a Development Order: 1. On both the civil site plan and landscape plan , the 20'x 20' sight visibility triangles shall be drawn at the property lines per City's Community Development Code, Section 3 -904 (see figure). There shall be no objects in the sight triangle which do not meet the City's acceptable vertical height criteria at a level between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade. For example the vertical height of a wall or decorative fence inside the sight visibility triangle shall be only 30" high or less. 6/6/2013 52 DRC_ActionAgenda °EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATNE ACTION EMPLOYER" behar peteranecz 22 May 2013 DEN12.02_ Denunzio Hotel 650 Bay Esplanade Clearwater, FL Kevin Nurnberger City of Clearwater Kevin, JjUVNWm tN3WLi m')NINNVU Eta 9 0 Nnr (3 3:)3'd For your use, below is the breakdown of the Facade areas. Would you like us to add this ARCHITECTURE I INTERIORS Behar t Rctcranev,: Inc. AA20,01'64 Clearwater( 103 Rogers Street. Clearwater, Florida 33756 !1 IT) 727.488.9490 (F} 727.478.3074 jordan@architecturebp.com Pensacola 113 W Strong Street. Pensacola, Florida 32501 1 IT] 850.377.1870 IF} 727.478.3074 istwan @architeecurebp.com EXTERIOR FINISHES AND OPENING PERCENTAGES STUDY NORTH ELEVATION: 19,130 SO FT SOUTH ELEVATION: 18;962 SOFT GLAZING 963 SO FT GLAZING 3,29.4 SO FT OPENINGS 1,352 SO FT OPENINGS 3,034 SO FT ARCHITECTURAL DETAIL 6,749 SO FT ARCHITECTURAL DETAIL 2,733 SOFT BALCONIES 2,552 SO FT BALCONIES 3,069 SO FT TOTAL: 11,616/19,130= 60% TOTAL: 12,130/18,962= 63% EAST ELEVATION: 8,946 SO FT WEST ELEVATION: 8,976 SO FT GLAZING 768 SO FT GLAZING 2,513 SO FT OPENINGS. 632 SO FT OPENINGS 181 SO FT ARCHITECTURAL DETAIL 3,214 SO FT ARCHITECTURAL DETAIL 2,024 SO FT BALCONIES 1,075 SO FT BALCONIES 1,297 SO FT TOTAL: 5,68918,946'= 63% TOTAL: 6,015/ 8,976 = 67% * OPENINGS ARE ARCHITECTURAL GARAGE SCREENING ARCHITECTURE I INTERIORS Behar t Rctcranev,: Inc. AA20,01'64 Clearwater( 103 Rogers Street. Clearwater, Florida 33756 !1 IT) 727.488.9490 (F} 727.478.3074 jordan@architecturebp.com Pensacola 113 W Strong Street. Pensacola, Florida 32501 1 IT] 850.377.1870 IF} 727.478.3074 istwan @architeecurebp.com 1 f�LU cl Uj •• LLJ Li- m al / �� •� LiY.GI'i•Tri wwi Gii4"ii .ii.. -. a:da :.�i:.Tiwsiii wiiii si G� ii J a. 2 NORTH ELEVATION �. U 4 C0 r w r S J w LL O a a v °CE N c z t S NU DEN12,02 uiGw mit - Brations —.m 2012.02.01 A-002 I Building Color 1 Building Color 2 Stone Color 3 BM OC -108 BM 2097 -50 sim to BM Pale Moon Hint of Mauve 2092.40 Texas Rose MATERIALS LEGEND Metal Roof Color 4 Railings: Color 5 Awnings: Color 6 BM 1613 Guinness Large Silent Night 3 ENLARGED BUILDING ELEVATION Thin stone veneer Accent, Color 4 Stucco Coping, Color 1 Stucco Trim, Color 2 Potential Signage locations. ii .a• :i A! .! 1 2 Prefinished metal railings, typical. Color 5. Stucco body Color 2 Stucco Trim, Color 3 Fabric Awning, Color 6. Building BaseColor 2., Color 3 !L U. S- :_J C Qt —� CV Nir O r;JI L -i1 -1 t EAST ELEVATION Ss- . --t a5 = 1 2 i OI N m -8 C d m M 0) 0 ' wuen auxwt uw: Waiter w D a. 1EN12.02 w 14 Elevations tau an 2012.02.01 A-003 r pWNNjjW„ uErA.RTMEf, CITY OF CLEARWATE': a Za o ICU ia— �`OEN12.02 North i South Elwa ws 2012 04.10 A:() Building Color 1 Bolding Colo! 2 Roof: Color 3 BM OC -108 SM 2097 -50 Rod Tile Pate Moon Hint of AAewe "A! r Rlkl s t EGEND 4 Ra rings: Color 4 ---- — — BI✓ 1613 _ Silent Night - - - - - — — Hed 14. Roof I - -- - - Stucco I— Cakx z _ Swao. C-okr z PLANNING DEPARTMEN- CITY OF CLEARWATE? Prafi -shed —.tal ratln2s. tyPr.FA. White Stu— oody Color 2 sluc:0. cow 1 Rod We roof St-- T—, Color 2 st— Cokx 1 Buadr,q Base aokx 2. West Elevation 4 EasiEWation m J CD N�N C m $� � � v Z W u O 2 u a,.`_ DEN12.02 East & West Ekvatom J20120410 A -008 I N P"NING DEPARyMENT a1YCFC 3H, I / 3 =� SITE PLAN r 1 'ErWWME,2 :OT 3 WT la �y� ��, lra.t• —.�.MM • ••• � 1LMI11f049.NiM y I R . �u ,...e......,.... n.a �..._.. re • Ii�'� � 111E RYE PAWS W 1[C, A CONOOmr." Vt tai i6 tti KnY p. �� I j I CONDO P$ '3. POs. 69 t 70 mM�[t V w - fU b I � L-1 { I t I � 11-1 U ,il "=- 'ter- •- ^-- -+.s•- � a JJ 4 © ( i air J 71; - , Lol7a RM7 .r , ktjLCl- IL c `4 �h�OIY 3H, I / 3 =� SITE PLAN r t � | � ' HL WaRM |� !� �-� ^|� �/�� r Tom' r , +Y s ' 1t% I I o 0 0 o -� Y I 1 1 I .d! 0 0 0 0 A 0 0 A A I 0 0 0 0 CIE ` 0 833 1. , LJ o r Tom' r , +Y s ' 1t% I I o 0 0 o -� Y I 1 1 I .d! 0 0 0 0 A 0 0 A A I 0 0 0 0 BAY E�WE O f R � 6 b D ZM �u 1 LANDSCAPE PLAN w. 1tao1 o1p1 /1a LA O-W - -- - -I-- -- IYwvs Ch- LL 1. , 11 rA ii 111 J: 1 1 it JI U 1 11 m a d m It 1 j W. u j � r I BAY E�WE O f R � 6 b D ZM �u 1 LANDSCAPE PLAN w. 1tao1 o1p1 /1a LA O-W - -- - -I-- -- IYwvs Ch- LL CITY OF CLEARWATER OSt426523479 Planning and Development Department , 1Ep �o°{ ph POST OFFICE Box 4748 f%f% 40 0 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-47.48 M 04/19/2013 cc Mailed From 33634 US POSTAGE THURMOND, CAROL HESS LIVING TRUST THURMOND, CAROL HESS THE 829 OLEANDER DR A[ KEN SC 29801 -1 . S uq *:fa v;n no;:�f-7�zi TU'RIN T E IN 1-u E R' .`10T L 4 A VE R AB Lz AS DOWESSED TO F-0R-V.tAR-D 4 1 J 1: 1. 1R i i ................. .... .................... .. jDt .......... � .._ �. �' r - ��.� �_ , ,.. .+ �. � � ..�. ...+ �r .,I, , ry OF WAX11- C- T.- AR, :c� ` -- � , a `'� PLAv€viNc & DEVELOPMENT .DEPARTMEi�T - ;� PomT Or -Box 47 , LoRinA_33778 748 7 48,. CL - ARw, —R F ; u mc(PAL SERVICES BurLnrNC, �00 St)U1Ti MYRTLR AVENUE, CLEAR \xATER; FLOklID� 53756 TELEP11nNE (727) 562 4567 FAY ( 727) 562-4865 . April 16, 2013 RE: NOTICE OF FILING AN APPLICATION FOR FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AT 650 BAY ESPLANADE (FLS2013- 02006); OWNED BY: BAY ESPLANADE PROJECT LLC To Surrounding Property Owners: As a property owner within 500 feet of 650 BAY ESPLANADE, the City of Clearwater Planning and Development Department gives notice that an application has been submitted for Flexible Standard Development application to permit a 102 -room overnight accommodation use in the Tourist (T) District with a lot area of 41,232 square feet (0.95 acres), lot widths of 104 feet along Bay Esplanade (east); 289.98 feet along Bay Esplanade (south) and 182.06 feet along Poinsettia Avenue (west); a front (east) setback of 15 feet (to building); a front (south) setback of 15 feet (to building); a front (west) setback of 21 feet (to building); a side (north) setback of 5 feet (to balcony) and 10 feet (to building); a building height -of 65 feet (from Base Flood Elevation to flat roof); and. 129 off- street parking spaces, pursuant to the Community Development Code Section 2 -802.M and the requirements of the Old Florida District of Beach by Design; and an increase in the maximum density.through the allocation of 55 overnight accommodation units.from the Hotel Density- Reserve created pursuant to Beach by. Design' as well as an increase in the percentage of palm trees to 100 percent where 75 percent is allowable, as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program, pursuant to the Community Development Code Section 3- 1202.G. On May 2, 2013, the Development Review Committee (composed of the City's professional staff) will review and determine whether the application demonstates compliance with the City's Community Development Code. Following that review and determination, the Planning Director will issue a Development Order approving, approving with conditions, or denying the application. The earliest date that the City will make a decision on the application will be May 2, 2013. The City encourages you to participate in the review of this application. You may contact me at 562- 4567x2502 or via email at Kevin .Nurnberger @myclearwater.com forifurther information, visit our office to review the files and /or submit written comments to be considered'.in the City review of the application. Please be advised that the applicant may submit additional or new information regarding this case which.you may review during regular business hours. However, no further notice will be provided to you should the application be amended. An appeal of the decision of the Planning Director may be initiated by the applicant or property owners within the required notice area who present competent substantial evidence at, or prior to, the Development Review Committee meeting on May 2, 2013. An appeal must be filed, including an appeal fee, with the City Clerks Office within seven days of the issuance of the Development Order. Thank you for your interest in the City of Clearwater's development review process. You may access the Planning and Development Department through the City's website: www.myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, 4/16/2013 "EQUAL EMPLOYNIFNT A \D AlTiiw k NE (MON EmPLMER" lelter Ot Notification L� JOIX, IN%Gli. CITY OF CLEARWATER C L g artmen Planning and Development De t �J P P 9q��TEA��o� POST OFFICE BOX 4748 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758 -4748 3 r.t.1.� � 11111. iu i` � @ v� - X15H265234 9 $00,36® 04/18/2013 maited.From 33634 US POSTAGE NATSIS, EVANGELOS NATSIS, MARIA ae�' -- CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING & DEVELopMmh T DEPAR-rmiEtil' PosT OrPicE Boa 4748, CLEARwATER, FLORIDA 337584748 MU17C1PkL SEa ICES BUILDL' cG, 100 .Sou ],tSRTu AVE NUE, CLEAR \TA1'ER, .FLORIDA 33756 7�Y {ATER,�`rt�' TELEPHONE (727).562-4567 FAx ( 727) 5624865 April 16, 2013 RE: NOTICE OF FILING AN APPLICATION FOR FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AT 650 BAY ESPLANADE (FLS2013 -02006); OWNED BY: BAY ESPLANADE PROJECT LLC To Surrounding Property Owners: As a property owner within 500 feet of 650 BAY ESPLANADE, the City of Clearwater Planning and Development Department gives notice that an application has been submitted for Flexible Standard Development application to permit a 102 -room overnight accommodation use in the Tourist (T) District with a lot area of 41,232 square feet (0.95 acres), lot widths of 104 feet along Bay Esplanade (east); 289.98 feet along Bay Esplanade (south) and 182.06 feet along Poinsettia Avenue (west); a front (east) setback of 15 feet (to building); a front (south) setback of 15 feet (to building); a front (west) setback of 21 feet (to building); a side (north) setback of 5 feet (to balcony) and 10 feet (to building); a building height of 65 feet (from Base Flood Elevation to flat roof); and 129 off - street parking spaces, pursuant to the Community Development Code Section 2 -802.M and the requirements of the Old Florida District of Beach by Design; and an increase in the maximum density through the allocation of 55 overnight accommodation units from the Hotel Density Reserve created pursuant to Beach by Design, as well as an increase in the percentage of palm trees to 100 percent where 75 percent is allowable, as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program, pursuant to the Community Development Code Section 3- 1202.G. On May 2, 2013, the Development Review Committee (composed of the City's professional staff) will review and determine whether the application demonstates compliance with the City's Community Development Code. Following that review and determination, the Planning Director will issue a Development Order approving, approving with conditions, or denying the application. The earliest date that the City will make a decision on the application will be May 2, 2013. The City encourages you to participate in the review of this application. You may contact me at 562- 4567x2502 or via email at Kevin .Nurnberger @myclearwater.com for further information, visit our office to review the files and /or submit written comments to be considered in the City review of the application. Please be advised that the applicant may submit additional or new information regarding this case w. hich-you-tiiay =evliiW during regular business .hours, However, no further notice will he provided to you should the application be amended. An appeal of the decision of the Planning Director may be initiated by the applicant or property owners within the required notice area who present competent substantial evidence at, or prior to, the Development Review Committee meeting on May 2, 2013. An appeal must be filed, including an appeal fee, with the City Clerks Office within seven days of the issuance of the Development Order. Thank you for your interest in the City of Clearwater's development review process. You may access the Planning and Development Department through the City's website: www.myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, 4/16/2013 "EQUAL ENTLOYMENT AND A.FFiiw.ki -R E AcflO`r BOWYER" lever OI Notifwtion r�SiAl "� CITY OF CLEARWATER T— 523AT19 Planning and Development Department W M o v �30 POST OFFICE BOX 4748 QQ. w�TE9� ,' CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758 -4748 1 04/18/2013 Mailed From 33634 US POSTAGE G S J FL INVESTMENT INC 1004 US HIGHWAY 19 N STE 102 HOLIDAY FL 34691 -5630 &$ r w r c 7 n sv a e%t L .� ..r c a n RETURN TO SENDER NOT DELIVE.RAELE A'S AD,aRESSED " '' A2 L E TO 13C: 337584748 48 33758@4748 �Ie1111��1�iSl�lll�li�ta2 �s��lla'�g11�11�3alijlldi1r�11� S CM z BNSB 34GS i CITY OF CLEARWATER PLA'INLtiG & DEvaoPMEVT DUARTIdENT . Q. ►; , � POST Olric� Boa 4748, CLLARWATER, FLoRU>A 33758 4748 1�umcfPAL SERy _s BufLDLNc., 100 S(yum M1ii1ZE f�VE \I7E, CIEARWA7'ER, FLORIDA 33756 7 �fiEpikr�;• TELEPHONE ( 727) 562 -4567 FAx ( 727) 5624865 April 16, 2013 RE: NOTICE OF FILING AN APPLICATION FOR FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AT 650 BAY ESPLANADE (FLS2013- 02006); OWNED BY: BAY ESPLANADE PROJECT LLC To Surrounding Property Owners: As a property owner within 500 feet of 650 BAY ESPLANADE, the City of Clearwater Planning and Development Department gives notice that an application has been submitted for Flexible Standard . Development application to permit a 102 -room overnight accommodation use in the Tourist (T) District with a lot area of 41,232 square feet (0.95 acres), lot widths of 104 feet along Bay Esplanade (east); 289.98 feet along Bay Esplanade (south) and 182.06 feet along Poinsettia Avenue (west); a front (east) setback of 15 feet (to building); a front (south) setback of 15 feet (to building); a front (west) setback of 21 feet (to building); a side (north) setback of 5 feet (to balcony) and 10 feet (to building); a building height of 65 feet (from Base Flood Elevation to flat roof); and 129 off - street parking spaces, pursuant to the Community Development Code Section 2 -802.M and the requirements of the Old Florida District of Beach by Design; and an increase in the maximum density through the allocation of 55 overnight accommodation units from the Hotel Density Reserve created pursuant to Beach by Design, as well as an increase in the percentage of palm trees to 100 percent where 75 percent is allowable, as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program, pursuant to the Community Development Code Section 3- 1202.G. On May 2, 2013, the Development Review Committee (composed of the City's professional staff) will review and determine whether the application demonstates compliance with the City's Community Development Code. Following that review and determination, the Planning Director will issue a Development Order approving, approving with conditions, or denying the application. The earliest date that the City will make a decision on the application will be May 2, 2013. The City encourages you to participate in the review of this application. You may contact me at 562- 4567x2502 or via email at Kevin .Nurnberger @myclearwater.com for further information, visit our office to review the files and /or submit written comments to be considered in the City review of the application. Please be advised that the applicant may submit additional or new information regarding this case which:you may -review during regular business= hours. Ho vever, no furthor notice :•rill be provided to you, -- should the application be amended. An appeal of the decision of the Planning Director may be initiated by the applicant or property owners within the required notice area who present competent substantial evidence at, or prior to, the Development Review Committee meeting on May 2, 2013. An appeal must be filed, including an appeal fee, with the City Clerks Office within seven days of the issuance of. the Development Order. Thank you for your interest in the City of Clearwater's development review process. You may access the Planning and Development Department through the City's website: www.myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, 1_," 4/16/2013 "EQUAL EMPLO)WENT k,TD A..PTuwA7'NF, ACDON b•vi o. _Er," Letter CO Nolff— ion {SEAI '0 � CITY OF CLEARWATER 3 Planning and Development Department POST OFFICE BOX 4748 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758 -4748 MAR 17 2013 ! PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPT CITY Qr- ►_E4f?�.NAT�R h 1066363 ONTARIO LTD 152 CLARENDON ST SOUTHAMPTON ON MOH 2LO CA i 58'.0 _4 7 US POSTAGE 0161-I26523473. $ O0ao go 02/21/2093 N6amw From 33534 US POSTAGE ALa C-iT,Y--.p .F �C L,E A R W�A.,T E R` A"', PLANNING & DFVLLOPYII N -r DLiPAR7 me T wQti r 1'Otir Onxcr.,B<�a,4743, (LrnRYn�i R, FLOxrnA 3375 478 , Mdm mka SRS is e 73vfLniw : 100 so'u F► 1N1yizTLL AvENi1E CUARV ATER, FLoi6 33 7 56,: -. Pr.HI >HON (727) "562 4�6 i. Fax (727) >62 -4865 February 15, 2013 RE: NOTICE OF FILING AN APPLICATION FOR FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AT 650 BAY ESPLANADE (FLS2013- 02006); OWNED BY: BAY ESPLANADE PROJECT LLC To Surrounding Property Owners: As a property owner within 500 feet of 650 BAY ESPLANADE, the City of Clearwater Planning and Development Department gives notice that an application has been submitted for Flexible Standard Development application to permit a 102 -room overnight accommodation use in the Tourist (T) District with a lot area of 41,232 square feet (0.95 acres), lot widths of 104 feet along Bay Esplanade (east); 289.98 feet along Bay Esplanade (south) and 182.06 feet along Poinsettia Avenue (west); a front (east) setback of 15 feet (to building); a front (south) setback of 15 feet (to building); a front (west) setback of 15 feet (to building) and 13 feet (to concrete pad); a side .(north) setback of 10 feet (to building); a building;height of 65, feet (from Base`Flood Elevation to.flat roof); and 127 off = street parking spaces, pursuanCfo;the Community Development' Code' Section2 =802.M and.jhe Ola..Florida District -standards in Beach by Design; and an increase in the maximum�density through the"allocation of 55 overnight accommodation units from the Hotel Density Reserve created pursuant to Beach by Design, as well as a reduction to the foundation landscaping along Ba'y Esplanade from'five feet to zero feet and an increase in the number of palm trees and accent trees in lieu of shade trees, as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program, pursuant to the Community Development Code Section 3- 1202.G. On March 7, 2013, the Development Review Committee (composed of the City's professional staff) will review and determine whether the application demonstates compliance with the City's Community Development Code. Following that review and determination, the Planning Director will issue a Development Order approving, approving with conditions, or denying the application. The earliest date that the City will make a decision on the application will be March 7, 2013. The City encourages you to participate in the review of this application. You may contact me at 562- 4567x2502 or via email at Kevin .Nurnberger @myclearvvater.com for further information, visit our office to review the files and /or submit written comments to be considered in the City review of the application. Please be advised that the applicant may submit additional or new information regarding this case which you may review during regular business hours. However, no further notice will be provided to you should the application be amended. An appeal of the decision of the Planning Director may be initiated by the applicant or property owners within the required notice area who present competent substantial evidence at, or prior to, the Development Review Committee meeting on March 7, 2013. An appeal must be filed, including an appeal fee, with the City Clerks Office within seven days of the issuance of the Development Order. I Thank you for your interest in the City of Clearwater's development review process. You may access the Planning and Development Department through the City's website: www.myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, 2/15/2013 °�Qlia1. E�iP1:11'ivt; >\ r A \D iFF11ZMATNE ACr10N Btpi.oyn,," Letter Ot Notification CITY OF CLEARWATER Aj -co Planning and Development Department POST OFFICE Box 4748 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 0 13 33634 G S J FL INVESTMENT INC 1004 US HIGHWAY 19 N STE 102 HOLIDAY FL 34691-5630 RQTURN TO SENDER NOT DELIVERABLE AS AD -DRESSEV T CCRW_A.R.D BC: 33758474848 2 5 7 4 - 085 6 4 2 -4 4 3 337'58 @4.748 1 CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING & DEvaopm -Ew DEPARTi h-,,T <A ; PcxT Oirlrc BOti 4748, CLCARVGATCR, FLORIDA 337 >84748 MuNicirnr. Sr:>zv ic.ES Bunnrrrc; 100 Sor r Ms�R IE AVENUE, CLEARW IER, FI RM 33 756 �rgTERyr1�'' TELEPHONE (727) 562456✓ FAx (727) 5624865 April 16, 2013 RE: NOTICE OF FILING AN APPLICATION FOR FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AT 650 BAY ESPLANADE (FLS2013- 02006); OWNED BY: BAY ESPLANADE PROJECT LLC To Surrounding Property Owners: As a property owner within 500 feet of 650 BAY ESPLANADE, the City of Clearwater Planning and Development Department gives notice that an application has been submitted for Flexible Standard Development application to permit a 102 -room overnight accommodation use in the Tourist (T) District with a lot area of 41,232 square feet (0.95 acres), lot widths of 104 feet along Bay Esplanade (east); 289.98 feet along Bay Esplanade (south) and 182.06 feet along Poinsettia Avenue (west); a front (east) setback of 15 feet (to building); a front (south) setback of 15 feet (to building); a front (west) setback of 21 feet (to building); a side (north) setback of 5 feet (to balcony) and 10 feet (to building); a building height of 65 feet (from Base Flood Elevation to flat roof); and 129 off - street parking spaces, pursuant to the Community Development Code Section 2 -802.M and the requirements of the Old Florida District of Beach by Design; and an increase in the maximum density through the allocation of 55 overnight accommodation units from the Hotel Density Reserve created pursuant to Beach by Design, as well as an increase in the percentage of palm trees to 100 percent where 75 percent is allowable, as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program, pursuant to the Community Development Code Section 3- 1202.G. On May 2, 2013, the Development Review Committee (composed of the City's professional staff) will review and determine whether the application demonstates compliance with the City's Community Development Code. Following that review and determination, the Planning Director will issue a Development Order approving, approving with conditions, or denying the application. The earliest date that the City will make a decision on the application will be May 2, 2013. The City encourages you to participate in the review of this application. You may contact me at 562- 4567x2502 or via email at Kevin .Nurnberger @myclearwater.com for further information, visit our office to review the files and /or submit written comments to be considered in the City review of the application. Please be advised that the applicant may submit additional or new information regarding this case which,you may review during regular business hours: He ✓ever, .c f;:rthier notice will be provided to you should the application be amended. An appeal of the decision of the Planning Director may be initiated by the applicant or property owners within the required notice area who present competent substantial evidence at, or prior to, the Development Review Committee meeting on May 2, 2013. An appeal must be filed, including an appeal fee, with the City Clerks Office within seven days of the issuance of the Development Order. Thank you for your interest in the City of Clearwater's development review process. You may access the Planning and Development Department through the City's website: www.myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, 4/1(6/2013 "EQUAL RNIPLOYNIE \T ATD Ah'nimAiwE A(MON EmPLMER" Leper m Nol'rfiw ion CITY OF CLEARWATER Planning and Development Department POST OFFICE Box 4748 TE, CI.EARWATER,-FLORIDA 33758-4748 am ILK, IIJ to P0.360- 00 V1 04118/2013 to Xft cc & mailed From 33634 I. ;r US POSTAGE CAPRI MOTEL CONDO ASSN 55 SOMERSET ST APT 3 CLEARWATER FL 33767-1546 F 0-41'2,16'111�& RE-T-URN Tn- SE.N.f-)F-R I�JOT A.'--,, V, , E 'To Z L R.W.AA-Z -9 4.7 4,84-8 2 4 7 4 4--Z'S -7: 3: 7 9 -C. 3.375 �tit�f�at�r CITY OF CLEARWATER ��II\asK PLA�rv�vc & DEvELoPmL -n Dta�AxrNh�� POST Otricr Box 4748, C1:EARw,ATER FLORIDA 33758 =4748 t� MuNi(7iYAL SER\ICES BUII.)ING, I00 SOtq' I MI-RIU t1VEN CLLAR \xATER, FLOwn A 33756 QM NOV TELEPHONE (727) 562 -4567 FAx ( 727) 562 4865 April 16, 2013 RE: NOTICE OF FILING AN APPLICATION FOR FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AT 650 BAY ESPLANADE (FLS2013- 02006); OWNED BY: BAY ESPLANADE PROJECT LLC To Surrounding.Property.Owners:_ . As a property owner within 500 feet of 650 BAY ESPLANADE, the City of Clearwater Planning and Development Department gives notice that an application has been submitted for Flexible Standard Development application to permit a 102 -room overnight accommodation use in the Tourist (T) District with a lot area of 41,232 square feet (0.95 acres), lot widths of 104 feet along Bay Esplanade (east); 289.98 feet along Bay Esplanade (south) and 182.06 feet along Poinsettia Avenue (west); a front (east) setback of 15 feet (to building); a front (south) setback of 15 feet (to building); a front (west) setback of 21 feet (to building); a side (north) setback of 5 feet (to balcony) and 10 feet (to building); a building height of 65 feet (from Base Flood Elevation to flat roof); and 129 off - street parking spaces, pursuant to the Community Development Code Section 2 -802.M and the requirements of the Old Florida District of Beach by Design; and an increase in the maximum density through the allocation of 55 overnight accommodation units from the Hotel Density Reserve created pursuant to Beach by Design, as well as an increase in the percentage of palm trees to 100 percent where 75 percent is allowable, as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program, pursuant to the Community Development Code Section 3- 1202.G.. On May 2, 2013, the Development Review Committee (composed of the City's professional staff) will review and determine whether the application demonstates compliance with the City's Community Development Code. Following that review and determination, the Planning Director will issue a Development Order approving, approving with conditions, or denying the application. The earliest date that the City will make a decision on the application will be May 2, 2013. The City encourages you to participate in the review of this application. You may contact me at 562- 4567x2502 or via email at Kevin .Nurnberger @myclearwater.com for further information, visit our office to review the files and /or submit written comments to be considered in the City review of the application. Please be advised that the applicant may submit additional or new information regarding this case which you-niay review during regular business hours. However, no further notice will be prc:rided to you should the application be amended. . An appeal of the decision of the Planning Director may be initiated by the applicant or property owners within the required notice area who present competent substantial evidence at, or prior to, the Development Review Committee meeting on May 2, 2013. An appeal must be filed, including an appeal fee, with the City Clerks Office within seven days of the issuance of the Development Order. Thank you for your interest in the City of Clearwater's development review process. You may access the Planning and Development Department through the City's website: www.myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, i 4/16/2013 TQuAL &PLOYINIE \r AND pFl uiml R`E AC nON EmPLOM," Leher_Of_NotifiWjon SE�t "Lci CITY OF CLEARWATER y _,y - 3 Planning and Development Department w Q POST OFFICE BOX 4748 a5 G7 $00.362. �AtEp CLEARWATER,FLORIDA 33758 -4748 w� � 04/18/2013 n' OC Mailed From 33634 US POSTAGE 13 WITHAM, DARLENE f 55 SOMERSET ST UNIT 1 i CLEARWATER_FL337A7 -1rA9 Nixie 3 Ems. s air +r ".1 i3 RETURN TO CEN.D.ER f •fillOT DELTVEsue.ABL.E AaS ADDRE5.SS.E.0 I N.A".S -L E TO F-ORWARD BC: 3j3758474'i848 } '24 }7774 - 04851] -25 -37 t.1 1,E31'.d�F�7$ 4 � 111' }'1 I7i111 '��lll ?'ji�'i!1li.1f7�i7I!'�5 �i71711�il I1'ff 11 �ill�i i! ,.��a';� CITY OF CLEARWATER �t \I/'ara'r" A " PLANNING & DEVELOPMh.NT DLPARTmhE rr 4` POST OrricE Box 4748, QaRWATER, FLORIDA 33758 -4748 � ►� Mu.,,IcfPAL SERvicF_s BunDugG, 100 Soo MiTrl[EAVE \TIg CLl?AR A7'hR, FLOwDA 33 ?56 TELEPHONE (727) 5624567 FAX ( 727) 5624865 April 16, 2013 RE: NOTICE OF FILING AN APPLICATION FOR FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AT 650 BAY ESPLANADE (FLS2013 -02006); OWNED BY: BAY ESPLANADE PROJECT LLC To Surrounding Property- Owners: As a property owner within 500 feet of 650 BAY ESPLANADE, the City of Clearwater Planning and Development Department gives notice that an application has been submitted for Flexible Standard Development application to permit a 102 -room overnight accommodation use in the Tourist (T) District with a lot area of 41,232 square feet (0.95 acres), lot widths of 104 feet along Bay Esplanade (east); 289.98 feet along Bay Esplanade (south) and 182.06 feet along Poinsettia Avenue (west); a front (east) setback of 15 feet (to building); a front (south) setback of 15 feet (to building); a front.(west) setback of 21 feet (to building); a side (north) setback of 5 feet (to balcony) and 10 feet (to building); a building height of 65 feet (from Base Flood Elevation to flat roof); and 129 off - street parking spaces, pursuant to the Community Development Code Section 2 -802.M and the requirements of the Old Florida District of Beach by Design; and an increase in the maximum density through the allocation of 55 overnight accommodation units from the Hotel Density Reserve created pursuant to Beach by Design, as well as an increase in the percentage of palm trees to 100 percent where 75 percent is allowable, as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program, pursuant to the Community Development Code Section 3- 1202.G. On May 2, 2013, the Development Review Committee (composed of the City's professional staff) will review and determine whether the application demonstates compliance with the City's Community Development Code. Following that review and determination, the Planning Director will issue a Development Order approving, approving with conditions, or denying the application. The earliest date that the City will make a decision on the application will be May 2, 2013. The City encourages you to participate in the review of this application. You may contact me at 562- 4567x2502 or via email at Kevin .Nurnberger @myclearwater.com for further information, visit our office to review the files and /or submit written comments to be considered in the City review of the application. Please be advised that the applicant may submit additional or new information regarding this case which you may review - during regular business hours. However, no further notice will be provided to you should the application be amended. An appeal of the decision of the Planning Director may be initiated by the applicant or property owners within the required notice area who present competent substantial evidence at, or prior to, the Development Review Committee meeting on May 2, 2013. An appeal must be filed, including an appeal fee, with the City Clerks Office within seven days of the issuance of the Development Order. Thank you for your interest in the City of Clearwater's development review process. You may access the Planning and Development Department through the City's website: www.myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, 4/1`16/2013 "EQUAL EMPLOYPYIENT A \D .PFIlIaIATRT ACTION DPI.oYER° Lefler Of NoflfiWlion Nrrr/r figEAl «��1 CITY OF CLEARWATER R' Planning and Development Department 99��TEp� POST OFFICE Box 4748 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-47.48 I LIRA, NESTOR 9330 JAMAICA DR i MIAMI FL 33189 -1706 0E 3f 8 . t 7'S - 48 1 S :0415 .1 ..� 00.362 Li v®i r do 0 04/19/2013 w W = M Mailed From 33634 CL U US POSTAGE NIXIE 334 EE 1 0 0 i5%`227'13 RETURN TO SENDER NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED UNABLE TO FORWARD BC: 33758474848 =°0301- 02513 -Z2 -45 EM Hasler 04/22/2013 $00.04' w m 71P 33634 IL LL 011D1260225 lk I ft I CAPRI MOTEL CONDO ASSN 55 SOMERSET ST APT 3 CLEARWATER FL 33767-1546 33758@47 va bmist4sB 337.7167 4 7"D $00.369 -GS/2112013 ma➢ied From 33634 US POSTAGE V41 l6 ,N.A8 LE T6 FORW_ARD SC: 33758474848 "2474-072713-24-3B Ila CITY OF CLEARWATER :* Planning and Development Department POST OFFICE. Box 4748 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 ou 13 W4-, ce Ix CL CAPRI MOTEL CONDO ASSN 55 SOMERSET ST APT 3 CLEARWATER FL 33767-1546 33758@47 va bmist4sB 337.7167 4 7"D $00.369 -GS/2112013 ma➢ied From 33634 US POSTAGE V41 l6 ,N.A8 LE T6 FORW_ARD SC: 33758474848 "2474-072713-24-3B Ila tiaSEAI "`Gl` CITY OF CLEARWATER �_,___ Planning and Development Department 9P�, OQe POST OFFICE BOX 4748 CLEARWATFR, FLORIDA 33758-4748 u TO 1>d � 0'U M; cc fX a X THURMOND, CAROL HESS LIVING TRUST THURMOND, CAROL_ HESS THE 829 OLEANDER DR AIKEN SC 29801 -5165 a t t I ;1 74 Iu4.Y 4'Ti +il . $ 00.360 r 05/21/2013 Matted From 33634 US POSTAGE NIXIE. 300 DE 1 00 05/31/13 RE TURN TO SENDER Of A e-- T UNABLE TO FORWARD BC; 33758474848 1991- 06441- 11 -08 ADAMS AND REESE LLP Attorneys at Law Alabama ® Florida Louisiana Mississippi May 17, 2013 Tennessee Texas Washington, DC V. James Dickson. Direct: 727.502.8206 Kevin Nurnberger E -Fax: 727:502.8906 City of Clearwater james.dickson @arlaw.com Planning and Development Department Post Office Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758 -4748 Re: DeNunzio Hotel; Received 650 Bay Esplanade Clearwater Beach Florida Bay Esplanade Project LLC, MAY 1 � 2013 Case No. FLS- 2013 -02006 Planning & Development Dear Mr. Nurnberger: This Firm represents William Letourneau and Debora Hirsch who have owned and resided at Unit 305 of Penthouse Shores, 661 Poinsettia Avenue for the past 7 1/2 years. This letter is intended to serve as record evidence to the Development Review Committee of objections to the above referenced proposed hotel project. 1. Current zoning for the site property would allow 47 units. The request for development approval is to more than double that regulatory limit to 102 units. A doubling of allowable transitory units is simply too extreme for: • the size of the lot; • the nature of neighborhood; and • the impact on the residential properties to the north of the Project which will only be about 10 feet from this massive structure. 2. A hotel facility serving a transitory tourist population of this magnitude is .not appropriate for this location given the adjacent neighbors who are permanent residents. 3. The proposed structure will severely impact its neighbors to the north. Unit 305 at 661 Poinsettia Avenue (Penthouse Shores) is directly north of the proposed hotel. Attached as Exhibit A is a photograph that shows the distance of the existing Units at 661 Poinsettia Avenue to the property line and the configuration of these units. These existing units. were built almost to the property line. Attached as Exhibit B is the floor plans for the proposed six story hotel. It indicates, as is confirmed by Notice of Filing An Application for Flexible Standard Development Approval dated April 16; 2013, that the proposed structure will have only a five (5) foot setback to balconies and no more than a 28819601.1 150 Second Avenue North, Suite 1700 1 St. Petersburg, Florida 337011727.502.8200 1 Fax 727.502.8282 www.adamsandreese.com Correspondence re 650 &-y Esplanade FLS2013 -02006 Page 2 of 3 ten (10) foot setback to the building from the property line. This places Unit 305 windows, and windows of similar Units at 661 Poinsettia Avenue which face south, only a few feet from the proposed hotel structure which for the first three floors will serve as a parking garage. 4. The owners of Unit 305 as a third floor unit along with their neighbors, will suffer severe adverse impacts by the proposed structure if it is built in its current form. a) The plans for the proposed structure indicates that an automobile ramp and Aparking spaces will be situated opposite Unit 305 windows and balcony. Given the ten foot distance from the parking ramp and spaces to the Unit's windows, the Unit will be constantly impacted by the sound and exhaust of automobiles. As a hotel the parking structure will likely have far more automobile traffic in its garage than would typically occur in a residential structure. At night the Unit, including the bedroom will be infused with automobile lights in addition to the sound and smell of the automobiles. This will severely limit the beneficial use of Unit 305 and similarly situated units. b) The six story height and location of the building will block all sunshine to the Unit and severely limit air flow. c) The plans for the proposed structure contemplate an outdoor pool for the 102 proposed hotel rooms on the fourth floor. This pool will be located just a few feet above and slightly to the west of Unit 305. The sound from such a pool used by guests in 102 rooms will likely be very noisy and further impact reasonable beneficial use of Unit 305 by its owners. d) T- Mobile has advised that the size of this new structure will substantially aggravate if not totally block existing service for cell phone and WiFi use in Unit 305. 5. Unit 305 and its neighboring units will not be able to be accessed by fire services given the' limited ten foot width between structures. Unit 305 will not be accessible from any other direction given existing structures. This situation creates a serious life safety issue. 6. This neighborhood has been selected by many existing residents including the owners of Unit 305, because of the neighborhood's Old World Florida ambiance. The neighborhood has a friendly atmosphere, idyllic setting, low level building and a nice mix of residents and tourists. It continues to be quiet and low key. At any time of the day one can see folks strolling or biking up and down Bay Esplanade. The magnitude of this Project dramatically changes that environment. Correspondence re 650 Buy Esplanade FLS2013 -02006 Page 3 of 3 7. A proposed Hampton Hotel on south beach, was denied because its 116 rooms on .8 acres was too big for that commercial area. This location is an effective residential area. The ,proposed doubling of the zoned density to 102 rooms on .9 acres in th.is residential area is less appropriate than the denied Hampton Project which was in a more commercial setting. As indicated by the foregoing, the proposed Project significantly and unreasonably deprives my clients and their neighbors of the reasonable beneficial use of their existing home. They will be subject to excessive sound, light, and odor which will likely be generated within a few feet of their home. They will lose access to sunlight and sea breezes. The Project adversely impacts their fire safety. The. Project adversely impacts the ambience of their community. For these reasons, the proposed project seeking to increase density from 47 units to 102 units and construct such a structure within feet of existing units should be denied. Yours truly James Dickson vjdNJD Enclosures cc: William Letourneau Debora Hirsch Michael Delk Mayor George Crekekos Vice Mayor Paul Gibson Councilman Bill Jonson rr /Ili IRA! 44� is 1Q 4145e, 0� Exhibit "A-2" X "'ll Exhibit "A-1" I 11 I I I I l I � � Y gsP1AN� I �v 1 FIRST FLOOR PLAN \ // Scut' �•. f / , flo I I I I 1 1 I avc ' . ouuo a > i _.. O a z w 41 a L w w w -- —0 II 1I z I m aw I � I .....__ ............... 1. Is p�� I 11 I I I I l I � � Y gsP1AN� I �v 1 FIRST FLOOR PLAN \ // Scut' �•. f / , Exhibit "B" C iiius�eai.xutun w C {N Y� sn s �r- [J u: •Y; 9.�A�u�iv:��kanxmauau�ntue. J � J N O t _O a - 3 av z w n` E m I ,eD N12.02 Plans Level 1 2013 04 -10� A -001 flo l —0 II 1I z I m .....__ ............... 1. Is Ig 1 __ 15 _- ___________._ I Exhibit "B" C iiius�eai.xutun w C {N Y� sn s �r- [J u: •Y; 9.�A�u�iv:��kanxmauau�ntue. J � J N O t _O a - 3 av z w n` E m I ,eD N12.02 Plans Level 1 2013 04 -10� A -001 I I T T— ID . . ....... . ..... . ......... . .... z m < Z < >( 11 -- L .... J L I L Z R .... ---- — — — — — — — — — — — — Or- - - - - - - ------------- 7@. -117 0 ai 43) (n Q O_L;C�ND FLOOR PLAN Z. DE N 12.02 Plans Level 2 2013.04.10 A-002 G) . ...... . ..... . .......... a kl.....M I I 1 m .. . ........... > < Z. L L Z .......... 0.; (D 0;H� D LAN 9KEYS �LOOR P �2 10 U LD N Z LU (D E co L) DEN 12.02 Plans Level 3 2013.04.10 A-003 ,..1 R r� Cyi wunxae eunowas C+ e�nn..os :3 I I I I eJ 5, I bx w a e 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 •l 1 I 1 ' 1 W �� D 1 1 U- L.-LL—i Q Z .n as � x .d oeaxE i c U YY - I m � I Z� w a ` 1 FOURTH FLOOR PLAN 31 KEYS p °� I veOrt DEN 12.02 Plans Level 4 e 2013.04.10 naEauz;nazx.�ana A -004 f� a t:l M _ - - -- - - -. -- I Z m > > < D w _ _ m u C m m rn I 6 Py ESP / :3 a n V m U IFIFTH FLOOR PLAN 32 KEYS O1f DEN12.02 Plans Level 5 2013.04.10 A -005 I 1 JI �° IT I Z I F] I 1 D 1 1 1 I 0 1 m a w el I tt Z a Y I � Ix,'o 50 - - x a U l I 1 I mx 1 3 I I I ----------- P, 1 SIXc THLOOR PLAN 30 KEYS \ / 4, r.l �IM f1: ptip IY. U w U � O _`o n. a O � a �N � 7 a a Z w a 05 m U ow, DEN12.02 Pl. level 6 101304 10 A -006 I r �t urnberger, Kevin T From: William Letourne [letoursch @aol.com] Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2 To: Nurnberger, Kevin Subject: Fwd: Objection to the Proposed Building at 650 Bay Esplanade FLS 2013 -02006 Good Morning Kevin, We sent this e-mail with our concerns and questions back on March 5th. We have not had any response to our questions and concerns. We have called ... to no success. I write to ask if we can have a meeting with you tomorrow, Mon April 29Th to discuss our concerns. We also have not been able to access the drawings or comments, etc for the 650 Bay Esplanade project from the City's website. We'd really like to know exactly what will be reviewed this Thursday May2nd and at what time the meeting is to be held so we can attend. Anxiously awaiting a response. Thank you, we can be reached at 651.459.4336 Debby Hirsch & Bill Letourneau - - - -- Original Message---- - From: William Letourneau <letoursch @aol.com> To: Kevin. Nurnberger < Kevin .Nurnberger @MyClearwater.com> Sent: Tue, Mar 5, 2013 3:17 pm Subject: Objection to the Proposed Building at 650 Bay Esplanade FLS 2013 -02006 Dear Kevin, My husband (William Letourneau) and I ( Debora Hirsch) have resided at Penthouse Shores, 661 Poinsettia Ave # 305 for 7 1/2 years. We have serious concerns about the applicability of the proposed hotel. As a resident of Penthouse Shores our unit, ( along with # 205 & #105 who are also residents) is directly north of the proposed hotel. All our windows face south which means we will be barely 10 feet from the parking ramp and a concrete building ....no sun, no trees, no street, no island setting, no air. Wow, we could nearly reach out and touch some one as they drive up the parking ramp. We will have noise, lights shining in our home: living room, lanai, dining room & bedroom plus the noise and odors. We chose this location, 22 years ago, to be our retirement home because of the Old World Florida ambiance. Friendly atmosphere, idyllic setting, low level building and a nice mix of residents and tourists. It continues to be quiet and low key. At any time of the day one can see folks strolling or biking up and down Bay Esplanade. An increase in traffic would surely jeopardise the pedestrian friendliness and safety of Bay Esplanade. • Can Bay Esplanade even support such increased traffic? • What impact will a 102 room hotel have on the annual occupancy percentage of the "mom and pop" condos and motels in this surrounding area who are already struggling? • Why is an additional 55 rooms possible? That is more than double the amount alotted. • How will the Fire dept be able to handle, say a fire on the north side of the hotel? There is no back access indicated. * What about the infrastructure; water, sewer etc.? rA How will the building process affect the integrity of our structure? • Has an arborist been out to examine the trees on the property? There are several that we have been told are protected and cannot be removed. • Where is there anything like this proposal anywhere on the north end much less on Clearwater Beach? • How much will our property be DEVALUED if this hotel is allowed to be built? We understand that the proposed Hampton, on south beach, was denied because its 116 rooms on .8 acres was too big for that commercial area. How can it be possible for a 102 rooms on .9 acres be "ok" in a non commercial, more residential area? We understand that the Mariott would like to build, how about on the south beach with the other like hotels. There is a very large track of land by the Sand Key bridge just begging for a builder. , Please feel free to call us .... 651.459.4336. Thank You! William Letourneau Debby Hirsch CITY OF C LT A R.WA T E R � Pavv Nc C llrvl:l,orw vT DEPARTMENT 4 POS-1. 011 l(r Box 47448, CL1iAR14iATr;R, FLORIDA 33758 4748 •tj' `99' �0�, v1CTV1cipu Smvicis BU:.DLNG; .100 Sourni 11't1°IZru ANTNUE, CLPARNC•ATFR, FLORIDA 3., . 56 % g7E�;k it T;I.FiHoN -F (72.7) 562-4567 FAx ( 727) 5624865 February 15, 2013 RE: NOTICE OF FILING AN APPLICATION FOR FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AT 650 BAY ESPLANADE (FLS2013- 02006); OWNED BY: BAY ESPLANADE PROJECT LLC To Surrounding Property Owners: As a property owner within 500 feet of 650 BAY ESPLANADE, the City of Clearwater Planning and Development Department gives notice that an application has been submitted for Flexible Standard Development application to permit a 102 -room overnight accommodation use in the Tourist (T) District with a lot area of 41,232 square feet (0.95 acres), lot widths of 104 feet along Bay Esplanade (east); 289.98 feet along Bay Esplanade (south) and 182.06 feet along Poinsettia Avenue (west); a front (east) setback of 15 feet (to building); a front (south) setback of 15 feet (to building); a front (west) setback of 15 feet (to building) and 13 feet (to concrete pad); a side (north) setback of 10 feet (to building); a building height of 65 feet (from Base Flood Elevation to flat roof); and 127 off - street parking spaces, pursuant to the Community Development Code Section 2 -802.M and the Old Florida District standards in Beach by Design; and an increase in the maximum density through the allocation of 55 overnight accommodation units from the Hotel Density Reserve created pursuant to Beach by Design, as well as a reduction to the foundation landscaping along Bay Esplanade from five feet to zero feet and an increase in the number of palm trees and accent trees in lieu of shade trees, as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program, pursuant to the Community Development Code Section 3- 1202.G. On March 7, 2013, the Development Review Committee (composed of the City's professional staff) will review and determine whether the application demonztates compliance with the City's Community Development Code. Following that review and dete, mination, the Planning Director will issue a Development Order approving, approving with conditions, or denying the application. The earliest date that the City will make a decision on the application will be March 7, 2013. The City encourages you to participate in the revie-o of this application. You may contact me at 562 - 4557x2502 or via „naii at f c:'t.rthe r inf ormata n, visit our office to review the files and /or submit written comments to be considered in the City review of the application. Please be advised that the applicant may submit additional or new information regarding this case which you may review during regular business hours. However, no further notice will be provided to you should the application be amended. An appeal of the decision of the Planning Director may be initiated by the applicant or property owners within the required notice area who present competent substantial evidence at, or prior to, the Development Review Committee meeting on March 7, 2013. An appeal must be filed, including an appeal fee, with the City Clerks Office within seven days of the issuance of the Development Order. Thank you for your interest in the City of Clearwater's development review process. You may access the Planning and Development Department through the City's website: www.myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, � 2/15/2013 7 4-� n, u �Q[:ST. '�iPl.t?1 "~Il; \'i : \ \D <�F1'iflt,lA'I'Tt''Ii ,�CnO \' E1tPLOl`EK Leller Of_Notificali- Zoning .......................... DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE Clearwater Beach by Design (Old Florida District) } PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT r Tourist (T) District U STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: June 6, 2013 AGENDA ITEM: 2:00 PM CASE: FLS2013 -02006 (Related to DVA2013- 02001) REQUEST: Flexible Standard Development application to permit a 102 -room overnight accommodation use in the Tourist (T) District with a lot area of 41,232 square feet (0.95 acres), lot widths of 104 feet along Bay Esplanade (east); 289.98 feet along Bay Esplanade (south) and 182.06 feet along Poinsettia Avenue (west); a front (east) setback of 13.1 feet (to building); front (south) setback of 15 feet (to building); front (west) setbacks of 18 feet (to balconies) and 23 feet (to building); a side (north) setback of eight feet (to balconies) and ten feet (to building); a building height of 75 feet (from Base Flood Elevation to mid -point of decorative roof structure); 131 off - street parking spaces; and a request for a two -year Development Order, pursuant to the Community Development Code Section 2- 802.M, Section 4 -303 and the requirements of the Old Florida District of Beach by Design; and an increase in the maximum density through the allocation of 55 overnight accommodation units from the Hotel Density Reserve created pursuant to Beach by Design, as well as an increase in the percentage of palm trees to 100 percent where 75 percent is allowable, as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program, pursuant to the Community Development Code Section 3- 1202.G. GENERAL DATA: Agent ........................... Landon, Moree & Associates (Randy Austin, representative) Applicant / Owner .............. Bay Esplanade Project, LLC Location ........................... 650 Bay Esplanade; the subject property (0.95 acres) is located on the northeast corner of the Poinsettia Avenue and Bay Esplanade intersection. Property Size .................... 0.95 Acres Future Land Use Plan...... Resort Facilities High (RFH) Zoning .......................... Tourist (T) District Special Area Plan .............. Beach by Design (Old Florida District) Adjacent Zoning... North: Tourist (T) District South: Tourist (T) District East: Tourist (T) District West: Tourist (T) District Existing Land Use ............. Vacant Land Proposed Land Use......... Overnight Accommodations S U Level I Flexible Standard Development Application Review ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 0.95 acre subject property is located on the northeast corner of the Poinsettia Avenue and Bay Esplanade intersection. The property consists of the following vacant parcels of land: • 05/29/15/54756/082 /0010; • 05/29/15/54756/082 /0020; • 05/29/15/54756/082 /0110; • 05/29/15/54756/082 /0120; and • 05/29/15/54756/082 /0130. The adjacent property to the north consists of the three -story condominium building and its associated parking lot. The properties to the east across Bay Esplanade consist of a two -story motel, vacant land and attached dwelling units. The properties to the south, across Bay Esplanade, consist of single -story and two -story attached dwelling units. The property to the west, across Poinsettia Avenue, consists of multiple attached dwelling single -story buildings. Development Proposal: The owners of the property propose to build a six - story, 102 -room overnight accommodation with a building footprint of 29,332 square feet on 0.95 acres in the Old Florida character district in Beach by Design. The building will be 75 feet in height (from base Flood Elevation to mid- point of decorative roof structure) and 78.4 feet in height (to top of elevator shaft room). The first three levels are divided between hotel rooms /function space and a parking garage. The majority of the first three levels (approximately 18,300 square feet per level, respectively) will be a parking garage consisting of a total of 131 off - street parking spaces. The parking garage will have two entrances /exits onto Bay Esplanade. The primary entrance will be along the north/south portion of the road with the other entrance along the east/west portion of the road. A solid waste /maintenance vehicle entrance will be on Poinsettia Avenue. PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION FLS2013 -02006 Page 1 :. I IJ , Q AUC)A STS , PROJECT �T SITE •,. ,, .,` �. !' � 'k i ; - O 0.ENDAtE POtAI WAY •�•�•�'• it i EA AwNw J:I MY ESaIANADE SAYMONT ST LOCATION MAP — , S MERSEY S7 T ROYAL WAY P r� i T - - - -- e y GZQ, : OSIR P _�.