Loading...
12/04/1996 AIRPORT AUTHORITY CITY OF CLEARWATER December 4, 1996 Present: Charles Silcox Chair Stephen Bils Vice Chair Gary Benjamin Board Member Francis J. Werner Board Member John Carassas Assistant City Attorney Glen Bahnick Civil Engineer II, Staff Liaison Gwen Legters Board Reporter Absent: Charles Kilbride Board Member The Chair called the meeting to order at 3:00 p.m. in City Hall. To provide continuity for research, items are listed in agenda order although not necessarily discussed in that order. Minutes Approval -- November 6, 1996 Member Silcox requested two corrections. Page one, last paragraph, item 1) was changed, “additional no trespassing signs similar to those along the golf course side…” The first line on page two should read, “…the correct landing direction and transmitting signal frequency is needed…” moved to approve motion Member Bils the minutes as corrected. The was duly carried seconded and unanimously. Tenant Report - FBO The FBO was present. The Chair received the report and read it into the record. It was indicated 40 shade hangars, 10 enclosed hangars, 23 hard stands and 15 grass tiedowns are occupied. 4. Security Signage Mr. Bahnick reported the City sign shop is open for business and he has ordered some signs according to the board’s instructions at the last meeting. General discussion ensued regarding missing no trespass signs along the golf course. One member reiterated his objection to no pets signs. Member Silcox will submit to staff a list of his observations regarding signage. 5. New Hangar Construction Mr. Bahnick reported the project has reached the building permit phase. Architectural drawings are expected tomorrow. A fence permit was pulled and hangars are staked. He distributed a construction schedule, stating work is due for completion by March 1997. maa12.96 1 12/04/96 General discussion ensued regarding construction and design details, stormwater drainage and retention, and the 120 day time schedule. The building skin will be light gray and white to avoid excessive heat buildup during summer months. No tall equipment will be present to create safety hazards, and locating an access gate at the south end will keep all equipment off the taxiway. Mr. Bahnick said staff will move forward with the safety overrun extension. 6. Master Plan Update Mr. Bahnick reported he and Engineering Director Rich Baier met with consultants from Post, Buckley, Shuh and Jernigan’s (PBSJ) aviation group last Friday to discuss the City’s Master Plan update. A work committee is being formed and consultants are looking into Federal funding sources for this non-revenue generating project. He said light and safety overruns must be included in the Master Plan, regardless of how the airpark layout is changed. In response to questions, Mr. Bahnick said the committee will revise the existing Master Plan; a separate draft will not be created. Deadline for commencement is January 1, 1997. He clarified PBSJ is not writing the City’s Master Plan, but are updating based on input from staff and the Airport Authority. Members felt this is a good opportunity to prepare a coherent, integrated plan to bring the airpark forward. Staff was requested to invite a representative from PBSJ to the next meeting to discuss the Master Plan updates. Related discussion regarding acreage and usage is reported below under Item #7. 7. Request for Proposal -- FBO Concern was expressed the airpark is 62 acres, but only 19 are leased to the FBO. Airport Authority members did not want to lose control of the acreage not leased to the FBO. Discussion ensued regarding the draft RFP sent to each member, street layouts and existing property surrounding the airpark. Mr. Bahnick reported he worked with Member Silcox and Mr. Baier to incorporate the Airport Authority’s comments into the airpark lease. He said the former Tampa Helicopter property and the land the CAP is requesting, have been written into the airpark’s property description. It was though this inclusion would simplify the lease process. Board members expressed strong objection to such inclusion, especially in view of the City’s position not to go forward with the CAP land request until the FBO issue is resolved. moved Member Bils to remove the helicopter pad property from the property description in the RFP for FBO, treating it separately from the FBO lease, and