Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
FLD2009-03012 (RELATED TO PLT2009-00001)
46, Planning Department rwater 100 ' South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727 - 562.4567 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 ❑ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ❑ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION -Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets ❑ SUBMIT FIRE PRELIMARY SITE PLAN: $200.00 ❑ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE W CASE #: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): DATE RECEIVED: * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Residential Infill Project (Revised 07/11/2008) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT— A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4- 202.A) APPLICANT NAME: Barbara Inman, Executive Director, Habitat for Humanity of Pinellas County MAILING ADDRESS: 3071 118th Ave N St Petersburg FL 33716__ PHONE NUMBER: 727 536 -4755 FAX NUMBER: 727 209- 2191 °' F � CELL NUMBER: EMAIL: ' `1� LL PROPERTY OWNER(S): IHabitat for Humanity Of Pinellas County C-4 List ALL owners on the deed I 0 a AGENT NAME: Ronald E. Spoor, Land Development Manager MAILING ADDRESS: 3071 118th Ave N., St. Petersburg, FL 33716 PHONE NUMBER: (727) 536 -4755 ext 218 FAX NUMBER: (727) 209 -2191 CELL NUMBER: (727) 776 -2960 EMAIL: land @phfh.org B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4- 202.A) PROJECT NAME: STREET ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER(S): PARCEL SIZE (acres): LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Stevens Creek Subdivision 1888 Betty Lane 03- 29 -15- 00000 - 420 -0140 8.89 PROJECT VALUATION: $ 7,000,000 PARCEL SIZE (square feet): 387,255 Pinellas County, Florida. Please see Exhibit "A" of Warranty Deed PROPOSED USE(S): Single Family Detached Residential DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: 51 Single Family Detached Residential Houses Specifically identify the request Minimum 4,019 square feet lots (include number of units or square Minimum 40.9' wide lots footage of non - residential use and all requested code deviations; e.g. Reduce Front setback from 25 feet to 19 feet reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) CADocurnents and Settings\ derek.ferguson \Desktop\ptanning dept tones ummesroenuei unm r Jo tr—) - Page 1 of 8 DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES . NO ✓ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4- 202.A.5) ❑ SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 7) .Z D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3 -913.A ) v � t*J -crZ LW ❑ 1. L4 Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA — Explain how each criteria is ac � in 8etai fx U The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of awc propertiiss in which it is located. 0 - O The existing multi - family residential development on the site was a public housing facility and will be repli �by singe a—f i y detached residential leeve opmen with mg a aml y lots on the north es hoticing south std° anri a Genior rental 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The adjacent properties, which are single family residential and a senior housing complex are similar, compatible development The new single family development is likelv to improve the values of surrounding properties. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The existing single - family homes and a senior housing complex on surrounding adjacent properties will benefit by e replacement ot a public housing comp ex by a singe family su iviston w ere individual homeowners will 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. The road, curb and gutter of the existing multi- family development will be utilized for the redevelopment to single - family units. The total number of units will be less than the existing development (61 existing to 51 -proposed) 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The proposed single-family homes will be consistent with the surrounding community of predominantly single- family homes and a senior housing complex. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. Visual - New single - family homes; Acoustic - negligible differences over existing multi - family development; Olfactory - singe family rest antra as no a verse o ors; ours of operation - rest entia existing, rest entia CADocuments and Setfings\dere ]Lferguson\Deskfop\planning dept forms 0706kResidential Infill Project (FLD) 2006 07- 11.doc Page 2 of 8 WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Residential Infill Project Criteria) Provide complete responses to the seven (7) RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECT CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity and development standards. The project by Habitat for Humanity will provide affordable housing for families. To keep the homes affordable, Habitat would tike- toTedt�hu- cost- af-ths- dEVelopmefftbyutlircmgt ndO¢hV#ffl-stre ' sewer lines. The depth of the lots at the south property line utilizing existing street is limited to 95 feet depth including a 15 foot easement or cl I utilities; an ence the need to request variance Tor sidewalk on one aide of e road and fro n setback. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.) The existing site was a public housing multi - family residential complex that essentially depressed the surrounding property va ues. rea Ing a or a e sing e- amt y rest en la omes wou a In armony wl a jacen 3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. Single family residential is permitted within the MDR Zoning District of the City of Clearwater. Less than 5,000 square foot lots and less than 50 foot wide lots are permitted under Flexible Standard Development. 4. The uses or mix of use within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses. Adjacent properties are single-family residential and a senior housing complex which are compatible with the proposed single - family residential project. 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The developMeDt Wlll add afrordab� single family homes to an area which was oreviouslv_oc t[�iP�b�Rirhli�_ housing. Individual homeowners are more likely to take a vested Interest In their community. 6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. The demolition of the existing public housing multi- family residential project and creation of affordable i m nc on o e surroun Ing single-family m �nmmL,nitT�na the Clt r of rlP n r ter aG a v ^Thole Individual homeowners are more likely to take a vested interest in their communities. 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off -street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. Habitat for Humanity of Pinellas County is requesting the reduced lot size and lot width, allowed,within the re ur-e density is only 5.74 unitslacre. �•s p C= Q Lf) LU U ate Z 0 . C:�Documents and Settings�derek .fergusoniDesktoplplanning dept forms 07D81Res dential Inf�l Projed (FLD) 2006 07 Q y Page 3 of 8 .— 6 ; M- E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage, Design Criteria Manual and 4- 202.A.21) ® A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement ❑ If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt ❑ At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following; ❑ Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; ❑ Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; ❑ All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; ❑ Proposed stormwater detention /retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; C3 the narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. ❑ Proposed stormwater detention /retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ❑ Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ❑ COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ❑ ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following): Stormwater plan as noted above is included Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562 -4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4- 202.A) ❑ SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) — One original and 14 copies; ❑ TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) — please design around the existing trees; Included with Boundary Survey and Site Construction Plans. ❑ TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a certified arborist", of all trees 4" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees; ❑ LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; Shown on Cover Page. ❑ PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards Cie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; NIA • GRADING PLAN, as applicable; • PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evibwroo ding a final plat is provided); Included with Site Construction Plans. - 1ZPCEJN/( i) ❑ COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; NIA a — nt "LT (PIA MING PW1;f 1vr -;- -- C- Y a CLEARWAIE'N C:\)owments and Settings \derekferguson \Desktop\pla 0708%Residential IMII Project (FLD) 2006 07.17.doc Page 4 of 8 G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 202.A) 18 SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24° x 36'x: Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; _ North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; All dimensions; _ Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; _ All required setbacks; _ All existing and proposed points of access; NIA Ail required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including _ description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; _ Location of all street rights -of -way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas _ and water lines; _ All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; _ Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening _ (per Section 3- 201(D)(1) and Index #701); N/A Location of all landscape material; _ Location of all onsite and offsite storm -water management facilities; N/A Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; _ Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks; and Floor plan typicals of buildings for all Level One (flexible standard development) and Level Two approvals. A floor plan of each floor is _ required for any parking garage requiring a Level One (minimum standard and flexible standard) or Level Two approval. 11 SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: EXISTING REQUIRED PROPOSED _ Land area in square feet and acres; _ Number of EXISTING dwelling units; _ Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; _ Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the _ number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways, _ expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility _ easement; _ Building and structure heights; _ Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. 5a REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8 %X 11); rA FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: _ One -foot contours or spot elevations on site; _ Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for theL �parcel; All open space areas;���� - Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; _ Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Ito _ Streets and drives (dimensioned); pra'"ffvCT Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); r�� �p AR IN Structural overhangs; � 6!► �s �►` C:1Dowments and Settings\derek ferguson\Deskfoptplanning dept forms 07081Residential Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07- 11.doc Page 5 of 8 H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 1102.A) ❑ LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24"x 36 "): NIA. All existing and proposed structures; _ Names of abutting streets; _ Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; _ belineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Existing trees on -site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required _ tree survey); Location, size, and quantifies of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant _ schedule; Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all _ existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and _ protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and /or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. ❑ REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8'/: X 11); N /A. O COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive NIA. Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 202.A.23) ❑ BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS —with the following information; All sides of all buildings; _ Dimensioned; Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations); Materials; ❑ REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS — same as above to scale on 8'/= X 11. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3 -1806) NIA. ❑ All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. ❑ All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ❑ Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ❑ Reduced signage proposal (8'/: X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Pd MAlion. APR , 3 2utt� Of C:\Dowments and Settings\derE4 Lferguson\Desktop\planning dept fortns .1de tial��Pr�� � 008 07- 11.doc Page 6 of 8 K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4- 202.A.13 and 4- 801.C) 13 Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and /or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. • Will affect a nearby roadway segment and /or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727 -562 -4750) Refer to Section 4 -801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement E3 Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post - development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562- 4750. L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY: Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MMO I t�ex H) is required. El Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations/water study requirements (Applicant must initial or1Rb�ir g): Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included. F i J 11„ A N� _ Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is not required. PMN(" QL4- r.i:;i�NV�4,NT CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REC�1ftkff T "Rg4W& FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562 -4334. M. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. ��JM TA.�t oL . Signature of property owner or representative Barbara Inman, Executive Director STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Sworn to and subscribed before me this 91r4 day of MAP-CA , A.D. 200 to me and/or by P>A -P-+3 ate+. tJM%A-t4 , who is personally known has produced •••••O'i ■••N as identifitxtion. _ �j, � own*DDOd071sT Notary public, C My commission expires: ; • C:1Documents and Settingslderelcferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 070BResidential Infin Project (FLD) 2008 07 -11Aoc Page 7 of 8 ORIGINAL Mocuments and Settingsxderek .ferguson\Desktop\ptanning dept forme 0700d2esidential Infitl Project (FLD) 2006 07 -1 t.doc Page 9 of 8 N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: h t `,� 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed - PRINT full names: PLANNII Dr-PARTMAT Habitat for Humanity of Pinellas County C17Y OF CLEARWATER 2. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 1888 Betty Lane 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) Flexible Standard Development to construct a 52 -lot single family detached residential development. 4. That the undersigned (hasthave) appointed and (does/do) appoint Ronald E. Spoor, Land Development Manager as (his /their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. That (1 /we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and ec 0 Property Owner Property Owner t3AtteAr -A iWtl'1Rry Ec:V'ToV£ bra- fX-TOA Property Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this Ct rw day of moy'�A 1 2009 personally appeared V44r- AnQ.ta INM4N who having been first duly swom Deposes and says that he /she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he /she signed. AIr+tY P. REEK � OM" QDO1f071S7 z —� • 6�bw 7�01d01Z Notary Public Signature NularAswi. Rnc My Commission Expires: 7 Notary zo . za J z .._..., >.m ............■ ■. ■..........■ ■te Mocuments and Settingsxderek .ferguson\Desktop\ptanning dept forme 0700d2esidential Infitl Project (FLD) 2006 07 -1 t.doc Page 9 of 8 KaAitat for Humanity of Pinellas County S EKS'1 c, of, 10 \ 9 O Z W 4 ,; 50 51 nLE u SUNSET- PU/NT-ROAD TRACT'S" TOT LOT 29 42 43 44 45 46 47 i M STEVENS CREEKDRI vE TRACT "A" 1912 012112212 312 412 512 612 7 018C- STEVENS CREEK -COLOR r CUMBEY & FA /R, INC. 2463 ENTERPRISEROAD CL EAR WATER, FLORIDA 33763 PHONE: (727) 797 -8982 o 8 SION SOP DT W 4 3 2 5 6 8 7 TRACT "A" "OFL�J 34 cRE�� STEVE N S 33 W 36 35 37 32 38 41 40 39 m 31 Z STO MWAT POND 30 TRACT'S" TOT LOT 29 42 43 44 45 46 47 i M STEVENS CREEKDRI vE TRACT "A" 1912 012112212 312 412 512 612 7 018C- STEVENS CREEK -COLOR r CUMBEY & FA /R, INC. 2463 ENTERPRISEROAD CL EAR WATER, FLORIDA 33763 PHONE: (727) 797 -8982 OPJGI VAL R�11fED ." 1 2009 PLANNING t3 : unv ar Cff Y OF cLEARWA D OA EG 5 0 -7 1 / " p WINDOW5 N N BEDROOM #I © L O WIN DOW5 t �n lo O i N C L05F-T 5" N O CLOSET -cr� a 1 2" 5HELVE5 © q WINDOW5 N O N N BEDROOM # 2 — 0 cp � WINDOW5 5-8 1/8" 0 EG RE55 10'-7" 7'- 117/8° I �1 1304 m N I LPL -jN 2 m O -� 0 0 © N 1 1 3/4 °� T N O B ' 9 1/2' W m W O~ '-0 I _ CC) I pm O O L� --J /EB a m OPEN 5HELVE5 © cn I & I A I IDRYER 3" }yT 5 I /C 1 B ' -3 " 'A5H H f N DLE LALEJ G' -8 — I--- 3' -O" 3 1/2" - 1 1113 1 /2" �29— 1 2" 5HELVE5 N °a 2' -O" WIN 3 1/2n BEDROOM #3 O EGRE55 13' -7" OUTSIDE H05F- BIB CONDITION AREA= 123G S.F. 29' -9 1/2' PROVIDE 5/8 "ONE HOUR FIRE ` I I " ICF WALL T(P. RATED DRYWALL IN STORAGE/ GARAGE AREA G' -8 1/2' 22'-7" 5TORAGE 5EAL BETWEEN BOTTOM PLATE (L AND CONC. FLOOR FOR ALL WALLS GARAGE tu \ACC;"L" GARAGE AND H— G' LOWER THAN HOU5E DOOR 9' GARAGE DOOR-7'H * 9'W 3tlWH PROVIDE I G' ICF LINTEL L W/ TWO #5 BARS. EXTEND 3' -3 1/2" INTO ADJACENT WALL AND BEND BAR5 24' INTO WAU5. L05ET G 5EE 5H EET # 14 ,a I---- 3' -2' —I 9 1/2m N 54' -G 1/2" 3 1/2" 5 112" 3 1/2' KITCHEN ELEVATION = 5EE SHEET # 10 I 1'-8 1/2n 6' -O" � �-F-- 6' -0' PROVIDE H05E BIB. PANTRY OA EG 5 0 -7 1 / " p WINDOW5 N N BEDROOM #I © L O WIN DOW5 t �n lo O i N C L05F-T 5" N O CLOSET -cr� a 1 2" 5HELVE5 © q WINDOW5 N O N N BEDROOM # 2 — 0 cp � WINDOW5 5-8 1/8" 0 EG RE55 10'-7" 7'- 117/8° I �1 1304 m N I LPL -jN 2 m O -� 0 0 © N 1 1 3/4 °� T N O B ' 9 1/2' W m W O~ '-0 I _ CC) I pm O O L� --J /EB a m OPEN 5HELVE5 © cn I & I A I IDRYER 3" }yT 5 I /C 1 B ' -3 " 'A5H H f N DLE LALEJ G' -8 — I--- 3' -O" 3 1/2" - 1 1113 1 /2" �29— 1 2" 5HELVE5 N °a 2' -O" WIN 3 1/2n BEDROOM #3 O EGRE55 13' -7" OUTSIDE H05F- BIB CONDITION AREA= 123G S.F. 29' -9 1/2' PROVIDE 5/8 "ONE HOUR FIRE ` I I " ICF WALL T(P. RATED DRYWALL IN STORAGE/ GARAGE AREA G' -8 1/2' 22'-7" 5TORAGE 5EAL BETWEEN BOTTOM PLATE (L AND CONC. FLOOR FOR ALL WALLS GARAGE tu \ACC;"L" GARAGE AND H— G' LOWER THAN HOU5E DOOR 9' GARAGE DOOR-7'H * 9'W 3tlWH PROVIDE I G' ICF LINTEL L W/ TWO #5 BARS. EXTEND 3' -3 1/2" INTO ADJACENT WALL AND BEND BAR5 24' INTO WAU5. L05ET G 5EE 5H EET # 14 ,a I---- 3' -2' —I 9 1/2m N _> cn I 5EE 5HEET # 10 FOR DOOR t WINDOW SCHEDULE 2,10' J I cf) KITCHEN ELEVATION = 5EE SHEET # 10 I PROVIDE 22.5 'x3G' ATTIC ACCE55. �U a PROVIDE H05E BIB. PANTRY = ,H ELVE5 GREAT ROOM 30 REF N KITCHEN /DINING AREA 42' HIGH WALL W/ 24' ® �0 1 G" WIDE COUNTERTOP w > O 3 1 2' 9 PROVI DE 100 PRE - CA5T COLUMN G' -4 1/25 N I N PROVIDE (4) 2X I O LINTEL I I SEE SHEET # 14 CL DOOR N 0 T O 1 2' -2" WINDOWS oob ® _ 0 001") 3G" KIT HEN SINK D15HWA5HER 3G" 1:0 Lt L I 3 I/2 7' -0 1/8" C' WINDOWS GO' -1 11 TOTAL AREA UNDER ROOF = 18G7 S.F. 27' -G 1 /2" 1/4" = 1' -0" 20' -G 3/8" m n q WIN DOW5 �--- 5' -8 1 /8' 0 II O w II I" DROP i i - -� i 1= PROVIDE (4) 1.75"x 9.5" LV UNTEL 5EE 5HEET # 14 1 1 I PROVI DE 1 G "O PRE - CA5T COUJMN I I II II II — PROVIDE (4) 2X 10 UNTE 5EE 5HEET # 14 1. 8' -7 112' FLOOR PLAN SHEET 3 OF 15 i. _> cn I Q i Zf �U a PROVI DE 100 PRE - CA5T COLUMN G' -4 1/25 N I N PROVIDE (4) 2X I O LINTEL I I SEE SHEET # 14 CL DOOR N 0 T O 1 2' -2" WINDOWS oob ® _ 0 001") 3G" KIT HEN SINK D15HWA5HER 3G" 1:0 Lt L I 3 I/2 7' -0 1/8" C' WINDOWS GO' -1 11 TOTAL AREA UNDER ROOF = 18G7 S.F. 27' -G 1 /2" 1/4" = 1' -0" 20' -G 3/8" m n q WIN DOW5 �--- 5' -8 1 /8' 0 II O w II I" DROP i i - -� i 1= PROVIDE (4) 1.75"x 9.5" LV UNTEL 5EE 5HEET # 14 1 1 I PROVI DE 1 G "O PRE - CA5T COUJMN I I II II II — PROVIDE (4) 2X 10 UNTE 5EE 5HEET # 14 1. 8' -7 112' FLOOR PLAN SHEET 3 OF 15 PROVIDE BAFFELD RIDGE VENT BEGINNING @ FIRST INTERIOR TRUSS 12 12 12 12 RIDGE VENT 5 5 24` OVERHANG, TYP. 24" OVERHANG, TYP. a _° p • _ :o. d- . p , a p ° p :� Q °. ° ° ' p � .. o a:. :o p o .. •• )�� = o.�.• o° a• a .d •�• p' .. ° ° ti ° ° .. d• p p o d a . v ob, p O STUCCO BORDER AROUND WINDOWS STUCCO BORDER AROUND WINDOWS 4' -0` WALL ZONE #4 4' -0` LEFT ELEVATION TEXTURED WALLS t PAINT WALL ZONE #5, TYPICAL REAR ELEVATION ALL CORNERS. ALL OTHER WALL ZONES ARE ZONE #4. X GARAGE DOOR ;HANG, TYP. SECURE RAILING POST NO SEPT ENTRANCE CONCRETE FLOOR 42` HIGH RAILING W/ 2x6 TOP RAIL AND TWO 2x4 HORIZ. SUPPORTS AND 2x2 PICKETS W/ 4` MAX OPENING. FOR SPANS PROVIDE I G'O GREATER THAN 4' RUN CENTER PICKET PRECAST COLUMNS TO CONCRETE SLAB. FRONT ELEVATION Daniel R. Stowers P.E. Civil Engineer 5920 Bahama Way North 5t. Pete Beach Florida 33706 �OBERTS r o PE 0045052 tD STATE OF OF �SS�ONAL LNG PROVIDE BAFFELD RIDGE VENT BEGINNING @ FIRST INTERIOR TRUSS o.d. ab, 7 ° o b, TEXTURED WALLS 4 PAINT PROVIDE STUCCO TRIM AROUND WINDOWS S DOORS RIGHT ELEVATION HABITAT FOR HUMANITY FOR PINELLAS COUNTY 307I I 1 8th AVENUE NORTH 5T. PETER513URG FLORIDA 33710 PHONE: 727 53G -4755 FAX: 727 209 -2191 ELEVATION SCALE NOT TO SCALE SHEET 8 OF 15 i.— c" L► +�' r O �• c 0 U Fq i CONDITIONED FIRST FLOOR AREA (NOT INCLUDINF 5TAIR5) = 5 1 G.4 S.F. TOTAL CONDITIONED AREA (NOT INCLUDING STAIRS) = I 123.25.f. 8 -0" I tu- Lu O w 0 Pl _ tu W C� tL i ICF LINTEL SEE SHj #4 N w w w - N m J in W Z PORCH U z O U q CV G" 5TEP 03. W—ml 0 E�rffljrj FAA, w GARAGE n Lu W U-) J H z J U PLUMBING VENT TRANSITION TO SECOND - FLOOR VENT THROUGH FLOOR J015T 22'- 1 1 " 5TORAC 5TEP5 351-411 27-4' GREAT ROOM m ' -4 1/4", /4" , I I U O G W Q `o. EATING AREA w INTERIOR BEARING WALL ---� 251-G" AIR SUPPLY PLENUM, SEE SECTION A -A SHEET #4 TJ� -L-- 1' -5 "- Z- Z N mm " 3 O UP G' -3 1/2" 3.5" — 43' -4" TH05E BIB FIR5T FLOOR PLAN I an O o O cn 00 o Wi I.Mal a 18" DRAW 30" � z N N lD (V COB. 24" D15H. in 3G" © 3.5. I 3.5" 5' -1 1 /4" -I ;, KITCHEN ELEVATION5 A/4 Q �0 N 7 co cl ; 7.o a u 4 I -i 30'x48" I i I8° Li ¢ Z lul a 18" DRAW 30" � z N N lD (V COB. 24" D15H. in 3G" © 3.5. I 3.5" 5' -1 1 /4" -I ;, KITCHEN ELEVATION5 A/4 Q �0 N 7 co cl ; 7.o a u 24" OVERHANG- TYPICAL 12 12"0 COLUMN FRONT ELEVATION 'INYL SIDING Ln 9'x T GARAGE DOOR I REAR ELEVATION IN C-4 LLJ LA c*J I — — 12"0 COLUMN FRONT ELEVATION 'INYL SIDING Ln 9'x T GARAGE DOOR I REAR ELEVATION IN VINYL SIDING I x 4 MARDI PLAN TRIM, TYP. C-4 LLJ LA c*J VINYL SIDING I x 4 MARDI PLAN TRIM, TYP. d REAR ELEVATION © 0 Q 2.0 12� 12 5 5 LEFT ELEVATION �- 12° 0 COLUMN STUCCO VINYL SIDING I x 4 HARD[ PLANK TRIM, TYP. . 12 4.33 5 •1 PORCH J LEFT ELEVATION �- 12° 0 COLUMN STUCCO f ROOF FRAMING PLAN N LL'c .I s � 0 Job No. 018C Revised April 2009 STEVENS CREEK SUBDIVISION FOR HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF PINELLAS COUNTY DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS By: CUMBEY & FAIR, INC. EB 2168 2463 Enterprise Road Clearwater, FL 33763 -1790 ORIGINAL RECEIVED PLAf�[� IN 0E.�j IM4,NT CITY OF CLEARWATEA Pankaj Shah, P.E; , #21180 Stevens Creek Subdivision Project/Drainage Narrative NARRATIVE Revised April, 2009 C &F Job No.: 018C Page 1 ORIGINAL RErFIVED A" 1,11 2009 Description PLANN�t���a�* ;X AMMMT The Stevens Creek Subdivision is a proposed 51 -lot single family" res�i'�et�1�r�MVW` rnent situated on an 8.89 acre parcel. The developer of the project is Habitat for Humanity of Pinellas County. The site was an existing 61 -unit public housing complex owned by the Clearwater Housing Authority. Location The Stevens Creek Subdivision is located in central Pinellas County, Clearwater, on the southwest corner of North Betty Lane and Sunset Point Road, in Section 3, Township 29 South, Range 15 East. Wetlands and Wildlife The Stevens Creek Subdivision includes jurisdictional wetland (Springtime Branch of Stevenson Creek) that has had a Formal Wetland Determination (No. 42034468.000). Stormwater will be directed to stormwater ponds for treatment of the first '/2" of runoff and detention of the pre vs. post runoff volume for the 25 -year 24 -hour storm event prior to discharging to the wetlands. There is no proposed wetland impact. The existing site was developed as a 61 -unit public housing complex. Overall this project should not cause regional impacts to wildlife and environmental resources. FEMA The Stevens Creek Subdivision is located on FEMA FIRM Map Number 12103C0106H. A majority of the site lies within flood zone X, outside FEMA's 100 -year flood zone. The only portion lying within Flood Zone AE (EL 11.0) is contained within the jurisdictional wetlands (Springtime Branch) that will not be impacted by proposed construction. Existing Drainage Conditions The project lies within an 8.89 acre property, owned by Habitat for Humanity of Pinellas County, adjacent to the Springtime Branch of Stevenson Creek. The existing site was once a multi- family public housing unit with 16 buildings, a roadway and parking area. The site was originally constructed in the early 1980's and appears to have two existing stormwater management ponds, one (existing pond #1) on the west property line along Pineland Drive and a second (existing pond #2) at the northeast corner of the property along North Betty Lane and Sunset Point Road. The site's stormwater drainage is directed to these two existing ponds and outfalls to Springtime Branch and ultimately the intercoastal waterways of the Gulf of Mexico. These ponds to not appear to be previously permitted through SWFWMD. Stormwater drainage to the existing Pond #1 is by sheet flow and stormwater inlets at the west end of the road. Existing Pond #1 is a dry pond utilizing an underdrain /sidedrain system for treatment recovery. Evidence of this is by examination of the outfall control structure and the Stevens Creek Subdivision Project/Drainage Narrative oI�IC�I�- RECEIVED PLANKING CITY OF CLEARWATR Revised April, 2009 C &F Job No.: 018C Page 2 City of Clearwater stormwater atlas maps. The existing outfall control structure is connected to a drainage pipe along Pineland Drive which outfalls to Springtime Branch Creek. Stormwater drainage to existing Pond #2 is by sheet flow along the roadway to curb inlets along North Betty Lane prior to being redirected back to existing Pond #2. Existing Pond #2 is a dry pond which appears to utilize natural percolation to recover the treatment volume as no sign of an underdrain /sidedrain system was discovered. The existing outfall control structure is connected to Springtime Branch Creek. Existing Pond #2 commingles stormwater runoff from the project site and the public right -of -way of North Betty Lane. Proposed Drainage Conditions The property's stormwater outfall is to Springtime Branch Creek which categorizes the project as an open basin. Therefore we are designing for attenuation of the pre - developed runoff rate for the 25 -year 24 -hour storm event. The drainage system does not directly discharge to an Outstanding Florida Water (OFW), therefore treatment design is for the first one half (1/2) inch of runoff. Pre and post developed discharge rates were calculated by the Rational Method. Due to City of Clearwater stormwater regulations for redevelopment, the weir width was sized to limit the post developed discharge rate to'h that of the pre - developed for the 25 -year 24 -hour storm. Percolation tests within the pond limits of existing Pond #1 and proposed Pond #3 were not sufficient enough to recover the treatment volume within 72 hours. Therefore, pollution abatement volume will be accomplished through on -line exfiltration with a sidedrain designed to recover the '/2" of treatment volume for Pond #1 and Pond #3 within 24 hours per the City of Clearwater storm drainage design criteria. Existing Pond #1 has been reconfigured to provide the treatment and attenuation for the proposed contributing basin. The outfall control structure has been replaced to meet the design parameters described above. The sidedrain will be replaced to meet current City of Clearwater requirements for recovery of the treatment volume. The contributing basin for Pond #1 will be reduced over the pre - developed drainage basin (Basin Pre Pond #1 = 4.45 acres, Basin Post Pond #1 = 3.33 acres). Also, the overall impervious area and vehicular use area will be reduced as well (Existing impervious area = 1.97 acres, proposed impervious area = 1.26 acres). Proposed Pond #3 and its contributing basin are proposed to compensate for the reduction of the drainage areas to the existing Pond #1 and Pond #2. Pond #3 will meet the criteria for treatment and attenuation as mentioned above. Ponds #1 and #3 will provide the equivalent treatment volume for the entire redeveloped site acreage of 8.11 acres as discussed with both SWFWMD and City of Clearwater staff. As discussed with SWFWMD and City of Clearwater staff, existing Pond #2 will not be altered or analyzed due to its use as part of the drainage system for the public right -of- way of North Betty Lane which is not under the owners control. However, the contributing basin for the on -site project area will be reduced significantly over the pre - developed drainage basin (Basin Pre Pond #2 = 2.90 acres, Basin Post Pond #2 = 1.52 acres). The overall impervious area and vehicular use area will be reduced as well (Existing impervious = 1.15 acres, proposed impervious area = 0.58 acres). Stevens Creek Subdivision Project/Drainage Narrative Maintenance Revised April, 2009 C&F Job No.: 018C Page 3 The project and stormwater management facilities will be operated and maintained by the developer, Habitat for Humanity of Pinellas County, until ownership transfers to a Home Owners Association. Draft Articles of Incorporation and Declaration of Covenants and Easements is included for SWFWMD review. They will be recorded prior to ownership transfer. Analysis Conclusion The proposed stormwater management system was designed and calculated utilizing the rational method (see the Drainage Calculations provided). The stormwater management system recovers the treatment volume within 36 hours and reduces the discharge rate from the pre - developed 25 -year 24 -hour storm. Results are as follows: To Pond #1 To Pond #3 Pre - Developed (25 -yr) Q* = 8.91 cfs Q**= 4.82 cfs Post - Developed (25 -yr) Q = 7.92 cfs Q = 3.72 cfs *Based on' /Z pre - developed runoff rate for the City of Clearwater. Actually Q = 17.82 cfs. * *Based on assumption of C value of existing land as all natural land, no impervious area. Treatment Recovery Time: Pond #1 = 23.7 Hours < 24 Hours required Pond #3 = 23.6 Hours < 24 Hours required 0% RMEwED Al. A . 3 Me PLANNING& P 4l !&WT CRY OFtLWWAIER 4.0 WATER QUALITY & ATTENUATION CALCULATIONS (RATIONAL METHOD) Opoltec z or gi O� �L PRE /POST BASIN SUMMARY Project: 018C Stevens Creek Subdivision By: Location: Pinellas County Checked: PRE - DEVELOPED Pre Pond #1 4.45 Ac. Pre Pond #2* 2.90 Ac. Pre Spring Creek 0.86 Ac. Pre PineLand 0.68 Ac. 8.89 Ac. BASIN AREAS KLK Date: 4/1/2009 Date: POST - DEVELOPED Post Pond #1 3.33 Ac. Post Pond #2* 1.52 Ac. Post Spring Creek 0.78 Ac. Post PineLand 0.00 Ac Pond #3 3.26 Ac. 8.89 Ac. *On -site area only. Does not Include right -of -way for North Betty Lane. J: \jn- C \018C \Drainage \Excel \RAI Resubmittal- 0409 \Pre -Post Basin Summary.xls 4/6/2009 rn N �ya C,0 UJ __4 I FU ei Z5,� �. J: \jn- C \018C \Drainage \Excel \RAI Resubmittal- 0409 \Pre -Post Basin Summary.xls 4/6/2009 STORMWATER CALCULATIONS PROJECT NAME: Stevens Creek Subdivision - Pond #1 PROJECT NUMBER: 018C FILENAME: J: \jn- C \018C\Drainage\Excel\RAI Resubmittal- 0409 \[Underdrain Design- PRE- DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS C' AVERAGE* = 0.27 *Due to redevelopment criteria for the City of Clearwater. CONCENTRATION TIME = 15 MINUTES PRE DEV DISCHARGE Pond #1 Basin RAINFALL (IN/HR) 7.40 (PER FDOT ZONE 6 25YR) COEFFICIENT 0.27 AREA (AC) 4.45 Q PRE = 8.91 cfs ALLOWABLE DISCHARGE Page 1 of 4 12:11 PM 1-t— C" p C= I C,j � LLI U 0 AREA PRODUCT LAND USE (ft-2) 'C' C x A IMPERVIOUS 85,725 0.95 81,439 PERVIOUS 105,751 0.20 21,150 STORM WATER POND 2,350 1.00 2,350 TOTAL 193,826 104,939 'C' AVERAGE = 0.54 C' AVERAGE* = 0.27 *Due to redevelopment criteria for the City of Clearwater. CONCENTRATION TIME = 15 MINUTES PRE DEV DISCHARGE Pond #1 Basin RAINFALL (IN/HR) 7.40 (PER FDOT ZONE 6 25YR) COEFFICIENT 0.27 AREA (AC) 4.45 Q PRE = 8.91 cfs ALLOWABLE DISCHARGE Page 1 of 4 12:11 PM 1-t— C" p C= I C,j � LLI U 0 STORMWATER CALCULATIONS PROJECT NAME: Stevens Creek Subdivision - Pond #1 PROJECT NUMBER: 018C FILENAME: J: \jn- C \018C\Drainage\Excel \RAI Resubmittal- 0409 \[Underdrain Design- POST - DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS AREA PRODUCT LAND USE (ft ^2) 'C' C x A IMPERVIOUS 54,804 0.95 52,064 PERVIOUS 87,906 0.20 17,581 STORM WATER POND 2,350 1.00 2,350 TOTAL 145,060 'C' AVERAGE = CONCENTRATION TIME ** = * *Minimum required by the City of Clearwater. 1/2" RUNOFF = 6,044 ft-3 71,995 0.50 60 minutes Page 2 of 4 12:11 PM C" _ L C� nc Z 0 6 STORMWATER CALCULATIONS PROJECT NAME: Stevens Creek Subdivision - Pond #1 PROJECT NUMBER: 018C FILENAME: J: \jn- C \018C\Drainage\Excel\RAI Resubmittal- 0409 \[Underdrain Design- 12:11 PM ALLOWABLE DISCHARGE RAINFALL (IN/HR) 7.40 (PER FDOT ZONE 6 25YR) Q' PRE = 8.91 cfs ALLOWABLE DISCHARGE MODIFIED RATIONAL METHOD (POST DEVELOPED) 25 YEAR FREQUENCY ZONE 6 RAINFALL RAINFALL RAINFALL REQUIRED TREATMENT = 6,044 ft-3 DURATION INTENSITY DURATION INFLOW OUTFLOW STORAGE (minutes) (in/hr) (hours) (cfs) (cfs) (ft-3) 10 8.40 0.17 13.88 8.91 2,982 15 7.40 0.25 12.23 8.91 2,985 20 6.50 0.33 10.74 8.91 2,195 30 5.40 0.50 8.93 8.91 21 45 4.40 0.75 7.27 8.91 0 60 3.70 1.00 6.12 8.91 0 75 3.25 1.25 5.37 8.91 0 90 2.90 1.50 4.79 8.91 0 105 2.60 1.75 4.30 8.91 0 120 2.40 2.00 3.97 8.91 0 150 2.04 2.50 3.37 8.91 0 180 1.80 3.00 2.98 8.91 0 240 1.50 4.00 2.48 8.91 0 360 1.12 6.00 1.85 8.91 0 480 0.93 8.00 1.54 8.91 0 720 0.70 12.00 1.16 8.91 0 960 0.57 16.00 0.94 8.91 0 1200 0.50 20.00 0.83 8.91 0 1440 0.44 24.00 0.73 8.91 0 STORAGE SUMMARY REQUIRED 25 YEAR STORAGE = 2,985 ft-3 REQUIRED TREATMENT = 6,044 ft-3 TOTAL REQUIRED STORAGE = 9,029 ft ^3 © cm cue _ tx CY3CU LL cu 0 le z �U Page 3 of 4 STORMWATER CALCULATIONS PROJECT NAME: Stevens Creek Subdivision - Pond#1 PROJECT NUMBER: 018C 0.10 DEFAULT VALUES FILENAME: J: \jn- C \018C\Drainage\Excel\RAI Resubmittal- 0409 \[Underdrain Design- 12:11 PM 'V' INCR. AREA F-- INC. VOL. OUTFLOW ELEV (ft-2) (ft-2) (ft-3) (cfs) 13.00 � 2,450 STAGE - STORAGE & STAGE - DISCHARGE 0 N F 25YR POST DEVELOPMENT 0.00 13.20 2,910 2,910 536 0 Uj 13.30 U OVERFLOW INVERT = 14.50 22 13.40 z WIDTH = 7.00 ft 0.00 13.50 t) HEIGHT = 2.00 ft 0.00 13.60 z WEIR'C' VALUE = 3.20 0.00 13.70 (� 4,060 2,278 0.00 13.80 4,290 13.00 2,450 16.00 9,350 0.10 DEFAULT VALUES 3 TOTAL 'V' INCR. AREA AREA INC. VOL. OUTFLOW ELEV (ft-2) (ft-2) (ft-3) (cfs) 13.00 2,450 2,450 0 0.00 13.10 2,680 2,680 256 0.00 13.20 2,910 2,910 536 0.00 13.30 3,140 3,140 838 0.00 13.40 3,370 3,370 1,164 0.00 13.50 3,600 3,600 1,512 0.00 13.60 3,830 3,830 1,884 0.00 13.70 4,060 4,060 2,278 0.00 13.80 4,290 4,290 2,696 0.00 13.90 4,520 4,520 3,136 0.00 14.00 4,750 4,750 3,600 0.00 14.10 4,980 4,980 4,086 0.00 14.20 5,210 5,210 4,596 0.00 14.30 5,440 5,440 5,128 0.00 14.40 5,670 5,670 5,684 0.00 14.50 5,900 5,900 ------- 6,262 0.00 1/2 INCH --- ---------------------------------------- 14.60 6,130 6,130 6,864 0.71 14.70 6,360 6,360 7,488 2.00 14.80 6,590 6,590 8,136 3.68 14.90 6,820 6,820 8,806 5.67 15.00 7,050 7,050 9,500 7.92 25yr24hr 15.10 7,280 7,280 10,216 10.41 15.20 7,510 7,510 10,956 13.12 15.30 7,740 7,740 11,718 16.03 15.40 7,970 7,970 12,504 19.13 15.50 8,200 8,200 13,312 22.40 15.60 8,430 8,430 14,144 25.84 15.70 8,660 8,660 14,998 29.45 15.80 8,890 8,890 15,876 33.20 15.90 9,120 9,120 16,776 37.11 16.00 9,350 9,350 17,700 41.15 Page 4 of 4 POND #2 NOT ANALYZED ru- C= � o a Ca ca z. z z s� � STORMWATER CALCULATIONS PROJECT NAME: Stevens Creek Subdivision - Pond #3 PROJECT NUMBER: 018C FILENAME: J: \jn- C \018C\Drainage\Excel\RAI Resubmittal- 0409 \[Rational Method Ca PRE- DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS TOTAL 'C' AVERAGE _ CONCENTRATION TIME = 142,010 28,402 0.200 15 MINUTES PRE DEV DISCHARGE Pond #3 Basin RAINFALL (IN/HR) 7.40 (PER FDOT ZONE 6 25YR) COEFFICIENT 0.20 AREA (AC) 3.26 Q PRE = 4.82 cfs ALLOWABLE DISCHARGE Page 1 of 4 01:11 PM AREA PRODUCT LAND USE (ft-2) 'C' C x A IMPERVIOUS 0 0.95 0 PERVIOUS 142,010 0.20 28,402 STORM WATER POND 0 1.00 0 TOTAL 'C' AVERAGE _ CONCENTRATION TIME = 142,010 28,402 0.200 15 MINUTES PRE DEV DISCHARGE Pond #3 Basin RAINFALL (IN/HR) 7.40 (PER FDOT ZONE 6 25YR) COEFFICIENT 0.20 AREA (AC) 3.26 Q PRE = 4.82 cfs ALLOWABLE DISCHARGE Page 1 of 4 01:11 PM iI rn cp o t Co 4 Q U Q Z o So STORMWATER CALCULATIONS PROJECT NAME: Stevens Creek Subdivision - Pond #3 PROJECT NUMBER: 018C FILENAME: J: \jn- C \018C\Drainage\Excel\RAI Resubmittal- 0409 \[Rational Method Ca POST - DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS AREA PRODUCT LAND USE (ft-2) C' C x A IMPERVIOUS 58,700 0.95 55,765 PERVIOUS 74,510 0.20 14,902 STORM WATER POND 8,800 1.00 8,800 TOTAL 142,010 'C' AVERAGE = CONCENTRATION TIME = 1/2" RUNOFF = 5,917 ft-3 79,467 0.560 15 minutes Page 2 of 4 01:11 PM F-- o �a a (D uJ U 0 Z0 o STORMWATER CALCULATIONS PROJECT NAME: Stevens Creek Subdivision - Pond #3 PROJECT NUMBER: 018C FILENAME: J: \jn- C \018C\Drainage\Excel\RAI Resubmittal- 0409 \[Rational Method Ca ALLOWABLE DISCHARGE RAINFALL (IN/HR) 7.40 (PER FDOT ZONE 6 25YR) Q' PRE = 4.82 cfs ALLOWABLE DISCHARGE MODIFIED RATIONAL METHOD (POST DEVELOPED) 25 YEAR FREQUENCY ZONE 6 RAINFALL DURATION (minutes) RAINFALL INTENSITY (in/hr) RAINFALL DURATION (hours) INFLOW (cfs) OUTFLOW (cfs) STORAGE (ft-3) 10 8.40 0.17 15.32 4.82 6,300 15 7.40 0.25 13.50 4.82 7,807 20 6.50 0.33 11.86 4.82 8,440 30 5.40 0.50 9.85 4.82 9,047 45 4.40 0.75 8.03 4.82 8,645 60 3.70 1.00 6.75 4.82 6,930 75 3.25 1.25 5.93 4.82 4,968 90 2.90 1.50 5.29 4.82 2,514 105 2.60 1.75 4.74 4.82 0 120 2.40 2.00 4.38 4.82 0 150 2.04 2.50 3.72 4.82 0 180 1.80 3.00 3.28 4.82 0 240 1.50 4.00 2.74 4.82 0 360 1.12 6.00 2.04 4.82 0 480 0.93 8.00 1.70 4.82 0 720 0.70 12.00 1.28 4.82 0 960 0.57 16.00 1.04 4.82 0 1200 0.50 20.00 0.91 4.82 0 1440 0.44 24.00 0.80 4.82 0 STORAGE SUMMARY REQUIRED 25 YEAR STORAGE = 9,047 ft-3 REQUIRED TREATMENT = 5,917 ft-3 TOTAL REQUIRED STORAGE = 14,964 ft-3 Page 3 of 4 01:11 PM F-- N p •-+ U S Z �U STORMWATER CALCULATIONS PROJECT NAME: Stevens Creek Subdivision - Pond #3 8,800 PROJECT NUMBER: 018C 17.50 FILENAME: J: \jn- C \018C\Drainage\Excel\RAI Resubmittal- 0409 \(Rational Method Ca 01:11 PM DEFAULT VALUES 3 TOTAL c" cm ' & STAGE- DISCHARGE in cp N MCA.,, STAGE - STORAGE 25YR POST DEVELOPMENT (D u.J ELEV (ft-2) 2(x (ft-3) OVERFLOW INVERT = 16.40 0 8,800 WIDTH = 2.50 ft 0 0.00 HEIGHT = 0.60 ft 9,065 (� WEIR'C' VALUE = 3.20 0.00 15.70 15.50 8,800 17.50 14,100 0.10 DEFAULT VALUES 3 TOTAL 'V' INCR. AREA AREA INC. VOL. OUTFLOW ELEV (ft-2) (ft-2) (ft-3) (cfs) 15.50 8,800 8,800 0 0.00 15.60 9,065 9,065 893 0.00 15.70 9,330 9,330 1,813 0.00 15.80 9,595 9,595 2,759 0.00 15.90 9,860 9,860 3,732 0.00 16.00 10,125 10,125 4,731 0.00 16.10 10,390 10,390 5,757 0.00 16.15 10,523 10,523 6,280 0.00 16.20 10,655 10,655 6,809 0.00 16.30 10,920 10,920 7,888 0.00 16.40 11,185 11,185 8,993 --- - - - - -5 0.00 1/2 INCH - - - - -- --- 7- -------------- 16.50 11450 - - - - -- 1,450 11,450 10,125 715 0.25 16.60 11,715 11,715 11,283 0.72 16.70 11,980 11,980 12,468 1.31 16.80 12,245 12,245 13,679 2.02 16.90 12,510 12,510 14,917 2.83 17.00 12,775 12,775 16,181 3.72 25yr24hr 17.10 13,040 13,040 17,472 4.57 17.20 13,305 13,305 18,789 5.11 17.30 13,570 13,570 20,133 5.59 17.40 13,835 13,835 21,503 6.04 17.50 14,100 14,100 22,900 6.46 Page 4 of 4 C &F Job No. 018C April 2009 Stevens Creek Subdivsion Supplemental Drainage Calculations for the City of Clearwater: Total Property = 8.89 Acres Unaltered Spring Creek Basin = 0.78 Acres Redeveloped Area = 8.11 Acres Water Quality (Overall Site): Treatment of the first 1/2" of runoff from the Redeveloped area. Contributing Basin Area = 353,270 SF (8.11 acres) 1/2" (353,270) x 1/12 = 14,720 cf Required Treatment Volume Provided: Pond #1 (between EL. 13.0 and 14.0) = 6,262 cf Pond #3 (between EL. 15.5 and 16.4) = 8,993 cf Total Treatment Volume Provided = 15,255 cf 15,525 cf Provided > 14,720 cf Required: Design OK ®� L� M (;r-+ .- e to C &F Job No. 018C April 2009 Stevens Creek Subdivsion Supplemental Drainage Calculations for the City of Clearwater: Water Quantity (Attenuation /Detention) Pond #1: Pond #1 (Existing Pond to be Modified): Pre Pond #1 = 4.45 Acres (Area) Pre C =0.54 '/2 Pre C = 0.27 (per City of Clearwater Redevelopment Standards) i = 3.6 in /hr (per FDOT Zone 6 graph for 1 hour duration of 25 -yr storm) Pre - developed runoff rate Qpre: Q = (0.27)(3.6)(4.45) = 4.34 cfs Post Pond #1 = 3.33 Acres (Area) Post C = 0.50 Post - developed runoff rate Qpre: Q = (0.5)(3.6)(3.33) = 5.99 cfs Required Detention Volume: Delta Q = 5.99 — 4.34 = 1.65 cfs V = Delta Q x 60 minutes In V= 1.65 cfs x 60 min X 60 sec = 5,940 cf 9,500 cf Provided (at EL 15.0) > 5,940 cf Required: Design OK C C= ' L Ca _r :a- im Q C &F Job No. 018C April 2009 Stevens Creek Subdivsion Supplemental Drainage Calculations for the City of Clearwater: Water Quantity (Attenuation /Detention) Pond #3: Pre Pond #3 = 3.26 Acres (Area) Pre C = 0.20 (Considered in natural state to be conservative) i = 3.6 in /hr (per FDOT Zone 6 graph for 1 hour duration of 25 -yr storm) Pre - developed runoff rate Qpre: Q = (0.20)(3.6)(3.26) = 2.35 cfs Post Pond #1 = 3.26 Acres (Area) Post C =0.56 Post - developed runoff rate Qpre: Q = (0.56)(3.6)(3.26) = 6.57 cfs Required Detention Volume: Delta Q = 6.57 — 2.35 = 4.22 cfs V = Delta Q x 60 minutes V= 4.22 cfs x 60 min X 60 sec = 15,192 cf 16,181 cf Provided (at EL 17.0) > 15,192 cf Required: Design OK CO CA _3 C?rx�20 50 5.0 SIDE DRAIN CALCULATIONS ca c � CYD c� w c � 0 = � Variable Filter Area Site Data Blue Numbers; = Input data Red Numbers = Answers Project area = Rainfall runoff depth = Required treatment volume = Underdrain pipe length (LP) = Underdrain pipe diameter = Manning's n = Total bleeddown time = Pond Volume okay? Recovery time okay? 3.33 acres A _ inches (OFW ?) B = cubic feet C = feet inches Area of pond at elevation A = hours Area of pond at elevation B = Average pond surface area AR= Maximum Filter Flow Length = 14:50 ft. - Elevation of the top of water quality treatment volume ft. - Elevation of the bottom of the treatment volume or the pond ft. - Underdrain invert elevation ft. - Distance from bottom (B) to the centerline of the underdrain Darcy's k (ft/hr) square feet square feet square feet feet - flow length through the filter media (2' minimum). >0.50 11.3:00 6,044 `12.25 =60 0 0.50 6 5.42 0.010 Of;5;900 23.69 = >r2'450 Yes 4,175 Yes "; x: 2:00 Underdrain pipe size okay? Yes Underdrain invert elevation okay? Yes WATER ELEV. (FT.) TOT. HEAD (h) (FT.) INCR. HEAD (FT.) DER VOL. (V) (CU.FT.) INCR. VOL. (CU.FT.) FILTER FLOW LENGTH L (FT.) HYD. GRAD. i = h /LP FILTER AREA AF= L x H FLOW Q =kiAF (CFH) AVG. FLOW (QI +Q2) /2 (CFH) [NCR. TIME (HRS) TOTAL TIME (HRS) 14.50 2.00 6,076 2.00 1.0000 135 732 0.25 1,331 650 2.05 2.05 14.25 1.75 4,745 2.00 0.8750 120 569 0.25 1,207 498 2.42 4.47 14.00 1.50 3,537 2.00 0.7500 105 427 0.25 1 1,081 1 366 2.961 7.43 13.75 1.25 2,456 2.00 0.6250 90 305 0.25 953 254 3.75 11.18 13.50 1.00 1,503 2.00 0.5000 75 203 0.25 820 163 5.04 16.22 13.25 0.751 683 1 2.00 0.3750 60 122 0.25 683 91 7.47 231 13.00 0.50 0 1 2.001 0.25001 451 61 ORIGINAL. RECEIVED Ai-'R 13 2009 PLAWYNS P OVS-M04T CRY OF CL i� Variable Filter Area Site Data Blue Numbers `° = input data Red Numbers = Answers Project area = Rainfall runoff depth = Required treatment volume = Underdrain pipe length (LP) _ Underdrain pipe diameter = Manning's n = Total bleeddown time = Pond Volume okay? Recovery time okay? 3.26 acres A = inches (OFW ?) B = cubic feet C = feet inches Area of pond at elevation A =F77752,510 hours Area of pond at elevation B =1 Average pond surface area AR = Maximum Filter Flow Length = 16.40 ft. - Elevation of the top of water quality treatment volume ft. - Elevation of the bottom of the treatment volume or the pond ft. - Underdrain invert elevation ft. - Distance from bottom (B) to the centerline of the underdrain Darcy's k (ft/hr) square feet square feet square feet feet - flow length through the filter media (2' minimum). 0.50 15.50 5,917 ';,, ',<,14:75 - = ' 150.0 0.50 TOTAL TIME (HRS) 5.42 : '0.010 23.60 8 800 Yes 10,655 Yes ; :;;;:';x::2:00 Underdrain pipe size okay? Yes Underdrain invert elevation okay? Yes WATER ELEV. (FT.) TOT. HEAD (h) (FT.) INCR. HEAD (FT.) DER VOL. (V) (CU.FT.) INCR. VOL. (CU.FT.) FILTER FLOW LENGTH L (FT.) HYD. GRAD. i = h /LP FILTER AREA AF= L x H FLOW Q =kiAF ( CFH) AVG. FLOW (Ql +Q2) /2 ( CFH) INCR. TIME (HRS) TOTAL TIME (HRS) 16.40 1.40 9,541 2.00 0.7000 2481 939 0.15 1,810 1 851 2.13 2.13 16.25 1.25 7,730 2.00 0.6250 225 762 0.15 1,724 683 2.52 4.65 16.10 1.10 6,007 2.00 0.5500 203 604 0.15 1 1,636 534 3.071 7.72 15.95 0.95 4,371 2.00 0.4750 180 463 0.15 1,547 1 402 3.84 11.56 15.80 0.80 2,823 2.00 0.4000 158 341 0.15 1,457 290 5.03 16.60 15.65 0.651 1,366 1 2.00 0.3250 135 238 0.151 1 1,3661 195 7.00 23160 15.501 0.501 1 01 1 2.00 0.2500 113 1521 1 RECEKD APR 13 2009 P'AN �t"JI 6- DS -"'Y V=T CRY OF CLEARWATi EM Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2.20) Copyright 1995, Streamline Technologies, Inc. STEVENSON CREEK - EXISTING CONDITIONS 25 YEAR, 24 HOUR STORM r * * *+t * * * ** Node maximum Conditions - 025Y24H [3) RECEND 13 2009 -CITY OF CL .