09/15/2015 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING MINUTES
CITY OF CLEARWATER
September 15, 2015
Present: Chair Brian A. Barker, Vice Chair David Allbritton, Board Member Richard
Adelson, Board Member Michael Boutzoukas, Board Member Christopher J.
Anuszkiewicz, Board Member Mary A. Lau, Board Member John Funk, Alternate/Acting
Board Member John Quattrocki
Also Present: Jay Daigneault - Attorney for the Board, Camilo Soto - Assistant City
Attorney, Michael L. Delk - Planning & Development Director, Robert Tefft -
Development Review Manager, Patricia O. Sullivan - Board Reporter
A. CALL TO ORDER, INVOCATION, PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Chair called the meeting to order at 1:00 p.m. at City Hall, followed by the
Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance.
B. WELCOME NEW BOARD MEMBER: John Quattrocki
C. ROLL CALL
D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING: August 18, 2015
Member Funk moved to approve the minutes of the August 18, 2015 Community
Development Board meeting as submitted in written summation. The motion was duly
seconded and carried unanimously. Alternate Member Quattrocki did not vote.
E. CITIZENS TO BE HEARD, RE: ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA: None.
F. LEVEL TWO APPLICATIONS: (Items 1- 2)
1. Case. FLD2015-06025 — 706 Bavwav Boulevard Level Two Application
Owner: Bavwav Hotel Holdings LLC
Applicant: Housh Ghovaee (300 S. Belcher Road, Clearwater, FL 33765; phone:
(727) 443-2869; email: housh(o)-northsideengineering.net)
Location: 0.35 acre generally located at the northern terminus of Parkway Drive
with Bavwav Boulevard
Atlas Page: 285A
Zoning: Tourist (T) District
Request: Flexible Development approval to permit a 32-room overnight
accommodation use in the Tourist (T) District with a lot area of 15,264 square
feet, a lot width of 135 feet, a front (south) setback of 35 feet (to building) and
Community Development 9/15/2015 1
eight feet (to pavement/ramp), a side (west) setback of six feet (to building) and
one foot (to pavement), a side (east) setback of 30 feet (to building) and three
feet (to paving) and six feet (to garage ramp) and a rear (north) setback of six
feet (to building) and zero feet (to pavement); and a building height of 75 feet
and 90 feet to highest architectural feature; and a minimum of 38 parking
spaces at 1.2 parking spaces per hotel room, under the provisions of CDC
Section 2-803.x; elimination of the required foundation landscaping and interior
landscape requirement as a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the
provisions of CDC Section 3-1202.G; and to permit an existing 1,783 square
foot, five-slip dock to remain with a length of 55 feet, width of 96 feet, west
setback of 12 feet and an east setback of nine feet under the provisions of CDC
Section 3-601; and a two-year Development Order under the provisions of CDC
Section 4-407.
Proposed Use: Overnight Accommodations
Neighborhood Associations: Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition and
Clearwater Beach Association
Presenter: Mark T. Parry, AICP, Senior Planner
Member Allbritton moved to accept Mark Parry as an expert witness in the fields of
redevelopment planning, comprehensive planning, annexation implementation, zoning,
land use/rezoning applications, land development general planning code amendments,
landscape ordinance, and special area plans/overlay districts. The motion was duly
seconded and carried unanimously. Alternate Member Quattrocki did not vote.
Senior Planner Mark Parry reviewed the Staff Report. One letter of objection was
received. In response to a question, he said the dock's structural deficiencies would be
repaired as part of the development process.
Attorney Katie Cole, representing the applicant, said the project complied with Beach by
Design and the Code. She reviewed prior CDB (Community Development Board)
approvals of development agreements for taller structures on this site. She said the
building was shifted closer to the Police Department, the entrance ramp was moved 30
feet, and the footprint was reduced to meet neighbor concerns re noise and proximity.
She reviewed nearby buildings of similar heights; the CDB recently approved a 100-foot
tall hotel project on S. Gulfview. She said the applicant had applied for permits to modify
and repair the dock.