• . JUANffA WAY ZONING MAP PD1 LE A FEUIN — ��I� - ' -�111� _ (DS a,•T RILJJ vr,'N P A� — t)WtCL m a J: N 1 001 ' lJ I I Ir ' r_ II pp I 9 •p. EXISTING SURROUNDING USES MAP FLS2013 -02006 Page 1 (` p ea p PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT V wate¢p r Level I Flexible Standard Development Application Review DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION _..._. _ _.. _._ The remaining square footage (approximately 6,824 square feet per level, respectively) between the first floor and third floor will consist of an interior lobby and reception room, offices , and breakfast area (on first floor); meeting rooms, mechanical rooms, and a laundry room (on the second floor); and hotel rooms (on the third floor). These hotel rooms and function spaces are located at the west end of the hotel building facing Poinsettia Avenue. The plans indicate the primary way of entrance to the building and ground level main lobby is through the parking garage. Pedestrian guests will enter a ground level doorway into the garage to access the main lobby and elevator. Each level of the parking garage will have access into the hotel by having a lobby with access to elevators and stairs. The remaining three levels of the hotel, the fourth through the sixth floors, sit atop the parking garage which serves as the building pedestal. The fourth floor consists of hotel rooms, but will also have a fitness center, an outdoor tiki bar, and an outdoor pool. The outdoor pool and tiki bar will be located on terrace at the east end of the building overlooking Clearwater Harbor. The fifth and sixth floors consist of hotel rooms The building plans show approximately 4,650 square feet of interior space will consist of a typical hotel amenities such as breakfast area, meeting rooms, pre - function rooms, and a fitness center. The proposal is to construct a 102 -unit overnight accommodation use at a density of 107.7 units per acre, which includes the allocation of 55 units from the Hotel Density Reserve under Beach by Design. The Development Review Committee reviewed and approved the site plan and building design at its June 6, 2013 meeting subject conditions. A companion Development Agreement (DVA2013- 02001) must be approved by City Council, which provides for the allocation of the 55 units from the Hotel Density Reserve. The Development Agreement provides for the mandatory evacuation/closure of the hotel in the event of the posting of a hurricane watch including Clearwater Beach by the National Hurricane Center, which also complies with Beach by Design criteria. It also complies with the Beach by Design criteria that access to all rooms be through a lobby and internal corridors. The subject development proposal is located in the Old Florida character district established in Beach by Design. Beach by Design supports the development of new overnight accommodations and attached dwellings throughout the District with limited retail /commercial and mixed use development fronting on Mandalay Avenue between Bay Esplanade and Somerset Street. The proposed overnight accommodation hotel is such a proposal which is consistent with the vision for the district. The development of a mid -priced hotel on the subject property is also consistent with surrounding development in this character district. Community Development Code (CDC) Section 4 -303 specifies that an application for a building permit must be submitted within one year of the date of the signed Development Order approves the project, unless otherwise specified under this approval. The applicant has requested a two - year Development Order as a part of the approval of this development proposal for which the FLS2013 -02006 Page 2 Clewwater Level I Flexible Standard Development Application Review PLANNING DEVELOPMENT p pP DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION applicant will have two -years from the date of the signed Development Order to submit for building permits. Density: Pursuant to the Countywide Future Land Use Plan and CDC Section 2- 801.1, the maximum density for properties with a designation of Resort Facilities High is 50 overnight accommodation units per acre. The subject property consists of five separate lots that combined have 41,232 square feet of lot area (0.95 acres) zoned Tourist District, and a maximum of 47 overnight accommodation units are permissible under current regulations. The proposal requests 55 hotel rooms from the Hotel Density Reserve, adopted as an amendment to Beach by Design under Ordinance 7925 -08. The overall density for this project is 107.7 overnight accommodation units /rooms per acre, which is below the maximum of 150 units per acre established in Beach by Design for projects that have acquired units from the Hotel Density Reserve. Impervious Surface Ratio (ISR): Pursuant to CDC Section 2- 801.1, the maximum allowable I.S.R. is 0.95. The proposed I.S.R. is 0.69, which is consistent with the Code provisions. Minimum Lot Area and Width: Pursuant to CDC Table 2 -802, the minimum lot area for overnight accommodations shall be 20,000 square feet. The proposed subject property will consist of 41,232 square feet of lot area. Pursuant to the same Table, the minimum lot width for overnight accommodations can range between 100 — 150 feet. The subject property has a lot width of 104 feet along Bay Esplanade (north and south right -of -way); a lot width of 289.98 feet along Bay Esplanade (east and west right -of -way) and 182.06 feet along Poinsettia Avenue. The proposed subject property complies with the lot width and area standards established for overnight accommodation uses. Nevertheless, it shall be a condition of approval that the applicant shall record a Unity of Title for lots 05/29/15/54756/082 /0010; 05/29/15/54756/082 /0020; 05/29/15/54756/082 /0110; 05/29/15/54756/082 /0120; and 05/29/15/54756/082/0130. Minimum Off - Street Parking: Pursuant to CDC Table 2 -802, the minimum required parking for overnight accommodations is 1.2 parking spaces per unit, or a minimum of 122 parking spaces for the proposed hotel with 102 hotel rooms. The proposal includes a parking garage as a part of the first three levels of the hotel with 131 parking spaces. The proposal is compliant with this Code provision. The proposal includes 4,650 square feet of amenities (breakfast area, meeting rooms and fitness center) located in the hotel. Code requires additional parking spaces if interior accessory uses square footage exceeds fifteen percent of the overall gross floor area of the building (64,125 square feet). The square footage of the interior amenities is less than fifteen percent of the overall gross floor area of the hotel; therefore, as set forth in CDC Section 2- 803.I.11, no additional parking spaces are necessary. Special Area Plan: Beach by Design: Old Florida District The City has demonstrated through the creation of Beach by Design and subsequent amendments to the plan that it recognizes the need for pedestrian- and boater - friendly development in order to FLS2013 -02006 Page 3 r 4f4�' p +py. A,L ua1Wate Level I Flexible Standard Development Application Review DEVELOPMENT TDEVELOPMENT P pp DEVELOPMENT REVIEWD]VISIDN create a vibrant active waterfront serving tourists and locals alike. It is understood that a broad range of uses including attached dwellings, retail sales and service, hotels and motels and restaurants contribute to the creation of the unique character and atmosphere that is Clearwater Beach. Specifically, the vision of the Old Florida District of Beach by Design provides for the development of attached dwellings and overnight accommodations. The District is envisioned to remain a transitional District between the single - family neighborhood north of the Acacia roundabout and the more intense tourist/resort-type uses with make up the bulk of the development on Clearwater Beach farther to the south. The Old Florida District also provides a set of development parameters addressing building height, minimum setbacks, required building stepbacks, landscape buffers and parking/vehicular access. These development parameters supersede any conflicting statements contained within the Design Guidelines of Beach by Design and the Community Development Code. Furthermore, the Design Guidelines of Beach by Design provide that "Any issue not addressed in [the] Design Guidelines shall be governed by the requirements of the Community Development Code." , Therefore, the hierarchy of applicability is as follows: • The parameters contained with the Old Florida District supersede the requirements of the Design Guidelines within Beach by Design and the Community Development Code. • The Design Guidelines supersede the requirements of the Community Development Code. • The Community Development Code is applicable to development within the Old Florida District when not in conflict with either the development parameters of the Old Florida District and /or the Design Guidelines of Beach by Design. Maximum Building Hei hg_t: The Old Florida District of Beach by Design, allows for overnight accommodations to be located ontthe south side of Somerset Street and 60 feet or more south of the southerly right -of -way line of Somerset Street a maximum building height of 75 feet. The rp subject property is approximately 258 feet from south line of Somerset Street. The proposed building is 75 eet in height from Base Flood Elevation (BFE) to the mid -point of the decorative roof structure which is the maximum height allowed for overnight accommodations in the Old Florida District in Beach by Design. The building elevation plans show an overall building height of 78.4 feet. The Code makes allowances for elevator rooms to project sixteen feet above the maximum height limit of the zoning district. The maximum height allowed is 75 feet, additional sixteen feet allows for the elevator room to a height of 91 feet. Minimum Setbacks: Old Florida District of Beach by Design states that the minimum front setback for overnight accommodations shall be 15 feet and the minimum side setback shall be 10 feet. The submitted site plan shows that the building will have a front (south) setback of 15 feet (to building); front (west) setback of 18 feet (to balcony) and 23 feet; and side (north) setback of 10 feet will be met. The submitted site plan shows a front (east) setback of 13.1 feet to building where 15 feet is required. Section 4.a.(1) of the Old Florida District allows for a maximum reduction of five (5) feet from any required setback if the decreased setback results in an improved site plan, landscaping areas in excess of the minimum required and /or improved design and appearance.. FLS2013 -02006 Page 4 V c#41- CuJr�r �c=. -• Level I Flexible Standard Development Application Review PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT .._.. ......... ........._.- ...__DEVELRPIJTRF�f W SIG The two foot side setback reduction on the east allows for the building to have a twenty -three foot front (west) setback on the west because the increased setback of twenty -three feet eliminates the requirement that a sixteen foot wide stepback be provided on the west fagade by decreasing the sixteen foot stepback at a rate of two feet per stepback per one foot in setback or a twenty -three foot setback. This twenty -three foot setback allows the building to have a height of 75 feet to decorative roof structure. The height allows the building to have a decorative roof structure on the primary tower on the western wing of the building that includes architectural elements such as arched windows facing south and west towards Bay Esplanade and Poinsettia Street, railings on each balcony, and red roof tile decorative roof structures at different heights on each building elevation in the Florida vernacular style as set forth in Beach by Design. Such increase in the setback improves the design and appearance of the building. However, at this time, the side (west) setback shows balconies encroaching five feet into the required setback. The balcony widths will have to be reduced to 24 inches to comply with code or the applicant will need to request a setback reduction and /or provide a stepback along the west fagade. Section 4.a.(2) allows for the reduction in setback if the setback does not impair access to mechanical features that a minimum five (5) foot unobstructed access must be provided along the entire side setback of properties. The reduced setback does not restrict access to any mechanical equipment and each side of the building will have a five foot unobstructed access as required by the guidelines; and Section 4.a.(3) allows setbacks to be decreased at a rate of one (1) foot in required setback per two (2) feet in additional required stepback. As discussed above, the required stepback width on the east building elevation is sixteen feet; the building elevations plans show that a stepback with a width of 37.5 feet at a building height of 33.6 feet on east elevation. Based on the guideline the two foot reduction in the stepback requires an additional four feet in width to 20 feet. The east side stepback will be 37.5 feet wide which complies with the guideline. In regards to the side (north) setback, the request includes a side (north) setback of eight feet to balconies as well as a side (north) setback of 10 feet to building. CDC Section 3 -908, allows balconies that linearly extend 50 percent or less of the width of the building wall to which they are attached shall be permitted to extend into a required setback area not more than 24 inches provided through access is not obstructed. The balconies shown on the plan to extend 24 inches within the ten foot side setback only comprise of 22 percent (60 linear feet) of the building wall to which they are attached which is 265 feet. The extension of balconies 24 inches into the required two foot side setback comply with code. Minimum Stepbacks: Old Florida District requires a proposed building which fronts on a right - of -way with a width between 46 and 66 feet, the stepback height ratio shall be one foot for every two and one -half feet in building height above 35 feet. Both Bay Esplanade and Poinsettia Avenue are 60 feet in width; therefore with a building height of 75 feet, a minimum of a 16 foot stepback at 35 foot height dimension (from BFE) is required on the south, west, and east building elevations. Building stepback means the horizontal shifting of the building massing towards the center. b FLS2013 -02006 V Page 5 dlt� (2 �, V�l�til ate Level I Flexible Standard Development Application Review PLnrrNrNG& DEVELOPMENT p pP DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION As set forth in Old Florida District 3.b and 3.c, the building requires a sixteen foot stepback the on the south building elevation. The site plan and building elevations show an 18.6 foot stepback will be provided at a height of 22 feet on the eastern wing of the building along the south building fagade as required by Beach by Design. In addition, a twenty -three foot setback is provided to the building on the western side of the property rather than a sixteen foot wide stepback. Due to the unique shape of the lot and the footprint of west end of the building in relation to the property lines, the applicant is able to provide an increased setback of 23 feet to the primary tower on the southwest portion of the property. The increased setback eliminates the need for a sixteen foot stepback only along this part of the building. The site plan and building elevations also show that increased stepback width of 18.6 foot rather than the required sixteen foot wide stepback will be provided along the remainder of the south building elevation. Staff supports the increased setback and stepback as it is a solution that complies with the guidelines and provides an enhanced site and building design with greater setbacks and stepbacks that is encouraged in the Old Florida District in Beach by Design. As set forth in Old Florida District 3.d, the building requires a stepback of 16 feet on the east facades of the building. As previously discussed, the east building elevation shows that a 37.5 stepback will be provided at a height of 33.6 feet (from BFE) on the east building fagade as required by Beach by Design. As set forth in Old Florida District 3.d, the building requires a stepback of 16 feet on the west facades of the building. The site plan and building elevation show that no stepback will be required; rather, the applicant has eliminated the required stepback by provided a setback of 23 feet by decreasing the rate of two feet in stepback by adding one foot in additional setback as allowed in Beach by Design. The building and elevation plans show a covered structure for a tiki bar in the 16 foot stepback on the east building elevation. The covered structure shall be removed or relocated outside the stepback requirement. Staff also has concerns regarding the placement of the tiki bar on the north side of the terrace and at the building height of the adjacent residential building. Outdoor music and hours of operation may affect adjacent property owners. Staff recommends that the tiki bar be shifted to the south side of the terrace. Mechanical Equipment: Pursuant to CDC Section 3- 201.D.1, all outside mechanical equipment must be screened so as not to be visible from public streets and/or abutting properties. The site plan does not show the locations of any outdoor mechanical equipment. If additional equipment is added later, it will be reviewed at the time of submission for a building permit. The screening of mechanical equipment shall comply with this Code provision. Sight Visibility Triangles: Pursuant to CDC Section 3- 904.A, to minimize hazards at the proposed driveways on Bay Esplanade and Poinsettia Avenue, no structures or landscaping may be installed which will obstruct views at a level between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade within 20 -foot sight visibility triangles. No sight visibility triangles have been provided on the site plan. Traffic Engineering will require that site triangles be shown on plan prior to Development Order. FLS2013 -02006 Page 6 Level I Flexible Standard Development Application Review PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT P pP DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION The encroachments shall be reviewed by the City's Traffic Engineering Department and be determined to be acceptable. Utilities: Pursuant to CDC Section 3 -911, for development that does not involve a subdivision, all utilities including individual distribution lines must be installed underground unless such undergrounding is not practicable. Landscaping_ Pursuant Old Florida District a ten foot landscape buffer is required along all street frontages; also pursuant to CDC Section 3- 1202.E.2, foundation plantings shall be provided for 100 percent of a building facade with frontage along a street right -of -way, excluding space necessary for building ingress and egress, within a minimum five -foot wide landscaped area. The landscape plan shows that the ten foot landscape buffer will be provided on all three fronts of the property as required. The landscape plan includes a wide variety of ornamental and palm trees (phoenix palms, pinapple guava trees, washingtonian palm, silver trumpet and sabal palm) and shrubs and ground covers (coontie, shore juniper, bird of paradise, dwarf indian hawthorn, hibiscus, pink mulhy and beauty natal plum). The buffers will be planted in such a manner as to create a lush tiered effect providing adequate buffers between the subject property and adjacent rights -of -way and properties. The proposed landscaping will complement the Old Florida vernacular style architectural elements of the hotel building and complement landscaping in place on adjacent and nearby properties maintaining and enhancing quality of landscaping in the Old Florida District. Solid Waste: An interior trash room that will be accessed from Poinsettia Avenue will be provided on the front (west) building facade. The proposal has been found to be acceptable by the City's Solid Waste Department. Signage: No signage is being reviewed as a part of this development application. Any proposed signage shall be reviewed by Staff to ensure the signs comply with Code requirements through a separate sign permit or be reviewed through a Comprehensive Sign Program application. Additional Beach by Design Guidelines: Section B.3. requires that the floorplate of any portion of the building that is between forty -five feet and one hundred feet in height will be no greater than 25,000 square feet except for structures open the public. The proposed building height is 75 feet. Based on submitted building plans no floorplate over 45 feet in height will exceed 25,000 square feet. Section C.1 requires buildings with a footprint of greater than 5,000 square feet to be constructed so that no more than two of the three building dimensions in the vertical or horizontal planes are equal in length. The proposed building footprint is approximately 29,332 square feet. The project's overall horizontal plane dimensions are approximately 84 feet (east facade) along Bay Esplanade; 260 feet (south facade) along Bay Esplanade; and 121 feet (west facade) along Poinsettia Avenue, while the vertical plane is approximately 75 feet from base flood elevation to the flat roof. None of these dimensions are equal. FLS2013 -02006 Page 7 0 u Level I Flexible Standard Development Application Review PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION Section C.2 requires no plane or elevation to continue uninterrupted for greater than 100 feet without an offset of more than five feet. All facades of the building greater than 100 feet in length include a minimum of one vertical stepback per fagade to be consistent with the aforementioned provision. Section C.3 requires at least 60 percent of any elevation to be covered with windows or architectural decoration. The applicant has calculated the total square footage shown in the following table: Exterior Finishes and Openings Percentages Table Building Elevation Total square footage shown on elevation Total square footage of Architectural Decoration/Balconies/Windows Percentage of Elevation as Architectural Decoration Balconies/Windows North 19,130 11,616 60% East 8,946 5,689 63% South 18,962 12,130 63% West 8,976 6,015 67% The above table outlines the percentages which are consistent with the aforementioned provision. Section CA states that no more than 75 percent of the theoretical maximum building envelope located above forty -five feet will be occupied for the proposed building. In addition, the parcel must be less than 2.0 acres and obtain rooms from the Hotel Density Reserve. The applicant provided a calculation that showed that the maximum building envelope above forty -five feet of the hotel will be 45.02 percent, less than the allowable 70 percent as set forth in the Beach by Design. E.3. Beach by Design requires an aesthetically inviting an easily identified entrance. The submitted site plan shows a pronounced stairway leading to the primary entrance. Staff shall also require an awning above the primary entrance to create an easily identified entrance. The materials of the stairway are to be constructed pavers patterned or distressed which distinguished it from other suburban concrete sidewalks. It shall be a condition of approval that prior to any building permits the stairway on the site plan shall be shown to be constructed of pavers patterned or distressed as required in Beach by Design. Section L.l requires finish materials and building colors to reflect Florida or coastal vernacular themes. The colors (pale moon and hint of mauve) of the building support the tropical modern architecture in Beach by Design. The applicants have also included architectural elements such as arched windows and openings along the ground level south fagade as well as on the sixth level on the primary tower facing south and west towards Bay Esplanade and Poinsettia Street, railings on each balcony, and red roof tile decorative roof structures at different heights on each building elevation in the Florida vernacular style as set forth in Beach by Design. Section L.1, in regards to color and finish materials, it is stated in the application material that a flag hotel has not been obtained which means the proposed finished material and color scheme may change if a national flag hotel chain is acquired; therefore it shall be a condition of approval FLS2013 -02006 Page 8 '''�11�ar atc Level I Flexible Standard Development Application Review PLANNING DEVELOPMENT P pP DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION that any change to the approved colors and/or finished materials shall be submitted to and approved by Staff. Section L.2., The submitted site plan indicates that the proposed sidewalks will be of concrete materials. Sidewalks are to be constructed pavers patterned or distressed which distinguished it from other suburban concrete sidewalks. It shall be a condition of approval that prior to any building permits the sidewalks on the site plan shall be shown to be constructed of pavers patterned or distressed as required in Beach by Design. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the standards as per CDC Section 2 -801.1 and Table 2 -802 and Beach by Design; FLS2013 -02006 Page 9 Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent Density 50 units /rooms per acre 102 units /rooms (107.7 units room X (max. of 40 per acre: requesting 55 rooms units /rooms) through Beach by Design Hotel Density Reserve) Impervious Surface Ratio 0.95 0.70 X Minimum Lot Area 20,000 square feet 41,232 square feet X Minimum Lot Width Front: 100 -150 feet 104 feet (east/along Bay Esplanade) X 289.98 (south/along Bay Esplanade) 182.06 (west/along Poinsettia Ave.) Minimum Setbacks (set Front : 15 feet West: 23 feet (to building) X forth in Old Florida District South: 15 feet (to building) X of Beach by Design) East: 13.1 feet (to building) X Side: 10 feet North: 8 feet (to balconies) X 10 feet (to building) Maximum Height (set forth 75 feet from BFE 75 feet (from BFE to mid -point of X in Old Florida District of through Beach by decorative roof structure) and 78.4 Beach by Design) Design feet (to top of elevator room) Minimum 1.2 per unit (122 131 parking spaces provided X Off - Street Parking required) FLS2013 -02006 Page 9 Level I Flexible Standard Development Application Review PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per CDC Section 2- 802.C: i See discussion below FLS2013 -02006 Page 10 Consistent Inconsistent With the exception of those properties located on Clearwater Beach; the parcel X proposed for development shall front on but shall not involve direct access to a major arterial street unless no other means of access would be possible Height: The increased height results in an improved site plan and/or improved design X and appearance Signs: No sign of any kind is designed or located so that any portion of the sign is X more than six feet above the finished grade of the front lot line of the parcel proposed for development unless such signage is a part of an approved Comprehensive Sign Program Front setback – 15 feet as set forth in Beach by Design but allowed a maximum X reduction to five feet with improved site design and appearance. Side and rear setbacks –10 foot side setback set forth in Beach by Design X The design of all buildings shall comply with the Tourist District site and X architectural design guidelines in Section 3 -501, as applicable Lot width: The reduced lot width shall not result in a building which is out of scale X with existing buildings in the immediate vicinity The parcel proposed for development shall, if located within the Coastal Storm Area, X have a hurricane evacuation plan requiring the use close when a hurricane watch is posted. A development agreement must be approved by the city council.pursuant to X F.S. 163.3221-163.3243 and Community Development Code Section 4 -606 if the development proposal exceeds the base density and /or base F.A.R. established for the underlying Future Land Use designation Accessory uses: X a. Accessory uses must be incidental, subordinate, and customarily accessory to overnight accommodations; b. The maximum floor area for accessory uses located within the building interior shall be limited to ten percent of the gross floor area of the development; c. Signage for any accessory use shall be subordinate to and incorporated into the primary freestanding sip nage for the ovemight accommodation use. In no case shall more than 25 percent of the sign area be dedicated to the accessory uses; d. Those developments that have obtained additional density from the Destination Resort Density Pool established in Beach by Design are not subject to the requirements set forth in Sections 2- 802.K.I O.a—c; e. Overnight accommodations with fewer than 50 rooms that have a full service restaurant shall comply with the parking standards for the restaurant use as contained in Table 2 -802. The lowest number of spaces allowed shall be used to calculate the additional amount of off - street parking required for the project. i See discussion below FLS2013 -02006 Page 10 Level I Flexible Standard Development Application Review PLANNING T DEVELOPMENT p pp DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL ONE APPROVALS: The following table depicts the consistency of the overnight accommodation use with the General Standards for Level One Approvals as per Section 3- 914.A., CDC: FLS2013 -02006 Page 11 Consistent Inconsistent 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. FLS2013 -02006 Page 11 } Clearwater Level I Flexible Standard Development Application Review PLANNING DEVELOPMENT p pp DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meeting of June 6, 2013 and recommended approval of the development proposal to the Community Development Coordinator, based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: Findings of Fact The Planning Department, having reviewed all evidence submitted by the applicant and requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact: 1. The 0.95 acre subject property is located on the northeast corner of the Poinsettia Avenue and Bay Esplanade intersection; 2. The subject property is currently five vacant lots that will be tied together under a Unity of Title; 3. That the subject property is located in the Tourist (T) District and the Resort High Facilities (RFH) future land use plan category; 4. That the subject property is located in the Old Florida District of Beach by Design and is subject to all applicable requirements set forth therein; 5. That the subject property has lot widths of 104 feet along Bay Esplanade (east), 289.98 feet along Bay Esplanade (south), and 182.06 feet along Poinsettia Avenue (west); 6. That the subject property will be 41,232 square feet in lot area: 7. The proposal is to construct a mid - priced 102 -unit overnight accommodation use at a density of 107.7 units /acre, which includes the allocation of 55 units from the Hotel Density Reserve under Beach by Design; 8. A companion Development Agreement (DVA2013- 02001) that must be approved by City Council is also on this CDB agenda, provides for the allocation of the 55 units from the Hotel Density Reserve; 9. The hotel is proposed at a height of 75 feet from the Base Flood Elevation (BFE) to the mid- point of decorative roof structure; 10. That the subject property is located on the south side of Somerset Street and is more than 60 feet south of the southerly right -of -way line of Somerset Street will allows for the hotel a height of 75 feet where a maximum of 75 feet in height is permitted; 11. That the building will have a front (east) setback of 13 feet (to building), a reduction of two feet to allow for an improved design and appearance as set forth in Old Florida District in Beach by Design; 12. That the two foot reduction to the front (east) setback is allowed as it will result in an increased width east building facade stepback of 37.5 feet where a 20 foot wide stepback is required as set forth in forth in Old Florida District in Beach by Design; 13. That the building a front (south) setback of 15 feet (to building) as set forth in Old Florida District in Beach by Design; 14. That the building will have a front (west) setback of 23 feet (to building); 15. That the building a side (north) setback of 10 feet (to building) as set forth in Old Florida District in Beach by Design; 16. That the request includes a side (north) setback of eight feet (to balconies). CDC Section 3- 908, allows balconies that linearly extend 50 percent or less of the width of the building wall to which they are attached shall be permitted to extend into a required setback area not more FLS2013 -02006 Page 12 ale: Level I Flexible Standard Development Application Review PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION than 24 inches provided through access is not obstructed. The balconies shown on the plan to extend 24 inches within the ten foot side setback only comprise of 22 percent (60 linear feet) of the building wall to which they are attached which is 265 feet; 17. The balconies on the front (west) building facade encroach five feet into the required 23 foot setback; 18. That the proposed building will have a stepback of 18.6 foot wide stepback on the eastern wing along the south side of the building where a 16 foot stepback is required by Beach by Design; 19. That the western wing of the front (south) facade will have an increased setback of 23 feet to the to building The increased setback eliminates the need for a sixteen foot wide stepback as it permissible to allow a decrease in stepback at a rate of two feet in stepback per one foot in additional require setback as set forth in Beach by Design which complies with the guidelines and provides an enhanced site and building design with greater setbacks and stepbacks that is encouraged in the Old Florida District in Beach by Design; 20. That the hotels floorplates between forty -five feet and one hundred feet will be less than 25,000 square feet as set forth in Beach by Design guidelines; 21. That no more than two of three building dimensions of the hotel in the vertical or horizontal planes are equal in length as set forth in Beach by Design guidelines; 22. That all of the hotels facades greater than 100 feet in length include one vertical stepback per facade as set forth in Beach by Design guidelines; 23. That the maximum building envelope above forty -five feet of the hotel will be 28.7 percent, less than the allowable 70 percent as set forth in the Beach by Design guidelines; 24. That a portion of the first three levels of the hotel will consist of a parking garage with a total of 131 parking spaces on site with two driveways onto Bay Esplanade; 25. That the maximum allowable I.S.R. is 0.95. The proposed I.S.R. is 0.69;and 26. There is no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Conclusions of Law The Planning and Development Department, having made the above findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Community Development Code Tables 2 -801.1 and 2 -802; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Community Development Code Section 2- 802.C; 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level One Approvals as per Community Development Code Section 3- 914.A; 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the Old Florida character district of Beach by Design; and 5. That the development proposal is consistent with the Design Guidelines of Beach by Design. Based upon the above, the Planning and Development Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Standard Development application to permit a 102 -room overnight accommodation use in the Tourist (T) District with a lot area of 41,232 square feet (0.95 acres), lot widths of 104 feet along Bay Esplanade (east); 289.98 feet along Bay Esplanade (south) and 182.06 feet along Poinsettia Avenue (west); a front (east) setback of 13 feet (to building); a front (south) setback of 15 feet (to building); a front (west) setback of 23 feet (to building); a side (north) setback of eight feet (to balconies) and ten feet (to building); a building height of 75 feet (from Base Flood Elevation to mid -point of decorative roof FLS2013 -02006 Page 13 0 'J Level I Flexible Standard Development Application Review PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION structure); 131 off - street parking spaces; and a request for a two -year Development Order rather than a one -year Development Order, pursuant to the Community Development Code Section 2- 802.M, Section 4 -303 and the requirements of the Old Florida District of Beach by Design; and an increase in the maximum density through the allocation of 55 overnight accommodation units from the Hotel Density Reserve created pursuant to Beach by Design, as well as an increase in the percentage of palm trees to 100 percent where 75 percent is allowable, as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program, pursuant to the Community Development Code Section 3- 1202.G., pursuant to the Community Development Code Section 3- 1202.G., subject to the following conditions of approval: Conditions of Approval: 1. That approval of this Flexible Standard Development case is subject to the approval of a Development Agreement with the City (Case DVA2013- 02001); 2. That the development proposal shall be granted a two -year Development Order effective from the date the Development Order is issued by the Community Development Coordinator; 3. That prior to the issuance of any building permit, parcels 05/29/15/54756/082 /0010; 05/29/15/54756/082 /0020; 05/29/15/54756/082 /0110; 05/29/15/54756/082 /0120, and 05/29/15/54756/082 /0130 shall be tied together under a Unity of Title; 4. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the elevations approved by the Development Review Committee; 5. That any change to the approved colors and /or finished materials shall be submitted to and approved by Staff; 6. That prior to the issuance of Development Order, that visibility site triangles be reviewed and approved by Traffic Engineering; 7. That prior to any building permits, the site plan shall be revised to show the stairway leading towards the primary entrance of the hotel to be constructed of pavers patterned or distressed as required in Beach by Design; 8. The balconies on the front (west) building fagade shall be reduced to 24 inches in width or the applicant will need to request a five foot setback reduction which will result in a requires ten foot stepback; 9. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, the sidewalks on the site plan shall be shown and noted to be constructed of pavers patterned or distressed as required in Beach by Design; 10. That any future attached or freestanding signage must be monument -style meeting Code requirements and be designed to match exterior materials and color of the building. Any proposed signage for the hotel shall be reviewed and approved by Staff through a separate sign permit; 11. That all landscaping plants and trees shall be Florida Grade #1 plant material with an automatic irrigation system; 12. That the prior to the issuance of any building permit, a public right -of -way permit shall be obtained for any work in the public right -of -way; 13. That the books and records pertaining to use of each hotel room be open for inspection by authorized representatives of the City, upon reasonable notice, in order to confirm compliance with the Hotel Density Reserve criteria of Beach by Design as allowed by general law; 14. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a hurricane evacuation plan for the hotel be submitted and approved by the City for all Guests; FLS2013 -02006 Page 14 Level I Flexible Standard Development Application Review PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION 15. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, the location and visibility of electric equipment (electric panels, boxes and meters) be reviewed and, if located exterior to the building where visible from any street frontage, be painted the same color as the portion of the building to which such features are attached; 16. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, any applicable Public Art and Design Impact Fee be paid; 17. That prior to the issuance of any building permits all Parks and Recreation fees be paid; 18. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, all requirements of General Engineering, Stormwater Engineering, and Traffic Engineering shall be addressed; 19. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, all comments from the Fire Department shall be addressed; 20. That prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, all utilities, including individual distribution lines serving this development within the right -of -way along Poinsettia Avenue and Bay Esplanade, as applicable, must be installed underground unless undergrounding is not practicable; and 21. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, the Fire Department may require the provision of a Water Study performed by a Fire Protection Engineer in order to ensure that an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of the project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and /or fire pump. If a fire pump is required, then the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Prepared by Planning and Development Department Staff. ATTACHMENTS: Photographs of Site and Vicinity FLS2013 -02006 Page 15 Kevin W. Nurnberger, Planner III Istvan: This is what I recall from discussions to reach the approved plan. The approved building height was 75 feet to mid -point of pitched roof. All the calculations for the design of the building started from that height. The Old Florida District requires a proposed building which fronts on a right -of -way with a width between 46 and 66 feet, the stepback height ratio shall be one foot for every two and one -half feet in building height above 35 feet. Both Bay Esplanade and Poinsettia Avenue are 60 feet in width; therefore with a building height of 75 feet, a minimum of a 16 foot stepback at 35 foot height dimension (from BFE) was required on the south, west, and east building elevations. The increased setback on west side to 23 feet eliminated the required 16 foot stepback. The reduced setback of 13.1 feet on the east front increased the width of the east stepback from 16 feet to 20 feet. Is the east front setback now 14.3 feet? If so that foot reduction requires an 18 foot stepback on east side. You're not showing a stepback dimension on east front. In addition, the justification for the reduced east setback was it compensated for the increased west setback. The reduced setback allowed for a building height of 75 feet on the west side which improved the building design by adding the decorative roof and a tower with the large arched windows on the south and west facades of tower now no longer in design. Your showing a 28.3 front south stepback where 18 foot stepback was approved however you do not get a reduction in stepback on east front if you increase a stepback on the south front. Also if the new east front stepback is 14.3 feet as shown on plan what is the structure that is shown under the actual 14.3 foot dimension? It looks like a parking space or outdoor pad? What is the new actual height to mid -point of pitched roof? Use approved plan as example. I assume the new height of 78.10 feet to mid -point of pitched roof is actually to mechanical equipment because there are elevators, if not your building is too high. Max height for hotel in Old Florida is 75 feet. You cannot get anymore height to building only 16 feet more may be allowed for mechanical equipment. Show the 75 foot height at pitched roof and make all calculations from there based on width of street if it all complies with the development standards you may be okay — if not it may have to get reviewed again same as before. You may have to request a maximum reduction of 5 feet from the east stepback. My comment regarding the window screens in garage was meant for south elevation — the north and south elevations were /are both labeled north elevation (fix it) but you state your preference is to reduce decorations on north side. The decorative percentages calculations are still the ones you provided the other day? No fagade shall be below 60 percent. 1� Nurnberger, Kevin From: Shannon, Jennifer Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 3:57 PM To: Nurnberger, Kevin Subject: 650 Bay Esplanade —D.O. Condition for Traffic Engineering As per the City's Community Development Code, Section 3-904, there shall be no objects in the sight triangle which do not meet the City's acceptable vertical height criteria at a level between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade. As the building was allowed to be constructed with a 13 foot setback from the property lines, the building is located in the sight triangle and this construction will be allowed in the sight triangle. Please note this comment in the D0. Thanks. Jennifer aA - Map Request Planner Name: Kevin W. Nurnberger Case Number: DVA2013 -02001 Date Requested: February 6, 2013 Date Requested for (date): February 20, 2013 Maps Requested ® Location Map ® Aerial Map ® Zoning Map ® Existing Surrounding Uses Map Required Documents to be submitted to Engineering ® Legal Description L..EG ?AL WT?-Fp A-TP -L A� (?ct ® Survey ® Map with Proposed Site Highlighted IN ADDITION TO THE REQUESTED MAPS, PLEASE PROVIDE VERIFICATION THAT THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION WE HAVE PROVIDED IS CORRR AND AC R E. Thomas Mahony PSM, Geographic Technology Manage i nature Map Name Owner: Bay Esplanade Project, LLC `"Pr— Case: DVA2013 -02001 (overnight - accomodation) Site: 650 Bay Esplanade /-- Property Size: .95 acres (41,232 sq. ft.) PIN: 05/29/15/54756/082 /0010 05/29/15/54756/082 /0020 Atlas Page: 258A 05/29/15/24756/082 /0110 05/29/15/54756/082 /0120 05/29/15/54756/082 /0130 X- y a Tr lz_ ,fir - '�'� �--- �-� -�`� ,- •� R b 7 � SOUND J1'l _, l rV 11 r • ti low 0 ` � , i n * ,. ..: e J <ll� %l r�l % %l�/ � � � • � �� y w AERIAL MAP Owner: Bay Esplanade Project, LLC j Case Site: 650 Bay Esplanade PIN: 05/29/15/54756/082 /0010 05/29/15/54756/082 /0020 05/29/15/24756/082 /0110 05/29/15/54756/082 /0120 05/29/15/54756/082 /0130 O X L>r W 3 a U DVA2013 -02001 (overnight accomodation) Property Size: .95 acres (41,232 sq. ft.) Atlas Page: 258A 869 675 a 2 �c 11 P 692 693 672 SOMERSET ST 658 z 654 655 650 T 648 s4o 643 670 668 v� ° D '� 689 ° 2 z 638 664 665 668 y 687 660 664 r- D 685 Z D v 658 661 661 m 673 654 655 M 650 669 � A A � � 644 66> 640 rn rn ss� 628 P x ROYAL WAY m T OC 631 f6 Z 629 1634 6A� Ct W 619 �9 622 °ry g2 620 W 622 Ix 618 Q W 614 �. 611 J Q 610 Q OS/R ° 612 621 610 U Z 605 606 OS /R 609 617 608 m QQ N C ! 605 605 611 603 606 607 604 600 m 602 622ELCBX 585 584 , 0 JUANiTA WAY 584 583 581 599 ZONING MAP Owner: Bay Esplanade Project, LLC Case: DVA2013 -02001 (overnight accomodation) Site: 650 Bay Esplanade Property Size: .95 acres (41,232 sq. ft.) PIN: 05/29/15/54756/082 /0010 Atlas Page: 258A 05/29/15/54756/082 /0020 05/29/15/24756/082 /0110 05/29/15/54756/082 /0120 05/29/15/54756/082 /0130 869 v 672 662 657 658 654 655 650 T 648 s4o 643 639 638 It z w GH- N�P ON Q . m IRIS Z Q m ASTER Q ❑ ACACIA ST V ❑❑ PROJECT SOMERSET ST SITE Z N CAMBRIA W O O IDLEWILD GLE�ND�ALE ROYAL AY NPRg R \� �❑ HEILWOOD mO 4' �V v ❑❑ BAY Q Q AVALON N ❑❑ w -< KENDALL Juanita Z C A o z �' 0 F-1 a v t� BAY ESPLANADE m P N� W ROCKAWAY SW Ambler BAYMONT ST LOCATION MAP Owner: Bay Esplanade Project, LLC Case: DVA2013 -02001 (overnight accomodation) Site: 650 Bay Esplanade Property Size: .95 acres (41,232 sq. ft.) PIN: 05/29/15/54756/082 /0010 Atlas Page: 258A 05/29/15/54756/082 /0020 05/29/15/24756/082 /0110 05/29/15/54756/082 /0120 05/29/15/54756/082/0130 �jfrrrr >�. CITY OF CLEARWATER PLLNNING & DfwioPMrlvT DEPA'RTMLNT re _ 00 POST Oirrre Box 4748 CL�nxwnTrx, FLOx�DA 33758 !k748 Mfrvicrraf. SERvicos BufmiNG, 100 SOUTH MiKru AVENUE, CLEAR,,rATER, FlORII)a 33 756 + ATER ,If� TELEPHONE (727) 5624567 Fax ( 727) 5624865 May 17, 2013 RE: NOTICE OF FILING AN APPLICATION FOR FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AT 650 BAY ESPLANADE (FLS2013- 02006); OWNED BY: BAY ESPLANADE PROJECT LLC To Surrounding Property Owners: As a property owner within 500 feet of 650 BAY ESPLANADE, the City of Clearwater Planning and Development Department gives notice that an application has been submitted for Flexible Standard Development application to permit a 102 -room overnight accommodation use in the Tourist (T) District with a lot area of 41,232 square feet (0.95 acres), lot widths of 104 feet along Bay Esplanade (east); 289.98 feet along Bay Esplanade (south) and 182.06 feet along Poinsettia Avenue (west); a front (east) setback of 13.1 feet (to building); front (south) setback of 15 feet (to building); front (west) setbacks of 18 feet (to balconies) and 23 feet (to building); a side (north) setback of eight feet (to balconies) and ten feet (to building); a building height of 75 feet (from Base Flood Elevation to mid -point of decorative roof -`structure); 131. off- street parking spaces; and a request for a two-year Development Order, pursuant to the Community Development Code Section 2- 802.M, Section 4 -303 and the requirements of the Old Florida District of Beach by Design; and an increase in the maximum density through the allocation of 55 overnight accommodation units from the Hotel Density Reserve created pursuant to Beach by Design, as well as an increase in the percentage of palm trees to 100 percent where 75 percent is allowable, as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program, pursuant to the Community Development Code Section 3- 1202.G. On June 6, 2013, the Development Review Committee (composed of the City's professional staff) will review and determine whether the application demonstates compliance with the City's Community Development Code. Following that review and determination, the Planning Director will issue a Development Order approving, approving with conditions, or denying the application. The earliest date that the City will make a decision on the application will be June 6, 2013. The City encourages you to participate in the review of this application. You may contact me at 562- 4567x2502 or via email at Kevin .Nurnberger @myclearwater.com for further information, visit our office to review the files and /or submit written comments to be considered in the City review of the application. Please be advised that the applicant may submit additional or new information regarding this case which you may review during regular business hours. However, no further notice will be provided to you should the application be amended. An appeal of the decision of the Planning Director may be initiated by the applicant or property owners within the required notice area who present competent substantial evidence at, or prior to, the Development Review Committee meeting on June 6, 2013. An appeal must be filed, including an appeal fee, with the City Clerks Office within seven days of the issuance of the Development Order. Thank you for your interest in the City of Clearwater's development review process. You may access the Planning and.Development Department through the City's website: www.m.yclearwater.com. SiEfce y yours; 5/17/2013 gene Cf_Nolifiwllon TQuA EMPLOY1fPtiT aNm AFFuwkTRYE A mON EN- IRM F.R° 4'tig�a,N��Y CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING & DEva,oPMS:�r DEPARTIIL-�'T .te++ °r POST OrPicE Boa 4748, CLCARWATER, FLORIDA 337734748 9�Q�' °r ..o4�rq� ►� MuNmcfPAL SPRyices BuamNc, 100 Sr)L -ni Mi-Ri P AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4767/ FAX ( 727) 7624865 April 16, 2013 RE: NOTICE OF FILING AN APPLICATION FOR FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AT 650 BAY ESPLANADE (FLS2013- 02006); OWNED BY: BAY ESPLANADE PROJECT LLC To Surrounding Property Owners: As a property owner within 500 feet of 650 BAY ESPLANADE, the City of Clearwater Planning and Development Department gives notice that an application has been submitted for Flexible Standard Development application to permit a 102 -room overnight accommodation use in the Tourist (T) District with a lot area of 41,232 square feet (0.95 acres), lot widths of 104 feet along Bay Esplanade (east); 289.98 feet along Bay Esplanade (south) and 182.06 feet along Poinsettia Avenue (west); a front (east) setback of 15 feet (to building); a front (south) setback of 15 feet (to building); a front (west) setback of 21 feet (to building); a side (north) setback of 5 feet (to balcony) and 10 feet (to building); a building height of 65 feet (from Base Flood Elevation to flat roof); and 129 off - street parking spaces, pursuant to the Community Development Code Section 2 -802.M and the requirements of the Old Florida District of Beach by Design; and an increase in the maximum density through the allocation of 55 overnight accommodation units from the Hotel Density Reserve created pursuant to Beach by Design, as well as an increase in the percentage of palm trees to 100 percent where 75 percent is allowable, as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program, pursuant to the Community Development Code Section 3- 1202.G. On May 2, 2013, the Development Review Committee (composed of the City's professional staff) will review and determine whether the application demonstates compliance with the City's Community Development Code. Following that review and determination, the Planning Director will issue a Development Order approving, approving with conditions, or denying the application. The earliest date that the City will make a decision on the application will be May 2, 2013. The City encourages you to participate in the review of this application. You may contact me at 562- 4567x2502 or via email at Kevin .Nurnberger @myclearwater.com for further information, visit our office to review the files and /or submit written comments to be considered in the City review of the application. Please be advised that the applicant may submit additional or new information regarding this case 4' t i d re -ular business hours. However, no further notice will be provided to you JJ��Ii, l.yvu may re`r'r4�• uurin ^y ra.y should the application be amended. An appeal of the decision of the Planning Director may be initiated by the applicant or property owners within the required notice area who present competent substantial evidence at, or prior to, the Development Review Committee meeting on May 2, 2013. An appeal must be filed, including an appeal fee, with the City Clerks Office within seven days of the issuance of the Development Order. Thank you for your interest in the City of Clearwater's development review process. You may access the Planning and Development Department through the City's website: www.myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, 4/16/2013 lQLAL EMPLOYNIENT k \D AFFIRAiA -nvE AcnON EwLo) ER" Lefler _Of Notification Ti' QF CLEARWATER •� � � PLANNING & DF,'VELOP'v1EN'I' DEPARTMENT Po,',.