The URL can be used to link to this page

FLD2014-11027� 1 a��a��r _�e - _- - �= - :=:�--r �-�.=�-:� '� -- _ -��:--�:_i^ -_ - L'Y- MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: CASE: REQUEST: GENERAL DATA: Applicant/ Owner... ........ Location ... ... ... ............... PropeNty Size ............... Future Land Use Plan. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT January 20, 2015 E.2 FLD2014-11027 Flexible Development application to permit a detached dwelling with a front (north) setback of 20 feet (to dwelling) and front (west) setbacks of 12 feet (to dwelling steps) and 15 feet (to dwelling) as a Residential Infill Project where standards for Residential Infill Projects are guidelines and may be varied in the Medium Density Residential (MDR) District, pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Section 2-304.G.; and an increase in the height of a wall in the front (north) setback from three to six feet pursuant to CDC Section 3-804.A.1. Christopher Blackerby .. 401 Hamilton Crescent; south side of Hamilton Crescent approximately 235 feet west of South Fort Harrison Avenue. .. 0.167 acres Zoning ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .. Special Area Plan ............. Adjacent Zoning.... North. South: East.• West: Existing Land Use............ Proposed Land Use ... ... . Residential Medium (RM) Medium Density Residential (MDR) District None Medium Density Residential (MDR) and Institutional (I) Districts Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District Medium Density Residential (MDR) District (Medium Density Residential (MDR) District Vacant Detached Dwelling Y Ul�.ttl �Lllei Level II Fie�ble Development App�ication Review . a;?� ^" . . - ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 0.167 acre vacant site is located along the south side of Hamilton Crescent approximately 235 feet west of South Fort Harrison Avenue with 76 and 96 feet of lot frontage along the respective north and west property lines. According to City records, the site has been vacant since 2007 and has one curb cut on the west side of the property. There are eleven trees on site including palm, oak, citrus and melaluca. The south subject property is located within the Medium Density Residential (MDR) District. The intent of the MDR District is that development be consistent with the Countywide Future Land Use Plan as required by State law. The uses and development potential of a parcel of land with the MDR District shall be determined by the standards found in this Development Code as well as the Countywide Future Land Use Designation of the property, including any acreage or floor area restrictions set forth in the Rules Concerning the Administration of the Countywide Future Land Use Plan. The Future Land Use Plan category is Residential Medium (RM). The purpose of the RM category is to depict those areas of the county that are now developed, or appropriate to be developed, in a moderately intensive residential manner; and to recognize such areas as primarily well-suited for residential uses that are consistent with the urban qualities, transportation facilities and natural resource characteristics of such areas. The immediate vicinity is characterized by a variety of institutional and residential uses including school (vacant South Ward Elementary) to the north, detached dwellings to the south and west and assisted living facility the east. The neighborhood surrounding the subject property is zoned MDR and Institutional (I) Districts to the north, Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District to the south, MDR District to the east and west. Code Compliance Analysis: There are no active Code Compliance cases for the subject property. Development Proposal: The proposal is to construct a detached dwelling including a PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPIvIENT REVIEW DIVISION NRNER ST W > l � n a n N.T.S PROJECT SITE � a a W O ¢ ORUID RD W � � JASMINE WAY W �_ a 0 PINE ST N K Q _ 0 N DRUID RD LOCATION MAP _._______ 6?3 6?6 � ro• I roZ_ �� -- - -- �o��' ■ S � �� 4 � s N � � 705 C�! M "' ��'',° " ORUID RD W �. �. - � � ZONING MAP 61J 610 cfa �'ncantSclwol � � i N.T.S �MNE SY � � > `s 7?5 � ' D � �a, � a z J0t � � � 4- �s a att�ched � S Q �� aL+tedLfvinA � DweWng � � Fucillly s � '°° 4s��. � � lletacped lletnt�edllweWoRr��" Dwcllings « o h 7+< . . : e a o�„o�W 4"'1 N.T.5 PlNE ST 7t5 DRUID RD _ _ . ,�, EXISTING SURROUNDING USES MAP Community Development Board - January 20, 2015 FLD2014-11027 - Page 2 � C��.N�1 1'� [il��l Levei II Flexible Development Application Review PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT � DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION � . .. ` $;3°.Tk�e,g.. � , .. . . .. . deck and garage with driveway access on the north and west sides of the site. The existing curb cut on the west side of the site will be removed and all existing trees on site are to be removed except for two palms in the northeast corner of the subject property. Pursuant to CDC Section 3- 1205.D.2, four shade trees are required. A condition of approval is included that prior to Certificate of Occupancy the Code required trees or their equivalents are provided. A six-foot wall is proposed along the east property line and between the front of the dwelling and the north property line. The application is being processed as a Residential Infill Project application as a 25 foot front setback is required through a Level One application. The proposal includes a front (north) setback of 20 feet (to dwelling) and front (west) setbacks of 12 feet (to dwelling steps) and 15 feet (to dwelling). Flexibility is allowed to be requested between 10 and 25 feet as part of a Level Two application but only as a Residential Infll Project as detached dwelling is not listed as a Level Two use. The development proposal's compliance with the various development standards of the CDC is discussed below: Special Area Plan: None Community Development Code: The proposal supports the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of the CDC as follows: Section 1-103. B. 2. Ensuring that development and redevelopment will not have a negative impact on the value of surrounding properties and wherever practicable promoting development and redevelopment which will enhance the value of surrounding properties. Surrounding properties include a variety of residential and institutional uses including vacant school to the north, detached and attached dwellings to the west and south and assisted living facility to the east. The proposed detached dwelling will maintain a consistent development pattern and will have a positive effect on those uses by the development of a vacant parcel for a use typical in the neighborhood. Furthermore, the detached dwelling has been designed to be consistent with the surrounding detached dwellings, will add to the tax base of the area and enhance the value of surrounding properties. Therefore, the proposal supports this CDC section. Section 1-103. D. It is the further purpose of this Development Code to make the beautification of the city a matter of the highest prioriry and to require that existing and future uses and structures in the city are attractive and well-maintained to the maximum extent permitted by law. The proposal includes developing a vacant parcel of land with an attractive detached dwelling. Development of the site will promote infill of an otherwise underutilized parcel which should enhance the value of the surrounding properties. The proposed dwelling unit is designed with craftsman architectural elements including a wide front porch, stone veneer and low pitched roof. Therefore, the proposal supports this CDC section. Community Development Board - January 20, 2015 FLD2014-11027 - Page 3 y Clbl41 1TLaLl.l Level II Flexible Oevelo ment A lication Review YLANNING & DEVELOPMENT P PP DEVELOPMENT REVLEW DIVISION � �as.�r : � ;,.. - Section 1-103. E. 3. It is the further purpose of this Development Code to protect and conserve the value of land throughout the city and the value of buildings and improvements upon the land, and minimize the conflicts among the uses of land and buildings. The proposal includes developing a vacant parcel of land with an attractive detached dwelling. Development of the site will promote infill of an otherwise underutilized parcel which should enhance the value of the surrounding properties. The proposed six-foot wall will minimize any conflicts between the detached dwelling use and the assisted living facility to the east and any future institutional use of the property to the north. Therefore, the proposal supports this CDC section. Development Parameters: Densitv: Pursuant to the Countywide Plan Rules and Section 2-301.1, CDC, within the RM future land use plan category, the maa�imum allowable density is 15 units per acre. As the lot area is 7,296 square feet (0.167 acres), two dwelling units are allowed and only one dwelling unit is proposed. Therefore, the proposed density is consistent with the Code provision. Im�ervious Surface Ratio (ISR� Pursuant to the Countywide Plan Rules and Section 2-301.1, CDC, within the RM future land use plan category, the maximum allowable ISR is 0.75. The overall proposed ISR is 0.51, which is consistent with the Code provision. Minimum Lot Area: Pursuant to Table 2-304 of the CDC, within the MDR District there is no minimum lot area for Residential Infill Projects. The lot area of the subject property is 7,296 square feet which exceeds the otherwise applicable minimum development standard of 5,000 square feet found in Table 2-302 and is therefore consistent with the Code provision. Minimum Lot Width: Pursuant to Table 2-304 of the CDC, within the MDR District there is no minimum lot width for Residential Infill Projects. The subject property lot widths are 76 and 96 feet along the north and west property lines, respectively which exceeds the otherwise applicable minimum development standard of 50 feet found in Table 2-302 and is therefore consistent with the Code provision. Minimum Setbacks: Pursuant to Table 2-304, CDC, within the MDR District Residential Infill Projects may have a front setback between 10 feet and 15 feet and a side setback between zero and five feet. Rear setbacks do not apply to the subject site as it is a corner lot with two front and two side setbacks under the provisions of 3-903.D. No flexibility is being requested to the side setbacks and the proposal includes a front (north) setback of 20 feet (to dwelling) and front (west) setbacks of 12 feet (to dwelling steps) and 15 feet (to dwelling). Community Development Board - January 20, 2015 FLD2014-11027 - Page 4 '_ Vl�.ttil 17 (il�l Level II Flexibie Development Application Review PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT "+.