Loading...
05/24/1989 MUNICIPAL CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD May 24, 1989 Members present: Robert Aude, Vice-Chairman James Angelis Bruce Cardinal William Murray William Zinzow Absent: Phillip N. Elliott, Chairman (excused) Michael Dallman (excused) Also present: Rob Surette, Assistant City Attorney Mary K. Diana, Secretary for the Board In order to provide continuity for research, the items will be listed in agenda order although not necessarily discussed in that order. The meeting was called to order by the Chairman at 3:00 p.m. in the Commission Meeting Room in City Hall. He outlined the procedures and advised any aggrieved party may appeal a final administrative order of the Municipal Code Enforcement Board to the Circuit Court of Pinellas County. Any such appeal must be filed within thirty (30) days of the execution of the order to be appealed. He noted that Florida Statute 286.0105 requires any party appealing a decision of this Board to have a record of the proceedings to support such an appeal. PUBLIC HEARINGS Public Nuisance/Clearing List 89-5-2 Item #1 Lela Boykin Estate C/O Einstein Boykin Springfield Sub., Blk. 2, Lot 5 aka about 1028 N. Missouri Avenue No one was present to represent the violator. Vernon Packer, Sanitation Inspector, stated the property was posted April 21, 1989 at which time a photograph was taken showing debris, high vegetation and a deteriorated structure. Ownership was verified through the Property Appraiser's Office and notice was sent by certified mail of which the return receipt was received. Mr. Packer stated there was debris in the form of old furniture, concrete blocks, and wood. The Assistant City Attorney requested the Board take judicial notice of Section 95.04. Mr. Packer stated as of this morning, the violation still exists. In response to a question, he stated there are liens currently on the property. Mr. Cardinal moved that concerning Item No. 1, List 89-5-2, regarding violation of Chapter 95 of the Clearwater City Code on property located at about 1028 N. Missouri Ave. aka Springfield Sub., Blk 2, Lot 5, the Municipal Code Enforcement Board has heard testimony at the Municipal Code Enforcement Board hearing held the 24th day of May, 1989, and based on the evidence, the Municipal Code Enforcement Board enters the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order. The Findings of Fact are: after hearing testimony of Vernon Packer, Sanitation Inspector, and viewing the evidence, exhibits submitted: City composite exhibit A, two photographs of the property, it is evident that there exists the excessive growth or accumulation of weeds, undergrowth or other similar plant materials and the accumulation of debris at the above address. The Conclusions of Law are: the Lela Boykin estate C/O Einstein Boykin is in violation of Section 95.04. It is the Order of this Board that Einstein Boykin shall comply with Section 95.04 of the Code of the City of Clearwater within 7 days (5/31/89). Upon failure to comply within the time specified, the City Manager may authorize the entry upon the property and such action as is necessary to remedy the condition, without further notice to Einstein Boykin. The City Commission may then adopt a Resolution assessing against the property on which remedial action was taken by the City the actual cost incurred plus $150.00 administrative cost. Such cost shall constitute a lien against the property until paid. A Notice of Lien, in such form as the City Commission shall determine, may be recorded in the Public Records of Pinellas County as other liens are recorded. If the owner takes remedial action after the time specified, the City Commission may assess the property the $150.00 administrative cost. Such cost shall constitute a lien against the property until paid. Upon complying, Einstein Boykin shall notify Vernon Packer, the City Official who shall inspect the property and notify the Board of compliance. Should a dispute arise concerning compliance, either party may request a further hearing before the Board. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Done and Ordered this 24th day of May, 1989. Case No. 28-89 Dorothy Henriquez 716 Eldorado Avenue (False Alarms) No one was present to represent Ms. Henriquez. Officer Charles Dunn, Clearwater Police Department, stated the first courtesy warnings were sent December 22 and 28, 1988. He stated a false alarm occurred on April 7, 1989 for which there was no evidence of criminal activity. City submitted exhibit A, a copy of the Board's Order of March 22, 1989. Mr. Cardinal moved that concerning Case No. 28-89 regarding violation of Section 94.02 of the Clearwater City Code on property located at 716 Eldorado Avenue, the Municipal Code Enforcement Board has heard testimony at the Municipal Code Enforcement Board hearing held the 24th day of May, 1989, and based on the evidence, the