Member Boutzoukas moved to accept Frank Fraze as an expert witness in the field of
architecture including the interior and exterior layout and design of buildings. The
motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Alternate Member Quattrocki did
not vote.
Community Development 9/15/2015 2
Member Funk moved to accept Mitch Riley as an expert witness in the field of site
development in application of City Codes to Civil Engineering. The motion was duly
seconded and carried unanimously. Alternate Member Quattrocki did not vote.
One person spoke in favor of the project.
Member Funk moved to approve Case FLD2015-06025 based on the evidence and
testimony presented in the application, the Staff Report and at today's hearing, and
hereby adopt the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law stated in the Staff Report
with conditions of approval as listed. The motion was duly seconded and carried
unanimously. Alternate Member Quattrocki did not vote.
2. Case. FLD2015-06023 — 249 Windward Passage Level Two Application
Owner: Clearwater Marine Aquarium
Applicant: Scott McClelland (812 Louden Avenue, Dunedin, FL 34698; phone:
(727) 734-3673; email: smcclel land(o-)-iog-ioc.com)
Location: 4.53 acres located on the south side of Windward Passage
approximately 210 feet west of Island Way
Atlas Page: 267B
Zoning: Commercial (C) District
Request: Flexible Development approval to permit the expansion of the
Clearwater Marine Aquarium within the Commercial (C) District with a lot area of
197,115 square feet (4.53 acres), a lot width of 546.3 feet, front (north) setbacks
of 101 feet (to building) and 14.8 feet (to pavement), rear (south) setbacks of
11.8 feet (to building) and zero feet (to marina promenade), side (east) setbacks
of 23.1 feet (to building) and zero feet (to marina promenade), side (west)
setbacks of 34 feet (to building) and zero feet (to marina promenade), and side
(north) setbacks of 30.5 feet (to building) and zero feet (to pavement), a building
height of 28.5 feet, and 153 off-street parking spaces as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project pursuant to Community Development Code Section 2-
704.F. along with reductions to the perimeter buffer requirements along the
easternmost property line from 10 feet to 3.5 feet, the south property lines from
15 feet to zero feet, and the north (non-Windward Passage) property lines from
10 feet to zero feet, a reduction from the required number of trees within interior
landscape islands from 46 to 14, and a reduction to the width of interior
landscape islands from 17 feet to eight feet as a Comprehensive Landscape
Program pursuant to Community Development Code Section 3-1202.G., with a
two-year Development Order.
Proposed Use: Aquarium
Neighborhood Associations: Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition and Island
Estates Civic Association
Presenter: Matt Jackson, Senior Planner
Member Barker declared a conflict of interest and left Chambers.
Community Development 9/15/2015 3
Member Lau disclosed that she was President of the Island Estates Civic Association.
Member Funk moved to accept Matthew Jackson as an expert witness in the fields of
zoning, site plan analysis, planning in general, and landscape ordinance. The motion
was duly seconded. Members Allbritton, Adelson, Boutzoukas, Anuszkiewicz, Lau, Funk
and Acting Member Quattrocki voted "Aye"; Chair Barker abstained. Motion carried
unanimously.
Senior Planner Matt Jackson reviewed the Staff Report. The grass lots will not be
available for parking after the end of the year; parking demand must be met onsite.
Attorney Brian Aungst, representing the applicant, said the request was an amendment
to the May 2011 approval of a project to construct approximately 11 000 square-feet of
new floor area, a 4-level parking garage, an outdoor tank with viewing area, etc. He said
the floor area and parking garage were not built. He said this request was less
intensive: a permanent 1-story, 150 square-foot ticket booth and a 6,650 square-foot, 2-
story building for a concession stand/gift shop/pelican enclosure that would replace the
temporary ticket booth/kiosk and concession stand/gift shop/pelican enclosure that were
constructed for filming 2 Dolphin Tale movies. He said the aquarium's top priority was to
identify parking solutions. He said the project would not impact traffic. He said the
proposal met or exceeded the City Code and Comprehensive Plan.