��#� , s." r,,.a, :; . . � . DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION The reduction in the front setbacks allows for development consistent with the surrounding development pattern. The following table illustrates the front setbacks of surrounding properties. Pro e Address Use Setback a roximatel 405-411 Hamilton Assisted Living North: 20 feet to building Crescent Facilit 700 Hamilton Crescent Attached Dwellings East: Nine feet to dwelling steps 12 feet to buildin 420 Druid Road Detached Dwelling East: Three feet to gazebo 15 feet to dwellin 422 Druid Road Detached Dwellin West: 15 feet to dwelling Based on the front setbacks of the surrounding properties, the front (north and west) setback reductions for the detached dwelling are justifed and consistent with the existing and emerging development pattern. Maximum Buildin�� Pursuant to Table 2-304 of the CDC, within the MDR District the maximum building height is 30 feet for Residential Infill projects. The building height of the detached dwelling will be 18.42 feet as measured from grade to midpoint of pitched roof, which is consistent with the Code provision. Minimum Off-Street Parkin�: Pursuant to Table 2-304 of the CDC, for Residential Infill projects in the MDR District, two parking spaces are required. The proposal is to provide two parking spaces for the dwelling, which is consistent with the Code provision. Fence/ Wall Hei h�t�. Pursuant to CDC Section 3-804.A.1, masonry walls shall be permitted to a maximum height of six feet in a required front setback area as a Level One (flexible standard development) approval. Such walls shall be architecturally compatible with the principal structure on the property and compatible with the surrounding properties. The proposal includes a six-foot masonry wall starting at the southeast corner of the property, extend north along the entire east property line, extend 56 feet west and then extend directly south to the northwest corner of the garage. A portion of the wall will be in the required front (north) setback area. The wall will be of masonry construction with a stucco finish and will be painted to be consistent with color of the principal building. To allow access from the north side of the property a wooden rolling gate is also proposed. The purpose of the wall is to mitigate sound and visual impacts of the development from the properties to the north and east. The property to the north is currently vacant and was formally occupied by the South Ward Elementary school with the property to the east being an operating assisted living facility. Furthermore, there are two properties (420 and 422 Druid Road) that have existing six foot solid white PVC fencing within the front setback along Hamilton Crescent. The properties are located at the northwest and northeast corners of Druid Road and Hamilton Crescent, respectively. The property at 422 Druid Road is directly south of the subject property. As the wall is architecturally compatible with the principal structure and surrounding properties, the proposal is consistent with the Code provision. Community Development Board - January 20, 2015 FLD2014-11027 - Page 5 � I��LLtl nLtLe� Level II Flexible Development Application Review u.. . . . . . . "s'�'s^ .�,:3 � . . PLANNING & DEVELOP[vfENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION Mechanical Equipment: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-903.H.1, air conditioning and similar mechanical equipment is exempt from the side setback requirements, but such equipment must be screened from view from streets and adjacent properties. Outdoor air conditioning equipment is shown on the plan and shall be screened from view from streets and adjacent properties via the proposed six foot masonry wall located along the north and east property lines, which is consistent with the Code provision. Utilities: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-912, all utility facilities including individual distribution lines shall be installed underground unless such undergrounding is impractical. This proposal will comply with this requirement. Solid Waste: CDC Section 3-201.D.1 requires that solid waste containers be screened from view from streets and adjacent properties. The dwelling unit will be provided a black barrel for solid waste disposal which will be stored in the garage which is consistent with the Code provision. Compliance with General Applicability Standards: The proposal supports the General Applicability requirements of this Code as follows: Section 3-914.A.1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, densiry and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The proposal includes the development of a 0.167 acre vacant parcel for a detached dwelling designed with craftsman architectural elements 18.42 feet in height as measured from grade to midpoint of pitched roo£ The surrounding properties are developed with a variety of residential and institutional uses including detached and attached dwellings, vacant school and assisted living facility. The buildings in the immediate area range from one to two stories with mostly one-story detached dwellings on similarly sized lots as the subject property. And while no particular architectural style is dominant for the dwellings, the proposed design does not feature any departures from the varied architectural styles. Therefore, the proposal supports this CDC section. Section 3-914.A.2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The immediate area is built-out except for the vacant subject property and the proposed detached dwelling will continue an existing development pattern. The proposal will not impair the value of adjacent properties or hinder their redevelopment. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section. Section 3-914.A.3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safery of persons residing or working in the neighborhood. The proposal includes the development of a vacant site for an attractively designed detached dwelling. Developing the property will promote positive infill and remove the potential negative effects of a vacant property such as vegetative over growth, dumping and loitering. The proposal will likely have a positive effect on the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section. Community Development Board - January 20, 2015 FLD2014-11027 - Page 6 ' Vi�r n'aler Level II Flexible Development Application Review nEVSL MENT REVIEW DI�V S ON . �Pa�� a ... . , .. Section 3-914.A.4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. The proposal will and has been designed to have a minimal effect on traffic congestion. Pursuant to Table 2-304 of the CDC, for Residential Infill projects, two parking spaces are required. The proposal includes a garage with area to accommodate two cars and a recreational vehicle (boat). Access to the garage for the boat is proposed via driveway access on the north side of the property and car access to the garage is proposed via driveway access on the west side of the property. Furthermore, there is adequate driveway area on the west side of the property for two off-street parking spaces. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section. Section 3-914.A. S. The proposed development is consistent with the communiry character of the immediate vicinity. As previously discussed, the community character consists primarily of a variety of residential and institutional uses including vacant school to the north, detached and attached dwellings to the west and south and assisted living facility to the east. The proposed detached dwelling will maintain a consistent development pattern and will have a positive effect on those uses by the development of a vacant parcel for an established use typical in the neighborhood. Furthermore, the detached dwelling has been designed to be consistent with the surrounding detached dwellings, will add to the tax base of the area and will enhance the value of surrounding properties. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section. Section 3-914.A.6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. The proposal consists of developing a vacant parcel of land for a detached dwelling. Development of the vacant parcel with a use consistent with the uses in the surrounding area will minimize the existing potential adverse visual, acoustic and olfactory effects associated with a vacant property. Furthermore, the detached dwelling architectural design is compatible with the design of surrounding buildings reducing any potential adverse visual effects. To mitigate against any existing and potential conflicts with the institutional use to the north and assisted living facility to the east, a six-foot wall is proposed which will minimize and adverse acoustic effects though staff does not foresee any being associated with the detached dwelling use. There should be no olfactory impacts of any kind. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section. Compliance with Residential Infill Project: The proposal supports the specific Residential Infill Redevelopment Project criteria pursuant to CDC Section 2-304.G.1-7 as follows: 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from one or more of the following: intensiry; other development standards. As the subject property is a corner lot, there are 25 foot front setbacks along the north and west property lines. The proposed front setback reductions will allow the appropriate development of the vacant lot for a single-family detached dwelling with setbacks sonsitent to those of surrounding properties. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section. Community Development Board - January 20, 2015 FLD2014-11027 - Page 7 � Cl�.4tl T�r�Lt�l Level II Fiexible Develo ment A lication Review PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT P Pp DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION ' �� . , � 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. As previously discussed, the proposal includes the development of a vacant site for an attractively designed single-family detached dwelling. The development will add to the ta�c base and is not expected to have a negative impact on the fair market value of abutting properties. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section. 3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the district. In the MDR District, the detached dwelling use is listed as Level One minimum standard and Flexible Standard use. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section. 4. The uses within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses. As previously discussed, the proposal is for a single-family detached dwelling in a neighborhood characterized by residential and institutional uses such as detached and attached dwellings, vacant school and assisted living facility. There are other detached dwellings to the south and east of the subject property. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section. 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The proposal includes developing a vacant parcel of land with an attractive detached dwelling. Development of the site will promote infill of an otherwise underutilized parcel which should enhance the value of the surrounding properties. The proposed dwelling unit is designed with craftsman architectural elements including a wide front porch, stone veneer and low pitched roof. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section. 6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the Ciry of Clearwater as a whole. As previously discussed, all surrounding properties are developed with a variety of residential and institutional uses such as detached and attached dwellings, vacant school and assisted living facility. The proposed detached dwelling will be compatible with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section. 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height, off-street parking access or other development standards are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate viciniry of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. As previously discussed, the development of the corner lot with reduced setbacks will allow for infill development of a single-family detached dwelling with similar setbacks as the surrounding neighborhood. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section. Community Development Board - January 20, 2015 FLD2014-11027 - Page 8 � C��.ul ►'1'aL�l Level II Flexible Develo ment plication Review PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT P AP DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DiVISION u . . . .. £'-1"` ,�y q � . Section 4-206.D.4: Burden of proof. The burden of proof is upon the applicant to show by substantial competent evidence that he is entitled to the approval requested. The applicant has adequately demonstrated through the submittal of substantial competent evidence that the request is entitled to the approval requested as required by CDC Section 4- 206.D.4. Compliance with Standards and Criteria: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the standards for Residential Infill Projects as per CDC Table 2-304: Standard Proposed Consistentl Inconsistent Density 15 du/ac (2 units) 5.99 du/ac (1 unit) X Impervious Surface Ratio 0.75 0.51 X Minimum Lot Area N/A 7,296 square feet X Minimum Lot Width N/A 76 (north property line) X 96 (west property line) Minimum Setbacks Front (north): 10-25 feet 20 feet X Front (west): 10-25 feet 12 feet (to dwelling steps) 15 feet (to dwelling) Side (south): zero-five feet five feet (to dwelling) Side (east): zero-five feet five feet (to dwelling) Maximum Height 30-50 feet 18.42 feet X Minimum Off-Street Two spaces per dwelling unit Two spaces X Parkin � See analysis in Staff Report Community Development Board - January 20, 2015 FLD2014-11027 - Page 9 ' Ll�.tU 17�L�1 Level II Flexible DevelopmentApplicatlon Review .. . �r" . . .. PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION Compliance with Flexibility Criteria: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per CDC Section 2-304.G.1-7. (Residential Infill Project): 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from one or more of the following: intensity; other development standards. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. 3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the district. 4. The uses within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses. 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development 6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function which enhances the community chazacter of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height, off-street parking access or other development standards are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. See analysis in Stafj'Report Consistent` � Inconsistent X X X X X X X Compliance with General Applicability Standards: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3-914.A: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in hannony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. � See analysis in Staff Report Consistent' I Inconsistent X �— X X X X X SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meeting of December 4, 2014, and deemed the development proposal to be legally sufficient, based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: Community Development Board - January 20, 2015 FLD2014-11027 - Page 10 � C�utl 1't �L�1 Level II Flexible Develo ment A lication Review PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT P Pp DEVELOP[viENT REVIEW DIVISION .,_ .. � a�a�� e=- Findings of Fact: The Planning and Development Department, having reviewed all evidence submitted by the applicant and requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact: 1. That the 0.167 acre site is located on the south side of Hamilton Crescent, approximately 235 feet west of South Fort Harrison Avenue; 2. That the subject property lot widths are 76 and 96 feet along the north and west property lines, respectively; 3. That the property is currently vacant; 4. That the subject property is located within the Medium Density Residential (MDR) District and the Residential Medium (RM) Future Land Use Plan category; 5. That the proposal is to redevelop the subject property with a single-family detached dwelling; 6. That the proposal includes a front (north) setback of 20 feet (to dwelling) and front (west) setbacks of 12 feet (to dwelling steps) and 15 feet (to dwelling); 7. That no flexibility is being requested to side setbacks, building height or number of off-street parking spaces; and 8. That there are no active Code Compliance cases for the subject property. Conclusions of Law: The Planning and Development Department, having made the above findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the pattern of development of the surrounding neighborhood; 2. That the proposal is consistent with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of the CDC pursuant to CDC Section 1-103; 3. That the proposal is consistent with the intent of the MDR District and RM FLUP classification; 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards pursuant to CDC Table 2- 301.1 (MDR District); 5. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards pursuant to CDC Table 2-304 (MDR District); 6. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards pursuant to CDC Section 3- 804.A.1 (MDR District fence height standards); 7. