Loading...
04/27/2016 MUNICIPAL CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD MEETING MINUTES CITY OF CLEARWATER April 27, 2016 Present: Chair Wayne Carothers, Vice Chair Michael J. Riordon, Board Member James E. Strickland, Board Member Sue A. Johnson, Board Member Duane Schultz, Board Member Joseph A. Nycz, Board Member Robert Prast Also Present: Andy Salzman —Attorney for the Board, Matt Smith —Assistant City Attorney, Nicole Sprague —Secretary to the Board, Patricia O. Sullivan — Board Reporter The Chair called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. at City Hall, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. To provide continuity for research, items are in agenda order although not necessarily discussed in that order. The Chair outlined the procedures and stated any aggrieved party may appeal a final administrative order of the Municipal Code Enforcement Board to the Circuit Court of Pinellas County within thirty days of the execution of the order. Florida Statute 286.0105 requires any party appealing a decision of this Board to have a record of the proceedings. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 2.1. Approve minutes of the March 23, 2016 Municipal Code Enforcement Board meeting as submitted in written summation. Member Johnson moved to approve minutes of the March 23, 2016 Municipal Code Enforcement Board meeting as submitted in written summation. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. 3. CITIZENS TO BE HEARD RE ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA: 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS 4.1 Case 20-16 —Continued from March 23, 2016, Continue to May 25, 2016. Ronald Balow 1117 Pierce St. Exterior Surfaces - Fletcher Case 20-16 was continued automatically to May 25, 2016 4.2 Case 26-16 - Continue to May 25, 2016 Anthony Calicchio 24 N Highland Ave. Residential Grass Parking/Hauling Trailer— Fletcher Case 20-16 was continued automatically to May 25, 2016 Code Enforcement 2016-04-27 1 4.3 Case 27-16 George Nicovic 519 Phoenix Ave. Exterior Surfaces — Fletcher Respondent George Nicovic admitted to the violation. Inspector Vicki Fletcher provided a PowerPoint presentation. A notice of violation was issued on February 9, 2016, following the first inspection. The violation at 519 Phoenix Ave. related to exterior surfaces. Property photographs on March 14, 2016 showed peeling paint by the front door, peeling and failing paint on exterior surfaces, deteriorating window ledges, rusted carport supports and a portion of the building spray painted. Property photographs on April 15, 2016 showed faded paint and unpainted surfaces on the rear of the building. George Nicovic said he had health problems and lived on a fixed income. George Nicovic's son, Mark, said the duplex was pressure washed and painted; all repairs were made. He objected to staff trespassing to photograph the back of the building. Inspector Fletcher said she visited the property on April 25, 2016. While the front and north sides of the building were painted, the rear and south sides of the building and areas under the eaves were not. The property did not comply with Code. Member Riordon moved to find the Respondent(s) in violation of the City of Clearwater Code as referred to in the affidavit in this case. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Inspector Fletcher recommended compliance by May 12, 2016 or a fine of$150 per day be imposed. She received permission from the neighboring property to photograph the subject duplex from the backyard of the abutting property. Assistant City Attorney Matt Smith submitted composite exhibits. Member Riordon moved to enter an order requiring the Respondent to correct the violation on or before May 19, 2016. If the Respondent does not comply within the time specified, the Board may order a fine of$150 per day for each day the violation continues to exist. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. This case came before the City of Clearwater Municipal Code Enforcement Board on April 27, 2016, after due notice to the Respondent(s), and having heard testimony under oath and received evidence, the Board issues the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order: FINDINGS OF FACT Based upon the testimony and evidence received, it is evident that 1 violation exists: exterior surfaces. The Respondent(s) was/were present CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The Respondent(s) is/are in violation the City of Clearwater Code Section(s) 3-1502.113, as referred to in the Affidavit in this case. Code Enforcement 2016-04-27 2 ORDER It is the Order of the Board that the Respondent(s) shall paint the entire building to comply with said Section(s) of the Code by the deadline, May 19, 2016. The fine is $150.00 per day for each and every day the violation continues past the date set for compliance. Upon complying with said Section(s) of the Code, the Respondent(s) shall notify Inspector Vicki Fletcher, who shall inspect the property and notify the Board of compliance. If the Respondent(s) fails/fail to comply within the time specified, a certified copy of the Order imposing the fine may be recorded in the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, and once recorded shall constitute a lien against any real property owned by the Respondent(s), pursuant to Chapter 162, Florida Statutes. The Respondent may request a rehearing of the decision of the Board, in writing, and delivered to the City Clerk within 10 days of the postmark of the written order. A request for rehearing shall be based only on the ground that the decision was contrary to the evidence or that the hearing involved an error on a ruling of law which was fundamental to the board's decision. The written request for rehearing shall specify the precise reasons therefor. Upon receipt of a request for rehearing, the Board shall determine whether or not to rehear the matter; the Board will not hear oral argument or evidence when making this decision. Any aggrieved party may appeal a final Order of the Municipal Code Enforcement Board by commencing appropriate proceedings in the Circuit Court of Pinellas County within 30 days of the Order. Such an appeal shall not be a hearing de novo, but shall be limited to appellate review of the record created before the Municipal Code Enforcement Board. Florida Statute 286.0105 requires any party appealing a decision of this Board to have a record of the Board's proceedings. DONE AND ORDERED this 27th day of April 2016, at Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida. 4.4 Case 28-16 Danokaras,Vasilios & Dimitra Tre 16 S Highland Ave. Residential Grass Parking — Fletcher Alexandra Danokaras spoke on behalf of her mother, Respondent Dimitra Danokaras, who was present. Alexandra Danokaras denied the violation. Inspector Vicki Fletcher provided a PowerPoint presentation. A notice of violation was issued on February 17, 2016, following the first inspection. The violation at 16 S Highland Avenue related to grass parking. Property photographs on February 16, March 1, 9, 14, and 24, 2016 showed a vehicle parked on the grass in the front yard of the duplex. Alexandra Danokaras said tenants had parked on the grass in that spot since her parents bought the duplex in 1975. She said no parking was permitted on Highland Avenue, which had been widened to within 15 feet of the front door. She said staff was unhelpful. She said staff indicated the City needed to relocate the water meter by the front window and a new driveway could not be installed until the meter was moved. She said when she receives the property survey she ordered, she would meet with staff about installing a driveway. She said tenants of the unit facing Park Street soon would have 3 cars and also would need to park on the grass. She said tenants could not park on Park Street due to the stop sign. Code Enforcement 2016-04-27 3 Inspector Fletcher said the subject property had 2 driveways. The unit facing Highland Avenue had a driveway with room to park 2 vehicles. Vehicles could park 30 feet from the stop sign on Park Street. Discussion ensued re proposed driveway, with concern expressed re installation time. It was recommended that the property owner tell tenants not to park on the grass. Member Riordon moved to find the Respondent(s) in violation of the City of Clearwater Code as referred to in the affidavit in this case. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Inspector Fletcher recommended compliance by May 12, 2016 or a fine of$150 per day be imposed. Code Compliance Manager Terry Teunis said plans for a new driveway did not affect Code restrictions on grass parking. Alexandra Danokaras said it was not fair that tenants could not park on the grass or that she was brought before the Board. She said she told Inspector Fletcher she was working to resolve the issue. She said the tenant moved the vehicle and now parked on the grass in front of the unit facing Park Street. Discussion ensued with a recommendation that the board grant additional time as the subject property was impacted by the Highland Avenue widening and the property owner seemed confused and baffled by City requirements. It was stated that staff did a terrific job and only brought cases to the board when property owners were not cooperative. Member Riordon moved to enter an order requiring the Respondent to correct the violation on or before June 10, 2016. If the Respondent does not comply within the time specified, the Board may order a fine of$150 per day for each day the violation continues to exist. The motion was duly seconded. Members Riordon and Strickland and Chair Carothers voted "Aye"; Members Schultz, Johnson, Nycz, and Prast voted "Nay." Motion failed. Concern was expressed that the property owner continued to allow the tenant to park on the grass and needed to comply with Code. Mr. Teunis said staff had discussed the violation with the property owner since February. Alexandra Danokaras said she could not stop tenants from parking on the grass. She said tenants could not take street spaces from apartments on Park Street. Mr. Teunis said public streets did not have reserved parking spaces. Attorney Smith submitted composite exhibits. Member Nycz moved to enter an order requiring the Respondent to correct the violation on or before May 28, 2016. If the Respondent does not comply within the time specified, the Board may order a fine of$150 per day for each day the violation continues to exist. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. This case came before the City of Clearwater Municipal Code Enforcement Board on April 27, 2016, after due notice to the Respondent(s), and having heard testimony under oath and Code Enforcement 2016-04-27 4 received evidence, the Board issues the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order: FINDINGS OF FACT Based upon the testimony and evidence received, it is evident that 1 violation exists: residential grass parking. The Respondent(s) was/were present. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The Respondent(s) is/are in violation the City of Clearwater Code Section(s) 3-1407.A.5, as referred to in the Affidavit in this case. ORDER It is the Order of the Board that the Respondent(s) shall not park vehicles in the front yard to comply with said Section(s) of the Code by the deadline, May 28, 2016. One vehicle may be parked parallel and adjacent to the driveway. The fine is $150.00 per day for each and every day the violation continues past the date set for compliance. Upon complying with said Section(s) of the Code, the Respondent(s) shall notify Inspector Vicki Fletcher, who shall inspect the property and notify the Board of compliance. If the Respondent(s) fails/fail to comply within the time specified, a certified copy of the Order imposing the fine may be recorded in the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, and once recorded shall constitute a lien against any real property owned by the Respondent(s), pursuant to Chapter 162, Florida Statutes. The Respondent may request a rehearing of the decision of the Board, in writing, and delivered to the City Clerk within 10 days of the postmark of the written order. A request for rehearing shall be based only on the ground that the decision was contrary to the evidence or that the hearing involved an error on a ruling of law which was fundamental to the board's decision. The written request for rehearing shall specify the precise reasons therefor. Upon receipt of a request for rehearing, the Board shall determine whether or not to rehear the matter; the Board will not hear oral argument or evidence when making this decision. Any aggrieved party may appeal a final Order of the Municipal Code Enforcement Board by commencing appropriate proceedings in the Circuit Court of Pinellas County within 30 days of the Order. Such an appeal shall not be a hearing de novo, but shall be limited to appellate review of the record created before the Municipal Code Enforcement Board. Florida Statute 286.0105 requires any party appealing a decision of this Board to have a record of the Board's proceedings. DONE AND ORDERED this 27th day of April 2016, at Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida. 4.5 Case 29-16 Gilbert Jannelli 1343 Cleveland St. Fences &Walls/Lot Clearing/Roof Maintenance/Abandoned Bldg./Exterior Surfaces— Fletcher Code Enforcement 2016-04-27 5 Respondent Gilbert Jannelli was present. Joel Treuhaft, attorney for the Respondent, admitted to violations re roof maintenance and lot clearing but denied the property had been abandoned. Inspector Vicki Fletcher provided a PowerPoint presentation. The inspector who cited the property during last year's East Gateway sweep resigned. A new notice of violation was issued on March 1, 2016, following the first inspection. The 5 violations at 1343 Cleveland Street related to exterior surfaces, abandoned building and public health, safety or welfare nuisance, roof maintenance, accumulation of debris, and fences and walls. Property photographs on April 15, 2015 and February 21, 2016 showed mold and deteriorated paint on the roof and exterior surfaces by the front entrance, remnants of a patio cover, mold, faded and deteriorated paint on the rear of the building, mold and deteriorated paint on east side roof and exterior surfaces, black fabric covering a rear gate on the building, missing, broken, and rotten boards and collapsed sections of the wooden fence, which faced in two directions, and no supports on the collapsing chain link fence. Inspector Fletcher said the front entrance area was constantly full of trash and human waste. Attorney Treuhaft said the City had not corrected Code violations on 3 nearby lots it owned. He said homeless and vagrant patrons of the nearby soup kitchen cut through the subject property and City lots. He said cleaning the property was a constant battle with 200 to 300 pounds of refuse removed weekly. He said the