Frank Dame, with Clearwater Marine Aquarium, said the project would not increase
attendance. He said no additional movies were planned; attendance decreased by 27%
since last year.
Four people spoke in opposition and one person looked forward to living in harmony
with the facility.
Mr. Jackson reviewed notification requirements and said a building's height was
measured from BFE (Base Flood Elevation). Setbacks and flexibility would not change.
The notice had a scrivener's error; the aquarium was not open overnight.
Attorney Aungst said the aquarium closed at 5:00 p.m. and had no plans to extend its
operational hours. He said Code would allow the structure to be significantly taller than
requested. He said the aquarium had been on this site since 1978 and was committed
to be a good neighbor.
Mr. Dame said he had reviewed the application, explained the changes, and walked the
property with the Board of Directors for 240 Windward Island. He said the aquarium had
made a good effort to communicate with neighbors.
Community Development 9/15/2015 4
It was recommended that temporary lots not be reopened and that the aquarium
establish lines of communication with Island Estates residents.
Member Boutzoukas moved to approve Case FLD2015-06023 based on the evidence
and testimony presented in the application, the Staff Report and at today's hearing, and
hereby adopt the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law stated in the Staff Report
with conditions of approval as listed. The motion was duly seconded. Members
Allbritton, Adelson, Boutzoukas, Anuszkiewicz, Lau, Funk and Acting Member
Quattrocki voted "Aye"; Chair Barker abstained. Motion carried unanimously.
G. APPEALS (Items 1):
1. Case: APP2015-00001 — 1500 S. Belcher Road Owner: McDonalds USA LLC
Applicant: Kim Sever/Pam DeDea, The Sever Group (7321 Merchant Court,
Sarasota, FL 34240; phone: (941) 552-2200; email:
kim(a)-seyergroup.com/pam(a)-seyergroup.com)
Location: 0.833 acre located at the southwest corner of Belcher Road and
Nursery Road
Atlas Page: 316B
Zoning: Commercial (C) District
Request: An appeal, pursuant to Section 4-501.A.4., Community Development
Code, of the denial of an amendment to a Comprehensive Sign Program to
window signage on the north, south and east building facades pursuant to
Section 3-1808, Community Development Code.
Existing Use: Restaurant
Neighborhood Associations: Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition
Presenter: Matthew Jackson, Senior Planner
Member Allbritton moved to accept Matthew Jackson as an expert witness in the fields
of zoning, site plan analysis, planning in general, and landscape ordinance. The motion
was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Alternate Member Quattrocki did not vote.
Senior Planner Matt Jackson reviewed the Staff Report. Every window on the
restaurant's north, south and east facades was completely covered by signage, installed
without approval or consultation with the City. Window signage exceeded the amount
allowed by Code; window signs may not exceed 25% of the total window area and the
cumulative area may not exceed 50 square-feet on any facade.
Following Code Enforcement activity, the McDonald's restaurant submitted an
application on June 10, 2015 to amend FLD2012-01001 and permit the window
coverings to remain. Following review, staff issued a development order on July 31,
2015, denying the application to approve the window coverings: 1) 207.1 square-feet on
the north facade; 2) 61.6 square-feet on the south facade; and 3) 210.1 square-feet on
the east facade. Denial of the amendment request did not preclude Code compliant
Community Development 9/15/2015 5
window signage. Completely covering windows caused problems for emergency
personnel as it their blocked views into the building.
In response to a question, Mr. Jackson said windows were an architectural element of a
building.
It was commented that the signs appeared to be murals, completely covering all of the
windows, making it impossible to see the inside.
Pam DeDea, representing the Seyer Group, said McDonald's had spent a lot of money
in Clearwater. She said the "create your own taste program" required customers to
come inside the store and personalize their burger orders. She said McDonald's could
not market the pilot program and had to depend on advertising at test market sites. She
said the Mayor had participated in the June 9, 2015, ribbon cutting that launched the
program in Clearwater. She said a marketing company had provided the window
coverings. She apologized, stating they did not know the window graphics would be an
issue.
