The URL can be used to link to this page

FLD2014-07020 (RELATED TO REZ2014-07002, LUP2014-07002; DVA2014-07001; ANX2014-07011)} � ��+��►�• COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD . �- -. ,-,� ,..�..,_,.. PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ' ry~ ��~ � �`°" �`�` STAFF REPORT _ _ _ �'`_.,�``�r' •�..:.�''""',_.% MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: CASE: REQUEST: GENERAL DATA: Agent... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... Applicant/ Owner ... .......... Location ... ... ... ................. Property Size ... ............ Future Land Use Plan. Zoning ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .. Special Area Plan............ Adjacent Zoning.... North South East: West.• Existing Land Use ............. Proposed Land Use... ... .. December 16, 2014 F.2. FLD2014-07020 (related to REZ2014-07002, LUP2014-07002, DVA2014-07001 and ANX2014-07011) Flexible Development application to permit a Non-residential Off-Street Parking use within the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District under the provisions of Community Development Code (CDC) Section 2- 204.C. E.D. Armstrong, III, and Katherine E. Cole; Hill Ward Henderson, P.A.; Hill Ward Henderson Law, P.A. La Salle Realty, LLC. 2222 Lake Shore Drive; southwest corner of Lake Shore Drive and 4t" Avenue South. 2.084 acres (Proposed) Residential Low (RL) (lots 10 through 14 and adjacent vacated right-of-way); (Proposed) Residential Low Medium (RLM) (lots 15 through 23 and adjacent vacated right-of-way south of Lot 15) (Proposed) Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) (lots 10 through 14 and adjacent vacated right-of-way); (Proposed) Medium Density Residential (MDR) (lots 15 through 23 and adjacent vacant right-of-way south of Lot 15) None Unincorporated Pinellas County Open Space/Recreation(OS/R) District Open Space/Recreation(OS/R) District Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District Vacant Detached Dwelling. Non-Residential Off-Street Parking ' li�l.�t 1��1�� Level II Flexible Development Application Review � ..i� � i'..i �.�iv� .. .,: . , o � ; . -.�,��v��.,. _ ... ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 2.084-acre site is located at the southwest corner of Lake Shore Drive and 4th Avenue South. The subject site is comprised of one parcel with approximately 260 feet of frontage along Lake Shore Drive and 350 feet of frontage along 4th Avenue South. The site will become part of the larger Dimmitt Automotive Group campus to the west. The site is accessed via a driveway along Lake Shore Drive at the southeast corner of the site. The immediate vicinity is characterized by a variety of residential and non-residential uses including the aforementioned Dimmitt Automotive Group. Vacated Sth Avenue South and vacant City-owned land is to the south and additional vacant City-owned land is to the east. Properties farther to the north and south are occupied by single-family residential dwellings. U.S. Highway 19 North is located farther to the west. Single family dwellings are located to the south and west of the site. Site History: The site is currently in Unincorporated Pinellas County. It is, however, the subject of several concurrent applications as follows: ➢ ANX2014-07011: request to annex the property into the City of Clearwater from Pinellas County. ➢ LUP2014-07002: request to change the Future Land Use Plan classification from Residential Suburban (RS) to Residential Low (RL) (lots 10 through 14 and adjacent vacated right-of-way) and Residential Low Medium (RLM) (lots 15 through 23 and adjacent vacated right-of-way south of Lot IS�. PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION --_� -�. 1rc�r�vnG v��CLLU�1.7. - f—IY—�h � y= fe �S �, I. Y�Y 1-_ � .,�:-- -�7yt-�lr—ti :T.S ��: �� : �� ,: I- i: �< i� r� -�: -� - — � . _ _ pOWt #i /i � � � � f.i. I.. I _ _ U �is�i_ix �s i� � � i:�x �� _ " a d�. I —I 7 � -j — � ', I �c�. �: c �.� `3 )� K �� s�e 1 +�~;—TZ22 xn �« L_ i_.!+_T- .1:.... .t. � ...:. _. N UTI L�1� FRdS'fRUCTU RE ➢ REZ2014-07002: request to provide zoning .�"-�:: designations of Low Medium DBriSlty DETACHED LLING Residential (LMDR) (lots 10 through 14 and EXISTING SURROUNDING USES MAP Community Development Board December 16, 2014 FLD2014-07020 - Page 1 � Cl�.t11 ►7{tL�l Level II Flexible Develo ment A lication Review PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT P PP DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION � �. .. �_ � t :�; � adjacent vacated right-of-way) and Medium Density Residential (MDR) (lots 15 through 23 and adjacent vacant right-of-way south of Lot 15). ➢ DVA2014-07001: first amendment to an existing Development Agreement. The amendment specifies the types of permitted uses on the site at-large, landscape buffer widths, and a prohibition of loudspeakers and the parking of service department vehicles in the proposed parking lot among other topics. A full analysis and report is included under separate cover. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no active Code Compliance cases for the subject property. Development Proposal: The proposal is to permit Non-Residential Off-Street Parking within the LMDR District. The parking lot will provide additional parking as associated with the overall Dimmitt car sales campus to the west. Access to the site will be solely from the adjacent property to the west; no access will be provided to Lake Shore Drive, 4�' Avenue South or vacated 5�' Avenue South (to the south). No signage is proposed. A retention area is proposed to the east of the proposed parking lot. Code- compliant 25 foot front setbacks or greater are provided along the north and east sides of the site. Setbacks are not required between a Non-residential Off-Street Parking use and the site which it will serve therefore, setbacks are not required, nor are proposed, along the west side of the site. A side (south) setback of 25 feet is provided. The site, as noted will include two zoning districts, LMDR and MDR and two corresponding FLUP classifications, RL and RLM, respectively. The 65-space parking lot will only be located within the LMDR zoned (RL FLUP classification) portion of the site. Special Area Plan: None Community Development Code: The proposal supports the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code as follows: Section 1-103.B.1. Allowing property owners to enhance the value of their property through innovative and creative redevelopment. The proposal will make use of an underutilized property allowing a more efficient use of the vehicle sales site to the west. Code-compliant landscaping will be provided which will effectively buffer the property from adjacent parcels. Therefore, the proposal supports this Code section. Section 1-103.B.2. Ensuring that development and redevelopment will not have a negative impact on the value of surrounding properties and wherever practicable promoting development and redevelopment which will enhance the value of surrounding properties. Surrounding properties include a secluded detached dwelling to the northeast. Otherwise properties immediately surrounding the property include a parking lot associated with the vehicles sales and display use farther to the west to which the subject will also be associated and Community Development Board December 16, 2014 FLD2014-07020 - Page 2 � Cl�t1.l TraLel Level II Flexible Develo ment A lication Review PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT p pp DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION � �, ,. vacant City-owned land to the south and east. The proposed development will be consistent the criteria for Non-residential Off-street Parking in the LMDR District as will be examined in greater detail elsewhere in this report. Therefore, the proposal supports this Code section. Section 1-103.B.3. Strengthening the city's economy and increasing its tax base as a whole. The proposal constitutes a needed parking area for an existing, long-operating successful business. As the proposal is expected to improve the existing business it is reasonable to expect the business to positively contribute to the City's tax base. Therefore, the proposal supports this Code section. Section 1-103.D. It is the further purpose of this Development Code to make the beautification of the city a matter of the highest priority and to require that existing and future uses and str^uctures in the city are attractive and well-maintained to the maximum extent permitted by law. The proposal includes a new Non-residential Off-Street Parking use in the LMDR District. The proposal with regard to site and landscape design is consistent with the requirements of the CDC and should constitute an attractive addition to the overall Dimmitt campus and the area at large. Therefore, the proposal supports this Code section. Section 2-401.1 Intent of the LMDR District and RL FL UP classification. The CDC provides that it is the intent of the LMDR District to protect and preserve the integrity and value of existing, stable residential neighborhoods of low to medium density while at the same time, allowing a careful and deliberate redevelopment and revitalization of such neighborhoods in need of revitalization or neighborhoods with unique amenities which create unique opportunities to increase property values and the overall attractiveness of the City. Furthermore, it is the intent of the LMDR District that development be consistent with the Countywide Future Land Use Plan as required by state law. The uses and development potential of a parcel of land within the LMDR District shall be determined by the standards found in this Development Code as well as the Countywide Future Land Use Designation of the property, including any acreage or floor area restrictions set forth in the Countywide Land Use Rules concerning the Administration of the Countywide Future Land Use Plan, as amended from time to time. Section 2.3.3.4.3 of the Rules provides that the purpose of the RL FLUP classifications is to depict those areas of the county that axe now developed, or appropriate to be developed, in a low density residential manner; and to recognize such areas as primarily well-suited for residential uses that are consistent with the low density, non-intensive qualities and natural resource characteristics of such areas. Permitted Primary Uses in the RL FLUP classification include Ancillary Nonresidential. Article 7 of the Rules provides that Ancillary Nonresidential includes off-street parking, drainage retention areas and open space buffer areas for adjacent, contiguous, nonresidential uses. The site will be developed with a Non-residential Off-street Parking facility for an adjacent, contiguous nonresidential use which and is permitted by the RL FLUP classification. Community Development Board December 16, 2014 FLD2014-07020 - Page 3 � C��.