REZ2014-08003� �l�a���
���
�
MEETING DATE:
AGENDA ITEM:
CASE:
REQUEST:
GENERAL DATA:
Agent... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
Appl icant / Owner ..............
Location... .
Property Size
ANALYSIS:
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
10-21-2014
F.1.
REZ2014-08003
To amend the Zoning Atlas designation from Low Density Residential (LDR) to
Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR).
Larry Mills
Sunstream Lane Development, LLC
2854 Sunstream Lane, located approximately 160 feet west of Parkstream
Avenue, south of Saber Drive, and north of Lake Chautauqua Park.
11.462 acres, more or less
Site Location and Existing Conditions:
This case involves an 11.462-acre, more or less, property located on
the south side of Sunstream Lane, approximately 160 feet west of
Parkstream Avenue. The parcel, addressed as 2854 Sunstream Lane,
is owned by Sunstream Lane Development, LLC and is currently
vacant.
Request:
The request is to change the property's Zoning Atlas designation of
Low Density Residential (LDR) to Low Medium Density
Residential (LMDR). Both the current district (Low Density
Residential) and the proposed district (Low Medium Density
Residential) are consistent with the underlying future land use map
classifcation of Residential Low (RL); therefore, no future land use
map amendment is required. The applicant has submitted a
Preliminary Plat for a 28-lot subdivision to be processed if this
rezoning is approved. The applicant understands all necessary
approvals and permits must be obtained before development of the
subject site occurs.
� (���'� � � �_ ^ w`- -� vf
��
_� _ �� � �I , ,�� i
� i•.' � ; J IJ. �� � IS__1
,
r��, �� �`,+ ��; �i �` � jU, j �
y � �.._.. � 511 OR V W�
� I , ,
1=�
.,� :. 1°�,.�- J` � i� a l
�,;y v � �
/� � HIILCREEKCIRSJ /
� /
- =�� �'� PROJECT I i
; ���_i -�,
�P — - :-i
'F�' J� � _.
,�'a,�p, �.
�P h S
�,:
LOCATION MAP
F.1.
� l��e[ii 11' alLl Level III Zoning Atlas Amendment Application Review
,.�i-� ��, r�Mi . .. .
�:����r�r_�� ��� , ., ``�'�"� � �
Vicinity Characteristics:
The property is surrounded by single family homes to
the north and to the east. To the south is Lake
Chautauqua Park, and to the west are Lake
Chautauqua and a single family home.
Approximately 1330 linear feet, or 33 percent of the
perimeter property boundary, abuts properties with a
Zoning Atlas designation of Open Space/Recreation.
The remainder abuts properties zoned Low Medium
Density Residential (LMDR), Low Density
Residential (LDR), Preservation (P) and Agricultural
Estate Residential (A-E) (Pinellas County) (see Figure
1 below).
Abutting Zoning Atlas
Designations
26% 33%
�%
17%
Figure 1
■ Open Space/Recreation
OS/R
Low Medium Density
Residential (LMDR)
■ Low Density Residenl
(LDR)
� Preservation (P)
■ Agricultural Estate
Residential (A-E)
(Pinellas County)
A complete listing of the surrounding land uses,
Future Land Use Map designations and Zoning Atlas
designations are shown in Table 1 below.
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
LONG RANGE DIVISION
Community Development Board — October 21, 2014
REZ2014-08003- Page 2 of 7
� vi�.i�l 17 �ll.l Level III Zoning Atlas Amendment Application Review PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
� . .... ..s�_;ax�v�_._ ..��... . � .
LONG RANGE DIVISION
Table 1. Surrounding Future Land Use and Zoning Designations
Direction
Existing Use(s) FLUM Designation Zoning Atlas Designation
North: Sin le Famil Residential Residential Low RL Low Densi Residential LDR
East: Single Family Residential Residential Low (RL) Low Medium Density
Residential LMDR
South: City Park (�OSj ion/Open Space Open Space/Recreation (OS/R)
Lake Chautauqua, Single Preservation (P) Water Preservation (P), Agricultural
West: Family Residential Residential Low (RL) � Estate Residential (A-E)
Pinellas Coun )
REVIEW CRITERIA:
No amendment to the Zoning Atlas shall be recommended for approval or receive a final action
of approval unless it complies with the standards contained in Section 4-602.F, Community
Development Code. Table 2 below depicts the consistency of the proposed amendment with the
standards as per Section 4-602.F:
Table 2. Consistency with Community Development Code Standards
F.1 The proposed amendment is consistent with and features X
the goals, policies and objectives of the Comprehensive
Plan and furthers the purposes of this Development Code
and other city ordinances and actions designed to
implement the plan.
