Loading...
02/24/2016 MUNICIPAL CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD MEETING MINUTES CITY OF CLEARWATER February 24, 2016 Present: Chair Wayne Carothers, Vice Chair Michael J. Riordon, Board Member James E. Strickland, Board Member Sue A. Johnson, Board Member Joseph A. Nycz, Board Member Robert Prast Absent: Board Member Duane Schultz, Also Present: Andy Salzman —Attorney for the Board, Matt Smith —Assistant City Attorney, Nicole Sprague —Secretary to the Board, Patricia O. Sullivan — Board Reporter The Chair called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. at City Hall, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. To provide continuity for research, items are in agenda order although not necessarily discussed in that order. The Chair outlined the procedures and stated any aggrieved party may appeal a final administrative order of the Municipal Code Enforcement Board to the Circuit Court of Pinellas County within thirty days of the execution of the order. Florida Statute 286.0105 requires any party appealing a decision of this Board to have a record of the proceedings. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 2.1. Approve minutes of the January 27, 2016 Municipal Code Enforcement Board meeting as submitted in written summation. Member Riordon moved to approve minutes of the January 27, 2016 Municipal Code Enforcement Board meeting as submitted in written summation. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. 3. CITIZENS TO BE HEARD RE ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA: None. 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS 4.1 Case 13-16 1504 Garden Inc. 1504 N Garden Ave. Off-Street Parking/Parking Lot Surfaces -Weaver No one was present to represent the Respondent. Inspector Mary Jo Weaver provided a PowerPoint presentation. Notices of violation were issued on December 22, 2015, following the first inspection. The 2 violations at 1504 N Garden Ave. related to parking lot surfaces and off-street parking space striping. Property photographs on January 19 and 26, 2016 showed off-street parking spaces lacked striping and parking lot surfaces were deteriorated. Property photographs on February 3 and 23, 2016 showed off- street parking spaces with improper striping and deteriorated parking lot surfaces. A permit was Code Enforcement 2016-02-24 1 issued for the work. The property owner, who did not operate the onsite business, said work would be done in 2 weeks. Member Riordon moved to find the Respondent(s) in violation of the City of Clearwater Code as referred to in the affidavit in this case. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Inspector Weaver recommended compliance by March 24, 2016 or a fine of$150 per day per violation be imposed. Assistant City Attorney Matt Smith submitted composite exhibits. Member Riordon moved to enter an order requiring the Respondent to correct the violations on or before March 24, 2016. If the Respondent does not comply within the time specified, the Board may order a fine of$150 per day for each day each violation continues to exist. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. This case came before the City of Clearwater Municipal Code Enforcement Board on February 24, 2016, after due notice to the Respondent(s), and having heard testimony under oath and received evidence, the Board issues the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order: FINDINGS OF FACT Based upon the testimony and evidence received, it is evident that 2 violations exist: parking lot surfaces and off-street parking space striping. The Respondent(s) was/were not present. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The Respondent(s) is/are in violation the City of Clearwater Community Development Code Section(s) 3-1404.113 & 3-1502.K.4, as referred to in the Affidavit in this case. ORDER It is the Order of the Board that the Respondent(s) shall resurface and stripe the parking lot surfaces to comply with said Section(s)of the Code by the deadline, March 24, 2016. The fine is $150.00 per day per violation for each and every day each violation continues past the date set for compliance. Upon complying with said Section(s) of the Code, the Respondent(s) shall notify Inspector Mary Jo Weaver, who shall inspect the property and notify the Board of compliance. If the Respondent(s) fails/fail to comply within the time specified, a certified copy of the Order imposing the fine may be recorded in the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, and once recorded shall constitute a lien against any real property owned by the Respondent(s), pursuant to Chapter 162, Florida Statutes. The Respondent may request a rehearing of the decision of the Board, in writing, and delivered to the City Clerk within 10 days of the postmark of the written order. A request for rehearing shall be based only on the ground that the decision was contrary to the evidence or that the hearing involved an error on a ruling of law which was fundamental to the board's