(�L 1'1' �1�� Level II Flexibie Development Application Review PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT a�� .'� . ..��. < ., . . . DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION Development Parameters: Impervious Surface Ratio (ISR� Pursuant to the Countywide Plan Rules and CDC Section 2-201.1, the maximum allowable ISR is 0.65. The overall proposed ISR is 0.16, which is consistent with Code provisions. Minimum Setbacks: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-204, the applicable minimum required setback for a Non-residential Off-street Parking use is 25 feet (front) and 10 feet (side). The site is a corner lot with front setbacks along the north (41h Avenue South) and east (Lake Shore Drive) and a side setback along the south. Setbacks are not required along the common property line where the Non- residential Off-street Parking use abuts the site which it will serve. The proposal include a front (north) setback of 104 feet, front (east) setback of 230 feet and a side (south) setback of 25 feet. The proposal is therefore consistent with the CDC. Mechanical Eaui ment: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-201.D.1 and 3-903.I, all outside mechanical equipment must be screened so as not to be visible from public streets and/or abutting properties. No mechanical equipment is proposed with the submittal. Si�ht Visibility Trian�les: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-904.A, to minimize hazards at any proposed driveways, no structures or landscaping may be installed which will obstruct views at a level between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade within 20-foot sight visibility triangles. No driveways from the site onto any public right-of-way are proposed. This proposal has been reviewed by the City's Traffic Engineering Department and been found to be acceptable. Utilities: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-912, for development that does not involve a subdivision, all utilities including individual distribution lines must be installed underground unless such undergrounding is not practicable. All utilities which serve the site are currently underground. Landscaping; Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.D, required perimeter buffers are based on adjacent uses and/or street types. The required landscape buffers are 10 feet. In addition, Section 3-1202.E provides that interior landscaping must be provided which is equal to or greater than 10 percent of the vehicular use area. The proposed vehicular use area is 14,338 square feet requiring 1,434 square feet of interior landscaped axea. Section 3-1202.E also provides that no more than 10 parking spaces may be in a row although up to 15 spaces in a row may be permitted. The proposal meets the requirements of Section 3-1202.E in that landscape buffers equal to or greater than 10 feet in width are proposed along the north, south and east, no more than 12 parking spaces in row are proposed and 1,531 square feet of interior landscape area is proposed. Compliance with General Applicability Standards: The proposal supports the General Applicability requirements of this Code as follows: Community Development Board December 16, 2014 FLD2014-07020 - Page 4 � C��l 1'!'fiLl.l Level II Flexible Develo ment A lication Review PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT P PP DEVELOPMENT REVffiW DIVISION L . . . e ."Re'i'S . �. .. . Section 3-914.A.1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The proposal includes a Non-residential Off-street Parking use. Properties immediately adjacent to the site are limited to vacant City-owned land and a vacated, unimproved right-of-way. Properties farther to the north and south are developed with detached dwellings. A Duke Energy power line runs east-west to the south of the site. The proposal includes CDC-compliant landscaping. The use, a parking lot, will be passive in nature and no direct access is provided to any right-of-way with access limited from the Dimmitt campus to the west. Therefore, the proposal supports this Code section. Section 3-914.A.2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The proposal should have no impact on the ability of adjacent lands to be development. The proposal is not expected to impair the value of adjacent properties. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section. Section 3-914.A.3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood. The proposal will likely have no effect, negative or otherwise, on the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section. Section 3-914.A.4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. The proposed includes no direct access to any surrounding right-of-way. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section. Section 3-914.A. S. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity. As previously discussed, the site will be adequately buffered from adjacent and surrounding uses with CDC-compliant landscaping. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section. Section 3-914.A.6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse visual and acoustic impacts on adjacent properties because the Development Agreement prohibits the use of loudspeakers or amplified sound of any kind on the property. In addition, lighting will be automatically turned off at 8:00 p.m. Monday through Friday and by 6:00 p.m. Saturday and Sunday. There should be no olfactory impacts of any kind. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section. Compliance with Non-Residential Off-street Parking Criteria Requirements: The proposal supports the specific Flexible Development criteria pursuant to CDC Section 2- 204.0 as follows: 1. The parcel proposed for development is contiguous to the parcel on which the non- residential use which will be served by the off-street parking spaces, is located and has a common boundary of at least 25 feet, or the parcel proposed for development is located immediately across a public road from the non-residential use which will be served by the Community Development Board December 16, 2014 FLD2014-07020 - Page 5 ' vil.(�tl 1TL1�L�1 Level II Flexible DevelopmentApplication Review PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT L , .. .. �:.�'.. .. : . . . DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION off-street parking spaces, provided that access to the off-street parking does not involve the use of local streets which have residential units on both sides of the street. The subject site is contiguous to the non-residential use which it will serve and does not include any direct access to any adjacent right-of-way. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section. 2. No off-street parking spaces are located in the required front setback for detached dwellings in the LMDR District or within ten feet, whicheve .r is greater, or within ten feet of a side or rear lot line, except along the common boundary of the parcel proposed for development and the parcel on which the non-residential use which will be served by the off-street parking spaces. The proposal provides setbacks 25 feet or greater along the north, south and east as required by the CDC. Setbacks are not provided where the subject site abuts the non-residential use which it will serve. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section. 3. Off-street parking spaces are screened by a wall or fence of at least three feet in height which is Zandscaped on the external side with a continuous hedge or non-deciduous vine. While a fence or wall is not shown on the site plan, the applicant has committed to providing a fence or wall around the parking lot (except for the west side of the lot where is connects to the property which it serves) three feet in height. In addition, a landscape buffer a minimum of 10 feet in width will be provided. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section. 4. All outdoor lighting is automatically switched to turn off at 9: 00 p. m. The applicant has indicated that all outdoor lighting will be automatically turned off at 8:00 p.m. Monday through Friday and by 6:00 p.m. Saturday and Sunday. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section. S. All parking spaces shall be surface parking. All parking spaces are surface parking. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section. Section 4-206.D.4: Burden of proof. The burden of proof is upon the applicant to show by substantial competent evidence that he is entitled to the approval requested. The applicant has adequately demonstrated through the submittal of substantial competent evidence that the request is entitled to the approval requested as required by CDC Section 4- 206.D.4. Community Development Board December 16, 2014 FLD2014-07020 - Page 6 � Cl�l 17L1�L�1 Level II Flexible Develo mentA lication Review PL'�vrrn�G&DEV�LOPMENT P PP DEVELOPMENTREVIEWDIVISION L . _ _� � �s��, ; : . , Compliance with Standards and Criteria: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the standards for Non-residential Off-Street Parking as per CDC Table 2-201.1 and 2-204: Standard Proposed Consistentl Inconsistent Impervious Surface Ratio 0.65 0.16 X Minimum Setbacks (feet) Front: North: 25 feet 104 feet X East: 25 feet 230 feet X Side: South: 10 feet 25 feet X West: N/A Zero feet X 1 See analysis in Staff Report Compliance with General Applicability Standards: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards for Level One and Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3-914.A: Consistent' � Inconsistent 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, X acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation imnacts on adiacent nronerties. � See analysis in Staff Report Compliance with Flexibility Criteria: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per CDC Section 2-204.0 (Non-residential Off-street Parking): Consistent' � Inconsistent The parcel proposed for development is contiguous to the parcel on which the non- X residential use which will be served by the off-street parking spaces, is located and has a common boundary of at least 25 feet, or the parcel proposed for development is located immediately across a public road from the non-residential use which will be served by the off-street parking spaces, provided that access to the off-street parking does not involve the use of local streets which have residential units on both sides of the street. 2. No off-street parking spaces are located in the required front setback for detached X dwellings in the LMDR District or within ten feet, whichever is greater, or within ten feet of a side or rear lot line, except along the common boundary of the pazcel proposed for development and the parcel on which the non-residentiai use which will be served by the off-street parking spaces. 