to direct staff to resubmit the CAP land request to the City Commission as soon as possible, explaining to the City Commission the CAP land request is a separate issue and should not be tied to the FBO lease. seconded The motion was duly . In response to a question, Mr. Bahnick affirmed it will be simple to separate the property descriptions. He noted staff has attempted to bring this issue forward three times, but each separate agenda item was pulled. Discussion ensued and clarification was requested. It was indicated the Airport Authority does not want the helicopter parcel separated from the airpark property, but from the RFP for FBO. It was felt there is no reason the CAP land issue should not go forward at the next City Commission meeting. Mr. Atanasio affirmed to he ready to go forward and was relieved to hear the clarification. maa12.96 2 12/04/96 vote motioncarried Upon the being taken, the unanimously. Discussion ensued with Mr. Atanasio regarding his desire for the City to move forward with the CAP land request. Board members suggested Mr. Atanasio prepare a written two-page summary of his request, highlighting the benefits to the City, and make a two-minute presentation to the City Commission. Mr. Bahnick will work with Mr. Atanasio to attempt to get this item back on the City Commission agenda. It was indicated the City Commission may never have had an opportunity to view the item, as it was pulled by the City Management Team before the work session. Discussion ensued regarding the possibility of finding additional land and contracting two separate FBO’s. Mr. Bahnick said staff is investigating non-exclusive rights for an FBO, although one would have exclusive use of the fuel farm. Discussion ensued regarding the legalities of seeking State funds for creating an FBO operation, and the possibility of competition. It was indicated the Airport Authority would love to see enough business to support two FBO’s. Mr. Bahnick said the selection committee is being formed to review the new RFP. He asked Members Silcox and Benjamin to serve on the committee, in their capacity as Chair and Secretary. The two members indicated they are happy to serve. Mr. Bahnick read a list of other committee representatives. The board was disappointed Mr. Brumback was not included on the committee. It was indicated two members of the Clearwater Chamber of Commerce may be invited. Concern was expressed the selection committee members should be Clearwater residents. Mr. Bahnick felt this request was reasonable and said he will pass along the information. The City Commission will review the RFP draft and return it to staff with their recommendations. Member Silcox stated some people may have looked at a copy of his RFP draft while he visited the airpark. He regretted the oversight and hoped it would not give anyone an unfair advantage. 8. Economic Benefit Analysis for Clearwater Airpark Airport Authority and Engineering Department members were pleased to see the report that the airpark has contributed to over $9 million dollars in positive economic impact to the City. 9. Airpark Budget Mr. Bahnick distributed copies of the reports Budget Director Tina Wilson had been requested to provide regarding the airpark budget. He summarized the reports regarding the last few years the airpark was an enterprise fund, and why it moved to the General Fund. Discussion ensued regarding coordinating funding with the FDOT on a five-year basis to tie in with the Master Plan. Other Business maa12.96 3 12/04/96 In response to a question from Member Silcox, Mr. Bahnick said the north end of the runway is being surveyed in preparation for an autocad drawing PBSJ will use in drafting the Master Plan. Member Silcox asked staff to investigate cutting back the hedge along the golf course. He said he will support the CAP land request. He reported FAA officials flew over to check out the airpark’s GPS approach. They were unable to land because of runway length regulations. He noted runway markings will have to be changed to an instrument approach if GPS is approved. Mr. Emshoff said VOR’s are being replaced by GPS approaches throughout the country. He did not expect to see VOR’s in use within five to ten years. Member Silcox commented preparing the tenant list for the new hangars is an issue for the FBO, not the Airport Authority. Member Benjamin