10/20/2015 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING MINUTES
CITY OF CLEARWATER
October 20, 2015
Present: Chair Brian A. Barker, Vice Chair David Allbritton, Board Member Richard
Adelson, Board Member Michael Boutzoukas, Board Member Christopher J.
Anuszkiewicz, Board Member Mary A. Lau, Board Member John Funk, Acting Board
Member John Quattrocki
Also Present: Jay Daigneault - Attorney for the Board, Camilo Soto - Assistant City
Attorney II, Michael L. Delk - Planning & Development Director, Robert Tefft -
Development Review Manager, Patricia O. Sullivan - Board Reporter
A. CALL TO ORDER, INVOCATION, PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Chair called the meeting to order at 1:00 p.m. at City Hall, followed by the
Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance.
B. ROLL CALL:
C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING: September 15, 2015
Member Allbritton moved to approve the minutes of the September 15, 2015
Community Development Board meeting as submitted in written summation. The motion
was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
D. CITIZENS TO BE HEARD, RE: ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA: None.
E. CONSENT AGENDA: The following case is not contested by the applicant,
staff, neighboring property owners, etc. and will be approved by a single
vote at the beginning of the meeting (Item 1):
Pulled from Consent Agenda
1. Case. FLD2015-08031 — 668 Mandalay Avenue Level Two Application
Owner: Somerset Vacation Townhomes
Applicant: John Pantazes, AIA, Regency Development (2551 Drew Street,
Clearwater, FL 33767; phone: (727) 726-6678; email: ipantazes(o-)-icloud.com)
Location: 0.40 acre located at the southwest corner of Mandalay Avenue and
Somerset Street.
Request: The Community Development Board is reviewing a proposed 20-room
hotel in the Tourist (T) District for the property located at 668 Mandalay Avenue.
The project is 50 feet in height, includes a minimum of 24 parking spaces and
requests allowable flexibility from setback and lot area requirements (Section 2-
803).
Community Development 10/20/2015 1
Neighborhood Associations: Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition, Clearwater
Beach Association
Presenter: Mark T. Parry, AICP, Senior Planner
Alternate Member Quattrocki declared a conflict of interest.
Attorney Carlton Ward, representing the Chalets on White Sands, requested Party
Status.
Member Funk moved to grant Party Status to Carlton Ward, as representative of the
Chalets on White Sands. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
Alternate Member Quattrocki did not vote.
Charles Attal requested Party Status.
Member Boutzoukas moved to grant Charles Attal Party Status. The motion was duly
seconded and carried unanimously. Alternate Member Quattrocki did not vote.
Susan Boschen requested Party Status.
Member Funk moved to grant Susan Boschen Party Status. The motion was duly
seconded and carried unanimously. Alternate Member Quattrocki did not vote.
Member Allbritton moved to accept Mark Parry as an expert witness in the fields of
redevelopment planning, comprehensive planning, annexation implementation, zoning,
land use/rezoning applications, land development general planning code amendments,
landscape ordinance, and special area plans/overlay districts. The motion was duly
seconded and carried unanimously. Alternate Member Quattrocki did not vote.
Senior Planner Mark Parry reviewed the Staff Report. Correspondence expressed
concerns re hours of operation and potential noise related to the project's rooftop
terrace, which will feature glass railings, 2 hotel units, 2 small dipping pools, a seating
area, and a semi enclosed bar at the northeast corner. Landscaping will buffer the
property's south border.
Bill Mazas, a property owner, said he was surprised by the complaints as he had
designed the property to be consistent with the family oriented neighborhood. He
agreed to accept conditions of approval limiting hours of operation for the roof terrace
and bar. He said the development meets all Beach by Design criteria.
Party Status Holder Carlton Ward expressed concern noise from the roof terrace and
bar will disturb nearby residents. He encouraged the CDB (Community Development
Board) to adopt conditions of approval limiting hours of operation and prohibiting live
music on the rooftop, and requiring common ownership of the hotel and bar.
Community Development 10/20/2015 2
Party Status Holder Charles Attal expressed concern the roof terrace will have
excessive activity, light, and noise. He encouraged the CDB to adopt conditions of
approval that limit excessive amplified music, prohibit valet parking, and require roof
terrace and bar patrons to be hotel guests.
Party Status Holder Susan Boschen said the 5t" floor roof terrace bar will be close to her
motel and the resulting large parties and excessive noise will put her out of business.
She said roof terrace conversations will be audible from her property. She said the
terrace should be enclosed and relocated to a lower floor in the rear. She said if the
design was not changed, she would be making numerous complaints to the Police.
