FLD2015-00623Y �l�a������
, ti _�:-_''_,�' ''- --�'P`R✓,'�``"'�..:!/'.,~`. -J;
-.. _ �
.e_ _ -._,r-�,.�, _�.��„ _-
MEETING DATE:
AGENDA ITEM:
CASE:
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
September 15, 2015
E.2.
FLD2015-00623
REQUEST: Flexible Development approval to permit the expansion of the Clearwater
Marine Aquarium within the Commercial (C) District with a lot area of
197,115 square feet (4.53 acres), a lot width of 546.3 feet, front (north)
setbacks of 101 feet (to building) and 14.8 feet (to pavement), rear (south)
setbacks of 11.8 feet (to building) and zero feet (to marina promenade), side
(east) setbacks of 23.1 feet (to building) and zero feet (to marina promenade),
side (west) setbacks of 34 feet (to building) and zero feet (to marina
promenade), and side (north) setbacks of 30.5 feet (to building) and zero feet
(to pavement), a building height of 28.5 feet, and 153 off-street parking spaces
as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project pursuant to Community
Development Code Section 2-704.F. along with reductions to the perimeter
buffer requirements along the easternmost property line from 10 feet to 3.5
feet, the south property lines from 15 feet to zero feet, and the north (non-
Windward Passage) property lines from 10 feet to zero feet, a reduction from
the required number of trees within interior landscape islands from 46 to 14,
and a reduction to the width of interior landscape islands from 17 feet to eight
feet as a Comprehensive Landscape Program pursuant to Community
Development Code Section 3-1202.G., with a two-year Development Order.
GENERAL DATA:
Agent... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .....
Owner ... ............................
Location ... . .. ... ... . .... .. .. .... . ,
Property Size .........................
Future Land Use Plan...........
Zoning... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
Adjacent Zoning......... North
South
East
West
Existing Land Use ..................
Proposed Land Use ... ... ... .....
Scott McClelland, Inside Out Group, Incorporated
Clearwater Marine Aquarium
249 Windward Passage; south side of Windward Passage approximately 210
feet west of Island Way.
4.53 acres
Commercial General (CG)
Commercial (C) District
Commercial (C) and Medium Density Residential (MDR) Districts
Preservation (P) District
Commercial (C) and Preservation (P) Districts
Commercial (C) and Preservation (P) Districts
Aquarium and Marina
Aquarium and Marina
' 1�11.(�ti r,L�LeI Level II Flexibie Development Application Review
o � . . . . �a��^��,..�^r<, :, . .. �
ANALYSIS:
Site Location and Existing Conditions:
The 4.53-acre subject property is located on
the south side of Windward Passage
approximately 210 feet west of Island Way.
The property is comprised of three separate
parcels of land that when combined result in an
awkward property configuration. The property
is within the Commercial (C) District and the
Commercial General (CG) Future Land Use
Plan (FLUP) classification.
The site is developed with the Clearwater
Marine Aquarium including a 19 dock marina
as described in detail below.
The immediate area is characterized by a
variety of uses including attached dwellings,
offices, marina, automobile service station,
restaurant, retail plaza and bank uses with
heights ranging from one to six stories.
Site History:
On May 17, 2011 the Community
Development Board approved the Level II
Flexible Development application (FLD2011-
02006) for the expansion of the Clearwater
Marine Aquarium to include the follow�ng:
❑ The construction of an approximate 11,000
square feet of new floor area for the
Clearwater Marine Aquarium building to
include a new lobby and gift shop, as well
as a new outdoor tank exhibit area with a
660-seat outdoor stadium;
❑ The construction of several new outdoor
aquatic tanks along the west side of the
Clearwater Marine Aquarium building;
❑ The construction of a new 205-space, four-
level parking garage between the
Clearwater Marine Aquarium building and
Windward Passage;
❑ The construction of a new 118-space
surface parking lot on the eastern third of
the subject property;
PROJECT
S►TE
;
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DMSION
�.`� '
�� ��\ _
U
\` �
�
` �� i � i �
�
, .
�
., ,
�� . ._. � '� � i� �
`�w��ee�� e r
_r �.� ��
��� ,, i �� � �
.��� �_ � J� j i
�;q�; ` `�j � J , �.�
. �y
� � `'
�����\.., �.
LOCATION MAP
''�`� �y Di ��
��9�+oA �ttached �, T.s ,
ri�uvia s�F welliti s Rettil
'• Uffices Pl��'
.�� ., •. B�u�
•• . �••,
��:� � ��' � ry4"•�1���������n�•
.;r?o,9 ti �� Automobile
'.� � �.� Service
�'•. •"•. �+ Station
•., .• •.
.,. .: •.. ,.
�t��• �� i F
�lC`�.. ~ �lC`�luC�l
�..
o'p, _ �s
's�cs �,�� ,�
�,�. �.
Community Development Board — September 15, 2015
FLD2015-06023 — Page 1
r C�L�1 /'!' aLl,l Level II Flexible Development Application Review PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
. . .. .. . �:��;a�: �,"2:.� � . . . .
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DMSION
❑ The construction of a new 12-foot to 14-foot wide marina promenade along that portion of
the property abutting the Mandalay Channel;
❑ The installation of a loading zone, dumpster enclosure and "T" turnaround for Fire
Department access at the termination of the right-of-way for Marina Way on the subject
property;
❑ The installation of perimeter, interior and foundation landscaping throughout the site; and
❑ The installation of stormwater drainage improvements including a vault beneath the surface
parking area.
The improvements have been constructed with the exception of 11,000 square feet of new floor
area for the CMA building which was to include a lobby, gift shop, outdoor tank exhibit area
with a 660-seat outdoor stadium and the 205-space parking garage.
Development Proposal:
The development proposal consists of replacing two temporary structures (ticket booth/ kiosk
and concession stand/ gift shop/ pelican enclosure) constructed for filming of the two Dolphin
Tale movies. The permanent structures will consist of a one-story ticket booth (150 square feet)
and two-story building (6,650 square feet) to include a concession standl gift shop and pelican
enclosure. There will be no change to the existing impervious surface ratio, setbacks,
landscaping or vehicular use areas.
The new building height will be 28.5 feet from base flood elevation to top of arched roof where the
existing building height is 22 feet from base flood elevation to the top of flat roof. The design of
the new buildings is to be consistent with the design of the existing buildings. The one and two-
story building exteriors will have a consistent color, graphics and window fenestration of the
existing facility.
This development proposal is being reviewed as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project
(CIRP) as the development was approved through Level II CIRP application FLD2011-02006
and the proposal does not meet the minor revision criteria pursuant to CDC Section 4-406.
Specifically, the proposal results in a substantial change to the location of previously approved
structures by removing the outdoor seating area and parking garage and adding the two-story gift
shop/ pelican enclosure and one-story ticket kiosk.
Special Area Plan:
None
Development Parameters:
Floor Area Ratio (FAR�:
Pursuant to the Countywide Plan Rules and CDC Section 2-701.1, the maximum floor area ratio
(FAR) for properties with a future land use plan designation of CG is 0.55. The proposed
expansion will result in a total gross floor area of 57,203 square feet at a FAR of 0.29, which is
consistent with Code provisions.
Community Development Board — September 15, 2015
FLD2015-06023 — Page 2
Y Cl��l 1'1'[tl�e� Level II Flexible Development Application Review FLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION
. e .. . �4�x'k;'?� .. . . �
Impervious Surface Ratio (ISRZ
Pursuant to the Countywide Plan Rules and CDC Section 2-701.1, the maximum allowable ISR
within the CG FLUP category is 0.95. The overall proposed ISR of 0.85 is consistent with Code
provisions.
Minimum Lot Area and Width:
Pursuant to CDC Table 2-704, there is no minimum required lot area or lot width for a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. The lot area of the subject property is 197,115
square feet (4.53 acres) while the lot width along Windward Passage is 546.3 feet. It is noted
that the lot area/width of the subject property exceeds that which is typical for uses in the C
District.
Minimum Setbacks:
Pursuant to CDC Table 2-704, there are no minimum required setbacks for a Comprehensive
Infill Redevelopment Project. The development proposal includes existing front (north) setbacks
of 101 feet (to building) and 14.8 feet (to pavement), rear (south) setbacks of 11.8 feet (to
building) and zero feet (to marina promenade), side (east) setbacks of 23.1 feet (to building) and
zero feet (to marina promenade), side (west) setbacks of 34 feet (to building) and zero feet (to
marina promenade), and side (north) setbacks of 30.5 feet (to building) and zero feet (to
pavement). As previously mentioned, there are no changes in setbacks as otherwise approved
through Level II Flexible Development application FLD2011-02006.
The rear setback of zero feet accommodates the paver brick promenade along the entire length of
the waterfront property line. The promenade provides a clearly defined path for pedestrian
traffic along the waterfront and facilitates easy access to the existing marina/boat slips.
Maacimum Buildin�ei�
Pursuant to CDC Table 2-704, there is no m�imum height for a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project. The greatest height for the entire project is for the arched roof over the
new gift shop/ pelican enclosure with a height of 28.5 feet from base flood elevation to the top of
arched roof. It is noted that the proposed height is within the maximum range established for
multiple uses within the C District and is compatible with the surrounding buildings.
Minimum Off-Street Parkin�:
Pursuant to CDC Table 2-704, the minimum off-street parking requirement for a Comprehensive
Iniill Redevelopment Project shall be determined by the Community Development Coordinator
based on the specific use and/or ITE Manual standards.
During the review of the FLD2011-02006 a parking requirement was established based upon a
review of the ITE Manual. As the ITE Manual does not include an aquarium land use category;
alternate, similar comparables were sought out within the ITE Manual for the proposed
use/elements. Based upon discussions with the applicant as well as the City's Traffic
Engineering staff, the principal aquarium building was found to be most consistent with the
Museum land use requiring 1.32 spaces per 1,000 square feet or 53 spaces. The outdoor stadium/
tank area was found to be consistent with the Live Theatre land use which required 1 space per 3
seats or 82 spaces.
Community Development Board — September 15, 2015
FLD2015-06023 — Page 3
� C�eai ��iL�l Level II Flexible Development Application Review FLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
- DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION
?� �s�s'k�"��„L�^2�'*,:�:,,^��?.:;..^: .. . � � �
Based upon the above, the combined total of required off-street parking spaces for the principal
aquarium building, the outdoor stadium/tank area, and the marina (14 spaces) is 149. The
application currently before the CDB proposes 153 total off-street parking spaces for the
property, and therefore meets the requirements of CDC Table 2-704.
It is important to note that the parking demand in 2011 did not take into account the actual
demand created by the popular polphin Tale movies. Due to the movie exposure the actual
parking demand has required off-site parking areas to include on-street parking, the adjacent
Island Way Grill, two grass lots on the east side of Island Way, and lot area on the nearby St.
Brendan Catholic Church located at 245 Dory Passage. It is expected that as the interest
generated by the Dolphin Tale movies wanes that the adequate on-street parking will be available
without the need for off-site parking. Notwithstanding this expectation, staff will be monitoring
the parking conditions of the site and the applicant understands that they will be required to forgo
the temporary dirt lot parking by the end of 2015.
Mechanical Equipment:
Pursuant to CDC Section 3-201.D.1, all outside mechanical equipment must be screened on all
four sides so as not to be visible from public streets and/or abutting properties. There is existing
mechanical equipment located throughout the site screened from view by buildings, walls or
fencing.
Sight Visibilitv Trian l�es_.�
Pursuant to CDC Section 3-904.A, to minimize hazards at the driveway on Windward Passage
no structures or landscaping may be installed which will obstruct views at a level between 30
inches above grade and eight feet above grade within 20-foot sight visibility triangles. This
proposal has been reviewed by the City's Traffic Engineering Department and been found to be
acceptable. Shrubbery planted within the sight visibility triangles will need to be maintained to
meet the Code requirements.
Utilities:
Pursuant to CDC Section 3-912, for development that does not involve a subdivision, all utilities
including individual distribution lines must be installed underground unless such undergrounding
is not practicable. Should this application be approved, all utilities serving the new buildings
must be located underground in compliance with the Code requirement.
Landscapin�
Pursuant to CDC Sections 3-1202.D.1 and 3, there is a 15-foot wide landscape buffer required
along the property lines abutting the Mandalay Channel/Causeway right-of-way. The proposal
includes a reduction to the landscape buffer along the Mandalay Channel/Causeway right-of-way
from 15 feet to zero feet.
Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.E.1, one tree is required within an interior landscape island for
every 150 square feet of required green space. The proposal includes a reduction to this
requirement from 46 to 14.
Community Development Board — September 15, 2015
FLD2015-06023 — Page 4
Y Cl�(�1 ►'1'�L�l Level II Flexible Development Application Review PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT
_
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DMSION
u
. R�.+?a, ` �� ' _ ' .
Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.E.1.c, a11 interior landscape islands shall have a minimum
width of 17 feet as measured from back of curb to back of curb. The proposal includes a
reduction to this requirement from 17 to eight feet.
Comprehensive Landscape Program: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.G., the landscaping
requirements contained within the Code can be waived or modified if the application contains a
Comprehensive Landscape Program satisfying certain criteria. The following table depicts the
consistency of the development proposal with those criteria:
Consistent Inconsistent
1. Architectural theme:
a. The landscaping in a comprehensive landscape program shall be designed as a N/A N/A
part of the architectural theme of the principle buildings proposed or developed on
the parcel proposed for development; or
b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment X
proposed in the comprehensive landscape program shall be demonstrably more
attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for
development under the minimum landscape standards.
2. Lighting: Any lighting proposed as a part of a comprehensive landscape program is X
automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the business is closed.
3. Communiry character.• The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive X
landscape program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater.
4. Property values: The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive landscape X
program will have a beneficial impact on the value of property in the immediate
vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
5. Special area or scenic corridor plan: The landscape treatment proposed in the N/A N/A
comprehensive landscape program is consistent with any special area or scenic
corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in
which the parcel proposed for development is located.
The majority of the perimeter landscape buffer either meets or, as in the case of the buffer
adjacent to Windward Passage, exceeds the minimums established in the Code. The exception to
this is the south perimeter buffer abutting the Mandalay Channel/Causeway right-of-way.
Perimeter buffers are typically desirable elements in the site design; however in the instance of
the required south perimeter buffer its provision would actually be an impediment to the
functionality of the site, impeding access to the existing, abutting marina/boat slips. As such, the
applicant constructed a paver brick promenade along the entire length of the waterfront property
line. This promenade provides a clearly defined path for pedestrian traffic along the waterfront
and facilitates easy access to the existing marina/boat slips.
With regard to the interior of the surface parking area the proposal meets the majority of the
applicable Code requirements. However, the application does request a reduction of the
requirement to provide 46 trees within interior landscape islands (1 per 150 square feet of
required green space) to 14 trees. While only 30% of the otherwise required interior trees
provided, it does not appear to be possible for the site to accommodate any further interior trees
without substantially impacting the number of available off-street parking spaces through the
addition of more landscape islands, or by planting further trees in the already proposed landscape
islands at the expense of reducing the spacing between the trees and compromising the viability
of all trees to be planted.
Community Development Board — September 15, 2015
FLD2015-06023 — Page 5
� C�Lai n' aLeA Level II Flexible Develo ment PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
p Application Review DEVELOPMENTREVIEWDMSION
� �.. . _� :�w� w,��,.., �
As previously mentioned, there is no change to the landscaping approved through FLD2011-
02006. Included in the approval was the current parking layout as well as interior landscape
islands. An eight foot back of curb to back of curb dimension was approved for the islands and
revising the parking layout to accommodate the current Code requirement of 17 feet would be
impractical and potentially result in the loss of off-street parking spaces.
Solid Waste:
There is an existing dumpster locate south of the terminus of Marina Way. The dumpsters are
screened on the top and sides by stucco walls painted to match the building. The front of the
enclosure has white gates. The proposal has been found to be acceptable by the City's Solid
Waste and Fire Departments.
Comprehensive Plan:
The proposal is supported by various Goals, Objectives and/or Policies of the City's
Comprehensive Plan as follows:
Future Land Use Plan Element
Policy A. 3.2.1 - All new development or redevelopment of properry within the City of Clearwater
shall meet all landscape requirements of the Community Development Code.
The proposal, as discussed, meets the requirements of the CDC providing perimeter landscaping
along Windward Passage and interior landscape areas. Therefore, the proposal supports this
Policy.
Objective A.6.6 - Tourism is a substantial element of the City's economic base and as such the
City shall continue to support the maintenance and enhancement of this important economic
sector.
The proposal includes the expansion of the existing Clearwater Marine Aquarium and
rehabilitation center which has operated on the site since 1978 and also receives an adequate
level of service. The proposed expansion will allow the CMA to continue to support the tourist
and residential bases by providing upgrades to the site. Improvements include replacing
temporary ticket kiosk, concession area and pelican viewing area with permanent Code
compliant structures. The fa�ades of the buildings will be consistent with the existing matching
the finish, colors and window fenestration. Therefore, the proposal supports these Objectives
and Policies.
Community Development Code:
The proposal is supported by the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this
Code as follows:
Section 1-103.B.1. Allowing property owners to enhance the value of their property through
innovative and creative redevelopment.
The property owners will make improvements to the site through replacing temporary structures
needed during filming of the Dolphin Tale movies with permanent Code compliant structures
that include architectural treatments consistent with the existing buildings. Existing landscaping
enhances the site with buffers between the subject property and adjacent rights-of-way as well as
Community Development Board — September 15, 2015
FLD2015-06023 — Page 6
� C�ea� tt ctLl.r Level II Flexible Development Application Review PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
° ��n . . . . . .� :�,+.�"� ..t .. . .
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DMSION
interior landscaping. Furthermore, the value of the property is enhanced through the proposed
permanent structures for the existing aquarium use of the property which will continue to serve
the surrounding community and City as a whole.
Section 1-103.B.2. Ensuring that development and redevelopment will not have a negative
impact on the value of surrounding properties and wherever practicable promoting development
and redevelopment which will enhance the value of surrounding properties.
Surrounding properties to the north, east and west have been developed with residential and a
variety of non-residential uses including attached dwellings, offices, marina, automobile service
station, restaurant, retail plaza and bank. The proposal includes the expansion of the existing
Clearwater Marine Aquarium and rehabilitation center that has served the immediate and
surrounding properties since 1978. The existing landscaping enhances the buffering of the site.
