FLD2015-04012a
�l -
� � ��.�����r
;�
MEETING DATE:
AGENDA ITEM:
CASE:
REQUEST:
GENERAL DATA:
Agent... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .. ,
Applicant / Owner... ... ... ...
Location ... . .. . .. ... ... ... ... ... ..
Property Size ... ... ... ... ..
Future Land Use Plan........
Zoning... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .
Special Area Plan ...............
Adjacent Zoning.... North:
South:
East.•
West.
Existing Land Use...........
Proposed Land Use... ... .
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
June 16, 2015
E.1.
FLD2015-04012
Flexible Development application to permit a single-family dock extension
from 53 feet in length to 63.5 feet in length pursuant to Community
Development Code Section 3-601.C.1.g.
Jacob H. Jansen, Docks Inc.
Bill & Vasilik Mazas
152 Devon Drive; located on the north side of Devon Drive approximately 766
feet from the Hamden Drive and Devon Drive intersection.
6,600 square feet (0.151 acres)
Residential Urban (RU)
Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District
N/A
Preservation (P)
Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR)
Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR)
Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR)
.... Detached Dwelling
.... Detached Dwelling
' �-
�
.� ? r i �
f..... ��� t' M. , p
�' r � � 5 _ i` - �:, �.;M.F ".
q .'7'. . S J"P�
v :i `�
£ ��,�'�`� � { � � � t�� . J. i �.
� � - ���
? �
�
� " ; CLEf1RWATER
; HARBOR
i
� _ v,u � . f �
,
' li��.(�i� 1'!'�Lt-� Level II Flexible Development Application Review
.. . ....-��<...b ... . �
ANALYSIS:
Site Location and Existing Conditions:
The subject property is a 0.151 acre site located
on the north side of Devon Drive approximately
766 feet from the Hamden Drive and Devon
Drive intersection. The site features a one-story
detached dwelling and is located within the Low
Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District
with an underlying Future Land Use Plan (FLUP)
category of Residential Urban (RU). The
immediate vicinity is characterized primarily by
detached dwellings between one and two stories.
The existing dock length is 53 feet. The length
of the dock has been 53 feet since 2004 where the
property owner at the time was granted approval
by the City to install a 38.5 x 4 foot walk, a 12
foot x 12 foot header with a 2.5 foot x 12 foot
landing (MIS2004-09004). The adjacent
neighbors signed the application with the
condition that the dock extends no further than
53 feet.
Code Enforcement Analysis:
There are no active Code Compliance cases for
the subject property.
Development Proposal:
The proposal includes a single-family dock with
two boat lifts. As noted earlier the current length
of the dock is 53 feet. The dock will be
extended by 10.5 feet to a length of 63.5 feet.
The boatlifts will be relocated to the extended
dock area to reach deeper water.
The eastern side of the dock will be 16 feet from
the extended property line where 20 feet is
required. The applicants have submitted
documentation that the adjacent property owners
have no objection to the proposed side (east)
setback to dock per Section 3-601.C.l.g.i of the
CDC.
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION
� �
' � p N.T:S.
2�z; ,o°
r ��
r: ^ti,;
y6p , � o . , , , .
; �,
-� '�5, g ^b, . ���� ��� e o,� ^d'�r �� ��^° ��DR$ ��
^ "���� , _ �
i zs� � a °( � � ��'`� '" ���� �
p czEa:Rwa��r
H.4RBOR
ZONING MAP
Overnight �
� accommodation N.T:S.
i g8
T7�; �0�
4A� �';
213 w
276:, � wA6.ryo - .
- o ,� `T 1pw�� --
� � .Wi�p�i ^�w'�y�* ^�'�w $'� �' �w� '�m p�.•J' �n�wy�' m b�vow
,� � '��` .M1 .�'�w- . _ . {7C W /Y DA M ww
�o'r �, Detached dwellings � ��; � ��-�
�
,
316
"' �Q,s CLE�i�'�4��'R-
The eastern boatlift will have a setback of three
feet from the extended property line where a ten ;'333 H�IRBOR
foot setback is required. The applicants have EXISTING SURROUNDING USES MAP
submitted documentation that the adjacent
Community Development Board — June 16, 2015
FLD2015-04012— Page 1
° Clearwater Level II Flexible Development Application Review PLnxrrn�G & nEVEtorn�Nr
- DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION
... �. �... , . ... ..
property owners have no objection to the proposed side (east) setback to boatlift per Section 3-
601.C.1.g.iii of the CDC.
The application is being reviewed as a Level Two, Flexible Development, application consistent
with the recently adopted changes to Section 3-601 through Ordinance No. 8654-15, February 5,
2015. Specifically, Section 3-601.C.l.g.iii, which provides for deviations for dock length may
be approved through a Level Two application subject to conditions being satisfied. The
following report will detail the project compliance with the required conditions.
Comprehensive Plan:
The proposal is supported by various Goals, Objectives and/or Policies of the City's
Comprehensive Plan as follows:
Future Land Use Plan Element
Objective A.S.S - Promote high quality design standards that support Clearwater's image and
contribute to its identity.
The proposal includes the extension of a single-family dock for an existing detached dwelling
which will serve as an accessory use for the property owner. The majority of the surrounding
properties also feature a variety of dock structures as consistent with the sizes of the properties
and frontages along the waterway. The proposal will enhance the existing waterfront use and is
supported by this Objective.
Policy A.S.S.1 Development should be designed to maintain and support the existing or
envisioned character of the neighborhood.
As mentioned above, the proposal is consistent with other docks in the area with regard to the
size and configuration of the subject property, complies with all requirements of the CDC and is
consistent with this Policy.
Community Development Code:
The proposal supports by the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code
as follows:
Section 1-103.B.1. Allowing property owners to enhance the value of their property through
innovative and creative redevelopment.
The property owner seeks to provide a typical amenity of waterfront dwellings, an accessory use
dock with two boatlifts. The dock has been designed to avoid the delineated sea grass beds and
provide adequate water depth for owner's boats. Therefore, the proposal supports this Code
section.
Section 1-103. B. 2. Ensuring that development and redevelopment will not have a negative
impact on the value of surrounding properties and wherever practicable promoting development
and redevelopment which will enhance the value of surrounding properties.
Surrounding properties have been developed with detached dwellings most of which include
docks. The adjacent property owners have no objection to the proposed location of the dock.
The applicant has submitted the neighbors notarized signatures as a part of the dock application.
The proposal will not hinder the redevelopment of adjacent properties nor adversely affect their
value. Therefore, the proposal supports this Code section.
Community Development Board — June 16, 2015
FLD2015-04012— Page 2
' C�l.�l �TRLI.l Level II Flexible DevelopmentApplication Review PL`�vr��rrG&DEV�LOPMENT
� DEVELOPMENT REV�'.W DIVISION
J ,Y?:�.F.. ...,. .�. .. . .
Section 1-103.B.3. Strengthening the city's economy and increasing its tax base as a whole.
The proposal includes an accessory dock to serve the existing detached dwelling use. The
proposal is expected to enhance the value of the property thereby positively contributing to the
City's economy and its tax base. Therefore, the proposal supports this Code section.
Section 1-103.D. It is the further purpose of this Development Code to make the beautification of
the city a matter of the highest priority and to require that existing and future uses and structures
in the ciry are attractive and well-maintained to the maximum extent permitted by law.
The proposal includes adding a 10.5 feet to the length of the dock and relocating of boatlifts. The
extension of the existing dock has been specifically designed to avoid the existing sea grass beds
and provide adequate depth to prevent prop dredging. Therefore, the proposal supports this Code
section.
Section 1-103. E. 5. Preserve the natural resources and aesthetic character of the community for
both the resident and tourist population consistent with the city's economic underpinnings.
As mentioned, the proposal preserves the sea grass beds and should prevent or limit incidents of
prop dredging. The proposal will support the existing detached dwelling and the utilization of
the Clearwater Bay. Therefore, the proposal supports this Code section.
Section 2-801. Intent of the LMDR District and R U FL UP classification.
The CDC provides that the intent of the LMDR District is to protect and preserve the integrity
and value of existing, stable residential neighborhoods of low to medium density while at the
same time, allowing a careful and deliberate redevelopment and revitalization of such
neighborhoods in need of revitalization or neighborhoods with unique amenities which create
unique opportunities to increase property values and the overall attractiveness of the City. The
proposed project is consistent with the Countywide Future Land Use Plan as required by state
law.
Section 2.3.3.1.5 of the Countywide Land Use Rules provides that the purpose of the RU FLUP
classification is to depict those areas of the County that are now developed, or appropriate to be
developed, in an urban low density residential manner; and to recognize such areas as primarily
well-suited for residential uses that are consistent with the urban qualities and natural resource
characteristics of such areas.
The proposal includes an accessory use to an existing detached dwelling as permitted by the RU
FLUP classification. The surrounding area has been developed in accordance with the intensity
of use permitted by the underlying FLUP classification of RU.
Development Parameters:
Docks:
CDC Section 3-601.C.1.a-g provides development criteria and standards for single-family docks.
a. Setbacks. A dock shall be placed in the center one-third of the lot or 20 feet from any
property line extended into the water. The proposed dock will feature a side (west)
setback of 34 feet, which complies with this section. The side (east) setback will be 16
feet from extended waterfront property line. This dock confguration was approved in
2004 (MIS2004-09004) because the applicant submitted documentation that the adjacent
Community Development Board — June 16, 2015
FLD2015-04012— Page 3
� i�iL[t��til�l Level II Flexible Development Application Review PLANNING & DEVELOPtvffiNT
- DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION
. . . ��,s*s, �m.� ,. ..
property owner's have no objection to the proposed modifications to the existing dock,
which complies with Section 3-601.1.g.i.
The extended dock length will maintain the setback to utilize existing structural
components which will allow for safe access to the boatlift.
b. Length. The length of docks and boatlifts shall not exceed 25 percent of the width of the
waterway or half of the width of the property measured at the waterfront property line,
whichever is less, up to a maYimum of 250 feet. The waterfront property length of 60
feet permits a dock length of 30 feet; however, this length would negatively impact the
delineated sea grass beds. Deviations from this section are provided in Section 3-
601.C.1.g and will be addressed within the following portions of this report.
c. Width. The width of docks, excluding boatlifts, shall not exceed 35 percent of the width
of the property measured at the waterfront property line or 50 feet, whichever is less. The
dock width is 10 feet which is less than 35 percent of the 60 foot waterfront property
length (21 feet) and complies with this section.
d. Covered boatlifts. Covered boatlifts are permitted provided a permanent and solid roof
deck is constructed with material such as asphalt shingles, metal, tile or wood. Canvas
and canvas like roof materials are prohibited. Vertical sidewalls are prohibited on any
boatlift or dock. The proposed dock does not include a cover over either boatlift.