Mr. Mazas said all music was amplified; he wanted to play music on the roof terrace but
did not anticipate installing large speakers. He said on site management will stop noise
after hours. He wanted to retain the right to provide valet service as a form of hospitality.
He was willing to tie ownership of the resort to the liquor license holder.
Assistant City Attorney Camilo Soto said the City would sign off on zoning to permit a
liquor license.
Party Status Holder Attal said the project's application indicated the site would not offer
valet service. He said valet service would get around parking limitations and allow large
parties to use the roof terrace.
Mr. Mazas said valet service would only be offered to hotel guests. He said the 5,000
square-foot rooftop was too small to host large groups. He said once the parking lot was
full, there would be nowhere else to park vehicles.
Mr. Parry said the City did not regulate valet parking and did not intend to prohibit valet
service at this property. The application referenced valet service to determine proper
parking space and drive aisle dimensions; parking spaces will be Code compliant.
Party Status Holder Boschen requested a condition of approval limit valet service to
hotel guests. She said the hotel will have insufficient parking. She expressed concern
amplified music on the rooftop will disturb her guests. She requested that the Board
prohibit the rooftop amenity and save the neighborhood from noise.
Two residents expressed concern that overflow parking will negatively impact North
Clearwater Beach residents.
Mr. Parry said Beach by Design encouraged overnight accommodations. The proposed
use was for a hotel, not a bar.
Community Development 10/20/2015 3
Party Status Holder Attal said the structure will border residential neighborhoods and
the rooftop bar will adversely affect nearby residents. He recommended that only
registered hotel guests be allowed to patronize the bar.
Mr. Parry reviewed additional conditions of approval agreed to by the property owner: 1)
Bar component to close at 10:00 p.m. Sunday - Thursday and 11:30 p.m. Friday -
Saturday; 2) roof terrace to close at 10:30 p.m. Sunday - Thursday and 12:00 midnight
Friday - Saturday; 3) Bar component and hotel use to have common ownership and
operations. 4) No live music on roof terrace at anytime; and 5) All amenities, including
but not limited to the roof terrace, to be solely for hotel occupants.
Mr. Mazas said the property owners had designed a nice development and were willing
to work with neighbors.
Member Funk moved to approve Case FLD2015-08031 based on the evidence and
testimony presented in the application, the Staff Report and at today's hearing, and
hereby adopt the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law stated in the Staff Report
with conditions of approval as listed plus 5 additional conditions of approval: 1) Bar
component to close at 10:00 p.m. Sunday - Thursday and 11:30 p.m. Friday - Saturday;
2) roof terrace to close at 10:30 p.m. Sunday - Thursday and 12:00 midnight Friday -
Saturday; 3) Bar component and hotel use to have common ownership and operations.
4) No live music on roof terrace at anytime; and 5) All amenities, including but not
limited to the roof terrace, to be solely for hotel occupants. The motion was duly
seconded and carried unanimously. Alternate Member Quattrocki did not vote.
F. LEVEL TWO APPLICATIONS (Items 1- 3):
1. Case: FLD2015-07029— 704 Eldorado Avenue Level Two Application
Owner: Lawrence A. Seigel
Applicant: Gerhrad Boerner (425 Cypress Creek, Oldsmar, FL 34677; phone:
(727) 789-2866; email: seacomcorp(o-)-gmail.com)
Location: 0.16 acre located on the west side of Eldorado Avenue 79 feet south of
the Acacia Street and Eldorado Avenue Intersection.
Request: The Community Development Board (CDB) is reviewing two proposed
decks for a detached dwelling in the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR)
District for the property located at 704 Eldorado Avenue. The decks are 3.3 feet
and 14.5 feet in height (above BFE) and the application requests allowable
flexibility from setbacks (Sections 2-204 and 3-905.C).
Neighborhood Associations: Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition and
Clearwater Beach Association
Presenter: Kevin W. Nurnberger, Senior Planner
Community Development 10/20/2015 4
Member Allbritton moved to accept Kevin Nurnberger as an expert witness in the fields
of zoning, site plan analysis, planning in general, and code enforcement. The motion
was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Alternate Member Quattrocki did not vote.
Senior Planner Kevin Nurnberger reviewed the Staff Report. Both decks will extend the
full width of the building. He said the author of the letter of objection was not present.
The attorney for the condo association next door and 3 condo owners had departed
Chambers; they did not object.
