08/25/1993 MUNICIPAL CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD
August 25, 1993
Members present:
William Murray, Chairman
D. Wayne Wyatt, Vice-Chairman
Stephen D. Swanberg
Louise C. Riley
E.J. Robinson
Peg Rogers
Absent:
Louise Bolton (unexcused)
Also present:
Miles Lance, Assistant City Attorney
Robert Santa Lucia, Attorney for the Board
Mary K. Diana, Secretary for the Board
Gwen J. Legters, Recording Secretary
In order to provide continuity for research, the items will be listed in agenda order although not necessarily discussed in that order.
The meeting was called to order by the Chairman at 3:00 p.m. in the Commission Meeting Room in City Hall. He outlined the procedures and advised any aggrieved party may appeal a final
administrative order of the Municipal Code Enforcement Board to the Circuit Court of Pinellas County. Any such appeal must be filed within thirty (30) days of the execution of the order
to be appealed. He noted that Florida Statute 286.0105 requires any party appealing a decision of this Board to have a record of the proceedings to support such an appeal.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Steven Watts, attorney representing the property owners and/or lessees in Case Nos. 61-93, 6293, 63-93, 6493, 6593, 66-93, 67-93, 68-93, 69-93, 73-93 and 76-93, agreed to make a combined
presentation for the above referenced cases due to all addressing the same violation. He did not agree to the violations, stating the incorrect reference section was given for those
properties zoned CR-28. Readings of the affidavits were waived and the Board Secretary verified she had the affidavits on file and indicated all addressed outdoor displays of merchandise.
Discussion ensued regarding the CB (beach commercial) and CR-28 (resort commercial) zoning districts on the beach. Mr. Richter indicated there is no provision in the code to allow for
outdoor displays, storage or sales on Clearwater Beach in either district. He said the general citation issued was applicable to all the properties cited; however, the reference sections
were not applicable in all cases.
Attorney Lance recommended either amending the reference section for those properties zoned CR-
28 or dismissing those cases and reciting the properties under the appropriate zoning district if necessary. Attorney Watts felt the cases incorrectly referenced should be dismissed.
Member Riley pointed out the code regarding outdoor displays is being reviewed by the Code Enforcement Task Force. Staff indicated they are not aware of any proposed changes at this
time regarding this issue.
Case No. 61-93 Stanislaw Budzinski
201 S Gulfview Boulevard
(Land Development Code)
Vicki Niemiller stated ownership was verified through the property appraiser's office and a notice of violation was sent by both regular and certified mail and the certified mail receipt
was returned signed. The property was first inspected on May 20, 1993 and a notice of violation was sent with a May 27, 1993 compliance date. The property was reinspected on June 1,
1993 and was in compliance. An outside display was again observed on June 21, 1993 and a notice of recurring violation was sent. The property was inspected this morning and was still
in violation. She submitted Exhibit H, photographs of the property taken May 28, June 24, August 11 and August 25, 1993.
This property is in the resort commercial zoning district and was referenced as beach commercial. Staff recommended withdrawing Case No. 61-93 to recite under the appropriate zoning
district if necessary.
Case No. 62-93 Speros & Joan Frangedis
437 S Gulfview Boulevard
(Land Development Code)
Continued from 8/11/93
Vicki Niemiller stated ownership was verified through the property appraiser's office and a notice of violation was sent by regular and certified mail and the notice was returned unclaimed.
The property was first inspected on May 20, 1993 and a notice of violation was sent with a compliance date of May 27, 1993. The property was reinspected on June 1, 1993 and was found
to be in compliance. She said outdoor display was again observed on June 21, 1993 and a notice of recurring violation was sent on June 23, 1993. The property was reinspected this morning
and is still in violation. She submitted City Exhibit A, photographs of the property.
This property is in the resort commercial zoning district and was referenced as beach commercial. Staff recommended withdrawing Case No. 62-93 to recite under the appropriate zoning
district if necessary.
Member Swanberg moved to withdraw Cases Nos. 61-93 and 62-93. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
Case No. 63-93 Helen A Gelep
444 Mandalay Avenue
(Land Development Code)
Continued from 8/11/93
Vicki Niemiller stated ownership was verified through the property appraiser's office and a notice of
violation was sent by both regular and certified mail and the certified mail receipt was returned signed. The property was first inspected on May 19, 1993 and a notice of violation
was sent with a May 26, 1993 compliance date. The property was reinspected on May 27, 1993 and the merchandise was still outside. The property was reinspected this morning and the
violation still exists. She submitted City Exhibit B, photographs of the property.
Member Wyatt moved that, concerning Case No. 63-93, regarding violation of section 40.004(2) of the Clearwater City Code at 444 Mandalay Avenue a/k/a Clearwater Beach Park, Lot 84, the
Municipal Code Enforcement Board has heard testimony at the Municipal Code Enforcement Board hearing held the 25th day of August, 1993, and based on the evidence, the Municipal Code
Enforcement Board enters the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order.
The Findings of Fact are: after hearing testimony of Vicki Niemiller, Code Inspector and John Richter, Code Enforcement Manager, and Attorney Steven Watts, representing the property
owner, and viewing the evidence, submitted City Exhibit B, photographs of the subject property, it is evident there exists an activity and/or object that is not allowed as a permitted
or conditional use in the zone assigned to the subject property, specifically, outside display of merchandise (reference sections 40.364 permitted uses and 40.365, conditional uses)
at 444 Mandalay Avenue. It is further evident this condition still exists.
The Conclusions of Law are: Helen A Gelep is in violation of Section 40.004(2) of the Clearwater City Code.