Number of docks/slips. No more than one dock structure shall be located at a single-
family dwelling and no dock shall provide more than two slips for the mooring of boats.
Personal watercraft lifts are not considered to be boat slips. The proposed project
includes one dock for the existing single-family dwelling which will have two slips for
the mooring of the residents' boats and complies with this section.
f. Width of catwalks. Service catwalks shall not exceed three feet in width. The proposed
dock does not include any service catwalks.
g. Deviations. ii) No dock shall be allowed to deviate from the length requirements
specified in Section 3-601.C.1.b by more than an additional 50 percent of the allowable
length or project into the navigable portion of the waterway by more than 25 percent of
such waterway, whichever length is less, except as stipulated in Section 3-601.C.l.g.iii
and iv. This deviation would have provided for a dock length of 45 feet which would
negatively impact the delineated sea grass beds. iii) Deviations for dock length in excess
of that which is permitted in Section 3-601.C.l.g.ii above may be approved through a
Level Two (flexible development) approval process only under the following conditions:
a) A dock of lesser length poses a threat to the marine environment, natural
resources, wetlands habitats or water quality;
The proposed dock length of 63.5 feet will extend beyond the limits of the
existing sea grass beds. As shown on the submitted site plan the existing sea
Community Development Board — June 16, 2015
FLD20 1 5-040 1 2— Page 4
� C�e(Ll ��l�l Level II Flexible Develo ment A lication Review PLANTIING& DEVELOPMENT
p PP DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION
�+ �^ ° s�xi
grass beds extend approximately 35 or more feet from the seawall. Based on this
information the seagrass is directly under and affected by the east boatlift. In
order to minimize impacts to the environmentally sensitive areas, the extended
dock distance results in the boatlifts being located outside the seagrass bed areas.
b) A literal enforcement of the provisions of this section would result in extreme
hardship due to the unique nature of the project and the applicant's property.
The waterfront property dimension is 60 feet and the maximum flexibility under a
Level One application would result in a dock length of 45 feet, which based on
aerial photos and site plan would not be an adequate length to extend beyond
environmentally sensitive areas. The proposed dock length of 63.5 feet has
necessitated the submittal of the Level Two application.
c) The deviation sought to be granted is the minimum deviation that will make
possible the reasonable use of the applicant's property.
The extent of the sea grass beds is approximately 35 or more feet. Based on the
information provided as to the location of the seagrass beds, the proposed
extension of 10.5 feet results in the boatlifts being located outside the seagrass
beds. This will ensure that any proposed boating activity by the applicant will
occur outside of the environmentally sensitive area.
d) The granting of the requested deviation will be in harmony with the general intent
and purposed of this section and will not be injurious to the area involved or
otherwise detrimental or of adverse effect to the public interest or welfare. The
proposed dock is in harmony with the general intent and purposed of the section
for the following reason; the proposed length of 63.5 feet is the minimum
flexibility needed in order to have full utilization of a dock at the subject property
without negatively impacting the environmentally sensitive sea grass beds; the
proposed dock is in character with the size, shape and dimensions of docks in the
immediate area; the proposed dock will comply with all other requirements for a
single-family dock; and the proposed dock will not encroach into the navigable
waterway.
Please note that the Harbor Master has reviewed the submittal and has not entered any
commentary prohibiting the proposed dock configuration. It should also be noted that dock
permits are ultimately issued by Pinellas County Water and Navigation.
General Applicability Criteria Requirements:
The proposal supports of the General Applicability requirements of this Code as follows:
Section 3-914.A.1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk,
coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
The proposed dock will be consistent with the character of the area with regard to the scale and
scope of other docks given the width and overall size of the site. A review of approved dock
Community Development Board — June 16, 2015
FLD2015-040 ] 2— Page 5
: Clearwater Level II Flexible Development Application Review PLANNING & DEVELOPbffiNT
- DEVELAPMENT REVIEW DIVISION
� . .x�as�i� �. �"'�"`:� � � ��. ..
permits on Devon Drive found lengths generally range between 28 and 69 feet with the average
being approximately 50 feet in length. Therefore, the proposal supports this Code section.
Area Property Dock Analysis
Address Watertront Lot Width Year Permitted Dock Length
94 Devon Drive f 61 ft. 2012 50 ft.
100 Devon Drive f 56 ft. IJNK 44 ft.
110 Devon Drive f 45 ft. 2013 f 35 ft.
112 Devon Drive f 60 ft. LJNK f 30 ft.
116 Devon Drive f 58 ft. 1992 f 28 ft.
120 Devon Drive f 60 ft. 1992 f 48 ft.
124 Devon Drive t 53 ft. 1990 f 45 ft.
130 Devon Drive f 48 ft. 2005/ 2011 f 50 ft.
132 Devon Drive f 48 ft. 2003 f 55 ft.
136 Devon Drive t 50 ft. 2000/ 2002/ 2008 f 60 ft.
140 Devon Drive f 50 ft. 2013 f 68 ft.
144 Devon Drive f 56 ft. 1999/ 2002 f 70 ft.
I50 Devon Drive t 60 ft. 2001 f 53 ft.
165 Devon Drive f 75 ft. 2011 37.5 ft.
192 Devon Drive f 170 ft. 2007 48.6 ft.
193 Devon Drive f 100 ft. 2004 f 69 ft.
Section 3-914.A.2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and
use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof.
The proposal is generally consistent with the character of adjacent properties with regard to scale
and scope and should enhance that value of the subject property as the improvement costs will
impact the assessed property value. Additionally, the proposed project will not hinder the usage
of adjacent properties as the proposed dock will meet all required setbacks. The proposal will
have no impact on the ability of adjacent properties to be redeveloped. It is not expected that the
proposal will significantly impair the value of adjacent land and buildings. Therefore, the
proposal supports this Code section.
Section 3-914.A.3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of
persons residing or working in the neighborhood.
The proposal extends the existing dock 10.5 feet. The dock will be for the use of the owner.
There will be no fueling, pump out services, boat repairs or public use permitted. The proposal
will likely have no effect on the health and/or safety of persons residing or working in the
neighborhood. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section.
Section 3-914.A.4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
The proposal will likely have minimal effect, negative or otherwise, on traffic congestion as the
dock will be for the utilization of the upland resident of the subject property. Therefore, the
proposal is consistent with this CDC Section.
Section 3-914.A. S. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the
immediate vicinity.
The subject property is consistent with the zoning and future land use category which is
consistent with the surrounding neighborhood. Additionally, the proposed dock is consistent
Community Development Board — June 16, 2015
FLD2015-04012— Page 6
� vie�l 1�1R1�1 Leve� II Flexible Development Application Review
. . . .. ,�.`V; ° .s � . . _ . . .
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
DEVELOPMENT REV�W DIVISION
with the scale and character of other existing docks within the immediate area. Therefore, the
proposal supports this Code section.
Section 3-914.A.6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including
visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties.
The proposed dock should not result in any adverse olfactory, visual and acoustic impacts on
adjacent properties. There will be no fueling, pump out services, boat repairs or public use
permitted. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section.
Section 4-206.D.4: Burden of proof. The burden of proof is upon the applicant to show by
substantial competent evidence that he is entitled to the approval requested.
The applicant has adequately demonstrated through the submittal of substantial competent
evidence that the request is entitled to the approval requested as required by CDC Section 4-
206.D.4.
Compliance with Standards and Criteria:
The following table depicts the development proposals consistency with the standards and
criteria as per CDC Section 3-601.C.1:
Standard Proposed Consistent' Inconsistent
Dock Setbacks Center one-third of lot or 20 feet West: 34 feet X
(Minimum) East: 16 feet X
Boatlift Setbacks Ten feet from property line West: 17 feet X
(Minimum) East: 3 feet X
Tie Pole Setbacks One foot from property line North: N/A X
(Minimum) South: N/A X
Dock Length Half width property at water frontage (30 63.5 feet* X
(Maximum) feet)
Dock Width 35% width of property at water frontage 10 feet X
(Maximum) (21 feet)
� See analysis in Staff Report
* Requires Level Two Revrew
Compliance with General Applicability Standards:
The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General
Standards for Level One and Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3-914.A:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage,
density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of
adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons
residing or working in the neighborhood.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate
vicinity.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual,
acoustic and olfactorv and hours of oneration imnacts on adiacent nronerties.
� See analysis in Staff Report
Community Development Board — June 16, 2015
FLD2015-04012— Page 7
Consistent� Inconsistent
X
X
X
X
X
X
' vl��i ►'t�L�l Level II Flexible Development Application Review
� ... . . r�,�a-'`, a..°.?'. .
PLANAIING & DEVELOPMENT
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION
Compliance with Flexibility Criteria:
The Flexibility Criteria for a single-family dock are set forth in Section 3-601.C.l.g.iii;
Deviations for dock length in excess of that which is permitted in Section 3-601.C.l.g.ii may be
approved through a Level Two (flexible development) approval process only under the following
conditions of a-d which are set forth in the following table:
a. A dock of lesser length poses a threat to the marine environment, natura! resources,
wetlands habitats or water qualiry; and
b. A literal enforcement of the provisions of this section would result in extreme hardship
due to the unique nature of the project and the applicant's property; and
c. The deviation sought to be granted is the minimum deviation that will make possible the
reasonable use of the applicant's property; and
d. The granting of the requested deviation will be in harmony with the general intent and
purpose of this section and will not be injurious to the area involved or otherwise
detrimental or of adverse effect to the public interest and welfare.
i See analysis provided by the applicant in the application submittal
Consistent' Inconsistent
X
X
X
X
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials
at its meeting of May 7, 2015, and deemed the development proposal to be legally sufficient,
based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law:
Findings of Fact:
The Planning and Development Department, having reviewed all evidence submitted by the
applicant and requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that there is substantial
competent evidence to support the following findings of fact:
l. The 6,600 square foot (0.151 acre) subject property is located on the north side of Devon
Drive approximately 766 feet from the Hamden Drive and Devon Drive intersection;
2. The subject property is located within the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District
and the Residential Urban (RU) Future Land Use Plan category;
3. The subject property is not located in a special area plan;
4. The proposal is to extend the length of the existing dock from 53 feet dock to 63.5 feet and
relocate existing boatlifts beyond environmentally sensitive area (seagrass beds);
5. The existing property features 60 feet of linear water frontage;
6. The proposal includes a dock with a length of 63.5 feet; a width of 10 feet; a side (west)
setback of 34 feet to dock; a side (west) setback of 17 feet to boatlift; a side (east) setback of
16 feet to dock; and a east (side) setback of 3 feet to boatlift;
7. That the proposal will serve as an accessory use to the existing detached dwelling; and
8. That there is no active Code Compliance case for the subject property.
Conclusions of Law:
The Planning and Development Department, having made the above findings of fact, reaches the
following conclusions of law:
1. That the development is consistent with applicable portions of the City's Comprehensive
Plan;
2. That the development is consistent with the General Purposes of the CDC pursuant to Section
1-103;
Community Development Board — June 16, 2015
FLD2015-04012— Page 8
� C1L�1 �t�l�l Level II Flexible Develo ment A lication Review PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT
p PP DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION
- � �� ��. .
