DRC - DRAFT ACTION AGENDA - 09/01/2016
DRAFT ACTION AGENDA
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE
Thursday, September 01,2016
8:30 - Staff Review
9:00 AM
Case number:
FLS2016-07033 -- 1112 STEVENSON AVE
Owner(s):
Bruce A Walthall
1112 Stevenson Ave
Clearwater, FL 33755185
PHONE: No phone, Fax: No fax, Email: No email
Applicant:Sharon Sumner
2604 Tampa East Blvd., Suite H
Tampa, FL 33619
PHONE: (813)380-3696, Fax: (813)463-0266, Email:
Ssumner@certusbuilders.Com
Representative:Sharon Sumner
Certus Builders, Inc.
2604 Tampa East Blvd., Suite H
Tampa, FL 33619
PHONE: (813)380-3696, Fax: (813)463-0266, Email:
Ssumner@certusbuilders.Com
Location:One acre at the northeast corner of the Pinellas Trail and Stevenson Avenue.
Atlas Page:260A
Zoning District:Medium Density Residential
Request:The Development Review Committee (DRC) is reviewing a proposed seven-unit
multi-family development in the Medium Density Residential (MDR) District for the
property located at 1112 Stevenson Avenue. The project is 29 feet in height,
includes 14 parking spaces, and requests allowable flexibility from height
requirements (Section 2-303.A).
Proposed Use:
Attached Dwellings
Neighborhood
Association(s):
Clearwater Neighborhood Coalition
Presenter:Matthew Jackson, Senior Planner
8/31/20161DRC_ActionAgenda
Workflow:
Review NameTask StatusStatus DateLast Name
Determination of Complete08/02/2016Jackson
Completeness
Solid Waste Review Comments08/15/2016Pryor
These are 7 units that will require one 96 gallon garbage barrel and one 96 gallon recycling barrel at
each unit. Not sure what this area is representing. We collect garbage and recycling one day per week,
on the same day, so this area will not be able to contain 14 barrels!
Land Resource Review Comments08/17/2016Crandall
Parks and Rec Review Comments08/19/2016Reid
Environmental Review Comments08/19/2016Kessler
Traffic Eng Review Comments08/22/2016Elbo
Engineering Review Comments08/22/2016Simpson
Stormwater Review Comments08/24/2016Bawany
Fire Review Comments08/24/2016Schultz
The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments:
8/31/20162DRC_ActionAgenda
Engineering ReviewGeneral Conditions:
If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy the
site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater
capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant
and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be
installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to
construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements.
Sheets6-8 were reviewed for General Engineering criteria. The additional
details provided in the plan set may have been necessary for other
departmental reviews to provide flexible development approval. Construction
details shall be reviewed more thoroughly prior to receipt of the building
permit.
Please apply for a right-of-way permit for any work within Stevenson Ave.
right-of-way. The form can be found online at:
http://myclearwater.com/gov/depts/pwa/engin/FormsApplications.asp
DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit review. Additional
comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit
Application. **SEE PAGE 12 ON DOCUMENT.
Engineering ReviewPrior to Building Permit:
As per City of Clearwater Reclaimed Water System Ordinances, 32.351, and
32.376, use of potable water for irrigation is prohibited; the irrigation system
shall be hooked up to the reclaimed water system that is available to this site.
**SEE PAGE 12 ON DOCUMENT.
Engineering ReviewPrior to Development Order:
If the townhouses will be individually owned, new property boundaries will
need to be created by a plat. The Preliminary Plat is required prior to the
issuance of a Development Order. The Final Plat must be recorded with
Pinellas County, prior to the issuance of a second building's construction
permits. **SEE PAGE 12 ON DOCUMENT.
Engineering ReviewPrior to Building Permit:
Please provide a sidewalk along the Stevenson Ave right of way. If the
remodeling of an existing structure will exceed by 50% of the assessed
evaluation of the property where a sidewalk does not exist, an applicant shall
provide for construction of a sidewalk in an easement or right-of-way
(Community Development Code Section 3-1701B) **SEE PAGE 12 ON
DOCUMENT.
8/31/20163DRC_ActionAgenda
Environmental ReviewGeneral Notes:
DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional
comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit
Application.
Offsite discharge of produced groundwater from dewatering shall comply with
dewatering guidelines from Florida Department of Environmental Protection
(FDEP), F.A.C. 62-621.300(2).
Additional permits from State agencies, such as the Southwest Florida Water
Management District or Florida Department of Environmental Protection, may
be required. Approval does not relieve the applicant from the requirements to
obtain all other required permits and authorizations. **SEE PAGE 0 ON
DOCUMENT.
Environmental ReviewPrior to issuance of Building Permit:
Continue to provide erosion control measures and details on plan sheets.
**SEE PAGE 10 ON DOCUMENT.
Environmental ReviewPrior to issuance of buiding permit:
Relocate the storm grate inlet to another location beyond the Dog Walk area.
**SEE PAGE 13 ON DOCUMENT.
Fire Review
Fire ReviewPlans show the fire hydrant coming off the Double Detector Check Valve.
The fire hydrant shall connect directly to the city water main with no double
detector check valve. Please provide details and show on plans. Also, shall
meet the requirements of the Clearwater Community Development Code
section 3-1910 Water Supply Facilities, and loop water main supplying the
proposed fire hydrant. Please provide details and show on plans. **SEE
PAGE 14 ON DOCUMENT.
Fire ReviewAccess road appears to be in excess of 150 feet from Stevenson Ave to the
front of Unit 5. Shall meet the requirement of NFPA 1 2012 edition section
18.2.3.4.4 Dead Ends. Please provide details and show on plans. **SEE
PAGE 14 ON DOCUMENT.
Fire ReviewUnits 5,6,7 fall under the Florida Fire Prevention Code 5th edition. Town
houses are not shown to be fire sprinklered. Shall meet the requirements of
4 hour separation and structural integrity between units. Please provide
details and show on plans. **SEE PAGE 14 ON DOCUMENT.
Fire ReviewPlans show new hydrant installed. Please show how new hydrant meets the
requirements of NFPA 1 2012 edition section 18.4 Fire Flow Requirements
for Buildings. **SEE PAGE 14 ON DOCUMENT.
Land Resource ReviewShow all forms of erosion control including silt fence. Please note that silt
fence must be OUTSIDE of tree barricades. **SEE PAGE 11 ON
DOCUMENT.
Land Resource ReviewThere are two encroachments into the 10 foot landscape buffer, albeit small
ones, the curbing for the drive aisle on the west side and what appears to be
a patio for unit 2 on the east side. Clearly call out the smallest dimension on
these encroachments. **SEE PAGE 12 ON DOCUMENT.
Land Resource ReviewClarify that the note refers to Florida Grades and Standards. **SEE PAGE
20 ON DOCUMENT.
8/31/20164DRC_ActionAgenda
Land Resource ReviewProvide the name and ISA Certification number for the arborist whom
conducted the tree inventory. Or if they provided a report feel free to provide
that as well. **SEE PAGE 20 ON DOCUMENT.
Land Resource ReviewThe proposed landscape does not meet the minimum landscaping
requirements as there are reductions in the buffer. (see previous comment).
Also as per CDC Section 2-303.A.1.a (MDR FLS flexibility criteria for
increased height)
The increased height results in an improved site plan, landscaping areas
in excess of the minimum required and/or improved design and appearance.