It is anticipated that the proposal will result in allowing the CMA to provide a positive impact
on the surrounding properties. Therefore, the proposal supports this Code section.
Section 2-701.1 Intent of the Commercial Zoning District and CG classification.
The CDC provides that it is the intent and purpose of the Commercial District is to provide the
citizens of the City of Clearwater with convenient access to goods and services throughout the
city without adversely impacting the integrity of residential neighborhoods, diminishing the
scenic quality of the city or negatively impacting the safe and efficient movement of people and
things within the City of Clearwater.
The proposal will provide for the expansion of the existing Clearwater Marine Aquarium. The
aquarium and rehabilitation center has existed at the site since 1978 and the improvements will
enhance the customer experience to the CMA and provide upgrades for the convenience and
safety of the visitors and staff. The nearby uses are residential and commercial and are expected
to continue to benefit from the operation of the CMA.
Code Enforcement Analysis:
There is no active Code Compliance case for the subject property.
Community Development Board — September 15, 2015
FLD2015-06023 — Page 7
' U�l�ar�aLel Level II Flexible Development Application Review
. . . . . . .. ,...e a�.a . . .
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION
Compliance with Standards And Criteria:
The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the standards for
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Projects as per CDC Tables 2-701.1 and 2-704 (C
District):
Standard Proposed Consistentl Inconsistent
Floor Area Ratio 0.55 p,29 X
Impervious Surface Ratio 0.95 p,gg X
Minimum Lot Area N/A 197,115 square feet X
Minimum Lot Width N/A 546.3 feet (Windward Passage) X
Minimum Setbacks Front: North: N/A 101 feet (to building) X
14.8 feet (to paving)
Rear: South: N/A 11.8 feet (to building) X
zero feet (to marina
promenade)
Side: North: N/A 30.5 feet (to building) X
East: N/A 23.1 feet (to building)
zero feet (to marina
promenade)
West: N/A 34 feet (to building) X
zero feet (to marina
promenade)
Maximum Height N/A 28.5 feet from base flood X
elevation to top of arched roof
Minimum Determined by the 153 spaces }{
Off-Street Parking Community Development
Coordinator based on the
specific use and/or ITE
Manual standazds
,
�ee ana[ysrs in J'tajJ Keport
Compliance with Flexibility Criteria:
The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility
criteria as per CDC Section 2-1004.A. (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project):
i. 1ne development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the
use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district.
2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the
Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning
objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district.
3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development
and improvement of surrounding properties.
4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed
development.
Community Development Board — September 15, 2015
FLD2015-06023 — Page 8
Consistent Inconsistent
X
�
X
i:�
� C�La� 1'Tat�el Level II Flexible Development Application Review PLANNWG& DEVELOPMENT
�- � DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION
v: ... e . _, ��i �"> �.e. . . . ..
5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category,
be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use
characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of
the following objectives:
a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible
standard or flexible development use;
b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic
base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs;
c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an
existing economic contributor;
d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing;
e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is
characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and
rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or
f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a
working waterfront use.
6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are
justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives:
a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and
improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district;
b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the
City;
c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established
or emerging chazacter of an area;
d. In order to form a cohesive, visualiy interesting and attractive appearance, the
proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design
elements:
❑ Changes in horizontal building planes;
❑ Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters,
porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.;
❑ Variety in materials, colors and textures;
❑ Distinctive fenestration patterns;
❑ Building stepbacks; and
O Distinctive roofs forms.
e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape
design and appropriate distances between buildings.
Community Development Board — September 15, 2015
FLD2015-06023 — Page 9
�
�i
' l��LtRI 1'�Lil�� Level II Flexible Development Application Review
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
DEVELOPMENT REVTEW DIVISION
Compliance with General Applicability Standards:
The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General
Standards for Level Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3-914.A:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage,
density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of adjacent
land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing
or working in the neighborhood.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate
vicinity.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual,
acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation imnacts on adiacent nronerties.
Consistent Inconsistent
X
X
X
X
X
X
Compliance with Comprehensive Landscape Program Standards:
The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the
Comprehensive Landscape Program as per CDC Section 3-1202.G:
1. Architectural theme.
a. The landscaping in a comprehensive landscape program shall be designed as a part of
the architectural theme of the principal buildings proposed or developed on the parcel
proposed for development; or
b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in
the comprehensive landscape program shall be demonstrably more attractive than
landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the
minimum landscape standards
2. Lighting. Any lighting proposed as a part of a comprehensive landscape program is
automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the business is closed.
3. Community character. The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive landscape
program will enhance the community character of the City of Cleazwater.
4. Property values. The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive landscape
program will have a beneficial impact on the value of property in the immediate vicinity of
the parcel proposed for development.
Consistent I Inconsistent
X
X
X
X
5. Special area or scenic corridor plan. The landscape treahnent proposed in the N/A
comprehensive landscape program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor
plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel
proposed for develonment is located.
N/A
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials
at its meeting of September 03, 2015 and deemed the development proposal to be legally
sufficient, based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law:
Findings of Fact:
The Planning and Development Department, having reviewed all evidence submitted by the
applicant and requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that there is substantial
competent evidence to support the following findings of fact:
Community Development Board — September 15, 2015
FLD2015-06023 — Page 10
� C�eai ►tal�el Level II Flexible Develo ment FLANNING&DEVELOPMENT
_ p Application Review DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION
.. . ,. . 3.�'�s'+`°'e,l` s. .' . . . .
1. The 4.53-acre subject property is located on the south side of Windward Passage
approximately 210 feet west of Island Way;
2. The subject property is zoned Commercial (C) District with an underlying future land use
plan designation of Commercial General (CG);
3. The subject property has approximately 416.12 feet of frontage along Windward Passage;
4. The building setbacks are 101 feet (front), 11.8 feet (rear), 23.1 and 34 feet (side);
5. The pavement setbacks are 14.8 feet (front), zero feet (rear), and zero feet (sides);
6. That the building will have a height of 28.6 feet from base flood elevation to top of arched
roof;
7. That based upon discussions with the applicant and the City's Traffic Engineering staff, as
well as in reviewing comparable land uses in the ITE Manual, the off-street parking
requirement for the development proposal has been determined to be 149 parking spaces and
153 parking spaces are proposed;
8. That the development proposal will be compatible with the surrounding areas; and
9. That there are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property.
Conclusions of Law:
The Planning and Development Department, having made the above findings of fact, reaches the
following conclusions of law:
1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Community
Development Code (CDC) Tables 2-701.1 and 2-704;
2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria set forth in CDC
Sections 2-704.C;
3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two
Approvals as per CDC Section 3-914.A; and
4. That the development proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Landscape Program
criteria as per CDC Section 3-1202.G.
Based upon the above, the Planning and Development Department recommends APPROVAL of
this Flexible Development approval to permit the expansion of the Clearwater Marine Aquarium
within the Commercial (C) District with a lot area of 197,115 square feet (4.53 acres), a lot width
of 546.3 feet, front (north) setbacks of 101 feet (to building) and 14.8 feet (to pavement), rear
(south) setbacks of 11.8 feet (to building) and zero feet (to marina promenade), side (east)
setbacks of 23.1 feet (to building) and zero feet (to marina promenade), side (west) setbacks of
34 feet (to building) and zero feet (to marina promenade), and side (north) setbacks of 30.5 feet
(to building) and zero feet (to pavement), a building height of 28.5 feet, and 153 off-street
parking spaces as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project pursuant to Community
Development Code Section 2-704.F. along with reductions to the perimeter buffer requirements
along the easternmost property line from 10 feet to 3.5 feet, the south property lines from 15 feet
to zero feet, and the north (non-Windward Passage) property lines from 10 feet to zero feet, a
reduction from the required number of trees within interior landscape islands from 46 to 14, and
a reduction to the width of interior landscape islands from 17 feet to eight feet as a
Comprehensive Landscape Program pursuant to Community Development Code Section 3-
1202.G., with a two-year Development Order, subject to the following conditions:
Community Development Board — September 15, 2015
FLD2015-06023 — Page 11
} C1LN1 �t[�l�l.l Level II Flexible DevelopmentApplication Review PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT
_ . .�. .'� _ . ...
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION
Conditions of Approval:
1. That the application for a building permit be submitted no later than September 15, 2017,
unless time extensions are granted pursuant to the CDC;
2. That the final design, color, and elevations of the proposed buildings be consistent with the
conceptual design, color, and elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB;
3. That any electric and communication panels, boxes, and meters located on the exterior of the
building be painted the same color as the building;
4. That any future signage must meet the requirements of Code and be architecturally integrated
with the design of the building with regard to proportion, color, material and finish as part of
a final sign package submitted to and approved by Staff;
5. That prior to the issuance of any building permit, all General Planning, Engineering and
Parks and Recreation conditions are met;
6. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, the existing Parking Easement granting an
easement from the Clearwater Marine Aquarium to the City for 24 off-street parking spaces
on the subject property be released;
7. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, the correct number of existing municipal
slips be provided;
8. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, a new Parking Easement granting an
easement from the Clearwater Marine Aquarium to the City for municipal slip off-street
parking spaces on the subject property is recorded in the Public Records;
9. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, the site plan be updated to reflect the
appropriate off-street parking spaces as "Reserved for Municipal Slip Usage";
10. That prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, proof of recording a unity of title
for the three parcels (08-29-15-00000-130-0700, 08-29-15-43380-003-0050 and 08-29-15-
43380-003-0070) be submitted to the Planning and Development Department;
11. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, all General Engineering conditions
are met;
12. That prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, all utilities, including individual
distribution lines serving this development within the right-of-way along the north property
line, must be installed underground unless undergrounding is not practicable;
13. That issuance of a development permit by the City of Clearwater does not in any way create
any right on the part of an applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and
does not create any liability on the part of the City for issuance of the permit if the applicant
fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal
agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law;
14. That all other applicable local, state and/or federal permits be obtained before
commencement of the development;
15. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, the Fire Department may require the
provision of a Water Study performed by a Fire Protection Engineer in order to ensure that an
adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the
developer due to the impact of the project. The water supply must be able to support the
needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required,
then the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity.
Prepared by Planning and Development Department Staf •
tt Jackson, Senior Planner
ATTACHMENTS: Photographs, Resume
Community Development Board — September 15, 2015
FLD2015-06023 — Page 12
,j�,; ��►-; - � - _- _ �,. �
,. � �:� , �nr r. ^i
�� � _; ; ,e`�J,i�!�f�' ! il+
� ..:.�<A.r..
,. ... _ �-. . . ..,.rv;..r__ ,e..
_ J-.. _
i'..a�°—�� '
� . ._ . .. ._ _r. . ...
Looking south at the site from Windward Passage
Looking west at properties to the northwest of the site.
� � ,� � �,, '.�
�.: t,.. .
..... .c..,T n � q,
' e �_
�..�, . . �' p..:._. .... ....::.. .. �..� /� ;
�s,�
� 9_ ._,�_ � ��� � ��� .
� �� �.
'; � , "'h��?�4s�nrc�#d i ��l i &��i ��� `Y.. ' .- . .
`+ �� �'��ir �;�I1 ����� � �� b �� � i � �, .. Y ,�Ii � . _
t �� _
n< �' � �
. �
d};,� . . .u..,. , .... _ . F �, ..... _r ... � . . _ � ; S i Y.::
Looking east at the parking and interior landscaping.
� . , ��.,a�. � , , ���°���,,� t ,-f,
—.�r �Jiv�]�.�jr�.a,Xr;�! . �t.r.
�I ��y •: 't .
J. �''{' � ' t"v� •k : -
� 1 ..� , .,_, �
� -. � .
� �
�
;
� �:� �
i3„ ,..,r .
�+'
Looking southeast at a portion of the waterfront site.
�;
Looking southeast at a portion of the waterfront site.
Looking east along Windward Passage.
249 Windward Passage
FLD2015-06023
Matthew Jackson
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
(727) 562-4504
matthew. iackson(�a,mvclearwater.com
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
❑ Senior Planner
February 2013 to present
City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida
Duties include performing the technical review and preparation of staff reports for various land
development applications, the organization of data and its display in order to track information and
provide status reports, and making presentations to various City Boards and Committees.
❑ Planner II
City of Clearwater, Cleanvater, Florida May 2011 to February 2013
October 2008 to June 2010
Regulate growth and development of the City in accordance with land resource ordinances and
regulations related to community development. Landscape plan review including: conceptual, and
variance. Reviews and analyzes site plans and conducts field studies to determine the integity of
development plans and their compatibility with surroundings. Interdepartmental and zoning
assistance. Respond as a City representative to citizens, City officials, and businesses concerning
ordinances and regulations. Make recommendations and presentations at staff level at various review
committees, boards, and meetings.
o Planner I
Calvin-Giordano and Associates, Fort Lauderdale, Florida May 2005 to December 2007
Project manager for various development applications such as plat, site plan, rezoning and variances.
In-depth government agency, in-house and client coordination to ensure that the projects maintained
submittal schedules stayed within budget constraints and attained approval. Schedule and lead
project kick-off ineetings, ensure municipal project conditions were resolved, produce supporting
documents and make site visits as well. Research and prepare due diligence reports including subject
matter such as zoning, land uses, densities, available public utilities and land development costs.
Member of emergency mitigation committee formed to prepare and mitigate for natural or man-made
disasters affecting Calvin, Giordano and Associates and local municipalities.
❑ Manager
Church Street Entertainment, Orlando, Florida September 1999 to February 2004
Supervised and managed daytime and nighttime operations of a bar and nightclub entertainment
complex including 100+ staff. Conducted hiring and training operations including security and
inventory control. Managed and reconciled nightly gross revenues as well as preparing and
delivering deposits. Assisted in taking inventory and preparing weekly inventory orders, marketing
and special events.
❑ Linguist
US Army, Fort Campbell, KY October 1991 to October 1995
Maintain fluency in the Arabic language and knowledge of customs and culture as well as military
readiness for possible deployments or training operations. Co-managed intelligence gathering
operation in Haiti including coordination between multiple Special Forces units and civilian
authorities. Interpreter between U.S. and Egyptian soldiers during training exercises. Liaison
between Special Forces battalions to coordinate certification training.
EDUCATION
❑ Master of Arts, Urban and Regional Planning, Florida Atlantic University, 2007
❑ Bachelor of Arts, Urban and Regional Planning, Rollins College, 2004
� _� rt,� �;,
' ° � � '°�',t � .
�; `� � ` :=� J I
Planning & Development Department
Flexible Development Application
Attached Dwellings, Mixed-Uses orNon-Residential Uses
IT IS INCUMBENT UPON THE APPLICANT TO SUBMIT COMPLETE AND CORRECT INFORMATION. ANY MISLEADING, DECEPTIVE,
INCOMPLETE OR INCORRECT INFORMATION MAY INVALIDATE YOUR APPLICATION.
AlL APPLICATIONS ARE TO BE FILLED OUT COMPLETELY AND CORRECTLY, AND SUBMITTED IN PERSON (NO FAX OR DELIVERIES)
TO THE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY NOON ON THE SCHEDULED DEADLINE DATE.
A TOTAL OF 11 COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS AND APPLICATION MATERIALS (1 ORIGINAL AND 10 COPIES) AS REQUIRED WITHIN
ARE TO BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW BY THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE. SUBSEQUENT SUBMITTAL FOR THE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD WILL REQUIRE 15 COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS AND APPLICATION MATERIALS (1 ORIGINAL
AND 14 COPIES). PLANS AND APPLICATIONS ARE REQUIRED TO BE COLLATED, STAPLED AND FOLDED INTO SETS.
THE APPLICANT, BY FILING THIS APPLICATION, AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF THE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE.
FIRE DEPT PRELIMARY SITE PLAN REVIEW FEE: $Z00
APPLICATION FEE: $j,�
PROPERTY OWNER (PER DEED): Clearwater rlarine Aquarium
MAILING ADDRESS: 249 Windward Passage, Clearwater FL 33767
PHONE NUMBER: �7z�> 9s3-ee62
EMAIL: fdame@cmaquarium.org
AGENT OR REPRESENTATIVE: scott McClelland, AR 93425, �nside out Group, xnc.
MAILING ADDRESS: B12 Louden Ave. , Dunedin, FL 34698
PHONE NUMBER: �72�> �34-3673
EMAIL: gmcclelland@iog-ioc,com
ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: 299 windward Passage, Clearwater, FL 33767
PARCEL NUMBER(S): 08-29-15-00000-130-0700, OB-29-15-43380-003-0050 6 08-29-15-93380-003-0070
LE6AL DESCRIPTION: sEE EXHIBIT ^A��
PROPOSED USE(S�: Additions to the Clearwater Marine Aquarium (Ticket Booth/Concession)
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: sEE EXHIBIT ��s��
Specifically identify the request
(include all requested code flexibility,•
e.g., reductio» in required number of
parking spaces, height, setbacks, lot
size, lot width, specific use, etc.):
Ptanning � Development DeparlmeM, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727•562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865
Page 1 of S Revised 01/12
.� "� '�ag,�e,
•� �,�:
�;� ` .
���� � � .�� �
�
Planning & Development Department
Flexible Development Application
Data Sheet
PLEASE ENSURE THAT THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS FILLED OUT, IN ITS ENTIRETY. FAILURE TO COMPLETE THIS FORM
WILL RESULT IN YOUR APPLICATION BEING FOUND iNCOMPLETE AND POSSIBLY DEFERRED UNTIL THE FOLLOWING
APPLICATION CYCLE.
ZONING DISTRICT:
FUTURE LAND USE PLAPI DESIGNATION:
EXISTING USE (currently existing on site):
C (COmmercial)
CG (Commercial General)
Marine Aquarium/Indoor Recreation & Entertainment
PROPOSED USE (new use, if any; plus existing, if to remain�: Marine Aquarium/Indoor Recreation & Entertainment
SITE AREA: 19�, lis
sq.ft. 4.ss
GROSS FLOOR AREA (total square footage of all buildings):
Existing: 50, 403 sq. ft.
Proposed: s�, 2os sq. ft.