3. That the development is consistent with the standards for pocks pursuant to CDC Section 3-
601;
4. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level One and
Two Approvals pursuant to CDC Section 3-914.A; and,
5. That the application is consistent with the requirement for the submittal of substantial
competent evidence pursuant to CDC Section 4-206.D.4.
Based upon the above, the Planning & Development department recommends APPROVAL of
the Flexible Development application to permit a single-family residential dock extension from
53 feet in length to 63.5 feet in length where 30 feet in length is allowed pursuant to Community
Development Code Sections 3-601.C.1.a and 3-601.C.1.g., subject to the following conditions:
Conditions of Approval:
1. That the proposed dock and boatlift be for the exclusive use by the resident of the detached
dwelling;
2. That the applicant shall revise the dock permit/site plan to show the dock addition dimension
as 10.5 feet;
3. That fueling, pump out services, boat repairs or public use be prohibited;
4. That a Building Permit be obtained for the proposed boatlift; and,
5. That a Private Dock Permit be obtained from Pinellas County Water and Navigation.
Prepared by Planning and Development Department Staff:
Kevin urnberger, Planner III
Community Development Board — June 16, 2015
FLD2015-04012— Page 9
Looking norCh at subject dock
����� �- . . . . .�a�� � �
..:' . � � � � ' .+-�
.. .. . f uXk° �
.- -'4' _%m�, (��' r - ,,.. 'l�Y7
..w. �"��.-.aur,e .�.,x0. .... �
�, r ��°�..n<A '�` -i �. �4�
ar�' v �� .�M�`� �i�p. .• 4Y �-�'S�t �
� � ..� . .. . u .,,,a. x?`'t$. � ��. _.... ^.��' . . . .. ,,. -.�
�_U�lhl[1P..'21�1 I��utli �•i11;�:Ci'J(�l.F
�+�'
�_t1Uh7lli Il��t"Ih dl �iih�C�� �.l!'�h
__
�
p.�� : �i�
��. .1_._ '1-' :1 �.�
'.'�� ,��1.
�
�,�, � ' �
V °�"
�
'i I
�-
� neQ�r�s� . , �
��rw�wrs
�vwcnr��r
. �.[Jf<ft�tl
vm �rwrr � �
���ar�r�- +, �c
� � i.",�4�. y;��'y�� ���;,���
X"'rj� ; e� � ' ..
� �.
� .
� � • 1,t,. ,,�, i -
, ,
_ � ._. ��._�,.:..--..,,der • ' I 1
✓'.'sYl �.._J•1�.�.`�CD.:! M. ._ ..
y ' �
I%' I
� ..� �',�.. � ' ��
� � . �` „°�y,-�' _ __... _ �::....�..::
G � f= . �
�� �� ..
unhn��� ni,rn� ir��n ��1�'� ,��I •ul���'ii �iu_'I�..
� r .. ._ ._. �F
�T! �}��'-•.ci2 `r' � Y'.'1 ...'oi�::.v � .�. _.. =�+�i�ii
152 Devon Drive
FLD2015-04012
Kevin W. Nurnberger
100 S Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, FL 33756
727-562-4567ext2502
kevin.nurnber er(a�m�clearwater.com
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
Planner III March 2011 to present
Planner II October 2010 to March 2011
City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida
Duties include performing the technical review and preparation of staff reports for various land
development applications, the organization of data and its display in order to track information and
provide status reports, and making presentations to various City Boards and Committees.
Planner
County of York, Yorktown, Virginia 2007 to 2009
Reviewed residential, commercial and mixed use development site plans to ensure compliance with
planning, zoning, subdivision, historic preservation, and environmental standards as well as design
criteria, specifications, regulations, codes and ordinances. Led pre-application meetings with residents,
neighborhood organizations, contractors, and developers regarding future projects which included state
and local government agencies.
Site Assistant
Gahan and Long Ltd, Belfast, Northern Ireland 2006 to 2007
Enforced Article 3 of the Planning Order (NI) with land owners, developers and district councils on
procedures relating to archaeological and built heritage remains on proposed development sites. On site
assistant to project manager during the archeological process throughout the pre-development stage.
Development Planner
Versar Inc, Fort Story/Fort Eustis, Virginia 2005 to 2006
Developed survey strategies for the Cultural Resource Manager by reviewing local and state planning
documents, the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Preservation Planning on Federal installations,
the Virginia Department of Historic Resources, the Virginia Department of Transportation plan, and
Virginia Power's public utility plan in the predevelopment stages of new development and building
expansion projects to ensure protection of historic properties.
City Planner
City Planning Commission, New Orleans, Louisiana 2000 to 2005
Primary subdivision planner assisting applicants throughout the subdivision process in accordance with
the zoning and subdivision regulations of the City of New Orleans. Reviewed various zoning and
conditional use applications. Prepared and presented staff reports to the City Planning Commission and
Board of Zoning Adjustments.
EDUCATION
University of New Orleans, LA
MA Urban and Regional Planning (2004)
State University of New York at Buffalo, NY
BA Anthropology (1999)
Planning & Developrnent Department
�� earwater Flexible Develo ment A lication
p pp
`� Detached Dwellrngs, Duplexes orAssociated Accessory Use/Structures
IT IS INCUMBENT UPON THE APPLICANT TO SUBMIT COMPLETE AND CORRECT INFORMA710N. ANY MISLEADING, DECEPTIVE,
INCOMPLETE OR IPJCORRECT INFORMATION MAY lNVALIDATE YOUR APPLICATION.
ALL APPLICATIONS ARE TO BE FlLLED OUT COMPLETELY AND CORRECTLY, AND SUBMITTED IN PERSON (NO FAX OR DELIVERIES)
TO THE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY NOON ON THE SCHEDULED DEADLiNE DATE.
� A TOTAL OF 11 COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS AND APPLICATION MATERIALS (1 ORIGINAL AND 10 COPIES)AS REQUIRED WITHIN
ARE TO BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW BY THE DEVELOPMEN7 REVIEW COMMITTEE. SUBSEQUENT SUBMITTAL FOR THE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD WILL REqUIRE 15 COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS AND APPLICATION MATERIALS (1 ORIGINAL
ANp 14 C9PIESl. PLANS AND APPLICATIONS ARE REQUIRED TO BE COLLATED, STAPLED AND FOLDED INTO SETS.
THE APPLICANT, BY FILING THIS APPLICATION, AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF THE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE.
FIRE DEPi i�Y�EUMF�Rv �ITE i�LAN REVIEW fEE: $200
APPLICATION FEE: 300
PROPERTY OWNER (PER DEED):
MAILING ADDRESS:
PHONE NUMBER:
EMAIL
NUCIVI VRf1CrIlCJGIVIHIIVC.
MAILING ADDRESS:
PHONE NUMBER:
EMA�L:
1"3►1, o,••a t7FtS �, ICk• V1� AZA S
� Sa� �� �l o�r'e 'i�Q C�C4 f� C.74�d�� � �� b'� _
'1 �'1 b�� • 143a.$
3 t�'1 Pk Z A S �4� . Ca w.
�_)'r� CaL�� Jl� 1LSL✓� '� o G�C S, �'n. C. _
bce 3� q Z�' t�,tic.11�S �r k, �"� 33°7 'S�__—
� i� 531� - � � '4►4 _
1�1. _(3 �CaLS �'rl� D�O Q-f��� � . C.ow�
ACDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: I S� �� �U �. �L• C.I�f�l.W�a�CF �L �3�7 �."'7
PARCEL NUMBER(S): p� - e7•� —��j —c.7� �{ � y"'OOO - a ��O
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: T�a�t�,� d„Q Sc,a,l.� L��. I$ Q,.s� (,(ar�,E;( �O °(S�. ���',,Gr�,�
PROPOSED USE(S): ���td �(,y{.,�� 1n•t ' '���{� 'j�oC�C p...dl �•��" S�rf��u t� ,
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST:
Specifically identify the request
(include aN requested code flexibility;
e.g., reduction in required number of
parking spaces, heighi, setbacks, !oi
;ize, loc width, spedfic use, etc.j
�Cu�aS,tc�. `�o L1C �J \ �� �i�r �C-fi� eX ��' 'W � �-cK �,�1.�.�t 5 : n
1en�,� a�c�wd� �1�a-•' �,e.ol tir•.! � � uSt . _
Planning & Development Department, 1G0 S. Myrtle Avenue, Ciearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865
Page 1 of 7 Revised 01/12
��
� Cl�arwat�r
�
Planning & Development Department
Flexible Development Application
Data Sheet
PLEASE ENSURE THAT THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS FILLED OUT, IN ITS ENTIRETY. fAILURE TO COMPLETE THIS FORM
WILL RESULT IN YOUR APPLICATION BEING FOUND INCOMPLETE AND POSSI6LY DEFERRED UNTIL THE FOLLOWING
APPUCATION CYCLE.
ZONING DISTRICT:
FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATION:
EXISTING USE (currently existing on site):
PROPOSED USE (,new use, if any; plus existing, if to remain)
SITE AREA: (,p t(p bp sq. ft.
GROSS FLOdR AREA (total square footage o� all buildingsj:
Existing: � �� sq. ft.
Proposed: (J � � sq. ft.
-�-
Maximum Allowabie: �t :q. ft.
C, ,1' � •�. �.
Reg�de.�� �q� u
'T) G�i�.�.�.d. l� �-1 t, n y
���raG�..� `JWC.� 1��14
p, 1 �j � acres
GROSS FLOOR AREA (toia� square footage devoted to each use, ii there wlll be rnultlple uses):
First use: sq. ft.
Second use: sq. ft.
T,hirri iisa: �i �%� _ so,. ft.
-�'---
FLOOR AREA RATIO (total square footage of ail buildings divlded by the total square footage o� entire site).
Existing:
Proposed: --� _�___
Maximum Allowable: � �
N ��
BUILDING COVERAGE/FOOTPRINT (1" floor square footage of all buiidings):
Existing: ��ri sq• ft. (��_ % of site)
Proposed: sq. ft. ( % of site)
Maximum Permitted: _�v�_�_ sq. ft. 1�_ % of site)
GREEN SPACE W ITHIN VEHICULAR USE AREA (green space within the parking lot and interior of site; not perimeter buffer)
Existing: sq. rt. ( % of site)
Proposed sq. ft. ( % of site)
VEH�CULAR USE AREA (parking spaces, drive aisies, loading area).
