The URL can be used to link to this page

FLD2014-070220 � 1 r��t�� _�ea u � ;�.� MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: CASE: REQUEST: GENERAL DATA: Agent... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .. Applicant / Owner... ... ... ... Location ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .... Property Size... ... ... ... ... ..... Future Land Use Plan... COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT October 21, 2014 E.1. FLD2014-07022 Flexible Development application to permit a multi-use dock consisting of six separate docks totaling 4,844 square feet in area (approximately 810 square feet each) with each dock up to 111 feet in length and 40 feet in width, side (east and west) setbacks of 95 feet (to dock) and 80 feet (to tie poles) under the provisions of CDC Section 3-601.C.3. Terri Skapik, Woods Consulting. Brightwater Blue Resort, LLC. 150 Brightwater Drive; north side of Brightwater Drive approximately 725 feet east of Hamden Drive 2.082 acres Resort Facilities High (RFH) Zoning ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .... Tourist (T) District Special Area Plan ............... Beach by Design (Small Motel District) Adjacent Zoning.... North: Preservation (P) South: Tourist (T) District East: Tourist (T) District West.• Tourist (T) District Existing Land Use ............... Vacant (Approved for Attached Dwellings) Proposed Land Use... ... ..... Attached Dwellings (30 units) with accessory multi-use docks. � li�l.�l �1'�Ll.l Level II Flexible Development Application Review � \.l'�\J\ ��.�wJ.�..,� . . ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The largely vacant 2.082-acre site is located on the north side of Brightwater Drive approximately 725 feet east of Hamden Drive. The subject property is comprised of eight parcels with a combined frontage of approximately 730 feet along Brightwater Drive and 780 feet of frontage along the water. The site is vacant except for a small dock and some incomplete foundation work on the eastern- most side of the site. The subject property is zoned Tourist (T) District with an underlying Future Land Use Plan (FLUP) category of Resort Facilities High (RFH). The subject property is also located within the Small Motel District of Beach by Design. The immediate vicinity is characterized primarily by attached dwellings between two and five stories as well as a few modest motels up to two stories in height. Site History: In 2014, the site was the subject of a Level One Flexible Standard Development application (FLS2014-04007) which requested approval to permit 30 resort attached dwelling units in six three-story buildings and six, five-slip docks (30 slips total). That case was approved by the Community Development Coordinator on June 10, 2014 with seven conditions. A permit (BCP2014-07069) for site work associated with this site plan has been submitted and is under review by the City. The site has been the subject of several past Flexible Development approvals including FLD2003-12069, FLD2005-09101, FLD2005- 11109 and FLD2010-06004. Each of these approvals has expired. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no active Code Compliance cases for the subject property. PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION . , , �� PROJECT f` � � SITE N.T.S �:�N �. ` _ �' ; � J �� k �%k > � � _.._._�. _.__,._ .. � .. ,a�-.. F�F rN s r - _. �.� `i , �\ �s � ' i� !-y~� �'Y9o�C �''�- � 1 '�. � . �` �; � \ , � �� `� - :,,�. - = ,' �«��_. ;1 „�,, .. LOCA710N MAP — -, � ` !�, � �---�r—� r°-� /,�� 6,r'.� J L.� � �t � ' � F � A i TACHE D N.T.�. DWELLIIIGS � � _ � � ATTACHE� DWEIINIGS r -� r -i r" 1' _+ r-� -� 'J ` � J {.�°� �/ �.. � J L: �� ! � ^ � � x "� !i��?+��'wi � ~ ° ' OETACMED w BAYYIDE DR Di�LLI�IiiS � : � : ��:°� "� "F'� °�.: � r `_ -ti EXISTING SURROUNDING USES MAP P F' � , � N.T.S `.: -; .> �:4r�S1R�r3W;4:,;�,«��e� _ �,� 8RICNTWATlA�DR +r�i�i�i��i�ii��;i:+�' . z . -. 's • . ... A. . :a. p� ` ` ,�: . > .,, �. ��j� D BAYSIOi OR i�n ' � � • ..\ y th:, ZONING MAP Community Development Board — October 21, 2014 FLD2014-07022— Page 1 � �lq} PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT : C��1 ►'tLiLe� Level II Flexible Development Application Review navECOr�rrr xEV�w nrvisiox ' �,�rb.;;, Development Proposal: The proposal includes a reconfiguration of the dock layout as approved as part of FLS2014- 04007. The proposal includes six docks with a total area of 4,844 square feet (approximately 800 square feet each). Each dock will include five slips for a total of 30 slips (one per resort attached dwelling unit). Docks A through D and dock F are identical in dimensions and are each 802 square feet, 103 feet in length and 40 feet in width. Dock E is a little longer (111 feet total) to avoid seagrass and encompasses slightly more area (834 square feet). As explored in greater detail further in this report, the proposed dock is consistent with all dimensional standards of the Community Development Code (CDC) including permitted length, width and setbacks. The only reason that it must be reviewed by the Community Development Board (CDB) is because the area of the docks exceeds 500 square feet. The dock will be for the sole use of residents of the property and their guests and will not be rented or leased to non-residents. There will be no fueling, pump out services, boat repairs or public use permitted. Handrails and signage are proposed to prohibit mooring except in designated slips. Fire protection, potable water and electricity will be provided. Special Area Plan: Beach by Design: Small Motel District The City has demonstrated through the creation of Beach by Design and subsequent amendments to this plan that it recognizes the need for pedestrian-friendly development in order to create a vibrant active resort and waterfront destination serving tourists and locals alike. It is understood that a broad range of uses including retail sales and service, hotels and motels and restaurants contribute to the creation of the unique character and atmosphere that is Clearwater Beach. The vision of the Small Motel District of Beach by Design recognizes that this district is an area of small motels, many of which have established clientele. The document acknowledges that although existing improvements may not represent the theoretical "highest and best" use of this area, the relatively good condition of most buildings and the economic value of the existing improvements make it difficult, if not impossible, to anticipate significant land assembly, demolition and new development. Beach by Design calls for the redevelopment of Brightwater with land uses and building mass which are compatible with the residential cul-de-sacs to the north and south. Mid-rise townhouses and timeshares between two and four stories above parking are contemplated. The approved plan for this site includes townhomes two stories above parking. The current proposal provides additional dock facilities as accessory to the approved residential use. This proposal would further the trend of quality redevelopment and/or improvements of properties along Brightwater Drive within the District. Comprehensive Plan: The proposal is supported by various Goals, Objectives and/or Policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan as follows: Future Land Use Plan Element Objective A. S.5 - Promote high quality design standards that support Clearwater's image and contribute to its identity. The proposal includes the construction of a multi-use dock providing 30 slips which will serve as an accessory use to an approved 30-unit resort attached dwelling use. The majority of the surrounding properties also feature a variety of dock structures as consistent with the sizes of the Community Development Board — October 21, 2014 FLD2014-07022— Page 2 '_ C��(�l ��l�t Level II Flexible Develo ment A lication Review FLANNING & DEVELOPMENT p pp DEVELOPMENTREVIBWDIVISION " ��;��, : � properties and frontages along the waterway. The subject property is significantly larger than most of the surrounding parcels which provides the opportunity for the size and scale of the proposed docks. The proposal will meet all of the required bulk and dimensional specifications for a multi-use dock as detailed within the CDC. The proposal will enhance the existing waterfront use and is supported by this Objective. Policy A. S. S.1 Development should be designed to maintain and support the existing or envisioned character of the neighborhood. As mentioned above, the proposal is consistent with other docks in the area with regard to the size and configuration of the subject property, complies with all requirements of the CDC and is consistent with this Policy. Community Development Code: Purpose, Intent and Basic Planning Objectives The proposal supports by the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code as follows: Section 1-103.B.1. Allowin� propertv owners to enhance the value o their propertv through innovative and creative redevelopment. The property owner seeks to provide a typical amenity of waterfront dwellings; docks. The proposal will provide each resort attached dwelling unit with one slip. The docks have been designed to avoid seagrass and provide adequate water depth for resident's boats. Therefore, the proposal supports this Code section. Section 1-103. B. 2. Ensurin� that development and redevelopment will not have a negative impact on the value of surrounding properties and wherever practicable promoting development and redevelopment which will enhance the value ofsurroundin,�properties. Surrounding properties have been developed with overnight accommodations or attached dwellings most of which include docks. In fact, many of the immediately surrounding properties have been redeveloped in the last five to 10 years. The proposed docks are setback approximately 100 feet from either extended property line. The proposal should not hinder the redevelopment of adjacent properties nor adversely affect their value. Therefore, the proposal supports this Code section. Section 1-103.B.3. StrengtheninQ the citv's economv and increasin�its tax base as a whole. The proposal includes accessory docks to serve a proposed 30-unit resort attached dwelling use. The proposal is expected to enhance the value of the overall project thereby positively contributing to the City's economy and its t� base. Therefore, the proposal supports this Code section. Section 1-103. D. It is the urther purpose of this Development Code to make the beautification o�' the city a matter o the highest prioritv and to rec�uire that existin� and future uses and structures in the citv are attractive and well-maintained to the maximum extent permitted bv law. The proposal includes six new docks which will serve as an accessory feature for a proposed resort attached dwelling development. The docks are designed to avoid seagrass and provide adequate depth to prevent prop dredging. Therefore, the proposal supports this Code section. Community Development Board — October 21, 2014 FLD2014-07022— Page 3 } C�QaI 1'lrale� Level II Flexible Develo ment A lication Review PLANNING& DEVELOPMENT P PP DEVELOPMENT REV�W DIVISION " ��a� . �: a �; � Section 1-103. E. S. Preserve the natural resources and aesthetic character of the communit�e or both the resident and tourist population consistent with the citv's economic underpinnings. As mentioned, the proposal preserves seagrass and should prevent or limit incidents of prop dredging. The proposal will support the proposed 30-unit resort attached dwelling development. Therefore, the proposal supports this Code section. Section 2-801.1 Intent ofthe T District and RFHFLUP classi ication. The CDC provides that the intent of the T District is to protect and preserve the integrity and value of existing, stable residential neighborhoods of inedium high density while at the same time, allowing a careful and deliberate redevelopment and revitalization of such neighborhoods in need of revitalization or neighborhoods with unique amenities which create unique opportunities to increase property values and the overall attractiveness of the City. Development is to be consistent with the Countywide Future Land Use Plan as required by state law. Section 2.3.3.4.6 of the Countywide Land Use Rules provides that the purpose of the RFH FLUP classification is to depict those areas of the County that are now developed, or appropriate to be developed, in a highly intensive residential manner; and to recognize such areas as primarily well-suited for residential uses that are consistent with the urban and intensive qualities, transportation facilities and natural resource characteristics of such areas. The proposal includes an accessory use to an approved 30-unit resort attached dwelling as permitted by the RFH FLUP classification. The surrounding area has been developed in accordance with the intensity of use permitted by the underlying FLUP classification of RFH. Development Parameters: Docks: CDC Section 3-601.C.3 provides development criteria and standards for commercial docks (the definition of which includes multi-use docks exceeding 500 square feet in area). The proposal includes the removal of one small dock which is in poor condition and the construction of six new docks each approximately 800 square feet in area, 110 feet in length and 40 feet in width with side (east and west) setbacks of 95 feet (to dock) and 80 feet (to tie poles). The docks will be for the sole use of residents of the property and their guests with no portion rented or leased to non-residents. The dimensional standards criteria set forth in CDC Section 3-601.C.3.h differentiate between commercial/multi-use docks adjacent to single- and two-family dwellings, such docks located on non-residentially zoning property adjacent to residentially zoned property and all other circumstances. The proposed dock is on non-residentially zoned property adjacent to multi- family residential dwellings containing more than two dwelling units. As such, the required side setback shall be 10 percent of the width of the waterfront property line. The width of the waterfront property line on the subject property is 780 feet; therefore the proposed dock must be set back from the east and west extended property lines 78 feet. The proposed dock will be a minimum of 95 feet from either extended side property line. Community Development Board — October 21, 2014 FLD2014-07022— Page 4 � C��ftl 1'ta641 Level II Flexible Devel ment lication Review PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT � �P DEVELOPMENTREVIEWDIVISION . , ��.:, .r . . . With regard to length, commercial docks shall not extend from the mean high water line or seawall of the subject property more than 75 percent of the width of the subject property as measured along the waterfront property line up to 250 feet; thus the length of the dock is limited to 585 feet. As proposed, the longest dock (dock E) has a length of 111 feet with the remaining docks 103 feet. The width of a dock is limited to 75 