Municipal Code Enforcement Board enters the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order. The Findings of Fact are: after hearing testimony of Officer Charles Dunn, Clearwater Police Department, and taking notice of a prior proceeding at which time the Board issued an order, it is evident that another false alarm occurred after the compliance date set by the Board and within one year of issuance of the first courtesy warning. The Conclusions of Law are: Dorothy Henriquez has not complied with the Order of the Municipal Code Enforcement Board of March 22, 1989. It is the Order of this Board that Dorothy Henriquez shall pay a fine of $50.00 for the false alarm which occurred after the compliance date ordered by the Board March 22, 1989. If Dorothy Henriquez does not pay the fine, a certified copy of this Order shall be recorded in the Public Records of the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court in and for Pinellas County, and once recorded shall constitute a lien against any real or personal property owned by the violator pursuant to Chapter 162, Florida Statutes. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Done and Ordered this 24th day of May, 1989. Case No. 42-89 J.P. Hotels dba Holiday Inn Surfside 400 Mandalay Avenue (False Alarms) The Assistant City Attorney requested the Board take judicial notice of two previous orders of the Board of March 24 and April 27, 1989. Joe Colbert, Life Hazard Safety Inspector, stated another false alarm occurred April 30, 1989 for which there was no evidence of any circumstances that could have caused the alarm. In response to a question, Inspector Colbert stated he is the official record keeper of false alarm reports. Ray Fowler, representing J.P. Hotels, questioned the validity of the false alarm and stated the detector has been reset and there have been no further occurrences. Mr. Fowler stated an outside engineering firm has checked the system and the necessary repairs should be made within 90 days. In response to a question, Mr. Fowler stated the system problems did not cause the false alarm to occur. He stated this alarm has a sensitivity level of 2-3% obscuration and a problem exists in locating a detector compatible with the system. In response to questions, Inspector Colbert stated they are working on correcting the problems with the system. He stated there have been no false alarms since April 29 and believes the use of lower sensitivity detectors would reduce false alarm occurrences. Mr. Angelis moved that concerning Case No. 42-89 regarding violation of Section 94.02 of the Clearwater City Code on property located at 400 Mandalay Ave., the Municipal Code Enforcement Board has heard testimony at the Municipal Code Enforcement Board hearing held the 24th day of May, 1989, and based on the evidence, the Municipal Code Enforcement Board enters the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order. The Findings of Fact are: after hearing testimony of Joseph Colbert, Life Hazard Safety Inspector, and Ray Fowler, representing J.P. Hotels, Inc., and viewing the evidence, exhibits submitted: City exhibits A & B, copies of orders of the Board of prior proceedings, and exhibit C, a copy of the Clearwater Fire Department alarm report of April 30, it is evident that a third false alarm occurred after the compliance date set by the Board and within one year of issuance of the first courtesy warning. The Conclusions of Law are: J.P. Hotels, Inc. dba Holiday Inn Surfside has not complied with the Order of the Municipal Code Enforcement Board of March 22, 1989. It is the Order of this Board that J.P. Hotels, Inc. shall pay a fine of $25.00 for the third false alarm which occurred after the compliance date ordered by the Board March 22, 1989, with the condition that the $50.00 fine currently due the City be paid within five days. If the fine is not paid within five days, the fine issued by this order regarding the third false alarm shall be increased to $250.00. If J.P. Hotels, Inc. dba Holiday Inn Surfside does not pay the fine, a certified copy of this Order shall be recorded in the Public Records of the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court in and for Pinellas County, and once recorded shall constitute a lien against any real or personal property owned by the violator pursuant to Chapter 162, Florida Statutes. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Done and Ordered this 24th day of May, 1989. Case No. 59-89 Chevy's of Clearwater dba Biarritz the Nightclub 1730 U.S. 19 North, #416 (False Alarms) The Assistant City Attorney requested this case be withdrawn due to a problem regarding the courtesy warnings. Mr. Cardinal moved to withdraw Case No. 59-89. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Case No. 62-89 Aetna Life and Casualty 2280 U.S. 19 North, Suite 165 (False Alarms) Officer Charles Dunn, Clearwater Police Department, stated courtesy warnings were sent December 4 and 28, 1988 and a false alarm occurred January 9, 1989. City submitted exhibit A, an Affidavit of No Contest signed by Robert Grathworth, Manager of Aetna Life and Casualty. He stated another alarm occurred January 23rd for which the cause is unknown. Mr. Angelis moved that concerning Case NO. 62-89 regarding violation of Section 94.02 of the Clearwater City Code on property located at 2280 U.S. 19 N., Suite 165, Clearwater, the Municipal Code Enforcement Board has heard testimony at the Municipal Code Enforcement Board hearing held the 24th day of May, 1989, and based on the evidence, the Municipal Code Enforcement Board enters the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order. The Findings of Fact are: after hearing testimony of Officer Charles Dunn, Clearwater Police Department, and viewing the evidence, exhibits submitted: City exhibit A, an Affidavit of No Contest signed by Robert Grathworth as Manager of Aetna Life and Casualty, it is evident the Clearwater Police Department has mailed two courtesy warnings within a one-year period and a false alarm occurred after the date of the second courtesy warning and within one year of the date of the first courtesy warning. The Conclusions of Law are: Aetna Life and Casualty is in violation of Section 94.02. It is the Order of this Board that Aetna Life and Casualty shall take corrective action to ensure that no additional violations of Section 94.02 of the Code of the City of Clearwater occur at 2280 U.S. 19 N., Suite 165 after May 26, 1989. Should the violation reoccur after May 26, 1989, the Board has the authority to impose a fine of up to $250.00 for each additional false alarm occurring within one year from the date the first courtesy warning was mailed. If the Board imposes a fine, a certified copy of the Order imposing the fine may be recorded in the public records of Pinellas County, Florida, and once recorded shall constitute a lien against any real or personal property owned by the violator pursuant to Chapter 162, Florida Statutes. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Done and Ordered this 24th day of May, 1989. Case No. 63-89 Ivey's #162 Clearwater Mall (False Alarms) No one was present to represent Ivey's. Officer Charles Dunn, Clearwater Police Department, stated courtesy warnings were sent December 6, 1988 and January 5, 1989 and a false alarm occurred January 19th. The false alarm report showed the third alarm to have been caused by a mechanical problem. According to security, Ivey's is in the process of changing systems at all locations. Mr. Murray moved that concerning Case No. 63-89 regarding violation of Section 94.02 of the Clearwater City Code on property located at 162 Clearwater Mall, 505 U.S. 19 S., Clearwater, Fla., the Municipal Code Enforcement Board has heard testimony at the Municipal Code Enforcement Board hearing held the 24th day of May, 1989, and based on the evidence, the Municipal Code Enforcement Board enters the following FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDER. The Findings of Fact are: after hearing testimony of Officer Charles Dunn, Clearwater Police Department, and viewing the evidence, it is evident the Clearwater Police Department has mailed two courtesy warnings within a one-year period and a false alarm occurred after the date of the second courtesy warning and within one year of the date of the first courtesy warning. The Conclusions of Law are: Ivey,s is in violation of Section 94.02. It is the Order of this Board that Ivey's shall take corrective action to ensure that no additional violations of Section 94.02 of the Code of the City of Clearwater occur at 162 Clearwater Mall, 505 U.S. 19 S. after May 26, 1989. Should the violation reoccur after May 26, 1989, the Board has the authority to impose a fine of up to $250.00 for each additional false alarm occurring within one year from the date the first courtesy warning was mailed. If the Board imposes a fine, a certified copy of the Order imposing the fine may be recorded in the public records of Pinellas County, Florida, and once recorded shall constitute a lien against any real or personal property owned by the violator pursuant to Chapter 162, Florida Statutes. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Done and Ordered this 24th day of May, 1989. Case No. 64-89 Landmark Towers Condominium Assoc. 