Provide an enhanced landscape plan and a comprehensive landscape
plan may be required. **SEE PAGE 20 ON DOCUMENT.
Land Resource ReviewThere are several instances of proposed trees and shrubs being in direct
conflict with proposed fences. Provide a landscape plan that clearly takes
into account all proposed structures and has a logical design.
While the minimum landscape code requires one shade tree every 35 feet
they do not need to be soldiers in a line and may be grouped or staggered to
provide a logical and improved design. **SEE PAGE 20 ON DOCUMENT.
Land Resource ReviewThe tree preservation plan provided does not sufficiently address the impacts
to the trees. The proposed stormwater pond will severe impact the root
system. At a minimum root pruning is required at top of bank, however this
may be too close to safely and realistically preserve these large oaks on the
northeast corner. **SEE PAGE 20 ON DOCUMENT.
Land Resource ReviewTree barricades should be at a minimum of 2/3 of the canopy for oaks. These
are large trees with large canopies. Revise the placement of the tree
barricades to reflect this. **SEE PAGE 20 ON DOCUMENT.
Land Resource ReviewCrape myrtles are strongly not suggested and are not part of an improved
landscape plan. **SEE PAGE 20 ON DOCUMENT.
Land Resource ReviewProvide ground cover in the required landscape buffer areas. Sod is not
considered a landscape material. **SEE PAGE 20 ON DOCUMENT.
Land Resource ReviewPlease be aware planting larger caliper ( four inch live oaks) tend to have a
higher mortality rate. All replacement trees will be measured at landscape
final.
Tree deficit may change based on required updated tree preservation plan.
**SEE PAGE 20 ON DOCUMENT.
Land Resource ReviewThis site plan does not match. **SEE PAGE 81 ON DOCUMENT.
Land Resource ReviewThe soil report is for the wrong property. **SEE PAGE 98 ON DOCUMENT.
Land Resource ReviewThere are several instances of proposed trees and shrubs being in direct
conflict with proposed fences. Provide a landscape plan that clearly takes
into account all proposed structures and has a logical design. There are also
conflicts with the storm drain.
While the minimum landscape code requires one shade tree every 35 feet
they do not need to be soldiers in a line and may be grouped or staggered to
provide a logical and improved design. **SEE PAGE 20 ON DOCUMENT.
Land Resource ReviewFoundation landscaping along the building frontages facing the street is
required. **SEE PAGE 20 ON DOCUMENT.
Land Resource ReviewIf sidewalks are required show them on the landscape plan. **SEE PAGE
20 ON DOCUMENT.
8/31/20165DRC_ActionAgenda
Parks and Recreation Site data table needs to be corrected to add the number and type of any
Reviewprevious units/structures, as well as number and type of proposed units.
**SEE PAGE 12 ON DOCUMENT.
Planning ReviewAll conditions are required to be addressed prior to development order.
**SEE PAGE 0 ON DOCUMENT.
Planning ReviewFor the response to general applicability criteria number one, provide how
the proposal is in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and
character of adjacent proprieties. The response states that it complies with
the zoning district and does not discuss surrounding properties. **SEE
PAGE 1 ON DOCUMENT.
Planning ReviewFor the response general applicability criteria number five, provide how the
proposal is consistent with the community characters. **SEE PAGE 1 ON
DOCUMENT.
Planning ReviewOn the site plan show the areas of property within the AE 11 flood zone area.
**SEE PAGE 12 ON DOCUMENT.
Planning ReviewNo portion of living space may occur under BFE in portions of the property
within the AE 11 flood zone. **SEE PAGE 21 ON DOCUMENT.
Planning ReviewOn the elevation drawings, as height is measured from base flood elevation,
show the height from BFE to midpoint of the pitched roof. **SEE PAGE 23
ON DOCUMENT.
Planning ReviewFor the response to flexibility criteria number one, this may be revised once
the site is redesigned to accommodate the AE 11 flood zone. Also, if an
increase in height is requested, you need to fully address the criteria
discussing the improved site plan, landscaping and visibility to land zoned
LDR. **SEE PAGE 2 ON DOCUMENT.
Planning ReviewPage two of the application reflects a vehicular use area of 5,673 square
feet. As such, 567 square feet of interior landscaping is required. Please
update the landscape and site plan with Code compliant interior landscaping
treatments. Any flexibility requires a comprehensive landscape program
application. **SEE PAGE 4 ON DOCUMENT.
Planning ReviewPage two of the application states that there is 16,996 square feet of green
space within the vehicular use area. However, staff does not see any green
space within the VUA on the landscape plan. Please clarify. **SEE PAGE 4
ON DOCUMENT.
Planning ReviewPage three of the application must be notarized as well as signed. **SEE
PAGE 5 ON DOCUMENT.
Planning ReviewNo structures may exist within the required landscape buffers. There are
areas of pavement shown on the site plan within the required landscape
buffers. Either remove the structures or request landscape buffers of reduced
width. **SEE PAGE 12 ON DOCUMENT.
Planning ReviewPlease provide more detail on the outdoor gathering area. Is this simply a
slab of concrete or will decorative pavers be provided? Also, is the area
proposed to be covered or contain any amenities such as a grill, table or
chairs? **SEE PAGE 12 ON DOCUMENT.
Planning ReviewWill there be a sidewalk provided to the outdoor seating area? **SEE
PAGE 12 ON DOCUMENT.
Planning ReviewOn the landscape plan, show the required 20 foot sight visibility triangles per
CDC Section 3-903. **SEE PAGE 20 ON DOCUMENT.
8/31/20166DRC_ActionAgenda
Planning ReviewOn the ground floor plan, provide the inside width and depth dimension of the
garage so staff can ensure the minimum amount of Code compliant parking
is provided. **SEE PAGE 21 ON DOCUMENT.
Planning ReviewWhere is the A/C equipment proposed to be located? Please keep in mind
that it cannot be within the AE 11 flood zone unless elevated above BFE.
**SEE PAGE 12 ON DOCUMENT.
Planning Review
with frontage along a street right-of-way, excluding space necessary for
building ingress and egress, within a minimum five-foot wide landscaped
area composed of at least two accent trees (or palm equivalents) or three
square feet of required landscaped area. A minimum of 50 percent of the
area shall contain shrubs with the remainder to be ground cover. **SEE
PAGE 20 ON DOCUMENT.
Planning ReviewOn the landscape plan, revise all conflicts with structures and landscaping in
the perimeter buffers. **SEE PAGE 20 ON DOCUMENT.
Planning ReviewThe proposed fencing proposes access conflicts to the outdoor gathering
area as well as the property in general. Are gates proposed? Also, how will
the grass areas within the fences be maintained? **SEE PAGE 12 ON
DOCUMENT.
Planning ReviewOn the landscape plan, resolve all conflicts with proposed trees and
underground utility lines. **SEE PAGE 20 ON DOCUMENT.
Solid Waste ReviewThese are 7 units that will require one 96 gallon garbage barrel and one 96
gallon recycling barrel at each unit. Not sure what this area is representing.
We collect garbage and recycling one day per week, on the same day, so
this area will not be able to contain 14 barrels!
Stormwater ReviewPrior to Building Permit:
Please continue to submit drainage report including any pertinent
geotechnical information. Drainage report will be reviewed in depth and for
accuracy during building permit submittal.
Stormwater ReviewPrior to Building Permit:
Please consider using a standard control structure outfall. The city has
concerns of scour at outfall.
