The URL can be used to link to this page

FLD2015-02004� �l f� r ��N�� ' '..,-,'`�- -'��. r-x -�_' - � -� _'-_.;� ��,� f'_ .-_ __ , _ - _ '' _ _ MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: CASE: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT May 19, 2015 E.2. FLD2015-02004 REQUEST: Flexible Development approval to permit a 159-room overnight accommodation use in the Tourist (T) District with a lot area of 1.192 acres, a lot width of 280 feet, a front (south) setback of zero feet (to pavement) and 15 feet (to building), a front (north) setback of zero feet (to building and pavement), side (east) setback of 12 feet (to building), eight feet (to pavement) and three feet (to bicycle rack) and a side (west) setback of 12 feet (to building) and eight feet (to pavement), a building height of 100 feet and a minimum of 191 parking spaces at 1.2 parking spaces per hotel room, under the provisions of CDC Section 2-803.K; eliminate or reduce the required foundation plantings along the front (north and south) fa�ades of the proposed building as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of CDC Section 3-1202.G; and a two-year Development Order under the provisions of CDC Section 4-407. GENERAL DATA: Agent... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .. Applicant/ Owner... ........ Location ... ... ... ... . ......... .. Brian J. Aungst, Jr., Esq.; Macfarlane Ferguson McMullen. Elias and Anastasios Anastasopoulos; Captain Bligh's Landing, Inc. 630 South Gulfview Boulevard; a double frontage lot bound by S. Gulfview Boulevard on the south and Bayway Boulevard on the north approximately 240 feet east of the intersection of S. Gulfview Boulevard and Bayway Boulevard. Property Size .................... 1.192 acres Future Land Use Plan...... Resort Facilities High (RFH) Zoning ... .. . .. . .. . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . Special Area Plan ............. Adjacent Zoning.... NoYth South East. West. Existing Land Use ............. Proposed Land Use... ... . Tourist (T) District Beach by Design (South Beach/Clearwater Pass District) Tourist (T) District Tourist (T) District Tourist (T) District Tourist (T) District Outdoor Recreation/ Entertainment, and Retail Sales and Services Overnight Accommodations (159 units) with associated accessory/amenity uses including retail, restaurant, meeting space and exercise facility. ��iL�l 1'1'[iLl.l Level II Flexible Development Application Review �>.. "k�.�;:.€� u,�. . . . . . ANALYSIS: Location and Existing Conditions: The 1.192-acre subject property is a double frontage lot bound by South Gulfview Boulevard on the south and Bayway Boulevard on the north approximately 240 feet east of the intersection of South Gulfview Boulevard and Bayway Boulevard. The subject property is comprised of two parcels with a frontage of approximately 280 feet along South Gulfview Boulevard and 280 feet along Bayway Boulevard. The site is occupied by an outdoor recreation and entertainment use (miniature gol� and a retail sales service use. The property is within the Tourist (T) District and the Resort Facilities High (RFH) Future Land Use Plan (FLUP) classification. The subject property is also located within the South Beach/Clearwater Pass District of Beach by Design. The immediate area is characterized by a variety of uses including overnight accommodation, retail, outdoor recreation and entertainment, restaurant and attached dwelling uses with heights ranging from one to 15 stories. The City's Beach Walk project has been constructed transforming South Gulfview Boulevard to the west and north of this site into a winding beachside promenade with lush landscaping, artistic touches and clear views to Clearwater's award-winning beach and the water beyond. Site History: On November 20, 2014, the City Council approved the allocation of up to 100 units from the Hotel Density Reserve under Beach by Design (Case No. HDA2013-08007) and adopted a resolution to the same effect (Res. No. 14-36). The owners proposed to develop the site with a 159-unit overnight accommodations building with associated retail, restaurant and other like amenities are proposed totaling 15,092 square feet (just under 10 percent of the total floor area of the building). PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION _ �. � '--..__�._._. _.. ._--, ��_ � CLEARw � �� .4T,�R I�f1R80R �. �_._ � �^'`�-�` PROJECT ,. :---�_�_� _.. _ _, SITE °�� - �__, �_ _ �_._�,.r- �. �? - - -- � gp Wy A BIVD ,` � � � � -,�� ",--_ � �--, r CL�9R�� - - TF �p"9s'S LOCATION MAP �'LEf1RW,gT�.R �.,�tRBpR P 0 �"' ,�o � s � GG �'Ph b F H � ��< �, �o � T ° b � � N.T.S ...'wac o ' M � M111j �i •��r�a•�� .. � O ay � � : eA' /'Y� � q^' . '�'•., m �,� i � l'e�V `� 10� •.� � ,� � o � ••Y�� ,� � � ? � �� O � Mn � ^0 �0 �� ,h � �� Q'�5p�o � � aQ ^ � ZONING MAP �'LEqRy,A7,ER HAR80R � N.T.S ° o s� � `� t� ATTAC�ED °<,c, DWELLING GAS STATiON "•'••...� '°��;' �Q - -a ; h � �• y ' �r, ^ QAYh' ti •.�,� � � M� � gw qye�VO � ^$; y •:� , � o � ., w y � n° � O� ,^� � RETAIL. HOTEL/]1tOTEL � � A � w Q� ' b EXISTING SURROUNDING USES MAP Community Development Board - May 19, 2015 FLD2015-02004 - Page 1 . '_ Clearwater �evel II Flexible Development Application Review PL'wrr�rrG &°EV�LOPMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION u Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no active Code Compliance cases for the subject property. Development Proposal: The proposal is to demolish all structures on the site and redevelop the site with a 159-unit overnight accommodation use (134 rooms per acre, including the allocation of 100 rooms from the Hotel Density Reserve). The proposal will also include a variety of amenity/accessory uses such as a restaurant, retail, meeting space and exercise facility. The primary component of the application request is a height of 100 feet and setback reductions for a portion of the building along the north side of the site as well as for pavement along the north and south sides of the site along Gulfview and Bayway Boulevards. The proposal includes a tropical modern architecture, which is consistent with and complements the tropical vernacular envisioned in Beach by Design. Parking will be accommodated via structured parking (191 spaces minimum) within the first four floors of the building which will provide at least 1.2 spaces per room. Access to the parking (and the site) will be via three driveways with two located along Bayway Boulevard and one along South Gulfview Boulevard. All driveways will be one-way with the driveway at the northwest corner of the site along Bayway Boulevard and the driveway along South Gulfview Boulevard both being ingress-only. The driveway at the northeast corner of the site along Bayway Boulevard will be egress-only. The frst floor of the hotel building will include parking spaces, the hotel entry and lobby, approximately 13,000 square feet of retail uses and assorted back-of-house uses. The retail uses are all located along the south side of the building presenting a human-scaled, pedestrian-friendly retail frontage including an extensive use of patio/plaza space providing a seamless connection to the sidewalk along South Gulfview Boulevard. The second through fourth floors include only parking. The remainder of the building steps back on the north and south between 30 and 70 with the first four floors effectively becoming a base for the hotel component of the building. The effect is that of a four story building along the street with the bulk of the building setback from property lines between 30 and 70. The fifth floor includes a lobby, guest dining area, two small meeting rooms, assorted back-of-house support and office uses and hotel rooms. An outdoor patio area with landscaping makes up the balance of the fifth floor. The sixth through ninth floors are primarily dedicated to hotel rooms. An outdoor pool and patio area as well as a restaurant and gym are located on the 10�' floor. As noted, the proposal includes a certain amount of interior amenity space (workout room, restaurant, dining, retail and meeting space) which amounts to 15,092 square feet constituting just under 10 percent of the gross floor area of the hotel building. A solid waste component will be located in the northwest quadrant of the building and dumpsters will be rolled out to the staging area along Bayway Boulevard for servicing. The applicant anticipates the proposal will create approximately 100 new jobs. As mentioned, the site is proposed to be developed in a more urban manner in that while the building will be setback 15 feet from the front (south) property line along South Gulfview Boulevard paving will extend up to property line providing direct access to and seating areas for Community Development Board — May 19, 2015 FLD2015-02004 — Page 2 ; C�l��l 1I(iL��Level II Flexible Develo mentA lication Review PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT p pp DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION - � � �.��.� a series of storefronts and the hotel lobby. Landscape buffers 12 feet in width are provided along the east and west sides of the site. The landscape design incorporates plant material that is native and/or naturalized and salt tolerant while providing visual interest. Plant species include date palm, sabal palm, ligustrum, buttonwood, zamia and perennial peanut. Eight and five foot sidewalks exist along South Gulfview and Bayway Boulevards, respectively. These sidewalks continue to the east and west of the subject property. They will be repaired/replaced as needed and will match existing sidewalks with regard to width. Materials, fit, finish and installation methodology will be coordinated with City Staff. Bike racks are proposed along South Gulfview Boulevard. Brick pavers, stamped paving or some other like technique will be used where the sidewalk crosses a driveway however, the applicant has not determined the exact methodology to be used yet and will coordinate with Staff at time of building permit to finalize those details. The proposed site plan and elevations are consistent with those conceptual site plans and elevations as submitted to and approved by City Council as part of HDA2013-12007. The applicant is requesting a two-year development order due to market conditions. Section 4- 407 specifies that an application for a building permit must be submitted within one year of the date the CDB approves the project, unless otherwise specified under this approval. Special Area Plan: Beach bv Desi�n: South Beach/Clearwater Pass District: The City has demonstrated through the creation of Beach by Design and subsequent amendments to this plan that it recognizes the need for pedestrian-friendly development in order to create a vibrant active resort and waterfront destination serving tourists and locals alike. It is understood that a broad range of uses including retail sales and service, hotels and motels and restaurants contribute to the creation of the unique character and atmosphere that is Clearwater Beach. The vision of the South Beach/Clearwater Pass District of Beach by Design recognizes that this district is the primary "beachfront" destination on Clearwater Beach. This development would further the trend of quality redevelopment and/or improvements of properties along South Gulfview Boulevard within the area including the Harborview Grande, the Entrada and Shephard's with the provision of a hotel presenting a pedestrian-friendly farade along South Gulfview Boulevard consisting nearly entirely of lobby and commercial space and outdoor seating and dining opportunities. Beach bv DesiQn: Section VII. Desig,n Guidelines: Beach by Design provides that the implementation of the document involves more than community redevelopment initiatives, it also requries private development and redevelopment that conforms to design objectives and principles established in Beach by Design. These objectives and principles will help the City promote safety, encourage cleanliness, and provide a comfortable environment. It should be noted that any issue not addressed in the Design Guidelines shall be governed by the requirements of the CDC. Furthermore, the Design Guidelines are intended to be administered in a flexible manner to achieve the highest quality built environment for Clearwater Beach. Section A specifically addresses the issue of density. In short, Beach by Design supports an increase in density through Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) and/or allocation of units Community Development Board — May 19, 2015 FLD2015-02004 — Page 3 ' C��`�� Level II Flexible Development Application Review pL��G & DEV�LOrMExr . .. .. ,a,.,.�: . DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION from the Hotel Density Reserve. The proposal includes 159 overnight accommodation units including 100 units allocated from the Reserve. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this provision. Section B specifically addresses height and floor plate area and is delineated in three subsections. Section B.1 provides that a height of up to 150 feet may be permitted where additional density is allocated to the development either by TDRs, or via the Destination Resort Density Pool pursuant to the CRD designation, or via the Hotel Density Reserve where the subject property is located between South Gulfview Boulevard and the Gulf of Mexico or on the west side of Coronado Drive. Otherwise, height is governed by the specific Beach by Design district or, lacking such direction, the CDC. The proposal provides for a building 100 feet in height. Therefore, this criterion is not applicable to the proposal. Section B.2 requires that portions of any structures which exceed 100 feet axe spaced at least 100 feet apart. This section also includes overall separation requirements for structures over 100 feet in height as two options: (1) no more than two structures which exceed 100 feet within 500 feet; or (2) no more than four structures which exceed 100 feet within 800 feet. The proposal provides for a building which does not exceed 100 feet in height. Therefore, this criterion is not applicable to the proposal. Section B.3 provides that the floorplate of any portion of a building that exceeds 45 feet in height is limited as follows: a) Between 45 feet and 100 feet the floorplate will be no greater than 25,000 square feet except for parking structures open to the public; and b) Between 100 feet and 150 feet, the floorplate will be no greater than 10,000 square feet; and c) Deviations to the above floorplate requirements may be approved provided the mass and scale of the design creates a tiered effect and complies with the maximum building envelop allowance above 45 feet as described in Section C. 1.4 of the Design Guidelines. The floorplate between 45 feet and 100 feet is 23,070 square feet. The building does not contain a floorplate above 100 feet in height. Therefore, this section is supported by the proposal. Section C addresses issues relating to design, scale and building mass. These topics are quantified in six parts as follows: Section C.1 requires buildings with a footprint of greater than 5,000 square feet or a single dimension greater than 100 feet to be constructed so that no more than two of the three building dimensions in the vertical or horizontal planes are equal in length. The proposed building footprint is 41,404 square feet. The applicant has provided (Sheets A300 and 301) that no two building dimensions are equal in length. Therefore, this provision is supported by the proposal. Section C.2 requires no plane or elevation to continue uninterrupted for greater than 100 feet without an offset of more than five feet. No portion of any building fa�ade continues for more than 100 feet in length with the single longest fa�ade extending 100 feet (Sheet A100). Therefore, this provision is supported by the proposal. Community Development Board — May l 9, 2015 FLD2015-02004 — Page 4 ' C�L�� ►'1�1�1 Level II Flexible Development Application Review PLANNINC � DEV�LOrMErr�r _ :��. 7' . . .. . DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION Section C.3 requires at least 60 percent of any elevation (with elevation being defined as that portion of a building that is visible from a particular point outside the parcel proposed for development) to be covered with windows or architectural decoration. The application indicates compliance with this requirement using windows, balconies and architectural details including decorative grilles, stucco reveals and similar detailing on all facades. Coverage ranges between 61 and 74 percent of any given fa�ade (Sheet A600). Therefore, this provision is supported by the proposal. Section C.4 provides that no more than 60 percent of the theoretical maximum building envelope located above 45 feet will be occupied by a building. The applicant has demonstrated that the overall building mass between 45 and 100 feet constitutes approximately 29 percent of the theoretical maximum building envelope. Therefore, this provision is supported by the proposal. Section C. S requires that the height and mass of buildings will be correlated to: (1) the dimensional aspects of the parcel proposed for development and (2) adjacent public spaces such as streets and parks. The adjacent South Gulfview and Bayway Boulevards rights-of- way are 60 feet in width. The building along the effective rear of the property along Bayway Boulevard will essentially present a four story building between 13 and 17 feet from the edge of the roadway. Along South Gulfview Boulevard the building is nearly 30 feet from the edge of the roadway. The portion of the building above four floors is stepped back on the north and south sides between 30 and 70 feet. Therefore, this provision is supported by the proposal. Section C.6 permits buildings to be designed for a vertical or horizontal mix of permitted uses. The proposal includes overnight accommodations (with assorted accessory uses). Therefore, this provision is supported by the proposal. Section D addresses the issues of sidewalk widths, setbacks and stepbacks. These topics are quantified in three parts as follows: Section D.1 provides that the distances from structures to the edge of the right-of-way should be 15 feet along arterials, and 12 feet along local streets. While the prescribed distances are optimal, a 10 foot pedestrian path is seen as key to establishing a pedestrian-friendly place in the nonresidential environment. As such, building setbacks less than that as suggested are contemplated in that arcades may be constructed in the public space, but may not narrow the pedestrian path to less than 10 feet. In addition, decorative awnings and arcades and public balconies may extend into the public space and even into the right-of-way (provided they do not obstruct vehicular traffic). Outdoor cafe tables are also permitted in the public space, subject to the requirements in Section H, Sidewalks. The proposal provides a building setback of between zero and seven feet along Bayway Boulevard and 15 feet along South Gulfview Boulevard. A zero foot setback to pavement is also proposed along South Gulfview Boulevard. The zero foot setback to pavement along South Gulfview Boulevard will provide for a seamless connection between the sidewalk and the proposed series of storefronts and the lobby providing opportunities for outdoor seating and dining. The proposal includes maintaining the existing eight foot sidewalk along South Gulfview Boulevard and the five foot sidewalk along Bayway Boulevard. The sidewalk will Community Development Board — May 19, 2015 FLD2015-02004 — Page 5 ' C��Ll.l Level II Flexible Development Application Review pL.arrxm�G & naveLOrn�Nr - DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION `"� >:��.c �#, M..; ...,e be repaired and replaced as needed and will tie into and match the existing sidewalks to the east and west of the site with regard to size, fit, fnish and materials. Therefore, this Guideline is met by this proposal. Section D.2 provides that except for the side and rear setbacks set forth elsewhere in Beach by Design, no side or rear setback lines are recommended, except as may be required to comply with the City's Fire Code. The proposal includes side (east and west) setbacks of 12 (to building). Therefore, this Guideline is met by this proposal. Section D.3 addresses setbacks and stepbacks along Coronado and Hamden Drives. Buildings constructed with a front setback of 15 feet or more shall stepback with a minimum depth of 15 feet from the setback line at a height not more than 25 feet. The proposal is not located along Coronado or Hamden Drives. Therefore this guideline is not applicable to this proposal. Section E addresses issues of street-level facades and the incorporation of human-scale features into the facades of buildings in three parts. Section E.1 requires that at least 60 percent of the street level facades (the portion of the building within 12 feet of grade) of buildings used for nonresidential purposes which abut a public street or pedestrian access way, will include windows or doors that allow pedestrians to see into the building, or landscaped or hardscaped courtyard or plazas, where street level facades are set back at least 15 feet from the edge of the sidewalk and the area between the sidewalk and the facade is a landscaped or hardscaped courtyard or plaza. In addition parking structures should utilize architectural details and design elements such as false recessed windows, arches, planter boxes, metal grillwork, etc. instead of transparent alternatives. When a parking garage abuts a public road or other public place, it will be designed such that the function of the building is not readily apparent except at points of ingress and egress. The proposed buildings provide for a modern, streamlined building design with an extensive use of glass and balconies which mitigates the bulk of the building in addition to building stepbacks of approximately 50 feet along South Gulfview and Bayway Boulevards. In addition, nearly all of the fa�ade facing South Gulfview Boulevard is dedicated to retail storefront and the entrance into the hotel. The first four floors also contain the parking component of the proposal which will incorporate a screening system allows for air circulation while masking the cars within the building. The parking structure component of the hotel building will include the use of the same materials as the hotel building and will echo the pattern of balconies and openings of the hotel. Landscaping will also be placed along the north side of the building. Therefore, this Guideline is met by this proposal. Section E.2 provides that window coverings, and other opaque materials may cover no more than 10 percent of the area of any street-level window in a nonresidential building that fronts on a public right-of-way. While this is more of an operationally-related requirement, the applicant has committed to meet this provision. Therefore, this Guideline is met by this proposal. Section E.3 requires that building entrances should be aesthetically inviting and easily identified. The entrances to the buildings are generous in size, well-detailed and easily Community Development Board — May 19, 2015 FLD2015-02004 — Page 6 ' C�l.(�i�l ►'y{iL�l Level II Flexible Development Application Review FLANNING& DEVELOPMENT - DEVELOPMENT REV�W DIVISION °;��a °�„�_, ..,�. identified. Most of the south fa�ade is used as a series of entrances into commercial spaces or the entrance into the building. Therefore, this Guideline is met by this proposal. Section E.4 recommends the use of awnings and other structures that offer pedestrians cover from the elements especially at entryways. The proposal does not lend itself to over-street awnings however the entrance to the hotel is distinguished by a large overhang providing ample protection from the elements. Therefore, this Guideline is met by this proposal. Section F addresses issues related to parking areas. Parking is addressed via structured parking located on the first four floors of the proposed building and the entrances will be well-delineated. The hotel parking garage structure is integrated into the design of the building via the use of openings which mimic the pattern of windows and balconies of the hotel component. Therefore, this Guideline is met by this proposal. Section G addresses issues related to signage. A sign package has not been included with the submittal. Any proposed signage will be required to meet the requirements of this section of Beach by Design and any applicable portions of the Community Development Code. Section H addresses issues related to sidewalks (also addressed in part by Section D, above) and provides that all sidewalks along arterials and retail streets should be at least 10 feet in width. The proposal includes a sidewalk eight feet in width along South Gulfview Boulevard and five feet along Bayway Boulevard which will match the existing sidewalks to the east and west of the site. The sidewalks will tie into the existing sidewalks to the east and west matching the existing sidewalks with regard to width, fit, finish and materials. Therefore, this Guideline is met by this proposal. Section I addresses issues related to street furniture and bicycle racks. Benches, bike racks and trash cans are proposed along South Gulfview Boulevard. The applicant will coordinate with City Staff with regard to the placement and installation methodology for any street furniture which may be proposed within a public right-of-way at time of permit submittal. Therefore, this Guideline is met by this proposal. Section J addresses issues related to street lighting. Street lighting is not proposed with this development. Therefore, this section is not applicable to the proposal. Section K addresses issues related to fountains. Fountains and/or other water features are not proposed. Therefore this Guideline is not applicable to the proposal. Section L addresses issues related to materials and colors. Finish materials and building colors are required to reflect Florida or coastal vernacular themes. The proposed hotel building has a distinctive contemporary design that will make it an attractive landmark at this location. The building will be painted white accented by shades of light coastal blue. While the applicant may adjust the color scheme any such adjustment would require Staff review and approval and must meet the requirements of this portion of the Design Guidelines. The proposed color scheme and material schedule as submitted meets the requirements of this section. Comprehensive Plan: The proposal is supported by applicable various Goals, Objectives and/or Policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan as follows: Community Development Board — May 19, 2015 FLD20 ] 5-02004 — Page 7 � C1L�1 1'1'ttL41 Level II Flexible Develo ment A lication Review PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT P PP DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION — ��Ms: , Future Land Use Plan Element: Policy A.1.2.1 - The City shall require new or redeveloped overnight accommodations uses located within the City's coastal storm area to have a hurricane evacuation plan, approved by the City, for all guests. This plan shall require the commencement of evacuation of hotel guests as soon as a hurricane watch is posted for the City. A Hurricane Evacuation Plan will be submitted to and approved by the City prior to the issuance of any permits. Therefore, the proposal will support this Policy Goal A.5 - The city of Cleanvater shall identify and utilize a citywide Design structure comprised of a hierarchy of places and linkages. The citywide design structure will serve as a guide to development and land use decisions while protecting those elements that make the city uniquely Clearwater. Objective A.S.1— Establish the Hierarchy of Places as shown on Map A-14. Policy A. 5.1.1 - Identify Activity Centers: high intensity, high-density multi-use areas designated as appropriate for intensive growth and routinely provide service to a significant number of citizens of more than one county. Activity centers are proximate and accessible to interstate or major arterial roadways, and are composed of multiple destination points, landmarks and neighborhood centers and character features. The subject site is located within an Activity Center identified on Map A-14 in the FLUE of the City's Comprehensive Plan where the proposal includes a high-intensity, high density development. Therefore, the proposal will support this Goal, Objective and Policy. Objective A. S. S- Promote high quality design standards that support Clearwater's image and contribute to its identiry. The proposal includes the redevelopment of a lot currently used as outdoor recreation and entertainment and retail sales and service with a new 159-unit hotel with retail accessory uses along South Gulfview Boulevard. The proposal includes a new attractive building which meets the requirements of the Design Guidelines of Beach by Design, is supported by the vision of the South Beach/Clearwater Pass District and supports this Objective. Policy A.S.5.1 Development should be designed to maintain and support the existing or envisioned character of the neighborhood. As mentioned above, the proposal is consistent with the vision of Beach by Design, the South Beach/Clearwater Pass District and the Design Guidelines and supports this Policy. Objective A.6.1 - The redevelopment of blighted, substandard, inefficient andlor obsolete areas shall be a high priority and promoted through the implementation of redevelopment and special area plans, the construction of catalytic private projects, city investment, and continued emphasis on property maintenance standards. In adopting Beach by Design the City recognized that large portions of the Beach could be classified as blighted, substandard and suffering from "obsolescence and age". One of the goals of Beach by Design is to reverse this trend of disinvestment. This goal is well on the way to being met (perhaps even exceeded) in many areas of the Beach. The South Beach/Clearwater Pass District is one area that has not seen quite as much redevelopment activity as other districts. The proposed hotel should be seen as an important component in fulfilling the vision of the Community Development Board — May 19, 2015 FLD2015-02004 — Page 8 � C��L1�l��Level II Flexible Develo ment A lication Review PLnxxm'�&nEVELOrMExT P Pp DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION South Beach/Clearwater Pass District and one more step in the revitalization of the Beach and supports this Objective. Policy A.6.1.2 - Renewal of the beach tourist district shall be encouraged through the establishment of distinct districts within Clearwater Beach, the establishment of a limited density pool of additional hotel rooms to be used in specified geographic areas of Clearwater Beach, enhancement of public rights-of-way, the vacation of public rights-of-way when appropriate, transportation improvements, inter-beach and intra-beach transit, transfer of development rights and the use of design guidelines, pursuant to Beach by Design: A Preliminary Design for Clearwater Beach and Design Guidelines. As explored previously in this document, the site was the subject of an allocation of 100 hotel units from the Reserve which allows for a total of 159 hotel units. The redevelopment of this parcel with a hotel will play an important role in the renewal and revitalization of the Beach. Therefore, the proposal supports this Policy. Objective A.6.6 - Tourism is a substantial element of the City's economic base and as such the City shall continue to support the maintenance and enhancement of this important economic sector. Policy A.6.6.1 - The City supports and encourages the continued development and redevelopment of overnight accommodation uses. The proposed redevelopment includes an overnight accommodation use which will serve tourists and locals alike contributing to a vibrant successful resort destination and supports this Objective and Policy. Policy A.6.8.3 - Where appropriate, development shall provide a sense of pedestrian scale on streets through minimal front setbacks, similar building heights, street trees and proportionality of building heights to street widths. The proposal includes a new overnight accommodation use with a height of 100 feet. However, this height is mitigated in several ways: 1. The bulk of the building is setback between 30 and 70 feet from any front property line; 2. An active pedestrian area will be created along South Gulfview Boulevard with a building frontage dominated by a series of storefronts and the main entrance into the hotel; 3. The build-to line along all adjacent streets will match existing development in the area combined with the provision of active storefronts and the main hotel lobby along South Gulfview Boulevard complete with the provision of opportunities for outdoor seating and dining will all contribute to an active street life; and 4. A sidewalk eight feet in width will be located along South Gulfview Boulevard which will match the existing sidewalk to the east and west of the site. The overall effect of the proposal will pedestrian in scale consistent with the goals and vision of Beach by Design and the South Beach/Clearwater Pass District and supports this Policy. Community Development Code: The proposal is supported by the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code as follows: Section 1-103.B.1. Allowing property owners to enhance the value of their property through innovative and creative redevelopment. Community Development Board — May 19, 2015 FLD20 1 5-02004 — Page 9 ° Clear�ater Level II Flexible Develo ment A lication Review PLANNING & DEV�LOPMErrr P PP DEVELOPMENTREVIEWDIV[SION � ��;�� -,,::.. The property owner will redevelop the property with a new attractive building, a vibrant use (overnight accommodations with accessory retail amenities primaxily along South Gulfview Boulevard) and will contribute to the public space with landscaping and opportunities for outdoor seating and dining along South Gulfview Boulevard. The sidewalk along South Gulfview and Bayway Boulevards will match the existing sidewalks to the east and west of the site vis-a-vis width, materials, fit and finish. The development is considered innovative by the incorporation of units allocated from the Reserve and the provision of a series of storefronts along South Gulfview Boulevard. Therefore, the proposal supports this CDC Section. Section 1-103.B.2. Ensuring that development and redevelopment will not have a negative impact on the value of surrounding properties and wherever practicable promoting development and redevelopment which will enhance the value of surrounding properties. Surrounding properties are generally developed with a myriad of uses indicative of a tourist destination including overnight accommodations, retail sales and services, bars, nightclubs, outdoor recreation and entertainment, restaurants and attached dwellings. The proposed hotel will constitute an appropriate use for the neighborhood and is a targeted