3. Off-street parking spaces are screened by a wall or fence of at least three feet in height X which is landscaped on the external side with a continuous hedge or non-deciduous vine. Community Development Board December 16, 2014 FLD2014-07020 - Page 7 '��QLU IT(il�l Level II Flexible Development Application Review u .... �. . ��°^a<t.t �.:� � . . 4. All outdoor lighting is automatically switched to turn off at 9:00 p.m. 5. All parking spaces shall be surface parking. � See analysis in Staff Report PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION Consistent' Inconsistent X X SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meetings of August 7 and November 6, 2014 and deemed the development proposal to be legally sufficient, based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: Findings of Fact: The Planning and Development Department, having reviewed all evidence submitted by the applicant and requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact: 1. That the 2.084 acre site is located at the southeast corner of Lake Shore Drive and 4th Avenue 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. South; The subject property is comprised of one parcel with approximately 260 feet of frontage along Lake Shore Drive and 350 feet of frontage along 4th Avenue South; That the subject property is currently located within unincorporated Pinellas County within the County's Rural Residential (RR) District and Residential Suburban (RS) FLUP classification; That the property is the subject of an annexation request (ANX2014-07011); That the property is the subject of a rezoning application (REZ2014-07002) which proposes a zoning designation of LMDR and MDR Districts; That the property is the subject of a land use amendment application (LUP2014-07002) which proposes FLUP classifications of RL and RLM; That the subject property is the subject to a Development Agreement application (DVA2014- 07001); That the proposed parking facility will be located only in the portion of the site within the LMDR district and RL FLUP classification; That the subject property is not located in a special plan area; That the proposal is to construct a Non-residential Off-street Parking use within the LMDR District and is subject to the requisite development parameters per Article 2 Division 2 of the CDC; and 11. There are no active Code Compliance cases for the subject property. Conclusions of Law: The Planning and Development Department, having made the above findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the pattern of development of the surrounding neighborhood; 2. That the proposal consistent with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of the CDC; 3. That the proposal is consistent with the intent of the LMDR District and RL FLUP classification; Community Development Board December 16, 2014 FLD2014-07020 - Page 8 p p�1�ttTr� } 4� PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT � C LLil YT[LL�1 Level II Flexible DevelopmentApplication Review nEVeLOrMExT�.v�wnivisiox � � �;� .. , . . 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per CDC Table 2-204; 5. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level One and Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3-914.A; 6. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per CDC Section 2-204.C; and 7. That the applicant has adequately demonstrated, through the submittal of substantial competent evidence, that the request is entitled to the approval requested as required by CDC Section 4-206.D.4. Based upon the above, the Planning and Development Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development application to permit a Non-residential Off-Street Parking use within the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District under the provisions of Community Development Code (CDC) Section 2-204.0 subject to the following conditions: Conditions of Approval: Timing Conditions 1. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, the proposed Annexation (ANX2014- 07011), Rezoning (REZ2014-07002), Land Use Plan Amendment (LUP2014-07002) and Development Agreement (DVA2014-07001) applications be approved; 2. That prior to the issuance of any building permits a site plan which shows a fence and/or wall at least three feet in height or as otherwise permitted by the CDC around the north, south and east sides of the parking lot be submitted to and approved by Staff and that such a fence and/or wall be installed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Completion; and 3. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Completion any additional required ADA- compliant parking spaces be installed. F�"i ;'`,�=--- � Prepared by Planning and Development Department Staf£ 1�`� / l l-- .,.. _�-.--.. s Mark T. Parry, AICP, Planner III Community Development Board December 16, 2014 FLD2014-07020 - Page 9 Lookina north�vest at soulheasl corner of site. Looking west along north side of site along Lake Shore �,_:, , ;�:�{i,- �C,�, � .(�()�Iliz '.� , _ __ { ; ^ , �+�. _, '''�� ,j,�^. 'r s . - v+„c;';,^`a1:-- . • :: -, n,y„ �d�al':H's. ! s ,��'" . ,�.„ � � . . � :ti�nro - '� ti� yw w�T:, �. �. ... RGh��'keb"�v.:..�N.�i♦ .t.{.'t� .. . 1,.'y�,Ka':t�•�`��QW. r��i�;,i�� ,i,,n�� !hc nurth sidc n(>ii� -'y� +w �._.___:_.__ _ �_,��king southwest at north��ist corncr ��i >ii� �� , . �- �,OUhlll� �UUii� ��; 11UI�U1��.r�. �U(IlC! Ot Slle. 2222 Lake Shore Drive FLD2014-07020 MARK T. PARRY 1655 Linwood Drive Tel: (727) 742.2461 Clearwater, FL 33755 E-mail: mparry tampabay.rr.com SUMMARY OF QUALIFICATIONS A dedicated, AICP certified professional Planner focused on contributing to the field of Urban Planning experienced in public and private sector planning. An excellent commurncator, able to effectively interact with clients, local government officials and busmess professionals at all levels. Experienced in various aspects of urban design and planning, zoning regulations and permitting. OBJECTIVE To secure a Planning position which will allow me to continue improving the built environment and my community through sound and innovative planning and design principals. EDUCATION COOK COLLEGE, RUTGERS UNIVERSITY, New Brunswick, NJ B.S. Landscape Architecture Major, Urban Planning Certification B.S. Environmental Planning and Design Certificate Urban Planning Golden Key National Honor Society; Sigma Lambda Alpha American Planning Association (Florida Chapter); member AICP #020597 40-hour OSHA (Hazwoper) Training PLANNER I11 PLANNING DEPARTMENT, CITY OF CLEARWATER 04/12 - Present 08/98 — 04/05 • Responsible for nonresidential and single/multi-family site plan review and permitting. . Assist in the implementation and subsequent review of the Community Development Code. • Responsible for assessing and writing Community Development Code amendments. • Land Development Code development, interpretation and application. • Provide, inspect and direct landscape review/design. • Acting Development Review Manager 9/99 — 11/99 and 01/05 — 03/05. • Manage and direct Associate Planners. • Review, process and present variance/conditional use, land use/zoning atlas amendment and annexation applications at in-house and public review meetings. • Principal Planner in creating and implementing Clearwater's Downtown Design Guidelines. Assisted in the implementation and application of the Clearwater powntown Redevelopment Plan. SENIOR PLANNER DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, CARDNO TBE 04/05 — 04/12 • Planner of record for Cities of Indian Rocks Beach, Seminole and Clearwater and Town of Belleair. • Responsible for nonresidential and single/multi-family site plan review and permitting. • Perform site design and inspections. • Provide technical planning support for engineering department. • Provide support for Zoning Code, Comprehensive Plan, Zoning and Land Use Plan amendments. • Research and write Evaluation and Appraisal Reports. • Create and update Special Area Plans/Form-based Codes. . Provide CADD support. . Assist with creating redevelopment marketing material. • Perform technical environmental services including soil and groundwater sampling. Designer/Owner GREENSCAPES-GLD, MARLBORO, NJ 9/92 - 6/98 • Founded and established a local garden and landscape business. • Plan and oversee installation of commercial and residential landscaping projects utilizing a variety of CADD and photo-manipulation programs. • Develop and implement advertising programs, brochures and graphics. • Estimate, bid and negotiate jobs. • Source and negotiate purchase of materials and equipment. • Manage, train and schedule installation crews. Program Supervisor LONGSTREET FARM, MONMOUTH COUNTY PARK SYSTEM, HOLMDEL, NJ • Assisted in formulating and running children's summer program ("Hayseed"). • Created and coordinated daily programs and schedules for 6-9 year old groups. • Supervised several other programs throughout the year. • Created a demand which was finrice the program's capacity after the first year. COMPUTER SKILLS 6/87 - 8/93 Access, Microsoft Office, Microsoft Works, ClarisWorks, MS Word, Land Designer Pro, Permit Plan, Excel, Cornerstone, AutoCADD, PowerPoint, Publisher ,y CITY OF CLEARWATER Response to Comments — Lasalle Realty FLD2014-07020 -- 2222 Lake Shore Drive Enqineerinq Review General Notes: 1. Only Sheet C3 was reviewed for General Engineering criteria. The additional details provided in the plan set may have been necessary for other departmental reviews to provide flexible development approval. Construction plans shall be reviewed in more detail prior to receipt of the building permit. Response: Acknowledged. 2. Any work in the city right of way will require a city right of way use permit which is permitted through the Engineering Department. Right of way permits can be found online at http://myclearwater. com/gov/depts/pwa/engin/FormsApplications. asp Response: Acknowledged. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review. Additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. *"SEE PAGE 17 ON DOCUMENT. Response: Acknowledged. Enqineerinq Review Prior to Buildinq Construction Permit: As per Community Development Code Section 3-1908.6-Utilities-Generally, all utility facilities existing and proposed throughout the property served or to be served shall be shown on the construction improvement plans. Response: Acknowledged. No utilities will be extended and all existing utilities are shown on the plans. If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. **SEE PAGE 17 ON DOCUMENT. Response: Acknowledged. Environmental Review Prior to Buildinq Permit: Provide erosion control measures on plans and provide erosion control notes. ""SEE PAGE 17 ON DOCUMENT. Response: Acknowledged. This will be done prior to Site Permit. Land Resource Review Provide a table showing the total number of inches removed (trees rated 3 or better) and the total number of inches proposed as per the landscape plan so that the deficit can be determined. Tree inches not replaced must be paid for to the Tree Fund at a rate of $48 per inch. '`'`SEE PAGE 17 ON DOCUMENT. Response: Please see revised Landscape Plan attached. FLD2014-07020 Response to Comments Page 2 Land Resource Review Provide a Tree Preservation Plan prepared by a certified arborist. This plan must show how the proposed building, parking, Stormwater, irrigation and utilities impact the critical root zones (drip lines) of trees to be preserved and how you propose to address these impacts i.e.; crown elevating, root pruning and/or root aeration systems. Other data required on this plan must show the trees canopy line, actual tree barricade limits (2/3 of the drip line and/or in the root prune lines if required), and the tree barricade detail. And any other pertinent information relating to tree preservation. Provide prior to building permit. **SEE PAGE 18 ON DOCUMENT. Response: Please see attached Tree Preservation Plan. Land Resource Review Trees which may not be in the footprint of the parking lot, but will be severely impacted may not be able to be retained. Specifically tree 74 at the northwest corner of the parking lot appears to be roughly two feet from the parking lot. This may be too close to root prune. Many trees near the top of bank may be too close to the top of bank to root prune. This needs to be addressed in the tree preservation plan. **SEE PAGE 18 ON DOCUMENT. Response: Please see attached Tree Preservation Plan and note per discussion at DRC that tree 74 is no longer an issue due to the reduced layout of the parking lot. Land Resource Review Group of trees at the bottom left (southwest) corner near the first parking island are proposed to be retained, which would be great, except these trees are all rated 2.5 or less. Trees rated 2.5 or less should be removed and are not candidates for preservation. This site design needs to take into account and design around the trees that are rated 3 or better. **SEE PAGE 18 ON DOCUMENT. Response: Please see attached Tree Preservation and revised Landscape Plan. Land Resource Review Landscape islands with shade trees must be a minimum of 10 feet wide (from back of curb to back of curb). Revise with width of the island or change to accent trees. *'`SEE PAGE 18 ON DOCUMENT. Response: Please see attached revised Landscape Plan which proposes accent trees. Land Resource Review Some trees were downgraded due to "limited canopy", specifically some live oaks. While individually these trees may be stunted, as a grove the group of trees rated better. Clarify on the ratings of some groves of trees. *'`SEE PAGE 24 ON DOCUMENT. Response: Please see attached Tree Preservation Plan. Land Resource Review Provide a tree preservation plan. Additional comments may apply. "'`SEE PAGE 17 ON DOCUMENT. Response: Please see attached Tree Preservation Plan. FLD2014-07020 Response to Comments Page 3 Planninp Review General Site Plan and Application Comments 1. Page 2 of 8 Application: The County has the property listed as having 2.137 acres where the application lists 2.084 acres. Please clarify and correct as appropriate. Response: 2.084 acres is the accurate and verified acreage of the property using ACAD. The acreage on the survey is also 2.084 acres MOL. 2. Page 3 of 8 Application: Please provide the estimated value of the project. Response: $250,000.00 3. Clarify if a unity of title will be done between this and the adjacent property to the west. Response: No unity of title if necessary, as the First Amendment to Development Agreement joins the subject property and the existing dealership property to the west. General Applicability Criteria Comments 4. General Applicability Criteria 1 through 5- No comments. Response: Acknowledged. 5. General Applicability Criterion 6- Please provide any details with regard to loudspeakers and/or lighting i.e. will there be lighting and/or loudspeakers? Response: As agreed to in the Development Agreement and First Amendment, the use of loudspeakers or amplified sound will be prohibited. The lighting will be on an automatic timer and set to turn off at 8:00 p.m. on Monday-Friday and at 6:00 p.m. on Saturday and Sunday. Flexible Development Criteria Comments Specific Use Criteria 1- 2- No comments. Response: Acknowledged. Specific Use Criterion 3- Fencing is generally limited to three feet in height in the LMDR District (where the parking lot will be located) (exceptions can be made within the MDR District). Let's keep the fence height to three feet and please provide details about the fence such as material and color. Response: As discussed at DRC, no fence is proposed around the parking lot or site perimeter, since the MDR portion is to remain in its natural forested state. The perimeter of the proposed parking lot will be screened by a landscape buffer consisting of hedges. Specific Use Criterion 4- Please clarify at what time outdoor lighting will be automatically switched off (and it needs to be no later than 9:00 p.m.). Response: The lighting will be on an automatic timer and set to turn off at 8:00 p.m. on Monday-Friday and at 6:00 p.m. on Saturday and Sunday. n 0 FLD2014-07020 Response to Comments Page 4 9. Specific Use Criterion 5- No comments. Response: Acknowledged. Disclaimer 10. Please note that additional comments may be generated at or subsequent to the DRC meeting based on responses to DRC comments. Please carefully review the listed request. It is ultimately the responsibly of the applicant to ensure that the request reflects what is wanted. In order to be reviewed by the CDB on December 16, 2014 15 sets (revised as needed) must be submitted no later than noon November 14, 2104. Response: Acknowledged. Stormwater Review Prior to Buildinq Permit 1. Please provide detail and cross section of pond. Response: To be provided prior to Site Permit. 2. Please provide stormwater drainage calculations showing site has sufficient capacity. Please use rational method. Response: To be provided prior to Site Permit. 3. Provide separate paving, grading, and drainage plans that include all stormwater details. Response: To be provided prior to Site Permit. 4. Finished work at the existing driveway and any areas within the City's r-o-w shall not result in ponding issues. Temporary flooding of the restored area within the r-o-w may be needed for thorough inspection. Response: Acknowledged. 5. Please show proposed pipe inverts on plans. Response: These details will be added prior to Site Permit. 6. Drainage Connection permit/easement will be required to connect into Alligator Creek Channel B. Response: Acknowledged. 7. Provide stormwater sheet flow direction for entire storm system on Master Paving, Grading, and Drainage Plan. Response: These details will be provided prior to Site Permit. General Comments 1. Please cloud any/all changes on the plans before returning them for re-review. Response: Acknowledged. There were no substantive changes to the plans for CDB review. FLD2014-07020 Response to Comments Page 5 2. All resubmittals shall be accompanied with a response letter addressing how each department condition has been met. Response: Acknowledged. 3. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit ""SEE PAGE 32 ON DOCUMENT. Response: Acknowledged. Stormwater Review General Notes: Only Sheet C3 was reviewed for General Engineering criteria. The additional details provided in the plan set may have been necessary for other departmental reviews to provide flexible development approval. Construction plans shall be reviewed in more detail prior to receipt of the building permit. Response: Acknowledged. Any work in the city right of way will require a city right of way use permit which is permitted through the Engineering Department. Right of way permits can be found online at http://myclearwater.com/qov/depts/pwa/enq i n/FormsApplications. asp Response: Acknowledged. 3. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review. Additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. *"SEE PAGE 17 ON DOCUMENT. Response: Acknowledged. Traffic Review Prior to CDB: Provide required number of accessible parking spaces compliant with 2012 Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction. **SEE PAGE 16 ON DOCUMENT. Response: As discussed at DRC, this parking lot does not need ADA spaces since it will not be used by customers or the general public. ADA compliant spaces are provided on the dealership lot near US 19. Traffic Review General Note: 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. **SEE PAGE 17 ON DOCUMENT. Response: Acknowledged. Unknown Review General Notes: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Response: Acknowledged. Offsite discharge of produced groundwater from dewatering shall comply with dewatering guidelines from Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), F.A.C. 62-621(2). FLD2014-07020 Response to Comments Page 6 Response: Acknowledged. 