� (Time units - hours) Node Group Max Time Max Stage Warning Max Delta Max Surface Max Time Max Inflow Max Time Max Outflow Name Name Conditions (ft) Stage (ft) Stage (ft) Area (sf) ------- ------- Inflow - (cfs) Outflow ---- _-- -(cfs) --- N4122 -------- - - ----- UPPER --------------- 12.46 35.94 ----- ---- - -- 0.00 --- -- -- - -- ------ - 0.0844 40792.64 12.00 39.87 12.03 20.05 N4123 UPPER 15.10 53.60 0.00 0.0267 342.98 13.51 22.33 15.01 38.96 N4125 UPPER 13.49 60.46 0.00 0.0008 137516.51 12.25 94.32 13.51 22.33 N4126 UPPER 13.32 38.76 0.00 -0.0724 91546.55 12.00 25.04 15.03 22.62 N4128 UPPER 13.51 39.40 0.00 0.0005 30567.09 12.00 11.65 15.11 2.85 N4130 UPPER 12.29 45.01 0.00 0.0489 12550.13 12.26 70.16 12.28 69.53 N4131 UPPER 12.27 45.69 0.00 0.0246 9023.73 12.25 49.68 12.26 49.27 N4132 UPPER 12.25 46.90 0.00 0.0880 3580.66 12.25 35.84 12.25 35.79 N4133 UPPER 12.29 47.11 0.00 0.0269 3398.80 13.33 20.11 11.84 21.98 N4135 UPPER 12.65 48.24 0.00 -0.0248 1185.46 12.50 13.02 13.33 18.71 N4136 UPPER 13.24 53.72 0.00 0.0016 18171.17 12.00 32.06 13.24 3.83 N4137 UPPER 12.79 55.20 0.00 0.0010 14113.19 12.00 17.35 12.79 4.13 N4138 UPPER 12.70 46.58 0.00 0.0015 47781.01 12.25 46.98 13.25 19.87 N0500 LOSPRING 13.49 6.22 0.00 0.0011 14256.68 15.20 813.22 15.16 818.59 N0510 LOSPRING 13.53 6.75 0.00 0.0012 15242.29 15.21 809.20 15.20 813.22 N0520 LOSPRING 13.53 6.80 0.00 0.0011 14154.24 15.23 799.06 1.5.22 802.44 N0530 LOSPRING 13.68 9.36 0.00 - 0.0042 9614.47 15.23 796.90 15.23 799.06 N0540 LOSPRING 13.75 10.50 0.00 0.0027 40069.89 15.09 789.11 15.23 796.90 N0550 LOSPRING 13.76 10.61 0.00 0.0025 72253.40 12.45 808.10 15.09 789.11 N0560 LOSPRING 13.76 10.67 0.00 0.0028 18097.53 15.08 753.70 15.08 756.07 LOSPRING > 13.78 1-0.80 ) 0.00 0.0225 2652.85 15.08 753.37 15.08, 753.70 �N0570 N0580 LOSPRING 13.85 12.64 0.00 - 0.0227 7549.40 15.08 749.34 15.08 751.27 N0590 LOSPRING 13.85 12.73 0.00 - 0.0019 7553.20 15.09 740.43 15.08 741.99 N0600 LOSPRING 13.93 13.79 0.00 0.0023 14128.20 15.09 738.76 15.09 740.43 H0610 LOSPRING 13.94 13.90 0.00 0.0020 235868.11 12.51 833.77 15.09 738.76 N0620 LOSPRING 13.73 14.22 0.00 0.0023 330985.79 12.56 854.73 12.83 724.18 N0630 LOSPRING 12.72 15.33 0.00 0.0203 12534.21 12.58 813.52 12.59 810.87 N0650 LOSPRING 13.65 16.89 0.00 0.0005 2633.50 13.56 13.62 13:63 13.59 N0660 LOSPRING 13.59 17.39 0.00 0.0003 2797.19 13.50 13.63 13.56 13.62 N0670 LOSPRING 13.50 19.65 0.00 0.0004 64615.40 12.25 28.50 13.50 13.63 N0680 LOSPRING 13.99 13.91 0.00 0.0020 200030.18 12.34 212.75 17.15 88.07 N0690 LOSPRING 14.00 13.91 0.00 0.0041 261228.38 12.25 266.65 12.34 212.75 N0700 LOSPRING 12.02 16.71 0.00 0.0006 21145.23 12.00 31.63- 12.02 30.30 N0710 LOSPRING 12.25 16.39 0.00 0.0005 24419.90 12.00 18.57 12.25 9.05 N0720 LOSPRING 12.01 18.82 0.00 0.0016 5258.42 12.00 38.69 12.06 39.94 N0730 LOSPRING 12.32 19.61 0.00 0.0006 13296.03 12.00 9.67 12.43 3.98 N0740 LOSPRING 13.96 13.92 0.00 0.0031 41452.87 12.58 142.03 15.09 113.32 N0750 LOSPRING 13.96 13.92 0.00. 0.0013 105151.40 12.63 150.09 12.58 142.03 N0760 LOSPRING 13.98 13.96 0.00 0.0008 181339.81 12.50 156.75 12.64 138.66 N0770 LOSPRING 13.95 14.01 0.00 0.0088 2495.56 12.28 79.33 12.28 75.73 N0775 LOSPRING 13.38 15.08 0.00 0.0051 170.38 12.33 68.84 12.28 70.48 N0780 LOSPRING 12.79 15.32 0.00 0.0025 265.42 12.33 69.96 12.33 68.84 N0790 LOSPRING 13.37 15.49 0.00 0.0023 130.48 16.81 42.74 16.44 42.99 N0800 LOSPRING 14.60 18.58 0.00 0.0007 214530.20 14.42 162.19 16.47 59.28 N0810 LOSPRING 14.60 18.59 0.00 - 0.0071 10310.75 12.28 80.78 14.57 148.60 N0820 LOSPRING 14.61 18.59 0.00 0.0088 7699.72 14.54 109.16 16.74 77.76 N0830 LOSPRING 14.60 18.60 0.00 - 0.0079 5997.61 12.25 60.55 14.54 109.16 Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2.20) 1995, Streamline Technologies, Inc. N CREEK - EXISTING CONDITIONS , 24 HOUR STORM I3I �L.�N�!��,� CA'Y01 Node Maximun Conditions - 10OY24H ;(Time units - hours) 3' Node Group Max Time Max Stage Warning Max Delta Max Surface Max Time Max Inflow Max Time Max Outflow Name 4- Name Conditions (ft) Stage (ft) Stage (ft) Area (sf) Inflow (cfs) Outflow (cfs) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- y "N4122 UPPER 12.71 36.65 0.00 = 0.0952 67278.43 12.00 55.94 11.88 19.88 ' �94123 UPPER 16.11 53.83 0.00 - 0.0509 342.73 13.71 24.12 16.01 39.03 <;:'H4125 UPPER 13.71 61.64 0.00 0.0010 166692.26 12.25 134.46 13.71 24.12 :11 -N4126 UPPER 13.27 39.27 0.00 - 0.0277 99494.63 12.00 35.27 15.93 21.52 94128 UPPER 13.53 40.00 0.00 0.0007 32686.59 12.00 15.94 15.78 3.19 94130 UPPER 12.28 45.17 0.00 0.0505 14544.64 12.25 98.68 12.28 97.95 %i'�N4131 UPPER 12.26 45.87 0.00 0.0240 9858.15 12.25 69.45 12.26 68.98 ii'; N4132 UPPER 12.25 47.03 0.00 0.0885 3587.84 12.08 51.22 12.25 50.15 far N4133 UPPER 12.58 47.32 0.00 0.0293 1723.61 12.57 38.30 12.58 38.29 `.'N4135 UPPER 12.58 53.43 0.00 - 0.0230 2239.25 12.48 32.63 12.58 31.37 '94136 UPPER 12.54 54.69 0.00 0.0023 18223.72 12.00 44.51 12.50 19.17 N4137 UPPER 12.86 56.45 0.00 0.0014 14181.35 12.00 23.84 12.89 5.03 N4138 UPPER 12.87 47.66 0.00 0.0019 81894.89 12.25 70.89 13.56 21.60 90500 LOSPRING 13.51 7.44 0.00 0.0013 15911.21 14.28 927.91 14.78 928.46 N0510 LOSPRING 13.58 8.78 0.00 0.0016 18952.82 14.78 916.03 14.28 927.91 90520 LOSPRING 13.58 8.76 0.00 0.0013 18941.54 14.79 897.08 14.78 905.00 N0530 LDSPRING 13.68 10.68 0.00 - 0.0042 10532.84 14.62 895.41 14.79 897.08 N0540 LOSPRING 13.75 11.51 0.00 0.0028 46970.28 14.62 891.89 14.62 895.41 N0550 LOSPRING 13.75 11.62 0.00 0.0026 82680.96 12.39 911.47 14.62 891.89 N0560 LOSPRING 13.76 11.65 0.00 0.0026 20037.26 17.10 857.30 17.08 858.01 , ��G 13.80 X 80 0.00 0.0222 2787.97 17.10 857.20 17.10 857.30 N0580 LOSPRING 14.49 15.19 0.00 - 0.0234 7549.40 17.10 854.31 17.10 855.28 N0590 LDSPRING 14.51 15.23 0.00 0.0025 7553.20 17.12 846.15 17.12 847.07 N0600 LOSPRING 14.59 15.43 0.00 0.0020 14128.20 17.12 844.56 17.12 846.15 N0610 LOSPRING 14.61 15.48 0.00 0.0018 266487.60 14.08 977.04 17.12 844.56 90620 LDSPRING 14.41 15.72 0.00 0.0021 386784.28 12.52 1182.81 12.81 970.21 90630 LDSPRING 12.70 16.66 0.00 0.0194 13721.52 12.52 1121.42 12.52 1117.91 N0650 LDSPRING 13.09 17.61 0.00 - 0.0023 3255.84 13.15 21.95 13.09 24.69 NO660 LDSPRING 13.10 17.90 0.00 0.0004 3508.78 13.33 21.07 13.15 21.95 N0670 LOSPRING 13.35 20.17 0.00 0.0005 69596.38 12.25 40.04 13.33 21.07 N0680 LDSPRING 14.66 15.49 0.00 0.0019 251640.01 12.29 337.22 19.55 69.90 90690 LOSPRING 14.66 15.49 0.00 - 0.0054 347664.89 12.25 398.12 12.29 337.22 N0700 LOSPRING 12.02 16.77 0.00 0.0006 21333.46 12.00 43.40 12.02 41.80 N0710 LOSPRING 12.31 16.78 0.00 0.0007 26631.46 12.00 25.88 12.31 10.75 N0720 LOSPRING 12.01 19.05 0.00 0.0020 6074.52 12.00 61.01 12.04 62.20 N0730 LDSPRING 12.33 20.05 0.00 0.0008 14187.63 12.00 13.55 12.48 5.45 N0740 LDSPRING 14.61 15.53 0.00 0.0028 41452.87 12.28 167.30 14.67 248.86 N0750 LDSPRING 14.61 15.50 0.00 0.0012 214706.24 12.34 185.70 12.28 167.30 N0760 LOSPRING 14.61 15.51 0.00 0.0007 442250.25 12.50 211.13 12.34 164.79 N0770 LDSPRING 14.52 15.58 0.00 0.0088 3084.06 12.44 97.00 12.40 96.05 N0775 LOSPRING 12.92 17.08 0.00 0.0094 170.38 12.50 84.89 12.50 84.73 N0780 LOSPRING 12.81 17.48 0.00 0.0109 234.00 12.50 85.11 12.50 84.89 N0790 LDSPRING 12.87 17.64 0.00 0.0176 177.00 22.72 45.95 22.35 46.22 N0800 LOSPRING 15.14 19.83 0.00 0.0011 344398.18 15.04 768.90 22.37 69.35 N0810 LOSPRING 15.14 19.85 0.00 0.0021 10324.63 12.45 110.33 15.19 756.29 N0820 LOSPRING 15.17 19.80 0.00 0.0021 7741.35 15.47 482.95 12.45 73.12 N0830 LOSPRING 15.19 19.85 0.00 0.0031 7322.60 12.45 75.77 15.47 482.95 I #: 2008057345 BK: 16167 PG: . I, 02/29/2008 at 02:24 PM, R.: U)ING 5 PAGES $44.00 D DOC STAMP COLLECTION 48325.80 KEN BURKE, CLERK OF COURT PINELLAS COUNTY, FL BY DEPUTY CLERK: CLIKDMC3 g�' uTpR>� =~ BY 1888 N BETTY LN T�•'HISINSTR FLD2009 -03012 AND RETURN TO: J Jeffny Drew Bali Esgd ;- Square, Sanders do Dempsryl -L-1= Zoning: MAR atlas# 2606 201 North Fnourkliu� Suite 2100 Tampa, Florida 13611? C)WN& tiScation Number 03/29 /15 /00000 /420/0140 2509116 Cxr Tax Identification Number. 59- VIAR 0 2 2009 lamherein, the terms "Comm >" and/or "Grantee" shall include the heirs, PLANWO (WAMMiP�I'ti' es, ==sws and/or assigns of the reMmxf= pa des herew; ft ;ncllxie the phual, and the phual the singular; the use Cff Y OF CLEARWA smpiw mmnber sball Of amvnender shalt include all genders. SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED i ..s ;L This Special Warranty Deed is made and entered into as of the 2e day of February, ../1009, by and between CLEARWATER HOUSING AUTHORITY, a public body corporate and politic of the State of Florida, a/k/a CLEARWATER HOUSING AUTHORITY O CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, whose address is 909 Cleveland Street, Clearwater, Florida 33755 -4511 (hereinafter called the "Grantor') to HABITAT FOR OF pINELLAS COUNTY, INC., a Florida not - for -profit corporation, with an address of 3071 118x' Avenue North, St. Petersburg, FL 33716 (hereinafter called the "Grantee"). WITNESSETH: That Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, sold, alienated, remised, released, conveyed and confirmed, and by these presents does hereby grant, bargain, sell, alien, remise, release, convey and confirm unto the Grantee, its successors and assigns, forever, the following parcel of land situated in Pinellas County, Florida (the "Property"), to wit: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. TOGETHER with all the hereditaments, easements, rights -of -way, 'appurtenances, passages, water rights, drainage rights, and any and all other rights, liberties and privileges thereon including, if any, all right, title and interest of the Grarntor as it relates to the Property only and not to the extent that it relates to the other land owned by Grantor is and to all rights -of- way, easements, public and private streets, roads, avenues, alley, passageways, and water rights (including any of the foregoing lying in any road beds), in front of or abutting the Property or any portion thereof- TAWA/7SIW 014027.110011 ?INELLAS COUNTY FL OFF. REC. B1 16167 PG 2645 4 a the Crrantee subject to the This conveyance- is madey the Grantor and accepted by J matters provided herein and `thb�e matters set forth in Exhibit `B" attached hereto and incorporated herein by ref a "Permitted Exceptione). k �} ± sub to the Permitted TO HAVE AND T40-901.D the some in fee simple forever, J Exceptions. And the,.G�rai�or does covenant with the Grantee that at the time of the delivery w �m this Deed, Grantor is ra�►"y seized of the Property in fee simple, that the Property is t `� "�m�, covenants, restrictions and other matters except the all encumbrances, N li . to sell and convey Permitted Excepsic�, ghat Grantor has fall legal right, power and authority y the same and �q- Grantee shall have the peaceable and quiet possession of the Property, subject only td *e: imitted Exceptions. itor does hereby fully wwant the title to the Property, except for the , and will defend the title to the Property against the lawful claims of all claiming by, through or under the Grantor, but not otherwise. 'the Grantor does hereby reserves that if the Property or any part thereof that has not �i� b solclrm accordance with the Redevelopment Plan (as hereinafter defined), shall revert to the OrahfiDr'free and clear of any interest of Grantee on the fifth (50) year anniversary following Fe*uary 28, 2008 (the "Closing) if the Grantee fails to fully comply with the terms of the 14development Plan. Upon the sale of each Unit in accordance with the Redevelopment Plan, #n reversion of interest shall cease with respect to the sold portion of the Property. The "Redevelopment Plan' will include the constriction and sale of at least 50 "for sale" units which are to be made available to individuals who meet the criteria established in the Redevelopment Plan for home ownership (each a "Unit" and collectively, the "50 Affordable Units"). During the first thirty (30) days that the 50 Affordable Units are made available for sale, current clients of Grantor shall have the first opportunity to purchase such Units. Thereafter, clients of Grantor and persons or families with family incomes equal to or less than 800/9 of the Area Median income (as hereinafter defined) will have the opportunity to purchase such Units on a first- come -first -serve basis. Area Median Income shall mean the median gross income of a person, or a family, as applicable, in the area in which the Property is located as calculated and adjusted for household size from time to time by the Department of Housing and Urban Development or any successor. The Grantee, by its acceptance hereof, does hereby assume and agree to pay all real property taxes and assessments pertaining to the Property for the calendar year 2008 and subsequent years. - signatures to Follow - TA1v> AnSM.3 014627.00011 ?INELLAS COUNTY FL OFF. REC. B! 16167 PG 2646 ,L t i IN WITNESS WHET Grantor has executed this deed as of the day and year first r � e 1 IE above written. SIGNED, SEALED ANTS LIVERED C,EARWATER HOUSING AUTHORITY, a OUR PRESENCE: ,. public body corporate- Florida and politic of the State of (Jame: n ,� %r [ SEAL ST b. FFI.O A C /p" OF Art- _ 'The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this X day of February, Jacqueline Rivera, as Executive Director of Clearwater Housing Authority, a public X00$, by Jas;clu tiod cor orate and politic of the State of Florida, on behalf of the housing authority. She is nallv_ o or who produced as identification, and who did not an oath. ;0YLME comna�000eete�s 'e �Y�st12�011 _ TAWAnSI913 014027.00011 Name: Notary Public My Commission Expires: )INELLAS COUNTY FL OFF. REC. B: 16167 PG 2647 1, "A" TO DEED THAT PORTI WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE P Y DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: FORA OF REFERENCE, COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID ,ON 3, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, THENCE RUN N0 DEG. 08'18" WEST ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 3, ANCE OF 858.00 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 89 DEG. 3607 WEST, A j CE OF 1372.75 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE DEG. 0727" LANE (60' RIGHT OF WAY), TANCE O 105722 FEET TO THE 1T ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY, tOYNT OF BEGINNING, THENCE RUN NORTH 89 DEG. 12'39" WEST, A TANCE 504.62 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00 DEG. 11'44" EAST, A ISTANCE OF 220.00 FEET, THENCE RUN NORTH 89 DEG. 1739" WEST, A ' � DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF PINELAND DRIVE (60' R/W), THENCE RUN NORTH 00 DEG. 11'44" WEST C ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY, A DISTANCE OF 776.10 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY WITH THE CENTER LINE OF �r SPRINGTIME BRANCH, THENCE RUN IN A SOUTHEASTERLY AND NORTHEASTERLY DIRECTION ALONG THE CENTER LINE OF SAID SPRINGTIME BRANCH TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION OF SPRINGTIME BRANCH AND THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SUNSET POINT ROAD (83' R/W), THENCE RUN SOUTH 89 DEG. 1219" EAST ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY, A DISTANCE OF 147.49 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF BETTY LANE (60' R/ W), THENCE RUN SOUTH 00 DEG. OT27" EAST A DISTANCE OF 698.09 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. TAWAl7S192.3 014027.00011 ?INELLA,S COUNTY FL OFF. REC. El 16167 PG 2648 L- If; =F -XM—n `B" TO DEED i; 1. Taxes anderrts for the 2008 and subsequent years. �r 2 Easenie4., A reements as recorded in OR Book 5282 Page 1450; OR Book 5282 Pa&d,bWj OR Book 5324 Page 523, OR Book 5404 Page 362; OR Book 5404 page4€; OR Book 5408 Page 315 and OR Book 6531 Page 2350, all of the PnbI'ic- .11;ecords of Pinellas County, Florida. 3. Z r 5. =an n AgreeDnent by and between City of Clearwater, Florida and Harold F. y Alice M. Bird, n/k/a Alice H. Rhoades, dated 5/7/1981, recorded 612/1981 in OR Book 5199 Page 1459, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Any Riparian Rights. Declaration of Affordable Dwelling Units Covenants (Master Restrictions) exected by Clearwater housing Authority dated as of February 28, 2008 and recorded of even dated herewith. NOTE: Right of Way Dedication for Betty lane recorded 4/20/81 in OR Book 5178 Page 32, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. TAWAR51923 L61 I W O3/2009 .._ � Receipt #: 1200900000000001388 10:31:35AM .� Date: 03 /03/2009 Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No Amount Paid PLT2009 -00001 Preliminary Plat 001000000341240000 600.00 FLD2009 -03012 04 Flexible Residential (SFR) 001000000341262000 300.00 FLD2009 -03012 Fire - Prelim Site Plan 001000000342501000 200.00 Line Item Total: $1,100.00 Payments: Method Payer Bank No Account No Confirm No How Received Amount Paid Check PINELLAS HABITAT FOR R_D 12730 In Person 1,100.00 HUMANITY INC Payment Total: $1,100.00 THIS IS NOT A PERMIT. This is a receipt for an application for a permit. This application will be reviewed and you will be notified as to the outcome of the application. cRcccipi.ipl Page 1 of I 1 41 CITY OF C L EARWAT E R ^' J* POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758 -4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 5624567 FAx (727) 5624865 PLANNING DEPARTMENT May 20, 2009 Ronald Spoor, Land Development Manager Habitat for Humanity of Pinellas County 3071 118'h Avenue North St. Petersburg, FL 33716 RE: Development Order — Case Nos. FLD2009- 03012/PLT2009 -00001 1888 N. Betty Lane Dear Mr. Spoor: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4- 206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On May 19, 2009, the Community Development Board reviewed your request for (1) Flexible Development approval to permit a 51 -lot subdivision for detached dwellings in the Medium Density Residential (MDR) District with a minimum lot area of 4,019 square feet, a minimum lot width of 40.9 feet (measured at the front setback line) and a reduction to the front setback requirement from 25 to 19 feet (to building), as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 304.G; and (2) Preliminary Plat approval for a 51 -lot subdivision for detached dwellings. The Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Conditions of Approval: Findings of Fact: 1. The 8.89 acres is located on the south side of Sunset Point Road between N. Betty Lane and Pineland Drive; 2. The property was previously developed with a 61 -unit attached dwelling complex (Homer Villas), which was demolished in July 2008; 3. The surrounding area is primarily developed with detached dwellings, although an attached dwelling complex is located to the south and a public school is located to the east of the subject property; 4. The applicant, Habitat for Humanity of Pinellas County, proposes to redevelop the subject property with a 51 -lot subdivision for detached dwellings providing affordable housing for families; 5. The applicant is proposing to utilize the existing infrastructure, including the streets, water mains and sanitary sewer lines, where such location of this infrastructure requires flexibility with minimum lot area, minimum lot width and minimum front setback standards; 6. The proposed Stevens Creek Drive will be a private street 28 feet in width and will be maintained by a homeowners association; 7. A tot lot (Tract B) is proposed as an amenity to this subdivision, located between Lots 41 and 42, and will be maintained by a homeowners association; 8. The proposal includes a minimum lot area of 4,019 square feet and a minimum lot width (measured at the front setback line) of 40.9 feet; ••F.,.,... F..o,.,vuarc ..�� Acc,ou.rn�x A.�,,,�.� F..,,,.,.,�.,° p M May 20, 2009 Spoor — Page 2 9. The proposal includes a reduction to the front setback from 25 to 19 feet, but additional front setback will be provided to the garage door to preclude a vehicle parked in the driveway from overhanging the public sidewalk; 10. The Preliminary Plat for this subdivision complies with the design standards of the Community Development Code. A Final Plat will be required to be approved and accepted by City Council prior to recording in the public records; and 11. There is no outstanding Code Enforcement issue associated with the subject property. Conclusions of Law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Tables 2 -301.1 and 2 -304 of the Community Development Code; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2 -304.G of the Community Development Code; 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Section 3 -913 of the Community Development Code; and 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the requirements for Preliminary Plats in Sections 4 -704, 4 -705 and 4 -709 of the Community Development Code. Conditions of Approval: 1. That the following minimum setbacks apply to this subdivision: a. front: 19 feet to porches and additional setback be provided to the garage doors to preclude vehicles parked in driveways from overhanging the public sidewalks; b. side: five feet; c. rear: 10 feet; 2, That the maximum building height be 30 feet; 3. That black barrels stored exterior to the dwelling and outdoor mechanical equipment be screened from view from adjacent streets and properties; 4. That, based on the provisions of Section 3 -804.E and the prevailing lot pattern of the surrounding area, the maximum height of the fence proposed along the rear of Lots 10 -17 be three feet. Additionally, gates must be installed in the fence for Lots 10, 11, 16 and 17 to allow for the mowing of grass within the rights -of -way by the abutting lot owners; 5. That sidewalks be provided on both sides of Stevens Creek Drive; and 6. That, prior to the issuance of a building permit to construct the subdivision improvements, plans be revised to comply with all requirements of General Engineering, Environmental Engineering, Stormwater Engineering, Traffic Engineering and the Land Resource Specialist. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (May. 19, 2010). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the initial building permit. The building_ permit must be obtained within six months of the initial permit application. This timeframe to obtain the initial building permit may be extended for an additional six months for cause by the Community Development Coordinator. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for the Flexible Development approval for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. ii. "M May 20, 2009 Spoor — Page 3 The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4 -502.B by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on June 2, 2009 (14 days from the date of the CDB meeting). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Planner III, at 727 -562 -4504. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.mycleaT-water.com/,goN,`/depts/`"plannin . Sincerely, r i el e Planning Director S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)Vnactive or Finished Applications lBettyN1888 Stevens Creek Subdivision (MDR) 2009.05 - Approved - WWIBetty N 1888 Development Order 5.20.09.doc Wells, Wayne From: Ron Spoor [land @phfh.org] Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 4:55 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Linda Cramer Subject: RE: FLD20O9- 03O12/PLT2009- 00001 - 1888 N. Betty Lane Wayne: I. have represented to the community included the 6' fence and as such I to Condition of Approval #4. Thank there was a way to permit the.fence Tuesday. - Ron on Pineland Drive. that our proposal would like to maintain an objection you for investigating to see if without. a variance. See you Ronald E. Spoor Land Development Manager Habitat for Humanity of Pinellas County 3071 118th Avenue North St. Petersburg, Florida 33716 727/536 -4755 ext 218 (office) 727/776 -2960 (cell) 727/209 -2191 (fax) - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com [ mailto :wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com] Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 4:37 PM To: Ron Spoor Cc: shah @cumbeyfair.com; michael.delk @MyClearwater.com; Gina.Clayton @myClearwater.com; Robert.Tefft @MyClearwater.com Subject: FLD2009- 03012/PLT2009 -00001 - 1888 N. Betty Lane Ron - Sometimes the finger acts too fast to "send" emails. I meant to point out in the Planning DRC comments. that this fence height issue was raised. The response to comments did not address the Code provision cited. Additionally, since it appears by your objecting to this Condition of Approval on the Consent portion of the agenda. Wayne email train below that you are #4, this application will. not be - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 4:21 PM To: 'Ron Spoor' Cc: Linda Cramer; Delk, Michael;. Clayton, Gina; Tefft, Robert Subject: FLD2009- 03012/PLT2009 -00001 - 1888 N. Betty Lane Ron - Unfortunately, we cannot classify these lots any other way but as double frontage lots. I have checked with Planning management and the non - ingress /egress easement would not change the classification of these lots nor the fence provisions regarding double frontage lots. The Condition of Approval as proposed will stand as written to the Community il i Development. Board. Wayne - - - -- Original. Message---- - From: Ron Spoor [mailto:land @phfh.org] Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 11:50 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Linda Cramer Subject: RE: FLD2009- 03012/PLT2009 -00001 - 1888 N..Betty Lane Mr.. Wells: Thank you for sending the attached Staff. Report. We have no. objections to the Conditions of Approval on the attached Staff Report with the exception of the first sentence of Conditions of Approval. #4. . In particular, we are objecting to the requirement that the fence proposed along the rear of lots 10 -17 be limited to a height of 3'. We do understand that this requirement is related to the classification of these lots as double frontage lots and the provisions of Section 3- 804.E. We are proposing that the lots not be classified as. double frontage lots. . To. ensure that the. lots are not classified or used as double frontage lots, we propose to place a 1' or 21 non - ingress, non - egress easement along the rear boundary of these lots. We apologize that this proposed non - ingress, non - egress easement was not illustrated on the plans that we have submitted. We have conducted two "neighborhood meetings ". with residents of the Pineland Drive area to discuss the proposed Stevens Creek plans. These meetings have allowed us to understand the concerns of the neighborhood as they related to the previous Homer Villas housing project and as they now relate to the proposed Stevens Creek subdivision. Feedback at the meetings has focused on concerns about pedestrian cut - through traffic that occurs on private property between Betty Lane and Pineland Drive. It is my opinion that the neighbors on Pineland Drive do feel strongly that they would like to see a 6' fence installed along the back of lots 10 - 17. As we do want. to be. responsive and considerate of the neighbors along Pineland Drive we would like to install this. fence. We sincerely appreciate your consideration. -.Ron Spoor Ronald E. Spoor Land Development Manager Habitat for Humanity of Pinellas. County 3071 118th Avenue North St. Petersburg, Florida 33716 727/536 -4755 ext 218 (office) 727/776 -2960 (cell) 727/209 -2191 (fax) - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wayne. Wells @myClearwater.com [ mailto :Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com] Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 4:11 PM To: Ron Spoor Cc: Sherry.Watkins @myClearwater.com Subject: FLD2009- 03012/PLT2009 -00001 -.1888 N. Betty Lane Ronald - Attached is the Staff Report for the above referenced cases, to be heard 2 . c-V by the Community Developmem,, ,oard (CDB) at 1:00 pm on Tuesd-_, May 19, 2009, in City Council Chambers (City Hall, 112 S. Osceola Avenue). Please review the attached Staff Report and let me know by 10:00 am on Monday, May 18, 2009, if the Conditions of Approval are acceptable or not. If acceptable, assuming no letters or emails of opposition are submitted (none yet), then such applications will be placed on the Consent portion of the CDB agenda. Wayne M. Wells, AICP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 -5520 Phone: 727 - 562 -4504 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 <<Betty N 1888 Staff Report.doc>> 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 4:37 PM To: 'land @phfh.org' Cc: P. E. P. J. Shaw (E- mail); Delk, Michael; Clayton, Gina; Tefft, Robert Subject: FLD20O9- O3O12/PLT2OO9 -00001 - 1888 N. Betty Lane Ron - Sometimes the finger acts too fast to "send" emails. I meant to point out in the Planning DRC comments that this fence height issue was raised. The response to comments did not address the Code provision cited. Additionally, since it appears by your email train below that you are objecting to this Condition of Approval #4, this application will not be on the Consent portion of the agenda. Wayne - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 4:21 PM To: 'Ron Spoor' Cc: Linda Cramer; Delk, Michael; Clayton, Gina; Tefft, Robert Subject: FLD2009- 03012/PLT2009 -00001 - 1888 N. Betty Lane Ron Unfortunately, we cannot classify these lots any other way but as double frontage lots. I have checked with Planning management and the non - ingress /egress easement would not change the classification of these lots nor the fence provisions regarding double frontage lots. The Condition of Approval as proposed will stand as written to the Community Development Board. Wayne - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Ron Spoor [mailto:land@phfh.org] Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 11:50 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Linda Cramer Subject: RE: FLD2009- 03012/PLT2009 -00001 - 1888 N. Betty Lane Mr. Wells: Thank you for sending the attached Staff Report. We have no objections to the Conditions of Approval on the attached Staff Report with the exception of the first sentence of Conditions of Approval #4. In particular, we are objecting to the requirement that the fence proposed along the rear of lots 10 -17 be limited to a height of 3'. We do understand that this requirement is related to the classification of these lots as double frontage lots and the provisions of Section 3- 804.E. We are proposing that the lots not be classified as double frontage lots. To ensure that the lots are not classified or used as double frontage lots, we propose to place a 1' or 2' non - ingress, non - egress easement along the rear boundary of these lots. We apologize that this proposed non - ingress, non - egress easement was not illustrated on the plans that we have submitted. 1 We have conducted two "neighborhood meetings" with residents of the Pineland Drive area to discuss the proposed Stevens Creek plans. These meetings have allowed us to understand the concerns of the neighborhood as they related to the previous Homer Villas housing project and as they now relate to the proposed Stevens Creek subdivision. Feedback at the meetings has focused on concerns about pedestrian cut - through traffic that occurs on private property between Betty Lane and Pineland Drive. It is my opinion that the neighbors on Pineland Drive do feel strongly that they would like to see a 6' fence installed along the back of lots 10 - 17. As we do want to be responsive and considerate of the neighbors along Pineland Drive we would like to install this fence. We sincerely appreciate your consideration. - Ron Spoor Ronald E. Spoor Land Development Manager Habitat for Humanity of Pinellas County 3071 118th Avenue North St. Petersburg, Florida 33716 727/536 -4755 ext 218 (office) 727/776 -2960 (cell) 727/209 -2191 (fax) - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com [ mailto :Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com] Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 4:11 PM To: Ron Spoor Cc: Sherry.Watkins @myClearwater.com Subject: FLD2009- 03012/PLT2009 -00001 - 1888 N. Betty Lane Ronald - Attached is the Staff Report for the above referenced cases, to be heard by the Community Development Board (CDB) at 1:00 pm on Tuesday, May 19, 2009, in City Council Chambers (City Hall, 112 S. Osceola Avenue). Please review the attached Staff Report and let me know by 10:00 am on Monday, May 18, 2009, if the Conditions of Approval are acceptable or not. If acceptable, assuming no letters or emails of opposition are submitted (none yet), then such applications will be placed on the Consent portion of the CDB agenda. Wayne M. Wells, AICP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 -5520 Phone: 727 - 562 -4504 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 <<Betty N 1888 Staff Report.doc>> Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 4:21 PM To: 'Ron Spoor' Cc: Linda Cramer; Delk, Michael; Clayton, Gina; Tefft, Robert Subject: FLD2009- 03012/PLT2009 -00001 - 1888 N. Betty Lane Ron - Unfortunately, we cannot classify these lots any other way but as double frontage lots. I have checked with Planning management and the non - ingress /egress easement would not change the classification of these lots nor the fence provisions regarding double frontage lots. The Condition of Approval as proposed will stand as written to the Community Development Board. Wayne - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Ron Spoor [mailto:land @phfh.org] Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 11:50 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Linda Cramer Subject: RE: FLD2009- 03012/PLT2009 -00001 - 1888 N. Betty Lane Mr. Wells: Thank you for sending the attached Staff Report. We have no objections to the Conditions of Approval on the attached Staff Report with the exception of the first sentence of Conditions of Approval #4. In particular, we are objecting to the requirement that the fence proposed along the rear of lots 10 -17 be limited to a height of 3'. We do understand that this requirement is related to the classification of these lots as double frontage lots and the provisions of Section 3- 804.E. We are proposing that the lots not be classified as double frontage lots. To ensure that the lots are not classified or used as double frontage lots, we propose to place a 11 or 2' non - ingress, non - egress easement along the rear boundary of these lots. We apologize that this proposed non - ingress, non - egress easement was not illustrated on the plans that we have submitted. We have conducted two "neighborhood meetings" with residents of the Pineland Drive area to discuss the proposed Stevens Creek plans. These meetings have allowed us to understand the concerns of the neighborhood as they related to the previous Homer villas housing project and as they now relate to the proposed Stevens Creek subdivision. Feedback at the meetings has focused on concerns about pedestrian cut - through traffic that occurs on private property between Betty Lane and Pineland Drive. It is my opinion that the neighbors on Pineland Drive do feel strongly that they would like to see a 6' fence installed along the back of lots 10 - 17. As we do want to be responsive and considerate of the neighbors along Pineland Drive we would like to install this fence. We sincerely appreciate your consideration. - Ron Spoor Ronald E. Spoor Land Development Manager Habitat for Humanity of Pinellas County 3071 118th Avenue North St. Petersburg, Florida 33716 727/536 -4755 ext 218 (office, 727/776 -2960 (cell) 727/209 -2191 (fax) - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wayne. Wells @myClearwater.com [ mailto :Wayne.Wells @myClearwater.com] Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 4:11 PM To: Ron Spoor Cc: Sherry.Watkins @myClearwater.com Subject: FLD2009- 03012/PLT2009 -00001 - 1888 N. Betty Lane Ronald - Attached is the Staff Report for the above referenced cases, to be heard by the Community Development Board (CDB) at 1:00 pm on Tuesday, May 19, 2009, in City Council Chambers (City Hall, 112 S. Osceola Avenue). Please review the attached Staff Report and let me know by 10:00 am on Monday, May 18, 2009, if the Conditions of Approval are acceptable or not. If acceptable, assuming no letters or emails of opposition are submitted (none yet), then such applications will be placed on the Consent portion of the CDB agenda. Wayne M. Wells, AICP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 -5520 Phone: 727 - 562 -4504 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 <<Betty N 1888 Staff Report.doc>> 2 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 4:11 PM To: 'land @phfh.org' Cc: Watkins, Sherry Subject: FLD2009- 03012/PLT2009 -00001 - 1888 N. Betty Lane Ronald - Attached is the Staff Report for the above referenced cases, to be heard by the Community Development Board (CDB) at 1:00 pm on Tuesday, May 19, 2009, in City Council Chambers (City Hall, 112 S. Osceola Avenue). Please review the attached Staff Report and let me know. by 10:00 am on Monday, May 18, 2009, if the Conditions of Approval are acceptable or not. If acceptable, assuming no letters or emails of opposition are submitted (none yet), then such applications will be placed on the Consent portion of the CDB agenda. Wayne M. Wells, AICP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 -5520 Phone: 727 - 562 -4504 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 Betty N 1888 Staff Report.doc \ Ji� Wells, Wayne From: PJ Shah [shah @cumbeyfair.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 9:50 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FWD: Stevens Creek Subdivision C &F Job No. 018C Wayne, I hope this reaches you. P.J P.J. Shah,PE Cumbey & Fair, Inc. 2463 Enterprise Road Clearwater, FL 33763 -1790 PH:727.797.8982 FX:727.791.8752 Email:shah@cumbeyfair.com Forwarded Message FROM: Linda Cramer <Icramer(a)cumbeyfair.com> TO: Wayne Wells <wayne.wells myclearwater.com> DATE: Mon, 4 May 2009 16:49:02 -0400 RE: Stevens Creek Subdivision C &F Job No. 018C Mr. Wells, Attached is the correct sketch. Please contact P.J. Shah, P.E. with questions. Linda Cramer Marketing Coordinator Cumbey & Fair, Inc. 2463 Enterprise Road Clearwater, FL 33763 -1790 Phone: (727) 797 -8982 ext 11 Fax: (727) 791 -8752 Website: www.cumbeyfair.com 5/6/2009 Page 1 of 1 W GNU ►- """ 25' WETLAND 8,727 S.F. EB BUFFER U` 4 50' DRAINAGE & UTILI EASEMENT (O.R. 6531, PG .3 0) / �o ,\ cA 7,693 S.F. w 1 j \rn 7,447 S.F. 5 82, 126' \ 7,739 S.F. i ,,�� 68��- --n�9' 7 9 8 7,376 S.F. O. 8,827 S.F. 6,826 S.F. w c 10 15,386 S.F. eA9 i i�36 3 ��a�,��� •0 , A�6i / 35 TRACT A,,, -� 8,183 S.F0 32,648 -5.F. i S.F. / 'S 3g.2 �� a DK- o, ' 43.8` � r � \ p o 41.0 36 '' 9,681 S.F. 37 , \ �\ 7,149 S.F. d N II �- r ► �� 39 \ 1 38 r r a 40 p 6,434 S.F. \6,458 S.F. r r 6 670 S.F. °' 85 II r 'f I 8,91 S.F. \ r \ M II `- I i r I �� --'''� P OPOSED DRAINA E EASEMENT - - -- M - - - -- 80.4T 58.8' 53.9' 43.6' 43.6' 52.0' .2 II N �i i I 113.6' 46.0' 46.0 46.0' 46.0' 44.1 ' -- - - - - -- - - - - - -- --------- -- - - - - -- (TOT LOT) _ -- i i o I 4,816 S.F. G( lS�p t� �> II i i (0I CITY OF C LEARWAT ER POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 .4t,.' • ` �,.< MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AvENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 5624567 FAx (727) 5624865 PLANNING DEPARTMENT April 28, 2009 Ronald Spoor, Land Development Manager Habitat for Humanity of Pinellas County 3071 118'h Avenue North St. Petersburg, FL 33716 Re: Community Development Board Meeting (Case Nos. FLD2009- 03012/PLT2009- 00001) Dear Mr. Spoor: You have filed Case Nos. FLD2009- 03012/PLT2009 -00001 for property located generally at 1888 N. Betty Lane for (1) Flexible Development approval to permit a 51 -lot subdivision for detached dwellings in the Medium Density Residential (MDR) District with a minimum lot area of 4,019 square feet, a minimum lot width of 40.9 feet (measured at the front setback line) and a reduction to the front setback requirement from 25 to 19 feet (to building), as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 304.G; and (2) Preliminary Plat approval for a 51 -lot subdivision for detached dwellings. This case has been scheduled for review by the Community Development Board on May 19, 2009. The meeting will take place at 1:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 3rd floor of City Hall at 112 S. Osceola Avenue, Clearwater. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727 -562 -4504. Sincerely, A�- M 1 WaynelM. Wells, AICP Planner III S: IPlnnning DeparhnentlCD BIFLEX (FLD)IPending cnsesl Up for the next CDBIBetty N1888 Stevens Creek Subdivision (MDR) 2009.05 - 5.19.09 CDB - WMBetty N 1888 CDB Letter 4.28.09.doc CyO Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, April 24, 2009 12:10 PM To: 'land @phfh.org' Cc: 'shah @cumbeyfair.com'; Watkins, Sherry Subject: FLD2009 -03012 and PLT2009- 00001, 1888 N. Betty Lane Ronald - I have been reviewing the. resubmittal package for the above referenced applications and find the following missing from the package or revisions to the plans or documents are necessary: J1. Submit the Preliminary Plat application. 2. The color rendered site plan (color map) submitted is incorrect, as the layout does not match that of the redesign per DRC comments. Revise. d 3. There was discussion regarding comments from both departments at DRC for the provision of sidewalks along both sides of the street, where we said we would work with you regarding the location of the sidewalk. The revised plans submitted omit sidewalks from the frontages of Lots 1 -2, 6 -8, 13 -15 and 20 -27 with a note that such sidewalks "will be bonded." This is different than our discussion. Sidewalks will need to be constructed along the lot frontage of each lot as part of the building permit process. Plans need to be revised to show such sidewalks will be constructed along the lots mentioned above. Unclear of the lot width at the front setback line for Lots 9, 12,16, 19 an 39 Revise Sheet 3. Lots 1, 27, 28, 34, 41 and 42 are corner lots, where structures are required to meet front setbacks along the street frontages and side setbacks otherwise. Unclear of what setback is proposed for these corner lots and if you are requesting any reductions. Clarify. 6. Need to revise for f, g and h. Additionally, revise Required /Allowed for Side Setback to 0 -5', (not 0 -10'). Sheet 3 Site Data - Jf. Under "Setbacks" for "Front ", need to address under the Proposed column what is proposed for corner lots. Also; change the Required /Allowed to "10 -25" ; fig. Under "Setbacks" for "Rear ", change the Required /Allowed to "0 -10 "; Jh. Under "Height ", change the Required /Allowed to "30-50"'; 7esponse to Residential Infill Project criteria #7 -The existing land use designation for the property of Residential Urban permits a maximum density of 7.5 dwelling units per acre, not the 15 du /acre indicated. Revise. 8. Revise the Preliminary Plat Sheet 2 for the following: Lot areas for Lots 2 -10 are greater than indicated, since Tract B was eliminated and the lot lines have been extended to the north overall parcel line. Recalculate lot areas and revise. These applications are being placed on the May 19, 2009, CDB agenda but the above needs to be submitted by Friday, May 1, 2009 (one original and 14 copies). Please see Sherry Watkins so you can collate the above revisions into the application packages. Wayne M. Wells, A/CP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 -5520 Phone: 727 - 562 -4504 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 a CUMBEY & FAIR, INC. 2463 ENTERPRISE ROAD CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33763 -1790 (727) 797 -8982 Clearwater (813) 223 -4333 Tampa (727) 791 -8752 Fax www.cumbeyfair.com CITY OF CLEARWATER COMMENTS & RESPONSES ENGINEERING COMMENTS Comment Date: April 2, 2009 Response Date: April 3, 2009 Project Name: Stevens Creek Subdivision Application Number: C &F Job Number: 018C Prior to review by the Community Development Board: 1. Sidewalks are required along both sides of all public and private streets. (Community Development Code Sections 3 -1701 and 3 -1907 and Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards, Article 30). In addition, subdivision design shall allow a minimum of 19 -feet between back of sidewalk to garage doors to discourage parked vehicles from blocking sidewalks. Response: Sidewalks are proposed on both sides. Lots where minimum 19 feet distance cannot be maintained will be bonded - See Sheet #3. 2. The plan submitted indicates that the water main on Pineland is proposed to be capped. This will leave a dead -end line in place of a looped system. This will present a water quality problem for the City of Clearwater and existing service customers on Pineland. Can this line be reconnected along a parcel line not passing under a retention pond so as to maintain the loop and allow for the proposed construction? Response: Water main loop is now maintained - See Sheet #10. 3. Agree to provide an additional 10 -foot drainage easement along the existing 7.5 -foot easement lying along the north property line of proposed Lot 48 to provide for maintenance of proposed 24 -inch storm pipe. Response: Additional easement proposed - See Sheet #2 and #3. Prior to the issuance of a building permit: 1. Show on the water and sewer plan the location of chlorination and sample points for the new water main - Response: Sampling points shown. Page 17 J:yn -C\01 BC\Words \CityClw Comment Responses 040309.doc CIVIL ENGINEERS LAND SURVEYORS PLANNERS <Q O CLI � 9� 1. Sidewalks are required along both sides of all public and private streets. (Community Development Code Sections 3 -1701 and 3 -1907 and Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards, Article 30). In addition, subdivision design shall allow a minimum of 19 -feet between back of sidewalk to garage doors to discourage parked vehicles from blocking sidewalks. Response: Sidewalks are proposed on both sides. Lots where minimum 19 feet distance cannot be maintained will be bonded - See Sheet #3. 2. The plan submitted indicates that the water main on Pineland is proposed to be capped. This will leave a dead -end line in place of a looped system. This will present a water quality problem for the City of Clearwater and existing service customers on Pineland. Can this line be reconnected along a parcel line not passing under a retention pond so as to maintain the loop and allow for the proposed construction? Response: Water main loop is now maintained - See Sheet #10. 