percent of the width of the property along the water. Therefore the width of the proposed dock should not exceed 585 feet. The total proposed width of each dock is 40 feet. Therefore the dimensional parameters of docks axe consistent with the Code and no deviations from the dimensional standards of the CDC are requested. The development proposal has been found to be consistent with the criteria for commercial docks pursuant to CDC Section 3-601.C.3.a-g. Specific responses to each of these criteria have been provided by the applicant and are included with their application. Generally, the proposed docks are intended to serve as an accessory use to the attached dwellings proposed for the site. The size, scale and scope of the proposed dock are consistent with other docks in the area considering the size of the site, provided setback and density proposed. The width of the waterway to the north is approximately 485 feet. The proposed docks will occupy about 23 percent of the waterway. Given the length of the proposed dock and the nearest dock to the north there will be approximately 300 feet of navigable waterway available. The applicant has asserted that the proposal will have no impact on existing water recreation activities or on navigation. The applicant has also asserted that the proposal will also have no negative impacts on the marine environment or on water quality or natural resources. Please note that the Harbor Master has reviewed the submittal and has found the proposal to be acceptable. It should also be noted that dock permits are ultimately issued by Pinellas County Water and Navigation. General Applicability Criteria Requirements: The proposal supports of the General Applicability requirements of this Code as follows: Section 3-914.A.1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The proposed docks are in scale with the other docks in the area given the width and overall size of the site. A residential development immediately to the east of the subject site includes a dock approximately 150 feet in length. The residential development immediately to the west includes docks approximately 60 feet in length. The proposed docks will be between 103 and 111 feet in length. Given the nearly 100 foot side setbacks, the overall size of the site and the need to avoid seagrass beds the proposed docks are in harmony with the character of adjacent properties. Therefore, the proposal supports this Code section. Section 3-914.A.2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The proposal is generally consistent with the character of adjacent properties with regard to scale and scope and should enhance that value of the approved resort attached dwelling development. Many properties along Brightwater Drive have been redeveloped in the last ten years or so with attached and resort attached dwellings including accessory docks. The proposal will have no impact on the ability of adjacent properties to be redeveloped. It is not expected that the proposal will significantly impair the value of adjacent land and buildings. Therefore, the proposal supports this Code section. Community Development Board — October 2l , 2014 FLD2014-07022— Page 5 ° Clearwater Level II Flexible Development Application Review L . . �%�'i?l`.. . . . PLANNING 8c DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION Section 3-914.A.3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood. The proposal will include six new docks as accessory to an approved residential development. There will be no fueling, pump out services, boat repairs or public use permitted. Handrails and signage are proposed to prohibit mooring except in designated slips. Fire protection, potable water and electricity will be provided. The proposal will likely have no effect on the health and/or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section. Section 3-914.A.4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. The proposal will likely have minimal effect, negative or otherwise, on traffic congestion. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section. Section 3-914.A. S. The proposed development is consistent with the communiry character of the immediate vicinity. As noted, most of the properties along Brightwater Drive have been developed with residential or overnight accommodation uses and include accessory docks. The proposed docks, designed to avoid seagrass and prevent prop dredging, is similar in scale and scope to other development in the area given the size of the site. Therefore, the proposal supports this Code section. Section 3-914.A.6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. The design of the proposed development should not result in any adverse olfactory, visual and acoustic impacts on adjacent properties. There will be no fueling, pump out services, boat repairs or public use permitted. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section. Section 4-206.D.4: Burden of proof. The burden of proof is upon the applicant substantial competent evidence that he is entitled to the approval requested. The applicant has adequately demonstrated through the submittal of substantial evidence that the request is entitled to the approval requested as required by CDC 206.D.4. to show by competent Section 4- Compliance with Standards and Criteria: The following table depicts the development proposals consistency with the standards and criteria as per CDC Section 3-601.C.3.h: Standard Proposed Consistentt Inconsistent Dock Setbacks 10% of the width of the subject West: 95 feet (to dock) X (Minimum) property (78 feet) 80 feet (to tie pole) 10% of the width of the subject East: 95 feet (to dock) X property (78 feet) 80 feet (to tie pole) Dock Length 75% of the width of the subject 103 - 111 feet X (Maximum) property (585 feet) Dock Width 75% of the width of the subject 40 feet (each dock) X (Maximum) property (585 feet) ' See analysis in Staff Report Community Development Board — October 21, 2014 FLD2014-07022— Page 6 � Cl��l ►7aL�1 Level II Flexible Develo ment A lication Review PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT p pp DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION �s�b , Compliance with General Applicability Standards: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards for Level One and Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3-914.A: Consistent' Inconsistent 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, X density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. T'he proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate X viciniTy. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, X acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adiacent nroperties. I See analysis in Sta,�'Report Compliance with Flexibility Criteria: The individual criteria for commercial docks pursuant to Section 3-601.C.3.a-g (and multi-use docks which shall be reviewed as commercial docks based on proposed square footage in excess of 500 square feet) are set forth in the following table: Consistent1 Inconsistent a. Use and compatibiliry. X i) The proposed dock shall be subordinate to and contribute to the comfort, convenience or necessities of the users or the occupants of the principal use of the property. ii) The proposed dock shall be in harmony with the scale and character of adjacent properties and the neighborhood in general. iii) The proposed dock shall be compatible with dock patterns in the general vicinity. b. Impacts on existing water recreation activities. The proposed dock/tie poles or use X thereof, shall not adversely impact the health, safety or well being of persons currently using the adjacent waterways for recreational and/or commercial uses. Furthermore, the dock shall not preclude the existing uses of the adjacent waterway. Such uses include but are not limited to non-motorized boats and motorized boats. c. Impacts on navigation. The existence and use of the proposed dock shall not have a X detrimental effect on the use of adjacent waters for navigation, transportation, recreational or other public conveniences. d. Impacts on marine environment. }{ i) Docks shall be sited to ensure that boat access routes avoid injury to mazine grassbeds or other aquatic resources in the surrounding areas. ii)Docks shall not have an adverse impact upon natural marine habitats, grass flats suitable as nursery feeding grounds for marine life, or established marine soil suitable for producing plant growth of a type useful as nursery or feeding grounds for marine life; manatee sanctuaries; natural reefs and any such artificial reef which has developed an associated flora and fauna which have been determined to be approaching a typical natural assemblage structure in both density and diversity; oyster beds; clam beds; known sea turtle nesting site; commercial or sport fisheries or shell fisheries areas; and habitats desirable as juvenile fish habitat. Community Development Board — October 21, 2014 FLD2014-07022— Page 7 ' 1��1.�� 1'� [iLL.� Levei II Flexible Development Application Review . . .�'�? . `.. .. . e. Impacts on water quality. i) All tuming basin, access channels, boat mooring areas and any other area associated with a dock shall have adequate circulation and existing water depths to ensure that a minimum of a one foot clearance is provided between the lowest member of a vessel (e.g. skegs, rudder, prop) and the bottom of the waterbody at mean or ordinary low water (-0.95 NGVD datum). ii) The dock shall not effectively cause erosion, extraordinary storm drainage, shoaling of channels, or adversely affect the water quality presently existing in the area or limit progress that is being made toward improvement of water quality in the area in which the dock is proposed to be located. f. Impacts on natural resources. i) The dock shall not have a material adverse impact upon the conservation of wildlife, marine life, and other natural resources, including beaches and shores, so as to be contrary to the public interest. ii) The dock shall not have an adverse impact on vegetated areas; vegetative, terrestrial, or aquatic habitats critical to the support of listed species providing one or more of the requirements to sustain their existence, such as range, nesting or feeding gounds; habitats which display biological or physical attributes which would serve to make them rare within the confines of the city; designated preservation areas such as those identified in the comprehensive land use plan, national wildlife refuges, Florida outstanding waters or other designated preservation areas, and bird sanctuaries. g. Impacts on wetlands habitat/uplands. The dock shall not have a material adverse affect upon the uplands surrounding. I See analysis provided by the app[rcant in the application submittal SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION Consistent1 Inconsistent X X X The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meeting of September 4, 2014, and deemed the development proposal to be legally sufficient, based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: Findings of Fact: The Planning and Development Department, having reviewed all evidence submitted by the applicant and requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact: 1. The 2.082-acre subject property consists of eight parcels with a combined frontage of approximately 725 feet along Brightwater Drive and 780 feet of frontage along the water and is located on the north side of Brightwater Drive approximately 725 feet east of Hamden Drive; 2. That the site is the subject of an approved Level One Flexible Standard Development application (FLS2014-04007); 3. That the subject property is located within the Tourist (T) District and the Resort Facilities High (RFH) Future Land Use Plan category; 4. That the subject property is located within the Small Motel District of Beach by Design; 5. That the proposal includes a multi-use dock consisting of six separate docks with a total of 30 slips totaling 4,844 square feet in area with each dock up to 111 feet in length and 40 feet in width, side (east and west) setbacks of 95 feet (to dock) and 80 feet (to tie poles) under the provisions of CDC Section 3-601.C.3; 6. That the proposal will serve as an accessory use to an approved but as yet un-built 30-unit resort attached dwelling development; and 7. That there is no active Code Compliance case for the subject property. Community Development Board — October 21, 2014 FLD2014-07022— Page 8 Y C�l.�l 1`�N�ll.l Level II Flexibie DevelopmentApplication Review FLANNING&DEVELOPMENT � . .. .;�� ,.... ..r.. , .� ..... �. . DEVELOPMENT REVIF.W DIVISION Conclusions of Law: The Planning and Development Department, having made the above findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law: 1. That the development is consistent with applicable portions of the City's Comprehensive Plan; 2. That the development is consistent with the General Purposes of the CDC pursuant to CDC Section 1-103; 3. That the development is consistent with the standards for pocks pursuant to CDC Section 3- 601; 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level One and Two Approvals pursuant to CDC Section 3-914.A; and 5. That the application is consistent with the requirement for the submittal of substantial competent evidence pursuant to CDC Section 4-206.D.4. Based upon the above, the Development Review Committee recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development application to permit a multi-use dock consisting of six separate docks totaling 4,844 square feet in area (approximately 810 square feet each) with each dock up to 111 feet in length and 40 feet in width, side (east and west) setbacks of 95 feet (to dock) and 80 feet (to tie poles) under the provisions of CDC Section 3-601.C.3, subject to the following conditions: Conditions of Approval: GeneraUMiscellaneous Conditions 1. That boats moored at any existing or proposed docks, lifts and/or slips be for the exclusive use by the residents and/or guests of the attached dwellings and not be permitted to be sub- leased separately from the resort attached dwelling; 2. That fueling, pump out services, boat repairs or public use be prohibited; 3. That handrails and signage are installed to prohibit mooring except in designated slips; and, Timin� Conditions - prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy 4. That a copy of a deed restriction which prohibits use of the docks and slips except for residents and their guests and that evidence of filing of such a deed restriction be submitted to Staff. ,� � ; _____.��___._---� �r„' Prepared by Planning and Development Department Staff: �' Mark T. Parry, AI��', Planner III Community Development Board — October 21, 2014 FLD2014-07022— Page 9 �� . r'n4w •� • . ,'y — r�t� ' � v�7' .: ) � gt ��-Y " s;'M�t � h ' � • �?`�., , '�ii�`i��1^ ' .'. ; a ; .�%^ � � � 4.� �;�.i; .:� .. .. � � ... .. . h'xisting dock at norlhcast corncr u� ;itc. �; �.: . - _ . �� _ - _ ., .�. . ..