Maximum Ailowable: los, a4z sq. ft.
acres
GROSS FLOOR AREA (total square footage devoted to each use, if there will be multiple uses):
FIfSLUSB: Museum/Aquarium Sq ft 39,974
S@COfiCIUSe: Theatre/Stadium Sq.ft 10,929
TI1it'd US2: Accessory xetai] Sq ft 6, 800
FLOOR AREA RATIO (total square footage of all buildings divided by the total square footage of entire site):
Existing: o , z 6
Proposed: �•29
Maximum Allowable: o . ss
BUILDING COVERAGE/FOOTPRINT (1" floor square footage of ail buildings):
Existing: 32� 4°z sq. ft. ( 16 % of site)
Proposed: s6,2ea Sq ft, ( ls %ofsite)
Maximum Permitted: loa, 4a2 Sq, ft, � 55 % of site)
GREEN SPACE WITHIN VEHICULAR USE AREA (green space within the parking lot and iriterior of site; not perimeter buffer):
Existing: 3, 910 sq, ft, ( s. 6 % of site}
Proposed: 3, 91 o sq, ft, ( s• 6 % of site)
VEHICULAR USE AREA (parking spaces, drive aisles, loading area):
Existing: 69, 39s sq. ft. � 35
P�OPOSeCi: 69, 395 Sq ft. � 35
9� of site)
% of site)
Planning & Development Departrnent, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865
Pa9e 2 af $ Revised 01/12
IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RATIO (total square footage of impervious areas divided by the total square footage of entire site):
Existing: o . as
Proposed: o.as
Maximum Permitted: o.9s
DENSITY (units, rooms or beds per acre):
Existing: x/A
Proposed: N/A
Maximum Permitted: N/A
OFF-STREET PARKING:
Existing: ls3
Proposed: ls3
Minimum Required: 149
BUILDING HEIGHT:
Existing: 42 . 33
Proposed: 42.33
Maximum Permitted: N/A
WHAT IS THE ESTIMATED TOTAL VALUE OF THE PROJECT UPON COMPLETION? $ ZM
ZONING DISTRICTS FOR ALL ADJACENT PROPERTY:
NOt'�h: Commercial and Medium Density Residential
South: Preservation
EdSt: Commercial and Preservation
VNeSt: Commercial and Preservation
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all Sw to an subscribed before me this day of
representations made in this application are true and . to me and/or by
accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize ,
City representatives to visit and photograph the who is personally known has
property des ' ' applicafion. produced � s identification.
� `� � .r�i - � ..��1 4 � _ �
re of property owner or representative No� public, � 1
I ''
My commission expires: �
�LIZpgE7H OUGAS
Notary Pub►Ic. Stete M Fiaida
My Comm. Expfrea May 20, 2018
No. EE 2Q0102
Planning 8 Development Department,100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Ciearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865
Page 3 of 8 Revised 01/12
LL
o Planning & Development Department
' �ater Flexible Development Application
�.
� Site Plan Submittal Package Check list
IN ADDITION TO THE COMPLETED FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT (FLD) APPLICATION, ALL FLD APPLICATIONS SHALL INCLUDE A SITE
PLAN SUBMITTAL PACKAGE THAT INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION AND/OR PLANS:
�sponses to the flexibility criteria for the specific use(s) being requested as set forth in the Zoning District(s) in which the
subject property is located. The attached Flexible Development Application Flexibility Criteria sheet shall be used to provide
ese responses.
Responses to the General Applicability criteria set forth in Section 3-914.A. The attached Flexible Development Application
eral Applicability Criteria sheet shall be used to provide these responses.
A signed and sealed survey of the property prepared by a registered land surveyor including the locafion of the property,
dimensions, acreage, location of all current structures/improvements, location of ali public and private easements including
official records book and page numbers and street right(s)-of-way within and adjacent to the site.
,�`p►❑ If the application would result in the removal or relocation of mobile home owners residing in a mobile home park as
provided in F.S. § 723.083, the application must provide that information required by Section 4-202.A.5.
N1�0 If this application is being submitted for the purpose of a boatlift, catwalk, davit, dock, marina, pier, seawall or other si milar
marine structure, then the application must provide detailed plans and specifications prepared by a Florida professional
engineer, bearing the seal and signature of the engineer, except signed and sealed plans shall not be required for the repair
or replacement of decking, stringers, railing, lower landings, tie piles, or the patching or reinforcing of existing piling on
ivate and commercial docks.
� A site plan prepared by a professional architect, engineer or landscape architect drawn to a minimum scale of one inch equals
50 f on a sheet size not to exceed 24 inches by 36 inches that includes the following information:
� 1 ex sheet of the same size shall be included with individual sheet numbers referenced thereon.
I� North arrow, scale, location map and date prepared.
❑ Identification of the boundaries of phases, if development is proposed to be constructed in phases.
❑ Location of the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL), whether the property is located within a Special Flood Hazard
�ea, and the Base Flood Elevation (BFE) of the property, as applicable.
L cation, footprint and size of all exisfing and proposed buildings and structures on the site.
� Location and dimensions of vehicular and pedestrian circulation systems, both on-site and off-site, with proposed points
o access.
Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks, curbs, water lines, sanitary sewer lines, storm drains, fire hydrants and
�awalls and any proposed utility easements.
cation of onsite and offsite stormwater management facilities as well as a narrative describing the proposed
stormwater control plan including calculations. Additional data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City of
�earwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manuai may be required at time of building construction permit.
�cation of solid waste collection facilities, required screening and provisions for accessibility for collection.
cation of off-street loading area, if required by Section 3-1406.
� All adjacent right(s)-of-way, with indication of centerline and width, paved width, existing median cuts and intersections
d bus shelters.
�' Dimensions of existing and proposed lot lines, streets, drives, building lines, setbacks, structural overhangs and building
�eparations.
uilding or structure elevation drawings that depict the proposed building height and building materials.
Planning 8 Development Departrnent, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727•562-4865
Page 4 of S Revtsed 01/12
Ca' T pical floor plans, including floor plans for each floor of any parking garage.
�Ll/ D molition plan.
[f�Y Identification and descripfion of watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, specimen trees, and other environmentally
sensifive areas.
.1,k ❑ If a deviation from the parking standards is requested that is greater than 50% (excluding those standards where the
ti� difference between the top and bottom of the range is one parking space), then a parking demand study will need to be
provided. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are
a roved. Please see the adopted Parking Demand Study Guidelines for further information.
lY� A tree survey showing the location, DBH and species of all existing trees with a DBH of four inches or more, and identifying
those trees proposed to be removed, if any.
�l'� ❑ A tree inventory, prepared by a certified arborist, of all trees four inches DBH or more that reflects the size, canopy, and
P co dition of such trees may be required if deemed applicable by staff. Check with staff.
�Y A Traffic Impact Study shall be required for all proposed developments if the total generated net new trips meet one or more
of the following conditions:
■ Proposal is expected to generate 100 or more new trips in any given hour (directional trips, inbound or outbound on the
abutting streets) and/or 1,000 or more new trips per day; or
■ Anticipated new trip generation degrades the level of service as adopted in the City's Comprehensive Plan to
unacceptable levels; or
■ The study area contains a segment of roadway and/or intersection with five reportable accidents within a prior twelve
month period, or the segment and/or intersection exists on the City's annual list of most hazardous locations, provided
by the City of Clearvuater Police Department; or
■ The Traffic Operations Manager or their designee deems it necessary to require such assessment in the plan review
process. Examples include developments that are expected to negatively impact a constrained roadway or developments
with unknown trip generation and/or other unknown factors.
�i A landscape plan shall be provided for any project where there is a new use or a change of use; or an existing use is improved
or remodeled in a value of 2596 or more of the valuation of the principal structure as reflected on the property appraiser's
current records, or if an amendment is required to an existing approved site plan; or a parking lot requires additional
landscaping pursuant to the provisions of Article 3, Division 14. The landscape plan shall include the following information, if
not otherwise required in conjunction with the application for development approval:
❑ location, size, description, specifications and quantities of ali existing and proposed landscape materials, including
botanical and common names.
❑ Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and location, including drip line.
❑ Interior landscape areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressed both in square
feet, exclusive of perimeter landscaped strips, and as a percentage of the paved area coverage of the parking lot and
vehicular use areas.
❑ Location of existing and proposed structures and improvements, including but not limited to sidewalks, walls, fences,
pools, patios, dumpster pads, pad mounted transformers, fire hydrants, overhead obstructions, curbs, water lines,
sanitary sewer lines, storm drains, seawalis, ufility easements, treatment of all ground surfaces, and any other features
that may influence the proposed landscape.
❑ Locafion of parking areas and other vehicular use areas, including parking spaces, circulafion aisles, interior landscape
islands and curbing.
❑ Drainage and retention areas, including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations.
❑ Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscaped buffers including sight triangles, if any.
Planning 8 Development Deparfinent, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727•562-4865
Page 5 of 8 Revised 01/12
LL
o �T���� Planning & Development Department
' 1 � Flexible Development Application
� General Applicability Criteria
PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO EACH OF THE SIX (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA EXPLAINING HOW, IN DETAIL, THE
CRITERION IS BEING COMPLIED WITH PER THIS DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent
properties in which it is located.
SEE EXHIBIT "C"
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings
or significantly impair the value thereof.
SEE EXHIBIT "C"
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood
of the proposed use.
SEE EXHIBIT "C"
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
SEE EXHIBIT "C"
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for
development.
SEE EXHIBIT "C"
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of
operation impacts, on adjatent properties.
SEE EXHIBIT "C^
Planning 8 Development Department,100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865
Page 6 of 8 Revised 01/12
�
� �s
•�, �� �,� �
` �
,, � �
�a ��;�,�'�'9 I
m� .
Planning & Development Department
Flexible Development Application
Flexibilitv Criteria
PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO THE APPLICABLE FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR THE SPECIFIC USE(S) BEING REQUESTED AS SET
FORTH IN THE ZONING DISTRICT(S) IN WHICH THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED. EXPLAIN HOW, IN DETAIL, EACH CRITERION
IS BEING COMPLIED WITH PER THIS DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL (USE SEPARATE SHEETS AS NECESSARY).
SEE EXHIBIT "D"
1.
��
4.
5.
6.
8.
Planning & Development Department,100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865
Page 7 of 8 Revised 01/12
,.
� , ' ,�, �
� ` Plan�ring & i��►el+��m+�n� i�,�paircc�tent
�- � � _ Ft�l�lit� D@V�I(��11��i�t AppifCatlt�X#
w�.. ' . . ... . ' . .. � . .. ... ' ' . .. . . . . .
° Affi�d��t �� ���►c��i��e +�nt 1�+� resentat�ve
2 Prnvide names a€;�It qrcperl.y ow+�er� on deed — I>R�N'� iu�l n���s:
C1eaYqt�tQti M&z3�a9 AquBS''ii�at, isic ,•
2. "tttiat {! am�irve are) the awner�sj and recorc! liCle holder(sj of the'fallov�ingdesc�ibed propert5l:
�49 ti,�mdp+ard Faeaatte, Cleaxwatei. FL 337B7 _ '' '
3. T't�at ifiu pnvp�rt�+ tor�st��tss't#ie'property fotwhitb a r�questi`�i' (de�ribe requcst�:
Add�.t�ioz� tn the .Cleaswtater �easia�e �quasie�m ;s+ee' at�ached E"ishibita i�x det�ai#?u request)'
4. That the ur�dersigned�have} app�int�d �rtd,� a""t�.ta} aPRRir►t;
.SCd*_t �HCCr1811#3'R:lr %.°18�.(�i' S3U'C (i'Z4Up.� %If,C. .. ... .. . . . �.. . .... �� .. .. . . � .�. . .. .
as {hi eir agenys) ta�xearte ar�r petitions arothi�r' dacum�nts �ecessaty ca a�fe�ct such petitioti;
s. Th�t this:afftdavit hds been'Qacecuted ia induce th�e Gity +�f #�e�rwak�r, �lorida ta ronsid�r and ast on the abuve described
P�`��Y`� _
5: That s+ie �isi#s tiq: #t�� Ps'vperty ate nLCessaYl' bY qi�k tt�pt'eS�ht2t�tes in cff'd�r Lo pr(�ess #t�fs appfit�on .and the r�wner
authariae5 �a€ty:representaiiires to visic and photvgraph the prvp�sriy desca•;bed in thts appiiw�ia�; .
7: That (!(w�e], the unrl�rsPgnecl autltor4ty, hereby certify #hat the:.forego�g 3s irue and correct.
��"/�k.� �'E+ �$� Ln�"' �'����".'�-� . x
�C�r �Vf�rf�r PKip�t'fip t�vner
- rapertytavr�tiet P'ropertyQwrter ��—
5'1"ARE U8 �IA&ID1�.��iiiN1"Yl�F F�NEi.1.AS
B��O#�E ME `rl�tE I�IVD�RSIfiNEF3, �Ahl CiFFtCEit �ULY �+�tu1MF sSIL7tdED B'� TH� tAWS 4fi THE STATE OF FkL9RiCiA. ON
THtS �,�� 1 _ L)A`1' t'>� �� ! � , __ , a VJ�_.... �S�+iAL�Y APPEARED
�` 1"�1s�I1 � t..r�'�.• 1MHO FfA�9NG B€EN FiRSi 1JULY SWbRIJ
D�PO �� Y��'".4�" .�,�'�'��� , NDERSTANL�S 7Fi� CC7NT OF THE ;AF'FIDAWIi"1'HA'C tIEIS}#E SIGNEQ.
. � �t► P.uhlie - Sta�a oi Floridi
� � �q1lNqistWn #� F�2310�2
i�t r�ae�r, E�h'a durt t�, 2otp
lOI�MM�M�►�Y�i �M1Pa� , tJakary i'ublic signswre
Notary SeailSl�tt�p, My Gommission Expu€ts: (� °' �� °! �
Rlarming � Qe�telopmer�t Depat^Itnant,li�! S. Myrfle Avenue,.Gteep'1va#etr PL 33T56, Tei: T27-3B2-�t567; Fex: 7'�"fi -562-48B5
Pa�e 8 ot @ Etsviset! DiF12
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOTS 5 THROUGH 8, AND THE WEST 50 FEET
OF LOTS 1 AND 4, BLOCK C, ISLAND ESTATES OF CLEARWATER,
UNIT 5, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF RECORDED
IN PLAT BOOK 51, PAGE 34, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLA5
COUNTY, FLORIDA.
AND
FROM THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF TRACT A OF UNIT 2,
ISLAND ESTATES OF CLEARWATER (PLAT BOOK 47, PAGES 19A
AND 20, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA), RUN N
49°23'41" W, ALONG THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF
CLEARWATER CAUSEWAY, 575.00 FEET FOR A POINT OF
BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE N 49°23'41" W, ALONG SAME LINE,
482.00 FEET; THENCE RUN S 40°36'19" W,147.50 FEET ALONG THE
OUTER FACE OF A SEAWALL; THENCE 94.26 FEET ALONG A CURVE
TO THE LEFT, ALONG SAID FACE, RADIUS 60.00 FEET, INTERNAL
ANGLE 90°00'00"; THENCE S 49°23'41" E, 362.00 FEET ALONG SAID
FACE; THENCE 94.26 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, ALONG
SAID FACE, RADIUS 60.00 FEET, INTERNAL ANGLE 90°00'00";
THENCE N 40°36'19" E,147.50 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
.
�„ � ,
EXHIBIT "B"
TO FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR COMPREHENSIVE INFILL
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
Description of Request:
The subject property is located at 249 Windward Passage, Clearwater, FL. The applicant
proposes Flexible Development approval to permit the expansion of the Clearwater Marine
Aquarium (CMA). The subject property is zoned Commercial (C) District with a Future Land
Use Plan Category of Commercial General (CG).
The proposal is to replace an existing, temporary ticket booth/kiosk and a concession stand/gift
shop/pelican enclosure with permanent, code compliant structures. These existing, temporary
structures were constructed for filming of the movies at the subject site.
The proposed concession/gift shop/pelican enclosure will be approximately 6,650 square feet and
34 feet high (from BFE to top of structure).
The proposed ticket booth will be approximately 150 square feet in area.
Construction of a new ADA accessible ramp is also proposed to allow handicap accessibility to
the second floor.
The subject site was previously approved for an expansion under Case FLD2011-02006. The
previously proposed, approved, improvements have been constructed, with the exception of:
11,000 square feet of new floor area which was to include a lobby, gift shop, outdoor tank
exhibit area with a 660 set outdoor stadium and a 205 space parking garage.
Specifically, this Applicant requests: Flexible Development approval of a Comprehensive
Infill Redevelopment Project to pernut an expansion (6,800 s� in the Commercial (C) District,
consistent with section 2-704(F), specifically including:
a. Lot area of 197,115 sq. ft;
b. Lot width of 546.1 ft.;
c. Building Height of 42.33';
d. Front (north) setback of 14.8ft to pavement, 101 ft to building;
e. Side (east) setback of 10.4ft. to pavement, 282.7 ft. to building;
f. Front (east-waterfront) setback of 0 ft. to pavement and 23.1 ft. to building;
g. Front (south-waterfront) setback of 0 ft to pavement and 11.8ft to building;
h. Front (west-waterfront) setback of 0 ft to pavement, 17.9ft to wall;
i. Side (north) setback of 0 ft to pavement, 30.5 ft to building;
j. Side (west) setback of 0.6 ft pavement, 34 ft to building;
k. 8ft wide interior landscape islands (existing), where 17ft is required;
1. 14 interior landscape trees are provided (existing), where 46 are required;
m. Existing landscape buffers and landscaping (as approved under Case FLD2011-02006);
n. Interior green space (existing) for vehicular use area of 3,910sf (5.6%,)
o. 153 off street parking spaces (149 are required)
p. A two-year development order
EXHIBIT �°C" - GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA (CDC Section 3-914.A):
1) The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density
and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
The Clearwater Marine Aquarium has existed as a marine aquarium and rehabilitation center on this site
since 1978 and the improvements will enhance the customer experience to the CMA and provide
upgrades for the convenience and safety of visitors and staff.
The proposed two-story structure for the concession/retaiUpelican enclosure is an addition to the existing
aquarium facility (will replace the existing temporary buildings). The proposed improvements are
consistent in the aesthetic and massing of the existing structure. The proposed addition will be lower in
elevation than most of the existing adjacent structures and will be consistent in color, graphics and
fenestration of the existing facility. The proposal supports this criterion.