3. Agree to provide an additional 10 -foot drainage easement along the existing 7.5 -foot easement lying along the north property line of proposed Lot 48 to provide for maintenance of proposed 24 -inch storm pipe. Response: Additional easement proposed - See Sheet #2 and #3. Prior to the issuance of a building permit: 1. Show on the water and sewer plan the location of chlorination and sample points for the new water main - Response: Sampling points shown. Page 17 J:yn -C\01 BC\Words \CityClw Comment Responses 040309.doc CIVIL ENGINEERS LAND SURVEYORS PLANNERS SWFWMD Comments & Responses March 25, 2009 Application No. 44034468.001 Page 2 Re: Stevens Creek Subdivision C &F Job No. 018C 2. Sample tap needs to be in a location to confirm absence of bacteriological contamination and allow for clearance of new main for service. Response: Sampling taps proposed. This will be reviewed prior to approval by County Health Department / FDEP. 3. Connection to the existing Sanitary manhole shall be coordinated with the City of Clearwater Public Utilities Department. Response: Noted 4. Sanitary Sewer will be privately owned and maintained within a private road. For this reason sanitary manhole covers shall not have the words "City of Clearwater" on them. Response: Not Applicable. 5. Betty Lane is a County numbered road (C.R. 355). Applicant shall obtain a right -of -way permit from Pinellas County prior to the commencement of any work activities within this right -of -way. Response: Noted 6. Applicant shall obtain a permit for the water main construction from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection. Response: Noted 7. Applicant shall obtain a permit for the sewer main construction from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection. Response: Noted 8. The City of Clearwater Engineering Department Details on sheets 9, 11 and 12 are dated. Please update with current details available on our website: www myclearwater.com /gov /depts /pwa /engin /Production /stddet/index.asp Response: Revised per updated details. 9. Extend storm pipe under entire front yards of Lots 48 - 51 to create an area where °M04- -can be installed. RECEIVED Response: Revised APP 13 2009 ENVIRIONMENTAL COMMENTS PLAWNG 09Wr M T CITY OF CLEARI EP 1. Top of bank (TOB) at Pond 2 is shown in different locations on the current site survey and the proposed site plan. Verify the location of the TOB at Pond 2 and modify plans accordingly to accommodate the 15 foot vegetative buffer as required in Section 3 -907 of the Community Development Code. Response: Additional topo at wetland jurisdiction is now added. Pond #2 is to be generally left in its existing condition. Fire: 1. The width of the road is shown as 28'. As such street parking will only be allowed on one side which will be the side of the road with out fire hydrants. "NO PARKING FIRELANE" signs will have to be posted every 60' on the hydrant side of the road. Please show details and locations on page 3 PRIOR TO CDB. Response: Revised. J:ymC%018C\WordsQtyCtw Comment Responses NOVA= CIVIL ENGINEERS LAND SURVEYORS PLANNERS SWFWMD Comments & Responses Application No. 44034468.001 Re: Stevens Creek Subdivision March 25, 2009 Page 3 C &F Job No. 018C 2. PROVIDE clarity on sheet 10 to identity on Pineland Drive location of fire hydrant assembly for Units 48/49/50/51. Response: Revised. Page 17 J:yn- C1018C\Words\CRyChv Comment Responses 040309.doc (pinjINA IJ PLANNING CITY OF CLEARWN,- CIVIL ENGINEERS LAND SURVEYORS PLANNERS SWFWMD Comments & Responses March 25, 2009 Application No. 44034468.001 Page 4 Re: Stevens Creek Subdivision C &F Job No. 018C STORMWATER COMMENTS The following shall be addressed prior to Community Development Board: 1. Show that the proposed and existing ponds drain down in 24 hours or less. Current design shows the proposed ponds do not meet this requirement. Response: See revised Drainage Calculations. 2. Soil analysis does not provide the seasonal high water table elevation. Proposed ponds shall have a minimum of 6" clearance between the pond bottom and seasonal high water level. Response: Soil borings indicate no existing ground water in the top 6 feet. Ponds #1 and #2 existing as dry ponds. Pond #3 bottom proposed is approximately 2 feet higher than existing Pond #1. 3. Please submit a revised drainage report per City of Clearwater Drainage Criteria. Response: Revised Drainage Calculations are per City criteria. 4. Please clearly show the top of bank of the Springtime branch and the City of Clearwater drainage easement over this branch on the Paving and Grading Plan for proposed easements assessment. Response: Revised Drainage Calculations are per City criteria. 5. Since the existing Pond 2 is being utilized for a portion of the proposed development, plan shall indicate that Pond 2 will be regraded, cleaned and resodded. Response: Pond #2 received 2.5 acres of run -off from existing development and over 7.0 acres of run -off from City of Clearwater. Proposed drainage reduces drainage area from development to 0.94 acres. Planning to leave Pond #2 in its existing condition except minor regarding of slopes and top of bank on the south side. Page 19 J:yn- C\010C \Words \CityCIW Comment Responses 060308.doc Ml,ea'!NAL ReCFlVFD APR 13 2009 pLANNUINCr O r MX IT O17Y OF CLEA ATE& CIVIL ENGINEERS LAND SURVEYORS PLANNERS SWFWMD Comments & Responses Application No. 44034468.001 Re: Stevens Creek Subdivision OR, Im RECEIVED March 25, 2009 Page 5 APR 13 2009 C &F Job No. 018C PLM.IINS RP 9 NfJP1T The following shall be addressed prior to issuance of the Building A it CLEARM'AIM 1. Provide additional topography on the adjacent property directly south of the lots 24, 25, 26, 27. Please show the finished floor elevation of the existing structure(s) within this area. Response: Will be addressed prior to building permit. 2. What is the survey vertical datum? Survey and Paving /Grading plan shall utilize the NAVD88 datum. Please indicate this information on the survey and the Paving /Grading for review. Response: Now added on Sheet #6. 3. Verify if type A is applied to lots 48, 49, 50, and 51. Proposed swale along lots 48, 49, 50, and 51 shall be replaced with a storm sewer with inlets system. Future fencing may be constructed between the lots by different homeowners which would block the drainage way. Response: Lots 48 through 51 now revised to type "B' 4. The existing ditch in front of lots 48, 49, 50, and 51 appears to have been filled with dirt over time and currently does not have a positive flow path to properly drain runoff from these lots. In addition, the existing homes along the west side of the ditch have relatively low finished floor elevations. Show on the plan that roof gutters and downspouts will be directed toward the proposed rear swale. Response: Revised as per discussion at meeting with City Drainage Department on March 31, 2009. 5. Show a cross section of all the conflict points between the proposed /existing storm pipes and other utilities (i.e. existing storm pipe /inlet and proposed water pipe between lot 15 and 16, proposed storm pipe and existing sewer pipe in front of lot 14, existing sewer pipe and propose storm pipe between S -3 and S -4, etc.). Please revise the design as necessary to provide sufficient clearance (vertical and horizontal) per Florida Administrative codes. Response: Cross Sections are now added. See Sheet #8. 6. Please provide a 6" minimum clearance between the skimmer bottom (value C on the table of Sheet 7) and the pond bottom of control structure of Pond 3. Response: Revised 7. Private storm sewer system shall use manhole lids that read "Storm Sewer", not index 203 as submitted plan shows. The same applies to the two existing curb inlet covers. Response: Revised 8. Please submit a copy of the approved SWFWMD ERP permit. Response: SWFWMD ERP review in process. Copy of permit when obtained will be submitted. 9. Please provide a private easement over the existing and proposed 24" outlet pipe of the existing private pond located directly south of the project for future maintenance. The proposed 24" appears to be too close to the proposed building edge. Response: Easement proposed. See Sheet #2 and #3. General note: 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Response: Noted J:yn•0018C \Words \City0w Comment Responses 040309.doc CIVIL ENGINEERS LAND SURVEYORS PLANNERS SWFWMD Comments & Responses Application No. 44034468.001 Re: Stevens Creek Subdivision March 25, 2009 Page 6 C &F Job No. 018C 2. At building permit application, applicant shall submit drainage report, soil report, and any other drainage related document for review and record. Response: Noted Page 20 J:yn- C\018C\Words1CltyCtW Comment Responses 040309.doc ()R11G1NAL RECEIVED APR 13 2009 KAMM pr C- RY OF CLEARWATP CIVIL ENGINEERS LAND SURVEYORS PLANNERS SWFWMD Comments & Responses Application No. 44034468.001 Re: Stevens Creek Subdivision March 25, 2009 Page 7 C &F Job No. 018C TRAFFIC COMMENTS 1. Show 20' x 20' sight visibility triangles at the private street intersections with Betty Lane. There shall be no objects in the sight triangle which does not meet the City's acceptable vertical height criteria at a level between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade. (City's Community Development Code, Section 3 -904) Response: Now shown on Sheet #6 and #13 The above to be addressed prior to a Community Development Board (CDB) hearing. General Note(s): 1) Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). Response: Noted 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Response:- Noted Page 20 J:yn- C\018C \Words\CityCW Comment Responses 040309.doc ORIGIM PnEVED APR 13 2009 6y 6F CLEARWATE1 CIVIL ENGINEERS LAND SURVEYORS PLANNERS SWFWMD Comments & Responses March 25, 2009 Application No. 44034468.001 Page 3 Re: Stevens Creek Subdivision C &F Job No. 018C Environmental. 1. Fire: 1. See Sheet #3 for revisions. 2. Revised Land Resources: 1. Revised - See Sheet #6. 2. Canopies added on Sheet #10. 3. Added on Sheet #6, #10 and #13. 4. Noted 5. Noted, not applicable for this submittal. The following shall be addressed prior to Community Development Board: 1 -8. The following shall be addressed prior to issuance of the Building Permit: 1 -10. General Note: M0114AL 1 -2 RECEIVED c 'Ay CLEAR .�.s Page 20 J:1ro001=Words \CityCAV DRS Comment Responses 041009.doc CIVIL ENGINEERS LAND SURVEYORS PLANNERS r� CUMBEY & FAIR, INC. 2463 ENTERPRISE ROAD CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33763 -1790 (727) 797 -8982 Clearwater (813) 223 -4333 Tampa (727) 791 -8752 Fax www.cumbeyfair.com Comment Date: Response Date: Project Name: Application Number: C &F Job Number: PLANNING COMMENTS CITY OF CLEARWATER COMMENTS & RESPONSES DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMENTS April 2, 2009 April 3, 2009 Stevens Creek Subdivision 018C Item No. Comment 1 -11. Revised - See Sheets #2 and 3. 12. Buffer easements are per SWFWMD requirements. 13. Revised. 14. Items "a" through "i" are now revised. 15. All double frontage lots require two (2) front set - backs. As proposed on Sheet 3 - these lots will have minimum 19 feet on two (2) fronts. 16. Fence height and type is now shown. 'R' E-6VED An 13 2099 17. Building on lot #23 revised to allow stoop at rear door. !! } C_ Ay OF C LEARWATM 18. Yes. 19. Now revised /clarified on Sheet #6, 3 and 2. 20. Easement is now added on Sheet #2. 21. It is now Tract B. (Old Tract B was deleted). 22. Revised. 23. The top of bank JOB) on survey referred to TOB of development. TOB of creek is at the jurisdiction line. Page 21 & 22 J:yrC\01 BC \Words \dtyCtw DRS Comment Responses 041009.doc CIVIL ENGINEERS LAND SURVEYORS PLANNERS SW FW MD Comments & Responses March 25, 2009 Application No. 44034468.001 Page 2 Re: Stevens Creek Subdivision C &F Job No. 018C 24 25. Power and telephone lines are proposed to be underground. E' IIN.l Rrcov ® A? la 13 2000 Page 22 J: jn- M01BC\Words \CilyCtw DRS Comment Responses 041009.doc CIVIL ENGINEERS LAND SURVEYORS PLANNERS SW FW MD Comments & Responses March 25, 2009 Application No. 44034468.001 Page 3 Re: Stevens Creek Subdivision C &F Job No. 018C Solid Waste: 1. Not applicable as discussed at DRC. 2. Owner will work with solid waste department prior to building permit. Traffic Engineering: 1. Revised Sheet #6 and #13. General Note(s): 1 -2 Noted Planning: 1 -15 cfy of Page 24 J:yn- C\018C\Words \CltyC1w DRS Comment Responses 041009.doe CIVIL ENGINEERS LAND SURVEYORS PLANNERS CUMBEY & FAIR, INC. 0 1 2463 Enterprise Road • Clearwater, Florida 33763 -1790 • 727 - 797 -8982 (Clw) • 813 - 223 -4333 (Tpa) Fax 727 - 791 -8752 April 10, 2009 DELIVERED Mr. Wayne Wells City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 Re: Steven's Creek Subdivision at 1888 North Betty Lane C &F Job No. 018C Dear Mr. Wells: Enclosed for the City's review and approval are the following items regarding the above referenced project per the City review comments and the DRC meeting of April 2, 2009. 1. Fifteen (15) copies of the revised Flexible Standard Development Application 2. One (1) copy of a reduced color site plan (8 1/2" x 11 3. Two (2) copies of responses to review comments. 4. Two (2) copies of revised Drainage Calculations. 5. Fifteen (15) sets (1 set signed and sealed) of the revised Construction Plans including Preliminary Plat Map; and survey. 6. One (1) set of Building Floor Plan and Elevations. If you have any questions regarding the above material, please contact our office. Very truly yours, CUMBEY & FAIR, INC. P.J. Shah, P.E. PJS /Ic Enclosure xc: Ron Spoor, Habitat for Humanity of Pinellas County (w /encl) J:\ n- C \018C \Words \We11s CityClw 041009pjs.doc Civil Engineers Land Surveyors Planners � 4 Re: Steven's Creek Subdivision at 1888 North Betty Lane C &F Job No. 018C Dear Mr. Wells: Enclosed for the City's review and approval are the following items regarding the above referenced project per the City review comments and the DRC meeting of April 2, 2009. 1. Fifteen (15) copies of the revised Flexible Standard Development Application 2. One (1) copy of a reduced color site plan (8 1/2" x 11 3. Two (2) copies of responses to review comments. 4. Two (2) copies of revised Drainage Calculations. 5. Fifteen (15) sets (1 set signed and sealed) of the revised Construction Plans including Preliminary Plat Map; and survey. 6. One (1) set of Building Floor Plan and Elevations. If you have any questions regarding the above material, please contact our office. Very truly yours, CUMBEY & FAIR, INC. P.J. Shah, P.E. PJS /Ic Enclosure xc: Ron Spoor, Habitat for Humanity of Pinellas County (w /encl) J:\ n- C \018C \Words \We11s CityClw 041009pjs.doc Civil Engineers Land Surveyors Planners Wells, Wayne From: PJ Shah [shah @cumbeyfair.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 1:04 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: land @phfh.org Subject: re: Stevens Creek Subdivision. Planning Comments Dear. Wayne, The Home - Owner's Assoc. has a responsibility to mow the grass at the ponds if the Home -Owner does not. However to play it. safe we will incorporate the revised lot -lines per your review comment. . P. J. > P. J. This is not a question of pond maintenance, to ensure the pond functions properly, unless you are telling me the Homeowners Association is going to also mow the grass on the west side of the pond. This is a question of who will mow the grass from the west side of the pond to the fence, and technically, who is responsible for cutting the grass in the Pineland Drive right -of- way (which I understand from the code enforcement officer for that area has been the subject of complaints by property owners on the west side of Pineland Drive). This goes . to a code enforcement situation, where grass gets too overgrown (tall). Our Community Response Team must cite the property owner (or abutting property owner in the case of overgrown grass in the ROW). If the lot lines go all the way through the pond to the ROW line of Pineland Drive and the pond is wet, how will the property owner get their lawnmower across.the pond to mow the grass on the west side of the pond or within the corresponding ROW? This comment was one of practicality and one of the physical requirement to maintain these areas. It makes more sense to me to run the lot lines as suggested, because certain lot owners may have to physically wade over to mow the west side, as property owners tend to erect fences for privacy and security. This DRC comment may be more of. a recommendation, going to the practicality of the issue, than of Code. You may do as you wish, however, I hope that Habitat is thinking about this issue, as too tall grass is going to be an issue in the future and the property owners need to understand their responsibilities. The Community Response Team will cite the abutting property owner and it will be their responsibility to. mow the grass, even if they can't get from one side of the pond to.the other.. You also need to think about gates within the fencing to allow for maintenance (mowing) of.the grass within the Pineland Drive ROW. Think about what is the right thing to do and lay it out as such. Wayne - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Pi Shah [mailto:shah @cumbeyfair.com] Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 3:27 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Ron Spoor Subject: Re : Stevens Creek Subdivision Planning Comments Dear Wayne, This is to discuss your comment # 11 on Page 21 regarding Maintenance of Pond #1. Attached is a copy of sheet # 3 indicating the modification of the rear lot dimensions @ lot #s 12- 15 per your request.However per SWFWMD the Home - Owner's. Association is responsible for the Maintenance of the Ponds.Therefore modification of the lot -lines are redundant.Can we leave the lot -lines unchanged within the Pond #1 Drainage Easement ? 1 P.J. Shah,PE Cumbey & Fair, Inc. 2463 Enterprise Road Clearwater, FL 33763 -1790 PH:727.797.8982 FX:727.791.8752 Email:shah @cumbeyfair.com Pankaj Shah,PE Cumbey & Fair, Inc. 2463 Enterprise Road Clearwater, FL 33763 -1790 PH:727.797.8982 FX:727.791.8752 Email:shah @cumbeyfair.com Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 4:12 PM To: 'PJ Shah' Cc: Ron Spoor Subject: Stevens Creek Subdivision Planning Comments P. J. - This is not a question of pond maintenance, to ensure the pond functions properly, unless you are telling me the Homeowners Association is going to also mow the grass on the west side of the pond. This is a question of who will mow the grass from the west side of the pond to the fence, and technically, who is responsible for cutting the grass in the Pineland Drive right -of- way (which I understand from the code enforcement officer for that area has been the subject of complaints by property owners on the west side of Pineland Drive). This goes to a code enforcement situation, where grass. gets too overgrown (tall). Our Community Response Team must cite the property owner (or abutting property owner in the case of overgrown grass in the ROW). If the lot lines go all the way through the pond to the ROW line of Pineland Drive and the pond is wet, how will the property owner get their lawnmower across the pond to mow the grass on the west side of the pond or within the corresponding ROW? This comment was one of practicality and one of the physical requirement to maintain these areas. It makes more sense to me to. run the lot lines as suggested, because certain lot owners may have to physically wade over to mow the west side,'as property owners tend to erect fences for privacy and security. This DRC comment may be more of a recommendation, going to the practicality of the issue, than of Code. You may do as you wish, however, I hope that Habitat is thinking about this issue, as too tall grass is going to be an issue in the future and the property owners need to understand their responsibilities. The Community Response Team will. cite the abutting property owner and it will be their responsibility to mow the grass, even if they can't get from one side of the pond to the other. You also need to think about gates within the fencing to allow for maintenance (mowing) of the grass within the Pineland Drive ROW. Think about what is the right thing to do and lay it out as such. Wayne - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Pi Shah [mailto:shah @cumbeyfair.com] Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 3:27 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Ron Spoor Subject: Re : Stevens Creek Subdivision Planning Comments Dear Wayne, This is to discuss your comment # 11 on Page 21 regarding Maintenance of Pond #1. Attached is a copy of sheet # 3 indicating the modification of the rear lot dimensions @ lot #s 12- 15 per your request.However per SWFWMD the Home - Owner's Association is responsible for the Maintenance of the Ponds.Therefore modification of the lot -lines are redundant.Can we leave the lot -lines unchanged within the Pond #1 Drainage Easement ? P.J. Shah,PE Cumbey & Fair, Inc. 2463 Enterprise Road Clearwater, FL 33763 -1790 PH:727.797.8982 FX:727.791.8752 Email:shah @cumbeyfair.com 1 Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Rice, Scott Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 1:45 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FW: FLD2009 -03012 - 1888 N Betty Lane D. Scott Rice, P.E. Assistant Engineering Director City of Clearwater (727) 562 -4781 From: Rice, Scott . Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 10:42 AM To: 'shah @cumbeyfair.com' Cc: Fahey, Robert; Elbo, Bennett; Doherty, Steve Subject: FLD2009 -03012 - 1888 N Betty Lane Mr. Shah, I reviewed your concerns and discussion regarding the water main for the subject project with Utilities Engineering. The City will require that the water main be looped in accordance with Community Development Code Section 3 -1910. To avoid /minimize conflicts, the City will work with you on the route. D. Scott Rice, P.E. Assistant Engineering Director City of Clearwater (727) 562 -4781 4/3/2009 a N h 0 ti 0 a 0 ti W h SITE DATA EXISTING Zoning District: MDR Use: Medium density Multl- family residential Site Area Sq. Ft. (Acres) 387,255 (8.89) PINELAND DRIVE JD 3A (within property lines): 402669,69 Lot Area(Sq.Ft.): N/A Lot Width: N/A 1 N/A LIVing Units 61 60 R/W _ Building Coverage 402744.43 (S9.Ft. and %of Impervious Area): 56,450 (41.5 %) Total Impervious Area (Sq. Ft.): 135,865 Total Impervious Surface (ISR): 0.35 Vehicular Use Area 1329678.04 (Sq.Ft. and % of Impendous Area): 79,415 (58.5%) Gross Floor Area and F.A.R.: N/A Setbacks 1329684.93 (Also Included Dimensions JD 13 On Site Plan Drawing) in Feel 402898.99 Front: 25' 402911.16 JO 15 1329727.70 402917.26 JD 16 1329717.94 (E%. ASPH. PAVi) JD 17 1329716.96 402960.20 ID IB 1129744.05 402990.46 JD 19 - - - - - - E� - - _ - -. -�- - r I J I _ - - --i- r - VALLEY GUTTE CITY OF CL CURB PER ARWATER - - _ IX E4 9AINAGE A UI0.1 CS PROPOSED END VINYL FENCE - - - CONSrr T. SIDEWALK SIDEWWALK CUR - - INDEX 101 BEGIN VINYL FENCE I 12.3' N.0011'44•W 776,10' VINYL FENCE 2 / / Cl 1- I I Ls- Imo. ( L 29 30 31 32 °' 33 34 EAST R W LINE PlIVELANO DRl i I II 105.2 i 11 / I J y � N r L \_ 55.0' 55.0' 55.0 62.6' .6 0 42.0 71.2 w N - 2 PROPOSED DRAINAGE EASEMENT O 60' ON HYDRANT SIDE I POND 7 To o a �' ? W I I I DRAINAGE EASEMENT I -PROP. 10 U TY TU ES M'T. ``, =' I I - L (O.R. 6571. 23F 48.0' 48A' -¢ 42.0' 64.6' '; / 2 .0 4 Fl _ _ _ 188.7' _ _ s 50 49 48 I Ig I _ �' f �2 - - - - - -- O �� fit " - - - -- -- _ -� I ����L� - - - - - - - - - - - o L = =J - - - - - - - - - - / -� - - - - - - - ORIGINAL 51 PAVT. CONST. SIDEWALK CURB _ - CUT RAMP PER G7Y OF - - -- - / 17 16 I CLEARWATER INDEX /109 r /// I�I /1 // N. BETTY LANE PROPOSED I^ 60' R/W APR o 2 3049 I^ a O 10' DRAINAGE•- '? I CITY OF CLEARWATER 12 0, JURIST) CTONAL LINE Q O b ➢lZe- EASEMENT IIL'�'I),I,I m YIe• 15 14 13 ) / / m ' INSTALL NO PARKING D -5 RETAINING ALL 52.3' 55.0' 55.0' - 60.9' -'- IO' UN1Y E9t'i. (O.R. S4I5, PG. 89) I FIRE LANE O 60' ON SIGN SPACED HYDRANT SIDE /I / - - - S.00'11'44 "E 220.00' _ - - - ED PROPOSED OF ROAD - - (TYP.) *o �9' /JD -6 _ r PROP• �5SWER EW T• 10' E IT / 15 .3 ' 42.0 ' 13.0' 23.1' - - [J5� *pa 10 / CENTERINE OF SPRNGTNE BRAN DI 132. Ex 2 VAQYTa nR CU R f - - SITE DATA Side: N/A Rear: 20' Height: - - - - Parking (Per Living Unit): 1.5 -One In gargage and one In drfva"y PROPOSED MDR Single - family residential 387,255 (8.89) 4,019 S.F. 40.9 @ FRONT SETBACK 95' 51 5.74 84,538(61 . 0 % ) 138,698 0.38 54,160 (39.0 %) N/A 19' 5' 10' 30' 2W REQUIRED /ALLOWED (MIN. OR MAX.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 66 7.5 N/A N/A -Tr 74'-ASPICPAVT. 9.0' I / SETBACK a ♦ -- - - - - -- 2 - - - - - -- \ J / G I 19.0, \ 9 SETBA I I R J 7056' hh'7° / -'�, •Q%1 �'� \ I /i' v, TRACT B (TOT 8 y ' 19 FlRE / 4+,� 41 NY9. I 95.7' (I I PROPOSED 4.0' C INC. 127.4' I SIDEWALK ON ONE IDE I I \ I • I 5• / 2� UO 11 `b 4 � I o I I ONLY - REOUESTI II,'n ta. m. 1S 20 I VARIANCE FROM CI REQUIREMENTS I • p 40 I !;, 1 I \ II 1 \ , I Ia I . ii . TY.P. I °% I 134.8' I N' G �¢ \��, I __ ,5� • V: �)V1'( 4; / JD -� 12 7 95.7' FIRE �la c b 21 43 i 4c PROPOSED 10' UTILITY N ♦-I I I 1 39 ' • I R EASEMENT FOR POWER, 1• / / / i61 �' r- t0 I I V !.0' J \''( ( (gy p TEEEPHONE, AND CABLE TV I�////j / v 95.7' i P� 6 122.0' c) 1 \'._ w / D 1 WETLAND TABLE POINT EXISTING Zoning District: MDR Use: Medium density Multl- family residential Site Area Sq. Ft. (Acres) 387,255 (8.89) Gross Area JD 3A (within property lines): 402669,69 Lot Area(Sq.Ft.): N/A Lot Width: N/A Lot Depth: N/A LIVing Units 61 Density (units/ac.): 6.97 Building Coverage 402744.43 (S9.Ft. and %of Impervious Area): 56,450 (41.5 %) Total Impervious Area (Sq. Ft.): 135,865 Total Impervious Surface (ISR): 0.35 Vehicular Use Area 1329678.04 (Sq.Ft. and % of Impendous Area): 79,415 (58.5%) Gross Floor Area and F.A.R.: N/A Setbacks 1329684.93 (Also Included Dimensions JD 13 On Site Plan Drawing) in Feel 402898.99 Front: 25' Side: N/A Rear: 20' Height: - - - - Parking (Per Living Unit): 1.5 -One In gargage and one In drfva"y PROPOSED MDR Single - family residential 387,255 (8.89) 4,019 S.F. 40.9 @ FRONT SETBACK 95' 51 5.74 84,538(61 . 0 % ) 138,698 0.38 54,160 (39.0 %) N/A 19' 5' 10' 30' 2W REQUIRED /ALLOWED (MIN. OR MAX.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 66 7.5 N/A N/A -Tr 74'-ASPICPAVT. 9.0' I / SETBACK a ♦ -- - - - - -- 2 - - - - - -- \ J / G I 19.0, \ 9 SETBA I I R J 7056' hh'7° / -'�, •Q%1 �'� \ I /i' v, TRACT B (TOT 8 y ' 19 FlRE / 4+,� 41 NY9. I 95.7' (I I PROPOSED 4.0' C INC. 127.4' I SIDEWALK ON ONE IDE I I \ I • I 5• / 2� UO 11 `b 4 � I o I I ONLY - REOUESTI II,'n ta. m. 1S 20 I VARIANCE FROM CI REQUIREMENTS I • p 40 I !;, 1 I \ II 1 \ , I Ia I . ii . TY.P. I °% I 134.8' I N' G �¢ \��, I __ ,5� • V: �)V1'( 4; / JD -� 12 7 95.7' FIRE �la c b 21 43 i 4c PROPOSED 10' UTILITY N ♦-I I I 1 39 ' • I R EASEMENT FOR POWER, 1• / / / i61 �' r- t0 I I V !.0' J \''( ( (gy p TEEEPHONE, AND CABLE TV I�////j / v 95.7' i P� 6 122.0' c) 1 \'._ w / D 1 WETLAND TABLE POINT NORTHING EASTNG JD 2 1329694.55 402621.37 JD 3 1329695.90 402651.29 JD 3A 1129694.22 402669,69 JD 4 1329696.43 4026 85 .15 JD 5 1329688.77 40270fi.'0 JD 6 13296]8.46 402733,58 JO 7 1129678.20 402744.43 JD 8 1329669.90 402762.92 JD 9 1329669.52 402786.20 JD 10 1329678.04 402833.79 JD I1 1329684.27 402857.93 JD 12 1329684.93 402881.17 JD 13 1329699.79 402898.99 JD 14 1329714.85 402911.16 JO 15 1329727.70 402917.26 JD 16 1329717.94 4029 }4.31 JD 17 1329716.96 402960.20 ID IB 1129744.05 402990.46 JD 19 1329786.80 403027.20 JD 20 1329809.95 403049.92 JD 21 1329845.58 403067.42 Z 40 20 0 40 SCALE IN FEET 1" = 40' LINE TABLE: LNE BEA DSTANCE L 5 0NG 21 12.10' 1_2 FS 8701'50" E 34.99' L3 S 82 E 45.84' L4 S 71' 5 1159' E 36.51' LS N 87' W 74.97' L6 N 63'58'51" E 95.75' L7 N 85'46'33" E 36.91' LB N 53'58'01" E 90.90' I N 37'01'56" E 69.89' WIT -0 N J6- 58'15" E 11.22' LEGEND BOUNDARY LINE - . WETLAND JURISDICTIONAL LINE DENOTES WETLAND BUFFER AREA DENOTES WETLAND BUFFER COMPENSTATION AREA DENOTES WETLAND BUFFER DEFICIT AREA I `S ; - D (O.R. 6531, PG, 235 0) RREE PRESERVATI EX w' axc. 4 unL cw 'r 3 EASEMENT 15 0 44 c I JD -17 WETLAND 22 \ / / PRESERVATION . F- -I EASEMENT CID 00 95.7' I 2I 122.0' EXI ALLEY 2p 5 , 2 c I CI I I : \ 1611 UTTER CURB \ S. �\ ' / °J (TYP. BOTH SIDES) f'PSQNS� •4. \ 1.6' / -1B `b WETLAND /// I�j? 12 I 45 POND J 5 /// JURISDICTIONAL 325 37 I I I ($nl PROPOSED I \ \\ \ N I 23 I a I I I o' unuTr EASEMENT I - - I I °I 122.0' n� \ \'\ 4 \D -1 �9 I I FII 95.7• I I I I 2n1 . `d I \\ �.\ 156• �..: ' / % } ' I 46 36 \\ JD -zo 'I _EX__ TL E9l'i. '2' (O.R 5401. PG I \!- / /�• 10' -25' ° 24 E�j(IS : I PROPOSED \ \ \ ,�P A �/9• p 14 ASP DRAINAGE \'• \ to E z O C � W I 122.0' 0 -10' W Z � I% J EXIST. V VALLEY Q L6 35 o�n��'�.\ 928 GUTTER CURB (TYP. BOTH SIDES) 5' I I o nLaJ 47 J, m 25 = I C I O 30'40' 46.0 Z G F- 122.0' 2 2 PROPOSED 10 UTIUN w W 63.2' LLLEASEMENT FOR POWER, c Tr.LEPHONE, AND CABLE N W to CONST. 80.0 L . 2 < 149¢ N U 11 o a 26 V`I VALLEY GUTTER C RB CITY OF CLEAR All I I ¢ (n K :;, I INDEX /110 I 957' '� I INSTALL 'NO 10' UTILITY o 8 FIRE LANE' SIGN SPACE CONST. 82. L.F. 2.0' I O 60' ON HYDRANT SIDE i III''""���1���"EX /ST. STORMWA TC� r I J I I OF (TYP.) I e [/ I I r VALLEY GUTTE CITY OF CL CURB PER ARWATER -FlR� 95.7' p 28.0' _ IX E4 9AINAGE A UI0.1 CS - - - CONSrr T. SIDEWALK SIDEWWALK CUR - - to E z O C � W W 3 Z W Z � I% Q� Z Q L6 35 o�n��'�.\ 928 > O I I Y Z J, m F 3 e I/ I C I O 42. ' 46.0 Z G W O ce aN 427,7' m 48.0' PROP. 20' DRAINAGE 8 I-, ESM'T. - 42.0' 58.5' 2 P AINACE 48.0' ® PROPOSED.. < 149¢ N U tlm I E SENENT '� ./ `r d/ ' 10' UTILITY CONST. 82. L.F. 2.0' 1� \ III''""���1���"EX /ST. STORMWA TC� W I j 'ER I EASEMENT VALLEY GUTTE CITY OF CL CURB PER ARWATER I I;. 1 I 190.6' D TENTION I TO REMAIN INDEX 101 I 12.3' I I POND 1,` 2 / / Cl 1- I I Ls- Imo. ( L 29 30 31 32 °' 33 34 i I II 1 INSTALL 'NO PARKING \ / I J y � N r L \_ FIRE LANE' SIGN SPACED o O 60' ON HYDRANT SIDE I OF ROAD (TYP.) I -PROP. 10 U TY TU ES M'T. =' I I - L (O.R. 6571. 23F 48.0' 48A' 48.0' 42.0' 64.6' '; / 2 .0 4 Fl _ _ _ 188.7' _ _ 4A� e XL / ?4 --- ExsSF- - - - - -- 5.60aB727'�ig909' - - -� r - - -- _ �' f �2 - - - - - -- O �� fit " - - - -- -- _ -� I ����L� - - - - - - - - - - - o L = =J - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -� - - - - - - - ORIGINAL ETC 2' VALLEY GUTTER CURB Ex 26' ASPH. PAVT. CONST. SIDEWALK CURB _ - CUT RAMP PER G7Y OF - - -- - - - - - CLEARWATER INDEX /109 �'LCl.C1YG N. BETTY LANE 60' R/W APR o 2 3049 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER b ➢lZe- to E z O C � 4a% ,L 4.1 C E , A V •� EN c m 3 � oMN a _ w`o Qo A_ _to a O W W z �W 1yj w 00o a�" n n 7 a U 0 0 0 = w ¢ a a ¢ Q O 4 O D Y 0 Z V1 a� U d V1 t4' a O Y Y Y To zm m m 3 C2 Y 0 no 19 z LU Z - d t1 H OIS Y W H m H W W y Q H H is W O 6 zz � W � N W W Z W Z � I% Q� Z Q L6 W a; ', rr > O W Z J, m F 3 e n °¢ n ¢ Z G W O ce aN V 0. ¢ Wp ; ® < 149¢ N U 4a% ,L 4.1 C E , A V •� EN c m 3 � oMN a _ w`o Qo A_ _to a O W W z �W 1yj w 00o a�" n n 7 a U 0 0 0 = w ¢ a a ¢ Q O 4 O D Y 0 Z V1 a� U d V1 t4' a O Y Y Y To zm m m 3 C2 Y 0 no 19 z LU Z - d t1 H OIS Y W H m H W W y Q H H is W O 6 zz � W � N Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 5:51 PM To: 'land @phfh.org' Subject: FLD2009 -03012 and PLT2009- 00001, 1888 N. Betty Lane Ronald - Attached are the Draft comments for the above referenced project (the FLD and PLT cases), to be discussed at the April 2, 2009, DRC meeting, occurring at 1:00 pm in the Planning Department offices. Should you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Wayne M. Wells, AICP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 -5520 Phone: 727 - 562 -4504 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 L�J Draft 4.2.09 Draft 4.2.09 C Action AgendC Action Agend Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 6:35 PM To: 'land @phfh.org' Subject: FLD2009 -03012 - 1888 N. Betty Lane Ronald - Attached is a Letter of Completeness for the above referenced Flexible Development application. The original letter is being mailed to you. Wayne M. Wells, AICP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 -5520 Phone: 727 - 562 -4504 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 Letter of ipleteness 3.11. LL 4 ea rwater U March 11, 2009 Ronald E Spoor 3071 118th Avenue North St Petersburg, F133716 CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562 -4567 FAX: (727) 562 -4576 W W W . MYCLEARWATER. C OM VIA FAX: 727 - 209 -2191 RE: FLD2009 -03012 -- 1888 N BETTY LN -- Letter of Completeness Dear Ronald E Spoor: The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2009- 03012. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is complete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on April 02, 2009, in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in downtown Clearwater. You will be contacted by the Planning Department's Administrative Analyst within one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. Additional comments may be generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727 -562 -4504 or Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, rv_ r v g& Wa e Wells. AICP Planner III Letter of Completeness - FLD2009 -03012 -1888 N BETTYLN 02Tl CUMBEY & FAIR, INC. 2463 Enterprise Road • Clearwater, Florida 33763 -1790 • 727 - 797 -8982 (Clw) • 813 - 223 -4333 (Tpa) • Fax 727- 791 -8752 March 10, 2009 Mr. Wayne Wells City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 Re: Steven's Creek Subdivision at 1888 North Betty Lane C&F Job No. 018C Dear Mr. Wells: i!L��►�IJ:7J Enclosed for the City's review and approval are the following items regarding the above referenced project per the Letter of Incompleteness dated March 5, 2009. 1. Fifteen (15) copies of the revised Flexible Standard Development Application (one original signed by the Applicant and fourteen (14) copies). 2. Floor plan typicals as provided by the Developer. 3. One (1) copy of a reduced color site plan (8 1/2" x 11 ") 4. Typical Building Elevation drawings as provided by the Developer. 5. Typical reduced Building Elevations (8 1/2"x 11 "). 6. Fifteen (15) copies, signed and sealed, of the revised Sheet 3 Site and Sidewalk Plan. Also included are fifteen (15) copies, signed and sealed, of the Preliminary Plat that will be reinserted into the Site construction Plan set submitted on March 2, 2009. The copy of the Preliminary Plat was pulled out of the set on March 2, 2009 to create a separate submittal for the Preliminary Plat application. If you have any questions regarding the above material, please contact our office. Very truly yours, CUMBEY & FAIR, INC. Ri�- P.J. Shah, P.E. PJS /Ic Enclosure xc: Ron Spoor, Habitat for Humanity of Pinellas County (w /encl) J:\jn- C \018C \Words \QtyC1w 030209pjs.doc via V Civil Engineers Land Surveyors Planners Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 9:33 AM To: 'land @phfh.org' Subject: FLD2009 -03012 and PLT2009- 00001, 1888 N. Betty Lane Ronald - Attached is a Letter of Incompleteness for the above referenced Flexible Development application and a Letter of Completeness for the Preliminary Plat application. The original letters are being mailed to you. Wayne M. Wells, AICP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 -5520 Phone: 727 - 562 -4504 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 KERA la� T Letter of Letter of )mpleteness 3.5pleteness 3.5.0 e� °Clearwater March 05, 2009 Ronald E Spoor 3071 118th Avenue North St Petersburg. Fl 33716 CITY OF CLEAWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562 -4567 FAX: (727) 562 -4576 W W W . MYC LEARW AT ER. C OM VIA FAX: 727 - 209 -2191 RE: FLD2009 -03012 -- 1888 N BETTY LN -- Letter of Incompleteness Dear Ronald E Spoor: The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2009- 03012. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is Incomplete with the following comments. 1. On Page 1 of the application, provide the project valuation. 2. In order to legally advertise the request and for DRC review, there must be more specificity than indicated on Page 1 of the application: a. You indicate a lot area less than 5,000 square feet on Page 1 of the application and 3000 square feet minimum on Sheet 3 of the drawings. However, on the Preliminary Plat, the smallest lot area indicated is 4,019 square feet. Need to indicate the smallest lot area proposed; b. YW" indivaL °v a . I `v'Y�id Lh Cf 1e.0 Lxl ix JV I%, L YY I%A on PRA., 1 Vl UlV 0.YY lll.a L."n Q1ILL JV -JV feet wide on Sheet 3 of the drawings. Lot width is measured at the front setback line, per our Code definition. If you are requesting a minimum setback of 19 feet that will be applied to all lots, then Sheet 3 needs to indicate the lot width at the setback line for all lots (some lots have a front lot line with a curvature of 33.5 feet). The application would then include in the request the smallest lot width indicated on the plan; and c. You indicate a requested front setback of 19 feet on Page 1 of the application, yet on Sheet 3 in the Site Data it is indicated 20 feet to the garage. However, on the drawing of a typical layout (Lots 24 & 25), it is dimensioned as 24 feet minimum to the garage. Unclear of the front setback desired. Please keep in mind the comments under "b" above related to where lot width is measured. 3. On Page 4 of the application, ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following): Stormwater plan as noted above is included. Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. 4. Provide floor plan typicals of detached dwellings for all Level One (flexible standard development) and Level Two approvals. 5. Provide a REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11). Letter of Incompleteness - FLD2009 -03011 -1888 N BETTYLN LL CITY OF CLEARWATER rWater PLANNING DEPARTMENT " MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562 -4567 FAX: (727) 562 -4576 W W W . MYCLEARWATER. C OM March 05, 2009 6. Provide typical BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - with the following information: All sides of all buildings; _Dimensioned; _Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations); and _Materials. 7. Provide typical REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS to scale on 8 %2 X 11. 8. On Page 7 of the application - Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): _Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post- development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. _Traffic Impact Study is not required. 9. On Page 7 of the application - Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations /water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): _Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included. Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is not required. Section 4 -202 of the Community Development Code states that if an application is deemed incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff. No further development review action shall be taken until the deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit by Tuesday, March 10, 2009, at NOON. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727 -562 -4504 or Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, Wa eWellV�s)t% Planner III Letter of Incompleteness - FLD2009 -03012 -1888 N BE77T LN I_ �U1VIS�Y &FAIR, INC. 2463 Enterprise Road • Clearwater, Florida 33763 -1790 • 727 - 797 -8982 (Clw) • 813 - 223 -4333 (Tpa) • Fax 727 - 791 -8752 City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 Attn: Scott Kurleman March 2, 2009 DELIVERED OR1GIML RPCFW-D Re: Steven's Creek Subdivision at MAR 0 2 2009 I ova North Betty Lane C&F �S . V NT C8�F Job No. 018C OF CLEARWA Gentlemen: � , Enclosed for the City's review and approval are the following items regarding the above referenced project: 1. A check in the amount of $1,100.00: a. $600.00 for Preliminary Plat Application Form b. $200.00 for Fire Preliminary Site Plan c. $300.00 for Flexible Development Application Form 2. Fifteen (15) copies of the Flexible Standard Development Application (one original signed by the Applicant and fourteen (14) copies). 3. Fifteen (15) copies of the Preliminary Plat Application (one original signed by the Applicant and fourteen (14) copies). 4. A copy of the Warranty Deed. 5. Three (3) copies of Drainage Calculations (signed and sealed) 6. A copy of the SWFWMD ERP submittal letter. 7. Fifteen (15) copies of the Boundary Survey (one original signed and sealed and fourteen (14) copies). 8. Arborist's Report (tree inventory) by Alan Mayberry. 9. Fifteen (15) copies, signed and sealed, of the Site Construction Plans. An 8 1/2 "x11" color Exhibit of the Site Plan will be submitted at a later date. The project was discussed at the BPRC meeting on November 5, 2008. As discussed at the meeting, a variance is requested for constructing sidewalk on one side of the road and the streets are proposed to be private. If you have any questions regarding this above material, please contact our office. Very truly yours, CUMBEY & FAIR, INC. UUME _ P.J. Shah, P.E. PJS /lc Enclosure c: Ron Spoor, Habitat for Humanity of Pinellas County (w /encl) J:yn- C \018C \Words \QtyC1w 030209pjs.doc Civil Engineers Land Surveyors Planners z CDB Meeting Date: May 19, 2009 ORIGINAL Case Numbers: FLD2009- 03012/PLT2009 -00001 Agenda Item: E2. Owner /Applicant: Habitat for Humanity of Pinellas County Representative: Ronald E. Spoor, Land Development Manager, Habitat for Humanity of Pinellas Coun Address: 1888 N. Be !!y Lane CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: (1) Flexible Development approval to permit a 51 -lot subdivision for detached dwellings in the Medium Density Residential (MDR) District with a minimum lot area of 4,019 square feet, a minimum lot width of 40.9 feet (measured at the front setback line) and a reduction to the front setback requirement from 25 to 19 feet (to building), as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 304.G; and (2) Preliminary Plat approval for a 51 -lot subdivision for detached dwellings. CURRENT ZONING: Medium Density Residential (MDR) District CURRENT FUTURE LAND Residential Urban (RU) and Preservation (P) USE CATEGORY: PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Vacant (formerly a 61 -unit attached dwelling complex) Proposed Use: 51 -lot subdivision for detached dwellings EXISTING North: Medium Density Residential (MDR) District and Pinellas SURROUNDING ZONING County AND USES: Detached dwellings South: Medium Density Residential (MDR) District Detached dwellings and Attached dwellings East: Institutional (I) District Public school West: Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District and Pinellas County Detached dwellings Community Development Board — May 19, 2009 FLD2009- 03012/PLT2009 -00001 —Page 1 of 7 ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 8.89 acres is located on the south side of Sunset Point Road between N. Betty Lane and Pineland Drive. The property was previously developed with a 61 -unit attached dwelling complex (Homer Villas), which was demolished in July 2008. While the buildings were demolished, the roadways within the property have been retained for use in the proposed subdivision. There is a jurisdictional wetland area for Spring Branch Creek along the northern property line with a Preservation (P) land use designation. The properties to the north within the City are zoned Medium Density Residential (MDR) District and are developed with detached dwellings. Properties to the west within the City are zoned Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District and are developed with detached dwellings. A majority of the properties to the north and west of the subject property are presently located within unincorporated Pinellas County and are developed with detached dwellings. Properties to the south are zoned Medium Density Residential (MDR) District and are developed with seven detached dwellings fronting on N. Betty Lane and an attached dwelling complex (1770 N. Betty Lane). Property to the east is zoned Institutional (I) District and is developed with a public school. Development Proposal: Habitat for Humanity of Pinellas County proposes to redevelop the subject property with a 51 -lot subdivision for detached dwellings. This project will provide affordable housing for families. To accomplish such affordability, the applicant is striving to reduce the cost of the development by providing reasonably sized lots to accommodate typical Habitat dwellings and by utilizing the existing infrastructure, including the streets, water mains and sanitary sewer lines. The location of this existing infrastructure requires reductions to development standards within the MDR District, including minimum lot area, minimum lot width and minimum front setbacks. The proposed Stevens Creek Drive will be a private street 28 feet in width and will be maintained by a homeowners association. Public sidewalks will be constructed on both sides of the street within easements. Existing water and sewer lines are either located within the proposed private street right -of -way or are located adjacent to the right -of -way within proposed utility easements. Forty-two (42) of the 51 lots will take driveway access from Stevens Creek Drive. Five lots (Lots 29 — 33) will front on and take driveway access from N. Betty Lane. Four lots (Lots 48 — 51) will front on and take driveway access from Pineland Drive. A tot lot (Tract B) is proposed as an amenity to this subdivision, located between Lots 41 and 42, and will be maintained by a homeowners association. The redevelopment of this property with a detached dwelling subdivision will be consistent with the majority of the surrounding development, which are primarily detached dwellings. This detached dwelling subdivision will be compatible with this surrounding developed character and represent an upgrade from the prior attached dwelling complex that was demolished in 2008. The redevelopment of the subject property is otherwise impractical without the proposed deviations to minimum lot area, minimum lot width and front setbacks, and such flexibility will be a benefit to the surrounding area and the City in general by providing affordable housing for families. The Preliminary Plat for this subdivision complies with the design standards of the Community Development Code. A Final Plat will be required to be approved and accepted by City Council prior to recording in the public records. Impervious Surface Ratio (I.S.R.): In the Residential Urban (RU) land use category, the allowable I.S.R is 0.65. Compliance with this requirement will need to be demonstrated on the site plan with each dwelling when applying for building permits. Minimum Lot Area and Width: Pursuant to the Community Development Code (CDC) Table 2 -302 for the Medium Density Residential (MDR) District, the Minimum Standard Development for detached dwellings requires a minimum lot area of 5,000 square feet and a minimum lot width of 50 feet. This Community Development Board — May 19, 2009 FLD2009- 03012/PLT2009 -00001 — Page 2 of 7 proposal is being processed as a Residential Infill Project due to the front setback reduction of 19 feet, in order to. place an adequately sized dwelling on these lots. Under the Residential Infill Project use, there are no minimum lot area or lot width requirements. The applicant is proposing a minimum lot area of 4,019 square feet and a minimum lot width (measured at the front setback line) of 40.9 feet. To produce affordable housing in this project, the applicant is striving to reduce the cost of the development by providing reasonably sized lots to accommodate typical Habitat dwellings and by utilizing the existing infrastructure, including the streets, water mains and sanitary sewer lines. The depth of the lots on the south side of the southern leg of Stevens Creek Drive is limited to 95 feet, and where the developable area is further limited by an existing 15 -foot wide drainage and utility easement along the southern property line. The lots on this southern side are proposed at a lot width of 42 feet, producing the 4,019 square -foot minimum lot area requested under this approval. There are only 12 lots, or 23 percent, out of the total 51 lots in this subdivision with a lot area less than the normally required 5,000 square feet. Lot width is measured at the front setback line. There are 30 out of the 51 total lots (58.8 percent) with lot widths less than the normally required 50 -foot width. Most lots are internal to the subdivision, but five lots (9.8 percent; Lots 29 — 33) do front on N. Betty. Lane.. Lots in the surrounding area are developed with a minimum 50 -foot lot width. Minimum Setbacks: Pursuant to Table 2 -302 for Minimum Standard Development, the minimum setbacks in the MDR District for detached dwellings are 25 -foot front, five -foot side and 10 -foot rear. The proposal includes a reduction to the front setback from 25 to 19 feet, which requires processing this application as a Residential Infill Project. The applicant is proposing to utilize the existing infrastructure, including the streets, water mains and sanitary sewer lines, which limit the depth of lots on the south side of the southern leg of Stevens Creek Drive. The proposed front setback of 19 feet is to porches on the front of the dwellings, where the front of the garage will be setback approximately 27 feet in order to provide one parking space within the driveway so that vehicles do not hang over the public sidewalk. Given these circumstances, and the purpose to provide affordable housing, the reduction to the front setback is appropriate. The applicant has indicated on the plans that many of the lots will be able to meet the required front setback of 25 feet, depending on the floor plan chosen. Maximum Building Height: The maximum building height in the MDR District for detached dwellings is 30 feet. Due to the proposed reduced front setback for this subdivision, this application is being processed as a Residential Infill Project, where the maximum building height is listed at 30 — 50 feet.. The applicant has indicated that this proposal will maintain a maximum building height of 30 feet, which is consistent with the MDR District standards. Minimum Off - Street Parking: Two parking spaces are required for detached dwellings in the MDR District. The proposal is to provide two parking spaces for each dwelling, one in the garage and one in the driveway, which is consistent with Code requirements. Mechanical Equipment: Pursuant to CDC Section 3- 903.H.1, air conditioning and similar mechanical equipment is exempt from the side and rear setback requirements, but such equipment must be screened from view from streets and adjacent property. Outside condensing units for air conditioners will be placed adjacent to the side or rear. of the dwellings. Screening requirements will be reviewed during the building permit process. Utilities:. Pursuant to CDC Section 3- 1908.A, all on -site utility lines must be placed underground. This proposal will comply with this requirement. Solid Waste:. Each dwelling will be provided a black barrel for solid waste disposal. The applicant has indicated these black barrels will be stored exterior to the dwelling. CDC Section 3- 201.D.1 of the Community Development Board — May 19, 2009 FLD2009- 03012/PLT2009 -00001 — Page 3 of 7 Community Development Code requires these black barrels to be screened from view from streets and adjacent properties. Provisions for walls, fences or other appropriate screening materials will be required with the construction of each dwelling. Si nape: There are presently no proposed subdivision signs for.this property. Should any such signs be desired, appropriate provisions in the Sign Code must be met. Code Enforcement Analysis: There is no outstanding Code Enforcement issue associated with the subject property. COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the detached dwelling subdivision proposal with the standards as per CDC Tables 2 -301.1 and 2 -304: 1_ See analysis in Staff Report Community Development Board — May 19, 2009 FLD2009- 03012/PLT2009 -00001 — Page 4 of 7 Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent Density 7.5. du/acre 5.74 du/acre X Minimum N/A 4,019 square feet X' Lot Area Minimum N/A 40.9 feet (measured at the front X1, Lot Width setback line Minimum Front:. 