FLD2015-05016a
�l
p C ear�����
�
MEETING DATE:
AGENDA ITEM:
CASE:
REQUEST:
GENERAL DATA:
Agent... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
Applicant/ Owner ... ..........
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
July 21, 2015
E.1.
FLD2015-05016
Flexible Development approval to permit a 166-room overnight accommodation
use in the Tourist (T) District with a lot area of 1.32 acres; a lot width of 400
feet; a front (north) setback of 15 feet (to building) and zero feet (to pavement), a
side (north) setback of 10 feet (to building), a side (south) setback of 10 feet (to
building) and six feet (to pavement), a front (east) setback of 15 feet (to building
and pavement), a side (east) setback of 10 feet (to building, a front (west)
setback of 10 feet (to building) and zero feet (to pavement); a building height of
100 feet; and a minimum of 199 parking spaces at 1.2 parking spaces per hotel
room, under the provisions of CDC Section 2-803.K; and a two-year
Development Order under the provisions of CDC Section 4-407.
Michael J. Palmer, P.E.; Synergy Civil Engineering, Inc.
Mainstream Partners, VIII, LTD
Location .......................... 405 Coronado Drive; bound by Coronado Drive (west), Hamden Drive (east)
Fifth Street (north) at the intersection Hamden Drive and Bayside Drive.
Property Size .................... 1.32 acres
Future Land Use Plan.....
Zoning . .. ... ... ... ... .. . ... .
Resort Facilities High (RFH)
Tourist (T) District
Special Area Plan .............. Beach by Design (Small Motel District)
Adjacent Zoning.... North: Tourist (T) District ;� • t
South: Tourist (T) District .'�
East: Tourist (T) and Preservation � � `�
Districts _;,, ,, �
West: Tourist (T) District
Existing Land Use.........
Proposed Land Use ... ... .
Parking Garage/Lot and
Overnight Accommodations
Overnight Accommodations
(166 units) with associated
accessory/amenity uses
including commercial space
(retail and/or restaurant) and
an exercise room.
AERIAL MAP
�
' Vl�.t��►1�11�1 Level II Flexible Development Application Review
.. . �. ^E�€�r ^,y.;=. ..
ANALYSIS:
Location and Existing Conditions:
The 1.32-acre subject property is bound by
Coronado Drive (west), Hamden Drive (east)
Fifth Street (north) at the intersection Hamden
Drive and Bayside Drive composed of five
parcels with a frontage of approximately 400
feet along Coronado Drive, 200 feet along Fifth
Street and 175 feet of frontage along Hamden
Drive. The property is within the Tourist (T)
District and the Resort Facilities High (RFH)
Future Land Use Plan (FLUP) classification.
The subject property is also located within the
Small Motel District of Beach by Design.
The site is occupied by a parking lot (recently
constructed) along Fifth Street and the Gulf
Beach Inn (along Coronado Drive) a 22 unit
overnight accommodation use built in 1960
(according to Pinellas County Property
Appraiser records).
The immediate area is characterized by a
variety of uses including overnight
accommodation, retail sales and services,
outdoor recreation and entertainment,
restaurant and attached dwelling uses with
heights ranging from one to 15 stories. The
City's Beach Walk project has been constructed
transforming South Gulfview Boulevard farther
to the west of this site into a winding beachside
promenade with lush landscaping, artistic
touches and clear views to Clearwater's award-
winning beach and the water beyond.
Coronado Drive has also been improved over
the last several years with new sidewalks,
decorative brick edging and details, crosswalks,
lighting and street trees.
Site History:
➢ On July 19, 2005, the Community
Development Board (CDB) approved, with
15 conditions, Case Nos. FLD2005-
02021/TDR2005-03020 to permit attached
dwellings in the Tourist (T) District with an
increase in height to 148 feet as part of a
PLANNING & DEVELOP&IENT
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION
Overnfght ,�' �4z' �ioy�yq .1 -_�. i,
Accommodations ° 348:+ 3� , - ' a
; ��
�/►sr "' �` Parkin8--• r .�+� �� . �_ N:T:S � '
0
ho, t �3E,� ,��w��N� ::
-1 ' �as
Overnight io + �os�
Accommodations = �-+��. ' o r �
N *4 4'� , o a w_
4�1 C 427 � � 42Vi
� Overnight
� — �4�-� `-a�e
,� ' 4p � ; �� Accommodalions
t� 43 's ��I; �1�x27 �
-�',2 ��p�� A30 ����3 �� �0;� i � „ �
� � � ,
�o' o Overnight -
Accommodatioos
�,,. 7
�>
�' AAO �
. hy
EXISTING SURROUNDING USES MAP
Community Development Board — July 21, 2015
FLD2015-05016 — Page 1
� C�\.N�I riall.l Levei II Flexible Develo mentA lication Review PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT
P PP DEVELOPMENT REV�W DMSION
��z���a = � �
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project; a Termination of the status of a nonconformity
(equivalent of 119 hotel units [ 116 hotel units and three dwelling units] where 93 hotel units
are permitted); Preliminary Plat; and a Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2005-03020) of
18 hotel units from 401 Coronado/406 Hamden Drives (donor site) to 405 Coronado Drive
(receiver site — Parcels A, B and C) under the provisions of Sections 4-1402 and 4-140. This
application has expired.
➢ On April 19, 2011, the CDB approved, with six conditions, Case No. FLD2011-02005 to
permit the addition of a Parking Garage and Lot, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C.
This application is considered vested because the parking lot has been constructed.
➢ On September 18, 2014, the City Council approved the allocation of up to 100 units from the
Hotel Density Reserve under Beach by Design (Case No. HDA2013-08006) and adopted a
resolution to the same effect (Res. No. 14-25). The owners proposed to develop the site with
a 166-unit overnight accommodations building with associated accessory/amenity uses
including commercial space, restaurant, meeting rooms, exercise room and the like.
Code Enforcement Analysis:
There are no active Code Compliance cases for the subject property.
Development Proposal:
The proposal is to demolish all structures on the site and redevelop the site with a 166-unit
overnight accommodation use (126 rooms per acre, including the allocation of 100 rooms from
the Hotel Density Reserve). The proposal will also include a variety of accessory uses and
amenities such as a retail, restaurant and exercise facility. The existing structures on site will be
removed with the proposal. The primary component of the application request is a height of 100
feet along with requests for setback reductions for pavement along the north and south sides of
the site. Setbacks to building are all between 10 and 15 feet which, in and of themselves, are
consistent with the development parameters of a Level I Flexible Standard Development. The
reduction in pavement along the south side of the site will accommodate six surface parking
spaces and the reduction in the setback to pavement along the north side of the site along Fifth
Street will accommodate a driveway providing for a drop off area for hotel guests. In addition, a
small plaza/patio will connect the commercial component of the building to the sidewalks along
Coronado Drive and Fifth Street at the northwest corner of the site providing opportunities for
seating and outdoor dining. This feature will be located zero feet from the north and west
property lines. The hotel building will otherwise occupy most of the site. The applicant
anticipates the proposal will create approximately 75 new jobs.
Parking will be accommodated via structured parking (199 spaces minimum) within the first
three floors of the building which will provide at least 1.2 spaces per room. Access to the
parking garage will be via a single driveway along Hamden Drive at the southeast corner of the
site. A one-way drop-off drive yields two driveways at the north side of the site along Fifth
Street. The eastern driveway of this component will also provide a second access point into the
parking garage. A service driveway is provided along the west side of the site along Coronado
Drive.
Community Development Board — July 21, 2015
FLD2015-05016 — Page 2
� C��.Lil f7�l�l Level II Flexible Develo mentA lication Review PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT
P pP DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION
� .: ����>,:;,*,
The proposal includes a tropical modern architecture, which is consistent with and complements
the tropical vernacular envisioned in Beach by Design. The first floor of the hotel building will
include parking spaces, the hotel entry, main lobby, general commercial space and assorted back-
of-house uses. The second and third floors are dedicated to parking. The fourth floor will
contain hotel rooms, administration uses, assorted back of house uses, outdoor swimming pool
and patio area, meeting room, general dining area, an exercise room and buffet area. The noted
the pool and patio area are located at the southwest corner of the building. The fifth through
ninth floors are dedicated to hotel rooms and assorted back of house uses.
As noted, the proposal includes a certain amount of interior accessory space which amounts to
approximately 4,500 square feet constituting approximately four percent of the gross floor area
of the hotel building. Please note that a conflicting figure of 14,490 square feet is provided on
Sheet G 1 which is in error and should be disregarded.
A solid waste component will be located within the loading area within the northwest quadrant
of the building. The dumpster will be rolled out to a staging area along Coronado Drive for
servicing.
The site will include extensive landscaping along all sides of site through the provision of a
variety of plant material including live oak, date and royal palms, silver buttonwood, natal plum,
sea grape and carissa.
The site is designed to be pedestrian-friendly with the provision of a sidewalk seven feet in width
along Coronado Drive, Fifth Street and Hamden Drive. The sidewalk will connect to and match
existing sidewalks adjacent to the site with regard to width, materials, fit and finish. Brick
pavers, stamped paving or some other like technique will be used where the sidewalk crosses a
driveway however, the applicant has not determined the exact methodology to be used yet and
will coordinate with Staff at time of building permit to finalize those details. The commercial
component at the northwest corner of the site will be connected to Coronado Drive and Fifth
Street via a small plaza/patio area.
The proposed site plan and elevations are consistent with those conceptual site plans and
elevations as submitted to and approved by City Council as part of HDA2013-12006.
The applicant is requesting a two-year development order due to market conditions. Section 4-
407 specifies that an application for a building permit must be submitted within one year of the
date the CDB approves the project, unless otherwise specified under this approval.
Special Area Plan:
Beach by Design: Small Motel District:
The City has demonstrated through the creation of Beach by Design and subsequent amendments
to this plan that it recognizes the need for pedestrian-friendly development in order to create a
vibrant active resort and waterfront destination serving tourists and locals alike. It is understood
that a broad range of uses including retail sales and service, hotels and motels and restaurants
contribute to the creation of the unique character and atmosphere that is Clearwater Beach. The
vision of the Small Motel District of Beach by Design contemplates that the existing
Community Development Board — July 21, 2015
FLD2015-05016 — Page 3
' Vl�� I�l��ll.l Level II Flexible Development Application Review PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION
� . . . �YI� "�:�. �
improvements in the Small Motel District will be sustained over time. Although the existing
improvements may not represent the theoretical "highest and best" use of this area, the relatively
good condition of most buildings and the economic value of the existing improvements make it
difficult, if not impossible, to anticipate significant land assembly, demolition and new
development. This development would constitute a consolidation of land with new construction
and will further the trend of quality redevelopment andlor improvements of properties along
South Gulfview Boulevard within the area including the Harborview Grande, the Entrada and
Shephard's.
Beach by Design: Section VII. Design Guidelines:
Beach by Design provides that the implementation of the document involves more than
community redevelopment initiatives, it also involves private development and redevelopment
that conforms to design objectives and principles established in Beach by Design. These
objectives and principles will help the City promote safety, encourage cleanliness, and provide a
comfortable environment. It should be noted that any issue not addressed in the Design
Guidelines shall be governed by the requirements of the CDC. Furthertnore, the Design
Guidelines are intended to be administered in a flexible manner to achieve the highest quality
built environment for Clearwater Beach.
Section A specifically addresses the issue of density. In short, Beach by Design supports an
increase in density through Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) and/or allocation of units
from the Hotel Density Reserve. The proposal includes 166 overnight accommodation units
including 100 units allocated from the Reserve. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this
provision.
Section B specifically addresses height and floorplate size and is delineated in three subsections.
Section B.1 provides that a height of up to 150 feet may be permitted where additional
density is allocated to the development either by TDRs, or via the Destination Resort Density
Pool pursuant to the CRD designation, or via the Hotel Density Reserve where the subject
property is located between South Gulfview Boulevard and the Gulf of Mexico or on the
west side of Coronado Drive. Otherwise, height is governed by the specific Beach by Design
district or, lacking such direction, the CDC. While the property has been augmented through
units allocated from the Reserve the proposed building is not within the specified area where
height over 100 feet is permitted; the proposal provides for a building 100 feet in height.
Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this provision.
Section B.2 requires that portions of any structures which exceed 100 feet are spaced at least
100 feet apart. This section also includes overall separation requirements for structures over
100 feet in height as two options: (1) no more than two structures which exceed 100 feet
within 500 feet; or (2) no more than four structures which exceed 100 feet within 800 feet.
The proposal provides for a building which does not exceed 100 feet in height. Therefore,
this criterion is not applicable to the proposal.
Section B.3 provides that the floorplate of any portion of a building that exceeds 45 feet in
height is limited as follows:
Community Development Board — July 21, 2015
FLD2015-05016 — Page 4
� C��.[11 TT�I�.l Level II Flexible Development Application Review PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION
� . °:��5'dCd v�� ..: . . .
a) Between 45 feet and 100 feet the floorplate will be no greater than 25,000 square feet
except for parking structures open to the public; and
b) Between 100 feet and 150 feet, the floorplate will be no greater than 10,000 square
feet; and
c) Deviations to the above floorplate requirements may be approved provided the mass
and scale of the design creates a tiered effect and complies with the maximum
building envelop allowance above 45 feet as described in Section C. 1.4 of the Design
Guidelines.
The plate between 45 feet and 100 feet is approximately 17,880 square feet which is less
than the prescribed m�imum 25,000 square feet. In addition, the building does not
exceed 100 feet in height. Therefore, this section is supported by the proposal.
Section C addresses issues relating to design, scale and building mass. These topics are
quantified in six parts as follows:
Section C.1 requires buildings with a footprint of greater than 5,000 square feet or a single
dimension greater than 100 feet to be constructed so that no more than two of the three
building dimensions in the vertical or horizontal planes are equal in length. The proposed
building footprint is 36,700 square feet. The applicant has provided (Sheet A2_2) that no
two building dimensions are equal in length. Therefore, this provision is supported by the
proposal.
Section C.2 requires no plane or elevation to continue uninterrupted for greater than 100 feet
without an offset of more than five feet. There is one instance where a building fa�ade
continues for more than 100 feet (140 feet) along the side (east) property line. This one
deviation from the Design Guidelines has been deemed to be warranted by Staff for several
reasons. First, the site, while physically large at over one acre, is odd-shaped and wraps
around other properties. This leaves little room to effectively and efficiently provide
structured parking. The design of the building minimizes the height of the parking structures
at only three floors while aesthetically focusing the attention of the tower potion of the
structure. The shape and dimensions of the site combined the applicant's desire to limit the
height of the parking decks have dictated the length of the ramping component. This length
results in the subject fa�ade extending for 140 feet. Second, while not meeting the letter of
this section this fa�ade is effectively hidden from views from offsite by the existing
development on the adjacent properties to the east. Even in the event that these existing
buildings are removed it is highly likely that a new building will be built in their place which
will also screen this fa�ade. Staff believes that this is sort of minor deviation supported by
the opening statement of the Guidelines which provides that the Guidelines are intended to be
administered in a flexible manner. Otherwise, no portion of any other building fa�ade
continues for more than 100 feet in length with the single longest fa�ade extending 88 feet
(Sheet A2_2). Therefore, this provision is supported by the proposal.
Section C.3 requires at least 60 percent of any elevation (with elevation being defined as that
portion of a building that is visible from a particular point outside the parcel proposed for
development) to be covered with windows or architectural decoration. The application
indicates compliance with this requirement using windows, balconies and azchitectural
Community Development Board — July 21, 2015
FLD2015-05016 — Page 5
' Cl�.ta� f1�l�l Level II Flexible Development Application Review PL`wr�n�G& nE`�L°Pa'¢NT
° . _.��=.,� _. .
DEVELOPIvtENT REVIEW DIVISION
details including decorative grilles, stucco reveals and similar detailing on all facades.
Coverage is between 60 and 62 percent of any given fa�ade (Sheets AS_lb and 2b).
Therefore, this provision is supported by the proposal.
Section C.4 provides that no more than 60 percent of the theoretical m�imum building
envelope located above 45 feet will be occupied by a building. The applicant has
demonstrated that the overall building mass between 45 and 100 feet constitutes
approximately 44 percent of the theoretical maximum building envelope. Therefore, this
provision is supported by the proposal.
Section C.S requires that the height and mass of buildings will be correlated to: (1) the
dimensional aspects of the parcel proposed for development and (2) adjacent public spaces
such as streets and parks. The adjacent rights-of-way are 60 feet in width. The portion of the
building at the fourth floor steps back in accordance with Section D.3 of these Design
Guidelines. Therefore, this provision is supported by the proposal.
Section C.6 permits buildings to be designed for a vertical or horizontal mix of permitted
uses. The proposal includes overnight accommodations (with assorted interior
accessory/amenity uses). Therefore, this provision is supported by the proposal.
Section D addresses the issues of sidewalk widths, setbacks and stepbacks. These topics are
quantified in three parts as follows:
Section D.1 provides that the distances from structures to the edge of the right-of-way should
be 15 feet along arterials, and 12 feet along local streets. While the prescribed distances are
optimal, a 10 foot pedestrian path is seen as key to establishing a pedestrian-friendly place in
the nonresidential environment. As such, building setbacks less than that as suggested are
contemplated in that arcades may be constructed in the public space, but may not narrow the
pedestrian path to less than 10 feet. In addition, decorative awnings and arcades and public
balconies may extend into the public space and even into the right-of-way (provided they do
not obstruct vehicular traffic). Outdoor cafe tables are also permitted in the public space,
subject to the requirements in Section H, Sidewalks. The proposal provides a building
setback of between 10 and 15 feet along Coronado Drive and 15 feet along Hamden Drive
and Fifth Street. It should be noted that significant portions of the building are at least 15
feet from the front (west) property line along Coronado Drive and the average setback is 17
feet. The portions of the building which are 10 feet from this property line are limited to a
few segments as the building follows the curve of Coronado Drive. The site is designed to be
pedestrian-friendly with the provision of a sidewalk seven feet wide along Coronado Drive,
Fifth Street and Hamden Drive. Existing sidewalks will be repaired and replaced as needed
and will tie into and match the existing sidewalks adjacent to the site with regard to size, fit,
finish and materials. Therefore, this Guideline is met by this proposal.
Section D.2 provides that except for the side and rear setbacks set forth elsewhere in Beach
by Design, no side or rear setback lines are recommended, except as may be required to
comply with the City's Fire Code. The proposal includes side (north, south and east)
setbacks of 10 feet (to building) and a side (south) setback of six feet (to pavement).
Therefore, this Guideline is met by this proposal.
Community Development Board — July 21, 2015
FLD2015-OSOl6 — Page 6
' Cl�.tfl ��l�l Level II Flexible Development Application Review PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION
Section D.3 addresses setbacks and stepbacks along Coronado and Hamden Drives.
Buildings constructed with a front setback of 15 feet or more shall stepback with a minimum
depth of 15 feet from the setback line at a height not more than 25 feet. Buildings
constructed with a front setback greater than or equal to 10 feet and less than 15 feet shall
stepback at a height not more than 20 feet. The required stepback/ setback ratio is 1.5 feet for
every one foot reduction in setback in addition to the minimum stepback of 15 feet.
Stepbacks must occur for at least 75 percent of the building width. The proposal is located
along Coronado and Hamden Drives. The building includes a setback of 15 feet along the
entire length of Hamden Drive and provides a stepback of at least 15 feet at 20 feet in height
for 100 percent of the building frontage. The building comes to within 10 feet of the
property line along Coronado Drive. Therefore, the required stepback is 22.5 feet at a height
20 feet. The proposal includes a stepback of at least 22.5 feet along 76 percent of the
building at a height of 20 feet. The portion of the building housing the garage component is
less than 35 feet in height and requires a 20 foot stepback and a height of 20 feet which is
provided by the proposal (Sheets A2_Sc and AS_4). Therefore this guideline is met by this
proposal.
Section E addresses issues of street-level facades and the incorporation of human-scale features
into the facades of buildings in three parts.
Section E.1 requires that at least 60 percent of the street level facades (the portion of the
building within 12 feet of grade) of buildings used for nonresidential purposes which abut a
public street or pedestrian access way, will include windows or doors that allow pedestrians
to see into the building, or landscaped or hardscaped courtyard or plazas, where street level
facades are set back at least 15 feet from the edge of the sidewalk and the area between the
sidewalk and the facade is a landscaped or hardscaped courtyard or plaza. In addition
parking structures should utilize architectural details and design elements such as false
recessed windows, arches, planter boxes, metal grillwork, etc. instead of transparent
alternatives. When a parking garage abuts a public road or other public place, it will be
designed such that the function of the building is not readily apparent except at points of
ingress and egress.
The proposed building is setback between 10 and 15 feet along all street frontages.
Landscaping, outdoor seating and/or storefronts axe provided along all street frontages. The
proposal includes a modern, streamlined building design with an extensive use of glass and
balconies which mitigates the bulk of the building. The parking structure component of the
hotel building will include the use of the same materials as the hotel building and will echo
the pattern of balconies and openings of the hotel. Therefore, this Guideline is met by this
proposal.
Section E.2 provides that window coverings, and other opaque materials may cover no more
than 10 percent of the area of any street-level window in a nonresidential building that fronts
on a public right-of-way. While this is more of an operationally-related requirement, the
applicant has committed to meet this provision. Therefore, this Guideline is met by this
proposal.
Community Development Board — July 2l , 2015
FLD2015-05016 — Page 7
Y C1�.N1 T1'LI�LI.� Level II Flexible Develo ment A lication Review PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
P pP DEVELOPMENTREVIEWDMSION
6 w��=;a.
Section E.3 requires that building entrances should be aesthetically inviting and easily
identified. The entrances to the building are generous in size, well-detailed and easily
identified. Most of the building entrances are consolidated at the north end of the building
with the main lobby accessed from Fifth Street and the commercial component from
Coronado Drive and Fifth Street. Overhangs delineate the entrances to the building on the
north and west facades of the building at Coronado Drive and Fifth Street. Therefore, this
Guideline is met by this proposal.
Section E.4 recommends the use of awnings and other structures that offer pedestrians cover
from the elements especially at entryways. The proposal includes cantilevered awnings and
canopies along Coronado Drive and Fifth Street over the hotel entry and accessory area
facades which serve to identify entrances. Therefore, this Guideline is met by this proposal.
Section F addresses issues related to parking areas. Parking is addressed via structured parking
located on the first three floors of the proposed building and the entrances will be well-
delineated. The hotel parking garage structure is integrated into the design of the building via
the use of openings which mimic the pattern of windows and balconies of the hotel component.
In addition screening will also be employed along sections of the fa�ade fronting the garage
along the east and west. In addition, the fa�ade of the fourth floor is stepped back 15 feet.
Therefore, this Guideline is met by this proposal.
Section G addresses issues related to signage. A sign package has not been included with the
submittal. Any proposed signage will be required to meet the requirements of this section of
Beach by Design and any applicable portions of the Community Development Code.
Section H addresses issues related to sidewalks (also addressed in part by Section D, above) and
provides that all sidewalks along arterials and retail streets should be at least 10 feet in width.
The proposal includes a sidewalk seven feet in width along Coronado Drive, Fifth Street and
Hamden Drive which will match the existing sidewalks adjacent to the site. The sidewalks will
tie into existing sidewalks matching with regard to fit, finish and materials. Therefore, this
Guideline is met by this proposal.
Section I addresses issues related to street furniture and bicycle racks. Benches and trash cans
are proposed along Coronado Drive. The applicant will coordinate with City Staff with regard to
the placement and installation methodology for any street furniture which may be proposed at
time of permit submittal. Therefore, this Guideline is met by this proposal.
Section J addresses issues related to street lighting. Street lighting is not proposed with this
development. Therefore, this section is not applicable to the proposal.
Section K addresses issues related to fountains. Fountains and/or other water features are not
proposed. Therefore this Guideline is not applicable to the proposal.
Section L addresses issues related to materials and colors. Finish materials and building colors
are required to reflect Florida or coastal vernacular themes. The proposed hotel building has a
distinctive contemporary design that will make it an attractive landmark at this location. The
building will be painted white with light blue/grey railings and detailing. While the applicant
Community Development Board — July 21, 2015
FLD2015-05016 — Page 8
° Clearwater Level II Flexible Develo ment A lication Review PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
p pp DEVELOPMENTREVIEWDIVISION
� �;:��
may adjust the color scheme any such adjustment would require Staff review and approval and
must meet the requirements of this portion of the Design Guidelines. The proposed color scheme
and material schedule as submitted meets the requirements of this section.
Comprehensive Plan:
The proposal is supported by applicable various Goals, Objectives and/or Policies of the City's
Comprehensive Plan as follows:
Future Land Use Plan Element:
Policy A.1.2.1 - The Ciry shall require new or redeveloped overnight accommodations uses
located within the City's coastal storm area to have a hurricane evacuation plan, approved by
the City, for all guests. This plan shall require the commencement of evacuation of hotel guests
as soon as a hurricane watch is posted for the City.
A Hurricane Evacuation Plan will be submitted to and approved by the City prior to the issuance
of any permits. Therefore, the proposal will support this Policy
Policy A.3.2.1 - All new development or redevelopment of property within the City of Cleanvater
shall meet all landscape requirements of the Community Development Code.
The proposal, as discussed, meets the requirements of the CDC by providing landscaping along
all sides of the site in excess of CDC requirements and supports this Policy.
