Loading...
DRC - DRAFT ACTION AGENDA - 01/07/2016 CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT re �w� POS`1`OFFICE Box 4748,CLEARWAT'ER,FLORIDA 3375$-4748 n¢�'��J MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYR`T`LE AVENUE, CLEARWA'T`ER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE(727)562-4567 FAX(727)562-4576 DRAFT ACTION AGENDA DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE Thursday, January 07, 2016 8:30 - Staff Review 9:00 AM Case number: FLD2015-12049--317 CORONADO DR Owner(s): P K Developments Inc 1406 Drew St Clearwater, FL 33755-5207 PHONE: (727) 514-0605, Fax: No fax, Email: No email Applicant: PHONE: No phone, Fax: No fax, Email: No email Representative: Housh Northside Engineering 300 S Belcher Road Clearwater, FL 33765 PHONE: (727) 709-0943, Fax: (727) 446-8036, Email: Housh@northsideengineering.Net; Sandy @northsideengineering.Net Location: The 0.15 acre property is located on the east side of Coronado Drive approximately 242 feet north of the Brightwater Drive and Coronado Drive intersection. Atlas Page: 276A Zoning District: Tourist Request: The Community Development Board (CDB) is reviewing a proposed restaruant in the Tourist (T) District for the property located at 317 Coronado Avenue. The project is 8.5 feet in height (from Base Flood Elevation), includes zero parking spaces, and requests flexibility from setback and landscape requirements (Sections 2-803.D and 3-1202.E.2). Proposed Use: Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhood Coalition Association(s): Clearwater Beach Association Presenter: Kevin Nurnberger, Senior Planner 1/7/2016 1 DRC ActionAgenda °EQ?UAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMA`T'IVE ACTION EMPLOYER° Workflow: Review Name Task Status Status Date Last Name Determination of Complete 12/10/2015 Nurnberger Completeness Solid Waste Review Comments 12/14/2015 Pryor Where would this Dumpster be stored? Inside or outside? There will be requirements from Fire Department if Dumpster is housed to close to building or is in a covered area. Parks and Rec Review No Comments 12/15/2015 Reid Fire Review Comments 12/17/2015 Schultz Environmental Review Comments 12/17/2015 Kessler Engineering Review Comments 12/18/2015 Simpson Traffic Eng Review Comments 12/21/2015 Elbo Stormwater Review Comments 12/30/2015 Bawany Land Resource Review Comments 12/30/2015 Anderson 1/7/2016 2 DRC ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMXHVF AcnON EMPLOYER" The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: Engineering Review Prior to Community Development Board Please provide a site plan that demonstrates drop curb adjacent to the western property boundary restored with standard curb. **SEE PAGE 36 ON DOCUMENT. Engineering Review Prior to Community Development Board There is a sabal palm tree in the Coronado Drive right of way near the Southwest corner of the property. This palm tree is not included on the landscape, or site plan. Please revise the Site Plan and Landscape Plan to include this tree. **SEE PAGE 36 ON DOCUMENT. Engineering Review Prior to Community Development Board: Any right-of-way landscape plantings, irrigation, lighting or hardscape components on Coronado Drive will be protected or replaced to the City's Beach Walk specifications and design details. Please acknowledge. **SEE PAGE 36 ON DOCUMENT. Environmental Review General Notes: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Additional permits from State agencies, such as the Southwest Florida Water Management District or Florida Department of Environmental Protection, may be required. Approval does not relieve the applicant from the requirements to obtain all other required permits and authorizations. **SEE PAGE 0 ON DOCUMENT. Environmental Review Priorto issuance of Building Permit: Provide erosion control measures on plan sheet, and provide notes detailing erosion control methods. **SEE PAGE 35 ON DOCUMENT. Environmental Review Priorto issuance of Building Permit: An Asbestos Survey is usually required prior to conducting any demolition or renovations. Contact Pinellas County Air Quality (727/464-4422) for more information. **SEE PAGE 35 ON DOCUMENT. Fire Review Sheet A2 shows the width of aisle at counter to be less than 44 inches. Shall meet the requirement of NFPA 1 2012 edition section 12.2.5.8 Aisles Serving Seating at Tables. Please provide details and show on plans. **SEE PAGE 39 ON DOCUMENT. Fire Review Sheet A2 shows rollout dumpster located adjacent to building. Must meet the requirement of NFPA 1 2009 edition chapter 19.2.1.4. Please provide details. **SEE PAGE 39 ON DOCUMENT. 1/7/2016 3 DRC ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMXHVF AcnON EMPLOYER" Land Resource Review Priorto Building Permit: There are trees located along the south property line that need to be removed or preserved. There is not any clarification on what your planning to do with them. If they are to be preserved please show tree preservation methods you plan to implement to preserve them. **SEE PAGE 35 ON DOCUMENT. Land Resource Review Prior to Building Permit: A tree removal Permit will be required for the tree labeled as note 7. **SEE PAGE 35 ON DOCUMENT. Land Resource Review General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, prior to issuance of a building permit any and all performance based erosion and sedimentation control measures must be approved by Environmental and or Stormwater Engineering, be installed properly, and inspected. **SEE PAGE 35 ON DOCUMENT. Land Resource Review Prior to CDB: There does not appear to be a landscape plan in this set of plans. The closest thing to a landscape plan I can find is this page. Please clarify. **SEE PAGE 39 ON DOCUMENT. Solid Waste Review Where would this Dumpster be stored? Inside or outside? There will be requirements from Fire Department if Dumpster is housed to close to building or is in a covered area. Stormwater Review Prior to Building Permit As per the introduction of the City of Clearwater Drainage Design Criteria, redevelopment of property where no stormwater facilities exist requires the addition of stormwater facilities. Please specify how stormwater facilities are proposed to be provided. **SEE PAGE 36 ON DOCUMENT. Traffic Engineering Prior to CDB: Review In the parking study for Table 1, change the function from nightclub/bar customers to restaurant customers. Traffic Engineering Prior to CDB: Review On Table 4 in the parking study, remove the accessible parking spaces from the 1064 spaces, if they were counted in the "TOTAL". Traffic Engineering Prior to CDB: Review Applicant shall acknowledge that the City of Clearwater's Parking Division shall not be responsible for providing and/or reserving City public parking spaces for the employees of the new restaurant. **SEE PAGE 16 ON DOCUMENT. 1/7/2016 4 DRC ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMHIVE AcnON EMPLOYER" Traffic Engineering General Note(s): Review Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule which shall be paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). The TIF amount for the new restaurant with credit is $7,819.78 DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. **SEE PAGE 34 ON DOCUMENT. 1/7/2016 5 DRC ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMXHVF AcnON EMPLOYER" 9:30 AM Case number: FLS2015-11035-- 1359 S FT HARRISON AVE Owner(s): Prometheus Management Iv Llc 520 D Street Ste D Clearwater, FL 33756 336 PHONE: No phone, Fax: No fax, Email: No email Applicant: Nick Peters 1340 Hamlet Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 PHONE: (407) 401-1140, Fax: No fax, Email: Nick_Peters @earthlink.Net Representative: Craig Cornelison Cornelison Engineering & Design, Inc. 38039 Old 5th Avenue Zephyrhills, FL 33542 PHONE: No phone, Fax: (813) 788-7802, Email: Craig @cornelison-eng.Com Location: The subject property is located on the east side of South Fort Harrison Avenue on the northeast corner of South Fort Harrison Avenue and D Street intersection. Atlas Page: 305B Zoning District: Industrial Research and Technology Request: The Development Review Committee (DRC) is reviewing a proposed Wholesale/Distribution/Warehouse Facility in the Industrial Research and Technology(IRT) District for the property located at 1359 South Fort Harrison Avenue. The project is 18.8 feet in height (from grade to roof), and requests allowable flexibility from lot area and lot width requirements (Section 2-1303.W.) Proposed Use: Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhood Coalition Association(s): Presenter: Kevin Nurnberger, Senior Planner 1/7/2016 6 DRC ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMXI'IVE AcnON EMPLOYER" Workflow: Review Name Task Status Status Date Last Name Determination of Complete 12/08/2015 Nurnberger Completeness Parks and Rec Review No Comments 12/11/2015 Reid Solid Waste Review Comments 12/11/2015 Pryor The size of enclosure and location will limit this enclosure to a maximum of a 4 yard dumpster on wheels. It is too small and steering radius off of alley way will not allow a stationary dumpster. Environmental Review Comments 12/14/2015 Kessler Engineering Review Comments 12/16/2015 Simpson Traffic Eng Review Comments 12/17/2015 Elbo Planning Review Comments 12/17/2015 Nurnberger Fire Review Comments 12/30/2015 Schultz Land Resource Review Comments 12/30/2015 Anderson 1/7/2016 7 DRC ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMXHVF AcnON EMPLOYER" The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: Engineering Review Prior to Development Order: The 15 foot Alley"to the east of the property is actually an 18 foot right-of- way. Please correct. **SEE PAGE 14 ON DOCUMENT. Engineering Review General Comments: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site- specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. Only Sheets C04 and C05 were reviewed for General Engineering criteria. The additional details provided in the plan set may have been necessary for other departmental reviews to provide flexible development approval. Construction plans shall be reviewed in more detail prior to receipt of the building permit. Any work in city right of way will require a city right of way use permit which is permitted through the Engineering Department. Right of way permits can be found online at http://myclearwater.com/gov/depts/pwa/engin/FormsApplications.asp DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review. Additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. **SEE PAGE 14 ON DOCUMENT. Environmental Review General Notes: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Offsite discharge of produced groundwater from dewatering shall comply with dewatering guidelines from Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), F.A.C. 62-621.300(2). Additional permits from State agencies, such as the Southwest Florida Water Management District or Florida Department of Environmental Protection, may be required. Approval does not relieve the applicant from the requirements to obtain all other required permits and authorizations. Environmental Review Priorto issuance of Building Permit: Provide erosion control measures on plan sheet, and provide notes detailing erosion control methods. 