Exlsting: �f _�_ �q. ft I % of site)
Proposed�. sq. ft. ! `/� of site)
Planning � Gevelopment Depariment, 10� 5. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567, Fax: 727-562-4865
Page 2 of 7 Revised 01112
IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RATIO (total squar? footage of Impervicus areas divided by the total squere footage oi entire sitel.
Exlsiing:
Proposed: /�%
Maximum Permltied:
DENSITY (units, rooms or beds per acre):
Existing:
Proposed: N
Maximum Permitted:
OFF-STREET PARKING:
Existing: /+%
Proposed:
Minimum Required: /�/ �
BUILDING HEIGHT:
Existing:
Proposed:
Maximum Permitted
- ' _-�J'
�
_1 /!��-
Note: A parking demand study must be provided !n conjunctron with any request
to reduce the amount of required off-sTreet parking spaces. Please see the
odopted Parking Demand Study Guidelines for further information.
WHAT IS `:'L �Ss 9P.:.-:(EL' �iOTAI VALUE OF THE PROJECT UPON COMPLETION?
ZONING DISTRICTS FOR ALL ADIACENT PROPERTY:
North: �
soutn
East:
West:
ij-
�� � �
i `�, �c:�.'�.@�+
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS
I, the undersigned, ackno�Nledge that all Swom to and subscribed before me this 3 � day of
representaticns made in this application are irue and
accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize M��"� 2� orby
City rEe��sentatives to visit and photograph the ��c.s 'Sw- .� � who Is rsonally known h s
N.j ;,e : ribed in this application. roduc� d �
� � P __ �-- _-----� i i cat i o n.
or representative Notary public,
f�ly commissio� expires:
<M:; rN�•
.�. �•., BRUCE NESTI
=+: �- MY COMMISSION # FF 153207
� ; EXPIRES; Augusf 21 2018
�"",',o� ��, Bonded Thru Notary Public Underrri(ars
?lanning 3 Development Department, 100 S. tJlyrtle Avenue, Ciearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865
Paqe 3 of 7 Revised 01112
c Planning & Developrnent Department
� C ear�vater Flexible Development Application
Site Plan Subm�ttal Package �heck li��
IN ADDITION TO THE COMPLETED FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT (FLD) APPLICATION, ALL FLD APPL�CATIONS FOR A SINGLE-FAMIIY
DETACHED DWELLING, DUPLEX, OR ACCESSORY USE/STRUCTURE ASSOCIATED WITH EITHER A SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED
DWELLING OR DUPLEX SHALL INCLUDE A PLOT PLAN WITH THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION:
�.y Responses to the General Applicability criteria as set forth in Section 3-914.A. The attached Flexible Development Applicatlon
General Applicability Criteria sheet shall be used to provide these responses.
� Responses to the fiexibility criteria for ihe specific use(s) being requested as set forth in the Zoning District(s) in which the
subject property is located. The attached Flexible Development Application Flexibility Criteria sheet shall be used to provide
these responses.
�J A signed and seale'd survey of the property prepared by a registered land surveyor fnciuding the location of the property,
dimensions, acreage, location of all current structures/improvements, location of all public and private easements including
official records book and page numbers and street right(s)-of-way within and adjacent to the site.
�\�C1 If the 2ppllcation would result in the removal or relocation of mobile home owners residing in a mobile horne park as
provided in F.S. § 723.083, the application must provide that information required by Section 4-202.A.5.
hd if this application is being submitted for the purpose of a boatlift, catwalk, davit, dock, marina, pier, seawall or other similar
marine structure, then the application must provide detailed plans and specifications prepared by a Fiorida professional
engineer, bearing the seal and signature of the engineer, except signed and sealed pians shall not be required for the repair
or replacement of decking, stringers, railing, lower landings, tie piles, or the patching or reinforcing of existing piling on
private and commercial docks.
��� A tree survey showing the location, DBH (diameter at breast height), and species on the parcel proposed for devetopment
with a DBH of four inches or more and identifying those trees proposed to be removed.
❑ A site plan with the following information:
�.d North arrow, scale, location map and date prepared.
� Location of the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL), whether the oroperty is located within a Special Flood Hazard
Area, and the Base Flood Elevation (BFE) of the property, as applicable.
� Locaiion, setbacks and use oi all �xi�ti^.g and proposed building and structures.
❑ Location of all existing and proposed parking areo�, �idewalks and driveways.
❑ Location, type of material and height of all existing and proposed fences.
❑ Location of all existing and proposed utliities, including water, sewer, gas, and stormwater.
❑ Location of all existing utility easements, including Official Records book and page numbers, and any proposed utility
easements.
� Building or structure elevation drawings that depict the proposed building height, buliding materiais, and concealment of
all mechanical equipment located on the roof.
?lanning & Ueveloprnent Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearv+ater; FL 33�56; Tei: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865
Page 4 of 7 Revised 01/12
� Clearwater
Planning & Development Department
Flexible Development Application
General Applicability Criteria
PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO EACH OF THE SIX (6) GENERAL APPL►CABILITY CR�TERIA EXPLAINING HOW, IN DETAIL, THE
CRITERION IS BEING COMPLIED WITH PER THIS DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL.
1.
2.
The proposed development oi the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent
properties in which it is located.
1�� c���ic�,S �A� •, ^ �c,t M b ��-i w , � � c� a �'��� �.� -Dnc, k,s c, ,..� �. � � �
o r.. � �R �. ��� � . �o o � �-1�..e 1 o t� �c.ic �a.c.. ! � �-� =c s C I oSes � �o
�f'1�",S Pn�o.�c-�-, n►-�. ���c�d �kiP.n� �i-��, n�e� ��c�C-.
The proposed �evelopment will not hinder or d(scourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings
or significanily impair the value thereof.
, .� r- —
,. The proposFd development will not adversely affect the health or szfety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood
of the proposed use.
���c.,,�.y, c,�,rK �cl� n�k c.a,�.Sc ��� hw1`� .r
!+7
�
,a {
u�,s .t fl��-t� � ��s he � -•�, rw r �o rw�s.� : -, � r1 tv o_� 0'4��. �i,ti � .
4. Thz prcposed development is deslgned to minimize traffic congestion.
k�5
rc de���,e..� ka S�on co,� �9�s4-�o� -�-�- c.�.ld oc..c,�r ,�� bo�,k
.� . `_� �1�� � r .
.- :. •:�, �,_ :.=� �.. L%� tnf-lu • -•g t" e, C Y�J° .�, ;. a. u�i: - �5,�` ��.c ,0.� pt— t� � � � c � � � c � �
� � ��l.e � P�eC��sS ���.�� bo,.�- 1. F-1... (1e� �S �; .z � r If A11o�,J �'e�s+- e�sj
taGCeSS o.. c�,,...L. a � �'-o� � � ��. �.F, 2.LSu � �+.C1� e,. � �ao.�.t i' � •
5. The proposed developrnent is consistent with the community character of the imm diate vicinity of the parcel proposed for
development.
���"b� �i9^�5 Gil`t C.ew-`>' ►�n� (,,,j t'!'�"� Lr t S�-�n.� �c�C,� ��'�..c.�-uPt`� �-�'
3?e4�:rt h�,.�- �'.%�-S or W•.Ak ,Mont_'�_'�_. (o Cf i� t��+n+vledaa�..E hC���6.��
�-�c,�l� � e,�k.-.� �c�C> G..dQ I��-S �� �l„e ��... 7 c-��Qswt ��y.. s�o v►�tno r
� ��5.
6. The design of the proposed development minlmizes adverse effects, induding visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of
operation impacts, on adjacent properties.
:`� �.�a 1,.� i�� ��'C!H 1�W � �L r,15d A..a� .�N i eC� r'1 � .1 r--i� i s� il 01.J
�1 h� �+ ` ?L. (` [„ � � c �.�( '� `� � �S���S ' 1 r � O r 1�'\ JJ �"jp[:-�- ; n '1"t'^% n �.. ''{� � aCi C
�
�ac�.�;4s, n� 1 � �,akr .
Ptanning & Deveicpment Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4507; Fax: 727-562-�i865
Page 5 of 7 Revised 01/12
= Clear�ater
Planning & Development Department
Flexibie Development Application
Flexibility Criteria
PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO THE APPLICABLE FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR THE SPECIFIC USE(S} BEING REQUESTEd AS SET
FORTH IN THE ZONIN6 DISTRICT(5) IN WHICH THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED. EXPLAIN HOW, IN DETAIL, EACH CRITERION
IS BEING COMPLIED WITH PER THIS DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL (USE SEPARATE SHEETS AS NECESSARY).
(G`� f�- docl� o� �,�k �� t�ssec- Ic�yk� r��s a�-cc�� �,�r.�►�
�v .�e, s5 � , �'i+�. c"�. . -c' ' n � P�CGtsS
c� �aoa� \•��c �� S4.ti1 \o�a � A-�er c�1 , s-��r b5 �1+-e. SA�.� , G�"4s S u,J� d�'�.r� n.s
l'aJ1 ..1row � S 4 n '� 4�i a 3%0. 4�t� t A'�1 ��[ �'t � N°i oa i'�.�� � 1 �� �.J) ��QS �.J � � 1
A\\�e�.1 S Pa� �(c.esS �CO �0 1., �-� w � %^�� �° �C�o (` � S l � o� �'l,,e. �o � � i • �r �
�R.��� G�-- ��Y��� _ �oCy�,a_i�.
�13� P� le�rH� en�occ�cew.c�n-�t' osr k4�. �suu rS�flnS Q� -�(�;S Sec,���� wc�.�ld cc�� �-I
� 1 ¢.�C �C'c' < �n-4 � rd. Sl,. n S � �4 � � � �(if r`� �{ ,�� .[aA U.Sv� �t_.Se t1"�
e�� �,.���e�° �rko r� is .�,,, S��r►,, dc�;�.1.0 ��i�-r ��- �`�5 ��a�r�� �1,�,�4-P
�S t �.uS�d ��. e�cc�t� � � ►�, � � �' .� 1� d , �c �r r.,�...� � a ..d :. �r� ..� a-F
P`F g�;-�� �oe�C- 5"1'� f� i�l�Gl r^ �'S C.k,trS �•-.h ii i�a6i c"d .S� �l� .-, V�oo r� n�y G�y 4�t�, ��a
Ct �- t�Lt[ 1��'t ri� (' ���1 t T'f Y�+ n�r S. --
���
�AG�� � �joq�. ,j;t�c°',t' 1:*p___4A`�`r�'•..,_n�u� /��Q�� � i4��C ,-•, �L`9�tj.--u�. ----
�,r,v�r�,.�,r�....�1 �.wna.�k3 d�, sl,wllo,.� I...ds �..d S.o.���s�.