It is the Order of this Board that Helen A Gelep shall comply with Section 40.004(2) of the Code of the City of Clearwater by August 30, 1993. If she does not comply within the time
specified, the Board may order her to pay a fine of $150.00 per day for each day the violation continues to exist past the compliance due date. If Helen A Gelep does not comply within
the time specified, a certified copy of the Order imposing the fine may be recorded in the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, and once recorded shall constitute a lien against
any real or personal property owned by the violator pursuant to Chapter 162, Florida Statutes. If the violation concerns real property, the recording of a certified copy of this Order
shall constitute notice to any subsequent purchasers, successors in interest or assigns of the violation and the findings in this Order shall be binding upon any subsequent purchasers,
successors in interest or assigns of the real property where the violation exists. Upon complying, Helen A Gelep shall notify Vicki Niemiller, Code Enforcement Inspector, the City Official
who shall inspect the property and notify the Board of compliance. Should the violation reoccur, the Board has the authority to impose the fine at that time without a subsequent hearing.
Should a dispute arise concerning compliance, either party may request a further hearing before the Board. Any aggrieved party may petition the Board to reconsider or rehear any Board
order resulting from a Public Hearing. A Petition for Rehearing must be made in writing and filed with the Board Secretary no later than thirty days after the execution of the order
and prior to the filing of any appeal. Upon receipt of the Petition, the Board will consider whether or not to reconsider or rehear the case. The Board will not hear oral argument
or evidence in determining whether to grant the Petition to Reconsider or Rehear. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
Case No. 64-93 Antonios Markopoulos
100 Coronado Drive
(Land Development Code)
Continued from 8/11/93
Vicki Niemiller stated ownership was verified through the property appraiser's office and the notice of violation was sent by both regular and certified mail with the certified receipt
returned signed. The property was first inspected on May 21, 1993 and a notice of violation was sent with a May 28, 1993 compliance date. The property was reinspected on June 21, 1993
and merchandise was still displayed outdoors. A notice of recurring violation was sent on June 23, 1993. The property was inspected this morning and the violation no longer exists.
She submitted City Exhibit C, photographs of the property.
This property is in the resort commercial zoning district and was referenced as beach commercial. Staff recommended withdrawing Case No. 64-93 to recite under the appropriate zoning
district if necessary.
Case No. 65-93 Antonios Markopoulos
100 Coronado Drive, 108 B
(Land Development Code)
Continued from 8/11/93
Vicki Niemiller stated ownership was verified through the property appraiser's office and a notice of violation was sent by both regular and certified mail and the certified mail receipt
was returned signed. The property was first inspected on May 21, 1993 and a notice of violation was sent with a May 28, 1993 compliance date. The property was reinspected on June 1,
1993 and the property was in compliance. The outdoor display was again observed on June 21, 1993 and a notice of recurring violation was sent on June 23, 1993. The property was inspected
this morning and the property is still in violation. She submitted City Exhibit D, photographs of the property.
This property is in the resort commercial zoning district and was referenced as beach commercial. Staff recommended withdrawing Case No. 65-93 to recite under the appropriate zoning
district if necessary.
Member Swanberg moved to withdraw Cases Nos. 64-93 and 65-93. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
Case No. 66-93 Kay Soful
403 Mandalay Avenue, B
(Land Development Code)
Continued from 8/11/93
Vicki Niemiller stated ownership was verified through the property appraiser's office and the notice of violation was sent both regular and certified mail and the certified mail receipt
was returned signed. The property was first inspected on May 28, 1993 and a notice of violation was sent with a June 4, 1993 compliance date. The property was reinspected on June 24,
1993 and the merchandise was still outside. The property was inspected this morning and the violation no longer exists. She submitted City Exhibit E, photographs of the property.
Member Riley moved that, concerning Case No. 66-93, regarding violation of section 40.004(2) of the
Clearwater City Code at 403 Mandalay Avenue, B, a/k/a Barbour Morrow Sub, Block A, Lots 17-20 & 34, the Municipal Code Enforcement Board has heard testimony at the Municipal Code Enforcement
Board hearing held the 25th day of August, 1993, and based on the evidence, the Municipal Code Enforcement Board enters the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order.
The Findings of Fact are: after hearing testimony of Vicki Niemiller, Code Inspector, John Richter, Code Enforcement Manager, and Attorney Steven Watts, representing the property owner,
and viewing the evidence, submitted City Exhibit E, photographs of the subject property, it is evident there existed an activity and/or object that is not allowed as a permitted or conditional
use in the zone assigned to the subject property, specifically, outdoor display of merchandise (reference sections 40.364 permitted uses and 40.365 conditional uses) at 403 Mandalay
Avenue, B; this condition was corrected and recurred. It is further evident the condition was corrected prior to this hearing.
The Conclusions of Law are: Kay Soful was in violation of Section 40.004(2) of the Clearwater City Code.
It is the Order of this Board that Kay Soful shall comply with Section 40.004(2) of the Code of the City of Clearwater. If she repeats the violation, the Board may order her to pay
a fine of $150.00 per day for each day the violation continues to exist after she is notified of the repeat violation. Should the violation reoccur, the Board has the authority to
impose the fine at that time without a subsequent hearing. Should a dispute arise concerning compliance, either party may request a further hearing before the Board. Any aggrieved
party may petition the Board to reconsider or rehear any Board order resulting from a Public Hearing. A Petition for Rehearing must be made in writing and filed with the Board Secretary
no later than thirty days after the execution of the order and prior to the filing of any appeal. Upon receipt of the Petition, the Board will consider whether or not to reconsider
or rehear the case. The Board will not hear oral argument or evidence in determining whether to grant the Petition to Reconsider or Rehear. The motion was duly seconded and carried
unanimously.
Case No. 67-93 Kay Soful
399 Mandalay Avenue
(Land Development Code)
Continued from 8/11/93
Vicki Niemiller stated ownership was verified through the property appraiser's office and a notice of violation was sent by both regular and certified mail and the certified mail receipt
was returned signed. The property was inspected on May 19, 1993 and a notice of violation was sent with a May 26, 1993 compliance date. It was reinspected on May 27, 1993 and the property
was in compliance. The outdoor display was again observed on June 21, 1993 and a notice of recurring violation was sent on June 23, 1993. The property was inspected this morning and
was in compliance. She submitted City Exhibit F, photographs of the property.
