10/17/1990 - Clearwater Beach Blue Ribbon Task Force
.
.
.
MINUTES
CLEARWATER BEACH BLUE RIBBON TASK FORCE
OCTOBER 17, 1990
Members Present:
Chairman Deegan, Ms. Garris, and Messrs. Doran, Henderson, Homer,
Keyes, Martin, McDougall, Seaton and Wellborn
Members Excused:
Ms. Tiernan and Messrs. Fowler, Gans, Little, and Rosenow
Also Present:
James M. Polatty, Jr., Director of Planning and Development; and Rev.
Herbert Freitag
The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Chairman Deegan in the Boardroom of the Sea
Stone Resort.
A motion was made by John Doran, and seconded by Walter Wellborn, to approve the minutes from
the September 25, 1990 meeting. Motion carried unanimously.
The Chairman read a letter (attached) dated October 2 which he had asked John Doran to send to
the City Attorney requesting information with regard to 1) tax incentives to encourage property
owners to make improvements; 2) elimination of private use of public property, e.g., pay phones and
vending machines on sidewalks or right-of-way to the extent the law will allow; and 3) establishment
of design requirements for vending machines and pay phones. Mr. Doran reported he had received
a reply from the City Attorney (letter attached) stating 1) local governments lack the power to grant
tax incentives; 2) news racks may be subject to reasonable time, place and manner restrictions, but
may not be prohibited; and 3) the City does not have design requirements for vending machines and
pay phones and he does not foresee the establishment of an architectural review board. Mr. Galbraith
further stated in his letter that Public Works Director Baker had developed some volunteer guidelines
which are used to bring problem sites to the attention of publishers and distributors. Mr. Doran will
follow up on obtaining the guidelines from Mr. Baker.
Mr. Doran stated in further research he found it is possible to grant an exception to the ad valorem
taxes for economic development. He found that a municipality has the power if approved at
referendum to designate enterprise zones and within the enterprise zones to allow tax rebates for
newly developed land or expansion, but not redevelopment. Mr. Doran stated this is an income tax
rebate and one would have to incorporate to take advantage of it, and that he was not sure it would
be worth doing.
In answers to questions from the task force, Mr. Polatty stated:
1. There are certain state requirements to meet to become an enterprise zone. In order to
receive some state incentives from the state income tax and sales tax, you must show the
establishment of local incentives. He stated most of downtown Clearwater and the North
Greenwood area have enterprise zoning, but it has been found generally throughout Florida
that enterprise zoning does not work.
2. Vending machines for cokes, cigarettes etc. can be regulated quite readily by a City ordinance,
but newspaper racks get into Constitutional amendments and there is more difficulty in
regulating them.
Mr. Deegan stated the task force was more concerned with aesthetics than removal of the vending
machines and pay phones and suggested enforcement of the voluntary guidelines developed by
Public Works Director Baker and the streetscape designs which were recommended by the
subcommittee on beautification.
.
.
.
The Chairman gave the following subcommittee updates:
1 . He stated Anna Stefan had not yet formed focus groups to research a name for the style of
architecture on the beach and encouraged Gordon McDougall and John Doran to follow up
on that.
2. He encouraged the task force to continue researching ideas on incentives for the business
people to become involved in the beautification plans for the beach.
3. He asked the subcommittee on transportation to concentrate on ways the task force could
reach a consensus on whether there should be a toll on the Causeway and how to minimize
bridge openings.
Issue Three: Environment - Pollution was presented by the subcommittee and is on file in the task
force document book. The report was divided into three topics and reported on separately by each
member.
OPENING DUNEDIN PASS AND PROBLEMS WITH STEVENSON'S CREEK - Major T. Martin
Mr. Martin stated he was unable to obtain the date for the hearing on Dunedin Pass. Anne Garris
stated she thought the County had planned to propose an entirely new project in September and that
she would follow up on it and advise the task force if a new date had been set. She stated the
problem is that the DNR will not allow the cut to be made unless there are retaining jetties and while
the Department of Environmental Regulation does not oppose the cut, they will not approve the
jetties.
In discussion Ms. Garris related how aerators were used in Korea to clean up a dirty river in
preparation for the summer Olympics. She stated this was also being done at the Moccasin Lake
Nature Park, and thought it might be something worth researching. Mr. Homer also suggested the
use of artificial reef by individual homeowners in the water around their docks as another way to
help clean the polluted water. While purifying the water was thought to be important, Major Martin
pointed out the main objective was to prevent flooding. It was agreed by the task force that both
issues were equally important and while the storm water runoff should be controlled, it should also
be made as clean as possible. The task force agreed the City should be encouraged to start
secondary water supplies to houses. Mr. Homer reminded the task force that the Land Act states
stormwater runoff must be 90% pure by the year 1992, and that the City is working towards this
now.