Attorney Gregory Seigel, on behalf of the property owners, said the request was
consistent with adjacent properties and neighborhood characteristics and enhanced the
beauty of the neighborhood. He said the request would not negatively affect health and
safety. He said more than 22 nearby properties had similar approved setbacks. He
presented photographs of the subject property and condominium building next door,
stating he had reached out to the condo association.
John Wolff, president of the condo association next door, said he had no comment.
Member Boutzoukas moved to approve Case FLD2015-07029 based on the evidence
and testimony presented in the application, the Staff Report and at today's hearing, and
hereby adopt the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law stated in the Staff Report
with conditions of approval as listed. The motion was duly seconded and carried
unanimously. Alternate Member Quattrocki did not vote.
2. Case: FLD2015-06024 — 15 Avalon Street Level Two Application
Owner: Avalon Land Holdings, LLC
Applicant: Brian J. Aungst, Jr., Esquire (625 Court Street, Clearwater, FL 33756;
phone: (727) 444-1403; email: bia(a)-macafar.com)
Location: 0.50 acre located on the south side of Avalon Street and the north side
of Kendall Street approximately 68 feet west of the Avalon Street and Mandalay
Avenue intersection and 213 feet west of the Kendall Street and Mandalay
Avenue intersection.
Request: The Community Development Board (CDB) is reviewing a proposed 22
resort attached dwellings in the Tourist (T) District for the property located at 15
Avalon Street. The project is 71.6 feet in height, includes 46 parking spaces, and
requests allowable flexibility from setback requirements, and the Design
Guidelines of Beach by Design; as well as a Transfer of Development Rights for
three dwelling units from 483 Mandalay Avenue (Sections 2-803 and 4-1403).
Neighborhood Associations: Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition and
Clearwater Beach Association
Presenter: Kevin W. Nurnberger, Senior Planner
Community Development 10/20/2015 5
James Yearout requested Party Status.
Member Boutzoukas moved to grant James Yearout Party Status. The motion was duly
seconded and carried unanimously. Alternate Member Quattrocki did not vote.
Michael Samarkos requested Party Status.
Member Anuszkiewicz moved to grant Michael Samarkos Party Status. The motion was
duly seconded and carried unanimously. Alternate Member Quattrocki did not vote.
Attorney Michael Foley, representing the Palm Pavilion, requested Party Status.
Member Allbritton moved to grant Party Status to Michael Foley, as representative of
the Palm Pavilion. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Alternate
Member Quattrocki did not vote.
Sharon Nichols, representing Villas of Clearwater Beach, requested Party Status.
Member Lau moved to grant Party Status to Sharon Nichols, as representative of Villas
of Clearwater Beach. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
Alternate Member Quattrocki did not vote.
Member Adelson moved to accept Kevin Nurnberger as an expert witness in the fields
of zoning, site plan analysis, planning in general, and code enforcement. The motion
was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Alternate Member Quattrocki did not vote.
Senior Planner Kevin Nurnberger reviewed the Staff Report. He said the requested
height of 71.6 feet exceeded the maximum permitted height in the Old Florida District
for this type of development. Staff recommended denial.
Member Funk moved to accept Wayne Wells as an expert witness in the fields of
zoning, site plan analysis, planning in general, and code enforcement. The motion was
duly seconded and carried unanimously. Alternate Member Quattrocki did not vote.
Member Funk moved to accept Bryan Karsky as an expert witness in the field of
architecture. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Alternate
Member Quattrocki did not vote.
Attorney Brian Aungst, representing the applicant, said the project was entitled to up to
75 feet in height (above Base Flood Elevation) due to its location in the Tourist District
and its use, Resort Attached Dwellings. He said the 71.6 feet height was less than
allowed; the Old Florida District of Beach by Design permitted a maximum 65 feet in
height for Attached Dwellings and a maximum 75 feet in height for Overnight
Community Development 10/20/2015 6
Accommodations. He said the project will have a non-residential flexible tourist
accommodation use.
Attorney Aungst reviewed Community Development Code definitions for Overnight
Accommodations and Resort Attached Dwellings. He said the project met the definition
of Overnight Accommodations in Code Section 8-802 and in the Old Florida District
section of Beach by Design. He said when the City Council created the Resort Attached
Dwellings use in 2009, the enacting Ordinance had legislative intent: "it is appropriate to
define and provide for the resort attached dwelling use as a permitted use within the
Tourist District in order to meet a need for varied configurations and room rates for
tourist accommodations."
Attorney Aungst reviewed the Florida Legislature and Florida Supreme Court 2009
definitions of resort dwellings and public lodging establishments. He said a Resort
Attached Dwelling was a public lodging establishment and overnight accommodation;
an Attached Dwelling use was prohibited from providing transient short term rentals.