Goal A.S - The city of Clearwater shall identify and utilize a cirywide Design structure
comprised of a hierarchy of places and linkages. The citywide design structure will serve as a
guide to development and land use decisions while protecting those elements that make the ciry
uniquely Clearwater.
Objective A. S.1 — Establish the Hierarchy of Places as shown on Map A-14.
Policy A. 5.1.1 - Identify Activity Centers: high intensity, high-density multi-use areas designated
as appropriate for intensive growth and routinely provide service to a signifacant number of
citizens of more than one county. Activity centers are proximate and accessible to interstate or
major arterial roadways, and are composed of multiple destination points, landmarks and
neighborhood centers and character features.
The subject site is located within an Activity Center identified on Map A-14 in the FLUE of the
City's Comprehensive Plan where the proposal includes a high-intensity, high density
development. Therefore, the proposal will support this Goal, Objective and Policy.
Objective A.5.5 - Promote high quality design standards that support Clearwater's image and
contribute to its identiry.
The proposal includes the redevelopment of a lot currently used as a parking lot with 166 new
hotel units. The proposal includes a new attractive building which meets the requirements of the
Design Guidelines of Beach by Design, is supported by the vision of the Small Motel District
and supports this Objective.
Policy A. S. S.1 Development should be designed to maintain and support the existing or
envisioned character of the neighborhood.
Community Development Board — July 21, 2015
FLD2015-05016 — Page 9
° Clearwater Level II Flexible Develo ment A lication Review PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
p pp DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION
�..x .
As mentioned above, the proposal is consistent with the vision of Beach by Design, the Small
Motel District and the Design Guidelines and supports this Policy.
Objective A.6.1 - The redevelopment of blighted, substandard, inefficient and/or obsolete areas
shall be a high priority and promoted through the implementation of redevelopment and special
area plans, the construction of catalytic private projects, city investment, and continued
emphasis on property maintenance standards.
In adopting Beach by Design the City recognized that large portions of the Beach could be
classified as blighted, substandard and suffered from "obsolescence and age". One of the goals
of Beach by Design is to reverse this trend of disinvestment. This goal is well on the way to
being met (perhaps even exceeded) in many areas of the Beach. The Small Motel District is one
area that has not seen as much redevelopment activity with the exception of Brightwater Drive.
The proposed hotel should be seen as an important component in fulfilling the vision of the
Small Motel District and one more step in the revitalization of the Beach and supports this
Objective.
Policy A.6.1.2 - Renewal of the beach tourist district shall be encouraged through the
establishment of distinct districts within Clearwater Beach, the establishment of a limited densiry
pool of additional hotel rooms to be used in specified geographic areas of Clearwater Beach,
enhancement of public rights-of-way, the vacation of public rights-of-way when appropriate,
transportation improvements, inter-beach and intra-beach transit, transfer of development rights
and the use of design guidelines, pursuant to Beach by Design: A Preliminary Design for
Clearwater Beach and Design Guidelines.
As explored previously in this document, the site was the subject of an allocation of hotel units
from the Reserve which allows for a total of 166 hotel units. The redevelopment of this parcel
with a hotel will play an important role in the renewal and revitalization of the Beach.
Therefore, the proposal supports this Policy.
Objective A.6.6 - Tourism is a substantial element of the City's economic base and as such the
City shall continue to support the maintenance and enhancement of this important economic
sector.
Policy A.6.6.1 - The City supports and encourages the continued development and
redevelopment of overnight accommodation uses.
The proposed redevelopment includes an overnight accommodation use which will serve tourists
and locals alike contributing to a vibrant successful resort destination and supports this Objective
and Policy.
Policy A.6.8.3 - Where appropriate, development shall provide a sense of pedestrian scale on
streets through minimal,front setbacks, similar building heights, street trees and proportionality
of building heights to street widths.
The proposal includes a new overnight accommodation use with an overall height of 100 feet.
However, this height is mitigated in several ways:
1. The bulk of the building is setback between 15 and 30 feet from any front property line with
the bulk of the building above the fourth floor consolidated at the north end of the property;
2. Lush landscaping will be provided along all sides of the site;
Community Development Board — July 21, 2015
FLD2015-05016 — Page 10
: Clearwater �evel II Flexible Develo ment A lication Review PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
P PP DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION
� , r^� �. �,�
3. The build-to line along all adjacent streets will match existing development in the area
combined with the provision of active storefronts and the main hotel lobby along Coronado
Drive and Fifth Street complete with the provision of opportunities for outdoor seating and
dining will all contribute to an active street life; and
4. A sidewalk seven feet in width along Coronado Drive, Fifth Street and Hamden Drive.
The overall effect of the proposal will pedestrian-scale consistent with the goals and vision of
Beach by Design and the Small Motel District and supports this Policy.
Community Development Code:
The proposal is supported by the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this
Code as follows:
Section 1-103.B.1. Allowing properry owners to enhance the value of their properry through
innovative and creative redevelopment.
The property owner will redevelop the property with a new attractive building, a vibrant use
(overnight accommodations with accessory amenities including a limited commercial space, an
exercise room, meeting space and dining area) and will contribute to the public space with lush
landscaping, a modest plaza at the northwest corner of the site and sidewalks seven feet in width
along all adjacent streets. The development is considered innovative by the incorporation of
units allocated from the Reserve. Therefore, the proposal supports this CDC Section.
Section 1-103.B.2. Ensuring that development and redevelopment will not have a negative
impact on the value of surrounding properties and wherever practicable promoting development
and redevelopment which will enhance the value of surrounding properties.
Surrounding properties are generally developed with a myriad of uses indicative of a tourist
destination including overnight accommodations, retail sales and services, bars, nightclubs,
outdoor recreation and entertainment, restaurants and attached dwellings. The proposed hotel
will constitute an appropriate use for the neighborhood and is a targeted desired use within the
Small Motel District of Beach by Design. Surrounding properties will be enhanced through the
addition of uses which will contribute to an active and vibrant street life. Therefore, the proposal
supports this CDC Section.
Section 1-103.B.3. Strengthening the city's economy and increasing its tax base as a whole.
The proposal includes the redevelopment of a parking lot in one of the more valuable areas of the
City vis-a-vis tourism with a hotel. The new hotel is expected to create approximately 75 new
jobs and will positively contributing to the CiTy's economy and its tax base. Therefore, the
proposal supports this CDC Section.
Section 1-103. D. It is the further purpose of this Development Code to make the beautification of
the city a matter of the highest priority and to require that existing and future uses and structures
in the ciry are attractive and well-maintained to the mcrximum extent permitted by law.
The proposal includes a new attractive building characterized by a modern style and crisp, clean
lines. In addition, this proposal provides landscaping along all sides of the site. The landscape
design incorporates plant material that is native and/or naturalized and salt tolerant, while
providing visual interest. Therefore, the proposal supports this CDC Section.
Community Development Board — July 21, 2015
FLD2015-05016 — Page l 1
aCl\.(�1 17[il��l Level II Flexible DevelopmentApplication Review PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT
� . ... �tl�K?"�:. . . . . . . . . .
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DMSION
Section 1-103. E. S. Preserve the natural resources and aesthetic character of the community for
both the resident and tourist population consistent with the city's economic underpinnings.
The proposal will support both the resident and tourist populations with an attractive new hotel
providing a seamless connection to the Beach Walk District farther to the west and the more
residential areas to the east. The proposal will be consistent with the desired form and function
of the Small Motel District of Beach by Design and meets the Design Guidelines of that
document. Therefore, the proposal supports this CDC Section.
Section 2-401.1 Intent of the T District and RFHFLUP classification.
The CDC provides that it is the intent of the T District that development be consistent with the
Countywide Future Land Use Plan as required by state law. The uses and development potential
of a parcel of land within the T District shall be determined by the standards found in this
Development Code as well as the Countywide Future Land Use Designation of the property,
including any acreage or floor area restrictions set forth in the Rules Concerning the
Administration of the Countywide Future Land Use Plan, as amended from time to time. For
those parcels within the T District that have an area within the boundaries of and governed by a
special area plan approved by the city council and the countywide planning authority, maximum
development potential shall be as set forth for each classification of use and location in the
approved plan.
Section 2.3.3.4.6 of the Countywide Plan Rules provides that the purpose of the RFH FLUP
classification is to depict those areas of the County that are now developed, or appropriate to be
developed, with high density residential and resort, tourist facility uses, and to recognize such
areas as well-suited for the combination of residential and temporary lodging use consistent with
their location, surrounding uses, transportation facilities and natural resource characteristics of
such areas.
The site is proposed to be developed with a hotel which is a use permitted by the RFH FLUP
classification.
Development Parameters:
Density:
Pursuant to the Countywide Plan Rules and CDC Section 2-801.1, the maximum density for
properties with a designation of Resort Facilities High is 50 overnight accommodation units per
acre. The otherwise permitted density of 50 units per acre yields 66 units.
On September 18, 2014, the City Council approved the allocation of up to 100 units from the
Hotel Density Reserve under Beach by Design (Case No. HDA2013-08006) and adopted a
resolution to the same effect (Res. No. 14-25). The proposal includes 166 hotel rooms consistent
with HDA2013-08006.
Impervious Surface Ratio (ISRZ
Pursuant to the Countywide Plan Rules and CDC Section 2-801.1, the maximum allowable ISR
is 0.95. The proposed ISR is 0.80, which is consistent with the Plan and this Code provision.
Community Development Board — July 21, 2015
FLD2015-05016 — Page 12
' vi�� 17�1��1 Level II Flexible Development Application Review PLnrrNUVG � nEVELOrMExr
� . .. a3'��,:.r . .
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION
Minimum Lot Area and Width:
Pursuant to CDC Table 2-803, the minimum required lot area and width for Overnight
Accommodations is between 10,000 and 20,000 square feet and between 100 and 150 feet,
respectively. The subject property is 57,964 square feet in area and approximately 400 feet wide.
The proposal is consistent with these Code provisions.
Minimum Setbacks:
Pursuant to CDC Table 2-803, the minimum required setbacks may be reduced to zero feet. The
proposal includes a front (north) setback of 15 feet (to building) and zero feet (to pavement), a
side (north) setback of 10 feet (to building), a side (south) setback of 10 feet (to building) and six
feet (to pavement), a front (east) setback of 15 feet (to building and pavement), a side (east)
setback of 10 feet (to building, a front (west) setback of 10 feet (to building) and zero feet (to
pavement). The proposal is consistent with these Code provisions.
M�imum Buildin Hei h�t�
Pursuant to CDC Table 2-803, the maximum permitted height for Overnight Accommodations is
100 feet. Please note that height is measured from the point from which minimum floor
elevations in flood prone areas have been established by law to the highest finished roof surface
in the case of a building with a flat roof. The proposed building height of 100 feet is consistent
with this CDC section.
Minimum Off-street Parkin�•
Pursuant to Table 2-803 parking for Overnight Accommodations is 1.2 spaces per unit with the
proposed 166-room hotel requiring and minimum of 199 spaces where at least 199 spaces are
provided. The parking garage must comply with the Building Code and have a vertical clear
height for all parking garage levels of not less than seven feet including the entrance and exit.
This clear height includes any structural beams, fre sprinkler pipes and heads, electrical conduits
and lighting, drainage pipes and any other building elements. The proposal is therefore
consistent with the Code provisions of Article 2 Division 8 and Beach by Design.
Mechanical E�uipment:
Pursuant to CDC Sections 3-201.D.1 and 3-903.I, all outside mechanical equipment must be
screened so as not to be visible from public streets and/or abutting properties. Mechanical
equipment will be located on top of and within the building. The equipment on the roof area will
be adequately screened from view from adjacent properties and rights-of-way by solid screening.
This screening of the mechanical equipment will also be reviewed at time of the building permit
submission.
Si�ht Visibilit Trian les•
Pursuant to CDC Section 3-904.A, to minimize hazards at the intersection of streets and/or
driveways, no structures or landscaping may be installed which will obstruct views at a level
between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade within 20-foot sight visibility
triangles. This proposal does not propose any structures within the required sight visibility
triangles and landscaping within them will be limited to groundcovers and low shrubs,
complying with this provision. This proposal has been reviewed by the City's Traffic
Engineering Department and been found to be acceptable. Landscaping located within the sight
visibility triangles will need to be maintained to meet the Code requirements.
Community Development Board — July 21, 2015
FLD2015-05016 — Page 13
' C�L�1 ��ll.� Level II Flexible Development Application Review PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
- DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION
U a.� .
Utilities:
Pursuant to CDC Section 3-912, for development that does not involve a subdivision, all utilities
including individual distribution lines must be installed underground unless such undergrounding
is not practicable. There are limited overhead utility lines along the north side of the site
extending southward onto the site from 5�'. All existing overhead utilities will be placed
underground.
Landscapin�:
Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.D, there are no perimeter buffers required in the Tourist District
for this site. In addition, surface parking areas in excess of 4,000 square feet are required to
provide interior landscape area. The proposal includes surface parking of less than 4,000 square
feet. Therefore, interior landscaping is not required although a buffer three feet in width is
required. The proposal includes perimeter landscape buffers along all sides of the site except
along Fifth Street. The landscape design incorporates plant material that is native and/or
naturalized and salt tolerant, while providing visual interest. The pedestrian scale along Coronado
and Hamden Drives and Fifth Street will be enhanced with palms, accent shrubs and dense
groundcover beds.
Solid Waste:
A solid waste component will be located within the loading area within the northwest corner of
the building. The dumpster will be rolled out to a staging area along Coronado Drive for
servicing. The proposal has been found to be acceptable by the City's Solid Waste Department.
Si�na�e�.
The proposal does not include a signage package at this time. All signage will be required to
meet the applicable portions of the Community Development Code and the Design Guidelines of
Beach by Design.
Compliance with General Applicability Standards:
The proposal supports the General Applicability requirements of this Code as follows:
Section 3-914.A.1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk;
coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
The proposal includes a 166-unit hotel within a nine-story building. The proposed building
includes a contemporary design that will make it an attractive landmark at this location. The
subject site is surrounded by a myriad of uses indicative of a tourist destination including
overnight accommodations, retail sales and services, bars, nightclubs, outdoor recreation and
entertainment, restaurants and attached dwellings. The proposed hotel development will
constitute an appropriate use for the neighborhood and is a targeted desired use within the Small
Motel District of Beach by Design. The proposal includes lush landscaping which exceeds the
intent of the CDC and will complement and enhance surrounding properties. The immediate
vicinity is typified by buildings between one and 15 floors. Therefore, the proposal supports this
Code section.
Community Development Board — July 21, 2015
FLD2015-05016 — Page 14
� C1�.L�1 1'1'�l�l Level II Flexible Develo ment A lication Review PLn�[N� & nEVELOrMENr
p PP DEVELOPMENT REV�W DIVISION
u..F , ... ..
Section 3-914.A.2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and
use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof.
The proposal is, as discussed in relation to CDC Section 3-914.A.1, above, consistent with the
character of adjacent properties and with the intent and vision of Beach by Design, the Small
Motel District and the Design Guidelines. The applicant has shown through substantial
competent evidence that the proposal is similar in nature vis-a-vis form and function to adjacent
and nearby properties. The proposal will not impair the value of adjacent properties nor prevent
or discourage their redevelopment. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section.
Section 3-914.A.3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of
persons residing or working in the neighborhood.
The proposal will likely have no effect, negative or otherwise, on the health or safety of persons
residing or working in the neighborhood. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC
Section.
Section 3-914.A.4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
The proposal has been designed to have a minimal effect on traffic congestion. Naturally, the
development of a 166-unit hotel will increase the amount of traffic in the area. However, this
expected increase in traffic has been mitigated with ample space for vehicle stacking on site and
adequate access into the parking garage component of the development. Therefore, the proposal
is consistent with this CDC Section.
Section 3-914.A.5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the
immediate viciniry.
As previously discussed, the community character consists primarily of a variety of uses
including attached dwellings, outdoor recreation and entertainment, retail sales and service,
hoteis and motels and restaurants within multi-story attached dwellings between one and 15
stories. The modern architectural style of the building combined with lush landscaping will
complement and enhance adjacent properties. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this
CDC Section.
Section 3-914.A.6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including
visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties.
The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse visual and acoustic impacts on
adjacent properties. This is accomplished by locating solid waste facilities within the building
and by locating the outdoor pool and patio on the west side of the building away from nearby
residential uses to the east. There should be no olfactory impacts of any kind. Therefore, the
proposal is consistent with this CDC Section.
Compliance with Flexibility Criteria:
The proposal supports the specific Overnight Accommodation criteria pursuant to CDC Section
2-803.K as follows:
1. With the exception of those properties located on Clearwater Beach, the parcel proposed for
development shall front on but shall not involve direct access to a major arterial street unless
no other means of access would be possible.
Community Development Board — July 21, 2015
FLD2015-05016 — Page 15
Y Cl�fU �[Lll.l Level II Flexible Development Application Review PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
. .. . . . �z�.� . ..
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION
The parcel proposed for development is located on Clearwater Beach therefore; this criterion
is not strictly applicable to the application.
2. Height: The increased height results in an improved site plan and/or improved design and
appearance.
The site is the recipient of 100 units from the Reserve. It is generally understood that a
viable overnight accommodation project on the Beach requires additional density and, in turn
certain amounts of flexibility with regard to setbacks, height and other development
parameters. The requested increase in height to 100 feet is mitigated by building stepbacks
and such height is anticipated in this area of Beach by Design for buildings which meet the
requirements of the Design Guidelines (which this project has been adjudged to have met as
explored in detail elsewhere in this report) and which have acquired additional density
through mechanisms such as the Reserve. For example the bulk of the building steps back at
the fourth floor and is consolidated at the north side of the site. In addition, a variety of
pedestrian-scaled details are included along all street-facing facades but especially at the
northwest corner of the site at the intersection of Coronado a Drive and Fifth Street and
include awnings, plaza/patio space and an extensive use of windows In fact, one of the
strategies of Beach by Design is to "optimize project densities" on the Beach. In short, the
number of units directly affects the form of the building vis-a-vis height. In order to create a
viable hotel with the number of proposed units the requested level of flexibility is needed.
As such, the proposal is a reasonably expected design solution consistent with established
and approved uses on adjacent properties and all applicable Design Guidelines of Beach by
Design. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section.
3. Signs: No sign of any kind is designed or located so that any portion of the sign is more than
six feet above the finished grade of the front lot line of the parcel proposed for development
unless such signage is a part of an approved comprehensive sign program.
A sign package has not been submitted yet although the applicant has committed to meeting
the requirements of the CDC with regard to signage.
4. Front setback.•
a. The reduced setback shall contribute to a more active and dynamic street life;
b. The reduced setback shall result in an improved site plan through the provision of a more
efficient off-street parking area, and/or improved building design and appearance; and
c. The reduced setback will not result in a loss of landscaped area, as those areas being
diminished by the setback reduction will be compensated for in othe� areas through a
Comprehensive Landscape Plan.
The proposed front setbacks of between 10 and 15 feet to building are consistent with
those as otherwise required as part of a Level I Flexible Standard Development review.
The front setback reductions to less than 10 feet are limited only to pavement including a
drop-off driveway along Fifth Street and a patio/plaza at the northwest corner of the site
along Coronado Drive and Fifth Street. While perimeter landscaping is not required
landscape buffers are provided along all property lines except along Fifth Street.
Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section.
Community Development Board — July 21, 2015
FLD2015-05016 — Page 16
° Clearwater Level II Flexible Develo ment A lication Review PLANNING& DEVELOPMENT
p pp DEVELOPMENTREVIEWDIVISION
� ;�c��� � ���..r.�..
S. Side and rear setbacks:
a. The reduced setback does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emergency
vehicles and/or personnel;
b. The reduced setback results in an improved site plan through the provision of a more
efficient off-street parking area, andlor improved building design and appearance; and
c. The reduced setback will not result in a loss of landscaped area, as those areas being
diminished by the setback reduction will be compensated for in other areas through a
Comprehensive Landscape Plan.
The provided side setbacks to building of 10 feet are consistent with that as otherwise
required as part of a Level I Flexible Standard Development review. The only requested
reduction in side setback is for six surface parking spaces along the south side of the site.
This reduction will not hamper emergency vehicles or personnel, helps provide the CDC-
required number of parking spaces without enlarging the parking garage and does not
reduce any otherwise required landscape areas. Therefore, this criterion is not strictly
applicable to the application.
6. Off-street parking:
a. The proposed development contains no more than 130 rooms; and
b. The proposed development is within 1, 000 feet of an existing public parking garage with
documented available capaciry.
The proposed 166-room hotel requires 199 parking spaces at 1.2 spaces per room where a
minimum of 199 spaces are proposed. As such no request for a reduction in parking is
included with the proposal. Therefore, this criterion is not strictly applicable to the
application.
7. The design of all buildings shall comply with the Tourist District site and architectural
design guidelines in Section 3-501, as applicable.
As discussed in detail in this document, the proposal is fully compliant with all applicable
portions of the Design Guidelines of Beach by Design. Therefore, the proposal is consistent
with this CDC Section.
8. Lot area andlor width: The reduction shall not result in a building which is out of scale with
existing buildings in the immediate vicinity.
The subject property is 57,964 square feet in area and approximately 400 feet wide which
exceeds the otherwise required lot area and width parameters. The proposal is consistent
with these Code provisions. Therefore, this criterion is not strictly applicable to the
application.
9. The parcel proposed for development shall, if located within the Coastal Storm Area, have a
hurricane evacuation plan requiring the use close when a hurricane watch is posted,- and
The provision of a hurricane evacuation plan has been made a condition of approval of this
application. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section.
Community Development Board — July 2l, 2015
FLD2015-OSOl6 — Page 17
° Clearwater Level II Fiexible Development Application Review PLANNING& DEVELOPMENT
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION
1 D. A development agreement must be approved by the city council pursuant to F.S. ��
163.3221-163.3243 and Community Development Code Section 4-606 if the development
proposal exceeds the base density andlor base F.A.R. established for the underlying Future
Land Use designation. The development agreement shall:
a. Comply with all applicable requirements of the "Rules Concerning the Administration of
the Countywide Future Land Use Plan" as they pertain to alternative density/intensity,
and as amended from time to time;
b. Be recorded with the clerk of the circuit court pursuant to F.S. � 163.3239, with a copy
filed with the property appraiser's office, and a copy submitted to the PPC and CPA for
receipt and filing within 14 days after recording; and
c. Have its development limitations memorialized in a deed restriction, which shall be
recorded in the Official Records of Pinellas Counry prior to the issuance of any building
permit for the overnight accommodations use.
On September 18, 2014, the City Council approved the allocation of up to 100 units from
the Hotel Density Reserve under Beach by Design (Case No. HDA2013-08006) and
adopted a resolution to the same effect (Res. No. 14-25) which included the approval of a
development agreement. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section.
11. Accessory Uses:
a. Accessory uses must be incidental, subordinate, and customarily accessory to overnight
accommodations.
Proposed accessory uses are limited to retail and restaurant space, an exercise room and a
pool and outdoor patio and are considered as subordinate and customarily accessory
overnight accommodations. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section.
b. The following shall apply to required parking for accessory uses:
i. Accessory uses located within the building interior may occupy between I S
percent and 20 percent of the gross floor area of the development, but only
when additional parking is provided for that portion of the accessory uses
which exceeds 1 S percent. The required amount of parking shall be calculated
by using the minimum off-street parking development standard for the most
intensive accessory use(s). Where there is a range of parking standards, the
lowest number of spaces allowed shall be used to calculate the additional
amount of off-street parking required for the project. In projects where the
interior accessory uses exceed 20 percent of the building gross floor area, all
interior accessory uses shall be considered additional primary uses for
purposes of calculating development potential and parking requirements.
The proposed amount of interior accessory use area constitutes approximately
four percent of the gross floor area of the hotel. Therefore, this criterion is not
strictly applicable to the application.
ii. Regardless of the gross floor area percentage, overnight accommodations with
fewer than 50 rooms that have a full service restaurant shall comply with the
parking standards for the restaurant use as contained in Table 2-803. The
lowest number of spaces allowed shall be used to calculate the additional
amount of off-street parking required for the restaurant.
Community Development Board — July 21, 2015
FLD2015-05016 — Page l 8
' Ll�N�i �[iLL� Level II Flexibie Development Application Review FLANNING & DEVELOP[viENT
' .:'��a.,� :� .: �. ..
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION
The proposal includes a hotel with more than 50 rooms. Therefore, this
criterion is not strictly applicable to the application.
c. In addition to the requirements above, for those projects that request additional rooms
from the Hotel Density Reserve established in Beach by Design and whose interior
accessory uses are between ten percent and 1 S percent of the gross floor area of the
proposed building, density shall be calculated as follows:
i. Calculate the maximum number of units allowed by the base density;
ii. Calculate the maximum number of units that may be allocated fi•om the Hotel
Density Reserve established in Beach by Design;
iii. Add the figures determined in i. and ii. to determine the total number of units
allowed for the site;
iv. Divide the total number of units allowed, as calculated in iii., by the total land
area to determine the resulting units per acre for the project site;
v. Determine the total floor area of all interior accessory uses exceeding ten
percent of the gross floor area of the proposed building;
vi. Subtract the figure determined in v, from the total land area, and divide this
difference by 43,560 to determine the net acreage;
vii. Multiply the net acreage derived in vi. by the applicable resulting units per
acre figure determined in iv. The resulting product is the mcrximum number of
rooms allowable for the project.
viii. The final allocation of rooms from the Hotel Densiry Reserve shall be
determined by multiplying the net acreage determined in vi. by the base density
and subtracting this product from the maximum number of rooms allowable for
the project as determined in vii.