Stormwater ReviewPrior to Building Permit:
Please consider placing the pipe between S6 and S2 in the roadway instead
of under the front patio.
Stormwater ReviewGeneral Comments:
DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review. Additional
comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit
Application.
Please refer to the Citys Storm Drainage Design Criteria as found at the City
website:
http://www.myclearwater.com/gov/depts/pwa/engin/StormwaterMgt/StormDra
inageDesignCriteria.asp
8/31/20167DRC_ActionAgenda
Stormwater ReviewPrior to CDB
Scientific documentation must be provided which supports claims that
compensatory is not required. If documentation is not deemed adequate,
compensatory storage must be given for any area taken out the floodplain.
Traffic Engineering Prior to building permit:
Review
Show20' x 20' sight visibility triangles at the driveway connection to
Stevenson Avenue. There shall be no objects in the sight triangle which do
not meet the City's acceptable vertical height criteria at a level between 30
inches above grade and eight feet above grade.
(City's Community Development Code, Section 3-904). **SEE PAGE 12
ON DOCUMENT.
Traffic Engineering General Note(s):
Review1. Applicant shall comply with the current Multimodal Impact Fee Ordinance
and fee schedule which shall be paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy
(C.O.). The MIF amount for the proposed 7 unit townhome development is
$7,874.00.
2. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional
comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit
Application. **SEE PAGE 12 ON DOCUMENT.
Traffic Engineering Prior to development order:
Review
Demonstrate using a turning template that a scaled 19' AASHTO standard
passenger vehicle can exit the garage of unit 5. **SEE PAGE 12 ON
DOCUMENT.
8/31/20168DRC_ActionAgenda
10:05 AM
Case number:FLD2016-08026 -- 409 S OLD COACHMAN RD
Owner(s):Greek Orthodox Church Of The Holy Trinity Inc
409 Old Coachman Rd
Clearwater, FL 33765441
PHONE: No phone, Fax: No fax, Email: No email
Applicant:Amalia Bamis
2551 Drew St.
Clearwater, FL 33765
PHONE: (727)600-6950, Fax: No fax, Email: Amaliabamis@icloud.Com
Representative:Amalia Bamis
Mazas Pantazes Architecture And Design
2551 Drew St.
Clearwater, FL 33765
PHONE: (727)600-6950, Fax: No fax, Email: Amaliabamis@icloud.Com
Location:7.63 acres on the eastern side of Old Coachman Road approximately 420 feet
north of the intersection with Gulf to Bay Boulevard.
Atlas Page:290B
Zoning District:Institutional
Request:The Community Development Board (CDB) is reviewing a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project in the Institutional (I) District for the property located at 409
S. Old Coachman Road. The project is 67.5 feet in height and includes 302
parking spaces consistent with Section 2-1204.A(1-6).
Proposed Use:Places of Worship
Neighborhood
Association(s):
Clearwater Neighborhood Coalition
Presenter:
Melissa Hauck-Baker, Senior Planner
8/31/20169DRC_ActionAgenda
Workflow:
Review NameTask StatusStatus DateLast Name
Determination of Complete08/08/2016Hauck-Baker
Completeness
Solid Waste Review Comments08/15/2016Pryor
I do not see any plans for the Dumpsters for garbage service on any of these up loads.
Parks and Rec Review No Comments08/19/2016Reid
Environmental Review Comments08/19/2016Kessler
Traffic Eng Review Comments08/22/2016Elbo
Engineering Review Comments08/22/2016Simpson
Stormwater Review Comments08/24/2016Bawany
Planning Review Comments08/24/2016Hauck-Baker
Land Resource Review Comments08/25/2016Anderson
Fire Review Comments08/28/2016Schultz
Harbor Master Review No Review Required08/29/2016Parry
Art Review No Reveiw Required08/29/2016Parry
The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments:
8/31/201610DRC_ActionAgenda
Engineering ReviewGeneral Comments:
If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy the
site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater
capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant
and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be
installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to
construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements.
The sheet C-003 was reviewed for General Engineering criteria. The
additional details provided in the plan set may have been necessary for other
departmental reviews to provide flexible development approval. Construction
details shall be reviewed more thoroughly prior to receipt of the building
permit.
DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit review. Additional
comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit
Application. **SEE PAGE 12 ON DOCUMENT.
Environmental ReviewGeneral Notes:
DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional
comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit
Application.
Offsite discharge of produced groundwater from dewatering shall comply with
dewatering guidelines from Florida Department of Environmental Protection
(FDEP), F.A.C. 62-621.300(2).
Additional permits from State agencies, such as the Southwest Florida Water
Management District or Florida Department of Environmental Protection, may
be required. Approval does not relieve the applicant from the requirements to
obtain all other required permits and authorizations. **SEE PAGE 0 ON
DOCUMENT.
Environmental ReviewPrior to issuance of Building Permit:
Continue to provide erosion control measures on plan sheet, and provide
notes detailing erosion control methods. **SEE PAGE 11 ON DOCUMENT.
Environmental ReviewPrior to issuance of Building Permit:
An Asbestos Survey is usually required prior to conducting any demolition or
renovations. Contact Pinellas County Air Quality (727/464-4422) for more
information. **SEE PAGE 12 ON DOCUMENT.
Fire ReviewTo allow for fire department operations, relocate FDC for building to the
Southern most island parking lot entrance. Please provide details and show
on plan. **SEE PAGE 14 ON DOCUMENT.
Fire ReviewAn additional supporting fire hydrant is required to supply the FDC. This fire
hydrant shall be located within 25-50 feet, as measured along a normal
access route, of the fire department connection. Please provide details and
show on plans. **SEE PAGE 14 ON DOCUMENT.
Fire Review
8/31/201611DRC_ActionAgenda
Fire ReviewPlan shows addition to Matheos Hall building. Shall meet the requirements
of NFPA 101 2012 edition section 13.3.4 Detection, Alarm , and
Communication Systems. Please acknowledge. **SEE PAGE 14 ON
DOCUMENT.
Land Resource Review
Land Resource ReviewGeneral Note:
DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, prior to
issuance of a building permit any and all performance based erosion and
sedimentation control measures must be approved by Environmental and or
Stormwater Engineering, be installed properly, and inspected. **SEE
PAGE13 ON DOCUMENT.
Land Resource ReviewPrior to building permit:
You will be required to implement your tree preservation plan. A field meeting
should be scheduled to review your tree preservation plan prior to it being
implemented. **SEE PAGE 16 ON DOCUMENT.
Land Resource ReviewPrior to Building permit:
As per your tree table calculations with this is the deficit I calculated (72
inches in deficit) X ($48.00 a diameter inch) = ($3,456.00 City of Clearwater
tree bank) This is subject to change based on changes to the current Palm
species selected. **SEE PAGE 17 ON DOCUMENT.
Land Resource ReviewPrior to Building permit:
Royal Palms do not receive credit as specimen Palms. A specimen Palm is
one that is the Phoenix species. **SEE PAGE 17 ON DOCUMENT.
Land Resource ReviewPrior to Building Permit:
Washington Palms do not receive credit against your tree deficit because
they are on the FLEPC list as a category 2 invasive species. Please revise
this Palm to a different species of Palm Like a Sabal Palm. **SEE PAGE
17 ON DOCUMENT.
Land Resource ReviewPrior to Building Permit:
You will either need to change your species of Palm from Royal Palm to a
Phoenix species or you deficit will be increased by 13.5 inches which will
change your tree fund amount owed. **SEE PAGE 17 ON DOCUMENT.