� t.,. Dock on adjacent property to the west. , :�i�hin� �r�.i niui��_ :,, il, �.i.l� �� . ,1[� � �,,i`i�.:: L N,� t f~ ��` '�, ��.��ul�I ,� �- __�..� � �,lll" ilalf ��,r,€, - -� . � � _ � � � ��.fi.� 4;�� i��_ � �. �.. dv �.... c_"..` •y�r `. . M �. ' �� .. . ' . y1�N � �-ur7K!l. ., �, . J.. Looking northwest al ,uu�hcast curncr ot� �itr � p "�� r�'. z ^se�, sa 9j �� k �k�� a�r�� ` �. R �.�+' _ � �f*ti`' x �:}� � �'�xT '; '� �„�_;,+.�. ^q�'."�,?^..t.:';: Dock on adjacent property to the ea�i �� <, � �; � � � � � � � `� ` ��< .€ u'°�, � �`T �, `�� }� �a ='� ��"�;� r'• I ��,��kinz e��l 1i��in �rn�rr nt�,�tr 150 Brightwater Drive FLD2014-07022 MARK T. PARRY 1655 Linwood Drive Tel: (727) 742.2461 Clearwater, FL 33755 E-mail: mparry@tampabay.rr.com SUMMARY OF QUALIFICATIONS A dedicated, AICP certified professional Planner focused on contributing to the field of Urban Planning experienced in public and private sector planning. An excellent communicator, able to effectively interact with clients, local government officials and business professionals at all levels. Experienced in various aspects of urban design and planning, zoning regulations and permitting. OBJECTIVE To secure a Planning position which will allow me to continue improving the built environment and my community through sound and innovative planning and design principals. EDUCATION COOK COLLEGE, RUTGERS UNIVERSITY, New Brunswick, NJ B.S. Landscape Architecture Major, Urban Planning Certification B.S. Environmental Planning and Design Certificate Urban Planning Golden Key National Honor Society; Sigma Lambda Alpha American Planning Association (Florida Chapter); member AICP #020597 40-hour OSHA (Hazwoper) Training PLANNER III PLANNING DEPARTMENT, CITY OF CLEARWATER 04/12 - Present 08/98 — 04/05 • Responsible for nonresidential and single/multi-family site plan review and permitting. • Assist in the implementation and subsequent review of the Community Development Code. • Responsible for assessing and writing Community Development Code amendments. • Land Development Code development, interpretation and application. • Provide, inspect and direct landscape review/design. . Acting Development Review Manager 9/99 —11/99 and 01/05 — 03/05. • Manage and direct Associate Planners. • Review, process and present variance/conditional use, land use/zoning atlas amendment and annexation applications at in-house and public review meetings. • Principal Planner in creating and implementing Clearwater's Downtown Design Guidelines. Assisted in the implementation and application of the Clearwater powntown Redevelopment Plan. SENIOR PLANNER DEVELOPMENT 8� ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, CARDNO TBE 04/05 — 04/12 • Planner of record for Cities of Indian Rocks Beach, Seminole and Clearwater and Town of Belleair. . Responsible for nonresidential and single/multi-family site plan review and permitting. • Perform site design and inspections. • Provide technical planning support for engineering department. • Provide support for Zoning Code, Comprehensive Plan, Zoning and Land Use Plan amendments. • Research and write Evaluation and Appraisal Reports. • Create and update Special Area Plans/Form-based Codes. . Provide CADD support. • Assist with creating redevelopment marketing material. • Pertorm technical environmental services including soil and groundwater sampling. Designer/Owner GREENSCAPES-GLD, MARLBORO, NJ 9/92 - 6/98 • Founded and established a local garden and landscape business. • Plan and oversee installation of commercial and residential landscaping projects utilizing a variety of CADD and photo-manipulation programs. • Develop and implement advertising programs, brochures and graphics. • Estimate, bid and negotiate jobs. • Source and negotiate purchase of materials and equipment. • Manage, train and schedule installation crews. Program Supervisor LONGSTREET FARM, MONMOUTH COUNTY PARK SYSTEM, HOLMDEL, NJ • Assisted in formulating and running children's summer program ("Hayseed"). • Created and coordinated daily programs and schedules for 6-9 year old groups. • Supervised several other programs throughout the year. • Created a demand which was finrice the program's capacity after the first year. COMPUTER SKILLS 6/87 - 8/93 Access, Microsoft Office, Microsoft Works, ClarisWorks, MS Word, Land Designer Pro, Permit Plan, Excel, Cornerstone, AutoCADD, PowerPoint, Publisher ° l�ar�water � V U Planning & DeveIopment Department Flexible Development Application Attached Dwellings, Mixed-Uses or Non-Residential Uses IT IS INCUMBENT UPON THE APPLICANT TO SUBMtT COMPLETE AND CORRECT INFORMATION. ANY MISI.EADING, DECEPTiVE, INCOMPLETE OR INCORRECT INFORMATION MAY INVALIDATE YOUR APPUCATION. ALL APPUCATIONS. ARE TO BE FILLED OUT CQMPLETEIY AND CORRECTLY, AND SUBMI7TED IN PERSON (NO FAX OR DELIVERIES) TO THE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY NOOIV ON THE SCHEDUlED DEADLINE DATE. A TOTAL OF 11 COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS AND APPUCATION MQTERIALS (1 ORIGINAL AND 10 COPIES) AS REQUIRED WITHlN ARE TO BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW BY THE DEVEIOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE. SUBSEQUENT SUBMIITAL FOR THE COMMUNITY D£VELOPMENT BOARD WILL REQUIRE 15 COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS AND APPLICATION MATERIALS (1 ORIGINAL AND 14 COPIES). PLANS AND APPLICATIONS ARE REQUIRED TO BE COCLATED, 5fAPtED AND FOLDED INTO SEfS. THE APPLICANT, BY FILING THIS APPLICATION, AGREES TO COMPLY W1TH ALL APPLICASIE REQUIREMENTS OF TtiE COMMUNlTY DEVElOPMENT CODE. FIRE DEPT PRELIMARY 51TE PLAN REVIEW FEE: $200 APPLICA710N FEE: 1,205 PROPER7Y OWNER (PER DEEDJ: Brightwatef Btue Resort LLC MAILING ADDRESS: 2552 Drew St., STE 301,CIearwater FL 33765 PHONE NUMBER: 7�7-726-6678 EMAII: bmazas@mac.com AGENT OR REPRESENTATIVE: Terri Skapik, Woods Consulting MAILING ADDRESS: 1714 County Road 1 Suite 22, Dunedin, Fl. 34698 PHONE NUMBER: 72%786-5747 EMAfL: terriskapikQwoodsconsufting.org ADDRE55 OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: 150 -190 Brightwater Drive, Clearwater, FL 33767 PARCEL NUMBER(S): 08-29-15-04532-000-0450; 0430; 0420; 0410; 0400; 0390, 0360; and 0340 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: see attached deed(s} PROPOSED USE(S): 6 commercial docks with 30 wet slips for approved upland resort development per FLS2014-04007 DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Request to modify dock plan approved under FLS2014-04007 to reconfigure wet slips and speci�tcally identify the request widen main docEcs and piers. Totai dock area proposed is 4,844 sq ft (combined deck area of (include a11 requested code�lexibiliry,- 6 docks with 30 wet slips total). No variances to dimensional standards are being requested. e.g., reduction in required number of parking spaces, heighr, secbocks, lot Docks conform to �ide setbacks, maximum width and maximum lengths allowed. size, lof width, specific use, etc.): Planning & Developtrnnt Department,l QG S. Myrtle Avenuq Clearvuater, FL 33756, Tet: 727�62-4567; Fax: 727-562-4�65 Page 1 of 8 Revised 01/12 LL ° � earwat�r U Planning & Development Department Flexible Development Application Data Sheet PLEASE ENSURE THAT THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS FILLED OUT, IN ITS ENTIRETY. FAILURE TO COMPLETE THIS FORM WILL RESULT IN YOUR APPLICATION BEING FOUND INCOMPLETE AND POSSIBLY DEFERRED UNTIL THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION CYCLE. _�1 � 11:_�i l :_ :►> �l � ►; •� T �� EXISTING USE (currently existing on site): currently vacant; 30-unit resort attached dwelling development recently approved by city PROPOSED USE (new use, if any; plus existing, if to remain): 30 wet slips for approved 30-unit resort attached dwelling development SITE AREA: 90,691.92 sq. ft. 2.082 GROSS FLOOR AREA (total square footage of all buildings): Existing: N/A sq, ft. Proposed: N!A sq. ft. Maximum Allowable: N/A sq. ft. acres GROSS FLOOR AREA (total square footage devoted to each use, if there will be multiple uses): First use: N�A sq. ft. Second use: N/A sq.ft. Third use: N/A sq. ft. FLOOR AREA RATIO (total square footage of all buildings divided by the total square footage of ehtire sitej: Existing: N/A Proposed: N/A Maximum Aflowable: N/A BUILDING COVERAGE/FOOTPRINT (15t floor square footage of all buildings): Existing: N�A sq. ft. ( % of site) Proposed: N/A sq. ft. ( % of site) Maximum Permitted: N/A sq. ft. ( % of site) GREEN SPACE WITHIN VEHICULAR USE AREA (green space within the parking lot and interior pf site; not perimeter buffer): Existing: N/A sq. ft. ( % of site) Proposed: N/A sq. ft. ( % of site) VEHICULAR USE AREA (parking spaces, drive aislea, loading area): Existing: N/A sq. ft. ( Proposed: N/A sq. ft. ( % of site) % of site) Planning & Development Department, 100 S. MyKle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 2 of 8 Revised 01/12 IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RATIO (total square footage of impervious areas divided by the total square footage of entire site): Existing: N/A Proposed: N/A Maximum Permitted: N/A DENSITY (units, rooms or beds per acre): Existing: N/A Proposed: N/A Maximum Permitted: N/A OFF-STREET PARKING: Existing: N/A Proposed: N/A Minimum Required: N/A BUILDING FBEIGHT; Existing: N/A Proposed: N/A Maximum Permitted: N/A WHAT IS THE ESTIMATED TOTAL VALUE OF THE PROJECT UPON COMPLETION? ZONING DISTRICTS FOR ALL ADJACENT PROPERTY: North: P South: T East: T West: T 250,000 STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLA$ I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all Sworn to and subscribed before me this v� 3� �� day of representations made in this application are true and J(� � ,�j �. to me and/or by accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the ��-L... ��"Z �� , w is personally known s property described in this application. produced as identification. ., � ., „/% a Signature of property o r or representative Notary pub�(c, My commissio ex ires: �--` � �— � � , �.:,v��,.�,.,,�,�� , �,,, �`,PRY�`ef��+ HAYDEE VELEZ '�`r * '"- Notary Pubtic - State of Florida =N,� ��e My Comm. Expins Jm 31, 2017 ',��lFOF FI�A'� Commlasion � EE 870424 ��I1111N� Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myltle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, T�I: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 3 of 8 Revised 01/12 o Planning & Development Department � C earwat�r Flexible Develo ment Application p � Site Plarn Submittal Package Check list IN ADDITION TO THE COMPLETED FLEXIBLE�DEVELOPMENT (FLD) APPLICATION, ALL FLD APPLICATIONS SHALL INCLUDE A SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL PACKAGE THAT INCLUDES'THE �OLLOW�NG INFORMATION AND/OR PLANS: ❑✓ Responses to the flexibility criteria for the specific use(s) being requested as set forth in the Zoning District(s) in which the subject property is located. The attached Flexible Development Application Flexibility Criteria sheet shall be used to provide these responses. �✓ Responses to the General Applicability criteria set forth in Section 3-914.A. The atgached Flexible Development Application General Applicability Criteria sheet shall be used to provide these responses. ❑✓ A signed and sealed survey of the property prepared by a registered land surveyor including the location of the property, dimensions, acreage, location of all current structures/improvements, location of all public and private easements including official records book and page numbers and street right(s)-of-way within and adjacent to the site. ❑ If the application would result in the removal or relocation of mobile home owners residing in a mobile home park as provided in F.S. § 723.083, the application must pravide that information required by Section 4-202.A.5. ❑✓ If this application is being submitted for the purpose of a boatlift, catwalk, davit, dack, marina, pier, seawall or other similar marine structure, then the application must provide detailed plans and specifica�ions prepared by a Florida professional engineer, bearing the seal and signature of the engineer, except signed and sealed plans shall not be required for the repair or replacement of decking, stringers, railing, IowEr landings, tie piles, or the patChing or reinforcing of existing piling on private and commercial docks. ❑ A site plan prepared by a professional architect, engineer or landscape architect drawn to a minimum scale of one inch equals 50 feet on a sheet size not to exceed 24 inches by 36 inches that includes the following information: ❑ Index sheet of the same size shall be included with individual sheet numbers referenced thereon. ❑ North arrow, scale, location map and date prepared. ❑ Identification of the boundaries of phases, if development is proposed to be conEtructed in phases. ❑ Location of the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL), whether the property is located within a Special Flood Hazard Area, and the Base Flood Elevation (BFE) of the property, as applicable. ❑ Location, footprint and size of all existing and proposed buildings and structures on the site. ❑ Location and dimensions of vehicular and ped�strian circulation systems, both qn-site and off-site, with proposed points of access. ❑ Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks, curbs, water lines, sanitary sewer lines, storm drains, fire hydrants and seawalls and any proposed utility easements. ❑ Location of onsite and offsite stormwater management facilities as well as a narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including calculations. Additional data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual may be required at time of building construction permit. ❑ Location of solid waste collection facilities, required screening and provisions for accessibility for collection. ❑ Location of off-street loading area, if required by Section 3-1406. ❑ All adjacent right(s)-of-way, with indication of centerline and width, paved width, existing median cuts and intersections and bus shelters. ❑ Dimensions of existing and proposed lot lines, streets, drives, building lines, setbacks, structural overhangs and building separations. ❑ Building or structure elevation drawings that depict the proposed building height and building materials. Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myttle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tpl: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 4 of 8 Revised 01N2 ❑ Typical fioor plans, including floor plans fcr each floor of any parking garage. ❑ Demolition plan. ❑ Identification and description of watercourse>s, wetlands, t•ee masses, specimen trees, and other environmentally sensitive areas. ❑ If a deviation from the parl<ing standards is reqiaested that is „reater than 50% (excluding those standards where the difFerence between the top and bottom of the ra�ige is one parking space), then a parking demand study wi►I need to be provided. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not ��eviations to the parking standards are approved. Please see the adopted Parking Demand Study Guidelines for further information. ❑ A tree survey showing the location, DBH and species of all existing trees with a DBFI of four inches or more, and identifying those trees proposed to be removed, if any. ❑ A tree inventory, prepared by a certified arborist, of a44 trees four inches D'3H or �nore that reflects the size, canopy, and condition of such trees may be required if deemed applicable by stafF. Check with staFF. ❑ A Traffic Impact Study shall be required for all pr-oposed deve'opments if the total generated net new trips meet one or more of the following conditions: a Proposai is expected to generate 100 or rnore new trips in an�• given h�ur (directional trips, inbound or outbound on the abutting streets) and/or 1,000 or more new triE�s per day; or a Anticipated new trip generation degrades the level of service as adopted i�� the City's Comprehensive Plan to unacceptable levels; or a The study area contains a segment of roadwa�� and/or intersection w'th five reportable accidents within a prior twelve month period, or the segment and/or intersection exists on �he Cit�s annual li:ct of most hazardous locations, provided by the City of Clearwater Police Department; or � The Traffic Operations Manager or their �esi�;nee deems it iecessary to require such assessment in the plan review process. Examples include developments that �3re expected to negatively impact a constrained roadway or developments with unknown trip generation and/or other un!<nown factors. ❑ A landscape plan shall be provided for any projact �vhere there is a new use o� a chaiige of use; or an existing use is improved or remodeled in a value of 25% or more of tl�e valuation of the � rincipal structure as reflected on the property appraiser's current records, or if an amendment is required to an existing approved site pl;an; or a parking lot requires additional landscaping pursuant to the provisions of Article 3, Division 14. The landscape plan :shail include the following information, if not otherwise required in conjunction with the app�'ication for development approval: ❑ Location, size, description, specifications and quantities of �II existing arid K�roposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names. ❑ Existing trees on-site and imrnediately adjacent to the site, by �pecies, size and Mucation, including drip line. ❑ Interior landscape areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled �.nd interior lands<:ape coverage, expressed both in square feet, exclusive of perimeter landscaped strips, and as a percentage of the pav�d area coverage of the parking lot and vehicular use areas. ❑ Location of existing and proposed structures and impro✓ements, including bui: not limited to sidewalks, walls, fences, pools, patios, dumpster pads, pad mounted transform�rs, tire hydrarts, ove�rhead obstructions, curbs, water lines, sanitary sewer lines, storm drains, seawalls, ui:ility easements, treatment of all ground surfaces, and any other features that may influence the proposed landscape. ❑ Location of parking areas and other vehicular use areas, including parking spa�:es, circulation aisles, interior landscape islands and curbing. ❑ Drainage and retention areas, including swa es, side slopes anc bottom elevatior�s. ❑ Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscap�d bufFers �ncluding sight triangles, if any. Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myitle Avenue, Cleaswater, FL 33756, T�el: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 5 of 8 Revised 01/12 � (� Planning & Development Department � 1�.,r ��at�� Flexible Develo ment Application P � General Applicability Criteria PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO EACH OF THE SIX �6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CR17ERIA EXPLAINING HOW, IN DETAIL, THE CRITERION IS BEING COMPLIED WITH PER THIS DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL. 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT 1 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate developmant and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT 1 The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood ofthe proposed use. SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT 1 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT 1 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT 1 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT 1 Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 6 of 8 Revised 01112 LL o Planning & Development Department ' �t��t��r Flexible Development Application � U Flexibility Criteria PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO THE APPLICABLE FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR THE SPHCIFIC USE(S) BEING REQUESTED AS SET FORTH IN THE ZONING DISTRICT�S) IN WHICH THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED. EXPLAIN HOW, IN DETAIL, EACH CRITERION IS BEING COMPLIED WITH PER THIS DEVELOPMENT PRQPOSAL {USE SEPARATE SHEETS AS NECESSARY). 1_ SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT 2 2. SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT 2 3. SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT 2 4. SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT 2 5, SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT 2 6. SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT 2 ,. SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT 2 $. SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT 2 Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 7 of 8 Revised 01/12 LL ° � �ear�vater Planning & Development Department Flexible Development Application " Affidavit to Authorize Agent/Representative 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed - PRINT full names: BRIGHTWATER BLUE RESORT LLC 2. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property: 150 - 190 BRIGHTWATER DR.; 08-29-15-04932-000-0450; 0430; 0420; 0410; 0400; 0390; 0360; and 0340 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for (describe request); 4,844 SQ FT COMMERCIAL DOCKS (COMBINED DOCK AREA FOR ALL 51X (6) DOCKS WITH A TOTAL OF 30 WET SLIPS FOR USE BY APPROVED UPLAND RESORT ATTACHED DWELLING DEVELOPMENT 4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: TERRI SKAPIK/ WOODS CONSULTING as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to afFeCt such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce th� City of Clearwater, Florida to cpnsider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. That (I/we), he undersigned autho ', hereby certify that the foregoing is true and cCrrect. Pro rty Owner Property Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Property Owner BEFORE ME THE UNDERSIGNED, AN OFFICER DULY COMMISSIONED BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, ON THIS C�Z �J! �� DAY OF � C� , G�I 7-' , PERSONALLY APPEARED �J I L�- lc'�/'1" �� WHO HAVING BEEN FIRST DULY SWORN DEPOSED AND SAYS THAT HE/SHE FULLY UNDERSTANDS THE CONTENTS OF TH� AFFIDAVIT THAT HE/SHE SIGNED. " ,,, �,��,, a `=ti*PY �'U��/�� HAYDEE VELE2 , t .°�"__ Notary Public - State ot Florida �._...., .. :;� '�= My Comm. Expires J�n 31, 2D17 '%�s�,�� ,'�` Commit:fon � EE 070424 otary PubliC Signature Notary Npy Commission Expires: �"� � �"'r� � , Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtie Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 8 of 8 Revised 01/12 DRC Comments and Responses Engineerin� Prior to Community Devetopment Board: Review 1. General engineering conditions from FLS2014-04007 are met. No additional information needed for this review. __ _ R�'��fi�S�i ��KfiiC1111�i��DG�fl. Prior to Buildin� Pemit: 1. Will the docks meet federal ADA guidelines? RESf�dNSE: YES, THE F1XED W�ODEf� D{)CKS ARE ADA-C��IIIPLIANT. 2. If any additional utilities are required for the docks, please provide details. RESI�CINSE: AClCJVQWLED�ED. General Notes: 1. Sheet C4 was reviewed for general engineering criteria. The additional details provided in the plan set may have been necessary for other reviews to provide flexible development approval. Construction details shall be reviewed more thoroughly prior to receipt of the building permit. RESP�NS�: ACKN{)U1/LEDGED, Environmental Prior to issuance of Buildin� Permit: Review 1. A dock/dredge and fill permit may be required prior to conducting any additions. Contact Pinellas County Water and Navigation Authority at (727) 453-3385 for more information. R�SPflNSE. ACf<NOV1/LEDGED. 2. Provide erosion control measures on plan sheet and provide notes detailing erosion control methods. RESPONSE: SEE ATfAGHED DOCK REDUCED-PLAN SH�ET_].4. General Notes: 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. R£�RON�'�: ACKNaWLEDGfD, _. 2. Additional permits from State agencies, such as the Southwest Florida Water Management District or Florida Department of Environmental Protection, may be required. Approval does not relieve the applicant from the requirements to obtain all other required permits and authorizations. #��SPUNSE: ACKNO�LEDGEp, Land Prior to Buildin� Permit: Resource 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, prior to Review issuance of a building permit any and all performance based erosion and sedimentation control measures must be approved by Environmental and or Stormwater Engineering, be installed properly, and inspected. R��PC)�SE: A�KNQWLEDG�Q. Planning General Site Plan and Application Comments Review 1. The docks shown on the full-sized site plans are different from those presented in the reduced set. Please correct and clarify. RESPQNSE: ACF�N01NLEpGfQ: T1-IE FULL-SIZE PLAN SET FIAS BEEiV REIVICIVE� FftOM TH€. APPI.ICAT[ON PACKAGE. IT 11VpS INCI,UDED 11JIERELY A� A:f��R�iV±CE T0 5H�V11 THE 1JPLAND aEVELOFMEN� (�O� UNI�Sj.AtVD �d.Cl�S (�� SLI�S) THPcT WER� PREVlOUSLY APPF�OV�D IN .IUN'E 2t�14. 2. Please provide a dimension for each setback (east and west). R�SRp,N��: A�KN0111/L�DG�Q.I�LEASf 5�E SHf�T 5 fJ� THE DOCK �R�AVI�INGS. 3. The area for dock E is provided as 802 sq.ft. where I calculate it to be 834. Please clarify and correct. The total dock area would then be 4,844 sq.ft. which is consistent with the request on the application. RESP.QN�E: ACKNQWLEDGED. TH�RE VUAS A TYPO OM SHEfT 1 OF THE �QCI�;t?R�4WIt�IG�. TH� �#Y;PCi HAS BEEN CQRRECT�p T� S"�#T� T�I� 4�C�C AR�X1:4F DC�CK E IS 834 $Q FT FOR A TOTAL OF 4,8�44 SQ FT AS NE1T�D !N THf A�PPtICATIaN'. 4. Clarify if it is a fair statement to say that the length of the docks not only avoid seagrass but will also eliminate or greatly reduce instances of prop dredging. If this is a fair statement then you may want to incorporate it into your narrative and responses to appropriate criteria. i�ESP.Q!�l�f� ACKN{?.VIILEQGE�. TfiE STA�EI#�I�(VT HAS BE.EIV':11�C�E�P�R�ATED l�TO'`l"FIE �t1lR�TT'EN .RESPaNSES. 5. Indicate the designated slip areas on the plan. RESPOlVSE; ACKN0I.NLEDGED. PLEASE NQTE SHEETS 1 THROklG1-� S O� TH� D�CI4�fl�iA1�V1�IG5 SH01N SMALL C�RCLED NUMBE#�S 1 THRQU�H 5 AT EACti dOCK THAT ARE TH'E 5LiP ARfAS. EACH DOCK 1�AS 5 SLIP�;�OR A fiflT�AL OF 30 S�I�PS. 6. Please provide a sheet which more clearly shows the footprint of the building. RESPQMSE: A£KN�INLEDGED. PLEASE NOTE THf UPLAMD CIVIL PLANS FiAVE BfEN R�M4V�D FROM TME APPL-�CATI�N P�1C�AGE. H01A1E'��R,1'HE FC3�TPRi1�1T SH�t��l (��f. `THE RE`DU�ED-SIZE DCl�K �'RA�k��C`iS D:l3 SHt3�fV THE ��R�� fC��l'�RI°N"T' (�F ��i�.�1PP'R{}��D UP�AN`t3;BL��L�1�+GS:. 7. You can probably remove the criteria dealing specifically with resort Traffic Eng Review attached dwellings as that use has been approved already. This is just a request for the docks. i�ESP!Q�1��, ��1�111d�;�[?�;ED. ��SflRT C1�I��Rl�4 H�4�� B�EN R��(3�f�'Q. General Applicabilitv Criteria Comments S. Criteria 1 through 6- no comments R��PONSE: ACKlVOWIEDGED. Disclaimer 9. Please be aware that additional comments may be generated at or subsequent to the DRC meeting based upon applicant response to DRC comments. RESP(�JVS�; ��KNOVkI�.�QGED. 10. Please review the stated request closely. It is ultimately the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the request and submitted proposal are accurate and consistent with each other. R��P(��15�: A�I�N011VtEDGECI, 11. Please resubmit 15 complete sets of the application and all supporting materials by noon September 12, 2014 in order to be placed on the October 21, 2014 CDB agenda. RESPONSE: ACKM0INLEDGED. General Notes: 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. __ _ �tf�A�NSE: ��I�U#J#�EDGE�. EXHIBIT 1 DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST— DOCKS REVISED PER DRC COMMENTS 09-04-14 Repuest: The subject property consists of 8 separate parcels associated with addresses 148 through 196 Brightwater Drive on Clearwater Beach. The lots once housed several motel/hotels consisting of a seventy-four (74) rooms. Existing conditions are primarily vacant with the exception of an unfinished concrete block structure at the east end of the property. The parcels falls within the City of Clearwater's community redevelopment area known as the 'Small Hotel' District under Beach by Design and within the Tourist Zoning Designation for Clearwater Beach. The subject upland development is known as Brightwater Blue Residences and was recently approved for thirty (30) Resort Attached Dwelling [RAD] units with thirty (30) private boat slips. This application represents a change to the (6) docks and (30) wet slips that were previously approved. The new proposed docks have been reconfigured from what was previously approved and are larger in deck area. Itemized Repuests: 1. Docks: a. (6) docks: 4,844 sq ft total deck area and (30) wet slips total b. No variances are being requested Narrative: The Brightwater Blue Residences project is located along the north side of Brightwater Drive within lots 34 through 46, inclusive. With the exception of an unfinished concrete block structure at the east end of the property, the overall site has been cleared. Originally, the sum total of the previously listed lots contained 74 hotel/motel rooms or overnight accommodation units. Brightwater Blue Residences has a total of 30 Resort Attached Dwelling [RAD] units proposed with 30 previously-approved boat slips. There are a total of six (6) docks proposed as part of the Brightwater Blue Residences. The total deck area proposed for all (6) docks is 4,844 sf with (5) wet slips each for a total of (30) wet slips. One slip will be associated with each RAD unit proposed. The slips will be available to hotel guests and/or resort unit owners and the slips will be occupied by recreational vessels. The docks proposed are labeled A through F. There will be no fueling, no pump out services, no boat repairs and no public use of the docks. The submerged areas were surveyed by an environmental scientist to identify and locate submerged resources along the shoreline. The docks are designed such that there is no decking proposed to be located over the sea grass beds to avoid impacts to these protected resources and to avoid prop-scarring of the marine bottom. Handrails and signage are also