F.2 The available uses to which the property may be put are X
appropriate to the property which is subject to the
proposed amendment and compatible with existing and
planned uses in the area.
F.3 The amendment does not conflict with the needs and X
character of the neighborhood and the city.
F.4 The amendment will not adversely or unreasonably affect X
the use of other property in the area.
F.5 The amendment will not adversely burden public X
facilities, including the traffic-carrying capacities of
streets, in an unreasonably or disproportionate manner.
F.6 The district boundaries are appropriately drawn with due X
regard to locations and classifications of streets,
ownership lines, existing improvements and the natural
environment.
Community Development Board — October 21, 2014
REZ2014-08003- Page 3 of 7
' vi��l Tl� til�l Level III Zoning Atlas Amendment Application Review PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
LONG RANGE DMSION
RECOMMENDED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:
Consistency of Development with the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan and Community
Development Code and Regulations [Sections 4-602.F.1]
Recommended Findings of Fact:
Applicable goals, objectives and policies of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan which support
the proposed amendment include:
Goal A.1.1.3 Environmentally sensitive wetlands subject to Department of Environmental
Protection (DEP) jurisdiction and the jurisdictional wetlands of the Southwest Florida Water
Management District (SWFWMD) shall be designated by "Preservation" (P) zoning and
prevented from being built upon except as permitted by the Preservation Zoning District.
Goal A.2 A sufficient variety and amount of Future Land Use categories shall be provided to
accommodate public demand and promote infill development.
Goal A.2.2.2 Residential land uses shall be sited on well-drained soils, in proximity to parks,
school, mass transit and other neighborhood-serving land uses.
Goal A.4 The City shall not permit development to occur unless an adequate level of service is
available to accommodate the impacts of development. Areas in which the impact of existing
development exceeds the desired levels of service will be upgraded consistent with the target
dates for infrastructure improvements included in the applicable functional plan element.
Policy A.6.2.1 On a continuing basis, the Community Development Code and the site plan
approval process shall be utilized in promoting infill development and/or planned developments
that are compatible.
Recommended Conclusions of Law:
The request does not conflict with the goals, objectives and policies of the Clearwater
Comprehensive Plan and furthers said plan as indicated in the following. The proposed Low
Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District is compatible with the single family residential
uses. The subject site borders Lake Chautauqua Park, and is also in close proximity to Westfield
Countryside Mall (1 mile), McMullen Booth Middle School (0.85 miles), as well as other
neighborhood-serving uses (i.e. grocery stores and restaurants to the northwest, west, and
southwest). In addition, the proposal does not degrade the level of service for public facilities
below the adopted standards (a detailed public facilities analysis follows in this report). The
portion of the property that is zoned Preservation (P) will remain as such, and will see no
development.
Compatibility with Surrounding Property/Character of the City & Neighborhood [Section
4-602.F.2, 4-602.F.3 and Section 4-602.F.4]
Recommended Findings of Fact:
Existing surrounding uses consist of single family homes, a city park, and a lake. The Zoning
Atlas designations of surrounding properties include Low Density Residential (LDR), Low
Medium Density Residential (LMDR), A-E, Agricultural Estate Residential (Pinellas County),
Preservation (P), and Open Space/Recreation (OS/R).
Community Development Board — October 21, 2014
REZ2014-08003- Page 4 of 7
� C�l.tLl !'!' �L�t Level III Zonin Adas Amendment lication Review PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
9 �p IANG RANGE DIVISION
. ., . t��.. . . . �.
The proposed Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District primarily permits residential
uses. The intent of the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District is to protect and
preserve the integrity and value of existing, stable residential neighborhoods of low to medium
density while at the same time, allowing a careful and deliberate redevelopment and
revitalization of existing neighborhoods in need of revitalization or neighborhoods with unique
amenities which create unique opportunities to increase property values and the overall
attractiveness of the City.
The proposed Zoning Atlas designation will allow infill development of the subject property to
take place. A low medium density residential use will serve as an appropriate transition from the
lower density residential areas to the north and east and to the open space use to the south,
adding to the appeal of the neighborhood and overall attractiveness of the City.
Recommended Conclusions of Law:
The proposed Zoning Atlas designation is in character with the overall Zoning Atlas designations
in the area. Further, the proposal is compatible and consistent with the uses and character of the
surrounding properties and neighborhood in the vicinity of the subject property.