8/31/201612DRC_ActionAgenda
Planning ReviewSite Plan/Application
1. The submittal did not include a Comprehensive Landscaping Program
application; therefore, the project must comply with the requirements of the
landscaping and buffering requirements of Division 12 of Article 3.
2. A required buffer of 5 feet in width is required along all property lines
except for the northern property line adjacent to the City Park Apartment
complex would require a 10 foot buffer. The buffer must feature one tree
every35 feet with 100 percent of shrubs. Please provide a revised
landscaping plan reflecting this requirement.
3. Please provide a color palette and building materials for the architectural
elevations.
General Applicability Criteria
1. Applicant has satisfactorily addressed the required criteria.
Flexible Development Criteria
1. Applicant has satisfactorily addressed the required criteria. **SEE
PAGE0 ON DOCUMENT.
Planning ReviewSite Plan/Application
1. The submittal did not include a Comprehensive Landscaping Program
application; therefore, the project must comply with the requirements of the
landscaping and buffering requirements of Division 12 of Article 3.
2. A required buffer of 5 feet in width is required along all property lines
except for the northern property line adjacent to the City Park Apartment
complex would require a 10 foot buffer. The buffer must feature one tree
every35 feet with 100 percent of shrubs. Please provide a revised
landscaping plan reflecting this requirement.
General Applicability Criteria
1. Applicant has satisfactorily addressed the required criteria.
Flexible Development Criteria
1. Applicant has satisfactorily addressed the required criteria. **SEE
PAGE0 ON DOCUMENT.
Solid Waste ReviewI do not see any plans for the Dumpsters for garbage service on any of these
up loads.
Stormwater ReviewPrior to CDB
Six (6) inches of separation between the seasonal high water table and
bottom of stormwater facilities must be provided as well as geotechnical
information showing infiltration rates. Additionally only 50 % credit shall be
given for void space in aggregate retention areas (see Citys Stormwater
Drainage Criteria Manual).
Stormwater ReviewPrior to CDB
Previously permitted ponds must be brought back to permitted standards.
Please submit original design drawings as well as cross sections of ponds as
they currently exist. If there is substantial deviation, re-grading of ponds shall
be required.
Stormwater ReviewPrior to CDB
Per city of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria, section 8, the post-
development flow may not exceed the pre-development flow. Please revise
accordingly
8/31/201613DRC_ActionAgenda
Stormwater ReviewPrior to Building Permit:
Please continue to submit drainage report including any pertinent
geotechnical information. Drainage report will be reviewed in depth during
building permit submittal.
Stormwater ReviewGeneral Comments:
DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review. Additional
comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit
Application.
Please refer to the Citys Storm Drainage Design Criteria as found at the City
website:
http://www.myclearwater.com/gov/depts/pwa/engin/StormwaterMgt/StormDra
inageDesignCriteria.asp
Traffic Engineering General Note(s):
Review1. Applicant shall comply with the current Multimodal Impact Fee Ordinance
and fee schedule which shall be paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy
(C.O.). The MIF amount for the new expansion of the sanctuary is TBD.
2. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional
comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit
Application. **SEE PAGE 12 ON DOCUMENT.
Traffic Engineering Prior to Community Development Board hearing:
Review
Submit a Traffic Impact Study, please contact Bennett Elbo at (727)562-4750
prior to conducting the study. **SEE PAGE 12 ON DOCUMENT.
8/31/201614DRC_ActionAgenda
10:50 AM
Case number:LUP2016-08008 -- 2251 MONTCLAIR RD
Owner(s):Montclair Lake Townhomes Llc
175 Bayside Dr
Clearwater, FL 33767-2502
PHONE: (727)797-8972, Fax: No fax, Email: No email
Applicant:Montclair Lake Townhomes
175 Bayside Dr
Clearwater, FL 33767-2502
PHONE: (727)797-8972, Fax: No fax, Email: Gus@digiovannihomes
Representative:Housh Ghovaee
Northside Engineering
300 S Belcher Road
Clearwater, FL 33765
PHONE: (727)709-0943, Fax: (727)446-8036, Email:
Housh@northsideengineering.Net; Sandy@northsideengineering.Net
Location:0.98 acre portion of a property located on the south side of Montclair Road
approximately 770 feet west of N Belcher Road.
Atlas Page:254A
Zoning District:Medium High Density Residential
Request:This case involves a request to amend the Future Land Use Map designation of a
0.98 acre portion of a property from Preservation (P) to Residential Medium (RM).
Proposed Use:
Neighborhood
Association(s):
Clearwater Neighborhood Coalition
College Park
Presenter:
Lauren Matzke, Long Range Planning Manager
8/31/201615DRC_ActionAgenda
Workflow:
Review NameTask StatusStatus DateLast Name
Determination of Complete08/05/2016Matzke
Completeness
Solid Waste Review No Comments08/15/2016Pryor
Environmental Review
Comments08/19/2016Kessler
Traffic Eng Review No Comments08/22/2016Elbo
Engineering Review
Comments08/22/2016Simpson
Parks and Rec Review No Comments08/22/2016Reid
Stormwater Review
No Comments08/24/2016Bawany
Planning Review Comments08/24/2016Matzke
Land Resource Review
No Comments08/25/2016Anderson
Fire Review No Review Required08/28/2016Schultz
The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments:
Engineering ReviewComments were included with BCP2015-09655.
Environmental ReviewPrior to issuance of site building permit:
Provide assurance that fill or other development activities will not impact
Preservation areas beyond the property line. **SEE PAGE 7 ON
DOCUMENT.
Environmental ReviewPrior to CDB:
Table1 states 0.75 acres of wetland impacts, but the requested amendment
is for 0.98 acres. Please clarify the discrepancy. **SEE PAGE 18 ON
DOCUMENT.
Planning Review1. Legal Description: A site plan is not included with this application. This
should be clarified to reflect what is actually part of the application.
2.
Description of Text Amendment: There is not a companion text
amendment with this application, so this field should be either left blank or
state Not Applicable. Correct when resubmitted. **SEE PAGE 0 ON
DOCUMENT.
Planning Review3. Address of Subject Property: The Road is not Montclair Lake Road.
Correct when resubmitted. **SEE PAGE 0 ON DOCUMENT.
8/31/201616DRC_ActionAgenda
Planning Review1. Future Land Use Plan Designation: The present FLU Designation is
Preservation, not Preserve and Residential is misspelled under Requested.
Please correct for resubmittal
2. FLU Designations for Surrounding Properties: C and HDR are not future
land use categories (listed as being South of the subject area). RL is not
immediately east of the subject area and LMDR is zoning, not future land
use. Correct all fields for resubmittal. **SEE PAGE 1 ON DOCUMENT.
Planning Review1. Consistency with Comp Plan: Response does not demonstrate how
amending this to Residential Medium is consistent with the comprehensive
plan. Response should include appropriate goals, objectives and/or policies
that show this is consistent. Please revise for resubmittal.
2. Not Inconsistent with Comp Plan: Without more information in item 1, it is
not sufficient to restate the standard.
3. Compatible with Existing and Planned Uses in Area: Response does not
state what is in the area. Please elaborate to include what is approved or
under construction on the rest of the site and also what is in the vicinity on
Montclair and Belcher Roads. Revise for resubmittal.