Attorney Aungst said the City Council created the Resort Attached Dwellings use to
allow flexible transient use of Tourist District units to support tourist accommodations.
He said this project would be a tourist accommodation with varied unit configurations
and at least one unit (and possibly all units) would be offered or advertised as available
for a term of less than 31 days or one calendar month, whichever was less. He said
when adopting Ordinance 8044-99, the City Council added the Resort Attached
Dwellings use to Chart 2-100 Permitted Uses, which included Overnight
Accommodations, as nonresidential uses in the Tourist District. He said Attached
Dwellings was listed on Chart 2-100 as a residential use. He said as a nonresidential
use, Resort Attached Dwellings and Overnight Accommodations qualified for a
maximum height of 75 feet in the Old Florida District and the proposed height was
appropriate.
Attorney Aungst said when interpreting and applying the law, the CDB must adhere to
the City Council's legislative intent when creating the Resort Attached Dwellings use as
a flexible permissive use in the Tourist District. He said the Florida Legislature and
Florida Supreme Court recognized this use was similar to an Overnight Accommodation
as would be eligible for transient short term use. He said staff agreed with this concept
in the DRC (Development Review Committee) comments to this application.
Wayne Wells, representing the applicant, reviewed the hierarchy of land development
rules.
Party Status holder Michael Samarkos said he wanted the best use for this property and
opposed any variances.
Community Development 10/20/2015 7
Party Status holder James Yearout said the project was too massive for the property.
He supported a lower height or larger lot.
Party Status holder Michael Foley supported approval.
Party Status holder Sharon Nichols supported the project, stating it will be an asset.
During cross examination, Wayne Wells said only 2 uses in the Old Florida District were
listed when the City Council adopted changes to Beach by Design in 2006. He said after
the City Council adopted the Resort Attached Dwellings use in 2009, the City did not
update Beach by Design to include the use in the Old Florida District even though it
applied. He said Resort Attached Dwelling units could be overnight accommodations or
homesteaded. He said if all unit owners agree that the building should be limited to
Attached Dwellings, owners would need to request a change of use from the City, as
the building would be taller than permitted for that use.
Two residents spoke in support of the project.
Attorney Soto said the project would not offer flexibility as unit owners could not choose
to limit the building's use to Attached Dwellings due to the building's height.
Party Status holder Foley said the Palm Pavilion has been next to this empty lot for a
long time and supported the project.
Attorney Aungst encouraged the board to approve the transient use. He said as the Old
Florida District was silent on this use, height limits should be based on the Community
Development Code. He said Resort Attached Dwellings were permitted in the Old
Florida District even though Beach by Design was not amended after the City Council
adopted Ordinance 8044-99.
Mr. Nurnberger said the staff report for the Marquesa project on S. Gulfview, recently
approved by the Board, referred to that project as a mixed-use development with the
hotel component as the commercial use and the Resort Attached Dwellings as the
residential use.
Discussion ensued with comments that the Resort Attached Dwellings use allowed
significant flexibility and should be permitted in the Old Florida District. Concern was
expressed that the Board had not been provided a list of conditions of approval. As the
project was tied to its use, it was recommended that a condition require unit owners to
go to the City if they want to change the use.
Mr. Delk said staff could draft a list of conditions of approval if the Board determines the
use would be similar to overnight accommodations.
Community Development 10/20/2015 8
Attorney for the Board Jay Daigneault suggested if the Board approve the request that
they do so conditionally or with a condition of approval that the applicant and staff will
bring back conditions of approval to a future meeting.
Attorney Aungst said a condition of approval should not require every unit to be
available at all times for short term rental.
The City's concern that the building would be too tall for attached dwellings was noted.
Concerns were expressed that if unit owners choose to convert the building's use to
condominiums only, the building would cease to be a resort and would be too tall.
Member Boutzoukas moved to approve Case FLD2015-06024 based on the evidence
and testimony presented in the application, the Staff Report and at today's hearing, and
hereby make the following Findings of Fact based on said evidence: the project will
have mixed uses of resort short-term rentals and homesteaded units and hereby issue
the Conclusions of Law that the application complies with the City Community
Development Code, and request that Staff develop a list of Conditions of Approval,
including a condition that the use will not change from Resort Attached Dwellings
without further review by the City and that Staff present the list of Conditions for final
approval at our meeting next month. The motion was duly seconded and carried
unanimously. Alternate Member Quattrocki did not vote.
The meeting recessed from 3:24 to 3:37 p.m.