3. Additional permits from State agencies, such as the Southwest Florida Water Management District or Florida Department of Environmental Protection, may be required. Approval does not relieve the applicant from the requirements to obtain all other required permits and authorizations. **SEE PAGE 1 ON DOCUMENT. Response: Acknowledged. Unknown Review Prior to issuance of Buildinq Permit: An Asbestos Survey is usually required prior to conducting any demolitions or renovations. Contact Pinellas County Air Quality (727/464-4422) for more information. ""SEE PAGE 17 ON DOCUMENT. Response: Acknowledged. Unknown Review Prior to issuance of Building Permit: 1. Provide location of erosion control measures on plans sheet and provide notes detailing erosion control methods. **SEE PAGE 18 ON DOCUMENT. Response: To be provided prior to permitting. °: � rwater ��e� U Planning & Development Department Flexible Development Application Attached Dwellings, Mixed-Uses or Non-Residential Uses IT IS INCUMBENT UPON THE APPLICANT TO SUBMIT COMPLETE AND CORRECT INFORMATION. ANY MISLEADING, DECEPTIVE, INCOMPLETE OR INCORRECT INFORMATION MAY INVALIDATE YOUR APPLICATION. ALL APPLICATIONS ARE TO BE FILLED OUT COMPLETELY AND CORRECTLY, AND SUBMITTED IN PERSON (NO FAX OR DELIVERIES) TO THE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY NOON ON THE SCHEDULED DEADLINE DATE. A TOTAL OF 11 COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS AND APPLICATION MATERIALS (1 ORIGINAL AND 10 COPIES) AS REQUIRED WITHIN ARE TO BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW BY THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE. SUBSEQUENT SUBMITTAL FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD WILL REQUIRE 15 COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS AND APPLICATION MATERIALS (1 ORIGINAL AND 14 COPIES). PLANS AND APPLICATIONS ARE REQUIRED TO BE COLLATED, STAPLED AND FOLDED INTO SETS. THE APPLICANT, BY FILING THIS APPLICATION, AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE. FIRE DEPT PRELIMARY SITE PLAN REVIEW FEE: $200 APPLICATION FEE: $1,205 PROPERTY OWNER (PER DEED): La Salle Realty, LLC MAILING ADDRESS: 25191 US Highway 19 North, Clearwater, FL 33763 PHONE NUMBER: See Authorized Agent EMAIL: AGENT OR REPRESENTATIVE: E.D. Armstrong III and Katherine E. Cole, Esq., c/o Hill Ward Henderson, P.A. MAILING ADDRE55: 311 Park Place Blvd., Suite 240, Clearwater, FL 33759-4904 PHONE NUMBER: �72�) �24-3900 EMAIL: ed.armstrong@hwhlaw.com and katie.cole@hwhlaw.com ADDRE55 OF SUBIECT PROPER7Y: 2222 Lake Shore Drive, Clearwater, FL 33759 PARCEL NUMBER(5): 32/28/16/14940/035/0100 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See attached Exhibit A PROPOSED USE(S): Non-residential off-street parking fa DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: See attached Exhibit B Specifically identify the request (include all requested code flexibility; e.g., reduction in required number of parking spaces, height, setbacks, lot size, lot width, specific use, etc.J: Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 1 of 8 Revised 01/12 0 0 ° l��rwater �� U Planning & Development Department Flexible Development Application Data Sheet PLEASE ENSURE THAT THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS FILLED OUT, IN ITS ENTIRETY. FAILURE TO COMPLETE THIS FORM WILL RESULT IN YOUR APPLICATION BEING FOUND INCOMPLETE AND POSSIBLY DEFERRED UNTIL THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION CYCLE. Present: RR (Pinellas County) & OS/R (City) Requested: LMDR - Lots 10-14 and adjacent vacated right of way (ROW); ZONING DISTRICT: MDR - Lots 15-23 and adjacent vacated ROW south of Lot 15 Present: RS (Pinellas County); Requested: RL - Lots 10-14 and adjacent FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATION: vacated ROW; RLM - Lots 15-23 and adjacent vacated ROW south of Lot 15 EXISTING USE (currently existing on site): Vacant/Garage PROPOSED USE (new use, if any; plus existing, if to remain): Non-residential off-street parking facility with 65 spaces SITE AREA: +�-90,766 sq. ft. +�-2.084 acres GROSS FLOOR AREA (total square footage of all buildings): Existing: 2,769 sq. ft. Proposed: N/A sq. ft. Maximum Allowable: 36,306.4 - 45,383 sq. ft. GROSS FLOOR AREA (total square footage devoted to each use, if there will be multipie uses): First use: N�A sq. ft. Second use: N/A sq. ft. Third use: N/A sq. ft. FLOOR AREA RATIO (total square footage of all buildings divided by the total square footage of entire site): Existing: 0.03 Proposed: N/A Maximum Allowable: 0.40-0.50 BUILDING COVERAGE/FOOTPRINT (1�` floor square footage of all buildings): Existing: 2,769 sq. ft. ( 3 % of site) Proposed: N/A sq. ft. ( % of site) Maximum Permitted: N/A sq. ft. ( % of site) GREEN SPACE WITHIN VEHICULAR USE AREA (green space within the parking lot and interior of site; not perimeter buffer): Existing: N/A sq. ft. ( N�A % of site) Proposed: 1,531 sq. ft. ( 10.67 % of site) VEHICULAR USE AREA (parking spaces, drive aisles, loading area): Existing: 3 spaces/8,518 sq. ft. ( 9 38 Proposed: 65 spaces/14,338 sq. ft. ( 16 % of site) % of site) Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 2 of 8 Revised 01/12 IMPERVIf3U$ SUR�ACE IiE171C} (total square footage of impervic�us areas d'rvided hy the total square �ootage of entire site}: Existingj �-'�� Pro posed : 0: 9 6 IUlaximum Permi#ied; �•65-0 75 DENSITY {units, rooms or beds per acre): Existi�ng: VacantiGarage Propnsed; N/A Nlaximum Perrnitted: 5-14 d.u. per acre OFF-STREE? P�1RKlN�_ Existing: 3 spaees Props�sed: Up to 65 spaces ivllnimum Required: NIA Bl31LQING NEIGMT; Existing: VacanUnne Story Garage Proposed: N!A Maximum Permitted: 3€} fe�;t WHAT 15 THf £STIMATEb 707'RL VALUE UF TFRE P�tC3JECT UPQN COMPEETIQN? $ 250 OC��.00 ZfaP11NG C7iSi'RICT5 �C?R ALL 11D1RCENT PRQPERTY: Narrh: RR (CcsuntY) SQUtih: OSIR E�st: (�S/R West: LMDi2 57ATE t3F FL{?ftiaA� Cq!UNTY tlF PINECi.AS I, the undersigned, ackno�,Wie€ige thaL all Sworn to and sukascribed before me th`�s �� day oE tepr�serrt�tians r�ade dn this applicaticrn are� true ar�d � � s. accurate to tlie 6est of rny knowledg� and authorize ��t� ��- Y� __�� °`- '"_. to me and/or by City representatives to visit and photagraph the K�therine �. Col�, Esq. _, who is personaliy known has property described in this application. -----��"`�`�°`"" "`� t�rt�t#Grced as identification. r Signa�ure of property awnerb'r represent�tive Katherine E Coie, Esq., Auihorized Ager�t �e . Notary pu�iic, My cr�mmission expires, EXPlR�S: NaVember ti, 2057 Forxled i6ru P�dotary Fubl� Urdenritan Planning 8 DevEfaprriertt Departmenf,100 S. MyrUe Avenue, Glearv�ater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-A85b Page 3 of $ Revtsed OAI12 o � � Planning & Development Department ��e Flexible Develo ment A lication p pp � Site Plan Submittal Package Check list IN ADDITION TO THE COMPLETED FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT (FLD) APPLICATION, ALL FLD APPLICATIONS SHALL INCLUDE A SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL PACKAGE THAT INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION AND/OR PLANS: � Responses to the flexibility criteria for the specific use(s) being requested as set forth in the Zoning District(s) in which the subject property is located. The attached Flexible Development Application Flexibility Criteria sheet shall be used to provide these responses. � Responses to the General Applicability criteria set forth in Section 3-914.A. The attached Flexible Development Application General Applicability Criteria sheet shall be used to provide these responses. � A signed and sealed survey of the property prepared by a registered land surveyor including the location of the property, dimensions, acreage, location of all current structures/improvements, location of all public and private easements including official records book and page numbers and street right(s)-of-way within and adjacent to the site. L� If the application would result in the removal or relocation of mobile home owners residing in a mobile home park as provided in F.S. § 723.083, the application must provide that information required by Section 4-202.A.5. � If this application is being submitted for the purpose of a boatlift, catwalk, davit, dock, marina, pier, seawall or other similar marine structure, then the application must provide detailed plans and specifications prepared by a Florida professional engineer, bearing the seal and signature of the engineer, except signed and sealed plans shall not be required for the repair or replacement of decking, stringers, railing, lower landings, tie piles, or the patching or reinforcing of existing piling on private and commercial docks. � A site plan prepared by a professional architect, engineer or landscape architect drawn to a minimum scale of one inch equals 50 feet on a sheet size not to exceed 24 inches by 36 inches that includes the following information: � Index sheet of the same size shall be included with individual sheet numbers referenced thereon. � North arrow, scale, location map and date prepared. � Identification of the boundaries of phases, if development is proposed to be constructed in phases. � Location of the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL), whether the property is located within a Special Flood Hazard Area, and the Base Flood Elevation (BFE) of the property, as applicable. � Location, footprint and size of all existing and proposed buildings and structures on the site. � Location and dimensions of vehicular and pedestrian circulation systems, both on-site and off-site, with proposed points of access. � Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks, curbs, water lines, sanitary sewer lines, storm drains, fire hydrants and seawalls and any proposed utility easements. � Location of onsite and offsite stormwater management facilities as well as a narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including calculations. Additional data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual may be required at time of building construction permit. � Location of solid waste collection facilities, required screening and provisions for accessibility for collection. � Location of off-street loading area, if required by Section 3-1406. � All adjacent right(s)-of-way, with indication of centerline and width, paved width, existing median cuts and intersections and bus shelters. � Dimensions of existing and proposed lot lines, streets, drives, building lines, setbacks, structural overhangs and building separations. � Building or structure elevation drawings that depict the proposed building height and building materials. Planning 8 Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 4 of 8 Revised 01/12 � Typical floor plans, including floor plans for each floor of any parking garage. � Demolition plan. LXJ Identification and description of watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, specimen trees, and other environmentally sensitive areas. � If a deviation from the parking standards is requested that is greater than 50% (excluding those standards where the difference between the top and bottom of the range is one parking space), then a parking demand study will need to be provided. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved. Please see the adopted Parking Demand Study Guidelines for further information. � A tree survey showing the location, DBH and species of all existing trees with a DBH of four inches or more, and identifying those trees proposed to be removed, if any. � A tree inventory, prepared by a certified arborist, of all trees four inches DBH or more that reflects the size, canopy, and condition of such trees may be required if deemed applicable by staff. Check with staff. ❑ A Traffic Impact Study shall be required for all proposed developments if the total generated net new trips meet one or more of the following conditions: N/A ■ Proposal is expected to generate 100 or more new trips in any given hour (directional trips, inbound or outbound on the abutting streets) and/or 1,000 or more new trips per day; or ■ Anticipated new trip generation degrades the level of service as adopted in the City's Comprehensive Plan to unacceptable levels; or ■ The study area contains a segment of roadway and/or intersection with five reportable accidents within a prior twelve month period, or the segment and/or intersection exists on the City's annual list of most hazardous locations, provided by the City of Clearwater Police Department; or • The Traffic Operations Manager or their designee deems it necessary to require such assessment in the plan review process. Examples include developments that are expected to negatively impact a constrained roadway or developments with unknown trip generation and/or other unknown factors. � A landscape plan shall be provided for any project where there is a new use or a change of use; or an existing use is improved or remodeled in a value of 25% or more of the valuation of the principal structure as reflected on the property appraiser's current records, or if an amendment is required to an existing approved site plan; or a parking lot requires additional landscaping pursuant to the provisions of Article 3, Division 14. The landscape plan shall include the following information, if not otherwise required in conjunction with the application for development approval: � Location, size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names. � Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and location, including drip line. � Interior landscape areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressed both in square feet, exclusive of perimeter landscaped strips, and as a percentage of the paved area coverage of the parking lot and vehicular use areas. � Location of existing and proposed structures and improvements, including but not limited to sidewalks, walls, fences, pools, patios, dumpster pads, pad mounted transformers, fire hydrants, overhead obstructions, curbs, water lines, sanitary sewer lines, storm drains, seawalls, utility easements, treatment of all ground surfaces, and any other features that may influence the proposed landscape. � Location of parking areas and other vehicular use areas, including parking spaces, circulation aisles, interior landscape islands and curbing. � Drainage and retention areas, including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations. � Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscaped buffers including sight triangles, if any. Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 5 of 8 Revised 01/12 °1 r � � ��rwate U Planning & Development Department Flexible Development Application General Applicability Criteria PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO EACH OF THE SIX (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA EXPLAINING HOW, IN DETAIL, THE CRITERION IS BEING COMPLIED WITH PER THIS DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL. 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. See attached Exhibit B for Responses 1 through 6. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 6 of 8 Revised 01/12 ° i _ rw r � � �� ate � Planning & Development Department Flexible Development Application Flexibilitv Criteria PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO THE APPLICABLE FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR THE SPECIFIC USE(5) BEING REQUESTED AS SET FORTH IN THE ZONING DISTRICT(S) IN WHICH THE SUBIECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED. EXPLAIN HOW, IN DETAIL, EACH CRITERION IS BEING COMPLIED WITH PER THIS DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL (USE SEPARATE SHEETS AS NECESSARY). g, See attached Exhibit B for Responses 1 through 8. � 3. 5. 8. Planning 8� Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 7 of 8 Revised 01/12 ° �l��ate� Planning & Development Departpr►ent F�exible Deve�opment Application ° Affidavit to Au�orize Agent/Representative 1. Provide names of alf property owners on deed — PRINT fulf names: La Salle Reatty, ��C 2. That (i am/we are} the owner{sj and record titte holder(s} af the follawing described property: 32128l1 E1149AO1D35J0100 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request far (describe requestj: Flexible Developrnent 4. That the undersigned (F�as�ha�e} appointed and jdoes/do} appoint: E.D. Armstrang lli and Katherine E. Coie, Esq. as (his/theirj agent(s) to execute any petitions or other dacuments necessary to affect such petition; 5. ihat this affidavit has 6een exeeuted ta induce the Gity of Clearwater, Florida to consEder and act on the above described proper[y; 6. Tha# site visits to the p►aperry are necessary by City representa#ives in order to proeess this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photogragh the praperty described in this apptication; 7. Ti�at [I/we), the undersigned auYhority, hereby certify that the faregtiing is frue and correct. La Sa�le sa4ty, C Prape y Owner Property C}wner By: Richard R. L7immitt, Manager Praperty Dwner STATE OF FL�RIBA, CdUl1iTY OF PINELLAS Property Owner BEFORE ME T}iE UNDERSIGNED, AN OFFICER DiJLY CdMMIS5IQNED BY TFiE LAWS 4F TtiE STATE QF FLflRIDA, �N TFiIS � �` DAY OF �u ►t q. , .�I � , PERSQNALLY APPEAR�O Richard R. [}immitt, as Manager for La S�IIe Realty, LLC WHp HAVING BEEl� �IRSF QULY SWORN DEPQSEfl AND SAYS TNAT�SHE FULLY UNDERSiA�fDS THE CONTEN'fS OF iHE AFFIDAVIi THA HFJ HE S]GNEQ. ��.AYP� QYvi�ll�n�v1 * * �rcc�wi$Sia�:t��aat9 DIPI�ES: Ocld�et 18, 2411 �3ra�d� Boa�led7ku01dpdfJde�ySm'bBi Notary Seal/Stamp ar , � tary u lic Signature My Commissibn �xpires: � o� I b( l7 Pianning & Qevelopment Department, 'E�b 5. Myrile Avenue, Clsanxater, Ft 33756, T2t: 727-5fi2�1b67; Fax: 727-562-d855 Page $ a# 8 ReviSOtf a1I12 Exhibit A Lots 10 through 23, inclusive, Block 35, Unit #3, Section "A", of CHAUTAUQUA ON THE LAKE, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 146, together with that portion of the North 30 feet of Fifth Avenue South (60 foot right of way, vacated per O.R. Book 8041, Pages 65-70) lying south of a��d adjacent to Lots 10 through 15, inclusive, Block 35, Unit #3, Section "A", of CHAUTAUQUA ON THE LAKE, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 146, all ofthe Public Records ofPinellas County, Florida. 5562470v1 City of Clearwater Flexible Development Application FLD2014-07020 2222 LAKE SHORE DRNE, CLEARWATER EXHIBIT "B" Description of Request The property currently contains a one story garage with an existing driveway accessing Lake Shore Drive. The Applicant requests Flexible Development (FLD) Site Plan Approval to demolish the existing building and close the access at Lake Shore Drive to allow a non-residential off-street parking facility with cross access from the existing adjacent parking lot to the west. The subject property is +/-2.084 acres (90,766 square feet) and is bounded by the Applicant's parking lot and car dealership to the west, recreation/open space to the south and east, and single family residences to the north across Fourth Avenue South. Specifically, the Applicant requests FLD Site Plan Approval in the LMDR and MDR Districts to permit demolition of the one story garage and construction of a non-residential off-street parking facility to serve the adjacent car dealership, more particularly described as follows: a. Lot Area of 2.084 (MOL) acres (90,766 square feet) - minimum lot area not applicable to proposed use or zoning districts; b. Lot Width — minimum lot width not applicable to proposed use or zoning districts; c. Maximum Building Height (above BFE) — Not applicable; maximum height not applicable to proposed use; d. Flexibility to the minimum standards for the Side (West) Setback abutting Applicant's existing parking lot: 0 feet, where 10 feet is required; e. Front (South) Setback: 25 feet, where 25 feet is required; f. Front (North) Setback: 104 feet, where 25 feet is required; g. Front (East) Setback: 230.1 feet, where 25 feet is required; h. Providing up to 65 Parking Spaces (65 spaces/0 SF), where 0 spaces are required); as a Flexible Development Project, under the provisions of Sections 2-204.0 and 2-304.D of the Development Code with a ten-year development arder. General Applicability Criteria l. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The specific request is in harmony with the approved scale, bulk, coverage, density or character of the adjacent development. This request is to demolish an existing garage, and construct a parking lot to support the car dealership to the west. The adjacent properties are of varying scale, bulk, coverage and density. The surrounding area consists of a residential neighborhood to the north, recreation and open space owned by the City of Clearwater to the east and south (Lake Chautauqua), Duke Energy transportation/utility area to the south, and the Applicant's parking lot and car dealership to the west. The proposed re- development plan is within the allowable limits of the flexible standards of the Development Code for flexible development projects. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. This proposed parking lot will not discourage appropriate development and use of the adjacent land and buildings, because it will be significantly buffered with internal cross access, which ensures the value of adjacent and surrounding properties will not be compromised. Rather, it fulfills the long range plan for this area of the City. The proposed parking lot further enhances this area of the City in a number of ways, including: 1. The included generous setbacks and 25' landscape buffer on the southern boundary enhance the view from the residential area to the north and preservation area to the south and east. 2. Preservation of the MDR lots surrounding the parking lot in their existing state for future residential use fulfills the long term vision of the City. 3. The proposed site plan utilizes internal cross access, which keeps dealership traffic off local roads, and promotes the safety of residents and pedestrians. 4. Providing adequate parking for the dealership enhances the view of the dealership from US Highway 19 and reduces the number of vehicles in the adjacent parking lots. 2 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The demolition of the existing structure and construction of the proposed parking lot will not impact health and safety of persons nearby and the redevelopment of the site will comply, as required, with all applicable codes including the Florida Building Code, the Life Safety Code and the Florida Fire Prevention Code. This FLD application is accompanied by the First Amendment to Development Agreement, which modifies an existing developnlent agreement which encumbers the balance of the car dealership property and requires significant landscape buffers adjacent to the residential uses. A 25 ft. landscape buffer will apply along the southern boundary of this additional property as well, which will also be incorporated into the modified development agreement. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. Constructing the parking lot does not negatively impact traffic, as the parking area will include cross access from the adjacent parking lot and serve to operate as a common parking area serving the car dealership. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The proposed parking lot together with the southern landscape buffer, significant setbacks and internal cross access ensures consistency with the community character of the immediate vicinity co�nprised of homes and preservation area. The design of the proposed parking lot is consistent with the surrounding and nearby uses and the character of the community, providing an appropriately scaled development for this area of the City. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. The proposed use and site plan minimizes any adverse effects on adjacent properties by situating the parking lot at the southwest corner of the property opposite the retention area, and closing access to local roads. Specifically, the parking lot utilizes only 16% of the total site, and will be 104 feet from the residential area to the north, 230 feet from Lake Chautauqua to the east, and bordered on the south by a 25 foot landscape buffer. The proposed hours of operation will be similar to the adjacent dealership. Noise associated with specific hours of operation for these areas will be established in the First Amendment to Development Agreement, submitted concurrently with this application. Dimmitt is a locally managed and operated organization that prides itself on service and comfort of its guests, which will translate into being an excellent neighbor. 3 FLEx�sLE DEVELOrMENT CR�TER�A - Non-residential off-street parking. 1. The parcel proposed for development is contiguous to the parcel on which the non-residential use which will be served by the off-street parking spaces, is located and has a common boundary of at least 25 feet, or the parcel proposed for development is located immediately across a public road from the non-residential use which will be served by the off-street parking spaces, provided that access to the off-street parking does not involve the use of local streets which have residential units on both sides of the street. The proposed parking lot is contiguous to the parcel on which the non-residential use which will be served by the off-street parking spaces, and access to the off- street parking does not involve use of local streets. No off-street parking spaces are located in the required front setback for detached dwellings in the LMDR or MDR Districts or within ten feet, whichever is greater, or within ten feet of a side or rear lot line, except along the common boundary of the parcel proposed for development and the parcel on which the non-residential use which will be served by the off-street parking spaces. Off-street parking spaces are not located in the required 25 foot front setback for detached dwellings in the LMDR and MDR districts, except within the side/west setback where the common boundary of the parcel proposed for development and the parking on which the existing dealership/non-residential use will be served. The First Amendment to Development Agreement sets a 25 foot buffer along the south, which is adjacent to preservation area and assures its continuity. Off-street parking spaces are screened by a wall or fence of at least three [four feet in MDR District] feet in height which is landscaped on the external side with a continuous hedge or non-deciduous vine. As agreed to at DRC, all parking spaces will be screened by a continuous landscape buffer consisting of hedges. Also, there will be a continuous 25 foot landscape buffer on the southern boundary. 4. All outdoor lighting is automatically switched to turn off at 9:00 p.m. The proposed hours of operation and lighting will be similar to the adjacent dealership. Lighting will be set to switch off on an automatic timer and shall be designed and directed toward the parking lot only. 5. All parking spaces shall be surface parking. All proposed parking spaces are surface parking spaces. 4 6o6�s9z�� a� R+DBER50N RESOURCE �ROUP . Landscape Architecfiure & Consulting � Memora,ndu.m To: Robert Pergolizzi, AICP, PTP From: Patrick Roberson, RLA, ISA Date: 06/30/ 14 Re: Dimmitt Parking Expansion. — Existing Tree Invento�y A site visit was conducted on June 18, 2014 to review the highly visible, general conditions of the existing h•ees at the Dimmitt Parking Expansion site, in Clearwater, Florida. The existing trees were reviewed and rated utilizing the required criteria of the City of Clearwater's rating system. This system rates the trees on a scale from 1 to 6, with 1 being dead or in decline and 6 being a specimen tree in excellent condition. This review was conducted by Patrick Roberson of Roberson Resource Group, LLC who is an ISA Certified Arborist (�' PL-1 O51A) and Florida Registered Landscape Architect (#LAOOOl461). In general, there were 221 trees on site that were reviewed. The site was mostly open space with a single house type structure in the near middle of the site with an associated access driveway. Most of the trees were Live Oaks (Quercus virginiana) and Slash Pine (Pinus elliottii) with a few Queen Palms (Syagrus romanzoffiana), Cherry Laurels (Prunus caroliniana), Camphor Trees (Cinnamomum camphor) Water Oaks (Quercus nigra), Law�el Oaks (Quercus laurifolia), Magnolias (Magnolia grandiflora), Sand Pines (Pinus clausa), Longleaf Pine (Pinus palustris), a Red Maple (Acer rubrum) and a Podocarpus (Podocarpus macrophyllus). A few exotic species were also found on site that included Australian Pine (Casuarina equisetifolia) and Ear Trees (Enterolobium cyclocarpum). The Oak trees tended to be of average to good condition with some issues related to structure, limited canopy, some dead wood / branch tip dieback or trunk lean. The Slash Pine tended to be of good to average condition with a few trees with limited canopies, major overall dieback or limited canopy / upper structure. The trees along the northern area of the western side of the site had overhead utility lines that were coming into limited contact with the tree canopies. The trees were mainly in the open green space of the site with a few trees adjacent to the main structure. The site's green space has been and is maintained as a lawn. Some of the Cherry Laurels and Camphor Trees were in poor condition with structural issues and signs of rot. The Red Maple had included trunks, rot and other structural issues and was poor condition. The Queen Palms tended to be in good condition and have straight trunks with good canopies. Attached is the summary of the existing tree ratings and site plan with the location and number reference of each tree. A full size (22"x34") plan of the Existing Tree Inventory with the summary will also be provided as part of the drawings provided as part of the Landscape and Irrigation Plan submittal. Please let me know if you have any questions or need any additional inf'ormation. 315� Little Rd., #125, Trinity, Florida 3�F655 Phone: 727-255-4258 Web: RRGLA.cam Florida License No. - �.C26QOp2b7 Dimmitt Parking Expansion Site Visit: June 18, zo�4 Existing Tree Inventory Summary By: PdtriCk Roberson, RLA, ISA- Roberson ReSOUrCe Group, LLC Tree # Common Name Botanical Name Tree General Comments Rating 1 Camphor Cinnamomum camphora 3 Some structural issues, some rot / deadwood 2 Red Maple Acer rubrum 2 Included trunks, rot, structural issues 3 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 3 Some deadwood, rot, minor fungi, full canopy 4 Australian Pine Casuarina equisetifolia 1 Exotic 5 Australian Pine Casuarina equisetifolia 1 Exotic 6 Australian Pine Casuarina equisetifolia 1 Exotic 7 Australian Pine Casuarina equisetifolia 1 Exotic 8 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 2.5 Deadwood, limited canopy 9 Queen Palm Syagrus romanzoffiana 3.5 10 Queen Palm Syagrus romanzoffiana 4 11 Queen Palm Syagrus romanzoffiana 3.5 12 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 2.5 Limited canopy 13 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 3.5 14 Queen Palm Syagrus romanzoffiana 4 15 Queen Palm Syagrus romanzoffiana 4 16 Queen Palm Syagrus romanzoffiana 4 17 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 2 Structural issues, limited canopy 18 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 2 Structural issues, limited canopy 19 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 2 Structural issues, limited canopy 20 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 2 Structural issues, limited canopy 21 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 2 Structural issues, limited canopy, deadwood, fungi in upper canopy 22 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 2 Structural issues, limited canopy 23 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 2 Structural issues, limited canopy 24 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 2 Structural issues, limited canopy 25 Longleaf Pine Pinus palustris 2 Structural issues in upper trunk, deadwood 26 Queen Palm Syagrus romanzoffiana 3 27 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 2 28 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 2 29 Longleaf Pine Pinus palustris 3 Some structural issues 30 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 1 Dead 31 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 2 Structural issues, deadwood 32 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 2 Structural issues, deadwood 33 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 3 34 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 3 35 Longleaf Pine Pinus palustris 3 36 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 3 37 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 3 38 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 3 39 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 3 40 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 3 41 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 2 Structural issues, deadwood 42 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 2 Structural issues, deadwood 43 Camphor Cinnamomum camphora 2 Structural issues, deadwood, rot 44 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 1 Dead 45 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 1 Dead 46 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 2 Limited canopy, structural issues 47 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 2.5 Structural issues, lean, limited canopy 48 Live Oak quercus virginiana 2.5 Structural issues, lean, limited canopy 49 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 2.5 Structural issues, lean, limited canopy 50 