10 — 25 feet 19 feet X' Setbacks Side: 0 — 5 feet 5 feet X Rear: 0 — 10 feet 10 feet X Maximum 30 — 50 feet 30 feet X Height Minimum Two spaces per dwelling unit Two spaces per dwelling unit X Off - Street Parking (one in the garage and one in the driveway) 1_ See analysis in Staff Report Community Development Board — May 19, 2009 FLD2009- 03012/PLT2009 -00001 — Page 4 of 7 COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per CDC Section 2 -304.G (Residential Infill Project): Consistent I Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is X Inconsistent otherwise impractical without deviations from one or more of the following:. X intensity or other development standards. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill X project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. 3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the district. X 4. The uses within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses. X 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill X project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. X 6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function X which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel X proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height, off - street parking, access X or other development standards are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3 -913: Community Development Board — May 19, 2009 FLD2009- 03012/PLT2009 -00001 — Page 5 of 7 Consistent Inconsistent 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. Community Development Board — May 19, 2009 FLD2009- 03012/PLT2009 -00001 — Page 5 of 7 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meetings of April 2, 2009, and deemed the development proposal to be sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: Findings of Fact: The Planning Department, having reviewed all evidence submitted by the applicant and requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact: 1. The 8.89 acres is located on the south side of Sunset Point Road between N. Betty Lane and Pineland Drive; 2. The property was previously developed with a 61 -unit attached dwelling complex (Homer Villas), which was demolished in July 2008; 3. The surrounding area is primarily developed with detached dwellings, although an attached dwelling complex is located to the south and a public school is located to the east of the subject property; 4. The applicant, Habitat for Humanity of Pinellas County, proposes to redevelop the subject property with a 51 -lot subdivision for detached dwellings providing affordable housing for families; 5. The applicant is proposing to utilize the existing infrastructure, including the streets, water mains and sanitary sewer lines, where such location of this infrastructure requires flexibility with minimum lot area, minimum lot width and minimum front setback standards; 6. The proposed Stevens Creek Drive will be a private street 28 feet in width and will be maintained by a homeowners association; 7. A tot lot (Tract B) is proposed as an amenity to this subdivision, located between Lots 41 and 42, and will be maintained by a homeowners association; 8. The proposal includes a minimum lot area of 4,019 square feet and a minimum lot width (measured at the front setback line) of 40.9 feet; 9. The proposal includes a reduction to the front setback from 25 to 19 feet, but additional front setback will be provided to the garage door to preclude a vehicle parked in the driveway from overhanging the public sidewalk; 10. The Preliminary Plat for this subdivision complies with the design standards of the Community Development Code. A Final Plat will be required to be approved and accepted by City Council prior to recording in the public records; and . 11. There is no outstanding Code Enforcement issue associated with the subject property. Conclusions of Law: The Planning Department, having made the above findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Tables 2 -301.1 and 2 -304 of the Community Development Code; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2 -304.G of the Community Development Code; 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Section 3 -913 of the Community Development Code; and 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the requirements for Preliminary Plats in Sections 4 -704, 4 -705 and 4 -709 of the Community Development Code. Based upon the above, the Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the (1) Flexible Development application to permit a 51 -lot subdivision for detached dwellings in the Medium Density Residential (MDR) District with a minimum lot area of 4,019 square feet, a minimum lot width of 40.9 feet (measured at the front setback line) and a reduction to the front setback requirement from 25 to 19 Community Development Board — May 19, 2009 FLD2009- 03012/PLT2009 -00001 — Page 6 of 7 feet (to building), as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 304.G; and (2) Preliminary Plat approval for a 51 -lot subdivision for detached dwellings, with the following conditions: Conditions of Approval: 1. That the following minimum setbacks apply to this subdivision: a. front: 19 feet to porches and additional setback be provided to the garage doors to preclude vehicles parked in driveways from overhanging the public sidewalks; b. side: five feet; c. rear: 10 feet; 2. That the maximum building height be 30 feet; 3. That black barrels stored exterior to the dwelling and outdoor mechanical equipment be screened from view from adjacent streets and properties; 4. That, based on the provisions of Section 3 -804.E and the prevailing lot pattern of the surrounding area, the maximum height of the fence proposed along the rear of Lots 10 -17 be three feet.. Additionally, gates must be installed in the fence for Lots 10, 11, 16 and 17 to allow for the mowing of grass within the rights -of -wayy by the abutting lot owners; 5. That sidewalks be provided on both sides of Stevens Creek Drive; and 6. That, prior to the issuance of a building permit to construct the subdivision improvements, plans be revised to comply with all requirements of General Engineering, Environmental Engineering, Stormwater Engineering, Traffic Engineering and the Land Resource Specialist. Prepared by Planning Department Staff: kmit. M - b—)& Wayne p. Wells, AICP, Planner III ATTACHMENTS: ❑ Location Map ❑ Aerial Map ❑ Zoning Map ❑ Existing Surrounding Uses Map ❑ Photographs of Site and Vicinity S. IPlanning DepartmentlCD BIFLEX (FLD)IPending casesl Up for the next CDBIBetty N 1888 Stevens Creek Subdivision (MDR) 2009.05 - 5.19.09 CDB - WWIBetty N 1888 StaJfReport.doc Community Development Board — May 19, 2009 FLD2009- 03012/PLT2009 -00001 — Page 7 of 7 = m O z a COMMODORE ST m PORT m ST " " "' '' :..:.::.::..::., 1 :.... w IDLEWILD :; ' :`:Z::;:�1f>r `� = . J• o z N h z I ° d ST n 8 DCACA7. c GRANADA WOODLAWN a.. s RD Z ST p J IVA ST SEDEEVA C . . ;.;i ;',: :; ;:{} '.� : •.:, DR O ._.. BYE ST SEDEEVA .": ;!.';:; CIR S f.'::;'BL1i01L1:� RD LL DR:!Qi1t[;:,iri• W W ¢ ¢ :ii;'• r .'.i :i :'tZ -'' :`: I'.:'`::f:'j z K SA'. '�.: •: ': •Q 1. r;. •. �".�•�R{DAN:•..r:�:•: :::•. •U:'•::�'::•: •:.:••:::t:•'•::�:•::•::::I ¢ U¢ WILSON RD SUNSET POINT RD CPS- BFG:.:..' .::': :: :. �..:.�. .::...�.....ti�...�.._u �.. SUNSET Cardov O Ow F C` F- z w c Z .:' .:'::.:; .x ` 0 SPRING LA 0 m¢ CL �.-;..;::: THAMES LA S •��:.f° m p tip PJ0 Sy Qp z W 5.:.:•;.:•:• •. a .=i; ;:';• {.� � o cg JOEL BENTLEY Q OAF Rey �r :':• ::: '••:.. '::'' "n U t��v� PROJECT OTTEN t T �..i OO/r :.,..'.,..• .... •;.'•:..::� SITE HEAVEN ::3C LILY S9 '`� ' .! SANDY SENT LA r. :'ct���• r•-.. -i .':: w t D� �• �'I .: : MARY L LA 0 iL.� V RD 5 SA i•. i4 I..: •.: TERRACE RD ;''•'-i' •" O ST Z O .._,' L� FAIRMQNT ST ?:� ` FAIRMONT ST BECKETT ¢ � ti • 0 3t. �:':: ST w > ¢ BECKETT ST � ••��, sJ M D Q PARKWOOD LOCATION MAP Owner: Habitat for Humanity of Pinellas County Cases: FLD2009 -03012 PLT2009 -00001 Site: 1888 N. Betty Lane Property Size: 8.89 acres PIN: 03- 29 -15- 00000 - 420 -0140 Atlas Page: 2608 8 7 1.::% ... . 191 7 L91`1-1 ..... t SUNSET POINT RD 00 4595 SAS) 12$ 40 6 1884 1882 1876 co co isle 1874 46; 00 1860 1863 10 1864 1862 1858 — — — --- — — — — — — — — S. 313.46 1836 A. 1830 3 F7121 is 4 C4 5 1826 1806 JT 1800 171822 Val 190.88 ZONING MAP Owner: Habitat for Humanity of Pinellas County Cases: FLD2009-03012 PLT2009-00001 Site: 1888 N. Betty Lane Property Size: 8.89 acres PIN: 03-29-15-00000-420-0140 Atlas Page: 260B 8 7 D. ...... 1901 . .. ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . SUNSET POINT RD 00 459.5 1251 so 1884 Public School 1876 co 1874 00 Go 1860 4 :.1 4 1863 lings 1864 1862 1868 27 - - - - - - - - - MEN-MOSSOMM -731340 Detache& dwellinoo Attached - — z F Public 3 1124 -4 dwellings School 4 1.11�18 Uj DetachqA, 161828 dwellin Mo 171822 EXISTING SURROUNDING USES MAP Owner: Habitat for Humanity of Pinellas County Cases: FLD2009-03012 PLT2009-00001 Site: 1888 N. Betty Lane Property Size: 8.89 acres PIN: 03-29-15-00000-420-0140 Atlas Page: 260B \t1 I Engineering Condition Conditions Associated Wit FLD2009 -03012 1888 N BETTY LN Steve Doherty 03/24/2009 Prior to review by the Community Development Board: 562 -4773 1. Sidewalks are required along both sides of all public and private streets. (Community Development Code Sections 3 -1701 and 3 -1907 and Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards, Article 30). In addition, subdivision design shall where practical provide 19 -feet between back of sidewalk to garage doors to discourage parked vehicles from blocking sidewalks. COMPLETED SIDEWALK WILL BE NEEDED AS A BUILDING PERMIT CONDITION WITH UNDERSTANDING 19 -FOOT PARKING AREA WILL NOT BE PROVIDED IN EVERY DRIVEWAY. 2. The plan submitted indicates that the water main on Pineland is proposed to be capped. This will leave a dead -end line in place of a looped system. This will present a water quality problem for the City of Clearwater and existing service customers on Pineland. Can this line be reconnected along a parcel line not passing under a retention pond so as to maintain the loop and allow for the proposed construction? MET 3. Agree to provide an additional 10 -foot drainage easement along the existing 7.5 -foot easement lying along the north property line of proposed Lot 48 to provide for maintance of proposed 24 -inch storm pipe. MET Prior to the issuance of a building permit: 1. Show on the water and sewer plan the location of chlorination and sample points for the new water main. 2. Sample tap needs to be in a location to confirm absence of bacteriological contamination and allow for clearance of new main for service. 3. Connection to the existing Sanitary manhole shall be coordinated with the City of Clearwater Public Utilities Department. 45. Betty Lane is a County numbered road (C.R. 355). Applicant shall obtain a right -of -way permit from Pinellas County prior to the commencement of any work activities within this right -of -way. 5. Applicant shall obtain a permit for the water main construction from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection. 6. Applicant shall obtain a permit for the sewer main construction from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection. 7. The City of Clearwater Engineering Department Details on sheets 9, 11 and 12 are dated. Please update with current details available on our website: www.myclearwater.com /gov /depts /pwa /engin /Production /stddet/index.asp 8. Extend storm pipe under entire front yards of Lots 48 - 51 to create an area where sidewalks can be installed. 9. Sidewalks are required along both sides of all public and private streets. (Community Development Code Sections 3 -1701 and 3 -1907 and Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards, Article 30). In addition, subdivision design shall, WHERE PRACTICAL, provide 19 -feet between back of sidewalk to garage doors to discourage parked vehicles from blocking sidewalks. Environmental Condition Sarah Josuns 03/23/2009 Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit: 562 -4897 Top of bank (TOB) at Pond 2 is shown in different locations on the current site survey and the proposed site plan. Verify the location of the TOB at Pond 2 and modify plans accordingly to accommodate the 15 foot vegetative buffer as required in Section 3 -907 of the Community Development Code. Pond may also be altered to meet this requirement. (See Stormwater conditions). Land Resource Condition Rick Albee 727 - 562 -4741 Not Met Not Met Print Date: 05/10/2009 CaseConditons Page 1 of 3 FLD2009 -03012 1888 N BETTY LN Land Resource Condition Rick Albee 727 - 562 -4741 03/23/2009 REASSESS the swales adjacent to trees to be preserved. The generic Type A and Type B lot Not Met grading details can not be applied to lots containing trees. Revise prior to Building Permit. 03/23/2009 Show the trees, with canopies, on the Utility Plan. RELOCATE all utilities directed at trees to be Not Met preserved prior to Building Permit. 03/23/2009 REVISE the pond T.O.B to save tree #39 prior to Building Permit. Not Met 03/23/2009 The Tree Preservation Plan, prepared by a certified arborist, must show how the proposed Not Met building, parking, sidewalks, driveways, stormwater and utilities impact the critical root zones (drip lines) of trees to be preserved and how you propose to address these impacts i.e.; crown elevating, root pruning and /or root aeration systems. Other data required on this plan must show the trees canopy line, actual tree barricade limits (2/3 of the drip line and /or in the root prune lines if required), and the tree barricade detail. And any other pertinent information relating to tree preservation. Also address impacts with the water and gas main removals. Provide prior to building permit. 03/23/2009 Show the canopies of all trees to remain on ALL plan sheets prior to Building Permit. Storm Water Condition Phuong Vo 562 -4752 Not Met 03/20/2009 The following shall be addressed prior to Community Development Board: (4/20/2009 - REVEIW Not Met OF RESUBMITTAL INDICATES THESE CONDITIONS HAVE NOT BEEN MET AND WILL THEREFORE BECOME CONDITIONS, OF.APPROVAL THAT SHALL BE MET IF THE CDB APPROVES THIS REQUEST) 1. Show that the proposed and existing ponds drain down in 24 hours or less. Current design shows the proposed ponds do not meet this requirement. 2. Soil analysis does not provide the seasonal high water table elevation. Proposed ponds shall have a minimum of 6" clearance between the pond bottom and seasonal high water level. 3. Please submit a revised drainage report per City of Clearwater Drainage Criteria. 4. Please clearly show the top of bank of the Springtime branch and the City of Clearwater drainage easement over this branch on the Paving and Grading Plan for proposed easements assessment. 5. Since the existing Pond 2 is being utilized for a portion of the proposed development, plan shall indicate that Pond 2 will be regraded, cleaned and resodded. The following shall be addressed prior to issuance of the Building Permit: 1. Provide additional topography on the adjacent property directly south of the lots 24, 25, 26, 27. Please show the finished floor elevation of the existing structure(s) within this area. 2. What is the survey vertical datum? Survey and Paving /Grading plan shall utilize the NAVD88 datum. Please indicate this information on the survey and the Paving /Grading for review. 3. Verify if type A is applied to lots 48, 49, 50, and 51. Proposed swale along lots 48, 49, 50, and 51 shall be replaced with a storm sewer with inlets system. Future fencing may be constructed between the lots by different homeowners which would block the drainage way. 4. The existing ditch in front of lots 48, 49, 50, and 51 appears to have been filled with dirt over time and currently does not have a positive flow path to properly drain runoff from these lots. In addition, the existing homes along the west side of the ditch have relatively low finished floor elevations. Show on the plan that roof gutters and downspouts will be directed toward the proposed rear swale. 5. Show a cross section of all the conflict points between the proposed /existing storm pipes and other utilities (i.e. existing storm pipe /inlet and proposed water pipe between lot 15 and 16, proposed storm pipe and existing sewer pipe in front of lot 14, existing sewer pipe and propose storm pipe between S -3 and S -4, etc.). Please revise the design as necessary to provide sufficient Print Date: 05/10/2009 Page 2 of 3 CaseConditons B - 44 FLD2009 -03012 1888 N BETTY LN Storm Water Condition Phuong Vo 562 -4752 clearance (vertical and horizontal) per Florida Administrative codes. 6. Please provide a 6" minimum clearance between the skimmer bottom (value C on the table of Sheet 7) and the pond bottom of control structure of Pond 3. 7. Private storm sewer system shall use manhole lids that read "Storm Sewer ", not index 203 as submitted plan shows. The same applies to the two existing curb inlet covers. 8. Please submit a copy of the approved SWFWMD ERP permit. 9. Please provide a private easement over the existing and proposed 24" outlet pipe of the existing private pond located directly south of the project for future maintenance. The proposed 24" appears to be too close to the proposed building edge. General note: 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. 2. At building permit application, applicant shall submit drainage report, soil report, and any other drainage related document for review and record. Solid Waste Condition Tom Glenn 562 -4930 03/17/2009 1. Recomend no on street parking Not Met 2. Please show where Black Barrels will be stored per code Traffic Eng Condition Bennett Elbo 562 -4775 03/18/2009 Show 20'x 20' sight visibility triangles at the private street intersections with Betty Lane. There Not Met shall be no objects in the sight triangle which does not meet the City's acceptable vertical height criteria at a level between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade. (City's Community Development Code, Section 3 -904) MET The above to be addressed prior to a Community Development Board (CDB) hearing. General Note(s): 1) Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and-fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727 - 562 -4504 03/25/2009 4/23/09 & 3/25/09 - WW Not Met Response to Residential Infill Project criteria #7 - The existing land use designation for the property of Residential Urban permits a maximum density of 7.5 dwelling units per acre, not the 15 du /acre indicated. Revise. 03/25/2009 4/23/09 - WW Not Met Include as a condition of approval: Based on the provisions of Section 3 -804.E and the prevailing lot pattern of the surrounding area, the maximum height of the fence proposed along the rear of Lots 10 -17 is three feet. Additionally, there will be gates required in the fence for Lots 10, 11, 16 and 17 to allow for the mowing of grass within the rights -of -way by the abutting lot owners. 3/25/09 - WW Along the west side (along the frontage of Pineland Drive) of Lots 10 -17 there is a note "proposed vinyl fence ". Unclear of what is proposed (solid or open fence; height of fence). Fence must meet the requirements of Section 3- 804.E, as these Lots 10 -17 are double frontage lots. Print Date: 05/10/2009 Page 3 of 3 CaseConditons 4 Wells, Wayne From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 11:54 AM To: Planning Subject: FW: Resubmittals for the May 19, 2009 CDB Meeting Importance: High FYI Thank you, Sherry Watkins Administrative Analyst Planning Department 727 -562 -4582 - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Keller, James Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 11:10 AM To: Watkins, Sherry Subject: FW: Resubmittals for the May 19, 2009 CDB Meeting Importance: High Ms. Watkins, I had to add a comment for the FLD2009 -02007 things to be addressed prior to building permit. Thanks again, Jim Keller - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Keller, James Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 10:53 AM To: Watkins, Sherry Subject: FW: Resubmittals for the May 19, 2009 CDB Meeting Importance: High Ms. Watkins, I am not sure if my e -mail went through so I am re- sending. Thank you for your help in this matter. Respectfully, James Keller Fire Inspector II Division of Fire Prevention Services Clearwater Fire & Rescue - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 10:44 AM To: Buzzell, William; Chase, Susan; Dougall- Sides, Leslie; DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Hollander, Gwen; Hufford, Diane; Josuns, Sarah; Keller, James; Lutz, Deb; Patni, Himanshu; Reid, Debbie; Rickard, Leonard; Shell, Heather C.; Steve Fairchild (E- mail); US Post Office (E-mail); Vo, Phuong; Yellin, Catherine Subject: Resubmittals for the May 19, 2009 CDB Meeting Importance: High DRC Members, Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the FLD2009 -03013 Holiday Inn Express 101 & 105 Coronado Drive - Planner Wayne Wells [Keller, James] .} Not met FLD2009 -02007 811 Cleveland Street, 804 Park Street Met / will also add PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT addressed:Fire Sprinkler /Exit requirements /cooking equip.requirements FLD2009 -03012 1888 Betty Lane Planner Wayne Wells [Keller, James] items to be Planner Wayne Wells [Keller, James] Met I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review (please do not take it, as we need it for the CDB mail out). Please review your comments /conditions for this case in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met" or still "not met," please affirm to me via email. Please have these cases reviewed, if possible by 12pm on Monday April 20, 2009. Thanks, Sherry Watkins Administrative Analyst Planning Department 727 -562 -4582 Wells, Wayne From: Doherty, Steve Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 9:06 AM To: Watkins, Sherry; Buzzell, William; Chase, Susan; Dougall- Sides, Leslie; DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Hollander, Gwen; Hufford, Diane; Josuns, Sarah; Keller, James; Lutz, Deb; Patni, Himanshu; Reid, Debbie; Rickard, Leonard; Shell, Heather C.; Steve Fairchild (E- mail); 'US Post Office (E- mail); Vo, Phuong; Yellin, Catherine Subject: RE: Resubmittals for the May 19, 2009 CDB Meeting I have reviewed the following cases for compliance with all Engineering Dept. requirements: FLD2009 -03013 Holiday Inn Express 101 & 105 Coronado Drive - Planner Wayne Wells All pre CDB conditions have been met FLD2009 -02007 811 Cleveland Street, 804 Park Street Planner Wayne Wells Stormwater pre CDB conditions not met - please make conditions of approval on Staff Recommendation to CDB FLD2009 -03012 1888 Betty Lane Planner Wayne Wells Stormwater pre CDB conditions not met - please make conditions of approval on Staff Recommendation to CDB Thanks Wayne for getting conditions into staff recommendations. -Steve Stephen L. Doherty Engineering Specialist l City of Clearwater Engineering steve.doherty@myclearwater.com 727.562.4773 - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 10:44 AM To: Buzzell, William; Chase, Susan; Dougall- Sides, Leslie; DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Hollander, Gwen; Hufford, Diane; Josuns, Sarah; Keller, James; Lutz, Deb; Patni, Himanshu; Reid, Debbie; Rickard, Leonard; Shell, Heather C.; Steve Fairchild (E- mail); US Post Office (E- mail); Vo, Phuong; Yellin, Catherine Subject: Resubmittals for the May 19, 2009 CDB Meeting Importance: High DRC Members, Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the FLD2009 -03013 Holiday Inn Express 101 & 105 Coronado Drive - Planner Wayne Wells FLD2009 -02007 811 Cleveland Street, 804 Park Street Planner Wayne Wells FLD2009 -03012 1888 Betty Lane Planner Wayne Wells I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review (please do not take it, as we need it for the CDB mail out). Please review your comments /conditions for this case in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met" or still "not met," please affirm to me via email. Please have these cases reviewed, if possible by 12pm on Monday April 20, 2009. Thanks, Sherry Watkins Administrative Analyst r Wells, Wayne From: Albee, Rick Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 10:37 AM To: Watkins, Sherry; Buzzell, William; Chase, Susan; Dougall- Sides, Leslie; DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Hollander, Gwen; Hufford, Diane; Josuns, Sarah; Keller, James; Lutz, Deb; Patni, Himanshu; Reid, Debbie; Rickard, Leonard; Shell, Heather C.; Steve Fairchild (E- mail); 'US Post Office (E- mail); Vo, Phuong; Yellin, Catherine Subject: RE: Resubmittals for the May 19, 2009 CDB Meeting Holiday Inn -No issues 811 Cleveland- No Issues 1888 Betty Lane - Revised conditions to be met at Building Permit. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 10:44 AM To: Buzzell, William; Chase, Susan; Dougall- Sides, Leslie; DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Hollander, Gwen; Hufford, Diane; Josuns, Sarah; Keller, James; Lutz, Deb; Patni, Himanshu; Reid, Debbie; Rickard, Leonard; Shell, Heather C.; Steve Fairchild (E- mail); US Post Office (E- mail); Vo, Phuong; Yellin, Catherine Subject: Resubmittals for the May 19, 2009 CDB Meeting Importance: High DRC Members, Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the FLD2009 -03013 Holiday Inn Express 101 & 105 Coronado Drive - Planner Wayne Wells FLD2009 -02007 811 Cleveland Street, 804 Park Street Planner Wayne Wells FLD2009 -03012 1888 Betty Lane Planner Wayne Wells I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review (please do not take it, as we need it for the CDB mail out). Please review your comments /conditions for this case. in Permit Plan and determine if the are met. :11:hether the condition "met" till "not ♦ n y � are n�ca or amain uva lilcy please affirm to me via email. Please have these cases reviewed, if possible by 12pm on Monday April 20, 2009. Thanks, Sherry Watkins Administrative Analyst Planning Department 727 -562 -4582 Wells, Wayne From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 1:37 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FW: Resubmittals for the May 19, 2009 CDB Meeting -- - -- Original Message---- - From: Reid, Debbie Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 12:32 PM To: Watkins, Sherry Subject: RE: Resubmittals for the May 19, 2009 CDB Meeting Pis see responses below. -- - -- Original Message---- - From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 10:44 AM To: Buzzell, William; Chase, Susan; Dougall- Sides, Leslie; DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Hollander, Gwen; Hufford, Diane; Josuns, Sarah; Keller, James; Lutz, Deb; Patni, Himanshu; Reid, Debbie; Rickard, Leonard; Shell, Heather C.; Steve Fairchild (E- mail); US Post Office (E- mail); Vo, Phuong; Yellin, Catherine Subject: Resubmittals for the May 19, 2009 CDB Meeting Importance: High DRC Members, Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the FLD2009 -03013 Holiday Inn Express 101 & 105 Coronado Drive - Planner Wayne Wells [Reid, Debbie] P&P impact fees due on this project. FLD2009 -02007 811 Cleveland Street, 804 Park Street Planner Wayne Wells [Reid, Debbie] No issues FLD2009 -03012 1888 Betty Lane Planner Wayne Wells [Reid, Debbie] No issues I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review (please do not take it, as we need it for the CDB mail out). Please review your comments /conditions for this case in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met" or still "not met," please affirm to me via email. Please have these cases reviewed, if possible by 12pm on Monday April 20, 2009. Thanks, Sherry Watkins Administrative Analyst Planning Department 727 - 562 -45 82 Wells, Wayne From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 10:44 AM To: Buzzell, William; Chase, Susan; Dougall- Sides, Leslie; DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Hollander, Gwen; Hufford, Diane; Josuns, Sarah; Keller, James; Lutz, Deb; Patni, Himanshu; Reid, Debbie; Rickard, Leonard; Shell, Heather C.; Steve Fairchild (E- mail); US Post Office (E- mail); Vo, Phuong; Yellin, Catherine Subject: Resubmittals for the May 19, 2009 CDB Meeting Importance: High DRC Members, Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the FLD2009 -03013 Holiday Inn Express 101 & 105 Coronado Drive. - Planner Wayne Wells FLD2009 -02007 811 Cleveland Street, 804 Park Street Planner Wayne Wells FLD2009- 030121888 Betty Lane Planner Wayne Wells I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review (please do not take it, as we need it for the CDB mail out). Please review your comments /conditions for this case in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met" or still "not met," please affirm to me via email. Please have these cases reviewed, if possible by 12pm on Monday April 20, 2009. Thanks, Sherry Watkins Administrative Analyst Planning Department 727 -562 -4582 Wells, Wayne From: Fresk, Sheryl Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 1:57 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Map Request for FLD2009 -03012 and PLT2009- 00001, 1888 N. Betty Lane AERIAL.doc EXISTING.doc LOCATION.do ZONING.doc - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 7:01 PM To: Fresk, Sheryl Cc: Herman, Jason; Watkins, Sherry Subject: Map Request for FLD2009-03012 and PLT2009- 00001, 1888 N. Betty Lane Sheryl - Attached is a map request for Cases FLD2009 -03012 and PLT2009 -00001 for the property at 1888 N. Betty Lane. I will bring over the paperwork. The survey you may keep. Wayne M. Wells, A1CP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 -5520 Phone: 727 - 562 -4504 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 << File: Map Request Form.doc >> Map Request Planner Name: Wayne Wells Case Number: FLD2009- 03012/PLT2009 -00001 Date Requested: March 30, 2009 Date Requested for (date): April 13, 2009 Maps Requested ® Location Map ® Aerial Map ® Zoning Map ® Existing Surrounding Uses Map Required Documents to be submitted to Engineering ® Legal Description A3 070290 e� ® Survey / ® Map with Proposed Site Highlighted IN ADDITION TO THE REQUESTED MAPS, PLEASE PROVIDE VERIFICATION THAT THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION WE HAVE PROVIDED IS CORRETDjjY RA E. Thomas Mahony, Geographic Technology Manager 6 gnat re fV Map Name Owner: Habitat for Humanity of Pinellas County Cases: FLD2009 -03012 PLT2009 -00001 Site: 1888 N. Betty Lane Property Size: 8.89 acres PIN: 03- 29 -15- 00000 - 420 -0140 Atlas Page: 260B Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 7:01 PM To: Fresk, Sheryl Cc: Herman, Jason; Watkins, Sherry Subject: Map Request for FLD2009 -03012 and PLT2009- 00001, 1888 N. Betty Lane Sheryl - Attached is a map request for Cases FLD2009 -03012 and PLT2009 -00001 for the property at 1888 N. Betty Lane. I will bring over the paperwork. The survey you may keep. Wayne M. Wells, AICP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 -5520 Phone: 727 - 562 -4504 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 M� Map Request Form.doc Map Request Planner Name: Wayne Wells Case Number: FLD2009- 03012/PLT2009 -00001 Date Requested: March 30, 2009 Date Requested for (date): April 13, 2009 Maps Requested ® Location Map ® Aerial Map ® Zoning Map ® Existing Surrounding Uses Map Required Documents to be submitted to Engineering ® Legal Description ® Survey ® Map with Proposed Site Highlighted IN ADDITION TO THE REQUESTED MAPS, PLEASE PROVIDE VERIFICATION THAT THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION WE HAVE PROVIDED IS CORRECT AND ACCURATE. Thomas Mahony, Geographic Technology Manager Signature Map Name Owner: Habitat for Humanity of Pinellas County Cases: FLD2009 -03012 PLT2009 -00001 Site: 1888 N. Betty Lane Property Size: 8.89 acres PIN: 03- 29 -15- 00000 - 420 -0140 Atlas Page: 2608 �L�Z.�G�• 030 /t��"�Zo�7- DOODI 111 �I L- YR 8� M Milli"' 111111 le ®is KEM tam Rol NSA I I. OV— — 1 1 • Now F&-qv— qqiwmw� maw a� 1 1888 N. B 4., Lc eee�I���ealeleer♦M�E�Y9�ta� t9�ti5ti�tti���i Mail ®fie lIloll ®INEIe ® IL dearwater U Prepared ey: Bngf —ring Dpattn urd Oeoyrephic Technology Dlgabn 100 1 Myrtle Ave, Cleannter FL 9!756 Ph: (727)5024750, P.: (727 )5394755 w- w- myclefrwM.—rin O(itYYnx Elp WmnNlvrtlde kRtTMSnetlgne Cf'dCSewefN ErpMeNDOgwlmen, fromutoe eotepeO SH Uetl q sro IecpYn wm ve ��eeoYroro Inx Iro wl. �ec.neo nnemftaarbTrcPMPUSf atle+ecam0eveme nn,dMe fxemoy. He tucrt Iro uvaerewNNmelRt fmfnY{ fepetW NtnPIN( mvxerWg Irc atlrery, (1LHI/ANt, mMddry, mtutedRYbmf Nff IbeIN nlnlPflltulelun. FWnerma� IM UNbfiYfM'MN n0lfdfywl WmNN.tpclMeOwlln!/le We N Mtute b tu:n tlYe. M 1 Inch equals 200 feet WE 200 100 0 20 s Feet Legend 4 City Owned Property Agreement to Annex •uDtE SU B NUMB ER ('• R Star to Plat) OBLOCK NUMBER ^�, O SUB PARCEL NUMBER D aeT PARCEL NUMBER(M &B) LAND HOOK (COMMON OWNERSHIP / PLATTED SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY COUNTY HIGHWAY Q STATE HIGHWAY ' U.S. HIGHWAY Outside City of Clearwater ___ RESIOEHTULOISTRICTS lDR -LOx Damp ReMemtlel MDR -M fWm Denflty R.I -IMtI MHDR - Mtutle H19h D.r,Iy Reritler I NOR - Hwn Otrolry Refbentlal MHP •MRblem m[Perk C RNCOD -CPrc hn to Rldle Nelpletlmm0 C.,.,.. ,,n oomn IENCDD •It1eIE Ft14,NeIpnlPeWm CPruevelon Omllfy DYmtl SPECUL VSE DISTRICTS COMMERC- DISTRICTS IRT . Idol• 11. R—...m T.—be 0 -Dlife I - Infltllnmtl T -T—,. OSdi - OPm SpnediNnttlmfl C- CtmmcrtYl - PmteNttlon— 0- 0wnewn Zoning Atlas May 04, 2007 SE 114 of 3 -29.15 ! A 1:00 pA11 Case Number: FLD2009- 03t,_.. -- 1888 N BETTY LN Owner(s): Habitat For Humanity Of Pinellas Co 3071 118th Avenue North •� St. Petersburg, F133716 V9MCW TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: 727 - 209 -2191, E -MAIL: No Email Representative: Ronald E Spoor CMV4A 3071 118th Avenue North St Petersburg, F133716 TELEPHONE: 727 -536- 4755 x218, FAX: 727 - 209 -2191, E -MAIL: land @phfh.org Location: 8.89 acres located on the south side of Sunset Point Road between N. Betty Lane and Pineland Drive Atlas Page: 260B Zoning District: MDR, Medium Density Residential Request: Flexible Development approval to permit a 51 -lot subdivision for detached dwellings with a minimum lot area of 4,019 square feet, a minimum lot width of 40.9 feet (measured at the front setback line) and a reduction to the front setback requirement from 25 to 19 feet, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Section 2 -304.G (related to PLT2009- 00001). Proposed Use: Detached dwelling Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Attendees Included: City: Wayne Wells, Robert Tefft, Steve Doherty, Scott Rice, Rick Albee, Jim Keller Applicant: Ronald Spoor, P.J. Shah The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, April 2, 2009 - Page 16 DRC Action Agamda 1.1 Prior to review by Community Development Board: 1. Sidewalks are required along both sides of all public and private streets. (Community Development Code Sections 3 -1701 and 3 -1907 and Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards, Article 30). In addition, subdivision design shall allow a minimum of 19 -feet between back of sidewalk to garage doors to discourage parked vehicles from blocking sidewalks. 2. The plan submitted indicates that the water main on Pineland is proposed to be capped. This will leave a dead -end line in place of a looped system. This will present a water quality problem for the City of Clearwater and existing service customers on Pineland. Can this line be reconnected along a parcel line not passing under a retention pond so as to maintain the loop and allow for the proposed construction? 3. Agree to provide an additional 10 -foot drainage easement along the existing 7.5 -foot easement lying along the north property line of proposed Lot 48 to provide for maintance of proposed 24 -inch storm pipe. Prior to the issuance of a building permit: 1. Show on the water and sewer plan the location of chlorination and sample points for the new water main. 2. Sample tap needs to be in a location to confirm absence of bacteriological contamination and allow for clearance of new main for service. 3. Connection to the existing Sanitary manhole shall be coordinated with the City of Clearwater Public Utilities Department. 4. Sanitary Sewer will be privately owned and maintained within a private road. For this reason sanitary manhole covers shall not have the words "City of Clearwater" on them. 5. Betty Lane is a County numbered road (C.R. 355). Applicant shall obtain a right -of -way permit from Pinellas County prior to the commencement of any work activities within this right -of -way. 6. Applicant shall obtain a permit for the water main construction from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection. 7. Applicant shall obtain a permit for the sewer main construction from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection. 8. The City of Clearwater Engineering Department Details on sheets 9, 11 and 12 are dated. Please update with current details available on our website: www. myclearwater. com/ gov/ depts/ pwa /engin/Production/stddet/index. asp 9. Extend storm pipe under entire front yards of Lots 48 - 51 to create an area where sidewalks can be installed. Environmental: 1 . Top of bank JOB) at Pond 2 is shown in different locations on the current site survey and the proposed site plan. Verify the location of the TOB at Pond 2 and modify plans accordingly to accommodate the 15 foot vegetative buffer as required in Section 3 -907 of the Community Development Code. Fire: 1 , The width of the road is shown as 28'. As such street parking will only be allowed on one side which will be the side of the road with out fire hydrants. "NO PARKING FIRE LANE" signs will have to be posted every 60' on the hydrant side of the road. Please show details and locations on page 3 PRIOR TO CDB 2. PROVIDE clarity on sheet 10 to identify on Pineland Drive location of fire hydrant assembly for Units 48/49/50/51 Harbor Master: 1 . No issues. Legal: 1 . No issues. Land Resources: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, April 2, 2009 - Page 17 DRC Action Agmda 1.1 I . Revise the pond .....B to save tree #39 prior to CDB. 2. Show the trees, with canopies, on the Utility Plan. Relocate all utilities directed at trees to be preserved prior to CDB. 3. Show the canopies of all trees to remain on all plan sheets prior to CDB. 4. Reassess the swales adjacent to trees to be preserved. The generic Type A and Type B lot grading details can not be applied to lots containing trees. Revise prior to Building Permit. 5. The Tree Preservation Plan, prepared by a certified arborist, must show how the proposed building, parking, sidewalks, driveways, stormwater and utilities impact the critical root zones (drip lines) of trees to be preserved and how you propose to address these impacts i.e.; crown elevating, root pruning and/or root aeration systems. Other data required on this plan must show the trees canopy line, actual tree barricade limits (2/3 of the drip line and/or in the root prune lines if required), and the tree barricade detail. And any other pertinent information relating to tree preservation. Also address impacts with the water and gas main removals. Provide prior to building permit. Landscaping: 1 . No issues. See Zoning comments. Parks and Recreation: 1 . No issues on this project. Demo of 61 residential units, replaced with 51 single family homes. Stormwater: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, April 2, 2009 - Page 18 DRC Action Agmda 1.1 I . The following shu__ ,e addressed prior to Community Development Loard: 1. Show that the proposed and existing ponds drain down in 24 hours or less. Current design shows the proposed ponds do not meet this requirement, and there is no document submitted supporting the existing pond (Pond 2) draw down time. 2. Soil analysis does not provide the seasonal high water table elevation. Proposed ponds shall have a minimum of 6" clearance between the pond bottom and seasonal high water level. 3. Time of concentration shall be 60 minutes, not 15 minutes as current design shows. Please note that a minimum time of concentration of 15 minutes stated in the City Stormwater Criteria is applied for storm sewer system and inlets design, not applied for the pond design. 4. Required '' /z inches of water quality for the entire site of 8.89 acres equals 16,169 cubic feet. The two proposed ponds provide a total capacity of 12,542 cubic feet of water quality. Please demonstrate that the existing Pond 2 provides the remainder of the required water quality volume, which is 3627 cubic feet. Provide pond 2's stage storage table along with the designed elevations. 5. Please submit a revised drainage report showing all of the required changes to address the conditions 1 - 4 above. 6. Please clearly show the top of bank of the Springtime branch and the City of Clearwater drainage easement over this branch on the Paving and Grading Plan for proposed easements assessment. 7. The location of the top of bank of the existing Pond 2 shown on the survey does not appear to conform with either the preliminary plat or the plan set. Viewing the submitted survey together with field observations support a conclusion that the proposed house on Lot 3 will be constructed partially over the top of bank. Please revise the plan set and the size of the proposed building accordingly. 