desired use within the South Beach/Clearwater Pass District of Beach by Design. Surrounding properties will be enhanced through the addition of uses which will contribute to an active and vibrant street life. Therefore, the proposal supports this CDC Section. Section 1-103.B.3. Strengthening the city's economy and increasing its tax base as a whole. The new hotel is expected to create approximately 100 new jobs and will positively contributing to the City's economy and its tax base. Therefore, the proposal supports this CDC Section. Section 1-103.D. It is the further purpose of this Development Code to make the beautification of the ciry a matter of the highest priority and to require that existing and future uses and structures in the city are attractive and well-maintained to the maximum extent permitted by law. The proposal includes a new attractive building characterized by a modern style and crisp, clean lines. In addition, this proposal provides landscaping along all sides of the site. The landscape design incorporates plant material that is native and/or naturalized and salt tolerant, while providing visual interest. Therefore, the proposal supports this CDC Section. Section 1-103.E. S. Preserve the natural resources and aesthetic character of the community for both the resident and tourist population consistent with the city's economic underpinnings. The proposal will support both the resident and tourist populations with an attractive new hotel with accessory retail opportunities along South Gulfview Boulevard. The proposal will be consistent with the desired form and function of the South Beach/Clearwater Pass District of Beach by Design and meets the Design Guidelines of that document. Therefore, the proposal supports this CDC Section. Section 2-801.1 Intent of the T District and RFHFLUP classification. The CDC provides that it is the intent of the T District that development be consistent with the Countywide Future Land Use Plan as required by state law. The uses and development potential of a parcel of land within the T District shall be determined by the standards found in this Development Code as well as the Countywide Future Land Use Designation of the property, including any acreage or floor area restrictions set forth in the Rules Concerning the Administration of the Countywide Future Land Use Plan, as amended from time to time. For those parcels within the T District that have an area within the boundaries of and governed by a Community Development Board — May 19, 2015 FLD2015-02004 — Page 10 ° Clearwater PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT Level II Flexible Development Application Review DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION special area plan approved by the city council and the countywide planning authority, m�imum development potential shall be as set forth for each classification of use and location in the approved plan. Section 2.3.3.4.6 of the Countywide Land Use Rules provides that the purpose of the RFH FLUP classification is to depict those areas of the County that are now developed, or appropriate to be developed, with high density residential and resort, tourist facility uses, and to recognize such areas as well-suited for the combination of residential and temporary lodging use consistent with their location, surrounding uses, transportation facilities and natural resource characteristics of such areas. The site is proposed to be developed with a hotel which is a use permitted by the RFH FLUP classification. Development Parameters: Density: Pursuant to the Countywide Future Land Use Plan and CDC Section 2-801.1, the maximum density for properties with a designation of Resort Facilities High is 50 overnight accommodation units per acre or 30 dwelling units per acre. On November 20, 2014, the City Council approved the allocation of up to 100 units from the Hotel Density Reserve under Beach by Design (Case No. HDA2013-08007) and adopted a resolution to the same effect (Res. No. 14-36). The proposal includes 159 hotel rooms consistent with HDA2013-08007. Impervious Surface Ratio (ISR� Pursuant to the Countywide Future Land Use Plan and CDC Section 2-801.1, the maximum allowable ISR is 0.95. The overall proposed ISR is 0.89, which is consistent with the Plan and this Code provision. Minimum Lot Area and Width: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-803, the minimum required lot area and width for Overnight Accommodations is between 10,000 and 20,000 square feet and between 100 and 150 feet, respectively. The subject property is 51,862 square feet in area and approximately 280 feet wide. The site is consistent with these Code provisions. Minimum Setbacks: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-803, the minimum required setbacks may be reduced to zero feet. The proposal includes a front (south) setback of zero feet (to pavement) and 15 feet (to building), a front (north) setback of zero feet (to building and pavement), side (east) setback of 12 feet (to building), eight feet (to pavement) and three feet (to bicycle rack) and a side (west) setback of 12 feet (to building) and eight feet (to pavement). The proposal is consistent with the setback requirements of CDC Table 2-803 for Overnight Accommodations. Maximum Building Height: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-803, the maximum permitted height for Overnight Accommodations is 100 feet. Please note that height is measured from the point from which minimum floor elevations in flood prone areas have been established by law to the highest finished roof surface in the case of a building with a flat roof. The proposed building height of 100 feet is consistent Community Development Board — May 19, 2015 FLD2015-02004 — Page 11 r C�LGLl 1'1'(iLl.l Level II Flexible Develo ment A lication Review PLANN[NG&DEVELOPMENT p pp DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIV[SION - ��G with the requirements of CDC Table 2-803 for Overnight Accommodations. It should be noted that this CDC section further provides that structures permanently affixed to the roof that accommodate rooftop occupancy shall only be permitted if within the maximum allowable height. This will limit the potential for rooftop activities and occupancy by guests of the hotel. Minimum Off-street Parkin�: Pursuant to Table 2-803 parking for Overnight Accommodations is 1.2 spaces per unit (191 spaces) where a minimum of 191 spaces are provided. The parking garage must comply with the Building Code and have a vertical clear height for all parking garage levels of not less than seven feet including the entrance and exit. This clear height includes any structural beams, fire sprinkler pipes and heads, electrical conduits and lighting, drainage pipes and any other building elements. The proposal is therefore consistent with the Code provisions of Article 2 Division 8 and Beach by Design. Mechanical E�,uipment: Pursuant to CDC Sections 3-201.D.1 and 3-903.I, all outside mechanical equipment must be screened so as not to be visible from public streets andlor abutting properties. Mechanical equipment will be located within the building and on rooftops and will be adequately screened from view from adjacent properties and rights-of-way by solid screening. This screening of the mechanical equipment will also be reviewed at time of the building permit submission. Si�ht Visibilit�gles: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-904.A, to minimize hazards at the intersection of streets and/or driveways, no structures or landscaping may be installed which will obstruct views at a level between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade within 20-foot sight visibility triangles. There is an ingress-only driveway proposed at the northwest corner of the site and an egress-only driveway proposed near the northeast corner of the site. While building structures will be located within these sight visibility triangles, such structures will not impair views due to the nature of the direction of vehicular flow. This proposal has been reviewed by the City's Traffic Engineering Department and been found to be acceptable. Landscaping located within the sight visibility triangles will need to be maintained to meet the Code requirements. Utilities: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-912, for development that does not involve a subdivision, all utilities including individual distribution lines must be installed underground unless such undergrounding is not practicable. There are no existing overhead utility lines, serving this development, within the rights-of-way adjacent to the site. All utilities that will serve the site will be placed underground. Landscapin� The applicant has opted to utilize the Comprehensive Landscape Program pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.G and as permitted pursuant to CDC Section 6-109.C.4. The criteria for a Comprehensive Landscape Program are provided below: 1. Architectural theme. a. The landscaping in a comprehensive landscape program shall be desi�ned as a part of the architectural theme of the principal buildin�s proposed or developed on the parcel pro osedfor development• or Community Development Board — May 19, 2015 FLD2015-02004 — Page 12 ' C��NI �r(4l��Level II Flexible Development Application Review PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT y ��,u�..; . . DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION b. The desiQn, character, location andlor materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive landscape program shall be demonstrablv more attractive than ZandscapinQ otherwise permitted on the arcel ro op sed for development under the minimum landscape standards. Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.D, there are no perimeter buffers required in the Tourist District for this site. This site does not meet the required minimum five-foot wide foundation planting along the north or south sides of the building. The site does include street tree plantings along both South Gulfview and Bayway Boulevards as well as shrub and groundcover plantings. Foundation plantings directly along the building are not practical given the urban design providing outdoor patio/plaza space along South Gulfview Boulevard and the use of storefronts along nearly the entire south fa�ade of the building. Landscape buffers 12 feet in width are along provided along the east and west sides of the site. The landscape design incorporates plant material that is native and/or naturalized and salt tolerant, while providing visual interest. Plant species include date palm, sabal palm, ligustrum, buttonwood, zamia and perennial peanut. While the site is deficient with regard to foundation plantings this is mitigated through the provision of a nearly completely transparent street level fa�ade along South Gulfview Boulevard. 2. Li�hting. Anv liQhtin�proposed as a part o a comprehensive landscape pro�ram is automaticallv controlled so that the lighting is turned offwhen the business is closed This criterion is not applicable to the subject site because the hotel does not close. However, the applicant will ensure that all lighting meets the requirements of CDC Article 3 Division 13. Outdoor Lighting. 3. Communitv character. The landscape treatment pro�osed in the comprehensive landscape pro�ram will enhance the communitv character o the Citv of Clearwater The additional landscaping proposed for site in combination with the building located close to the South Gulfview Boulevard right-of-way and the provision of patio/plaza space is expected to provide an attractive new development which will complement redevelopment efforts well underway throughout the Beach by Design planning area thereby enhancing the community character. 4. Propertv values. The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive landscape pro�ram will have a beneficial impact on the value of .�?ropertv in the immediate vicinitx o the parcel pro�osed or develo ment The proposed landscaping is consistent with the more urban development patterns in the area of the Beach by Design planning area which includes buildings, patios and plazas up to the right-of-way lines. S. Special area or scenic corridor plan The landscape treatment pronosed in the comprehensive landscape program is consistent with anv special area or scenic corridor Community Development Board — May 19, 2015 FLD2015-02004 — Page 13 ° Clearwater Level II Flexible Develo ment A lication Review PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT P PP DEVELOPMENT REVffiW DIVISION ' � ��; . � plan which the Citv of Clearwater has prepared and adopted �'or the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located. Perimeters buffers, as previously mentioned, are not required by the CDC in the T District except as otherwise required by Beach by Design. A specific landscape program has not been development for the planning area. The proposed landscape plan is appropriate given the desire for a more active pedestrian area along South Gulfview Boulevard. Solid Waste: A solid waste component will be located within the northwest quadrant of the building and dumpsters will be brought out to a staging area along Bayway Boulevard for servicing. The proposal has been found to be acceptable by the City's Solid Waste Department. Signa�e�. The proposal does not include a signage package at this time. All signage will be required to meet the applicable portions of the Community Development Code and the Design Guidelines of Beach by Design. Compliance with General Applicability Standards: The proposal supports the General Applicability requirements of this Code as follows: Section 3-914.A.1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The proposal includes a 159-unit hotel within a nine-story building. The proposed building includes a contemporary design that will make it an attractive landmark at this location. The subject site is surrounded by a myriad of uses indicative of a tourist destination including overnight accommodations, retail sales and services, bars, nightclubs, outdoor recreation and entertainment, restaurants and attached dwellings. The proposed hotel development will constitute an appropriate use for the neighborhood and is a targeted desired use within the South Beach/Clearwater Pass District of Beach by Design. The proposal includes an urban design which will place storefronts as well as the hotel lobby entrance directly along South Gulfview Boulevard and will complement and enhance surrounding properties. The immediate vicinity is typified by buildings between one and 15 floors. Therefore, the proposal supports this Code section. Section 3-914.A.2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The proposal is, as discussed in relation to CDC Section 3-914.A.1, above, consistent with the character of adjacent properties and with the intent and vision of Beach by Design, the South Beach/Clearwater Pass District and the Design Guidelines. The applicant has shown through substantial competent evidence that the proposal is similar in nature vis-a-vis form and function to adjacent and neaxby properties. The proposal will not impair the value of adjacent properties nor prevent or discourage their redevelopment. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section. Section 3-914.A.3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood. Community Development Board — May 19, 2015 FLD2015-02004 — Page 14 ° Clearwatex Level II Flexible Development Application Review PLa.xrr�rrG & navELOrMExT ... ... .::�r.. >�:. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION The proposal will likely have no effect, negative or otherwise, on the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section. Section 3-914.A.4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. The proposal has been designed to have a minimal effect on traffic congestion. Naturally, the development of a 159-unit hotel will increase the amount of traffic in the area. However, this expected increase in traffic has been mitigated with ample space for vehicle stacking on site and an adequate number of parking spaces onsite. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section. Section 3-914.A.5. The proposed development is consistent with the communiry character of the immediate vicinity. As previously discussed, the community character consists primarily of a variety of uses including attached dwellings, outdoor recreation and entertainment, retail sales and service, hotels and motels and restaurants within multi-story attached dwellings between one and 15 stories. The modern architectural style of the building combined with storefronts directly along South Gulfview Boulevard and attractive landscaping will complement and enhance adjacent properties. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section. Section 3-914.A.6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse visual and acoustic impacts on adjacent properties. This is accomplished by locating solid waste facilities within the building and by locating the outdoor pool and patio on the 9t" floor roof of the building and shielding this area from nearby residential uses to the east. There should be no olfactory impacts of any kind. The bulk of the building (the tower component) will be situated between at least 30 feet from any street right-of-way. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section. Compliance with Flexibility Criteria: The proposal supports the specific Overnight Accommodation criteria pursuant to CDC Section Z-803.K as follows: 1. With the exception of those properties located on Clearwater Beach, the parcel proposed for development shall front on but shall not involve direct access to a major arterial street unless no other means of access would be possible. The parcel proposed for development is located on Clearwater Beach therefore; this criterion is not strictly applicable to the application. 2. Height.• The increased height results in an improved site plan and/or improved design and appearance. The site is the recipient of 100 units from the Reserve. It is generally understood that a viable overnight accommodation project on the Beach requires additional density and, in turn certain amounts of flexibility with regard to setbacks, height and other development parameters. The requested increase in height to 100 feet is mitigated by building stepbacks of between 30 and 70 feet and is anticipated in this area of Beach by Design for buildings which meet the requirements of the Design Guidelines (which this project has been adjudged to have met as explored in detail elsewhere in this report) and which have acquired additional density through mechanisms such as the Reserve. In fact, one of the strategies of Beach by Community Development Board — May 19, 2015 FLD2015-02004 — Page 15 � C1L�1 1'1'[ilt�l Level II Flexible Develo ment A lication Review PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT p pp DEVELOPMENTREVIEWDIVISION � �J Design is to "optimize project densities" on the Beach. In short, the number of units directly affects the form of the building vis-a-vis height. In order to create a viable hotel with the number of proposed units the requested level of flexibility is needed. As such, the proposal is a reasonably expected design solution consistent with established and approved uses on adjacent properties and all applicable Design Guidelines of Beach by Design. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section. 3. Signs: No sign of any kind is designed or located so that any portion of the sign is more than six feet above the finished grade of the front lot line of the parcel proposed for development unless such signage is a part of an approved comprehensive sign program. A sign package has not been submitted yet although the applicant has committed to meeting the requirements of the CDC with regard to signage. 4. Front setback: a. The reduced setback shall contribute to a more active and dynamic street life; b. The reduced setback shall result in an improved site plan through the provision of a more efficient off-street parking area, and/or imp�oved building design and appearance; and c. The reduced setback will not result in a loss of landscaped area, as those areas being diminished by the setback reduction will be compensated for in other areas through a Comprehensive Landscape Plan. The proposed front setbacks of 15 feet to building along South Gulfview Boulevard are consistent with those as otherwise required as part of a Level I Flexible Standard Development review. The front setback reductions along the south are limited only to pavement which will provide a direct tie-in to the existing sidewalk along South Gulfview Boulevard contributing to an active and dynamic street life. The reductions setback along the north side of the property provide for adequate setbacks along the south side of the property and are consistent with other setbacks along Bayway Boulevard. While perimeter landscaping is not required landscape buffers five feet in width along the two front property lines are provided with the exception of a portion of the north property line. Landscaping in excess of the CDC is provided along east and west sides of the site. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section. S. Side and rear setbacks: a. The reduced setback does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emergency vehicles and/or personnel; b. The reduced setback results in an improved site plan through the provision of a more efficient off-street parking area, and/or improved building design and appearance; and c. The reduced setback will not result in a loss of landscaped area, as those areas being diminished by the setback reduction will be compensated for in other areas through a Comprehensive Landscape Plan. The provided side setback of 12 feet is consistent with that as otherwise required as part of a Level I Flexible Standard Development review. Therefore, this criterion is not strictly applicable to the application. 6. Off-street parking: a. The proposed development contains no more than 130 rooms; and b. The proposed development is within 1, 000 feet of an existing public parking garage with documented available capacity. Community Development Board — May 19, 2015 FLD2015-02004 — Page 16 ' C�l��! �Y�141 Level II Flexible DevelopmentApplication Review PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT - DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION .. . T.�,.-�'�° . .. The proposed 159-room hotel requires 191 parking spaces at 1.2 spaces per room where a minimum of 191 spaces are proposed. As such no request for a reduction in parking is included with the proposal. Therefore, this criterion is not strictly applicable to the application. 7. The design of all buildings shall comply with the Tourist District site and architectural design guidelines in Section 3-501, as applicable. As discussed in detail in this document, the proposal is fully compliant with all applicable portions of the Design Guidelines of Beach by Design. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section. 8. Lot area andlor width: The reduction shall not result in a building which is out of scale with existing buildings in the immediate vicinity. The subject property is 51,862 square feet in area and approximately 280 feet wide which exceeds the otherwise required lot area and width parameters. The proposal is consistent with these Code provisions. Therefore, this criterion is not strictly applicable to the application. 9. The parcel proposed for development shall, if located within the Coastal Storm A�ea, have a hurricane evacuation plan requiring the use close when a hurricane watch is posted; and The provision of a hurricane evacuation plan has been made a condition of approval of this application. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section. 10. A development agreement must be approved by the city council pursuant to F.S. �� 163.3221-163.3243 and Community Development Code Section 4-606 if the development proposal exceeds the base density and/or base F.A.R. established for the underlying Future Land Use designation. The development agreement shall.• a. Comply with all applicable requirements of the "Rules Concerning the Administration of the Countywide Future Land Use Plan" as they pertain to alternative density/intensity, and as amended from time to time; b. Be recorded with the clerk of the circuit court pursuant to F.S. ,� 163.3239, with a copy filed with the property appraiser's office, and a copy submitted to the PPC and CPA for receipt and filing within 14 days after recording; and c. Have its development limitations memorialized in a deed restriction, which shall be recorded in the Official Records of Pinellas County prior to the issuance of any building permit for the overnight accommodations use. On November 20, 2014, the City Council approved the allocation of up to 100 units from the Hotel Density Reserve under Beach by Design (Case No. HDA2013-08007) and adopted a resolution to the same effect (Res. No. 14-36) which included the approval of a development agreement. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section. 11. Accessory Uses: a. Accessory uses must be incidental, subordinate, and customarily accessory to overnight accommodations. Proposed accessory/amenity uses are limited to retail and restaurant space, an exercise room, meeting space and a pool and outdoor patio and are all considered as subordinate to and customary for accessory overnight accommodations. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section. Community Development Board — May 19, 2015 FLD2015-02004 — Page 17 ' C��1 �� Level II Flexible Development Application Review PL�1�`1G & DEVELOPMENT ° ...,, .. . . ... DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION b. The following shall apply to required parking for accessory uses: i. Accessory uses located within the building interior may occupy between 1 S percent and 20 percent of the gross floor area of the development, but only when additional parking is provided for that portion of the accessory uses which exceeds 1 S percent. The required amount of parking shall be calculated by using the minimum off-street parking development standard for the most intensive accessory use(s). Where there is a range of parking standards, the lowest number of spaces allowed shall be used to calculate the additional amount of off-street parking required for the project. In projects where the interior accessory uses exceed 20 percent of the building gross floor aYea, all interior accessory uses shall be considered additional primary uses for purposes of calculating development potential and parking requirements. The proposed accessory use area constitutes just under 10 percent of the gross floor area of the hotel. Therefore, this criterion is not strictly applicable to the application. ii. Regardless of the gross floor area percentage, overnight accommodations with fewer than SO rooms that have a full service restaurant shall comply with the parking standards for the restaurant use as contained in Table 2-803. The lowest number of spaces allowed shall be used to calculate the additional amount of off-street parking required for the restaurant. The proposal includes a hotel with more than 50 rooms. Therefore, this criterion is not strictly applicable to the application. c. In addition to the requirements above, for those projects that request additional rooms from the Hotel Density Reserve established in Beach by Design and whose interior accessory uses are between ten percent and 1 S percent of the gross floor area of the proposed building, density shall be calculated as follows: i. Calculate the maximum number of units allowed by the base density; ii. Calculate the maximum number of units that may be allocated fi°om the Hotel Density Reserve established in Beach by Design; iii. Add the figures determined in i. and ii. to determine the total number of units allowed for the site; iv. Divide the total number of units allowed, as calculated in iii., by the total land area to determine the resulting units per acre for the project site; v. Determine the total floor area of all interior accessory uses exceeding ten percent of the gross floor area of the proposed building; vi. Subtract the figure determined in v. from the total land area, and divide this difference by 43,560 to determine the net acreage; vii. Multiply the net acreage derived in vi. by the applicable resulting units per acre figure determined in iv. The resulting product is the maximum number of rooms allowable for the project. viii. The final allocation of rooms fi°om the Hotel Density Reserve shall be determined by multiplying the net acreage determined in vi. by the base density and subtracting this product from the maximum number of rooms allowable for the project as determined in vii. Community Development Board — May 19, 2015 FLD2015-02004 — Page 18 � C1L�1 1'1'N�LI�I Level II Flexible Develo mentA lication Review PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT P pp DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION � :;�...�s:�� The proposed accessory use area constitutes just under 10 percent of the gross floor area of the hotel. Therefore, this criterion is not strictly applicable to the application. d. Signage for any accessory use shall be subordinate to and incorporated into the primary freestanding signage for the overnight accommodation use. In no case shall more than 25 percent of the sign area be dedicated to the accessory uses. A sign package has not been submitted yet although the applicant has committed to meeting the requirements of the CDC with regard to signage. e. Those developments that have obtained additional density from the Destination Resort Density Pool established in Beach by Design are not subject to the requirements set forth in Sections 2-803.I.11. a—d. The proposal includes units obtained through the Reserve. Therefore, this criterion is not strictly applicable to the application. Section 4-206.D.4: Burden of proof. The burden of proof is upon the applicant to show by substantial competent evidence that he is entitled to the approval requested. The applicant has adequately demonstrated through the submittal of substantial competent evidence that the request is entitled to the approval requested as required by CDC Section 4- 206.D.4. Compliance with Standards and Criteria: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the standards as per CDC Tables 2-801.1 and 2-803: Standard Proposed Consistent� Inconsistent Density 50 overnight 159 overnight accommodation units. X accommodation units per acre (80 units) plus 100 units from the Reserve (159 units total) Impervious Surface Ratio 0.95 0.89 X Minimum Lot Area 10,000 to 20,000 sf 51,862 sf X Minimum Lot Width 100 - 150 feet 286 feet X Minimum Setbacks Front: 0- 15 feet North: Zero feet (to building/paving) X 15 feet (to building) South: Zero feet (to paving) Side: 0-10 feet East: 12 feet (to building) X 8 feet (to paving) West: 12 feet (to building) X 8 feet (to paving) 3 feet (to bicycle rack) Maximum Height 35 - 100 feet 100 feet X Minimum 1- 1.2 spaces per unit 191 spaces (1.2 spaces per unit) X Off-Street Parkin 159 - 191 s aces � See analysis in Staff Report Community Development Board — May 19, 2015 FLD2015-02004 — Page 19 ' C��l ►'1i�L�l Level II Flexible Development Application Review PL'�rr�rrG&DEV�LOPi''¢NT - DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION . . w. �.�`<.�: ,,-:, . . Compliance with Flexibility Criteria: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per CDC Section 2-803.K (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project): Consistentl � Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from X the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of X the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly X development and improvement of surrounding properties. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed X development. 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use X category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street X parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: ❑ Changes in horizontal building planes; ❑ Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; ❑ Variety in materials, colors and textures; ❑ Distinctive fenestration patterns; ❑ Building stepbacks; and ❑ Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and annronriate distances between buildines. See analysis in Sta„�'Report Community Development Board — May 19, 2015 FLD2015-02004 — Page 20 ° Clearwatex Level II Flexible Development Application Review . . .,". �' �t� �`:=`, . .. . . . _ .. PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION Compliance with General Applicability Standards: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards for Level One and Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3-914.A: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties � See analysis in Staff Report Consistentl I Inconsistent X X X X X X Compliance with Comprehensive Landscape Program Standards: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Comprehensive Landscape Program as per CDC Section 3-1202.G: 1. Architectural theme. a. The landscaping in a comprehensive landscape program shall be designed as a part of the architectural theme of the principal buildings proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for development; or b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive landscape program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape standards 2. Lighting. Any lighting proposed as a part of a comprehensive landscape program is automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the business is closed. 3. Communiry character. The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive landscape program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater. 4. Properry values. The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive landscape program will have a beneficial impact on the value of property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 5. Special area or scenic corridor plan. The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive landscape program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located � See analysis rn Staff Report Community Development Board — May 19, 2015 FLD2015-02004 — Page 21 Consistentl � Inconsistent X X X X X ' 1��1.R� �1'(4L�� Level II Flexible Development Application Review . . .... �a a��".'<. � . Compliance with Beach by Design Design Guidelines: i. Section A: Density. 2. Section B: Height. 3. Section C: Design, Scale and Mass of Buildings. 4. Section D: Setbacks. 5. Section: Street-Level Fa�ades. 6. Section F: Parking Areas. 7. Section G: Signage. 8. Section H: Sidewalks. 9. Section I: Street Furniture and Bicycle Racks. 10. Section J: Street Lighting. 11. Section K: Fountains. 