2) The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use
of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof.
The improvements proposed under this application are internal to the site and will not impede the
development or improvement of the surrounding properties. The improvements are internal to the site and
will replace temporary structures. The existing temporary structures will be replaced with code compliant,
permanent structures and will better accommodate existing activities (concessions, gi8 shop and pelican
enclosure). The improvements will enhance the customer experience to the Clearwater Marine Aquarium
and provide upgrades for the convenience and safety of staff and visitors.
The Island Way Grill restaurant is located to the east of the subject parcel.
Marine related businesses are located to the west of the subject parcel.
Retail and attached dwelling residential uses are located to the north across Windward Passage.
The improvements proposed with this application will not impede the development or improvement of
surrounding properties. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with the criterion
3) The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or
working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
The improvements proposed under this application are internal to the site and will have no effect on the
health, safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood. Therefore, the proposal is consistent
with this criterion.
4) The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
The improvements proposed under this application are internal to the site and will not affect the existing
parking areas or drive aisle circulation. A traffic impact study was approved under Case FLD2011-02006
and improvements were constructed pursuant to this application with the exception of the parking garage.
Therefore, this proposal is consistent with the criterion.
5) The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity
of the parcel proposed for development.
The improvements proposed under this application are internal to the site, will not impede the
development or improvement of surrounding properties and is consistent with the character of the
.
� ._ :_
surrounding area. The existing temporary structures will be replaced with code compliant, permanent
structures and will better accommodate existing activities (concessions, gift shop and pelican enclosure).
The improvements will enhance the customer experience to the Clearwater Marine Aquarium and provide
upgrades for the convenience and safety of staff and visitors
The Island Way Grill restaurant is located to the east of the subject parcel.
Marine related businesses are located to the west of the subject parcel.
Retail and attached dwelling residential uses are located to the north across Windward Passage.
The improvements proposed with this application will not impede the development or improvement of
surrounding properties and are consistent in character. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with the
criterion.
6) The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic
and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties.
The Clearwater Marine Aquarium has existed as a marine aquarium and rehabilitation center on this site
since 1978 and the improvements will enhance the customer experience to the CMA and provide
upgrades for the convenience and safety of visitors and staff.
The proposed two-story structure for the concession/retaiUpelican enclosure is an addition to the existing
aquarium facility (will replace the existing temporary buildings). The proposed improvements are
consistent in the aesthetic and massing of the existing structure. The proposed addition will be lower in
elevation than most of the existing adjacent structures and will be consistent in color, graphics and
fenestration of the exisring facility.
Improvements to the dumpster and delivery area as approved under Case FLD2011-02006 have been
constructed.
The proposal supports this criterion.
x ;
� .y
,
ic� ____ _
EXHIBIT "D"
COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA (CDC Section
2-704.F):
1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use
and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district.
The improvements proposed under this application do not require any additional deviations from the use
or development standards of the Commercial (C) District. Improvements approved under Case FLD2011-
02006 were reviewed and found to be in compliance with code standards and criteria at that time.
Therefore, the proposal is consistent with the criterion.
2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the
Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of
this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district.
The improvements proposed under this application are consistent with the goals and policies of the
Comprehensive Plan, specifically Goals A.3, A.5 and A.6 and Policies A.3.2.1 and A.5.1.2., as well as
with the general purpose of Section 1.103 of the Community Development Code (CDC), and with the
intent and purpose in Section 2.701 of the Commercial (C) District. Therefore, the proposal is consistent
with this criterion.
3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and
improvement of surrounding properties.
The improvements proposed under this application are internal to the site and will not impede the
development or improvement of surrounding properties. The existing temporary structures will be
replaced with code compliant, permanent structures and will better accommodate existing activities
(concessions, gift shop and pelican enclosure). The improvements will enhance the customer experience
to the Clearwater Marine Aquarium and provide upgrades for the convenience and safety of staff and
visitors.
The Island Way Grill restaurant is located to the east of the subject parcel.
Marine related businesses are located to the west of the subject parcel.
Retail and attached dwelling residential uses are located to the north across Windward Passage.
The improvements proposed with this application will not impede the development or improvement of
surrounding properties. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with the criterion.
4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed
development.
The improvements proposed under this application are internal to the site and will not impede the
development or improvement of surrounding properties. The existing temporary structures will be
replaced with code compliant, permanent sh-uctures and will better accommodate existing activities
(concessions, gift shop and pelican enclosure). The improvements will enhance the customer experience
to the Clearwater Marine Aquarium and provide upgrades for the convenience and safety of staff and
visitors.
a� ..� _._. . � __- __ #k � _ .. ,_— .. �. .. . .. ___.�. �_-.. � -__. _ . ... .. . . .. � . . � . . . . .
5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be
compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of
the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following
obj ectives:
a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, fle�ble
standard or flea�ible development use;
b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by
diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs;
c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing
economic contributor;
d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing;
e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized
by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would
result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or
f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new, and/or preservation of a working
waterfront use.
Pursuant to the uses set forth in the Commercial (C) District, an Indoor Recreation/Entertainment use is
listed as a Minimum Standard, Flexible Standard and Flexible Development Use. The Clearwater Marine
Aquarium is recognized as a significant economic contributor to the City through the community work
and education it does and the impact of tourists coming to the attraction as a result of the movies.
The improvements will enhance the customer experience to the Clearwater Marine Aquarium and provide
upgrades for the.convenience and safety of staff and visitors.
This proposal does not provide affordable housing. The subject property is Zoned Commercial (C)
District, which permits the Indoor Recreation/Entertainment use, which does not require a land use plan
amendment or rezoning.
The proposed improvements also includes eliminating and combining slips in the city marina along the
Mandalay Channel resulting in a total of 28 boat slips to remain.
6. Flea�ibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height, and off- street parking are
justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives:
a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and
improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district.
b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City.
c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or
emerging character of an area;
d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed
development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements:
• Changes in horizontal building planes;
• Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos,
balconies, railings, awnings, etc.;
• Variety in materials, colors and textures;
• Distinctive fenestration patterns;
• Building stepbacks; and
• Distinctive roofs forms.
e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and
appropriate distances between buildings.
The improvements proposed under this application are internal to the site and will not impede
development on surrounding properties.
There are no specific design guidelines adopted by the City affecting this property.
The Clearwater Marine Aquarium has existed as a marine aquarium and rehabilitation center on this site
since 1978 and the improvements will enhance the customer experience to the CMA and provide
upgrades for the convenience and safety of visitors and staff.
The proposed concession/retail/pelican enclosure building will have distinct architectural features (arched
roo fl.
Buffers and landscape design that was previously approved under Case FLD20 1 1-02006 were constructed
and no changes are being proposed in that regard.
� �f �-
�.
. ;<� �� �,� ���:� � .
�� ��� � ��'� I
_ , �. � �.._
Planning & Development Department
Comprehensive Landscaping Application
IT IS INCUMBENT UPON THE APPLICANT TO SUBMIT COMPLETE AND CORRECT INFORMATION. ANY MISLEADING, DECEPTIVE,
INCOMPLETE OR INCORRECT INFORMATION MAY INVALIDATE YOUR APPLICATION.
ALL APPLICATIONS ARE TO BE FILLED OUT COMPLETELY AND CORRECTLY, AND SUBMITTED IN PERSON {NO FAX OR DELIVERIES)
TO THE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY NOON ON THE SCHEDULED DEADLINE DATE.
A TOTAL OF 11 COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS AND APPLICATION MATERIALS (1 ORIGINAL AND 10 COPIES) AS REQUIRED WITHIN
ARE TO BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW BY THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE. SUBSEQUENT SUBMITTAL FOR THE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD, IF NECESSARY, WILL REQUIRE 15 COMPLETE SETS OF PIANS AND APPLICATION
MATERIALS (1 ORIGINAL AND 14 COPIES). PLANS AND APPLICATIONS ARE REQUIRED TO BE COLLATED, STAPLED AND FOLDED
INTO SETS. '
THE APPLICANT, BY FILING THIS APPLICATION, AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF THE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE.
PROPERTY OWNER (PER DEED): Clearwater Marine Aquarium, Inc.
MAILING ADDRESS: 249 Windward Passage, Clearwater FL 33767
PHONE NUMBER: (727)953-8662
EMAIL: fdame(a�cmaqurium.org
AGENT OR REPRESENTATIVE: Scott McClelland, Inside Out Group, Inc.
MAILING ADDRESS: 812 Louden Ave, Dunedin, FL 34698
PHONE NUMBER: ('72��'734-36'73)
EMAII: smcclelland(a�,iog-ioc.com
ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: 249 Windward Passage, Clearwater, FL 33767
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: SEE EXHIBIT "B"
Speciffcally idenhfy the request
(include a!! requested code flexibility,•
e.g., reduction in required number of
parking spaces, height, setbacks, !ot
size, lot width, specific use, etc.J:
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS �}
i, the undersigned, acknowledge that all Swo to and subscribed before me this C7� day of
representations made in this application are true and �..-
accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize �...�:_• to me and/or by
City representatives to visit and photograph the who is personally known has
property de,scri{72 — ' lication. �
�- f produced i' as identification.
of �operty owner or representative `I�ary pubfic, 1
/
My commission expires:
Plan�ing 8 Development Departrnent, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865
Page 1 of 2 EI.tZABETH DUGAS Revised 07/12
Notary Public, State of Flaida
My Comm. Expires Mey 20, 2016
No. EE 200102
LL
o ����� Planning & Development Department
' Comprehensive Landscaping Application
� Flexibility Criteria
PROVIDE COMPLETE RESP�NSES TO EACH OF THE FIVE (5) FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA EXPLAINING HOW, IN DETAII, THE CRITERION
IS BEING COMPLIED WITH PER THIS COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPING PROPOSAL
1. Architectural Theme:
a. The landscaping in a Comprehensive Landscaping program shall be designed as a part of the architectural theme of the
principai buildings proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for the development.
See below item b.
OR
b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscaping
program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for
development under the minimum landscape standards.
Existing landscaping on the site was approved by FLD2011-02006. There is no additional landscaping proposed as part of this
application.
2. Lighting. Any lighting proposed as a part of a Comprehensive Landscaping program is automatically controlled so that the
lighting is turned off when the business is closed.
Proposed accent lighting will be exterior mounted to the proposed structure and will complement the facility by
providing ambient light.
3. Community Character. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will enhance the
communiry charecter of the City of Clearwater.
The landscapin� provides aestheticallv pleasin� views and utilizes plant material which are conducive to the
commercial environment.
4. Property Values. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscaping program will have a beneficial impact
on the value of the property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The existing landscaping is consistent with the general theme of the area and will have a positive
and beneficial impact on the surrounding properties.
5. Special Area or Scenic Corridor Plan. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program is
consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Cleanrvater has prepared and adopted for the area in
which the parcel proposed for development is located.
This site is not part of a"special area or scenic corridor" however it is appmpriate for this commercial area.
Planning 8 Development Department,100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 72T-562-4567; Fax: 727•562-4865
Page 2 of 2 Revised 01/12
DEUEL & ASSOCIATES
CONSULTING ENGINEERS * LAND SURVEYORS * LAND PLANNERS
565 S. Hercules Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33764
Office (727) 822-4151 Fa1c (727) 821-7255
August 5, 2015
Mr. Mathew Jackson, Planner III
City of Clearwater
Planning & Development Department
P.O. Box 4748
Clearwater, FL 33758
(727) 562-4567
Re: Application Number:
Project Name:
Address:
Project Location:
FLD2015-06023
Clearwater Marine Aquarium Improvements
249 Windward Passage
Clearwater, FL
Dear Mr. Jackson,
In response to the Letter of Incompleteness received on 8/3/2015, I am providing the below responses along
with the revised DRC submittal package:
The survey needs to be signed and sealed.
Response: The survey is now signed/sealed.
On the site plan, provide the typical dimensions of the drive aisle widths and parking stalls
including handicapped for the vehicular use area on the east side of the site.
Response: Dimensions are now shown on the site plan.
3. Provide the location of onsite and offsite stormwater management facilities as well as a narrative
describing the proposed stormwater control plan including calculations. It is understood that
stormwater management was addressed in the previous approval and please check with our
stormwater department on if you can provide an update to the previously approved stormwater
information.
Response: A stormwater narrative is now included in the submittal package.
4. Provide the required screening of the solid waste collection facility. It is understood that the
screening exists so photographic evidence with dimensions will sufiice.
Response: The dumpsters are fully enclosed/screened. Pictures are included in the submittal
package. Dimensions are shown on the site plan.
Provide the dimension from all property lines to the closest building. This is required for the case
description.
Response: Dimensions from all property lines to the closest building are shown.
6. On all building elevations, clearly show the dimension from base flood elevation to the top of flat
roof or midpoint of pitched roof.
Response: Dimensions are now shown on the architectural plans.
7. Provide the updated traffic impact study. Most recently Robert Pergolizzi prepared an updated study
per direction from Paul Bertels.
Response: Updated TIS is included in the submittal package.
Provide a landscape plan meeting the application requirements as well as a comprehensive landscape
program application that addresses the revised Landscape Code requirements.
Response: a landscape plan and comprehensive landscape application is included in the submittal
package.
Provide one updated PDF to include the entire revised application and plans to either Sherry Watkins or
Matt Jackson no later than noon on 08.11.15.
Response: See attached.
If you have any questions regarding the above or have further comments, please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
.,�r���
Brian Barker, PE
Principal
STORMWATER NARRATIVE
249 WINDWARD PASSAGE
CLEARWATER MARINE AQUARIUM
A stormwater treatment system (vault) was designed and permitted by others under FLD 2011-
02006.
The vault was constructed under the e�sting east parking lot.
The proposed improvements are being constructed over impervious surface which was accounted
for previously in the stormwater calculations (by others).
A copy of the stormwater calcuations and narrative for FLD 2011-02006 (by others) is attached
to this narrative.
��
� FLD2015-06023
�s
_ � �r
Plan_4
��or� FL� �d1j - D,� pD�'
'T�� pr�pt���� car�st��c�iar� �.�cti�itie� ��n��s� c��'�:� f��l��ir�g:
249 Windward Passage
+ �Gan�trucii�i� ��' �8,� 14 �.F. c��' ��c�� ��=t���i��x� ��hi����r r���, �=�iieh
ic��lud�s thc parkin� l�t, ����n� �ar��e �ri+� sid��� t� �����,
� �c���tr��tic��� �-�' ar� und�r�x�s�nd v�c�lt i� pr�prss�d tc� �rovic�e �rater
�uali��> tr���irze�fi f�r � ���i`uni� ��u�I :�� ��'.�" �f a��n�f�' t�v��r �a� ���i;r�
dr�inag� b��� �r�.
� Tr��tt���nt c�f ���°����r r�ill l�� ���i�v�� thrQU�h an ��"�u��t
ur���rd�in �y�t�m i;�t�gr�l'ta the va�Ct. _
�► �+ir� :�c��;ana1 Hi�;h ��t�r`���v�t��r� ����r�u�a�i+�� c�r F�r��iiat��n T�st
�h�;ll be r�uir�d, ��� tl�� v�.:�l� �nci ur�de��i� ��st.�.� �r� s�lf
�on�in�d:. I'�c� �rt��d ��.��r ir�ir��iau :intt� �i� syst�� ���t] c�e�r, and
t��er�f�re v,�i:11 �a�re n� �ff'��;t �n t��� fi�t�+�tit���li� �� t�Z� s��trn��a��i�
�ysie� ii��if:
�► T�� o��r�i��w ��c�ill �� p�ped c�i.r�ctl}� in#�s ����a����r I=��r%��, "Tla�r�f�r�
��� att�nc��tion �fr�l] �i� r�quire�i..
+ "�h� t���in�g�- C`a��ul.ati�an� t�.acre b��n pr�p���� �� �c�c��+��n�e �i.th t�c
Ciiy c�;� �'3e�,�u�ter l�r�i�a�;;� 11�af��al �.i��i �'h� :�c���thwesi' Fiotai�a.
tVtaraa��ment �istri��ta
.
�
�'�� p��rject is �c�e�.t�d in au� �g�1�r b�sii�.
?tic� i�i��l��+� i���i�ets �,r��l� z�s�lt �'r�an �o�si:ru�����: af t�i� �rt�j�c��:
i___.. __ .. . . . .
06.12.2015
. ,,_< ,w.,,..,..;...,___.,..�;..��.___.�.��.,.�,,,�,..�,�,..«..w�
_'_ � � �.___ _... _-. _. .. ___ .� ._..... .. -_. lk�_-___ _.. � __...�
. FL02015-06023
37
Plan_4
i���}a�c't`,�i4�wE: ��.����T�� �i��l���i+� .
����t���t t��a, ; �o��
�����it��. �t�N�� , �i .
���-�� �i���� ��t�t�-= ���€�� s� = 2:�� ����s
�2Vf�s�:!^M'S�t'1*: ..... i.! �[� '°� Ur��:�L'ti�.R.C�.
���c� ����- � s� � �r;aa ���z�s
P�F�4�. Ai�EA= �B,t3�3 SF = 2.��!i4�RES
G !CAL�U _Ti£�t�.
T�77`AL it#�Athlt���,�F���:- . 95,��3 �F
�r�.n�. ����,= c� s� o� i�n�. �:���a � � �
����a ���a- a �� Q� �c��va �� � c; -
���v ���;�-= ss,r�� s� a� p���: �� � e:-
� .� �.�c�
�-.�.c. = �� n���u��s
�R��c�s�� �ar��irricr��
�r�-���. c������� �a��- ��F�s�� �� � �.�� ac���
ft�iF?, ;4��A=� i�t��9� �� — 9.i�1 ;A�Fi�S
PflltiD AR�A-: a.� �F — �i.tiU 'A,C#2£S�
�EFt:V. ARt�A= 1�,239 �� — t}.44 A�R�S
� �ALCUt,ATIt��ES
TbT`A� q�3AENAG� ftf��A= 9�$,ti�3 5F
Is'�P. #�R�+= 78,�'t� S� t� tMP. �iR�A f� �-
P�3�7[3 .AF�E�iw C1 SF O� PE?ivi� iQ�EA (� �=
���v. ���a� ��,��� s� a�'����: �t�� � e =
� w �.�n
i,C�,C, = '15 1VilP�Jl1�`ES
—_ _ _ _ �t
.s
243 Windward Passage
����
�.