proposed to prohibit mooring along the dock walkouts and areas where the sea grass beds are located. The dock walkouts are located, to the extent possible, to avoid sea grass beds. Additionally, the widths of the walkouts are reduced to 4 ft where they pass over grass to minimize impacts to the grass beds. As part of the project, three manatee education signs will be installed to promote manatee protection and awareness to vessel operators. Page �1 Brightwater Blue Residences DOCKS Exhibits 1 and 2 Fire protection is provided for the docks as well as potable water and electrical power. The fire protection and water details are provided in Woods Consulting reduced-size dock plans. A transformer for the docks will be implemented and will be permitted separately by the electrical contractor. The proposed water feeds and transformer location will be determined prior to the building permit being issued and will be permitted separately by the site contractor(s). EXHIBIT 1 GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA FOR DOCKS 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale bulk coveraqe, density and character of adiacent properties in which it is located. The developed properties along Brightwater Drive are mostly comprised of multi-family residential properties but there are a few small scale hotels. Several larger scale hotels have been approved by the City of Clearwater for parcels located on Hamden waterfront, which is now constructed. All of the properties along Brightwater Drive currently have docks and many were built within the last five to eight years for the newer upland developments. As dock use is tied to a respective upland use, the motel docks are used exclusively by motel guests and the multi-family or private residential docks are used only by resident owners. For the Brightwater Blue Residences project, the development is comprised entirely of Resort Attached Dwelling Units. The units may be individually owned or rented to the general public— as allowed under the Resort Ordinance. As the docks are proposed for use only by the unit owners or the resort guests, the docks will be in harmony with the character of the adjacent properties and in character with the use of the docks at adjacent properties. In order to demonstrate that the proposed docks are in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage and density of the adjacent properties, it is important to note that there are no other projects along Brightwater Drive that are similar in scale to this development. This project has come to fruition through the assemblage of eight individual parcels that have a combined waterfront length of 780 linear feet. When considering the dimensional standards for docks, the length, width and side setbacks are based on the overall length of waterfront owned which would in fact allow docks that are 585 ft in length, 585 ft in width and would require 78 ft side setbacks. A single dock with these dimensions would appear enormous at this location. However, the goal of our dock design effort was to compliment, to the extent possible, the scale of the existing adjacent properties by having individual docks positioned along the seawall to accommodate the individual upland buildings. For this reason, the project is better viewed as 6 sma/ler dock projects for the overall development. To demonstrate the compatibility of the proposed docks to the existing and approved docks along Brightwater, please note the following: • The property immediately to the east is Brightwater Townhomes and is a 10 unit townhome development with a single multi-family dock providing 8 wet slips. The existing docks extend into the water approximately 150 ft which would be allowed for a parcel with slightly more than 200 linear ft of shoreline. The majority of the dock walkout area extends over sea grass beds and is railed to avoid mooring in these areas. This dock is very similar to the individual docks proposed as part of Brightwater Blue development. • The property immediately to the west is Harborside Townhomes and is a 6 unit townhome development with 3 shared docks for a total of 6 slips. The docks are positioned on shared lot Pag� �2 Brightwater Blue Residences DOCKS Exhibits 1 and 2 lines and are shared by each resident owner parking on their respective sides of the dock. As the unit owners of Brightwater Blue Residences will not have fee simple ownership to the water, shared docks are not possible. • The property at the eastern terminus of Brightwater Drive is Brightwater Point and is a 20 unit condominium development with two multi-family docks providing 14 slips. • The property at the western end of Brightwater and Hamden Drives is the Tropicana Resort which recently received City approval for a new 18-slip commercial dock for a new hotel development. • Many of the remaining properties located to the west of the subject property and across the street are also multi-family developments with docks. Many of the properties are platted with fee simple ownership to the water and shared docks are used by the resident owners — similar to Harborside Townhomes. • The remaining small motels located along Brightwater Drive have older docks that have essentially remained unchanged since their original construction in the early 1970s. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourape the appropriate development and use of adlacent land and buildinq or sipnificantly impair the value thereof The proposed docks with 30 wet slips will actually significantly improve the value of the surrounding properties. The subject properties have been vacant for several years so this development will improve the blighted condition of these properties and will rejuvenate sales on Brightwater Drive and bring tourists to the surrounding areas. The original 12 docks have nearly all been demolished and the proposed docks will be constructed to coincide with the upland development. The proposed docks will not hinder or discourage development at adjacent properties as both adjacent properties are fully developed. Regardless, as noted above, the property to the east is the Brightwater Townhomes. The proposed docks provide a generous setback to fully accommodate the existing development and use of the existing boat slips. The property to the west is the Harborside Townhomes and a side setback of 97.5 ft is proposed, which is more generous than the 78 ft setback required. Additionally, the proposed docks do not extend into the waterway more than 25% the width of the waterway to not hinder use of the waterway or developments across the waterway on Devon. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residinp or workinp in the neiphborhood of the proposed use. The proposed docks will be professionally operated by the Resort and a dock assistant will be available during normal work hours to assist with slip operations. All slip occupants will be required to abide by the Resort Rules and Regulations. Such regulations often address appropriate behavior, enforcing proper use of boating equipment, enforcing proper use boating and navigation waterways, boater education, and environmental education. Page �3 Brightwater Blue Residences DOCKS Exhibits 1 and 2 4. The proposed development is desipned to avoid traffic conqestion. The slips will be for use by the unit owners and resort guests only and are not for the general public. Therefore, the proposed docks do not create additional traffic on Clearwater Beach. It is anticipated that resort owners or resort guests may arrive to this vacation destination by boat which will in fact decrease traffic congestion on Clearwater Beach. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The proposed docks are consistent with the zoning and land use for this project. The Clearwater Beach area is dependent on waterfront developments to attract tourists and residents to the area. By having wet slips available to resort unit owners and resort guests, the proposed dock will improve the community character of the area in allowing guests to arrive at their resort destination by boat. 6. The desipn of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, includinp visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on rhe adiacent properties. There will be no negative adverse effects visually as the docks will be fixed docks and constructed of wood or composite decking supported by timber pilings. The construction materials and installation requirements will adhere to the Pinellas County dock construction code. There will be no negative adverse effects acoustically as the docks will be for use by recreational vessels owned by unit owners or resort guests. There will be no high/dry slips, no load out, any wash racks, any fueling facilities, etc. There will be no adverse olfactory effects as there is no fixed sewage pump out station or upland holding tanks proposed, trash receptacles will be emptied by Resort employees daily to make sure there are no garbage odors. Additionally, there will be no fish cleaning stations onsite. Page �4 Brightwater Blue Residences DOCKS Exhibits 1 and 2 EXHIBIT 2 DOCK CRITER/A SECTION 3-601C.3. (a) THROUGH (h) (a) Use and Compatibilitv As noted previously, the developed properties along Brightwater Drive are mostly comprised of multi- family residential properties with a few small scale hotels. Several larger scale hotels were recently approved at Hamden Drive. All of the properties along Brightwater Drive currently have docks and dock use is tied to a respective upland use. As the proposed docks will only be used by the unit owners and resort guests and will not be available to the general public, the proposed dock use is consistent with the use of other existing docks on Brightwater Drive. In order to demonstrate that the proposed docks will be compatible with the adjacent properties, it is important to again note that there are no other projects along Brightwater Drive that are similar in scale to this project. This project has a combined waterfront length of 780 linear feet and a single dock with these dimensions would appear enormous at this location. However, the goal was to compliment, to the extent possible, the scale of the existing adjacent properties by having individual docks positioned along the seawall to accommodate the individual upland buildings. For this reason, the project is better viewed as 6 smaller dock projects for the overall development. (b) Impacts on Existina Water Recreation Activities Persons using the adjacent waterways for recreational or commercial purposes will not be impacted by the proposed docks. The proposed docks do not impede navigation or use of existing recreational areas. The docks do not extend more than 25% the width of the waterway to preserve use of the waterway. (c) Impacts to Naviqation As noted above, the proposed docks do not impede navigation as the docks do not extend more than 25% the width of the waterway to preserve use of the waterway. (d1 lmpacts on Marine Environment The docks, as designed, will have no adverse impacts to the marine environment. Please find enclosed Woods Consulting plan drawing sheets showing the location of the existing sea grass beds along the shoreline. The proposed docks were designed not having decking located over sea grass beds which render the areas within 40 ft. to 50 ft. of the seawall as unsuitable for slips. The walkouts for the docks are only 4 ft. wide where they pass over grass to reduce impacts to sea grass. There will also be several No Mooring signs, Caution Sea Grass signs and handrails proposed in locations where mooring is prohibited to ensure boats do not moor in the areas of the sea grass beds. Woods Consulting plan drawing sheets that provide the details for the resource protection signage. Furthermore, the existing depths ensure that boats mooring in the slips will have a minimum of 1 ft. Page �5 Brightwater Blue Residences DOCKS Exhibits 1 and 2 � ,,, c". � (i ElrightwatQr Blue R4sid<�nces �C�GK�.Fxhibits 1 and 2 clearance between the deepest draft of a vessel and the marine bottom at mean low water to protect ��s�ib�dl$�l;�r;�.�tt �repcscyaic�'dng;i�f:#11'��f.��'frit�cbc�ifi:v;[��: �=.;- .ti��:e�� s� ��a<ureC 3t ti12 SIlC1fE?�tft2, ar 78 feet usin� the pra�;.�a�rt�� w�� e; ?i',0 fc�r:c. �rh�� acCafa� !�-�t:�:�cks as pro�ose� are a�c�roximatefy (e) Bl�d�l/bit,�i'l�dalltV'c;r.sul,:r.^k�t_ urau�°;n,;5j�;rt�;.� .;:.��:..,-.'E?:sck:i. The mooring of 30 boats is not expected to adversely impact water quality. The new docks will be installed using pre-treated pilings that are vinyl-wrapped from the mud-line to 2 ft. above'the mean high water line to prevent leaching of copper, arsenic and/or chromium from the timber into the water. Also, there are no fueling, marine service activities such as hull bottom scraping or bottom painting, no wash-racks, no commercial activities, etc. that would contribute to a water quality problem. The facility will also provide proper trash receptacles to avoid overboard discharges of waste into the water. if) Impacts on Natural Resources As noted above, the docks will not impact natural resources. Please see the Woods Consulting plan drawing sheets which shows there are no submerged resources in the dock areas and the sea grass beds that are present along the shoreline are avoided to the extent possible with the current design to protect the grass beds and prevent prop-scarring of the marine bottom. 1g1 Impacts on Wetlands Habitat/Uplands There are no wetlands, only surface waters and submerged vegetation at the site. The docks are located to avoid these resources and prevent prop-scarring of the marine bottom. Handrails, No Mooring signs and Caution Sea Grass signs will all serve to prevent boats from negatively impacting these resources. Woods Consulting plan drawing sheets that provide the details for the resource protection signage. (h) Dimensional Standards 1. Proposed Use: The 6 docks will provide a total of 30 boat slips for use by the unit owners or resort guests. 2. Propertv Width: The property width measured at the shoreline for the property is 780 ft. and is used to determine the required side setbacks, length and the width of the proposed docks. Setbacks: The required side setbacks are calculated as 10% of the property width as measured at the shoreline, or 78 feet using the property width of 780 feet. The actual setbacks as proposed are approximately 97.5 ft. Sheet 5 of Woods Consulting plan drawings for the dock setbacks. Page �s Brightwater Blue Residences DOCKS Exhibits 1 and 2 4. Lenpth: The dock is allowed to extend 75% the width of the property, or 585 ft. with a property width of 780 ft. The actual maximum length as proposed is 103 ft for 5 of the docks (Docks A through D and F) and 111 ft for pock E. Therefore the docks are compliant with the allowed length. Although a strict interpretation of the code allows a larger dock, the docks are much shorter in length to not impede navigation and thus do not extend into the waterway by more than 25% the width of the waterway. 