Loading...
11/20/1990 - Clearwater Beach Blue Ribbon Task Force . . . MINUTES CLEARWATER BEACH BLUE RIBBON TASK FORCE NOVEMBER 20, 1990 Members Present: Chairman Deegan, Ms. Garris, and Messrs. Doran, Fowler, Gans, Henderson, Keyes, Little, Rosenow, and Seaton Members Excused: Ms. Tiernan, and Messrs. Homer, Martin, Mc Dougall, and Wellborn, Also Present: Planning and Development Director, James M. Polatty, Jr., The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Chairman Deegan in the Boardroom of the Sea Stone Resort. Approval of the minutes for November 7, 1990 was continued until the next meeting on December 5, 1990. The Chairman gave the following subcommittee updates: Beautification Focus Groups. John Doran reported that three focus groups met to discuss the name to be used for the beach architecture and ambiance. Group 1 consisted of both u.S. and European tourists; Group 2 consisted primarily of residents and some commercial people; and Group 3 consisted primarily of commercial people and some residents. The results of the discussion, combined with written feedback which had been received, revealed that the words "tropical" and "seascape" were well liked and that the word "classic" was acceptable, but not as favored as the other two. The focus groups also discussed the general theme, "Clearwater Beach--One Small Place of Enchantment", and although some exception was taken to the word "small", it was considered to be a viable general theme for Clearwater Beach. The subcommittee recommended "tropical seascape" be adopted as the descriptive phrase for the architecture and ambiance of the beach. After some discussion the Task Force tentatively approved the recommendation. Guidelines for Newspaper Dispensers. John Doran reported he had obtained the guidelines prepared by Public Works Director William Baker and distributed copies to the Task Force. Chairman Deegan reminded the group to continue researching the desirability of a toll on the causeway; how to minimize bridge openings; and how to put together parcels for waterfront development. ISSUE FIVE: JOINT EFFORT AT REDEVELOPMENT WITH DOWNTOWN - Phil Henderson and Stephen Fowler Phil Henderson stated they brought in David Carley from the Downtown Development Board and Ken Rosenow from the Task Force as a landowner/businessman on the beach, to brainstorm the issue and they rapidly concluded there was no connection . . . between what downtown is doing what is being done on the beach. He further stated there is not a master plan for the beach right now and downtown is not looking at what the beach is doing, as they are more concerned with how to get downtown going. The suggestion of a using a discount booklet was presented by the subcommittee to the downtown businessmen and was well received. The downtown merchants would publish a booklet containing discounts from their places of business for distribution by the beach businessmen. Mr. Henderson stated their group also met with Jerry Sternstein to get his ideas on how downtown development could tie into the development on the beach. Mr. Sternstein gave them a draft copy of the Hunter study, which is directed to finding out what the possibilities are for downtown. He further reported that Bobby Byrd has been getting options on parcels of land downtown for development. Mr. Henderson stated their group looked at the overall design of what is being proposed for downtown and how this can be tied into the beach. steve Fowler stated he had met with Jerry Sternstein last April and at that time the property being discussed for development was the City Annex site, which is approximately 40 acres. He stated the Eastshore Drive area is about as long but not as wide. The Annex area is approximately 3 or 4 times the size of the beach area. He stated he had gleaned from the Hunter Study all the information pertinent to the beach and downtown and handed out a data sheet containing that information, as well as a scaled down map of the 40 acre site, and a commuter time map (all of which are on file in the Task Force document book). Mr. Fowler stated the Hunter Study revealed that 1) upscale retail activity is increasing; 2) a great deal of the retail dollar in Pinellas County is leaving the county and going to New York, Miami, Atlanta, etc. as wives of businessmen travel with their husbands and spend $10,000 to $15,000 on shopping sprees in those cities; 3) Clearwater merchants feel they can recapture that business by the introduction of a project right here with 250,000 sq. ft. of entertainment and upscale retail, in addition to the 150,000 sq. ft. for a city center. Mr. Fowler emphasized that the tram is the most important link in order for the downtown and the beach to be good neighbors. Mr. Henderson passed out recommendations from the subcommittee suggesting how that center ties into the proposed beach development site. He stated the Task Force has seen the proposal for this area to be developed into a mixed blend of retail and entertainment and they had some recommended changes to that. He stated they tried to present a broad brush of what is being looked at downtown and how the beach can join in with it. He read the following from the Hunter Study: "The downtown was previously a major retail center, but experienced a decline in its retail concentration during the past 10 to 15 years despite the tremendous retail growth which has occurred throughout the county. This analysis is undertaken to identify potential retail development opportunities for downtown Clearwater that can reverse retail decline." The subcommittee suggested the following recommendations: Clearwater Beach Blue Ribbon Task Force 2 November 20, 1990 . . . 