property was not abandoned and was under contract to sell by August 2016. He suggested a remediation plan. Attorney Smith reviewed the Code definition for abandoned building. Inspector Fletcher said at least one window was boarded. Attorney Treuhaft said the building was not abandoned; the property owner had use of the building, stored items there, maintained it, and cut the grass every 14 days. Discussion ensued with comments that the building was not abandoned as the trash was removed weekly and the grass was cut every two weeks. Member Riordon moved to find the Respondent(s) in violation of the City of Clearwater Code as referred to in the affidavit in this case, except for the violation for abandoned building and public health, safety or welfare nuisance. The motion was duly seconded. Members Riordon, Strickland, Nycz, Prast, and Chair Carothers voted "Aye"; Members Johnson and Schultz, voted "Nay." Motion carried. Inspector Fletcher recommended compliance by May 27, 2016 or a fine of$250 per day per violation be imposed. Attorney Treuhaft requested a July 15, 2016 compliance date for the roof to provide the property owner time to work with the potential buyer re its color before painting. He said it was difficult to maintain the property due to trash left by homeless and vagrants. He said the Respondent would apply for a permit to enclose the property with temporary fencing and restrict access. He requested a June 15, 2016 compliance date for removal of all debris accumulation; the debris would continue to be cleaned weekly. Concern was expressed that the board already had given the Respondent a great consideration re the abandoned building violation. It was recommended that the property be brought into compliance. It was commented that the sale of the property could fall through. Code Enforcement 2016-04-27 6 Mr. Teunis said staff brought this nuisance property to the board due to its continuous problems over the years. The Respondent was given sufficient time to comply. The City supported the recommended compliance date for all violations. Attorney Smith submitted composite exhibits. Member Johnson moved to enter an order requiring the Respondent to correct the violation on or before May 27, 2016. If the Respondent does not comply within the time specified, the Board may order a fine of$250 per day for each day each violation continues to exist. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. This case came before the City of Clearwater Municipal Code Enforcement Board on April 27, 2016, after due notice to the Respondent(s), and having heard testimony under oath and received evidence, the Board issues the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order: FINDINGS OF FACT Based upon the testimony and evidence received, it is evident that 4 violations exist: exterior surfaces, roof maintenance, accumulation of debris, and fences and walls. The Respondent was present. CONCLUSIONS OF LAIN The Respondent is in violation the City of Clearwater Code Sections 3-803.A, 3-808, 3-808.A.1, 3-808.A.4, 3-808.A.2, 3-808.A.3, 3-808.A.5, 3-808.A.6, 3-1503.113.7, 3-1502.D.1, 3-1502.D.3, 3- 1502.D.4, 3-1502.D.5, & 3-1502.113, as referred to in the Affidavit in this case. ORDER It is the Order of the Board that the Respondent shall remove visible mildew from exterior surfaces, pressure spray and paint exterior surfaces, remove and replace rotted wood, remove all mold and peeling paint from the roof and repaint the roof, remove all trash and debris and maintain the property on a regular basis, and remove and replace all rotted and or/broken fence slats and sections of the wood and chain link fences to comply with said Sections of the Code by the deadline, May 27, 2016. The fine is $250.00 per day per violation for each and every day each violation continues past the date set for compliance. Upon complying with said Sections of the Code, the Respondent shall notify Inspector Vicki Fletcher, who shall inspect the property and notify the Board of compliance. If the Respondent fails to comply within the time specified, a certified copy of the Order imposing the fine may be recorded in the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, and once recorded shall constitute a lien against any real property owned by the Respondent, pursuant to Chapter 162, Florida Statutes. The Respondent may request a rehearing of the decision of the Board, in writing, and delivered to the City Clerk within 10 days of the postmark of the written order. A request for rehearing shall be based only on the ground that the decision was contrary to the evidence or that the hearing involved an error on a ruling of law which was fundamental to the board's decision. The written request for rehearing shall specify the precise reasons therefor. Upon receipt of a Code Enforcement 2016-04-27 7 request for rehearing, the Board shall determine whether or not to rehear the matter; the Board will not hear oral argument or evidence when making this decision. Any aggrieved party may appeal a final Order of the Municipal Code Enforcement Board by commencing appropriate proceedings in the Circuit Court of Pinellas County within 30 days of the Order. Such an appeal shall not be a hearing de novo, but shall be limited to appellate review of the record created before the Municipal Code Enforcement Board. Florida Statute 286.0105 requires any party appealing a decision of this Board to have a record of the Board's proceedings. DONE AND ORDERED this 27th day of April 2016, at Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida. 4.6 Case 30-16 Jorgo & Brunilda Borova 1574 Chateaux De Ville Ct. Abandoned Bldg./Fences/Exterior Surfaces/Door& Window Openings/Roof Maintenance —Cantrell No one was present to represent the Respondent. Inspector Jason Cantrell provided a PowerPoint presentation. Notices of violation were issued on December 17, 2015 and March 24, 2016, following the first inspection. The 5 violations at 1574 Chateaux De Ville Ct. related to abandoned building, welfare/safety nuisance, exterior surfaces, door &window openings, and roof maintenance. Property photographs on December 17, 2015, February 1 and March 24, 2016 showed the buckling roof was missing shingles and not watertight, the leaning fence had a broken post and missing and rotten boards, the fascia was deteriorating, soffit was missing, and the sliding glass rear door was boarded. A rodent was seen through a window. No one lived in the unit since June 2008. This end unit in a multi-unit building shared a roof with neighbors, who had to deal with multiple issues related to this declining property. In response to a question, Inspector Cantrell said he had no communication with the owner but was contacted by a construction company getting bids to do the work; the first bids were rejected. The building's exterior was painted. Member Riordon moved to find the Respondent(s) in violation of the City of Clearwater Code as referred to in the affidavit in this case. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Inspector Cantrell said he received a number of complaints regarding this property and vermin posed safety problems. He recommended compliance by May 18, 2016 or a fine of$250 per day per violation be imposed. Attorney for the Board Andy Salzman said the owner was responsible for the property. Attorney Smith submitted composite exhibits. Member Riordon moved to enter an order requiring the Respondent to correct the violation on or before May 18, 2016. If the Respondent does not comply within the time specified, the Board may order a fine of$250 per day for each day each violation continues to exist. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Code Enforcement 2016-04-27 8 This case came before the City of Clearwater Municipal Code Enforcement Board on April 27, 2016, after due notice to the Respondent(s), and having heard testimony under oath and received evidence, the Board issues the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order: FINDINGS OF FACT Based upon the testimony and evidence received, it is evident that 5 violations exist: abandoned building, welfare/safety nuisance, exterior surfaces, door &window openings, and roof maintenance. The Respondent(s) was/were not present. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The Respondent(s) is/are in violation the City of Clearwater Code Section(s) 3-1503.A, 3- 1503.B.1, 3-1503.113.2, 3-1503.113.3, 3-1503.113.9, 3-808.A.1, 3-808.A.2, 3-1502.113, 3-1502.C.1, & 3-1502.D.1, as referred to in the Affidavit in this case. ORDER It is the Order of the Board that the Respondent(s)shall remove or replace all rotten, broken, or missing fence sections, replace soffit and fascia, remove boards from the sliding glass door and replace the door if necessary, replace defective roof decking and shingles, remove all signs of rodent infestation and maintain property in a manner that does not create a public nuisance to comply with said Section(s) of the Code by the deadline, May 18, 2016. The fine is $250.00 per day per violation for each and every day each violation continues past the date set for compliance. Upon complying with said Section(s) of the Code, the Respondent(s) shall notify Inspector Jason Cantrell, who shall inspect the property and notify the Board of compliance. If the Respondent(s) fails/fail to comply within the time specified, a certified copy of the Order imposing the fine may be recorded in the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, and once recorded shall constitute a lien against any real property owned by the Respondent(s), pursuant to Chapter 162, Florida Statutes. The Respondent may request a rehearing of the decision of the Board, in writing, and delivered to the City Clerk within 10 days of the postmark of the written order. A request for rehearing shall be based only on the ground that the decision was contrary to the evidence or that the hearing involved an error on a ruling of law which was fundamental to the board's decision. The written request for rehearing shall specify the precise reasons therefor. Upon receipt of a request for rehearing, the Board shall determine whether or not to rehear the matter; the Board will not hear oral argument or evidence when making this decision. Any aggrieved party may appeal a final Order of the Municipal Code Enforcement Board by commencing appropriate proceedings in the Circuit Court of Pinellas County within 30 days of the Order. Such an appeal shall not be a hearing de novo, but shall be limited to appellate review of the record created before the Municipal Code Enforcement Board. Florida Statute 286.0105 requires any party appealing a decision of this Board to have a record of the Board's proceedings. DONE AND ORDERED this 27th day of April 2016, at Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida. Code Enforcement 2016-04-27 9 4.7 Case 31-16 Schlau Properties Co. 1425 Sunset Point Rd. Parking Lot Surfaces — Knight No one was present to represent the Respondent. Inspector Daniel Knight provided a PowerPoint presentation. A notice of violation was issued on February 19, 2016, following the first inspection. The violation at 1425 Sunset Point Road related to parking lot surfaces and parking space striping. Property photographs on January 8, 11, and 28, February 8 and 19, and March 14, 2016 showed the parking lot in the front, side, and rear of the property had heaved and cracked surfaces and faded striping. Property tenant Mr. Rooter parked its commercial vehicles in the lot. No repairs were made after property manager Nick Anderson said he would contact the property owner. The last time Inspector Knight contacted Mr. Anderson, he was told to do what he needed to do. Member Strickland moved to find the Respondent(s) in violation of the City of Clearwater Code as referred to in the affidavit in this case. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Inspector Knight recommended compliance by May 26, 2016 or a fine of$150 per day be imposed. Attorney Smith submitted composite exhibits. Member Strickland moved to enter an order requiring the Respondent to correct the violation on or before May 26, 2016. If the Respondent does not comply within the time specified, the Board may order a fine of$150 per day for each day the violation continues to exist. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. This case came before the City of Clearwater Municipal Code Enforcement Board on April 27, 2016, after due notice to the Respondent(s), and having heard testimony under oath and received evidence, the Board issues the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order: FINDINGS OF FACT Based upon the testimony and evidence received, it is evident that 1 violation exists: parking lot surfaces. The Respondent(s)was/were not present. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The Respondent(s) is/are in violation the City of Clearwater Code Section(s) 3-1502.K,4, 3- 1403.A, 3-1404.113, as referred to in the Affidavit in this case. ORDER It is the Order of the Board that the Respondent(s) shall obtain a permit and repair/replace the cracked and heaved parking lot surfaces with permanent all-weather paving material which is graded to drain stormwater and restripe the parking lot spaces to comply with said Section(s) of Code Enforcement 2016-04-27 10 the Code by the deadline, May 26, 2016. The fine is $150.00 per day for each and every day the violation continues past the date set for compliance. Upon complying with said Section(s) of the Code, the Respondent(s) shall notify Inspector Daniel Knight, who shall inspect the property and notify the Board of compliance. If the Respondent(s) fails/fail to comply within the time specified, a certified copy of the Order imposing the fine may be recorded in the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, and once recorded shall constitute a lien against any real property owned by the Respondent(s), pursuant to Chapter 162, Florida Statutes. The Respondent may request a rehearing of the decision of the Board, in writing, and delivered to the City Clerk within 10 days of the postmark of the written order. A request for rehearing shall be based only on the ground that the decision was contrary to the evidence or that the hearing involved an error on a ruling of law which was fundamental to the board's decision. The written request for rehearing shall specify the precise reasons therefor. Upon receipt of a request for rehearing, the Board shall determine whether or not to rehear the matter; the Board will not hear oral argument or evidence when making this decision. Any aggrieved party may appeal a final Order of the Municipal Code Enforcement Board by commencing appropriate proceedings in the Circuit Court of Pinellas County within 30 days of the Order. Such an appeal shall not be a hearing de novo, but shall be limited to appellate review of the record created before the Municipal Code Enforcement Board. Florida Statute 286.0105 requires any party