12. Section L: Materials and Colors. t See analysis in Sta„{f Report PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION Consistentl � Inconsistent X X X X X X N/A X X N/A N/A X SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meeting of March 5, 2015, and deemed the development proposal to be legally sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: Findings of Fact: The Planning and Development Department, having reviewed all evidence submitted by the applicant and requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact: 1. The 1.192-acre site is a double frontage lot bound by South Gulfview Boulevard on the south and Bayway Boulevard on the north approximately 240 feet east of the intersection of South Gulfview Boulevard and Bayway Boulevard; 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 9. 10. On November 20, 2014, the City Council approved the allocation of up to 100 units from the Hotel Density Reserve under Beach by Design (Case No. HDA2013-08007) and adopted a resolution to the same effect (Res. No. 14-36); The property is currently occupied by the an outdoor recreation/entertainment and retail sales and service use; That the subject property is located within the Tourist (T) District and the corresponding Resort Facilities High (RFH) Future Land Use Plan category; That the subject property is located in the South Beach/Clearwater Pass District of Beach by Design; The subject property is comprised of two parcels with approximately 280 feet of frontage along South Gulfview Boulevard and 280 feet along Bayway Boulevard; The proposal is to construct a new hotel building on the property consisting of 159 overnight accommodation units; The proposal includes a minimum of 191 parking spaces where 191 spaces are required; The proposed hotel height is 100 feet; The proposal includes a front (south) setback of zero feet (to pavement) and 15 feet (to building), a front (north) setback of zero feet (to building and pavement), side (east) setback Community Development Board — May l 9, 2015 FLD2015-02004 — Page 22 � Clearwater Level II Flexible Development Application Review PLANNING & DEV�LOeMErrr ..��„� ,u : DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION of 12 feet (to building), eight feet (to pavement) and three feet (to bicycle rack) and a side (west) setback of 12 feet (to building) and eight feet (to pavement); 11. That the proposal is fully in compliance with all applicable portions of the Beach by Design guidelines; and 12. There are no active Code Compliance cases for the subject property. Conclusions of Law: The Planning and Development Department, having made the above findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards pursuant to CDC Tables 2- 801.1 and 2-803; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria pursuant to CDC Section 2-803.K; 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level One and Two Approvals pursuant to CDC Section 3-914.A; 4. That the development is consistent with the General Purposes of the CDC pursuant to CDC Section 1-103; 5. That the development is consistent with applicable components of the City's Comprehensive Plan; 6. That the application is consistent with the requirement for the submittal of substantial competent evidence pursuant to CDC Section 4-206.D.4; 7. That the development is consistent with the South Beach/Clearwater Pass District of Beach by Design; and 8. That the development proposal is consistent with the Design Guidelines of Beach by Design. Based upon the above, the Planning and Development Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development application to permit a 159-room overnight accommodation use in the Tourist (T) District with a lot area of 1.192 acres, a lot width of 280 feet, a front (south) setback of zero feet (to pavement) and 15 feet (to building), a front (north) setback of zero feet (to building and pavement), side (east) setback of 12 feet (to building), eight feet (to pavement) and three feet (to bicycle rack) and a side (west) setback of 12 feet (to building) and eight feet (to pavement), a building height of 100 feet and a minimum of 191 parking spaces at 1.2 parking spaces per hotel room, under the provisions of CDC Section 2-803.K; eliminate or reduce the required foundation plantings along the front (north and south) fa�ades of the proposed building as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of CDC Section 3-1202.G; and a two-year Development Order under the provisions of CDC Section 4-407 subject to the following conditions: Conditions of Approval: General/Miscellaneous Conditions 1. That all irrigation systems be connected to the City reclaimed water system where available per Clearwater Code of Ordinances, Article IX., Reclaimed Water System, Section 32.376. Reclaimed water lines are available in the South Gulfview Boulevard right-of-way; 2. That application for a building permit be submitted no later than May 19, 2017, unless time extensions are granted pursuant to CDC Section 4-407; Community Development Board — May 19, 2015 FLD20 ] 5-02004 — Page 23 � CiLµj �1'�L�l Level II Flexible DevelopmentApplication Review PL^r�rrn�rG&DEV�LOrMExr DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION Timin� Conditions - Prior to Issuance of Permit 3. That, prior to the issuance of any building permits, except for site work, demolition, clearing and grubbing or the provision of fill, plans which show that all parking spaces are designed in accordance with the CDC are submitted to and approved by City Staff; 4. That, prior to the issuance of any building permits, except for site work, demolition, clearing and grubbing or the provision of fill, plans which demonstrate through the use of a turning template that an AASHTO standard passenger vehicle can maneuver throughout the parking garage without encroaching onto opposing lanes or hitting objects is submitted to and approved by City Staff; 5. That, prior to the issuance of any building permits, except for demolition, clearing and grubbing or the provision of fill, a plan which shows that all on-street parking spaces within any sight visibility triangles are removed is submitted to and approved by City Staff; 6. That, prior to the issuance of any building permits except for demolition, clearing and grubbing or the provision of fill, a site plan which indicates that where sidewalks cross driveways treatments such as pavers or stamped paving are used and that the details of that treatment including but not limited to pattern, type and installation methodology be approved by Staff; 7. That, prior to the issuance of any building permits, except for site work, demolition, clearing and grubbing or the provision of fill, the location and visibility of electric equipment (electric panels, boxes and meters) be reviewed and, if located exterior to the building where visible from any street frontage, be shown to be painted the same color as the portion of the building to which such features are attached; 8. That, prior to the issuance of any building permits, except for site work, demolition, clearing and grubbing or the provision of fill, any applicable Parks and Recreation impact fees be paid; 9. That, prior to the issuance of any building permits, except for demolition, clearing and grubbing or the provision of fill, the Fire Department may require the provision of a Water Study performed by a Fire Protection Engineer in order to ensure that an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of the project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required, then the water supply must be able to supply 150 percent of its rated capacity; 10. That, prior to the issuance of any building permits, except for demolition, clearing and grubbing or the provision of fill, all sub-standard sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project shall be shown on plans to be improved to meet the requirement of Local, State and/or Federal standards including A.D.A. requirements (truncated domes per FDOT Index #304); 11. That, prior to the issuance of any building permits, except for demolition, clearing and grubbing or the provision of fill, a site plan, accompanied by a stormwater vault maintenance schedule, signed and accepted by the owner, which provides stormwater vault specifications indicating that the vault provides water quality benefits is submitted to and approved by City Staff; 12. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, except for demolition, clearing and grubbing or the provision of fill, a grading and drainage plan is submitted to City staff which provides acceptable levels of stormwater attenuation and meets water quality standards; Community Development Board — May 19, 2015 FLD2015-02004 — Page 24 :��.(l��(�tL�l Level II Flexible Development Application Review _ .v�.?�5 S.".,..„..:,. . . PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION 13. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, except for demolition, clearing and grubbing or the provision of fill, the fit, finish, materials, installation methodology of the sidewalk and any associated sidewalk amenities (such as benches, trash receptacles, trees, lighting), as the case may be, be coordinated with and approved by City Staff; 14. That prior to the issuance of any permits a Hurricane Evacuation Plan be submitted to and approved by the City; Timin� Conditions - Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occubancy 15. That, prior to the issuance of a Certiiicate of Occupancy, sidewalks and any associated sidewalk amenities be installed to the satisfaction of City Staff along South Gulfview and Bayway Boulevards; and 16. That, prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, all service lines onto the property shall be installed underground. ,� Prepared by Planning and Development Department Staf£ i`� ...._ _ _ _ _ _ � Mark T. Parry, AICP, Planner III ATTACHMENTS: Photographs Community Development Board — May 19, 2015 FLD2015-02004 — Page 25 �� ;�� r , �I�II ..�. ,.id � 4 'i r^ .�. ! �g � �r��Tlqr�`� �.`;,� i �n , ; d� Y � s �3, .x 3��' s,. Looking northeast along South Gulfview. � � � x. �.i:-. �� :� Iq � y � #�'��I � I� I� Hpt �� r I ti 1 Looking north from South Gulfview. �x�. ,,. � ; Looking northwest along South Gulfview. `�' `� �a,m Looking south from Bayway. . . - - . x � � � � t�=�<;. ' - . . � '� r�...` � . J,7 1 �. � s C1` : � i r's�' +'�, ' Y• L ix af�� E,i :iF,� ^" ,iC �d;1 �44, �y�`"r � Looking southeast from Bayway. Looking southwest from Bayway. 630 South Gulfview Boulevard FLD2015-02004 MARK T. PARRY 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Tel: (727) 562.4741 Clearwater, FL 33756 E-mail: mark.parry@myclearwater.com SUMMARY OF QUALIFICATIONS A dedicated, AICP certified professional Planner focused on contributing to the field of Urban Planning experienced in public and private sector planning. An excellent communicator, able to effectively interact with clients, local government officials and business professionals at all levels. Experienced in various aspects of urban design and planning, zoning regulations and permitting. OBJECTIVE To secure a Planning position which will allow me to continue improving the built environment and my community through sound and innovative planning and design principals. EDUCATION COOK COLLEGE, RUTGERS UNIVERSITY, New Brunswick, NJ B.S. Landscape Architecture Major, Urban Planning Certification B.S. Environmental Planning and Design Certificate Urban Planning Golden Key National Honor Society; Sigma Lambda A/pha American Planning Association (Florida Chapter); member AICP #020597 40-hour OSHA (Hazwoper) Training PLANNER III PLANNING DEPARTMENT, CITY OF CLEARWATER 04/12 - Present 08/98 — 04/05 • Responsible for nonresidential and single/multi-family site plan review and permitting. • Assist in the implementation and subsequent review of the Community Development Code. . Responsible for assessing and writing Communiry Development Code amendments. • Land Development Code development, interpretation and application. • Provide, inspect and direct landscape review/design. • Acting Development Review Manager 9/99 — 11/99 and 01/05 — 03/05. • Manage and direct Associate Planners. • Review, process and present variance/conditional use, land use/zoning atlas amendment and annexation applications at in-house and public review meetings. • Principal Planner in creating and implementing Clearwater's Downtown Design Guidelines. Assisted in the implementation and application of the Clearwater powntown Redevelopment Plan. SENIOR PLANNER DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, CARDNO TBE 04/05 — 04/12 � Planner of record for Cities of Indian Rocks Beach, Seminole and Clearwater and Town of Belleair. • Responsible for nonresidential and single/multi-family site plan review and permitting. • Perform site design and inspections. • Provide technical planning support for engineering department. • Provide support for Zoning Code, Comprehensive Plan, Zoning and Land Use Plan amendments. • Research and write Evaluation and Appraisal Reports. • Create and update Special Area Plans/Form-based Codes. • Provide CADD support. • Assist with creating redevelopment marketing material. • Perform technical environmental services including soil and groundwater sampling. Designer/Owner GREENSCAPES-GLD, MARLBORO, NJ • Founded and established a local garden and Iandscape business. • Plan and oversee installation of commercial and residential landscaping and photo-manipulation programs. • Develop and implement advertising programs, brochures and graphics. • Estimate, bid and negotiate jobs. • Source and negotiate purchase of materials and equipment. • Manage, train and schedule installation crews. 9/92 - 6/98 projects utilizing a variety of CADD Program Supervisor LONGSTREET FARM, MONMOUTH COUNTY PARK SYSTEM, HOLMDEL, NJ • Assisted in formulating and running children's summer program ("Hayseed"). • Created and coordinated daily programs and schedules for 6-9 year old groups. • Supervised several other programs throughout the year. • Created a demand which was twice the program's capacity after the first year. COMPUTER SKILLS 6/87 - 8/93 Access, Microsoft Office, Microsoft Works, ClarisWorks, MS Word, Land Designer Pro, Permit Plan, Excel, Cornerstone, AutoCADD, PowerPoint, Publisher � ° learwater � V � Planning & Development Department Flexible Development Application Attached Dwellings, Mixed-Uses or Non-Residential Uses IT IS INCUMBENT UPON THE APPLICANT TO SUBMIT COMPLETE AND CORRECT INFORMATION. ANY MISLEADING, DECEPTIVE, INCOMPLETE OR INCORRECT INFORMATION MAY INVALIDATE YOUR APPLICATION. ALL APPLICATIONS ARE TO BE FILLED OUT COMPLETELY AND CORRECTLY, AND SUBMITTED IN PERSON (NO fAX OR DELIVERIES) TO THE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY NOON ON THE SCHEDULED DEADLINE DATE. A TOTAL OF 11 COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS AND APPLICATION MATERIALS (1 ORIGINAL AND 10 COPIES) AS REQUIRED WITHIN ARE TO BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW BY THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE. SUBSEQUENT SUBMITTAL FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD WILL REQUIRE 15 COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS AND APPLICATION MATERIALS (1 ORIGINAL AND 14 COPIES). PLANS AND APPLICATIONS ARE REQUIRED TO BE COLLATED, STAPLED AND FOLDED INTO SETS. THE APPLICANT, BY FILING THIS APPLICATION, AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE. FIRE DEPT PRELIMARY SITE PLAN REVIEW FEE: $ZOO APPLICATION FEE: $1,ZO5 PROPERTY OWNER (PER DEED): Captain Bligh's Landinq, Inc., Elias Anastasopoulos and Anastasios Anastasopoulos MAILING ADDRESS: 630 S. Gulfview Blvd., Clearwater, FL 33767 PHONE NUMBER: 727-461-9300 EMAIL: N/A AGENT OR REPRESENTATIVE: Brian J. Aungst, Jr. (Macfarlane Ferguson & McMullen, P.A.) and Roland Rogers MAILING ADDRESS: 625 Court Street, Clearwater, FL 33756 630 S. Gulfview Blvd., Clearwater, FL 33767 PHONE NUMBER: �2�-441-8966 (727) 686-3099 EMAIL: BJA@macfar.com rjrogers16@aol.com ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: 630 S. GUlfvieW BIVd. PARCEL NUMBER(S): 17-29-15-05004-002-0020 17-29-15-0 5004-002-0230 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See survey PROPOSED u5E(S): Overnight Accommodation Use (Hotel with a total of 159 rooms) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: See Narrative Specifically identify the request (include all requested code flexibility; e.g., reduction in required number of parking spaces, height, setbacks, lot size, lot width, specific use, etc.): Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 1 of 8 Revised 01/12 ° learwater �C � Planning & Development Department Flexible Development Application Data Sheet PLEASE ENSURE THAT THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS FILLED OUT, IN ITS ENTIRETY. FAILURE TO COMPLETE THIS FORM WILL RESULT IN YOUR APPLICATION BEING FOUND INCOMPLETE AND POSSIBLY DEFERRED UNTIL THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION CYCLE. ZONING DISTRICT: FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATION: Tourist (Tl Resort Facility High (RFH) ex�ST�ruG uSE (currently existing on site): Outdoor Recreation & Entertainment Use (miniature golf) & Retail Sales PROPOSED USE (new use, if any; plus existing, if to remain): Overni�ht Accommodation Use (Hotel) SITE AREA: 51,862 sq. ft. GROSS FLOOR AREA (total square footage of all buildings): Existing: g,559 sq. ft. Proposed: 151,449 sq. ft. Maximum Allowable: 51,862 sq. ft. 1.192 acres GROSS FLOOR AREA (total square footage devoted to each use, if there will be multiple uses): Firstuse: 151,449 sq.ft. Second use: Third use: sq. ft. sq. ft. FLOOR AREA RATIO (total square footage of all buildings divided by the total square footage of entire site): Existing: Proposed: Maximum Allowable 0.165 2.92 3.0 BUILDING COVERAGE/FOOTPRINT (1�` floor square footage of all buildings): Existing: 8,559 sq• ft• ( 0.165 % of site) Proposed: 41,404 sq. ft. ( p.gp % of site) Maximum Permitted: 49,2gg sq. ft. ( 0,95 % of site) GREEN SPACE WITHIN VEHICULAR USE AREA (green space within the parking lot and interior of site; not perimeter buffer): Existing: p sq. ft. ( Q %a of site) Proposed: p sq. ft. ( p % of site) VEHICULAR USE AREA (parking spaces, drive aisles, loading area): Existing: 16,953 sq. ft. ( 32.7 % of site) Proposed: 375 sq. ft. ( p g % of site) Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 2 of 8 Revised 01/12 0 IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RATIO (total square footage of impervious areas divided by the total square footage of entire site): Existing: 0.41 Proposed: 0.89 Maximum Permitted: 0.95 DENSITY (units, rooms or beds per acre): BUILDING HEIGHT: Existing: 0 Existing: 15' Proposed: 159 rooms na. 133.6 rooms/acreProposed: � pp� Maximum Permitted: 159 rooms (g� 133.6 rooms/acreMaximum Permitted: 100' per HDA2014-08007 OFF-STREET PARKING: Existing: 42 spaces Proposed: A minimum of 191 spaces Minimum Required: 191 spaces WHAT IS THE ESTIMATED TOTAL VALUE OF THE PROJECT UPON COMPLETION? $ 10.000.000 ZONING DISTRICTS FOR ALL ADJACENT PROPERTY: North: Tourist (T) South: Tourist (T) East: Tourist (T) West: ounst STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS '�j,l, I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all Sworn to and subscribed before me this ' day of representations made in this application are true and U I . to me and/or by accurate to e best of my knowledge and authorize I � City /r �pre ntatives to visit and photograph the 't v✓ ho is personally known has prop�rty scribed in ' application. produced as identification. / � � �� of property owner or representative Notary public, My commission expires: ,�I=r�� Notary Public Stats ot Fbride ;F . Richard DeCastro 11 '�j� My Commiaslon EE 224888 ?aw Expiros 08I14/2o19 Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 3 of 8 Revised 07/12 ° Clearwater U Planning & Development Department Flexible Development Application Site Plan Submittal Packa�e Check list IN ADDITION TO THE COMPLETED FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT (FLD) APPLICATION, ALL FLD APPLICATIONS SHALL INCLUDE A SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL PACKAGE THAT INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION AND/OR PLANS: ❑ Responses to the flexibility criteria for the specific use(s) being requested as set forth in the Zoning District(s) in which the subject property is located. The attached Flexible Development Application Flexibility Criteria sheet shall be used to provide these responses. ❑ Responses to the General Applicability criteria set forth in Section 3-914.A. The attached Flexible Development Application General Applicability Criteria sheet shall be used to provide these responses. ❑ A signed and sealed survey of the property prepared by a registered land surveyor including the location of the property, dimensions, acreage, location of all current structures/improvements, location of all public and private easements including official records book and page numbers and street right(s)-of-way within and adjacent to the site. ❑ If the application would result in the removal or relocation of mobile home owners residing in a mobile home park as provided in F.S. § 723.083, the application must provide that information required by Section 4-202.A.5. ❑ If this application is being submitted for the purpose of a boatlift, catwalk, davit, dock, marina, pier, seawall or other si milar marine structure, then the application must provide detailed plans and specifications prepared by a Florida professional engineer, bearing the seal and signature of the engineer, except signed and sealed plans shall not be required for the repair or replacement of decking, stringers, railing, lower landings, tie piles, or the patching or reinforcing of existing piling on private and commercial docks. ❑ A site plan prepared by a professional architect, engineer or landscape architect drawn to a minimum scale of one inch equals 50 feet on a sheet size not to exceed 24 inches by 36 inches that includes the following information: ❑ Index sheet of the same size shall be included with individual sheet numbers referenced thereon. ❑ North arrow, scale, location map and date prepared. ❑ Identification of the boundaries of phases, if development is proposed to be constructed in phases. ❑ Location of the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL), whether the property is located within a Special Flood Hazard Area, and the Base Flood Elevation (BFE) of the property, as applicable. ❑ Location, footprint and size of all existing and proposed buildings and structures on the site. ❑ Location and dimensions of vehicular and pedestrian circulation systems, both on-site and off-site, with proposed points of access. ❑ Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks, curbs, water lines, sanitary sewer lines, storm drains, fire hydrants and seawalls and any proposed utility easements. ❑ Location of onsite and offsite stormwater management facilities as well as a narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including calculations. Additional data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual may be required at time of building construction permit. ❑ Location of solid waste collection facilities, required screening and provisions for accessibility for collection. ❑ Location of off-street loading area, if required by Section 3-1406. ❑ All adjacent right(s)-of-way, with indication of centerline and width, paved width, existing median cuts and intersections and bus shelters. ❑ Dimensions of existing and proposed lot lines, streets, drives, building lines, setbacks, structural overhangs and building separations. ❑ Building or structure elevation drawings that depict the proposed building height and building materials. Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtie Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 4 of 8 Revised 01/12 ❑ Typical floor plans, including floor plans for each floor of any parking garage. ❑ Demolition plan. ❑ Identification and description of watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, specimen trees, and other environmentally sensitive areas. ❑ If a deviation from the parking standards is requested that is greater than SO% (excluding those standards where the difference between the top and bottom of the range is one parking space), then a parking demand study will need to be provided. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved. Please see the adopted Parking Demand Study Guidelines for further information. ❑ A tree survey showing the location, DBH and species of all existing trees with a DBH of four inches or more, and identifying those trees proposed to be removed, if any. ❑ A tree inventory, prepared by a certified arborist, of all trees four inches DBH or more that reflects the size, canopy, and condition of such trees may be required if deemed applicable by staff. Check with staff. ❑ A Traffic �mpact Study shall be required for all proposed developments if the total generated net new trips meet one or more of the following conditions: ■ Proposal is expected to generate 100 or more new trips in any given hour (directional trips, inbound or outbound on the abutting streets) and/or 1,000 or more new trips per day; or ■ Anticipated new trip generation degrades the level of service as adopted in the City's Comprehensive Plan to unacceptable levels; or ■ The study area contains a segment of roadway and/or intersection with five reportable accidents within a prior twelve month period, or the segment and/or intersection exists on the City's annual list of most hazardous locations, provided by the City of Clearwater Police Department; or ■ The Traffic Operations Manager or their designee deems it necessary to require such assessment in the plan review process. Examples include developments that are expected to negatively impact a constrained roadway or developments with unknown trip generation and/or other unknown factors. ❑ A landscape plan shall be provided for any project where there is a new use or a change of use; or an existing use is improved or remodeled in a value of 25% or more of the valuation of the principal structure as reflected on the property appraiser's current records, or if an amendment is required to an existing approved site plan; or a parking lot requires additional landscaping pursuant to the provisions of Article 3, Division 14. The landscape plan shall include the following information, if not otherwise required in conjunction with the application for development approval: ❑ Location, size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names. ❑ Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and location, including drip line. ❑ Interior landscape areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressed both in square feet, exclusive of perimeter landscaped strips, and as a percentage of the paved area coverage of the parking lot and vehicular use areas. ❑ Location of existing and proposed structures and improvements, including but not limited to sidewalks, walls, fences, pools, patios, dumpster pads, pad mounted transformers, fire hydrants, overhead obstructions, curbs, water lines, sanitary sewer lines, storm drains, seawalls, utility easements, treatment of all ground surfaces, and any other features that may influence the proposed landscape. ❑ Location of parking areas and other vehicular use areas, including parking spaces, circulation aisles, interior landscape islands and curbing. ❑ Drainage and retention areas, including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations. ❑ Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscaped buffers including sight triangles, if any. Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 5 of 8 Revised 01/12 ° learwater �� Planning & Development Department Flexible Development Application � General Applicability Criteria PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO EACH OF THE SIX (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA EXPLAINING HOW, IN DETAIL, THE CRITERION IS BEING COMPLIED WITH PER THIS DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL. 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. See Narrative 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. See Narrative 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. See Narrative 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. See Narrative 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. See Narrative 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. See Narrative Planning 8� Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562�567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 6 of 8 Revised 01/12 ° learwater �C U Planning & Development Department Flexible Development Application Flexibilitv Criteria PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO THE APPLICABLE FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR THE SPECIFIC USE(5) BEING REQUESTED AS SET FORTH IN THE 20NING DISTRICT(S) IN WHICH THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED. EXPLAIN HOW, IN DETAIL, EACH CRITERION IS BEING COMPLIED WITH PER THIS DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL (USE SEPARATE SHEETS AS NECESSARY). i. See Narrative 2. � 4. 5. 8. Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 7 of 8 Revised 01/72 ° Clearwater Planning & Development Department Flexible Development Application � Affidavit to Authorize Agent/Representative 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed — PRINT full names: Elias Anastasopoulos Anastasios Anastasopoulos 2. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property: 630 S. Gulfview Blvd. (17-29-15-05004-002-0020 and 17-29-15-05004-002-0230) 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for (describe request): Flexible Development approval to permit an Overnight Accommodation Use (Hotel) 4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: Brian J. Aungst, Jr. (Macfar�ane Ferguson & McMullen, P.A.) and Roland Rogers as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. That (I/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. Property Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Property Owner Property Owner BEFORE ME THE UNDERSIGNED, AN OFFICER DULY COMMISSIONED BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, ON THIS DAY OF , , PERSONALLY APPEARED WHO HAVING BEEN FIRST DULY SWORN DEPOSED AND SAYS THAT HE/SHE FULLY UNDERSTANDS THE CONTENTS OF THE AFFIDAVIT THAT HE/SHE SIGNED. Notary Seal/Stamp Notary Public Signature My Commission Expires: Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 8 of 8 Revised 01/12 ° Clearwater U Planning & Development Department Comprehensive Landscaping Application IT IS INCUMBENT UPON THE APPLICANT TO SUBMIT COMPLETE AND CORRECT INFORMATION. ANY MISLEADING, DECEPTIVE, INCOMPLETE OR INCORRECT INFORMATION MAY INVALIDATE YOUR APPLICATION. ALL APPLICATIONS ARE TO BE FILLED OUT COMPLETELY AND CORRECTLY, AND SUBMITTED IN PERSON (NO FAX OR DELIVERIES) TO THE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY NOON ON THE SCHEDULED DEADLINE DATE. A TOTAL OF 11 COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS AND APPLICATION MATERIALS (1 ORIGINAL AND 10 COPIES) AS REQUIRED WITHIN ARE TO BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW BY THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE. SUBSEQUENT SUBMITTAL FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD, IF NECESSARY, WILL REQUIRE 15 COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS AND APPLICATION MATERIALS (1 ORIGINAL AND 14 COPIES). PLANS AND APPLICATIONS ARE REQUIRED TO BE COLLATED, STAPLED AND FOLDED INTO SETS. THE APPLICANT, BY FILING THIS APPLICATION, AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE. PROPERTY OWNER (PER DEED): Captain Bligh's Landing, Inc., Elias Anastasopoulos and Anastasios Anastasopoulos MAILING ADDRESS: 630 S. Gulfview Blvd., Clearwater, FL 33767 PHONE NUMBER: 72�'461-9300 EMAIL: AGENT OR REPRESENTA7IVE: Brian J. Aungst, Jr. (Macfarlane Ferguson & McMullen, P.A.) and Roland Rogers MAILING ADDRESS: 625 COUft St., Clearwater, FL 33756 630 S. Gulfview Blvd., Clearwater, FL 33767 PHONE NUMBER: 72�'441-8966 727-6863099 EMAIL: mac ar.com r�rogers ao .com ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: 630 S. Gulfview Blvd. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: See Narrative Specifically identify the request (include all requested code f)exibility; e.g., reduction in required number of parking spaces, height, setbacks, lot size, lot width, specific use, etc. J: STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS (T I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all Sworn to and subscribed before me this � day of representations made in this application are true and accura e t the best of my knowledge and authorize ' v� . to me and/or by City ep sentatives to visit and photograph the W who is personally known has pro erty descr�d in this application. produced % as identification. of property owner or representative \ Notary public, My commission expires: Planning 8 Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue; CY�F a r, 3 5 e1:�727-5�'i2-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 7 of 2 .�� Notmry Public State o'f " Revised 01/12 � Richard DeCastro II ;` .�� My Commiasion EE 2; of �,, �xqires 08M412018 �y .� a.,.,� . � . ° Clearwater U Planning & Development Department Comprehensive Landscaping Application Flexibilitv Criteria PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO EACH OF THE FIVE (5) FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA EXPLAINING HOW, IN DETAIL, THE CRITERION IS BEING COMPLIED WITH PER THIS COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPING PROPOSAL. 1. Architectural Theme: a. The landscaping in a Comprehensive Landscaping program shall be designed as a part of the architectural theme of the principal buildings proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for the development. See Narrative OR b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscaping program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape standards. See Narrative 2. Liqhting. Any lighting proposed as a part of a Comprehensive Landscaping program is automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the business is closed. See Narrative 3. Community Character. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater. See Narrative 4. Property Va/ues. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscaping program will have a beneficial impact on the value of the property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. See Narrative 5. Speciol Area or Scenic Corridor P/an. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located. See Narrative Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 2 of 2 Revised 01/12 Narrative Hotel @ Captain Bligh's Landing 630 South Gulfview Boulevard Request Flexible Development approval to permit a 159-room overnight accommodation use (59 units from base density and 100 units obtained from the Hotel Density Reserve under HDA2014-08007) in the Tourist (T) District with a lot area of 1.192 acres, a lot width of approximately 286 feet along South Gulfview Boulevard and approximately 280 feet along Bayway Boulevard, a reduction to the front setback (south along South Gulfview Boulevard) from 15 feet to zero feet (to sidewalk), a reduction to the front setback (north along Bayway Boulevard) from 15 feet to zero feet (to building), a reduction to the side setback (east) from 10 feet to eight feet (to sidewalk), a reduction to the side setback (west) from 10 feet to eight feet (to sidewalk), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 100 feet (to highest roof deck from Base Flood Elevation) and a minimum of 191 parking spaces at 1.2 spaces per hotel room, under the provisions of CDC Section 2-803.J; reductions to the required foundation plantings width along the front (north and south) facades of the building as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of CDC Section 3-1202.G; and a two year Development Order, under the provisions of CDC Section 4-407. Proposal The applicant proposed to redevelop the site at 630 South Gulfview Boulevard with a 159-unit overnight accommodation use (hotel). The proposal includes 100 units from the Hotel Density Reserve, approved by City Council under Case Number HDA2014-08007. The parcels are under the same ownership control and the applicant proposes to demolish all existing structures and remove all existing trees. The proposed hotel will offer a Contemporary Tropical architectural design for modern travelers looking for a new way of experiencing the city through innovative spaces with a European inspired style. The design provides a six-story hotel over four levels of parking and 15,092 square feet of accessory retail and restaurant uses, located on the ground level and on Level 10. Accessory retail and restaurant uses associated with this hotel are 9.9 percent of the gross floor area. A minimum of 191 parking spaces, meeting the required parking ratio of 1.2 spaces per hotel room, are located within four levels of structured parking. This proposed hotel is expected to generate approximately 100 new jobs. The site is located within the area designated by eeach by Design as the South Beach/Clearwater Pass District. Beach by Design identifies this area as an area of strategic revitalization and renovation in response to improving conditions on the balance of Clearwater Beach. eeach by Design strongly encourages and supports redevelopment of the area to include hotels, restaurants, commercial uses, mixed uses and attached dwellings. The City has demonstrated through the creation of eeach by Design that it recognizes the need for pedestrian-friendly development in order to create a vibrant active resort and waterfront destination serving tourists and locals alike. It is understood that this broad range of uses contribute to the creation of the unique character and atmosphere that is Clearwater Beach. The proposed hotel fits well into this vision of this District. 1 Site Location and Existing Conditions The subject site is comprised of two lots with a total lot area of 1.192 acres and is located approximately 240 feet east of the intersection of South Gulfview Boulevard and Bayway Boulevard. The site is a double frontage lot, fronting on South Gulfview Boulevard with approximately 286 feet and fronting on Bayway Boulevard with approximately 280 feet. The subject site is currently developed with an outdoor recreation and entertainment use (miniature golf) and retail sales uses. The applicant will demolish all existing structures and remove all existing trees. The subject property is zoned Tourist (T) District with a Future Land Use Plan (FLUP) category of Resort Facilities High (RFH) and is located in the South Beach/Clearwater Pass District of Beach by Design. Compliance with the Flexible Development Standards of CDC Table 2-803 and other CDC Requirements Minimum Lot Area and Width — The minimum lot area for an overnight accommodation use is between 10,000 — 20,000 square feet, pursuant to CDC Table 2-803. The subject site area is 51,862 square feet, which exceeds the minimum lot area requirement of this standard. The minimum lot width for an overnight accommodation use is between 100 —150 feet, pursuant to CDC Table 2-803. The subject site has a lot width of approximately 286 feet along South Gulfview Boulevard and approximately 280 feet along Bayway Boulevard, which exceeds the minimum lot width requirement of this standard. Minimum Setbacks — For an overnight accommodation use, the minimum front setback is between 0— 15 feet and the minimum side setback is between 0— 10 feet, pursuant to CDC Table 2-803. Since this site is a double frontage lot, only front and side setback requirements apply to the site design (no rear setback requirement). The proposed building complies with the minimum front setback of 15 feet from the South Gulfview Boulevard (south) property line. The proposal includes a reduction to the front setback (south) from 15 feet to zero feet to provide for an extended elevated and at-grade sidewalk along the site frontage. The proposal includes a reduction to the front setback from 15 feet to zero feet to the building along Bayway Boulevard (north). The proposed building exceeds the minimum side setback of 10 feet, where the building is designed at a 12-foot side setback from both the east and west property lines. The proposal includes reductions to the side setback (east and west) from 10 feet to eight feet for required egress sidewalks from a building stairwell and a retail unit. The justification of these requested reductions to setback requirements is addressed in the responses to the Flexibility Criteria of CDC Section 2-803.J below. Maximum Hei�ht — For an overnight accommodation use, the maximum building height is between 35 — 100 feet, pursuant to CDC Table 2-803. The proposal includes a building height increase from 35 to 100 feet to the highest rooftop deck of Level 10, in compliance with the standard range. The justification to the building height increase is addressed in the response to the Flexibility Criteria of CDC Section 2-803.J below. Minimum Off-Street Parkin� — For an overnight accommodation use, required parking is between 1.0 — 1.2 parking spaces per room. There are a total of 159 rooms proposed, with a requirement of 191 parking spaces. The proposal complies with the parking requirement providing a minimum of 191 parking spaces on four levels of structured parking. Existing on-street parking within the Bayway Boulevard right-of-way will be modified to reflect changed conditions with this proposal. A loading/delivery area has been located adjacent to the ingress-only driveway on Bayway Boulevard. 2 Mechanical Equipment — Mechanical equipment will be located within the parking levels and on rooftops and will be adequately screened from view from adjacent properties and rights-of-way by solid screening. The screening of inechanical equipment will be reviewed at time of the building permit submission. Si�ht Visibilitv Trian�les — CDC Section 3-904.A restricts structures and landscaping which will obstruct views at a level of 30 inches and eight feet above grade within 20-foot sight visibility triangles at driveways and street intersections. There is a ingress-only driveway proposed on South Gulfview Boulevard. There are no structures that will restrict views and planted landscaping will be maintained to meet this requirement. There is an ingress-only driveway proposed at the northwest corner of the site and an egress-only driveway proposed near the northeast corner of the site. While building structures will be located within these sight visibility triangles, such structures will not impair views due to the nature of the direction of vehicular flow. Vehicular speed at this egress-only driveway will be low and traffic control devices will be included at this driveway to ensure pedestrian safety. The City's Traffic Division has reviewed this proposal and has no issues with these visibility triangle encroachments. Planted landscaping along the Bayway Boulevard side will be maintained to meet this requirement. Utilities — For development that does not involve a subdivision, CDC Section 3-912 requires all utilities including individual distribution lines to be installed underground unless such undergrounding is not practicable. There are no overhead utility lines serving this site along the frontages of South Gulfview Boulevard and Bayway Boulevard. There are overhead utility lines located along the north side of Bayway Boulevard across this street from the subject site. All utilities that will serve this site will be placed underground. Landscapin� — There are no perimeter buffers required in the T District for this site, pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.D. The proposal does not meet the required minimum five-foot wide foundation planting area along the north (Bayway Boulevard) and south (South Gulfview Boulevard) sides of the building. Along Bayway Boulevard a foundation area is proposed ranging from zero to 7.1 feet, averaging four- feet in width. This area along Bayway Boulevard will be planted with a variety of trees, shrubs and groundcovers to enhance the visual appeal of the site and building. Only accent trees will be planted within this foundation landscape area adjacent to the building due to the upper levels of the parking extending to the front property line, restricting the ability of planted trees to grow tall. Along South Gulfview Boulevard, foundation planting areas have been moved to be adjacent to the South Gulfview Boulevard property line interspersed along an extended on-site sidewalk designed to complement an active streetscape. Landscaping within these areas along South Gulfview Boulevard will enhance the visual appeal of the site and the pedestrian nature of this street. Landscape areas along the east and west sides of the site ranging in width between eight and 12 feet will be planted with palm trees, shrubs and groundcovers that will complement the site and adjacent properties. Sod will be planted within the bottoms of the retention areas located on the east and west sides of the site. A Comprehensive Landscape Program Application has been submitted to address the reductions to foundation landscape widths and is discussed later in this Narrative. Solid Waste — The proposal includes a trash collection facility within the building at the northwest corner. Roll-out 4-yard dumpsters will be staged inside the building on collection days and will be rolled out and returned by trash truck collection personnel. The trash collection facility will have an overhead door to conceal the roll-out dumpsters. 3 Si�na�e —A sign package is not included with this submittal. All proposed signage will meet all applicable requirements of the CDC and Beach by Design. If necessary, a Comprehensive Sign Program will be submitted prior to signage permits. Compliance with Expiration of a Level Two Approval of CDC Section 4-407 Under the provisions of CDC Section 4-407, unless otherwise specified in the approval by the Community Development Board (CDB), an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of the date of the Level Two approval. The proposal includes a request to extend the timeframe to submit for a building permit from one to two years. This requested two year timeframe is due to necessary approval processes of hotel chains, the need to line up financial terms and obtaining necessary permits through local, state and federal governmental agencies prior to the submission for building permits. It is noted that numerous other development approvals granted by the CDB for projects on Clearwater Beach have included a similar two year timeframe. Compliance with Flexibility Criteria for Overnight Accommodation Uses of CDC Section 2-803.J With the exception of those properties located on Clearwater Beach, the parcel proposed for development shall front on but shall not involve direct access to a major arterial street unless no other means of access would be possible; Response: The proposal is located on Clearwater Beach and fronts on South Gulfview Boulevard, a major arterial street. An ingress-only driveway is proposed on South Gulfview Boulevard providing vehicular access to Levels 2— 4 of the structured parking within the building. Two driveways are proposed on Bayway Boulevard, a local street. An ingress-only driveway is proposed on the northwest corner of the site and an egress-only driveway is proposed near the northeast corner of the site. The proposal has been reviewed by the City's Traffic Division and been found acceptable, as also supported by a Traffic Impact Study for this proposal. While off- street loading areas are not required on the beach pursuant to CDC Section 3-1406.A.2, deliveries to this hotel will be from a designated loading/delivery area within the Bayway Boulevard right-of-way adjacent to the northwest ingress-only driveway. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this criterion. 2. Height: The increased height results in an improved site plan and/or improved design and appearance; Response: The proposal includes a height of 100 feet to the highest roof deck of Level 10, including any accessory structures associated with the pool area. With the exception of the first four levels of accessory retail uses and parking, the hotel has been designed with north/south and east/west wings in a star or cross shape, providing a building that step backs from property and setback lines and creating a visually appealing design. Landscaped areas along the east and west sides of the site range from eight to 12 feet in width, allowing for a sense of separation from adjacent properties. The proposed height provides a building in scale with other buildings adjacent to and within the vicinity of this site. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this criterion. 4 3. Signs: No sign of any kind is designed or located so that any portion of the sign is more than six feet above the finished grade of the front lot line of the parcel proposed for development unless such signage is a part of an approved Comprehensive Sign Program; Response: A sign package is not included with this submittal. All proposed signage will meet all applicable requirements of the CDC and Beach by Design. If necessary, a Comprehensive Sign Program will be submitted prior to signage permits. Therefore, while this criterion is applicable to the proposal, it will be applied when a sign package is submitted to the City for review. 4. Front setback: a. The reduced setback shall contribute to a more active and dynamic street life; b. The reduced setback shall result in an improved site plan through the provision of a more efficient off-street parking area, and/or improved building design and appearance; and c. The reduced setback will not result in a loss of landscaped area, as those areas being diminished by the setback reduction will be compensated for in other areas through a Comprehensive Landscape Plan. Response: The proposal includes a reduction to the front (south) setback along South Gulfview Boulevard from 15 feet to zero feet (to sidewalk) and reductions to the front (north) setback along Bayway Boulevard from 15 feet to zero feet (to building). The proposed building has been designed to meet the required front setback of 15 feet from South Gulfview Boulevard (also in compliance with the Design Guidelines of Beach by Design). To augment the existing eight-foot wide public sidewalk along South Gulfview Boulevard, the proposal includes extending this sidewalk on-site to the building face at zero-foot setback in order to provide a more active and dynamic street life, allowing for benches along the street as part of proposed planters and outdoor seating areas. A majority of this extended sidewalk will be elevated (up two steps) in front of the hotel entrance and the western retail accessory uses to deal with finished floor elevations. The extended sidewalk along the eastern portion of the site at the driveway and the eastern retail accessory use will be at-grade. Landscaping will be provided in areas along South Gulfview Boulevard to break up and enhance this extended sidewalk on-site. The proposed building has been designed on the ground level along Bayway Boulevard at setbacks ranging from zero feet on the west side to 7.1 feet on the east side. This wedge shaped setback allows for landscaping to be provided softening the street level view of the building. Front (north) setback reductions are also requested for parking Levels 2— 4 and the Levels 5— 6 for the west side of the mid-point of the building hotel wing. Section D of the Design Guidelines of eeach by Design states that building setbacks should be 12 feet from local streets (underlining provided to provide direction). Parking Levels 2— 4 extend to a zero setback for a majority of the site along Bayway Boulevard, a local street. Parking on Levels 2— 4 will be screened by walls 3— 4 feet in height and architectural grills/screens to obscure views of parked vehicles while allowing for necessary ventilation of these parking areas per the Building Code. The proposed north/south wing of the hotel on Levels 5— 6 at a reduced front setback of approximately 1.5 feet to the Bayway Boulevard property line constitutes only approximately 27 percent of the building frontage, with a majority of the building stepped back greatly exceeding the minimum front setback requirement at approximately 34 feet. The building design is unique to this area of the South S Beach/Clearwater Pass District and will be visually appealing with a star or cross shaped hotel above the structured parking levels. The reduced setback for the parking Levels 1— 4 allow for appropriate access to the site and for internal circulation to ensure adequate parking for guests and visitors. Therefore, the proposal is in compliance with this criterion. 5. Side and rear setbacks: a. The reduced setback does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emergency vehicles and/or personnel; b. The reduced setback results in an improved site plan through the provision of a more efficient off-street parking area, and/or improved building design and appearance; and c. The reduced setback will not result in a loss of landscaped area, as those areas being diminished by the setback reduction will be compensated for in other areas through a Comprehensive Landscape Plan. Response: This site is a double frontage lot, requiring only front and side setbacks. There is no rear setback requirement. The building is proposed at a side setback of 12 feet, exceeding the side setback requirement, allowing for landscaping for visual, green relief and spacing to adjacent properties. The requested reduced side setback from 10 feet to eight feet along the east and west sides of the site are to provide required Building Code accessible paths from a building stairwell and the eastern retail unit and only occurs for the southern portion of the site, as these sidewalks exit to South Gulfview Boulevard. These sidewalks to/from this stairwell and retail unit actually provide required access to emergency personnel. There are no perimeter buffers required in the T District for this site, pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.D. Therefore, the proposal is in compliance with this criterion. Off-street parking: a. The proposed development contains no more than 130 rooms; and b. The proposed development is within 1,000 feet of an existing public parking garage with documented available capacity. Response: This criterion applies to applications requesting parking at the rate of 1.0 — 1.2 spaces per hotel room. The proposed 159-hotel requires 191 parking spaces at a rate of 1.2 parking spaces per hotel room. A minimum of 191 on-site parking spaces are being provided within Levels 1— 4, therefore no reduction is being requested. As such, the proposal is in compliance with this criterion. The design of all buildings shall comply with the Tourist District site and architectural design guidelines in Section 3-501, as applicable; Response: The proposed building has been designed to comply with the requirements of the Design Guidelines of Beach by Design. The building is designed in a Contemporary Tropical architectural style with the hotel rooms situated atop four levels of parking with north/south and east/west wings in a star or cross shape. Accessory uses, at a ratio of 9.9 percent of the gross floor area, include retail uses and the hotel entrance/lobby on the ground level of the building and a restaurant located on Level 10, as well as the 0 swimming pool. The four levels of structured parking provide a minimum of 191 parking spaces at the required rate of 1.2 parking spaces per room. Conformance with the Design Guidelines, intended to be administered in a flexible manner to achieve the highest quality built environment for Clearwater Beach, is discussed further: Section A specifically addresses the issue of density. Based on the site area of 1.192 acres, a base density allows for 59 units. Under the Hotel Density Reserve, City Council has approved under Case Number HDA2014-08007 the addition of 100 units, for a total of 159 rooms at an overall density of 134 units per acre. Section 8 specifically addresses height and is delineated in three subsections. Section B.1 provides that a height up to 150 feet may be permitted where additional density is allocated to the development either by TDRs, or via the Destination Resort Density Pool, or via the Hotel Density Reserve with location standards. This proposal provides for a building height of 100 feet to the highest roof deck, where this Section is not applicable. Section 8.2 requires that portions of any structures which exceed 100 feet in height are spaced at least 100 feet apart and also provides for overall separation requirements for all buildings which exceed 100 feet in height. This proposal provides for a building height of 100 feet to the highest roof deck, where this Section is not applicable. Section 8.3 requires the floorplate of any building exceeding 45 feet in height, with the exception of parking levels, be no greater than 25,000 square feet and also requires reduced floorplates exceeding 100 feet in height. The largest floorplate above 45 feet is 23,070 square feet and there is no portion of the building above 100 feet above BFE. Therefore, this provision is supported by this proposal. Section C addresses issues relating to design, scale and building mass. These are addressed in six parts. Section C.1 requires buildings with a footprint of greater than 5,000 square feet or a single dimension greater than 100 feet be constructed so that no more than the two of the three building dimensions in the vertical or horizontal planes are equal in length. The proposed building footprint is greater than 5,000 square feet. The proposed building is greater than 100 feet in length and has been designed utilizing multiple dimensions to ensure that no more than two of the three building dimensions in the vertical or horizontal planes are equal in length. Therefore, this provision is supported by this proposal. Section C.2 requires no plane or elevation to continue uninterrupted for greater than 100 feet without an offset of more than 100 feet. No portion of the proposed building fa�ade continues for more than 100 feet. The building incorporates a series of articulation of the fenestration with various horizontal and vertical dimensions of the fa�ade, none of which exceed 100 feet. Therefore, this provision is supported by this proposal. Section C.3 requires at least 60 percent of any elevation to be covered with windows or architectural decoration. All elevations are covered by more than 60 percent of architectural decoration, composed of windows, balconies and architectural details including decorative grills, reveals and similar detailing. The southern fa�ade facing South Gulfview Boulevard has been designed with 74 percent coverage and the northern fa�ade facing Bayway Boulevard has been designed with 61 percent coverage. The eastern fa�ade has been designed with 64 percent coverage and the western fa�ade has been designed with 67 percent coverage. 7 Therefore, this provision is supported by this proposal. Section C.4 provides that no more than 60 percent of the theoretical maximum building envelope located above 45 feet will be occupied by a building. The overall building mass between 45 and 100 feet constitutes approximately 38 percent of the theoretical maximum building envelope. Therefore, this provision is supported by this proposal. Section C.5 requires that the height and mass of buildings be correlated to: (1) the dimensional aspects of the parcel and (2) adjacent public spaces such as streets and parks. The adjacent South Gulfview Boulevard right-of-way is 60 feet width. The closest point of the building to the south property line is 15 feet. The proposal includes both an extended elevated and at-grade sidewalk broken up with landscape planters. The ground floor will be pedestrian in scale contributing to the pedestrian experience along South Gulfview Boulevard with active retail accessory space. The adjacent Bayway Boulevard right-of-way is 60 feet width. The proposed building has been designed on the ground level along Bayway Boulevard at setbacks ranging from zero feet on the west side to 7.1 feet on the east side. This wedge shaped setback allows for landscaping to be provided softening the street level view of the building. Front (north) setback reductions are also requested for parking Levels 2— 4 and hotel room Levels 5— 6 for the west side of the mid-point of the building north/south wing. Section D of the Design Guidelines of Beach by Design states that building setbacks should be 12 feet from local streets (underlining provided to provide direction). Parking Levels 2— 4 extend to a zero setback for a majority of the site along Bayway Boulevard, a local street. Parking on Levels 2— 4 will be screened by walls 3— 4 feet in height and architectural grills/screens to obscure views of parked vehicles while allowing for necessary ventilation of these parking areas per the Building Code. The proposed north/south wing of the hotel on Levels 5— 6 is designed at a reduced front setback of approximately 1.5 feet to the Bayway Boulevard property line, constituting only approximately 27 percent of the building frontage, with a majority of the building greatly exceeding the minimum front setback requirement (a minimum of 34 feet). The building design is unique to this area of the South Beach/Clearwater Pass District and will be visually appealing. The reduced setback for the parking Levels 1— 4 allow for appropriate access to the site and for internal circulation to ensure adequate parking for guests and visitors. The mass of the building is mitigated through an extensive use of architectural detailing including balconies, decorative grills, reveals and windows. Therefore, this provision is supported by this proposal. Section C.6 permits buildings to be designed for a vertical or horizontal mix of permitted uses. The proposal is for a single use: overnight accommodations with accessory retail and restaurant uses. Therefore, this provision is supported by this proposal. Section D addresses the issues of sidewalk widths, setbacks and stepbacks. These are addressed in three parts. Section D.1 provides for the distances from structures to the edge of the right-of-way should be 15 feet along arterials and 12 feet along local streets (underlining provided to provide direction). The proposed building meets the 15-foot setback along South Gulfview Boulevard (Levels 1— 6). The proposal includes an extended elevated (up two steps) sidewalk for a majority of the site and at-grade sidewalk for the eastern portion of the site around the driveway and eastern retail unit, broken up by landscape planters that will include benches at intervals to allow relaxing areas for pedestrians. The ground floor will be pedestrian in scale contributing to the pedestrian experience along South Gulfview Boulevard with active retail accessory space. The east/west wing of the proposed hotel on Levels 5— 10 is proposed stepped n back from Levels 1— 4 at a front setback from South Gulfview Boulevard of at least 49 feet. The proposed building has been designed on the ground level along Bayway Boulevard at setbacks ranging from zero feet on the west side to 7.1 feet on the east side. This wedge shaped setback allows for landscaping, including accent trees of ligustrum and silver buttonwood, to be provided softening the street level view of the building. Front (north) setback reductions are also requested for parking Levels 2— 4 and hotel room Levels 5— 6 for the of the building north/south wing. Parking Levels 2— 4 extend to a zero setback for a majority of the site along Bayway Boulevard, a local street. Parking on Levels 2— 4 will be screened by walls 3— 4 feet in height and architectural grills/screens to obscure views of parked vehicles while allowing for necessary ventilation of these parking areas per the Building Code. The proposed north/south wing of the hotel on Levels 5— 6 at a reduced front setback of approximately 1.5 feet to the Bayway Boulevard property line constitutes only approximately 27 percent of the building frontage. A majority of the hotel portion of the building greatly exceeds the minimum 12 foot front setback requirement, being proposed at least 34 feet for the east/west wing for Levels 5-10. The building design is unique to this area of the South Beach/Clearwater Pass District and will be visually appealing. The reduced setback for the parking Levels 1— 4 allow for appropriate access to the site, internal vehicular circulation and the provision of at least the required amount of parking spaces. Therefore, this provision is supported by this proposal. Section D.2 provides that, except for the side and rear setbacks set forth elsewhere in Beach by Design, no side or rear setback lines are recommended, except as may be required to comply with the City's Fire Code. This site is a double frontage lot, requiring only front and side setbacks. There is no rear setback requirement. The east and west sides of the proposed building are proposed at a 12-foot setback, exceeding the side setback requirement of 10 feet. Sidewalks to a stairwell on the east side and a retail unit on the west side of the building, at a reduced setback of eight feet to the side property lines, provide required egress from this stairwell and retail unit as well as providing access for Fire Department personnel. Therefore, this provision is supported by this proposal. Section D.3 addresses setbacks and stepbacks along Coronado Drive. The proposal is not located along Coronado Drive. Therefore, this Guideline is not applicable to the proposal. Section E addresses issues of street-level facades and the incorporation of human-scale features into the fa�ade of buildings in three parts. Section E.1 requires at least 60 percent of the street level facades of buildings used for nonresidential purposes which abut a public street or pedestrian access way will include windows or doors that allow pedestrians to see into the building, or landscaped or hardscaped courtyards or plazas. In addition, parking structures should utilize architectural details and design elements such as false recessed windows, arches, planter boxes, metal grillwork, etc. instead of transparent alternatives. When a parking garage abuts a public road, it will be designed such that the function of the building is not readily apparent except at points of ingress and egress. The proposed building design incorporates an extensive use of storefront windows along South Gulfview Boulevard for the retail units and the hotel, providing inviting views to pedestrians to enhance their experience along this frontage. In addition, the site plan includes landscape planter areas along the south side along South Gulfview Boulevard with Medjool Date Palms to visually enhance the pedestrian experience. Approximately 98 percent of the fa�ade facing South Gulfview Boulevard is �7 transparent at this street level for the retail storefronts and the entrance to the hotel itself. The first four levels of the building will contain structured parking which utilize a screen system to allow for fresh air and light while hiding the cars within. The building fa�ade design along Bayway Boulevard incorporates metal grillwork and false recessed windows to mask the parking area from street level view along Bayway Boulevard. Approximately 78 percent of the fa�ade facing Bayway Boulevard is transparent at this street level. The proposed wedge shaped setback also allows for foundation landscaping, including accent trees of ligustrum and silver buttonwood, to be provided softening the street level view of the building. Therefore, this provision is supported by this proposal. Section E.2 provides that window coverings or other opaque materials may cover no more than 10 percent of the area of any street-level window that fronts on a public right-of-way. The applicant commits to meet this provision, while this is more of an operationally-related requirement. Section E.3 requires that building entrances should be aesthetically inviting and easily identified. All building entrances have a clearly defined opening. Therefore, this provision is supported by this proposal. Section F addresses issues related to parking areas. Parking is addressed via four floors of structured parking completely integrated in to the design of the building. There is a minimum of 191 parking spaces provided, meeting the minimum rate of 1.2 parking spaces per hotel room. The proposal contains 15,092 square feet of accessory uses, which is 9.9 percent of the gross floor area. Therefore, this provision is supported by this proposal. Section G addresses issues related to signage. A sign package is not included with this submittal. All proposed signage will meet all applicable requirements of the CDC and Beach by Design. If necessary, a Comprehensive Sign Program will be submitted prior to signage permits. Section H addresses issues related to sidewalks (also addressed in part by Section D above) and provides that all sidewalks along arterials should be at least 10 feet in width. There exists an eight foot wide public sidewalk within the South Gulfview Boulevard right-of-way. The proposal includes an extended elevated sidewalk (up two steps) for a majority of the site and at-grade sidewalk for the eastern portion of the site around the driveway and eastern retail unit along South Gulfview Boulevard. The proposal thereby extends the public sidewalk width on-site, in essence an additional 15 feet to the building face to expand the pedestrian experience along this roadway. Planters provided along South Gulfview Boulevard will help break up the sidewalk areas, providing visual relief to pedestrians. The proposal will maintain the existing sidewalk width along Bayway Boulevard. Any repairs to sidewalks necessitated by proposed construction tying into the existing sidewalks to the west and east sides of the site will conform to fit, finish and materials of these existing sidewalks. Pavers will be used to distinguish driveways as they cross the sidewalk along Bayway Boulevard and South Gulfview Boulevard. Therefore, this provision is supported by this proposal. Section 1 addresses issues related to street furniture and bicycle racks. The proposal will provide benches at intervals as part of landscape planters and outdoor seating along the extended sidewalk area south of the retail spaces. Bicycle racks are proposed in strategic locations on the east and west sides to promote a transportation alternative. 