decision. The written request for rehearing shall specify the precise reasons therefor. Upon receipt of a Code Enforcement 2016-02-24 2 request for rehearing, the Board shall determine whether or not to rehear the matter; the Board will not hear oral argument or evidence when making this decision. Any aggrieved party may appeal a final Order of the Municipal Code Enforcement Board by commencing appropriate proceedings in the Circuit Court of Pinellas County within 30 days of the Order. Such an appeal shall not be a hearing de novo, but shall be limited to appellate review of the record created before the Municipal Code Enforcement Board. Florida Statute 286.0105 requires any party appealing a decision of this Board to have a record of the Board's proceedings. DONE AND ORDERED this 24th day of February 2016, at Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida. 4.2 Case 14-16 Timmons, Christine E Living Trust 860 Casler Ave. Exterior Storage/Outdoor Display— Espinosa Attorney Bruce Harlan, representing the Respondent, admitted to the violation in part. Inspector Nilda Espinosa provided a PowerPoint presentation. Notices of violation were issued on January 4, 2016, following the first inspection. The 2 violations at 860 Casler Ave. related to exterior storage and the accumulation and placement of nuisances. The City cleared the property of accumulated junk twice during the past 5 years. Property photographs on January 20, 2016 showed a large accumulation of exterior storage blocking access to the front door, suitcases, clothes, trash, buckets, and junk nearly covering the driveway, and a large accumulation of junk covering the yards including a microwave, clothes, plastic bags, household goods, plastic chairs, boxes, shelves with pottery, indoor light fixtures, etc. Property photographs on February 10, 2016 showed the driveway and yards had exterior storage of containers, tables, chairs, a ladder, suitcases, clothes, buckets, etc. Front door access remained blocked. Property photographs on February 22, 2016 showed a path to the front door was partially cleared, most exterior storage items had been removed from the front yard, an interior door was in the side yard, and in the back yard was exterior storage of suitcases, plastic boxes, glass tables, rugs, wood, etc. Inspector Espinosa said the homeowner had relocated items from the front of the house to the back yard. Attorney Harlan said since the Trust retained him 10 days ago, he instructed the 82 year-old property owner to clean the front of her property, which she did without help of a crew. He said he would represent the Trust until the cleanup was completed. He said the rear of the property would be cleared within 2 weeks. He said the house's interior also needed work. In response to a question, Attorney Harlan agreed the backyard remained in violation. He said financial resources were sufficient to complete the work. Lore Gregory said neighbors had dealt with the consequences of this blighted property for many years, including deflated property values. She said health was her top concern as many children walked to school past the vermin and rodent infested property. She expressed concern the tightly packed house and garage posed a serious fire threat. She said last week, junk had blocked the sidewalk in front of the subject property. She requested the board consider the needs of nearby residents. James Carter said he had pride in his house but the neighborhood had declined since the subject property began to deteriorate. He said the property owner had insulted him and offered Code Enforcement 2016-02-24 3 many excuses re poor conditions. He said it was depressing to drive past the eyesore. He said weeds planted in pots lined the driveway. He reviewed past efforts to clean the property and said permanent actions were needed. Code Compliance Manager Terry Teunis said the City had made every effort to rectify problems at this property but outdoor debris appeared immediately after previous cleanups. He expressed concern re welfare of the resident, her grandson who resided there, and the public. The property owner stored food items outside and was upset when an inspector disposed of a package of green hotdogs; the property's strong foul odor was evident when approaching the house. As he stumbled over items near the front door, a mother rat, protecting her young, attempted to run up his leg. The house caused real problems for the neighborhood. Items in the yard had no purpose and quickly became junk and debris after exposure to the elements. Moving the junk from the front of the property to the rear resolved nothing. He expressed gratitude that an attorney was involved. In response to a question, he said the property had not been before the MCEB (Municipal Code Enforcement Board) previously. Attorney Harlan said he sympathized with neighbors. Member Riordon moved to find the Respondent(s) in violation of the City of Clearwater Code as referred to in the affidavit in this case. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Inspector Espinosa recommended the board issue a Declaration of Violation, declare the property to be a public health, safety, and welfare threat, and pursuant to Community Development Code 7-103.C, order the City and/or representatives to remove any accumulation of weeds, debris, trash, garden trash,junk, untended growth of vegetation, or undergrowth or dead or living vegetation, any property containing or likely to contain rodents, reptiles or other vermin or furnishing a breeding place for flies, mosquitoes, or wood destroying insects, or otherwise threatening the public health, safety or welfare with work being done on behalf of the owner at owner's cost, including administrative cost, and basing completion of the case on the date City staff issues Affidavits of Compliance. Attorney Harlan requested a month to complete the cleanup. He said the Trustee, who did not realize the severity of onsite problems, had a professional staff to meet the Trustee's commitment to maintain the property. He said it was a human issue. Concern was expressed for the health, safety, and welfare of the entire neighborhood. Mr. Teunis requested the board consider the needs of the City and neighbors. The homeowner made previous promises to clean the property. Items in the yard had no value and needed to be thrown away. Staff supported authorizing the City to correct the neighborhood health, safety, and welfare violations and remove the junk and debris as soon as work could be scheduled. Attorney for the Board Andy Salzman said in the future, the Board could fine the property owner up to $500 per day for any repeat violation. Attorney Smith submitted composite exhibits. Member Riordon moved that the property was a serious public health, safety, and welfare threat, and to issue a Declaration of Violation, and pursuant to Community Development Code 7-103.C, to enter an order for the City and/or representatives to remove any accumulation of weeds, debris, trash, garden trash,junk, untended growth of vegetation, or undergrowth or dead Code Enforcement 2016-02-24 4 or living vegetation, any property containing or likely to contain rodents, reptiles or other vermin or furnishing a breeding place for flies, mosquitoes, or wood destroying insects, or otherwise threatening the public health, safety or welfare with work being done on behalf of the owner at owner's cost, including administrative cost, and basing completion of case on date City staff issues Affidavits of Compliance. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. This case came before the City of Clearwater Municipal Code Enforcement Board on February 24, 2016, after due notice to the Respondent(s), and having heard testimony under oath and received evidence, the Board issues the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order as follows: FINDINGS OF FACT Based on the testimony and evidence received, it is evident the condition existed; however, it is further evident the property poses a public health, safety, and welfare threat. A representative of the Respondent(s) was present CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The Respondent(s) was/were in violation of City of Clearwater Community Development Code Section(s) 3-1502.G.2 & 3-913 as referred to in the Affidavit in this case. ORDER It is the Order of this Board that a Declaration of Violation be issued and, pursuant to Community Development Code 7-103.C, the City and/or its representatives shall remove any accumulation of weeds, debris, trash, garden trash,junk, untended growth of vegetation, or undergrowth or dead or living vegetation, any property containing or likely to contain rodents, reptiles or other vermin or furnishing a breeding place for flies, mosquitoes, or wood destroying insects, or otherwise threatening the public health, safety or welfare with work being done on behalf of the owner at the owner's cost, including administrative cost. The Board further orders that If the Respondent(s) repeats/repeat the violation referenced herein within five years of the date City staff issues an Affidavit of Compliance for this case, the Board may order the Respondent(s) to pay a fine of up to $500.00 for each day the repeat violation continues, beginning with the date the notice of violation is issued. The Respondent may request a rehearing of the decision of the Board, in writing, and delivered to the City Clerk within 10 days of the postmark of the written order. A request for rehearing shall be based only on the ground that the decision was contrary to the evidence or that the hearing involved an error on a ruling of law which was fundamental to the Board's decision. The written request for rehearing shall specify the precise reasons therefor. Upon receipt of a request for rehearing, the Board shall determine whether or not to rehear the matter; the Board will not hear oral argument or evidence when making this decision. Any aggrieved party may appeal a final Order of the Municipal Code Enforcement Board to the Circuit Court of Pinellas County within 30 