3. Case: FLD2015-06021 — 203 N. Glenwood Avenue Level Two Application
Owner: George R. Alexander
Applicant: Ellis Curry, Architect (1880 Magnolia Drive, Clearwater, FL 33764;
phone: (813) 598-1901; email: cuellcu(a)-aol.com)
Location: 0.349 acre located at the northeast corner of Glenwood Avenue and
Drew Street.
Request: The Community Development Board (CDB) is reviewing the proposed
conversion of a single-family dwelling into a duplex in the Low Medium Density
Residential (LMDR) District for the property located at 203 N. Glenwood Avenue.
The project is 18 feet in height and includes four parking spaces (Section 2-204).
Neighborhood Associations: Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition, Hillcrest
Neighborhood Association, Glenwood Neighbors and Skycrest Neighborhood
Association.
Presenter: Melissa Hauck-Baker, AICP, Senior Planner
Roderick Stuart requested Party Status.
Member Funk moved to grant Roderick Stuart Party Status. The motion was duly
seconded and carried unanimously. Alternate Member Quattrocki did not vote.
Community Development 10/20/2015 9
Member Allbritton moved to accept Melissa Hauck-Baker as an expert witness in the
fields of comprehensive and redevelopment planning; zoning, historic preservation, land
development and landscaping ordinance interpretation, amendment and administration;
site plan analysis and preparation. The motion was duly seconded and carried
unanimously. Alternate Member Quattrocki did not vote.
Senior Planner Melissa Hauck-Baker reviewed the Staff Report. If the structure is razed,
the property is large enough for build 2 single-family homes. The CDB was provided
correspondence re the item.
Architect Ellis Curry, representing the applicant, said the structure always had an
attached unit; the smaller unit was only 600 square-feet. He said the request was to
formalize the existing structure. He said no change to the neighborhood would occur
except for improvements to the property's landscaping.
Party Status holder Roderick Stuart said his family had lived in the neighborhood since
1925. He did not think the request was properly noticed. He expressed concern that
approval would allow construction of multi-family houses in the neighborhood and crime
would increase. He said height recently added along Drew Street caused visibility
problems for vehicles egressing the neighborhood. He said striping 4 parking spaces
would not be consistent with the neighborhood's character.
Ms. Hauck-Baker said many houses in the neighborhood, some dating back to the 1920s,
had secondary units; some had more. The subject property was registered as a single-
family residence even with its secondary unit. The request was consistent with Code. This
hearing was property noticed.
Party Status holder Stuart said the secondary unit was too small to be considered a
duplex. He expressed concern that approval would open up the neighborhood to
additional duplexes.
Mr. Curry said the structure was not being converted to a duplex as the secondary unit
previously existed. He said no one will be aware of any change to the property. He said
approval would formalize existing conditions.
In response to a concern, Planning Manager Robert Tefft said the Code required
parking spaces for duplexes to be striped.
Discussion ensued with comments that the property always had a secondary unit and
many neighborhood homes also had additional units/garage apartments. It was felt
approval of the request would not change the look or feel of the neighborhood.
Community Development 10/20/2015 10
Member Funk moved to approve Case FLD2015 -06021 based on the evidence and
testimony presented in the application, the Staff Report and at today's hearing, and
hereby adopt the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law stated in the Staff Report
with conditions of approval as listed. The motion was duly seconded and carried
unanimously.
G. ADJOURN
The meeting adjourned at 3:58 p.m.
Chair
Community Development Board
Community Development 10/20/2015 11
FORM 8B MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT FOR
COUNTY, MUNICIPAL, AND OTHER LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS
LAST NAME —FIRST NAME — MIDDLE NAME
Quattrocki
NAME OF BOARD, COUNCIL, COMMISSION, AUTHORITY, OR COMMITTEE
Community Development Board
MAILING ADDRESS
1353 Stewart Blvd
THE BOARD, COUNCIL, COMMISSION, AUTHORITY OR COMMITTEE ON
WHICH I SERVE IS A UNIT OF:
CITY
Clearwater, FL 33764
COUNTY
Pinellas
CITY III COUNTY •OTHER LOCAL AGENCY
NAME OF POLITICAL SUBDIVISION:
DATE ON WHICH VOTE OCCURRED
October 20, 2015
MY POSITION IS
• ELECTIVE p APPOINTIVE
WHO MUST FILE FORM 8B
This form is for use by any person serving at the county, city, or other local level of govemment on an appointed or elected board, council,
commission, authority, or committee. It applies equally to members of advisory and non - advisory bodies who are presented with a voting
conflict of interest under Section 112.3143, Florida Statutes.