C�� � �.�:�.� ,� �'�.:5 �`e��,..eS�-' t,���� �at �� �r,���-, W t� � ��.�rt.��
4� � �Ec.�-��a� "?SGau.st � is�,CCin�(� pcj (1u�" \�'J I1.46°Vh.u/�ti
W 1�' � e[�i S�t .^ u �o c�G 5: � �'�e � C� a_ �\S� 1, � t� � [� 1� o..J AGc� SS ��eE. ,pt �'
Wa�4CC �O .�ann�R S�k�irt oa � � �.rc. 4cl � �, ���5 a....� I�SS � � n � � -+�Da � � o�,
� ag5 i'1 S"r t+�•• � a�- �e � o w 4 O. F.� . `1"�"• �� t'� CtJ O:8 5 r 4•� i�J 1 �� P►1 �o �J
r� S � r_,r� dS� r.d �a.�:o r C,...rs .-�'� ��I -�c r oa-�-a r �c.,, lo rS ,- .� -��v C� �`! �
Pianning 8 Deveiopn�ent Departm2nt, 100 S. P�lyr�le A'venue, Clearwater, FL 3"5755; Te!: 727-562-4567�, Fax: 727-562-4865
Page 6 of 7 Revised 01112
y ����„�T���� Planning & Developrnent Department
T���� Flexible Development Application
Afficiavit to Authorize Agent/Representative
l. Provide names of all property owners on deed — PRINT full names.
� � 11 �1� zflS
�J P�S i 1���L.; �I�`1 Az�S
2. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property.
��..�� � a.� -,� C I�arc„� ��e.c', �[_ 33'1 �.'1
3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for (describe request):
���� na �C�C a«.� � - �C'Lc �'c'O C�+�il"c� lr-�a�C � .
4. Thai the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint:
�S�F� �P1R�cii c�...�% ��r�[�S .�l�
as (his/their) agent(s} to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affeci such petition;
S. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described
proper*��;
6. Tha*, site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order io process this application and the owner
authorizes Clty representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application;
7. Tnat (I/we), the undersigned au orit��, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct.
Property wner Property Owner
Properiy �Jwner
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Propertp Qwner
BEFORE ME THE UNDERSIGNED, AN OFFICER DULY COMMISSIONED BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, ON
�
TH15 � �� ��'� ' DAY OF l�"'( �"1" I�� � � , ��7 � �� , PERSONALLY APPEARED
� � L L (,��,% s ��f't" Z�.� WHO HAVING BEEN FIRST DULY SWORN
DEP _ _ ._�. _ � �'`� 1P�fDERSTAN
.�„���„
.os�"'�e's, HAY�EE VELEZ �
�� ° c Not�ry Public • State oi Florida k
�; My Comm. Expires Jan 31, 2017 � _. -
�a, ����r� Commissioa # EE 870424 E
Notar✓ SeaUStamp
S`THE CGNTENTS OF THE AFFIDAVIT THAT HE/SHE SIGNED.
l' i'� . ..1�
Nly Commission Exp
Notary Public Signature
_ �;t.i ,�
_ � t •
Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756; 7ei: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865
Page 7 of 7 Revised 0'l/12
SECTION . . .Z. . . , TOWNSHIP . . 25 . . SOU7H� RANGE . . 15 . . EAST, . . . . . PlNEII.AS COUNTY� FLGRfDA
�ViW t7\JflYG1
---- ----------- O --------------------
�,
r (iYPICALj —.� � 'i
± � e
�
\�` UV�ULSVV �r� �WP�-'"\� So
� I�
6ENCH MAR!(
LPi08M�1
'-lEV.= 3.84' IJ.A Y.D. 88
FN6'%' (P.O.L}
4C+7'04'03'W, 3.3TNC
Of COFWFR 1.2' CONC. SEAWAll
4e N89'43'30°E _
' N89'43'2E"E �
-----�-
<�w
azs'n -
F
�
ssr =�a
U
c�
��li I
��
i�
0.6SY[
3 �
oa
��
.- o
0 0
O O
zz �
60"R
w er+oY. as �or i�
60'R
F
'�' 4
.� ,�
�
m
I> 43? -�
�
�,'_ '�_'a:�; =h
LOT 18
FOUNDAl10rl AN�
EXISiiNG WALLS
13.97
e
4�
7Lfi'
�
ia3f '''�,
� `�
- FNU '%' (P.O.I)
NW'09'40'W, 3.251!C
OF CORNER
�-�
- - � Pur�c ` -
e�nx�w un�
LEGEND
�
.'� 5.t�' ,'-0�0 - EIEVATION
• - PdWER POLE
B - RECLAIMED WATER lAE1Ek
a - TELEPHONE PEDESTAL
� � - wanR ���T�
�4 ----- -O�RHEAD N9RES
'oo 0
-- a
�
�
� � Zrj' W W
n �
m b�
�p
g o
N (tJ
�g
0
N89"43'30'E fiO�R 589'43'30'W 75'R
N89'41'12�E 59.67'FI fCN 4"x4' fG,1 4'K4° $g951'45°W 75.05'tl
�}— .—.. . .—.. ..—..—:;r--_..—..
FlPt/� - � S69'43'30"W 60'R;-60.23'M-p----
S.W. CCK7NFR ` G BP.G RfF. LINf IHLET
G L6T 17 „ sr � 7 CURB �
� r � I" �----�� ON-SIiE iBM
N _
6N-SITE TBtd r� "o a�v�. ee
SET N&T ��� .��� ✓ �_
fL= 119 NAV.D, E8 y' as \
--- ------�- - 50' R/W :(20' ASPHALT)----�----C cur� iN�Er ----
mP uFV� t�o
LEGAL 6ESCRIPifON nemera.=a�
—O
; �a a':a'
.E C6ANEfi UF
:,ME V�ES7 is,
o� �oT w
LOl 18, REPtAT OF BAYSIDE SUBOIMSION, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT 'MEREOF AS RECORDm IN PLAT BOOK 23, PA6ES 18 AND 19, Of THE PUBUC
RECORDS 4F PINELIAS COUNTY, R�A, TOGETIiER tN7H, BUT VNtHOUT WARRANTY, AlL OF GRAIdTOR'S RIGHT, 1171E AND INIEREST W AND TO 1HAT CERTAtN
PARCEL OF LAHD 111NG BE1WfEN 1NE Na2THERLY AND SOUIHERLY PRO�C110NS OF LOT 18 ANO 7NAT PORTION OF 1HE BULKHEAD LINE L11NG NORTHERLY
iHEREOF, BEING MORE PARTICULARi.Y DESCRIBFA AS 7HAT P14Rt�1. OF LAND LYUIG NORiH OF SAIU LOT 18 AND 80UNDED ON THE NOR1N BY 1HE BUUMEAD IJNE
SHUYAi thi PUT OF SAID SU�141SION LYING NOKTH OF SA� LOT 18, ON i4� SOUTH BY THE NOR1H BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 18, CN! TF� riEST BY AN EXtENS10td
t�lOR1HERLY OF THE WEST BDUNDARY � LOT 18 AND ON TF1E EAS7 BY AN EXiENSbtd NORIHERLY 4F 7HE EAST BOUNDARY Of SMD LOT 18.
F1006 Z�
THE ABOYE DESCR�D PROPERtIf APPEARS TO BE MI ZONE AE (B.F.E= 11�), IN ACCORDANCE N11H THE FIRM 61AP QF THE CITY � CLEARWAlER, PINELLAS C()lJNTY,
CAMIIUNITY NUL(BER 125Q96 {NkP NUMBFR 12103C-0102-G), t�RP DAiED SEPTE�BER 3. 2003.
PREPARED FOR: BILL W. �IAZAS
CER7IFICA'lION: 1 HQiEB't CFA7&Y TO 1HE BEST Cf YY KlklYf�fDGE ANO BELEF
i(IA7 1F� �RYEY SHQNN fiF1�CN ABSTNt11FllY iffElS 7FiE MR91lUM TEGUNCAL
STAN�hN05 FOR LPND SURVE1Ri� U� IN 7tIE 5TA7E Cf FLORmA RIAE 5J-1],
F.0.0 fUIllNEliNqtE, iFp$ CEIIIIF1CAtlQH 9WL tlpT El(1EH� TO FNY O1NER PERSWS
6R PAFIIES 611#P 7NAN 1NQ� NWED qi TWS 9JRVEY NN SHALL NOT BE
VAL�D AND BMUWG Af',AINST 7HE UNOFR9(�'� AIRtfYIXt WIMWT 1HE IX21pN11
RPI� MA 5 OF . URVflOA FN� MAPPER.
GEORGE A. SFAMP II, FI.ORIDA REqS LAND SURYEYOR Na. 25i2
GEQRGE A SHNAP Iq, PROfES90NAL SURVEYOR 6c MAPPER Ho. 6737
ms sw+�r is rioT caurt�h a� vwo uw�ss anacH�n ro suav�oas �ra�r.
DA7E SURVEYED:
G80R6� A. SEIAlP II
AND ASSOGTATES, INCORPORATED
LAND SURVEYORS LAND PLANNERS
330! !leSOTO 90ULdZ'.IIPD, SUlTB D
R.C. PAGN 6,fh'BO/P FLOR/DA 34685
LB 1834 PBONC' (727) 784-5496 F�P /7P7) 786->256
:� � s . � � •
ROADS
Major Roads
Road Names
Arterial
Road
PARCELS
Parcel Polygore�
SCALE 1 : 2,942
�—=r-=-�.--------- - -
0 200 400
FEET
L1 � ,
. �s
1 S �. �cU-o n '� (z.
�p�� �3,�
o� �
-�ttr�://qis.pineilascountv.ora/public aislmwf/publicais nad27.mwf Mondav. March 30. 2015 3:58 P
��� i� i ��
Direct all correspondence to:
Clerk, Water and Navigation; 5�' Fioor
315 Court Street
� learwater, FL 33/5�
r��`�o�a-�
Application �
(OFFICAL UgE ON�,Y)
PRIVAiE DOCK PERMIT APPLICATIOI`d
PINELLAS COUNTY WATER AND NAVIGATION
I. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATIOI�:
A. Applicant's Name BILL MAZAS,
B. Mailing Address: 152 DEVON DR
CLEARWATER FL 33767-2438
Telephone No. 772-688-2828 E-mail Address:bmazas@me.com
�I. A.GENT I1�TFORM�TION:
A. Namz:
�. Address:
�i��, S#ate, Zip
C, Telephone Na. (727) 536-6786
I)OCI�S, INC.