5. Width: The dock is allowed a width of 75% the width of the property, or 585 ft. using the property width of 780 ft. The actual width as proposed is 585 ft., when measuring the overall width — including the docks, slips and fairways between docks. 6. Area: The total deck area for all 6 docks is 4,844 sq ft. 7. Width of Waterway: The width of the waterway at the location of the proposed docks as measured perpendicular to the shoreline at the tightest point is approximately 485 feet and 490 ft. at the widest point. The maximum length of the docks does not exceed 25% the width of the waterway. 8. Sea qrasses As noted above, there are no anticipated adverse impacts to the marine environment. The enclosed Woods Consulting plan drawings provide the locations of the submerged vegetation along the entire shoreline. The proposed docks and slips were designed to avoid impacts to submerged aquatic vegetation (as no slips are located within 40 ft. to 50 ft. of the existing seawall). The dock walkouts are located to the extent possible where previous docks were Ibcated to ensure boats do not moor in the areas of the sea grass beds. Handrails and signage are proposed to prohibit mooring in areas where there are sea grass beds. Furthermore, the existing depths ensure that boats mooring in the slips will have a minimum of 1 ft. clearance between the deepest draft of a vessel and the marine bottom at mean low water to avoid prop-scarring of the marine bottom. Page �7 Brightwater Blue Residences DOCKS Exhibits 1 and 2 SCALE: NTS COMMERCIAL DOCKS TABLE OF CONTENTS SHEET 1 - PROJECT OVERVIEW SHEET 2- PROPOSED DOCKS A& B SHEET 3- PROPOSED DOCKS C& D SHEET 4- PROPOSED DOCKS E& F SHEET 5 - DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS SHEET 6- BENTHIC CONDITIONS WITH DEPTHS SHEET 7- BENTHIC CONDITIONS WITH DEPTHS CONT. SHEET 8- BENTHIC CONDITIONS WITH DEPTHS TO CHANNEL SHEET 9- CROSS SECTION (A - A') SHEET 10 - PROPOSED DOCK DETAILS SHEET 11 - PROPOSED DOCK DETAILS SHEET 12 - PROPOSED DOCK DETAILS SHEET '�3 - PILING �fVRAR DETAILS3 SHEET 14 - TURBIDITIY DETAILS SHEET 15 - PROPOSED RESOURCE PROTECTION SIGNAGE Application # (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) SHEET 16 - FIRE AND WATER PLAN SHEET 17 - FIRE AND WATER PLAN CONT. SHEET 18 - FIRE AND WATER PLAN CONT. SHEET 19 - FIRE AND WATER PLAN CONT. SHEET 20 - FIRE AND WATER PLAN CONT. SHEET 21 - ELECTRICAL Tue, 29 Jul 2014 - 12:36pm F:\PROJECTS\150-180 Brightwater-Mazas (481-09)\CAD\BRIGHTWATER - FINAL PLANS 05-18-14 - Standard\BRIGHTWATER - REDESIGN 07-01-14.dwg WOODS CONSULTING 7714 COUNTY ROAD 1, SUITE 22 DUNEDIN, FL 34698 PH. (727) 786-5747 FAX (727) 786-7479 REVISED: 07-01-14 BRIGHTWATER BLUE RESORT DOCKS TABLE OF CONTENTS WATERBODY WIDTH ±485' WATERFRONT WIDTH ±780' MHW +o.ss� MLW -�.2a� ELEVATIONS REFERENCE NAVD-1988 �` �C .Q, . � � � *. i _ ._ SHEET 0 FICATE OF ;GENSF.:�S,�.:.� 0 15586 ';� % �� .* ' �m—o � omvm * ' �°Q"�m � ' �� 0�00 EaoF :�: �� ,; W�� C �OP �� aW�� . �C� ��• � Q � �� `,! o�W .. C �NA��. �W�� U SCALE: 1"=100' COMMERCIAL DOCKS Application # DOCKS A THROUGH D& F: (5) IDENTICAL DOCKS: EACH HAS: 67 FT X 4 FT WALKOUT = 268 SQ FT EACH HAS: 39 FT X 6 FT MAIN DOCK = 234 SQ FT EACH HAS: (2) 30 FT X 5 FT PIERS = 300 SQ FT TOTAL DECK AREA = 802 SQ FT (5) SLIPS AT EACH DOCK DOCK E: 75 FT X 4 FT WALKOUT = 300 SQ FT (LONGER TO AVOID SLIPS IN SEAGRASS) EACH HAS: 39 FT X 6 FT MAIN DOCK = 234 SQ FT EACH HAS: (2) 30 FT X 5 FT PIERS = 300 SQ FT Z I TOTAL DECK AREA = 834 SQ FT J (5) SLIPS AT EACH DOCK �I � �a' COCK A DOCK B DOCK G ��1 y„ � 5. . . 5 . . • 5 • • 5 • • ' S. . . 5 . � I 3.0 3.0 29. 3.0 �3 .0 29. ' W 10 .0 •m � 029. � O 0 0 0 m 6 �I . ia.o• io}I.a Z...:............. ..... 4.. . 3� 6 4' 35. 6. I I4. m - I DO�K D �.0 � • p. . 3 .0 • 0 9' 3 .0 3 . m ' 6. � � � �G`.0 6. 67. �• . R : ?:� .:�::�:�:t=.'•:: �:t'[�:�:�� : _ .. . I �i}i• :t2}: � [ i::: •}}.y...,� ... DOCK E I.0 0 >9' . UU(:K r m � 3 .0 • .0 ' 3 .0 . 0 ` / • 0 9• ' 111.0 yI m 3�.0 . .... ..�.': L'd:: : 6 • . 0n 0 Thu, 04 Sep 2014 - 12:33pm F:\PROJECTS\150-180 Brightwater-Mazas (481-09)\CAD\BRIGHTWATER - FINAL PLANS 05-18-14 - Standard\BRIGHTWATER - REDESIGN 07-01-14.dwg WOODS CONSULTING 1714 COUNiY ROAD 1, SURE 22 DUNEDIN FL 34698 PH. (727� 786-5747 F,� c�z�� 86-�4�9 REVISED: 07-01-14 BF�iGHiiIVATER BLUE RESOi�i DOCKS DOCKS A - F ovERViEw (5) DOCKS 802 SF EACH; (1) DOCK 834 SF TOTAL SQUARE FEET 4,844 WATERBODY WIDTH ±485' WATERFRONT WIDTH ±780' MHW +o.ss� MLW -�.za' ELEVATIONS REFERENCE NAVD-1988 (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) ,, � 1A� i .��. �� /v � /�� /^Q .� /�� Q� / � �� SHEET 1 TION #27664 W � i� � °oQ�� o�° � J 11% II1 a�--^ QwNI� UQ�V oQ�� w _J U SCALE: 1"=30' COMMERCIAL DOCKS Application # (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) N — — SEESHEET9FOR �� _ Z�J% WIDTH CROSSSECTIONA-A' F WATERWAY DOCK A q� DOCK B w�LINE o , o o , o 0 0 0 0 Z 5� 5. 5� 5. �� w o 0 0 o a o � 30.0 29, 30.0 30.0 29, 30.0 a 0 � � � 0 � � 4 W � 3.0 FT DEPTH � O .O � AT MEAN ° � 03.� ° �� LOW WATER 4 0 4. 1 O• w 5 35. 6� 3� 6. _ - - ._ 0 0 ---3 — �� i \ — — i �� 3- I 6 ..0 Tue, 29 Jul 2014 - 12:36pm F:\PROJECTS\150-180 Brightwater-Mazas (481-09)\CAD\BRIGHTWATER - FINAL PLANS 05-18-14 - Standard\BRIGHTWATER - REDE5IGN 07-01-14.dwg s j� SHEET 2 Y� WOODS CONSULTING gRIGHTWATER BLUE RESORT DOCKS :�'� � �� 276s F 1714 COUNTY ROAD 1, SUITE 22 DUNEDIN, FL 34698 y PH. (727) 786-5747 '� Q��; �� ' �• (r i F,� `'2'„86_'4'9 P RO POS E D DOC KS A& B ° ��= s W �t REVISED:07-01-14 � : �m—o r"O o`°m� . � ,. 0�� F •;�� 3�vm : poo�o � �� .C� / <!/ � � u ,..l.. �� •.< 0 QP:'� � w �� WATERBODYWIDTH ±485' ��i�SS • R4 • �j�,�� =W�� WATERFRONT WIDTH +780' �� NAL EN �� a .. .. ��n�� °Q�� MHW +o.s5' MLW -�.24' �nw _ J ELEVATIONS REFERENCE NAVD-1988 � SCALE: 1"=30' COMMERCIAL DOCKS Application# (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) - 25% WIDTH N DOCK C OF WATERWAY zu�E - — — — — �� _ DOCK D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 _ _ s 0 5. 5 � o — — o �— 5.0 5.0 ° 0 0 0 0 30.0 30.0 29. 30.0 � o 30.0 4 O � O O � 29. 30.0 � o � � 3' 0 10 .0 6 4. O 6 ° ° 0 35. 0 6. 0 35. 4 � 6. 3.0 AT�MEAN �30. � O .� \ C .O LOW WATER�- � �j � �"' _ C �-- 1 � � 3 _ _ � .� -,� ` ' \ � \ 6 .0 � � 15/04932/000/0390 ' Tue, 29 Jul 2014 - 12:36pm F:IPROJECTS\150-180 Brightwater-Mazas (481-09)\CAD\BRIGHTWATER - FINAL PLANS 05-18-14 - Standard\BRIGHTWATER - REDESIGN 07-01-14.dwg SHEET 3 wo,00sTMONSULE2NG BRIGHTWATER BLUE RESORT DOCKS �,,•F��O�'�''�`' RTIFICATEOF DUNEDIN, fL 34698 ` � � N #27664 PH. (727) 786-5747 �G ••�•• �i F� �'2','86-'4'9 . P RO POS E D DOC KS C& D •�' �� = : ,: ,� ' REVISED:07-01-14 � �m-o � i � * � °omm� � ��*/� avm 9/� ' � � 3proo : '• S TA'FE � J'� � : ,n•. ,c F �� W"�� WATERBODY WIDTH ±485' ��•.; p R`p P.•��,�� =Q�� ♦ U WATERFRONT WIDTH +780' ��i s/ � ' "" �1G"�� o� W � MHW +o.ss� MLW -�.2a� ��,��NAL�E��` � J�� ELEVATIONS REFERENCE NAVD-1988 � SCALE: 1"=40' COMMERCIAL DOCKS Appiication# (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) -� N — —�� DOCK E > � e — �i1�E — � S e /� .� e o � — — — — � O � 3 /0 � , � � 9'0 ° ° DOCK F 25% WIDTH � a OF WATERWAY 4Q 3 •0 � � LINE 10 .0^ 6. � °3 .0 � .0 � � � � 35.0 � / , �29.0 / u'� / � 4.0 111.0 � �7 . 0 6. � 3 � . 0 O _ ,� �3\� 4.0 � � '� 10 .O 3.0 FT DEPTH� AT MEAN � LOW WAT ��--� / � n . _ _ �! Tue, 29 Jul 2014 - 1237pm F:\PROJECTS\150-180 Brightwater-Mazas (481-09)\CADI6RIGHTWATER - FINAL PLANS 05-18-14 - Standard\BRIGHTWATER - REDESIGN 07-01-14.dwg SHEET 4 WOODS CONSULTING BRIGHTWATER BLUE RESORT DOCKS ,•��p�l�p ��j'FN 2;ss F 1714 COUNiI' ROAD 1, SUITE 22 DUNEDIN, FL 34698 �� G�.•' I� FAX (727) 786-7479 , Q�\ ' • •• (r ��i PROPOSED DOCKS E & F _ . :�- ;� REVISED: 07-01-14 � . � o'"�° WATERBODY WIDTH ±485' WATERFRONT WIDTH +780' MHW +o.ss� MLW -�.2a� ELEVATIONS REFERENCE NAVD-1988 � :74 � omm� • � � Oovm �� / ' � O�oO ��~ S �E� : �'� 3O°0" T�'•'t�� 7 � •��/��` HKNN ��s �•• � R 1 � P�� =Q�� '�,�;�iVALEN�� oQF� 111111 -U SCALE: 1"=100' COMMERCIAL DOCKS I W I z J ��/ 1.6 W a O � I a � I W � Z W I � W x 3 x � 585.0 - U 70. s.. .5 . . .5 . . Zg, 3 .0 3 .0 Zg ) 0 m O 0 10.0• � 350� 6� 4� 3� . . , . Application # (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) • N 7t1�E ' _. S • �.0'�0. 'S.0 • 3 .0 � .0 • 7. m 3 .0 , . . 0 9. • ' � � p 3 .0 10A 6 •.0' p 3 .0 , • 5. 6 .0 '� 11 .0 � 0 9•� . I 7 .0 / 6. 3 / 1 . . 0n /4 `m Ur m� � y � 0 � U / /�� 7. � �� Q / Q� � �Q / �Z � � °� I i! I _�__� -' r � ,, - BRI6HTWATER DRIVE � � � _ ` � � \ ` ` \ Tue, 29 Jul 2014 - 12:38pm F:\PROJECTS\150-180 Brightwater-Mazas (481-09)\CAD\BRIGHTWATER - FINAL PLANS 05-18-14 - Standard�BRIGHTWATER - REDESIGN 07-01-14.dwg SHEET 5 WOODSCONSULTING BRIGHTWATER BLUE RESORT DOCKS �.;,��Q�A�CERTIFICATEOF 1714 COUNTY ROAD 1, surrE z2 AAI�IB 9 TION #27664 DUNEDIN, FL 34698 � �' � PH. (727) 786-5747 D I M E N S I O NA L STA N DARDS ��P••'''�� '• ', FAX (727) 786-7479 ♦ � REVISED: 07-01-14 r - �� O � omvm �r = ° "' � � * :� � � � oo�m �� W � 300�0 • � �n : � g-� E �F � a�._.� � •� `•�•�� FW-KNN %, ,c•�.'cL �.R�O.�� =Q�� '�� ;,S �O N A� �; �`��, � a � � U SCALE: 1 "=50' COMMERCIAL DOCKS SPARSE TO MEDIUM CUBAN SHOAL GRASS � Application # 5 � C� MEDIUM TO DENSE CUBAN SHOAL GRASS OYSTER DEBRIS/CLUSTERS (APPROXIMATELY � 10°/a VIABLE) �-�.:= �- .4 �;: �:�.:.=:= :.:.:- 3 � - =fi:�.:.-'='�'•'=:.: .... - �1 -- _. . ... .--........ �� S� � �� _�� (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) C 5� s SPARSE TO MEDIUM CUBAN SHOA GRASS 4�� - T2��:: .'1:.5- � Tue, 29 Jul 2014 - 12:46pm F:\PROJECTS\150-180 Brightwater-Mazas (481-09)1CAD\BRIGHTWATER - FINAL PLANS 05-18-14 - Standard\BRIGHTWATER BENTHIC & FIRE PROTECTION 07-01-14.dwg SHEET 6 WOODS CONSULTING , �>�F�� E6;TIFICATE OF ,�,4 �o�� Ro� ,. S�RE 22 BRIGHTWATER BLUE RESORT DOCKS �� °�A � N#27664 DUNEDIN, FL 34698 �' P� G �' �� PH. (727) 786-5747 g E N T H I C C O N D I T I O N S W I T H Fnx (�2�) �as—�a�s � V�' `� � � � � � : a �55 � W� � � REVISED: 07-01-14 APPROXIMATE DEPTHS : : W' oQm° : w � v `" CONTOURS SHOWN REFERENCE DEPTH (lN F� AT MEAN LOW Wf�TER i.�� Q. ,� Z� 3 0�� 'p� ;,,��j-� O:�C?�� w"�� WATERBODY WIDTH +485� �� ' .. � •'� �! a W"'� �i ♦ _�,.._ WATERFRONTWIDTH ±780' ��i�SS;ONP��, oaF� MHW +o.s5� MLW -�.2a� �w � J ELEVATIONS REFERENCE NAVD-1988 � SCALE: 1"=50' COMMERCIAL DOCKS I Application # C� � C OYSTER DEBRIS/CLUSTERS (APPROXIMATELY 10% VIABLE) � 5 . . .�,y 5 _ 2�� 1:,5.-� � s /�� 1 s S SPARSE TO MEDIUM CUBAN SHOAL GRASS MEDIUM TO DENSE CUBAN „ �SHOAL GRASS 5 I �4 iSi .:; -. : j:•:=. :' :•< :.: , :��-.'�r'-: -��:'=�:�:•:-. -:�-- �; ..- :�� :.:.:.:.:::::: . . . . :;_;: ' �� . .. -r�:�..-: . ......,� .... ...-�..- ��- �..��: . . . . -2�:� OYSTER DEBRISlGLUSTERS ' . (APPROXIMATELY 10% VIABLE) ' Tue, 29 Jul 2014 - 12:46pm F:\PROJECTS1150-180 Brighhvater-Mazas (481-09)\CAD\BRIGHTWATER - FINAL PLANS 05-18-14 - Standard\BRIGHTWATER BENTHIC & FIRE PRO�� w000sTM ONSULE 2NG gRIGHTWATER BLUE RESORT DOCKS ��''�a (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) 5 � ��c:- "��4 14.dwg SHEET 7 DUNEDIN FL 34698 �. •-- c , v � PH. (727j 786-5747 � � ; � �G �i FAX (727) 786-7479 � � • � � � , i ENTHIC CONDITIONS WITH REVISED:07-01-14 APPROXIMATE DEPTHS CONTOURS SHOWN REFERENCE DEPTH (IN F� AT MEAN LOW WATER WATERBODY WIDTH ±485' WATERFRONT WIDTH ±780' MHW +o.ss� MLW -�.za' ELEVATIONS REFERENCE NAVD-1988 #27664 � �No = = . tC � = � ' :W' O� � � :�• . ; ,� -��yo�:: ��,: � � � O� •. � L O_P� ,• � � � �G ♦ �i��`S,S; �N P; ,�� w� >� � o¢�o 0 �o�� w�� aW�� U3�..:. J OQ�IL �w � J u SCALE: 1 "=150' COMMERCIAL DOCKS 5' 5• �-� c c c C5v 5' � C 5� . �� / ? /v � /Q�� o ¢ 5' Application # (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) \ 9��. S 10' V 8' 7' 9' 6' 8' 6' 8' 7' 7' 8' �6' , 7� 6 � 5' 6 �. 4' 8 , 4' g� 7�,5, �'g 2 8' r 6' Tue, 29 Jul 2014 - 12:47pm F:\PROJECTS\150-180 Brightwater-Mazas (481-09)\CAD\BRIGHTWATER - FINAL PLANS 05-18-14 - Standard\BRIGHTWATER BENTHIC & FIRE WOODS CONSULTING 1714 COUNiY ROAD 1, SUITE 22 DUNEDIN, FL 34698 PH. (727) 786-5747 FAX (727) 786-7479 REVISED:07-01-14 BRIGHTWATER BLUE RESORT DOCKS ;�;� � �V BENTHIC CONDITIONS WITH APPROXIMATE = �;� DEPTHS OUT TO CHANNEL = * � CONTOURS SHOWN REFERENCE DEPTH (1N F7) AT MEAN LOW WATER i'0_ WATERBODY WIDTH ±485' WATERFRONT WIDTH ±780' MHW +o.ss� MLW -�.2a' ELEVATIONS REFERENCE NAVD-1988 O� �� ,r��Tp�, �-o�-�a.aw9 SHEET 8 � �.,. Q'�y,_ RTIFICATE OF •� c�u��dO��ON #27664 � = �/�, :w= (�' ' �t/ . STA '2 � . P,�� . � ,cC O Pt�O.�� ♦ ►�i''S;ONp,'��` W� >� � ommm Oo�'m �po�o � a��^ ~ K N N uQ,.� oQF� �w _ J U SCALE: 1 "=15' � MATGN ELEVA7 SEAV COMMERCIAL DOCKS CROSS SECTION A - A' (SEE SHEET 2 FOR CROSS SECTION LOCATION) Application # A' (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) Tue, 29 Jui 2014 - 12:29pm F:IPROJECTS\150-180 Brightwater-Mazas (481-09)\CAD\BRIGHTWATER - FINAL PLANS 05-18-14 - Standard\BRIGHTWATER - REDESIGN 07-01-14.dwg WOODS CONSULTING gRIGHTWATER BLUE RESORT DOCKS .�`¢ � .��. 1714 COUNTY ROAD 7, SUITE 22 DUNEDIN, FL 34698 � �� •� � `' PH. (727) 786-5747 � � ; � � � F,� `'2','86_'4'9 CROSS SECTION � � � � ' REVISED: 07-01-14 A-A' WATERBODY WIDTH ±485' WATERFRONT WIDTH ±780' MHW +o.ss' MLW -�.24' ELEVATIONS REFERENCE NAVD-1988 SHEET 9 #27664 i 0 � � � : • � � x� - _ � � � � �� O�F � �: . '. � : �' ! :�� .,c� O R `OQ, �`�; ��'�i,S�O N A�-��,� �/i�nn�� w� �n a�m—o °a"�m oo�' 300�0 ��u' a'� --� ¢wrr Uavv � J OQF� �w _� u 0 SCALE: NTS COMMERCIAL DOCKS Application # (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) It is the intent of the following construction details to be a reference guide for quality, structural and safety standards. All structures to meet local, and or st�te guidelines for aquatic and marine construction. GENERAL DOCK NOTES: 1. ALL DECKING TO BE TRIMMED, BOTH SIDES. 2. ALL PILINGS TO BE SEATED WITH A FREE FALLING HAMMER IF WATER JETTING IS INSTALLATION METHOD. ALL PILES TO BE TRIMMED SAME HEIGHT. 3. PILING CENTER TO CENTER SPACING ON ALL FIXED DOCKS TO BE 10' NOMINAL. AND NOT TO EXCEED 12'. 4. DOCK FRAMING AND DECKING TO BE CONSTRUCTED USING STAINLESS ST�EL SCREWS (SCREWS TO BE TYPE SPECIFIC FOR MATERIAL UTILIZED). 5. WOOD DECK BOARD SPACING AT TIME OF INSTALLATION NOT TO EXCEED 1/8" TO ALLOW FOR CURING, COMPOSITE DEC14 SPACING NOT TO EXCEED 1/A". 6. ALL DOCK FRAMING OTHER THAN DECKING TO BE MINIMUM GRADE 2 LUMBER. 7. RASP OR FEATHER ALL SAWCUTS. 8. ALL CONSTRUCTION TO MEET OR EXCEED COUNTY REQUIREMENTS LISTED IN SECTIONS 166-(332, 333, & 334) OF THE PINELLP�S COUNTY WATER AND NAVIGATION CONTROL AUTHORITY REGULATIONS MANUAL. 9. CCA WOOD NOT ACCEPTABLE FOR DECKING OR RAILING MATERIALS. WOOD TREATMENT AS FOLLOWS ARE ACCEPTABLE: A,LKALINE COPPER QUATERNARY (ACQ), IF ACQ TREATMENT IS UTILIZED, THEN THE WOOD NEEDS TO BE SEALED WITH AN ENGINEER-APPROVED SEALANT. 10. IF A MAIN DOCK SUPPORT PILING FALLS IN CLQSE PROXIMITY (LESS THAN 2 FEET) TO A BOLLARD PILING REQUIRED FOR A FINGER PIER, THE BOLLARD PILING MAY BE USED FOR BOTH PURPOSES PROVIDING THE CENTER TO CENTER SPANS OF THE DOCK SUPPORT PILINGS DO NOT EXCEED 12 FEET. 11. 