1/7/2016 8 DRC ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMHIVE AcnON EMPLOYER" Fire Review Shall meet the requirements of NFPA 1 2012 edition chapter 16 Safeguarding Construction, Alteration, and Demolition Operations to include but not be limited to complying with NFPA 241, establishing a fire protection plan, providing and maintaining adequate escape facilities, providing and maintaining fire department access roads throughout the entire project, providing stairs and standpipe as the building progresses. A pre-construction meeting shall be set up to discuss these and other issues resulting in this construction project. This shall be coordinated through the construction site project manager. Please acknowledge and describe on plans. **SEE PAGE 15 ON DOCUMENT. Fire Review FDC shall be located no closer than 25 feet and no further than 50 feet from the supporting fire hydrant. Please acknowledge and show on plan. **SEE PAGE 15 ON DOCUMENT. Land Resource Review Prior to Building Permit: A tree removal permit is required for the removal of these trees. **SEE PAGE 2 ON DOCUMENT. Land Resource Review General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, prior to issuance of a building permit any and all performance based erosion and sedimentation control measures must be approved by Environmental and or Stormwater Engineering, be installed properly, and inspected. **SEE PAGE 11 ON DOCUMENT. Land Resource Review Prior to Building Permit: Lets schedule a meeting to look at root prune limits. Tree preservation plan will not need any revisions just simply implemented. **SEE PAGE 11 ON DOCUMENT. Planning Review In regards to the existing pole sign, CDC Section 6-104.A states in the event a building permit is required for the redevelopment of a principal use/structure signs on the parcel proposed for development shall be brought into compliance by obtaining a level one approval in accordance with the provisions of Article 4, Division. Provide the dimensions and details of existing pole sign to determine if it meets Code. If the existing sign does not meet Code, then any future signage shall meet the requirements of Code and be architecturally integrated with the design of the building with regard to proportion, color, material and finish as part of a final sign package submitted to and approved by Staff. Be aware that signage is handled through separate permits and are not included with building permits for site or shell work. **SEE PAGE 14 ON DOCUMENT. 1/7/2016 9 DRC ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMXHVF AcnON EMPLOYER" Planning Review On site plan, need to provide a curb along the north permitter of the parking lot. Section 3-1204 requires All landscaping required by this division must be protected from vehicular and pedestrian traffic by the installation of curbing and wheel stops, or other protective devices along the perimeter of any landscaping which adjoins vehicular use areas or sidewalks. These protective devices shall have a minimum height of six inches above grade **SEE PAGE 14 ON DOCUMENT. Planning Review On site plan -sidewalk along east side of building needs to be reduced in width to 42 inches. Only 42 inch wide sidewalks that lead to a door are permitted in a required setback or else it is a structure in the setback and needs to meet the 15 foot side setback. **SEE PAGE 14 ON DOCUMENT. Planning Review The solid waste enclosure shall be be made of similar material, color, and finish of the primary building. **SEE PAGE 17 ON DOCUMENT. Planning Review That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy all of the proposed landscaping shall be installed **SEE PAGE 19 ON DOCUMENT. Planning Review That an automatic permanent irrigation system shall be provided for complete water coverage for all required and other landscaping materials and maintained as a fully functioning system in order to preserve the landscaping in a healthy growing condition; **SEE PAGE 19 ON DOCUMENT. Planning Review That prior to the issuance of any building permits the location and visibility of electric equipment (electric panels, boxes and meters) be reviewed and, if located exterior to the building where visible from any street frontage, be shown to be painted the same color as the portion of the building to which such features are attached; **SEE PAGE 19 ON DOCUMENT. Planning Review That all nonconforming signage be removed or otherwise be brought into conformance with the CDC within one year of approval of this application request; **SEE PAGE 19 ON DOCUMENT. Planning Review That the final design of the building be generally consistent with the elevations approved by the DRC; That the final design of the site be generally consistent with the drawings approved by the DRC; That prior to the issuance of any building permit, the solid waste enclosure shall be consistent with those used in the construction of and the architectural style of the principal building shall be utilized and that evidence of same be submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits; That prior to the issuance of any building permits, the mechanical equipment on the roof shall be shown to be located and screened from view from the public right-of-way level from adjoining properties; That any future signage shall meet the requirements of Code and be architecturally integrated with the design of the building with regard to proportion, color, material and finish as part of a final sign package submitted to and approved by Staff; **SEE PAGE 19 ON DOCUMENT. Planning Review Revise sight visibility triangle on alley driveway so the triangle lines up wit with the property line not in alley. **SEE PAGE 3 ON DOCUMENT. Planning Review Revise sight visibility triangle at driveway entrance to alley. The triangle is taken from the property line not within the alley. **SEE PAGE 14 ON DOCUMENT. 1/7/2016 10 DRC ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMXI'IVE AcnON EMPLOYER" Solid Waste Review The size of enclosure and location will limit this enclosure to a maximum of a 4 yard dumpster on wheels. It is too small and steering radius off of alley way will not allow a stationary dumpster. Stormwater Review General Comments DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review. Additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. **SEE PAGE 15 ON DOCUMENT. Stormwater Review Prior to Building Permit Please denote Seasonal High Water Table on cross section of pond. **SEE PAGE 15 ON DOCUMENT. Stormwater Review Prior to Building Permit Rough inspection shall be called in for work performed on D Street. **SEE PAGE 15 ON DOCUMENT. Stormwater Review Prior to Building Permit MOT shall be coordinated with the City of Clearwater traffic department prior to open cut of D Street for storm pipe. **SEE PAGE 15 ON DOCUMENT. Traffic Eng Review Prior to a Development Order: Show 20'x 20' sight visibility triangles at the east leg of the South Fort Harrison Av and D Street intersection. There shall be no objects in the sight triangle which do not meet the City's acceptable vertical height criteria at a level between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade. (City's Community Development Code, Section 3-904). Traffic Eng Review General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. 1/7/2016 11 DRC ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMHIVE AcnON EMPLOYER" 9:45 AM Case number: FLS2015-11037-- 932 BRUCE AVE Owner(s): Jennifer A Massini 949 Bruce Ave Clearwater, FL 33767 101 PHONE: No phone, Fax: No fax, Email: No email Applicant: Bill Donovan P.O. Box 1762 Dunedin, FL 34697 PHONE: (727) 638-5725, Fax: No fax, Email: Bali-design @hotmail.Com Representative: Bill Donovan Bali Design Inc P.O. Box 1762 Dunedin, FL 34697 PHONE: (727) 638-5725, Fax: No fax, Email: Bali-design @hotmail.Com Location: The property is located on the west side of Bruce Avenue approximately 79 feet south of the Laurel Street and Bruce Avenue intersection. Atlas Page: 238A Zoning District: Low Medium Density Residential Request: The Development Review Committee (DRC) is reviewing a proposed garage addition, bedroom addition, and pool/pool deck in the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District for the property located at 932 Bruce Avenue. The project is 11.37 feet in height (from grade to mid-point of pitched roof), and requests allowable flexibility from setback requirements (Section 2-203.B.) Proposed Use: Neighborhood Clearwater Beach Association Association(s): Clearwater Neighborhood Coalition Presenter: Kevin Nurnberger, Senior Planner 1/7/2016 12 DRC ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMXI'IVE AcnON EMPLOYER" Workflow: Review Name Task Status Status Date Last Name Determination of Complete 12/02/2015 Nurnberger Completeness Traffic Eng Review Comments 12/10/2015 Elbo Parks and Rec Review No Comments 12/11/2015 Reid Solid Waste Review No Comments 12/11/2015 Pryor Engineering Review Comments 12/15/2015 Gluski Environmental Review Comments 12/17/2015 Kessler Planning Review Comments 12/21/2015 Nurnberger Art Review No Review Required 12/21/2015 Nurnberger Harbor Master Review No Review Required 12/21/2015 Nurnberger Fire Review No Review Required 12/29/2015 Schultz Land Resource Review Comments 12/29/2015 Anderson Stormwater Review Comments 12/30/2015 Bawany 1/7/2016 13 DRC ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMXI'IVE AcnON EMPLOYER" The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: Engineering Review General Note: Per the plat, a 5 ft. utility easement is located along the rear of the property line. Under no circumstances shall any structure(s) be constructed within the 5 ft. utility easement. The City of Clearwater has no utilities located within this area. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. **SEE PAGE 0 ON DOCUMENT. Environmental Review General Notes: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Additional permits from State agencies, such as the Southwest Florida Water Management District or Florida Department of Environmental Protection, may be required. Approval does not relieve the applicant from the requirements to obtain all other required permits and authorizations. **SEE PAGE 0 ON DOCUMENT. Land Resource Review Priorto Building Permit: There are two Queen Palms located in the front yard of the residence that are not shown on the plans. Please show them on the plans and explain if they will be removed or retained. Queen Palms are are on the FLEPC list as a category II noxious exotic and removal is encouraged. **SEE PAGE 3 ON DOCUMENT. Land Resource Review Prior to Certificate of Occupancy: Two Native shade trees are required for a lot this size please show any existing and any proposed shade trees on the plans. The trees will be installed and inspected prior to CO. **SEEPAGE 3 ON DOCUMENT. Land Resource Review General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, prior to issuance of a building permit any and all performance based erosion and sedimentation control measures must be approved by Environmental and or Stormwater Engineering, be installed properly, and inspected. **SEE PAGE 3 ON DOCUMENT. Planning Review Staff can support the rear set back of five feet to pool if pool is built at grade and not elevated. **SEE PAGE 3 ON DOCUMENT. 1/7/2016 14 DRC ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMXI'IVE AcnON EMPLOYER" Planning Review Staff has been able to establish through review of approved site plans and surveys on file the most consistent front setback is 20 feet which is typical of character of adjacent properties and properties that front on Bruce Ave in the immediate vicinity of the subject property. **SEE PAGE 3 ON DOCUMENT. Planning Review Revise plan so garage additions and bedroom addition have a front setback dimension of 20 feet from front property line to structure. **SEE PAGE 3 ON DOCUMENT. Planning Review You will need to provide competent substantial evidence that adjacent and properties and those along the same stretch of Bruce Ave have existing or approved front setbacks consistent with requested setback reductions. **SEE PAGE 3 ON DOCUMENT. Planning Review Submit survey that shows existing conditions only. Do not show proposed additions. **SEE PAGE 5 ON DOCUMENT. Planning Review Site plan shows a dimension of 18 feet from proposed garage to sidewalk. Not sure what it indicates but no automobiles may be partially parked within the public right-of-way. Standard parking space length dimension is 18 feet so automobiles will need to be parked in garage since the dimension is only 15 feet from garage to front property line. **SEE PAGE 3 ON DOCUMENT. Planning Review Planning Review The site plan shows the rear setback of 10 feet can be met if the pool was reorientated to be parallel with the rear property line. Provide a response on how the pool location is necessary due to any conflicting structures or trees on the property. **SEE PAGE 3 ON DOCUMENT. Stormwater Review Prior to Building Permit Previously permitted lot grading is to be maintained. **SEE PAGE 5 ON DOCUMENT. Stormwater Review Prior to Building Permit Any roof drains shall be directed toward the street. **SEE PAGE 5 ON DOCUMENT. Stormwater Review Prior to Building Permit Please show sediment and erosion control plan. **SEE PAGE 5 ON DOCUMENT. Stormwater Review General Comments DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review. Additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. **SEE PAGE 5 ON DOCUMENT. Traffic Engineering General Note: Review DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. **SEE PAGE 3 ON DOCUMENT. 1/7/2016 15 DRC ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMXI'IVE AcnON EMPLOYER" 10:05 AM Case number: FLS2015-11036-- 1111 CARDOVA LN Owner(s): Clearwater Housing Auth 908 Cleveland St Clearwater, FL 33755 451 PHONE: No phone, Fax: No fax, Email: No email Applicant: Charessa Doty 908 Cleveland Street Clearwater, FL 337554511 PHONE: (727) 461-5777, Fax: No fax, Email: Kthibault @clearwaterhousingauth.Org Representative: Charessa Doty Clearwater Housing Authority 908 Cleveland Street Clearwater, FL 337554511 PHONE: (727) 461-5777, Fax: No fax, Email: Kthibault @clearwaterhousingauth.Org Location: 1111 Cardova Lane consists of 0.380 acres and is located at the southeastern corner of Cardova Lane and Stevenson Avenue. Atlas Page: 260A Zoning District: Medium Density Residential Request: The Development Review Committee (DRC) is reviewing a proposed six foot high perimeter fence at the existing attached residential complex located at 1111 Cardova Lane within the Medium Density Residential (MDR) District pursuant the allowable flexibility of the fence height requirements. (Section 3-804). Proposed Use: Attached Dwellings Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhood Coalition Association(s): Presenter: Melissa Hauck-Baker, Senior Planner 1/7/2016 16 DRC ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMXI'IVE AcnON EMPLOYER" Workflow: Review Name Task Status Status Date Last Name Determination of Complete 12/04/2015 Hauck-Baker Completeness Parks and Rec Review No Comments 12/11/2015 Reid Solid Waste Review No Comments 12/11/2015 Pryor Environmental Review Comments 12/14/2015 Kessler Engineering Review Comments 12/16/2015 Simpson Traffic Eng Review Comments 12/17/2015 Elbo Land Resource Review Comments 12/22/2015 Crandall Stormwater Review Comments 12/30/2015 Simpson Fire Review Comments 12/31/2015 Schultz Planning Review Comments 01/07/2016 Hauck-Baker 1/7/2016 17 DRC ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMXI'IVE AcnON EMPLOYER" The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: Engineering Review General Comments: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review. Additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. **SEE PAGE 0 ON DOCUMENT. Engineering Review Prior to Development Order: Please provide 20'x 20'sight visibility triangles at each driveway. There shall be no objects in the sight triangle over the City's acceptable vertical height criteria at a level between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade (Community Development Code, Section 3-904). Environmental Review General Notes: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Additional permits from State agencies, such as the Southwest Florida Water Management District or Florida Department of Environmental Protection, may be required. Approval does not relieve the applicant from the requirements to obtain all other required permits and authorizations. **SEE PAGE 0 ON DOCUMENT. Fire Review Fire department access not shown on plans. Shall meet the requirements of NFPA 1 2012 edition section 18.2.2 Access to Structures or Areas. Please provide details and show on plans. **SEE PAGE 9 ON DOCUMENT. Land Resource Review Show the proposed fence and the existing trees on the same plans so any impacts can be determined. Further, clarify if there will be any columns or pillars for the fence. **SEE PAGE 8 ON DOCUMENT. 1/7/2016 18 DRC ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMXHVF AcnON EMPLOYER" Planning Review Planning Review General Site Plan and Application Comments 1. The proposed 6 foot high, black aluminum 3 rail standard echelon fence is appropriate for the portions located forward of the structure along the three public rights of way. 2. Section 3-804.A.1, permits in the MDR zoning district, brick of other masonry walls or walls with masonry columns linked by substantial grill work shall be permitted to a maximum height of 6 feet and shall be architecturally compatible with the principal structure on the property and compatible with the surrounding properties. 3. While the echelon fence will meet the requirement of the substantial grill work, the standard two inch square posts of the fence will not meet the requirement of the masonry columns. 4. The proposed fence design will need to include columns at every corner point and at every fourth fence panel. Information regarding the design and building materials of the columns will need to be submitted. 5. The fence may only be placed on the subject property and may not extend into any public right of way. 6. The portion of proposed fence along Stevenson Avenue may in fact extend into the public right of way. 7. Stevenson Avenue is a 40 foot right of way and does not end at the edge of street pavement. 8. The private property line along Stevenson Avenue is approximately 15 feet east of the eastern edge of the street paving. 