4. Sufficient Public Facilities: The amendment does increase density and
therefore development potential on the site. What is stated as a response is
not entirely accurate. Design is not necessarily applicable to the standard.
Response should address utilities and capacity of roadway and how those
might be affected by the additional units allowed by the amendment. Revise
for resubmittal.
5. Adverse Impacts: Please elaborate on how the amendment is in harmony
with surrounding uses. Elaboration on Item 3 may assist with this response
also. How does this allow for a better design and how does that help meet
the standard? Revise for resubmittal. **SEE PAGE 3 ON DOCUMENT.
Planning Review6. Natural Environment: Portions of the parcel adjacent to the north also
contain areas designated as Preservation on the Citys Future Land Use Map
and those areas are connected to the Subject area proposed to be amended
and intended to be filled/impacted under the SWFWMD permit. Please
explain how this will not adversely affect the area designated Preservation
located on parcel 06-29-16-00000-230-0100 (shared property line). **SEE
PAGE 3 ON DOCUMENT.
Planning ReviewSWFWMD Permit: Application only includes approval notice from SWFWMD.
The permit also needs to be provided. Include in resubmittal. **SEE PAGE
19 ON DOCUMENT.
8/31/201617DRC_ActionAgenda
10:50 AM
Case number:REZ2016-08005 -- 2251 MONTCLAIR RD
Owner(s):Montclair Lake Townhomes Llc
175 Bayside Dr
Clearwater, FL 33767-2502
PHONE: (727)797-8972, Fax: No fax, Email: No email
Applicant:
Montclair Lake Townhomes
175 Bayside Dr
Clearwater, FL 33767-2502
PHONE: (727)797-8972, Fax: No fax, Email: Gus@digiovannihomes
Location:0.98 acre portion of a property located on the south side of Montclair Road
approximately 770 feet west of N Belcher Road.
Atlas Page:254A
Zoning District:Medium High Density Residential
Request:This case involves a request to amend the Zoning Atlas designation of a 0.98 acre
portion of a property from Preservation (P) to Medium High Density Residential
(MHDR).
Proposed Use:Attached Dwellings
Neighborhood
Association(s):
Clearwater Neighborhood Coalition
College Park
Presenter:
Lauren Matzke, Long Range Planning Manager
Workflow:
Review NameTask StatusStatus DateLast Name
Determination of
Complete08/05/2016Matzke
Completeness
Engineering Review
Comments08/12/2016Simpson
Solid Waste Review No Comments08/15/2016Pryor
Environmental Review
No Comments08/19/2016Kessler
Parks and Rec Review No Comments08/22/2016Reid
Traffic Eng Review
No Comments08/22/2016Elbo
Planning Review Comments08/24/2016Matzke
Stormwater Review
No Comments08/24/2016Bawany
Fire Review No Review Required08/28/2016Schultz
8/31/201618DRC_ActionAgenda
The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments:
Engineering ReviewNo Engineering comments at this time. All Engineering Comments were
handled with BCP2015-09655. **SEE PAGE 0 ON DOCUMENT.
Planning Review1. Legal Description: A site plan is not included with this application. This
should be clarified to reflect what is actually part of the application.
2. Request: This is not clear. Is the request to rezone the entire subject area
as MHDR or will there be a portion of Preservation District remaining?
Request conflicts with the information on page 2 of application. **SEE
PAGE0 ON DOCUMENT.
Planning Review1. Requested Zoning District: Confirm request as information on this page
conflicts with information on page 1 of application.
2. Zoning Districts for Adjacent Properties: RM and RU are not zoning
districts (listed as being north of the subject area). HDR is not south of the
property. LMDR is not east of the property, and RL is not a zoning district.
LMDR is not immediately west of the property. Correct all fields for
resubmittal. **SEE PAGE 1 ON DOCUMENT.
Planning Review1. Consistency with Comp Plan and Furthers Purpose of Community
Development Code: Response does not demonstrate how amending this to
MHDR is consistent with the comprehensive plan. Response should include
appropriate goals, objectives and/or policies that show this is consistent. The
surrounding use is not LMDR. Response should address the purpose of the
requested zoning district and state how the amendment furthers the purpose.
Revise for resubmittal.
2. Available Uses: Response is unclear. There are several zoning districts in
the area, with LMDR being further west. Response should discuss how this is
consistent with the rest of the site, as well as the uses in the immediate
vicinity. Clarify in resubmittal.
3. Needs and Character of Neighborhood: Response to standard is not clear.
There are multiple zoning districts and developments in the area so response
should address more clearly. Clarify and correct typos.
4. District Boundaries: There is not a site plan attached. Revise. **SEE
PAGE3 ON DOCUMENT.
Planning ReviewTable One: Project Wetland and Other Surface Water Summary states 0.75
acres of wetland impacts, but the requested amendment is for 0.98 acres.
Clarify the discrepancy. **SEE PAGE 18 ON DOCUMENT.
Planning ReviewSWFWMD Permit: Application only includes approval notice from SWFWMD.
The permit also needs to be provided. Include in resubmittal. **SEE PAGE
19 ON DOCUMENT.
8/31/201619DRC_ActionAgenda
4:00 PM
Case number:ANX2016-08025 -- 2130 BELL CHEER DR
Owner(s):Lloyd Charles Iii
2192 Bell Cheer Drive
Clearwater, FL 33764
PHONE: (727)443-0946, Fax: No fax, Email: No email
Applicant:
2130 Bell Cheer Dr
Clearwater, FL 33764-4846
PHONE: (954)990-6661, Fax: No fax, Email: No email
Location:0.518 acres located generally south of Druid Road, west of South Hercules
Avenue, north of Lakeview Road, and west of South Belcher Road.
Atlas Page:308B
Zoning District:Low Medium Density Residential
Request:This case involves two requests for voluntary annexation. It is proposed that the
properties be assigned an initial Future Land Use Map designation of Residential
Low (RL) and an initial zoning district of Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR).
The addresses are 2130 and 2192 Bell Cheer Drive
Proposed Use:Detached Dwelling
Neighborhood
Association(s):
Clearwater Neighborhood Coalition
Presenter:
Kyle Brotherton, Planner
8/31/201620DRC_ActionAgenda
Workflow:
Review NameTask StatusStatus DateLast Name
Determination of Complete08/02/2016Brotherton
Completeness
Planning Review No Comments08/04/2016Brotherton
Engineering Review
Comments08/12/2016Simpson
Solid Waste Review No Comments08/15/2016Pryor
Environmental Review
No Comments08/19/2016Kessler
Parks and Rec Review No Comments08/22/2016Reid
Traffic Eng Review
No Comments08/22/2016Elbo
Stormwater Review No Comments08/24/2016Bawany
Land Resource Review
No Comments08/25/2016Anderson
Fire Review No Comments08/28/2016Schultz
The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments:
Engineering ReviewGeneral Comments:
Annexation into the City of Clearwater will generate monthly stormwater
utility fees on your City Utility bill. In contrast, properties in Unincorporated
Pinellas County are typically assessed a yearly stormwater utility fee as part
of the property tax bill.
Please note, any changes to the site and/or building shall require bringing all
sub-standard sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the
project up to standard, including A.D.A. standards (truncated domes per
FDOT Index #304). **SEE PAGE 0 ON DOCUMENT.