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria pursuant to CDC Section 2-304.G.; and 8. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals pursuant to CDC Section 3-914.A. Based upon the above, the Planning and Development Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development application to permit a detached dwelling with a front (north) setback of 20 feet (to dwelling) and front (west) setbacks of 12 feet (to dwelling steps) and 15 feet (to dwelling) as a Residential Infill Project where standaxds for Residential Infill Projects are guidelines and may be varied in the Medium Density Residential (MDR) District, pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Section 2-304.G.; and an increase in the height of a wall in the front (north) setback from three to six feet pursuant to CDC Section 3-804.A.1., subject to the following conditions: Community Development Board - January 20, 2015 FLD2014-11027 - Page 11 ' V��1 1'1�L�1 Level II Flexible DevelopmentAppiication Review . �°s .w.� .� � , . .. PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION Conditions of Approval: 1. That the final design of the dwelling and wall be generally consistent with the plans approved by the CDB; 2. That the required three-foot landscape buffer on the north side of the proposed wall be 3 4. Q 7 planted consistent with the Landscaping standards pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202; That application for a building permit be submitted no later than January 20, 2016, unless time extensions are granted pursuant to CDC Section 4-407; That prior to the issuance of any permit, all requirements of the Land Resource, Engineering and Environmental Departments be addressed; That prior to the issuance of any building permits, the Fire Department may require the provision of a Water Study performed by a Fire Protection Engineer in order to ensure that an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of the project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required, then the water supply must be able to supply 150 percent of its rated capacity; That prior to Certificate of Occupancy the Code required trees or their equivalents be provided; That issuance of a development permit by the City of Clearwater does not in any way create any right on the part of an applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the City for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law; and That all other applicable local, state and/or federal permits be obtained before commencement of the development. Prepared by Planning and Development Department Staff: Matt Jackson, Planner III ATTACHMENTS: Resume, Photographs Community Development Board - January 20, 2015 FLD2014-1102� - Page 12 Looking southeast at the subject property. Louking north from the west side of the subject properly. Looking southeast at property iniu�edfatcly s��uth uf the sul�jcct property (422 Druid Road). Looking southeast at property immediately east of the subject properiy. Looking west from the subject property. Looking along east properiy line of property located southwest of subject properiy (420 Druid Road). 401 Hamilton Crescent Road FLD2014-11027 Matthew Jackson 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 (727) 562-4504 matthew.iackson a(�,mvclearwater.com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE ❑ Planner III February 2013 to present City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida Duties include performing the technical review and preparation of staff reports for various land development applications, the organization of data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports, and making presentations to various City Boards and Committees. ❑ Planner II Ciry of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida May 2011 to February 2013 October 2008 to June 2010 Regulate growth and development of the City in accordance with land resource ordinances and regulations related to community development. Landscape plan review including: conceptual, and variance. Reviews and analyzes site plans and conducts field studies to determine the integrity of development plans and their compatibility with surroundings. Interdepartmental and zoning assistance. Respond as a City representative to citizens, City officials, and businesses concerning ordinances and regulations. Make recommendations and presentations at staff level at various review committees, boards, and meetings. ❑ Planner I Calvin-Giordano and Associates, Fort Lauderdale, Florida May 2005 to December 2007 Project manager for various development applications such as plat, site plan, rezoning and variances. In-depth government agency, in-house and client coordination to ensure that the projects maintained submittal schedules stayed within budget constraints and attained approval. Schedule and lead project kick-off ineetings, ensure municipal project conditions were resolved, produce supporting documents and make site visits as well. Research and prepare due diligence reports including subject matter such as zoning, land uses, densities, available public utilities and land development costs. Member of emergency mitigation committee formed to prepare and mitigate for natural or man-made disasters affecting Calvin, Giordano and Associates and local municipalities. ❑ Manager Church Street Entertainment, Orlando, Florida September 1999 to February 2004 Supervised and managed daytime and nighttime operations of a bar and nightclub entertainment complex including 100+ staf£ Conducted hiring and training operations including security and inventory control. Managed and reconciled nightly gross revenues as well as preparing and delivering deposits. Assisted in taking inventory and preparing weekly inventory orders, marketing and special events. o Linguist ZIS Army, Fort Campbell, KY October 1991 to October 1995 Maintain fluency in the Arabic language and knowledge of customs and culture as well as military readiness for possible deployments or training operations. Co-managed intelligence gathering operation in Haiti including coordination between multiple Special Forces units and civilian authorities. Interpreter between U.S. and Egyptian soldiers during training exercises. Liaison between Special Forces battalions to coordinate certification training. EDUCATION o Master of Arts, Urban and Regional Planning, Florida Atlantic University, 2007 ❑ Bachelor of Arts, Urban and Regional Planning, Rollins College, 2004 .� �, �� > U Pl�nning & Development Department _ _ E��eiapr�ent Applicatian �etached Dweflirtgs, Dr�plexes orAssaciated Access�ry tJse/Structures I7 I� INCIli1ABENt UPON THE APPifCAhIT TO SUBMIT COMpLETE AND CORREtT tNfORMAT�UN. AiJY M[SLEADlNG, DECEPTlVE, fMCOMPLETE OR INCORttECT IN�ORMA710N MAY iM1tVALi�ATE YOUR APPLIC:ATiON, ALl APPLICATtQ�1S ARE TQ BE �iLLED qk1T COMPLEiELY AIVd CORitECTCY, Al�ID 5UBMii7�C)1N PERS�N E1Vfl FA�X CfR DELIVERtESj 7i) THE PLANlUENC & O�EVElOPMEN7 CIEPARTMEIVT BY MdON f}fli THE SCNEDIii.Et3 DEAb�.i1NE DATE. A TU7AL OF 11 COMPLETE SETS OF PLAMS AKU APf'LICRTiQN MATfRiAlS (1 ORIGINAL AND 20 GOPIES) AS REQUIRED Wt7'HiN AI2E TO BE StlBMiITTEp FOR REVIEW 8V THE DE1/ELOPMENT RE1liEW COMh11iiEE. 5i16SEQiJENT St1BMlTiAL Eait THE COMMUNITY C?fVEi€}P'MENT BC►ARO Wili !tE€lU1RE i5 CONlPIETE SETS OF �LANS AiVt� APPLICATiCJN MATERIALS (1 OR1GiNRL AND I4 CC)P[E5}. AI.ANS kMfl /kPPLiCATi0N5 AR£ REC2UlREU 7O BE CUtl11TED, STAPi.ED AMt} fOL iHE APPLICANT, BY FiL1N� THiS APPLICAiIOfV, AGREES Tb �OMPLY WCTH Ali CAMMUNITY D�VELOPMENT [OE3E. FIRE QEPT PREllMaRY SIT� PtAEJ REV}EW FEE: $2U0 APPliG0.ilON �EE: $34Q PROPERTY OW4�tER (PER UEED�: MAILItdG ADDRE55� PWC}NE NUMBER: �r ,uu� �u� � � �rr �� ; � ' � :° � � � E[�AA! L: _.._. t : '1 4. t � �,�° � "_A t �'t �C"�Y� i�_�� {,,,� 3--�`i A�EC.T t3R �t€RRESEi�YA7iVE. MAILING AQORESS; PNONE NUMI6ER: EMAl�: ADDRESSO�SUBI�C7PROPERI'Y: �� ,a iW,,- .� °` .._ _ �"�F�?�-��1t.... .` gt• ` �c. �::. �.� �..�.. �� _._.._ _.._ PARCEi NUMBER{S�: _ I'�e�'Z.... ��'�_:.�- ��> �a ��a � •-C3i.' � � �;';C,.� �(:..'' ____ _�__ !£GAL DESCRIPTION: ________ � � t� ,� �� . ' � �' __� � i..:� . {=+y" 1 � � ��. Y�- °�..�,� �------•---� --�-- __i.�........._. �- �� .�� .W..�� __ ______�� PROPOSEfl U5E(S}: `°, � �� DESCRIPTION OF REQUE51`: Specifcol�y rdentify the rbqueSY (inei�,de all reqvgstrd code flexibilrty; �.�., reciuctian in required rrurrrber af ��orking spntrs, height setE�acks, Pot srze, 1ot width, sper.'1fiC use. Ntc',1: _.... _.. .. �`�.`� `"-� ` t�3at�€tia�g & Dev�zto�a�enz L3e{��rYrrta�i. ��3Ct S. fieiyrtke ;��u�s�ra:€�, t:lea�r�.a�i�r, ��. 33?�a6, 7�1: �%2i-3�'a2��a67, F�x: 727-652-4�56 •''y^ $�£• 'j C� 7 P�L`d45�Ej �'if��`js �;: .� 0 , � . 4 # Plannin� & Development Department Fle�ible ��r�lopment Applicatlon I�ata Sheet PLEASE EN5UFtE TNAT TWE fC1LLOWING ENFORMATIQN 15 FIILED QUT, lN t75 ENTIRETY. FAILt1RE 7U COMPLE°TE 71i1S Ft3RM WILL RESULT IN Y{�UR APPII{:ATIOIV BE�M(� �OUNQ iNCOMPEETE liWC3 PQS5IBLY UEFERREI? UNTiL THE FC3LLOWtNG APPLPCA7{flN Cl"CLE. ZONING DISTRfCT: ��`� ��``, "� �IJTURE LAKD USE PWIV DESIGNATIOtd; �� EXIS7iNG USE (currently existing on sitej: �� +'�� --� �``� �� PRiiPC#SED USE (new use, F# any: plus existin�, if to remain}: �� StTE ARfA: �� t''{ y�' sq. ft. { CsR055 F104R AREA (tptal sc{�rare footage of aEi buildings): �xistin�_ ._._..._...�..�� sq. �T. Proposed: �i":.�:'�'.��.__._�`�� sq. �#. €NaximumAllowable: ��(,:t.