10 The developer will coordinate with City staff with regard to materials, locations and installation methodology of both the benches and bicycle racks. Therefore, this provision is supported by this proposal. Section J addresses issues related to street lighting. No additional street lighting is proposed with this application. Therefore, this Section is not applicable to the proposal. Section K addresses issues related to fountains. No fountains are proposed with this development. Therefore, this Section is not applicable to the proposal. Section L addresses issues related to materials and color. The proposed hotel building utilizes Contemporary Tropical architectural design with European inspired style. The building facades are broken up with a variety of offsets, windows, balconies and rooflines. Finish materials and building colors will support coastal vernacular themes. The building will be painted white and accented by shades of light coastal blue. The contemporary style of the design will use materials and colors to blend in and match its surrounding neighborhood. Therefore, this provision is supported by this proposal. 8. Lot area and/or width: The reduction shall not result in a building which is out of scale with existing buildings in the immediate vicinity; Response: The site is 51,862 square feet in area (1.192 acres) and exceeds the minimum requirements of the CDC of between 10,000 – 20,000 square feet. The subject site has a lot width of approximately 286 feet along South Gulfview Boulevard and approximately 280 feet along Bayway Boulevard, which exceeds the minimum lot width requirement of the CDC standard of between 100 –150 feet. Therefore, there is no reduction requested for lot area or lot width and the proposal is in compliance with this criterion. 9. The parcel proposed for development shall, if located within the Coastal Storm Area, have a hurricane evacuation plan requiring the use close when a hurricane watch is posted; and Response: The site is located within the Coastal Storm Area and a hurricane evacuation plan is required by the Hotel Density Agreement approved by City Council under Case Number HDA2014-08007. Submission of this hurricane evacuation plan will be submitted prior to the issuance of any building permit. 10. A development agreement must be approved by the city council pursuant to F.S. §§ 163.3221-163.3243 and Community Development Code Section 4-606 if the development proposal exceeds the base density and/or base F.A.R. established for the underlying Future Land Use designation. The development agreement shall: a. Comply with all applicable requirements of the "Rules Concerning the Administration of the Countywide Future Land Use Plan" as they pertain to alternative density/intensity, and as amended from time to time; b. Be recorded with the clerk of the circuit court pursuant to F.S. § 163.3239, with a copy filed with the property appraiser's office, and a copy submitted to the PPC and CPA for receipt and filing within 14 days after recording; and 11 c. Have its development limitations memorialized in a deed restriction, which shall be recorded in the Official Records of Pinellas County prior to the issuance of any building permit for the overnight accommodations use. Response: A development agreement has been approved by City Council under Case Number HDA2014-08007, which allocated 100 hotel units from the Hotel Density Reserve. Therefore, the proposal is in compliance with this criterion. 11. Accessory Uses: a. Accessory uses must be incidental, subordinate, and customarily accessory to overnight accommodations; b. The following shall apply to required parking for accessory uses: i. Accessory uses located within the building interior may occupy between 15 percent and 20 percent of the gross floor area of the development, but only when additional parking is provided for that portion of the accessory uses which exceeds 15 percent. The required amount of parking shall be calculated by using the minimum off-street parking development standard for the most intensive accessory use(s). Where there is a range of parking standards, the lowest number of spaces allowed shall be used to calculate the additional amount of off-street parking required for the project. In projects where the interior accessory uses exceed 20 percent of the building gross floor area, all interior accessory uses shall be considered additional primary uses for purposes of calculating development potential and parking requirements. ii. Regardless of the gross floor area percentage, overnight accommodations with fewer than 50 rooms that have a full service restaurant shall comply with the parking standards for the restaurant use as contained in Table 2-803. The lowest number of spaces allowed shall be used to calculate the additional amount of off-street parking required for the restaurant; c. In addition to the requirements above, for those projects that request additional rooms from the Hotel Density Reserve established in Beach by Design and whose interior accessory uses are between ten percent and 15 percent of the gross floor area of the proposed building, density shall be calculated as follows: i. Calculate the maximum number of units allowed by the base density; ii. Calculate the maximum number of units that may be allocated from the Hotel Density Reserve established in Beach by Design; iii. Add the figures determined in i. and ii. to determine the total number of units allowed for the site; iv. Divide the total number of units allowed, as calculated in iii., by the total land area to determine the resulting units per acre for the project site; v. Determine the total floor area of all interior accessory uses exceeding ten percent of the gross floor area of the proposed building; vi. Subtract the figure determined in v. from the total land area, and divide this difference by 43,560 to determine the net acreage; 12 C'_ e. vii. Multiply the net acreage derived in vi. by the applicable resulting units per acre figure determined in iv. The resulting product is the maximum number of rooms allowable for the project. viii. The final allocation of rooms from the Hotel Density Reserve shall be determined by multiplying the net acreage determined in vi. by the base density and subtracting this product from the maximum number of rooms allowable for the project as determined in vii. Signage for any accessory use shall be subordinate to and incorporated into the primary freestanding signage for the overnight accommodation use. In no case shall more than 25 percent of the sign area be dedicated to the accessory uses; Those developments that have obtained additional density from the Destination Resort Density Pool established in Beach by Design are not subject to the requirements set forth in Sections 2-803.1.11.a—d. Response: Accessory retail and restaurant uses associated with this hotel are 9.9 percent of the gross floor area, not invoking any density reduction or increased parking requirement. A sign package is not included with this submittal. All proposed signage will meet all applicable requirements of the CDC and Beach by Design. If necessary, a Comprehensive Sign Program will be submitted prior to signage permits. This proposal has not obtained additional density from the Destination Resort Density Pool. Therefore, the proposal is in compliance with this criterion. Compliance with General Applicability Criteria of CDC Section 3-914.A 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density, and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. Response: The proposal includes a 159-room hotel with four levels of parking and accessory uses, including ground-level retail spaces and a rooftop restaurant. The proposed building will be Contemporary Tropical architecture. The subject site is surrounded by a myriad of uses indicative of a tourist destination including overnight accommodations, retail sales and services, bars and nightclubs, restaurants and attached dwellings. The proposed hotel will constitute an appropriate use for the neighborhood and is a targeted desired use with the South Beach/Clearwater Pass District of eeach by Design. Landscaping proposed will complement and enhance surrounding properties. The proposal supports this criterion. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. Response: The proposal is consistent with the character of adjacent properties and with the intent and vision of Beach by Design, the South Beach/Clearwater Pass District and the Design Guidelines. The proposal is similar in nature vis-a-vis to the form and function of adjacent and nearby properties. As mentioned, the subject site is surrounded by a myriad of uses indicative of a tourist destination including overnight accommodations, retail sales and services, bars and nightclubs, restaurants and attached dwellings. The proposal will not impair the value of adjacent properties. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this criterion. 13 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. Response: The proposal includes an ingress-only driveway on South Gulfview Boulevard and separate ingress-only and egress-only driveways on Bayway Boulevard. The proposal will likely have no or little effect on the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood and is, therefore, consistent with this criterion. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. Response: The proposal includes an ingress-only driveway on South Gulfview Boulevard and separate ingress-only and egress-only driveways on Bayway Boulevard. The addition of a 159- unit hotel will increase the amount of traffic in the area, however, not below acceptable Levels of Service of the surrounding roadways, as evidenced by a Traffic Impact Study conducted for this proposal. The expected increase in traffic has been mitigated with on-site stacking spaces and the number of parking spaces provided is at least meeting the minimum parking requirement of the CDC. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this criterion. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. Response: As previously discussed, the subject site is surrounded by a myriad of uses indicative of a tourist destination, including overnight accommodations, retail sales and services, bars and nightclubs, restaurants and attached dwellings. The proposed building will be Contemporary Tropical architecture and will complement and enhance adjacent properties. The proposal is consistent with Beach by Design and, therefore, consistent with this criterion. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. Response: The proposal minimizes adverse visual and acoustic impacts on adjacent properties. There should be no olfactory impacts of any kind. Active accessory uses are located on the south side of the site adjacent to South Gulfview Boulevard, away from attached dwelling uses on the north side of Bayway Boulevard. An accessory restaurant and swimming pool are located on Level 10 of the hotel. Residential uses located on the north side of Bayway Boulevard are 3— 5 stories in height above ground-level parking. Any noise generated by the uses on Level 10 should not affect these residential uses due to the height differential. The east/west portion of the hotel tower, including these accessory uses on Level 10, is designed greatly exceeding the minimum 15-foot front setback of at least 34 feet to the Bayway Boulevard property line. Parking will be buffered from view by the building and landscaping on the ground level and by screening walls and architectural grills/screens on Levels 2— 4. Dumpsters will be located within an enclosed dumpster room on the northwest side of the building. The overhead door will only be open on trash pickup days to allow trash truck personnel to move the dumpsters to and from the trash staging area inside the building to the truck for disposal, which is similar to other hotels within the South Beach/Clearwater Pass District. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this criterion. 14 Compliance with Comprehensive Landscape Program Criteria of CDC Section 3-1202.G The request includes reductions to the required foundation planting width along the front (north and south) facades of the building, as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of CDC Section 3-1202.G. CDC Section 3-1202.E.2 requires a foundation planting width of a minimum five- feet for 100 percent of the building fa�ade with frontage along a street right-of-way, excluding space necessary for building ingress and egress, Along the north side of building fa�ade along Bayway Boulevard the foundation landscaping width ranges from zero to 7.1 feet, with an average of four feet in width, due to the proposed building location. Along the south side of the building fa�ade along South Gulfview Boulevard the foundation landscaping width is zero feet. Foundation landscaping along the south building facade is proposed to be relocated to be adjacent to the front property line along South Gulfview Boulevard at a width of seven feet from the property line. 1. Architectural theme. a. The landscaping in a comprehensive landscape program shall be designed as a part of the architectural theme of the principal buildings proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for development; or b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive landscape program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape standards. Response: Along the north side of building fa�ade along Bayway Boulevard the foundation landscaping width ranges from zero to 7.1 feet, with an average of four feet in width, due to the proposed building location. Accent trees (ligustrum and silver buttonwood) are planned within this northern foundation planting area to deal with a limited planting area. Shade trees and palms cannot be planted within this area due to the building structure of the second floor extending to the property line above this landscape area. These accent trees can be trimmed to deal with this height issue and will also aid with screening the first floor parking garage (along with architectural elements), while providing visual relief to pedestrians along the public sidewalk and to residential units located on the north side of Bayway Boulevard. Along the south side of the building fa�ade along South Gulfview Boulevard the foundation landscaping width is zero feet. Foundation landscaping along the south building facade is proposed to be relocated to be adjacent to the front property line along South Gulfview Boulevard at a width of seven feet from the property line. Foundation landscape areas have been moved to be adjacent to the South Gulfview Boulevard right-of-way to enhance the pedestrian experience and to provide planting areas more conducive to tree foliage, rather than fronds or branches touching the building structure (and therefore having to be constantly trimmed back). Planters along South Gulfview Boulevard provide a rhythm along the street frontage and are planned with benches at intervals to allow pedestrians the ability to relax while visiting establishments along South Gulfview Boulevard. Medjool date palm trees are planned within the planters along South Gulfview Boulevard, used in other areas of the beach, therefor supporting the "beachy" character of this area. Cabbage palms are proposed along the east and west sides of the site within an eight-foot wide planting area, due to the location and height of the proposed building and the location of adjacent buildings. Planters and planting areas are proposed with shrubs and ground covers that will work well within this beach area. The only sod proposed for the site is within the bottoms of the open retention ponds along the east and west sides of the northern portion of the site. The proposed landscaping meets the requirements of the CDC and Beach by 15 Design with regard to landscaping. The proposed landscape plan complements and supports the Contemporary Tropical style of the proposed building, in compliance with this criterion. 2. Lighting. Any lighting proposed as a part of a comprehensive landscape program is automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the business is closed. Response: This criterion is not applicable to the subject site because the hotel does not close. However, the proposal will comply with the requirements of CDC Article 3 Division 13, Outdoor Lighting. 3. Community character. The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive landscape program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater. Response: The proposed landscaping will make the property more attractive thereby enhancing the surrounding community character. The landscape plan meets the requirements of the CDC and Beach by Design. All parking is provided within structured parking, where no interior landscape area is required. Ground level parking along Bayway Boulevard (north) will be landscaped with accent trees due to Levels 2— 4 parking decks extending to the front property line, along with shrubs and groundcover. Landscaping will be provided in planters along South Gulfview Boulevard to break up and enhance the extended sidewalk on-site that will lead to a more active street life. Medjool date palm trees are planned within the planters along South Gulfview Boulevard, used in other areas of the beach, therefor supporting the "beachy" character of this area. Perimeter buffers are not required by the Community Development Code in the T District except as otherwise required by eeach by Design. The proposal includes landscape areas along the east and west sides of the site from eight to 12 feet in width, which will be planted with cabbage palm trees, shrubs and groundcover to enhance the visual appearance of the site and to provide a sense of separation between adjacent uses. The proposal is in compliance with this criterion. 4. Property values. The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive landscape program will have a beneficial impact on the value of property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. Response: The landscaping provided is consistent with the requirements of eeach by Design and other developments approved by the City in the South Beach/Clearwater Pass District of eeach by Design. The proposal will improve the aesthetics of the site and should have a beneficial impact on surrounding areas, in compliance with this criterion. 5. Special area or scenic corridor plan. The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive landscape program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located. Response: The subject property is located within the Beach by Design special area plan. Perimeter buffers are not required by the Community Development Code in the T District except as otherwise required by Beach by Design. Parking areas are required by Section F of the Design Guidelines within Beach by Design to be buffered from public rights-of-way by a landscape buffer wall, fence or other opaque material at least three feet in width and 3.5 feet in height. 16 Ground level parking is provided adjacent to Bayway Boulevard, which is buffered by opaque building walls and a foundation landscape area ranging from zero feet to 7.1 feet, with an average of four feet in width. Parking on Levels 2— 4 will be buffered by walls and architectural grills/screens to obscure views of parking within the parking garage. The proposal is in compliance with this criterion. 17 '�#:'��10133178 BK: 16915 PG: 525, 05/13/2�1� at 03:33 PM, RECORDING 4 PAGES $35.�0 D DOC STAMP COLLECTION $�:70 KEN BURKE, CLERK OF COURT PINELLA3 ��OUNTY, FL BY DEPUTY CLERK: CLKDMC5 itecording - S 35_SO Doc Stamps 70 S 36.20 Prepared by and Return to: iioward C. Siross, Esq. STROSS LAW FIRM, P.A. l8(YI Pepper Tree Drive Oldsmar, FL 34677 File #3{xl9 Parce! No.: ��.: .� �, ,, r# �, -' -+ � ' �5 r} � . • r• � �` i .� .t -- �. rv __ �`�a + r. �� ♦4: ' � ��, ', 1 y � � 5 y � � � ♦ . I a r ' _ �+ � � 1 5 ` L 1 ` 1 ' � Quit Claim Deed `�� _ : f " ,. (Whaever used herein, the tcrms "Grantor" or "Grantee" shaiF�iii�lude lhe kryirs, personal representatives, successors and/or assigns of the respactive pertie�s�herStb; the vse of the singuiar number shall includ� the plural, and the p�uc� th��ingu�� aa£1 the use of any gcnder shall include ali genders) �, ;,, ��, ,�. � t � . .� � �. . ` � ,` , � .`�� ` THiS QUIT CLAIM DEED, made this a3fdday o��il;'20I0, by Elias Anastasopoatos and Eleni Anastasopoulos a/k/a Helen An�sopouto,s� hu'sband attd wife (collectively "Grantor"}, whose address is 1600 Guif Boulevard;RH `1=�Clear}�rater, Florida 33767, to Elias Anastasopoulos, a married man, and Anastssios �sta�o�oirles,-� married man (collectively "Grantee"), whose addresses aze 1600 Gulf Bou�ev.�rd, �-I-l;.��earwater, Florida 33767, and 630 South Gulfi+iew Bouievazd, Clearwater, Flozi�a��'16,7, respec`tively. , ., ,- , . , , , ,�, '. . WITNESSEI'�`t�hat C�ranto�,•ft�r and in consideration of the sum of $10.00 Dollars, lawfui money of the United�ta�es�f,America, to Grantor in hand paid by Grantee, the receipt and whereof is hereby acknow'�edge�;�r�s�ret�ised, released and quitclaitned to the Grantee, Grantee's heirs and assigns forever,;all ihe rig�t � title, interest and claim of the Gxantor in and to the fo] lowing described real pruperE�'�� Rihellas �gunty, State of Florida, to wit: , , __- , . � . ___ `�e �eri�X 5 feet, LESS the Northerly 5 feet thereof, of Lot 24 in Block B, `;' �, �BA�Zf SII3E�UBDIVISION NO. 5, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in , ��.�.�at�$qok 38, Pages 38 and 39, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida ,,�, � , ' '�,�., ,�'�'d properiy is nat the homestead of the Grantor. SUBJECT TO covenants, restrections, easements and reservations of record and taxes for the year 2010 and subsequent years not yet due and payable. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same together with all and singalar tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances ther�unto belonging or in anywise appertaining, and all the privilege, right, title, interest, estate, lien, equity and claim whatsoever of Gran�tor, either in law or equity, to the only proper use, benefit and behoof af Grantee in fee simple forever. .PI�EJ��AS COUNTY FL OFF. REC. BK 16915 PG 526 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has signed and sealed these presents the day and yeaz ;�� first above written. Signed, Seal and Delivered in the presence of � (Signature (Pri ed Name} �. ,� �.,�'c. �. � G�2..� (sig ture) j�nhP�-t�! 1R��hn�P � (Pr�nted Name) ,, ,, ,, �' --,� , _ , - . _'�, ', �� . , ,,' , � � ,� , �,�,� �, , .. .� �. ,. ,- - �, . , , ,' , , . , � '�� , ��; ,� , , �� ' '� ,� �� ;; � , ,' - _ c � � Elias Anastasopou ds ; � . ,, �'. .� . , ,�, , > �� . � ,', , . �, ` C ` \ � ♦� � � `� i� `�� i' � � � i .� ♦`� � � � � � � � � � � ��ture) � _ . �`�� h ' � , ,= -� .,�, ,; ,, ,, .> „ (Pri Name) �,� �,'. ; ' , , �— ,� ��,`, �� ' - ' � ' ,',-'� '�;�, �' � � Eleni Anastasopoulos, a/k/ elen ,� . - �:s ,�� .' ��> - �11`�-Y:�� . � � � —r--�--•-- (Signat e) u / � � , � ' �'.; t w � „�,, (Prin d I)Tapie� �.��,�`, „ , , '�'. � , , �„ �; ,� �, , :� �• .; ,. . .� '� `� , .__ , STAT,F QF FL'�RIISA" � CO�IN�i3F�i�LLAS ,� .� .� ,� �, The fdr,�goin��instrument was acknowledged �'-�4nastasc,poulos, who is personally known ic�iltif��tion. AllaStclSO�OIlIOS befare me this i4� day of May, 2410, by Eiias to me or produced ��p�, „� vs l..c �.ks.e. as NOTARY PUBLIC; N07'ARY PUBLICSTATE OF PLOItIDA �L� Kimberly M. Taulbee $ign; , . _ Commission �DD914861 Print : Kittxber M. Taulbee �.,,..,,..s� Exp'ues: SEP.10 2013 r�'"�� Tf{H�� AT�+L'�TiC 901VDINOC�Q�qV�, My Commission Expires: 9-10-13 ' PINFL�icAS COUNTY FL OFF. REC. BK 16915 PG 527 STATE OF k'�..ORIDA COUNTY OF PINELLAS The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this �7y`h Anastasopoulos, who is personally known to me or produced identification. NOTARY Pi18LiC�97'AT$ OP FLQRIDA ,��"�",.� xunberly M. Taulbee � �Comm3calon �►DD919861 i,..,,,�..r' Expireet SEF! 10� 1013 �o*r�� n;ar �nan nc sa�rrc ca,, nra NOTARY PUBLIC; � �, �, +, 1 � ,�``---� - '. - �, �,�, _ day of May, 2010,�iy�El�n�i �`� �C. i�r v£ i � L� £�,�S.F.';as -- . , ,. ,- - `. . , ,� ,, , .', ,, . ,; � '. , . �R ', ,� '! -- �` '� .� �. ,- -_; __ , �' ___ . ,, ,,� Sign: � ' Print name: Kimberl M. T'at�Tbee..-�.' My Commission Expires: 9-10-13 � ;`. .� .� .'� _ � .', `� c . � `. . �� ..' � � `%i��`- ,'. � �,� � �' . � .\ �` ` ; _ . ` �s ..# ~• �, + . .> � . 4 11 '1 �� 1 � � � + L.11��1liYYRV)WF4�\�4V7i(1lVI y'�1'.r'M ' � ' I t m � ♦y'� -} ��i / �x� �` f �* ,4 d f v E 1 4 �r f F 1 ! * � �i 1 � � ,4 y Jl e. \ ' _ ♦\t�` � _ � . �' \ `� \ •\\` � �/ �`` \ � \` \ � `��` ♦ � `l / � �` \♦ a � ♦ � � 1 ♦ � 1 � ♦`�` / � ♦ � � / ♦ �—� / , ' pIN�I,��AS COUNTY FL OFF. REC. BK 1fi915 PG 528 t EXHIBIT "A" � ', — �, LEGAL DESCRIPTION ''-` �� _`�� i.w> . ` �' , � - � �� Easterly 5.00 feet, LESS the Northerly 5.00 feet thereof of Lot 24 in Block B, BA�'��E SUBDMSION NO. 5, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 38, P�,e"s38�id,�Q, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida �� ' �` �' �' , , � �, � �� '� ,` '� - .� '� _'� �. ,, ,- __ , �' _ _ _ _ ,� „ ,, �� r . ` � i � _ i` � ` �``� i � ` i > �� ` i i � � i i � t �� i i � ♦ i \ \ �� i � � r� �� i ♦ � � � ♦ � \ � _ „� �., � �! �F d .� `D ,, i .' . � i I Y� - � _`, �� y_ ,rr � ' )P f . Y% lf� � — r' +t YP ,� '� ° 4 , ' \ e � � 5 � ♦ 4 � ! ♦ 1 4R~'�., Y _.e � + h . _ . /�' ` � ♦ � _ `•♦ / `\ � � �M1� ( � \ � \ � � � \ � � ` \ \`�� ` � �♦ � � � �` ♦ \ , \ �` \ � f / ��` � / ' � / 0 � �.. . _ �1 ot �o � +� o � �� Te � �` � � �11 . . � ,�(� Ai1pn1+" a11fM At. �.�r��•: . . t. 11�Mt11RKry OtW �� R�� r��! iqu/,CO IOR�Me�Op1, �n..nwww 56113613 t9/!A•' V'�.WWY�(LrA�% �I�S �#Il'� � Med. ��. a�ta �.� asy �, n. �o ea �, AO!& HSATH PRIl�, also known a0 ROBS BSdTL. s marriad xomsn, hsrw��« nUd �I�� yrmrw, �e SLIAS ANASTl8dP00IA8 attA IiYLSN Al(6�'�L�� ilig wiie, �r)ia� pa�olN�+ edArar u �� Tlotlda 900'l� �r od&d t�i ornnta: c1lrw.r w+ Ma ,b wr �y�ry.r^ w� 4Wi r� ii. w�w r �w I.�www�': 1 A,. yM,l,n� Md e�w..utl�n rf «hw d w w..o�r�n rr r�. d �[YI. Tba IM sNnb►� !a �nd tn wn�JrnNoa oJ �e nm a! iI0.00 md N6rr w�iit arui�e�fiom. frov�pi w%cnvJ b%nr�f �. �er.iry W+�f.� �. w~w. -.:ans. ea. wMa. ,.I.ru. tinwri ani asnJlnw anro �A. yr�Ne�.g 1tial oeA+b lwd,uw►. t� Plnell6a Cwnb� Fkrlde� ds� Rh� Bsat 100 t�et ot LoC 1� aa0 all of Lot� 2 3�Y�� 2�. ��. �k B, HAT3IDS SOSIII9�SIwr S0. 5� t000rdini tp Lht pltt tihsrsof �s P�oordsd la FUE �ook 38, Pags 38� Pubiio ��aords of Pin�ll�a Coun��, florid�, �rhf d� 90HJBCR TO R�SSRYATIOMS, 1KSiITCIIOYe, A1� �4St�40 � 6�9A�6NTS OR MCOAD. � � tot�a�. _1 avemtcr �ro asu. guorE�r�r r�uQS Po� rgs �na� i9ea �o auaas4ua�t xsA�s. 0 ON' 7...LL. i/� wah a71 IM (�Ir� Iiw�i1tM11M! �ne �mnneuw ei�nno sww�lrnp or in .n�- arl�e ppwldqln/. �0 �Itt i� t0 � �M r.n�. 6� h• a■rir (a.w► 1U1% du pr�u. lu ,.Ey ce..wa r�d� ,ri o�.Mn � dw a•+� a I.�vl.q7 ,d..d oJ ,o�d iwd (n jM +pn1�►7 I�al lin �nNr �r 0� rM%d ��b N� wd eenarl wld �andt IIr1 /lr 4-rtlanlK 1wn6f■ �f�up�f��_w�no_M-J� ,I(I�N��fl� io sa)li loni wi ■rdI d�Jmd th am� ayeNa 11u Iwr/uI e�tnu �J q �Y W11WI�YR� WO �IIM � �Y b � � M �� /�Y a Oo�anb�► s�. �vgp� � S eg 00 o�r o�Talc��ta�r�xAt � T,,, p. l•�al�"'••• � cet n. ct ia , �n►� 1u �, ..; zw,►. ��, � !�� Zi 3 � �i `86 � �� 71{ � r Ilw ntd ytinra 6w �qard u�J snW liip� ieinn�b /!�s d�y M! 1� fa�� .6.0. .+Iqw, .. .. � .....1G. . .. � � .....�...«...» , ......_.� � �p .� � 8BA?A pHIF ao ka� ...Id4E,A�6►•.�_ ....._.._. aa-.A09Y•-BIZI'l8..._.___._..... ................. srAn or YLOSIDA � r.a .m. ra wewr w cotumr � PIIISIS.AB i xuwn ctartrtr i1r w rM d►f, Ma� �., M.rrK+n +.�r �wMwin/ IA th /ua dmNk rd M dn l�amry �kndi b r.1x aeLr.iiprnw 9emNMf �OPn*+� B08S BEATH PHIlSS,aleo knrnm ae RO88 9SA?it, a �earrird wo�an a.e 1eo.n m er dr pno. ee.n�rd ia ..a ,dw eaNw ue fwepYK i�wm�ew �nQ 6Q9 �alrowYdsei le(ar �+ �Mt 8� eaxolri Ilr 1Me. �NI7MfJf n�` lu�d Nd e111ti�� n� {� d� O�rf ad awr �w .r�.+a ar 27th d+►.r '' • ' � Yeq�.�— � �. D. i� 8B . ',� . /�� _.�i�, ....__. � . � ' � , ..t TbEI i �. �� L/ m� � A11: Nlll Of fN�aA' l AdJ�rrr �S q�rw:fer •�l�io Ao�01� � n��c�o"n u��: '. l�� FkriO� 33�ri0 L 0 ,'� ' � ,'. , � , _ � _ .�'. �. . .. , c--`. -� _.._. . 1. ti,::. , ' „ �, ! " '.,.. . t';�.' � - �. � � �`, �:w: �f: `C:.:�.i�� .M• -�- .. .+�' Ni7M �j � . .�,/•• . ,'+ :'� ` , . :�17':.ti�.��'..�i!','•�i.:y 6 � ; �:. .', _��. �� - .'��;,� __,�,..:� ,. � ;; :... � .w�.`� '.i. •.'�Y,'+�.�{: ::�.�.�;�? ;,� .� '-'I •LX:i,.« �:n: r�'�s:_�;� "r"""!_':.�,��,.�..'�....,,.4 - - ?�on � _' r j��;�i;��'{t:�� . , ""r:ic....... '-. ' .--'- j„-�r• .'31;'� ;''�'? . ' � �' .�.. .. .... � .. �. F �j . .� ' • . �.'7 . + - . �� : �' � � .ht. � � , , r ,. . . Y �'� � i . �: i ' , ' i �.. � '� ' . . . i_ � � � y i � • J ,. i �L Gu1f Coast Consulting, Inc. Land Development Consulting Engineering . Planning • Transpartation . Permitting fCOT Center 138251C0T Boufevard, Suite 605 Clearwater, FL 33760 Phane: (127j 524-1818 Fax: (727j 524-6(190 August 13, 2014 Mr.1'eter Gray, RA DLW Arahitects 542 Dougtas Avenue Dunedin, FL 34698 Re: #634 Sauth Gulfview Blvd. Hotei — Traffic Impact Study Dear Mr. Gray: Please find enclased one (1} signed copy af the Traffic impact Study for the above- referenced property. This study concludes the surroundi.ng roadways and intersections presently operate at acceptable levels af service and would continue to do so with the proposed redevelopment. Please submit this report with your application/plans package to the City of Clearwater. Sinc ely, Robert Pergolizzi, AICP/PTP Principal Cc: 14-041 TRAFFIC YMPACT STUDY FOR HOTEL 630 S. GULFVIEW BLVD. CLEARWATER, FLORIDA PREPARED FOR: LOUIS ANASTASOPOULOUS PREPARED BY: GULFCOAST CONSULTING, INC. AUGUST 2014 PROJECT # 14-041 Robert Pergolizzi, / PTP AICP #9023 / PTP #1 3 I. INTRODUCTI4N The applicant is proposing to develop their property on Ciearwater Beach into a 159 room hotel. This redevelopment will replace the existing rxxiniatnre golf course located at #b30 S. Gulfview Boulevard. This new hotel will be located along the north side of S. Gulfview Boulevard between Bayway Boulevard and the Clearwater Pass Bridge. (See Figure 1) The development oi the property is the subject of a Comprehensive Tnfill Redevelopment in the Tourist "T" zoning district. This application requires an assessment of the traffic impacts of development. A methodology was established with Clearwater Trafiic Engineering staff prior to completing ihis report. II. EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS The szte has fiontage on S. Gulfvzew Boulevard and Bayway Boulevard west of the intersection of Parkway Drive on south Clearwater Beach. Bayway Boulevard is a two-lane local roadway. South Gulfview Boulevard is a two-lane collector roadway with orz-street parking ruruiing along Clea�water Beach. Coronado Drive is a three-lane collector roadway with on-st�•eet parlcing except �or a shoi�t segment between Devon Drive and S. Gulfvi.ew Boulevard which is 4lanes undivided. Hamden Drive intersects �evith S. Gulfview Boulevard at a signalized intersection. The segment of S. Guifview Boulevard between Hannden Drive and the Clearwater Pass hridge is three lanes with a small portion being 4-lanes between Hamden Drive and Bayway Baulevazd. Per the approved methodology traffc coun.ts that were conducted on June 21, 2012 at the following intersections dui�ing the weekday PM peak peiiod of 4-6 PM were used as a basis for this study. S. Gulfview Bivd. / Hamden Drive (sigi�al) S. Gulfview Blvd. / Coronado Drive (signal) Coronado Dxive / Hanaden Drive These counts were supplemented by an inte�tsection tut'ning x�ntovemtent count at Bayway Boulevard/Parkway Drive in August 2014. All traffic counis were converted to annual average equivalents using FDOT seasonal adjustment factors. Existing tcaffic volumes at•e shown in �'igure 2. Existing intersections were analyzed using the HCS+ and SYNCHRO software. The count data, HCS+ and SYNCHRO printouts are included in Appendix A. Presently the signalized intersection at S. Gulfview Boulevard / Coronado Drive opearates at LOS A witl� avexage deiay being 6.6 seconds per vehicle and an intersection capacity utilization (ICU} of 42.5%. Presently the signalized infersection at S. Gulfview Boulevard / Hamden Drive opezates at LOS A witla average delay heing 5.7 seconds per vehicle with ICU of 41.8%. �� .�` ��"�� ' � � , fi �� , �, A �,� � � . � � `_�� ° � � ' � . ` 7� a .� �. � R� .. f t? �Kfl � d �". - �� y �,. �� i 1 � ' ,� 4 . ' � 'uI� ti.. � tia�;4'Y � a� p ., n: �'\ �. e ', � . � � ., ` ., p.. � �', " `� , t�� '. �� . � r �� w A ., '��. : t iy1. . V e�'�� y � � � . �� .� . �. . �. .. � � � � � I �� ' �� r . ,, . . , �...7i�4..�%�,A�_.0_,...�_ .�, , .. � � �..t.. _... � . +, ! ( � �r � �d� �' .'� �, � t r l "` �,�, , �. ... , , 'ad a y ; '.� 'M., � �' �� r��, p ¢ � jrl �: �� t ; . , �c � � .. �� . d�RA� � ;� y p� � • �� r;� ' 6 �S ,� q� � � . < xi �, A _,. , at ` i �� ,,�, 1� , � . r, �e�fr � , , � r �� ., • �, � . , . � 's � r _ ,�� ,� , �� , � , _ � a� � �� '` ��,r ' � , , ,� � ��,�; j�� _ �'1 , , : �1 1 4�� '4 �`�W � y,� ( � k� -° � � 1 � ' • � . - {.,�.� � ' ay�M"'� t �§ � �� rf' ", i � _ � _ . � # 4 „ � � � � r �s� � � �� ' �' ! .t� � . i nri..-4v�,. .. ��^ �l �-� T'^i' „t ,, � � i � . �� ` u.� r� _ _ , .. • � ,� ' " ��, � ..' .�,.�. F ., ., _, .. .x:'S . a: .