-r On jcr, Box 4748, C u:..,kizwATr.R l LORIDA 33758-4748 'L'h; FL011)A j3, U SlkICES BuIlDING 100 SOU'rII N1)w LL AVFNUE i L:AR\rA7 +: >ATEP;y'ft� ; 6 FAX <727) 62486t E. PH)NF ( 1 5 May 17, 2013 RE: NOTICE OF FILING AN APPLICATION FOR FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AT 650 BAY ESPLANADE (FLS2013- 02006); OWNED BY: BAY ESPLANADE PROJECT LLC To Surrounding Property Owners: As a property owner within 500 feet of 650 BAY ESPLANADE, the City of Clearwater Planning and Development Department gives notice that an application has been submitted for Flexible Standard Development application to permit a 102 -room overnight accommodation use in the Tourist (T) District with a lot area of 41,232 square feet (0.95 acres), lot widths of 104 feet along Bay Esplanade (east); 289.98 feet along Bay Esplanade (south) and 182.06 feet along Poinsettia Avenue (west); a front (east) setback of 13.1 feet (to building); front (south) setback of 15 feet (to building); front (west) setbacks of 18 feet (to balconies) and 23 feet (to building); a side (north) setback of eight feet (to balconies) and ten feet (to building); a building height of 75 feet (from Base Flood Elevation to mid -point of decorative roof structure); 131 off - street parking spaces; and a request for a two -year Development Order, pursuant to the Community Development Code Section 2- 802.M, Section 4 -303 and the requirements of the Old Florida District of Beach by Design; and an increase in the maximum density through the allocation of 55 overnight accommodation units from the Hotel Density Reserve created pursuant to Beach by Design, as well as an increase in the percentage of palm trees to 100 percent where 75 percent is allowable, as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program, pursuant to the Community Development Code Section 3- 1202.G. On June 6, 2013, the Development Review Committee (composed of the City's professional staff) will review and determine whether the application demonstates compliance with the City's Community Development Code. Following that review and determination, the Planning Director will issue a Development Order approving, approving with conditions, or denying the application. The earliest date that the City will make a decision on the application will be June 6, 2013. The City encourages you to participate in the review of this application. You may contact me at 562- 4567x2502 or via email at Kevin.Nurnberger @myclearwater.com for further information, visit our office to review the files and /or submit written comments to be considered in the City review of the application. Please be advised that the applicant may submit additional or new information regarding this case which you may review during regular business hours. However, no further notice will be provided to you should the application be amended. An appeal of the decision of the Planning Director may be initiated by the applicant or property owners within the required notice area who present competent substantial evidence at, or prior to, the Development Review Committee meeting on June 6, 2013. An appeal must be filed, including an appeal fee, with the City Clerks Office within seven days of the issuance of the Development Order. Thank you for your interest in the City of Clearwater's development review process. You may access the Planning and Development Department through the City's website: www.myclearwater.com. Sincer le y yours, ,5"//— _ 5/17/2013 0 TQt �L ' \4PL01'biE \'r A:uD !�FFtRM.4T1<'E CTiOV '1tPt.01'Et: Letter_a Notifw flon Global Sky Holdings Inc. 348 Coro.hado Dr. Clearwater Bch, FL 33767 To, Michael Defk. Planning. Director City of Clearwater 100 S. Myrtle Av Clearwater, Florida 33756 Re, FLS2013-02006 650 Bay 'Esplanade Dear Mr. Delk Please accept this as a letter of "No Objection" to the above referenced project to be located at 650 Bay Esplanade., Signed Print Manager Surf & Sand Florida LLC. 50 Royal Way Clearwater Bch, FL 33767 July I Michael Delk Planning Dire, AOr City of Clear' later I � ,00 S. !Vh"I'de Vc . rida 33756 Cleam Re: FLS201 31 i 2006 651 splanade De",A.r k1r. De acceplAb's as a letter of ov Please, ONection- to Jhe.abe referenced project tO be l0cate d at 650 Bay Esf 1, nade-�, SiLyned Paul fly 667 y ' y Esplanade Bill Hildebrand Penthouse Shores Condominium Assoc. Inc. 661 Poinsettia Avenue Clearwater, FL 33767 April 29, 2013 Dear Mr. DeNunzio, We are writing in response to your recent letter and emails regarding the DeNunzio Hotel project at 650 Bay Esplanade. Penthouse Shores Board of Directors met and discussed the original and revised plans for your project. We do note the design changes made based on our recommendations regarding relocation of the parking garage to the south side of the building, the construction of a wall on the north side and undergrounding of our utilities during construction. We also note your agreement to change the design of the balconies (to Juliet Balconies) that extend into the setbacks on the north side and your agreement to take full responsibility for the maintenance of the wall between the two properties. In view of these changes and agreements, we have no other concerns. We do however; reserve the right to comment /object should there be future changes or modifications to the project. ,. Sincer ly lNi iam Bill HiAerandM President, Board of Directors v. 1 :1 Nurnberger, Kevin From: Austin [Austin @lmaengr.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2013 10:46 AM To: jburdette505 @tampabay.rr.com Cc: Landon; istvan @architecturebp.com; Nurnberger, Kevin Subject: DeNunzio Hotel Joe, Per our conversation this morning, please find below the information relayed to me by Kevin Nurnberger. The City is considering our current building design to be 75' -4" in height, not 65' (they measure to the midpoint of the tallest architectural feature, not the flat roof). We are also showing 5' balconies along the north exterior which encroach into the 10' setback (which is allowable, but we did not ask for the encroachment in our application). In order to stay on schedule for the May 2 DRC we need to do the following ASAP: • Revise the architectural plans to show a revised building with 65' height to the midpoint of the tallest architectural feature instead of 75' -4 ", and revised the balconies to encroach a max. of 2' into the 10' north setback. (Kevin made it clear the City is not pushing us to revise the building to 65', they like the current design and would support it if we make the requested changes below) If we are willing to reschedule to the June 6 DRC we need to do the following: Revise the architectural plans to show 75' height to the tallest architectural feature instead of 75' -4 ", balconies can remain at 5' encroachment into the 10' north setback Revise the FLS application and DVA to reflect a 75' height request and a 5' encroachment into north setback (we would still have staff support with these changes) Regardless of which route we take, the CDB will still be scheduled for June 18 and City Council in July. The City likes the current design and would prefer we just remove 4" of building height and update the applications so they can re- advertise for a June 6 DRC. Ultimately it shouldn't change our schedule since we will still be set for June 18 CDB. Please advise. Randy Randy Austin = 'ONE NOUN Lando m Moree Associates, Inc. Civil & Environmental Engineers - Planners - Surveyors 31622 US Highway 19 North Palm Harbor, Florida 34684 Phone: (727) 789 -5010, ext. 211, Fax: (727) 787 -4394 Toll Free: (800) 262 -7960 I. t� Email: AUSTIN(cilLMAENGR.COM Web: WWW.LMAENGR.COM Confidentiality Notice This message contains information that is intended exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure. If you are not the named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete all copies of the message. w a Iz w ¢ w LU ¢ W W N 111 a Ir �I / (1 Q IRS%FLOOR I ,I D I �m m� I, n II 650 Bay Esplanade: Overnight Accommodation Level Principal Use Accessory Use Garage Notes L -6 16,125 0 0 L -5 16,125 0 0 L -4 15,505 620 Ezemise Room as Accessory L -3 5,080 0 18,510 L -2 21650 2,690 18 ,510 Meeting Room and Prefunction as Accessory L -1 4,015 1,340 16,300 Breakfast Area as Accessory; level 1 is above Base Flood Elevation Totals 59,500 4,650 53,320 7.82% % Accessory to Principal Use J � J y O y 0 D O 2 LL O H d y N� v� 0 � � a 7 Z. ap Z wa N m �E O U m L) DE 12.02 Plans Level 1 F2013.04.10 A -001 Uft F CL cn Lu � I ,.: : : t & �r { p j I a wI m w I i gy= .. m- - - -- -- , r UJ Z y Ir { x uaw { { D V L� ocry N CD po co Q 1 SECO �D FLOOR PLAN 9 "= I / ' &12.02 Plans Level 2 ss,.m awew,E 2013.04.10 zero urm u»waaem.ww.u..me.. « <•.+a. s�zer. .aso rom nsx z.w v,mo « A -002 .mfg t�4 N I I ............ _ ........... m I� .................... 1 Lu Lu H I � �• I£ D I Z . Q Z I I 1 m camsw :.c ( ..................... 1 I I k Q I q ,.D. =1,-- u.rm -- 0 - -- a vx - - - - -- - - -- - ------- - - - - -� sm............ i'� i w N w ' it — ! - -- -' `--- -' `--- -;-- '--- -, _ ....... : Z Y °� I .........._..._ J I I O O N V Z 'c IL C I I 'B /U RNA ✓ /' / D U m U I I OLHI FLOOR PLAN 9 KEYS 9 "= I &12.02 Plans Level 3 � u.w Issue are. 20110410 r.�n srmo sum vao A -003 I I i I 1 1 i i i i i i 1 i I — W W E W _ 4R li I / / FOURTH FLOOR PLAN 31 KEYS I P 1, 1� 1; l I i I J I 1 i- k I I� 1' I; la l n «.m l � I 11 I 1 D 1 my IA '�� Im 1 m I 1 I 1 I uao ss.ao 0 mm nmo smu umo m a C 0. W LL CL y N d Z wa 0 U m U _RR 12.02 Plans Level 4 2013.04.10 mr� 3 A -004 Y je I I to I L o. ' I a ji w w Z Y I 1 Z a I ,I ' OW E �, � I _ i` e 1 I RRaFCrTm6: J m II I O o c m N m m Im C m I I L i P Z wa E mU II FIFTH FLOOR PLAN 32 KEYS 9d= D&12.02 Plans �RryFwbs: oRuon Level 5 ss,.m �s�6 o.T6 s ss Ro 0 3.aso iwo Rmm„rs.s,Rn• 2013.04.10 L3 .A50 15.300 F,nrtBe 3,I 36.000 .letiry RmmW ReO.c,cna3unvory yE�. U30 19160 bwNav Mean.t,emm, leel l b Ner B,seiboEF4w,bn Twb 5)d90 SP50 53160 A -005 x I 1 , i 1 1 r , i �m 1 g v r , m � I .m — ® 1 �' 1 e I UI CL - ------ 1 00 F I �� 2 LL i y - - N Z n a E cl m U ISIXTH FLOOR PLAN 30 KEYS A >= moo.DE w N12.02 Plans Level 6 .e+u.......,a.w. c..,s �,.. ss..m o 2013.04.10 ww o-. n..m......mn .asa u>o .wn s,,no xssx °'"`" •• «u,d.,.. .ter A -006 -4 Z- I "Ir AMONVOIN law duo IE .7.r4lwoot H sor , Oman J, MT. _ bow loss rM '7'M Aw, .-Opq ........ - - -- Building Color 1 Building Color 2 Roof: Color 3 BM OC -108 BM 2097 -50 Red Tile Pale Moon Hint of Mauve 4 MATERIALS LEGEND Railings: Color 4 BM 1613 Silent Night 3 ENLARGED TYPICAL BUILDING ELEVATION Stucco Trim, Color 2 I Stucco, Color 2 - } }- Signage Location. West Elevation Prefinished metal railings, typical. White Stucco hotly Color 2 Stucco, Color 1 Red tile roof Stucco Trim, Color 2 Stucco, Color 1 Building Base Color 2. East Elevation J N IN J O 2 p U LL � a �d c d 7 =nom' Z!wa N A E U m U JE 7& 12.02 East & West Elevations 2012.04.10 A -008 Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. Land Development Consulting Engineering . Planning. Transportation . Permitting ICOT Center 13825 ICOT Boulevard, Suite 605 Clearwater, FL 33760 Phone: (727) 524 -1818 Fax: (727) 524 -6090 January 28, 2013 Mr. Randy Austin Landon, Moree & Associates, Inc. 31622 US Highway t9 North Palm Harbor, FI 34684 Re: Bay Esplanade Hotel — Traffic Impact Study Dear Randy: CITE' OT C? r Anre niv Please find enclosed three (3) signed copies of the Traffic Impact Study for the above - referenced property. This study concludes the surrounding roadways and intersections presently operate at acceptable levels of service and would continue to do so with the proposed redevelopment. Please submit three (3) copies with your plans package to the City of Clearwater. Sincerely, Robert Pergolizzi, AICP /PTP Principal Cc: 13 -005 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR BAY ESPLANADE HOTEL #650 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER BEACH, FLORIDA PREPARED FOR: BAY ESPLANADE PROJECT, LLC PREPARED BY: GULF COAST CONSULTING, INC. JANUARY 2013 PROJECT # 13 -005 Robert Pergolizzi, AICP, PTP AICP #9023, PTP #133 I. INTRODUCTION The 1.02 acre project site is located along the Bay Esplanade on the east side of Poinsettia Avenue in north Clearwater Beach (See Figure 1). The site is proposed to be developed as a mid -price hotel containing 102 rooms. The development of the property is the subject of a Comprehensive Infrll Redevelopment. This application requires an assessment of the traffic impacts of development. Prior to completing this analysis a methodology was established with the City of Clearwater staff. ` II. EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS The property has frontage on Bay Esplanade and Poinsettia Avenue which are two -lane local roads. Mandalay Avenue is a four -lane divided collector roadway between the roundabout and Bay Esplanade, and a two -lane collector north of Bay Esplanade. Royal Way is a two -lane local road that intersects with Mandalay Avenue and provides access to the area of the proposed hotel. As agreed to by Clearwater staff, traffic counts were conducted between 4 - 6 PM on in January 2013 at the following intersections: Mandalay Avenue / Bay Esplanade (signal) Mandalay Avenue / Royal Way All traffic counts were converted to annual average equivalents using FDOT seasonal adjustment factors. Existing traffic volumes are shown in Figure 2. Existing intersections were analyzed using the HCS 2010 software. The HCS 2010 printouts are included in Appendix A. Presently the signalized intersection at Mandalay Avenue / Bay Esplanade operates at LOS A with average delay of 7.2 seconds per vehicle during the PM peak hour. At the Mandalay Avenue / Royal Way intersection southbound left turns operate at LOS A with average delay of 7.8 seconds and the westbound approach (Royal Way) operates at LOS B with 11.9 seconds average delay. Traffic volume on Royal Way is extremely low. Mandalay Avenue south of Bay Esplanade is a four -lane divided collector roadway and according to FDOT 2012 OLOS Handbook capacity tables has a LOS D capacity of 2,630 vehicles per hour. The segment of Mandalay Avenue north of Bay Esplanade is a two -lane undivided collector roadway with a LOS D capacity of 1,200 vehicles per hour. Existing roadway conditions are shown below. N PROJECT N0: EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC (2013) 13 --005 DATE: FIGURE: Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. ® Land Development Consulting 1/2013 DRAWN BY: VT EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS - 2013 Roadway Segment Lanes PM Volume PM LOS Mandalay Ave (S. of Bay Esplanade) 4LU 638 C Mandalay Ave. (Bay Esplanade — Royal) 2LU 518 C Mandalay (N of Royal) 2LU 461 C As shown above all roadway segments and intersections operate at LOS C during PM peak hour. III. FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Existing traffic was adjusted to include expected traffic from the approved Frenchy's Restaurant and traffic from the approved Marriott East Shore Hotel. Using Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation, 90' Edition rates, the amount of new trips was calculated and estimates are shown below: TRIP GENERATION ESTIMATES Land Use ITE LUC Amount Daily Mid -Day PM Peak Hotel 312 102 rooms 833 62(31/31) 61(31/30) The expected distribution of vehicular trips is as follows: 10% to / fiom the north 90% to / from the south PROJECT IMPACT CALCULATIONS (PM PEAK HOUR) Background traffic and project traffic were added to determine total traffic for 2015 and the intersections and roadway segments were reanalyzed. The future traffic volumes are shown in Figure 3, and the HCS 2010 printouts are included in Appendix B. Under future conditions the signalized intersection at Mandalay Avenue / Bay Esplanade would operate at LOS A with average delay of 7.0 seconds per vehicle during the PM peak hour. 2 Project Road Segment Lanes Project Trips Capacity Percent Mandalay Ave. (S — Bay Esplanade 4LU 55 2630 2.09% Mandalay Ave (Bay Esplanade — Royal) 2LU 55 1200 2.09% Mandalay Ave (N. of Royal Way) 2LU 6 1200 0.5% Background traffic and project traffic were added to determine total traffic for 2015 and the intersections and roadway segments were reanalyzed. The future traffic volumes are shown in Figure 3, and the HCS 2010 printouts are included in Appendix B. Under future conditions the signalized intersection at Mandalay Avenue / Bay Esplanade would operate at LOS A with average delay of 7.0 seconds per vehicle during the PM peak hour. 2 r'1 b1 PM PEAK HOUR TOIDc / i5 im / i!1 N PROJECT NO: FUTURE PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC (2015) 13 -005 DATE: FIGURE: Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. Land Development Consulting 1/2013 DRAWN BY: VT At the Mandalay Avenue / Royal Way intersection southbound left turns would operate at LOS A with average delay of 7.9 seconds and the westbound approach (Royal Way) operates at LOS B with 12.5 seconds average delay. At the project driveway all movements would operate at LOS A with minimal delay. FUTURE ROADWAY CONDITIONS - 2015 Roadway Segment Lanes PM Voluine PM LOS Mandalay Ave (S. of Bay Esplanade) 4LU 704 C Mandalay Ave. (Bay Esplanade — Royal) 2LU 584 C Mandalay (N of Royal) 2LU 478 C As shown above all roadway segments and intersections would continue to operate at LOS C during the PM peak hour. IV. CONCLUSION This analysis was conducted in accordance with a specific methodology established with City of Clearwater staff. This analysis demonstrates traffic operations at nearby intersections and on adjacent roadways would continue at acceptable levels of service with the proposed hotel during the PM peak hour. 3 APPENDIX A Robert Pergolizzi From: Bennett.Elbo @myClearwater.com Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 20131:29 PM To: Himanshu .Patni @MyClearwater.com; Robert Pergolizzi Subject: RE: Bay Esplanade Hotel Robert - The methodology is accepted. Please proceed with the TIS. Thanks Bennett Elbo Engineering Specialist Traffic Engineering 727 - 562 -4775 phone 727 -562 -4755 fax Bennett.Elbo@Mclearwater.com From: Patni, Himanshu Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 5:04 PM To: Elbo, Bennett Subject: FW: Bay Esplanade Hotel Ben, take a look at this when I'm gone and give Robert a call to discuss. Thanks From: Robert Pergolizzi [ mailto: pergo @gulfcoastconsultinginccoml Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 4:03 PM To: Patni, Himanshu Subject: Bay Esplanade Hotel Himanshu — Happy New Yearl I will be doing a Traffic Analysis for a proposed 102 room hotel on Bay Esplanade in north Clearwater Beach. The site is off of Royal Way. I propose to conduct PM peak period (4 -6 PM) traffic counts at the following locations; Mandalay Ave / Bay Esplanade (signal) Mandalay Ave / Royal Way (stop) These intersections and Mandalay Avenue (Bay Esplanade to north) would be analyzed for existing conditions. Background traffic conditions will include the potential traffic from the Marriott Courtyard hotel on East Shore and the Frenchy's on East Shore both of which are approved projects that I completed the Traffic Studies for. ITE Trip Generation, 91" Edition shows this new 102 room hotel as generating 833 daily trips and 60 PM peak hour trips. This will be added to accumulated background traffic to estimate total traffic with the project. Future conditions for the intersections and Mandalay Avenue will be analyzed. A written TIS Report will be submitted with the application. Please let me know if there is anything else you need. 5:30 -5:45 EEAK HOUR I P.H.F. DATA PROJECT: BAY ESPLANADE HOTEL PROJECT NO: 13-005 LOCATION: Mandalay Ave (NS) & 5:45 6:00 Bay Esplanade (E -M DATE: January 23, 2013 LANE TYPE: SPEED MIT: 161' 650 SIGNAL TIMING: A G Y R (SECONDS) (E -W green on demand only) NB 4 Lane NS N/A NB SB 2 Lane SB N/A SB 21 EB 2 Lane EB NIA EB 6 WB 2 Lane WB WA WB SB 5:30 -5:45 153 655 HOURLY FD OW DIAGRAM 5:45 6:00 161' 650 235 288 �— 94 542 63 3 443 21 9 3 58 52 6 7 1,301 i 1 PEAK HOUR TIME NB NB NB SB SB SB ES EB EB WB WB WB TOTAL 13 221 1 PM L T R L T R L T R L T R VOLUME 169 74 6 L. 4 31 4:30 -4:45 166 2 — 1 4:455:00 5:005:15 38 –� 30 26 –� 32 5:155:30 175 I 50 278 .29 1 221 13 6 2 30 26 1 -� 4 671 601 278 219 INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR 4:30 -5:30 INTERSECTION PHF 0.96 277 367 INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR VOLUME 671 PEAK HOUR VOLUME NB 367 PHF NB 0.95 PEAK HOUR VOLUME SB 235 PHF SB 0.90 7,% 'o, PEAK HOUR VOLUME EB 38 PHF EB 0.79 21 n, PEAK HOUR VOLUME WS 31 PHF WB 0.78 4 i }> r r � -7 4 PROJECT: LOCATION: DATE: LANE TYPE: NB SB ES WB PEAK HOUR 5:30 -5:45 PEAK HOUR I P.H . DATA BAY ESPLANADE HOTEL PROJECT NO: 13 -005 Mandalay Ave (N -S) & 92 398 Royal Way (E -W) FLOW DIAGRAM 5 :45 -6:00 January 24. 2013 SPEED LIMIT: SIGNAL TIMING: A G Y $ 143 426 (SECONDS) (NOT APPLICABLE) 2 Lane NS WA NB 2 Lane SB NIA SB 2 Lane EB N/A ES 2 Lane WS N/A WB 0 488 32 2 385 0 0 PM PEAK HOUR COUNTS 0 5:30 -5:45 92 398 HOURLY FLOW DIAGRAM 5 :45 -6:00 143 426 T 216 249 0 488 32 2 385 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 908 1 T TIME NB NB NB SB SB SB EB EB EB WB WB WB TOTAL 0 215 1 PM L T R L T R L T R L T R VOLUME 1 4:00 -4:15 130 0- 0 L 0 4:15 -4:30 105 0 0 4:30 -4:45 132 0, 0 17 4:45-5:00 ' _ 115 0 249 16 1 215 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 482 0 249 16 1 t INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR 4:00 -5:00 INTERSECTION PHF 0.91 216 265 INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR VOLUME 482 PEAK HOUR VOLUME NB 265 PHF NB 0.87 I PEAK HOUR VOLUME SS 216 PHF SB 0.93 PEAK HOUR VOLUME EB 0 PHF ES #DIV /01 PEAK HOUR VOLUME WS 1 PHF WB 0.25 V41 2011 Peak Season Factor Category Report - Report Type: ALL Category: 1500 PINELLAS COUNTYWIDE * Peak Season Page 1 of 2 MOCF: 0.92 Week Dates SF PSCF 1 GO1/01/2011 - 01/01/2011 1.06 1.15 2 01/02/2011 - 01/08/2011 1.05 1.14 3 01/09/2011 - 01/15/2011 1.04 1.12 4 01/16/2011 - 01/22/2011 1.09 5 01/23/2011 - 01/29/2011 *999 1_07 6 01/30/2011 - 02/05/2011 1.05 * 7 02/06/2011 - 02/12/2011 0.95 1.03 * 8 02/13/2011 - 02/19/2011 0.93 1.01 * 9 02/20/2011 - 02/26/2011 0.92 1.00 *10 02/27/2011 - 03/05/2011 0.91 0.98 *11 03/0612011 - 03/12/2011 0.90 0_97 *12 03/13/2011 - 03/19/2011 0.90 0.97 *13 03/20/2011 - 03/26/2011 0.90 0.97 *14 03/27/2011 - 04/02/2011 0.91 0.98 *15 04/03/2011 - 04/09/2011 0.92 1.00 *16 04/10/2011 - 04/16/2011 0.93 1.01 *17 04/17/2011 - 04/23/2011 0.94 1.02 *18 04/24/2011 - 04/30/2011 0.95 1.03 *19 05/01/2011 - 05/0712011 0.96 1.04 „ 20 05/08/2011 - 05/14/2011 0.97 1.05 21 05/15/2011 - 05/21/2011 0.99 1.07 22 .05/22/2011 - 05/28/2011 0.99 1.07 23 05/29/2011 - 06/04/2011 0.99 1.07 24 06105/2011 - 06/11/2011 1.00 1.08 25 06/12/2011 - 06/18/2011 1.00 1.08 26 06/19/2011 - 06/25/2011 1.01 1.09 , 27 06/26/2011 - 07/02/2011 1.01 1.09 28 07/03/2011 - 07/09/2011 1.01 1.09 29 07/10/2011 - 07/16/2011 1.02 1.10 30 07/17/2011 - 07/23/2011 1.03 1.11 31 07/24/2011 - 07/30/2011 1.03 1.11 32 07/31/2011 - 08/06/2011 1.04 1.12 33 08/07/2011 - 08/13/2011 1.05 1.14 34 08/14/2011 - 08/20/2011 1.06 1.15 35 08/21/2011 - 08/27/2011 1.06 1.15 36 08/28/2011 - 09/03/2011 1.07 1.16 37 09/04/2011 - 09/10/2011 1.07 1.16 38 09/11/2011 - 09/17/2011 1.08 1.17 39 09/18/2011 - 09/24/2011 1.07 1.16 40 09/25/2011 - 10/01/2011 1.06 1.15 41 10/02/2011 - 10/08/2011 1.05 1.14 42 10/09/2011 - 10/15/2011 1.04• 1.12 43 10/16/2011 - 10/22/2011 1.04 1.12 44 10/23/2011 - 10/29/2011 1.05 1.14 45 10/30/2011 - 11/05/2011 1.05 1.14 46 11/06/2011 - 11/12/2011 1.05 1.14 47 11/13/2011 - 11/19/2011 1.05 1.14 48 11/20/2011 - 11/26/2011 1.05 1.14 49 11/27/2011 - 12/03/2011 1.06 1.14 50 12/04/2011 - 12/10/2011 1.06 1.15 51 12/11/2011 - 12/17/2011 1.06 1.15 52 12/18/2011 - 12/24/2011 1.05 1.14 53 12/25/2011 - 12/31/2011 1.04 1.12 * Peak Season Page 1 of 2 HCS 2010 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information Agency GCC Duration, h 0.25 Analyst VT Analysis Date 1/24/2013 Area Type Other: r: ` Jurisdiction Clearwater Time Period PM PHF 0.96 Intersection Mandalay / Bay Esplanade Analysis Year 2013 Analysis Period 1> 4:00 File Name MNDBAYX.xus 1 N.:r: B N f' Project Description PM Peak Hour Existing 2013 Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand (y), veh/h Signal Information 6 2 30 26 1 4 59 275 29 1 ; Ni A �" 219 13 q Cycle, s 100.0 Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Green 75.0 15.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .........: 0 .o 0.0 0.0 10.0 1 Simult. G E/W On d Yes Gap Uncoordinated Un p Yellow 4,0 4.0 0. 0 0.0 Red 1.0 1.0 10.0 0.0 Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Assigned Phase 4 8 2 6 Case Number 8.0 8.0 6.0 8.0 Phase Duration, s 20.0 20.0 80.0 80.0 Change Period, (Y +Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5'0 Max Allow Headway (MAH), s 3.2 3.2 3.1 3.1 Queue Clearance Time (gs), s 4.1 3.5 7.3 5.7 Green Extension Time (go), s 0.1 0.1 1.2 1.2 Phase Call Probability 1.00 1.00 1 1.00 1.00 Max Out Probability 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Adjusted Flow Rate (y), veh/h 40 32 61 317 243 Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate (s), veh /h/in 1629 1497 1156 1868 1880 Queue Service Time (gs), s 0.0 1 0.0 1.6 5.1 0.0 Cycle Queue Clearance Time (gc), s 2.1 1.5 5.3 5.1 3.7 Capacity (c), veh/h 286 291 896 1401 1446 Volume -to- Capacity Ratio (X) 0.138 0.111 0.069 0.226 0.168 Available Capacity (ca), veh /h 286 291 896 1401 1446 Back of Queue (Q), veh /In (50th percentile) 0.8 0.7 0.3 1.5 1.1 Overflow Queue (Q3), veh /in 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Queue Storage Ratio (RQ) (50th percentile) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (di), s /veh 37.0 36.8 4.4 3.8 3.6 Incremental Delay (d2), s /veh 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Initial Queue Delay (d3), s /veh 0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay (d), s /veh 37.1 36.8 .4 3.8 3.6 Level of Service (LOS) D F3-6j D aD19= A A A Approach Delay, s /veh /LOS 37.1 D .8 A 3.6 A Intersection Delay, s /veh / LOS Multimodal Results 7.2 EB WB A NB SB Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS 2.3 B 2.1 B 2.0 B 2.0 B Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 0.6 A 0.5 A 1.1 A 0.9 A Copyright © 2013 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS 20101m Streets Version 6.41 Generated: 1124/2013 9:00:18 AM Two -Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ISite Information Date Performed Royal Way and Mandalay Ave 1112512013 Clearwater nal sis_Time Period 2013 lExisting PM L T R Project Description 13 -005 Bay Esplanade T East/West Street: Royal Way Volume veh/h) Intersection Orientation: North -South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbou Movement 1 1,00 2 1.00 L Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h T Volume veh/h) 0 1 247 Peak -Hour Factor PHF 1.00 0 0.91 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh /h 0 0 271 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 -- Median Type N RT Channelized N Storage Lanes 1 0 1 Intersection Royal Way and Mandalay Ave Jurisdiction Clearwater Analysis Year 2013 12 Southbound 3 4 5 R L �T 16 1 213 ).91 0.91 0.91 17 1 234 -- 0 -- Undivided 0 0 1 1 TR L T 0 Westbound i rr 0 [1 Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 11.9 1 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1,00 0.91 1.00 0.91 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 0 0 0 1 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade ( %) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 configuration I I I I I LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR (veh /h) 1 1 C (m) (veh/h) 1286 523 vie 0.00 0.00 95% queue length 0.00 0.01 Control Delay (s /veh) 7.8 11.9 LOS A B Approach Delay (s /veh) -- -- 11.9 Approach LOS -- -- B Copyright © 2010 University or Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS +TM Version 5.6 Generated: 1/2512013 9:15 AM file : / / /C: /Users /vtoma /AppData /Local /Teinp /u2kDE54.tmp 1/25/2013 Generalized Peak Hour Two -Way Volumes for Florida's TABLE 4 Urbanized Areas' 12/18/12 STATE SIGNALIZED ARTERIALS FREEWAYS Lanes B C D E Class I (40 mph or higher posted speed limit) 4 4,120 5,540 6,700 7,190 Lanes Median B C D E 6 6,130 8$70 10,060 11,100 2 Undivided * 1,510 1,600 ** g 8,230 11,100 13,390 15,010 4 Divided * 3,420 3,580 ** 10 10,330 14,040 16,840 18,930 6 Divided * 5,250 5,390 ** 12 14,450 18,880 22,030 22,860 8 Divided * 7,090 7,210 ** Class 11 (35 mph or slower posted speed limit) Freeway Adjustments Lanes Median B C D E Auxiliary Lanes Ramp 2 Undivided * 660 1,330 1,410 Present in Both Directions Metering 4 Divided * 1,310 `2,92.01 3,040 +1,800 +5% 6 Divided * 2,090 4,500 4,590 8 Divided * 2,880 6,060 6,130 go'Vo 2.t -v ( "Do 12.00 Non -State Signalized Roadway Adjustments (Alter corresponding state volumes by the indicated percent.) Non -State Signalized Roadways - 10% 90% 4L_L> ltbO Median & Turn Lane Adjustments UNINTERRUPTED FLOW HIGHWAYS Exclusive Exclusive Adjustment Lanes Median B C D E Lanes Median Left Lanes Right Lanes Factors 2 Undivided 770 1,530 2,170 2,990 2 Divided Yes No +5% 2 Undivided No No -200/0 4 Divided 3,300 4,660 5,900 6,530 Multi Undivided Yes No -5% 6 Divided 4,950 6,990 8,840 9,790 Multi Undivided No No -25% _ - - Yes +5% Uninterrupted flow Highway Adjustments Lanes Median Exclusive left lanes Adjustment factors One -Way Facility Adjustment 2 Divided Yes +5% Multiply the corresponding two - directional Multi Undivided Yes -5% volumes in this table by 0.6 Multi Undivided No -25% Z BICYCLE MODE' < I ., .... - ::•.:' } „. __e:.:: _:.: ;eti_� ; i:: VRluesshowa :niepiesentgd�s's_:peuk'iour. two- wuy. vbluincs ;for_:kv�`oFs��ce.n»d_�:�.:,: (Multiply motorized vehicle volumes shown below by number of determine �e: forthceutomoblteAnickmodesunlessspeclixallystated Ttirsfablecloesrtot_- -; is a : constitute 'eleticlanl�rdt`sirouldbeed: only. 7oir gcge 'ralplo'einul�p�S1iC61t�`•The. t; " directional roadway anes to two-way maximum service Y y _': cotilputc� ;tnudclsfmtnwhichtlira. fable_ Isderived.§ iroutdbearsalf�rucore _speclEio:_= ' volumes.) :jilaiui(iig ilppl[ options _TIiB;'lalitd`iiiiil':derl vin'g'corigi iter;niodeL 'shoutd iwt be >`.00Rldot oru�eisecikon des g�l> wlielti ntotePetined teciwques alt>st Gaku�at�olls are Paved Shoulder/Bicycle y ., = basedoyp. umn�ap�lic` ations�oftheHlglNvnyCeltac .rtyMaeualk�utdtlte_Tionstt ' Lane Coverage B "_ cep a '��' ua d �Q .,._: - 0 -49% * 260 680 1,770 },. ::i =:_', ZLevetofservleeforthebicyc fcandpedcsMantnoiles' iii [hiv:tflhloist,ascdonnumber,;,. 50 -84% 190 600 1,770 >1,770 athotoilredvehicle noirimnbetofli( cycuctsorpedestlelisusing (lieikicihty 85-100% 830 1,770 1,770 Biuesperlrowshgjvii; dieo, M'; tgrihepcak, lnurptlicsingkdtrectioniifthq ,higllerfratTic.;,�•;, PEDESTRIAN MODE' flow w� w (Multiply motorized vehicle volumes shown bolo b y number of - - - ,,,.,.; Caiwgt.t!o �icEtieped usb g • , ,imp,...., p ,,,,, _,., ............. ..............,.:.. _,...._. directional roadway lanes to determine two-way maximum service i:corv"tt.sc;`e : ;vi? -. cb_el_ yo�t :m-ethteyevolumes.) _.r . - g:C : dbe•c::-a:Fu:.os:o r:a::.U.,e_ ' illtcrsecttoncepagttleg5laye Sidewalk Coverage B C D E beenreaChed Forthebkcyiileraodc thcYleveiofservlcektter 'gcade(utcludmgf)ivt�t:: u * * 250 850 0 j u hte,vablebe6kitise'th* _ it go mkiicuntup vchiclgrv616ietllivshold asui@ tAl iiyiut : ;j s -49/0 50 -84% * 150 780 1,420 veluedefeulis . a�� e >1,770 85 -100% 340 960 1,560 .. ..: .:. .... ..._..... ... ... ....... _ {ut ........... `1 Fixed Route ;� VS 1/ / BUS (Scheduled _.I,._..1:-..�'. �. (Buses in peek hour in peak direction) �[ _ Sidewalk Coverage B C D E y�,:= •:r__::_±:._ „t]or�q;, to Tiorts tii[on =_' ' 1f.Ar pq. 0-84% 5 4 _ _ r t :S •w�fw'ra.id, r os % P�slta_ i- ua- iu�l usO/-of_f�liac�te_m.• _ ?- :��' 85 -100% > 4 3 2 w..., •. a1,{ ay u�; S 19 2012 FDOT QUALITY /LEVEL OF SERVICE HANDBOOK TABLES Hotel (310) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Rooms On a: Weekday Number of Studies: Average Number of Rooms: Directional Distribution: 10 476 50% entering, 50% exiting Trip Generation per Room Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 8,17 3.47 - 9.58 3.38 Data Plot and Equation a v c W fl. F a� U L a) m 4) a u 18,000 17,000 16,000 15,000 14,000 13,000 12,000 11,000 10,000 9,000 8,000 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0 - : — X .. .. .. ._.; .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. X . . .. .. . .. . ...:... . .. .. X, 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 X = Number of Rooms X Actual Pate Points Fitted Curve --•-- -- Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: T = 8.95(X) - 373.16 R2 = 0.98 Trip Generation, 9th Edition a Institute of Transportation Engineers 613 Hotel (310) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Rooms On a: Weekday, P.M. Peak Hour of Generator Number of Studies: 35 Average Number of Rooms: 294 Directional Distribution: 58% entering, 42% exiting alt -0 - -D -AY If rip veneration per rtoom Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.61 0.20 - 1.23 0.81 uata Niot and Equation 600 500 w c 400 w a m 300 rn aD 200 100 X ; -X ..... . ..... ... -- ...x...... .X' -. x /...... X X X -- X x ;...........X: ......X....: -- - -.x.. ....X..... -X" ; .X .XrC -X . ................. :......................... . .......... X X X X X ; 0 . 0 100 200 300 X = Number of Rooms X Actual Data Points Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given 400 500 - -- Average Rate R2 c * * ** 600 Trip Generation, 9th Edition a Institute of Transportation Engineers 617 Hotel (310) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Rooms On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Number of Studies: 33 Average Number of Rooms: 200 Directional Distribution: 51 % entering, 49% exiting Trip Generation per Room Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation A an • 0.21 - 1.06 0.81 Data Plot and Equation Trip Generation, 9th Edition 0 Institute of Transportation Engineers 615 i 500 X 400 .............................. .. XlL 300 ............. ; ................. X yS• X ........ ...........!.... 200 X; Q X X X. XX ;' .............. .............. :.X . X ...X 100 ............ . X XxX X X 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 X = Number of Rooms - - -- -- Average Rate X Actual Data Points R2 Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given Trip Generation, 9th Edition 0 Institute of Transportation Engineers 615 i HCS 2010 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information 4 �:'a ►:`F ti' :! :r Agency GCC Duration, h 0.25 Analyst VT Analysis Date 1/2412013 Area Type Other Jurisdiction Clearwater Time Period IPM PHF 0.96 Intersection Mandalay / Bay Esplanade Analysis Year 12015 JAnalysisPerlod 1>4:00 File Name MNDBAYWP.xus Project Description I PM Peak Hour Future 2013 Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand (v), veh /h Signal Information 6 2 ON 30 26 1 4 59 308 29 1 252 2 13 Cycle, s 100.0 Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Green 75.0 15.0 10.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 11.0 T0.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 10.0 10.0 Uncoordinated Yes Simult. Gap ENV On Yellow 14 .0 Force Mode Fixed Simult, Gap N/S On I Red 11.0 Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Assigned Phase 4 8 2 6 Case Number 8.0 8.0 6.0 8.0 Phase Duration, s 20.0 20.0 80.0 80.0 Change Period, (Y +Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Allow Headway (MA14), s 3.2 3.2 3.1 3.1 Queue Clearance Time (gs), s 4.1 3.5 8.0 6.3 Green Extension Time (ge), s 1 0.1 0.1 1.3 1.3 Phase Call Probability I 1 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Max Out Probability 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Adjusted Flow Rate (v), vehm 40 32 61 351 277 Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate (s), veh /h /In 1629 1497 1121 1871 1883 Queue Service Time (g5), s 0.0 1 0.0 1.7 5.8.. .. 0.0 Cycle Queue Clearance Time (gc), s 2.1 1 1.5 6.0 5.8 4.3 Capacity (c), veh /h 286 291 864 1403 1448 Volume -to- Capacity Ratio (X) 0.138 0.111 0.071 0.250 0.191 Available Capacity (ce), veh/h 286 291 864 1 1403 1448 Back of Queue (Q), vehAn (50th percentile) 0.8 0.7 0.3 1.7 1.2 Overflow Queue (Q3), vehAn 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Queue Storage Ratio (RQ) (50th percentile) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (di), s /veh 37.0 36.8 4.5 3.8 3.7 Incremental Delay (d2), s /veh 0.1 0.1 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Initial Queue Delay (d3), s /veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay (d), s /veh 37.1 36.8 4.6 3.9 3.7 Level of Service (LOS) D D A A A Approach Delay, s /veh / LOS 37.1 D 36.8 D 4.0 A 3.7 A Intersection Delay, s /veh / LOS Multimodal Results EB WB NB SB Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS 2.3 B 2.1 B 2.0 1 8 2.0 B Bicycle LOS Score I LOS 0.6 A 0.5 A 1.2 1 A 0.9 A Copyright© 2013 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS 2010Tm Streets Version 6.41 Generated: 1125/2013 1:34:00 PM Two -Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ISite Information nal st VT enc /Co. GCC Date Performed 112512013 nal sis Time Period Future PM Intersection Royal Way and Mandalay Ave Jurisdiction Clearwater Analysis Year 2015 Southbound Movement Ave Intersection Orientation: North -South 1,9tucly Penoa nrs : v.zo Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 252 44 4 219 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh /h 0 276 48 4 240 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- — 0 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration TR L T Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 28 3 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh /h 0 0 0 30 0 3 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade ( %) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Confi uration I I I LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service pproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR (veh /h) 4 33 C (m) (veh /h) 1247 514 v/c 0.00 0.06 95% queue length 0.01 0.21 Control Delay (s/veh) 7.9 12.5 LOS A B Approach Delay (s /veh) -- -- 12.5 Approach LOS -- -- a Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS +TM Version 5.6 Generated: 1/26/2013 1:33 PM file: / / /C:/ Users/ vtoma /AppData/Local/Teinp /U2k6C4E.tmp 1/25/2013 Two -Way Stop Control TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ISite Information Analyst VT Agency/Co. GCC Date Performed 112512013 Analysis Time Period Future PM Page 1 of 1 Intersection Bay Esplanade and Driveway Jurisdiction Clearwater Analysis Year 2015 1 2 Project Description 13 -005 Bay Esplanade East/West Street: Say Esplanade North /South Street: Driveway Intersection Orientation: East -West iStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Ma or Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 31 5 0 5 0 Peak -Hour Factor PHF 0.91 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh /h 34 5 0 0 5 0 Percent Heav Vehicles 0 7 -- 0 -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 1 ? 1 Configuration LT L T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 30 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh /h 0 0 0 0 0 32 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 r 0 Percent Grade ( %) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 1 Confi uration R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT L R v (veh/h) 34 0 32 C (m) (veh /h) 1630 1630 1 1084 lc 0.02 0.00 0.03 95% queue length 0.06 0.00 0.09 Control Delay (s /veh) 7.3 7.2 8.4 LOS A A A pproach Delay (s /veh) -- - 8.4 pproach LOS -- -- A Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS +TM Version 5.6 Generated: 1/25/2013 1:313 PM file: / / /C:/ Users/ vtoma /AppData /Local/Temp /u2k9CFF.tmp 1/25/2013 DeNunzio Hotel City of Clearwater, Florida January 2013 Revised April 2013 DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS Prepared for: Bay Esplanade Project L.L.C. 305 Cambridge Street, Suite 3 Cambridge, MA 02141 Ph. (617) 945 -2555 Prepared by: �: L M A Landon, Moree & Associates, Inc. Civil & Environmental Engineers Planners- Surveyors 31622 U.S. Highway 19 North Palm Harbor, Florida 34684 (727) 789 -5010 F.E.B. No. EB- 0004096 LMA JOB # 651 -01 RECEIVE P' ZNIrt�G ?W MIME CITY O� CCMAPE? CONTRIBUTING AREA (1/2" RUNOFF) 0.95 VOLUME CONTRIBUTING OFF -SITE AREA (acre) 0.00 (ft) (Acres) (ac -ft) (RUNOFF FROM 1" RAINFALL) 4.50 0.042 0.000 WATER QUALITY 5.50 0.042 0.042 VOLUME (ac -ft) WATER QUALITY ELEVATION (ft) 5.44 Drainage Calcs2 DeNunzio Hotel Water Quality Volume /Stage Summary ELEV. AREA CUMUL. 6.50 0 0.042 0 0.084 7.50 0 0.042 0 0.126 8.50 0 0.042 0 0.168 9.50 0 0.042 0 0.210 10.00 0 0 042 0 0.231 Stage vs. Storage 10.00 9.00 8.00 7.00 6.00 Stage vs. Storage 5.00 Treatment Volume 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 0.000 0.050 0.100 0.150 0.200 0.250 I Storage (ac -ft) ' CONTRIBUTING AREA (1/2" RUNOFF) 0.95 VOLUME CONTRIBUTING OFF -SITE AREA (acre) 0.00 (ft) (Acres) (ac -ft) (RUNOFF FROM 1" RAINFALL) 4.50 0.042 0.000 WATER QUALITY 5.50 0.042 0.042 VOLUME (ac -ft) WATER QUALITY ELEVATION (ft) 5.44 Drainage Calcs2 6.50 0 0.042 0 0.084 7.50 0 0.042 0 0.126 8.50 0 0.042 0 0.168 9.50 0 0.042 0 0.210 10.00 0 0 042 0 0.231 VOLUME (ac -ft) WATER QUALITY ELEVATION (ft) 5.44 Drainage Calcs2 Drainage Calcs2 undrdm DeNunzio Hotel DRAWDOWN WORKSHEET FOR UNDERDRAIN R QUALITY ELEVATION D VOL BOTTOM OF POND ELEVATION 4.50 FT NAVD WATER QUALITY UNDERDRAIN TOTAL •D 1.69 FT INCREMENTAL .D STEP 1) 1 FT # STEPS TO :•- • ZERO HEAD 16 STEPS INCREMENTALVOL FLOW LENGTH THROUGH DIA 2 FT HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY(K) 5 FT/HR UNIT PIPE LENGTH (L) 1 FT ACTUAL PIPE LENGTH 25.0 FEET ACTUAL -• D• HOURS Note: (Actual length * Actual time) (Unit length Time for unit length) detention with effluent filtration system, again detention volume must be available undrdm DeNunzio Hotel RATIONAL METHOD * 50 year storm event * zone 6 Overland Flow = minutes Curb Flow = minutes Time of Concentration = 60 minutes PREDEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS Historical Peak Disharge --- - - - - -> Q = C * I * A WEIGHTED "C" FACTOR = 0.22 INTENSITY (in /hr) = 4.1 in /hr AREA (acres) = 095 acres 0.86 cfs PROPOSED CONDITIONS "C" factor Impervious = 0.63 acres * J.95 = 0.599 Rock = 0.00 acres * 0.65 = 0.000 Pond = 0.04 acres * 1.00 = 0.040 Open Space = 0.28 acres * 0.22 = 0.062 0.95 acres WEIGHTED "C" = 0.737 PEAK STORM RELEASE RAINFALL INTENSITY FLOW RUNOFF FLOW REQUIRED DURATION I Q =CIA VOLUME VOLUME STORAGE min sec (inlhr cfs c c q (cf ) (ac ft) 60 3600 4.1 2.89 10406 3106 7299 0.168 < Drainage Calcs2 DeNunzio Hotel Volume /Stage Summary ELEV. AREA CUMUL. CONTRIBUTING AREA 0.95 VOLUME OFF -SITE CONTRIBUTING AREA (acre) 0.00 (ft) (Acres) (ac -ft) 4; 0.042 0.000 50 YR VOLUME PLUS 5.50 0.042 0.042 WATER QUALITY VOLUME (ac -ft) 0.20! 6.50 0.042 0.084 7.50 0.042 0.126 50 YR 8.50 0.042 0.168 POND (ft) 9.43 9.501 0.042 0.210 ELEVATION 10001 0.042 0.231 Stage vs. Storage 12.00 10.00 -- — - -- 8.00 a� 6.00 - - — - -- u) 4.00 2.00 0.00 0.000 0.050 0.100 0.150 0.200 0.250 Storage (ac -ft) Orifice Calculations VERTICAL CIRCULAR ORIFICE FLOW Q = C a (2 g h)'' Diameter (d) = 1.09 Inches _ Orifice Area (a) = 0.0914 Sq.Ft. C Value = 0.60 Coefficient of discharge ORIFICE FLOW AT DHW Orifice D DHW O Orifice H h — - - -- Id Tree Inventory 650 Bay Esplanade Clearwater Beach, Florida March 7, 2013 Prepared by: Urban Forestry Solutions, llc Rick Albee, Member For: Randy Austin Landon, Moree & Assoc. Inc 31622 U.S. 19 N. Palm Harbor, Fl 34684 fir °dJT'c�Z C,Tf Qy. CIt The following report is submitted by Urban Forestry Solutions, llc, and includes findings that I believe are accurate based on my education, experience and knowledge in the field of Arboriculture. I have no interest personally or financially in this property and my report is factual and unbiased. The following Tree Inventory Report will identify each tree by its size, species and overall condition with accompanying notes justifying the Condition Rating. The Tree Survey indicates the location of the tree on the site by the tree identification number. This tree identification number corresponds to the number on the Tree Inventory Report. Tree Inventory Data A tree inventory is a written record of a tree's condition at the time of inspection. Problems not apparent upon visual observations cannot be noted and were not noted. A tree inventory is also a valuable tool to prioritize tree maintenance and/or removal of trees with problems that could lead to failure and cause personal injury or property damage. The following is an explanation of the data used in the inventory: Tree# - location - Each tree is assigned a number for reference in the inventory that corresponds with a number on the Tree Survey that identifies the location of the tree in the field. Size — Diameter at breast height (DBH) is the size of the tree's trunk measured at 4.5' above grade. If there is a fork in the trunk at that point, the diameter is measured at the narrowest area below the fork. Palm species are measured in feet of clear trunk (C.T.). Species — The first time the tree is listed in the inventory, it is listed by its common and botanical name. For simplicity, the tree is listed by its common name thereafter. Condition Rating — The Condition Rating is an assessment of the tree's overall structural strength and systemic health. Elements of structure include: 1) the presence of cavities, decayed wood and /or split, cracked, or rubbing branches etc., 2) branch arrangements and attachments (i.e., well - spaced branches vs. several branches emanating from the same area on the trunk; co- dominant stems vs. single leader trunk; presence of branch collars vs. included bark). The overall condition rating also takes into consideration the species, appearance and any unique features. The rating scale is 0 -6 with 0 being a dead tree and 6 a specimen. Increments of 0.5 are used to increase accuracy. Examples of the tree rating system are as follows: 0- A dead tree 1- A tree that is dying, severely declining, hazardous, harboring a communicable disease. A tree with a rating of #1 should be removed as it is beyond treatment and is a threat to cause personal injury or property damage. 2 — A tree exhibiting serious structural defects such as: dominant stems with included bark at or near the base; large cavities; large areas of decayed wood; extreme crown dieback; cracked/split scaffold branches; etc. Also included is a tree with health issues (low energy, low live crown ratio, serious disease or insect problems, nutritional deficiencies or soil pH problems). A tree with a rating of #2 should be removed unless the problem(s) can be treated. A tree with a #2 Condition Rating will typically require a considerable amount of maintenance to qualify for an upgrade of the Condition Rating. 3- A tree with average structure and systemic health, minor crown dieback and problems that can be corrected with moderate maintenance. A tree with a co- dominant stem not in the basal area that can be subordinated, cabled and braced or a co- dominant stem that will soon have included bark can be included as a #3. A tree with a rating of #3 has average appearance, crown density and live crown ratio and should be preserved if possible. 4- A tree with a rating of #4 has good structure and systemic health with minor problems that can be easily corrected with minor maintenance. The tree should have an attractive appearance and be essentially free of any debilitating disease or insect problem. The tree should also have above average crown density and live crown ratio. Mature trees exhibiting scars, old wounds, small cavities or other problems that are not debilitating can be included in this group particularly if they possess unique form or other aesthetic amenities relating to their age. A tree with a rating of #4 is valuable to the property and should be preserved. 5 — A tree with very high live crown ratio and exceptional structure and systemic health and virtually free of insect or disease problems or nutritional deficiencies. A tree in this category should have a balanced crown with exceptional aesthetic amenities. A tree in this category should be of a species that possess characteristics inherent to longevity and withstanding construction impacts. A tree with a #5 rating lends considerable value to the site and should be incorporated into the site design. A tree with a #5 rating is worthy of significant site plan modification to ensure its preservation. 6 — A specimen tree. A specimen tree is a tree that possesses a combination of superior qualities in regards to systemic health, structural strength, crown density, live crown ratio, form (balanced crown), overall aesthetic appeal, size, species, age and uniqueness. A great effort should be made to preserve a specimen tree including shifting structures that would adversely impact the tree. A specimen tree should have an undisturbed growth area equal to its drip line (equal to the branch spread). Only an experienced and competent International Society of Arboriculture (I.S.A.) Certified Arborist should be allowed to perform maintenance work on a specimen tree. TREE INVENTORY REPORT Please note: Trees are living organisms, and with all living organisms, certain degrees of stress may be experienced when they are disturbed in any way. It must be pointed out that it is not humanly possible to entirely ascertain the full extent of stress that the tree may experience. Nor is it possible to assure with 100% probability that the trees will survive. However, with professional arboricultural consulting, it is hoped that the stress factors can be held to a minimum and that the trees will continue to thrive during and following construction. Tree # Size Species Rating 1 14' CT sabel palm (Saba) palmetto) 4.0 2 12' CT queen palm (Syagrus romanzoffiana) 2.0 3 15' CT sabel palm 3.0 4 15' CT sable palm 4.0 5 15' CT sable palm 3.0 6 20' CT sable palm 3.0 7 16" Norfolk Island pine (Araucaria heterophylla} 1.0 8 7' CT sable palm 4.0 9 27' CT sable palm 2.0 Comment: Basel decay. 10 18' CT sable palm 2.0 11 16' CT sable palm 4.0 12 17' CT sable palm 4.0 13 15' CT sable palm 4.0 14 6' CT sable palm 1.0 15 12' CT queen palm 2.0 3 16 15' CT sable palm 4.0 17 17' CT sable palm 4.0 18 5' CT sable palm 4.0 19 5' CT sable palm 3.0 20 10' CT sable palm 4.0 21 10' CT sable palm 4.0 22 10' CT sable palm 4.0 23 9-,13- Norfolk Island pine 1.0 Comment: Co- dominant trunk with included bark. 24 14' CT sable palm 4.5 25 20' CT sable palm 4.5 26 18' CT sable palm 4.0 27 15" Australian pine (Casuarina ssp) 1.0 Comment: On the Florida EPPC's Invasive Plant Species List 28 18' CT sable palm 4.5 29 27" rubber tree (Ficus elastica) 2.0 30 19' CT sable palm 3.0 31 10" Australian pine 1.0 32 6" Australian pine 1.0 33 8" Australian pine 1.0 34 8" Australian pine 1.0 35 5" Australian pine 1.0 36 5" Australian pine 1.0 37 4" Australian pine 1.0 4 38 6" Australian pine 1.0 39 7" Australian pine 1.0 40 10" Australian pine 1.0 41 10" Australian pine 1.0 42 13' CT sable palm 3.0 43 20" Australian pine 1.0 44 18 ", quad Australian pine 1.0 45 12" Australian pine 1.0 46 7' sable palm 3.0 47 10 ", twin Australian pine 1.0 48 9 ", twin Australian pine 1.0 49 16" Australian pine 1.0 50 11 ", twin Australian pine 1.0 51 14" tri Australian pine 1.0 52 10" Australian pine 1.0 53 12" twin Australian pine 1.0 54 17" Australian pine 1.0 55 7' sable palm 4.0 56 14" laurel oak (Quercus lourifolia) 2.0 Comment: Co- dominant trunk with included bark. Moderate die -back, low energy tree. 57 4 ", 611, 9" Norfolk Island pine 1.0 58 18" carrotwood (Cupania anacardioide) 1.0 Comment: On the Florida EPPC's Invasive Plant Species List 59 20" live oak (Quercus virginiana) 4.0 5 60 18' CT sable palm 4.0 61 11' CT sable palm 4.0 62 7' CT queen palm 0.0 63 14' CT sable palm 4.0 64 5' CT sable palm 4.0 65 13' CT sable palm 4.0 66 8' CT sable palm 4.0 67 6' CT sable palm 4.0 68 10' CT sable palm 2.0 2 Y I I 1 I � �I j fpprox. Tree 0—pP - T9P I . !I ' 1 x le 1 a - i s•I - �,r - w• ir• - _ 56ba1 Pdlrin g cabal Palm 22 b 21 20 Sael Palm F.,abal Palm II 1 I I 1 1 23 24 I I 1: i8I Norfolk Leland Fine) • Sabel Palm � II, Sabel Palm • Sabel Palm I b Sabel Palm 25 t• 27 /-Australian Plna 26O Saba1 Palm I I1, • I I wo I I, 29 9 30 655axl Palm Sabel Palm 3635�5 bl Palm 39�6 32 64 411" , !ii r -33 4 r• 66 X34 S��tal Palm v 63 37O Sabal Palm 1 _738 1 II Australian Plna brovping 42 I II 5abalPolm 43 ¢ III I m■ w -� III 1 rw•�5 Z a II u Saba[ Palm ¢ Z I I' Australian Pine &roupinyJ 46 ¢ j°•' i I img 487 I I I 11 I I I i � �I 11111 coy I 18 +r•u• Sabe l — =- 16O• s0ba[ Sab al (3—n e n P d Palm Sabel Palm Palm • 5abol Palm O3 17 1 C i � 1 I�I I I ll I I II II I y Z � 1 I 5obol Palm Sabel Palm 4 I ! 