9. The fence also appears to be located within the sight visibility triangles which need to be delineated on the plan and the fence may not extend into the required 20 foot distance. 10. Please amend proposed fence layout and provide a scaled drawing of the proposed fence location with the required tree location information. General Applicability Criteria 11. Applicant has satisfactorily addressed the required criteria. Flexibility Criteria 12. Applicant has satisfactorily addressed the required criteria. Stormwater Review General Comments DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review. Additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. **SEE PAGE 6 ON DOCUMENT. Stormwater Review Prior to Building Permit Please acknowledge new fence shall not cause drainage issues for adjacent property. **SEE PAGE 6 ON DOCUMENT. Traffic Eng Review General Comments DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review. Additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. 1/7/2016 19 DRC ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMXHVF AcnON EMPLOYER" 1/7/2016 20 DRC ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMI'LOYMFN`I'AND AFFIRMXHVF AcnON EMPLOYER" 10:35 AM Case number: FLD2015-11048-- 18573 US HIGHWAY 19 N Owner(s): Clearwater Cay Holdings Llc 5020 W. Linebaugh Ave. Suite 250 Tampa, FL 33624 507 PHONE: No phone, Fax: No fax, Email: No email Applicant: Joel Mies 900 Brookstone Centre Parkway Columbus, GA 31904 PHONE: (813) 716-6390, Fax: (706) 324-4150, Email: Joel.Mies @flournoydev.Com Representative: Joel Mies Flournoy Development Company 900 Brookstone Centre Parkway Columbus, GA 31904 PHONE: (813) 716-6390, Fax: (706) 324-4150, Email: Joel.Mies @flournoydev.Com Location: 15.85 acres generally at the southeast corner of US Highway 19 North and Belleair Road. Atlas Page: 318A Zoning District: Commercial Request: The Community Development Board (CDB) is reviewing a proposed 323-unit multi- family development in the Commercial (C) District for the property located at 18573 US Highway 19 North. The project will consist of six primary buildings up to 45 feet in height, includes a minimum of 583 parking spaces and requests allowable flexibility with regard to the use (Community Development Code Section 2-7041). Proposed Use: Attached Dwellings Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhood Coalition Association(s): Presenter: Mark Parry, Senior Planner 1/7/2016 21 DRC ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMXI'IVE AcnON EMPLOYER" Workflow: Review Name Task Status Status Date Last Name Determination of Complete 12/09/2015 Parry Completeness Planning Review Comments 12/09/2015 Parry Harbor Master Review No Review Required 12/09/2015 Parry Art Review No Reveiw Required 12/09/2015 Parry Environmental Review Comments 12/17/2015 Kessler Parks and Rec Review Comments 12/17/2015 Reid Land Resource Review Comments 12/22/2015 Crandall Engineering Review Comments 12/23/2015 Simpson Traffic Eng Review Comments 12/28/2015 Elbo Fire Review Comments 12/30/2015 Schultz Stormwater Review Comments 12/30/2015 Bawany 1/7/2016 22 DRC ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMXI'IVE AcnON EMPLOYER" The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: Engineering Review General Comments: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site- specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. Additionally, the lift station may need to be upgraded to handle the load from the additional sanitary load. Only Sheets C-2.0 and C-5.0 were reviewed for General Engineering criteria. The additional details provided in the plan set may have been necessary for other departmental reviews to provide flexible development approval. Construction plans shall be reviewed in more detail prior to receipt of the building permit. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review. Additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. **SEE PAGE 17 ON DOCUMENT. Engineering Review Prior to Community Development Board Please provide a site plan that shows all proposed easements, existing easements and easements to be vacated. The existing easements will need to be changed when you change the location of the water and sewer lines. **SEE PAGE 22 ON DOCUMENT. Engineering Review Prior to Community Development Board: There is a 40 ft. DOT right-of-way easement (OR 4055-394) running parallel to the US 19 corridor and located in the northwest corner of this property. Only surplus parking can be located within said easement. **SEE PAGE 19 ON DOCUMENT. Engineering Review Prior to Community Development Board: The proposed Car wash area can't drain into the public sanitary sewer system. Please acknowledge. **SEE PAGE 22 ON DOCUMENT. Engineering Review Priorto Building Permit: The City has an existing 8" reclaimed water main located in the northwest corner of the property. As per City of Clearwater Reclaimed Water System Ordinances, 32.351, and 32.376, use of potable water for irrigation is prohibited; the irrigation system shall be hooked up to the reclaimed water system that is available to this site. **SEE PAGE 22 ON DOCUMENT. Engineering Review Prior to Community Development Board: Please clarify if the trash area will be dumpsters or a trash compactor. If the "Trash" area located in the southeast corner of the property (shown on Sheet C-5.0) is proposed to be a "Trash Compactor", then the existing north/south 8" water main will need to relocated at the developer/owner's expense, and the 8" private sanitary sewer main serving 18167 US 19 North will need to be relocated. **SEE PAGE 22 ON DOCUMENT. 1/7/2016 23 DRC ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMHIVE AcnON EMPLOYER" Engineering Review Prior to Community Development Board: Please relocate the old "Sam Seltzer's" fire and domestic service out from under the "Proposed 7-Bay Garage"structure as shown on Sheet C-5.0. **SEE PAGE 22 ON DOCUMENT. Engineering Review Priorto issuance of Building Permit: All fire hydrant assemblies installed 10 ft or greater from a water main shall be constructed with ductile iron pipe and shall have a gate valve at the tee on the branch line, and at the fire hydrant assembly (F.H.A.). **SEE PAGE 22 ON DOCUMENT. Engineering Review Priorto issuance of Building Permit: Please show all fire protection lines entering each building. A back-flow device will be required for each fire line. The developer/owner will be responsible for all associated cost. **SEE PAGE 22 ON DOCUMENT. Engineering Review Priorto issuance of Building Permit: Please address the vehicular conflict point where the "private gate" as shown on Sheet C-05 for the "Tenant Boat/RV Storage" area and the ingress/egress drive aisle connection to the "Belleair Road" extension meet (vehicles existing will end up in the ingress side of this drive aisle connection and the gate can be damaged during a turning movement). **SEE PAGE 22 ON DOCUMENT. Engineering Review Priorto issuance of Building Permit: Sanitary sewer clean-out installation will be required at each service "wye" connection for each building. **SEE PAGE 22 ON DOCUMENT. Engineering Review Priorto issuance of Building Permit: Sanitary sewer manhole spacing shall me a maximum of 350 ft and a manhole shall be installed at all termination ends for maintenance of this system. **SEE PAGE 22 ON DOCUMENT. Engineering Review Priorto issuance of Building Permit: All gate valves shall be accessible and not within any parking spaces. **SEE PAGE 22 ON DOCUMENT. Engineering Review Priorto issuance of Building Permit: Please show the location of the FDC connection for each building. Location of these devices may require additional FHA's to be installed to meet Fire Department's requirement. **SEE PAGE 22 ON DOCUMENT. Engineering Review Priorto issuance of Building Permit: Please change the gate swing for the ingress/egress access point into the apartment complex off of the Belleair Road extension (a vehicle may end up hitting the gate exiting if the gate swing opens as shown on Sheet C-5.0). **SEE PAGE 22 ON DOCUMENT. Engineering Review Priorto issuance of Building Permit: Applicant shall provide a copy of an approved permit from the City of St. Petersburg for work in the 50-foot water main transmission easement. Contact Tom Shemancik at (727) 892-5384 for permit information. **SEE PAGE 22 ON DOCUMENT. Engineering Review Priorto issuance of Building Permit: Note: All planting within any easement will be installed at the property owner's risk. The City will not be responsible for any/all uprooted or damaged plants within easement(s) if the City needs to maintain/replace existing utility mains. **SEE PAGE 22 ON DOCUMENT. 