��_ sq.�t. , � ��..� atres GRQSS FLOClR AREA (ta;a# zquare foot�gt devnte�i to each use, if Chere will be muitiple �ses�: First use: '� sq. �t. Second use: Thirri ��cr?� „r � ${�. ft. sc� ft. Ft{3QR A�REA 32,AT1� (tntal square #noYage c�f alk buiidings divided by the tatai squ�re foatage ot entire siLeJ: Existing: _,.�._..._._�t!` �..�_�. PiQpo52d: �'� � _ Maximum Aflawabte: ; �"ri.✓ BUlLDING GOYERAGEf fOUTPRINT (L" iSour zqu�re toocage of al1 bui�dings}: Existing: �i sq. �t. (_ �..i 3fi o# site) Proposed: �3't'� sq. ¢Y. ( � 2-- 3`� of site) Maximum Permitted: °�fr.,�4 sq. ±t. � _ __ �C� �i6 af sitej eip y..a wqIY �� n'� �II (Iptlll9. II�+� �iJlll! f� Ij�ll � � �.� . m4u i i CaREEN 5PACE WITHEN VI��H1CC11A�i USE AREA (�re.en space wiYhin the p�rking IoC and �t�te�rtor o€ si�e; nctt perirn�ter bt�fferj�: Extstin�: __ i� � sq, �[. {� °Je of sitej Proposed: sq. (t. ( `,� af site� VEHICUtAR U5E AREA (parking spacc�s, dr'sve a3sles, lpadin� areaJ: ExistEng: `." (�j sq. �t, { � _ "Yo of sitej � , ,_. _..� ._ _._. ___. �.�.. . __ p {�G�$!,�� sq. ft. [ � �n csFsite} F'ra aseci: P1ans�ii�g s3 47�v¢lag��r��r�t [)¢�aa��ne��t. 90t� S. �R�r�-RE�r Av��a��._ �:i�:<Pevraier: ��, 33, ��i> "��1: 7�7��-�S�,i� ;=:�x, i�i-��2��365 '-�q{: � �; � i��r•ris,�c3 Cl jl12 � iMFERVidU5 5URFACE RRTlO (total square fontage of imp�rviaus areas divided by Yhe total square footage of entire site}: Existing: (�, �.i Proposed: ---� � , �-�'' � Maxbmum perrr�iCted: _--.�...__''��_'��`..� -- OEtJSi'fY (units, rooms or beds per acre):. Existing: �.,� � P�oposed: � Maximam Pertnitted: � OFF-STREET PARKING- Existing: �i.�? Prapased: �� W Minimum Required: �_ _�_—_-- BUILDENG tlElGliT: ExistirFg: Proposed: Maximum P�rmitted �S� + 1Vote: A parkrng demand siudy musi be provrded !n conjunction 4vith pny request to reduce the amount of requrred off-street parking spoces. P/eose see the odopted Porking Demantt Study Guidelines for further infprmat+on. WHAT 15 7HE ESTIiVEATED 70TAL VALt1E OF THE PR0IECT ilPOlV COMPtET14N? $�S�f„a �,,? ZONiNG DISTRICi5 FOR ALL ADiACENT PROPERiY: .--- North: �--�-- Sauth: E�Si: west: STATE Qf Ftt3RI0A, C!DtJNiY OF PtNELIAS !, the undersigned, acknowledge that ali S+�om Eo and subscribed befare me Lhis representatians made in this appGcation are true and �( ) � acturate to the best of my knowledge and authorize �'-�`� � Ciry representatives to visit and photagr�ph the prnperty described in this application. �� A �, pfOCIUCECI �. Signature of proper#y awner- Notary pu t, My eommissio pires: �� 9 �� '�,.r��J�l�9� �' �"��,�s='��°�" l� __...._._..........____ day a# to me andJar by � is person�lly knawn has �.i_Qi'\i$S IC�P.Y4tIflCditOtl. ,��r r,�s �j8,�f6d[Cltt� �°�'�� NGtary PUblic �� S�e �f fk�tid� r� �` MY C4MMI�SION � F,� �1 �its� � +��' �� !� Qdanning & Oe�e4c��dnenf �eozrtrnent. :ot; :S. t�9u-t#e :�:��er=.�rr. Cle3r.=a�fer. t=L 33755, 7e1: i 2Z-�62 356F, �a:Y; 7�a-SS��i86� P:�ge 3 0€ "7 �c?�ei�eci �'�li? r� Planning & L3evelo�rment UepartmenC � �, �� Fle�ibie Development App�icatian `� Site Plan Subxn��tal ��ckage Check list IN ADDIi{ON TO THE Ct►MPLETED �LEXIB�.E DEVELdPMEhST (Fl.Dj APPLtCRTiON, ALL FLD APPLtCAI'It3N5 �OR R StKiCaLE-FAMILY DE7A�HEI7 DWEILiWG, DUPLE7t, t7R ACCESSORY USEJSTRUC'TURE ASSOCtATfC1 WiTH ElTFlER A SI#+IGLf-FANtlEY DETA+CliED OWELI:tNG OR Dt1ALEX SHRIL INfIUDE A PLdT PWN WITH 'iHE FOLLQWlI�t� INFORMATl�N: C] Responses ta the Genera! Appiic�l�ility criteria �s set iorth in Sectian 3-914.A. The attached flexib{e peveiopment Applic�tian General Applicabiiity Crit�ria sheet shaf{ be used tcr provide these respanses. i.2 Respanses to the itexibility criteria for the speti#ic use{s) bei�g requested as set forth in the Zaning Distr�ct(s) in which the subject praperty is Eatated. The attached Flexible �avelopment Application FlexibiliYy Criteria sheet shall be Used to provide these responses. Ll A�igned and sealed survey of the proper�y prepared hy a registered iand surveyor includinp, the (ocaLion c�f the property, dimensions, acreage, lotation of at# turrent str�cturesJirnprovements, iocation of all public and private e�sements ineluding otficiai records boak and page numbers and street right(s}-r�f-way within �nd adjaeent to th� site. U!f the appiication would resuit in the rernoval or r�locatian of mobiie home awners res+ding in a rnobile home park as provided in F.S. § 723.483, the appl'icafion must provide thai infarmation required 6y Sectian 4-2D2.A.5. �i If this applicatiqn is bein� submftted for Ch� purpase af a boatlift, carwaik, davit, dock, marina, pier, seawaf{ or other sim�lar marine �tructure, then the appl'icatic�n m�st provide detaiied pfans and speciftcat�ons prepared by a FlaEida prafessionat engineer, bearing �he seal arrd signature af the engineer, except signed and seated pkans shal( not be required for the repair or replacerr�ent af decking, strirtggrs, raiiing, lowe�r kandings, tie piies, ar the patcfiing ar reiniorting of existing pFlin� on private and commercial dacks. � A tree survey showing the tucatian, DBH f,diarnet�r at b�east height}, anrE species on the parcel proposed (or developrnerat with a[3BH of faur inches or more and idertifying thase trees proposec3 tobe remoued, i�1 A sit� pf�n wiih thg fo!lowing inforrnaYian: C3 North arraw, scaie, �ocatian map and date prepared. C] loeation of the Goastat Cc�nstruction Conirol Line {CCCL}, whether the prpperty is lacat€�d within a Sp�cial �lond Ftazard Area, and tf�e Base �laod Elevation (BFE} af the properiy, as applieable J Cocafiion, setbacks and use of ail existing and propased building and struetures. J Location at all existing and prc�pased parking are�s, sidew�lk� and driv�ways. C1 locaiian, type of rnt�tenai and herght of a!I existing and proposed fences. ;.) Location af ail existing and �rraposed utilities, including water, sewer, �as, arid starrnwater. 1..) location of all exis`ing utitity easements, inclucting Offici�f Reeords br�ak anti pa�e numbers, and any proposed utility easements. t� BuiEding ar structur� elevation d�awing; that c4epicc the proposed buriding height, building materdais, and cancealment of a{I mechanical equipment located on the roof. �� 1 ��...��a��9�� '�¢r ��;F�'�.. t'iarro��sni� ��ewr�I<3pr:��rat ��e��ri.sna+at� :IitU:a. �yrf@e Av.snae� t,ie<arvxat�rr, �L 33736, ieC; 727-56?-4557': ��x: 72?_562-4S6S i�ay�; �f 3P % rys�wts�c# ik�?1 � City of Clearwater Planning and Development Department Flexible Development Application General Applicability Criteria 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The proposed SFR is planned at 2600 sq ft of living space. It meets all MDR guidelines. It is in harmony with the adjacent properties which include an assisted living facility, two multi-family properties and two other SFR. Adjacent properties have reduced setbacks as well as fences which go along the side of the properties. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The planned SFR will not adversely affect any of the surrounding properties. It will improve the overall character and quality of the area. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of any person working or living in the area. It will not adversely affect the health or safety of any person working or living in the area. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. Flexible Development Application — Residential Infill Project — 401 Hamilton Crescent, Clearwater FL, 33755 All required off street parking will be provided as well as garage parking. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The home design is consistent with the area. The adjacent properties have reduced setbacks and fences around the sides of the properties. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. The proposed SFR will not adversely affect any adjacent properties. ��__: �_ n_..��.�..�..... n....�•....a: o....:.1....�:..1 �hi:ll D�n:n�� _ AA1 I-I�m�ltnn frcc�ant ('IaarwatQr FL; 33755 �exit�-!�C vCVCwN�ucn� r�NN�i�,au'tii� ° i�ca�a�c��ua� m ..�., •', - -- City of Clearwater Planning and Development Department Flexible Development Application Flexibility Criteria G. Residential infill projects. 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from one or more of the following: intensity; other development standards; The property is a corner lot sized 96' wide by 76' deep. Corner lots require 25 setbacks on each side which fronts the road. The lot is not very large and the existing setback requirements greatly reduce the potential building area and possibility of having a back yard. z. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties; A new SFR will not reduce the value of any abutting properties. 3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the district; A SFR is otherwise permitted in this district. 4. The uses within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses; A SFR is compatible with the adjacent homes in the area. Flexible Development Application — Residential Infill Projed — 401 Hamilton Crescent, Clearwater FL, 33755 �. The development of the parce! proposed for development as a residentia! infill project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; A new SFR will upgrade the immediate vicinity. Its current use is a vacant lot. 6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a �rvv.hole; A new SFR of this style will enhance the community character of the immediate vicinity. r�___:Lr�•.... • ..1 �.. 1..+ ...:.J�L, '.,,.J r�.