1 1 e 1 III 1 II 1 1 Sabel Palm - ~ I III 11 1 It Sabel Palm 1 I 1 L1 g 11 1 .r• 13 9 II III 1 5a1ba1 Palm 5obal Palm I I 1 ir• 12 r• g S " I �11 _z Y I I' I 52 x• . oy-49 11 O cabal Palm - 9 T cabal P{ I O I I, GNeN'en Palm Australian Fine Grouping it 5 ,r• ,_ r 10 s r• 6 IY I I r xui a w I' r I I rw 501,01 Palm_____- _ — — OE.abal Palm _ — _ 77 -4 -- - - - ---I ir°ar"wD.m ,o`K it 621 SabalPalm Laurel Oak 3 51 ____ - - -- - - - -_ _ - - - - - - -- -- - - - - -- - Ic---- f -ii I , T -L�\ 55 - -__ - - - -- _ - - - - - -- — 1 Yj—.r r• 61 Sabal Palm 54, -r I! I I V Norfolk Leland Pine 1 i I� I Sabel Palm � �� I -' .•'' I _ _ w.. /_��- � I +eesrnm an.nm I I I I I O 60 Approx. Tree Gana Py _ Approx. Tree C o Py - T NP• TI' PE BA 758 I' Live Oak jam/ Norfolk Island Pine' I 59 ,, Carrot Hood l.. EXISTING TREE PROTECTION GENERAL NOTES EXISTING TREES AND PALMS WITHIN AND ADJACENT TO THE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION AND SPECIFIED TO REMAIN ARE TO BE PROTECTED THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS WITH TREE BARRICADES PER THE CITY OF CLEARWATER REQUIREMENTS OR MORE STRINGENT PER THESE PLANS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AN INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF ARBORIST (ISA) CERTIFIED ARBORIST WITH A MINIMUM OF 5 YEARS EXPERIENCE WITH SIMILAR PROJECTS, TO DIRECT APPROPRIATE PRUNING (ROOTS, BRANCHES) AND /OR OTHER TREATMENT NECESSARY TO ENSURE THE HEALTH, VIABILITY AND ATTRACTIVENESS OF I TREES TO REMAIN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CERTIFIED ARBORIST'S INSTRUCTIONS. PRUNING SHALL CONFORM TO ANSI A -300 PRUNING STANDARDS WITH FINAL SPECIFICATIONS TO BE APPROVED BY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE, PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. ALL TREE ROOTS EXISTING WITHIN IMPROVEMENT AREAS AND ORIGINATING FROM A PROTECTED TREE, SHALL BE SEVERED CLEAN AT THE LIMITS OF THE PRESERVED AREA WHERE INDICATED ON THE PLANS. ROOT PRUNING SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED BY MECHANICAL TRENCHER WITH SHARP BLADES AND UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION OF THE CERTIFIED ARBORIST. ROOT PRUNING SHALL MEET THE STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER AND ISA. Existing Tree Inventory Legend Existing Tree per Survey —Tree Number, Correspond to Report - 26 �Tree Species Sabel Palm "Aft LW--A gggm . °p N d � O j r a o - >v LL a i C O t� � v G (D CU � J co U �m LU c cu CL o° s O � N Qj Iv m Es +. O `o (D LL U EXISTING TREE INVENTORY 03/11/13 �� ET1 (7 C �m d na LEGEND �Op° m=8. w a- CABLE N PEDESTAL o - ELEVATION rr _ TIE HYIIRANT ,°. a 0- CR ATE NET -z w c I +] - PAYPNQE u m • - POYD POLE m m REMAIYED MATER METER G - REQAYED MATER VALVE G'' - SANITARY SEMEN MWK LE o - SKM - TELEPHONE PEDESTAL F. - VER IZON PEDESTAL N - MATER METER 50 - MATER VALVE — - GUY MME - OVEIKAD MASS U.G. OAS LIE - - UA SANITARY SEVER LK I.I.G. SANITARY SEVER LIVE PER UT TY YAP I.I.G. STUN SEVER LIVE - U.G. SEEN SEWER LIVE PER UIIUTY YAP - U.r MATER LIVE PER U1110 YAP W111 - AUSIRAUAN POE pro - BANYAN W& - OAK -r. - PALM ro - PK r• Existing Tree Inventory Legend Existing Tree per Survey —Tree Number, Correspond to Report - 26 �Tree Species Sabel Palm "Aft LW--A gggm . °p N d � O j r a o - >v LL a i C O t� � v G (D CU � J co U �m LU c cu CL o° s O � N Qj Iv m Es +. O `o (D LL U EXISTING TREE INVENTORY 03/11/13 �� ET1 r February 27, 2013 City of Clearwater P O Box 4748 Clearwater FL 33738 Subject: The Fairfield Marriott 105 unit hotel on 650 Esplanade (FLS2013- 02006) TO: Kevin Numberger We have been guests of the Five Palms condos for many years and stay 6 weeks to 2 months each year. We have heard about the proposed building going up across the street and want to provide some input. Though guests to Clearwater Beach we feel the Five Palms is our "second " home. The north end of the beach is so quant and charming with its "old world Florida" ambiance it seems that putting a huge hotel here is craziness! We cannot understand how you can possibly think about putting such a huge building in such a quant area. There is nothing even close to what you are proposing on this north end. A building that large would be totally out of character and destroy the type of tourism we experience here. We love our quiet and relaxed atmosphere. We believe that such a large "chain" hotel across the street will cause an enormous impact to traffic, bring noise pollution and potential parking issues. As we have been paying your tourism tax for many, many years, we feel our issues and concerns should be heard. Please build your behemoth somewhere else. Thank You, 131chard and Jennifer Smith,, i Ben acid Mary Francis Hancock d�tu and Pat Clemens <; Received MAR 0 8 1013 Planning & Development PENTHOUSE SHORES CONDOMINIUMS BOARD OF DIRECTORS 661 POINSETTIA AVE Clearwater Beach, FI 33767 March 4, 2013 William. Hildebrand President Penthouse Shores Condominium Association Dear Mr. Delk: Pursuant to the notice letter of February 15, 2013, regarding the application for flexible standard development approval at 650Bay Esplanade (FLS2013- 02006) owned by: Bay Esplanade Project LLQ I am writing you on behalf of the 30 owners of the Penthouse Shores Condominiums and stakeholders in the 650 Bay Esplanade project. We appreciate your department's role in enforcing the Old Florida District of Clearwater Beach requirements, and the desire to ensure that whatever project is finally approved for that vacant lot will properly reflect the scale and character of adjacent tourist and residential areas. We have reviewed the current application and. staff comments and agree that the proposed hotel for 650 Bay Esplanade has a design /look of a standard suburban - style hotel rather that a building design that incorporates the Florida vernacular or beach architectural elements required by the Old Florida District standards. Fur- ther, we also agree that the immediate surrounding uses are one to three story residential and overnight accommodations and the proposed 76 foot, 102 room hotel does not reflect the architectural scale and character of the Old Florida Dis- trict standards, especially considering the specific transactional area of tile pro- posed site is approximately 200 feet from Somerset Street and residential zoning. We encourage staff to continue to enforce the Old Florida District standards in hopes that the end design will reflect a sense of the appropriate character and architectural elements of our beach community neighborhood. and those building and residential designs located so close in proximity to the residential area. Thank you for your consideration of this information. Sin rely yours, William Hidlebrand AADDRESSn aADDRESS »,aADDRESS »oADDRESSP 4URLSD J PENTHOUSE SHORES CONDOMINIUMS BOARD OF DIRECTORS 661 POINSETTIA AVE Clearwater Beach, FI 33767 March 4, 2013 William Hildebrand President Penthouse Shores Condominium Association Dear Mr. Dell:: Pursuant to the notice letter of February 15, 2013, regarding the application for flexible standard development approval at 650Bay Esplanade (FLS2013- 02006) owned by: Bay Esplanade Project LLQ I am. writing you on behalf of the 30 oNvners of the Penthouse Shores Condominiums and stakeholders in the 650 Bay Esplanade project. We appreciate your department's role in enforcing the Old Florida District of Clearwater Beach requirements, and the desire to ensure that whatever project is fmally approved for that vacant lot will properly reflect the scale and character of adjacent tourist and residential areas. We have reviewed the current application and staff comments and agree that the proposed hotel for 650 Bay Esplanade has a design /look of a standard suburban - style hotel rather that a building design that uicorporates the Florida vernacular or beach architectural elements required by the Old Florida District standards. Fur- ther, we also agree that the immediate surrounding uses are one to three story residential and overnight accommodations and the proposed 76 foot, 102 room hotel does not reflect the architectural scale and character of the Old Florida Dis- trict standards, especially considering the specific transactional area of the pro- posed site is approximately 200 feet from Somerset Street and residential zoning. We encourage staff to continue to enforce the Old Florida District standards in hopes that the end design will reflect a sense of the appropriate character and architectural elements of our beach community neighborhood and those building and residential designs located so close in proximity to the residential area. Thank you for your consideration of this information. Sir cerely yours, William Hidlebrand (ADDRESS)) aADDRESS »,(ADDRESSnaADDRESSP WRLSa Nurnberger, Kevin From: Suzanne [manager @fivepalmscondo.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2013 5:16 PM To: Nurnberger, Kevin Subject: Objection to FLS2013- 02006 -Bay Esplanade Project LLC Kevin, I object to the proposed hotel at 650 Bay Esplanade. My name is Suzanne Keys, and I am the Property Manager at Five Palms which is located at: 673 Bay Esplanade. I have been in this position for nearly 3 years, and in the office 5 days a week. I Since I witness the traffic on Bay Esplanade, I feel I can give a pretty accurate picture of the situation at hand. Safety Concerns - we already have a lot of traffic on Bay Esplanade. It isn't just the residential traffic who own homes nearby, but it is the tourists who rent cars, the Trolley every 15 minutes, cabs, garbage trucks, cops, people who bicycle, city vehicles, etc. It is a VERY BUSY road to travel on. Since there is no sidewalk, people are always walking in the street. There is also a curved road. This curve is dangerous when people are all over the street. Vehicles drive fast (including the Trolleys), and I have seen so many accidents as cars have backed out of Five Palms parking lot, I've seen people almost run over, etc. To build such a hotel, would mean more traffic, more accidents, more congestion. If even 1/2 of the 102 proposed units were booked, traffic is going to be big big problem! Parking - We have 19 Condos and 19 parking spots. As it is, a Guest will have to occasionally have to park in the street if somebody has a visitor over. It's not uncommon to see many cars parked down the street from other hotels /motels. This causes a problem on Bay Esplanade because the street becomes even more narrow. Again, with no side walk on either side, people are in the street, the road is narrow and we have all sorts of vehicles speeding down the road. I understand the proposed hotel is suppose to get it's own parking garage. However, there is a good chance that Guests at the proposed hotel (or visitors to those Guests) would attempt to park at Five Palms parking spots since it is right across the street. With our limited parking, this would absolutely cause issues and towing concerns. If they are planning 102 units, parking is going to be a problem! Loss of Business to Five Palms - The majority of our Guests have been coming to Five Palms for over 10 years. They love the North end of the Beach for the quiet and low key feeling they get, and keep coming back for that reason. They do not want a mega hotel across the street to interfere with the peace and quiet they love. Most of the Guests are happy to hang -out by the pool or stay on the property. Our elderly Guests range from 65 - 89. They are in fear of what a large hotel chain will bring - more noise, more people, and possibly more crime. Quality of Life - All the other hotels /motels in the area are no higher than 3 -story. The proposed hotel would be 7 feet and then some to allow for code. It will be an eyesore to the other neighboring buildings to see something so high up. It will be too big for the parcel and too big for the neighborhood. A hotel like the proposed one should be directly on the Beach or further down by the South side. It just doesn't fit with the existing area on the North side. It doesn't matter how many Palm trees are planted or what landscaping they propose, the fact that it will be so tall, so wide, and dominate the property will make it look horrible. �- " Once, again, I object to this hotel proposal, and speaking to all my Guests who are_currentfy here for the "in- season" are all very upset that such a large hotel chain would attempt to encroach on such a quiet and peaceful community. PLEASE DO NOT LET THIS HAPPEN ! ! - Suzanne Keys (727- 443 -5272) Nurnberger, Kevin From: clittlefield @cmpmail.com Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2013 6:05 PM To: Nurnberger, Kevin Subject: Fw: Bay Esplanade Development Proposal Mr. Numberger, Thank you for notifying me about the proposed development on Bay Esplanade in Clearwater Beach. As the principal owner of #201 at Five Palms Condominium right across the street, I am advocating rejection of the proposal as is way too large a development for this area. The proposed setback exemptions are unreasonable and damaging to the value of nearby properties. Please reject this proposal and consider more appropriate use of this property. Thank you! Christopher Littlefield Sno -Bird Properties G'� February 26, 2013 City of Clearwater P 0 Box 4748 Clearwater FL 33738 RE: Proposed 105 unit hotel on 650 Esplanade (FLS2013- 02006) Att: Kevin Numberger My wife and I have coming to the Five Palms for many years and stay for 2 months each year. Upon hearing about the proposed building going up across the street, we felt the need to share our thoughts and concerns. While we are guests to Clearwater Beach we feel like the Five Palms is our "second " home. The north end of the beach is so charming with its "old world Florida" ambiance, friendly people and relaxed setting. We cannot understand how you can possibly think about putting such a huge building in such a quant area. We didn't think this area was even zoned for such a commercial building. There is nothing even close to what you are proposing on this north end. How will something like that impact our Five Palms stay and the other little "mom and pop" condos and hotels? We feel they would suffer greatly, as would the many residents who live on this end that have become our friends. We who stay at the Five Palms each year are retired and of a vintage age. We love our quiet and low key atmosphere. We believe that such a large "chain" hotel across the street will cause an enormous impact to traffic, bring noise pollution and.potential parking issues. It does NOT fit at the location you propose. Sincer ly, f L m and Nicky Co. ton Received MAR 0 6 2013 Planning & Development February 28, 2013 City of Clearwater P 0 Box 4748 Clearwater FL 33738 RE: Proposed 105 unit hotel on 650 Esplanade (FLS2013- 02006) Att: Kevin Numberger As a long time returning Guest at Five Palms Condos, we were most distressed to hear this year of the proposed Fairfield Inn Marriot (105 units). The reason for our continued returns to the NORTH end of the beach is for the quiet and lovely old beach ambiance, and friendliness of the neighborhood, which is made up of smaller hotels, smaller homes and condos. We can't even image some huge, overbearing chain of a hotel coming to this quaint area. It is better suited with the other like hotels on South Beach or on the Beach side. There isn't like this on this side of the island. Please reconsider this type of hotel on the North side on such a small piece of land that doesn't fit into the lifestyle over here. Sincerely, r- A Dean Sukus, Annual Guest at Five Palms (Unit #104) Received MAR 0 6 2013 Planning & Development WA JAMES M. BEARDSLEY 661 Poinsettia Avenue, Apt. 202 Clearwater Beach, FL 33767 -1535 (727) 447 -2661 Jbeardsley60(&-aol.com February 26, 2013 Mr. Kevin Nurnberger City of Clearwater Planning & Development Department :P. O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758 -4748 Dear Mr. Nurnberger: For 26 years I have been the owner of an apartment in the 30 -unit building located at 661 Poinsettia Avenue in Clearwater Beach. I recently received a letter from your department regarding a proposed hotel to be built on the lot next to our building. I have also seen drawings of the hotel building that is proposed. I am writing this letter to express my strong objection to this ,project for the following reasons: 1. A 65 -foot hotel with 102 rooms would be extremely out of place in our neighborhood, which presently consists of small apartment buildings and motels. There is nothing remotely close to this type of hotel on our side of Mandalay Avenue. 2. The proposed building just to the south of our building would entirely block the sunlight that we presently enjoy. How would you like to see a 65 -foot building go up 15 feet from your house? 3. Outside activities at the hotel, such as a pool and outside drinking and eating facilities, will cause noise into the late hours. 4. The proposed setback and stepback aspects of the plan appear to be insufficient. 5. Although there is a parking garage in the building the presence of a large hotel would certainly result in parking on the street in adjoining areas, where parking is presently prohibited, in order to avoid having to pay to park in the ramp. 6. "Borrowing 55 rooms from. the Hotel Density Reserve seems to be a device that should not be appropriate to this situation since there is nothing remotely as large as this proposed use m our neighborhood. Received MAR 0 6 2013 Planning & Development 7. Adding the occupants of 102 rooms to our area during a period such as Spring Break would certainly be disruptive to our neighborhood. 8. There are numerous parcels of vacant property on Clearwater Beach that would be more appropriate for this type of development, particularly in the south end of the Beach. V M. Zoe �•f/�f'V.k 1 • tl N �. +1 N..a.� V+..+� 4M1 13 P14 3 1 [kEC i Residential subdivision M AA r. 1''�Xt-V ivy t*1-3U c Vn 6 e. v`,�, C. �aNL 4,L;"'A c - ^.3`�'w,,^�"„�•«i, '.w.�w!' -I.N � 7�T��l,�IfT�Ei��. fit l�. {f�, ;3fi�}�3i✓:1If73�t.lji ��! F1 ! itl1��►i! c� Nurnberger, Kevin From: William Letourneau [letoursch @aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 3:18 PM To: Nurnberger, Kevin Subject: Objection to the Proposed Building at 650 Bay Esplanade FLS 2013 -02006 Dear Kevin, My husband (William Letourneau) and l ( Debora Hirsch) have resided at Penthouse Shores, 661 Poinsettia Ave # 305 for 7 1/2 years. We have serious concerns about the applicability of the proposed hotel. As a resident of Penthouse Shores our unit, ( along with # 205 & #105 who are also residents) is directly north of the proposed hotel. All our windows face south which means we will be barely 10 feet from the parking ramp and a concrete building ....no sun, no trees, no street, no island setting, no air. Wow, we could nearly reach out and touch some one as they drive up the parking ramp. We will have noise, lights shining in our home: living room, lanai, dining room & bedroom plus the noise and odors. We chose this location, 22 years ago, to be our retirement home because of the Old World Florida ambiance. Friendly atmosphere, idyllic setting, low level building and a nice mix of residents and tourists. It continues to be quiet and low key. At any time of the day one can see folks strolling or biking up and down Bay Esplanade. An increase in traffic would surely jeopardise the pedestrian friendliness and safety of Bay Esplanade. * Can Bay Esplanade even support such increased traffic? * What impact will a 102 room hotel have on the annual occupancy percentage of the "mom and pop" condos and motels in this surrounding area who are already struggling? * Why is an additional 55 rooms possible? That is more than double the amount alotted. * How will the Fire dept be able to handle, say a fire on the north side of the hotel? There is no back access indicated. • What about the infrastructure; water, sewer etc.? • How will the building process affect the integrity of our structure? • Has an arborist been out to examine the trees on the property? There are several that we have been told are protected and cannot be removed. • Where is there anything like this proposal anywhere on the north end much less on Clearwater Beach? • How much will our property be DEVALUED if this hotel is allowed to be built? We understand that the proposed Hampton, on south beach, was denied because its 116 rooms on .8 acres was too big for that commercial area. How can it be possible for a 102 rooms on .9 acres be "ok" in a non commercial, more residential area? We understand that the Mariott would like to build, how about on the south beach with the other`' like hotels. There is a very large track of land by the Sand Key bridge just begging for a builder. NsN V • ' G Fi'S� Please feel free to call us .... 651.459.4336. Thank You! William Letourneau Debby Hirsch February 28, 2013 City of Clearwater P O Box 4748 Clearwater FL 33738 RE: Proposed 105 unit hotel on 650 Esplanade (FL52013- 02006) Att: Kevin Numberger I come to the Five Palms each year and stay for 2 months each year. After hearing about the proposed building going up across the street, I felt the need to write you. The people who stay at Five Palms each year are retired and elderly. We love our quiet and low key atmosphere. We believe that such a large "chain" hotel across the street will cause an enormous amount of traffic, bring noise and potential parking issues. There is nothing like it anywhere on this end of Clearwater s000 PLEASE don't let this building be built at this end of Clearwater Beach! It would seem to be better suited with the other large hotels on south beach. Sincerely, Don & Judy Thompson 1 � 0 G c CITY OF CLEARWATER Planning and Development Department POST OFFICE Box 4748 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 IL U. CAPRI MOTEL CONDO ASSN 55 SOMERSET ST APT 3 CLEARWATER FL 33767 01"6523479 .360 40 02/21/2013 tizeed From 33634 US POSTAGE TF RET"r'N "' SENDER UNAKLL I'U t-UKWAKD SC: 33758474848 *2474-04048-24-20 m1 13 1f:hZt %b W? i:M= I !.A C I TY O F. LEARWATER. �= PLANvrl\ci & DF,VLLQP \9l ?N1 DEPARI'bI1i11' POST OFi-ja Boa 4748, 0rAx,vwr x ft6RU)A 33758 f748 MUVICIP-A1.,SLR\ICES BuaDING, 100 SOL 11f� "x'i: AVEVr1L, i LLAx \ @A1'fx; FLORIDA 33756 ArERy,r, TFLEPHo (7275 562 436 7 Fax ( 727) 562-4865 February 15, 2013 RE: NOTICE OF FILING AN APPLICATION FOR FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AT 650 BAY ESPLANADE (FLS2013- 02006); OWNED BY: BAY ESPLANADE PROJECT LLC To Surrounding Property Owners: As a property owner within 500 feet of 650 BAY ESPLANADE, the City of Clearwater Planning and Development Department gives notice that an application has been submitted for Flexible Standard Development application to permit a 102 -room overnight accommodation use in the Tourist (T) District with a lot area of 41,232 square feet (0.95 acres), lot widths of 104 feet along Bay Esplanade (east); 289.98 feet along Bay Esplanade (south) and 182.06 feet along Poinsettia Avenue (west); a front (east) setback of 15 feet (to building); a front (south) setback of 15 feet (to building); a front (west) setback of 15 feet (to building) and 13 feet (to concrete pad); a side (north) setback of 10 feet (to building); a building height of 65 feet (from Base Flood Elevation to flat roof); and 127 off - street parking spaces, pursuant to the Community Development Code Sectiod'2 -802.M 'and the Old Florida District standards in Beach by Design; and an increase in the maximum density through the allocation of 55 overnight accommodation units from the Hotel Density Reserve created pursuant to Beach by Design, as well as a reduction to the foundation landscaping along Bay Esplanade from five feet to zero feet and an increase in the number of palm trees and accent trees in lieu of shade trees, as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program, pursuant to the Community Development Code Section 3- 1202.G. On March 7, 2013, the Development Review Committee (composed of the City's professional staff) will review and determine whether the application demonstates compliance with the City's Community Development Code. Following that review and determination, the Planning Director will issue a Development Order approving, approving with conditions, or denying the application. The earliest date that the City will make a decision on the application will be March 7, 2013. The City encourages you to participate in the review of this application. You may contact me at 562- 4567x25^2 or via email at Kevin :Nurnberger @myclearvlater.com for further information, visit our office to review the files and /or submit written comments to be considered in the City review of the application. Please be advised that the applicant may submit additional or new information regarding this case which you may review during regular business hours. However, no further notice will be provided to you should the application be amended. An appeal of the decision of the Planning Director may be initiated by the applicant or property owners within the required notice area who present competent substantial evidence at, or prior to, the Development Review Committee meeting on March 7, 2013. An appeal must be filed, including an appeal fee, with the City Clerks Office within seven days of the issuance of the Development Order. Thank you for your interest in the City of Clearwater's development review process. You may access the Planning and Development Department through the City's website: www.myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, 2/15/2013 n n EQ(i:1L �:�1PLOYtdli \T .l \.D ��:FFixbIA "rTPG ACCION ;i�1PL01'ER Letter Oi Notification Nurnberger, Kevin From: JGehrand @aol.com Sent: Friday, March 01, 2013 4:16 PM To: Nurnberger, Kevin Subject: Fairfield Marriot Kevin: I have a small condo unit on Bay Esplanade across the street from a proposed Fairfield Marriot. At 7 stories tall and 102 units per acre with 127 parking spaces, I can not believe this is even being considered. This area is all low rise, low density small units. This would be completely against the character of this part of Clearwater Beach. There are areas of the Beach where this would be appropriate and supported, but not in a small neighborhood community part of the North Beach. Jerry Gehrand Nurnberger, Kevin From: Cathy Fuller [cfuller3 @tampabay.rr.com] Sent: Sunday, March 03, 2013 1:43 PM To: Nurnberger, Kevin Subject: FW: Proposed 102 Unit hotel at 650 Bay Esplanade Kevin, My name is Bob Fuller and I own (along with my brother Dan) property at the Five Palms Condomotel at 673 Bay Esplanade (Unit #109). I understand that an application has been submitted for a permit to build a 102 unit hotel at 650 Bay Esplanade on a .95 acre parcel. As part of this process a request FOR MORE THAN HALF of these units (55) are to come from the Hotel Density Reserve as well as compromises to other beautification requirements for this project. We (my brother and 1) oppose this approval for the following reasons: • Neighborhood safety concerns - the neighborhood has both small hotel and private homes where this hotel is proposed. Many people who stay at these hotels (and the homeowners) like the ability to walk to the nearby restaurants and shops. The increased traffic puts these pedestrians at risk with the lack of sidewalks in most of the adjourning streets. At night, there is also many dimly lit sections of road that will also put pedestrians at risk. Decrease in quality of life / risk to property values - for the homeowners in the area, the smaller hotels have been able to coexist with little quality of life intrusion (low number of units, no "destination" amenities like a restaurant or bar). For many hotels this size on Clearwater Beach, there is usually a restaurant or bar in the hotel. In the neighborhood where this project is proposed, an amenity like a restaurant or bar away from Mandalay Ave. would clearly bring additional traffic / noise pollution to an otherwise quiet neighborhood. With this kind of change, the people who stay at the current smaller hotels for the absence of this activity will certainly look for other places to stay (lowering not only the property values of the residential property but the commercial properties as well). Possible legal concerns - the recent denial of the application for the property at 655 S. Gulfview would seemingly set a precedent of "too many rooms on too small a property ". This subjective claim would seemingly open the city to a legal question of "what does this mean" if this property is approved. The city's professional staff had already declared the previous request as within all requirements to be approved by the city council. If 116 rooms on .8 acres is too big for the site and 102 rooms for a .95 acre site is not, what is the limit? If you have any questions - please call at 727 796 5186 Bob Fuller 673 Bay Esplanade, #109 Nurnberger, Kevin From: Valerie Vasil [vvasil @tampabay.rr.com] Sent: Sunday, March 03, 2013 7:34 PM To: Nurnberger, Kevin Subject: Notice of Filing an Application for Flexible Standard Development Approval at 650 Bay Esplanade (FLS2013- 02006); Owned by: Bay Esplanade Project LLC March 3, 2013 Mr. Kevin Nurnberger City of Clearwater Planning & Development Department E -mail: Kevin. Nurnberger .myclearwater.com Re: Notice of Filing an Application for Flexible Standard Development Approval at 650 Bay Esplanade (FLS2013- 02006); Owned by: Bay Esplanade Project LLC Dear Mr. Kevin Nurnberger, City of Clearwater Planning & Development Department: I am Valerie Vasil and a property owner at 673 Bay Esplanade. I own 1 unit ( #106) of the 19 -unit "Five Palms Condominium Motel' which is located across the street from the above mentioned proposed 102 unit development site. I am oppose to the above mentioned Application and Development for reasons including: • Adding so many units, of a big -chain style motel, can destroy the quiet ambiance that is present at the north end of the beach (enjoyed by residential neighbors and renters of small motels). • Renters have personally told me that they like the north beach because it is quieter and less expensive to rent - something within their price range. • Parking is already a problem in that area with people "not- staying" at Five Palms Condo Motel (5PCM) parking their cars at the outdoor 5PCM free parking spaces (taking it from those who stay at 5PCM). Adding a 102 unit development nearby will most likely exacerbate that problem (even if it is half- rented) with their visitors also looking for a place to park. • This big new development could impact smaller older motels making them less attractive to stay. Hence, lowering their income potential and viability to survive. I thought it was the intention of the City of Clearwater to keep the "Ma & Pop" / small motels alive in the area. Thank you for your time considering this correspondence. I remain Respectfully Yours, Valerie J. Vasil Property Owner: Five Palms Condominium Motel, Unit #106 673 Bay Esplanade Clearwater Beach, FL 33767 Resident address: 711 Osceola Rd Belleair, FL 33756 Home Phone: 727 - 584 -3767 Home Email: Vvasil(- )tampabay.rr.com Nurnberger, Kevin From: Randy Keys [rdkeys813 @yahoo.com] Sent: Friday, March 01, 2013 9:51 AM To: Nurnberger, Kevin Subject: fairfield marriot sir - I would like to register my opposition to the building of the Fairfield Marriot on Bay Esplanade Clearwater Beach. As a property owner in that quiet neighborhood it will destroy the very reason we own there. We do not want a commercial mega structure in our residential area. None of my neighbors approve of this hotel being built. Keep the big hotels on the beach and out of the residential neighborhoods. The small established motels in the neighborhood are enough. Randall D. Keys 673 Bay Esplanade C Nurnberger, Kevin From: anthony mayes [antpmayes @hotmail.com] Sent: Friday, March 01, 2013 4:15 AM To: Nurnberger, Kevin Subject: Fwd: Objection to proposed building at 650 Bay Esplanade FLS2013 -02006 >> Dear Kevin, >> We have today received your letter in regards to the proposal of a 65 feet, 102 unit building with parking for 127 vehicles. >> We are from the UK and own condo 108 at the Five Palms Condominium 673 Bay Esplanade. - >> We chose this area for its idyllic position, surrounded by low level properties, unlike the giants on the South beach. >> Our little rear garden and patio area will be completely shadowed and overlooked by this giant of a building. >> Surely this cannot possibly be acceptable ? >> The every day single person would probably have had a job to even get permission to build an outbuilding for their properties ! >> How will these tiny little roads be able to deal with so much traffic and what about the pollution and noise ? >> I guess we should have seen this coming when you allowed Hooters to be built down the road along with the relocation of the Hilton, who's land is still standing vacant. Why not use this nice open land for this project, close to the bridge and plenty of space. >> PLEASE LEAVE NORTH BEACH ALONE !!! >> Sure it's nice to have the busy South beach for those who like that sort of resort but why take away the only little gem left in Clearwater, there are more than enough rooms for tourists wishing to stay amongst the action on the South side. >> We have a lot of elderly guests who return year after year who are extremely upset by this development. >> We hope we are not wasting our time with our objections as it is already a done deal, we are not only owners we are also tourists from the UK who can see that this is a real mistake. To us, it's like putting a block of flats on the middle on the moors, please please do not do it. >> Anthony PD Mayes & Barbara M Goodacre -Mayes 1 CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT POST OnICE Box 4748, Ctraxv ATEx, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MuNicIPAL SExNices Bun DING, 100 Sourm M5"xTLE AVENUE, CLE.K ATER, ftoxIDA 33756 T iFPHO:NE (727) 5624567 FAx (727) 5624865 February 15; 2013 RE: NOTICE OF FILING AN APPLICATION FOR FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AT 650 BAY ESPLANADE (FLS2013- 02006); OWNED BY: BAY ESPLANADE PROJECT LLC To Surrounding Property Owners: As a property owner within 500 feet of 650 BAY ESPLANADE, the City of Clearwater Planning and Development Department gives notice that an application has been submitted for Flexible Standard Development application to permit a 102 -room overnight accommodation use in the Tourist (T) District with a lot area of 41,232 square feet (0.95 acres), lot widths of 104 feet along Bay Esplanade (east); 289.98 feet along Bay Esplanade (south) and 182.06 feet along Poinsettia Avenue (west); a front (east) setback of 15 feet (to building); a front (south) setback of 15 feet (to building); a front (west) setback of 15 feet (to building) and 13 feet (to concrete pad); a side (north) setback of 10 feet (to building); a building height of 65 feet (from Base Flood Elevation to flat roof); and 127 off - street parking spaces, pursuant to the Community Development Code Section 2 -802.M and the Old Florida District standards in Beach by Design; and an increase in the maximum density through the allocation of 55 overnight accommodation units from the Hotel Density Reserve created pursuant to Beach by Design, as well as a reduction to the foundation landscaping along Bay Esplanade from five feet to zero feet and an increase in the number of palm trees and accent trees in lieu of shade trees, as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program, pursuant to the Community Development Code Section 3- 1202.G. On March 7, 2013, the Development Review Committee (composed of the City's professional staff) will review and determine whether the application demonstates compliance with the City's Community Development Code. Following that review and determination, the Planning Director will issue a Development Order approving, approving with conditions, or denying the application. The earliest date that the City will make a decision on the application will be March 7, 2013. The City encourages you to participate in the review of this application. You may contact me at 562- 4567x2502 or via email at Kevin .Nurnberger @myclearwater.com for further information, visit our office to review the files and /or submit written comments to be considered in the City review of the application. Please be advised that the applicant may submit additional or new information regarding this case which you may review during regular business hours. However, no further notice will be provided to you should the application be amended. An appeal of the decision of the Planning Director may be initiated by the applicant or property owners within the required notice area who present competent substantial evidence at, or prior to, the Development Review Committee meeting on March 7, 2013. An appeal must be filed, including an appeal fee, with the City Clerks Office within seven days of the issuance of the Developrpent Order. Thank you for your interest in the City of Clearwater's development review process. You may access the Planning and Development Department through the City's website: www.myclearwate,.com. Sincerely yours, 2/15/2013 Letler_Of_Notif—tion EQu; +I. 54ri.oYIN:r:Nr AND AFnii`IATn7F, ACTTON EwI.oYFR ,t 1066363 ONTARIO LTD BEARDSLEY, JAMES M CURRENT OCCUPANT 152 CLARENDON ST 15 MAYFAIR LN 0 BAY ESPLANADE SOUTHAMPTON ON NOH 21-0 CA BUFFALO NY 14201 CLEARWATER FL 33755 673 BAY ESPLANADE LLC GPTLLC 1596 SHIRLEY PL LARGO FL 33770 BERETA, DEBORAH A BERETA, GERARD J 311 ARLINGTON ST INKSTER MI 48141 ALBRECHT, YVETTE BOERNER, SUSANA B CHURCH FARM BARN - -- CHURCH LANE 112 S LAUBER WAY CHELTENHAM GLOS GL51 4TQ UK TAMPA FL 33609 AMERPOL HOTELS & MOTELS INC 457 S ELLIS ST BENSENVILLE IL 60106 ANGO, RICHARD 836 MANDALAY AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 ARMBRUSTER, JOHN 661 POINSETTIA AVE APT 209 CLEARWATER FL 33767 BAY ESPLANADE HOLDINGS LLC 107 MASTERS LN SAFETY HARBOR FL 34695 BAY ESPLANADE PROJECT LLC 305 CAMBRIDGE ST STE 3 CAMBRIDGE MA 02141 BAYESPLANADE.COM LLC 627 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 CAPRI MOTEL CONDO ASSN 55 SOMERSET ST APT 3 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CENTRUM TARGOWE PTAK S A 95 030 RZGOW UL RZEMIESINICZA 35 NR PL CENTRUM TARGOWE PTAK S A 95 -030 RZGOW UL RZEMIESINICZA 35 PL CENTRUM TARGOWE PTAK S A UL. RZEMIESLNICZA 35 RZGOW 95 -030 PL CHMELA, EVA E CHMELA, WALTER F 10 COURTWOOD PL TORONTO ON M2K 1Z9 CA CIUCEVICH, JOSEPH 736 BRUCE AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 CURRENT OCCUPANT 0 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 CURRENT OCCUPANT 0 POINSETTIA AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 CURRENT OCCUPANT 0 POINSETTIA AVE # 132 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CURRENT OCCUPANT 0 SOMERSET ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 CURRENT OCCUPANT 45 SOMERSET ST CLEARWATER FL 33767 CURRENT OCCUPANT 50 ROYAL WAY CLEARWATER FL 33767 CURRENT OCCUPANT 54 SOMERSET ST CLEARWATER FL 33767 CURRENT OCCUPANT 55 SOMERSET ST # 1 CLEARWATER FL 33767 BAYESPLANADE.COM LLC CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 627 BAY ESPLANDE 0 55 SOMERSET ST # 2 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 55 SOMERSET ST # 3 643 BAY ESPLANADE. 648 POINSETTIA AVE # 106 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 55 SOMERSET ST # 4 645 BAY ESPLANADE 648 POINSETTIA AVE # 107 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 55 SOMERSET ST # 5 647 BAY ESPLANADE 648 POINSETTIA AVE # 108 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT, CURRENT OCCUPANT 55 SOMERSET ST # 6 647 MANDALAY AVE 648 POINSETTIA AVE # 109 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 60 SOMERSET ST 648 POINSETTIA AVE 648 POINSETTIA AVE # 110 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 625 BAY ESPLANADE 648 POINSETTIA AVE # 101 648 POINSETTIA AVE # 111 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 629 BAY ESPLANADE 648 POINSETTIA AVE # 102 648 POINSETTIA AVE # 112 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 635 BAY ESPLANADE 648 POINSETTIA AVE # 103 648 POINSETTIA AVE # 114 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 637 BAY ESPLANADE 648 POINSETTIA AVE # 104 648 POINSETTIA AVE # 115 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 64 SOMERSET ST 648 POINSETTIA AVE # 105 648 POINSETTIA AVE # 116 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 648 POINSETTIA AVE # 117 648 POINSETTIA AVE # 127 648 POINSETTIA AVE # 137 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 648 POINSETTIA AVE # 118 648 POINSETTIA AVE # 128 648 POINSETTIA AVE # 138 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 648 POINSETTIA AVE # 119 648 POINSETTIA AVE # 129 648 POINSETTIA AVE # 139 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 648 POINSETTIA AVE # 120 648 POINSETTIA AVE # 130 648 POINSETTIA AVE # 140 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 648 POINSETTIA AVE # 121 648 POINSETTIA AVE # 131 648 POINSETTIA AVE # 141 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 648 POINSETTIA AVE # 122 648 POINSETTIA AVE # 132 648 POINSETTIA AVE # 142 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 648 POINSETTIA AVE # 123 648 POINSETTIA AVE # 133 65 SOMERSET ST CLEARWATER FL 33767 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 648 POINSETTIA AVE # 124 648 POINSETTIA AVE # 134 651 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 648 POINSETTIA AVE # 125 648 POINSETTIA AVE # 135 653 MANDALAY AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 648 POINSETTIA AVE # 126 648 POINSETTIA AVE # 136 655 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 657 BAY ESPLANADE 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 109 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 209 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CURRENT OCCUPANT 657 MANDALAY AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 CURRENT OCCUPANT 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 101 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CURRENT OCCUPANT 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 102 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CURRENT OCCUPANT 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 103 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CURRENT OCCUPANT 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 104 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CURRENT OCCUPANT 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 105 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CURRENT OCCUPANT 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 106 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CURRENT OCCUPANT 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 107 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CURRENT OCCUPANT 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 110 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CURRENT OCCUPANT 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 201 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CURRENT OCCUPANT, 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 202 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CURRENT OCCUPANT 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 203 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CURRENT OCCUPANT 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 204 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CURRENT OCCUPANT 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 205 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CURRENT OCCUPANT 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 206 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CURRENT OCCUPANT 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 207 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CURRENT OCCUPANT 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 210 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CURRENT OCCUPANT 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 301 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CURRENT OCCUPANT 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 302 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CURRENT OCCUPANT 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 303 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CURRENT OCCUPANT 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 304 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CURRENT OCCUPANT 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 305 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CURRENT OCCUPANT 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 306 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CURRENT OCCUPANT 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 307 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 108 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 208 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 308 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 309 673 BAY ESPLANADE #103 692 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CURRENT OCCUPANT 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 310 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CURRENT OCCUPANT 663 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 CURRENT OCCUPANT 665 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 CURRENT OCCUPANT 665 POINSETTIA AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 CURRENT OCCUPANT 667 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 CURRENT OCCUPANT 668 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 CURRENT OCCUPANT 672 POINSETTIA AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 CURRENT OCCUPANT 673 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 CURRENT OCCUPANT 673 BAY ESPLANADE # 101 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CURRENT OCCUPANT 673 BAY ESPLANADE # 104 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CURRENT OCCUPANT 673 BAY ESPLANADE # 105 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CURRENT OCCUPANT 673 BAY ESPLANADE # 108 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CURRENT OCCUPANT 673 BAY ESPLANADE # 201 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CURRENT OCCUPANT 693 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 DE NUNZIO GROUP LLC 305 CAMBRIDGE ST STE 3 CAMBRIDGE MA 02141 DEAN REAL ESTATE INV INC 647 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 DIDOMIZIO INVESTMENTS INC 648 POINSETTIA AVE N CLEARWATER FL 33767 CURRENT OCCUPANT DOM, MARY 673 BAY ESPLANADE # 202 TANGAS, GUS CLEARWATER FL 33767 65 SOMERSET ST CLEARWATER FL 33767 CURRENT OCCUPANT E B C 0 LLC 673 BAY ESPLANADE # 207 145 BAYVIEW DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 BELLEAIR FL 33756 CURRENT OCCUPANT EPIC HOLDINGS SOUTH 673 BAY ESPLANADE # 209 139 BAYSIDE DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CURRENT OCCUPANT EYLER, DONALD C 685 BAY ESPLANADE 701 CLEARBROOKE CT CLEARWATER FL 33767 VANDALIA OH 45377 CURRENT OCCUPANT EYLER, DONALD C 689 BAY ESPLANADE EYLER, DANIEL N CLEARWATER FL 33767 701 CLEARBROOKE CT VANDALIA OH 45377 FIVE PALM CONDO ASSN INC KELLEY, PAUL LONG, MARIAN C 673 BAY ESPLANADE KELLEY, TRACEY 661 POINSETTIA AVE APT 104 CLEARWATER FL 33767 667 BAY ESPLANDE CLEARWATER FL 33767 CLEARWATER FL 33767 ELKRIDGE MD 21075 FOLEY, CATHERINE G KEYS, RANDALL D M M M HOMECARE LLC 661 POINSETTIA AVE APT 108 4014 W MULLEN AVE 5801 ULMERTON RD STE 200 CLEARWATER FL 33767 TAMPA FL 33609 CLEARWATER FL 33760 FOLINO, SERGIO KIELMANN, LOTHAR E MAHONEY, STEVEN T 181 TILFORD RD KIELMANN, WENDY MAHONEY, LETIZIA OAKVILLE ON L61- 4Z2 CA 35154 LEON ST 5343 GROVEMONT DR LIVONIA MI 48150 ELKRIDGE MD 21075 FORLINI FAMILY REV LIVING KROMER, JOHN MAVITY, LEON L TRUST KROMER, JANET MAVITY, LEON L THE REM FORLINI, DOMENICO G THE 14629 GALT LAKE DR 661 POINSETTIA AVE APT 307 808 MANDALAY AVE TAMPA FL 33626 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CLEARWATER FL 33767 FULLER, ROBERT A JR KRUEGER, MARGARET E MAYES, ANTHONY FULLER, DANIEL C PO BOX 20067 GOODACRE - MAYES, BARBARA 2114 CENTERVIEW CT S ST PETERSBURG FL 33742 1 SCHOOL ROAD CLEARWATER FL 33759 HALSTEAD ESSEX C09 3NR UK G S J FL INVESTMENT INC LA QUALE, GERARDO MC FADDEN, ARLENE S 1004 US HIGHWAY 19 N STE 102 LA QUALE, AMELIA P MC FADDEN, ROBERT G HOLIDAY FL 34691 594 MAIN ST 661 POINSETTIA AVE APT 204 EAST GREENWICH RI 02818 CLEARWATER FL 33767 GEVERS, THEODOOR LABRICCIOSA, ELENA MIRANDA, ALPHONSE AERTS, DENISE 653 MANDALAY AVE 2710 HIBISCUS DR W 661 POINSETTIA AVE APT 201 CLEARWATER FL 33767 BELLEAIR BEACH FL 33786 CLEARWATER FL 33767 HAYS, WILLIAM D LENTRICCHIA, KARIN S LIVING MONACO RESORT CONDO ASSN INC 661 POINSETTIA AVE APT 304 TRUST 648 POINSETTIA AVE N CLEARWATER FL 33767 LENTRICCHIA, KARIN S THE CLEARWATER FL 33767 661 POINSETTIA AVE APT 303 CLEARWATER FL 33767 HILDEBRAND, WILLIAM 0 JR LETOURNEAU, WILLIAM T MORRISON, GEORGE ROBERT ALBE 661 POINSETTIA AVE APT 107 HIRSCH, DEBORA A 4300 RUE ST AMBROISE # A604 CLEARWATER FL 33767 661 POINSETTIA AVE APT 305 MONTREAL OB H4C 3R3 CA CLEARWATER FL 33767 J B BARNES LLC LEWINSKI, WOJCIECH MOSSER, RICHARD S 155 SANGRA CT # 7 LEWINSKI, HANNA 326 WESTEIGHTS DR STREAMWOOD IL 60107 661 POINSETTIA AVE APT 306 KITCHENER ON N2N 1 K1 CA CLEARWATER FL 33767 MOUNTAIN TOP N C LLC PENSCO TRUST CO CDN SILLASEN, SEAJAYE PO BOX 4087 GEHRAND, GERALD L IRA 70000534 12313 W LOUISIANA AVE CLEARWATER FL 33758 560 MISSION ST ## 13 LAKEWOOD CO 80228 SAN FRANCISCO CA 94105 NICHOLAS, JERRY 145 ISABELLA ST PARRY SOUND ONT P2A 1 N3 CA NORTH CLEARWATER BEACH DEVELOPMENT PO BOX 4189 CLEARWATER FL 33758 PENTHOUSE SHORES ASSN INC 661 POINSETTIA AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 PETER PAN DEV 610 MANDALAY NE CLEARWATER FL 33767 NORTH CLEARWATER BEACH DEV LLC PETER PAN DEVELOPMENTS LLC PO BOX 4189 5210 WEBB RD CLEARWATER FL 33758 TAMPA FL 33615 NYLANDER, MAGNUS NYLANDER, MARINA AKERBARSTIGEN 28 STOCKHOLM SE PALMA, GEORGE 1200 WYNCHGATE ST OAKVILLE ON L6L 21_4 CA PANGRITZ, GABRIELLA M 10306 ANTILLES DR LARGO FL 33774 PASQUALE, JACK R THE PASQUALE, PATRICIA A THE 1433 NORMAN DR DARIEN IL 60561 PENNOCK, ROBERT M II VAN ASDALE, MELODIE A 665 BAY ESPLANADE APT 3 CLEARWATER FL 33767 REEVES, RONALD A REEVES, BARBARA J 3912 E HILLS DR SAINT JOSEPH MO 64503 RHOADS, JEFFREY L PO BOX 861 DUNEDIN FL 34697 SMITH, IRENE V 661 POINSETTIA AVE APT 106 CLEARWATER FL 33767 SNO -BIRD PROP INC 10 PRINCE ST CUMBERLAND CTR ME 04021 SOMERSET PLACE INC 610 MANDALAY AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 SPEAR, ROBERT E THE 102 CARRIAGE SQUARE CT HENDERSONVLLE NC 28791 THE SPERELAKIS, ANTHONY SPERELAKIS -BABB, CHRISTINE MAR 10130 SLEEPYRIDGE DR LOVELAND OH 45140 ROLLINSON, ANN C 1364 ELLINGTON RD SOUTH WINDSOR CT 06074 ROYAL NORTH BEACH LLC PO BOX 703 ODESSA FL 33556 ROZENITS, FRED ROZENITS, ANNA 31 ISLAND WAY APT 1002 CLEARWATER FL 33767 SPERELAKIS, SOPHIA ANN SPERELAKIS, THOMAS ANDREAS 6327 JAMISON WAY LIBERTY TOWNSHIP OH 45044 SUNSET COTTAGES LLC 610 MANDALAY AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 THOMPSON, MICHAEL S THOMPSON, MARIA 5 DRYLAND RD BOROUGH GREEN KENT TN15 9SG GB PENNOCK, ROBERT M II SEIFERT, MICHAEL E THURMOND, CAROL HESS LIVING VAN ASDALE, MELODIE A SEIFERT, NANCY S TRUST 665 BAY ESPLANADE APT 3 5825 PERSIMMON DR THURMOND, CAROL HESS THE CLEARWATER FL 33767 MADISON WI 53711 829 OLEANDER DR AIKEN SC 29801 VASIL, VALERIE 711 OSCEOLA RD BELLEAIR FL 33756 WAGNER, LARRY H THE 240 WINDWARD PSE # 1202 CLEARWATER FL 33767 WENGER, TERRY WENGER, CARLA 363 SOUTH 350 WEST VAL PARAISO IN 46385 WINCHESTER, GARY WINCHESTER, PAMELA 17111 HANNA RD LUTZ FL 33549 WITHAM, DARLENE 55 SOMERSET ST UNIT 1 CLEARWATER FL 33767 ZHANG, FUGUI WANG, XUAN 5581 HIPPOLYTE- LANCTOT ST MONTERAL QC H1 K 5G6 CA �+- i �..�.+ '°` � 1 �• � r �I ,,- �,� � x,11 I ; PoIERSEI��.. now �,, �► ,` `'f a .� • . 