The subcommittee suggested the following recommendations be made to the City Commission:
1 . Continue to pursue the opening of Dunedin Pass;
2. Expedite the rehabilitation of Stevenson's Creek to maximize the cleanliness of stormwater
runoff; and
3. Take action to assure sewage treatment of plant effluent and other organic and inorganic
matter discharged into the bay meets established standards, includinG askinG the Countv to
address convertinG seotic tank areas to City sewaGe with soecial emohasis on storm water
runoff areas.
The Task Force tentatively approved the above recommendations with the addition of the underlined
language to No.3.
Clearwater Beach
Blue Ribbon Task Force
2
October 17, 1 990
.
.
.
TRASH REMOVAL AND CLEANING OF CLEARWATER BEACH - Herbert Freitag
Rev. Freitag stated the litter problem lies with the people and not with the way the City is trying to
handle it. He praised the Parks and Recreation Department for the good job they are doing in
removing the trash from the beach. He further stated that sometime ago he and his wife had met
with the Clearwater Beach Association and the Chamber of Commerce Long Range Planning
Committee to find out what was being doing with regard to trash removal and as a result 20
additional trash cans had been put on the beach.
In discussion Anne Garris stated years ago she told Chief Daniels if he would give some hefty littering
fines, she would publicize them, but he had felt that would be spot enforcement. She thought if
word spread that Clearwater Beach enforced the -no littering- law as they do the nno alcoholn law,
they would soon get that reputation and eventually wouldn't have to do much enforcement. Mr.
Wellborn stated littering signs should be placed on the causeway stating the maximum fine for
littering. Ms. Garris stated another way to curb trash would be to prevent the use of glass or straws
on the beach as had been done in North Carolina. She stated it was difficult for the machines to pick
up that kind of litter, so the food establishments had been advised not to use glass or furnish straws
to anyone on the beach.
The subcommittee suggested the following recommendations be made to the City Commission:
1 . Motivate people to throw their trash in trash cans or take it home with them;
2. Increase enforcement of littering laws while also increasing penalties for breaking them; and
3. Increase the number of trash cans on Clearwater Beach for those days when volume is so
heavy that they are filled and some trash of necessity thus winds up on the sand.
The task force tentatively approved the above recommendations and added the following:
4. Institute a litter campaign educating the public; and
5. Train life guards to encourage or remind people to pick up trash.
THE BAY - Jay F. Keyes
Mr. Keyes prefaced his report by stating the bay had deteriorated tremendously in the last 20 years.
He remembered the days when mullet came to spawn you could practically walk on them and when
a bushel of shrimp could be netted in half an hour.
With regard to the boat liveaboards, Mr. Keyes stated they are required to have a holding tank on
board and keep a log of dates the tanks are pumped, which the Harbor Master checks.
The subcommittee suggested the task force make the following recommendations to the City
Commission:
1. Toughen waste water rules for development/redevelopment by using:
a. porous paving in parking lots to soak up water;
b. perforated storm water pipes that leak runoff into the ground;
c. filters inside storm-water pipes; and
Clearwater Beach
Blue Ribbon Task Force
3
October 17, 1 990
.
.
.
d.
underground retention ponds below buildings, especially downtown commercial
buildings;
2. Designate parks and other public lands where storm water can be piped during rains, turning
the lands into wetlands;
3. Widen problem creeks and create retention areas along the run; and
4. Construct a culvert system under the road along Memorial Causeway.
The task force tentatively approved the above recommendations.
Mr. Keyes stated all reference and back-up materials for the entire report will be kept in Don Seaton's
office at the Sea Stone Resort.
The Chairman complimented the subcommittee on their fantastic presentation and commented on
the fact that it was one with which the task force was in complete agreement.
Ms. Garris informed the group that an Environmental Advisory Committee for the City of Clearwater
would be appointed by the City Commission on October 18.
The Chairman reminded the task force the next meeting would be on November 7, 1990, at the Sea
Stone Resort with the subcommittee on market niche/competition/attractions giving their report.
The meeting adjourned at 8:35 p.m.
Arthur X. Deegan II, Ch
Clearwater Beach
Blue Ribbon Task Force
4
October 17, 1 990
.
.
.
john doran
.l.i ,...
October 2, 1990
ATIORNEY AT U\W
662 Mandalay Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 34630
(813) 447-9579
AI Galbraith, Esq.
Clearwater City Attorney
P.O. Box 4748
Clearwater, FL 34618-4748
RECEIVED
u t; r 2 3 1990
PLANNING & URBAN
DEVELOPMENT DEPT.