�t4,.Y�Lt- I�t iirht n�ff ctrovt e. r�ex�uul�y ii! ►eyu►u �v,v� w�uut� ici{ui��u �c�a�u�n�j ��c�y��j v1J �...��.. parking access or other development standards are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. Reducing the front set back to 12 feet and the side setback to 20 feet is consistent with other adjacent properties and will allow vacant land to be developed into a new SFR that will benefit the area. Fiexipie ueveiopmeni wppiicaiion — icesiaeniiai iniiii r�vjeci-4i,� �a�� 2sc�r�t, �l2a�:: .^cC �� ++�++ 6 ft Masonry Wall/Fence on North Side of Property: Because this is a corner lot, both sides with street frontage are considered "fronts". Section3-804. Height requirements. A. �. In the MDR and MHDR zoning districts, brick or other masonry walls or walls with masonry columns linked by substantial grill work shall be permitted to a maximum height of six feet in a required front setback area as a Level one (flexible standard developmentJ approval. Such walls shall be architecturally compatible with the principal structure on the property and compatible with the surrounding properties. This property is located in the MDR zoning district. The masonry wall will be stucco which matches the exterior of the house and the surrounding properties. It will include the required 3 foot landscaping setback. Adjacent properties which are also corner lots (420 and 422 Druid) have fences which run along with side of the property and have side vehicle access. A fence on this side of the property will allow a functional backyard and privacy from the assisted living facility located to the East and any future Institutional development on the current site of the South Ward Elementary school. Flexible Development Application — Residential Infill Project — 401 Hamilton Crescent, Clearwater FL, 33755 �tJIJ i fQl�lilVii r.I��rS��'iii — Pi��t�r� iQ tl ip VV'�SL Flexible Development Application — Residentiai inTiii rroject — 4ui riamiiion i,resce��i, i,ieaPwaici F�, »: �� 700 Hamilton Crescent — Property to the West � �� F:� � �-.> a� �� `�,�� .�,`� y� � Flexible Development Application — Residential Infill Project — 401 Hamilton Crescent, Clearwater FL, 33755 i i�fJ�i t�ji i� � f��i �i�vi i i�i��rv'�ii� � ,�.�. � •� ., �� ,�� r � _ �,: � �� Flexible Development Application — Resiqentiai iniili Nroject — 4ui i-iamiiton �resceni, �iearwaier �L, 33i55 � � n M M J LL V d r eo 3 � �o a, u y c d � � v L U C O a+ .� �0 2 N � I r V dl �O � a w c �o r c ai v �N �1 � � i 0 r �o � .Q a a � _ �, E a 0 'a, � a � d � .X ai LL Pr�p�rty tt� th� Eas� ��11 �l�m,;l�c„ �rescent —,�s��sted ! iv6ng ��Liiity h12Xip12 U2VEIOpRle11L APpIICBtIOn — KeSlOeflilal InTlll YfojeCi —%+vi riainiiYui� i.ic5fci�i� �i'cai w'a ci �i., .1.7/.CJJ Property to the East — 411 Hamilton Crescent — Assisted Living Facility Flexible Development Application — Residential Infill Project — 401 Hamilton Crescent, Clearwater FL, 33755 Property is approximately 20 feet from Sidewalk Flexibie Deveiopment Appiicaiion — Kesideniiai iniiii Projeci — 4ui riamiiiv�� i,�es�c��, ��ea� wa�2� fL� .�JJ% JF! � �� - �< a..,,__ � �_ ,�._ ,. _ : :_, Pr��erty� ta �h� S�uth — !�� ruiu Flexible Development Application — Residential Infiil Project — 4ui i-iamiiton Cresceni, Ciearwaier F�, .33%77 Property has both a front and side driveway and a fence on side of house Flexible Development Application — Residential Infill Project — 401 Hamilton Crescent, Clearwater FL, 33755 `� --�� =�, � `� :`� A��. � Approximately 19 feet from sidewalk Flexible Deveiopment Appiication — ttesideniiai inriii 'rrojeci — 4vi riamiii�n «es�en�, ��ea�;;�;a�2r �� J.�l%.Ci.CI Flexible Development Application — Residential Infill Project — 401 Hamilton Crescent, Clearwater FL, 33755 5��th�►L��s�2r� Rr�,�2rty, —��J �ruid — ANpr�x��te 6�o�t Set�a�k Fl2xiplC UeveiOpmeni Appiitaiion — Kesideniiai iniiii rrojeci — 4�i riamii2vii C�eSeei�i, �icai �iva�c� �L, >;: �5 Southwestern Property — 420 Druid — Approximate 6 Foot Setback Flexible Development Application — Residential Infill Project — 401 Hamilton Crescent, Clearwater FL, 33755 ��ti �i't,iit� - �ZiiCE c�ii �ii,iC ui Pi��2i iji Wi�i'i �iitvt� ��iii ji �a�ES � � � .� Flexible Development Application — Residential Infill Project — 401 Hamilton Crescent, �iearwa"ter r�, jji55 Property to the North - South Ward Elementary — Abandoned School �. ��,; .�� Flexible Development Application — Residential Infill Project — 401 Hamilton Crescent, Clearwater FL, 33755 Pr��r�y �V th� �arth - Scut" `�`Jar� El��en�a; r— A�a�u�;�e� Svhvv! �� P �r � �� `' � -� , �� > � � '`�.- � �� - �� s-� ----��-- � µ� C, ff � � � 7 �� ?—� ��y. �< � � � �:,= . � I�4° �� ,�'. � 4: . k _ ' � �'°�'� .a""��"".:; , . 5 �+�d4� ; �.� �� :__< �� . �� . <�,� . _ �„ ; a >� �.'.,�1�,.� � . � . . . e. � _ �� r' � � � � s�^;:, v:� � � � � �s .. � � ..�;�> c,��~� `" � Flexible Deveiopment Appiication — Kesidentiai inTiii rrojeci — 4ui Hamiiion i,rescenc, Ciea�waiei FL, 33: �5 � ,....� Chis�� ii� `' �`h� �,.1�5 �tore • � �� „ _ � . . � �,��`�` Cle�r��r �1a�e� St��p �� i��i[ 5��. 'sr�� . �,� � Scts�tf� it�t�rc� - � F6arF�r ��E� �' �ternerrtary Schcttst ! � ;t�1�li� Fdrg43 E'��i#t �,: � : � . . _,� � � �:_ �� f � � �. - Subj�c# P`ra�recty - � a41 tiamEt�orr c.resce�t '�'�"° �_ � � r P_, � -; �' ��€�� £� � F �x.. _,L c � _ , � 4 A E � . _i.� �ii �� , y� �'�• �. r ,F � � �: ,� ;� � � � ` A`�`� ��g€€��s �i�rs�} �:� 3�0 ��r�t�� c.�e�nc aia�� _: � cr�gne � �`. . � � � � 82tf E7�ui� 432 t3ntid �" Road �� ,Ex> _ , � �.�-� - � ._,� �_«.�, � .. . .� �,. _ ., ,�,�_ . �� _ �v>' z_., .w ._ � �r ��t.�1� �� . , �e r �_ �� . � a.: � �...- � , � . �. � �. ��t�� r�.� ,�` � �t�� F�K ��iv� �. : , .. . �;; .. , ;, < : � Flexibie Development Application — Residential Infill Project — 401 Hamilton Crescent, Clearwater FL, 33755 �' I'I?I::E. I.�I�;fiti:Ni3 II � F,qtna {S?2£ AS NOiEtl) I � I]:aeC ,!SrZt ns' ,4pY'FAJ � � G"rus fst?c ns N��tt_r�; I}�*� s�€i_k�.€W��:,: ('�u`� A5 NdrFlij� : I . � uNfiNeK�h ,'r2[ AS vor[CJ i r ,: e�r':^.� :?;r.'r °,oR�tafi, �� I� t �� ,_ �� r, hi Se�ac.r dfan.eo,s � ,......� .... £?ewtrcn = .i�.�i�' � 1�T��d�j � fJ.� F Tfti *� ��,i ?' z9 u � 35-` !ti hx ej Wr�y � �F �' .. . . .."i ., ah�, i14,��g�{ PVY4lf'tiPM T`4 x� °u,. � . .. .... �� UX;trgh Gur6 (ippacni)...........-.—._.�...�..q ....�,. �� . �: � � ° - � SN't'.7 � .. .....�.....�,......d ._ .��.�F �...° f .�d . �q 3` Cancretr Wcik� . '7� g . t Q � .... . � .,.. �,� .. � � � �, 1� fASr _ � �+�.r�.' r,kj � • rtP I- _. �:r, �s.raa` (P,i �i � G,�+c' f!) f � �� '�� `3 rs" �� `tia�ra a� &cv�?nry,�r 1 � � aK � � i t ..�...;. i �`° :as +�;t�.+�e Aletdr � � �r � � Utirma&�.r . �� k� � � • � - � �.. _ u..,+.,_r.,. �� .wo- � _ � P4rd(a� La€ L+`,f+�� f<° ��; � �.,�� r �1 .� � �,�^ ; i � f��. ,� �, � �: � , � aa � I � " �»` ��. , � �, ��✓ � � �° .� ,�� , -4`�. � � � I - � � � � (� � � '" '�- `� i `"; t � . ,� � -[ � � � � � ��?~ � � . � : .o' a � ; srtr&ff , oveN:,�«A �a�r;r�iex a , * u Wcaet kt'�Ftiy ae e,��!rr Paw �. l4�ct�r G7�,4 Yutwe ..:-�t , I L9, ��b86.� � ha�?eat.�� [�semeni � ,n�rcteta �.8[Cl �'i0i �CEB � "" � ,� staA p . ; ,a:�,grr / � ro . ro � � �g � : �; ,�� i � 5$9'4rsIW. 75,56'th(} FCi�Ptf`� i�' .ti .. 4 1 a � �� $• � ?�.ea' (o, .a� �za3st , � �i IV� V8lC I . � Fcnce /+ i t � .;.� � � ?'f.�1��i�.i`� �if!�.� I 4.ZC� (At� � � 030� S�h f''tfiT �f4f.tk .$ daAGF &.J Fents tite, i U.3.a' NoKh _,^'.`S . �!' :7 7a Flexible Development Application — Residentiai Infiii Project — 4�1 hamiiton �resceni, �iearwater F�, s3755 401 Hamil#on Crescent Site P�an .��.��`C��' GI;�`�'C�'��,��. ` �� .a�tm: pa,��e� :. ;.� �� t}n�Wa}jStreet�-� �«--�== e u�sr;r,�r:t c�,rb [ry.�; +) �' < ` IMi�..li��.� .rir.., Wii� -� ��.r '��y ,_ .� -_ ....,- . . .. I ._ . ..`3�RtandscaR'rreg f {gaiey___ � 2Dft Y�d 2Ui# i�f1YE� I waY � , iaxzo �Yt - � � I [�rivaway Garage � � �� ; Y2x20 4i -'y3�4.��.. � � �� w ;.,,,� ; w� � ..,„ �. .a � �` � y I Y �C 6 ��`+ �, : ' 1 ��o � F�c House s_ . vnr� b �ft � ��•.-�•'�� ,.•.�� . 3 � � � � � .� �._.....�� ,� a � a2��w;aa� N � I�1 � s��e, Vi��4er i`i35 � Masonry �� Wall - 6 ft i}¢c�t ' S ft � �n � I. . .... "��. S feet I �. . �, i� . ....... ..._.... ... _ . . . ... . . ... — FG71t ?%p j� � 5_89'4i'#!'14. T5,5&' (A�! RCS f265B f�. t�cs. ,`•�k ; � � � • p4� 7& t70 ` (d� d j f ence � 4 Of}' (P � - �+ r�� tr„� f-liil?E��',n' vAKS � I a.l r' (M,� I � !ptf�T F./C)LUt 7, PAC,F 6,5J Fenca Line _ � 0.30" Scuth !?„�:J' Norih t�ts 7 & 9 Flexible Development Application — Residential Infill Project — 401 Hamilton Crescent, Clearwater FL, 33755 � � � �� :�� v ��. Wood panel sliding gate 6 ft tail �5n wooa North ��e �f property �.� �� . ;� Flexible Development Application — Kesiqentiai inTiii Nroject — 4ui Hamiiion Cresceni, i.iearwaier rL, 33%�5 i��rf �+ .4��`�� `�� CIT� OF LEAR�ATER �,s_'��' Pia:v�vt�vc; & D��xo�F�rc� n�e,�x•�:�tE�rr ��+ = �� Pc��r O�ir.� Bo?c 4?4f3, CrEnx�c�a�?x, Fcaxme 33?58-4'=�f3 S,y��ej�`,,��iO4 i�IUNI(:lPAL SGIL4'IGEti SI71I1?IFG, 1�O Sni:Tfi MY'R7'LE �ivF:vtr�, E;c�v��rea, FLnxma 33756 �•>.�Y�.•ts'" Tf.LEPItONT? (?Z?} S6Z-t SF)% F�x (72� 562-4865 #Error Case number: FLD2014-11027 — 401 HAMILTON CRES Owner(s): Christopher Adam Blackerby 417 N Washington Ave Clearwater, Fl 33755-4630 PNONE: 8134586919, Fax: No fax, Email: No email Applicant: Christopher Ada Blackerby 417 N Washington Ave Clearwater, FL 33755-4630 PHONE: 8134586919, Fax: No fax, Email: Chris0771980@gmail.Com Representative: Christopher Ada Blackerby 417 N Washington Ave Clearwater, FL 33755-4630 PHONE: 8134586919, Fax: No fax, Email: Chris0771980@gmail.Com Location: Atlas Page: Zoning District: 0.167 acres located on the south side of Hamilton Crescent approximately 235 feet west of South Fort Harrison Avenue. 