Ms. DeDea said window graphics were the only way for customers to know about the
pilot program. She said the graphics were more attractive than yard signs. She said
before the window coverings were installed, the restaurant was not using all of the
signage it was qualified to have. She said the calculation of the sign's size should be
based on words, not graphic drawings.
Assistant City Attorney Camilo Soto said both image and verbiage were part of a sign.
He said the pilot program did not exempt the restaurant from the Code.
Kim Seyer, of the Seyer Group, said the verbiage was directional, asking people to
come in and learn about the new program; people would not know to come in if they
could not read the signs. She said the amount of verbiage on the windows complied
with Code. She said the request was temporary as the pilot program expired December
317 2015. She said the temporary signage should be allowed as it was attractive, as
required by Code.
Mr. Jackson reviewed Comprehensive Sign Code size limitations for window signs.
Ms. Seyer said there had been no other way to attach temporary signage for the pilot
program without damaging the building; hard signage was not used. She said the
restaurant was a test market participant and tried to be innovative. She said the window
coverings were intended for customers when they drove into the parking lot. She said
the signage did not negatively impact the area. She said there were no safety or
security issues as customers could see out of the building.
Community Development 9/15/2015 6
Discussion ensued with comments that while the applicants wanted to convey the
concept of the pilot program, their interpretation of the sign code was difficult to
understand as both verbiage and pictures of a hamburger on a plate and a person
standing at a kiosk, for example, conveyed a message. It was stated that the window
coverings looked nice but were not allowed by Code.
Attorney for the Board Jay Daigneault said to grant an appeal, overturn or modify the
decision being appealed, the Code required the Board to find that based on substantial
competent evidence presented by the applicant or other party that every criteria is met:
1) appealed decision was misconstrued or incorrectly interpreted Code provisions; and
2) Board decision will be in harmony with general intent and purpose of the Code; and
3) Board decision will not be detrimental to public health, safety and general welfare.
Member Anuszkiewicz moved to deny the appeal, Case APP2015- 00001, and affirm the
Staff's order denying the application based on the evidence and testimony presented in
the application, the Staff Report and at today's hearing, and hereby adopt the Staff's
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law stated in the Staff Report. The motion was
duly seconded and carried unanimously. Alternate Member Quattrocki did not vote.
H. DIRECTOR'S ITEMS (Items 1):
1. Changes to Agenda Appearance.
Planning Manager Robert Tefft said future agenda items will be more succinct.
L ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 2:44 p.m.
Chair
Community Development Board
Community Development 9/15/2015 7
FORM 8B MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT FOR
COUNTY, MUNICIPAL, AND OTHER LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS
LAST NAM RST NAME- MIDDLE NAME
7r/-r Sri rQvn A_
NAME OF B RD, COUNCIL, COMMISSION, AUTHORITY, OR OMMITTEE
community km/. Moir
MAILING ADDRESS
/� •
7 y. V eS p_ J l fre_a_ .
THE BOARD, COUNCIL, COMMI ION, AUTHORITY OR COMMITTEE ON
WHICH I SERVE IS A UNIT OF:
>dTY ❑ COUNTY ❑ OTHER LOCAL AGENCY
CITY COUNTY
Cfe4. rw r piii /tAt s
NAME OF POLITICAL SU/B�D'VISION:
v� eArwA. e.r
DATE ON WHICH VOTE OCCURRED
S
q / //
MY POSITION IS:
/APPOINTIVE
❑ ELECTIVE 1� APPOINTIVE
WHO MUST FILE FORM 8B
This form is for use by any person serving at the county, city, or other local level of government oh an appointed or elected board, council,
commission, authority, or committee. It applies equally to members of advisory and non - advisory bodies who are presented with a voting
conflict of interest under Section 112.3143, Florida Statutes.
