07/13/2015 Community Redevelopment Agency Meeting Minutes July 13, 2015
City of Clearwater
City Hall
112 S. Osceola Avenue
Clearwater, FL 33756
e d
s
w
r'
�mu
Meeting Minutes
Monday, July 13, 2015
1 :00 PM
City Hall Chambers
Community Redevelopment Agency
Page 1
City of Clearwater
Community Redevelopment Agency Meeting Minutes July 13, 2015
Roll Call
Present 5 - Chair George N. Cretekos, Trustee Doreen Hock-DiPolito, Trustee
Jay E. Polglaze, Trustee Bill Jonson, and Trustee Hoyt Hamilton
Also Present —William B. Horne — City Manager, Jill Silverboard —Assistant City
Manager, Rod Irwin — CRA Executive Director/Assistant City
Manager, Pamela K. Akin — City Attorney, Rosemarie Call — City
Clerk, Nicole Sprague — Official Records and Legislative Services
Coordinator
To provide continuity for research, items are listed in agenda order although not
necessarily discussed in that order.
1. Call To Order— Chair Cretekos
The meeting was called to order at 1:15 p.m.
2. Approval of Minutes
2.1 Approve the minutes of the June 15, 2015 CRA meeting as submitted in written
summation by the City Clerk.
Trustee Jonson moved to approve the minutes of the June 15, 2015
CRA meeting as submitted in written summation by the City Clerk.
The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
Chair Cretekos reminded the Trustees, as stressed in the required
ethics class for elected officials, the minutes are a record of what was
done and not what was said. Members of the collegial body should not
worry about wordsmithing unless it is associated with a motion that was
made.
3. Citizens to be Heard Regarding Items Not on the Agenda — None.
4. New Business Items
4.1 Approve Project Template for ULI Bluff/Coachman Park/Waterfront Master Plan
Development
Page 2
City of Clearwater
Community Redevelopment Agency Meeting Minutes July 13, 2015
Provide direction concerning the form, timing and structure of the process to
develop a Bluff/Coachman Park/Waterfront Master Development Plan,
pursuant to the ULI Advisory Services Panel Report recommendation and CRA
Board direction at the June meeting.
The ULI Advisory Services Panel Report recommended development of a
Bluff/Coachman Park/Waterfront Master Development Plan to define and
further delineate the components of the recommendations of the Report.
At the June CRA meeting, the Board discussed alternate formats to
accomplish this recommendation and directed staff to further define the
"hybrid" approach delineated in the staff presentation. The attached Program
Template is intended to provide that delineation, and to serve as the outline
around which staff will develop the Master Development Plan process and
RFP(s). Staff seeks Board feedback as to whether this outline meets Board
expectations before developing the formal RFP documents.
PLEASE NOTE: This cost estimate does not include any cost for retention of a
fee-based developer to participate in the process. Such participation is
unusual and staff is discussing the availability, form and cost of such an
engagement with the developer community, and will update the Program
Template when details are clarified.
However, it seems likely that the developer fees could equal or exceed the
stated Master Plan consultant fees in the Program Template. The reason is
that for a developer of the quality sought to commit time and effort into the
process, there would be an "opportunity cost" calculation regarding whether
their time could be more profitable in a private development venture, and
he/she would need to be compensated accordingly. The "rebound" in the
economy for development at present provides investment opportunities not
seen in Florida over the past eight years of recession.
The ULI Report and the Redevelopment Plan recommend a master
development plan that focuses on generating private investment along the
Bluff, integrated with the Park and Waterfront to achieve the redevelopment of
Downtown. Thus, the ULI report emphasizes engaging a developer at the
outset to be intimately involved in the process and ensure economic feasibility
and market reality in the Plan design and components.
Staff will continue to explore alternatives to achieve this developer/economic
feasibility component and advise accordingly. One alternative may be to
restructure the process and select a developer firm to lead the process, who
would then assemble a team to address park design, waterfront and other
component parts of the Plan.
