Loading...
FLD2015-02006' 1� 7 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD y '� � �� ���� _ ��.. PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT `` STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: CASE: REQUEST: April 21, 2015 F.2. FLD2015-02006 Flexible Development approval to permit a 98-room overnight accommodation use in the Tourist (T) District with a total lot area of 36,161 square feet (0.831 acre) (28,688 square feet [0.659 acre] zoned Tourist District and 7,473 square feet [0.172 acre] zoned Low Medium Density Residential District), a lot width of 174.05 feet, a front (south) setback of 15.08 feet (to building) and zero feet (to sidewalk), a side (west) setback of 10 feet (to building) and five feet (to sidewalk), a rear (north) setback of 40.12 feet (to building) and 4.16 feet (to patio decking), a building height of 100 feet (to top of flat roof deck) and 118 parking spaces at 1.2 spaces per room, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project pursuant to CDC Section 2-803.D; and a two-year Development Order pursuant to CDC Section 4-407. GENERAL DATA: Agent ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... Michael J. Palmer, P.E.; Synergy Civil Engineering, Inc. Applicant/ Owner ... .......... Decade Sea Captain, LLC. Location .......................... 40 Devon Drive; 0.831 acres located on the north side of Devon Drive approximately 150 feet east of Coronado Drive. Property Size .................... 0.831 acres Future Land Use Plan...... Resort Facilities High (RFH) Zoning ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... . Special Area Plan.......... Adjacent Zoning.... North. South: East West Existing Land Use...... Tourist (T) District Beach by Design (Small Motel District) Preservation (P) District Tourist (T) and Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) Districts Preservation (P) District Tourist (T) District Overnight Accommodations Proposed Land Use... ... ... Overnight Accommodations (98 units) with associated accessory uses including restaurant and exercise room available only to hotel guests. � Cl��l ►r �l�l Level II Flexible Develo ment A lication Review PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT p pp DEVELOPMENTREVffiWDIVISION " :-�� � �� t>....., ANALYSIS: Location and Existing Conditions: The total 0.831 acre parcel is located on the north side of Devon Drive, approximately 150 feet east of Coronado Drive. The subject property is currently developed with a 27-room motel. The subject site has approximately 175 feet of frontage along Devon Drive. The majority of the subject property (0.659 acre) is zoned Tourist (T) District, but the eastern portion (0.172 acre) of the subject property, north of the adjacent detached dwelling at 94 Devon Drive, is zoned Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District and is not part of Beach by Design. Parking for the existing motel is primarily located within the LMDR zoned area. There are 10 existing boat slips associated with the existing hotel. The property to the west and southwest at 101 Coronado Drive is currently developed with a 108-room 89-foot hotel (Pier House 60) approved by the Community Development Board (CDB) on May 19, 2009 (FLD2009- 03013/DVA2009-00001). The property on the west side of Coronado Drive (100 Coronado Drive) has been approved for a 450-room hotel (Wyndham Grand – FLD2008-05013/DVA2008- 00001) at a height of 150 feet (to top of roof deck). The hotel site is currently under construction. There exists, across Devon Drive, a 25-space City parking lot (FLD2005-08089). Other overnight accommodation uses exist to the south of the subject property in the block between Coronado and Devon/Hamden Drives. Additionally, the Aqualea/Hyatt overnight accommodation project, attached dwellings and public parking garage is located to the southwest at 301 S. Gulfview Boulevard. Properties to the south on the east side of Devon Drive are zoned LMDR District, are not part of Beach by Design and are developed with detached dwellings. Clearwater Harbor exists to the north and east of the subject property, developed with the City marina. 0 � :� � < 0 � rj �v / � m a W r � LL � z ?� o q I �' �1 v° z. � OS/R :as t Y`s$� ScG ._._ _. _. _. o; CAUSEWAY PROJECT SITE CLEAR iVATER HARBOR LOCATION MAP ..�� ' I �,i I � i _ -- - . � _ __ �_ ;.____ � i—_____------- ;�. � - _ _ , � - � r i� : r . ' -_i...,;, �.... ,__ _T_ � u ; �, 14 1 � �I Ia.�_— io T a' 1 �� o !- ,:,� , _._ � � ; , _ i�� � � � , � � �% _ ei � ,� „ ' , � ; �; ECONtigT � � -__ 1_..� ; — i / � � �,. ZONING MAP Clearwater Beach and parking � � �- DEVON DR CLEARWATER � HARBOR N.T.S � � , + � * ..�., , .b� '�. _ ! �' � J�i , Overnight �� �o% r Accommodations o :� � ------ , - -�a-ssw�s*t�se+� � i94 � h � � �' 98 � Overnight ` ztz i �Y o Zf5 Accommodations ' o �'�harc � Detached '� , � z�r ��3 Dwellinas � z�s s��oivv s r �,. �- - _ , EXISTING SURROUNDING USES MAP Community Development Board — April 21, 2015 FLD20l 4-12034 — Page 1 '_ vA�ai ��L�l Level II Flexible Develo ment A lication Review PLnrrrr�rrG & nEVELOrMENr p pp DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION ' _��_���. �. Site History: ➢ On December 21, 2010, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved, with 18 conditions, Case No. FLD2010-08004 to permit an 85-unit overnight accommodation use in the Tourist (T) District with a front (south) setback of 6.2 feet (to building) and 8.5 feet (to pavement), a side (west) setback of five feet (to building) and zero feet (to sidewalk), a rear (north) setback of 18.5 feet (to building) and zero feet (to patio decking), a building height of 75.25 feet (to top of roof deck) and 93 parking spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of CDC Section 2-803.C, and approval of a two- year development order; and (2) increase the permitted density by the allocation of 53 overnight accommodation units from the Hotel Density Reserve created pursuant to Beach by Design. ➢ On May 21, 2013, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved, with 17 conditions, Case No. FLD2013-02007 to permit an 85-unit overnight accommodation use in the Tourist (T) District with a front (south) setback of 6.2 feet (to building) and 8.5 feet (to pavement), a side (west) setback of five feet (to building) and zero feet (to sidewalk), a rear (north) setback of 18.5 feet (to building), a building height of 75.25 feet (to top of roof deck) and 93 parking spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of CDC Section 2-803.D, and approval of a two-year development order; and (2) increase the permitted density by the allocation of 53 overnight accommodation units from the Hotel Density Reserve created pursuant to Beach by Design. ➢ On January 13, 2011, the City Council approved the allocation of up to 53 units from the Hotel Density Reserve under Beach by Design (Case No. DVA2010-08001) and adopted a resolution to the same effect (Res. No. 11-01). The owners proposed to develop the site with an 85-unit overnight accommodations use related to case FLD2010-08004. ➢ On June 19, 2013, the City Council approved the allocation of up to 53 units from the Hotel Density Reserve under Beach by Design (Case No. DVA2010-08001A) and adopted a resolution to the same effect (Res. No. 13-06). The owners proposed to develop the site with an 85-unit overnight accommodations use related to case FLD2013-02007. ➢ On October 15, 2014, the City Council approved the allocation of up to 66 units from the Hotel Density Reserve under Beach by Design (Case No. HDA2014-07004) and adopted a resolution to the same effect (Res. No. 14-32) The owners propose to develop the site with a 98-unit overnight accommodations use related to case FLD2015-02006. The two FLD cases have expired. The site plan and elevations included in the current proposal are consistent with those submitted with Case No. HDA2414-07004. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no active Code Compliance cases for the subject property. Development Proposal: The proposal is to demolish all structures on the site and redevelop the site with a 98-unit overnight accommodation use at a density of 148.7 rooms/acre (based on only the lot acreage Community Development Board — Apri121, 2015 FLD2014-12034 — Page 2 } Cll.t�tl 1't�L�i Level II Flexible Develo ment A lication Review PL��G&DEVELOPMENT p pp DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION ��..,.�._ - zoned T District), which includes the allocation of 66 units from the Hotel Density Reserve under Beach by Design. The 98-room hotel is proposed on total lot acreage of 0.831 acres, however, the east 0.17 acre portion of the site is zoned LMDR District (not part of Beach by Design). The proposed site design locates the building, pool/pool deck and all other hardscape improvements on that portion zoned T District. The eastern portion of the site zoned LMDR District is proposed for only open space and the retention pond. The hotel is proposed at a height of 100 feet from Base Flood Elevation (BFE) to the flat roof deck. Driveway access is from Devon Drive. The ground level of the hotel provides 29 parking spaces. The second floor provides 33 parking spaces and nine guest rooms. The third floor provides 34 parking spaces and nine guest rooms. The fourth floor provides for 24 parking spaces and nine guest rooms. The fifth floor provides the lobby, pool and pool deck, kitchen, dining area, exercise room, administration office and laundry room. The sixth through ninth floors provide 17 guest rooms on each floor as well as housekeeping and vending machines areas. All parking garage levels will be open for natural ventilation. Balconies are provided for guest rooms on all sides of the hotel building. The exterior base and body colors of the building will be primarily Dover White and Accessible Beige. An existing masonry wall along the west property line is intended to be retained, although a portion is partially on the adjacent parcel, which will require an easement from the adjacent property owner. The proposal includes a front (south) setback of 15.08 feet (to building) and zero feet (to pavement), a side (west) setback of 10 feet (to building) and five feet (to sidewalk), a rear (north) setback of 40.12 feet (to building) and 4.16 feet (to patio decking). All areas within the front setback provided will be landscaped to enhance the site and building. Existing docks on the north side of the site will be retained for guests of the hotel. The applicant is requesting a two-year development order due to market conditions. Section 4- 407 specifies that an application for a building permit must be submitted within one year of the date the CDB approves the project, unless otherwise specified under this approval. Special Area Plan: Beach bv Desi�n: Small Motel District: The City has demonstrated through the creation of Beach by Design and subsequent amendments to this plan that it recognizes the need for pedestrian-friendly development in order to create a vibrant active resort and waterfront destination serving tourists and locals alike. It is understood that a broad range of uses including retail sales and service, hotels and motels and restaurants contribute to the creation of the unique character and atmosphere that is Clearwater Beach. The Small Motel District of Beach by Design recognizes that existing improvements in the District do not represent the theoretical "highest and best" use of the area. This development would further the trend of quality redevelopment and/or improvements of properties within the general area including the Wyndham Grand and Pier House 60. Beach bv Design: Section VII. Design Guidelines: Beach by Design provides that the implementation of the document involves more than community redevelopment initiatives, it also involves private development and redevelopment that conforms to design objectives and principles established in Beach by Design. These Community Development Board — April 21, 20 ] 5 FLD2014-12034 — Page 3 ' lil�al ►'YLtl�l Level II Flexible Development Application Review PL�NG&nEVELOrMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION + .... ;.: '�..s..._�- =' �� . objectives and principles will help the City promote safety, encourage cleanliness, and provide a comfortable environment. It should be noted that any issue not addressed in the Design Guidelines shall be governed by the requirements of the CDC. Furthermore, the Design Guidelines are intended to be administered in a flexible manner to achieve the highest quality built environment for Clearwater Beach. Section A specifically addresses the issue of density. In short, Beach by Design supports an increase in density through Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) andJor allocation of units from the Hotel Density Reserve. The proposal includes 98 overnight accommodation units including 66 units allocated from the Reserve. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this provision Section B specifically addresses height and floor plate area and is delineated in three subsections. Section B.1 provides that a height of up to 150 feet may be permitted where additional density is allocated to the development either by TDRs, or via the Destination Resort Density Pool pursuant to the CRD designation, or via the Hotel Density Reserve where the subject property is located between South Gulfview Boulevard and the Gulf of Mexico or on the west side of Coronado Drive. Otherwise, height is governed by the specific Beach by Design district or, lacking such direction, the CDC. The proposal provides for a building 100 feet in height as permitted through a Level II request in the T District. Density, as discussed previously in this document, has been augmented through the units allocated from the Reserve. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this provision. Section B.2 requires that portions of any structures which exceed 100 feet are spaced at least 100 feet apart. This section also includes overall separation requirements for structures over 100 feet in height as two options: (1) no more than two structures which exceed 100 feet within 500 feet; or (2) no more than four structures which exceed 100 feet within 800 feet. The proposal provides for a building which is 100 feet in height. Therefore, this Guideline is not applicable to the proposal. Section B.3 provides that the floorplate of any portion of a building that exceeds 45 feet in height is limited as follows: a) Between 45 feet and 100 feet the floorplate will be no greater than 25,000 square feet except for parking structures open to the public; and b) Between 100 feet and 150 feet, the floorplate will be no greater than 10,000 square feet; and c) Deviations to the above floorplate requirements may be approved provided the mass and scale of the design creates a tiered effect and complies with the maximum building envelop allowance above 45 feet as described in Section C. 1.4 of the Design Guidelines. The floorplate between 45 feet and 100 feet is 24,417 square. Therefore, this section is supported by the proposal. Section C addresses issues relating to design, scale and building mass. These topics are quantified in six parts as follows: Community Development Board — April 21, 2015 FLD2014-12034 — Page 4 � C1Q�1 1'1'�tl.l Level II Flexible DevelopmentApplication Review PLA�vn��rrG�°EV�LOPMErrr DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION . '�e,�r'x"�F .�.._ +5 : �. Section C.1 requires buildings with a footprint of greater than 5,000 square feet or a single dimension greater than 100 feet to be constructed so that no more than two of the three building dimensions in the vertical or horizontal planes are equal in length. The proposed building footprint is 15,764 square feet. The applicant has provided (Sheet AS_5) that no two building dimensions are equal in length. Therefore, this provision is supported by the proposal. Section C.2 requires no plane or elevation to continue uninterrupted for greater than 100 feet without an offset of more than five feet. No portion of any building fa�ade continues for more than 100 feet in length without the required offset as seen on Sheet AS_5. Therefore, this provision is supported by the proposal. Section C.3 requires at least 60 percent of any elevation (with elevation being defined as that portion of a building that is visible from a particular point outside the parcel proposed for development) to be covered with windows or architectural decoration. The application indicates compliance with this requirement using windows, balconies and architectural details including decorative grilles and panels, parapet caps and similar detailing on all facades. Coverage ranges between 61 and 69 percent of any given fa�ade (Sheets AS_6 and AS_7). Therefore, this provision is supported by the proposal. Section C.4 provides that no more than 60 percent of the theoretical maximum building envelope located above 45 feet will be occupied by a building. The applicant has demonstrated (Sheet AS_8) that the overall building mass between 45 and 100 feet constitutes approximately 34 percent of the theoretical maximum building envelope. Therefore, this provision is supported by the proposal. Section C. S requires that the height and mass of buildings will be correlated to: (1) the dimensional aspects of the parcel proposed for development and (2) adjacent public spaces such as streets and parks. The adjacent Devon Drive right-of-way is 60 feet in width. The four-story base of the building, consistent in height with the building directly west, is 15 feet from the street right-of-way while the hotel directly west is setback only five feet from the Devon Drive right-of-way. Above the first four floors, the building steps back on the east and west sides providing an increased setback from the hotel to the west and detached dwelling to the east. Therefore, this provision is supported by the proposal. Section C.6 permits buildings to be designed for a vertical or horizontal mix of permitted uses. The proposal includes overnight accommodations (with accessory uses for hotel guests only). Therefore, this provision is supported by the proposal. Section D addresses the issues of sidewalk widths, setbacks and stepbacks. These topics are quantified in three parts as follows: Section D.1 provides that the distances from structures to the edge of the right-of-way should be 15 feet along arterials, and 12 feet along local streets. The proposal provides a building setback of 15 feet along Devon Drive which is a local street. The proposal includes a sidewalk along Devon Drive five feet in width which matches the existing sidewalk for the property directly west. Therefore, this Guideline is met by this proposal. Community Development Board — April 2l , 2015 FLD2014-12034 — Page 5 ? C�L�i ►taLel Level II Flexible Develo mentA lication Review PL^rrxmrG�DEV�LOrMExr P pp DEVELOPMENT REV�W DIVISION � �.