The proposed amount of interior accessory use area constitutes approximately
four percent of the gross floor area of the hotel. Therefore, this criterion is not
strictly applicable to the application.
d. Signage for any accessory use shall be subordinate to and incorporated into the primary
freestanding signage for the overnight accommodation use. In no case shall more than 25
percent of the sign area be dedicated to the accessory uses.
A sign package has not been submitted yet although the applicant has committed to
meeting the requirements of the CDC with regard to signage.
e. Those developments that have obtained additional density from the Destination Resort
Density Pool established in Beach by Design are not subject to the requirements set forth
in Sections 2-803.I.11. a—d.
The proposal includes units obtained through the Reserve not the Pool. Therefore, this
criterion is not strictly applicable to the application.
Section 4-206.D.4: Burden of proof. The burden of proof is upon the applicant to show by
substantial competent evidence that he is entitled to the approval requested.
The applicant has adequately demonstrated through the submittal of substantial competent
evidence that the request is entitled to the approval requested as required by CDC Section 4-
206.D.4.
Community Development Board — July 21, 2015
FLD2015-05016 — Page 19
Y V�LLtil ►!'fit�l.� Level II Flexible Development Application Review
'J ... diiaek�. ......
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
DEVELOPMENT REV�W DMSION
Compliance with Standards and Criteria:
The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the standards as
per CDC Tables 2-801.1 and 2-803:
Standard Proposed Consistent' Inconsistent
Density 50 overnight 166 ovemight accommodation X
accommodation units per units
acre (66 units) plus 100
units from the Reserve
(166 units total)
Impervious Surface Ratio 0.95 0.80 X
Minimum Lot Area 10,000 to 20,000 sf 57,964 sf X
Minimum Lot Width 100 - 150 feet 400 feet X
Minimum Setbacks Front: 0- 15 feet North: 15 feet (to building) X
Zero feet (to paving)
East: 15 feet (to building) X
West: 10 feet (to building)
Zero feet (to paving) X
Side: 0-10 feet North: 10 feet (to building) X
South: 10 feet (to building)
6 feet (to paving)
East: 10 feet (to building)
Maximum Height 35 - 100 feet 100 feet X
Minimum I- 1.2 spaces per unit 199 spaces X
Off-Street Parkin 166 - 199 s aces 1.2 s aces er unit
1 See analysis in Staff Report
Compliance with General Applicability Standards:
The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General
Standards for Level One and Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3-914.A:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in hannony with the scale, bulk,
coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of
adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons
residing or working in the neighborhood.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate
vicinity.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual,
acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties.
� See analysis in staff report.
Community Development Board — July 21, 2015
FLD2015-05016 — Page 20
Consistent� Inconsistent
X
X
X
X
X
X
� C��t1�1 11r�1��1 Level II Flexible DevelopmentApplication Review PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT
;����. . ... . .
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION
Compliance with Flexibility Criteria:
The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility
criteria as per CDC Section 2-803.K (Overnight Accommodations):
Consistent' � Inconsistent
1. With the exception of those properties located on Clearwater Beach, the parcel X
proposed for development shall front on but shall not involve direct access to a major
arterial street unless no other means of access would be possible.
2. Height: The increased height results in an improved site plan and/or improved design X
and appearance.
3. Signs: No sign of any kind is designed or located so that any portion of the sign is more X
than six feet above the finished grade of the front lot line of the parcel proposed for
development unless such signage is a part of an approved comprehensive sign program.
4. Front setback: X
a. The reduced setback shall contribute to a more active and dynamic street life;
b. The reduced setback shall result in an improved site plan through the provision
of a more efficient off=street parking area, and/or improved building design and
appearance;and
c. The reduced setback will not result in a loss of landscaped area, as those areas
being diminished by the setback reduction will be compensated for in other
areas through a Comprehensive Landscape Plan.
5. Side and rear setbacks: N/A
a. The reduced setback does not prevent access to the rear of any building by
emergency vehicles and/or personnei;
b. The reduced setback results in an improved site plan through the provision of
a more efficient off-street parking area, and/or improved building design and
appearance; and
c. The reduced setback will not result in a loss of landscaped area, as those areas
being diminished by the setback reduction will be compensated for in other
areas through a Comprehensive Landscape Plan.
6. Off-street pazking: N/A
a. The proposed development contains no more than 130 rooms;
b. The proposed development is within 1,000 feet of an existing public parking
garage with documented available capacity.
7. The design of all buildings shall comply with the Tourist District site and architectural X
design guidelines in Section 3-501, as applicable.
8. Lot area and/or width: The reduction shall not result in a building which is out of scale N/A
with existing buildings in the immediate vicinity.
9. The parcel proposed for development shall, if located within the Coastal Storm Area, X
have a hurricane evacuation plan requiring the use close when a hurricane watch is
posted.
10. A development agreement must be approved by the city council pursuant to F.S. §§ X
163.3221-163.3243 and Community Development Code Section 4-606 if the
development proposal exceeds the base density and/or base F.A.R. established for the
underlying Future Land Use designation. The development agreement shall:
a. Comply with all applicable requirements of the "Rules Concerning the
Administration of the Countywide Future Land Use Plan" as they pertain to
alternative density/intensity, and as amended from time to time;
b. Be recorded with the clerk of the circuit court pursuant to F.S. § 1633239,
with a copy filed with the property appraiser's office, and a copy submitted to
the PPC and CPA for receipt and filing within 14 days after recording; and
c. Have its development limitations memorialized in a deed restriction, which
shall be recorded in the Official Records of Pinellas County prior to the
issuance of any building permit for the overnight accommodations use.
11. Accessory Uses:
Community Development Board – July 21, 2015
FLD2015-05016 – Page 21
� lilLAl f'1�[LL�1 Level II Flexible Development Application Review
u .. �,s.... _&",.... .���8's" .. ..:: . .
a. Accessory uses must be incidental, subordinate, and customarily accessory to
overnight accommodations;
b. The following shall apply to required parking for accessory uses:
❑ Accessory uses located within the building interior may occupy between IS
percent and 20 percent of the gross floor area of the development, but only
when additional parking is provided for that portion of the accessory uses
which exceeds 15 percent. The required amount of parking shall be
calculated by using the minimum off-street pazking development standard
for the most intensive accessory use(s). Where there is a range of parking
standards, the lowest number of spaces allowed shall be used to calculate
the additional amount of off-street pazking required for the project. In
projects where the interior accessory uses exceed 20 percent of the building
gross floor area, all interior accessory uses shall be considered additional
primary uses for purposes of calculating development potential and parking
requirements.
❑ Regardless of the gross floor area percentage, overnight accommodations
with fewer than 50 rooms that have a full service restaurant shall comply
with the parking standards for the restaurant use as contained in Table 2-
803. The lowest number of spaces allowed shall be used to calculate the
additional amount of off-street parking required for the restaurant.
c. In addition to the requirements above, for those projects that request additional
rooms from the Hotel Density Reserve established in Beach by Design and
whose interior accessory uses are between ten percent and 15 percent of the
gross floor area of the proposed building, density shall be calculated as
follows:
❑ Calculate the ma}cimum number of units allowed by the base density;
❑ Calculate the maximum number of units that may be allocated from the
Hotel Density Reserve established in Beach by Design;
❑ Add the figures determined in i. and ii. to determine the total number of
units allowed for the site;
❑ Divide the total number of units allowed, as calculated in iii., by the total
land area to determine the resulting units per acre for the project site;
❑ Determine the total floor area of all interior accessory uses exceeding ten
percent of the gross floor area of the proposed building
❑ Subtract the figure determined in v. from the total land area, and divide this
difference by 43,560 to determine the net acreage;
❑ Multiply the net acreage derived in vi. by the applicable resulting units per
acre figure determined in iv. The resulting product is the ma}cimum number
of rooms allowable for the project; and
❑ The final allocation of rooms from the Hotel Density Reserve shall be
determined by muitiplying the net acreage determined in vi. by the base
density and subtracting this product from the maximum number of rooms
allowable for the project as determined in vii.
d. Signage for any accessory use shall be subordinate to and incorporated into the
primary freestanding signage for the overnight accommodation use. In no case
shall more than 25 percent of the sign area be dedicated to the accessory uses.
e. Those developments that have obtained additional density from the Destination
Resort Density Pool established in Beach by Design are not subject to the
reauirements set forth in Sections 2-803.I.1 l.a—d:
� See analysis in Staff Report.
Community Development Board — July 21, 2015
FLD2015-05016 — Page 22
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION
Consistent' Inconsistent
X
X
N/A
N/A
X
N/A
a lilearwater Level II Flexible Development Application Review
� ,.
Compliance with Beach by Design Design Guidelines:
1. Section A: Density.
2. Section B: Height.
3. Section C: Design, Scale and Mass of Buildings.
4. Section D: Setbacks.
5. Section: Street-Level Fa�ades.
6. Section F: Parking Areas.
7
8.
Section G: Signage.
Section H: Sidewalks.
9. Section I: Street Furniture and Bicycle Racks.
10. Section J: Street Lighting.
1 l. Section K: Fountains.
12. Section L: Materials and Colors.
� See analysis in Sta.,f'fReport.
PLAi�'NING & DEVELOPMENT
DEVELOPMENT REVI&W DIVISION
Consistent� � Inconsistent
X
X
X
X
X
X
N/A
X
X
N/A
N/A
X
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials
at its meeting of June 4, 2015, and deemed the development proposal to be legally sufficient to
move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following iindings
of fact and conclusions of law:
Findings of Fact:
The Planning and Development Department, having reviewed all evidence submitted by the
applicant and requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that there is substantial
competent evidence to support the following findings of fact:
1. The 132-acre site is bound by Coronado Drive (west), Hamden Drive (east) Fifth Street
(north) at the intersection Hamden Drive and Bayside Drive;
2. On July 19, 2005, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved Case Nos.
FLD2005-02021 /TDR2005-03020;
3. On April 19, 2011, the CDB approved Case No. FLD2011-02005;
4. On September 18, 2014, the City Council approved the allocation of up to 100 units from the
Hotel Density Reserve under Beach by Design (Case No. HDA2013-08006) and adopted a
resolution to the same effect (Res. No. 14-25);
5. The property is currently occupied by a parking lot in accordance with Case FLD2011-02005
and overnight accommodations;
6. The site plan associated with Case No. FLD2005-02021 has expired;
7. That the subject property is located within the Tourist (T) District and the Resort Facilities
High (RFH) Future Land Use Plan category;
8. The subject property is located in the Small Motel District of Beach by Design;
9. The subject property is comprised of five parcels with frontage of approximately 400 feet
along Coronado Drive, 200 feet along Fifth Street and 175 feet of frontage along Hamden
Drive;
10. The proposal is to construct a new hotel building on the property consisting of 166 overnight
accommodation units;
Community Development Board — July 21, 2015
FLD2015-OSOl6 — Page 23
r Cl�(41 1`►�`�1 Level II Flexible DevelopmentApplication Review PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT
� DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DMS[ON
. ... �.�.N . . ..
11. The proposal includes a minimum of 199 parking spaces where 199 spaces are required;
12. The proposed hotel height is 100 feet;
13. The proposal includes a front (north) setback of 15 feet (to building) and zero feet (to
pavement), a side (north) setback of 10 feet (to building), a side (south) setback of 10 feet (to
building) and six feet (to pavement), a front (east) setback of 15 feet (to building and
pavement), a side (east) setback of 10 feet (to building, a front (west) setback of 10 feet (to
building) and zero feet (to pavement;
14. That the proposal is fully in compliance with all applicable portions of the Beach by Design
guidelines with the exception of Section D.3 and that Staff believes that this one exception is
consistent with the intent of the Design Guidelines; and,
15. There are no active Code Compliance cases for the subject property.
Conclusions of Law:
The Planning and Development Department, having made the above findings of fact, reaches the
following conclusions of law:
1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards pursuant to CDC Tables 2-
801.1 and 2-803;
2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria pursuant to CDC
Section 2-803.K;
3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level One and
Two Approvals pursuant to CDC Section 3-914.A;
4. That the development is consistent with the General Purposes of the CDC pursuant to CDC
Section 1-103;
5. That the development is consistent with applicable components of the City's Comprehensive
Plan;
6. That the application is consistent with the requirement for the submittal of substantial
competent evidence pursuant to CDC Section 4-206.D.4;
7. That the development is consistent with the Small Motel District of Beach by Design; and,
8. That the development proposal is consistent with the Design Guidelines of Beach by Design.
Based upon the above, the Planning and Development Department recommends APPROVAL of
the Flexible Development application to permit a 166-room overnight accommodation use in the
Tourist (T) District with a lot area of 1.32 acres; a lot width of 400 feet; a front (north) setback of
15 feet (to building) and zero feet (to pavement), a side (north) setback of 10 feet (to building), a
side (south) setback of 10 feet (to building) and six feet (to pavement), a front (east) setback of
15 feet (to building and pavement), a side (east) setback of 10 feet (to building, a front (west)
setback of 10 feet (to building) and zero feet (to pavement); a building height of 100 feet; and a
minimum of 199 parking spaces at 1.2 parking spaces per hotel room, under the provisions of
CDC Section 2-803.K; and a two-year Development Order under the provisions of CDC Section
4-407 subject to the following conditions:
Conditions of Approval:
General/Miscellaneous Conditions
1. That any future freestanding sign(s) be a monument-style sign and that all signs be designed
to match the exterior materials and color of the building;
Community Development Board — July 21, 2015
FLD2015-05016 — Page 24
t Cibfil ��ll.l Level II Flexible Development Application Review PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
° . . . ,+�4'itRr"�?��^Yu . : � . .
DEVELOPMENT REV�W DIVISION
2. That all irrigation systems be connected to the City reclaimed water system where available
per Clearwater Code of Ordinances, Article IX., Reclaimed Water System, Section 32.376.
Reclaimed water lines are available in the Coronado Drive right-of-way;
3. That application for a building permit be submitted no later than July 21, 2017, unless time
extensions are granted pursuant to CDC Section 4-407;
Timin� Conditions - Prior to Issuance of Permit
4. That, prior to the issuance of any buildings except for clearing and grubbing, demolition or
the provision of fill, a site plan which indicates that where sidewalks cross driveways
treatments such as pavers or textured paving are used and that the details of that treatment
including but not limited to pattern, type and installation methodology be approved by Staff;
5. That, prior to the issuance of any permits for construction, except for clearing and grubbing,
demolition or the provision of fill, the fit, finish, materials, the installation methodology of
the sidewalks and any associated sidewalk amenities (such as benches, trash receptacles,
trees, lighting), as the case may be, be coordinated with and approved by City Staff;
6. That, prior to the issuance of any permits for construction, except for clearing and grubbing,
demolition or the provision of fill, all sub-standard sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to
or a part of the project shall be shown on plans to be improved to meet the requirement of
Local, State and/or Federal standards including A.D.A. requirements (truncated domes per
FDOT Index #304);
7. That, prior to the issuance of any building permits, except for clearing and grubbing,
demolition or the provision of fill, sea-turtle friendly light fixtures be employed with the site
design, with compliance demonstrated on plans acceptable to the Environmental Engineering
Division;
8. That, prior to the issuance of any building permits, except for clearing and grubbing,
demolition or the provision of fill, a final landscape plan which eliminates the use of sod
except in areas related to stormwater is submitted to and approved by Staff;
9. That, prior to the issuance of any permits for vertical construction, the location and visibility
of electric equipment (electric panels, boxes and meters) be reviewed and, if located exterior
to the building where visible from any street frontage, be shown to be painted the same color
as the portion of the building to which such features are attached;
10. That, prior to the issuance of any permits for construction, except for clearing and grubbing,
demolition or the provision of fill, the Fire Department may require the provision of a Water
Study performed by a Fire Protection Engineer in order to ensure that an adequate water
supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the
impact of the project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required
fire sprinkler, standpipe andlor fire pump. If a fire pump is required, then the water supply
must be able to supply 150 percent of its rated capacity;
11. That prior to the issuance of any permits for construction a Hurricane Evacuation Plan be
submitted to and approved by the City;
Timin� Conditions - Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy
12. That, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the sidewalks and any associated
sidewalk amenities be installed to the satisfaction of City Staff along any street frontages;
and
Community Development Board — July 21, 2015
FLD2015-05016 — Page 25
� Cl��l ��L�.t Level II Flexible Develo ment A lication Review PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
p Pp DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION
� . a� � �o��,
13. That, prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, all service lines onto the property
shall be installed underground unless found to be impractical purs� to CDC Section 3-912.
rf ,_,.°-----�
Prepared by Planning and Development Department Staff: �'`�''"���
ark T. Parry, AIC�"; Planner III
ATTACHMENTS: Photographs
Community Development Board — July 21, 2015
FLD20l 5-05016 — Page 26
r,i� ` 2_
;%r
,,; `
..�
LANDSCAPE
E EN SCREE N �
�EL 3 GAR/�„E
10'ADEWALR
W ��'�� ���
atFF N SCREE N �
LEV EL 3 GARAg
:.-j-" - - _ - ' �: :,, °�,.� �-
; . --
. . L, . .. . .../I
�':�� i : �
. . -
_ �
,,` �
��.` �
�._ �
;.., !- ____
i ; _ ..___._'
,,r. r� �
// .� IXiSTINGTIA�OSIQ0.Y
� HOTEL �
( GRADE
� PARkiNG
(
��: ___
� P/L '
PAVER P LAIA
�. __
�
!
�
ivn
�
'
� EX671NG ONE Sf ORV
HOTFL �
�.-------'- -. Y � _ � �...-- -
. �
, � HAMDEN DRNF
r� SITEPLflM1(
�,,.� _�,�
_ti .
����
�
"" —LANDSCAPEARFA
� ��"'. r _
1� �.
��
/
�
I'
,I �
�
I __.
1
i
P/LI
,
1
I�.
1 �-�_ � .
�---------
P%L ��_
PAYERPLAI
f �vn
, ,- .
� t�
'i' .
`� � �
_ Ii � -�
1
� �.. j� ��
� � �
I � _ � �
_ ;; _� � � �
. ��.�.�. ' :.; ��
. `
evuv
ENTRAN EXR
1
� f� , �,._._.-
--� ' � �f
C �� ,
�, r� '
!,�w....:. ::,:._.: -._ .�
^��: <._, `�-10'S�DEWALH QlEENSCREEN��-LANDSCAPEAREA
, ���.� �LEVEL3 GARACZ
n�
1 �,�
��
445 CORONADO DRIVE
PH4T0 KEY FLD2015-05016
� . - �
.� � �..t� .�' ,>
-',, f .• �J � . .. �. � .,� ✓ ' �� ' "�tiJc�flT.:{�'�� �, �,
��• �i( .z i>.��Rrr r���� � �' �� y� '7� �+°
-' wr,�' 1 � / t ' 'PiP ��'�.�".iYl> 4
• r �
..� � f:t ��iL �'�ytra s, , 5 ir� ��� p? �"k,�',�,;%,�j�
`,�t . ! i£"�
•^ir k+" �t..�, ai}� 7�.7 i i� : : �Vr .:l,JyR! y �'�e .
. .. T.. .. ..� .. ,. , _, �Yi•4,. 4X"...,.,.:� . . ... . . ,ipw. .�.. '�'. �rrt: �. ..:� >,'�
Looking northeast at waterfront portion of site on east side of
Hamden.
: ��
�' ���
,�((�`�� ..—_- ._ -�•
•... �� T
I' � •
• 4� ' � ��,`���
Looking southwest from northeast corner of site at 5'h and Looking east from northwest corner of site from 5�h and
Hamden. Coronado.
,; ,
.. . �
. �
.„;� , ,
...w � �„
. .
r. �. , . �
s.. . .:: ... -�
,_. � .�
�-�_
�a�.a�nzc.nrn<:. .. ._:�a .a� . . .z:. �c-.r::.;:.
... y. .. . . .
�"73�'3����L::
.. �_. _�...__.
4 ♦i� � ,,:�� N � �
Looking northeast from southwest corner of site along
Coronado.
<_ ;��:`—
'�
Looking west at southeast corner of the site along Hamden. Looking southeast at north side of site along Sth.
405 CORONADO DRIVE
FLD2015-05016
MARK T. PARRY
100 S. Myrtle Avenue Tel: (727) 562.4741
Clearwater, FL 33756 E-mail: mark parry myclearwater com
SUMMARY OF QUALIFICATIONS
A dedicated, AICP certified professional Planner focused on contributing to the field of Urban Planning
experienced in public and private sector planning. An excellent communicator, able to effectively interact
with clients, local government officials and business professionals at all levels. Experienced in various
aspects of urban design and planning, zoning regulations and permitting.
OBJECTIVE
To secure a Planning position which will allow me to continue improving the built environment and my
community through sound and innovative planning and design principals.
EDUCATION
COOK COLLEGE, RUTGERS UNIVERSITY, New Brunswick, NJ
B.S. Landscape Architecture Major, Urban Planning Certification
B.S. Environmental Planning and Design
Certificate Urban Planning
Golden Key National Honor Society; Sigma Lambda A/pha
American Planning Association (Florida Chapter); member
AICP #020597
40-hour OSHA (Hazwoper) Training
PLANNER III PLANNING DEPARTMENT, CITY OF CLEARWATER 04/12 - Present
08/98 — 04/05
• Responsible for nonresidential and single/multi-family site plan review and permitting.
• Assist in the implementation and subsequent review of the Community Development Code.
• Responsible for assessing and writing Community Development Code amendments.
• Land Development Code development, interpretation and application.
• Provide, inspect and direct landscape review/design.
• Acting Development Review Manager 9/99 —11/99 and 01/05 — 03/05.
• Manage and direct Associate Planners.
• Review, process and present variance/conditional use, land use/zoning atlas amendment and annexation
applications at in-house and public review meetings.
• Principal Planner in creating and implementing Clearwater's Downtown Design Guidelines.
Assisted in the implementation and application of the Clearwater powntown Redevelopment Plan.
SENIOR PLANNER DEVELOPMENT � ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, CARDNO TBE 04/05 — 04/12
• Planner of record for Cities of Indian Rocks Beach, Seminole and Clearwater and Town of Belleair.
• Responsible for nonresidential and single/multi-family site plan review and permitting.
• Perform site design and inspections.
• Provide technical planning support for engineering department.
• Provide support for Zoning Code, Comprehensive Plan, Zoning and Land Use Plan amendments.
• Research and write Evaluation and Appraisal Reports.
• Create and update Special Area Plans/Form-based Codes.
• Provide CADD support.
• Assist with creating redevelopment marketing material.
• Perform technical environmental services including soil and groundwater sampling.
Designer/Owner GREENSCAPES-GLD, MARLBORO, NJ g/92 _ g�gg
• Founded and established a local garden and landscape business.
• Plan and oversee installation of commercial and residential landscaping projects utilizing a variety of CADD
and photo-manipulation programs.
• Develop and implement advertising programs, brochures and graphics.
• Estimate, bid and negotiate jobs.
• Source and negotiate purchase of materials and equipment.
• Manage, train and schedule installation crews.
Program Supervisor LONGSTREET FARM, MONMOUTH COUNTY PARK SYSTEM,
HOLMDEL, NJ 6/87 - 8/93
• Assisted in formulating and running children's summer program ("Hayseed").
• Created and coordinated daily programs and schedules for 6-9 year old groups.
• Supervised several other programs throughout the year.
• Created a demand which was twice the program's capacity after the first year.
COMPUTER SKILLS
Access, Microsoft Office, Microsoft Works, ClarisWorks, MS Word, Land Designer Pro, Permit Plan,
Excel, Cornerstone, AutoCADD, PowerPoint, Publisher
LL
° � earwater
�,
Planning & Development Department
Flexible Development Application
Attached Dwellings, Mixed-Uses or Non-Residential Uses
IT IS INCUMBENT UPON THE APPLICANT TO SUBMIT COMPLETE AND CORRECT INFORMATION. ANY MISLEADING, DECEPTIVE,
INCOMPLETE OR INCORRECT INFORMATION MAY INVALIDATE YOUR APPLICATION.
ALL APPLICATIONS ARE TO BE FILLED OUT COMPLETELY AND CORRECTLY, AND SUBMITTED IN PERSON (NO FAX OR DELIVERIES)
TO THE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY NOON ON THE SCHEDULED DEADLINE DATE.
A TOTAL OF 11 COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS AND APPLICATION MATERIALS (1 ORIGINAL AND 10 COPIES) AS REQUIRED WITHIN
ARE TO BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW BY THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE. SUBSEQUENT SUBMITTAL FOR THE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD WILL REQUIRE 15 COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS AND APPLICATION MATERIALS (1 ORIGINAL
AND 14 COPIES). PLANS AND APPLICATIONS ARE REQUIRED TO BE COLLATED, STAPLED AND FOLDED INTO SETS.
THE APPLICANT, BY FILING THIS APPLICATION, AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF THE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE.