1. Emphasize "tram" as major link to make possible Beach/Downtown relationship. 2. Coupon Books for distribution on Beach and Downtown for Downtown and Beach businesses. 3. Reduce amount of "retail" areas and increase "entertainment" in previous subcommittee report, (i.e., change tenant mix). 4. Continue streetscape funded by DDB, from Downtown to Beach to lend a sense of continuity between the two; for example, tram stations on the Beach. 5. Establish major "welcome station" in Downtown to provide a center for information and reservations, with parking terminal for tram rides. 6. Promote continued dialooue and cooperation on common concerns of both Downtown and the Beach. Mr. Fowler stated that Jerry Sternstein was not enthusiastic about the mix of a welcome station with an upscale shopping center because it might generate conflict in traffic. Mr. Deegan suggested the possibility of incorporating a welcome center with the tram stations. In discussion, the Task Force expressed the following: 1) the coupon books should be mutually beneficial to both downtown and the beach; 2) defined entertainment to mean something similar to Rosie O'Grady's at Church Station in Orlando with emphasis on family entertainment; 3) the City should reconsider funding a Tourist Convention Bureau perhaps in conjunction with the Chamber of Commerce; 4) the tram needs reasons to be ridden and if downtown sees advantages for beach people to come downtown, they will provide parking for the tram, and 5) a hotel downtown would also feed the beach by tram. Anne Garris asked Mr. Polatty about property in Tampa that the City owned. Mr. Polatty explained that the City had acquired about 900 acres along Race Track Road which they no longer needed and which they desired to sell to finance the building of a City Hall in Clearwater. He further stated this was begun prior to the Annex development and the two ideas are now merging. The Task Force tentatively approved the above recommendations with the underlined revisions. The Chairman thanked the subcommittee, and stated they had been a good example of what they were recommending by meeting with the downtown folks and it was a major step forward. Anne Garris stated her subcommittee needed two meetings to properly present their report. The group set the additional meeting for December 19, 1990. David Little reported from the subcommittee on traffic stating they had discussed regulation of the bridge openings with Bill Held, Harbormaster, and the Police Department with regard to preventing gridlocks during heavy traffic periods. Clearwater Beach Blue Ribbon Task Force 3 November 20, 1990 . . . He stated for every 5 min. bridge opening, it takes 23 min. to recycle the traffic and get it moving again. Their committee suggested the following recommendation to the Task Force: Ask the City of Clearwater to petition the Coast Guard and DOT to have the bridge opened only on the hour during the peak traffic period from 3:00 to 6:00 p.m., rather than every 20 minutes, during holidays, spring break and weekends. During discussion, Phil Henderson stated having an officer near Maas Bros. regulating the traffic signal is a great aid in getting traffic moving after a bridge opening. The Task Force did not reach a consensus on the recommendation. It was generally felt Clearwater Beach is a recreational area and boaters should not be penalized. Mr. Little then reported with regard to the possibility of a toll on the causeway and stated the subcommittee had not encountered any obstacles in their recommendation of a toll and were still considering this recommendation. Ken Rosenow reported that the toll fees for Sanibel Island are $3.00 per round trip, but island and mainland residents can purchase a one-year pass for $25.00, or a 6-month pass for $15.00. With the pass they then pay fifty cents per trip. He further stated this has been well received by both townspeople and tourists. The Chairman reminded the group the next meeting would be on December 5, 1990 at 7:00 p.m. in the Boardroom of the Sea Stone Resort with the subcommittee on P1anning/zoning/building/FEMA presenting the first half of their report. The meeting was adjourned at 9:00 p.m. (2L v: &o~L- Arthur x. Deegan~I, Chairman Clearwater Beach Blue Ribbon Task Force 4 November 20, 1990