agreed. Mr. Emshoff preferred the Airport Authority to make the decision, because everyone wants an end hangar. Discussion ensued regarding different ways of assigning hangars, whether existing tenants or people on the waiting list should have first choice of hangars, and if Hangar A is going to be refurbished. Mr. Silcox said many people feel refurbishment is not needed because the existing building will be okay with nothing more than a new coat of paint. Many tenants do not want to move to enable refurbishment. Assistant City Attorney John Carassas will look at the FBO lease to see if hangar assignment is a requirement. Mr. Emshoff expressed concern the dip in the runway is getting worse. It will be expensive to repair and the airpark cannot be licensed while the dip exists. He did not believe the airpark will fill up 17 enclosed hangars, because they are more expensive. It was indicated everyone wants T-stands and he was concerned the FBO could lose money on empty hangars. Discussion continued regarding the number of tenants who might want to move into the new hangars, and their potential location. Concerns have been expressed by some tenants who do not like the temporary parking arrangement. Lease rates were compared regarding the old and new hangars. It was indicated corner spaces are larger, but lease at the same rate as interior spaces. It was suggested to table this discussion for a future meeting, but Mr. Silcox said tenants want to know what they are facing. Mr. Bahnick profiled what will be involved in refurbishing Hangar A. In response to a question, he said the Fire Marshal has not mandated refurbishment, but will require sprinklers if some of the existing activities continue. Ken Love stated he investigated Hangar A during his work on the previous RFP and found problems with the roof membrane, fire wall and asphalt floors. He found the outside of the hangar could be spray painted for a reasonable cost. He offered his documentation for the board’s convenience. He pointed out the concerns of those not wanting to move involve more than just airplanes, because some bays are being used for storage. Staff was asked to arrange and Airport Authority tour of the airpark facility, accompanied by someone who is qualified to point out the problems. Mr. Bahnick presented the site plan for the proposed American Tool & Mold Company building, showing stormwater retention on City airpark property. Discussion ensued regarding whether the proposal will benefit the airpark, and size and shape of the requested land. Mr. Carassas responded to questions regarding development of that portion of the property and whether the airpark would receive any excess stormwater retention credits. It was indicated revenue from the lease would go into the General Fund, but would count toward City revenues maa12.96 4 12/04/96 generated by the airpark. Concern was expressed dimensioned drawings and capacity calculations will be needed before the Airport Authority can make a recommendation. Member Benjamin noted this item should be considered in conjunction with the five-year Master Plan at the next meeting. Mr. Bahnick said the suggestion to tie in with the Master Plan is reasonable, but pointed out the City’s Economic Development people favor granting the request and are looking for a decision. Mr. Bickerstaffe spoke in opposition to the proposal, stating retention is not the best use of the land. Concerns were expressed with the airpark losing use of the land for an indeterminate time. One person suggested the proposed retention could be reconfigured to have less impact on the airpark property. Mr. Carassas said an easement, not a lease, would be more in line with the passive use. It was indicated an easement would likely run for the life of the building. Consensus was to ask Assistant City Manager/Development Director Bob Keller to attend the next meeting to discuss this issue in conjunction with PBSJ’s Master Plan review. Mr. Bahnick will relate the Airport Authority’s wishes to Mr. Keller. He noted a request to annex the adjacent unincorporated property is driving this request. Call of the Next Meeting The next regular meeting of the Airport Authority was called for Wednesday, January 8, 1997, at 3:00 p.m., in the Municipal Services Building Human Resources Room #111. It was indicated the Airport Authority members may use their parking passes. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 5:06 p.m. Chair Airport Authority Attest: Board Reporter maa12.96 5 12/04/96 ,. ;", j, ' "1'--" L~J.. .~~ I"" J" "', ~':'::""""" '::' :""'" {';,'...:' ", . "', .' " , / ~ , I' , . ; ~ .; '1., . " ..', .' ." j. :",' -" ~', ' '~ "'. . , . ,~. ... ~,..'~'~'\ ~'.. L' .~I"',."" , .' ' .,;" j....., ..' 1,'" ", ~~!. ,1" >~'lr'~t'(..:,\ ';:..'}:k).lJ~'}..p.v~~~' ~': . ~ , , ~: " '} ....;l,\. 1~' " t.\J:;.;-"'\"hwr-"'i'"l't't'Ji'''~l""''"",,,,-...../.r........ ...... _........ . .~.:. ,... .f'..... " r,~' '. :'> t , ,. ,'..,t1: :/: f,- . ~ <of I.' \ .J ~.~~}; ., ,i' , . i ; c i ~ ~ ~;. . . ','; AA " ',; Airport Authority Minutes .. . Date DccettJaelr 4. J ( erg Cp ~~3 " '>.. . . , " I, , . " ~-.~.' -"""...------- --"-~'-_"""'-"""''''_'''_''-''_'''''''''L_'~'__' \. -" . . . . : , '. ~ ......, : ..:.... . .>. ':.. .' '~'.' ,:;..:...., ......:.:."'.::.;>~,:.~...::.~..::...,..:...:::~.,~..::...:::.::.:.>.....:'.~.:. '.: ..... '. <.. ....:...,...:..:..~..:..:.:.,.:..:...;.~...;.:.:..:!...:..::.:.:::.'.:'.~\".'{ . . ". ..... .'. _. \ '-,,, .,''': ...,..".... . ;~.... . ....... ".. d.... . .' '. .' .... .' :1:....:.' ;:.:.....L....r. :.....:'....~. '.: .... ." '.: ....-:......, ", :.,. " . ',.....'. ',::..'.~,', ...l.."".....:i...'.~~ ,'}, '...H'~... ,:,':...~,rl.i ,'" .'~'.'I ,:",:'. I '~~',.'" ...';' : I:,.',.",'.', ',",'\".,~,.. ":'l ':' ,:'" ,., ":)t t . .rrr- l ":;:.\ki \;, " AIRPORT AUTHORITY CITY OF CLEARWATER December 4, 1996 Present: Charles Silcox Stephen BUs Gary Benjamin Francis J. Werner John Carassas Glen Bahnick Gwen Legters Charles Kilbride Chair Vice Chair Board Member Board Mem bar Assistant City Attorney . Civil Engineer II, Staff liaison Board Reporter Board Member Absent: The Chair called the meeting to order at 3:00 p.m. in City Hall. To provide continuity for research, items Bre listed in agenda order although not necessarily discussed In that order. Minutes Approval n November 6, 1996 Member Silcox requested two corrections. Page one, last paragraph, item 1) was changed, "additional no trespassing signs similer to thoso along the golf course side..." The first line on page two should read, "...the correct landing direction and transmitting signal freauency is needed... " Member Bils moved to approve the minutes as corrected. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Tenant Report - FBO The FaO was present. The Chair received the report and read it into the record. It was indicated 40 shade hangars, 10 enclosed hangars, 23 hard stands and 1 5 grass tiedowns are occupied. 4. Security Slgnage Mr. Bahnick reported the City sign shop is open for business and he has ordered some signs according to the board's instructions at the last meeting. General discussion ensued regarding missing no trespass signs along the golf course. One member reiterated his objection to no pets signs. Member Silcox will submit to staff a list of his observations regarding signage. 5. New Hangar Construction Mr. Bahnick reported the project has reached the building permit phase. Architectural drawings are expected tomorrow. A fence permit was pulled and hangars are staked. He maa12.96 1 1 2/04/96 - ..~ .... .' . ,., . "I ~ . . <'.....~...~..,\. ".,1":, ,.,.: ..'tO~f". ,F:. :~l'.:.:',~ > '," .' ,.,' ,.., "\ ',' . ,.!. ';" .t""""I",':""":;:~:...".I, ,'. .,:.:':;:~""~.:....:J':...',,,',,,,'.,:~,:~,,,;~.',,,:, ..~,.' I'~~ ,t".. " " ......, """'j"":"';"'~ j' ..:. '...'.~'.":' :'.':' "'. .,'.', '~.:."..'.. '. ',~...,:~,' ~ distributed a construction schedule, stating work is due for completion by March 1997. General discussion ensued regarding construction and design details, stormwater drainage and retention, and the 120 day time schedule. The building skin will be light gray and white to avoid excessive heat buildup during summer months. No tall equipment will be present to create safety hazards, and locating an access gate at the south end will keep all equipment off the taxiway. Mr. Bahnick said staff will move forward with the safety overrun extension. 