1/7/2016 24 DRC ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMXHVF AcnON EMPLOYER" Engineering Review Prior to Certificate of Occupancy: Please provide a copy of the private sanitary sewer easement for the existing 8" private north/south sanitary sewer main located along the east property and serving 18167 US 19 North. **SEE PAGE 22 ON DOCUMENT. Engineering Review Prior to Certificate of Occupancy: Any/all easement(s) shall be obtained (recorded) prior to a C.O. being issued for the building(s). Please contact Real Estate Services Manager with the Engineering Department for information needed to obtain such easement(s). Easements required: blanket water main easement for the fire hydrant line (not the water service lines), sanitary sewer easements (both private and public) and an access easement for Lift Station 5, ingress/egress/parking/... etc. **SEE PAGE 22 ON DOCUMENT. Engineering Review Prior to application for Building Permit: The current site address 18573 US HWY 19 North will need to be changed. Please contact Don Melone (727-562-4798) to get an appropriate address assigned. **SEE PAGE 22 ON DOCUMENT. Engineering Review Please relocate, at the developer's expense, the existing 8"water main that is approximately 4'from the proposed garage structure (adjacent to the lift station). **SEE PAGE 22 ON DOCUMENT. Environmental Review Priorto issuance of Building Permit: Provide erosion control measures on plan sheet, and provide notes detailing erosion control methods. **SEE PAGE 18 ON DOCUMENT. Environmental Review General Notes: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Additional permits from State agencies, such as the Southwest Florida Water Management District or Florida Department of Environmental Protection, may be required. Approval does not relieve the applicant from the requirements to obtain all other required permits and authorizations. Fire Review Sheet C-5.0 shows gated entry on plan. Shall meet the requirements of NFPA 1 2012 edition chapter 18 section 18.2 Fire Department Access. Shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 20 ft. The AHJ shall have the authority to require fire department access be provided to gated subdivisions or developments through the use of an approved device or system. Provide Knox Electric Key Switch with battery backup. Please Acknowledge and show on plans. **SEE PAGE 22 ON DOCUMENT. Fire Review Provide and show on the plan minimum 30 foot turning radius for emergency vehicle ingress and egress at all entrance and exits. Please acknowledge and show on plans. **SEE PAGE 22 ON DOCUMENT. Fire Review Separate plans and permits required for Fire Alarm, Fire Sprinkler, Fire Line Underground. Please acknowledge and describe on plans. **SEE PAGE 22 ON DOCUMENT. 1/7/2016 25 DRC ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMXI'IVE AcnON EMPLOYER" Fire Review Shall meet the requirements of NFPA 1 2012 edition chapter 16 Safeguarding Construction, Alteration, and Demolition Operations to include but not be limited to complying with NFPA 241, establishing a fire protection plan, providing and maintaining adequate escape facilities, providing and maintaining fire department access roads throughout the entire project, providing stairs and standpipe as the building progresses. A pre-construction meeting shall be set up to discuss these and other issues resulting in this construction project. This shall be coordinated through the construction site project manager. Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, they shall be installed, completed and in service prior to construction as per NFPA-241. All underground fire lines must be installed by a contractor with a class I, II or V license with separate plans and permit. Please acknowledge and describe on plans. **SEE PAGE 22 ON DOCUMENT. Fire Review Where Valet Trash Service is to be utilized, requirements for Capacity of Means of Egress and Hazardous Area Protection shall be met. Please acknowledge and describe on plans. **SEE PAGE 22 ON DOCUMENT. Fire Review No FDC shown on plans. This fire department connection shall be located within 25-50 feet, as measured along a normal access route, of the fire hydrant. FDC shall be a minimum of 15'from building. Fire Department Connection shall be a 2 1/2 inch Siamese connection listed for such use. Please provide details. Please provide details and show on plans. **SEE PAGE 22 ON DOCUMENT. Land Resource Review All noxious invasive species and prohibited trees must be removed. **SEE PAGE 18 ON DOCUMENT. Land Resource Review Elms are a shade tree and must be planted a minimum of 5 feet away from impervious surface (in a landscape island a minimum of 10 feet from back of curb to back of curb). Revise landscape island to be wider or revise to an accent tree. **SEE PAGE 25 ON DOCUMENT. Land Resource Review At time of building permit a separate tree preservation plan will be required. (Do not double it on to the landscape plan. It may be doubled onto the tree removal, demo, or erosion control plan). **SEE PAGE 25 ON DOCUMENT. Land Resource Review On the landscape plan do NOT show existing trees to be removed. This will be confusing at time of permitting and landscape inspection. This does not need to be changed to move forward, but revise for building permit submittal. **SEE PAGE 25 ON DOCUMENT. Land Resource Review Planting a large, wide-spreading tree like a live oak on a property line is strongly not recommended. Also shade trees must be a minimum of 5 feet away from impervious. Revise to a more columnar species of tree. **SEE PAGE 25 ON DOCUMENT. Land Resource Review From previous discussion it was decided that the trees do not need to be tagged on site, however there needs to be at least one site plan that has the tree ID numbers on it so that the rating can be matched up. Preferably this would be the same sheet that shows tree removal. (C-1.0). retained. **SEE PAGE 26 ON DOCUMENT. 1/7/2016 26 DRC ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMHIVE AcnON EMPLOYER" Parks and Recreation Open space/recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building Review permits or final plat (if applicable)whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Debbie Reid at 727-562- 4818 to calculate the assessment. **SEE PAGE 0 ON DOCUMENT. Planning Review Gen. App. Criterion 1: No comments. **SEE PAGE 1 ON DOCUMENT. Planning Review Gen. App. Criterion 2: Typo-"there"should be "their highest and best use". Actually, I would argue that few if any of the surrounding parcels are developed to their respective highest and best use especially when the new Corridor Plan comes on line. I suggest approaching this criteria from the standpoint that the proposed use is compatible with existing surrounding uses and that the proposed residential use will support the surrounding retail and restaurant uses and that the proposed use will present an overall mixed use development when taken into account with the adjacent non-residential uses. **SEE PAGE 1 ON DOCUMENT. Planning Review Gen. App. Criterion 3: Clarify what enhanced security and pedestrian improvements entail. **SEE PAGE 1 ON DOCUMENT. Planning Review Gen. App. Criterion 4: The second sentence is good but I think you may want to discuss the number of access points which will serve the site as well as staking distance at gates. The fact of the matter is that 323 dwelling units will certainly impact traffic. The main thing is to talk about how this impact will be mitigated. **SEE PAGE 1 ON DOCUMENT. Planning Review Gen. App. Criteria 5: You will want to borrow some of the language you use to address criterion 1. You may want to mention the heights of surrounding development as they relate to your proposal. **SEE PAGE 1 ON DOCUMENT. Planning Review Gen. App. Criterion 6: You may want to note how solid waste will be addressed as well and any outdoor amenities and their buffering. You should also mention the general level and type of perimeter buffering. **SEE PAGE 1 ON DOCUMENT. Planning Review CIRP Criteria: No comments. "SEEPAGE 10 ON DOCUMENT. Planning Review Cover Sheet: It appears that PIN 20/29/16/00000/330/0600 is included in the project location vicinity map although it is listed as not included on the site survey and, it should be noted, not included anywhere else. I would like to see the project line adjusted for accuracy. **SEE PAGE 17 ON DOCUMENT. Planning Review Sheet C-2.0: Clarify what sorts of amenities will be provided outside of the swimming pool. Clarify how much interior amenity space will be provided in terms of floor area. Such amenities could include meeting space, exercise room, business center, etc. In addition, I assume this is the case but please confirm that all amenity space is for the sole use of residents and their guests. **SEE PAGE 19 ON DOCUMENT. Planning Review Sheet C-2.0: Clarify that all above ground utilities adjacent to the site will be placed underground with the proposal unless such undergrounding is not practicable. **SEE PAGE 19 ON DOCUMENT. Planning Review Sheet C-2.0: Clarify how mechanical equipment will be located and screened from view. **SEE PAGE 19 ON DOCUMENT. 1/7/2016 27 DRC ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMXHVF AcnON EMPLOYER" Planning Review Sheet C-2.0: Please show all sight visibility triangles. **SEE PAGE 19 ON DOCUMENT. Planning Review Sheet C-2.0: Clarify how many linear feet of buffer is less than the otherwise required width. Then compare that figure to how much linear footage meets or exceeds the required buffer width. "SEEPAGE 190N DOCUMENT. Planning Review Sheet C-2.0: Clarify if, and if so, how, the site will be gated with regard to vehicular and pedestrian traffic. A gated system is not required but I see that vehicular and pedestrian gates are labeled in the area of the leasing and clubhouse building, along Belleair Road and at the large vehicle storage area. I do not see any controlled entries at the north US 19 entrance or from the two retail parcels along US 19 N. and was wondering how those points would work. **SEE PAGE 19 ON DOCUMENT. Planning Review Sheet C-2.0: Please label the buildings Type I through VI. **SEE PAGE 19 ON DOCUMENT. Planning Review Sheet C-2.0: Please provide some details with what sort of fencing will be provided with regard to materials, colors, height, etc. **SEE PAGE 19 ON DOCUMENT. Planning Review Sheet C-2.0: Please provide dimensions from property lines to parking and buildings. Minimum setbacks are dimensioned occasionally but not for every property line. **SEE PAGE 19 ON DOCUMENT. Planning Review Sheet C-2.0: It appears that a setback less than 10 feet is provided at several points along the south, east and south property lines which will require the submittal of a Comprehensive Landscape Program as a 10 foot landscape buffer is required between attached dwelling uses and other uses. It also looks like some of the interior landscape islands do not meet the requirements of the CDC with regard to island width which also be part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program. On this note, providing a note and dimension showing a 10 foot minimum is somewhat misleading as what you are really showing is a 10 foot maximum. The fact is that setbacks to parking go down to near zero in places. Please revise. Please note that this will render the development inconsistent with the proposed 19 Plan which requires parking to meet the same setbacks as buildings. **SEE PAGE 19 ON DOCUMENT. Planning Review Sheet C-2.0: Please double check the parking count. The site data table provides that there will be 583 spaces but I count 595 spaces including a group of 10 spaces on the south side of the northeast building which did not have a space count number. Please double check the parking count and make sure that all spaces shown are accounted for. **SEE PAGE 19 ON DOCUMENT. Planning Review Sheet C-2.0: Clarify what sort of sidewalk will be provided along the west side of the site along the US Hwy 19 N. frontage road. **SEE PAGE 19 ON DOCUMENT. Planning Review Sheet C-2.0: Please show a difference in paving material and/or texture where sidewalks cross driveways. **SEE PAGE 19 ON DOCUMENT. Planning Review Sheet C-2.0: Clarify how solid waste will be handled. I see one trash area. Clarify if this is the only one. In addition, please provide some details on the surrounding trash compactor wall. It will need to complement the buildings on the site with regard to materials, fit and finish. **SEE PAGE 19 ON DOCUMENT. 