8. Since the existing Pond 2 is being utilized for a portion of the proposed development, plan shall indicate that Pond 2 will be regraded, cleaned, resodded, and restored to a working condition. The following shall be addressed prior to issuance of the Building Permit: 1. Provide additional topography on the adjacent property directly south of the lots 23, 24, 25, 26, 27. Please show the finished floor elevation of the existing structure(s) within this area. 2. Please provide an appropriately designed side swale on each side of each lot and show proposed grades and drainage arrows indicating each individual lot can drain to the streets or the pond on its own. 3. What is the survey vertical datum? Survey and Paving/Grading plan shall utilize the NAVD88 datum. Please indicate this information on the survey and the Paving/Grading for review. 4. Verify if type A is applied to lots 48, 49, 50, and 51. Proposed swale along lots 48, 49, 50, and 51 shall be replaced with a storm sewer with inlets system. Future fencing may be constructed between the lots by different homeowners which would block the drainage way. 5. The existing ditch in front of lots 48, 49, 50, and 51 appears to have been filled with dirt over time and currently does not have a positive flow path to properly drain runoff from these lots. In addition, the existing homes along the west side of the ditch have relatively low finished floor elevations. Show on the plan that roof gutters and downspouts will be piped directly to the proposed storm sewer pipes along the back of these lots. 6. Show a cross section of all the conflict points between the proposed/existing storm pipes and other utilities (i.e. existing storm pipe /inlet and proposed water pipe between lot 15 and 16, proposed storm pipe and existing sewer pipe in front of lot 14, existing sewer pipe and propose storm pipe between S -3 and S -4, etc.). Please revise the design as necessary to provide sufficient clearance (vertical and horizontal) per Florida Administrative codes. 7. Please provide a 6" minimum clearance between the skimmer bottom (value C on the table of Sheet 7) and the pond bottom of control structure of Pond 3. 8. Private storm sewer system shall use manhole lids that read "Private Storm Sewer ", not index 203 as submitted plan shows. The same applies to the two existing curb inlet covers. 9. Please submit a copy of the approved SWFWMD ERP permit. 10. Please provide a private easement over the existing and proposed 24" outlet pipe of the existing private pond located directly south of the project for future maintenance. The proposed Development Review Agenda - Thursday, April 2, 2009 - Page 19 DRC Aaiun Ag.da 1.1 24" appears to be __., close to the proposed building edge. General note: 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. 2. At building permit application, applicant shall submit drainage report, soil report, and any other drainage related document for review and record. Solid Waste: 1 . 1. Recomend no on street parking> 2. Please show where Black Barrels will be stored per code Traffic Engineering: 1 . Show 20'x 20' sight visibility triangles at the private street intersections with Betty Lane. There shall be no objects in the sight triangle which does not meet the City's acceptable vertical height criteria at a level between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade. (City's Community Development Code, Section 3 -904) Planning: The above to be addressed prior to a Community Development Board (CDB) hearing. General Note(s): 1) Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, April 2, 2009 - Page 20 DRC Action Agmda I.I I . Sheet 3 - Need to i.__.cate the width of, and the purpose of, the propo..,d easements along the fronts of lots along Stevens Creek Drive. 2. Sheet 3 - Revise front dimension for Lot 48 to 62.5 feet (not 43.3 feet). 3 . Support General Engineering comment requiring sidewalks on both sides of the private street. This is a Habitat subdivision, where families with children are expected. Having a sidewalk on both sides of the street is a necessary safety feature. Also support their comment regarding the distance from the back edge of the sidewalk to the garage door. Need to show both (sidewalk and distance from the back edge of the sidewalk to the garage door) on Sheet 3. 4. Response to Residential Infill Project criteria #7 - The existing land use designation for the property of Residential Urban permits a maximum density of 7.5 dwelling units per acre, not the 15 du/acre indicated. Revise. 5 . The application requests a lot width of 40.9 feet. Lot width is measured at the front setback line, per our Code definition. Sheet 3 needs to show on each lot with a frontage of less than 40.9 feet where such lot width is being measured, with appropriate dimensions to indicate such lot width and proposed setbacks. 6. Sheet 3 - Need to indicate what the dashed lines are for on Lots 22 and 23 (apparently a tree preservation easement) and need to indicate the width of such on each lot (since they are a different width on each lot). 7. Sheet 3 - Proposed 10 -foot easement on Lots 17 and 18 - Is this split equally on each lot (five feet on each lot)? If so, dimension such on each lot. 8. Sheet 3 - Based on the drainage flow indicated on Sheet 6, shouldn't there be a drainage easement at the rear of Lot 18, possibly as an extension of the diagonal proposed drainage easement line at the rear of Lot 17? 9. Unclear of the purpose of Tract B and whom will own/maintain it. 10. Sheet 13 - Landscaping Notes #1 - Unclear if you are meaning "one 2" caliper shade trees" or "two (2) 2.5" caliper shade trees" per lot. I think the latter ( ?). 11 . From a maintenance of property standpoint, how will the owners of Lots 12 -15 maintain (cut the grass) on the west side of Pond 1? It would seem a better design to reorient the rear property lines for Lots 12 -15 to the center of Pond 1 and have Lots 11 and 16 wrap around the rears of Lots 12 -15 to maybe the common lot line between Lots 12 and 13 so that the owners of Lots 11 and 16 will have to mow the grass on the west side of Pond 1. 12. Unclear why a 15 -foot wide wetland buffer is proposed over the rear of Lots 2 -5, when it appears that the full 25 -foot wide buffer can be provided, which also appears to be within the existing 50 -foot wide drainage and utility easement ( ?). Unclear why there is a wetland buffer deficit area over Lots 3 -5 ( ?) (Sheet 5). The wetland buffer compensation area on Lots 7 -8 is outside of the existing 50 -foot wide drainage and utility easement and no additional easement is proposed ( ?). 13 . The plat indicates an easement across the west side of Lots 28 and 29 that is not indicated on Sheet 3. If there is to be an easement on these lots, need to show on Sheet 3 and dimension it's width. 14. Sheet 3 - Site Data - a. Remove the line of "between structures" under Setbacks, as it has no meaning; b. This application is being processed as a Residential Infill Project in the MDR District, where there is no minimum lot area requirements. So, under the Required/Allowed column, need to revise to "N /A ". Under the Proposed column, need to change "3000' min." to "4019 sf min. "; c. Same as "b" above, there is no minimum lot width under a Residential Infill Project. Under the Required/Allowed column, need to revise to "N /A ". Under the Proposed column, need to change to 40.9 feet (at front setback line) "; d. Under "Living Units ", revise "Required/Allowed" to 66 units (not 133 units); e. Under "Density", revise "Required/Allowed" to 7.5 (not 15). The land use designation for the property is RU, which allows a maximum of 7.5 du/acre; f. Under "Setbacks" for "Front ", need to address under the Proposed column what is proposed for corner lots. Also, change the Required/Allowed to "10 -25 "'; g. Under "Setbacks" for "Rear ", change the Required/Allowed to "0 -10' it h. Under "Height ", change the Required/Allowed to "30-50'"; and i. Remove the footnote " *Flexible Standard Development ". 15. Lots 1, 27, 28, 34, 41 and 42 are comer lots, where structures are required to meet front setbacks along the street frontages and side setbacks otherwise. Unclear of what setback is proposed for these corner lots and if you are requesting any reductions. Clarify. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, April 2, 2009 - Page 21 DRC Aaim Agwda 1.1 16 . Along the west sid, gong the frontage of Pineland Drive) of Lots 1 � , there is a note "proposed vinyl fence ". Unclear of what is proposed (solid or open fence; height of fence). Fence must meet the requirements of Section 3- 804.E, as these Lots 10 -17 are double frontage lots. 17. Two typical floor plans of dwellings have been provided. Based on the information indicated on Sheet 6, it appears that dwellings may be located to the farthest rear part of the lot, but located adjacent to existing or proposed easements (Lots 20 -27 and 29 -33). The two -story dwelling floor plans indicate a rear doorway, which by Building Code will require a stoop /landing equal to the size of the door outside this rear door. Such stoop /landing and any desired patios are considered structures that must meet required setbacks and need to be outside of any easements. This information is being provided, while the actual dwellings are not proposed at this time, to understand how such structure locations will affect the dwelling location design on the lot. 18. Lot 1 - The north/south distance from the front property line to the proposed drainage easement is approximately 84 feet. Meeting required setbacks, will there be sufficent depth to accommodate a dwelling. 19. Proposed drainage and utility easement on Lots 29 -35 - Stated as 20 feet wide, but: a. it does not appear of equal width on Lots 32 -34 versus Lot 35. Dimension the widths on each lot; and b. the easement on Lots 29 -31 is not 20 feet in width. Need to dimension the width at the rear of these lots. 20. Sheet 3 - Lot 15 - Unclear of east/west dashed line on south side of the lot (easement). Such dashed line is not shown on the preliminary plat. 21 . Proposed Tot Lot - This is not a developable lot. Should this be identified as Tract C? Whom is to own/maintain this? 22. Sheets 3, 4, 5, 6 and 10 - The easternmost arrow for the eastern note "EX. 50' DRNG & UTIL. ESM'T (OR 6531, PG 2350)" is drawn not to the easement line but to the top of bank line. Revise. 23 . Sheet 6 - Lots 3 -7 - The existing top of bank is located within the footprints of the proposed dwellings and it is unclear what is proposed regarding regrading of these lot to remove the dwellings from the top of bank of the creek and the effect of such regrading in respect to existing trees to be preserved. 24 Sheet 6 - There are hexagons within each dwelling footprint with an A or B above asnumber. Unclear what this hexagon symbolizes, since it is not included in the legend. Revise. 25. All on -site electric and communication lines must be placed underground for the entire subdivision. Other: No Comments Notes: Sufficient - To be placed on the 5/19/09 CDB agenda, submit 15 collated copies of the revised plans & application material addressing all above departments' comments by noon, 4/13/09. Packets shall be collated, folded and stapled as appropriate. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, April 2, 2009 - Page 22 DRC Action Agmda 1.1 Property Appraiser General Information: 03/29/15/00000/420 /0140 Card 1 r Interactive Map of thus Comparable Sales Back to Quea New Tax Collector parcel Lrsrin19 Kesults Jearch information 03/29/15/00000/420 /0140 Building 2of Building 1 17 Data Current as of March 04, 2009 [ 1:43 pra Wednesday March 4] Nonresidential Property Owner, Address, and Sales Print Offices Prope Use: 413 FROM NE COR OF NW 1/4 OF SE 1/4 TH S 50FT TH W 30 FT TO SW COR OF INTER OF SUNSET POINT AND BETTY LANE FOR POB TH S 698.09 FT TH W 504.62FT TH S 220 FT TH W I OOFT TH N 776.10 FT TO CENTER LINE OF SPRINGTIME BRANCH TH NE'LY ALONG CENTER LINE OF SPRINGTIME BRANCH 476FT(S) TO A POINT 147.49FT W OF POB TH E 147.49FT TO POB CONT 9AAC(C) ** Click here for short legal ** Page 1 of 4 Question/Comment about this 2008 Exemptions Homestead: No Use: 0% Ownership: 0% Tax Exempt: 0% Government: Yes Institutional: No Agricultural: $0 Historic: $0 2008 Value 2008 Tax Information Comparable Sales Value:: $0 Tax District: CW Building Value per F.S. Millage: 20.3578 553.844 Just/Market Value: $4,333,600 Non Ad Valorem Assessments: $.00 Assessed Value/ SOH Cap_$4,333,600 Taxes: $.00 History Taxable Value: $0 Taxes without Save -Our -Homes cap: $.00 A significant taxable value increase may Taxes without any exemptions: $88,222.60 occur when sold. Click here for details. Owner/Mailing Address HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF PINELLAS COUNTY INC 3071 118TH AVE N ST PETERSBURG FL 33716 -1800 Property Address 1888 BETTY LN Parcel Information Book/Page: Land Use: Municipal, 16167/2644 other tha... (89) Census Tract: 263.00 Sale Date Book/Page Price QX V/I 2/2008 16167/2644 $1,189,400 U I Plat Year Plat Book/Page(s) Not Platted http: / /www.pcpao.org/gencral _ nadet.php ?pn= 1529030000042001401 3/4/2009 Property Appraiser General Information: 03/29/15/00000/420 /0140 Card 1 Page 2 of 4 Land Information Seawall: Frontage: None View: Land Use Land Size Unit Value Units Method Municipal, other than parks, recreational areas, ...(89) 698 x 604 175,000.00 9.40 A Structural Elements Foundation: Continuous Footing Floor System: Slab on Grade Exterior Wall: Concrete Block/Stucco Roof Frame: Gable & Hip Roof Cover: Composition Shingle Height Factor: 0 Floor Finish: Asphalt Tile Interior Finish: Drywall Party wall: None Structural Frame: None Cabinet & Mill:. Average No Building Drawing for this card Quality: Average Heating & Air: Heating & cooling Package Electric: Average Bath Tile:. None Fixtures: 2 Total Units: 0 Year Built: 1982 Effective Age: 15 Other Depreciation: 0 Functional Depreciation: 0 Economic. Depreciation: 0 http: / /www.pcpao.org/general _ nadet.php ?pn= 1529030000042001401 3/4/2009 Property Appraiser General Information: 03/29/15/00000/420 /0140 Card 1 Page 3 of 4 Sub Area information Description . Building Finished Ft2 Gross Area Ft2 Factor Effective Ft2 Base Area 1,266 1,266 1.00 1,266 Open Porch Finished 25 .30 8 Total Building Finished SF: 1,266 Total Gross SF: 1,291 Total Effective SF: 1,274 Nonresidential Extra Features Description Dimensions Value/Unit Units Total NewValue Depreciated Value Year Patio/Deck 10X16 $6.00 160 $960.00 $380.00 1982 Asphalt 18600 $1.75 18600 $32,550.00 $32,550.00 Unknown http:// www. pcpao.org/general_nadet.php ?pn= 1529030000042001401 3/4/2009 Welcome to VDB on the Web •3TMiTi' w f Pan Tool Zoom Tool wwgoa.toa; dentHy T Aerial Photography: 12007 Color Transparency (0.0- n� ! I.U) Theme Description This is the default set. It has no data layers, just linework. All of the map layers are black. http: / /vdb.pcpao.org/vdb.php ! �E .rt,E'i i Nil; EA Ann Oral Page 1 of 1 AN •� # r., - 70Y Uw ° ie �s.s'• j } f 3/4/2009 " 3/4/2009 f 'alt! i r: CITY OF CLEARWATER 4s POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758 -4748 MUNICIPAL SERvICFS BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MrRTLEAvENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562 -4567 FAx (727) 562 -4865 PLANNING DEPARTMENT May 20, 2009 Ronald Spoor, Land Development Manager Habitat for Humanity of Pinellas County 3071 118"' Avenue North St. Petersburg, FL 33716 RE: Development Order — Case Nos. FLD2009- 03012/PLT2009 -00001 1888 N. Betty Lane Dear Mr. Spoor: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4- 206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On May 19, 2009, the Community Development Board reviewed your request for (1) Flexible Development approval to permit a 51 -lot subdivision for detached dwellings in the Medium Density Residential (MDR) District with a minimum lot area of 4,019 square feet, a minimum lot width of 40.9 feet (measured at the front setback line) and a reduction to the front setback requirement from 25 to 19 feet (to building), as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 304.G; and (2) Preliminary Plat approval for a 51 -lot subdivision for detached dwellings. The Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Conditions of Approval: Findings of Fact: 1. The 8.89 acres is located on the south side of Sunset Point Road between N. Betty Lane and Pineland Drive; 2. The property was previously developed with a 61 -unit attached dwelling complex (Homer Villas), which was demolished in July 2008; 3. The surrounding area is primarily developed with detached dwellings, although an attached dwelling complex is located to the south and a public school is located to the east of the subject property; 4. The applicant, Habitat for Humanity of Pinellas County, proposes to redevelop the subject property with a 51 -lot subdivision for detached dwellings providing affordable housing for families; 5. The applicant is proposing to utilize the existing infrastructure, including the streets, water mains and sanitary sewer lines, where such location of this infrastructure requires flexibility with minimum lot area, minimum lot width and minimum front setback standards; 6. The proposed Stevens Creek Drive will be a private street 28 feet in width and will be maintained by a homeowners association; 7. A tot lot (Tract B) is proposed as an amenity to this subdivision, located between Lots 41 and 42, and will be maintained by a homeowners association; 8. The proposal includes a minimum lot area of 4,019 square feet and a minimum lot width (measured at the front setback line) of 40.9 feet; �•r 0 May 20, 2009 Spoor — Page 2 9. The proposal includes a reduction to the front setback from 25 to 19 feet, but additional front setback will be provided to the garage door to preclude a vehicle parked in the driveway from overhanging the public sidewalk; 10. The Preliminary Plat for this subdivision complies with the design standards of the Community Development Code. A Final Plat will be required to be approved and accepted by City Council prior to recording in the public records; and 11. There is no outstanding Code Enforcement issue associated with the subject property. Conclusions of Law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Tables 2 -301.1 and 2 -304 of the Community Development Code; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2 -304.G of the Community Development Code; 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Section 3 -913 of the Community Development Code; and 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the requirements for Preliminary Plats in Sections 4 -704, 4 -705 and 4 -709 of the Community Development Code. Conditions of Approval: 1. That the following minimum setbacks apply to this subdivision: a. front: 19 feet to porches and additional setback be provided to the garage doors to preclude vehicles parked in driveways from overhanging the public sidewalks; b. side: five feet; c. rear: 10 feet; 2. That the maximum buildine height be 30 feet: 3. That black barrels stored exterior to the dwelling and outdoor mechanical equipment be screened from view from adjacent streets and properties; 4. That, based on the provisions of Section 3 -804.E and the prevailing lot pattern of the surrounding area, the maximum height of the fence proposed along the rear of Lots 10 -17 be three feet. Additionally, gates must be installed in the fence for Lots 10, 11, 16 and 17 to allow for the mowing of grass within the rights -of -way by the abutting lot owners; 5. That sidewalks be provided on both sides of Stevens Creek Drive; and 6. That, prior to the issuance of a building permit to construct the subdivision improvements, plans be revised to comply with all requirements of General Engineering, Environmental Engineering, Stormwater Engineering, Traffic Engineering and the Land Resource Specialist. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (May. 19, 2010). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the initial building permit. The building permit must be obtained within six months of the initial permit application. This timeframe to obtain the initial building permit may be extended for an additional six months for cause by the Community Development Coordinator. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for the Flexible Development approval for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. May 20, 2009 Spoor — Page 3 The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4 -502.13 by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on June 2, 2009 (14 days from the date of the CDB meeting). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate. to call Wayne M. Wells, Planner III, at 727 -562 -4504. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.mycleanvate.r.com/ og v /depts /planning. Sincerely, r i el e , Planning Director S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BWLEX (FLD)tlnactive or Finished ApplicationslBetty N 1888 Stevens Creek Subdivision (MDR) 2009.05 - Approved - WWIBetty N 1888 Development Order 5.20.09.doc .< CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday, May 19, 2009, beginning at 1:00 PM, in the City Council Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Ave, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests: NOTE: All persons wishing to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meeting. Those cases that are not contested by the applicant, staff, neighboring property owners, etc. will be placed on a consent agenda and approved by a single vote at the beginning of the meeting. 1. City of Clearwater is requesting Flexible Development approval to permit Utility /Infrastructure uses in the Open/ Space Recreation (OS /R) District, the Industrial Research and Technology (IRT) District and the Institutional (1) District as Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Projects under the provisions of Community Development Code (CDC) Sections 2- 1404.A, 2- 1304.0 and 2- 1204.A.. (Proposed Use: Utility /Infrastructure [Water Production Wells]) at — (1) 1740 Weston Dr.; (2) 1571 Cleveland St.; (3) 2634 Sabal Springs Dr.; (4) 1840 Airport Dr.; (5) 1475 N. Hibiscus St.; (6) 1700 Belcher Rd.; (7) 1709 Keene Rd.; (8) 3024 Eastland Blvd.; (9) 2784 Enterprise Rd. E.; (10) 2775 State Road 580; (11) 2698 Fifth Ave. N.; (12) 1515 Cleveland St.; (13) 2630 Sabal Springs Dr.; and (14) 600 S. Evergreen Ave., (1) 02- 29 -15, M &B 33.02, (2 & 12) 14- 29 -15, M &B 21.01, (3) 29- 28 -16, M &B 22.04, (4) 12- 29 -15, M &B 32.01, (5) Palm Terrace Unit 1 Public Park, (6) Clearwater Industrial Park Lot 13 Less S 30ft for St and Less Rd on East, (7) Pinellas Groves SW 1/4 , S %2 of Lots 25 & 26 Less Rd on W and Pinellas Groves NW '/4, N 283.13 of W 33.3 ft of Lot 6 & N 283.13 ft of Lots 7 & 8 Less Rd R/W on W,(8) 28- 28 -16, M &B 33.07, (9 & 10) 29- 28 -16, M &B 31.01, (11) 32- 28 -16, M &B 21.05, (13) 29- 28 -16, M &B 22.04, & (14) 15- 29 -15, M &B 41.01. Assigned Planner: A. Scott Kurleman, Planner III. FLD2009 -04015 2. Habitat for Humanity of Pinellas County is requesting Flexible Development approval to permit a 51 -lot subdivision for detached dwellings in the Medium Density Residential (MDR) District with a minimum lot area of 4,019 sq. ft., a minimum lot width of 40.9 feet (measured at the front setback line) and a reduction to the front setback requirement from 25 to 19 ft. (to building), as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Sec. 2- 304.G; and Preliminary Plat approval for a 51 -lot subdivision for detached dwellings. (Proposed Use: 51 -lot subdivision for detached dwellings) at 1888 N. Betty Ln. That portion of the west' /2 of the Southeast' /4 of Section 3, Township 29 South, Range 15 E in Pinellas . County, Florida. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner 111. FLD2009 -03012 PLT�2009= 00001 3. Rule LLP. is requesting Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed use of 9,728 square feet of restaurants, 3,464 sq. ft. of retail sales and services, one dwelling unit and 655 sq. ft. of nonconforming vehicle sales (rental) /display floor area in the Downtown (D) District with building heights ranging from 15 to 24 ft. and 30 parking spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec. 2- 903.C. (Proposed Use: Restaurants, retail sales and services, auto rental and one dwelling unit) at 801 and 811 Cleveland St., 23 S Myrtle Ave, 802 &804 Park St., Lots 1- 3, Block 1, Less road right -of -way and lots 14 -16, Blk. 1, Magnolia Park. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2009 -02007 4. Decade Companies Income Properties is requesting Flexible Development approval to permit a 108 -room overnight accommodation use in the Tourist (T) District with a reduction to lot width along Devon Dr. /First St. from 150 to 100 ft. (north side) and from 150 to 110 ft. (south side), a reduction to the front (west) setback from 15 to 5 ft. (to proposed building) (north side of Devon Dr. /First St.), a reduction to the front (south) setback from 15 to 5 feet (to proposed building) (north side of Devon Drive /First Street), a reduction to the front (north) setback from 15 to eight feet (to proposed pavement) (south side of Devon Dr. /First St.), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 to zero ft. (to existing pool deck) (north side of Devon Dr. /First St.), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 to 2.5 ft. (to proposed building) and 7.22 ft. (to existing pool deck) (north side of Devon Drive /First Street), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 to 5 ft. (to proposed pavement) (south side of Devon Dr. /First St.), and an increase to the building height from 35 to 89 ft. (to top of roof deck), under the provisions of Sec. 2- 803.1, and approval of a two -year development order; and (2) Increase of the permitted density by the allocation of 72 overnight accommodation units from the Hotel Density Reserve created pursuant to Beach by Design. (Proposed Use: 108 -room hotel) at 101 & 105 Coronado Dr. & 35 Devon Dr., Begin at the SW corner of Water Lot 1, City Park Subdivision, according to map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 23, Page 37, of the Public Records of Pinellas County Florida; run thence West along the East -West Center Line of Section 8, Township 29 South, Range 15 East, 15 feet to the Point of Beginning' thence South 5 132'30" West along East right -of -way line of Coronado Dr. 16.26 ft.; thence South 84 027'30" East, 100 ft.; thence North 5 132'30" East 78.06 feet; thence Northwesterly along existing along concrete seawall 113.38 feet more or less; thence South 6 010'00" West, 82.63 ft.; thence South 4 °25'11" East, 25.74 ft. to the Point of Beginning and Begin at the Southwest corner of Water Lot 1 of City Park Subdivision, as recorded in Plat Book 23, Page 37, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida; and run thence West along the East and West Center Line of Section 8, Township 29 South, Range 15 East, 15 ft. to the Easterly line of Coronado Dr.; thence South 5 032'30" West, 16.26 ft, for the Point of Beginning; thence continue South 5 032'30" West, 100 feet to the Northerly line of First Avenue, thence North 5 032'30" East, 100 feet; thence North 84 027'30" West, 100 feet to the Point of Beginning.: AND, The North 100 ft of the West 110 ft of Lot 1, Block B, Columbia Subdivision, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 23, Page 60, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2009 -03013 Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearing or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearing. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board or Council, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need to request a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Sec 4 -206 states that party status shall be granted by the Board in quasi-judicial cases if the person requesting such status demonstrates that s /he is substantially affected. Party status entitles parties to personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross - examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests, and needs to be requested and obtained during the case discussion before the CDB. An oath will be administered swearing in all persons giving testimony in quasi-judicial public hearing cases. If you wish to speak at the meeting, please wait to be recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons without party status speaking before the CDB shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes. Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756. Please contact the assigned planner at 562 -4567 to discuss any questions or concerns about the project and /or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan. Michael Delk Cynthia E. Goudeau, MMC Planning Director City Clerk City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758 -4748 NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing. A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL (727) 562 -4093 WITH THEIR REQUEST. To learn more about presenting to Clearwater boards and City Council, go to http: // cearwater .granicus.com /ViewPublisher.php ?view id =11 and click on "Resident Engagement Video." You can also check the informational video out from any Clearwater public library. Ad: 5/7/09 FLD2009- 03012; 107 A H S HOLDINGS LLC ALLEN, DONNA M BARNES FAMILY TRUST 411 WINDWARD PSG 1824 N BETTY LN PO BOX 12733 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - CLEARWATER FL 33755 - ST PETERSBURG FL 33733 - 2733 BLAKE, NEAL G II BOOHER, DOUGLAS L BORDEN, JEANETTE BLAKE, SHERI BOOHER, MERRILI -ANN 46 SUNSET BAY DR 20511 M PERIAL WAY 1234 SUNSET POINT RD BELLEAIR FL 33756 - 1643 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 2570 CLEARWATER FL 33755 -1454 BRINSON, GWENDOLYN M BROCK, DAVID CARPENTER, DONNA L BRINSON, STEPHEN 3881 SWEETBRIAR CT 31 ISLAND WAY # 805 1830 N BETTY LN VIRGINIA BEACH VA 23453 - 2128 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2207 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1906 ORLANDO FL 32806 - 5716 CARPENTER, DONNA CARRASQUILLO, CARMEN M CARUTHERS, LORINE B 1465 SAN JUAN CT CARRASQUILLO, RAFAEL A CARUTHERS, RANDOLPH D CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6051 3136 N KEATING AVE 1827 SYLVAN DR CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1946 CHICAGO IL 60641- 5233 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1946 CLEARWATER VOA ELDERLY HOUSING CONRAD, VICTORIA T COREY, JAMES A 11 1660 DUKE ST 1237 GREENLEA DR 1818 N BETTY LN ALEXANDRIA VA 22314 - 3473 HOLIDAY FL 34691- 6758 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1906 COREY, JESABEL R CRUDER, BETTY J D'ANGELO, CHRISTINE M COREY, RUSSELL P 1919 CHENANGO AVE 1910 COLES RD 1233 VISTA WAY CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1408 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1409 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - DAVIS, NENA DEAN, CRAIG DEDICATED TO PUBLIC DAVIS, WESLEY DEAN, DORENE BY PLAT BK 18 PG 41 1836 N BETTY LN 2511 E COMPTON ST 0 CLEARWATER FL 33755 -1906 ORLANDO FL 32806 - 5716 DIEHL, CHARLES M DWYER, KEITH WILLIAM E & H DIEHL, CHRISTINE A 1608 LAURA ST 3123 JOHNS PKWY 1807 SYLVAN DR CLEARWATER FL 33755 - CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4408 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1946 E & H ECHOLS, DANIEL C EEROLA, TEPPO 8660 PINETREE DR N 1716 DOUGLAS AVE 6822 22ND AVE N # 161 SEMINOLE FL 33772 - DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 3703 ST PETERSBURG FL 33710 - 3918 FAHARI, KERAMAT FAISON, WILLIE G FREDRICKSON, ALFRED 3701 SHORE BLVD 1482 BYRAM DR FREDRICKSON, SHIRLEY OLDSMAR FL 34677 - 5613 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1504 615 CRENSHAW LAKE RD LUTZ FL 33548 - 6106 GAINEY, DANIEL GILBERT, JON D GREENLESS, MARIA 1225 SUNSET POINT RD 1832 PINELAND DR 7900 GREYBIRCH TER CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1456 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1941 PORT RICHEY FL 34668 - 1700 GUY, ALBERT L HAAG, RIAN HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF PINELL GUY, LINDA M 2037 SAN MARINO WAY S 3071 118TH AVE N 1689 OAK PL CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 4136 ST PETERSBURG FL 33716 - CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1351 HALEY, NANCI R HANDI HUSBAND FOR HIRE INC HERNANDEZ, RUFINA 1318 SUNSET POINT RD PO BOX 5052 HERNANDEZ, ANGEL ARMANDO CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1534 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 5052 1835 SYLVAN DR CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1916 HIGHLAND PARK PROPERTY LLC HILL, TERESA M HILLMAN, JEROME 2764 SUNSET POINT RD # 100 1920 N BETTY LN HILLMAN, LILLIAN A CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 1590 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1405 1800 N BETTY LN CLEARWATER FL 33755 -1906 HOUSE, MILTON HOWELL, RICHARD W JEANIS, DIRK R 11 GLEN HILL RD 1121 JACKSON RD JEANIS, MARGARET REDDING CT 06896 - 2901 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4602 1230 CAROLYN LN CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1925 JENQUINE, JOSEPH E KENNE, ROBERT E KENNEMUR, DAVEY JENQUINE, JUDITH M 1469 JACARANDA CIR S 1921 MACOMBER AVE 1891 PARADISE LN CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 5029 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1420 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 1706 KIDD, KAYLA KOSTER, RICHARD JR LAURSEN, HARVEY M KIDD, AARON 1842 SYLVAN DR LAURSEN, STELLA M 1848 PINELAND DR CLEARWATER FL 33755 -1913 235 LOCKLIE ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1911 DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 7555 LUGO, ROBERT MAJORS, HERSCHEL T SR MALONE, TERRANCE E LAWTON, JAMIE LYN 1857 SYLVAN DR 1816 PINELAND DR 1916 MACOMBER AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 -1916 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1941 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1419 MAUS, JOHN MC DONALD, T NEAL MC LAUGHLIN, ROBERT R 1918 MACOMBER AVE 1819 SYLVAN DR 1463 BELCHER RD S CLEARWATER FL 33755 -1419 CLEARWATER FL 33755 -1946 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 2829 ib MEDLIN, DAVID R MENTAVLOS, GEORGE MONASTERIO, MARY GRACE I WEBB, TERESA 1497 MAIN ST MONASTERIO, NEODE 1927 N BETTY LN DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 4612 1908 MACOMBER AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 -1406 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1419 PREWITTE, WANDA L RAMBERT, BARRON REDMOND, CRAIG S THOMSON, FREDERICK P MOORE, TIMOTHY J 1881 SYLVAN DR NGUYEN, DUM VAN NORRIS, MARK A MOORE, SUSAN J CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3662 1856 SYLVAN DR NORRIS, NICOLE M 1217 SHERIDAN RD ROLFE, LAKEYCIA CLEARWATER FL 33755 -1913 1841 SYLVAN DR CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1430 1923 CHENANGO AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 -1916 OBERLIN, MICHAEL O'CONNELL, ROBERT E PARKER, CHARLES OBERLIN, CYNTHIA L SCHMIDT, KATHY O'CONNELL, BARBARA L 1936 MACOMBER AVE 1840 PINELAND DR 510 N FORT HARRISON AVE 2456 BAYWOOD DR W CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1419 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1911 DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 2013 PENNINGER, CRAIG J PENNINGTON, LINDA L PERDOMO, HERNAN G SEARS, JONATHAN W 1931 MACOMBER AVE 1818 SYLVAN RD 306 N LINCOLN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 -1420 CLEARWATER FL 33755 -1945 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4728 PETERS, GEARY E PINELLAS BD OF PUB INST PINELLAS COUNTY 1874 SYLVAN DR PO BOX 2942 315 COURT ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1915 LARGO FL 33779 - 2942 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5165 PREWITTE, WANDA L RAMBERT, BARRON REDMOND, CRAIG S THOMSON, FREDERICK P RAMBERT, MELYNDA 1881 SYLVAN DR 1203 N SATURN AVE 2240 CARDINAL DR CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1917 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3662 FLORISSANT MO 63033 - 2024 ROACH, SCARLET Z ROLFE, LAKEYCIA SALOUS, SAMAHER ROACH, MATTHEW J PO BOX 17452 SALOUS, ABDALLA 1923 CHENANGO AVE TAMPA FL 33682 - 7452 2366 REPUBLIC DR CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1408 DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 9671 SCARPELOS, ANTHONY SCHMIDT, KATHY SCHWARZ, TODD L 1925 N BETTY LN 6634 BOATYARD DR 510 N FORT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1406 HUDSON FL 34667 - 1577 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3905 SIMMONS, JOSEPH SKLAR, STEPHEN H SMITH, SANDRA 611 S FT HARRISON AVE BOX 141 1477 FLANIGAN HILL RD 1806 N BETTY LN CLEARWATER FL 33756 - HINSDALE NY 14743 - 9628 CLEARWATER FL 33755 -1906 SPENCER, ROBERT JOHN STABLER, DOROTHY S THOMPSON, DANIEL LOUIS 4730 S BOSTON PL 1212 CAROLYN LN THOMPSON, SONJA MARCELA TULSA OK 71405 - CLEARWATER FL 33755 -1925 1801 SYLVAN DR CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1946 t. THOMSON, FREDERICK P TKACHEV, MIKHAIL TSETSEKAS, DIMITRIOS THOMSON, NATALIE R TKACHEV, LUEMILA 1213 SHERIDAN RD 1837 SYLVAN DR 7825 STARSHELL DR CLEARWATER FL 33755 -1430 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1916 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648 - 5428 , 3 r TURNER, STUART USA FED NATL MTG ASSN VERUASA, CATALINO A 955 BRUCE AVE 950 E PACES FERRY RD VERUASA, ELIZABETH A CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1011 ATLANTA GA 30326 - 9430 LARKBUNTING DR TAMPA FL 33647 - 2822 VIDILI, ANTONIO VIDILI, TINA 1821 SYLVAN DR CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1946 WALKER, RICHARD CONSTR CO PO BOX 1259 HILLIARD FL 32046 - 1259 WICKHAM, WILLIAM H WICHHAM, MARTHA 7600 128TH ST SEMINOLE FL 33776 - 4105 YEAGLER, DANIEL 11855 SE 74TH TER BELLEVIEW FL 34420 - 4638 WALDORF, MARK E 1440 TEMPLE ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2335 WALTER, TRACY G CLEMO, RICK 9410 SEMINOLE BLVD SEMINOLE FL 33772 - 2516 WILLIAMS, HARRY C JR 1209 VISTA WAY CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1948 ZAND, KENNETH K ZAND, LISA MICHELLE 617 JACARANDA ST DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 7709 WALKER, JOHN EST 1850 PINELAND DR CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1911 WELTMER, SCOTT WELTMER, BETTY JANE 1015 GRANADA ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 -1035 WRIGHT, TERRY R 1926 CHENANGO AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1407 �__ ..r - ►` : A • S� ET POINT .T iVSif ■ ■�� �� r _ a �• i �• tf�*�� tea* � A 1^ ks� p : Z VISTA WAS. ^ ♦ . ■ ■ .;�" � .D� ,r.' ' �■■■O; y r. Owner: Habitat for Humanity of Pinellas County Cases: FLD2009-03012 PLT2009-00001 1888 N. Betty • ••' 8.89 acres PIN: 03-29-15-00000-420-0140 Atlas Page: 260B Map Output Page 1 of 2 http:// publicgis. myclearwater .comiservieticom.esri. esrimap . Esrimap?ServiceName= OVMap... 3/4/2009 Map Output Page 1 of 2 http: / /publicgis.myclearwater. comiservleticom. esri. esrimap.Esrimap ?ServiceName =OV Map... 3/4/2009 View looking W at northern leg of proposed Stevens Creek Drive View looking S at western leg of proposed Stevens Creek Drive View looking S at W side of property from approximately Lot 12 View looking S at existing cross street within proposed subdivision (roadway to be removed) View looking E at southern leg of proposed Stevens Creek Drive View looking N along Pineland Drive at proposed subdivision (Lots 48 -51 on right; rear of Lots 10-17 in background where fence is located) 1888 N. Betty Lane FLD2009- 03012/PLT2009 -00001 Page 1 of 3 View looking N along N. Betty Lane from northern leg of proposed Stevens Creek Dive (subject property on left) View looking S along W side of N. Betty Lane at detached dwellings south of subject property View looking SW at attached dwelling complex to south of subject property (1770 N. Betty Lane) View looking S along N. Betty Lane from northern leg of proposed Stevens Creek Drive (subject property on right) View looking E from subject property at public school property on E side of N. Betty Lane View looking N from parking lot of attached dwelling complex at the south side of subject property in background (where fence is located ) 1888 N. Betty Lane FLD2009- 03012/PLT2009 -00001 Page 2 of 3 View looking N from Vista Way at existing homes on W side of Pineland Drive and W of subject property View looking SW at existing homes on S side of Vista Way W of Pineland Drive and W of subject property 1888 N. Betty Lane FLD2009- 03012/PLT2009 -00001 Page 3 of 3 CONSTRUCTION PLANS LOCATION MAP LEGAL DESCRIPTION LO W Q SHEET INDEX Q Y 9 c�> THAT PORTION OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 29 D Q a Q> �> Q a 1 COVER SHEET DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY �° ° � UNION STREET � 2 PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR POINT OF REFERENCE, COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 3; Q 3 SITE & SI DEVMALK PLAN TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, THENCE RUN NORTH 00'08'18" WEST, ALONG THE � 4 PRE - DEVELOPED DRAINAGE MAP EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 3, A DISTANCE OF 858.00 FEET, THENCE RUN NORTH ° PROJECT 89'36'07" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1372.75 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST RIGHT OF w LOCATION 5 OVERALL DRAINAGE MAP WAY LINE OF BETTY LANE (60 RIGHT OF WAY), THENCE RUN NORTH 00 07 27 WEST � 6 PAVING, N G G R,�'� 1 N G & DRAINAGE NAG E ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY, A DISTANCE OF 1057.22 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, , , PLAN THENCE ��RUN NORTH 89-12'39" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 504.62 FEET, THENCE ��RUN SOUTH 7 - 9 PAVING GRADING, &DRAINAGE DETAILS 00011'44" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 220.00 FEET, THENCE RUN NORTH 8912 39 WEST, A �u SUNSET POINT RD. DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET, TO A POINT ON THE EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF PINELAND _ 576 7 O WATER �c SEER PL DRIVE (60' R /W), THENCE RUN NORTH 00'11'44" WEST, ALONG SAID RIGHT OF _WAY, A ; AN DISTANCE OF 776.10 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY WITH THE Q a 11 - 12 WATER &TIER DETAILS CENTER LINE OF SPRINGTIME BRANCH, THENCE RUN IN A SOUTHEASTERLY AND ° NORTHEASTERLY DIRECTION ALONG THE CENTER LINE OF SAID SPRINGTIME BRANCH TO A.., , V J Z z 13 TREE PRESERVATION POINT OF INTERSECTION OF SPRINGTIME BRANCH AND THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE 0 Q w &LANDSCAPE PLAN OF SUNSET POINT ROAD (83 R /W), THENCE RUN SOUTH 89-12'39" EAST ALONG SAID � w _j z RIGHT OF WAY, A DISTANCE OF 147.49 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY ° z >- w LINE OF BETTY LANE (60' R /W), THENCE RUN SOUTH 00'07'27" EAST A DISTANCE OF > 698.09 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. OAF m o 0 CONTAINING 387,255.11 SQ. FT. OR 8.89 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. 2 q'Qp z J o o F OY _ c� w = z N.T.S. Y OWNER/DEVELOPER: z 375 E DREW STREET 90 N " o CD Section 3, Township 29 South, Range 15 East -Habtat 0 N Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida: for Humanity of Pinellas County L a I 3071 118th Avenue North St. Petersburg, Florida 33716 SITE PLAN APPROVED CASE PHONE: 727- 536 -4755 CASE # � -g2oo9 -o3yIZ�P� -, 0 CASE TYPE 00001 DRC DATE 447-101 w CDB DATE v=i SIGNATUR DATE s Cn ENGINEER: o U CUMBEY & FAIR, INC. EYJ O WARNING CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS N ENGINEERING PLANNING LAND SURVEYS Q) ABOVE GROUND OR UNDERGROUND UTILITIES MAY BE IN to THE AREA OF THIS PROJECT - PROCEED WITH CAUTION. S CONTRACTOR IS TO CALL THE SUNSHINE STATE ONE CALL 2463 ENTERPRISE ROAD CLEARWATER (727) 797 -8982 ` e" REV 1 S 1 O N S AT 1- 800 - 432 -4770 AND LOCAL POWER COMPANY CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33763 -1790 TAMPA (813) 223 -4333 48 HOURS BEFORE BEGINNING WORK. CONTRACTOR TO �. o BY DATE DESCRIPTION BY DATE DESCRIPTION PROTECT ALL EXISTING UTILITIES IN THE AREAS OF CONSTRUCTION. 0 / U 00 O U I SHEET NO. 1 STEVENS CREEK CONSTRUCTION PLANS LOCATION MAP LEGAL DESCRIPTION LO W Q SHEET INDEX Q Y 9 c�> THAT PORTION OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 29 D Q a Q> �> Q a 1 COVER SHEET DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY �° ° � UNION STREET � 2 PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR POINT OF REFERENCE, COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 3; Q 3 SITE & SI DEVMALK PLAN TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, THENCE RUN NORTH 00'08'18" WEST, ALONG THE � 4 PRE - DEVELOPED DRAINAGE MAP EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 3, A DISTANCE OF 858.00 FEET, THENCE RUN NORTH ° PROJECT 89'36'07" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1372.75 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST RIGHT OF w LOCATION 5 OVERALL DRAINAGE MAP WAY LINE OF BETTY LANE (60 RIGHT OF WAY), THENCE RUN NORTH 00 07 27 WEST � 6 PAVING, N G G R,�'� 1 N G & DRAINAGE NAG E ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY, A DISTANCE OF 1057.22 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, , , PLAN THENCE ��RUN NORTH 89-12'39" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 504.62 FEET, THENCE ��RUN SOUTH 7 - 9 PAVING GRADING, &DRAINAGE DETAILS 00011'44" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 220.00 FEET, THENCE RUN NORTH 8912 39 WEST, A �u SUNSET POINT RD. DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET, TO A POINT ON THE EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF PINELAND _ 576 7 O WATER �c SEER PL DRIVE (60' R /W), THENCE RUN NORTH 00'11'44" WEST, ALONG SAID RIGHT OF _WAY, A ; AN DISTANCE OF 776.10 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY WITH THE Q a 11 - 12 WATER &TIER DETAILS CENTER LINE OF SPRINGTIME BRANCH, THENCE RUN IN A SOUTHEASTERLY AND ° NORTHEASTERLY DIRECTION ALONG THE CENTER LINE OF SAID SPRINGTIME BRANCH TO A.., , V J Z z 13 TREE PRESERVATION POINT OF INTERSECTION OF SPRINGTIME BRANCH AND THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE 0 Q w &LANDSCAPE PLAN OF SUNSET POINT ROAD (83 R /W), THENCE RUN SOUTH 89-12'39" EAST ALONG SAID � w _j z RIGHT OF WAY, A DISTANCE OF 147.49 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY ° z >- w LINE OF BETTY LANE (60' R /W), THENCE RUN SOUTH 00'07'27" EAST A DISTANCE OF > 698.09 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. OAF m o 0 CONTAINING 387,255.11 SQ. FT. OR 8.89 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. 