� K�:�d..k',; J....:'-�. .._. . , yY �.r . ,..., ;�� '1L. .. r w' . ..;' . � � � BRiGHTWATER D1L e = TRAFFIC SICNAL EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC DATE: CYLt1� C088t C0118L�i�, II1C. r.ana ne�e�opmenc cansnte�n8 8/ 2 01 4 �Qi7�RII1G �t�0�A140N PLAl�UNO PYNDIl77'QVG 138251COT BLVD., SIRTE 605 Clearnata, Floride 33760 Phona (T17) 524-1818 Fax: (72� 524-6090 w,r,a,.giilPcosecoons,iltingina.aom DRAWN BY: GJS N PROJELT NO: 14-041 FIGURE: At the ii�tersection of Hamden Drive / Coronado Drive the primary movements are eastbaund-to-southbound an.d northbound-to-westbound, whereas the southbound approach (Hamden Drive} is stop controlled. The HCS+ analysis shows ihe primary rnovements operate at LOS A with delay of 8.2 seconds per vehicle and the southbound stop-conholled movements operate at LOS C with delay of 1 b.6 seconds per vehicle. At the Bayway Bouleva�d/ Parkway Drive intersection all movements operate at LOS A with minimal delay. South Gulfview Boulevard functions as eollector roadway and according to FDOT 2009 QLOS Handbook capacity tables has a LOS D capacity of 1,44a vehicles per hotu on the undivided segment. The segzx�ent of Gulfview Boulevard east of Hamden Drive and Coronado Drive aze both three-lana collector roads with a LOS D capacity of 1,520 vehicles per hour and 2,175 vehicles per hour on the 4-Iane portions. Bayway Boulevard and Hamden Drive north of the Y- intersection with Coronado Dzive are two-lane city roadways with an estin�ated LOS D capacity af 1,040 vehicles per hour. The existin� PM pealc hotu LUS for areas roadway segrnents is shown belo�r: EXTSTTNG ROADWAY CONDITIONS (2014} PM Peak LOS D RoadwaX Segment Lanes Volume Capacitv LOS S. Gulfview (E. of Bayway) 3-lanes 878 1520 B S. Gulfview (Bywy-Hmdn} 4-lanes 1080 2175 C S. Gulview {Haruden -St�') 2LU 493 1440 B S. Gulfview (Sth — Coronado)2LU 611 1440 B Coronado {Hamden — S�h) 2LD 650 152� B Coronada (Devon Dr - S. Gulfview) 4LU 967 2175 C Coronado (Gulfview to Roundabout) 4LD 1556 2900 C Hamden (S. Gulfview-Coxonado} 2LD 732 152Q B Bayway Blvd. (E. of I'arkway Dr) 2LU 115 1040 B Bayway Blvd (W. af Parlcway Dr.) 2LU 131 1 Q40 B Presentiy all roadway segments operate at LOS C or better which indicates acceptable levels oi service and traffic operations. D.I. FUTURE TRA.FFIC CONDITTONS Existing traffic was adjusted by a 2% annual growth x�ate to the expected buzld-out year of 2017 to account for background t�affic.. In addition, naffic from sevexal approved developments was added as background trafiic; these include the proposed Hampton Inn #b55 S. Gul�view, the proposed Clea.rwater Beach Resort at the corner of S. Gulfview and Coronada, the Sea Captain x•edevelapxnent at #40 Devon Drive, the Gulfview Hotel at #625 S. Gulfview, the Entrada Hotel at #521 � S. Gulfview ,Marquesas at #715 S. Gulfview, Mainsteam Hotel "A", Hotel "B", and Hotel "C", the xedevelopment for a hotel at 401-421 S. Gulfview Boulevard, and the proposed Bayway Hotel. Background txa�c volumes are shown an Figure 3. The site will be developed as a 159 xoom resort hotel with ana:enzties. Using Insiitute of Transpoi�tation Engineers (IT�) Trip Generation, 9�` Edition rates, the amount of new trips was calculated and estimates are shown below: . TRIP GENERATION ESTIMATES Land Use Amount Daily Trips PM Peak Trin Hotel 159 Rooms 1299 80 (35/45) The hotel will genei�ate 1,299 daily trips and have 80 PM peak hour trips. The vehicular access will be talcen from S. Gulfview Bouleva�d and Bayway Boulevard via two separate driveways. The expected distribution is shown in Figs►re 4 and is as follows: 60% to / fiom the west and north (48 PM peak hour trips) 40% to / from the east and south (32 PM peak haur trips} The projects impacts to the sunounding roadway system is shown below: PROJECT IMPACT CALCULATIONS Project Road Segment Lanes Project Trips Capaeitv Percent S, Gutfview (E. of Site) 3-lanes 16 1520 1.05% S, Gulfview {Bayway— Site) 3-lanes 32 1520 2.11% S. Gulfview (Bywy-Hmdn) 4-lanes 48 2175 2.21% S. GuIfview (Ha�nden-5�') 2LU 20 1440 1.34% S. Gulfview (5�'-Coronado) 2LU 20 1440 1.39% Coronado (Hamden -- Devon) 2LD 28 1520 1.84% Cozonado (Devon - S. Gulfview) 4LU 28 2175 1.29% Coronado (Gulfview — Roundabout) 4LD 48 2900 1.66% Hamden (Gulfview — Coronado) 2LD 28 1520 1.85% Project t�•affic iinpacts will be primarily to Bayway Boulevard and South Gulfview Boulevard. Project h�c was added fio accumulated background traffic for a build-out of 201'1. All intersectians, roadway segnlenfs and praject driveways were ana.lyzed for future conditions. Future traff c volumes are shown in Figure 5, and the SYNCHRO and HCS+ printouts are included in Appendix B. The signalized intersection at S. Gulfview Bouievard / Coronado Drive would continue to operaie at LOS A with average delay of 7.4 seconds per vehicle and ai� interseetion capacity utilization (ICU) of 56.0%. � W � �I � � m � = TRAFFIC SIGNAL � o , % ^w -- 3a4 � � 358–" 347—f I I „—� �� DEVON DR 1522 VPH TWO�WAY (827 NB, 695 SB} 2ND ST. 3RD ST. STH i � M N � Q � M � � N �( O� � O � ST. � � � � BRIGHTWATFit DR. �4 a oo --- 36 ��.r° 6--� —� i r ss--- rnoo 0 --+ � „� BAYSIDE DR. A�s s M n � JI 4�2 �_?90 N � 1 I N � a a° 3?�` � 4 � � = 249 � 43 � I �ps 2�8 -..,, rn d ��4 -.� �oss vPH �rwo-wnv � (519 NB, 547 SB) r5g � BLVD B�`IW � 5� 9 -- 603 659 -- BACKGROUND PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC DATE: CYllif C08St COI13llItY11$� Il]C. z.�a �o�t c�r� 8/2 014 B!{OIIVERfIlNO TBdI�POHTAIIOA PI.AlQIIN6 t�lQtTIIt(i °�� t3a2s icor sLVn., s[m�e ws DRAWN BY: Clearnder, Flodds 33760 Plauo: (72T) 524-t818 Fu: (727) 524-6090 .�.�.��.�om G J S N N PRO7ECT NO: 14-041 FIGURE: � � � w � � �1N � N � t O I � f N f�� JI + +„-� 1 � + � A O z x 0 V A�M � Q w �a� � �o N } �� +16 r-- +t t +9 --�— • = TRpFFIC SIGNAL DEVON DRTVE / ' �� r� � r � �, � N SI TE 80 PIA TRIPS (35 IN/45 OUT) � BAYWAY BLVD9 � x9 �60x ' ✓ o�. �' � ,+2� �% x,� 1 Q p4 0 + �� N1 �— 7 ! 40% 1 \ Z4 p �R +21 +7 —J +14 —� + 14 —�- +9 �- , � � � ,a --� �—� PROJECT TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION bATE: �f COSSi COIISL11�lIIg� TI1C. �anm•B��m�c con�„�t� 8 /2 014 sqon�nnVa raeNSr�� rWrn�c rsxau�rratc '�. l3825IWTDLVD.,SUI78605 Ciearwnter, Ptorida 33T60 DRAWN BY: rhona (n�san-ieia ra�: �rn�sza-so<w .,�.,�•.�o�o�r�o.� GJS � � a � K � �� U � PROJECT NO; 14— 041 FIGURE: , � � O � I m o � / ry .--- 343 369 -"� 358--f � � it� °m DEVON bR 1550 VPH TWO-WAY (843 NB, 7U9 58) 2ND ST. 31ZD ST. M � � f rn � � A Oq z � � � N 40 ° � STH ST. .� W � ,� � � � p� �� `MI n \ V � BRIGIITWATER DR � --- 55 \ �' � ss — � --� �-- '—I �, � \ A � BAYSIDE DR N L4 JIL r° 98 =1 `l f f o --� f094 VPH TWO—WAY 484�(535 NB, 559 SB) 1� 3p� N�'� �� °R BLVD 3 ` J � f -' w�,� � � � `a73 Bp`� � 260 r 43 � I � `,3J ,0� 287 �.,. � rnv 95� d wm ` J L-._ (� L 603 � = TRAFFIC SIGNAL 14� 659 — I'UTURE PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC 630 S. GULFVIEW H�TEL DATE: G�u1f Coast Consulting, Inc. LandDevelopmontconsuitm8 8/201 �4 Yliqt�BDIC TRAI�POB7'A'[f�i PLAIQ@fC PER►fl777K0 ° 13825 ICOT BLVD„ SUITE 60S C�esrwese , Ftona, 9176o DRAWN BY: rnaw: (�2�sz4isis F.�: (�a��s�a-eoso .+vww.gulFooastaons.�ltinsina.�om G J S -- 610 �� 6fi8 -- PRO7ECT NO: 1 A�-041 FIGURE: The signalized intersection at S. Gulfview Boulevard / Hannden Drzve would operate at LOS B with average delay being 12.2 seconds per vehicle with ICU of 57.2%. Traffic fi•om the Entrada Hotel at #521 S. Gulfview �equires splifi-phase operation of �is traffic signal. At the intersection of Hamden Drive / Coronado Drive, the HCS+ analysis shows the primary n�ovements operate at LOS A with delay of 8.8 seconds per vehicle and the southbound stop-controlled rr►overnents operate at LOS D rvvith delay of 31.9 seconds per vehicle. At the Bayway Boulevard/ Parkway Drive intezsection a]l movements would continue to operate at LOS A with minimal delay. At the S. Gulfview Boulevard /Dt7ve A intersection eastbound left turns would operate at LOS A with 9.0 seconds delay, and soutl�bound movements exiting the site would operate at LOS C with average delay of 17.0 seconds. At the Bayway Boulevard/Drive B intersection all movemeiits would operate at LOS A with minimal delay. Expected roadway conditions with the projec# in impacts are shown below: FUTURE ROADWAY CONDITIONS WITH PROJECT (2017} PM Peak LOS D Roadway Se�ment Lanes Volume Capacitv LOS S. Gulfview (E of Site) 3-lanes 1278 1520 C S. Gulfview (Bayway-Site) 3-lanes 1294 1520 C S. Gnlfview {Bywy-Hnndn) 4-lanes 1528 2175 C S. Gulview {Hamden -5'h) 2LU 631 1440 B S. Gulfview (5th — Coronada)2LU 762 1440 B Coronado {Hamden -- Sth) 2LD 919 1520 C Coronado (Devon - Gulfview) 4LU i550 21'15 C Coronado (Gulfview to Roundabout} 4LD 2290 2900 D Haunden (S. Gulfview-Caronado) 2LD 1094 1520 C Bayway Blvd. (Site� Paxkway Dr.) 2LU 166 1040 B 8ayway Blvd. (W. of Site} 2LU 166 1040 B All roadway segments would continue to operate at LOS D or better. IV. CONCLUSION This analysis was conducted in accordance with a methodology established with Ciry of Clearwater staff. The proposed hotel would gener�ate 1299 daily trips of which 84 would occur dui7ng the PM peak hoi�r. This analysis denlonstrates traff'ic operaiions at nearby intersections and on adjacent roadways would continue at acceptable levels of service with or without the project impacts. 4 s. � i i ��, ,�_ .�_ � � _ 2013 Peak Season Factor Categosy Report - Report Type: ALL Category: 1500 PTNELLAS COUNTYWIDE MOCF: 0.95 Week Dates SF PSCF �1 01/O1/2013 - O1/05/2D13 ^ 1.05^ y^^ 1�11 2 O1/06/2013 - D1/12/2013 1.09 1.09 3 O1/13/2013 - 01/19/2013 1.03 1.08 4 O1/20/2013 - 02/26/2013 i.02 1.07 5 O1/27/2013 - 02/02/2013 1.00 1.05 6 92/03/2013 - 02/09/2013 0.99 1.09 • * 7 02/10/2013 - 02/16/2013 0.97 1.02 * 8 02/17/2013 - 02/23/2013 0.96 1.01 * 9 02/29/2013 - 03/0�2/2013 0.95 1.00 *10 03/03/2013 - 03/09/2013 0.99 a•99 *11 03/10/2013 - 03/lb/2013 0.93 0-98 *12 03/17/2013 - 03/23/2013 0.92 0•g� *13 03/29/2013 - 03/30/2013 0.93 0.98 *14 03/31/2013 - 09/O6/2013 0.93 0.98 *15 04/07/2013 - 09/1�/2013 0.94 a•99 *16 04/14/2023 � 09/20/2013 0.35 1.00 *17 Q9/21/20I3 - 09/27/2013 O.R6 1.01 *1g Q9/26/2013 - O5/0912013 0.96 �.OZ • . *19 05/05/2013 - 05/�1/2013 0.97 1.02 20 05/12/2013 - 05/18/2013 0.98 1.03 21 05/19/2013 - 05/25/2013 0.99 1.04 22 05/26/2013 - 06/O1/2013 0.99 1.OA . 23 06/02/2013 - 06/08/2013 0.99 1.04 29 06/09/2013 - 06/15/2013 1.00 1.05 25 06/16/2013 - 06/22/2013 1.OD 1.05 26 06/23/2013 - 06/29/2013 1.00 1.05 • 27 06/30/2013 - 07/06/2013 1.01 1.06 28 07/07/2013 - 07/13/2013 i.01 1.06 29 07/19/2013 - 07/20/2013 1.02 1.07 30 07/21/2013 - 07/27/2013 1.02 1.07 31 O7/28/2013 - 08/03/2013 �•�� 32 OS/04/2013 - 08/10/2013 1.02 1.07 -� 33 OS/11/2013 - 08/17/2013 1.03 1.08 34 OS/18/2013 - 08/24/2013 1.03 1.08 35 08/25/2013 - 08/31/2013 ,1.04 1.09 36 09/Ol/2013 - Q9/O7/2013 1.05 1.11 37 09/OB/2013 - 09/19/2013 1.06 1.12 38 09/15/2013 - 09/21/2013 1.06 1.12 39 09/22/2013 - 09/28/2013 1.05 1.x� 40 09/29/2013 - 10/05/2013 1.04 1.09 91 10/06/2013 - 10/12/2013 1.03 1.�8 42 1Q/13/2013 - 10/19/2013 1.02 1•�7 43 10/20/2013 - 10/26/2013 1.03 1.08 49 10/27/2013 - 11/02/2013 1.04 1.09 95 11/�3/2fl13 - 11/09/2013 1,04 �•a9 A6 11/10/2�13 - 11/16/2013 i.05 l.11 47 11/17/2013 - 11/23/2013 1.06 1.12 _ 48 11/24/2013 - il/30/2013 1.06 1.12 49 12/O1/2013 - 12/07/2013 1.06 1.12 50 12/OB/2013 - 12/14/2013 1.05 1.11 51 12/i5/2013 - 12/21/20Z3 1.05 1.11 52 12/22/2013 - 12/28/2013 1.04 . 1.09 53 12/29/2013 - 12/3Y/2013 1.03 1•�8 * Peak Season Page i0 of 11 PROJECT: LOCATION: t�ATF� LANE 7Yl�E: NB SB E8 wa _..• PEAK HOi1R f P.H.�. DA7A BAYWAY HOTEL PROdEC7 NO: 44-044 Parkway Dr (NB) & Bayview Blvd (E-W) August4, 201a ,S�EEDLIMIT: SIGNAi.T1M1NG: g � Y R (SECOMDS) (NOTAPPUCABLE) 2 Lane Div NB 25 NB N/A SB N!A SB 2 Lane EB 25 EB 2 Lane W8 25 WB iIME PM 4:00-4:i5 4:15-4:30 4:30-4:45 4:45-5:00 s:oas:�s 5:15-5:30 5:30-5:45 5:45-6:00 7[IVIE PM 5:0Q5 15 5:15-5 30 5:9a5 45 5:45-5 OD PM PEAK HpUR COUNTS NB NB NB SB SB SB EB EB L 7 R L T R L T EB VIIB WB WB 70TAL HOURLY R L T R VOLUME VOLUMES � 44 36 27 23 130 36 422 40 426 25 • 124 HQURLY FiOW DIAGRAM 35 136 � -- ---- 0 10 33 0 7 .0 0 0 '11 i46 0 0 62 7 266 j .} l NB NB NB SS SB SS EB EB EB WB INB WB TOTAL 0 0 0 L T R L T R L 7 R L T R VOLUME I f � e� f' d 0?�c N lw. � 0 �` 0 0.r ��2 �'.�21 . N" 0 r 0� �; 6� S 36 46 �— 6 �' '� 4 +— 32 �5��-�a0,��?*�3,�,� �O�g��'��r�0�'�m��18 0��0 �"�a'�`0� 1; 40 76 ---► i-- 28 A � C�� "'�t 0��•• �"U �,� 0,��3�fl e'+�7.1�'��43 0�.r''`��^"0 i'� rt��6 � 28 62 —► 0 —�, 0 --� 80 ;4 aSp;�'«s'�� ks��'�'�-0�`4x� _''p '�i'�'D r� �x,x�r r�`24..�,; �'k0*�=; �Q"�' � =a6� �� ..0: ;� 35 �-7 f � r— I � 18 0 4 0 0 D 6 78 0 0 28 4 136 i 8 0 4 INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR iNTERS6CT10N PEAK HOUR VOLUME FEAK HOUR VOLUME NB PEAK HOUR VOLUME SB PEAK HOIlR VOLUME EB PEAK HOtJR VOLUME WB 5:00-6:00 136 22 0 82 32 INTERSECTION PHF PFSF NB PFtF 56 PHF EB PHF WB 0,85 0.61 #DIV/0J 0.82 0.?3 1 1 a � ,� �-.� � . f�� fi � � � � � 2 � � � � � � 1 �} � i f�r� � � �� C""e,� g � c.-- � �� J�.� Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3; 811/2014 -�' � '� t l � Lane Canfgurations '�'`� ��` �`�' �' Volume (vphj 278 11 0 513 443 322 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 190d 1900 1900 1900 1900 Sfotage Length {ft) 500 500 500 � Siorage Lanes � 0 � � 7aper Length {ft� 25 25 Lane Util. Facfor 0,97 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 Ped Bike Factar 0.97 0.95 Frt 0.994 0.850 Flt Protected Q.954 Satd. Flaw (prot} 3427 0 Q 3539 3539 1583 Flt Permitfed 0.954 Satd. Flow �perm) 3322 0 0 3539 3639 1502 t�ight Tum an Red No Yes Safd. Flow {R70R) 354 Link Speed {mph) 24 25 25 Link DisEance (ft) 331 260 350 Travel Time �s) 11,3 7.1 9.5 Confl. Peds. (#Ihr) 17 33 17 Peak Hour Factor 0,91 0.91 0.99 0.91 0,91 0.99 Adj. Flow (vph) 305 12 0 564 487 354 Shared l.ane Tra�ic (%) I..ane Group Flow {vph) 317 0 0 564 487 354 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment l.eft RigE�t Left Leff Left Right Median Width(ff} 24 0 0 Linlc Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 96 96 Two way Lefit Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 9.00 1.00 1.00 1.OQ 1.00 Turning Speed {mph) 95 9 95 9 Number of Detectors 1 � 2 2 1 Detector Template Left Left Thru Thru Right Leading Detectar (fi} 20 20 104 i00 20 irailing Detecfor (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 - Detector 1 Position(ffj 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft} 20 20 6 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex GI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Defector 1 Extend {s) . 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . Detecior 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Reteclor 1 Delay (s) 0,0 0.0 0.0 O.d 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) �a � Deteclor 2 Size(ft) 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex De#ector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0,0 O.0 'furn Type NA Perm NA NA Perm Protecfed Phases 4 2 � Gulfview Coronado Exis#ing 2014 2114I2014 EXISTlNG - PM PEAK HOUR Synchro 8 Report RP Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Tirnings 3: 8r�r2o�� -� � � T � � �.ana Group EBL'" EBR NBL � NB7 SBT SBR �� T� Permitied Phases 2 6 Detector Phase 4 2 2 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4,0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Splif (s} 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 To�al Split {s) 25.0 35.4 35A 35,0 35.0 Total Spllt (%) 41,7% 58,3% 58.3% 56.3°k 58.3% Maximum Green (s} 29,0 31.0 31,0 31.0 31.0 Yellow Time {s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 All-Red Time {sj 1.4 9.0 1,0 1,0 1.0 Losf Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Tohai Losf Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4,0 4.0 l.sad/lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Ex#ensian (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None Max Max Max Max Walk Time {s) 5.0 5,0 5.0 5.d 5,Q Flash Dont Walk (s) 1 i.0 11,0 11.0 1�.0 91.0 Pedestrian Calls (#lhr} 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 9.9 32,6 32.6 32.6 Ac#uated g1C Ratio 0.20 0.65 0.65 0.65 vlc Ratio 0.47 0.25 0.21 0.32 Control Delay 20.0 4.4 �,3 9.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 Total Defay 20.0 4.4 4,3 1.5 - LOS B A A A Approach Delay 20.4 4.4 3,1 Approach LOS B A A Jrntersection Suminary �� Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 60 Acivated Cycle Length: 5U.5 Natural Cycle: 4Q Control Type: Semi Act-Uncoord MaximumvlcRalio:0.47-='::�;-�.<< , ._.,:�.._�,... _, lntersection Signal Del�j�6.6 i,:�.� - Intersectio�L�S: A lntersection Capaciry Ufiliza�Eio�i 42.5°� ,% ECU Level of SeNice A � Analysis Period (min} 15 -. �• - Gulfview Caronado Existing 2014 211412014 EXISiING - PN{ PEAK HOUR Synchro 8 Report RP Page 2 Lanes, Vofumes, Timings 3: 811/2014 �► �, +- !.. \► ,�! lane Configurations ��r T r �rr Volume (vph) 39 228 206 311 335 20 Ideai Flow (vphp!} 1900 1900 1900 9904 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 0,95 0,95 1.00 1.00 0.97 0,95 ped Bike Factar 0.99 0,80 1.40 Frt 0.850 0.992 Fit Protected 0.993 0.955 Safd. Flow {prot) 0 3514 � 863 1583 3415 0 Fft Permiited 0.897 0.955 Safd, �low (perm) 0 3129 1863 �273 3415 0 Right Tum on Red Yes Yes Satd, Flaw (RTOR) 331 86 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 25 Link Qistance (ft) 300 500 300 Travel Time (s} 8.2 13.5 $�2 Confl. Peds. {#mr) 82 $2 �� Peak Nour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0,94 0.94 Adj. Flow (vph) 41 243 219 331 356 21 Shared Lane Traffic (%j l.ane Group Flow (vph) 0 284 219 331 377 0 Enter Blocked lnfersecEion No No iVo No No No Lane Alignmenf Left Left Left Right E.eft Right Med€an Width(ftj a 0 24 Link O�set(ft) 4 0 0 Crosswalk Width(tt} 96 16 16 7wo way Leff Turn Lane Headway Facfor 1.00 9.00 1.00 9.00 1.00 9.00 Turning Speed {mph} 15 9 �� g. Number of Detectors 1 2 2 1 � DetectorTempiate Left Thr� Thru Right Left Leading Defector (ft) 20 10Q 100 20 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 pefector 9 Position{ft) 0 0 0 0 0 �Detector 1 Size(ft} 20 6 6 20 20 Detecfor 1 Type Cl+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex detecfor 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) D.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detec#or 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detec#or 1 Delay (s) 6.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Defector 2 Position{ft) 94 94 Defector 2 Size(ft) � 6 Defector 2 Type CI+Ex C1+Ex Detector 2 Channef Detector 2 Extend (s) 0,6 0.0 Turn Type pm+pt NA NA Perm NA Protected Phases 7 4 8 6 __ Permitted Phases 4 8 Qe#ector Phase 7 4 8 8 6 ' Switch Phase Gulfview Hamden Existing 2094 211412Q14 EXIS7ING PM P�AK HOUR Synchro 8 Report �P Paga 9 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: 81112014 ..! �,. .r-" !. � .� ane:.Group. . ::EBL � E8T '1NBT .WBR'; `SBL SBR. � �':�� PNinlmum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split �s) 8.5 20.0 20.0 20.� 20.0 Total Split (sj 95,0 35,0 20.0 20.0 35A Totaf Split {%) 21.4% 5Q.4% 28.8°/a 28.6% 50.b% Maximum Green (s) 90.5 31.0 16.0 96.0 31.0 YeElow Time (s) 3.5 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Afl-Red Time (s) 9.0 1.0 9.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.a 7o#al Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 l.eadlLag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Exfension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recalf Mode None Min Min Min NoRe Walk Time (s) 5,0 5,0 5.0 5.0 Ffash �ont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedesirian Calls (#Ihr} 0 0 0 0 Acf Effct Green (s) 10.4 10.4 10.4 7.9 � Actuated g/C Ra#io 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.30 v/c RaBa 0.23 0.90 0.47 0.35 Control belay 6.0 6.9 3.4 6.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 O.D 0.0 Totaf Delay 6.0 6,9 3.4 6.8 LOS A A A A Approach Delay 6.0 4.8 6.8 Approach LOS A A A --� -- - - --- -� . - �fnfersection Summary . ',; ;' , .;: ' . : � , ; '` `, . .;; '� Area Type: Other Cycle Lengfh: 70 Acfuafed Cycfe Length: 26.4 . Naiura! Cyde: 50 � Conirol Type: Semi Act-Uncoord Maximam v/c Ratio; 0�-7 -�-�-... ,- Intersectian Signal Delay: 5,7 : Infersection LOS: A Interseciion Capacity Utili�atio'n`41.8°k .. ICU Level of��ervie�"A-----`'I Anafysis Period (min)15 and Phases: 3: Gufiview Hamden Existing 2014 2f14/2Q14 EXIS71iVG PM PEAK HOUR Synchro 8 Report RP Page 2 Two-1Vay Stap Control Page 1 of J. l,U�yuynevu cuvr �uivc��q v� i �vn � . ,.�y.�.., � ............. ...... .........�. ...,. file:///C:/Users/zpergolizzi/AppData/LocallTemp/u2kD4B5.tmp 8/1/2014 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUAflMARY General Information Site In#ormation nal st RP fntersection BAYWAY/PARKWAYDR enc /Co, GCC urisdiction CLEARWi4TER Date PerFormed 8/12/2094 nal sis Year 2074 EXlSTlNG nal sis Time Period PM PERK Pro'ect Descri tion 630 S. GULFVIEWHOTEL EastNVest S#reet: BAYWAY BLVD North/South Street: PARKWAY DRlVE Intersection Orientation: Easf-Wesf Stu Period firs : 0.25 ehic[e Votumes and Ad'ustments a'or Street Eastbound Westboeand ovement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume veh/h 6 78 0 0 29 9 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR � gq 0 0 34 4 �et,m Percent Heav Vehicles 2 -- — 2 -- — Median Type Undlvided RT Channelizec! 0 0 Lanes 0 9 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR stream Si nal 0 0 Minor Street Narthbaund Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 '[2 L T R L T R olume vehlh 18 0 4 0 0 0 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 R.85 Hourly �low Rate, hiFR 21 a q a 0 0 vehm Percent Heav Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade (%} 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 T Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 9 0 0 9 0 Confi uration LTR L7"R Deta Queue Len th, and Level of Service • pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 9 a 9 9 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR v(veh/h) 7 0 25 D C (m) (veh/h) 9572 9504 846 vlc Q.00 0.00 0.03 95% queue length 0.01 0.00 0.09 Control Delay {s/veh) 7.3 7.4 9.4 I,OS A A � �A pproach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 9.�'�,� pproach LOS -- -- A °��, Copyright � 2007 Universiry of Florlda, All Rights Reserved NCS ersi � Generated: 8l12l2014 1,38 PM �*...,_. file:///C:/Users/rpergolizzi/AppData/Local/Temp/u2kF656.tmp 8/12/2014 �,qy �,q �.AB �E � Generalizetl Pe�lc Ho�r' �'wt��Vilay Volumes for Florfda's Urbanfxed Areas� �oi�no S'TATE SIGNALI�ED ARTERiA.L� FREEWA'YS C�ass I(>D.00 ta i.99 ai�atizxi interseofions per m�a) T�� C 1� � � M�� 4 4,000 5,500' 6,770 7,30D 2 L7ndivided 930 3.,500 1600 �`g�` 6 '6,U00 8,320 IQ,150 1I,29Q 4 Dividad . 2,84Q 3,440 3,560 '��* g 8,004 I1,050 13,480 15,2'10 6 �tviaea 4,370 5,200 5,360 �*� l0 10,000 13,960 16,93U I9,250 8 Divided 5,900' 6,970 7,160 ��'� i2 13,730 1$,6fl0 2�.,950 23,230 �'��..t� Gu.1P� aw �,'- t"�r��i�'1. E��Zs FreewayAdjustnmenPs S° z. L.1�7y' Cla5s �I (2.00 to 4��alizad4in�iae�etiosis`�e�'mila) AaxzliazY �P �as Ivfadien B C D. E Laaes ?vletermg 2 i7mdivided '��` : 1,020' 1,480 1,570 _ +1,800 +5% q Divided �'� 2,42a � 3,4d0 � b Divided ��` 3,790 4�$SD 5,150 ��,�,�-p�iD �+'LOW HIGHV4�A'YS S Diviaed ., '��` 5,15� 6,530 6,880 t9 .� a ,°~ z.anes Median B C D E �(..� �oruner.�e �. . � Z�� `?' �� 2 Unclivided 730 1,460 2,080 2,620 t�r Clas5 u77IlI'(� (mnre than 4.50 mfe� c m�e) �� $ �� E 4 Divided 3,22Q 4�650 6�040 b�840 2• Undivided �'y 500 1�1SQ I�A40 6 Divided �4,840 6,990 9,060 10,280 q. Divided �� 1,220 2,730 3,100 Uninterrupted �J.ow Bighwap �idjustzaents 6 Divided •�"� ' 1,910 4,240 4,680 x,� �z� BxclusiYeleftlanos Atijustmantf�otars S Divided '�'� 2,b20 $,770 6,280 2 Airided Yes -�5% Mulfi iJndivzded Yes -59� "�' �at�tr�o ��.��Gr�+��:.r+ �1��°�W1��iE-• Ivla3ti [7ndivided No -2S� Non�ate �zgnaiized RoadwayAdjustments BICYCLE MODE� (Altar aoFrespcmding ststa volum.ea by�iha indioated parceart.) � (Multiply motorized vehirle volimues shovvn below by numbor of directiona! iaadway lanas to deteimina two-way maximum asivi.aa volames,) • MajorCity/CountyRoadways -IO% �� PavadShwlc}er/BieycleT.anr OtherSi.gnalizadRnadwa -3 '�`�"`'�° eoverage B C D E u �c""a"• � 0-4g% ** 310 1,180 >1,184 '�'� S#aLe &�on-5tateSQiugnaT ze ]t�oadwayAc�justments sn-$4�o 240 3b0 >36Q '��* (AIt�correspondiQgstateYolumesbytiieindiaatedpercent) 85-100% 620 >620 �`�`�` *�"� Divided/[lndivided � Turu Lane Adjustmenfs pEDESTR7AN MODEz ffirclusva Exclusive A�justment �� ft�� y�� (Mulflply motarized vehicla vo[umea shown belaw by numbor o£ d'sectional 2 17ividect Yes No -I-S° ' raadway lanes to deEarmina Ewo-way maximum service volusue,v,) � Uadivided No Na -20% Sidewatk Coverage l� C A B Mutti Undivided Yes No -S% 0-44% . �* �`�` 480 1,390 , Ivlulti Undivided No No' -2S% sa-84°!0 ` '�* '�"� 1,100 1,82D ._ - - Yes -l-5% $5-100% �'�` �.,100 1,820 >1,820 One�T�4'ay Facility Ad1nsi�teni BU� MODE (Sc.�ted,ul.ed Figed Roufe)3 4� (Buses in peak havr in peak direotion) z,�,�+�ry �ne �n�oAa;� �wo-a�a�n� �o�,�� rn�g t�ia ty o.6, Sidewalk Caveraga B C D B 0-84°/a >5 � >4 >_3 >2 ' 85-100°/a >4 >3 >2 >l .1 Yelu� shmm ere prosented as hourly twabYay volumes #bt' IaVeis oPaendce md aco Tor ths eu6omo1nldLuck modes unless spaoi5aelly etafeii. A}thaugh pmseutad sa paekhaur hro- way volumes, thaY ac++,�t�; iapxesent pealc hour peak dixcotion oonditiom with aa appltcable D isaWr applied. 'I7�fa table doea mt cbnsdhrte a standbtd end al�ould ba vxd aely fnx g�y� p, nnina appfiaatiuns, The oomputar �dnls &om wl�ioh ifiis fable ia dnrived shauld ba uved for moro apeoific plannin8 appiiwf3m�s. 7La tabla and dedving computar modals strovld not he usod for oomdot w' intaaeation dwigq wlux� more xefinedtaohniquea ea�st. Calculatians �aa besed on plazming appIiaefions of t6e Higfiway Capaa$y Mamiel, BiayaIs. i0S Madal, Pedastrien L09It4odeI e�l7hsncit C�aetty and Qaality ofSarvica Manual.:espaative�y far tha sutomobilahrue&, biaycle, pedes�isa and bus mafos. � I,evel pf semce fvr tha bicyoIe wd pede�(rien modns in tLis tabla ia T�d on number o£motoriud vehicles, ant numbot oE bioyclisffi otpedestrisns u4ing ihe 9cailitq. �Busesprahrnsehownaremlyfattl�epeskhouri¢tbesingledicaotionofthebigherhsffio�mnv. • i5'ouYCe: 9* Cannotbe eahiaved usiug f$ble i�utvalna ae�ulCS. Florida Deparhnent of'I'ransportation •�� Nat applioahle fqr that ie�el o£ socvice leEMr grade. Rac the sutomobiEe mode, volames �w�z fban. Iavel 04 senrice D 5ystems Planning Office bewmo p becau�se intereeaaion oapacilias havs boeu reaohed. For the bicyala mode, the kval of servioe lettar grado (inaluding 605 Suwannee S#�ee� MS 19 T+) lanot achievabie hecaaae tber� ia m maximum veLicIe volnme tTuesholdusing table inp� valuo dn#'avtts. Ta118h29see, FX, 32399-4450 z , .,,,,,�> ��+ �tatP fl u�1au�� in_�Lsystams/sm/los/default.shtm 20D9 FDOT QUAi.IN/LEVEl. O� SERVICE HAN DBOOK ._• r� : �.._._...._ . � ..-----_._..�._-- _........._ .'�°.� � � �� 3� 0� A�e�ag� Vehicle 'trrip �nds vs: Rooms � On a. We�kday Number of S#udies: 10 � • Average Number of Rooms: 476 Directional Distribufiion: 50% entering, 50°/Q exiting Gerr�ra��ion p�r �oom Avei�age Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 8.i7 3.47 - 9.b8 3.38 D�:#a P9og �r�d i8,00C 17,OOC 18,000 15,000 14,000 13,000 � � 12,D00 •� i ],Q00 F- � 10,Od0 � � 9,000 � 8,U00 ti. ¢ 7,000 � c,000 s,aoo 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0 100 200 300 400 500 6QD 700 800 9D0 7000 1100 1206 i30� 1400 1&00 1600 1760 1800 1900 X = Number of Rooms X Actual Data Poirds . Fftied Curve �----- Average Rate Fiftetf Curve Equa�[on: T= 8.95(X) - 373.16 I� - 0.98 Trrp Generatlon, 9th Edition o lnstitufe of iranspotfation Engineers 693 �.: t .:. .....:....,-...r-::... ;:-..:..,....... ..:..��:�.....,' �....:,., . :��:.x . ..:�x .::Y. 4 •�•r�''_ _ '{.. .X s�.YU. � y{'r.: ..i.. .if.t�'.t G`�(��IP� ��c�Q (330} Average V�hicle Yrip ��d� r�s:�, Occupied �o�atms . On a: Weekday, Pea�t Ftour of Adjacen� Stree� Traffic, One hlour iSetwe�n �4 and 6 p.�n� Number of Studies: 10 • • Average Number ofi Occupied Rooms: 429 • ,. Dlrec#ional Distributian: 43% entering, 57% exiting i�ip Gen��atior� p�r Occupi�d IR�oo� 0.49 �aia Plo� and 501 40[ � LI � � 300 m U .0 � � d I� � 200 Q U !-- 100 0 Range of Rates d.27 - 0.72 StancEard Deviation � _— - ; ; . . , ;x � � � '�� . : ; ' y� . . ; . X , ----^--- -•--•---- ._....• --------- -------- -^�------ -x----• -•..... • . �� , ; . , .'� . , . . ,•� ; i� � . . '-"-" ---•-'x. . .....- .�,.X..-"' . '-'-"'- �--•""' � "-'-" . "'-"' . :� �'�' ; X; . ; : .' � �: ; : : ' � >G' . � ' : ; -••--- •s'---• .... . ....... ........� --•-•---�-------- � •------ --..._. .� � � • ' : i00 200 30D 4-00 500 600 � X.� f�urr►ber af Occupled Rooms X AcWal Da[a Potnts Fiifed Curve Equation: Rioi Given 680 Tirp Generation, 9th Edition a InstiEufe ofTrans�rtafion Engineers 0 7UQ 800 900 --""- AverageRafe Rz � **** � � , , High-Rrse Resade�n�iia� Condor�ninium/Townhouse (232) Average Vehicie Trip Ends vs: Dweliing Units On a: Weekday Number of Studies: 4 Avg. Number of Dweliing Units: 543 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting Trip Generration per Dwelling Unit Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation C�� 4.18 � 3.91 - 4.93 2.08 � Data Piot and Equation N � C W a •c F- N U L N � N � ca � m Q I F �,000 s,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0 _ r._.._:..Ir.. . 8.....If Q.� ../e Qi•Jn .,�.,....,.. - „� �....,....., _....... ____.. 190 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 i000 1100 1200 130D 1400 1500 X= Number ot Dwelling Units X Actual Daia Polnts Fitted Curve -"--' Averaga Rate Fitted Currre Equation: T- 3.77(X) + 223.66 Rz � 1.00 �� Trip Generation, 9#h Edition • Institute of Transportation Engtneers 427 H�gh-Rdse Resudentrai Co�dominium/Tovvnhouse � (232} Average Vehicle 'Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units On a: Weekday, Pe�k Haur of Adjacent Street Trafffc, One Hour Beiween 4 and 6 p.m. Number of Studies: 5 Avg. Number of Dweliing Units: 444� Directional Distribution: 62% entering, 38% exiting Trip Generation per Dweilar�g Unit Average Rafe Range of Rates �� 0.3- 8 �, 0.34 - 0.49 Data Plot and soo soo � W400 a H a� U � 300 N � > Q �!! 200 100 � Standard Deviation 0.62 Caufion - Use CarefuJly- Small Sample Size . . . . , , , . , , . : . ,. ; ; : , ; ' ; ; : : ; : ; '-' , . . . , , , . . , , . . ,� ---�-----�-----�-----�----��-----�--�--� ...'-----�-----�-�--- ----:.... ' -'- ' -- , . , , . . , . , , . . ;;� . . , , , , . , . , . , ,,, , .: ; ; ; : ; ; : : : : ;,�' : . , , . , , . , , . , ,, , , ; ; : ; : : : ; ; ; ;,- . ; --- , ----,------ --- - --- ,---- , --- , -- , --- , -�- � ;;- �� - , •-- , --- , -- . ; , , ; ; ; : %� : : : ' . . , , . . . . �' , , . , , ; ' ' ; ' ; : �� ; ; ; ; . , . . . ,, . : ; ; ; . � � . . .�i . . � . -• � --- � ��- r -- � --- � --- --- --�.',- -• . •-- . -•-- -- . --- � --- , .. � � � � � � . . � . � . � � . � . , �� . � � . � . � � . . , . . � . . � � . . � � � � . . . , � � . , . . . ' - ' ' - , ' ' - . - . _ , . . . . , . . . , . . . z . . • ' , • - • , - ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ; ; X ,.,'� ; � ; : ' ; : : ; : ; ; .� ; , , , : ; : ; ' ; ; ; . �., , . , . . . . , , . . )i� . . � � . � � � � , � � . � i . � . � � � � . � . � � � � o �ao 20o soa aoo X Actual Pata Points 500 60D 700 8Q0 900 1000 1100 i200 1300 i400 1500 X= Number �f Dwelling Units Fitted Curve -----� Average Rate Fitted Curve �quatlon: 7 � 0.34(X) + 15.47 Q R2 = 0.99 Trip Generafion, 9th Edition • Institute of Transportation Engineers 429 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: 8/12/2014 r � � 1 � � .�.� .R.. n_..,. ,�.�.�.._ .,� ., �.. .�� aneGrn�jn � = EBL...:EBR NBL. NBT�� SBT„_.,�BR�. .:' .:. ' z. � . a. � �3 ,� .. � { , t l.ane Configuratians �'"� �'�' �'�' � Volume (vph} 358 11 0 843 696 393 Ideal Flow(vphpl) i900 1900 1900 1900 1500 1900 Storage Lengfh (ft) 500 560 5Q0 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 1 Taper l.engfh (ft) 25 25 Lane tltil. Factor 0.97 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.U0 Ped Bike Factor 0.97 a•9� F�( 0.gg6 0.850 Flt Protecfed 0.954 Said. Flow (prof) 3434 0 0 3539 3539 i583 ' Fit Permitfed 0.954 Safd. Flow (perm) 3327 0 0 3539 3539 1502 Right Turn on Red No Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) �32 Link Speed {mph} 20 25 25 Linlc Disiance (ft) 331 260 350 Travel Time (s} 11.3 7.1 9,5 Confi. Peds. (#/hr} 17 33 9 7 Peak Hour Factar Q.99 0.91 0.91 U.91 0.91 0,91 Adj. Flow (vph) 393 12 0 926 765 432 Shared Lane Traffic (%} Lane Group Ffaw (vph) 405 0 0 926 765 432 Enter Bladced Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignmeni Left Right Le� Left Leff Right Median Width(ft) 24 6 0 Link Offset(ft} 0 0 0 Crosswalk Wid1h(ft) 16 16 �6 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Facfor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.QQ Turning Speed (mph} 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 9 2 2 1 Detector Template Left Left Thru Thru Right Leading Qetector (ft) 20 20 100 100 20 Trailing Defecfor (ft) 0 0 0 4 0 Detector 1 Position(ftj 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(f�) 20 20 6 6 20 Detactor 1 Type CI+Ex Ci+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Q,0 0,0 Detector 1 Queue (s} 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 Detecior 7 Delay {sj 0.4 0.0 O.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(fi) 94 94 Detector 2 Size{R) 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex Cf+�x Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s} 0.0 0.0 Turn Type NA Parm NA NA Perm Protected Phases 4 2 6 Gulfview Coronado Fuiure With 630 S Guffview Hotel 8/12/2014 Future with 630 S. Gulfview Hotel Synchro 8 Report RP Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: si� 2�2a� 4 -�' �► � 1 ,L � . ,.T. _.___ �. .. , ,.. �ne Group � _EBL . . ��R. ., NBL. . NB,T,... ;SRT. .�. SBR. � Permiited Phases 2 6 Detecior Phase 4 2 2 6 6 Switct� Phase Minimum IniGal (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4,0 4,0 Ntinimum Split (s} 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20,0 Totaf Split (s) 25.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 Total Split (%) 41.7% 58.3% 58.3% 58,3% 58.3% Maximum Green (s) 21.0 31.0 31,0 31.0 31.0 Yellow 7ime (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjusi (s) 0.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 iotaE Lost 7ime (s) 4,0 4.Q 4.4 4.0 LeadlLag Lead-Lag Opfimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None Max Max Max Max Wa{k Time (s) 5,0 5,0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Flash Dont Walk �s} 11.0 11.0 13.0 11.0 11,0 Pedes#rian Calls (�Ihr) 0 0 0 0 0 Aci �ffct Green (s) 11.1 31.5 39.5 31.5 Actuated gIC Rafio 0.22 0.62 0.62 0.62 vlc Ratio 0,54 0,42 0,35 0.39 ControM Delay 20.1 5.9 5.5 1.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 20,9 5.9 5.5 1.8 LOS C A A A Approach Delay 20.1 5.9 4.2 Approach LOS C A A �nfersection �uirimary . � � �� . Area Type; dther Cycle Length: 60 Actuated Cycle Length: 50.6 Natural Cycle: 40 Control Type: Semi Act-Elncoord Maximum v/c Ratio; 0 5�4-.. � lntersecfion Signal �laX�.7 �.:? �, fntersect�on LOS: A�`'�4 lntersection Capacity Utiliz�to 5.6,0%0�.;;� ]CU Level'ofSeroice-B�--L-�" Analysis Period (min)15 � � Gulfview Coronado Future �th 630 S Gulfview Hotel 8/12/2014 Future wit� 630 S. Gulfview Hote! Synchro 8 Report RP Page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: 8112l2094 t �. .,,� +i'. "-' �, "`� T �" �r' � •� ,...��-.__.__�_-- .�. � .T.�.. -�- -- �� - �.ane:G.roup . EBL EBT EBR WBL :WBT _ WBR� NBL. .;NBT NBR �: S�L�;, r- S�T. .:: SBf� Lane Configurations A'A �' �' � 's � Volume (vph) 43 287 0 0 260 473 19 14 � 508 11 22 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 190d 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 9900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 9.OQ 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Ped Sike �actor 0.99 0,80 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.988 Flt Protected 0,993 0.972 0.950 0,958 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 3594 0 0 9863 1583 0 1811 0 1681 1669 0 Fit Permitted 0.889 0,972 0.950 0.958 SaEd. Flow (perm) 0 3112 0 0 4863 1273 0 9811 0 1681 9669 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 503 6 Link Speed {mph} 25 25 30 25 Linlc Disfance (ft) 300 500 495 300 Travel Time (s) 8.2 13.6 9.4 8.2 Confi. Peds, (#!hr} 82 82 91 Peak Hflur Factor 0.94 0,94 4,92 U,92 0,94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 6.92 0,94 Adj. Flow {vph) 46 305 4 0 277 503 20 15 0 540 92 23 Shared Lane Traffic {%) 47°h Lane Group Flow �vph) 0 351 0 0 277 503 Q 35 0 286 289 0 Enter Blocked Interseciion Na No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Leff Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width{ft) 0 0 12 12 Link Offset(ft} 0 0 a o Crosswalk Widfh(ft) 16 16 96 16 Two way Left Turn Lane HeadwayFactor 1.40 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 1.OU 1.00 1.00 1,00 9.40 1.00 Turning Speed (mph} 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Namberof Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 9 2 1 2 Detector Template Left Thru Left 7hru Right Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft} 20 100 2U 100 20 20 100 20 100 Traifing Detecfor (ftj 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detectar 9 Position(ft} 0 0 0 0 4 U 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex G+Ex Cl+�x CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Ci+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extand (s) Q.