Member Riley moved that, concerning Case No. 67-93, regarding violation of section 40.004(2) of the Clearwater City Code at 399 Mandalay Avenue, a/k/a Barbour Morrow Sub, Block A, Lots
17-20 & 34, the Municipal Code Enforcement Board has heard testimony at the Municipal Code Enforcement Board hearing held the 25th day of August, 1993, and based on the evidence, the
Municipal Code Enforcement Board enters the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order.
The Findings of Fact are: after hearing testimony of Vicki Niemiller, Code Inspector, John Richter, Code Enforcement Manager, and Attorney Steven Watts, representing the property owner,
and viewing the evidence, submitted City Exhibit F, photographs of the subject property, it is evident there
existed an activity and/or object that is not allowed as a permitted or conditional use in the zone assigned to subject property, specifically an outdoor display of merchandise, (reference
sections 40.364 permitted uses and 40.365 conditional uses) at 399 Mandalay Avenue, this condition was corrected and recurred. It is further evident that the condition was corrected
prior to this hearing.
The Conclusions of Law are: Kay Soful was in violation of Section 40.004(2) of the Clearwater City Code.
It is the Order of this Board that Kay Soful shall comply with Section 40.004(2) of the Code of the City of Clearwater. If she repeats the violation, the Board may order her to pay
a fine of $150.00 per day for each day the violation continues to exist after she is notified of the repeat violation. Should the violation reoccur, the Board has the authority to
impose the fine at that time without a subsequent hearing. Should a dispute arise concerning compliance, either party may request a further hearing before the Board. Any aggrieved
party may petition the Board to reconsider or rehear any Board order resulting from a Public Hearing. A Petition for Rehearing must be made in writing and filed with the Board Secretary
no later than thirty days after the execution of the order and prior to the filing of any appeal. Upon receipt of the Petition, the Board will consider whether or not to reconsider
or rehear the case. The Board will not hear oral argument or evidence in determining whether to grant the Petition to Reconsider or Rehear. The motion was duly seconded and carried
unanimously.
Case No. 68-93 Kay Soful
403 Mandalay Avenue, A
(Land Development Code)
Continued from 8/11/93
Vicki Niemiller stated ownership was verified through the property appraiser's office and the notice of violation was sent by both regular and certified mail and the certified mail receipt
was returned signed. The property was first inspected on May 20, 1993 and a notice of violation was sent with a May 27, 1993 compliance date. The property was reinspected on May 27,
1993 and was in compliance. An outside display was again observed on June 21, 1993 and a notice of recurring violation was sent on June 25, 1993. The property was inspected this morning
and was in compliance. She submitted City Exhibit G, photographs of the property.
Member Riley moved that, concerning Case No. 68-93, regarding violation of section 40.004(2) of the Clearwater City Code at 403 Mandalay Avenue, A, a/k/a Barbour Morrow Sub, Block A,
Lots 17-20 & 34, the Municipal Code Enforcement Board has heard testimony at the Municipal Code Enforcement Board hearing held the 25th day of August, 1993, and based on the evidence,
the Municipal Code Enforcement Board enters the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order.
The Findings of Fact are: after hearing testimony of Vicki Niemiller, Code Inspector, John Richter, Code Enforcement Manager, and Attorney Steven Watts, representing the property owner,
and viewing the evidence, submitted City Exhibit G, photographs of the subject property, it is evident there existed an activity and/or object that is not allowed as a permitted or conditional
use in the zone assigned to subject property, specifically, outside display of merchandise (reference sections 40.364 permitted uses and 40.365 conditional uses) at 403 Mandalay Avenue,
A; this condition was corrected and recurred. It is further evident the condition was corrected prior to this hearing.
The Conclusions of Law are: Kay Soful was in violation of Section 40.004(2) of the Clearwater City Code.
It is the Order of this Board that Kay Soful shall comply with Section 40.004(2) of the Code of the City
of Clearwater. If she repeats the violation, the Board may order her to pay a fine of $150.00 per day for each day the violation continues to exist after she is notified of the repeat
violation. Should the violation reoccur, the Board has the authority to impose the fine at that time without a subsequent hearing. Should a dispute arise concerning compliance, either
party may request a further hearing before the Board. Any aggrieved party may petition the Board to reconsider or rehear any Board order resulting from a Public Hearing. A Petition
for Rehearing must be made in writing and filed with the Board Secretary no later than thirty days after the execution of the order and prior to the filing of any appeal. Upon receipt
of the Petition, the Board will consider whether or not to reconsider or rehear the case. The Board will not hear oral argument or evidence in determining whether to grant the Petition
to Reconsider or Rehear. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
Case No. 69-93 Alex & Mary Gelep
448 Mandalay Avenue
(Land Development Code)
Vicki Niemiller stated the ownership was verified through the property appraiser's office and a notice of violation was sent both regular and certified mail and the certified mail receipt
was returned signed. The property was first inspected on May 19, 1993 and a notice of violation was with a May 26, 1993 compliance date. The property was reinspected on May 27, 1993
and was no longer in violation. An outside display was again observed on June 24, 1993 and a notice of recurring violation was sent. The property was inspected this morning and is
still in violation. She submitted City Exhibit I, photographs of the property.
In response to a question, Ms. Niemiller stated the threshold is considered to be the dividing line between the inside and the outside of a business establishment.
Discussion ensued regarding what constitutes outside display and a question was raised if soft drink vending machines are allowed. Mr. Richter said an ordinance is being drafted to
address outdoor vending machines. A question was raised if the property owner owned the vending machine on the property, and Attorney Watts indicated he did not know.