2 q'Qp z J o o F OY _ c� w = z N.T.S. Y OWNER/DEVELOPER: z 375 E DREW STREET 90 N " o CD Section 3, Township 29 South, Range 15 East -Habtat 0 N Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida: for Humanity of Pinellas County L a I 3071 118th Avenue North St. Petersburg, Florida 33716 SITE PLAN APPROVED CASE PHONE: 727- 536 -4755 CASE # � -g2oo9 -o3yIZ�P� -, 0 CASE TYPE 00001 DRC DATE 447-101 w CDB DATE v=i SIGNATUR DATE s Cn ENGINEER: o U CUMBEY & FAIR, INC. EYJ O WARNING CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS N ENGINEERING PLANNING LAND SURVEYS Q) ABOVE GROUND OR UNDERGROUND UTILITIES MAY BE IN to THE AREA OF THIS PROJECT - PROCEED WITH CAUTION. S CONTRACTOR IS TO CALL THE SUNSHINE STATE ONE CALL 2463 ENTERPRISE ROAD CLEARWATER (727) 797 -8982 ` e" REV 1 S 1 O N S AT 1- 800 - 432 -4770 AND LOCAL POWER COMPANY CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33763 -1790 TAMPA (813) 223 -4333 48 HOURS BEFORE BEGINNING WORK. CONTRACTOR TO �. o BY DATE DESCRIPTION BY DATE DESCRIPTION PROTECT ALL EXISTING UTILITIES IN THE AREAS OF CONSTRUCTION. 0 / U 00 O U I SHEET NO. 1 w 3 4 � w Z 1 1 owe (n Qw dZw O N 1 a °6 w O r- r c� I � n I r- CO O 1 Z CENTERLINE SUNSET POINT ROAD 83' R/W SOUTH R//�Wy LINE OF FPKN &D S.89*12'39 *E 160.255' SU -- NSE7 {'OINT ROAD LB 938 147.49' UTII _A NT 1 (O.R 5404 PG74 7 / lot PARCEL # 03-29-15-00000-420-0150 �tij• "� J�Fe� PRO OSED 50' DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT �y / DRAINAGE EASEMENT — (O.R. 6531, PG 2350) N 69 o cl '- ------ - - - - -- - - - - -- LO G \ 24r4, 12.5' / rcuTrci 1mr nr _ N 10 6 6 o BEARING i 'w .. L1 S I E 12.10' L2 100.0' d- E 34.99' 1 S O E 45.84' r S 71'43'15" ° 50 ° to 36.51' L5 N `r' 5,501 S.F. `n O 74.97' L6 I W O 95,75' L7 N oN E 100,0' L8 L 0 53'58'01 " E 90.90' L9 N 1 51 C6 E 69.89' L10 'n 5,582 S.F. U"' 26'58'15" i 11.22' FCM 4 "x4" o, (ILLEGIBLE) 1 I N.89'12'39 "W 100.00' FOP 1 /2" W I I UNED _I PARCEL # 03-29-15— 00000- 420 -0100 U R E V I S 1 0 N S :T BY GATE DESCRIPTION BY DATE DESCRIPTION i OJS 3/1/9 ADD VACATE ESMT NOTE 3 0 U 00 0 i U I LOT 1 SUN VIEW (P•B. 117 PG 48) UNPLATTED PARCEL # 03- 29- 15- 00000- 420 -0100 CUMBEY & FAIR, INC. FOR CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS ENGINEERING PLANNING LAND SURVEYS 2463 ENTERPRISE ROAD CLEARWATER 797 -8982 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33763 -1790 TAMPA 223 -4333 30.00' 1 50 25 0 50 SCALE IN FEET SCALE: 1 "= 50' 1 N Z� I O I m Iw z I LW W U 'I 1 I I IW NI � f\ �I 0 0 W z N �i G ZI to N.89_36b7" ii 1372.7 PL i N I M z 0 0 co 00 0 o W z J col al $ I—J z POINT OF REFERENCE SE CORNER OF SECTION 3 -29 -15 Habitat for Humanity of Pinellas County, Inc. 3071 118th Avenue North St. Petersburg, Florida 33716 E "E N's V P�O�K Ao"'Ah'UBDIVISION N S C RL� Lz Z:� PRELIMINARY PLAT SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST CITY OF CLEARWATER, PINELLAS COUNTY FLORIDA LEGAL DESCRIPTION: THAT PORTION OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: FOR POINT OF REFERENCE, COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, THENCE RUN NORTH 00'08'18" WEST, ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 3, A DISTANCE OF 858.00 FEET, THENCE RUN NORTH 89'36'07" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1372.75 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF BETTY LANE (60' RIGHT OF WAY), THENCE RUN NORTH 00'07'27" WEST ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY, A DISTANCE OF 1057.22 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE RUN NORTH 89'12'39" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 504.62 FEET, THENCE RUN SOUTH 00'11'44" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 220.00 FEET, THENCE RUN NORTH 89'12'39" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET, TO A POINT ON THE EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF PINELAND DRIVE (60' R /W), THENCE RUN NORTH 00'11'4.4" -WEST, ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY, A DISTANCE OF 776.10 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY WITH THE CENTER LINE OF SPRINGTIME BRANCH, THENCE RUN IN A SOUTHEASTERLY AND NORTHEASTERLY( DIRECTION ALONG THE CENTER LINE OF SAID SPRINGTIME BRANCH TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION OF SPRINGTIME BRANCH AND THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SUNSET POINT ROAD (83' R /W), THENCE RUN SOUTH 89'12'39" EAST ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY, A DISTANCE OF 147.49 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST RIGHT OF-WAY LINE OF BETTY LANE (60' R /W), THENCE RUN SOUTH 00'07'27" EAST A DISTANCE OF 698.09 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 387,255.11 SO. FT. OR 8.89 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. LINE TABLE: LINE BEARING DISTANCE L1 S 70'41'21" E 12.10' L2 S 87'01'50" E 34.99' L3 S 60'57'05" E 45.84' L4 S 71'43'15" E 36.51' L5 N 87'24' 19" W 74.97' L6 N 63'58'51" E 95,75' L7 N 85'46'33" E 36.91' L8 N 53'58'01 " E 90.90' L9 N 37'01'56" E 69.89' L10 N 26'58'15" E 11.22' LEGEND: P. B. PLAT BOOK PG. PAGE (D) DEED MEASUREMENT S.F. SQUARE FEET R/W RIGHT OF WAY 0. R. OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK * EXISTING EASEMENTS ON LOTS 16, 17, 24, 1 & 2 TO BE VACATED SIMULTANEOUS TO THE PROCESSING OF PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLATS. M.C. 01/09 ..,. s 'rp -• ,.�:�.. DRWN BY: DATE OJECT DSGN BY: DATE '• f �.• •� of F r1. CHKD BY: DATE �4 SUBMITTED BY: ; ' �• 2�� ' ; CAD FILE NO.: SCALE: 1 50' PANKAJ SHAH, P.E. #2 $ r�'��• FLORIDA REGISTERED ENG�NE��D�,' • �, jbAIGINAL TZZcE1VGD 111ty % 2909 KAi\9�jNrW DPI Mjrt;,. 0J7 MY OF CLEARW�, STEVENS CREEK SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAT SHEET 2 JOB NO. 018C SIDEWALK NOTE: I I Z SW 1; PROPOSED EASEMENT 47.7 42.0 42.0 87.3' ¢ W Qp SW 7 DRAINAGE SW 2 -7 r/2t PROP. 10' S 2 -5 a O SW 1 -/°R EASEMENT DRAINAGE & n- I w l tVS1�J 1 81 - - - - _`��� JD -3 G•1 o I ( N 10' 13.4'r .01 ��/ / / / / WETLAND JURISDICTIONAL 51 9 50 49 48 1 I 1 I$ I s.0' i iJDF --,3Ar LINE SPRING .TOP OF BANK 17 16 t I��` N J I ^ I PROPOSED I I I PROP. 10' UTILITY I ` / /JD' -4 O 10' DRAINAGE 1 I 13 12 V. EASEMENT o 0 EASEMENT co ! INSTALL "NO PARKING I a I 0 ( �I `9. DRAINAGE 115 14 ®60L 0 HYDRANT SIDE 11 lI i / i / i EXIST. CONC. I I EASEMENT / / JD -5 RETAINING WALL 80.9 4 1 OF R AD (TYP.) 52.3' 55.0' _5.5.0 ---- ' \ 1 -1 ' ER. 10' UTILITY ESM'T. (O.R. 5415, PG. 89) 41.2' I (_ - - S.00011 44"E 220.00' - __-- - - - - -� - - - - ¢ ' ' ' ' ' '� PROPOSED PROP. 15 SEWER UTILITY - - _ - - - - - - JD -6 L - - n I EASEMENT O ;.::: - : r :.• :: :..�.,, - 19.0' �bg0 I / / CENTERLINE OF �9 •t y 0' 132. FX rVALLEY GU TIER G RT- .' ':� SETBACK / SPRINGTIME BRANCH Z DRAINAGE & UTILITY 18 / / -TX. 74`"ASPI47WT. EASEMENT SITE DATA EXISTING Zoning District: MDR POINT NORTHING EASTING Gross Area 12.10' PROPOSED SIDEWALKS ON LOTS NO. S JD 2 1329694.55 402623.37 N/A Lot Depth: 1,2,6,7,8,13,14,15, &LOTS NO. 20 TO 27 Living Units JD 3 1329695.90 402653.29 Building Coverage E (Sq.Ft. and % of Impervious Area): 56,450 (41.5 %) JD 3A 1329694.22 402669.69 0.35 Vehicular Use Area WILL BE BONDED (Sq.Ft. and % of Impervious Area): 79,415 (58.5 %) Gross Floor Area and F.A.R.: N/A Setbacks 85'46'33" (Also Included Dimensions 36.91' Jos 1329688.77 402706.80 E 90.90' L9 N JD 6 1329678,46 402733.58 in N 26'58' 15" E JD 7 1329678.20 402744.43 ,n V Q O DRI VE n JD 8 1329669.90 402762.92 � Q Q PINELAND JD 9 1329669.52 402786.20 FIRE j 60' RAW C3 JD 10 1329678.04 402833.79 HYD• CU -�T ^� -- -„ n--•', a.. .,1. _ y JD 11 1329684.27 402857.93 - -7 7T ��� ';` "' -�' • 4.t 1,• -,2• • 4 x, :1 �If'•' 1 r'i: - W w3 _ . , , x rt" ." M I.1 r.. ., t •�,n -.r ='_�_' 'x,r 'r.'�•-, sr . sa` jt, b a ? . 1n F . �- °r• � c JD 1 2 3 1 6 329 84.9 3 1329699.79 4 0 881.17 402898.99 - ,•��:' -,•< _ li =• 1' }, E F 0 R - E : <' , 4 c� ..) r•t ..,,•'�r.a ....._. _- - - - JD 14 1329714.86 4 1 029 1.16 PROP. 6 HIGH OPAQUE m JD 15 1329727.70 402917.26 w 3 VINYL FENCE - COLOR TO END 6' HIGH / JD 16 1329717.94 402934.31 BEGIN 6' HIGH N.0011'44"W 776.10 BE SELECTED BY OWNER VINYL FENCE JD 17 1329744.0 402990.4 VINYL FENCE U JD 18 1329744.05 402990.46 EAST R W LINE OF P/NELAND DRIVE JD-1 _ - JD 19 1329786.80 403027.20 - - 55.0' 55.0 55.0 82.8' _ 75.4 4 SW 1 -5 180.1 ' o DRAINAGE " 'f 89:7 SW 2 -1 O • - 18. r W ,� _ 109.3 _ o w S 2 -4 to / 82,2 / / 17.78' ��" " JD -2 �,/ JD 20 JD 21 1329809.95 1329845.58 403049.92 403067.42 I I Z SW 1; PROPOSED EASEMENT 47.7 42.0 42.0 87.3' ¢ W Qp SW 7 DRAINAGE SW 2 -7 r/2t PROP. 10' S 2 -5 a O SW 1 -/°R EASEMENT DRAINAGE & n- I w l tVS1�J 1 81 - - - - _`��� JD -3 G•1 o I ( N 10' 13.4'r .01 ��/ / / / / WETLAND JURISDICTIONAL 51 9 50 49 48 1 I 1 I$ I s.0' i iJDF --,3Ar LINE SPRING .TOP OF BANK 17 16 t I��` N J I ^ I PROPOSED I I I PROP. 10' UTILITY I ` / /JD' -4 O 10' DRAINAGE 1 I 13 12 V. EASEMENT o 0 EASEMENT co ! INSTALL "NO PARKING I a I 0 ( �I `9. DRAINAGE 115 14 ®60L 0 HYDRANT SIDE 11 lI i / i / i EXIST. CONC. I I EASEMENT / / JD -5 RETAINING WALL 80.9 4 1 OF R AD (TYP.) 52.3' 55.0' _5.5.0 ---- ' \ 1 -1 ' ER. 10' UTILITY ESM'T. (O.R. 5415, PG. 89) 41.2' I (_ - - S.00011 44"E 220.00' - __-- - - - - -� - - - - ¢ ' ' ' ' ' '� PROPOSED PROP. 15 SEWER UTILITY - - _ - - - - - - JD -6 L - - n I EASEMENT O ;.::: - : r :.• :: :..�.,, - 19.0' �bg0 I / / CENTERLINE OF �9 •t y 0' 132. FX rVALLEY GU TIER G RT- .' ':� SETBACK / SPRINGTIME BRANCH Z DRAINAGE & UTILITY 18 / / -TX. 74`"ASPI47WT. EASEMENT SITE DATA PROPOSED MDR Single- family residential 387,255 (8.89) 4,019 S.F. 40.9 @ FRONT SETBACK 95' 51 5.74 84,538 (61.0 %) 138,698 0.38 54,160 (39.0 %) N/A REQUIRED /ALLOWED (MIN. OR MAX.1 N/A N/A Front: 25' 19'* Side: N/A 5' Rear: 20' 10' Height: - - - - 30' Parking (Per Living Unit): 1.5 2 ** * 19' front on both sides for double frontage lots. Lots #1, #27, #28, #34, #41, and #42• ** One in garage and one in driveway N/A N/A N/A 66 7.5 19.0' / ,. :t a., ,:o. +'r•.; ....: <.•... - \ �• :.I / / 9b i SETBACK / �• - - - - - \ I / / ` J Z I r / TRACT B I (TOT LOT) 19 g p • `' \ r CONST. 4.0' r / � �: d s I ��\ CONCRETE N w 41 \ SIDEWALK I o I 8 42 J 95.7 \ I 1 CONST. 4.0' FIRE "' I I. CONCRETE 127.4' HYD. I I I ° SIDEWALK .5' �~��� / 25 0/ _ _ - . CONST 4.0 I I \ •' PROPOSED 10 TE DRAINAGE EASEMENT SIDEWALK 101.9 CONCRE n ; / / // / JD -t2 0 95.7' �, l 1 122.0' I 1 FIRE 7 9 CONST. 12' ( 4.0' TYP. 4.8• \ 1 HYD. / / , 'C►. I VERTICAL PIN Np I I . ?;: I 13 ' 1�/ / / / JD -13 o = CURB I Q °° �-g3 / / / / / PROPOSED 10' c �I 21 I: • I I i ) 43 C.4 :a DRAINAGE EASEMENT c0 1 V I I I PROPOSED 10' UTILITY /Jd1 95.7' 4.0' 39 EASEMENT FOR POWER, TELEPHONE, 0 CONST.- 10' 122.0' 6 AND CABLE TV VERTICAL PIN tJ ^ \ •;. // D 1 LINE TABLE. FIN " 40 20 0 40 SCALE IN FEET 1" 40' LINE EXISTING Zoning District: MDR Use: Medium density Multi- family residential Site Area Sq. Ft. (Acres) 387,255 (8.89) Gross Area 12.10' (within property lines): S Lot Area (Sq.Ft.): N/A Lot Width: N/A Lot Depth: N/A Living Units 61 Density (units /ac.): 6.97 Building Coverage E (Sq.Ft. and % of Impervious Area): 56,450 (41.5 %) Total Impervious Area (Sq. Ft.): 135,865 Total Impervious Surface (ISR): 0.35 Vehicular Use Area N (Sq.Ft. and % of Impervious Area): 79,415 (58.5 %) Gross Floor Area and F.A.R.: N/A Setbacks 85'46'33" (Also Included Dimensions 36.91' On Site Plan Drawing) in Feet N PROPOSED MDR Single- family residential 387,255 (8.89) 4,019 S.F. 40.9 @ FRONT SETBACK 95' 51 5.74 84,538 (61.0 %) 138,698 0.38 54,160 (39.0 %) N/A REQUIRED /ALLOWED (MIN. OR MAX.1 N/A N/A Front: 25' 19'* Side: N/A 5' Rear: 20' 10' Height: - - - - 30' Parking (Per Living Unit): 1.5 2 ** * 19' front on both sides for double frontage lots. Lots #1, #27, #28, #34, #41, and #42• ** One in garage and one in driveway N/A N/A N/A 66 7.5 19.0' / ,. :t a., ,:o. +'r•.; ....: <.•... - \ �• :.I / / 9b i SETBACK / �• - - - - - \ I / / ` J Z I r / TRACT B I (TOT LOT) 19 g p • `' \ r CONST. 4.0' r / � �: d s I ��\ CONCRETE N w 41 \ SIDEWALK I o I 8 42 J 95.7 \ I 1 CONST. 4.0' FIRE "' I I. CONCRETE 127.4' HYD. I I I ° SIDEWALK .5' �~��� / 25 0/ _ _ - . CONST 4.0 I I \ •' PROPOSED 10 TE DRAINAGE EASEMENT SIDEWALK 101.9 CONCRE n ; / / // / JD -t2 0 95.7' �, l 1 122.0' I 1 FIRE 7 9 CONST. 12' ( 4.0' TYP. 4.8• \ 1 HYD. / / , 'C►. I VERTICAL PIN Np I I . ?;: I 13 ' 1�/ / / / JD -13 o = CURB I Q °° �-g3 / / / / / PROPOSED 10' c �I 21 I: • I I i ) 43 C.4 :a DRAINAGE EASEMENT c0 1 V I I I PROPOSED 10' UTILITY /Jd1 95.7' 4.0' 39 EASEMENT FOR POWER, TELEPHONE, 0 CONST.- 10' 122.0' 6 AND CABLE TV VERTICAL PIN tJ ^ \ •;. // D 1 LINE TABLE. FIN " 40 20 0 40 SCALE IN FEET 1" 40' LINE BEARING DISTANCE L1 S 70'41'21" E 12.10' L2 S 87'01'50" E 34.99' L3 S 80.57'05" E 45.84' L4 S 71'43' 15" E 36.51' L5 N 87'24'19 " W 74.97' L6 N 63'58'51 " E 95.75' L7 N 85'46'33" E 36.91' L8 N 53'58'01 " E 90.90' L9 N 37'01'56" E 69.89' in N 26'58' 15" E 11 LEGEND BOUNDARY LINE WETLAND JURISDICTIONAL LINE DENOTES WETLAND BUFFER AREA DENOTES WETLAND BUFFER COMPENSTATION AREA DENOTES WETLAND BUFFER DEFICIT AREA 3 CURB I w / \ ' 3• 15 EX. 50' DRNG. & UT1L. ESM'T N/A �, 22 I N 1 I 44 0 \`^ \ G \ :y\ ��• .0' (O.R. 6531, PG. 2350) TREE PRESERVATION JD -17 WETLAND EASEMENT PRESERVAT ION ON N 38 r EASEMENT CO 00 Z I I \ EXI ALLEY . � 5 2. Ag1 � UTTER CURB \ (• I I s I \ (TYP. BOTH SIDES) v " JO -18 WETLAND JURISDICTIONAVjx - I I C ��OND 3 Q�\ \• ' \ �g1•a ' / .�� LINE & EX. TOP OF BAt�. 45 SPRING BRANCH CREE Z c I = 1 0l I PROPOSED ( \ 37 \ ..\ \ / / / I cv 23 I 10' UTILITY \ \\ CONST. 4.0' a -� �• N/A I EASEMENT \\ CONCRETE _ W I'fl .r 0. SIDEWALK 4 \ / % / o z I � 95.7 122.0 z0 1a �� \\ / / \/JD-1 �9 v�cRn �I EX. TIL. ESM'T. "2" (O.R. 5404, PG. - Y I I • ' I 46 \ 36 \ ' ' / ' JD- Q 10' -25' cov 24 AS 1 PROPOSED AS IS 122.0' o DRAINAGE \ 1 I I ESM'T. \ -11 • M ( EXIST. 2' VALLEY \ ,yp8 3' M \yam \ :\ 3 0 -5 1 I m GUTTER CURB 0' -10' I t ; I (TYP. BOTH SIDES) 35 Q I� 47 I 25 - - - -=- 0J °� 30' -50' ' i w 122.0' 227.7' PROP.. 20' DRAINAGE & UTILITY ESM'T. \ '' to • , I Y W 83.2' 42. ' 48.0' 48.0' 48.0' 42.0 58.5 \N ` ;: 2 I P OPOSS I 04 a� I PROPOSED 10 UTILITY W - �' AINAGE �/ I 2 EASEMENT FOR POWER, I W Ln PROPOSED '. , \ I�• ';' E SEMENT '�� \ �� v/ I o w I LEPHONE, AND CABLE N I '` , ( t ..•. I I I CONST. 80.0 L.F. 2.0 10 UTILITY CONST. 82. L.F. 2.0 � I I I EXI I �I IT STORMWA VALLEY GUTTER CURB PER EASEMENT 1 , W VALLEY GUTTE CURB PER S L6 CITY OF CLEARWATER 1908 CITY ;RwATER TO REMAIN #10 INDEX O Z a i y 2.3' 04 95.7 W" I ;• o c o POND 1 I L If II II s / I I I °0 a I I I 30 31 I I INSTALL "NO PARKING---'I'!. 28 ° 29 - SA FIRE LANE" SIGN SPACED 3 -5 ®60' ON HYDRANT SIDE I I (� INSTALL "NO PARKING SSW 3 -1� OF ROgQ (TYP.) I I (�. I I I I FIRE LANE SIGN SPACED rW) I (� I I I 0 60 ON HYDRANT SIDE I I I OF ROAD (TYP.) I ` � - I - r:• � PROP. 10 UTILITY ESM'T- r. I 1 95.7' - FIRE p 28.0• EX o D�RPINAGE & UTILITY ESM'T. (O.R. PG. 2350) �,0, ,{g,0' 48.0' 42.0' 84.8' / 2 .0' : d 188.7' SIG AIJ _84 4 _________ _______ ___ ___________ _____ gX� - - 7 - -� 7 - - EX��W - - - -- Fa. .�. w''` --�_� - - - - -- ----------- S.=7±27!E- MOO' - - --� r - -- ;._ F� o�'':.--- - - - - -- EX= S� - - -- - -- - - -�%l ------------------- �y����tr� - - -- EX.2' VALLEY GUTTER CURB � -------- - - - - -- - EX. 26 ASPH. PAV'T. CONST. SIDEWALK CURB CONST. SIDEWALK CURB _ _ _ _ CUT RAMP PER CITY OF - - ZUT-RA RP -PER- Cl IT ut- y- - - CLEARWATER INDEX #109 CLEARWATER INDEX ` #109 N. BETTY LANE 60' R/W Ewa C4 �V u z y of O. z N W 0 ° IRRI rA W o 9 m O W W W 0: U) Z LLI > W ' - U) ZO > Q N 0: 1111C A IL Q U) 00 W E • W Z o n a Z o 00 a- ate, o Ln 0 3 Z a a. W c ao ® Q -I w w oaCL 0 0 0 O ® Ln v =N ,n V Q O n W Z Q Q a j C3 M W CU Q _ y v � Z N 0: SS `0 v CL Cy- M m m F w 3 � cc� U N U O W W W 0: U) Z LLI > W ' - U) ZO > Q N WJ 1111C A IL Q U) W E O Z aM z ill 00 a- ate, o Ln 4- O a. ao ® AZ a� O w w oaCL 0 0 0 M ® Ln r O W f- t� W 7 Ix L W W W 0: U) Z LLI > W ' - U) ZO > Q N WJ 1111C A IL Q U) W O Z 00 C14 w 0 w w 0 0 0 C. 000 =N I``I- Q Q Eli CU _ SS M m m Z z 0 0 a U f- t� W 7 Ix L W W 0: U) Z LLI > W ' - U) ZO > Q N WJ 1111C A IL Q U) o U z CO th M W � 0 W N d N 0 N Q I 3 h W I 2 O THIS PROJECT LIES WITHIN FLOOD ZONES "X" AND AE (B.F.E. = 11) AS DEPICTED ON FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP, COMMUNITY NUMBER #125096 (MAP NUMBER 12103C 0106H), REVISED MAY 17, 2005. WATER SUPPLY WELL NOTE: PURSUANT TO SWFWMD B.O.R. - CHAPTER 5, SECTION 5.3 THERE CAN BE NO WATER SUPPLY WELLS LOCATED WITHIN 100.0 FEET OF A STORMWATER FACILITY. LEGEND DRAINAGE BASIN BOUNDARY LINE SUB -BASIN BOUNDARY LINE ®� �• FLOOD ZONE BOUNDARY LINE �FJ PINEL AND DR/ VE '>>> J _ _ 60' RIW - - - ��o y# -�� ---•� - - -v v1�� b xv� ls�x`h. xe`' x` tiv Xvb0a, x �'�- -x v1ti ! X '� X /� \ /> X !� y X \1h \1. \1^� !j, X . ,y1 0� 6 X g - ! -�iC •-t- 6, !s 1 9pX (EX. ASPH: PAV'T.) 6 s �� \1. \o. r, r-�E- o e 15'_3 a EDP x- -'�-- - o�E- -_ _x . --''-; .. - 1 • ! �h 's> - �x� -\ \�,• DITCH k X • o -- s, b o \> ti ES -04 o '> ,> x • �y \1ti \1 • x . ?� \o X e `r X, s DITCH 'p ss9 's ' ?� \�' \b' / EX. DITCH h ?o \� X s! �9 ,h10 h^� \hoh \off' 16 .'1- - . .. \0,1 --�P -- �� X x X x {p ` _ _X x "11 X 'S >�' •+�Bd hod _ \0��0�- 10 •o 'srr /> 'r` �- ls�i T- �r- • -ter-- 6--3(� `boo ES -OS X 1°` '``�h },•` \� L l i ~- S 7.% a: oN �� /� ` X 6 /> X 6 -02 EXIST. RETENTION AREA POND #1 ' ? >� _x ES -h �. `,` JD -2 i ` \� �> tib Oy ES- 1 `1 `1 76 - X'�s BOTTOM OF POND !? BEGIN 4' CLF ?6,, END 6' WF ! >/ \ 6 METAL , 6,x ! !7 s , ti1 , ! s �•, FENCE ' > >9 ES -06 w% \0�0 \�`'� JD- X xBASIN: PRE- PINELAND x, 6' " \� - x- x, > i{ \ \�� 6 V� x s 4 CLF �`'' `x'12 90 WETLAND JURISDICTIONAL 7s /9 x! I 9' ,9 ,P, 79 JD 3A LINE & EX. TOP OF BANK ss > 7, 9, ; EX. DITC I �? 6 �o _ SPRING BRANCH CREEK D.A. = 0. �� Ac. � I r- - - - - - #. - x , EXISTING BUILDING ENVELOPE I EXISTING BUILDING ENVELOPE X I EXISTING BUILDING ENVELOPE 100 JD -4� x} C -0.20 • I. �I I I I J I1�1 v EXIST CONC x !6 776 \0�h '997 0�6 LO, `11 h 00 90 >s X & 010 1y9 X X\ x x� • !s r� HEADWALL (ES -01) HEADWALL (ES -06) TOP ELEV.= 18.71 TOP ELEV.= 17.99 N. INV. EL= 13.49 (24" RCP) E. INV. EL= 12.13 (24" RCP) GRATE INLET (ES -02) C INLET (ES-07) 15.88 TOP ELEV.= 15.88 S. INV. EL= 11.50 (24" RCP) N. RIM ELEV.= 16.96 N. INV. EL = 11.53 (24' RCP) THROAT EL= 16.18 E. INV, EL= 12.69 (18" RCP) 29' X 45' ERCP W. INV. EL= 12.36 (24' RCP) END OF PIPE (ES -04) CURB INLET (ES -08) INV. = 8.97 N. RIM ELEV.= 17.11 OUTFALL CONTROL THROAT EL= 16.22 STRUCTURE (ES -03) W. INV. EL= 13.01 (18" RCP) TOP ELEV.= 15.23 HEADWALL (ES -09) TOP OF WEIR EL = 14.38 TOP ELEV.= 13.28 S.E. INV. EL= 7.64 (36" RCP) BOTTOM OF WEIR EL = 13.67 W. INV. EL = 14.36 (24' RCP) GRATE INLET (ES -05) OUTFALL CONTROL TOP ELEV.= 14.98 STRUCTURE (ES -10) S.E. INV. EL.= 9.39 (19 "x30" ERCP) TOP ELEV.= 14.32 S. INV. EL= 9.37 (24' RCP) N.W. INV. EL= 7.76 (36" RCP) N.W. INV. EL= 9.37 (29 "x45' ERCP) WEIR EL = 13.33 HEADWALL (ES -11) CURB INLET (ES -16) TOP ELEV.= 16.97 N. RIM ELEV.= 18.24 S.E. INV. EL= 11.94 (30" RCP) THROAT EL.= 17.33 - STORM SEWER MANHOLE (ES -12 l ) S. INV. EL = 13.34 (24" RCP) N. INV. EL = 13.29 (30" RCP) N. RIM ELEV.= 17.58 1329695,90 S. INV. EL. = 12.09 (30" RCP) CURB INLET (ES -17) N.W. INV. EL = 12.07 (30' RCP) N.E. INV, EL. IS UNOBTAINABLE (6' RCP) N. RIM ELEV.= 18.47 402669.69 THROAT EL.= 17.54 CURB INLET (ES -13) E. INV. EL = 13.94 (24" RCP) N. RIM ELEV.= 16.84 S. INV. EL. = 13.99 (24" RCP) THROAT EL= 15.76 N. INV. EL. = 13.93 (24' RCP) S. INV. EL. = 12.34 (30" RCP) N. INV. EL. = 12.33 (30" RCP) CURB INLET (ES -18) CURB INLET (ES -14) N. RIM ELEV.= 18.39 THROAT EL= 17.46 N. RIM ELEV.= 17.21 W. INV. EL = 14.36 (24' RCP) THROAT EL= 16.16 1329678.20 S. INV. EL. = 12.69 (30" RCP) JD N. INV, EL. = 12.66 (30" RCP) 1329669.90 MANHOLE (ES -15) JD N. RIM ELEV.= 18.10 1329669.52 N. INV. EL = 12.91 (30" RCP) JD S. INV. EL. = 12.91 (30" RCP) 1329678.04 1. EXISTING MULTI - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS HAVE BEEN REMOVED. 2. EXISTING ASPHALT PARKING SPACES BEYOND THE EXISTING ROADWAY CURB HAVE BEEN REMOVED. 3. PORTIONS OF THE EXISTING ROADWAY & CURB WITHIN THE PROPERTY BOUNDARY HAVE NOT BEEN REMOVED AND WILL BE UTILIZED FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT. X 9, / 7 x eti X X° 's X �o ps x 09 �l X� ?o 9 LOT 1 SUN VIEW (P.B. 117, PG. 48) X 1�lo 6 21• 1�o ! - - -_ �- --- - - -� -- - - -- 9�9,1�� yti:JD -S RETAINING WALL ,9_ x X X %5 _ 0 - EX. 10' UTILITY ESM'T. (O.RR. 9415, PG. 189) X,7 !� >s lesp %51 X' &9 X x�o�h x tix �1x '6 x 4s 17� 8 a ` ti ' JD- 16. X!7 / .. _'_= T = _'_ - �Z Ste= _ _ fir^ \10oti �� X ' '�! JD -7 - CENTERLINE OF \ I 6> �� , EX. 2 VALLEY GUTTER CURB !> ��. I > SPRINGTIME BRANCH b1x ✓�% °- 4b -EX. 7T -ASPH. PAVT. 5 '66 �!> 69 F� \ , 6 y X ' ,) X, ! >.-I � hx toL I I \1 LLJ 76 \a"'b �C /FC:17.14�� °?o ES -08 o�c = - - -_ _-= F� \ \\ I v1� =�JD -8 F� x !7� / L 16.89 ! - ~o� 7 17.50 X 17.1 c� 0 O - F� I ° / 1722 : TC ��� ` "13 a j� 40 20 0 40 SCALE IN FEET 1 " = 40' WETLAND TABLE POINT NORTHING EASTING JD 2 1329694,55 402623.37 JD 3 1329695,90 402653.29 JD 3A 1329694.22 402669.69 JD 4 1329696.43 402685.15 JD 5 1329688.77 402706.80 JD 6 1329678.46 402733.58 JD 7 1329678.20 402744.43 JD 8 1329669.90 402762.92 JD 9 1329669.52 402786.20 JD 10 1329678.04 402833.79 JD 11 1329684.27 402857.93 JD 12 1329684.93 402881.17 JD 13 1329699.79 402898.99 JD 14 1329714.86 402911.16 JD 15 1329727.70 402917.26 JD 16 1329717.94 402934,31 JD 17 1329716.96 402960.20 JD 18 1329744.05 402990.46 JD 19 1329786.80 403027.20 JD 20 1329809.95 403049.92 JD 21 1329845.58 403067.42 16.99:FL / �1' \10 0 o JD -9 m /� x x x x! X.9,s \1 x�'�h \ \�\ X \\ \�' I I'�p9 'r: A,SIN: PRE - SPRING \ ! \ J l ff / � �'e >� '� >7 !`�s7 'B90 �9� "'� - .ti��( \� ��' �l \1� 4J 1 � `2 - %� - m I x, /�/ 1b�� 1/ / (� x`�' \��`" \\ 11 9 �� ' ?'s - - r 11 JJiA• - Oi V �A ci 9 m W I �` � •� Al I I \ \ x� F 1,.80 X N >> ':>06' 1 N i I �► C 0.20 \ 9 EXISTING BUILDING ENVELOPE \ • I J X D -1 0 ,9 I I\ I I p i l ►A11 \I I �- I I \I ti oti a � I I I \ \ ►' , T ,, I 8 \��` I \1. �! , i i; WELAND AREA ► X 17.99 \0' � x AREA = 0.19Ac. 411 I 1 BASIN. . P, -POND 1 II I1 0h 69a a Ix x! I III \1��hE`II I ! D.A. 4.45Ac. �X x�',h s °sT l �\ II 1 JD -12 FL �p 9 ` I 1 9 \ o )rL 00.! 9p O, I ! X > \ \'� �,I it = sr ►i - - o I - I III I III X ox �,D -13 �1 .p: = �1.of :s i I Il W x \� - Icy �; \ / 9, \ ti%� wl III III I � i _ I J �� li,/ SXI/ I X I I \ I I x x,9� • 1 ' JD-14� 0o v I x` W !s x X, 9 1 1 JD -15 v° ���.1;I I o� I ,9o, aI z 17> 000 h �' x i o Lj Z I III IN I I N I \ \ I z x'96 I I a I i W X�o� �� \�.� \\ o X! - X� oo �h 1� �h ^� 9\ y x JD 17 7s a ? QS \0. \a \� \ O`0 6 16.63 c� I.ZOI I I r I x,9 I I oss \.b X \ �^ \ X \ �� 0�\ \��,C Q,, "�' \'.� 16.60 9 w I II I II III g X I I x \ \�� 7W, '!63 > w X O 9 1G 0 \ X X , 6 m X�ps xti °x F� \� \\ ho \ \ \JD- x 1j WETLAND JURISDIC7(ONAL >.pg �( ' >s f, F y o \ \ \ 0. / �1. LINE & EX. TOP OF BANK % y III I tia 0 \ G \0. \\ \� \ o �\ ' SPRING BRANCH CREEK O` X� 4i \, -1 - _ m is a x �o tih oo\ o �, \\ ��.�� x o �\ x \�� / , �`ti }.c I ti Itl I I II x,J I 96� x�o. X� ti, \� v, + \% ,% yl I I I 6 I Ii X x x \ \ \\ \\ \ \ JD -'1 OHW23 o r4, 's9 o I L _ X -O I I II x \ \ g '�> ! k`� ELEV - 2.87I� I DI �`� s \O �o - of �� , D` \ sX !7 \ �':nx I j �pq 'EA > \ --C- Z EX. f31ESM'T. "2 R. 5404, PG. 1946) I II °x JD 20' a r� 1 k 1\75 X / ` FL: 17.7 \\ �\' \ �;a E x LIP Qg 9s x ! ,>,x 17.7 :TC o x, \ s \ b1h o ! I ( I 7 I l,• ,�--� I s X,9 X!9 ti0 ?° X, x !7� 11.5 FL G gip! \\ X!7 X \�11 j 0'b 0y0 j 69 •69' \1 ,9� 96 96y \0 sx ll, \\ >7 \ \X h �y 1 I.J ° �o I II oh \ado' ��._ -•_• -._ �_'___•_�'____'_- �____'_- � ,� ! \ y6, \0. n� ,`c, � -'- - � ',� �' l l / > � b •o h '96' \` is I o I I�O. \�0 !9 oe F� 1ti F\ b`�' .F\ \\ C! !� c,> 7 ✓1 ?��( \1� 1 p \\b tai' ` \ 1 X'd 1 I 1`O pY 0 X X d X >> 6 0 \ 6s - \g' \b h y \a'' ...I I .� 9� R1,SI1:� ARED 2 7�p 11� .\ X \ ES -,0 1111 II 7. lid= - '�C =�'' -.- -= •fir==---- �_. - - - -- - �(_._• - - -- r � 00 1 , 'L \• 1 c3 �> X X �' 2• ' > 1 .24 6� �f X X \ ' `' k h� \ ' \1, , .s, \ 7 - I m I �O I I '/9 '/ '/� till 1I!. 'i L�.�� cI l '/d l 7 \� b0� / h - - ~� 6 O �! I I a f !� . p7 'n !�� °6 ��� '6, '�✓ �6 ' h \ \1. { _>s9� \0� { I X EX /SyT. S�ORYWA T. !6� o� X (;6 $ ' s= °� s X \�b I I' I I I DENT /ON PON .os W I I '9s� X�p x - .54 \�y� I \1� \f �c,�� ?66 X,? ES -,9 , p x x •O7 x x x �oI x x ao' . �° b b I C y S> ! X ! O ! �' 6 ? b O I POND#2 I I �•, 9s � '967 /g 9'•i � ai I I \ ' \C, BO \� \0ti !,9 !y `9! /69 01, \h .\O• I I II - - - - \ sxb- W ONE STY. C.B.S. I I I X� II �I I- \ II 1° ��`�I \�9 \"�1� b1 ! " I `o (,!� RES. 111 1836 I I I \01h b X,9 ,j �d„ ! >� > °\ X I o' • \ �1� I I t� \ �5ss EXISTING BUILDING ENVELOPE '° 7 °9s I I I�F✓ x` Fv�aSn I I I EXISTING BUILDING ENVELOPE I I I I ,> I I ES -11 16 Iv>' ls�6�p s \�. 0�9 x \kph q`1. 9 L J s9 07 I G` h � -X - '9 �< �C J lj IX , I I o o I ZC' 6 CLF !y ! !� 9 .' ''� I FS \��' e9 \0 >! I I \o \h x x X oT 7 �� 6 -_ �p X X x \ bti 9F I \0' I 0 z ', x % 0 z FCY 4'14 b �\ F:%6531, 5 u � OF �(o�a`�`oeneiF tiQ' -r - - ,- -� -h - 0- 01 >, sI N HFw , �1 , °p EXs O' DRAT GE &UTILITY ESM T. 0 PG. 2350 1 ,y t �, orr O b ti Il ^� ur arse . un orF ! P8 it7, PG �8 N 0'07;27 W 364,65;R I' ;' \q. 10 9 7 a �6 ( ) 1 1 q \h• 0 rrj �� of GTE O 1 = 1 �s IG Alf 1 � 1 80'07 02 "W 364.58 M \0• • . If�DO'07'27 "W 1057.22' o,- o, s s xa1 e/w uNe OF eEttY LANE X. - - - h - _ - - - 9 - - - - - _ - - - - ^P \f \ \�, �`r�- - =�� r - e-�� �. k - - - --_T _1=---- =fir - -= o c, \� \ > !9 j \1' �' fOEX, 2' VALLEY GUTTER CUR c, E ES 17 ES -16 X. 26' ASPH. PAV'T. c, \1 NCB •"� �\ 9 - -USX- 6 - hti ,Yc- 7 - n�'fl. u� �b - �E! �'T - x >� x! s v Noo'08'18 "W z M ��. ,o \01 \�. 'ds� '7j7 7•,6 P.O.0 858.00'° 7I N. BETTY LANE . -- ES -18 SECTION 3 -29 -15 EASTERLY LINE OF SECTION 3 -29-15 60' R/W (NOT FND. OR SET) h0 o`. \ -- 4 \\�< -y -- iX, -- -5� -' -? j- e9'wf• -Bl� .%f c,> ES -14 &I X `'- s >sy s 'saw - y0 690 666 z H o z O W ° W W ri m 40 W oC OD W Ii fQ tOJ OODD • � E to W W .: M ■ v W Z Z M Z II-nn V g � N y Z o a U) a W e > a �s � f (off L6 > O N cd - V _ W :1 W O W Z Lo r- !• M W 0 Q y v � o Z L0 0 w W U N 40 W oC m W �� fQ tOJ f. • � E to � W M C W Z M �rn -rn S�a3 Ow- a=io`Ln N y Ti W U) > oo M z N > ) o W � f (off M N Aff O 16 Ix w OZ 00 N W O O O OOO N, LLI ui �0- Q Y r � r in m m ZU' Y 0 a U F. I ai V W oC 0 W �IL f. � IL In W C W V 0 N y W W U) > > Q W � pZ w Q W :1 W Hy Lo F. I ai V W oC 0 L c 0 V •.fir h:� --� Cl. (o 0 �� �1• z 00 f. C In W C W Z N V •.fir h:� --� Cl. (o 0 �� �1• THIS PROJECT LIES WITHIN FLOOD ZONES "X" AND AE (B.F.E. = 11) AS DEPICTED ON FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP, COMMUNITY NUMBER #125096 (MAP NUMBER 12103C 0106H), REVISED MAY 17, 2005. WATER SUPPLY WELL NOTE: PURSUANT TO SWFWMD B.O.R. - CHAPTER 5, SECTION 5.3 THERE CAN BE NO WATER SUPPLY WELLS LOCATED WITHIN 100.0 FEET OF A STORMWATER FACILITY. WETLAND TABLE DRY POND No. I JD 2 1329694.55 402623.37 T.O.B. EL. = 16.00 JD 3 1329695.90 402653.29 D.L.W. EL. = 14.50 JD 4A 1329696.43 402685.5 illy D.H.W EL.(25)= 15.00 JD 5 1329688.77 402706.80 BOTT EL. = 13.00 JD 6 1329678.46 402733.58 JD 7 1329678.20 402744.43 P/NELAND DRl VE JD 8 1329669.90 402762.92 60' RIW Ix I >> JD 9 1329669.52 402786.20 \"Y !, JD 10 1329678.04 402833.79 40 20 0 40 Jp pB JD 11 1329684.27 402857.93 �. \o•. ! x` sX X, \�. a• \a \^� JD 12 132968.4.93 402881.17 !6 x y^i J6 x 'six '�9 Xv EX. ASPH. PAV'T. '> X' J> A XQ`' v1, �,!> X tit °'? 6 X S9 - ?'' EDP , ° ( 68 s ?'" `1 `�° '�' - ''� - °� a -- -'�` h \ a s'` JD 13 1329699.79 402898.96 SCALE IN FEET ,�- • ; - X . -- .__._,4 J 0h Js, s� !ss \a �,° DITCH \"� kti� ES -04 F° h o ,f� 0• O• 1� '4c \,� X. -� x/> >� �\ ,, �� ss \h. 6 X , X ! 1,. x X JD 14 1329714.86 402911.16 ' \�\ ,, ,> X ' �� ✓ \1ti \� X \o' x x s x/ Js x P PXl 0 a \x ^o �,� _ _ c_��0 1 = 40 \h• 2� •9p EX. DITCH h ?°' T7,-. si �� `� ,�o`� \ °h° ,� !�6 DITCH Ars ✓�� �°� DRA91� �� & �, !i ,06 " JD 15 1329727.70 402917.26 h �i .L -�--- -- OE / o / JD 16 1329717.94 402934.31 TREE LEGEND x 6 ,' _� k e��o`�' '� °`"',- TILITY SM'T. \tit° �px,., \ti t' JD 17 1329716.96 402960.20 B 0�° \'o�'� . , / rn !S >> A� \ ter- J - b• X x \�y; n 9p 'd9 ° sp R� �E- /s -�� ` ES- �a `` _ JD 18 1329744.05 402990.46 00 /0 R TREE DIAMETER /CANOPY RADIUS ` 1 9 JD 19 1329786.80 403027.20 $WEETGUM e, ! >0 1 ' \1yh \1�0 's� h o� 1 7' `;_ JD 20 1329809.95 403049.92 O OAK \ °ti • :1=. ,'E:.;x s 1 6 !� - _ t w N ;�. �`� / / JD -2 JD 21 1329845.58 403067.42 • CHERRY LAUREL e HOLLY -0 caw �.� / /// :::: - - ---� - ! n ¢ .' / / / / WETLAND BUFFER 1 `• ' / \0 0 EL. = 137 s o ? PALM MAPLE �> N ,, a - �� r / / COMPENSATION AREA '' a / / AREA = 786 S.� E7 PINE 0 SYCAMORE '> x x ,� \ _ T.0.6. L. = 16.0 y s �� �- / /// 9 .:.:::.::.:. lr. \ x - - -� ' - JD- �l ■ CAMPHOR • WILLOW - -z - � ter- - � `� x X X \o \� 15 12 11 x go/ / / / WETLAND JURISDICTIONAL MIMOSA HERMOSA !6 1- 16 x, x x 'I':.I '9 \o' x 14 13 x! ''' MAGNOLIA UNKNOWN s� \ s> 96! p J9 s6 !9 9, e°' �; ; /JD =aAr LINE & EX. TOP OF ,BANK °6 J :'''. I / 6 i``:l SPRING BRANCH CREEK /17 PROP. DRAT GE x • D EASEMENT °' I • x JD'-4l j�9 �tii / ", / EXIST. CONC. 51 50 49 °�ti = Q 1 0 �✓ ^� JD -5 RETAINING WALL x! --. - - .�`'�••' � - X - - x • o^"' /s Al / / TO REMAIN X66 e 9 0 \°+ hti EX. ' UTILITY E 'T. (0 4, PG. 8 I 's x ` x x 0� _-- 96 �O \�, s s> �S B9p / l X va O� X -_ 1 169 - 18 PROP. 15_SEWER E� \0 ,. -. I_- J6 °p - - - _ - :: �r ! �O/ / CENTERLINE OF ! s X �> v ` i� ! �' 0�' A. 2 V LEY GUTTER CURB ! x /'I (" SPRINGTIME BRANCH 6p . , X. P T � •6 > ' ° ' ��PROP. DRAINAGE � � � � � x!9 x \° x! x •�� ,s& UTILITY I �a JsJ' fo > 'f ES- 08rc -- -19� - ♦ - \. °\ \�. oti /.% 25 WETLAND I7.I4� .•� !�D -8 t.; BUFFER LINE 9 9, �o� EASEMENT ! FL. > i - - _ - - - - \ p / / s x 9p� 6 19 i c 4• G .$ ?gip �� 1 7 0 +. �•• �.: ,.o. �:ti•. EXISTING STORM STRUCTURE TABLE x x 5 :TC - - - - - JspO �y 0 \Z0� 's�9 I 1 9 f .99: EL 4 c `�� r I \ X \� \� "< \ ' O °'x /, / - x -,! /.. /� X I X X ,9 \ _. \ �':\ ` >9, , BASIN: POST CREEK HEADWALL (ES -01) HEADWALL (ES -06) HEADWALL (ES -11) , J x� .•. \ \ TOP ELEV. 18.71 TOP ELEV.= 17.99 TOP ELEV.= 16.97 / / '�> '� '� '& s N. INV. EL= 13.49 (24' RCP) E. INV. EL= 12.13 (24" RCP) S.E. INV. EL.= 11.94 (30" RCP) CURB INLET (ES -16) '6> I tir/ TACT B 9° I 9� \�Y' / / - �'JQ TO BE REMOVED TO BE REMOVED N. RIM ELEV.= 18.24 ./ \�? �,� / I X t. \\ \ :�• �,r / / / V_ tt D.A. - 0 (7 AL'. STORK SEWER MANHOLE ES -12 �o � \�• � ( ) ( ) ( ) THROAT EL= 17.33 TOT L T t \ 1 %� GRATE INLET ES -02 CURB INLET ES -07 N. RIM ELEV.= 17.58 S. INV. EL = 13.34 (24' RCP) Xy� x ., I p 11 So 1800 9 1 _ TOP ELEV.= 15.88 N. RIM ELEV.= 16.96 S. INV. EL = 12.09 (30' RCP) N. INV. EL = 13.29 (30' RCP) '9p! `0 S. INV. EL= 11.50 (24' RCP) THROAT EL.= 16.18 N.W. INV. EL = 12.07 (30" RCP) �p N X 41 " o • N. INV. EL = 11.53 (24" RCP) E. INV. EL= 12.69 (18' RCP) N.E INV. EL. IS UNOBTAINABLE (6" RCP) CURB INLET (ES -17) a \° I I ;: '9�? I I I x� `� 1 II'1» CT I �,`/ / / J W. INV. EL= 12.36 (24" RCP) CURB INLET (ES -13) N. RIM ELEV.= 18.47 \a I 9 . WETLAND BUFFED 29 X 45 ERCP CONNECT 18" RCP N. RIM ELEV.= 16.84 THROAT EL= 17.54 END OF PIPE (ES -04) THROAT EL= 15.76 E. INV. EL. = 13.94 (24' RCP) I , r �. / �g0/ COMPENSATION AREA INV. = 8.97 TO INLET @ I.E. 13.09 o I , I I .* x�p I \0. F, a. X s9 ` S. INV. EL = 12.34 30' RCP S. INV. EL = 13.99 (24" RCP) AREA = 859 S.F: CURB INLET (ES -OS) N. INV. EL. = 12.33 �30" RCP; N. INV. EL = 13.93 (24' RCP) 20 / >6 8.r I I I O, 42 `� I I I 98 b` ��9 / D -11, o `°' ' ' •� / /�/ #; NOTE: OUTFACE CONTROL N. RIM ELEV.= 17.11 oti op � •F I , I .• I h:. � . STRUCTURE (ES -03) THROAT EL= 16.22 CURBNLET1(2S -14) NUR B ELECv- �18E9-18) x 6I�c x I I I I I I��, ` / / TOP ELEV.= 15.23 W. INV. EL= 13.01 (18" RCP) I I I I 40 X \h , I .\ 1 I / / / / yY 'i, „ THROAT EL: 16.16 THROAT EL.= 17.46 � < I �• �,o \o• \ � �.. ., CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT TO ENGINEER OF RECORD CONNECT 18 RCP S. INV. EL. = 12.69 (30" RCP W. INV. EL. = 14.36 24" RCP I X r ,� I \0 / / / / JD -12 r. -'7�3, A DEWATERING PLAN PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK. TOP OF WEIR EL = 14.38 ) ( ) cd I of \O• 1 �!> / / ,� o, T �� •, BOTTOM OF WEIR EL = 13.67 TO INLET aG� I.E. 14.27 N. INV. EL. = 12.66 (30" RCP) I I I I I I r� X x,9 x \ �. ,o' �t�,y;,kE,�� „,, FAILURE TO MAINTAIN EROSION PROTECTION AND PLUG WEST INVERT I �� 1 `6 1 I ^� a, M / / / D -13 V. r .�::. �•U) DISCHARGE TURBIDITY LEVELS IN ACCORDANCE WITH GRATE INLET (ES -05) MANHOLE (ES -15) 21 I I I I '� I \ °. ,. l y�=d, ;, � � / / / /� > *, PERMIT CONDITIONS WILL RESULT IN ENFORCEMENT �i X J� / ' , , ,ti, , , INSTALL STAKED . ACTION BY THE SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER TOP ELEV.= 14.98 HEADWALL (ES-O9) N. RIM ELEV.= 18.10 I ,� i . +\ " / �ti N. INV. EL = 12.91 (30" RCP) / ;3 SILT SCREEN MANAGEMENT DISTRICT. S.E. INV. EL= 9.39 (19'x30' ERCP) TOP ELEV.= 13.28 S INV. EL = 12.91 (30" RCP) � °� L I r ` ' • OND x p9 • •:• 1 / � 6 ' / / % � / 1 � '>�. S. INV. EL= 9.37 (24" RCP} S.E. INV. EL= 7.64 (36" RCP) N.W. INV. EL= 9.37 (29'x45' ERCP) X OUTFACE CONTROL �qJ �F I \F\ p� a� - \ ' . J[S 1 FENCE TYP.) STRUCTURE (ES -10) s I I I :, X, Ac'• E SM�Xi \ �°� o� 000000 x� � � / / / t`; WETLAND BUFFER DEFICIT TOP ELEV.= 14.32 • • G E � ''' AREA -. 1,474 S.F. N.W. INV. EL= 7.76 36" RCP I I I / DRAINP i \' �"" \°�' / , D -1 + WEIR EL = 13.33 ( ) 22 I I I I `TROP' �� +° '" \ ` 4C, X / / n +. x WETLANQAREA A �o ,9 ""` �` \ 18.0 `'� 1 ss I I 4 0 \ \�' x AREA '.0.19 Ac. �o, ° X \ X \ G,���'\ \ / r 16.63 X h�c� I °+ I I \�\ i;, \ �; V I I I I I J6 6 16� .s6s 0 LEGEND 15' WTLAND x 5 9 > OBUFFER x x JD -fi` WETLAND JURISDICTONAL DENOTES WETLAND BUFFER AREA ° h LINE & EX. TOP O y BANK p > I I< •� \° \ \ \ / , / SPRING BRANCH CREEK /?,?g ��>° a BOUNDARY LINE !6 s9 I x, I `� ti °' �`° ' o' ' STAKED SILT FENCE 23 I I > o °\ 37 o`° � \ ��;� o '\ e� o / � � �' -I = �� � �` ALLOWED 15' WETLAND I 45 �\ �s p� (� _ n n n �a I I , I ! II I x� lh �` �p 2p x� \\ .4� X`' J\ x\0 4 \t \ •_ / / / fir. �\ -+I �W W D DOUBLE ROW STAKED SILT FENCE x� 3r: I /a I fl t° �O �l \ ^',1 r'� BUFFFER ADJACENT TO rl Fl WHERE WETLAND BUFFER IS < 15' °.9 I ' x x x C / / / xI x EXIST. STORMWATER ( _ ) �- 21,p I X I I w : \\ \\ JD- OHW2 0 !6 ' / / �T'6 '9s DETENTION POND FLOATING TURBIDITY BARRIER I � \o p ? I !9 I m POND #3 �o a \x o� ,x �, , / ELEV - 2.87 II I ,bps, �y \ I �' z\ \ \ \' / / ,x Ex. L ESM'T. "2 �(a.R. 5404, PG. 946) I I I 46 0 ' \ omA = AREA DRAINING INTO STRUCTURE (AC) I I ~ \\ 6 ^' .X 0 _ Q - TOTAL RUN -OFF ENTERING STRUCTURE (CFS) I PROP. • \\ �� ,, \�. `•� \ TC..,; 24 I 'i3',AO� :} I 8 DRAINAGE DRAINAGE BASIN BOUNDARY X�? 'O o B I I I I / 6•6 !6 J s � I ESM T. •� \ J9 ';� i7 5 :< ! `�� \•• '\s FL:t�7. G `s;> J \ .. ~ e � 1 / \� � � ��•• `.E :. 21` H N j � x lS !X x + SUB -BASIN BOUNDARY ,9 96 oa 196p z ! 690 Z --0 - -EXISTING STRUCTURES I 47 35 TR � q� x25 Q � � \ PROPOSED DRAINAGE STRUCTURES t \v X X ^-- SURFACE WATER FLOW I °1 J UTIL M T. xl 2 x \\ ES -10 1 o x �! \ \ !� 99 s 9i BB> 1 _gyp ~, b� x X F� °a y\ / l\y 100 TIME OF CONCENTRATION 6 �q �o> X� > I I ter° r�, �, O• �� r lc. �\ 1 tia k \`1 �`' �' FLOW PATH 9'Xd I !,•j�9 !. iJ�9 Ci'� ! ' a° 6' Cx J 26 e9 rn �> �� J�o�J ah I EXIST. SORMWA IEF T !6� III / N p� -- -- RIGHT OF WAY LINE I ����ti x�9 J99 S s� P p I x X D ENT /ON P p x X h 1 �\ v o 6 x ES-19 ` - •- •- •- •- •- •- •- •- • -• -• -- WETLAND RI '9 x `a ':. \�' �. ,''I 6' !� / JU SDICTION LINE s s> ! x x x b° /4s a o ------------ - - - - -- 89j ��p 96� .` /9 / ! 91 16' 01 \co. ' \�. O • b a POND � '�' WETLAND BUFFER LINE I I �i �� si �^� ,x�x 9p4'avo �' ? X \ I �� "I' J LEI! \� °9`'x 27 X \e S ti35° �> - • co ES -11 Q �' 09 �lss ?O6'� J * �,, �p �p I I I �°' I ��,b �o 34 hX I '69 � I �c r> eO (� �� 01 S \�' c�a r: ` \�. 2 x ° \01 I s. gbh w �o°' I do �a �p �o• X x c� \� ati �. $. x x /,0" x! c �e 11; s_'� I I \�• ..' 1 28 2 30 - - - - 9 - x 9 - >� I! -- I X P. 0 TiLI T t �1 \��° L- I '9 \� / EXv 0' DRAIyAGE dt UT1u ESM'T. (0 531, PG. 23 0) �� 0` a ti0 J •; - - - _ i \ 6 / v / °� ae GTE- 0 1 J> GIA� 1 11 \°, 6 6 / B \ 0 b \0 p �i 1 0• \ EX. 5 W J , • < E . S W h"� \ ti \ ' ; :.::: ° !> \ti EX 5 W - - B X 77 lc ��O ��`r-- -�\�F� - - �a -x,� -- oho \'^� - -- 16.91 \�, -- - -- _ !> > aJe J o,. , o,. l 1G 1� 1614 •RR > -- •1S�yc��p- \ �E: p '�• j `Sj - -z� - �Ca /�- ��t )C- -- - -- �C - -- - - �� - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - L- - - - O ro °� - \o >> 1` r - !6 > /� \ °° f r EX. 2' VALLEY GUTTER r� /c >� \1 tc ES -14 fc. 's, \O F !6 t = r 2. i6 \ o• �\ a5 F\ ES -17 6 J9 Q. J > \� ES -16 �. !. !> EX. 26' ASPH. VT. �. '!> �j. ,> ! ., , o,. `� ' ES -13 - - - c c c c !� 6j \�� �b \0 !6 �6 !> 90 �'> , d' Jj •66 /, sp !, • 7p �,6 iii �,6 �iJ \0��0 \ �,6 6�� 596 !, i X s \ O 6 o > o O 1 ES -12 ! !! J/ \ ! .0' X J \�' X 9 X > X .> > X o X si X ip X �6 x 96 66 \`o X X .,p x 8� \ X SS 6 SS s 616 X96 >p pp s9p 666 6p6 \01 POND No. 3 N. BETTY LANE ES -18 T.O.B. EL. = 17.50 60' R/W D.L.W. EL. = 16.40 D.H.W EL. (25)= 17.00 BOTT EL. = 15.50 e WARNING ABOVE GROUND OR UNDERGROUND UTILITIES MAY BE IN THE AREA OF THIS PROJECT - PROCEED WITH CAUTION. CONTRACTOR IS TO CALL THE SUNSHINE STATE ONE CALL AT (1- 800 - 432 -4770) AND LOCAL POWER COMPANY 48 HOURS BEFORE BEGINNING WORK. CONTRACTOR TO PROTECT ALL EXISTING UTILITIES IN THE AREAS OF CONSTRUCTION. , I z H o Z O ° N W w w W 0Z m0 m = 3 o w rno)rn •� E H a m a N1 ayY _ � Or^v, z^^� 3-1UJ UJ .� a Go Oa- ao� 4. O ago UdN W .: dLJi ■ V W Z �° z Z IaInn o Cl V Z C2 a 3 a AF W 0 o Z a a ~ ~ LL. '> o `�' Vj x W Z a M W � v U) n > 0C, L M > > Lu oQ V N y w .O v � F- w 3 Q �d• d N O 06 w w W 0Z m0 m = 3 a w rno)rn •� E H a 0 a N1 ayY _ � Or^v, z^^� 3-1UJ UJ .� a W0 Oa- ao� 4. O Q> a: UdN N dLJi • �° z v0 • Cl M • H AF 000 O 06 o 0 Z In c W O W Z H w w W 0Z m0 m a w rno)rn a 0 0 N1 ayY _ � w,o•' 3-1UJ UJ W0 UdN dLJi w Ii Y mmm z Y 000 o 0 Z In c W O W Z H W m a a WZ Z W0 v>> oa Z W m J `�' Vj ~ W' U) > 0C, O;��`, V y O 0C d o 0 Z In c W O W Z H THIS PROJECT LIES WITHIN FLOOD ZONES "X" AND AE (B.F.E. = 11) AS DEPICTED ON FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP, COMMUNITY NUMBER #125096 (MAP NUMBER 12103C 0106H), REVISED MAY 17, 2005. 2(N EXIST. POWER POLE -,--\ - N0. 7 FOR POND NO. 7 FOR POND'," BE PLACED AT EX� TOP OF 402744.43 TO BE RELOCATED BE SELECTED BY OWNER CONST. SANDBAG P NET AND DRIVE CROSS SECTION w JD 8 1329669.90 402762.92 CROSS SECTION • >, BANK TO PROTECT EE 39 BEGIN 6 HIGH CEMENT RIPRAP THE CANOPY , � "P1 B -P1 B" �° # JD 9 1329669.52 402786.20 - - - - ' VINYL A CE L� ASH ^PAD \y / �� /W - Ek. 6" PVC WM -a1- _ \> „PIA -P1 A" ,J�s \A JD 10 1329678.04 402833.79 40 20 0 40 BY OTHERS (P) END 6 HIGH JD 11 1329684.27 402857.93 EX. 6 PVC WM SP - �i' 'm mri - ---es� W�- W6d -[�- WM "�' / i Jo X �- W"'- ""`t -."�' "�"' ,\ - ` dp" \1 \1 �' \�' J.S X ti� 0ti X hh x `'�� '�> VINYL FENCE JD 12 1329684.93 402881.17 1•, h > X sX \� - .� ,� .. X X, .. .,. a• \a'- \'� `J t'a X h ^� J J s• • \ ',sx �,sX 61 EOP �'� °X (EX. ASPH. PAVT.)'��x' �� A '� ��' ? �'� Ai "'�1 '�'. .- -J�-iE "--�C °-'�- --� - - ° o JD 13 1329699.79 402898.99 SCALE IN FEET -- `• h rs s� Js \a' h° DITCH \"� 1 •ES-04 �r > \ r ° ° - a x- s - `` ' /2o.1r x \ - 1 = 40 �4- -� X- �- X� ,> _ = �1 - 0 , - X�� - X \ ' k M JD 14 1329714.86 402911.16 �, \� \ \x�x s J> 1 -T hi, x sy ✓ ti `1 X \`° X - « X s DITCH 'J ss z4' /ze'R pR(�pJ�O a` • /2s'R 's 6 JD 15 1329727.70 402917,26 i \�� S -20 90 EX. DITCH h10 \1' '\� S/ �� 5 -14 \hOh \6h J6� ? : �j _`24'/40'R 0 0 24•/31'R -• . _� l ? \ , r6 7•/12'R 8' /8'R h, r �- -�f��- ._ \ DRAIf� & 21./3o,R 10 1 !9 O o JD 16 1329717.94 402934.31 / X �I s _ �� B ^ 1 °, -- EXIST. HEADW L \ °���`�' a J,> '��, rill, °�� TILIT- YF9 M'T. a ��Xx{ \�'�a '■ o>> /RO / TREE LEGEND qg, /1o'R JD 17 1329716.96 402960.20 oa �a J6 y O� �6 $ 1 Jy J� 60 \�' \ u�0 BE REMOVED UG '� ° uc-/ uc \ ES- 1a �`' y •R 8 /zo'R JD 18 1329744.05 402990.46 00 /0 R TREE DIAMETER CANOPY RADIUS \� V t5' /2a'R \1 ����' 1 ' ° 99 Pl �' JD- - %r JD 19 1329786.80 403027.20 OAK / SWEETGUM -�E-`' h J a/t2 ti / // 17 8 O tie X 6 •�. , ' ': • 6 � � � .. ° ,, Va ? ' J .� : • :' ,. \1 RAINAGE E SEMENT 66 I SE N , - '� O \`��, Jb' 2 'y \ 0'R o _ \° S -11 ? �j W t; JD 21 1329845,58 403067.42 • CHERRY LAUREL e HOLLY Ix L, c /40R 11 /12'x' t. s.. \ - \ 16 J _ - - - 4• /5'R 1i Q \�. / / / / WETLAND BUFFER • PALM MAPLE >ss Ak S -12 EXIST. HEADWALL 9> iv ' >, I' 4o'R Q COMPENSATION AREA O PINE 18•/24'R 0 0 •/, '� TO BE REMOVED /14'R = / a / AREA = 786 S.F,. SYCAMORE >> Js 1 _ T.O.B. L. 16.0 �,+ 'R \ 6 F.F.E. - _ ? ? \ E -' °:- 4• 24'/35'R ■ hx _ ,s'�ea- -sue �-� / Jo -3 CAMPHOR • WILLOW 2 =�F6�j F.F.E. 5 \� � • ' o-'- WETLAND JURISDICTIONAL 10 MIMOSA 0 HERMOSA x 6 X 20.13 F.F.E. _:.:,::;: •.:;: x,9 1 X 14 13 xJ 2 ~ 1 1 ^ $ -21 ��x1D =3A� LINE & EX. TOP OF BANK J9 O v, 0°' ; A / 3 CONST. 12.0 L.F \ /r,� / / / SPRING BRANCH CREEK MAGNOLIA UNKNOWN 17.9 1 9 i 1 g 6 t� /20.5 J :..:.. B e °> 1 A A A > \a"'1 6" PVC (NON -PERF) .S 20 _ X17 F F EZ•y W 8� 8�3 18.5 18.6 ,� o.` ®o oo� /, /Jd -4 LEGEND 79 19.9 / 9.8 19. 1 w tl II M II M w"� X \ , 8 / 6 P\VC (PERF) ' ��' / {� e4 / BOUNDARY LINE /> >ss s P�• o Q I w' Wq / w� �7 / FF Y, /U.D. a' 9 • .... WETLAND JURISDICTIONAL LINE Is' 21R 6 EXIST, CONC. j / / / c" W 51 0 9' / 49 p J9 z �� g �9F 9✓ \ RETAINING WALL x,6 '9-= ``'• - a x ``� `` x x `` X ; �s ° 1 x x ��� A 4/ / JD -5 TO REMAIN PROPOSED STORM SEWER -'9 %g6 \ ° E . TQ` T. (0 G. . t ` 1olto , >s _ . 'T 23 e e9° I '9 ya °�� ,> K to / Ex CSir DITCH 3-10 o I8 1 ,n7+� 9 `• / / �� F / / / <; PROPOSED STAKED SILT FENCE Cs) PROP - C� Mt ANAL �' z'R t o >, ' - - - P - - - - - 71- 9 , JD -6 1, (DOUBLE ROW ADJACENT TO WETLANDS) � � TO E FILLED ° � _ � '�; . ` ... ` J� o s r s °'' \ 0� , 6h' EX. 7 EEIC GU�ER URB c'- 1� s x /gip! CENTERLINE OF (36'R L.F.) \ e> 4 ' I Q'�� /.: �?r J, �. •, \ TRANS. SPRINGTIME BRANCH DENOTES WETLAND BUFFER AREA 1 24•/43'R > 5• R \0 \ / !6/ S 06 X EX. T. J r z$ 6 �d 10 9 i PROP. RAINAW� �'� • r6 y6 9 >> J> J >,` \^� ° �i 25 WETLAND I \°+' Q 24 " /35'R I ° 1 I •� lj r , .I "Tp 9+� �� \� \�' 9 x, x x I x' ,,& UTILITY ^,a 1114'6-OD �' ES -08 oQ, rc - - - �� / / F D -s BUFFER LINE DENOTES LIMITS OF PAVEMENT Pis \ 010-/21.5'R ?os f y4SEMENT rte/ ,2 J FL: 16.8 - - - `� - - - - X- - - - S ' �cP J&A� &CURB REMOVAL / X 1 7 4 s / 17.50 9 / / .. :i•, ;. .,,., ` °� 'ap / \ r X I 1 g +��y' 17 22: 0" \1 \ ' a t^ >> v �j.O��ON 'ss tss9 \1� 3 \1' 1 '' a 'r'' /� �' S -12 STORM STRUCTURE NUMBER >z�fos'R1 9 / /r • //� / t; / I I ♦'ts/74R C0NS1:, .0 \L� \ \ \° a'� �� J /� , , P -� J� 6 PVC (N-CIN -PERF \ J6 h x r- -f` I/ �,�zi �A 9'/23' l / e >� '�,� e ,4 $ \ �, \ ,�� 9`' /w / PROPOSED INLET LOCATION ' 'e> T"18 \ \��� / / 11 27'9 PROPOSED GRADE EXISTING STORM STRUCTURE TABLE `� �o cc \1 °��dV • z4$% - �_ x> x 1s I r c� \1 Al (� F .�' 3 \ B C,,�^ I 18" t 'IR ` 1 \0� 18 �8p� x J 9 TOT LQT 1\ 1 ° 1 ? / /\ t•. �- DRAINAGE FLOW ARROW HEADWALL (ES -01) HEADWALL (ES -06) HEADWALL (ES -11) 9g �4� 1t)r%19R ':' J �g,2 I �' 11- S �x F • �1 �ti p` '> / / / / \- N $. 0 SWALE FLOW ARROW TOP ELEV.= 18.71 TOP ELEV.= 17.99 TOP ELEV.= 16.97 t O > h a�` ; X / 41 19 • \ ��o N. INV. EL= 13.49 (24' RCP) E. INV. EL= 12.13 (24' RCP) S.E. INV, EL= 11.94 (30' RCP) CURB INLET (ES -16) a �� I \ . I � I I � � x �� 5 1�ACT I rx �\ / , / / J o F.F.E. FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION N. RIM ELEV,= 18.24 TO BE REMOVED TO BE REMOVED STORM SEWER MANHOLE ES -12 INSTALL STAKED \�1 I '. I 6 �,� ��9 "A" F F E �1 \\ , , \ WETLAND BUFFER ( ) THROAT EL= 17.33 5 O 1• o N. RIM ELEV.= 17.58 S. INV, EL = 13.34 24' RCP SILT SCREEN `° I I 1$ 9 �x r �' .�� ` \ / �y 0/ t•:, COMPENSATION AREA A DENOTES LOT GRADING TYPE GRATE INLET (ES -02) CURB INLET (ES -07) ) II M x I 0 0° s9 \ \\ S. INV. EL. = 12.09 (30' RCP) N. INV. EL = 13.29 k30" f(CF) FENCE TYP. ° .� I I I UD- 5 � ?I AREA = 780 S.F' 18.1 DENOTES PAD ELEVATION TOP ELEV.= 1588 N. RIM ELEV.= 16.96 N.W. INV. EL = 12.07 (30' RCP) ( ) n W O \� I I 9 \ J Jj \ t: S INV. EL= 11.50 (24' RCP) THROAT EL.= 16.18 20 Q � /%' 8 I ?Or 2 I 9 as 6pr•9 / / D -11 1 D " N.E. INV. EL IS UNOBTAINABLE (6' RCP 1 li 20'/27 s ,' I II \ \ \•; N. INV. EL = 11,53 (24" RCP) E INV. EL= 12.69 (18" RCP) ) CURB INLET (ES -17) ti° �o o I M II\ \ \ / �'� ( ) s w S I B ��, / I I �Z' 5'R �`' , / / , UD- 1 DENOTES STORM CROSSING W. INV. EL= 12.36 (24' RCP) CURB INLET ES -13 N. RIM ELEV.= 18.47 X I c 13. 18'R An OUTFALL CONTROL „ c o >' O g. u a' II Ti' U x\1 sR i" CONNECT 18 RCP N. RIM ELEV.= 16.84 THROAT EL= 17.54 0�'.� \ % , 'tC! \' 1 t 0 / / / t`• STRUCTURE (ES -03) THROAT EL= 15.76 E. INV. EL. = 13.94 24' RCP '` ^° \°'' I s `cfi A 7 \ / / / Jo -t 2� ;; �;�:a SEE DETAIL ON SHT. N0. 8 _ TO INLET @ I.E. 13.09 _ 9 \1 I , ° ° /x \ \0 J, \ lia LaLr TOP ELEV.= 15.23 S. INV. E. = 12.34 (30" RCP) S. INV. EL. = 13.99 k24` RCP; c3 1 I I t O ) J \°' I D- 2 9.3 '> / /\"� Off' N.W. INV. EL= 9.43 (19 "x30" ERCP) CURB INLET (ES -08) N. INV. El. = 12.33 (30` RCP) N. INV. EL = 13.93 (24" RCP) o II I I I 1LLI� I I� x 8 X \ / / '� TOP OF WEIR EL = 14.38 v I % \� �' ,< E ✓ M / / / / fr. i = " r �. o r N. RIM ELEV.= 17.11 II $- 1h I t O ) \ F• D -13 r f BOTTOM OF WEIR EL = 13.67 THROAT EL= 16.22 CURB INLET (ES -14) CURB INLET (ES -18) / \ 21 Q a; w . / I I N rn \° 3 • , Al ;\ z z�j -ra / / `I ` ' N. RIM ELEV.= 17.21 N. RIM ELEV= 18.39 t1 �`°f ' • I I _ / w� 00 4 , c o '`� .F. _ L '4\ 9�i INSTALL STAKED TO BE REMOVED W. INV. EL= 16.2 (18" RCP) / _ TO BE REPLACED THROAT EL= 16.16 THROAT EL= 17.46 1 �� i 0 :a 4 3 R F ,� SILT SCREEN WITH S -21 CONNECT 18 RCP S. INV EL. _ 12.69 (30' RCP W. INV. EL = 14.36 (24' RCP) / � \� I K � \ 1 '/205►► � 'y ' `Z11 19 7 I , z8' /aaR /Jp' 15'/24'R I I x 8111 1 �9 ' 6 / / / /J�1 ` FENCE (TYP.) } 29'X45' ERCP TO INLET I.E. 14.27 N. . EL = 12.66 11130' RCP x o K �° ;: J9 t ° -� o \ (� 13' 0'R PLUG WEST INVERT moo, � I 60 �\ ��' a'� °� 39 \ 9 4 c ° 1 ^ P \0 ' / / / / / 4; WETLAND BUFFER DEFICIT \ ` 0 ' X °z a x / PGE SM Xi ''. \ 6.\ \o0 19,'� x 016'/37'R / / `• AREA =: 1 474 S.F. END OF PIPE (ES -04) MANHOLE (ES -15) s o I I \ ti INV. = 8.97 HEADWALL ES -09 N. RIM ELEV.= 18.10 2a'/32'R E 2 ( ) N. INV. EL = 12.91 (30" RCP) F.F.E. I Q GRATE INLET (ES -05) TOP ELEV.= 13.28 S. INV. EL. = 12.91 (30' RCP) \ 15'/ O I M 19.63 I I \ II �) 1- v %8 . /�pP o pRP \ \` °� •� 11 x\ / D -� }' �° ' M . S.E. INV. EL= 1.64 (36' RCP) I h TOP ELEV.= 14.98 22 Q I N \ 13•/ 5.5R Z a P �• WE' AREA A ° S.E. INV. EL.= 9.39 (19'x30' ERCP) y c3 I ,,}},, vim c 6 AREA 0.19 Ac. 1 \ OUTFALL CONTROL , I I I iti j�,�R' -- o o 0 �, \ h, \ -o x J 7 e S. INV. EL= 9.37 (24" RCA) ,4'/z1� �-� al m tJi ,6 0 \ \ \�i Xr / %Ir J6✓ `\ N.W. INV. EL= 9.37 (29'x45 ERCP) STRUCTURE (ES -10) / �, 'o - - I I �: I / EE CA I $ \ °� \�"' \� \ \ ' 6 F F E• 3 / 16.63 CONNECT PROPOSED TOP ELEV.