FIRE DEPT PRELIMARY SITE PLAN REVIEW FEE: $200
APPLICATION FEE: $1,205
PROPERTY OWNER (PER DEED): Mainstream Partners VIII, LTD iP�CEL "C")
MAILING ADDRESS: 2552 22ndAve. N, St. Petersburg, FL 33713
PHONE NUMBER: 727-224-6650
EMAIL: Antonio Fernandez / mamerica@tampabay.rr.com
Synergy Civil Engineering, Inc. (Michael J. Palmer, P.E.), Behar
AGENT OR REPRESENTATIVE: �eteranecra Inc. (Istvan Peteranecr AIA, NCARB�, .loe Burdette
MAILING ADDRESS: 3000 Gulf to Bay Blvd. Suite 201
PHONE NUMBER: �27-796-1926
EMAIL: mpalmer@synergycivileng.com
405 & 415 Coronado Dr. Clearwater, FL. 33767
ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: 08-29-15-17622-000-0010, 08-29-15-17622-000-0020
PARCEL NUMBER(5): 08-29-15-17622-000-0030, 08-29-15-17622-000-0050,
08-29-15-17622-000-0110, Lot 1A, Marina Parcel "C"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See attachment "A"
PROPOSED USE(S): l66 room Hotel with associated parking and amenities
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST:
Specifically identify the request SEE ATTACHMENT "B"
(include all requested code flexibility;
e.g., reduction in required number of
parking spaces, height setbacks, lot
size, lot width, specific use, etc.):
Planning 8 Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865
Page 1 of 8 Revised 01H2
LL
° C earwater
U
Planning & Development Department
Flexible Development Application
Data Sheet
PLEASE ENSURE THAT THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS FILLED OUT, IN ITS ENTIRETY. FAILURE TO COMPLETE THIS FORM
WILL RESULT IN YOUR APPLICATION BEING FOUND INCOMPLETE AND POSSIBLY DEFERRED UNTIL THE FOLLOWING
APPLICATION CYCLE.
ZONING DISTRICT:
FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATION:
EXISTING USE (currently existing on site):
Tourist District "T"
Resort Faciliries High "RFH"
(Current use parking lot, Motel / Multi Family buildings)
PROPOSED USE (new use, if any; plus existing, if to remain);Hotel
SITE AREA: 57,564
sq. ft. 1.32
acres
GROSS FLOOR AREA (total square footage of all buildings):
Existing: 12�420 sq. ft.
Proposed: 118,455 Sq ft 118,455 BLG. + 93,000 PARKING GARAGE
=211,455 SF.
Maximum Allowable: N�A sq. ft.
GROSS FLOOR AREA (total square footage devoted to each use, if there will be multiple uses):
First use: 113,995 sq. ft.Hotel
Second use: 4,460 (3.77%) Sq, ft. Accessory
Third use: N/A sq. ft.
FLOOR AREA RATIO (total square footage of all buildings divided by the total square footage of entire site):
Existing: �
Proposed: N/A ( l0% accessory use < 10%) Allowable)
Maximum Allowable: N/A
BUILDING COVERAGE/FOOTPRINT (1S` floor square footage of all buildings):
Existing: 6,927 sq. ft. ( 12.03 % of site)
Proposed: 36,700 Sq, ft. ( 61.43 % of site)
Maximum Permitted: 54,686 sq. ft. ( 95 % of site)
GREEN SPACE WITHIN VEHICULAR USE AREA (green space within the parking lot and interior of site; not perimeter buffer):
Existing: I�112 sq. ft. ( 2•6 % of site)
Proposed: 265 min. sq. ft. ( 0.5 % of site)
VEHICULAR USE AREA (parking spaces, drive aisles, loading area):
Existing: 26,957 Sq, ft, � 46.5
Proposed: 2,652 sq. ft. ( 4.6
% of site)
% of site)
Planning 8 Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865
Page 2 of 8 Revised 01/12
IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RATIO (total square footage of impervious areas divided by the totai square footage of entire site�:
Existing: O.S9
Pro�osed: �1 �0
Maximum Permitted: Q9S-( 5�,686 sf.j
DENSITY (units, rooms or beds p�r acrej: BUILDING HEIGHT:
Existing: 2� �ri'� Existing: 3S�
Praposed: Sll/uc. 'f'Ii%%I HUIt"I RFSt'�p=IG6 Proposed: I00'-(1"a8uve BFB=12.0
Maximum Permitted: JSD IJiU/QC Maximum Permitted: f�` �+��� �FE=12.R
OFF-STREET PARKING:
Existirtg:
Proposed:
Minimum Requi�ed:
41
199 MIN.
1.2X166=199
WHAT IS THE ESTIMATER TOTAL VAWE OF THE PROJECT UPON COMPLETION� $ 10,D(tU,UUl1.00
ZONING DISTRICTS FOR ALL ADIACENT PROPERTY:
North: Tnurisl
South: Tourisi
East: TQUri.st
West: Tourisl
STATE O� FLORlDA, GCIUNTY OF PiNEIIAS
I, the undersigned, acicnowledge that all Sworr� to and sub�cribed before me this �� day of
representations made in this application are true and `�,�
accurate to the best of my knowfedge and authorize �"�'g` -���� . to me and/o� by
City representati+res to visit and photograph the ��c�'l!O �-G�'!?.�tl2�� who 1 ersonally know has
,prqnerry cfesc�ribed � th;s appl aiion. �����
_ � : f, •
,, �4
�
�, Si�nature af'prqper ownex o�representative Notary p tic,
►�` `
�
My cornmission expires: /�
� N�rY Rubuc StaO� of i�pr�
_._ __ _� r_____ ,___._. _.� ___.__ _. �_ . __. _ .. __ ..... .• __•_� �t�rym,F'.1llftyp��,�_._�.w_._ . ._�_�..
� a� L"�oWin�s t� E� t55te5
Planning 8 Development Oepartmerrt, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue� Clearwater, FL 33T66, Tei: 727-682-4667; Fax: 727-663J866
Page 3 af 8 RevFred 01/12
LL
° � earwater Planning & Development Department
Flexible Development Application
" Site Plan Submittal Package Check list
IN ADDITION TO THE COMPLETED FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT (FLD) APPLICATION, ALL FLD APPLICATIONS SHALL INCLUDE A SITE
PLAN SUBMITTAL PACKAGE THAT INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION AND/OR PLANS:
❑ Responses to the flexibility criteria for the specific use(s) being requested as set forth in the Zoning District(s) in which the
subject property is located. The attached Flexible Development Application Flexibility Criteria sheet shall be used to provide
these responses.
❑ Responses to the General Applicability criteria set forth in Section 3-914.A. The attached Flexible Development Application
General Applicability Criteria sheet shall be used to p'rovide these responses.
❑ A signed and sealed survey of the property prepared by a registered land surveyor including the location of the property,
dimensions, acreage, location of all current structures/improvements, location of all public and private easements including
official records book and page numbers and street right(s)-of-way within and adjacent to the site.
❑ If the application would result in the removal or relocation of mobile home owners residing in a mobile home park as
provided in F.S. § 723.083, the application must provide that information required by Section 4-202.A.5.
❑ If this application is being submitted for the purpose of a boatlift, catwalk, davit, dock, marina, pier, seawall or other si milar
marine structure, then the application must provide detailed plans and specifications prepared by a Florida professional
engineer, bearing the seal and signature of the engineer, except signed and sealed plans shall not be required for the repair
or replacement of decking, stringers, railing, lower landings, tie piles, or the patching or reinforcing of existing piling on
private and commercial docks.
0 A site plan prepared by a professional architect, engineer or landscape architect drawn to a minimum scale of one inch equals
50 feet on a sheet size not to exceed 24 inches by 36 inches that includes the following information:
❑ Index sheet of the same size shall be included with individual sheet numbers referenced thereon.
❑ North arrow, scale, location map and date prepared.
❑ Identification of the boundaries of phases, if development is proposed to be constructed in phases.
❑ Location of the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL), whether the property is located within a Special Flood Hazard
Area, and the Base Flood Elevation (BFE) of the property, as applicable.
❑ Location, footprint and size of all existing and proposed buildings and structures on the site.
❑ Location and dimensions of vehicular and pedestrian circulation systems, both on-site and off-site, with proposed points
of access.
0 Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks, curbs, water lines, sanitary sewer lines, storm drains, fire hydrants and
seawalls and any proposed utility easements.
❑ Location of onsite and offsite stormwater management facilities as well as a narrative describing the proposed
stormwater control plan including calculations. Additional data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City of
Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual may be required at time of building construction permit.
❑ Location of solid waste collection facilities, required screening and provisions for accessibility for collection.
❑ Location of off-street loading area, if required by Section 3-1406.
❑ All adjacent right(s)-of-way, with indication of centerline and width, paved width, existing median cuts and intersections
and bus shelters.
❑ Dimensions of existing and proposed lot lines, streets, drives, building lines, setbacks, structural overhangs and building
separations.
❑ Building or structure elevation drawings that depict the proposed building height and building materials.
Planning 8 Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fau: 727-562-4865
Page 4 of 8 Revised 01H2
- __
❑ Typical floor plans, including floor plans for each floor of any parking garage.
❑ Demolition plan.
❑ Identification and description of watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, specimen trees, and other environmentally
sensitive areas.
❑ If a deviation from the parking standards is requested that is greater than 50% (excluding those standards where the
difference between the top and bottom of the range is one parking space), then a parking demand study will need to be
provided. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are
approved. Please see the adopted Parking Demand Study Guidelines for further information.
❑ A tree survey showing the location, DBH and species of all existing trees with a DBH of four inches or more, and identifying
those trees proposed to be removed, if any.
❑ A tree inventory, prepared by a certified arborist, of all trees four inches DBH or more that reflects the size, canopy, and
condition of such trees may be required if deemed applicable by staff. Check with staff.
❑ A Traffic Impact Study shall be required for all proposed developments if the total generated net new trips meet one or more
of the following conditions:
■ Proposal is expected to generate 100 or more new trips in any given hour (directional trips, inbound or outbound on the
abutting streets) and/or 1,000 or more new trips per day; or
• Anticipated new trip generation degrades the level of service as adopted in the City's Comprehensive Plan to
unacceptable levels; or
■ The study area contains a segment of roadway and/or intersection with five reportable accidents within a prior twelve
month period, or the segment and/or intersection exists on the City's annual list of most hazardous locations, provided
by the City of Clearwater Police Department; or
■ The Traffic Operations Manager or their designee deems it necessary to require such assessment in the plan review
process. Examples include developments that are expected to negatively impact a constrained roadway or developments
with unknown trip generation and/or other unknown factors.
❑ A landscape plan shall be provided for any project where there is a new use or a change of use; or an existing use is improved
or remodeled in a value of 25% or more of the valuation of the principal structure as reflected on the property appraiser's
current records, or if an amendment is required to an existing approved site plan; or a parking lot requires additional
landscaping pursuant to the provisions of Article 3, Division 14. The landscape plan shall include the following information, if
not otherwise required in conjunction with the application for development approval:
❑ Location, size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including
botanical and common names.
❑ Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and location, including drip line.
❑ Interior landscape areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressed both in square
feet, exclusive of perimeter landscaped strips, and as a percentage of the paved area coverage of the parking lot and
vehicular use areas.
0 Location of existing and proposed structures and improvements, including but not limited to sidewalks, walls, fences,
pools, patios, dumpster pads, pad mounted transformers, fire hydrants, overhead obstructions, curbs, water lines,
sanitary sewer lines, storm drains, seawalls, utility easements, treatment of all ground surfaces, and any other features
that may influence the proposed landscape.
❑ Location of parking areas and other vehicular use areas, including parking spaces, circulation aisles, interior landscape
islands and curbing.
❑ Drainage and retention areas, including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations.
❑ Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscaped buffers including sight triangles, if any.
Planning 8 Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865
Page 5 of 8 Revised 07/72
LL
o Planning & Development Department
� earwater Flexible Develo mentA lication
P pP
" General Applicability Criteria
PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO EACH OF THE SIX (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA EXPLAINING HOW, IN DETAII, THE
CRITERION IS BEING COMPLIED WITH PER THIS DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL.
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent
properties in which it is located.
SEE ATTACHMENT "C"
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings
or significantly impair the value thereof.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood
of the proposed use.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for
development.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of
operation impacts, on adjacent properties.
Planning 8� Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865
Page 6 of 8 Revised 01H2
LL
° C ear�ater
��
Planning & Development Department
Flexible Development Application
Flexibilitv Criteria
PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO THE APPLICABLE FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR THE SPECIFIC USE(S) BEING REQUESTED AS SET
FORTH IN THE 20NING DISTRICT(5� IN WHICH THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED. EXPLAIN HOW, IN DETAIL, EACH CRITERION
IS BEING COMPLIED WITH PER THIS DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL (USE SEPARATE SHEETS AS NECESSARY).
SEE ATTACHMENT "D"
1.
2.
4.
5.
6.
Planning 8 Development Departrnent, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865
Page 7 of 8 Revised 01/72
0
y � ear�ater
Planning & Development Department
Flexible Development Application
L Affidavit to Authorize Agent/Representative
1. Provfde names of all property owners on cleed — PRINT full names:
�fainslreum Por�irers Vlll, I_ 7'l�
,4nlnni� Fernande:, Pariner
2. That (I am/we arej the owner(s} and record title holder�s} of the following described property:
ON�ner
3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for {describe request):
('ansrrurlron a%a Horel, purkinx ,�ara�e, ussacialyd urilih� co�necliuns, slornr nwler mana�emenl s1�7enr
and landscupir��
4. That the unde�signed (has/havej appointed and (does/do) appoint:
Sy ner�y Civi! Engineering, I»c. (.�Llichue! J. Palmerj, Behar Pelrruner-,, lnc. (Ist►�an L. Peteraneczl, Joe Burdelte
as {his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other dacume�ts necessary to affect such petition;
5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Flor9da to consider and act on the above desc�ibed
property;
6. That site visits to the property are netessary by Clty representatives in order to process thfs applicatian and the owner
authorizes City represe�ntatives to vis3t and photograph the property descrfbed In this application;
� ` _ a - •''_' ,
7. That (I/ ej, the un� signed,.suthv�ity, h�qby certify that the foregoing is true and carrect.
•� �
�._ '��1� �
,
;- " Property Owner"� Property Owner
Property �wner Property Owner
STATB OF FLURtDA� COUNTY OF PlNELLAS
BEFORE Iu9E THE UNOERSIGNED, AN OFFICER DULY COMMISSIONED BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, ON
�/
THIS fl%�`� OAY OF �.Jll�I� ,� IJ� , PERSON/�t.LY APPEARED
H�i7 �� !"'��1?�.�GG`e`L�. WHO HAVING BEEN FIRST DULY SWORN
T HEtSHE FULLY UNDERSTANDS THE C�NTENTS dF THE AFFIDAVIT THAT HEJSHE SIGNED.
: Calhiyn A yyAepn- ••-.�
, My Comm+�e�on EE ts5sas
�okaa � uzsrlot s
Notary SeaUStamp
� Notary Public Slgnature
My Commission Expires: %.� ���P%/5
Plann{ny 8� Oevelopment Departrnent,100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: T27-562�456T; Fax: 727-562�885
Page 8 ot 8 Revised �i112
9; 00 AM
Case number:
Owner(s):
Response to Comments FLD2015-05016 � 2015
FLD2015-05016 -- 405 CORONADO DR
Mainstream Partners Viii Ltd 10165 N W 19th St Miami, FL 33172-2529
PHONE: 7272246650, Fax: No fax, Email: No email
Applicant: Mainstream Partners Viii
2552 22nd Avenue North
St. Petersburg, FL 33713
PHONE: 7277961926, Fax: No fax, Email: No email
Representative: Michael Palmer
3000 Gulf To Bay Blvd Suite 201
Clearwater, FL 33579
PHONE: 7277961926, Fax: No fax, Email: Mpalmer@synergycivileng.Com
Location:
Atlas Page:
Zoning District:
bound by Coronado Drive (west), Hamden Drive (east) 5th Street (north) at
the intersection Hamden Drive and Bayside Drive
276A
Tourist
Request: Flexible Development approval to permit a 166-room overnight
accommodation use in the Tourist (T) District with a lot area of 1.32 acres; a
lot width of 400 feet; a front (north) setback of 15 feet (to building) and zero
feet (to pavement), a side (north) setback of 10 feet (to building), a side
{south) setback of 10 feet (to building) and six feet (to pavement), a front
(east) setback of 15 feet (to building and pavement), a side (east) setback of
10 feet (to building, a front (west) setback of 10 feet (to building) and zero
feet (to pavement); a building height of 100 feet; and a minimum of 199
parking spaces at 1.2 parking spaces per hotel room, under the provisions of
CDC Section 2-803.K; and a two-year Development Order under the
provisions of CDC Section 4-407.
Proposed Use:
Neighborhood
Association(sj:
Presenter:
Overnight Accommodations
Clearwater Neighborhood Coalition
Mark Parry, Planner III
The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments:
1
Response to Comments FLD2015-05016 � 2015
Engineering Prior to Community Development Board:
Review Sheet A1-0 calls out 10 foot sidewalks along Hamden Drive and Coronado Drive. The
Civil Site Plans and narrative call for 6 foot sidewalks. Please correct this discrepancy.
"*SEE PAGE 39 ON DOCUMENT. Architectural site plan was revised to coordinate
with the 7' sidewalks shown on Civil drawings.
Engineering Prior to Community Development Board:
Review Sheet C-03 demonstrates 6 foot sidewalks along 5th Street and Hamden Drive. There
appears to be sufficient Right of Way for wider sidewalks in these areas. Please follow
Beach by Design standards for these sidewalks and include 7 foot wide sidewalks.
**SEE PAGE 55 ON DOCUMENT.RESPONSE: RESPONSE: Revised to 7 foot wide.
Engineering Prior to Community Development Board:
Review The Architectural Plan (Sheet A2-1) shows a landscape island in the Right of Way on
Fifth Street. The Civil Site Plan (sheet C-03) does not show the landscape island. How
will the sidewalk work with this landscape island? "*SEE PAGE 40 ON DOCUMENT.
RESPONSE: Revised to coordinate with Civil drawings.
Engineering Prior to Community Development Board:
Review The Architectural Plan (Sheet A2-1) shows a landscape island in the Right of Way on
Fifth Street. The Civil Site Plan (sheet C-03) does not show the landscape island. Please
correct this discrepancy. **SEE PAGE 40 ON DOCUMENT. RESPONSE: Revised to
coordinate with Civil drawings.
Engineering Prior to Community Development Board:
Review The Architectural Plan (Sheet A2-1) shows an angled Driveway for the Western
Driveway off of Fifth Street. The Civil Site Plan (sheet C-03) does not demonstrate the
same angled entry. Please correct this discrepancy. *''SEE PAGE 40 ON DOCUMENT.
RESPONSE: Revised to coordinate with Civil drawings.
Engineering Prior to Community Development Board:
Review Fifth Street and Hamden Drive currently have metered City Parking in the Right of Way.
Neither the Demolition Plan nor the Site Plan demonstrate the existing City Parking.
Please show existing City street parking on the Demolition Plan and Site Plan. ""SEE
PAGE 55 ON DOCUMENT. RESPONSE: Existing Street Parking is now shown on
fhe demo p/an and is proposed for demotition and replacement with landscaping
per beach by design. Same as approved for Parcel Hotel " B".
Engineering Prior to Building Permit
Review Please provide the following notes to the plans:
- All utilities shall be cut and capped prior to demolition. The Wastewater Supervisor
shall be notified.
- All existing utilities shall be protected during demolition.
- Demolition shall not cause any service interruptions for other utility customers.
- Water meters, double-detector checks and backflow preventers are owned by the City
of Clearwater. The City shall remove and retain these items. ""SEE PAGE 54 ON
DOCUMENT. RESPONSE: Acknowledged
Engineering Prior to Building Permit:
Review The new driveways on Coronado and Fifth Street will eliminate City Parking. The
elimination of City Parking will require Parking Fees. Please contact Eric Wilson, the
Parking Systems Manager (727-562-4774) to determine the appropriate parking impact
fee. "'`SEE PAGE 55 ON DOCUMENT. RESPONSE: Acknowledged
Engineering Prior to Building Permit:
Review The restoration of City roadways and sidewalks shall be approved by City staff and meet
City standards. "*SEE PAGE 55 ON DOCUMENT. RESPONSE: Acknowledged
Engineering Prior to Building Permit:
Review Please provide information on the staging area and route for the construction materials
and equipment. *"SEE PAGE 55 ON DOCUMENT. RESPONSE: Acknowledged
Z
Response to Comments FLD2015=05016 � 2015
Engineering Prior to Building Permit:
Review Please apply for a right-of-way permit for any work on City Right of Way. The form can
be found online at:
<http://myclearwater.com/gov/depts/pwa/engin/FormsApplications.asp>. **SEE PAGE
55 ON DOCUMENT. RESPONSE: Acknowledged
Engineering Prior to Building Permit:
Review As per City of Clearwater Reclaimed Water System Ordinances, 32.351 and 32.376, use
of potable water for irrigation is prohibited. The irrigation system shall be hooked up to
the reclaimed water system that is available to this site. ``'`SEE PAGE 55 ON
DOCUMENT.RESPONSE: Acknowledged
Engineering Prior to Building Permit:
Review All new sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project should be built
up to standard, including A.D.A. standards (raised detectable tactile surfaces or
truncated domes per FDOT Indices #304 and #310). '`"SEE PAGE 55 ON DOCUMENT.
RESPONSE: Acknowledged
Engineering Prior to Certificate of Occupancy:
Review If any easements are intended to be vacated, they shall be recorded with the City. This
process can be lengthy; please contact Chuck Lane (727-562-4754) for any Easement
vacation requests. **SEE PAGE 55 ON DOCUMENT. RESPONSE: Acknowledged
Engineering General Conditions
Review Sheets C-02, C-03, C-04, C-05 and A2-1 were reviewed for General Engineering
criteria. The additional details provided in the plan set may have been necessary for
other departmental reviews to provide flexible development approval. Construction
details shall be reviewed more thoroughly prior to receipt of the Building Permit.
RESPONSE: Acknowledged
DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit review. Additional comments may be
forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. *"SEE PAGE 53 ON
DOCUMENT. RESPONSE: Acknowledged
Environmental General Notes:
Review DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be
forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application.
Offsite discharge of produced groundwater from dewatering shall comply with
dewatering guidelines from Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP),
F.A.C. 62-621(2). RESPONSE: Acknowledged
Additional permits from State agencies, such as the Southwest Florida Water
Management District or Florida Department of Environmental Protection, may be
required. Approval does not relieve the applicant from the requirements to obtain all
other required permits and authorizations. **SEE PAGE 2 ON DOCUMENT.
RESPONSE: Acknowledged
Environmental Prior to issuance of Building Permit:
Review Continue to provide erosion control measures on plan sheet and provide notes detailing
erosion control methods. '"`SEE PAGE 54 ON DOCUMENT. RESPONSE:
Acknowledged
Environmental Prior to issuance of Building Permit:
Review An Asbestos Survey is usually required prior to conducting any demolition or
renovations. Contact Pinellas County Air Quality (727/464-4422) for more information.
**SEE PAGE 54 ON DOCUMENT. RESPONSE: Acknowledged
3
Response to Comments FLD2015-05016 � 2015
Environmental Prior to issuance of Building Permit:
Review Provide storm water vault specifications showing the vault provides water quality
benefits and provide a vault maintenance schedule that has been signed and accepted
by the owner. **SEE PAGE 56 ON DOCUMENT. RESPONSE: Acknowledged
Fire Review FDC measures approximately 16 feet from supporting fire hydrant on the Coronado side
of the building. FDC shall be located no closer than 25 feet from the supporting fire
hydrant. Please acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB. **SEE PAGE 57 ON
DOCUMENT. RESPONSE: Acknowledged, revised on plans.
Fire Review This building is determined to meet the criteria of a High Rise Building as defined by the
Florida Fire Prevention Code 5th Edition, therefore the requirements of a High Rise
structure must be met. These requirements include, but are not limited to Fire Code
items such as: RESPONSE: Acknowledged
Fire Pump and generator if pump is electric, sprinkler system throughout with control
valve and water flow device on each floor, Class I Standpipe System, Fire Alarm using
voice/alarm communication, Central Fire Control Station, firefighter phone system,
Emergency lighting, and Standby Power as per NFPA 70, Pressurized Stairwells,
Stairwell marking and Elevator Lobbies. ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO C.D.B. "*SEE
PAGE 57 ON DOCUMENT. RESPONSE: Acknowledged
Fire Review Must test for if needed, to comply with City of Clearwater Ordinance No. 7617-06 sec.
47.053 Radio System Regulations for Buildings. Please acknowledge intent to comply
PRIOR TO CDB. **SEE PAGE 57 ON DOCUMENT. RESPONSE: Acknowledged
Fire Review Shall meet the requirements of NFPA 1 2012 edition chapter 16 sections 16.3.4.5 Stairs
and 16.3.5 Standpipes, respectively.
ACKNOW�EDGE PRIOR TO CDB. *"SEE PAGE 57 ON DOCUMENT. RESPONSE:
Acknowledged
Fire Review Tamper switches are required to be installed on the fire supply DDCV and must be
connected to the FACP.
ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO CDB. "*SEE PAGE 57 ON DOCUMENT. RESPONSE:
Acknowledged
Fire Review Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, they shall be installed,
completed and in service prior to construction as per NFPA-241. All underground fire
lines must be installed by a contractor with a class I, II or V license with separate plans
and permit. Please acknowledge prior to CDB. "*SEE PAGE 57 ON DOCUMENT.