�. ��:w� r � _ Section D.2 provides that except for the side and rear setbacks set forth elsewhere in Beach by Design, no side or rear setback lines are recommended, except as may be required to comply with the City's Fire Code. The Small Motel District requires 10 foot side setbacks. The proposal includes a side (east) setback of 10 feet (to building) and side (west) setback of 41.2 feet (to building). Therefore, this Guideline is met by this proposal. Section D.3 addresses setbacks and stepbacks along Coronado and Hamden Drives. Buildings constructed with a front setback of 15 feet or more sha11 stepback with a minimum depth of 15 feet from the setback line at a height not more than 25 feet. The proposal is located along Devon Drive and thus the setbacks and stepbacks along Coronado and Hamden Drives is not applicable. Section E addresses issues of street-level facades and the incorporation of human-scale features into the facades of buildings in three parts. Section E.1 requires that at least 60 percent of the street level facades (the portion of the building within 12 feet of grade) of buildings used for nonresidential purposes which abut a public street or pedestrian access way, will include windows or doors that allow pedestrians to see into the building, or landscaped or hardscaped courtyard or plazas, where street level facades are set back at least 15 feet from the edge of the sidewalk and the area between the sidewalk and the facade is a landscaped or hardscaped courtyard or plaza. In addition parking structures should utilize axchitectural details and design elements such as false recessed windows, arches, planter boxes, metal grillwork, etc. instead of transparent alternatives. When a parking garage abuts a public road or other public place, it will be designed such that the function of the building is not readily apparent except at points of ingress and egress. The proposed building provide for a modern, streamlined building design with an extensive use of glass and balconies which mitigates the bulk of the structure in addition to overall stepbacks of approximately 56 feet along the west side of the building and 40 feet along the east side of the building. In addition, the site plan includes an extensive use of landscaping along the south of the site fronting Devon Drive. The parking structure component of the hotel building will include the use of the same materials as the hotel building and will echo the pattern of openings of the hotel. Therefore, this Guideline is met by this proposal. Section E.2 provides that window coverings, and other opaque materials may cover no more than 10 percent of the area of any street-level window in a nonresidential building that fronts on a public right-of-way. While this is more of an operationally-related requirement, the applicant has committed to meet this provision. Therefore, this Guideline is met by this proposal. Section E.3 requires that building entrances should be aesthetically inviting and easily identified. The entrances to the buildings are within the ground level area of the building. Decorative lighting and other design features will be employed to demarcate the area creating, essentially, a porte cochere. Therefore, this Guideline is met by this proposal. Community Development Board — April 21, 2015 FLD2014-12034 — Page 6 '- C11.tF1 vt(#�l�l Level II Flexible DevelopmentApplication Review PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT — DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION .�. ��: .at ....-�. . Section E.4 recommends the use of awnings and other structures that offer pedestrians cover from the elements especially at entryways. The proposal does not lend itself to over-street awnings and the entrance to the hotel is located within the ground level area. Therefore, this Guideline is not applicable to the proposal. Section F addresses issues related to parking areas. Parking is addressed via structured parking located on the first four floors of the proposed building and the entrances will be well-delineated. The hotel parking garage structure is integrated into the design of the building via the use of openings which mimic the pattern of windows and balconies of the hotel component. Therefore, this Guideline is met by this proposal. Section G addresses issues related to signage. A sign package has not been included with the submittal. Any proposed signage will be required to meet the requirements of this section of Beach by Design and any applicable portions of the Community Development Code. Section H addresses issues related to sidewalks (also addressed in part by Section D, above) and provides that all sidewalks along arterials and retail streets should be at least 10 feet in width. The proposal includes sidewalk five feet in width along Devon Drive which will match the existing sidewalk. Devon Drive is neither an arterial or retail street and previous approvals have provided a five foot sidewalk. Therefore, this Guideline is not applicable to the proposal. Section I addresses issues related to street furniture and bicycle racks. Street benches and trash receptacles are proposed along Devon Drive and shall be designed per Code and submitted for approval at building permit. Bicycle racks will be provided within the ground floor garage area. Therefore, this Guideline is met by this proposal. Section J addresses issues related to street lighting. Street lighting is not proposed with this development. Therefore, this section is not applicable to the proposal. Section K addresses issues related to fountains. Fountains and/or other water features are not proposed. Therefore this Guideline is not applicable to the proposal. Section L addresses issues related to materials and colors. Finish materials and building colors are required to reflect Florida or coastal vernacular themes. The proposed hotel building has a distinctive contemporary design that will make it an attractive landmark at this location. The primary color of the building will be white and sand colored stucco to compliment its sister building, Pier House 60, immediately to the west. While the applicant may adjust the color scheme any such adjustment would require Staff review and approval and must meet the requirements of this portion of the Design Guidelines. The proposed color scheme and material schedule as submitted meets the requirements of this section. Comprehensive Plan: The proposal is supported by applicable various Goals, Objectives and/or Policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan as follows: Community Development Board — April 21, 2015 FLD2014-12034 — Page 7 � C1L�1 1'1'lil�l Level II Flexible Develo mentA lication Review PLn�r�rrG�nsvELOrMErrr p pp DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DNISION _ x�4���. _ Future Land Use Plan Element: Policy A.1.2.1 - The City shall require new or redeveloped overnight accommodations uses located within the City's coastal storm area to have a hurricane evacuation plan, approved by the City, for all guests. This plan shall require the commencement of evacuation of hotel guests as soon as a hurricane watch is posted for the City. A Hurricane Evacuation Plan will be submitted to and approved by the City prior to the issuance of any permits. Therefore, the proposal will support this Policy Policy A.3.2.1 - All new development or redevelopment ofproperty within the City of Clearwater shall meet all landscape requirements of the Community Development Code. The proposal meets the requirements of the CDC by providing landscaping along all sides of the site in excess of CDC requirements and supports this Policy. Goal A. S- The ciry of Clearwater shall ident� and utilize a citywide Design structure comprised of a hierarchy of places and linkages. The citywide design structure will serve as a guide to development and land use decisions while protecting those elements that make the city uniquely Cleanvater. Objective A. S.1— Establish the Hierarchy of Places as shown on Map A-14. Policy A. 5.1.1 - Identify Activity Centers: high intensity, high-density multi-use areas designated as appropriate for intensive growth and routinely provide service to a significant number of citizens of more than one county. Activity centers are proximate and accessible to interstate or major arterial roadways, and are composed of multiple destination points, landmarks and neighborhood centers and character features. The subject site is located within an Activity Center identified on Map A-14 in the FLUE of the City's Comprehensive Plan where the proposal includes a high-intensity, high density development. Therefore, the proposal will support this Goal, Objective and Policy. Objective A. S. S- Promote high quality design standards that support Clearwater's image and contribute to its identity. The proposal includes the redevelopment of a lot currently used as overnight accommodations with 98 new hotel units. The proposal includes a new attractive building which meets the requirements of the Design Guidelines of Beach by Design and supports this Objective. Policy A. S. S.1 Development should be designed to maintain and support the existing or envisioned character of the neighborhood. The proposal is consistent with the vision of Beach by Design, the Small Motel District and the Design Guidelines and supports this Policy. Objective A.6.1 - The redevelopment of blighted, substandard, inefficient and/or obsolete areas shall be a high priority and promoted through the implementation of redevelopment and special area plans, the construction of catalytic private projects, city investment, and continued emphasis on property maintenance standards. In adopting Beach by Design the City recognized that large portions of the Beach could be classified as blighted, substandard and suffered from "obsolescence and age". One of the goals of Beach by Design is to reverse this trend of disinvestment. This goal is well on the way to Community Development Board — April 21, 2015 FLD2014-12034 — Page 8 } C�����lt.l Level II Flexible Development Application Review PLANNING � naveLOrMErrr . �§�"�t�; _ ;. .;� . DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION being met (perhaps even exceeded) in many areas of the Beach. The proposed hotel should be seen as an important component in fulfilling the vision of the Beach Walk District and one more step in the revitalization of the Beach and supports this Objective. Policy A.6.1.2 - Renewal of the beach tourist district shall be encouraged through the establishment of distinct districts within Clearwater Beach, the establishment of a limited density pool of additional hotel rooms to be used in specified geographic areas of Clearwater Beach, enhancement of public rights-of-way, the vacation of public rights-of-way when appropriate, transportation improvements, inter-beach and intra-beach transit, transfer of development rights and the use of design guidelines, pursuant to Beach by Design: A Preliminary Design for Clearwater Beach and Design Guidelines. As explored previously in this document, the site was the subject of an allocation of 66 hotel units from the Reserve which allows for a total of 98 hotel units. The redevelopment of this parcel with a hotel will play an important role in the continuing renewal and revitalization of the Beach. Therefore, the proposal supports this Policy. Objective A.6.6 - Tourism is a substantial element of the Ciry's economic base and as such the City shall continue to support the maintenance and enhancement of this important economic sector. Policy A.6.6.1 - The City supports and encourages the continued development and redevelopment of overnight accommodation uses. The proposed redevelopment includes an overnight accommodation use which will serve tourists and locals alike contributing to a vibrant successful resort destination and supports this Objective and Policy. Policy A.6.8.3 - Where appropriate, development shall provide a sense of pedestrian scale on streets through minimal front setbacks, similar building heights, street trees and proportionality of building heights to street widths. The proposal includes a significant overnight accommodation use with an overall height of 100 feet. However, this height is mitigated in several ways: l. The bulk of the building is setback a minimum of approximately 15 feet from the front property line; 2. Lush landscaping will be provided along the south side of the building with additional landscaping along the other three sides of the building; 3. The provision of a seamless connection between the site and Beach Walk through the use of a large plaza; 4. The build-to line along Devon Drive is setback 10 feet greater than the hotel immediately to the west; and 5. A sidewalk five feet in width will be located along Devon Drive. The overall effect of the proposal will pedestrian-scale consistent with the goals and vision of Beach by Design and the Beach Walk District and supports this Policy. Community Development Code: The proposal is supported by the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code as follows: Community Development Board — Apri121, 2015 FLD2014-12034 — Page 9 � C�L�1 �a141 Level II Flexible Develo ment A lication Review FLANNING & DEVELOPMENT P PP DEVELOPMENTREVIEWDIVISION � � .... Section 1-103.B.1. Allowing property owners to enhance the value of their property through innovative and creative redevelopment. The property owner will redevelop the property with a new attractive building, a vibrant use (overnight accommodations with accessory amenities including a restaurant for hotel guests only) and will contribute to the public space with lush landscaping and sidewalk five feet in width along Devon Drive. The sidewalk along Devon Drive will match the existing sidewalk to the west of the site. The development is considered innovative by the incorporation of units allocated from the Reserve. Therefore, the proposal supports this CDC Section. Section 1-103.B.2. Ensuring that development and redevelopment will not have a negative impact on the value of surrounding prope�ties and wherever practicable promoting development and redevelopment which will enhance the value of surrounding properties. Surrounding properties are generally developed with a myriad of uses indicative of a tourist destination including overnight accommodations, retail sales and services, bars, restaurants and detached dwellings. The proposed hotel will constitute an appropriate use for the neighborhood and is a use within the Small Motel District of Beach by Design. Surrounding properties will be enhanced through the addition of uses which will contribute to an active and vibrant street life. Therefore, the proposal supports this CDC Section. Section 1-103. B. 3. Strengthening the city's economy and increasing its tax base as a whole. The proposal includes the redevelopment of what could be considered an outdated 27-unit hotel in one of the more valuable areas of the City vis-a-vis tourism with a new 98-unit hotel. In addition, the new hotel will create new jobs and will positively contributing to the City's economy and its tax base. Therefore, the proposal supports this CDC Section. Section 1-103. D. It is the further purpose of this Development Code to make the beautification of the city a matter of the highest priority and to require that existing and future uses and structures in the city are attractive and well-maintained to the maximum extent permitted by law. The proposal includes a new attractive building characterized by a modern style and crisp, clean lines. In addition, this proposal provides landscaping along all sides of the building. The landscape design incorporates plant material that is native and/or naturalized and salt tolerant, while providing visual interest. Therefore, the proposal supports this CDC Section. Section 1-103. E. S. Preserve the natural resources and aesthetic character of the community for both the resident and tourist population consistent with the city's economic underpinnings. The proposal will support both the resident and tourist populations with an attractive new hotel. The proposal will be consistent with the desired form and function of the design guidelines of Beach by Design. Therefore, the proposal supports this CDC Section. Section 2-401.1 Intent of the T District and RFH FL UP classification. The CDC provides that it is the intent of the T District that development be consistent with the Countywide Future Land Use Plan as required by state law. The uses and development potential of a parcel of land within the T District shall be determined by the standards found in this Development Code as well as the Countywide Future Land Use Designation of the property, including any acreage or floor area restrictions set forth in the Rules Concerning the Administration of the Countywide Future Land Use Plan, as amended from time to time. For those parcels within the T District that have an area within the boundaries of and governed by a special area plan approved by the city council and the countywide planning authority, maximum Community Development Board — April 21, 2015 FLD2014-12034 — Page l 0 t C�eal�til�l Level II Flexible Develo mentA lication Review PL`�rrING&DEV�LOPMENT P PP DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION ��.���r , � F. . development potential shall be as set forth for each classification of use and location in the approved plan. Section 2.3.3.4.6 of the Countywide Land Use Rules provides that the purpose of the RFH FLUP classification is to depict those areas of the County that are now developed, or appropriate to be developed, with high density residential and resort, tourist facility uses, and to recognize such areas as well-suited for the combination of residential and temporary lodging use consistent with their location, surrounding uses, transportation facilities and natural resource characteristics of such areas. The site is proposed to be developed with a hotel which is a use permitted by the RFH FLUP classification. Development Parameters: Densitv: Pursuant to the Countywide Future Land Use Plan and CDC Section 2-801.1, the maximum density for properties with a designation of Resort Facilities High is 50 overnight accommodation units per acre. On October 15, 2014, the City Council approved the allocation of up to 66 units from the Hotel Density Reserve under Beach by Design (Case No. HDA2014-07004) and adopted a resolution to the same effect (Res. No. 14-32). The proposal includes 98 hotel rooms as consistent with HDA2014-07004. Impervious Surface Ratio (ISR): Pursuant to the Countywide Future Land Use Plan and CDC Section 2-801.1, the maximum allowable ISR for properties with a designation of Resort Facilities High is 0.95. The overall proposed ISR is 0.80, based on only that area zoned T District, which is consistent with the Code provisions. It is noted that the 0.17 acre zoned LMDR District is proposed as a retention pond and open space, with no impervious surfaces. Minimum Lot Area and Width: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-803, there is no minimum required lot area and width for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. However, for a point of comparison, pursuant to CDC Table 2-803, the minimum lot area for overnight accommodations can range between 10,000 — 20,000 square feet. The lot area for that portion of the subject property zoned T District is 28,688 square feet. The eastern 7,473 square feet of the subject property is zoned LMDR District. Pursuant to the same Table, the minimum lot width for overnight accommodations can range between 100 — 150 feet. The lot width along Devon Drive is approximately 175 feet. The site is consistent with these Code provisions. Minimum Setbacks: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-803, there are no minimum required setbacks for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. However, for a point of comparison, pursuant to CDC Table 2- 802, the minimum front setback for Overnight Accommodations can range between 10 and 15 feet and minimum side setbacks between zero and 10 feet. Community Development Board — April 21, 2015 FLD2014-12034 — Page 11 � Cl�.ul 1'1'�Ll.l Level II Flexible Develo mentA lication Review PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT p pp DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION " �.���������:_ , . The proposal includes a front (south) setback of 15.08 feet (to building) and zero feet (to pavement), a side (west) setback of 10 feet (to building) and five feet (to sidewalk), a rear (north) setback of 40.12 feet (to building) and 4.16 feet (to patio decking). The proposal is consistent with the setback requirements of CDC Table 2-803 for Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Proj ects. Maximum Buildin�Hei� Pursuant to CDC Table 2-803, there is no maximum height for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. However, for a point of comparison, pursuant to CDC Table 2-802, the maximum allowable height for Overnight Accommodations can range between 35 and 50 feet. CDC Table 2-803 permits Overnight Accommodations at a height of up to 100 feet. Please note that height is measured from the point from which minimum floor elevations in flood prone areas have been established by law to the highest finished roof surface in the case of a building with a flat roof. The proposed building height of 100 feet is generally permitted as the site received density via the Reserve and the building meets all applicable portions of the Design Guidelines. The proposal also complies with the Code requirements under the definition of "Height, Building or Structure" for elevator and stair overruns and mechanical rooms, which are permitted to extend a maximum of 16 feet above the otherwise permitted height. It should be noted that this CDC section further provides that structures permanently affixed to the roof that accommodate rooftop occupancy shall only be permitted if within the maximum allowable height. This will limit the potential for rooftop activities and occupancy by guests of the hotel. Minimum Off-street Parkin�: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-803, there is no minimum off-street parking requirement for Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Projects. However, as a point of reference, pursuant to Tables 2-802 parking for Overnight Accommodations is 1.2 spaces per unit which requires a minimum of 118 spaces for 98 hotel rooms where a minimum of 118 spaces are provided. The parking garage must comply with the Building Code and have a vertical clear height for a11 parking garage levels of not less than seven feet including the entrance and exit. This clear height includes any structural beams, fire sprinkler pipes and heads, electrical conduits and lighting, drainage pipes and any other building elements. The proposal is therefore consistent with the Code provisions of Article 2 Division 8 and Beach by Design. Mechanical Equipment; Pursuant to CDC Sections 3-201.D.1 and 3-903.I, all outside mechanical equipment must be screened so as not to be visible from public streets and/or abutting properties. There will be mechanical equipment located within the building and on the roof of the building. The equipment on the roof area will be adequately screened from view from adjacent properties and rights-of-way by solid screening. This screening of inechanical equipment will also be reviewed at time of the building permit submission. Sight Visibility Triangles: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-904.A, to minimize hazards at the intersection of streets and/or driveways, no structures or landscaping may be installed which will obstruct views at a level between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade within 20-foot sight visibility triangles. This proposal does not propose any structures within the required sight visibility triangles and landscaping within them will be limited to groundcovers and low shrubs, Community Development Board — Apri121, 2015 FLD2014-12034 — Page 12 � C�L�1 1'1RLt.1 Level II Flexible Develo mentA lication Review FLANNING&DEVELOPMENT P PP DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION . . . �� �». �, , complying with this provision. This proposal has been reviewed by the City's Traffic Engineering Department and been found to be acceptable. Landscaping located within the sight visibility triangles will need to be maintained to meet the Code requirements. Utilities: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-912, for development that does not involve a subdivision, all utilities including individual distribution lines must be installed underground unless such undergrounding is not practicable. There are no existing overhead utility lines, serving this development, within the rights-of-way adjacent to the site. All utilities that will serve the site will be placed underground. It is unknown of the location of proposed electric panels, boxes and meters for this hotel. If located exterior to the building, this electrical equipment should be painted the same color as the building to ensure views are minimized. The location and potential views of such electrical equipment will be addressed at the building permit stage. Landscaping: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.D, there are no perimeter buffers required in the Tourist District for this site. This proposal meets or exceeds the required minimum five foot wide building foundation landscape area along Devon Drive. There will also be foundation or perimeter plantings along the other three sides of the building. The landscape design incorporates plant material that is native and/or naturalized and salt tolerant, while providing visual interest. The pedestrian scale along Devon Drive will be enhanced with accent and palm trees, shrubs and groundcover beds. Solid Waste: A solid waste component will be located within the loading area within the southwest corner of the building. The dumpster will be rolled out to a staging area along Devon Drive for servicing. The proposal has been found to be acceptable by the City's Solid Waste Department. Si n�a� The proposal does not include a signage package at this time. All signage will be required to meet the applicable portions of the Community Development Code and the Design Guidelines of Beach by Design. Compliance with General Applicability Standards: The proposal supports the General Applicability requirements of this Code as follows: Section 3-914.A.1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The proposal includes a 98-unit hotel within a 9-story building. The proposed building includes a contemporary design that will make it an attractive landmark at this location. The subject site is surrounded by a myriad of uses indicative of a tourist destination including overnight accommodations, retail sales and services, bars, resta.urants and detached dwellings. The proposed hotel development will constitute an appropriate use for the neighborhood and is a desired use within the Small Motel District of Beach by Design. The proposal includes lush landscaping which exceeds the intent of the CDC and will complement and enhance surrounding properties. The immediate vicinity is typified by buildings between one and 10 floors. Therefore, the proposal supports this Code section. Community Development Board — April2l , 2015 FLD2014-12034 — Page 13 � vi��i rit41�1 Level II Flexible Develo mentA lication Review PL��G�nEVELOrMErrr P PP DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION - � :�;;�� . . t Section 3-914.A.2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The proposal is, as discussed in relation to CDC Section 3-914.A.1, above, consistent with the character of adjacent properties and with the intent and vision of Beach by Design, the Small Motel District and the Design Guidelines. The applicant has shown through substantial competent evidence that the proposal is similar in nature vis-a-vis form and function to adjacent and nearby properties. The proposal will not impair the value of adjacent properties nor prevent or discourage their redevelopment. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section. Section 3-914.A.3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood. The proposal will likely have no effect, negative or otherwise, on the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section. Section 3-914.A.4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. The proposal has been designed to have a minimal effect on traffic congestion. Naturally, the development of a 98-unit hotel will increase the amount of traffic in the area. However, this expected increase in traffic has been mitigated with ample space for vehicle stacking on site. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section. Section 3-914.A. S. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity. As previously discussed, the community character consists primarily of a variety of uses including overnight accommodations, retail sales and services, bars, restaurants and detached dwellings between one and 10 stories. The modern architectural style of the building combined with lush landscaping will complement and enhance adjacent properties. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section. Section 3-914.A. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse visual and acoustic impacts on adjacent properties. This is accomplished by locating solid waste facilities within the building and by locating the outdoor pool and patio on the fifth floor on the east side of the building away from nearby residential uses to the east. There should be no olfactory impacts of any kind. The bulk of the building (the tower component) has significant stepbacks from the east and west sides of the building and adjacent properties. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section. Compliance with Flexibility Criteria: The proposal supports the specific Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria pursuant to CDC Section 2-803.D as follows: 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. Community Development Board — Apri121, 2015 FLD2014-12034 — Page 14 � Cleal 1'1'aLel Level II Flexible Develo mentA lication Review PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT p pp DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION �� , The site is the recipient of 66 units from the Reserve. It is generally understood that a viable overnight accommodation project on the Beach requires additional density and, in turn certain amounts of flexibility with regard to setbacks and height. The requested decrease in the front (south) setback to zero feet and side (west) setback to five feet is only for an at- grade sidewalk. The requested decrease in rear (north) setback to 4.16 feet is for an at-grade patio. No decreases in setbacks to building are requested and setbacks consistent with the CDC are otherwise provided. The proposed height of 100 feet is mitigated by overall building stepbacks and is, in fact, encouraged in this area of Beach by Design for buildings which meet the requirements of the Design Guidelines (which this project has been adjudged to have met as explored in detail elsewhere in this report) and which have acquired additional density through mechanisms such as the Reserve. In fact, one of the strategies of Beach by Design is to "optimize project densities" on the Beach. In short, the number of units directly affects the form of the building vis-a-vis height, setbacks and area of floorplate. In order to create a viable hotel with the number of proposed units the requested level of flexibility is needed. As such, the proposal is a reasonably expected design solution consistent with established and approved uses on adjacent properties. It follows that a reasonable conclusion is that the redevelopment of the site is otherwise impractical without deviations from the development standards as otherwise provided in the T District. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. The redevelopment of the site will be consistent with a variety of Goals, Objectives and Policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of the CDC as examined in detail previously in this document. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. As mentioned, all surrounding properties are developed with a variety of destination resort uses including overnight accommodations, retail sales and services, bars, restaurants and detached dwellings between one and 10 stories. The proposal should have no impact on the ability of adjacent properties to redevelop or otherwise be improved in accordance with the requirements and limitations of Beach by Design. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development. As discussed in detail, the proposal is similar to and will support adjacent uses. The proposed height is similar to other buildings in the area. In addition, the placement of the building, accessory uses and parking is similar to adjacent properties. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section. S. The proposed use shall othenvise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use Community Development Board — Apri121, 2015 FLD2014-12034 — Page I S '�iL��aL�� Level II Flexible Develo ment A plication Review PLAMIING & DEVELOPMENT p p DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION - ��~��; � characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of six objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the city's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; As mentioned previously, the T District permits overnight accommodations as a flexible standard development use. The proposal will increase the density of the site over what is there now and otherwise permitted by the CDC given the allocation of hotel units from the Reserve. The proposal, in addition to providing a total of 98 hotel rooms, is expected to create additional jobs. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district. As mentioned, surrounding properties are developed with a variety of uses typical of a tourist destination including overnight accommodations, retail sales and services, bars, restaurants and detached dwellings. The proposed hotel will support and complement surrounding uses with regard to form and function. The proposal will have no effect on the ability of surrounding properties to be redeveloped or otherwise improved in a manner consistent with and limited by Beach by Design. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section. b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the city. As discussed in detail in this document, the proposal is fully compliant with all applicable portions of the Design Guidelines of Beach by Design. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section. c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area. The proposal provides for a use similar in scale and scope as other developments both built and approved in the area and, as discussed in detail, is supported by the vision of the Small Motel District of Beach by Design. The proposed hotel is desired on the Beach and will support surrounding uses such as retail, restaurants and outdoor recreation and entertainment. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section. d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: ■ Changes in horizontal building planes; ■ Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; ■ Variety in materials, colors and textures; ■ Distinctive fenestration patterns; ■ Building stepbacks; and Community Development Board — April 21, 2415 FLD2014-12034 — Page 16 '�1l.Ai ►±(l�6�1 Level II Flexible Development Application Review . �^xY'� . .. PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION ■ Distinctive roofs forms. The architecture of the buildings provides for substantial articulation of the fenestration through the use balconies, railings, windows and building offset. The buildings and site design have been explored in detail as part of the discussion addressed compliance with the Design Guidelines of Beach by Design. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. The proposal provides a minimum of 15.08: from the property line along Devon Drive and a minimum distance of 31 feet from the adjacent street as measured from the edge of roadway to the base of the building. The building also includes stepbacks of between approximately 40 and 56 feet. Lush landscaping that exceeds the intent of the CDC is provided along all sides of the site. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section. Section 4-206.D.4: Burden of proof. The burden of proof is upon the applicant substantial competent evidence that he is entitled to the approval requested. The applicant has adequately demonstrated through the submittal of substantial evidence that the request is entitled to the approval requested as required by CDC 206.D.4. Community Development Board — Apri121, 2015 FLD20 ] 4-12034 — Page 17 to show by competent Section 4- 9�lea.rwater Level II Flexible Development Application Review . ..�k�e:�.$ . tN.�..;:: : . PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION Compliance with Standards and Criteria: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the standards as per CDC Tables 2-801.1 and 2-803: Standard Proposed Consistentl Inconsistent Density 50 overnight 98 overnight accommodation units. X accommodation units per acre (32 units) plus 66 units from the Reserve (98 units total) Impervious Surface Ratio 0.95 0.80 X Minimum Lot Area N/A 36,161 sf total (28,688 sf zoned T X District & 7,473 sf zoned LMDR District) Minimum Lot Width N/A 175 feet X Minimum Setbacks Front: N/A South: 15 feet (to building) X 5 feet (to paving) Side: N/A West: 10 feet (to building) X 5 feet (to paving) X Rear: N/A North: 40.12 feet (to building) 4.16 feet (to patio decking) Maximum Height N/A 100 feet (from BFE to top of flat roofl X Minimum Determined by the 118 spaces (1.2 spaces per unit) X Off-Street Parking community development coordinator for all other uses based on the specific use and/or ITE Manual standards � See analysis in Staff Report Compliance with General Applicability Standards: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards for Level One and Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3-914.A: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development wili not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation imnacts on adiacent nronerties. 1 See analysis in staff report. Community Development Board — Apri121, 2015 FLD2014-12034 — Page 18 Consistent� I Inconsistent X X X X X X ' vlbt�l 1'F'ii6�l Level II Flexible Develo ment Application Review PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT P DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION „ � e�,.. ... .. Compliance with Flexibility Criteria: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per CDC Section 2-803.D (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project): Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from X� the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of X the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly X development and improvement of surrounding properties. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed X development. 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use X' category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or a. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street X� parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: ❑ Changes in horizontal building planes; ❑ Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; ❑ Variety in materials, colors and textures; ❑ Distinctive fenestration patterns; ❑ Building stepbacks; and ❑ Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. I See analysis in Staff Report. Community Development Board — April 21, 2015 FLD2014-12034 — Page 19 � viL�l 1't�641 Level II Flexible Development Application Review ...�.�'^�`s .a ... . .. Compliance with Beach by Design Design Guidelines: 1. Section A: Density. 2. Section B: Height. 3. Section C: Design, Scale and Mass of Buildings. 4. Section D: Setbacks. 5. Section: Street-Level Fa�ades. 6. Section F: Parking Areas. 7. Section G: Signage. 8. Section H: Sidewalks. 9. Section I: Street Furniture and Bicycle Racks. 10. Section J: Street Lighting. 11. Section K: Fountains. 12. Section L: Materials and Colors. 1 See analysis in Staff Report. PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION Consistent� � Inconsistent X X X X X X N/A X X N/A N/A X SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meeting of March 5, 2015, and deemed the development proposal to be legally sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: Findings of Fact: The Planning and Development Department, having reviewed all evidence submitted by the applicant and requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact: 1. The total 0.831 acre paxcel is located on the north side of Devon Drive, approximately 150 feet east of Coronado Drive; 2. The majority of the subject property (0.659 acre) is zoned T District, but the eastern portion (0.172 acre) of the subject property north of the adjacent detached dwelling at 94 Devon Drive is zoned LMDR District and is not part of Beach by Design; 3. That the portion of property located within the T District has a corresponding Resort Facilities High (RFH) Future Land Use Plan category designation; 4. The property is currently occupied by the Sea Captain Motel, a 27-unit overnight accommodation use; 5. That the subject property is located in the Small Motel District of Beach by Design; 6. The proposal is to construct an 98-unit overnight accommodation use at a density of 128.98 rooms/acre, which includes the allocation of 66 units from the Hotel Density Reserve under Beach by Design, totally within the area zoned T District (only a retention pond and open space is proposed within the area zoned LMDR District); 7. That on December 21, 2010, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved Case No. FLD2010-02007; 8. That on May 21, 2013, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved Case No. FLD2013-02007; Community Development Board — Apri121, 2015 FLD2014-12034 — Page 20 � C1L4t�1'1'�l���Level II Flexible Develo mentA lication Review PLn�x�NG�DEV�.LOPMENT P PP DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION ' v � � ;.. 