Sufficiency of Public Facilities [Section 4-602.F.5]
Recommended Findings of Fact:
To assess the sufficiency of public facilities needed to support potential development on the
property, the maximum development potential of the property under the present Future Land Use
Map designation and the present and requested Zoning designation were analyzed. Even though
this is a Zoning Atlas amendment application, maximum development potential is based on the
underlying future land use, so for purposes of this analysis, sufficiency of public facilities is
based on the Future Land Use Map designation.
In this instance there is no change to the Future Land Use Map, and both the current Low
Density Residential (LDR) District and the proposed Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR)
District primarily permit residential uses. Since there is no change to the Future Land Use Map
designation nor a change of use, there is no change to the development potential (i.e., dwelling
units per acre or floor area ratio) as shown in Table 3.
Community Development Board — October 21, 2014
REZ2014-08003- Page 5 of 7
Y C��til �Y{iL�l Level III Zonin Atlas Amendment A lication Review PLANNING& DEVELOPMENT
9 pp LONG RANGE DIVISION
� .. _..� : . .. .
Table 3. Public Facilities Level of Service Analysis
Net Capacity
Chan e Available?
Public Facility/Service Cunent Low Density Requested Low Medium
Residential (LDR) Density Residential
District (LNIDR) District
S units er acre 5 units er acre
Streets 573 Trips 573 Trips 0 Yes
Potable Wate 14,842 GPD 14,842 GPD 0 Yes
Wastewate 13,358 GPD 13,358 GPD 0 Yes
Solid Waste 144.5 Tons/Year 144.5 Tons/Year 0 Yes
Parkland 0 Acres 0 Acres 0 Yes
Notes:
1. Based on average daily trips per acreage figure, Pinellas County Countywide Plan Rules.
• Residential Low (RL) — 50 vehicle trips per day per acre.
2. Analysis based on utilization rates of 260.4 GPD/unit for potable water and 234.36 GPD/unit for wastewater;
5,069.441bs/year/unit for solid waste.
3. GPD — Gallons per day.
4. Based on 4.0 acres of arkland er 1,000 ersons and 2.2 ersons er unit.
The Trip Generation Compaxison by Zoning Atlas Designation in Table 4 below indicates the
estimated trip generation for specific uses allowed in the current and proposed zoning districts
based on the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip Generation 9`h Edition. There is
no change in the maximum number of units that could be built since the Future Land Use is not
being amended. However, because the property is currently vacant, there would be an increase
of up to 545 average daily trips and an increase of 58 PM peak trips if the parcel were built to its
maximum development potential.
Table 4. Trip Generation Comparison by Zoning Atlas Designation
Avg. Net Change PM Peak Net
Development PM Peak Change
Land Use potential Daily Avg Daily Trips Avg Trips PM Peak
Trips Trips Rate Tri s
Existing Designation: Low Density Residential (LDR) District
Vacant 0 units 0 N/A 0.00 0 N/A
Single Family Residential 57 units2 545 N/A 1.01 58 N/A
(9.57 tri s/unit)
Proposed Designation: Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District
Single Family Residentiall 57 units2 545 545 1.01 58 58
(9.57 trips/unit)
Abbreviations and Notes:
N/A = Not Applicable. SF = Square Feet GFA = Gross Floor Area
1. Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip Generation 9th Edition Land Use 210.
2. Total dwellin units ermitted b the underl in RL Future Land Use Ma cate o is 5 units er acre.
Community Development Board — October 21, 2014
REZ2014-08003- Page 6 of 7
a C�I�Nl fl'�ll.l Level III Zonin AdasAmendment licatlon Review PL^rINING&navFLOrMExT
J �'�PP LONG RANGE DIVISION
U . n.... � 0 3"'E�•• �.� � .
Recommended Conclusions of Law:
Based upon the findings of fact, it is determined that the additional traffic generated by the
proposed amendment will not result in the degradation of the existing level of service on
Enterprise Road. This segment of Enterprise Road is currently operating at a Level of Service C,
which is above the adopted roadway level of service standard. There will be an increase in
demand for potable water and generation of wastewater and solid waste, but there is adequate
capacity to accommodate the maximum demand generated by the proposed amendment.
Furthermore, parkland and recreation facilities will not be affected by the proposed amendment.