Staff looks forward to discussing these issues with the Board and receiving
direction on how to further proceed.
Page 3
City of Clearwater
Community Redevelopment Agency Meeting Minutes July 13, 2015
Planning and Development Director Michael Delk said the objective of the
Bluff Master Plan is to formulate a master development for the Bluff and the
Coachman Park waterfront property to facilitate the recommendations of
the ULI Panel. Staff estimates it will take approximately 22 months at a
cost of$200,000 to $250,000. Mr. Delk reviewed the proposed timeline-
60-90 days to prepare and issue the Request for Proposals, 2 months to
engage the consultants and refine the scope of work, 1 month to
establish a stakeholders advisory group, 12 months for analysis/public
engagement process and prepare draft of key component of work, and 1
month for a special work session to review the draft plan.
CRA Executive Director/Assistant City Manager Rod Irwin said the
process may take 3 years to complete as there will likely be changes to the
Downtown Plan and the City Charter.
Economic Development and Housing Director Geri Campos Lopez said
the ULI panel did not recommend the piece-meal approach. ULI
suggested taking an integrated approach that knitted the waterfront park
and private investment on the Bluff into the Downtown core. The public
engagement component is critical for the vision buy-in, which provides
prospective developers the comfort needed when anticipating a future
referendum. Staff has contacted developers and development
consultants throughout the state regarding the market study component.
Ms. Campos Lopez said developers are responding to the market and
currently interested in pursuing deals that can be developed within a
year. The challenge in Clearwater is creating the desired market. Staff
is identifying projects with the desired components and activities to
identify the developers and processes used for those projects. Staff
needs more time to conduct research; and anticipates refining the
information by the end of August.
In response to questions, Ms. Campos Lopez said she did not discuss
the visioning process with the ULI consultant she has contacted, but
discussed the recommendation to develop a master plan for the Bluff.
The planning consultant would lead the community outreach component.
Identifying the desired projects would allow staff to approach the
developers with experience and determine if the developers were willing
to work with the City. The developer and master planner consultants would be
on-board when the public engagement begins. Mr. Irwin said the developers
would also have the ability to assemble a team of consultants. Ms. Campos
Lopez said developers are not keen to responding to an RFP that hits their
desk given some of the City's charter restrictions. The department's real
estate brochure does not identify the Bluff area, but does describe the
Page 4
City of Clearwater
Community Redevelopment Agency Meeting Minutes July 13, 2015
ULI recommendations and development opportunities. Mr. Irwin said direction
will be needed regarding how intricate the public engagement process is
desired by the Trustees. The Master Plan will identify how to better
activate and support the waterfront, the commercial component along
the Bluff, and a robust Coachman Park master plan. Ms. Campos
Lopez said the amenities, such as the park, are place-making tools in
urban design, the commercial component must complement the park to
give individuals a reason to stay. Staff will be looking at national
projects to identify potential developers. The Bluff Master Plan
encompasses the Harborview and the City Hall sites. Mr. Irwin said the
City controls the Harborview and City Hall sites, as well as the parking
area between the Harborview and the Main Library. The current charter
restrictions are challenging, the market will be hot when the restrictions will be
addressed through a referendum.
Discussion ensued with support expressed to proceed with the proposed
process outline. A concern was expressed with the proposed timeline to issue
the RFP may be too long.
It was suggested that the template discuss the real objectives, rather
than referencing two documents, and outline the anticipated deliverables, as
the master plan would have several components.
Trustee Jonson moved to reference the template as a conceptual
document, rather than a literal document, subject to review and drafting
by the staff.
Motion failed for lack of a second.