5/8" GALVANIZED FASTENERS ARE NOT TO BE USED IN WOOD WITH COPPER AZOLE TREATMENT 12. PILES TO BE WRAPPED FROM THE MUD (SILT) LINE TO 2.0' ABOVE THE MEAN HIGH WATER LINE (MHWL). WITH PRIME HIGH D�NSITY POLYETHYLENE 30 MILS OR .030" THICK 13. ALL WOOD PLANKING WHICH IS TO BE OVER AN AREA OF SEAGRASS, IF PRESENT, SHALL BE NO MORE THAN 8" WID� AND HAVE A MINIMUM SPACING OF NO LESS THAN 1/2" APART AFTER SHRINKAGE. 14. PILINGS TO BE INSTALLED IN AREAS CONTAINING SEAGRASS, IF PRESENT, TO BE INSTALLED BY JETTING WITH A 3" PUMP REDUCED TO A 1-,�'-" (JE7 PIPE), AUGERING AND DRIVING. SHOULD ANY ACCUMULATION OF SEDIMENT OCCUR AT THE BASE OF THE PILING, IT IS TO BE REMOVED FROM THE GRASS AREA. WOODS CONSULTING 1714 COUNTY ROAD 1, SUITE 22 DUNEDIN, FL 34698 PH. (727) 786-5747 FAX (727) 786-7479 REVISED: 07-01-14 PROPOSED DOCK DETAILS WATERBOpY WIDTH f485' WATERFRQNT WIDTH ±780' MHW +0.65� MLW -t.2a� ELEVATIONS REFERENCE NAVD-1988 ELECTRIC CONDUIT PVC WATER LINE UTILITY SECTION VIEW DECK SCREW PATTERN DOUBLE STRINGERS �NTERMEDIATE � STRINGERS ONE SCREW INTO EACH INTERMEDIATE STRINGER LAP JOINT Ik�I cNTS) Ik�I ' '� : :D� •o . . r s ♦ ��- STRINGERSMIN. 4' OVERLAP INTERMEDIATE STRINGER MIN. 2' OVERLAP 12' MAX. O.C. - 10' NOMINAL SPACING O.C. ��!��:a,_ SHEET 10 v . v• . 15586 �� = � �� J` �� : � >� o � �mvm ►� :��'�Q�m � ��,� � -o°� o� o � �� a �'� u� ,,�� U a � n o�w� NQHIL � J U SCALE: NTS COMMERCIAL DOCKS NOTE: IF COMPOSITE DECKING IS USED. O.C. STRINGER SPACING TO BE VIA MANUFACTURES SPECIFICATIONS, NOTTO EXCEED 24" O.C. EITHER 5/4"X6" SAWN � BRAZILIAN HARDWOOD, 2" X 6" PT, OR COMP051TE DECKING 2" X 10" INTERMEDIATE STRINGER MAX. 2.0' O.C. CCA OR ACQ .60 RET. --I� COUNTERSINK ALL BOLTS ADJACENT TO BOAT SLIPS. ALL BOLTING TO BE 5/8" HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED MIN, 5!8" WITH OG WASHERS BACKING BOLT AND NUTS OR 5/8" SS IF ACQ TREATED LUMBER IS USED MINIMUM PILE BENT BRACING: * DEPTHS 8 TO 16 FT. ALL PILE BENTS TO BE CROSS BRACED WITH 2" X 10" #2 S4S CCA 2.5 RET. ONE SIDE ONLY ` DEPTHS >16 FT CROSS BRACING IN SHORT & LONG DIRECTION REQUIRED WITH 2" X 10" #2 S4S CCA 2.5 RET. ONE SIDE ONLY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0\ 2" X 10" #2 S4S CCA 2.5 RET. RACING & BLOCKING Application # (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) � HANDRAIL (WHERE APPLICABLE) STANCHIONS PLACED 5.0' O.C. 2" X 6" � 2" X 4" 42" 2" X 6" STANCHIONS � RAILING TO BE FASTENED TO STRINGERS W/ SHORT BOLT, AND FASTENED TO PILE WITH LONGER BOLT WHEN AVAILABLE ' � DOUBLE STRINGER 2" X 10" 22 DEG MIN #2 S4S CCA OR ACQ .60 RET. 45 DEG MAX 2"' X 10" #2 S4S CCA 2.5 RET. ONE EACH SIDE ALL PILE CAPS & CROSS BRACING TO BE DOUBLE BOLTED AS SPECIFIED I I I r�OTE: �CA TREATED PILES TO BE VINYL WRAPPED FROM MUD (SILT) LINE TO 2.0' MIN 9" TIP PILING 2.5 C.C.A. RET. ABOVE THE MEAN HIGH WATER LINE (MHl/� SET BUTT DOwN, MIN S.o' PENETRATION. WITH PRIME HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE 030 THICK OTE: qECK BOARDS TO BE TRIMMED BOTH SIDES. NOTE: TYPICAL PVIAIN DOCK/WALKOUT ALL INTERMEDIATE STRINGERS TO BE LAP JOINTED AT BENTS 2.0' MIN. LAP JOINT PATTERN FOR DOUBLE STRINGERS A A B B MIN. 4' BETWEEN JOINTS WOODS CONSULTING 1714 COUNTY ROAD 1, SUITE 22 DUNEDIN FL 34698 PH. (727� 786-5747 FAX (727) 786-7479 REVISED: 07-01-14 PROPOSED DOCK DETAILS WATERBODY WIDTH t485' WATERFRONT WIDTH +780' MHW +o.ss� MLW -�za' ELEVATIONS REFERENCE NAVD-1988 , q' , NOM.3' I -�I 0 0 0 0 e o • $ECTION A-A SECTION B-B NAILING PATTERN NAILING PATTERN AT LAP JOINTS FOR DOUBLE STRINGER � � *:� . ; -0 ; ' '. .� . �� jj� �`��i� SHEET 11 ./�'��R. TE OF ' 15586 ; % : � . .. * :# �� ' r o ; •�m�'m r`E`�(JF ,.'��-oovm R�`� P.� �� 3o°w�o . � ,� a � ��t��`�,,, =Q�� A _1x � ` �NQFW-�Q �w _ J � SCA�LE: NTS COMMERCIAL DOCKS RECYCLED PLASTIC CAPS ON ALL EXPOSED PILE TIPS, FASTEN WITH S.S. NAILS (TYP.), CAPS SHOULD BE NO MORE THAN 1!4" LARGER THAN TRIMMED PILE DIMENSION. NOTE: TOP ELEVATION CANNOT BE GREATER THAN 10' ABOVE MEAN HIGH WATER ELEVATION EITHER 5/4"X6" SAWN BRAZILIAN HARDWOOD, 2" X 6" PT, OR COMPOSITE DECKING NOTE: IF COMPOSITE DECKING IS USED. O.C. STRINGER SPACING TO BE VIA MANUFACTURES SPECIFICATIONS, NOT TO EXCEED 24" O.C. COUNTERSINK ALL BOLTS ADJACENT TO BOAT SLIPS. ALL BOLTING TO BE 5/8" HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED MIN, 5/8" WITH OG WASHERS BACKING BOLT AND NUTS OR 5!8" SS IF ACQ TREATED LUMBER IS USED MINIMUM PILE BENT BRACING: * DEPTHS 8 TO 16 FT. ALL PILE BENTS TO BE CROSS BRACED WITH 2" X 10" #2 S4S CCA 2.5 RET. ONE SIDE ONLY ' DEPTHS >16 FT CROSS BRACING IN SHORT & LONG DIRECTION REQUIRED WITH 2" X 10" #2 S4S CCA 2.5 RET. ONE SIDE ONLY �� 0 0 > o— 0 0 0 0 0 a q o 0 0 2" X 10" #2 S4S CCA 2.5 RET. G & BLOCKING Application # (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) ROPH STOPS 2" X 10" If�TERMEDIATE STRINGER MAX. 2.0' O.C. CCA OR ACQ .60 RET. DOUBLE STRINGER 2" X 10" �#2 54S CCA OR ACQ .60 RET. �2" X 10" #2 S4S CCA 2.5 RET. ONE EACH SIDE ALL PILE CAPS & CROSS � BRACING TO BE DOUBLE BOLTED AS SPECIFIED 22 DEG MIN 45 DEG MAX \ NOTE: DECK BOARDS TO BE TRIMMED BOTH SIDES. MIN 8" TIP PILING 2.5 C.C.A. RET. SET BUTT DOWN, MIN 8.0' PENETRATION. NOTE: ALL INTERMEDIATE STRINGERS TO BE LAP JOINTED AT BENTS 2.0' MIN. NOTE: ALL CCA TREATED PILES TO BE VINYL WRAPPED FROM MUD (SILT) LINE TO 2.0' ABOVE THE MEAN HIGH WATER LINE (MHV� WITH PRIME HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE 030 THICK TYPI�AL FINGER PIER NOTE: FINGER PIER PILE BENT AT MAIN DOCK INTERSECTION TO HAVE DOUBLE PILE CAP ON WATERSIDE OF BENT. INTERMEDIATE PILE BENT TO HAVE SINGLE CAP EACH SIDE OF BENT. OUTBOARD PILE BENT TO HAVE DOUBLE PILE CAP ON MAIN DOCK SIDE, NO CAP ON WATERSIDE. WOODS CONSULTING 1714 COUNTY ROAD 1, SUITE 22 DUNEDIN, FL 34698 PH. (727) 786-5747 FAX (727) 786-7479 REVISED: 07-01-14 PROF'OSED DOCK DETAILS WATERBOpY WIDTH ±485' WATERFRONT WIDTH ±780' MHW +o.ss' MLW -�.2a' ELEVATIOMS REFERENCE NAVD-1988 F 'o - = _T� � . . .� '�. SHEET 12 ;ATE OF C No �/lj'.�� .� �SS �, :� � �6� : � � .� . i • �� D 'Q, C �ri� ii��,,• 0 i vm �o�o �� Q w N r UQ�y J OQF'� �w U SCA'LE: NTS COMMERCIAL DOCKS I Application # (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) Prime High Density Polyethylene Specifications for Pile Wrapping Material TYPICAL ASTIUI TEST PROPERTY VALUE METMOD Melt Index 190°C/2.16 g/10 min 0.25 - 0.35 D 1238 Density g/cc 0.955 D 1505 Tensile Strength @ Yield psi 4000 D 638 Elongation % > 600 D 53� Cold Crack Temperature (-76°C) D 746 Flexural Modulus psi 200M D 79q Environmental Stress Cracking F90h 45 D 1693 Underwriter Laboratory flammability rating: 94HB Complies with FDA Regulation 21 CFR 177.1520 NOTE: TOP ELEVATION CANNOT BE GREATER THAN 10' ABOVE MEAN NOTE: ALL CCA TREATED PILES TO BE VINYL HIGH WATER WRAPPED FROM MUD (SILT) LINE TO 2.0' ELEVATION ABOVE THE MEAN HIGH WATER LINE (MHW) WITH PRIME HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE 30 MILS OR .030" THICK � 2.0 FT WOODS CONSULTING 1714 COUNTY ROAD 1, SUITE 22 DUNEDIN FL 34698 PH. (727j 786-5747 FAX (727) 786-7479 REVISED: 07-01-14 C.C.A. 2.5 RET. PILE VINYL PILE WRAPPING DETAILS WATERBODY WIDTH ±485' WATERFRONT WIDTH ±780' MHW +o.ss� MLW -�.2a' ELEVATIONS REFERENCE NAVD-1988 MHW LINE VINYL WRAPPING FROM MUD LINE TO 2.0' ABOVE MHW MUD LINE (Bottom) . �� SHEET 13 B4�Af ArTE OF N o 's': � iss8s� .� f • . . � �•� � �` • • � • ��1 J G�N��`�� t�� g�� o °o�m ��oo ,� �� N^ uQ��. 3� oQ�� NW � J u SCA+LE: AS SHOWN COMMERCIAL DOCKS I Application# (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) WATER LEVEL CpNNECTING RODS FLOAT � � � 5EA ^ LAMINATED FLOOR , VINYL-POLY'ESTER � � 2�� MI FABRIC CHAIN WEIGHTED TYPICAL FLOATING TURBIDITY CURTAINS (CIESIGN BY AER-FLO INC.) NOT TO SCALE TURBIDITY CURTAINS WOODS CONSULTING 1714 COUNN ROAD 1, SURE 22 DUNEDIN, FL 3469B PH. (727) 786-5747 FN( (727) 786-7479 REVISED: 07-01-14 SCALE: 1 "=150' TURBfDITY DETAILS WATERBODY WIDTH ±485' WATERFRONT WIDTH ±780' MHW +o.ss' MLW -�.za� ELEVATIONS REFERENCE NAVD-1988 / / �� SHEET 14 J4� O ��R 1(�11'��TE�OF —�* �` ;T��;�'#�T— ` s' ; *. . . No F';�i'� � �`4g86 � �'Q� �� o � :� _ * �* ¢mm � � : i � : ��o ��, �iO ! • •��/ �,,� Q W N I\ � � i�� G'`�� o � J � ri �� NQ�� \ �U .� .� SCA'LE: 1"=100' COMMERCIAL DOCKS "BE A BETTER BOATER" - ( 3) TOTAL TO BE LAN DWARD-FACI NG AT ENTRANCE TO DOCKS A, C& F DOCK A DOCK B DOCK C . 5 . . 5 . . . 5 . . 5 . . . 5 . . 5 . . �3 .0 29. 3 .0 3 .0 Zg, 3 .0 �3 .0 $9. 3 .0 �.o m mm m mm mm� . ,o o. 0 BRIGHTWATER DRIVE WOODS CONSULTING 1714 COUNIY ROAD 1, SUITE 22 DUNEDIN, FL 34696 PH. (727) 786-5747 FAX (727) 786-7479 REVISED: 07-01-14 DOCK D PROPOSED RESOURCE PROTECTION SIGNAGE WATERBODY WIDTH t485' WATERFRpNT WIDTH t780' MHW +o.s5' MLW -�.2a' ELEVATIONS REFERENCE NAVD-1988 Application # (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) NO CAUTION MOORING SEAGRASS (12 EA.) (1) SIGN EA. TO BE INSTALLED ON BOTH SIDES OF HANDRAILS ON EACH DOCK WALKWAY E DOCK E .o• ° '9° ��n�.a � . DOCK F � �� `� `� ��/ /. \ � � \ _.��, WASn ��iSHEET 15 � `� : No 1559ti : : _ :*- - � • ' ,,,�t � � � �y.r�r .� oF : w�m° . .TA � � Q ," .'• OQ;: `'C',b��o '� . ��., ��. �g�� . Q�� /• i��` �,`` =Q�� U � J w �QF� ` 1\ �U SCAL�E: 1 "=40' COMMERCIAL DOCKS LEGEND EX FIRE EXTINGUISHER (4ACOBC) IN FIBERGLASS CABINET (BY OTHERS) a HOSE BI88 CONNECTION — — POTABLE WATER FIRE MAIN S� 3" FIRE LINE DR9 (200 PSI) UNDER GROUND MIN. 30" BURIAL DOCK A S� S� �- S� Application # (OFFICIAL USE ONLI� N 2" POTABLE LINE SUPPLYING WATER '° E T PEDESTALS s' �DOCKE - 22" FIRE HOSE- CONNECTIONS (WET STANDPIPE) • Sj Sj �� Sj S� FS FS -�- FS FOR EXACT LOCATION OF FDC & UNDERGROUND FIRE LINES SUPPLYING FIRE PR07ECTION TO DOCKS, SEE ATTACHED APPROVED CIVIL SITE PLANS WOODS CONSULTING 1714 COUNTY ROAD 1, SUITE 22 DUNEDIN FL 34698 PH. (727� 786-5747 Fnx (�z�) �ss-�a�s REVISED: 07-01-14 POINT OF CONNECTION � (1)-2" POTABLE LINE W/2" . TRU-UNION BALL VALVE BY SITE CONTRACTOR BRIGHTWATER DRIVE BRJGHTWATER BLUE RESORT DGCKS FIRE & WATER PLAN WATERBODY WIDTH +485' WATERFRONT WIDTH ±780' MHW +o.ss� MLW -�.za� ELEVATION9 REFERENCE NAVD-1988 �� SHEET 16 � �6 T� OF ``�c'� � O ,�58g ��':� �. • �% . � * � � OF . � m � • 'o % .p OQ': w m ,A ` u� u� r� � [`�` •2 F� ••��'� �-�NN �p,� ,/ t'�P,,,,,o�� \ � �u SCALE: 1"=40' COMMERCIAL DOCKS LEGEND EX FIRE EXTINGUISHER (4ACOBC) IN FIBERGLASS CABINET (BY OTHERS) a HOSE 8186 CONNECTION — — POTABLE WATER gj FIRE MAIN . FS DOCK C • FS �_. FS i � 2" POTABLE LINE SUPPLYING WATER �AT PEDESTALS� 2z" FIRE HOSE CONNECTION (WET STANDPIPE FS FS FS FS FS FS POINT OF CONNECTION (1)-2" POTABLE LINE W/2" TRU-UNION BALL VALVE BY SITE CONTRACTOR FOR EXACT LOCATION OF FDC & UNDERGROUN❑ FIRE LINES SUPPLYING FIRE PROTECTION TO DOCKS, SEE ATTACHED APPROVED CIVIL SITE PLANS WOODS CONSULTING 1714 COUNIY ROAD 1, SUITE 22 DUNEDIN FL 34698 PH. (7275 786-5747 FAX (727) 786-7479 REVISED: 07-01-14 Application # (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) \ .,,.. :>x<= .,,: DOCK D _ 3" FIRE LINE DR9 (200 PSI) UNDER GROUND MIN. 30" BURIAL � �`FS` FS ` FS ` FS \ FS POItVT OF CONNECTION `'`s (1)-2" POTABLE LINE W/2" TRU-UNION BALL VALVE BY SITE CONTRACTOR BRIGHTWATER BLUE RESORT DOCKS FIRE & WATER PLAN WATERBODY WIDTH ±485' WATERFROfVT WIDTH ±780' MHW +o.ss� MLW -i.2a' ELEVATIONS REFERENCE NAVD-1988 SHEET 17 FLO� . . FiIGATE OF �G�rySF •� �� a 155g6 •';�,� � �m� � •��vm 0� ; o0 T�� : `°� S P � �� R A�O, 'C?��aW"� • .••'�C� ♦ =�C., � P � ��r � •N��`�`�, °QF� I NW 1� („) SCAL�: 1"=40' COMMERCIAL DOCKS LEGEND EX FIRE EXTINGUISHER (4ACOBC) IN FIBERGLASS CABINET (BY OTHERS) a HOSE BI88 CONNECTION -- POTABL WATER 2" POTABLE LINE — F EMAIN SUPPLYING WATER /1� AT PEDESTALS DOCK 22' FIRE HOSE CONNECTION (WET STANDPIPE) S\F� i FS I F,g ` FS 3" FIRE LINE `FS � FS DR9 (200 PSI) � FS � UNDER GROUND �Fs MIN. 30" BURIAL I \ 22' FIRE HOSE CONNECTION (WET STANDPIPE) Application # DOCK F POINT OF CONNECTION (1)-2" POTABLE LIN� W/2" RU-UNION BALL VAI,VE BY SITE CONTRACTQR FOR EXACT LOCATION OF FDC & UNDERGROUND / FIRE LINES SUPPLYING FIRE PROTECTION TO DOCKS, SEE ATfACHED APPROVED CIVIL SITE PLANS � / WOODS CONSULTING 1714 COUNiY ROAD 1, SUITE 22 DUNEDIN FL 34696 PH. (727� 786-5747 Fnx (�z�) �as-�a�s REVISED: 07-01-14 BRIGHTWATER BLUE RESORT DOCKS FIRE & WATER PLAN WATERBODY WIDTH ±485' WATERFROPIT WIDTH ±780' MHW +o.ss' MLW -i.2a� ELEVATIONS REFERENCE NAVD-1988 / / (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) S� � � � � � ��;��i��t �SHEET 18 �C,�-T7�dICArTE OF : V`�-: �; 5g6 •;�c : .`�' No ,y :, =�r � � � - �K : - o F : W °' : 0 amr ovm �O� c�� Q':�2eado 'A -� �4,' ��5�'0�� i, F �A•• �,�.` W�� ,��' ,NP`��`, �3�� oQ�� J v SCALE: NTS COMMERCIAL DOCKS NOTE: IF COMPOSITE DECKING IS USED. O.C. STRINGED SPACING TO BE VIA MANUFACTURES SPECIFICATIONS, NOTTO EXCEED 24" O.C. EITHER 5/4"X6" SAWN BRAZILIAN HARDWOOD, 2" X 6" PT, OR COMPOSITE DECKING 2" X 10" INTERMEDIATE STRINGER MAX. 2.0' O.C. CCA .60 RET. NOTE: IF COMPOSITE IS USED, STRINGERS TO BE 16" O.C. MAX COUNTERSINK ALL BOLTS ADJACENT TO BOAT SLIPS. ALL BOLTING TO BE 5/8" HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED MIN, 3/4" WITH OG WASHERS BACKING BOLTAND NUTS STAINLESS STEEL RECOMMENDED MINIMUM PILE BENT BRACING: * DEPTHS 8 TO 16 FT. ALL PILE BENTS TO BE CROSS BRACED WITH 2" X 10" #2 S4S CCA 2.5 RET. ONE SIDE ONLY ` DEPTHS >16 FT CROSS BRACING IN SHORT & LONG DIRECTION REQUIRED WITH 2" X 10" #2 S4S CCA 2.5 RET. ONE SIDE ONLY TYPICAL MAIN WALKOUT WOODS CONSULTING 1714 COUNTY ROAD 1, SUITE 22 DUNEDIN F� 34698 PH. (727j 786-5747 Fax (�z�) �es—�a�s ING 2.5 C.C.A. RET. MIN 8.0' PENETRATION. L 2" HDPE (POTABLE) ATTACH TO WOOD BUMPER W/STAINLESS STEEL HARDWARE, 4' �C BRIGHTWATER BLUE RESORT DOCKS REVISED:07-01-14 FIRE & WATER DETAILS WATERBOQY WIDTH t485' WATERFRONT WIDTH ±780' MHW +o.s5� MLW -a.2a� ELEVATIONS REFERENCE NAVD-1988 Application # (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) HANDRAIL (WHERE APPLICABLE) STANCHIONS PLACED 5.0' O.C. 42" RAILING TO BE FASTENED TO STRINGERS W/ SHORT BOLT, AND FASTENED TO PILE WITH LONGER BOLT WHEN AVAILABLE DOUBLE STRINGER 2" X 10" #2 S4S CCA .60 RET. 2" X 10" #2 S4S CCA 60 RET. ONE EACH SIDE ALL PILE CAPS & CROSS BRACING TO BE DOUBLE BOLTED AS SPECIFIED NOTE: ALL CCA TREATED PILES TO BE VINYL WRAPPED FROM MUD (SILT) LINE TO 2.0' ABOVE THE MEAN HIGH WATER LINE (MHV� WITH PRIME HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE 040 THICK. NOTE: DECK BOARDS TO BE TRIMMED BOTH SIDES. N OTE: ALL INTERMEDIATE STRINGERS TO BE LAP JOINTED AT BENTS 2.0' MIN. NOTE: ALL WOOD PLANKING OVER SEAGRASS, TO BE NO MORE THAN 8" WIDE AND HAVE A MINIMUM SPACING OF1/2" APARTAFTER SHRINKAGE. � � � � =L �� N�� SHEET 19 �' TE OF :` y58e � .f : N° � � . * ;W F •W 0 • `f. �P�� ; F � R\�� 1�� • ,. � ♦ .. ��.• � �� _ e nNP_..� � 11 �� m—� �jo�m �p0�0 a�� Q w N r =Q�� u� J OQ�� J u SCALE:�NTS COMMERCIAL DOCKS Application # UNQER DECKING VIEW (Nrs) u u u i B (OFFICIAL USE ONLI� 2' POTABL£ WA7ER L/NE A 7C SEAL SCN. 40 PVC SLE cowouir (WA7ER, QR £LEC.J �o�T SECT/QN B—B LINE EX7RU5/ON TO NAVE PVC SLEEVE lN,9rALLED lN NON-SHRINK GROlJT LINE EXTi4USlON THROUGH SEA W,ALL WOODS CONSULTING BRIGHTWATER BLUE 1714 COUN7Y ROAD 1, SUITE 22 DUNEDIN, FL 34698 R E S O RT D O C KS PH. (727) 786-5747 FAX (727) 786-7479 REVISED:07-01-14 FIRE & WATER DETAILS WATERBOpY WIDTH t485' WATERFRpNT WIDTH t780' MHW +o.ss' MLW -�.2a' ELEVATIONS REFERENCE NAVD-1988 - SHEET 20 �ATE OF �,,Q i •`j�� v r0 ••'� V�,�j : :o h� :v�� • � �.