6. Master Plan Update Mr. Bahnick reported he and Engineering Director Rich Baier met with consultants from Post, Buckley, Shuh and Jernigan's (PBSJ) aviation group last Friday to discuss the City's Master Plan update. A work committee is being formed and consultants are looking into Federal funding sources for this non-revenue generating project. He said light and safety overruns must be included in the Master Plan, regardless of how the airpark layout is changed. In response to questions, Mr. Bahnick said the committee will revise the existing Master Plan; a separate draft will not be created. Deadline for commencement is January 1, 1997. He clarified PBSJ is not writing the City's Master Plan, but are updating based on input from staff and the Airport Authority. Members felt this is a good opportunity to prepare a coherent, integrated plan to bring the airpark forward. Staff was requested to invite a representative from PBSJ to the next meeting to discuss the Master Plan updates. Related discussion regarding acreage and usage is reported below under Item #7. ~ ~:> 7. Request for Proposal -- FBO Concern was expressed the airpark is 62 acres, but only 19 are leased to the FBa. Airport Authority members did not want to lose control of the acreage not leased to the FBO. Discussion ensued regarding the draft RFP sent to each member, street layouts and existing property surrounding the airpark. Mr. Bahnick reported he worked with Member Silcox and Mr. Baier to incorporate the Airport Authority's comments into the airpark lease. He said the former Tampa Helicopter property and the land the CAP Is requesting, have been written into the airpark's property description. It was though this inclusion would simplify the lease process. Board members expressed strong objection to such inclusion, especially in view of the City's position not to go forward with the CAP land request until the FBa issue is resolved. Member Bils moved to remove the helicopter pad property from the property description in the RFP for FBD, treating it separately from the FBa lease, and to direct staff to resubmit the CAP land request to the City Commission as soon as possible, explaining to the City Commission the CAP land request is a separate issue and should not be tied to the FBD lease. The motion was duly seconded. , ' ~.\ V In response to a question, Mr. Bahnick affirmed it will be simple to separate the property descriptions. He noted staff has attempted to bring this issue forward three times, but each separate agenda item was pulled. Discussion ensued and clarification was requested. It was indicated the Airport Authority does not want the helicopter parcel maa12.96 2 12/04/96 , . ",: :, __' .... : .,' .' .' :. :': <...: :,:.'.... :.:<T.:.....:.::."..:....;. ...;...~~..> :-:..<...:...'):.::.::....).:.':,.;.':.;\:~><<.:..;~.~::~:.;'~;/<.::."...:.::.\,:.:...,:)....,.. i;::' .:. ',:..<" ,:..:;......:.'..:::..:;,:,;....:...:<<:. '. ..... ..\. '. .. . ..."...... ,', ,,' \. ,,' .,... , ....' I " \ .....'\.. f ~ ',' ~~ l.",., .'. '::"'~' :'.'; '~:\,~I:~'i' ...'~.:.~/..~I'...'~>,..:.:'.:.:L--.....:,,':l:,...,[.,....,..".;' ...'.' !." f;'L : "~":.'" . I " t . ' ...... "L .1 I ' ,oI!, '. ,rl' I,' .. . j" IL' ,~" . . ... . ., "J,'.I,'. ,'~ "...' ',.... _ L I ",' ,..., :~:"';~..'.".~..:I.:~....:',~".. ";,,:' ,:$.,'" ....;,. "".' '.' I, ,~,:'~"'>,' '. I' :,': ~ ,:,,'.."''.':,.:,'' .;;.~':., ,:..:". ,.,:'l..~" :') separated from the airpark property, but from the RFP for FBD. It was felt there is no reason the CAP land issue should not go forward at the next City Commission meeting. Mr. Atanasio affirmed to he ready to go forward and was relieved to hear the clarification. Upon the vote being taken, the motion carried unanimously. Discussion ensued with Mr. Atanasio regarding his desire for the City to move forward with the CAP land request. Board members suggested Mr. Atanasio prepare a written two~page summary of his request, highlighting the benefits to the City, and make a two~ minute presentation to the City Commission. Mr. Bahnick will work with Mr. Atanasio to attempt to get this item back on the City Commission agenda. It was indicated the City Commission may never have had an opportunity to view the item, as it was pulled by the City Management Team before the work session. Discussion ensued regarding the possibility of finding additional land and contracting two separate FBO's. Mr. 8ahnick said staff is investigating non-exclusive rights for an FBO, although one would have exclusive use of the fuel farm. Discussion ensued regarding the legalities of seeking State funds for creating an FaD operation, and the possibility of competition. It was