Member Wyatt moved that, concerning Case No. 69-93, regarding violation of section 40.004(2) of the Clearwater City Code at 448 Mandalay Avenue a/k/a Clearwater Beach Park, Lots 80-83,
the Municipal Code Enforcement Board has heard testimony at the Municipal Code Enforcement Board hearing held the 25th day of August, 1993, and based on the evidence, the Municipal Code
Enforcement Board enters the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order.
The Findings of Fact are: after hearing testimony of Vicki Niemiller, Code Inspector and John Richter, Code Enforcement Manager, and Attorney Steven Watts, representing the property
owner, and viewing the evidence, submitted City Exhibit I, photographs of the subject property, it is evident there exists an activity and/or object that is not allowed as a permitted
or conditional use in the zone assigned to the subject property, specifically, outdoor display of merchandise (reference sections 40.364 permitted uses and 40.365 conditional uses) at
448 Mandalay Avenue. It is further evident this condition still exists.
The Conclusions of Law are: Alex & Mary Gelep are in violation of Section 40.004(2) of the Clearwater City Code.
It is the Order of this Board that Alex & Mary Gelep shall comply with Section 40.004(2) of the Code
of the City of Clearwater by August 30, 1993. If they do not comply within the time specified, the Board may order them to pay a fine of $150.00 per day for each day the violation
continues to exist past the compliance due date. If Alex & Mary Gelep do not comply within the time specified, a certified copy of the Order imposing the fine may be recorded in the
Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, and once recorded shall constitute a lien against any real or personal property owned by the violator pursuant to Chapter 162, Florida Statutes.
If the violation concerns real property, the recording of a certified copy of this Order shall constitute notice to any subsequent purchasers, successors in interest or assigns of the
violation and the findings in this Order shall be binding upon any subsequent purchasers, successors in interest or assigns of the real property where the violation exists. Upon complying,
Alex & Mary Gelep shall notify Vicki Niemiller, Code Enforcement Inspector, the City Official who shall inspect the property and notify the Board of compliance. Should the violation
reoccur, the Board has the authority to impose the fine at that time without a subsequent hearing. Should a dispute arise concerning compliance, either party may request a further hearing
before the Board. Any aggrieved party may petition the Board to reconsider or rehear any Board order resulting from a Public Hearing. A Petition for Rehearing must be made in writing
and filed with the Board Secretary no later than thirty days after the execution of the order and prior to the filing of any appeal. Upon receipt of the Petition, the Board will consider
whether or not to reconsider or rehear the case. The Board will not hear oral argument or evidence in determining whether to grant the Petition to Reconsider or Rehear. The motion
was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
Attorney Watts stated zoning ordinances deal with uses and felt his clients displaying merchandise outside did not violate any zoning ordinances. Mr. Richter said the zoning code treats
uses of property as (1) permitted uses, (2) conditional uses or (3) prohibited uses. He said the code does not list all the prohibited uses in a specific zoning district. He said
if uses are not listed as permitted or conditional, they are prohibited.
Case No. 70-93 Joseph Caraco & F Iocolano
432 Poinsettia Avenue, #1
(Land Development Code)
No one was present to represent the property owners.
Vicki Niemiller, Code Enforcement Inspector, stated ownership of the property was verified through the property appraiser's office. The notice of violation was sent by regular and certified
mail and the certified mail receipt was returned signed. The property was inspected on May 20, 1993 with a May 27, 1993 compliance date. The property was reinspected on June 1, 1993
and no merchandise was outside. An outside display was again observed on June 24, 1993 and a notice of recurring violation was sent. The property was inspected this morning and the
building is now vacant; there is no longer a business on the property. She submitted City Exhibit A, photographs of the property.
Ms. Niemiller said, even though the business is gone, finding the property owner in violation would give the City leverage if the violation is repeated on the property. Concern was
expressed regarding a new business owner not knowing of the violation and it was felt a provision could be put in the lease. Ms. Niemiller said she has spoken to the property owner
and he knows he is responsible for his tenants.
Discussion ensued regarding the procedures of issuing citations to property owners and lessees and Mr. Richter agreed going after the property owner, in addition to the tenant, would
provide leverage to the City in liening the property if the violations recur.
Member Wyatt moved that, concerning Case No. 70-93, regarding violation of section 40.004(2) of the Clearwater City Code at 432 Poinsettia Avenue, #1, a/k/a Barbour Morrow Sub, Block
A, Lot 41, the Municipal Code Enforcement Board has heard testimony at the Municipal Code Enforcement Board hearing held the 25th day of August, 1993, and based on the evidence, the
Municipal Code Enforcement Board enters the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order.
The Findings of Fact are: after hearing testimony of Vicki Niemiller, Code Inspector, and John Richter, Code Enforcement Manager, and viewing the evidence, exhibits submitted, City
Exhibit A, photographs of the subject property, it is evident there existed an activity and/or objects not permitted as conditional uses in the zone assigned to the subject property,
specifically, outdoor display of merchandise (reference sections 40.364 permitted uses and 40.365 conditional uses) at 432 Poinsettia Avenue, #1; this condition was corrected and recurred.
It is further evident the condition was corrected prior to this hearing.
The Conclusions of Law are: Joseph Caraco & F Iocolano were in violation of Section 40.004(2) of the Clearwater City Code.
It is the Order of this Board that Joseph Caraco & F Iocolano shall comply with Section 40.004(2) of the Code of the City of Clearwater. If Joseph Caraco & F Iocolano repeat the violation,
the Board may order them to pay a fine of $150.00 per day for each day the violation continues to exist after they are notified of the repeat violation. Should the violation reoccur,
the Board has the authority to impose the fine at that time without a subsequent hearing. Should a dispute arise concerning compliance, either party may request a further hearing before
the Board. Any aggrieved party may petition the Board to reconsider or rehear any Board order resulting from a Public Hearing. A Petition for Rehearing must be made in writing and
filed with the Board Secretary no later than thirty days after the execution of the order and prior to the filing of any appeal. Upon receipt of the Petition, the Board will consider
whether or not to reconsider or rehear the case. The Board will not hear oral argument or evidence in determining whether to grant the Petition to Reconsider or Rehear. The motion
was duly seconded and upon the vote being taken, Messrs. Murray, Wyatt, Swanberg and Robinson voted "aye"; Ms. Rogers voted "nay". (Member Riley had left the meeting). Motion carried.