1/7/2016 28 DRC ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMXI'IVE AcnON EMPLOYER" Planning Review Sheet C-2.0: There is a typo in the site data table- it should be Vehicular Use "Area" rather than "Are". **SEE PAGE 19 ON DOCUMENT. Planning Review Sheet C-2.0: Please provide the amount of interior landscaped area in the site data table. In addition, please provide a separate sheet which shows this area graphically. **SEE PAGE 19 ON DOCUMENT. Planning Review Sheet C-2.0: There are several points where sidewalks cross drive aisles where crosswalk markings are not shown where they probably should be. Please update the site plan to better delineate crosswalks. **SEE PAGE 19 ON DOCUMENT. Planning Review Sheet C-2.0: Please provide some dimensions on the parking in front of the clubhouse building and the parallel spaces at the northwest corner of the site. **SEE PAGE 19 ON DOCUMENT. Planning Review Sheet L-1: We are trying to encourage plant diversity throughout the City. With that in mind, please revise to swap out crepe myrtles with another type of appropriate accent tree. **SEE PAGE 23 ON DOCUMENT. Planning Review Sheet L-3: There are four live oaks just north of the car wash area which are right on top of some underground utilities which need to be moved -either the trees or the utilities-your choice. **SEE PAGE 25 ON DOCUMENT. Planning Review Sheet L-3: The far southeast corner of the site where the dumpster is proposed appears to be missing. Please revise to include this area. **SEE PAGE 25 ON DOCUMENT. Planning Review Sheet L-4: Please provide the number of trees provided. The required number of trees have been listed for the north, east, west and south but I need the provided number of tree provided as you did for the Belleair Road and US Hwy. 19 N. calcs just above. "SEEPAGE 26 ON DOCUMENT. Planning Review Sheets A5.et.al: Clarify which buildings these floor plans are for. **SEE PAGE 28 ON DOCUMENT. Planning Review Sheet A6.31: Clarify of which building type this is a typical elevation. Please provide elevations of the other types of buildings proposed. **SEE PAGE 34 ON DOCUMENT. Planning Review Sheet A6.31: Please provide a rendered version of the building elevations. **SEE PAGE 34 ON DOCUMENT. Planning Review Sheet A6.31: Clarify the what style of architecture is used. You can probably work that into one of your responses to the Comp. Infill criteria. **SEE PAGE 34 ON DOCUMENT. Planning Review Sheet A6.31: You can adjust your height down a bit, I think. Height is measured to the midpoint of the main roof structure for peaked roofs. If there is a BFE out there then you can start zero feet from that point rather than grade. **SEE PAGE 34 ON DOCUMENT. Planning Review Please note that additional comments may be generated at or subsequent to the DRC meeting based on responses to DRC comments. Please carefully review the listed request. It is ultimately the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the request reflects what is wanted. In order to be reviewed by the CDB on February 16, 2016 10 sets (revised as needed) and one electronic version (uploaded via the City's website) must be submitted no later than noon January 15, 2016 **SEE PAGE 94 ON DOCUMENT. 1/7/2016 29 DRC ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMHIVE AcnON EMPLOYER" Planning Review General: There is, according to City records, an ingress/egress and parking easement between 18401 US Hwy. 19 N., the existing office building along Belleair Road, and surrounding parcels. No mention of this is made with the submittal. Clarify how the proposal will maintain the required number of parking spaces for the office use (33 spaces) as well as providing adequate parking for the proposed residential use. **SEE PAGE 0 ON DOCUMENT. Planning Review Sheet C-2.0: The boat and RN storage area is considered an accessory use and must be located behind the leading edge of a principal structure. This area must be relocated elsewhere on site. **SEE PAGE 19 ON DOCUMENT. Planning Review Sheet C-2.0: It appears that the trash compactor area will displace required parking for the adjacent office. Clarify how this parking will be replaced for the office use. **SEE PAGE 19 ON DOCUMENT. Planning Review Sheet C-2.0: Overhead doors facing a street right-of-way are not permitted under the proposed US 19 Plan where overhead doors are proposed facing US 19 on the west side of the far northwest building. Please revise to eliminate these types of doors. **SEE PAGE 19 ON DOCUMENT. Planning Review Sheet C-2.0: Roof-top mounted signs are prohibited pursuant to CDC Section 3-18043-1804.1. Please revise to remove this note and please take notice that there is no opportunity to request flexibility with regard to this provision outside of a Code amendment. In addition, please be aware that without a full sign packet submittal any approvals granted will not include signage in any way- location, number, size, type, etc. **SEE PAGE 19 ON DOCUMENT. Planning Review Sheet C-2.0: Clarify if the proposal will meet the proposed 18 inch minimum ground floor elevation of the proposed US 19 Plan. **SEE PAGE 19 ON DOCUMENT. Planning Review Sheet C-2.0: Clarify what sorts of site changes, if any, will be required of adjacent properties. If there are needed changes then those properties may need to new site plans. I am specifically speaking to the two parcels on either side of the main driveway off of US 19. The property on the north side is subject to a site plan approved as part of FLS2004-06041 and the property on the south to a site plan approved as part of FLS2006-08050. **SEE PAGE 19 ON DOCUMENT. Planning Review Sheet C-2.0: Clarify what the feature is to the west of the clubhouse. **SEE PAGE 19 ON DOCUMENT. Planning Review Sheet C-2.0: Please show all parking spaces which are proposed to be located within any right-of-way easement or within a drainage and/or utility easement abutting any public right-of-way. Please be aware that pursuant to CDC Section 3-1402.E required off-street parking spaces shall not be located within any right-of-way easement or within a drainage and/or utility easement abutting any public right-of-way. If any proposed spaces are located in such an easement they cannot count towards the parking totals. **SEE PAGE 19 ON DOCUMENT. Stormwater Review Prior to CDB Unlike SWFWMD regulations, all wet stormwater management systems shall incorporate a vegetated littoral shelf over 35% of the areal cover of the pond under normal conditions. (stormwater manual pg 10) **SEE PAGE 20 ON DOCUMENT. 1/7/2016 30 DRC ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMXI'IVE AcnON EMPLOYER" Stormwater Review Prior to CDB Areas directly outfalling into tidal saltwater basins will be reviewed for water quality impacts only. Water quality treatment shall be available in an above ground treatment process . (Stormwater manual Pg 10) **SEE PAGE 20 ON DOCUMENT. Stormwater Review Prior to CDB Was saltwater intrusion considered in the wet pond design calculations? **SEE PAGE 20 ON DOCUMENT. Stormwater Review Prior to CDB Basin 300 must be routed to stormwater ponds for water quality treatment. **SEE PAGE 20 ON DOCUMENT. Traffic Engineering Prior to a Building Permit: Review Provide pedestrian curb ramps compliant with ADA standards at all sidewalk connections. **SEE PAGE 19 ON DOCUMENT. Traffic Engineering Prior to CDB: Review Provide 20'x 20' sight visibility triangles at the driveway(s). There shall be no objects in the sight triangle over the City's acceptable vertical height criteria at a level between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade (City's Community Development Code, Section 3-904). **SEE PAGE 19 ON DOCUMENT. Traffic Engineering Prior to a Building Permit: Review Provide wheel stops where parking spaces abut the sidewalks to prevent parked vehicles from overhanging and blocking the pedestrian pathway. **SEE PAGE 19 ON DOCUMENT. Traffic Engineering Prior to CDB: Review Provide provisions for school bus pickup and drop off area, separated from through traffic. **SEE PAGE 19 ON DOCUMENT. Traffic Engineering Prior to CDB: Review Provide 40 feet of clear stacking in advance of all guardhouses or security gates along Belleair Road (Community Development Code, Section 3-1406). **SEE PAGE 19 ON DOCUMENT. Traffic Engineering Prior to a Building Permit: Review Provide appropriate pavement marking arrows and signs for the roadabout per current M.U.T.C.D standards. **SEE PAGE 19 ON DOCUMENT. Traffic Engineering Prior to a Building Permit: Review The typical dimensions for parallel parking spaces shall be to current City standards (Community Development Code, Section 3-1402). **SEE PAGE 19 ON DOCUMENT. 