Location of District Boundaries [Section 4-602.F.6]
Recommended Findings of Fact:
The location of the proposed Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District boundaries is
consistent with the boundaries of the subject property. The proposed Low Medium Density
Residential (LMDR) District is compatible with the single family residences to the north and
east, and to the park to the south.
Recommended Conclusions of Law:
The district boundaries are appropriately drawn in regard to location and classifications of
streets, ownership line, existing improvements, and the natural environment.
REVIEW PROCEDURE:
Approval of the Zoning Atlas amendment does not guarantee the right to develop the subject
property. The property owner must comply with all laws and ordinances in effect at the time
development permits are requested, including transportation concurrency provisions of the
Concurrency Management System in Division 9, Community Development Code.
RECOMMENDATION:
Based on the foregoing, the Planning and Development Department recommends the following
action:
Recommend APPROVAL of the request for Zoning Atlas amendment from the Low Density
Residential (LDR) classification to the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) classification.
Prepared by Planning and Development Department Staff�/�--- �� c-�
Kyle Brotherton
Planner II
ATTACHMENTS: Resume
Photographs of Site and Vicinity
Community Development Board — October 21, 2014
REZ2014-08003- Page 7 of 7
Kyle Brotherton
3660 E Bay Dr. Apt 211 � Largo, FL 33771
(330) 687-7397 � kyle.brotherton@myclearwater.com
Education
The Ohio State University, Graduated December 2013
• Bachelor of Science in City and Regional Planning, 3.014 Major GPA
Experience
City of Clearwater
Clearwater, FL � June 2014 - Present
Planner II
• Assist residents with annexing into the City, use appropriate software to track the workflow
• Review current and future land use maps
• Research and review comprehensive plans and special use districts
The Men's Wearhouse
Columbus, OH ( March 2014 - May 2014
Customer Service Associate
• Assisted wedding parties with booking of rental tuxedos and styles, took measurements of those needing fitted
• Sold customers on the benefits of enrolling into the "Perfect Fit" rewards program
City of Bexley
Bexley, OH � June 2013-August 2013
Planning Intern
• Created a redevelopment plan for the Livingston Avenue Area using InDesign, Photoshop, and SketchUp
• Recommended policy changes, implementation steps, four development scenarios, and zoning changes
• Predicted potential increases in tax revenue over current t� revenue for each scenario
Skills
Software: MS Office, Adobe Creative Suite 6: Photoshop, InDesign, Illustrator, Trimble: SketchUp
Planning: Complete Streets, Comprehensive Planning, Urban Planning, Mixed Use, Planned Unit Developments
Projects
Healthy Food Access Studio
Columbus Public Health Department, Columbus, OH
• Created a plan to help provide better access to healthy food within under-served neighborhoods
• Interviewed convenience store owners to determine if residents had access to healthy foods
• Helped with final compilation of the plan to present to the health department using InDesign
Canal Winchester Comprehensive Plan Studio
Canal Winchester, OH
• Gathered public input, researched existing conditions and market trends
• Created a plan to better connect the historic downtown to the new suburban development
• Lead the final production of the plan utilizing InDesign for the presentation to city members
Personal Websites
Website: www.kyleebrotherton.wix.com/kb-resume-portfolio
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/kyle-brotherton/Sa/306/a54
�� ,�
�_
�
;,.
; 1 ",4;
.��
;; �, �� ay,�
y `'�`:�`�"�
, ...,,�. .
._�. ..
� r�� ., . _
:r
, ss,� '±�:' i
4.
View looking west at the subject property, 2854 Sunstream Lane
. er f �,_, . ,
i'
' �.
� ���s{�y� , ,�i', .�� , �
,, .,�;�.� p�.
�����` .
View looking south of the subject property
-- -
— ___�_
-- ---�-
_�_..�.�..rr,'
���-�
.. . _
�.:: :. `:"�� � . _.a
.�.� :�..�,�.
� C
��`4 ��,�. , . yi�i.