2956 Medium Density Residential Request: Flexible Development application to permit a detached dwelling with a front (north) setback of 20 feet (to dwelling), a front (west) setback of 12 feet (to dwelling steps) and 15 feet (to dwelling) as a Residential Infill Project where standards for Residential Infill Projects are guidelines and may be varied in the Medium Density Residential (MDR) District, pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Section 2-304.G.; and an increase in the height of a wall in the front (north and west) setbacks from three to six feet pursuant to CDC Section 3-804.A.1. Proposed Use: Neighborhood Association(s): Presenter: Detached Dwelling Harbor Oaks Matthew Jackson, Planner III 11 /26/2014 1 DRC_Comments � ,o��"��:r� _ CIT� UF �LEAR�ATER ,�ti..--.� �� y� �' �� a P�a�vt�; & Df�Fa.cae�s�vr Dr:er,x��EVr ��+�6 =_ 4�' Pos�r Ot��cE Box 4'r48, C.i:��zwa�x. FcoRrr�� 33'S8-'t?�t8 ��a.:,,�' y 4 �l�ivu�c:�Pai Ssxctc:�s �3cF�cn��e,; 2�0 S�L=ra �irartc ��F�ue, C;.�,sx�ar�R, t�Lr.;etn� �3756 ''�>..�;°.:��'� Tfa.�:�rfc��v�_ C�2� 56'>��67 F.�?� ��,J,� 562-°f365 The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: Engineering Review General Note: 1) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental Review Prior to issuance of Building Permit: '!. Provide erosion contro! msasures on pl�n sheet �n� provide notes detailing erosion control methods. General Notes: 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Aapli�ati�r. 2. Offsite discharge of produced groundwater from dewatering shall comply with dewatering guidelines from Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), F.A.C. 62-621(2). 3. Additional permits from State agencies, such as the Southwest Fioricia Water Management District or Florida Department of Environmental Protection, may be required. Approval does not relieve the applicant from the requirements to obtain all other required permits and authorizations. Land Resource Review Land Resource Review: Prior to issuance af a Building Permit: 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, prior to issuance of a building permit any and all performance based erosion and sedimentation control measures must be approved by Environmental and or Stormwater Engineering, be installed properly, and inspected. 2. Please show all onsite trees on the site plan with the proposed building footprint. Also the offsite trees within 25 feet of the property line must shown as well. Any trees proposed to be removed must be shown with an X over ihem on al! demo and site plans. 3 There are two trees offsite located adjacent to the SW corner of the property. In earlier discussions with staff it was discussed that you would request a front setback reduction along Hamilton Crescent to allow more of the critical root zone to be preserved by shifting the foot print of the house. After reviewing the site plan you show shifting the front setback but have kept the side and rear setbacks at 5 feet. This is not enough space for the critical root zone of these two trees. You will either need to shift the setback or request permission to remove the Laurel Oak from the offsite neighbors yard and a root pruning and tree barricades will be required for the offsite Live Oak. 4Apply for a Tree Removal permit for the onsite #rees that will be removed because many of the trees appear to be inside the foot print of the house. 11/26/2014 2 DRC Comments �yrrzzrr Y�`'�'""' �� IT'S� C}F CLEARW�A.TER � b s,l, PL�:vviu�; & D�v�r.opa�F�rr D�eaxr+��rr ��'� =._ � PcK�r U�rc,� Bnx �?48, Ct.�n�tu:��x, FL�n¢u 33'S8-4'48 'o `�o`,�,5 0�} Nlu�ric:tpnc SEUr•icss Buicnmc, 10€l So�-cti MnzTU A«:vtr�, C[..r•.1xvEa�R, Fu>xma 33?56 +•>.�.�.r� T'ci��r�o�vF (?z� 562-� �6� F.� (?2 i' S62-4865 Planning Review Clarify the location of the masonry wall on the site plan. The wall appears to run along the entire east property line and then turns west and goes past the northwest corner of the garage. This creates a small strip of land immediately north of the driveway. The wall should terminate at the northwest corner of the garage and not extend past. Planning Review On the site plan, show the location of the A/C equipment as wetl as Code compliant screening if visible form adjacent rights of way or properties. Planning Review Reduce the width of the steps on the west facade to 42 inches o� they will need to meet the 15 foot setback. Planning Review On the site plan, provide the depth and width dimensions of both driveways. The driveways must be at least nine feet wide and 18 feet deep. Planning Review On the site pan, revise the location of the wall at the southeast corner of the property to not encroach into the adjacent property. Planning Review Label the front and side elevations with the appropriate direction such as north and west. Planning Review The side elevation appears to be the north elevation and there is an entrance shown. However, there is no walkway leading from the driveway to the entrance. If a walkway is proposed, show on the site plan and within the 20 foot setback the maximum width is 42 inches. Planning Review Prior to development order, acknowledge that the required three foot landscape buffer on the north side of the proposed wall will be planted consistent with the Landscaping standards pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202. Planning Review Prior to development order acknowledge that as per CDC Section 3-1205.D.2. a lot of this size requires four shade trees. Prior to Certificate of Occupancy four shade trees must be planted and inspected as a landscape final inspection. Shade Trees have a mature height of over 35 feet. Native trees are strongly recommended. Shade trees must be 10 feet in height and 2.5 inch caliper at time of planting. Accent trees have a mature height of over 15 feet. Native trees are strongly recommended. Two accents may be used to equal one native shade tree. Accent trees must be 8 feet in height and 2.0 inch in caliper at time of planting. Three palms may be used to equal one shade tree. Palms must have 10 feet of clear trunk at time of planting. Phoenix species (reclinata, canariensis) are considered specimen palms and are equal to one shade tree. Planning Review All Planning conditions are prior to be addressed in the CDB submittal. Stormwater Review 1.Please acknowledge and demonstrate that existing flow patterns will not be altered after construction, such as existing lot grading. 2.DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review. Additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application 11/26/2014 3 DRC Comments Traific Eng Review Prior to Community Development Board: 1. Remove the existing curb cut on the East side of Hamilton Crescent. 2. Provide driveway dimensions such as width and length and design details showing connection to the roadway. General Note(s): 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. 2. Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fse schedule and paid pr�or to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). The TIF amount for the new structure is $2,066.00. 11/26/2014 4 DRC_Comments 12/10/2014 City of Clearwater - Planning & Development FLD2014-11027 -- 401 Hamilton Crescent Resoonse to DRC Comments: Engineering Review General Note: 1) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building PermitApplication. Acknowledged. Environmental Review Prior to issuance of Building Permit: 1.Provide erosion control measures on plan sheet and provide notes detailing erosion control methods. Acknowledged General Notes: 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal ofa Building PermitApplication. 2. Offsite discharge of produced groundwater from dewatering shall comply with dewatering guidelines from Florida Departrnent of Environmental Protection, may be required (FDEP), F.A.C. 62-621(2) 3. Additional permits from State agencies, such as the Southwest Florida Water Management District or Florida Department of Environmental Protection, may be required. Approval does not relieve the applicant from the requirement to obtain all other required permits and authorization. Acknowledged. Land Resource Review Priorto issuance ofa Building Permit: 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, prior to issuance of a building permit any and all performance based erosion and sedimentation control measures must be approved by Environmental and or Stormwater Engineering, be installed properly and inspected. Acknowledged 2. Please show all onsite trees on the site plan with the proposed building footprint Also the offsite trees within 25 feet of the property line must be shown as well. Any trees proposed to be removed must be shown with an X over them on all demo and site plans. Survey now shows trees to be removed, including offsite trees. Planning Review Planning Review Planning Review Planning Review 3. There are finro trees offsite located adjacent to the SW corner of the property. ln earlier discussions with staff it was discussed that you would request a front setback reduction along Hamilton Crescent to allow more of the critical root zone to be preserved by shifting the foot print of the house. After reviewing the site plan you show shifting the front setback but have kept the side and rear setbacks at 5 feet. This is not enough space for the critical root zone of these two trees. You will either need to shift the setback or request permission to remove the Laurel Oak from the offsite neighbors yard and a root pruning and tree barricades will be required forthe offsite Live Oak. We will request permission to remove tree from offsite neighbors yard and will do root pruning and tree barricades according to a Tree Preservation Plan for offsite Live Oak. Apply for a Tree Remova! pe�m9t for the onsite tress #h�# vvill be removed because many of the trees appear to be inside the footprint of the house. Acknowledged. Clarify the location of the masonry wall on the site plan. The wall appears to run along the entire east property line and then turns west and goes pastthe northwest n _..