1/7/2016 31 DRC ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMXHVF AcnON EMPLOYER" Traffic Engineering Prior to CDB: Review On page 2 of the traffic impact study, provide a sentence or two describing how the traffic signal cycle lengths were attained for the various signalized intersections. **SEE PAGE 37 ON DOCUMENT. Traffic Engineering Prior to CDB: Review On page 3 of the traffic impact study, change the PM LOS from "C "to "B" for "NB Frontage Rd/Drive A (RT)". **SEE PAGE 40 ON DOCUMENT. Traffic Engineering Prior to CDB: Review On figure 3 of the traffic impact study, relocate the "13 trips"from "NB US HWY 19"to "SB FRONTAGE RD". **SEE PAGE 41 ON DOCUMENT. 1/7/2016 32 DRC ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMXI'IVE AcnON EMPLOYER" 11:35 AM Case number: FLS2015-12078-- 949 Bay Esplanade Owner(s): PHONE: No phone, Fax: No fax, Email: No email Applicant: Stephen Fowler 1421 Court St. Suite D Clearwater, FL 33756 PHONE: (727) 449-2021, Fax: (727) 447-5339, Email: Fowlerarch @aol.Com Representative: Stephen Fowler Fowler Associates Architects, Inc. 1421 Court St. Suite D Clearwater, FL 33756 PHONE: (727) 449-2021, Fax: (727) 447-5339, Email: Fowlerarch @aol.Com Location: 0.252 acres located approximately 175 feet north of Laurel Street Atlas Page: Zoning District: Request: The Development Review Committee (DRC) is reviewing a proposed patio for the property located at 949 Bay Esplanade. The project requests allowable flexibility from side and rear setback requirements (Section 2-203.C). Proposed Use: Detached Dwelling Neighborhood Clearwater Beach Association Association(s): Clearwater Neighborhood Coalition Presenter: Mark Parry, Senior Planner 1/7/2016 33 DRC ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMXI'IVE AcnON EMPLOYER" Workflow: Review Name Task Status Status Date Last Name Determination of Complete 12/09/2015 Parry Completeness Planning Review Comments 12/09/2015 Parry Harbor Master Review No Review Required 12/09/2015 Parry Art Review No Review Required 12/09/2015 Parry Solid Waste Review No Comments 12/11/2015 Pryor Engineering Review Comments 12/15/2015 Gluski Parks and Rec Review No Comments 12/15/2015 Reid Environmental Review Comments 12/17/2015 Kessler Traffic Eng Review Comments 12/17/2015 Elbo Land Resource Review Comments 12/22/2015 Crandall Fire Review No Review Required 12/29/2015 Schultz Stormwater Review Comments 12/30/2015 Simpson 1/7/2016 34 DRC ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMXI'IVE AcnON EMPLOYER" The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: Engineering Review General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. **SEE PAGE 0 ON DOCUMENT. Environmental Review General Notes: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Additional permits from State agencies, such as the Southwest Florida Water Management District or Florida Department of Environmental Protection, may be required. Approval does not relieve the applicant from the requirements to obtain all other required permits and authorizations. **SEE PAGE 0 ON DOCUMENT. Land Resource Review It appears that a 28 inch live is proposed to be removed as part of the development. At time of building permit a tree removal permit will be required and a payment to the Tree Fund at a rate of$48 per inch removed will be required. ($48 x 18 inches equals $864). Acknowledge. You will receive credit for any trees planted. **SEE PAGE 3 ON DOCUMENT. Land Resource Review It appears that five live oaks with a caliper of 3 inches are proposed to be planted. This will replace 15 of the inches removed. At time of building permit there will be a CO condition requiring a landscape final for the replacement inches. Acknowledge. **SEE PAGE 7 ON DOCUMENT. Planning Review General: Based on the provided figures it appears that the proposed ISR will 0.66 where 0.65 is the maximum. Please revise to meet the ISR limitations. **SEE PAGE 0 ON DOCUMENT. Planning Review Specific Use Criteria 1 through 8- No comments. **SEE PAGE 1 ON DOCUMENT. Planning Review Gen. App. Criteria 1 through 6- No comments. **SEE PAGE 2 ON DOCUMENT. Planning Review Sheet SD-1.1: Show and clarify what sorts of buffering along the north and south sides of the site existing or will be provided. **SEE PAGE 3 ON DOCUMENT. Planning Review Sheets SD-1.1 and 1.2: Please provide the grade of the proposed patio. I want to know how much above grade the patio will be. **SEE PAGE 3 ON DOCUMENT. Planning Review Sheets SD-1.1 and 1.2: Please revise to show proposed side and rear setbacks dimensioned. **SEE PAGE 3 ON DOCUMENT. 1/7/2016 35 DRC ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMXHVF AcnON EMPLOYER" Planning Review Sheet SD-1.2: The sheet is cut off and does not show the south property line. **SEE PAGE 5 ON DOCUMENT. Planning Review Please note that additional comments may be generated at or subsequent to the DRC meeting based on responses to DRC comments. **SEE PAGE 8 ON DOCUMENT. Stormwater Review Prior to Building Permit Please acknowledge that retaining wall is to remain. **SEE PAGE 4 ON DOCUMENT. Stormwater Review Prior to Building Permit Please show sediment and erosion control plan. **SEE PAGE 4 ON DOCUMENT. Stormwater Review General Comments DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review. Additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. **SEE PAGE 4 ON DOCUMENT. Traffic Engineering General Note: Review DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. **SEE PAGE 0 ON DOCUMENT. 1/7/2016 36 DRC ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMXI'IVE AcnON EMPLOYER" 4:00 PM Case number: ANX2015-10030 -- 3128 Johns PKWY Owner(s): Saxony Company, Inc. 800 Moss Avenue Clearwater, FL 33759 PHONE: (727) 515-8855, Fax: No fax, Email: No email Applicant: PHONE: No phone, Fax: No fax, Email: No email Location: 0.261 acres located on the north side of Johns Parkway, approximately 310 feet east of North McMullen Booth Road. Atlas Page: 292A Zoning District: Low Medium Density Residential Request: The City Council is considering a request for a voluntary annexation into the City of Clearwater. It is proposed that the property be assigned an initial Future Land Use Map designation of Residential Urban (RU) and an initial zoning category of Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR). Proposed Use: Detached Dwelling Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhood Coalition Association(s): Presenter: Katie See, Senior Planner Workflow: Review Name Task Status Status Date Last Name Determination of Complete 12/14/2015 See Completeness Harbor Master Review No Review Required 12/14/2015 See Traffic Eng Review No Comments 12/17/2015 Elbo Planning Review No Comments 12/21/2015 See Fire Review No Comments 12/29/2015 Schultz Land Resource Review No Comments 12/30/2015 Anderson 1/7/2016 37 DRC ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMXI'IVE AcnON EMPLOYER" 4:00 PM Case number: FLD2015-11046--405 ISLAND WAY Owner(s): Lincolnshire 405 Island Way Apts Llc 555 Skokie Blvd Ste 555 Northbrook, IL 60062 285 PHONE: No phone, Fax: No fax, Email: No email Applicant: 555 Skokie Boulevard, Suite 555 Northbrook, IL 60062 PHONE: (847) 313-6492, Fax: (847) 498-7893, Email: Drotenberg @ebixby.Com Representative: Terri Skapik Woods Consulting Inc 1714 Country Road 1 Suite 22 Dunedin, FL 34698 PHONE: (727) 919-0848, Fax: (727) 786-7479, Email: Terriskapik @woodsconsulting.Org Location: 405-415 Island Way consists of 1.35 acres and is located on the eastern side of Island Way approximately 100 feet south of the intersection of Skiff Point. Atlas Page: 267B Zoning District: Island Estates Neighborhood Overlay District Request: The Community Development Board (CDB) is reviewing a proposed multi-family dock in the Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District of the Island Estates Neighborhood Conservation Overlay(IENCOD) District for the property located at 405-415 Island Way. The dock will exceed 500 square feet and is being reviewed consistent with the dock requirements (Section 3-601.C.2-3). Proposed Use: Attached Dwellings Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhood Coalition Association(s): Island Estates Civic Assocaition Presenter: Melissa Hauck-Baker, Senior Planner 1/7/2016 38 DRC ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMXI'IVE AcnON EMPLOYER" Workflow: Review Name Task Status Status Date Last Name Determination of Complete 12/04/2015 Hauck-Baker Completeness Solid Waste Review No Comments 12/11/2015 Pryor Parks and Rec Review No Comments 12/15/2015 Reid Engineering Review Comments 12/16/2015 Simpson Environmental Review Comments 12/17/2015 Kessler Traffic Eng Review No Comments 12/17/2015 Elbo Land Resource Review No Comments 12/29/2015 Anderson Planning Review Comments 12/29/2015 Hauck-Baker Fire Review Comments 12/30/2015 Schultz Stormwater Review Comments 12/30/2015 Bawany 1/7/2016 39 DRC ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMXI'IVE AcnON EMPLOYER" The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: Engineering Review DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review. Additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. **SEE PAGE 14 ON DOCUMENT. Environmental Review General Notes: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Additional permits from State agencies, such as the Southwest Florida Water Management District or Florida Department of Environmental Protection, may be required. Approval does not relieve the applicant from the requirements to obtain all other required permits and authorizations. **SEE PAGE 0 ON DOCUMENT. Environmental Review Priorto issuance of Building Permit: A dock/dredge and fill permit may be required prior to conducting any additions. Contact Pinellas County Water and Navigation Authority at (727) 453-3385 for more information. **SEE PAGE 1 ON DOCUMENT. Fire Review Shall meet the requirements of NFPA 303 2011 edition chapter 6 Fire Protection. Please provide details and describe on plans. **SEE PAGE 12 ON DOCUMENT. Planning Review Planning Review General Site Plan and Application Comments 1. The proposed project includes the construction of a multi-use dock exceeding 500 square feet which is reviewed as a commercial dock subject to Section 3-601.C.3 and triggers the Level Two, Flexible Development review process. 