.,f�: �.. . �a9�
t,;:
��� ���'4ii '4j ^.: T�`k �'li� ,
..:'� � �� _. ,. • � l ��:t, �Y' . . , ��h+. .<,�i
View looking north of the subject property
�;
us
ai.� M �; fr,.., �
`YFh�"..i'�. ..9� '! ., r�
� .x r,
� . . q�� ,.a"�� �-�. "t � ...14 � �� ��, ,. _ �
Adjacent property to the southeast of the subject property
��Yi
�.. ... - . ., . t
.,,. .. . .. �. , .!i�.M � ... � . ,, n`u��a, A` fi:' `�v"�:.... ...c.... ..t"i.� b ..,r'1.w..t.._:;:�5'!S _�.1.s.�. "{y
Adjacent property to the northeast of the subject property View looking easterly along Sunstream Lane
REZ2014-08003
Sunstream Lane Development, LLC
2854 Sunstream Lane
. � �
° Cl�a�ater
u �'��'`�'^�.: '~� ��^ :...�.r
��-�.� �,..��.,-�� y �H.,o
Planning & Development Department
�c�ning Atlas Amencim�nt Application
ALL APPUCATIC?N5 AitE TO BE �ILLEQ QUT a30MRLET'EtY At+�p CORR�CTI.Y, ANO SUBNIItTED IM PERSQN {MO �AX OR
DEt,NER1ESj lii TtiE P'LANNING 8� DEYELORMENT DEPARTMENT BY NOON ON THE SCtIEDULED DEADUNE DA't'E,
A 7't)TAL !�f 11 C4MPLETE SETS O� APPLlCA71QN MATERIALS �l QRiGINAI AND 10 GOPiE5j AS REttUIREt1 WRHiN ARE TO
BE SUBMtiTED FQR REVlEW' BY TNE QEYEWPMENT REVE�W GQMMRTEE. suBS�ctU�vr sv��nrrrn�. Foa r��
CCtMMUNITIf �EVEIOi�M�iV� B(�AItD Will REQUIRE 15 CCiM�t�TE 5ET5 CiF APPtlCAT10N MA'M'E1tWLS {i C1RiGINAt ANO
i4 t�VlESj. PLA�iHS ANO Al�PLKATIONS ARE REQWRED TQ 8E G�.ATED, SiAPLED ANQ FOLLlEO iNT4 SE7'S.
iT 15 #NCUMBENT UPON TNE APPUCANT Tt� SllBMR COMPLETE AND COR#tECT lNI�ORMATlON. ANY MISt.EADING,
DECEPTM/E. iNC4MPLETE OR lNCORIfECT INFGRMA110N MAY INVAL{tyA� YOUR APPUCAt10N.
'1'HE Af'�LiG►N"f, 8Y FIUN6 TNtS APPUCATK}N, AGR6ES TO CQMPCY WITH Ali. APPLiCA6LE REQUiREMENTS OF TME
CUMMUNRY QEVEtOPMEM' COOE.
APPUGATWtV F£Et
PR�OPERTY OWNER�S)
{PER OEED):
MAtUNG ApQRESS:
PN{iNE NUMBER:
$77S Rezflni� Oniy
SO if submftied c�curfently with corresponding �uture i.and Use
Map l�nerulment {FtUM ,4rnendmen# fec indusive af reza��ngj
fMAit: � cna �hofimaii.{Y"ii'1'1
���rro����s��vtArn�: Terence M. M
�un�G ►ao�as.
piiC3NE NUMBER:
€MAtL:
A�W�E$S OF SUBJEC;i'
PR4PER1Y�if8pplicabi@j: '^-s�'U�1St1"�8ti1 '.artla{�9V�5�01'i
��L �u�s��tsl. 32-�8-1f�-t30000-130-01Q0
tf� t�Rt��: � i�z +� �w it4 c� r�� �a o� s�c �z•zs-s,� �ss w��o �r a� w�ot►�r �mc:�a� s� �ss r�aT
PAR7 AESC C�qM NW COR OF SW 314 t� NE 1J4 Of SEC 7?1 SOOt?Q2'36"W 36ttFi 7H 588043`26"E
154.b�FT F�R PQB iii 589D43'28"E 236.b5FF TH 56+4029'01`W 91.321=T TH S;SD42"43"W
iW.Q3FT TH N82W6'40"YV 33.+t2FT7H N43pSW1'551"W 29.SOF7 7N IV�Q1C'32"E 4Q.70FT TO POB
rt�asar� �e r�q+u�� R r n i LD r
�n�oM�rvr: r` i n. t ivi i• un Sc�bd vision
�� a►r.�,++,�w� !a*n.�tm«K, �ao a Myr�a �►w�u.. �. �t, �r�, Y.�: rxr-a+�.�ser: i�.�: r�rr.�-�aas
a�. � ara +�.�.a o��
.?`�•_� _
�.�1
-� �%� � .