days of the execution of the Order to be appealed or after final disposition of the request for rehearing of the Order to be appealed. Florida Statute 286.0105 requires any party appealing a decision of this Board to have a record of the proceedings. DONE AND ORDERED this 24th day of February 2016, at Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida. Code Enforcement 2016-02-24 5 4.3 Case 15-16 Daniel M. Heller 14 N Mars Ave. RV in ROW/Parking on Unpaved Area Prohibited — Fletcher Property owner Daniel Heller admitted to the violation. Robert Wolfe said he owned the RV and wanted to explain the situation. Inspector Vicki Fletcher provided a PowerPoint presentation. A notice of violation was issued on December 29, 2015, following the first inspection. The violation at 14 N Mars Avenue related to residential parking restrictions. Property photographs on December 29, 2015, January 22, February 4 and 16, 2016 showed a RV parked on an unpaved area in the subject property's front right-of-way. The RV had been removed from the property. Mr. Heller said he did not know previously that parking an RV in front of his house violated Code. He said he had tried to help Mr. Wolfe while he repaired his vehicle. Mr. Wolfe discussed his personal circumstances and said a mechanic had worked on the RV. He said when the notice arrived, he got a tow dolly to move it to the mechanic's shop. He said he never would move the RV back to Mr. Heller's property. Inspector Fletcher said yesterday the RV was parked in the right-of-way down the street from the subject property. Mr. Wolfe said the mechanic needed to make room at his shop for the RV. Attorney Smith submitted composite exhibits. Member Riordon moved to find the Respondent was in violation of the City of Clearwater Code as referred to in the affidavit in this case and to enter an order that no fine be imposed against the Respondent. If the Respondent repeats the violation, the Board may order a fine of up to $500 for each day the violation continues to exist. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. This case came before the City of Clearwater Municipal Code Enforcement Board on February 24, 2016, after due notice to the Respondent(s), and having heard testimony under oath and received evidence, the Board issues the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order as follows: FINDINGS OF FACT Based on the testimony and evidence received, it is evident the condition existed; however, it is further evident this condition was corrected prior to this hearing. The Respondent(s) was/were not present. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The Respondent(s) was/were in violation of City of Clearwater Community Development Code Section(s) 3-1407.A.1.c, 3-1407.A.2.d, 3-1407.A.3.d, & 3-1407.A.7 as referred to in the Affidavit in this case. ORDER Code Enforcement 2016-02-24 6 It is the Order of this Board that no fine will be imposed against the Respondent(s). The Board further orders that If the Respondent(s) repeats/repeat the violation referenced herein within five years, the Board may order the Respondent(s) to pay a fine of up to $500.00 for each day the repeat violation continues, beginning with the date the notice of violation is issued. The Respondent may request a rehearing of the decision of the Board, in writing, and delivered to the City Clerk within 10 days of the postmark of the written order. A request for rehearing shall be based only on the ground that the decision was contrary to the evidence or that the hearing involved an error on a ruling of law which was fundamental to the Board's decision. The written request for rehearing shall specify the precise reasons therefor. Upon receipt of a request for rehearing, the Board shall determine whether or not to rehear the matter; the Board will not hear oral argument or evidence when making this decision. Any aggrieved party may appeal a final Order of the Municipal Code Enforcement Board to the Circuit Court of Pinellas County within 30 days of the execution of the Order to be appealed or after final disposition of the request for rehearing of the Order to be appealed. Florida Statute 286.0105 requires any party appealing a decision of this Board to have a record of the proceedings. DONE AND ORDERED this 24th day of February 2016, at Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida. 4.4 Case 16-16 Remzi Dalip 2135 Burnice Dr. Exterior Storage/Construction Material Storage - Cantrell Property owner Remzi Dalip denied the violation. Inspector Jason Cantrell provided a PowerPoint presentation. Notices of violation were issued on November 24 and December 14, 2015, following the first inspection, in response to an anonymous complaint. The violation at 2135 Burnice Drive related to exterior storage. Property photographs on November 13, 2015 showed the exterior storage of office chairs, construction materials, and stacks of pavers. Property photographs on January 7, 2016 showed the exterior storage of tool boxes, tools, stacked construction debris and items in disarray on the west side of the property, including interior doors, cans of paint, appliances, bi-fold doors, motors, etc. Property photographs on February 23, 2016 showed most exterior storage was removed but construction blocks and piles of items remained. The property was owner occupied. Mr. Dalip said he was 85 years old, had health problems, and planned to sell the house. He said road or sewer construction in front of his house made it difficult for him to move items to the curb. He said he would comply. Member Riordon moved to find the Respondent(s) in violation of the City of Clearwater Code as referred to in the affidavit in this case. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Inspector Cantrell said the property had been cited 11 times since it was annexed 11 years ago. He recommended compliance by March 14, 2016 or a fine of$150 per day be imposed. He said the property owner had access to the curb during the Burnice Street construction project. Attorney Smith submitted composite exhibits. Code Enforcement 2016-02-24 7 Member Strickland moved to enter an order requiring the Respondent to correct the violation on or before March 14, 2016. If the Respondent does not comply within the time specified, the Board may order a fine of$150 per day for each day the violation continues to exist. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. This case came before the City of Clearwater Municipal Code Enforcement Board on February 24, 2016, after due notice to the Respondent(s), and having heard testimony under oath and received evidence, the Board issues the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order: FINDINGS OF FACT Based upon the testimony and evidence received, it is evident that 1 violation exists: exterior storage. The Respondent(s) was/were not present. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The Respondent(s) is/are in violation the City of Clearwater Community Development Code Section(s) 3-1502.G.1, 3-1502.G.2, & 3-1502.G.3, as referred to in the Affidavit in this case. ORDER It is the Order of the Board that the Respondent(s) shall remove all items not intended for outdoor use, remove all trash and debris, and maintain this property in an aesthetically pleasing manner to comply with said Section(s) of the Code by the deadline, March 14, 2016. The fine is $150.00 per day for each and every day the violation continues past the date set for compliance. Upon complying with said Section(s) of the Code, the Respondent(s) shall notify Inspector Jason Cantrell, who shall inspect the property and notify the Board of compliance. If the Respondent(s)fails/fail to comply within the time specified, a certified copy of the Order imposing the fine may be recorded in the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, and once recorded shall constitute a lien against any real property owned by the Respondent(s), pursuant to Chapter 162, Florida Statutes. The Respondent may request a rehearing of the decision of the Board, in writing, and delivered to the City Clerk within 10 days of the postmark of the written order. A request for rehearing shall be based only on the ground that the decision was contrary to the evidence or that the hearing involved an error on a ruling of law which was fundamental to the board's decision. The written request for rehearing shall specify the precise reasons therefor. Upon receipt of a request for rehearing, the Board shall determine whether or not to rehear the matter; the Board will not hear oral argument or evidence when making this decision. Any aggrieved party may appeal a final Order of the Municipal Code Enforcement Board by commencing appropriate proceedings in the Circuit Court of Pinellas County within 30 days of the Order. Such an appeal shall not be a hearing de novo, but shall be limited to appellate review of the record created before the Municipal Code Enforcement Board. Florida Statute 286.0105 requires any party appealing a decision of this Board to have a record of the Board's proceedings. DONE AND ORDERED this 24th day of February 2016, at Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida. Code Enforcement 2016-02-24 8 5. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 5.1 Case 90-15 Affidavit of Non-Compliance Matthew Walker 2010 Rebecca Dr. Roof Maintenance/Exterior Surfaces— Phillips 5.2 Case 107-15 Affidavit of Non-Compliance Christopher& Delores Torunski 1483 Park St. Parking Lot Surfaces — Fletcher 5.3 Case 108-15 Affidavit of Non-Compliance Gary E Rossi 1352 Jeffords St. Exterior Surfaces/Exterior Storage —Alston 5.4 Case 82-15 Affidavit of Compliance David S & Sharlene A Churchill 781 Eldorado Ave. Short Term Rental — Phillips 5.5 Case 87-15 Affidavit of Compliance Faour Muhamed 937 Bruce Ave. Short Term Rental — Phillips 5.6 Case 92-15 Affidavit of Compliance Anahi Mejia La Reina De Mexico Inc. 1400 Gulf to Bay Blvd. Parking Lot Surfaces/Off-Street Parking -Weaver 5.7 Case 111-15 Affidavit of Compliance Janet Bombard & Michael Trapuzzano 964 Mandalay Ave. Short Term Rental — Phillips Member Johnson moved to accept the Affidavit of Compliance for Cases 82-15, 87-15, 92-15, and 111-15 and to accept the Affidavits of Non-Compliance and issue the Orders imposing fines for Cases 90-15, 107-15, and 108-15. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. 5.8 Case 11-16 Clarification of Order of Repeat Violation Vicki A. Hass &William M. Mitchell 3035 Oak Cove Dr. Exterior Storage/Exterior Surfaces - Phillips Attorney Salzman said he was not present at the January 27, 2016 meeting; the board was not authorized to designate a compliance date for a repeat violation. He requested the board clarify its order. Code Enforcement 2016-02-24 9 Member Riordon moved to clarify "Order" paragraph in the Order of Repeat Violation for Case 11-16 dated January 27, 2016, to read "It is the Order of this Board that the Respondent(s) pay a fine of$500.00, payable by April 22, 2016, for the time period December 21, 30, and 31, 2015 and January 4, 6, 7, 8, 15, 19, and 26, 2016, when the repeat violation(s) occurred." The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. This case came before the City of Clearwater Municipal Code Enforcement Board on January 27, 2016, after due notice to the Respondent(s), and having heard testimony under oath and received evidence, the Board issues the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order, which was clarified on February 24, 2016: FINDINGS OF FACT Based upon the testimony and evidence received, it is evident that the subject property has outdoor storage of items strewn across the property including filled and partially filled plastic bags, newspapers, fishing poles, multiple plastic crates, containers, and buckets, plastic drawers, a lawnmower, a gasoline container, a beer container, a walker, a tarp, broken screen, rotten and deteriorated board, a sign, building materials and tools, hose, wheelbarrow, covered objects, a pool ladder, carpets, a barrel, doors and windows, water skies, etc. in violation of the City of Clearwater Community Development Code. The Respondent was present. CONCLUSIONS OF LAIN The Respondent(s) was/were in violation of Code Section(s) 3-1502.G.2 as referred to in the Affidavit in this case and previously was/were found to have violated the same Code Section(s) on March 26, 2014, and therefore, committed a repeat violation. ORDER This case came before the City of Clearwater Municipal Code Enforcement Board again on February 24, 2016 to clarify the Order of the Board to read: It is the Order of this Board that the Respondent(s) pay a fine of$500.00, payable by April 22, 2016, for the time period December 21, 30, and 31, 2015 and January 4, 6, 7, 8, 15, 19, and 26, 2016, when the repeat violation(s) occurred. A certified copy of this Order shall be recorded in the public records of Pinellas County, and once recorded, shall constitute a lien against any real or personal property owned by the violator(s) pursuant to Chapter 162 of the Florida Statutes. The Respondent may request a rehearing of the decision of the Board, in writing, and delivered to the City Clerk within 10 days of the postmark of the written order. A request for rehearing shall be based only on the ground that the decision was contrary to the evidence or that the hearing involved an error on a ruling of law which was fundamental to the board's decision. The written request for rehearing shall specify the precise reasons therefor. Upon receipt of a request for rehearing, the Board shall determine whether or not to rehear the matter; the Board will not hear oral argument or evidence when making this decision. Any aggrieved party may appeal a final Order of the Municipal Code Enforcement Board to the Circuit Court of Pinellas County within 30 days of the execution of the Order to be appealed or Code Enforcement 2016-02-24 10 after final disposition of the request for rehearing of the Order to be appealed. Florida Statute 286.0105 requires any party appealing a decision of this Board to have a record of the proceedings. DONE AND ORDERED this 24th day of February 2016, at Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida. 6. NEW BUSINESS: None. 7. NUISANCE ABATEMENT LIEN FILINGS: SUNTRUST MORTGAGE INC 639 BRYANT ST 21- 29- 15- 00000 -440 - 3000 PNU2015 -01534 $469.21 WALKER, ZELPHIA EST 1305 FAIRMONT ST PNU2015 -01614 10- 29 -15- 71694- 001 -0080 $419.09 PHILLIPS, DEBORAH B EST 1823 BARBARA LN PNU2015 -01737 02- 29 -15- 10926- 000 -0580 $380.08 DONALD S KALEEL SIMON GEORGE 1819 YALE DR PNU2015 -01770 06- 29 -16- 17256- 000 -0150 $480.32 ROTTER, RANDALL D EST 804 FAIRMONT ST PNU2015 -01797 03- 29 -15- 01926- 001 -0190 $480.32 HANAN ATALLA MICHAEL ATALLA 1846 BARBARA LN PNU2015 -01824 02- 29 -15- 10926- 000 -0240 $220.00 Member Riordon moved to accept the Nuisance Abatement Lien filings. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. 8. ADJOURN The meeting adjourned at 2:40 p.m. Attest: Secretary to the B 'ard / v . C7 ■a oflge`, E 0 S Code Enforcement 2016 -02 -24 11 nicipal Code Enforcement Board