appealing a decision of this Board to have a record of the Board's proceedings. DONE AND ORDERED this 27th day of April 2016, at Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida. 4.8 Case 32-16 Jon Daniels & James Fajen 1437 Carlos Ave. Fences &Walls/Roof Maintenance/Exterior Surfaces/Lot Clearing — Knight Respondent Jon Daniels said he was not properly noticed and denied the violations. Attorney Smith presented the certified letter re property violations mailed to the property address on February 23, 2016, and then returned to the City with a Post Office notation that the customer had refused to accept the letter. Attorney Salzman said the property was properly posted, which met State requirement for noticing property owners. Inspector Daniel Knight provided a PowerPoint presentation. A notice of violation was issued on February 16, 2016, following the first inspection. He will work with a contractor to abate the property's lot clearing public nuisance. The 3 remaining violations at 1437 Carlos Avenue related to roof maintenance and clean roof, exterior surfaces, and fence maintenance and appearance. Property photographs on February 10 and 11, March 9, and April 22, 2016 showed the overgrown path to the front door, vegetation growing from the roof, which was not watertight, and had deteriorated wood, stained and missing roof tiles, stained, damaged, and deteriorated eaves and soffits, and the fence was in disrepair, with missing slats, gaping holes, and standalone posts. Photographs showed the house was in a well maintained neighborhood. Inspector Knight said he took photographs of the property's rear from a neighboring property. He initially responded to a complaint of odor and concern re resident's well being. When he Code Enforcement 2016-04-27 11 spoke with the property owner during his first inspection, Mr. Daniels had said he would not fix anything. Mr. Daniels objected to the procedure, stating he did not receive a certified letter and the property's co-owner was not notified. He said 9 days ago he received a pink slip indicating there was mail from the City; he returned it to the postal worker because the name of co-owner James Fajen was on the slip. Attorney Salzman said the property's owners were notified based on information available to the City. The co-owner's knowledge of today's proceedings did not impact a board decision. Mr. Daniels said he did not know he had to repair the roof, exterior surfaces, and fence until he read the posting. He said the City had posted 3 notices previously, which were threatening gestures and did not mention the roof, exterior surfaces, or fence, but only the lot clearing. He thought that violation had been cured. He said the Inspector came to his door in February reporting cat odor. Member Riordon moved to find the Respondent(s) in violation of the City of Clearwater Code as referred to in the affidavit in this case. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Inspector Knight recommended compliance by May 27 or a fine of$250 per day per violation be imposed. During his first conversation with Mr. Daniels, the property owner had shut down before he could review all of the violations. Previous cases re this property's violations were closed when the inspector resigned. Mr. Daniels said he had little equity in the house and the co-owner would have to make repairs. It was commented that Mr. Daniels was listed as an owner of the property, was responsible for repairs, and he should contact the other property owner. Mr. Daniels said the situation was grim. He said previous inspectors knew the fabric of the neighborhood. He said he lost 80% of the equity in his house in 2008 and 7 Section 8 houses were in the neighborhood. It was stated that the neighborhood looked good while Mr. Daniels' house resembled a jungle. Attorney Smith submitted composite exhibits. Member Riordon moved to enter an order requiring the Respondent to correct the violation on or before June 20, 2016. If the Respondent does not comply within the time specified, the Board may order a fine of$250 per day for each day each violation continues to exist. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. This case came before the City of Clearwater Municipal Code Enforcement Board on April 27, 2016, after due notice to the Respondent(s), and having heard testimony under oath and received evidence, the Board issues the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order: FINDINGS OF FACT Code Enforcement 2016-04-27 12 Based upon the testimony and evidence received, it is evident that 3 violations exist: roof maintenance and clean roof, exterior surfaces, and fence maintenance and appearance. Respondent Daniels was present. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The Respondent(s) is/are in violation the City of Clearwater Code Section(s) 3-808, 3-808.A.4, 3-808.A.2, 3-808.A.5, 3-808.A.6, 3-1502.13.1, 3-1502.D.3, 3-1502.13, 3-1503.13.10, 3-1503.13.7, 3-1503.13.8, 3-1503.13.5, 3-1503.A, 3-1503.13.1, &3-1503.13.9, as referred to in the Affidavit in this case. ORDER It is the Order of the Board that the Respondent(s) shall clean staining on the roof, repair/ replace damaged or missing roofing tiles so that the roof is safe, secure, and watertight, clear away trash, debris, and/or vegetation, repair/replace all damaged and/or deteriorated wood on the soffits and eaves so they are weather durable and cleaned of staining, and repair/replace rotten boards on the fence, securely attach support posts to the ground and fence stringers to the posts, and maintain the fence in a uniform, secure and safe condition or remove the fencing completely from the property to comply with said Section(s) of the Code by the deadline, June 20, 2016. The fine is $250 per day per violation for each and every day each violation continues past the date set for compliance. Upon complying with said Section(s) of the Code, the Respondent(s) shall notify Inspector Daniel Knight, who shall inspect the property and notify the Board of compliance. If the Respondent(s) fails/fail to comply within the time specified, a certified copy of the Order imposing the fine may be recorded in the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, and once recorded shall constitute a lien against any real property owned by the Respondent(s), pursuant to Chapter 162, Florida Statutes. The Respondent may request a rehearing of the decision of the Board, in writing, and delivered to the City Clerk within 10 days of the postmark of the written order. A request for rehearing shall be based only on the ground that the decision was contrary to the evidence or that the hearing involved an error on a ruling of law which was fundamental to the board's decision. The written request for rehearing shall specify the precise reasons therefor. Upon receipt of a request for rehearing, the Board shall determine whether or not to rehear the matter; the Board will not hear oral argument or evidence when making this decision. Any aggrieved party may appeal a final Order of the Municipal Code Enforcement Board by commencing appropriate proceedings in the Circuit Court of Pinellas County within 30 days of the Order. Such an appeal shall not be a hearing de novo, but shall be limited to appellate review of the record created before the Municipal Code Enforcement Board. Florida Statute 286.0105 requires any party appealing a decision of this Board to have a record of the Board's proceedings. DONE AND ORDERED this 27th day of April 