9. That on October 15, 2014, the City Council approved the allocation of up to 66 units from the Hotel Density Reserve under Beach by Design (Case No. HDA2014-07004) and adopted a resolution to the same effect (Res. No. 14-132); 10. That the site plans associated with Case Nos. FLD2010-08004 and FLD2013-02007 have expired; 11. That the proposal is to construct an 98-unit overnight accommodation use at a density of 128.98 rooms/acre, which includes the allocation of 66 units from the Hotel Density Reserve under Beach by Design, totally within the area zoned T District (only a retention pond and open space is proposed within the area zoned LMDR District); 12. That the proposal includes amenities such as dining area and exercise room for guest use only; 13. That the proposal includes a minimum of 118 parking spaces where 118 spaces are required; 14. That the proposed hotel height is 100 feet from Base Flood Elevation to top of flat roof deck; 15. That the proposal includes a front (south) setback of 15 feet (to building) and zero feet (to pavement, a side (west) setback of 10 feet (to building) and five feet (to pavement) and a rear (west) setback of 40.12 feet (to building) and 4.16 feet (to pavement); 16. That the proposal is otherwise fully in compliance with all applicable portions of the design guidelines of Beach by Design; and 17. There are no active Code Compliance cases for the subject property. Conclusions of Law: The Planning and Development Department, having made the above findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards pursuant to CDC Tables 2- 801.1 and 2-803; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria pursuant to CDC Section 2-803.D; 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals pursuant to CDC Section 3-914.A; 4. That the development is consistent with the General Purposes of the CDC pursuant to CDC Section 1-103; 5. That the development is consistent with applicable components of the City's Comprehensive Plan; 6. That the application is consistent with the requirement for the submittal of substantial competent evidence pursuant to CDC Section 4-206.D.4; 7. That the development is consistent with the Small Motel District of Beach by Design; and 8. That the development proposal is consistent with the Design Guidelines of Beach by Design. Based upon the above, the Planning and Development Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development approval to permit a 98-room overnight accommodation use in the Tourist (T) District with a total lot area of 36,161 square feet (0.831 acre) (28,688 square feet [0.659 acre] zoned Tourist District and 7,473 square feet [0.172 acre] zoned Low Medium Density Residential District), a lot width of 174.05 feet, a front (south) setback of 15.08 feet (to building) and zero feet (to pavement), a side (west) setback of 10 feet (to building) and five feet (to sidewalk), a rear (north) setback of 40.12 feet (to building) and 4.16 feet (to patio decking), a building height of 100 feet (to top of flat roof deck) and 118 parking spaces at 1.2 spaces per room, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project pursuant to CDC Section 2-803.D; and Community Development Board — April 21, 2015 FLD2014-12034 — Page 21 � C��.(ll /I�L�� Level II Flexible Develo ment A lication Review PL^r��rrG& nsvELOrMErrr P Pp DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION " � �.����br: _ a two-year Development Order pursuant to CDC Section 4-407. subject to the following conditions: Conditions of Approval: l. That any future freestanding sign(s) be a monument-style sign and that all signs be designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building; 2. That all irrigation systems be connected to the City reclaimed water system where available per Clearwater Code of Ordinances, Article IX., Reclaimed Water System, Section 32.376. Reclaimed water lines are available in the South Gulfview Boulevard right-of-way; 3. That application for a building permit be submitted no later than Apri121, 2017, unless time extensions are granted pursuant to CDC Section 4-407; 4. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the elevations approved by the CDB; 5. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, an easement be obtained to retain the existing four- foot high wall along the west property line that extends onto the adjoining parcel; 6. That, prior to the issuance of the building permit, the location and visibility of electric equipment (electric panels, boxes and meters) be reviewed and, if located exterior to the building where visible from Devon Drive, be painted the same color as the building; 7. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, except for clearing and grubbing or the provision of fill, all Engineering, Environmental, Land Resource, Solid Waste, Parks and Recreation, Stormwater and Traffic Department conditions be met; 8. That, prior to the issuance of any building permits, except for clearing and grubbing or the provision of fill, the Fire Department may require the provision of a Water Study performed by a Fire Protection Engineer in order to ensure that an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of the project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required iire sprinkler, standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required, then the water supply must be able to supply 150 percent of its rated capacity; 9. That, prior to the issuance of any building permits, except for clearing and grubbing or the provision of fill, all sub-standard sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adj acent to or a part of the project shall be shown on plans to be improved to meet the requirement of Local, State andlor Federal standards including A.D.A. requirements (truncated domes per FDOT Index #304); 10. That the fit, finish, materials, installation methodology of the sidewalk and any associated sidewalk amenities (such as benches, trash receptacles, trees, lighting), as the case may be, be coordinated with and approved by City Staff prior to the issuance of any permits; 11. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, except for clearing and grubbing or the provision of fill, a Hurricane Evacuation Plan be submitted to and approved by the City; 12. That, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the current stormwater easement shall be vacated and the new stormwater easement shall be recorded; and 13. That, prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, all service lines onto the property shall be installed underground. Prepared by Planning and Development Department Staff: � Matt Jackson, Planner III ATTACHMENTS: Photographs, Resume Community Development Board — April 21, 2015 FLD2014-12034 — Page 22 View looking north at the subject property. View from the subject property looking southwest. View looking NW at accessory docks on north side of s�rbject property (City Marina in background) View looking northwest at the subject property and the adjacent hotel. View looking NE at east side of subject property (east portion zoned LMDR District) View looking east of the subject property. 40 Devon Drive Case FLD2015-02006 Matthew Jackson 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 (727) 562-4504 matthew. iacksonna.mvclea rwater.com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE ❑ Planner III February 2013 to present Ciry of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida Duties include performing the technical review and preparation of staff reports for various land development applications, the organization of data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports, and making presentations to various City Boards and Committees. ❑ Planner II City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida May 2011 to February 2013 October 2008 to June 2010 Regulate growth and development of the City in accordance with land resource ordinances and regulations related to community development. Landscape plan review including: conceptual, and variance. Reviews and analyzes site plans and conducts field studies to determine the integrity of development plans and their compatibility with surroundings. Interdepartmental and zoning assistance. Respond as a City representative to citizens, City officials, and businesses concerning ordinances and regulations. Make recommendations and presentations at staff level at various review committees, boards, and meetings. ❑ Planner I Calvin-Giordano and Associates, Fort Lauderdale, Florida May 2005 to December 2007 Project manager for various development applications such as plat, site plan, rezoning and variances. In-depth government agency, in-house and client coordination to ensure that the projects maintained submittal schedules stayed within budget constraints and attained approval. Schedule and lead project kick-off ineetings, ensure municipal project conditions were resolved, produce supporting documents and make site visits as well. Research and prepare due diligence reports including subject matter such as zoning, land uses, densities, available public utilities and land development costs. Member of emergency mitigation committee formed to prepare and mitigate for natural or man-made disasters affecting Calvin, Giordano and Associates and local municipalities. ❑ Manager Church Street Entertainment, Orlando, Florida September 1999 to February 2004 Supervised and managed daytime and nighttime operations of a bar and nightclub entertainment complex including 100+ staff. Conducted hiring and training operations including security and inventory control. Managed and reconciled nightly gross revenues as well as preparing and delivering deposits. Assisted in taking inventory and preparing weekly inventory orders, marketing and special events. ❑ Linguist US Army, Fort Campbell, KY October 1991 to October 1995 Maintain fluency in the Arabic language and knowledge of customs and culture as well as military readiness for possible deployments or training operations. Co-managed intelligence gathering operation in Haiti including coordination between multiple Special Forces units and civilian authorities. Interpreter between U.S. and Egyptian soldiers during training exercises. Liaison between Special Forces battalions to coordinate certification training. EDUCATION ❑ Master of Arts, Urban and Regional Planning, Florida Atlantic University, 2007 ❑ Bachelor of Arts, Urban and Regional Planning, Rollins College, 2004 FLD2015-02006 40 Devon Dr. � 2015 Attachment E Beach by Design Criteria a) Density: DES/GN RESPONSE: The project will maintain an overnight accommodation density of 148 units per acre based on a 0. 659 acre parce/ for a tota/ of 98 units. This includes 85 base density units comprised of 32 Base Units p/us 53 Units obtained previous/y from the Hote/ Density Pool - FLD2013-02007, plus an additional 13 Density Units current/y requested from the density pool.) (APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL) b) Height & Separation: DES/GN RESPONSE: The additiona/ maximum base f/ood e/evation on site is (VE) 13 feet. The maximum allowab/e building height is 1 DO feet above the base flood e/evation. The proposed building height is 100 feet zero inches above the base f/ood elevation maximum to top of roof, and 112 feet zero inches to top of roof top mechanical and stair towers. c) Design, Scale and Mass of Building: 1. Buildings with a footprint of greater than 5000 square feet or a single dimension of greater than one hundred (100) feet will be constructed so that no more than two (2) of the three (3) building dimensions in the vertical or horizontal planes are equal in length. For this purpose, equal in length means that the two lengths vary by less than forty (40%) of the shorter of the two (2) lengths. The horizontal plan measurements relate to the footprint of the building. DES/GN RESPONSE: The shape of the project site is close to a square, the first three floors of the building, the garage, maintains similar width and length dimensions; however the height of the base is significantly /ess than either of the two other dimensions. Above the garage base the tower portion maintains about a two to one width to length dimension. 2. No plane of a building may continue uninterrupted for greater than one hundred linear feet (100'). For the purpose of this standard, interrupted means an offset of greater than five feet (5'). DESIGN RESPONSE: 1 FLD2015-02006 40 Devon Dr.' 2015 The proposed design adds many horizontal steps in the building facades such that no one surface is longer than 100 feet without a break in the fa�ade. See attached p/ans and e/evations, 3. At least sixty percent (60%) of any elevation will be covered with windows or architectural decoration. For the purpose of this standard, an elevation is that portion of a building that is visible from a particular point outside the parcel proposed for development. DES/GN RESPONSE: In the proposed elevation desic composed of windows, balconies, facade is comprised of a minii decoration. See attached plans and e/evations n, a significant portion or articulated farade. Ti num 60% of windows of each fa�ade is e result is that each and/or architectural 4. No more than sixty percent (60%) of the theoretical maximum building envelope located above forty-five feet (45') will be occupied by a building. However, in those instances where an overnight accommodations use on less than 2.0 acres that has been allocated additional density via the Hotel Density Reserve, no more than seventy-�ve percent (75%) of the theoretical maximum building envelope located above forty-five feet (45') may be occupied by a building unless the property is located between Gulfview Boulevard and the Gulf of Mexico, then no more than 70% may be occupied by a building. DES/GN RESPONSE: The proposed design occupies approximate/y 35% of the "Theoretica/ Building Envelope" above 45'. This is significantly less than the allowable 75%. See attached p/ans and e/evations, 5. The height and mass of buildings will be correlated to: (1) the dimensional aspects of the parcel of the parcel proposed for development and (2) adjacent public spaces such as streets and parks. DES/GN RESPONSE: The building height is maintained at 100-feet. The height is allowed for in Beach by Design See attached p/ans and e/evations, 6. Buildings may be designed for a vertical or horizontal mix of permitting uses. DES/GN RESPONSE: 2 FLD2015-02006 40 Devon Dr. j 2015 The building will be designed to provide dining, recreation, and a mix of uses typical in a limited service Hotel. d) Setbacks 8� Stepbacks: 1. Rights-of-way. The area between the building and the edge of the pavement as existing and planned should be sufficiently wide to create a pedestrian-friendly environment. The distances from structures to the edge of the right-of-way should be: a) Fifteen feet (15') along arterials, b) Twelve feet (12') along local streets. DES/GN RESPONSE: The design proposes the required 15' setback a/ong 1Sr St. and Devon Drive for a portion of the building frontage, then the building stepback increases to 20' and 25'. 2. Side and Rear Setbacks Except for the setbacks set forth above, no side or rear setback lines are recommended, except as may be required to comply with the City's Fire Code. DES/GN RESPONSE: A 10' setback is proposed a/ong the west property line. We are a/so proposing a 0 feet setback to pavement and 4 foot setback, to structure, a/ong the existing seawal/, with the building above cantilevering 8' to a 10 foot setback 3. Coronado Drive Setbacks and Stepbacks. To reduce upper story massing along the street and ensure a human scale street environment, buildings using the hotel density reserve along Coronado Drive shall be constructed in accordance with the following: a. Buildings constructed with a front setback of fifteen feet (15') or more shall stepback with a minimum depth of fifteen feet (15') from the setback line at a height not more than twenty-five feet (25'). DES/GN RESPONSE: N/A b. Buildings constructed with a front setback greater than or equal to ten feet (10') and less than fifteen feet (15') shall stepback at a height not more than finrenty feet (20'). The required stepback/ setback ratio 3 FLD2015-02006 40 Devon Dr. I 2015 is one and one-half feet (1.5') for every one foot (1') reduction in setback in addition to the minimum stepback of fifteen feet (15'). DES/GN RESPONSE: N/,4 c. Buildings constructed with a front setback of less than ten feet (10') shall provide a building stepback required stepback/ setback ratio is two and one-half feet (2.5') for every one foot (1') reduction in setback in addition to the minimum stepback of fifteen feet (15'). DES/GN RESPONSE: N/A d. To achieve stepbacks rr building sh, neighboring upper story facade variety and articulation, additional iay be required. To avoid a monotonous streetscape, a all not replicate the stepback configuration of the buildings including those across rights-of-way. DES/GN RESPONSE: N/A e. Required stepbacks shall span a minimum of 75% of the building frontage width. DES/GN RESPONSE: N/A e) Street-Level Facades The human scale and aesthetic appeal of street-level facades, and their relationship to the sidewalk, are essential to a pedestrian-friendly environment. Accordingly: At least sixty percent (60%) of the street level facades of buildings used for nonresidential purposes which abut a public street or pedestrian access way, will be transparent. For the purpose of this standard: a) street level facade means that portion of a building facade from ground level to a height of twelve feet (12') DES/GN RESPONSE: At /east 60% of the street leve/ facades are transparent. The facades open to the insef building entry and drop-off area. The garage is decorative/y screened with meta/ screening. Additiona/ly, as defined be/ow, the buildings step back 15 feet 4 FLD2015-02006 40 Devon Dr. � 2015 or more from the street front facades, so the streetscapes are effectively 100% transparent. See attached p/ans and e/evations, b) transparent means windows or doors that allow pedestrians to see into: the building, or ii. landscaped or hardscaped courtyard or plazas, where street level facades are set back at least fifteen feet (15') from the edge of the sidewalk and the area between the sidewalk and the facade is a landscaped or hardscaped courtyard DES/GN RESPONSE: The buildings step back 15 feet or more from the street front facades, so the streetscapes are effective/y 100% transparent. See attached p/ans and e/evations, c) Parking structures should utilize architectural details and design elements such a false recessed windows, arches, planter boxes, metal grillwork, etc. instead of transparent alternatives. When a parking garage abuts a public road or other public place, it will be designed such that the function of the building is not readily apparent except at points of ingress and egress. DES/GN RESPONSE: The design proposes decorative/y screened and articu/ated garage openings on the first two leve/s. At the 2nd /eve/ we propose undecorated garage openings, however, the openings will still be modu/ated to coordinate with the general rhythm and pattern of the other building fa�ade openings and windows. The openings in the parking area at the 3rd f/oor /evel is pulled back minimally 15 feet from the face of the building, effective/y hiding the openings from pedestrian and higher /evels. See attached plans and e%vations, 2. Window coverings, and other opaque materials may cover not more than 10% of the area of any street-level window in a nonresidential building that fronts on a public right-of way. DES/GN RESPONSE: Not more than 10% of the area of any street-level windows are opaqued, 3. Building entrances should be aesthetically inviting and easily identified. Goods for sale will not be displayed outside of a building, except as a permitted temporary use. This standard does not apply to outdoor food service establishments. 