1 r Is P ` r Ah MEL fF Fb- a +r,a M • a n t• � iti'iJ t � i �r I r, kd t a 1 I 1 CL I a�. RCiAt_ i. � I r ON p 'PIP o � c ■■ ■ lb m ; Wk- Property Appraiser General Infc ation Page 1 of 3 Interactive Map of this Sales Back to Query New Tax Collector Home Question /Comment about this WM a� rcel Query Results Search Page page 05- 29 -15- 54756- 082 -0130 Portability Data Current as of Radius Improvement Value Calculator February 05, 2013 Print Search per F.S. 553.844 Ownership/Mailing Ownership[Mailing Address Site Address BAY ESPLANADE PROJECT LLC 0 BAY ESPLANADE 305 CAMBRIDGE ST STE 3 CLEARWATER 33767 - CAMBRIDGE MA 02141 -1207 Institutional: No Property Use: 1000 (Vacant Commercial Land - lot & acreage) Living Units: [click here to hide] 2012 Legal Description MANDALAY UNIT NO. 5 REPLAT BLK 82, LOT 13 AS DESC IN PL 20 PG 27 2013 Exemptions 8 File for Homestead Exemption 2012 Caps /Classified Agricultural Value Year Save -Our -Homes Cap Percentage: 0.00% Homestead: No Government: No [Non-Homestead 10% (Cap: Yes Classified A ricultural: No Institutional: No Historic: No 2012 Parcel Information 2012 Trim Notice Most Recent Conveyance ISales Comparison IlCensus Tract Evacuation Zone Plat Book/Page 17364/0027 1210326002 A 020/048 2012 Interim Value Information Year Save -Our- Just /Market Assessed Value/ Coun School Municipal Taxable Homes cap Value SOH Cap Taxable Value Value Taxable Value 2012 No $153,000 $153,000 $153,000 $153,000 $153,000 http : / /www.pcpao.org /general.php ?strap = 152905547560820130 2/5/2013 [click here to hide] Value History as Certified (yellow indicates correction on file) Year Save -Our- Just/Market Assessed Value/ County School Municipal Homes Cap Value SOH Cap Taxable Value Taxable Value Taxable Value 2012 No $153,000 $153,000 $153,000 N/A $153,000 2011 No $153,000 $153,000 $153,000 N/A $153,000 2010 No $171,360 $171,360 $171,360 $171,360 $171,360 2009 No $180,000 $180,000 $180,000 $180,000 $180,000 2008 No $425,600 $425,600 $425,600 $425,600 $425,600 2007 No $446,900 $446,900 $446,900 N/A $446,900 2006 No $482,700 $482,700 $482,700 N/A $482,700 http : / /www.pcpao.org /general.php ?strap = 152905547560820130 2/5/2013 Property Appraiser General Info -ition Page 2 of 3 2005 No $520,000 $520,000 $520,000 N/A $520,000 2004 No $465,000 $465,000 $465,000 N/A $465,000 2003 No $340,000 $340,000 $340,000 N/A $340,000 2002 No $328,000 $328,000 $328,000 N/A $328,000 2001 No $313,700 $313,700 $313,700 N/A $313,700 2000 No $240,900 $240,900 $240,900 N/A $240,900 1999 No $221,300 $221,300 $221,300 N/A $221,300 1998 No $212,500 $212,500 $212,500 N/A $212,500 1997 No $212,500 $212,500 $212,500 N/A $212,500 1996 No $241,600 $241,600 $241,600 N/A $241,600 2012 Tax Information Ranked Sales (what are Raked sales ?) See all Click Here for 2012 Tax Bill Tax District: CW transactions 2012 Final Millage Rate 21.4794 Sale Date Book/Page Price O/U V/I 2012 Est Taxes w/o Cap or $3,286.35 19 Sep 17364/ i0 $475,000 M V ' Exemptions 2011 0027 A significant change in taxable value may occur 31 Dec 09567/ ■ $250,000 Q I when sold due to changes in the market or the 1996 1830 removal of exemptions. Click here for more Dec 1984 05904/ $280,000 Q information. 1642 0 1978 04668/ $168,000 Q 1103 0 1972 03702/ $16,500 Q 0069 m 17 Apr 15669/ $5,150000 U V ' 2006 0998 9 Seawall: No Land Use Vacant Commercial (10) 2012 Land Information Frontage: None Land Unit Units Total Size Value Adiustments 60x120 25.00 7200.0000 1.0000 View: Adiusted Method Value $180,000 SF [click here to hide] 2012 Extra Features Description Value/Unit Units Total NewValue Depreciated Value Year No Extra Features on Record I [click here to hide] Permit Data I Permit information is received from the County and Cities. This data may be incomplete and may exclude permits that do not result in field reviews (for example for water heater replacement permits). Any questions regarding permits should be directed to the permitting office in which the structure is located. Permit Number ]I Description I Issue Date 11 Estimated Value j 200504315 IF PARTIAL DEMO IF 06 May 2005 11 $1,000 http : / /www.pcpao.org /general.php ?strap = 152905547560820130 2/5/2013 Property Appraiser General Infc lion adius feet): erials: 2011 Color ransparency: 0.5 372 Page 3 of 3 If you do not see map, the SVG viewer has not been installed. Click here for information and installation. How to copy and paste a static map using Internet Explorer: Right -click on the map; Select "Copy SVG "; Open a Word "Paste Special" from Edit menu on toolbar; Select Bitmap, then OK How to copy and paste a static map using Mozilla Firefox: Right -click on the map; Select "This Frame "; Select "Open F: Window": Print from the new window. Click here for Interactive Map Interactive Map of this Sales Back to Query New Tax Collector Home Ouestion /Comment about this parcel uery Results Search Page page http : / /www.pcpao.org /general.php ?strap = 152905547560820130 2/5/2013 Property Appraiser General Infe 'ition Page 1 of 3 Interactive Map of this Sales Back to Quejy New Tax Collector Home Question /Comment about this WM ap rcel Que Results Search Pap-e page Portability Calculator 05- 29 -15- 54756- 082 -0110 Data Current as of February 05, 2013 Print Radius Improvement Value Search per F.S. 553.844 Ownership/Mailing Ownership/Mailing Address Site Address BAY ESPLANADE PROJECT LLC 0 BAY ESPLANADE 305 CAMBRIDGE ST STE 3 CLEARWATER 33767 - CAMBRIDGE MA 02141 -1207 Institutional: No Property Use: 1000 (Vacant Commercial Land - lot & acreage) Living Units: [click here to hide] 2012 Legal Description MANDALAY UNIT NO. 5 REPLAT BLK 82, LOT 11 AS DESC IN PL 20 PG 27 2013 Exemptions ® File for Homestead Exemption 2012 Caps /Classified Agricultural Value 2012 Interim Value Information Save - Our -Homes Cap Percentage: 0.00% Homestead: No IF Government: No Non - Homestead 10% Cap: Yes Classified I Agricultural: No Institutional: No Historic: No Counjy I 2012 Parcel Information 2012 Trim Notice Most Recent Conveyance ISales Comparison IlCensus Tract Evacuation Zone Plat Book/Page 17364/0027 1210326002 A 020/048 http : / /www.pcpao.org /general.php ?strap= 152905547560820110 2/5/2013 2012 Interim Value Information Year Save - Our - Just/Market Assessed Value/ Counjy School Taxable Municipal Homes cap Value SOH Cap Taxable Value Value Taxable Value 2012 No $154,556 $154,556 $154,556 $154,556 $154,556 [click here to hide] Value History as Certified (yellow indicates correction on file) Year Save -Our- Just/Market Assessed Value/ Countv School Municipal Homes Cap Value SOH Cap Taxable Value Taxable Value Taxable Value 2012 No $154,556 $154,556 $154,556 N/A $154,556 2011 No $154,556 $154,556 $154,556 N/A $154,556 2010 No $173,102 $173,102 $173,102 $173,102 $173,102 2009 No $181,825 $181,825 $181,825 $181,825 $181,825 2008 No $373,500 $373,500 $373,500 $373,500 $373,500 2007 No $447,300 $447,300 $447,300 N/A $447,300 2006 No $463,700 $463,700 $463,700 N/A $463,700 http : / /www.pcpao.org /general.php ?strap= 152905547560820110 2/5/2013 Property Appraiser General Info ation Page 2 of 3 2005 No $334,600 $334,600 $334,600 N/A $334,600 2004 No $260,000 $260,000 $260,000 N/A $260,000 2003 No $237,000 $237,000 $237,000 N/A $237,000 2002 No $230,000 $230,000 $230,000 N/A $230,000 2001 No $232,000 $232,000 $232,000 N/A $232,000 2000 No $205,600 $205,600 $205,600 N/A $205,600 1999 No $187,100 $187,100 $187,100 N/A $187,100 1998 No $178,500 $178,500 $178,500 N/A $178,500 1997 No $178,500 $178,500 $178,500 N/A $178,500 1996 No $153,000 $153,000 $153,000 N/A $153,000 2012 Tax Information Ranked Sales (what are Raked sales?) See all Click Here for 2012 Tax Bill Tax District: CW transactions 2012 Final Millage Rate 21.4794 Sale Date Book/Page Price Q/U V/I 2012 Est Taxes w/o Cap or $3319.77 19 Sep 17364/ $475,000 M V Exemptions , 2011 0027 A significant change in taxable value may occur Dec 1986 06397/ $129,000 Q when sold due to changes in the market or the 0871 0 removal of exemptions. Click here for more 1978 04690/ $85,000 Q information. 2069 ® ' 17 Apr 15669/ $5,150,000 U V 2006 0998 01 Oct 13859/ $425000 U I ' 2004 2285 ® Seawall: No Land Use Vacant Commercial (10) 2012 Land Information Frontage: None Land Unit Units Total Size Value Adiustments 60x 123 25.00 7273.1900 1.0000 View: Adiusted Method Value $181,830 SF [click here to hide] 2012 Extra Features Description Value/Unit Units Total NewValue Depreciated Value Year No Extra Features on Record I [click here to hide] Permit Data I Permit information is received from the County and Cities. This data may be incomplete and may exclude permits that do not result in field reviews (for example for water heater replacement permits). Any questions regarding permits should be directed to the permitting office in which the structure is located. Permit Number Description I Issue Date IL Estimated Value 200504318 PARTIAL DEMO 12 May 2005 $1,000 200005014 �- ROOF 19 Jun 2000 11 $6,990 http : / /www.pepao.org /general.php ?strap = 152905547560820110 2/5/2013 Property Appraiser General Infe -ition adius feet): Aerials: 2011 Color ransparency: 0.5 387 Page 3 of 3 If you do not see map, the SVG viewer has not been installed. Click here for information and installation. How to copy and paste a static map using Internet Explorer: Right -click on the map; Select "Copy SVG "; Open a Word "Paste Special" from Edit menu on toolbar; Select Bitmap, then OK How to copy and paste a static map using Mozilla Firefox: Right -click on the map; Select "This Frame "; Select "Open F. Window "; Print from the new window. Interactive Map of this Sales Back to Query New Tax Collector Home Question /Comment about this ap rcel Query Results Search Page Me- http : / /www.pcpao.org /general.php ?strap= 152905547560820110 2/5/2013 Property Appraiser General Info ation Page 1 of 3 Interactive Map of this Sales Back to Quejy New Tax Collector Home Question /Comment about this WM p a rcel ue Results Search Page a e Portability Calculator 05- 29 -15- 54756- 082 -0010 Data Current as of February 05, 2013 Print Radius Improvement Value Search per F.S. 553.844 Ownership/Mailing Ownership/Mailing Address Site Address BAY ESPLANADE PROJECT LLC Save -Our -Homes Cap Percentage: 0.00% C/O DE NUNZIO, DUSTIN 0 POINSETTIA AVE 305 CAMBRIDGE ST STE 3 CLEARWATER 33767 - CAMBRIDGE MA 02141 -1207 Prope . Use: 1000 (Vacant Commercial Land - lot & acreage) Living Units: [click here to hide] 2012 Legal Description MANDALAY UNIT NO. 5 REPLAT BLK 82, LOT 1 AS DESC. IN PL 20 PG 27 2013 Exemptions 8 File for Homestead Exemption 2012 Caps /Classified Agricultural Value Year Save -Our -Homes Cap Percentage: 0.00% Homestead: No Government: No Non - Homestead 10% Cap: Yes Classified Agricultural: No Institutional: N=oj Historic: No I 2012 Parcel Information 2012 Trim Notice Most Recent Conveyance ISales Comparison I lCensus Tract lEvacuation Zone Plat Book/Page 17364/0027 1210326002 A 020/048 2012 Interim Value Information Year Save -Our- Just /Market Assessed Value/ County School Municipal Taxable Homes cap Value SOH Cap Taxable Value Taxable Value Value 2012 No $218,025 $218,025 $218,025 $218,025 $218,025 http : / /www.pepao.org /oeneral.php ?strap= 152905547560820010 2/5/2013 [click here to hide] Value History as Certified (yellow indicates correction on file) Year Save -Our- Just/Market Assessed Value/ Countv School Municipal Homes Cap Value SOH Cap Taxable Value Taxable Value Taxable Value 2012 No $218,025 $218,025 $218,025 N/A $218,025 2011 No $218,025 $218,025 $218,025 N/A $218,025 2010 No $244,188 $244,188 $244,188 $244,188 $244,188 2009 No $256,500 $256,500 $256,500 $256,500 $256,500 2008 No $601,200 $601,200 $601,200 $601,200 $601,200 2007 No $613,200 $613,200 $613,200 N/A $613,200 2006 No $663,100 $663,100 $663,100 N/A $663,100 http : / /www.pepao.org /oeneral.php ?strap= 152905547560820010 2/5/2013 Property Appraiser General Infc, ition Page 2 of 3 2005 No $487,800 $487,800 $487,800 N/A $487,800 2004 No $319,700 $319,700 $319,700 N/A $319,700 2003 Yes $296,700 $225,300 $200,300 N/A $200,300 2002 Yes $240,500 $196,500 $171,500 N/A $171,500 2001 Yes $251,200 $214,300 $189,300 N/A $189,300 2000 Yes $195,200 $175,000 $150,000 N/A $150,000 1999 Yes $160,300 $152,400 $127,400 N/A $127,400 1 998 Yes $134,700 $1 34,700 $109,700 N/A $109,700 1997 Yes $134,700 $134,700 $109,700 N/A $109,700 1996 Yes $134,700 $134,700 $109,700 N/A $109,700 2012 Tax Information Ranked Sales (what are Ranked sales ?) See all Click Here for 2012 Tax Bill Tax District: CW transactions 2012 Final Millage Rate 21.4794 Sale Date Book/Page Price Q/U V/I 2012 Est Taxes w/o Cap or $4683.05 19 Sep 17364/ $475,000 M V Exemptions , 2011 0027 A significant change in taxable value may occur 1977 04593/ $82,000 Q when sold due to changes in the market or the 0593 0 removal of exemptions. Click here for more 1974 04150/ $75,000 Q information. 1896 & 1971 $26,300 Q 0917 0 17 Apr 15669/ $5,150,000 U V 2006 0998 01 Oct 13859/ $550 000 U I ' 2004 2259 ® Seawall: No Land Use Vacant Commercial (10) 2012 Land Information Frontage: None Land Unit Units Total Size Value Adiustments 83x123 25.00 10260.0000 1.0000 View: Adiusted Method Value $256,500 SF [click here to hide] 2012 Extra Features Description Value/Unit Units Total NewValue Depreciated Value Year No Extra Features on Record I [click here to hide] Permit Data I Permit information is received from the County and Cities. This data may be incomplete and may exclude permits that do not result in field reviews (for example for water heater replacement permits). Any questions regarding permits should be directed to the permitting office in which the structure is located. Permit Number Description Issue Date 11 Estimated Value 200504322 DEMOLITION 18 Aug 2005 IF $0 200504314 PARTIAL DEMO 03 Ma 2005 $1,000 http : / /www.pepao.org /general.php ?strap =l 52905547560820010 2/5/2013 Property Appraiser General Ink ation Page 3 of 3 fZadius ;feet): Aerials: 2011 Color Transparency: 0.5 384 f you do not see map, the SVG viewer has not been installed. Click here for information and installation. How to copy and paste a static map using Internet Explorer: Right -click on the map; Select "Copy SVG "; Open a Word 'Paste Special" from Edit menu on toolbar; Select Bitmap, then OK How to copy and paste a static map using Mozilla Firefox: Right -click on the map; Select "This Frame "; Select "Open F Window "; Print from the new window. 71 o a A 6t.Gax'"" 1. h ! v4 bg a V �• ap rcel uery Results Search Pace http : / /www.pcpao.ora /general.php ?strap = 152905547560820010 2/5/2013 Interactive Map of this Sales Back to Query New i Question/Comment about this ap rcel uery Results Search Pace Me- Click here for Interactive�`� A Map �.. y •Hrot� ♦u..rskTT� b� F . , %�, d° 'et. �r n + �,� +:�. http : / /www.pcpao.ora /general.php ?strap = 152905547560820010 2/5/2013 Interactive Map of this Sales Back to Query New Tax Collector Home Question/Comment about this ap rcel uery Results Search Pace Me- http : / /www.pcpao.ora /general.php ?strap = 152905547560820010 2/5/2013 Property Appraiser General Info vion Page 1 of 3 Interactive Map of this Sales Back to Query New Tax Collector Home Question /Comment about this WM ap reel Query Results Search Page page 05- 29 -15- 54756- 082 -0120 Portability Data Current as of Radius Improvement Value Calculator February 05, 2013 Print Search per F.S. 553.844 Ownership/Mailing Ownership[Mailing Address Site Address BAY ESPLANADE PROJECT LLC 0 BAY ESPLANADE 305 CAMBRIDGE ST STE 3 CLEARWATER 33767 - CAMBRIDGE MA 02141 -1207 Institutional: No PropeM Use: 1000 (Vacant Commercial Land - lot & acreage) Living Units: [click here to hide] 2012 Legal Description MANDALAY UNIT NO. 5 REPLAT BLK 82, LOT 12 AS DESC IN PL 20 PG 27 2013 Exemptions 9 File for Homestead Exemption 2012 Caps /Classified Agricultural Value Year Save - Our -Homes Cap Percentage: 0.00% Homestead: No j Government: No Non - Homestead 10% Cap: Yes 1 Classified Agri cultural: No Institutional: No j Historic: No j I 2012 Parcel Information 2012 Trim Notice Most Recent Conveyance ISales Com arison Census Tract Evacuation Zone Plat Book/Page 17364/0027 1210326002 A 020/048 2012 Interim Value Information Year Save -Our- Just/Market Assessed Value/ County School Municipal Homes cap Value SOH Cap Taxable Value Taxable Value Taxable Value 2012 No $142,928 $142,928 $142,928 $142,928 $142,928 http : / /www.pcpao.org /general.php ?strap= 152905547560820120 2/5/201.3 [click here to hide] Value History as Certified (yellow indicates correction on file) Year Save -Our- Just/Market Assessed Value/ County School Municipal Homes Cap Value SOH Cap Taxable Value Taxable Value Taxable Value 2012 No $142,928 $142,928 $142,928 N/A $142,928 2011 No $142,928 $142,928 $142,928 N/A $142,928 2010 No $160,079 $160,079 $160,079 $160,079 $160,079 2009 No $168,150 $168,150 $168,150 $168,150 $168,150 2008 No $398,700 $398,700 $398,700 $398,700 $398,700 2007 No $420,100 $420,100 $420,100 N/A $420,100 2006 No $453,700 $453,700 $453,700 N/A $453,700 http : / /www.pcpao.org /general.php ?strap= 152905547560820120 2/5/201.3 Property Appraiser General Infr ation Page 2 of 3 2005 No $358,100 $358,100 $358,100 N/A $358,100 2004 No $240,100 $240,100 $240,100 N/A $240,100 2003 No $215,900 $215,900 $215,900 N/A $215,900 2002 No $187,800 $187,800 $187,800 N/A $187,800 2001 No $197,200 $197,200 $197,200 N/A $197,200 2000 No $157,800 $157,800 $157,800 N/A $157,800 1999 No $131,200 $131,200 $131,200 N/A $131,200 1998 No $131,400 $131,400 $131,400 N/A $131,400 1997 No $123,900 $123,900 $123,900 N/A $123,900 1996 No $120,900 $120,900 $120,900 N/A $120,900 2012 Tax Information Ranked Sales Mbat are Ranked sales?) See all Click Here for 2012 Tax Bill Tax District: CW transactions 2012 Final Millage Rate 21.4794 Sale Date Book/Page Price Q/U V/I 2012 Est Taxes w/o Cap or $3070.01 19 Sep 17364/ ® $475 000 M V ' Exemptions , 2011 0027 A significant change in taxable value may occur Jul 1986 06270/ $90,000 Q when sold due to changes in the market or the 1415 0 removal of exemptions. Click here for more 17 Apr 15669/ $5,150,000 U V information. 2006 0998 0 01 Oct 13859/ $450 000 ' U I 2004 2318 ® 2012 Land Information Seawall: No Frontage: None View: Land Unit Total Adiusted Method Land Use Size Value Units Adiustments Value Vacant Commercial 57x118 25.00 6726.0000 1.0000 $168,150 SF (10) [click here to hide] 2012 Extra Features Description Value/Unit Units Total NewValue Depreciated Value Year No Extra Features on Record I [click here to hide] Permit Data I Permit information is received from the County and Cities. This data may be incomplete and may exclude permits that do not result in field reviews (for example for water heater replacement permits). Any questions regarding permits should be directed to the permitting office in which the structure is located. Permit Number ]F-Description IF Issue Date 200504324 DEMOLITION 11 18 Aug 2005 Radius (feet): Aerials: 2011 Color 390 Estimated Value : 0.5 you do not see map, the SVG viewer has not been installed. Click here for information and installation. ow to copy and paste a static map using Internet Explorer: Right -click on the map; Select "Copy SVG "; Open a Word http : / /www.pepao.org /general.php ?strap= 152905547560820120 2/5/2013 Property Appraiser General Info ation Page 3 of 3 'aste Special" from Edit menu on toolbar; Select Bitmap, then OK ow to copy and paste a static map using WAIN Firefox: Right -click on the map; Select "This Frame "; Select "Open F 'indow "; Print from the new window. Click here for Interactive Map e+ r Interactive Map of this Sales Back to Query New Tax Collector Home Question /Comment about this ap rcel Query Results Search Page Me http : / /www.pcpao.org /general.php ?strap= 152905547560820120 2/5/2013 Property Appraiser General Infr -ation Page 1 of 3 Interactive Map of this Sales Back to Quejy New Tax Collector Home Question /Comment about this WM ap rcel Quejy Results Search Pate pace 05- 29 -15- 54756- 082 -0020 Portability Data Current as of Radius Improvement Value Calculator February 05, 2013 Print Search per F.S. 553.844 Ownership/Mailing Ownership/Mailing Address Site Address BAY ESPLANADE PROJECT LLC 0 POINSETTIA AVE 305 CAMBRIDGE ST STE 3 CLEARWATER 33767 - CAMBRIDGE MA 02141 -1207 Institutional: No Prope, Use: 1000 (Vacant Commercial Land - lot & acreage) Living Units: [click here to hide] 2012 Legal Description MANDALAY UNIT NO. 5 REPLAT BLK 82, LOT 2 AS DESC. IN PL 20 PG 27 2013 Exemptions 19 File for Homestead Exemption 2012 Caps /Classified Agricultural Value Year Save -Our -Homes Ca Percentage: 0.00% Homestead: No Government: No Non - Homestead 10% Cap: Yes Classified Agricultural: No Institutional: No Historic: No I 2012 Parcel Information 2012 Trim Notice Most Recent Conveyance ISales ComparisonlICensus Tract lEvacuation Zone Plat Boo age 17364/0027 1210326002 A 020/048 2012 Interim Value Information Year Save -Our- Just/Market Assessed Value/ Coun School Municipal Homes cap Value SOH Cap Taxable Value Taxable Value Taxable Value 2012 No $181,475 $181,475 $181,475 $181,475 $181,475 http : / /www.pepao.org /general.php ?strap= 152905547560820020 2/5/2013 [click here to hide] Value History as Certified (yellow indicates correction on file) Year Save -Our- Just /Market Assessed Value/ County School Municipal Homes Cap Value SOH Cap Taxable Value Taxable Value Taxable Value 2012 No $181,475 $181,475 $181,475 N/A $181,475 2011 No $181,475 $181,475 $181,475 N/A $181,475 2010 No $203,252 $203,252 $203,252 $203,252 $203,252 2009 No $213,500 $213,500 $213,500 $213,500 $213,500 2008 No $502,600 $502,600 $502,600 $502,600 $502,600 2007 No $520,500 $520,500 $520,500 N/A $520,500 2006 No $562,500 $562,500 $562,500 N/A $562,500 http : / /www.pepao.org /general.php ?strap= 152905547560820020 2/5/2013 Property Appraiser General Inf- ration Page 2 of 3 2005 No $404,600 $404,600 $404,600 N/A $404,600 2004 No $267,900 $267,900 $267,900 N/A $267,900 2003 No $251,600 $251,600 $251,600 N/A $251,600 2002 No $214,800 $214,800 $214,800 N/A $214,800 2001 No $220,000 $220,000 $220,000 N/A $220,000 2000 No $170,800 $170,800 $170,800 N/A $170,800 1999 No $144,600 $144,600 $144,600 N/A $144,600 1998 No $144,900 $144,900 $144,900 N/A $144,900 1997 No $139,500 $139,500 $139,500 N/A $139,500 1996 No $137,100 $1 37,100 $1 37,100 N/A $137,100 2012 Tax Information Ranked Sales (what are Ranked sales?) See all Click Here for 2012 Tax Bill Tax District: CW transactions 2012 Final Millage Rate 21.4794 Sale Date Book/Page Price 0/U V/I 2012 Est Taxes w/o Cap or $3,897.97 19 Sep 17364/ ® $475,000 M V ' Exemptions 2011 0027 A significant change in taxable value may occur 17 Apr 15669/ $5,150,000 U V when sold due to changes in the market or the 2006 0998 removal of exemptions. Click here for more 01 Oct 13859/ $500,000 U I information. 2004 2282 18 Jan 11192/ $170,000 U I 2001 2555 26 Aug 08766/ $110000 U I ' 1994 1446 ® Seawall: No Land Use Vacant Commercial (10) 2012 Land Information Frontage: None Land Unit Units Total Size Value Adiustments 70x122 25.00 8540.0000 1.0000 View: Adiusted Method Value $213,500 SF [click here to hide] 2012 Extra Features Description Value/Unit Units Total NewValue Depreciated Value Year No Extra Features on Record I [click here to hide] Permit Data I Permit information is received from the County and Cities. This data may be incomplete and may exclude permits that do not result in field reviews (for example for water heater replacement permits). Any questions regarding permits should be directed to the permitting office in which the structure is located. Permit Number Description 11 Issue Date IL Estimated Value 200504313 PARTIAL DEMO 03 May 2005 IF $0 200504316 PARTIAL DEMO 03 May 2005 $0 200103315 HEAT /AIR IF 16 Apr 2001 11 $4,900 http : / /www.pepao.org /general.pbp ?strap= 152905547560820020 2/5/2013 Property Appraiser General Inf ration Page 3 of 3 Zadius .feet): Aerials: 2011 Color Transparency: 0.5 366 f you do not see map, the SVG viewer has not been installed. Click here for information and installation. Sow to copy and paste a static map using Internet Explorer: Right -click on the map; Select "Copy SVG "; Open a Word 'Paste Special" from Edit menu on toolbar; Select Bitmap, then OK 'rlow to copy and paste a static map using Mozilla Firefox: Right -click on the map; Select "This Frame'; Select "Open F Window "; Print from the new window. 41—M "'o sum Click here for 1VjLUV i � t i. T x 91 k� 4 ` S, Interactive Map of this Sales Back to Query New Tax Collector Home Question /Comment about this ap rcel ue Results Search Page gage http : / /www.pcpao.org /general.php ?strap= 152905547560820020 2/5/2013 �4''4Y CITY OF CLEARWATER �V.,I; - r' PLi.N.Niv; &. DFymo muNT DEPARTMENT Pmi, Oma Box 4748, C LARAf'aYR, IinRazA 337584'48 ZI 'M , MUNICrPAL Saivi<as Bminum;, 100 Sarni W rus AviiN a:, < umwAr4R, ftoiu A 31756 ;g7FyHy�D` Tm.rrnnnr (727) 562 -4567 F.x (727) 5624865 February 6, 2013 RANDY AUSTIN VIA FAX: 31622 US19N PALM HARBOR, FL 34684 RE: FLS2013 -02006 -- 650 BAY ESPLANADE -- Letter of Completeness Dear RANDY AUSTIN: The Planning and Development staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLS2013- 02006. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is complete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on March 7, 2013, in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in downtown Clearwater. You will be contacted by the Planning Department's Administrative Analyst within one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. Additional comments may be generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 562 - 4567x2502 or Kevin.Nurnberger@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, Kevin Nurnberger Planner III 2/6/2013 "EgnALEMPunarErr Ahn AFnRmKnve. An ian EmpmwR" I~ EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL 1 LOT 1, BLOCK 82, UNIT NO. 5, MANDALAY REPLAT, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 20, PAGE 27, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA AND PLAT BOOK 20, PAGE 48, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 2 LOT 2, BLOCK 82, MANDALAY UNIT #5, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 20, PAGE 27, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, LOT 2, FURTHER DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 82, OF UNIT 5, MANDALAY, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 20, PAGE 48, PINELLAS COUNTY RECORDS, RUN SOUTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF CHEROKEE AVENUE, 248 FEET FOR POB, THENCE RUN N88'04'43 "E, 121 FEET; THENCE RUN S01'37'47 "E, 70 FEET; THENCE RUN S88 *06'02 "W, 123 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF CHEROKEE AVENUE; THENCE RUN NORTH 70 FEET TO POB. (CHEROKEE AVENUE IS NOW KNOWN AS POINSETTIA AVENUE) PARCEL 3 LOT 11, BLOCK 82, MANDALAY UNIT NO. 5, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 20, PAGE 27, AND PLAT BOOK 20, PAGE 48, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 4 LOT 12, BLOCK 82, MANDALAY UNIT NO. 5, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 20,- PAGE 27, AND PLAT BOOK 20, PAGE 48, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 5 LOT 13, BLOCK 82, MANDALAY UNIT NO. 5, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 20, PAGE 27, AND PLAT BOOK 20, PAGE 48, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. 0 1 2013 FEB I �� i GULF COAST TESTING LABORATORY, INC. 5745 PARK BOULEVARD PINELLAS PARK, FL 33781 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS ENGINEERING COUNCIL CERTIFIED CERTIFIACTE ofAUTHORIZATION # 00002370 PHONE: (727) 544 -4080 FAX.- (727) 544 -7532 INFILTRATION RATE OF SOILS IN FIELD USINIS DOUBLE RING INFILTROMETER - CLIENT: The DeNunzio Group LAB NO: 19476 PROJECT: 650 and 669 Bay Esplanade, Clearwater, Florida DATE REPORTED: 1/15/13 DATE TESTED: 1/15/13 LOCATION OF TEST: 35' E of Poinsettia Ave x 63' No f Bay Esplanade (See Site Plan) DRI # 1 DEPTH TO EXISTING WATER TABLE: 41211 Below the Existing Ground Surface ESTIMATED SEASONAL HIGH WATER LEVEL: 2'0" Below the Existing Ground Surface REMARKS: Parcel 1, Lot 1 (Tidal variations will Influence the Water Table in this Site) WATER TEMP: 76 deg. F WATER pH: •= INNER RING READINGS SOIL PROFILE 24.0 23.0 22.0 21.0 20.0 19.0 18.0 17.0 16.0 15.0 INCH .5 1 2 3 4 5 6 PER Elapsed Time (Hours) HOUR INFILTRATION RATE = 16.9 INCHES / HR. Respectfully Submitted, 1 Ground level R. Gunasekaran, P. E. Fla. License No. 20402 cc: The DeNunzio Group Mr. Joe Burdette File 4 1 1 TEST Depth ��.� 1'-O" j halnw Fvictino (:rarta � T Test Elevation Depth s ! I __ ........................ ...... ...... _.........__..___._ _ ..... .......... __.__ ._._.._.._._........_..._.... .......... i .......... —. _ .....' :N Light Gray SAND w/ Shell & F __._...._............_........._... ..._._........_.._?........__.. __.._ ._..... _ i I 3' 4" 2.5Y 8/1 L Fragments & Dark Gray Silt 5' 2" Lenses 2.5Y 7/1 Very Dk. Brown Fiberous Root & Dk. 51101, Gray Silt IOYR 2/2 IOYR 4/1 _.........._....._........... .__.._...._..... ..... _..___...! ........ __ ................. — — .......... : _...... _......... 'T _ ........... ..... i_ ........... _ i........_.........;- .....................................,.. ........_..._...4- .........._._ _ ........ _ ...... _.... • O _ .............. ........... .._ ........... __ .................. _ _ ......... _ _ .......... __ ............... ...... _ ...... _.._ ------ ......... .......... N ! .. _ >_.� ...... i • J ,R ._..........._... 1....._._ ... _ .....__ ......................... ....._.................._...... _ ...._._...._..._ .......... A . ..... ..... T ! I INCH .5 1 2 3 4 5 6 PER Elapsed Time (Hours) HOUR INFILTRATION RATE = 16.9 INCHES / HR. Respectfully Submitted, 1 Ground level R. Gunasekaran, P. E. Fla. License No. 20402 cc: The DeNunzio Group Mr. Joe Burdette File 4 1 1 TEST Depth ��.� 1'-O" j halnw Fvictino (:rarta � T Test Elevation Depth CLASSIFICATION in feet. (EXISTING SURFACE APPROX. ELEV.) Very Dk. Grayish Brown SAND w/ Roots, 0' 6" Shell & Few Concrete Pieces 10YR 3/2 Light Gray SAND w/ Shell & Shell Fragments (Concrete Pieces 2' 5" in Upper 1' ) 2.5Y 7/1 White SAND w/ Shell Fragments 3' 4" 2.5Y 8/1 Light Gray SAND w/ Shell Fragments & Dark Gray Silt 5' 2" Lenses 2.5Y 7/1 Very Dk. Brown Fiberous Root & Dk. 51101, Gray Silt IOYR 2/2 IOYR 4/1 Gray Silty SAND w/ Shell Frag. 6' 4" & Fiberous Roots IOYR 511 Hole Terminated at 76" 12" Inner I �I /8" ring E 6 "water 6 "ring set 24' 24" Outer ring J This report is the property of the Client listed and cannot be copied or reproduced without', c GULF COAST TESTING LABORATORY, INC. 5745 PARK BOULEVARD PINELLAS PARK, FL 33781 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS ENGINEERING COUNCIL CERTIFIED CERTIFIACTE ofAUTHORIZATION # 00002370 PHONE: (727) 544 -4080 FAX.- (727) 544 -7532 INFILTRATION RATE OF IS©ILIS IN FIELD USM DOUBLE RING INFIL TROMETER CLIENT: The DeNunzio Group LAB NO: 19476 PROJECT: 650 and 669 Bay Esplanade, Clearwater, Florida DATE REPORTED: 1/16/13 DATE TESTED: 1/16/13 LOCATION OF TEST: 51' E of Bay Esplanade x 21' N of South Property Line (See Site Plan) DRI # 2 DEPTH TO EXISTING WATER TABLE: 4' 1" Below the Existing Ground Surface ESTIMATED SEASONAL HIGH WATER LEVEL: 2' 0" Below the Existing Ground Surface REMARKS: Parcel 1, Lot 8 (Tidal Variations will influence the Water Table in this Site) WATER TEMP: 76 deg. F AIR TEMP: 79 deg. F WATER pH: 24.0 23.0 22.0 21.0 20.0 19.0 18.0 17.0 16.0 15.0 •= INNER RING READINGS SOIL PROFILE INCH .5 1 2 3 4 5 6 PER Elapsed Time (Hours) HOUR INFILTRATION RATE = 18.8 INCHES/HR. Respectfully Submitted, 1 Ground level R. Gunasekaran, P. E. Fla. License No. 20402 cc: The DeNunzio Group Mr. Joe Burdette File 4 1 1 TEST Depth below Extstin de Test Elevation Depth CLASSIFICATION In feet. (EXISTING SURFACE APPROX. ELEV.) 1 Brown sl Clayey Sand & Clay 1'2" ( Nodules & Shell Fragments l OYR 5/3 Light Gray SAND w/ Shell Fragments IOYR 7/1 Light Gray SAND w/ Shell & 2' 4" Shell Fragments IOYR 7/2 Very Pale Brown SAND w/ Shell 3' 3" & Shell Fragments IOYR 8/2 Very Pale Brown SAND & Shell 4' 1" IOYR 8/2 6'2" Gray Sand & Shell & Shell fragments IOYR 5/1 24" Outer ring This report is the property of the Client listed and cannot be copied or reproduced without FEB 01 2013 pn pe Is CTL 'VVE- -� i PLril��i�i:l rJ rte.': ii -i ^ ^ gab. rza Locatio- iji FEB 01 2013 CITY OF C L E A R W A T E R 016-426523470 Planning and Development Department POST OFFICE Box 4748 % & P 0 1 D62) CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 02/21/2013 wtw From 33634 US POSTAGE "Oe. NYLANDER MAGN'CJ NYLANDERYARINA AKERBAVk j�1GEN'2' STOCHS WSO 11341E 076 Dc 1 7 6 UNDELIV.-PRABLE AS ADDRESSED UNABLE TO F tit? WAR-00 8C: 3375*8474848 110i l- 0.8860 -22 -CAS 3.31 .58- -x47 4 8 C ITY 0F. C L E A R W A T E R-- PLANNING & DEvr.LOPbIIiN'r DEPARTMENT r POST OlTKT Box 4748, C.LEARW.KrER, FLORIDA 3375 "148 MuN IPAL SERVICE' 13TUDING. .1VO SOc-ni M7'R7'LE ANT IN tL, CLEARNNA7ER, FLoRTDA 33 56 ATER, r�, TEI.F.PHONE ({27) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4365 . February 15, 2013 RE: NOTICE OF FILING AN APPLICATION FOR FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AT 650 BAY ESPLANADE (FLS2013- 02006); OWNED BY: BAY ESPLANADE PROJECT LLC To Surrounding Property Owners: As a property owner within 500 feet of 650 BAY ESPLANADE, the City of Clearwater Planning and Development Department gives notice that an application has been submitted for Flexible Standard Development application to permit a 102 -room overnight accommodation use in the Tourist (T) District with a lot area of 41,232 square feet (0.95 acres), lot widths of 104 feet along Bay Esplanade (east); 289.98 feet along Bay Esplanade (south) and 182.06 feet along Poinsettia Avenue (west); a front (east) setback of 15 feet (to building); a front (south) setback of 15 feet (to building); a front (west) setback of 15 feet (to building) and 13 feet (to concrete pad); a side (north),setback of. 10 feet (to building); a building height of 65 feet (from Base Flood Elevation to flat roof); and 127 off- street parking spaces, pursuant to the Community Deveiopi4nt.Code Section 2- 802.M' and the Old Florida District standards in Beach by Design; and an increase in the maximum density through the allocation of 55 overnight accommodation units from the Hotel Density Reserve created pursuant to Beach by Design, as well as a reduction to the foundation landscaping along Bay Esplanade from five-feet to zero feet and an increase in the number of palm trees and accent trees in lieu of shade trees, as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program, pursuant to the Community Development Code Section 3- 1202.G. On March 7, 2013, the Development Review Committee (composed of the City's professional staff) will review and determine whether the application demonstates compliance with the City's Community Development Code. Following that review and determination, the Planning Director will issue a Development Order approving, approving with conditions, or denying the application. The earliest date that the City will make a decision on the application will be March 7, 2013. The City encourages you to participate in the review of this application. You may contact me at 562 - 1567x2502 or via email at Kevin. Nurnbergerumycle u nwater.com for further information, visit our office to review the files and /or submit written comments to be considered in the City review of the application. Please be advised that the applicant may submit additional or new information regarding this case which you may review during regular business hours. However, no further notice will be provided to you should the application be amended. An appeal of the decision of the Planning Director may be initiated by the applicant or property owners within the required notice area who present competent substantial evidence at, or prior to, the Development Review Committee meeting on March 7, 2013. An appeal must be filed, including an appeal fee, with the City Clerks Office within seven days of the issuance of the DevelopraTent Order. Thank you for your interest in the City of Clearwater's development review process. You may access the Planning and Development Department through the City's website: www.myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, 2/15/2013` .- "EQuIAL E iPI.oyNnwT AND OFFIMMATf` F, ACHON Bipi.ot Fr° Letter of Notification DeNunzio Hotel City of Clearwater, Florida January 2013 DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS Prepared for: Bay Esplanade Project L.L.C. 305 Cambridge Street, Suite 3 Cambridge, MA 02141 Ph. (617) 945 -2555 Prepared by: MEMO Landon, Moree & Associates, Inc Civil & Environmental Engineers Planners- Surveyors 31622 U.S. Highway 19 North Palm Harbor, Florida 34684 (727) 789 -5010 F.E.B. No. EB- 0004096 LMA JOB # 651 -01 � D � L� (5 L� IJ U i FEB 01 2013 P!„Yti�itit3 G L ":' _ili:N DEFT �.- iTY r` 07 U-1 A0,WATi'K t ► :iiii�llirf ► i i�j Pip [�eadbeiter, F- tic�en e NcY�60148" D 8.50 0.041 0.164 9.50 0.041 0.205 10.00 0.226 0.041 (ft) (Acres) (ac -ft) (RUNOFF FROM 1" RAINFALL) 4.50 0.041 0.000 WATER QUALITY 5.50 0.041 0.041 Drainage Calcs2 CONTRIBUTING AREA (1/2" RUNOFF) 0.95 VOLUME CONTRIBUTING OFF -SITE AREA (acre) 0.00 VOLUME (ac -ft) 0.040 6.50 0.041 0.082 7.50 0.041 0.123 WATER QUALITY ELEVATION (ft) 5.47 `� lD ! � 11 11 f� FEB 01 201311, , PL'NNIING L! DUVEI , -QMENI T DEFT DeNunzio Hotel Water Quality Volume /Stage Summary ELEV. AREA CUMUL. Stage vs. Storage 10.00 9.00 8.00 7.00 .00 - 4 Stage vs. Storage 5 5.00 f Treatment Volume 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 0.000 0.050 0.100 0.150 0.200 0.250 Storage (ac -ft) D 8.50 0.041 0.164 9.50 0.041 0.205 10.00 0.226 0.041 (ft) (Acres) (ac -ft) (RUNOFF FROM 1" RAINFALL) 4.50 0.041 0.000 WATER QUALITY 5.50 0.041 0.041 Drainage Calcs2 CONTRIBUTING AREA (1/2" RUNOFF) 0.95 VOLUME CONTRIBUTING OFF -SITE AREA (acre) 0.00 VOLUME (ac -ft) 0.040 6.50 0.041 0.082 7.50 0.041 0.123 WATER QUALITY ELEVATION (ft) 5.47 `� lD ! � 11 11 f� FEB 01 201311, , PL'NNIING L! DUVEI , -QMENI T DEFT Drainage Calcs2 CONTRIBUTING AREA (1/2" RUNOFF) 0.95 VOLUME CONTRIBUTING OFF -SITE AREA (acre) 0.00 VOLUME (ac -ft) 0.040 6.50 0.041 0.082 7.50 0.041 0.123 WATER QUALITY ELEVATION (ft) 5.47 `� lD ! � 11 11 f� FEB 01 201311, , PL'NNIING L! DUVEI , -QMENI T DEFT `� lD ! � 11 11 f� FEB 01 201311, , PL'NNIING L! DUVEI , -QMENI T DEFT FEB 01 200 Undrdrn ( I ; PLANNING i DeNunzio Hotel DRAWDOWN WORKSHEET FOR UNDERDRAIN WATER QUALITY ELEVATION = 5.47 FT NAVD BOTTOM OF POND ELEVATION = 4.50 FT NAVD WATER VOL AT QUALITY ELEV = 1725 CF UNDERDRAIN CENTERLINE ELEV = 3.75 FT NAVD TOTAL HEAD = 1.72 FT INCREMENTAL HEAD STEP = 0.1 FT # STEPS TO BOP = 9.7 STEPS # STEPS TO ZERO HEAD = 17 STEPS INCREMENTAL VOL = 178 CF FLOW LENGTH THROUGH FILTER MEDIA = 2 FT HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY(K) = 5 FT /HR UNIT PIPE LENGTH (L) = 1 FT ACTUAL PIPE LENGTH = 25.0 FEET ACTUAL DRAWDOWN TIME = 18.9 HOURS (Actual length * Actual time) _ (Unit length * Time for unit length) Note: For detention with effluent filtration system, detention volume must be available again within 24 hours. 1 E Elevallon k NAVD 2 H Total Head 3 h Incr. Head k 4 V Total Volume kA3 5 v Incr. Volume kA3 8 1 Filtration Length 7 I Hydraulic Gradient 8 A Area ttA2 0 0 Flow 10 G Aw. Flaw M 11 t Incr. Tinto 12 T Total Tkaa h 59470 1.720 1725.0 2.00 0.860 31.3 134.38 0.0 0.100 177.8 13047 1.4 5.370 1.620 15472 2.00 0,810 31.3 126.56 1.4 0.100 177.8 12266 1.4 5.270 1.520 1369.3 2.00 0.760 31.3 118.75 2.8 0.100 177.8 114.84 1.5 5.170 1420 1191.5 2.00 0.710 31.3 110.94 4.4 0.100 177.8 10203 1.7 5.070 1 320 1013.7 2.00 0.660 31.3 103.13 6.0 0.100 177.8 99.22 1.8 4.970 1.220 835.8 2.00 0.610 31.3 95.31 7.8 0.100 177.8 91.41 1.9 4.870 1.120 658.0 2.00 0.560 31.3 87.50 9.8 0.100 17798 83.59 21 49770 1020 480.2 2.00 0.510 31.3 79.69 11.9 0.100 1728 75.78 2.3 4.670 0.920 3023 2.00 0.460 31.3 71.88 142 0.100 177.8 67.97 2.6 4.570 0.820 124.5 2.00 0.410 31 31 64.06 16.9 0.070 124.5 61.33 2.0 4 500 0.750 0.0 2.00 0.375 3193 58.59 18.9 00001 0.0 1 58.59 0.0 4.500 0.750 0.0 2001 .0.375 31 3 58.59 18.9 0 000 0.0 58.59 0.0 4.500 0.750 0.0 2.00 0.375 31.3 58.59 18.9 0.000 090 58.59 0.0 4,5001 0.750 0.0 2.00 0.375 31.3 58.59 18.9 0.000 0.0 58.59 0.0 4.500 0.750 0.0 2.00 0.375 31.3 58.59 18.9 0.000 0 0 58.59 0.0 4.500 0.750 0.0 2.00 0.375 31.3 58.59 18.9 0.000 0.0 58.59 0.0 4.500 0.750 0.0 2001 .0.375 31.3 58.59 18.9 0.000 0.0 58.59 0.0 4.500 0.750 0.0 2.00 0.375 31.3 58.59 18.9 0.000 00 58.59 0.0 4.500 0.750 0.0 2.00 0.375 31.3 58.59 18.9 0.000 0.0 58.59 0.0 4.500 0.750 0.0 2900 0.375 3103 58.59 18.9 0.000 0.0 58.59 0.0 4.500 0.750 0.0 2.00 0.375 31.3 58.59 18.9 00001 1 0.0 1 58.59 0.0 4.500 07501 1 001 2.00 0.375 31.3 58.59 18.9 0.000 00 58.59 00 4.500 0 750 0.0 2.00 0.375 31.3 58.59 18.9 00001 0 0 58.59 0.0 4.500 0.750 0.0 2.00 0.375 31.3 58.59 18.9 FEB 01 200 Undrdrn ( I ; PLANNING i FEB 0 1 X013 r �.1 Drainage Calcs2 _._ _.; ^:T. �` � DeNunzio Hotel MODIFIED RATIONAL METHOD 50 year storm event zone 6 Overland Flow = 60 minutes Curb Flow = 0 minutes Time of Concentration = 60 minutes PREDEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS Historical Peak Disharge --- - - - - -> Q = C I * A WEIGHTED "C" FACTOR = 0.22 INTENSITY (in /hr) = 4.1 in /hr AREA (acres) = 0.95 acres 0.86 cfs PROPOSED CONDITIONS "C" factor Impervious = 0.63 acres * 0.95 = 0.599 Rock = 0.00 acres * 0.65 = 0.000 Pond = 0.04 acres ' 1.00 = 0.040 Open Space = 0.28 acres * 0.22 = 0.062 0.95 acres WEIGHTED "C" = 0.737 PEAK STORM RELEASE RAINFALL INTENSITY FLOW RUNOFF FLOW REQUIRED DURATION I Q =CIA VOLUME VOLUME STORAGE (min) (sec) (inlhr) (cfs) (cf) (cf) (cf) (ac ft) 60 3600 4.1 2.89 10406 3106 7299 1 0.168 < FEB 0 1 X013 r �.1 Drainage Calcs2 _._ _.; ^:T. �` � CONTRIBUTING AREA (acre) 0.95 0.00 DeNunzio Hotel 50 YR VOLUME PLUS (ac -ft) 0.207 ) Volume /Stage Summary 0.041 0.000 ELEV. AREA CUMUL. 6.50 0.041 0.082 7.50 0.041 VOLUME 8.50 0.041 (ft) (Acres) (ac -ft 0.205 10.00 0.041 0.226 Stage vs. Storage 12.00 - —. -- 10.00 8.00 - — I — _ —Stage vs. Storage m 6.00 � Design High Water (25 -YR) J 4.00 2.00 0.00 0.000 0.050 0.100 0.150 0.200 0.250 Storage (ac -ft) CONTRIBUTING AREA (acre) 0.95 0.00 OFF -SITE CONTRIBUTING AREA 50 YR VOLUME PLUS (ac -ft) 0.207 ) 4.50 0.041 0.000 5.50 0.041 0.041 6.50 0.041 0.082 7.50 0.041 0.123 8.50 0.041 0.164 9.50 0.041 0.205 10.00 0.041 0.226 CONTRIBUTING AREA (acre) 0.95 0.00 OFF -SITE CONTRIBUTING AREA 50 YR VOLUME PLUS (ac -ft) 0.207 WATER QUALITY VOLUME 50 YR (ft) 9.55 POND ELEVATION i+ 1 ( FEB 011 2013 1 U L.1 ILI PLANK; �G & DEVEI „ PMEN�T CREPT k riT•e nr- n1 1- AiZVJATPP Orifice Calculations VERTICAL CIRCULAR ORIFICE FLOW Q = C a (2 g h)" Diameter (d) = 4.06 Inches _ Orifice Area (a) = 0.0900 Sq.Ft. C Value = 0.60 Coefficient of discharge ORIFICE FLOW AT DHW Orifice D DHW O Orifice H r h PLt NNNG & DEVEI ;- PhPENT DEFT E �1T_i rJF��AI:V�'ATtF P.O.C. N.W. CORNER OF BLK. 82 30'R ON -SITE T FND N &D LBj, ELEV.= 4.35' N.A.VA 1988 SANITARY SEI N. RIM EL= 4.28' S. INV. EL.= 1.28' E. NV. EL= 1.34' N. INV, EL= 1.36' COPYRIGHT 2013 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED George A. Shimp II & Associates, Inc. Anyone copying this document in any manner without the expressed consent of GEORGE A. SHIMP ii & ASSOCIATES, INC. shall be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. DO NOT COPY OR REPRODUCE U Ul 1 LOT 3 1 LOT 10 Lm :R y , t z t.L UTIILITY SERVICE PROVIDERS UTILITY PROVIDER CONTACT PHONE NUMBER UTILITY TYPE \ \Trey20lO \Rick's Drawings \RCx - 2012 \120185 UTILITY_0001.tif U I I 30'R - { I ---------- W ------------------ j PROJECT LOCATION MAP A/C = AIR CONDITIONER FRM = FRAME ACACIA ST. AF = ALUMINUM FENCE FZL = FLOOD ZONE LINE PT = POINT OF TANGENCY SCMERSET ST. CAR = GARAGE - ASPH = ASPHALT CA = GLASS ENCLOSURE rn MANDALAY WE = BASE FLOOD ELEVATION HWF = HOG MIRE FENCE 4 CHANNEL (NOT TO SCALE) REF = REFERENCE BLK BLOCK a RES ; RESIDENCE BM = BENCH MARK a RL = RADIAL LINE BNDY = BOUNDARY LIFE = LOWEST FLOOR ELEV. RLS = REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR BRG = BEARING LHSM = LOWEST HORIZONTAL SUPPORTING MEMBER RND = ROUND z 'k SITE RNG = RANG GLENDALE ST. M d MEASURED RRS = RAIL ROAD SPIKE C8 = CHORD BEARING ;:- . MAS = MASONRY, ROYAL CBS = CONCRETE BLOCK. STRUCTURE MES = WTERED END SECTION SOHO = SET CONCRETE W14UMENT WAY BAY ESPLANADE MH = MANHOLE S/E = SCREENED ENCLOSURE CL = CENTTRUNE MKIL = MEAN HIGH WATER LINE SEC = SECTION GULF OF MSL = MEAN SEA LEVEL SET N&D = SET NAIL AND DISK RLS1 2512 CLOS = CLOSURE MEXICO SIR = SET 1 /2'IRON ROD RLSE 2512 JUANITA N&O = NAIL AND DISK SO = SQUARE GONG = CONCRETE WAY � SRF = SPLIT RAIL FENCE CR = COUNTY ROAD NGVD = NATIGNAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM �i C/S = CONCRETE SLAB NO = NUMBER STY = STORY Z a O/A = OVERALL I E: UAY ESPLANADE __ 11 SECTION 5, TWP. 29 S'., RNG. 15 E., PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA EWER MANHOLE �21' 249' (4' VGP) ' 250' (4' VCP) 241' (6' VCP) 151' (6' VCP) rN$ I n n n n n i if 0 20 40 60 GRAPHIC SCALE 1 inch = 20 feet LEGEND ® - CABLE TV PEDESTAL A- aPC - ELEVATION '*Ci - FIRE HYDRANT ■ - GRATE INLET © - PAYPHONE • - POWER POLE IR - RECLAIMED WATER METER O - RECLAIMED WATER VALVE OS - SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE El - SIGN - TELEPHONE PEDESTAL 10 - VERIZON PEDESTAL ® - WATER METER 0 - WATER VALVE - GUY WIRE - - - OVERHEAD WIRES G - U.C. GAS LINE S - U.G. SANITARY SEWER LINE ----- 5 - - - -- - U.G. SANITARY SEWER LINE PER UTILITY MAP D - U.G. STORM SEWER LINE ----- D - - - -- - U.G. STORM SEWER LINE PER UTILITY MAP ----- W - - - -- - U.G. WATER LINE PER UTILITY MAP 00'■ - AUSTRALIAN PINE 00'0 - BANYAN v0 - NORFOLK PINE 00'4 - OAK OO'A - PALM WE) - PINE CURVE Cl RADIUS = 20'R ARC = 34.15'MC CHORD = 30,15'M CHD. BRG. = 54314'44 "W M CURVE C2 RADIUS = 270'R ARC = 216.04'MC CHORD = 210.32'M CHD. BRG. = S69'15'51 "W M CURVE C3 RADIUS = 10'MC ARC = 23.42'M CHORD = 18.42'M CHD. BRG. = N65'29'03 "W M NOTES CORRESPONDING TO SCHEDULE B 3.) THE SITE IS SUBJECT TO THE PLAT OF - MANDALAY - ISLE OF A THOUSAND PALMS - UNIT NO. 5 ", AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 20, PAGE 27 (ON -SITE AND PLOTTABLE SURVEY MATTERS ARE SHOWN HEREON). CERTIFICATION TO: BAY ESPLANADE PROJECT, LLC THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP OR PLAT AND THE SURVEY ON WHICH IT IS BASED WERE MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2011 MINIMUM STANDARD DETAIL REQUIREMENTS FOR ALTA /ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEYS, JOINTLY ESTABLISHED AND ADOPTED BY ALTA AND NSPS. 'THE FIELD WORK WAS COMPLETED ON JULY 24, 2012. GEORGE A. SHIMP III REGISTRATION NO. 6137 l) LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL 1 LOT 1, BLOCK 82, UNIT NO. 5, MANDALAY REPLAT, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 20, PAGE 27; OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY; FLORIDA AND PLAT BOOK 20, PAGE 48, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 2 LOT 2, BLOCK 82, MANDALAY UNIT #5, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 20, PAGE 27, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, LOT 2, FURTHER DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 82, OF UNIT 5, MANDALAY, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 20, PAGE 48, PINELLAS COUNTY RECORDS; RUN SOUTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF CHEROKEE AVENUE, 248 FEET FOR POB, THENCE RUN N88'0443 "E, 121 FEET; THENCE RUN S01'37'47 "E, 70 FEET; THENCE RUN S88'06'02 "W, 123 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF CHEROKEE AVENUE; THENCE RUN NORTH 70 FEET TO PCB. (CHEROKEE AVENUE IS NOW KNOWN AS POINSETTIA AVENUE) PARCEL 3 LOT 11, BLOCK 82, MANDALAY UNIT NO. 5, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 20, PAGE 27, AND PLAT BOOK 20, PAGE 48, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 4 LOT 12, BLOCK 82, MANDALAY UNIT N0, 5, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 20, PAGE 27; AND PLAT BOOK 20, PAGE 48, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, PARCEL 5 LOT 13, BLOCK 82, MANDALAY UNIT NO. 5, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 20, PAGE 27, AND PLAT BOOK 20, PAGE 48, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. FLOOD ZONE THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY APPEARS TO BE IN ZONE AE (BASE FLOOD ELEVATION OF 11 FEET), IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FIRM MAP OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, PINELLAS COUNTY; COMMUNITY NUMBER 125096 (MAP NUMBER 12103C- 0102 -G), MAP DATED SEPTEMBER 3, 2003, SURVEY ABBREVIATIONS A = ARC LENGTH FPP = FOUND PINCHED PIPE PROP = PROPERTY A/C = AIR CONDITIONER FRM = FRAME PSM = PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR & MAPPER AF = ALUMINUM FENCE FZL = FLOOD ZONE LINE PT = POINT OF TANGENCY ALUM = ALUMINUM CAR = GARAGE PVM'T = PAVEMENT ASPH = ASPHALT CA = GLASS ENCLOSURE RAD = RADIUS WE = BASE FLOOD ELEVATION HWF = HOG MIRE FENCE R = RECORD BLDG BUILDING HWL = HIGH WATER LINE REF = REFERENCE BLK BLOCK INV = INVERT RES ; RESIDENCE BM = BENCH MARK LB = LAND SURVEYING BUSINESS RL = RADIAL LINE BNDY = BOUNDARY LIFE = LOWEST FLOOR ELEV. RLS = REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR BRG = BEARING LHSM = LOWEST HORIZONTAL SUPPORTING MEMBER RND = ROUND 8WF = BARBED WIRE FENCE LS = LAND SURVEYOR RNG = RANG C = CALCULATED M d MEASURED RRS = RAIL ROAD SPIKE C8 = CHORD BEARING ;:- . MAS = MASONRY, R/W = RIGHT -OF -WAY , CBS = CONCRETE BLOCK. STRUCTURE MES = WTERED END SECTION SOHO = SET CONCRETE W14UMENT CHO = CHORD MH = MANHOLE S/E = SCREENED ENCLOSURE CL = CENTTRUNE MKIL = MEAN HIGH WATER LINE SEC = SECTION CLF = CHAIN LINK FENCE MSL = MEAN SEA LEVEL SET N&D = SET NAIL AND DISK RLS1 2512 CLOS = CLOSURE N&B = NAIL AND 80TTLE CAP SIR = SET 1 /2'IRON ROD RLSE 2512 COL = COLUMN N&O = NAIL AND DISK SO = SQUARE GONG = CONCRETE N&T = NAIL AND TAB SRF = SPLIT RAIL FENCE CR = COUNTY ROAD NGVD = NATIGNAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM SR = STATE ROAD C/S = CONCRETE SLAB NO = NUMBER STY = STORY CQR = CORNER O/A = OVERALL SUB = SUBDIVISION COV = COVERED AREA OHW = OVERHEAD WkE(S) S/W = SIDEWALK D = DEED OR = OFFICIAL RECORDS TB = 'r BAR DOT = DEPARTMENT OF TRM49WTATI N 0/S = OFFSET TBM = TEMPORARY BENCH MARK DRNG = DRAINAGE P = PLAT TC = TOP OF CURB D/W = DRIVEWAY PB = PLAT BOOK TOB = TOP OF BANK EL OR ELEV W ELEVATION PC = POINT OF CURVE TOS = TG OF SLOPE EDP = EDGE OF PAVEMENT PCC = POINT OF COMIP011ND CURVE TRANS - TRANSFORMER EOW = EDGE OF WATER PCP = PERMANENT CONTROL POINT TWP = TOWNSHIP ESM'T = EASEMENT PC = PACE TYP = TYPICAL FCM = FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT PK = PARKER KALON UG = UNDERGROUND FES = FLARED END SECTION PL = PROPERTY LINE UTIL = UTILITY FP = FOUND IRON PIPE POB = POINT OF BEGINNING WD= WOOD FR = FOUND IRON ROD POC POINT OF COMMENGEMEO WF =.WOOD FE'10E FL =FLOW LINE P'OL = PONT ON LINE WF = WROUGHT IRON FENCE FID = FELD PP = POWER POLE MIT = WITNESS FND = FOUND PRC = POINT OF' REVIRSE CURVATURE WRF = WIRE FENCE FOP = FOUND OPEN PPE PRM = PERMANENT REFERENCE MONUMENT WV = WATER VALVE FPC = FLORIDA POWER CORP. ## ABBREVIATIONS MAY ALSO BE CONCATENATED AS REQUIRED. �* OTHER COMMONLY RECOGNIZED AND /OR ACCEPTED ABBREVIATIONS ARE ALSO UTILIZED BUT NOT SPECIFIED HEREON. GENERAL NOTES 1. UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED, THE PROPERTY DESCRIPTION SHOWN HEREON WAS PROVIDED BY THE CLIEKT, OR CLIENT'S DESIGNATED AGENT, 2. UNDERGROUND IMPROVEMENTS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO BUILDING FOUNDATIONS, HAVE NOT BEEN LOCATED EXCEPT AS SHOWN HEREON, 3. INACCESSIBLE ABOVE GROUND IMPROVEMENTS (E.G. BUILDING OVERHANGS, THOSE WITHIN SECURED AREAS, ETC.), HAVE NOT BEEN LOCATED EXCEPT AS SHOWN HEREON. 4. THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY TITLE COMMITMENT, COMMITMENT POLICY NO. 27- 30609- 06 -FT16- 11006252, DATED SEPTEMBER 26, 2011. 5. THERE ARE NO VISIBLE ENCROACHMENTS, EXCEPT AS SHOWN HEREON. 6. BECAUSE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF MOVEMENT OF THE MONUMENTATION FROM ITS ORIGINAL PLACEMENT BY PERSONS OTHER THAN THE SURVEYOR, IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT PRIOR TO ANY NEW IMPROVEMENTS ON THE PROPERTY THE POSITION OF THE MONUMENTATION BE VERIFIED, 7. UNAUTHORIZED COPIES AND /OR REPRODUCTIONS VIA ANY MEDIUM OF THIS DOCUMENT OR ANY PORTIONS THEREOF ARE EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT THE SIGNING SURVEYORS WRITTEN CONSENT. 8. BASIS OF BEARINGS IS ASSUMED. 9. ALL BUILDING TIES, PROPERTY MARKER LOCATIONS AND OTHER SITE IMPROVEMENT LOCATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE MEASURED PERPENDICULAR TO ADJACENT BOUNDARY LINES, UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED. 10, FLOOD ZONE DESIGNATION AND /OR FLOOD ZONE LINES (IF ANY) SHOWN HEREON HAVE BEEN SCALED FROM THE REFERENCED MAP AND ARE APPROXIMATE. THE TRUE FLOOD ZONE LINES MUST BE DETERMINED BY AN ENGINEER. 11. THIS SURVEY DOES NOT DETERMINE OR IMPLY OWNERSHIP. 12. THERE MAY BE ADDITIONAL RESTRICTIONS, EASEMENTS OR OTHER MATTERS OF RECORD THAT ARE NOT SHOWN HEREON THAT MAY BE FOUND IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF THIS COUNTY. 13. ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE REFERENCED TO THE NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 (N.A.V.D. 88) AS ESTABLISHED FROM CITY OF CLEARWATER BENCHMARK 1-03" HAVING AN ELEVATION OF 2.6743 FEET (N.A.V.D. 88). 14. A DIG TICKET WAS SUBMITTED WITH SUNSHINE STATE ONE CALL OF FLORIDA ON JULY 19, 2012, TICKET I.D, NUMBER 201203547. THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN HEREON, BASED ON ANY SUBSEQUENT FIELD MARKINGS OR DELINEATIONS PERFORMED BY THE AFFECTED UTILITY PROVIDERS, WERE LOCATED BY A FIELD SURVEY AND ONLY LOCATED AS SHOWN HEREON, ONLY THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WHICH WERE VISIBLE FROM GROUND LEVEL TO THE SURVEYOR ON THE ACTUAL DAY OF THE FIELD SURVEY WERE LOCATED AND ANY UNDERGROUND UTILITIES NOT FIELD MARKED OR DELINEATED ON THE GROUND ARE NOT SHOWN HEREON. NO EXCAVATIONS OR SUBSURFACE WORK EFFORTS OF ANY KIND WERE PERFORMED BY GEORGE A. SHIMP II & ASSOCIATES, INC. TO VERIFY THE EXISTENCE OF ANY UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, THE SURVEYOR MAKES NO GUARANTEE THAT (HE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN COMPRISE ALL SUCH UTILITIES IN THE AREA, EITHER IN SERVICE OR ABANDONED. 0 \1E f 5 D 4'LN'AI�I'sd�e� �, t�.'�.w,ri °�ILVl4:I °•1 iR ALTA /AGSM LANG TITLE SURVEY1TY 01 G'L�,17ArR CERTIFICATION: I HEREBY CERTIFY TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF THAT THE SURVEY SHOWN HEREON SUBSTANTIALLY MEETS THE MINIMUM TECHNICAL STANDARDS FOR LAND SURVEYING DESCRIBED IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA RULE 5J -17, -� -"� DATE F.A.G. FURTHERMORE, THIS CERTIFICATION SHALL NOT EXTEND TO ANY OTHER PERSONS OR PARTIES OTHER THAN THOSE NAMED ON THIS SURVEY AND SHALL NOT BE VALID AND BINDING AGAINST THE UNDERSIGNED SURVEYOR WITHOUT THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL AND SIGNATURE OF THE FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER. ' GEORGE A. SHIMP III, PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR & MAPPER No. 03 z,. JOB NUMBER: 120185 DATE SURVEYED: 7 -24 -2012 DRAWING FILE: 120185.DWG DATE DRAWN: 7 -25 -2012 LAST REVISION: N/A REFERENCE: N/A lo r- GEORGE A. SHIMP 11 AND ASSOCIATES',_ INCORPORATED LAND SURVEYORS LAND PLANNERS 3301 PeSOTO S011LEM", S(IITTf P R.C. P4LYffiRBOR, FLOR111,! 