2016, at Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida. 4.9 Case 33-16 109 Kenwood Ave Trust 109 Kenwood Ave. Parking Lot Surfaces — Devol Code Enforcement 2016-04-27 13 Property owner Clark Seabloom admitted to the violation. Inspector Diane Devol provided a PowerPoint presentation. Notices of violation were issued on May 16 and December 15, 2015, following the first inspection. Some violations were repaired. The remaining violation at 109 Kenwood Avenue related to parking lot surfaces. Property photographs on June 30, November 30, 2015 and February 29, 2016 showed the parking lot had a large pot hole by the street, deteriorated edges, and no striping for spaces. Inspector Devol said the property owner had said he would repair the parking lot in February but work was not done. Mr. Seabloom said he wanted to repair the parking lot himself but City paperwork required repairs to be permitted and done by a contractor. In spite of his intentions to complete the work by February, estimated costs of up to $25,000 were much higher than he anticipated and he could not afford to move forward with the project. He said he had hired a contractor and applied for a permit to resurface the lot and stripe it. He said the project would be divided into 3 phases over 3 months due to his ability to pay one-third of the repair cost each month. Inspector Devol recommended compliance by May 27, 2016 or a fine of$250 per day be imposed. She said had she been in recent contact with the property owner and knew of his plan, she may have delayed bringing the case to the board or reduced the recommended fine. Member Riordon moved to find the Respondent(s) in violation of the City of Clearwater Code as referred to in the affidavit in this case. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Mr. Seabloom apologized to Inspector Devol for not maintaining contact. He said he was numbed by the project's cost and had not wanted to confront it. He said he would stay in touch. Attorney Smith submitted composite exhibits. Member Strickland moved to enter an order requiring the Respondent to correct the violation on or before June 27, 2016. If the Respondent does not comply within the time specified, the Board may order a fine of$100 per day for each day the violation continues to exist. The motion was duly seconded. Members Riordon, Strickland, Schultz, Nycz, Prast and Chair Carothers voted "Aye"; Member Johnson voted "Nay." Motion carried. This case came before the City of Clearwater Municipal Code Enforcement Board on April 27, 2016, after due notice to the Respondent(s), and having heard testimony under oath and received evidence, the Board issues the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order: FINDINGS OF FACT Based upon the testimony and evidence received, it is evident that 1 violation exists: parking lot surfaces. The Respondent(s) was/were present. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The Respondent(s) is/are in violation the City of Clearwater Code Section(s) 3-1403.A & 3- 1502.K.4, as referred to in the Affidavit in this case. Code Enforcement 2016-04-27 14 ORDER It is the Order of the Board that the Respondent(s) shall repair or repave all areas where the asphalt is cracked or worn away with a permanent all-weather paving material which is graded to drain stormwater to comply with said Section(s) of the Code by the deadline, June 27, 2016. The fine is $100.00 per day for each and every day the violation continues past the date set for compliance. Upon complying with said Section(s) of the Code, the Respondent(s) shall notify Inspector Diane Devol, who shall inspect the property and notify the Board of compliance. If the Respondent(s) fails/fail to comply within the time specified, a certified copy of the Order imposing the fine may be recorded in the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, and once recorded shall constitute a lien against any real property owned by the Respondent(s), pursuant to Chapter 162, Florida Statutes. The Respondent may request a rehearing of the decision of the Board, in writing, and delivered to the City Clerk within 10 days of the postmark of the written order. A request for rehearing shall be based only on the ground that the decision was contrary to the evidence or that the hearing involved an error on a ruling of law which was fundamental to the board's decision. The written request for rehearing shall specify the precise reasons therefor. Upon receipt of a request for rehearing, the Board shall determine whether or not to rehear the matter; the Board will not hear oral argument or evidence when making this decision. Any aggrieved party may appeal a final Order of the Municipal Code Enforcement Board by commencing appropriate proceedings in the Circuit Court of Pinellas County within 30 days of the Order. Such an appeal shall not be a hearing de novo, but shall be limited to appellate review of the record created before the Municipal Code Enforcement Board. Florida Statute 286.0105 requires any party appealing a decision of this Board to have a record of the Board's proceedings. DONE AND ORDERED this 27th day of April 2016, at Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida. 4.10 Case 34-16 Dror Peled 2706 Landmark Dr. Residential Grass Parking— Harris No one was present to represent the Respondent. Inspector Christin Harris provided a PowerPoint presentation. A notice of violation was issued on February 29, 2016 following the first inspection. The violation at 2706 Landmark Drive related to residential grass parking. The property was cited 13 times for grass parking in the last 9 years. Property photographs on March 8, 10, and 14, 2016 showed vehicles parked in the yard, right-of-way, and straddling the right-of-way and sidewalk. A property photograph on April 25, 2016 showed a vehicle parked on the grass behind a fence. Inspector Harris advised the tenants it was illegal to park on the grass and spoke by phone with the property owner and son, who were not cooperative. Member Riordon moved to find the Respondent(s) in violation of the City of Clearwater Code as referred to in the affidavit in this case. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Code Enforcement 2016-04-27 15 Inspector Harris recommended compliance by April 28, 2016 or a fine of$150 per day be imposed. She said a boat was parked parallel and adjacent to the driveway. Discussion ensued regarding the property's history of multiple grass parking violations. It was felt the property owners were at fault if they were unaware of today's hearing. Attorney Smith submitted composite exhibits. Member Johnson moved to enter an order requiring the Respondent to correct the violation on or before April 28, 2016. If the Respondent does not comply within the time specified, the Board may order a fine of$150 per day for each day the violation continues to exist. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. This case came before the City of Clearwater Municipal Code Enforcement Board on April 27, 2016, after due notice to the Respondent(s), and having heard testimony under oath and received evidence, the Board issues the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order: FINDINGS OF FACT Based upon the testimony and evidence received, it is evident that 1 violation exists: residential parking on the grass. The Respondent(s) was/were not present. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The Respondent(s) is/are in violation the City of Clearwater Code Section(s) 3-1403.113.1, 3- 1407.A.2, & 3-1407.A.5, as referred to in the Affidavit in this case. ORDER It is the Order of the Board that the Respondent(s) shall remove all parked vehicles in the front, side or rear yards and right-of-way to comply with said Section(s) of the Code by the deadline, April 28, 2016. One vehicle may be parked parallel and adjacent to the driveway. The fine is $150.00 per day for each and every day the violation continues past the date set for compliance. Upon complying with said Section(s) of the Code, the Respondent(s) shall notify Inspector Christin Harris, who shall inspect the property and notify the Board of compliance. If the Respondent(s) fails/fail to comply within the time specified, a certified copy of the Order imposing the fine may be recorded in the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, and once recorded shall constitute a lien against any real property owned by the Respondent(s), pursuant to Chapter 162, Florida Statutes. The Respondent may request a rehearing of the decision of the Board, in writing, and delivered to the City Clerk within 10 days of the postmark of the written order. A request for rehearing shall be based only on the ground that the decision was contrary to the evidence or that the hearing involved an error on a ruling of law which was fundamental to the board's decision. The written request for rehearing shall specify the precise reasons therefor. Upon receipt of a request for rehearing, the Board shall determine whether or not to rehear the matter; the Board will not hear oral argument or evidence when making this decision. Code Enforcement 2016-04-27 16 Any aggrieved party may appeal a final Order of the Municipal Code Enforcement Board by commencing appropriate proceedings in the Circuit Court of Pinellas County within 30 days of the Order. Such an appeal shall not be a hearing de novo, but shall be limited to appellate review of the record created before the Municipal Code Enforcement Board. Florida Statute 286.0105 requires any party appealing a decision of this Board to have a record of the Board's proceedings. DONE AND ORDERED this 27th day of April 2016, at Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida. 4.11 Case 35-16 Countryside Medical Offices 2665 SR 580 Fences &Walls — Harris No one was present to represent the Respondent. Inspector Christin Harris provided a PowerPoint presentation. A notice of violation was issued on February 18, 2016, following the first inspection. The violation at 2665 SR 580 related to fencing. Property photographs on December 15, 2015 showed the rear leaning fence had rotted boards and loose slats. Property photographs on February 5, 2016 showed a portion of the dumpster fence was taller than 6 feet and had trash caught in chicken wire that filled the gap below the fence. The fenced dumpster and chicken wire abutted the neighboring condominium complex's swimming pool area. Property photographs on March 17 and 18, 2016 showed the fence had deteriorated further, was heaving at the bottom, had exposed nails, and additional fallen slats by the dumpster. A property photograph on March 28, 2016 showed fencing by the dumpster was replaced with a 6-foot non-opaque portion of fence that did not comply with Code as it was not uniform in appearance with the existing opaque style fence. Repairs to the remainder of the fence were not made. In response to a question, Inspector Harris and Mr. Teunis reviewed techniques to determine the height of a fence. Member Schultz moved to find the Respondent(s) in violation of the City of Clearwater Code as referred to in the affidavit in this case. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Albert Brylewski, resident of the abutting condominium complex, said the medical offices' dog eared fence was constantly falling over. He said he had spoken with Dr. Marks to no avail. He said condominium residents should not have to deal with the unsightly fence every day and requested relief. He recommended the fence be replaced. A large contingent of condominium residents were present in support of fence repairs. Mr. Teunis said fence violations were an ongoing situation at this property. He said the property owner made many minor repairs without solving major fence problems, which resulted in additional complaints. He said if the property owner removed the wooden fence, it would have to be replaced with a wall or vinyl fence. Inspector Harris recommended compliance by May 4, 2016 or a fine of$150 per day be imposed. Attorney Smith submitted composite exhibits. Code Enforcement 2016-04-27 17 Member Prast moved to enter an order requiring the Respondent to correct the violation on or before May 4, 2016. If the Respondent does not comply within the time specified, the Board may order a fine of$250 per day for each day the violation continues to exist. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. This case came before the City of Clearwater Municipal Code Enforcement Board on April 27, 2016, after due notice to the Respondent(s), and having heard testimony under oath and received evidence, the Board issues the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order: FINDINGS OF FACT Based upon the testimony and evidence received, it is evident that 1 violation exists: unmaintained fence. The Respondent(s) was/were not present. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The Respondent(s) is/are in violation the City of Clearwater Code Section(s) 3-808, 3-808.A.1, 3-808.A.4, 3-808.A.2, 3-808.A.3, 3-808.A.5, 3-808.A.6, & 3-804.113, as referred to in the Affidavit in this case. ORDER It is the Order of the Board that the Respondent(s)shall repair or replace the fence so there are no missing slats and no rotted, loose, leaning, or sagging boards and repair or replace the fence around the dumpster enclosure to be uniform in appearance and match the existing opaque style fence to comply with said Section(s) of the Code by the deadline, May 4, 2016. The fine is $250.00 per day for each and every day the violation continues past the date set for compliance. Upon complying with said Section(s) of the Code, the Respondent(s) shall notify Inspector Christin Harris, who shall inspect the property and notify the Board of compliance. If the Respondent(s) fails/fail to comply within the time specified, a certified copy of the Order imposing the fine may be recorded in the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, and once recorded shall constitute a lien against any real property owned by the Respondent(s), pursuant to Chapter 162, Florida Statutes. The Respondent may request a rehearing of the decision of the Board, in writing, and delivered to the City Clerk within 10 days of the postmark of the written order. A request for rehearing shall be based only on the ground that the decision was contrary to the evidence or that the hearing involved an error on a ruling of law which was fundamental to the board's decision. The written request for rehearing shall specify the precise reasons therefor. Upon receipt of a request for rehearing, the Board shall determine whether or not to rehear the matter; the Board will not hear oral argument or evidence when making this decision. Any aggrieved party may appeal a final Order of the Municipal Code Enforcement Board by commencing appropriate proceedings in the Circuit Court of Pinellas County within 30 days of the Order. Such an appeal shall not be a hearing de novo, but shall be limited to