RESPONSE: Acknowledged
Land Resource At time of building permit or demo permit a tree preservation plan will be required
Review showing how the palms in the City ROW will be protected throughout demolition and
construction, as well as an erosion control plan. "*SEE PAGE 58 ON DOCUMENT.
RESPONSE: Acknowledged
Land Resource Washingtonia Robusta is listed as a Category II invasive species on the Florida Exotic
Review Plant Pest Council list and is strongly not recommended. Revise to an alternative palm.
'`*SEE PAGE 60 ON DOCUMENT.RESPONSE: Revised.
Parks and Open space/recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final
Recreation plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is
Review recommended that you contact Debbie Reid at 727-562-4818 to calculate the
4
Response to Comments FLD2015-05016 � 2015
assessment. *'`SEE PAGE 2 ON DOCUMENT. RESPONSE: Acknowiedged
Parks and Correct site data table to reflect/add previous usage of property (number and types of
Recreation units). *`SEE PAGE 53 ON DOCUMENT.RESPONSE: See attached table for impact
Review fee calculations. Plan data table needs to reflect current and proposed conditions.
Planning Application page 2 of 8: The proposed amount of vehicular use area is listed and N/A
Review Parking Garage. This does not seem to be completely accurate as there appear to be
six surface parking spaces at the southeast corner of the site. Please clarify and correct
as needed. "*SEE PAGE 3 ON DOCUMENT. RESPONSE: 1,994 SF of vehicle use
and 10 % VUA = 194 SF added to the application and plans.
Planning Application page 2 of 8: The existing use is listed as parking and no buildings. I thought
Review there was still a hotel on the site. Further on the page it lists that there is 6,927 of
existing building. This is reiterated on page 11 of the narrative which provides that there
is a hotel and attached dwelling on the site. Please clarify. **SEE PAGE 3 ON
DOCUMENT. RESPONSE: Application revised.
Planning Application page 2 of 8: Clarify the amount of accessory use area proposed. The
Review application says 11,844 square feet which would be about 11 percent of the floor area
listed as 118,455 square feet. The narrative (page 12) provides that there is only 4,460
square feet of accessory spaces constituting 3.77 percent of the floor area. However,
118,455 square feet times 3.77 percent equals 3,919 square feet not 4,460 square feet.
We need to get all this buttoned down before CDB. No need to count exterior accessory
space nor do we need to count the exercise room, buffet areas or anything just for hotel
guests. Plus, when I add up 103,965 and 11,844 I get 115,809 square feet which I
notice is not 118,455. Please provide a breakdown of interior accessory spaces and
please make sure that all numbers add up and match across all documents including
page 12 of the narrative. ""SEE PAGE 3 ON DOCUMENT. RESPONSE: Application
has been revised to show 4,460 SF, or 3.77%, of Accessory space and 113,995 of
Principal use area, for a total of 118,455 SF of building area.
Planning Application page 3 of 8: The proposed number of parking spaces is listed as 200 where I
Review count 199 which also match the number of spaces when you total the numbers provided
on each of the three levels of parking. Your sheets, and I confirmed the count, at 55
space on Level 1 and 72 spaces each Levels 2 and 3. Now, there is one space that is
listed as a parking space on the second floor, a parallel space at the north end of the
building, which is on the third level but not numbered as a parking space. I am guessing
that this space should probably be included as a parking space, provided it meets the
minimum dimensional requirements of eight feet by 23 feet. If that is the case then there
are your 200 spaces. Either way, 166 x 1.2 actually equals 199.2 which we can round
down to 199 so the actual needed number of parking spaces is 199. **SEE PAGE 4 ON
DOCUMENT. RESPONSE: Revised to read a minimum of 199 spaces provided.
Planning General: Do you have an estimate on how many net new jobs may be created with the
Review proposal? "'*SEE PAGE 4 ON DOCUMENT. RESPONSE: Approx. 75 new jobs.
Planning General: Clarify how mechanical equipment will be located and screened from view.
Review **SEE PAGE 4 ON DOCUMENT. RESPONSE: The mechanical equipment is to be
located on the roof and screened behind 42" minimum height parapet walls.
Larger equipment shall be screened by louvered screening, as appropriate and
required.
Planning General: Clarify if valet parking will be provided for any component of the project. **SEE
Review PAGE 4 ON DOCUMENT. RESPONSE: valet parking may be used, but is not
required or calculated in determining the number of parking spaces.
S
Response to Comments FLD2015-05016 � 2015
Planning General: Clarify that existing overhead utilities adjacent and extending onto the site will
Review be removed and/or placed underground. **SEE PAGE 4 ON DOCUMENT. RESPONSE:
All onsite utilities will be relocated underground, and coordinated with Duke
Energy.
Planning Narrative page 11: The proposed 10 foot setback along Coronado Drive is actually
Review consistent with a Flexible Standard Development parameter so it is not totally accurate
to state that this setback is less that the T District requirement. What is really kicking this
into a Flexible Development level of review is the height and the reductions in setbacks
to zero feet for the drop-off driveway along Fifth Street. **SEE PAGE 10 ON
DOCUMENT. RESPONSE: Revised
Planning Narrative page 12: You mention that the parking at the fourth floor is pulled back. I
Review thought there was only three floors of parking. Please clarify and correct as needed.
**SEE PAGE 11 ON DOCUMENT. RESPONSE: Revised
Planning Gen. App. Criterion 1: It would probably be more accurate to note that while the property
Review to the north across Fifth Street does technically include a parking lot previously
approved Hotel B is proposed to replace that parking lot. It certainly would not hurt your
case. **SEE PAGE 14 ON DOCUMENT. RESPONSE: Revised
Planning
Review
Planning
Review
Planning
Review
Planning
Review
Planning
Review
Gen. App. Criteria 2 and 3: No comments. ''*SEE PAGE 14 ON DOCUMENT.
RESPONSE: Acknowledged
Gen. App. Criterion 4: Make sure that the parking count is accurate. **SEE PAGE 15 ON
DOCUMENT. RESPONSE: Acknowledged
Gen. App. Criteria 5 and 6: No comments. "``SEE PAGE 15 ON DOCUMENT.
RESPONSE: Acknowledged
The wrong criteria were used. This is not a Comp. Infill. You can use the criteria for
Overnight Accommodations per CDC Section 2-803.K. **SEE PAGE 16 ON
DOCUMENT. RESPONSE: Revised
BBD B.3: Provide the floorplate area of the building between 45 and 100 feet. *'`SEE
PAGE 23 ON DOCUMENT. RESPONSE: The typical floor plate between 45' and
100' is 17,880 SF per floor.
Planning BBD D.3: The requirement is a stepback of 1.5 feet for each foot of reduction in setback
Review plus the otherwise required 15 foot stepback. The reduction in setback is five feet from
15 feet to 10 feet. That will equate to 5 x 1.5 = 7.5. Then 7.5 + 15 = 22.5. . That means
we need a stepback of 22.5 feet along at least 75 percent of the west building fa�ade.
Just like in the diagram on page 70 of Beach by Design. **SEE PAGE 26 ON
DOCUMENT. RESPONSE: The main building tower has been revised to provide
the 22'6" stepback at 20' above BFE, as required. The garage wing of the building
is less than 35' in height and provides for a 20' stepback at the 20' height. The
overall building steps back, at 20' height, for a minimum of 75% along the
building's west frontage.
Planning
Review
Planning
Review
Planning
Review
BBD I: Bike racks would be nice. *"'SEE PAGE 32 ON DOCUMENT RESPONSE:
Added to plans.
Sheet A1 0 et.al: I am not seeing any north arrows on this or any other architectural site
plan sheet. Please add north arrows. *"SEE PAGE 39 ON DOCUMENT. RESPONSE:
Added to plans.
Sheet A2_1: Please provide setback dimensions to all structures including the surface
parking spaces on the south side of the site. "'SEE PAGE 40 ON DOCUMENT.
RESPONSE: Added to plans.
Planning Sheet A2 1: It looks like the drop-off driveway is partially within the Fifth Street right-of-
Review way. The driveway needs to be completely on the subject site. On that note, it looks like
the architectural site plans (including A-1) and the civil site plans don't quite match up
6
Response to Comments FLD2015-05016 � 2015
with regard to layout. Please correct this. ""SEE PAGE 40 ON DOCUMENT.
RESPONSE: Plans revised to coordinate with Civil Plans.
Pianning Sheet A2 1: Please dimension the drop-off driveway. **SEE PAGE 40 ON DOCUMENT.
Review RESPONSE: Please see Civil drawings for actual drive and other dimensions.
Architectural plan has been revised to coordinate with Civil plans.
Planning Sheet A2 1: Please provide a few typical parking space dimensions for parking spaces
Review on each floor of the parking garage. Also, makes that you've got dimensions on the
handicap spaces and access aisles. "*SEE PAGE 40 ON DOCUMENT. RESPONSE:
Dimensions provided.
Planning Sheet A2 2: Please provide a dimension on the parallel parking space on the north side
Review of the parking garage. "`SEE PAGE 41 ON DOCUMENT. RESPONSE: Dimensions
provided.
Planning Sheet A2 2: There is one dimension shown on the north side of the building at 128.5
Review feet. I believe this is probably not accurate and there seems to be some articulation of
this fa�ade within the listed dimension. Please clarify and correct. As I recall, we agreed
to allow one fa�ade only to exceed the 100 foot limit along the east side of the site for
purposes of accommodating the ramp for the garage. "'SEE PAGE 41 ON DOCUMENT.
RESPONSE: The 128' dimension occurs at the ground level and within an arcade
formed by, and within the building above. As such that wall line does not show
on the exterior face of the building.
Planning Sheet A5_2: Please provide a little bit of clarification with regard to the green screens
Review proposed over the parking garage facades. Also, you have two sheets numbered A5 2.
We may want to do make sure that each sheet has a unique number. Something like
eleventy-seventy-sixth maybe *"SEE PAGE 47 ON DOCUMENT. RESPONSE: The
Green screens are to be open trellis structures to allow for planting to shield the
garage and to provide additional visual interest to an otherwise long and
repetitive garage fa�ade. The sheets have been repaginated. That sheet was to
be sheet A5_2b.
Planning Sheet A5_3: Clarify if there are any rooftop activity spaces proposed (not counting the
Review pool and patio on the fourth floor). I didn't notice any but I thought I'd double check.
""SEE PAGE 51 ON DOCUMENT. RESPONSE: There are no rooftop activity
spaces other than that on the 4"' floor, above the garages.
Planning Sheet C-1: See my comment regarding the number of parking on page 3 of 8 of the
Review application. Just make sure that all the numbers are accurate and the same across
sheets and pages. **SEE PAGE 53 ON DOCUMENT. RESPONSE: Acknowledged
Planning Sheet C-03: Please provide a dimension the sidewalk along Coronado Drive. "'SEE
Review PAGE 55 ON DOCUMENT. RESPONSE: Acknowledged
Planning Sheet C-03: I would like to see if we make all the adjacent sidewalks seven feet wide
Review like we did on the hotel to the north. "'*SEE PAGE 55 ON DOCUMENT. RESPONSE:
Revised to 7'.
Planning Sheet C-03: Please provide all sight visibility triangles. They seem to missing at the
Review southeast driveway. In addition, they seem to be misplaced on the two driveways along
Fifth Street. **SEE PAGE 55 ON DOCUMENT. RESPONSE: Added
Planning Sheet C-03: Please provide a different paving material or pattern where driveways cross
Review sidewalks. "'`SEE PAGE 55 ON DOCUMENT. RESPONSE: Added
Planning Sheet C-03: Clarify if any improvements are proposed Lot 1A. '`*SEE PAGE 55 ON
Review DOCUMENT. RESPONSE: No improvements are proposed on lot 1A with this
application.
Planning Sheet LS.2: Please limit the use of sod to those areas used for storm water facilities.
Review '`"'SEE PAGE 59 ON DOCUMENT. RESPONSE: Acknowledged
%
Response to Comments FLD2015-05016 � 2015
Planning 1. Please note that additional comments may be generated at or subsequent to the DRC
Review meeting based on responses to DRC comments.
Please carefully review the listed request. It is ultimately the responsibly of the applicant
to ensure that the request reflects what is wanted.
In order to be reviewed by the CDB on July 21, 2015 15 sets (revised as needed) must
be submitted no later than noon June 12, 2015. '`'`SEE PAGE 146 ON DOCUMENT.
RESPONSE: Acknowledged
Solid Waste Please explain the level of service and how this will be handled. 4 yard roll-outs?
Review Staging area? RESPONSE: The 4-yard roll outs are to be stored in the solid waste
room and rolled out, by hotel staff, onto a staging area, at the street, for pick-up.
Afterward the dumpsters are returned to the solid waste staging room.
Solid Waste Please explain the level of service and how this will be handled. 4 yard roll-outs?
Review Staging area? ""SEE PAGE 40 ON DOCUMENT. RESPONSE: The 4-yard roll outs
are to be stored in the solid waste room and rolled out, by hotel staff, onto a
staging area, at the street, for pick-up. Afterward the dumpsters are returned to
the solid waste staging room.
Stormwater
Review
Stormwater
Review
Stormwater
Review
Stormwater
Review
Traffic
Engineering
Review
Traffic
Engineering
Review
8
Prior to building Permit
Please submit tide flex valve detail. **SEE PAGE 56 ON DOCUMENT. RESPONSE:
Acknowledged
Prior to Building Permit
Ensure all roof drains are directed to the stormwater vault. ""SEE PAGE 57 ON
DOCUMENT. RESPONSE: Acknowledged
Prior to Building Permit
Please submit a full drainage packet with the building permit application. **SEE PAGE
62 ON DOCUMENT. RESPONSE: Acknowledged
Prior to Building Permit
Please provide a geotech report for correct location. **SEE PAGE 114 ON DOCUMENT.
RESPONSE: Acknowledged
Prior to a building permit:
Strategically place convex mirrors where appropriate to aid motorisYs sight visibility at
blind spots such as walls etc. per City's Community Development Code, Section 3-1402.
A. '`*SEE PAGE 40 ON DOCUMENT. RESPONSE: Acknowledged
Prior to a Building Permit:
The minimum clear height throughout the garage shall be seven feet zero inches and
shall be eight feet two inches for van-accessible handicapped parking spaces including
ingress and egress drive aisles to these spaces. RESPONSE: Acknowledged
Pedestrian - vehicular conflicts shall be avoided whenever possible. Where unavoidable,
active warning devices such as traffic signals or flashing warning signs/devices and/or
physical barriers such as vehicular actuated gates shall be provided to warn the
pedestrian and slow vehicular traffic. RESPONSE: Acknowledged
Response to Comments FLD2015-05016 � 2015
Lighting levels in parking garages having public access shall meet or exceed the current
minimum Illuminating Engineering Society (IES) standards. RESPONSE:
Acknowledged
All electrical conduits, pipes, downspouts, columns or other features that could be
subject to impact from vehicular traffic shall be protected from impact damage with pipe
guards or similar measures. Measures used for protection shall not encroach into any
parking space. RESPONSE: Acknowledged
All of the above is per City's Community Development Code, Section 3-1402. I. **SEE
PAGE 40 ON DOCUMENT. RESPONSE: Acknowledged
Traffic Prior to a CDB:
Engineering Provide a turning template of a scaled passenger vehicle (AASHTO standard) both
Review entering and exiting the garage in a forward direction without hitting any objects or going
onto opposing lanes. (City's Community Development Code, Section 3-1402. I.) "*SEE
PAGE 55 ON DOCUMENT. RESPONSE: Provided
Traffic
Engineering
Review
Traffic
Engineering
Review
Traffic
Engineering
Review
Traffic
Engineering
Review
6/1/2015
9
Prior to a Building Permit:
At the bottom of the ramp where it intersects with the drive aisle, provide stop bar with
the word stop on the pavement per current Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices.
(Community Development Code, Section 3-1402) "*SEE PAGE 55 ON DOCUMENT.
RESPONSE: Added to plan.
Prior to a Building Permit:
Strategically erect "do not enter" and "wrong way" signs for one-way drive aisles per
current Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. ""SEE PAGE 55 ON DOCUMENT.
RESPONSE: Acknowledged
Prior to CDB:
Correctly show 20' x 20' sight visibility triangles at all driveway connections to S Hamden
Dr and 5th St. There shall be no objects in the sight triangle which do not meet the City's
acceptable vertical height criteria at a level between 30 inches above grade and eight
feet above grade.
(City's Community Development Code, Section 3-904). ""SEE PAGE 55 ON
DOCUMENT. RESPONSE: Acknowledged
Prior to CDB:
Provide Architectural and Civil site plans that reflect each other. ""SEE PAGE 55 ON
DOCUMENT. RESPONSE: Acknowledged
DRC_Comments
405 & 415 Coronado Drive (PARCEL C) � 2015
Attachment B
(Parcel "C") Description of Requests
1. Building Height to 100'-0" above BFE 12'
2. Request building setback at ground elevation:
Front West = 10.00
Front North = 15.00
Front East =15.00
Side South = 10.00
3. Request sidewalk & pavement setback:
Front West = 0.0 (To Plaza Area)
Front North = 0.0 (To Pavement / Sidewalk)
Front East = N/A
Side South = 6.00 to (Parking Area)
4. Two year development agreement
1
405 & 415 Coronado Drive I 2015
Attachment C
General Applicability Criteria
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale,
bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which
it is located.
West: The property to the west includes city right of way Coronado Drive
existing hotels and parking areas.
North: The property to the north includes a city right of way 5th Street and
existing parking lot. (Approved for a new Hotel Building)
East: The property to the east includes a city right of way Hamden Drive and
boat docks.
South: The property to the south includes an existing hotel and parking area.
The scale, bulk, coverage and density of the proposed project are in keeping with
the Design Guidelines set forth in Beach by Design for the Beach Walk District.
The proposed hotel project maintains the existing use, and maintains a maximum
height of 100'-0" foot above BFE=12.
The proposed project will enhance this area of the beach in a number of ways,
including:
• Removal of an existing older hotel/multifamily building not consistent with
Beach by Design criteria.
• Construction of a new hotel consistent with new City code and Beach by
Design criteria.
• Upgrade in landscaping from a minimal condition, to areas of planting and
grassed open space and hardscape areas.
• Providing a destination hotel on Clearwater Beach.
• Setting an example in a Beach by Design district that will likely inspire new
development in the area.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate
development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair
the value thereof.
1
The proposed development maintains an existing appropriate land use
according to Beach by Design with a limited service hotel that caters to families
and established clientele. The project includes adequate off-street parking. The
new project will provide a positive example along the Coronado Drive to serve
as a catalyst for redevelopment of new hotels and mixed use development. This
will have a positive impact on the value of the adjacent land and also provide
clientele for the surrounding restaurants and retail shops.
405 & 415 Coronado Drive I 2015
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of
persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
The proposed development will be designed meet all state, federal and local
codes with respect to fire safety, potable water, sanitary sewer, traffic and
pedestrian safety. New sidewalks will be installed around the site perimeter.
The proposed hotel maintains the existing use and does not introduce any new
businesses that may adversely affect the health of persons residing or working in
the area. The proposed structure will comply as required with applicable codes
including the Florida Building Code, the Life Safety Code and the Florida Fire
Prevention Code.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
The results of a traffic study performed for this development indicates the project
will not cause significant increased traffic congestion. The development will
include a code compliant parking count (200 parking spaces) which can be
significantly increased by making use of valet parking during high occupancy
periods.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of
the immediate vicinity proposed for development.
The proposed redevelopment project will improve the visual appeal near the north
entry to Beach Walk and South Clearwater Beach. The architectural style
integrates a beach contemporary design which is appropriate and aesthetically
pleasing for the Small Motel District.
The development maintains the existing use of the property and is consistent with
the properties to the north, south & west and is a targeted use in the Beach walk
district.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects,
including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation
impacts on adjacent properties.
The buitding includes enhanced design elements on the farade as required by
Beach by Design including adequate windows, vertical and horizontal plane
changes and recommended color palette. The acoustic and olfactory impacts are
minimized by providing all of the parking within an enclosed parking garage.
Hours of operation will be 24/7 which is consistent with surrounding properties
catering to the tourist industry. The pool area has been located on the west side
of the building, shielding the residential areas to the east from potential noise
associated with outdoor pool and patio areas.
2
1 " ~
405 & 415 Coronado Drive (PARCEL C) � 2015
Attachment D
Applicable Flexibility Criteria
Overnight Accommodation criteria pursuant to CDC Section 2-803
The proposal supports the speci�c Overnight Accommodation criteria pursuant to CDC
Section 2-803.J as follows:
1. With the exception of those properties located on Clearwater Beach, the parcel
proposed for development shall front on but shall not involve direct access to a major
arterial street unless no other means of access would be possible.
The parcel proposed for development is located on Clearwater Beach therefore;
this criterion is not strictly applicable to the application.
2. Height: The increased height results in an improved site plan andlor improved design
and appearance.
The site is the recipient of 100 units from the Reserve. It is generally understood
that a viable overnight accommodation project on the Beach requires additional
density and, in turn certain amounts of flexibility with regard to setbacks, height
and other development parameters. The requested increase in height to 100 feet
is mitigated by building step backs of up to 100 feet and is anticipated in this
area of Beach by Design for buildings which meet the requirements of the Design
Guidelines and which have acquired additional density through mechanisms
such as the Reserve. For example the bulk of the building steps back at the fifth
floor at the southwest corner at least 84 feet. In fact, one of the strategies of
Beach by Design is to "optimize project densities" on the Beach. In short, the
number of units directly affects the form of the building vis-a-vis height. In
order to create a viable hotel with the number of proposed units the requested
level of flexibility is needed. As such, the proposal is a reasonably expected
design solution consistent with established and approved uses on adjacent
properties and all applicable Design Guidelines of Beach by Design. Therefore,
the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section.
3. Signs: No sign of any kind is designed or located so that any portion of the sign is
more than six feet above the finished grade of the front lot line of the parcel proposed
for development unless such signage is a part of an approved comprehensive sign
program.
A sign package has not been submitted yet although the applicant has committed
to meeting the requirements of the CDC with regard to signage.
4. Front setback:
a. The reduced setback shall contribute to a more active and dynamic street life;
b. The reduced setback shall result in an improved site plan through the provision of
a more efficient off-street parking area, and/or improved building design and
appearance; and
c. The reduced setback will not result in a loss of landscaped area, as those areas
being diminished by the setback reduction will be compensated for in other areas
through a Comprehensive Landscape Plan.
1
1 �
405 & 415 Coronado Drive (PARCEL C) � 2015
The proposed front setbacks of 10 to 15 feet to the proposed building are
consistent with those as otherwise required as part of a Level I Flexible
Standard Development review. The front setback reductions are limited only
to pavement and sidewalk areas located around the building. The reduction
in pavement along the north side of the site along 5th Street will
accommodate a driveway providing for a drop off area for hotel guests. In
addition, a sidewalk/patio a minimum of 7 feet in width will extend along a
portion of the north and west fagade providing opportunities for seating and
outdoor dining. This feature will be located five to seven feet from the north
and west property lines. While perimeter landscaping is not required
landscape buffers along the east and west front property lines are
provided. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section.
5. Side and rear setbacks:
a. The reduced setback does not prevent access to the rear of any building by
emergency vehicles and/or personnel;
b. The reduced setback results in an improved site plan through the provision of a
more e�cient off-street parking area, and/or improved building design and
appearance; and
c. The reduced setback will not result in a loss of landscaped area, as those areas
being diminished by the setback reduction will be compensated for in other areas
through a Comprehensive Landscape Plan.
The provided side setback of 10 feet is consistent with that as otherwise
required as part of a Level I Flexible Standard Development
review. Therefore, this criterion is not strictly applicable to the application.
6. Off-street parking:
a. The proposed development contains no more than 130 rooms; and
b. The proposed development is within 1,000 feet of an existing public parking
garage with documented available capacity.
The proposed 166-room hotel requires 199 parking spaces at 1.2 spaces per
room where a minimum of 199 spaces are proposed. As such no request for a
reduction in parking is included with the proposal. Therefore, this criterion
is not strictly applicable to the application.
7. The design of all buildings shall comply with the Tourist District site and
architectural design guidelines in Section 3-501, as applicable.
The proposal is fully compliant with all applicable portions of the Design
Guidelines of Beach by Design. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this
CDC Section.
8. Lot area and/or width: The reduction shall not result in a building which is out of
scale with existing buildings in the immediate vicinity.
The subject property is 57,564 square feet in area and averages approximately
145 feet wide which exceeds the otherwise required lot area and width
parameters. The proposal is consistent with these Code provisions. Therefore,
this criterion is not strictly applicable to the application.
2
405 & 415 Coronado Drive (PARCEL C) � 2015
9. The parcel proposed for development shall, if located within the Coastal Storm Area,
have a hurricane evacuation plan requiring the use close when a hurricane watch is
posted; and
The provision of a hurricane evacuation plan has been made a condition of
approval of this application. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC
Section.