5 FLD2015-02006 40 Devon Dr. I 2015 DES/GN RESPONSE: Acknow/edged, there are no retail accessory spaces p/anned for this building. 4. Awnings and other structures that offer pedestrians cover from the elements are recommended. Awnings help define entryways and provide storefront identity to both pedestrians and drivers. DES/GN RESPONSE: The design proposes a high/y articulated building fa�ade that differentiates the residentia/ tower from the more average garage portion. At the garage entry we are proposing a two story decorative and articu/ated entrance. These fa�ade articu/ations will serve to identify the available hote/ activity areas and entrances. See attached p/ans and e/evations � Parking Areas To create a well-defined and aesthetically appealing street boundary, all parking areas will be separated from public rights of way by a landscaped decorative wall, fence or other opaque landscape treatment of not less than three feet (3') and not more than three and one-half feet (3'/2') in height. SurFace parking areas that are visible from public streets or other public places will be landscaped such that the parking areas are defined more by their landscaping materials than their paved areas when viewed from adjacent property. The use of shade trees is encouraged in parking lots. However, care should be taken to choose trees that do not drop excessive amounts of leaves, flowers, or seeds on the vehicles below. Entrances to parking areas should be clearly marked in order to avoid confusion and minimize automobile-pedestrian conflicts. Attractive signage and changes to the texture of the road (such as pavers) are recommended. When a parking garage abuts a public road or other public place, it will be designed such that the function of the building is not readily apparent except at points of ingress and egress. DESIGN RESPONSE: The design proposes decorative/y screened and articu/ated garage openings on the firsf two /evels. At the second level we propose undecorated garage openings, however, the openings will still be modulated to coordinate with the genera/ rhythm and pattern of the other building fa�ade openings and windows. The openings in the parking area at the 3�d f/oor level is pulled back minimally 15 feet from the face of the building, effective/y hiding the openings from pedestrian and higher /eve/s. See attached p/ans and e/evations, g) Signage 6 FLD2015-02006 40 Devon Dr. � 2015 Signage is an important contributor to the overall character of a place. However, few general rules apply to signage. Generally, signage should be creative, unique, simple, and discrete. Blade signs, banners and sandwich boards should not be discouraged, but signs placed on the sidewalk should not obstruct pedestrian traffic. DES/GN RESPONSE: Signage shall be designed per code and submitted for approva/ a/ong with the building permit. h) Sidewalks Sidewalks along arterials and retail streets should be at least ten feet (10') in width. All sidewalks along arterials and retail streets will be landscaped with palm trees, spaced to a maximum of thirty-five feet (35') on centers, with "clear grey" of not less than eight feet (8'). Acceptable palm trees include sabal palms (sabal palmetto), medjool palms (phoenix dactylifera `medjool'), and canary island date palms (phoenix canariensis). Sidewalks along side streets will be landscaped with palms (clear trunk of not less than eight feet (8')) or shade trees, spaced at maximum intervals of thirty- five feet (35') on centers. Portions of required sidewalks may be improved for nonpedestrian purposes including outdoor dining and landscape material, provided that: 1. Movement of pedestrians along the sidewalk is not obstructed; and non- pedestrian improvements and uses are located on the street side of the sidewalk. Distinctive paving patterns should be used to separate permanent sidewalk cafe improvements from the pedestrian space on the sidewalk. To enhance pedestrian safety and calm traffic, distinctive paving should also be used to mark crosswalks. DESIGN RESPONSE: Sidewalks, a/ong the building frontage, sha/l align with the existing adjacent sidewalks and shall match the width of the existing adjacent sidewalks. Landscaping shall be designed per code and shall be submitted for approva/ at DRC application. i) Street Furniture and Bicycle Racks Street furniture, including benches and trash receptacles should be liberally placed along the sidewalks, at intervals no greater than thirty linear feet (30') of sidewalk. Bicycle racks should also be provided, especially near popular destinations, to promote transportation alternatives. Complicated bicycle rack systems should be avoided. The 7 FLD2015-02006 40 Devon Dr. � 2015 placement of street furniture and bicycle racks should not interrupt pedestrian traffic on the sidewalk. DES/GN RESPONSE: Street Benches and trash receptac/es area proposed a/ong Devon Drive and shall be designed per code and submitted for approva/ at building permit. Bicycle racks will be provided within the ground f/oor garage. j) Street Lighting Street lighting should respond to the pedestrian-oriented nature of a tourist destination. In this context, it should balance the functional with the attractive — providing adequate light to vehicular tra�c, while simultaneously creating intimate spaces along the sidewalks. Clearwater's historic lighting is an attractive, single-globe fixture atop a cast-iron pole. DESIGN RESPONSE: Street lighting, if provided by this owner, shall be designed per code and submitted for approval at building permit. k) Fountains Fountains provide attractive focal points to public spaces and add natural elements to urban environments. They should be interesting, engaging and unique. While it is important not to overburden architectural creativity regarding fountains, they should meet at least the following standards in order to be a functional and attractive component of the public space: 1. They should be supplemented with street furniture such as benches and trash receptacles, and 2. They should have rims that are: a. Tall enough to limit unsupervised access by small children, and b. Wide enough to permit seating. Fountains should be encouraged in landscaped and hardscaped courtyards and plazas. DES/GN RESPONSE: There are no fountains p/anned for the property, at this time. L. Materials and Colors 1. Facades $ FLD2015-02006 40 Devon Dr. � 2015 Finish materials and building colors will reflect Florida or coastal vernacular themes. All awnings should contain at least three (3) distinct colors. Bright colors will be limited to trims and other accents. Glass curtain walls are prohibited. DES/GN RESPONSE: The building colors are p/anned as a lighter and darker beige, sand and white, to coordinate with its sister building, Pier 60, next door. All co/ors proposed are to follow the BbD co/or palate. Please see Architectura/ exhibits. 2. Sidewalks Sidewalks will be constructed of: a. Pavers; b. Patterned, distressed, or special aggregate concrete; Or c. Other finished treatment that distinguishes the sidewalks from typical suburban concrete sidewalks. Materials should be chosen to minimize the cost and complexity of maintenance. DES/GN RESPONSE: Proposed sidewa/ks will be designed using several coordinating paver sty/es as well as concrete. 3. Street Furniture Street furniture will be constructed of low-maintenance materials, and will be in a color that is compatible with its surroundings. DES/GN RESPONSE: There are no benches being proposed current/y, for this proposal. 4. Color Palette A recommended palette for building colors is presented on the following page. DES/GN RESPONSE; The building shal/ utilize the BbD co/or pa/ates. P/ease see Architectura/ exhibits. 9 ° Clearwater U Planning & Development Department Flexible Development Application Attached Dwellings, Mixed-Uses orNon-Residential Uses fT IS INCUMBENT UPON THE APPLICANT TO SUBMIT COMPLETE AND CORRECT INFORMATION. ANY MISLEADIN6, DECEPTIVE, INCOMPLETE OR INCORRECi INPORMATION MAY INVALIDATE YOUR APPLICATION. ALL APPLICATIONS ARE TO BE FILLED OUT COMPLETELY AND CORRECTLY, AND SUBMITTED IN PERSON (NO FAX OR DEUVERIES) TO THE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY NOON ON THE SCHEDULED DEADLINE DATE. A TOTAL OF 11 COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS ANQ APPLICATION MATERIALS (1 ORIGINAL AND 10 COPIES) AS REQUIRED WITHIN ARE TO BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW BY THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE. SUBSEQUENT SUBMITTAL FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD WILL REQUIRE 15 COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS AND APPLICATION MATERIAlS (1 ORiGINAL AND 14 COPIES). PLANS AND APPLICATIONS ARE REQUIRED TO BE COLLATED, STAPLED AND FOLDED INTO SETS. THE APPLICANT, BY FIUNG THIS APPLICATION, AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE. FIRE DEPT PREUMARY SITE PLAN REVIEW FEE: $ZOO APPLICATION FEE: $1,205 PR�PERTY OWNER (PER DEED): �.��P SPa C`.aYtain L 1 G. MAIIING ADDRESS: 13555 Bishops Ct. Brookfield Wisconsin 53005 PHONE NUMBER: 262-797-9215 EMAIL: AGENT OR REPRESENTATIVE• Synergy Civil Engineering, Inc (M'tchae! J. Palmer, P.E) MAI LI N G ADDRESS: 3000 Gulf to Bay Blvd Suite 20l PHONE NUMBER: 727-796-1926 EMAIL: mpabner�a,synergycivileng.com ADDRESS OF SUBIECT PROPERTY: 40 Devon drive, Clearwater, FL 33767 PARCEL NUMBER(S): 08-29-IS-D0000-320-0300 LEGAL DESCRIPTtON: See PROPOSED USE(S): 98 Room Hotel DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: „A., Specifically identify the request SEEATTACHMENT "B" (include a!I requested code }lexibifity,• e.g., reduction in required number oj parking spaces, heigh� setbacks, lot size, lot width, specific use, etc.J: Planning 8 Development Deparlment,100 5. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwaber, FL 33756, Tel: 727�62�567; Fax: 727-562�865 Page 1 of 8 Revised 01112 ° Clearwater U Planning & Development Department Flexible Development Application Data Sheet PLEASE ENSURE THAT THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS FILLED OUT, IN ITS ENTIRETY. FAILURE TO COMPLETE THIS FORM WILL RESULT IN YOUR APPLICATION BEING FOUND INCOMPLETE AND POSSIBLY DEFERRED UNTIL THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION CYCLE. ZONING DISTRICT: FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATION: EXISTING USE (currently existing on site): Tourist Dutrict "T"/ (LMDR) Resort Facilities High "RFH & RU" Aotels and Single-Family Residential PROPOSED USE (new use, if any; plus existing, if to remain):Aotel and (Single Family Residential) 28,688 sJ("T" District) 0.659 "T" SITE AREA: 7,473 sf ("LMDR" District) Sq, ft, 0.172 "LMDR" acres 36,161 sf (Total) 0.831 Total GROSS FLOOR AREA (total square footage of all buildings): Existing: 12,728 sq. ft. Proposed: SS,ZSO Sq ft 55,250 BLG. + 56,560PARKING GARAGE =111,8I0 SF. Maximum Allowable: NA sq. ft. GROSS FLOOR AREA (total square footage devoted to each use, if there will be multiple uses): First use: 48,335 sq. ft.Hotel Second use: 6,915 <(12.5%) Sq, ft,Accessory Third use: N�A sq. ft. FLOOR AREA RATIO (total square footage of all buiidings divided by the total square footage of entire site): Existing: 0.35 Proposed: N/A (12.5% accessory use < IS%) Allowable) Maximum Allowable: N/�1 BUILDING COVERAGE/FOOTPRINT (ln floor square footage of all buildings}: 7,185 Existing: sq. ft. ( 25 % of site) Proposed: 21,790 sq. ft. ( 76 % of site) Maximum Permitted: 27,253 sq. ft. ( 9S 4G of site) GREEN SPACE WITHIN VEHICULAR USE AREA (green space within the parking lot and interior of site; not perimeter buffer): Existing: 0.0 sq. ft. ( 0.0 % of sitej Proposed: N/A Parking sq. ft. ( 0.0 % of site) Garage VEHICULAR USE AREA (parking spaces, drive aisles, loading area): Existing: 1 �� �98 sq. ft. ( 62 % of site) Proposed: N/A Parking sq. ft. ( 0.0 % of site) Garage Planning 8 DevelopmeM Deparbner►t, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727�624567; Fax: 727�62-4865 Page 2 ot 8 Revised 01112 IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RATIO �total square footage of impervious areas divided by the total sq�are footage of entire site}: Existing: 24>160s.f. � 84 Praposed: - � �� ,3•3�/ � �• �� Maximum Permitted: 27,296sj. = 0.95 �ENSITY (units, rooms or beds per acre): BUIlDING HEIGHT: Existing: 129 DU/aa F�cisting: 26'+/- Proposed: .�� 7 DU/aa (Approved by City Coxncit} proposed: I�' �� BFE =13. D Maximum Permitted: 150DU/a� Maximum Permitted: j00'BFE=I3.0 OFF-STREET PARKING: Existing: 36 Proposed: 178 Minimum Required: j•Z X 98= 118 �/'hi/1.) WHAT IS'�HE ESTIMATED TOTAL VALUE OF TIiE PROJECT UPOM COMPtFTION? $ 10,9DO,OBQ00 ZONING DtSTRICTS FOR ALL ADJACENT PROPERTY: North: Tourist South: Tourist East: LMDR West: Tourist STATE OF fLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all Sworn to and subscribed before me this day of representations made in this application are true and , to me andJor by accurate to ihe best of my knowledge and authorize City r resentatives to visit and photograph the who is personally kr�own has pro erty escribed in this applicati�n_ prod�ced ' ntification. i1 � :,� ^ ,�._---- owner or represeMative Notary public, My tommission expires: / < Planning 8� Devabpment �epartrneM, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-S62�A567: Faz: 727-b62�865 Page 3 af 8 12evlsed 01/12 o Planning & Development Department � C earwater Flexible Develo ment A lication P PP � Site Plan Submittal Package Check list IN ADDITION TO THE COMPLETED FLIXIBLE DEVELOPMENT (FLD) APPLICATION, ALL FLD APPLICATIONS SHALL INCLUDE A SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL PACKAGE THAT INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION AND/OR PLANS: ❑ Responses to the flexibility criteria for the specific use(s) being requested as set forth in the Zoning District(s) in which the subject property is located. The attached Fiexible Development Application Flexibility Criteria sheet shall be used to provide these responses. ❑ Responses to the General Appiicability criteria set forth in Section 3-914.A. The attached Flexible Development Appiication General Applicability Criteria sheet shall be used to provide these responses. ❑ A signed and sealed survey of the property prepared by a registered land surveyor including the location of the properry, dimensions, acreage, location of all current strudures/improvements, location of all public and private easements including official records book and page numbers and street right(s)-of-way within and adjacent to the site. ❑ If the application would result in the removal or relocation of mobile home owners residing in a mobile home park as provided in F.S. § 723.083, the application must provide that information required by Seclion 4-202.A.5. ❑ If this application is being submitted for the purpose of a boatlift, catwalk, davit, dock, marina, pier, seawall or other si milar marine structure, then the application must provide detailed plans and specifications prepared by a Florida professional engineer, bearing the seal and signature of the engineer, except signed and sealed plans shall not be required for the repair or replacement of decking, stringers, railing, lower landings, tie piles, or the patching or reinforcing of existing piling on private and commercial docks. ❑ A site plan prepared by a professional architect, engineer or landscape architect drawn to a minimum scale of one inch equals 50 feet on a sheet size not to exceed 24 inches by 36 inches that includes the following information: ❑ Index sheet of the same size shall be included with individual sheet numbers referenced thereon. ❑ North arrow, scale, location map and date prepared. ❑ Idenfification of the boundaries of phases, if development is proposed to be constructed in phases. ❑ Location of the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL), whether the property is located within a Special Flood Hazard Area, and the Base Flood Elevation (BFE) of the property, as applicable. ❑ Location, footprint and size of all existing and proposed buildings and structures on the site. ❑ Location and dimensions of vehicular and pedestrian circulation systems, both on-site and off-site, with proposed points of access. ❑ Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks, curbs, water lines, sanitary sewer lines, storm drains, fire hydrants and seawalls and any proposed utility easements. ❑ Location of onsite and offsite stormwater management facilities as well as a narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including calculations. Additional data necessary to demonstrate comptiance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual may be required at time of building construction permit. ❑ Location of solid waste collection facilities, required screening and provisions for accessibility for collection. ❑ Location of off-street loading area, if required by Section 3-1406. ❑ All adjacent right(s)-of-way, with indication of centerline and width, paved width, existing median cuts and intersections and bus shelters. ❑ Dimensions of existing and proposed lot lines, streets, drives, building lines, setbacks, structural overhangs and building separations. ❑ Building or structure elevation drawings that depict the proposed building height and building materials. Planning 8� Development Departrnent, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727�562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 4 of 8 Revised 01/12 ❑ Typical floor plans, including floor plans for each floor of any parking garage. ❑ Demolition plan. ❑ Identification and description of watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, specimen trees, and other environmentally sensitive areas. ❑ If a deviation from the parking standards is requested that is greater than 50% (excluding those standards where the difference between the top and bottom of the range is one parking space), then a parking demand study will need to be provided. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved. Please see the adopted Parking Demand Study Guidelines for further informafion. ❑ A tree survey showing the location, DBH and species of all existing trees with a DBH of four inches or more, and identifying those trees proposed to be removed, if any. ❑ A tree inventory, prepared by a certified arborist, of all trees fou� inches DBH or more that reflects the size, canopy, and condition of such trees may be required if deemed applicable by staff. Check with staff. ❑ A Traffic Impact Study shall be required for all proposed developments if the total generated net new trips meet one or more of the following conditions: ■ Proposal is expected to generate 100 or more new trips in any given hour (directional trips, inbound or outbound on the abutting streets) and/or 1,000 or more new trips per day; or ■ Anticipated new trip generation degrades the level of service as adopted in the City's Comprehensive Plan to unacceptable levels; or ■ The study area contains a segment of roadway and/or intersection with five reportable accidents within a prior twelve month period, or the segment and/or intersection exists on the Cit�/s annual list of most hazardous locations, provided by the City of Clearwater Police Department; or ■ The Traffic Operations Manager or their designee deems it necessary to require such assessment in the plan review process. Examples include developments that are expected to negatively impact a constrained roadway or developments with unknown trip generation and/or other unknown factors. D A landscape plan shall be provided for any project where there is a new use or a change of use; or an existing use is improved or remodeled in a value of 25% or more of the valuation of the principal structure as reflected on the property app�aiser's current records, or if an amendment is required to an existing approved site plan; or a parking lot requires additional landscaping pursuant to the provisions of Article 3, Division 14. The landscape plan shall include the fotlowing information, if not otherwise required in conjunction with the application for development approval: ❑ Location, size, description, specificafions and quantities of alt existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names. O Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and location, including drip line. ❑ Interior landscape areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressed both in square feet, exclusive of perimeter landscaped strips, and as a percentage of the paved area coverage of the parking lot and vehicular use areas. - ❑ Location of existing and proposed sYructures and improvements, including but not limited to sidewalks, walls, fences, pools, patios, dumpster pads, pad mounted transformers, fire hydrants, overhead obstructions, curbs, water lines, sanitary sewer lines, storm drains, seawalls, utility easements, treatment of all ground surFaces, and any other features that may influence the proposed landscape. ❑ Location of parking areas and other vehicular use areas, including parking spaces, circulation aisles, interior landscape islands and curbing. ❑ Drainage and retention areas, including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations. ❑ Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscaped buffers including sight triangles, if any. Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727 562�567; Fax: 727-562-d865 Page 5 of 8 Revised 01112 ° Clearwater � Planning & Development Department Flexible Development Application � General Applicability Criteria PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO EACH OF THE SIX (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA IXPLAINING HOW, IN DETAIL, THE CRITERION IS BEING COMPLIED WITH PER THIS DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL. 1. The proposed development of the land wili be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. SEE ATTACHMENT "C" 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development wiil not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community charader of the immediate vicinity of the partel proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. Planning 8 Devebpmerrt Departrnent, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727562-4567; Fax: 727-562�865 Page 6 of 8 Revised 0'1N2 ° Clearwater � Planning & Development Department Flexible Development Application Flexibilitv Criteria PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO THE APPLICABLE FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR THE SPECIFIC USE(S) BEIN6 REQUESTED AS SET FORTH IN THE ZONIN6 DISTRICT(S) IN WHICH THE SUBIECT PROPERTY IS IOCATED. EXPLAIN HOW, IN DETAIL, EACH CRITERION IS BEING COMPUED WITH PER THIS DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL (USE SEPARATE SHEETS AS NECESSARY). �. SEE A7TACHMENT "D" ►.� � 4. 5. 6. 8. Planning 8 Devebpment Depariment, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562�4567; Fa�c: M7�62-4865 Page 7 of 8 Revised 01h2 Q Planning & Development Department � � eaxvvater Flexible Development Application " Affidavit to Authorize Agent/Representative 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed — PRINT full names: Decade Sea Captain, LLC Je,,Q`'Xeierleber, Parbier 2. That (i am/we are) the owne�{sj and record title holder(sj of the following described property: Oweer 40 Dtvon Drive, C[enrwater, FL 33767 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for (descrihe reguest): Construction of a 98 room hote! 118 space parldnggaraae and associated utilities. 4. That the undersigned (has/havej appoirrted and �does/do� appoint: Synergy Civil Engineerutg, lh� (Mickae[ J. Palmer), Beha� Petenanecz, letG (Lstvan L PeteranecrJ, Joe Burdede as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents ne�essary ta affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of CEearwater, Fiorida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and ihe owner authorize�C y representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. That ( Property Owner Property Owner hereby certify that tbe foregoing is true and correct. STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PiNELLAS Property Owner Property Qwner BEFORE ME THE UNDERSIGNED, AN OFFICER DULY COMMISSIONED BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, ON THIS D Y,pF . PERS()NALLY APPEARED WHO HAVING BEEN FIRST DULY SWORN SAYS fiHAT HE/SHE FUtLY UNDERSTANDS THE CONTENTS OF THE AFFIDAVIT THAT HE/SHE 51GNER. �°°., w � ow+�eaes �E ��� ������ t' �'` EXPIR� Febn+ery 23, 2D18 �' . . aad�dtlw►b1�YP1�t�•� Notary ` { ir`a�f .l�/ NoRary� Ii ig� /� My Commission Expires: , Plannin9 8 Devaiopment Departrnen� 100 5. Myrtle Avenue, Ciearwater, FL 33T56, Tel: T27�Z�4587; Fax: 72Tfi62-486b Paga 8 af 8 Revfeed 01 H 2 40 Devon Dr. I 2015 Attachment A Legal Description DESCRIPTION (BY DEUEL & ASSOCIATES) Lots 1 and 2, BAYSIDE SUBDIVISION, as recorded in Plat Book 23, Page 18 and 19, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. Together with a tract of land lying In Section 8, Township 29 South, Range 15 East, Pinellas County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of Water Lot 1, CITY PARK SUBDIVISION, as recorded in Plat Book 23, Page 37, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida; thence West, along the East and West centerline of said Section 8, a distance of 15.00 feet to the Easterly right-of-way of Coronado Drive; thence S.05°32'30"W. along said Easterly right-of-way of Coronado Drive, a distance of 116.2fi feet to the Northerly right-of-way of First Avenue; thence S.84�5'33"E. along said North right-of-way of First Avenue, a distance of 99.92 feet to the point of beginning; thence N.05°43'48"E., a distance of 178.11 feet to a point on the centerline of an existing concrete seawall; thence along said centerline of the existing concrete seawall the following Eleven (11) courses and distances: (1) S.83�6'46"E., a distance of 78.43 feet, (2) Easterly along a curve to the right having a radius of 195.34 feet, an arc of 29.59 feet, a chord of 29.56 feet and a chord bearing of S.78°08'53"E., (3) Southeasterly along a curve to the right having a radius of 184.81 feet, an arc of 39.63 feet, a chord of 39.55 feet and a chord bearing of S.67°23'14"E., (4) S.55°02'38"E., a distance of 11.52 feet, (5) S.52°13'39"E., a distance of 15.22 feet, (6) Southeasterly along a curve to the right having a radius of 210.97 feet, an arc of 39.26 feet, a chord of 39.20 feet and a chord bearing of S.45°10'29"E., (7) S.31 °18'16"E., a distance of 21.66 feet, (8) S.30 °11'51 "E., a distance of 11.36 feet, (9) S.30 �3'47"E., a distance of 44.42 feet, (10) S.30°40'13"E., a distance of 36.72 feet, (11) Southeasterly along a curve to the right having a radius of 198.30 feet, an arc of 14.06 feet, a chord of 14.06 feet and a chord bearing of S.27°09'16"E. to the South boundary line of aforesaid Lot 2(as occupied); thence N.84°27'50'W. along said South boundary line of Lot 2(as occupied), a distance of 104.63 feet; thence S.70°43'12"W., a distance of 45.94 feet to aforesaid North right-of-way of First Avenue; thence N.84°27'30"W, along said North right-of-way of First Avenue, a distance of 128.11 feet to the Point of Beginning. Containing 0.83 acres, more or less. ALSO: A PART OF that tract, piece or parcel of land which adjoins said Lots 1 and 2, BAYSIDE SUBDIVISION, as recorded in Plat Book 23, Pages 18 and 19, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, and lies between Lots 1 and 2 and 1 40 Devon Dr. I 2015 the bulkhead line shown on the map or plat above referenced to, said land being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the SE Corner of Lot 2 and run thence S.84°27'04"E. 15 feet to the bulkhead line shown on said map or plat; thence along said bulkhead line and a curve to the left, having a radius of 223.53 feet, an arc of 70.73 feet, a chord of 70.44 feet and a chord bearing of N.25°12'05"W., to the point of intersection of said bulkhead line with the projection of the North property line of said Lot 2, said point being 35 feet east of the northeast corner of said Lot 2; thence continue along said bulkhead line and a curve to the left, having a radius of 223.53 feet, an arc of 83.28 feet, a chord of 82.80 feet and a chord bearing of N.44°56'24"W., to the intersection of said bulkhead line with the centerline of an existing concrete seawall; thence along said centerline of the existing concrete seawall with the following: along a curve to the right, having a radius of 210.97, an arc of 13.54 feet, a chord of 13.54 feet and a chord bearing of S.41 °40'S9"E.; thence S.31 °18'16"E. 21.66 feet; thence S.30°11'S1"E. 11.36 feet; thence S.30°23'47"E. 44.42 feet; thence S.30°40'13"E. 36.72 feet; thence along a curve to the right, having a radius of 198.30 feet, an arc of 14.06 feet, a chord of 14.06 feet and a chord bearing of S.27°09'16"E., to the Point of Beginning. Containing 0.045 acres, more or less. � 40 Devon Dr. I 2015 Attachment B Description of Request 1. Increase building Height to 100' above BFE 13' 2. Request building setback at ground elevation: Front South =15.00 Side West = 10.00 Rear North = 0.00 (To Deck) Side East = N/A (Rear Yard) 3. Request sidewalk & pavement setback: Front South =15.00 Side West = 5.00 (To Sidewalk) Rear North = 0.00 (To Deck) Side East = N/A (Rear Yard) 4. Two year development agreement 1 40 Devon Drive I 201� Attachment C General Applicability Criteria 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. West: The properiy to the west is the Pier House 60 Hotel. North: The property to the north is the Clearwater Harbor/ seawall. East: The property to the east is the Clearwater Harbor/ seawall.. South: The property to the south includes Devon Drive right of way a residential building to the southeast and a City of Clearwater Parking Lot. The scale, bulk, coverage and density of the proposed project are in keeping with the Design Guidelines set forth in Beach by Design for the Small Motel District. The proposed hotel project maintains the existing use, and maintains a maximum height of 100" foot above BFE=13. The proposed project will enhance this area of the beach in a number of ways, including: • Demolition and Re-Development of an older hotel site. • Construction of a new hotel consistent with new City code and Beach by Design criteria. • Upgrade in landscaping from a minimal condition, to areas of planting and grassed open space and ha�dscape areas. • Providing a destination hotel on Clearwater Beach. • Setting an example in a Beach by Design district that will likely inspire new development in the area. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The proposed development maintains an existing appropriate land use according to Beach by Design with a limited service hotel that caters to families and established clientele. The project includes adequate off- street parking. The new project will provide a positive example along the Devon Drive to serve as a catalyst for redevelopment of new hotels and mixed use development. This will have a positive impact on the value of the adjacent land and also provide clientele for the surrounding restaurants and retail shops. � � 40 Devon Drive I 2015 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The proposed development will be designed meet all state, federal and local codes with respect to fire safety, potable water, sanitary sewer, traffic and pedestrian safety. The development will create code compliant sidewalks for pedestrian safety and will encourage persons living and working in the area to visit the proposed retail shops. The proposed hotel maintains the existing use and does not introduce any new businesses that may adversely affect the health of persons residing or working in the area. The proposed structure will comply as required with applicable codes including the Florida Building Code, the Life Safety Code and the Florida Fire Prevention Code. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. The results of a traffic study performed for this development indicates the project will not cause significant increased traffic congestion. The development will include a code compliant parking count (118 parking spaces) which can be significantly increased by making use of valet parking during high occupancy periods. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity proposed for developmen� The proposed redevelopment project will improve the visual appeal near the north entry to Pier 60 and Small Motel Districts. The architectural style integrates a beach contemporary design which is appropriate and aesthetically pleasing for the Small Hotel District. The development maintains the existing use of the property and is consistent with the properties to the north and south. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. The building includes enhanced design elements on the fa�ade as required by Beach by Design including adequate windows, vertical and horizontal plane changes and recommended color palette. The acoustic and olfactory impacts are minimized by providing the all of the parking within an enclosed parking garage. Hours of operation will be 24/7 which is consistent with surrounding properties catering to the tourist industry. � 40 Devon Drive f 201.5 Attachment D Applicable Flezibility Criteria Comprehensive Infill 1. The development or redevetopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning distric� The site is the recipient of 66 units from the Reserve, 53 units previously approved under DVA2010-08001and amended under DVA2010-08001A and 13 units approved under HDA2014-07004. It is generally understood that a viable overnight accommodation project on the Beach requires additional density and, in turn certain amounts of flexibility with regard to setbacks and height. The requested decrease in the side (west) setback to 5 feet is for the proposed sidewalk, the building actually meets the required setback of 10'. The previously mentioned sidewalk will be screened by lush landscaping meeting the intent of Beach By Design. The proposed setback along the rear of the property (Clearwater Harbor Sea wa11) is 4 feet and the Beach by Design recommendation is 0 setback. The 15' front setback along Devon Drive is consistent with the Tourist District standard requirement. The south property line will also be landscaped to provide screening meeting the intent of the Beach by Design guide lines. The proposed building Setbacks aze consistent with the CDC and the proposed landscaping will meet the design intent of Beach by Design. The proposed height of 100' height is mitigated by building step backs of between 10 and 40 feet and is encouraged in this azea of Beach by Design for buildings which meet the requirements of the Design Guidelines (which this project has been adjudged to have met as explored in detail elsewhere in this report) and which have acquired additional density through mechanisms such as the Reserve. In fact, one of the strategies of Beach by Design is to "optimize project densities" on the Beach. In short, the number of units directly affects the form of the building vis-a-vis height, setbacks and area of floor plate. In order to create a viable hotel the requested level of flexibility is needed. As such, the proposal is a reasonably expected design solution consistent with established and approved uses on adjacent properties. It follows that a reasonable conclusion is that the redevelopment of the site is otherwise impractical without deviations from the development standards as otherwise provided in the T District. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section. 40 Devon Drive I 2015 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goa/s and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district Comprehensive Plan: The proposal is supported by applicable vatious Goa1s, Objectives and/or Policies of the Gity's Comprehensive Plan as follows: Future Land Use Plan Element: Policy A.1.2.1 - The City shall require new or redeveloped overnight accommodations uses located within the Ciry's coastal storm area to have a hurricane evacuation plan, approved by the City, for all guests. This plan shall require the commencement of evacuation of hotel guests as soon as a hurricane watch is posted for the City. A Hurricane Evacuation Plan will be submitted to and approved by the City prior to the issuance of any permits. Therefore, the proposal will support this Policy Policy A.3.2.1 - All new development or redevelopment of property within the City of Clearwater shall meet all landscape requirements of the Community Development Code. The proposal meets the requirements of the CDC by providing landscaping along all sides of the site in excess of CDC requirements and supports this Policy. Goal A.5 - The city of Clearwater shall identify and utilize a citywide Design structure comprised of a hierarchy ofplaces and linkages. The citywide design siructure will serve as a guide to development and land use decisions while protecting those elements that make the city uniquely Clearwater. Objective A.5.1— Establish the Hierarchy of Places as shown on Map A-14. Policy A.5.1.1 - Identify Activaty Centers: high intensity, high-density multi-use areas designated as appropriate for intensive growth and routinely provide service to a significant number of citizens of more than one county. Activity centers are proximate and accessible to interstate or major arterial roadways, and are composed of multiple destination points, landmarks and neighborhood centers and character features. The subject site is located within an Activitv Center identified on Map A-14 in the FLLTE of the City's Comprehensive Plan where the proposal includes a high-intensity, high density development. Therefore, the proposal will support this Goal, Objective and Policy. Objective A.S.S - Promote high quality design standards that support Clearwater's image and contribute to its identity. The proposal includes the redevelopment of a Old Hotel Building. The proposal includes a new attractive Hotel building which meets the requirements of the Design Guidelines of Beach by Design. 