��:�� 9��7D AVE N.
PII�TELLAS PARK, FL 337�2
E-mail address: docksinc(�a,tampabay.rr.com
dockssates(a�tampabav. rr.c om
iake(�a,docksincorporated.com
ffi. SITE II�'OI�1V�A'I'ION:
A. Construction Site Address: as above
City,
State: ��. Zip
�. Parcel ID Number �c��27-1. 5-049 � 4-���-01 �Q
C. Incorporated [x] Unincorporated [] CLEARWATER
D, Affected Water Body: CLEARWATER HARBOR
E. Previous Permits: P3484504 P42742-13
F. Date applicant asst�rr}Prl �ro�em� otiv��rship� Aug 12 2005 s
G. Obstructions: (�ogs, iences, ete. j i�tice
H, l�ttach 8-1/2"xl l." vicinity map showing specific project location.
I. All other information pursuant to Sectian 166-329 and 166-330, Pinellas County C;ode; as
.�. For projects requiring a public hearing, attach a copy af the complete legal descriptior�.
`��` ��� (
� � ��. � � �, °. �� -
Applicatiori #
IV. FFcOJECT UESCRIPTION:
�(OFFICIAL USE ONLY}
A. Nature and Size ofProject: REPLACE EXISTING DOCK 6'X38' WALKOUT 22'Xl0'HEAD
3'x10'Lower dock move existin� lift out 15' add boat lift on right side of dock
Square Feet 254 Existing
227 New
481 Total
�. Variance: Yes X No
Amount in variance:
Setbacks:
Other:
Length: 33.5' Width:
Left: 3' Right:l7'
NQ'TE: It is the applicant's responsibility to clearly demonstrate that any requested variances are consistent with the
variance criteria of Section 166-291 of tl�e Pinellas County Code. The applicant must demonstrate that a literal
ey�=`:,i;,c :°�`_:-:�.= :<f k�� regulations would result in an extreme hardshi� �:�,�v to th� uniyue nature of the project and the
applicant's property. The hardship must not be created by action(s) of the project owner(s). The granting of the
variance must be in harmony with the general intent of the regulations and not infringe upon the property rights of
others. The vaxiance requested must be the minimum possible to allow for the reasonable use of the applicant's
property. Should the applicant fail to demonstrate that any variance request is consistent with the criteria outlined in
the regulations, staff cannot recommend approvai of the application.
`�. COI'dTRAC'TOR INFORMATIOIV:
I, _ WILLiAM R. JANSEN/JACOB H. JANSEN , a certified contractor,
state that the dock has not been constructed and that it will be built in compliance with all requirements and
standards sez forth in the Pinellas County Code, and in accordance with the attached drawings which accurately
represent all the inforrnation required to be furnished. In the event that this dock is not built in accordance with the
permit or t�e informatio�fumished is not correct, I agree to either remove the dock or correct the deficiency.
�igned:
City:
CertNo.:C-3879: SCC13 1 1 50932
__'�,€�let�h�n� i�`u. 727 536-6786
State: FL Zip:33782
E-mailAddress: doc±csine r�r,ampabay.n�.com: iake a�ocksincor�orated.com: docicssal�s, ttamnab�v.!�.co�r�
VI. OWNER'S SIGNATURE:
I hereby apply for a permit to do the above work and state that the sam.e will be done according to the map or plan
attached hereto and made a part hereof, and agree to abide by the criteria of the Pinellas County Code for such
construction and, if said construcrion is within the corporate limits of a municipality, to first secure approval from
said municipality. I further state that said construction will be maintained in a safe condition at all t'vnes, should this
application be approved, that I am the legal owner of the upland from which I herein propose to construct ihe
improvements, and tbat the above stated agendcontractor may act as my representative. I understand that I, not
Pinellas County, am responsible for the accuracy of the information provided as part of this application and that it is
my responsibility to obtain any necessary permits and approvals applicable for tbe proposed activities on either
private or sovereign owned submerged land.
Owner's Signature
Date �'��t�f f1 �/
�
c'°°`°v �L _� � � �q A �1
• $ �Y, � "� �..,�-. � �..�. �_.. L �'�
n �.�%�Y � 'b k. �m�~ �'� e ���� �. L 1� ,a��d Y J' ., � ' �{�
a � FS Y
�
� `�
f ( / -' n ' . �..�' � '
/1 i/
�� � _ � � � , �,' i �/ �� I � (
/ YI f I' l
1!� L �1 �� _ '1 � �_ l _ � . I � ..+ � `
9;'.3'2v�Q���jyt I
t'�4Eti� r"! [V f� n°��'��' ' " � . .'- ,i
�. fj�tiS �a'"-0 ��.i� �'fa' � t'
.�` � '°� ° !�� 6 _ -� , � � ��'h���A� L�SE � �i_'t.
�4�.Yi ,ti J � i., S �' �r _ , _ i
�� �J ; � / � .A�
.+� ''t � ✓ rc-� `, \, ti J,
, � .. `.
� �
�
� ° `.� - � � �`�`' ;.k� ----- �.S ._
,- : 'r�� , 'f
'�16 � ��r � � �. _ �� � �
�,
' '�°c� ` r'� `� , A `�i '` `<�
- �!_.���TI._�•' C�_q°' (.p"e�
',� "�,'� L C, 1� � , . ;�o� � u �"
Q�l���t"� R Se[ ` ^`4 ,� �L._
'��=' �j7. ��� � �.
+m�,h - �7l Pril�i
r'�G. SC�iE. i ' =2G
�i
rc��.=,�. s�;u.� F�� r s�e�
',- � ,� - - , �r�ti� s` � :�xr ��.�i' z � i
�\ �\ � .: 4�' 4TERtv�11 ��'3D�d�{-C �g� r-
• / � ��, u; _ . _ __�o �V�ii�RFROlT`�'b�'3�ki �oC�_
/�� \ -� /7` ��' ,p4 t�' ��� —
.� � .
6�• � t ^An � , � �.G /� 4 E�B.1v �
L' I �Ib\ 0� a,J a p �,,
_' �iL_'� _' _' _.1� —�— -. �-�_ _' ' ' __ r{ — � � �°1 Yi�� "L � A°'C�a{ �-^h;' 6 Y°4
� n � _,, �j,� � � 9 �' �t�►�'►�t > Z °'f oa" f,,�,d Z'° k ��,
,-�_. ; , ���= - -
� i I �I - - -i� ��° c�� ��.���
' � � I . �� I ��,�� �..� ��, � s��,
i � i � ,� , ��,��� ��
� N ,r • c�. °�a��s.
I � I � �r— ;!�jl—[
I ,� ; ,
� 9.`���' ��',�"�-�
� �
i � y '� vt; �
..! �`° C '��,?,"_'� ��
I�
�� ; �-��-�����...���� �
,, � ,
�
� .�°d' �'����
i �
� `� .� ° I � y ' �'
sxoR
T��z undersi;�nrd does not ��hjo.:t to [h: m o,:d doc!: and re
�JC� � �jo(' /\ Lcft Uu r,�,
�i��natur�
��ru�i�ir,�:uh .�
Dt::e
�`�—�~ �G1La ° °`
I `�'• �° �L �%! •`f°e ��
' y 8 - , �� ►� k�c . �ec �
./ �O , �'` `' a�4'' °r,� . �G:tc.�s'�
����s �
'D'C� • �.�. "
e-� o
� U �a,�L_
; cariances a, drawn in th� sva:� pcnvided ab
_ Ri�h� O��ner �Mar��
�datcr and \a� iE;�tiou � pni'pc i i
Applicatiori # __
(OFFLCIAL U SE ONLY}
DISCLOSURE FORM
In order to alleviate any potential conflict of interest with Pinellas County staff, it is required that the County b�
provided with a listing of PERSONS being party to a trust, corporation, or partnership, as well as anyone who may
have beneficial interest Ln the application which wouid be affected by any decision rendered by the County (attach
additional sheets if necessary).
A. PROPERTY OWNERS:
Name : BILL MA,ZAS,
15� DE�ON DR
rLEA��.VJATEI? �L 33767-�,=�3�
B. REPF�ESEI�TTATIVES:
Name: DOCKS.INC. Name:
Address: 6634 92h'� AVE Address:
PINELLAS PARK. FL 33782
Name:
Address:
Name:
Address:
C. OTHER PER�OT�S HAVING OWNERSHIP INTEREST IN THE SUBJECT PROPERTY:
Interest is: �ontingent 0 absolute ❑
i�?a�ne: e N/A specific interest held:
L;. 1?0�5 a COI�TRACT �FOR SALE EXIST FOR THE SUB7ECT PROPERTY? YES '�;� NO�
if sc, �he contract is: contingent �� absolute ❑
I�Iame of parties to the contract:
E. DOES AN OPTION TO FURCHASE EXIST FOR TI� SUB3ECT PROPERTY? YES �' N
Name of parties to the option:
F. OWNER' S SIGNATURE:
I hereby certify that the information stated above is complete, accurate, and true to the best of mv�
knowledge.
��
X Date
��'�
I i '�
�
e ..:... ssa-.. �..�.e�=_N.�.s �.
a.
- - - __ _ __-�- �°
� � '3
3Q�i � o �
� q
°• � � 5 c,=t
., ... . . _ _._._�-�
;9
� ��
. `i �
� �
� ,
r,�
�
�
u
�
i---
1 '� €:
f-
�� i
�
� �'a,
� i�'��Y
I
� _
. =_�� C . _ .:
��!~P 1 �✓'=1 �
, —_._--___ _
'� ��������
'I � �:�
I,
i q�� �
� -�---�� ,fi-
I I i�� � �
I
1
,
� 6 �
�I � ( ��,...� _��.T._
� I I
�,��oi'I
�� � ,I ; C'
�f
�'�;_-
� , ,�
i� i, �; I �
��\l� ����I��V
i� �s
'1�
;��
�
�s'°"°'+w..:y.'�..c.t�.a���r..s. �. ...._�«�ti_...«,,,.o�..�-o.��J...���,.,.��.,,�.. =qa.��_ n.,�u..�. .,.s��,..�_ �
t�,� LL � C ' . �� \) � � .� � �
��� r�vo� n� �
� �" �
--_ �._w �4� _� __ _ _..
;.�� -'��
. �; �
B{I?i(;NTV�iiATg�� -- �� �
�. ����. ��, ��
� ° � - - �.. �
.� ��.� '; �
� � � ��
, ¢
� �.._ _ _ �._.�. _. _ =.v= _ ,_.__�.. =;,.�Ae
vy�� ��.._�.��_,� � _
x Q' � � �
� �i i.��.N � � .. - . . .