10. A development agreement must be approved by the city council pursuant to F.S. �§
163.3221-163.3243 and Community Development Code Section 4-606 if the
development proposal exceeds the base density andlor base F.A.R. established for the
underlying Future Land Use designation. The development agreement shall:
a. Comply with all applicable requirements of the "Rules Concerrting the
Administration of the Countywide Future Land Use Plan" as they pertain to
alternative density/intensiry, and as amended from time to time;
b. Be recorded with the clerk of the circuit court pursuant to F.S. � 163.3239, with a
copy filed with the property appraiser's o�ce, and a copy submitted to the PPC
and CPA for receipt and filing within 14 days after recording; and
c. Have its development lirnitatio�s memorialized in a deed i-estriction, which shall
be recorde�l ira the Offici�al Records of Pinellas Courzty prior to the issuance of
uny building perrnit for the c�vernight accomrr�odations use.
On , 2014, the City Council approved the allocation of up to 100 units
from the Hotel Density Reserve under Beach by Design (Case No. HDA2013-
08006) and adopted a resolution to the same effect which included the
approval of a development agreement. Therefore, the proposal is consistent
with this CDC Section.
11. Accessory Uses:
a. Accessory uses must be incidental, subordinate, and customarily accessory to
overnight accommodations.
Proposed accessory uses are limited to general commercial on the first level
and a gift shop concession space on the 4th floor. An exercise room and a pool
and outdoor patio and are considered as subordinate and customarily
accessory overnight accommodations. Therefore, the proposal is consistent
with this CDC Section.
b. The following shall apply to required parking for accessory uses:
1. Accessory uses located within the building interior may occupy between
I S percent and 20 percent of the gross floor area of the development,
but only when additional parking is provided for that portion of the
accessory uses which exceeds I S percent. The required amount of
parking shall be calculated by using the minimum off-street parking
development standard for the most intensive accessory use(s). Where
there is a range of parking standards, the lowest number of spaces
allowed shall be used to calculate the additional amount of off-street
parking required for the project. In projects where the interior
�
405 & 415 Coronado Drive (PARCEL C) � 2015
accessory uses exceed 20 percent of the building gross floor area, all
interior accessory uses shall be considered additional primary uses for
purposes of calculating development potential and parking
requirements.
The proposed accessory use area constitutes approximately 3.77
percent of the gross floor area of the hotel. Therefore, this criterion
is not strictly applicable to the application.
2. Regardless of the gross floor area percentage, overnight
accommodations with fewer than SO rooms that have a full service
restaurant shall comply with the parking standards for the restaurant
use as contained in Table 2-803. The lowest number of spaces allowed
shall be used to calculate the additional amount of off-street parking
required for the restaurant.
The proposal includes a hotel with more than 50 rooms. Therefore,
this criterion is not strictly applicable to the application.
c. In addition to the requirements above, for those projects that request additional
rooms from the Hotel Density Reserve established in Beach by Design and whose
interior accessory uses are between ten percent and 15 percent of the gross floor
area of the proposed building, density shall be calculated as follows:
1. Calculate the maximum number of units allowed by the base density;
2. Calculate the maximum number of units that may be allocated from the
Hotel Density Reserve established in Beach by Design;
3. Add the figures determined in i. and ii. to determine the total number of
units allowed for the site;
4
4. Divide the total number of units allowed, as calculated in iii., by the
total land area to determine the resulting units per acre for the project
site;
5. Determine the total floor area of all interior accessory uses exceeding
ten percent of the gross floor area of the proposed building;
6. Subtract the figure determined in v. from the total land area, and divide
this difference by 43,560 to determine the net acreage;
7. Multiply the net acreage derived in vi. by the applicable resulting units
per acre figure determined in iv. The resulting product is the maximum
number of rooms allowable for the project.
8. The final allocation of rooms from the Hotel Density Reserve shall be
determined by multiplying the net acreage determined in vi. by the base
density and subtracting this product from the maximum number of
rooms allowable for the project as determined in vii.
The proposed accessory use area constitutes approximately 3.77
percent of the gross floor area of the hotel. Therefore, this criterion
is not strictly applicable to the application.
405 & 415 Coronado Drive (PARCEL C) � 2015
d. Signage for any accessory use shall be subordinate to and incorporated into the
primary freestanding signage for the overnight accommodation use. In no case
shall more than 25 percent of the sign area be dedicated to the accessory uses.
A sign package has not been submitted yet although the applicant has
committed to meeting the requirements of the CDC with regard to signage.
e. Those developments that have obtained additional density from the Destination
Resort Density Pool established in Beach by Design are not subject to the
requirements set forth in Sections 2-803.LIl.a—d.
The proposal includes units obtained through the Reserve. Therefore, this
criterion is not strictly applicable to the application.
�
, �
Coronado Dr. (PARCEL C) `2015
Attachment E
Beach by Design Criteria
A. Density:
DESIGN RESPONSE:
The project will maintain an overnight accommodation density of 126 units per
acre based on a 1.32 acre parcel. This includes 66 base density units plus 100
additional units requested from the Hotel Density Reserve via a Development
Agreement. The total number of units proposed for overnight accommodations is
166
B. Height & Separation:
DESIGN RESPONSE:
1. Hei_qht:
The highest base flood elevation on site is (AE) 12 feet. The maximum
allowable building height is 100'-0" above the base flood elevation. The proposed
building height is 100' 0" above the base flood elevation, to top of roof, and 112'-
0" to top of roof top mechanical and stair towers.
2. Separation:
The Hyatt Hotel, to the north of the property is over 100 feet in height.
Proposed building is 140 feet approximately 300 feet from the Hyatt Towers.
Additionally The Hyatt is the only building within 500 feet that is over 100 feet tall.
The new Adams Mark site to the south is slated to be over 100 feet and is
approximately 900 feet from the site. The proposed Wyndham property to the
north is within the 800 foot distance parameter but is over 500 feet from our
proposed building. Therefore, per the currently planned and approved buildings
in the vicinity, there will be no more than two structures over 100 feet in height
within 500 feet and there will be no more than four structures over 100 feet tall,
within the 800 feet limit.
3. Floor plate:
a. Between 45 feet in height and 100' there is no part of the floorplate that
exceeds 25,000 square feet The floor plates are 17,880 SF.
b. The building does not exceed 100 feet in height,
c. The mass and scale of the design creates a stepped and tiered effect and
the maximum building envelope above 45 feet is 56%; significantly below the
75% allowance for buildings with units allocated from the Hotel Pool.
C. Design, Scale and Mass of Building:
1
Coronado Dr. (PARCEL C) � 2015
1. Buildings with a footprint of greater than 5000 square feet or a single
dimension of greater than one hundred (100) feet will be constructed so
that no more than two (2) of the three (3) building dimensions in the
vertical or horizontal planes are equal in length. For this purpose, equal
in length means that the two lengths vary by less than forty (40%) of the
shorter of the two (2) lengths. The horizontal plan measurements relate
to the footprint of the building.
DESIGN RESPONSE:
The massing of the proposed building is comprised of an "L" shaped tower with
each leg approximately 65' wide by 160' long and 70' tall, sitting on a 3-story 35'
tall parking base, and intersecting at the corner of 5rh and Coronado. The 3-story
parking garage extends southward along Coronado Dr. 180+ feet beyond the end
of the residential portion of the building.
The intent of this portion of Beach by Design is to avoid boxy static building
designs; this building incorporates significant movement and massing articulation
and provides for a varied and energetic massing design.
See attached plans and elevations,
2. No plane of a building may continue uninterrupted for greater than one
hundred linear feet (100'). For the purpose of this standard, interrupted
means an offset of greater than five feet (5').
DESIGN RESPONSE:
The proposed building design adds many horizontal steps to three of the building
facades such that no one surface is longer than 100 feet without a break in the
fa�ade. See attached plans and elevations; there is an exception to this for the
southern parking ramp, located on the interior of the site.
The ramps are longer than 100 feet and notching the building is not practical
given the narrow dimension of the property and our desire to maintain the
recommended 10 ` side yard setback. Adding a building offset at this fa�ade
would either reduce the side setback to 5' or reduce the parking on each of the
parking levels and require an additional level of parking and a taller garage
podium. The 140' long section occurs on an interior, secondary fa�ade of the
building.
We visually broke up the length of this one area of the building with articulated
openings and decorative concrete wall panels. This portion of the building is also
the lowest, at 30; and least imposing on the surrounding properties.
The Coronado and Hamden stepback guidelines, all but, necessitate a maximum
three story parking structure to achieve the 20 foot stepback at the 20 foot height.
3. At least sixty percent (60%) of any elevation will be covered with
windows or architectural decoration. For the purpose of this standard,
2
Coronado Dr. (PARCEL C) � 2015
an elevation is that portion of a building that is visible from a particular
point outside the parcel proposed for development.
DESIGN RESPONSE:
In the proposed elevation design, a significant portion of each farade is
composed of windows, balconies, green screens and articulated fa�ade elements.
The result is that over 60% of each fa�ade is covered in windows and/or
architectural decoration.
See attached plans and elevations
4. No more than sixty percent (60%) of the theoretical maximum building
envelope located above forty-five feet (45') will be occupied by a
building. However, in those instances where an overnight
accommodations use on less than 2.0 acres that has been allocated
additional density via the Hotel Density Reserve, no more than seventy-
five percent (75%) of the theoretical maximum building envelope located
above forty-five feet (45') may be occupied by a building unless the
property is located between Gulfview Boulevard and the Gulf of Mexico,
then no more than 70% may be occupied by a building.
DESIGN RESPONSE:
The proposed design occupies approximately 56 % of the "Theoretical Building
Envelope" above 45 : This is significantly less than the allowable 75%.
5. The height and mass of buildings will be correlated to: (1) the
dimensional aspects of the parcel of the parcel proposed for
development and (2) adjacent public spaces such as streets and parks.
DESIGN RESPONSE:
The building height is maintained at 100; as dictated in Beach by Design. The
height and mass of the building meets the design standards of Beach by Design.
The massing of the building allows for landscape buffer areas of 15 feet on
Hamden Dr., 15' along 5th Street, and 10' to 20' along Coronado Dr. In addition to
the greenspace surrounding the building the landscape design concept calls for
10' wide public sidewalks, hardscape plazas at the hotel entry and hotel retail
entry.
See attached plans and elevations,
6. Buildings may be designed for a vertical or horizontal mix of permitting
uses.
DESIGN RESPONSE:
The building will be designed to provide the dining, hotel related retail, and a mix
of overnight accommodation space, typical for a limited service hotel. The
proposed hotel retail and restaurant uses are intended strictly as accessory uses,
3
Coronado Dr. (PARCEL C) � 2015
to support the needs of hotel guests, and are 3.77%; within the 15% of Gross
Floor Area accessory allowance.
D. Setbacks & Stepbacks:
1. Rights-of-way.
The area between the building and the edge of the pavement as existing
and planned should be sufficiently wide to create a pedestrian-friendly
environment. The distances from structures to the edge of the right-of-way
should be:
DESIGN RESPONSE:
a) Fifteen feet (15') along arterials, and (Proposed 10.00' to 20' on Coronado
Drive) and 15' on Hamden Drive. Hamden and Coronado both have a 60'
wide ROW. The 15' setback on Hamden is prescribed in BbD, and along
with the 15' setback gives nearly 30' buffer from the building to the curb.
Along Coronado Dr. we are requesting a minimum 10' setback. This
setback occurs only in a few locations, given the curve on Coronado. The
building average setback on Coronado is approximately 17 feet.
b) Twelve feet (12') along local streets. (Proposed 15.00' on 5rh Street)
The 5th Street setback is greater than the 12' setback prescribed in BbD.
This fa�ade also mirrors the 15' setback on Parcel B, giving a 90' building
separation at the first three floors and increasing to nearly 105 feet at the
tower elevations.
2. Side and Rear Setbacks
Side and rear setbacks shall be governed by the provisions of the Tourist
District of the Community Development Code unless otherwise prescribed
in the applicable Character District provisions contained in Section II.,
Future Land Use.
DESIGN RESPONSE:
10' setback proposed.
3. Coronado Drive Setbacks and Stepbacks.
To reduce upper story massing along the street and ensure a human scale
street environment, buildings using the hotel density reserve along
Coronado Drive and Hamden Drives shall be constructed in accordance
with the following:
a. Buildings constructed with a front setback of
fifteen feet (15') or more shall stepback with a
minimum depth of fifteen feet (15') from the
setback line at a height not more than twenty-five
4
Coronado Dr. (PARCEL C) � 2015
feet (25').
DESIGN RESPONSE:
Along Hamden Drive, the proposed building is setback back 15' from the ROW
line and has an additional 15' stepback at 20' (above BFE) for 100 % of the
building frontage. Please see Elevations, plans, and isometric massing study.
b. Buildings constructed with a front setback greater
than or equal to ten feet (10') and less than fifteen
feet (15') shall stepback at a height not more than
twenty feet (20'). The required stepback/ setback
ratio is one and one-half feet (1.5') for every one
foot (1') reduction in setback in addition to the
minimum stepback of fifteen feet (15').
DESIGN RESPONSE;
Along Coronado Drive, the proposed building has a minimum setback of 10' and
correspondingly the building is stepped back an additional 22 =6"' at the requisite
20' height (above BFE) for approximately 76% of the building frontage. (75%
minimum is prescribed under Beach by Design.) Please see Elevations, plans,
and isometric massing study.
As described above, the 3 story garage extends nearly 180 feet beyond the hotel
proper, along Coronado Dr. While the design proposes to step the main
structure of the building at the 20' height, as required by Beach by Design, we
are proposing to add some architectural embellishments, greenscreens, which
extend 8' above the required 20' cutoff. The green screens serve to break up the
long horizontal mass of the building, create a more varied, softer pedestrian
experience, and shield a portion of the exposed parking; exposed because of the
stepback requirements.
c. Buildings constructed with a front setback of less
than ten feet (10') shall provide a building stepback
required stepback/ setback ratio is two and one-half
feet (2.5') for every one foot (1') reduction in setback in addition to the
minimum stepback of fifteen feet (15').
DESIGN RESPONSE:
N/A
d. To achieve upper story facade variety and
articulation, additional stepbacks may be required.
To avoid a monotonous streetscape, a building
shall not replicate the stepback configuration of the
neighboring buildings including those across
5
Coronado Dr. (PARCEL C) I 2015
rights-of-way.
DESIGN RESPONSE:
The neighboring buildings a/ong Coronado Drive are /ow rise buildings and
the proposed design does not mimic or mirror the existing buildings.
e. Required stepbacks shall span a minimum of 75%
of the building frontage width.
DESIGN RESPONSE:
The required stepbacks span approximately 76% of the building frontage along
Coronado Drive and 100 % on Hamden Drive. The proposed design brings
certain appropriate and reasonable portions of the building forward to create
appropriate mass, presence and a sense of entry along Coronado and Hamden
Drives.
E. Street-Level Facades
The human scale and aesthetic appeal of street-level
facades, and their relationship to the sidewalk, are essential to a
pedestrian-friendly environment. Accordingly:
1. at least sixty percent (60°/a) of the street level facades of
buildings used for nonresidential purposes which abut a
public street or pedestrian access way, will be transparent.
For the purpose of this standard:
a) street level facade means that portion of a building
facade from ground level to a height of twelve feet
�12')
DESIGN RESPONSE:
At least 60 % of the street level facades are transparent. The facades include
significant amount of glazed storefront at the building entry and accessory
spaces on Coronado and 5th, as well as the Porte Cochere and building entrance
on 5th, and along Hamden Drive the view into the garage is decoratively
screened with metal green screening. Additionally, as defined below, the
buildings are setback approximately 15 feet or more from all three street front
facades, so the streetscapes are effectively 100 % transparent. See attached
plans and elevations,
b) transparent means windows or doors that allow pedestrians to see
into:
i. the building, or
6
Coronado Dr. (PARCEL C) � 2015
ii. landscaped or hardscaped courtyard or plazas, where street
level facades are set back at least fifteen feet (15') from the edge of
the sidewalk and the area between the sidewalk and the facade is a
landscaped or hardscaped courtyard
DESIGN RESPONSE:
The buildings step back 15 feet or more from all three street front facades, so the
streetscapes are effectively 100 % transparent. See attached plans and
elevations,
c) parking structures should utilize architectural details and design
elements such a false recessed windows, arches, planter boxes, metal
grillwork, etc. instead of transparent alternatives. When a parking
garage abuts a public road or other public place, it will be designed
such that the function of the building is not readily apparent except at
points of ingress and egress.
DESIGN RESPONSE:
The design proposes decoratively screened and articulated garage openings on
the first two levels. At the third level we propose undecorated garage openings,
however, the openings will still be modulated to coordinate with the general
rhythm and pattern of the other building fa�ade openings and windows. The
openings in the parking area at the 4rh floor level is pulled back minimally 15 feet
from the face of the building, effectively hiding the openings from pedestrian and
higher levels.
See attached plans and elevations,
2. Window coverings, and other opaque materials may cover
not more than 10% of the area of any street-level window
in a nonresidential building that fronts on a public right-of way.
DESIGN RESPONSE:
Not more than 10% of the area of any street-level windows are opaqued,
3. Building entrances should be aesthetically inviting and
easily identified. Goods for sale will not be displayed outside of a building,
except as a permitted temporary use. This standard does not
apply to outdoor food service establishments.
DESIGN RESPONSE:
Acknowledged,
4. Awnings and other structures that offer pedestrians cover
from the elements are recommended. Awnings help define
7
Coronado Dr. (PARCEL C) � 2015
entryways and provide storefront identity to both
pedestrians and drivers.
DESIGN RESPONSE:
The design proposes cantilevered awnings and canopies along the Coronado
hotel entry and accessory area facades as well as a significant canopy over the
Porte Cochere on 5th Street. These fa�ade articulations will serve to identify the
available hotel activity areas and entrances.
See attached plans and elevations
F. Parking Areas
To create a well-defined and aesthetically appealing street
boundary, all parking areas will be separated from public rights of
way by a landscaped decorative wall, fence or other opaque
landscape treatment of not less than three feet (3') and not more
than three and one-half feet (3'/z') in height. Surface parking areas
that are visible from public streets or other public places will be
landscaped such that the parking areas are defined more by their
landscaping materials than their paved areas when viewed from
adjacent property. The use of shade trees is encouraged in parking lots.
However, care should be taken to choose trees that do not drop excessive
amounts of leaves, flowers, or seeds on the vehicles below. Entrances to
parking areas should be clearly marked in order to avoid confusion and
minimize automobile-pedestrian
conflicts. Attractive signage and changes to the texture of the road (such
as pavers) are recommended. When a parking garage abuts a public road
or other public place, it will be designed such that the function of the
building is
not readily apparent except at points of ingress and egress.
DESIGN RESPONSE;
The design proposes decoratively screened and articulated garage openings on
the first two levels. At the third level we propose undecorated garage openings,
however, the openings will still be modulated to coordinate with the general
rhythm and pattern of the other building farade openings and windows. The
openings in the parking area at the 4th floor level is pulled back 15-20 feet from
the face of the building, effectively hiding the openings from pedestrian and
higher levels.
See attached plans and elevations,
G. Signage
Signage is an important contributor to the overall character
of a place. However, few general rules apply to signage.
S
Coronado Dr. (PARCEL C) � 2015
Generally, signage shouid be creative, unique, simple, and
discrete. Blade signs, banners and sandwich boards should not be
discouraged, but signs placed on the sidewalk should not obstruct
pedestrian traffic.
DESIGN RESPONSE:
Signage shall be designed per code and submitted for approval along with the
building permit.
H. Sidewalks
Sidewalks along arterials and retail streets should be at
least ten feet (10') in width. All sidewalks along arterials and
retail streets will be landscaped with palm trees, spaced to a
maximum of thirty-five feet (35') on centers, with "clear grey" of
not less than eight feet (8'). Acceptable palm trees include sabal
palms (sabal palmetto), medjool palms (phoenix dactylifera
`medjool'), and canary island date palms (phoenix canariensis).
Sidewalks along side streets will be landscaped with palms (clear
trunk of not less than eight feet (8')) or shade trees, spaced at
maximum intervals of thirty-five feet (35') on centers.
Portions of required sidewalks may be improved for nonpedestrian
purposes including outdoor dining and landscape material, provided that:
1. movement of pedestrians along the sidewalk is not
obstructed; and
2. on-pedestrian improvements and uses are located on the
street side of the sidewalk. Distinctive paving patterns should be used to
separate
permanent sidewalk cafe improvements from the pedestrian space on the
sidewalk. To enhance pedestrian safety and calm traffic, distinctive paving
should also be used to mark crosswalks.
DESIGN RESPONSE:
Sidewalks are minimally 7' wide. Landscaping shall be designed per code and
shall be submitted for approval at DRC application.
I. Street Furniture and Bicycle Racks
Street furniture, including benches and trash receptacles
should be liberally placed along the sidewalks, at intervals no
greater than thirty linear feet (30') of sidewalk. Bicycle racks
should also be provided, especially near popular destinations, to
promote transportation alternatives. Complicated bicycle rack
systems should be avoided. The placement of street furniture and
9
Coronado Dr. (PARCEL C) � 2015
bicycie racks should not interrupt pedestrian traffic on the
sidewalk.
DESIGN RESPONSE:
Street Benches and trash receptacles area proposed along Coronado Drive and
shall be designed per code and submitted for approval at building permit..
J. Street Lighting
Street lighting should respond to the pedestrian-oriented
nature of a tourist destination. In this context, it should balance
the functional with the attractive — providing adequate light to
vehicular traific, while simultaneously creating intimate spaces
along the sidewalks. Clearwater's historic lighting is an attractive,
single-globe fixture atop a cast-iron pole.
DESIGN RESPONSE:
Street lighting, it has not been decided if lighting is to be provided, if the
ownership determines that they wish to provide street lighting, it shall be
designed per code and submitted for approval at building permit.
K. Fountains
Fountains provide attractive focal points to public spaces
and add natural elements to urban environments. They should be
interesting, engaging and unique. While it is important not to
overburden architectural creativity regarding fountains, they
should meet at least the following standards in order to be a
functional and attractive component of the public space:
1. They should be supplemented with street furniture such as
benches and trash receptacles, and
2. They should have rims that are:
a. Tall enough to limit unsupervised access by small
children, and
b. Wide enough to permit seating.
Fountains should be encouraged in landscaped and
hardscaped courtyards and plazas.
DESIGN RESPONSE:
There are no fountains planned for the property, at this time.
10
�
Coronado Dr. (PARCEL C) � 2015
L. Materials and Colors
1. Facades
Finish materials and building colors will reflect Florida or
coastal vernacular themes. All awnings should contain at
least three (3) distinct colors. Bright colors will be limited
to trims and other accents. Glass curtain walls are prohibited.
DESIGN RESPONSE:
The design is primarily whife stucco with pale blue and blue-gray surfaces. All
colors are anticipated to follow the BbD color palate.
2. Sidewalks
Sidewalks will be constructed of:
a. Pavers;
b. Patterned, distressed, or special aggregate concrete; or
c. Other finished treatment that distinguishes the
sidewalks from typical suburban concrete sidewalks.
Materials should be chosen to minimize the cost and complexity
of maintenance.
DESIGN RESPONSE:
Proposed sidewalks will be designed using several coordinating paver styles as
well as concrete.
3. Street Furniture
Street furniture will be constructed of low-maintenance
materials, and will be in a color that is compatible with its
surroundings.
DESIGN RESPONSE:
Concrete street benches are being proposed along Coronado Drive. Designs
shall be coordinated with City staff.
4. Color Palette
A recommended palette for building colors is presented
on the following page.
DESIGN RESPONSE:
The building shall utilize the BbD color palates.
11
Address
401 Coronado
405 Coronado
495 Coronado - Bldg #1
495 Coronado - Btdg #2
415 Coronado - Bldg #3
419 Coronado/422 Hamden
406 Hamden
Name
Back Street
Gulf Beach Inn (Key Lime)
Gulf Seach Inn {Fa�on)
Gulf Seach Inn
Gulf Beach Inn
Gulf Beach Motel
Bay Lawn
Use
Motel
14lotel
Mabef
Motel
Motel
Motet
Motel
SF
2,463
2,398
5,852
1,368
2,802
7,535
6,588
# of Units
8
7
11 + office
4
6
17
14
No utilit�r bills available for the demolished buildings - buikfings comdemned when purohased
Yr Demolished
2010
Standing
Standng
Standing
Standing
zo�o
2Q10
2012 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ANNUAL REPORT FILED
D O C U M E N T# A09000000158 Secreta ry of State
Entity Name: MAINSTREAM PARTNERS VIII, LTD.
Current Principal Place of Business: New Principal Place of Business:
°k THE EASTON GROUP
10165 NW 19TH STREET
MIAMI, FL 33172
Current Mailing Address:
% THE EASTON GROUP
10165 NW 19TH STREET
MIAMI, FL 33172
FEI Number: 26�d407287 FEI Number Applied For ()
Name and Address of Current Registered Agent:
EASTON, EDWARD W
10165 NW 19TH STREET
MIAMI, FL 33172 US
New Mailing Address:
FEI Number Not Applicable () Certficate of Status Desirad ()
Name and Address of New Registered Agent:
The above named entity submits this statement for the purpose of changing its registered office or registered agent, or both,
in the State of Florida.
SIGNATURE:
Electronic Signature of Registered Agent Date
GENERAL PARTNER INFORMATION:
Document #:
Name: MAINSTREAM GP, LLC
Address: °k THE EASTON GROUP 10165 NW 19TH STREET
City-St-Zip: MIAMI, FL 33172
AQDRESS CHANGES ONLY:
Address:
City-St-Zip:
I hereby certify that the information indicated on this report is true and accurate and that my electronic signature shall have
the same legal effect as if made under oath; that I am a General Partner of the limited partnership or the receiver or trustee
empowered to execute this report as required by Chapter 620, Florida Statutes.