Your responsibilities under the law when faced with voting on a measure in which you have a conflict of interest will vary greatly depending
on whether you hold an elective or appointive position. For this reason, please pay close attention to the instructions on this form before
completing the reverse side and filing the form.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 112.3143, FLORIDA STATUTES
A person holding elective or appointive county, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which
inures to his or her special private gain or loss. Each elected or appointed local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting on a mea-
sure which inures to the special gain or loss of a principal (other than a government agency) by whom he or she is retained (including the
parent organization or subsidiary,of\a corporate principal by which he or she, retained); to the special private gain.or loss of a relative; or
to the special private gain or loss of a business associate. Commissioners of community redevelopment agencies under Sec. 163.356 or
163.357, F.S., and officers of independent special ax districts elected on a one -acre, on,e -vote basis are not prohibited from voting in that
capacity.
For purposes of this law, a "relative" includes only the officer's father, mother, son, daughter, husband, wife, brother, sister, father -in -law,
mother -in -law, son-in -law, and'daughter - -in -law. A "business associate" means any person or entity engaged -in or carrying on a business
enterprise with the officer as a partner, joint venturer, coowner of property, or corporate shareholder (where the shares of the corporation
not listed on any national or regional stock exchange).
are n., Gs „ any regional
. .
ELECTED OFFICERS:
In addition to abstaining from voting in the situations described above, you must disclose the conflict:
PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of your interest in the measure on which you
are abstaining from voting; and
WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by completing and filing this form with the person responsible for recording the min-
utes of the meeting, who should incorporate the form in the minutes.
APPOINTED OFFICERS:
Although you must abstain from voting in the situations described above, you otherwise may participate in these matters. However, you
must disclose the nature of the conflict before making any attempt to influence the decision, whether orally or in writing and whether made
by you or at your direction.
IF YOU INTEND TO MAKE ANY ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION PRIOR TO THE MEETING AT WHICH THE VOTE WILL BE
TAKEN:
• You must complete and file this form (before making any attempt to influence the decision) with the person responsible for recording the
minutes of the meeting, who will incorporate the form in the minutes. (Continued on other side)
CE FORM 8B - EFF. 1/2000
PAGE 1
APPOINTED OFFICERS (continued)
• A copy of the form must be provided immediately to the other members of the agency.
• The form must be read publicly atthe next meeting after the form is filed.
IF YOU MAKE NO ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION EXCEPT BY DISCUSSION AT THE MEETING:
You must disclose orally the nature of your conflict in the measure before participating.
You must complete the form and file itwithin 15 days after the vote occurs with the person responsible for,recording the minutes of the
meeting, who must incorporate the form in the minutes. A copy of the form must be provided immediately to the other members of the
agency, and the form must be read publicly at the next meeting after the form is filed.
DISCLOSURE OF LOCAL OFFICER'S INTEREST
I, 'r• j a• ' ar/-r'
, hereby disclose that on
(a) A mfaasure came or will come before my agency which (check one)
inured to my special private gain or loss;
inured to the special gain or loss of my business associate,
inured to the special gain or loss of my relative,
inured to the special gain or loss of , by
whom I am retained; or
inured to the special gain or loss of , which
is the parent organization or subsidiary of a principal which has retained me.
(b) The measure before my agency and the nature of my conflicting interest in the measure is as follows:
n i fl eiy/° y s m -
f
p► not o,f wAif c ,oar + Oti ne-r/ t.✓a -S
ih i/t het poi e cif (,y /friee,p)
e,
C it4trw4A-er \otrl'e- Ara,'1'utti
9 4s
,2016 :
Date Filed
Signature
NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES §112.317, A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRED DISCLOSURE
CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: IMPEACHMENT,
REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION, REDUCTION IN SALARY, REPRIMAND, OR A
CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED $10,000.