� tY.` a U� �' � 1J'` r j� ��`� 1��'' '
a a �
�.� ,., . SOl?7H �
",;� 5H(�;�� �
���� � I t '
° �
�
,, � :t
• ___._ _ _____ _-; --
— __ _ _ _ _— �----_ �� ------- - - i
� �
a V I: �
' �
� �
' �
�
�
{��
.�
���
� � �, �
-•_ —�.,_ _..- -- .. ._�w .—,�. r �-
.� ���� /��P ' __:�.,..._� �
i"'' �
�;'', G) %
''�^" � � '
� _ _ � '
�, ..._.... ._' II .. �
. _... ._ . _ . . _ .. . - ..._-. . .\.. . ._.' :,-_
—""."_"__..._.. _. . . _ � /�� 1 ,
� �,m _ r,: � �
�l� � !
/ � r ^w;
,��,R,� - _ ' �a ttl�,� � .,,.�� �
�c�������
r-ul� u�a� oF: f� �.� _ n�� s
�O�FlCE SUP�i.IE�
�FURWITU(iE ���„����
NEW, 11BEQ, �i�:�JlFec;�-;°< ;-{ :;l.l'��": c:v1� ��SlrP�l�L�
�EQ.UIPMENT 2000 Gulf-To-8ay-31vd.
�
�
�
�
�
- v - - ---r -- �
�.,.b.. � �� i
51,�.11o,J t,..� � �c �
�ma�u, ��,:� .F�,;�o�a�z-���,�.��s�� _�,
1�
https://www.google.com/maps/@27.9744074,-82.8249584,75m/d... 4/ 1/2015
V VV�1v lY1CL�JJ 1 G,�4 1 V1 1
1 S �. �tu� r, '�R,
�m.aqE�, - zoi s.<c�o��E. rnav oz�a N2r„ s c�c�;E �co �,
https://www.google.com/maps/@27.9746712,-82.8243355,150m/... 4/1 /2015
VARIANCE REQUEST' FOR1�I
�
� Application #
(C3FFlCIAL USE QNLY}
l.eft Lat Owner's Name �g,�r � i.�JG ��%° t n _ _-.
Mailing Address i 5 O '�'Ck UO !� '�,r� C ��at'Wa�C � FL. Zip 'S�''1 V7
i certify� that I am the owner of Lot (�_ which adjoins the propem� owned by the applicant who proposes to c�nstruct
a dock at the foltowing address:
�L�o� 'C��cUor� ��-� C�C t.�a�tt', _�L 3�'"t�'"j
I have seen the plans of the proposed structure{s) along with a��5� requested variances (see Section IV.B of the
application) and: DO OBJECT ❑ DO NOT OBJECT 0 to the proposed construction.
OWNER'S SIG�ATURE: /v ���-� Date S� 5 �
NOTA.RY:
STATE OF FLORIDA, PI'VELLAS COL:N`IY. BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, personally appeared
, weil known to me; or who provided a valid Florida Driver's License to
be the person who executed the foregoing instrument and that her"she acknowledged to me, under oath, that he/she
signed ihe same rreejy ar�d voIuntari(y for the purposes e�cpressed therein.
; =JI+RY PVS�� = HAYDEE VELEZ
. . z Notary Public - State of Florida
:N,:,"'1„` o;; My Comm. Expires Jan 31, 2017
,'�%�FOFF���� Commission # EE 870424
� day of /"��'"
A4y
r
20 ( j _
otary Public
/-� �l --1
Right Lot Owner's ?�ame �C' V � 1 � \Ar atw—_�,F"d T --- — — -------
Llailing Address ��':S T.no���� �ot.K� Q.i. f�x ( ��o�� i' � FC. Zip _"�.�i SCo
I certify that I am the owner of Lot l� which adjoins the propem� owned by the applicant who proposes fo construct
�t dc+ck at rhe f�liawing address:
t S� �tv�.�. 'D2. � � c,���,.�� �er- , FL 3'S'1 �'I
I have seen the plans ofthe proposed structure(s) along with any requested variances (see Section 1V.B af the
application} and: DO OBJECT ❑ DO NOT OBJECT � to the proposed construction.
OZ'V;�TER'S SIGNA'I'URE: Date
IVOTARY:
STATE OP FLORIDA, PT�iELLAS COtJNTl', BEFORE M1�IE, the undersigned authority, personaily appeared
.��eil known to me, or who provided a valid Florida Driver's License t�
be the person who executed the foreQaing instrument and that he,"she acknowledged to me, under oath, that hershe
signed the same freely and voluntarily for the purposes expressed therein.
Vditness mv hand and official seat this dav of'
Notary Public
�14y commission expires:
��
�'�� t� � ��,
I�it��'.:'I�,: i3(;(::-L''
:�1�3«`
�.��:
��l���l
���
b�-�-��
SS�4iet8�;1��
q�,���!'�• Ci�/�:�sO�lj.� �
;°�Jea``G E N s F�.. �/ '�,�, ( t l(
,� cr,- ,� ti. o �'
� 16313 �, p
� ;:
i<' c_ : �E��� � i-,� :.= sr. c f
�„ . +L � '��'t'��.il:� U�E'.'�. ��.ij.
-c'r ` � T �= lJ r ' :'1/ ,�
'� � `Y, s �- `�P` ��
`��`..;°� , 0 R •� t�.`� 3.5�
��' `� � O PJ AL Y: �:4-� _.___._. . � ..�.._ __.__—.,}'
t•�� � �� �
w� — , _ !—..j
,-_8.� s I` _`-7 _ '� �
�� � �
�
Pr��1�i��'•-"•� ' � �( � �
4 • ;� � �
r'�G. SC:�Lc: I., �� � t' ��� i �'
TO�a.L SQL�ARE FE�."I" SiBi
��_— r--- —� NE�'t�' SQL t1�RE F�EE'1' z z_7
• _., _ 1�'.�TfiR4VAi` W'ID7'H 9Gi4 �'"
� t r�..�: "-� .�_°:� =:
`� � _ �p' - jp` p ' r 20 4Y.�T�RFRO\T VS'IDTFi !�d �
� � 1
/ \ �� ��` ,o �3' 3
f �� . �����A� ; '.�3 GLA Lt�hi�ra<
+ �.1� ►� �,'t (.� �tnt 1-*+�. �. � v�s
�� 7 27� -- i � I
-- :i�-�— *--.t -�- - ---- - � -3{ ,� , ' F�►r►t : 2 .�� �a.� �►�.d Z'` 1c '
. �,_ _ �_ .C�� -, ��—� �s �
�F �-_..� .--.-, � -� ^� �,w. , y ° cc R �e�k.�
- ( Scc d � .�
i
i$3
, ! < < . ��f�l� ��c w ��r�, x �a.
� ; ,� , —' E�.,�.� � , i • t�. 'Ra1L�.
H
} f + ��^�T� �� � ��K.�C:•.S•. t..���• �.'t'. �r
i� � S �;� �yg.si kk�c. Sc�vx�
, �S•
�(� �s�4 S��,SS f 1 .� w• �� s.s. tiK,",S,
i � � � S=tJntS S
: �
� �— � .� .
� i { �,�
f " j ;
l
No
y30' 3y• lo �-r�' Doc,�=..._
S�OI2ELL'�E
T;�� itndersi,ned daet not ohic.:t to cne ro os:d doc': and re �_scz� �•ariance� a_ dra�vn in tht s a.;, rc,��ided ahove.
G1C�� �+C /1 Lcft U�nc. Ri�h: D.cner �(Y�Gi t
;i�!ztatua` ��,L-� �'. ��y�,1�L`,'�',:� ��T/oS b/.i
i�
�tiatcr and \a�•iE�don A�prn��al
V,aRiANCE REQL'EST FORi�'i
Application #
OFFiCiAL USE O(�LY
I,eft Lot 4wner's Name �� 0.2,G \ W �~ � � � ° C 'h __. —_.
�iailing Address j 50 ^1�C U� n"I� . �, �S41^Wo►kC._� F�. Zip 'S�'1 L,
I certify that I am the owner of Lot � ���hich ac�joins the properry owned by the applicant who proposes to construct
a dock at ti�e following address:
___LS.�, �c�on '�R-• �' �csr t.�kkt' �_�L. 33-t �'i
I have seen the plans of the proposed structure{s) along with any requested variances (see Section T� .B of the
application) and: DO �BJECT ❑ DO NOT OBJECT � to the proposed construction.
AWNER'S SIGIATURE: __ _ Date
Y(?TARY:
STAT� OF FLORIDA, PI�tELLA5 COLT75r'. BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority; personally appeared
, well known to me, or who provlded a valid Florida Driver's License to
be the person who executed the faregoing instrument and that he�`she acknowledged to rne, under oath, that he/she
signed ii�e same rreeiy and voluntarily for the purposes expressed therein.
Wimess my I�ai�d and official seal this day of
�;otary Public
My commission expires:
?0
Itight Lot t?wner's Name l.._�C' O � i�e�_ c" v__e.�,.,c rd �' __ _--.—
ivtailing �ddress ��S T��� floe.tCS, lU t�t ( ��q � f� FC. Zip 3 5r7 siv
I certify that I am the ow-ner of Lot l� �vhich adjoins the property owned by the applicant who propnses to construct
� �inr�k at the following address:
1 S � ��va,r� �2. C `t^t�w� �er' , �L. ���t i'f
I have seen the plans of the proposed structure(s) along «�ith anv requested variances (see Section 1�'.B oF the
applicationj and: DO OBJECT � DO NOT SJECT rC' to the proposed construction.
� �
QVV'�tER'S SIG tiATURE: ��� �,���� v____ Date _�' —/ 3' —/..3"________ _
�
NATARY: ��
STATE OF FLORIDA, PI'vELL.�S COU?�TY, BEFORE :�1E, the undersigned authorit; , personaily appeared
.«�ell kno«m io me, or who provided a valid Florida Drirer's License to
be the person who executed the foregoing insirument and that he,`she acknawled�ed to me; under oath, that he,'she
signed the same freely and voluntarily for the purposes expressed therein.
c
��'itnhss my t�and and of�'icial sea( this _� � ___ day ��f _ _ ,��_,� __�v_. ?0 . � �
�
• � �-� ' �
� � t �� ��`, `�
�`� �
ijx��•.,�r�_ �ctz
tiII3 ti�'
1IL�'�'
BO i 7"(3.' f
�����`�'��; �C LA�, S�Fie � �
���JC?\G�N.gE••,ti���� ���,�
'� � 3 '
.. 1 g3i � •
.�`. �� '
�ti �
,•� -� c� N.� . :z� iT. -
: r : W` tO�=FIClHI LISE C JLY`
'-c' Si�-� Or 'CU�
" ;� .`^ + \�P, �_`"' .