SIGNATURE: EASTON AND ASSOCIATES CO MGRM 04/25/2012
Electronic Signature of Signing General Partner Date
2012 LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY ANNUAL REPORT FILED
DOCUMENT# L05000086848 Secretary of State
Entity Name: MAINSTREAM GROUP, LLC
Current Principal Place of Business: New Principal Place of Business:
2552 22ND AVENUE NORTH
ST. PETERSBURG, FL 33713
Current Mailing Address:
2552 22ND AVENUE NORTH
ST. PETERSBURG, FL 33713
FEI Number: 20-3537334 FEI Number Applied For ()
Name and Address of Current Registered Agent:
RILEY, STEVEN P
4805 WEST LAUREL ST STE 230
TAMPA, FL 33607 US
New Mailing Address:
FEI Number Not Applicable () Certificate of Status Desired ( �
Name and Address of New Registered Agent:
The above named entity submits this statement for the purpose of changing its registered office or registered agent, or both,
in the State of Florida.
SIGNATURE:
Electronic Signature of Registered Agent
MANAGING MEMBERSIMANAGERS:
Title: MGRM
Name: FERNANDEZ, ANTONIO
Address: 2552 22ND AVENUE NORTH
City-St-Zip: ST. PETERSBURG, FL 33713
Date
I hereby certify that the information indicated on this report is true and accurate and that my electronic signature shall have
the same legal effect as if made under oath; that I am a managing member or manager of the limited liability company or the
receiver or trustee empowered to execute this report as required by Chapter 608, Florida Statues.
SIGNATURE: ANTONIO FERNANDEZ MGRM 03/12J2012
Electronic Signature of Signing Managing Member, Manager, or Authorized Representative / Date
DE$CRIPTION: (AS PppVIDED BY CLIOff)
PIfQIECT MEA - PAHCEL 'C'
PMC0. 6: LOT 1� COL{1BU SUBDMSION Ip. �� AOWNDINB TO 71� PLAT
Tf�lEOF AS REOOROED IN PLAT BOOK 27� NI� 60� OF TXE RIBLIC IIECOROB OF
PINELLA9 COIMY� RWtiM.
PMCB E: LOTS 11 AM 1P� COLUIBU ffi1BDIVISION N0. �� ACCORDINB TO TF�
PLAT 71EREOF AS REC0110� IM PLAT B001C E7� Po1� 60� OF Tif ry1BUC
RECCROB OF PIIIELLAB C01)fTY� fLd1IDA� AL60� BE6INNLNB AT T1�
Wf�BECRON OF TIE XIBH MI1791 WIIK OF TIE �1LF OF IE7QC0 AID TIE EASf
AND NEBT CBfiBI LIIE OF BECTiON E� 1�IIBNLP � 80UIH� RAd� 73 EASTp
AID RUI T!�lCE EABT ALONO 11E EI18T 111D �EBT CEKIDI LIIE OF 811ID
BECfION 8� 18�.9! FEET� TIfNf:E BdRN 1679.94 FEET� TIEMCE 801lIN
77'25'80' EAST. 2B0 FEET FOR A PoINT OF �INIINB: 7lENCE HOIITN
n•zs•ao• �sr, �o �er: niece sarrx �ra4�sa• �sr, so.sr r�r;
ni� rnxTx n•ss�so• r�sr, �o r�r; nierce Moxm �ru�so• �sr,
60.87 FEET TO A PoINT OF BEBIININO� OTIEMIIBE DE8CRI8� AB LAT 1-A OF
COLUBU &SDIVIBION N0. 5� ACC4DIN8 TO T!E PLAT TlEREOF A8 RECOF�ED
IN M.�T BOOK 91� N� 1!� OF TIE P11pLIC REWROB OF PINELLAB COUfTY�
FLOIIId1. •
PMCEi 7: LAT 2� WLUBU BUBOM8ION Ip. 4� ACCCpDINB TO 7HE PLAT
TlBIEOF AS RECOflDED A1 PU1T BOOK 27� PI1BE S0. OF T!E PUBLIC RECOIOB OF
PINELLAB COIMY� RORIM.
PMCK 8: L0T8 6 ND E� �U &SDMSION N0. 4. ACC�INB TO THE
PLAT TIEREOF A8 NECOIiOED IM PLAT BOpC 7l� PAOE 50. OF TVf PUBLIC
RECAXUS OF PINELLAS COUHfY� t10qIDA.
PNICa Y: LOTS 9 NO 4, COLI�BIA SI1BpMSIM1 N0. 4, ACCOROINB TO T!E
PIAT THER�F AB � IN PLAT BOOK 27� PA� 60� OF THE PUBLIC
RECOIIDS OF PINELLti9 COUIRY� FLOpIOA.
CONTAININO 1.92 ACNEB Y011E di LEBS.
HURVEYORS X�ORi / NOTE$
+) me oc auevEV: ea�+wRr. roroon�wac. urnm auavtv. uer wh oF � wowc osa,2wa
z) nas wrt�r ws sm+ vr��c w�n�a�rr n� ear�t oF w nnF va�cr. nE �onaanoN aHOwN n�or�
HAB B�! SWPLIED BY CLFM.
sl w�s oF a�wnaa nr norcr�ar rWwr oFwwr ur� oF srn aT�r aEU�o - rm� ov osw. Fao v�u�s.
s> ewe�9 oF ELEVA7�a+Q crtr oF aFJ1RNUtee m�cN hv�roe Fa4 �vwTwrr 4.oar ru�w taa0. rea nE crtr oP
CJ.FJIRWATER BF]IW MMK BOOK
� BUBJE4T PROP�f1E8 MAVElEEN AELD SIRVEY� B116m ON qBD MONUMENTATION. AND LOCJ.T10N6. THE
sOlMD/1RY MFOMMTON BHOVip 1£R6.ON li B�BFD ON 7/1E FIRID MqNUUFJl7AT10N.
!) UIriRY LOf`aT10Ne. ELEVA71GM0. ETG A REMON�lLE 6�DRflW B�! MI10E TO PI�VIDE LOC�T10N6 AtO
BEVA7qN6 OF 6IOR4 8EIMFRA/0 BMIRARYlEINBt KaNW7%714 HOMIEV62 TfE 6fRVCRNiEB 8110WN ON TNB
iUfNEYARE IRJLL OF WA79C MNONO T1E ACCURACY OF MEMlJR91BiTE pRIC{JLT TO OQTNN.
� R.00D ZONE MOTEB
11CCOf�IDKi TO T17E F�111L B�IOB�CY IMI'IAOE1.�Mf AOB�CY R.00D M78UR/1PICE RI�TE
NAP. COMMUMTY N0.1PdOYl. \Nr NO.tII707C070hi.1Mili AN L4FECI7IIE OATE OF 9'd09.1NE
elAiCf PROPERTY APPEM670lJE WfITNM 711E FOLLOYYNO FLOO� IDNES:
'AE'.1MV1110 A WF ROOD HEVATON OF 17.0 FffT ABOVF MEAN BbA IEKrL''AE'. W1NNO
A M8E FLOOD Hl1/ATqN OF 120 F@7ApWE hEAN BEA LEVa,1�r Ii1�VNp A MBE
FLO00 ELEVI�TIOM OF 1]A FEEf ABOVE MEAN BEI1 LEVEL AIO'VE' INVlq A B1�8E ROOD
ritvwnoN oF ua rgr �eove ��w aFw ��. wn»� w�w �aas. v�x wv.
DEEBMffT2 FORMMPOFBURVEY.
- v.u�a n.e
- r.ea ��dMy
� Traflk Uq�t Aqnal Pok
- �w>vte caue�ae wm�ea
- rie+...ia,a w�a surveyo.
� M�wurtE pvta
� Ni4�tl EiK $ectbn
a Nenlwls
� N�lW Llql�l PNe
� Natoi Pip�
= riotiwo seae
_ �,,,,
= owMaaa ��vm
- aFUO� k«ae Beek
� Pbt Beek
� PMWO� Can1Y F^T��9
- r� (e) t
� P�O�Y lin<
� RatlainW Wo1s
� ream_o/_roy
� sanMVy
- Secnm
� Stvm
� Set bn poE S/8' R Lw
(LB1686)
� $st Nall k Obc (LBl6B6)
= Sst RiMt k DMC (LB)696)
e i top o �A
� TW� Pb
_ �,_ �„
- rooa up�� rae
- wove vo... ca�
- wa. va..
� Viny Fwm
� Woatl Fsroe
� ln�st Floa Ekvetbn
� Eb�Nion
- s�,.r
� Pb:lk Pp p� �
- �d.mc. nro
� R�M�M �9�U0 �d Pipe
- wesa Hmo-a
= nomc canva s�d eo.
= u��
= co�„w
� Wals Yain
O.arlwnG �
r.o.s. oenores ro:xr oF er�x�irs
P.O.C. OOATES PoINT OF COI�FJMAIQlf
SEC710N 8, TOWNSHIP 29 SOU77-I, RANGE 15 EAST, PWELLAS CWNN, FLORIDA
MAP OF SURVEY:
��»��
CURYE P�pUS NiC fENCiH CHURD IFNGRI CHMiD BENWC
C9 507.00 �OB.`A b3.76 ND450Yt
CIO W7.00 121.59 12128 N29'W 58 P
C70 507.00 121.70' 121.47 N29'OY'XI
C13 507.00 90.00 !9b! N7P2516 P
C14 507.00' 89.77' E9bB' lbP15�18i P
C15 50].00' 80.00 59.9Y HOB1YMi P
C16 50].00' 851' 651' N7708'70i P
C17 50].00' 60.00' S9.97' Nf651'7�b P
��
Q�.
Q u.
OY��
� an
O ��
O�
pp��
O�CtY
T
TREE LEGEND-
- OAK (512E AS NOIED)
� PINE (SQE AS NOTED)
� EARiREE (SIZE AS NOIEDj
� MJ.MORE (9iE �S NOTED)
. NMLE (512E AS NO'IED)
� NAq10LIA (92E AS NO'IED)
� PALII (SItE AS NOIFD)
= uruuowr, (sa ,�s wo,m>
= NOLLY (9iE AS NOTED)
= PODOC�RPUS (9II �l5 NOIFD)
� CHINE� 7ALLOw (SIlE /5 NOT
SYMBOL LEGEND
� Cnpfe Televlslon y Guy Wlre Anchor
u Bnckflo. Preventer � Hydrant
• Bloroff 0 Irrigntion Lontrol Vntve
� CuYp INet 9 Metnl Llght Pole
■ Concrete Llpht Polr 8 Porer CoMrol Hoz
o [tennout � snnitnry Sewer Mnnnale
� Concrete Power Pole � Storn Sewer Mnnhole
Concrete Monunent � Electrlc Box
0 Mitred End Section T Slpn
9 �lood Llght m Tpipphone Control Hox
oa Gnte Vnlve e Gns Vnlve
@ Grnte Intet p 4' W¢tl Cnslnp
m Telephone Box � ya;�. ry�{er
Telephone SIOn .p, Vood pove� Pote
(x Plustic LIgNt Pole m Nn0.6ox
O Gunrdrnil/ROOf Pos{ ,_,,,_ ReduMed Mofer Line
-c- Gns Line -.- Wuter Line
-�- Telephone Llne -sa�� Scnitnry Se.er Line
-�- Cn61e TV Llne -rr- Storn Se•er Llne
-c- Electrlc Llne -+.'�- Chlll¢tl Vnter Llne
SEE &fEi Y FOq WP OF BUpVEY.
� o N I G
i c
�
�
� � �
h�p �
n
Q N
v �
Z �
� �
� �r N
� � Ur z
�� m
Q�n¢
� � w
Iw ��r°a
V 3� �
W
M � ZZ Z
�� O Q
m �Qa�
Q �
�� o
�
U
� � O
b
� � w
a
�
�
� O
J
`
f �
a �
v �
� �
� �
� �
� _
V �
�
�- SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE °1
I hereEy certl/y that this Survey roe meEe un0er my nsponable chorge arW �
xta t�s Mlnim�m T�chnkol Stmdartla a� aN lorM �y the FlpiEO BoarA of �i
Profeeabnd Lond Survryore in Chapter SJ-1], Flwido Adminletrative coea 6
pura�ant lo Sectwn t74.02], Floritlo Stolutec.
Suney moD a�d report w the topks lharof ore not valtd wNhout the �
e'gnature anE the oriqinol nieeE eeel of o FloriEO licenxtl eurve�ar an0 mappx. U
> i
m m
�/F �� =` 04/t�/'101♦ I Z
^'�L� �� 9aY D. Wnite (Dole n d N <
/,. �: p ofeeeiaM Land Surveyor �' 4166 Q�' z
Stote o( FWWO O O
p� J�p�E �- .;,k9�Q\ 4 __ \ � �� r � o
TREE LEGEN �\ � � ,g,o�o' a � .,��• ,,. s y � �o * � ` �erxa � oer�a r� e s
C] �s
O� ° MK (92E AS NOIEDi � .1:- P� � / fl � .�� \ y�� (L*m � � � �
V � � ♦ PDIMf OF CG�If�lf �
0�� : Pf1E I512E il5 NOIEDJ Q`` 1eP �� y�° '°" : / . , �,,. �� � 4 '" \ ���,� .e 4 ` �7 �.9A � ar xiw 4r g •
fi � e GXtRFE (9iE �l5 NOIFD) '�'�� � �" � � 'r .-�'��'S�'}o �' ,�, � ., � A,t9c ,�'�'iy \\ 4r� � '?. a�eo,tis "�%� n - 1/� aMr �ao�o w�o ia � � ��� � � �
` �'° c `o
�� � SYGAHptE (SIIE AS NOIED) � �el . �� �'i o m � oo ca . ♦ �� � � '0� 4ti � i wr-�esr m�euwe .ir. � � o ��-.
r3. tY 1� 1 O % � � lL o�`. �D 1 6 LECfI01 {-4l-16 � v�
3 0 � ; o
J Q � N�PIE i92E AS NO7ED) `\ r -O� +a � � � / y, � �'C .. 9°4r ,� '' C•Y�L '��k �` ° a � �s
�� � M�A1QJ� (SZE AS NO1ED) �O� a�. OQ / ,,✓"° �► � b'.�, 1y �e s�e � �� �" �
� / � °u
� � vw� (sa as aoht) GQ bd \P �*�,, ° �' '„ � `': �°'y ,y Z �a
QN. � UNKNMW �92E �5 NOIE�) O� q-�s /����� t� i� / '° �p• �t,a oa� '-��'`r y � m
lE � ,�, -
Q � MOLLT (SIZE AS N01ED) O � °�o �� �' A °'�� l g� G
G � � �� ; �'" �. . . s.�^ ., �s ., � � U
��,v�rs - raoocamus �sze tis nmeo) �� � ,k. � O .. e � , \� � �(� c � K�
q. - CMNESE TALLMY i93 AS NOTFD) � ,� � W�� s- q. 'L 7 � i ,o � q, a` ��� c
,, ' 4 (� f � # »- �r° �` � " m t� � �„ '��, +•ey � � � � � � s
� # °6 � � 9S� ��; ` � 'r?(� Am ��s � $ j � s
�. i °'�� �D g��W
� / ''��� $�. � �. '� 1� J � \ �O c� g � :
O i / �'� .y ' +. `sr �` � � T� % �O � � mu� oF �ar i
F'f ta. ,�'�,� 9a eaurt� e�mssow ro. s
tiF � i' '• y/ Ay1 `,y u�� s ",�rzp� _ co %��i \ s �pT " nwr �m�c n, ►�oE w o 2o ao 60 ^
y f i , , ��• . � 4,s � � 'ac� � f� 005�
r �
y� �� .. ��� O �O. 'S�'yyL f� • ,�_ � 0.� Gsjr�j•'41y\ � 0 8 o c
F •�• � ; � /, �'� t� �
J � ? 3. >A �'a\ �.
`'j a, /�� i3 � � � s;� �� �'�� " r� � � ��"b \� 1� fF.� � oamcs rcm m+ui. „ `z
s� " �L, ��. t�q,"��r
f� � d ..� `I� �\ u o <pT Y s �- ' �+a`�e ' 4a� ��� \£ � ,yh��'qs�? k� cuz.� waus Nec �cr+cm anRO i[HCrH capn eEwwc N e� `e
6 Go 3 � �� p �'� ,p�;� ce so�.m jm.so' x1.�s' norso•�a1v �
� �S . . \ 4\�y' i. p C10 SO7.OU' 121.SB 1212B' pX09'S9iY P
j � r ' ��� 5� s s', !. �`�i� 'p''� s�' ,1.n � cia sm.00 ixi.�o isi.si• raan9'm �
� / l � �2 4. `s ? i��„ u p��` C1J 507.00' 90.00' 89.88' N1P25'16 P �� �
j ��� /�: • / '!�. !'r � u % n � � ,� [�0 2i3Jp, 'i,� J ��/�� .���R''�o O'bf ie�•.. �o� �'L' n4 w�.ao as.n ae.ee nmisie P a �
as �' l�•n• ,RIM ^ � Y.3�� ` � �yJ a')' �yA V> >. C15 'A7.00 60.00 59 NOS153/ P h
_� :,'�'�„ �i ,'Y, '.\f'+ JO .. 5 S.. '3' 7� �G ,/y J- �6 '`� `�� \� 9 J � u S,1 3,�0 C77 507.00 fi0.00 599 N1CSf 23� P ■ p �
i 4� �
.yysD�� e Y � .� i � y�s ° r 'H+4no,,,� r1 ., dyq�.oJ Y '�q+sS��+e. \�S�y..o 5 Z o �
v � �^
'``<,y. y� � '�,.�' �\ �qp , s;t ,s _ . Scc [� �J `�'t'ry.s. � : � �
b W 6. � .� r� ,y r Ja'� e -O �? Y �i%i
a � �.t. jl. ). o , n
% i� e ., �!� °«, J Ja '$ � `� � i °' z
� / *6' ... � Y / iS�' '0� � � � ��i ' V I
� � '�' mb * \ � +ba0 �1'�.. �'�,( �"� � � �MO���th�y J '4�.�A�'G'�,��, � � � n �
e ; � �+,b. y ,�,z� ' `�. '�'"a�C�,p, � %* �;;,�,T^�4- i
a. 0 � f Ql � C. �s � 4 Rt,.'Zr� � +b- r.� � a�^,� a
j ' ,,, � 0 �+ � • �� to`4s �p` �t ys �'s. .. t\�7O" 'y / :„ � 3 r s
� � �f � � ` :,, �,� �fl <. � ��,.v �?� �. �� �°' \e, ' � � <
;� bp� 2 r� � O
� �� � a �
/ '� / }y '�'�S�b, ,S��qpy 1,�'S�''� � `'�- <OT •• � '��b + �\�� c � � o
�/ �
,� j� �� " �1 a sP� / +. 5►���$� co ���\ se� J! ,1ocPel t� !�� p3oEr seta�r�rorti�a.��c�no�aw�voae�arr�mever.flc m a �n
/' � `a�d° A �� 4 , � ��.,ey �y��` \ � Y u �'�� ��`,��L�I . y N•�ot�� LEGEND � � � <
�. �/ y. �e .y. '0e �y (�` o r y,, ��J +/- � PWS p MMUe (mo.e o. w.) v/c - vwm aro a
� 7 / u SG Vl � j. i� AL � Awe� M/L . Yelal LanNn9 U
w/�,(� t� •.Q..�J BOT � Bokan e1 Boz 1L� � Tmffc 4gM Siqnol Pda Q
'� / �7� �Oy �` �C � � / iy \~O�,<� ��e4�'s �'� �� � / L � `b � � e BLD4 - Bu�Mq v�ewrkx l5 - Fo�/wlaM Lwq�Sn.a� , b O
� 1 /� ,*, J � lP � �1., � 1 M� ` i� � ��a ,ory o � J $ � � �� u ' eA � ��� res . c�� � ai� s�R (im - uw.a. oao � W
/ f . s y, '� O �o �, o~ j � �� �bi� d' Qis-` � `eue - eart�%ac � a R�.a wn a u.w �qnc Pw.� � n
� +,�� @ '� �1 i � °. P � 6' � �° l� .�, � c/c - rA.�e c�Qa� NP : Y�td Vpe
`° '° �S aw �Y '� F � t u �� � y � D�' nf � ad� u+ f.r�v N/c � No c�
j�� �/ �( q�, ia, � �@ � - � J yl �2�' �, . GP � CSY � Cmrnl� SMwdk N15 � Not To ScW
u �.� j�. � �v. , o q � .d� tln O� `j1 �E � `Q .�, � �n O CONC . Conml� 0/A = Owdl
i� J / e! �<'. � `�, ��{, S�1 : yv�., S,`C'S°ij `'9 ���" � '� 9�g +b�y, '0$ (ooe) - oab v.. o� buo� o�a � o n�i R.�.a eow
y ° '� or �or .t �.. .�2 .,, ` '° "ty'�qs � o/�' = wo«a+.e.oBY°k rao � be.°ac`o„Mr c�qMe.�
�� � �{} 4 � Ql `1 'l•c B T'� \ J Je�i � S �� `6 ��j +,'��� ~�� EOP � EM of PM P6.<e � PWe (s)
.� '� ( \� f Qi V� , �, '�c,� � E/P FA9a oi Pa.nrsit DapaVnsil
� �5 ab c � ���;� � h,r,\1 l 9.j1 1 �` u `°`_+a,�'�nn.° r�c � r.M. ca„�« vA� - nw.cr �w,.
• f � m Se e,�y,0� ,� �5, �O. f�3� s6 +y / � �o Q4 h' `�' • '>� t�� rw =a�(� �enssj u�� PM' . PMM ow� .r
�� o- 4 � at+ i` •Y� y� AA'+�.� �,�e ^ / ..� �' qY` �.. W� �. Hei.a sm. - swm�
/ �' � \ �a°' ae., '" qy: � ''A4't�,,'+1, � �S ..,. / � � �` .S�ti° s.�ss.�+. nR � r� � Raa a �w s/e• gi� : �"�°`� �
+y'Q,y y s� ��°�e S�'i ^d co `I�''' �l (�enss) u�M.. no�a SR . St Man Ro! SIC k Gap
e� So� p'S t' •. u �P� �, � �,�4� y qy �^'" rw - rw,�a �t8)6D6)
�''°''t• S Q/ , ,•� ° °� -Y g` e4s ��5�� °o�.°>. M� (UM�° NeAtaE)OYC (�tl LB�bi6) �. s�.i wM k �ic((IB' 698) J
t �Q
Y'- 4 ,� aA 'Oe L *6�'F"�.-�. rar - Ka.�a 4m Pa� sM . sb..ak W .
/ �� *-IM �" o� s,� R� `0�« ��/ wa - ra.�a rx��n.e rp� me _ Tw er ee� V �'
P .. ��` '� s `g � `.�. I1�" / �.o� . ' �.�.�� � o�� " 'h`% �` �y `y a - am: r�..eoon u%c � u�'°i`a.od.�a � f
'�, ,�, 3 6 >� sj„ o> <o `J° � �o `� ° q' � a - aai. mi.t iov = Tan or PM J
-� 2 �' P �f 2� ' h r - r.�.pw�. rw = wei. u�s d
,t p�r. �? W e E, . d' ,o -a '4 'f;,' .n c a �
;.b_ 9y o� ��N ao ° =i `'.r. '� 0►`° `Ai a � cv _ wa va» ws .�ooa u�t rw �
G a-� t a OCV� � OouW Owck W�e N�snDly WPP = Wood Pawr Pola �
.y >�`� \ �f^f^ � �F�\ �1�� `T' �. �, P 4 M/1y � Nwdrnll W/V . Nalr Valw
�� �.-'. .y � YtCV � Myotbn Cen4d Vqw Bm V/F = Mnyl Fsws
u �.. � " �\ �y yo ��el y� � �q 4 o u/r . w� a v�n`�' ws � �i� �. �.aa a q
D '� \ � / � �4v �Y 'ry �O Q� EOP � EM ot PM EL Ele�atbn =' �
� 't' '�. ,b ` '� $ 'o' '°�-� E �' : a i� R.Mwo.e c�a. � : we�� ai� ro< v
Ss9,5 • �'6°' ,� ''�� JJ 'e,� � �.,, ��P� J reu � nmeo�o.r e.�a.�an L/� �awx�e w� �
m•
7 9 ����q, (p) - o.io n.. wat EtlIP � d"ptktl Lem�qateE M�ta Vp
S o-J9 �25j W `�� u• \�a�� a aA ` \\ R^r;?Zr� �sT - �me.vao• T�nDr aa - n.Mbre.e emv.�. Pb� m
�i' � IS. ' . Z� d � � ih TVC� . RCaMe TalaN bn 1R � TrvH �Cmt�rol S4�^I Bm � `
t�" �9.��. /P� � �, .. t� � �6 wM - w�w u.�s uac. - ws .� �
q� �PI y �' �'l, , �2 • � d° . d` P�O. _ P°e�.�� t :v - �°wei ux�
`h �� d4 � �C � ,p�e� .t .e / e�wr - aW�we.r oM - o..b,a t �
e+"
7 p 4
�i y'�i. fe ��� 1 �
.. '�� � ? � / � ,S � / \ �� ....,...,.� � �..�.�..