1230 Gulf Boulevard (False Alarms) Joseph Colbert, Life Hazard Safety Inspector, stated a courtesy warning sent on March 7, 1989 regarding two false alarm occurrences on March 3 and a third false alarm occurred on April 15, 1989. Doug Baier of PCM Management, representing Landmark Towers Condominium Association, stated rain comes in the air conditioning system louvers and triggers the smoke detector. He stated they have a contract with Simplex to monitor and correct problems with the system. Discussion ensued regarding weather conditions possibly causing the false alarms and the false alarm reports indicated that the weather had been mostly clear during that period. Mr. Murray moved that concerning Case No. 64-89 regarding violation of Section 94.02 of the Clearwater City Code on property located at 1230 Gulf Boulevard, Clearwater, Fla., the Municipal Code Enforcement Board has heard testimony at the Municipal Code Enforcement Board hearing held the 24th day of May, 1989, and based on the evidence, the Municipal Code Enforcement Board enters the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order. The Findings of Fact are: after hearing testimony of Joseph Colbert, Life Hazard Safety Inspector, and Doug Baier, Property Manager for PCM Management, and viewing the evidence, it is evident the Clearwater Police Department has mailed a courtesy warning referencing two false alarms within a one-year period and a false alarm occurred after the date of the second courtesy warning and within one year of the date of the first courtesy warning. The Conclusions of Law are: Landmark Towers Condominium Association is in violation of Section 94.02. It is the Order of this Board that Landmark Towers Condominium Association shall take corrective action to ensure that no additional violations of Section 94.02 of the Code of the City of Clearwater occur at 1230 Gulf Boulevard after June 24, 1989. Should the violation reoccur after June 24, 1989, the Board has the authority to impose a fine of up to $250.00 for each additional false alarm occurring within one year from the date the first courtesy warning was mailed. If the Board imposes a fine, a certified copy of the Order imposing the fine may be recorded in the public records of Pinellas County, Florida, and once recorded shall constitute a lien against any real or personal property owned by the violator pursuant to Chapter 162, Florida Statutes. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Done and Ordered this 24th day of May, 1989. Case No. 65-89 T-Shirt Outlet Plus 432 Poinsettia Ave., #1 (False Alarms) CANCELLED Case No. 66-89 Crossland Savings 1831 North Highland Ave. (False Alarms) There was no one present to represent Crossland Savings. Officer Charles Dunn, Clearwater Police Department, stated courtesy warnings were sent January 27 and February 15, 1989 and a false alarm occurred March 7. The false alarm report states the cause was a mechanical problem. City submitted exhibit A, an Affidavit of No Contest signed by Brenda H. Johnson, Assistant Vice President of Crossland Savings. Mr. Zinzow moved that concerning Case No. 66-89 regarding violation of Section 94.02 of the Clearwater City Code on property located at 1831 N. Highland Ave., Clearwater, Fla., the Municipal Code Enforcement Board has heard testimony at the Municipal Code Enforcement Board hearing held the 24th day of May, 1989, and based on the evidence, the Municipal Code Enforcement Board enters the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order. The Findings of Fact are: after hearing testimony of Officer Charles Dunn, Clearwater Police Department and viewing the evidence, exhibits submitted: City exhibit A, an Affidavit of No Contest signed by Brenda Johnson, Assistant Vice-President of Crossland Savings, it is evident the Clearwater Police Department has mailed two courtesy warnings within a one-year period and a false alarm occurred after the date of the second courtesy warning and within one year of the date of the first courtesy warning. The Conclusions of Law are: Crossland Savings is in violation of Section 94.02. It is the Order of this Board that Crossland Savings shall take corrective action to ensure that no additional violations of Section 94.02 of the Code of the City of Clearwater occur at 1831 N. Highland Avenue after May 26, 1989. Should the violation reoccur after May 26, 1989, the Board has the authority to impose a fine of up to $250.00 for each additional false alarm occurring within one year from the date the first courtesy warning was mailed. If the Board imposes a fine, a certified copy of the Order imposing the fine may be recorded in the public records of Pinellas County, Florida, and once recorded shall constitute a lien against any real or personal property owned by the violator pursuant to Chapter 162, Florida Statutes. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Done and Ordered this 24th day of May, 1989. Case No. 67-89 Michael Angelo Jewelers 1935 U.S. 19 North (False Alarms) Officer Charles Dunn, Clearwater Police Department, stated courtesy warnings were sent regarding false alarms which occurred January 26 and February 22, 1989 and a third alarm occurred March 23rd. The false alarm report showed no evidence of criminal activity and the subscriber did not respond. Angelo Dunlaris, representing Michael Angelo Jewelers, stated the alarm company tried adjusting the system, found it to be defective and replaced it. After a rain storm, the ceiling fell in due to a leaking roof and the dripping rain set off the motion detector. In response to a question, he stated the holdup alarms were replaced about March 1, 1989. The Assistant City Attorney requested this case be withdrawn based on the testimony received. Mr. Murray moved to withdraw Case No. 67-89. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Case No. 68-89 Consolidated Southern Security dba Dictograph Allguard Alarms, Inc. 520 Howard Court (False Alarms) Officer Charles Dunn, Clearwater Police Department, stated courtesy warnings were sent January 26 and February 15, and a false alarm occurred February 25, 1989, which was determined to be caused by human error. Les Wansley, representing Consolidated Southern Security, stated they do not dispute the report that there were false alarm occurrences. Mr. Cardinal moved that concerning Case No. 68-89 regarding violation of Section 94.02 of the Clearwater City Code on property located at 520 Howard Court, Clearwater, Fla., the Municipal Code Enforcement Board has heard testimony at the Municipal Code Enforcement Board hearing held the 24th day of May, 1989, and based on the evidence, the Municipal Code Enforcement Board enters the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order. The Findings of Fact are: after hearing testimony of Officer Charles Dunn, Clearwater Police Department, and Les Wansley, representing Consolidated Southern Security, and viewing the evidence, it is evident the Clearwater Police Department has mailed two courtesy warnings within a one-year period and a false alarm occurred after the date of the second courtesy warning and within one year of the date of the first courtesy warning. The Conclusions of Law are: Consolidated Southern Security dba Dictograph Allguard Alarms, Inc. is in violation of Section 94.02. It is the Order of this Board that Consolidated Southern Security dba Dictograph Inc. shall take corrective action to ensure that no additional violations of Section 94.02 of the Code of the City of Clearwater occur at 520 Howard Court after May 25, 1989. Should the violation reoccur after May 25, 1989, the Board has the authority to impose a fine of up to $250.00 for each additional false alarm occurring within one year from the date the first courtesy warning was mailed. If the Board imposes a fine, a certified copy of the Order imposing the fine may be recorded in the public records of Pinellas County, Florida, and once recorded shall constitute a lien against any real or personal property owned by the violator pursuant to Chapter 162, Florida Statutes. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Done and Ordered this 24th day of May, 1989. Case No. 69-89 Sears Roebuck and Company 2601 U.S. 19 North, #145 (False Alarms) Officer Charles Dunn, Clearwater Police Department, stated courtesy warnings were sent December 30, 1988 and January 19, 1989 and a third alarm occurred March 20, 1989. Two of the alarms were intrusion and one a holdup alarm. There was no evidence of attempted entry, criminal activity or other causes for the alarms. Jim McCurtain, Jr., Manager of Sears, stated they have a sophisticated alarm system which is checked monthly. The alarm is set up each night and the building secured. Every precaution possible is being taken to keep the alarm working properly. In response to a question, Mr. McCurtain stated the roof alarm cannot be set if the door is not closed. Mr. Angelis moved that concerning Case No. 69-89 regarding violation of Section 94.02 of the Clearwater City Code on property located at 2601 U.S. 19 N., #145, Clearwater, Fla., the Municipal Code Enforcement Board has heard testimony at the Municipal Code Enforcement Board hearing held the 24th day of May, 1989, and based on the evidence, the Municipal Code Enforcement Board enters the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order. The Findings of Fact are: after hearing testimony of Officer Charles Dunn, Clearwater Police Department, and Jim McCurtain, Manager for Sears Roebuck and Company, and viewing the evidence, it is evident the Clearwater Police Department has mailed two courtesy warnings within a one-year period and a false alarm occurred after the date of the second courtesy warning and within one year of the date of the first courtesy warning. The Conclusions of Law are: Sears Roebuck and Company is in violation of Section 94.02. It is the Order of this Board that Sears Roebuck and Company shall take corrective action to ensure that no additional violations of Section 94.02 of the Code of the City of Clearwater occur at 2601 U.S. 19 N., #145 after May 26, 1989. Should the violation reoccur after May 26, 1989, the Board has the authority to impose a fine of up to $250.00 for each additional false alarm occurring within one year from the date the first courtesy warning was mailed. If the Board imposes a fine, a certified copy of the Order imposing the fine may be recorded in the public records of Pinellas County, Florida, and once recorded shall constitute a lien against any real or personal property owned by the violator pursuant to Chapter 162, Florida Statutes. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Done and Ordered this 24th day of May, 1989_. Case No. 70-89 Florida National Bank 2140 Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. (False Alarms) Officer Dunn, Clearwater Police Department, stated courtesy warnings were sent January 25 and March 26, and a false alarm occurred March 23, 1989. He stated the cleaning crew set off the third alarm. There were additional alarms for which the cause was unknown. William McCann, representing Florida National Bank, stated a new monitoring system utilizing passwords and time limits was installed March 21st, and the employees are learning the operation of the system. The Assistant City Attorney requested the case be withdrawn as the system was changed prior to the third alarm. Mr. Cardinal moved to withdraw Case No. 70-89. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Case No. 71-89 Paul R. and Wanda J. Nixon 1800 N. Fort Harrison Ave. (Development Code) Geri Doherty, Development Code Inspector, stated she observed the outdoor retail sales display, consisting of a rack of t-shirts and a giant t-shirt on top of the sign, and issued a notice of violation April 21, 1989. City submitted composite exhibit A, two photographs of the property showing the outdoor display. Ms. Doherty stated the property is zoned CR-24, Resort Commercial, and does not allow outdoor retail sales either as a permitted or conditional use. The Assistant City Attorney requested the Board take judicial notice of Section 135.004(b). Ms. Doherty stated a notice was issued with a compliance date of April 27, 1989 and the violation still existed on May 2, 1989. She stated the violation had been corrected as of this morning. The Assistant City Attorney expressed concern that the violators are circumventing the system by correcting the violations just prior to the hearing. He informed the Board that an order can be issued without a fine stating the violation of fact. Wanda Nixon questioned the granting of a license by the City to Mary Hughes, the operator of the t-shirt sales. Ms. Hughes stated she informed the City there would be outside sales. She stated she had been asked by staff if she intended to renew her occupational license. Ms. Doherty stated a merchant license was issued for 1806 N. Ft. Harrison Ave. and there was no note of outdoor sales. In response to a question, she stated indoor retail sales would be a permitted use. Ms. Hughes and Mrs. Nixon emphasized they are not purposely evading the City Code. Mr. Zinzow moved that concerning Case No. 71-89 regarding violation of Section 135.004(b) of the Clearwater City Code on property located at 1800 Fort Harrison Ave. N., Clearwater, Fla., the Municipal Code Enforcement Board has heard testimony at the Municipal Code Enforcement Board hearing held the 24th day of May, 1989, and based on the evidence, the Municipal Code Enforcement Board enters the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order. The Findings of Fact are: after hearing testimony of Geri Doherty, Development Code Inspector, Wanda Nixon and Mary Hughes, and viewing the evidence, exhibits submitted: City composite exhibit A, it is evident that there did exist an outdoor retail display inconsistent with the City Code land use for this Resort Commercial zoning district. The Conclusions of Law are: Paul R. and Wanda Nixon were in violation of Section 135.004(b). It is the Order of this Board that should the above mentioned violation reoccur, Paul and Wanda Nixon will be subject to a $25.00 fine for each day the violation exists without a further hearing before the Municipal Code Enforcement Board. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. If the Board imposes a fine, a certified copy of the Order imposing the fine may be recorded in the public records of Pinellas County, Florida, and once recorded shall constitute a lien against any real or personal property owned by the violator pursuant to Chapter 162, Florida Statutes. Done and Ordered this 24th day of May, 1989. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Case No. 48-89 Michael R. and John G. O'Connell 110 Brightwater Drive (Occupational License) Affidavit of Compliance Mr. Cardinal moved to accept the Affidavit of Compliance. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. OTHER BOARD ACTION - None. NEW BUSINESS - None. MINUTES - Meetings of April 26 and May 10, 1989. Mr. Angelis moved to approve the minutes of the meetings of April 26 and May 10, 1989 as submitted. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 5:25 p.m.