= 14.32 c o 4 /31'R I x TIP. \ 11 \ �c \0 P 19' X 30" ERCP @ N.W. INV. EL= 7.76 (36" RCP) �C ^ hh� I �� c 38' 3 R 19.A ��, i D / / J '' 16� 16.60 WEIR EL = 13.33 10 O a° y ��' \ ' \ I 9, o ) J LE. 9.37 . °. g. \ 6y UD- 3 , X `J /ter \ s 25'/36R `1 r P� _ , \ \gah�OL \\ 5\ STORM STRUCTURE TABLE \ - _ - c o i �o III �I I \� 1,/17 'RIM f 3 A1� l .n \ •'_; ��' \ \\ \ °�' ��`' JD- $ WETLAND JURISDIC ONAL ' °or I I n \ cp �:� \ _ 4; LINE & EX. TOP OF 'BANK �f j. + \ ASEME T J V I 1i- m �? - o ��� B J�` \°�\ \ �� , \ °�h \00�' �% / SPRING BRANCH CREEK ��Tg,��' 16 a S -1 MITERED END SECTION (18) S -8 TYPE P - ALT. A M.H. S -17 TYPE C DITCH BOTTOM INLET 2 I x �\ 35 5'R Zs' /3o'R o „ n u „ n "Coo \ 1 45 I� ,� ti /�, w \\ �\• •. W I �ZL1�' , °° 37 1g, °� n \ �• \ �_�01 P °° 4 / / / 15' WETLAND _ �� �� ALLOWED 15' WETLAND I \ h h \� \1' r 1 ' -/ F.D.O.T. INDEX N0.272 F.D.O.T. INDEX N0.200 & 201 F.D.O.T. INDEX N0.232 - I Q F.F.E. = I X 1 ' J ,a5 II x ti� �o �o X ` \` X ' x '��; BUFFER n ti\l titi III W W BUFFFER ADJACENT TO INV. EL. = 14.20 TOP EL. = 17.70 x� 20.83 / I �� I �-� I o. �o �s ;: \\ ;�� \\ 1g.1 / \0X`0. RIM EL. =18.40 oy I �, t. X UD- -, �C \ ': 741, �' oHw2 �( r EXIST. STORMWATER INV. EL. = 15.37 SEE SHEET o♦ �1 J F' Og '� / �, ECEV T 2.87 69 > S -2 TYPE "C" DITCH BOTTOM INLET INV. EL. = 13.91 �- - 2�0 �0• �� x� I I w �o I , o �� \\ \\ F• E• - JD -1 �.cJ 69s DETENTION POND \° o ✓ I jtw-5 I NO. 7 FOR POND a\ `..'Z116\t \ s � v 19• �,` • �> / °Y , - I II I I J F.D.O.T. INDEX N0.232 S -9 TYPE "P" -ALT. "A" M.H. S -20 MITERED END SECTION (15 ") I I '9 o +' m CROSS SE \ \ 1z•/1 EX. L ES 'T. "2 .R. 5404, PG. 946) I O� 46 „ c^ � ,�' \ R X • , / , , , TOP EL. = 17.50 F.D.O.T. INDEX N0.272 -P3 t! �`' ^ \\ JD -20 Q F.D.O.T. INDEX N0.200 & 201 � � I I / I TREE CA NO F 6 8 w 1� � � � � 1 '' \ / � '' � I INV. EL. = 14.30 INV. EL. = 15.60 0 I 1s zzR PROP. 2 i o i F C \\ tr RIM EL. = 18.70 24 Q o IiJ I J{ I T �� 19' \�' 0' . \� :1175 INV. EL. = 14.30 N �N TR NS. >p�Q° �g5 8 DRAINAG \ 86• \ \1612' FL tr7� 7 \ �� 1g,6 a, 1z, S -3 CURB INLET TYPE A -1 S -21 OUTFALL CONTROL STIR. ? I r I / ESM T. / cf` J9 : =: f �. as / x o "•d / J \o� \� I �c O T = S -10 FLARED END SECTION 18" O INV. EL. = 9.43 x2� 6 I r S 9ss X '� \ \ \ 'x t 5. o`xre �'' 11 1 \a!`' o o1- OP EL. 17.75 O ( ) ° J / J / J o`% S -1 r s c °i \ 21 /33R , ^� or i F.D.O.T. INDEX NO. SEE DETAIL ON SHT. NO. �Jee �� R ,''- ;99 I 9y `� 8 1 \ %' x\ \°'' 6 INV. EL. = 14.60 ° I .66 ♦ Rt' I I 6 �; -� \0\ \ > x \ \ '!27' I { 90 INV. EL. = 14.80 REPLACES EXISTING o` I I c o >' c� o >t : \a� ti II • • Z'(,�k 1s'R / I c o 1 �T3 \ 49 I , Q E - STRUCTURE ES -05 _ 00 '� I �I'7/ 5L2 ' S -2 1g'J .SR 1- % \ B �'�/ 6` o S 4 CURB INLET TYPE A -1 25 TR C. _ \ \3 �� N TOP EL. = 17.75 S -11 MITERED END SECTION (15 ") / ¢ N 1�N 6 I o X I !96 \ 0 J`� 4 J 0 . sae 9• r Mfr•, f tr •; , °Q- { v 00 1 �- -+�*- `4 ` ♦ \'�' ° INV. EL. = 14.70 F.D.O.T. INDEX NO. 272 i 9 /1s'R ° �% !'� - INV. EL. = 13.60 ° I 1 , . \> ! r •r a -f �r�! \r , • • = Js a,• UT1L M T. N P 5r �l e1 2 I 1 S -5 FLARED END SECTION (18 ") \ I \a` , ,�°►' .fi >9i . <....��',3 ' ?s3 s -, ,,r:,,°�J>; -� ;.t' tx' e, e� �G \��_ s� S -3 10 F.F 3 oax I \ \ 1 ES -10 f, O X , '� % .v� .w,9.;', .,v,y, ad' L,r.,, �yt, -,.° .r.'",,,. -_ ,_ __ ^?G� a11� - _•y• -.'1 �' `O 0 P/ �c ° F.D.O.T. INDEX NO.270 X06 �° �° \• '_'`_ = -' _ _`'= - ,_ - f= _ _ .e - - _ _ _ - _ _ = c - 0 <c \ \ \ \ 6 / J S -12 TYPE "C" DITCH BOTTOM INLET ! \ ti� qI > `r'i `.' -` �` _ l\ �\ \1 t \ , tia , \11 1h �'� ��� Z INV. EL. = 14.00 F.D.O.T. INDEX N0.232 9 •> x II M > c1 n "PVC WM - t .2 s - ; ' 18• \ I <' s ��� i% < \ 'n h I'\ I J6 O WM WM WM� WM WM / 'ry .- \V X xrsT. S&MwA 7`E I / 1 ° TOP EL. = 18.00 26 Q o w.- �� �� >, •s s• /t8 6s ah ' \ ' 1 I� • • ' , 1s• zo. a r `� S -6 OUTFALL CONTROL STIR. N 1�N I I ��> 0 ti x J9 0 $ _MOD B 1- ; D ENT /ON P 11�b/ I I °o INV. EL. = 13.40 SLOT EL. = 17.50 u- \ =r J9 A B S / 6 ES -19 \ 9 X B t 1 1 \ 11 it'R ° x Q INV. EL. =13.85 �� s 19.8 19.4 s 19.4's,1 x 19. 7 0' ! B 14•/fQ'R . ` \1� x�- I �OND 2' ?° �/ SEE DETAIL ON SHT. NO. 7 I B9� B �Op 9 1 /2 'R ' 9 � � 1 �9 s I o o I J`� °'0���y/ x - ' �& 9 ?9d o� \6 -A FLARED END SECTION (24 ") = I >, 9 y' _ 2 _ - TO REMAIN x'. 19.8 F.F.E. - F.F.E. = F.F.E. F.F.E. F.F. - \ a F`I 1 1h 1 I - 10 ki 3 S -7 TYPE "P" - ALT. "A" M.H. I c 9.73 F.F.E. _ \1 ^�' II \ \�' a J? 0 \ ' (/� O F.D.O.T. INDEX N0.270 !�e II ss I \01h J9s = 20 .73 19. .63 19.23 I 4� I ►� B \� ,s °�E- - uj F.D.O.T. INDEX NO. 200 & 201 INV. EL. = 12.09 ?09 Q o �� c• \�. ��^, I r• �6 6 F.F.E. I n , \^� J,> r J _ �' \ a5n 20.13 f I I LLW' 0D 18.4 _ 150 6 \1 N 'O9 I c'6 668 ` W RIM EL. = 17.50 S -14 MITERED END SECTION (15 ") px 27 `L: I ) v ri 6 W `�J a I o, a o ? 6 k 1�x I Ir6 �r h 17 "'I e o. INV. EL. = 13.23 F.D.O.T. INDEX NO. 272 0° °* ti °-` �9ti °1 ��s o I I o \��`' ati ? ° �8 \ 1� 34 \�',� xr� \�o� i \ �s I \��- IWI \h INV. EL. 15.15 ti I 1 �O �x�30 X 20 SI T . 8 3� - _L - , ;, \�,• 69 Z I ti� 1(ISIQILITY TRIANGL ♦9" 154 13'/ 'R ,6 ♦ -� I 9R %� \�' ,'' 12 20.5' 13'/17'R , ' t i •�J _. 0 D AI GE k UTILI ESM'T. 531, PG. 3 0 ,3< ;- 2"/ 'R ♦ t2' /td !h ' -t,>t ,A/ ° \' A. STORM SEWER LINE TABLE _ - c�-�, ,�, _ , - 5 - - M - F - fJV FM ►�° - - FM - '..::.:;I �� - \1 - '�s G Xlf E �1 :;.... . - uc uc :.�i ;:•:• FROM TO PIPE PIPE PIPE PIPE .�--�� = STRUCTURE STRUCTURE MATERIAL SIZE LENGTH SLOPE -�, - '�>___ -- - - -k -- ----�c -- - -- -___- _____- _�'--__��C- - -- F�-X'- - -___- __-- - - - - =- - �� ES -17 l '6J' > Jci 1 °6' r r� EX. 2' VALLEY GUTTER Tc.J d fc, lc. \1 r Jc,.� ES -14 rcd �o� '� 1, ES -12 l J Ff ' ES -13 c. „ „ !,• ' d `�' 'c a�• �� 9 �,� >9\ ES -16 S7� .,� !.� >6 EX. 26' ASPH. PAV'T. !.r >s dj.� > >s 1. r >r �� >J 6 \ 2• ' s ! -/A" S -21 ES -03 ERCP 19 X 30 24 0.25% % si ,� 6a \0 1ti' 6 > ' o �� . �, . °« - > 6 >' sa s �3�96 >6 s S -20 S -17 RCP 15" 113 0.20% \ °^\ J - - �a-�X- �hy� -�-- -� - X J 9� - �E�68s, re' - -�`i j'"jr xr, >6 �, _° `�'' - �- 3E-1 -� - d6 J6� \�o I O \0 \ i6 J6 96 O 90 10,90 s o � �� 0 20' X 20' SIGHT o 6 6 \ o S -17 S -14 RCP 18 110 0.20% POND No. 3 N. BETTY LANE VISIBILITY TRI'ANGLE o T.O.B. EL. = 17.50 ON SITE TBM ES -06 S -13 RCP 24" 21 0.20% UNDERDRAIN STRUCTURE TABLE ES -18 S -12 S -11 RCP 15" 119 0.21% D.L.W. EL. _ 16.40 SET N &T � 60' R/W (TYp,) „ o UD- 1 UNDERDRAIN CONC. COLLAR UD- 4 UNDERDRAIN CLEANOUT D.H.W EL. (25)= 17.00 ELEV. = 20.12 N.A.V.D. 88 BENCHMARK o S -10 S -9 RCP 24 10 5.00% W /6' X 4' RIPRAP SPLASH PAD TOP EL. = 17.25 BOTT EL. = 15.50 R Q S -9 S -8 RCP 24" 74 0.53% ELEVATIONS B ED ON N.A.V.D. OF 1988; � INV EL = 13 34 INV EL - 14 75 S -8 ES -01 RCP 24" 28 1.50% UNDERDRAIN LINE TABLE CITY OF CLEAR�VATER "1 -08" ELEVATION 15.6715' ES -07 S -7 RCP 18" 68 0.20% y UD- 2 10" NYLOPLAST DRAIN BASIN UD- 5 UNDERDRAIN CLEANOUT V S -7 S -6 RCP 18" 87 0.20% W /H -20 SOLID LID TOP EL. = 17.25 FROM TO SIZE LENGTH NOTE: • 3 �� o RIM EL. =18.85 INV. EL. =14.75 STIR. # STIR. # TYPE (IN.) (FT.) SLOPE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT TO ENGINEER OF RECORD p ES -08 S -5 RCP 18 131 0.29% INV. EL. = 13.70 UD -5 UD -3 PVC (PERF) 6" 75 0.00% A DEWATERING PLAN PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK. � S-4 S -3 RCP 15" 34 0.29% UD -4 UD -3 PVC PERF 6" 75 0.00% UD- 3 10" NYLOPLAST DRAIN BASIN ( ) FAILURE TO MAINTAIN EROSION PROTECTION AND o S -3 S -2 RCP 18" 120 0.25% UD -3 UD -2 PVC (SOLID) 6" 154 0.40% DISCHARGE TURBIDITY LEVELS IN ACCORDANCE WITH V S -2 S -1 RCP 18" 30 0.33% RIM EL SOLID LID UD -2 UD -1 PVC (SOLID) 6" 90 0.40% PERMIT CONDITIONS WILL RESULT IN ENFORCEMENT ACTION BY THE SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER 1 INV. EL. = 14.75 (E & VV) INV. EL. = 14.32 (N) MANAGEMENT DISTRICT. z W o Z O W 0 W W o B m W • W '_ 40 Z � o Z 3 a � W o Q J LL > o 'a rn o W Z uA m co V6 M W 0 Q y Lr-o Z 0 N /0 w LL. v p F- w3 mod• Q N 7 f0 V y s Z M n N • Z Wo • oj°,CL M Ln Ar • di O 16 o 'o o • `•{f 00 a. H1 vi U IL vi L,_i a: 0 Y Y } Zm m m 3 0 Y a U V W W. A. ad cZ WZ Z O p� gun W z > cc W o0 t9 Z W Z t•- to W W N O 0 z M M 0 :0 CIA L''k V-1 cam.: �• ;; 4: t U I�3a WETLAND TABLE WATER SUPPLY WELL NOTE: W PURSUANT TO SWFWMD B.O.R. - - CHAPTER 5, SECTION 5.3 r POINT NORTHING EASTING THERE CAN BE NO WATER SUP Y Y WELLS LOCATED J OND N No. I J Jo 2 1329694.55 402623.37 WITHIN 100.0 FEET OF A STOR W WATER FACILITY. E EL. = 1 16.00 J JD 3 1329695.90 402653.29 ` rD.H.W O 14.50 J JD 3A 1329694.22 402669.69 D L.(25)= 1 15.00 J JD 4 1329696.43 402685.15 JD 5 13296 88.77 402706.80 ' E EL. = 1 13.00 EXIST. POWER POLE -,--\ - N0. 7 FOR POND NO. 7 FOR POND'," BE PLACED AT EX� TOP OF 402744.43 TO BE RELOCATED BE SELECTED BY OWNER CONST. SANDBAG P NET AND DRIVE CROSS SECTION w JD 8 1329669.90 402762.92 CROSS SECTION • >, BANK TO PROTECT EE 39 BEGIN 6 HIGH CEMENT RIPRAP THE CANOPY , � "P1 B -P1 B" �° # JD 9 1329669.52 402786.20 - - - - ' VINYL A CE L� ASH ^PAD \y / �� /W - Ek. 6" PVC WM -a1- _ \> „PIA -P1 A" ,J�s \A JD 10 1329678.04 402833.79 40 20 0 40 BY OTHERS (P) END 6 HIGH JD 11 1329684.27 402857.93 EX. 6 PVC WM SP - �i' 'm mri - ---es� W�- W6d -[�- WM "�' / i Jo X �- W"'- ""`t -."�' "�"' ,\ - ` dp" \1 \1 �' \�' J.S X ti� 0ti X hh x `'�� '�> VINYL FENCE JD 12 1329684.93 402881.17 1•, h > X sX \� - .� ,� .. X X, .. .,. a• \a'- \'� `J t'a X h ^� J J s• • \ ',sx �,sX 61 EOP �'� °X (EX. ASPH. PAVT.)'��x' �� A '� ��' ? �'� Ai "'�1 '�'. .- -J�-iE "--�C °-'�- --� - - ° o JD 13 1329699.79 402898.99 SCALE IN FEET -- `• h rs s� Js \a' h° DITCH \"� 1 •ES-04 �r > \ r ° ° - a x- s - `` ' /2o.1r x \ - 1 = 40 �4- -� X- �- X� ,> _ = �1 - 0 , - X�� - X \ ' k M JD 14 1329714.86 402911.16 �, \� \ \x�x s J> 1 -T hi, x sy ✓ ti `1 X \`° X - « X s DITCH 'J ss z4' /ze'R pR(�pJ�O a` • /2s'R 's 6 JD 15 1329727.70 402917,26 i \�� S -20 90 EX. DITCH h10 \1' '\� S/ �� 5 -14 \hOh \6h J6� ? : �j _`24'/40'R 0 0 24•/31'R -• . _� l ? \ , r6 7•/12'R 8' /8'R h, r �- -�f��- ._ \ DRAIf� & 21./3o,R 10 1 !9 O o JD 16 1329717.94 402934.31 / X �I s _ �� B ^ 1 °, -- EXIST. HEADW L \ °���`�' a J,> '��, rill, °�� TILIT- YF9 M'T. a ��Xx{ \�'�a '■ o>> /RO / TREE LEGEND qg, /1o'R JD 17 1329716.96 402960.20 oa �a J6 y O� �6 $ 1 Jy J� 60 \�' \ u�0 BE REMOVED UG '� ° uc-/ uc \ ES- 1a �`' y •R 8 /zo'R JD 18 1329744.05 402990.46 00 /0 R TREE DIAMETER CANOPY RADIUS \� V t5' /2a'R \1 ����' 1 ' ° 99 Pl �' JD- - %r JD 19 1329786.80 403027.20 OAK / SWEETGUM -�E-`' h J a/t2 ti / // 17 8 O tie X 6 •�. , ' ': • 6 � � � .. ° ,, Va ? ' J .� : • :' ,. \1 RAINAGE E SEMENT 66 I SE N , - '� O \`��, Jb' 2 'y \ 0'R o _ \° S -11 ? �j W t; JD 21 1329845,58 403067.42 • CHERRY LAUREL e HOLLY Ix L, c /40R 11 /12'x' t. s.. \ - \ 16 J _ - - - 4• /5'R 1i Q \�. / / / / WETLAND BUFFER • PALM MAPLE >ss Ak S -12 EXIST. HEADWALL 9> iv ' >, I' 4o'R Q COMPENSATION AREA O PINE 18•/24'R 0 0 •/, '� TO BE REMOVED /14'R = / a / AREA = 786 S.F,. SYCAMORE >> Js 1 _ T.O.B. L. 16.0 �,+ 'R \ 6 F.F.E. - _ ? ? \ E -' °:- 4• 24'/35'R ■ hx _ ,s'�ea- -sue �-� / Jo -3 CAMPHOR • WILLOW 2 =�F6�j F.F.E. 5 \� � • ' o-'- WETLAND JURISDICTIONAL 10 MIMOSA 0 HERMOSA x 6 X 20.13 F.F.E. _:.:,::;: •.:;: x,9 1 X 14 13 xJ 2 ~ 1 1 ^ $ -21 ��x1D =3A� LINE & EX. TOP OF BANK J9 O v, 0°' ; A / 3 CONST. 12.0 L.F \ /r,� / / / SPRING BRANCH CREEK MAGNOLIA UNKNOWN 17.9 1 9 i 1 g 6 t� /20.5 J :..:.. B e °> 1 A A A > \a"'1 6" PVC (NON -PERF) .S 20 _ X17 F F EZ•y W 8� 8�3 18.5 18.6 ,� o.` ®o oo� /, /Jd -4 LEGEND 79 19.9 / 9.8 19. 1 w tl II M II M w"� X \ , 8 / 6 P\VC (PERF) ' ��' / {� e4 / BOUNDARY LINE /> >ss s P�• o Q I w' Wq / w� �7 / FF Y, /U.D. a' 9 • .... WETLAND JURISDICTIONAL LINE Is' 21R 6 EXIST, CONC. j / / / c" W 51 0 9' / 49 p J9 z �� g �9F 9✓ \ RETAINING WALL x,6 '9-= ``'• - a x ``� `` x x `` X ; �s ° 1 x x ��� A 4/ / JD -5 TO REMAIN PROPOSED STORM SEWER -'9 %g6 \ ° E . TQ` T. (0 G. . t ` 1olto , >s _ . 'T 23 e e9° I '9 ya °�� ,> K to / Ex CSir DITCH 3-10 o I8 1 ,n7+� 9 `• / / �� F / / / <; PROPOSED STAKED SILT FENCE Cs) PROP - C� Mt ANAL �' z'R t o >, ' - - - P - - - - - 71- 9 , JD -6 1, (DOUBLE ROW ADJACENT TO WETLANDS) � � TO E FILLED ° � _ � '�; . ` ... ` J� o s r s °'' \ 0� , 6h' EX. 7 EEIC GU�ER URB c'- 1� s x /gip! CENTERLINE OF (36'R L.F.) \ e> 4 ' I Q'�� /.: �?r J, �. •, \ TRANS. SPRINGTIME BRANCH DENOTES WETLAND BUFFER AREA 1 24•/43'R > 5• R \0 \ / !6/ S 06 X EX. T. J r z$ 6 �d 10 9 i PROP. RAINAW� �'� • r6 y6 9 >> J> J >,` \^� ° �i 25 WETLAND I \°+' Q 24 " /35'R I ° 1 I •� lj r , .I "Tp 9+� �� \� \�' 9 x, x x I x' ,,& UTILITY ^,a 1114'6-OD �' ES -08 oQ, rc - - - �� / / F D -s BUFFER LINE DENOTES LIMITS OF PAVEMENT Pis \ 010-/21.5'R ?os f y4SEMENT rte/ ,2 J FL: 16.8 - - - `� - - - - X- - - - S ' �cP J&A� &CURB REMOVAL / X 1 7 4 s / 17.50 9 / / .. :i•, ;. .,,., ` °� 'ap / \ r X I 1 g +��y' 17 22: 0" \1 \ ' a t^ >> v �j.O��ON 'ss tss9 \1� 3 \1' 1 '' a 'r'' /� �' S -12 STORM STRUCTURE NUMBER >z�fos'R1 9 / /r • //� / t; / I I ♦'ts/74R C0NS1:, .0 \L� \ \ \° a'� �� J /� , , P -� J� 6 PVC (N-CIN -PERF \ J6 h x r- -f` I/ �,�zi �A 9'/23' l / e >� '�,� e ,4 $ \ �, \ ,�� 9`' /w / PROPOSED INLET LOCATION ' 'e> T"18 \ \��� / / 11 27'9 PROPOSED GRADE EXISTING STORM STRUCTURE TABLE `� �o cc \1 °��dV • z4$% - �_ x> x 1s I r c� \1 Al (� F .�' 3 \ B C,,�^ I 18" t 'IR ` 1 \0� 18 �8p� x J 9 TOT LQT 1\ 1 ° 1 ? / /\ t•. �- DRAINAGE FLOW ARROW HEADWALL (ES -01) HEADWALL (ES -06) HEADWALL (ES -11) 9g �4� 1t)r%19R ':' J �g,2 I �' 11- S �x F • �1 �ti p` '> / / / / \- N $. 0 SWALE FLOW ARROW TOP ELEV.= 18.71 TOP ELEV.= 17.99 TOP ELEV.= 16.97 t O > h a�` ; X / 41 19 • \ ��o N. INV. EL= 13.49 (24' RCP) E. INV. EL= 12.13 (24' RCP) S.E. INV, EL= 11.94 (30' RCP) CURB INLET (ES -16) a �� I \ . I � I I � � x �� 5 1�ACT I rx �\ / , / / J o F.F.E. FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION N. RIM ELEV,= 18.24 TO BE REMOVED TO BE REMOVED STORM SEWER MANHOLE ES -12 INSTALL STAKED \�1 I '. I 6 �,� ��9 "A" F F E �1 \\ , , \ WETLAND BUFFER ( ) THROAT EL= 17.33 5 O 1• o N. RIM ELEV.= 17.58 S. INV, EL = 13.34 24' RCP SILT SCREEN `° I I 1$ 9 �x r �' .�� ` \ / �y 0/ t•:, COMPENSATION AREA A DENOTES LOT GRADING TYPE GRATE INLET (ES -02) CURB INLET (ES -07) ) II M x I 0 0° s9 \ \\ S. INV. EL. = 12.09 (30' RCP) N. INV. EL = 13.29 k30" f(CF) FENCE TYP. ° .� I I I UD- 5 � ?I AREA = 780 S.F' 18.1 DENOTES PAD ELEVATION TOP ELEV.= 1588 N. RIM ELEV.= 16.96 N.W. INV. EL = 12.07 (30' RCP) ( ) n W O \� I I 9 \ J Jj \ t: S INV. EL= 11.50 (24' RCP) THROAT EL.= 16.18 20 Q � /%' 8 I ?Or 2 I 9 as 6pr•9 / / D -11 1 D " N.E. INV. EL IS UNOBTAINABLE (6' RCP 1 li 20'/27 s ,' I II \ \ \•; N. INV. EL = 11,53 (24" RCP) E INV. EL= 12.69 (18" RCP) ) CURB INLET (ES -17) ti° �o o I M II\ \ \ / �'� ( ) s w S I B ��, / I I �Z' 5'R �`' , / / , UD- 1 DENOTES STORM CROSSING W. INV. EL= 12.36 (24' RCP) CURB INLET ES -13 N. RIM ELEV.= 18.47 X I c 13. 18'R An OUTFALL CONTROL „ c o >' O g. u a' II Ti' U x\1 sR i" CONNECT 18 RCP N. RIM ELEV.= 16.84 THROAT EL= 17.54 0�'.� \ % , 'tC! \' 1 t 0 / / / t`• STRUCTURE (ES -03) THROAT EL= 15.76 E. INV. EL. = 13.94 24' RCP '` ^° \°'' I s `cfi A 7 \ / / / Jo -t 2� ;; �;�:a SEE DETAIL ON SHT. N0. 8 _ TO INLET @ I.E. 13.09 _ 9 \1 I , ° ° /x \ \0 J, \ lia LaLr TOP ELEV.= 15.23 S. INV. E. = 12.34 (30" RCP) S. INV. EL. = 13.99 k24` RCP; c3 1 I I t O ) J \°' I D- 2 9.3 '> / /\"� Off' N.W. INV. EL= 9.43 (19 "x30" ERCP) CURB INLET (ES -08) N. INV. El. = 12.33 (30` RCP) N. INV. EL = 13.93 (24" RCP) o II I I I 1LLI� I I� x 8 X \ / / '� TOP OF WEIR EL = 14.38 v I % \� �' ,< E ✓ M / / / / fr. i = " r �. o r N. RIM ELEV.= 17.11 II $- 1h I t O ) \ F• D -13 r f BOTTOM OF WEIR EL = 13.67 THROAT EL= 16.22 CURB INLET (ES -14) CURB INLET (ES -18) / \ 21 Q a; w . / I I N rn \° 3 • , Al ;\ z z�j -ra / / `I ` ' N. RIM ELEV.= 17.21 N. RIM ELEV= 18.39 t1 �`°f ' • I I _ / w� 00 4 , c o '`� .F. _ L '4\ 9�i INSTALL STAKED TO BE REMOVED W. INV. EL= 16.2 (18" RCP) / _ TO BE REPLACED THROAT EL= 16.16 THROAT EL= 17.46 1 �� i 0 :a 4 3 R F ,� SILT SCREEN WITH S -21 CONNECT 18 RCP S. INV EL. _ 12.69 (30' RCP W. INV. EL = 14.36 (24' RCP) / � \� I K � \ 1 '/205►► � 'y ' `Z11 19 7 I , z8' /aaR /Jp' 15'/24'R I I x 8111 1 �9 ' 6 / / / /J�1 ` FENCE (TYP.) } 29'X45' ERCP TO INLET I.E. 14.27 N. . EL = 12.66 11130' RCP x o K �° ;: J9 t ° -� o \ (� 13' 0'R PLUG WEST INVERT moo, � I 60 �\ ��' a'� °� 39 \ 9 4 c ° 1 ^ P \0 ' / / / / / 4; WETLAND BUFFER DEFICIT \ ` 0 ' X °z a x / PGE SM Xi ''. \ 6.\ \o0 19,'� x 016'/37'R / / `• AREA =: 1 474 S.F. END OF PIPE (ES -04) MANHOLE (ES -15) s o I I \ ti INV. = 8.97 HEADWALL ES -09 N. RIM ELEV.= 18.10 2a'/32'R E 2 ( ) N. INV. EL = 12.91 (30" RCP) F.F.E. I Q GRATE INLET (ES -05) TOP ELEV.= 13.28 S. INV. EL. = 12.91 (30' RCP) \ 15'/ O I M 19.63 I I \ II �) 1- v %8 . /�pP o pRP \ \` °� •� 11 x\ / D -� }' �° ' M . S.E. INV. EL= 1.64 (36' RCP) I h TOP ELEV.= 14.98 22 Q I N \ 13•/ 5.5R Z a P �• WE' AREA A ° S.E. INV. EL.= 9.39 (19'x30' ERCP) y c3 I ,,}},, vim c 6 AREA 0.19 Ac. 1 \ OUTFALL CONTROL , I I I iti j�,�R' -- o o 0 �, \ h, \ -o x J 7 e S. INV. EL= 9.37 (24" RCA) ,4'/z1� �-� al m tJi ,6 0 \ \ \�i Xr / %Ir J6✓ `\ N.W. INV. EL= 9.37 (29'x45 ERCP) STRUCTURE (ES -10) / �, 'o - - I I �: I / EE CA I $ \ °� \�"' \� \ \ ' 6 F F E• 3 / 16.63 CONNECT PROPOSED TOP ELEV.= 14.32 c o 4 /31'R I x TIP. \ 11 \ �c \0 P 19' X 30" ERCP @ N.W. INV. EL= 7.76 (36" RCP) �C ^ hh� I �� c 38' 3 R 19.A ��, i D / / J '' 16� 16.60 WEIR EL = 13.33 10 O a° y ��' \ ' \ I 9, o ) J LE. 9.37 . °. g. \ 6y UD- 3 , X `J /ter \ s 25'/36R `1 r P� _ , \ \gah�OL \\ 5\ STORM STRUCTURE TABLE \ - _ - c o i �o III �I I \� 1,/17 'RIM f 3 A1� l .n \ •'_; ��' \ \\ \ °�' ��`' JD- $ WETLAND JURISDIC ONAL ' °or I I n \ cp �:� \ _ 4; LINE & EX. TOP OF 'BANK �f j. + \ ASEME T J V I 1i- m �? - o ��� B J�` \°�\ \ �� , \ °�h \00�' �% / SPRING BRANCH CREEK ��Tg,��' 16 a S -1 MITERED END SECTION (18) S -8 TYPE P - ALT. A M.H. S -17 TYPE C DITCH BOTTOM INLET 2 I x �\ 35 5'R Zs' /3o'R o „ n u „ n "Coo \ 1 45 I� ,� ti /�, w \\ �\• •. W I �ZL1�' , °° 37 1g, °� n \ �• \ �_�01 P °° 4 / / / 15' WETLAND _ �� �� ALLOWED 15' WETLAND I \ h h \� \1' r 1 ' -/ F.D.O.T. INDEX N0.272 F.D.O.T. INDEX N0.200 & 201 F.D.O.T. INDEX N0.232 - I Q F.F.E. = I X 1 ' J ,a5 II x ti� �o �o X ` \` X ' x '��; BUFFER n ti\l titi III W W BUFFFER ADJACENT TO INV. EL. = 14.20 TOP EL. = 17.70 x� 20.83 / I �� I �-� I o. �o �s ;: \\ ;�� \\ 1g.1 / \0X`0. RIM EL. =18.40 oy I �, t. X UD- -, �C \ ': 741, �' oHw2 �( r EXIST. STORMWATER INV. EL. = 15.37 SEE SHEET o♦ �1 J F' Og '� / �, ECEV T 2.87 69 > S -2 TYPE "C" DITCH BOTTOM INLET INV. EL. = 13.91 �- - 2�0 �0• �� x� I I w �o I , o �� \\ \\ F• E• - JD -1 �.cJ 69s DETENTION POND \° o ✓ I jtw-5 I NO. 7 FOR POND a\ `..'Z116\t \ s � v 19• �,` • �> / °Y , - I II I I J F.D.O.T. INDEX N0.232 S -9 TYPE "P" -ALT. "A" M.H. S -20 MITERED END SECTION (15 ") I I '9 o +' m CROSS SE \ \ 1z•/1 EX. L ES 'T. "2 .R. 5404, PG. 946) I O� 46 „ c^ � ,�' \ R X • , / , , , TOP EL. = 17.50 F.D.O.T. INDEX N0.272 -P3 t! �`' ^ \\ JD -20 Q F.D.O.T. INDEX N0.200 & 201 � � I I / I TREE CA NO F 6 8 w 1� � � � � 1 '' \ / � '' � I INV. EL. = 14.30 INV. EL. = 15.60 0 I 1s zzR PROP. 2 i o i F C \\ tr RIM EL. = 18.70 24 Q o IiJ I J{ I T �� 19' \�' 0' . \� :1175 INV. EL. = 14.30 N �N TR NS. >p�Q° �g5 8 DRAINAG \ 86• \ \1612' FL tr7� 7 \ �� 1g,6 a, 1z, S -3 CURB INLET TYPE A -1 S -21 OUTFALL CONTROL STIR. ? I r I / ESM T. / cf` J9 : =: f �. as / x o "•d / J \o� \� I �c O T = S -10 FLARED END SECTION 18" O INV. EL. = 9.43 x2� 6 I r S 9ss X '� \ \ \ 'x t 5. o`xre �'' 11 1 \a!`' o o1- OP EL. 17.75 O ( ) ° J / J / J o`% S -1 r s c °i \ 21 /33R , ^� or i F.D.O.T. INDEX NO. SEE DETAIL ON SHT. NO. �Jee �� R ,''- ;99 I 9y `� 8 1 \ %' x\ \°'' 6 INV. EL. = 14.60 ° I .66 ♦ Rt' I I 6 �; -� \0\ \ > x \ \ '!27' I { 90 INV. EL. = 14.80 REPLACES EXISTING o` I I c o >' c� o >t : \a� ti II • • Z'(,�k 1s'R / I c o 1 �T3 \ 49 I , Q E - STRUCTURE ES -05 _ 00 '� I �I'7/ 5L2 ' S -2 1g'J .SR 1- % \ B �'�/ 6` o S 4 CURB INLET TYPE A -1 25 TR C. _ \ \3 �� N TOP EL. = 17.75 S -11 MITERED END SECTION (15 ") / ¢ N 1�N 6 I o X I !96 \ 0 J`� 4 J 0 . sae 9• r Mfr•, f tr •; , °Q- { v 00 1 �- -+�*- `4 ` ♦ \'�' ° INV. EL. = 14.70 F.D.O.T. INDEX NO. 272 i 9 /1s'R ° �% !'� - INV. EL. = 13.60 ° I 1 , . \> ! r •r a -f �r�! \r , • • = Js a,• UT1L M T. N P 5r �l e1 2 I 1 S -5 FLARED END SECTION (18 ") \ I \a` , ,�°►' .fi >9i . <....��',3 ' ?s3 s -, ,,r:,,°�J>; -� ;.t' tx' e, e� �G \��_ s� S -3 10 F.F 3 oax I \ \ 1 ES -10 f, O X , '� % .v� .w,9.;', .,v,y, ad' L,r.,, �yt, -,.° .r.'",,,. -_ ,_ __ ^?G� a11� - _•y• -.'1 �' `O 0 P/ �c ° F.D.O.T. INDEX NO.270 X06 �° �° \• '_'`_ = -' _ _`'= - ,_ - f= _ _ .e - - _ _ _ - _ _ = c - 0 <c \ \ \ \ 6 / J S -12 TYPE "C" DITCH BOTTOM INLET ! \ ti� qI > `r'i `.' -` �` _ l\ �\ \1 t \ , tia , \11 1h �'� ��� Z INV. EL. = 14.00 F.D.O.T. INDEX N0.232 9 •> x II M > c1 n "PVC WM - t .2 s - ; ' 18• \ I <' s ��� i% < \ 'n h I'\ I J6 O WM WM WM� WM WM / 'ry .- \V X xrsT. S&MwA 7`E I / 1 ° TOP EL. = 18.00 26 Q o w.- �� �� >, •s s• /t8 6s ah ' \ ' 1 I� • • ' , 1s• zo. a r `� S -6 OUTFALL CONTROL STIR. N 1�N I I ��> 0 ti x J9 0 $ _MOD B 1- ; D ENT /ON P 11�b/ I I °o INV. EL. = 13.40 SLOT EL. = 17.50 u- \ =r J9 A B S / 6 ES -19 \ 9 X B t 1 1 \ 11 it'R ° x Q INV. EL. =13.85 �� s 19.8 19.4 s 19.4's,1 x 19. 7 0' ! B 14•/fQ'R . ` \1� x�- I �OND 2' ?° �/ SEE DETAIL ON SHT. NO. 7 I B9� B �Op 9 1 /2 'R ' 9 � � 1 �9 s I o o I J`� °'0���y/ x - ' �& 9 ?9d o� \6 -A FLARED END SECTION (24 ") = I >, 9 y' _ 2 _ - TO REMAIN x'. 19.8 F.F.E. - F.F.E. = F.F.E. F.F.E. F.F. - \ a F`I 1 1h 1 I - 10 ki 3 S -7 TYPE "P" - ALT. "A" M.H. I c 9.73 F.F.E. _ \1 ^�' II \ \�' a J? 0 \ ' (/� O F.D.O.T. INDEX N0.270 !�e II ss I \01h J9s = 20 .73 19. .63 19.23 I 4� I ►� B \� ,s °�E- - uj F.D.O.T. INDEX NO. 200 & 201 INV. EL. = 12.09 ?09 Q o �� c• \�. ��^, I r• �6 6 F.F.E. I n , \^� J,> r J _ �' \ a5n 20.13 f I I LLW' 0D 18.4 _ 150 6 \1 N 'O9 I c'6 668 ` W RIM EL. = 17.50 S -14 MITERED END SECTION (15 ") px 27 `L: I ) v ri 6 W `�J a I o, a o ? 6 k 1�x I Ir6 �r h 17 "'I e o. INV. EL. = 13.23 F.D.O.T. INDEX NO. 272 0° °* ti °-` �9ti °1 ��s o I I o \��`' ati ? ° �8 \ 1� 34 \�',� xr� \�o� i \ �s I \��- IWI \h INV. EL. 15.15 ti I 1 �O �x�30 X 20 SI T . 8 3� - _L - , ;, \�,• 69 Z I ti� 1(ISIQILITY TRIANGL ♦9" 154 13'/ 'R ,6 ♦ -� I 9R %� \�' ,'' 12 20.5' 13'/17'R , ' t i •�J _. 0 D AI GE k UTILI ESM'T. 531, PG. 3 0 ,3< ;- 2"/ 'R ♦ t2' /td !h ' -t,>t ,A/ ° \' A. STORM SEWER LINE TABLE _ - c�-�, ,�, _ , - 5 - - M - F - fJV FM ►�° - - FM - '..::.:;I �� - \1 - '�s G Xlf E �1 :;.... . - uc uc :.�i ;:•:• FROM TO PIPE PIPE PIPE PIPE .�--�� = STRUCTURE STRUCTURE MATERIAL SIZE LENGTH SLOPE -�, - '�>___ -- - - -k -- ----�c -- - -- -___- _____- _�'--__��C- - -- F�-X'- - -___- __-- - - - - =- - �� ES -17 l '6J' > Jci 1 °6' r r� EX. 2' VALLEY GUTTER Tc.J d fc, lc. \1 r Jc,.� ES -14 rcd �o� '� 1, ES -12 l J Ff ' ES -13 c. „ „ !,• ' d `�' 'c a�• �� 9 �,� >9\ ES -16 S7� .,� !.� >6 EX. 26' ASPH. PAV'T. !.r >s dj.� > >s 1. r >r �� >J 6 \ 2• ' s ! -/A" S -21 ES -03 ERCP 19 X 30 24 0.25% % si ,� 6a \0 1ti' 6 > ' o �� . �, . °« - > 6 >' sa s �3�96 >6 s S -20 S -17 RCP 15" 113 0.20% \ °^\ J - - �a-�X- �hy� -�-- -� - X J 9� - �E�68s, re' - -�`i j'"jr xr, >6 �, _° `�'' - �- 3E-1 -� - d6 J6� \�o I O \0 \ i6 J6 96 O 90 10,90 s o � �� 0 20' X 20' SIGHT o 6 6 \ o S -17 S -14 RCP 18 110 0.20% POND No. 3 N. BETTY LANE VISIBILITY TRI'ANGLE o T.O.B. EL. = 17.50 ON SITE TBM ES -06 S -13 RCP 24" 21 0.20% UNDERDRAIN STRUCTURE TABLE ES -18 S -12 S -11 RCP 15" 119 0.21% D.L.W. EL. _ 16.40 SET N &T � 60' R/W (TYp,) „ o UD- 1 UNDERDRAIN CONC. COLLAR UD- 4 UNDERDRAIN CLEANOUT D.H.W EL. (25)= 17.00 ELEV. = 20.12 N.A.V.D. 88 BENCHMARK o S -10 S -9 RCP 24 10 5.00% W /6' X 4' RIPRAP SPLASH PAD TOP EL. = 17.25 BOTT EL. = 15.50 R Q S -9 S -8 RCP 24" 74 0.53% ELEVATIONS B ED ON N.A.V.D. OF 1988; � INV EL = 13 34 INV EL - 14 75 S -8 ES -01 RCP 24" 28 1.50% UNDERDRAIN LINE TABLE CITY OF CLEAR�VATER "1 -08" ELEVATION 15.6715' ES -07 S -7 RCP 18" 68 0.20% y UD- 2 10" NYLOPLAST DRAIN BASIN UD- 5 UNDERDRAIN CLEANOUT V S -7 S -6 RCP 18" 87 0.20% W /H -20 SOLID LID TOP EL. = 17.25 FROM TO SIZE LENGTH NOTE: • 3 �� o RIM EL. =18.85 INV. EL. =14.75 STIR. # STIR. # TYPE (IN.) (FT.) SLOPE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT TO ENGINEER OF RECORD p ES -08 S -5 RCP 18 131 0.29% INV. EL. = 13.70 UD -5 UD -3 PVC (PERF) 6" 75 0.00% A DEWATERING PLAN PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK. � S-4 S -3 RCP 15" 34 0.29% UD -4 UD -3 PVC PERF 6" 75 0.00% UD- 3 10" NYLOPLAST DRAIN BASIN ( ) FAILURE TO MAINTAIN EROSION PROTECTION AND o S -3 S -2 RCP 18" 120 0.25% UD -3 UD -2 PVC (SOLID) 6" 154 0.40% DISCHARGE TURBIDITY LEVELS IN ACCORDANCE WITH V S -2 S -1 RCP 18" 30 0.33% RIM EL SOLID LID UD -2 UD -1 PVC (SOLID) 6" 90 0.40% PERMIT CONDITIONS WILL RESULT IN ENFORCEMENT ACTION BY THE SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER 1 INV. EL. = 14.75 (E & VV) INV. EL. = 14.32 (N) MANAGEMENT DISTRICT. z W o Z O W 0 W W o B m W • W '_ 40 Z � o Z 3 a � W o Q J LL > o 'a rn o W Z uA m co V6 M W 0 Q y Lr-o Z 0 N /0 w LL. v p F- w3 mod• Q N 7 f0 V y s Z M n N • Z Wo • oj°,CL M Ln Ar • di O 16 o 'o o • `•{f 00 a. H1 vi U IL vi L,_i a: 0 Y Y } Zm m m 3 0 Y a U V W W. A. ad cZ WZ Z O p� gun W z > cc W o0 t9 Z W Z t•- to W W N O 0 z M M 0 :0 CIA L''k V-1 cam.: �• ;; 4: t U I�3a z W o Z O W 0 W W o B m W • W '_ 40 Z � o Z 3 a � W o Q J LL > o 'a rn o W Z uA m co V6 M W 0 Q y Lr-o Z 0 N /0 w LL. v p F- w3 mod• Q N 7 f0 V y s Z M n N • Z Wo • oj°,CL M Ln Ar • di O 16 o 'o o • `•{f 00 a. H1 vi U IL vi L,_i a: 0 Y Y } Zm m m 3 0 Y a U V W W. A. ad cZ WZ Z O p� gun W z > cc W o0 t9 Z W Z t•- to W W N O 0 z M M 0 :0 CIA L''k V-1 cam.: �• ;; 4: t U I�3a 7 f0 V y s Z M n N • Z Wo • oj°,CL M Ln Ar • di O 16 o 'o o • `•{f 00 a. H1 vi U IL vi L,_i a: 0 Y Y } Zm m m 3 0 Y a U V W W. A. ad cZ WZ Z O p� gun W z > cc W o0 t9 Z W Z t•- to W W N O 0 z M M 0 :0 CIA L''k V-1 cam.: �• ;; 4: t U I�3a di O 16 o 'o o • `•{f 00 a. H1 vi U IL vi L,_i a: 0 Y Y } Zm m m 3 0 Y a U V W W. A. ad cZ WZ Z O p� gun W z > cc W o0 t9 Z W Z t•- to W W N O 0 z M M 0 :0 CIA L''k V-1 cam.: �• ;; 4: t U I�3a V W W. A. ad cZ WZ Z O p� gun W z > cc W o0 t9 Z W Z t•- to W W N O 0 z M M 0 :0 CIA L''k V-1 cam.: �• ;; 4: t U I�3a t•- to W W N O 0 z M M 0 :0 CIA L''k V-1 cam.: �• ;; 4: t U I�3a STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN 1.0 SITE DESCRIPTION PHASE III - STORMWATER & UTILITY CONSTRUCTION 1.A. NATURE OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY: INSTALL ROCK BAGS AND SILT FENCE AT THOSE STRUCTURES ( STORMWATER & SANITARY) OFFSET "Ell WHERE RUNOFF MAY LEAVE THE PROJECT SITE. THE SUBJECT PROJECT INVOLVES THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 51 SINGLE FAMILY LOT DEVELOPMENT POND No. 1 WHICH INCLUDES THE UTILITIES (SANITARY & WATER), AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. 2.A.1. STABILIZATION PRACTICES: THE PURPOSE OF THIS PROJECT IS TO PROVIDE A 51 UNIT RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION COMMUNITY. 16.00 5.0' PERMANENT -SOD PROPOSED AREAS IN ACCORDANCE WITH CONSTRUCTION PLANS. 60 ALL STABILIZA1ON PRACTICES SHALL BE INITIATED AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE IN PORTIONS 1.8. SEQUENCE OF MAJOR SOIL DISTURBING ACTIVITY: OF THE SITE WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES HAVE TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY 14.75 CEASED, BUT IN NO CASE MORE THAN 14 DAYS AFTER THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IN THE FOLLOWING SEQUENCE OF MAJOR SOIL DISTURBING ACTIVITIES SHALL BE THAT PORTION OF THE SITE HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED. THE CONTRACTOR FOLLOWED UNLESS THE CONTRACTOR CAN PROPOSE AN ALTERNATIVE THAT IS EQUAL IS ALSO RESPONSIBLE FOR DOCUMENTING THIS PORTION OF THE SWPPP. OR BETTER AT CONTROLLING EROSION AND SEDIMENT AND IS APPROVED BY THE 4 ENGINEER. THE DETAILED SEQUENCE FOR THE EN11RE PROJECT CAN VARY 2.A.2. STRUCTURAL PRACTICES: SIGNIFICANTLY FROM CONTRACTOR TO CONTRACTOR. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE \ FOR PROVIDING A DETAILED SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION TEMPORARY - SILT FENCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF CLEARWATER STANDARDS AND F.D.O.T. INDEX NO. 102. ACTIVITIES IN F.D.O.T. INDEX NO. 102, 103, & 104. STRAW BALES IN ACCORDANCE WITHCITY OF CLEARWATER STANDARDS AND F.D.O.T. INDEX NO. 102. ROCK BAGS IN I�`' I� ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF CLEARWATER STANDARDS AND F.D.O.T. INDEX NO. 102. INLET PROTECTION IN ACCORDANCE A. CLEARING AND GRUBBING WITH CITY OF CLEARWATER STANDARDS AND F.D.O.T. INDEX NO. 102. THE CONTRACTOR IS ALSO RESPONSIBLE B. EXCAVATION AND FILLING OF SITE FOR DOCUMENTING THIS PORTION OF THE SWPPP. C. STORMWATER SYSTEM AND UTILITIES CONSTRUCTION 2.8. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT: D. ROADWAY INFRASTRUCTURE CONSTRUCTION GRADE 1.C. AREA ESTIMATES: TOTAL PROJECT AREA = 8.89 AC. EXISTING STORMWATER FLOWS SHALL BE MAINTAINED DURING AND AFTER CONSTRUCTION. TOTAL AREA TO BE DISTURBED = 7.89 AC. I I 2.C. OTHER CONTROLS: 1.D. RUNOFF DATA: v RUNOFF COEFFICIENT: 2.C.1. WASTE DISPOSAL BEFORE: CN 87.2 2.C.2. OFFSITE VEHICLE TRACKING AFTER: CN 87.8 2.C.3. STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS FOR WASTE DISPOSAL, SANITARY SEWER, OR SEPTIC TANK REGULATIONS. SOIL DATA: SOIL BORINGS OBTAINED BY THE CLIENT INDICATED THAT IN GENERAL, THE Z SOILS WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS CONSIST OF SILTY AND FINE SANDS. FOR ITEMS ABOVE: THE CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR DOCUMENTING THIS PORTION OF THE SWPPP. DRAINAGE AREAS: 2.C.4. FERTILIZERS AND PESTICIDES: 1.E. SITE MAP FERTILIZER WILL BE APPLIED ACCORDING TO APPLICABLE SUBSECTIONS OF EITHER SECTION THE PROJECT PLAN SHEETS WILL SERVE AS THE SITE MAPS FOR THE SWPPP. THE 570 OR 577 OF THE FDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR DOCUMENTING THIS PORTION OF THE SWPPP. TYPICAL SECTIONS AND DETAILS, IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE CROSS SECTIONS WILL DEPICT THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 2.D.4. APPROVED STATE AND LOCAL PLANS AND PERMITS: DRAINAGE PATTERNS - EXISTING DRAINAGE PATTERNS WILL BE MAINTAINED DURING PERMITS REQUIRED: 1) SWFWMD PERMIT AND AFTER CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS. UPON COMPLETION OF THE STORMWATER SYSTEM, A MAJORITY OF THE SITE WILL BE DIRECTED TO DETENTION PONDS. 2) F.D.E.P POTABLE WATER PERMIT (SEE OVERALL DRAINAGE PLAN). 3) F.D.E.P WASTEWATER PERMIT SLOPES - THE SLOPES OF THE PROJECT CAN BE FOUND IN THE TYPICAL SECTIONS / AND DETAILS. 3.0 MAINTENANCE GRAD ITEM MAINTENANCE REPLACEMENT INTERVAL AREAS OF SOIL DISTURBANCE - THE AREAS WHICH WILL EXPERIENCE SOIL DISTURBING ACTIVITIES ARE DEPICTED ON THE PAVING, GRADING, AND DRAINAGE PLAN SHEETS AND BALED HAY IN ACCORDANCE WITH 3 MONTHS TYPICAL SECTIONS AND DETAILS. F.D.O.T. STANDARD INDEX #102 REMOVE SEDIMENT WHEN IT REACHES AREAS NOT TO BE DISTURBED - REFER TO PAVING, GRADING, & DRAINAGE PLAN SHEETS. HEIGHT OF BALES. LOCATIONS OF CONTROL AND AREAS TO BE STABILIZED - ALL SANITARY AND DRAINAGE STRUCTURES WILL HAVE HAY BALE PROTECTION AS DESCRIBED IN THE F.D.O.T. STANDARD SILT FENCE IN IN ACCORDANCE O ACCRDA NCE WITH CITY OF INDEXES. ALL DITCHES WILL HAVE CHECK DAMS SPACED ACCORDING TO SOIL TYPE AND STANDARDS. 1 YEAR SLOPE, AND ALL FILL SLOPES WILL HAVE SILT FENCE PLACED AT THE BASE OF THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS AS DESCRIBED IN THE PLAN SHEETS AND FOOT STANDARD INDEXES. TURBIDITY BARRIER IN ACCORDANCE WITH F.D.O.T. INDEX PERMANENT SOIL STABILIZATION MEASURES ARE INDICATED ON THE TYPICAL SECTIONS AND DETAILS. N0. 103. 1 YEAR SURFACE WATERS - TURBIDITY BARRIERS TO BE PLACED PER F.D.O.T. INDEX NO. 103. ROCK BAGS IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF DISCHARGE POINTS TO SURFACE WATERS - TURBIDITY BARRIERS TO BE PLACED PER F.D.O.T. INDEX N0. 103. CLEARWATER STANDARDS. 1 YEAR 2.0 CONTROLS 4.0 INSPECTIONS 2.A. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS: QUALIFIED PERSONNEL SHALL INSPECT THE FOLLOWING ITEMS AT LEAST ONCE EVERY SEVEN THE FOLLOWING DEFINES THE GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR THE SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION CALENDAR DAYS AND WITHIN 24 HOURS OF THE END OF A STORM THAT IS 0.25 INCHES OR ACTIVITIES AND THE USE OF STABILIZATION AND STRUCTURAL PRACTICES. THE CONTRACTOR GREATER. WHERE SITES HAVE BEEN FINALLY STABILIZED, INSPECTIONS SHALL BE CONDUCTED IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DOCUMENTING THIS PORTION OF THE SWPPP IN PAVING, GRADING, AND AT LEAST ONCE EVERY MONTH. & DRAINAGE PLAN SHEETS. THE SUBSEQUENT ITEMS PRESENTED HEREIN ARE DETAILED IN THE "FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD AND BRIDGE A. POINTS OF DISCHARGE TO WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES. CONSTRUCTION ", F.D.OT. STANDARD INDEXES AND THE CITY OF CLEARWATER'S STANDARDS & B. DISTURBED AREAS OF THE SITE THAT HAVE NOT BEEN FINALLY STABILIZED. SPECIFICATIONS. C. AREAS USED FOR STORAGE OF MATERIALS THAT ARE EXPOSED TO PRECIPITATION. D. STRUCTURAL CONTROLS. PHASE I - CLEARING & GRUBBING PLAN E. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS. INSTALL HAY BALES, ROCK BAGS, AND SILT FENCE AT THOSE AREAS CLEARED AND F. LOCATIONS WHERE VEHICLED ENTER OR EXIT THE SITE. GRUBBED WHERE RUNOFF MAY LEAVE THE PROJECT. 5.0 NON STORMWATER DISCHARGES PHASE II - EXCAVATION & FILL PLAN INSTALL ROCK BAGS AND SILT FENCE AT THOSE AREAS EXCAVATED AND FILLED WHERE THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DOCUMENTING THIS PORTION OF THE SWPPP. RUNOFF MAY LEAVE THE PROJECT SITE. ENCOUNTERED, CONTACT THE LOCAL HAZARDOUS MATERIALS COORDINATOR. SAND -GROWN SOD NO TRIMMINGS IN E POND BOTTOM N O 0 N CLEANOUT ® BOTH ENDS (TYP) PLACTIC CAP W/ INVERTED LUGS. PROVIDE 1.5'x1.5' - 4" THICK CONCRETE COLLAR AROUND CLEANOUT- 6.0' POND #1 2.6' POND #3 LIMITS OF LINE ,•F�� DO NOT SOD D.L.W. = "A" POND BOTTOM = "B" LIMITS OF LINER 2. MIN. Q SAND FILTER MEDIUM (EFFECTIVE i GRAIN SIZE 0.20 TO 0.55 U.C. OF 1.5 3 OR GREATER, K =5.42 FT /HOUR -AVG) N (NON- CALCAREOUS)* 30 MIL PVC LINER TO BE PLACED THE FULL LENGTH OF THE h INFILTRATION UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM 0 z s c� Z 0 c� 00 0 0 0 i c a 3 O V 0 e T.O.B. EL = "D" 12.0 I.E. EL = "C" `,�_6" PERFORATED PVC UD (NON- CORRUGATED) CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT SAMPLE OF FILTER * NO SLAG OR LIMESTONE ALLOWED (CALCIUM SAND AND LOCATION OF SOURCE TO AN CARBONATE CONTENT MAX =2.0 %) APPROVED SOIL LAB FOR SIEVE ANALYSIS AND PERMEABILITY TEST, AND CALCIUM CARBONATE CONTENT TEST. UNDERDRAIN INFILTRATION SYSTEM DETAIL NTS ESM'T. ESM'T. 1 NOTE. CONTRACTOR HAS OPTION OF SUBMITTNG ALTERNATE MATERIAL DESIGN TO ENGINEER OF RECORD FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO FABRICATION SKIMMER - SEE DETAIL BELOW a "8 _,j 'A " TOP OF-1 SKIMMER TYPE "0" DITCH BOTTOM INLET (MODIFIED) F. D. 0. T. INDEX #232 STEEL GRATE PER 4" THK. CONC, PAD C F. D. 0. T. INDEX 1232 SET " - CUT" IBM AT THE POND BOTTOM CORNER OF THE STRUCTURE UPON ELEV a 13.00 COMPLETION OF CONS7RUCTION SECURE SKIMMER WITH 112" x 2 -314" LOK BOLT - R4WL STUD 17420 OR APPR. QL f^ STRUCTURE DETAIL ELEVATION DESIGN H. W.S. EL. (25 YR.) = 15.00 -TOP OF STRUCTURE SECTION "A - A" CONNECT 6" PVC (NON -PERF) UNDERDRAIN O /NV EL. 1225 118" FIBERGLASS OR GALVANIZED STEEL SIR. NO. 21 OIL & GREASE SKIMMER 1.0' (MIN.) A ' A A 4" 7HKK, X 4.33' 4.0' CONC. SLAB (7YP. BOTH SIDES) PLAN STR. N0. DLW "All ,.B.. UD CL ..C.. T.O.B. "D„ OFFSET "Ell CLEANOUT "Flo LENGTH (LF) POND No. 1 14.50 13.00 12.25 16.00 5.0' 15.25 60 POND No. 37 16.15 15.50 14.75 17.50 5.0' 17.25 150 UNDERDRAIN INFILTRATION SYSTEM DETAIL NTS ESM'T. ESM'T. 1 NOTE. CONTRACTOR HAS OPTION OF SUBMITTNG ALTERNATE MATERIAL DESIGN TO ENGINEER OF RECORD FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO FABRICATION SKIMMER - SEE DETAIL BELOW a "8 _,j 'A " TOP OF-1 SKIMMER TYPE "0" DITCH BOTTOM INLET (MODIFIED) F. D. 0. T. INDEX #232 STEEL GRATE PER 4" THK. CONC, PAD C F. D. 0. T. INDEX 1232 SET " - CUT" IBM AT THE POND BOTTOM CORNER OF THE STRUCTURE UPON ELEV a 13.00 COMPLETION OF CONS7RUCTION SECURE SKIMMER WITH 112" x 2 -314" LOK BOLT - R4WL STUD 17420 OR APPR. QL f^ STRUCTURE DETAIL ELEVATION DESIGN H. W.S. EL. (25 YR.) = 15.00 -TOP OF STRUCTURE SECTION "A - A" CONNECT 6" PVC (NON -PERF) UNDERDRAIN O /NV EL. 1225 118" FIBERGLASS OR GALVANIZED STEEL SIR. NO. 21 OIL & GREASE SKIMMER 1.0' (MIN.) A ' A A 4" 7HKK, X 4.33' 4.0' CONC. SLAB (7YP. BOTH SIDES) PLAN STR. N0. »A» , +B» + +C ++ »D++ + +E /+ , +F ++ »G» »H» »11+ S -21 15.00 15.00 14.00 14.50 13.00 9.43 19 X 30 ERCP 3.5 12.25 NOTE. CONTRACTOR HAS OP77ON OF SUBMITTING ALTERNATE MATER /AL DESIGN TO ENGINEER OF RECORD FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO FABRICATION STEEL GRATE PER F.O.O. T. INDEX #232 SET "NAIL & DISK" (7BM) AT 7HE CORNER OF THE STRUCTURE UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUC7ON DATUM ELEV 8.0 20.0 STAKE SCREEI 16.0 / MEET & 1 EXIST. Gf / 12.0 POND CROSS SECTION 173 -P3" SCALE- I" = 10' HORIZ. R/W ESM'T. 40' DRAINAGE EASEMENT »B» EXISTING -Do' &AINAGE EASEMENT + +F++ »G" S -6 17.00 PINELAND 15.90 16.40 .0' 8.0' VARIES - SEE PAVING & GRADIN PLAN 8.0' 5.0' ' 9.0' 12.0' A<3 r 10.1 ��'F90 EXIST. GRADE 4 �/ CD .o� \ g• r / = s T 06 I�`' I� 9.0' 12.0' 0.0 I eo % I I GRADE .�• e'�F OcN > I I 160i- DATUM ELEV 8.0 20.0 STAKE SCREEI 16.0 / MEET & 1 EXIST. Gf / 12.0 POND CROSS SECTION 173 -P3" SCALE- I" = 10' HORIZ. R/W ESM'T. DATUM ELEV TO BE FIELD VERIFIED 8.0 POND CROSS SECTION "PIA -PIA" SCALE. III = 10' HORIZ. 1 " = 4.0' VERT. 20.0 16.0 12.0 20.0 - 16.0 12.0 + 1�1 •t;0 'A " OUTFALL CONTROL STRUCTURE DETAIL STRUCTURE S -21 ® POND 1 61D "C" DITCH BOTTOM INLET TOP OF-\ IFIED) F. D. O. T. INDEX #232 SKIMMER B. B� M SKIMMER - SEE POND BOTTOM "C" DETAIL BELOW ELEV. 15.50 4" 7HK. CONC. PAD - M STRUCTURE DETAIL STRUCTURE NO. S -6 ® POND 3 SECURE SKIMMER W H 112" x 2 -314" LOK BOLT - R4WL STUD 17420 OR APPR. CONNECT 6" PVC (NON -PERF) UNDERDI ® 1W.. EL. 14.75 ELEVATION DESIGN H. W. S. EL. (25 YR.) = 17.00 24" RCP -70P OF STRUCTURE SECTION "A - A" 4" THK. X 283' CO, SLAB 118" f7BERGLASS OR GALVANIZED S7EEL OIL & GREASE SKIMMER A A N PLAN 1. 0' (M /N.) STR. N0. 40' DRAINAGE EASEMENT »B» EXISTING -Do' »E» + +F++ »G" S -6 17.00 PINELAND 15.90 16.40 2.5' 14.90 (1) 24" RCP Z DRIVE 2. ' 9.0' 12.0' 00 e'QF 10.1 ��'F90 0� 4 �/ CD � 1� Av \ g• r / = s T 06 12.0' 9.0' 12.0' 0.0 I 12: A :D SILT I EXIST. GRADE I I e'�F OcN > O I FENCE 160i- ca v W i' O O rn W Z Lu m ao rn n u, �`'r > / �6 o a \ v / 0� EXIST GRAD HATCH W ADES 1'S .�• B j o 7 EXIST. GRADE-/ I w v EX. PVC UD PIPE (APPROY IOrATIf1N) DATUM ELEV TO BE FIELD VERIFIED 8.0 POND CROSS SECTION "PIA -PIA" SCALE. III = 10' HORIZ. 1 " = 4.0' VERT. 20.0 16.0 12.0 20.0 - 16.0 12.0 + 1�1 •t;0 'A " OUTFALL CONTROL STRUCTURE DETAIL STRUCTURE S -21 ® POND 1 61D "C" DITCH BOTTOM INLET TOP OF-\ IFIED) F. D. O. T. INDEX #232 SKIMMER B. B� M SKIMMER - SEE POND BOTTOM "C" DETAIL BELOW ELEV. 15.50 4" 7HK. CONC. PAD - M STRUCTURE DETAIL STRUCTURE NO. S -6 ® POND 3 SECURE SKIMMER W H 112" x 2 -314" LOK BOLT - R4WL STUD 17420 OR APPR. CONNECT 6" PVC (NON -PERF) UNDERDI ® 1W.. EL. 14.75 ELEVATION DESIGN H. W. S. EL. (25 YR.) = 17.00 24" RCP -70P OF STRUCTURE SECTION "A - A" 4" THK. X 283' CO, SLAB 118" f7BERGLASS OR GALVANIZED S7EEL OIL & GREASE SKIMMER A A N PLAN 1. 0' (M /N.) STR. N0. »A++ »B» »C» -Do' »E» + +F++ »G" S -6 17.00 17.00 15.90 16.40 2.5' 14.90 (1) 24" RCP OUTFALL CONTROL STRUCTURE DETAIL STRUCTURE NO. 6 ® POND NO. 3 20.0 STA SCRE 16.0 12.0 DATUM ELEV R/W ESM'T. 20.0 16. D 12.0 z H o E Z O W Lu N > W � 0 m 40' DRAINAGE EAS MENT EXISTING M K. W 42 V 000 ^ PINELAND W �, r- N Z DRIVE KED SILT EN FENCE 2.0' 0 I O 16'0 .1 12.0' 9.0' 12.0' 00 e'QF 10.1 0� rn �/ CD � 1� Av \ g• r / = s T 06 a BEET & MATC EXIST. GRADES I o / PDX" o EXIST GRAD A~ EXIST. GRADE I I 20.0 16. D 12.0 z H o E Z O W Lu N > W � 0 m dl O 16 W w oz coo �z N W CD 0) f •.:�� , . ,t iT to n O ' .14J , 0040 {O � $ lk`N vi �:.� ,; w a � Y Y m m m zzo 0 o o W N coo M K. W 42 V 000 ^ m W �, r- N Z �° OLO _ Z ,a o0 rd q 'ern 0� rn �/ CD 3 Z = a • W o - s S 44 A~ }'j = o c. a. W6 > O Ln ca v W i' a o O rn W Z Lu m ao rn n u, M > > W o a v 0 Z m 0 W CL 7 w 3 c°c .t d N U dl O 16 W w oz coo �z N W CD 0) f •.:�� , . ,t iT to n O ' .14J , 0040 {O � $ lk`N vi �:.� ,; w a � Y Y m m m zzo 0 o o U) '= m 42 V �a m •� r: N t� M u1 OLO _ Z M L D. rd q 'ern 0� rn N E� W • Q Z - s S coo • }'j = o c. a. Lu m • Ln Z T� dl O 16 W w oz coo �z N W CD 0) f •.:�� , . ,t iT to n O ' .14J , 0040 {O � $ lk`N vi �:.� ,; w a � Y Y m m m zzo 0 o o 8.0 POND CROSS SECTION "PI B -PI B" o 0 z pp SCALE- 1" = 10' HORIZ. % M qrm ? 0 W • U) W Z �a OLO W Z Q - s S fl.4' "'� E Lt• LL1 Lu ca �m Z T� W Z ao d. V Cd W 7 c°c d 8.0 POND CROSS SECTION "PI B -PI B" o 0 z pp SCALE- 1" = 10' HORIZ. % M qrm ? 0 W • - er MATERIALS' 8" BRICK 6" CONCI #4 0 12" #4 HOOPS CRTS REINFORCING BE IN CENTER OF CONCRETE Flared End Section 12" - 72" Diameter Pipe o Tongue End For Inlet ii if Groove End For Outlet Wall Plan View Thickness B Slope o A 4artinn 1 /iaw at (:antarlina Hydro Conduit Division Installation Detail End View Pipe Inner Diameter (inches) wall Thickness (inches) A (inches) B (inches) C (inches) D (inches) E (inches) Slope 12 2 4 24 47/8 727/8 30 3:1 15 21/4 6 27 46 73 30 3:1 18 21/2 9 27 46 73 36 3:1 24 3 91/2 431/2 30 731/2 48 3:1 30 1 31/2 12 1 54 193/4 1 733/4 60 3:1 36 4 15 63 343/4 973/4 72 3:1 42 41/2 21 63 35 98 78 3:1 48 5 24 72 26 98 84 3:1 54 51/2 27 65 35 100 90 2.41 60 6 30 1 60 39 99 96 2:1 66 61/2 32 1 78 21 99 102 2:1 72 7 34 78 21 99 108 2:1 Dimensions may vary depending upon equipment availability. Notes: 1. Produced to meet ASTM specifications. 2. Contact a Hydro Conduit representative for further details not listed on this sheet. FLARED END SECTION i BOTH WAYS ALTERNATE A 2 -"6 ALL 0 _ o z J N Q w z W I IN- cn O o_ Z 9 I= WOZ��i a:z ENO o0 OZ (n W, 0 W WaFjcN� J Z Z Z w o m w� 12 to(=Um?2 m g 1 2 O m ■r w 0 Q 2 ZZ =0 � U 0Z a0 ZW U W N �0 W Z 0a Z� = fN 0 0 Z apw m U LLJ X 0(X00 PLAN TYPE "A" NOSING r s CEMENT PLASTER Pipe I.D. . SECTION C -C 40_ . 101 Poo NOSING-\ GUTTER I IN N 1 ESTIMATED 0 UANTITIES RESULTS USING 1% SWALES a� SIN ITEM UNIT QUAN TITY CLASS ' II' CONCRETE Cu Yd 0.622 REINFORCING STEEL Lbs 78 NOSING 3 CHANNEL 0 41 Lbs 20 NOTE: estimated Quantities are given for Dimensions shown. M TOP OF CURB (BACK SIDE) UTTER 12" I N RESULTS USING 1% SWALES a� SIN N M I . PLAN OF COVER TYPE "A -1" PROVIDE 2' DIA. MANHOLE FRAME AND COVER CONCRETE - All concrete shall be CLASS "A" REINFORCING STEEL - Reinforcing steel to comply with the ASTM Specifications A -15 the Engineer shall be given an opportunity to review the placing of steel prior to pouring of concrete. BRICK - Brick shall consist of one part Portland Cement, and three parts of Diamor Send or equal, or one part Portland Cement, one part Masonry Cement, and six parts of Diamond Sand or equal. Where conditions do not permit these type of Inlets special design must be approved by the County Engineer. CURBING - Length of E special curbing required for construction of these Inlets shall be included under the Pay Item of Curb and Gutter of the project. (n 81f „X" W_ � 1 /2 "cement w p4kter N 6" � 1 61, miri\ min 8" � TYPICAL FRONT NOTE: Nosing Channel shall be golvenized after fabrication. ELEVATION OF SECTION A -A INLET AND CURB NOTE: Dimension o will m NOSING CHANNEL DETAIL le to accommodate laargrger r pipe as required. "X" & "Y" DIMENSIONS Is DIM. DEPTH "A" DEPTH "B" DEPTH "C" ",q -1" "A -2,► "A -3" 1#13-11P "B 2" "C -1 "x" 2' -8" 4' -0" V -0" (SINGLE WING) (DOUBLE WING) (SINGLE WING) "Y" 4' -0" 5' -4" 6' -4" Rinker 024 MAX. PIPE SIZE 1s" 36" 48" CURB INLET TYPE CHART IN SIDE OF BOX N.T.S. VALLEY GUTTER INLET TYPE " w FILLET EACH CORNER NOTE #7 r 3'6" 1 PLAN 2 -#6 CORNER FILLET ALL AROUND #4 0 12" CTRS. BOTH WAYS TYPE P MANHOLE FOR INLETS, MANHOLES AND JUNCTION BOXES N.T.S. t JI-m� #4 0 9" CTRS. IE ALTERNATE B ~ m O J W L X o O M o wZ W Q <X vwiowa I z re woZMWZ tz .5 o 0 rn UJ Naowc°�W ZZ � D M W Z j F- x 00z W� to in WAYS in iE CL W 0 2 =0 � U Q Z IY O U O W � 0 Wcr Z oa Z:i O Ww C;_- _J Z a0W Mow w Ram 3' -4" 2" 12" 4 " 2" GENERAL NOTES V, ;n -N 2" --� 1. These inlets are suitable for bicycle and pedestrian areas and are to be used in ditches, medians and other areas subject to infrequent traffic loadings but are not to be placed in areas M 2 - -I subject to any heavy wheel loads.' LO s 2 0 -- 2; rT M 2. Inlets subject to minimal debris should be constructed without slots. Where debris is a problem inlets should be constructed with V) 0 8" g" slots. Slotted inlets located within roadway clear zones and in areas accessible to pedestrians shall have traversable slots. The o �° N � �N traversable slot modification is not adaptable to inlet Type H. N , II II Slots may be constructed at either or both ends as shown on Z ao 12� r� ""11"12„ plans. x PLAN 3. Steel grates are to be used on all inlets where bicycle traffic is TYPE C anticipated. Steel grates are to be used on all inlets with M.E traversable slots. Either cast iron or steel grates may be used on o 3,_4.. �„ Approx. Weight 235 Lbs. inlets without slots where bicycle traffic is not anticipated. Either > to t° 54" u 54 cast iron or steel grates may be used on all inlets with f� � 5„ whentAlternateeG slots. grate is specified In ne selection either he steel N Grate T 2' -3g grate, hot dipped galvanized after fabrication, or the cast iron 0 1- grate may be used, unless the plans stipulate the particular type. 2" CI. Eye Bolt See Index 201 01!! 4. Recommended maximum pipe sizes shown are for concrete pipe. iri ®nlm Pipe sizes larger than those recommended must be checked for 3' N Mom y ® 4 "' #4 Bars ® j v a o 5. All exposed corners and edges of concrete are to be chamfered v m 12" Ctrs. iv cn m m `* `n 6. Pavement to be used on inlets without slots and inlets with SECTION non - traversable slots only when called for in the plans; but TYP E C TYPE C 3' contra t unit Ipri price for nlets. Quantities osho n barenfordinformation Straight Bars 2 "x 18 onl y . Recommended Maximum Pipe Size: Reticuline Bars 14 x 18' 2'-0" Wall -18 " Pipe Bands 12 "x; 7. Traversable slots constructed in existing inlets shall be paid for as 3 -1 Wall -24 " Pipe Approx. Weight 100 Lbs. inlets partial, and shall include the cost for slot openings, paving and any required replacement grates. 8. Sodding to be used on all inlets not located in paved areas and NOTICE: Steel Grates Are Required On Inlets With Traversable Slots And On paid for under contract unit price for Sodding SY. Inlets where Bicycle Traffic Is Anticipated. 