�. !q,
�a�, ��. � � � .�°� P,� �`°�y�.°�S�
rTJ r �Q ��.
.{�D '� 4.. sr �.,° Q
� +
~�''��' �W � �Pl s, •. �� /�\�\' s°' �l�
o� � J. � S• M p0
�oFa � r� ` �r° � l,�' �� � �� s /
. ao ei�' bp� ,�\ Q � r,h.J�f- d 4},� Q
�OO� �.� � 4� v� u ,`O\ 0�., e s. C�`
* �.y1,��j,3� • ` ^\V �� �� 9
/ 0r , ��S �\1` O `��yQl �
� . O� � . A � O
R� � P
1�
`�� JY a Vs �; �\C%''t '�1
60
17. J'�'d'" �� \
9
� g / �, �L�' C�
P.O.C. DB107E8 POINT OF BEBIININ9 � �
P.O.C. DBIOTES PoINT OF CqMf710EYEIR
�
� �
SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE a �
I Mrebr eertl/y Not t�i� Suney �wo maEe unCer my rospmede c�arqe onE
Pt¢ Me Yinimum Tedw�ital Stmaade oe set /arN �y Me FlaiEa BoarA o/ � J
.etes:�d �e s,�yo.a In Uaptd SJ-17, flwlEa AdmMisbatha Cede, d V
punuant to Secl'wn {7YAI7. Floritlo Statutes
5urver mop anE nport w t�e eo0�ea Msroof ore not valk wimwt Me 3 3 3
e'gnatun onA tha oriqmai m xE eeal of a FleriEe licmeetl aurve�v enE meppe�. � V V
m m m
/' ,� �-�` Ox/21/lO1� I ; �
.�'r '{''�1"���� oaao.Y�. wnne (ooi. s9�.al �� s m
�, P r o.� a �o�a s�,�yo� � awe o 0
� . s<ai� or rwua
_.. � � �° �"s / HEE iye-. OF�
'I I
PAVER PLAZA
10'SIDEWALK
�
—tANDSCAPEAREA
HAMDEN DRIVE SITE PLAN NORTN
� scn�e a = _o V
10'SIDEWALK
avFt� P
W
�
F--
�
2
in
GREEN SCREEN �� LANDSCAPE AREA
LEVEL 3 GARAGE
N
U
4.�
� �
� C�
CL� �
4.�
��
� �i�/ �
� �
A425e101"(;d
� C�EARWqTEP
' �03 Ro�ers S t.331'aE
�i t.]2]4i83013'�.1�92i97890]8
, This tlrawkng s ihe arcGerry ot
�� behar . pete�anecz,inc. antl
mey not ba used nr reproducnd
w:Iho�! v:ritten p�trmiss��.an tro�n -
Ce�a� � pe:¢ran¢c>. ��n.,
tSTVAN L.PETERANECZ
AR94533
FLORIDA
I PROJECT TITLE�
I
L
� �
W
� J
L.L
�U
j � �
J w
Z W �
', Q � Q
W
� � U
ISSUED DRAWING LOG'.
QoA
+Q�e
'Q s _
�
�
0
�
�
�
�
0
PROJECT NO�. �
MAI14.03
ORAWING TITLE
SITE PLAN
IISSUE DATE�.
NOTE: PLEASE SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS , 2015.04.30
FOR EXACT SITE AND ROADWAY ����
SHEET
INFORMATION
A1 0
-
CDB APPLICATION
I
!I
I
I
' I
�yT�O�P OF STAIR TOWER
EL.=+itY 4'-0" ___
�MAIN ROOF � __ �'
EL=+1' 102'-0" `
LEVEL NINE
L=+�—___
�'E B7 �•'
,tiLEVEL EIGHT �
'PE�= +Sb'-0" —
hLEVEL SEVEN '
EL = «6�. -_rt_.
�LEVEL SIX�� � `
L.=+58'YE -8"
�LEVELFIVE ��'��
�'EL=+4b'-0" -�—'
C
�LEVEL FOUR
L_a�,�'E -0" _._.
tiLEVEL THREE
E�L--. 4'� '
�. LEVEI TVJO
�_atYE 4'-0" -
hBASE FLOOD G
S 12'-0" NAVD
�LEVEIONE _ y�_
1'EL.= �0'-0"
GREEN XREEN OVE0.
GARAGE PA�iKING- �
,�TOP OF STAIR TOWER �
YEL.=. . '�" _. ___'.—' _ _ — - - —
114'_0"
J ` '.. ... p �
MAIN ROOF - -� �--�
�=.�E� � '+ -. __._...___ - _' . - - ��._
� ���� � __
�LEVEL NINE -�
E�_{91'�" . '�- - - - - � ._.._
iLEVELEIGHT . _ N�_ _ _ _ _ �__� �_��` �__
' EL.= i8� m � - � —
.'
iLEVEL SEVEN �__ �_ _�.
G
' EL.=+6g��-0" .`�- - - - - . �- .._
C° GLASSCJ+IUNG � � . . ;.
�' S1'SfEM - .- � - [
�LEVEL SIX _x _ __ _....� — � ___P L_,�_ �._—
VEL.=i58'8" . . m
�, r
,� ' � �- - �F � - ,
iILEVELFNE mx- _-____-- ._. ._. _"_ '_ - �__..F,.w � '.. a . .
EL.=.4� ` __.._ .. _.r..
_._
� �
r GAfJ+GEG�GENINGS
� FRCTECTED BY �
BARRiEFWALL ���� -- ���
�
�LEVEL FOUR _� _
E�' _
� � I I� �� I II
, ,a
1LEVEL THREE . `� _ . _. _ __ ! _ �
�_ +2d' '13'— -
GRE-FlNISHED �� r �'1 �.f`T"
ALUMINUM
� BAHAMA SHUTTERS---- �� -
,tiLEVELTVYO _ r_x _ _ _
V€�b' - - ' �i I. (B :
-IBASEFLOOD
G
i
� �2._O..NA D � I
K �
; , -- -- �--�.� I , �
,� �� ;�
,ILEVEL ONE � `� '� � �
� __� !
EL=+� ta ti _ ____— .. __-__— --
EX!T
� FFE-FINISHED
ALVMINUM
6rHAMA SH VTTERS
., SOVTH ELEVATION
S�IhLE 1/i6 =+ L"
. __- __ . _' . _ _.______'
. � ._ - — .— _ _ _
r .��
I ... f __. . . _. _
__ , i
�i �.rv�_ _ � �,�. _,-� _ _-_ - - - -
� r ._
� , "�
'� �
a� �. � -
������������� i�` ��. ! —��
� -
�'�_�''� I �- , �. �
����__� , ������ � 1 , � 1 7; _ � � - --- � ___
_ -1-1 � - --� - �. - -�-.. - - - --
� . � � ��� � '�'�� ' J i � - � � '
7� ' {_, i� � i 1 . ..,. , � i
� " _ � ...i >� . � .. �s� ._-_ __ .. ___ _ ". " . _ .. _ . _
�...,..,, ^
��i �
1& a� t�� ��p � � _ �.- � � � � 5 sfEM iLiNG
. � -. � __ i : . �: _
. Y
� ... �_ -- �� � — I , � _. � —__ �� i _ _ _
�
�1�� . - - �
l- _ �
_ !��L �E�. ��1� w. L . __'� 1 ...__... ,_��_S.� � __ _._..�_.._._ '.� .. � — —
�� � � � �, �_ � ,- � , �,.,�..�..� � ��_
�. �� ' �� � , �� I �
ACK 'F
�f �� � �- I� � _� e �, � t_ �`� .�,� �
— - �- � t
, : � � , ;� —, �i 1_ E ��'1 � 1 . '���d�—_-- — �W_. _ _
a��
L -. . . , ! cvsscnNevv
� . . ._. _� _n_ i-�--._____ . .. �. . '.. ..___.___ � �. . _ _. ___-_.
� -.. . .... . .
d � � ^i F �,, ', -�- —_
� '. i n �—
` ... _:_.... _....... _ -___ _ —
— PRE-FINiSHED
� 1 � � - t �� ; ALUMINUM
3 i� y `- - �� BAHAA1ASHVT7ER5
�; � �� I� ! �; �- � --�- � �-- � " ' i , -- �i-; _ _
. � � . ... . 3� .—' -1.� - -
� NORTH ELEVATION
k1+lE� 1/16" _ '-C'
N
U
4�
�
�7 �
� �
�
� �A \
� Y
� �
AA26J613G6
GLEARWATEfl
t03 Ragars S:+ee;, 3^v/�6
t'2I4�83013'.' ]2?qJB:sG�4
Tt!is tlrew:ng :s tne F!r.per!y of
nehzr . peferanecz, 'mc. ar.d
not ba useC �r !ap!oduce�
er.ine� qe� _ n lro�r.
ISTVAN L.PETERANECZ
AR94533
FLORIDA
. d s'e �e.°,:;r,�':n:
IPROJEOTTRLE
I`
I �
W
I � J
i �v �
�
I z U �
� � �
Q
W
� a. U
ISSUED DRAWING LOG.
Qo�rE
p,ap,.
Q eiz�s
0
0
0
0
0
P�ROJECT NO�.
MAI14.03
DRAWING TITLE � � � �
EXTERIOR
' ELEVATIONS
ISSUE DATE.
2015.04.30
�;:::.���
SHEET
A5 1
� CDB APP'_ICATiON �
,�TOP OF STAIR TOWER
L.= a11��—___, �
Gi
MAIN+RS'EL 102'-0" . _ �f�
�
�LEVEL NiNE� _`�
-a9YEL 1'�" _ _'
�LEVEL EI�GHT
L.=+YE 80'-0" .__ ��. �`_
G,
�LEVEL SEVEN �`�
YEL.=+69'�" . __ i
U
LEVEL SIX _��
� _
GI G
LEVEL FNE G
`1-
G
�LEVEL FOUR �.
L=+�'E 34'-0" . ..
�LEVEL THREE '
L= «2� —`�
�LEVELTWO �_',�
L=+11'E 4'-0" -.--'.
�BASEFLOOD '' �"
, 12 .V��—
���
�LEVEL ONE
��.�-�� k
�� � D0.E-RNiSHED
GREEN SCREEN OVEk Fdyae: P,Y2d: �y,i'�5 Sf ALVMINUM
GAfiAGE GARKING � - - - � 6AHAMA SHUTTEF$
Openings 4`' Decorations, 11,9�0 SP SOVTH ELEVATION
60.0 a un�e +ns.-,.a•
tiTOP OF STAIR TOWER
L.=ai�� _._ _
hMAINROOF ,� .
YL=��
,tiLEVEI NINE ��
'PEL.=.�1-8" -
�LEVEL EIGHT � '
'VEC +$-G'-G' .
LEVE+� •
�
�eve��--�� _ ' `
L=f .
�LEVELFIVE r'��
L.=�41'E 8'-0" . .".
I G
�►LEVEL FOUR
�7� _
�LEVEL THREE '
�'EL.=�24'-0" - . J
�LEVELTWO '
L=+�'E 14'-0" __- -
BASE F�
-�
�LEVEL ONE yy
�'EL =+0'-0"
EYIT
Facacje. Area: 19,770 sf
NORTH ELEVATION Opeqingz 6t Decordtions, 1�,�90 SF
� scn�c.,ne�=,�.o� 62?%
r EXTERIOR �
i ELEVATIONS 'I
� FACADE �
i ARTICULATION
iPERCENTAGES
/
�
� �
� �
� �
?n:. ,',:'t�v:�:r�.�. :> �F...� ��.,:i;=:r:y :+
r
v��eft . .. .i.
iSTVAN L PETERANECZ
AR94533
FLORIDA
PROJECT TITLE-
`
�
W
�i
1
v, J
Z v
� �
` L�i
J
l.L
�
w
Q
�
Q
W
J
U
ISSUED DRAWING LOG:
+QDax _ s
�a --
0
�
�
�
�
�
�
0 _.
PROJECT NO�.
MAI14.03
DRAWING TITLE'
EXTERIOR
ELEVATIONS
ISSUE DATE'.
2015.04.30
SHEET'.
A5 1 b
CDB APPLICATION
� i':
� ��. i � ��
.�: i =�
�� ��� ��:�
�� � a�_ � � �; I � �� _ ,�
���t��$� 3�i�t° Y�"�II�l1i�i�llil�i�e�`^� q.,2���� p�� �I � a
�� .P �d� � � l���� pfl%.'�'�' '-0d' S.. . FA�
�n'" i: gR:_ i 4 i. I �,R `1 ' -^.
�f� G � i x
��, ' �,� � � �� �� �� !� �� � � � � � i� , � �".
�� ,� � �� � ( _ �,.
� I :;
� ' .�I �; ili R!(� �` <,. ( � �,t � ' b ( � .��£�v,`
.�� ,. ; �`i11'f'',.:��� i�!�� �IS�I��i I#T,��, i�l#�,.-�``v,�r"d'1��
�
�.. ..
s
, �
�F'
��
�
L.�
§;,
>g; �' �:.
�;�' , ?. . !�1
� z+�'�>�' _, p. °�'� ��
i ��
I
, I ''a
�
� '�`. I �`d
°� � W � � �
. �;.:�,_ � ��_�, '�:��
y �� �� :�m �, � r
,�g �
yp� � �� A �'I� � � ` ., 3I !
1 $ , ! � .; i i:
� !- � � � � J1�:
1 .; y
P !
�; ;F I, � �� . � � � � ,,
, , �
�� �� � �� . � � � _� �
,: §�
� ��e;i ,�.,� . ;��:�t�' �j ',
',
I
.. „ � Y+� X . � "_ } �y:4�P�
: ' � t ��
"� " �e1r`r:c.
+r. . t
:�:,.� -,. a�,in .
._ _x � • :�
.. �....� _ _ �,}��� �
` �i�' H�M1'vF,' � .. .
_ ' �R/11 _
� r �,
b - ,x
�� t# ��
����,�., ,_ � ���. W � � .��
� �-
� ,� r ��= ' , "�. w .�; � �,�: =�,r �„ � �
�'� {� � � -; , �� � - � �- �,
�,'� �Y'!9'T��4A #}��j`� � .�ry..� < W4�'��r„ �...
F' 3 S
�ry. �. Yi � �-�#R,�y.i �-: .�.� ■ s
f��a,�, f� �at �,`i�}- �t '�. ("' i't" :-.r." aa �s+�- jw-... �,
'- � � _ ■ a :..
�� � � t �� +��. 1l ya �+ "'s# �n •'{r-: , �
y-. � � ��3'�� �...:.� W� � '�%� r� � �' t�^�..
Y� �
� +a.< .-�y'_z .ff--.�X'r`.*j ..: , t .
��. = a,
.� � ; � 4. � . - �- � k � ,�, _ --
� ��, � .. ,; 9 %� �.
,� r � "�;` � _ �—
� �
� s_ . - � " --
� °• - �,� ° rtitEZ `
. w o. ., ,tr�y °�
x_ _' � - _` _' -- �����.
_ .`: _ .-' _"
NOR.TH EASTPERSPECTNE
.y�u�� ��,`� �
_ � � � � � � � �' "�' � �.,
`��'�.�� � { � . � � �,. `�: :„.�� � •�
� �� =� . � "`�' x: ,
b
s �- � � �
.,� � � � � ' �j _ z �.�.` r..�.r�
� �
. � r`„ � � ��"�?�
s �
E
�k �� � �� ���r '' _� �f�tk���
. �.� � �.._`i �r'`,�`�
� ,.�����' .... .• . _�� .� . , i� ��
_-�- ���� ,,. � �
_ ��
.
� . . ,, � �
„� .. Srtis ,�'► ; ,�.:A ? � �'�':1
�Rf.f-r . i- " r' ^t '.-�-}�._-
,
.r _.. —_�—=" �. � � _ , : � �:
A�
Hnnanen okive
� r- _ ���_ ._.. � -- _
H - _ - __
. ��<�— —
AERIAL �I ��
— � � ;..�— • "z u ;
f3 �r.0 � �' 1x � r' :'t �i � R • � �"�x � ,p '' �l ,� � `�' i? ii, r.
t
�i"i . 6 r� #, � '
te `r .rti r-" 'x i �+i '� `�`�', �' ':�S
'" `� �"+.E �;�*-'-t +.�..."�' ,z _ r ����'"".� �p� . y,.
� ,
�
s �, � � � � � z� N �� ',� f���;. '`' ;�1 a,
� . , ��.� � � �+ r, �,r �s
�- � _, ._ _:.f , µ-,� +t. , ., �{-,�%J� �' .
sevn+ Ensr vE�scE. nvE
NORTH WE57PERSPECTIVE
\�
�
C/
,�
� 4. P � � k ;��t � .� .�.. �, �
,� ��
i,� .� y ,s .�. � a
t � l � ��,;� A w4 �� �f5 � _
+'" �,ty, � � ''�*,. ,A� _»
+-.� 7" g ' : :. �_.
� �� �� *�� I � ��t � � � .�,._
� _.. "�;,'���„,� -? ,�,� ��
1 F � � � ^� �` �€ �
� �
�-- �� .
,; ,� };� � � � .�'- } �� � ����� ,
� i�
+. :. f . s �y, � � � � ., ,� }, �+��
,
� �� �j � . �. a� ��.�i �.� � ,�{, .,�.tC
� � ��''�„i„ !'x- �. ��'�' � `1��e I
� � �� a�5`�� � � f � �
� , 1`� ' . , $�� �%'
... COkpN� �'�. ;� ,anE,
��RI��- " ---i ��"�`�� �
- :,�.-"�` �.,
`�--��
S011rH WESrPEF,sPECrivE
� �y�
- �?
�-
�
� ����➢
�� � • s.'o" ; �� �.f4W
f�: � �� r � .�� „
.�,;� r .,, "` . � �'°
� ,�,or'��t „
JC��
_ � ��� .
N
V
Q1
�
� �
� �
�
��
� �qI
� �
CLEARWATER
t03 Rogers S;ree: 33�SE
t. ,-2] 4]8 3CTC '.'21 e'8 9�)4
Th� fl g iF p p rt�y oi
o � ,a
-� t be tl . p C�ce�
' h tf p . ftom
C„rar a pe e ane,.z. �nc.
ISTVANL.PET
AR945
FLORI(
�� .;5£,d✓_. d�'e
PROJECT TITLE�
`
�
W
�
1
v, J
Z v
Q Q
� �
ERANECZ
f3
�q
J
L.L
�
W
�
�
�
Q
w
J
U
ISSUED DRAWING LOG'.
Qo�,E
Q>ap,.
Q e,z,s
�
�
�
0
0
�
PROJECTNO�
MAI 14.03
DRAWING TITLE�
PERSPECTIVES
ISSUE DATE�.
2015.04.30
I SHEET
� A5 3
_
CDB APPI.!CATION
I
i
�o
' ,- -"
95 2'
SOUTH V`
35' 1"
-_ 81 �
6", -
i4'
SOUTH EASTCORNER
z-�
� ;
� ;
I �
�o
i �
i ;
�,� ioo, ��.
I �
� �
I I
!
w
• ;
! !
� �
Ci£ARWATER
iE
.�-e g 1 , .�,- F3C;.3
,� ...� -. .:rty ol
zQ
t.,... ...,.
ISNAN L PETERANECZ
AR94533
FLORIDA
`
�
W
�
1
C1)
Z
Q
�
U
J
U
Q^
I..L
J
�
�
w
H
�
�
Q
W
J
U
ISSUED DRAWING LOG'.
Qo�
Q�e
Qa
�
0
0
0
�
�
�
0
0
PROJECT NO�.
MAI14.03
DRAWINGTI7LE- �
MASSING
STUDIES
ISSUE DATE�.
2015.04.30
A5 4
CDB APPLICATION
i
s
� i
i �
i •
.^,l_FAAFYATEP
� �t.t�.er;: c ;5F
. �: c _.,. s N' d' �'g,�-�
ISTVANL.PETERANECZ
AR94533
FLORIDA
TITLE
`
�
W
�
1
C%)
Z
Q
�
U
J
U
Q^
I..L
ISSUED DRAWING
0°^ _
+Q �e
Q e _
� —
�
� —
0
�
� _
J
LL
�
W
H
�
�
W
J
U
PROJECTNO:
MAI14.03
DRAWING TITLE'.
LEVEL ONE
ISSUE DATE� �-
2015.04.30
A2 1
�
♦
� �
1' 1
� �
�I..EARWATEP
'tiJ Rvqe�d 5��°et. 3's.b6
. . :CP�::;, c
h
ISTVAN L. PETE
AR945;
FLORIC
�
PROJECT TITLE:
`
�
W
�
�
�/ / J
Z v
Q �
�a
RANECZ
3
A
�
J
LL
Q'
W
H
�
�
Q
W
J
U
ISSUED DRAWING LOG:
Qo^
Q re
+Qs
�
�
�
�
�
g
0
0
PROJECT NO�.
MAI14.03
DRAW ING TITLE�.
LEVEL TWO
ISSUE DA7E:
2015.04.30
SHEET:
A2 2
CDB APPLICATION
i
♦
� �
! {
� i
CIEAP,WATER
St
�. .c- F3:�id
.s tl*;i _ - �!y ;;
yc,.at
ISTVAN L. PETERANECZ
AR94533
FLORIDA
f�
�
W
�
�
�/ /
Z
Q
�
�
�
�
.,
�
J
�
�
W
H
�
�
Q
w
J
U
ISSUED DRAWING LOG:
�o.
Q�a
�e
�
�
�
�
�
�
0
0
�
PROJECTNO�
MAI14.03
DRAWING TiTLE'.
LEVELTHREE
ISSUE DATE�.
2015.04.30
SHEET.
A2 3
CDB APPLICATION
!
♦
• �
i 1
� �
CIEAaWATER
3 Nnce,S:� l5t
'�,- e-5 . c, e k �:�.l.
. . !y :
Zep
ISTVAN L PE7ERANEC2
AR94533
FLORIDA
71T1E
`
�
W
�
1
�
Z
Q
G
U
�
U
Q^
I..L
J
LL
�
w
�
�
�
a
w
J
U
ISSUED DRAWING LOG'.
Qor
��e
Qe
�
0
0
�
0
�
�
�
�
PROJECT NO:
MAI14.03
DRAWING TItLE�.
LEVEL FOUR
ISSUE DATE�.
2015.04.30
SHEET.
A2 4
CDB APPLICATION
PANP�p0. -__.-
_
---
�� __. .-._- _ �-- . ��.- ._.. _- �--- - --- — -�--- ___._..- .
-- - ---- . _ . �- - -_.__
_
-- '
„{ _
� �.- - i�' 9�� 14 8" 3t b � i ;� �_ 1� -O�.
__ __. __ . _ ,�. .__.. _. — .._ _- —_�,_ _r-.-- — _-_ . __.-�
__.. 11 O"- — - _- __ . _ ___-.�._:.—�.. .' _ — _ � .
. _____- —.�- .�.—_ .
_ _�
� . '. _ �..� --_- _ .., . - - � - ._ .. . . _7 �
��.._ _-- . _____ _ -_
._... — "�_ �
. P/L �_ __ 1C�' SET6ACK
' �_ _.
/:__.
- / G['�.EEN SCF.EEN
� � / - DECORP,TiVE �
� ��- fEANRE �
/ . /
... / �/ � .. .____:
� _
_-
� / � . ._... _-' .
/:.- � / .. - -f , _„ , i�. 'I�',
� /..-.� �,�___ �� , _.,-_
. ,� �REEN KREEN / �. '-- - . . � � �' _ .
. /�- DE<Of.HTNE �'
� / � FEHTVF� ' - ���r. �-._
�.. � �� � ' . ,:.� . :. �
� / i �:
�/ ��� � j � �
/ �� � '" � `
j / %
/ / ��
i �� � � � ��� �� ��
�/ / FOOL DECK 6ELC�NJ
/ / ,O SF�� .�. / .
\ /
2C" SfEF6A\ Y� -�
ABOVE BFE —�- � �
\ -
\ � �
\ _-- _- - _ __ _-
� -- --
\ �-
1 �-_- __ � I
-- _ i
i------
i
i
I �
� I
vi� I I
22'b` $TEGBAC`KIAT 2C"
qBCVE BFE
- . I
i
�
/L '
( � � _ � � i� � '' ;� i
I I '
� -T , � I }
I � _ � I �� ��
I i � k — ---- _ _ — — , —
_�„ _z. iy,_y„ &
r -- ---�— —�
I
� — — — — , � — — — — — — — — — — — �
� �
-- - � _ - ---- -- - --- - - - _ _ _ - - �
I ---
$. HAMDEN DR.
LEVELSFIVETHRUNINE �� �%
, .'SCAlE�1/16'=t�-0' ���F.
NOTE: PLEASE SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS
FOR EXACT SITE AND ROADWAY
INFORMATION
�
�
:
•
! i
1 {
� �
ClEAR4VATffl
�
i_�: f ... ,�).)a .�.!
ln
ISTVANL.PE7ERANECZ
AR94533
FLORIDA
JECT TI7LE-.
`
�
W
�
��^U
vJ J
Zv
Q�
��
J
�
�
w
�
�
�
Q
w
J
U
ISSUEO DRAWING LOG:
Q o.
Q�e
�e
0
0
0
0
0
�
0
�
PROJECTNO�
MAI14.03
DRAWING TI7LE �
LEVELS 5-9
_. __- - -
ISSUE DATE'. �
2015.04.30
SHEET:
A2 5
CDB APPLICATION