�:�
Ciz�a
'!
�.�
06.12.2015
`' FLD2015-06023
p�U�J��T N�l1��` :
PF�t�,iECT Nt?. :
Plan 4
�L�AR#�iA�`�R .�4�U���C�.
'! Ci3'1
��7N[�"�v �T�iC� ��l {��C�� ��TA •
T'.�1.8; �L..=
C�.I�.�t1I. �a EN�..-
VV,i�: EL:-
B'C�TT!QM EL.=
249 Windward Passage
fif�T��. WAT�R Qt1:Al..li'� CAL�LxI.�T1C?t�S:.
DR�Ati�;�C� A�fA -
R��u��.�� ���r��;r����,t�r�r ���r� .=
��QUt��Q w�T�� c�u�t���r�r �Q�.u�� �
P�C�P+�SEC� �t,iT�AL.L EL:�1�A7tCtl�+t =
,�'�AI���i.E IN�1T�� QU�IL.IT'Y =
38
98,O:i3 5�'
�.�� ��r
�3��s ��
�,��" �T
6�1�'I GF
06.12.2015
_
� .
— __ —_
_ _ -
.. . _. . . �- . _. . g -_ _... .
' F1D2015-06023
` 1�C}RiFI�IDE ��iE�3ii�i�EF�Itd.tG �E#tViG�S''
_
25'YE�IR �TO�11� ���Ci'
PfiC�,#��T: �L�A�.�ftA7'�R AWUAi�l��A
1�RC1.#�;GT'hif7: 'I U�i
RU�J-d�� C{3��Fi!Ci�;�fi5
- PFf�-Gt}ist3'TFtUaC't'Ii1N
i`�7TA� i#E2Xl#�tAC�E AF2�R=
IAAP. �l�E#n=
Pf�t'�I[3 A3��A=.
PER�. ,4REA.-
=' s � �:2,i1
f�C'3�i�4�iV S`�E�t1 C"t'It�}!�
`ft)i`A�.i�FZ±�It�I�t3`E I�R��'t=
Itvi'�. A�= . _
P{3�tt� Al��=
PEf�V. AR��»
� = CI.Bt�
ST G� G�k � L�4Ttt��!
� R E-t� K��1 STi�UCT i�P1
I�i2A.IN�IG� �f2� _
T(l4+1� {iF GC31rfC; T� �
i �? i`� =1a {'�;£ `Y��F� ��t�:�t't�=.
t����ta r t�'. x��c A;=
PC15T
�lFi ESt��i.
39
Plan_4
�S,tJ�r3 vK .�.�5<A�
� s� o� rn��� �+���, � � _
9 � � Q� �'t�Nt3 t��;� � G� �
�8,�53 SF C�� PER1l. RR�� � � _
�.t��� �F 2.�5 �
78:$t# SF f3� MMP. �4#��� � .0 =
{} s�F C�F PGsti1L� A� � �. �
i:fl,��8 �� pF F�R�7. x4F2E�'t � :� =
�;25 +��
"!� t«1IlF�!
":�#i� thitFtR
�:� !C��
•r��. c�� v� ��z �� �v.=
�c��r. c�� w�r� �i.��.-
Fi =
��
C:-t�t3;1'.`F�i"'1.5;=-
,.
-- ;� �
�,�sa �r
;3 �7 `FT
t?:13' �T
i3 ?7 ���
�.�5 FT:ftuT�f4tj 1�5� 1f3 F7'
249 Windward Passage
r�:��.
1
0:�
t6
06.12.2015
♦a
': FLD2015-06023
PFtt3JEC:7:
�'Rt�.JECT N{�..
Pian_4
ht47�'i'!#S1t��':��iC'ii��1N+�a a����[���;
P+C�iC? i%RA��YCJWN At��1l,.'Y�1�
CLEARWA'1'�R Asl�lARiiJM
9Q39
VC3il7ME.FR�'ti!1�?ELI.� �,��°+ C.�:
Bt�`1"ft�C�f t�F �LLt`€" EL�it. a �:d'ar
F3bTTC){�R'tZ�'Pt�t�ti� ELE1�:'= �e7�e
UhEfl�RC1i�A3t+f #NtIERT ��;.�V: = �t."��
Ct7�F�1�lEN'f �i� PE�1�A��E.1t3' �i� = Q.Q'� �`f�I4tlf5�:
�.�N61'Fi C?F {;lt1DER�iF41�9N ?� £�� F'7
51�� QF UNiiERl7FtAl�1- 6 it<1�H
P.OtdD Ait�"{�i?'� �
P�t� 1�t2�A ���� �
249 Windward Passage
� �°t3 S,F.
�,7�'5.�:
7C7TAit1RAYVQ�W�L1/t7'l:�iAj�� �K1�1 �,�.
TOTAi. FJRA1i§t#3(7YYN TIME`� 23:5 F�OI:JFtS
40
S
�' -- - _ _ _ .
06.12.2015
_ �
� FLD2015-06023
41
Plan_4
249 Windward Passage
CI.��A�'�' 'I'�'' �. I1�i.�l�I�F 1�. �.��tti�l4�
"�'� T ���.',t�N�� �.I���TL:�TI��
'��T�UMi� (�� i�` L� T . t� �:�, � #�:� "'�A�"C�R E ��r�lTZE3?�
lnsit��,L}irn��io�3s �f Vaul� �A�� x ��' i�
b��� caf i��c�it - 4,ti (���� -� t3.S� Cbc�ttna� �te��ati�rt,} ��.5 i�
''�c�[�r��� �� l�i�pls���rierit = �4� ;x �4�� � 3:S' == t �,?�t? c�'
L�PI.T�T C)�z �T�iiL,T �3ELC�'��:�I�� �i,�.='l �,23t� c��. 62;� 11a�1�f'� ���;a�?" ibs.
i��TE: s��c��al hi�h vwat�r �tev�ti�tt ass�t�cci tc� �� l 2 ir�cl��� b�tcr� e�i�-trirag �;r�v.r��.
Vii�I�'r�I'T t�F Ti�i� �,,,,�1;L1I.'T`
Vvrc'i�h t�f""th� i�Va�is =(��8 If x�;67'� 4'� x tS0 ltr'sl�f = 143;i� ��trs
t�'ei�l�t dt'"I`�r�i �cf �3c���tr� Slabs =(C��' � 4S' x(l.d"i').� ��� lbsl�fj x�= 759,7#�t� lta�
1"�J�"Ai. '�`EIC,r��' �'J�' '�1�.UL'1" = 1.�}�%716 �b;� �- 759s7$#� �bs = $��,4��i lbs,
825;�52 ibs � 8�,�9�fi 16s ,�
_. __ _ .�t _ _ - i� >
06.12.2015
i ; :,� t51i�i �
�*�- s°�..�
�.:����I� ���� ����`'�; �����' ����`'�`C��'���� ���.
� � �` � , � �, � � �t �t. ,�� +� �.,
N�t�orta,E i`i��! Epo�ch ��B3=2o�i
i`rs=s s, e prw�.ni��� u�lat S�r.ur ��a:��� �n �rie �a.:rs•eit�
�".li:H;;�t iCf t�SCi'Y�$RC° AIL: �'8 7:a`itDt?$4 a�3:?L"7s1]3-�RC4
�rcsc�cl�ires �3ta�trsF�r3 by tr� %�a�i�eri�1 Dcean
�e.^�iw�:
Re;�ic: Ai�r`e ��csut NTt'?� �3-�1:
� ?+�aa� :L�+trs. .... i�_.„,°��
A+la��i La�/�`rs
�.��".";� �;— ; �-������� z�-���:
��-� �t�: r����, H��n wa�� ���
<::�� �,``�,�,' L:�r�rsi rsf� �tation Ls7c�riair,
u 5�icw i:�i§e':�
�;.,�: � T�de Ir�erRtst�t�ei� Poia�
`( sh4w iaae�s "
�'. i`�`,: �r��e+r. t��a� une'�
� „Sh�vr:cah�s
F�t�L?+��3 ��Ut=ek�' �I�."`E,e',' :�{'�s� �'
,. ?i`etimiz�rd N� �'
I��'�� � r'�' 6�rz�;ghic,Eicauntic'�r�c�s .
� AUkvmatiealt� ��ir�sfi hfi��i
0
rn
N
N
O
CT1
_ _ __... .. . _
�'��� � D� �
.�. _
�t��F'
�ci€r��tt �f Strrve� anri f��PPa�S
l.�r�t! 8c�tsrsdary I�f�rmaifart 5yst$m.
i
�ii�.=l��ta.�a.b�as.c�c�1�3!I�?E'f IVvir��ty��2.js�x
1:��7 �24}I l
' 1.�11�3.I�TS -:�t,�s�.����: ��'���a £�t��� .
. FLD2015-06023
� ' Plan_4 ;
����.�:�:� , ,
i�.@Sk���lS i1� iai��! ��Y!F:C� � �
'f7'tE� ��eiy ����+t�'C� �x�r��E�,Es�y�:t'�;
�v��1 thc��� no� t�urn�tt `�t�;
�o�rci�na�e Pasi�ion
�X!#i�r� �'�a�#� ►�fairkt#,'�3r N(l.�: 5'1�3'��t7;.��Q7:59
S�te f�l�Ett� Nt►►tt( (?CrYr'83� Pt.j; �S{)8�22J . '
_ 3:58�t8'
'��a�e !?'fi��8 E�"st �"X,.1;`f33i �t»): E�Gi?33,' �;��#94
�z€�rie S?y
+�`i�il�@ i�f8f].�' {�V�+ist ��y'1(r`9�r l�k.�. �8�2.;
_ _ l���C�
f�:�,r�� #:i�.
Gie�gr�ptrFc (riIi4D83�= �3�� �9` �:3" V4f
28" t}' 1�}" (�.
1J`7i+�: 3�2LlZt}6, 34}9$3fi5
.�ze�:�e �7�,
�ase Informat�un
Gi�u�rt�rc Pit�ellas
t��a�ci IYamst [>t,€hl�C}Tfit>
(,�u�i►ter-If�teatis r1�:
T�d� �nkerp�iatiain A�fnts
i#iian 1t7�3t1�7
i�iTpi:83•t1�.
l�li4� ��8
hiiethnd
S1tatSora -3
Sta'i��7r x
Mea� i�fgh Vvat�r �}.�7 �'
Nlr�an La� �Nat�r . °�.71 f�
�e�attn�fl Eilgh Wafer
i7�trv�itUt�aci A�ii��-rz�r'�l �c�riii
If yUU ttp t7ot S(;e Che Ef�td;
enac y�u ���e�d, r��
zacsrx�Ing iri �eCQS�r:
_... �.�C�Ci �tlii�3y�t i .���5�l:1`�s��?S��'xP�tc:tr.�::_::..: ._...
���� � .fS� .�
249 Windward PassagQ
43 06.12.2015
�l.i�� IGl<i!4 i�t�a��e��r{=�.i�z��3,1�i:tt�i�,��;°�xt�`i����'35::)ri�l3'i.�c�t�t�������It.1;��e�-s.f�����1'-==:Sl�`)��:)::�'�C;.�:st;;��-�;�c�r�;��iW_.�i�l�f,.. �.,i.s`�r;i�
� __ .
_ _ -- - __
- ---- _
- — _ ---- �_
���.;��?N�S -� � c,�i�l.t�; caf t�1.a�� �u�r�
�. FLD2015-06023
Plan_4
� 1'�.g�s ,t ci�' l
249 Windward Passage
���.�i��.
���u��� cr� ���a �u�ery.
��� �u�ry r��rs � �it,��y��, ,�:=
��:er+ tPr+� n�i tktt`n�l tan:
Ca;ordiiz�C� P��itian
i4;1�qr� ���st,, t�lortit,'8�,: �1t.�: �'��8�'�{ +�32��
St�te'Pla�t� �lurth �X�4",'83, 1�:): 25Q73�39;. - � �
_ 3f�3�i3
State Pl�rtse �ast-E7"4Y,'S�, �t);: G�6�5, 33�3�21.
(�nr� �.7�
'.�dC�Bt t''ts�:lt+e LA►�HC. ��r'!'r'��r ��)': 3.$�3�'��r
133�105
� {'zcsne ii); .
��sgr�p�i� (�%t[Y83}: 62° �#9' �'i" ��
�7" 59' �S" Pf
Ui't?; ��iiQ�9, 3('i�✓4$1
(zr�n�. :�7�
���t itfform�'�ign
Cour�t'y'; #tt�eli�s
Quad �am�. �L�ARit�A't'�R
Q.[tark�r-Quads t�W
i`ide Interpota�n Pbintass
ltietii :�;(�p�9�
1VTti�B�•t11
l�t�1VL3 88
FI:�Yitod" _ _ _
Sta#io:n i
Stattibn �
_ .
Meat� Hl�h 'i�I�t�r, �7.�6 ft
M�an L�rw Watec , -z>�� f�
Seasonal #�igh. iN'�tar
C�i�al+:�rc� ���Zrc��al ��riva
IP you dc� nr�t s��s ttre data
Y#��t �c,ta �x��cked, tl=y `
xc,rx�ni�� in �i��r:
... L�p)d �c��??4�ilC�.��4.�t�t%tan.�s��[..w..,..,:...�
44 06.12 2015
tt�nrtt��<�t����at���r�rs7,i���t��fifi[��� i�'��i`t�����T'�r�f�ti�t��fi;ii�-�'�I�.�Itl..;:�r rs.�;>�7a'x;l =:+!-�?3s�`�;�t5rte�2{�l.�ii�;�,.!���4-���.+... �..�=3t�s�a.i
_ __
---= _ =--
�
1_..�1�I.�� m �e��.tt�s �C`iV1�p �?c���y Plan_4 ,� �'��� � ��� �.
• FLD2015-06023 249 Windward Passage
C,. ,AE k! � � � .
R�.'��a�tS 6►� T+Ia�.Q�a�t�+!; � �
1`ht���uu.�o'� r����rts f�ar �(i t��l��,
�vc.�x'C�z34e i�C?� Eiar7��*ci bn.:
�varil4n�at� P�►sitit�n
����'�7. �"���6f ��i'il7ifA���� �*#Ct�i ���41t1y %��Sd �V.
��i�'Yi�Ti�. JlV�l7.'�iL��g'���� ���:: �J)e�:���y-.fry'���j..1�.••: .
� , ._ .. . ... �J�L7G�i��. �
�taite f�iar�� 8a��:�SGiY,'��J &t:3, 64951, i3�8��1
(�one 1 �}
��it� �1�i1t�'iA�e�t (X,'Yr��i, �k;): 3�78U�;
_
_ _ 132$2��;
(zcsr�se �2)
i��ograp�►ic �N�crri�3): ��� 4�r s3^ i+v
Z%°'`J�� 3�� JV
UTIMs 334#��i1, 3095�6ii ,
{YC�rie �7j
��is�':�infctrn�atisstr
�+su�ty: F[r�ellas
t�usitl N�rri�: Ct.EAR.V�IfiTfFt
K�it�►`��-C�uat#• NVd
�ei�t�r! "C�r�� ���I�n ILn�atG�tt
i�t. 872-:.b�a�
{.+ist1l#�3+;:
Qti#AK� NRI�i+�:.
i3�P Meth,od: � ��ar �EP E�e t1n1�+;#
Tict�t Benctr�aark �'rar� g7;�4 {PH� fc�t•rriat�
[3�P;
StatuSi•
I�ubtEsts�f it��ork l�a'ke;
L�ki'�ti�te (17+�C Y7�eq�:
Lort�1"rty�d� (l�ec D�g'}t
�pOCtt
Tistal �pac.h.o �'���-2t�t#�i
NAYL1';88
�a�n Hl�h t�7ater:; 0.5J tt
Nle�rr L�w 1Nater: `-1.28 �i
C.�r�cvr�t�ad A{���r.1�i �rrir4 °
if y�u -dcs neat see tfi� ��ta
that y�aa c�a�p.�.t�d, tt'y:
z��aatrsg [�s,�zss�r:
: _��� �'�!!±��rY.,�����.r#t'�.�4?R,����p�:.._......._
45 06.12.2015
�#.,ry.;�'�:��x�.l��i��_�n��:�/iz��1:�;�'�\�ii��w'��1t�t.g;�x:E�7�zif�S�ler��if��h��.�ktCsa�tes�s:i���?x;l��l�7f:�,f`'2(i'2�31i`�f�°'�:�.�.��:��'t,,. t.:�t.'�:��1.
�.,�:�3i�� - l��sultis c�f' M�p �iu�ry
.. FLD2015-Ofi023'
{� Plan_4 I�
C (� � � �,:� .
�E."�'rl�€tS O� N��i� ���.°�f
F9�f� �t��ry ��r`k� �z�r�-�t( k����
c�r� ���e� a�� tts��r�c� �?�.
�CcsardEnat.� 1POSl�t►n;
�hibers (Pasfi� hlerrth,t83� :NF�.�: 59:539�, �4A�2f 7
��$�a$ �N�.�� �'�f` f"�fi �.i�}��j���r' f%':�: ��J�:.�.��.Y#: .• .
.. . . �. � ��.��.�� ..
+74�4�. P'i4�i��ii'� �^$.TL'���yT��iPdMiy i-i.a�i :SSYlJ9{Ij':;L_]4.�1��'_�
��`�JitC« � ii
�"sE�tte Ftarte �!i%est (�t`;fit,"8:�, Ft,�:' `3Lt�',��t3,
;132C�"��
���rre z7j
�eogr�pFs�c {C+EAI�S�.y: �2° ��.' �9" iN
��° 5i' �8" �tV
#1T'�!: 3�t��1tl, �t)�$�1�'�
{�i�n� 1;'j
B�a�o.i�f��•m�tion'
G�uirttY> FinelP��
(�u�# 1'��itt�: C[:�iAittNA7'��
t2u�rter�-c�►u�st; tdt�
Ttst�t[��NipRR�r�ge-�+�c#p�: 2�' 15� 27
Tide Tnierpolatio� i��ints .