Your responsibilities under the law when faced with voting on a measure in which you have a conflict of interest will vary greatly depending
on whether you hold an elective or appointive position. For this reason, please pay close attention to the instructions on this form before
completing the reverse side and filing the form.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 112.3143, FLORIDA STATUTES
A person holding elective or appointive county, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which
inures to his or her special private gain or loss. Each elected or appointed local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting on a mea-
sure which inures to the special gain or Toss of a principal (other than a govemment agency) by whom he or she is retained (including the
parent organization or subsidiary of a corporate principal by which he or she is retained); to the special private gain or Toss of a relative; or
to the special private gain or loss of a business associate. Commissioners of community redevelopment agencies under Sec. 163.356 or
163.357, F.S., and officers of independent special tax districts elected on a one -acre, one -vote basis are not prohibited from voting in that
capacity.
For purposes of this law, a "relative" includes only the officer's father, mother, son, daughter, husband, wife, brother, sister, father -in -law,
mother -in -law, son -in -law, and daughter -in -law. A "business associate" means any person or entity engaged in or carrying on a business
enterprise with the officer as a partner, joint venturer, coowner of property, or corporate shareholder (where the shares of the corporation
are not listed on any national or regional stock exchange).
*
ELECTED OFFICERS:
In addition to abstaining from voting in the situations described above, you must disclose the conflict:
PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of your interest in the measure on which you
are abstaining from voting; and
WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by completing and filing this form with the person responsible for recording the min-
utes of the meeting, who should incorporate the form in the minutes.
*
APPOINTED OFFICERS:
Although you must abstain from voting in the situations described above, you otherwise may participate in these matters. However, you
must disclose the nature of the conflict before making any attempt to influence the decision, whether orally or in writing and whether made
by you or at your direction.
IF YOU INTEND TO MAKE ANY ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION PRIOR TO THE MEETING AT WHICH THE VOTE WILL BE
TAKEN:
• You must complete and file this form (before making any attempt to influence the decision) with the person responsible for recording the
minutes of the meeting, who will incorporate the form in the minutes. (Continued on other side)
APPOINTED OFFICERS (continued)
• A copy of the form must be provided immediately to the other members of the agency.
• The form must be read publicly at the next meeting after the form is filed.
IF YOU MAKE NO ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION EXCEPT BY DISCUSSION AT THE MEETING:
• You must disclose orally the nature of your conflict in the measure before participating.
• You must complete the form and file it within 15 days after the vote occurs with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the
meeting, who must incorporate the form in the minutes. A copy of the form must be provided immediately to the other members of the
agency, and the form must be read publicly at the next meeting after the form is filed.
DISCLOSURE OF LOCAL OFFICER'S INTEREST
1, John Quattrocki
, hereby disclose that on October 20th 20 15
(a) A measure came or will come before my agency which (check one)
inured to my special private gain or loss;
inured to the special gain or Toss of my business associate, John Pantazes
inured to the special gain or Toss of my relative,
inured to the special gain or Toss of , by
whom 1 am retained; or
inured to the special gain or loss of , which
is the parent organization or subsidiary of a principal which has retained me.
(b) The measure before my agency and the nature of my conflicting interest in the measure is as follows:
/D- cRe -ao,5
Date Filed
Illot..�
ature
NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES §112.317, A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRED DISCLOSURE
CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: IMPEACHMENT,
REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION, REDUCTION IN SALARY, REPRIMAND, OR A
CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED $10,000.
CE FORM 8B - EFF. 1/2000
PAGE 2
TO
FROM,
COPIES,
:aater
U
Interdepartmental Correspondence Sheet
Community Development Board Members
Robert Tefft, Development Review Manager
Camilo Soto, Assistant City Attorney; Susan Chase, Documents and Records Specialist, /Pat
Sullivan, Board Reporter
SUBJECT, Agenda Items for
DATE. October 14, 2015
CDB packets being distributed contain the following,
Site investigation form
Unapproved minutes of previous meeting Septemberl 5, 2015
LEVEL TWO APPLICATIONS (ITEMS 1 -4)
1. Case: FiD2015- 07029— 704 Eldorado Avenue Presenter: Kevin W. Nurnberger, Senior Planner
Yes ,J No
2. Case: FL 2015 -06024 — 15 Avalon Street Presenter: Kevin W. Nurnberger, Senior Planner
Yes / No
3. Case: FLD2015 -06021 — 203 N. Glenwood Avenue Presenter: Melissa Hauck - Baker, AICP,
Senior Pl ner
Yes V No
4. Case: FLD2015 -08031 — 668 Mandalay Avenue Presenter: Mark T. Parry, AICP, Senior Planner
Yes No
Ihave conducted a personal investigation on the personal site visit to the following properties
Signature, - Date, t 'i
PRINT NAME
S. \Planning Department\C D BlAgendas DRC & CDBICDB12015110 October 201511 Cover MEMO 2015.doc
TO
FROM,
COPIES,
U
Interdepartmental Correspondence Sheet
Community Development Board Members
Robert Tefft, Development Review Manager
Camilo Soto, Assistant City Attorney; Susan Chase, Documents and Records Specialist, /Pat
Sullivan, Board Reporter
SUBJECT. Agenda Items for
DATE. October 14, 2015
CDB packets being distributed contain the following.