Case No. 71-93 Marguerite S. Flowers
111 Orangeview Avenue
(Land Development Code)
No one was present to represent the property owner.
Rick Rosa, Code Enforcement Inspector, stated the citation is the result of a complaint received by staff on July 9, 1991, that a motor home was parked in the setback. A notice was
issued to Mrs. Flowers and she moved the motor home to the side of the house on September 26, 1991. A written complaint was received in February of this year the motor home was again
parked in the driveway. Mr. Rosa said he spoke to Mrs. Flowers and she moved the motor home back to the side of the house. On June 28, 1993, staff observed the motor home parked parallel
to the frontage of the property. A notice of recurring violation was issued. He submitted City Exhibit A, a photograph of the property. The adjoining neighbor had erected a fence
to prevent parking of the vehicle at the side of the house. A question was raised if the fence was erected by the neighbor to keep the vehicle from being parked on their property and
Mr. Rosa felt this was the case; however, he said he had not
surveyed the property line. A question was raised if there was anywhere on the property the vehicle could be parked and be in compliance, and Mr. Rosa indicated it did not appear there
was. Mr. Rosa said the violation still exists today.
In response to a question, Mr. Rosa responded a recreational vehicle can be parked on the property for 24 hours for the purposes of cleaning, unloading, loading, etc.
Member Rogers moved that, concerning Case No. 71-93, regarding violation of section 42.34(9)(b)3 of the Clearwater City Code at 111 Orangeview Avenue, a/k/a Russell's Sub, Block 1, Lot
4, the Municipal Code Enforcement Board has heard testimony at the Municipal Code Enforcement Board hearing held the 25th day of August, 1993, and based on the evidence, the Municipal
Code Enforcement Board enters the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order.
The Findings of Fact, are: after hearing testimony of Rick Rosa, Code Inspector, and viewing the evidence, submitted City Exhibit A, a photograph of the subject property, it is evident
a recreational vehicle is parked or stored in a residential setback area at 111 Orangeview Avenue, this condition was corrected prior and has recurred. It is further evident this condition
still exists.
The Conclusions of Law are: Marguerite S. Flowers is in violation of code section 42.34(9)(b)3 of the Clearwater City Code.
It is the Order of this Board that Marguerite S. Flowers shall comply with Section 42.34(9)(b)3 of the Code of the City of Clearwater by August 30, 1993. If she does not comply, or
repeats the violation, the Board may order her to pay a fine of $25.00 per day for each day the violation continues to exist past the compliance due date. If Marguerite S. Flowers
does not comply within the time specified, a certified copy of the Order imposing the fine may be recorded in the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, and once recorded shall
constitute a lien against any real or personal property owned by the violator pursuant to Chapter 162, Florida Statutes. If the violation concerns real property, the recording of a
certified copy of this Order shall constitute notice to any subsequent purchasers, successors in interest or assigns of the violation and the findings in this Order shall be binding
upon any subsequent purchasers, successors in interest or assigns of the real property where the violation exists. Upon complying, Marguerite S. Flowers shall notify Rick Rosa, Code
Enforcement Inspector, the City Official who shall inspect the property and notify the Board of compliance. Should the violation reoccur, the Board has the authority to impose the fine
at that time without a subsequent hearing. The motion was duly seconded and upon the vote being taken, Ms. Rogers, Messrs. Murray, Wyatt, Swanberg and Robinson voted "aye"; Member Riley
was not present. Motion carried.
Case No. 72-93 William & Kathryn KcKnight
710 Drew Street
(Land Development Code)
In a memo dated August 17, 1993, Vicki Niemiller stated the violation was corrected prior to the public hearing and requested this case be withdrawn.
Member Riley moved to withdraw Case No. 72-93. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
Case No. 73-93 Mary & Alexander Dervech
460 Mandalay Avenue
(Land Development Code)
Vicki Niemiller stated the ownership of the property was verified through the property appraiser's office. The notice of violation was sent by both regular and certified mail and the
certified mail receipt was returned signed. The property was first inspected on May 19, 1993 and the notice of violation was mailed with a May 26, 1993 compliance date. The property
was reinspected on May 27, 1993 and the property was in compliance. An outside display was again observed on July 9, 1993 and a notice of recurring violation was sent. The property
was inspected this morning and is still in violation. She submitted City Exhibit J, photographs of the property.
Member Wyatt moved that, concerning Case No. 73-93, regarding violation of section 40.004(2) of the Clearwater City Code at 460 Mandalay Avenue a/k/a Clearwater Beach Park, Lots 74-77,
the Municipal Code Enforcement Board has heard testimony at the Municipal Code Enforcement Board hearing held the 25th day of August, 1993, and based on the evidence, the Municipal Code
Enforcement Board enters the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order.
The Findings of Fact are: after hearing testimony of Vicki Niemiller, Code Inspector and John Richter, Code Enforcement Manager, and Attorney Steven Watts, representing the property
owner, and viewing the evidence, submitted City Exhibit J, photographs of the subject property, it is evident there exits an activity and/or objects that are not allowed as a permitted
or conditional use in the zone assigned to the subject property, specifically outdoor displays (reference sections 40.364 permitted uses and 40.365 conditional uses) at 460 Mandalay
Avenue; this condition was corrected and recurred. It is further evident this condition still exists.
The Conclusions of Law are: Mary and Alexander Dervech are in violation of Section 40.004(2) of the Clearwater City Code.