- ` � ' � � O (�i A'- �,� `�__ —_-- � 3. S . _ --------�r�
,
, :xe- i
ti
�. s_
�! � `j u ;� i .' � ,` I
r'�G- SC,�LE: 1" _� �
TUT.a.L SQUARE FE�.T 5��/
�'�� �`— �� h(E��t' SQL r1RE �''EE1' Z z'7
4-- •-=� ; - , , �F'.�T�R�T�'�Ll� �'ID�'ti �
.`:�,�, `:�.-��.,.:.�:s:; ,�«�'.
� � � -- 20 � – !0` o' r zo' ti�'•'•7LRFR0\T V4`IDTH �,
� 'i
/ l ` /�' �7� �o !3� � _ .
�I� k_. . '�•)�'�': �.5 cca Ls�e.�.d
�. - . -� tWd � �` •^ t�n; � `� ��t-�t �-r+�. �- � �'+
i�' 7� ��`
-- :�---- ---.r -�— _. y ��� � , � c� FQ�►Mt : 2 .,f �p.� �..d Z'' x y�•.
�t_ n_.. .-, ' . y p tc R�c+�►k dl
t_"" .�,--, ' � - - � � -
� � �_ __ ( i See.�etd w:4ti s 1���
� � ,
+ I j A n ��.s1�;,�� N� t• t.. 'Rot�S.
I
� 5:�
+ ��
I . � f
� �t��-� �1
;`SS '�
� 'tSt4 s��SS
� ��
� !/K,1(,i�•. =`•�l" �.'t'. al"
� y g. s' be.�*� • Secw�•�
I a w� t-'� S.S. S�c+�cw�.
�4��5 S
: ; 1'`-- � i ; j ` .�,�,�, � `�-_
i� � �.-.�.�'"
G�, 30' 3y• (o' Z-c.7' w�1 NoDoc.l�–
SIi�RELIi�E
7;,e undersi�ntd does not obja.:t ta the m os:.d doc;: and r� u_ste� ��ariances a_ drawn in th� s a.� pr<;e�ided abo«.
%1CNYPC !1 � L�ft,U� nc: . Ri�h; O�ti7ier �Qrla.A sCa� t
1
�i arcr and \a�•i¢�tion Appro��al
�
�•
i'
� .� f .. .
. . �'i �t . . + . . 3 . .. . . t ( . ; �
. . . ... . S . . , . . � , f . .. : j
� .. . ��` . . . . . � :-...
µ_ �
pBtv�_ ZE txX�c
fs.a. 4�v+uN v�.
/JhvvaG F�rs�,.�
� ��V� �^/'
�
�V�
smia.�
�,.sr Aa� ��
�Na SC.�I.E: � • �'to'
TOTALlDQ[.'ARi i�tT �'� �i �
�i6�V BQ�ARr ili6T �
w�r�aw�v vinm� _,,�
\/ -�• - n•�' e r v w�'r�cRt�t�1+�' wtbrri �G �► w_
p�
� � \` 1'IU Vie+�• � i '
i�pNar �a0 v�oe:t lcck►�
• ' 3
JM'•• � .�,lc. . .. . _..atci � 7 ,��ts � L 1 O' l � �'`� �
, �..�...�...N..
, `.
� + }u�e-'c+w
�( ' � .
{ i ! , 1
� -I�
„��, �� ��
'"'�"_-"-- - -
. .,+r ..r •�._
a�������C�V
�������s ���sNr�
�����
E
DECO Engineering Specs: DECO Aluminum - 2 Motor Lifts
Piling Mont to
bethrough
�-�-„ -- bolted with (2)
�° bo�ts
---- (4 or 6 � -
z�
Locations)
Min. Recommended Wire Size
100' ?00' 300' 400'
3/4-hp y�p #O6 N/A N/A
110v
3/4-hp ��, #10 #08 #O(,
330v
1-hp
#08 #O6 N/A N/A
Note: Structure is designed to wi and 125 mph winds�provided boats a�•e not i to�
stored on lifts du ' events. i„op #io #os #06 �oa
Bottom penetration to be in conformance with local regulations/codes and a minimum of 10' into the subsurface.
All structural components of DECO Lifts consist of 6061-T6 Marine Grade Aluminum, all fasteners and hardware are 304 Stainless Steel.
� o r-� n r, F G H
�;���'�' G�-�
��/��/�
Main Panel
Remote
1 10/310 Uni[ or
iFCI Breaker Switches
I
orzzn
Momr
Litt Capacity Upper Drive Cable Motors HP Motor Gea�•box Gear Belt Lower S anner Guide Bunk In. of P�l�n�
(lbs) Beams Shafts W�nders Cables Spread Voltage Pu(ley Pulley Ratio Size Beams pipes Posts Chocks Boards LifUMin. �Qty�
(TENV) Dia. Dia. Size
4" x 4" Box 1.5" 2�� %6" (2) %a NP 1.5" Alum
. Sch. 80 S.S. 78° 120V/13A 2" 10" 250 3��� a"aa" B�Xy" Sch 40 g��� Small- 2��Xg�� 48"/Min. �4�
4,000 %4�� Thick Sch. 40 to I Thick 10' � go 10' Lg. 8"
10' Galv. Alum. 1 Part 240V/7A 6� 2„
4° x 6" Box 1.5" 2" %6�� (2) % Hp _ 1.5" Alum Small or „ (4)
6,000 %" Thick Sch.40 Sch.80 S.S. 90" 120V/13A 2" 10" 2�� a��xb��Bo"y" Sch40 g��� Med.- 2 x10" 48"lMin. 8"-]0"
� to 1 37 T�»`kt�� 0 12 Lg.
12' Ga1v. Alum. I Part �'.40V/7A �� 2�� � g
4" x 6" Box 1.5" 2" %6' (2) %4 HP 1.�" Alum. Small or 2��x10° (4)
]0,000 %° Thick Sch. 40 Sch. 80 S.S. 114" 120V/13A 2" 10" to 0 37�� a^X6^ soa'/," Sch 40 g��� Med.- 24"/Min.
Thick 1_'' I2� I�g. g��-t���
14' Galv. Alum. 2 Pa�•t 440V/7A 9'2" 18°
4" x 8" Box 1.5" 2" %6° t?) %a Hp 1.5" Alum. Large-18° 2°x10" �4�
13,000 �" Sch. 40 Sch. 80 S.S. ; 300 42�� a'Xs" ao� Y° Sch 40 120" o�- 24° 14' L 24"/Min.
/4 Thick 114" 20V/13A Z•5" 12° Thick I_'6° 8"-10"
14' Galv. Alum. 2 Part 240V/7A to I 9�2�� g•
x ox 1.5" ' %6° r2) 1 HP a"xs°aox%," 1.5"Alum. � 4
16,000 %4"Thick Sch.80 Sch.80 S.S. 13g° <�V/13A 2.S' 12" �o� 42" Thick+%"x3" SCYIGO 120" Lazge-]8 3"x10" 24"/Min. ��
(1)FB-14' Or24 16�Lg 10 -�2°
16' Galv. Alum. 2 Part 240V/7A 11' 2"
a"Xs^sox 1.5�� 2�� �6�� (2) ] HP 300 4��xs'�soxY," 1.5" Alum. 120�� Large-18° 3"x]0° (�)
20,000 Y"Tn��k Sch.80 Sch.80 S.S. 138" 120V/13A 2•5° �Z� to 1 �2�� Thick+/a��X3�� Sch40
4 Pilin +�"X3° ��� (z) Fa-ts� 10' 6" or 24° 16� L� 16"/Min. � 2��
g Fs-�6� Galv. Alum. 3 Pv-t 240V/7A
x ox .� 2" /�" (2) 1 HP 300 a"Xa°aoX%" 1.�" Alum Large-18° 3"x10° O
20,000 ,�� � Z to 1 42" T�,;�k +%^.�° 4
6 Piling �� Thick Sch. 80 Sch. 80 S.S. 138" 120V/13A 2.5" Sch 40 120" or 24° 16' LQ. 16"/Min. � 2��
16' Galv. Alum. 3 Part 240V/7A ��� FB-�' 10' 6" �
ll�C:V Yower L�tt, IOCy IU41 ri9YDOY LaKC UI'.� J:IICIy naruur rL.�YO�_�
800-204-4178 www.decoboatlift.com
- �i
DE�O Engineering Specs: DECO Aluminure� - 4 Motor Lifts
r.��,;_. ,:.
__:}. . . . . s
� ���:__y.
�3���_____---
, --- , ; .�,.
�°�3�-
��'
��
��
�
�. �.
:.
.�, ����_=�.._
Min. Recammended Wire Size
100' 200' 300' 400'
1-hp #OB #O6 #04 N/A
220v
A B C D E F G H I
Motors HP Motor Gearbox Piling
Lift Capacity Upper Drive Cable Gear Belt Lower Spanner Guide Bunk In. of
Lbs. Beams Shafts Winders Cables Spread Voltage Pulley Pulley Ratio Size Beams Pipes Posts Chocks Boards Lift/Min. ��ty�
fTENUI Dia. Dia. Size
4" x 8" Bax 1.5" 2" 5/16" 4"xe" eox 1.5" Alum.
1/4" Thick Sch. 80 Sch. 80 S.S. 156" (4l 1 HP 2 5�� � 2�� 300 to 1 42" �5�� rhick Sch 40 120" Boat Boat �4" / Min. �S�
25,000 240V/7A -.75°xs°c�� Specific Specific 10"-12"
6'11" S.S. Alum. 2 Part FB - 16� �2'4"
4" x 8" Box �.5" 2" 5/16" s"xe" eox 1.5" Alum.
30,000 (411HP 25��rn�ok Boat Boat f8l
1/4" Thick Sch. 80 Sch. 80 S.S. 156" 240W7A 2.5'� � 2�� 300 to 1 42" _:75„X6„ �2� Sch. 40 120" Specific Specific 24" / Min. 10"-12"
6'11" S.S. Alum. 2 Part FB - 17� 12'4"
4" x 12" Box 1.5" 2" 5/16" e°X�2�� eox 1.5" Alum.
(4) 1 HP 25° rn��k Boat Boat 16" / Min. �8�
40,000 1/4" Thick Sch. 80 Sch. SO S.S. 168" 240V/7A 2.5 12" 300 ta 1 42" , 75.,xE,;��� Sch. 40 120" Specific Specific 10 -1.2"
B' S.S. Alum. 3 Part Fs _�3 13'4"
E
DECO 1'ower Lift, Inc., 7041 Harbor Lake Dr., Safety Harbo'r, FL 34G�5
800-204-4178 www.decoboatlift.com
,