8/31/201621DRC_ActionAgenda
4:00 PM
Case number:ANX2016-08026 -- 3041 MERRILL AVE
Owner(s):Foy, Becky L
3041 Merrill Ave
Clearwater, FL 33759-3450
PHONE: (727)687-9031, Fax: No fax, Email: No email
Applicant:
3041 Merrill Ave
Clearwater, FL 33759-3450
PHONE: (727)687-9031, Fax: No fax, Email: No email
Location:0.185 acres located on the south side of Merrill Avenue approximately 450 feet
west of McMullen Booth Road.
Atlas Page:283A
Zoning District:Low Medium Density Residential
Request:This case involves a request for voluntary annexation. It is proposed that the
property be assigned an initial Future Land Use Map category of Residential Low
(RL) and an initial zoning district of Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR).
Proposed Use:Detached Dwelling
Neighborhood
Association(s):
Clearwater Neighborhood Coalition
Presenter:Kyle Brotherton, Planner
8/31/201622DRC_ActionAgenda
Workflow:
Review NameTask StatusStatus DateLast Name
Determination of Complete08/02/2016Brotherton
Completeness
Planning Review No Comments08/04/2016Brotherton
Engineering Review
Comments08/12/2016Simpson
Solid Waste Review No Comments08/15/2016Pryor
Environmental Review
No Comments08/19/2016Kessler
Parks and Rec Review No Comments08/22/2016Reid
Traffic Eng Review
No Comments08/22/2016Elbo
Stormwater Review No Comments08/24/2016Bawany
Land Resource Review
No Comments08/25/2016Anderson
Fire Review No Comments08/28/2016Schultz
The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments:
Engineering ReviewGeneral Comments:
Annexation into the City of Clearwater will generate monthly stormwater
utility fees on your City Utility bill. In contrast, properties in Unincorporated
Pinellas County are typically assessed a yearly stormwater utility fee as part
of the property tax bill.
Please note, any changes to the site and/or building shall require bringing all
sub-standard sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the
project up to standard, including A.D.A. standards (truncated domes per
FDOT Index #304). **SEE PAGE 0 ON DOCUMENT.
8/31/201623DRC_ActionAgenda
4:00 PM
Case number:ANX2016-08027 -- 1846 PINELAND DR
Owner(s):Jeff Bagby
1846 Pineland Dr
Clearwater, FL 33755-1911
PHONE: (727)641-2250, Fax: No fax, Email: No email
Applicant:Jeff Bagby
1846 Pineland Dr
Clearwater, FL 33755-1911
PHONE: (727)641-2250, Fax: No fax, Email: No email
Location:0.169 acres located on the west side of Pineland Drive approximately 360 feet
south of Sunset Point Road.
Atlas Page:260B
Zoning District:Low Medium Density Residential
Request:This case involves a request for voluntary annexation. It is proposed that the
property be assigned an initial Future Land Use Map designation of Residential
Urban (RU) and an initial zoning district of Low Medium Density Residential
(LMDR).
Proposed Use:Detached Dwelling
Neighborhood
Association(s):
Clearwater Neighborhood Coalition
Presenter:
Kyle Brotherton, Planner
8/31/201624DRC_ActionAgenda
Workflow:
Review NameTask StatusStatus DateLast Name
Determination of Complete08/02/2016Brotherton
Completeness
Planning Review No Comments08/04/2016Brotherton
Engineering Review
Comments08/12/2016Simpson
Solid Waste Review No Comments08/15/2016Pryor
Environmental Review
No Comments08/19/2016Kessler
Parks and Rec Review No Comments08/22/2016Reid
Traffic Eng Review
No Comments08/22/2016Elbo
Stormwater Review No Comments08/24/2016Bawany
Land Resource Review
No Comments08/25/2016Anderson
Fire Review No Comments08/28/2016Schultz
The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments:
Engineering ReviewGeneral Comments:
Annexation into the City of Clearwater will generate monthly stormwater
utility fees on your City Utility bill. In contrast, properties in Unincorporated
Pinellas County are typically assessed a yearly stormwater utility fee as part
of the property tax bill.
Please note, any changes to the site and/or building shall require bringing all
sub-standard sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the
project up to standard, including A.D.A. standards (truncated domes per
FDOT Index #304). **SEE PAGE 0 ON DOCUMENT.
8/31/201625DRC_ActionAgenda
4:00 PM
Case number:ANX2016-08028 -- 606 BAYVIEW AVE
Owner(s):Our Lady Of Divine Providence House Of Prayer Foundation, Inc
711 S Bayview Ave
Clearwater, FL 33759
PHONE: (727)441-8966, Fax: No fax, Email: No email
Applicant:
711 S Bayview Ave
Clearwater, FL 33759
PHONE: (727)441-8966, Fax: No fax, Email: Bja@macfar.Com
Location:1.18 acres located generally south of Gulf to Bay Blvd, west of the Bayside Bridge,
north of Old Tampa Bay, and east of Thornton Road.
Atlas Page:301A
Zoning District:Institutional
Request:This case involves two requests for voluntary annexation. The properties will be
assigned a Future Land Use Map category of Institutional (I) (see concurrent case
LUP2016-08007) and a zoning district of Institutional (I) (see concurrent case
REZ2016-08004). The addresses are: 606 S. Bayview Avenue and an
unaddressed parcel approximately 220 feet south of Gulf to Bay Blvd.
Proposed Use:Places of Worship
Neighborhood
Association(s):
Clearwater Neighborhood Coalition
Presenter:Kyle Brotherton, Planner
8/31/201626DRC_ActionAgenda
Workflow:
Review NameTask StatusStatus DateLast Name
Determination of Complete08/04/2016Brotherton
Completeness
Planning Review No Comments08/04/2016Brotherton
Engineering Review
Comments08/12/2016Simpson
Solid Waste Review No Comments08/15/2016Pryor
Parks and Rec Review
No Comments08/19/2016Reid
No issues on annexation of property. Note: If the property is redeveloped the project will be reviewed
and impact fees may be due at that time.
Environmental Review No Comments08/19/2016Kessler
Traffic Eng Review No Comments08/22/2016Elbo
Stormwater Review No Comments08/24/2016Bawany
Land Resource Review No Comments08/25/2016Anderson
Fire Review No Comments08/28/2016Schultz
The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments:
Engineering ReviewGeneral Comments:
Annexation into the City of Clearwater will generate monthly stormwater
utility fees on your City Utility bill. In contrast, properties in Unincorporated
Pinellas County are typically assessed a yearly stormwater utility fee as part
of the property tax bill.
Please note, any changes to the site and/or building shall require bringing all
sub-standard sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the
project up to standard, including A.D.A. standards (truncated domes per
FDOT Index #304). **SEE PAGE 0 ON DOCUMENT.
8/31/201627DRC_ActionAgenda
4:00 PM
Case number:FLD2016-07025 -- 600 MANDALAY AVE 1
Owner(s):Xania Inc
1299 Main St Ste E
Dunedin, FL 34698533
PHONE: No phone, Fax: No fax, Email: No email
Applicant:Brian Barker
565 S. Hercules Ave
Clearwater, FL 33764
PHONE: (727)822-4151, Fax: (727)821-7255, Email:
Brian@deuelengineering.Com
Representative:Brian Barker
Deuel & Associates
565 S. Hercules Ave
Clearwater, FL 33764
PHONE: (727)822-4151, Fax: (727)821-7255, Email:
Brian@deuelengineering.Com
Location:0.031 acres located at the northwest corner of Mandalay Avenue and Kendall
Street.