indicated the Airport Authority would love to see enough business to support two FBD's. (::> Mr. Bahnick said the selection committee is being formed to review the new RFP. He asked Members Silcox and Benjamin to serve on the committee, in their capacity as Chair and Secretary. The two members indicated they are happy to serve. Mr. Bahnick read a list of other committee representatives. The board was disappointed Mr. Brumback was not included on the committee. It was indicated two members of the Clearwater Chamber of Commerce may be invited. Concern was expressed the selection committee members should be Clearwater residents. Mr. Bahnick felt this request was reasonable and said he will pass along the information. The City Commission will review the RFP draft and return it to staff with their recommendations. Member Silcox stated some people may have looked at a copy of his RFP draft while he visited the airpark. He regretted the oversight and hoped it would not give anyone an unfair advantage. 8. EconomIc Benefit AnalysIs for Clearwater Airpark Airport Authority and Engineering Department members were pleased to see the report that the airpark has contributod to over $9 million dollars in positive economic impact to the City. 9. Airpark Budget Mr. Bahnick distributed copies of the reports Budget Director Tina Wilson had been requested to provide regarding the airpark budget. He summarized the reports regarding the last few years the airpark was an enterprise fund, and why it moved to the General Fund. Discussion ensued regarding coordinating funding with the FOOT on a five-year basis to tie in with the Master Plan. o maa12.96 3 12/04/96 ...........!.4I....~\,,'.'t1,,~,~~..~, :,', .. ~\ .:. ..... ><. . .. .....,.~... -..'."..,. . . ' : l' ~, . ....:::;...':. ;::.__" . ',,"',.' ',\.';':. ".>'::.:>,.'>.':..',.'" , " ..... :." " :;::;....~....:,~:../::.'>~;.::.::.:~;.:..:;.::'.:::::.'. .':':,'.':",' '.:.:;;.': <:' ':.:..\.:';'. .'~"~"'.'...:'.. ,.:> ,> :.....:~.:..'..':.>~;:..::.. ::~:.i.p :......'..~' \.. ',' . ..'" '. . ..I.... ," '. lr"'1 ..., .~, .... 'L' ,. , .. , . , ,. , .'''' . . ~" '. ' ".,'.. ~"'L':\ .:,I,"J" ,.' ~, ': . ...' , , ' , ~' ,": '." " .,~;. ,'. .'.~' .. ',' :"'~",,..~,,';. :.: :I,'~',_"~_'':'''':''';'':''":,,,,,,,,,~~,:,,,,,,~'''\~~I:'''''' .....1., ,', :',' I, I' I,..II:"~:: ,':.....,~.I,: ..'>> .'.1'....+::- ", :'... ..",..,:,':".'.o ,', ~ ::,'. ,'~ :,.,,'.:.'t"'~,:',,""'~, " "'"""'" I Other Business In response to a question from Member Silcox, Mr. Bahnick said the north end of tho runway is being surveyed in preparation for an autocad drawing PBSJ will use In draftlng the Master Plan. Member Silcox asked staff to investigate cutting back the hedge along the golf coursot He said he will support the CAP land request. He reported FAA officials flew over to check out the airpark's GPS approach. They were unable to land because of runway length regulations. He noted runway markings will have to be changed to an instrument approach if GPS is approved. Mr. Emshoff said VOR's are being replaced by GPS approachos throughout the country. He did not expect to see VOR's in use within five to ten years. Member Silcox commented preparing the tenant list for the new hangars is an Issuo for the FBD, not the Airport Authority. Member Benjamin agreed. Mr. Emshoff preferrod the Airport Authority to make the decision, because everyone wants an end hangar. Discussion ensued regarding different ways of assigning hangars, whether existing tenants or people on the waiting list should have first choice of hangars, and if Hangar A is going to be refurbished. Mr. Silcox said many people feel refurbishment is not needed because the existing building will be okay with nothing more than a new coat of paint. Many tenants do not want to move to enable refurbishment. Assistant City Attorney John Carassas will look at the FBD lease to see if hangar assignment is a requirement. ( i"'l~,,\ ,.