` ����a �
Planning & Development Deparnnent
Zoning Atlas Amendment Application
PLEASE fNSURE 'fHAT THE FOLLOWING INFORMA710N IS EILLED OU'1', IN ITS ENTIRETY. FAILURE TO COMPLETE THIS
FORM WILL RESULT 1N YOUR APPLICATION BEING FOUIVD INCOMPLETE AND POSSIBLY DEFERRED UNTIL THE FOLLOWING
APPLICA710N CYClE.
FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATION
PRESENr: Preservation/Residential Low
REQUESTEO: Preservation/Residential Low
ZONING DISTRICT . �
PRESENT: LDR - l.ow Density Residential
RE4uES��: LMDR - Low Medium Density Resicientia(
SrrE AR�►: 640, 230 +/- sq. ft.
MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE DEN5ITY/INTEIVSITY{S} :
Current/Existing
Future �.and use(s): (RL) Residenfiial Low
14.698+/- acres
USE(S): .
Existing (currently on site
or previous use if vacant): Vacant/Preservation
Proposed Future Land Proposed (new use, if any;
Use(s) (if applicable): (RL) Residential Low plus existing if to remain): Residential/Preservation
(units, rooms or beds per acre or non-
res)dentla! square footage)
20NING DISTRIC'FS FOR ALL AD1AtENT PROPERTY:
North: LDR - Low Density Residential
soutr,: OS/R - Open Space Recreation
East: LMDR - Low Medium Densitv Residentia)
west: P - Preservation
STATE OF FtORIDA, COUNTY OF PtNEtLAS .
1, the underslgned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my
knowledge and authortze City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application.
Sworn to and subscribed before me this .3s��1 day of
2014 . to me and/or by
� l..a e11Ce MIIIS ' , who is personall has
_�1�
or representative
QFBOt{�Ilf J GOff
�otaryr Publi� - 8f�ta of Flodd�
y Comm. �xpjiet ieb 2�: �C1�
produced
Notary public,
My commission
LJ
as identification.
Planning & Developmer�t Department,lOQ S. Myrtle Avenue, Ctearwater, FL 8976b, 7e1: 727-662-4667; Fax: 727-662-4865
Page 2 of 6 Revised 03l72
� Planning & Development Uepartment
° � �a��fi�r . , .
� ..-��.��...��..��- Zon�ng Atlas Amendment Appl�catio�
u �:u: �.•� ;�°�...� �..,;��.�`�°,.�`*�":: �`
.�� �ubmiital Pa+ckag+� Checklist
IN AODITION TO T'HE CCiMRLE1`EO ZONINCs AilAS AMENDMENT APPUCATiOM, AlL ZO1ViNG A?`L�4S
AMENDMENT APP�.ICATi#NS SHAt.� lNi�.UDE A SUBMITTAL PACKAGE THAT INCLUDES THE �t)i.IOYVINGt
� Proaf of ownership te.g,, cc�py of deed, title insurance policy, or other instrumeM demonstrating
�wnership} [Note: Subm�t �two cop�es only �t tfits� of origia�rl appllcati�nj
6a Legai description of �e property, ►f the property is not a platted lot c�f record, a current boundary
survey prepared, signed and seated by a land surveyor currently regisie�ed in #he State of Florida is
r+eq�ired.
n/a O A copy a# deed restrictions appl�cable to the property to which tfie City is a party.
t� inforrnatian demonstrating that the proposed amendmeni compiies with the u'ite�ia set farth in Section
4602.F. 7i�� attached Zonirtg Atlas Amendment Standards for Review sheet sfiali be used to provide
these responses.
it/� C� Note: Any request #o+r Za�i�g Atias amendment which is inconsistent with the Comprehensive P{an
Futu�e tand Use Map designation must be accompanied by an Application far a�uture Land' Use Maq
Amendment (separate appiication).
n/a O A Traffic Impact St�rdy is not r�quired a� part of ti�e appiication for an arner�lm��C to the Zaning Ailas
{REZ). A Tra#fic impact Study may be prcclrvided at th� appiicanYs discretion to supplennent the
assessment af the impact of the pro�sed char�e on the adequ�aCy af pubiic fa�ilities {�xist�ng
roadwaysj. A 7raffic Imp�a�t Study may be required at the time a site �i� is submitted far deveioprnent
review if the total gen�rated nei new tnps generated by the propdsed develapment meet ane or rnQre
conditior�s outlined on �e appropria#e application.