2. The 2,729 square foot dock will feature a main fixed dock of six feet by 225 feet, five fixed piers of four feet by 40 feet, one fixed pier five feet by 60 feet, one floating pier five feet by 36 feet and a total of 16 wet slips. 3. The proposed dock meets all of the dimensional requirements for a multi- use dock given the property and waterway dimensional allowances. 4. The reference to 15 wet slips was found within the written portion of the application, as the plans reflect the 16 wet slips please correct the error. 5. The written portion of the application also made reference to Beach by Design, the subject property is not applicable to these requirements. General Applicability Criteria 6. Applicant has satisfactorily addressed the required criteria. Flexibility Criteria 7. Applicant has satisfactorily addressed the required criteria. 1/7/2016 40 DRC ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMXI'IVE AcnON EMPLOYER" Planning Review General Site Plan and Application Comments 1. The proposed project includes the construction of a multi-use dock exceeding 500 square feet which is reviewed as a commercial dock subject to Section 3-601.C.3 and triggers the Level Two, Flexible Development review process. 2. The 2,729 square foot dock will feature a main fixed dock of six feet by 225 feet, five fixed piers of four feet by 40 feet, one fixed pier five feet by 60 feet, one floating pier five feet by 36 feet and a total of 16 wet slips. 3. The proposed dock meets all of the dimensional requirements for a multi- use dock given the property and waterway dimensional allowances. 4. The reference to 15 wet slips was found within the written portion of the application, as the plans reflect the 16 wet slips please correct the error. 5. The written portion of the application also made reference to Beach by Design, the subject property is not applicable to these requirements. General Applicability Criteria 6. Applicant has satisfactorily addressed the required criteria. Flexibility Criteria 7. Applicant has satisfactorily addressed the required criteria. **SEE PAGE 0 ON DOCUMENT. Stormwater Review General Comments DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review. Additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. **SEE PAGE 4 ON DOCUMENT. 1/7/2016 41 DRC ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMXI'IVE AcnON EMPLOYER" 4:00 PM Case number: FLD2015-11047--877 BAY ESPLANADE Owner(s): Cherie J Troyen 329 Dorset St S Burlington, VT 05403 621 PHONE: No phone, Fax: No fax, Email: No email Applicant: Cherie Troyen 329 Dorset St S Burlington, VT 05403 621 PHONE: (802) 372-8808, Fax: No fax, Email: M.E.Schwartz @att.Net Representative: Terri Skapik Woods Consulting Inc 1714 Country Road 1 Suite 22 Dunedin, FL 34698 PHONE: (727) 919-0848, Fax: (727) 786-7479, Email: Terriskapik @woodsconsulting.Org Location: 877 Bay Esplanade consists of 0.212 acres and is located on the eastern side of Bay Esplanade approximately 50 feet south of the intersection with Kipling Plaza. Atlas Page: 249A Zoning District: Low Medium Density Residential Request: The Community Development Board (CDB) is reviewing a new dock at a single family use in the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District at 877 Bay Esplanade with a proposed length of 86 feet consistent with the permitted requirements of Section 3-601. Proposed Use: Detached Dwelling Neighborhood Clearwater Beach Association Association(s): Clearwater Neighborhood Coalition Presenter: Melissa Hauck-Baker, Senior Planner 1/7/2016 42 DRC ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMXI'IVE AcnON EMPLOYER" Workflow: Review Name Task Status Status Date Last Name Determination of Complete 12/04/2015 Hauck-Baker Completeness Traffic Eng Review No Comments 12/11/2015 Elbo Solid Waste Review No Comments 12/11/2015 Pryor Parks and Rec Review No Comments 12/15/2015 Reid Engineering Review Comments 12/15/2015 Gluski Environmental Review Comments 12/17/2015 Kessler Land Resource Review No Comments 12/22/2015 Crandall Fire Review No Review Required 12/29/2015 Schultz Planning Review Comments 12/29/2015 Hauck-Baker Stormwater Review Comments 12/30/2015 Bawany 1/7/2016 43 DRC ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMXI'IVE AcnON EMPLOYER" The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: Engineering Review General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. **SEE PAGE 0 ON DOCUMENT. Environmental Review General Notes: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Additional permits from State agencies, such as the Southwest Florida Water Management District or Florida Department of Environmental Protection, may be required. Approval does not relieve the applicant from the requirements to obtain all other required permits and authorizations. **SEE PAGE 0 ON DOCUMENT. Environmental Review Priorto issuance of Building Permit: A dock/dredge and fill permit may be required prior to conducting any additions. Contact Pinellas County Water and Navigation Authority at (727) 453-3385 for more information. **SEE PAGE 1 ON DOCUMENT. Planning Review Planning Review General Site Plan and Application Comments 1. The proposed project includes the reconstruction of the existing 86 foot long dock and boat lift to the same length but with a boat lift featuring a covered roof and reconfigured terminal platform. 2. The length and relocation of the boat lift are required to avoid the sea grass beds which extend a distance of 58 feet from the seawall. 3. The proposed dock will meet all other dimensional requirements of Section 3 -601 except for the length. 4. The application describes the method of construction as being wood for the new dock and covered boatlift, please provide the finished building materials for the proposed boatlift roof covering structure. 5. Please provide an elevation view of the proposed boatlift roof covering structure. General Applicability Criteria 6. Applicant has satisfactorily addressed the required criteria. Flexibility Criteria 7. Applicant has satisfactorily addressed the required criteria. 1/7/2016 44 DRC ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMXI'IVE AcnON EMPLOYER" Planning Review General Site Plan and Application Comments 1. The proposed project includes the reconstruction of the existing 86 foot long dock and boat lift to the same length but with a boat lift featuring a covered roof and reconfigured terminal platform. 2. The length and relocation of the boat lift are required to avoid the sea grass beds which extend a distance of 58 feet from the seawall. 3. The proposed dock will meet all other dimensional requirements of Section 3 -601 except for the length. 4. The application describes the method of construction as being wood for the new dock and covered boatlift, please provide the finished building materials for the proposed boatlift roof covering structure. 5. Please provide an elevation view of the proposed boatlift roof covering structure. General Applicability Criteria 6. Applicant has satisfactorily addressed the required criteria. Flexibility Criteria 7. Applicant has satisfactorily addressed the required criteria. **SEE PAGE 0 ON DOCUMENT. Stormwater Review General Comments DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review. Additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. **SEE PAGE 1 ON DOCUMENT. 1/7/2016 45 DRC ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMXI'IVE AcnON EMPLOYER" 4:30 PM Case number: ANX2015-12034 --2118 BELL CHEER DR Owner(s): Rios, Alejandro 2118 Bell Cheer Dr Clearwater, FL 33764-4846 PHONE: (727) 443-6623, Fax: No fax, Email: No email Applicant: 2118 Bell Cheer Dr Clearwater, FL 33764-4846 PHONE: (727) 443-6623, Fax: No fax, Email: No email Location: 0.711 acres located generally south of Druid Road, east of South Hercules Avenue, north of Nursery Road, and west of South Belcher Road. Atlas Page: 308B Zoning District: Low Medium Density Residential Request: The City Council is considering requests for voluntary annexations into the City of Clearwater. It is proposed that the properties be assigned an initial Future Land Use Map designation of Residential Low (RL) and an initial zoning category of Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR). The properties are 2118, 2142, and 2166 Bell Cheer Drive. Proposed Use: Detached Dwelling Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhood Coalition Association(s): Presenter: Kyle Brotherton, Planner 1/7/2016 46 DRC ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMXI'IVE AcnON EMPLOYER" Workflow: Review Name Task Status Status Date Last Name Determination of Complete 12/01/2015 Brotherton Completeness Planning Review No Comments 12/01/2015 Brotherton Traffic Eng Review No Comments 12/10/2015 Elbo Engineering Review Comments 12/11/2015 Simpson Parks and Rec Review No Comments 12/15/2015 Reid Environmental Review No Comments 12/17/2015 Kessler Fire Review No Comments 12/29/2015 Schultz Land Resource Review No Comments 12/30/2015 Anderson Stormwater Review No Comments 12/30/2015 Bawany The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: Engineering Review Annexation into the City of Clearwater will generate monthly stormwater utility fees. Please note, any changes to the site and/or building shall require bringing all sub-standard sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project up to standard, including A.D.A. standards (truncated domes per FDOT Index#304). 1/7/2016 47 DRC ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMXHVF AcnON EMPLOYER"