34683 .B 1834 Pfolyl (727) 784;5496 SAP (727) 7Bb =1256 m' CD CD T c O U a P 2 M c m 'a'!' W m 0 0 U) U .Q M U U �4 n rid 20' SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLE I.I AT PROPERTY CORNER t • i CITY OF CLEARWATER GENERAL LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS I �� Dwf. Indian Hawthorn I I lIq) INTERNAL LANDSCAPE VUA REQUIREMENTS 1 I I i Ex. Palm - Typ.— — — — — . r� � —f " PVCF RKING AREA � � ` L , — ' INTERNAL LANDSCAPE VUA AREA REQUIRED. 10%o OE VUA PA 1 ` T�'♦ VUA AREA: 0 SE — PARKING GARAGE WITHIN BUILDING I REQUIRED VUA LANDSCAPE AREA: 0 SE (10% X 0 SF) ©r CD C) PROVIDED VUA LANDSCAPE AREA: 0 SF (0 %) 1 TREE REQU IRED PER 150 SF OF REQUIRED INTERNAL LANDSCAPE VUA2o' SIGHT VISIBILITY I I AREA: TRIANGLE 1 1t 0 / 150 = 0 TREES REQUIRED' TREES PROVIDED FOR INTERNAL LANDSCAPE VUA AREA: 0 TREES 11i II€ ; SHRUBS ARE REQUIRED FOR 50% OF THE REQUIRED INTERNAL Ornamental 'eanut (6U I LANDSCAPE VUA AREA WITH REMAINING AREA COVERED BY GROUND i 1101.1-71M.141 Sabal Palm - (15) BEGIN 6' HIGH WALL Ornamental Peanut --/ � (360) Liriope Em. 06. Lir 1 (142) COVERS, NOT INCLUDING SOD. Dwf. Indian Hawthorn 9 l36) 1 - Simpson's Stopper EXISTING TREE REPLACEMENT REQUIREMENTS O I� Ii Simpson's Stopper icoLum, I (p54) 5' Wide ,Fire Dept. Ascers LJ it 20' SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLE U) o'. I I AT PROPERTY CORNER END 6' HIGH WALL W TRANS � — 0 : DWf. Indian H aw th a .65' V PVCF C COLU z 12) I z W I _ I I (4) e .Juniper (I j ver rum e L 0 8 2013 - I (24) mental Peanut 'wY SIGHT VISIBILITY Dwf Indian Hawthorn TRIANGLE Simpson's Stopper °:I I II p I C II Em. Gd. Liriope, i6) i,- 10.0' �-j ;I II 1 II C Washington P (2) Washington Palm (2) t I I I I Dwf. Indian Howtharn (I 2) 1 I PROPOSED HOTEL (24) (SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR 0. I �) SUMMARY RATING SU ..... ° _: Q EXISTING TREES RATED 3 4, AND 5 PER CONDITION I ° ADDITIONAL FLOOR LEVELS) — Pineapple Guava !Tree ,T♦ II o ARE TO BE REPLACED AT 1 OF REPLACEMENT FOR 1 OF EXISTING Ex. Psalm - Typ. Sea Grape (U _ ._..._.........I::::`....... ..... _ Jr T.. P TREE REMOVED AND PALMS ARE TO BE REPLACED AT 1 " PER PALM (33) " Ornamental ..... Shore Juniper I' + ° -Pink Muhl Slmpson's Stopper (55) eGin�% WALL p I It 022N TREE. TREES RATED 1 AND 2 PER CONDITION RATING SUMMARY DO NOT I (I03) I +, + ' °Q (20) er Tru p ' Hibiscus + Silk/or m e I 51m son's Sta per Washin tan P Im Hibiscus. ++ (Iq) p p g ++ I I ll) I REQUIRE REPLACEMENT. / (24) (2) eo Grope, (I�) Ornarnento11I Peanut Simpson 's Stopper Pink Muhly Fakahatchee Grass Shore uni er``� 1 (155) + + + (15) Em. Gd. iria e (g (33) Pink Muhl + + .: (36) p , I I QUALIFYING TREES REMOVED: 0 TREES @ 0" REQUIRED REPLACEMENT w I I: + ++ p Dwf l=ire Bush (22) Washing on P Im I I" (l0) Washington Palm 2) I Silver Trumpet— I + Pineapple Guava Tree (2) +� Indian Date P �m QUALIFYING PALMS REMOVED: 12 PALMS @ 12" REQUIRED REPLACEMENT w (g) I I + (U () q Bird Of Para di1 e, Sea Grape Pineapple Gua a Tre TOTAL REPLACEMENT REQUIRED: 12" REQUIRED REPLACEMENT Pink Muhl I + + + Fakahatchee Grass + (4Y 1 + + (43) TOTAL REPLACEMENT PROVIDED: 13" TOTAL Indian gate Psalm + * + Bird Of Paradise ° (13" ACCENT TREES I" CALIPER LARGER THAN REQUIRED) — ° I ++ * + Washington Palm LiJ REQUIRED PERIMETER LANDSCAPE BUFFERS III H (3) N (I ibiscus C� Washington Palrj� ; ' + + * BUFFER ATTACHED DWELLINGS AND LIKE USES) CL ()I: +• Dwf. Fire Bush NORTH BU Q + ( 21 ', .: :.... .:_ ,. 10.0. �, White Marble ,...... REQUIRED. 10 WIDE BUFFER WITH 1 TREE PER 35 LF c 100% Dwf. Indian Hawthorn + :. -5" Depth CONTINUOUS HEDGE (36) 301.91 LE 35 = 8.6 = 9 TREES REQUIRED Em. C- d.irio e_ (�) j Em. Gd. Liris�pe. — I; i 1 (25) :. PROVIDED: "10' WIDE BUFFER, 13 PALM TREES + 3 EXISTING PALMS 8c ( ) Liriope m. G ,Dwf. Indian Havel Dorn ~- 12:1 RAMP f Hlbl ) ,i 100 CONTINUOUS HEDGE + GROUNDCOVERS �� s(13 ( 3abal Palm + + + + + + ✓� Nvashinsa (2) Firms` 1'usn g n Palm SOUTH BUFFER STREET FRONTAGE) WIDTH PER OLD FLORIDA, BEACH '`BY I ( Fit neae Guaval tree PP. :. 4 :: ,, :. Pineapple Guava Tree._ DESIGN I j l5) :. f Pird of Paradise REQUIRED: 10' WIDE BUFFER WITH 1 TREE PER 35 LE 8c 100 - (I) CONTINUOUS HEDGE III Goontie 328.65 LF / 35 = 9.4 = 9 TREES REQUIRED III 'F �! (45) � SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLE PROVIDED: 10' WIDE BUFFER, 9 PHOENIX PALMS (SHADE TREE) 8c 100% Ornamental Peanut III f t CONTINUOUS HEDGE + ADDITIONAL SHRUBS 8c GROUNDCOVERS ' ! I It' Indian Date•''Palm 1 I ° '` (4) ( ) 63 STREET FRONTAGE WIDTH PER OLD FLORIDA, BEACH BY # 1 I ' i i (12) - EAST BUFFER ( ) 1 f Pink"Muhl SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLE t F- ((26) y ` DESIGN Vol Of..Parodise + i i Bir Of ParadlII i .. .. I I (2) i men tai Pe Orna Hut I 10 °e I I 9' , WALL FND N &D "PETERSON" J e 0.06'N. 4.37'W. I Y \ .. ..... t.. \.... ....- ....... ti ............ s_ - -_ — — -- wF Shane :Juniper �? // Dwf. Fire Bush ! / ' (14) �f -- — Indian Dar,-- Palm i3ird Of P lradise '. .....': // / LOWEST FLOOR ELEV. = 5.60' a ; h) !f s Ex. F'a lm - TO. Beauty Natal Plum Hibiscus ; z ........... ........... . -------- lls) (I I) (Silver Trumpet .............. CLl � LU Q . T coo 0 a- 0 m LLJ C? ui 0 @ Q2 U) .2 co z 4 fl ti M O 06 U) ¢ tD N N N m W 0 0 co =o E s ri a- W U CD � c� The rninimurn grade For a l l plant material shall be Florida No. I or better, as per the general plant material oua I ity standards per Notes 2G -55, Sheet LA -2. REQUIRED: 10 WIDE BUFFER WITH 1 TREE PER 35 LE m 100 CONTINUOUS HEDGE I t / Shore -Juniper .. .._- 126 PLANT SCHEDULE ® zILL L D C o ©r CD C) ' o TD 0 (� -4- 0 1 13.80 LF 35 = 3.3 — 3 TREES REQUIRED ..... ; ~ Em. Gd. Liriope (qq) TREES BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT � E CAL SIZE v E PROVIDED: 10 WIDE BUFFER, 1 PHOENIX PALM (SHADE TREE) + 2 �� ' f ° ; . Ornamental Peanut ' 7 Feijoa sellowiana Pineapple Guava Tree - J 3 Cal 8` -10 Ht., 3'-4' Sp. � ACCENT TREES & 100% CONTINUOUS HEDGE + ADDITIONAL SHRUBS 8c c (2-1 5) q a- 1 v �0 0 GROUNDCOVERS C ,, ` 12 Phoenix y �estrls I` Indian Date Palm - U? 14 Clear Trunk, Matched 0 p fl N v WEST BUFFER (STREET FRONTAGE) WIDTH PER OLD FLORIDA, BEACH BY j ;' 4 ,t , 20 Sabal palmetto Sabal Palm 14'-16' CT, Varied DESIGN 6 Tobebuia caraiba Silver Trumpet - 3 "Cal 8` -10` Ht., 3` -4` Sp. 0 REQUIRED: 10' WIDE BUFFER WITH 1 TREE PER 35 LF 8c 100% ! f v CONTINUOUS HEDGE c 17 Washingtonia robusta Washington Palm - 16` CT, Matched 193.87 LF % 35 = 5.5 = 6 TREES REQUIRED 2 PHOENIX PALMS (SHADE TREE) + 4 ' . c SHRUBS BOTANICAL NAME `Boxwood COMMON NAME CONT "x20" SPACING PROVIDED: 10' WIDE BUFFER, f.. 15 Carissa macrocarpa Beauty` Beauty Natal Plum 3 gal., 20 3' PALM TREES + 5 EX. PALMS + 1 ACCENT TREE 8c 100 CONTINUOUS Q HEDGE -I- ADDITIONAL SHRUBS & GROUNDCOVERS I 88 Coccoloba uvifera Sea Grape 3 gal., 20 "x20" 3' I 77 Hamelia patens `compacta` Dwf. Fire Bush 3 gal., 20 "x20" 3' BUILDING FOUNDATION LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS I 89 Hibiscus Species Hibiscus 3 gal., 20 "x20" 3' FOUNDATION PLANTINGS TO BE PROVIDED FOR 100% OF BUILDING 128 Muhlenbergia capillaris Pink Muhly 3 gal., 20 "x20" 3 FACADE ALONG STREET RIGHT OF WAY, EXCLUDING AREAS FOR BUILDING ., cu Q INGRESS AND EGRESS, MINIMUM 5' WIDE WITH 2 ACCENT TREES OR 3 N 157 Myrcianthes fragrans Simpson`s Stopper 3 gal., 20 "x20" 4 PALMS FOR EVERY 40 LE AND 1 SHRUB FOR EVERY 20 SF OF hN- 'Alba` REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREA. 50% OF LANDSCAPE AREA TO BE SHRUBS 175 Rhaphiolepis indica Dwf. Indian Hawthorn 3 gal., 14 "x14" 2,50' WITH REMAINING AREA TO BE GROUND COVERS 79 Strelitzia reginae Bird Of Paradise 3 gal., 20 "x20" 3' REQUIRED: 448.67 LF BUILDING FACADE / 40 = 11.2 � o 65 Tripsocum dactyloides Fakahatchee Grass 3 gal., 20 "x20" 3' 11 X 2 ACCENT TREES = 22 ACCENT TREES REQUIRED (OR 33 PALMS) 448.67 X 5' = 2,243.35 SF REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREA GROUND - COVERS BOTANICAL NAME `Arblick` COMMON NAME CONT "x18 ", SPACING 985 Arachis glabrato Ornamental Peanut 12 1 gal. 18" 2,243.35 / 20 = "112.2 = 112 SHRUBS REQUIRED 343 Juniperus conferta Shore Juniper 12 "x18 ", 1 gal.. 24" PROVIDED: 12.3.5 TREES = "I0 ACCENT TREES + 20 PALMS + 2 EX. PALMS, 150 SHRUBS AND 2,500 SF OF LANDSCAPE AREA WITH 639 Liriope muscari `Emerald Goddess` Em. Gd. Liriope 12 "x18 ", 1 gal, 18" REMAINING AREA HAVING ADDITIONAL SHRUBS & GROUND COVERS ", 60 Zamia pumila Coontie 14" x 14 1 dal. 24" 0 20 40 60 feet SCALE: 1" = 20' CONSTRUCTION PLANS ARE NOT VALID UNLESS SIGNED & EMBOSSED WITH LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S SEAL PATRICK D, ROBERSON FLORIDA REGISTERED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT N0. LA0001461 r7 N rfa � ® zILL L D C o ©r CD C) U o TD 0 (� -4- 0 (D ¢ Tn C0 N 4 � E v E U) v T? E o O Uj . J U � U c o' q a- 1 v �0 0 L C +, v 4 a a_ o C3 U? q a_ 0 p fl N v ,o 0 v c 0 . c C LO Q p co c� 0 Q 1 W N U � � 4 ., cu Q o N v hN- J � o r7 N rfa � ® zILL L D C o U o TD 0 (� -4- 0 (D ¢ Tn C0 U � E v E U) v T? E o O Uj . v U � U E o' q a- 1 o �0 0 L +, v 4 a a_ o C3 U? q a_ o p r7 r7 rfa � ® zILL L D C o U CD 0 TD 0 Ln 0 -4- 0 Tn C0 U � E v E v T? E o O E Q v U � U o' v J 1 +, v If M o C3 U? o o p N v ,o 0 U C ® zILL o 0 o U v 0 LANDSCAPE PLAN Project No. 13 -001 �v Date 01/31/13 Sheet LA1 i uopyrlgnt - urawings and concepts may not be used, constructed or reproduced without written permission from Roberson Resource Group, LLC. 6FE: El.- 11.00' THEORETICAL MAXIMUM BUILDING ENVELOPE STUDY STREET LEVEL FACADE STUDY EXTERIOR FINISHES AND OPENING PERCENTAGES STUDY THEORETICAL MAXIMUM BUILDING ENVELOPE ABOVE 45 FT SOUTH ELEVATION: EAST ELEVATION: WEST ELEVATION: NORTH ELEVATION: 19,130 SQ FT SOUTH ELEVATION: 18,962 SQ FT EAST ELEVATION: 8,946 SQ FT WEST ELEVATION: 8,976 SQ FT 7, THEORETICAL BUILDABLE ENVELOPE 25,061 SF X 30 FT HEIGHT 751,830 CF STREETFACADE: 3,071 SQ FT STREET FACADE: 1371 SQ FT STREET FACADE: 1,371 SQ FT GLAZING 963 SQ FT GLAZING 3,294 SQ FT GLAZING 768 SQ FT GLAZING 2,513 SQ FT PROPOSED BUILDING: TRANSPARENT OPENINGS: 2,504 SQ FT TRANSPARENT OPENINGS: 840 SQ FT TRANSPARENT OPENINGS: 898 SQ FT OPENINGS 1,352 SQ FT OPENINGS 3,034 SQ FT OPENINGS 632 SQ FT OPENINGS 181 SQ FT 45 FT TO 65 FT: 16,239 SF X 20 FT HEIGHT 324,780 CF TOTAL: 81% TOTAL: 61% TOTAL: 65% ARCHITECTURAL DETAIL 6,749 SQ FT ARCHITECTURAL DETAIL 2,733 SQ FT ARCHITECTURAL DETAIL 3,214 SQ FT ARCHITECTURAL DETAIL 2,024 SQ FT 65 FT TO 75 FT: 1,368 SF X 10 FT HEIGHT 13,678 CF BALCONIES 2,552 SQ FT BALCONIES 3,069 SQ FT BALCONIES 1,075 SQ FT BALCONIES 1,297 SQ FT TOTAL PROPOSED BUILDING ABOVE 45 FT 338,458 CF TOTAL: 11,616/ 19,130 60% TOTAL: 12,130118,962 63% TOTAL: 5,689/ 8,946 63% TOTAL: 6,015/ 8,976 67% PROPOSED BUILDING PERCENTAGE ABOVE 45 FT 45.02 % OPENINGS ARE ARCHITECTURAL GARAGE SCREENING 5A NU-t� ",Qv F3 fL mom= 4, r D m PENSACOLA 113 West Strong Street, 32501 t. 850 375 8485 1 1. 850 439 0235 CLEARWATER 103 Rogers Street� 33756 t. 727 488 9490 1 f. 727 478 3074 1111VA ISTVAN L. PETERANECZ #AR94533 FLORIDA PROJECT TITLE: (1) M 4_0 0'0__ nwr LL 0 N CU m Q) 4- A-a ;> CL _0 U) C: Uj -0 E 00 0 ISSUED DRAWING LOG: A#DATE: ITEM: A __ FAM A A A A A L FAI 10 PROJECT NO: DEN12.02 DRAWING TITLE: North & South Elevations ISSUE DATE: 2013.05.20 SHEET: �11 ...... -------- This drawing is the property of V behar + peterariecz, inc. and may not be used or reproduced without written perrnission from behar I peteranecz, iric. *qg IN M, 9a i— L i"I", Al", �a M, �I, ___1 1111VA ISTVAN L. PETERANECZ #AR94533 FLORIDA PROJECT TITLE: (1) M 4_0 0'0__ nwr LL 0 N CU m Q) 4- A-a ;> CL _0 U) C: Uj -0 E 00 0 ISSUED DRAWING LOG: A#DATE: ITEM: A __ FAM A A A A A L FAI 10 PROJECT NO: DEN12.02 DRAWING TITLE: North & South Elevations ISSUE DATE: 2013.05.20 SHEET: �11 Building Color 1 BM OC-108 Pale Moon Building Color 2 BM 2097-50 Hint of Mauve MATERIALS LEGEND SCALE: V= 16' Roof: Color 3 Red Tile ENLARGED TYPICAL BUILDING ELEVATION SCALE: V= 8' ZIDI Railings: Color 4 BM 1613 Silent Night THEORETICAL MAXIMUM BUILDING ENVELOPE STUDY THEORETICAL MAXIMUM BUILDING ENVELOPE ABOVE 45 FT THEORETICAL BUILDABLE ENVELOPE 25,061 SF X 30 FT HEIGHT = 751,830 CF PROPOSED BUILDING: 45 FT TO 65 FT: 16,239 SF X 20 FT HEIGHT = 324,780 CIF 65 FT TO 75 FT: 1,368 SF X 10 FT HEIGHT = 13,678 CF TOTAL PROPOSED BUILDING ABOVE 45 FT = 338,458 CF PROPOSED BUILDING PERCENTAGE ABOVE 45 FT = 45.02 % Red Tile Roof Stucco Trim, Color 2 Stucco, Color 2 Signage Location. Prefinished metal railings, typical. Whiff Stucco body Color 2 Stucco, Color 1 Red tile roof Stucco Trim, Color 2 Stucco, Color 1 Building Base Color 2. STREET LEVEL FACADE STUDY SOUTH ELEVATION: EAST ELEVATION: EXTERIOR FINISHES AND OPENING PERCENTAGES STUDY STREET FACADE: 3,071 SQ FT STREET FACADE: 1371 SQ FT STREET FACADE: 1,371 SQ FT NORTH ELEVATION: 19,130 SQ FT SOUTH ELEVATION: 18,962 SQ FT EAST ELEVATION: 8,946 SQ FT WEST ELEVATION: 8,976 SQ FT GLAZING 963 SQ FT GLAZING 3,294 SQ FT GLAZING 768 SQ FT GLAZING 2,513 SQ FT OPENINGS 1,352 SQ FT OPENINGS 3,034 SID FT OPENINGS 632 SQ FT OPENINGS 181 SQ FT ARCHITECTURAL DETAIL 6,749 SID FT ARCHITECTURAL DETAIL 2,733 SID FT ARCHITECTURAL DETAIL 3,214 SQ FT ARCHITECTURAL DETAIL 2,024 SQ FT BALCONIES 2,552 SQ FT BALCONIES 3,069 SQ FT BALCONIES 1,075 SID FT BALCONIES 1,297 SID FT TOTAL: 11,616/ 19,130 = 60% TOTAL: 12,130/ 18,962 = 63% TOTAL: 5,689/ 8,946 = 63% TOTAL: 6,015/ 8,976 = 67% * OPENINGS ARE ARCHITECTURAL GARAGE SCREENING I THEORETICAL MAXIMUM BUILDING ENVELOPE STUDY THEORETICAL MAXIMUM BUILDING ENVELOPE ABOVE 45 FT THEORETICAL BUILDABLE ENVELOPE 25,061 SF X 30 FT HEIGHT = 751,830 CF PROPOSED BUILDING: 45 FT TO 65 FT: 16,239 SF X 20 FT HEIGHT = 324,780 CIF 65 FT TO 75 FT: 1,368 SF X 10 FT HEIGHT = 13,678 CF TOTAL PROPOSED BUILDING ABOVE 45 FT = 338,458 CF PROPOSED BUILDING PERCENTAGE ABOVE 45 FT = 45.02 % Red Tile Roof Stucco Trim, Color 2 Stucco, Color 2 Signage Location. Prefinished metal railings, typical. Whiff Stucco body Color 2 Stucco, Color 1 Red tile roof Stucco Trim, Color 2 Stucco, Color 1 Building Base Color 2. STREET LEVEL FACADE STUDY SOUTH ELEVATION: EAST ELEVATION: WEST ELEVATION: STREET FACADE: 3,071 SQ FT STREET FACADE: 1371 SQ FT STREET FACADE: 1,371 SQ FT TRANSPARENT OPENINGS: 2,504 SQ FT TRANSPARENT OPENINGS: 840 SQ FT TRANSPARENT OPENINGS: 898 SQ FT TOTAL: 81% TOTAL: 61% TOTAL: 65% 27 PENSACOLA 113 West Strong Street, 32 01 t. 850 375 8/1851 f. 850439 0235 CLEAFIWATE11 103 Ao�ters Street. 33756 t. 72/ 488 9490 1 1. 727 478 3074 This drawing i�; the property of Behar -I poteraneoz, inc. and may not be used or reproduced without written permission from Behar + peteranecz, inc. ISTVAN L. PETERANECZ #AR94533 FLORIDA PROJECT TITLE: ISSUED DRAWING LOG DATE: ITEM: FAI A- A- A A FAI FAI PROJECT NO: DEN12.02 LJr'%/-\VVII'4t-1 I I I LC: East & West Elevations 2013-05.20 J 11 SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST �"' � ACACIA ST. � 2. E%CITIN�a CONDITION FLORIDA SOMERSET ST. 1 TY F CLEARWATER, w w MANDALAY 3. SITE FLAN a 4 CHANNEL Q 3 4. PAVING, GRADING, DRAINAGE & UTILITY FLAN z GULF of z 5, DETAILS & CONSTRUCTION MOTES MEXICO GLENDALE 49 a SITE ROYAL 6. DETAILS WAY Ay ESPLANADE BAY ESPLANADE PARCEL 1 LOT 1, BLOCK 82, UNIT NO, 5, MANDALAY REPLAT, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 20, PAGE 27, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA AND PLAT BOOK 20, PAGE 48, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 2 LOT 2, BLOCK 82, MANDALAY UNIT #5, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 20, PAGE 27, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, LOT 2, FURTHER DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 82, OF UNIT 5, MANDALAY, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 20, PAGE 48, PINELLAS COUNT`( RECORDS, RUN SOUTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF CHEROKEE AVENUE, r2 ti'' FEET FOR POB, THENCE RUN N88'04'43 "E, 121 FEET; THENGE,RUN,:S01'37A7 E, -7b FEET; THENCERUN S88'06'02 "Nl, 123 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF CHEROKEE AVENUE; THENCE RUN NORTH 70 FEET TO POB. (CHEROKEE AVENUE IS NOW KNOWN AS POINSETTIA AVENUE) PARCEL 3 LOT 11, BLOCK 82, MANDALAY UNIT NO. 5, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 20, PAGE 27, AND PLAT BOOK 20, PAGE 48, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 4 LOT 12, BLOCK 82, MANDALAY UNIT NO. 5, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 20, PAGE 27, AND PLAT BOOK 20, PAGE 48, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, PARCEL 5 LOT 13, BLOCK 82, MANDALAY UNIT NO. 5, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 20, PAGE 27, AND PLAT BOOK 20, PAGE 48, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. PROJECT TEAM SURVEYOR: George A. Shimp, II & Associates, Inc. 3301 Desoto Boulevard, Suite D Palm Harbor, Florida 34683 (Ph.): (727) 784 -5496, info@shimpsurveying.com ARCHITECT: Behar + Peteranecz, Inc. 103 Rogers Street, Clearwater' Florida 33756 113 W Strong Street, Pensacola Florida 32501 (Ph.): (850) 377 -1870, istvan @architecturebp.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: Roberson Resource Group, LLC 3125 Little Road, #125 Trinity, FL 34655 (Ph.): (727) 255 -4258, patrick @rrgonline.net GEOTECHNiCAL ENGINEER: Gulfcoast Testing Laboratory, Inc. 5745 Park Boulevard Pinellas Park, FL 33781 (Ph.): (727) 5444080 PROJECT COORDINATOR: Joe Burdette (Ph.): (727) 581 -8061 ELEVATIONS ALL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED COPYRIGHT 201: ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Landon, Moree & Associates, Inc - Anyane copying this document in any manner Without ATES; INC. expressed consent of LANQON, MOREE & ASSr), hall be prosecuted to the full extent of The law. p0 NOT DOPY OR REPRODUCE Prepared For: Bay Esplenade Project, LLC 305 CAMBRIDGE ST, SUITE 3 CAMBRIDGE, MA 02141 Ph. (617) 945 -2555 DJD @TheDeNunzioGroup.com Prepared Sy: NEON Landon, Morel &Associates, Inc, Civil & Environmental Engineers - Planners - Surveyors 31622 U.S. 19 NORTH PALM HARBOR, FLORIDA 34684 Phone: (727)789 -5010, Fax: (727)7874394, Toll Free: 1- 800 - 262 -7960 WWW.LMAENGR.COM EB #4096 PERMITS PERMIT TYPE NUMBER APPROVED CITY OF CLEARWATER DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DVA2013 -02001 CITY OF CLEARWATER FLEXIBLE STANDARD APP. FLS2013 -02006 CITY OF CLEARWATER CONSTRUCTION PLAN SWFWMD ERP APPLICATION FDEP WATER FDEP SEWER NOTE TO CONTRACTOR/OWNER CONSTRUCTION IS NOT AUTHORIZED UNTIL PLANS HAVE BEEN ISSUED BY LANDON, MORES & ASSOCIATES, INC. STAMPED "ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION ". ALL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION MUST CONFORM TO THE MINIMUM STANDARDS SET IJORTH IN THE CITY OF CLEARWATER LAND DEVELOPMENT, ZONING, AND /OR RELATED ORDINANCES AND SPECIFICATIONS AS APPLICABLE. TREE BARRICADES $ EROSION CONTROL MEASURES NOTE REQUIRED TREE BARRICADES AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES MUST REMAIN INTACT THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION, ENCROACF1MENT INTO OR FAILURE TO MAINTAIN THESE BARRICADES WILL RESULT IN ENFORCEMENT ACTION WHICH MAY INCLUDE CITATIONS AND /OR PERMIT REVOCATION AS PROVIDED BY THE CITY OF CLEARWATER LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE UTILITY WARNING NOTE _ ABOVE - GROUND OR UNDER - GROUND UTILITIES MAY BE IN THE AREA OF THIS PROJECT - PROCEED WITH CAUTION - CALL "SUNSHINE STATE ONE CALL" (1- 800 - 432 -4770) AND THE UTILITY OWNER(S) BEFORE BEGINNING WORK. PROVIDE. OWNER WITH CODE NUMBER OF PROJECT, SITE DATA PARCEL ID #: 15/29/15/54756/082 /0010, 15/29/15/54756 /082/0020, 15/29/15/541756 /082/0110, 15129/151547561082 /0120 & 15/29115154756/08210130 ZONING DISTRICT: TOURIST, "OLD FLORIDA" (BEACH BY DESIGN) LAND USE: RFH, RESORT FACILITIES HIGH GROSS SITE AREA (UPLAND): 41,232 SF (0.95 ACRES) MAX F.A.R.: N /A, PROPOSED F.A,R.: 1.55 MAX I.S.R.: 0.95, PROPOSED LS.R.: 0.69 MAX BUILDING HEIGHT: 35', PROPOSED: 65' ABOVE BFE p MIN. BUILDING SETBACKS: FRONT - 15', SIDE - 10', REAR - 10' PREVIOUS USE: y 23 UNIT OVERNIGHT ACCOMMODATIONS DEVELOPMENT EXISTING CONDITIONS: TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA: 0 SF (0.0 %) BUILDING AREA: 0 SF (0.0 %) VEHICULAR USE AREA: 0 SF (0.0 %) TOTAL OPEN SPACE: 41,232 SF (100.0 %) PROPOSED CONDITIONS (GROUND FLOOR): TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA: 28,141 SF (68.3 %) BUILDING AREA: 6,104 SF (14.8 %) VEHICULAR USE AREA: 19,297 SF (46.8 %) MISC.IMPERVIOUS AREA: 2,740 SF (6.6 %) TOTAL OPEN SPACE: 13,091 SF (31.7°/x) PARKING REQUIREMENTS: F{EUUIRED: 1.2 SPACES/ ROOM a 102 ROOMS = 123 SPACES PROVIDED: 131 SPACES (INCLUDING 6 H/C SPACES) FLOOD ZONE: THIS PROPERTY LIES WITHIN FLOOD ZONE "AE" (EL. 11, NAVD88) AS DEPICTED ON FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP: 12103C- 0102 -G, EFFECTIVE SEPTEMBER 3, 2003 REVISIONS REVISION DATE I COMMENTS 04 -10 -2013 w � 7 JUANITA 4 � Q WAY M w v 06-12 -2013 REVISIONS PER CITY OF CLEARWATER DRC COMMENTS Z f�r1 Z tJ l Xta' �.: BAY ESPLANADE PARCEL 1 LOT 1, BLOCK 82, UNIT NO, 5, MANDALAY REPLAT, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 20, PAGE 27, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA AND PLAT BOOK 20, PAGE 48, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 2 LOT 2, BLOCK 82, MANDALAY UNIT #5, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 20, PAGE 27, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, LOT 2, FURTHER DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 82, OF UNIT 5, MANDALAY, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 20, PAGE 48, PINELLAS COUNT`( RECORDS, RUN SOUTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF CHEROKEE AVENUE, r2 ti'' FEET FOR POB, THENCE RUN N88'04'43 "E, 121 FEET; THENGE,RUN,:S01'37A7 E, -7b FEET; THENCERUN S88'06'02 "Nl, 123 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF CHEROKEE AVENUE; THENCE RUN NORTH 70 FEET TO POB. (CHEROKEE AVENUE IS NOW KNOWN AS POINSETTIA AVENUE) PARCEL 3 LOT 11, BLOCK 82, MANDALAY UNIT NO. 5, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 20, PAGE 27, AND PLAT BOOK 20, PAGE 48, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 4 LOT 12, BLOCK 82, MANDALAY UNIT NO. 5, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 20, PAGE 27, AND PLAT BOOK 20, PAGE 48, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, PARCEL 5 LOT 13, BLOCK 82, MANDALAY UNIT NO. 5, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 20, PAGE 27, AND PLAT BOOK 20, PAGE 48, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. PROJECT TEAM SURVEYOR: George A. Shimp, II & Associates, Inc. 3301 Desoto Boulevard, Suite D Palm Harbor, Florida 34683 (Ph.): (727) 784 -5496, info@shimpsurveying.com ARCHITECT: Behar + Peteranecz, Inc. 103 Rogers Street, Clearwater' Florida 33756 113 W Strong Street, Pensacola Florida 32501 (Ph.): (850) 377 -1870, istvan @architecturebp.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: Roberson Resource Group, LLC 3125 Little Road, #125 Trinity, FL 34655 (Ph.): (727) 255 -4258, patrick @rrgonline.net GEOTECHNiCAL ENGINEER: Gulfcoast Testing Laboratory, Inc. 5745 Park Boulevard Pinellas Park, FL 33781 (Ph.): (727) 5444080 PROJECT COORDINATOR: Joe Burdette (Ph.): (727) 581 -8061 ELEVATIONS ALL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED COPYRIGHT 201: ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Landon, Moree & Associates, Inc - Anyane copying this document in any manner Without ATES; INC. expressed consent of LANQON, MOREE & ASSr), hall be prosecuted to the full extent of The law. p0 NOT DOPY OR REPRODUCE Prepared For: Bay Esplenade Project, LLC 305 CAMBRIDGE ST, SUITE 3 CAMBRIDGE, MA 02141 Ph. (617) 945 -2555 DJD @TheDeNunzioGroup.com Prepared Sy: NEON Landon, Morel &Associates, Inc, Civil & Environmental Engineers - Planners - Surveyors 31622 U.S. 19 NORTH PALM HARBOR, FLORIDA 34684 Phone: (727)789 -5010, Fax: (727)7874394, Toll Free: 1- 800 - 262 -7960 WWW.LMAENGR.COM EB #4096 PERMITS PERMIT TYPE NUMBER APPROVED CITY OF CLEARWATER DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DVA2013 -02001 CITY OF CLEARWATER FLEXIBLE STANDARD APP. FLS2013 -02006 CITY OF CLEARWATER CONSTRUCTION PLAN SWFWMD ERP APPLICATION FDEP WATER FDEP SEWER NOTE TO CONTRACTOR/OWNER CONSTRUCTION IS NOT AUTHORIZED UNTIL PLANS HAVE BEEN ISSUED BY LANDON, MORES & ASSOCIATES, INC. STAMPED "ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION ". ALL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION MUST CONFORM TO THE MINIMUM STANDARDS SET IJORTH IN THE CITY OF CLEARWATER LAND DEVELOPMENT, ZONING, AND /OR RELATED ORDINANCES AND SPECIFICATIONS AS APPLICABLE. TREE BARRICADES $ EROSION CONTROL MEASURES NOTE REQUIRED TREE BARRICADES AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES MUST REMAIN INTACT THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION, ENCROACF1MENT INTO OR FAILURE TO MAINTAIN THESE BARRICADES WILL RESULT IN ENFORCEMENT ACTION WHICH MAY INCLUDE CITATIONS AND /OR PERMIT REVOCATION AS PROVIDED BY THE CITY OF CLEARWATER LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE UTILITY WARNING NOTE _ ABOVE - GROUND OR UNDER - GROUND UTILITIES MAY BE IN THE AREA OF THIS PROJECT - PROCEED WITH CAUTION - CALL "SUNSHINE STATE ONE CALL" (1- 800 - 432 -4770) AND THE UTILITY OWNER(S) BEFORE BEGINNING WORK. PROVIDE. OWNER WITH CODE NUMBER OF PROJECT, SITE DATA PARCEL ID #: 15/29/15/54756/082 /0010, 15/29/15/54756 /082/0020, 15/29/15/541756 /082/0110, 15129/151547561082 /0120 & 15/29115154756/08210130 ZONING DISTRICT: TOURIST, "OLD FLORIDA" (BEACH BY DESIGN) LAND USE: RFH, RESORT FACILITIES HIGH GROSS SITE AREA (UPLAND): 41,232 SF (0.95 ACRES) MAX F.A.R.: N /A, PROPOSED F.A,R.: 1.55 MAX I.S.R.: 0.95, PROPOSED LS.R.: 0.69 MAX BUILDING HEIGHT: 35', PROPOSED: 65' ABOVE BFE p MIN. BUILDING SETBACKS: FRONT - 15', SIDE - 10', REAR - 10' PREVIOUS USE: y 23 UNIT OVERNIGHT ACCOMMODATIONS DEVELOPMENT EXISTING CONDITIONS: TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA: 0 SF (0.0 %) BUILDING AREA: 0 SF (0.0 %) VEHICULAR USE AREA: 0 SF (0.0 %) TOTAL OPEN SPACE: 41,232 SF (100.0 %) PROPOSED CONDITIONS (GROUND FLOOR): TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA: 28,141 SF (68.3 %) BUILDING AREA: 6,104 SF (14.8 %) VEHICULAR USE AREA: 19,297 SF (46.8 %) MISC.IMPERVIOUS AREA: 2,740 SF (6.6 %) TOTAL OPEN SPACE: 13,091 SF (31.7°/x) PARKING REQUIREMENTS: F{EUUIRED: 1.2 SPACES/ ROOM a 102 ROOMS = 123 SPACES PROVIDED: 131 SPACES (INCLUDING 6 H/C SPACES) FLOOD ZONE: THIS PROPERTY LIES WITHIN FLOOD ZONE "AE" (EL. 11, NAVD88) AS DEPICTED ON FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP: 12103C- 0102 -G, EFFECTIVE SEPTEMBER 3, 2003 REVISIONS REVISION DATE I COMMENTS 04 -10 -2013 REVISIONS PER CITY OF CLEARWATER COMMENTS 05 -16 -2013 REVISIONS PER CITY OF CLEARWATER COMMENTS 06-20 -2013 REVISIONS PER CITY OF CLEARWATER COMMENTS 06-12 -2013 REVISIONS PER CITY OF CLEARWATER DRC COMMENTS SITE PLAN APPROVED CASE # 115 2-0 tl azoo r CASE TYPE 9 DRC DATE 113 CDE BATE . SIGNATURE - DATE - 13- �ty�a389ag2�� ,, Z tJ l Xta' �.: _ '(D -, JUNE 1 , 2013 JOB# 651- 01.000 20 GRAPHIC SCALE 10 20 40 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 20 ft. 1 I I 60 I I II �00 i I II 0 v� APPROX. L OCA TION OF I f EXIST. 12" D/ WATER MAIN (TO BE FIELD VERIFIED) II i I I6' PVCF � I L — II I f FIR 1 I� I � LBO 577E IY I 1 P.O.C. N.W. CORNER OF BLK. B2 (ASPHALT) 6' PVCF LOT 3 II 0- ADJACENT THREE STORY C.B.S. LOWEST FLOOR ELEV. 6.03' S90.00'00 "E EXISTING UTILITIES POLES TO BE REMOVED. PROPOSED U11LI11ES TO BE MOVED UNDERGROUND. CONTRACTOR II q I COORDINATE WITH UTILITY COMPANIES, (TYP.) II 11' TWIN rK p 0 I IIII I e h ,3 ,5• I III LOT 2 I III I I PARCEL 2 0 III I II III I I III tD I III , I j 4•d8 "06'02' W i III � I III 13•• .EC I III I L-Li IIIII I PROP. STAKED SILT III ' FENCE (TYP.) I III � I 13-A 28'X 123'R 'o"x 0 h• 15" h r , 14-A S in 60'R PROP. STAKED SILT FENCE (TYP.) BLOCK 82 LOT 13 PARCEL 5 ` (VACANT) &)K lir QUAD)K 12' 10� ,O• >N PROP, STAKED SILT I I I ADJACENT a I THREE STORY C.B.S. CONC. _ — 0.65' WALL - -02- 12-A c a LOT 10 LEGEND ® - CABLE TV PEDESTAL - ELEVATION - FIRE HYDRANT ■ - GRATE INLET © - PAYPHONE • - POWER POLE ® - RECLAIMED WATER METER O - RECLAIMED WATER VALVE EXISTING UTILITIES POLES TO BE REMOVED. PROPOSED rn l I I I II UTILITIES TO BE MOVED UNDERGROUND. CONTRACTO toy( I I COORDINATE WITH UTILITY COMPANIES. (TYP.) CJ I I s II � a 1I 125'R tD I I F Ill I a 0) EXIST. 6'� WA TER Ml y N I I I I 12'A R CM 4 "x4" �- ALL / 0.22'N. PROP. STAKED SILT I I I I FENCE (TYP.) I I I� LOT 12 z 13 PARCEL 4 0) PARCEL 1 PROP. TREE BARRICADE FIR 1/2" I I I / I I LOT (• )..� LB; 577 I I BLOCK 7 7 ,r- SAN. SEWER MH II I I / I to RIM = 5.21 Lj_j (VACANT) s• TWIN FENCE (TYP.} IN V. = I FIR 1/2" 4/7 W � I I LOT 1 LB# 5778 � N lNI/. =- 250(SE � 1D'� rnl HYIJ AN �E I c31 �a II ji; 5 8 INV. — 2.49(E) CD ° i I ® PARCEL EXIST. UTILITY POLE TO BE — r —�— — �~ M — I I o RELOCATED (COONTRACTOR T tt' TWIN 16' to'� s ' /2" S I ® SIR WALL II s �Z COORDINATE WITH UTILITY PROVIDER) 10" �,2•� LB# 5776 n "� I FNDN&D'PETERSON* 1.03'N. I II PROP. TREE BARRICADE — 14• -- — s--- � _ _— O.Oft 4.31W. 0 2' �_^ _ G-- __ ___ 12 "TWIN rEf� — - - -` -- - - -- —�— �`/ l I IF — �5'WF 12'A so XIS T, 8" GRAVITY SEWER (SIZE TO BE FIELD VERIFIED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION & PRIOR TO ORDERING -STRUCTURES) ON -SITE T.B.M. FND N &D LB# R07 - ELEV.= 4.35' N.A,V.D. 1988 EXIST. SAN, SEWER MH RIM = 4.28 INV. = 1.36(N) I INV. = 1.34(E) IN V, = 1.28(5) I I I I � 1 l I I % EXIST. 8 VCP SAN. SEWER I /� ONE STORY U.B.S. 667 BAY ESPLANADE w LOWEST FLOOR EtEV. = &W 7 8' TRI f rap R� I EXISTING 6" WATER MAIN / - --W_-- --- 0\ _ ON SITE T.B.M. EXISTING UTILITIES POLES TO BE REMOVED. PROPOSED FND N &D LB# 6168 / TILITIES TO BE MOVED UNDERGROUND, CONTRACTOR ELEV.= 5.27 COORDINATE WITH UTILITY COMPANIES, (TYP.) N.A.V,D. 1988 OP 1/2" � I I X19• � � � � - � t/° f I I FOP 1/2' ! f f I.A 1\ / EXIST 12 " RCP ST�DIZt�IItWATER POLLUTION REVENTIC?N NOTES �- ' BACKFILLED TRENCH . �; -`,, �� /��, �[f�/ BEEN FASTENED TO THE POSTS. FIRST FENCE ROTATE BOTH 1. The contractor shall at a minimum implement the stormwater pollution prevention measures as shown in this Q - SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE plan set. These measures may include, but not limited to, the construction of retention /detention ponds, I II A CLOCKWDEGREES TO control structures, tree barricades, and silt fences. FILTER MATERIAL SECURELY APPROXIMATELY 8 h o - SIGN W I I SEAL WITH THE FIR 1/2" RLS# 2512 POSTS OR WIRE MESH FABRIC MATERIAL IF USED. MUST EXTEND INTO ® - TELEPHONE PEDESTAL ADJACENT a I I I DRIVE BOTH S.W. COR. OF THE N. 5' OF LOT 11, BLOCK 77 -M LLJ _ ® - VERIZON PEDESTAL N- WATER METER o I THREE STORY C.B.S. POSTS ABOUT 10 INCHES INTO THE II i I ) W Y$ (2) _ WATER VALVE I WOOD OR STEEL POSTtiA� III W c� --� GUY WIRE PVCF TRANS II „� I I measures in order to reduce airborne transportation of sediments. measures IM — - --0— - OVERHEAD WIRES — — - U.G. GAS LINE COLUM II i , 1 .° FILTER FABRIC SILT FENCE 4. The contractor shall at a minimum inspect the above referenced measures at least once a week or within 14• I I *a I ' CITY INDEX NO, 607; 1 OF 3 — —S° — - U.G. SANITARY SEWER LINE 121'R FIR 1/2 I I 30'R".' permit violation shall be noted and corrective measures shall noted. given — —S— — - U.G. SANITARY SEWER LINE PER UTILITY MAP ' APPROXIMATE Landon, Moree & Assoc., Inc. after construction completion. — —D— — - U,G. STORM SEWER LINE J17ELEV.= ITE T.B.M. THE FIVE PALMS MOTEL, —D— — - U.G. STORM SEWER LINE PER UTILITY MAP j _* AIL 4 DISK developer. A CON D 0 M I N I U M —w— -- U.G. WATER LINE PER UTILITY MAP I QD ■ - AUSTRALIAN PINE 14 5• 12 I I N.A.V.D. 1988 CONDO P. B. 73 P G S. 69 CSC 70 00*0 - BANYAN I I I OTT ° NORFOLK PINE LOT 11 o I I 0, - OAK 0 . �I i OTA - PALM PARCEL 3 ;Q o HI I II , oo'❑ - PINE I I ,0K - TREE TO BE REMOVED EXISTING UTILITIES POLES TO BE REMOVED. PROPOSED rn l I I I II UTILITIES TO BE MOVED UNDERGROUND. CONTRACTO toy( I I COORDINATE WITH UTILITY COMPANIES. (TYP.) CJ I I s II � a 1I 125'R tD I I F Ill I a 0) EXIST. 6'� WA TER Ml y N I I I I 12'A R CM 4 "x4" �- ALL / 0.22'N. PROP. STAKED SILT I I I I FENCE (TYP.) I I I� LOT 12 z 13 PARCEL 4 0) PARCEL 1 PROP. TREE BARRICADE FIR 1/2" I I I / I I LOT (• )..� LB; 577 I I BLOCK 7 7 ,r- SAN. SEWER MH II I I / I to RIM = 5.21 Lj_j (VACANT) s• TWIN FENCE (TYP.} IN V. = I FIR 1/2" 4/7 W � I I LOT 1 LB# 5778 � N lNI/. =- 250(SE � 1D'� rnl HYIJ AN �E I c31 �a II ji; 5 8 INV. — 2.49(E) CD ° i I ® PARCEL EXIST. UTILITY POLE TO BE — r —�— — �~ M — I I o RELOCATED (COONTRACTOR T tt' TWIN 16' to'� s ' /2" S I ® SIR WALL II s �Z COORDINATE WITH UTILITY PROVIDER) 10" �,2•� LB# 5776 n "� I FNDN&D'PETERSON* 1.03'N. I II PROP. TREE BARRICADE — 14• -- — s--- � _ _— O.Oft 4.31W. 0 2' �_^ _ G-- __ ___ 12 "TWIN rEf� — - - -` -- - - -- —�— �`/ l I IF — �5'WF 12'A so XIS T, 8" GRAVITY SEWER (SIZE TO BE FIELD VERIFIED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION & PRIOR TO ORDERING -STRUCTURES) ON -SITE T.B.M. FND N &D LB# R07 - ELEV.= 4.35' N.A,V.D. 1988 EXIST. SAN, SEWER MH RIM = 4.28 INV. = 1.36(N) I INV. = 1.34(E) IN V, = 1.28(5) I I I I � 1 l I I % EXIST. 8 VCP SAN. SEWER I /� ONE STORY U.B.S. 667 BAY ESPLANADE w LOWEST FLOOR EtEV. = &W 7 8' TRI f rap R� I EXISTING 6" WATER MAIN / - --W_-- --- 0\ _ ON SITE T.B.M. EXISTING UTILITIES POLES TO BE REMOVED. PROPOSED FND N &D LB# 6168 / TILITIES TO BE MOVED UNDERGROUND, CONTRACTOR ELEV.= 5.27 COORDINATE WITH UTILITY COMPANIES, (TYP.) N.A.V,D. 1988 OP 1/2" � I I X19• � � � � - � t/° f I I FOP 1/2' ! f f I.A 1\ / EXIST 12 " RCP ST�DIZt�IItWATER POLLUTION REVENTIC?N NOTES �- ' BACKFILLED TRENCH . �; -`,, �� /��, �[f�/ BEEN FASTENED TO THE POSTS. FIRST FENCE ROTATE BOTH 1. The contractor shall at a minimum implement the stormwater pollution prevention measures as shown in this POSTS AT LEAST IN plan set. These measures may include, but not limited to, the construction of retention /detention ponds, FABRIC A CLOCKWDEGREES TO control structures, tree barricades, and silt fences. FILTER MATERIAL SECURELY APPROXIMATELY 8 h DIRECTION CREATE A THEY W FASTENED TO THE INCHES OF FILTER SEAL WITH THE 2. In addition to the measures shown in this plan Set, the contractor shall take all necessary and practical POSTS OR WIRE MESH FABRIC MATERIAL IF USED. MUST EXTEND INTO FABRIC MATERIAL measures in order to reduce erosion and sedimentation t0 both on —site and off —site surface waters, lakes, and hay bales inlets, floating turbidity A TRENCH AND BE ANCHORED WITH DIRECTION OF RUNOFF WATERS DRIVE BOTH wetlands. These measures may include, but not limited to, at stormwater of steeps with sodding or seeding /mulching, site entrance /exit -M LLJ _ COMPACTED BACKFILL MATERIAL MOE POSTS ABOUT 10 INCHES INTO THE barriers, hay bale dikes, stabilization grades Control stabilization With gravel, temporary Sediment basins and berms. ) W Y$ GROUND AND BURY FLAP WOOD OR STEEL POSTtiA� W c� 3. In addition to the measures shown in this plan set, the contractor shall take all necessory and practical These may include, but not >6 '� RUNOFF y INSTALLING A measures in order to reduce airborne transportation of sediments. measures IM limited to, site watering nd additional silt fence installation. g i , 1 .° FILTER FABRIC SILT FENCE 4. The contractor shall at a minimum inspect the above referenced measures at least once a week or within *a I ,,,f CITY INDEX NO, 607; 1 OF 3 each inspection. An 24 hours after 0.25 inches of rainfall. An inspection report shall be Completed fore p y taken be This report shall be to / 10 INCHES *. % N.T.S. permit violation shall be noted and corrective measures shall noted. given {MIN} �/( ' APPROXIMATE Landon, Moree & Assoc., Inc. after construction completion. ; 4 -INCH BY 4-INCH TRENCH 5. The cost of implementing the above measures are to be included within the contractors contract with the j _* developer. COPYRIGHT 2013 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Landon, Moree & Associates, Inc. Anyone copying this document in any manner wllhout the expressed consent of LANDON, MORES & ASSOCIATES, INC. shall be prosecuted to the full extent of the la w. ® DO NOT COPY OR REPRODUCE N. I.s. r0 CD F no W Z Z Zw(0 m ww _� 0Z Z� 0- _j Lu LL F- o In U Z'N' �Ow �LU � �Qo a LL1ZU) U�< EL s Z o6 O W w Ofrn a Z N Z O O O Z ¢ J 0 W > - W 0Z(/? r u o LID r o N Z O U) p ° rn to 0 h w N Q J < J N LL LL. o C T� 4i U I E2 0 to v o d M 0 W 4McJ PONDING HEIGHT EXTRA STRENGTH FILTER FABRIC h Z a..._? co _ ` :.. NN FILTER FABRIC NEEDED WITHOUT WIRE MESH SUPPORT { I I E i, H 6 STEEL OR ATTACH SECURELY N C d N J WOOD POST T4 UPSTREAM -.t 36" HIGH MAX. SIDE OF POST :.T ..z.I... ° ` = z..`1 :- t 1 FLOW RUNOFF STEEL OR O WOOD POST tp � � Q � P h i E. ��1- FLO G d. Y w " tC1 W 12" MIN. "0 p, O / 4` x 6• TRENCH i 1 "i; € I $ �1 G N AITH COMPACTED I _ FLOW g 0).L'. 1 \\? BACKFP_L g ( € f ��- J MEN t4 ra- 2 STANDARD DETAIL �� ' 10' MAX. SPACING WITH ® ®� L - TRENCH WITH NATIVE BACKFILL ��r f�' WIRE SUPPORT FENCE L N a 6' MAX. SPACING WITHOUT ■ ®E SNp H t� WARE SUPPORT FENCE '> MONO 0 POtIDING HEIGHT � \"' '� ��. _�>�` -t � �'/�'�`•r RUNOFF MAX NOTES: ' 9" (RECOMMENDED) 1, INSPECT AND REPAIR FENCE AFTER EACH \ STORM EVENT AND REMOVE SEDIMENT WHEN STORAGE HT. �.y � NECESSARY. '• C , \` a 2. REMOVED SEDIMENT SHALL BE DEPOSITED3 THAT j" INSTALLING A SEDIME NT AREA OFF -SIT EVAND hCAN CONTRIBUTE d,Z ceJ. , PERMANENTLY STABILIZED. 9 r . 07 " 12" MIN. % f FILTER FABRIC SILT FENCE 3. SILT FENCE SHALL BE PLACED ON SLOPE �� rte- CITY INDEX NO. 607; 3 OF 3 CONTOURS TO MAXIMIZE PONDING EFFICIENCY.a P 7 t17' i�. " C GRA`fL N.T.S. L -o, ' j6 LL ALTERNATE DETAIL TRENCH WITH GRAVED S H EXISTIN CON 2 E ITIR^j T OF 6 0 CO h W �r " �1i%7 LLI C7 W 2i ■M P_ (1) U) LLI N -M LLJ _ MOE W < U a-U U) Lo W c� >6 Crf IM to v o d M 0 W 4McJ PONDING HEIGHT EXTRA STRENGTH FILTER FABRIC h Z a..._? co _ ` :.. NN FILTER FABRIC NEEDED WITHOUT WIRE MESH SUPPORT { I I E i, H 6 STEEL OR ATTACH SECURELY N C d N J WOOD POST T4 UPSTREAM -.t 36" HIGH MAX. SIDE OF POST :.T ..z.I... ° ` = z..`1 :- t 1 FLOW RUNOFF STEEL OR O WOOD POST tp � � Q � P h i E. ��1- FLO G d. Y w " tC1 W 12" MIN. "0 p, O / 4` x 6• TRENCH i 1 "i; € I $ �1 G N AITH COMPACTED I _ FLOW g 0).L'. 1 \\? BACKFP_L g ( € f ��- J MEN t4 ra- 2 STANDARD DETAIL �� ' 10' MAX. SPACING WITH ® ®� L - TRENCH WITH NATIVE BACKFILL ��r f�' WIRE SUPPORT FENCE L N a 6' MAX. SPACING WITHOUT ■ ®E SNp H t� WARE SUPPORT FENCE '> MONO 0 POtIDING HEIGHT � \"' '� ��. _�>�` -t � �'/�'�`•r RUNOFF MAX NOTES: ' 9" (RECOMMENDED) 1, INSPECT AND REPAIR FENCE AFTER EACH \ STORM EVENT AND REMOVE SEDIMENT WHEN STORAGE HT. �.y � NECESSARY. '• C , \` a 2. REMOVED SEDIMENT SHALL BE DEPOSITED3 THAT j" INSTALLING A SEDIME NT AREA OFF -SIT EVAND hCAN CONTRIBUTE d,Z ceJ. , PERMANENTLY STABILIZED. 9 r . 07 " 12" MIN. % f FILTER FABRIC SILT FENCE 3. SILT FENCE SHALL BE PLACED ON SLOPE �� rte- CITY INDEX NO. 607; 3 OF 3 CONTOURS TO MAXIMIZE PONDING EFFICIENCY.a P 7 t17' i�. " C GRA`fL N.T.S. L -o, ' j6 LL ALTERNATE DETAIL TRENCH WITH GRAVED S H EXISTIN CON 2 E ITIR^j T OF 6 1'r 1N e GRAPHIC SCALE 20 0 10 20 40 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 20 ft. I V 20' SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLE SIDEWALKS TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH ADA STANDARDS PER FDOT INDEX #304 W -w CL LLJ W zr- � w w w o p w COPYRIGHT 2013 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Landon, Moree & Associates, Inc. Anyone copying this document in any manner without the expressed consent of LANDON, MORES & A550,67A7"ES, INC. shall be prosecuted to the full extent of lire law. DO NOT COPY OR REPRODUCE 80 LOT 3 I m Q 8 LOT 10 I 20' SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLE �AT PROPERTY CORNER I I I SIDEWALKS TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH ADA II STANDARDS PER FDOT I I INDEX #304 I II � II I III �,I I LEGEND ° 9 - CABLE TV PEDESTAL - ELEVATION 'Cf - FIRE HYDRANT Z - GRATE INLET ©- PAYPHONE • a I - RECLAIMED WATER METER O �I ADJACENT - SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE I (ASPHALT) ® THREE STORY C.B.S. I ® _ I 0 I LOWEST FLOOR ELEV. 6.03' - WATER VALVE 5' FIRE DEPT. ACCESS 6 N - OVERHEAD WIRES {ti I - U.G. GAS LINE COLUM - U.G. SANITARY SEWER LINE I I CONSTRUCT DRIVEWAY CONNECTION CI - U.G. STORM SEWER LINE I ER FDOT INDEX #515 BEGIN 6' HIGH WALL ' L _ NONE 6' VCF® i ------ - - - - -- �6' PVCF -_ - - _ - -- -- - - - - -- 15'S Z 1 - - -_ li i:i z 18*A 0 Z 4 10' LANDSCAPE BUFFER /BUILDING SETBACK -- 14 23.0 I m Q 8 LOT 10 I 20' SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLE �AT PROPERTY CORNER I I I SIDEWALKS TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH ADA II STANDARDS PER FDOT I I INDEX #304 I II � II I III �,I I LEGEND ° 9 - CABLE TV PEDESTAL - ELEVATION 'Cf - FIRE HYDRANT Z - GRATE INLET ©- PAYPHONE • - POWER POLE B - RECLAIMED WATER METER O - RECLAIMED WATER VALVE - SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE El - SIGN ® - TELEPHONE PEDESTAL ® - VERIZON PEDESTAL 0 - WATER METER 0 - WATER VALVE - GUY WIRE 6 N - OVERHEAD WIRES {ti -- —G— — — - U.G. GAS LINE - U.G. SANITARY SEWER LINE - U.G. SANITARY SEWER LINE PER UTILITY MAP CI - U.G. STORM SEWER LINE THE FIVE PALMS MOTEL, - U.G. STORM SEWER LINE PER UTILITY MAP A CON D OM I N I U M - U.G. WATER LINE PER UTILITY MAP Oc'■ - AUSTRALIAN PINE CONDO P.B. 73, PGS. 69 & 70 0TO — BANYAN I LL ove - NORFOLK PINE -3 VA - OAK c i= WAk - PALM U) ro OO'❑ - PINE ° 0 V ■w W CD N < J N U a � iv v 0 0 LU • cCn LU w° VJ Co LLI 0wo (7 ED U) Lo W o m CD ° 41 _ In .. W Z 2 pP*�Z1yy �0 = N -% .5 0 M d C 4 Lim p r W 6 N C {ti ❑ U Q 19-0 o E C CI W n OMEN W ' L _ NONE r -_ li i:i z 0 Z .. -�"'�� w -1 w U m0 ua LL io 0 (n 1) J - w J W o L) 0 0 0 ❑ O W Z N U Q4� 00'-z t� z 0 0 0 0 0 0 �7 � wZ(n 4'J V V U < IL CL a 4 Z cd 0 w 0 LLJ In 0© 0 0 w W (1)V� W W W Z w wl w 2 �2 :2 t2 c~nz 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N z 0 Q Q O tb N N U z 0 o 0 0 0 J 0 w> 0 0 z 0 o II N �' o o � z w 0 U) 0 ° d Z U I LL ove - NORFOLK PINE -3 VA - OAK c i= WAk - PALM U) ro OO'❑ - PINE ° 0 V ■w W CD N < J N U a � iv v 0 0 LU • cCn LU w° VJ Co LLI 0wo (7 ED U) Lo W o m CD ° 41 _ In .. W M a 1 0 2 pP*�Z1yy M e( = N -% .5 0 M d C 4 Lim p r W 6 N C {ti awN Q 19-0 o E C CI OMEN W ' L _ NONE r -_ li .. -�"'�� w -1 20 T N GRAPHIC SCALE 0 10 20 40 ( IN FEET ) 1 itch = 20 ft. i ao OWNER'S INSTRUCTIONS FOR MAINTENANCE AND INSPECTION OF STORMWATER FACILITIES The entire storm water system should be inspected on at least a semi-annual basis. This should include a visual inspection of the pond, pond banks, bleed -down orifices, other control structures, and discharge pipes. These should be kept freo of debris and cleaned on a frequency as required to keep them functional, as designed. Mowing /clearing around the structures may be required to prevent vegetation from clogging them. Sediment sumps, if designed and installed, should have setliment removed as necessary to allow them to efficiently remove suspended particles. They should be re-dug to the original design specifications, if silted in. For underdrain treatment ponds /swales, the owner of the facility shall inspect the pond bottom periodically after heavy rainfall events to check for persistent ponding or pooling of water. All large debris shall be removed and disposed of elsewhere. The underdrain area shall also be maintained clear of vegetation. If prolonged ponding persists, i.e., in excess of 72 hours, the owner shall flush the underdrain system. If required, the underdrain shall be removed and replaced with new underdrain as directed by a licensed civil engineer. Please check the construction plans to see if written reports on monitoring or plant survival rates are required to be sent to any reviewing agencies. Written notes should always be kept which describe maintenance activities undertaken during each inspection. Specific conditions of all permits may require additional maintenance activities above and beyond those outlined above. Please be aware of all permit conditions as issued by regulatory agencies to ensure permit compliance. LEGEND - CABLE TV PEDESTAL - ELEVATION FIRE HYDRANT ■ GRATE INLET PAYPHONE - POWER POLE - RECLAIMED WATER METER T RECLAIMED WATER VALVE E ,�I I B" UNDERDRAIN COPYRIGHT 2013 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Landon, Moree & Associated, Inc. Anyone copying this document in any manner irlthout the expressed consent of LANDON, MORSE & ASSOCIATES, INC. shell be prosecuted to the full extent of the low. -DO NOT COPY OR REPRODUCE UTILITY CONNECTION NOTE CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WATER & WASTEWATER SERVICE LOCATIONS (AT BUILDING) WITH ARCHITECTURAL PLAN SECTION A -A N.T.S. * #VAULT/PARKING GARAGE /BUILDING STRUCTURE SHALL BE DESIGNED BY OTHERS SECTION B -B N.T.S. V. ALL ROOF RUN -OFF SHALL BE PIPED DIRECTLY TO STORMWATER VAULT. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE PLACEMENT OF YARD DRAINS AND YARD DRAIN PIPES W/ ENGINEER AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO AVOID CONFLICTS. ALL ELEVATIONS REFER TO NAVD 88 DATUM UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED i C1 � lak 1W — A W MCI Li I I M Ik - GENERAL NOTES: "�- 1 z T 1. T THE ENGINEER AND SWFWMD MUST BE PRESENT FOR T �1 Q V LLJ O THE INSTALLATION OF THE WATER I ' CD A [__ QUALITY UNDERDRAIN. A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS ADVANCE NOTICE IS REQUIRED. REFERENCE ' � C[ CD 0 �.L SWFWMD PERMIT FOR SPECIFIC CONDITIONS. � EXIST. G GRATE INLET VAULT WALL & BUILDING WALL Q U aU TOP = 3 3.75 S Q TO BE COMMON WALL IF POSSIBLE 2 2. P PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF THE UNDERDRAIN FILTER MEDIA, THE PERMITTEE'S CONTRACTOR �` � 1.65 P/L co D Q� SHALL SUBMIT A CERTIFIED TEST OF THE MEDIA TO THE PERMITTEE'S PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER , A iii Z Q AND SWFWMD. THE TEST SHALL ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING PARAMETERS: UNIFORMITY I ' ' ` HOTEL F.F. - 11.00 P PARKING GARAGE ELEV. VARIES C COEFFICIENT, EFFECTIVE GRAIN SIZE, SIEVE ANALYSIS, PERCENT SILTS, CLAYS AND ORGANIC ` , L U MATTER, AND PERMEABILITY TESTING (CONSTANT HEAD). I ' 1 10.0 - D DISTANCE VARIES T TOP ELEV. = 1Q.OQ 3. E EXISTING ELEVATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EXISTING UTILITY - P w LL PROP. STORMWATER VAULT 50 YEAR DHWL = 9.55 E ELEVATIONS AND HORIZONTAL LOCATIONS A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. NV - 4 EXISTING _ n n 4 WQ ELEV. = 5.47 P 4' I IN. E PROP. OUTFALL STRUCTURE O ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED OF ANY CONFLICTS OR DISCREPANCIES IN ELEVATION A MINIMUM / W WALL — I W SHWL "` 3,5 C Via_® OF 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE CONTRACTOR In EXIST. GRADE P PARKING GARAGE ELEV. VARIES S _j W w w w COMPLETE THESE PROCEDURES PRIOR TO ORDERING ANY STRUCTURES. 0- Z 0 0 BOTTOM = 4.5 1 18 RCP 4 4. C CONTRACTOR IS CAUTIONED THAT GAS MAINS ARE IN THE VICINITY. CONTRACTOR SHALL USE De CAUTION WHEN CONSTRUCTION WITHIN RIGHT -OF -WAY. 6" MIN. P /TqNU PROP. C.O. O ti C F- F- 5, P PROPOSED PARKING GARAGE /BUILDING SHALL BE STRUCTURALLY DESIGNED BY OTHERS. ��' , < ao� COPYRIGHT 2013 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Landon, Moree & Associated, Inc. Anyone copying this document in any manner irlthout the expressed consent of LANDON, MORSE & ASSOCIATES, INC. shell be prosecuted to the full extent of the low. -DO NOT COPY OR REPRODUCE UTILITY CONNECTION NOTE CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WATER & WASTEWATER SERVICE LOCATIONS (AT BUILDING) WITH ARCHITECTURAL PLAN SECTION A -A N.T.S. * #VAULT/PARKING GARAGE /BUILDING STRUCTURE SHALL BE DESIGNED BY OTHERS SECTION B -B N.T.S. V. ALL ROOF RUN -OFF SHALL BE PIPED DIRECTLY TO STORMWATER VAULT. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE PLACEMENT OF YARD DRAINS AND YARD DRAIN PIPES W/ ENGINEER AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO AVOID CONFLICTS. ALL ELEVATIONS REFER TO NAVD 88 DATUM UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED i C1 � lak 1W — A W MCI Li I I M Ik - (0 O 0 w H Q 171 v R 0 Z IS H C dN 2 0 C6 a� 6 ! tQ0 W L U N to - 4 43 rg no C E a f4 � J ` raiy cc ■■®E LU L = N■■■ o®■ F A ,n .0 Z cy:): :a _j L7. U w LL' S H 4 E T OF 6 illlll z T V LLJ O W W CD A [__ VJ LIJ C[ CD 0 �.L d U Q U aU (/) LS i C3 Q W n co D Q� iii Z Q L U M Q w LL = °w C U) Z Via_® In _j W w w w 0- Z 0 0 0 < D De /TqNU 4 O ti C F- F- < ao� Qo W Z u CCQ 4 w a w a w a ®®` Z*6 (W N N I0 u1 LLI V P: it � M 5; � � (/? Z n M :2 04 04 04 z O z �a 4 0 0 0 �w >Tcn ®0zW b N c7 O If N r L0 r tQ Q 2E (N 0 hi Z U (n p Q z W N to IL LL U a err_ W TJ U N LL fj d 12 0 iJ 0 F (0 O 0 w H Q 171 v R 0 Z IS H C dN 2 0 C6 a� 6 ! tQ0 W L U N to - 4 43 rg no C E a f4 � J ` raiy cc ■■®E LU L = N■■■ o®■ F A ,n .0 Z cy:): :a _j L7. U w LL' S H 4 E T OF 6 illlll T V LLJ W W CD A [__ VJ LIJ C[ CD 0 �.L m Q U aU (/) LS i C3 Q co LU co m (0 O 0 w H Q 171 v R 0 Z IS H C dN 2 0 C6 a� 6 ! tQ0 W L U N to - 4 43 rg no C E a f4 � J ` raiy cc ■■®E LU L = N■■■ o®■ F A ,n .0 Z cy:): :a _j L7. U w LL' S H 4 E T OF 6 . - 1 1NSPEC77LW RANIIAyr ,,. " ,v ,a ur - - I _ _- --- - -._., 1. ON HYDRANTS REWIRING RUNOUT THE ' • J SEW£R GE•NE•RAL Nn7F.S• . ` 3. INSTALL 3' BRASS IDENTIFICATION DISK W CONCRETE. (TYP.) Q Max. 15' - Min. 4' � i- ,.- 1NLE _. _ ,�» -�•�- i , 4. INSTALL 2- PVC WITH PLUG FOR TRACER WIRE STORAGE, - LAST TWO JOINTS Must BE RESTRAINED ! -_. MA IN - .� -.-j. • ' 6. LOCATOR WIRE ACCESS - 2' (WHITE OR GRAY) SCHEDULE BO PVC, BRA`w5 FEMALE ADAPTOR COUPUNG AND 2' BRASS PLUG W/ RECESS NUT, (SEE DETAIL 403 SHEET 2 OF 2). 18' Mir'. _ ry F1•.. OUTLET �, _.„ 11 --�' 1• lire lnterC for system may Consist of multi le TERMINATE INSULATED, SOLID 12 GAUGE POPPER TRACER WIRE AT TOP W/ A MINIMUM 12' OF EXTRA PARE, 24" Max. @Oak of Curb INLET �LWENNGG�£- 1 ( 1 - + - - }' y p 2 -12G c 2 HYDRANT RUN OUTS SHALL BE Distance Varies or B 4 /nteravp tar ce / /s, If required grBp#er than 1250 gp//pn •. o Mach. Joint Valve MAXIMUM 10 FEET OR LESS - Ede of Pavement -\ w W U f I, ! - - �' i •. ~�•* -r• capacity. :. /'. ' Tracer wires Connecting Piece w /Integrally O - -(Sae Note 3) g W f FROM WATER MAW. 2. One sampling cell per system shall be installed at outfoll Corr a5tec1:,9ub�ra�e cast End-D.I. Joint Gland on NOTES Oq 0' PRECAST BAFFLE° 4' THICK `�- • --�+°' C SAMPLING - c w 3' BRASS IDEHTIFlCATKNI DISK One End -D.I. Rotatable Mech. 3. ON HYDRANT RUNWIS GREATER I. STEAMER CONNECTION T4 iJJ Q r I ii _ .• C �+ 4 CELL to mule, only if required. " 2» PVC < Joint Gland on Other End. THAN 10 FEET, INSTALL MECH. JOINT FACE STREET. I LL p' SAMPLING Concrete wall coating taking into consideration the , 2'x2' CONCRETE PAD - '� �� VALVE AT MAIN AND AT HYDRANT, J CELL PRECAST BAFFLE ('IF REQUIRED) 0 watery ail mix. See Note 1 (Sao Index M 402, 1O TYPE OF VALVE. Distance Varies 2. ALL FIRE HYDRANTS TO HAVE f < E SIZE OF VALVE See Note 1 5 1/C VALVE SEAT. Valve Box 1 = W (IF REQUIRED ' 4' n+lrar r 4, Contractor to supply & instal/ o// i in and sanitary Shoat 2 of 5) I BUTTERFLY, GATE OR PLUG - ( ) ONLY APPROVED ( % PPy piping Y �� o - ONLY APPROVED (See Note 4) #' 3 -Piece Adjustable N 3. FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE stor Boni 5oes tees Clean -outs for cleaning toward and away from f�; ¢" PLACED AT STREET CORNERS Kennedy Guardian No. K -810 Z INTERCEPTOR - D Valve Box j Q Kennedy Guardian No. K -810 p Mueller Su interceptor (alternate dual sweep clean- outs). �3�,i $ Valve and Hydrant Tee OR IN THE R.D.w, ADJACENT I 1 per Centurion No. 25 (� CELL O 5. Contractor Shall assure 2,500 PS1 minimum so// bearin (No Substitutes) o GATE VALVE Mueller Super Centurion No. 25 TO SIDE LOT LIMES I iv Mechanical I American Darling @ -84 -B "' ' 1' U g DIRECTION de NUMBER OF TURNS w /D.I. Rotatable Mech. Joint O Mach. Joint L capacity bedding elevation. TO OPEN VALVE L-13 Gland on Plain End Branch. Volvo American Darling @ - @4-B WHEFEVER POSSIBLE. Joint Valva AVK °Nostalgle 2760 n PLAN III W .. _ - - NOTES. ATER WATER AVK- Nostalgic 278D 4. SEIEX 440. SHEET I OF 5 W FOR TYPICAL VALVE BOX SETTINGS.I W -- 5. SEE INDEX 402, SHEET 3 OF 5 INTERCEPTOR 2' PVC w/ PLUG TYPE OF SERVICE: CELL I. Concrete,• 4500ps! 0 26 day. Water Main der am FOR TYPICAL CONNECTIONS s FITTINGS � Q 2. Rabur: AS7M A615 Grade 60, _ (SEE NOTE °) WATER (POTABLE WATER) F- _ p. RADIANT RUN OHIO SHALL EA: ® (%) LENGTHS � LENGTH J. Mesh: ASTM A815 Grade 65. Water Main � •. • •• n MAXIMUM to FEET OR LESS I �- Restraining Joint (T W GRE -A.5'E INTERCEP TOR A Design; AC13 18 -83 Bullding Code A57M 0857 Minimum 3 BRASS IDENTIFICATION DISK FROY1 WATER MAIN g (Typ.) Z N U Structural Design Loading for Underground Mech. Joint valve GWER INSCRIBED WATER 7. ON HYDRANT MMOU73 GREATER THAN TYPL_CAL FIRE WYDRANT SETTING Z 750 - 1250 GALLON SECTION 144E g g g Restraining Joint TYPICAL HYDRANT SETTING - O 0 Precast Concrete Utility Structures ��_ 10 FEET FROM -ME MAN, INSTALL MECH. JOINT VALVE AT MATH AND AT HYDRANT. CRY INDEX N0, ILO?, 4 OF S Q 5. Loads: H�-20 truck wheels w/30X impact per AASHTO. 7, NO PVC RISERS ALLOWED TYPICAL VALVE & BbX SETTING PLAN VIEW ,�T•£ CITY INDEX NO. 307• Shoat 1 OF 1 6. F171 w/c %an water prior to start up of system. CITY INDEX NO. 4OZ; 1 OF 5 WATER VALVE BOX CITY INDEX N0. io? 3 of 5 N.T.S. 7 Croy water on /y, black water shall be carried by N.T.S. CONCRETE PAD PLAN VIEW N.T.S. - -- __ separate sewer. CITY INDEX No. 4e2; 2 OF S ® Q N.T.B. ONLY APPROVED < Fire Hydrant Assembly (Typ) Kennedy Guardian No. K -81D V=cl Z W Mueller Super Centurion No. 25 © X Ame rican Darling B -84 -B L Ebba Iron Megalug (Typ.) AVK- Nostalgic 2780 Distance Varies See Note 4 Z O ( ) ON ALL TEES, A MINIMUM OF 5` SHALL BE NOTE: 18" Min. RESTRAINED ON EACH RUN LEG Device must be installed level. O p 24' Max. Valve Box L = MINIMUM LENGTH TO BE Restraining Gasket (Typ.) L I (Thrust Restraint (Typ.) TOP VIEW () Z Valve Box (See Note 3) RESTRAINED ON EACH SIDE OF FITTING, (ft.)