9. For supplementary details see Index No. 201. TYPE 'C" DITCH BOTTOM INLET DETAIL N.T.S. 1- 1 1 SAX stagy \a 9pF LOT GRADING TYPE A ALL DRAINAGE TO STREET SAMPLE COMPUTATION OF GRADING CONTROL LINE A -F FOR A 60' LOT ON A 0.5% STREET, WITH 28' BUILDING DEPTH RESULTS USING 1% SWALES A CURB -TOP ON LOT -LINE EXTENSION AT HIGH LOT CORNER A -B PARKWAY SLOPE: 12' GRASS AND WALK AT 1 /4 " /ft. (2 %) A -B PARKWAY SLOPE: 12' GRASS AND WALK AT 1 /4 " /ft. (2 %) 3" 0.3' B -C SIDE SWALE: 56' GRASS AT 1. /4 " /ft. (2 %) 7" 0.6' C -D SWALE TURN WITH 10' RADIUS: 16' GRASS AT 1 /4 " /ft. 2" 0.2' D -E* *REAR SWALE: 13' GRASS AT 1 /4 " /ft. (2 %) 1" 0.1'� E -F* PROTECTIVE REAR SLOPE IS FROM HIGHH POINT OF SWALES 3" 0.3 ) SUB -TOTAL A -F FROM CURB -TOP TO GROUND AT REAR BLDG. WALL 16" 1.4'� MINIMUM RISE FROM CURB TOP TO SLAB FLOOR: 27" + 8" 24" 2.0 MINIMUM RISE FOR WOOD FLOOR USING 8" JOISTS: 27" + 19" 35" 2.9'; * WHERE THERE IS A HIGH BANK NEARBY OR A LONG SLOPE TOWARD HOUSE, Oa.. U a- (N A MINIMUM 6" PROTECTIVE SLOPE IS REQUIRED. Y ** LENGTH D -E - 1/2 [LOT WIDTH -(2 x SWALE TURN RADIUS) - (LOTWIDTH) • x STREET GRADIENT + SWALE GRADIENT)] • 5 ZU Y TYPE "A" LOT GRADING DETAIL N.T.S. Q � � go © SIDE SLOPE LOT GRADING TYPE B �@ DRAINAGE BOTH TO STREET A AND REAR LOT LINE SAMPLE COMPUTATION OF GRADING CONTROL LINE A -D FOR A 60' LOT WITH 28' BUILDING DEPTH RESULTS USING 1% SWALES A CURB -TOP ON LOT -LINE EXTENSION AT HIGH LOT CORNER A -B PARKWAY SLOPE: 12' GRASS AND WALK AT 1 /4 " /ft. (2 %) 3" 0.3' B -C SIDE SWALE: 56' GRASS AT 1 /4 " /ft. (2%) 7" 0.6' C -D* PROTECTIVE SIDE SLOPE AT EXTENSION OF REAR WALL 3" 0.3' SUB -TOTAL A -D FROM CURB -TOP TO GROUND OF REAR BLDG. WALL 13" (1.1 MINIMUM RISE FROM CURB -TOP TO SLAB FLOOR: 20" + 8" 21" 1.8' MINIMUM RISE FOR WOOD -FLOOR USING 8" JOISTS: 20" + 19" 32" (2.7) * WHERE THERE IS A HIGH BANK NEARBY OR A LONG SLOPE TOWARD HOUSE, A MINIMUM 6" PROTECTIVE SLOPE IS REQUIRED. TYPE "B" LOT GRADING DETAIL STORM X -ING DETAIL NO. 1 STORM X -ING DETAIL NO. 3 STORM X -ING DETAIL NO. 5 N N.T.S. GRADE ELEV. = 18.9 0 O 6" PVC M 1y9 Q WATERMAIN 6' PVC SOLID TOA 2 U.D. LINE 1� ��v ri 10.23 T.O.P. 9. SAN. sECVV. ��• SERVICE STORM X -ING DETAIL NO. 2 ZADE ELEV. = 19.0 h NA 0. R C.P. v cV '� PV SAN. SEEW. STORM X -ING DETAIL NO. 4 Z H o E = u ao O ° N Ul W e oC ° m do G tV W� °'� Z = o a°c 12 Z 3 a W Z SIM o L6 O S V 49 rn V r- W Z LU t MEN IN n u, M W o a y 0 Ir R Z O 1� CL 3 N U a 0 CK W ..,.W O Z °r0 a %W Go M V Ld 000, �.^�' a EH to to Jo r n un � O Ln Z M IN o. _e rn Z7X Oy- e�i`o� �.. 0 ' U: a r; Oa.. U a- (N N O1� Y • tA z ^ wo • 5 ZU Y oaa M • U N AW a 0 CK W ..,.W O Z °r0 a %W Go m Ld 000, �.^�' a '. to Jo � O W Z7X N Vi O Oa.. U a- (N W a 6 Y Y r M m m 5 ZU Y W U) CIO U d Z a Go m A W � O W N N CIO (a WZ �Q3 O Z � 10 W V y J [ , Z_ o �Wd 9 `=A_3 W ..13 a c, L:. Z Z W A U f- 96 � O W 0 OBI: L V d Z a Go m W � O W N V 41# Drop at All Drives 5" 1" C 1 -1/2 "R Wearing Surface ^ x S 6" 2" 0 o / : P .. ; :a, cV Base Q_ LLi a'� t . . Compacted. . . . v Subgrade • • •/ • � M \ • ' � / \ \'T%� Z !!�n STRAIGHT CURB V NOTE: When used on high side of roadways, the cross slope of the gutter shall match the cross slope of the adjacent pavement and the thickness of the lip shall be 6 ", unless otherwise shown on plans. TYPE I CURB Back of Curb NOTES: e a Construction Symmetrical � 1. There shall be a 1/2" seal joint between About Driveway � back of curb and driveway. 2. Concrete in curbs shall be 3000 psi, with Face of N Wearing fiber mesh reinforcing. Curb Surface CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORI 3' TRANSITION A T DRIVES PUBLIC wENGINEERNGISTRATI REMAMN BY 1" at All Drives Wearing Surface /\ 6 ". • . • ' ; 18" v Base Compacted Subgrade NOTES: MODIFIED CURB 1. There shall be a 1/2" seal joint between back of curb 5" 1" 2. Concrete indcurbs shall 1 -1 / 2 "R be 3000 psi, with fiber #3 Bar mesh reinforcing. Cont. :a. Wearing Surface j 6„ ' #3 Bar, 10" Long, 36" O.C. j Base Compacted Subgrade I ---- r— PIN / DOWELLED CURB ti d:`e alp QO lie, '! eee•� o< � A surface require. to Note & C 1" Drop at Wearing All Drives a Surface 3/4 "R /' v z p.•;;A :.: : :a:: ::Q; ::•: ::: ::: n P;:• (° :::Q - 4.:::c': Base ,� , .. 6"- 12 -12 Compacted �% \�-� ' Subgrade VALLEY GUTTER CURB 3/4 "R �+ Wearing Surface 3/4 "R.: is Base �. 6 ". - ' Compacted Subgrade MEDIAN CURB Remove Curb if Existing Exist Cone Drive I Max Slope 12 01» I" 12" Max Slope 1/2" Exp. Joint 1/2" �Exp. Joint 6" TYPICAL DRIVEWAY CROSS SECTION Ea o '- '� R 0 0 4' Min Residential Street I' City R/W Remove Back of Curb on State or Vertical Curbs with a vertical Saw cut !! 2 o° 5' Min Arterial Street 2' County R/ or Remove entire Curb and Replace as Part of Sidewalk Ramp. M iv F- Modified and Valley Gutter Curbs 1/4" per Foot Join exist back of curb 12" Textured Surface I» 0 Max Slope Back of Curb 3000 psi conc 4" thick. Constr. 6" • `r thick at driveways with 6x6 £10 ' Remove to an welded wire mesh. See note 7. . �I /2' Expansion Joint even Joint or sawcut SECTION A —A NOTES= I. Provide tooled joints at distances matching the width. Also place expansion joints at driveways. 2. If some physical obstruction exists which prevents the placing of sidewalks as shown, contact the Engineering Division for alternate location. 3 Wooden and other spacers will not be permitted In sidewalks or driveways. 4. No coatings of any kind will be permitted an concrete sidewalks or driveways without specific approval of the City Engineer. & All concrete shall be 3000 psi min. 0 28 days, with fiber mesh reinforcing. 6. Concrete surface to be light broom finish. T. Concrete driveway construction shall be 6" thick w 6x6 /10x10 welded wire mesh reinforcement. SECTION B —B & Ramps shall have o tactile surface, textured to a depth not exceeding 1/8" by use of tamp or roner In conformance with requirements of FOOT Roadway and Traffic Design Standards, Dotal 304 or most recent modifications. 4' Tiq. S' RI ZIP Ctt'�`•�.�gGiG G,Q - ' 6 ._ m c °.r � 'Qi soyj, .ocZ. �� •.� 9 If x "" Is less than 48" then the slope of the flared side shall not exceed 12:1. ISOMETRIC VIEW CURB DROP CURB TRANSITION f CURB I TRANSITION I BACK OF SIDEWALK FLOW LINE ELEVATION A -A NOTES* mps are designed to the Uniform Federal Accessibility Standards to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act. 2. Ramps Shall Have a Tactile Surface, Textured to a Depth Not Exceeding 1/8" by use of Tamp or roller In Conformance with Requirements of FDOT Roadway and Traffic Design Standards, Detall 304 Or Most Recent Modifications. Match Existing If CONC. SIDEWALK Gross Planting or Other Existing Sidewalk Non - Walking Surface Grass Planting or Other Non - Walking Surface 4'/5' RAMP CURB 6t.- 6" 6" Vertical Curb in Transition 2' R ,I K Exist. Type 1 Curb Remove Back of Curb Flow Line if Existing RETURNED CURB RAMPS VALLEY GUTTER CURB CONC. RAMP Textured Surface 1. A. 4 4' 12:1 MAX. SECTION B —B r-fth E. Storm Access JAS; Ring & Cove See Index 1203 1. Non traffic bearing. AddlUonal /4 2 11hen pipe diameter exceeds 30', inlets shall not Rebar As Shown be used as Junction boxes, limit 3 pipes per inlet (Typ•) /4 Reber 6" O.C. Each Wa (TYp•) 3'-0' Trans. (TYp•) 4" Drop at All Drives C 2 "R V S 6" 2" M CA Wearing .• LLi a'� t 000 v 3 "R � M Surface Z !!�n o 1 OLa �+- V Z C3 F Q 3 :::p:. ip W Z o Y 4X J ~ . • :.c:: • :3/4 R ~ L6 111111 > O OCLa of Cd v Base WZ N LL1 u- oUA o rn t` W Z Compacted Subgrade' NOTE: When used on high side of roadways, the cross slope of the gutter shall match the cross slope of the adjacent pavement and the thickness of the lip shall be 6 ", unless otherwise shown on plans. TYPE I CURB Back of Curb NOTES: e a Construction Symmetrical � 1. There shall be a 1/2" seal joint between About Driveway � back of curb and driveway. 2. Concrete in curbs shall be 3000 psi, with Face of N Wearing fiber mesh reinforcing. Curb Surface CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORI 3' TRANSITION A T DRIVES PUBLIC wENGINEERNGISTRATI REMAMN BY 1" at All Drives Wearing Surface /\ 6 ". • . • ' ; 18" v Base Compacted Subgrade NOTES: MODIFIED CURB 1. There shall be a 1/2" seal joint between back of curb 5" 1" 2. Concrete indcurbs shall 1 -1 / 2 "R be 3000 psi, with fiber #3 Bar mesh reinforcing. Cont. :a. Wearing Surface j 6„ ' #3 Bar, 10" Long, 36" O.C. j Base Compacted Subgrade I ---- r— PIN / DOWELLED CURB ti d:`e alp QO lie, '! eee•� o< � A surface require. to Note & C 1" Drop at Wearing All Drives a Surface 3/4 "R /' v z p.•;;A :.: : :a:: ::Q; ::•: ::: ::: n P;:• (° :::Q - 4.:::c': Base ,� , .. 6"- 12 -12 Compacted �% \�-� ' Subgrade VALLEY GUTTER CURB 3/4 "R �+ Wearing Surface 3/4 "R.: is Base �. 6 ". - ' Compacted Subgrade MEDIAN CURB Remove Curb if Existing Exist Cone Drive I Max Slope 12 01» I" 12" Max Slope 1/2" Exp. Joint 1/2" �Exp. Joint 6" TYPICAL DRIVEWAY CROSS SECTION Ea o '- '� R 0 0 4' Min Residential Street I' City R/W Remove Back of Curb on State or Vertical Curbs with a vertical Saw cut !! 2 o° 5' Min Arterial Street 2' County R/ or Remove entire Curb and Replace as Part of Sidewalk Ramp. M iv F- Modified and Valley Gutter Curbs 1/4" per Foot Join exist back of curb 12" Textured Surface I» 0 Max Slope Back of Curb 3000 psi conc 4" thick. Constr. 6" • `r thick at driveways with 6x6 £10 ' Remove to an welded wire mesh. See note 7. . �I /2' Expansion Joint even Joint or sawcut SECTION A —A NOTES= I. Provide tooled joints at distances matching the width. Also place expansion joints at driveways. 2. If some physical obstruction exists which prevents the placing of sidewalks as shown, contact the Engineering Division for alternate location. 3 Wooden and other spacers will not be permitted In sidewalks or driveways. 4. No coatings of any kind will be permitted an concrete sidewalks or driveways without specific approval of the City Engineer. & All concrete shall be 3000 psi min. 0 28 days, with fiber mesh reinforcing. 6. Concrete surface to be light broom finish. T. Concrete driveway construction shall be 6" thick w 6x6 /10x10 welded wire mesh reinforcement. SECTION B —B & Ramps shall have o tactile surface, textured to a depth not exceeding 1/8" by use of tamp or roner In conformance with requirements of FOOT Roadway and Traffic Design Standards, Dotal 304 or most recent modifications. 4' Tiq. S' RI ZIP Ctt'�`•�.�gGiG G,Q - ' 6 ._ m c °.r � 'Qi soyj, .ocZ. �� •.� 9 If x "" Is less than 48" then the slope of the flared side shall not exceed 12:1. ISOMETRIC VIEW CURB DROP CURB TRANSITION f CURB I TRANSITION I BACK OF SIDEWALK FLOW LINE ELEVATION A -A NOTES* mps are designed to the Uniform Federal Accessibility Standards to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act. 2. Ramps Shall Have a Tactile Surface, Textured to a Depth Not Exceeding 1/8" by use of Tamp or roller In Conformance with Requirements of FDOT Roadway and Traffic Design Standards, Detall 304 Or Most Recent Modifications. Match Existing If CONC. SIDEWALK Gross Planting or Other Existing Sidewalk Non - Walking Surface Grass Planting or Other Non - Walking Surface 4'/5' RAMP CURB 6t.- 6" 6" Vertical Curb in Transition 2' R ,I K Exist. Type 1 Curb Remove Back of Curb Flow Line if Existing RETURNED CURB RAMPS VALLEY GUTTER CURB CONC. RAMP Textured Surface 1. A. 4 4' 12:1 MAX. SECTION B —B r-fth E. Storm Access JAS; Ring & Cove See Index 1203 1. Non traffic bearing. AddlUonal /4 2 11hen pipe diameter exceeds 30', inlets shall not Rebar As Shown be used as Junction boxes, limit 3 pipes per inlet (Typ•) /4 Reber 6" O.C. Each Wa (TYp•) 3'-0' Trans. (TYp•) 3. Chamfer all exposed edges ba 4. NI concrete shall be 3,000 pal, with fiber mesh reinforcing. S. Center support shall be used on double wing inlets (See Octal 8} j4 Rebar >4 Wire To Reber Type t Curb Retaining9 Nut— 44 x 4" x 3/8' Galvanized With Mfashur QSteel Mgls Iran 4 8' Long x 1/2' 0 Chamfer Concrete Galvanized Steel, Carrl a Bolt 2 O.C. 6' Long x 1/2" • yp. Galvanized Steel 4'x 4' x 3/8' Galvanized r r Carriage Bolt, 2' O.C. Steel Angle Iron DETAIL A (TYp•) Q 11. . u ..1.0 4'x e x 3/8' Galvanized Steel Angle Iron 4 8" Long x 1/2" / 4'x 4' x 3/8' Galvanized Galvanized Steel Steel Angle Iron Throat Elev. Coniage Bolt, 2' D.C. Chamfer Cone Dowel 4 (Typ') l0. — FACE OF LID rick " r Throat Elev. 3 1/2" W` 4• Below Gutter Elev. (2)8'x18" Underdrain Q `:'•. • ... •.'`'. club All inlets 5/20/04 Changed Bolt Lengih R.J.M. . "�••' Q ® 11/01/02 Rev. Underdroln Note Novo ar CemMt Grout 2 4/9/02 R. Noles R.G. RfdR TO 12' O.C. MACHINED SURFACES e n 22Jr_� 0 RING SECTION 4" NOTES: 1 - USF 1110 MG COVER 2 - MATERIAL; ASTM -A48 CLASS 30B GRAY IRON. 3 - COVER WEIGHT: 105 LBS. 4 - TOTAL WEIGHT: 195 LBS. DETAIL "B" (2) NON- PENETRATING PICK HOLES —, Building Block Laid 6" From Throat Web Horizontal. Roll of 12 1/2' Guage Fence, 2 "x2" Mesh, 8" Diameter Filled With 3' Spacer Block NOTES: 1. Fiberous filler material in front of block prevents gravel from washing into structure, 2. 2 "x4" Behind block and across throat helps keep block in place. Place in outer hole of spacer block. 3. Bales of hay and sod, similarly placed, may also be used. Gravel Filler 2 "x3" Perferred Sill—_ NOTE! Slit fence Is preferred, if significant grade exists, straw bales may be required to be placed on the downstream side of the silt fence. ADJACENT HOME LAKE Preassembled SIR Fence PROPOSED FOOTPRINT OF HOME ADJACENT HOME L _ PROPERTY LINE Evenly •woad etrow from tpr*xlb,,r 4-S idth bola _ full width of R/W i (usually 15 feet) CURB & GMER CITY STREET 1 Fiberlous Filler Material /- Building Block or Drilled 2 "x6" /- 2 "x4" Timber Spacer Block 2'x2" Stakes 2' in the ground Win Tie Bales butted tightly together • u' l Z U) o E Z u U) 0 W Men O N MEN W W � � o m C C MIN V S 000 M .ell .• LLi a'� t 000 v 3. Chamfer all exposed edges ba 4. NI concrete shall be 3,000 pal, with fiber mesh reinforcing. S. Center support shall be used on double wing inlets (See Octal 8} j4 Rebar >4 Wire To Reber Type t Curb Retaining9 Nut— 44 x 4" x 3/8' Galvanized With Mfashur QSteel Mgls Iran 4 8' Long x 1/2' 0 Chamfer Concrete Galvanized Steel, Carrl a Bolt 2 O.C. 6' Long x 1/2" • yp. Galvanized Steel 4'x 4' x 3/8' Galvanized r r Carriage Bolt, 2' O.C. Steel Angle Iron DETAIL A (TYp•) Q 11. . u ..1.0 4'x e x 3/8' Galvanized Steel Angle Iron 4 8" Long x 1/2" / 4'x 4' x 3/8' Galvanized Galvanized Steel Steel Angle Iron Throat Elev. Coniage Bolt, 2' D.C. Chamfer Cone Dowel 4 (Typ') l0. — FACE OF LID rick " r Throat Elev. 3 1/2" W` 4• Below Gutter Elev. (2)8'x18" Underdrain Q `:'•. • ... •.'`'. club All inlets 5/20/04 Changed Bolt Lengih R.J.M. . "�••' Q ® 11/01/02 Rev. Underdroln Note Novo ar CemMt Grout 2 4/9/02 R. Noles R.G. RfdR TO 12' O.C. MACHINED SURFACES e n 22Jr_� 0 RING SECTION 4" NOTES: 1 - USF 1110 MG COVER 2 - MATERIAL; ASTM -A48 CLASS 30B GRAY IRON. 3 - COVER WEIGHT: 105 LBS. 4 - TOTAL WEIGHT: 195 LBS. DETAIL "B" (2) NON- PENETRATING PICK HOLES —, Building Block Laid 6" From Throat Web Horizontal. Roll of 12 1/2' Guage Fence, 2 "x2" Mesh, 8" Diameter Filled With 3' Spacer Block NOTES: 1. Fiberous filler material in front of block prevents gravel from washing into structure, 2. 2 "x4" Behind block and across throat helps keep block in place. Place in outer hole of spacer block. 3. Bales of hay and sod, similarly placed, may also be used. Gravel Filler 2 "x3" Perferred Sill—_ NOTE! Slit fence Is preferred, if significant grade exists, straw bales may be required to be placed on the downstream side of the silt fence. ADJACENT HOME LAKE Preassembled SIR Fence PROPOSED FOOTPRINT OF HOME ADJACENT HOME L _ PROPERTY LINE Evenly •woad etrow from tpr*xlb,,r 4-S idth bola _ full width of R/W i (usually 15 feet) CURB & GMER CITY STREET 1 Fiberlous Filler Material /- Building Block or Drilled 2 "x6" /- 2 "x4" Timber Spacer Block 2'x2" Stakes 2' in the ground Win Tie Bales butted tightly together • u' l Z U) o E Z u U) 0 W Men O N MEN W W � � o m O 16 W W C C V S 000 M .ell .• LLi a'� t 000 v WCID Z � M .N Z !!�n o 1 OLa �+- V Z C3 F Q 3 a W Z o Y 4X J ~ U) ~ L6 111111 > O OCLa of Cd v • WZ N LL1 u- oUA o rn t` W Z � Y ' mmm W 3 Y !h 0 M o U y W Q OQ Q N 0 oo0 O R W IL 0. IX Z Q 3 1=0 W w W N U O 16 W W C C V 21 000 M .ell .• LLi a'� t 000 W � M .N Z N •= ca 58M OLa �+- 000 LL N �^ Y in Z U) Q) O OCLa of rn • WZ N LL1 O 16 W W C H 21 000 .ell .• LLi a'� t 000 W .N N W 000 D Vi U) of WZ LL1 d o. � Y ' mmm W 3 Y 0 o U C H .ell W � O W MEN N N W D U) of WZ ZQ3 � W v 3 W IL Z Q 1=0 W w W � W0 ZZ3 Ny >o�a L C1 -AIII IL J V � � O W 7 illr s. L C Z W � O W N EXIST. FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY LOCATION ., P-INELAND DRIVE CONNECT TO EX. 6" WATER TRE(TYP) CANOPY , EX 6" PVC WM MAIN W/ 45' - 6' X 4" Ex. 6" PVC WM / - - - - - - _ 40 20 0 40 �- wM - wM - wM - wM - wM - wM w�-- -- -j ^M -'vim- w� wM _ wM REDUCING ELBOW EX. ASPH. PAYT.) - _. -/ --� / W SJ KiN E� COI N TS = EOP ( - . -. -- .. - - - - - - ES -0 - SCALE IN FEET - 24'/40'R 0 0 24'/31'R I IV J I H�L 1 g$,O L, F, PROP. 10' 1 11'/25'R O 6'/7/ \ I 8" PVC ( CH. $0) DRAINAGE & 21•/30'R 1] / 12R O6•s• /8'R\ / / \ - UTILITY ESM'T. > r /1o'R LEGEND / uc n CASING 0 POND Ex. 2" MAIN UG (E�S -U5 / 9•/12'R ■ ot1• /oRl o 15•/24'R 0 UG UG U d \r�l 8'/20R - \ o 90•- - o \/12,� / / PROPOSED SANITARY \ ° l - 1 / N r.�f ,9•/40'R 11 2'� ���' / / / / PROPOSED WATER MAIN \ 12'/16.5'R 0 / ) 6 ES -0 r i(� Q f i v 4'/5'R a: Z ti% / / / / - ,3• /1a.5R ; WATER MAI y o Q PROPOSED FORCE MAIN / INSTALL 4 GAT 'R a w - 1 18'/24'R 0 0 10•/,8'R CONST. 6" PVC SAN. / 6 /14'R / 0 11 'R I 1 _ b - - - - - - - 04•/ • 24'/3 s'R PROPOSED DRAINAGE ■ / SEW. SER (SDR -35) °' / \ ��,�� STRUCTURES Z 36 /27'R / / / / WETLAND JURISDICTIONAL \ ♦ W /CLEANO T PER CITY I 10 p �W,��, 1 14 / 13 12 11 / / / / / LINE & EX. TOP OF BANK _ 6' / „'R INDEX. 0 .304 I I ® ® ® ' 3 " �r\ ® ® ` / / / / / SPRING BRANCH CREEK FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY �I /zo.s'R■ (TYPICAL) ® EX. SA SEWER w I ® ® / / NST. 4 iVC\ / I ( 717 ( 900 DR -18) & MANH ES TO ` - - ' / \ BE REM VED ` a EX. SAW.-SEVER / WATERMAIN / ° I 1 z TO E REMOVED / X \ / \ ,RE«, I 6• /13'R 1 \ 12' /IVR I - ® / e /2�Tr / �EMPORARY ♦,s /21'R I>w.1 / / / / EXIST. CONC. t - 51 50 /49 s 12 EXRT.1-GA , I AALE, & oa ` 1 I l , RETAINING WALL GENERAL NOTES / - _ �_ - \ TEL�PHON SERIYCES BLOWN -OFF ASS E . 10' UTILITY ESM'T. (O.R. 541 PG. ) - .R lo� /18 R0 IT0 BEi3ZWOVED EX. 6" �.V. �a & S/AMPLING P INT \ / / / / / / 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY THE EXISTING FACILITIES PRIOR Y 0 HERS) I / / / / / TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. SS-14 �. - ; / I „• /17•R X.-B-\ / LOT 11 TO / / / / / 2. ALL UTILITY MATERIAL AND WORKMANSHIP MUST COMPLY WITH THE PROP. 15' SEW -E -11 ' / \ 6'/17'R 1� 8 H -18 \ I O - - wM / UTILIZE EXIST. 6" / / % - - - ® - - I / / / / CENTERLINE OF "SECTION IV TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS DATED OCTOBER 13, 200 - - - O SEWER LATERA © \ NS\ �i EX. 2 GUT�R UR �'� TRANS. ® I / / / / SPRINGTIME BRANCH CITY OF CLEARWATER CONTRACT DOCEMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS'. s• /1s'R0� ® �X. PH�AVT. S -05 I / / / / 3. ALL SANITARY SEWER TO BE 8" PVC SOR -35 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 1 I zao3'R PROP. IgRAIN R I ONST. 72.0 L.F. S - S { - 4 LB Ss-04 9 / / ( ). 0 2a' /35'R I I & UTILITY ES -08 ■• EASEMENT PVC (SDR -35) i /� _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - \ s CO 6 PVC SAN. 4. ALL WATER TO BE PVC (C -900), UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 1 10 /21.sR / 1 / » +� 00.33% ® / j �, \ \ EW. SER. (SDR -35)p I 1 5. ALL BACK FILL OVER ANY PIPE INSTALLED UNDER ROADWAYS OR WITHIN EXIST. 12 / � _1 -,: .�.•: \ ••.c EXIST. SANITARY SEWER STRUCTURE TABLE / FORCEMAIN - r \ W /CLEANOUT PER CITY I / / L' THE EMBANKMENT OF THE ROADWAYS SHALL BE COMPACTED PER FOOT \\ I jig /14.5.R XIST. ANSKORMER \ \ " .,: INDEX. NO .304 I I SPECIFICATIONS, SECTION 125 -8.3 (1003 MAXIMUM DENSITY AS SAN. SEW. MH SS -El SAN. SEW. MH SS -03 SAN. SEW. MHOS -07 W.SEW. MH SS-11\ / (TYP.) 12/20.5' f �/ / <` TO BE EL/6CATED 1 I / 1a20'R LOT 41 TO \ \ TYPICAL / /�° , DETERMINED BY AASHTO T -99). N. RIM ELEV.= 17.13 N. RIM ELEV.= 18.50 N. RIM ELEV.= 17.63 - N. RIM ELEV.= 18.56 / >r (TYPICAL) x N. INV. EL = 7.87 8' PVC) N. INV. EL= 9.76 (6' PVC) E. INV. EL= 12.79 (8' PVC) S. INV. EL= 11.21 8' PVC) - EXIST. 2 GAS ,9•/23'R / / (BY ERS 1 UTILIZE EXIST/ 6 \ ® / A:i / 6. THE LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES ARE APPROXIMATE AS SHOWN W. INV. EL = 7.96 (8' PVC) N.E. INV. EL= 9.70 (8" PVC) N.W. INV. EL= 12.76 (8" PVC) E. INV. EL= 11.19 �8" PVC) MAIN TYP. I� ( ° / / COAST. 65.0 .TMe � I I SEWER LAT RAL \ ' \ I / / / AND IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE THE S. INV. EL= 9.90 (6 PVC) TO BE REMOVED ( ) / •�R - / / \ ,t ` - f / / / EXACT LOCATION OF THE UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION IN THEIR SAN. SEW. MH SS E2 ^� 8 PVC SDR TOT LQT I I 11\ I /� VICINITY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ALL CONCERNED PUBLIC S.W. INV. EL.= 9.72 (B" PVC) SAN. SEW. MH SS -OS � I I N. RIM ELEV.= 18.22 N. RIM ELEV.= 17.90 SAN. SEW. MH SS -12 SS -07 ® 0,33% 18'/26'R \ ® / / �~ / / AGENCIES AND UTILITY COMPANIES IN THE AREA BEFORE BEGINNING S. INV. EL = 15.06 (8" PVC) SAN. SEW. MH SS -04 N. INV. EL= 13.07 (6" PVC) N. RIM ELEV.= 19.71 ,o• ,9'R / \ ® \ �� / i / i CONSTRUCTION INCLUDING SUNSHINE STATE ONE CALL AT 1- 800 - 432 -4770 W. INV. R. = 15.02 (8' PVC) N. RIM ELEV.= 17.98 E. INV. EL= 12.98 (8' PVC) N. INV. EL.= 11.49 (8' PVC) �`+ :4 / ` - 41 I I SAN. SEW. MH SS -01 N.E. INV. EL= 10.30 (8' PVC) S. INV. EL= 12.99 (6" PVC) S. INV. EL= 11.51 (8" PVC) I ( 5 11'/16.5'R �� LOT 20 TO I I I \ » I \ 7. PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EXPOSE ALL S.W. INV. EL= 1 10.43 8 PVC) W. INV. EL.= 12.98 (8' PVC) TO BE REMOVED �� I I I I ® ® I A \ % I �� � � \ EXISTING UTILITIES TO BE EXTENDED OR CROSSED AND CONTACT THE N. RIM ELEV.= 17.45 � • 1 W. INV. EL.= 10.41 (6 PVC) E. INV. EL= 839 (6" PVC) 1 UTILIZE ,E IST. 6 �� / / ENGINEER AT 727 - 797 -8982 FOR VERIFICATION OF THEIR LOCATION AND S.W. INV. EL= 8.42 (8" PVC) SAN. SEW. MH. SS -05 SAN. SEW. MH SS -09 SAN. SEW. MH SS -13 N.W. INV. EL.= 8.49 (6" PVC) N. RIM ELEV. 17.51 N. RIM ELEV.= 18.96 N. RIM ELEV.= 19.11 o ®SEWER LATERAL I I 1 > 40 TO „ Y II �3 © ELEVATION. ANY CONFLICTS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ENGINEER'S INV. EL.= 10.61 (8" PVC) N. INV. EL= 13.94 (6' PVC) N. INV. EL.= 11.64 (8" PVC 20 1 I 1 SS -08 / �2 UTILIZE EXIST. 6 I T 7 TO / / / 1 ATTENTION FOR RESOLUTION. SAN. SEW MH SS -02 N.E. N. INV. EL= 10.71 (6" PVC) E INV. EL= 13.73 (8' PVC S. INV. EL= 11.69 (8' PVC; 1 20'/27'R 1 SEWER LATERAL I ° II\ \ _ `U ILIZE EXIST. N. RIM ELEV. 18.08 S. INV. EL= 10.62 (8 PVC) S. INV. EL.= 13.78 (8' PVC; �., p / 1 --- ? I I 15 'R N. INV. EL.= 9.16 (6" PVC) W. INV. EL= 13.68 (8" PVC) SAN. SEW. MH SS -14 F ' 1 I I \ 013'/18'R 40 / I SEWER LATER�L 3'i N.E. INV. EL= 9.00 8' PVC) SAN• SEW MH SS-06 N. RIM ELEV.= 18.75 1 � / h z SAN. SEW. MH $S -1U N. INV. EL.= 12.63 (8' PVC � / � \ S. INV. EL= 9.12 (6 PVC) N. RIM ELEV.= 17.01 N. RIM ELEV= 19.03 S. INV. EL.= 12.64 8 PVC c i S.W. INV. EL= 9.02 (8" PVC) N. INV. EL= 11.06 (8' PVC) N. INV. EL.= 14.03 6' PVC (" 3 1 I I o LOT 2 TO / 1 \ EX. F.H. / \ „•/19'R ASSEMBLY S.E. INV. EL= 12.45 (8" PVC) ( ) o l � � I ;� 1 J,tJTILIZE 'EXIST. 6" 1 EXIST. GAS, CA LE, 1� \ /M•�. W. INV. EL= 11.09 (8- PVC) W. INV. EL= 1402 (8' PVC) / _ \ /� U SEWER LATERAL TELEPH ES ° 25•/32'R CONNECT 8 SAN. 21® 1 �/ �E REMOV D 1 10'/15.5 R SEW. @ I.E. 11.09 / 1 0 1 I ❑ 1 /P WEST INV. TO BE / I , 12 "/2200.5'R ' ( R OTHERS) 2e /4a'R/ 15'/24'R \ \ I 1 } 1 0 f \ / / ® 6 0 I / 13'/20'R p PLUGGED \ i / \ / SANITARY SEWER STRUCTURE TABLE o 0 0 N Q I 3 a 0 W I W W W 0 0 .o U y a 3 0 0 v H -1 H-15 CONST. SANITARY MANHOLE OVER EXIST. 8" SAN. SEWER I W /INSIDE DROP CONNECTION H-18 RIM EL. = 17.53 f� INV. EL. = 13.20 (S) fa V INV. EL. = 8.551(W) EXISTING 19 H -16 CONST. SANITARY MANHOLE RIM EL. = 19.00 W� INV. EL. = 14.76 o 0 0 N Q I 3 a 0 W I W W W 0 0 .o U y a 3 0 0 v H -1 CONST. SANITARY MANHOLE RIM EL. = 17.20 I INV. EL. = 11.30 H-18 CONST. SANITARY MANHOLE f� OVER EXIST. 8" SAN. SEWER fa V RIM EL. = 19.01 19 INV. EL. = 11.541 WATER SERVICE NOTE: 1. CITY WILL PROVIDE TAP AND WATER SERVICE TO EACH LOT. OWNER TO PAY COST AND IMPACT FEES. 1.0 �FSET 2' /3'R p� ° P /SINGLE TER Ell SM �1 • \I _ OM EA MENT o6� /37R ,s• /30 I I I 1 1 SERVICE RER C)TY OF 1 OP �o' \ \ (T ) \ 0 22 � I � / \� �.'. • \ \ � LINE T P. _ I CLWTR. �TAWUARI) NO. 40114f ,6 3r /� / \ \ \ / I 11 "/20.5'R REE CANOPY Q / ta' 21'R 8 , - }� 1 1 : 1 I ■ I (- i \ I i / (TYP.) 36'/37.5'R \ / '' \ 0 4 131 R I 0 \ / 'EXI . WATER INSTALL WATER SERVICE ° TRE4E PRESERVATION ESM'T. \ - ��TT / PER CITY 0� CLTWR2s• /38R 1 1 : I _ / \ / \ \ ,� 5 M�TEO / STANDARD N0. 401 ® 0 Wl I I o I © BE REMOVED WETLAND JURISDICTIONAL \ 28 38R I I EXIST\ GAS•/9ETEOS \ / \\ \ \ \\ ` �./ �\ LINE & EX. TOP OF BANK / a I V & SE VICE LINES ' :: \ 'R SPRING BRANCH CREEK I �o I \ 35.5'R 28'/30 R I v \ 23I © I W I I 12'/21'0 BMIIVED 5 3% p® \\ \\ \ \\ LOT TO o 4� :.. ri bra \ LOT 36/TO \':. \\ \\ `. o \ �\ \\ '` UTILIZE XIST. 6'® 11•/,8'R 1 - 1 �:, UTILIZE EXIST. 6" ° I � p o ° •• \ � \ SEWED LATERAL _ _ _ _ ® SEWER L�TERAL 14•/2 i I \\ 14'/20.5'R J 012•/1 SS -02 \ \\ " 1 � Ex. nl. ESI�iT. "2' (O .R. 5404, PG. 1946) � 1 I � ° � 46 I � \ 6 3 ONST. 6 PVC SAN. _ m ' R TREE CAN ® I \ \\ / LOT 24 TO I I I ss -os / PROP. o \� \ I DRAINAG R \ \ \\ W. SER. (SDR -35) \/ l< UTILIZE EXIST. 6" NS' I ' 1 ESM'T. / EXIST. 0 MER 12.0" \ #\\ \ W /CLEANOUT PER CITY / ,r 0� 28 EXIST. UTILITY ESM T. Is LA RAL \ I o, INDEX. NO .304 0 0 / .�' TO BE VACATED \ / 1 / / RELO A ED \ \�•/33'R / 1 , BY QUIET TITLE I ,0 4R 47 I TO ° I • o / (BY OTHER }� „•� TRANS. y`. \ ` ,(TYPICAL)R' \ .fir I I u Q 1 1 LO'I 11/18'R 1 /18'R 1 I 15' 35 15.�OR O \ \ g ® T CT UTILISE EXIST. 6 4'7 \ CONST .0 L F. \ 11'/16.YR I- 2 EX. WATER I I » :I SEWER LATERAL / C SDR -35 Ir< I \ METERS TO BE I - o / - - H -1 9 ,5'R H -16 _ -- DRAINAGE -Bi - R 1 (� / 1 o REMOVED (TYP.) �., e 2 I I E5 -10 10 \ I EXIST. 2" GAS, \ 1 MAIN (TYP.) \ I �;• 1 - 4" PLUG - - \ .� �\ 11 I LOT' 2 TO / - I� I � � �. () ( \ I UTILIZE EXIST./ 6 ® I � i :. I ® ® t� 4" PVC WM 1) - �" PLUG .� I \ I 26 +�4 Y411 wM wM wM -®wM� 9•/18'R0 / SEJ(VER LAT�15'/20.5'R A EXIST. STORMw.4 %Ek SS -10 ® w ® ® / ® 1 / ® o D TENTION P Nr () - EXIST. 4" WAFER tN / 1) - /4r" X 4" TEE � o „ /, R o / i ES-1 EXIST. 12" / I 1 4 X, 4 TEE 0 BE REM V� " ' 19'R I I I �I I . . I (1) 4 G.V. 17 /2'Ro Q1�- V.- 1 FORCEMAIN 1 EX. GA SERVICE i 9• /1z'R ( LOT 28 TO TILIZE ONSTP 4 PVC / T P�RARY (/� (TYP.) � � 1 •• LINE TO BE ® � '•• ��._/ f z ® ®1 1 I EXIST. 6" EWER C -900, DR -18 RE OVED /BLOW OFF ASSEM. I I I 13 -I ES -11 �� OL 1 2% I I I LATERAL WATER MAIN & SAMPLING POINT I k. I I I / I 1 � W 29 31 , 31 _2 331-1 I ® OP. 10 U LITY ES '� I „• /19.R EX. F. d. \ 1 LIFT 1 \ SS -E2 15'R 1 - S k 1�2'/205'R I !� 13•/17'R - STATION EX. 1010 D AIN GE do UTIU ESM'T. 6531, PG. 350 ,3• /i �- -° z' /2o'R 12-- z /18'R 1.11 FM / t ©I ° G All _r - -� -- - -- Uc - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ES= L ES -18 FM FM FM FM F FM FM -- =uc - - -- Wuc -- - -- uc XL� --," =- ------ -�-� -- - -- _ - - - - -- - _--- - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -------- EX.2'VALLEYGUTTERCURB ------------ - -�-74 ES -13 ` I EX. 26 ASPH. PAV'T. �-- INSTALL WATER SERVICE PER CITY OF CLTWR. ss t STANDARD NO. 401 N. BETTY LANE 1 WARNING ABOVE GROUND OR UNDERGROUND UTILITIES MAY BE IN THE AREA OF THIS PROJECT - PROCEED WITH CAUTION. CONTRACTOR IS TO CALL THE SUNSHINE STATE ONE CALL AT (1- 800 - 432 -4770) AND LOCAL POWER COMPANY 48 HOURS BEFORE BEGINNING WORK. CONTRACTOR TO PROTECT ALL EXISTING UTILITIES IN THE AREAS OF CONSTRUCTION. z H o Z O H W a 0: ° m u 0 06 w Ld Ld 4 0 0 0 1- 0 0 O O O LLJ ;`rilf Q O ui ai LL U � Uj O Y } mmm 0 0 U V W i 0 W W0 U) U) > z Q W m W N U) n W r W x N Z do I f� fa V W 19 ■ W� V1 V Z .� �_ rod• -° M, W Z o 4. o Q '•'•' 1: Cl O 0 '- Z • Z Z 3 a oo°.a W � � N ` 1U6 o x 'a 0 n W Z ui r- m co o W 0 Q _. 0 N w e w3 v 04 u 0 06 w Ld Ld 4 0 0 0 1- 0 0 O O O LLJ ;`rilf Q O ui ai LL U � Uj O Y } mmm 0 0 U V W i 0 W W0 U) U) > z Q W m W N U) n W r W x N Z I fa V 19 CJ V1 O'^ Ln Z m t\ .� �_ rod• -° M, W 0 - 4. o Q '•'•' 1: N 0 '- Z • ^ j0 • oo°.a M LA � N u 0 06 w Ld Ld 4 0 0 0 1- 0 0 O O O LLJ ;`rilf Q O ui ai LL U � Uj O Y } mmm 0 0 U V W i 0 W W0 U) U) > z Q W m W N U) n W r W x N Z I 19 W W U W: ` o o 0 Z 00 0 0 N O O n RING — SEC11ON Minimum Weight 7" 232 lbs. 9" 278 lbs. NOTES 1. Where roadway base is 8" or thicker use 9" ring, all other cases 7" ring is permissible. 2. Manufacturers model of storm ring and cover to be approved by City Engineer. '4 Required Required Pick Hole 1 -1/4" I:rAPR Wq� v ❑ ❑ ❑ 7V S A N IT A RY ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ [ L_jm_S E W E R ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ °F L P° Non Skid Pattern Required \N 22 -3/4" --{ T Machined Surface Minimum Weight 128 lbs. See Index No. 301 1 Varies _ Q _ m L U �- o Joint In 8 " )e Entry 12" — 3ical tom Clay Brick Masonry 1/2" Cement Plaster r R: 12-- ---- NEW, 05 1 0. NOTES: 1. All concrete to be 3000 p.s.l. with fiber mesh reinforcing. 2. P.V.C. pipe entry requires manhole adapter coupling by Flo Control Inc., or approved water stop coupling. 3. Manholes shall have a water proof Bituminous Coating on the exterior do interior. Koppers bltumastic black solution 300M, or Proco EP -214. of outfall pipe for outfall pipes of 10" or larger. See Index No. 301 3' f Q Polyethylene Adjustment Ring Approved barrel joint seals are "0— Rings" and "Ram— Necks ". Concentric cone (Flat cover � � on shallow manholes 0' to Two continuous rings at all joints. 4' depth) P ) ISteel reinforcement 5" min. wall thickness I4' Min. type II acid resistant cement 4000 p.s.i. 2 ,./ ft min. Grout fill opening with non — shrink mortar 0 Poured Concrete Saddle ° NOTES Grout flow channel 1. Precast manhole drop may be approved by City Engineer. Shop drawing submittal required. 2. Drop required when 2' or over. 3. Manholes shall have an exterior coating of at least 15 mils dry thickness PROCO EP214 -351 Epoxi— Mastic or Koppers bltumastic black solution 300M. Interior shall be AGRU SUREGRIP ®HDPE or 0 PP —R Liner with a minimum thickness of 2 mm. l L RE 2' joint in pipe entry (Typical) P.V.C. pipe requires manhole adapter coupling by Flo Control, Inc., or approved water stop coupling. 1 " x 1/8" Stainless Steel Use 3/8" Red Head Anchor to attach to existing wall STRAP DETAIL NOTES 1. P.V.C. pipe entry requires manhole adapter coupling by Flo Control Inc., or approved water stop coupling. PVC Pipe — Suitable Size to fit Tee. is 9" When roadway base is 8 ". 7" When roadway base is 6" & w cases. NOTES! Lamp holes shall have a waterproof bituminous coating on the exterior, Koppers Bitumostic Black 300M, or Proco EP -214. Plug to be plastic with "0' ring or VC with '0' ring. P.V.C. pipe entry requires transits manhole coupling accessory by Johns Manville or equal approved water stop coupling. CLEANOUT PLUG CHARLOTTE Pipe And Foundry Company Part No. 106 Or Equal Mechanical Joint Tee with Compression "0" Rina with D.I. Pipe If Sewer is PVC, a 7 D.I. to PVC Adapter shall be used. 00- O a 3' -0" Stainless Steel Straps — cee ne +„ai See Index No. 301 Cl a Brick —� Masonary .r 1 1/2" Cement Cement Grout Plaster X as required ,� � " L 8" Stub c" Plug (See Note) ' D # 3 Rods ® 12" 6" Concrete Base 4' -0" See NOTE For Traffic Bearing Cover. Concrete Pad 8" Thick x 1' -6" Sq. TWO —WAY CLEANOUT CHARLOTTE Pipe And Foi Part No. 448 Or Equal IL FEMALE ADAPTER CHARLOTTE Pipe And Foundry Company Part No. 101 Or Equal NOTE: Cleanout Plug Cover To Be U.S. Foundry 7623 Or Equal. Sewer Lateral CLEANOUT DETAIL N.T.S. A CLEANOUT PLUG CHARLOTTE Pipe And Foundry Company Part No. 106 Or Equal See NOTE For Traffic Bearing Cover. Concrete Pad 8" Thick x V -6" So. 0 FEMALE ADAPTER CHARLOTTE Pipe And Foundry Company Part No. 101 Or Equal VV.. VI IIV111 TERMINAL CLEANOUT DETAIL N.T.S. NOTE: Cleanout Plug Cover To Be U.S. Foundry 7623 Or Equal. Finish grade to allow 0.4' min., 1.0' max. fall from' property line .to back of curb. Minimum 36" Behind Back Of Curb Or Edge of Pavement 36" 1 I � Double —Sweep Tee 1.1 V 11 1 SECTION —CITY OWNED AND MAINTAINEI ervice Lateral Plug sidewalk R/W I i 30 " -36" or as Directed by the City Engineer HOMEOWNER OWNED AND MAINTAINED ANY VARIANCE MUST HAVE WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE CITY ENGINEER. I Lot 2� Lot I, Lot — — 14 Wm __Or/w line ---------- i- - - - - -- - -Water Main--- r---- y----- - - - - -- ----------------- - - - - -- ----- ------ Curbi 1 � o� O ' San. ater Service O M.H. (TYP') Sanitary Lateral Curbs i r w 1ineD — — wm NOTE: SANITARY LATERALS TO BE WITHIN 10' OF CENTER OF LOT ON DOWNHILL SIDE OF CENTER OF LOT. PLAN VIEW Rim M.H. C, of Street Sanitary yp. /'Sidewalk 2' joint in pipe entry Side Lot Line Lot (Typ.) Main CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT " Y SANITARY LATERAL o�n B.V.D. 06A9/9 9 arECKM BY LOCATIONS X05 a WE DESCAwnar APP, AM011 O BY 3 OF 3 G.C.H. Z N o E Z u C o H > W A B C D E F G Shallow 0'— 4' 2' -6" fQ tJ 4' Max 3' -6" 24" Max 8" #3 at 12" E.W. Standard 4.1'— 6' 3' -6" v 6' Max 4' 30" Max 8" #5 at 10" E.W. Deep 6.1'— 10' 3' -6" 7' 10' 4' 36" Max 12" #5 at 10" E.W. ,Deep 10.1'— 14' 3' -6" 7' 14' 5' 36" Max 12" #5 at 10" E.W. NOTES: 1. All concrete to be 3000 p.s.l. with fiber mesh reinforcing. 2. P.V.C. pipe entry requires manhole adapter coupling by Flo Control Inc., or approved water stop coupling. 3. Manholes shall have a water proof Bituminous Coating on the exterior do interior. Koppers bltumastic black solution 300M, or Proco EP -214. of outfall pipe for outfall pipes of 10" or larger. See Index No. 301 3' f Q Polyethylene Adjustment Ring Approved barrel joint seals are "0— Rings" and "Ram— Necks ". Concentric cone (Flat cover � � on shallow manholes 0' to Two continuous rings at all joints. 4' depth) P ) ISteel reinforcement 5" min. wall thickness I4' Min. type II acid resistant cement 4000 p.s.i. 2 ,./ ft min. Grout fill opening with non — shrink mortar 0 Poured Concrete Saddle ° NOTES Grout flow channel 1. Precast manhole drop may be approved by City Engineer. Shop drawing submittal required. 2. Drop required when 2' or over. 3. Manholes shall have an exterior coating of at least 15 mils dry thickness PROCO EP214 -351 Epoxi— Mastic or Koppers bltumastic black solution 300M. Interior shall be AGRU SUREGRIP ®HDPE or 0 PP —R Liner with a minimum thickness of 2 mm. l L RE 2' joint in pipe entry (Typical) P.V.C. pipe requires manhole adapter coupling by Flo Control, Inc., or approved water stop coupling. 1 " x 1/8" Stainless Steel Use 3/8" Red Head Anchor to attach to existing wall STRAP DETAIL NOTES 1. P.V.C. pipe entry requires manhole adapter coupling by Flo Control Inc., or approved water stop coupling. PVC Pipe — Suitable Size to fit Tee. is 9" When roadway base is 8 ". 7" When roadway base is 6" & w cases. NOTES! Lamp holes shall have a waterproof bituminous coating on the exterior, Koppers Bitumostic Black 300M, or Proco EP -214. Plug to be plastic with "0' ring or VC with '0' ring. P.V.C. pipe entry requires transits manhole coupling accessory by Johns Manville or equal approved water stop coupling. CLEANOUT PLUG CHARLOTTE Pipe And Foundry Company Part No. 106 Or Equal Mechanical Joint Tee with Compression "0" Rina with D.I. Pipe If Sewer is PVC, a 7 D.I. to PVC Adapter shall be used. 00- O a 3' -0" Stainless Steel Straps — cee ne +„ai See Index No. 301 Cl a Brick —� Masonary .r 1 1/2" Cement Cement Grout Plaster X as required ,� � " L 8" Stub c" Plug (See Note) ' D # 3 Rods ® 12" 6" Concrete Base 4' -0" See NOTE For Traffic Bearing Cover. Concrete Pad 8" Thick x 1' -6" Sq. TWO —WAY CLEANOUT CHARLOTTE Pipe And Foi Part No. 448 Or Equal IL FEMALE ADAPTER CHARLOTTE Pipe And Foundry Company Part No. 101 Or Equal NOTE: Cleanout Plug Cover To Be U.S. Foundry 7623 Or Equal. Sewer Lateral CLEANOUT DETAIL N.T.S. A CLEANOUT PLUG CHARLOTTE Pipe And Foundry Company Part No. 106 Or Equal See NOTE For Traffic Bearing Cover. Concrete Pad 8" Thick x V -6" So. 0 FEMALE ADAPTER CHARLOTTE Pipe And Foundry Company Part No. 101 Or Equal VV.. VI IIV111 TERMINAL CLEANOUT DETAIL N.T.S. NOTE: Cleanout Plug Cover To Be U.S. Foundry 7623 Or Equal. Finish grade to allow 0.4' min., 1.0' max. fall from' property line .to back of curb. Minimum 36" Behind Back Of Curb Or Edge of Pavement 36" 1 I � Double —Sweep Tee 1.1 V 11 1 SECTION —CITY OWNED AND MAINTAINEI ervice Lateral Plug sidewalk R/W I i 30 " -36" or as Directed by the City Engineer HOMEOWNER OWNED AND MAINTAINED ANY VARIANCE MUST HAVE WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE CITY ENGINEER. I Lot 2� Lot I, Lot — — 14 Wm __Or/w line ---------- i- - - - - -- - -Water Main--- r---- y----- - - - - -- ----------------- - - - - -- ----- ------ Curbi 1 � o� O ' San. ater Service O M.H. (TYP') Sanitary Lateral Curbs i r w 1ineD — — wm NOTE: SANITARY LATERALS TO BE WITHIN 10' OF CENTER OF LOT ON DOWNHILL SIDE OF CENTER OF LOT. PLAN VIEW Rim M.H. C, of Street Sanitary yp. /'Sidewalk 2' joint in pipe entry Side Lot Line Lot (Typ.) Main CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT " Y SANITARY LATERAL o�n B.V.D. 06A9/9 9 arECKM BY LOCATIONS X05 a WE DESCAwnar APP, AM011 O BY 3 OF 3 G.C.H. Z N o E Z u C o H > W O w w Z toC m t*� '' to --Z W fQ tJ W W' 0 19 a N 00 M v W Zm^ 0 •� L d. tV LU O 4— °' CC4 Z ��Mn o °c a tZ N O1� V 3 z�- M m m Z W a Z a � o rn � V■ N o a' vii W Z � LU W in m WJ U. M IwW W V 0 0 Q Z 0 N 0: ii o: Ul N U a O i6 GC w w Z toC O t*� '' to --Z W fQ tJ W W' 0) O O a +O� 00 00 ' > ww ` Q0 v = Zm^ I OWE Ix WLI.� W y •� L d. Co 3 8 rn W O 4— 5 o` ,M OJ 4. O Q' c5 a: vi a tZ N O1� Y r z�- M m m iv O 5 Y iv = rn � N a O i6 GC w w Z W WWWWM V t*� '' to --Z W W� ~F W W' 0) O O a +O� 00 00 ' > ww ` Q0 v Vi> W� >> UAW U) w ww I OWE Ix WLI.� W y Q Q Q J \Yr .1� Q W _ Y OJ N Q c5 a: vi a tZ w a � Y Y r M m m 3 5 Y o 0 U J WZ y J W� ~F W _Q v Vi> W� >> UAW U) U) I OWE Ix WLI.� W y v0 0 F' U) Cd V m CL W O d O V W t. Z m 00 N d- N °o N a Q I 3 N 0 W V 0 0 ,o V 0 v 3 V O v AZI SERVICE CONNECTION DETAIL NOTES: 1. WATER MAINS TO BE ON NORTH or EAST SIDE OF R.O.W., APPROX. 4 FT. BACK OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE AUTHORIZED BY CITY ENGINEER. 2. SERVICE CONNECTIONS TO BE 2 FT. FROM SIDE LOT LINE ON EITHER SIDE OF LOT (SEE SHEET NO. 3). THESE SERVICES TO BE CONSISTENT WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION. DRIVEWAYS SHALL NOT BE BUILT OVER METERS. 3. ALL LINES SHALL BE CHLORINATED AND PRESSURE TESTED (TEST FOR ONE HOUR ® 150 P.S.I.) UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE UTILITIES DEPARTMENT. AFTER SUCCESSFUL COMPLETION OF THE TESTING AND CHLORINATION, THE PRESSURE SHALL REMAIN ON THE SYSTEM AT ALL TIMES. 4. TEN FT. SEPARATION REQUIRED BETWEEN PARALLEL WATER & SANITARY SEWER LINES. ,&5. SADDLE IS REQUIRED FOR ALL SERVICE CONNECTIONS TO MAINS. 6. MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN SERVICE TAPS TO BE NOT LESS THAN 36 ". 0 A Threaded Corporation Stop Curb Stop MUELLER B -25008 f MUELLER H24350 or Ford or approved equal B43- 332 -WQ with Lock Wing and (Tap at 45' Angle) Compression inlet (3/4" or 1" use meter swivel nut, 1 -1/2" or 2" use FIP outlet) or approved equal X Olron service saddle Ford FC 202 series w /stainless steel band and epoxy coated ductile iron body or approved equal. NOTES: A Water Service Tubing Driscopipe 5100 or Endot /Yardley Blue Jet, SDR 9, 3408 Polyethylene Water Main TYPICAL SECTION 1. 2" PVC CONDUIT TO EXTEND 2' BEHIND BACK OF CURB, BOTH SIDES OF ROADWAY (NOT REQUIRED ON SERVICE REPLACEMENT). 2. PVC CONDUIT TO BE MIN. 18" BELOW THE SURFACE MEASURED FROM TOP OF FACE OF CURB. 3. WATER MAINS TO BE MIN. 30" BELOW GRADE and APPROX. 4' BACK OF CURB 4. CURB STOP TO BE LOCATED APPROX. 1 FOOT BACK OF RIGHT -OF -WAY. 5. SERVICE LINE TO BE MIN. 12" and MAX. 18" BELOW GRADE. a a C � � = v = .Y 0 I I 2, (Typ) CI 1, I - —I 1' 3/4 " Polyethylene Water Service Tubing Curb Stop in 2" PVC Conduit (Typ.) (Typ. 5/8" meter) 18 "Min. -- Threaded Corporation Stop (TYP•) 1 12" -18" 30" Min. I Water Main SERVICE LOCATIONS LotI Lot I Lot I I `""' rr w line Water Main ' Cu rb IJ 1 ------------------- OpL ------------- San. - - - -� - -r- ------------ `--- - - - - -- - - - - - - - M. H. Water Service r (TYP,) � I an Lateral (TYPO Curb Sidewalk rw inF_�,� -- wm -- -- -- -- 10' Lot 2' Lot -Side Lot Line (Typ.) NOTE: SANITARY LATERALS TO BE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA WITHIN 10' OF CENTER OF LOT ON PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION DOWNHILL SIDE OF CENTER OF LOT. "MA PBY 01 X'5/92 0IEOM BY SERVICE LOCATIONS 14 401 ND, REV. DATE OESCRPTION APP. DE G.CT BY 3 OF 3 G.C.H. a� c TYPICAL VALVE SETTING n.t.s. Adjustable Valve Box When Valve Occurs in Roadway, is o set Base on 10- Common Brick. -\ I 0 �/ \\ N I a Water Main Mech. Joint Valve \"-Restraining Joint TYPICAL FIRE HYDRANT SETTING n.t.s. Max. 15' - Min. 4' 18" Min. 24" Max. Distance Varies I to c I Back of Curb or Edge of Pavement Valve Box i N /-Mech. Joint Valve NOTES: i 1. Steamer Connection to Face Street. 2. All Fire Hydrants to have 5 1/4" Valve Seat. 3. Fire Hydrants Shall be Placed at Street Corners or in the R.O.W. Adjacent to Side Lot Lines Whenever Possible. 4. See Sheet 3 for Typical Connections & Fittings. ONLY APPROVED ® Kennedy Guardian No. K -81D Muller Centurion No. A -423 U.S. Pipe Metropolitan .,..,pining Joint (Typ.) P.V.C. PIPE RESTRAINT THE FOLLOWING JOINTS MUST BE RESTRAINED IN ALL APPLICATIONS: 1. BEND - INLET AND OUTLET 2. TEE - OUTLET BRANCH 3. OFFSETS - INLET AND OUTLET 4. CAPS 5. PLUGS 6. DEAD ENDS 7. HYDRANT RUNOUTS SHALL BE RESTRAINED AS DEAD ENDS �•� L Megalug Restrainer (Typ.) Ebba 1500 Series (Typ.) ON ALL TEES, A MINIMUM OF 5' SHALL BE RESTRAINED ON EACH RUN LEG L - MINIMUM LENGTH TO BE RESTRAINED ON EACH SIDE OF FITTING (ft.) FIGURES BASED ON 30" DEPTH BURY, 150 PSI TEST PRESSURE. 8" PVC MAXIMUM SIZE USED IN SYSTEM NOM. SIZE ELBOWS (deg.) VALVE TEES BRANCH DEAD END 11.2.50 .J 45 90 4 2 1 4 9 21 28 46 6 3 1 6 12 29 1 1 47 1 65 8 4 1 8 1 16 38 1 66 1 85 NOTE: THRUST RESTRAINT AT FITTINGS AND VALVES SHALL BE BY USE OF EBBA IRON MEGALUG RESTRAINERS. THRUST RESTRAINT BETWEEN PIPE JOINTS SHALL BE BY EBBA IRON SERIES 1500 RESTRAINERS. BLOWOFF DETAIL n.t.s. 4" Minimum, 12" Maximum Meter Box Water Valve Box 4 "x2" Cap with 2" Brass Plug 4" D.I. 4 Resilent Wedge Gate Valve 0 0 Water Main v o 90' Bend MJ X SLIP CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION • ENGINEERING B.V.D. Y 09 D16 99 Qi 4/05. Add Not.. Q ED BY BLOWOFF L.M.M. DETAIL 4D REV. DATE DESCRIPTION App. OE9CNED P. 1 OF 1 T.E.P. STREET WITH CURB I . STREET WITHOUT CURB U a 0 0 M w r Tr 4' Min. 36" min 1-1,1- 4 Min. Steel Cosin Ductile Restraining (Size Varies Iron Pipe Gaskets (typ) NOTES 1. All pipe thru casing to be ductile iron. 2. All pipes within casing to be restrained by restraining gaskets. 3. Casing pipe to meet F.D.O.T. standards. CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING REDRANN BY DATE I 2/95 NOTES do PIPE DESC. GCH CIE ( BY JACK AND BORE r+oE N0. REV. DME DESOWTION App, DESIGNED BY T w T D.'H. Restrained 2'� Tapped Plug END CONNECTION n D 2" Ban Valve - Hose Bibb 3/4" Galvanized 2" Galvanized 2" Corporation Tapping Saddle - Z I TOP CONNECTION Z U) o Z O ° less N Meet W c 19 m Goo W ■ W v Z Z o O " Z � � o L16 i o 'a rn o W Z a m 2 W O V y" Z � ♦O y N W 39 Cr. Lq N U � WZ WD o! U, ..IoW 40 O .J W O V N Z� ;m W U) O ® E to a L16 he 00 5 Z 0o. c _�� N W Z O > Q, N W .L. a. -0 z O off oCL. 0 0 0 n. N a me R W � W FA O v Z 00 W �. 7 O WZ WD o! U, ..IoW 1 1a .J W N Z� ;m W U) Oz a L16 he 00 5 ' m N W Z V W a. 00 V 0 0 0 n. < (t���! d F'— 0 0 o i'�i fiIz Y' � c) a- Ui W � Y a Y mmm Z o Of V) = 0 c U R W � W FA O v Z 00 W �. 7 O WZ WD U, ..IoW 1 1a .J N Z� ;m W U) W aJ19 WtJO a L16 he m N W V 7 d R W � W FA O v Z 00 W �. 7 O N O 0 N Q. Q 1 3 W 1 z Q QL V O Q J V 0 h 0 .o U L C V 3 O V 0 X O H E Z m c'�oo cyr�. fi C W � O ` TREE CANOPY 1M LAND DRIVE 40 20 0 40 W o (TYP.) / � �1 RAW — — _ wm wm wm — . —wm wm wm "mom - �- • ^: --vu�" MM+ ---� - auA�i — — ww — •per —wm wm / (EX. ASPH.•PAV'T.) SC ._ _,' .— - /.. -- A m EOP _.—_� —.• - -• — � � ALE IN FEET — rt /zo.R — 1 = 40� i — — — — — — — 24'/40'8 O O 24'/31'8 — O 24•/28 R — — — 1 11'/25'8 O O 6• /1/12'8 8•/8 04 i %PROPOSED E D VIN�Y�R c v— o \ am / \ BEGIN VINYL FENCE / ° �7'/10'R os /8R W / \ \ � 11•/10 RI 1 11,11,11,1111, pls' /2a'R W LINE OF PINELsI D RI ICE / 9•/12'RO 'P/20'R _ LEGEND W 0 l / / 16 "/31'R Z o — 0 /08 12'/16.5'8 o 4• /s'R „•/128 O EXISTING OAK TREE Z � °o a SIZE AS DENOTED 9 /63 ' /58 /33 /14'8 \ — — — — — — 28'/4,0'8 /42 157 TREE DESIGNATION W o 18/24'80 O 10• /, I / t14 R— 1 _ 4 24./35,8 13•/'a'R -I IN ARBORIST'S REPORT 159 160 I 1 N 36•/27r� ' / \ / WETLAND JURISDICTIONAL EXISTING WATER MAIN V. ' LINE & EX. TOP OF BANK 0 \ — s• /2o.s }( /118 ; / 1 '� 1 6 \ I / / / \ SPRING BRANCH CREEK PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER 11- c —\ 1 PROPOSED STORM SEWER ', c 51/ 50 \ 49 4H — —/ / / �"'� & DRAINAGE STRUCTURES W co 8•� \ 12'/15 / / I 1 3 1s• /21•R I"`t EXIST. CONC. W t� M l RETAINING WALL o /29 • ..� M 2B 10/18' \ 1 3 R / I \ / ' W < < - \ / 14•/19'R us cl / \ \ 17.3'11 R — —_ — -- - - -- 10 N O s'o7R \ 23 ,•• .•` CENTERLINE OF Q 1'a' 1 Q - �� EX. 2 V EEY GUUER UR \ SPRINGTIME BRANCH 0- 0 6' /18'Rpf C7 / EX. SPH. PAVT. I/ O 24'/358 1 I 24.038 I I 5 "/15.5'8 S I I \ \ / �— - - - - -- - - -- -- -�� S \ LtJ 0: 10'/21.5'R / . , . . M < 9'/14.5'R / ; „ 04 0 16•/10 R T12/20 .5 i 9 19•/23' , . / / / . i' : _ f82 LANDSCAPING NOTES '/24'R 1 \ TOT LQT / I — " `� �'�1 _ _ 1 1w 1. EACH LOT WILL BE REQUIRED TO HAVE A MINIMUM OF \ a2g' / _ 41 \ /80 / QQ\ \ '�= TWO (2) 2 -1/2" CALIPER SHADE TREES PER CITY OF I I 42 I ? / I ' /� 40 V CLEARWATER CODE. I I PR POSED 4. I I \ I / \ • H I ` I CON SIDEWAL I 25 0 \ `1W /20 20./27 Ni > I S I \ 13'/18'R I \ 15'/21.0 \ 16 53'R '21 0 I r :—EC5 •i - - -- 20' X 20' SIGHT - VISIBILITY TRIANGLE (TYP.) W'1 N. BETTY LANE 60' R/W VISIBILITY TR1,;, NGLE (TYP.) r -4 o ° \ WETLAND JURISDICTION � tit LINE & EX. TOP OF BAN / a SPRING BRANCH CREED ( "� I30'R \ \ of a ( 1 D I 70 \ 1 / _ V �• \ \ ?w � I= �I � W W '7� p N f1•/18'R O of 5•/9'R / I / O O O (;10-/28' •1338 \ \ \ ,4•/27' � � I �� I \ � / �\-L•q I 10.100 _ I � '1 y '�s• \ EXISiT. STORM A TEk 15' 20.5'8 D TENTION P I q I / i TO REMAIN o \ II q N 12'/20.5'R I / f /113'/17'R \ I I I /2 1 O SIG All EX 5 W — BfXL� 0 0 J d U. 1 f M LM 0 LA Z M n 72 lD M Ln Z 0 v= o a �- M I 4/'f Ilk 0b'0 �- O QD .0 LLI vi U Q. (/') W d � Y Y mmm Z Z C3 0 C3 U v W 7 O 19 L W W N m WZ W O V y N> z Q W m H y U) M r w w w 0 N W rm i Q' Q Y � a-i ZZ OQ F 4C L � d 19 L UA H o 0 Z 00 Ill 2 7 a d_ Lop f.J G� r �cA Lu f / 15•/24'R I O O I 24'/32'R \ 15'/3C / t4A i I 25•lai I r :—EC5 •i - - -- 20' X 20' SIGHT - VISIBILITY TRIANGLE (TYP.) W'1 N. BETTY LANE 60' R/W VISIBILITY TR1,;, NGLE (TYP.) r -4 o ° \ WETLAND JURISDICTION � tit LINE & EX. TOP OF BAN / a SPRING BRANCH CREED ( "� I30'R \ \ of a ( 1 D I 70 \ 1 / _ V �• \ \ ?w � I= �I � W W '7� p N f1•/18'R O of 5•/9'R / I / O O O (;10-/28' •1338 \ \ \ ,4•/27' � � I �� I \ � / �\-L•q I 10.100 _ I � '1 y '�s• \ EXISiT. STORM A TEk 15' 20.5'8 D TENTION P I q I / i TO REMAIN o \ II q N 12'/20.5'R I / f /113'/17'R \ I I I /2 1 O SIG All EX 5 W — BfXL� 0 0 J d U. 1 f M LM 0 LA Z M n 72 lD M Ln Z 0 v= o a �- M I 4/'f Ilk 0b'0 �- O QD .0 LLI vi U Q. (/') W d � Y Y mmm Z Z C3 0 C3 U v W 7 O 19 L W W N m WZ W O V y N> z Q W m H y U) M r w w w 0 N W rm i Q' Q Y � a-i ZZ OQ F 4C L � d 19 L UA H o 0 Z 00 Ill 2 7 a d_ Lop f.J G� r �cA Lu f