Atlas Page:258A
Zoning District:Tourist
Request:The Community Development Board (CDB) is reviewing a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project in the Tourist (T) District for the property located at 600
Mandalay Avenue. The project is 12 feet in height, includes zero parking spaces
and requests flexibility consistent with Sections 2-803.D and 3-1202.G.
Proposed Use:Restaurants
Neighborhood
Association(s):
Clearwater Beach Association
Clearwater Neighborhood Coalition
Presenter:Melissa Hauck-Baker, Senior Planner
8/31/201628DRC_ActionAgenda
Workflow:
Review NameTask StatusStatus DateLast Name
Determination of Complete08/08/2016Hauck-Baker
Completeness
Solid Waste Review Comments08/15/2016Pryor
As this business expands we will have to discuss the garbage issues and the lack of room for barrel
storage. Our garbage service for this type barrel is now one day per week.
Parks and Rec Review No Comments08/19/2016Reid
Environmental Review Comments08/19/2016Kessler
Traffic Eng Review Comments08/22/2016Elbo
Engineering Review Comments08/22/2016Simpson
Stormwater Review Comments08/24/2016Bawany
Planning Review Comments08/24/2016Hauck-Baker
Land Resource Review No Comments08/25/2016Anderson
Fire Review No Comments08/28/2016Schultz
Harbor Master Review No Review Required08/29/2016Parry
Art Review No Reveiw Required08/29/2016Parry
The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments:
8/31/201629DRC_ActionAgenda
Engineering ReviewGeneral Comments:
If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy
site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater
capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant
and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be
installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to
construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements.
Only Sheet A-2 was reviewed for General Engineering criteria. The
additional details provided in the plan set may have been necessary for other
departmental reviews to provide flexible development approval. Construction
plans shall be reviewed in more detail prior to receipt of the building permit.
Any work in city right of way will require a city right of way use permit which is
permitted through the Engineering Department. Right of way permits can be
found online at
http://myclearwater.com/gov/depts/pwa/engin/FormsApplications.asp
DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review. Additional
comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit
Application. **SEE PAGE 10 ON DOCUMENT.
Engineering ReviewPrior to Community Development Board:
Any changes to public parking or parking meters must be approved by the
city's parking division. Please acknowledge. **SEE PAGE 10 ON
DOCUMENT.
Engineering ReviewPrior to Community Development Board:
Seating in the public right of way requires an outdoor cafe application.
Please acknowledge. **SEE PAGE 10 ON DOCUMENT.
Environmental ReviewGeneral Notes:
DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional
comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit
Application. **SEE PAGE 0 ON DOCUMENT.
Environmental ReviewPrior to issuance of Building Permit:
An Asbestos Survey is usually required prior to conducting any demolition or
renovations. Contact Pinellas County Air Quality (727/464-4422) for more
information. **SEE PAGE 0 ON DOCUMENT.
Planning ReviewSite Plan/Application
1. Please provide commentary regarding the project compliance with the
Old Florida Character District and Design Guidelines of
Beach by Design
.
General Applicability Criteria
1. Applicant has satisfactorily addressed the required criteria.
Flexible Development Criteria
1. Applicant has satisfactorily addressed the required criteria. **SEE
PAGE0 ON DOCUMENT.
8/31/201630DRC_ActionAgenda
Solid Waste ReviewAs this business expands we will have to discuss the garbage issues and the
lack of room for barrel storage. Our garbage service for this type barrel is
now one day per week.
Stormwater ReviewGeneral Comments:
DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review. Additional
comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit
Application.
Please refer to the Citys Storm Drainage Design Criteria as found at the City
website:
http://www.myclearwater.com/gov/depts/pwa/engin/StormwaterMgt/StormDra
inageDesignCriteria.asp
Traffic Engineering General Note(s):
Review1. Applicant shall comply with the current Multimodal Impact Fee Ordinance
and fee schedule which shall be paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy
(C.O.). The MIF amount for the new restaurant expansion with credit is
$4,515.65.
2. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional
comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit
Application. **SEE PAGE 10 ON DOCUMENT.
8/31/201631DRC_ActionAgenda
4:00 PM
Case number:FLS2016-07032 -- 2256 ST CHARLES DR
Owner(s):
PHONE: No phone, Fax: No fax, Email: No email
Applicant:Sophia Henry
2256 St Charles Drive
Clearwater, FL 33764
PHONE: (727)247-5453, Fax: No fax, Email: Sopflavi311@icloud.Com
Representative:Tim Mcalpin
Alpine Aluminim & Screen
380 Douglas Road East
Suite1
Oldsmar, FL 34667
PHONE: (813)299-1051, Fax: No fax, Email: Tmcalpin77@gmail.Com
Location:0.21 acres on the north side of St. Charles Drive approximately 200 feet west of
York Drive.
Atlas Page:309A
Zoning District:Low Medium Density Residential
Request:The Development Review Committee (DRC) is reviewing a pool enclosure for an
existing detached dwelling in the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District
for the property located at 2256 St. Charles Drive. The project has a height of 13
feet, and requests allowable flexibility from setback requirements (CDC Section 2-
203.B.).
Proposed Use:Detached Dwelling
Neighborhood
Association(s):
Clearwater Neighborhood Coalition
Morningside Meadows
Presenter:Kevin Nurnberger, Senior Planner
8/31/201632DRC_ActionAgenda
Workflow:
Review NameTask StatusStatus DateLast Name
Determination of Complete08/08/2016Nurnberger
Completeness
Solid Waste Review No Comments08/15/2016Pryor
Land Resource Review
No Comments08/18/2016Crandall
Parks and Rec Review No Comments08/19/2016Reid
Engineering Review
Comments08/19/2016Gluski
Environmental Review Comments08/19/2016Kessler
Traffic Eng Review
No Comments08/22/2016Elbo
Stormwater Review No Comments08/23/2016Bawany
Fire Review
No Review Required08/24/2016Schultz
Harbor Master Review No Review Required08/29/2016Nurnberger
Planning Review
No Comments08/29/2016Nurnberger
Route to Meeting Ready for DRC08/29/2016Nurnberger
Art Review
No Review Required08/29/2016Nurnberger
8/31/201633DRC_ActionAgenda
The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments:
Engineering ReviewPrior to the issuance of a Development Order (D.O.):
Per the plat, a 6 ft. drainage and utility easement is located along the rear of
the property line. Under no circumstances shall any structure(s) be
constructed within the 6 ft. utility easement. The City of Clearwater has
utilities located within this area.
It appears the existing swimming pool "excess pool deck" is encroaching into
the6 ft drainage and utility easement located along the rear property line.
To construct the new proposed swimming pool enclosure the excess pool
deckshall be removed to avoid conflict with the existing utilities located
within this easement.
Contractor responsible for an easement inspection by the Building
Department prior to installation of pool screen enclosure. To schedule an
inspection, please call the Building Department's 24-Hour Call in Inspection
Line at 727-562-4580. The type of inspection will be a "006" (easement
inspection). Contractor shall locate all property corners and have easement
line staked prior to (006) "Easement Inspection".
General Note:
DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional
comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit
Application. **SEE PAGE 5 ON DOCUMENT.
Environmental ReviewGeneral Notes:
DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional
comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit
Application. **SEE PAGE 0 ON DOCUMENT.
Stormwater ReviewPrior to Building Permit:
Please design stormwater roof drains (if any) to be directed towards the
street, or maintain current lot drainage
Stormwater ReviewGeneral Comments:
DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review. Additional
comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit
Application.