� / / (See Note 3) FIGURES BASED ON 30" BURY DEPTH, 150 PSI TEST PRESSURE.( Approved Backflow NOTES: 8" PVC MAXIMUM SIZE USED IN SYSTEM Ford Meter Flange Prevention Device (Flanged) 1. ALL FIRE HYDRANTS TO HAVE 5 1/4" VALVE SEAT. 2. SEE INDEX 407, SHEET 1 OF 1 Ebba Iron 1500 Series (Typ.) FOR JACK & BORE DETAILS. C_ 3. SEE INDEX 402, SHEET 1 OF 5 FOR VALVE BOX SETTINGS, 4. ON HYDRANT RUNOUTS GREATER Mechanical I I THAN 10 FEET FROM THE MAIN, Joint Valve N THE FOLLOWING JOINTS MUST BE RESTRAINED IN ALL APPLICATIONS: INSTALL MECH. JOINT VALVE AT 1 BEND - INLET AND OUTLET NOM. PIPE SIZE 111.25 wNr. - `A, "CAS TIGHT `�°'� raa a� cnL�R ro �>� L MATGW EX/SnNG -�I I-�°6° OR LARGER IMERCEPTOR CELL SIZING CHART A _ B C D E DEAD END_ 111.25122.501 45 1 90 2250 45 90 LENGTH IN FEET (L) 4" 2 4 9 21 28 46 GRADE A41NG Nh'ER£ I _ GGALL66W 6 12 29 47 65 8" 4 1 8 I 16 I 38 I 66 85 17 42 A 1' '; .�� s. .- Fiji t ;• - r` Ca4a/T BQ 1H ,DES "' QU%LET TO ...... -- vu 7 =0' 4=e' 7' -a" 4' -J' J =IY ?'-o'- 5�0, 7 -Z" 4 =T" 3 -1O' 1yu "U 9' °G' 5�G' 7 =2` 5 =7' 4 =10' -. _. 16' -roIr` 3000 PSI 2'x2'x8' Concrete Pad with 6x6 W.W.F. / Pavement (M /N) - Al NOTES: 1. Ex1E}ISIaN aN VALVE Bel( SFNLL BE SET 90 IS TO RESERVE 1/2 CIF TEE AUJUSTNFNr UNGIl1 FDR fUM{E USE. I .,,,.,,•,............... .,' ... ...... ....... ..' ...........,. Fire Hvd,..R Ac hlv A-a NOTES: 53 tr 97 6 1 13 1 26 63 O LU . - 1 1NSPEC77LW RANIIAyr ,,. " ,v ,a ur - - I _ _- --- - -._., 1. ON HYDRANTS REWIRING RUNOUT THE ' • J SEW£R GE•NE•RAL Nn7F.S• . ` 3. INSTALL 3' BRASS IDENTIFICATION DISK W CONCRETE. (TYP.) Q Max. 15' - Min. 4' � i- ,.- 1NLE _. _ ,�» -�•�- i , 4. INSTALL 2- PVC WITH PLUG FOR TRACER WIRE STORAGE, - LAST TWO JOINTS Must BE RESTRAINED ! -_. MA IN - .� -.-j. • ' 6. LOCATOR WIRE ACCESS - 2' (WHITE OR GRAY) SCHEDULE BO PVC, BRA`w5 FEMALE ADAPTOR COUPUNG AND 2' BRASS PLUG W/ RECESS NUT, (SEE DETAIL 403 SHEET 2 OF 2). 18' Mir'. _ ry F1•.. OUTLET �, _.„ 11 --�' 1• lire lnterC for system may Consist of multi le TERMINATE INSULATED, SOLID 12 GAUGE POPPER TRACER WIRE AT TOP W/ A MINIMUM 12' OF EXTRA PARE, 24" Max. @Oak of Curb INLET �LWENNGG�£- 1 ( 1 - + - - }' y p 2 -12G c 2 HYDRANT RUN OUTS SHALL BE Distance Varies or B 4 /nteravp tar ce / /s, If required grBp#er than 1250 gp//pn •. o Mach. Joint Valve MAXIMUM 10 FEET OR LESS - Ede of Pavement -\ w W U f I, ! - - �' i •. ~�•* -r• capacity. :. /'. ' Tracer wires Connecting Piece w /Integrally O - -(Sae Note 3) g W f FROM WATER MAW. 2. One sampling cell per system shall be installed at outfoll Corr a5tec1:,9ub�ra�e cast End-D.I. Joint Gland on NOTES Oq 0' PRECAST BAFFLE° 4' THICK `�- • --�+°' C SAMPLING - c w 3' BRASS IDEHTIFlCATKNI DISK One End -D.I. Rotatable Mech. 3. ON HYDRANT RUNWIS GREATER I. STEAMER CONNECTION T4 iJJ Q r I ii _ .• C �+ 4 CELL to mule, only if required. " 2» PVC < Joint Gland on Other End. THAN 10 FEET, INSTALL MECH. JOINT FACE STREET. I LL p' SAMPLING Concrete wall coating taking into consideration the , 2'x2' CONCRETE PAD - '� �� VALVE AT MAIN AND AT HYDRANT, J CELL PRECAST BAFFLE ('IF REQUIRED) 0 watery ail mix. See Note 1 (Sao Index M 402, 1O TYPE OF VALVE. Distance Varies 2. ALL FIRE HYDRANTS TO HAVE f < E SIZE OF VALVE See Note 1 5 1/C VALVE SEAT. Valve Box 1 = W (IF REQUIRED ' 4' n+lrar r 4, Contractor to supply & instal/ o// i in and sanitary Shoat 2 of 5) I BUTTERFLY, GATE OR PLUG - ( ) ONLY APPROVED ( % PPy piping Y �� o - ONLY APPROVED (See Note 4) #' 3 -Piece Adjustable N 3. FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE stor Boni 5oes tees Clean -outs for cleaning toward and away from f�; ¢" PLACED AT STREET CORNERS Kennedy Guardian No. K -810 Z INTERCEPTOR - D Valve Box j Q Kennedy Guardian No. K -810 p Mueller Su interceptor (alternate dual sweep clean- outs). �3�,i $ Valve and Hydrant Tee OR IN THE R.D.w, ADJACENT I 1 per Centurion No. 25 (� CELL O 5. Contractor Shall assure 2,500 PS1 minimum so// bearin (No Substitutes) o GATE VALVE Mueller Super Centurion No. 25 TO SIDE LOT LIMES I iv Mechanical I American Darling @ -84 -B "' ' 1' U g DIRECTION de NUMBER OF TURNS w /D.I. Rotatable Mech. Joint O Mach. Joint L capacity bedding elevation. TO OPEN VALVE L-13 Gland on Plain End Branch. Volvo American Darling @ - @4-B WHEFEVER POSSIBLE. Joint Valva AVK °Nostalgle 2760 n PLAN III W .. _ - - NOTES. ATER WATER AVK- Nostalgic 278D 4. SEIEX 440. SHEET I OF 5 W FOR TYPICAL VALVE BOX SETTINGS.I W -- 5. SEE INDEX 402, SHEET 3 OF 5 INTERCEPTOR 2' PVC w/ PLUG TYPE OF SERVICE: CELL I. Concrete,• 4500ps! 0 26 day. Water Main der am FOR TYPICAL CONNECTIONS s FITTINGS � Q 2. Rabur: AS7M A615 Grade 60, _ (SEE NOTE °) WATER (POTABLE WATER) F- _ p. RADIANT RUN OHIO SHALL EA: ® (%) LENGTHS � LENGTH J. Mesh: ASTM A815 Grade 65. Water Main � •. • •• n MAXIMUM to FEET OR LESS I �- Restraining Joint (T W GRE -A.5'E INTERCEP TOR A Design; AC13 18 -83 Bullding Code A57M 0857 Minimum 3 BRASS IDENTIFICATION DISK FROY1 WATER MAIN g (Typ.) Z N U Structural Design Loading for Underground Mech. Joint valve GWER INSCRIBED WATER 7. ON HYDRANT MMOU73 GREATER THAN TYPL_CAL FIRE WYDRANT SETTING Z 750 - 1250 GALLON SECTION 144E g g g Restraining Joint TYPICAL HYDRANT SETTING - O 0 Precast Concrete Utility Structures ��_ 10 FEET FROM -ME MAN, INSTALL MECH. JOINT VALVE AT MATH AND AT HYDRANT. CRY INDEX N0, ILO?, 4 OF S Q 5. Loads: H�-20 truck wheels w/30X impact per AASHTO. 7, NO PVC RISERS ALLOWED TYPICAL VALVE & BbX SETTING PLAN VIEW ,�T•£ CITY INDEX NO. 307• Shoat 1 OF 1 6. F171 w/c %an water prior to start up of system. CITY INDEX NO. 4OZ; 1 OF 5 WATER VALVE BOX CITY INDEX N0. io? 3 of 5 N.T.S. 7 Croy water on /y, black water shall be carried by N.T.S. CONCRETE PAD PLAN VIEW N.T.S. - -- __ separate sewer. CITY INDEX No. 4e2; 2 OF S ® Q N.T.B. ONLY APPROVED < Fire Hydrant Assembly (Typ) Kennedy Guardian No. K -81D V=cl Z W Mueller Super Centurion No. 25 © X Ame rican Darling B -84 -B L Ebba Iron Megalug (Typ.) AVK- Nostalgic 2780 Distance Varies See Note 4 Z O ( ) ON ALL TEES, A MINIMUM OF 5` SHALL BE NOTE: 18" Min. RESTRAINED ON EACH RUN LEG Device must be installed level. O p 24' Max. Valve Box L = MINIMUM LENGTH TO BE Restraining Gasket (Typ.) L I (Thrust Restraint (Typ.) TOP VIEW () Z Valve Box (See Note 3) RESTRAINED ON EACH SIDE OF FITTING, (ft.)� / / (See Note 3) FIGURES BASED ON 30" BURY DEPTH, 150 PSI TEST PRESSURE.( Approved Backflow NOTES: 8" PVC MAXIMUM SIZE USED IN SYSTEM Ford Meter Flange Prevention Device (Flanged) 1. ALL FIRE HYDRANTS TO HAVE 5 1/4" VALVE SEAT. 2. SEE INDEX 407, SHEET 1 OF 1 Ebba Iron 1500 Series (Typ.) FOR JACK & BORE DETAILS. C_ 3. SEE INDEX 402, SHEET 1 OF 5 FOR VALVE BOX SETTINGS, 4. ON HYDRANT RUNOUTS GREATER Mechanical I I THAN 10 FEET FROM THE MAIN, Joint Valve N THE FOLLOWING JOINTS MUST BE RESTRAINED IN ALL APPLICATIONS: INSTALL MECH. JOINT VALVE AT 1 BEND - INLET AND OUTLET NOM. PIPE SIZE 111.25 ELBOWS (deg.) VALVE TEES BRANCH DEAD END_ 111.25122.501 45 1 90 2250 45 90 LENGTH IN FEET (L) 4" 2 4 9 21 28 46 6" 3 6 12 29 47 65 8" 4 1 8 I 16 I 38 I 66 85 MAIN AND AT HYDRANT. 2. TEE - OUTLET BRANCH 5. HYDRANT RUNOUTS SHALL BE MAX. 3. OFFSETS - INLET AND OUTLET NOTE: 10 FEET OR LESS FROM WATER MAIN, 4. CAPS THRUST RESTRAINT AT FITTINGS AND VALVES SHALL BE MADE OF DUCTILE IRON PIPE. 5. PLUGS EBBA IRON MEGALUG RESTRAINERS. D•I,P• 6. DEAD ENDS THRUST RESTRAINT BETWEEN PIPE JOINTS SHALL BE Z7 - 7. HYDRANT RUNOUTS SHALL BE RESTRAINED AS DEAD ENDS EBBA IRON 1500 SERIES RESTRAINERS. ON ALL TEES A MINIMUM OF S' SHALL BE Of LLI % °• (f) - O (.i) RESTRAINED ON EACH RUN LEG. DO NOT USE FOR Ford Angle Flow L - MINIMUM LENGTH TO BE VERTICAL OFFSETS Valve ---� RESTRAINED ON EACH SIDE DF FITTING (R.) (Flanged) * CONTACT CONTACT ENI EER FOR VALUES HGURES BASED ON 30' BURY DEPTH, 150 PSI TEST PRESSURE Q r 0 FIGURES DON'T APPLY TO POLY WRAPPED PIPE ® Z Q I L(? THE FOLLOWING JOINTS MUST BE RESTRAINED IN ALL APPLICATIONS: CID PIPE SIZE ELBOWS (deg,) VIES BRANCH DEAD END 111.25122.501 45 1 90 - LENGTH IN FEET L 4 2 3 7 17 18 30 8 2 5 10 23 30 42 8 3 1 6 1 12 30 42 54-- 12' 4 8 17 42 it 76 16' -roIr` 5 1 10 1 22 53 tr 97 6 1 13 1 26 63 Yt 117 1. BEND - INLET AND OUTLET f I dr- ® ®® 4C �� GRATE WEIR ORIFICE Brass Nipple OUTFLOW PIPE O LAKE ELEV. 2. TEE - ALL BRANCHES -INLET AND OUTLET RISE IN CREST ELEV. Meter TOP BOTTOM DEPTH IN 512E IN o LD 0 4, CAPS 9.43 N/A (Flanged) N/A 4- =3/32' Q? N/A Z _ 18 5, PLUGS e. DEAD ENDS *APPROVED R.P. DEVICES Lu L *APPROVED DOUBLE -CHECK VALVES Q) a-+ 7. HYDRANT W RUNTS SHALL BE RESTRAINED AS DEAD SFAS Horse Beeco Model FRP II ro N Hersey -Beeco Model FDC 0 0 0 UJ NOTE: THRUST RESTRAINT ON DUCTILE R9t1 PIPE SHALL U.S. Watts Model 909 or 009 Conbruce 40200 o -p Watts Model 709 or 007 Cj Ld PPE FIELD Loa( G TS FOR FOR TY JOINT PIPE A A AMERICAN FASTILCRP •- In Conbraco 40100 O 4 GASKETS FOR AMERICAN FASITTE PPE, THRUST RESTRAINT ON DUCTILE APE E CJ 12" 00 RON FIT SHALL E PROM RCN FITTINGS SHALL T PROVIDED BY THE USE OF MEGALUG RETAINERS AND MECHANICAL JOINT FITTINGS, 2 C) 0- LLLL U _j Connecting Piece w /integrally Restraining Tapping Sleeve &Valve Exist. Water Main TI IP - THRUST RESTRAINING cast Mech. Joint Oland on Joint By City, Fee by CITY INDEX ND, 40% 2 of 2 \ / a) w one End-D.I. Rotatable Mech. (Typ.) Owner or Cantractar. PVC PIPE THRUST RESTRAINING N.T.S. TYPICAL METER SETS W/ °' U U- Joint Gland on Other End. - 0) o w TYPICAL FIRE HYDRANT SETTING CITY INDEX NO. 403; 1 OF 2 BACKFLOW PREVENTERS 1 ®1 /2" $C 2" MODELS o o f° N.T.S. CITY INDEX NO. 402: 5 OF 5 CITY INDEX NO. 405: 2 OF 5 N. T. S. N.T.S. 2 Feet Minimum I Flanged Tee 2 Feet _ eet Maximum Flanged Tea 9D' Brass Ell (Typ) 0 _- o 0 0 o a o -__ _. __-_ T��rN�e,,I Dt�� FLOW ••�°�� O --_ O O O UO a p ". e " o t 2 Feet ° Stop Less Check rapped Flange-�� Ball Valve 90' Brass Ell (TYP) �- Topped Flange Minimum �� Brass Ni les Minimum/ Ball Valve TYP MUELLER H14350 with Lock Win and Gate -Vaiva rnstglted Below Grade Tapped Flange Ball Valve PP Backflow Preventer Tapped Flange ( ) 9 (Sae Note 4) Brass Nipples 2" Backflow (Typ.) / 2 Feet Maximum 2 Feet Minimum Compression inlet or approved equal Boll Valve (Typ_) Preventer Ball Valve Gate Valve Installed Below Grade ! Gate Valve Installed By Owner Gate Valve Installed By Owner (See Note 4) 90' Brass Ell--- 90' Brass Ell TOP VIEW 90' Brass EII �! Flow * APPROVED R.P. DEVICES BYPASS DETAIL 90' Brass Ell * APPROVED DOUBLE -CHECK VALVES * APPROVED R.P. DEVICES BYPASS DETAIL * APPROVED DOUBLE -CHECK VALVES Water Meter Connection - - Herse -Beeco Model 6CM Bypass Not Shown In Profile Herse --Beeco Model No. 2 , Threaded Corporation Stop Horse -Beeco Model 6CM B ass Not Shown In Profile Hersey -Beeco Model No. 2 y y Ball Valve Installed Below Grade Approved Backflow Ball Valve Installed By Owner p Y YP Ames 5000 SS Ames 2000 SS Prevention Device MUELLER H15008 Ames 5000 SS Ames 2000 SS Resilient Seat Watts Model 909 or 009 Watts Model 709 Or 007 Flan Watts Model 909 or 009 Approved Backflow Watts Model 709 or 007 Approved * ( (Flanged) or approved equal OS & Y Valve (Typ•) PP Conbraco 40200 Conbraco 40100 Conbroco 40200 Preventer * Conbraco 40104 Backflow NOIE. ;. Flanged Tee Resilient Seat _- (Tap at 45' angle} 9 OS & Y Valve Prev nter Resilient Seat PARALLEL DEVICE /NSTALLAAON IS e ° ,�:•:;' Plate Strainer Flanged Tee OS & Y Valve EMPLOYED KHENEVER /T IS NTAL o 0 0 Flanged 9U' Bend 9 Flanged Tee �`'� Plate Strainer TO MAINTAIN A CON77NUOUS Flanged 90' Bend , 9 O Flanged Tee SUPPLY OF WATER AND WHERE o ° ° 90' Bross Ell (TYP) g Flanged 45 Bend � l/ Saddle required wired on Flanged 45' Bend IN45RRUP77ONS FOR 7ES77NG AND -- I LLi /- Uniflange o o Meter ° e 0 0 0 SERNC/NG WOULD BE 4 P.V.C. only EZ UNACCEPTABLE, DEVICE MUST BE g D Water Service Tubing :� ° UniflUnge a Support INSTALLED LEVEL. Ford Meter Flange (TYP) r Support 12" Support LL• Gate Valve Installed 8 Owner Gate Valve Installed Below Grade a Su " a Gate Valve Installed By Owner 90' Brass Ell (TYP) Iron service Saddle x Driscopipe 5100 r Endot /Yardley Uj 1(/j 'I Gate Volvo Installed Below Grade Y pport Support �•y (See Note 4) - -• - -. (See Note 4) ,� q�Q 12 A. o - Ford FC 202 :series � � Blue Jet, SDR 9,03408 Polyethylene � � tar nles steel b nd G / off• oe I w /star S e o W 2 Feet Minimum ,- Megalug Restrainer Megalug Restrainer• _', 2 Feet Maximum • ' � • ' 9D' Brass Ell (Typ)•�� or approved equal / `. �/ � W < NOTE: M.J, 90' Bend 2 Feet NOTE: 2 Feet Me LL LL - i. 0 S & Y VALVE HANDLES WILL BE CHAINED AND LOCKED' N.: Minimum Me olu Restrainer 1. 0 S & Y VALVE HANDLES WILL BE CHAINED AND LOCKED. Minimum m (Flanged y Brass Nipple 0 LLI I- Flow �7}S% 9 9 Megalug Restrainer 2. METER SETS WILL BE PAINTED AFTER INSTALLATION. W- >�- IUIIY}S `i 2. METER SETS WILL BE PAINTED AFTER INSTALLATION. 9 9 4 3. BYPASS PIPE &FITTINGS SHALL BE THREADED BRASS, Ball Valve Installed Below Grade � Brass Nipple III I ® � ,� � uJ 3. BYPASS PIPE &FITTINGS SHALL BE THREADED BRASS. -'-- -_ M,J. 45' Bend F0 Water Main M. J. 90' Bend\ 4. GATE VALVE SHALL BE SET AT WATER MAIN, FOR ALL WATER METER 4. GATE VALVE SHALL BE SET AT WATER MAIN. FOR ALL WATER METER o Boll Valve Installed By Owner Gate Valve of Water Main M.J. 45' Bend 12" min above r r3 N SETS OVER 10 FEET FROM WATER MAIN, GATE VALVES SHALL BE SETS OVER 10 FEET FROM WATER MAIN, GATE VALVES SHALL BE g ound " Co Gate Valve at Water Main INSTALLED AT THE WATER MAIN AND THE WATER METER SET. (See Note 4) INSTALLED AT THE WATER MAIN AND THE WATER METER SET. CV Q (See Note 4) c V�z C TYPICAL COMPOUND WATER METER SET TYPICAL COMPOUND WATER METER SET I Fly I CHLORINATION TAP m PARALLEL METER SET - d' 31 " }} " 1> CITY INDEX NO. 408; 1 OF 2 2 900 R i S E � �- cgC 6 MODELS �•5 " RISE 3", 4 , c�C 6 MODELS 2 Feet Maximum 9D' Ell (Typ) CITY INDEX N0.405: 5 OF 5 2 Feet Minimum I .� � U CITY INDEX NO. 405; 3 OF 5 CITY INDEX NO. 405; 4 OF 5 N.T.S. N.T.S N.T.S. Z < W N.T.S. - - - Lo WRAP FILTER MEDIA AND STONE Uj 00 WITH LINER ADD FDOT NO. 56 STONE BETWEEN GROUND SURFACES TO THE TOP LIMITS OF THE UNDERDRAIN REMAIN UNOBSTRUCTED AND THE POND BOTTOM. >( UNDERDRAIN AREA SHALL IMPERMEABLE LINER y BE MAINTAINED CLEAR OF VEGETATION MCF 12/12 30 mil OR EQUVALENT 2' Ball Valve POND BOTTOM EL = 4.5 Hose Bibb 3/4' Galvanized! 1.5' (NO SOD) ;; FDOT No. 56 STONE f 2' Galvanized *' - -_ -- - APPROVED EQUAL) (RIVER ROCK OR PPRO AL �2" 90' Ell / 7 3" MIN. }: 6" PERFORATED ' PVC PIPE WITH DRAIN GUARD NOTES: 1. GRATE: U.S. FOUNDRY & MFG. CORP. 2' Corporation. 6 "(MIN.) 6" (MIN.) NO. 6212 OR EQUAL. 0 FDOT No. 56 STONE 2, PROVIDE 2' x 2' x 4" CONC. SLAB BELOW ORIFICE ORIFICE Tapping Saddle 2� (RIVER ROCK DR LOCATION. SLAB TO BE PLACED AFTER INSTALLATION �= Rastrained 2 "lapped Plug i APPROVED EQUAL) INV EL 3.50 �- -- �i SEE SITE PLAN OF CONTROL STRUCTURE, A OD TEMPORARY BLOWOFF O 6" LU AND SAMPLE TAP '.: Al A I END CONNECTION CITY INDEX NO. 408: 2 OF 2 TOP CONNECTION us M It N.T.S. -. O Ill tlQI _ us PLACE MIRAr'1 140N DRAINAGE IMPERMEABLE LINER ca z cc f7 FABRIC BETWEEN FILTER MATERIAL MCF 12/12 30 mfl OR EQUIVALENT FILTER MATERIAL TAMCO 20/30 SILICA OR EQUIVALENT ac 0 lily -2 FILTER MEDIA AND STONE WITH UNIFORMITY COEFFICIENT OF 1.5 OR GREATER & � EFFECTIVE GRAIN SIZE OF 0.20 TO 0.55 mm DIAMETER z cc POND UNDERDRAIN DETAIL .E^ N,T.S• (hp- 0 2� T P OF STRUCTURE �� ■ a� I PLAN �X N.T.S. O Z W ° 19.00 GRATE s W i I I GRATE � Z -t L11 rn ALUMINUM CLAMP (/� I f/�' AND ATTACHMENTS. u I � f I _ PIPE SHALL BE MOUNTED TOP OF TO C:) � TO STRUCTURE USING AN ALUMINUM CLAMP AND---,, 3/e "0 STAINLESS r3 "Q• P.V.C. PIPE STEEL BOLTS I I I f I I EL 5.44 ` I L--- - - - - -- - I L_-- -- - --- I 3.00 11.00 EL 5.00 ORIFICE e' CAP DRILLED TO SPECIFIED =-0 -! - rr I P feet ORIFICE DIAMETER RCP r.I c� - GROUND � � J - 6(If1. II :1 AC- STRUGT, f I dr- ® ®® 4C �� GRATE WEIR ORIFICE SKIMMER OUTFLOW PIPE NO. LAKE ELEV. WIDTH IN RISE IN CREST ELEV. DIM. IN TOP BOTTOM DEPTH IN 512E IN INVERT 1 VAULT 9.43 N/A N/A N/A 4- =3/32' N/A N/A N/A _ 18 4.20 R rr W I d IL H /. L1 O SUMP (AS NECESSARY) 0 1 Track �.00 ORIFICE DETAIL 3' WIDE 3' LONG - i7, - -- - -- � - - - - - -- �-- z�� - - -� Lock to Lock Time :6.00 N.T.S. �ECT�Ci� A -A �a';Y, HQ)_ 4 Steering Angle 31.5 SECTION B -B N. T. S. �-' � I -i --, N.T.S. F.D.0,T. INDEX 232 TRIPE D "MODIFIED" ALL 01 OUTFALL STRICTURE #2 S ALL FtIGhjTS RESERVED H Landon, Maree & Assor;iatos, Inc. THIRD FLOOR "DEAD END" TURNING TEMPLATES E Anyone copying this document in any manner without the expressed consent of LANDON, MORES & ASSOCIATE., INC. SCALE: 1" _ 20' E shall be prosecuted to the full extent of the low. n h°� DO NOT COPY OR REPRODUCE T OF V f I dr- ® ®® 4C �� NONE�v R rr W I d IL H /. L1 O SUMP (AS NECESSARY) 0 1 Track �.00 ORIFICE DETAIL 3' WIDE 3' LONG - i7, - -- - -- � - - - - - -- �-- z�� - - -� Lock to Lock Time :6.00 N.T.S. �ECT�Ci� A -A �a';Y, HQ)_ 4 Steering Angle 31.5 SECTION B -B N. T. S. �-' � I -i --, N.T.S. F.D.0,T. INDEX 232 TRIPE D "MODIFIED" ALL 01 OUTFALL STRICTURE #2 S ALL FtIGhjTS RESERVED H Landon, Maree & Assor;iatos, Inc. THIRD FLOOR "DEAD END" TURNING TEMPLATES E Anyone copying this document in any manner without the expressed consent of LANDON, MORES & ASSOCIATE., INC. SCALE: 1" _ 20' E shall be prosecuted to the full extent of the low. n h°� DO NOT COPY OR REPRODUCE T OF V dr- ® ®® 4C �� NONE�v ■ ®�_ �o ® a ORIFICE I� o CEMENT GROUTb ' - R rr W I d IL H /. L1 O SUMP (AS NECESSARY) 0 1 Track �.00 ORIFICE DETAIL 3' WIDE 3' LONG - i7, - -- - -- � - - - - - -- �-- z�� - - -� Lock to Lock Time :6.00 N.T.S. �ECT�Ci� A -A �a';Y, HQ)_ 4 Steering Angle 31.5 SECTION B -B N. T. S. �-' � I -i --, N.T.S. F.D.0,T. INDEX 232 TRIPE D "MODIFIED" ALL 01 OUTFALL STRICTURE #2 S ALL FtIGhjTS RESERVED H Landon, Maree & Assor;iatos, Inc. THIRD FLOOR "DEAD END" TURNING TEMPLATES E Anyone copying this document in any manner without the expressed consent of LANDON, MORES & ASSOCIATE., INC. SCALE: 1" _ 20' E shall be prosecuted to the full extent of the low. n h°� DO NOT COPY OR REPRODUCE T OF V 7; a' Co to w+ ' 0 U'. a v 7, tU m 0, C0 U 0 rrl... C0 QT 0 a- E ' f I I i I�U LI 20' SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLE II AT PROPERTY CORNER CITY OF CLEARWATER GENERAL LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS 17wf. Indian Hawthorn IcoLUNn Simpson's Stopper) ► , (I�) Sabal Palm E I Ex. Palm Typ. (I3) INTERNAL LANDSCAPE VUA REQUIREMENTS L " I� I BEGIN 6' HIGH WALL ' L PVCF INTERNAL LANDSCAPE VUA AREA REQUIRED: 10% OF VUA PARKING AREA � - - - - - -- VUA AREA: 0 SF - PARKING GARAGE WITHIN BUILDING REQUIRED VUA LANDSCAPE AREA: 0 SF 10% X 0 SF ( ) II PROVIDED VUA LANDSCAPE AREA: 0 SF (0 %) Ornamental Peanut I (56o) 1 TREE REQUIRED PER 150 SF OF REQUIRED INTERNAL LANDSCAPE VUA2o' SIGHT VISIBILITY AREA: TRIANGLE III Em. Gd, Liriope (142)11 Wide :Fire Dept. 6tGGes5 0 / 150 = 0 TREES REQUIRED TREES PROVIDED FOR INTERNAL LANDSCAPE VUA AREA: 0 TREES -? ,h a I' Ornardental Peanut {' SHRUBS ARE REQUIRED FOR 50% OF THE REQUIRED INTERNAL ' - -Sabal Palm LANDSCAPE VUA AREA, WITH REMAINING AREA COVERED BY GROUND E Dwf. Indian Hawthorn COVERS, NOT INCLUDING SOD. O ° .333_......._......, .. RE Em,; Gd. Llrlo e I I E (g) EXISTING TREE RE=PLACEMENT REQUIREMENTS (102) I ° ° PROPOSED HOTEL SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR �1 ° ° EXISTING TREES RATED 3 4 AND 5 PER CONDITION RATING SUMMARY -- - EXIST , Af�DITIONAL FLOOR LEVELS) : ARE TO BE REPLACED AT 1 OF REPLACEMENT FOR 1 OF EXISTING Ex. Psalm - Typ. -�- Sea gape TREE REMOVED AND PALMS ARE TO BE REPLACED AT 1 " PER PALM 5 ore Juniper___1_ (33) TREE. TREES RATED 1 AND 2 PER CONDITION RATING SUMMARY DO NOT Hibiscus REQUIRE REPLACEMENT. + + (I q) Ornarinental ; Feonut Simpson's Stopper Pink Muh l irio e (�� QUALIFYING TREES REMOVED: 0 TREES C 0" REQUIRED REPLACEMENT I I' + + Fawf. Fire Bush w I + 5i I er, Trvm et— I (10) QUALIFYING PALMS REMOVED: 12 PALMS 12" REQUIRED REPLACEMENT p(3) Ili ++ Pineapple Guava Tree Blnd Jf Paradise TOTAL REPLACEMENT REQUIRED: 12" REQUIRED REPLACEMENT Pink Muhl _�{I + + + Fakahatchee Grass (10) - 13" TOTAL -� ! (457; r + + i + : (43) TOTAL REPLACEMENT PROVIDED. Indian Date Palm - Bird Of Poradise (13" ACCENT TREES 1" CALIPER LARGER THAN REQUIRED) _< (1) I } ; + (22) ° - I III ++ + + Washington Palm —_ Goontie ++ W E 1 1 II * . (3) .; (ISM REQUIRED PERIMETER LANDSCAPE BUFFERS �n I E Hibiscus �� o I D r - t + + + wf. Fire Bush NORTH BUFFER (ATTACHED DWELLINGS AND LIKE USES) c? (2�1 + + REQUIRED. 10 WIDE BUFFER WITH 1 TREE PER 35 LF & 100% Dwf. Indian Hawthorn + CONTINUOUS HEDGE ,301.91 LF / 35 = 8.6 = 9 TREES REQUIRED Err41. Gd. Lirlop e . P5 d )G Liri opt PROVIDED: 10 WIDE BUFFER, 13 PALM TREES + 3 EXISTING PALMS ,Dwf. Indian Ha torn 100% CONTINUOUS HEDGE + GROUNDCOVERS `� 12:1 RAiViP / f E(21) (2) f SOUTH BUFFER (STREET FRONTAGE) WIDTH PER OLD FLORIDA, BEACH BY + + + + DNf. Fire Bush Plheappe Guaval roe + , DESIGN I (3) "� gBlyd OF Paradise REQUIRED: 10' WIDE BUFFER WITH 1 TREE PER 35 LF & 100% CONTINUOUS HEDGE 328.65 LF / 35 = 9.4 = 9 TREES REQUIRED r : PROVIDED: 10' WIDE BUFFER 9 PHOENIX PALMS (SHADE TREE) & 100% I I f f Indian Dater'Palm CONTINUOUS HEDGE + ADDITIONAL SHRUBS & GROUNDCOVERS .._ Qwf. Flr�`._Bus�i f EAST BUFFER (STREET FRONTAGE) WIDTH PER OLD FLORIDA, BEACH BY I I' f SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLE i Fin Muhl u >. DESIGN II ✓ ((26) y REQUIRED: 10' WIDE BUFFER WITH 1 TREE PER 35 LF & 100% I I ° ,� Shc�re'.luniper ( Paradise GE ( ) Bird f, CONTINUOUS HEDGE 26)... — 3 ` .y `� -• -... ,y......... ......Em. Gd. Lirio e 113.80 LF / 35 = 3.3 - 3 TREES REQUIRED ��` �` Em. p PROVIDED: 10' WIDE BUFFER, 1 PHOENIX PALM SHADE TREE + 2 PALM ( SHADE y Ornamental Peanut ACCENT TREES 8c 100% CONTINUOUS HEDGE + ADDITIONAL SHRUBS &_- GROUNDCOVERS • -:;.. } WEST BUFFER (STREET FRONTAGE) WIDTH PER OLD FLORIDA, BEACH BY DESIGN rt REQUIRED: 10' WIDE BUFFER WITH 1 TREE PER 35 LF & 100% CONTINUOUS HEDGE r \ 193.87 LF / 35 = 5.5 = 6 TREES REQUIRED I PROVIDED: 10' WIDE BUFFER, 2 PHOENIX PALMS (SHADE TREE) + 4 PALM TREES + 5 EX. PALMS + 1 ACCENT TREE & 100% CONTINUOUS HEDGE + ADDITIONAL SHRUBS & GROUNDCOVERS 1 BUILDING FOUNDATION LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS FOUNDATION PLANTINGS TO BE PROVIDED FOR 100% OF BUILDING FACADE ALONG STREET RIGHT OF WAY, EXCLUDING AREAS FOR BUILDING INGRESS AND EGRESS, MINIMUM 5' WIDE WITH 2 ACCENT TREES OR 3 PALMS FOR EVERY 40 LF AND 1 SHRUB FOR EVERY 20 SF OF REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREA. 50% OF LANDSCAPE AREA TO BE SHRUB`} WITH REMAINING AREA TO BE GROUND COVERS REQUIRED: 448.67 LF BUILDING FACADE / 40 = 11.2 11 X 2 ACCENT TREES = 22 ACCENT TREES REQUIRED (OR 33 PALMS) 448.67 X 5' = 2,243.35 SF REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREA 2,243.35 / 20 = 112.2 = 112 SHRUBS REQUIRED PROVIDED: 12,33 TREES = 10 ACCENT TREES + 20 PALMS + 2 EX. PALMS, 150 SHRUBS AND 2,500 SF OF LANDSCAPE AREA WITH REMAINING AREA HAVING ADDITIONAL SHRUBS & GROUND COVERS I ;> U t ;1 I I 20 SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLE i I AT PROPERTY CORNER Z IEND 6' HIGH WALL I 'I w LLI II _ . o.s5' WALL I�AI J `i, D , Indian Hawthorn ' I� — ° PVCF COLU �' PVCF o I r w 1 ='inea le Guava :Tree pp Washington Palm " [� € Ornamental PP,an�� r` 'WALL 2 Simpson's 5tootoor) ? I I (33) 0.22'N. (22 + Hibiscus + 5IN/or TrumpeU,` Simpson's Stopper Washington P GU5 Im (1us (24) (2) ea G a e + Shore Muni e ` "i. Fakahatchee Grass (3) Pink Muhl + + `, (36) p I I Pink Mutely (22) Washington P 2) (28yj + .I I (21) Sea gape + + ` Indian D6te P 6 Pineapple Gua a Tre ; •...:. -:; 3 At I MI a�� X1 — 'msss �� a 1W 31 '7'P3i tt � 1 t wAj'Pi •'�n �3��Ji Nhite Marble .0 c . Pineapple, i I IGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLE Ornamental F-. PLANT SCHEDULE U Co Co d CL QED Ca (� lot 0 C) lt7 c Z IL CQ (n �2 0 o,5 u? Lt_ Q CD °aL o c° z L 0 �, o z � w U) 0 m c� The rninimurn c3rade for all plant material shall be Florida No. I or better, gas per the cjorerca I plant material ap a I ity standards per Notes 21�-55, Sheet LA-2. TREES BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT CAL SIZE + : Birr� �Of Paradjsl► Feijoa sellowiana Pineapple Guava Tree — 3 "Cal 8' -10' Ht., 3' -4' Sp. 1 12 . _. , ° — 14' Clear Trunk, Matched ; << ,e 20 Sabal palmetto Sabal Palm w „ 14' -16' CT, Varied + 11 I Tabebuia caroiba Silver Trumpet — + II 5abal Palml.l Washingtonia robusta Washington Palm — 16' CT, Matched (2) SHRUBS BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT Ornamental Pe r1lut SPACING 15 Carissa macrocarpo 'Boxwood Beauty' Beauty Natal Plum 3 gal., 20 "x20" 3' 0 °A 9 „, �� ,�... I, 88 WALL Sea Grape 3 gal., 20 "x20" �... FND N &D "PETERSON' 1.03'N. „_ Dwf. Fire Bush r.. L -- .......... . 0 08'N. 4 3TW ..... _................. .. 3' —� _ , .. 3 gal., 20 "x20 "' Shore Jurilper 128 Muhlenbergia capillaris 3 gal., 20 "x20" :} t ..... 3' 157 Myrcianthes fragrans Simpson's Stopper 3 gal,, 20 "x20" DiNf. Fire Bush 175 `• �� Dwf. Indian Hawthorn 3 gal., 14 "x14" 2.50' 79 Strelitzia reginae Bird Of Paradise 3 gal., 20 "x20" 3' 65 Indian Date Palm Bird of //( ;. .. ..... (paradise I ;,, LOWEST FLOOR ELEV. = 5.60' GROUND COVERS BOTANICAL NAME .......,._ (�) l 11 SPACING 985 ' Ex. Palm 18" Beauty Natal Plum Hibiscus i 12 "x18 ", 1 gal. ............ (15) (I I) Liriope muscari 'Emerald Goddess' Em. Gd. Liriope 12 "x18 ", 1 gal. 5�Iver Trumpet ........... ............. .......... Zamia pumila Coontie 14" x 14 ", 1 gal, 24" PLANT SCHEDULE U Co Co d CL QED Ca (� lot 0 C) lt7 c Z IL CQ (n �2 0 o,5 u? Lt_ Q CD °aL o c° z L 0 �, o z � w U) 0 m c� The rninimurn c3rade for all plant material shall be Florida No. I or better, gas per the cjorerca I plant material ap a I ity standards per Notes 21�-55, Sheet LA-2. TREES BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT CAL SIZE n 7 Feijoa sellowiana Pineapple Guava Tree — 3 "Cal 8' -10' Ht., 3' -4' Sp. 1 12 Phoenix sylvestris Indian Date Palm — 14' Clear Trunk, Matched LANDSCAF)IT ARCHITECT 20 Sabal palmetto Sabal Palm — 14' -16' CT, Varied U) 6 Tabebuia caroiba Silver Trumpet — 3 "Cal 8' -10' Ht., 3' -4' Sp. 17 Washingtonia robusta Washington Palm — 16' CT, Matched SHRUBS BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT SPACING 15 Carissa macrocarpo 'Boxwood Beauty' Beauty Natal Plum 3 gal., 20 "x20" 3' 88 Coccoloba uvifera Sea Grape 3 gal., 20 "x20" 3' 77 Hamelia patens `compacta' Dwf. Fire Bush 3 gal., 20 "x20" IL 3' 89 Hibiscus Species Hibiscus 3 gal., 20 "x20 "' 3' 128 Muhlenbergia capillaris Pink Muhly 3 gal., 20 "x20" 3' 157 Myrcianthes fragrans Simpson's Stopper 3 gal,, 20 "x20" 4' 175 Rhaphiolepis indica 'Alba' Dwf. Indian Hawthorn 3 gal., 14 "x14" 2.50' 79 Strelitzia reginae Bird Of Paradise 3 gal., 20 "x20" 3' 65 Tripsacum dactyloides Fakahatchee Grass 3 gal., 20 "x20" 3' GROUND COVERS BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT SPACING 985 Arachis glabrata 'Arblick' Ornamental Peanut 12 "x18 ", 1 gal. 18" 343 Juniperus conferta Shore Juniper 12 "x18 ", 1 gal. 24" 639 Liriope muscari 'Emerald Goddess' Em. Gd. Liriope 12 "x18 ", 1 gal. 18" 60 Zamia pumila Coontie 14" x 14 ", 1 gal, 24" 0 20 40 60 feet NORTH�� SCALE: 1" a 20' I" N O O W C7 CV < U J iu CU C 0 0 U) av o 3: C: LO •E U7 (D o U) co CC -0 Er a @J F o 0 ~ L6 LU N CO � N d° � o Q � N U 0 r, � J � L co C C (U 0 F o n V) E 41 e V1 C E � J' 2013' CONSTRUCTION PLANS 1 ARE NOT VALID UNLESS PATRICK,,,Q,�RQBERSON SIGNED & EMBOSSED FLORIDA'' EGIS rERED WITH LANDSCAPE LANDSCAF)IT ARCHITECT ARCHITECT'S SEAL N0. LcAQQQ,461,. -° � o CU ,o <1 <1 I" N O O W C7 CV < U J iu CU C 0 0 U) av o 3: C: LO •E U7 (D o U) co CC -0 Er a @J F o 0 ~ L6 LU N CO � N d° � o Q � N U 0 r, � J � L co U N a 0 _ rN C C (U 0 M o Q V) E cz 0 V1 C E CCU 0 va a Q> 4 C7 � Q C7 C) m Cz w o CJ ¢ � o CU ,o <1 <1 U) cv LU ® L F= � L0 C) O 4. 2 IL CL U N a 0 _ rN C C (U 0 � o Q V) E cz 0 V1 C E 0 0 0 Q> 4 C7 � Q C7 Q) � m Qa � w o CJ O � o CU ,o <1 <1 U N a 0 _ rN C C (U 0 w M pJ 0 Ll. CD 0 cz 0 U PLAU Project No. 13 -001 Date 01/31/13 Sheet LA1 Copyright — Urawings and concepts may not be used, constructed or reproduced without written permission from I-�olDerson Kesource croup, LLU ri 0) ;! 1: (0 0 cl� 6 CD 0 d �. 0 x W r_ W LLl . (v CLl 0 U . C� ..... v 0 0 0- LANpSCAPE GENERAL NOTES 1. Permits required by any authority or governing jurisdiction, for any installation or construction work described in the contract documents, shall be obtained by the Contractor. Any applicable fees or financial requirements are to be paid by the Contractor for such permits, unless stipulated specifically in writing by the Owner. 2. The Contractor shall comply with all codes, safety requirements, and environmental regulations of federal, state, local and other regulatory agencies that have jurisdiction over the project, without additional cost to the owner. This includes any safety standards of the Occupational Safety and Health Act and amendments. The Owner and Owner's Representative shall be held harmless from any accident, injury or any other incident resulting from compliance or non - compliance with these standards. 3. The work included in this Section include the furnishing of all materials, equipment and labor necessary and incidental to the installation and preparation of planting areas, soil treatment, plants, grossing, protection of existing and proposed plants, hauling and spreading of topsoil, finish grading, removal grid / or transplanting of existing plants as indicated, warranty, replacement of plants and / or moterials, and related items as required to P complete the work as indicated on the tans and fulfilling all warranty provisions, as specified herein. 4. The work shall also include the maintenance of all landscape plants and materials, planting areas, and sod / seeded areas until the Final Acceptance by the Owner's Representative. This time period of required maintenance may be extended through the full warranty period, as specified in the contract agreement, until Final Project Acceptance. 5. During construction, protect all existing trees, shrubs, and other specified vegetation, site features and improvements, r ovenents St ructures , installed elements and utilities specified herein and / or on submitted plans. Removal or destruction of items described above is prohibited unless specifically authorized by the Owner. 6. The plant list as shown on the plans is for the Contractor's information only and no guarantee is expressed or implied that quantities shown therein are correct or that the list is complete. The Contractor sholl verify that all plant rnaterial shown on the drawings are included in the Contractor's bid. 7. Substitutions of plant materials will not be permitted unless authorized in writing by the Owner's Representative. Proof is to be submitted in writing from 5 different regional sources that a plant specified is not obtainable. Consideration will be given to the nearest available size or similar variety with a corresponding adjustment of the contract price. 8. The Contractor shall review and verify the proposed and existing site elements, including but not limited to, storm drainage, water, sewer, phone, cable and electrical utilities, paving, site grading, buildings, walks, hardscape, and vegetation to preclude any misunderstanding and ensure a trouble free installation. 9. Stated dimensions shall govern over scaled dimensions on the plans. 10. Plants shall be subject to inspection for conformity to specification requirements and approval by the Owner's Representative at their place of growth, or upon delivery to the site, as determined by the Owner's Representative. Such approval shall not preclude the right of inspection and rejection during any phase of the work. Rejected plant materials shall be immediately removed from the project site grid replaced with approved plant materials within seven (7) days or as approved by the Owner's Representative. 11. All plants may be selected and 'tagged by the Owner's Representative at their place of growth. For distance material, photographs may be submitted for pre - inspection review and approval by the Owner's Representative. Pictures shall be clear and contain the full image of the plant material to be reviewed and have a clear indication of size in foot increments for trees and palms and inches for shrubs and groundcovers. The photograph will become the representative sample for that plant type (species and size). 12. Submit certificates of inspection, as required by governmental authorities, and manufacturers or vendors certified analysis for soil amendments, herbicides, insecticides and fertilizer materials and any additional data that indicates that the materials comply with specified requirements. 13, The Contractor shall conduct a minimum of three (3) soil tests at locations as shown on the plans or determined by the Owner's Representative, The Contractor shall test each location for soil composition (type, strata, pH, soluble salts, and organic content) and sub- surface drainage conditions (percolation rate), as a minimum. Soil testing shall be conducted by an approved soil - testing laboratory. The Contractor shall provide the Owner's Representative with the results of the soil analyses prior to any installations throughout the project. if soil conditions are insufficient for proper plant growth, the Contractor is required to supply recommendations for improving the condition of the soil of each area, to the Owner's Representative for approval. The Contractor shall, at the discretion of the Owner's Representative, proceed with the recommendations for improving the soil conditions. C 14. Trees designated as Ball and Burlap (B &B} shall be properly dug with firm natural balls of soil retaining as m sizes fibrous roots as possible is siz and shapes as specified in the most recent edition of the American Standard for Nursery Stock. Balls shall be firmly wrapped with nonsynthetic, rottable burlap and secured with heavy nonsynthetic, rottable twine. Root collar shall be apparent at the surface of the rootball. No trees with loose, broken, or manufactured rootballs will be planted, except with written approval of the Owner's Representative, prior to planting. 15, Sabal Palms shall have all frond removed prior to planting, leaving a minimum of twelve (12) inches of new frond growth above the bud, Boots shall be removed from the trunk of sobal palms unless otherwise specified by the Owner's Representative. Remove only a minimum number of fronds on other palm species to facilitate the handling of the palm material. Do not damage the buds of any palms and take necessary care to protect the bud during digging, handling, transportation and installation. c ' � I 16. During transportation of plant material, the Contractor shall exercise care to prevent injury and drying out of the trees. Should the coats be dried out, large branches broken, rootball damage, or areas of torn bark, the Owner's Representative may reject the injured plant material and require replacement of the rejected material at no additional cost to the Owner. 17, Plant material that is stored improperly shall receive a special review of acceptance or rejection, established on o case by Case basis. 18. The Contractor shall protect existing pavement, buildings, walks, curbing, walls, hardscape elements, utilities and planting materials (trees, shrubs, ground covers, etc.) which are not designated for removal on the plans from damage. 19. The Contractor shall request the proper utility company to stake the exact location of all underground lines including but not limited to electric, gas, cable and /or telephone service prior to layout and excavating of any planting area. The Contractor shall contact Sunshine State One -Call of Florida, Inc. (SSOCOF) at 1 -800 -432 -4770. Per SSOCOF, the calls shall be made a minimum of two days and a mo -&num of five days before beginning construction operations. 20. Not all utilities are members of the Sunshine State One -Call system and direct contact shall be taken as necessary. 21. The Contractor shall be responsible for the preservation and protection of all site conditions to remain from damage due to this work. In the event damage does occur, all damage shall be completely repaired to its original condition. All the costs of such work sholl be charged to and paid by the Cori tractor. 22, The Contractor shall thoroughly examine the project site, including sub - surface soil conditions, existing and proposed elevations and general conditions under which the work is to be preformed, The Contractor shall notify in writing of any conflicts or unsatisfactory conditions discovered, prior to beginning work. If the Contractor begins work before the unsatisfactory condition have been resolved, this will indicate that the Contractor has accepted the existing conditions and is responsible to complete the work at no additional cost to the Owner. 23, The Contractor shall be responsible for all unauthorized cutting or damage to existing trees not marked for removal on the plans. Such damage may be caused by operation of equipment, stockpiling of materials, careless labor, etc. This shall include compaction by driving or parking inside the drip -line of trees or the spillage of oil, gasoline, or other deleterious materials within the drip -line of trees. 24. The Contractor shall have a clear understanding and identify each existing tree, shrub and / or palm that is designated to remain or to be removed. 25. The Contractor shall maintain tree barricades at all times during the construction activities on the project for all existing trees, palms and other plant moterial within and adjacent to the limits of construction that are specified to remain. The Contractor shall refer to the tree protection detail and notes provided within the Landscape Plans. 26. 'The Contractor shall provide an International Society of Arboriculture (I,S.A.) Certified Arborist with a rninimum of five (5) years experience with similar projects, to direct appropriate pruning (roots, branches) and /or other treatment necessary to ensure the health, viability and attractiveness of trees and le for implementation of the Certified Arborist's instructions. palms to remain. The Contractor shall be responsible p 27. Uncover specified work when directed by the Owner's Representative without compensation. Should the material, workmanship, or method of installation not meet the standards specified herein, the Contractor shall replace the work at his own expense. 28. Rejected work shall be removed and corrected within severity -two (72) hours upon notification of rejection by the Owner's Representative. 29. Plants shall be true to species, variety and size as specified on the plans and nursery grown in accordance with good horticultural practices under climatic conditions similar to those in the locality of the project. 30. All plant material shall comply with all required inspections, grading standards and plant regulations, as set forth by the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services Division of Plant Industry, Grades and Standards far Nursery Plants, latest edition. All plant material shall also conform to ANSI Standards for Nursery Stock (ANSI Z60.1- 1990). 31. Plant materials not specifically covered in "Florida's Grade and Standards for Nursery Plants" shall conform to a minimum grade of Florida No. 1 as to: health and vitality, condition of foliage, root system, freedom from pests or mechanical damage; heavily branched and densely foliated according to the accepted normal shape; freedom from low and /or "V" shaped crotches. 32, The minimum grade for all plant material shall be Florida No. 1 or better. 33. Trees with a damaged or crooked leader, bark abrosions, sunscold, disfiguring knots, insect damage, or cuts of limbs over 3/4 inch in diameter that are not completely closed will be rejected. 34. Palms shall have straight trunks (within 3 degrees of vertical) unless other wise stated on the plans. Palms shall be free from burn marks and / or other damage to the trunk. 35. Balled end burlapped (B &B) plants (field grown trees and palms) shall be dug with firm, natural balls of soil of sufficient size to encompass the fibrous and feeding roots of the plants. No plants moved with a ball shall be planted if the ball is cracked or broken. B &B root balls shall exhibit small white fibrous roots coming through the burlap. Field grown trees and palm shall be nursery grown material. Root pruning and hardening off of plant material shall be done a minirnumm of six (6) weeks or for a period as determined by the Owner's Representative, prior to planting at the project. The supplier of the tree material shall supply certification of the date of root pruning and harvest date of the tree material, prior to the installation of the trees at the project site. 36, Protect roots or balls of plants at all Limes from sun and drying winds, excess water and freezing, as necessary lentil planting. 37. P Prepared lantirlg soil shall be fertile, friable natural topsoil of loarny character, without admixture of subsoil material, obtained from a well - drained arable site, reasonably free from clay, lumps, coarse sands, stones, plants, roots, sticks and other foreign materials. The acidity range shall be between P H 5,5 and 6.5. Prepared planting soil mixture shall consist of three (3) parts native topsoil meeting the above requirements and one (1) part peat. The peat shall be brawn to black in calmer, sterile, weed and seed free, granulated raw peat, containing not more than 9% mineral content on a dry basis. 38. Planting shall be coordinated with the underground automatic irrigation system(s) installation. The irrigation system is to supply 100 percent coverage of water to all required landscape plant material and turf at time of landscape installation. 39. The Contractor shall supply supplemental water; over the amount of water supplied by the irrigation system, for establishment to all newly installed trees and palms for ninety (90) days, commencing immediately after installation. Supplemental water can be supplied by water truck or direct water source on site (hose bib, reclaimed water, pump /well source), and shall be applied in such a manner to avoid disturbance to mulch and soil, and to avoid damage to plant materials. 40. It is the Contractor's responsibility to adjust watering amounts and frequency to ensure proper establishment of all plant material, 41, Fertilizer shall 'oe complete, uniform in composition, dry and free flowing. Fertilizer shall be delivered to the site in the original unopened containers, each bearing the rnianufacturer's statement of analysis. Store in a manner to prevent wetting and deterioration. 42, Mulch is to be 100% organic shredded Melaleuca, Pine bark or eucalyptus mulch (or type approved by the Owner) shall be utilized and installed to a wetted depth of three (3) inches. Mulch shall be free of extraneous sticks and other tree residue. 43, A pre - emergent herbicide (Rout, Ronstor or approved equal) shall be applied to all planting areas as specified by manufacturer's recommendations 44, Sod shall be as specified on the plans, in areas designated on the plans, Arid for disturbed areas within the construction limits, grass sod type shall be well matted with grass roots. The sod shall be taken up in rectangles, preferably 12" x 24 ", shall be a minimum of 2" in thickness, and shall be live, fresh, and uninjured at the time of planting. Sod shall be a minimum of 95% free from all noxious weeds, other grosses, and extraneous materials. The sod shall have a soil mat of sufficient thickness adhering to the roots to withstand all necessary handling. 45. The sod shall be planted as soon as possible after being dug, and kept moist and shaded until it is planted. Dumping from vehicles will riot be permitted and damaged sod will be, rejected. Replanting shall be performed within 24 hours after time of harvesting or sod shall be stacked in an approved manner and properly moistened until planted. Sod which has been cut for more than 72 hours shall not be used unless specifically authorized by the Owner's Representative, after inspection of the sad, 46, The work area may have existing utilities, such as, but not limited to, irrigation, phone, cable, electrical, water, sanitary sewer, and storm d on the Plans. However, n r ewer. The locations of some of these existing utilities may have been indicate s o guarantee is implied that the s 9 Y 9 P Plans are accurate or complete in reference to existing utility information. It shall be the responsibility of the Contractor to verify the location of all such utilities, structures, etc., by hand excavation or other appropriate measures before performing any work that could result in damage or injury to persons, utilities, structures or property. The Contractor shall make a thorough search of the site for utilities, structures, etc., before work is commenced in any particular location. 47, The Contractor Shall take immediate steps to re air , re lace , or restore all services to any utilities or other facilities whic h a r e disrupted tad P al outside repairs on a continuous basis until services are due the Contractors operations. The Contractor shall also engage any addition p restored. Contractor shall provide and operate any supplemental temporary services to maintain uninterrupted use of the facilities. All responsibility for damage due to negligence on the part of the Contractor shall be borne by the Contractor and the Contractor shall also be fully responsible for any and all claims resulting from the damage. 48, The Contractor shall notify the Owner's Representative, in writing, of soil conditions that the Contractor considers detrimental to the growth of plant material. These conditions are to be described, as well as suggestions for correcting them. Proper soil percolation must be assured at a minimum rate of 1/2" percolation per hour to a depth of a typical tree planting pit. 49. Planting areas are to be finished graded to conform to grades on engineering drawings or as rioted on the landscape drawings, after full settlement and installation has occurred. The Contractor shall correct or repair the grades as necessary to conform to the finished grades specified. All planting areas shall be free from concrete debris, lumps, depressions, rocks, sticks or other debris and shall be raked and grade( smooth to conform to the finish grades after the installation of landscape materials. The planting areas shall provide positive surface drainage without puddling of water. This requirement is applicable to sodded areas also. Sodded areas shall present a smooth and finished appearance, meeting finished grades as specified after instollation. 50. All materials and equipment shall be installed in a neat and workmanlike manner. The Owner's Representative reserves the right to direct the removal and replacement of any items, which, in his opinion, do not present an orderly and workmanlike appearance. Plant locations may also be adjusted by the Owner's Representative due to unforeseen on -site conditions. 51. Clean -up work and planting areas of rubbish or objectionable matter. Mortar, concrete and toxic material shall be removed from the surface of all plant beds. These materials shall riot be mixed with the soil. Should the Contractor find conditions beneath the soil, which will in any way adversely affect the plant growth, he shall immediately call it to the attention of the Owner's Representative, Failure to do so before planting shall make the corrective measures the responsibility of the Cantractor. 52, If underground construction, utilities or obstructions are encountered during the excavation of planting areas or pits, alternative locations for the plant material shall be selected by the Owner's Representative. Such changes in location shall be made by the Contractor without additional compensation. 53. All required trees and palms shall be placed a minimurn of four (4) feet from impervious surfaces; shrubs shall be placed a minimum of 18 inches as measured from the edge of the plant. 54. All shrub beds shall be considered as a single mulched area. There shall be no sod incorporated within such planted areas. All shrub and groundcovers shall be mulched curb -to -curb or edge of planting bed, unless otherwise indicated. Top of mulch shall be level with the top of curb or surrounding grade. 55. Sides of pits and trenches shall be vertical. When conditions detrimental to plant growth are encountered, such as rubble fill, adverse drainage conditions, and /or obstructions, the Owner's Representative shall be notified before planting. Sites with poor drainage may require the use of sloped sides , for pits or trenches. P 56. In planting areas where soils have been compacted to a density, which is detrimental to plant growth, loosen soils to allow root penetration beyond the planting pit. 57. Width of planting pit shall be 3 times the diameter of the rootball in highly compacted or poorly draining soils, with the sides of the pit sloped. 58. Shrubs fertilizer shall be Osmacote Time Released Fertilizer and composed of a fertilizer ratio of 3:1:1 or 3:1:2, (nitrogen: phosphorus: potassium) and contain all primary and secondary trace elements, or approved equal. 59, Sod fertilizer shall be composed of sixteen percent (16 %) nitrate nitrogen, four percent (4 %) phosphorus, eight percent (8 %) potassium and contain all primary and secondary trace elements for sodded areas, or approved equal. 60. Palms: Fertilizer sholl be composed of twelve percent (12%) nitrogen, four percent (4 %) phosphorus, twelve percent (12%) potassium and contain all primary and secondary trace elements for Florida palm trees. 61. Fertilizer shall be applied at the rates recommended by the manufacture and soil testing laboratory. Fertilizer shall be applied as a top dressing only and shall not be mixed in with the backfill material at time of installation, The Contractor shall apply fertilizers at the time of Management Practice Tree Fertilization, Installation. Fertilizer shall be applied per ANSI 300, Part 2 1998 and Best g s, and Shrub e tllrzation, ISA. 62. Trees, shrubs and ground cover shall be set straight and at such a level, that after settlement, the plant ball will stand flush, to 1" - 1/2" above grade. Each plant shall be set in the center of the planting pit.(see planting details). Planting goal shall be thoroughly "watered -in" to remove all air pockets around the root ball. Do not rely on the irrigation system to achieve this task. All burlap, rope wires, etc. shall be loosened from the top and sides of the ball, but no burlap shall be pulled from underneath. No more than two (2) inches of sail shall remain over the first major root closest to the soil surface. Remove non- biodegradable nursery wrappings and unwrap burlap from the top 1/3 of the rootball. 63. Plant materials such as trees, shrubs and groundcovers shall be planted prior to the planting of the grassed / sodded areas. The grossed / sodded areas shall be protected during and repaired if damaged during the planting installation activities. 64. All new furnished trees and palms shall be set plumb at the time they are installed to within a tolerance of three (3) degrees from vertical. Trees and palms found not to be vertically aligned will not be accepted, 65. A basin shall be built around all plants or trees that stand -alone and are riot located in larger mulched beds. A water - holding soil -dam shall be built on the outside edge of the planting pit to form a basin of sufficient volume to hold water, as per the Planting Details. 66. Each tree shall be pruned to preserve the natural character of the plant as shown on the Plans, All softwood (sucker growth) and all broken or badly damaged branches shall be ..r_emoved with a clean cut. Pruning procedures shall conform to ANSI A300 Part 1 - 2001 and Pruning and Best Management Practices, Tree Pruning, by the International Society of Arboriculture. All pruning shall be previously approved by the Owner's Representative. 67. Within one week after the planting, mulch material, as specified, shall be uniformly applied to a minimum wetted thickness of three (3) inches or as indicated on the Plans, over .the entire area of the backfilled hole or bed. The mulch shall be maintained continuously in place until the time of final inspection. 68. All trees riot within lantin beds shall be mulched within a three (3) foot diameter of the tree. P 9 69. Do not place mulch immediately against trunks of trees and palms. 70. Soft spots and inequalities in grade shall be corrected before starting sod work. Soil shall be watered before sod planting. Tomp or roll all newly installed sod. Sod shall be thoroughly watered in. 71. The setting of the sod pieces shall be staggered ,50 as to avoid a continuous seam_ The offsets of individual strips shall not exceed 6 ". In order to prevent erosion caused by.;v.erticol edges at the outer limits, the outer pieces of sod shall be tamped so as to produce a feathered edge effect, On steep slopes, the Contractor shall, if so directed, prevent the sod from sliding by means of wooden pegs driven through the sod blocks into.;fir•rri earth, at directed intervals. Sod shall be pieced in rows perpendicular to the slope. \ 72. The project site shall be kept in a.relativo h,b `c and clean appearance throughout the course of the landscape installation. Perform cleaning during installation of ;the work and upon completion of the work. Remove from the site all excess materials, soil, debris, and equipment. Repair domagg- ,resulting 'i�om planting and other landscape installation operations, '/, r 73. Provide one (1) year warranty covering the I4& "'6nd satisfactory condition of all planted materials. All sod shall be warranted for 90 days after Final Acceptance. The orie (1) yeas. warranty does not begin until the entire landscape installation has been accepted by the Owner's Representative at the time of Final. ;Acceptance for Landscape work. After the one (1) year warranty period, the Owner's Representative shall conduct the Projects }F'nal Inspection. Y 74. All plant material and turf not found' in a heoRhy growing condition, questionable survivability or dead at the end or at any time during the warranty period shall be removed from the site and replaced within ten (10) calendar days after written notice. r 75, All plant material replacements shall be of the some kind and size as specified in the Plant List, They shall be furnished, planted, mulched and watered -in as specified ak no additional cost to the Owner. These replacement materials shall be bound to the some warranty conditions as the original materials. 