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 2.5 Structural issues, lean, limited canopy 51 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 2.5 Structural issues, lean, limited canopy 52 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 2.5 Structural issues, lean, limited canopy 53 Live Oak Quercus vlrginiana 2.5 Structural issues, lean, limited canopy 54 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 2.5 Structural issues, lean, limited canopy 55 Magnolia Magnolia grandiflora 3.5 56 Live Oak quercus virginiana 2 Structural issues 57 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 2 Structural issues Page 1 of 4 58 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 2.5 Structural issues 59 Laurel Oak quercus laurifolia 1 Dead 60 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 2 Deadwood into main trunk 61 Water Oak Quercus nigra 3 62 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 2.5 Structural issues upper trunk 63 Live Oak quercus virginiana 2 Dead main branch into main trunk, possible decline 64 Water Oak Quercus nigra 3 65 Sand Pine Pinus clausa 2 Species issues with wind, impacts of canopy 66 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 2.5 Structural issues, lean 67 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 2 Decline, rot, limited canopy 68 Live Oak quercus virginiana 3 69 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 3 70 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 2 Structural issues 71 Water Oak Quercus nigra 2 Structural issues 72 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 2.5 Structural issues 73 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 3 74 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 3 75 Sand Pine Pinus clausa 2.5 Species issues with wind 76 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 3 77 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 2 Very limited canopy 78 Cherry Laurel Prunus caroliniana 3 79 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 2 Structural issues 80 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 2.5 Structural issues 81 Laurel Oak quercus laurifolia 2 Structural issues 82 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 2 Structural issues, lean 83 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 2 Structural issues, major lean, rot, uplifting of roots 84 Laurel Oak quercus laurifolia 2 Structural issues, epicormic growth, deadwood 85 Laurel Oak quercus laurifolia 2 Structural issues 86 Laurel Oak Cluercus laurifolia 2 Structural issues 87 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 2 Structural issues 88 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 2 Structural issues 89 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 2.5 Structural issues 90 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 3 91 Palmetto Large shrub - not a tree 92 Palmetto Large shrub - not a tree 93 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 1 Dead 94 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 3 95 Live Oak quercus virginiana 1 Dead / decline 96 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 3 97 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 2 Structural issues, limited canopy 98 Water Oak quercus nigra 2 Structural issues, very limited canopy 99 Water Oak Quercus nigra 3 100 Water Oak quercus nigra 2 Structural issues, deadwood, fungi 101 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 3 102 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 3 103 Ear Tree Enterolobium cyclocarpum 2 Exotic 104 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 2 Limited canopy 105 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 3 106 Water Oak quercus nigra 2 Included bark at trunk base 107 Water Oak Quercus nigra 2.5 Structural issues 108 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 1 Decline 109 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 2 Structural issues 110 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 2 Structural issues 111 Ear Tree Enterolobium cyclocarpum 2 Exotic 112 Water Oak Quercus nigra 3 113 Water Oak Quercus nigra 2 Structural issues, deadwood 114 Water Oak Quercus nigra 3 115 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 2.5 Structural issues 116 Water Oak Quercus nigra 3 117 Water Oak Quercus nigra 3 118 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 3 119 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 2 Structural issues, limited canopy 120 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 2 Structural issues, limited canopy 121 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 3 Page 2 of 4 122 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 2 Structural issues, limited canopy 123 Water Oak Quercus nigra 3 124 Water Oak Quercus nigra 3 125 Water Oak Quercus nigra 2 Structural issues, limited canopy 126 Water Oak Quercus nigra 2 Structural issues, deadwood upper canopy 127 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 3 128 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 3 129 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 2 Deadwood, trunk bark issues, structural issues 130 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 2 Structural issues 131 Magnolia Magnolia grandiflora 3 132 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 2 Structural issues 133 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 2 Structural issues 134 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 2 Structural issues 135 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 2 Structural issues 136 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 2 Structural issues 137 Laurel Oak quercus laurifolia 2 Structural issues 138 Water Oak Quercus nigra 2 Structural issues 139 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 1 Decline, rot, deadwood, structural issues 140 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 3 141 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 2 Decline, rot, deadwood, structural issues 142 Podocarpus Podocarpus macrophyllus 3 143 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 3 144 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 3 145 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 3 146 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 3 147 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 3 148 Queen Palm Syagrus romanzoffiana 2.5 Limited canopy due to adjacent tree 149 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 3 150 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 3 151 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 3 152 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 3 153 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 3 154 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 3 155 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 3 156 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 3 157 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 3 158 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 3 159 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 3 160 Water Oak quercus nigra 3 161 Magnolia Magnolia grandiflora 3 162 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 3 163 Cherry Laurel Prunus caroliniana 2 Structural issues 164 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 3 165 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 3 166 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 3 167 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 3 168 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 3 169 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 1 Dead 170 Camphor Cinnamomum camphora 3 171 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 3 172 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 3 173 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 3 174 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 3 175 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 3 176 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 1 Dead 177 Water Oak Quercus nigra 3 178 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 3 179 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 3 180 Cherry Laurel Prunus caroliniana 2 Structural issues 181 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 3 182 Camphor Cinnamomum camphora 2 Structural issues 183 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 3 184 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 3 185 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 3 Page 3 of 4 186 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 3 187 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 3 188 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 3 189 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 3 190 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 3 191 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 3 192 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 3 193 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 3 194 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 3 195 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 3 196 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 3 197 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 3 198 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 1 Dead 199 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 3 200 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 3 201 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 3 202 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 3 203 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 3 204 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 3 205 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 3 206 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 2 Structural issues 207 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 3 208 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 3 209 Magnolia Magnolia grandiflora 3 210 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 1 Dead 211 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 1 Dead 212 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 3 213 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 3 214 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 3 215 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 2 Structural issues 216 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 2 Structural issues 217 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 3 218 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 1 Dead 219 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 2 Structural issues 220 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 3 221 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 1 Dead Page 4 of 4