He: Clearwater Beach Blue Ribbon Task Force
Dear Mr. Galbraith:
OUr s ubcanmit tee on rrheme, Beautification and Landscaping suggested that the Task
Force recarmend, anong other items:
1. a general develcpnent plan for Clearwater Beach including incentives to
encourage property owners to make Lmprovements
2. elimination of private use of public property, e.g. pay phones, vending
machines on sidewalks or right of way, to extent law allows, and
establishing design requirements for all exter ior pay phones and vending
machines
It was suggested that the city could not grant tax incentives to property owners in
consideration of improvements made pursuant to a development plan. We ask for your
counsel on the general question of whether the city may grant tax incentives to
private property owners, and, if so, under what circumstances.
It was also suggested that the city could not prohibit newspaper vending machines
from public property. We ask for your counsel on the question of whether the city
may prohibit vending machines in general, and newspaper vending machines in
particular, from public property.
we also seek your counsel on the question of whether the city may establish design
requirements for exter ior vending machines and pay phones, and under what
circumstances.
we do not require the text of case, ordinance, or statute to which you may refer,
but citations would be appreciated for those to which you do refer.
,-
cc: A. Deegan
'jI~
r:.~~;~~~c,tl ,~'~.~:<i/t ___,'"
C I T Y
OF
CLEARWATER
POST OFFICE BOX 4748
. j. I
I' l"
C LEA R W ATE R, F LOR IDA 3 4 6 1 8 - 4 7 4 8
OHice 01
City Attorney
(813) 462-6760
October 16, 1990
John Doran, Esquire
662 Mandalay Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 34630
Re: Clearwater Beach Blue Ribbon Task Force
Dear Mr. Doran:
In response to your October 2 letter, let me respond to your
various questions as follows:
.
1. Tax incentives. Under the Florida Constitution, all ad
valorem taxation is to be at a uniform rate. Also, local
government generally has only those taxing powers which have been
expressly provided by the Florida Constitution and by statute. For
these reasons, local governments lack the power to grant tax
incentives. The most recent Attorney General's opinion on this
subject was addressed to Dunedin City Attorney John Hubbard on
March 20, 1990. I do not have a complete copy of the opinion, but
the question was whether the City of Dunedin could grant tax
rebates to newly annexed property, and the conclusion was that they
could not. Attorney General Opinion 90-23.
2. Newspaper vending machines--t>rohibi tion. .There have been
a number of cases across t!1eCOU:ltry during 'the past ten years in
which local newsrack regulations were challenged on a variety of
Constitutional grounds, primarily the First Amendment. It is
difficult to summarize the current state of the law in a few words,
but my observation is that the objections to newsracks have been -
based primarily upon aesthetics, and the regulations which survived
judicial review fall short of addressing the aesthetics problem
effectively. The courts are generally finding that news racks may
be subject to reasonable time, place and manner restrictions, but
may not be prohibited.
.
The time, place and manner restrictions approved by the courts have
not appeared to be much better than the voluntary guidelines which
Public Works Director Bill Baker developed several years ago, which
the City has been using successfully to address traffic flow and
public safety considerations. These guidelines have not been
"Equal Employment and Affirmative Action Employer"
. .
.
.
\.
formally adopted, but we have used them to bring problem sites to
the attention of publishers and distributors.
3. Newspaper vendinq machines and pay telephones--desiqn
requirements. I have seen no cases involving design regulations
for pay telephones on public property, but at least one city has
attempted to regulate the design of newsracks. In citv of Lakewood
v. Plain Dealer Publishing Co., 486 U.S. 750, 108 S.ct. 2138
(1988), the city ordinance provided, among other things, for
approval of newsrack design by the city's architectural review
board. The sixth Circuit found, among other things, that the
design approval requirement was invalid due to the lack of express
standards governing newsrack design. The Supreme Court did not
reach that issue, finding instead that the ordinance was invalid
due to the unfettered discretion given to the mayor to approve a
newsrack permit application.
- --- - ~- -- ---
Clearwater has no architectural review board, and my observation
is that we are not likely to create one in the foreseeable future.
The question has been raised from time to time, but has not been
given lengthy consideration. The last city I worked for, Boca
Raton, has had such a board for many years. That board operates
under a thick set of guidelines. (The last I heard, someone was
complaining that all of the new buildings in town were pink.) Even
so, Boca Raton did not regulate the appearance of newsracks on
public property as late as 1985, when I left. There were some
newsracks that complied with someone's idea of a uniform newsrack
design, but I believe they were located on private property.
Please let me know if I can be of further assistance to you.
sincerel
~
M. A. Galbrait ,
city Attorney
MAG: a
2