�_ ri J :.�...�..�J:..4..I......rlh ..F+l... corner oiin� gar�g�. i iis c��aies a s�i�a�� su�N v� �ae�� u�necuia�c�y uv�u� vi u�c driveway. The wall should terminate at the northwest corner of the garage and not extend past The masonry wall now terminates at the northwest corner of the garage and does not extend past it. On the site plan, show the location of the A/C equipment as well as Code compliant screening if visible from adjacent rights of way or properties. A/C equipment now shown on site plans. lt is not visible from adjacent rights of way. On the site plan, provide the depth and width dimensions of both driveways.The driveways must be at least nine feet wide and 18 feet deep. Site plan now shows dimensions of both driveways. Both meet minimum requirements. On the site plan, revise the location of the wall at the southeast comer of the properry to not encroach into the adjacent property. Planning Review Planning Review Planning Review Planning Review Site plan now shows wall terminating at property line. Label the front and side elevations with the appropriate direction such as north and west. Front elevation now labeled "West Elevation". Side elevation now labeled "North Elevation". The side elevation appears to be the north elevation and there is an entrance shown. However, there is no walkway leading from the driveway to the entrance. If a walkway is proposed, show on the site plan and within the 20 foot setback the maximum width is 42 inches. Sidewalk added with maximum width of 42 inches. Prior to development order, acknowledge that the required three foot landscape buffer on the north side of the proposed wall will be planted consistent with the Landscaping standards pursuantto CDC Section 3-1202. Acknowledged. 3 foot landscape buffer on the north side of the proposed wall will be planted consistent with the Landscaping standards pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202 Prior to development order acknowledge that as per CDC Section 3-1205.D.2. a lot of this size requires four shade trees. Prior to Certificate of Occupancy four shade trees must be planted and inspected as a landscape final inspection. Shade Trees have a mature height of over 35 feet. Native trees are strongly recommended. Shade trees must be 10 feet in height and 2.5 inch caliper at time of planting. Accent trees have a mature height of over 15 feet Native trees are strongly recommended. Two accents may be used to equal one native shade tree. Accent trees must be 8 feet in height and 2.0 inch in caliper at time of planting. Three palms may be used to equal one shade tree. Palms must have 10 feet of clear trunk at time of planting. Phoenix species (reclinata, canariensis) are considered specimen palms and are equal to one shade tree. Acknowledged. Prior to Certificate of Occupancy four shade trees must be plarrted and inspected as a landscape final inspection. Planning Review All Planning conditions are prior to be addressed in the CDB submittal. Acknowledged. Stormwater Review 1.Please acknowledge and demonstrate that existing flow patterns will not be altered after construction, such as lot grading. Acknowleged. Existing flow patterns will not be altered after construction. Lot grading will remain the same. 2.DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review. Additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Acknowledged. Traffic Eng Review Prior to Communiry Development Board: 1.Remove the existing curb cut on the East Side of Hamilton Crescent. Existing curb cut has been removed from proposed site plan. 2.Provide driveway dimensions such as width and length and design details showing connection to the roadway. Driveway dimensions and curb cuts are now shown on proposed site plan. General Note(s): 1.DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal ofa Building PermitApplication. 2.Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of �ccupancy �C.O.). The T!F amoun: for the new structure is $2,066.00. Acknowledged. 1✓1 0 ��1�%VL`'•�r��;"r��ns'?!�S' �� °��.,��'�/�9 �J�� . � � 2149 SUGARBUSH DRIVE _ Voice (727) 847-5544 eciol Surveyor's Notes: mis Boundary Survey wos prepared without the benefit of o a report 7here still could exist other easements. rastrictions, :umbronces, etc., ihat were not presenfed this surveyor/firm an preparing fhis report 7irese porticular items may possi6/y be sent af fhe Pinellos County Courthouse. x�x� repiesent spot elewtions. This informotion is onty to >wn droinoge. Actua! Elevations were not depeicted as this area not in o Flood Zone. Certified to HRIS BLACKERBY North Rim Sanitary HOLIDAY, FLORIDA 34630 Fag (7L7) 940-7465 m � � � � Sewer Manhole i Elevafion = 30.U7• H�I��N CR�'s'Cls'NT �° '° ° p I' � � �� ' . � ��36' Righf—of—Woy � - �p�- � . _ :O . . . . . 20" Aspholt Povemerrt : . � . .��' ry .. - . � ry� . . � � .. . ' . . . . . .. . . . . _ . , s..UPng . . ... _..,_ . � � �SN&D. � � �- e � . 4' . � �= LB 6869 . �.s . I 20 < -�^ EAST � '.a �� \ . \°,�. \ 66.00" iP) (Bosis of Bearings) � � Gas pipleine . . � d de/ineator � -� �- Fire Hydmnt � �1I � �m � r j �. U °� o � � ��o � . �� t ` '�p� -.. "" �O y:�o . �� __..N. �. !'1� � � �I 2 � Concrete Walk- LOt 9` o} �� i � 26 Wote� Mete� 76.00' M) F1P 76.00� (D) ,�� p. 74' I 5� ti Plotted Lot Line�� I J I m 0 � O O � m 3 �. �,38 &32' 7' SN&D �fi� Uti7ities 8- �. '. �g �68B9 Indicoting Easement � I ..�. � � � / 5 a ,�0� � 29 �� i W ryo�� . :�:._�.�:� .a. 4 15",.,, � � �j � fI.O' � �Concrete . .� ° 4 � . � 5/ab ' 5.89'47 4714! 75.56• (M) FCIR 1/2" 6' PVC 76.00" (D) RLS �2858 Fence HARf30R OAKS Fence Line (PCA7 800K 3, PAGE 65) Fence Line 0.30' South 0.30' North Lots 7 & 9 � ^ -, � 0. E� � � � 0 vi �= Wood UtiRiy or Light Pole �f . = Water Gote VoNe FlP 1° 0 �s- I4.00" (P) 4.2�' CMI �Ot 8 SEC 1� T�.�3S RNG �E 'urveyo�s NOt25: Leeend• Legol Description provided by client. LB = Licensed Business FCl[ = Fouad Conerete Yonument . Beanngs o�e trosed on the South Ri9hf-of-Woy line of P31[ = Profesaional Surveyor and Napper C/3 = Concrete 31ab omilton Crescent. Said Line bears Eost/Wesi Assumed. �_ �S��red Iend 3urveyor C�.F = Chain Link Fence Benchmork Surve s, lnc. makes no re resentotions or �� = Found Capped Iron Rod C.H.3. = Coacrete Block Structure y p SCII2 = 3et Capped Iron Rod �'�W Ce Concrete Walk �amntees as to eosements, right-of-woys, set bock lines, g�p = Fouad Iron Pipe aservations, aqreements or ofhe� similor motters. FPP = Found Piached Pipe S/P = Scnened in Porch Per The Nationol Flood lnsurance Rafe Mop, City oi FIIt = Found Iron Rod STY = Story leorwoter, Pinellos County, Florido, Community Ponel (c) = Calculated 1[easuremeat Etea. = Residence umber 125096 0108 H, Mop Revised May 17 2005, this JP1 = P�t 1[easurement P.O.C. = Poiat of Commencement �Y1 = FYeld 1[easurement P.O.B. = Point of He�nn�ng roperty appears to be located in Flood Zone "Y". �D) = Deed Measurement CSE - Clear 3ight Easement . No underground ufilities or improvements were located DdcUE = Drainage and Utility Easement C/C/S = Covered Conerete Slab xcept os shown. FN&D = Found Nail and Disk SN&D = Set nail and disk i��ICATE NOT VALID WITHOUT TIiE SIGNATURE AND THE �i�D�Y '��Y )RIGINAL RAISED SEAL J�'' A A'I.ORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER. Le al Desc�ri. tian.� HEREBY C£RPFY THA� ?Fi15 SKETCi; OF SURVEY OF THE HER£ON OESCRBED PROP£RTY HAS 9 P EEN MADE UND£R MY DlREC7)ON, ANG TO 7HE BEST OF KNOWLEDGE AND BEUEF, 1T lS A 4UE AND ACCUR4TE RE.�RESEI�TA770N OF A SURVEY 7H4T MEE75 TNE MlNIMUM 7ECHNM.AL LOt 7, and the WBSf 10.00 feSt Of LOf 8, TANA4RD5 SET FORTH b'Y TH ftlDA BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS AS DESCRlBED pROPERTY OF J.O. HAMILTON, according to the J CHAP7ER SJ77 OF ' l A A0�4lNISTRA7IVE CODE. mop or plot thereof as recorded in Plaf Book 5, Poge 31, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florido. °` # 2014.149 DATE.• f0/02/2014 Drawn By= GT THOM4S N. GAZELL P.S.M. NO. �5387 Checked B= T SfA7E OF FLORIDA - LB. �6869 FB M Fle Crew: tg,jw FR4NT ELEVATIO _N BGALE-� if4' - T-O' West Elevation C �. C , C ; C SIDE ELEVA' BCALE� 1/4' � T-0" North Elevation � C,� � �l � � L � 5'fON� V�N�� I. �G�'f" itiX11;'�..'4'" � � �'N'.Li� �v�: � � .5:;,�C..J ~I�II�i � wir �s � , � ' . . , . � , �. � s� Ma�r•�r w� �rA-naN - w�r v�w ac� v� - ra fi � !��,t't�.`�rY l �� '�:'I�;- �J:,Cl(�.%i Ytiittii•:, Y f� f Il.k/)�� I�Y��.�'� y .�f��T%:✓ ✓�fr•!'�IV: r:l�..:JF' !�:C?�N Yv.��l,:.. 7.'�i-q ��. �� .. . , . , �. 2 s� rwa�r wn� �rA� -� viEw .GAt.6 U�' _ T^O' 6' i1nA;t;�'Y C ;(i�l:;�'E t:'. ci:.�,x; Yw�..;. �ai 511�:C!� �!Ni;�i ('fvhi':�w� ;'�:'r11?i'/+1N1":,!� i7i: !n`A,C'i%GV'vtiA1.i, i".^CY,?..=, �� ; � � �� . '�� €��