���� FL���a �� DANCE: 1'he appl�cant or appltcant's agent is advised tc� �ttend aii pubii�
hearings sc�edu{ed f�►r the propox+e�d amendme�t indudir�g pubiic hearir�s b�fore the Cammunity
Develt�pment Bvard an�! City CounciL
�Pf�aad� 3 t).wiopun�t D�p�r�rrt, too s. Myrlt� xv.nw, CNarw�r, Ft. s3754, 7N: TZ7«�.t66i'; t�a� 7�3i�•�s
R+rvis+rd �3
_ _ __
�
° �l+ea�at��
U
Planning & Development Deparlament
Z�ning Atlas A�nendment
Stan�dard� for Revi�w
PR01tIDE COMPt;ETE ttESPONSES TO EACN Of 'TNE �!X {6) STANDARDS FOR REYiEW EJ(PiA1NtNG HCiW, iN
QE7Ail, THE CRtTER10N tS B�lNG C�lMPI,IED WITH PER TNIS ZLiNING ATiA�s AMEN�IMENT.
1. The proposed amen�irnent is eonsister�t with and furthers the goais, paiicies and objectives of the
Comp�ehensive Plan and f�urthers the purposes of the Community �velopment Code and other City
ordinances and actio�s designed to implemen# the Pian.
The prop�se� amendment is consistent with zonin� district of
adjacent property to the east.
2. The availabl� usesto wh�ch the property may b+e put are appropriate to the property which is subject to
the proposed am�ndment and compatibl� with existing and planned uses in the area.
east of the prc►perty and is therefvre apprapr�ate �nd compatibie
prupos�d use.
3. T#�e amendment does not confllct w�ih the needs and character of the neighbarhood and �city.
l" 1"!_�-_ '! -It't!tt"l !��_ !• •l� �i � l !.= 1'.=� • 1- a�f.�
• - � � • • • • •
4� The amendmenx will not adve�sely or unreasunably affect the use of nther pr+operty in th�e area.
This am�ndmen� wili nc�t adve�se! or unreasonabl affect the us�e c�f ather
property in the area. It is Consistent witM nearby property usage.
S, The amendment wiU �ot adversely bun#en puk�� f�citities, induding the traffic-carrying capa�ities a�f
streets, in an unreawnabty or dispropt��tir�na#e manner.
Thi a: d e 'I e ul � 'yi i� i+� w'� t dv ly
aurden current fa�ciliti�s or traffic��rryin�capa�cities of s�reets.
6. The di�sxrict baundaries ar� appropriately drawn with due re�ard to tt� bcations and classitications af
sireeeis, crwnershi� tines, existing improvemerits and the natural environment.
`n
w�th rec�ard t� the streets, c�wnershi I�nes, improvement and n�tural ,
environment.
Piurw�q l. p+rMelapltNllt D�pa�hm�f1t,140 8. �Ayr'� AY�n��rr Cl�urwakM'� FL E:175d, T111t 727 .�+'462•461�Ti fa� T27�62-44ftS
Pp�► 4 ot S Rs+ris�d �3i! 2
_ _.... _
.
��
o Planni�,g & Developnnent Depardnent
Y ' ��t��� Zoning At1as Amendment
� Aff`i.davit t�o Aut2iorize Agent/Representative
1. Rrouide names of ail property owners on deed — PRIN7 full names:
Sunstream Lar�e Development LL.0
c/o Terence M. McNay, as managing member
2. 't'hat (I amJwe �re} tt� awner(s) and �ecard titl� holde�{s) of the foilowing described praperty:
p�N: ���zs��.�•oa000-�.3o-osoo
3. i'hai this propeny constitutes ihe praperty for which a request fa� (descxibe request}:
Zbning at1a� amendment LDR to I.MDR
4. 'fhat the undersigned {hasJhave) appointed and (does/doj app�int:
IIS
as {hisjtheirj �gent(s) ta execute any pe�tions ar other documents rnecessary to affect su�ch
petitian;
S. That this affidavit has �en executed to i�duce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the
abave des�ribed propertY:
6. Ti�at site visits to tt�e property are neeessary by City repcesentatives in o�der to process this applit�tion
and the owner authorizes City representatives ta visit and phatograph th� propetty desa-i�ti in this
applicatior�;
7, t(Ifwe}, the urNders�graed authority, hereby cae�tify that the fo�+�aing is Lrue and akrrect.