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 D.0 O.Q 0.0 O,Q 0.0 Detector 1 Delay {s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft} 6 6 8 6 Detecfor 2 Type C(+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Defecfor 2 Channel Detectar 2 Extend (s) O.Q 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm NA Perm Split NA Spllt NA Protected Phases 7 4 8 2 2 6 6 Permilted Phases 4 8 8 Detector Phase 7 4 8 8 8 2 2 6 6 Switch Phase Gulfview Har�den Future 8/1212014 �uture with 630 S. Guffview Hotel Synchro S Report RP Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: si�2r2a�4 �' -� � � '- '� �r t r� `► 1 � � ,.�. �..�.. �..�. ,�. �. _ .�m,� ane. Group ,;; EBL 4. EBT ::EBR WB�. WaT , . WBR .� :;NBL , : NBT . ::NBR ;; SB�. .:<:. S$�F ,:: �SBf� Niinimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4,0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Splif (s) 8,5 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 10.0 10.0 20.0 26.0 Total Spfit {s} 15.0 35.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 15.0 15.0 20.0 20.0 Totaf Split {%) 21.4°/a 50.0°h 28.6% 28.fi% 28.6% 21.4% 21.4% 28.6% 28.6% Maximum Green (s) 10.5 31.0 16,0 16.0 9fi.0 11.0 11,0 16.0 16.Q YefEow Time (s} 3.5 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3,0 3,0 3.Q AEI-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.Q 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0,4 U.0 0,0 4.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time {s) 4,Q 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 LeadlLag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead-l.ag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension {s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3,0 3,0 3.0 Recall Mode None Min Min Min Min None None None None Wa(k Time (sj 5,0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Ffash Dont Walk (s} 11,0 t1.0 11.0 11.0 11,U 11.4 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#!hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green {s) 12.8 12.8 12,8 6.9 12.9 12.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.98 0.34 0.34 v/c Ra6o 0.34 0,44 0,66 0.11 0.50 0.50 Control Delay 72.1 14.4 6.8 18,6 95.7 15.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0,0 0,0 0.0 6.0 O.d Total Delay 12,1 14.4 6,8 18.6 15.7 15.5 LOS S B A B B B Approach �elay 12.1 9,5 18.6 15.6 Approach LOS B A B B Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 70 Acfuated Cycle Length: 37.9 Natural Cycle: 80 Conirol 7ype: Semi Act-Uncoord Maximum vlc Ratio: O.fG6-••�--� fntersection Signal bela�+:12 2 ,� fnfersection Capaciiy Utiltaation 57��%,�,� Analysis Period (min) 15 ' � y �„ . . .... . _ �.- Intersection I.OS S � �% � �� IC�J Level bf 8ervice �� Gulfview Hamden �uture 8112l2014 Future with 630 S. Guffview Hotel Synchro 8 Report RP Page 2 Two-Way Stop ControI Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY S70P CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site fnformation naf st RP Intersection pRRONAD DR/HRMDEN enc /Co. GCC urisdiction CLEARWATER Date Performed 8/12/14 UTURE W- 630 GULFVIEW nal sis Time Period M Peak nalysis Year OTE Pro'ecf Descri tion �astlWest Street: CORONADO DR NorthlSouth Street: HAMDEN DR1VE Intersection Orieniation: East-West Stud Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Aci'ustments Ma'or Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L 7 R L T R o(ume veh/h 4 484 428 907 Peak-Hour Factor, PNF 0.31 0.91 0.91 0.97 �.99 0.91 Hourly Flow Raie, NFR q 531 0 0 470 917 vehlh Percent Nea Vehicles 9 -- -- 0 -- -- Median T e Two Wa Left Turn [,ane RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 9 D Confi uration LT T 7'R U stream Si nal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 8 10 11 12 L T R L T R oiume vehlh 75 3 Peak-Hour Factor PHF 0.99 �.97 0.99 0.97 0.91 0.91 Hourly Ffow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 0 82 3 veh/ti Percent Neav Vehicles 1 0 1 0 ? 9 Percent Gt~dde (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channefized 0 � Lanes 0 0 0 0 9 0 Confi uration TR Dela Queue Len th and Level of Service pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound SouthE�ound Mv�ement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT TR v (veh/h) 4 85 C (m) (vef�lh) 969 217 Ic 0.00 0.39 95% queue length 0.01 1.75 Control Delay (s/veh) 8.8 31.9 LOS A � D pproach Delay (s/veh) -- -- - 31.9 pproach LOS -- -- �° Coovrioht 0 2007 Universily of Florida, All RtghYs Reserved NCS+TM version s a Generated: 2/ t4-�' 1:5i PM file:///C:/Users/xpergolizz'�/AppData/Local/Temp/u2kD9S4.tnnp 8/J.2/2014 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY ST�P CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information nal st RP Intersection BAYWAY/PARKWRYDR en lCo. GCC urisdiction CLEARWATER ate PerFormed 8/92/2094 nal sis Year FUTURE WlTH PROJECT nal sis Time Period PM PEAK Pro'ect Descri tion 630 S. GULFVIEW HOTEL �ast/West Street: BAYWAY BtVD North/South Street; PARKWAY DRIVE lntersection Orienfation: East-West Stud Period hrs : 0.25 ehicle Vafumes and Ad'ustments Ma"or Sfreet Eastbound Westbound ovement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L 7 R olume veh/h 6 98 Q 0 43 4 Peak-Hour Factor PH� 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly �low Rate, HFR � q�5 0 D 50 4 vehlh Percent Hea Vehicles 2 -- -� 2 -- -- Median Type Undlvided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Confi uration LTR LTR U stream Si nal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 � 8 9 10 11 12 l. T R L T R oluine vehlh 99 0 4 0 0 0 Peak-Hoar Fac#or PHF 0.85 0,85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Fiouriy Flow Rate, HFR 22 0 4 0 0 0 vehlh Percent Heavy Vehides 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percen# Grade (%) 0 0 lared Approach N N Sforage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 9 Q 0 9 0 Confi uration LTR LTR Rela Queue Len th and Levet oi' Service pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR L?"R LTR (veh/h) 7 0 26 0 C (m} {vehlh} 9551 9474 799 v/c 0. DO 0.00 0.03 95% queue length 0.01 0.00 0.10 Controf Delay (s/�eh} 7.3 7.4 9.7 OS A A �A,� pproach Delay (slveh} -- -- 9, 7 pproach LOS -- -- A Copyright � 2007 Universiiy ot Fiorida, Ali Rights Reserved NCS+ '1/, rsion"6.3 Generated: 8N2/2614 1:Aq PM file:///C:/Users/rpergolizzi/AppData/Local/Teinp/u2kCF46.tmp 8/ 12/2014 Two-Way Stop Contzol Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY eneral Information Site Information nal st RP fntersection S. GULFVIEW/DRIVEA en /Co. �CC urlsdiction CLEARWATER Date f'erformed 8/12/2014 nal sis Year FUTURE W1TH PROJECT nal sfs 7ime Period M PEAK Pro ect Descri tion 830 S. GULFVIEW HOTEL East/West Street: 5. GULFVIEW NorthlSouth Street: DRIVEA Infersection orientation; E'ast-Wesf Stud Perlod hrs : 0.25 ehicie Volumes and Ad'ustments Ma or Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume veh/h 14 659 603 7 Peak-Ftour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.90 Hourfy Flow Rate, HFR 15 732 0 0 670 7 veh/h Percent Heav Vehicles 2 -- -- 0 -- -- Median T e Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes D 2 0 0 1 0 Confi uration LT T TR U stream Si nal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume veh/h 9 18 Peak-I�our Factor PHF 1.00 1.00 7.00 0.30 9.00 0.9Q Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Q 0 0 10 0 20 �ehm Percent Heav Vehicles 0 0 0 2 0 2 Percent Grade (°�) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Confi uration LR Defa Queus Len th and Level of Service pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbaund ovement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ane Configuration LT LR (veh/h) 15 30 C (m) (velUh) 911 329 v/c 0.02 0.09 95% queue length �.� 5 0.30 Control Delay {slveh) ,�. 9.0 ?7.0 LOS A�. ` \ "�, pproach Delay (slveh) -- -- 97.R � pproach LOS -- -- Copyright � 2007 University of Florida, All Righls Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.3 Generate . 42/2614 2:16 PM file://IC:/Users/rpergalizz'�/AppData/Locat/Temp/u2kA48F.inip S/12/2014 Two-Way Stop Cont�ol Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CUNTROL SUMMARY General lnformation Site lnformation nal st RP ntersecfion BAYWAY/DRIVEB enc /Co. GCC urisdiction CLEARWATER Date Performed 8/12/2094 al sis Year UTURE WIiH PROJEC7' nal sis Time Period PM PEAK Pro'ect Descri tion 630 S. GULFVIEW HOTEL EastlWest Street: BAYWAY BLVD NorthlSouth Street: DRIVE 8 Intersection Orientation: East-West Stud Period hrs : 0.25 ehicle Volumes and Ad'ustmen#s Ma'or Street Eastbaund Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R l. T R olume veh/h 95 7 7 55 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 9.00 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 9.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR � p.11 g g 64 0 veh/h Percent Heav Vehicies 0 -- -- 2 -- -- Median T pe Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 anes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Confi uration TR LT U sfream Si nal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L 7 R L T R olume vehlh 9 9 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.89 9.00 0.85 9.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR �0 0 10 0 0 0 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 0 0 0 Percant Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channeiized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Confi uraiion LR Dsla Queue Len th, and l.evel of Service pproach Eastbound Westbound Narthbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 19 '[2 Lane Configuration LT LR {veh/h} 8 20 C (m) (veh/h) 1469 857 lc 0.01 0.02 95% queue lengih 0.02 0.07 Control belay (slveh) 7.5 9.3 L.OS A �'A.� pproach Delay {s/veh) -- -- �� 9,3 "`� , pproach LOS -- -- \, A `�� Copyright � 2007 University ot Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS� �Ve ' n 5� Genereted: 8l12/204q 2:23 PM file:///C:/Users/rpergalizzilAppData/Local/Temp/u2k9209.t�np 8/12/2Q14 % At: 630 Gulfview Blvd. S. Clearwater Beach, Florida For: Housh Ghovaee Northside Engineering 300 S Belcher Rd Clearwater, FL 33765 (727) 443-2869 i ��'�'�.r...- Urban Forestry Solutions, llc � �r , �� 4 � � � -� . ` . � �F: 'r ,.�' u��:f��4��;.`�� By: Rick Albee ISA Certified Arborist • 1•••, . A�RBOR3� � � C y� 4 ��,7�'� DATE: March 15, 2015 1 Tree Inventory 630 Gulfview Blvd. S. Clearwater Beach, FL The following report is submitted by Urban Forestry Solutions, LLC, and includes findings that I believe are accurate based on my education, experience and knowledge in the field of Arboriculture. I have no interest personally or financially in this property and my report is factual and unbiased. The following Tree Inventory Report will identify each tree by its size, species and overall condition with accompanying notes justifying the Condition Rating. The Tree Survey indicates the location of the tree on the site by the tree identification number. This tree identification number corresponds to the number on the Tree Inventory Report. Tree Inventory Data A tree inventory is a written record of a tree's condition at the time of inspection. Problems not apparent upon visual observations cannot be noted and were not noted. A tree inventory is also a valuable tool to prioritize tree maintenance and/or removal of trees with problems that could lead to failure and cause personal injury or property damage. The following is an explanation of the data used in the inventory: Tree# - location - Each tree is assigned a number for reference in the inventory that corresponds with a number on the Tree Survey that identifies the location of the tree in the field. Size — Diameter at breast height (DBH) is the size of the tree's trunk measured at 4.5' above grade. If there is a fork in the trunk at that point, the diameter is measured at the narrowest area below the fork. Palm species are measured in feet of clear trunk (C.T.). Species — Each tree is listed by its common and botanical name the first time it is listed in the inventory. For simplicity the tree is listed by its common name thereafter. Condition Rating — The Condition Rating is an assessment of the tree's overall structural strength and systemic health. Elements of structure include: 1) the presence of cavities, decayed wood and/or split, cracked, or rubbing branches etc., 2) branch arrangements and attachments (i.e., well-spaced branches vs. several branches emanating from the same area on the trunk; co-dominant stems vs. single leader trunk; presence of branch collars vs. included bark). Co-dominant Trunk with Included Bark Co-dominant trunk attachments are structural defects that can lead to failure if the bark is included at the base or on the trunk. Some co-dominant attachments can be corrected through structural pruning and ar mechanical bracing. Trees with this potential will be noted. Otherwise these trees will be recommended for removal. Elements of systemic health relate to the tree's overall energy system measured by net photosynthesis (food made) vs. respiration (food used). A tree with good systemic health will have a vascular system that moves water, nutrients and photosynthate around the tree as needed. Indicators of a healthy systemic system used in the overall condition rating include: 1) live crown ratio (the amount of live crown a tree has relative to its mass), 2) crown density (density of the foliage). Poor density typically indicates a declining tree and/or the tree's crown does not have adequate space to develop, generally due to competition from adjacent trees, 3) tip growth (shoot elongation is a sign that the tree is making and storing energy.) The overall condition rating also takes into consideration the species, appearance and any unique features. The rating scale is 0-6 with 0 being a dead tree and 6 a specimen. Increments of 0.5 are used to increase accuracy. Examples of the tree rating system are as follows: 0- A dead tree 1- A tree that is dying, severely declining, hazardous, harboring a communicable disease. A tree with a rating of #1 should be removed as it is beyond treatment and is a threat to cause personal injury or property damage. 2— A tree exhibiting serious structural defects such as: co-dominant stems with included bark at or near the base; large cavities; large areas of decayed wood; extreme crown dieback; cracked/split scaffold branches; etc. Also included is a tree with health issues (low energy, low live crown ratio, serious disease or insect problems, nutritional deficiencies or soil pH problems). A tree with a rating of #2 or 2.5 should be removed unless the problem(s) can be treated. A tree with a#2 Condition Rating will typically require a considerable amount of maintenance to qualify for an upgrade of the Condition Rating. 3- A tree with average structure and systemic health, minor crown dieback and problems that can be corrected with moderate maintenance. A tree with a co-dominant stem not in the basal area that can be subordinated, cabled and braced or a co-dominant stem that will soon have included bark can be included as a#3. A tree with a rating of #3 has average appearance, crown density and live crown ratio and should be preserved if possible. 4- A tree with a rating of #4 has good structure and systemic health with minor problems that can be easily corrected with minor maintenance. The tree should have an attractive appearance and be essentially free of any debilitating disease or insect problem. The tree should also have above average crown density and live crown ratio. Mature trees exhibiting scars, old wounds, small cavities or other problems that are not debilitating can be included in this group particularly if they possess unique form or other aesthetic amenities relating to their age. A tree with a rating of #4 is valuable to the property and should be preserved. 5— A tree with very high live crown ratio and exceptional structure and systemic health and virtually free of insect or disease problems or nutritional deficiencies. A tree in this category should have a balanced crown with exceptional aesthetic amenities. A tree in this category should be of a species that possess characteristics inherent to longevity and withstanding construction impacts. A tree with a#5 rating lends considerable value to the site and should be incorporated into the site design. A tree with a#5 rating is worthy of significant site plan modiiication to ensure its preservation. 6— A specimen tree. A specimen tree is a tree that possesses a combination of superior qualities in regards to systemic health, structural strength, crown density, live crown ratio, form (balanced crown), overall aesthetic appeal, size, species, age and uniqueness. A great effort should be 3 made to preserve a specimen tree including shifting structures that would adversely impact the tree. A specimen tree should have an undisturbed growth area equal to its drip line (equal to the branch spread). Only an experienced and competent International Society of Arboriculture (LS.A.) Certified Arborist should be allowed to perform maintenance work on a specimen tree. TREE INVENTORY REPORT Please note: Trees are living organisms, and with all living organisms, certain degrees of stress may be experienced when they are disturbed in any way. It must be pointed out that it is not humanly possible to entirely ascertain the full extent of stress that the tree may experience. Nor is it possible to assure with 100% probability that the trees will survive. However, with professional arboricultural consulting, it is hoped that the stress factors can be held to a minimum and that the trees will continue to thrive during and following construction. Tree # Size Species Rating 1 8" jacaranda (Jacaranda mimosifolia) 2.5 • Minor tip die-back. • Co-dominant trunk without included bark 3' above grade. 2 19" live oak (Quercus virgiana) 3.5 • Co-dominant trunk without included bark 6' above grade. 3 11' CT Cabbage Palm, (Sabel palmetto) 3.5 4 14" live oak 4.0 5 22" live oak 3.5 • Co-dominant trunk without included bark 7' above grade. 6 27' CT Washington palm 4.0 7 11" schefflera (Schefflera actinophylla) 3.0 • Compromised root system, parking lot to the west and stump to the north. 8 16' CT Queen Palm (Syagrus romanzoffiana) 2.0 • Severe trunk restriction. � Chlorotic crown. 9 13' CT Queen palm 2.5 4 • Chlorotic crown. 10 14' CT Queen palm 2.0 • Severe trunk decay 3' above grade. • Severe trunk restriction. • Note: Tree is not shown on the survey. 11 21' CT Queen palm 3.0 • Note: Tree is not shown on the survey. 12 12' CT Canary Island date palm (Phoenix canariensis) 4.0 • Note: Tree is not shown on the survey. 13 33' CT Washington palm 3.5 • Minor bark erosion. • Note: Tree is not shown on the survey. 14 . 36' CT Washington palm 3.5 • Note: Tree is not shown on the survey. 15 7" pony#ail palm 3.5 • Despite its common name, it is not closely related to the true palms. • Note: Tree is not shown on the survey. 16 16' CT Queen palm 3.0 • Note: Tree is not shown on the survey. 17 27' CT Queen palm 3.5 � Note: Tree is not shown on the survey. 18 24' CT Queen palm 3.5 • Note: Tree is not shown on the survey. 19 10" avocado (Persea americana) 3.0 • Severe root restrictions. • Note: Tree is not shown on the survey. 5 20 42' CT Washington palm 4.0 • Corrected lean to the south. • Note: Tree is not shown on the survey. 21 21' CT royal palm (Roystonea spp) 4.5 22 18' CT royal palm 23 36' CT Washington palm • Note: Tree is not shown on the survey. 24 33' CT Washington palm • Note: Tree is not shown on the survey. 25 39' CT Washington palm • Note: Tree is not shown on the survey. 26 42' CT Washington palm • Note: Tree is not shown on the survey. 27 16' CT Queen palm • Chlorotic crown. • Severe trunk restriction. • Note: Tree is not shown on the survey. 28 18' CT Washington palm • Note: Tree is not shown on the survey. 29 21' CT royal palm 30 10' CT royal palm • Minor trunk restriction. 31 10' CT royal palm 32 11' CT Queen palm 3.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 � 3.5 4.0 3.0 2.5 2.0 0 • Severe trunk restriction. • Chlorotic crown. • Note: Tree is not shown on the survey. 33 14' CT Cabbage palm � Note: Tree is not shown on the survey. 34 21" schefflera • Restricted root zone. • Note: Tree is not shown on the survey. 35 13' CT Queen palm • Note: Tree is not shown on the survey. 36 27' CT Queen palm • Note: Tree is not shown on the survey. 37 15' CT Queen palm Note: Tree is not shown on the survey. 38 17' CT Queen palm • Note: Tree is not shown on the survey. 39 19' CT Queen palm • Minor trunk restrictions. • Note: Tree is not shown on the survey. 40 20' CT Washington palm • Note: Tree is not shown on the survey. 41 15' CT Queen palm • Restricted canopy. • Note: Tree is not shown on the survey. 42 33' CT Washington palm 3.5 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.5 3.0 2.5 4.0 2.5 4.0 7 • Note: Tree is not shown on the survey. 43 36' CT Washington palm 4.0 • Note: Tree is not shown on the survey. 44 22" Cuban laurel (Ficus retusa) 2.0 • Severe restricted root zone. 45 10' CT cabbage palm 3.0 46 10' CT Queen palm 2.5 • Note: Tree is not shown on the survey. 47 15' CT Washington palm 1.5 • Severe trunk restriction. • Chlorotic. • Note: Tree is not shown on the survey. 48 17" Cuban laurel 2.0 • Severe root restrictions. • Girdling roots. • Note: Tree is not shown on the survey. 49 14' CT Queen palm 1.5 � Severe trunk restriction. • Chlorotic. • Note: Tree is not shown on the survey. 50 39' CT Washington palm 4.0 • Note: Tree is not shown on the survey. 51 16' CT Queen palm 3.0 • Note: Tree is not shown on the survey. 52 39' CT Washington palm 3.5 � • Note: Tree is not shown on the survey. 53 36' CT Washington palm 4.0 • Note: Tree is not shown on the survey. 54 42' CT Washington palm 4.0 • Note: Tree is not shown on the survey. 55 30' CT Washington palm 3.0 56 27' CT Washington palm 2.5 57 30' CT Washington palm 2.0 58 30' CT Washington palm 2.5 • Severe bark erosion impacting the core of the trunk. 59 45' CT Washington palm 2.5 60 30' CT Washington palm 3.0 • One foot from the sidewalk. 61 33' CT Washington palm 2.5 • Severe bark erosion impacting the core of the trunk. 62 27' CT Washington palm 3.0 • The adjacent driveway and sidewalk will make this tree difficult to transplant. 63 27' CT Washington palm 2.5 • Large basal wound. 64 33' CT Washington paim 3.0 • This tree is in a 4' wide strip. 65 27' CT Washington palm 2.0 � Large wound on the base on the East side. 66 45' CT Washington palm 3.0 0 • This tree is in a 4' wide strip. 67 21' CT Washington palm 3.5 • Transplantable. 68 51' CT Washington palm 2.0 • Decay present with insect frass on the East side. • Trunk is split. 69 48' CT Washington palm 2.5 • Decay present with insect frass on the South and East sides. 70 36' CT Washington palm 2.5 • Decay present on the lower trunk. 71 30' CT Washington palm 2.5 • Decay present on the lower trunk. 72 33' CT Washington palm 3.0 • Transplantable. 73 33' CT Washington palm 3.0 • The curb is 1' to the East. � Transplantable. 74 33' CT Washington palm 3.5 • Transplantabie. 75 30' CT Washington palm 4.0 • Transplantable. 76 45' CT Washington palm 2.5 • Decay present on the lower trunk. • Large cavity about just under the bud. 77 36' CT Washington palm 2.5 10 • Decay present on the lower trunk. 78 33' CT Washington palm 3.5 • This tree is close to the overhead wires. • Transplantable, use caution. 79 33' CT Washington palm 3.0 • Minor decay on the trunk on the South side. • This tree is in a 3.5' wide strip. • This tree is close to the overhead wires. • Transplantable, use caution. 80 54' CT Washington palm 2.5 • Severe decay present on the lower trunk. 81 30' CT Washington palm 3.0 • This tree is close to the overhead wires. • Transplantable, use caution. 82 36' CT Washington palm 3.0 • Minor trunk restrictions. • Bend in the trunk. • The curb is 1' to the West. • Transplantable. 83 30' CT Washington palm 2.5 • Severe bark erosion impacting the core of the trunk. 84 33' CT Washington palm 2.5 • Severe decay present on the lower trunk on the East side. 85 39' CT Washington palm 2.5 86 24' CT Washington palm 2.0 • Large wound on the base on the West side. 87 45' CT Washington palm 2.5 11 • This tree is in a 3.0' wide strip. 88 21' CT fox tail palm (Wodyetia bifurcate) 3.5 • This tree is close to the overhead wires. • Transplantable, use caution. 89 21' CT fox tail palm 3.0 • This tree is close to the overhead wires. • Wound present on the crown shaft. • Transplantable, use caution. 90 21' CT fox tai) palm 3.5 • This tree is close to the overhead wires. • Transplantable, use caution. 91 51' CT Washington palm 2.5 • Minor decay on the trunk on the North side. 92 51' CT Washington palm 2.5 • Transplantable, use caution. 93 36' CT Washington palm 3.0 • This tree is close to the overhead wires. • The adjacent driveway, sidewalk and underground cables will make this tree difficult to transplant. 94 45' CT Washington palm 2.5 • Decay present on the lower trunk. 95 42' CT Washington palm 3.0 • This tree is close to the overhead wires. • Transplantable, use caution. 96 54' CT Washington palm 2.5 • Decay present on the lower trunk. 12 97 57' CT Washington palm 2.5 • Decay present on the lower trunk. 98 48' CT Washington palm 2•5 99 48' CT Washington palm 3.0 • This tree is close to the overhead wires. • Transplantable, use caution. 100 51' CT Washington palm 3.0 • Minor trunk restrictions. • This tree is close to the overhead wires. • Transplantable, use caution. 101 30' CT Washington palm 3.0 • This tree is close to the overhead wires. • Transplantable, use caution. 102 51' CT Washington palm 3.0 • This tree is close to the overhead wires. • Transplantable, use caution. 103 51' CT Washington palm 3.0 • This tree is close to the overhead wires. • Transplantable, use caution. 104 42' CT Washington palm 4.0 105 39' CT Washington palm 3.5 • Trees 104 and 105 are growing in close proximity to each other and the adjacent seawall to allow for a sufficient root ball. • They are not recommended for transplanting. 13 10:30 AM Case number: Owner(s): Applicant: Representative: FLD2015-02004 -- 630 S GULFVIEW BLVD Elias Anastasopoulos 1600 Gulf Blvd # Phno 1 Clearwater, FL 33767-2973 PHONE: 7274619300, Fax: No fax, Email: No email Elias Anastasopoulos 1600 Gulf Blvd # Phno 1 Clearwater, FL 33767-2973 PHONE: 7274619300, Fax: No fax, Email: No email Brian Aungst 625 Court Strreet Clearwater, FL 33756 PHONE: 7274418966, Fax: No fax, Email: Bja@macfar.Com a double frontage lot bound by South Gulfview Boulevard on the Location• south and Bayway Boulevard on the north approximately 240 feet ' east of the intersection of South Gulfview Boulevard and Bayway Boulevard. Atlas Page: Zoning District: 285A Tourist Request: Flexible Development approval to permit a 159-room overnight accommodation use in the Tourist (T) District with a lot area of 1.192 acres, a lot width of 280 feet, a front (south) setback of zero feet (to pavement) and 15 feet (to building), a front (north) setback of zero feet (to building and pavement), side (east) setback of 12 feet (to building and pavement) and a side (west) setback of 12 feet (to building) and eight feet (to pavement), a building height of 100 feet and a minimum of 191 parking spaces at 1.2 parking spaces per hotel room, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of CDC Section 2-803.D; eliminate or reduce the required foundation plantings along the front (north and south) fa�ades of the proposed building as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of CDC Section 3- 1202.G; and a two-year Development Order under the provisions of CDC Section 4-407. Response: Request has been changed addressing an Overnight Proposed Use: Neighborhood Association(s): Presenter: Accommodation use, not a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project use. See revised Narrative for revised Request. Overnight Accomodations Clearwater Beach Association Mark Parry, Planner III The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: Engineering Review Prior to Building Permit: Please provide information on the staging area and route for the construction materials and equipment. **SEE PAGE 50 ON DOCUMENT. Response: Acknowledged. Will address with building permit submission. Engineering Prior to Building Permit: Review Applicant shall bring all sub-standard sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project up to standard, including A.D.A. standards (raised detectable tactile surfaces or truncated domes per FDOT Indices #304 and #310). **SEE PAGE 50 ON DOCUMENT. Response: Acknowledged. Will address with building permit submission. Engineering Prior to Building Permit: Review Please apply for a right-of-way permit for any work within Gulfview Boulevard and Bayway Boulevard. The form can be found online at: <http://myclearwater.com/gov/depts/pwa/engin/FormsApplications.asp> **SEE PAGE 50 ON DOCUMENT. Response: Acknowledged. Will address with building permit submission. Engineering Prior to Building Permit: Review Please make the finished floor elevations consistent on all sheets. **SEE PAGE 50 ON DOCUMENT. Engineering Review Engineering Response: Acknowledged. Will address with building permit submission. Prior to Building Permit: Restoration of City roadways shall meet city standards. **SEE PAGE 50 ON DOCUMENT. Response: Acknowledged. Will address with building permit submission. Prior to C.O.: Review If any easements are vacated or created, they shall be recorded with the city prior to Certificate of Occupancy. **SEE PAGE 50 ON DOCUMENT. Response: Acknowledged. May be a condition of approval in DO. Engineering Prior to CDB: Review Please show the existing drainage easement on the plans. **SEE PAGE 50 ON DOCUMENT. Response: See revised survey and civil plans. Engineering Prior to Building Permit: Review Fire lines and potable water lines shall be separate taps on the water main. **SEE PAGE 52 ON DOCUMENT. Response: Acknowledged. Will address with building permit submission. Engineering Prior to Building Permit: Review As per City of Clearwater Reclaimed Water System Ordinances, 32.351, and 32.376, use of potable water for irrigation is prohibited; the irrigation system shall be hooked up to the reclaimed water system that is available to this site. **SEE PAGE 52 ON DOCUMENT. Response: Acknowledged. Will address with building permit submission. Engineering Prior to Building Permit: Review Please provide the following notes to the plans: - All utilities shall be cut and capped prior to demolition. The Wastewater Supervisor shall be notified. - All existing utilities shall be protected during demolition. - Demolition shall not cause any service interruptions for other utility customers. - Water meters, double-detector checks and backflow preventers are owned by the City of Clearwater. The City shall remove and retain these items. **SEE PAGE 52 ON DOCUMENT. Response: Acknowledged. Will address with building permit submission. Engineering General Conditions: Review - If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy the site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. Response: Acknowledged. - Sheets C 1.1-05.1 were reviewed for General Engineering criteria. The additional details provided in the plan set may have been necessary for other departmental reviews to provide flexible development approval. Construction details shall be reviewed more thoroughly prior to receipt of the building permit. Response: Acknowledged. - DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit review. Additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. **SEE PAGE 47 ON DOCUMENT. Response: Acknowledged. 3 Environmental Prior to issuance of Building Permit: Review Based on the height of building, light may be visible from sea turtle nesting areas. Provide evidence that (1) the lighting from the building will not be visible during the nesting season (May 1 to October 31) or (2) that sea turtle-friendly lighting is used. Additional information is found on Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's website including specific lighting guidelines (http://myfwc.com/media/418417/SeaTurtle_LightingGuidelines.pd�. **SEE PAGE 29 ON DOCUMENT. Response: Acknowledged. Will address with building permit submission. Environmental Prior to issuance of Building Permit: Review An Asbestos Survey is usually required prior to conducting any demolition or renovations. Contact Pinellas County Air Quality (727/464-4422) for more information. ** SEE PAGE 49 ON DOCUMENT. Response: Acknowledged. Will address with building permit submission. Environmental Prior to issuance of Building Permit: Review Provide complete erosion control measures on plan sheets (including construction entrance and inlet protection) and provide notes detailing erosion methods. ** SEE PAGE 49 ON DOCUMENT. Response: Acknowledged. Will address with building permit submission. Environmental Prior to issuance of Building Permit: Review Provide stormwater vault specifications showing the vault provides water quality benefits and provide a vault maintenance schedule that has been signed and accepted by the owner. **SEE PAGE 50 ON DOCUMENT. Response: Acknowledged. Will address with building permit submission. Environmental General Notes: Review DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Response: Acknowledged. Offsite discharge of produced groundwater from dewatering shall comply with dewatering guidelines from Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), F.A.C. 62-621(2). Response: Acknowledged. Additional permits from State agencies, such as the Southwest Florida Water Management District or Florida Department of Environmental Protection, may be required. Approval does not relieve the applicant from the requirements to obtain all other required permits and authorizations. ** SEE PAGE 1 ON DOCUMENT. Response: Acknowledged. 4 Fire Review An automatic Class I standpipe system with a Fire Pump is required. 