Iti�tt ti1�:
1!!�'D���^��
1tifAli�3 H8<
E�l+�thod
5�atixtt7i 1 6704�i
,rxtatior► .� _
Mean kiigi�t tNater q.651i
Ma�an L�w ifYarter -i���: fY
5ed�unai tfigh 1N��er
t?�wr,lc�� �p�st-�av�i �'=af=1t�
I� yc�y da �c�t see tFre,,ctat�
fl�a! yc)u e���t�i, Xt�+
�€st�rrting tn elas�t;
, �!��..���+�a��%Y ��R��1'Itlt#��'i:.S���'��L...,..... � ,.
�
2491Nndward Passage ��`�� � �� �'
�
4fi 06.12.2015
7�ct7.i.?f.�cig:l,�ii�)1i15.{97�i.flialt.��„�?1?���'r'v`:�:'�ti�tii.t7i���1iz���C''(i�t�:�4'�s'il.l.ii.�.::`e��fL;t`i.,t.�.'�k°`.��-„".�e�'�:i "�3�i}:S�}'Sq���_t`4�`:':�===�^�i�... i.��:,f.'�.)i.�.
.� � � :
. � — - _. — s
__ _
' L,�}3i1'��; - I�esulls e��1�1.��p t,�u�ar�
FLD2015-06023
Plan_4
� � � �. :r��' �
249 V�ndward Passage �
t.���.I`si.� _ .__
R�sur�s crf #�a�s �t2ue�r�r
'Ft��� qc�r�t r��3rt� ��r° �ti i�y�rs; ��
�+�ers �h��. nat t��rti�ri c�ra;
�bOft�(t1A�`B l�YISr��iOt9'
AF�3er3 (�a3st�. Nt3F�hr'$3f i"!�.). 5171�� 9��93fri
Siate P�a�� i��rti� {�,Y�'f33r �j; i��;557q>. - ,
3i�Of�3
SC�tt�•F*ia�te�e E��t'(3t,,Yj'83i ��,�,: ���i��; �.3�OG#r
j�ctr�� z��
Stalte F>l�� �'�s� �iCb'�`f`8�� Ft;); 3�}�f3�;
��1���9
. �zrrti� .1'?}
G�qg,rap�t�e f�i?83�t €33° �B':�±�#" to,i
� i'� �7` �'�3" &+I
UTht: �2���4.:�G�3��7
(��?it� z i�
'E��i4e Inf�i�t»�ttotti �
�'�u�tY: pin�lias
: �ltead iSC�t�es GL�i4t24ti�TE�
�tuart�wit��aatia: ��,
'#`s�rwrtst�l�t�;ara��e�:�f�.ian: �9� 1�E: ��i
�ai�i�nal Gecrd�tic �urrrey (I+��S�
PI�f ,QGt}9��3
: 5t'�rt'�pin�:;
IE�es�g�attane
�a�trsai Tit� St.�tFt�n Lo�Y�e�n
��� k37�� E7�}fs'
�iourstyx
t�Ytact Nam�s
��P Nlatha�d: ;x .��c,r ;t��P i3se t3n1Y?
Tic{at �3�nach�fit�tk f�om �;7i3t�i {P�� Pnarnat)
DEFs
�Y��ilS.
Ptf�F�t�h@d itL.�t3t't 1i'ax8:
L��i��td� {i�+�c �gj, .
L:ari+9i�uzi�t (L3ec Deg}:
�pr�eh
Tidet �p�±�h: �98���qti:t ,
NAYC3 88:
Nl�an Mig�h tiNatet: 0;�4 ft
lNe��a Lotrv'Y4!!a�tBr: -i..25 FE
C?rr.��r7t�ac� J1.Pp1`c�v�l �s�rtn
If yir�u tiQ riat s��ea #h�(� }d.,.�ta
� tl�a�� �Q� M�iir�41( 6i��
�t�i�CF'lii3{� �(1.���1':
5r�1�?:I;ti�a�i3r�dt3!.Y L+at(t�i`C���{tr�rr.;5�±etetrr ..___.....
47 06.12.2015
�#i� i�c3at� �a�ir��, t>r�j����1'3tI11�I���'� ��� 1r�z��I�r�d�l�3�a�i�#�c'�9uI4� �v�ts ���?��1 =�:I�'a.�d�,:�<�i1.�����'�ir��� �.:.,:��^... � �,�1 °�3'' !
5�.. �
�a.F��� ° �:���1���$� �il�iy � Plan_4 .
�r � � �f ,�+i �' . _ .
, �k,*ScUI�S t�f �rr�� �Ci�i� �'�
"�"i�i� �u��"1' �p� f�` �i[ �a3yers,
Pi��;fi �1T4�5�" �1��`ttflfi� 4kYi,
�Qrtli#10tB 1�061'�fii3tt
Jtiiber� (��s� North,"83� ht�.�: S7;B3�'�l, 4444�4?
',5�?!'k� i�l�iiiet riLMCt}t �,dr°h�}`S3� Ft.;�: �a��.9.3�`�,.'"
_ 3 �i�3i#�3 .
' a94Q�M ���ii� 64J�#{.��..�"�xi `�AO�f �"ltf��i f'iFtL'TTJ ��Kd�.k,�...!'.
(�.fiSR� � 7�
5tafi„� Pl�rle W85t;[7C,Y�`8�t �t.�: �9�3�'�?;
, �3��i7fi
(�arri: 1��
LieA�r�phic I(AI,A17$3)� �,�°�,° ��' ��`� W
`zti"' i!' �"' �`
���r: ������,: �������
. C?�?n� �7}-
sasc� �xntarm�sioia
�rut�'�' : Plrt�ft� :
Q�t�d 1Vaa»�: C?tilU�pi:N
Qa��ear-E��#� d: sE
Qua�l t+iam�: C4�AR!'�A�"E�.
t;���rtar�Quad� N�
Tasnrr►ship-FLange-S�cifior�; 28S i.SE 3�i
�`id� Interpolstion'Doi�t�s
Ad�n �7ti�3
:1+iTi'J�8�-�i 1
NA1FD :��
Me�httd.
Statton #:.
5t�tic�t'� �
hl�,�� Fli�l� W�t�s� ti,�4 ft:
Nlesti l..aw W�t�r -1:1t� ft
Sea�rtsnat Ni�h �f'aCer
DrrwrjEc���.� AG��ar�u�i �c�r�ri
�� yc?u da t�c�� s�e-the daE�
tf�aC yo4� P?t�Gt�t, ?Gry'
:r.oc�rr�Rt�g in dc�s�r..
_ , :t.aX7ti �4.�€�}c��=r�`. �i:��A r� f��i� .;�tyi_4=iTr:._ : _.._._.:
�ii��: � C'1� �:
249 Windward Passage
48 06.12.2015
,rtE���;'rr�l:�t=� �� i-ri���.t;r��.:'�tt����`�,'i��.�t�����'�3,' . �:�� � � '��t��i��';sx?t-t,t�':tT�a��.x��;:i�5�3?.x�:: �1�`�;�'���;����7-�3'������;.�:i.������4�.. 1'��r`����i
�. � r_ � ��t ��za�3C�ri:lVi��
. � . . � . ._ _..�...,,. .. . . . �x.. .�.�..... �-�.r.�a�-
_ _ _
_
_ �i _ _
PARKING DEMAND CALCULATION
249 WINDWARD PASSAGE
CLEARWATER MARINE AQUARIUM
Pursuant to CDC Table 2.704, the minimum off-street parking requirement for a Comprehensive
Infll Redevelopment Project shall be determined by the Community Development Coordinator
based on the specific use and/or ITE Manual Standards.
The ITE manual does not include a land use category; therefore alternate, similar comparables
were sought out within the ITE Manual for the proposed use/element. During review and
approval of Case # FLD2011-02006, a methodology and similar use was agreed upon and
established by the applicant and the City.
The principal aquarium element was found to be consistent with the Museum land use, which
requires 1.32 spaces per 1,000 square feet.
The outdoor stadium/tank area was found to be consistent with the Live Theatre land use, which
requires 1 space per 3 seats.
The existing City marina requires 1 space per 2 slips.
Using this methodology, below is the parking requirement:
Principal Aquarium Element: 39,974sf / 1,000 sf x 1.32 spaces = 53 spaces
Outdoor Stadium/Tank area: 246 seats x 1 space/3 seats = 82 spaces
City Marina: 28 slips x 1 space/2 slips = 14 spaces
Total Required Off-Street Parking = 149 spaces
Total Provided Off-Street Parking = 153 spaces
TRA�'FI� IMPA�T STUDY
F�R
�LEAR��.TER MARINE :�1Qi�AKIt�1VI
249 ���tDWARD PAS�AGE
CLEARVVATE� � �'LORIDEt�
PREPARED F4R:
CLEARW;ATE� MARINE AQUt�RILiM, INC,
PREI'ARED BY:
GULF COt4ST Ct7NSULTING, INC.
JUI�TE 20 i 5
PRO��C'T # 1 I-OOS.01
�
,, �
Rabert Per�oliz , PTP
t�ICP #9023, PTP #133
I. INTRODUCTION
The Clearwaier Marine Aquarium is located on the south side of Windward
Passage immediately west of Tsland Way on Island Estates in Clearwater. (See
Figure 1) The owner is p�•oposing to nnodify the facility to include a larger iobby,
a maintenance building, increased parking, and install viewing stands for new
viewing tanks. The improvements to the property are the subject of a site plan
application and this application requires an assessment of the traf�ic impacts of
development. Prior to completing this analysis a methodology was established
with the City of Clearwater staff and this analysis assumes a revised buildout of
2017. This analysis is an update to tlze axaalysis that was conducted in 2011.
II. EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
The property has direct access to Windward Passage west of Island Way. Island
Way is a four-tane divided roadway which is controlled by traf�c signals at the
Clearwater Memoi7al Causeway (SR 60} and at Windward Passage. As requested
by the City of Clearwater traffic engineering staff PM peak period (4-6 PM)
traffic counts that were conduc#ed in January 2011 and Saturday (11 AM — 1PM)
counts that were conducted March 2011 at the following intersections were
factared by a growth rate and used:
Island Way / Clearwater Causeway (SR 60) (signal)
Island Way / Windwaxd Passage {signal)
All tz�affic counts were convei�ted to annual average equivalents using FDOT
seasonal adjustment factors. As requested by the City of Clearvvater a 1% growth
factor was applied to the 2011 counts to reflect existing (2015) canditions.
Existing {2015) traf�'ic volumes are shown in Figure 2 and Figure 2S. Existing
intersections were analyzed using the HCS+ software. The HCS+ printouts are
included in Appendix A.
Presently the signalized intersection at Clearwater Memorial Causeway / Island
Way operates at LOS B during the weekday PM peak hour with average delay
being 13.b seconds per vehicle. During the Saturday peak hour this intez•section
operates at LOS B with average delay being 14.7 seconds per vehicle.
The intersection at Island Way / Windward Passage operates at LOS B during the
weekday PM peak hour with average delay being 12.1 seconds per vehicle.
During the Saturday peak hour this intersection operates at LOS B with average
delay being 12.0 seconds per vehicle.
Island Way functions as collector roadway and accordin� to FDOT 2012 LOS
Handbook capacity tables has a LOS D capacify of 2,630 vehicles per hour on the
four-lane divided roadway. The segment between the Clearwater Memorial
Causeway and Windwa�d Passage presently operates at LOS C during the
EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VQLIJME {2t}15)
Gulf Coast Cvnsulting, Inc. �'A��:
Lan� Development Consulti.ng � f 2015
GJS
F3Y:
PROJCC:T IwIU;
1 1-a05.01
FIGiJREi
EXISTIi�iG SATTJRDAY PEAK HaLTR TRt#FFI� V�JLUIUIE (20�I5}
Gulf Coast +�onsulting, Inc. �A�''
Land Dev�lopment +�onsul#ing ' 6/2015
r��nnwrr s�r:
GJ5
r�zoa�c'r �s�c
1 1—�705.Q1
FIGUREi
weekday PM peak hour cairying 1,025 vehicles, and the segment north of
Windward Passage operates at LOS C cailying 645 vehicles. During the Saturday
peak ho�.0 Island Way carries 777 vehicles between Clearwater Memorial
Causeway and Windward Passage and 557 vehicles north of Windward Passage
wluch represents LOS C opex•arions.
The Clearwater Memorial Causeway is a four-lane divided arterial roadway with
a LOS D peak hour capacity of 3,580 vehicles per hour. The causeway operates at
LOS C during the weekday PM peak hour cariying 2,322 vehicles east of Island
Way and 1,897 vehicles west of Island Way. During the Sati,uday peak hour the
causeway opet�ates at L�S C cariying 2,444 vehicIes east of Island Way and
2,241 vehicles west of Island Way.
III. FUTURE TRAFFIC C4NDITIONS
Existing traf�c was adjusted by a 1% annual growth rate to the expected build-out
year of 2017 to account for background traffic fi•om other nearby redevelopmeiit
projects. The site will be redeveloped to include expanded parking, lobby area,
and a 660 seat viewing a�•ea near the viewing tanks. Using Institute of
Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation, 9t�' Edition rates, the amount of
project trips was calculated and estimate is shown belaw:
TRIP GENERATION ESTIMATES
Land Use Amount PM Peak Trips Saturday Peak hr
Movie Theatar 660 seats 53 (19/34) 60 (22/38)
All vehicular access will be taken from Windward Passage which intersects with
Island Way and the expected distribution is as follows:
95% to / from the south (50 PM peak trips, S7 Saturday peak hour trips}
S% to /from the north (3 PM peak trips, 3 Saturday peak hour trips)
PROJECT IMPACT CALCULATIONS (Sahirday)
Weekday PM Project
Road Segment Lanes Project Trips Capacitv Percent
Island Way. {Causeway — Windward Pass) 4LD 57 263d 2.16%
Island Way {Windward Pass - North) 4LD 3 2630 0. ] 1%
Memorial Causeway (East of Island Way) 4LD 38 3580 1.06%
Memorial Causeway (west of Island Way) 4LD l9 3580 0.53%
With project traffic added the signalized intersection at CIearwater Causeway /
Island Way would continue to operate at LOS B with average delay being 14.0
seconds per vehicle during the weekday PM peak hour. During the Saturday peak
2
hour this intersection would operate at LOS B with average delay being 15.2
seconds per vehicle.
With project traffic added the intersection at Island Way / Windward Fassage
would continue to operate at LOS B with average delay being 12.4 seconds per
vehicie during the weekday PM peak hour. During the Saturday peak hou�• this
intersection would operate at LOS B with average delay being 12.4 seconds per
vehicle.
At the site driveway (Drive A} to Windward Passage the westbound left turns into
the site would operate at LOS A and the no��thbound approacli movements would
continue to operate at LOS A with minimal cielay both during the weekday PM
peak hour and the Sahuday peak hour. Queue calculations indicate there would be
no vehicle stacking fox• any movement at this driveway.
With background traffic and project traffic added the segment of Island Way
Uetween the Clearwater Memorial Causeway and Windward Passage would cany
1,096 vehicles during the weekday PM peak hour and the segcnent no�fih of
Windward Passage would cariy b60 vehicles during the weekday PM peak hour.
This represents LOS C operations which are acceptable. During the Saturday peak
hour Island Way would cany 849 vehicles between Clearwater Memorial
Causeway and Windward Passage and 571 vehicles noi�th of Windward Passage
which represents LOS C operations.
The Memorial Causeway would continue to operate at LOS C during the PM peak
haur carrying 2,403 vehicles east of Island Way and 1,951 vehicles west of Island
Way during the weekday PM peak hoi.u. During the Saturday peak haur the
causeway would continue to operate a# LOS C carrying 2,53I vehicles east of
Island Way and 2,304 vehicles west of Island Way. Future ti•affic volumes are
shown in Figure 3 and Figure 3S, and the HCS+ pi-intouts are inclnded in
Append� B.
IV. CONCLUSION
This analysis was conducted in accordance with a specific methodology
established with City of Clearwater staff. This analysis demonstrates traffic
operations at nearby intersections and on adjacent roadways presently operate at
acceptable levels of service and would continue to operate at acceptable ievels of
seivice with the project impacts.
�o
a
1
��
��
��
c.���
Bi�A�, 9��
�
7p�'8�
� N
�
�
�
�
�
�� ��
,o� �; �$
�— ry � N -+–�.
1$
� ,�s --I � �-.. � �� WiNDWA� PASSAGE
?r ,24 �� � � r
�-- m
���
„s —�
�% „
�f
�j ,
�
�f�
n�
m
� � � 413
2qq �
��S
87¢ �,.. r 1S�
�
'z,�s
�
0
� FUTUF�tE PM PEAK HQUR "['RAFFT(: VOLISME (2�717)
n�7'�:
� e. � ,�, �ulf Coast �Consultiug, Inc.
,, r,�t�C��c�,�r� 6/2015
� ` � r�onrerro� vr�n�a .r�ax►v�a
� � ;.n 1362��ICOTBLV,D.,SUi7'EGQS
c�,�u�r, �i«�ao s3�c�o bRAWN I�Y:
� c+�onB: tzz�r�s2a-iaia �.x: (�23�s2a-soso /� [r
VIfWVir.$Ll1�COH8tOblf$t11L3I1�IIC5.CS�DIII U �J J
�
T
_. _._.. _... � _._ � . __ai
PR41�{:T No,
1 1 :-.Ot?5. Ct 3
�zcu�z�:
98 �
�
Q`�
��.
4�
�����
�``9'�,- r2sy
�
r��
d
�
�
a
�
�
o�
�
�
"fi
�2n � �— ��
� � d � i.6
� �� 1"'_� ,� � � � 4b
71 136 b � � � I
ti4� `�»e+�i
12fl � : cv
��
���
�� �
�
��
K�' "`
�
�
� '" � �sc,
-..` T093
1�� %
sp� �
�
WINDV�rARD P.ASSt�,,GE
1�3q9
�
�
1jg�
'�..