`� ;� � —o ; ao * �t� ; _ � � � Q: �m ,'� .��1'r Q ; 2� p o � `••� O�� AV �'1u � r I� O�a[ �� Qw�r �', �' • c;O `,``! u � .... �►�� oQF� � J v �I SCA�E: 1"=20' COMMERCIAL DOCKS • � a ;" DOCKS A THROUGH F- EACH DOCK WILL HAVE (3) POWER PEDESTALS: (2) PEDESTALS WILL HAVE DUAL 30-AMP RECEPTACLES (EACH SIDE), DUAL 20-AMP GFI RECEPTACLES (EACH SIDE), ACCOMMODATION FOR DUAL � O�. O 2-POLE BREAKERS UP TO 40-AMPS (FOR FUTURE LIFTS) AND (1) PEDESTAL WILL HAVE SINGLE 30-AMP RECEPTACLE, SINGLE 20-AMP GFI RECEPTACLE, ACCOMMODATION FOR SINGLE 2-POLE BREAKER UP TO 40-AMPS (FOR FUTURE LIFT). TRANSFORMER TO SUPPLY ELECTRIC TO DOCKS TO BE INSTALLED PER ELECTRICAL PERMIT OBTAINED SEPARATELY. LOCATION TO BE DETERMINED AT TIME OF ELECTRICAL PERMITTING. Application # 0 0 0 5.0� � �� O � O i:i . (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) N 9U�E o S, o 5.0� I ° 30.0 OI 4. 0 6. 35. 0 67.0 ......_. ..._...._. ,..�.-_._...._......_—__. _........_.__. .___ .._.._ �PROPOSED PROGRESS ENERGY —TRANSFORMER LOCATION. �TO FEED FUTURE DOCK POWER /UNDER SEPARAi � i ERMIT. 1 WOODS CONSULTING 1714 COUNTY ROAD 1, SUITE 22 DUNEDIN FL 34698 PH. (727� 786-5747 FAX (727) 786-7479 REVISED: 07-01-14 s BRIGHTWATER BLUE RESORT DOCKS ELECTRICAL WATERBODY WIDTH ±485' WATERFRONT WIDTH ±780' MHW +o.ss� MLW -�.2a� ELEVATIONS REFERENCE NAVD-1988 r � I SHEET 21 IDA CERTIFICATE OF Id�t��lllqfl #27664 i` ...�� ,j�— � ��'.:Y�•��I w� �p • v '.z n a� �- 6�:2 ,��, "� – ° � 0 O:� oQm� � .�•..1oo�!"m �t � �� a�oo�o Q .��Jlnl� � O� �� • "\\� :(`.� O.' G W N I� �, C� . =QC.., *'`�'.OF�c`' oQ�� R �� Ir � ��''� u 1'R. GVIVVVIJUI DL�: 10040 ru: 1av0� �JJ/ VD/G��1U c'1L U3::Cl� YP'.L� it�l:VK1J1NCi 'L f'HCi�`.i $1.8.50_.D DOC STAMP COLLECTION $4550.00 KEN B'JRKE, CLERK OF COURT PINELLAS COUNTY, FL T3Y DEPUTY CLERK: CLKDM03 "(o.� �'� = 1C :�r . t $`w �� G► �:�5. y S�D� `�' Prepared by and return to: �', ,' _�'--_�i', TRAZElt, HUBBARD, BRANDT, 'TRASK & Xr�tr'.t�V�1�T� g,1LI' _ ' - - - 595 MAIN STREET - ` .� Dunedin FL 3469� ' ' v 727-'133 0494 � � ' ' Pile Number: DELFIl�iO-MELZAsS - - �, � � -- �, ' ,' , ��,�� ` � `�� , �' Parcel Identification No. 08/29/15/04�32/000/03�40 ', �� ; -- , �, ,' -_ __ 'i [Space Above Tiiis Line For Recor 9ing Data] ��' - � , � � � ` � ��.Il°I�°�l.�l�� °�� _, '' (STATUTORl' FORM - SECTION 589.02, F.S.) ` - This ��ndenture made this 26Rh day of �'�bruau��, 20Y0 belw�en T��LF'�Y�IO,��gI I'�t�PlElR1'II�S, ]LLC, a Florida liineted liability corporation whose post office addr<:ss is 61� �. lEg�� di��D, :�,�6ingrton ff3[eiglnts, F]L 60004-26�1 of the County of Cook, State of dilinois, grantor*, and 1�][tIIGgIIT�Y.�'i��]E� ��J.� �S�CBlt�', ]LIL�, , a Florid� ligr►ited liability corporation whose post office address is 2552 �D12E� 5'II'gt`��"'„�4A[� 30P, �Ie�rw�Qer, �']L 33765 of the County of Pinellas, State of Floa�ec➢a, grantee*, �� .' , -- � , �Vltrie�seth that said grantor, for and in consideratio�5 of the sum of;I�I�i AND NO/100 II�LLARS ($10.00) and other good and valuable considerations to said grantor in hanH �aid by sa,id grantee, the ieceipt whereof is hereby acicnowledged, has granted, bargained, and sold to the said grant�e; and gFantee's,l��irs and assigns forever, the following described land, situate, lying and being in Pine�9as Cownty, �'1Q�Qaia; Sd�wiY:. ��-�;�� ILOTS 34 E4ND 35, �aysdde Su6��'�4esiGn'14i'o., 2; mcaoma9in� tothe pda� ��ereof, as a•ecordedl nn PDat IBook 27, Pages 32 - 33, of t9ne 1Pub,IbditeFord�of �'i��l➢as CoenaeQy, �'#oPada. Subject to taxes ffor $D�� andf,�uabseqal�nit years; eover+..ants, co�a➢ertio�s, res�trictuoms, easements, reservations and ifmuta�eo�iso�'�record, if aa�y. and said grantor does he�'e�iy fullyt�srraittti�e tit}s to said land, and wi}I defend the ,�ame against lawful claims of all persons , �, whomsoever. � , � � �� , ,' �� _*_",r_,p�tor" and "Grantee" an: used for singular oc pl iral, as context requires. `� --� Ial �E$IIl�S�, W-li��l'8o$;_grantor has hereunto set grantor's hand and seal the day and year 6rst above written. ,� -_ �`. . `,�� . �.� � � , �_ �' a�a DouhleTimeo .. ..................�-.., .......�. � � ,: y vi ,: . aw a.. . Dr� .L c� o�Y o rv 1 0 li :7 5igned, sealed and delivered in our presence: I 'IlR!I�Ii�,1,1l� , � ..,3% �� ., ,/l= �_ !..,��, � ,� � �� ` .-__ `�', DE FII�T�� BAY PROPIERTIES, LLC, a Florida limitecj `' �-� . li ' ity :orpor 'on ��--, �, � •�, '�' , , �Seal) �` � �� -� �. , CRAIG S. A DER�OrI - - ` � � ' . ,' �`�� ,' ��. . �' ��, ' ,� �� ,� �, -- , ,, ,� -_ � -- �� -' ' --- � , ��, ' �� ` � � '� �. � , _ '. State of Florida � �� County of Pinellas `� �' , , ,�„ �, The foregoing inshument s acknowledged before me thi� .ay �if Febivary, 2D10 by CRAIG S. ANDERSON, Managing MemUer, who is personally knowri cr L] h�s prAduced a�irive lice e as icjentification. �, . ```��Stn�uuri� � � ��, : [NotarySeal] .�� t�� P��i,,, '� '� 4� � \ � ��'a.�,.�p�r�s'.,/f '�� o�r,yPu ic �` • �'� ` , 0212412094 ; :: ; - ,' _ ' �OT�RY PU��IU �: _ Prbnted i�'ame: ; ' Comm�s�iom� ;�"- ; �� :, s'•�.,��aa59�,:, �,. %,, �°q�,� ........, ��Q,�. �- . ��'?��Q�� „`` �� , ,' -' '�,' , �' �, �� , , '� �, � � �, ,� ., �_-�. �, --- � � � - ' - � i� �`��-_ _ ♦ - �\ � `, `, ! � �`� � i � � � Warranty Deed (S�atutory Forn:) - Page 2 My Comnission Expires: DoubleTimeo 1»: LVIVV7V440 nn: lnoro YV: 1LUy�� ufl/u5/[ulU Zt U3:U4 YM� RECORDING 1 PAG�ES $10+00 D pOC STAMP COLLECTION $0.70 KEN BURKE, CLERK OF CUi�RT PINELLAS COUNTY, FL BY DEPUTY CLERK: CLKDMC9 Prepared by and Retum to: Pappas Law & Title 1822 N. Belcher Road Suite 200 Clearwater, Florida 33765 Our File Number: 09-1827 CORREC�IVE SPECIAL �'AitItA1�IT�' IDEIC➢➢ i ' �� ____ 1 � - - � ' -__ � - . _ � � . .v, Parcel No. 0�-29-15-04932-000-0360; 0390; 0400; 0410; 0420; 0430; 0450 �,�� '' . — Tor ofGcial wse bv Clerlc°s offkice onlv �`� ' ---- --- - - + � � -- �� STATEOFFIorida � . ��,'� �� .�`, COiJNTY OF Pinellas ) � ; `� �� ' ) ` � � ' ! THIS INDENTURE, made this April �, 2010, between, Sam Karamountzas and Bi11 W. Mazas, whose mailing �ddce�sis �\��--�/� 2551 Drew Street, Suite 301, Cleazwater, FL 33765 , party of tlie first part, and Brightwater Blue Res�rt, LLC, a Florida LiYni��ed �� '-' Liability Company, whose mailing address is: 2551 Dr.ew Street, Suite 301, Clearwater, PL 33765, party/parties of the secbNl paR, �� WITNESSETH: � � , First party, for and in consideraHon of d�e sum of TEN AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($10.00) az d other valuable consid2:�a�ie�s, ,��,' receipt whereof is l�ereby acknowledged, does hereby grant, bargain, sell, aliens, remises, releases, conveys and confirms unto ;ecos�d _,' party/parties, hisA�er/Uieir l�eirs and assigns, the following.described property, Gowit: (Flamingo Bay) Lots 36, 37, 38, 39, and 40 BAYSIDE SUBDIVISION NO. 2, according to tl�e plat tliereof,a� reocrded�i� `� Plat Book 27, Pages 32 and 33, ofthe Public Recorsd of Pinellas Cow�ty, Florida. � �; � and � ` ' � � (Cinnamon Bay) � ' Lots 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, and 4G BAYSIDE SUBDIVISION NO. 2, accordingsathe p7�t ttlere��as�\ eocrded in Plat Book 27, Pages 32 and 33, of die Public Recorsd of Pinellas Counfy,,.Fiocida. `� �> � � � THIS DfiED HAS BEEN CREATED TO CORRECT THE NP;ME OF'�HE GRAN'I'�� AS�SHOWN ]N � THE DEED RECORDED ]N O.R. BOOK 16853, PAGE 531, OI' THI� P�IBLIC REGOl2D5 OP PINELLAS COUNTY, FLOR[DA. � . � � THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROPERTIES ARE NOT THE f�61�ESTEAD �OF THE GRANTOR�. Subject, however, to all covenants, conditions, restri¢tions, resyrvations,Y�atft�tions, easement, and to all applicable.zoning ordinances and/and restrictions and prohibitions imposed �� govertgr�ental autlinritie'S, if any. TOGETHER with all tlte tenements, hereditart��i�(s'and ap,pur[enances thereto belonging or ir 3nywise apFertaining. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same in fe� �iufple foCever. � AND tfie party of ihe first part I�ereby coYen�nts wi�Kg�id parlry� o�the second part, that it is lawfully seized of said laod in fee simple: that it has good riglit and lawCul authority tb,sell,ai�ki'convey se�id land; that it hereby fully w.rrants the title to said I,md and will defend the same against the lawful clairps-of a]j pe?sons daiming by, throu�,6 or under the party of �he first part. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, fus4par[y has sigpedAniisealed [hese present the date se[ forth on April �, 2010. . � � � Signed, sealed and delivered � ' � � `�' � �� in the resence of: '� � , � �� , � C,CP,�=-o � - � � / ime s si atur \ � ' " � _ �4� �� `� `� Sam I;aramountz�s I w�m�a[llie � � �� ,� Pnnt w� � � i � , i State of Florida County of Pinellas �_b � ;. Bi•1 \V. Mazas THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT was acknowledged before me this � day of April, 2010 b� Sam Karamountzas and Bill W. Mazas who is personally kt�own to me or who has produced a PHOTO iD as identification. � NOTARY PUBLIGST��TE ON PLORIDA Nota Publ' .� �. ''•.,1Yacy A. �Iudson Naylor My Commission Expires: = ��oa # DDIi10834 ,,,,,�•° Expires: NOY. Ol, 2010 BONDBD TNRtI NW�T1C BONDIN(i C0.� 1N6 Notary Seal DEED - Spccial Warra�riy Dced - Cotparale �''t,��nt:vc 8r DE��E�ot��r:vr J�ine 10, 2014 Richard J. Marcel 1'he Sustainability Group 6320 Rowan Road New Port Richey, 34653 C��'� I'I� � O F C L E A R� A� T' E R � Posr Of�r•�cE T3os 474�3� CLf•.e1R\w`a\TER� FwKw,� 3375�-4748 MI.).�11(91:1L SF.RVI(:Gti BL�tLDWC,� Za0 SUiJTH �1Y11TLE.l�V.i•:Afl:l'� CLI:ARIC?,l'PEIi, F'tOIiIIJr� 3377G ' TELFYH()tiF. �%�%� �6�-r:s�% ��-� (727� 762-48G5 It�: Develo�ment Order - C�s'e FLS2014-04Q07 —150 Brightwater Drive Dear Mr. iVlareel: This letter constitutes a Development Order p,ursuatrt to Conununity D�velopm�nt Code (CDC) Section 4-202.E. On May O1, 2U14, the Developnnent Revietiv Committ�e (DRC) reviewecl yuur req�est for Flexible Standard Uevelopmerrt application to perrnit 30 R�sort Attached D�velling units in the Tourist ( i') District pursuant to Gomxnunity Development Code Section 2-802.Q. "['he DR� reco�tnended approval of the application rvith th� following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law: �'indin�s o1':I+'act: 1. That the 2.07 acre subjec�t property is locat�d on ihe north siri� oF Brightwater Drive, approximately 800 feet east of �-Iamden Drive; 2. Tl�at the subject pxoperty is located wilthin the Taurist (T) District �nd the Resort Facilities High (RFH) Future Land Use I'lan category; 3_ That ihc subject praperty is 1�cated in �t�e Beacla hy Design Small Motel District; 4. Th�t the site is currentiv vacant; 5. Th2t the pmposal is to construct 3Q r�sort attached dwellin�s and six dacks each havin� tive slips for a total of 30 slips; 6. Thei the units will be divicled between �ix buildings with parking an the graund floor and two floors of livin� space above; 7. That `70 off.-street par�7ng spa�es are pr°oposed where 45 are required; and 8. That fhere are no active Code'Complia�nce cases for the subject prop�rty. Conclusio�s of Law: 1. Thai the developrnent proposal is con�istent wifh the Standards as pter Tables 2-80.1.1 and 2- 802 of the Cammunity Development Code; 2. That the develogment praposal i� consistent �vith the Flexibility �riteria as per Secfion 2- 802.Q c�f the Community Dev.elopment Code; anci .i ; �" � �'�'."��z5�fi'. .. .l� 'I('�'1�I' .'il.• . I:'.! . .,,. FLSZOia-oaoo� l50 Brightwater Drive Page 2 of 3 3. T1iat the development proporal :is corbsis�ent with the �eneral Stanc�ards for i,evel �ne Apprdvals as pex Section 3-9I�+.A of the !�ommunity D�velopment Co�3e. I concur with 1:he findings of tY�� l�e�jelo�ment R:.vie�� Comgnittee arad, tkzrough this letter, APPR�i�� your application far Flexible St�ndard Devel�,�ment wi�h �he fall�wing conditions: sCo�adx��ons �f ��mrovap: 1. T'hat the final design of the pa:lcir�g lot be generally co*�sis�ent with tnE dra�vin;s a�proved by the DR�C; 2. That issuance of a developmeat permit �y the City of ��lear��ater does not in aaly way create any right on the part of an applicant to obtain a perrnit froan a state o� %deral agency and �loes not create any liability o:i the part oF the City for issuar3ce of the pei��ii if the appiicant fails to oUtain requisite 3ppr��vals �r iulfill the obl�;;ataoi�s ii�,posec� Q�y a state or fec3eral agency or undertalces actions lhat resuEt an a vioiation of state or feder��l law; 3. That all �iher applicable local, st�;te andi`ar f�deral pe�r�aits �e obtained before cus�uneiacement of the e�evelopment; 4. Tl�al application for a buildin; perra�it be subanit�ec� a�o late�- than Ju�,� ]:0, 2dIS unless tirne exterisiuns are gratated pursua-►t tc� CI)C �ection �-407; 5. "I'hat prior to tl�e issu�nce dFa;iy buildin� permits, op�;x� space/ r�crea#�on fees be p�id; b. Th�t prior #o the issuanee of any h�uildi.ng perrnits, �;-•e landscape �laia m�ast �e�ect that all shaile trees be p3antecl at a niinir�um of �ve ieel .from =ry impervnous area; 7. That prior to tlte issuance or' any builc.laaig perar.i�s, t�.e Fire I>e�aitment may require the provision of a Water Stcid'y pe;%ra��1 by � L'ire �'�otec �.ifln Eragi�eer ar� c�rder to ensure that an ade;��uate water supply is av�ilable an�i. to deterrraine if aia_y upgratles are �eq�ired �y the developer due to the impact o£ tl�e project. `9'he wat.�r sup�l_y nnust be able tu support 4:he rieeds of any rec�uired P�re sp�-itllcler, stanc�pipe a.nd/or �ire pu�np. If ri di�e pump is requirecl, then the water supply must be able to sF�r�ply 150 percent of its rated capacity. This ap��roval is basecl upon, and must adhere to �he appl�r,ataon anc� c�evelopznent pl�sas reeeived April Ol, 20�� and June 06, 2014. Pursuant to �D�:' Section 4-303, at1 ar�plication for a bui'sdin;; perrni2 si?all be gnade withaa� �ne year of the Flexible SCandarcl Developmexl'� approval {by June 10, 2�15). 'I'�e building pe�mit musi be obtai►ir d �vithin si:� mor.t}�s of' the initiaP permiY apg�lica�ion. Tli�s time frame to obtain the initial building �ermik may be extended far an aCaitg�nal six m��ifk�s far cause by the Cornm�unitv Development �oord'nator. Tir.ne frames do not ch�ge with su^cessive owners. All required certi�rates of occupancy i�usF t�e obtarned ��viil°:in t��c� years of the date of issuance of the building permit. �he issuance of this .I�evelopme7t �3rder does nat rzY:eve you of the nea�ssity �o obtain builciing permils or pay impact fees ihat rnay be ree�uire�l. Ici orde� to facilifi.ate th�� issuance of any pennit or license alfected by this approval, pleas� �c�ing a ��py c:'this �etter ruitl� yau �vhen applying for any permits or license. FLS201�-010U7 150 Brightwater Drive Page 3 0�3 If you have any questions, please do not hesitate tn c:all R✓�att 3acl:.so�, �'1aau�er Iig, at 72'7-562- 4504 or via ernail at matthew�jacicson ,v,�vcleaxwater.co�n. Sincerely., . �` Michael Dellc, AICP Plaruling and Deve�op�nent �7arector