appellate review of the record created before the Municipal Code Enforcement Board. Florida Statute 286.0105 requires any party appealing a decision of this Board to have a record of the Board's proceedings. Code Enforcement 2016-04-27 18 DONE AND ORDERED this 27th day of April 2016, at Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida. 4.12 Case 36-16 SR-580 Professional Office Centre Association Inc. 2655 SR 580 Common Area Fences &Walls - Harris No one was present to represent the Respondent. Inspector Christin Harris provided a PowerPoint presentation. A notice of violation was issued on February 18, 2016, following the first inspection. The violation at 2655 SR 580 Common Area related to fencing. The two professional offices shared a dumpster. A property photograph on February 5, 2016 showed the fence surrounding the dumpster had broken slats, was taller than 6 feet, and had trash slipping through the chicken wire covering the ground level gap. Property photographs on March 17 and 21, 2016 showed the dumpster fence had broken slats, slats leaning on the fence, a slat on the ground, and trash slipping through the fence onto the condominium property next door. A property photograph on March 28, 2016 showed the dumpster fencing was replaced with a 6-foot non-opaque portion of fence that did not comply with Code as it was not uniform in appearance with the existing opaque style fence. Only that section of fence violated Code. Inspector Harris said Dr. Melilli was more cooperative than Dr. Marks next door Member Riordon moved to find the Respondent(s) in violation of the City of Clearwater Code as referred to in the affidavit in this case. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Albert Brylewski, resident of the abutting condominium complex, said there had been a constant back and forth between his condominium complex and the medical offices regarding the fence's poor condition. Inspector Harris recommended compliance by May 4, 2016 or a fine of$150 per day be imposed. Attorney Smith submitted composite exhibits. Member Riordon moved to enter an order requiring the Respondent to correct the violation on or before May 4, 2016. If the Respondent does not comply within the time specified, the Board may order a fine of$150 per day for each day the violation continues to exist. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. This case came before the City of Clearwater Municipal Code Enforcement Board on April 27, 2016, after due notice to the Respondent(s), and having heard testimony under oath and received evidence, the Board issues the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order: FINDINGS OF FACT Based upon the testimony and evidence received, it is evident that 1 violation exists: fencing. The Respondent(s) was/were not present. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Code Enforcement 2016-04-27 19 The Respondent(s) is/are in violation the City of Clearwater Code Section(s) 3-808, 3-808.A.6, & 3-804.113, as referred to in the Affidavit in this case. ORDER It is the Order of the Board that the Respondent(s) shall replace the non-opaque portion of fence so that the fence around the dumpster enclosure is uniform in appearance and matches the existing opaque style fence to comply with said Section(s) of the Code by the deadline, May 4, 2016. The fine is $150.00 per day for each and every day the violation continues past the date set for compliance. Upon complying with said Section(s) of the Code, the Respondent(s) shall notify Inspector Christin Harris, who shall inspect the property and notify the Board of compliance. If the Respondent(s) fails/fail to comply within the time specified, a certified copy of the Order imposing the fine may be recorded in the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, and once recorded shall constitute a lien against any real property owned by the Respondent(s), pursuant to Chapter 162, Florida Statutes. The Respondent may request a rehearing of the decision of the Board, in writing, and delivered to the City Clerk within 10 days of the postmark of the written order. A request for rehearing shall be based only on the ground that the decision was contrary to the evidence or that the hearing involved an error on a ruling of law which was fundamental to the board's decision. The written request for rehearing shall specify the precise reasons therefor. Upon receipt of a request for rehearing, the Board shall determine whether or not to rehear the matter; the Board will not hear oral argument or evidence when making this decision. Any aggrieved party may appeal a final Order of the Municipal Code Enforcement Board by commencing appropriate proceedings in the Circuit Court of Pinellas County within 30 days of the Order. Such an appeal shall not be a hearing de novo, but shall be limited to appellate review of the record created before the Municipal Code Enforcement Board. Florida Statute 286.0105 requires any party appealing a decision of this Board to have a record of the Board's proceedings. DONE AND ORDERED this 27th day of April 2016, at Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida. 5. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 5.1 Case 27-14 Affidavit of Non-Compliance Gilbert Jannelli & Barbara Suslak 23837 US Highway 19 Public Nuisance Condition/Abandoned Bldg. - Phillips Joel Treuhaft, attorney for the Gilbert Jannelli, said the Community Development Board had granted the request by this property's tenant for a change in usage and the tenant was working on the change. Attorney Smith said the Municipal Code Enforcement Board had given the Respondent a year to comply, which had not occurred. Inspector Phillips was not provided a copy of the rental contract, as requested. Code Enforcement 2016-04-27 20 5.2 Case 103-15 Affidavit of Non-Compliance William Clarida 911 Druid Rd. Parking Lot Surfaces —Alston 5.3 Case 16-16 Affidavit of Non-Compliance Remzi Dalip 2135 Burnice Dr. Exterior Storage/Construction Material Storage—Cantrell 5.4 Case 40-09 Affidavit of Compliance Nestor Lira 59 Acacia St. Public Health, Safety or Welfare Nuisance— Brown 5.5 Case 59-15 Affidavit of Compliance SEDKIILLC 1990 Sunset Point Rd Signage—Weaver 5.6 Case 13-16 Affidavit of Compliance 1504 Garden Inc. 1504 N Garden Ave. Off-Street Parking/Parking Lot Surfaces -Weaver 5.7 Case 16-16 Affidavit of Compliance -Withdrawn Remzi Dalip 2135 Burnice Dr. Exterior Storage/Construction Material Storage - Cantrell 5.8 Case 24-16 Affidavit of Compliance Frank & Isabelle Blainey 3172 Wessex Way Fences &Walls/Public Health, Safety or Welfare Nuisance— Harris Member Schultz moved to accept the Affidavits of Compliance for Case 40-09, 59-15, 13-16, and 24-16 and accept the Affidavits of Non-Compliance and issue the Orders imposing fines for Cases 27-14, 103-15 and 16-16. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. 6. NEW BUSINESS: None 7. NUISANCE ABATEMENT LIEN FILINGS: COMMUNITY PARTNERS IN REVITALIZATION INC 1143 HOWARD ST PNU2015-01771 22-29-15-13662-004-0020 $341.65 CLODYS A MENANCHO 1003 VINE AVE PNU2015-01835 10-29-15-45000-006-0030 $320.00 Code Enforcement 2016-04-27 21 AVRAHAM BENSIMON 309 S PEGASUS AVE 13- 29 -15- 82602- 002 -0030 PNU2016 -00074 $507.54 Member Schultz moved to accept the Nuisance Abatement Lien filings. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. 8. ADJOURN The meeting adjourned at 3:45 p.m. Attest: Chair, M al Code Enforcement Board Se r- tary to the oard Code Enforcement 2016 -04 -27 22