76. Damage to plant material from obvious vandalism, theft, Owner's neglect, or acts of providence (i.e., prolonged flooding, gale force winds, etc.), or incidents beyond the Contractor's control will not be covered under this warranty. 77. The Contractor shall notify the Owner's Representative in writing, a minimum of ten (10) days in advance, when all work is substantially complete to schedule a substantial completion. Based on this inspection, the Owner's Representative will develop a punch list of items to be addressed by the Contractor. Upon completion of Punch List items, the Contractor shall coordinate with the Owner's Representative to schedule a Final Acceptance Inspection. At the time of Final Acceptance, the warranty period shall begin. 78, Upon Final Acceptance of the plant material, the Contractor shall submit two (2) written maintenance instructions recommending procedures for the maintenance of plant materials and sod, for a one year period. EXISTING TREE PROTECTION GENERAI NOTES EXISTING TREES AND PALMS WITHIN AND ADJACENT TO THE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION AND SPECIFIED TO REMAIN ARE TO BE PROTECTED THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS WITH TREE BARRICADES PER THE CITY OF CLEARWATER REQUIREMENTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AN INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF ARB0RIS-f (ISA) CERTIFIED AR13ORIST WITH A MINIMUM OF 5 YEARS EXPERIENCE WITH SIMILAR PROJECTS, TO DIRECT APPROPRIATE PRUNING (ROOTS, BRANCHES) AND /OR OTHER TREATMENT NECESSARY TO ENSURE THE HEALTH, VIABILITY AND ATTRACTIVENESS OF TREES TO REMAIN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CERTIFIED ARBORIST'S INSTRUCTIONS. PRUNING SHALL CONFORM TO ANSI A -300 PRUNING STANDARDS. ALL TREE ROOTS EXISTING WITHIN IMPROVEMENT AREAS AND ORIGINATING FROM A PROTECTED TREE, SHALL BE SEVERED CLEAN AT THE LIMITS OF THE PRESERVED AREA WHERE INDICATED ON THE PLANS. ROOT PRUNING SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED BY MECHANICAL TRENCHER WITH SHARP BLADES AND UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION OF THE CERTIFIED ARBORIST. ROOT PRUNING SHALL MEET THE STANDARDS AND REQUIRE MEN rS OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER AND ISA, 116,1 WATER WELL: SET ROOTBALL CROWN m a 3" THICK 4' HIGH AT SHRUB, 1" HIGHER ROUNDING MULCH LAYER NO WATER WELL FINISHED GRADE. BUILDING/ CONTRACTOR SHALL AT LAWN AREA. STRUCTURE ,:, PROVIDE SOIL PROFILE I SLOPE FINISHED GRADE /' TO INSURE POSITIVE AT BACKFILL AWAY FROM { 5OR DRANAGE AWAY FROM ROOT @ALL, 6" CLEAR IN •�.•1 , SHO STRUGTURE. MULCH TO Y DEPTH SPECIFIED AREA ' , CURB, ASPHALT OR AT WATER WELL. ': :; PER 2114 _ , SIDEWALK MAINTAIN ...................... ................ TERMITE :: ! STRUCTURAL SOIL SUPPORT �� .::,:• ,... FINISHED GRADE. i \ �� :, INSPECTION FLA ;: OF ELEMENT UNIFIED :,.. ., / ' ......E . \ ...�, \. \::: , , ,i €..,,,,, CODE r \ \\ \� \\ \ \\ \\ CONTRACTOR SHALL I I t E r\ `` ., 3 i o i E \ \ �. \ \ ., - REMOVE ALL LOOSE J \ , ` T \ \ \' \\ \� \ \ \ \' \ I? CONSTRUCTION Iii, . /\ ROOTS ILL : , COMPACTED E \ \ \ ., MATERIALS, DEBRIS, m \ SUBGRADE TO a 3 � - \ CLAYS AND COMPACTED 0 . REMAIN FOR -,.1.1.1-,--t-, ....,:x, -, ; ;. SOIL TO 3 -0" DEEP _ ;: ::: :, : ... STRUCTURAL ::....,::; -- rr:. r :....::.:.:-i;..::.....:. :....: ;:.:.:. ;p.. iTi ::...i._ i E .. AND BACK FILL WITH BACKFILL MIX, SEE NOTES SUPPORT I t.:.:.' I I I. I l t 1 il, i3 3 w.l it t ;,M.r i'j____;EI f_::::1: f- : ;:.....3I;:.....: PLANTING SOIL MIX, _ AND SPECIFICATIONS. BUILDING .: 3 CONTRACTOR SYSTEM. RESPONSIBLE: FOR NATIVE SOIL LOCATION AND 2 X ROOTBALL FIRMLY COMPACTED. COMPACTED COORDINATION OF ALL SUBGRADE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. D=aL_p ERIMETER LANDSCAPE DETAIL 0_SHRUB PLANTING a SHRUBS AND ( + 1�'� - NOTES: OROUNDCOVERS \/( + 1 + 1. CENTER TO CENTER SPACING (D.C.) VARIES ADJACENT TO ` f FOR DIFFERENT PLANT SPECIES. SPACE EACH + VARIETY OF PLANT EQUALLY IN PLANTING AREAS CURVED PER SPACING SHOWN ON PLANS. EDGES SHALL I PLANTINGS OFF SETS FROM BUILDINGS 2. TREES ADJACENT TO BUILDING /STRUCTURE BE PLANTED + + SHALL BE BASED ON THE FLORIDA SHOULD BE PLANTED AT A MINIMUM OF 5' IN ROWS 5' IN, BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR AWAY FROM THE BUILDING /STRUCTURE WALL, PARALLEL TO + TERMITE PROTECTION. 3. PALMS SHOULD NOT BE PLANTED CLOSER THE CURVED + THAN 5' FROM THE BUILDING /STRUCTURE WALL. EDGE. + LINTEL SECURED TO SUPPORTED FOUNDATION SOEWALL, BUILDING WALL + PROVIDED AT LEAST 6 -INCH CLEAR INSPECTION ( + J 5' MIN. SPACE OF THE FOUNDATION SOEWALL EXTERIOR EXIST BETWEEN THE VENEER AND THE TOP OF ORGANIC + LANDSCAPING DOMPONENTT OR ANY I OTHER WORK IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO OR ADJOINING THE STRUCTURE, PER SECTION 2114, TERMITE + INSPECTION, FLORIDA UNIFIED BUILDING CODE, LATEST EDITION, MULCH -- + + + + REDLINE + I + + + + + + SHRUBS AND GROUNDCOVERS ADJACENT CURB @EDLINE TO STRAIGHT EDGES SHALL BE / TRIANGULAR - SPACED IN ROWS PARALLEL TO THE STRAIGHT EDGE. MA V rJTIVOt A INK MAV 9019LDIA&M SET ROOTBALL CROWN 1 1/2" HIGHER 1��` THAN THE SURROUNDING FINISHED 1_ GRADE. SLOPE BACKFILL AWAY FROM �N TREE AS SPECIFIED. ROOTBALL FOR POSITIVE DRAINAGE. PLANTING AT , PLANTING AT DOUBLE STAKE WITH TURF AREAS, SHRUB AREAS. KEEP TURF CLEAk FORA 1 B" "� TIE2P WHITE ARBOR TIE R'S KEEP MULCH 6" RADIUS CIRCLE AROUND THE FROM BASE OF TREE. RECOMMENDATIONS TREE. MULCH WITH A 3" THICK w LAYER OF SHREDDED BARK. MULCH WATER WELL w'' II 2" DIAMETER LODGEPOLE PINE AREA TO 3" DEPTH. � _ (I TREATED TREE STAKES. SET RECESS TURF AREA 6" HIGH WATER + II PERPENDICULAR TO PREVAILING 1" TO ALLOW FOR MULCH. WELL AT SHRUB ¢ WIND. AREAS, " REMOVE NURSERY STAKE BY THE FINISHED GRADE AT LAWN. FINISHED GRADE al END OF MAINTENANCE. \�{ I AT SHRUBS, ' `t ¢ 1X3 CROSSTIE, AVOID RUBBING I 11 ' � INJURY TO TRUNK. J L I. ! i i r: 1= ;: •�• O7 '' I l:r: ; ROOT -....i i =...:.:; P,. : -I ; .. _,;: \,.,f BALL I L.., . , E,,.... :.. z BACKFILL PLANTING AS PER :...... : .. ..... .: -....F ; :._...; : , ; ---... _ _ PLANT PIT DETAIL. BACKFILL MIX, SEE 2X ROOTBALL r �® AVOID DAMAGE TO THE ROOT NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS. - NATIVE SOIL BALL WITH THE STAKES, SUPPORT 0 5 ES. FIRMLY COMPACTED. 1 �-24_ PLANT PIT DETAIL STAKING DETAIL SINGLE TRUNK TREE STAKING SET ROOTBALL CROWN 1 1/2" HIGHER THAN THE SURROUNDING FINISHED W 7 GRADE, SLOPE BACKFILL AWAY FROM ROOTBALL FOR POSITIVE DRAINAGE, PLANTING AT PLANTING AT W W TURF AREAS. }SHRUB AREAS. DOUBLE STAKE WITH � � 1/2" WHITE ARBOR TIE KEEP TURF CLEAR FOR A 18" KEEP MULCH 6" TIE PER MANUFACTURER'S � J RADIUS CIRCLE AROUND THE FROM BASE OF TREE, RECOMMENDATIONS 0 a TREE, MULCH WITH A 3" THICK 0 LAYER OF SHREDDED BARK. MULCH WATER WELL LO M AREA TO 3" DEPTH. 2" LODGEPOLE PINE TREATED ,_ ,_ RECESS TURF AREA 1" 6" HIGH WATER TREE STAKES. SET STAKES a a TO ALLOW FOR MULCH, WELL AT SHRUB APPROXIMATELY 120 DEGREES 11 tZ .:,,...I AREAS, APART. FINISHED GRADE ._._. i. AT LAWN, .f ° "" .. FINISHED GRADE ,�>: ; q .- 111:I!.....: 3! AT SHRUBS. R R i FINIS --I E I - •` \, - -- FINISHED GRADE. L � J E .... . .:.:....... ::::: i t ., i ..., : ...111 i :<_. ` � i :::........ "I".........., . , � 11 ROOTBALL ._ ............... ,.. F:• ; . ROOTBALL iL i �; ;...,, : , .. : x., - w 0 to BACKFILL MIX, SEE 2X ROOTBALL - SEE PLANT PIT AVOID PLACING STAKES ¢ a NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS. NATIVE SOIL DETAIL. THRU ROOTBALL. FIRMLY COMPACTED. PLANT PIT DETAIL STAKING DETAIL @__HULTI -TRUNK TREE STAKINGIIIIIIIIIIIIiiiiiii� NOTE: CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE A BERM IN EACH PARKING ISLAND NOT TO EXCEED 6" HEIGHT FOR ISLANDS LESS THAN 10' WIDTH. A BERM OF 12" IN HIEGHT FOR ISLANDS MORE THAN 10'. 3" THICK MULCH LAYER L_ rAIIAI � COMPACTED /STRUCTURAL SUBGRADE TO REMAIN FOR STRUCTURAL SUPPORT OF CURB /PAVEMENT SYSTEM - TYPICAL. D=aLLANDSCAPE ISLAND DETAIL CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SOIL PROFILE TO INSURE POSITIVE DRAINAGE ,r-CURB ASPHALT CONTRAGTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL LOOSE CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, DEBRIS, CLAYS AND COMPACTED SOIL TO 3 -0" DEEP AND BACK FILL WITH PLANTING SOIL MIX. CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATION AND COORDINATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. "REMOVE STAKING AND SUPPORT GUYING AFTER ONE COMPLETE GROWING SEASON. 3 LAYERS OF BURLAP WITH 2'X4" WOOD CLEATS (4) AND 2'X4' WOOD BRACES (4), 90'APART, LENGTH AS REQUIRED. USE 4'X4' WOOD BRACES ON PHOENIX SPECIES PALMS. TRUNK PER 3" MULCH LAYER - & STANDARD! 2 'X4 "X30° STAKES APPROVED PLANTING -'�77 SOIL BACK FILL - A , 2 PARTS EXISTING ___ 4X TOP501L & 1 PART �f SILICA SAND �� EXISTING SOIL F, I """""""""` n 1) W n � �� ) 0) -1 cD CD 4 © CD V) 4.1 E Q) r -4- Z F E O U !�- o _, 0 d L_ aV _+ 0 J C L W -1-1 a a) = Cn o 0 C 0 - 0 L_ < 0 _ c U •0 4A<1J n (n 2 0- j 1 (1) qj -`3 LU �C) E -0 L_ CO M CZ C) U L CD U. i Q 2 0- rn C d a F, I """""""""` n 1) n -, (D ) n � �� ) 0) -1 cD CD 4 © CD V) 4.1 E LL_ (CS M -4- Z F E O U !�- o _, 0 E CD U L_ aV _+ 0 J C L W -1-1 a 0 U = Cn o 0 C 0 - 0 -1-1 5 Of 0 _ c U •0 4A<1J lJD- i5 U 0 ' ' ' ' -----� NATIVE SOIL FIRMLY COMPACTED PALM TREE STAKING , NOTE .., DETAILS r�r:' °', . ,. „ 1. y r 3.' r,�t+.� .11 'r .*. {r. 11 ' PFDJ2Ct N0. M LQ,, % '� Vii,'" Date CONSTRUCTION PLANS JUN- 1 01/31/13 201 Sheet ARE NOT VALID UNLESS PATRICK D. ROBERSON SIGNED & EMBOSSED FLORIF A. REGISTERED WITH LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT LA2 ARCHITECT'S SEAL %, N0, ' LA0001461 V , t,opyrlgnt - urawings ino concepts may not be used, constructed or reproduced without written permission from Roberson Resource Group, LLC. N m W 0 >` a Q LL_ (CS M a) U ' ' ' ' -----� NATIVE SOIL FIRMLY COMPACTED PALM TREE STAKING , NOTE .., DETAILS r�r:' °', . ,. „ 1. y r 3.' r,�t+.� .11 'r .*. {r. 11 ' PFDJ2Ct N0. M LQ,, % '� Vii,'" Date CONSTRUCTION PLANS JUN- 1 01/31/13 201 Sheet ARE NOT VALID UNLESS PATRICK D. ROBERSON SIGNED & EMBOSSED FLORIF A. REGISTERED WITH LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT LA2 ARCHITECT'S SEAL %, N0, ' LA0001461 V , t,opyrlgnt - urawings ino concepts may not be used, constructed or reproduced without written permission from Roberson Resource Group, LLC. cy) 6'. a 0 v 0 v' ca r ro Q',' LU aj o - c� ti 0 n c') U N Q i CL IS SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL /DESCRIPTION CUTY Service Line Size: Rain Bird XCZ- 100 -PRB -R 10 Length of Service Line: Medium Plus Flow for Commercial Applications. Z Purple Cap designates for Reclaimed Water, DESIGN ANALYSIS Non - Potable Use. 1" PESBR Valve and 1" U? Pressure Regulating 40psi Basket Filter, 5- 20gpm. Q Rain Bird MDCFPCAP 11 HEAD Dripline Flush Valve purple cap in compression VALVE ELEV fitting coupler. For non - potable water use. © Z Rain Bird ARV075 11 6o M In 3/4" Air Relief Valve, made of quality rust -proof U) materials, with a 6.0" drip valve box (SEES 7XB � w emitter box). Use with installation below soil. The Z valve will allow air to escape the pipeline, thus Dripline preventing water hammer or blockage. >a`� Area to Receive Dripline 18.30 < Q1 Rain Bird XFD--- P -09 -12 (14) 11,530 s.f. ft vN�W in /h I 0 `° Z XFD On- Surface Pressure Compensating M a m E O Landscape Dripline. 0.9GPH emitters at 12.0" O.C. :E Dripline laterals spaced at 14.0" apart, with Area emitters offset for triangular pattern. UV Z U) Resistant. Purple Tubing for Non- Potable Water. SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/.MODEL /DESCRIPTION Rain Bird ESP8LXME with (01) ESPLXMSM4 12 Station Commercial Controller. Mounted on a Plastic Wall Mount. rs Rain Bird WR2 -RS Wireless Rain Sensor. Water Meter 1" Existing Reclaimed Irrigation Meter, Verify Available PSI Irrigation Lateral Line: PVC Class 200 SDR 21 PVC Class 200 irrigation pipe. Irrigation Mainline: PVC Schedule 40 - - - - - - - - Pipe Sleeve: PVC Schedule 40 Typical pipe sleeve for irrigation pipe. Pipe sleeve size shall allow for irrigation piping and their related couplings to easily slide through sleeving material. Extend sleeves 18 inches beyond edges of paving or construction. Valve caliout j# Valve lumber #I' # - Valve Flow Valve Size QTY 1 396.2 Lf 531.3 I.f. 1 1 1 .4 I.f. VALVE SCHEDULE Ld LLI �C Ld Cl- I 1 WINE IF' II �6' PVCF COLUM 1'k ii ,y NUMBER MODEL Service Line Size: 1 " Length of Service Line: 5.00 ft Z TYPE DESIGN ANALYSIS Z Z M U? PSI : p Qi HEAD W IL VALVE ELEV PRECIP © Z U 0 6o M In �X U) ° -0'00, � w `� Z for Dripline 306.9 >a`� 51.57 18.30 < Q1 0.00 ft vN�W in /h I 0 `° Z o M a m E O -R :E Z w Area a Z U) C 0 43.12 V) Z m 18.71 0.00 - 0.00 ft W Cd 3 Rain J XCZ- ,y NUMBER MODEL Service Line Size: 1 " Length of Service Line: 5.00 ft SIZE TYPE DESIGN ANALYSIS Pipe Loss Critical Head: WIRE PSI PSI Q POC GPM HEAD ELEV VALVE ELEV PRECIP 1 Rain Bird XCZ -100 -PRB -R Loss for Main Line: 1" Area for Dripline 306.9 42,91 51.57 18.30 0.00 ft 0.00 ft 1.33 in /h 2 Rain Bird XCZ -100 -PRB -R psi 1 " Area for Dripline 273.9 43.12 51.42 18.71 0.00 ft 0.00 ft 1.33 in /h 3 Rain Bird XCZ- 100 -PRB -R 1" Area for Dripline 242.8 44.30 52.49 19.45 0.00 ft 0.00 ft 1.33 in /h 4 Rain Bird XCZ -100 -PRB -R 1 " Area for Dripline 190.3 40.79 45.22 17.10 0.00 ft 0.00 ft 1.33 in /h 5 Rain Bird XCZ -100 -PRB -R 1 " Area for Dripline 107.3 45.63 50.82 19.94 0.00 ft 0.00 ft 1.33 in /h 6 Rain Bird XCZ- 100 -PRB -R 1" Area for Dripline 96.8 32.11 33.25 11.63 0.00 ft 0.00 ft 1.33 in /h 7 Rain Bird XCZ -100 -PRB -R 1 " Area for Dripline 169.4 30.49 31.74 10.84 0.00 ft 0.00 ft 1.33 in /h 8 Rain Bird XCZ -100 -PRB -R 1 " Area for Dripline 217.2 34.56 36.85 13.32 0.00 ft 0.00 ft 1.33 in /h 9 Rain Bird XCZ -100 -PRB -R 1 " Area for Dripline 289.0 36.42 40.00 14.43 0.00 ft 0.00 ft 1.33 in /h 10 Rain Bird XCZ -100 -PRB -R 1 " Area for Dripline 312.3 40.36 44.73 15.37 0.00 ft 0.00 ft 1.33 in /h Common Wire 531.3 LIGVVU\lll \111"Jil'JC1 V.VV it Service Line Size: 1 " Length of Service Line: 5.00 ft Pressure Available: 60.00 psi DESIGN ANALYSIS Pipe Loss Critical Head: Maximum Station Flow: 19.94 gpm Flow Available at POC: 20.23 gpm Residual Flow Available: 0.29 gpm Critical Station: 3 n Design Pressure: 20.00 psi Loss Elev. high head to valve: 0.00 psi Pipe Loss Critical Head: 0.16 psi Loss Fitting Factor: 0.02 psi Loss through Valve: 24.12 psi Pressure Req. at Critical Station: 44.31 psi Loss for Fittings: 0.55 psi Loss for Main Line: 5.54 psi Loss for POC to Valve Elevation: 0.00 psi Loss for Backflow: 0.00 psi Loss for Water Meter: 2.09 psi Critical Station Pressure at POC: 52.49 psi Pressure Available: 60.00 psi Residual Pressure Available: 7.51 psi IRRIGATION PLANS ARE DIAGRAMMATIC • ALL IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT TO BE INSTALLED IN LANDSCAPE /SODDED AREAS AND WITHIN PROPERTY LINES. • ANY PIPING, VALVES, OR OTHER EQUIPMENT SHOWN OUTSIDE OF THE LANDSCAPE /SODDED AREAS OR PROPERTY LINES IS FOR CLARITY PURPOSES OF THE IRRIGATIOIN PLAN ONLY. • SLEEVES UNDER SIDEWALKS AND PAVEMENT ARE TO BE PLACED AS NECESSARY WITH ENDS IN LANDSCAPE /SODDED AREAS. 0 20 40 60 feet SCALE: I" = 20' CONSTRUCTION PLANS ARE NOT VALID UNLESS SIGNED & EMBOSSED WITH LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S SEAL Pnnvrinhf - nrnuuinn� -A ------ , 4. 1,1 A ar 4- .a :4.1.._ .1 _:ii y _ � J PATRICK- Dyf OBERSON FLORIIJA R' (ISTERRD: LANDSCA(E ARCHITECT N� rr) n cf) CD M °? 0 0 O0 O �a rn a Cn 't T N J a? J CZ 0 i Q) C ca M �J 0 o W rr LIJ .� E CO M C: 3: CD 0 UQ) 0 a � 0) � E Q 0- v c 0 CO C 4 © o @1 a FL o W C? � CV Lo 4/ < 'may, N � n v 0 \] � co N �ll N 1`0 rr) n cf) co M °? 0 0 O rn a Cn 't T E J a? o CZ 0 i Q) f-r ca M �J o o W .' LIJ .� E CO M (D U CD 0 a 0- C 4 a 1`0 rr) n ro co M °? 0 0 O rn a Cn 41 � E E 0 o a 0 Q) ca M �J o o o kL.<* v .n a Q .N U Q� a) 00 ct� a) 0 _v U PLAN Project No. 13-001 rlate 01/31/13 Sheet IR1 I- I � - - - - --.. .. �_ -•• 1 . _.' ,,,,., _... V vEw aL. .-. 11. lvu l vvl l i 11 [ll 111II0alvl l Il ul 1, i,v6l \.I JVI I 1 \GzVul t_v lil uup, Lt-U. Sri rs� _0 o 9 in 0 � II 0 CD m: w T11 C) , (n v , - IL , e� ...... r U) ry 0 w. HYBRID CONTROLLER: 2" PVC SCH 40 CONDUIT AND FITTINGS - JUNCTION BOX 1" PVC SCH 40 CONDUIT AND FITTINGS TO POWER SUPPLY WIRES TO REMOTE CONTROL VALVES NOTES: 1. INSTALLATION TO BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. 2. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. 3. INSTALLATION TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE AND LOCAL AGENCY CODE REQUIREMENTS. HYBRID MOONs,0�DO0REWALL MOUNT 30" LINEAR LENGTH OF WIRE, COILED WATER PROOF CONNECTION (1 OF 2) ID TAG VALVE BOX WITH COVER: 12" SIZE FINISH GRADE /TOP OF MULCH REMOTE CONTROL. VALVE: RAIN BIRD PEB PVC SCH 80 NIPPLE (CLOSE) PVC SCH 40 ELL PVC SCH 80 NIPPLE (LENGTH AS REQUIRED) BRICK (1 OF 4) SCH 80 NIPPLE (2" LENGTH, HIDDEN) AND SCH 40 ELL PVC MAINLINE PIPE \ \\ \ PVC SCH 40 TEE OR ELL PVC SCH 40 MALE ADAPTER -PVC LATERAL PIPE 3" MINIMUM DEPTH OF 3/4" WASHED GRAVEL NOTES: 1. INSTALLATION TO BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. 2. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS, REMOTE CONTROL VALVE RAINBIRD PEB VALVE PLANT MATERIAL FINISH CRADE /TOP OF MULCH POP --UP SPRAY SPRINKLER; RAIN BIRD 1800 SERIES W/ MPR NOZZLE SWING PIPE, 12" LENGHT: RAIN BIRD MODEL SP -100 1/2" MALE NPT X .49" BARB ELBOW: RAIN BIRD MODEL SBE -050 PVC SCH 40 TEE OR ELL PVC LATERAL PIPE 1/2" MALE NPT X .49" BARB ELBOW: RAIN BIRD MODEL SBE -050 NOTES: 1. INSTALLATION TO BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. 2, DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. 3. POP -UP HEIGHT ADJUSTED FOR CLEARANCE OF PLANT MATERIAL, 12" MIN. HEIGHT POP -UP SPRAY SPRINKLER RAINBIRD 1800 SERIES POP -UP SPRAY ADJUSTABLE FULL CIRCLE L ER; RAIN BIRD 130OA -F H RING pte3:7_lll� a PIPE, 12" LENGTH: BIRD MODEL SP -100 MALE NPT X .49" ELBOW: RAIN BIRD MODEL SBE- -050 SCH 40 TEE OR ELL LATERAL PIPE NOTES: 1, INSTALLATION TO BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. 2. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. 1 3OOA= -F BUBBLER RAINBIRD ADJUSTABLE FLOOD BUBBLER � FFF REMOTE CONTROL VALVE - - WITH DISC FILTER AND LLLI PRV DRIPLINE START CONNECTI ❑N F MALE ADAPTER il AR SUPPLY HEADER II I DRIPLINE TUBING LLLL. i L 1 - ISLAND PERIMETER LF -- - DRIPLINE TEE T- DRIPLINE ELL AR ! I AIR /VACUUM RELIEF I VALVE (PLUMBED TO DRIPLINE AT EACH HIGH POINT) LINE FLUSHING VALVE L'� -� PER MANUFACTURE IN VALVE BOX WITHIN LF GREEN SPACE TYPICAL DRIPLINE ISLAND LAYOUT DRIPLINE TYPICAL DETAIL - NTS DRIPLINE CENTER FEED LAYOUT DRIPLINE TYPICAL DETAIL - NTS 1 PVC DRIP MANIFOLD PIPE PVC SCH 40 TEE OR EL �3 Y2" POLYETHYLENE TUBING: RAIN BIRD XF SERIES BLANK TUBING BARB CROSS INSERT FITTING: RAIN BIRD XFD -CROSS 5 BARB TEE INSERT FITTING: RAIN BIRD XFD -TEE PROJECTED CANOPY LINE OF TREE (D SUB- SURFACE DRIPLINE: RAIN BIRD XF SERIES DRIPLINE POTABLE: XFS DRIPLINE NON - POTABLE: XFSP DRIPLINE PLACE AS SHOWN (LENGTH AS REQUIRED) ROOT BALL TIE DOWN STAKE: RAIN BIRD TDS -050 WITH BEND (QUANTITY AS REQUIRED, SEE NOTES 2 -3 BELOW) NOTES: 1. DISTANCE BETWEEN LATERAL RINGS AND EMITTER SPACING TO BE BASED ON SOIL TYPE, AND TREE CANOPY. SEE RAIN BIRD XF -SDI DRIPLINE INSTALLATION GUIDE FOR SUGGESTED SPACINGS. 2. PLACE TIE DOWN STAKES EVERY THREE FEET IN SAND, FOUR FEET IN LOAM, AND FIVE FEET IN CLAY, 3. AT FITTINGS WHERE THERE IS A CHANGE OF DIRECTION SUCH AS TEES OR ELBOWS, USE TIE --DOWN STAKES ON EACH LEG OF THE CHANGE OF DIRECTION. SUB - SURFACE DRIPLINE AROUND TREE N.T.S. RAINBIRD PEB PVC MAINLINE REMOTE CONTROL 3/4' SCH 80 VALVE UNION 3/4' DISC FILTER 3/4' PRV 3/4' SCH 80 I UNION 4 FLOW 2' MINIMUM CLEAR U } �o o n 0Q `o0© - p 0UQ� 0 o r O -1 P O' 7niO UUn - 0 O BRICK SUPPORT 1 CU. FT. PEA M x F I,P,S COUPLING 12' x 18' PVC OR POLY (I- EA. CORNER) GRAVEL SUMP VALVE BOX LATERAL LINE REMOTE CONTROL VALVE W/ PRV & FILTER DRIPLINE TYPICAL DETAIL - NTS FOR OPEN TRENCH INSTALLATION OF SLEEVES. SLEEVES ARE TO BE PRE - LOADED WITH THE LATERAL PIPE TO BE CARRIED, SIZED PER IRRIGATION PLANS. THE PRE - LOADED LATERAL PIPE WITHIN THE SLEEVE SHALL BE CAPPED TO PREVENT DEBRIS AND SOIL FROM ENTERING LATERAL PIPE DURING INSTALLATION OF SLEEVE. MAINLINE PIPE SLEEVES TO ALSO INCLUDE SEPERATE SLEEVE FOR CONTROL WIRES. WIRE SLEEVE TO BE 1". SCHEDULE 40 MIN. 4" MIN. CLEARANCE -PAVING CAP (TYPICAL) 18" MIN. zNw PAVING o" -.. \ 1 - PVC CAP (TYPICAL) NOTES; 1. INSTALLATION TO BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. 2. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. 3. ALL PVC IRRIGATION SLEEVES TO BE SCH. 40 PIPE. 4. ALL JOINTS TO BE SOLVENT WELDED AND WATERTIGHT. 5. WHERE THERE IS MORE THAN ONE SLEEVE, EXTEND THE SMALLER SLEEVE TO 24" MINIMUM ABOVE FINISH GRADE. 6. MECHANICALLY TAMP TO 95% PROCTOR. 7. SLEEVE TO BE 2 SIZES LARGER THAN MAIN LINE /LATERAL PIPE BEING CARRIED. 8. SLEEVES TO BE LOADED WITH LATERAL PIPE SIZED PER PLAN SLEEVING LOADED W /LATERAL PIPE SLEEVES UNDER HARDSCAPES 10" DIAMETER ROUND VALVE BOX, SEE SPECIFICATIONS, - FINISH GRADE. CD w M yr ISOLATION VALVE AS SPECIFIED. INISH GRADE MIN. / 2' MAX SET BOX 2" ABOVE GRADE AT SHRUBS. - SET BOX FLUSH TO GRADE AT LAWN. FOUR COMMON BRICK SUPPORTS, 10 DIA. PVC PIPE EXTENSION, LENGTH AS REQUIRED. PVC MAIN LINE. SLIP /THREAD COUPLING, 6" SCHEDULE 80 THREADED NIPPLE. BRASS ISOLATION VALVE NTS 14' TYPICAL SPACING DRIPLINE LATERAL SPACING SUB GRADE DRIPLINE SUBGRADE INSTALLATION DRIPLINE TYPICAL DETAIL - NTS VALVE BOX LID, HEAD BRAND J BOX" ON LID WITH 2" HIGH LETTERS 1OX15 STANDARD BOX. LOOP, BUNDLE, AND LABEL SPARE WIRES THAT ARE TO CONTINUE, AS OCCURS. 1/2" WIRE CLOTH GOPHER PROTECTION SCREEN, WRAP 6" UP SIDES, TWO 6X2X16 CONCRETE- BLOCK CPAS, ONE ON EACH SIDE OF BOX. Him IRRIGATION GENERAL NOTES 1. NO PLANTING SHALL OCCUR UNTIL THE UNDERGROUND AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS INSTALLED AND FULLY FUNCTIONAL. THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS TO SUPPLY 100% COVERAGE TO ALL REQUIRED LANDSCAPE PLANT MATERIAL AND ST. AUGUSTINE TURF. 2. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO ADJUST WATERING AMOUNTS AND FREQUENCY TO ENSURE PROPER ESTABLISHMENT OF ALL PLANT MATERIAL. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE FAMILIAR WITH BOTH PROPOSED AND EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS SUCH AS, UTILITIES, PLANT MATERIALS AND ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS IN ORDER TO AVOID CONFLICTS DURING INSTALLATION. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL AVOID DAMAGE TO EXISTING TREES AND SHRUBS ON SITE THAT MAY OR MAY NOT BE INDICATED ON THE PLANS. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM IN CONFORMANCE TO ALL APPLICABLE STATE, LOCAL AND REGIONAL REGULATIONS AND CODES. 6. TURF /SODDED AREAS SHALL BE ON SEPARATE IRRIGATION ZONES, THAN OTHER LANDSCAPE PLANT MATERIAL. 7. DRIP LINE, BUBBLERS, SPRAY HEADS AND ROTORS SHALL NOT BE COMBINED ON THE SAME CONTROL VALVE CIRCUIT. SPRAY AND ROTOR COMPONENTS SHALL HAVE MATCHING APPLICATION RATES WITHIN EACH IRRIGATION ZONE. 8. THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL. BE DESIGNED AND ADJUSTED TO AVOID OVERSPRAY AND RUNOFF ONTO SIGNS, BUILDINGS, WALLS, WALKWAYS, ROADWAY PAVEMENT OR OTHER IMPERVIOUS SURFACES. 9. THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM CONTROLLER SHALL HAVE PROGRAM FLEXIBILITY SUCH AS REPEAT CYCLES AND MULTIPLE PROGRAM CAPABILITIES AND HAVE A BATTERY BACK -UP SYSTEM TO RETAIN IRRIGATION PROGRAMS. THE IRRIGATION CONTROL SYSTEM SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH AN OPERABLE SOIL MOISTURE SENSOR SHUTOFF DEVICE EXPOSED PER THE MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS. 10. THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHOULD BE DESIGNED TO "STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR TURF AND LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION SYSTEMS ", LATEST EDITION, (FORTH EDITION MINIMUM) AND ANY AMENDMENTS, BY THE FLORIDA IRRIGATION SOCIETY. 11. DRIP TUBING SYSTEM COMPONENTS SHALL BE INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 12. SPRAY HEAD AND ROTOR LAYOUT SHALL PROVIDE FOR PROPER HEAD TO HEAD COVERAGE. SPRINKLER SPACING SHALL NOT TO EXCEED 55% OF THE SPRINKLERS DIAMETER OF COVERAGE. 13. LANDSCAPE OR SODDED AREAS 4' WIDE OR LESS ARE TO BE IRRIGATED WITH DRIP LINE (MICRO IRRIGATION) ONLY, THESE AREAS ARE INDICATED ON THE PLANS. 14. THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL ASCERTAIN THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS FOR GPM AND PSI DEMAND AND DETERMINE IF THE METER AND BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY IS CAPABLE OF MEETING THE DEMAND WITHIN THE ALLOWABLE WATERING TIMES METER AND BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY TO BE PER LOCAL JURISDICTIONAL REQUIREMENTS AND APPLICABLE STATE OF FLORIDA BUILDING CODES. 15. THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE SITE /BUILDING CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ANY REQUIRED ELECTRICALLY POWER FOR THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS AVAILABLE. 16. WIRE CONNECTIONS FOR ELECTRIC CONTROL VALVES ARE TO BE MADE WITH NORTHSTAR WATERPROOF SPLICE KITS (31VI DBT) OR APPROVED EQUAL. 17, MAINLINE PIPE IS TO BE INSTALLED A MINIMUM OF 18" BELOW FINISH GRADE. LATERAL LINE PIPE IS TO BE INSTALLED A MINIMUM OF 12" BELOW FINISH GRADE. 18. THE IRRIGATION CONTROLLER SHALL HAVE PROPER LIGHTNING PROTECTION INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURE AND APPLICABLE CODES. 19. CONTROL VALVE WIRES SHALL RUN UNDER THE MAINLINE PIPE. 20. THE MAINLINE PIPE AND SLEEVES ARE TO BE SCHEDULE 40 PVC. LATERAL LINE PIPE IS TO BE CLASS 200 PVC. IRRIGATION PIPE SHALL BE PROPERLY SIZED TO A MAXIMUM OF 5 FEET PER SECOND OF WATER VELOCITY FLOW THROUGH THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM. 21. NO IRRIGATION COMPONENTS, MAINLINE PIPING, LATERAL PIPING OR TRENCHING SHALL OCCUR WITHIN THE PROTECTED ZONE OF EXISTING TREES ON SITE AS INDICATED ON THE PLANS, SET BOX 2" ABOVE GRADE AT SHRUBS. SET BOX FLUSH TO �7 GRADE AT LAWN. / SPARE WIRES THAT ARE TO TERMINATE AT THIS BOX: COIL 30" LENGTH AND 1. D. TAG. WIRES TO CONTROLLER MAIN LINE AS OCCURS. POURED IN -PLACE CONCRETE 120 LBS. MINIMUM, TYPICAL -�I I VIII -1 45 DEC. ELBOW. TEE 9( PLAN VIEW c'" "SHED GRADE° I I =1� 111 = \�= 1111111 -I f(. -111- 111 -11 CAPPED LINE. END OF LINE SECTION VIEW THRUST BLOCKING NTS WIRE BUNDLE JUNCTION BOX NTS CONSTRUCTION PLANS ARE NOT VALID UNLESS SIGNED & EMBOSSED WITH LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S SEAL i r Cz OC1 co poly C LINE FLUSHING VALVE v ro (D C� QQ Cn , PER MANUFACTURE \ p 4 LF o CD IN VALVE BOX WITHIN U v E � 4--+ GREEN SPACE E c W - ___% -2 L_ y o- ■-� . di v p I c `0 DRIPLINE START 0 3� Q 0 CONNECTION M U CLv a` 0 +-, 0 MALE ADAPTER a PVC OR POLY EXHAUST HEADER c PVC OR POLY SUPPLY HEADER 0 DRIPLINE START CONNECTION c 0 SEE DETAIL 4 OF 4 S .E L -REMOTE CONTROL Lo ¢ 0 U) VALVE WITH DISC 4) Ir FILTER AND PRV d . o Q) AREA PERIMETER 0 BLANK DRIPLINE TUBING cU <CENTERED ON MOUND OR BERM) I - AR _ N 0 � - DRIPLINE TUBING LATERAL Q i AIR /VACUUM RELIEF ^ N Q 0 N VALVE 4 z -0 PERIMETER LATERALS IF N C 2' TO 4' FROM EDGE DRIPLINE CENTER FEED LAYOUT DRIPLINE TYPICAL DETAIL - NTS 1 PVC DRIP MANIFOLD PIPE PVC SCH 40 TEE OR EL �3 Y2" POLYETHYLENE TUBING: RAIN BIRD XF SERIES BLANK TUBING BARB CROSS INSERT FITTING: RAIN BIRD XFD -CROSS 5 BARB TEE INSERT FITTING: RAIN BIRD XFD -TEE PROJECTED CANOPY LINE OF TREE (D SUB- SURFACE DRIPLINE: RAIN BIRD XF SERIES DRIPLINE POTABLE: XFS DRIPLINE NON - POTABLE: XFSP DRIPLINE PLACE AS SHOWN (LENGTH AS REQUIRED) ROOT BALL TIE DOWN STAKE: RAIN BIRD TDS -050 WITH BEND (QUANTITY AS REQUIRED, SEE NOTES 2 -3 BELOW) NOTES: 1. DISTANCE BETWEEN LATERAL RINGS AND EMITTER SPACING TO BE BASED ON SOIL TYPE, AND TREE CANOPY. SEE RAIN BIRD XF -SDI DRIPLINE INSTALLATION GUIDE FOR SUGGESTED SPACINGS. 2. PLACE TIE DOWN STAKES EVERY THREE FEET IN SAND, FOUR FEET IN LOAM, AND FIVE FEET IN CLAY, 3. AT FITTINGS WHERE THERE IS A CHANGE OF DIRECTION SUCH AS TEES OR ELBOWS, USE TIE --DOWN STAKES ON EACH LEG OF THE CHANGE OF DIRECTION. SUB - SURFACE DRIPLINE AROUND TREE N.T.S. RAINBIRD PEB PVC MAINLINE REMOTE CONTROL 3/4' SCH 80 VALVE UNION 3/4' DISC FILTER 3/4' PRV 3/4' SCH 80 I UNION 4 FLOW 2' MINIMUM CLEAR U } �o o n 0Q `o0© - p 0UQ� 0 o r O -1 P O' 7niO UUn - 0 O BRICK SUPPORT 1 CU. FT. PEA M x F I,P,S COUPLING 12' x 18' PVC OR POLY (I- EA. CORNER) GRAVEL SUMP VALVE BOX LATERAL LINE REMOTE CONTROL VALVE W/ PRV & FILTER DRIPLINE TYPICAL DETAIL - NTS FOR OPEN TRENCH INSTALLATION OF SLEEVES. SLEEVES ARE TO BE PRE - LOADED WITH THE LATERAL PIPE TO BE CARRIED, SIZED PER IRRIGATION PLANS. THE PRE - LOADED LATERAL PIPE WITHIN THE SLEEVE SHALL BE CAPPED TO PREVENT DEBRIS AND SOIL FROM ENTERING LATERAL PIPE DURING INSTALLATION OF SLEEVE. MAINLINE PIPE SLEEVES TO ALSO INCLUDE SEPERATE SLEEVE FOR CONTROL WIRES. WIRE SLEEVE TO BE 1". SCHEDULE 40 MIN. 4" MIN. CLEARANCE -PAVING CAP (TYPICAL) 18" MIN. zNw PAVING o" -.. \ 1 - PVC CAP (TYPICAL) NOTES; 1. INSTALLATION TO BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. 2. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. 3. ALL PVC IRRIGATION SLEEVES TO BE SCH. 40 PIPE. 4. ALL JOINTS TO BE SOLVENT WELDED AND WATERTIGHT. 5. WHERE THERE IS MORE THAN ONE SLEEVE, EXTEND THE SMALLER SLEEVE TO 24" MINIMUM ABOVE FINISH GRADE. 6. MECHANICALLY TAMP TO 95% PROCTOR. 7. SLEEVE TO BE 2 SIZES LARGER THAN MAIN LINE /LATERAL PIPE BEING CARRIED. 8. SLEEVES TO BE LOADED WITH LATERAL PIPE SIZED PER PLAN SLEEVING LOADED W /LATERAL PIPE SLEEVES UNDER HARDSCAPES 10" DIAMETER ROUND VALVE BOX, SEE SPECIFICATIONS, - FINISH GRADE. CD w M yr ISOLATION VALVE AS SPECIFIED. INISH GRADE MIN. / 2' MAX SET BOX 2" ABOVE GRADE AT SHRUBS. - SET BOX FLUSH TO GRADE AT LAWN. FOUR COMMON BRICK SUPPORTS, 10 DIA. PVC PIPE EXTENSION, LENGTH AS REQUIRED. PVC MAIN LINE. SLIP /THREAD COUPLING, 6" SCHEDULE 80 THREADED NIPPLE. BRASS ISOLATION VALVE NTS 14' TYPICAL SPACING DRIPLINE LATERAL SPACING SUB GRADE DRIPLINE SUBGRADE INSTALLATION DRIPLINE TYPICAL DETAIL - NTS VALVE BOX LID, HEAD BRAND J BOX" ON LID WITH 2" HIGH LETTERS 1OX15 STANDARD BOX. LOOP, BUNDLE, AND LABEL SPARE WIRES THAT ARE TO CONTINUE, AS OCCURS. 1/2" WIRE CLOTH GOPHER PROTECTION SCREEN, WRAP 6" UP SIDES, TWO 6X2X16 CONCRETE- BLOCK CPAS, ONE ON EACH SIDE OF BOX. Him IRRIGATION GENERAL NOTES 1. NO PLANTING SHALL OCCUR UNTIL THE UNDERGROUND AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS INSTALLED AND FULLY FUNCTIONAL. THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS TO SUPPLY 100% COVERAGE TO ALL REQUIRED LANDSCAPE PLANT MATERIAL AND ST. AUGUSTINE TURF. 2. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO ADJUST WATERING AMOUNTS AND FREQUENCY TO ENSURE PROPER ESTABLISHMENT OF ALL PLANT MATERIAL. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE FAMILIAR WITH BOTH PROPOSED AND EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS SUCH AS, UTILITIES, PLANT MATERIALS AND ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS IN ORDER TO AVOID CONFLICTS DURING INSTALLATION. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL AVOID DAMAGE TO EXISTING TREES AND SHRUBS ON SITE THAT MAY OR MAY NOT BE INDICATED ON THE PLANS. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM IN CONFORMANCE TO ALL APPLICABLE STATE, LOCAL AND REGIONAL REGULATIONS AND CODES. 6. TURF /SODDED AREAS SHALL BE ON SEPARATE IRRIGATION ZONES, THAN OTHER LANDSCAPE PLANT MATERIAL. 7. DRIP LINE, BUBBLERS, SPRAY HEADS AND ROTORS SHALL NOT BE COMBINED ON THE SAME CONTROL VALVE CIRCUIT. SPRAY AND ROTOR COMPONENTS SHALL HAVE MATCHING APPLICATION RATES WITHIN EACH IRRIGATION ZONE. 8. THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL. BE DESIGNED AND ADJUSTED TO AVOID OVERSPRAY AND RUNOFF ONTO SIGNS, BUILDINGS, WALLS, WALKWAYS, ROADWAY PAVEMENT OR OTHER IMPERVIOUS SURFACES. 9. THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM CONTROLLER SHALL HAVE PROGRAM FLEXIBILITY SUCH AS REPEAT CYCLES AND MULTIPLE PROGRAM CAPABILITIES AND HAVE A BATTERY BACK -UP SYSTEM TO RETAIN IRRIGATION PROGRAMS. THE IRRIGATION CONTROL SYSTEM SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH AN OPERABLE SOIL MOISTURE SENSOR SHUTOFF DEVICE EXPOSED PER THE MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS. 10. THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHOULD BE DESIGNED TO "STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR TURF AND LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION SYSTEMS ", LATEST EDITION, (FORTH EDITION MINIMUM) AND ANY AMENDMENTS, BY THE FLORIDA IRRIGATION SOCIETY. 11. DRIP TUBING SYSTEM COMPONENTS SHALL BE INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 12. SPRAY HEAD AND ROTOR LAYOUT SHALL PROVIDE FOR PROPER HEAD TO HEAD COVERAGE. SPRINKLER SPACING SHALL NOT TO EXCEED 55% OF THE SPRINKLERS DIAMETER OF COVERAGE. 13. LANDSCAPE OR SODDED AREAS 4' WIDE OR LESS ARE TO BE IRRIGATED WITH DRIP LINE (MICRO IRRIGATION) ONLY, THESE AREAS ARE INDICATED ON THE PLANS. 14. THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL ASCERTAIN THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS FOR GPM AND PSI DEMAND AND DETERMINE IF THE METER AND BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY IS CAPABLE OF MEETING THE DEMAND WITHIN THE ALLOWABLE WATERING TIMES METER AND BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY TO BE PER LOCAL JURISDICTIONAL REQUIREMENTS AND APPLICABLE STATE OF FLORIDA BUILDING CODES. 15. THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE SITE /BUILDING CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ANY REQUIRED ELECTRICALLY POWER FOR THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS AVAILABLE. 16. WIRE CONNECTIONS FOR ELECTRIC CONTROL VALVES ARE TO BE MADE WITH NORTHSTAR WATERPROOF SPLICE KITS (31VI DBT) OR APPROVED EQUAL. 17, MAINLINE PIPE IS TO BE INSTALLED A MINIMUM OF 18" BELOW FINISH GRADE. LATERAL LINE PIPE IS TO BE INSTALLED A MINIMUM OF 12" BELOW FINISH GRADE. 18. THE IRRIGATION CONTROLLER SHALL HAVE PROPER LIGHTNING PROTECTION INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURE AND APPLICABLE CODES. 19. CONTROL VALVE WIRES SHALL RUN UNDER THE MAINLINE PIPE. 20. THE MAINLINE PIPE AND SLEEVES ARE TO BE SCHEDULE 40 PVC. LATERAL LINE PIPE IS TO BE CLASS 200 PVC. IRRIGATION PIPE SHALL BE PROPERLY SIZED TO A MAXIMUM OF 5 FEET PER SECOND OF WATER VELOCITY FLOW THROUGH THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM. 21. NO IRRIGATION COMPONENTS, MAINLINE PIPING, LATERAL PIPING OR TRENCHING SHALL OCCUR WITHIN THE PROTECTED ZONE OF EXISTING TREES ON SITE AS INDICATED ON THE PLANS, SET BOX 2" ABOVE GRADE AT SHRUBS. SET BOX FLUSH TO �7 GRADE AT LAWN. / SPARE WIRES THAT ARE TO TERMINATE AT THIS BOX: COIL 30" LENGTH AND 1. D. TAG. WIRES TO CONTROLLER MAIN LINE AS OCCURS. POURED IN -PLACE CONCRETE 120 LBS. MINIMUM, TYPICAL -�I I VIII -1 45 DEC. ELBOW. TEE 9( PLAN VIEW c'" "SHED GRADE° I I =1� 111 = \�= 1111111 -I f(. -111- 111 -11 CAPPED LINE. END OF LINE SECTION VIEW THRUST BLOCKING NTS WIRE BUNDLE JUNCTION BOX NTS CONSTRUCTION PLANS ARE NOT VALID UNLESS SIGNED & EMBOSSED WITH LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S SEAL r0 i r Cz OC1 co poly C Project No. 13 -001 v ro (D C� QQ Cn , , \ p 4 0 o CD �Q N U v E � 4--+ CD Qi E c W - ___% -2 L_ y o- ■-� . di v p I c `0 0 3� Q 0 `o M U CLv a` 0 +-, 0 a c 0 c 0 S .E C: C) Lo ¢ 0 U) 0 4) Ir d . o Q) M 0 cU H LU _ N 0 � Q i ^ N Q 0 N 4 z -0 6 N C J co t2 � o o r0 NOTES r Cz OC1 co poly Q) _ Project No. 13 -001 v ro (D 0lc,, Cn , , \ N O 0 o CD U v E 4--+ CD Qi E tl) W - ___% -2 L_ y o- ■-� . 0 v p I cd W U U `0 0 3� Q `o m U CLv a` 0 +-, 0 a r0 NOTES r Cz OC1 co poly Q) _ Project No. 13 -001 LL (z ro (D 0lc,, , , \ 0 0 o CD v E v E E E o- 0 0 v p v 3 0 3� U m U 0 0 +-, 0 0 NOTES ( Cz OC1 co poly Q) _ Project No. 13 -001 LL (z JUG 2013 ; Date 01/31/13 p 1 PATRICK Q.7 ROBERSON' Q Q a a_ Copyright - Drawings and concepts may not be used, constructed or reproduced without written permission from Roberson Resource Group, LLC. NOTES , DETAILS 3 Project No. 13 -001 JUG 2013 ; Date 01/31/13 p 1 PATRICK Q.7 ROBERSON' Sheet FLORIDA ,REGISTERED` IR2 LANDSCAPE- ARCHITECT L NO. 'EA0001461 Copyright - Drawings and concepts may not be used, constructed or reproduced without written permission from Roberson Resource Group, LLC. Approx. Tree Canopy e Typ I i II Eh I Approx. Tree Gonopy Typ. � I COLUM < I I Ta AIDS Fa lm 1 1 , 0.65' WALL PVCFCOLUM ' I I 6' P CP PVCF° -� . 1 L — — — — — — — -- =— j 14" — — PVCF I y 1 X12' IF" P Queen Palm I 8 "s :;cabal Palm Srabal PIm WAII' cabal Palm 1 Sabal Palm Sabol Palm x,12" 11 "� it � � Saba Pa Im 2 I I Sobol Polm Sabal Palm i 1 ' 11" Tww aA } 1 1 Saba l Pal m ; I I Sobal Balm 2 i� Norfolk Island Pine �, 2 Sabal Palm �,abal Palm I II ' I I Sabal Palm Sabal Palm ;g 1 J Sabol Palm 13 "0 Australian Pine i is ■ ,I Sabol Palm 1I` 14 „0 11i Sabal Palni � , � �' � •L�`"�i f � I' 28"0 11G.4 Sabal Palm \``1 I ! l Sabal Palm _ `. Sabo Palm 10„ ” "� ! l = 19„ i I 18 „A 10„ ■ 5' ■ 5'11 _.. I g' 'fit =ALI_ 4” , E 0.22 N. Pa I m 1s "� 3 LA �� " .II Australian Pine Grouping Sabal Palm 3 I II Sobal Palm W �-1 I. I 18" QUAD ■ — i .✓ I: I! I 12° SC�k9al imam W li 10 "� Sabal Palm Sabal Polm L� I` Australian Pine C�rou in � 3 12 °A, � i6 °� 3 L_j 1 I I 10" TWIN 9" TWIN If _ 1 Wj LL_J I °:, � � r L� 1 I X-1 -� 3 Saba Pa I m S r 1' G2ueenlPalm Australian Pine Grouping 11" TWIN ❑1a" s ..� �� 1Q ° ® „� c?bal crfm _� ._. i WALL v CD �' 1 "A 10" 12 "Al i' :1 G, !J `NO N &0 "PEfER50N° Cl- .abal Palm Y G08N., 431W 4" TRI _ ---------- ..._...._,. _....._ ._..__._.. ............. .. �.., _.... t Sa �a I Pa I m __,: I Saba l Palm Laurel Oak ■ 12” `+� y ..... 1 _ _. I — — ° — — / ° ° ° 1'L" IWI r — VvF ,y / ff 12" -'' Sabal Palm — 1 I ; 13 "02 _ -� ✓ s E ✓ Norfalr. Island Pine Saba LOWEST FLOOR 1 3 i rox e Can I .Te py- . i1 8" TRI II ! ! ! 1. •f. / Norfolk Ial� d Pi ne Live o k : I � a i 3 . •`` � Carrot Woad I I Z i `Z i EXISTING TREE PROTECTION GENERAL NOTES EXISTING TREES AND PALMS WITHIN AND ADJACENT TO THE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION AND SPECIFIED TO REMAIN ARE TO BE PROTECTED THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS WITH TREE BARRICADES PER THE CITY OF CLEARWATER REQUIREMENTS OR MORE STRINGENT PER THESE PLANS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AN INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF ARBORIST (ISA) CERTIFIED ARBORiST WITH A MINIMUM OF 5 YEARS EXPERIENCE WITH SIMILAR PROJECTS, TO DIRECT APPROPRIATE PRUNING (ROOTS, BRANCHES) AND /OR OTHER TREATMENT NECESSARY TO ENSURE THE HEALTH, VIABILITY AND ATTRACTIVENESS OF TREES TO REMAIN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CERTIFIED ARBORIST'S INSTRUCTIONS. PRUNING SHALL CONFORM TO ANSI A -300 PRUNING STANDARDS WITH FINAL SPECIFICATIONS TO BE APPROVED BY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE, PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, ALL TREE ROOTS EXISTING WITHIN IMPROVEMENT AREAS AND ORIGINATING FROM A PROTECTED TREE, SHALL BE SEVERED CLEAN AT THE LIMITS OF THE PRESERVED AREA WHERE INDICATED ON THE PLANS. ROOT PRUNING SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED BY MECHANICAL TRENCHER WITH SHARP BLADES AND UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION OF THE CERTIFIED ARBORIST. ROOT PRUNING SHALL MEET THE STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER AND ISA. .ExistinaTr e Inventory _Le�er>d - Existing Trey' per Survey ! ree Condition Rating 26" — —Tree Species n, e1 �I� I9�1 tj it II Vi 'L I I r 1 ii 1� 1 EEB 0 2013 PLF N-MIN IG ° j1[:VEL.CPMEw DEPT 7,h CIt ~" L „-� ,ur �, v 0 20 40 60 feet CONSTRUCTION PLANS ARE NOT VALID UNLESS PATR 6 •,O, ''0BERSON i I SIGNED & EMBOSSED FLORIDA( - REGISTERED WITH LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE -ARCHITECT SCALE: S" = 20' ARCHITECT'S SEAL NO.__CfA000I461__d � � I �ffia r C7 � cri Z Cf] CD ca o U 0 ® a <t LL � aJ Ci J 04 _ IL ow� Q 't z -`w- ro pct _ T LEGEND >Dod O rti u)� _ N< E :. _ : CARL€ TV PEDESTAL `/' C� a) w ELEVATION LO ,..., - ARE HYDRANT z W - n F 1L - GRATE INLET Z U Q - PAYPHON€ 0 m y - POWER POLE 3 w 0 -- RECLAIMED WATER METER 0 - RECLAIMED WATER VALVE - SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE U0 (D v r o - SIGN fl - TELEPHONE PEDESTAL - VERIZON PEDESTAL -- WATER METER U WATER VALVE ........ _. GUY WARE - - OVERHEAD WIRES 1 cv .. .. .................. - U.G. GAS LINE U.G. SANITARY SEWER LINE .... - U.G. SANITARY SEWER LINE PER UTILITY MAP N .. - U.G. STORM SEWER LINE � .' - U.G. STORM SEWER LINE PER UT1LITY MAP -- U,G. WATER LINE PER U11LITY MAP J 1W11111 - AUSTRALIAN PINE WO - BANYAN -� WO - NORFOLK PINE [l cv,& - OAK O°A - PALM 1 C ,\ 0 W13 - PINE 1s" I9�1 tj it II Vi 'L I I r 1 ii 1� 1 EEB 0 2013 PLF N-MIN IG ° j1[:VEL.CPMEw DEPT 7,h CIt ~" L „-� ,ur �, v 0 20 40 60 feet CONSTRUCTION PLANS ARE NOT VALID UNLESS PATR 6 •,O, ''0BERSON i I SIGNED & EMBOSSED FLORIDA( - REGISTERED WITH LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE -ARCHITECT SCALE: S" = 20' ARCHITECT'S SEAL NO.__CfA000I461__d � � I �ffia r � o c3 � cri U CD ca o U 0 a <t v c) J 4_� W U r si O E >1 rr LO LL co L 0 e� a. a �7 y 0 a 0 v C° U0 (D v r o U 1 cv LU W c cu O N �1 � ' J 0 -� co [l 1 C ,\ 0 c �\ N II11.2 <4 Lin 5A CTJ CC1 TLS IL cri U v U 0 a �r v c) 4_� W E >1 LO LL co L 0 a. a y 0 a N II11.2 <4 Lin 5A EXISTING TREE l Copyri Drawings and concepts may not be used, constructed or reprodu,,�` w" without written permission fror ` °'h oberson Resource Group, LLC. CTJ CC1 TLS IL cri U v U 0 a EXISTING TREE l Copyri Drawings and concepts may not be used, constructed or reprodu,,�` w" without written permission fror ` °'h oberson Resource Group, LLC. I P.O.C. N.W. CORNER OF BLK, 82 30'R I_ A u mac. LOT 3 2 406 / / J A fl .452 ` � f. ELEV.= 4.35" Q11 ' fOP 1 / 2" c•4,7g N.A.V.D.1988 �� X3.99 ,• ��. SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE r ti" P N. RIM EL= 4.28' t ' r 41 S. INV. EL. 1.28' (8' VCP) E. INV. LL- 1.34' (8" yCP) N. INV. EL= 1.36' (8 VCP) 4.30 ee IYJATC IPII Ci UTILITY SERVICE PROVIDERS UTILITY PROVIDER CONTACT PHONE NUMBER = UTILITY TYPE BR1Gfl'r US1C Day: (800) 778 - 9140 ('A 'I'V LIOUSE DISPATCH Alt: (866) 861 - 7678 G/E = CLASS ENCLOSURE NETWORKS- WORKS- OFFI('E HWF = HOG WiRE FENCE R = RECORD TAMPA LiAY (CLS) REF = REFERENCE BLK = BLOCK CLE,ARWA'I'ER BARBARA Day: (727') 562 - 4900 x7418 GAS GAS SYSFENI 1-IAGEN LEE = LOWEST FLOOR E1EV RES = REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR Cl'I'Y 011` BRIAN Gay: (727) 562 - 4960 x764} WA'111WSEWER/DRIIINAGE CLEAIRWA'FER NIAT'llERLY Alt: (727) 2-24 - 6819 M = MEASURED W/S DRNG. OB CHORD BEARING MAS = MASONRY R/W = RIGHT -CF -WAY PROGRESS CENTRAL, Day: (800) 778 - 9140 ELEC'TLZ1(' ENERGY - ST LO('A-CING CL = CENTERLINE MHW = MEAN HIVH WATER LINE PETERSBURG SE:RVIC'E'"n MSL - MEAN 5EA LEVEL SET N&D = SET NAIL AND DISK RLS/ 2512 VI;RIZON DISPA 'FCI1 Day: (800) 778 - 9140 CA.B.LE /FIBE1t/PII0N1 -. FLORIDA INC' OF'1=I('E Alt: (330)992-6100 N &T = NAIL AND TAB KNOLOGY CENTRAL. Day: (800) 778 - 9140 FIF3ER OP'FIC BROADBAND I,O('A "FiNG Alt: (8 13) 621 - 757 1 COR � CORNER OF FL, - SERVIC 'ES GOV = COVERED AREA OHW = OVERHEAD WiRE(S) FORMERLY (C'LS) OR = OFFICIAL RECORDS TB = 'T' BAR VERIZON 0/S = OFFSET TBM = TEMPORARY BENCH MARK BRING ; DRAINAGE INTO I I I 30'R I 1 I 1 III 1 t LI I I t • � h• � ,� 1 . mac• _ �� 14" 1/2' ON -SITE T.B.M. SET NAIL k DISK ELEV,= 4.41' N.A.V.D. 1988 I I ca c� t I �3 s I, �fI 1� N;, I SECTION 5, TWP, 29 S, RNG, 15 E., PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA NI T ARY SEWER MANHOLE G v IT RIM EL= 5.21' R 2' VALLEY CURB E INV: EL= 2.49' (4' VCP) s.E. V. EL= 2.50' (4' VCP) 124 /// W. INV. EL= 2.41' (6' VCP) - T N. INV. EL= 2.51' (6' VCP) x x - '9s (ASPHAL'0 W------- t Ii ' I I 1 'a L 1 _---------------------- '•----------- ----------- - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - LI RE F1 0 20 40 60 GRAPHIC SCALE 1 inch = 20 feet LEGEND - CABLE TV PEDESTAL r a.1� - ELEVAITON 27' -- FIRE HYDRANT ® - GRATE INLET d - PAYPHONE 0 - POWER POLE - RECLAIMED WATER METER O - RECLAIMED WATER VALVE (D - SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE 0 - SIGN ED - TELEPHONE PEDESTAL ® - VERIZON PEDESTAL 0 - WATER METER 0 - WATER VALVE - GUY WIRE - - - OVERHEAD WiRES _G- - U.G. GAS LINE S - -_ - U.G. SANITARY SEWER LINE ----- 5 -- - -- - U.G. SANITARY SEWER LINE PER UTILITY MAP -D- - U.G. STORM SEWER LINE ___ -_ _ U.G. STORM SEWER LINE PER UTILITY MAP ----- w - - ° -- - U.G. WKIER LINE PER UTILITY MAP VIM! - AUSTRALIAN PINE 00°0 - BANYAN DD'o - NORFOLK PINE DDWo - OAK OOIA - PALM oo' ❑ - PINE CURVE C1 RADIUS = 20'R ARC = 34.15'MC CHORD = 30.15M CHD. BRG, = S4314'44 °W M CURVE C2 RADIUS = 270'R ARC = 216.04'MC CHORD = 210.32'M CHD. BRG. = $6915'51 »W M CURVE C3 RADIUS = 10'MC ARC = 23.42'M CHORD = 18.42'M CHD. BRG. = N65'29'03 °W M NOTES CORRESPONDING TO SCHEDULE S 3.) THE SITE IS SUBJECT TO THE PLAT OF " MANDALAY - ISLE OF A THOUSAND PALMS - UNIT NO, 5 °, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 20, PAGE 27 (ON -SITE AND PLOTTABLE SURVEY MATTERS ARE SHOWN HEREON), RTiIATION TO: BAY ESPLANADE PROJECT, LLC THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP OR PLAT AND THE SURVEY ON WHICH IT IS BASED WERE MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2011 MINIMUM STANDARD DETAIL REQUIREMENTS FOR ALTA /AGSM LAND TiTLE SURVEYS, JOINTLY ESTABLISHED AND ADOPTED BY ALTA AND NSPS. THE HELD WORK WAS COMPLETED ON JULY 24, 2012. DATE REGISTRATION NO. 6137 LOT 1, BLOCK 82, UNIT NO. 5, MANDALAY REPEAT, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 20, PAGE 27, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA AND PLAT BOOK 20, PAGE 48, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 2 LOT 2, BLOCK 82, MANDALAY UNIT #5, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 20, PAGE 27, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, LOT 2, FURTHER DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 82, OF UNIT 5, MANDALAY, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 20, PAGE 48, PINELLAS COUNTY RECORDS, RUN SOUTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF CHEROKEE AVENUE, 248 FEET FOR POB, THENCE RUN N88'04'43 "E, 121 FEET; THENCE RUN S01'37'47*E, 70 FEET; THENCE RUN S88U'02 "W, 123 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF CHEROKEE AVENUE; THENCE RUN NORTH 70 FEET TO POB. (CHEROKEE AVENUE IS NOW KNOWN AS POINSETTIA AVENUE) WNW LOT 11, BLOCK 82, MANDALAY UNIT NO. 5, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN PLAT BOOT( 20, PAGE 27, AND PLAT BOOK 20, PAGE 48, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 4 LOT 12, BLOCK 82, MANDALAY UNIT NO. 5, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 20, PAGE 27, AND PLAT BOOK 20, PAGE 48, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. ARC' CEL 5 LOT 13, BLOCK 82, MANDALAY UNIT NO. 5, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 20, PAGE 27, AND PLAT BOOK 20, PAGE 48, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY APPEARS TO BE IN ZONE AE (BASE FLOOD ELEVATION OF 11 FEET), IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FiRM MAP OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, PINELLAS COUNTY, COMMUNITY NUMBER 125096 (MAP NUMBER 12103C- 0102 -G), MAP DATED SEPTEMBER 3, 2003. rr A = ARC LENGTH FPP = FOUND PINCHED PIPE PROP = PROPERTY A/C = AIR CONDNTONER FRM - FRAME PSM = PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR & MAPPER AF = ALUMINUM FENCE FZL = FLOOD ZONE LINE PT = POINT OF TANGENCY ALUM = ALUMINUM CAR = GARAGE PVM'T = PAVEMENT A5PH = ASPHALT G/E = CLASS ENCLOSURE RAID = RADIUS BEE = BASE FLOOD ELEVATION HWF = HOG WiRE FENCE R = RECORD BLDG = BUILDING HVA_ = HIGH WATER LINE REF = REFERENCE BLK = BLOCK INV = INVERT RES = RESIDENCE BM = BENCH MARK LB = LAND SURVEYING BUSINESS RL = RADIAL LINE BNDY = BOUNDARY LEE = LOWEST FLOOR E1EV RES = REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR BRG = BEARING LHSM = LOWEST HORIZONTAL SUPPORTING MEMBER FIND = ROUND BWf = BARBED WiNE FENCE LS = LAND SURVEYOR RNG = RANGE C = CALCULATED M = MEASURED RRS = RAIL ROAD SPIKE OB CHORD BEARING MAS = MASONRY R/W = RIGHT -CF -WAY CBS = CONCRETE BLOCK STRUCTURE MES = MITERED END SECTION SCM = SET CONCRETE MONUMENT CHD =,CHORD MR, MANHOLE S/E = SCREENED ENCLOSURE CL = CENTERLINE MHW = MEAN HIVH WATER LINE SC = SEG71()N GiF = CHAIN LINK FENCE MSL - MEAN 5EA LEVEL SET N&D = SET NAIL AND DISK RLS/ 2512 am = CLOSURE N &B = NAIL AND BOTTLE CAP SIR = SET i/2' IRON ROD RES# 2512 COL = COLUMN N &D = NAIL AND DISK 50 = SQUARE CONC = CONCRETE N &T = NAIL AND TAB SRF = SPLIT RAIL FENCE CR = COUNTY ROAD NGVD = NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM SIR = STATE ROAD C/S = CONCRETE SLAB NO = NUMBER STY = STORY COR � CORNER 0/A = OVERALL SUB = SUBDIVISION GOV = COVERED AREA OHW = OVERHEAD WiRE(S) S/W = SIDEWALK D = DEED OR = OFFICIAL RECORDS TB = 'T' BAR DOT = DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 0/S = OFFSET TBM = TEMPORARY BENCH MARK BRING ; DRAINAGE P = PLAT FC = TOP OF CURB D/W = DRIVEWAY PH = PLAT BOOK FOB = TOP OF BANK EL OR E1,EV = ELEVATION PC = POINT OF CURVE 103 = TOE OF SLOPE EOP = EDGE OF PAVEMENT PCC = POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE TRANS = TRANSFORMER EOW = EDGE OF WATER PCP = PERMANENT CONTROL POINT TWP = TOWNSHIP ESM'T = EASEMENT PG = PAGE TYP = TYPICAL FCM = FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT PK = PARKER KALON UG = UNDERGROUND FES = FLARED END SECTION PL = PROPERTY LINE UTIL = UTILITY FIP = FOUND IRON PIPE POD = POINT OF BEGINNING WD = WOOD FIR = FOUND IRON ROD POC = POINT OF COMMENCEMENT WF = WOOD FENCE EL = FLOW LINE POL = POINT ON LINE YAF = WROUCFN IRON FENCE ETD = FIELD PP = POWER POLE VAT = WITNESS END - FOUND PRC = POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE WRF = WiRE FENCE FOP = FOUND OPEN PIPE PRM = PERMANENT REFERENCE MONUMENT WV = WATER VALVE FPC = FLORIDA POWER CORP. t *+ ABBREVIATIONS MAY ALSO BE CONCATENATED AS REQUIRED. sn OTHER COMMONLY RECOGNIZED AND /OR ACCEPTED ABBREVIATION'S ARE ALSO UTILIZED BUT NOT SPECIFIED HEREON. GENERAL NOTES 1. UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED, THE PROPERTY DESCRIPTION SHOWN HEREON WAS PROVIDED BY THE CLIENT, OR CLIENT'S DESIGNATED AGENT. 2. UNDERGROUND IMPROVEMENTS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO BUILDING FOUNDATIONS, HAVE NOT BEEN LOCATED EXCEPT AS SHOWN HEREON. 3. INACCESSIBLE ABOVE GROUND IMPROVEMENTS (E.G. BUILDING OVERHANGS, THOSE WITHIN SECURED AREAS, ETC.), HAVE NOT BEEN LOCATED EXCEPT AS SHOWN HEREON. 4. THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY TITLE COMMITMENT, COMMITMENT POLICY NO. 27- 30609- 06- FT16 -- 11006252, DATED SEPTEMBER 26, 2011. 5. THERE ARE NO VISIBLE ENCROACHMENTS, EXCEPT AS SHOWN HEREON, 6. BECAUSE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF MOVEMENT OF THE MONUMENTATION FROM ITS ORIGINAL PLACEMENT BY PERSONS OTHER THAN THE SURVEYOR, IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT PRIOR TO ANY NEW iMPROVEMENTS ON THE PROPERTY THE POSITION OF THE MONUMENTATiON BE VERIFIED, 7. UNAUTHORIZED COPIES AND /OR REPRODUCTIONS VIA ANY MEDIUM OF THIS DOCUMENT OR ANY PORTIONS THEREOF ARE EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT THE SIGNING SURVEYOR'S WRITTEN CONSENT. 8. BASIS OF BEARINGS IS ASSUMED. 9. ALL BUILDING TiES, PROPERTY MARKER LOCATIONS AND OTHER SiTE IMPROVEMENT LOCATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE MEASURED PERPENDICULAR TO ADJACENT BOUNDARY LINES, UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED. 10. FLOOD ZONE DESIGNATION AND /OR FLOOD ZONE LINES (IF ANY) SHOWN HEREON HAVE BEEN SCALED FROM THE REFERENCED MAP AND ARE APPROXIMATE. THE TRUE FLOOD ZONE LINES MUST BE DETERMINED BY AN ENGINEER. 11. THIS SURVEY DOES NOT DETERMINE OR IMPLY OWNERSHIP. 12. THERE MAY BE ADDITIONAL RESTRICTIONS, EASEMENTS OR OTHER MATTERS OF RECORD THAT ARE NOT SHOWN HEREON THAT MAY BE FOUND IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF THIS COUNTY. 13, ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE REFERENCED TO THE NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 (N.A.V.D. B8) AS ESTABLISHED FROM CITY OF CLEARWATER BENCHMARK 1 -03" HAVING AN ELEVATION OF 2.6743 FEET (N.A.V.D. 88). 14. A DIG TICKET WAS SUBMITTED WITH SUNSHINE STATE ONE CALL OF FLORIDA ON JULY 19, 2012, TICKET I.D. NUMBER 201203547. THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN HEREON, BASED ON ANY SUBSEQUENT FIELD MARKINGS OR DELINEATIONS PERFORMED BY THE AFFECTED UTILITY PROVIDERS, WERE LOCATED BY A FIELD SURVEY AND ONLY LOCATED AS SHOWN HEREON. ONLY THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WHICH WERE VISIBLE FROM GROUND LEVEL TO THE SURVEYOR ON THE ACTUAL DAY OF THE FIELD SURVEY WERE LOCATED AND ANY UNDERGROUND UTILITIES NOT FIELD MARKED OR DELINEATED ON THE GROUND ARE NOT SHOWN HEREON. NO EXCAVATiONS OR SUBSURFACE WORK EFFORTS OF ANY KIND WERE PERFORMED BY GEORGE A. SHIMP II do ASSOCIATES, INC. TO VERIFY THE EXISTENCE OF ANY UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. THE SURVEYOR MAKES NO GUARANTEE THAT THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN COMPRISE ALL SUCH UTILITIES IN THE AREA, OTHER IN SERVICE OR ABANDONED. „•. -_ _ ,_� _ -•_ _- NT DEPT -___. _._. _. — .__.,.,,.�__•__.__. - __ -_. —. s,___— _._.,,.�., •�..n.: _.�_ _... ,_ _._.._ -_ _�_ -._- �,.�s�a, -�� .�_s ,__... _.... .. � - ....__ _____ —_� 1_y �. 1Li.�, Ii1;.:W li �l i;.,'�N. 4aj � d' -