2 40 Devon Drive I 201� Policy A.S.5.1 Development should be designed to maintain and support the existing or envisioned character of the neighborhood. As mentioned above, the proposal is consistent with the vision of Beach by Design, and the Design Guidelines and supports this Policy. Objective A.6.1 - The redevelopment of blighted, substandard, inefj`'icient andlor obsolete areas shall be a high priority and promoted through the implementation of redevelopment and special area plans, the consiruction of catalytic private projects, city investment, and continued emphasis on property maintenance standards. In adopting Beach by Design the City recognized that lazge portions of the Beach could be classified as blighted, substandard and sui%red from "obsolescence and age". One of the goals of Beach by Design is to reverse this trend of disinvestment. This goal is well on the way to being met (perhaps even exceeded) in many areas of the Beach. The proposed hotel should be seen as an important component in fulfilling the vision of the Small Motel District by replacing an older outdated hotel building with an attractive new hotel building that meets the current beach by design guide lines, and is one more step in the revitalization of the Beach, supporting this Objective. Policy A.6.1.2 - Renewal of the beach tourist district shall be encouraged through the establishment of distinct districts within Clearwater Beach, the establishment of a limited density pool of additional hotel rooms to be used in specified geographic areas of Clearwater Beach, enhancement of public rights-of-way, the vacation of public rights-of- way when appropriate, transportation improvements, inter-beach and intra-beach transit, transfer of development rights and the use of design guidelines, pursuant to Beach by Design: A Preliminary Design for Clearwater Beach and Design Guidelines. The site was the subject of an allocation of 66 hotel units from the Reserve which allows for a total of 98 hotel units. The redevelopment of this parcel with a hotel will play an important role in the continuing renewal and revitalization of the Beach. Therefore, the proposal supports tlus Policy. Objective A.6.6 - Tourism is a substantial element of the City's economic base and as such the City shall continue to support the maintenance and enhancement of this important economic sector. Policy A.6.6.1 - The City supports and encourages the continued development and redevelopment of overnight accommodation uses. The proposed redevelopment includes an overnight accommodation use which will serve tourists and locals alike contributing to a vibrant successful resort destination and supports this Objective and Policy. Policy A.6.8.3 - Where appropriate, development shall provide a sense of pedestrian scale on streets through minimal front setbacks, similar building heights, street trees and proportionality of building heights to street widths. The proposal includes a significant overnight accommodation use with an overall height of 100 feet +/_. However, this height is mitigated in several ways: l. The bulk of the building is setback a minimum of appro�umately 15 feet from any front property line; 3 40 Devon Drive I 2015 2. Lush landscaping will be provided along all sides of the site; 3. The build-to line along Devon Drive will match existing development to the north; The overall effect of the proposal will pedestrian-scale consistent with the goals and vision of Beach by Design and the Small Motel District and supports this Policy. Community Development Code: The proposal is supported by the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code as follows: Section 1-103.B.1. Allowing property owners to enhance the value of their property through innovative and creative redevelopment. The property owner will redevelop the property with a new attractive building, a vibrant use (overnight accommodations with accessory amenities) and will contribute to the public space with lush landscaping along Devon Dr. The development is considered innovative by the incorporation of units allocated from the Reserve. Therefore, the proposal supports this CDC Section. Section 1-103.B.2. Ensuring that development and redevelopment will not have a negative impact on the value of surrounding properties and wherever practicable promoting development and redevelopment which will enhance the value of surrounding properties. Surrounding properties are generally developed with a myriad of uses indicative of a tourist destination including overnight accommodations, retail sales and services, bars, nightclubs, outdoor recreation and entertainment, restaurants and attached dwellings. The proposed hotel will constitute an appropriate use for the neighborhood. Surrounding properties will be enhanced through the addition of uses which will contribute to an active and vibrant street life. Therefore, the proposal supports this CDC Section. Section 1-103.B.3. Strengthening the city's economy and increasing its tmr base as a whole. The proposal includes the redevelopment of an older hotel building in one of the more valuable areas of the City vis-a-vis tourism with a new 98-unit hotel. In addition, the new hotel is expected to create approximately 75 new jobs and will positively contributing to the City's economy and its taac base. Therefore, the proposal supports this CDC Section. Section 1-103.D. It is the further purpose of this Development Code to make the beautification of the city a matter of the highest priority and to require that existing and .future uses and structures in the ciry are attractive and wedl-maintained to the maximum extent permitted by law. The proposal includes a new attractive building chazacterized by a modern style and crisp, clean lines. In addition, this proposal provides landscaping along all sides of the site. The landscape design incorpora.tes plant material that is native and/or naturalized and salt tolerant, while providing visual interest. Therefore, the proposal supports this CDC Section. $ 40 Devon Drive I 2015 Section 1-103. E. S. Preserve the natural resources and aesthetic character of the community for both the resident and tourist population consistent with the city's economic underpinnings. The proposal will support both the resident and tourist populations with an attractive new hotel. The proposal will be consistent with the desired form and function of the Small Motel District of Beach by Design and meets the Design Guidelines of that document. Therefore, the proposal supports this CDC Section. Section 2-401.1 Intent of the T District and RFH FL UP classification. 'I'he CDC provides that it is the intent of the T District that development be consistent with the Countywide Future Land Use Plan as re�uired by state law. The uses and development potential of a parcel of land within the T District shall be determined by the standards found in this Development Code as well as the Countywide Future Land Use Designation of the property, including any acreage or floor azea restrictions set forth in the Rules Concerning the Administration of the Countywide Future Land Use Plan, as amended from time to time. For those parcels within the T District that have an area within the boundaries of and governed by a special area plan approved by the city council and the countywide planning authority, maximum development potential shall be as set forth for each classification of use and location in the approved plan. Section 2.33.4.6 of the Countywide Land Use Rules provides that the purpose of the RFH FLUP classification is to depict those areas of the County that are now developed, or appropriate to be developed, with high density residential and resort, tourist facility uses, and to recognize such areas as well-suited for the combination of residential and temporary lodging use consistent with their location, surrounding uses, transportation facilities and natural resource characteristics of such areas. The site is proposed to be developed with a hotel which is a use permitted by the RFH FLUP classification. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. The proposed development maintains an existing appropriate land use according to Beach by Design with a limited service hotel that caters to families and established clientele. The project includes adequate off-street parking. The new project will provide a positive example along the Devon Drive to serve as a catalyst for redevelopment of new hotels and mixed use development. This will have a positive impact on the value of the adjacent land and also provide clientele for the surrounding restaurants and retail shops. The proposal should have no impact on the ability of adjacent properties to redevelop or otherwise be improved in accorda.nce with the requirements and limitations of Beach by Design. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section. 5 40 Devon Drive I 2015 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed developmen� The proposed redevelopment project will improve the visual appeal near the north entry to Pier 60 & Small Motel Districts. The architectural style integrates a beach contemporary design which is appropriate and aesthetically pleasing for the Small Motel District. T'he proposal is similar to and will support adjacent uses. The proposed height is similar to the buildings adjacent to the west and compazable to other buildings in the area. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section. 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be per»utted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent tand uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shaU demonstrate compliance with one or more of six objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a»unimum standard, flexible standard orJlexible development use; b. The proposed use wou[d be a significant economic contributor to the city's economic base by divers�ing the local economy or by creating jobs; As mentioned previously, the T District permits overnight accommodations as a flexible standard development use. The proposal will increase the density of the site over what is there now and otherwise permitted by the CDC given the allocation of hotel units from the Reserve. The proposal is expected to create approximately 75 jobs. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified based on demonshated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning distric� As mentioned, surrounding properties are developed with a variety of uses typical of a tourist destination including hotels, retail, restaurants, outdoor recreation and entertainment and attached dwellings. The proposed mixed use will support and complement surrounding uses with regard to form and function. The proposal will have no effect on the ability of surrounding properties to be redeveloped or otherwise improved. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section. b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the city. � 40 Devon Drive I 2015 As discussed in detail in this document, the proposal is fully compliant with all applicable portions of the Design Guidelines of Beach by Design. Therefore, this CDC Section is not applicable to the proposal. c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed deve[opment su,pports the established or emerging character of an arec� The proposal provides for a use similar in scale and scope as other developments both built and approved in the area and, as discussed in detail, is supported by the vision of the Sma11 Motel District of Beach by Design. The proposed hotel is desired on the Beach and will support surrounding uses such as retail, restaurants and outdoor recreation and entertai.nment. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section. d. In order to J'orm a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: ■ Changes in horizontal building planes; ■ Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etG; ■ Yariety in materials, colors and teztures; ■ Distinctive fenestration patterns; ■ Building step backs; and ■ Distinctive roofs forms. The architecture of the buildings provides for substantial articulation of the fenestration through the use balconies, railings, windows and building offset. The buildings and site design have been explored in detail as part of the discussion addressed compliance with the Design Guidelines of Beach by Design. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. The proposal provides distances of between 30 and 40 feet from adjacent streets. The building also includes step backs of between 10 and 40 feet. Lush landscaping that exceeds the intent of the CDC is provided along a11 sides of the site. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section. i Project Narrative for the Sea Captain Hotel � 2015 Sea Captain Hotel Building Pro�ect Request The property is located within the Tourist "T" Zoning District. The site's 0.831 acres has a FLUP designation of (RFH 0.659 ac.) &(RU 0.172 ac.) which allows for 50 ovemight accommodation units per acre for the area within the ("T" Zoning District 0.659 ac.). The 0.659 acres would permit a maximum of 32 units. The project has received approval from the city council (DVA2010-08001) and amended (DVA2010-08001A) for 53 units and 13 additional units approved under (HDA2014-07004) from the hotel Density Reserve. The project is approved for a total of 98 units, resulting in overall density for the site of 148.7 DU/acre. The Beach by Design guidelines allows for a maximum of 150 units per acre for projects that obtain units from the hotel density reserve; therefore, the proposed density is consistent with the development criteria set forth in Section V.B.2 of the guidelines and is APPOVED BY CITY COUNCIL. The proposal provides for a building 100' in height as measured from BFE where a height of up to 100 feet is permitted where additional density is allocated to a development via the Hotel Density Reserve. The subject property is located on the north side of Devon Drive and the property was the recipient of density from the Reserve. Therefore, the proposed height complies with the design guidelines, (a request to increase the building height to 100' above base flood elevation 13' is being proposed) . The proposed 15 foot setback on Devon Drive, for an enclosed parking garage and ground floor building area is within the required setback distance for standard development within the Tourist District. 10 foot building setbacks are proposed for the side yard along the west prope�ty line, (meeting the standard development criteria within the Tourist District). The design proposes a 5 foot setback #o the west property line for a sidewalk. The proposed building setback along the rear property line is proposed to be 4' (Clearwater Harbor sea wall). The previously mentioned sidewalk is by definition a structure, as such we a�e requesting setback reductions as allowed for in the "Beach by Design" overlay district criteria. Beach by design has recommended 0' setback for side and rear property lines. A request for a finro year development order is also being proposed. Locatian and Existing Condiiions The property is located in the Beach By Design (Small Motel District), and also within the Tourist (T) zone district. The Future Land Use Designation is Resort Facilities High. The current use is a hotel building with residential units. The site area within the tourist district is �8,688 +/- square feet or 0.659 +/- acres. The property currentty has 36 parking spaces. The project is not located within the CCCI. The property to the west is the Pier House 60 Hotel . The property to the north is the Clearwater Harbor. The property to the east is the Clearwater Harbor The property to the Project Narrative for the Sea Captain Hotel � 201� south includes Devon Drive right of way and a City of Ciearwater parking lot. The property to the south east includes a residential unit. Development Froposal The proposed development maintains an existing appropriate land use according to Beach by Design with a limited service hotel that caters to families and established clientele. The project includes adequate offi street parking. The new project will provide a positive example along the Devon Drive to serve as a catalyst for redevefopment of new hotels and mixed use development. This will have a positive impact on the value of the adjacent land and also provide clientele for the surrounding restaurants and retail shops. The shape of the project site is close to a square, the first three floors of the building, the garage, maintains similar width and length dimensions; however the height of the base is significantly less than either of the two other dimensions. Above the garage base the tower portion maintains about a finro to one width to length dimension. The design proposes decoratively screened and articulated garage openings on the first two levels. The 2nd level proposes undecorated garage openings, however, the openings will still be modulated to coordinate with the general rhythm and pattern of the other building (Pier House 60) fa�ade openings and windows. The openings in the parking area at the 3rd floor level is pulled back minimally 15 feet from the face of the building, effectively hiding the openings from pedestrian and higher levels. The buildings step back 15 feet or more from the street front facades, so the streetscapes are effectively 100% transparent. The design proposes a highly articulated building farade that differentiates the residential tower from the more average garage portion. At the garage entry we are proposing a two story decorative and articulated entrance. These fa�ade articulations will serve to identify the available hotel activity areas and entrances. Sidewalks, along the building frontage, shall align with the existing adjacent sidewalks and shall match the width of the existing adjacent sidewalks. Landscaping shall be designed per code and shall be submitted for approval with this application. Street Benches and trash receptacles area proposed along Devon Drive and shall be designed per code and submitted for approval at building permit. Bicycle racks will be provided within the ground floor garage. The building colors are planned as a lighter and darker beige, sand and white, to coordinate with its sister building, Pier 60, next door. All colors proposed are to follow the BbD color palate. Project Narrative for the Sea Captain Hotel 12015 The proposed project wiil have 118 garage parking stails based on the Tourist standard requirement of 1.2 spaces per development unit. Conciusion The beauty of Clearwater beach makes it a popular destination for visitors and residents. The City has created a master plan to guide the redevelopment process, preserving the beauty of the natural resources while creating districts that enhance the experience of visitors. The proposed hotel is designed to incorporate the Beach by Design vision with a pedestrian friendly destination, landscaped areas, scenic views and visual variety. The proposed hotel meets zoning, and Beach by Design standards. Electronic Articles of Organization For Florida Limited Liability Company Article I The name of the Limited Liability Company is: DECADE SEA CAPTAIN LLC L14000094894 FILED 8:00 AM June12 2014 Sec. Of �tate syoung Article II The street address of the principal office of the Limited Liability Company is: 40 DEVON DRIVE CLEARWATER, FL. US 337672436 The mailing address of the Limited Liability Company is: 13555 BISHOPS COURT, SLJITE 345 BROOKFIELD, WI. US 530056218 Article III Other provisions, if any: THE COMPANY SHALL BE MANAGER-MANAGED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE OPERATING AGREEMENT ADOPTED BY THE MEMBERS FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF THE BUSINESS AND AFFAIRS OF THE C4MPANY. Article IV The name and Florida street address of the registered agent is: C T COR.PORATION SYSTEM 1200 SOUTH PINE ISLAND ROAD PLANTATION, FL. 33324 Having been named as reg�'stered agent and to accept service of process for ihe above �ta.ted limited liability company at the place designated in this certificate, I hereby accept the appointinent as registered agent and a�e to act m tius capacrty. I further agree to comply wrth the provisions of all statutes relating to the proper and complete performance of my duties, and I am familiar with and accept tfi�e obligahons of my position as registered agent. Registered Agent Signature: REBECCA BARTH Article V The name and address of person(s) authorized to manage LLC: Title: MGR JEFFREY KEIERLEBER 240 BAYSIDE DRIVE CLEARWATER, FL. 337672903 US Signature of inember or an authorized representative Electronic Signature: MICHAEL G. SWEET L14000Q94894 FILED 8:00 AM June12 2014 Sec. Of �tate syoung I am the member or authorized representative submitring these Articles of Organization and affirm that the facts stated herein are true. I am aware that false information submitted in a document to t.�e Department of State constitutes a third degree felony as provided for in s.817.155, F.S. I understand the requ�rement to file an aYmual report between January 1 st and May 1 st in the calendar yeaz foilowing formation of the LLC and every year ti�ereafter to maintain "achve" status. �. — — — — — —ir�,, �� fANDSCAPE AREA 10 -0„ SETBACK ❑ � �-� � OPEN DARKING BELOVV EXISTING SEAWALL LANDSCAPE AREA ❑ ACTIVITV DECK BELOIM1' ❑ MAIN ROOF \ EXISTING BOAT DOCKS \ > P/L / / \ / � Slh'IMMING POOL R� DECK �Q I / a� =f � - / /� Y BVILDING ENTRY/ d EXIi � ` � � � _.,� �.: _ � �:.. � Y �,?.; ✓ : �.. / �. ✓ '�,..' �I ��.� �=. � ., �a.; �..' � !� � �=.�` \ i �y+.-.x' �..' � / � o v � � ' �.O �.i / . � m �/I �w �: � �� ' / � �..- � , ' ...'�p � �Y i , � � : P/L jq �s� -, ' �r: � 1 �. � � . 'Q+.Y .�� r 3� r ��q' �.f�q, �. ` � . �.Y IANDSCAPE AREA . . �� � "�" ' $" .� �.v 6�S . � �,.Y � � �".� �. �.1 � •, �•ya.. �':.. �.a' �{L PVBLICSIDEWALK 1 ST STREET "I ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN � � scn�e�. sux°= i�' PROJECT NORTH Ij1� \ _\ � I CLEARWATER HARBOR ` \ \ ZONf'9 2 �. � \ . ����� � �� \ \ \ \ � . ��'Y"-.s'�`�'� // ���r' \ EXISTINGSEAWALL � R' �.t' I � �.� ;; �.:; �.��P�"�- �.., �= � � �. , �LO/vF � %� ,�.,t5�:�;. y�...' �..' L�NE���� _'�.�C=.t:�.t' �..' . . Afl \ �.`' ♦ LANDS EAREA S5� .� � � � �.,' •.�.� �'4x � ,¢ �,. , � ,"raa.% �,.1 \ � \ �r� � � .� �.;: � '` �� .:,. �':�; .:-. � � � ; ; ��r °�: � � -. \ � � \ � � LMDR \ I � � _ . P/L . . . . . . . . . . . . — � \ rOVERALL PARKING COUNT LEVEL � STANDARD HANDICAP i�—. ____ . 1 .___ __ - LEVEL 1 � 26 2 — f _ _ _ ___ �!, LEVEL 2 ��, 32 1 LEVEL 3 33 '�.. 1 � .__—__ _ _...___F__ . .__ i LEVEL 4 '�� ZZ I � '� TOTAI �'�. 113 5 N V \� � � � � � v �� a� v � � AAZF�n„�.: GLE.IPWATER 1�3 Rogers Straei. 33]So _ ,_?y�830'3'�.f ]27�1�830'4 :s tlr�,v�,ng �is the p�opPr[y� �t � ntl ms��:�o . �.otl�,:ce� . n2perrm�.ss�.on ir�i�r.. �ffhar���. p9';e a.