FUTi.JRE SATU�DA"i' PFAK HOUT� TRAFFIC VOLUIVLE (2017)
n�:�r�:
:. Gulf Coa�t Consultin�, Inc.
r�an�G���cc�� 6/2015
�c �srox�r,�,r� rw�a+�� r�s�rrr�a
138?S ICOT SLV D, SL1fl E G45
Cleattroste, rloride 33764 Di2AWN BY:
ruana: (���isz��laia �ax.� (��}s2�-aavo
�.�aoes�����,�o.��m G J S �
l 1 �—Qt�5,0��3
20C9 Peak Seeson Factar Category Repo=t - Re�oxt Type: ALL
CaLegory: 1500 PSN£ii,AS COIINTYWITJE
MOCF: 0.93
WeeY. Da�es SB PSCF
m m m- -�m:: -s�.m.wrs�-�amaaasmmama=e-=�_e - s-�.�ee��
I O1/Ol/2009 - O1/03/2009 1_IO 1.18
2 01/04/2069 - U1/10/2009 1.07 1_14
, 3 O1/11/20Q9 - Di./I7/2009 1.05 1.12
4 O1/18/2009 - O1/24I2C09 gf1.03� 1.10
5 01/25/2009 - 01137./2009 1.fl2 1_08
6 02/O1/2009 - 02/07/2Q09 0.99 1_06
7 02/08/20D9 - 02/14/2009 0.97 1.Og
* 8 02/15/2009 - Q2/2iI2009 0_95 1_62
* 9 02/22/2009 - Q2/28/2009 0_94 I_O1
*10 03/C1/2009 - 03/Ol/2009 0_93 I_00
x11 03/OB/2009 - 03/14/2009 �6r92�. 0.98
•i2 03/15/2009 - 03/21/2009 0.91 �_97
•I3 03/22/20tl9 - 03/28/2009 0.91 0.97
*I9 03/29/2009 - 0910+i/2909 0.92 0.9H
*15 04/OS/2009 - 09/11/2009 0.92 0.98
*16 04/12/2009 - 09/18/2609 0.93 1.00
*17 04/I.9/2009 - OA/25/2009 0.94 1.02
*18 04/26/2009 - 05102/2q99 0.95 ?_92
+19 OS/03/2009 - OS/09/2009 0.96 i.03
*20 OS/10/2099 - QS/ifi/2009 0.97 1.04
21 OS/17/2009 - 05/23/2009 0_97 1.04
22 DS/24/2009 - OS/3U/2009 0.97 1.04
23 OS/31/2009 - 06/06J2009 0.97 1.04
24 US/R7/2C09 - 06/13/2009 0.97 1.04
25 OS/19/2Q09 - 06/20/2009 0.97 1.04
26 06/21/2009 - 06/2�l2069 0.98 1.05
27 06/28/2009 - 07/04/2009 0.98 1.05
28 07/05/2009 - 07/11/2009 0.99 1.06 •
29 �7/7.2/2009 - 0�/1B/2009 �.99 1.06
30 07/19/2009 - 07/25/2009 2.00 1_07
31 07/26l2009 - OB/O1/2009 1.00 I.07
32 08IO2/2009 - 08/OB/2009 1.D1 1.08
33 08/09/2Q09 - 08/15/20D9 1_O1 1.08
34 08/16/2�09 ^ 08/22/20Q9 1.D3 1.10
35 08l23/2009 - Q8/29/20D9 1.04 1.11
36 08i30/2009 - 09/OS/2009 1.05 1.T2
37 69/06/2009 - 09/12/2009 1.06 1_13
38 09/13/2009 - 09/19/2009 1.0� 1.14
39 09/20/2009 - 09/26/2009 1.06 1.13
a0 09/27/2009 - 10/03/2009 1.05 i.13
41 10/04/2009 - 10/10/2009 1.05 1.12
93 10/11l2009 - 10/17/2009 1.05 1_12
93 10/16/20A9 - 10/24/20D9 1.08 1_i2
44 10/25/2009 - IO/31/2009 i.05 1_I3
45 11/O1/2009 - I1/4712009 1.07 1.19
46 11/08/2009 - Il/i9/2009 I.08 1.16
97 ].1I15/2909 - 11f21I2009 1.08 1_16
as ii�s2iaoo9 - iil2ai2oa9 a_os a.i�
99 1iJ29/2009 - 12/OS/2009 1,04 1.17
50 12/a6/2009 - 12/12/2009 1.09 i.i�
52 12/13/2009 - 22/19/2a09 l,lp 1.18
52 12/20/2009 - 12/2E/2009 1_07 1.14
53 12/27/2009 - 12/31/2009 1.05 I.12
* Peak Seasoa
Page 1 of 2
Detailed Report Page 1 of 2
HCS+"' DETAILED REPORT
General lnformation Sife Informat�on
Analyst RP
Intersectiort CAUSEWAY/ISLAND WAY
Agency or Co. GCC Area Type A!! other areas
Date Per#ormed &/95/95 Jurisdiction CLEARWA7ER
Time Period PM PEAK Analysis Year 2015 EXISTING
CONDITIONS
Project ID
Volume and 1'imin /n uf
EB WB NB SB
LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT
Number of Lanes, Nt 9 2 2 1 2 9
Lane Grou L T T R L R
Volume, V v h 135 857 7�0 392 333 9fi5
% Heav Vehicles, %HV 2 2 2 2 2 2
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.96 0.96 .96 0.96 0.95
Pretimed P or Actuated A A A A A A A
Stari-u Lost Time, I� 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Extension of Effective 2.0 2. � 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Green, e
Arrival T e, AT 3 4 4 3 3 3
Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Fiiterin /Meterin , I 9.000 9.0�0 9.000 1.000 9.a00 9.000
fnitial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Ped I Bike / RTOR Volumes 0 0 0 0 80 0 0 0 0 40
Lane Width 12.0 12.0 92.0 '12.0 12.0 12.0
Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N
Parking Maneuvers, Nm
Buses Sto in , Ne 0 0 0 0 0 0
Min. Time for Pedestrians, 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2
Phasin EB Onl EW Perm 03 04 SB Onl 06 07 08
G= 15.0 G= 40.0 G= G= G= 20.0 G= G= G=
Timing Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= 5 Y= Y= Y=
Duration of Anal sis, T= 0.25 C c!e Len th, C= 90.0
Lane Grou Ca acit Control Dela and LOS Determinatlon
EB WB NB SB
LT TH Ri LT TH RT LT TH RT �T TH RT
Adjusted Flow Rate, v 149 893 i71 325 347 930
Lane Group Capacity, c 543 23&5 1576 704 764 352
v/c Ratio, X 0.26 0.38 0.49 0.46 0.45 0.37
Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.67 0.67 0.44 0.44 0.22 0.22
Uniform Delay, d� 6.4 6.7 17.7 97.5 30.3 29.7
Progression Factor, PF 1.004 .383 0.843 1.000 9.000 1.000
Delay Calibration, 3c p. 99 D. 91 0. ? 9 0.19 0.19 0. 91
Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 0.9 0.2 0.5 0.4 0.7
file:U/C:/iJsers/rpergolizzi/AppData/Loca1/Temp/s21c41 E7.tmp 6/1 S/2d 15
Detailed Report
Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0.0
Control Delay 6, 7 2, �
Lane Group LOS q q
Approach Delay 3,2
Approach LOS ,q
Intersection Delay 13.fi
Copyright � 2007 University of Flo�ida, All Rights Reserved
0.0
15.2
B
96.0
e
= 0.48
e�
fiiiil
�
� Intersection LOS
NCS+T� Version 5.3
file:///C:/Userslrpergolizzi/AppData/Local/Temp/s2k41 E7.tmp
Page 2 of 2
i� _ i�
�-�
�-�
30. 6
C
8
Generated: 6/15/20i5 8:45 AM
b/1 S/2015
Detailed Report Page 1 of 2
HCS+'" DETAILED REPORT
Genera! lnformation Slfe Informatlon
Analyst RP
In#ersection CAUSEWAY/lSLAND WAY
Agency or Co. GCC Area Type All othsr areas
Date Performed 6115/15 Jurisdiction CLEARWATER
Time Period SATURDAY PEAK Analysis Year 2aT5 EXIS7ING
CONDlTlONS
Project ID
Volume and Timin ln uf
EB WB NB SB
LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT
Number of Lanes, N� 1 2 2 1 2 �
Lane Grou L T T R L R
Volume, V v h 926 882 1072 237 253 969
% Heav Vehicles, %HV 2 2 2 2 2 2
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF .95 0.95 0.95 0.95 .95 0.95
Pretimed P or Actuated A A A A A A A
Start-u Lost 7ime, I� 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Extension of Effective 2 0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
reen, e
Arrival Ty e, AT 3 4 4 3 3 3
Unit Extensian, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Fi[tering/Meterin , I 1.000 1.000 1.000 9.000 9.000 9.000
Initia! Unmet Demand, Qe 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Ped / Bike 1 RTOR Volumes 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width 12.0 92.0 12.0 92.0 �J2.0 12.0
Parking I Grade I Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N
Parking Maneuvers, Nm
Buses Sto in , Ns 0 0 0 0 0 0
Min. Time for Pedestrians, 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2
G
Phasin EB Onl EW Perm 03 04 SB On1 06 07 08
G= ?5.0 G= 40.0 G= G= G= 20.0 G= G= G=
Timing Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= 5 Y= Y= Y=
Duration of Anal sis, 7= 0.25 C cle Len th, C= 90.0
Lane Grau Ca acit , Control Dela and LOS De#erminaifon
EB WB NB SB
LT TH RT L7 TH R7 LT TH R7 LT TH R7
Adjusted Flow Rate, v 133 928 1128 249 268 169
Lane Group Capacity,c 4�g 2365 1576 704 764 352
v/c Ratio, X 0.32 0.39 0.72 0.35 0.35 0.48
Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.67 O.6i 0.44 0.44 0.22 0.22
Uniform Delay, d� 9.0 6.8 20.4 16.5 29.5 30.5
Progression Factor, PF 1.000 0.383 0.843 9.000 1.000 9.OQ0
Delay Calibration, k 0.19 0.11 0.28 0.11 0. 9 9 0.11
lncremental Delay, d2 0.4 0.1 ?.8 0.3 0.3 1.0
file:///C:/Users/rpergolizzi/AppData/Local/Temp/s21c6A3E.imp 6/15/2015
Detailed Report
Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0.0
Controi Delay 9.4 2.7
Lane Group LOS ,q ,q
Approach Delay 3.5
Approach LOS ,q
Intersectian Delay 94.7
Copyrightm 2007 Universiry of Florida, All RigMs Reserved
- i�
. "
.�
�
�
. � .i
0.0
16.8
B
I Intersection LOS
NCS+TM Version 5.3
file:///C:/Users/rpergolirzi/AppData/Local/Temp/s2k6A3E. tnnp
Page 2 of 2
�� _ ��
�-�
�-�
30.5
C
B
Generated: 6/15/2015 8:59 AM
6/I S/2015
Detailed Report Page 1 of 2
HCS+'" DETAILED REPORT
General lnfarmatlon Site Informatlon
Analyst RP
Intersection �SLAND WAY/WINDWARO
Agency ar Co. GCC Area Type All other areas
Date Performed 6/95/95 Jurisdiction CLEARWATER
Time Period PM PEAK Analysis Year 2a15 EXlSTING
CONDlT10NS
Project ID
Volume and Tlmin In ut
EB WB NB SB
LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT
Number of Lanes, N� 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 2 0 9 2 0
Lane Grou LT R LT R L TR L TR
Volume, V v h 4 2 82 36 2 8 92 351 66 29 250 19
% Heav Vehicles, %HV 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Peak-Nour Factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 .97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97
Pretimed (P) or ActuaEed A A A A A A A A A A A A
A
Start-up Lost Time, I� 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.Q 2.0 2.0
Extension of Effec#ive 2 a 2 p 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
reen, e
Arrival T pe, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Filtering/Metering, I 1.000 .000 1.000 1.000 9.000 .000 1.000 .000
Initial Unme# Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Ped I Bike / RTOR 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
olumes
Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
Parking I Grade 1 Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N
Parking Maneuvers, Nm
Buses Stop in , Ne 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Min. Time for Pedestrians, 3.2 3.2 3.2 32
Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 Excl. l.eft NS Perm O7 08
Timing G= 15.0 G= G= G= G= 9.0 G= 32.0 G= G=
Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y=
Duration of Anal sis, 7= 0.25 Cycle Length, C= 70.0
Lane Grou Ca acit Control Dela and LOS Determination
EB WB NB S8
LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT
Adjusted Flow Rate, v 6 64 39 8 95 430 22 269
Lane Graup Capacity, c 363 339 397 339 755 1583 649 9691
v/c Ra#io, X 0.02 0.19 0.92 0.02 .93 0.27 0.03 0.97
Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.21 0.29 0.29 0.21 .66 0.46 0.66 0.46
Uniform Delay, d� 21.7 22.5 22.2 21.7 4.4 91.8 4.4 19.2
Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 9.000 9.000 1.Q00 9.OQ0 1.000 9.000
Delay Calibration, k 0.91 0.91 0.19 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.91 0.91
file:///C:/Users/rpergolizzi/AppData/Local/'Temp/s2kC52A.tinp 6/15/2015
Detailed Repoi�t
Incremental Delay, d2 0.0 0.3
Initial Queue Delay, d3 rr� �0.0 0.0
Control Delay 21.7 22.8
Lane Group LOS C C
Approach Delay 22, 7
Approach LOS C
Intersection Delay 92.1
Copyright � 2007 University of Florlda, All Rights Reserved
0.2
0.0
22.4
C
22.3
C
X� = 0.27
0.0 0.1 0. 9
0.0 0.0 0.0
21.7 4.5 91.9
C A B
90.5
B
Intersection LOS
NCS+j� Version 5.3
file:///C:/Usershpergolizzi/AppData/Loca1/Temp/s2kC52A.tmp
Page 2 of 2
0.0 D.0
0.0 0.0
4.4 91.2
A 8
90.7
8
B
Generated: 6/15/2015 9:05 AM
5/15/2015
Detailed Report Page 1 of 2
HCS+'° DETAILED REPORT
General lnformation � Site lnformaffon
Analyst RP
Intersec6on 1SLAND WAY/W/NDWARD
Agency or Co. GCC Area Type All ofher areas
Date Performed 6/15/15 Jurisdiction CLEARWATER
Time Period SATURDAY PEAK Analysis Year 2095 EXlSTlNG
CONDITIONS
Project ID
Volume and Timfn In ut
EB WB NB SB
LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT
Number of Lanes, N� 0 1 9 � 9 1 9 2 0 9 2 0
l.ane Grou LT R LT R L TR L TR
Volume, V v h 4 10 82 45 10 19 89 229 39 14 281 98
% Hea Vehicles, %HV 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 .96 0.96 0.96 .96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 .96 0.96
Pretimed (P) ar Actuated A A A A A A A A A A A A
A
Start-u Lost Time, I� 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Extension of Effective 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
reen, e
Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Filtering/Metering, I 1.000 .000 9.000 .000 9.000 .000 i.000 1.000
Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Ped / Bike I RTOR 0 0 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
olumes
Lane Width 92.0 12.Q 92.0 92.0 12.0 92.0 12.0 12.0
Parking I Grade I Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N D N
Parking Maneuvers, Nm
Buses Sto pin , Ne 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 0
Min. Time for Pedestrians, 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2
G
Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 Excl. Left NS Perm 07 08
G= 95.0 G= G= G= G= 9.0 G= 32.0 G= G=
7iming Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y=
Duration of Anal sis, T= 0.25 Cycle Length, C= 70.0
Lane Grou Ca aci Control Dela and LOS Determination
EB WB NB SB
LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT
Adjusted F'low Rate, v 14 33 57 19 93 279 95 392
Lane Group Capacity,c 381 339 398 339 725 1593 753 1608
v/c Ratio, X 0.04 0.90 0.18 0.03 0.13 0. 97 0.02 0. 99
7atal Green Ratio, g/C 0.21 0.29 0.29 0.21 0.66 0.46 0.66 0.46
Uniform Defay, d� 21.8 22.1 22.5 21.8 4.5 99.2 4.2 17.3
Progression Factor, PF 1.000 9.000 1.000 9.000 1.000 9.000 9.000 1.000
Delay Calibration, k 0.19 0. 9 9 0.11 0. 91 0.19 0.11 0.19 0.11
iile:///C:/Usez s/rpergolizzi/AppData/LocaUTemp/s2kDBF4,trnp 6/l 5/2015
Detailed Report
Incremental Delay, d2 0.0 0.1
Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0.0
Control Delay 2�,g 22,2
Lane Group LOS C C
Approach Delay 22. �
Approach LOS C
Intersection Delay 12,p
Copyright � 2007 University of Florida, AII Wghts Reserved
0.3 D.0 D.1 0. 9
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
22.7 21.8 4.5 91.2
C C A 8
22.6 9.5
C A
= �-22 Intersection LOS
HCS+T� Version 5.3
Page 2 of 2
0.0 0.1
D.0 Q.0
4.2 19.4
A 8
11.1
B
B
Generated: 6/i5/2015 9:11 AM
file:///C:/Users/rpergalizzi/�ppData/Local/Temp/s21cDBF4.tmp 6/ 15/201 S
Generalized Peak Hour Two-Way Volumes for Florida's
TABLE 4 UrbanixedAreasi �
STATE SIGNALIZCD ARTERIALS
Class I(40 mph or higher posted speed limit)
Lanes Median B C D
2 Undivided * 1,510 1,600
4 Divided * 3,420
6 Divided * 5,254 5,390
8 Divided * 7,090 7,210
C��1���n�
Class II(35 mph or slower pasted speed limit}
FREEWAYS
Lanes B C D E
4 4,120 5,540 6,700 '7,190
E 6 6,134 8,370 10,060 11,100
** 8 8,23Q 11,100 13,390 15,010
** 10 10,330 14,040 16,840 18,93�
** 12 14,450 18,880 22,030 22,860
**
Lanes Median B C D E
2 Undiv,ided �` 660 1,330 1,410
4 Divided * 1,310 ,92 3,040
6 Divided * 2,U90 4,500 4,590
8 Divided * 2,880 6,060 6,130
4�b C�+�, �s��� �,� i I$� �43A
c� p�j, Non-State Signalized Road�vay AdJustments
(Alter cottcsponding state volumes
by tho indicated peroe�J
Non-State Signalized Roadways -10%
Median & Turn Lane Adjustrr�ents
Na�clusive Eacclusive
Lanes Median Left Lanas Right Lanes
2 Divided Yes No
2 Undivided No No
Multi Undivided Yes No
Multi Undivided No I�io
- - - Yes
One-Way Facility Adjustrnent
Multiply the corresponding two-directional
volumes in tlus tsble by 0.6
Freeway Ad,justments
Auxiliazy Lanes Ramp
Present in Both Directions Metering
+ 1,800 -+� 5%
Adjustinent UNINTERRUPTED FLOW ffiGHWAYS
Factors Lanes Median B C D E
+5% 2 Undivided 770 1,53Q 2,170 2,990
_2pa/o 4 Divided 3,300 4,660 5,900 6,530
-5% 6 Divided 4,950 6,990 8,840 9,790
-25%
+ 5% Uninterrupted Ftow Highway Ad,justments
Lanes Median Exclusive Left lanes Adjustrnent factors
2 Divided Yes +5%
MuRi Undivided Yes -5%
Multi Undivided No -25%
BICYCLE MODEZ
(Multiply mototized vehicle volumes shown batow by aumber of
directional rosdwey lanav to deteamiue two-way umximum service
volumes.)