CE FORM 8B - EFF. 1/2000
PAGE 2
} earwa er
0
Interdepartmental Correspondence Sheet
TO Community Development Board Members
FROM Robert Tefft, Development Review Manager
COPIES, Camilo Soto, Assistant City Attorney; Susan Chase, Documents and Records Specialist, /Pat
Sullivan, Board Reporter
SUBJECT, Agenda Items for Septemberl5, 2015
DATE: September 08„ 2015
CDB packets being distributed contain the following:
Site investigation form
Unapproved minutes of previous meeting August 18, 2015 will be emailed to you on
Monday, September 14, 2015
LEVEL TWO APPLICATIONS (TEEMS 1 -2)
1. Case: F D2015 -06025 — 706 Bayway Boulevard
Yes No
Presenter: Mark T. Parry, AICP, Senior
2. Case: FLD2015 -06023 — 249 Windward Passage Case: Presenter: Mathew Jackson, Senior
Planner
Yes No
APPEALS (ITEMS 1)
1. Case: APP2015-00001 — 1500 S. Belcher Road Presenter: Mathew Jackson, Senior Planner
Yes No
I have co • . ed a personal investigation on the personal site visit to the following properties
Signs _ _`_ '� Date,
PRINT NAME
S: (Planning Department1C D B\Agendas DRC & CDBICDBI2015109 September 201511 Cover MEMO 2015.doc
., C�earwater
Interdepartmental Correspondence Sheet
TO, Community Development Board Members
FROM, Robert Tefft, Development Review Manager
COPIES, Carrillo Soto, Assistant City Attorney; Susan Chase, Documents and Records Specialist, /Pat
Sullivan, Board Reporter
SUBJECT, Agenda Items for Septemberl 5, 2015
DATE, September 08„ 2015
CDB packets being distributed contain the following.
Site investigation form
Unapproved minutes of previous meeting August 18, 2015 will be emailed to you on
Monday, September 14, 2015
LEVEL TWO APPLICATIONS (ITEMS 1 -2)
1. Case�D2015 -06025 - 706 Bayway Boulevard Presenter: Mark T. Parry, AICP, Senior
Yes No
2. Case: FLD2015 -06023 - 249 Windward Passage Case: Presenter: Mathew Jackson, Senior
Planner
Yes V No
APPEALS (ITEMS 1)
1. Case: APP2015-00001 - 1500 S. Belcher Road Presenter: Mathew Jackson, Senior Planner
Yes V No
I have conducted a personal investigation on the personal site visit to the following properties
PRINT NAME
1ZZ
Date, 9//5(4
S: (Planning Department\C D BlAgendas DRC & CDBICDBI2015109 September 2015■1 Cover MEMO 2015.doc
TO
FROM
COPIES.
O
} Cleamater
U
Interdepartmental Correspondence Sheet
Community Development Board Members
Robert Tefft, Development Review Manager
Camilo Soto, Assistant City Attorney; Susan Chase, Documents and Records Specialist, /Pat
Sullivan, Board Reporter
SUBJECT. Agenda Items for Septemberl 5, 2015
DATE. September 08„ 2015
CDB packets being distributed contain the following.
Site investigation form
Unapproved minutes of previous meeting August 18, 2015 will be emailed to you on
Monday, September 14, 2015
LEVEL TWO APPLICATIONS (ITEMS 1 -2)
1. CasD2015 -06025 — 706 Bayway Boulevard Presenter: Mark T. Parry, AICP, Senior
Yes No
2. Case: FLD2015 -06023 — 249 Windward Passage Case: Presenter: Mathew Jackson, Senior
Planer
Yes
APPEALS (ITEMS 1)
1. Case: APP2015 -00001 — 1500 S. Belcher Road Presenter: Mathew Jackson, Senior Planner
I have conducted a
rsonal investigation on the personal site visit to the following properties
Date: (A\ -3 1 L3
PRINT NAME
S: (Planning Department\C D B1Agendas DRC & CDBICDB12015109 September 201511 Cover MEMO 2015.doc
TO
FROM
COPIES:
,_ ci
O
>_ Clearwater
U
..........„................................................