It is the Order of this Board that Mary & Alexander Dervech shall comply with Section 40.004(2) of the Code of the City of Clearwater by August 30, 1993. If they do not comply within
the time specified, the Board may order them to pay a fine of $150.00 per day for each day the violation continues to exist past the compliance due date. If Mary & Alexander Dervech
do not comply within the time specified, a certified copy of the Order imposing the fine may be recorded in the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, and once recorded shall constitute
a lien against any real or personal property owned by the violator pursuant to Chapter 162, Florida Statutes. If the violation concerns real property, the recording of a certified copy
of this Order shall constitute notice to any subsequent purchasers, successors in interest or assigns of the violation and the findings in this Order shall be binding upon any subsequent
purchasers, successors in interest or assigns of the real property where the violation exists. Upon complying, Mary & Alexander Dervech shall notify Vicki Niemiller, Code Enforcement
Inspector, the City Official who shall inspect the property and notify the Board of compliance. Should the violation reoccur, the Board has the authority to impose the fine at that
time without a subsequent hearing. Should a dispute arise concerning compliance, either party may request a further hearing before the Board. Any aggrieved party may petition the Board
to reconsider or rehear any Board order resulting from a Public Hearing. A Petition for Rehearing must be made in writing and filed with the Board Secretary no later than thirty days
after the execution of the order and prior to the filing of any appeal. Upon receipt of the Petition, the Board will consider whether or not to
reconsider or rehear the case. The Board will not hear oral argument or evidence in determining whether to grant the Petition to Reconsider or Rehear. The motion was duly seconded
and carried unanimously.
Case No. 74-93 C T Corp Syst / K-Mart Corp
2130 Gulf To Bay Boulevard
(Land Development Code)
Request to continue - Sign variance requested
Geri Doherty, Inspection Specialist, asked for this case to be continued due to a sign variance having been requested.
Member Wyatt moved to continue Case No. 74-93 to the meeting of September 8, 1993. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
Case No. 75-93 Homer Realty, Inc,
389 Mandalay Avenue
(Land Development Code)
No one was present to represent the property owner.
Vicki Niemiller stated property ownership was verified through the property appraiser's office. The notice of violation was sent by both regular and certified mail. The certified mail
receipt was returned signed. The property was inspected on June 21, 1993 with a June 28, 1993 compliance date. The property was reinspected on July 2, 1993 and the merchandise was
still outside. She said this is not a recurring violation; they have never complied. The property was inspected this morning and is still in violation. She submitted Exhibit A, photographs
of the property. In response to a question, Ms. Niemiller responded she sent a notice to the business owner in addition to the property owner. She said she did not have any personal
contact with Mr. Homer or the business owner. In response to a question, she responded this property is in the Beach Commercial zone.
Member Wyatt moved that concerning Case No. 75-93, regarding violation of Section 40.004(2) of the Clearwater City Code on property located at 389 Mandalay Avenue, a/k/a Barbour Morrow
Sub, Block A, Lots 23-25, the Municipal Code Enforcement Board has heard testimony at the Municipal Code Enforcement Board hearing held the 25th day of August, 1993, and based on the
evidence, the Municipal Code Enforcement Board enters the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order.
The Findings of Fact are: after hearing testimony of Vicki Niemiller, Code Inspector, and John Richter, Code Enforcement Manager, and viewing the evidence, submitted City Exhibit A,
photographs of the subject property, it is there exists an activity and/or object that is not allowed as a permitted or conditional use n the zone assigned to the subject property, specifically
outside display of merchandise (reference sections 40.364 and 40.365) at 389 Mandalay Avenue. It is further evident this condition still exists.
The Conclusions of Law are: Homer Realty, Inc, John W. Homer, R.A., is in violation of Section 40.004(2) of the Clearwater City Code.
It is the Order of this Board that Homer Realty, Inc, John W. Homer, R.A. shall comply with Section 40.004(2) of the Code of the City of Clearwater by August 30, 1993. If he does not
comply within the time specified, the Board may order him to pay a fine of $150.00 per day for each day the violation continues to exist past the compliance due date. If Homer Realty,
Inc, John W. Homer, R.A. does not comply within the time specified, a certified copy of the Order imposing the fine may be recorded in the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida,
and once recorded shall constitute a lien against any real or personal property owned by the violator pursuant to Chapter 162, Florida Statutes. If the violation concerns real property,
the recording of a certified copy of this Order shall constitute notice to any subsequent purchasers, successors in interest or assigns of the violation and the findings in this Order
shall be binding upon any subsequent purchasers, successors in interest or assigns of the real property where the violation exists. Upon complying, Homer Realty, Inc, John W. Homer
shall notify Vicki Niemiller, the City Official who shall inspect the property and notify the Board of compliance. Should the violation reoccur, the Board has the authority to impose
the fine at that time without a subsequent hearing. Should a dispute arise concerning compliance, either party may request a further hearing before the Board. Any aggrieved party may
petition the Board to reconsider or rehear any Board order resulting from a Public Hearing. A Petition for Rehearing must be made in writing and filed with the Board Secretary no later
than thirty days after the execution of the order and prior to the filing of any appeal. Upon receipt of the Petition, the Board will consider whether or not to reconsider or rehear
the case. The Board will not hear oral argument or evidence in determining whether to grant the Petition to Reconsider or Rehear. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
Case No. 76-93 Homer Realty, Inc,
393 Mandalay Avenue
(Land Development Code)
Vicki Niemiller stated ownership of the property was verified through the property appraiser's office and the notice of violation was sent by both regular and certified mail and the
certified mail receipt was returned signed. The property was inspected on July 9, 1993 and a notice of violation was sent with a July 16, 1993 compliance date. The property was reinspected
on July 26, 1993 and the merchandise was still outside. The property was inspected this morning and is still in violation. She submitted City Exhibit K, photographs of the property.
Member Wyatt moved that concerning Case No. 76-93, regarding violation of Section 40.004(2) of the Clearwater City Code on property located at 393 Mandalay Avenue, a/k/a Barbour Morrow
Sub, Block A, Lots 23-25, the Municipal Code Enforcement Board has heard testimony at the Municipal Code Enforcement Board hearing held the 25th day of August, 1993, and based on the
evidence, the Municipal Code Enforcement Board enters the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order.