Paved ShoulderBicycle
Lane Coverage B C D E
0-49% * 260 680 1,770
50-84% 190 600 1,770 >1,770
ss-iao�io s3a i,7�o >�,��a **
PEDESTRIAN MODE�
{Multiply motorized vehicle wlumes shown bebw by number of
d'uectional toedway lanes to determine hvo-way ma�cimumservice
volumes.)
Sidewalk Cov�ei�age B C D E
0-49% �' * 250 850
50-84% '" 150 780 1,420
85-100% 340 960 1,Sb0 >1,770
BU5 MODE (5cheduled Fixed Route}3
(Buses in peak hour in peak direcliott)
Sidewalk Coveraga B C D B
0-84% > 5 >_ 4 >_ 3 >_ 2
85-100% > 4 > 3 > 2 >_ 1
ur hvo weY,yolumas Eoi,levak of serv�ce erd
ss spec{t5cally,stated. Tha fabk docs uot
. ;;
odpfor 8�n5��P��B.�Pl�cekpn+„Thc
� �--:-•� -�-••,a ..- °:-„�_ .�_ _�__a_ _ _ .. .
��ww . .��M .�w��w v...Jv w v. f......... �u.ub �w�uV
� Husa perhowabown are only, for t6epeelc lnis m tlmsmgb d4ectionofth� h�er haffic
flow.
' Ce�mot6e ecltievcd uaing,tebb iopuS value defeuits.
•' N.ot yi�lcabb fartliat kre} ofservice ktter grada.FOr t�e eu[omobile mode
volumes grea�er Ihan kvel of se[rnR D bccome F beasus� mlw§ictipn cep4cRks 1teYo
been ieached: Fo� the bicycb moda, tl�q lcvel of su�ka klter.g4ade (ittcludlpg F7 ia nnt.'
_
acliieyebk beceurse thete is ioo maxirnum yel�icla; vo4�mn thms6otd osiog tebk mput .:
valub deSaulls, :
�:: , '
Source
; Fbrfda Depa[tment ofTraarpurtat�on
Syskms P.iepniug OtCue ; ,; ,
wyny��,gsptc.� nn Q/systam/sm�bsldefaufl.shhn
2012 FDOT QUALITY/LEVEL OF SERVICE NANDBQQK �"ABLES
�" �i C
.�
Multiplex Movie Theater
(445}
Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Seats
On a: Weetcday,
Peak Hour of Adjacenf Street Traffic,
One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m,
Number of Studies: 2
Average Number of Seats: 3,325
Directiona) Distribution: 36% entering, 64% exiting
Trip Generation per Seat
Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation
0.08 oA6 - o.as *
Data Plot and
�
�
W
Q
h
m
V
�
�
N
�
�
Q
��
E-
ac
300
206
Cautlon - Use Carefully - Small Sample Slze
x
; ; : : : : ; : ' ; ; ; ; ' �,`~ ; : :
�--- - - -- - -- - ------- - - --- - �- ,--. _. ; . � . y _ " -- , -� , ---,--- , -
� . ' . . 'y' '', . . ' . . � � , � . � �
i ; " ; . " i " ' ; . ' ; ' ' ; _ _ ; ' ; . ' � " _ . . � - ; . ; . ; � _ _ . . ; . . : . . t .
100 � � ' '
2400 2500 2600 2700 2800 2900 3000 3100 3200 3300 9400 3500 3600 3700 3600 3900 4000 4100 4200 4300
X = Number of Seats
X Actual Daia Polnts
�itted Curve Equatton: Not glven
868 Trip Generetfon, 9th Edition • Institute of Transpo�#ation Engineers
"�°--- Average Rale
�z _ **,.+�
Multiplex Movie Theater
(445)
Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Seats
On a: Saturday,
Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic,
One Hour between 11 a.m. and 7 p.m.
Number of Studies: 7
Average Number of Seats: 4,099
Directional Distribution: 72% entering, 28% exiting
Trip Genera#ion per Seat
Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation
, 0.09 0.06 - 0.14 0.30
Trip Generation, 9th Edition • Institute of Transportation Engineers 871
Detailed Report Page 1 of 2
HCS+'" DETAILED REPORT
General lnformatlon Site lnformafian
Analyst RP Intersection CAUSEWAY/ISLAND W,4Y
Agency or Co. GCC Area Type A!! other areas
Date Pertormed 6/95/15 Jurisdicfion CLEARWATER
Time Period PM PEAK Analysis Year FUTURE WITH PROJECT
Project ID
Volume and Timin ln uf
EB WB NB SB
LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT
Number of Lanes, Nl 1 2 2 1 2 1
Lane Grou L T T R L R
Volume, V v h ?44 874 755 412 362 178
% Heav Vehicles, %HV 2 2 2 2 2 2
Peak-Hour Factor PHF .96 0.96 0.86 .96 0.96 0.96
Pretimed P or Actuated A A A A A A A
Siart-u Lost Time, I� 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Extension of Effec#ive 2 0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Green e
Arrival T e, AT 3 4 4 3 3 3
Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Filterin /Meterin , I 9.000 1.000 9.000 1.000 9.000 1.000
lnitial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 D.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Ped / Bike I RTOR Volumes 0 0 0 0 80 0 0 0 0 40
Lane Width 12.0 i2.0 12.0 12.0 12.� 12.0
Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 4 N N 0 N
Parkin Maneuvers, Nm
Buses Sto in , Na 0 0 0 D 0 0
Min. Time for Pedestrians, 3 2 3.2 3.2 3.2
G
Phasin EB On) EW Perm 03 04 SB Onl 06 07 08
Timing G= 15.0 G= 40.0 G= G= G= 20.0 G= G= G=
Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= 5 Y= Y= Y=
Duration of Anal sis, T= 0.25 C cle Len #h, C= 90.0
Lane Grou Ca acft Con#rol Dela and LOS Determrnafion
EB WB NB SB
LT TH RT LT TH R7 LT 7H RT LT TH RT
Adjusted Flow Rate, v l50 990 786 346 377 944
Lane Group Capacity, c 537 2365 1578 704 i64 352
v/c Ratio, X ,28 0.38 0.50 0.49 0.49 0.41
Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.67 0.67 0.44 0.44 0.22 0.22
Uniform Delay, di 6.5 6.7 17.8 17.8 0.8 29.9
Progression Factor, PF �.OQO .383 0.843 1.000 1.000 1.000
Delay Calibration, k .91 0.11 0.19 0.11 0.11 0.19
Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 0.1 . �.2 0.5 0.5 0.8
Initial Queue Delay, d3 O.Q 0.0 0.0 0.0 D.0 0.0
file:///C:/Users/rpergolizzi/AppData/Local/Temp/s2kCEDC,tmp 6/15/2Q15
Detailed Report
Control Delay g, g z. 7
Lane Group LQS A A
Approach Delay 3.3
Approach LOS q
Intersection Delay 94.0
Copyrlght � 2007 UniversEty oi Florida, All Rights Reserved
95.3
B
16.2
B
X� = 0.50
98.3
B
Page 2 of 2
31.1 30.7
C C
39. 0
C
Intersection LOS 8
NCS+TM Verslon 5.3 Generated: 6/15/2015 10:42 AM
� le:///C:/Users/ipergolizzi/AppData/Local/Temp/s2kCEDC.tmp
6/15/2015
Detailed Report Page I of 2
HCS�'" DETAII.ED REPORT
General lnformafion Slte lnformatlon
Analyst RP Intersection CAUSEWAY/1SLAND WAY
Agency or Co. GCC Area Type All other areas
Date Performed 6/15/15 Jurisdiction CLEARWATER
Time Period SATURDAY PEAK Analysis Year FU7URE WlTH PROJECT
Project ID
Volume and Timin In ut
EB WB NB SB
LT TH RT L7 i'H RT LT TH R7 LT TH RT
Number af Lanes, N� 1 2 2 1 2 1
Lane Grou L T T R L R
Vofume, V v h 135 900 1093 256 282 176
% Heav Vehicles %HV 2 2 2 2 2 2
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 Q.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 .95
Pretimed P or Actuated A A A A A A A
Start-u Lost Time, li 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.Q 2.0 2.0
Extension of Effective 2 0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
reen, e
Arrival T e AT 3 4 4 3 3 3
Unit Ex#ension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Filterin /Meterin , I 1.000 9.000 1.000 i.040 1.000 1.000
lnitial Unmet Demand, Qa 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Ped I Bike / RTOR Volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width 12.0 'J2.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N
Parking Maneuver�s, Nm
Buses Sto in , Na 0 0 0 0 0 0
Min. Time for Pedestrians, 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2
Phasin EB Onl EW Perm 03 04 SB Onl �6 07 08
Timing G= 15.0 G= 40.0 G= G= G= 20.0 G= G= G=
Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= 5 Y= Y= Y=
Duration of Anal sis, 7= 0.25 C cle Len th, C= 90.0
L.ane Grou Ca acif Conirol Dela and LOS Determinatlon
EB WB NB SB
LT 7H R7 LT TH RT LT TH RT L3 TH RT
Adjusted Flow Rate, v 942 947 1159 269 287 185
LaRe Group Capacity, c 411 2365 9576 704 764 352
v/c Ratio, X 0.35 0.40 0.73 0.38 0.39 0.53
Tota) Green Ratio, g/C p.67 0.6i 0.44 0.44 0.22 0.22
Uniform Delay, d� 9.4 6.8 20.6 96.7 29.8 30.8
Progression Factor, PF 1.000 0.383 0.843 1.d00 1.000 1.000
Delay Calibration, k 0.19 �.11 0.29 0.19 0.11 0.13
Incremenfal Delay, d2 0.5 0.1 9.8 0.3 0.3 9.5
Initial Queue De(ay, d3 0.0 O.a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
file:///C:/LJsers/rpergolizzi/AppData/Local/Temp/s2k4AEE.tmp 6/15/2015
Detailed Report
Con#rol Delay g.9 2.7
Lane Group LOS q q
Approach Delay 3.7
Approach I.OS A
Intersection Delay ��,2
Copyright � 2007 Unfversity of Florida, All Rights Reserved
99.9 17.9
8 B
18.7
B
� = 0. 63
Intersection LOS
HCS+TM Verslon 5_3
file:///C:/Users/rpergolizzi/AppData/Loca1/Temp/s21c4AEE.tnnp
Page 2 of 2
30.1 32.3
C C
39.0
C
B
Generated: 6/15/2015 90:44 AM
6/15/2015
Detailed Report Page 1 of 2
HCS+'" DETAiLED REPORT
Generai l»formatJon Slte Informatlon
Analyst RP Inte�section �SLAND WaY/WINDWARD
Agency or Co. GCC Area Type A!! otherareas
Date Performed 6/15/15 Jurisdiction CLEARWATER
Time Period PM PEAK Analysis Year FUTURE WlTH PROJECT
Project ID
Volume and Timin !n ut
EB WB NB SB
LT TH F27 L.T TH RT LT TH RT Li TH R7
Number of Lanes, N1 0 1 1 0 9 1 1 2 0 1 2 0
Lane Grou LT R LT R L TR L TR
Volume, V v h 6 2 916 37 2 8 192 358 67 21 255 12
% Hea Vehicles, %HV 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Peak-Hour Factar, PHF .97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 .97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 .97 0.97
Pretimed (P) or Actuated � R p A A A A A A A A A
A
Start-u l,ost Time, I� 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.Q 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Extension of Effective 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
reen, e
Arrival T pe, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Filterin /Meterin , I 1.000 .000 1.000 .000 9.000 .000 1.000 9.000
Initial Unmet Demand, Qn 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Ped / Bike / RTOR D 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
olumes
Lane Width 92.0 92.0 12.0 92.0 12.0 92.0 12.0 12.0
Parking 1 Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N
Paricing Maneuvers, Nm
Buses Sto in , Na 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Min. Time for Pedestrians, 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2
Gp
Phasin EW Perm 02 03 04 Excl. Left NS Perm 07 08
G= 15.0 G= G= G= G= 9.0 G= 32.0 G= G=
Timing Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y=
Duration of Analysis, T= 0.25 C cle Length, C= 70.0
Lane Grou Ca acit , Contro/ Dela , and LOS Determination
EB WB NB SB
LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TM RT
Adjusted Flow Rate, v 8 99 40 B 115 438 22 275
Lane Group Capacity, c 356 339 39S 339 751 1583 645 1619
v/c Ratio, X O. Q2 0. 29 0.13 0.02 0.15 0.28 0.03 0. 9 i
Total Green Ratio, g/C p,21 p.2� 0.29 0.21 O.S6 0.48 0.66 0.46
Uniform Delay, d� 21.7 23.0 22,2 29.7 4.5 11.8 4.4 11.2
Progression Factor, PF 1.000 i.000 1.000 1.000 9.Q00 1.000 9.000 1.004
Defay Calibration, k 0.11 0.11 0.99 0.91 0.99 0.11 0.11 0.19
Incremental Delay, d2 0.0 0.5 0.2 0.0 0.9 0.1 0.0 0.1
file:///C:/Users/rpergolizz'�/AppData/LocaUTemp/s2kECE7.tmp 6/] 5/2415
Detailed Report
Initiai Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0.0
Controi Delay 21.7 23.5
Lane Group LOS C C
Approach Delay 23.4
Approach LOS C
Intersection Delay �2,4
Copyright � 2007 University oi Florida, All Rights Reserved
Pa�e 2 of 2
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
22.4 21.7 4.6 91.9 4.4 99.2
C C A B A 8
22.3 10.4 10.7
C B B
X� = 0.32 Intersectian LOS 8
HCS+TM Version 5.3 Generated: 8/15Y2015 10:46 AM
file:///C:/Users/x•pergolizzi/AppData/I,ocal/Temp/s21cECE7.tmp
6/15/2015
Detailed Report Page 1 of 2
HCS+'" DETAiLED REPORT
General lnformation Site lnformation
Analyst RP Intersection lSL4ND WAY/WINDWARD
Agency or Co. GCC Area Type A11 ofherar�as
Date Performed 6/15/15 Jurisdiction CLEARWATER
Time Period SA7'URDAY PEAK Analysis Year FUTURE W1TH PROJECT
Project iD
Volume and Tim1n Jn ut
EB WB NB SB
LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT
Number of Lanes, N� 0 1 1 0 1 9 1 2 0 9 2 0
Lane Grou LT R LT R L TR L TR
Volume, V v h 6 10 120 46 90 91 192 234 32 94 287 19
% Heav Vehicles %HV 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.98 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 .96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96
Pretimed (P} or Actuated A A A A A A A A A A A A
A
Start-u Lost Time, I� 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Extension of Effective Z 0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
reen, e
Arrival T e, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Filterin /Meterin , I 1.000 .000 9.000 .000 9.000 .000 9.000 1.00Q
Initial Unmet Demand, Qb O.a 0.0 0.0 O.Q 0.0 0.0 D.0 0.0
Ped / Bike / RTOR 0 0 50 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0
ofumes
Lane Vlldth 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 92.0 92.0 12.0
Parking / Grade / Paricing N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N
Parking Maneuvers, Nm
Buses Sto in , Ns 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0
Min. Time for Pedestrians, 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2
GP
Phasin EW Perm 02 03 04 Excl. Left N5 Perm 07 08
Timing G= 95.0 G= G= G= G= 9.0 G= 32.0 G= G=
Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y=
Duration of Anal sis, T= 0.25 C cle Length, C= 70.0
Lane Grou Ca aci , Control Dela and LOS Defermination
EB WB NB SB
LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT
Adjusted Flow Rate, v 18 73 58 11 197 277 75 399
Lane Graup Capacity, c 373 339 317 339 720 9592 749 9606
v/c Ratio, X 0.04 0.22 0.18 0.03 .96 0. i7 0.02 0.20
Total Green Ratio, g/C p,21 p,21 Q.29 0.21 ,66 0.46 0.66 0.46
Uniform Delay, d� 21.8 22.7 22.5 29.8 4.5 11.2 4.2 99.3
Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 9.000 1.000 1.OQ0
DelayCalibration,k 0.11 0.91 O.i? 0.99 0.11 0.99 0.91 0.11
Incremental Delay, d2 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1
file:///C:/Users/rpergolizzi/AppData/Local/Temp/s2kEl OS.tmp 6/1 S/2015
Detailed Report
Initiaf Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0.0
Control Delay 21.9 23.0
Lane Group LOS C C
Approach Delay 22,g
Approach LOS C
Intersection Delay 12.4
Copyright � 2U07 Universiiy of Florida, AIE Rights Reserved
0.0
22.8
C
22.6
C
�=0.25
0.0 0.0 0.0
29.8 4.8 11.3
C A B
9.3
A
intersection LOS
HCS+TM Version 5.3
file:///C:/Users/rpergolizzi/AppData/LocaUTemp/s2kE 1 OS.ttnp
Pa�e 2 of 2
0.0 D.0
4.2 91.4
A B
11.1
B
B
Generated: fi115/2015 1 Q:48 AM
6/15/2015
Two-Way Stop Coi�trol Fage 1 of 1
�opyngn�rr zwi universiry or riorwa, fui tt�gnts tteservea NCS+�M yersbn 5.3 Generated: 6115l2015 i0:51 AM
file:///C;/Users/rpergolizzi/AppData/LocaUTemp/u2kF2E2,tmp 6/15/201 S
Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1
file:///C:/Use�•s/rpergolizzi/AppData/Local/Temp/u2kF41 A.tmp fi/15/2015