Site investigation form
Unapproved minutes of previous meeting Septemberl5, 2015
LEVEL TWO APPLICATIONS (ITEMS 1 -4)
1. CaseLD2015- 07029 - 704 Eldorado Avenue Presenter: Kevin W. Nurnberger, Senior Planner
Yes A No
2. Case: FLD2015 -06024 - 15 Avalon Street Presenter: Kevin W. Nurnberger, Senior Planner
Yes No
3. Case: FLD2015 -06021 - 203 N. Glenwood Avenue Presenter: Melissa Hauck - Baker, AICP,
Senior Planner
Yes X. No
4. Case: FLD2015 -08031 - 668 Mandalay Avenue Presenter: Mark T. Parry, AICP, Senior Planner
Yes )c No
I have conducted a personal investigation on the personal site visit to the following properties.
Signature. Date.
1GhAe4) AD'rt )v
PRINT NAME
S. \Planning Department\C D BlAgendas DRC & CDBICDBI2015110 October 201511 Cover MEMO 2015.doc
TO
FROM
COPIES,
LL
Uearwater
U
Interdepartmental Correspondence Sheet
Community Development Board Members
Robert Tefft, Development Review Manager
Camilo Soto, Assistant City Attorney; Susan Chase, Documents and Records Specialist, /Pat
Sullivan, Board Reporter
SUBJECT, Agenda Items for
DATE. October 14, 2015
CDB packets being distributed contain the following,
Site investigation form
Unapproved minutes of previous meeting Septemberl5, 2015
LEVEL TWO APPLICATIONS (ITEMS 1 -4)
1. Case: FLD2015- 07029- 704 Eldorado Avenue Presenter: Kevin W. Nurnberger, Senior Planner
Yes No
2. Case: FLD2015 -06924 - 15 Avalon Street Presenter: Kevin W. Nurnberger, Senior Planner
Yes No /��/
3. Case: FLD2015 -06021 - 203 N. Glenwood Avenue Presenter: Melissa Hauck - Baker, AICP,
Senior Planner
Yes No
4. Case: FLD2015 -080 3 668 Mandalay Avenue Presenter: Mark T. Parry, AICP, Senior Planner
Yes No
I have conducted a personal investigation on the personal site visit to the following properties
Signa ture, . / Date. , /0/ 07/C
ii .41-il
f rl«
PRINT NAME
S:\Planning Department\C D BlAgendas DRC & CDBICDBI2015110 October 201511 Cover MEMO 2015.doc
TO,
FROM.
COPIES.
Uearwater
Interdepartmental Correspondence Sheet
Community Development Board Members
Robert Tefft, Development Review Manager
Camilo Soto, Assistant City Attorney; Susan Chase, Documents and Records Specialist, /Pat
Sullivan, Board Reporter
SUBJECT, Agenda Items for
DATE. October 14, 2015
CDB packets being distributed contain the following,
Site investigation form
Unapproved minutes of previous meeting Septemberl 5, 2015
LEVEL TWO APPLICATIONS (ITEMS 1 -4)
1. Case: FL,D20 1 5- 07029— 704 Eldorado Avenue Presenter: Kevin W. Nurnberger, Senior Planner
Yes I X l No
2. Ca FLD 15 -06024 — 15 Avalon Street Presenter: Kevin W. Nurnberger, Senior Planner
Ye No
3. Case. FLD2015 -06021 — 203 N. Glenwood Avenue Presenter: Melissa Hauck- Baker, AICP,
Senal �'la •-r
Yes f No
4. Ca
Yes
2015 -08031 — 668 Mandalay Avenue Presenter: Mark T. Parry, AICP, Senior Planner
No
I have conducted a personal stigation on the personal site visit to the following properties.