The Findings of Fact are: after hearing testimony of Vicki Niemiller, Code Inspector, John Richter, Code Enforcement Manager, and Attorney Steven Watts, attorney representing the property
owner, and viewing the evidence, submitted City Exhibit K, photographs of the subject property, it is evident there exists an activity and/or object that is not allowed as a permitted
or conditional use in the zone assigned to the subject property, specifically, outdoor display of merchandise (reference sections 40.364 permitted uses and 40.365 conditional uses) at
393 Mandalay Avenue. It is further evident
this condition still exists.
The Conclusions of Law are: Homer Realty, Inc, John W. Homer, R.A., is in violation of Section 40.004(2) of the Clearwater City Code.
It is the Order of this Board that Homer Realty, Inc, John W. Homer, R.A. shall comply with Section 40.004(2) of the Code of the City of Clearwater by August 30, 1993. If he does not
comply within the time specified, the Board may order him to pay a fine of $150.00 per day for each day the violation continues to exist past the compliance due date. If Homer Realty,
Inc, John W. Homer, R.A. does not comply within the time specified, a certified copy of the Order imposing the fine may be recorded in the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida,
and once recorded shall constitute a lien against any real or personal property owned by the violator pursuant to Chapter 162, Florida Statutes. If the violation concerns real property,
the recording of a certified copy of this Order shall constitute notice to any subsequent purchasers, successors in interest or assigns of the violation and the findings in this Order
shall be binding upon any subsequent purchasers, successors in interest or assigns of the real property where the violation exists. Upon complying, Homer Realty, Inc, John W. Homer
shall notify Vicki Niemiller, the City Official who shall inspect the property and notify the Board of compliance. Should the violation reoccur, the Board has the authority to impose
the fine at that time without a subsequent hearing. Should a dispute arise concerning compliance, either party may request a further hearing before the Board. Any aggrieved party may
petition the Board to reconsider or rehear any Board order resulting from a Public Hearing. A Petition for Rehearing must be made in writing and filed with the Board Secretary no later
than thirty days after the execution of the order and prior to the filing of any appeal. Upon receipt of the Petition, the Board will consider whether or not to reconsider or rehear
the case. The Board will not hear oral argument or evidence in determining whether to grant the Petition to Reconsider or Rehear. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
Case No. 77-93 Homer Realty, Inc,
387.5 Mandalay Avenue
(Land Development Code)
No one was present to represent the property owner.
Vicki Niemiller stated the ownership of the property was verified through the property appraiser's office. The notice of violation was sent by both regular and certified mail and the
certified mail receipt was returned signed. The property was inspected on June 24, 1993 and the notice of violation was sent with a July 1, 1993 compliance date. The property was reinspected
on July 2, 1993 and the signs were still there. The property was inspected this morning and the violation still exists. She submitted City Exhibit A, photographs of the property.
Member Swanberg moved that concerning Case No. 77-93, regarding violation of Section 44.57(7) of the Clearwater City Code on property located at 387.5 Mandalay Avenue, a/k/a Barbour
Morrow Sub, Block A, Lots 23-25, the Municipal Code Enforcement Board has heard testimony at the Municipal Code Enforcement Board hearing held the 25th day of August, 1993, and based
on the evidence, the Municipal Code Enforcement Board enters the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order.
The Findings of Fact are: after hearing testimony of Vicki Niemiller, Code Inspector, and viewing the evidence, submitted City Exhibit A, photographs of the subject property, it is
evident there exists one or more portable signs, where portable signs are prohibited, specifically, two outside portable signs, at 387.5 Mandalay Avenue. It is further evident this
condition still exists.
The Conclusions of Law are: Homer Realty, Inc, John W. Homer, R.A., is in violation of Section 44.57(7) of the Clearwater City Code.
It is the Order of this Board that Homer Realty, Inc, John W. Homer, R.A. shall comply with Section 44.57(7) of the Code of the City of Clearwater by August 30, 1993. If he does not
comply within the time specified, the Board may order him to pay a fine of $25.00 per day for each day the violation continues to exist past the compliance due date. If Homer Realty,
Inc, John W. Homer, R.A. does not comply within the time specified, a certified copy of the Order imposing the fine may be recorded in the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida,
and once recorded shall constitute a lien against any real or personal property owned by the violator pursuant to Chapter 162, Florida Statutes. If the violation concerns real property,
the recording of a certified copy of this Order shall constitute notice to any subsequent purchasers, successors in interest or assigns of the violation and the findings in this Order
shall be binding upon any subsequent purchasers, successors in interest or assigns of the real property where the violation exists. Upon complying, Homer Realty, Inc, John W. Homer
shall notify Vicki Niemiller, the City Official who shall inspect the property and notify the Board of compliance. Should the violation reoccur, the Board has the authority to impose
the fine at that time without a subsequent hearing. Should a dispute arise concerning compliance, either party may request a further hearing before the Board. Any aggrieved party may
petition the Board to reconsider or rehear any Board order resulting from a Public Hearing. A Petition for Rehearing must be made in writing and filed with the Board Secretary no later
than thirty days after the execution of the order and prior to the filing of any appeal. Upon receipt of the Petition, the Board will consider whether or not to reconsider or rehear
the case. The Board will not hear oral argument or evidence in determining whether to grant the Petition to Reconsider or Rehear. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
The meeting was recessed from 5:00 to 5:08 p.m.
Case No. 78-93 Stavros and Panagio Demosthenis
1765 Gulf to Bay Boulevard
(Land Development Code)
No one was present to represent the property owner.
Vernon Todd, attorney representing the lessee, and Aspasia Papadopoulos, lessee, agreed to the violation. Ms. Papadopoulos stated the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) is
doing improvements to Keene Road at Gulf to Bay Boulevard. She has not seen their plans and does not know how this will affect the sign. She said she was told the FDOT project is to
start in August or September of this year.