100psi at roof is required. Fire Pump to be located above BFE provide PRIOR TO CDB **SEE PAGE 167 ON DOCUMENT. Response: See revised architectural plans. Fire Review Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, they shall be installed, completed and in service prior to construction as per NFPA-241. All underground fire lines must be installed by a contractor with a class I, II or V license with separate plans and permit. Please acknowledge prior to CDB. **SEE PAGE 167 ON DOCUMENT. Response: Acknowledged. Fire Review Tamper switches are required to be installed on the fire supply DDCV and must be connected to the FACP. ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO CDB. **SEE PAGE 167 ON DOCUMENT. Response: Acknowledged. Fire Review Shall meet the requirements of NFPA 1 2012 edition chapter 16 sections 16.3.4.5 Stairs and 16.3.5 Standpipes, respectively. ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO CDB. **SEE PAGE 167 ON DOCUMENT. Response: Acknowledged. Fire Review Must Comply with Ordinance of the City of Clearwater No. 47.053 Radio System Regulations for buildings, install 911 Radio Repeater / Antenna Booster System. ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO C.D.B. **SEE PAGE 167 ON DOCUMENT. Response: Acknowledged. If required after testing. Fire Review This building is determined to meet the criteria of a High Rise Building as defined by the Florida Fire Prevention Code Sth Edition, therefore the requirements of a High Rise structure must be met. These requirements include, but are not limited to Fire Code items such as: Fire Pump and generator if pump is electric, sprinkler system throughout with control valve and water flow device on each floor, Class I Standpipe System, Fire Alarm using voice/alarm communication, Central Fire Control Station, firefighter phone system, Emergency lighting, and Standby Power as per NFPA 70, Pressurized Stairwells, Stairwell marking and Elevator Lobbies. ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO C.D.B. **SEE PAGE 167 ON DOCUMENT. Response: Acknowledged. Fire Review Additional FDC required far this building. Shall meet the requirement of NFPA 14 2010 edition chapter 7 section 7.12 Fire Department Connections. Please acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB. **SEE PAGE 167 ON DOCUMENT. Response: Acknowledged. Fire Review FDC shall be located no closer than 25 feet and no further than 50 feet from the supporting fire hydrant. Please acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB. **SEE PAGE 167 ON DOCUMENT. Response: Acknowledged. Fire Review 5 Fire Review Must Comply with Ordinance of the City of Clearwater No. 47.053 Radio System Regulations for buildings, install 911 Radio Repeater / Antenna Booster System. ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO CDB **SEE PAGE 52 ON DOCUMENT. Response: Acknowledged. If required after testing. Fire Review This building is determined to meet the criteria of a High Rise Building as defined by the Florida Fire Prevention Code Sth Edition, therefore the requirements of a High Rise structure must be met. These requirements include, but are not limited to Fire Code items such as: Fire Pump and generator if pump is electric, sprinkler system throughout with control valve and water flow device on each floor, Class I Standpipe System, Fire Alarm using voice/alarm communication, Central Fire Control Station, firefighter phone system, Emergency lighting, and Standby Power as per NFPA 70, Pressurized Stairwells, Stairwell marking and Elevator Lobbies. ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO C.D.B. **SEE PAGE 52 ON DOCUMENT. Response: Acknowledged. Fire Review FDC shall be located no closer than 25 feet and no further than 50 feet from the supporting fire hydrant. Please acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB. **SEE PAGE 52 ON DOCUMENT. Response: Acknowledged. Fire Review Additional FDC required for this building. Shall meet the requirement of NFPA 14 2010 edition chapter 7 section 7.12 Fire Department Connections. Please acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB. **SEE PAGE 52 ON DOCUMENT. Response: Acknowledged. Fire Review Shall meet the requirements of NFPA 1 2012 edition chapter 16 sections 16.3.4.5 Stairs and 16.3.5 Standpipes, respectively. ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO CDB. **SEE PAGE 52 ON DOCUMENT. Response: Acknowledged. Fire Review Tamper switches are required to be installed on the fire supply DDCV and must be connected to the FACP. ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO CDB. **SEE PAGE 52 ON DOCUMENT. Response: Acknowledged. Fire Review Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, they shall be installed, completed and in service prior to construction as per NFPA-241. All underground fire lines must be installed by a contractor with a class I, II or V license with separate plans and permit. Please acknowledge prior to CDB. **SEE PAGE 52 ON DOCUMENT. Response: Acknowledged. Land Resource DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, prior to issuance of a Review building permit any and all performance based erosion and sedimentation control measures must be approved by Environmental and or Stormwater Engineering, be installed properly, and inspected. ** SEE PAGE 49 ON DOCUMENT. Response: Acknowledged. Land Resource NOTE: Additional comments may be forthcoming based on the response to the Review above conditions. **SEE PAGE 49 ON DOCUMENT. Response: Acknowledged. Land Resource Prior to Building Permit: Review Provide a spread sheet expressing the total number of trees to be removed, calculating the DBH of all trees being removed with a rating of 3 and above and the total proposed inches. Note: palm trees with 10' of clear trunk receive a 1" deficit if removed and a 1" credit if proposed and accent trees receive a 2" deficit if removed and a 2" credit if proposed. **SEE PAGE 49 ON DOCUMENT. Response: Acknowledged. Will address with building permit submission. Land Resource Prior to Building permit: Review The landscape plan does not show sizes and quantities. From the renderings it appears that an excess of Palms are being used. While this is the beach and you can use Palms to meet your required shade tree equivalents up to 75%. Please clarify landscape plan. **SEE PAGE 49 ON DOCUMENT. Response: Acknowledged. Will address with building permit submission. Land Resource Prior to D.O.: Review Tag all trees on the site and show the numbers coinciding on tree survey and tree inventory. The existing tree survey is missing trees that were present on the site and shows some that do not need to be shown. Correct the tree survey to reflect what is actually located on the site. **SEE PAGE 49 ON DOCUMENT. Response: See revised plans. Land Resource Code section 4-202 A l l.aa. requires a tree inventory to be prepared by a Review certified arborist reflecting the size, canopy, and condition of such trees. Once this data is received a thorough review can be conducted. At such time comments can be generated which may require modifications to the plans. No review will be performed until the inventory is received. Provide prior to D.O. ** SEE PAGE 49 ON DOCUMENT. Response: A tree inventory has been submitted. Land Resource Prior to Building Permit: Review Provide a Tree Preservation Plan prepared by a certified arborist. This plan must show how the proposed building, parking, Stormwater, irrigation and utilities impact the critical root zones (drip lines) of trees to be preserved and how you propose to address these impacts i.e.; crown elevating, root pruning and/or root aeration systems. Other data required on this plan must show the trees canopy line, actual tree barricade limits (2/3 of the drip line and/or in the root prune lines if required), and the tree barricade detail. And any other pertinent 7 information relating to tree preservation. Provide prior to building permit. **SEE PAGE 49 ON DOCUMENT. Response: Acknowledged. Will address with building permit submission. Parks Review Open space/recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Debbie Reid at 727-562- 4818 to calculate the assessment. **SEE PAGE 81 ON DOCUMENT. Response: Acknowledged. Planning General: Do you have an estimate on how many net new jobs may be created Review with the proposal? **SEE PAGE 2 ON DOCUMENT. Response: It is anticipated to generate approximately 100 new jobs. See revised Narrative. Planning Application page 2 of 8: The building footprint is listed as 17,305 sq.ft. where Review the Design Guidelines narrative provides that the floor plate above 45 feet is 23,070 square feet. Clarify and correct. **SEE PAGE 2 ON DOCUMENT. Response: Square footage numbers have been revised. Planning Narrative (Height): Let's leave the height as 100 feet and skip the overall height Review listing of 104 feet. I think it confuses the issue. Mechanical equipment can extend up to an additional 16 feet as a matter of minimum development standards with no special consideration needed. While we're on the topic of height. Let's make sure we're all on the same page in that while roof top occupancy is permitted be aware that the definition of height includes this provision: Structures permanently affixed to the roof that accommodate rooftop occupancy shall only be permitted if within the maximum allowable height. Please clarify/confirm that the proposal adheres to this requirement. **SEE PAGE 11 ON DOCUMENT. Response: The building height will be 100 feet to the highest roof deck of Level 10. Any roofed structures on the pool deck area on Level 10 will comply with this 100-foot maximum. Planning Narrative (Solid Waste): Clarify exactly where the staging area is located. Show Review this on your site plans, too. ** SEE PAGE 12 ON DOCUMENT. Response: As discussed with Solid Waste personnel at the DRC meeting, the staging area will be inside the building and trash truck personnel will move the dumpsters to and from this staging area to the truck for disposal. The Narrative has been revised to reflect this dumpster staging location. Planning CIRP Criterion 1: No comments. **SEE PAGE 12 ON DOCUMENT. Review Response: Acknowledged, however, application will now respond to criteria for Overnight Accommodation uses under CDB Section 2-803.J. Planning CIRP Criterion 2: We probably should remove the reference to Comp. Plan E3 Review FLUE Policy A.3.2.1. **SEE PAGE 13 ON DOCUMENT. Response: Acknowledged, however, application will now respond to criteria for Overnight Accommodation uses under CDB Section 2-803.J. Planning CIRP Criteria 3 through 6: No comments. **SEE PAGE 13 ON DOCUMENT. Review Response: Acknowledged, however, application will now respond to criteria for Overnight Accommodation uses under CDB Section 2-803.J. Planning BBD C.2: Please provide a site plan sheet which shows all building planes Review dimensioned to illustrate the fact that (1) no plane extends for more than 100 feet (which is shown nicely on the elevation sheets, actually) and (2) that offsets of at least five feet are provided. ** SEE PAGE 15 ON DOCUMENT. Response: See revised architectural plans for dimensions. Planning BBD C.3: Provide the actual percentages of window/architectural decoration Review coverage. **SEE PAGE 15 ON DOCUMENT. Response: See revised architectural plans for percentages. Planning BBD E.1: With regard to the fa�ade treatment along the north fa�ade of the Review building, I think we need some additional clarification as to how this criterion is being met by the proposal. I'm not sure the treatments portrayed in the elevations or the landscape plan fulfills this criterion. **SEE PAGE 17 ON DOCUMENT. Response: See revised architectural plans for fa�ade treatments along north fa�ade. The fa�ade uses metal grillwork and false recessed windows. Planning BBD E.3: Can we have an enlarged perspective of the entrances along the south Review facade on the building - I think that would fairly well address this criterion. **SEE PAGE 17 ON DOCUMENT. Response: See revised architectural plans for enlarged perspectives. Planning BBD E.4: This criterion was not specifically addressed in the narrative. Clarify Review if awnings or overhangs are being incorporated into the design. It would probably make sense to provide some covering along the south fa�ade perhaps at the entrances of the storefronts and the lobby. ** SEE PAGE 17 ON DOCUMENT. Response: No awnings are shown. Awnings are recommended, not required. Planning Gen. App. Criteria 1 through 5: No comments. ** SEE PAGE 19 ON Review DOCUMENT. Response: Acknowledged. Planning Gen. App. Criterion 6: Clarify how the pool location will be buffered from Review adjacent residential uses. **SEE PAGE 20 ON DOCUMENT. Response: See revised response to Criterion 6 regarding the pool. Pool is located on Level 10. Planning Sheet A 100: Please provide a dimension between the dumpster area and the Review property line. **SEE PAGE 30 ON DOCUMENT. Response: See revised architectural plans. Planning Sheet A100: Clarify exactly how solid waste will access the dumpster area. � Review **SEE PAGE 30 ON DOCUMENT. Response: As discussed at the DRC meeting, dumpster storage room overhead door will be open on trash pickup days to allow Solid Waste truck personnel to roll dumpsters to truck for dumping and then return to dumpster storage room. Planning Sheet A100: Clarify that the fit and iinish of the dumpster enclosure will match Review the building. Please provide details including materials and color. **SEE PAGE 30 ON DOCUMENT. Response: See revised architectural plan elevations (rolling overhead door). Planning Sheet A100: Clarify what the item is at the southwest corner of the site - it Review appeaxs to be part of the bike rack feature. Provide a dimension to the site (west) property line for this feature). **SEE PAGE 30 ON DOCUMENT. Response: Actual bike rack and bench locations are shown on the civil site plans (those shown on Sheet A100 do not reflect the actual design locations). Planning Sheet A100: Clarify how deliveries will be accommodated. **SEE PAGE 30 Review ON DOCUMENT. Response: A designated delivery area has been designated within the Bayway Boulevard right-of-way adjacent to the ingress driveway near the northeast corner of the site/building. Planning Sheet A 100: Please provide a different paving material or pattern where Review driveways cross sidewalks. **SEE PAGE 30 ON DOCUMENT. Response: Pavers are provided and labeled at all vehicular driveways on South Gulfview Boulevard and Bayway Boulevard (see civil site plans for greater clarity for paver locations). Planning Sheet A100: The parking spaces are numbered 1 through 25 and then 28 and 29. Review Where are spaces 26 and 27? This is probably not a huge concern as I count a total of 243 parking spaces where 191 spaces are required but I'd like to make sure we're as accurate as possible. In addition, please provide some dimensions for parking spaces and drive aisles on this and Sheet A102. **SEE PAGE 30 ON DOCUMENT. Response: Parking sheets have been updated and dimensioned. Parking counts have been revised. Planning Sheet A100: This sheet differs slightly with regard to the sheets provided by Review Northside Engineering Sheets LS1.1, C5.1, C3.1, C4.1 with regard to the parking layout at the northeast corner of the site. Please clarify and coordinate these sheets. **SEE PAGE 30 ON DOCUMENT. Response: Parking layout has been coordinated. Planning Sheet A102: There is a row of spaces at the northeast corner of the building Review labeled as having 10 spaces but I count eight. Please correct and clarify. **SEE PAGE 31 ON DOCUMENT. Response: All parking has been updated. Planning Sheet A103: I'd like to see some dimensions (north, south, east and west) placed Review on the stepbacks at the fifth floor to better illustrate how far back the tower portion of the building is setback from property lines. **SEE PAGE 32 ON DOCUMENT. 10 Response: See revised architectural plans for stepback dimensions. Planning Sheet A106: Clarify what the uses are on this sheet - I assume this is all hotel Review rooms. Clarify what the green areas are. In addition, the title is "Guest Level 7th/9�' Floor". Should it be "7th - 9t" Floor" or is there something different going on the 8th floor and that sheet is missing? Am I correct when I say that there is no l Ot" floor - that the lOt" floor is just the open rooftop patio/pool, restaurant areas? With that said, the roof top restaurant - clarify what's enclosed and what's not - is it all open air? Same thing with the gym and corridor - let's get some footprints shown. **SEE PAGE 34 ON DOCUMENT. Response: Renamed Floors 7-9. Roof deck is called out. Planning Sheet A400: I think the streets are mislabeled. Please have another look and Review correct. ** SEE PAGE 3 8 ON DOCUMENT. Response: This has been corrected. Planning Sheet A800: Let's remove any exterior accessory space from the calculation. Review Also, let's remove things that the general public won't use such as exercise room, laundry facilities and the like (if you haven't removed them already from the calcs). Less the rooftop area I'm coming up with about 13,656 sq.ft. of accessory which is around 9% based on a building area of 151,151 sq.ft. (assuming that area does not include the parking areas, stairwells and elevator shafts). **SEE PAGE 46 ON DOCUMENT. Response: Based on our meeting with Mark Parry and Joe Burdette on Monday, March 2, 2015, our GFA for the hotel is to be 151,449 sf (excluding vertical circulation and parking), with the accessory uses to be 15,092 sf, such that the accessory uses are 9.9% of the GFA. Planning Sheet LS 1.1: I can't see how a live oak is going to do well in a twelve foot Review space - this is only asking for trouble within a few years. Let's swap these out for something more appropriate. **SEE PAGE 53 ON DOCUMENT. Response: Agreed. Landscape plan has been revised. Planning Sheet LS 1.1: Remove any sod that isn't involved with stormwater and replace Review with appropriate groundcover. **SEE PAGE 53 ON DOCUMENT. Response: See revised landscape plan. Planning Sheet LS1.1: I'd like to rethink the landscape along Gulfview. I think we're Review missing some great opportunities to soften up this space - especially the area just to the west of the driveway. **SEE PAGE 53 ON DOCUMENT. Response: See revised landscape plan. Planning Sheet LS 1.1: Pm not really sure there is enough room for date palms where Review you've placed them. **SEE PAGE 53 ON DOCUMENT. Response: See revised landscape plan. Planning Sheet LS 1.1: Think there are opportunities to do something a bit more Review interesting along the north side of the site rather than flax lily and jasmine. **SEE PAGE 53 ON DOCUMENT. Response: See revised landscape plan. Planning Please note that additional comments may be generated at or subsequent to the 11 Review DRC meeting based on responses to DRC comments. Please carefully review the listed request. It is ultimately the responsibly of the applicant to ensure that the request reflects what is wanted. In order to be reviewed by the CDB on Apri121, 2015 15 sets (revised as needed) must be submitted no later than noon March 13, 2015. **SEE PAGE 88 ON DOCUMENT. Planning Review Response: Request has been revised. Acknowledged. Sheet A300: the bottom elevation doesn't have a label - I assume it's the west elevation but I'd like to know for sure. **SEE PAGE 36 ON DOCUMENT. Response: Label has been added. Solid Waste Discussion on level of service and how garbage will be collected from property. Review Keep in mind at hotels generate a lot of solid waste and multiple 4 yard Dumpsters will be needed. Also most of the hotel chains are going for green certification and need to show provisions for recycling. Please show this. Response: Acknowledged. There was a discussion at the DRC meeting regarding pickup of trash and staging location of dumpsters. Stormwater Prior to issuance of Building Permit Review Provide control structure detail. ** SEE PAGE 51 ON DOCUMENT. Response: Acknowledged. Will address with building permit submission. Stormwater Prior to issuance of Building Permit Review Show on drainage sheet proposed connection to City's storm system, 15 inch RCP required. **SEE PAGE 51 ON DOCUMENT. Response: Acknowledged. Will address with building permit submission. Stormwater Prior to issuance of Building Permit Review A topographical survey extending 50 feet beyond property boundary is required and is to be shown on drainage sheet. **SEE PAGE 51 ON DOCUMENT. Response: Acknowledged. Will address with building permit submission. Stormwater Prior to issuance of Building Permit Review Call out all roof drains on drainage sheet and ensure flow is directed to storm pond ** SEE PAGE 51 ON DOCUMENT. Response: Acknowledged. Will address with building permit submission. Stormwater General Comments Review DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review. Additional comments 12 Stormwater Review Stormwater Review Traffic Review Traffic Review Traffic Review may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. ** SEE PAGE 51 ON DOCUMENT. Response: Acknowledged. Prior to issuance of Building Permit Stormwater sheet flow should be directed towards stormwater management system for treatment. ** SEE PAGE 51 ON DOCUMENT. Response: Acknowledged. Will address with building permit submission. Prior to issuance of Building Permit Please provide a detail which shows a dimensioned cross section of each stormwater vault. **SEE PAGE 51 ON DOCUMENT. Response: Acknowledged. Will address with building permit submission. General Note(s): - Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule which shall be paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy. The TIF amount for the proposed hotel with credit(s) is $236,698.87 Response: Acknowledged. -DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. **SEE PAGE 3 ON DOCUMENT. Response: Acknowledged. Prior to CDB: - The 70 degree angled parking shall be to the City's design standards. The length of the stall shall be a minimum of 20' with a drive aisle width of 19'. (City's Community Development Code, Section 3-1402) Response: See revised architectural plans. - Provide typical parking dimension on the architectural drawing including the angle of the parking stall in degrees. **SEE PAGE 31 ON DOCUMENT. Response: See revised architectural plans. Prior to a Building Permit: -The minimum clear height throughout the garage shall be seven feet zero inches and shall be eight feet two inches for van-accessible parking spaces including ingress and egress drive aisles to these spaces. Response: Acknowledged. Will address with building permit submission. - Pedestrian - vehicular conflicts shall be avoided whenever possible. Where 13 unavoidable, active warning devices such as traffic signals or flashing warning signs/devices and/or physical barriers such as vehicular actuated gates shall be provided to warn the pedestrian and slow vehicular traffic. Response: Acknowledged. Will address with building permit submission. -Lighting levels in parking garages having public access shall meet or exceed the current minimum Illuminating Engineering Society (IES) standards. Response: Acknowledged. Will address with building permit submission. - All electrical conduits, pipes, downspouts, columns or other features that could be subject to impact from vehicular traffic shall be protected from impact damage with pipe guards or similar measures. Measures used for protection shall not encroach into any parking space. Response: Acknowledged. Will address with building permit submission. - Provide "do not enter" and "wrong way" signs where appropriate per current MUTCD standards. Response: Acknowledged. Will address with building permit submission. - Provide stop signs with stop bars where appropriate per current MUTCD standards. ** SEE PAGE 31 ON DOCUMENT. Response: Acknowledged. Will address with building permit submission. Traffic Prior to CDB: Review - Provide a turning template for a scaled 19' long passenger vehicle entering and exiting the parking garage. Response: See revised civil plans. -Show 20' x 20' sight visibility triangles at all driveway connections. There shall be no objects in the sight triangle which do not meet the City's acceptable vertical height criteria at a level between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade.(City's Community Development Code, Section 3-904). Response: Visibility triangles have been shown on architectural, civil and landscape plans. - Remove the marked parallel parking spaces along Bayway Blvd. Response: Civil plans are revised to show existing paxallel parking revised along Bayway Boulevard based on the proposed site plan. - Provide marked directional pavement arrow and lines at all entrances, exits, aisles, approach lanes and maneuvering areas to ensure the smooth and safe flow of traffic. (City's Community Development Code, Section 3-1410. A.) Response: See revised civil plans. - The 60 degree angle parking space(s) are not to City design standard. The minimum length of the 60 degree parking stall is 20.5' not 15.5' as shown on 14 3/2/2015 the site plan. (City's Community Development Code, Section 3-1402) Response: We meet the requirements of Division 14 for valet parking for an overnight accommodation use, which may be 8.5' wide by 16' deep stalls. The revised plans have been dimensioned. - On both the civil and architectural parking tables, show and provide 7 accessible parking spaces based on the ratio of 201 - 300 parking spaces required to serve the new use. (City's Community Development Code, Section 3-1409.) Response: A minimum of 7 handicap parking spaces have been provided, located on all levels of the structured parking. - The civil and architectural site plan do not reflect each other. Response: Plans have been coordinated. - Will the parking garage have a gate or access control equipment? If so then the stacking distance from face of gate or access control and back edge of sidewalk shall be 40'. (City's Community Development Code, Section 3-1402 I.8.) Response: As discussed at the DRC meeting, there will be no gate or access control equipment. - Parking space dimensions shall be revised where necessary to provide safe and efficient vehicular movement where columns, walls, or other site conditions impeded maneuverability or vision. ( City's Development Code Section, 3-1402 A.) Response: Plans have been revised accordingly to provide necessary dimensions. Development Code, Section 3-1402 I.8. **SEE PAGE 50 ON DOCUMENT. 15 DRC_Comments � M _r. .,. .. .. � � . .�e�ir,<�.�pw�.��.: .} ; . _�., � � ., ,�„�.�,. �,�� j ,. � E � � 1 �� ' � `� "� �,� ;�� t, �~ � � �i� � "' �-'_ �i: I` ' � a r , � � " �I ',r�i i { , „ � � � � r � _ � �' � � >if. � f �^��";�' � � f� �. I � '" i 'iI , t , ;,.�<�-_ _�.,.� _=�� i � 1 i' - - I i ""� '( �' r � ,_�� b �5 `� ...t r. Tw. �" :. �� .. ''a° � htiv.;.�3x� ��; - � � T` � V 5"�" btr " ' F m�,.. �� ^ ��.. �, s� �� — == ��,� �� ': � yx"Y�"=� �� ,.��'`' �`..� �' � �,��'�.� k$ ° �...., � , bi Y , ..ti n South Elevation 1/1� G _ Level i__1 � io�m o° v _ Level i_ 0 n —g7 -�I _ _Level9 n 87 -�7 Level S 77' _ 0': � '''� .. _ _Level7 .� Ir 67' _ 0' I� Le�vel6 � 57' - 0" V _ _Leve15 � 47 0 � �� _ _Lc�E » � 3� � � — __ —L,� , S� tl 2b � 1.3,¢� .. ... : � 2 i �� — — �,.-� � ` a �, }f � 4 R ` , °+Y �i � � k .. . . n WestElevation 1/1�_ _ Levelll__n 107' _ 0.. v noo.eW� e�Er Level 10 n 97' _ 0" V _ Level 9 _� 87, _ �,� V Leve18 n 77' - OZI _ Level7 n 6�, �° V _._ _ __Level6 � 57' - 0" _ _ Level5 � 47' - 0" Level4 n 36' - 0" V Level 3 26� - �° Level 2 -- - 16._0„�� 1� erel Levell n 0 � �,,,...,, .,- �� , . - � .'� : � . � � ,� � � �� , 1 •+��IIIIIf� Revision Schetlule Dascno�ion � Da�e � i L � � r-+ i (� � � i � : � ; U� � M � M � m J Ll.. � � U (6 q !n m V � x � € (+') � � � dll� a or<h'�.recrs e # w.tll�war<hilecf�.com � ..,r�... ....�., .ve � DESIGNED NJ DRAWN NJ APPROVED o�w EDIT DATE 482015 2:1727 PM ISSUE DATE 03I13I2015 SCALE 1H6' = 7'-0' JOBNUMBER 74177 SHEETNAME ELEVATIONS SHEETNUMBER A300 � °-� � East Elevatlon U 1/16" = 1'_0„ zas .,,• � _.. _ , .., ��. 1-�_'. '.. �-i ., � ' ' :� . �S��d�� I E � � � � �a�� _=� �� _ ��` � ; s � }- �� , t �� .� � .:r�fir.a .�'��.� = 7 ` . �'_ 's . i -� �� ii � � � - i, ., �.. . .. _, , , . . .i+��,r �...#�r.. - -.i . ,r� �tk.� t � �� ' � - z s ' _ — <_ . �: -- - . .,�..., . .. �_;,� ,, �: .. ¥3fj v'�'�k� �v •_t v�t�rs*A,i e , �..mr ,! � _:. - '� ,,..'., :,., � , ,. .�.. . . — � ` :�. ', ., .. ...�.� ..:".'.� _ ' � . . _. � , �. : .. � __ .,yp� . - —'...�a.,. -. - . _. ,. -- — —=a,. -a . __ . _ � ,.� p� „ — . _ —. — _ — -- -- � ,e... -�f €' -- ^'^ � . �,,, .,. ... M .� I nvwl 1'I � Level 11 n �o�, _ p„ � _ Leve110 n 97' 0„ V _ _Level__9 n 87, - 0" V _ _Level.. 8 /� 77' .�I _ _Level� 67'-0 _ _Level 6 �� 57'-0 � Leval 6 � � 47' C� �1 � _ _Level4 ,t�� 36'-C '1 — —Level3.� ��.. 26'-C Level2 � . . � , . ..� � . .� 31{� d.. � 'i . � ° . �" � Tx I� -C t , �?al�`��, . .' � r� .,t. fE � .�,�� `. � .. � ��''�� .-�—'°7 _„ � —��',�` :.._____._�._ i � ,� n�� in ., � . +-.ro. . � . ., =- v .._ , - ,. � . . _., _..- ,�. . �� .,� � 1� ��: -�.ia Ph.'?�"`j t r+±v r -. ^ ......__— — _ _— 37' - 0" I 41' - 8" � North Elevation 'I/16�, _ � �_Q�� $r.i � � _,.. Revision Schetluk Deacrivtian Date L � �-+ � � � Q% � U c� _ r� � M � M � J � � U � � � � � m � O M � � dll� a r c n t e t w.a.. � nH � ne n, DESIGNE� KJ DRAWN '��,,.,,,, :,,= .� .� ♦ � �. ♦ � �� ,�� '•'��sii//��1 1� EDIT DATE MeR015 2:1227 RA ISSUE DATE OJI132015 SCALE i116" =1•-0" JOBNUMBER iain SHEETNAME ELEVNTIONS SHEET NUMBER A301 Pr� r�%; i�r � � r Street View of S. Gulf Blvd looking East SVeet View of Entryh S. GulNiew Blvd looking West - Night Illumination s - _ t�� _ �� . � �� .. - II �, �� N-�---- . � � � r , � i. Aerial View of S Guliview Blvd � it — � Re��ro� sdKe,� e 1I � w � • � II �II � U� i � M i .II > M m � :II � � � U � m � I � O M � � I� �� dll� o<<� e�„ �.�..:�m�9A� ��e�� ,o� ��.oe DES�— I KJ DR4WN NJ APPROVED DLW EDIT DATE �. 0.0R015 247�.50 PM � � � . � A 9t � ➢i1� 1.]�� k � � _ -- •� �, EF9PKETNE3 GMULFVI � ` ° ^. e. u�= � ' _ . � : .... s : ' �+ ! .._��_�-_ ._ � _ rr P - EW - ' ' ��,_ r .. � ' ,� � � _ � � . � _— SHEETNUMBER ; y+. ' .. . ,� ., —^—. .,�.. _ � . i ,I i .':, �_ , ` � _�..; _ _ � � , _ . , . n , .. A500 - --�,W'�'�-,,, - ��OF F�pR ,�p''� �'/O y : .9 ;OP�� vA�LACE R �:. _ * _ A�'. ARa3�<5 �U M �,�.. , � � , ��`'� Illuminated Night View of S Gulfview Blvd �� ''AR�a - Street View Entry of S Gulfview Blvd looking West . . � � < 0 m � � a ,� � � m a � m < m "'�� 1 � ��- _ s ��=�` �.�. { .. _..... .,...,,..d � .. . ;�j��IIIIII/ � �F� D rg � � m T. y N � t� � ^,\ � .� _ �.� ° � � � «.a�. � .� W � � �,$ < � � �� ` � . � � � ��il ��I! � �� x m n `9��iYtt • ` . . � a � �'!� �1ti#4$}',$i �� /� � �� s'��`,i � � �(� ��,�� .��;� ;� � sqsi,� � � ;t. � is� li��°°` ':? � si@ t�s t i: ` '' .. �,' �, .� ��:.�I �� D m d < rv £ 0 d� � f � n � �' � ro ! �� 1 �� . .. . , � ..r :,. . ,.L,.. � y . + t . � ��... . � � C�� y �� . r� !} � y re. � y@3#t � y � �, �3�� ; ,;�r"� s,.�5� �: a ; § � `� s`T�?� r � . �� - � � � � � : t _� S ��E' g �� '9-�� .. . -- .� �� . .+ .' ��.... . � . . c . ,``t.v�� ?t� �� . .� '+�r�. .��:,R u.v�mo.�a�i,r:..�.��w�a � ..� om.,xi�.a�o..,..,,M..,..<r.,r.e.�..,�.e_.,�.�m�...,.�.n<.� v� �,.aa. . .x.�....oT. M R.�M1.,.�, ..n....r,z.,.�..a..�.�.,:rne_..�_.�<�a.a�..� �.�x �..�.. .�,.n Ig��3b...'o ..s>9 � . ... , `� i°�TT � m ym W N o� �o o� o g�� 630 S. Gulfview Blvd., Clearwater p m �. m; s :� o � N= � m D Nn e➢ ��£�_ : Beach, FL 33767 r� 3 D ^ � �,5;. r" .�0 � �� m�m O p m�q>> L..; 'T .' a �� m " _ m A 3 _, L �p�,T.. ....d .. _-- I �--- - -- Cy,9'� ,... .. ... � � ' :� ' I _ � r . r Nchiteciunl Penels Colw - — SW 7566 WeslhiehlanE Whlle lvclvtMUral Paneh Gola - SW 6496 Lakeshore .. ... � �. .�1 -. �.` _�L�_.. �Y'�`_9� _-"A � � ��' F t l � �� ,'`f .. ,,, I .. ArchXecNrd GrN/Saeen Gda- SW 7566 WeclhigWand Whrte =� -1—� ArchrtecWral GrIIlS reen - _ � y� Cola - SW 6990 Lakeshore . �2 � �, k. �:. n � ,. I , srv _ 3 Buildin Facde - Soulh - GulNiew Blvd 3/64., = 1�-0„ Mch�eciural Paneh Cobr- SW �566 WesthigMand Whi�e Nc�uedural Paneh Color- SW 6494 LakesM�e Nchuecfural Grill/Screen Cobr- SW 7566 West�igNend WNte ,�, i Q-� �� _t� _� 4B'- 3" � 4 Buildin Fawde - North - Ba Blvd 3/64�� _ �._0�� lvchtMUral Panels Cobr - � SW 7566 Westhighland Whi1e I � Gchiteciural Panels Color - SW 6994 Lakeshore .... .� .. — ' ° :" �: i � , �. � �,, 71%TRFNSPARENTGLASS � `, � i � �� ` : � 26%ARGHITECTURAL 7 GRILL I REVEAL � ` �"` ,r'�� I , � � zsxsouonacnirECruwu (� I : :' DECORATNEPANELS k � � I — 26%SOLIDARCHITECTURAL ' �� . � -�� ..I PANELS � + I � OPENBEVONO ! � _ �.� �� 1;� ..�.s.i " . — �. � 74°6 COVERED WITH WINDOWS �i��l �L /�'', �f�' i� ' �. I 11 , . .; � �. _ � �N��A �I � ��N� . ._ = �.i- .. .,. I,�,t„..,�.,"..�T.,; ....,_«. ,� _ � . ..... '�,'� : _ - .:--��.. �� =� � �-� �� .-� = - � _ = � _� i■■■��■��ri��l��I( ,A .y _ i�� 93'-T' 27' - 9" fi' - 5.. �� e., il 9� 3. I �. �.. I 95, �.. I. �: '�#I !ll�il,�N'./!� �N� .��'�. ��!E�� !�� ''!?�i I� �r��i�� ir IliiiiEii �� P� �� '�'�.��.��;� �:, „d,� � �� ;� �:-sa�� .� -- . , r . - : �—= r i � �� , �— . . x�nr��^• . _ �s.._ =_r ^:�s �.��r� n -- 3p• y. 19. 0' _2 - 1 J' �- . 3 � -..��._. . �L.__ .- � ► . � . � � y t " ' y� * yv � .� , `�*t �..� *t pr{� C i l ? . '. r .. �, L � �} IP7"t�` Q�A qf �y!''� f � � R �."�'Si.r R� � 3� � � �i;+w;i G ` � � � � R ��j� �� '� �� Tl E �A.t' � " � ��,� . �{ Theore6cal Building Envelope �� , Parcel Boundry x Building Height � 5,745,646 cu.ft. � ��• MASS STUDY _ I � Archreaural Grilll5creen 1 ' � Gobr SW 669a . Lakeshore � I�„ ; ` ; � u� r�- : �- � 17%TRANSPARENTGlA55 — 21%ARCHITEGTURAL �- GRILLIREVEAL gg 23% SOLID ARGHITECTURlLL ¢� DECORATNEPANELS 39°b SOLID ARCHITECTURAL PANELS OPENBEVOND- VEHICULAR ACCE55 61 % COVERED WITH WIN W WS OR ARCHITECTURAL DETAIL ]e% TRANSPARENT AT STREET LEVELFACADE — _ � rz '. _ �.. �� -- ArchitMVal Pariels Cdor � SW 649I Lakeshwe Arcli hclural Grii / Screen Cobr- SW �566 WeatYi ghlantl Whee aonne� SW 755 Mchitec Cdor - Weslhg lvchite� sW�� ' ^` ��":�i>� ,� .. 3 � � � / ��`,�*'i;;' ��} �..,.. . �� .�.� {,', � ,.. _ �- >., � .. r�t. _ � - . i � � ��,- ( � �� , �� I ,�r.'� °�"(S $ ,. "� ;. �4„ �� / i t ° Actual Building EnvNope � �'i � 2,202,392 cu.ft. � Buildin Facade - West 3/64„ _ ��_�„ Revition SchedJe p� � 23%TRANSFARENTGLA55 � � ��_ 16% ARCHITECTURAL GRILI / REVEA� — � . 28%SOLIDARCHITEGTURAL NchrteccuralPanekCdor- OECOR4TNEPANELS ' SW7`.+fi6Wes11rgHaMVJhAe --� �%SOLIDARCHITECTURAL � PANELS t � � 67% COVERE� WITH IMNDOWS E . . _ _ OR ARCHITECTURAL DETAIL Li r � �_.�_ j� I i, � ' . , �.-:a= � ,�....�� , - 2 Buildin Facade - East 3/64„ _ ��_�„ f , -4 � G ai ` � �+ 19%TRANSPARENTGLASS (� � 18%ARCHRECTURAL � ORILL I REVEAL ' ■Z/%SOLIDARCMITEGTl1RAL k � DECORArIVE PANELS � 36°650LIDARCHITECTUR4L ; I U � PANELS M 6A% GOVERED WITH WINDOWS � M OR ARCHITECTURAL �ETHIL � J � �..�.. � � l� � � L/ � I V/ t" O'^ W tql� � � .—� a , ,; �t.r ! .. ...,...... . � a /x. .�.I �.. � , f' kf,Y;..,� �' � I, r �'�. � ,. a�. � . S t„ Rp y � �"��„$ �.- `��- hs �1, . � �^� .., ��. � - Combined Building Envelopes 38% Used Building Volume 38 %< 66 % maximum allowed volume dil� Ofch�.i0Cf5 www.e1wa.�nn.�fa.com DESIGNEO Oes9^er DRAWN Aullior APPROVED Wpwar EDIT DATE NBR0152�.1<'a3 PM issue vnrE oarzv�s SGALE ��._,.-0. JOBNUMBER 16717 SMEETNAME BEACH BY �E31GN FACSPDE STWV SHEETNUMBER A600 ��OF F�pR �P. .. ... i0 �i! .. v��a .9 .:OP�,O-'* Ce H �:. Fm�': an�;�,-:c ��- �U �.. � s�R�.AR�;t,