Signature, / - Date, !/v _/ / /
PRINT NAME
S:\Planning Department\C D BlAgendas DRC & CDBICDBI2015110 October 201511 Cover MEMO 2015.doc
TO
FROM
COPIES:
LL
>_
Uearwater
,_
U
............,.........,......................e...................,.......
Interdepartmental Correspondence Sheet
Community Development Board Members
Robert Tefft, Development Review Manager
Camilo Soto, Assistant City Attorney; Susan Chase, Documents and Records Specialist, /Pat
Sullivan, Board Reporter
SUBJECT: Agenda Items for
DATE: October 14, 2015
CDB packets being distributed contain the following:
Site investigation form
Unapproved minutes of previous meeting Septemberl 5, 2015
LEVEL TWO APPLICATIONS (ITEMS 1 -4)
1. Case: 1 LD2015- 07029- 704 Eldorado Avenue Presenter: Kevin W. Numberger, Senior Planner
Yes ✓ No
2. Case: LD2015 -06024 - 15 Avalon Street Presenter: Kevin W. Numberger, Senior Planner
Yes If No
3. Case: FLD2015 -06021 - 203 N. Glenwood Avenue Presenter: Melissa Hauck - Baker, AICP,
Senio i lanner
Yes ✓✓ No
4. Case: LD2015 -08031 - 668 Mandalay Avenue Presenter: Mark T. Parry, AICP, Senior Planner
Yes V No
Ihave conducted a personal investigation on the personal site visit to the following properties
Signature:
CA-1-12A 5
PRINT NAME
Date,
to /Zo /?,tats
S:\Planning Department\C D BlAgendas DRC & CDBICDBI2015110 October 201511 Cover MEMO 2015.doc
TO
FROM,
COPIES
LL
Ckarwater
U
Interdepartmental Correspondence Sheet
Community Development Board Members
Robert Tefft, Development Review Manager
Camilo Soto, Assistant City Attorney; Susan Chase, Documents and Records Specialist, /Pat
Sullivan, Board Reporter
SUBJECT, Agenda Items for
DATE October 14, 2015
CDB packets being distributed contain the following.
Site investigation form
Unapproved minutes of previous meeting Septemberl5, 2015
LEVEL TWO APPLICATIONS (ITEMS 1 -4)
1. Case: 72015-07029- 704 Eldorado Avenue Presenter: Kevin W. Nurnberger, Senior Planner
Yes �/ No
2. Case: F p2015 -06024 -15 Avalon Street Presenter: Kevin W. Nurnberger, Senior Planner
Yes ✓ No
3. Case: FLD2015 -06021 - 203 N. Glenwood Avenue Presenter: Melissa Hauck - Baker, AICP,
Senior Planner
Yes ✓ No
4. Case: FLD2015 -0803 1 - 668 Mandalay Avenue Presenter: Mark T. Parry, AICP, Senior Planner
Yes ✓ No
I have con„d a . -rsonal investigation on the personal site visit to the following properties.
Signatu
0 Jr. wij
PRINT NAME
v4 T7-40c.A
Date= /, /g-o{D /5-
S:\Planning Department\C D BlAgendas DRC & CDBICDBI2015110 October 201511 Cover MEMO 2015.doc
TO
FROM
COPIES.
} ClearWater
U
Interdepartmental Correspondence Sheet
Community Development Board Members
Robert Tefft, Development Review Manager
Camilo Soto, Assistant City Attorney; Susan Chase, Documents and Records Specialist, /Pat
Sullivan, Board Reporter
SUBJECT. Agenda Items for
DATE. October 14, 2015
CDB packets being distributed contain the following.
Site investigation form
Unapproved minutes of previous meeting Septemberl5, 2015
LEVEL TWO APPLICATIONS (ITEMS 1 -4)
1. Case: F 2015- 07029- 704 Eldorado Avenue Presenter: Kevin W. Nurnberger, Senior Planner
Yes V No
2. Case: FJLb2015 -06024 - 15 Avalon Street Presenter: Kevin W. Nurnberger, Senior Planner
Yes V No
3. Case: FL 2015 -06021 - 203 N. Glenwood Avenue Presenter: Melissa Hauck - Baker, AICP,
Senior P anner
Yes No
4. Case: FJD2015 -08031 - 668 Mandalay Avenue Presenter: Mark T. Parry, AICP, Senior Planner
Yes No
I have conducted Jpersopal investigation on the personal site visit to the following properties
Signature.
70-613-1 A, LcYJ
Date. / 0 f a o /201
S:\Planning Department\C D BlAgendas DRC & CDBICDB12015110 October 2015\1 Cover MEMO 2015.doc