~:';.1 Mr. Emshoff expressed concern the dip in the runway is getting worse. It will be expensive to repair and the airpark cannot be licensed while the dip exists. He did not believe the airpark will fill up 17 enclosed hangars. because they are more expensive. It was indicated everyone wants T-stands and he was concerned the FBO could lose money on empty hangars. Discussion continued regarding the number of tenants who might want to move into the new hangarsl and their potential location. Concerns have been expressed by some tenants who do not like the temporary parking arrangement. Lease rates were compared regarding the old and new hangars. It was indicated corner spaces are larger, but lease at the same rate as interior spaces. It was suggested to table this discussion for a future meeting, but Mr. Silcox said tenants want to know what they are facing. Mr. Bahnick profiled what will be involved in refurbishing Hangar A. In response to a question, he said the Fire Marshal has not mandated refurbishment, but will require sprinklers it some of the existing activities continue. Ken Love stated he investigated Hangar A during his 'work on the previous RFP and found problems with the roof membrane, fire wall and asphalt floors. He found the outside of the hangar could be spray painted for a reasonable cost. He offered his documentation for the board's convenience. He pointed out the concerns of those not wanting to move involve more than just . airplanes, because some bays are being used for storage. Staff was asked to arrange and Airport Authority tour of the airpark facility, accompanied by someone who is qualified to point out the problems. u Mr. Bahnick presented the site plan for the proposed American Tool & Mold Company building, showing storm water retention on City airpark property. Discussion ensued regarding whether the proposal will benefit the airpark, and size and shape of the maa12.96 4 12/04/96 ...~...z iioj.' ~~" .~.....t'. ~..' .' "I'," .:',' ....~::,. ...... '. .... .:...... ,............,'".,_,.:.;L,..,'L.... '.~:\:"::-,,' '..,,':';".' ._ ,. . r .11. \ l"t. \,:~:'. ...... I""'i'"", . <"1' ... .' , ~'. :.&a...I .' . ~ ' , . "' . ", : " ..,. ,;' '(~:'" ..,.f.:: 1, ;~,~,'. ',~'~~,~..;.~.~'........;.:':.,:.:,;". "'...1;;..\; 'J....~~ ,:: : '"..,: "'l':,:;',~,'~:,..,::.:...:'".." .;, .,;'..,...;.,:;'., ~~ ~,:..,~',.) ":", ',':.{" ".. ;i:'; .. /) requested land. Mr. Carassas responded to questions regarding development of that portion of the property and whether the airpark would receive any excess stormwater retention credits. It was indicated revenue from the lease would go into the General Fund, but would count toward City revenues generated by the airpark. Concern was expressed dimensioned drawings and capacity calculations will be needed before the Airport Authority can make a recommendation. Member Benjamin noted this item should be considered in conjunction with the five- year Master Plan at the next meeting. Mr. Bahnick said the suggestion to tie in with the Master Plan is reasonable, but pointed out the City's Economic Development people favor granting the request and are looking for a decision. Mr. Bickerstaffe spoke in opposition to the proposa'. stating retention is not the best use of the land. Concerns were expressed with the airpark losing use of the land for an indeterminate time. One person suggested the proposed retention could be reconfigured to have less impact on the airpark property. Mr. Carassas said an easement. not a lease, would be more in line with the passive use. It was indicated an easement would likely run for the life of the building. Consensus was to ask Assistant City Manager/Development Director Bob Keller to attend the next meeting to discuss this issue in conjunction with PBSJ's Master Plan review. Mr. Bahnick will relate the Airport Authority's wishes to Mr. Keller. He noted a request to annex the adjacent unincorporated property is driving this request. J:) Call of the Next Meeting The next regular meeting of the Airport Authority was called for Wednesday. January 8, 1997, at 3:00 p.m., in the Municipal Services Building Human Resources Room 1/111. It was indicated the Airport Authority members may use their parking passes. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 5:06 p.m. air Airport Authority Attest: ~~~lUJ v maa12.96 5 12/04/96 ...."... 'I " ",..;, .<...... ...~~----..........~f..... '. ~ .< '.'.;..:.\~"" ' ,,,, ';"",:' ",' ~"",:/:;~., .......:...".;'.~..',:'.>:-'.:.:<.;~.;...,;>;.:.....:.:.>.~.:/~.:~';.~\.... '.,',':"".::'.!::':<:'.,..,'~:',,:'::.':i''''.I.:/:':/'..',.:,::...:..,..;",,~~,,:..:~:.:.:(..>...:.(, .;:'....:~ , ..' " ',. . ....... -. . I~" . 'I~'.:I" """", " ' , . , . '. ,':',' .",."" 1".:-.\. .', r . "J:' ," ':.' ~,." \, :'~ ,." '.,',..,,'.'. " "..',t' ;" ..,1.,