In response to questions, it was indicated the sign belongs to the property owner, not Ms. Papadopoulos. The property owner is away in Greece and cannot be reached. Attorney Todd
questioned if adequate notice of the hearing was given. The Board Attorney indicated as long as an attempt was made by staff to notify the property owner there was sufficient notice.
Member Riley felt the case should be continued as it is not known how the business owners will be affected by the DOT project. Chairman Wyatt questioned if the business owner had legal
rights to make improvements on the property and it was indicated there was no provision in the lease.
There was discussion whether proper notice had been given and the Board Secretary said the certified mail receipt had been returned signed. Attorney Lance pointed out that Inspector
Zetterberg met directly with the owner on February 9, 1993 and informed him of the violation.
Charles Zetterberg, Code Enforcement Inspector, stated when he met with the property owner in February, he explained the violations and informed him of the compliance due date in writing.
In response to a question, he indicated the violation has existed since April 1992.
Mr. Richter stated the compliance date was October 13, 1993. He felt allowing the existing sign would competitively impact those who have complied with the sign code. He said it would
be appropriate to request a sign variance. In response to a question, it was indicated the majority of surrounding businesses are in compliance.
Attorney Todd felt the sign was not displeasing and requested delaying any action until the owner has returned from Greece to address the issue.
Member Rogers moved that, concerning Case No. 78-93, regarding violation of Section 44.51(4)(e)1.b & 1.c of the Clearwater City Code on property located at 1765 Gulf to Bay Boulevard,
a/k/a Suburb Beautiful, Block B. Lots 1, 2, 5 & 7, the Municipal Code Enforcement Board has heard testimony at the Municipal Code Enforcement Board hearing held the 25th day of August,
1993, and based on the evidence, the Municipal Code Enforcement Board enters the following findings of fact, conclusions of law, and order.
The Findings of Fact are: after hearing testimony of Charles Zetterberg, Code Enforcement Inspector, Vernon Todd, attorney representing the lessee and Aspasia Papadopoulos, the lessee
who admitted to the violation, and viewing the evidence, it is evident there exists signage that exceeds the 64 square footage and 20 foot height allowances at 1765 Gulf to Bay Boulevard.
It is further evident this condition still exists.
The Conclusions of Law are: Stavros and Panagio Demosthenis, property owners, and Aspasia Papadopoulos, lessee, are in violation of Section 44.51(4)(e)1.b and 1.c of the Clearwater
City Code.
It is the Order of this Board that Stavros and Panagio Demosthenis and Aspasia Papadopoulos shall comply with Section 44.51(4)(e)1.b and 1.c of the Code of the City of Clearwater within
30 days (September 25, 1993). If the violators do not comply within the time specified, the Board may order them to pay a fine of $25.00 per day for each day the violation continues
to exist past the compliance due date. If Stavros and Panagio Demosthenis do not comply within the time specified, a certified copy of the Order imposing the fine may be recorded in
the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, and once recorded shall constitute a lien against any real or personal property owned by the violator pursuant to Chapter 162, Florida
Statutes. If the violation concerns real property, the recording of a certified copy of this Order shall constitute notice to any subsequent purchasers,
successors in interest or assigns of the violation and the findings in this Order shall be binding upon any subsequent purchasers, successors in interest or assigns of the real property
where the violation exists. Upon complying, Stavros Demosthenis shall notify Charles Zetterberg, the City Official, who shall inspect the property and notify the Board of compliance.
Should the violation reoccur, the Board has the authority to impose the fine at that time without a subsequent hearing. Should a dispute arise concerning compliance, either party may
request a further hearing before the Board. Any aggrieved party may petition the Board to reconsider or rehear any Board order resulting from a Public Hearing. A Petition for Rehearing
must be made in writing and filed with the Board Secretary no later than thirty days after the execution of the order and prior to the filing of any appeal. Upon receipt of the Petition,
the Board will consider whether or not to reconsider or rehear the case. The Board will not hear oral argument or evidence in determining whether to grant the Petition to Reconsider
or Rehear. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
Member Riley left the meeting at 5:47 p.m.
Case No. 79-93 Mehmet E. Bulca
1457 Sandy Lane
(Public Nuisance)
No one was present to represent the property owner and the appeal was denied.
Rick Rosa, Code Enforcement Inspector, indicated if any illegal vehicles remain, they will be towed.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Case No. 39-92 Adriano Battaglini
406 Venetian Drive
(Land Development Code)
Affidavit of Compliance
Case No. 59-92 William L Robinson
1410 Taft Avenue
(Unsafe Building)
Affidavit of Compliance
Case No. 73-92 Paul S. Hodges
302 Vine Avenue
(Unsafe Building)
Affidavit of Compliance
Case No. 52-93 B J E Inc. / Staack
483 Mandalay Avenue
(Land Development Code)
Affidavit of Compliance
Member Robinson moved to accept the Affidavits of Compliance concerning Cases Nos. 39-92, 5992, 73-92 and 52-93. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
Case No. 61-92 James A and Mary L. Wooding
601 North Garden Avenue
(Unsafe Building)
Affidavit of Non-Compliance
Member Swanberg moved to accept the Affidavit of Non-Compliance and initiate the order imposing the fine concerning Case No. 61-93. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
OTHER BOARD ACTION OR DISCUSSION
Member Swanberg questioned if certain advertisement signs such as those displayed in the windows of Kentucky Fried Chicken are allowed. Mr. Richter is to research and report to the
Board.
Member Rogers questioned if attorneys are required to be sworn in and Mr. Santa Lucia responded only when testifying.
MINUTES - Meeting of July 28, 1993
Member Swanberg moved to approve the minutes of July 28, 1993, as submitted. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
ADJOURN - The meeting was adjourned at 6:45 p.m.
Chairman
MUNICIPAL CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD
ATTEST:
Secretary