Interdepartmental Correspondence Sheet
Community Development Board Members
Robert Tefft, Development Review Manager
Camilo Soto, Assistant City Attorney; Susan Chase, Documents and Records Specialist, /Pat
Sullivan, Board Reporter
SUBJECT. Agenda Items for Septemberl 5, 2015
DATE September 08„ 2015
CDB packets being distributed contain the following.
Site investigation form
Unapproved minutes of previous meeting August 18, 2015 will be emailed to you on
Monday, September 14, 2015
LEVEL TWO APPLICATIONS (ITEMS 1 -2)
1. Case: FLD2015 -06025 — 706 Bayway Boulevard Presenter: Mark T. Parry, AICP, Senior
Yes ) No
2. Case: FLD2015 -06023 — 249 Windward Passage Case: Presenter: Mathew Jackson, Senior
Planner
Yes 5r No
APPEALS (ITEMS 1)
1. Case: APP2015 -00001 — 1500 S. Belcher Road Presenter: Mathew Jackson, Senior Planner
Yes . No
Ihave conducted a personal investigation on the personal site visit to the following properties
Signature:
r<74c_f_147:47
PRINT NAME
Date: /
5 t
S:\Planning Department\C D BlAgendas DRC & CDBICDBI2015109 September 201511 Cover MEMO 2015.doc
LL
>_ cl
Clearwater
_...„.„..........„,......
F
U
.........„.,w,.
Interdepartmental Correspondence Sheet
TO Community Development Board Members
FROM, Robert Tefft, Development Review Manager
COPIES, Camilo Soto, Assistant City Attorney; Susan Chase, Documents and Records Specialist, /Pat
Sullivan, Board Reporter
SUBJECT: Agenda Items for September) 5, 2015
DATE: September 08„ 2015
CDB packets being distributed contain the following:
Site investigation form
Unapproved minutes of previous meeting August 18, 2015 will be emailed to you on
Monday, September 14, 2015
LEVEL TWO APPLICATIONS (ITEMS 1 -2)
1. Case: FLD2015 -06025 - 706 Bayway Boulevard Presenter: Mark T. Parry, AICP, Senior
Yes No
2. Case: FLD2015 -06023 - 249 Windward Passage Case: Presenter: Mathew Jackson, Senior
Planner
Yes
APPEALS (ITEMS 1)
1. Case: APP2015- 00001- 1500 S. Belcher Road Presenter: Mathew Jackson, Senior Planner
Yes Noo
I have conducted a personal investigation on the personal site visit to the following properties
Signature:
r" -vta.r
PRINT NAME
Date, 7/15/
S: (Planning Department\C D BlAgendas DRC & CDBICDB12015109 September 201511 Cover MEMO 2015.doc
:ater
U
.........,...w,.
Interdepartmental Correspondence Sheet
TO, Community Development Board Members
FROM, Robert Tefft, Development Review Manager
COPIES, Camilo Soto, Assistant City Attorney; Susan Chase, Documents and Records Specialist, /Pat
Sullivan, Board Reporter
SUBJECT, Agenda Items for Septemberl 5, 2015
DATE, September 08„ 2015
CDB packets being distributed contain the following.
Site investigation form
Unapproved minutes of previous meeting August 18, 2015 will be emailed to you on
Monday, September 14, 2015
LEVEL TWO APPLICATIONS (ITEMS 1 -2)
1. Case: F3.62015 -06025 — 706 Bayway Boulevard Presenter: Mark T. Parry, AICP, Senior
Yes V' No
2. Case: FLD2015 -06023 — 249 Windward Passage Case: Presenter: Mathew Jackson, Senior
Planner
Yes No
APPEALS (ITEMS 1)
1. Case: APP2015- 00001— 1500 S. Belcher Road Presenter: Mathew Jackson, Senior Planner
Yes
I have conduct
Signature:
a pe nal " ation on the personal site visit to the following properties
Date, 11642665- / ' 6 /2Q 6 5
S: (Planning Department\C D BlAgendas DRC & CDBICDBI2015109 September 201511 Cover MEMO 2015.doc