Trustee Hamilton moved to approve Project Template for ULI
Bluff/Coachman Park/Waterfront Master Plan Development. The
motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
4.2 Approve the Purchase Contract for acquisition of real property located at 1356 Park
Street, Clearwater, by the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of
Clearwater (CRA), with a purchase price of$51,300 and total expenditures not to
exceed $65,000 including environmental assessments, closing costs and demolition
expenses and ongoing maintenance; authorize the appropriate officials to execute
same, together with all other instruments required to affect closing; and, approve a
transfer of$65,000 from CRA Project 388-94714, Downtown Redevelopment, to a
new Project 388-94884, Property Acquisition 1356 Park Street, in the amount of
$65,000 to fund the acquisition and attendant expenses.
Page 5
City of Clearwater
Community Redevelopment Agency Meeting Minutes July 13, 2015
In 2010, the CRA acquired property located at 1359 Cleveland Street for the
purpose of environmental remediation and future redevelopment. In 2014, the
City acquired 14 S. Evergreen Avenue for redevelopment purposes. The
parcel proposed for acquisition is contiguous with both CRA and City parcels
and will square off what is otherwise an irregularly shaped tract. The parcel is
approximately 5,775 sq. ft. and contains a small storage structure that will be
demolished. This acquisition will provide for a total tract of 24,150 sq. ft. (0.55
acres) in the East Gateway District that may be used for future redevelopment
purposes.
City staff conducted an in-house appraisal to determine current market value of the
property as if assembled with adjacent CRA landholdings. Staff's value conclusion is
$9.00/sq. ft. or$51,975.
Purchase price $51,300
Closing Cost $5,00
Prose 1 ESA $2,900
Asbestos Screening 1„600
10% contingency $45,0
Demolition 55.,000
TOTAL $61,750
In addition to the acquisition costs, $3,250 is requested in the CRA project
code for any miscellaneous/ongoing maintenance costs of the site. Funding for
this acquisition will be provided by a transfer of$65,000 from CRA Downtown
Redevelopment line item into a new project code (388-94884), Property
Acquisition 1356 Park Street.
APPROPRIATION CODE AND AMOUNT:
Funding for this acquisition will be provided by a transfer of$65,000 from CRA
Downtown Redevelopment line item into a new project code (388-94884),
Property Acquisition 1356 Park Street. 388-94884 $65,000
Trustee Hock-DiPolito moved to approve the Purchase Contract for
acquisition of real property located at 1356 Park Street, Clearwater,
by the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Clearwater
(CRA), with a purchase price of$51,300 and total expenditures not
to exceed $65,000 including environmental assessments, closing
costs and demolition expenses and ongoing maintenance;
authorize the appropriate officials to execute same, together with
all other instruments required to affect closing; and, approve a
transfer of $65,000 from CRA Project 388-94714, Downtown
Redevelopment, to a new Project 388-94884, Property Acquisition
1356 Park Street, in the amount of$65,000 to fund the acquisition
Page 6
City of Clearwater
Community Redevelopment Agency
Meeting Minutes July 13, 2015
and attendant expenses. The motion was duly seconded and
carried unanimously.
5. Director's Report
CRA Executive Director Rod Irwin thanked those involved in the recent East
Gateway code sweep, which generated results with some of the property
owners.
6. Committee Members to be Heard
Trustee Jonson questioned when the project status report would be
provided.
CRA Executive Director Rod Irwin said the project status report will be
provided at the August 3 CRA meeting. The information will be provided
to the Trustees after July 21, which will include all funds expended, funds
committed to the ULI project, and objective status.
Trustee Jonson said he wants to ensure the minutes are understandable.
Chair Cretekos said the comments made earlier regarding the minutes
were directed for all meetings; Robert's Rules specifies that minutes do
not have to include verbatim reports of what is said or ideas expressed,
only the motions are required.
7. Adjourn
The meeting adjourned at 2:17 p.m.
Attest
City Clerk
City of Clearwater
let) (1(1 (1 CSC kkof
Chair
00 pMEE'�G���i Community Redevelopment Agency
-44/6/.-• QvkrC .�
.`Z�J'•.
O4 t4( Fl1OCkwso
Page 7