' � �—
��P�Y �P�Y O+�vner
�nY ��' � �
��� �� �� ur�u��
THIS _ C�I�,,,_�„�, QAY O�
sT�►h o� �pa. C�+�rt�r t� ��atw►,s
AN OFF�R �Ct/ Gi)MMIS.S�NEO �Y THE LAWS t?i= THE STATE t3F �lQtit�A, O�i
�
P�RSONALLY AFPFARED
� WFtC? HAYING BEEN FIRST DULY SW�iN
061�D AND SAYS TNAT HF.jSNE FUU.Y UNflERSiANpS THE GONTEl�ITS t3F THE AFFIUAVfT THAT HEfStlE StGMED.
..�...Y..,
��+ � � � �� �� �� �� ��
tt � ��Y �c. S`t�N � fbrkl� "' ' �..
Go+�missia� 1 EE �f308 Nc�ary Pubii¢ 5�gnatvre
�' �. +� J� 26.?0]6
Ncrtary sea rr�p My Corr�mi�cion Expir�s: ( p� L, �j � i�#
PMann6p � D�vrlo�r�t p� i00 8. Myrp�r Avw�w. �� R. �375i:. T+Nz 'T27�662,4387: Fas� 727d�2�S
Pape � aI 5 Rsvhwwd 0�1T
REZ2014-08003
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
The North 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 32, Township 28
South, Range 16 East,-Pinellas County, Florida. -
LESS that part described as follows:
Commence at the Norfhwest corner of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of said
Section 32 for a Point of Beginning; thence go South 360 feet; thence East 700 feet;
thence North 360 feet; thence West to the Point of Beginning.
LESS
A portion of the North 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Norfheast 1/4 of Section 32,
Township 28 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida, being described as follows:
Commence at the Northwest corner of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of said
Section 32; thence S00°02'36"W for 360.00 feet; thence S89°43'28"E for 154.67 feet to the
POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continue S89°43'28"E for 236.65 feet; thence S64°29'O1 "W
for 91.32 feet; thence S75°42'43"W for 104.03 feet; thence N82°46'40"W for 33.42 feet;
thence N43°54'S9"W for 29.50 feet; thence N00°16'32"E for 40.70 feet to the POINT OF
BEGINNING.
(PLAT LEGAL)
Said parcel beinq further described as follows:
A portion of the Norfh 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 32,
Township 28 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida being described as follows:
BEGIN at the Southeast corner of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section
32; thence S00°O1'04"W along the West boundary of the East 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of
said Section 32 for 679.24 feet; thence leaving said West boundary N89°39' 1 1"W for
1328.96 feet; thence N00°00'Ol "E for 318.62 feet; thence S89°40'S1 "E for 154.67 feet;
thence S00°19'09"W for 40.70 feet; thence S43°52'22"E for 29.50 feet; thence S82°44'03"E
for 33.42 feet; thence N75°45'20"E for 104.03 feet; thence N64°31'38"E for 91.32 feet;
thence S89°40'S1 "E for 308.60 feet; thence N00°00'43"E for 360.00 feet; thence
S89°40'45"E for 629.17 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Contains 640,230 Square Feet or 14.698 Acres, more or less.
LESS that portion lying waterward of the jurisdictional wetland line being further
described as follows:
REZ2014-08003
A portion of the North 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 32,
Township 28 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida being described as follows:
COMMENCE at the Southeast corner of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of said
Section 32; thence S00°O1'04"W along the West boundary of the East 1/2 of the
Northeast 1/4 of said Section 32 for 679.24 feet; thence leaving said West boundary
N89°39'l l"W for 1 110.56 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continue N89°39'l l"W
for 218.41 feet; thence N00°00'Ol "E for 318.62 feet; thence S89°40'S1 "E for 154.67 feet;
thence S00°19'09"W for 40.70 feet; thence S43°52'22"E for 29.50 feet; thence S82°44'03"E
for 33.42 feet; thence N75°45'20"E for 104.03 feet; thence N64°31'38"E for 91.32 feet;
thence S89°40'S1 "E for 95.71 feet; thence S24°21'07"E for 65.45 feet; thence S09°13'O1 "W
for 43.93 feet; thence SO4°16'S4"W for 75.01 feet; thence S31 °02'39"W for 52.24 feet;
thence S46°39'28"W for 65.44 feet; thence S63°50'O1 "W for 23.88 feet; thence
S29°36'41 "W for 32.06 feet; thence S87°48'09"W for 42.64 feet; thence S84°26' 15"W for
45.04 feet; thence S89°10'13"W for 44.84 feet; thence S83°05'08"W for 39.18 feet to the
POINT OF BEGINNING.
Contains 140,945 square feet or 3.236 Acres, more or less.