�.,;r. in.. ISNAN L. PETER4NECZ AR94533 FLORIDA PROJECT TITIE: Z Q � � w � � � f.l� V ow Q � ZQ w ~ o� O � w (� _ � � ISSUED DRAWING LOG: PROJECTNO: SEA14.01 DRAWINGTITLE: � SITE PLAN ISSUE DATE: 2015.03.13 A1 0 PRELIMINARY DESIGN e � N U Q� � �� �� 4� �� �� .� Q.. CLEARWAiEfl 103 Rogers S�reel. 33756 t 92�5�g30�3'.i �z7V"/83a�z Tn:s tl�a�H+ng ,s tna prope�ty oi oensr, a r,ay nm -=..,s=,i ar ,er^000a.=� w�tno�t=Hr.re,^ . ..� � 'osna. . ue��.a.,�_i-..n,. ISNAN L. PETER4NECZ AR84533 FLORIDA PROJECT TITLE: Z Q � � Q U Q w W � (� _ ♦ ♦ ♦ >� �� �w � o� ow J °�U PROJECTNO: SEA14.01 DRAWING TITLE: GROUND LEVEL 2015.03.13 SHEET: A2 1 PRELIMINARY DESIGN ����� ,: � , � � � �.`vA?',`Hhl':.P? ISNAN L. PETERANECZ AR94533 FLORIDA Z Q � � Q U � J H w Q � 2 >� �� o� O� ow � �U ISSUED DRAWING LOG: Qwre rnec PR0.)EC7 NO: SEA14.01 DRAWING TRLE: LEVEL 2 2015.03.13 SHEET: � � PRELIMINARY DESIGN \ � \ — I _\ � N V 4.� � s.� � �� 4.� �� 4� 4� �� CIEARWATEP ±Q3 Aoga�s S��eei. 33�5& t]2i s>830]9 i i. i2� a�8 �C�a ISNAN L. PETI AR945: FLORIC � PROJECT TITLE�. Z Q � � Q U � J � W 0 � 2 :R4NECZ 3 A >� �� ow � O� ow � °�U po. � � 0 � � 0 � 0 � 0 0 PROJECTNO: SEA14.01 DRAWING 71TLE: LEVEL 5 ISSUEDATE: 2015.03.13 A2 5 PRELIMINARY DESIGN \ \. . -- _ � N U 4� � �� CC� � 4.� .-� � 4� 4� � � CCEAPWAiEF 103 Rogais Stre�t,33�56 t]2] 4'8 a013: t. �2] 4l0 30?A ISNAN L. PETERANECZ AR94533 FLORIDA PROJECT TITLE: Z Q �- � Q U Q w Wp C� _ >� �� oW � o� oW J °�r U ISSUEO DRAWING LOG: �o^ � � � � � 0 � � � P�ROJECT NO: SEA14.01 DR4WING TITLE: LEVELS 6-9 2015.03.13 I SHEET: A2 6 PRELIMINARY DESIGN ,rTOP OF MECHANICAL EL.=+�25'-0" , fTOP OF PARAPET ` EL.= +116'-8" rTOP OF ROOF ,�, EL.= +113. 0.. O fLEVEL9 ^ EL.=+99'0" f rLEVEL 8 EL = �86'-4" fLEVEL 7 ^ EL.=+73'-9" � x IEVEL6 i � lEl.=+61'-0" � r�j O LEVEL 5 'r'EL=+47'-0" -. -. � LEVEL 4 fEL.=+]b'-0"� � - �,LEVEL3 � EL.= «25 -0" LEVEL 2 �EL.=+75'-0" BASEFLOOD f13'-0"NAVD � (VE 13) GROUNDFLOOR � rEL =+4. p^ fTOP OF MECHANICAL EL.=�t125'-0" TOP OF PARAPET EL.=�116'-6" � f,TOP OF ROOF EL i113'-0" rLEVEL 9 EL.= +gg'-0" f,LEVELB e� ,es a. f LEVEL 7 EL - t73._8" fLEVEL6 z EL = +6t'-0 LEVE} 5 jEL 47 0" fIEVEL d EL. � � 35'-0" fLEVEL 3 EL.- +z5'-0" fLEVEL 2 EL=+15'-0" BASEFLOOD f 13 0" NAVD � � (VE 13) J GROUNDFLOOR � �EL = +4'-0" EXTERIOR DECK ANO GAZEBO DECORATIVE METAL - � _� SCREENING �" ��;��'.� . '. _ _. � I '� � 111��� � 1 --- �� DECORATIVECORNICE 3�� - ��—� - BEVOND T �.��- _._-�_— f �— � _ .. : - :.__... _;_ ._ � MAX. 42" PARAPET ' . _�� � STUCCO VENEER � ? '('�' �,�- "r ;� �� $##��,'�'�I �,_ � � - � � PAINTED METAL � � � '�:: u T�� P��;;��� � . RAILINGS �' z � �� _ � � �7Y F4y� #� `� � t�. _' 1� FF j��1-'Y��'!!� �'' ..r � .-' ' .:� i�'{r �. � _'� �� �r t��'� m.�, � � q=4�.,,-� 1i �r--. _.. �L��c . _.+ k-� � t��� _ . � AIUMINUMSTOREFRONT � � �,a.4.., � y� ._ WINDOWSANDENTRANCES � kd�� F � � � " �tN �� ;���. � � � E%TERIORDECK `� �,y-#�� t � � � DECORATNEMETAL � -- - � - � -- � � SCREENING _ '.. ? .. _ _.. _ _ "' _ _ _. 't � -- � f`�f� (� lII lll;l �p� � f . } _ ,, .� , ' i . ��I'�� �� ' ' :I il��l� �l►.:f�f� �►�I' ' _� � �, . (f, Ij�, ��: I,� �I�� � ��=' ' -. '--' � ' �"' '" � - GARAGE ENTRANCE . � � � �� _ i� �� � NORTH ELEVATION - DEVON DRIVE SCnLE tit6'=t'-0- �- - ,, , �f � +, rr � +"�- �i .. -DECORATNECORNICE � 9 r' �� z � � .�- � �- STAIR AND ELEVATOR . __ . � _ _. . � OVER-RUNS _ $-__ ..� -' -- ' MN( 4 "PAR P x � ' -SI- .'�`. — '� - - ' - - .. ' . � .- STUCCO VENEERT {' - . - '�"w+�' ° - � � � �� Y � � �.�I , ��e � ����I I • � � ' � - PAINTED METAL r� �'��.. }�"�� • ••, � �� . . � RAILINGS �* - .� . < _ _ tl a .� ��--� � {� j �� �'�� � •� _.-�AIUMINUMSTOREFRONT � M � F ',, 4�� y; �� � � � WINDOWS AND ENTRANCES #� � ���a�, � � ��� f ' - � �' Y '� t ' '° � t � � '�� � �I � � � '� � ; t ' - EXTERIOR DECK �� AND GAZEBO ,�� � /�t r�� ._��,j...i ,.--,� T ��� � � r � � I ai9 �.r��?' { � �' '� _ _F _ : c :s-'�� ' { � t � I � -.1 ' � � �t q �.�., � � i � "�� '� � � � . f �,� � , *„ j � , ; ,�- + �?.. �� � �_ _ � _;� ..�... � �� � _ � _ , �*i`-.� '11� • m ;+p} �� Y'��:i �+ �� �..:-' � . I. „� + a � y � � 4 , �; � -'-^*' •- �-� / � � - STUCCO VENEER i ! , �. . f ��- � .� T � 7 � ° - � s+...- E � � Q , * } i * I� � �N'Z � �. f I �� � I� 3�A r � ��� 'j I ��.11 ry ��� ,���{(' . AINTEDMETAL _ - p� . . ._ . � �„ _ � .t / h ! . . #--' �,+k� � i � �I -�- { ._ RAILINGS � _ 5 ."Fj y va y�,� � � � ... : .._ . ' r . a� �}'r'��. +�s � _ *` _ � ` ;� ,� �, � � ) rt� � "-'�; 1 +c� � f �. � i � � � x , .yM � T � �I C� j t �r � ,� '� �r \ .�. .� r � a.: � 1 �' i � �r � _ -�.-� =� � �°;�.� � , � �' � � ,� : ."'..$�- _— =-'ec� i _ �--{-..�. . . k ,.�. . :,. � i t '�� -; � a �'�. ; .. < ' � � i "s. � �.,1 � � ���.� i i � 14-.. ��+� � � •�t. EXISTING T�`i"" N�..,.. . � _ . .. t a�.,,, . -.. � . ; : . .. . 1 �: f �' r � 1`.. . SEAWALL t � ; :. - . . _ r�-' , .. �..... � . . � , � � � ' i i�' , �.'�> >� "' � • � T � �• ' i� { : I � � � i.. .e;;:�. .. '1t_�G�d¢,.-..���"� � t��� ' 1 � � �` . �:�.:. .. � � � . , , a — _ _ . . - —_ _ --__.. _ __ _ 1- ___ --- Z SOUTH ELEVATION SCr1LE�.1/16 =1-0 EXTERIOR COLORS I _ ---- I SW 6385 DOVER NMITE N V � � � � � � � � � � � � � dd25GIlllaa CLEARWATER . 3 R � �s 5 _.. 33, � �i83013'�I 2 �BJO� y � ao ��y., seao�.ep.odu�ao .� n t. n o o� r,om . - a� + oe-e�a� . �� 1 �� �+r�l F'aiu�^���Iw�l i�� lii�9`i'�ui' a°y�%;+�s�;ty:"`rl��'i ��,. I I ISNAN L. PETERANECZ AR94533 '�, FLORIDA I - , PROJECT TITLE: Z Q � � � UJ il � W 111 r 1..1..1 O I v / y ISS�UED DR4WiNM L ` - - / � ' � � ow. � O � I � W J �U PROJECTNO: SEA14.01 DRAWING TITLE�. EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS ISSUE DATE�. 2015.03.13 SHEET: A5 1 PRELIMINARY DESIGN 1,TOP OF MECHANICAL EL = +125'-0" TOP OF PARAPET EL-i118'-8" " TOP_OFROOF f EL=+113'-0" ?LEVEL9_ . . EL.=+98. 0" LEVEL 8 rE�=.86_,. � LEVEL 7 �EL=+73'8" .... x Q. LEVEL 6 � 'rEL-t6t`-0" - ^ LEVEL 5 'rEL=+47'0" � LEVEL4 � lEL.=+35'-0" - fLEVEL3___ � EL.=i25'-0" �- LEVEL2_ _ f EL= +15'-0" BASEFLOO� ?13'-0"NAVD � �� (VE 13) GROUNDFLOOR � rE� .a-o•� - TOP OF MECHANICAL fEL=+125'-0" - TOP OF PARAPET EL 118-8" � TOP OF ROOF rEL 113'-0" - LEVEL9 ^ 1'E�-tgg.p" - LEVELB fEL.=+86.4" � LEVE+ 7 ^ `rEL- 73 8 x LEVEL6 z ` rEL.=+61'-0" �LEVEL 5 EL- i47 0" � LEVEL4___ � 1EL. 35'-0" � LEVEL3 0 fEL. +25 0' �- � fLEVEL 2 EL.- i15'-0" BASEFLOOD f 13 0" NAVD � (VE 13) GROUNDFLOOR fEL.= «4�_Q,� � �� � STAIR AND ELEVATOR ---�� � OVER-RUNS MAX.42"PARAPET '�� STUCCOVENEER �-��� -- . #-�.—� PAINTED METAL L _ RAILINGS ��� � rt + ALUMINUM STOREFRONT ` F, WINDOWS AND ENTRANCES e{ EXTERIOR �ECK -��� ,�„.� ANDGAZEBO �_) � e"9*5 �.. _.: ..:.. � "....._ -� -. � � � �a � � � � ,.' � . i --k' ��_ _ ' _ � � T � ; r ! II��'� �'� � ,�� � t ,' r_� � -s '_ � !"_ i z-. 1 _ ' `�� ' �„� �'�,` �' } %' a +' f` � _ � ' � .._ 't'�ti �� �' � ' ., _ � ` � ( �t� ;.-;�-,.��:...,- -�..� �-�.� �-� � -,.�--� - f I�g-- rz .+r - - r $-.- ,a�.... __._:t .....�_—. _ _ae- tv _ � -�-� � � �''` # t � r .t '. :t �# �' _ _ �� 4 — � *� .I._ �� ���� ���� �. 'It`� �� 1� r �.• - r_ _ _ ,. _ _ ^ . . _ y �. k. - ..�. . . r: r .___ ' � �- i' � ia: � ' � Cf i i :.-� � • - - ...,+,�+.At -m,���� � �—.- _ ... 1' - � � + ...._. � .. ... _--.,, • < .. . -=�" � � . � � _ n �-: i I ,- t� - �d . t���� . � al �� M M_• {t i+�����#� 11� �, � . r t " �, 1_s--t � i , b_ � -� ; - � � r � . .. � ��.�! : _ � __ =_���! r" , : _* � ,-, �. _ ��� ; � ' � �« i _ ` �. �_�. \ � ( � ., + � �* , ,, .. i zrt . . �.��. ��.+`- - �ti . �" , . t :, . ,y.� - ,,. , , � � . ' � • �� . � ..� w<� . . ; . t � _ .. .. � , s y � . � # ""' � . . ,, � . : _.. ` �! �' ; � T�N .a�.: f� . ��:� � .:� -- - i EAST ELEVATION SCA�E� t/�6" = t' 0.. . . _... - DECORATIVE CORNICE BEVOND _,� STAIRANDELEVATOR OVER-RUNS � MAX. 42" PARAPET STUCCO VENEER PAINTED META� �i RAILINGS - - A W MINUM STOREFRONT . WINDOWS AND ENTRANCES .---STUCCO VENEER �Y -� PAINTED METAL RAILINGS +' � / i- '� i � �� e ' � ' r�.� ��y. � DECORATNE CORNICE _,i .�, BEYOND �- �� � _ . ____"� _ _ - - �., : ; �-.�----�' STAIR AND ELEVATOR I � � OVER-RUNS --, , ' . � MAX. 42" PARAPET .. .- . . _ �� _ _. ! STUCCO VENEER _- _ y- �� `�< -...... _ _:. _ ..... � .... .�_ -- :,.,,. ._ _ ... � r_ — y y .�.. � � � �p� r I � ��:b �i���P �� S � r '�- _ r � PAINTED METAL �-- �� ' RAILINGS � �v1F �.... � �e�� � ���'�N' � � 'F �AOT _ . �qq�e.� "' � *; � ,..,^ � .. wr -�w - _ .. _... __ ALUMINUM STOREFRONT � _� - �-,' � � � ::� � .: �' �� $$ � -# WINDOWS AND ENTRANCES " � � +' y _ �1 �y �..^! t ^ .-�". 7« ,� � � . -. „- � � .it :� r���i -�'+,.='7 vr � v^ � ,; � �, ._- .._ . � ' - r� ' - � EXTERIORDECK -�- , � � p � �''` �� ANDGAZEBO { j � � � � d � E f ! � ! � . j �� �; ., � �p-+. z... _... ,._s�- ,F— �.. ......_�+ .:_ �';.�_ - �' -��, ^_-� ��- n w� ... .q_ '�- ..�-_.- . . ,r � 4 � s s : t � k ! 4 � � ( �` �s-� i �rl �� �� i s w— r ;, -� ' ' ' ` ��� �.LL_. „ �, _..W,e.�..r..._,.....�..x.a_':-« �v� . � $..-�_ .. � ..t,d1.:3 � � K° y � �; fi� , 4G-t �� ,i�-�l . `� � � w �= ,� �� . �. � �, � , � �. � ��� � � ��� � �� � i ��� �,� � � _ � ��� � f�` ___- , x � � � (� r-u, • ' ' � q- � ' , �,--x 3 . � � '-� ' � `� , * ' `'1 - � ` � z t _ _ i `» �T��, .. , «.p i �, , � � . ' -4#� �.__�� '��� . _. ..-': t- .. � r ;� ���ll�� 1ql�illl7f� �fl18�-1(�1II�11(C . �, Iillll� �Ill�lll� � . ��I� �If� ;� ' ^i i � ._ .._. .. '" " " - l� ���,,�� � �� � � � � __ ��- � I ' �II�� �� ' �Illill���l���ll� � � I +- -f -t+-- -# �F----+�F----t 1- --f 1-- r.f.... —; �� �-�,.��'-°'-FY . . � �� �. . ! . : � � . .._. . , i 1 ' � . . i . . . � , . , 2 WEST ELEVATION SCALE 1/i6'.= 1' a.' STAIR AN� E�EVATOR OVER-RUNS MAX.42"PARAPET STUCCO VENEER PAINTED METAL RAIIINGS EXIS7ING SEAWALL ALUMINUM STOREFRONT WINDOWS AND ENTRANCES DECORATIVE METAL SCREENING �: � _ EXTERIOR COLORS SW 6385 DOVER WHITE N V v � �� � � � I � � III � � � � CIEARWATEP '� 1�3 Fogers Siree�. 33'>"v 1]2� S'8 30�� I. ]2l Y18 30'S r a y� m p ii , p n o :d � . . � ISNAN L. PETERANECZ AR94533 FLORIDA Z Q � � Q UJ � L Wr v / O >� �� Q w � � � LL ow J °vU ISSUED DRAWING LOG: PROJECTNO: SEA14.01 DRAWING TITLE: EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS ISSUE DATE'. 2015.03.13 SHEET: A5 2 , _ PRELIMINARY DESIGN - - - � - ----- - --- - _ _- . ! � ___ < �. I � �A �ff. -�— .� �� ..___ .. � T ' .t 1 " —a � 1 r � � -. ,�� _ " _ . . . _ r. °- �, _ !�{ • \ ` � �" S 1" y �d M � �3 P`, ,- � ��� , ' � -� ,� a � 3 �i ,� � _ - � � � �?' � y':r �--� �� � � �'� 1 � _ �. . � ,� � _k. � ��'";` � �' i ; 'rt ``�. � �� � ,,' � ; r ` � r � � � +--F ; . + j�, �` � t� � � -.i ; '� ,- - � t-� � —� '��''`�`_ k�i, �, � � s�,. r�- y g �� _ a � � -f` - � ��' � -t � k��, � t �� , _^�`.�� � . ��.,.�- � � � � f y -t "�,. {�,� ��, � ,, � �A � . ': � �-�'a � � G � i, � ��� e J t ��_ r� � , � ,, � � -7 , Y ��,4 �- � , � �� } � � y..:�111;�1 ! .� �' , i . + ��� -,x �.�� � e' � �. „� � � �'..���'„�4�1 1�10��4- t •�,,..�? � � . s. �' ,1. � i,it' �w � �+ < �` �=� � �" � � ,,, �� ��'i� � .• X� �M � 5�.+��I ��y` �� p-� � 'q � �� _l�+.. ����y. � � � � ��q i„� � �� � .I�", t .. b: �. �'&r,� � i •� � � � '.:, , n � �,.� � :� • . �r , , , d �' iit ��. � p . " ` '1 ,: � � � � �,'.+`.- � , � t �� . � . ` � � " ,,,; ` \ r � . :�' � � M� � _y ,�.,a � SOUTH WEST AERIAL : ,� � �'C� _.. ?�y,�:. " i — � �- ,�, . - -•-.-� ; _ "� '�_ � � _ �� -`� ! � I �� _. � � '';.';:4 � _< ��.` � �� - \ =��' ., , -� � ,�� A�'�; �;�`� � � __=_�, ; � � �ti . `�"'�, ' °� `�1� \ � �i „ � h \ H � � � � � � �� {-3� �� ' % ? � �, �� � � �' � j ��•� � � r' �5� �" TI�t �.�t�-� � � ���.�� ' j1 -�� h, �' � � .w f', . ���� ' V�-i- ` �" r � � � , „...! - ,�, , �X ,�y � .�,���w�� sy'Sk` f'� ��'ri i F 1 \ �l" f/,�� ,�� y,..> � ,..;.. ��„� _ <Y, ;. � ,� � `}v�'h' r -. -,'. ,"'�8 r , ���. ; �; �'�` � ' I ` ri a, . , � , •. ��'Y. 1 'p s'- ��- "�iff # � � �."` v '• . � '� � � # ;>` '",� '�,+ry,��� � f� � �� � K�i ' , �'ll r < � .�\ ,( � .. v�.�+. . � �.t�#..+��.���da i t ' �,y d-� . �.� : t r ~~ � .Y . ' � � j .� !�� � � � �, I _ � � � � '`�'" ` it `� : 2 � � , `� � ��:� � "� P ' � 1 r�t �y, , , ,• -�r ; i�,]j�ib ii' I j� , : .._i , . �, N �✓'.w �.i� � Y �'�. ��� � <� + i a :t i�"' � � � ;\� , `, r ��"'�� ` �' .:.,'.s � � ;:. +p'r��� � r v""-- °.. � � y"� � r� �,,a�i �` � � � � � � ^-":.� ��� :��y J� . ' y„:� �;`. ' ' � i '�fi r J^' � Y ,s "?� ��*j'� � � ' � . ;� � _ --_ ���=�" y�,�,' , �..�, � ,��_ � , F � � � '►' fr t # � � � r '�� �- � ��{ � � �. � ��, # � t , .:a� :, .. � ,, � , n . � " j� . f �.�� � . �� �;.. � _ � ,:...-�-.` ` _ _ r __ _ _ r; ,„ ----''"" � "' �� ��, ��' �. .._ � � � ' . . . NORTH EAST AERIAL � �` � !'. /; � ,-�m 7 N V � � � � � �w � � � �1./ �/ � � �a ,,»3 CtEARWATEA . � 3 R g 5 , 3 3� t 2 383.3'�t 2 18]0� -� y � P � � � m y � a o d � eenar+pe�e�an�ecz ncn'ro.m ISNAN L. PE7ERANEC AR94533 FLORIDA II r— PROJECT TITLE�. i f� I � i � � I \ V � Q w , W O v / � � ISSUED DRAWING L I _ _ ,.- \ — ; � i � � I ow� � o� wQ� ow O J , vU I PROJECT NO: SEA14.01 DRAWING TITLE�. PERSPECTIVES ISSUE DATE: 2015.03.13 SHEET: A5 3 PRELIMINARY DESIGN ��� r I T --__---_ — ,- � _ _�i � � "i � � T �'���� 'A � I� f T k� en � ...«. �. _ _- -. � '__ ..� � .��. A� '=' � _,j. .... .. � x ._. , � �r „� �� � -=r awr� 'am� ��_ � �4 � ��� � � ''� � �t _�: �''� ;� r�l �:�,' t_ � �s�. ' .*.+ .,,r iT� .. � +.��` i ;,�} . d=�"�'�� =�r �1 ��� r ,t � �� � » #"- ''-�fies'^!"�v's �-.-. f � ' � � s - G �� �; �; - �� Y�� � ; _� ,�� �� �� ��� ��: : �Ilt � I pil ,�"i� 1 ��� ���� _ � . � � __� v. � . _:4.. .. . � c"��a � - �,�,. _,:-. SOUTH WEST ISOMETR�C s °� � �w s�',�_- ��,`/``'_'-- �� � ¢ _ fi„�� �� fi �' w��--7 > 7-1-L� �� �, �� r �-' ��--�'-� � � i_ �a- ,.z � � r,��� �� ,:[ � . ��� � ..� t� � � � �' r ::� '�R� ��,��' � ° _. } _, �j � . - t : '. - _ ' ..�t ���''��•-4 r-"'*�'6 _ � � -� . 'I. , � _. r , i'" �t,.�s7rs � ,. , � ��„�i . _� �� � .4 _ :'� • T * �'_* -( �'�r s.,� , . * -'i� - __ . --. � _ � ���-'� NORTH EAST ISOMETRIC °_e _,y __ _ _�- ____;_ ?-> 4 $ '- � :f � _� �,y --�,� � ' �z � r ' r..... � _ . �� � � °��"'' i � �r �°= �. _ : . � � ��:,�, ' � � i � � � � : { '3°N�i4 ^T.i y� ?.� __,r. . _ _. , _ . �-, � � „ .� -; � {. ��. . .�� � -{ � � � "•F� [� r ._;F �� {"" � .' _�� Y � � ��' j_ r f .=j h, • n: � . �- � - � �i_ 3' t- . � � ^ -,�' � F � � � . . 1.� _�d« ; „- ' ,,;� . +_..— • '�^,�'__ ' . _ �+:�..:-� - z . . i+t M�ii, i^I.. � � _ '� �I;IIf�� - - � -, - .�h �1�� �I�( �- t _-� �, � � , , , , . ._.y � .- / �� j , : . y, . .� _.., - � r ��m � �4�!{ ��1 ��1@� , � � �lol ` ' _ . _. p �4 �" � � �- _— � L �_ ��,'r � ", ✓ � ^ .- �� � .. y � T . k � �� �. SOUTH EAST ISOMETRIC � s. t.,� - _ �" L s � � --_. f< ' " ' .' ' ....._ �i. t Y�::�� ._ .. .., _ ,: � ���-'F �.�"-� :—i=�t%-Z � „ h^ ���;, "!� :! ������a��� � \ ,� i �. �, � ' / �l. � _ � . �� '�-�_— � ��_ -• NORTH WEST ISOMETRIC N U 4� � �� Cd � 4� �� 4� 4� ..� �. CLEARWATEfl 03 Ro�a�s St� . �. 33�Sd t �2? 3?8 30]3 f]2? n]8 JO'd Tn tl g tM1 p p ti . �en � a mar ��. .. a v e e - . c p . . o� nom oe� � , oe.P�a�e�z. ��� ISNAN L. PETERANECZ AR94533 FLORIDA PROJECT TITLE: Z Q � � Q UJ Q� w � VJ = w J , � � I � � ow. �-. . ��i w � �J ,: J °�r U i oUED ORAWMM LOG� PROJECTNO: SEA14.01 DRAWING TITLE: ISOMETRICS I ��� ISSUE DATE: ' 2015.03.13 SHEET A5 4 � - PRELIMINARY DESIGN � l � �S �_ 45� S� , �£ �_. Q 7,_ �. �1SW MASSING MODEL 12 �' � NTS �' .. ___ z NE MASSING MODEL NTS � �� Z I I i il il N U 4� � �� CZ3 �'' � �� 4� 4� � � e��zaoo,�oa CIEAHWATEp 103 Roye�s Sireet. 33?56 i'12� 4]0 3073 � I �2] M1"!8 30 r4 Th's tlrawkr,g �s tRa oroperty o� .. � pet=tanacz.i and mafanot pe ����c or .ae� aC���ceJ �tha� . xRCen pe , ._ . . _� .. _,,,.a, � oa e.a�.__z .o_ ISNAN L. PETERANECZ AR94533 FLORIDA PROJECT TITLE�. Z Q F-- � �� Q �� V ow � Q � °� w o ow C� _ ° � ISSUED DRAWING LOG: Qoa � 0 g 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PROJECT NO: SEA14.01 ORAWING TITLE: MASSING MODEL ISSUE DATE: 2015.03.13 SHEET: A5 5 PRELIMINARY DESIGN TOP OF MECHANICAL lEl = +125'-0' � ,l,TOP OF PARAPET_ ^ EL.=+116'b" TOP OF ROOF �E�,_p, ,r. 0 LEVEL 9 � iE�_�99'-0' .___ ri �LEVELB __..____ ` EL.=+98.4.. R ELEVEL7 .._.. ^ _ +73'-8" x - Q� LEVEL6 F r ?EL.=W1'-0"_ __....- o o G IEVEL 5 r EL= +4T-0" � O LEVEL4 ^ 'rEL.=+15`-0"._ __..._ � G LEVEL 3 ` rEL.= �25'-0" - . �,LEVEL 2 _ EL= «� 5'-0' BASEFLOOD �13•0"-NAVD ______- (VE 13) GROUNDFLOOR a 'rEL=a4'-0' ._-_ TOP OF MECHANICAL ? EL,= +125'-0"-- � TOP OF PARAPET EL.=+116'�8' � � TOPOFROOF �� 1EL=-t113'-0" � �- -- O LEVEL 9 �EL.=+Bg'-0^ . _ ._. �LEVELB__ _____._. f EL = •86'-0' ri LEVEL7 _ __. f ?EL=+73. 8.' Q � LEVEL 6 i rEL = �61'-0` - G 8� LEVEL 5 �EL=+47'-0' -� � LEVELd � 'rEL.=+35'-0' LEVEL 3 f rEL: +25'-0' � - LEVEL 2 E�5.0.___. __ BASE FLOOD � �19'-0" NAVD - - (VE 13) GROUNDFLOOR m �EL.=-+q'-0' - NORTH EIEVATION - DEVON DRIVE � SCAIE.tltfi'=�'-0' 2 SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE� t/t6' = 1'-0' GLAZING 1,952 SF �� �� . � 5.��'.✓"^=,y,{ OPENINGS �.�: �` y 2,534 SF DECOR4TNE PANELS 4,199 SF TOTAL 8,685 SF FACADE AREA: 13,574 SF PERCENTAGE'. 8,685/ 13,574 = 64 % GLAZING 2,706 SF ��� �`� w OPENINGS ry�,z `r�. �'�' � 3.573 SF . Z�.� DECORATIVE PANELS 2,492 SF TOTAL 8,771 SF FACADE AREA: 14,229 SF PERCENTAGE: 8.771/ 14,229 = 62 % N U 4� � �� � � � � �` � 7 � � CLEAPWATER �]3 9 q; i 3: o 5 �_ �. a a 3,.r� i' a 3� �a rs�s va«���•q .s ,. .�,,o�„y o� N�. . , �_ .- a�d ISNAN L. PETI AR945: FLORIC � PROJECT TI7LE: Z Q F- � Q U � � W � v / i ERANECZ 3 A >N� L.L � ow f"' � � L.L I � w J I v° U PROJECT NO�. SEA14.01 DRAWING TITLE: EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS ISSUE DATE � 2015.03.13 A5 6 PRELIMINARY DESIGN TOP OF MECHANICAL rEL=+�25'-0'-� � � 0 TOP OF PARAPET EL.= 116'-8"�� � TOP OF ROOF _ _ ?EL.=+113'-0' O � LEVEL9 � �_ +98'-p^ . .. ... . _ LEVEL 8 f ?EL.= a86' 4'•. .. �i 'rLEVEL7____.__ f EL: +�3'-9" �- � Q = LEVEL 6 F Ei �.=M1'p• G 8� LEVEL 5 rEL=+qT-0' - � 0 LEVE; d � rEl= 35'-0' � �- � LEVEL 3 � 'rEL=�+25•0`.-_. _.- - LEVEL 2 f EL.= i15'-0'- --- -- BASEFLOOD �18'-0" NAVD - � (VE 13) �� fGROUNDFLOOR a EL=+4'-0' -.. TOP OF MECHANICAL ?EL.= �125'-0' TOP OF PARAPET EL=+716'-6" � _ � 'rTOPOFROOF EL=i113'-0" ____ rLEVEL 9 __ . ^ EL.=+gg'-0" LEVEL 8 ' ?EL.=.98'4^ t,LEVEL7 _ _ _ . ^ EL = i73'-8' � Q m rLEVEL6 ._ F EL.=+61'-0' � - � G �LEVELS _____ EL.=+47'-P � ,rLEVEL4 ._____ _. � EL.=+35'-0" � ��� LEVEL 3 _. � ES' L.=+25'-0" LEVEL 2 �EL=+15'-0' BASEFLOOD 1r 3'-0'NAVp. . (VE 13) �p GROUNDFLOOR m �.q�_p^ . . '_..._._...�. -� . . .. _.... _ _... _. i EAST ELEVATION scn�e. via = i o Z WEST ELEVATION SCALE� 1I18 = 1 �V' GLAZING 2,643 SF F �' ' i.."�'�'�` ��'�'�'�^.. OPENINGS "t� .:. S,. �x� 5.0845F DECORATIVE PANELS 3,767 SF TOTAL 10,844 SF FACADEAREA: 15,579SF PERCENTAGE: 10,894/ 15,579 = 69 % GLAZING 1,900 SF �. _. �,.�y��, ? .. a i�"4 '�°!� � � OPENINGS �'� � G���_ . 3.817 SF DECORATNE PANELS 3,338 SF TOTAL 9,055 SF FACADE AREA: 14,950 SF PERCENTAGE: 9,�55/ 14,950 = 61 % N V 4� � �� CC� � 4.� � � v a� � � CtEARWATER '.C3 P.r,�q:s 51re?'. 33'io �, -r na ao�s i>z> �va am Tn.s �r- � �g �_ .= oCz �a.d e � ISNAN L. PEfI AR945: FLORIC � PROJECT 71TLE: Z Q � � Q U � � W � �/ / i ERANECZ 3 A I >� �� ow � � � Q � w J °vU PROJECTNO: SEA14.01 DRAVNNG TITLE: EXTERIOR ' ELEVATIONS ' ISSUE DATE: 2015.03.13 A5 7 PRELIMINARY DESIGN � Sea Captain - Building Envelope Tabulations - 2015.03.13 Maximim Building envelope Keys Area above 45� Level Gulf Bay Keys Parking Hotel Accessory Garage Gross Area height Levels between 45' and 100' L9 17 17 8, 217 0 8, 217 24,417 L8 17 17 8, 217 0 8, 217 24, 417 L7 17 17 8, 217 0 8, 217 24, 417 L6 17 17 8,217 0 8,217 24,417 8,217 x55' 451,935 Proposed L5 3 3 8,217 0 8,217 24,417 24,417 x 55' 1,342,935 Envelope L4 9 9 28 4, 340 0 10, 642 14, 982 34% 34% L3 9 9 33 4,340 0 15,670 20,010 60'� Permitted L2 9 9 34 4, 844 0 15,124 19, 968 L1 0 23 640 0 15,124 15,764 All garage levels are below 45' elevation 0 98 98 118 55, 249 0 56, 560 111,809 0% 100'� 118 Min Required Parking 55,249 0.00'� Accessory Uses GFA Heated and cooled Accessory Area Breakdown L1 Accessory Spaces L5 0 0 0 0 Accessory Uses Proposed 0 Accessory Uses Permitted 8,287 Accessory Use area remaining 8,287 0.00% 15.00'�0 N � v � ; � � ��n, �..��./ j '�"'� V./ V.�/ �� �azaeo�zaa CLEARWATEN 1�3 Rogars S�r�e:, 33]�56 t. )2] 518 39]3' t_ i2] Y78 �0 ia s dra ��g �s � roPZ.,y o , o��a,a�a�°, �� a�d �av'��, �� �=e� ...oF„��, �� w�thout uuri�!en porin�ss�on feom �e��a, . oP e,a� _.z �, � ISNAN L. PETER4NECZ AR94533 FLORIDA Z Q � a' � � Q �� V oW a J �� w � o� o a w C� _ � � ISSUED DRAWING LOG: PROJECTNO: SEA14.01 DRAWING TITLE: TABULATIONS ISSUE DATE � � � 2015.03.13 SHEET: A5 8 PRELIMINARY DESIGN