8/31/201634DRC_ActionAgenda
4:00 PM
Case number:LUP2016-08007 -- 606 BAYVIEW AVE
Owner(s):Our Lady Of Divine Providence House Of Prayer Foundation, Inc
711 S Bayview Ave
Clearwater, FL 33759
PHONE: (727)441-8966, Fax: No fax, Email: No email
Applicant:
606 Bayview Avenue
Clearwater, FL 33759
PHONE: (727)441-8966, Fax: No fax, Email: Bja@macfar.Com
Location:2.62 acres located generally south of Gulf to Bay Blvd, west of the Bayside Bridge,
north of Old Tampa Bay, and east of Thornton Road.
Atlas Page:301A
Zoning District:Institutional
Request:This case involves amending the Future Land Use Map designations of four
properties from Residential Low (RL), Residential Low Medium (RLM), Residential
Urban (RU), and Commercial General (CG) to Institutional (I).
Proposed Use:Places of Worship
Neighborhood
Association(s):
Clearwater Neighborhood Coalition
Presenter:Kyle Brotherton, Planner
8/31/201635DRC_ActionAgenda
Workflow:
Review NameTask StatusStatus DateLast Name
Determination of Complete08/04/2016Brotherton
Completeness
Planning Review Comments08/09/2016Brotherton
Solid Waste Review
No Comments08/15/2016Pryor
Parks and Rec Review No Comments08/19/2016Reid
Environmental Review
No Comments08/19/2016Kessler
Traffic Eng Review No Comments08/22/2016Elbo
Engineering Review
Comments08/22/2016Simpson
Stormwater Review No Comments08/24/2016Bawany
Land Resource Review
No Comments08/25/2016Anderson
Fire Review No Review Required08/28/2016Schultz
8/31/201636DRC_ActionAgenda
The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments:
Engineering ReviewNo Engineering comments at this time. Further comments will be
forthcoming at time of building permit and or Flexible Development
Application. **SEE PAGE 0 ON DOCUMENT.
Planning ReviewThis parcel also has Future Land Use Plan Designations of Commercial
General (CG) and Residential Low (RL). Please add Commercial General
(CG) and Residential Low (RL) to the Future Land Use Plan Designation
section.
Additionally, the Zoning District Commercial (C) can be added to the Zoning
District Section. **SEE PAGE 6 ON DOCUMENT.
Planning ReviewThis parcel includes just a small portion of the Future Land Use Plan
Designation of Residential Urban (RU). Please add to the list of Future Land
Use Plan Designations. **SEE PAGE 11 ON DOCUMENT.
Planning ReviewThe Countywide Plan Designation is Residential Low Medium (RLM) for this
parcel. Please update. **SEE PAGE 11 ON DOCUMENT.
Planning ReviewThis parcel appears to only have a Future Land Use Plan Designation of
Residential Urban (RU). Residential Low Medium (RLM) can be removed
from this application. Additionally, the Zoning District of Mobile Home Park
(MHP) can also be removed. **SEE PAGE 16 ON DOCUMENT.
Planning ReviewThis property appears to have only one Future Land Use Plan Designation of
Residential Urban (RU). The Future Land Use Plan Designation of
Residential Low Medium (RLM) can be removed. Additionally, the Zoning
District of Mobile Home Park (MHP) can also be removed. **SEE PAGE 1
ON DOCUMENT.
Planning ReviewThis parcel has Future Land Use Plan Designations of Commercial General
(CG) and Residential Low (RL) in addition to Residential Urban (RU) and
Residential Low Medium (RLM). Please add Commercial General (CG) and
Residential Low (RL).
Additionally, the Zoning District of Commercial (C) can also be added.
**SEE PAGE 1 ON DOCUMENT.
Planning ReviewThis parcel also contains the Future Land Use Plan Designation of
Residential Urban (RU). Please add to the section. **SEE PAGE 1 ON
DOCUMENT.
Planning ReviewThe Countywide Plan Map Category of this parcel is Residential Low Medium
(RLM). Please update. **SEE PAGE 1 ON DOCUMENT.
8/31/201637DRC_ActionAgenda
4:00 PM
Case number:REZ2016-08004 -- 606 BAYVIEW AVE
Owner(s):Our Lady Of Divine Providence House Of Prayer Foundation, Inc
711 S Bayview Ave
Clearwater, FL 33759
PHONE: (727)441-8966, Fax: No fax, Email: No email
Applicant:
711 S Bayview Ave
Clearwater, FL 33759
PHONE: (727)441-8966, Fax: No fax, Email: Bja@marfad.Com
Location:2.62 acres located generally south of Gulf to Bay Blvd, west of the Bayside Bridge,
north of Old Tampa Bay, and east of Thornton Road.
Atlas Page:301A
Zoning District:Institutional
Request:This case involves rezoning four parcels from R-4, One, Two, & Three Family
Residential (County), Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR), Mobile Home Park
(MHP), and Commercial (C) to Institutional (I).
Proposed Use:Places of Worship
Neighborhood
Association(s):
Clearwater Neighborhood Coalition
Presenter:Kyle Brotherton, Planner
8/31/201638DRC_ActionAgenda
Workflow:
Review NameTask StatusStatus DateLast Name
Determination of Complete08/04/2016Brotherton
Completeness
Planning Review Comments08/09/2016Brotherton
Solid Waste Review
No Comments08/15/2016Pryor
Parks and Rec Review No Comments08/19/2016Reid
Environmental Review
No Comments08/19/2016Kessler
Engineering Review Comments08/22/2016Simpson
Traffic Eng Review
No Comments08/22/2016Elbo
Stormwater Review No Comments08/24/2016Bawany
Land Resource Review
No Comments08/25/2016Anderson
Fire Review No Review Required08/28/2016Schultz
8/31/201639DRC_ActionAgenda
The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments:
Engineering ReviewNo Engineering comments at this time. Further comments will be
forthcoming at time of building permit and or Flexible Development
Application. **SEE PAGE 0 ON DOCUMENT.
Planning ReviewThis parcel also contains a small portion of the Future Land Use Plan
Designation Residential Urban (RU). Please add to the list. **SEE PAGE
20 ON DOCUMENT.
Planning ReviewThis parcel appears to only contain the Zoning District of Low Medium
Density Residential (LMDR). The Zoning District of Mobile Home Park
(MHP) can be removed.
Additionally, the Future Land Use Plan Designation of Residential Low
Medium (RLM) can be removed. **SEE PAGE 30 ON DOCUMENT.
Planning ReviewThis parcel appears to only contain the Zoning District of Low Medium
Density Residential (LMDR). The Zoning District of Mobile Home Park
(MHP) can be removed.
Additionally, the Future Land Use Plan Designation of Residential Low
Medium (RLM) can also be removed. **SEE PAGE 1 ON DOCUMENT.
Planning ReviewThis parcel also contains the Zoning District of Commercial (C). Please add
to the Zoning District section.
Additionally, the Future Land Use Plan Designations of Commercial General
(CG) and Residential Low (RL) should also be added to the Future Land Use
Plan Designation section. **SEE PAGE 1 ON DOCUMENT.
Planning ReviewThis parcel contains a small portion of the Future Land Use Plan Designation
of Residential Urban (RU). Please add to the Future Land Use Plan
Designation section. **SEE PAGE 1 ON DOCUMENT.
8/31/201640DRC_ActionAgenda